Vanda Pharmaceuticals
Annual Report 2017

Plain-text annual report

Table of Contents UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 ☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934Commission File No. 001-34186 VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 03-0491827(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 300 EWashington D.C. 20037(202) 734-3400(Address and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which RegisteredCommon Stock, par value $0.001 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq Global Market)Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC(Nasdaq Global Market)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filingrequirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data Filerequired to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorterperiod that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, tothe best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment tothis Form 10-K. ☒Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or anemerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes ☐ No ☒As of June 30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s last completed second quarter, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held bynon-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $715.2 million based on the closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock, as reported by the NasdaqGlobal Market, on such date. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and stockholders known by the registrant to own 10% ormore of the outstanding stock based on public filings and other information known to the registrant have been excluded since such persons may be deemedaffiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of February 1, 2018 was 45,437,938.The exhibit index as required by Item 601(a) of Regulation S-K is included in Item 15 of Part IV of this report.DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCESpecified portions of the registrant’s proxy statement with respect to the registrant’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is to be filedpursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, are incorporated by reference into Part IIIof this Form 10-K. Table of ContentsVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.Form 10-KTable of Contents Page Part I Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 1 Item 1 Business 3 Item 1A Risk Factors 17 Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments 42 Item 2 Properties 42 Item 3 Legal Proceedings 42 Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures 43 Part II Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 44 Item 6 Selected Consolidated Financial Data 46 Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 47 Item 7A Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk 56 Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 57 Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 57 Item 9A Controls and Procedures 57 Item 9B Other Information 57 Part III Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 58 Item 11 Executive Compensation 58 Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 58 Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 58 Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services 58 Part IV Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 58 Signatures 59 Exhibits 89 Table of ContentsPART ICAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSVarious statements throughout this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.Words such as, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “goal,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” and“could,” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions or words, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based uponcurrent expectations that involve risks, changes in circumstances, assumptions and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differmaterially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements include, among others: • the ability of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (we, our, the Company or Vanda) to continue to commercialize HETLIOZ® (tasimelteon) for thetreatment of Non-24-Hour Sleep-Wake Disorder (Non-24) in the United States (U.S.) and Europe; • uncertainty as to the ability to increase market awareness of Non-24 and the market acceptance of HETLIOZ®; • our ability to continue to generate U.S. sales of Fanapt® (iloperidone) for the treatment of schizophrenia; • our dependence on third-party manufacturers to manufacture HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® in sufficient quantities and quality; • our level of success in commercializing HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® in new markets; • our ability to prepare, file, prosecute, defend and enforce any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; • a loss of rights to develop and commercialize our products under our license agreements; • the ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our products, and the labeling for any approved products; • the timing and success of preclinical studies and clinical trials; • a failure of our products to be demonstrably safe and effective; • the size and growth of the potential markets for our products and the ability to serve those markets; • our expectations regarding trends with respect to our revenues, costs, expenses, liabilities and cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities; • the scope, progress, expansion, and costs of developing and commercializing our products; • our failure to identify or obtain rights to new products; • a loss of any of our key scientists or management personnel; • limitations on our ability to utilize some or all of our prior net operating losses and orphan drug and research and development credits; • the cost and effects of litigation; • our ability to obtain the capital necessary to fund our research and development or commercial activities; • losses incurred from product liability claims made against us; and • use of our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.All written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by thecautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We caution investors not to rely too heavily on the forward-looking statements we make or thatare made on our behalf. We undertake no obligation, and specifically decline any obligation, to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements,whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 1 Table of ContentsWe encourage you to read Management’s Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidatedfinancial statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K. We also encourage you to read Item 1A of Part I of this annual report on Form 10-K,entitled Risk Factors, which contains a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business. In addition to the risks describedabove and in Item 1A of this report, other unknown or unpredictable factors also could affect our results. Therefore, the information in this report should beread together with other reports and documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including on Form 10-Q andForm 8-K, which may supplement, modify, supersede or update those risk factors. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-lookingstatements in this report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. Inlight of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or anyother person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame, or at all. 2 Table of ContentsITEM 1. BUSINESSOverviewVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (we, our, the Company or Vanda) is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on the development andcommercialization of innovative therapies to address high unmet medical needs and improve the lives of patients. Vanda commenced its operations in 2003and our product portfolio includes: • HETLIOZ® (tasimelteon), a product for the treatment of Non-24-Hour Sleep-Wake Disorder (Non-24), was approved by the U.S. Food and DrugAdministration (FDA) in January 2014 and launched commercially in the U.S. in April 2014. In July 2015, the European Commission (EC)granted centralized marketing authorization with unified labeling for HETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24 in totally blind adults.HETLIOZ® was commercially launched in Germany in August 2016. HETLIOZ® has potential utility in a number of other circadian rhythmdisorders and is presently in clinical development for the treatment of Pediatric Non-24, Jet Lag Disorder and Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS). • Fanapt® (iloperidone), a product for the treatment of schizophrenia, the oral formulation of which was approved by the FDA in May 2009 andlaunched commercially in the U.S. by Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis) in January 2010. Novartis transferred all the U.S. and Canadian commercialrights to the Fanapt® franchise to us on December 31, 2014. Additionally, our distribution partners launched Fanapt® in Israel and Mexico in2014. Fanapt® has potential utility in a number of other disorders. An assessment of new Fanapt® clinical opportunities is ongoing. • Tradipitant (VLY-686), a small molecule neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) antagonist, which is presently in clinical development for the treatmentof chronic pruritus in atopic dermatitis and the treatment of gastroparesis. • VTR-297 (formerly Trichostatin A), a small molecule histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. • VQW-765 (formerly AQW-051), a Phase II alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist. • Portfolio of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) activators and inhibitors.Since we began operations in March 2003, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to the in-licensing, clinical development andcommercialization of our products. Our ability to generate meaningful product sales and achieve profitability largely depends on our level of success incommercializing HETLIOZ® in the U.S. and Europe and Fanapt® in the U.S. alone or with others, to complete the development of our products, and to obtainthe regulatory approvals for and to manufacture, market and sell our products. The results of our operations will vary significantly from year-to-year andquarter-to-quarter and depend on a number of factors, including risks related to our business, risks related to our industry, and other risks which are detailed inItem 1A of Part I entitled Risk Factors and Item 7 of Part II entitled Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsof this annual report on Form 10-K.Our activities will necessitate significant uses of working capital in 2018 and beyond. We are currently concentrating our efforts on selling HETLIOZ®and Fanapt® in the U.S. and our continued commercialization of HETLIOZ® in Europe. Additionally, we continue to pursue market approval of HETLIOZ®and Fanapt® in other regions. We will continue to work with our distribution partners on the commercialization of Fanapt® outside the U.S. We seeopportunities to grow our commercial products through life cycle management strategies that include the addition of new indications and formulations. Wehave built a research and development organization that includes extensive expertise in the scientific disciplines of pharmacogenetics andpharmacogenomics. We operate cross-functionally and are led by an experienced research and development management team. Our pipeline includes novelprograms that could address largely unmet medical needs.Our founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D., started Vanda’s operations in early 2003 after establishing and leading thePharmacogenetics Department at Novartis. In acquiring and developing our products, we have relied upon our deep expertise in the scientific disciplines ofpharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics. These scientific disciplines examine both genetic variations among people that influence response to a particulardrug, and the multiple pathways through which drugs affect people.Our StrategyOur goal is to create a leading global biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapies addressing highunmet medical needs through the application of our drug development expertise and our pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics expertise. The keyelements of our strategy to accomplish this goal are to: • Maximize the commercial success of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®; • Enter into strategic partnerships to supplement our capabilities and to extend our commercial reach; 3 Table of Contents • Pursue the clinical development and regulatory approval of our products; • Apply our pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics expertise to differentiate our products; and • Expand our product portfolio through the identification and acquisition of additional products.ProductsWe have the following products on the market or under regulatory review: Product Indication Geography Select Historical MilestonesHETLIOZ®(tasimelteon) Non-24 United States FDA approval in January 2014;Commercial launch in April 2014 Europe EC approval in July 2015;Commercial launch in Germany in August 2016Fanapt® (Oral)(iloperidone) Schizophrenia United States FDA approval in May 2009;Commercial launch in January 2010;U.S. and Canada rights sublicensed to Novartis in October 2009 and reacquired by Vanda inDecember 2014;Long term maintenance supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) approval in May 2016Fanaptum® (Oral)(iloperidone) Mexico Market approval in October 2013;Commercial launch in the fourth quarter of 2014 by our local distribution partner Israel Market approval August 2012;Commercial launch in the fourth quarter of 2014 by our local distribution partnerWe have the following products in clinical development: Product Target Indication Select Historical MilestonesHETLIOZ®(tasimelteon) Pediatric Non-24 Initiated a liquid formulation pharmacokinetic study in the fourth quarter of 2016 SMS Initiated a placebo controlled study in the fourth quarter of 2016 Jet Lag Disorder Initiated a placebo controlled transmeridian travel study in the fourth quarter of 2016; Initiated a placebo controlled simulated jet lag study in the fourth quarter of 2017 Fanapt® (Oral)(iloperidone) Schizophrenia Long-acting injectable under evaluation Other Disorders Potential indications are under evaluation including bipolar depression, major depressivedisorder and post-traumatic stress disorder – nightmares Tradipitant (VLY-686) Pruritus in patients withAtopic Dermatitis Completed a placebo controlled clinical study and reported results in the third quarter of 2017 Gastroparesis Initiated a placebo controlled study in fourth quarter of 2016 VTR-297 Oncology In development for hematologic malignancies VQW-765 CNS Disorders Potential indications are under strategic evaluation including cognitive impairment 4 Table of ContentsHETLIOZ®Commercial opportunity: Non-24In January 2014, HETLIOZ® was approved in the U.S. for the treatment of Non-24. Non-24 is a serious, rare and chronic circadian rhythm disordercharacterized by the inability to entrain (synchronize) the master body clock with the 24-hour day-night cycle. HETLIOZ® is the first FDA approvedtreatment for Non-24. HETLIOZ® is a melatonin agonist of the human MT1 and MT2 receptors, with greater specificity for MT2. These receptors are thoughtto be involved in the control of circadian rhythms. HETLIOZ® is believed to reset the master body clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, located in thehypothalamus, resulting in the entrainment and alignment of the body’s melatonin and cortisol rhythms to the 24-hour day-night cycle. HETLIOZ® waslaunched commercially in the U.S. in April 2014. In addition, in July 2015, the EC granted centralized marketing authorization with unified labeling forHETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24 in totally blind adults and included post-marketing commitments related to a pediatric investigation plan. Thisauthorization is valid in the 28 countries that are members of the European Union (E.U.), as well as European Economic Area members Iceland, Liechtensteinand Norway. HETLIOZ® was launched commercially in Germany in August 2016.In January 2010, the FDA granted orphan drug designation status for HETLIOZ® in Non-24 in blind individuals. The FDA grants orphan drugdesignation to drugs that may provide significant therapeutic advantage over existing treatments and target conditions affecting 200,000 or fewer U.S.patients per year. Orphan drug designation provides potential financial and regulatory incentives, including study design assistance, tax credits, waiver ofFDA user fees, and up to seven years of market exclusivity upon marketing approval. In February 2011, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) designatedHETLIOZ® as an orphan medicinal product for the same indication.Non-24 affects a majority of totally blind individuals, or approximately 80,000 people in the U.S. Blind individuals who develop Non-24 lack thelight sensitivity necessary to synchronize the master body clock in the brain with the 24-hour day-night cycle. In sighted individuals, decreased exposure orsensitivity to light and social and physical activity cues may contribute to a free-running circadian rhythm. With the high frequency of mental disordersinvolving social isolation and cases of Non-24 developing after a change in sleep habits, behavioral factors in combination with physiological tendency mayprecipitate and perpetuate this disorder in sighted individuals. Hospitalized individuals with neurological and psychiatric disorders can become insensitiveto social cues, predisposing them to the development of Non-24.Most people have a master body clock that naturally runs longer than 24-hours and light is the primary environmental cue that resets it to 24 hourseach day. Individuals with Non-24 have a master body clock that is not reset, and continually delays, resulting in prolonged periods of misalignmentbetween their circadian rhythms and the 24-hour day-night cycle, including the timing of melatonin and cortisol secretion. As a result of this misalignment,Non-24 is associated with significant disruption of the sleep-wake cycle and impairments in social and occupational functioning, and marked subjectivedistress. Individuals with Non-24 cycle in-and out-of phase and suffer from disrupted nighttime sleep patterns and/or excessive daytime sleepiness.While there are no FDA or EC approved treatments for Non-24 other than HETLIOZ®, there are a number of drugs approved and prescribed for patientswith sleep disorders. The most commonly prescribed drugs are hypnotics. See Competition below for a discussion of commonly prescribed drugs for patientswith sleep disorders.Therapeutic opportunity: Circadian Rhythm Sleep DisordersSleep disorders are segmented into three major categories: primary insomnia, secondary insomnia and circadian rhythm sleep disorders (CRSDs).Insomnia is a symptom complex that comprises difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep, or non-refreshing sleep, in combination with daytime dysfunctionor distress. The symptom complex can be an independent disorder (primary insomnia) or be a result of another condition such as depression or anxiety(secondary insomnia). CRSDs result from a misalignment of the sleep/wake cycle and an individual’s daily activities or lifestyle. The circadian rhythm is therhythmic output of the human biological clock and is governed by the hormones melatonin and cortisol. Both the timing of behavioral events (activity,sleep, and social interactions) and the environmental light/dark cycle result in a sleep/wake cycle that follows the circadian rhythm. Examples of CRSDsinclude transient disorders such as jet lag and chronic disorders such as delayed sleep phase disorder, shift work sleep disorder and Non-24. We are planningto develop HETLIOZ® for the treatment of pediatric Non-24. We initiated a pediatric liquid formulation pharmacokinetic study in the fourth quarter of 2016.We initiated an open label interventional study in patients with SMS in the fourth quarter of 2015 and shared the results at the joint congress of WorldAssociation of Sleep Medicine and World Sleep federation in October 2017, which showed that parents of children with SMS reported improvement in sleepquality and a decrease in aberrant behaviors during treatment as compared to baseline. We initiated a SMS placebo controlled study in the fourth quarter of2016. Enrollment in this study is ongoing. SMS is a rare genetic disorder caused by a deletion on chromosome 17. The U.S. National Institute of Healthestimates that SMS affects approximately one in 20,000 births in the U.S. 5 Table of ContentsWe initiated an observational study in Jet Lag Disorder in the fourth quarter of 2015. The data from that study was used to support clinical studydesign for our two placebo controlled studies. We initiated a placebo controlled transmeridian travel study in the fourth quarter of 2016 and a placebocontrolled simulated jet lag study in the fourth quarter of 2017.Fanapt®Commercial Opportunity: SchizophreniaFanapt® is a product for the treatment of schizophrenia. In May 2009, the FDA granted U.S. marketing approval of Fanapt® for the acute treatment ofschizophrenia in adults. In October 2009, we entered into an amended and restated sublicense agreement with Novartis. We had originally entered into asublicense agreement with Novartis in June 2004 pursuant to which we obtained certain worldwide exclusive licenses from Novartis relating to Fanapt®.Pursuant to the amended and restated sublicense agreement, Novartis had exclusive commercialization rights to all formulations of Fanapt® in the U.S. andCanada. In January 2010, Novartis launched Fanapt® in the U.S. On December 31, 2014, Novartis transferred all the U.S. and Canadian commercial rights tothe Fanapt® franchise to Vanda as part of a settlement agreement. In June 2015, we announced positive results from REPRIEVE, a Phase III long-termmaintenance study that was conducted by Novartis. In May 2016, the FDA approved a sNDA for Fanapt® for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia inadults.In July 2017, the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) issued a negative opinion recommending against approval ofFanaptum® (oral iloperidone tablets) for the treatment of schizophrenia in adult patients in the E.U. The CHMP was of the opinion that the benefits ofFanaptum® did not outweigh its risks and recommended against marketing authorization. The negative opinion was upheld upon appeal in November 2017.We received market approval for the commercialization of Fanapt® in Israel in August 2012 and in Mexico in October 2013. Our distribution partnerslaunched Fanapt® in Israel and Mexico in 2014. As of December 31, 2017, we no longer have an active distributor relationship in Mexico.Schizophrenia is a chronic, debilitating mental disorder characterized by hallucinations, delusions, racing thoughts and other psychotic symptoms(collectively referred to as “positive symptoms”), as well as moodiness, anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure), loss of interest, eating disturbances andwithdrawal (collectively referred to as “negative symptoms”), and attention and memory deficits (collectively referred to as “cognitive symptoms”).Schizophrenia develops in late adolescence or early adulthood in approximately 1% of the world’s population. Most schizophrenia patients today are treatedwith drugs known as “atypical” antipsychotics, which were first approved in the U.S. in the late 1980s. These antipsychotics have been named “atypical” fortheir ability to treat a broader range of negative symptoms than the first-generation “typical” antipsychotics, which were introduced in the 1950s and are nowgeneric. Atypical antipsychotics are generally regarded as having improved side effect profiles and efficacy relative to typical antipsychotics. SeeCompetition below for a discussion of commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics in addition to Fanapt®.Pursuant to a settlement agreement with Novartis, we reacquired the U.S. and Canadian rights to the long-acting injectable (depot) formulation ofFanapt®. We are evaluating the commercial opportunity around the depot formulation.Therapeutic opportunity: OtherWe are currently in the process of evaluating potential indications, including bipolar depression, major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stressdisorder – nightmares.Tradipitant (VLY-686)Tradipitant is a small molecule NK-1R antagonist that we licensed from Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) in April 2012. NK-1R antagonists have beenevaluated in a number of indications including chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, post-operative nausea and vomiting, gastroparesis, alcoholdependence, anxiety, depression and chronic pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis.We commenced a Phase II clinical study of tradipitant in the treatment of chronic pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis in 2014. Results from thisstudy, which were announced in March 2015, showed no significant difference from placebo on the pre-specified primary endpoint. Vanda believes this proofof concept study was informative, in that through subsequent analyses, it revealed statistically significant and clinically meaningful responses acrossmultiple outcomes evaluated in individuals with higher blood plasma levels of tradipitant at the time of their pruritus assessments. We initiated a placebocontrolled pruritus proof of concept study in the second quarter of 2016. Results from this study, which were announced in September 2017, showedsignificant improvements in itch and disease severity. These results were presented at the 9th World Congress of Itch in October 2017. 6 Table of ContentsWe initiated a placebo controlled Phase II clinical study of tradipitant in the treatment of gastroparesis in the fourth quarter of 2016.VTR-297VTR-297 is a small molecule HDAC inhibitor with potential use as a treatment for several oncology indications. The FDA accepted an InvestigationalNew Drug (IND) application for VTR-297 in 2017 and provided authorization to proceed with the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractoryhematologic malignancies.VQW-765VQW-765 is a Phase II alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist that we licensed from Novartis on December 31, 2014 pursuant to asettlement agreement. We are evaluating potential indications, including cognitive impairment.License AgreementsOur rights to develop and commercialize our products are subject to the terms and conditions of licenses granted to us by other pharmaceuticalcompanies.HETLIOZ®In February 2004, we entered into a license agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) under which we received an exclusive worldwide licenseunder certain patents and patent applications, and other licenses to intellectual property, to develop and commercialize HETLIOZ®. As a result of the FDA’sapproval of the HETLIOZ® New Drug Application (NDA) in January 2014, we made an $8.0 million milestone payment to BMS in the first quarter of 2014under the license agreement that was capitalized as an intangible asset and is being amortized over the estimated economic useful life of the related productpatents which is the remaining life of the U.S. method of use patent for HETLIOZ® in the U.S. We are obligated to make a future milestone payment to BMSof $25.0 million when cumulative worldwide sales of HETLIOZ® reach $250.0 million, which is expected to occur in the first half of 2018. The probablefuture $25.0 million milestone obligation was capitalized as an intangible asset in the first quarter of 2015 and is being amortized over the estimatedeconomic useful life of the related product patents which is the remaining life of the U.S. method of use patent for HETLIOZ® in the U.S. Additionally, we areobligated to make royalty payments on HETLIOZ® net sales to BMS in any territory where we commercialize HETLIOZ® for a period equal to the greater of10 years following the first commercial sale in the territory or the expiry of the new chemical entity patent in that territory. During the period prior to theexpiry of the new chemical entity patent in a territory, we are obligated to pay a 10% royalty on net sales in that territory. The royalty rate is decreased byhalf for countries in which no new chemical entity patent existed or for the remainder of the 10 years after the expiry of the new chemical entity patent. Weare also obligated under the license agreement to pay BMS a percentage of any sublicense fees, upfront payments and milestone and other payments(excluding royalties) that we receive from a third party in connection with any sublicensing arrangement, at a rate which is in the mid-twenties. We haveagreed with BMS in our license agreement for HETLIOZ® to use our commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize HETLIOZ®.Either partymay terminate the HETLIOZ® license agreement under certain circumstances, including a material breach of the agreement by the other. In the event weterminate our license, or if BMS terminates our license due to our breach, all rights licensed and developed by us under this agreement will revert or otherwisebe licensed back to BMS on an exclusive basis.Fanapt®Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement with Novartis, Novartis transferred all U.S. and Canadian rights in the Fanapt® franchise to us onDecember 31, 2014. We were obligated to make royalty payments to Sanofi S.A. (Sanofi) and Titan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Titan) at a percentage rate equal to23% on annual U.S. net sales of Fanapt® up to $200.0 million, and at a percentage rate in the mid-twenties on sales over $200.0 million through November2016. In February 2016, we amended the agreement with Sanofi and Titan to remove Titan as the entity through which royalty payments from Vanda aredirected to Sanofi following the expiration of the new chemical entity patent for Fanapt® in the U.S. on November 15, 2016. Under the amended agreement,we pay directly to Sanofi a fixed royalty of 3% of net sales from November 16, 2016 through December 31, 2019 related to manufacturing know-how. Wemade a $2.0 million pre-payment during the year ended December 31, 2016 that applied to this 3% manufacturing know-how royalty. No further royalties onmanufacturing know-how are payable by us after December 31, 2019. This amended agreement did not alter Titan’s obligation under the license agreement tomake royalty payments to Sanofi prior to November 16, 2016 or our obligation to pay Sanofi a fixed royalty on Fanapt® net sales equal up to 6% onSanofi know-how not 7 Table of Contentsrelated to manufacturing under certain conditions for a period of up to 10 years in markets where the new chemical entity patent has expired or was notissued. We may lose our rights to develop and commercialize Fanapt® if we fail to comply with certain requirements in the Titan license agreement regardingour financial condition, or if we fail to comply with certain diligence obligations regarding our development or commercialization activities.Tradipitant (VLY-686)In April 2012, we entered into a license agreement with Lilly pursuant to which we acquired an exclusive worldwide license under certain patents andpatent applications, and other licenses to intellectual property, to develop and commercialize an NK-1R antagonist, tradipitant, for all human indications.The patent describing tradipitant as a new chemical entity expires in April 2023, except in the U.S., where it expires in June 2024 absent any applicablepatent term adjustments. Lilly is eligible to receive future payments based upon achievement of specified development and commercialization milestones aswell as tiered-royalties on net sales at percentage rates up to the low double digits. These milestones include $4.0 million for pre-NDA approval milestonesand up to $95.0 million for future regulatory approval and sales milestones. The $4.0 million of pre-NDA approval milestones includes $2.0 million dueupon enrollment of the first subject into a Phase III study for tradipitant and $2.0 million due upon the filing of the first marketing authorization fortradipitant in either the U.S. or the E.U. The likelihood of achieving the enrollment of the first subject into a Phase III study for tradipitant was determined tobe probable during the third quarter of 2017. As a result, the future obligation of $2.0 million tied to such milestone was recorded as research anddevelopment expense in 2017. We are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize tradipitant. Either party may terminatethe agreement under certain circumstances, including a material breach of the agreement by the other. In the event that we terminate the agreement, or if Lillyterminates the agreement due to our breach or for certain other reasons set forth in the agreement, all rights licensed and developed by us under the agreementwill revert or otherwise be licensed back to Lilly on an exclusive basis, subject to payment by Lilly to us of a royalty on net sales of products that containtradipitant.VQW-765In connection with the settlement agreement with Novartis relating to Fanapt®, we received an exclusive worldwide license under certain patents andpatent applications, and other licenses to intellectual property, to develop and commercialize VQW-765, a Phase II alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptorpartial agonist. Pursuant to the license agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize VQW-765 and areresponsible for all development costs. We have no milestone obligations, but Novartis is eligible to receive tiered-royalties on net sales at percentage rates upto the mid-teens.Either party may terminate the agreement under certain circumstances, including a material breach of the agreement by the other. In the event that weterminate the agreement, or if Novartis terminates the agreement due to our breach or for certain other reasons set forth in the agreement, all rights licensedand developed by us under the agreement will revert or otherwise be licensed back to Novartis on an exclusive basis, subject to payment by Novartis to us ofa royalty on net sales of products that contain VQW-765.Portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitorsIn March 2017, we entered into a license agreement with the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), under which we acquired an exclusiveworldwide license to develop and commercialize a portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitors. Pursuant to the license agreement, we will develop andcommercialize the CFTR activators and inhibitors and are responsible for all development costs under the license agreement, includingcurrent pre-investigational new drug development work. The license agreement provides for an initial license fee of $1.0 million, which was paid by us in thefirst quarter of 2017, annual maintenance fees and up to $46.0 million in potential regulatory and sales milestone obligations. UCSF is also eligible toreceive single-digit tiered royalties on net sales.Either party may terminate the agreement under certain circumstances. In the event that we terminate the agreement, or if UCSF terminates theagreement due to our breach or for certain other reasons set forth in the agreement, all rights licensed and developed by us under the agreement will revert orotherwise be licensed back to UCSF. Termination will not relieve Vanda of its obligation to pay royalties or other payments owed, if any, to UCSF under theterms of the agreement.Government RegulationGovernment authorities in the U.S., at the federal, state and local level, as well as foreign countries and local foreign governments, regulate theresearch, development, testing, manufacture, labeling, promotion, advertising, distribution, sampling, marketing, import and export of our products. Otherthan HETLIOZ® in the U.S. and the E.U. and Fanapt® in the U.S., Israel and Mexico, all of our products will require regulatory approval by governmentagencies prior to commercialization. In particular, human pharmaceutical products are subject to rigorous pre-clinical and clinical trials and other approvalprocedures of the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in foreign countries. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent compliance withappropriate domestic and foreign laws, rules and regulations require the expenditure of significant time and human and financial resources. 8 Table of ContentsUnited States government regulationFDA approval processIn the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended, and implements regulations. If we fail to comply withthe applicable requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process, or after approval, we may become subject toadministrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, withdrawals of approvals, clinicalholds, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of our operations, injunctions, fines, civil penalties or criminalprosecution. Any such sanction could have a material adverse effect on our business.The steps required before a drug may be marketed in the U.S. include: • pre-clinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies under Current Good Laboratory Practices (cGLP); • submission to the FDA of an investigational new drug application (IND), which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin; • execution of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug for each indication for which approval issought; • submission to the FDA of an NDA; • satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the drug is produced to assess compliance withCurrent Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP); and • FDA review and approval of the NDA.Pre-clinical studies generally are conducted in laboratory animals to evaluate the potential safety and activity of a drug. Violation of the FDA’s cGLPregulations can, in some cases, lead to invalidation of the studies, requiring these studies to be replicated. In the U.S., drug developers submit the results ofpre-clinical trials, together with manufacturing information and analytical and stability data, to the FDA as part of the IND, which must become effectivebefore clinical trials can begin in the U.S. An IND becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA unless before that time the FDA raises concerns orquestions about issues such as the proposed clinical trials outlined in the IND. In that case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding FDAconcerns or questions before clinical trials can proceed. If these concerns or questions are unresolved, the FDA may not allow the clinical trials to commence.Pilot studies generally are conducted in a limited patient population, approximately three to 25 subjects, to determine whether the drug warrantsfurther clinical trials based on preliminary indications of efficacy. These pilot studies may be performed in the U.S. after an IND has become effective oroutside of the U.S. prior to the filing of an IND in the U.S. in accordance with applicable government regulations and institutional procedures.Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators. Clinicaltrials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the study, the parameters to be used in assessing the safety and theeffectiveness of the drug. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND prior to beginning the trial.Typically, clinical evaluation involves a time-consuming and costly three-Phase sequential process, but the phases may overlap. Each trial must bereviewed, approved and conducted under the auspices of an independent Institutional Review Board, and each trial must include the patient’s informedconsent. • Phase I: refers typically to closely-monitored clinical trials and includes the initial introduction of an investigational new drug into humanpatients or healthy volunteer subjects. Phase I trials are designed to determine the safety, metabolism and pharmacologic actions of a drug inhumans, the potential side effects associated with increasing drug doses and, if possible, to gain early evidence of the drug’s effectiveness. PhaseI trials also include the study of structure-activity relationships and mechanism of action in humans, as well as studies in which investigationalnew drugs are used as research tools to explore biological phenomena or disease processes. During Phase I trials, sufficient information about adrug’s pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects should be obtained to permit the design of well-controlled, scientifically valid Phase IIstudies. The total number of subjects and patients included in Phase I trials varies, but is generally in the range of 20 to 80 people. 9 Table of Contents • Phase II: refers to controlled clinical trials conducted to evaluate appropriate dosage and the effectiveness of a drug for a particular indication orindications in patients with a disease or condition under study and to determine the common short-term side effects and risks associated with thedrug. These trials are typically well-controlled, closely monitored and conducted in a relatively small number of patients, usually involving nomore than several hundred subjects. • Phase III: refers to expanded controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials. These trials are performed after preliminary evidence suggestingeffectiveness of a drug has been obtained. Phase III trials are intended to gather additional information about the effectiveness and safety that isneeded to evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the drug and to provide an adequate basis for physician labeling. Phase III trialsusually include several hundred to several thousand subjects.Phase I, II and III testing may not be completed successfully within any specified time period, if at all. The FDA closely monitors the progress of each ofthe three phases of clinical trials that are conducted in the U.S. and may, at its discretion, reevaluate, alter, suspend or terminate the testing based upon thedata accumulated to that point and the FDA’s assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the patient. A clinical program is designed after assessing the causes ofthe disease, the mechanism of action of the active pharmaceutical ingredient of the drug and all clinical and pre-clinical data of previous trials performed.Typically, the trial design protocols and efficacy endpoints are established in consultation with the FDA. Upon request through a special protocolassessment, the FDA can also provide specific guidance on the acceptability of protocol design for clinical trials. The FDA, we or our partners may suspend orterminate clinical trials at any time for various reasons, including a finding that the subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. TheFDA can also request additional clinical trials be conducted as a condition to drug approval. During all clinical trials, physicians monitor the patients todetermine effectiveness and to observe and report any reactions or other safety risks that may result from use of the drug.Assuming successful completion of the required clinical trials, drug developers submit the results of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, togetherwith other detailed information including information on the manufacture and composition of the drug, to the FDA, in the form of an NDA, requestingapproval to market the drug for one or more indications. In most cases, the NDA must be accompanied by a substantial user fee. The FDA reviews an NDA todetermine, among other things, whether a drug is safe and effective for its intended use.Before approving an NDA, the FDA will inspect the facility or facilities where the drug is manufactured. The FDA will not approve the applicationunless cGMP compliance is satisfactory. The FDA will issue an approval letter if it determines that the application, manufacturing process and manufacturingfacilities are acceptable. If the FDA determines that the NDA, manufacturing process or manufacturing facilities are not acceptable, it will issue a completeresponse letter (CRL), in which it will outline the deficiencies in the submission and will often request additional testing or information. Notwithstanding thesubmission of any requested additional information, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval andrefuse to approve the NDA.The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and each may take several years to complete. The FDA maynot grant approval on a timely basis, or at all. We or our partners may encounter difficulties or unanticipated costs in our efforts to secure necessarygovernmental approvals, which could delay or preclude us or our partners from marketing our products. Furthermore, the FDA may prevent a drug developerfrom marketing a drug under a label for its desired indications or place other conditions on distribution as a condition of any approvals, which may impaircommercialization of the drug. After approval, some types of changes to the approved drug, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes andadditional labeling claims, are subject to further FDA review and approval. Similar regulatory procedures must also be followed within countries outside theU.S.If the FDA approves the NDA, the drug becomes available for physicians to prescribe in the U.S. After approval of our products, we have to complywith a number of post-approval requirements, including delivering periodic reports to the FDA, submitting descriptions of any adverse reactions reported,and complying with drug sampling and distribution requirements. We and our partners also are required to provide updated safety and efficacy informationand to comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotional labeling. Also, our quality control and manufacturing procedures must continue toconform to cGMP after approval. Drug manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their facilities and are subject to periodic unannouncedinspections by the FDA to assess compliance with cGMP which imposes certain procedural and documentation requirements relating to quality assurance andquality control. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintaincompliance with cGMP and other aspects of regulatory compliance. The FDA may require post market testing and surveillance to monitor the drug’s safety orefficacy, including additional studies, known as Phase IV trials, to evaluate long-term effects.In addition to studies requested by the FDA after approval, we or our partners may have to conduct other trials and studies to explore use of theapproved product for treatment of new indications, which require FDA approval. The purpose of these trials and studies is to broaden the application and useof the product and its acceptance in the medical community. 