Veritiv Annual Report 2017

← All annual reports

FY2017 Annual Report · Veritiv

Loading PDF…

V
E
R
I
T
I
V
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

2
0
1
7
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

A C C E L E R A T I N G O U R G R O W T H

2 0 1 7 A N N U A L R E P O R T

819593cov.indd 1

3/6/18 1:20 PM

OUR VISION

One team shaping success through
exceptional service, innovative people,
and consistent values.

819593cov.indd 2

3/6/18 1:20 PM

Veritiv Corporation is a Fortune 500® company
and a leading North American business-to-business
distributor of packaging, facility solutions, print
and publishing products and services, and also a
provider of logistics and supply chain management
solutions. With approximately 8,900 employees
strong, we are driven by our Values: Integrity, One
Team, People Commitment, Customer Focus,
Operational Excellence, and Passion for Results.

We put decades of industry knowledge, expertise, and
proven supply chain ingenuity to work for our customers
in a wide range of industries and a variety of businesses
– including more than half of Fortune 500® companies.
With approximately 170 distribution centers across the
U.S., Canada, and Mexico, our focus is on the success
of our customers’ businesses and their brands. Driven
by our innovative people, our values, and providing
exceptional service, helping to shape our customers’
business success is at the heart of everything we do.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

In millions, except per share

amounts, at December 31

Net Sales

Cost of Products Sold

Net Sales Less Cost of Products Sold

Net Income (Loss)

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Weighted – Average – Shares Outstanding – Basic

Weighted – Average – Shares Outstanding – Diluted

2017

2016

8,364.7

$
8,326.6

6,846.6

6,826.4

1,518.1

1,500.2

(13.3)

(0.85)

15.70

21.0

1.31

1.30

15.97

16.15

Adjusted EBITDA

176.4

192.2

1 For our Non-GAAP reconciliations see our 2017 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, starting on page 94.

VERITIV BY
THE NUMBERS

NET SALES

$8.4B
$176M

ADJUSTED EBITDA

8,900*

EMPLOYEES

170*

DISTRIBUTION
CENTERS

20M*

SQUARE FEET OF
DISTRIBUTION
CENTER SPACE

* Approximate as of December 31, 2017

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

The Veritiv team executed on what
we set out to do at the beginning
of 2017 and performed well against
many of our priorities for the year.
We did this despite difficult market
conditions, continuing structural
decline in our Print and Publishing
segments, and significant change
that continues to take place across
our company. Even with these
headwinds, we ended the year with
nearly $8.4 billion in revenue, our
first year-over-year increase since
the merger, and $176 million in
Adjusted EBITDA.

Throughout 2017, we remained
firmly committed to integration and
laying the foundation to strengthen
processes and create efficiencies
to enable accelerated growth. We
effectively completed our initial
synergy capture, and consider it a
success. We also focused on our
higher revenue growth segments,
Packaging and Facility Solutions, and
welcomed All American Containers,
a rigid packaging distributor, into the
Veritiv family. We remain committed
to growing our business, evolving
our culture, and addressing the
needs of our customers.

We expect 2018 will be another
challenging year as we look to

simplifying processes, lowering
costs, and improving overall
customer and supplier experiences.

We would not be where we are
today without our strong and
talented team of Veritiv colleagues
around the world. From the
start, we dedicated ourselves to
building a values-based culture
that promotes customer focus,
operational excellence, a passion
for results, integrity, one team,
and a commitment to our people.
Our commitment to these values
throughout our short tenure
as a public company has been
unwavering.

I am confident in Veritiv’s future
and look forward to executing our
strategy in the coming months and
years to complete the transformative
journey that will make Veritiv the
leading distribution solutions and
services provider we aspire to be.

Thank you for your continued
support of Veritiv.

Mary Laschinger
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

complete most of our remaining
integration work and transition to
the optimization element of our
invest, protect and optimize strategy.

We will continue to invest in our
higher growth and higher margin
businesses, including our Packaging
segment and services offerings. We
will continue to protect our leading
market positions and maximize
Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow
in our Facility Solutions, Print and
Publishing segments. We will begin
to optimize our entire business by

OUR VALUES

INTEGRITY
We do the right things, act with honesty and consistency,
and truthfully represent our capabilities.

CUSTOMER FOCUS
We are committed to understanding our customers’
needs and providing solutions that add value.

ONE TEAM
We collaborate as one team based on what is best
for Veritiv as a whole, and treat each other with
mutual respect.

PEOPLE COMMITMENT
We engage our employees in the organization’s success
and are committed to performance management and
talent development.

OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
We consistently execute, measure, and improve the safety,
efficiency, and quality of the work we do every single day.

PASSION FOR RESULTS
We are passionate about winning and our desire to meet
financial, operational, and people commitments in the
right way.

PACKAGING

Veritiv works directly with customers to identify and
implement packaging solutions that deliver in both form
and function. Our packaging specialists are experts
at discovering untapped efficiencies in designing,
sourcing, and delivering standard and custom
packaging processes for customers across a range
of industries − including consumer packaged goods,
fulfillment, food processing, retail, and manufacturing.

Veritiv packaging solutions are not restricted to one
particular substrate − we evaluate every project with
a material-neutral approach. We have long-standing
relationships with box plants, sheet plants, and other
international material sources, providing us with access
to a wide range of material inputs.

Our packaging solutions span across food-grade
packaging, industrial packaging, point-of-sale displays,
and shipping supplies. Our exclusive TUFflexTM line of
packaging essentials delivers enduring performance,
maximum efficiency, and unmatched value.

We also sell and distribute single-function and fully
automated packaging equipment. In addition, we
offer assembly and fulfillment services, such as kitting
− which help customers manage seasonal spikes, new
market testing, and promotions.

Packaging optimization extends through our Veritiv
Packaging Design Network, where an experienced
team of designers, engineers, and marketers provide
in-house expertise for custom improvements in cost
and waste reduction, logistics, structural and graphical
integrity, and testing processes.

38%

66%

$3.2B • 38%
REVENUE1

$238M • 66%
ADJ. EBITDA1

1 Other revenue is excluded from the calculation of Revenue by Segment. Corporate and Other expenses are excluded from the calculation for percentage of Adjusted EBITDA by Segment.

FACILITY SOLUTIONS

Veritiv understands that clean, healthy, and well-
maintained environments significantly impact both
internal operations and external perceptions. Veritiv’s
Lean-certified Facility Advisors are well versed in how
our cleaning and food service products, management
programs, and analysis tools help maintain high levels
of facility excellence for our customers, helping to
propel their businesses forward.

Our private brands include Reliable Brand® commercial
cleaning solutions and Spring GroveTM food service
disposable products. Both offer a simplified approach to
help customers meet and exceed facility expectations,
increase value, and redirect surplus dollars.

FORDIS® and Saalfeld®, our redistribution businesses,
provide solutions to distributors in local markets.

We have the hands-on expertise and sourcing
capabilities to serve customers across a wide range
of industries, including:

• Office buildings
• Manufacturing
• Higher education
• Healthcare
• Government
• Other high-traffic venues

16%

10%

$1.31B • 16%
REVENUE1

$35.6M • 10%
ADJ. EBITDA1

1 Other revenue is excluded from the calculation of Revenue by Segment. Corporate and Other expenses are excluded from the calculation for percentage of Adjusted EBITDA by Segment.

We leverage our global supplier network, as well as our
expertise and advanced technology, to deliver the most
comprehensive and diverse solutions to our customers.
Our experience and unique offerings in logistics and
supply chain efficiency, new revenue generation, service
excellence, chain of custody and sustainable sourcing,
custom converting, and customized reporting are all
aimed to help our customers reach their goals. Our
distribution centers are stocked with a comprehensive
print solutions inventory to serve the commercial,
digital, wide format, and graphic communications
markets.

The print products we sell and distribute are used
by commercial printers, data centers, in-plant print
facilities, package and flexographic printers, print
design agencies, specialty graphic imaging printers,
and others. These customers use Veritiv products in
a range of communications, including advertising

Veritiv’s paper and print private
brands include:
• Comet™ Multipurpose
• Econosource®
• Endurance®
• Galaxy™
• Starbrite® Opaque Select

• nordic+®
• Seville™
• Showcase™

supplements, annual reports, billboards, brochures,
business forms, catalogs, retail circulars, retail visuals,
and vinyl offerings. We serve our smaller customers in
the U.S. through our Veritiv Express branches, which
supply business imaging paper, printing paper, and
packaging products available for immediate pickup or
quick delivery. Veritiv maintains a proven private brand
portfolio of coated, uncoated, digital and office papers,
board and envelope portfolios, and specialty product
lines, such as pressure-sensitive labels and pressroom
supplies.

33%

17%

$2.8B • 33%
REVENUE1

$60.8M • 17%
ADJ. EBITDA1

1 Other revenue is excluded from the calculation of Revenue by Segment. Corporate and Other expenses are excluded from the calculation for percentage of Adjusted EBITDA by Segment.

PUBLISHING AND PRINT MANAGEMENT

Through Veritiv’s two complementary publishing and
print management businesses, Bulkley Dunton and
Graphic Communications, our specialists provide
customized solutions that offer retailers, publishers,
catalogers, direct mail companies, grocers, corporate
enterprise businesses, and printers the greatest return
on their media and print programs.

By differentiating paper purchasing from printing, Veritiv
is able to leverage our sophisticated and expansive
supply chain to ensure consistent and predictable costs,
quality, and paper availability for customers of all sizes.
Additionally, Veritiv is now able to analyze our clients’
complete media requirements to complement their
print and paper programs. With a client base ranging
from Fortune 500® companies to small local businesses,
our industry consultants are experts at scaling solutions
to shield clients from market volatility while maintaining
their brand requirements and appropriate certifications.

Our paper and print consultants match customers’
unique needs with cutting-edge marketing solutions,
leading paper mills, and printers that best meet their
standards for price, paper quality, production, and
environmental sustainability, including Chain of Custody
certification and recycled papers.

12%

$1B • 12%
REVENUE1

$26.4M • 7%
ADJ. EBITDA1

1 Other revenue is excluded from the calculation of Revenue by Segment. Corporate and Other expenses are excluded from the calculation for percentage of Adjusted EBITDA by Segment.

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

As a leading business-to-business
distribution solutions company,
Veritiv operates in more than 250
communities across North America.
Driven by our core values and
Veritiv Connects, our community
engagement and philanthropy
program, we focus our efforts on
corporate giving and employee
volunteer efforts to help shape the
success of these communities. We
are committed to playing an active
role in helping to improve the
quality of life in the communities
where we live and work, and on
having a positive impact on all of
our stakeholders in these areas
including employees, customers,
and suppliers.

PRIMARY FOCUS AREAS

Learning: We value workforce readiness
and programs that support talent
development and prepare individuals
for careers in distribution solutions
and beyond. An educated and skilled
workforce is essential for our success.

Healthy Living: Prosperous, healthy, and
sustainable communities are important
to Veritiv, to our customers, and to
society. We deliver support where we
can make the biggest difference.

In support of these primary focus
areas, Veritiv is proud to continue our
partnerships with Junior Achievement
and the American Red Cross, providing
in-kind donations, monetary support,
and Veritiv volunteer teams.

Junior Achievement – Veritiv partners
with Junior Achievement to provide
students with the knowledge and skills

they need to plan for their futures,
and to make smart academic and
economic choices. Teams of Veritiv
employees regularly volunteer at the
Junior Achievement Discovery Center
that provides a learning experience to
engage students and open their eyes
to life beyond the classroom. Students
apply business and personal finance
concepts they discover in the classroom
on real-world scenarios through a hands-
on, learning experience.

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY CONTINUED

American Red Cross – Veritiv and our
employees made significant monetary
contributions to support relief efforts
in the aftermath of Hurricanes Harvey,
Irma, and Maria, as well as the California
wildfires and the Mexico earthquake.
In addition, Veritiv donated much
needed cleaning supplies, including
gloves, mops, and totes to further aid in
hurricane clean-up efforts.

OTHER FOCUS AREAS

• Disaster Preparedness, Response,
and Resiliency – We can make the
most important contribution utilizing
our distribution network to aid in
relief efforts and assist families,
communities, and businesses as they
work to rebuild.

• Veterans – We want to help the

women and men who have served our
country successfully re-enter civilian
life and give them an opportunity to
seek employment at Veritiv and other
companies.

• Clean Communities – As a distributor
of a variety of products, we support
efforts to preserve, replenish, and
enhance the environment for future
generations.

• Local Education Programs – This

focus area is built on our belief that a
good education for all is essential in
advancing society, strengthening our
communities, and supporting a strong
talent pipeline.

SUPPORTING LOCAL
COMMUNITIES

• Supporting our healthy living

focus area, employees at Veritiv’s
Jacksonville campus saw a need and
answered the call. Many food pantries
enter the year with depleted supplies
following the holidays. Through a
partnership with Feeding Northeast
Florida, the Jacksonville team held a
can drive to help with replenishment
and collected more than 400 pounds
of food – enough to serve 341 meals
to families in local communities.

• Toys for Tots - Veritiv supported the
U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Toys for
Tots program at five locations across
Metro Atlanta this holiday season.
Employees collected 400 toys for
children in need across the Atlanta
community.

• Employees across Canada donated
an assortment of coats, snow pants,
hats, scarves, gloves, and hoodies to
One Warm Coat, a national non-profit
organization that works to provide
a free, warm coat to any person in
need to help them through the winter
months.

ONE VERITIV FUND:
EMPLOYEES HELPING
EMPLOYEES

Funded by employee contributions,
the One Veritiv Fund provides
short-term financial relief to eligible
Veritiv employees who have suffered
significant hardship as a result of
unforeseen events such as natural
disaster, medical emergency, or
military deployment.

• Hands On Atlanta Day – Employees
in Atlanta joined more than 3,000
volunteers across the city on this day
dedicated to serving Metro Atlanta
communities, schools, and nonprofit
organizations. Veritiv employees
tackled two projects: cleaning and
packaging eyeglasses for distribution
to low-income individuals, and
helping to create a rigorous learning
environment by painting murals at a
local school.

• Love Rolls – As one of the largest

facility supplies distributors in the U.S.
and in recognition of National Toilet
Paper Day, Veritiv donated 25,000 rolls
of toilet paper to Love Rolls, Inc., a
charity dedicated to providing toilet
paper to homeless communities across
the country.

• A number of Veritiv employees

participated in projects for Make
a Difference Day, an annual event
where tens of thousands of volunteers
across the U.S. aim to improve the
lives of others through a wide range
of community-driven service projects.
Projects included building homes for
disabled veterans, supporting local
animal shelters, and collecting food
and clothing.

SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT

SAFETY

At Veritiv, we are committed to providing all team
members with a safe and productive workplace, and
continuing to refine our culture of proactive safety.
Our Target Zero approach symbolizes our goal of zero
unrecognized and unresolved hazards that can lead to
injuries. We strive to achieve that goal each and every
day. Through Target Zero, we empower and engage
all Veritiv employees in proactive identification of
workplace hazards and the development of practical
solutions integrated with business operations.

In 2017, our Total Incident Rate (TIR) for our operations
in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico was 1.2611.

Block Hazards. Drive Awareness.

SCORE a Safe Workplace.

We introduced SCORE (Stop, Consider,
Observe, React, and Execute safely) in 2017 as
a new safety initiative that facilitates a simple
communication to workers about how to
approach daily tasks safely, regardless of how
routine the task may be.

1 Total Incident Rate (TIR) is calculated using the OSHA criteria for recordability and OSHA calculation methodologies. Total Incident Rate = Total Recordable Injuries X 200,000/Total Hours

Worked. The 200,000 hours in the formula represent the equivalent of 100 employees working 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year and provides the standard base for the incident rate.

SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT CONTINUED

ENVIRONMENT

As a leading North American distribution company, we
recognize that our businesses have an impact on the
environment. We focus our environmental sustainability
efforts in three areas: our fleet, our facilities, and our
products.

Fleet – As a distribution company, the majority of our
business involves moving products by road. There are
significant opportunities to reduce our environmental
impact by improving resource efficiency across our fleet
and delivery network.

Veritiv is a member of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s SmartWay Transport Partnership, which helps
businesses reduce transportation-related emissions
through advanced fuel-efficient technologies and
operational practices. Route and delivery optimization
software helps Veritiv drivers make deliveries using the
most efficient routes, minimizing fuel use and emissions.
We are also in the process of replacing some of our
older vehicles with approximately 250 new units that
offer improved fuel economy.

Facilities – Veritiv takes a strategic approach to
reducing our buildings’ impact on the environment. We
aim to improve energy efficiency across our operations
through retrofit projects and use of efficient equipment
and technologies.

Products – Veritiv is committed to advancing and
improving our offerings of environmentally sustainable
products, both in our private brands and name-brand
product lines, across our Print, Packaging, and Facility
Solutions segments. We offer a range of products that
meet widely acknowledged environmental standards.

Veritiv Private Label Brands – Our proprietary brands
adhere to the highest standards. Several of Veritiv’s
private label paper brands hold Chain of Custody
certification, including Endurance® Printing Paper and
Starbrite® Opaque Select. Our Reliable Brand® towel
and tissue line is made from recycled content and
meets Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
LEED® standards.

• Packaging – Through our network of Packaging Design

Centers, Veritiv employees research, design, and
develop cost-effective packaging solutions that minimize
environmental impacts.

• Facility Solutions – Veritiv’s Green Gauge™ analysis tool
enables customers to quickly quantify product usage and
sustainable cleaning purchases against LEED standards for
their entire facility network, and seamlessly report on it for
certifications and communications.

• Print – We maintain three Chain of Custody certifications

for our print and publishing businesses: Forest Stewardship
Council®, Sustainable Forestry Initiative®, and Programme
for the Endorsement of Forest Certification®. In 2017, Veritiv
sold more than 1.5 million tons of Chain of Custody-certified
commercial printing and imaging papers.

MANAGEMENT TEAM

MARY A.
LASCHINGER
Chairman of the Board
and Chief
Executive Officer

STEPHEN J.
SMITH
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

THOMAS S.
LAZZARO
Senior Vice President,
Field Sales and
Operations

JOHN G.
BISCANTI
Group Vice President,
Publishing and Print
Management

CHARLES B.
HENRY
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Services

MARK W.
HIANIK
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary

BARRY R.
NELSON
Senior Vice President,

Facility Solutions

ELIZABETH A.
PATRICK
Senior Vice President
and Chief Human
Resources Officer

TRACY L.
PEARSON
Senior Vice President,
Packaging

DANIEL J.
WATKOSKE
Senior Vice President,
Print and Veritiv Services

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MARY A.
LASCHINGER
Chairman of the Board
and Chief
Executive Officer

WILLIAM E.
MITCHELL
Presiding Director,
Managing Partner of Sequel
Capital Management, LLC

DAVID E.
FLITMAN1
Executive Vice President of
Performance Food Group
Company

DANIEL T.
HENRY 1*, 2
Retired Chief Financial Officer
and Executive Vice President of
American Express Company

LIZA K.
LANDSMAN3
President and Chief
Customer Officer of
Jet.com

Board Committees:

1– Audit and Finance

2– Compensation
and Leadership
Development

3– Nominating and
Governance

*– Denotes

Committee Chair

TRACY A.
LEINBACH 2, 3*
Retired Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer of Ryder
System, Inc.

MICHAEL P.
MULDOWNEY 1, 2
Chief Financial Officer of
Gordon Brothers Group

CHARLES G.
WARD, III 1, 3
Retired Partner of Perella
Weinberg Partners

JOHN J.
ZILLMER 2*, 3
Retired Executive
Chairman of Univar Inc.

819593nar.indd 16

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to _________
Commission file number 001-36479

VERITIV CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
1000 Abernathy Road NE
Building 400, Suite 1700
Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal executive offices)

46-3234977
(I.R.S Employer Identification Number)

30328
(Zip Code)

(770) 391-8200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common stock, $0.01 par value

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting
company", and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Emerging growth company

(do not check if a small reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Accelerated filer

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes

As of June 30, 2017, the aggregate market value of the voting common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant,
based on the closing sale price of those shares on the New York Stock Exchange reported on June 30, 2017, was $511,432,245. For
the purposes of this disclosure only, the registrant has assumed that its directors and executive officers (as defined in Rule 3b-7 under
the Exchange Act) and the UWW Holdings, LLC stockholder are the affiliates of the registrant.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock as of February 23, 2018 was 15,733,745.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Part I
Item 1.

Business

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 2.

Item 3.

Item 4.

Part II

Item 5.

Item 6.

Item 7.

Properties

Legal Proceedings

Mine Safety Disclosures

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities

Selected Financial Data

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 8.

Item 9.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

Item 9B.

Other Information

Part III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.