10 Table of ContentsWe use, and will continue to use, third-party manufacturers to produce our products in clinical and commercial quantities. Future FDA inspections mayidentify compliance issues at our facilities or at the facilities of our contract manufacturers that may disrupt production or distribution, or require substantialresources to correct. In addition, discovery of problems with a product or the failure to comply with requirements may result in restrictions on a product,manufacturer or holder of an approved NDA, including withdrawal or recall of the product from the market or other voluntary or FDA-initiated action thatcould delay further marketing. Newly discovered or developed safety or effectiveness data may require changes to a product’s approved labeling, includingthe addition of new warnings and contraindications.In September 2007, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), was enacted into law, amending the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, andCosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act. The FDAAA made a number of substantive and incremental changes to the review and approval processes inways that could make it more difficult or costly to obtain approval for new pharmaceutical products, or to produce, market and distribute existingpharmaceutical products. Most significantly, the law changed the FDA’s handling of postmarked drug product safety issues by giving the FDA authority torequire post approval studies or clinical trials, to request that safety information be provided in labeling, or to require an NDA applicant to submit andexecute a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS).The FDAAA made certain changes to the user fee provisions to permit the use of user fee revenue to fund the FDA’s drug product safety activities andthe review of Direct-to-Consumer advertisements. The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act of 2012, which became effective in October2012, reauthorized the authority of the FDA to collect user fees to fund the FDA’s review activities.In addition, new government requirements may be established that could delay or prevent regulatory approval of our products under development.The Hatch-Waxman ActIn seeking approval for a drug through an NDA, applicants are required to list with the FDA each patent with claims that cover the applicant’s drug.Upon approval of a drug, each of the patents listed in the application for the drug is then published in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with TherapeuticEquivalence Evaluations, commonly known as the “Orange Book.” Drugs listed in the Orange Book can, in turn be cited by potential competitors in supportof approval of an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA). An ANDA provides for marketing of a drug that has the same active ingredients in the samestrengths and dosage form as the listed drug and has been shown through bioequivalence testing to be therapeutically equivalent to the listed drug. ANDAapplicants are not required to conduct or submit results of pre-clinical or clinical tests to prove the safety or effectiveness of their drug, other than therequirement for bioequivalence testing. Drugs approved in this way are commonly referred to as “generic equivalents” to the listed drug, and can often besubstituted by pharmacists under prescriptions written for the original listed drug.The ANDA applicant is required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved drug in the Orange Book. Specifically, theapplicant must certify that: (i) the required patent information has not been filed; (ii) the listed patent has expired; (iii) the listed patent has not expired, butwill expire on a particular date and approval is sought after patent expiration; or (iv) the listed patent is invalid or will not be infringed by the new drug. Acertification that the new drug will not infringe the already approved drug’s listed patents or that such patents are invalid is called a Paragraph IVcertification. If the applicant does not challenge the listed patents, the ANDA application will not be approved until all the listed patents claiming thereferenced drug have expired.If the ANDA applicant has provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the applicant must also send notice of the Paragraph IV certification to theNDA and patent holders once the ANDA has been accepted for filing by the FDA. The NDA and patent holders may then initiate a patent infringementlawsuit in response to the notice of the Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days of the receipt of a Paragraph IVcertification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the ANDA until the earlier of 30 months, expiration of the patent, settlement of the lawsuit or adecision in the infringement case that is favorable to the ANDA applicant.The ANDA application also will not be approved until any non-patent exclusivity, such as exclusivity for obtaining approval of a new chemical entity,listed in the Orange Book for the referenced drug has expired. The U.S. Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, more commonlyknown as the “Hatch-Waxman Act,” provides a period of five years following approval of a drug containing no previously approved active ingredients,during which ANDAs for generic versions of those drugs cannot be submitted unless the submission contains a Paragraph IV challenge to a listed patent, inwhich case the submission may be made four years following the original drug approval. Federal law provides for a period of three years of exclusivityfollowing approval of a listed drug that contains previously approved active ingredients but is approved in a new dosage form, route of administration orcombination, or for a new use, the approval of which was required to be supported by new clinical trials conducted by or for the sponsor, during which FDAcannot grant effective approval of an ANDA based on that listed drug. 11 Table of ContentsForeign regulationWhether or not we or our partners obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain approval by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreigncountries before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and thetime may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing andreimbursement also vary greatly from country to country. Although governed by the applicable country, clinical trials conducted outside of the U.S. typicallyare administered with the three-Phase sequential process that is discussed above under “United States government regulation.” However, the foreignequivalent of an IND is not a prerequisite to performing pilot studies or Phase I clinical trials.Under E.U. regulatory systems, we may submit Marketing Authorization Applications (MAAs) either under a centralized or decentralized procedure.The centralized procedure, which is available for drugs produced by biotechnology or which are highly innovative, provides for the grant of a singlemarketing authorization that is valid for all E.U. member states. This authorization is a marketing authorization approval. The decentralized procedureprovides for mutual recognition of national approval decisions. Under this procedure, the holder of a national marketing authorization may submit anapplication to the remaining member states. Within 90 days of receiving the applications and assessment report, each member state must decide whether torecognize approval. This procedure is referred to as the mutual recognition procedure.In addition, regulatory approval of prices is required in most countries other than the U.S. We face the risk that the resulting prices would beinsufficient to generate an acceptable return to us or our partners.Patents and proprietary rights; Hatch-Waxman protectionWe and our partners will be able to protect our products from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our products are covered by validand enforceable patents, either licensed in from third parties or generated internally, that give us or our partners sufficient proprietary rights. Accordingly,patents and other proprietary rights are essential elements of our business.HETLIOZ®, Fanapt®, tradipitant and VQW-765 are covered by new chemical entity and other patents and patent applications. In addition, newchemical entity patent protection has been requested for VTR-297 and CFTR and patent applications for the active ingredients in these products remainpending. For more on these license and sublicense arrangements, see License Agreements above. In addition, we have filed for patents based on our owndiscoveries that seek to provide additional protection for HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®. The primary new chemical entity patent covering Fanapt® expired inNovember 2016.The table below is a summary of Orange Book listed patents for our commercial products. Members of these patent families are also issued or pendingin a number of major market territories, such as Europe and Japan. Number Type HETLIOZ® US 5,856,529 New chemical entity US 9,060,995 Method of treatment US 9,539,234 Method of treatment US 9,549,913 Method of treatment US 9,730,910 Method of treatment US 9,855,241 Method of treatment US RE46604 Method of treatment Fanapt® US 8,586,610 Method of treatment US 8,652,776 Method of treatment US 8,999,638 Method of treatment US 9,072,742 Method of treatment US 9,074,254 Method of treatment US 9,074,255 Method of treatment US 9,074,256 Method of treatment US 9,138,432 Method of treatment US 9,157,121 Method of treatment 12 Table of ContentsHETLIOZ®Our rights to the new chemical entity patent covering HETLIOZ® and related intellectual property have been acquired through a license with BMS.HETLIOZ® and its formulations, genetic markers and uses are covered by a total of 14 patent and patent application families worldwide. The primary newchemical entity patent covering HETLIOZ® expires in December 2018 in the U.S. and expired in 2017 in most other markets. The Hatch-Waxman Actprovides for an extension of new chemical entity patents for a period of up to five years following the normal expiration of the patent covering thatcompound to compensate for time spent in development. We believe that HETLIOZ® will meet the various criteria of the Hatch-Waxman Act and will receivefive additional years of patent protection in the U.S., which would extend its new chemical entity patent protection in the U.S. until 2022. An application forthe five year patent term extension has been filed and is being processed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office hasissued six method of use patents for HETLIOZ® that will expire during 2033 and 2034. Both the new chemical entity patent and the method of use patentsare listed in the Orange Book.In Europe, the law provides for ten years of data exclusivity (with the potential for an additional year if the drug is developed for a significant newindication). As such, in Europe, data exclusivity will protect HETLIOZ® for at least ten years from approval. A completed Pediatric Investigation Plan couldfurther extend this exclusivity for two years in an orphan indication, for a total of 12 years of exclusivity. It is also possible that the term of the new chemicalentity patent in Europe could be extended by issuance of a supplementary protection certificate (SPC). The European Patent Office has granted our patentapplication directed to the 20 mg/day dose. This patent will expire normally in 2027. Patent applications directed to the treatment of Non-24, if granted,would provide exclusivity in Europe for this indication until at least 2033.Outside the U.S. and Europe, data exclusivity will protect HETLIOZ® from generic competition for varying numbers of years depending on thecountry.Additional patent applications directed to specific sleep disorders and to methods of treating patients with HETLIOZ®, if issued, would provideexclusivity for such indications and methods of treatment, potentially extending the effective patent protection period in the U.S., Europe, and other majormarkets.Fanapt®The new chemical entity patent for Fanapt®, which expired in 2016, is owned by Sanofi, and other patents and patent applications relating to Fanapt®previously owned by Novartis are now owned by Vanda. We originally obtained exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize the productscovered by these patents through license and sublicense arrangements. Then, pursuant to an amended sublicense agreement with Novartis, Novartis retainedexclusive commercialization rights to all formulations of Fanapt® in the U.S. and Canada. However, as of December 2014, pursuant to an asset transferagreement, we acquired all rights in Fanapt®, including in the U.S. and Canada.Fanapt® and its metabolites, formulations, genetic markers and uses are covered by a total of 17 patent and patent application families in the U.S.,Europe, and other markets. The primary new chemical entity patent covering Fanapt® expired in November 2016 in the U.S. and expired in 2010 in majormarkets outside the U.S. In November 2013, a patent directed to a method of treating patients with Fanapt® based on genotype was issued to us by the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. This patent, which was listed in the Orange Book in January 2015, is set to expire in 2027, potentially further extending theexclusivity protection of Fanapt®. Additional method of treatment patents were issued and listed in the Orange Book with the latest expected expiry inDecember 2031. See Note 16, Legal Matters, to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II of this annual report on Form 10-K for additionalinformation.In Europe, the law provides for ten years of data exclusivity (with the potential for an additional year if the drug is developed for a significant newindication). No generic versions of Fanapt® would be permitted to be marketed or sold during this 10-year (or 11-year) period in most European countries.Outside the U.S. and Europe, data exclusivity will protect Fanapt® from generic competition for varying numbers of years depending upon the country.Several other patent applications covering metabolites, uses, formulations and genetic markers relating to Fanapt® extend beyond 2020. The patent familyfor the microsphere depot formulation of Fanapt® expires in 2024 in the U.S. and 2022 in most of the major markets in Europe. The patent family for theaqueous microcrystals depot formulation of Fanapt® expires in 2023 in the U.S. and in most of the major markets in Europe.TradipitantLilly owns a new chemical entity patent as well as patent applications directed to polymorphic forms of, and methods of making tradipitant. Thus,tradipitant is covered by a total of three patent and patent application families worldwide, which have been licensed to us. The new chemical entity patentcovering tradipitant expires in 2023, except in the U.S., where it expires normally in 2024 subject to any extension that may be received under Hatch-Waxman. We have filed additional patent applications based on discoveries made during recent studies with tradipitant. 13 Table of ContentsVQW-765Novartis owns a new chemical entity patent as well as patent applications directed to methods of using VQW-765, VQW-765 formulations, andcombinations of VQW-765 with other active pharmaceutical ingredients. The new chemical entity patent expires normally in 2023 in the U.S., Europe, andother markets.VTR-297VTR-297 is a small molecule HDAC inhibitor with potential use as a treatment for several oncology indications. We have pending patent applicationscovering the use of VTR-297 and plan on filing additional applications based on discoveries made throughout the development plan of this molecule.Portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitorsOur portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitors may have broad applicability in addressing a number of high unmet medical needs, including chronicdry eye, constipation, polycystic kidney disease, cholestasis and secretory diarrheas. We plan on filing applications based on discoveries made throughoutthe development plan of these compounds.Other PatentsAside from the new chemical entity patents and other in-licensed patents relating to Fanapt®, HETLIOZ®, tradipitant and VQW-765, we havenumerous patent and patent application families, most of which have been filed in key markets including the U.S., relating to our products and developmentcompounds. In addition, we have several other patent application families relating to drugs not presently in clinical studies. The claims in these variouspatents and patent applications are directed to compositions of matter, including claims covering other products, pharmaceutical compositions and methodsof use.Proprietary Know-howFor proprietary know-how that is not appropriate for patent protection, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and any other elements of ourdiscovery process that involve proprietary know-how and technology that are not covered by patent applications, we generally rely on trade secret protectionand confidentiality agreements to protect our interests. We require all of our employees, consultants and advisors to enter into confidentiality agreements.Where it is necessary to share our proprietary information or data with outside parties, our policy is to make available only that information and data requiredto accomplish the desired purpose and only pursuant to a duty of confidentiality on the part of those parties.Third-Party Reimbursement and Pricing ControlsThe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 (together,PPACA), has changed and is expected to further significantly change the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers. Theprovisions of PPACA became effective over various periods from 2010 through 2014. We cannot predict the complete impact of PPACA on pharmaceuticalcompanies because many of PPACA’s reforms require the promulgation of detailed regulations to implement the statutory provisions, which has not yetoccurred. While we cannot predict the complete impact on federal reimbursement policies this law will have in general or specifically on any product wecommercialize, PPACA may result in downward pressure on pharmaceutical reimbursement, which could negatively affect market acceptance of newproducts. The rebates, discounts, taxes and other costs resulting from PPACA may have a significant effect on our profitability in the future. In addition,potential reductions of the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending under PPACA, could potentially limit access to certain treatments or mandate pricecontrols for our products. Moreover, although the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of most of PPACA, some states have indicated thatthey intend not to implement certain sections of PPACA, and some members of the U.S. Congress are still working to repeal PPACA. We cannot predictwhether these challenges will continue or other proposals will be made or adopted, or what impact these efforts may have on us or our partners.In the U.S. and elsewhere, sales of pharmaceutical products depend in significant part on the availability of reimbursement to the consumer from third-party payors, such as government and private insurance plans. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products andservices. It will be time consuming and expensive for us or our partners to go through the process of seeking reimbursement from Medicare and privatepayors. Our products may not be considered cost-effective, and coverage and reimbursement may not be available or sufficient to allow us or our partners tosell our compounds on a competitive and profitable basis. The passage of the Medicare Prescription Drug and Modernization Act of 2003 imposes additionalrequirements for the distribution and pricing of prescription drugs which may affect the marketing of our products. 14 Table of ContentsIn many foreign markets, including the countries in the E.U. and Japan, pricing of pharmaceutical products is subject to governmental control. In theU.S., there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of federal and state proposals to implement similar governmental pricingcontrol. While we cannot predict whether such legislative or regulatory proposals will be adopted, the adoption of such proposals could have a materialadverse effect on our business, financial condition and profitability.Marketing and SalesHETLIOZ® was approved in the U.S. for the treatment of Non-24 in January 2014 and commercially launched in the U.S. in April 2014. Additionally,HETLIOZ® was approved in the E.U. for the treatment of Non-24 in totally blind adults in July 2015. We commercially launched HETLIOZ® in Germany inAugust 2016.Given the range of potential indications for HETLIOZ®, we may pursue one or more partnerships for the development and commercialization ofHETLIOZ® worldwide.Fanapt® was approved in the U.S. for the treatment of schizophrenia in May 2009 and commercially launched in the U.S. in January 2010. In October2009, we entered into an amended and restated sublicense agreement with Novartis pursuant to which Novartis has exclusive commercialization rights to allformulations of Fanapt® in the U.S. and Canada. Novartis began selling Fanapt® in the U.S. during the first quarter of 2010. Pursuant to the terms of asettlement agreement with Novartis, Novartis transferred all U.S. and Canadian rights in the Fanapt® franchise to Vanda on December 31, 2014.Fanapt® was launched in Israel and Mexico by our distribution partners in 2014. As of December 31, 2017, we no longer have an active distributorrelationship in Mexico. We continue to explore the regulatory path and commercial opportunity for Fanapt® oral formulation in other regions.ManufacturingWe currently utilize a virtual supply manufacturing and distribution chain in which we do not have our own facilities to manufacture commercial orclinical trial supplies of drugs and we do not have our own distribution facilities. Additionally, we do not intend to develop such facilities for any product inthe near future. Instead, we contract with third parties for the manufacture, warehousing, order management, billing and collection and distribution of ourproducts and product candidates.We expect to continue to rely solely on third-party manufacturers to manufacture drug substance and final drug products for both clinical developmentand commercial sale. However, there are numerous factors that could cause interruptions in the supply of our products, including regulatory reviews, changesin our sources for manufacturing, disputes with a manufacturer, or financial instability of manufacturers, all of which could negatively impact our operationand our financial results.We have agreements in place with Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Patheon Inc. (collectively, Patheon), subsidiaries of Thermo Fisher Scientific, forthe manufacture of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®.In January 2014, we entered into a manufacturing agreement with Patheon for the manufacture of commercial supplies of HETLIOZ® 20 mg capsules atPatheon’s Cincinnati, Ohio manufacturing site. Under the HETLIOZ® manufacturing agreement, we are responsible for supplying the active pharmaceuticalingredient for HETLIOZ® to Patheon and have agreed to certain minimum yearly order requirements. Patheon is responsible for manufacturing theHETLIOZ® 20 mg capsules, conducting quality control and stability testing, and packaging the HETLIOZ® capsules. The HETLIOZ® manufacturingagreement has an initial term of five years and will automatically renew after the initial term for successive terms of one year each, unless either party givesnotice of its intention to terminate the agreement at least twelve months prior to the end of the then current term. Either party may terminate the HETLIOZ®manufacturing agreement under certain circumstances upon specified written notice to the other party.As part of a settlement agreement, we assumed Novartis’ manufacturing agreement with Patheon for the manufacture of commercial supplies ofFanapt®. In May 2016, we entered into a new manufacturing agreement with Patheon for the manufacture of commercial supplies of Fanapt® 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10and 12 mg tablets at Patheon’s Mississauga, Ontario, Canada manufacturing site. Under the Fanapt® manufacturing agreement, we are responsible forsourcing the supply of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (iloperidone), and have agreed to order from Patheon at least 70% of the total yearly requirementof new units of Fanapt® tables for the U.S. and other specified countries each year for the term of the agreement. The Fanapt® manufacturing agreement has aninitial term of five years and will automatically renew after the initial term for successive terms of one year each, unless either party gives notice of itsintention to terminate the agreement at least twelve months prior to the end of the then current term. Either party may terminate the Fanapt® manufacturingagreement under certain circumstances upon specified written notice to the other party. 15 Table of ContentsResearch and DevelopmentWe have built a research and development organization that includes extensive expertise in the scientific disciplines of pharmacogenetics andpharmacogenomics. We operate cross-functionally and are led by an experienced research and development management team. We use rigorous projectmanagement techniques to assist us in making disciplined strategic research and development program decisions and to help limit the risk profile of ourproduct pipeline. We also access relevant market information and key opinion leaders in creating target product profiles and, when appropriate, as weadvance our programs towards commercialization. We engage third parties to conduct portions of our preclinical research. In addition, we utilize multipleclinical sites to conduct our clinical trials; however, we are not substantially dependent upon any one of these sites for our clinical trials nor do any of themconduct a major portion of our clinical trials.Research and development expenses amounted to $38.5 million, $29.2 million and $29.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and2015, respectively.Major CustomersOur revenues are generated from product sales and are concentrated with specialty pharmacies and wholesalers. There were six major customers thateach accounted for more than 10% of total revenues and, as a group, represented 95% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017.CompetitionThe pharmaceutical industry, in particular, is highly competitive and includes a number of established large and mid-sized companies with greaterfinancial, technical and personnel resources than we have and significantly greater commercial infrastructures than we have. Our market segment alsoincludes several smaller emerging companies whose activities are directly focused on our target markets and areas of expertise. Our products, once approvedfor commercial use, will compete with numerous therapeutic treatments offered by these competitors. While we believe that our products will have certainfavorable features, existing and new treatments may also possess advantages. Additionally, the development of other drug technologies and methods ofdisease prevention are occurring at a rapid pace. These developments may render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.We believe the primary competitors for HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® are as follows: • For HETLIOZ® in the treatment of Non-24, there are no FDA approved direct competitors. Sedative-Hypnotic treatments for certain sleep relateddisorders include, Ambien® (zolpidem) by Sanofi (including Ambien CR®), Lunesta® (eszopiclone) by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sonata®(zaleplon) by Pfizer Inc., Rozerem® (ramelteon) by Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, Silenor® (doxepin) by Pernix Therapeutics,Belsomra® (suvorexant) by Merck & Co., Inc., generic products such as zolpidem, trazodone and doxepin, and over-the-counter remedies such asBenadryl® and Tylenol PM®. The class of melatonin agonists includes Rozerem® (ramelteon) by Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited,Valdoxan® (agomelatine) by Servier, Circadin® (long-acting melatonin) by Neurim Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and the food supplement melatonin.Shift work and excessive sleepiness disorder treatments include Nuvigil® (armodafinil) and Provigil® (modafinil) both by Teva PharmaceuticalIndustries Ltd. • For Fanapt® in the treatment of schizophrenia, the atypical antipsychotics competitors are Risperdal® (risperidone), including the depotformulation Risperdal Consta® and Invega® (paliperidone), including the depot formulation Invega® Sustenna®, each by Ortho-McNeil-JanssenPharmaceuticals, Inc., Zyprexa® (olanzapine), including the depot formulation Zyprexa® Relprevv™, each by Eli Lilly and Company,Seroquel® and Seroquel XR® (quetiapine) by AstraZeneca PLC, Abilify® (aripiprazole) by Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., AbilifyMaintena® (the depot formulation of Abilify®) by Lundbeck/Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., Geodon® (ziprasidone) by Pfizer Inc.,Saphris® (asenapine) by Allergan plc, Latuda® (lurasidone) by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Rexulti® (brexpiprazole) by Lundbeck/OtsukaAmerica Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aristada™ (aripiprazole lauroxil) extended-release injectible suspension by Alkermes, Inc., Vraylar™ (cariprazine)by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and generic clozapine, as well as the typical antipsychotics haloperidol, chlorpromazine, thioridazine,and sulpiride (all of which are generic).Our ability to compete successfully will depend in part on our ability to utilize our pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics and drug developmentexpertise to identify, develop, secure rights to and obtain regulatory approvals for promising pharmaceutical products before others are able to developcompetitive products. Our ability to compete successfully will also depend on our ability to attract and retain skilled and experienced personnel.Additionally, our ability to compete may be affected because insurers and other third-party payors in some cases seek to encourage the use of cheaper,generic products, which could make our products less attractive. 16 Table of ContentsEmployeesWe had 273 full-time employees as of December 31, 2017, compared with 142 employees as of December 31, 2016. None of our employees arerepresented by a labor union. We have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our employee relations to be good.Corporate InformationWe were incorporated in Delaware in 2002. Our principal executive offices are located at 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 300E, WashingtonD.C. 20037, and our telephone number is (202) 734-3400. Our website address is www.vandapharma.com and the information contained in, or that can beaccessed through, our website is not part of this annual report and should not be considered part of this annual report.Available InformationWe file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Roomat 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regardingissuers, including us, that file electronically with the SEC.We also make available free of charge on our Internet website at www.vandapharma.com our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and, if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act assoon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.Our code of ethics, other corporate policies and procedures, and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee andNominating/Corporate Governance Committee are available through our Internet website at www.vandapharma.com. ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORSOur business, financial condition and operating results can be affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including butnot limited to those described below, any one or more of which could, directly or indirectly, cause our actual operating results and financial condition tovary materially from past, or anticipated future, operating results and financial condition. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially andadversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and the price of our common stock.The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be important to understanding any statement inthis annual report on Form 10-K or elsewhere. The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements andrelated notes in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements and Part I, Item 2, Management’s, Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations.Because of the following factors, as well as other factors affecting our financial condition and operating results, past financial performance shouldnot be considered to be a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in futureperiods.Risks related to our business and industryWe are dependent on the commercial success of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®.Our future success is currently substantially dependent upon the commercial success of HETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24-Hour Sleep-WakeDisorder (Non-24) and Fanapt® for the treatment of schizophrenia.In January 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved our New Drug Application (NDA) for HETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24and in April 2014, we commenced the U.S. commercial launch of HETLIOZ®. In July 2015, the European Commission (EC) granted centralized marketingauthorization with unified labeling for HETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24 in totally blind adults, and in August 2016 we commenced the commerciallaunch of HETLIOZ® in Germany. This authorization is valid in the 28 countries that are members of the European Union (E.U.), as well as EuropeanEconomic Area members Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. 17 Table of ContentsIn the first quarter of 2015, we acquired the U.S. commercial rights to Fanapt®, and began selling, marketing and distributing Fanapt® in the U.S.Our ability to generate significant product revenue from sales of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®, both in the U.S. and abroad, in the near term will depend on,among other things, our ability to: • defend our patents and intellectual property from generic competition; • maintain commercial manufacturing arrangements with third-party manufacturers; • produce, through a validated process, sufficiently large quantities of inventory of our products to meet demand; • continue to maintain and grow a wide variety of internal sales, distribution and marketing capabilities sufficient to sustain growth in sales of ourproducts; • gain broad acceptance of our products from physicians, health care payors, patients, pharmacists and the medical community; • properly price and obtain adequate coverage and reimbursement of these products by governmental authorities, private health insurers, managedcare organizations and other third-party payors; • maintain compliance with ongoing labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, recordkeeping, safety and other post-marketrequirements; • obtain regulatory approval to expand the labeling of our approved products for additional indications; • obtain regulatory approval for HETLIOZ® or Fanapt® in additional countries; • adequately protect against and effectively respond to any claims by holders of patents and other intellectual property rights that our productsinfringe their rights; and • adequately protect against and effectively respond to any unanticipated adverse effects or unfavorable publicity that develops in respect to ourproducts, as well as the emergence of new or existing competitive products, which may be proven to be more clinically effective and cost-effective.We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and to utilize a substantial portion of our cash resources as we continue the commercialization ofHETLIOZ® and Fanapt®, evaluate foreign market opportunities for HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® and continue to grow our operational capabilities, bothdomestically and abroad. This activity represents a significant investment in the commercial success of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®, which is uncertain.If our continued commercial efforts are not successful with respect to HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® in the U.S., Europe or other jurisdictions in which theseproducts may be approved for sale, our ability to generate increased product sales revenue may be jeopardized and, consequently, our business may beseriously harmed.The cost of growing and maintaining a sales, marketing and distribution organization may exceed its cost effectiveness. If we fail to continue todevelop sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, if sales efforts are not effective or if costs of developing sales, marketing and distribution capabilitiesexceed their cost effectiveness, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.Growth of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® may be slow or limited for a variety of reasons including competing products or unanticipated safety issues. Ifeither HETLIOZ® or Fanapt® is not successful in gaining broad commercial acceptance, our business would be harmed.Any increase in sales of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® will be dependent on several factors, including our ability to educate physicians and to increasephysician awareness of the benefits and cost-effectiveness of our products relative to competing products. The degree of further market acceptance of any ofour products or market acceptance of approved product candidates among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community will dependon a number of factors, including but not limited to: • acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy; • relative convenience and ease of administration; • the prevalence and severity of any adverse side effects; • availability of alternative treatments; and • pricing and cost effectiveness. 18 Table of ContentsIn addition, HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® are subject to continual review by the FDA, and we cannot assure that newly discovered or reported safety issueswill not arise. With the use of any newly marketed drug by a wider patient population, serious adverse events may occur from time to time that initially donot appear to relate to the drug itself. Any safety issues could cause us to suspend or cease marketing of our approved products, cause us to modify how wemarket our approved products, subject us to substantial liabilities and adversely affect our revenues and financial condition. In the event of a withdrawal ofeither HETLIOZ® or Fanapt® from the market, our revenues would decline significantly and our business would be seriously harmed.We may enter into third party collaborations from time to time in order to commercialize our products. If we are unable to identify or enter into anagreement with any material third-party collaborator, if our collaborations with any such third-party are not commercially successful or if ouragreement with any such third-party is terminated or allowed to expire, we could be adversely affected financially or our business reputation could beharmed.Our business strategy includes entering into collaborations with corporate collaborators for the commercialization of HETLIOZ®, Fanapt® and ourother products. Areas in which we may potentially enter into third-party collaboration arrangements include joint sales and marketing arrangements for salesand marketing in certain E.U. countries and elsewhere outside of the U.S., and future product development arrangements. If we are unable to identify or enterinto an agreement with any material third-party collaborator, this could result in an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.Any arrangements we do enter into may not be scientifically or commercially successful. The termination of any of these arrangements might adversely affectour ability to develop, commercialize and market our products.The success of our collaboration arrangements will depend heavily on the efforts and activities of our collaborators. Our collaborators will havesignificant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations. We expect that the risks which we face inconnection with these future collaborations will include the following: • our collaboration agreements are expected to be for fixed terms and subject to termination under various circumstances, including, in manycases, on short notice without cause; • our collaborators may develop and commercialize, either alone or with others, products and services that are similar to or competitive with ourproducts which are the subject of their collaboration with us; and • our collaborators may change the focus of their commercialization efforts.In recent years there have been a significant number of mergers and consolidations in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, some of whichhave resulted in the participant companies reevaluating and shifting the focus of their business following the completion of these transactions. The ability ofour products to reach their potential could be limited if any of our future collaborators decreases or fails to increase spending relating to such products.Collaborations with pharmaceutical companies and other third-parties often are terminated or allowed to expire by the other party. With respect to ourfuture collaborations, any such termination or expiration could adversely affect us financially as well as harm our business reputation.Even after we or our partners obtain regulatory approvals of a product, acceptance of the product in the marketplace is uncertain and failure toachieve commercial acceptance will prevent or delay our ability to generate significant revenue from such product.Even after obtaining regulatory approvals for the sale of our products, the commercial success of these products will depend, among other things, ontheir acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and other members of the medical community as therapeutic and cost-effective alternatives tocompeting products and treatments. The degree of market acceptance of any product will depend on a number of factors, including the demonstration of itssafety and efficacy, its cost-effectiveness, its potential advantages over other therapies, the reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors withrespect to such product, our ability to attract and maintain corporate partners, including pharmaceutical companies, to assist in commercializing our products,receipt of regulatory clearance of marketing claims for the uses that we or our partners are developing and the effectiveness of our and our partners’ marketingand distribution capabilities. If our approved products fail to gain market acceptance or do not become widely accepted by physicians, patients, third-partypayors and other members of the medical community, it is unlikely that we will ever become profitable on a sustained basis or achieve significant revenues. 19 Table of ContentsWe rely and will continue to rely on outsourcing arrangements for many of our activities, including clinical development and supply of HETLIOZ®,Fanapt® and our other products.As of December 31, 2017, we had 273 full-time employees, including our sales team. We rely on outsourcing arrangements for a significant portion ofour activities, including distribution, clinical research and development, data collection and analysis and manufacturing, as well as for certain functions as apublic company. We have limited control over these third parties and we cannot guarantee that they will perform their obligations in an effective and timelymanner.Disruptions to our HETLIOZ® or Fanapt® supply chains could materially affect our level of success in commercializing HETLIOZ® or Fanapt®,thereby reducing our future earnings and prospects.A loss or disruption with any one of our manufacturers or suppliers could disrupt the supply of HETLIOZ® or Fanapt®, possibly for a significant timeperiod, and we may not have sufficient inventories to maintain supply before the manufacturer or supplier could be replaced or the disruption is resolved. Inaddition, marketed drugs and their contract manufacturing organizations are subject to continual review, including review and approval of theirmanufacturing facilities and the manufacturing processes, which can result in delays in the regulatory approval process and/or commercialization.Introducing a replacement or backup manufacturer or supplier for HETLIOZ® or Fanapt® requires a lengthy regulatory and commercial process and there canbe no guarantee that we could obtain necessary regulatory approvals in a timely fashion or at all. In addition, it is difficult to identify and select qualifiedsuppliers and manufacturers with the necessary technical capabilities, and establishing new supply and manufacturing sources involves a lengthy andtechnical engineering process.Failure to comply with government regulations regarding the sale and marketing of our products could harm our business.Pharmaceutical companies are subject to extensive government regulation and oversight by government authorities in countries in which they dobusiness. As a result, we may become subject to governmental actions which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations andfinancial condition, certain of which are described below.Pharmaceutical Pricing and ReimbursementIn U.S. markets, our ability and that of our partners to commercialize our products successfully, and to attract commercialization partners for ourproducts, depends in significant part on the availability of adequate financial coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, including, in the U.S.,governmental payors such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs, managed care organizations, and private health insurers.We participate in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program for both HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®. Under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, we are required topay a rebate to each state Medicaid program for our covered outpatient drugs that are dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries and paid for by a state Medicaidprogram as a condition of having our drugs eligible for coverage under Medicaid and Medicare Part B. Those rebates are based on pricing data that arereported by us on a monthly and quarterly basis to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Federal law requires that any company thatparticipates in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program also participate in the Public Health Service’s 340B drug pricing discount program (340B program), inorder for the manufacturer’s drugs to be eligible for coverage under Medicaid and Medicare Part B. The 340B program requires participating manufacturers toagree to charge statutorily-defined covered entities no more than the 340B “ceiling price” for the manufacturer’s covered outpatient drugs. The ceiling pricecan represent a significant discount and is based on the pricing data reporting to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program.The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 (together,PPACA) expanded the 340B program to include additional entity types: certain free-standing cancer hospitals, critical access hospitals, rural referral centersand sole community hospitals, each as defined by PPACA. PPACA exempts drugs designated under section 526 of the FDC Act as “orphan drugs” from theceiling price requirements for these newly-eligible entities.PPACA also obligates the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to create regulations and processes to improve the integrity of the340B program and to update the agreement that manufacturers must sign to participate in the 340B program. HRSA issued a final regulation in January of2017 regarding the calculation of the 340B ceiling price and the imposition of civil monetary penalties on manufacturers that knowingly and intentionallyovercharge covered entities, although that regulation has been withdrawn and is not currently applicable. The withdrawn final regulation regarding the 340Bprogram included a requirement that a manufacturer calculate the 340B ceiling price on a quarterly basis, the requirement that a manufacturer charge $0.01per unit of measure if the 340B ceiling price calculation results in a ceiling price that equals zero (penny pricing), the methodology manufacturers must usewhen estimating the ceiling price for a new covered outpatient drug, an explanation of how a civil monetary penalty (CMP) would be imposed on amanufacturer that knowingly and intentionally overcharges a covered entity; and an explanation of what would constitute an instance of overcharging totrigger a CMP. HRSA recently issued a proposed regulation regarding an administrative 20 Table of Contentsdispute resolution process for the 340B program. Any final regulations and guidance could affect our obligations under the 340B program in ways we cannotanticipate. In addition, legislation may be introduced that, if passed, would further expand the 340B program to additional covered entities or otherwiseexpand the 340B program.Federal law also requires that for a drug manufacturer’s products to be eligible for coverage under the Medicaid and Medicare Part B programs and tobe purchased by certain federal agencies and grantees, the manufacturer must participate in the Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Supply Schedule(FSS), pricing program, established by Section 603 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992. Manufacturers that participate in the FSS pricing program mustlist their covered (innovator and authorized generic) drugs on an FSS contract and charge no more than Federal Ceiling Price (FCP), to the Department ofVeterans Affairs, Department of Defense, Public Health Service, and Coast Guard when those agencies purchase from the FSS contract or a depot contract.FCP is calculated based on non-federal average manufacturer price data, which manufacturers must submit quarterly and annually. In addition, because ourproducts are available in the retail and specialty pharmacy setting, we are required to provide rebates to the Department of Defense for prescriptionsdispensed to Tricare beneficiaries from Tricare retail network pharmacies under the Tricare Retail Refund Program. To the extent we choose to participate inthese government healthcare programs for our current and future products, these and other requirements may affect our ability to profitably sell any productfor which we obtain marketing approval.Pricing and rebate calculations vary among products and programs. The calculations are complex and will often be subject to interpretation by us,governmental or regulatory agencies and the courts. If we become aware that our reporting of pricing data for a prior quarter was incorrect, we will beobligated to resubmit the corrected data. For the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, corrected data must be submitted for a period not to exceed 12 quarters fromthe quarter in which the data originally were due. Such restatements and recalculations increase our costs for complying with the laws and regulationsgoverning the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and other governmental pricing programs.We may be liable for errors associated with our submission of pricing data. If we are found to have knowingly submitted false pricing data to theMedicaid program or the FSS pricing program, we may be liable for civil monetary penalties in the amount of up to $100,000 per item of false information.Our failure to submit pricing data to the Medicaid program or the FSS pricing program on a timely basis could result in a civil monetary penalty of $10,000per day for each day the information is late. Such failure also could be grounds for CMS to terminate our Medicaid drug rebate agreement, which is theagreement under which we would participate in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. In the event that CMS terminates our rebate agreement, our products mayno longer be eligible for coverage under Medicaid or Medicare Part B. There can be no assurance that our submissions will not be found to be incomplete orincorrect.Third-party payors decide which drugs they will cover and establish reimbursement and co-pay levels. Third-party payors are increasingly challengingthe prices charged for medical products and services and examining their cost effectiveness, in addition to their safety and efficacy. We may need to conductexpensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the cost effectiveness of our products. Even with such studies, any of our products that arecommercialized may be considered less cost-effective than other products, and third-party payors may not provide coverage and reimbursement, in whole orin part, for our products.Political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry in the U.S. to fundamental changes. There have been, and weexpect there will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system and reimbursement systems in ways that could impactour ability and that of our partners to profitably sell commercialized products.Payors also are increasingly considering new metrics as the basis for reimbursement rates. It is difficult to project the impact of these evolvingreimbursement mechanics on the willingness of payors to cover any of our commercialized products.In addition, we anticipate that a significant portion of our or our partners’ revenue from sales of commercialized products will be obtained throughgovernment payors, including Medicare and Medicaid. Any failure to obtain eligibility for coverage under those programs for products we are able tocommercialize would have a material adverse effect on revenues and royalties from sales of such products. 21 Table of ContentsInteractions with Healthcare ProvidersPhysicians and other healthcare providers often play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of pharmaceutical products. Manufacturersof branded prescription drugs are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business orfinancial arrangements and relationships through which manufacturers market, sell and distribute the products for which they obtain marketing approval.Some of the laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate are described below.Anti-Kickback LawsThe federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration,directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward the purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease, or order of any health careitem or service reimbursable under federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted toinclude anything of value, and the government can establish a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute without proving that a person or entity had actualknowledge of the law or specific intent to violate it. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on theone hand and prescribers, purchasers, patients, and formulary managers on the other. There are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harborsprotecting certain common activities from prosecution or other regulatory sanctions, however, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly. Failure tomeet all of the requirements of a particular statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-KickbackStatute, but the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on the totality of the facts and circumstances. A number of statesalso have anti-kickback laws that establish similar prohibitions that may apply to items or services reimbursed by government programs, as well as any third-party payors, including commercial payors. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute are punishable by imprisonment, criminal fines, civil monetary penaltiesand exclusion from the participation in federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid.Prescription Drug Marketing ActAs part of the sales and marketing process, pharmaceutical companies frequently provide healthcare providers with samples of approved drugs. ThePrescription Drug Marketing Act (PDMA) imposes requirements and limitations upon the distribution of drugs and drug samples, and prohibits states fromlicensing distributors of prescription drugs unless the state licensing program meets certain federal guidelines that include minimum standards for storage andhandling, as well as record keeping and other requirements. Violations of the PDMA may result in criminal and civil penalties. In addition, the PPACAimposes annual reporting requirements related to sample distribution.False Claims ActThe federal civil False Claims Act prohibits, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented false or fraudulent claims forpayment of government funds and knowingly making, or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false claim paid. Certain marketingpractices may implicate the federal civil False Claims Act, including promotion of pharmaceutical products for unapproved uses, providing free product tocustomers with the expectation that the customer would bill federal programs for the product, or inflating prices reported to private price publication servicesused to set drug reimbursement rates under federal healthcare programs. In addition, PPACA amended the Social Security Act to provide that a claimincluding items or services resulting from a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. Actionsunder the False Claims Act may be brought by the government or as a qui tam action by a private individual in the name of the government. False Claims Actliability is potentially significant in the healthcare industry because the statute provides for treble damages and mandatory penalties of $5,500 to $11,000per false claim or statement, which increased to a range of $10,957 to $21,916 in February 2017. Violations of the False Claims Act are also punishable byexclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Pharmaceutical and other life sciences companies often resolveallegations without admissions of liability for significant and sometimes material amounts to avoid the uncertainty of treble damages and per claim penaltiesthat may awarded in litigation proceedings. They may be required, however, to enter into corporate integrity agreements with the government, which mayimpose substantial costs on companies to ensure compliance.Health Insurance Portability and Accountability ActThe federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), includes federal criminal statutory provisions that prohibit amongother actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-partypayors, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcareoffense, and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement inconnection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. 22 Table of ContentsHIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) and their implementing regulations,impose certain requirements and restrictions on certain types of individuals and entities relating to the privacy and security of individually identifiablehealth information. Among other things, HITECH makes HIPAA’s security standards directly applicable not only to covered entities (e.g. health careproviders and health plans), but also to business associates, i.e., independent contractors or agents of covered entities that receive or obtain protected healthinformation in connection with providing a service for or on behalf of a covered entity. HITECH also created four new tiers of civil monetary penalties,amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civilactions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civilactions.Physician Payment Sunshine ActThe federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is availableunder Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually (with certain exceptions) to CMS, information related to paymentsor other “transfers of value” made to physicians and teaching hospitals, and requires applicable manufacturers and group purchasing organizations to reportannually to CMS ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members and payments or other ‘‘transfers of value’’ tosuch physician owners. Failure to report relevant data may result in civil fines and/or penalties.Foreign Corrupt Practices ActThe U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), prohibits U.S. corporations and their representatives and intermediaries from offering, promising,authorizing or making payments to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate in an attempt to obtain orretain business abroad. The scope of the FCPA includes interactions with certain healthcare professionals in many countries. Other countries have enactedsimilar anti-corruption laws and/or regulations.Analogous State and Foreign LawsMany states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal laws described above, including state anti-kickback and false claims laws. Inaddition to requiring reporting transfers of value, some states have imposed price reporting requirements, and an increasing number of countries worldwidehave either adopted or are considering similar laws requiring disclosure of various interactions with healthcare professionals. These state laws apply to itemsand services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor. In addition, a number of states requirepharmaceutical companies to report expenses relating to the marketing and promotion of pharmaceutical products and to report gifts and payments toindividual physicians in the states. Other states restrict when pharmaceutical companies may provide meals to prescribers or engage in other marketingrelated activities, or require pharmaceutical companies to implement compliance programs or marketing codes of conduct. Compliance with these lawsrequires significant resources and companies that do not comply may face civil penalties or other consequences.Outside the U.S., we are subject to similar regulations in those countries where we market and sell products, including with respect to transparency,bribery and other laws mentioned above. In some foreign countries, including major markets in the E.U. and Japan, the pricing of prescriptionpharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take nine to twelve months orlonger after the receipt of regulatory marketing approval for a product. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be required toconduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product to other available therapies. Our business could be materially harmed ifreimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels.Additionally, drug prices are under significant scrutiny, and along with other health care costs, continue to be subject to intense political and societalpressures, which we anticipate will continue and escalate, including on a global basis. As a result, our business and reputation may be harmed, our stock pricemay be adversely impacted and experience periods of volatility, and our results of operations may be adversely impacted.Other Laws and RegulationsThere are evolving legal requirements and other statutory and regulatory regimes that will continue to affect our business.Efforts to ensure that business activities and business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations can be costly formanufacturers of branded prescription products. If a manufacturer’s operations, including activities conducted by its sales or marketing teams, are found to bein violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that apply to the company, the company may be subject to significant civil, criminaland administrative sanctions, including imprisonment, monetary penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, suchas Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of operations. 23 Table of ContentsWe intend to seek regulatory approvals for our products in additional foreign jurisdictions, but we may not obtain any such approvals.We intend to market our products, alone or with others, in foreign jurisdictions. In order to market our products in foreign jurisdictions, we or ourpartners may be required to obtain separate regulatory approvals and to comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedurevaries among countries and jurisdictions and can involve additional trials, and the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtainFDA approval. Additionally, the foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. For all of thesereasons, we or our partners may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval byregulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authoritiesin other foreign countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. We or our partners may not be able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive necessaryapprovals to commercialize our products in any market. The failure to obtain these approvals could harm our business materially.We rely on a limited number of specialty pharmacies for distribution of HETLIOZ® in the U.S., and the loss of one or more of these specialtypharmacies or their failure to distribute HETLIOZ® effectively would materially harm our business.HETLIOZ® is only available for distribution through a limited number of specialty pharmacies in the U.S. A specialty pharmacy is a pharmacy thatspecializes in the dispensing of medications for complex or chronic conditions, which often require a high level of patient education and ongoingmanagement. The use of specialty pharmacies involves certain risks, including, but not limited to, risks that these specialty pharmacies will: • not provide us accurate or timely information regarding their inventories, the number of patients who are using HETLIOZ® or complaints aboutHETLIOZ®; • reduce their efforts or discontinue to sell or support or otherwise not effectively sell or support HETLIOZ®; • not devote the resources necessary to sell HETLIOZ® in the volumes and within the time frames that we expect; • be unable to satisfy financial obligations to us or others; or • cease operations.In addition, if one or more of our specialty pharmacies do not fulfill their contractual obligations to us, or refuse or fail to adequately serve patients, ortheir agreements are terminated without adequate notice, shipments of HETLIOZ®, and associated revenues, would be adversely affected. We expect that itwould take a significant amount of time if we were required to replace one or more of our specialty pharmacies.Our revenues from Fanapt® are substantially dependent on sales through a limited number of wholesalers, and such revenues may fluctuate fromquarter to quarter.We sell Fanapt® primarily through a limited number of pharmaceutical wholesalers in the U.S. The use of pharmaceutical wholesalers involves certainrisks, including, but not limited to, risks that these pharmaceutical wholesalers will: • not provide us accurate or timely information regarding their inventories, demand from wholesaler customers buying Fanapt® or complaintsabout Fanapt®; • reduce their efforts or discontinue to sell or support or otherwise not effectively sell or support Fanapt®; • not devote the resources necessary to sell Fanapt® in the volumes and within the time frames that we expect; • be unable to satisfy financial obligations to us or others; or • cease operations.Additionally, our reliance on a small number of wholesalers could cause revenues to fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the buying patterns ofthese wholesalers. In addition, if any of these wholesalers fails to pay on a timely basis or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operationscould be materially adversely affected. 24 Table of ContentsWe face substantial competition, which may result in others developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.Our future success will depend on our or our partners’ ability to demonstrate and maintain a competitive advantage with respect to our products andour ability to identify and develop additional products. Large, fully integrated pharmaceutical companies, either alone or together with collaborativepartners, have substantially greater financial resources and have significantly greater experience than we do in: • developing products; • undertaking pre-clinical testing and clinical trials; • obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of products; and • manufacturing, marketing and selling products.These companies may invest heavily and quickly to discover and develop novel products that could make our products obsolete. Accordingly, ourcompetitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection, receiving FDA or foreign regulatory approval or commercializing superior products or othercompeting products before we do. Technological developments or the FDA or foreign regulatory approval of new therapeutic indications for existingproducts may make our products obsolete or may make them more difficult to market successfully, any of which could have a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, results of operations and financial condition.Our products, if successfully developed and approved for commercial sale, will compete with a number of drugs and therapies currently manufacturedand marketed by major pharmaceutical and other biotechnology companies. Our products may also compete with new products currently under developmentby others or with products which may cost less than our products. Physicians, patients, third party payors and the medical community may not accept orutilize any of our products that may be approved. If HETLIOZ®, Fanapt® and our other products, if and when approved, do not achieve significant marketacceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected. We believe the primary competitors forHETLIOZ® and Fanapt® are as follows: • For HETLIOZ® in the treatment of Non-24, there are no FDA approved direct competitors. Sedative-Hypnotic treatments for certain sleep relateddisorders include, Ambien® (zolpidem) by Sanofi (including Ambien CR®), Lunesta® (eszopiclone) by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sonata®(zaleplon) by Pfizer Inc., Rozerem® (ramelteon) by Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, Silenor® (doxepin) by Pernix Therapeutics,Belsomra® (suvorexant) by Merck & Co., Inc., generic products such as zolpidem, trazodone and doxepin, and over-the-counter remedies such asBenadryl® and Tylenol PM®. The class of melatonin agonists includes Rozerem® (ramelteon) by Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited,Valdoxan® (agomelatine) by Servier, Circadin® (long-acting melatonin) by Neurim Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and the food supplement melatonin.Shift work and excessive sleepiness disorder treatments include Nuvigil® (armodafinil) and Provigil® (modafinil) both by Teva PharmaceuticalIndustries Ltd. • For Fanapt® in the treatment of schizophrenia, the atypical antipsychotics competitors are Risperdal® (risperidone), including the depotformulation Risperdal Consta® and Invega® (paliperidone), including the depot formulation Invega® Sustenna®, each by Ortho-McNeil-JanssenPharmaceuticals, Inc., Zyprexa® (olanzapine), including the depot formulation Zyprexa® Relprevv™, each by Eli Lilly and Company,Seroquel® and Seroquel XR® (quetiapine) by AstraZeneca PLC, Abilify® (aripiprazole) by Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., AbilifyMaintena® (the depot formulation of Abilify®) by Lundbeck/Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., Geodon® (ziprasidone) by Pfizer Inc.,Saphris® (asenapine) by Allergan plc, Latuda® (lurasidone) by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Rexulti® (brexpiprazole) by Lundbeck/OtsukaAmerica Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aristada™ (aripiprazole lauroxil) extended-release injectible suspension by Alkermes, Inc., Vraylar™ (cariprazine)by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and generic clozapine, as well as the typical antipsychotics haloperidol, chlorpromazine, thioridazine,and sulpiride (all of which are generic).Additionally, we may face competition from newly developed generic products. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act newly approved drugs and indicationsmay benefit from a statutory period of non-patent marketing exclusivity. The Hatch-Waxman Act seeks to stimulate competition by providing incentives togeneric pharmaceutical manufacturers to introduce non-infringing forms of patented pharmaceutical products and to challenge patents on brandedpharmaceutical products. If we are unsuccessful at challenging an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA), filed pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act,cheaper generic versions of our products, which may be favored by insurers and third-party payors, may be launched commercially, which wouldsignificantly harm our business. 25 Table of ContentsFDA and foreign regulatory approval of our products is uncertain.The research, testing, manufacturing and marketing of products such as those that we have developed or that we or our partners are developing aresubject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local government authorities, including the FDA, as well as foreign regulatory authorities in jurisdictionsin which we seek approval. To obtain regulatory approval of such products, we or our partners must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the applicableregulatory agency that, among other things, the product is safe and effective for its intended use. In addition, we or our partners must show that themanufacturing facilities used to produce such products are in compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations (cGMP).The process of obtaining FDA and other required regulatory approvals and clearances can take many years and will require us and our partners, asapplicable, to expend substantial time and capital. Despite the time and expense expended, regulatory approval is never guaranteed. The number ofpre-clinical and clinical trials that will be required for FDA or foreign regulatory approval varies depending on the product, the disease or condition that theproduct is in development for, and the requirements applicable to that particular product. The FDA or applicable foreign regulatory agency can delay, limit ordeny approval of a product for many reasons, including that: • a product may not be shown to be safe or effective; • the FDA or foreign agency may interpret data from pre-clinical and clinical trials in different ways than we or our partners do; • the FDA or foreign agency may not approve our or our partners’ manufacturing processes or facilities; • a product may not be approved for all the indications we or our partners request; • the FDA or foreign agency may change its approval policies or adopt new regulations; • the FDA or foreign agency may not meet, or may extend, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA-V) date or its foreign equivalent withrespect to a particular NDA or foreign application; and • the FDA or foreign agency may not agree with our or our partners’ regulatory approval strategies or components of the regulatory filings, such asclinical trial designs.For example, if certain of our or our partners’ methods for analyzing trial data are not accepted by the FDA or the applicable foreign agency, we or ourpartners may fail to obtain regulatory approval for our products.Any delay or failure to obtain regulatory approvals for our products will result in increased costs, could diminish competitive advantages that we mayattain and would adversely affect the marketing and sale of our products. Other than HETLIOZ® in the U.S. and the 31 countries in Europe covered by thecentralized marketing authorization by the EC, and Fanapt® in the U.S., Mexico and Israel, we have not received, and may never receive, regulatory approvalto market any of our products in any jurisdiction.Even following regulatory approval of our products, the FDA or the applicable foreign agency may impose limitations on the indicated uses for whichsuch products may be marketed, subsequently withdraw approval or take other actions against us, our partners or such products that are adverse to ourbusiness. The FDA and foreign agencies generally approve drugs for particular indications. An approval for a more limited indication reduces the size of thepotential market for the product. Product approvals, once granted, may be withdrawn or modified if problems occur after initial marketing.We and our partners also are subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and recommendations relating to safe workingconditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices, the environment and the use and disposal of hazardous substances used in connection with discovery,research and development work. In addition, we cannot predict the extent to which new governmental regulations might significantly impede the discovery,development, production and marketing of our products. We or our partners may be required to incur significant costs to comply with current or future laws orregulations, and we may be adversely affected by the cost of such compliance or the inability to comply with such laws or regulations.If our products are determined to be unsafe or ineffective in humans, whether commercially or in clinical trials, our business will be materially harmed.Despite the FDA’s approval of the NDA for HETLIOZ® in January 2014 and the NDA for Fanapt® in May 2009, the EC’s grant of the centralizedmarketing authorization for HETLIOZ® in July 2015, and the positive results of our completed trials for HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®, we are uncertain whethereither of these products will ultimately prove to be effective and safe in humans long term and in all uses. Frequently, products that have shown promisingresults in clinical trials have suffered significant setbacks in later clinical trials or even after they are approved for commercial sale. Future uses of ourproducts, whether in clinical trials or commercially, may reveal that the product is ineffective, unacceptably toxic, has other undesirable side effects, isdifficult to manufacture on a large scale, is uneconomical, infringes on proprietary rights of another party or is otherwise not fit for further use. If our productsare determined to be unsafe or ineffective in humans, our business will be materially harmed. 26 Table of ContentsClinical trials for our products are expensive and their outcomes are uncertain. Any failure or delay in completing clinical trials for our products couldseverely harm our business.Pre-clinical studies and clinical trials required to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our products are time-consuming and expensive and togethertake several years to complete. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any of our products, we or our partners must demonstratethrough preclinical testing and clinical trials that such product is safe and effective for use in humans. We have incurred, and we will continue to incur,substantial expense for, and devote a significant amount of time to, preclinical testing and clinical trials.Historically, the results from preclinical testing and early clinical trials often have not predicted results of later clinical trials. A number of new drugshave shown promising results in clinical trials, but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary regulatoryapprovals. Clinical trials conducted by us, by our partners or by third parties on our or our partners’ behalf may not demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacyto obtain the requisite regulatory approvals for our products. Regulatory authorities may not permit us or our partners to undertake any additional clinicaltrials for our products, may force us to stop any ongoing clinical trials and it may be difficult to design efficacy studies for our products in new indications.Clinical development efforts performed by us or our partners may not be successfully completed, or completed in a timely manner. Completion ofclinical trials may take several years or more. The length of time can vary substantially with the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of the productsand the size of the prospective patient population. Our ability to enroll patients in, and the commencement and rate of completion of, clinical trials for ourproducts may be affected by many factors, including: • the size and nature of the patient population; • the design of the trial protocol for our clinical trials; • the eligibility and exclusion criteria for the trial in question; • the availability of competing therapies and competing clinical trials, and physician and patient perception of our product candidates and ourother product candidates being studied in relation to these other potential options; • the availability of raw materials and the possibility of raw materials expiring prior to their use; • difficulty in maintaining contact with patients after treatment, resulting in incomplete data; • poor effectiveness of our products during clinical trials; • unforeseen safety issues or side effects; • the number and location of clinical sites in our clinical trials; • the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients; • the availability of time and resources at the institutions where clinical trials are and will be conducted; • the availability of adequate financing to fund ongoing clinical trial expenses; • the study endpoints that rely on subjective patient reported outcomes; and • governmental or regulatory delays and changes in regulatory requirements and guidelines.If we or our partners fail to complete successfully, or have difficulty enrolling a sufficient number of patients for, our clinical trials, we or they may notreceive the regulatory approvals needed to market that product. Any such failure or difficulty could have a material adverse effect on our business.Our products may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay, prevent or result in the revocation of their regulatoryapproval or limit their marketability.Undesirable side effects caused by our products could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in the denial of regulatory approval by theFDA or other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications, and in turn prevent us or our partners from commercializing or continuing thecommercialization of such products and generating revenues from their sale. We will continue to assess the side effect profile of our products in ongoingclinical development programs. However, we cannot predict whether the commercial use of our approved products (or our products in development, if andwhen they are approved for commercial use) will produce undesirable or unintended side effects that have not been evident in the use of, or in clinical trialsconducted for, such products to date. Additionally, incidents of product misuse may occur. These events, among others, could result in product recalls,product liability actions or withdrawals or additional regulatory controls, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results ofoperations and financial condition. 27 Table of ContentsIn addition, if after receiving marketing approval of a product, we, our partners or others identify undesirable side effects caused by such product, we orour partners could face one or more of the following: • regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a “black box” warning or a contraindication; • regulatory authorities may withdraw their approval of the product; • we or our partners may be required to change the way the product is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of theproduct; and • our, our partner’s or the product’s reputation may suffer.Any of these events could prevent us or our partners from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product or could substantiallyincrease the costs and expenses of commercializing the product, which in turn could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenues from its sale.We have a history of operating losses, anticipate future losses and may never become profitable on a sustained basis.We have been engaged in identifying and developing products since March 2003, which has required, and will continue to require, significant researchand development expenditures. The continued commercialization of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® will require substantial additional expenditures.As of December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $361.4 million and we cannot estimate with precision the extent of our future losses. InApril 2014, we commercially launched HETLIOZ® in the U.S. for the treatment of Non-24 and in August 2016 we commercially launched HETLIOZ® inGermany for the treatment of Non-24 in totally blind adults. We are currently evaluating the commercial opportunity for HETLIOZ® in the rest of Europe. InDecember 2014, we acquired all rights to Fanapt® from Novartis. The continued commercialization of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® will require substantialadditional expenditures. Novartis launched Fanapt® in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2010 and we began selling Fanapt® on our own in the first quarter of2015. We may not succeed in gaining additional market acceptance of Fanapt® in the U.S. and we may not succeed in commercializing HETLIOZ® orFanapt® outside of the U.S. We may not be profitable even if our products are successfully commercialized. We may be unable to fully develop, obtainregulatory approval for, commercialize, manufacture, market, sell and derive revenue from our products in the timeframes we project, if at all, and ourinability to do so would materially and adversely impact the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue operations.There can be no assurance that we will achieve sustained profitability. Our ability to achieve sustained profitability in the future depends, in part,upon: • our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval for our products, particularly HETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24, both in the U.S. andin foreign countries; • our level of success in commercializing HETLIOZ® in the U.S., Europe and other jurisdictions in which HETLIOZ® may receive regulatoryapproval, if any; • our level of success in raising awareness regarding Non-24 in the medical and patient communities; • our level of success in marketing and selling Fanapt® in the U.S. and our or our partners’ level of success in marketing and selling Fanapt® inIsrael and other jurisdictions in which we may receive regulatory approval, if any; • our ability to enter into and maintain agreements to develop and commercialize our products; • our and our partners’ ability to develop, have manufactured and market our products; • our and our partners’ ability to obtain adequate reimbursement coverage for our products from insurance companies, government programs andother third party payors; and • our ability to obtain additional research and development funding from collaborative partners or funding for our products.In addition, the amount we spend will impact our profitability. Our spending will depend, in part, upon: • the costs of our marketing or awareness campaigns; • the progress of our research and development programs for our products, including clinical trials; 28 Table of Contents • the time and expense that will be required to pursue FDA and/or foreign regulatory approvals for our products and whether such approvals areobtained on a timely basis, if at all; • the time and expense required to prosecute, enforce and/or challenge patent and other intellectual property rights; • the cost of third party manufacturers; • the number of additional products we pursue; • how competing technological and market developments affect our products; • the cost of possible acquisitions of technologies, products, product rights or companies; • the cost of obtaining licenses to use technology owned by others for proprietary products and otherwise; • the costs and effects of potential litigation; and • the costs associated with recruiting and compensating a highly skilled workforce in an environment where competition for such employees maybe intense.We may not achieve all or any of these goals and, thus, we cannot provide assurances that we will ever be profitable on a sustained basis or achievesignificant revenues. Even if we do achieve some or all of these goals, we may not achieve significant or sustained commercial success.Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards to offset future taxable income may be limited as a result oftransactions involving our common stock.In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subjectto limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change net operating losses (NOLs) and certain other tax assets (tax attributes) to offset future taxable income. Ingeneral, an ownership change occurs if the aggregate stock ownership of certain stockholders increases by more than 50 percentage points over suchstockholders’ lowest percentage ownership during the testing period (generally three years). Transactions involving our common stock, even those outsideour control, such as purchases or sales by investors, within the testing period could result in an ownership change. A limitation on our ability to utilize someor all of our NOLs or credits could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. Ownership changes occurred in the years endingDecember 31, 2014 and 2008. We believe that the ownership changes in 2014 and 2008 will not impact our ability to utilize NOL and credit carryforwards;however, future ownership changes may cause our existing tax attributes to have additional limitations.If we fail to obtain the capital necessary to fund our research and development activities and commercialization efforts, we may be unable to continueoperations or we may be forced to share our rights to commercialize our products with third parties on terms that may not be attractive to us.Our activities will necessitate significant uses of working capital throughout 2018 and beyond. It is uncertain whether our existing funds will besufficient to meet our operating needs. As of December 31, 2017, our total cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities were $143.4 million. Our longterm capital requirements are expected to depend on many factors, including, among others: • our level of success in commercializing HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® globally; • outcomes of ongoing and potential patent litigation; • costs of developing and maintaining sales, marketing and distribution channels and our ability to sell our products; • market acceptance of our products; • costs involved in establishing manufacturing capabilities for commercial quantities of our products; • the number of potential formulations and products in development; • progress with pre-clinical studies and clinical trials; • time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory (including FDA) approval; • costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent, trademark and other intellectual property claims; • competing technological and market developments; • costs for recruiting and retaining employees and consultants; 29 Table of Contents • costs for training physicians; and • legal, accounting, insurance and other professional and business related costs.As a result, we may need to raise additional capital to fund our anticipated operating expenses and execute on our business plans. In our capital-raisingefforts, we may seek to sell debt securities or additional equity securities, obtain a bank credit facility, or enter into partnerships or other collaborationagreements. The sale of additional equity or debt securities, if convertible, could result in dilution to our stockholders and may also result in a lower price forour common stock. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could also result in covenants that could restrict ouroperations. However, we may not be able to raise additional funds on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to secure sufficient capital to fund ourplanned activities, we may not be able to continue operations, or we may have to enter into partnerships or other collaboration agreements that could requireus to share commercial rights to our products to a greater extent or at earlier stages in the drug development process than is currently intended. Thesepartnerships or collaborations, if consummated prior to proof-of-efficacy or safety of a given product, could impair our ability to realize value from thatproduct. If additional financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our operations and plannedgrowth, develop or enhance our technologies or products, take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive market pressures, any of whichwould materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.If our contract research organizations do not successfully carry out their duties or if we lose our relationships with contract research organizations, ourdrug development efforts could be delayed.Our arrangements with contract research organizations are critical to our success in bringing our products to the market and promoting such marketedproducts profitably. We are dependent on contract research organizations, third-party vendors and investigators for pre-clinical testing and clinical trialsrelated to our drug discovery and development efforts and we will likely continue to depend on them to assist in our future discovery and developmentefforts. These parties are not our employees and we cannot control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. As such, they may notcomplete activities on schedule or may not conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols. The parties withwhich we contract for execution of our clinical trials play a significant role in the conduct of the trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. Ifthey fail to devote sufficient time and resources to our drug development programs or if their performance is substandard, it will delay the development,approval and commercialization of our products. Moreover, these parties may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which maycompete with us. If they assist our competitors, it could harm our competitive position.Our contract research organizations could merge with or be acquired by other companies or experience financial or other setbacks unrelated to ourcollaboration that could, nevertheless, materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.If we lose our relationship with any one or more of these parties, we could experience a significant delay in both identifying another comparableprovider and then contracting for its services. We may be unable to retain an alternative provider on reasonable terms, if at all. Even if we locate analternative provider, it is likely that this provider may need additional time to respond to our needs and may not provide the same type or level of service asthe original provider. In addition, any provider that we retain will be subject to current Good Laboratory Practices, and similar foreign standards and we donot have control over compliance with these regulations by these providers. Consequently, if these practices and standards are not adhered to by theseproviders, the development and commercialization of our products could be delayed.We rely on a limited number of third party manufacturers to formulate and manufacture our products and our business will be seriously harmed if thesemanufacturers are not able to satisfy our demand and alternative sources are not available.Our expertise is primarily in the research and development and pre-clinical and clinical trial phases of product development. We do not have anin-house manufacturing capability and depend completely on a small number of third-party manufacturers and active pharmaceutical ingredient formulatorsfor the manufacture of our products. Therefore, we are dependent on third parties for our formulation development and manufacturing of our products. Thismay expose us to the risk of not being able to directly oversee the production and quality of the manufacturing process and provide ample commercialsupplies to successfully launch and maintain the marketing of our products. Furthermore, these third party contractors, whether foreign or domestic, mayexperience regulatory compliance difficulty, mechanical shut downs, employee strikes, or other unforeseeable events that may delay or limit production. Ourinability to adequately establish, supervise and conduct (either ourselves or through third parties) all aspects of the formulation and manufacturing processeswould have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop and commercialize our products.We have agreements in place with Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Patheon Inc. (collectively, Patheon), subsidiaries of Thermo Fisher Scientific, forthe manufacture of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®. 