Part IV
Item 15.
Item 16.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Form 10-K Summary

SIGNATURES

Page

101

102
102
102
102
102

103
106

107

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

CAUTIONARY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this report regarding the Company’s future operating results, performance, business
plans, prospects, guidance and any other statements not constituting historical fact are "forward-looking statements" subject
to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Where possible, the words "believe,"
"expect," "anticipate," "continue," "intend," "should," "will," "would," "planned," "estimated," "potential," "goal," "outlook,"
"may," "predicts," "could," or the negative of such terms, or other comparable expressions, as they relate to the Company or
its business, have been used to identify such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements reflect only the
Company’s current beliefs and assumptions with respect to future operating results, performance, business plans, prospects,
guidance and other matters, and are based on information currently available to the Company. Accordingly, the statements
are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and contingencies, which could cause the Company’s actual operating results,
performance, business plans or prospects to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include risks and other factors

described under "Risk Factors" in this report and elsewhere in the Company’s publicly available reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which contain a discussion of various factors that may affect the Company’s
business or financial results. Such risks and other factors, which in some instances are beyond the Company’s control,
include: the industry-wide decline in demand for paper and related products; increased competition from existing and non-
traditional sources; adverse developments in general business and economic conditions as well as conditions in the global
capital and credit markets; foreign currency fluctuations; our ability to attract, train and retain highly qualified employees;
the effects of work stoppages, union negotiations and labor disputes; the loss of any of our significant customers; changes in
business conditions in our international operations; procurement and other risks in obtaining packaging, paper and facility
products from our suppliers for resale to our customers; changes in prices for raw materials; fuel cost increases; inclement
weather, anti-terrorism measures and other disruptions to the transportation network; our dependence on a variety of IT and
telecommunications systems and the Internet; our reliance on third-party vendors for various services; cyber-security risks;
costs to comply with laws, rules and regulations, including environmental, health and safety laws, and to satisfy any liability
or obligation imposed under such laws; regulatory changes and judicial rulings impacting our business; adverse results from
litigation, governmental investigations or audits, or tax-related proceedings or audits; our inability to renew existing leases
on acceptable terms, negotiate rent decreases or concessions and identify affordable real estate; our ability to adequately
protect our material intellectual property and other proprietary rights, or to defend successfully against intellectual property
infringement claims by third parties; our pension and health care costs and participation in multi-employer pension, health
and welfare plans; increasing interest rates; our ability to generate sufficient cash to service our debt; our ability to comply
with the covenants contained in our debt agreements; our ability to refinance or restructure our debt on reasonable terms and
conditions as might be necessary from time to time; changes in accounting standards and methodologies; our ability to
realize the full benefit of the anticipated synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities from the merger transaction and
our ability to integrate the xpedx business with the Unisource business; the possibility of incurring expenditures in excess of
those currently budgeted in connection with the integration, and other events of which we are presently unaware or that we
currently deem immaterial that may result in unexpected adverse operating results.

For a more detailed discussion of these factors, see the information under the heading "Risk Factors" in this report

and in other filings we make with the SEC. Forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and the
Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, historical information should not be
considered as an indicator of future performance.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Our Company

Veritiv Corporation ("Veritiv" or the "Company" and sometimes referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as
"we", "our" or "us") is a leading North American business-to-business distributor of packaging, facility solutions, print and
publishing products and services. Additionally, Veritiv provides logistics and supply chain management solutions to its
customers. Veritiv was established in 2014, following the merger (the "Merger") of International Paper Company’s xpedx
distribution solutions business ("xpedx") and UWW Holdings, Inc. ("UWWH"), the parent company of Unisource

Worldwide, Inc. ("Unisource"). Independently, the two companies achieved past success by continuously upholding high
standards of efficiency and customer focus. Through leveraging this combined history of operational excellence, Veritiv
evolved into one team shaping its success through exceptional service, innovative people and consistent values. Today,
Veritiv's focus on segment-tailored market leadership in distribution and a commitment to operational excellence allows it to
partner with world class suppliers, add value through multiple capabilities and deliver solutions to a wide range of customer
segments.

We operate from approximately 170 distribution centers primarily throughout the U.S., Canada and Mexico, serving

customers across a broad range of industries. These customers include printers, publishers, data centers, manufacturers,
higher education institutions, healthcare facilities, sporting and performance arenas, retail stores, government agencies,
property managers and building service contractors.

Veritiv's business is organized under four reportable segments: Packaging, Facility Solutions, Print, and Publishing

and Print Management ("Publishing"). This segment structure is consistent with the way the Chief Operating Decision Maker,
who is Veritiv's Chief Executive Officer, makes operating decisions and manages the growth and profitability of the
Company's business. The Company also has a Corporate & Other category which includes certain assets and costs not
primarily attributable to any of the reportable segments, as well as our Veritiv logistics solutions business which provides
transportation and warehousing solutions. The following summary describes the products and services offered in each of the
reportable segments:

• Packaging – The Packaging segment provides standard as well as custom and comprehensive packaging solutions

for customers based in North America and in key global markets. The business is strategically focused on higher
growth industries including light industrial/general manufacturing, food production, fulfillment and internet retail, as
well as niche verticals based on geographical and functional expertise. Veritiv’s packaging professionals create
customer value through supply chain solutions, structural and graphic packaging design and engineering,
automation, workflow and equipment services and kitting and fulfillment.

• Facility Solutions – The Facility Solutions segment sources and sells cleaning, break-room and other supplies such
as towels, tissues, wipers and dispensers, can liners, commercial cleaning chemicals, soaps and sanitizers, sanitary
maintenance supplies and equipment, safety and hazard supplies, and shampoos and amenities primarily in the U.S.,
Canada and Mexico. Veritiv is a leading distributor in the Facility Solutions segment. Through this segment we
manage a world class network of leading suppliers in most facilities solutions categories. Additionally, we offer
total cost of ownership solutions with re-merchandising, budgeting and compliance reporting, inventory
management, and a sales-force trained to bring leading vertical expertise to the major North American geographies.

• Print – The Print segment sells and distributes commercial printing, writing, copying, digital, wide format and

specialty paper products, graphics consumables and graphics equipment primarily in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
This segment also includes customized paper conversion services of commercial printing paper for distribution to
document centers and form printers. Our broad geographic platform of operations coupled with the breadth of paper
and graphics products, including our exclusive private brand offerings, provides a foundation to service national,
regional and local customers across North America.

• Publishing – The Publishing segment sells and distributes coated and uncoated commercial printing papers to

publishers, retailers, converters, printers and specialty businesses for use in magazines, catalogs, books, directories,
gaming, couponing, retail inserts and direct mail. This segment also provides print management, procurement and
supply chain management solutions to simplify paper and print procurement processes for our customers.

The table below summarizes net sales for each of the above reportable segments, as well as the Corporate & Other

category, as a percentage of consolidated net sales:

Packaging
Facility Solutions
Print
Publishing
Corporate & Other
Total

2017
38%
16%
33%
11%
2%
100%

Year Ended December 31,
2016
34%
15%
37%
13%
1%
100%

2015
32%
15%
38%
14%
1%
100%

Additional financial information regarding our reportable business segments and certain geographic information is

included in Item 7 of this report and in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Our History

On July 1, 2014 (the "Distribution Date"), International Paper Company ("International Paper") completed the spin-

off of xpedx to its shareholders (the "Spin-off"), forming a new public company known as Veritiv. Immediately following the
Spin-off, UWWH merged with and into Veritiv. The Spin-off and the Merger are collectively referred to as the
"Transactions".

Immediately following the completion of the Transactions, International Paper shareholders owned approximately

51%, and UWW Holdings, LLC, the former sole stockholder of UWWH (the "UWWH Stockholder"), which is jointly owned
by Bain Capital and Georgia-Pacific, owned approximately 49%, of the shares of Veritiv common stock on a fully-diluted
basis. Immediately following the completion of the Spin-off, International Paper did not own any shares of Veritiv common
stock. Veritiv’s common stock began regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange on July 2, 2014 under the ticker
symbol VRTV.

International Paper's distribution business was consolidated into a division operating under the xpedx name in 1998

to serve the U.S. and Mexico markets. International Paper grew its distribution business both organically and through the
acquisition of over 30 distribution businesses located across the U.S. and Mexico. Unisource was a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Alco Standard Corporation until its spin-off of Unisource in December 1996 whereby Unisource became a separate public
company. Unisource was acquired by Georgia-Pacific, now owned by Koch Industries, in July 1999. In November 2002,
Bain Capital acquired approximately a 60% ownership interest in Unisource, while Georgia-Pacific retained approximately a
40% ownership interest.

On August 31, 2017, Veritiv completed its acquisition of 100% of the equity interest in various All American
Containers entities (collectively, "AAC"), a family owned and operated distributor of rigid packaging, including plastic, glass
and metal containers, caps, closures and plastic pouches. The acquisition of AAC aligns with the Company's strategy of
investing in higher growth and higher margin segments of the business. Through the acquisition, Veritiv gains expertise in
rigid plastic, glass and metal packaging that complements its portfolio of packaging products and services. This acquisition
also provides Veritiv with additional marketing, selling and distribution channels into the growing U.S. rigid packaging
market. The rigid packaging market's primary product categories include paperboard, plastics, metals and glass.

Products and Services

Veritiv distributes well-known national and regional brand products as well as products marketed under its own

private label brands. Products under the Company’s private label brands are manufactured by third-party suppliers in
accordance with specifications established by the Company. Our portfolio of private label products includes:

• Coated and uncoated papers, coated board and cut size under the Endurance, nordic+, Econosource, Comet, Starbrite

•

Opaque Select and other brands;
Packaging products under the TUFflex brand, which include stretch film, mailers, shrink film, carton sealing tape,
and other specialty tapes; and

•

Foodservice disposable products, cleaning chemicals, towels and tissues, can liners, sanitary maintenance supplies
and a wide range of facility supplies products under the Reliable and Spring Grove brands.

The table below summarizes sales of products sold under private label brands as a percentage of the respective total

Company or applicable segment's net sales for the periods shown:

Packaging
Facility Solutions
Print
Total Company

Customers

Year Ended December 31,
2016
6%
8%
22%
11%

2015
6%
8%
19%
10%

2017
6%
8%
20%
10%

We serve customers across a broad range of industries, through a variety of means ranging from multi-year supply

agreements to transactional sales. The Company has valuable, multi-year, long-term supply agreements with many of its
largest customers that set forth the terms and conditions of sale, including product pricing and warranties. We enter into
incentive agreements with certain of our largest customers, which are generally based on sales to these customers. The
Company’s customers are generally not required to purchase any minimum amount of products under these agreements and
can place orders on an individual purchase order basis. However, the Company enters into negotiated supply agreements
with a minority of its customers.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, no single customer accounted for more than 5% of the

Company’s consolidated net sales.

Suppliers

We purchase our products from thousands of suppliers, both domestic and international, across different business

segments. Although varying by segment, the Company’s suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name
and private label products and, to a more limited extent, independent regional and private label suppliers. Suppliers are
selected based on customer demand for the product and a supplier’s total service, cost and product quality offering.

Our sourcing organization supports the purchasing of well-known national and regional brand products as well as
products marketed under our own private label brands from key national suppliers in the packaging, facility solutions and
print industries. The Publishing segment primarily operates as a direct ship business aligned with the Company’s core
supplier strategy. In addition, under the guidance and oversight of the sourcing team, our merchandising personnel located
within individual distribution centers source products not available within our core offering in order to meet specialized
customer needs.

The product sourcing program is designed to ensure that the Company is able to offer consistent product selections
and market competitive pricing across the enterprise while maintaining the ability to service localized market requirements.
Our procurement program is also focused on replenishment which includes purchase order placement and controlling the
total cost of inventory by proactively managing the number of day’s inventory on hand, negotiating favorable payment terms
and maintaining vendor-owned and vendor-managed programs. As one of the largest purchasers of paper, graphics,
packaging and facility supplies, we can qualify for volume allowances with some suppliers and can realize significant
economies of scale.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 38% of our purchases were made from ten suppliers.

Competition

The packaging, facility solutions, paper and publishing distribution industry is highly competitive, with numerous
regional and local competitors, and is a mature industry characterized by slowing growth or, in the case of paper, declining
net sales. The Company’s principal competitors include national, regional and local distributors, national and regional
manufacturers, independent brokers and both catalog-based and online business-to-business suppliers. Most of these

competitors generally offer a wide range of products at prices comparable to those Veritiv offers, though at varying service
levels. Additionally, new competition could arise from non-traditional sources, group purchasing organizations, e-commerce,
discount wholesalers or consolidation among competitors. Veritiv believes it offers the full range of services required to
effectively compete, but if new competitive sources appear, it may result in margin erosion or make it more difficult to attract
and retain customers.

The following summary briefly describes the key competitive landscape for each of Veritiv’s business segments:

• Packaging – The packaging market is fragmented and consists of competition from national and regional packaging
distributors, national and regional manufacturers of packaging materials, independent brokers and both catalog-
based and online business-to-business suppliers. Veritiv believes there are few national packaging distributors with
substrate neutral design capabilities similar to the Company’s capabilities.

• Facility Solutions – There are few national, but numerous regional and local distributors of facility supply solutions.

Several groups of distributors have created strategic alliances among multiple distributors to provide broader
geographic coverage for larger customers. Other key competitors include the business-to-business divisions of big
box stores, purchasing group affiliates and both catalog-based and online business-to-business suppliers.

• Print – Industry sources estimate that there are hundreds of regional and local companies engaged in the marketing
and distribution of paper and graphics products. While the Company believes there are few national distributors of
paper and graphics products similar to Veritiv, several regional and local distributors have cooperated together to
serve customers nationally. The Company’s customers also have the opportunity to purchase products directly from
paper and graphics manufacturers. In addition, competitors also include regional and local specialty distributors,
office supply and big box stores, online business-to-business suppliers, independent brokers and large commercial
printers that broker the sale of paper in connection with the sale of their printing services.

• Publishing – The publishing market is serviced by printers, paper brokers and distributors. The Company’s

customers also have the opportunity to purchase paper directly from paper manufacturers. The market consists
primarily of magazine and book publishers, cataloguers, direct mailers and retail customers using catalog, insert and
direct mail as a method of advertising.

We believe that our competitive advantages include over 1,800 sales and marketing professionals and the breadth of

our selection of quality products, including high-quality private brands. The breadth of products distributed and services
offered, the diversity of the types of customers served, and our broad geographic footprint in the U.S., Canada and Mexico
buffer the impact of regional economic declines while also providing a network to readily serve national accounts.

Distribution and Logistics

Timely and accurate delivery of a customer’s order, on a consistent basis, are important criteria in a customer’s
decision to purchase products and services from Veritiv. Delivery of products is provided through two primary channels,
either from the Company’s warehouses or directly from the manufacturer. Our distribution centers offer a range of delivery
options depending on the customer’s needs and preferences, and the strategic placement of the distribution centers also
allows for delivery of special or "rush" orders to many customers.

Working Capital

Veritiv's working capital needs generally reflect the need to carry significant amounts of inventory in our distribution

centers to meet delivery requirements of our customers, as well as significant accounts receivable balances. As is typical in
our industry, our customers often do not pay upon receipt, but are offered terms which are heavily dependent on the specific
circumstances of the sale.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017, Veritiv had approximately 8,900 employees worldwide, of which approximately 10%

were covered by collective bargaining agreements. Labor contract negotiations are handled on an individual basis by a team
of Veritiv Human Resources and Legal personnel. Approximately 41% of the Company’s unionized employees have
collective bargaining agreements that expire during 2018. We currently expect that we will be able to renegotiate such
agreements on satisfactory terms. We consider labor relations to be good.

Government Relations

As a distributor, our transportation operations are subject to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations. We are also subject to federal, state and local regulations regarding licensing and inspection of
facilities, including compliance with the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act. These regulations require us to comply
with health and safety standards to protect our employees from accidents and establish communication programs to transmit
information on the hazards of certain chemicals present in specific products that we distribute.

We are also subject to regulation by numerous U.S., Canadian and Mexican federal, state and local regulatory
agencies, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Labor, which sets employment practice standards for workers.
Although we are subject to other U.S., Canadian and Mexican federal, state and local provisions relating to the protection of
the environment and the discharge or destruction of materials, these provisions do not materially impact the use or operation
of the Company’s facilities. Compliance with these laws has not had, and is not anticipated to have, a material effect on
Veritiv’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

Intellectual Property

We have numerous well-recognized trademarks, represented primarily by our private label brands. Most of our
trademark registrations are effective for an initial period of 10 years, and we generally renew our trademark registrations
before their expiration dates for trademarks that are in use or have reasonable potential for future use. Although our Print,
Packaging and Facility Solutions segments rely on a number of trademarks that, in the aggregate, provide important
protections to the Company, no single trademark is material to any one of these segments. See the Products and Services
section above for additional information regarding our private label brand sales.

Veritiv does not have any material patents or licenses.

Seasonality

The Company’s operating results are subject to seasonal influences. Historically, our higher consolidated net sales

occur during the third and fourth quarters while our lowest consolidated net sales occur during the first quarter. The
Packaging segment net sales tend to increase each quarter throughout the year and net sales for the first quarter are typically
less than net sales for the fourth quarter of the preceding year. Production schedules for non-durable goods that build up to
the holidays and peak in the fourth quarter drive this seasonal net sales pattern. Net sales for the Facility Solutions segment
tend to be highest during the third and fourth quarters due to increased summer demand in the away-from-home resort, cruise
and hospitality markets, activities related to back-to-school and increased retail activity during the holidays. Within the Print
and Publishing segments, seasonality is driven by increased magazine advertising page counts, retail inserts, catalogs and
direct mail primarily due to back-to-school, political election and holiday-related advertising and promotions in the second
half of the year.

Executive Officers of the Company

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the individuals who serve as executive officers of the

Company as of March 1, 2018.

Name
Mary A. Laschinger
Stephen J. Smith
Charles B. Henry
Mark W. Hianik
Thomas S. Lazzaro
Barry R. Nelson
Elizabeth A. Patrick
Tracy L. Pearson
Daniel J. Watkoske

Age Position
57
54
53
57
54
53
50
47
49

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Senior Vice President Corporate Services
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Senior Vice President Field Sales and Operations
Senior Vice President Facility Solutions
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Senior Vice President Packaging
Senior Vice President Print and Veritiv Services

The following descriptions of the business experience of our executive officers include the principal positions held by

them since March 2013.

Mary A. Laschinger has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since July 2014. Ms.

Laschinger also served as Senior Vice President of International Paper Company, a global packaging and paper
manufacturing company, from 2007 to July 2014 and as President of its xpedx distribution business from January 2010 to
July 2014. Ms. Laschinger previously served as President of International Paper’s Europe, Middle East, Africa and Russia
business, Vice President and General Manager of International Paper’s Wood Products and Pulp businesses and in other
senior management roles at International Paper in sales, marketing, manufacturing and supply chain. Ms. Laschinger joined
International Paper in 1992. Prior to joining International Paper, Ms. Laschinger held various positions in sales, marketing
and supply chain at James River Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Ms. Laschinger has significant knowledge
and executive management experience running domestic and international manufacturing and distribution businesses as well
as a deep understanding of Veritiv and the industry in which it operates. Ms. Laschinger also serves as a director of Kellogg
Company and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

Stephen J. Smith has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since March 2014.

Previously, Mr. Smith served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Greetings Corporation, a
global greeting card company, from November 2006 to March 2014. Previously, Mr. Smith served as Vice President of
Investor Relations and Treasurer of American Greetings from April 2003 to November 2006. Prior to American Greetings,
Mr. Smith served as Vice President and Treasurer of General Cable Corporation, a global wire and cable manufacturer and
distributor, and Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Insilco Holding Company, a telecommunications and
electrical component products manufacturer. During Mr. Smith’s tenure as a public company chief financial officer, he helped
lead several strategic acquisitions and was responsible for the design and execution of the capital structure for a management
buyout.

Charles B. Henry has served as Senior Vice President Corporate Services since March 2016. Previously, Mr. Henry

served as Senior Vice President Commercial Excellence and Enterprise Initiatives of the Company from January 2016 to
March 2016. Previously, Mr. Henry served as Senior Vice President Integration and Change Management of the Company
from July 2014 to December 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Henry served as Vice President, Strategy Management and Integration
of xpedx from March 2013 to July 2014 and was a member of the xpedx Senior Lead Team. Prior to that, he served as
Director of the xpedx Strategy Management Office from February 2011 to March 2013. Prior to that, he served as a Director
in International Paper’s Supply Chain Project Management Office. Mr. Henry joined International Paper in 1986 and served
in a variety of supply chain, sales and general management roles within International Paper’s Program Management Office,
Printing and Communications Papers business and Global Supply Chain operations. Mr. Henry has significant strategy and
project management experience in the manufacturing and distribution industries.

Mark W. Hianik has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company since
January 2014. Previously, Mr. Hianik served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer for
Dex One Corporation, an advertising and marketing services company, from March 2012 to May 2013. Prior to that Mr.
Hianik served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Dex One (and its predecessor, R.H.
Donnelley Corporation) from April 2008 to March 2012. R.H. Donnelley filed for voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in May 2009 emerging with a confirmed plan as Dex One in January 2010 and Dex One filed a
pre-packaged bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11 in March 2013 to effect a merger consummated in April 2013. Mr.
Hianik previously served as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel for Tribune Company, a diversified media
company, and as a corporate and securities partner in private practice. Mr. Hianik has significant experience as a public
company general counsel and leader of other corporate functions as well as significant mergers and acquisitions, securities,
capital markets and corporate governance experience.

Thomas S. Lazzaro has served as Senior Vice President Field Sales and Operations of the Company since July 2014.

In this role, Mr. Lazzaro leads the Supply Chain and the Field Sales organizations. Previously, Mr. Lazzaro served as
Executive Vice President, Supply Chain of xpedx from March 2013 to July 2014 and was a member of the xpedx Senior Lead
Team. Mr. Lazzaro joined xpedx in January 2011 as Executive Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer, responsible for
all aspects of the purchasing organization. Prior to xpedx, Mr. Lazzaro was a senior executive with HD Supply, The Home
Depot and General Electric. Mr. Lazzaro has significant experience in general management, supply chain, operations and
finance in the manufacturing and distribution industries.

Barry R. Nelson has served as Senior Vice President Facility Solutions of the Company since December 2015.
Previously, Mr. Nelson served as Senior Vice President Publishing and Print Management of the Company from July 2014 to
December 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Nelson served as Group Vice President, Sales-Publishing for xpedx from December 2012
to July 2014. From August 2002 to December 2012, Mr. Nelson served as Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing for
NewPage Corporation, a paper manufacturing company. NewPage filed for voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code in September 2011 and emerged with a confirmed plan in December 2012. Previously, Mr. Nelson
served as Executive Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Client Delivery at ForestExpress, a technology joint venture of
leading forest product companies. Mr. Nelson has significant sales and sales leadership experience in the paper
manufacturing and distribution industries.

Elizabeth A. Patrick has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company since
July 2014. Prior to that, Ms. Patrick served as Vice President, Human Resources, of xpedx from March 2013 to July 2014
and was a member of International Paper Company’s Human Resources & Communications Lead Team and the xpedx Senior
Lead Team. Prior to that, she served as Director, Human Resources-Field Operations of xpedx from October 2012 to March
2013. Previously, Ms. Patrick served as Vice President of Human Resources of TE Connectivity, a global electronics
manufacturing and distribution company, from April 2008 to October 2012. Previously, Ms. Patrick served as Vice President
Human Resources of Guilford Mills, Inc., an automotive and specialty markets fabrics manufacturer, and in a variety of roles
of increased responsibility with General Motors Company and GM spin-off, Delphi Corporation, a global automotive parts
manufacturer. Ms. Patrick has significant human resources management and leadership experience.

Tracy L. Pearson has served as Senior Vice President Packaging of the Company since October 2016. Prior to that,

Ms. Pearson served as Vice President and General Manager, South Area, for the Container the Americas business of
International Paper Company, a global paper and packaging manufacturing company, from May 2016 to October 2016. Prior
to that, Ms. Pearson served as Vice President and General Manager for the Foodservice packaging business of International
Paper from August 2011 to May 2016. Ms. Pearson joined International Paper in 1994 and served in a variety of sales,
supply chain, marketing, process engineering, product development, and sales and general management roles within
International Paper’s packaging and print businesses. Ms. Pearson has significant experience in general management, sales
and sales management, and supply chain in the packaging and paper manufacturing and distribution industries.

Daniel J. Watkoske has served as Senior Vice President Print of the Company since July 2014 and, since October
2016, has also served as Senior Vice President of Veritiv Services. Prior to that, Mr. Watkoske served as Executive Vice
President Sales for xpedx from January 2011 to July 2014 and was a member of the xpedx Senior Lead Team. Prior to that,
Mr. Watkoske served as Group Vice President for the xpedx Metro New York Group from January 2008 to January 2011.
Previously, Mr. Watkoske served as Vice President National Accounts for xpedx. Mr. Watkoske joined International Paper in
1989 as a sales trainee for Nationwide Papers, which later became part of xpedx. Mr. Watkoske has significant sales, sales
management and operations experience in the paper and packaging distribution industries.

We have been advised that there are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors and that

there is no arrangement or understanding between any of our executive officers and any other persons pursuant to which they
were appointed, respectively, as an executive officer.

Company Information

Veritiv was incorporated in Delaware on July 10, 2013. Our principal executive offices are located at 1000

Abernathy Road NE, Building 400, Suite 1700, Atlanta, Georgia 30328.

Our corporate website is http://www.veritivcorp.com. Information contained on our website is not part of this

Annual Report on Form 10-K. Through the "Investor Relations" portion of this website, we make available, free of charge,
our proxy statements, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and
other relevant filings with the SEC and any amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material
has been filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These filings are also accessible on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with the other information contained in this report, in

evaluating us and an investment in our common stock. The risks described below are the material risks, although not the

only risks, relating to us and our common stock. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develop into actual events,
these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Risks Relating to Our Business

The industry-wide decline in demand for paper and related products could have a material adverse effect on our

financial condition and results of operations.

Our Print and Publishing businesses rely heavily on the sale of paper and related products. The industry-wide decrease

in demand for paper and related products in key markets we serve places continued pressure on our revenues and profit
margins and makes it more difficult to maintain or grow earnings. This trend is expected to continue. The failure to
effectively differentiate us from our competitors in the face of increased use of email, increased and permanent product
substitution, including less print advertising, more electronic billing, more e-commerce, fewer catalogs and a reduced volume
of mail, could have a material adverse effect on market share, sales and profitability through increased expenditures or
decreased prices. Our failure to grow the Packaging and Facility Solutions businesses at rates adequate to offset the expected
decline in Print and Publishing could also have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Competition in our industry may adversely impact our margins and our ability to retain customers and make it

difficult to maintain our market share and profitability.

The business-to-business distribution industry is highly competitive, with numerous regional and local competitors, and

is a mature industry characterized by slowing revenue growth. Our principal competitors include regional and local
distributors in the Print segment; regional, national and international paper manufacturers and other merchants and brokers in
the Publishing segment; national distributors, national and regional manufacturers and independent brokers in the Packaging
segment; and national, regional and local distributors in the Facility Solutions segment. Most of these competitors generally
offer a wide range of products at prices comparable to those we offer. Additionally, new competition could arise from non-
traditional sources, group purchasing organizations, e-commerce, discount wholesalers or consolidation among competitors.
New competitive sources may result in increased focus on pricing and on limiting price increases, or may require increased
discounting. Such competition may result in margin erosion or make it difficult to attract and retain customers.

Increased competition within the industry, reduced demand for paper, increased and permanent product substitution

through less print advertising, more electronic billing, more e-commerce, fewer catalogs, a reduced volume of mail and
general economic conditions has served to further increase pressure on the industry’s profit margins, and continued margin
pressure within the industry may have a material adverse impact on our operating results and profitability.

Adverse developments in general business and economic conditions as well as conditions in the global capital and

credit markets could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products and our financial condition and
results of operations.

The persistently slow rate of increase in the U.S. gross domestic product ("GDP") in recent years has adversely affected

our results of operations. If GDP continues to increase at a slow rate or if economic growth declines, demand for the
products we sell will be adversely affected. In addition, volatility in the global capital and credit markets, which impacts
interest rates, currency exchange rates and the availability of credit, could have a material adverse effect on the business,
financial condition and results of operations of our company and our customers. We have exposure to counterparties with
which we routinely execute transactions. Such counterparties include customers and financial institutions. A bankruptcy or
liquidity event by one or more of our counterparties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.

In order to compete, we must attract, train and retain highly qualified employees, and the failure to do so could have

a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

To successfully compete, we must attract, train and retain a large number of highly qualified employees while
controlling related labor costs. Specifically, we must recruit and retain qualified sales professionals. If we were to lose a
significant amount of our sales professionals, we could lose a material amount of sales, which would have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Many of our sales professionals are subject to confidentiality and
non-competition agreements. If our sales professionals were to violate these agreements, we could seek to legally enforce
these agreements, but we may incur substantial costs in connection with such enforcement and may not be successful in such

enforcement. We compete with other businesses for employees and invest significant resources in training and motivating
them. There is no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain highly qualified employees. The inability to retain or hire
qualified personnel at economically reasonable compensation levels would restrict our ability to improve our business and
result in lower operating results and profitability.

Our business may be adversely affected by work stoppages, union negotiations and labor disputes.

Approximately 10% of our employees are currently covered by collective bargaining or other similar labor agreements.

Historically, the effects of collective bargaining and other similar labor agreements have not been significant. However, if a
larger number of our employees were to unionize, including in the wake of any future legislation or administrative regulation
that makes it easier for employees to unionize, the effect may be negative.

Approximately 41% of the Company’s unionized employees have collective bargaining agreements that expire during

2018. Any inability to negotiate acceptable new contracts under these collective bargaining arrangements could cause strikes
or other work stoppages, and new contracts could result in increased operating costs. If any such strikes or other work
stoppages occur, or if additional employees become represented by a union, a disruption of our operations and higher labor
costs could result. Labor relations matters affecting our suppliers of products and services could also adversely affect our
business from time to time.

The loss of any of our significant customers could adversely affect our financial condition.

Our ten largest customers generated approximately 9% of our consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31,

2017, and our largest customer accounted for approximately 2% of our consolidated net sales in that same period. We cannot
guarantee that we will maintain or improve our relationships with these customers or that we will continue to supply these
customers at historic levels.

Generally, our customers are not contractually required to purchase any minimum amount of products. Should such

customers purchase products sold by us in significantly lower quantities than they have in the past, such decreased purchases
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

In addition, consolidation among customers could also result in changes to the purchasing habits and volumes among
some of our present customers. The loss of one or more of these significant customers, a significant customer’s decision to
purchase our products in substantially lower quantities than they have in the past, or a deterioration in the relationship with
any of these customers could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Changes in business conditions in our international operations could adversely affect our business and results of

operations.

Our operating results and business prospects could be substantially affected by risks related to Canada, Mexico and
other non-U.S. countries where we sell and distribute our products. Some of our operations are in or near locations that have
suffered from political, social and economic issues; civil unrest; and a high level of criminal activity. In those locations
where we have employees or operations, we may incur substantial costs to maintain the safety of our personnel and the
security of our operations. Downturns in economic activity, adverse tax consequences or any change in social, political or
labor conditions in any of the countries in which we operate could negatively affect our financial results. In addition, our
international operations are subject to regulation under U.S. law and other laws related to operations in foreign jurisdictions.
For example, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the "FCPA") prohibits U.S. companies and their representatives
from offering, promising, authorizing or making payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining
business abroad. Failure to comply with domestic or foreign laws could result in various adverse consequences, including the
imposition of civil or criminal sanctions and the prosecution of executives overseeing our international operations.

We purchase all of the products we sell to our customers from other parties, and conditions beyond our control can

interrupt our supplies and increase our product costs.

As a distributor, we obtain our packaging, paper and facility products from third-party suppliers. Our business and
financial results are dependent on our ability to purchase products from suppliers not controlled by us that we, in turn, sell to
our customers. We may not be able to obtain the products we need on open credit, with market or other favorable terms, or at
all. During the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 38% of our purchases were made from ten suppliers. A

sustained disruption in our ability to source products from one or more of the largest of these vendors might have a material
impact on our ability to fulfill customer orders resulting in lost sales and, in rare cases, damages for late or non-delivery.

For the most part, we do not have a significant number of long-term contracts with our suppliers committing them to
provide products to us. Suppliers may not provide the products and supplies needed in the quantities and at the prices and
times requested. We are also subject to delays caused by interruption in production and increases in product costs based on
conditions outside of our control. These conditions include raw material shortages, environmental restrictions on operations,
work slowdowns, work interruptions, strikes or other job actions by employees of suppliers, product recalls, transportation
interruptions, unavailability of fuel or increases in fuel costs, competitive demands and natural disasters or other catastrophic
events. Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of paper, packaging and facility products as a result of any of the foregoing
factors or otherwise could mean that we could not fulfill our obligations to customers, and customers may turn to other
distributors.

In addition, increases in product costs may reduce our margins if we are unable to pass all or a portion of these costs

along to our customers, which we have historically had difficulty doing. Any such inability may have a negative impact on
our business and our profitability.

Changes in prices for raw materials, including pulp, paper and resin, could negatively impact our results of

operations and cash flows.

Changes in prices for raw materials, such as pulp, paper and resin, could significantly impact our results of operations

in the print market. Although we do not produce paper products and are not directly exposed to risk associated with
production, declines in pulp and paper prices, driven by falling secular demand, periods of industry overcapacity and
overproduction by paper suppliers, may adversely affect our revenues and net income to the extent such factors produce
lower paper prices. Declining pulp and paper prices generally produce lower revenues and profits, even when volume and
trading margin percentages remain constant. During periods of declining pulp and paper prices, customers may alter
purchasing patterns and defer paper purchases or deplete inventory levels until long-term price stability occurs. Alternatively,
if prices for raw materials rise and we are unable to pass these increases on to our customers, our results of operations and
profits may also be negatively impacted.

We may not be able to fully compensate for increases in fuel costs.

Volatile fuel prices have a direct impact on our industry. The cost of fuel affects the price paid by us for products as

well as the costs incurred to deliver products to our customers. Although we have been able to pass along a portion of
increased fuel costs to our customers in the past, there is no guarantee that we can continue to do so. As such, we may
experience difficulties in passing all or a portion of these costs along to our customers, which may have a negative impact on
our business and our profitability.

Inclement weather, anti-terrorism measures and other disruptions to the transportation network could impact our

distribution system and operations.

Our ability to provide efficient distribution of products to our customers is an integral component of our overall
business strategy. Disruptions at distribution centers or shipping ports or the closure of roads or imposition of other driving
bans due to natural events such as flooding, tornadoes and blizzards may affect our ability to both maintain key products in
inventory and deliver products to our customers on a timely basis, which may in turn adversely affect our results of
operations.

Furthermore, in the aftermath of terrorist attacks in the United States, federal, state and local authorities have

implemented and continue to implement various security measures that affect many parts of the transportation network in the
U.S. and abroad. Our customers typically require delivery of products in short time frames and rely on our on-time delivery
capabilities. If security measures disrupt or impede the timing of our deliveries, we may fail to meet the needs of our
customers, or may incur increased expenses to do so. Any of these disruptions to our operations may reduce our sales and
have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on a variety of IT and telecommunications systems and the Internet, and any failure of these

systems could adversely impact our business and operating results.

We depend on information technology ("IT") and telecommunications systems and the Internet for our operations.
These systems support a variety of functions including inventory management, order placement and processing with vendors
and from customers, shipping, shipment tracking and billing. Our information systems are vulnerable to natural disasters,
wide-area telecommunications or power utility outages, terrorist or cyber-attacks and other major disruptions and our
redundant information systems may not operate effectively.

Failures or significant downtime of our IT or telecommunications systems for any reason, including as a result of

disruptions from integrating the xpedx and Unisource businesses, could prevent us from taking customer orders, printing
product pick-lists, shipping products, billing customers and handling call volume. Sales also may be adversely impacted if
our reseller and retail customers are unable to access pricing and product availability information. We also rely on the
Internet, electronic data interchange and other electronic integrations for a large portion of our orders and information
exchanges with our suppliers and customers. The Internet and individual websites have experienced a number of disruptions
and slowdowns, some of which were caused by organized attacks. In addition, some websites have experienced security
breakdowns. If we were to experience a security breakdown, disruption or breach that compromised sensitive information, it
could harm our relationships with our suppliers and customers. Disruption of our website or the Internet in general could
impair our order processing or more generally prevent our suppliers and resellers from accessing information. Failures of our
systems could also lead to delivery delays and may expose us to litigation and penalties under some of our contracts. Any
significant increase in our IT and telecommunications costs or temporary or permanent loss of our IT or telecommunications
systems, including as a result of disruptions from integrating the xpedx and Unisource businesses, could harm our
relationships with our customers and suppliers and result in lost sales, business delays and bad publicity. The occurrence of
any of these events, as well as the costs we may incur in preventing or responding to such events, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to cyber-security risks related to breaches of security pertaining to sensitive company, customer,
employee and vendor information as well as breaches in the technology that manages operations and other business
processes.

Our operations rely upon secure IT systems for data capture, processing, storage and reporting. Our IT systems, and
those of our third-party providers, could become subject to cyber-attacks. Network, system, application and data breaches
could result in operational disruptions or information misappropriation including, but not limited to, interruption of systems
availability, or denial of access to and misuse of applications required by our customers to conduct business with us. Access
to internal applications required to plan our operations, source materials, ship finished goods and account for orders could be
denied or misused. Theft of intellectual property or trade secrets, and inappropriate disclosure of confidential information,
could stem from such incidents. Any operational disruptions or misappropriation of information could harm our relationship
with our customers and suppliers, result in lost sales, business delays and negative publicity and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Costs to comply with environmental, health and safety laws, and to satisfy any liability or obligation imposed under

such laws, could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operations are subject to U.S. and international environmental, health and safety laws, including laws regulating the

emission or discharge of materials into the environment, the use, storage, treatment, disposal and management of hazardous
substances and waste, the investigation and remediation of contamination and the health and safety of our employees and the
public. We could incur substantial fines or sanctions, enforcement actions (including orders limiting our operations or
requiring corrective measures), investigation, remediation and closure costs and third-party claims for property damage and
personal injury as a result of violations of, or liabilities or obligations under, environmental, health and safety laws. We could
be held liable for the costs to address contamination at any real property we have ever owned, operated or used as a disposal
site.

In addition, changes in, or new interpretations of, existing laws, the discovery of previously unknown contamination, or
the imposition of other environmental liabilities or obligations in the future, may lead to additional compliance or other costs
that could impact our business and results of operations. Moreover, as environmental issues, such as climate change, have
become more prevalent, U.S. and foreign governments have responded, and are expected to continue to respond, with

increased legislation and regulation, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

Expenditures related to the cost of compliance with laws, rules and regulations could adversely impact our business

and results of operations.

Our operations are subject to U.S. and international laws and regulations, including regulations of the U.S. Department
of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the import and export of goods, customs regulations, Office
of Foreign Asset Control and the FCPA. Expenditures related to the cost of compliance with laws, rules and regulations
could adversely impact our business and results of operations. In addition, we could incur substantial fines or sanctions,
enforcement actions (including orders limiting our operations or requiring corrective measures), and third-party claims for
property damage and personal injury as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, laws, regulations, codes and common
law.

Tax assessments and unclaimed property audits by governmental authorities could adversely impact our operating

results.

We remit a variety of taxes and fees to various governmental authorities, including federal and state income taxes,

excise taxes, property taxes, sales and use taxes and payroll taxes. The taxes and fees remitted by us are subject to review
and audit by the applicable governmental authorities which could result in liability for additional assessments. In addition,
we are subject to unclaimed property (escheat) laws which require us to turn over to certain government authorities the
property of others held by us that has been unclaimed for a specified period of time. We are subject to audit by individual
U.S. states with regard to our escheatment practices. The legislation and regulations related to tax and unclaimed property
matters tend to be complex and subject to varying interpretations by both government authorities and taxpayers. Although
management believes that the positions we have taken are reasonable, various taxing authorities may challenge certain of the
positions we have taken, which may also potentially result in additional liabilities for taxes, unclaimed property, interest and
penalties in excess of accrued liabilities. Our positions are reviewed as events occur such as the availability of new
information, the lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, the conclusion of tax audits, the measurement of additional
estimated liabilities based on current calculations, the identification of new tax contingencies or the rendering of relevant
court decisions. An unfavorable resolution of assessments by a governmental authority could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.

Adverse developments in general business and economic conditions, including the industry-wide decline in demand

for paper and related products could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations
impairing our ability to use Net Operating Loss ("NOL") carryforwards and other deferred tax assets.

The realization of our NOLs and other deferred tax assets depends on the timing and amount of taxable income earned

by our company in the future and a lack of future taxable income would adversely affect our ability to realize these tax assets.
Tax attributes are generally subject to expiration at various times in the future to the extent that they have not previously been
applied to offset the taxable income of our company, and there is a risk that our existing NOL carryforwards could expire
unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities.

The Merger resulted in an ownership change for Unisource under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the

"Code"), limiting the use of Unisource’s NOLs to offset future taxable income for both U.S. federal and state income tax
purposes. Moreover, future trading of our stock by our significant shareholders may result in additional ownership changes
as defined under Section 382 of the Code, further limiting the use of Unisource's NOLs. These limitations may affect the
availability and the timing of when these NOLs may be used which could impair our deferred tax assets which, in turn, may
adversely impact the timing and amount of cash taxes payable by our company.