30 Table of ContentsIn January 2014, we entered into a manufacturing agreement with Patheon for the manufacture of commercial supplies of HETLIOZ® 20 mg capsules atPatheon’s Cincinnati, Ohio manufacturing site. In May 2016, we entered into a manufacturing agreement with Patheon for the manufacture of commercialsupplies of Fanapt® capsules tablets at Patheon’s Mississauga, Ontario, Canada manufacturing site. We do not have exclusive long-term agreements with anyother third party manufacturers of our products. If our current manufacturers, or any other third party manufacturer, is unable or unwilling to perform itsobligations under our manufacturing agreements for any reason, we may not be able to locate alternative acceptable manufacturers or formulators or enterinto favorable agreements with them. Any inability to acquire sufficient quantities of our products in a timely manner from these third parties could adverselyaffect sales of our products, delay clinical trials and prevent us from developing our products in a cost-effective manner or on a timely basis. In addition,manufacturers of our products are subject to cGMP and similar foreign standards and we do not have control over compliance with these regulations by ourmanufacturers. If one of our contract manufacturers fails to maintain compliance, the production of our products could be interrupted, resulting in delays andadditional costs. In addition, if the facilities of such manufacturers do not pass a pre-approval or post-approval plant inspection, the FDA will not grantapproval and may institute restrictions on the marketing or sale of our products.Our manufacturing strategy presents the following additional risks: • because most of our third-party manufacturers and formulators are located outside of the U.S., there may be difficulties in importing our productsor their components into the U.S. as a result of, among other things, FDA import inspections, incomplete or inaccurate import documentation ordefective packaging; and • because of the complex nature of our products, our manufacturers may not be able to successfully manufacture our products in a cost-effectiveand/or timely manner.Materials necessary to manufacture our products may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, which may delay the development,regulatory approval and commercialization of our products.We and our partners rely on manufacturers to purchase from third-party suppliers the materials necessary to produce our products for clinical trials andcommercialization. Suppliers may not sell these materials to such manufacturers at the times we or our partners need them or on commercially reasonableterms. We do not have any control over the process or timing of the acquisition of these materials by these manufacturers. Moreover, we currently do not haveany agreements for the commercial production of these materials. If the manufacturers are unable to obtain these materials for our or our partners’ clinicaltrials, product testing, potential regulatory approval of our products and commercial scale manufacturing could be delayed, significantly affecting our andour partners’ ability to further develop and commercialize our products. If we, our manufacturers or our partners, as applicable, are unable to purchase thesematerials for our products, there would be a shortage in supply or the commercial launch of such products would be delayed, which would materially andadversely affect our or our partners’ ability to generate revenues from the sale of such products.If we cannot identify, or enter into licensing arrangements for, new products, our ability to develop a diverse product portfolio will be limited.A component of our business strategy is acquiring rights to develop and commercialize products discovered or developed by other pharmaceutical andbiotechnology companies for which we may find effective uses and markets through our unique pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics expertise for thetreatment of central nervous system disorders. Competition for the acquisition of these products is intense. If we are not able to identify opportunities toacquire rights to commercialize additional products, we may not be able to develop a diverse portfolio of products and our business may be harmed.Additionally, it may take substantial human and financial resources to secure commercial rights to promising products. Moreover, if other firms developpharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics capabilities, we may face increased competition in identifying and acquiring additional products.We may not be successful in the development of products for our own account.In addition to our business strategy of acquiring rights to develop and commercialize products, we may develop products for our own account byapplying our technologies to off-patent drugs as well as developing our own proprietary molecules. Because we will be funding the development of suchprograms, there is a risk that we may not be able to continue to fund all such programs to completion or to provide the support necessary to perform theclinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals or market any approved products. We expect the development of products for our own account to consumesubstantial resources. If we are able to develop commercial products on our own, the risks associated with these programs may be greater than thoseassociated with our programs with collaborative partners. 31 Table of ContentsIf we lose key scientists or management personnel, or if we fail to recruit additional highly skilled personnel, it will impair our ability to identify,develop and commercialize products.We are highly dependent on principal members of our management team and scientific staff, including our Chief Executive Officer, Mihael H.Polymeropoulos, M.D. These executives each have significant pharmaceutical industry experience. The loss of any such executives, includingDr. Polymeropoulos, or any other principal member of our management team or scientific staff, would impair our ability to identify, develop and market newproducts. Our management and other employees may voluntarily terminate their employment with us at any time. The loss of the services of these or otherkey personnel, or the inability to attract and retain additional qualified personnel, could result in delays to development or approval, loss of sales anddiversion of management resources. In addition, we depend on our ability to attract and retain other highly skilled personnel, including research scientists.Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and the process of hiring and integrating such qualified personnel is often lengthy. We may be unable torecruit such personnel on a timely basis, if at all, which would negatively impact our development and commercialization programs.Additionally, we do not currently maintain “key person” life insurance on the lives of our executives or any of our employees. This lack of insurancemeans that we may not have adequate compensation for the loss of the services of these individuals.Product liability lawsuits could divert our resources, result in substantial liabilities and reduce the commercial potential of our products.The risk that we may be sued on product liability claims is inherent in the development and sale of pharmaceutical products. For example, we face arisk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our products in clinical trials and will face even greater risks upon commercialization by us or ourpartners of our products. We believe that we may be at a greater risk of product liability claims relative to other pharmaceutical companies because ourproducts are intended to treat central nervous system disorders, and it is possible that we may be held liable for the behavior and actions of patients who useour products. These lawsuits may divert our management from pursuing our business strategy and may be costly to defend. In addition, if we are held liable inany of these lawsuits, we may incur substantial liabilities and we or our partners may be forced to limit or forego further commercialization of one or more ofour products. Although we maintain product liability insurance, our aggregate coverage limit under this insurance is $30.0 million, and while we believe thisamount of insurance is sufficient to cover our product liability exposure, these limits may not be high enough to fully cover potential liabilities. As ourdevelopment activities and commercialization efforts progress and we and our partners sell our products, this coverage may be inadequate, we may be unableto obtain adequate coverage at an acceptable cost or we may be unable to get adequate coverage at all or our insurer may disclaim coverage as to a futureclaim. This could prevent the commercialization or limit the commercial potential of our products. Even if we are able to maintain insurance that we believeis adequate, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected by a product liability claim. Uncertainties resulting fromthe initiation and continuation of products liability litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in themarketplace. Product liability litigation and other related proceedings may also require significant management time.E.U. Member States tend to impose strict price controls, which may delay or prevent the further commercial launch or impede the commercial success ofHETLIOZ® in Europe and adversely affect our future results of operations.In the E.U., prescription drug pricing and reimbursement are subject to governmental control and reimbursement mechanisms used by private andpublic health insurers in the E.U. vary by Member State. For the public systems, reimbursement is determined by guidelines established by the legislature orresponsible national authority. As elsewhere, inclusion in reimbursement catalogues focuses on the medical usefulness, need, quality and economic benefitsto patients and the health care system. Acceptance for reimbursement comes with cost, use and often volume restrictions, which can vary by Member State.Although we have received marketing authorization for HETLIOZ® from the EC, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities may take a considerableamount of time in those Member States that impose price controls. For example, we launched HETLIOZ® commercially in Germany in August 2016, andconcluded our pricing negotiations with German authorities in October 2017. In addition, to obtain reimbursement or pricing approval for HETLIOZ® insome Member States, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of HETLIOZ®, to other available therapies.Some Member States require approval of the sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins aftermarketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some Member States, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmentalcontrol even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we may be subject to lengthy price regulations that delay or prevent the commercial launch ofHETLIOZ® in a particular Member State and negatively impact the revenues that are generated from the sale of HETLIOZ® in that country. If reimbursementof HETLIOZ® is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing for HETLIOZ® is set at unsatisfactory levels or takes too long to establish, or if thereis competition from lower priced cross-border sales, our results of operations will be negatively affected. 32 Table of ContentsWe may not be able to effectively market and sell our future products, if approved, in the U.S.We plan to continue to build our sales and marketing capabilities in the U.S. to commercialize future products, if approved. Our current sales andmarketing capabilities in the U.S. may not be adequate to support the commercialization of future products and we would expect to build such capabilities byinvesting significant amounts of financial and management resources. Furthermore, the cost of establishing and maintaining marketing and sales capabilitiesmay not be justifiable in light of the revenues generated by any future products.If we are unable to establish and maintain adequate sales and marketing capabilities for future products or are unable to do so in a timely manner, wemay not be able to generate product revenues from these products which may prevent us from reaching or maintaining profitability.Legislative or regulatory reform of the healthcare system in the U.S. may affect our ability to sell our products profitably.PPACA substantially changes the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacts the pharmaceuticalindustry. PPACA contains a number of provisions that are expected to impact our business and operations, in some cases in ways we cannot currently predict.Changes that may affect our business if we or our partners commercialize our products in the future include those governing enrollment in federal healthcareprograms, reimbursement changes, rules regarding prescription drug benefits under the health insurance exchanges, and fraud and abuse and enforcement. Inaddition, continued implementation of PPACA may result in the expansion of new programs such as Medicare payment for performance initiatives, and mayimpact existing government healthcare programs, such as by improving the physician quality reporting system and feedback program.Additional provisions of PPACA may negatively affect our revenues from products that we or our partners commercialize in the future. For example, aspart of PPACA’s provisions closing a coverage gap that currently exists in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program, manufacturers of brandedprescription drugs are required to provide a 50% discount on branded prescription drugs dispensed to beneficiaries within this coverage gap. Medicare Part Dis a prescription drug benefit available to all Medicare beneficiaries. It is a voluntary benefit that is implemented through private plans under contractualarrangements with the federal government. Similar to pharmaceutical coverage through private health insurance, Part D plans negotiate discounts from drugmanufacturers and pass on some of those savings to Medicare beneficiaries. PPACA also makes changes to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, discussed inmore detail below, including increasing the minimum rebate from 15.1% to 23.1% of the average manufacturer price for most innovator products. OnFebruary 1, 2016, CMS, the federal agency that administers the Medicare and Medicaid programs, issued final regulations to implement the changes to theMedicaid Drug Rebate Program under PPACA. These regulations became effective on April 1, 2016.Many of PPACA’s most significant reforms did not take effect until 2014 or thereafter, and the resulting new programs and requirements will continueto evolve in the next few years. Some states have chosen not to expand their Medicaid programs by raising the income limit to 133% of the federal povertylevel. In part because not all states have expanded their Medicaid programs, it is unclear whether there will be more uninsured patients than anticipated whenCongress passed PPACA. For each state that has opted not to expand its Medicaid program, there will be fewer insured patients overall. An increase in theproportion of uninsured patients who are prescribed products resulting from our proprietary or partnered programs could impact the future sales of anyproducts that are commercialized in the future and our business and results of operations.Further, in September 2007, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 was enacted giving the FDA enhanced post-marketingauthority including the authority to require post-marketing studies and clinical trials, labeling changes based on new safety information and compliance withRisk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) approved by the FDA. The FDA’s exercise of this authority could result in delays or increased costs duringproduct development, clinical trials and regulatory review, increased costs to ensure compliance with post-approval regulatory requirements and potentialrestrictions on the sale and/or distribution of approved products.In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the U.S. since PPACA was enacted. On August 2, 2011, the Budget ControlAct of 2011 among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked withrecommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering thelegislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% perfiscal year, starting in 2013, which will remain in effect until 2024 unless additional congressional action is taken. On January 2, 2013, the AmericanTaxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recoveroverpayments to providers from three to five years. We expect that additional federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of whichcould limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, and in turn could significantly reduce the projectedvalue of certain development projects and reduce our profitability. 33 Table of ContentsMore recently, the current presidential administration and many members of the U.S. Congress have attempted to repeal and replace PPACA, but theyhave been unsuccessful in doing so as of the date of the filing of this report. We cannot predict the ultimate form or timing of any repeal or replacement ofPPACA or the effect such repeal or replacement would have on our business. Regardless of the impact of repeal or replacement of PPACA on us, thegovernment has shown significant interest in pursuing healthcare reform and reducing healthcare costs.We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federaland state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our products once approved or additionalpricing pressures, and may adversely affect our operating results.Significant developments arising from changes in the political climate could have a material adverse effect on us.Changes in U.S. social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development andinvestment, and any negative sentiments towards the U.S. as a result of such changes, could adversely affect our business.Additionally, in June 2016, the United Kingdom (U.K.) held a referendum and voted in favor of leaving the E.U. In February 2017, the U.K. parliamentvoted to allow the U.K. to exit the E.U. by passing a bill that gives the prime minister of the U.K. the authority to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. Thisreferendum has created political and economic uncertainty, particularly in the U.K. and the E.U., and this uncertainty may last for years. There are many waysin which our business could be affected, only some of which we can identify.The referendum, and the likely withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. it triggers, has caused and, along with events that could occur in the future as aconsequence of the U.K.’s withdrawal, including the possible breakup of the U.K., may continue to cause significant volatility in global financial markets,including in global currency and debt markets. This volatility could cause a slowdown in economic activity in the U.K., Europe or globally, which couldadversely affect our operating results and growth prospects. In addition, our business could be negatively affected by new trade agreements between the U.K.and other countries, including the U.S., and by the possible imposition of trade or other regulatory barriers in the U.K., especially if the U.K. withdraws fromthe E.U. These possible negative impacts, and others resulting from the U.K.’s actual or threatened withdrawal from the E.U., may adversely affect ouroperating results and growth prospects as well as the manner in which we conduct our business operations in Europe.U.S. federal income tax reform could adversely affect us.In December 2017, U.S. federal tax legislation, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), was signed into law, significantly reformingthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC). The TCJA, among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposes significantadditional limitations on the deductibility of interest, allows for the expensing of capital expenditures, puts into effect the migration from a “worldwide”system of taxation to a territorial system and modifies or repeals many business deductions and credits.We continue to examine the impact the TCJA may have on our business. The TCJA is a far-reaching and complex revision to the U.S. federal incometax laws with disparate and, in some cases, countervailing impacts on different categories of taxpayers and industries, and will require subsequent rulemakingand interpretation in a number of areas. The long-term impact of the TCJA on the overall economy, the industries in which we operate and our and ourpartners’ business cannot be reliably predicted at this early stage of the new law’s implementation. There can be no assurance that the TCJA will notnegatively impact our operating results, financial condition, and future business operations. The estimated impact of the TCJA is based on our management’scurrent knowledge and assumptions, following consultation with our tax advisors. Because of our valuation allowance in the U.S., ongoing tax effects of theAct are not expected to materially change our effective tax rate in future periods. The impact of the TCJA on holders of common stock is uncertain and couldbe materially adverse. This Annual Report does not discuss any such tax legislation or the manner in which it might affect investors in common stock.Investors should consult with their own tax advisors with respect to such legislation and the potential tax consequences of investing in common stock.New legislation or regulation which could affect our tax burden could be enacted by any governmental authority. We cannot predict the timing orextent of such tax-related developments which could have a negative impact on our financial results. Additionally, we use our best judgment in attempting toquantify and reserve for these tax obligations. However, a challenge by a taxing authority, our ability to utilize tax benefits such as carryforwards or taxcredits, or a deviation from other tax-related assumptions may cause actual financial results to deviate from previous estimates. 34 Table of ContentsFuture transactions may harm our business or the market price of our stock.We regularly review potential transactions related to technologies, products or product rights and businesses complementary to our business. Thesetransactions could include: • mergers; • acquisitions; • strategic alliances; • licensing agreements; and • co-promotion and similar agreements.We may choose to enter into one or more of these transactions at any time, which may cause substantial fluctuations in the market price of our stock.Moreover, depending upon the nature of any transaction, we may experience a charge to earnings, which could also materially adversely affect our results ofoperations and could harm the market price of our stock.We may undertake strategic acquisitions in the future, and difficulties integrating such acquisitions could damage our ability to achieve or sustainprofitability.Although we have no experience in acquiring businesses, we may acquire businesses or assets that complement or augment our existing business. If weacquire businesses with promising products or technologies, we may not be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to moveone or more products through preclinical and/or clinical development to regulatory approval and commercialization. Integrating any newly acquiredbusinesses or technologies could be expensive and time-consuming, resulting in the diversion of resources from our current business. We may not be able tointegrate any acquired business successfully. We cannot assure you that, following an acquisition, we will achieve revenues, specific net income or losslevels that justify the acquisition or that the acquisition will result in increased earnings, or reduced losses, for the combined company in any future period.Moreover, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing to acquire any businesses, which would result in dilutionfor stockholders or the incurrence of indebtedness and may not be available on terms which would otherwise be acceptable to us. We may not be able tooperate acquired businesses profitably or otherwise implement our growth strategy successfully.Our operating results may fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors which make our future results difficult to predict and could cause ouroperating results to fall below expectations or our guidance.Our operating results will continue to be subject to fluctuations. The revenues we generate and our operating results will be affected by numerousfactors, including: • product sales; • cost of product sales; • marketing and other expenses; • manufacturing or supply issues; • the timing and amount of royalties or milestone payments; • our addition or termination of development programs; • variations in the level of expenses related to our products or future development programs; • regulatory developments affecting our products or those of our competitors; our execution of collaborative, licensing or other arrangements, andthe timing of payments we may make or receive under these arrangements; • any intellectual property infringement or other lawsuit in which we may become involved; and • the timing and recognition of stock-based compensation expense.If our operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts or below any guidance we may provide, the price of our commonstock could decline substantially. Furthermore, any fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the price of our stock to fluctuate substantially.We believe that comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance. 35 Table of ContentsWe are increasingly dependent on information technology systems, infrastructure and data. Cybersecurity breaches could expose us to liability, damageour reputation, compromise our confidential information or otherwise adversely affect our business.We are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems, infrastructure and data. Our computer systems may be vulnerable to serviceinterruption or destruction, malicious intrusion and random attack. Security breaches pose a risk that sensitive data, including intellectual property, tradesecrets or personal information may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. Cyber-attacks are increasing in their frequency, sophistication andintensity, and have become increasingly difficult to detect. Cyber-attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, denial-of service, socialengineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten data confidentiality, integrity and availability. Our key business partners face similarrisks, and a security breach of their systems could adversely affect our security posture. While we continue to invest in data protection and informationtechnology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent service interruptions, or identify breaches in our systems, that could adversely affect ourbusiness and operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive information, which could result in financial, legal, business or reputational harm.Risks related to intellectual property and other legal mattersOur rights to develop and commercialize our products are subject in part to the terms and conditions of licenses or sublicenses granted to us by otherpharmaceutical companies.Our rights to our product portfolio are based in part on patents and other intellectual property licensed from third-parties. These third parties maygenerally terminate the license agreements under certain circumstances, including a material breach of the agreement by the other. In the event we terminateour license, or if the third-party terminates our license due to our breach, rights to the intellectual property revert back to the licensor. Any termination orreversion of our rights to develop or commercialize our products would have a material adverse effect on our business.If our efforts to protect the proprietary nature of the intellectual property related to our products are not adequate, we may not be able to competeeffectively in our markets.Method of treatment patents protect the use of a product for the method specified in the patent claims. This type of patent does not prevent acompetitor from making and marketing a product that is identical to our product for a use that is outside the scope of the patented method. Moreover, even ifcompetitors do not actively promote their product for our patented methods, physicians may prescribe these products “off-label.” Although off-labelprescriptions may infringe or contribute to the infringement of method of treatment patents, such infringement may be difficult to prevent.Our patents and patent applications may be challenged or fail to result in issued patents and our existing or future patents may be too narrow to preventthird parties from developing or designing around these patents. In addition, we generally rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements toprotect certain proprietary know-how that is not patentable, for processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and for any other elements of our drugdevelopment processes that involve proprietary know-how, information and technology that is not covered by patent applications. While we require all ofour employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information and technology to enter intoconfidentiality agreements, we cannot be certain that this know-how, information and technology will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwisegain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. Further, the laws of some foreign countries donot protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending ourintellectual property both in the U.S. and abroad. If we are unable to protect or defend the intellectual property related to our technologies, we will not beable to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market.We have been, and may continue to be, involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive, time-consuming andunsuccessful, and third parties may challenge the validity or enforceability of our patents and they may be successful.Even where laws provide protection or we are able to obtain patents, costly and time-consuming litigation may be necessary to enforce and determinethe scope of our proprietary rights, and the outcome of such litigation would be uncertain. Moreover, any actions we may bring to enforce our intellectualproperty against our competitors could provoke them to bring counterclaims against us, and some of our competitors have substantially greater intellectualproperty portfolios than we have. To counter infringement or unauthorized use of any patents we may obtain, we may be required to file infringement claims,which can be expensive and time-consuming to litigate. In addition, if we or one of our future collaborators were to initiate legal proceedings against a thirdparty to enforce a patent covering one of our products, current product candidates, or one of our future products, the defendant could counterclaim that thepatent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or 36 Table of Contentsunenforceability are commonplace and challenges to validity of patents in certain foreign jurisdictions are common as well. Grounds for a validity challengecould be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, non-enablement or lack of statutory subjectmatter. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant materialinformation from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or made a materially misleading statement, during prosecution. We may assert the patents in Hatch-Waxman litigation against the party filing the ANDA to keep the competing product off of the market until the patents expire but there is a risk that we willnot succeed. The party filing the ANDA may also counterclaim in the litigation that our patents are not valid or unenforceable, and the court may find one ormore claims of our patents invalid or unenforceable. If this occurs, a competing generic product could be marketed prior to expiration of our patents listed inthe FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly known as the “Orange Book,” which would harm our business.In June 2014, we filed suit against Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (Roxane) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Delaware District Court).The suit seeks an adjudication that Roxane has infringed one or more claims of our U.S. Patent No. 8,586,610 (‘610 Patent) by submitting to the FDA anANDA for a generic version of Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the ‘610 Patent in November 2027. In addition, pursuant to a settlement agreement withNovartis Pharma AG (Novartis), we assumed Novartis’ patent infringement action against Roxane in the Delaware District Court. That suit alleges thatRoxane has infringed one or more claims of U.S. Patent RE39198 (‘198 Patent), which is licensed exclusively to us, by filing an ANDA for a generic versionof Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the ‘198 Patent in November 2016. These two cases against Roxane were consolidated by agreement of the parties andwere tried together in a five-day bench trial that concluded on March 4, 2016. On August 25, 2016, the Delaware District Court ruled in our favor, findingthat Roxane’s ANDA product infringed the asserted claims of the ‘610 Patent and the ‘198 Patent. The Delaware District Court ruled that we are entitled to apermanent injunction against Roxane enjoining Roxane from infringing the ‘610 Patent, including the manufacture, use, sale, offer to sell, sale, distributionor importation of any generic iloperidone product described in the ‘610 Patent ANDA until the expiration of the ‘610 Patent in November 2027. If we obtainpediatric exclusivity, the injunction against Roxane would be extended until May 2028 under the Delaware District Court’s order. On September 23, 2016,Roxane filed a notice of appeal with the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit). Roxane filed its opening appellate brief on February 7, 2017. Wefiled our responsive brief on April 19, 2017, and Roxane filed its reply brief on May 3, 2017. On July 27, 2017, Roxane, now a subsidiary of HikmaPharmaceuticals PLC (Hikma), petitioned the Federal Circuit to substitute Roxane with new defendants West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limitedand West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. (each of which is a subsidiary of Hikma and both of which are referred to collectively herein as West-Ward). We didnot oppose the substitution of West-Ward for Roxane. The appeal is fully briefed, and oral argument was held on December 5, 2017. The Federal Circuit hasnot yet issued a decision.In 2015, we filed six separate patent infringement lawsuits in the Delaware District Court against Roxane, Inventia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (Inventia),Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Lupin), Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (Taro), and Apotex Inc. andApotex Corp. (collectively, the Defendants). The lawsuits each seek an adjudication that the respective Defendants infringed one or more claims of the ‘610Patent and/or our U.S. Patent No. 9,138,432 (‘432 Patent) by submitting to the FDA an ANDA for a generic version of Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the‘610 Patent in November 2027 or the ‘432 Patent in September 2025. The Defendants have denied infringement and counterclaimed for declaratory judgmentof invalidity and noninfringement of the ‘610 Patent and the ‘432 Patent. Certain Defendants have since entered into agreements resolving these lawsuits, asdiscussed below. The remaining parties have agreed, and the Delaware District Court has ordered, that within 14 days after any decision on the merits in theRoxane appeal, the parties will submit to the Delaware District Court a status report and request a schedule for trial. We entered into a confidential stipulationwith Inventia regarding any potential launch of Inventia’s generic ANDA product. We also entered into a confidential stipulation with Lupin regarding anypotential launch of Lupin’s generic ANDA product.Lupin filed counter-claims for declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of seven of our method of treatment patents that are listed in theOrange Book related to Fanapt® (such seven patents, the Method of Treatment Patents). We have not sued Lupin for infringing the Method of TreatmentPatents. On October 13, 2016, we, along with Lupin, filed a Stipulation of Dismissal in the Delaware District Court pursuant to which Lupin’s counterclaimsrelating to the Method of Treatment Patents were dismissed without prejudice in recognition of an agreement reached between Lupin and us by which wewould not assert those patents against Lupin absent certain changes in Lupin’s proposed prescribing information for its iloperidone tablets.On October 24, 2016, we entered into a License Agreement with Taro to resolve our patent litigation against Taro regarding Taro’s ANDA seekingapproval of its generic version of Fanapt® (Taro License Agreement). Under the Taro License Agreement, we granted Taro a non-exclusive license tomanufacture and commercialize Taro’s version of Fanapt® in the U.S. effective November 2, 2027, unless prior to that date we obtain pediatric exclusivity forFanapt®, in which case, the license will be effective May 2, 2028. Taro may enter the market earlier under certain limited circumstances. The Taro LicenseAgreement, which is subject to review by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), provides for a full settlementand release by us and Taro of all claims that are the subject of the litigation. 37 Table of ContentsOn December 7, 2016, we entered into a License Agreement with Apotex to resolve our patent litigation against Apotex regarding Apotex’s ANDAseeking approval of its generic version of Fanapt® (Apotex License Agreement). Under the Apotex License Agreement, we granted Apotex a non-exclusivelicense to manufacture and commercialize Apotex’s version of Fanapt® in the U.S. effective November 2, 2027, unless prior to that date we obtain pediatricexclusivity for Fanapt®, in which case, the license will be effective May 2, 2028. Apotex may enter the market earlier under certain limited circumstances.The Apotex License Agreement, which is subject to review by the FTC and the DOJ, provides for a full settlement and release by us and Apotex of all claimsthat are the subject of the litigation.On February 26, 2016, Roxane filed suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Ohio District Court). The suit sought adeclaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of the Method of Treatment Patents. We have not sued Roxane for infringing the Method ofTreatment Patents. We filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction or to transfer the lawsuit to the Delaware District Court. OnDecember 20, 2016, the Ohio District Court ruled in our favor, dismissing Roxane’s suit without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction.On February 26, 2016, Roxane filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) of the ‘432 Patent with the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB) of theU.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We filed a Preliminary Response on June 7, 2016, and on August 30, 2016, the PTAB denied the request by Roxane toinstitute an IPR of the ‘432 Patent. On September 29, 2016, Roxane filed a Petition for Rehearing with the PTAB, and on October 13, 2016, we filed aResponse to Roxane’s Petition. On November 4, 2016, the PTAB denied Roxane’s Petition for Rehearing.If we do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Act and similar foreign legislation to extend our patents and to obtain market exclusivity forour products, our business will be harmed.The Hatch-Waxman Act provides for an extension of patent term for drugs for a period of up to five years to compensate for time spent in development.Assuming we gain a five-year patent term extension for HETLIOZ®, and that we continue to have rights under our license agreement with respect to thisproduct, we would have exclusive rights to the HETLIOZ® U.S. new chemical entity patent (the primary patent covering the product as a new composition ofmatter) until 2022. We also own HETLIOZ® U.S. method of treatment patents (directed to the approved method of treatment as described in the HETLIOZ®label approved by the FDA), which expire normally in 2033 and 2034. The Fanapt® U.S. new chemical entity patent received the full five-year patent termextension under the Hatch-Waxman Act and so this patent in the U.S. expired in November 2016. In November 2013, a patent directed to a method of treatingpatients with Fanapt® based on genotype was issued to us by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. This patent, which was listed in the Orange Book inJanuary 2015, is set to expire in 2027. Please see the risk factor entitled “We have been, and may be, involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents,which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful, and third parties may challenge the validity or enforceability of our patents and they may besuccessful,” and Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, of this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information. See also Note 16, Legal Matters, to theconsolidated financial statements included in Part II of this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information. Eight additional U.S. patents directed tomethods of treating patients with Fanapt®, which are set to expire between 2025 and 2031, were issued to us in 2015.A directive in the E.U. provides that companies that receive regulatory approval for a new medicinal product will have a 10-year period of marketexclusivity for that product (with the possibility of a further one-year extension), beginning on the date of such European regulatory approval, regardless ofwhen the European new chemical entity patent covering such product expires. A generic version of the approved drug may not be marketed or sold in Europeduring such market exclusivity period. This directive is of material importance with respect to Fanapt®, since the European new chemical entity patent forFanapt® has expired.Assuming we gain a five-year patent term restoration for tradipitant, and that we continue to have rights under our license agreement with respect tothis product, we would have exclusive rights to tradipitant’ s U.S. new chemical entity patent until 2029. Assuming we gain a five-year patent termrestoration for VQW-765, and that we continue to have rights under our license agreement with respect to this product, we would have exclusive rights toVQW-765’s U.S. new chemical entity patent until 2028.However, there is no assurance that we will receive the extensions of our patents or other exclusive rights available under the Hatch-Waxman Act orsimilar foreign legislation. If we fail to receive such extensions or exclusive rights, our or our partners’ ability to prevent competitors from manufacturing,marketing and selling generic versions of our products will be materially impaired.Litigation or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement could require us to divert resources and may prevent or delay our drug discoveryand development efforts.Our commercial success depends in part on our not infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties may assert that we areemploying their proprietary technology without authorization. In addition, third parties may obtain patents in the future and claim that use of ourtechnologies infringes upon these patents. 38 Table of ContentsFurthermore, parties making claims against us may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to develop andcommercialize one or more of our products. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would divert substantial financial and employee resources fromour business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, obtain one or more licenses from thirdparties or pay royalties. In addition, even in the absence of litigation, we may need to obtain additional licenses from third parties to advance our research orallow commercialization of our products. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a reasonable cost or on reasonable terms, if at all. In that event, wewould be unable to develop and commercialize further one or more of our products.In addition, in the future we could be required to initiate litigation to enforce our proprietary rights against infringement by third parties. Prosecutionof these claims to enforce our rights against others could divert substantial financial and employee resources from our business. If we fail to enforce ourproprietary rights against others, our business will be harmed.As described elsewhere in these risk factors and in Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, of this annual report on Form 10-K, we have initiated lawsuits toenforce our patent rights against certain generic pharmaceutical companies.Risks related to our common stockOur stock price has been highly volatile and may be volatile in the future, and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.The realization of any of the risks described in these risk factors or other unforeseen risks could have a dramatic and adverse effect on the market priceof our common stock. Between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017, the high and low sale prices of our common stock as reported on The Nasdaq GlobalMarket varied between $11.90 and $18.99. Additionally, market prices for securities of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including ours, havehistorically been very volatile. The market for these securities has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations for reasons thatwere unrelated to the operating performance of any one company.The following factors, in addition to the other risk factors described in this section, may also have a significant impact on the market price of ourcommon stock: • our or our partners’ level of success in commercializing our products; • our level of success in executing our commercialization strategies; • publicity regarding actual or potential testing or trial results relating to products under development by us or our competitors; • the outcome of regulatory review relating to products under development by us or our competitors; • regulatory developments in the U.S. and foreign countries; • developments concerning any collaboration or other strategic transaction we may undertake; • publicity regarding actual or potential litigation involving us; • announcements of patent issuances or denials, technological innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors; • termination or delay of development or commercialization program(s) by our partners; • safety issues with our products or those of our competitors; • announcements of technological innovations or new therapeutic products or methods by us or others; • actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results; • changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations by securities analysts or failure to meet such financial expectations; • changes in government regulations or policies; • changes in patent legislation or patent decisions or adverse changes to patent law; • additions or departures of key personnel or members of our board of directors; • the publication of negative research or articles about our company, our business or our products by industry analysts or others; • market rumors or press reports; 39 Table of Contents • publicity regarding actual or potential transactions involving us; and • economic, political and other external factors beyond our control.We have been and may in the future be subject to litigation, which could harm our stock price, business, results of operations and financial condition.We have been the subject of litigation in the past and may be subject to litigation in the future. In the past, following periods of volatility in the marketprice of their stock, many companies, including us, have been the subjects of securities class action litigation. Any such litigation can result in substantialcosts and diversion of management’s attention and resources and could harm our stock price, business results of operations and financial condition. As aresult of these factors, holders of our common stock might be unable to sell their shares at or above the price they paid for such shares.If there are substantial sales of our common stock, our stock price could decline.A small number of institutional investors and private equity funds hold a significant number of shares of our common stock. Sales by thesestockholders of a substantial number of shares, or the expectation of such sales, could cause a significant reduction in the market price of our common stock.In addition to our outstanding common stock, as of December 31, 2017 there were a total of 6,077,622 shares of our common stock that we haveregistered and that we are obligated to issue upon the exercise of currently outstanding options and settlement of restricted stock unit awards granted underour 2006 and 2016 Equity Incentive Plans. Upon the exercise of these options or settlement of the shares underlying these restricted stock units, as the casemay be, in accordance with their respective terms, these shares may be resold freely, subject to restrictions imposed on our affiliates under Rule 144. Ifsignificant sales of these shares occur in short periods of time, these sales could reduce the market price of our common stock. Any reduction in the tradingprice of our common stock could impede our ability to raise capital on attractive terms, if at all.If we fail to maintain the requirements for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market, our common stock could be delisted from trading, whichwould adversely affect the liquidity of our common stock and our ability to raise additional capital.Our common stock is currently listed for quotation on The Nasdaq Global Market. We are required to meet specified listing criteria in order to maintainour listing on The Nasdaq Global Market. If we fail to satisfy The Nasdaq Global Market’s continued listing requirements, our common stock could bedelisted from The Nasdaq Global Market, in which case we may transfer to The Nasdaq Capital Market, which generally has lower financial requirements forinitial listing or, if we fail to meet its listing requirements, the over-the-counter bulletin board. Any potential delisting of our common stock from The NasdaqGlobal Market would make it more difficult for our stockholders to sell our stock in the public market and would likely result in decreased liquidity andincreased volatility for our common stock.If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports or publish unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and tradingvolume could decline.The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or ourbusiness. We currently have research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock, ourstock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our Company or fails to regularly publish reports on us, interest in thepurchase of our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings.In order to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into orexchangeable for our common stock at prices that may not be the same as the price per share in previous offerings. We may sell shares or other securities inany other offering at a price per share that is less than the price per share paid by investors in previous offerings, and investors purchasing shares or othersecurities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders. The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock, orsecurities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share paid by investors. 40 Table of ContentsOur business could be negatively affected as a result of the actions of activist stockholders.Proxy contests have been waged against many companies in the biopharmaceutical industry, including us, over the last several years. If faced with aproxy contest or other type of shareholder activism, we may not be able to respond successfully to the contest or dispute, which would be disruptive to ourbusiness. Even if we are successful, our business could be adversely affected by a proxy contest or shareholder dispute involving us or our partners because: • responding to proxy contests and other actions by activist stockholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupting operations and divertingthe attention of management and employees; • perceived uncertainties as to future direction may result in the loss of potential acquisitions, collaborations or in-licensing opportunities, andmay make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners; and • if individuals are elected to a board of directors with a specific agenda, it may adversely affect our ability to effectively and timely implementour strategic plan and create additional value for our stockholders.These actions could cause our stock price to experience periods of volatility.Anti-takeover provisions in our charter and bylaws and under Delaware law, and our rights plan could prevent or delay a change in control of ourcompany.We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay orprevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after theperson becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our amended and restatedcertificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may considerfavorable. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws: • authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to thwart a takeover attempt; • do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would allow holders of less than a majority of the stock to elect somedirectors; • establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which the successors to the directors whose terms have expired will be elected to serve fromthe time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following their election; • require that directors only be removed from office for cause; • provide that vacancies on the board of directors, including newly-created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors then inoffice; • limit who may call special meetings of stockholders; • prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all actions to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders; and • establish advance notice requirements for nominating candidates for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be actedupon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.Moreover, in September 2008, our board of directors adopted a rights agreement that expires in September 2018, the provisions of which could resultin significant dilution of the proportionate ownership of a potential acquirer and, accordingly, could discourage, delay or prevent a change in ourmanagement or control over us. While no determination has yet been made, our board of directors may choose to adopt a new rights agreement to replace thecurrent one upon or prior to its expiration.Global economic conditions may have an adverse effect on our business.Financial instability or a general decline in economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries where we sell our product could adversely affect ouroperations. Economic conditions, and uncertainty as to the general direction of the macroeconomic environment, are beyond our control and may make anynecessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly, and more dilutive. While we believe we have adequate capital resources to meet currentworking capital and capital expenditure requirements, an economic downturn or significant increase in our expenses could require additional financing onless than attractive rates or on terms that are excessively dilutive to existing stockholders. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner andon favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our stock price and could require us to delay or abandon clinical development plans. 41 Table of ContentsSales of our products will be dependent, in large part, on reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers,distribution partners and other organizations. In the event of economic decline, these organizations may be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligationsor may delay payment. In addition, federal and state health authorities may reduce Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, and private insurers may increasetheir scrutiny of claims. A reduction in the availability or extent of reimbursement could negatively affect our or our partners’ product sales and revenue.In addition, we rely on third parties for several important aspects of our business. For example, we use third parties for sales, distribution, medical affairsand clinical research, and we rely upon several single source providers of raw materials and contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our products.During challenging and uncertain economic times and in tight credit markets, there may be a disruption or delay in the performance of our third partycontractors, suppliers or partners. If such third parties are unable to satisfy their commitments to us, our business and results of operations would be adverselyaffected. ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSNot applicable. ITEM 2.PROPERTIESOur headquarters office consists of a total of 40,188 square feet of office space located at 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. in Washington, D.C. underoperating leases and subleases that expire in 2026 and are subject to renewal options. In addition, we have 2,880 square feet of office space for our Europeanheadquarters in London under an operating lease that has a lease term ending in 2021 and is subject to a renewal option, and 1,249 square feet of office spacein Berlin under a short-term operating lease. We believe that these facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our anticipated near-term needs. We anticipatethat following the expiration of the leases, additional or alternative space will be available at commercially reasonable terms. ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGSIn June 2014, we filed suit against Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (Roxane) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Delaware District Court).The suit seeks an adjudication that Roxane has infringed one or more claims of our U.S. Patent No. 8,586,610 (‘610 Patent) by submitting to the U.S. Foodand Drug Administration (FDA) an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for a generic version of Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the ‘610 Patent inNovember 2027. In addition, pursuant to a settlement agreement with Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis), we assumed Novartis’ patent infringement actionagainst Roxane in the Delaware District Court. That suit alleges that Roxane has infringed one or more claims of U.S. Patent RE39198 ( ‘198 Patent), which islicensed exclusively to us, by filing an ANDA for a generic version of Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the ‘198 Patent in November 2016. These two casesagainst Roxane were consolidated by agreement of the parties and were tried together in a five-day bench trial that concluded on March 4, 2016. OnAugust 25, 2016, the Delaware District Court ruled in our favor, finding that Roxane’s ANDA product infringed the asserted claims of the ‘610 Patent and the‘198 Patent. The Delaware District Court ruled that we are entitled to a permanent injunction against Roxane enjoining Roxane from infringing the ‘610Patent, including the manufacture, use, sale, offer to sell, sale, distribution or importation of any generic iloperidone product described in the ‘610 PatentANDA until the expiration of the ‘610 Patent in November 2027. If we obtain pediatric exclusivity, the injunction against Roxane would be extended untilMay 2028 under the Delaware District Court’s order. On September 23, 2016, Roxane filed a notice of appeal with the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.Roxane filed its opening appellate brief on February 7, 2017. We filed our responsive brief on April 19, 2017, and Roxane filed its reply brief on May 3,2017. On July 27, 2017, Roxane, now a subsidiary of Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC (Hikma), petitioned the Federal Circuit Court to substitute Roxane withnew defendants West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. (each of which is a subsidiary of Hikma and both ofwhich are referred to collectively herein as West-Ward). We did not oppose the substitution of West-Ward for Roxane. The appeal is fully briefed, and oralargument was held on December 5, 2017. The Federal Circuit has not yet issued a decision.In 2015, we filed six separate patent infringement lawsuits in the Delaware District Court against Roxane, Inventia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (Inventia),Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Lupin), Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (Taro), and Apotex Inc. andApotex Corp. (collectively, the Defendants). The lawsuits each seek an adjudication that the respective Defendants infringed one or more claims of the ‘610Patent and/or our U.S. Patent No. 9,138,432 (‘432 Patent) by submitting to the FDA an ANDA for a generic version of Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the‘610 Patent in November 2027 or the ‘432 Patent in September 2025. The Defendants have denied infringement and counterclaimed for declaratory judgmentof invalidity and noninfringement of the ‘610 Patent and the ‘432 Patent. Certain Defendants have since entered into agreements resolving these lawsuits, asdiscussed below. The remaining parties have agreed, and the Delaware District Court has ordered, that within 14 days after any decision on the merits in theRoxane appeal, the parties will submit to the Delaware District Court a status report and request a schedule for trial. We entered into a confidential stipulationwith Inventia regarding any potential launch of Inventia’s generic ANDA product. We also entered into a confidential stipulation with Lupin regarding anypotential launch of Lupin’s generic ANDA product. 42 Table of ContentsLupin filed counter claims for declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of seven of our method of treatment patents that are listed in theApproved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book) related to Fanapt® (such seven patents, the Method of TreatmentPatents). We have not sued Lupin for infringing the Method of Treatment Patents. On October 13, 2016, we, along with Lupin, filed a Stipulation of Dismissalin the Delaware District Court pursuant to which Lupin’s counterclaims relating to the Method of Treatment Patents were dismissed without prejudice inrecognition of an agreement reached between Lupin and us by which we would not assert those patents against Lupin absent certain changes in Lupin’sproposed prescribing information for its iloperidone tablets.On October 24, 2016, we entered into a License Agreement with Taro to resolve our patent litigation against Taro regarding Taro’s ANDA seekingapproval of its generic version of Fanapt® (Taro License Agreement). Under the Taro License Agreement, we granted Taro a non-exclusive license tomanufacture and commercialize Taro’s version of Fanapt® in the U.S. effective November 2, 2027, unless prior to that date we obtain pediatric exclusivity forFanapt®, in which case, the license will be effective May 2, 2028. Taro may enter the market earlier under certain limited circumstances. The Taro LicenseAgreement, which is subject to review by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), provides for a full settlementand release by us and Taro of all claims that are the subject of the litigation.On December 7, 2016, we entered into a License Agreement with Apotex to resolve our patent litigation against Apotex regarding Apotex’s ANDAseeking approval of its generic version of Fanapt® (Apotex License Agreement). Under the Apotex License Agreement, we granted Apotex a non-exclusivelicense to manufacture and commercialize Apotex’s version of Fanapt® in the U.S. effective November 2, 2027, unless prior to that date we obtain pediatricexclusivity for Fanapt®, in which case, the license will be effective May 2, 2028. Apotex may enter the market earlier under certain limited circumstances.The Apotex License Agreement, which is subject to review by the FTC and the DOJ, provides for a full settlement and release by us and Apotex of all claimsthat are the subject of the litigation.On February 26, 2016, Roxane filed suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Ohio District Court). The suit sought adeclaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of the Method of Treatment Patents. We have not sued Roxane for infringing the Method ofTreatment Patents. We filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction or to transfer the lawsuit to the Delaware District Court. OnDecember 20, 2016, the Ohio District Court ruled in our favor, dismissing Roxane’s suit without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction.On February 26, 2016, Roxane filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) of the ‘432 Patent with the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB) of theU.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We filed a Preliminary Response on June 7, 2016, and on August 30, 2016, the PTAB denied the request by Roxane toinstitute an IPR of the ‘432 Patent. On September 29, 2016, Roxane filed a Petition for Rehearing with the PTAB, and on October 13, 2016, we filed aResponse to Roxane’s Petition. On November 4, 2016, the PTAB denied Roxane’s Petition for Rehearing. ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESNot applicable. 43 Table of ContentsPART II ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OFEQUITY SECURITIESOur common stock is quoted on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “VNDA.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, therange of high and low sale prices of our common stock as reported on The Nasdaq Global Market: Year Ended December 31, 2017 High Low First quarter $16.30 $12.70 Second quarter 16.65 13.20 Third quarter 18.99 15.01 Fourth quarter 18.25 11.90 Year Ended December 31, 2016 High Low First quarter $9.58 $6.91 Second quarter 11.4 8.02 Third quarter 18.00 10.81 Fourth quarter 17.65 13.55 As of February 1, 2018, there were 7 holders of record of our common stock. The number of holders of record of our common stock does not reflect thenumber of beneficial holders whose shares are held by depositors, brokers or other nominees.DividendsWe have not paid dividends to our stockholders (other than a dividend of preferred share purchase rights which was declared in September 2008) sinceour inception and do not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain earnings, if any, to finance our growth.Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder MattersThe following graph shows the cumulative five-year total return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the Nasdaq CompositeIndex and the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock andin each of the indexes on December 31, 2012 and its relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2017. The comparisons in the table are requiredby the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock. Wehave not paid dividends to our stockholders since the inception (other than a dividend of preferred share purchase rights which was declared in September2008) and do not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. The following graph and related information is being furnished solely to accompany thisannual report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K and shall not be deemed “soliciting materials” or to be “filed” with the SEC (otherthan as provided in Item 201), nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, and irrespective of any general incorporation language in anysuch filing. 44 Table of ContentsSecurities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Incentive PlansInformation regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity incentive plans will be contained in our Proxy Statement for the 2018 AnnualMeeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, under the captions “EquityCompensation Plan Information” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and is incorporated herein by reference pursuantto General Instruction G (3) to Form 10-K. 45 Table of ContentsITEM 6.SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATAThe consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the consolidated balance sheet data as ofDecember 31, 2017 and 2016 are each derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K. Theconsolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31,2015, 2014 and 2013 are each derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included herein. Our historical results for any prior period arenot necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period.The following data should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and the section entitled Management’sDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this annual report on Form 10-K. Year Ended December 31, (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts) 2017 2016 2015 2014 (1) 2013 Statements of Operations Data Total revenues $165,083 $146,017 $109,925 $50,157 $33,879 Operating expenses: Cost of goods sold, excluding amortization 17,848 24,712 23,462 1,583 — Research and development 38,547 29,156 29,145 19,230 28,502 Selling, general and administrative 123,841 99,787 84,531 84,644 25,082 Intangible asset amortization 1,750 10,933 12,972 2,254 1,495 Gain on arbitration settlement — — — (77,616) — Total operating expenses 181,986 164,588 150,110 30,095 55,079 Income (loss) from operations (16,903) (18,571) (40,185) 20,062 (21,200) Other income 1,472 665 320 124 145 Income (loss) before income taxes (15,431) (17,906) (39,865) 20,186 (21,055) Provision for income taxes 136 104 — — — Net income (loss) $(15,567) $(18,010) $(39,865) $20,186 $(21,055) Net income (loss) per share: Basic $(0.35) (0.41) $(0.94) $0.58 $(0.69) Diluted $(0.35) (0.41) $(0.94) $0.55 $(0.69) Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 44,735,146 43,449,441 42,250,254 34,774,163 30,351,353 Diluted 44,735,146 43,449,441 42,250,254 36,686,723 30,351,353 December 31, 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Balance Sheet Data Cash and cash equivalents $33,627 $40,426 $50,843 $60,901 $64,764 Marketable securities 109,786 100,914 92,337 68,921 65,586 Working capital 99,494 123,855 115,230 133,944 102,763 Total assets 205,425 210,374 213,050 171,704 143,349 Total liabilities 74,038 79,044 80,023 10,887 99,225 Accumulated deficit (361,426) (345,859) (327,849) (287,984) (308,170) Total stockholders’ equity 131,387 131,330 133,027 160,817 44,124 (1)Net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes a gain on arbitration settlement of $77.6 million, or $2.23 and $2.12 per basic and dilutedshare, respectively. 46 Table of ContentsITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSYou should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with Selected ConsolidatedFinancial Data and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K. Some of the informationcontained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K include historical information and other informationwith respect to our plans and strategy for our business and contain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Ouractual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited tothose set forth under the “Risk Factors” section of this report and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.OverviewVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (we, our or Vanda) is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization ofinnovative therapies to address high unmet medical needs and improve the lives of patients. We commenced operations in 2003 and our product portfolioincludes: • HETLIOZ® (tasimelteon), a product for the treatment of Non-24-Hour Sleep-Wake Disorder (Non-24), was approved by the U.S. Food and DrugAdministration (FDA) in January 2014 and launched commercially in the U.S. in April 2014. In July 2015, the European Commission (EC)granted centralized marketing authorization with unified labeling for HETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24 in totally blind adults. HETLIOZ®was commercially launched in Germany in August 2016. HETLIOZ® has potential utility in a number of other circadian rhythm disorders and ispresently in clinical development for the treatment of Pediatric Non-24, Jet Lag Disorder and Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS). • Fanapt® (iloperidone), a product for the treatment of schizophrenia, the oral formulation of which was approved by the FDA in May 2009 andlaunched commercially in the U.S. by Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis) in January of 2010. Novartis transferred all the U.S. and Canadiancommercial rights to the Fanapt® franchise to us on December 31, 2014. Additionally, our distribution partners launched Fanapt® in Israel andMexico in 2014. Fanapt® has potential utility in a number of other disorders. An assessment of new Fanapt® clinical opportunities is ongoing. • Tradipitant (VLY-686), a small molecule neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) antagonist, which is presently in clinical development for the treatmentof chronic pruritus in atopic dermatitis and the treatment of gastroparesis. • VTR-297 (formerly Trichostatin A), a small molecule histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. • VQW-765 (formerly AQW-051), a Phase II alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist. • Portfolio of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) activators and inhibitors.Operational HighlightsTradipitant • A tradipitant for atopic dermatitis Phase III clinical study is expected to begin in the first half of 2018. • A tradipitant clinical study for the treatment of gastroparesis is ongoing. Results are expected by the end of 2018.HETLIOZ® • HETLIOZ® studies for the treatment of jet lag disorder (2102 and 3107) have each completed enrollment. Results from the jet lag disorderclinical program are expected in the first quarter of 2018. • Enrollment in a pharmacokinetic study of the HETLIOZ® pediatric liquid formulation was completed in the fourth quarter of 2017. • Enrollment in the SMS clinical study is ongoing. Results are expected by the end of 2018.VTR-297 (histone deactetylase (HDAC) inhibitor) • A VTR-297 Phase I study (1101) in patients with hematologic malignancies is expected to start in the second half of 2018.Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities (Cash) were $143.4 million as of December 31, 2017, representing an increase to Cash of $2.1 millionduring 2017.Since we began operations in March 2003, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to the in-licensing, clinical development andcommercialization of our products. Our ability to generate meaningful product sales and achieve profitability largely depends on our level of success incommercializing HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® in the U.S. and Europe, on our ability, alone or with others, to complete the development of our products, and toobtain the regulatory approvals for and to manufacture, market and sell our products. The results of our operations will vary significantly from year-to-yearand quarter-to-quarter and depend on a number of factors, including risks related to our business, risks related to our industry, and other risks which aredetailed in Risk Factors reported in Item 1A of Part I of this annual report on Form 10-K.As described in Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, of this annual report on Form 10-K, we have initiated lawsuits to enforce our patent rights againstcertain generic pharmaceutical companies.Critical Accounting PoliciesThe preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets andliabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses duringthe reported periods. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, theresults of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other sources. Actual resultsmay differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. 47 Table of ContentsA summary of our significant accounting policies appears in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year endedDecember 31, 2017 included in this annual report on Form 10-K. However, we believe that the following accounting policies are important to understandingand evaluating our reported financial results, and we have accordingly included them in this discussion.Inventory. Inventory, which is recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value, includes the cost of third-party manufacturing and other direct andindirect costs and is valued using the first-in, first-out method. We capitalize inventory costs associated with our products upon regulatory approval when,based on management’s judgment, future commercialization is considered probable and the future economic benefit is expected to be realized; otherwise,such costs are expensed as research and development. Inventory not expected to be sold within 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified asnon-current.Net Product Sales. Our net product sales consist of sales of HETLIOZ® and sales of Fanapt®. We apply the revenue recognition guidance in accordancewith Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 605-15, Revenue Recognition—Products. We recognizerevenue from product sales when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, title to product and associated risk of loss has passed to thecustomer, the price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and we have no further performance obligations.HETLIOZ® is available in the U.S. for distribution through a limited number of specialty pharmacies, and is not available in retail pharmacies. Fanapt® isavailable in the U.S. for distribution through a limited number of wholesalers and is available in retail pharmacies. We invoice and record revenue when ourcustomers, specialty pharmacies and wholesalers, receive product from the third-party logistics warehouse. Revenues and accounts receivable areconcentrated with these customers. Outside the U.S., we commercially launched HETLIOZ® in Germany in August 2016. We have also entered into adistribution agreement with Megapharm Ltd. for the commercialization of Fanapt® in Israel.Product Sales Discounts and Allowances. Product sales are recorded net of applicable discounts, rebates, chargebacks, service fees, co-pay assistanceand product returns estimates that are applicable for various government and commercial payors. Reserves established for discounts and returns are classifiedas reductions of accounts receivable if the amount is payable to direct customers, with the exception of service fees. Service fees are classified as a liability.Reserves established for rebates, chargebacks or co-pay assistance are classified as a liability if the amount is payable to a party other than customers. Wecurrently record sales allowances for the following:Prompt-pay: Specialty pharmacies and wholesalers are offered discounts for prompt payment. We expect that the specialty pharmacies and wholesalerswill earn prompt payment discounts and, therefore, deduct the full amount of these discounts from total product sales when revenues are recognized.Rebates: Allowances for rebates include mandated and supplemental discounts under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program as well as contracted rebateprograms with other payors. Rebate amounts owed after the final dispensing of the product to a benefit plan participant are based upon contractualagreements or legal requirements with public sector benefit providers, such as Medicaid. The allowance for rebates is based on statutory or contracteddiscount rates and expected utilization. Estimates for the expected utilization of rebates are based on historical activity and, where available, actualand pending prescriptions for which we have validated the insurance benefits. Rebates are generally invoiced and paid in arrears, such that the accrualbalance consists of an estimate of the amount expected to be incurred for the current quarter’s activity, plus an accrual balance for known priorquarter’s unpaid rebates. If actual future invoicing varies from estimates, we may need to adjust accruals, which would affect net revenue in the periodof adjustment.Chargebacks: Chargebacks are discounts that occur when contracted indirect customers purchase directly from specialty pharmacies and wholesalers.Contracted indirect customers, which currently consist primarily of Public Health Service institutions, non-profit clinics, and Federal governmententities purchasing via the Federal Supply Schedule, generally purchase the product at a discounted price. The specialty pharmacy or wholesaler, inturn, charges back the difference between the price initially paid by the specialty pharmacy or wholesaler and the discounted price paid to the specialtypharmacy or wholesaler by the contracted customer. The allowance for chargebacks is based on historical activity and, where available, actual andpending prescriptions for which we have validated the insurance benefits.Medicare Part D Coverage Gap: Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit mandates manufacturers to fund approximately 50% of the Medicare Part Dinsurance coverage gap for prescription drugs sold to eligible patients. We account for the Medicare Part D coverage gap using a point of sale model.Estimates for expected Medicare Part D coverage gap are based in part on historical activity and, where available, actual and pending prescriptions forwhich we have validated the insurance benefits. Funding of the coverage gap is generally invoiced and paid in arrears so that the accrual balanceconsists of an estimate of the amount expected to be incurred for the current quarter’s activity, plus an accrual balance for known prior quarter activity.If actual future funding varies from estimates, we may need to adjust accruals, which would affect net sales in the period of adjustment. 48 Table of ContentsService Fees: We incur specialty pharmacy fees and wholesaler fees for services and their data. These fees are based on contracted terms and are knownamounts. We accrue service fees at the time of revenue recognition, resulting in a reduction of product sales and the recognition of an accrued liability,unless it receives an identifiable and separate benefit for the consideration and it can reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received. Inwhich case, service fees are recorded as selling, general and administrative expense.Co-payment Assistance: Patients who have commercial insurance and meet certain eligibility requirements may receive co-payment assistance. Co-payassistance utilization is based on information provided by our third-party administrator. The allowance for co-pay assistance is based on actual salesand an estimate for pending sales based on either historical activity or pending sales for which we have validated the insurance benefits.Product Returns: Consistent with industry practice, we generally offer direct customers a limited right to return as defined within our returns policy.We consider several factors in the estimation process, including historical return activity, expiration dates of product shipped to specialty pharmacies,inventory levels within the distribution channel, product shelf life, prescription trends and other relevant factors.The following table summarizes sales discounts and allowance activity as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: Discounts, Rebates & Returnsand Other (in thousands) Chargebacks Total Balance at December 31, 2014 $368 $268 $636 Provision related to current period sales 57,424 17,940 75,364 Adjustments for prior period sales (114) (25) (139) Credits/payments made (24,255) (14,626) (38,881) Balance at December 31, 2015 33,423 3,557 36,980 Provision related to current period sales 56,133 19,451 75,584 Adjustments for prior period sales (1,842) 790 (1,052) Credits/payments made (56,512) (17,340) (73,852) Balance at December 31, 2016 31,202 6,458 37,660 Provision related to current period sales 53,406 23,751 77,157 Adjustments for prior period sales (3,883) 1,362 (2,521) Credits/payments made (60,496) (24,214) (84,710) Balance at December 31, 2017 $20,229 $7,357 $27,586 The provision for rebates and chargebacks of $53.4 million and $56.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, primarilyrepresents Medicaid rebates and contracted rebate programs applicable to sales of Fanapt®. The provision for discounts, returns and other of $23.8 millionand $19.5 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, primarily represents wholesaler distribution fees applicable to sales of Fanapt® and,to a lesser extent, product returns of Fanapt® in the normal course of business, as well as co-pay assistance costs and prompt pay discounts applicable to thesales of both HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®.Stock-based compensation. Compensation costs for all stock-based awards to employees and directors are measured based on the grant date fair valueof those awards and recognized over the period during which the employee or director is required to perform service in exchange for the award. We use theBlack-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the fair value of stock options on the date ofgrant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. Thesevariables include the expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors,risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. Expected volatility rates are based on the historical volatility of our publicly traded common stock and otherfactors. The risk-free interest rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the expected term of the option in effect at the time of thegrant. We have not paid dividends to our stockholders since our inception (other than a dividend of preferred share purchase rights which was declared inSeptember 2008) and do not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statementsof operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant andrevised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. 49 Table of ContentsResearch and development expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of fees for services provided by third parties in connectionwith the clinical trials, costs of contract manufacturing services for clinical trial use, milestone payments made under licensing agreements prior to regulatoryapproval, costs of materials used in clinical trials and research and development, costs for regulatory consultants and filings, depreciation of capital resourcesused to develop products, related facilities costs, and salaries, other employee-related costs and stock-based compensation for research and developmentpersonnel. We expense research and development costs as they are incurred for products in the development stage, including manufacturing costs andmilestone payments made under license agreements prior to FDA approval. Upon and subsequent to FDA approval, manufacturing and milestone paymentsmade under license agreements are capitalized. Milestone payments are accrued when it is deemed probable that the milestone event will be achieved. Costsrelated to the acquisition of intellectual property are expensed as incurred if the underlying technology is developed in connection with our research anddevelopment efforts and has no alternative future use.Clinical trials are inherently complex, often involve multiple service providers, and can include payments made to investigator physicians at studysites. Because billing for services often lags delivery of service by a substantial amount of time, we often are required to estimate a significant portion of ouraccrued clinical expenses. Our assessments include, but are not limited to: (i) an evaluation by the project manager of the work that has been completedduring the period, (ii) measurement of progress prepared internally and/or provided by the third-party service provider, (iii) analyses of data that justify theprogress, and (iv) management’s judgment. In the event that we do not identify certain costs that have begun to be incurred or we under- or over-estimates thelevel of services performed or the costs of such services, our reported expenses for such period would be too low or too high.Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, other related costs forpersonnel, including stock-based compensation, related to executive, finance, accounting, information technology, marketing, medical affairs and humanresource functions. Other costs include facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses and fees for marketing, medical affairs,legal, accounting and other professional services. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include third party expenses incurred to support sales,business development, and other business activities. Additionally, selling, general and administrative expenses included our estimate for the annual PatientProtection and Affordable Care fee.Intangible Assets. Our intangible assets consist of capitalized license costs for products approved by the FDA. We amortize our intangible assets on astraight-line basis over estimated useful economic life of the related product patents. We assess the impairment of intangible assets whenever events orchanges in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment reviewinclude significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, a significant adverse change in legal or regulatoryfactors that could affect the value or patent life including our ability to defend and enforce patent claims and other intellectual property rights and significantnegative industry or economic trends. When we determine that the carrying value of our intangible assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence ofone or more of the indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on the amount that carrying value exceeds fair value. No impairments havebeen recognized on our intangible assets.Income taxes. On a periodic basis, we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets and liabilities and will adjust such amounts in light ofchanging facts and circumstances, including but not limited to future projections of taxable income, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax legislation,rulings by relevant tax authorities and tax planning strategies. Settlement of filing positions that may be challenged by tax authorities could impact ourincome taxes in the year of resolution.In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets willnot be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the period in which thosetemporary differences becomes deductible or the net operating losses (NOLs) and credit carryforwards can be utilized. When considering the reversal of thevaluation allowance, we consider the level of past and future taxable income, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, the utilization of the carryforwards andother factors. Revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly fromperiod to period.Recent Accounting PronouncementsSee Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II of this annual report on Form 10-Kfor information on recent accounting pronouncements. 50 Table of ContentsResults of OperationsWe anticipate that our results of operations will fluctuate for the foreseeable future due to several factors, including our and our partners’ ability tosuccessfully commercialize our products, any possible payments made or received pursuant to license or collaboration agreements, progress of our researchand development efforts, the timing and outcome of clinical trials and related possible regulatory approvals. Since our inception, we have incurredsignificant losses resulting in an accumulated deficit of $361.4 million as of December 31, 2017. Our total stockholders’ equity was $131.4 million as ofDecember 31, 2017.Year ended December 31, 2017 compared to year ended December 31, 2016Revenues. Total revenues increased by $19.1 million, or 13%, to $165.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $146.0 million forthe year ended December 31, 2016. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, revenues consisted of the following: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Net Change Percent HETLIOZ® product sales, net $89,978 $71,671 $18,307 26% Fanapt® product sales, net 75,105 74,346 759 1% $165,083 $146,017 $19,066 13% HETLIOZ® product sales increased by $18.3 million, or 26%, to $90.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $71.7 million for theyear ended December 31, 2016. The increase to net product sales was attributable to an increase in volume and, to a lesser extent, an increase to price net ofdeductions.Fanapt® product sales increased by $0.8 million, or 1%, to $75.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $74.3 million for the yearended December 31, 2016. The increase to net product sales was attributable to an increase in price net of deductions and partially offset by a decrease involume.Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold was $17.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $24.7 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2016. Cost of goods sold includes third party manufacturing costs of product sold, third party royalty costs and distribution and other costs.Third party royalty costs are 10% of net sales of HETLIOZ®. Third party royalty costs were 23% of net U.S. sales of Fanapt® through November 15, 2016 and9% thereafter. The decrease was primarily the result of the change in the royalty rate on Fanapt® sales partially offset by an increase in HETLIOZ® third partyroyalty costs due to increase in revenue.In addition to third party royalty costs, HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue depends upon our cost to manufactureinventory at normalized production levels with our third party manufacturers. We expect that, in the future, total HETLIOZ® manufacturing costs included incost of goods sold will continue to be less than 2% of our net HETLIOZ® product sales. We expect that, in the future, total U.S. Fanapt® manufacturing costsincluded in cost of goods sold will continue to be less than 4% of our net U.S. Fanapt® product sales.Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $38.5 million and $29.2 million for the years ended December 31,2017 and 2016, respectively. Expenses for tradipitant for the year ended December 31, 2017 include an accrued expense of $2.0 million for a milestoneobligation that is payable to Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) upon enrollment of the first subject into a Phase III study for tradipitant. The likelihood ofachieving this milestone was determined to be probable during 2017. As a result, the future obligation of $2.0 million tied to such milestone was recorded asresearch and development expense. Clinical trial expenses associated with the HETLIOZ® Jet Lag Disorder program and the tradipitant gastroparesis programincreased for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017,expenses include a $1.0 million initial license fee to develop and commercialize a portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitors. These increases were partiallyoffset by a decrease in indirect project costs reflecting lower stock-based compensation expense. The following table summarizes the costs of our productdevelopment initiatives for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. 51 Table of Contents Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Direct project costs (1) HETLIOZ® $16,894 $12,658 Fanapt® 2,179 2,598 Tradipitant 11,645 7,010 VTR-297 1,978 2,218 CFTR 1,949 — Other 425 — 35,070 24,484 Indirect project costs (1) Stock-based compensation 1,152 2,087 Other indirect overhead 2,325 2,585 3,477 4,672 Total research & development expense $38,547 $29,156 (1)We record direct costs, including personnel costs and related benefits, on a project-by-project basis. Many of our research and development costs arenot attributable to any individual project because we share resources across several development projects. We record indirect costs that support anumber of our research and development activities in the aggregate, including stock-based compensation expense.We expect to incur significant research and development expenses as we continue to develop our products. In addition, we expect to incur licensingcosts in the future that could be substantial, as we continue our efforts to expand our product pipeline.Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $24.0 million, or 24%, to $123.8 million forthe year ended December 31, 2017 compared with $99.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily the result of the Fanapt®sales force expansion, marketing efforts around Fanapt® in the U.S. and HETLIOZ® in the U.S. and Europe and, to a lesser extent, an increase in stock-basedcompensation expense, partially offset by a decrease in legal fees associated with ongoing patent litigation.Intangible asset amortization. Intangible asset amortization was $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $10.9 million for theyear ended December 31, 2016. Amortization of intangible assets relating to Fanapt® was completed in November 2016 and had amounted to $9.2 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2016. The useful life estimation for the Fanapt® intangible asset was based on the market participant methodologyprescribed by ASC 805, and therefore does not reflect the impact of additional Fanapt® patents solely owned by us with varying expiration dates, the latest ofwhich is December 2031. We expect that annual amortization of capitalized intangible asset costs relating to HETLIOZ® will amount to approximately$1.6 million in future years until the final expiration of the related product patents in 2034.Provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes was $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.The tax provision for each year is attributable to activities at our foreign subsidiaries and state income taxes. The tax benefit relating to the loss beforeincome taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 in the U.S. was fully offset by a tax valuation allowance resulting from our assessment that it ismore likely than not that our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of futuretaxable income during the period in which NOLs and credit carryforwards can be utilized.The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes our estimate of the effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The adjustmentthat was recorded results in no tax expense as it is fully offset by a change in our valuation allowance. Because of our valuation allowance in the U.S.,ongoing tax effects of the TCJA are not expected to materially change our effective tax rate in future periods. 52 Table of ContentsYear ended December 31, 2016 compared to year ended December 31, 2015Revenues. Total revenues increased by $36.1 million, or 33%, to $146.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $109.9 million forthe year ended December 31, 2015. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, revenues consisted of the following: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2016 2015 Net Change Percent HETLIOZ® product sales, net $71,671 $44,302 $27,369 62% Fanapt® product sales, net 74,346 65,623 8,723 13% $146,017 $109,925 $36,092 33% HETLIOZ® product sales increased by $27.4 million, or 62%, to $71.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $44.3 million for theyear ended December 31, 2015. The increase to net product sales was attributable to an increase in volume and an increase to price net of deductions.Fanapt® product sales increased by $8.7 million, or 13%, to $74.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $65.6 million for theyear ended December 31, 2015. The increase to net product sales was attributable to an increase in price net of deductions and partially offset by a decrease involume.Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold was $24.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $23.5 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2015. Cost of goods sold includes third party manufacturing costs of product sold, third party royalty costs and distribution and other costs.Third party royalty costs are 10% of net U.S. sales of HETLIOZ®. Third party royalty costs were 23% of net U.S. sales of Fanapt® through November 15, 2016and 9% thereafter.Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $29.2 and $29.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and2015, respectively. Increased clinical trial expenses associated with the HETLIOZ® Jet Lag Disorder and SMS programs and the tradipitant chronic pruritusin atopic dermatitis program that were incurred for the year ended December 31, 2016 were offset by the close out of Fanapt® clinical trial expensestransitioned to us as part of a settlement agreement with Novartis and regulatory expenses related to our supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) filingincurred during the year ended December 31, 2015. The following table summarizes the costs of our product development initiatives for the year endedDecember 31, 2016 and 2015. Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2016 2015 Direct project costs (1) HETLIOZ® $12,658 $10,444 Fanapt® 2,598 8,501 Tradipitant 7,010 4,006 VTR-297 2,218 1,681 24,484 24,632 Indirect project costs (1) Stock-based compensation 2,087 2,269 Other indirect overhead 2,585 2,244 4,672 4,513 Total research & development expense $29,156 $29,145 (1)We record direct costs, including personnel costs and related benefits, on a project-by-project basis. Many of our research and development costs arenot attributable to any individual project because we share resources across several development projects. We record indirect costs that support anumber of our research and development activities in the aggregate, including stock-based compensation expense.Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $15.3 million, or 18%, to $99.8 million for theyear ended December 31, 2016, compared with $84.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily the result of marketing andsales efforts around Fanapt® in the U.S. and HETLIOZ® in Europe, an increase in the number of employees, including the hiring of new members of theexecutive management team at the end of 2015, as well as increased legal fees associated with ongoing patent litigation. 53 Table of ContentsIntangible asset amortization. Intangible asset amortization decreased by $2.1 million, or 16 %, to $10.9 million for year ended December 31, 2016compared to $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The likelihood of achieving a future milestone obligation that becomes payable to BMSwhen cumulative sales of HETLIOZ® equal $250.0 million was determined to be probable in the first quarter of 2015 resulting in an increase in capitalizedintangible assets of $25.0 million. As a result, intangible asset amortization relating to HETLIOZ® for the year ended December 31, 2015 had includedadditional amortization of $1.2 million for a catch-up adjustment to retroactively record cumulative amortization from February 1 to December 31, 2014relating to the capitalized intangible asset of $25.0 million.Amortization of intangible assets relating to Fanapt® was completed in November 2016 and amounted to $9.2 million for the year ended December 31,2016, compared to $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement with Novartis, Novartis transferredall U.S. and Canadian rights in the Fanapt® franchise to us on December 31, 2014 resulting in an increase in capitalized intangible assets of $15.9 millionthat has been amortized until November 2016. The useful life estimation for the Fanapt® intangible asset was based on the market participant methodologyprescribed by ASC 805, and therefore does not reflect the impact of additional Fanapt® patents solely owned by us with varying expiration dates, the latest ofwhich is December 2031.Provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes was $0.1 million and zero for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.The tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2016 is attributable to activities at our foreign subsidiaries and state income taxes. The tax benefit relatingto the loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 in the U.S. was fully offset by a tax valuation allowance resulting from ourassessment that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon thegeneration of future taxable income during the period in which NOLs and credit carryforwards can be utilized.Liquidity and Capital ResourcesAs of December 31, 2017, our total cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities were $143.4 million compared to $141.3 million atDecember 31, 2016. Our cash and cash equivalents are deposits in operating accounts and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days orless at date of purchase and consist of investments in money market funds with commercial banks and financial institutions, and commercial paper of high-quality corporate issuers. Our marketable securities consist of investments in government sponsored and corporate enterprises and commercial paper.Our liquidity resources as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows: December 31, December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Cash and cash equivalents $33,627 $40,426 Marketable securities: U.S. Treasury and government agencies 60,618 50,647 Corporate debt 49,168 50,267 Total marketable securities 109,786 100,914 Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities $143,413 $141,340 As of December 31, 2017, we maintained all of our cash and cash equivalents in three financial institutions. Deposits held with these institutions mayexceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits, but we do not anticipate any losses with respect to such deposits.We expect to incur substantial costs and expenses throughout 2018 and beyond in connection with our U.S. commercial activities for HETLIOZ® andFanapt®, including Medicaid rebates, the European commercial launch activities for HETLIOZ®, a probable future milestone payment of $25.0 million toBMS in the first half of 2018 when we expect cumulative worldwide sales of HETLIOZ® to reach $250.0 million, a probable future milestone payment of$2.0 million to Lilly due upon enrollment of the first subject into a Phase III study for tradipitant, and the continued clinical development of tradipitant andour other products. Additionally, we continue to pursue market approval of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® in other regions. Because of the uncertainties discussedabove, the costs to advance our research and development projects and the commercial activities for HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® are difficult to estimate andmay vary significantly. Management believes that our existing funds will be sufficient to meet our operating plans for at least the next twelve months. Ourfuture capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, primarily including our ability to generate revenue, thescope and costs of our commercial, manufacturing and process development activities, the magnitude of our discovery, preclinical and clinical developmentprograms, and potential costs to acquire or license the rights to additional products. 54 Table of ContentsWe may need or desire to obtain additional capital to finance our operations through debt, equity or alternative financing arrangements. We may alsoseek capital through collaborations or partnerships with other companies. The issuance of debt could require us to grant liens on certain of our assets that maylimit our flexibility and debt securities may be convertible into common stock. If we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, the terms and pricesfor these financings may be much more favorable to the new investors than the terms obtained by our existing stockholders. These financings also maysignificantly dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of ourfuture activities which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. There can be no assurance that any additional financing requiredin the future will be available on acceptable terms, if at all.Cash flowThe following table summarizes our net cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and2015: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Net cash provided by (used in): Operating activities: Net loss $(15,567) $(18,010) $(39,865) Non-cash charges 13,610 21,015 22,675 Net change in operating assets and liabilities (26) (11,108) 29,639 Operating activities (1,983) (8,103) 12,449 Investing activities: Net purchases of marketable securities (8,567) (8,618) (24,071) Other (1,540) (1,453) (2,527) Investing activities (10,107) (10,071) (26,598) Financing activities: Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options and other 5,251 7,751 4,091 Financing activities 5,251 7,751 4,091 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 40 6 — Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents $(6,799) $(10,417) $(10,058) Year ended December 31, 2017 compared to year ended December 31, 2016Net cash used in operating activities was $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $6.1 million compared with net cash used of$8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease reflects a decrease of $2.4 million in the net loss and a decrease of $11.1 million from thenet change in operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by a decrease of $7.4 million in non-cash charges resulting primarily from completion of theamortization of intangible assets related to Fanapt® in November 2016. The decrease of $11.1 million from the net change in operating assets and liabilitiesprimarily relates to a reduction in accrued government and other rebates, a decrease in accounts receivable attributable to the timing of shipments andpayments, and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other associated with a decrease in prepaid marketing expenses and prepaid royalties.Year ended December 31, 2016 compared to year ended December 31, 2015Net cash used in operating activities was $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $20.6 million compared with net cashprovided of $12.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease reflects a net reduction of $40.7 million from the net change in operatingassets and liabilities, including a decrease in accrued government and other rebates of $36.5 million primarily from sales allowances relating to our initialsales of Fanapt® in 2015 and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $8.9 million, partly offset by a net decrease of $8.4 million in accountsreceivable primarily relating to initial U.S. sales of Fanapt® in 2015. The effect of the net changes in operating assets and liabilities was partially offset by areduction in the net loss of $21.9 million.Off-balance sheet arrangementsWe have no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K. 55 Table of ContentsContractual obligations and commitmentsThe following is a summary of our non-cancellable long-term contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017: Cash payments due by year (1) (2) (in thousands) Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Operating leases $19,789 $2,311 $2,295 $2,351 $2,174 $2,187 $8,471 Milestone obligations (3) (4) 27,000 27,000 — — — — — $46,789 $29,311 $2,295 $2,351 $2,174 $2,187 $8,471 (1)This table does not include various agreements that we have entered into for services with third party vendors, including agreements to conductclinical trials, to manufacture products, and for consulting and other contracted services due to the cancelable nature of the services. We accrued thecosts of these agreements based on estimates of work completed to date. Additionally, this table does not include rebates, chargebacks or discountsrecorded as liabilities at the time that product sales are recognized as revenue.(2)This table does not include potential future milestone obligations under our license agreement with the University of California San Francisco for theexclusive rights to develop and commercialize a portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitors where we could be obligated to make potential futuremilestone payments of up to $46.0 million for regulatory and sales milestones.(3)This table includes a probable future $2.0 million milestone obligation under our license agreement with Lilly, for the exclusive rights to develop andcommercialize tradipitant, which is due upon enrollment of the first subject into a Phase III study for tradipitant. This table does not include otherpotential future milestone obligations under the license agreement of $97.0 million, which consist of $2.0 million due upon the filing of the firstmarketing authorization for tradipitant in either the U.S. or the E.U. and up to $95.0 million for future regulatory approval and sales milestones.(4)This table includes a probable future milestone obligation under our license agreement with BMS, where we are obligated to make a milestonepayment of $25.0 million when cumulative worldwide sales of HETLIOZ® reach $250.0 million, which is expected to occur in the first half of 2018.This obligation is accrued as a current liability in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.Operating leasesCommitments relating to operating leases represent the minimum annual future payments under operating leases and subleases for a total of 40,188square feet of office space for our headquarters office at 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. in Washington, D.C. that expire in 2026, the operating lease for2,880 square feet of office space for our European headquarters in London that has a noncancellable lease term ending in 2021, and 1,249 square feet ofoffice space in Berlin under a short-term operating lease. ITEM 7A.QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKInterest rate risksOur exposure to market risk is currently confined to our cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash. We currently do not hedgeinterest rate exposure. We have not used derivative financial instruments for speculation or trading purposes. Because of the short-term maturities of our cashand cash equivalents and marketable securities, we do not believe that an increase in market rates would have any significant impact on the realized value ofour investments.Concentrations of credit riskWe deposit our cash with financial institutions that we consider to be of high credit quality and purchase marketable securities which are generallyinvestment grade, liquid, short-term fixed income securities and money-market instruments denominated in U.S. dollars. Our marketable securities consist ofcommercial paper, corporate notes and U.S. government agency notes.Revenues and accounts receivable are concentrated with specialty pharmacies and wholesalers. There were six major customers that each accounted formore than 10% of total revenues and, as a group, represented 95% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017. There were four major customersthat each accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable and, as a group, represented 77% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2017. Wemitigate our credit risk relating to accounts receivable from customers by performing ongoing credit evaluations. 56 Table of ContentsForeign currency riskWe are exposed to risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates relating to our foreign operations. The functional currency of ourinternational subsidiaries is the local currency. We are exposed to foreign currency risk to the extent that we enter into transactions denominated incurrencies other than our subsidiaries’ respective functional currencies. We are also exposed to unfavorable fluctuations of the U.S. dollar, which is ourreporting currency, against the currencies of our operating subsidiaries when their respective financial statements are translated into U.S. dollars for inclusionin our consolidated financial statements. We do not currently hedge our foreign currency exchange rate risk. Foreign currency has not had a material impacton our results of operations.Effects of inflationInflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations. ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATAThe consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedules required to be filed are listed in the Index to Consolidated FinancialStatements and are incorporated in Item 15 of Part IV of this annual report on Form 10-K. ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURENone. ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESConclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and ProceduresUnder the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluatedthe effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of December 31, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officerconcluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2017, the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form10-K, to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to ourmanagement, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial ReportingOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in theExchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management conducted an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting based on the original frameworkestablished in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on theassessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. The effectiveness of ourinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered publicaccounting firm, as stated in their report included in this annual report on Form 10-K.Changes in Internal Control over Financial ReportingThere has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) duringthe fourth quarter of 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATIONNone. 57 Table of ContentsPART III ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEInformation required under this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SECwithin 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “CorporateGovernance,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and is incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3)to Form 10-K. ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONInformation required under this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SECwithin 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, under the captions “Corporate Governance” and “Executive Compensation,” and isincorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, except that information required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-Kwill be deemed furnished in this Form 10-K and will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing. ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSInformation required under this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SECwithin 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, under the captions “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “SecurityOwnership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and is incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCEInformation required under this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SECwithin 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, under the caption “Corporate Governance” and is incorporated herein by referencepursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICESInformation required under this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SECwithin 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, under the caption “Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm” and is incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G (3) to Form 10-K.PART IV ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULESThe consolidated financial statements filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.Certain schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financialstatements or notes thereto. The Exhibits are listed in the Exhibit Index. 58 Table of ContentsSignaturesPursuant to the requirements of Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this annualreport on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.February 15, 2018 By: /s/ Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. President and Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this annual report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalfof the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Name Title Date/s/ Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D.Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. President and Chief Executive Officer andDirector (principal executive officer) February 15, 2018/s/ James P. KellyJames P. Kelly Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer (principal financial February 15, 2018 officer and principal accounting officer) /s/ H. Thomas WatkinsH. Thomas Watkins Chairman of the Board andDirector February 15, 2018/s/ Kenneth M. BateKenneth M. Bate Director February 15, 2018/s/ Michael ColaMichael Cola Director February 15, 2018/s/ Richard W. DuganRichard W. Dugan Director February 15, 2018/s/ Vincent J. MilanoVincent J. Milano Director February 15, 2018 59 Table of ContentsVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.Index to Consolidated Financial Statements Page Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 61 Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 62 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 63 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 64 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 65 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 66 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 67 60 Table of ContentsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmTo the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial ReportingWe have audited the consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its subsidiaries as listed in theaccompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2017 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of SponsoringOrganizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as ofDecember 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all materialrespects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the COSO.Basis for OpinionsThe Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on InternalControl over Financial Reporting under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securitieslaws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internalcontrol over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financialstatements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles usedand significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internalcontrol over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weaknessexists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial ReportingA company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal controlover financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairlyreflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permitpreparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are beingmade only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention ortimely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation ofeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBaltimore, MDFebruary 15, 2018We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2003. 61 Table of ContentsVANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31, December 31, (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts) 2017 2016 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $33,627 $40,426 Marketable securities 109,786 100,914 Accounts receivable, net 17,601 20,268 Inventory 840 779 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 8,003 11,788 Total current assets 169,857 174,175 Property and equipment, net 5,306 5,015 Intangible assets, net 26,069 27,819 Non-current inventory and other 4,193 3,365 Total assets $205,425 $210,374 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $20,335 $16,196 Accrued government and other rebates 23,028 34,124 Milestone obligations under license agreements 27,000 — Total current liabilities 70,363 50,320 Milestone obligations under license agreements — 25,000 Other non-current liabilities 3,675 3,724 Total liabilities 74,038 79,044 Commitments and contingencies (Notes 11 and 16) Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, and no shares issued or outstanding — — Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 44,938,133 and 44,000,614 shares issuedand outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively 45 44 Additional paid-in capital 492,802 477,087 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (34) 58 Accumulated deficit (361,426) (345,859) Total stockholders’ equity 131,387 131,330 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $205,425 $210,374 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 62 Table of ContentsVANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Year Ended December 31, (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts) 2017 2016 2015 Revenues: Net product sales $165,083 $146,017 $109,925 Total revenues 165,083 146,017 109,925 Operating expenses: Cost of goods sold, excluding amortization 17,848 24,712 23,462 Research and development 38,547 29,156 29,145 Selling, general and administrative 123,841 99,787 84,531 Intangible asset amortization 1,750 10,933 12,972 Total operating expenses 181,986 164,588 150,110 Loss from operations (16,903) (18,571) (40,185) Other income 1,472 665 320 Loss before income taxes (15,431) (17,906) (39,865) Provision for income taxes 136 104 — Net loss $(15,567) $(18,010) $(39,865) Net loss per share: Basic $(0.35) $(0.41) $(0.94) Diluted $(0.35) $(0.41) $(0.94) Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 44,735,146 43,449,441 42,250,254 Diluted 44,735,146 43,449,441 42,250,254 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 63 Table of ContentsVANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Net loss $(15,567) $(18,010) $(39,865) Other comprehensive income: Net foreign currency translation gain (loss) 30 (1) — Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities (122) 20 23 Tax provision on other comprehensive income — — — Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (92) 19 23 Comprehensive loss $(15,659) $(17,991) $(39,842) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 64 Table of ContentsVANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Additional Other Common Stock Paid-in Comprehensive Accumulated (in thousands, except for share amounts) Shares Par Value Capital Income (Loss) Deficit Total Balances at December 31, 2014 41,486,361 $41 $448,744 $16 $(287,984) $160,817 Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options and settlement of restricted stock units 1,353,877 2 4,372 — — 4,374 Shares withheld upon settlement of equity awards (24,947) — (283) — — (283) Stock-based compensation expense — — 7,961 — — 7,961 Net loss — — — — (39,865) (39,865) Other comprehensive income, net of tax — — — 23 — 23 Balances at December 31, 2015 42,815,291 43 460,794 39 (327,849) 133,027 Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options and settlement of restricted stock units 1,185,323 1 7,750 — — 7,751 Stock-based compensation expense — — 8,543 — — 8,543 Net loss — — — — (18,010) (18,010) Other comprehensive income, net of tax — — — 19 — 19 Balances at December 31, 2016 44,000,614 44 477,087 58 (345,859) 131,330 Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options andsettlement of restricted stock units 937,519 1 5,250 — — 5,251 Stock-based compensation expense — — 10,465 — — 10,465 Net loss — — — — (15,567) (15,567) Other comprehensive loss, net of tax — — — (92) — (92) Balances at December 31, 2017 44,938,133 $45 $492,802 $(34) $(361,426) $131,387 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 65 Table of ContentsVANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Cash flows from operating activities Net loss $(15,567) $(18,010) $(39,865) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation of property and equipment 1,234 935 582 Stock-based compensation 10,465 8,543 7,961 Amortization of (discounts) premiums on marketable securities (426) 62 677 Intangible asset amortization 1,750 10,933 12,972 Other non-cash adjustments, net 587 542 483 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 2,525 (4,298) (12,677) Prepaid expenses and other assets 3,652 (6,159) (2,558) Inventory (1,060) 200 387 Accounts payable and other liabilities 5,953 575 9,432 Accrued government and other rebates (11,096) (1,426) 35,055 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (1,983) (8,103) 12,449 Cash flows from investing activities Purchases of property and equipment (1,664) (1,407) (2,527) Purchases of marketable securities (148,135) (165,405) (193,111) Proceeds from sale of marketable securities — — 999 Maturities of marketable securities 139,568 156,787 168,041 Other investing activities 124 (46) — Net cash used in investing activities (10,107) (10,071) (26,598) Cash flows from financing activities Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options 5,251 7,751 4,374 Tax obligations paid in connection with settlement of restricted stock units — — (283) Net cash provided by financing activities 5,251 7,751 4,091 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 40 6 — Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (6,799) (10,417) (10,058) Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year 40,426 50,843 60,901 End of year $33,627 $40,426 $50,843 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 66 Table of ContentsVANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS1. Business Organization and PresentationBusiness organizationVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovativetherapies to address high unmet medical needs and improve the lives of patients. The Company commenced its operations in 2003 and operates in onereporting segment. The Company’s portfolio includes the following products: • HETLIOZ® (tasimelteon), a product for the treatment of Non-24-Hour Sleep-Wake Disorder (Non-24), was approved by the U.S. Food and DrugAdministration (FDA) in January 2014 and launched commercially in the U.S. in April 2014. In July 2015, the European Commission (EC)granted centralized marketing authorization with unified labeling for HETLIOZ® for the treatment of Non-24 in totally blind adults. HETLIOZ®was commercially launched in Germany in August 2016. HETLIOZ® has potential utility in a number of other circadian rhythm disorders and ispresently in clinical development for the treatment of Pediatric Non-24, Jet Lag Disorder and Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS). • Fanapt® (iloperidone), a product for the treatment of schizophrenia, the oral formulation of which was approved by the FDA in May 2009 andlaunched commercially in the U.S. by Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis) in January of 2010. Novartis transferred all the U.S. and Canadiancommercial rights to the Fanapt® franchise to the Company on December 31, 2014. Additionally, the Company’s distribution partners launchedFanapt® in Israel and Mexico in 2014. Fanapt® has potential utility in a number of other disorders. An assessment of new Fanapt® clinicalopportunities is ongoing. • Tradipitant (VLY-686), a small molecule neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) antagonist, which is presently in clinical development for the treatmentof chronic pruritus in atopic dermatitis and the treatment of gastroparesis. • VTR-297 (formerly Trichostatin A), a small molecule histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. • VQW-765 (formerly AQW-051), a Phase II alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist. • Portfolio of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) activators and inhibitors.Basis of presentationThe accompanying consolidated financial statements includes the accounts of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and havebeen prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.). All intercompany accounts andtransactions have been eliminated in consolidation.2. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesUse of EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requiresmanagement to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, disclosure of contingent assetsand liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Management continually re-evaluates its estimates, judgmentsand assumptions, and management’s evaluation could change. Actual results could differ from those estimates.Cash and Cash EquivalentsFor purposes of the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents represent highly-liquid investments with amaturity date of three months or less at the date of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents includes investments in money market funds with commercial banksand financial institutions, and commercial paper of high-quality corporate issuers. Restricted cash of $0.7 million and $0.8 million relating primarily toleases for office space is included in other current and other non-current assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016. 67 Table of ContentsMarketable SecuritiesThe Company classifies all of its marketable securities as available-for-sale securities. The Company’s investment policy requires the selection of high-quality issuers, with bond ratings of AAA to A1+/P1. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported asa component of stockholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income/loss. At each balance sheet date, the Company assesses available-for-salesecurities in an unrealized loss position to determine whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. If declines in the value of available-for-salesecurities are determined to be other-than-temporary, a loss is recorded in earnings in the current period. Interest and dividend income is recorded whenearned and included in interest income. Premiums and discounts on marketable securities are amortized and accreted, respectively, to maturity and includedin interest income. The Company uses the specific identification method in computing realized gains and losses on the sale of investments, which would beincluded in the consolidated statements of operations when generated. Marketable securities with a maturity of more than one year as of the balance sheetdate and which the Company does not intend to sell within the next twelve months are classified as non-current. All other marketable securities are classifiedas current.InventoryInventory, which is recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value, includes the cost of third-party manufacturing and other direct and indirectcosts and is valued using the first-in, first-out method. The Company capitalizes inventory costs associated with its products upon regulatory approval when,based on management’s judgment, future commercialization is considered probable and the future economic benefit is expected to be realized; otherwise,such costs are expensed as research and development. Inventory not expected to be sold within 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified asnon-current.Intangible AssetsCosts incurred for products not yet approved by the FDA and for which no alternative future use exists are recorded as expense. Obligations formilestone payments to other pharmaceutical companies that may result in a capitalized intangible asset are recognized when it is deemed probable that themilestone event will occur. In the event a product has been approved by the FDA or an alternative future use exists for a product, patent and license costs arecapitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful economic life of the of the related product patents. For intangible assets related toHETLIOZ®, the estimated useful life is based on the U.S. method of use patent that expires in May 2034. Intangible assets related Fanapt® have been fullyamortized on a straight-line basis to November 2016. The useful life estimate for Fanapt® was based on the market participant methodology prescribed byASC 805, and therefore does not reflect the impact of additional Fanapt® patents solely owned by the Company with varying expiration dates, the latest ofwhich is December 2031.Property and EquipmentProperty and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The costs of leasehold improvements funded by or reimbursed by the lessorare capitalized and amortized as leasehold improvements along with a corresponding deferred rent liability. Depreciation of most property and equipment isprovided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using a straight-line basis over the lesserof the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms of the related leases. The costs of additions and improvements are capitalized, and repairs andmaintenance costs are charged to operations in the period incurred. Upon retirement or disposition of property and equipment, the cost and accumulateddepreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the statement of operations for that period.Accounts Payable and Accrued LiabilitiesThe Company’s management is required to estimate accrued liabilities as part of the process of preparing financial statements. The estimation ofaccrued liabilities involves identifying services that have been performed on the Company’s behalf, and then estimating the level of service performed andthe associated cost incurred for such services as of each balance sheet date in the financial statements. Accrued liabilities include research and developmentexpenses, such as accrued costs under contracts with clinical monitors, data management organizations and investigators in conjunction with clinical trials,fees to contract manufacturers in conjunction with the production of clinical materials, consulting and professional fees, such as lawyers and fees formarketing and other commercialization activities, accrued compensation and employee benefits, such as accrued bonus, royalties payable under licensingagreements, and other accrued fees. Pursuant to management’s assessment of the services that have been performed on clinical trials and other contracts, theCompany recognizes these expenses as the services are provided. Such management assessments include, but are not limited to: (i) an evaluation by theproject manager of the work that has been completed during the period, (ii) measurement of progress prepared internally and/or provided by the third-partyservice provider, (iii) analyses of data that justify the progress, and (iv) management’s judgment. In the event that the Company does not identify certaincosts that have begun to be incurred or the Company under- or over-estimates the level of services performed or the costs of such services, the Company’sreported expenses for such period would be too low or too high. 68 Table of ContentsNet Product SalesThe Company’s net product sales consist of sales of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt®. Net sales by product for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and2015 were as follows: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 HETLIOZ® product sales, net $89,978 $71,671 $44,302 Fanapt® product sales, net 75,105 74,346 65,623 $165,083 $146,017 $109,925 The Company applies the revenue recognition guidance in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting StandardsCodification (ASC) Subtopic 605-15, Revenue Recognition—Products. The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when there is persuasiveevidence that an arrangement exists, title to product and associated risk of loss has passed to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable, collectability isreasonably assured and the Company has no further performance obligations.Major CustomersHETLIOZ® is only available in the U.S. for distribution through a limited number of specialty pharmacies, and is not available in retail pharmacies.Fanapt® is available in the U.S. for distribution through a limited number of wholesalers and is available in retail pharmacies. The Company invoices andrecords revenue when its customers, specialty pharmacies and wholesalers, receive product from the third-party logistics warehouse. Revenues and accountsreceivable are concentrated with these customers. The following table presents each major customer that represented more than 10% of total revenues for theyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: Year Ended December 31, Percent of Net Product Sales 2017 2016 2015 Distributor A 32% 23% 14% Distributor B 15% 16% 18% Distributor C 15% 16% 19% Distributor D 12% 15% 17% Distributor E 11% 16% 14% Distributor F 10% 1% 0% Distributor G — 9% 12% The following table presents each major customer that represented more than 10% of accounts receivable, net, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, Percent of Accounts Receivable, Net 2017 2016 Distributor A 28% 22% Distributor B 18% 19% Distributor C 10% 15% Distributor D 21% 25% Distributor E 8% 11% Product Sales Discounts and AllowancesThe Company’s product sales are recorded net of applicable discounts, rebates, chargebacks, service fees, co-pay assistance and product returnsestimates that are applicable for various government and commercial payors. Reserves established for discounts and returns are classified as reductions ofaccounts receivable if the amount is payable to direct customers, with the exception of service fees. Service fees are classified as a liability. Reservesestablished for rebates, chargebacks or co-pay assistance are classified as a liability if the amount is payable to a party other than customers. The Companycurrently records sales allowances for the following:Prompt-pay: Specialty pharmacies and wholesalers are offered discounts for prompt payment. The Company expects that the specialty pharmacies andwholesalers will earn prompt payment discounts and, therefore, deducts the full amount of these discounts from total product sales when revenues arerecognized. 69 Table of ContentsRebates: Allowances for rebates include mandated and supplemental discounts under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program as well as contracted rebateprograms with other payors. Rebate amounts owed after the final dispensing of the product to a benefit plan participant are based upon contractualagreements or legal requirements with public sector benefit providers, such as Medicaid. The allowance for rebates is based on statutory or contracteddiscount rates and expected utilization. Estimates for the expected utilization of rebates are based on historical activity and, where available, actualand pending prescriptions for which the Company has validated the insurance benefits. Rebates are generally invoiced and paid in arrears, such thatthe accrual balance consists of an estimate of the amount expected to be incurred for the current quarter’s activity, plus an accrual balance for knownprior quarter’s unpaid rebates. If actual future invoicing varies from estimates, the Company may need to adjust accruals, which would affect netrevenue in the period of adjustment.Chargebacks: Chargebacks are discounts that occur when contracted indirect customers purchase directly from specialty pharmacies and wholesalers.Contracted indirect customers, which currently consist primarily of Public Health Service institutions, non-profit clinics, and Federal governmententities purchasing via the Federal Supply Schedule, generally purchase the product at a discounted price. The specialty pharmacy or wholesaler, inturn, charges back the difference between the price initially paid by the specialty pharmacy or wholesaler and the discounted price paid to the specialtypharmacy or wholesaler by the contracted customer. The allowance for chargebacks is based on historical activity and, where available, actual andpending prescriptions for which the Company has validated the insurance benefits.Medicare Part D Coverage Gap: Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit mandates manufacturers to fund approximately 50% of the Medicare Part Dinsurance coverage gap for prescription drugs sold to eligible patients. Vanda accounts for the Medicare Part D coverage gap using a point of salemodel. Estimates for expected Medicare Part D coverage gap are based in part on historical activity and, where available, actual and pendingprescriptions for which the Company has validated the insurance benefits. Funding of the coverage gap is generally invoiced and paid in arrears so thatthe accrual balance consists of an estimate of the amount expected to be incurred for the current quarter’s activity, plus an accrual balance for knownprior quarter activity. If actual future funding varies from estimates, the Company may need to adjust accruals, which would affect net revenue in theperiod of adjustment.Service Fees: The Company incurs specialty pharmacy and wholesaler fees for services and their data. These fees are based on contracted terms and areknown amounts. The Company accrues service fees at the time of revenue recognition, resulting in a reduction of product sales and the recognition ofan accrued liability, unless it receives an identifiable and separate benefit for the consideration and it can reasonably estimate the fair value of thebenefit received. In which case, service fees are recorded as selling, general and administrative expense.Co-payment Assistance: Patients who have commercial insurance and meet certain eligibility requirements may receive co-payment assistance. Co-payassistance utilization is based on information provided by the Company’s third-party administrator. The allowance for co-pay assistance is based onactual sales and an estimate for pending sales based on either historical activity or pending sales for which the Company has validated the insurancebenefits.Product Returns: Consistent with industry practice, the Company generally offers direct customers a limited right to return as defined within theCompany’s returns policy. The Company considers several factors in the estimation process, including historical return activity, expiration dates ofproduct shipped to specialty pharmacies, inventory levels within the distribution channel, product shelf life, prescription trends and other relevantfactors. The following table summarizes activity for product returns as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: (in thousands) Balance at December 31, 2014 $85 Additions 986 Credits/payments (12) Balance at December 31, 2015 1,059 Additions 2,507 Credits/payments (486) Balance at December 31, 2016 3,080 Additions 5,978 Credits/payments (4,939) Balance at December 31, 2017 $4,119 70 Table of ContentsCost of Goods SoldCost of goods sold includes royalties payable, the cost of inventory sold, manufacturing and supply chain costs and product shipping and handlingcosts related to sales of HETLIOZ® and Fanapt® to the Company’s distribution partners.Research and Development ExpensesResearch and development expenses consist primarily of fees for services provided by third parties in connection with the clinical trials, costs ofcontract manufacturing services, milestone payments, costs of materials used in clinical trials and research and development, costs for regulatory consultantsand filings, depreciation of capital resources used to develop products, related facilities costs, and salaries, other employee-related costs and stock-basedcompensation for research and development personnel. The Company expenses research and development costs as they are incurred for products in thedevelopment stage, including manufacturing costs and milestone payments made under license agreements prior to FDA approval. Upon and subsequent toFDA approval, manufacturing and milestone payments related to license agreements are capitalized. Milestone payments are accrued when it is deemedprobable that the milestone event will be achieved. Costs related to the acquisition of intellectual property are expensed as incurred if the underlyingtechnology is developed in connection with the Company’s research and development efforts and has no alternative future use.Selling, General and Administrative ExpensesSelling, general and administrative expenses consist of salaries, stock-based compensation, facilities and third party expenses. Selling, general andadministrative expenses are associated with the activities of the executive, finance, accounting, information technology, business development, commercialsupport, trade and distribution, sales, marketing, legal, medical affairs and human resource functions. Additionally, selling, general and administrativeexpenses included an estimate for the annual Patient Protection and Affordable Care fee.Stock-Based CompensationCompensation costs for all stock-based awards to employees and directors are measured based on the grant date fair value of those awards andrecognized over the period during which the employee or director is required to perform service in exchange for the award. The Company recognizes theexpense over the award’s vesting period. The fair value of stock options granted and restricted stock units (RSUs) awarded are amortized using the straight-line method. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, ithas been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeituresdiffer from those estimates.Advertising ExpenseThe Company expenses the costs of advertising, including branded promotional expenses, as incurred. Branded advertising expenses, recorded inselling, general and administrative expenses, were $1.3 million, $1.4 million and $3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,respectively.Foreign CurrencyThe reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of the Company’s international subsidiaries is the local currency.Assets and liabilities, including inter-company balances for which settlement is anticipated in the foreseeable future, denominated in foreign currencies aretranslated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Foreign currency equity balances are translated at historical rates. Revenues and expensesdenominated in foreign currencies are translated at average exchange rates for the respective periods. Foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded inaccumulated other comprehensive income.Transactions denominated in currencies other than subsidiaries’ functional currencies are recorded based on exchange rates at the time suchtransactions arise. Changes in exchange rates with respect to amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets related to these items will result inunrealized foreign currency transaction gains and losses based upon period-end exchange rates. The Company also records realized foreign currencytransaction gains and losses upon settlement of the transactions. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in other income and amounted toincome of $0.1 million, a loss of $0.2 million, and zero for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 71 Table of ContentsIncome TaxesThe Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, current income tax expense orbenefit is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is recognized forfuture tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective taxbases and tax credits and loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likelythan not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Tax rate changes are reflected in income during the period such changes areenacted. Changes in ownership may limit the amount of NOL carryforwards that can be utilized in the future to offset taxable income.Non-Cash Investing and Financing ActivitiesPurchases of property and equipment accrued in current liabilities amounted to zero, $0.2 million and $0.2 million for each of the years endedDecember 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The acquisition of an intangible asset relating to HETLIOZ® accrued in non-current liabilities amounted to$25.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.Certain Risks and UncertaintiesThe Company’s products under development require approval from the FDA or other international regulatory agencies prior to commercial sales. Therecan be no assurance the products will receive the necessary clearance. If the Company is denied clearance or clearance is delayed, it may have a materialadverse impact on the Company.The Company’s products are concentrated in rapidly-changing, highly-competitive markets, which are characterized by rapid technological advances,changes in customer requirements and evolving regulatory requirements and industry standards. Any failure by the Company to anticipate or to respondadequately to technological developments in its industry, changes in customer requirements or changes in regulatory requirements or industry standards orany significant delays in the development or introduction of products or services could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operatingresults and future cash flows.The Company depends on single source suppliers for critical raw materials for manufacturing, as well as other components required for theadministration of its products. The loss of these suppliers could delay the clinical trials or prevent or delay commercialization of the products.Concentrations of Credit RiskFinancial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalentsand marketable securities. The Company places its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities with highly-rated financial institutions. At December 31,2017, the Company maintained all of its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in three financial institutions. Deposits held with these institutionsmay exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand, and the Company believes there isminimal risk of losses on such balances.Segment and Geographic InformationThe Company operates in one reporting segment and, accordingly, no segment disclosures are presented herein. Foreign sales were not material foreach of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.Recent Accounting PronouncementsIn November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-18, Restricted Cash. The new standard requires that a statement of cashflows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cashequivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalentswhen reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annualreporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company willadopt this new standard in the first quarter of 2018. Under the new standard, the Company will reclassify its restricted cash amounts within the consolidatedstatements of cash flows and include footnote disclosures to be able to reconcile amounts per the consolidated balance sheets to the statement of cash flows.In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, to clarifyguidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flow. The standard is effective for annual reporting periodsbeginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt this newstandard in the first quarter of 2018. Adoption of this new standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financialstatements. 72 Table of ContentsIn June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, related to the measurement of credit losses on financialinstruments. The standard will require the use of an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. The standard is effective for yearsbeginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is evaluating this standardto determine if adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, to simplify various aspects related tohow share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. The ASU provides that all of the tax effects related to share-basedpayments are recorded as part of the provision for income taxes, allows entities to withhold an amount up to the employees’ maximum individual tax rate inthe relevant jurisdiction, allows entities to estimate the effect of forfeitures or recognized forfeitures when they occur, and other improvements to theaccounting for share-based awards. The new standard was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annualperiods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this new standard in the first quarter of 2017. As a result of adoption of the new guidance,the Company recognized deferred tax assets related to the previously unrecognized tax benefits, fully reduced by a valuation allowance as it is more likelythan not that such benefits will not be realized. The Company will recognize excess tax benefits arising from share-based payments in the Company’sprovision for income taxes as opposed to additional paid-in capital on a prospective basis. Additionally, the Company elected to continue to estimate theimpact of forfeitures when determining the amount of compensation cost to be recognized each period rather than to account for them as they occur. Theremaining updates required by this standard did not have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The new standard requires that lessees will need to recognize a right-of-use asset and a leaseliability for virtually all of their leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The liability will be equal to the present value of leasepayments. The asset will be based on the liability subject to certain adjustments. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiringleases to be classified as either operating or finance. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current operating leases) while financeleases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current capital leases). The new standard is effective for annual periods beginning afterDecember 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluatingthis standard to determine if adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This new standard requires companies to recognize revenuewhen it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchangefor those goods or services. Under the new standard, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of a good or service. The standard allows for twotransition methods—entities can either apply the new standard (i) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or (ii) retrospectively with thecumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial adoption. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue fromContracts with Customers, which defers the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,beginning after that date. Early adoption of the standard is permitted, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. In March 2016, theFASB issued ASU 2016-08 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue versus Net), in April 2016,the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, and in May 2016, the FASBissued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which provide additionalclarification on certain topics addressed in ASU 2014-09. ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, and ASU 2016-12 follow the same implementation guidelines as ASU2014-09 and ASU 2015-14. The analysis identifying areas that will be impacted by the new guidance as well as the impacts to the consolidated financialstatements and related disclosures is substantially complete. As part of the analysis, the Company completed an analysis of existing contracts with itscustomers and assessed the differences in accounting for such contracts under this guidance compared with current revenue accounting standards. Based onits review of customer contracts, adoption of the new standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s revenue from product sales. TheCompany will adopt the new standard on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.3. Earnings per ShareBasic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. DilutedEPS is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, plus potential outstanding common stockfor the period. Potential outstanding common stock includes stock options and shares underlying RSUs, but only to the extent that their inclusion is dilutive. 73 Table of ContentsThe following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2017,2016, and 2015: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts) 2017 2016 2015 Numerator: Net loss $(15,567) $(18,010) $(39,865) Denominator: Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted 44,735,146 43,449,441 42,250,254 Net loss per share, basic and diluted: Basic $(0.35) $(0.41) $(0.94) Diluted $(0.35) $(0.41) $(0.94) Antidilutive securities excluded from calculations of diluted netincome (loss) per share 3,136,515 4,943,797 5,660,199 The Company incurred a net loss for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 causing inclusion of any potentially dilutivesecurities to have an anti-dilutive effect, resulting in dilutive loss per share and basic loss per share attributable to common stockholders being equivalent.4. Marketable SecuritiesThe following is a summary of the Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities as of December 31, 2017, all of which have contract maturities ofless than one year: Gross Gross Fair December 31, 2017 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market (in thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value U.S. Treasury and government agencies $60,681 $— $(63) $60,618 Corporate debt 49,168 12 (12) 49,168 $109,849 $12 $(75) $109,786 The following is a summary of the Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities as of December 31, 2016: Gross Gross Fair December 31, 2016 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market (in thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value U.S. Treasury and government agencies $50,661 $3 $(17) $50,647 Corporate debt 50,194 89 (16) 50,267 $100,855 $92 $(33) $100,914 5. Fair Value MeasurementsAuthoritative guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: • Level 1 — defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets • Level 2 — defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable • Level 3 — defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptionsMarketable securities classified in Level 1 and Level 2 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of cash equivalents and available-for-sale marketablesecurities. The valuation of Level 1 instruments is determined using a market approach, and is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets inactive markets. The valuation of investments classified in Level 2 also is determined using a market approach based upon quoted prices for similar assets inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 2 securities include certificates of deposit,commercial paper and corporate notes that use as their basis readily observable market parameters. The Company did not transfer any assets between Level 2and Level 1 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. 74 Table of ContentsThe Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017, as follows: Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2017 Using Quoted Prices in Significant Active Markets for Significant Other Unobservable December 31, Identical Assets Observable Inputs Inputs (in thousands) 2017 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) U.S. Treasury and government agencies 60,618 60,618 — — Corporate debt 53,164 — 53,164 — $113,782 $60,618 $53,164 $— Total assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2017 include $4.0 million of cash equivalents.The Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016, as follows: Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2016 Using Quoted Prices in Significant Active Markets for Significant Other Unobservable December 31, Identical Assets Observable Inputs Inputs (in thousands) 2016 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) U.S. Treasury and government agencies $50,647 $50,647 $— $— Corporate debt 50,267 — 50,267 — $100,914 $50,647 $50,267 $— The Company also has financial assets and liabilities, not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, which primarily consist of cash andcash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, the carrying value of which materially approximate their fairvalues.6. InventoryThe Company evaluates expiry risk by evaluating current and future product demand relative to product shelf life. The Company builds demandforecasts by considering factors such as, but not limited to, overall market potential, market share, market acceptance and patient usage. Inventory levels areevaluated for the amount of inventory that would be sold within one year. At certain times, the level of inventory can exceed the forecasted level of cost ofgoods sold for the next twelve months. The Company classifies the estimate of such inventory as non-current. Inventory consisted of the following as ofDecember 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Current assets Work-in-process $80 $17 Finished goods 760 762 $840 $779 Non-Current assets Raw materials $87 $127 Work-in-process 2,821 2,225 Finished goods 408 83 $3,316 $2,435 75 Table of Contents7. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current AssetsThe following is a summary of the Company’s prepaid expenses and other current assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Research and development expenses $2,415 $2,397 Consulting and other professional fees 2,876 6,051 Prepaid royalties — 1,761 Other 2,712 1,579 $8,003 $11,788 76 Table of Contents8. Property and EquipmentThe following is a summary of the Company’s property and equipment, at cost, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016: Estimated Useful Life December 31, (in thousands) (Years) 2017 2016 Computer and other equipment 3 $3,342 $2,426 Furniture and fixtures 5 - 7 1,929 1,412 Leasehold improvements 5 - 11 4,515 4,408 9,786 8,246 Accumulated depreciation and amortization (4,480) (3,231) $5,306 $5,015 Depreciation expense was $1.2 million, $0.9 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.9. Intangible AssetsHETLIOZ®. In January 2014, the Company announced that the FDA had approved the New Drug Application (NDA) for HETLIOZ®. As a result of thisapproval, the Company met a milestone under its license agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) that required the Company to make a license paymentof $8.0 million to BMS. The $8.0 million is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic useful life of the related product patentswhich is the remaining life of the U.S. method of use patent for HETLIOZ® that expires in May 2034.The Company is obligated to make a future milestone payment to BMS of $25.0 million when cumulative worldwide sales of HETLIOZ® reach$250.0 million, which is expected to occur in the first half of 2018. The future obligation of $25.0 million was recorded as a current liability as ofDecember 31, 2017 and as a non-current liability as of December 31, 2016. The $25.0 million was determined to be additional consideration for theacquisition of the HETLIOZ® intangible asset. The intangible asset of $25.0 million is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economicuseful life of the related product patents which is the remaining life of the U.S. method of use patent for HETLIOZ® that expires in May 2034.Fanapt®. In 2009, the Company announced that the FDA had approved the NDA for Fanapt®. As a result of this approval, the Company met amilestone under its original sublicense agreement with Novartis that required the Company to make a license payment of $12.0 million to Novartis. The$12.0 million was amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the U.S. composition of matter patent for Fanapt® to November 2016.Pursuant to a settlement agreement in December 2014, Novartis transferred all U.S. and Canadian rights in the Fanapt® franchise to the Company. As aresult, the Company recognized an intangible asset of $15.9 million on December 31, 2014 related to the reacquired rights to Fanapt®, which was fullyamortized on a straight-line basis as of November 2016. The useful life estimation for the Fanapt® intangible asset was based on the market participantmethodology prescribed by ASC 805, and therefore does not reflect the impact of additional Fanapt® patents solely owned by the Company with varyingexpiration dates, the latest of which is December 2031.The following is a summary of the Company’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2017: December 31, 2017 Estimated Gross Net Useful Life Carrying Accumulated Carrying (in thousands) (Years) Amount Amortization Amount HETLIOZ® May 2034 $33,000 $6,931 $26,069 Fanapt® November 2016 27,941 27,941 — $60,941 $34,872 $26,069 77 Table of ContentsThe following is a summary of the Company’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2016: December 31, 2016 Estimated Gross Net Useful Life Carrying Accumulated Carrying (in thousands) (Years) Amount Amortization Amount HETLIOZ® January 2033 $33,000 $5,181 $27,819 Fanapt® November 2016 27,941 27,941 — $60,941 $33,122 $27,819 Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful economic life using the straight-line method. Amortization expense for the years endedDecember 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 HETLIOZ® $1,750 $1,721 $2,922 Fanapt® — 9,212 10,050 $1,750 $10,933 $12,972 The following is a summary of the future intangible asset amortization schedule as of December 31, 2017: (in thousands) Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter HETLIOZ® $26,069 $1,545 $1,591 $1,591 $1,591 $1,591 $18,160 10. Accounts Payable and Accrued LiabilitiesThe following is a summary of the Company’s accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Research and development expenses $4,663 $3,024 Consulting and other professional fees 3,961 3,192 Compensation and employee benefits 5,323 4,291 Royalties payable 4,394 4,555 Other 1,994 1,134 $20,335 $16,196 11. Commitments and ContingenciesOperating LeasesCommitments relating to operating leases represent the minimum annual future payments under operating leases and subleases for a total of 40,188square feet of office space for the Company’s headquarters at 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. in Washington, D.C. that expire in 2026, the operating leasefor 2,880 square feet of office space for the Company’s European headquarters in London that has a noncancellable lease term ending in 2021, and 1,249square feet of office space in Berlin under a short-term operating lease. The following is a summary of the minimum annual future payments under operatingleases and subleases for office space as of December 31, 2017: Cash payments due by year (in thousands) Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Operating leases $19,789 $2,311 $2,295 $2,351 $2,174 $2,187 $8,471 In 2011, the Company entered into an operating lease for its headquarters at 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. in Washington, D.C. for 21,400 squarefeet of office space. A lease amendment in 2014 increased the office space under lease to 30,260 square feet, and a lease amendment in June 2016 extendedthe lease term from April 2023 to September 2026. Subject to the prior rights of other tenants, the Company has the right to renew the lease for five yearsfollowing its expiration. The Company has the right to sublease or assign all or a portion of the premises, subject to standard conditions. The lease may beterminated early by the Company or the landlord under certain circumstances.In June 2016, the Company entered into a sublease under which the Company leases 9,928 square feet of office space for its headquarters at 2200Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. in Washington, D.C. The sublease term began in January 2017 and ends in July 2026, but may be terminated earlier by eitherparty under certain circumstances. The Company has the right to sublease or assign all or a portion of the premises, subject to standard conditions. 78 Table of ContentsRent expense under operating leases and subleases, was $3.2 million, $2.5 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and2015, respectively.Guarantees and IndemnificationsThe Company has entered into a number of standard intellectual property indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of its business. Pursuantto these agreements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by theindemnified party, generally the Company’s business partners or customers, in connection with any U.S. patent or any copyright or other intellectual propertyinfringement claim by any third party with respect to the Company’s products. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual from thedate of execution of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnificationagreements is unlimited. Since inception, the Company has not incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements.The Company also indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain conditions.License AgreementsThe Company’s rights to develop and commercialize its products are subject to the terms and conditions of licenses granted to the Company by otherpharmaceutical companies.HETLIOZ®. In February 2004, the Company entered into a license agreement with BMS under which it received an exclusive worldwide license undercertain patents and patent applications, and other licenses to intellectual property, to develop and commercialize HETLIOZ®. As a result of the FDA’sapproval of the HETLIOZ® NDA in January 2014, the Company made an $8.0 million milestone payment to BMS in the first quarter of 2014 under thelicense agreement that was capitalized as an intangible asset and is being amortized over the estimated economic useful life of the related product patentswhich is the remaining life of the U.S. method of use patent for HETLIOZ® in the U.S. The Company is obligated to make a future milestone payment to BMSof $25.0 million when cumulative worldwide sales of HETLIOZ® reach $250.0 million, which is expected to occur in the first half of 2018. The probablefuture $25.0 million milestone obligation was capitalized as an intangible asset in the first quarter of 2015 and is being amortized over the estimatedeconomic useful life of the related product patents which is the remaining life of the U.S. method of use patent for HETLIOZ® in the U.S. Additionally, theCompany is obligated to make royalty payments on HETLIOZ® net sales to BMS in any territory where the Company commercializes HETLIOZ® for aperiod equal to the greater of 10 years following the first commercial sale in the territory or the expiry of the new chemical entity patent in that territory.During the period prior to the expiry of the new chemical entity patent in a territory, the Company is obligated to pay a 10% royalty on net sales in thatterritory. The royalty rate is decreased by half for countries in which no new chemical entity patent existed or for the remainder of the 10 years after the expiryof the new chemical entity patent. The Company is also obligated under the license agreement to pay BMS a percentage of any sublicense fees, upfrontpayments and milestone and other payments (excluding royalties) that it receives from a third party in connection with any sublicensing arrangement, at arate which is in the mid-twenties. The Company has agreed with BMS in the license agreement for HETLIOZ® to use its commercially reasonable efforts todevelop and commercialize HETLIOZ®.Fanapt ®. Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement with Novartis, Novartis transferred all U.S. and Canadian rights in the Fanapt® franchise tothe Company on December 31, 2014. The Company was obligated to make royalty payments to Sanofi S.A. (Sanofi) and Titan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Titan) ata percentage rate equal to 23% on annual U.S. net sales of Fanapt® up to $200.0 million, and at a percentage rate in the mid-twenties on sales over$200.0 million through November 2016. In February 2016, the Company amended the agreement with Sanofi and Titan to remove Titan as the entity throughwhich royalty payments from the Company are directed to Sanofi following the expiration of the new chemical entity patent for Fanapt® in the U.S. onNovember 15, 2016. Under the amended agreement, the Company pays directly to Sanofi a fixed royalty of 3% of net sales from November 16, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2019 related to manufacturing know-how. The Company made a $2.0 million payment during the year ended December 31, 2016 that appliedto this 3% manufacturing know-how royalty. No further royalties on manufacturing know-how are payable by the Company after December 31, 2019. Thisamended agreement did not alter Titan’s obligation under the license agreement to make royalty payments to Sanofi prior to November 16, 2016 or theCompany’s obligations to pay Sanofi a fixed royalty on Fanapt® net sales equal up to 6% on Sanofi know-how not related to manufacturing under certainconditions for a period of up to 10 years in markets where the new chemical entity patent has expired or was not issued.Tradipitant. In April 2012, the Company entered into a license agreement with Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) pursuant to which the Companyacquired an exclusive worldwide license under certain patents and patent applications, and other licenses to intellectual property, to develop andcommercialize an NK-1R antagonist, tradipitant, for all human indications. The patent describing tradipitant as a new chemical entity expires in April 2023,except in the U.S., where it expires in June 2024 absent any applicable patent term adjustments. Lilly is eligible to receive future payments based uponachievement of specified development and 79 Table of Contentscommercialization milestones as well as tiered-royalties on net sales at percentage rates up to the low double digits. These milestones include $4.0 million forpre-NDA approval milestones and up to $95.0 million for future regulatory approval and sales milestones. The $4.0 million of pre-NDA approval milestonesincludes $2.0 million due upon enrollment of the first subject into a Phase III study for tradipitant and $2.0 million due upon the filing of the first marketingauthorization for tradipitant in either the U.S. or the E.U. The likelihood of achieving the enrollment of the first subject into a Phase III study for tradipitantwas determined to be probable during 2017. As a result, the future obligation of $2.0 million tied to such milestone was recorded as research anddevelopment expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 and a current liability in the consolidated balancesheet as of December 31, 2017. The Company is obligated to use its commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize tradipitant.VQW-765 (formerly AQW-051). In connection with a settlement agreement with Novartis relating to Fanapt®, the Company received an exclusiveworldwide license under certain patents and patent applications, and other licenses to intellectual property, to develop and commercialize VQW-765, a PhaseII alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist. Pursuant to the license agreement, the Company is obligated to use its commercially reasonableefforts to develop and commercialize VQW-765 and is responsible for all development costs. The Company has no milestone obligations; however, Novartisis eligible to receive tiered-royalties on net sales at percentage rates up to the mid-teens.Portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitors. In March 2017, the Company entered into a license agreement with the University of California SanFrancisco (UCSF), under which Vanda acquired an exclusive worldwide license to develop and commercialize a portfolio of CFTR activators and inhibitors.Pursuant to the license agreement, the Company will develop and commercialize the CFTR activators and inhibitors and is responsible for all developmentcosts under the license agreement, including current pre-investigational new drug development work. The license agreement provides for an initial licensefee of $1.0 million that was paid by the Company in the first quarter of 2017, annual maintenance fees and up to $46.0 million in potential regulatory andsales milestone obligations. UCSF is eligible to receive single-digit tiered royalties on net sales.Research and Development and Marketing AgreementsIn the course of its business, the Company regularly enters into agreements with clinical organizations to provide services relating to clinicaldevelopment and clinical manufacturing activities under fee service arrangements. The Company’s current agreements for clinical services may be terminatedon generally 60 days’ notice without incurring additional charges, other than charges for work completed but not paid for through the effective date oftermination and other costs incurred by the Company’s contractors in closing out work in progress as of the effective date of termination.12. Income TaxesThe Company recorded total tax expense of $0.1 million on consolidated pretax loss of $15.4 million, consisting of $15.7 million of pretax loss in theU.S. and $0.3 million of pretax income from foreign subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded total tax expense of$0.1 million on consolidated pretax loss of $17.9 million, consisting of $18.1 million of pretax loss in the U.S. and $0.2 million of pretax income fromforeign subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2016. The following is a summary of the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years endedDecember 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Current: Federal $ — $— $ — State 65 66 — Foreign (66) 142 Deferred: Federal — — — State — — Foreign 137 (104) — Provision for income taxes $136 $104 $— Deferred tax assets are reduce by a tax valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all ofthe deferred tax assets will not be realized. The fact that the Company has historically generated pretax losses in the U.S. serves as strong evidence that it ismore likely than not that deferred tax assets in the U.S. will not be realized in the future. Therefore, the Company had a full tax valuation allowance againstall deferred tax assets in the U.S. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. As a result of the tax valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in the U.S., therewas no benefit for income taxes associated with the loss before income taxes for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The following isreconciliation between the federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: 80 Table of Contents Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Federal tax at statutory rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% State taxes 1.7% 0.8% -0.1% The U.S. Tax Cuts and Job Act (1) -262.6% 0.0% 0.0% Change in valuation allowance - U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 262.6% 0.0% 0.0% Other change in valuation allowance -47.8% -38.4% -25.4% Research and development credit 9.0% 3.8% 1.5% Orphan drug credit 6.3% 7.6% 1.6% Section 162(m) limitation 8.1% 0.0% -5.7% Other tax rate changes -2.6% 3.9% -0.3% Change in state NOLs 5.1% 0.0% -1.4% Stock-based compensation -13.0% -12.5% -5.1% Other items -2.7% -0.8% -0.1% Effective tax rate -0.9% -0.6% 0.0% (1)The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes the estimate of the effect of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which primarilyrelates to the remeasurement of existing deferred taxes as a result of the change to the U.S. federal tax rate.The following is a summary of the components of the Company’s deferred tax assets, net, and the related tax valuation allowance as of December 31,2017 and 2016: December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Deferred tax assets: Net operating loss carryforwards $59,222 $84,177 Stock-based compensation 5,383 12,443 Accrued and deferred expenses 1,967 2,558 Research and development and orphan drug credit carryforwards 43,976 41,104 Intangible assets 3,745 5,477 Other 2,174 1,019 Total deferred tax assets 116,467 146,778 Deferred tax liabilities: Other (386) (666) Total deferred tax liabilities (386) (666) Deferred tax assets, net 116,081 146,112 Valuation allowance 116,110 146,012 Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $(29) $100 The Company’s net deferred tax liability of less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2017 is included as a component of other non-current liabilities.The Company’s net deferred tax asset of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2016 is included as a component of non-current inventory and other in theconsolidated balance sheet.The following is a summary of changes in the Company’s tax valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: Balance at Balance at Beginning End of (in thousands) of Year Additions Reductions Year Year Ended: December 31, 2017 $146,012 $12,403 $(42,305) $116,110 December 31, 2016 139,037 11,031 (4,056) 146,012 December 31, 2015 128,890 17,002 (6,855) 139,037 The Company has net operating loss (NOL) and other tax credit carryforwards in several jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has$49 million of deferred tax assets relating to U.S. federal NOL carryforwards, along with deferred tax assets of $9 million and $35 million related to U.S.federal research and development credits and orphan drug credits, respectively. These tax attributes will begin to expire in 2028, 2024 and 2030,respectively. In addition, the Company has $10 million of deferred tax assets relating to U.S. state NOL carryforwards, which primarily relate to the District ofColumbia. State NOLs for the District of Columbia will begin to expire in 2031 and other state NOLs will begin to expire in 2018. A valuation allowance isrecorded against these U.S. federal and U.S. state deferred tax assets. 81 Table of ContentsBecause the Company has generated NOLs from inception through December, 31, 2017, all income tax returns filed by the Company are open toexamination by tax jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s income tax returns had not been under examination by any federal or state taxjurisdictions. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no uncertain tax positions.Certain tax attributes of the Company, including NOLs and credits, would be subject to a limitation should an ownership change as defined under theInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), Section 382, occur. The limitations resulting from a change in ownership could affect the Company’sability to utilize its NOLs and credit carryforward (tax attributes). Ownership changes occurred in the years ending December 31, 2014 and December 31,2008. The Company believes that the ownership changes in 2014 and 2008 will not impact its ability to utilize NOL and credit carryforwards; however,future ownership changes may cause the Company’s existing tax attributes to have additional limitations. Because the Company maintains a valuationallowance on its U.S. tax attributes, any limitation as a result of application of IRC Section 382 limitation would not have a material impact on theCompany’s provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017.The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was enacted in December 2017. The TCJA reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requirescompanies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously deferred and creates new taxes on certain foreignsourced earnings. At December 31, 2017, the Company has not completed our accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA. Certain U.S. federal deferred taxassets and liabilities were remeasured based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. However, the Company isstill analyzing certain aspects of the U.S. international and executive compensation provisions of the TCJA and refining our calculations, which couldpotentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. Because the Company has recorded a valuationallowance against deferred tax assets in the U.S., future adjustments recorded as we complete our analysis will not have a material impact to our net deferredtax asset or liability.13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)The accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and2016: December 31, December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 Foreign currency translation $29 $(1) Available-for-sale securities (63) 59 $(34) $58 There were no reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.14. Equity Incentive PlansAs of December 31, 2017, there were 6,077,622 shares that were subject to outstanding options and RSUs under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (2006Plan) and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (2016 Plan, and together with the 2006 Plan, Plans). The 2006 Plan expired by its terms on April 12, 2016, and theCompany adopted the 2016 Plan. Outstanding options and RSUs under the 2006 Plan remain in effect and the terms of the 2006 Plan continue to apply, butno additional awards can be granted under the 2006 Plan. In June 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2016 Plan under which 2,000,000 sharesof common stock were reserved for issuance. In June 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the 2016 Plan pursuantto which an additional 2,700,000 shares were reserved for issuance, among other administrative changes. As a result, there are a total of 4,700,000 shares ofcommon stock reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan, 3,168,565 shares of which remained available for future grant as of December 31, 2017. 