Significant judgment is required in evaluating the need for and magnitude of appropriate valuation allowances against

deferred tax assets. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating future taxable income, as well as successful
implementation of various tax planning strategies. Although we believe that the judgments and estimates with respect to the
valuation allowances are appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances, actual results could differ from projected
results, which could give rise to additions to valuation allowances or reductions in valuation allowances. It is possible that
such changes could have a material adverse effect on the amount of income tax expense (benefit) recorded in our
consolidated statement of operations.

Our inability to renew existing leases on acceptable terms, negotiate rent decreases or concessions and identify

affordable real estate could adversely affect our operating results.

We may be unable to successfully negotiate or renew existing leases at attractive rents, negotiate rent decreases or

concessions or identify affordable real estate. A key factor in our operating performance is the location and associated real
estate costs of our distribution centers. In particular, approximately 24 of our real estate financing agreements expire in June
2018 which accounted for approximately 20% of our total operating leased square footage as of December 31, 2017. Our
inability to negotiate or renew these or any other leases on favorable terms, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on
our business and results of operations due to, among other things, any resultant increased lease payments.

Results of legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

We rely on manufacturers and other suppliers to provide us with the products and equipment we sell, distribute and

service. As we do not have direct control over the quality of the products manufactured or supplied by such third-party
suppliers, we are exposed to risks relating to the quality of the products and equipment we sell, distribute and service. It is
possible that inventory from a manufacturer or supplier could be sold to our customers and later be alleged to have quality
problems or to have caused personal injury, subjecting us to potential claims from customers or third parties. Our ability to
hold such manufacturer or supplier liable will depend on a variety of factors, including its financial viability. Moreover, as
we increase the number of private label products we distribute, our exposure to potential liability for product liability claims
may increase. Finally, even if we are successful in defending any claim relating to the products or equipment we distribute,
claims of this nature could negatively impact our reputation and customer confidence in our products, equipment and
company. We have been subject to such claims in the past, which have been resolved without material financial impact. We
also operate a significant number of facilities and a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles and therefore face the risk of
premises-related liabilities and vehicle-related liabilities including traffic accidents.

From time to time, we may also be involved in government inquiries and investigations, as well as class action,
employment and other litigation. We cannot predict with certainty the outcomes of these legal proceedings and other
contingencies, including environmental remediation and other proceedings commenced by government authorities. The costs
and other effects of pending litigation against us cannot be determined with certainty. There can be no assurance that the
outcome of any lawsuit or claim or its effect on our business or financial condition will be as expected. The defense of these
lawsuits and claims may divert our management’s attention, and significant expenses may be incurred as a result. In addition,
we may be required to pay damage awards or settlements, or become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, that
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Although we currently maintain insurance coverage to address some of these types of liabilities, we cannot make
assurances that we will be able to obtain such insurance on acceptable terms in the future, if at all, or that any such insurance
will provide adequate coverage against potential claims. In addition, we may choose not to seek to obtain such insurance in
the future. Moreover, indemnification rights that we have may be insufficient or unavailable to protect us against potential
loss exposures.

We may not be able to adequately protect our material intellectual property and other proprietary rights, or to defend

successfully against intellectual property infringement claims by third parties.

Our ability to compete effectively depends in part upon our intellectual property rights, including but not limited to

trademarks, copyrights and proprietary technology. The use of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures and
agreements, and trademark, copyright, unfair competition, trade secret and other laws to protect intellectual property rights
and proprietary technology may not be adequate. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights and
protect proprietary technology, or to defend against claims by third parties that our conduct or our use of intellectual property
infringes upon such third-party’s intellectual property rights. Any intellectual property litigation or claims brought against us,
whether or not meritorious, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources, and there can be no assurances
that favorable final outcomes will be obtained. The terms of any settlement or judgment may require us to pay substantial
amounts to the other party or cease exercising our rights in such intellectual property, including ceasing the use of certain
trademarks used by us to distinguish our services from those of others or ceasing the exercise of our rights in copyrightable
works. In addition, we may be required to seek a license to continue practices found to be in violation of a third-party’s
rights, which may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all. Our business, financial condition or results of operations
could be adversely affected as a result.

Our pension and health care costs are subject to numerous factors which could cause these costs to change.

Our pension and health care costs are dependent upon numerous factors resulting from actual plan experience and

assumptions of future experience, including, for pension costs, actuarial assumptions regarding life expectancies. Pension
plan assets are primarily made up of equity and fixed income investments. Fluctuations in actual equity market returns,
changes in general interest rates and changes in the number of retirees may result in increased pension costs in future periods.
Significant changes in any of these factors may adversely impact our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

We participate in multi-employer pension plans and multi-employer health and welfare plans, which could create

additional obligations and payment liabilities.

We contribute to multi-employer defined benefit pension plans as well as multi-employer health and welfare plans
under the terms of collective bargaining agreements that cover certain unionized employee groups in the United States. The
risks of participating in multi-employer pension plans differ from single employer-sponsored plans and such plans are subject
to regulation under the Pension Protection Act (the "PPA"). Multi-employer pension plans are cost-sharing plans subject to
collective-bargaining agreements. Contributions to a multi-employer plan by one employer are not specifically earmarked
for its employees and may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers. If a participating
employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan are borne by the remaining participating
employers. In addition, if a multi-employer plan is determined to be underfunded based on the criteria established by the
PPA, the plan may be required to implement a financial improvement plan or rehabilitation plan that may require additional
contributions or surcharges by participating employers.

In addition to the contributions discussed above, we could be obligated to pay additional amounts, known as withdrawal

liabilities, upon decrease or cessation of participation in a multi-employer pension plan. Although an employer may obtain
an estimate of such liability, the final calculation of the withdrawal liability may not be able to be determined for an extended
period of time. Generally, the cash obligation of such withdrawal liability is payable over a 20 year period.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and impair our ability to operate our

business.

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $934.8 million in total indebtedness, reflecting borrowings of $897.7

million under the asset-based lending facility (the "ABL Facility"), $23.6 million of financing obligations (including
financing obligations to a related party exclusive of the non-monetary portion) and $13.5 million of equipment capital lease
and other obligations. This level of indebtedness could have important consequences to our financial condition, operating
results and business, including the following:

•

•
•

limiting our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt
service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes;
increasing our cost of borrowing;
requiring that a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations be dedicated to payments on our indebtedness
instead of other purposes, including operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;

• making it more difficult for us to make payments on our indebtedness or satisfy other obligations;
•

exposing us to risk of (i) increased interest rates on our borrowings in excess of our interest rate cap and (ii)
increased interest rates of up to 3% on our borrowings covered by our interest rate cap because all of our borrowings
under the ABL Facility are at variable rates of interest;
limiting our ability to make the expenditures necessary to complete the integration of xpedx’s business with
Unisource’s business;
limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared
to our competitors that have less debt; and
increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions or in our business, and making us unable
to carry out capital spending that is important to our growth.

•

Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur substantially more indebtedness in the future.

This could further exacerbate the risks to our financial condition described above.

We may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future, including secured indebtedness. Although the
agreements governing the ABL Facility contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are
subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the additional indebtedness incurred in compliance with these
restrictions could be substantial. If new indebtedness is added to our current indebtedness levels, the related risks we will
face could intensify.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain restrictive covenants, which could restrict our operational

flexibility.

The agreements governing the ABL Facility contain restrictions and limitations on our ability to engage in activities that

may be in our long-term best interests, including financial and other restrictive covenants that could limit our ability to:

incur additional indebtedness or guaranties, or issue certain preferred shares;
pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions;
repurchase, prepay or redeem subordinated indebtedness;

create liens;

•
•
•
• make investments or acquisitions;
•
• make negative pledges;
•
•
•
•

consolidate or merge with another company;
sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;
enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and
change the nature of our business.

The agreements governing the ABL Facility also contain other restrictions customary for asset-based facilities of this

nature.

Our ability to borrow additional amounts under the ABL Facility will depend upon satisfaction of these covenants.
Events beyond our control could affect our ability to meet these covenants. Our failure to comply with obligations under the
agreements governing the ABL Facility may result in an event of default under those agreements. A default, if not cured or
waived, may permit acceleration of our indebtedness. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we cannot be certain that we will
have sufficient funds available to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that we will have the ability to refinance the accelerated
indebtedness on terms favorable to us or at all. This could have serious consequences to our business, financial condition and
operating results and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent.

Risks Relating to the Spin-off and Merger

We may not realize the full benefits of the anticipated synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities from the

Merger.

The benefits of the Merger depend, in part, on our ability to realize anticipated growth opportunities, cost savings
and other synergies. Even if we are able to integrate the xpedx and Unisource businesses successfully, this integration may
not result in the realization of the full benefits of the growth opportunities and cost savings and other synergies that we
currently expect from this integration within the anticipated time frame or at all. We have incurred and will continue to incur
substantial expenses in connection with the integration of these businesses. Such expenses may exceed current estimates and
accordingly, the full benefits from the Merger may be offset by costs or delays incurred in integrating the businesses.

The integration of the xpedx business with the Unisource business following the Transactions may present

significant challenges.

There is a significant degree of difficulty and management distraction inherent in the process of integrating the

xpedx and Unisource businesses which include the challenge and cost of integrating the IT systems of each company and
network optimization.

The continuation of the integration process may cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of
our business and may require us to incur substantial out-of-pocket costs. Members of our senior management have devoted
and will continue to devote considerable amounts of time and attention to the integration process.

We cannot assure you that we will successfully or cost-effectively finalize the integration of the xpedx and

Unisource businesses. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.

We have incurred and continue to incur significant costs and charges associated with the Transactions that could

affect our period-to-period operating results.

Through December 31, 2017, we have incurred approximately $221 million in costs and charges associated with the
Transactions, including approximately $82 million for capital expenditures and $25 million related to the complete or partial
withdrawal from various multi-employer pension plans. We anticipate that we will incur additional costs and charges
associated with the Transactions. We are not able to quantify the total amount of these costs and charges or the period in
which they will be incurred as the operating plans affecting these costs are evolving and most charges relating to the
withdrawal from multi-employer pension plans are uncertain. Excluding the multi-employer pension plan withdrawal
charges, we currently anticipate that total net costs and charges associated with the Transactions will be approximately $225
to $250 million through December 31, 2018. The amount and timing of these costs and charges could adversely affect our
period-to-period operating results, which could result in a reduction in the market price of shares of our common stock.
Moreover, delays in completing the integration may reduce or delay the synergies and other benefits expected from the
Transactions and such reduction may be material.

If costs to integrate our IT infrastructure and network systems are more than amounts that have been budgeted, our

business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We expect to incur additional costs associated with achieving anticipated cost savings and other synergies from the

Transactions. Some of these costs will consist of information technology infrastructure, systems integration and planning.
The primary areas of spending will be integrating our financial, operational and human resources systems. We expect that a
portion of these expenditures will be capitalized. Such expenditures and other integration costs could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the Spin-off does not qualify as a tax-free spin-off under Section 355 of the Code, including as a result of

subsequent acquisitions of stock of International Paper or our company, then International Paper and/or the
International Paper shareholders may be required to pay substantial U.S. federal income taxes.

In connection with the Transactions, International Paper received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue

Service ("IRS") to the effect that the Spin-off and certain related transactions will qualify as tax-free to International Paper
and the International Paper shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Although a private letter ruling from the IRS
generally is binding on the IRS, the IRS ruling does not rule that the Spin-off satisfies every requirement for a tax-free spin-
off under Section 355 of the Code, and we and International Paper relied solely on the opinion of counsel for comfort that
such additional requirements are satisfied. We also received an opinion of counsel to the effect that the Spin-off will qualify
as tax-free to International Paper and the International Paper shareholders. This opinion relied on the IRS ruling as to matters
covered by the IRS ruling.

The IRS ruling and such opinion were based on, among other things, certain representations and assumptions as to

factual matters made by us, International Paper and UWWH, including assumptions concerning Section 355(e) of the Code
as discussed below. The failure of any factual representation or assumption to be true, correct and complete in all material
respects could adversely affect the validity of the IRS ruling or such opinion. An opinion of counsel represents counsel’s best
legal judgment, is not binding on the IRS or the courts, and the IRS or the courts may not agree with the opinion. In addition,
the IRS ruling and such opinion were based on then current law, and cannot be relied upon if current law changes with
retroactive effect.

If the Spin-off does not qualify as a tax-free spin-off under Section 355 of the Code, then the receipt of our common

stock would be taxable to the International Paper shareholders, International Paper might recognize a substantial gain on the
Spin-off, and we may be required to indemnify International Paper for the tax on such gain pursuant to the Tax Matters
Agreement we entered into with International Paper in connection with the Spin-off.

In addition, the Spin-off will be taxable to International Paper pursuant to Section 355(e) of the Code if there is a 50%
or more change in ownership of either International Paper or our company, directly or indirectly, as part of a plan or series of
related transactions that include the Spin-off. Because the International Paper shareholders collectively owned more than
50% of our common stock upon the Merger, the Merger alone will not cause the Spin-off to be taxable to International Paper
under Section 355(e) of the Code. However, Section 355(e) of the Code might apply if other acquisitions of stock of
International Paper before or after the Merger, or of our company after the Merger, are considered to be part of a plan or
series of related transactions that include the Spin-off. If Section 355(e) of the Code applied, then International Paper might
recognize a substantial amount of taxable gain, and we may be required to indemnify International Paper for the tax on such
gain pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement.

If the Merger does not qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code, or if the Subsidiary
Merger does not qualify as a transfer of property to Unisource under Section 351(a) of the Code, then we may be required
to pay substantial U.S. federal income taxes.

In connection with the Transactions, we received an opinion of counsel to the effect that the Merger will qualify as a
tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code and UWWH received an opinion of counsel to the effect that the
merger of xpedx Intermediate with and into Unisource (the "Subsidiary Merger" and, collectively with the Merger the
"Mergers") will qualify as a transfer of property to Unisource under Section 351(a) of the Code. In addition, International
Paper received private letter rulings from the IRS to the effect that the Merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code and that the Subsidiary Merger will qualify as a transfer of property to Unisource under Section
351(a) of the Code. Although a private letter ruling from the IRS generally is binding on the IRS, the IRS rulings do not rule
that the Merger satisfies every requirement for a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code, or that the
Subsidiary Merger satisfies every requirement for a transfer of property to Unisource under Section 351(a) of the Code. The
parties involved have each relied on an opinion of counsel for comfort that such additional requirements are satisfied.

The IRS rulings and such opinions were based on, among other things, certain representations and assumptions as to
factual matters made by us, International Paper and UWWH. The failure of any factual representation or assumption to be
true, correct and complete in all material respects could adversely affect the validity of the respective IRS rulings and such
opinions. An opinion of counsel represents counsel’s best legal judgment, is not binding on the IRS or the courts, and the
IRS or the courts may not agree with the opinion. In addition, the IRS rulings and such opinions were based on then current
law, and cannot be relied upon if current law changes with retroactive effect.

If the Merger does not qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code, then UWWH would be

considered to have made a taxable sale of its assets to us and we would be required to pay the U.S. federal income tax on the
gain, if any, arising from such taxable sale as a result of being the surviving corporation in the Merger.

If the Subsidiary Merger does not qualify as a transfer of property to Unisource under Section 351(a) of the Code, then
we would be considered to have made a taxable sale of the assets of xpedx Intermediate to Unisource, and we may either be
required to pay the U.S. federal income tax on such sale or to indemnify International Paper for the U.S. federal income tax
on such sale pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

Our stock price may fluctuate significantly.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely, depending on many factors, some of which may be

beyond our control, including:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in the operating results of our company due to factors related to our business;
success or failure of the strategy of our company;
the quarterly or annual earnings of our company, or those of other companies in our industry;
continued industry-wide decrease in demand for paper and related products;
our ability to obtain third-party financing as needed;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions or dispositions;
restrictions on our ability to pay dividends under our ABL Facility;
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies;
investor perception of our company;
natural or environmental disasters that investors believe may affect our company;
overall market fluctuations;
a large sale of our stock by a significant shareholder;
results from any material litigation or government investigation;
changes in laws and regulations affecting our company or any of the principal products sold by our company; and
general economic and political conditions and other external factors.

Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a

particular company. These broad market fluctuations could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

If securities or industry analysts do not continue to publish research, or publish unfavorable research, about our

company, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts

publish about us and our business. If the current coverage of our company by securities or industry analysts ceases, the
trading price for our stock would be negatively impacted. In addition, if one or more of these analysts downgrades our stock
or publishes misleading or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of
these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could
decrease, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

A significant percentage of our outstanding common stock is held by our three largest shareholders, and certain of
those shareholders exercise significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval. So long as a significant
percentage of our common stock continues to be held by a small number of shareholders, the liquidity of our common
stock may be impacted, and future sales by those shareholders may result in a reduction in the market price of our
common stock.

Our three largest shareholders collectively owned approximately 60% of our outstanding common stock as of

December 31, 2017. As a result, certain of these shareholders may exercise significant influence over all matters requiring
shareholder approval, including approval of significant corporate transactions, which may reduce the market price of our
common stock. Additionally, the interests of these shareholders may conflict with the interests of our other shareholders.

This concentrated ownership could also result in a limited amount of shares being available to be traded in the

market, resulting in reduced liquidity. Further, all of the shares of our common stock owned by the UWWH Stockholder are
registered for resale under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and, subject to certain limitations, all or a portion
of such shares may be offered and sold to the public in the future. When some or all of the shares held by the UWWH
Stockholder are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, the market price of our common stock could decline.

Under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (our "charter"), the UWWH Stockholder, Bain Capital

Fund VII, L.P. and their respective affiliates and, in some circumstances, any of our directors and officers who is also a
director, officer, employee, member or partner of the UWWH Stockholder, Bain Capital Fund VII, L.P. and their
respective affiliates, have no obligation to offer us corporate opportunities.

The policies relating to corporate opportunities and transactions with the UWWH Stockholder, Bain Capital Fund VII,
L.P. and their respective affiliates set forth in our charter address potential conflicts of interest between us, on the one hand,
and the UWWH Stockholder, Bain Capital Fund VII, L.P., their respective affiliates and their respective officers and directors
who are directors or officers of our company, on the other hand. Although these provisions are designed to resolve conflicts
between us and the UWWH Stockholder, Bain Capital Fund VII, L.P. and their respective affiliates fairly, conflicts may not
be so resolved.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter and amended and restated by-laws (our "by-laws") could discourage, delay

or prevent a change of control of our company and may affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our charter and by-laws include a number of provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our

management or control over us that shareholders may consider favorable. For example, our charter and by-laws collectively:

•

•
•

•

authorize the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to thwart a
takeover attempt;
limit the ability of shareholders to remove directors;
provide that vacancies on our board of directors, including vacancies resulting from an enlargement of our board of
directors, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office;
prohibit shareholders from calling special meetings of shareholders unless called by the holders of not less than 20%
of our outstanding shares of common stock;
prohibit shareholder action by written consent, unless initiated by the holders of not less than 20% of the outstanding
shares of common stock;
establish advance notice requirements for nominations of candidates for election as directors or to bring other
business before an annual meeting of our shareholders; and
require the approval of holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock to amend our
by-laws and certain provisions of our charter.

These provisions may prevent our shareholders from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our

common stock offered by a bidder in a takeover context. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these
provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if the provisions are viewed as
discouraging takeover attempts in the future.

Our charter and by-laws may also make it difficult for shareholders to replace or remove our management. These

provisions may facilitate management entrenchment that may delay, deter, render more difficult or prevent a change in our
control, which may not be in the best interests of our shareholders.

We have not historically paid dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on

your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We have not historically declared or paid dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to invest our future

earnings, if any, to fund our growth, to develop our business, for working capital needs, to reduce debt and for general
corporate purposes. Therefore, the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future
appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain
their current value.

Any decision to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of Veritiv's Board of Directors and will depend

upon various factors then existing, including earnings, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, level of
indebtedness, restrictions imposed by applicable law, general business conditions and other factors that Veritiv's Board of
Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our operations are conducted almost entirely through our subsidiaries. As such, to
the extent that we determine in the future to pay dividends on our common stock, none of our subsidiaries will be obligated to
make funds available to us for the payment of dividends. Further, the agreements governing our ABL Facility can, and

agreements governing future indebtedness may, in certain circumstances, restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay
dividends or otherwise transfer assets to us.

Our charter designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain litigation
that may be initiated by our shareholders, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum
for disputes with us.

Our charter provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any
derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed to
us or our shareholders by any of our directors, officers, employees or agents, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us
arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the
internal affairs doctrine. The choice of forum provision in our charter may limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a
favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2017, we had a distribution network operating from approximately 170 distribution centers.

Properties

Square feet (in
millions)

Leased

Owned

Total

160

18.1

1.3

170

19.4

These facilities are strategically located throughout the U.S., Canada and Mexico in order to efficiently serve our

customer base in the surrounding areas while also facilitating expedited delivery services for special orders. We continually
evaluate location, size and attributes to maximize efficiency, deliver top quality customer service and achieve economies of
scale.

The Company also leases various office spaces for corporate and sales functions.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, and regulatory and administrative

proceedings arising out of its business relating to general commercial and contractual matters, governmental regulations,
intellectual property rights, labor and employment matters, tax and other actions.

Although the ultimate outcome of any legal proceeding or investigation cannot be predicted with certainty, based on
present information, including the Company's assessment of the merits of the particular claim, the Company does not expect
that any asserted or unasserted legal claims or proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse
effect on its cash flow, results of operations or financial condition.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Veritiv's common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol VRTV. As

of February 23, 2018, there were 5,904 shareholders of record. The number of record holders does not include shareholders
who are beneficial owners, but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.

The following table sets forth, for the quarterly reporting periods indicated, the high and low market prices per share

for the Company's common stock, as reported on the NYSE.

2017

2016

High

Low

High

Low

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

62.60

53.25

45.40

33.70

48.95

39.30

26.85

20.35

39.23

42.25

52.49

56.70

27.44

34.10

37.05

43.00

Veritiv has not historically paid dividends on its common stock. The Company currently intends to invest its future

earnings, if any, to fund its growth, to develop its business, for working capital needs, to reduce debt and for general

corporate purposes. Any payment of dividends will be at the discretion of Veritiv's Board of Directors and will depend upon
various factors then existing, including earnings, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, level of
indebtedness, contractual restrictions with respect to payment of dividends, restrictions imposed by applicable law, general
business conditions and other factors that Veritiv's Board of Directors may deem relevant.

On November 23, 2016, the UWWH Stockholder, one of Veritiv's existing stockholders and the former parent

company of Unisource Worldwide, Inc., sold 1.76 million shares of Veritiv common stock in an underwritten public offering.
Concurrently with the closing of the offering, Veritiv repurchased 0.31 million of these offered shares from the underwriters
at a price of $42.8625 per share, which is the price at which the underwriters purchased such shares from the selling
stockholder, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $13.4 million. The Company may repurchase additional shares
in the future, however, there is currently no share repurchase authorization plan approved by the Company's Board of
Directors.

On March 22, 2017, the UWWH Stockholder sold 1.80 million shares of Veritiv common stock in a block trade.

The Company did not sell or repurchase any shares and did not receive any of the proceeds.

The UWWH Stockholder beneficially owned 4,283,840 shares of Veritiv's outstanding common stock as of

December 31, 2017.

Performance Graph

The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the Company's common stock

to the returns of the Russell 2000 Index and the average performance of a group consisting of the Company's peer companies
(the "Peer Group") based on total shareholder return from June 18, 2014 (the first day Veritiv's common stock began "when-
issued" trading on the NYSE) through December 31, 2017. Companies included in the Peer Group are as follows:

• Anixter International Inc.

• Genuine Parts Company

• Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.

• Graphic Packaging Holding Company

• Resolute Forest Products Inc.
• ScanSource, Inc.

• Arrow Electronics, Inc.

• InnerWorkings Inc.

• Sealed Air Corporation

• Avery Dennison Corporation

• International Paper Company

• Sonoco Products Company

• Avnet, Inc.

• Kaman Corporation

• Staples, Inc.

• Bemis Company, Inc.

• KapStone Paper and Packaging

• W.W. Grainger, Inc.

• Brady Corporation

• Deluxe Corporation

• Domtar Corporation

• Ennis Inc.
• Essendant Inc.

• Fastenal Company

Corporation

• MSC Industrial Direct Co. Inc.

• WESCO International Inc.

• WestRock Company

• Neenah Paper, Inc.

• Office Depot, Inc.

• Packaging Corporation of America
• PH Glatfelter Company

• R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company

The graph is not, and is not intended to be, indicative of future performance of our common stock. The graph

assumes $100 invested on June 18, 2014 in the Company, the Russell 2000 Index and the Peer Group. Total return indices
reflect reinvestment of dividends and are weighted on the basis of market capitalization at the time of each reported data
point.

Comparison of 43 Month Cumulative Total Return
Among Veritiv Corporation, the Russell 2000 Index and Peer Group

Veritiv Corporation

Russell 2000 Index

Peer Group

$160

$150

$140

$130

$120

$110

$100

$90

$80

$70

$60

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents the selected historical consolidated financial data for Veritiv and should be read in
conjunction with Item 7 of this report and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in
Item 8 of this report. The Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015 and the Consolidated Balance Sheets data as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 set forth below are derived from the
audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.

The Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations data for the year ended December 31, 2014 is derived

from Veritiv's audited Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements for 2014 and the Consolidated Balance Sheets data
as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are derived from Veritiv's audited Consolidated Financial Statements for 2015. These
financial statements are not included in this report. The Combined Statements of Operations data for the year ended
December 31, 2013 and the Combined Balance Sheets data as of December 31, 2013 are derived from xpedx's audited
Combined Financial Statements for 2013 which are not included in this report.

The financial information may not be indicative of Veritiv's future performance and the financial information
presented for the years prior to 2015 does not necessarily reflect what the financial condition and results of operations would
have been had Veritiv operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during those periods.

(in millions, except per share data)

Statements of Operations Data

2017

As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
2014(1)

2016

2015

2013

Net sales

Cost of products sold

Distribution expenses

Selling and administrative expenses

Depreciation and amortization

Acquisition, integration and merger expenses

Restructuring charges, net

Operating income (loss)

Income tax expense (benefit)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

Income (loss) from discontinued operations,

net of income taxes

Net income (loss)

Earnings (loss) per share(2):

Basic

Continuing operations

Discontinued operations

Basic earnings (loss) per share

Diluted

Continuing operations

Discontinued operations

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

Balance Sheets Data (at period end)

8,364.7

8,326.6

8,717.7

7,406.5

$ 5,652.4

6,846.6

516.9

872.6

54.2

36.5

16.7

21.2

11.4

(13.3)

—

(13.3)

(0.85) $

—

(0.85) $

—

(0.85) $

6,826.4

505.1

826.2

7,160.3

521.8

853.9

54.7

25.9

12.4

75.9

19.8

21.0

—

21.0

1.31

—

1.31

1.30

—

1.30

56.9

34.9

11.3

78.6

18.2

26.7

—

26.7

1.67

—

1.67

—

1.67

6,180.9

4,736.8

426.2

689.1

37.6

75.1

4.0
(6.4)

(2.1)
(19.5)

(0.1)
(19.6)

314.2

548.2

17.1

—

37.9
(1.8)

0.4

0.0

0.2

(1.61) $
(0.01)
(1.62) $

0.00

0.02

(1.61) $
(0.01)
(1.62) $

0.00

0.02

Accounts receivable, net

1,174.3

1,048.3

1,037.5

1,115.1

$ 669.7

Inventories

Total assets

Long-term debt, net of current maturities
Financing obligations, less current portion

Defined benefit pension obligations

722.7

2,708.4

908.3
181.6

24.4

707.9

2,483.7

749.2
176.1

27.6

720.6

2,476.9

800.5
197.8

28.7

673.2

360.9

2,574.5

1,256.9

855.0
212.4

36.3

—
—

—

Other non-current liabilities
(1) Includes the operating results of Unisource for the six months ended December 31, 2014.
(2) See Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion about the shares of common stock utilized in the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

105.6

121.2

137.0

107.2

12.5

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition should be read in

conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included elsewhere in this report.

Executive Overview

Business Overview

Veritiv is a leading North American business-to-business distributor of packaging, facility solutions, print and
publishing products and services. Additionally, Veritiv provides logistics and supply chain management solutions to its
customers. On August 31, 2017, Veritiv completed its acquisition of 100% of the equity interest in various All American
Containers entities (collectively, "AAC"), a family owned and operated distributor of rigid packaging, including plastic, glass
and metal containers, caps, closures and plastic pouches. The Company operates from approximately 170 distribution centers
primarily throughout the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Veritiv's business is organized under four reportable segments: Packaging, Facility Solutions, Print, and Publishing

• Packaging – The Packaging segment provides standard as well as custom and comprehensive packaging solutions for
customers based in North America and in key global markets. The business is strategically focused on higher growth
industries including light industrial/general manufacturing, food production, fulfillment and internet retail, as well as
niche verticals based on geographical and functional expertise. Veritiv’s packaging professionals create customer
value through supply chain solutions, structural and graphic packaging design and engineering, automation, workflow
and equipment services and kitting and fulfillment.

• Facility Solutions – The Facility Solutions segment sources and sells cleaning, break-room and other supplies such as
towels, tissues, wipers and dispensers, can liners, commercial cleaning chemicals, soaps and sanitizers, sanitary
maintenance supplies and equipment, safety and hazard supplies, and shampoos and amenities primarily in the U.S.,
Canada and Mexico. Veritiv is a leading distributor in the Facility Solutions segment. Through this segment we
manage a world class network of leading suppliers in most facilities solutions categories. Additionally, we offer total
cost of ownership solutions with re-merchandising, budgeting and compliance reporting, inventory management, and
a sales-force trained to bring leading vertical expertise to the major North American geographies.

• Print – The Print segment sells and distributes commercial printing, writing, copying, digital, wide format and

specialty paper products, graphics consumables and graphics equipment primarily in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
This segment also includes customized paper conversion services of commercial printing paper for distribution to
document centers and form printers. The Company's broad geographic platform of operations coupled with the
breadth of paper and graphics products, including its exclusive private brand offerings, provides a foundation to
service national, regional and local customers across North America.

• Publishing – The Publishing segment sells and distributes coated and uncoated commercial printing papers to

The Company also has a Corporate & Other category which includes certain assets and costs not primarily
attributable to any of the reportable segments, as well as its Veritiv logistics solutions business which provides transportation
and warehousing solutions.

Results of Operations, Including Business Segments

The following discussion compares the consolidated operating results of Veritiv for the years ended December 31,

2017, 2016 and 2015.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Year Ended December 31,

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

(in millions)

Net sales

2017

2016

$ 8,364.7

$ 8,326.6

2015
$ 8,717.7

Cost of products sold (exclusive of depreciation and

amortization shown separately below)

6,846.6

6,826.4

7,160.3

Distribution expenses

Selling and administrative expenses

Depreciation and amortization

Acquisition and integration expenses

Restructuring charges, net

Operating income

Interest expense, net

Other (income) expense, net

Income (loss) before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income (loss)

Net Sales

516.9

872.6

54.2

36.5

16.7
21.2

31.2
(8.1)
(1.9)
11.4
(13.3) $

505.1

826.2

521.8

853.9

54.7

25.9

12.4
75.9

27.5

7.6

40.8

19.8

21.0

56.9

34.9

11.3
78.6

27.0

6.7

44.9

18.2

26.7

Increase
(Decrease) %

0.5 %

0.3 %

2.3 %

5.6 %

(0.9)%

40.9 %

34.7 %
(72.1)%

13.5 %

(206.6)%

(104.7)%

(42.4)%

(163.3)%

(4.5)%

(4.7)%

(3.2)%

(3.9)%

(25.8)%

9.7 %
(3.4)%

1.9 %

13.4 %

(9.1)%

8.8 %

(21.3)%

•

2017 compared to 2016: Net sales increased by $38.1 million, or 0.5%, primarily due to the incremental net sales of
$71.7 million resulting from the AAC acquisition. Increases in net sales in the Packaging and Facility Solutions
segments as well as Veritiv's logistics solutions business were offset by declines in the Print and Publishing segments.
See the “Segment Results” section for additional discussion.

2016 compared to 2015: Net sales declined by $391.1 million, or 4.5%, primarily due to declines in the Print and
Publishing segments. See the “Segment Results” section for additional discussion.

Cost of Products Sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)

•

2017 compared to 2016: Cost of products sold increased by $20.2 million, or 0.3%, due to the growth in net sales as
previously discussed. See the “Segment Results” section for additional discussion.

2016 compared to 2015: Cost of products sold decreased by $333.9 million, or 4.7%, primarily due to the decline in
net sales as previously discussed. See the “Segment Results” section for additional discussion.

Distribution Expenses

•

2017 compared to 2016: Distribution expenses increased by $11.8 million or 2.3%. Distribution expenses increased
$12.2 million from an increase in freight and logistics expenses, primarily due to increased third-party freight, transfer
expenses and diesel fuel prices and $4.9 million related to the AAC acquisition. These increases were partially offset
by (i) a $1.7 million decrease in facilities rent and other related expenses, (ii) a $1.5 million decrease in insurance
expense and (iii) a $1.6 million decrease in personnel expenses as well as maintenance and material expense. The
offsetting decreases were primarily driven by warehouse consolidations.

2016 compared to 2015: Distribution expenses decreased by $16.7 million or 3.2%. The decline was primarily due to
(i) a $6.3 million decrease in facilities expenses due primarily to warehouse consolidations, (ii) a $5.9 million decrease
in personnel costs due primarily to reductions in temporary employee expense and (iii) a $5.3 million decrease in
vehicle operating expenses primarily driven by reductions in third-party freight expense and fuel.

Selling and Administrative Expenses

•

2017 compared to 2016: Selling and administrative expenses increased by $46.4 million or 5.6%. The increase was
primarily attributed to (i) an $18.8 million increase in personnel expenses, (ii) a $13.3 million increase in bad debt
expense and (iii) a $9.3 million increase related to the AAC acquisition. The increase in personnel expenses was
primarily driven by an increase in headcount to support the Company's growth strategy as well as lower commissions
in 2016 due to the recovery of commission advances, discussed below. The increase in bad debt expense was
primarily due to additional reserves related to certain customers with declining financial conditions during 2017
combined with favorable collections experience in 2016. Selling and administrative expenses also included $8.4
million of impairment charges related to the impairment of the logistics solutions business goodwill and customer
relationship intangible asset.

2016 compared to 2015: Selling and administrative expenses decreased by $27.7 million or 3.2%. The decrease was
primarily attributed to (i) an $11.2 million decrease in commission expense due in part to lower net sales volume and
(ii) a $13.6 million decrease in incentive compensation. In 2013, xpedx advanced funds to commissioned sales
representatives to compensate them for a change in the timing of commission payments. During 2016, the Company
recovered $6.0 million of those advances, which further reduced commission expense. These decreases were partially
offset by $5.8 million of impairment charges attributable to the Print and Publishing segments' customer relationship
intangible assets.

Depreciation and Amortization

•

2017 compared to 2016: Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $0.5 million.

2016 compared to 2015: Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $2.2 million primarily due to $2.4 million
of amortization for intangible assets acquired in the Merger that were fully amortized as of June 30, 2015.

Acquisition and Integration Expenses

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, Veritiv incurred costs and charges to integrate its

combined businesses. Integration expenses include internally dedicated integration management resources, retention
compensation, information technology conversion costs, rebranding, professional services and other costs to integrate its
businesses. Veritiv incurred acquisition and integration expenses of $8.0 million in 2017 related to the acquisition of AAC.

See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of these costs.

Restructuring Charges, Net

Restructuring charges, net relates primarily to Veritiv's restructuring of its North American operations intended to

integrate the legacy xpedx and Unisource operations, generate cost savings and capture synergies across the combined
company. Restructuring charges, net includes net gains related to the sale or exit of certain facilities totaling $24.4 million and
$2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and a $4.1 million net non-cash loss from asset
impairments for the year ended December 31, 2015. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional details. The Company may continue to record restructuring charges in the future as these activities progress, which
may include gains or losses from the disposition of assets.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net in 2017 consisted of (i) $25.5 million of interest expense on the Company’s asset-based lending
facility (the “ABL Facility”), (ii) $2.6 million for amortization of deferred financing costs related to the ABL Facility and (iii)
$3.1 million in miscellaneous interest expense. Interest expense, net in 2017 increased $ 3.7 million. Interest expense increased
due to (i) an increased average balance on the ABL Facility and (ii) increased interest rates. See Note 5 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the ABL Facility. The increased average balance and interest rates
on the ABL Facility were primarily due to the acquisition of AAC on August 31, 2017. See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional details.

Interest expense, net in 2016 consisted of (i) $18.6 million of interest expense on the ABL Facility, (ii) $5.6 million for

amortization of deferred financing costs related to the ABL Facility and (iii) $3.3 million in miscellaneous interest expense.
The increase in 2016 was due primarily to an additional $1.9 million of deferred financing cost amortization resulting from an
amendment to the ABL Facility. This increase was offset by lower miscellaneous interest expense.

Interest expense, net in 2015 consisted of (i) $18.7 million of interest expense on the ABL Facility, (ii) $4.4 million for

amortization of deferred financing costs related to the ABL Facility and (iii) $3.9 million in miscellaneous interest expense.

Other (Income) Expense, Net

•

2017 compared to 2016: Other (income) expense, net was income of $8.1 million in 2017 compared to expense of
$7.6 million in 2016. The $15.7 million change is primarily the result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act")
which lowered the U.S. corporate federal tax rate, from 35% to 21%. The lower rate reduced the value of the Tax
Receivable Agreement liability by $13.5 million which was recorded as other income in the fourth quarter of 2017.
See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details regarding the Tax Act.

2016 compared to 2015: Other (income) expense, net increased $0.9 million compared to 2015. This increase was
primarily driven by higher expenses associated with the Tax Receivable Agreement and a loss on debt extinguishment
that were partially offset by lower expenses associated with foreign currency losses in 2016 compared to 2015.

Effective Tax Rate

Veritiv's effective tax rates were (600.0)%, 48.5% and 40.5% for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 is impacted by a near break-even pre-tax
book loss in combination with the impact of the following discrete items:

• A $30.2 million expense in connection with our provisional estimate of the impact of the Tax Act, including $23.0

million for the remeasurement of our deferred taxes and $7.2 million for the one-time transition tax. See Note 8 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details regarding the Tax Act.

• A $13.4 million benefit for the reversal of the valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets of the Company’s

Canadian subsidiary. The reversal reflects the Company’s cumulative recent income and improved expectation of
future taxable income.

• A $3.8 million tax rate benefit for the reduction in the fair value of the Tax Receivable Agreement, including the

federal rate reduction.

• A $3.1 million benefit in conjunction with the third quarter 2017 filing of Veritiv’s 2016 U.S. federal tax return and

amended 2015 and 2014 U.S. federal tax returns for credits related to foreign taxes and research and experimentation
activities.

• A tax rate effect of $2.1 million for the impact of impairing non-deductible goodwill.

In addition to the above items, the difference between the Company’s effective tax rates for the years ended December

31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35% includes the impact of non-deductible expenses, state income
taxes (net of federal income tax benefit), the Company's income (loss) by jurisdiction, the tax effect of Tax Receivable
Agreement changes, and changes in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. The year ended December 31, 2015
also includes the tax impact of a foreign exchange loss and an impairment of non-deductible goodwill.

The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that affected our income taxes in 2017 as well as
changes that will affect us beginning in 2018. The volatility of the Company's effective tax rate has been primarily due to both
the level of pre-tax income as well as variations in the Company's income (loss) by jurisdiction. Additionally, uncertainty
related to the future impact of the Tax Act may increase effective tax rate volatility. Pending further evaluation of the Tax Act,
over time and with increasing pre-tax income, the Company estimates its effective tax rate will trend toward approximately
26%. However, the effective tax rate may vary significantly due to potential fluctuations in the amount and source, including
both foreign and domestic, of pre-tax income and changes in amounts of non-deductible expenses and other items that could
impact the effective tax rate. See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

Segment Results

Adjusted EBITDA is the primary financial performance measure Veritiv uses to manage its businesses, to monitor its

results of operations, to measure its performance against the ABL Facility and to incentivize its management. This common
metric is intended to align shareholders, debt holders and management. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure
and is not an alternative to net income, operating income or any other measure prescribed by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP").

Veritiv uses Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, restructuring

charges, net, acquisition and integration expenses and other similar charges including any severance costs, costs associated with
warehouse and office openings or closings, consolidation, and relocation and other business optimization expenses, stock-based
compensation expense, changes in the LIFO reserve, non-restructuring asset impairment charges, non-restructuring severance

charges, non-restructuring pension charges, fair value adjustments related to contingent liabilities assumed in mergers and
acquisitions and certain other adjustments) because Veritiv believes investors commonly use Adjusted EBITDA as a key
financial metric for valuing companies. In addition, the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility permits the Company to
exclude these and other charges in calculating Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the ABL Facility.

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for

analysis of Veritiv’s results as reported under U.S. GAAP. For example, Adjusted EBITDA:

• Does not reflect the Company’s income tax expenses or the cash requirements to pay its taxes; and
• Although depreciation and amortization charges are non-cash charges, it does not reflect that the assets being

depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and the foregoing metrics do not reflect any
cash requirements for such replacements.