82 Table of ContentsStock OptionsThe Company has granted option awards under the Plans with service conditions (service option awards) that are subject to terms and conditionsestablished by the compensation committee of the board of directors. Service option awards have 10-year contractual terms and all service option awardsgranted prior to December 31, 2006, service option awards granted to new employees, and certain service option awards granted to existing employees vestand become exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant date with respect to the 25% of the shares subject to service option awards. The remaining 75% ofthe shares subject to the service option awards vest and become exercisable monthly in equal installments thereafter over three years. Certain service optionawards granted to existing employees after December 31, 2006 vest and become exercisable monthly in equal installments over four years. The initial serviceoption awards granted to directors upon their election vest and become exercisable in equal monthly installments over a period of four years, while thesubsequent annual service option awards granted to directors vest and become exercisable in equal monthly installments over a period of one year. Certainservice option awards to executives and directors provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control of the Company. Certain service optionawards to employees and executives provide for accelerated vesting if the respective employee’s or executive’s service is terminated by the Company for anyreason other than cause or permanent disability. As of December 31, 2017, $7.3 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested serviceoption awards are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years. No option awards are classified as a liability as of December 31,2017.The Company’s equity incentive plan, the Second Amended and Restated Management Equity Plan (2004 Plan), expired by its terms in 2014 and noadditional options will be granted under the 2004 Plan. There were no shares subject to outstanding options granted under the 2004 Plan as of December 31,2017 and 2016. The following is a summary of option activity for the 2004 Plan for the year ended December 31, 2015: 83 Table of Contents Weighted Average Weighted Average Aggregate 2004 Plan Number of Exercise Price at Remaining Term Intrinsic (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts) Shares Grant Date (Years) Value Outstanding at December 31, 2014 652,810 $1.74 0.78 $8,212 Exercised (652,810) 1.74 6,129 Outstanding at December 31, 2015 — The following is a summary of option activity for the 2006 Plan and the 2016 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015: WeightedAverage Weighted Average Aggregate 2006 and 2016 Plans Number of Exercise Price at Remaining Term Intrinsic (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts) Shares Grant Date (Years) Value Outstanding at December 31, 2014 6,227,112 $11.58 6.71 $28,523 Granted 1,056,500 11.74 Forfeited (496,854) 10.75 Expired (64,336) 25.69 Exercised (469,974) 7.02 2,594 Outstanding at December 31, 2015 6,252,448 11.87 6.16 7,498 Granted 866,011 8.43 Forfeited (392,700) 11.23 Expired (279,766) 17.38 Exercised (897,657) 8.63 4,264 Outstanding at December 31, 2016 5,548,336 11.62 5.58 32,453 Granted 643,000 14.44 Forfeited (290,729) 10.73 Expired (605,617) 29.87 Exercised (575,206) 9.13 3,140 Outstanding at December 31, 2017 4,719,784 10.03 5.63 24,421 Exercisable at December 31, 2017 3,540,804 9.35 4.73 20,715 Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017 4,589,591 9.94 5.56 24,129 The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted was $7.81, $4.53 and $6.59 per share for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and2015, respectively. Proceeds from the exercise of stock options amounted to $5.3 million, $7.8 million and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31,2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.Restricted Stock UnitsAn RSU is a stock award that entitles the holder to receive shares of the Company’s common stock as the award vests. The fair value of each RSU isbased on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The Company has granted RSUs under the Plans with service conditions (serviceRSUs) that vest in four equal annual installments provided that the employee remains employed with the Company. As of December 31, 2017, $12.1 millionof unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested service RSUs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years. No RSUsare classified as a liability as of December 31, 2017. 84 Table of ContentsThe following is a summary of RSU activity for the 2006 Plan and the 2016 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015: Number of Weighted Shares Average Underlying Grant Date RSUs RSUs Fair Value Unvested at December 31, 2014 1,025,961 $9.94 Granted 417,000 11.51 Forfeited (189,187) 10.60 Vested (231,093) 7.96 Unvested at December 31, 2015 1,022,681 10.90 Granted 657,742 8.71 Forfeited (254,329) 10.38 Vested (287,666) 9.65 Unvested at December 31, 2016 1,138,428 10.07 Granted 857,336 14.57 Forfeited (275,613) 11.41 Vested (362,313) 9.78 Unvested at December 31, 2017 1,357,838 12.72 The grant date fair value for the 362,313 shares underlying RSUs that vested during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $3.5 million. 85 Table of ContentsStock-Based Compensation ExpenseStock-based compensation expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was allocated as follows: Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Research and development $1,152 $2,087 $2,269 Selling, general and administrative 9,313 6,456 5,692 $10,465 $8,543 $7,961 The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model that uses the assumptionsnoted in the following table. Expected volatility rates are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s publicly traded common stock and otherfactors. The risk-free interest rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the expected term of the option in effect at the time of thegrant. The Company has not paid dividends to its stockholders since its inception (other than a dividend of preferred share purchase rights, which wasdeclared in September 2008) and does not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricingmodel for employee and director stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Expected dividend yield 0% 0% 0% Weighted average expected volatility 57% 57% 60% Weighted average expected term (years) 5.89 6.08 6.00 Weighted average risk-free rate 1.97% 1.37% 1.67% 15. Employee Benefit PlanThe Company has a defined contribution plan under IRC Section 401(k). This plan covers substantially all employees who meet minimum age andservice requirements and allows participants to defer a portion of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Currently, the Company matches 50 percentup to the first six percent of employee contributions. All matching contributions have been paid by the Company. The Company match vests over a four-yearperiod and amounted to $0.8 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.16. Legal MattersIn June 2014, the Company filed suit against Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (Roxane) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (DelawareDistrict Court). The suit seeks an adjudication that Roxane has infringed one or more claims of the Company’s U.S. Patent No. 8,586,610 (‘610 Patent) bysubmitting to the FDA an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for a generic version of Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the ‘610 Patent in November2027. In addition, pursuant to a settlement agreement with Novartis, the Company assumed Novartis’ patent infringement action against Roxane in theDelaware District Court. That suit alleges that Roxane has infringed one or more claims of U.S. Patent RE39198 (‘198 Patent), which is licensed exclusivelyto the Company, by filing an ANDA for a generic version of Fanapt® prior to the expiration of the ‘198 Patent in November 2016. These two cases againstRoxane were consolidated by agreement of the parties and were tried together in a five-day bench trial that concluded on March 4, 2016. On August 25,2016, the Delaware District Court ruled in favor of the Company, finding that Roxane’s ANDA product infringed the asserted claims of the ‘610 Patent andthe ‘198 Patent. The Delaware District Court ruled that the Company is entitled to a permanent injunction against Roxane enjoining Roxane from infringingthe ‘610 Patent, including the manufacture, use, sale, offer to sell, sale, distribution or importation of any generic iloperidone product described in the ‘610Patent ANDA until the expiration of the ‘610 Patent in November 2027. If the Company obtains pediatric exclusivity, the injunction against Roxane wouldbe extended until May 2028 under the Delaware District Court’s order. On September 23, 2016, Roxane filed a notice of appeal with the Federal CircuitCourt of Appeals (Federal Circuit). Roxane filed its opening appellate brief on February 7, 2017. The Company filed its responsive brief on April 19, 2017,and Roxane filed its reply brief on May 3, 2017. On July 27, 2017, Roxane, now a subsidiary of Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC (Hikma), petitioned the FederalCircuit to substitute Roxane with new defendants West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. (each of which isa subsidiary of Hikma and both of which are referred to collectively herein as West-Ward). The Company did not oppose the substitution of West-Ward forRoxane. The appeal is fully briefed, and oral argument was held on December 5, 2017. The Federal Circuit has not yet issued a decision. 86 Table of ContentsIn 2015, the Company filed six separate patent infringement lawsuits in the Delaware District Court against Roxane, Inventia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.(Inventia), Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Lupin), Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (Taro), and ApotexInc. and Apotex Corp. (collectively, the Defendants). The lawsuits each seek an adjudication that the respective Defendants infringed one or more claims ofthe ‘610 Patent and/or the Company’s U.S. Patent No. 9,138,432 (‘432 Patent) by submitting to the FDA an ANDA for a generic version of Fanapt® prior tothe expiration of the ‘610 Patent in November 2027 or the ‘432 Patent in September 2025. The Defendants have denied infringement and counterclaimed fordeclaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of the ‘610 Patent and the ‘432 Patent. Certain Defendants have since entered into agreementsresolving these lawsuits, as discussed below. The remaining parties have agreed, and the Delaware District Court has ordered, that within 14 days after anydecision on the merits in the Roxane appeal, the parties will submit to the Delaware District Court a status report and request a schedule for trial. TheCompany entered into a confidential stipulation with Inventia regarding any potential launch of Inventia’s generic ANDA product. The Company alsoentered into a confidential stipulation with Lupin regarding any potential launch of Lupin’s generic ANDA product.Lupin filed counter claims for declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of seven of the Company’s method of treatment patents that arelisted in the Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book) related to Fanapt® (such seven patents, the Method ofTreatment Patents). The Company has not sued Lupin for infringing the Method of Treatment Patents. On October 13, 2016, the Company and Lupin filed aStipulation of Dismissal in the Delaware District Court pursuant to which Lupin’s counterclaims relating to the Method of Treatment Patents were dismissedwithout prejudice in recognition of an agreement reached between the parties by which the Company would not assert those patents against Lupin absentcertain changes in Lupin’s proposed prescribing information for its iloperidone tablets.On October 24, 2016, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Taro to resolve the Company’s patent litigation against Taro regardingTaro’s ANDA seeking approval of its generic version of Fanapt® (Taro License Agreement). Under the Taro License Agreement, the Company granted Taro anon-exclusive license to manufacture and commercialize Taro’s version of Fanapt® in the U.S. effective November 2, 2027, unless prior to that date theCompany obtains pediatric exclusivity for Fanapt®, in which case, the license will be effective May 2, 2028. Taro may enter the market earlier under certainlimited circumstances. The Taro License Agreement, which is subject to review by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department ofJustice (DOJ), provides for a full settlement and release by the Company and Taro of all claims that are the subject of the litigation.On December 7, 2016, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Apotex to resolve the Company’s patent litigation against Apotexregarding Apotex’s ANDA seeking approval of its generic version of Fanapt® (Apotex License Agreement). Under the Apotex License Agreement, theCompany granted Apotex a non-exclusive license to manufacture and commercialize Apotex’s version of Fanapt® in the U.S. effective November 2, 2027,unless prior to that date the Company obtains pediatric exclusivity for Fanapt®, in which case, the license will be effective May 2, 2028. Apotex may enterthe market earlier under certain limited circumstances. The Apotex License Agreement, which is subject to review by the FTC and the DOJ, provides for a fullsettlement and release by the Company and Apotex of all claims that are the subject of the litigation.On February 26, 2016, Roxane filed suit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Ohio District Court). The suitsought a declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of the Method of Treatment Patents. The Company has not sued Roxane for infringing theMethod of Treatment Patents. The Company filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction or to transfer the lawsuit to the DelawareDistrict Court. On December 20, 2016, the Ohio District Court ruled in the Company’s favor, dismissing Roxane’s suit without prejudice for lack of personaljurisdiction.On February 26, 2016, Roxane filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) of the ‘432 Patent with the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB) of theU.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The Company filed a Preliminary Response on June 7, 2016, and on August 30, 2016 the PTAB denied the request byRoxane to institute an IPR of the ‘432 Patent. On September 29, 2016, Roxane filed a Petition for Rehearing with the PTAB, and on October 13, 2016 theCompany filed a Response to Roxane’s Petition. On November 4, 2016, the PTAB denied Roxane’s Petition for Rehearing. 87 Table of Contents17. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)The following is a summary of quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: First Second Third Fourth (in thousands, except for per share amounts) Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year Ended December 31, 2017 Revenues $37,415 $42,056 $41,336 $44,276 Gross profit (1) 32,958 37,095 36,379 39,053 Loss from operations (7,906) (1,924) (4,923) (2,150) Net loss (7,645) (1,534) (4,550) (1,838) Net loss per share, basic and diluted $(0.17) $(0.03) $(0.10) $(0.04) Year Ended December 31, 2016 Revenues $33,262 $36,029 $38,482 $38,244 Gross profit (1) 24,363 26,593 28,549 30,867 Loss from operations (12,475) (4,789) (653) (654) Net loss (12,358) (4,618) (430) (604) Net loss per share, basic and diluted $(0.29) $(0.11) $(0.01) $(0.01) (1)Gross profit includes revenues less cost of goods sold, excluding amortization, and less intangible asset amortization. 88 Table of ContentsVANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.EXHIBIT INDEX ExhibitNumber Description3.1 Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.8 to Amendment No. 2 to the registrant’sregistration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-130759) on March 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).3.2 Form of Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.10 to the registrant’s current report onForm 8-K (File No. 001-34186) on September 25, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).3.3 Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the registrant, as amended and restated on December 17, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’scurrent report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34186) on December 21, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).4.1 Specimen certificate representing the common stock of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Amendment No. 2 to the registrant’s registrationstatement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-130759) on March 17, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).4.2 Rights Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2008, by and between the registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, asRights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34186) on September 25, 2008 and incorporatedherein by reference).4.3 Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2009, by and between the registrant and American Stock Transfer & TrustCompany, LLC, as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34186) on December 22, 2009and incorporated herein by reference).10.1# Amended and Restated License, Development and Commercialization Agreement, dated July 24, 2005, by and between Bristol-Myers SquibbCompany and the registrant (relating to HETLIOZ®) (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the registrant’s registration Statement onForm S-1 (File No. 333-130759) on February 16, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).10.2 Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by directors and executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the registrant’s registrationstatement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-130759) on December 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).10.3† 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 2 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (FileNo. 333-130759), as filed on March 17, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference). 89 Table of ContentsExhibitNumber Description10.4† Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 16, 2008, by and between Mihael H. Polymeropoulos and the registrant (filedas Exhibit 10.34 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on August 10, 2009 and incorporated herein byreference).10.5† Employment Agreement, dated December 13, 2010, by and between James Kelly and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the registrant’sannual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 10, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).10.6† Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 16, 2010, by and between Mihael H. Polymeropoulos and theregistrant (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 10, 2011 and incorporatedherein by reference).10.7 Amended and Restated Tax Indemnity Agreement, dated December 16, 2010, by and between Mihael H. Polymeropoulos and the registrant(filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 10, 2011 and incorporated herein byreference).10.8 Lease, effective as of July 25, 2011, by and between Square 54 Office Owner LLC and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the registrant’squarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on November 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).10.9 Amendment to Amended and Restated License, Development and Commercialization Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2010, by and betweenBristol-Myers Squibb Company and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34186) onApril 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).10.10 Amendment to Amended and Restated License, Development and Commercialization Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2012, by and betweenBristol-Myers Squibb Company and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34186) onMay 30, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).10.11# License, Development and Commercialization Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2012, by and between Eli Lilly and Company and the registrant(filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on August 3, 2012 and incorporated herein byreference).10.12 Amendment to Amended and Restated License, Development and Commercialization Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2013, by and betweenBristol-Myers Squibb Company and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34186) onApril 29, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference). 90 Table of ContentsExhibitNumber Description10.13# Manufacturing Agreement, dated January 24, 2014, by and between Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and the registrant (relating to HETLIOZ®)(filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on May 8, 2014 and incorporated herein byreference).10.14 Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated March 18, 2014, by and between Square 54 Office Owner LLC and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.54to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on May 8, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).10.15 Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release, dated December 22, 2014, by and among Novartis Pharma AG and the registrant (filed asExhibit 10.55 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 13, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).10.16# Asset Transfer Agreement, dated December 22, 2014, by and among Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis AG and the registrant (relating to Fanapt®)(filed as Exhibit 10.56 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K/A (File No. 001-34186) on June 10, 2015 and incorporated herein byreference).10.17# Sublicense Agreement, dated November 20, 1997, by and between Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharma AG (filed as Exhibit 10.30to Titan Pharmaceutical Inc.’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-42367) on December 16, 1997 and incorporated herein byreference).10.18# Amendment No. 1 to Sublicense Agreement by and between Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharma AG, dated November 30, 1998(filed as Exhibit 10.58 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 13, 2015 and incorporated herein byreference).10.19# Amendment No. 2 to Sublicense Agreement, dated April 10, 2001, by and between Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharma AG (filed asExhibit 10.59 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K/A (File No. 001-34186) on June 10, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).10.20# Amendment No. 3 to Sublicense Agreement, dated June 4, 2004, by and between Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharma AG (filed asExhibit 10.60 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 13, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).10.21 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 22, 2014, by and between Novartis AG and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.61 to the registrant’sannual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 13, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference). 91 Table of ContentsExhibitNumber Description10.22# License Agreement, dated December 22, 2014, by and between Novartis Pharma AG and the registrant (relating to AQW051) (filed as Exhibit10.62 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on March 13, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).10.23† Employment Agreement, dated September 3, 2015, by and between Gian Piero Reverberi, Senior Vice President and General Manager Europe,and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.64 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on November 4, 2015 andincorporated herein by reference).10.24† Employment Agreement, dated September 14, 2015, by and between Richard L. Gulino, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary,and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.65 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on November 4, 2015 andincorporated herein by reference).10.25 Agreement, dated February 2, 2016, by and among Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aventisub LLC, the successor-in-interest to Aventisub II Inc.Sanofi-Aventis and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34186) on February 4, 2016and incorporated herein by reference).10.26† Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, effective as of June 15, 2017 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to theregistrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-218774) on June 15, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).10.27† Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement under Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit10.2 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-218774) on June 15, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).10.28† Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to theregistrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-218774) on June 15, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).10.29† UK Sub Plan under the Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s registration statement onForm S-8 (File No. 333-218774) on June 15, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).10.30† Form of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement under the UK Sub Plan under the Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Plan(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-218774) on June 15, 2017 and incorporated herein byreference).10.31† Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the UK Sub Plan under the Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (filed asExhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-218774) on June 15, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference). 92 Table of ContentsExhibitNumber Description10.32# Manufacturing Agreement, dated May 6, 2016, by and between Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and the registrant (relating to Fanapt®) (filed asExhibit 10.42 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on July 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).10.33 Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated June 20, 2016, by and between Square 54 Office Owner LLC and the registrant (filed as Exhibit10.43 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on July 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).10.34 Sublease Agreement, dated June 22, 2016, by and between Hunton & Williams LLP and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the registrant’squarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34186) on July 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).10.35# License Agreement, dated October 24, 2016, by and among Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Taro Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and theregistrant (filed as Exhibit 10.45 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on February 17, 2017 and incorporatedherein by reference).10.36# License Agreement, dated December 7, 2016, by and between Apotex, Inc. and the registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the registrant’s annualreport on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on February 17, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).10.37†* Employment Agreement, dated June 12, 2009, by and between Gunther Birznieks and the registrant.21.1* List of Subsidiaries (filed as Exhibit 21.1 to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34186) on February 17, 2017 andincorporated herein by reference).23.1* Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.31.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2* Certification of the Chief Financial Officer as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.101* The following financial information from this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL(eXtensible Business Reporting Language) and furnished electronically herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and2016; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; (iii) Consolidated Statements ofComprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes inStockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years endedDecember 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. †Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.#Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain provisions of this exhibit.*Filed herewith. 93 Exhibit 10.37VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTThis Employment Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of June 12, 2009, by and between GUNTHER BIRZNIEKS (the “Employee”)and VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).1. Duties and Scope of Employment.(a) Position. For the term of his employment under this Agreement (“Employment”), the Company agrees to employ the Employee in theposition of Vice President, Therapeutic Area. The Employee shall be subject to the supervision of, and shall have such authority as is delegated to him by, theCompany’s Chief Executive Officer. The Employee hereby accepts such employment and agrees to undertake the duties and responsibilities normallyinherent in such position and such other duties and responsibilities as the Board shall from time to time reasonably assign to him.(b) Obligations to the Company. During the term of his Employment, the Employee shall devote his full business efforts and time to theCompany. During the term of his Employment, without the prior written approval of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”), the Employee shall notrender services in any capacity to any other person or entity and shall not act as a sole proprietor or partner of any other person or entity or as a shareholderowning more than five percent of the stock of any other corporation. The Employee shall comply with the Company’s policies and rules, as they may be ineffect from time to time during the term of his Employment.(c) No Conflicting Obligations. The Employee represents and warrants to the Company that he is under no obligations or commitments,whether contractual or otherwise, that are inconsistent with his obligations under this Agreement. The Employee represents and warrants that he will not useor disclose, in connection with his Employment, any trade secrets or other proprietary information or intellectual property in which the Employee or anyother person has any right, title or interest and that his Employment as contemplated by this Agreement will not infringe or violate the rights of any otherperson or entity. The Employee represents and warrants to the Company that he has returned all property and confidential information belonging to any prioremployers.2. Cash and Incentive Compensation.(a) Salary. The Company shall pay the Employee as compensation for his services a base salary at a gross annual rate of not less than$156,000. Such salary shall be payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll procedures. (The annual compensation specified in thisSubsection (a), together with any increases in such compensation that the Company may grant from time to time, is referred to in this Agreement as “BaseCompensation.”) (b) Incentive Bonuses. The Employee shall be eligible to be considered for an annual incentive bonus with a target amount equal to 15%of his Base Compensation (the “Annual Target Bonus”). Such bonus (if any) shall be awarded based on objective or subjective criteria established in advanceby the Board. The determinations of the Board with respect to such bonus shall be final and binding. Any incentive bonus for a fiscal year shall in no eventbe paid later than 2 1⁄2 months after the close of such fiscal year. Except as provided in Section 6, the Employee shall not be entitled to an incentive bonus ifhe is not employed by the Company on the date when such bonus is payable.3. Vacation and Employee Benefits. During the term of his Employment, the Employee shall be eligible for 20 paid vacation days each year inaccordance with the Company’s standard policy for similarly situated employees, as it may be amended from time to time. During the term of hisEmployment, the Employee shall be eligible to participate in any employee benefit plans maintained by the Company for similarly situated employees,subject in each case to the generally applicable terms and conditions of the plan in question and to the determinations of any person or committeeadministering such plan.4. Business Expenses. During the term of his Employment, the Employee shall be authorized to incur necessary and reasonable travel,entertainment and other business expenses in connection with his duties hereunder. The Company shall reimburse the Employee for such expenses uponpresentation of an itemized account and appropriate supporting documentation, all in accordance with the Company’s generally applicable policies. Anyreimbursement shall (a) be paid promptly but not later than the last day of the calendar year following the year in which the expense was incurred, (b) not beaffected by any other expenses that are eligible for reimbursement in any calendar year and (c) not be subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.5. Term of Employment.(a) Basic Rule. The Company agrees to continue the Employee’s Employment, and the Employee agrees to remain in Employment withthe Company, from the date of this Agreement until the date when the Employee’s Employment terminates pursuant to Subsection (b) or (c) below. TheEmployee’s Employment with the Company shall be “at will,” meaning that either the Employee or the Company may terminate the Employee’sEmployment at any time, with or without Cause. Any contrary representations which may have been made to the Employee shall be superseded by thisAgreement. This Agreement shall constitute the full and complete agreement between the Employee and the Company on the “at will” nature of theEmployee’s Employment, which may only be changed in an express written agreement signed by the Employee and a duly authorized officer of theCompany (other than the Employee).(b) Termination. The Company may terminate the Employee’s Employment at any time and for any reason (or no reason), and with orwithout Cause, by giving the Employee notice in writing. The Employee may terminate his Employment by giving the Company 14 days’ advance notice inwriting. The Employee’s Employment shall terminate automatically in the event of his death. 2 (c) Permanent Disability. The Company may terminate the Employee’s Employment due to Permanent Disability by giving theEmployee 30 days’ advance notice in writing. In the event that the Employee satisfactorily resumes the performance of substantially all of his dutieshereunder before the termination of his Employment under this Subsection (c) becomes effective, the notice of termination shall automatically be deemed tohave been revoked.(d) Rights Upon Termination. Except as expressly provided in Section 6, upon the termination of the Employee’s Employment pursuantto this Section 5, the Employee shall only be entitled to the compensation, benefits and reimbursements described in Sections 2, 3 and 4 for the periodpreceding the effective date of the termination. The payments under this Agreement shall fully discharge all responsibilities of the Company to theEmployee.(e) Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate when all obligations of the parties hereunder have been satisfied. Thetermination of this Agreement shall not limit or otherwise affect any of the Employee’s obligations under Section 7.6. Termination Benefits.(a) General Release. Any other provision of this Agreement notwithstanding, Subsections (b), (c) and (d) below shall not apply unlessthe Employee has executed a general release of all claims that he may then have against the Company or persons affiliated with the Company. The releaseshall be in a form prescribed by the Company, without alterations. The Employee shall execute and return the release on or before the date specified by theCompany in the prescribed form (the “Release Deadline”). The Release Deadline shall in no event be later than 60 days after the Employee’s Separation. Ifthe Employee fails to return the release on or before the Release Deadline, or if the Employee revokes the release, then the Employee shall not be entitled tothe benefits described in this Section 6.(b) Severance Pay. If, during the term of this Agreement, a Separation occurs because the Company terminates the Employee’sEmployment for any reason other than Cause or Permanent Disability, or because the Employee terminates his Employment within six months after acondition constituting Good Reason arises, then the Company shall pay the Employee both of the following:(i) Base Compensation. His Base Compensation for a period of six months following the Separation (the “Continuation Period”).Such Base Compensation shall be paid at the rate in effect at the time of the Separation and in accordance with the Company’s standard payrollprocedures. The salary continuation payments shall commence within 30 days after the Release Deadline and, once they commence, shall beretroactive to the date of the Employee’s Separation.(ii) Target Bonus. A bonus in an amount equal to a pro-rata portion of the Annual Target Bonus for the year during which theSeparation occurs. Such amount shall be payable in a lump sum within 30 days after the Release Deadline. 3 (c) Health Insurance. If Subsection (b) above applies, and if the Employee elects to continue his health insurance coverage under theConsolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”) following the Separation, then the Company shall pay the Employee’s monthly premiumunder COBRA until the earliest of (i)the close of the Continuation Period, (ii) the expiration of the Employee’s continuation coverage under COBRA and(iii) the date when the Employee is offered substantially equivalent health insurance coverage in connection with new employment or self-employment.(d) Options. If, during the term of this Agreement, a Separation occurs because the Company terminates the Employee’s Employment forany reason other than Cause or Permanent Disability, then (i) the vested portion of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to all options held bythe Employee at the time of his Separation shall be determined by adding three months to the actual period of service that he has completed with theCompany and (ii) such options shall be exercisable for six months after the Employee’s Separation.7. Non-Solicitation, Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition. The Employee has entered into a Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreementwith the Company, which agreement is incorporated herein by reference.8. Successors.(a) Company’s Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon any successor (whether direct or indirect and whether by purchase,lease, merger, consolidation, liquidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the Company’s business and/or assets. For all purposes under thisAgreement, the term “Company” shall include any successor to the Company’s business and/or assets which becomes bound by this Agreement.(b) Employee’s Successors. This Agreement and all rights of the Employee hereunder shall inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by,the Employee’s personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees and legatees.9. Definitions. For all purposes under this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below:“Cause” shall mean:(a) An unauthorized use or disclosure by the Employee of the Company’s confidential information or trade secrets, which use ordisclosure causes material harm to the Company;(b) A material breach by the Employee of any agreement between the Employee and the Company; 4 (c) A material failure by the Employee to comply with the Company’s written policies or rules;(d) The Employee’s conviction of, or plea of “guilty” or “no contest” to, a felony under the laws of the United States or any State thereof;(e) The Employee’s gross negligence or willful misconduct;(f) A continuing failure by the Employee to perform assigned duties after receiving written notification of such failure from the Board; or(g) A failure by the Employee to cooperate in good faith with a governmental or internal investigation of the Company or its directors,officers or employees, if the Company has requested the Employee’s cooperation.“Good Reason” shall mean (i) the Employee’s receipt of notice that his principal workplace will be relocated by more than 30 miles or(ii) a reduction in the Employee’s Base Compensation by more than 10%, unless pursuant to a Company-wide reduction affecting all employeesproportionately. A condition shall not be considered “Good Reason” unless the Employee gives the Company written notice of such condition within 90days after such condition comes into existence and the Company fails to remedy such condition within 30 days after receiving the Employee’s written notice.“Permanent Disability” shall mean that the Employee, at the time notice is given, has failed to perform his duties under this Agreementfor a period of not less than 90 consecutive days as the result of his incapacity due to physical or mental injury, disability or illness.“Separation” shall mean a “separation from service,” as defined in the regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of1986, as amended (the “Code”).10. Miscellaneous Provisions.(a) Notice. Notices and all other communications contemplated by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have beenduly given when personally delivered or when mailed by overnight courier, U.S. registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid. Inthe case of the Employee, mailed notices shall be addressed to him at the home address that he most recently communicated to the Company in writing. In thecase of the Company, mailed notices shall be addressed to its corporate headquarters, and all notices shall be directed to the attention of its Secretary.(b) Modifications and Waivers. No provision of this Agreement shall be modified, waived or discharged unless the modification, waiveror discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by the Employee and by an authorized officer of the Company (other than the Employee). No waiver by eitherparty of any breach of, or of compliance with, any condition or provision of this Agreement by the other party shall be considered a waiver of any othercondition or provision or of the same condition or provision at another time. 5 (c) Whole Agreement. No other agreements, representations or understandings (whether oral or written and whether express or implied)which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement have been made or entered into by either party with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreementand the Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. The letteragreement dated December 17, 2008, between the Employee and the Company is hereby superseded.(d) Tax Matters. All payments made under this Agreement shall be subject to reduction to reflect taxes or other charges required to bewithheld by law. For purposes of Section 409A of the Code, each periodic salary continuation payment under Section 6(b)(i) is hereby designated as aseparate payment. If the Company determines that the Employee is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code andthe regulations thereunder at the time of his Separation, then:(i) Any salary continuation payments under Section 6(b)(i), to the extent not exempt from Section 409A of the Code, shall commenceduring the seventh month after the Employee’s Separation and the installments that otherwise would have been paid during the first six monthsfollowing the Employee’s Separation shall be paid in a lump sum when such salary continuation payments commence; and(ii) Any lump sum payment under Section 6(b)(ii), to the extent not exempt from Section 409A of the Code, shall be made during theseventh month after the Employee’s Separation.The Company shall not have a duty to design its compensation policies in a manner that minimizes the Employee’s tax liabilities, and the Employee shallnot make any claim against the Company or the Board related to tax liabilities arising from the Employee’s compensation.(e) Choice of Law. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of theState of Maryland (except their provisions governing the choice of law).(f) Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall not affect the validity orenforceability of any other provision hereof, which shall remain in full force and effect.(g) Arbitration. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, or the Employee’sEmployment or the termination thereof, shall be settled in the State of Maryland, by arbitration in accordance with the National Rules for the Resolution ofEmployment Disputes of the American Arbitration Association. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties, and judgment on theaward rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The parties hereby agree that the arbitrator shall be empowered toenter an equitable decree mandating specific enforcement of the terms of this Agreement. The Company and the Employee shall share equally 6 all fees and expenses of the arbitrator. The Employee hereby consents to personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of Marylandfor any action or proceeding arising from or relating to this Agreement or relating to any arbitration in which the parties are participants.(h) No Assignment. This Agreement and all rights and obligations of the Employee hereunder are personal to the Employee and may notbe transferred or assigned by the Employee at any time. The Company may assign its rights under this Agreement to any entity that assumes the Company’sobligations hereunder in connection with any sale or transfer of all or a substantial portion of the Company’s assets to such entity.(i) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all ofwhich together shall constitute one and the same instrument.[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY] 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of thedate first written above. /s/ Gunther BirznieksGunther Birznieks VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.By /s/ Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D.Title: President/CEO 8 Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-133368, No. 333-138070, No. 333-141571,No. 333-148924, No. 333-156995, No. 333-164567, No. 333-171962, No. 333-179265, No. 333-186509, No. 333-193614, No. 333-201754,No. 333-209144, No. 333-212255 and No. 333-218774) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-205513) of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. of our report dated February 15,2018 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBaltimore, MarylandFebruary 15, 2018 EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have: a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b.Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c.Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d.Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. February 15, 2018 /s/ Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, James P. Kelly, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have: a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b.Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c.Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d.Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. February 15, 2018 /s/ James P. Kelly James P. KellyExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, theconsolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. February 15, 2018 /s/ Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D.President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)February 15, 2018 /s/ James P. Kelly James P. KellyExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above