Other companies in the industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than Veritiv does, limiting its usefulness

as a comparative measure. Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of
discretionary cash available to Veritiv to invest in the growth of its business. Veritiv compensates for these limitations by
relying both on the Company's U.S. GAAP results and by using Adjusted EBITDA for supplemental purposes. Additionally,
Adjusted EBITDA is not an alternative measure of financial performance under U.S. GAAP and therefore should be considered
in conjunction with net income and other performance measures such as operating income or net cash provided by operating
activities and not as an alternative to such U.S. GAAP measures.

Due to the shared nature of the distribution network, distribution expenses are not a specific charge to each segment

but are instead allocated to each segment based primarily on operational metrics that correlate with changes in volume.
Accordingly, distribution expenses allocated to each segment are highly interdependent on the results of other segments. Lower
volume in any segment that is not offset by a reduction in distribution expenses can result in the other segments absorbing a
larger share of distribution expenses. Conversely, higher volume in any segment can result in the other segments absorbing a
smaller share of distribution expenses. The impact of this at the segment level is that the changes in distribution expense trends
may not correspond with volume trends within a particular segment.

The Company sells thousands of products. In the Packaging, Facility Solutions and Print segments, Veritiv is unable

to compute the impact of changes in net sales volume based on changes in net sales of each individual product. Rather, the
Company assumes that the margin stays constant and estimates the volume impact based on changes in cost of products sold as
a proxy for the change in net sales volume. After any other significant net sales variances are identified, the remaining net sales
variance is attributed to price/mix.

The Company approximates foreign currency effects by applying the foreign currency exchange rate for the prior

period to the local currency results for the current period. We believe the elimination of the foreign currency translation impact
provides better year-to-year comparability without the distortion of foreign currency fluctuations.

The Company believes that the decline in the demand for paper and related products is due to the widespread use of
electronic media and permanent product substitution, more e-commerce, less print advertising, fewer catalogs and a reduced
volume of direct mail, among other factors. This trend is expected to continue and will place continued pressure on the
Company’s revenues and profit margins and make it more difficult to maintain or grow Adjusted EBITDA within the Print and
Publishing segments.

Included in the following table are net sales and Adjusted EBITDA for each of the reportable segments and Corporate

& Other:

(in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA as a %
of net sales

Year Ended December 31,
2016
Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA as a %
of net sales

Year Ended December 31,
2015
Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA as a %
of net sales

Packaging

Facility
Solutions

Publishing

Corporate &
Other

3,157.8

238.0

7.5%

2,854.2

221.2

7.7%

2,829.9

212.6

1,309.7

35.5

2.7%

1,271.6

47.0

3.7%

1,289.3

41.7

2,793.7

60.8

2.2%

3,047.4

76.8

2.5%

3,271.8

79.0

958.0

26.4

2.8%

1,033.6

23.6

2.3%

1,215.5

34.7

7.5%

3.2%

2.4%

2.9%

145.5
(184.3)

119.8
(176.4)

111.2
(186.0)

* - not meaningful

See Note 17, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to Adjusted

EBITDA, including a reconciliation of income (loss) before income taxes as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations to Adjusted EBITDA for reportable segments.

Packaging

The table below presents selected data with respect to the Packaging segment:

(in millions)

Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA

Year Ended December 31,

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

2017

3,157.8

238.0

2016

2,854.2

221.2

2015

2,829.9

212.6

Increase
(Decrease) %

10.6%

7.6%

0.9%

4.0%

Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net sales

7.5%

7.7%

7.5%

The table below presents the components of the net sales change compared to the prior year:

(in millions)

Volume

Foreign currency
Price/Mix

Increase (Decrease)

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

315.0

3.3
(14.7)
303.6

50.3
(21.8)
(4.2)
24.3

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Net sales increased $303.6 million, or 10.6%, compared to 2016. The net sales increase was primarily attributable to

an increase in net sales of corrugated products, films and tertiary packaging items due to increases in volume and market prices
as well as $71.7 million of rigid packaging product net sales in 2017 relating to the AAC acquisition.

Adjusted EBITDA increased $16.8 million, or 7.6%, compared to 2016 primarily due to increased net sales volume.

The increase in net sales was partially offset by (i) cost of products sold increasing at a faster rate than net sales, (ii) a $25.0
million increase in distribution expenses and (iii) an $18.7 million increase in selling and administrative expenses. The increase
in distribution expenses was primarily driven by increased utilization of the distribution network, which is reflected in (i)
increased freight and logistics expenses driven primarily by increased third-party freight, transfer expenses and diesel fuel
prices, (ii) increased personnel expenses and (iii) increased facilities rent and other related expenses. The increase in selling and
administrative expenses was primarily driven by higher personnel expenses associated with increased headcount to support our
growth strategy. The AAC acquisition resulted in a $4.9 million increase in distribution expenses and a $9.4 million increase in
selling and administrative expenses.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

The net sales increase was primarily attributable to an increase in net sales of corrugated products.

The Adjusted EBITDA increase was primarily due to increased net sales volume, and $3.4 million attributed to cost of
products sold increasing at a slower rate than net sales. These improvements were partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in
selling, general, and administrative personnel costs primarily attributable to the addition of new sales representatives.

Facility Solutions

The table below presents selected data with respect to the Facility Solutions segment:

Year Ended December 31,

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

(in millions)

Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net sales

2017

1,309.7

35.5

2.7%

2016

1,271.6

47.0

3.7%

2015

1,289.3

41.7

3.2%

Increase
(Decrease) %

3.0 %

(24.5)%

(1.4)%

12.7 %

The table below presents the components of the net sales change compared to the prior year:

(in millions)

Volume

Foreign currency
Price/Mix

Increase (Decrease)

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

43.1

5.1
(10.1)
38.1

(5.6)
(9.2)
(2.9)
(17.7)

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Net sales increased $38.1 million, or 3.0%, compared to 2016. The net sales increase was primarily attributable to

increased net sales of food service products, safety supplies, chemicals, towels and tissues.

Adjusted EBITDA decreased $11.5 million, or 24.5%, compared to 2016. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA was

primarily driven by (i) cost of products sold increasing at a faster rate than net sales, (ii) a $6.9 million increase in distribution
expenses and (iii) a $5.6 million increase in selling and administrative costs, partially offset by an increase in net sales. The
increase in distribution expenses was primarily driven by increased utilization of the distribution network and is evidenced in (i)
increased freight and logistics expenses driven primarily by increased third-party freight, transfer expenses and diesel fuel
prices and (ii) increased personnel expenses. The increase in selling and administrative expenses was primarily driven by (i) an
increase in personnel expenses primarily due to increased headcount to support our growth strategy and (ii) an increase in bad
debt expense.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

The net sales decrease was primarily attributable to (i) foreign currency effects, (ii) strategic decisions to exit certain

unprofitable customer relationships in 2015 and (iii) pricing pressure.

The Adjusted EBITDA improvement was primarily due to (i) cost of products sold decreasing at a faster rate than net

sales and (ii) a $3.5 million decrease in selling and administrative costs. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses
was primarily driven by (i) a decrease in commissions due to lower net sales volume, (ii) a decrease in bad debt expense due to
favorable collections experience and (iii) a reduction in personnel costs.

The table below presents selected data with respect to the Print segment:

Year Ended December 31,

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

(in millions)

Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net sales

2017

2,793.7

60.8

2.2%

2016

3,047.4

76.8

2.5%

2015

3,271.8

79.0

2.4%

Increase
(Decrease) %

(8.3)%

(20.8)%

(6.9)%

(2.8)%

The table below presents the components of the net sales change compared to the prior year:

(in millions)

Volume

Foreign currency

Price/Mix

Increase (Decrease)

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

(256.8) $
3.5
(0.4)
(253.7) $

(225.2)
(9.2)
10.0
(224.4)

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Net sales decreased $253.7 million, or 8.3%, compared to 2016. The net sales decrease was primarily attributable to

the continued secular decline in the paper industry.

Adjusted EBITDA decreased $16.0 million, or 20.8%, compared to 2016. The Adjusted EBITDA decrease was largely
attributable to the decline in net sales. The decline in net sales was partially offset by (i) a $16.0 million decrease in distribution
expenses and (ii) a $5.2 million decrease in selling and administrative expenses. The decrease in distribution expenses was
primarily driven by decreased utilization of the distribution network, which is reflected in (i) a decrease in facilities rent and
other related expenses and (ii) a decrease in personnel expense. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses was
primarily driven by a decrease in personnel expenses and professional fees, partially offset by an increase in bad debt expense.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

The net sales decrease was primarily attributable to the continued erosion in net sales volume from the secular decline

in the paper industry as well as strategic decisions to exit certain unprofitable customer relationships.

The decline in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower net sales volume and was partially offset by a $5.4

million reduction in selling and general administrative expenses resulting from a decrease in personnel costs.

Publishing

The table below presents selected data with respect to the Publishing segment:

Year Ended December 31,

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

(in millions)

Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net sales

2017

958.0

26.4

2.8%

2016

1,033.6

23.6

2.3%

2015

1,215.5

34.7

2.9%

Increase
(Decrease) %

(7.3)%

11.9 %

(15.0)%

(32.0)%

The table below presents the components of the net sales change compared to the prior year:

(in millions)

Volume

Foreign currency
Price/Mix

Increase (Decrease)

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

(82.5) $
0.8
6.1
(75.6) $

(192.5)
(0.2)
10.8
(181.9)

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Net sales decreased $75.6 million, or 7.3%, compared to 2016. The net sales decrease was primarily attributable to a

decline in volume, reflecting the continued secular decline in the paper industry.

Adjusted EBITDA increased $2.8 million, or 11.9%, compared to 2016. The Adjusted EBITDA increase was primarily

attributable to the cost of products sold decreasing at a faster rate than net sales and a $1.9 million decrease in selling and
administrative expenses partially offset by a decrease in net sales. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses was
primarily driven by a decrease in personnel expenses.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

The net sales decrease was primarily attributable to the continued erosion in net sales volume from the continued

secular decline in the paper industry.

The decline in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower net sales volume and a $2.9 million decrease attributed to
cost of products sold decreasing at a slower rate than net sales. These declines were partially offset by a $3.6 million decrease in
selling and administrative expenses due to lower commission expense.

Corporate & Other

(in millions)

Net sales

Adjusted EBITDA

Year Ended December 31,

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

2017

2016

2015

Increase
(Decrease) %

145.5

119.8

111.2

(184.3) $

(176.4) $

(186.0)

21.5 %

(4.5)%

7.7%

5.2%

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Net sales increased $25.7 million, or 21.5%, compared to 2016. The net sales increase was primarily attributable to an

increase in freight brokerage services.

Adjusted EBITDA decreased $7.9 million, or 4.5% compared to 2016. The Adjusted EBITDA decrease was primarily

driven by (i) cost of products sold increasing at a faster rate than net sales, (ii) a $9.1 million increase in selling and
administrative costs partially offset by an increase in net sales and (iii) a $3.3 million decrease in distribution expenses. The

increase in selling and administrative costs was driven primarily by (i) an increase in personnel expenses primarily driven by
increased headcount to support the Company's growth strategy and (ii) lower commission expense in 2016 due to the recovery
of commission advances, as discussed above.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

Net sales increased $8.6 million, or 7.7%, due to continued growth in freight brokerage services.

The Adjusted EBITDA improvement was primarily due to (i) the recovery of commission advances and (ii) a decrease

in corporate personnel costs mainly attributable to a reduction in incentive compensation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The cash requirements of the Company are provided by cash flows from operations and borrowings under the ABL

Facility. The following table sets forth a summary of cash flows:

(in millions)

Net cash provided by (used for):

Operating activities

Investing activities

Financing activities

Analysis of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

36.6

140.2

113.0

(126.2)

99.2

(34.4)

(89.9)

(44.1)

(70.4)

The Company ended 2017 with $80.3 million in cash, an increase of $10.7 million during the year. Cash flow from
operations was $36.6 million in 2017 compared with $140.2 million in 2016. The factors driving cash flow from operating activities
in 2017 were: (i) a $48.3 million increase in accounts payable and related party payable, (ii) a $30.1 million decrease in inventories,
(iii) a $13.6 million increase in other accrued liabilities and (iv) a $15.3 million increase from other operating activities. The
increase in cash from operating activities was partially offset by: (i) a net loss, (ii) a $101.9 million increase in accounts receivable
and related party receivable, (iii) an $11.3 million decrease in accrued payroll and benefits and (iv) an $8.4 million increase in
other current assets. The Company also generated $167.3 million in cash flow from a net increase in revolving loan borrowings
under the ABL Facility and $51.1 million related to proceeds from asset sales. The primary uses of cash during 2017 were: (i)
$144.8 million for the acquisition of AAC, (ii) a $40.5 million decline in book overdrafts, (iii) $32.5 million for property and
equipment additions, of which $16.1 million were integration-related capital expenditures and $16.4 million were ordinary capital
expenditures, (iv) $16.4 million for payments under financing obligations including obligations to related party, (v) $8.5 million
for the Tax Receivable Agreement payment and (vi) $2.7 million for payments under capital lease obligations.

The primary sources of cash during 2016 were: (i) a $69.9 million increase in accounts payable and related party payable,
(ii) a $14.3 million increase in other operating activities and (iii) a $13.1 million reduction in inventories. The Company also
generated $18.9 million in positive cash flow from an increase in book overdrafts and $6.6 million related to proceeds from asset
sales. The primary uses of cash during 2016 were: (i) a $40.9 million decrease in accrued payroll and benefits, (ii) a $14.7 million
increase in accounts receivable and related party receivable, (iii) an $11.4 million increase in other current assets, and (iv) a $3.6
million decrease in other accrued liabilities. Cash was also used by (i) $70.1 million of net repayments of revolving loan borrowings
under the ABL Facility, (ii) $41.0 million of property and equipment additions, of which $25.5 million were integration-related
capital expenditures and $15.5 million were ordinary capital expenditures, (iii) $19.9 million of payments under financing
obligations to related party, (iv) $13.6 million used to repurchase 0.31 million shares of Veritiv outstanding common stock, (v)
$3.2 million for payments under capital lease obligations and (vi) $2.0 million for financing fees incurred in connection with an
amendment to the ABL Facility.

The primary sources of cash during 2015 were: (i) higher net income compared to 2014, (ii) a $53.4 million reduction in
accounts receivable and related party receivable, (iii) $10.5 million from an increase in accrued payroll and benefits and (iv) $3.1
million from other operating activities. The primary uses of cash during 2015 were: (i) a $62.0 million increase in inventories,
(ii) $47.0 million of net repayments of revolving loan borrowings under the ABL Facility, (iii) $44.4 million of property and
equipment additions, of which $29.4 million were integration-related capital expenditures and $15.0 million were ordinary capital
expenditures, (iv) $13.8 million of payments under financing obligations to related party, (v) an $8.4 million decrease in accounts

payable and related party payable, (vi) a $7.1 million decrease in other accrued liabilities and (vii) $3.8 million in payments under
capital lease obligations. Cash was also used for a $5.8 million decrease in book overdrafts.

Funding and Liquidity Strategy

Veritiv has a $1.4 billion asset-based lending facility (the "ABL Facility"). The ABL Facility is comprised of U.S. and
Canadian sub-facilities of $1,250.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively. The ABL Facility is available to be drawn in U.S.
dollars, in the case of the U.S. sub-facilities, and in U.S. dollars or Canadian dollars, in the case of the Canadian sub-facilities,
or in other currencies that are mutually agreeable. The Company's accounts receivable and inventories in the U.S. and Canada
are collateral under the ABL Facility.

On August 11, 2016, the Company amended the ABL Facility to, among other things, extend the maturity date to

August 11, 2021. All other significant terms remained consistent. The ABL Facility provides for the right of the individual
lenders to extend the maturity date of their respective commitments and loans upon the request of Veritiv and without the
consent of any other lenders. The ABL Facility may be prepaid at Veritiv's option at any time without premium or penalty and
is subject to mandatory prepayment if the amount outstanding under the ABL Facility exceeds either the aggregate
commitments with respect thereto or the current borrowing base, in an amount equal to such excess. The Company incurred
and deferred $2.0 million of new financing fees associated with the amendment, which are reflected in other non-current assets
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and will be amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the amended term of
the ABL Facility.

The ABL Facility has a springing minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 on a trailing four-
quarter basis, which will be tested only when specified availability is less than limits outlined under the ABL Facility. At
December 31, 2017 the above test was not applicable and is not expected to be applicable in the next 12 months.

Availability under the ABL Facility is determined based upon a monthly borrowing base calculation which includes

eligible customer receivables and inventory, less outstanding borrowings, letters of credit and certain designated reserves. As of
December 31, 2017, the available additional borrowing capacity under the ABL Facility was approximately $316.5 million.

Under the terms of the ABL Facility, interest rates are based upon LIBOR or the prime rate plus a margin rate, or in the

case of Canada, a banker’s acceptance rate or base rate plus a margin rate. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, the weighted-average borrowing interest rate was 3.3% and 2.5%, respectively.

On November 23, 2016, the UWWH Stockholder sold 1.76 million shares of Veritiv common stock in an underwritten
public offering. Veritiv did not receive any of the proceeds. Concurrently with the closing of the offering, Veritiv repurchased
0.31 million of these offered shares from the underwriters at a price of $42.8625 per share, which is the price at which the
underwriters purchased such shares from the selling stockholder, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $13.4
million. In conjunction with these transactions, Veritiv incurred approximately $0.8 million in transaction-related fees, of
which approximately $0.2 million was recorded as part of the cost to acquire the treasury stock and the remainder was included
in selling and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Veritiv's ability to fund its capital needs will depend on its ongoing ability to generate cash from operations,
borrowings under the ABL Facility and funds received from capital markets offerings. If Veritiv's cash flows from operating
activities are lower than expected, the Company will need to borrow under the ABL Facility and may need to incur additional
debt or issue additional equity. Although management believes that the arrangements currently in place will permit Veritiv to
finance its operations on acceptable terms and conditions, the Company’s access to, and the availability of, financing on
acceptable terms and conditions in the future will be impacted by many factors, including the liquidity of the overall capital
markets and the current state of the economy.

Veritiv's management expects that the Company's primary future cash needs will be for working capital, capital

expenditures, contractual commitments and strategic investments. Additionally, management expects that cash provided by
operating activities and available capacity under the ABL Facility will provide sufficient funds to operate the business and meet
other liquidity needs.

Through December 31, 2017, the Company incurred approximately $221 million in costs and charges associated with

achieving anticipated cost savings and other synergies from the Merger, including approximately $82 million for capital
expenditures and $25 million related to the complete or partial withdrawal from various multi-employer pension plans. The
Company anticipates that it will incur additional costs and charges associated with the Merger. The Company is not able to

quantify the total amount of these costs and charges or the period in which they will be incurred as the operating plans affecting
these costs are evolving and charges relating to the withdrawal from multi-employer pension plans which have not yet been
finalized, are uncertain. Excluding the multi-employer pension plan withdrawal charges, we currently anticipate that total costs
associated with the Merger will be approximately $225 to $250 million through December 31, 2018, including approximately
$90 million for capital expenditures, primarily consisting of information technology infrastructure, systems integration and
planning. Ordinary capital expenditures for 2018 are expected to be in the range of $20 million to $30 million, with another
$10 million to $20 million of integration-related capital expenditures during 2018.

All of the cash held by our non-U.S. subsidiaries is available for general corporate purposes. Veritiv considers the
earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries to be permanently invested outside the United States on the basis of estimates that
future domestic cash generation will be sufficient to meet future domestic cash needs and management's specific plans for
reinvestment of those subsidiary earnings. The table below summarizes the Company's cash positions as of December 31, 2017
and 2016:

(in millions)

Cash held in the U.S.

Cash held in foreign subsidiaries
Total Cash

As of December 31,

2017

2016

64.0

16.3
80.3

57.6

12.0
69.6

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Veritiv does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2017, other than the Other lease type

obligations included in the contractual obligations table below and the letters of credit under the ABL Facility. The Company
does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect
on its financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

The table below summarizes the Company's contractual and certain other long-term obligations as of December 31,

2017:

Payment Due by Period

4.0

6.3

3.7

3.5

9.9

3.3

8.8

4.3

34.3

18.7

94.1

18.3

2018

Total

103.5

150.5

483.7

135.6

59.3
4.9

29.6
2.6

After 2022

2019 – 2020

2021 – 2022

915.8
3.9

(in millions)
Equipment capital lease obligations (1)
Financing obligations (including obligations to
related party) (1,2)
Other lease type obligations (3)
ABL Facility (4)
Deferred compensation (5)
Tax Receivable Agreement contingent liability (6)
AAC contingent liability(7)
Multi-employer pension plan ("MEPP")
withdrawal obligations (8)
Federal income tax liability (9)
Total
$
(1) Equipment capital lease obligations and financing obligations include amounts classified as interest.
(2) Financing obligations will not result in cash payments in excess of amounts reported above. At the end of the lease terms, the net remaining financing
obligations of $155.2 million and $10.6 million will be settled by the return of the assets to the Purchaser/Landlord for the related party and non-related party
obligations, respectively.
(3) Amounts shown are presented net of contractual sublease rental income.
(4) The ABL Facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate after August 11, 2021. Interest payments included here were estimated using a
simple interest method based on the year-end December 31, 2017 ABL Facility outstanding balance of $897.7 million and its corresponding year-end weighted-
average interest rate of 3.3%. The 2021 payment amount shown above includes an estimated $897.7 million of principal balance.
(5) The deferred compensation obligation relates to Unisource's legacy deferred compensation plans and reflects gross cash payment amounts due.
(6) The Tax Receivable Agreement contingent liability reflects gross contingent obligation amounts excluding interest due to related party.
(7) The AAC contingent liability reflects the fair value of the estimated amount to be paid. The maximum amount payable is $50.0 million, payable in up to
$25.0 million increments at the first and second anniversaries of the acquisition of AAC on August 31, 2017.
(8) The MEPP withdrawal obligations include final gross unpaid charges for one plan where a determination has been issued.
(9) The federal income tax liability reflects amounts payable over eight years resulting from the transition tax implemented in the Tax Act.

1,004.7
20.6

—
9.2

1,043.3

1,663.0

206.3

167.3

246.1

13.3

24.2

57.7

25.5

12.4

17.1

0.5

6.2

7.1

9.9

1.3

1.0

0.7

3.7

9.9

1.4

1.0

—

The table above does not include future expected Company contributions to its pension plans nor does it include future

expected payments related to the complete or partial withdrawals from various multi-employer pension plans where final
determinations have not been made. Information related to the amounts of these future payments is described in Note 10 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The table above also excludes the liability for uncertain tax positions and for the
Veritiv Deferred Compensation Savings Plan as the Company cannot predict with reasonable certainty the timing of future cash
outflows associated with these liabilities. As a result of the Merger, International Paper has a potential earn-out payment of up
to $100.0 million that would become due in 2020. The potential earn-out payment would be reflected by Veritiv as a reduction
to equity at the time of payment. Due to the uncertainty of achievement, that potential payment is not included in the table
above.

See Note 1, Note 2, Note 5, Note 7, Note 10 and Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for

additional information related to these obligations.

The Company has recorded undiscounted charges related to the complete or partial withdrawal from various multi-

employer pension plans. Charges not related to the Company's restructuring efforts are recorded as distribution expense. Initial
amounts are recorded as other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See the table below for a summary of
the net charges and the year-end balance sheet liability positions for the respective years ended December 31:

(in millions)

2017

2016

(in millions)

2017

2016

Year Ended December 31,

Restructuring
charges, net

Distribution expenses

Total Net Charges

17.4

7.5

At December 31,

2.1

2.3

19.5

9.8

Other accrued
liabilities

Other non-current
liabilities

0.7

0.0

27.2

9.8

See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding these restructuring
efforts. Final charges for these withdrawals will not be known until the plans issue their respective determinations. As a result,
these estimates may increase or decrease depending upon the final determinations. Currently, the Company expects payments
will occur over an approximately 20 year period. The Company expects to incur similar types of charges in future periods in
connection with its ongoing restructuring activities. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has received determination letters
from two plans. Of those, the liability for one was settled with a lump sum payment, while monthly payments for the other plan
are expected to occur over an approximately 20 year period.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to establish

accounting policies and utilize estimates that affect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets, liabilities, net
sales and expenses. Some of these estimates require judgment about matters that are inherently uncertain. Different amounts
would be reported under different operating conditions or under alternative assumptions.

The Company has evaluated the accounting policies used in the preparation of the accompanying Consolidated

Financial Statements and related Notes and believes those policies to be reasonable and appropriate. Management believes
that the accounting estimates discussed below are the most critical accounting policies whose application may have a
significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of the Company and can require judgments by
management that affect their application.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable,

collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred. Revenue is recognized when the customer takes title and
assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. When management cannot conclude collectability is reasonably assured for
shipments to a particular customer, revenue associated with that customer is not recognized until cash is collected or
management is otherwise able to establish that collectability is reasonably assured.

Sales transactions with customers are designated free on board ("f.o.b.") destination and revenue is recorded when

the product is delivered to the customer’s delivery site, when title and risk of loss are transferred. Effective January 1, 2016,
the Company harmonized its shipping terms to be f.o.b. destination. Prior to that date, revenue was recorded at the time of
shipment for certain xpedx customers whose terms were designated f.o.b. shipping point. Management determined that any
shipments in transit at December 31, 2015 would honor the f.o.b. destination terms resulting in a reduction of $27.0 million
and $1.8 million to net sales and operating income, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Certain revenues are derived from shipments arranged by the Company made directly from a manufacturer to a

customer. The Company is considered to be a principal to these transactions because, among other factors, it controls pricing
to the customer and bears the credit risk of the customer defaulting on payment and is the primary obligor. Revenues from
these sales are reported on a gross basis in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and amounted to $3.0 billion, $3.0
billion and $3.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),
and its related interpretations on January 1, 2018 applying the modified retrospective method. The adoption did not materially
impact the Company's financial statements and is not expected to have a material impact on future financial results as the
adoption did not change the recognition pattern for the Company's existing revenue streams.

Acquisition and Integration Expenses

The Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations include a line item titled, "Acquisition and Integration

Expenses". Acquisition and Integration Expenses is not a defined term in U.S. GAAP, thus management must use judgment
in determining whether a particular expense should be classified as an acquisition and integration expense. Management
believes its accounting policy for acquisition and integration expenses is critical because these costs have been significant
and will continue to be significant in 2018, will generally involve cash expenditures, are not defined in U.S. GAAP, are
excluded in determining compliance with the ABL Facility and are excluded in determining management compensation.

Acquisition and integration expenses include internally dedicated integration management resources, retention
compensation, information technology conversion costs, rebranding, professional services and other costs to integrate its
businesses. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of these expenses.

Acquisition and integration expenses are differentiated from restructuring charges as restructuring charges primarily

relate to contract termination costs, involuntary termination benefits and other direct costs associated with consolidating
facilities and reorganizing functions.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the best estimate of losses inherent in the Company's accounts

receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and
other available evidence. The allowances contain uncertainties because the calculation requires management to make
assumptions and apply judgment regarding the customer’s credit worthiness. Veritiv performs ongoing evaluations of its
customers’ financial condition and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit
worthiness, as determined by its review of their current financial information. The Company continuously monitors
collections from its customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses based upon the customers’ financial
condition, collection experience and any other relevant customer specific information. Veritiv's assessment of this and other
information forms the basis of its allowances.

If the financial condition of Veritiv's customers deteriorates, resulting in an inability to make required payments to

the Company, or if economic conditions deteriorate, additional allowances may be deemed appropriate or required. If the
allowance for doubtful accounts changed by 0.1% of gross billed receivables, reflecting either an increase or decrease in
expected future write-offs, the impact to consolidated pretax income would have been approximately $1.2 million.

Employee Benefit Plans

Veritiv sponsors defined benefit plans and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans ("SERP") in the U.S. and

Canada. These plans were frozen prior to the Merger. See Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information about these plans.

Management is required to make certain critical estimates related to actuarial assumptions used to determine the

Company's pension expense and related obligation. The Company believes the most critical assumptions are related to (i) the
discount rate used to determine the present value of the liabilities and (ii) the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.
All of the actuarial assumptions are reviewed annually. Changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on the
measurement of pension expense and the related obligation.

At each measurement date, management determines the discount rate by reference to rates of high-quality, long-term

corporate bonds that mature in a pattern similar to the future payments anticipated to be made under the plans. As of
December 31, 2017, the weighted-average discount rates used to compute the benefit obligations were 3.33% and 3.40% for
the U.S. and Canadian plans, respectively.

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based upon the long-term outlook of the investment strategy

as well as historical returns and volatilities for each asset class. Veritiv also reviews current levels of interest rates and
inflation to assess the reasonableness of the long-term rates. The Company's pension plan investment objective is to ensure
all of its plans have sufficient funds to meet their benefit obligations when they become due. As a result, the Company
periodically revises asset allocations, where appropriate, to improve returns and manage risk. The weighted-average
expected long-term rate of return used to calculate the pension expense for the year ended 2017 was 7.15% and 5.50% for the
U.S. and Canadian plans, respectively.

The following illustrates the effects of a 1% change in the discount rate or return on plan assets on the 2017 net

periodic pension cost and projected benefit obligation (in millions):

Assumption

Discount rate

Change

1% increase

1% decrease

Return on plan assets

1% increase

1% decrease

Net Periodic
Benefit Cost

Projected Benefit
Obligation

$(0.2)

0.7

(1.4)

1.4

$(4.5)

6.7

N/A

See Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a comprehensive discussion of Veritiv's pension

and post-retirement benefit expense, including a discussion of the actuarial assumptions, the policy for recognizing the
associated gains and losses and the method used to estimate service and interest cost components.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding recently issued accounting

standards.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Veritiv is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes, foreign currency fluctuations, primarily related to the

Canadian dollar, and fuel price changes. The Company's objective is to identify and understand these risks and implement
strategies to manage them. When evaluating potential strategies, Veritiv evaluates the fundamentals of each market and the
underlying accounting and business implications. To implement these strategies, the Company may enter into various
hedging or similar transactions. The sensitivity analyses presented below do not consider the effect of possible adverse
changes in the general economy, nor do they consider additional actions the Company may take from time to time in the
future to mitigate the exposure to these or other market risks. There can be no assurance that Veritiv will manage or continue
to manage any risks in the future or that any of its efforts will be successful.

Derivative Instrument

Borrowings under the ABL Facility bear interest at a variable rate, based on LIBOR or the prime rate, in either case
plus an applicable margin. From time to time, Veritiv may use interest rate swap agreements to manage the variable interest
rate characteristics on a portion of the outstanding debt. The Company evaluates its outstanding indebtedness, market
conditions, and the covenants contained in the ABL Facility in order to determine its tolerance for potential increases in
interest expense that could result from changes in variable interest rates. In July 2015, the Company entered into an interest
rate cap agreement. The interest rate cap effectively limits the floating LIBOR-based portion of the interest rate. The interest
rate cap expires on July 1, 2019. The initial notional amount of this agreement covered $392.9 million of the Company’s
floating-rate debt at 3.0% plus the applicable credit spread. The Company paid $2.0 million for the interest rate cap
agreement. Approximately $0.6 million of the amount paid represented transaction costs and was expensed immediately to
earnings.

The Company designated the interest rate cap as a cash flow hedge of exposure to changes in cash flows due to

changes in the LIBOR-based portion of the interest rate above 3.0% on an equivalent amount of debt. The notional amount
of the cap is reduced throughout the term of the agreement to align with the expected repayment of the Company’s
outstanding floating-rate debt.

At December 31, 2017, the fair value of the interest rate cap was not significant. The amount expected to be

reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings during the next 12 months is approximately $0.7
million. During 2017 the amount reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense was not significant.

The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and, in the event of nonperformance, to

market risk for changes in the interest rate. The Company attempts to manage exposure to counterparty credit risk primarily
by selecting only counterparties that meet certain credit and other financial standards. The Company believes there has been
no material change in the creditworthiness of its counterparty and believes the risk of nonperformance by such party is
minimal. For additional information regarding Veritiv's interest rate swap, see Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.

Interest Rate Risk

Veritiv’s exposure to fluctuations in interest rates results primarily from its borrowings under the ABL Facility.

Under the terms of the ABL Facility, interest rates are based upon LIBOR or the prime rate plus a margin rate, or in the case
of Canada, a banker’s acceptance rate or base rate plus a margin rate. LIBOR based loans can be set for durations of one
week, or for periods of one to nine months. The margin rate amount can be adjusted upward or downward based upon usage
under the line in two increments of 25 basis points. Veritiv’s interest rate exposure under the ABL Facility results from
changes in LIBOR, bankers’ acceptance rates, the prime/base interest rates and actual borrowings. The weighted-average
borrowing interest rate at December 31, 2017 was 3.3%. Based on the average borrowings under the ABL Facility during the
year ended December 31, 2017, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the interest rate would result in approximately $8.5
million of additional interest expense.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Veritiv conducts business in various foreign currencies and is exposed to earnings and cash flow volatility associated

with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This exposure is primarily related to international assets and liabilities,
whose value could change materially in reference to the U.S. dollar reporting currency.

Veritiv’s most significant foreign currency exposure primarily relates to fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate

between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar. Net sales from Veritiv’s Canadian operations for the year ended
December 31, 2017 represented approximately 8% of Veritiv’s total net sales. Veritiv has not used foreign exchange currency
options or futures agreements to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Fuel Price Risk

Due to the nature of Veritiv's distribution business, the Company is exposed to potential volatility in fuel prices. The

cost of fuel affects the price paid for products as well as the costs incurred to deliver products to the Company's customers.
The price and availability of diesel fuel fluctuates due to changes in production, seasonality and other market factors
generally outside of the Company's control. Increased fuel costs may have a negative impact on the Company's results of
operations and financial condition. In times of higher fuel prices, Veritiv may have the ability to pass a portion of the
increased costs on to customers; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to do so. Based on
Veritiv's 2017 fuel consumption, a 10% increase in the average annual price per gallon of diesel fuel would result in a
potential increase of approximately $3.0 million in annual transportation fuel costs (excluding any amounts recovered from
customers). Veritiv does not use derivatives to manage its exposure to fuel prices.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Veritiv Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veritiv Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss),
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes
(collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated March 1, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and
are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also
included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 1, 2018

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2013.

VERITIV CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)

Net sales (including sales to related party of $32.2, $35.6 and $33.6,

respectively)

Cost of products sold (including purchases from related party of

$181.6, $224.9 and $264.7, respectively) (exclusive of depreciation
and amortization shown separately below)

Distribution expenses

Selling and administrative expenses

Depreciation and amortization

Acquisition and integration expenses

Restructuring charges, net
Operating income

Interest expense, net

Other (income) expense, net
Income (loss) before income taxes

Income tax expense
Net income (loss)

Earnings (loss) per share:

Basic earnings (loss) per share
Diluted earnings (loss) per share

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

Basic

Diluted

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

8,364.7

8,326.6

8,717.7

6,846.6

6,826.4

7,160.3

516.9

872.6

54.2

36.5

16.7

21.2

31.2
(8.1)
(1.9)
11.4
(13.3) $

(0.85) $
(0.85) $

15.70

505.1

826.2

54.7

25.9

12.4

75.9

27.5

7.6

40.8

19.8

21.0

1.31
1.30

15.97

16.15

$
$

521.8

853.9

56.9

34.9

11.3

78.6

27.0

6.7

44.9

18.2

26.7

1.67
1.67

16.00

$
$

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

VERITIV CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in millions)

Net income (loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of $2.0 tax for 2015
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge, net of $0.0, $0.1 and $0.3 tax,

respectively

Pension liability adjustments, net of ($0.6), ($0.3) and $0.3 tax, respectively

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Total comprehensive income (loss)

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

(13.3) $

21.0

26.7

5.7

(2.1)

(12.4)

0.0
(0.2)
5.5
(7.8) $

(0.2)
(1.7)
(4.0)
17.0

(0.5)
0.0
(12.9)
13.8

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

VERITIV CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in millions, except par value)

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

Assets

Current assets:

Cash
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $44.0 and $34.5, respectively
Related party receivable
Inventories
Other current assets

Total current assets
Property and equipment (net of depreciation and amortization of $314.6 and $292.8,

respectively)

Goodwill
Other intangibles, net
Deferred income tax assets
Other non-current assets
Total assets

Liabilities and shareholders' equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable
Related party payable
Accrued payroll and benefits
Other accrued liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt
Financing obligations, current portion (including obligations to related party of

$7.1 and $14.9, respectively)

Total current liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
Financing obligations, less current portion (including obligations to related party of

$155.2 and $176.1, respectively)
Defined benefit pension obligations
Other non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Shareholders' equity:

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10.0 million shares authorized, none issued
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100.0 million shares authorized, 16.0

million shares issued; shares outstanding - 15.7 million at December 31,
2017 and 2016

Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss

Treasury stock at cost - 0.3 million shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016

Total shareholders' equity
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

80.3
1,174.3
3.3
722.7
133.5
2,114.1

340.2
99.6
64.1
59.6
30.8
2,708.4

680.1
8.5
73.5
134.6
2.9

7.8
907.4
908.3

181.6
24.4
137.0
2,158.7

69.6
1,048.3
3.9
707.9
118.9
1,948.6

371.8
50.2
21.0
61.8
30.3
2,483.7

654.1
9.0
84.4
102.5
2.9

14.9
867.8
749.2

176.1
27.6
121.2
1,941.9

—

0.2
590.2
6.4
(33.5)
(13.6)
549.7
2,708.4

0.2
574.5
19.7
(39.0)
(13.6)
541.8
2,483.7

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

VERITIV CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2017

2015

Operating activities
Net income (loss)
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing fees
Net losses (gains) on dispositions of property and equipment
Goodwill and long-lived asset impairment charges
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts
Deferred income tax provision
Stock-based compensation
Other non-cash items, net
Changes in operating assets and liabilities

Accounts receivable and related party receivable
Inventories
Other current assets
Accounts payable and related party payable
Accrued payroll and benefits
Other accrued liabilities
Other

Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing activities

Property and equipment additions
Proceeds from asset sales
Cash paid for purchase of business, net of cash acquired

Net cash used for investing activities
Financing activities

Change in book overdrafts
Borrowings of long-term debt
Repayments of long-term debt
Payments under equipment capital lease obligations
Payments under financing obligations (including obligations to related party of

$15.0, $19.9 and $13.8, respectively)

Deferred financing fees
Purchase of treasury stock
Payments under Tax Receivable Agreement

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
Net change in cash
Cash at beginning of period
Cash at end of period
Supplemental cash flow information

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
Cash paid for interest

Non-cash investing and financing activities

(13.3) $
54.2
2.6
(25.7)
8.4
15.9
1.9
15.7
(8.8)

(101.9)
30.1
(8.4)
48.3
(11.3)
13.6
15.3
36.6

(32.5)
51.1
(144.8)
(126.2)

(40.5)
4,898.8
(4,731.5)
(2.7)

(16.4)

—
—
(8.5)
99.2
1.1
10.7
69.6
80.3

3.7
27.6

Non-cash additions to property and equipment
Contingent consideration for purchase of business: Earn-out

17.8
22.2
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

21.0
54.7
5.6
(0.8)
7.7
2.2
11.1
8.3
3.7

(14.7)
13.1
(11.4)
69.9
(40.9)
(3.6)
14.3
140.2

(41.0)
6.6
—
(34.4)

26.7
56.9
4.4
0.5
5.9
7.4
14.9
3.8
2.0

53.4
(62.0)
1.0
(8.4)
10.5
(7.1)
3.1
113.0

(44.4)
0.3
—
(44.1)

18.9
4,555.8
(4,625.9)
(3.2)

(5.8)
4,661.9
(4,708.9)
(3.8)

(19.9)

(2.0)
(13.6)
—
(89.9)
(0.7)
15.2
54.4
69.6

11.6
20.6

20.8
—

(13.8)

—
—
—
(70.4)
(1.7)
(3.2)
57.6
54.4

1.9
21.7

4.0
—

VERITIV CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in millions)

Common Stock
Issued

Shares Amount

16.0 $

—

0.2

—

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Accumulated
Earnings
(Deficit)

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

Treasury Stock

Shares Amount

Total

562.4

(28.0) $

(22.1)

— $

512.5

—

3.8

26.7

—

(12.9)

—

26.7

(12.9)

3.8

16.0 $

0.2

566.2

(1.3) $

(35.0)

— $

530.1

—

8.3

—

21.0

—

(4.0)

—

21.0

(4.0)

8.3

(0.3)

(13.6)

16.0 $

0.2

574.5

19.7

(39.0)

(0.3) $ (13.6) $

541.8

—

15.7

(13.3)

—

5.5

—

(13.3)

5.5

15.7

16.0 $

0.2

590.2

6.4

(33.5)

(0.3) $ (13.6) $

549.7

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Balance at

December 31,
2014

Net income
Other

comprehensive
loss

Stock-based

compensation

Balance at

December 31,
2015

Net income
Other

comprehensive
loss

Stock-based

compensation

Treasury stock
Balance at

December 31,
2016

Net loss
Other

comprehensive
income

Stock-based

compensation

Balance at

December 31,
2017

VERITIV CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

Veritiv Corporation ("Veritiv" or the "Company") is a North American business-to-business distributor of packaging,

facility solutions, print and publishing products and services. Additionally, Veritiv provides logistics and supply chain
management solutions to its customers. Veritiv was established on July 1, 2014 (the "Distribution Date"), following the
merger (the "Merger") of International Paper Company’s ("International Paper") xpedx distribution solutions business
("xpedx") and UWW Holdings, Inc. ("UWWH"), the parent company of Unisource Worldwide, Inc. ("Unisource").
On July 2, 2014, Veritiv’s common stock began regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker
symbol VRTV.

International Paper has a potential earn-out payment of up to $100.0 million that would become due in 2020 if

Veritiv's aggregate EBITDA for fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019 exceeds an agreed-upon target of $759.0 million, subject to
certain adjustments. The $100.0 million potential earn-out payment would be reflected by Veritiv as a reduction to equity at
the time of payment.

Following the Merger, certain corporate and other related functions continued to be provided by International Paper

under a transition services agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized $10.0 million in
selling and administrative expenses related to this agreement. As of December 31, 2015, all of the functions originally
provided by International Paper under this agreement have been fully transitioned to the Company.

Veritiv operates from approximately 170 distribution centers primarily throughout the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles

generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and include all of the Company’s subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany transactions between Veritiv's businesses have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and

assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses and certain financial statement
disclosures. Estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, revenue recognition, accounts receivable valuation,
inventory valuation, employee benefit plans, income tax contingency accruals and valuation allowances, recognition of the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act"), multi-employer pension plan withdrawal liabilities, contingency accruals and
goodwill and other intangible asset valuations. Although these estimates are based on management's knowledge of current
events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions.
Estimates are revised as additional information becomes available.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable,

Sales transactions with customers are designated free on board ("f.o.b.") destination and revenue is recorded when

Certain revenues are derived from shipments arranged by the Company made directly from a manufacturer to a

customer. The Company is considered to be a principal to these transactions because, among other factors, it controls pricing
to the customer, bears the credit risk of the customer defaulting on payment and is the primary obligor. Revenues from these
sales are reported on a gross basis in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and amounted to $3.0 billion, $3.0 billion
and $3.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for

on a net basis. Accordingly, such taxes are excluded from both net sales and expenses.

Purchase Incentives and Customer Rebates

Veritiv enters into agreements with suppliers that entitle Veritiv to receive rebates, allowances and other discounts
based on the attainment of specified purchasing levels or sales to certain customers. Purchase incentives are recorded as a
reduction to inventory and recognized in cost of products sold when the sale occurs. During the year ended December 31,
2017, approximately 38% of the Company's purchases were made from ten suppliers.

Veritiv also enters into incentive agreements with certain of its customers, which are generally based on sales to

these customers. Veritiv records estimated rebates to customers as a reduction to gross sales as customer revenue is
recognized.

Distribution Expenses

Distribution expenses consist of storage, handling and delivery costs including freight to the Company's customers’

destinations. Handling and delivery costs were $380.7 million, $371.7 million and $380.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Acquisition and Integration Expenses

Acquisition and integration expenses are expensed as incurred. Acquisition and integration expenses include

internally dedicated integration management resources, retention compensation, information technology conversion costs,
rebranding, professional services and other costs to integrate its businesses.

Accounts Receivable and Allowances

Accounts receivable are recognized net of allowances. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the best

estimate of losses inherent in the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience,
specific allowances for known troubled accounts and other available evidence. The other allowances balance is inclusive of
returns, discounts and any other items affecting the realization of these assets. Accounts receivable are written off when
management determines they are uncollectible.

The components of the accounts receivable allowances were as follows:

(in millions)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

Other allowances

Total accounts receivable allowances

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

32.4

11.6

44.0

23.7

10.8

34.5

Below is a rollforward of the Company's accounts receivable allowances for the years ended December 31, 2017,

2016 and 2015:

(in millions)

Beginning balance, January 1

Add / (Deduct):

Provision for bad debt expense

Net write-offs and recoveries
Other adjustments(1)

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

34.5

33.3

39.0

15.9

(7.7)
1.3

2.2

(6.7)
5.7

7.4

(13.1)
—

Ending balance, December 31
(1) Other adjustments represent amounts reserved for returns and discounts, foreign currency translation adjustments and reserves for customer accounts
where revenue is not recognized because collectability is not reasonably assured, and may include accounts receivable allowances recorded in connection
with acquisitions. 2015 amounts were not material.

34.5

44.0

33.3

Inventories

The Company's inventories are primarily comprised of finished goods and predominantly valued at cost as

determined by the last-in first-out ("LIFO") method. Such valuations are not in excess of market. Elements of cost in
inventories include the purchase price invoiced by a supplier, plus inbound freight and related costs and reduced by estimated
volume-based discounts and early pay discounts available from certain suppliers. Approximately 86% and 87% of
inventories were valued using the LIFO method as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. If the first-in, first-out
method had been used, total inventory balances would be increased by approximately $78.7 million and $71.3 million at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company reduces the value of obsolete inventory based on the difference between the LIFO cost of the

inventory and the estimated market value using assumptions of future demand and market conditions. To estimate the net
realizable value, the Company considers factors such as age of the inventory, the nature of the products, the quantity of items
on-hand relative to sales trends, current market prices and trends in pricing, its ability to use excess supply in another
channel, historical write-offs and expected residual values or other recoveries.

Veritiv maintains some of its inventory on a consignment basis in which the inventory is physically located at the
customer's premises or a third-party warehouse. Veritiv had $50.9 million and $47.3 million of consigned inventory as of
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, valued on a LIFO basis, net of reserves.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and software amortization. Expenditures
for replacements and major improvements are capitalized, whereas repair and maintenance costs that do not improve service
potential or extend economic life are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes certain computer software and
development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software for internal use. Costs related to the
development of internal use software, other than those incurred during the application development stage, are expensed as
incurred.

The components of property and equipment, net were as follows:

(in millions)
Land, buildings and improvements
Machinery and equipment
Equipment capital leases and assets related to financing obligations (including

financing obligations with related party)

Internal use software
Construction-in-progress
Less: Accumulated depreciation and software amortization
Property and equipment, net

December 31,

2017

2016

106.6
145.3

233.3
159.2
10.4
(314.6)
340.2

132.0
131.1

215.5
151.0
35.0
(292.8)
371.8

Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Land is not
depreciated, and construction-in-progress ("CIP") is not depreciated until ready for service. Leased property and leasehold
improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term or useful life of the asset, whichever is less.

Depreciation and amortization for property and equipment, other than land and CIP, is based upon the following

estimated useful lives:

Buildings

Leasehold improvements

Machinery and equipment

Equipment capital leases and assets related to financing obligations

(including financing obligations with related party)

Internal use software

40 years

1 to 20 years

3 to 15 years

3 to 5 years

Additional property and equipment information is as follows:

(in millions)
Depreciation expense (1)
Amortization expense - internal use software
Depreciation and amortization expense related to
property and equipment

Accumulated depreciation on equipment capital
leases and assets related to financing obligations
(including financing obligations with related
party)
Unamortized internal use software costs,
including amounts recorded in CIP

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

32.6

18.4

51.0

33.5

16.5

50.0

35.6

37.6

33.8

17.5

51.3

29.7

43.9

(1)

Includes the depreciation expense for equipment capital leases and assets related to financing obligations (including financing obligations with

related party).

Upon retirement or other disposal of property and equipment, the cost and related amount of accumulated

depreciation or accumulated amortization are eliminated from the asset and accumulated depreciation or accumulated
amortization accounts, respectively. The difference, if any, between the net asset value and the proceeds is included in net
income.

Leases

The Company leases certain property and equipment used for operations. Such lease arrangements are reviewed for

capital or operating classification at their inception.

Capital lease obligations consist of delivery equipment, material handling equipment, computer hardware and office

equipment which are leased through third parties under non-cancelable leases with terms generally ranging from three to
eight years. Many of the delivery equipment leases include annual rate increases based on the Consumer Price Index which
are included in the calculation of the initial lease obligation. The carrying value of the related equipment associated with
these capital leases is included within property and equipment, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and depreciated over
the term of the lease. The Company does not record rent expense for capital leases. Rather, rental payments under the lease
are recognized as a reduction of the capital lease obligation and interest expense. Depreciation expense for assets under
capital leases is included in the total depreciation expense disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

All other leases are operating leases. Certain lease agreements include renewal options and rent escalation clauses.

Assets subject to an operating lease and the related lease payments are not recorded on the Company’s balance sheet. Rent
expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.

The term for all types of leases begins on the date the Company becomes legally obligated for the rent payments or

takes possession of the asset, whichever is earlier. See Note 7, Leases, for additional information related to the Company's
leases.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net

Goodwill relating to a single business reporting unit is included as an asset of the applicable segment. Goodwill
arising from major acquisitions that involve multiple reportable segments is allocated to the reporting units based on the
relative fair value of the reporting unit.

Goodwill is reviewed by Veritiv for impairment on a reporting unit basis annually on October 1st or more frequently
if indicators are present or changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist. The testing of goodwill for possible
impairment is performed by completing a Step 0 test or electing to by-pass the Step 0 test and comparing the fair value of a
reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. The Step 0 test utilizes qualitative factors to determine whether it
is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors include:
macroeconomic conditions; industry and market considerations; overall financial performance and cost factors to determine
whether a reporting unit is at risk for goodwill impairment.

In the event a reporting unit fails the Step 0 goodwill impairment test, it is necessary to move forward with a

comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the
carrying value, goodwill is not considered to be impaired. If the fair value of a reporting unit is below the carrying value, a
goodwill impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair
value; however, any loss recognized will not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. See Note 4,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for additional information related to the Company's goodwill.

Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recorded at fair value. The Company's intangible assets

include customer relationships, trademarks and trade names and non-compete agreements. Intangible assets with finite useful
lives are subsequently amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. See the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets section below for the accounting policy related to the periodic review of long-lived
intangible assets for impairment. See Note 4, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for additional information related to the
Company's intangible assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, including finite lived intangible assets, are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived
assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow the assets are expected to generate and recognizes an impairment loss when
estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from
disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When an impairment is identified, the Company
reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach or, when
available and appropriate, to comparable market values.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, impairment charges of $0.7 million and $1.9 million,
respectively, were recorded for certain long-lived assets that supported multiple segments. These charges were recorded as

selling and administrative expense as they were not related to the Company's restructuring efforts. For the year ended
December 31, 2015, impairment charges of $4.0 million were recorded for certain long-lived assets that supported multiple
segments, with $0.7 million recorded as selling and administrative expense and $3.3 million recorded as restructuring
expense. See Note 3, Acquisition, Integration and Restructuring Charges for additional information related to the Company's
restructuring efforts.

Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors and/or contributes to defined contribution plans, defined benefit pension plans and multi-
employer pension plans in the United States. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries have various pension plans and
other forms of retirement arrangements outside the United States. See Note 10, Employee Benefit Plans, for additional
information related to these plans and arrangements.

The determination of defined benefit pension and postretirement plan obligations and their associated costs requires

the use of actuarial computations to estimate participant plan benefits to which the employees will be entitled. The
Company’s significant assumptions in this regard include discount rates, rate of future compensation increases, expected
long-term rates of return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. Each assumption is developed using relevant
company experience in conjunction with market-related data in the U.S. and Canada. All actuarial assumptions are reviewed
annually with third-party consultants and adjusted, as necessary.

For the recognition of net periodic postretirement cost, the calculation of the expected long-term rate of return on

plan assets is derived using the fair value of plan assets at the measurement date. Actual results that differ from the
Company's assumptions are accumulated and amortized on a straight-line basis only to the extent they exceed 10% of the
higher of the fair value of plan assets or the projected benefit obligation, over the estimated remaining service period of active
participants. The fair value of plan assets is determined based on market prices or estimated fair value at the measurement
date.

The Company also makes contributions to multi-employer pension plans for its union employees covered by such

plans. For these plans, the Company recognizes a liability only for any required contributions to the plans or surcharges
imposed by the plans that are accrued and unpaid at the balance sheet date. The Company does not record an asset or liability
to recognize the funded status of the plans. The Company records an estimated undiscounted charge when it becomes
probable that it has incurred a withdrawal liability, as the final amount and timing is not assured. When a final determination
of the withdrawal liability is received from the plan, the estimated charge is adjusted to the final amount determined by the
plan.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures and records compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on the grant date fair

values over the vesting period of the awards. Forfeitures are recognized when they occur. See Note 15, Equity-Based
Incentive Plans, for additional information.

Income Taxes

Veritiv's income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits reflect

management’s best assessment of estimated current and future taxes to be paid. Veritiv records its global tax provision based
on the respective tax rules and regulations for the jurisdictions in which it operates. Where treatment of a position is
uncertain, liabilities are recorded based upon an evaluation of the more likely than not outcome considering technical merits
of the position. Changes to recorded liabilities are made only when an identifiable event occurs that alters the likely
outcome, such as settlement with the relevant tax authority or the expiration of statutes of limitation for the subject tax year.
Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense.

The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code.

We recognized provisional estimates of the impact of the Tax Act in the year ended December 31, 2017. These provisional
amounts may be adjusted during 2018 in accordance with the measurement period guidance outlined in Securities and
Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. See Note 8, Income Taxes of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional details regarding the Tax Act.

Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will

not be realized. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the need for and amount of valuation allowances against
deferred tax assets. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating sufficient future taxable income.

While Veritiv believes that these judgments and estimates are appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances,

actual resolution of these matters may differ from recorded estimated amounts.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting
inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable.

Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable market-based inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are

observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions or

external inputs from inactive markets.

See Note 11, Fair Value Measurements, for further detail.

Foreign Currency

The assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiaries are translated from their respective local currencies to the U.S.

dollars at the appropriate spot rates as of the balance sheet date. Changes in the carrying values of these assets and liabilities
attributable to fluctuations in spot rates are recognized in foreign currency translation adjustment, a component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL"). See Note 14, Shareholders' Equity, for the impacts of foreign currency
translation adjustments on AOCL.

The revenues and expenses of the foreign subsidiaries are translated using the monthly average exchange rates

during the year. The gains or losses from foreign currency transactions are included in other (income) expense, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Treasury Stock

Common stock purchased for treasury is recorded at cost. Costs incurred by the Company that are associated with
the acquisition of treasury stock are treated in a manner similar to stock issue costs and are added to the cost of the treasury
stock.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

Standard
Accounting Standards
Update ("ASU")
2016-02, Leases (Topic
842)

Effective
Date
January 1,
2019; early
adoption is
permitted

Description

The standard requires lessees to put most leases
on their balance sheet but recognize expenses in
their statement of operations in a manner similar
to current accounting guidance. The new standard
also eliminates the current guidance related to real
estate specific provisions. The guidance requires
application on a modified retrospective basis to
leases that existed at the beginning of the earliest
period presented and those entered into thereafter
but prior to the effective date. A proposed ASU
has been issued that would add the option for
organizations to not provide comparative period
financial statements and instead apply the
transition requirements as of the effective date.
The standard permits entities to elect a package of
practical expedients which must be applied
consistently to all leases that commenced prior to
the effective date. If the package of practical
expedients is elected, entities do not need to
reassess: (i) whether expired or existing contracts
contain leases; (ii) lease classification for any
expired or existing leases; and (iii) initial direct
costs for any existing leases. The guidance also
allows entities to make certain policy elections
under the new standard, including: (i) the use of
hindsight to determine lease term and when
assessing existing right of use assets for
impairment; (ii) a policy to not record short-term
leases on the balance sheet; and (iii) a policy to
not separate lease and non-lease components.

Effect on the Financial
Statements or Other
Significant Matters

The Company is currently
evaluating this standard and
anticipates that its adoption
will have a material impact
on the Consolidated
Financial Statements and
related disclosures as it will
result in recording
substantially all operating
leases on the balance sheet
as a lease obligation and
right of use asset. Lease
software has been
implemented that will better
enable the Company to
implement the standard.
The Company currently
anticipates electing to apply
the package of practical
expedients to all leases that
commenced prior to the date
of adoption. Based on the
analysis performed to date,
the Company anticipates
making a policy election to
not include short-term
leases on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and to
separate lease and non-lease
components. The Company
currently does not anticipate
making a policy election to
use hindsight to determine
lease term. The assessment
is ongoing and the
preliminary conclusions are
subject to change. At this
time the Company is unable
to quantify the impact that
the adoption of this standard
will have on the
Consolidated Financial
Statements and related
disclosures. The Company
currently plans to adopt this
ASU on January 1, 2019.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted (continued)

Standard

ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments-
Credit Losses (Topic
326)

ASU 2018-02, Income
Statement-Reporting
Comprehensive Income
(Topic 220)

Description

The standard will replace the currently required
incurred loss impairment methodology with
guidance that reflects expected credit losses and
requires consideration of a broader range of
reasonable and supportable information to be
considered in making credit loss estimates. The
guidance requires application on a modified
retrospective basis. Other application
requirements exist for specific assets impacted by
a more-than-insignificant credit deterioration
since origination.

The standard allows companies to reclassify the
effect of the change in tax laws and rates on
deferred tax assets and liabilities as part of the Tax
Act from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to retained earnings. The guidance
is to be applied to each period in which the effect
of the Tax Act (or portion thereof) is recorded and
companies may apply it either (1) retrospectively
as of the date of enactment or (2) as of the
beginning of the period of adoption.

Effective
Date
January 1,
2020; early
adoption is
permitted for
fiscal years
beginning
after
December
15, 2018

January 1,
2019; early
adoption is
permitted.

Effect on the Financial
Statements or Other
Significant Matters

The Company is currently
evaluating the impact this
ASU will have on its
Consolidated Financial
Statements and related
disclosures. The Company
currently plans to adopt this
ASU on January 1, 2020.

The Company is currently
evaluating early adoption
and the impact this ASU
will have on its
Consolidated Financial
Statements and related
disclosures.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Standard
ASU 2014-09, Revenue
from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606)

Description

The standard replaces previous revenue
recognition standards and significantly expands
the disclosure requirements for revenue
arrangements. It may be adopted either
retrospectively or on a modified retrospective
basis to new contracts and existing contracts with
remaining performance obligations as of the
effective date.

Effective
Date

January 1,
2018; early
adoption date
is no earlier
than the
annual period
beginning
after
December
15, 2016

Effect on the Financial
Statements or Other
Significant Matters
The Company adopted this
ASU on January 1, 2018
applying the modified
retrospective method.
Focus areas were customer
rebates, accounting for
customer dedicated
inventory and principal/
agent considerations. The
adoption did not materially
impact the Company's
Financial Statements and is
not expected to have a
material impact on future
financial results as the
adoption did not change the
recognition pattern for the
Company's existing revenue
streams. The Company
implemented new internal
controls related to contract
reviews and revenue
recognition disclosures.
Additional disclosures will
be made as needed in future
reports as a result of the
adoption in 2018.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards (continued)

Standard

ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash
Flows (Topic 230)

Description
The standard addresses eight specific cash flow
issues and is intended to reduce diversity in
practice in how certain cash receipts and cash
payments are presented and classified in the
statement of cash flows. The guidance requires
application on a retrospective basis.

ASU 2017-01, Business
Combinations (Topic
805)

ASU 2017-07,
Compensation-
Retirement Benefits
(Topic 715)

ASU 2015-11,
Inventory - Simplifying
the Measurement of
Inventory (Topic 330)

The standard clarifies the definition of a business
with the objective of adding guidance to assist
entities with evaluating whether transactions
should be accounted for as acquisitions (or
disposals) of assets or businesses. The guidance
requires application on a prospective basis.

The standard requires employers to disaggregate
the service cost component from the other
components of net benefit cost and disclose the
amount of net benefit cost that is included in the
income statement or capitalized in assets, by line
item. The standard requires employers to report
the service cost component in the same line
item(s) as other compensation costs and to report
other pension-related costs (which include
interest costs, amortization of pension-related
costs from prior periods, and the gains or losses
on plan assets) separately and exclude them from
the subtotal of operating income. The standard
also allows only the service cost component to be
eligible for capitalization when applicable. The
guidance requires application on a retrospective
basis for the presentation of the service cost
component and the other components of net
periodic pension cost and net periodic
postretirement benefit cost in the income
statement and on a prospective basis for the
capitalization of the service cost component of
net periodic pension cost and net periodic
postretirement benefit in assets.

The standard requires companies to measure
inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable
value, thereby simplifying the current guidance
under which an entity must measure inventory at
the lower of cost or market. This ASU will not
apply to inventories measured by either the last-in
first-out method or retail inventory method. The
guidance requires application on a prospective
basis.

Effective
Date

January 1,
2018; early
adoption is
permitted
(early
adoption
requires the
adoption of
all
amendments
in the same
period)

January 1,
2018; early
adoption is
permitted

January 1,
2018; early
adoption is
permitted as
of the first
interim
period of an
annual period
for which
interim or
annual
financial
statements
have not been
issued

January 1,
2017

Effect on the Financial
Statements or Other
Significant Matters
The Company adopted this
ASU on January 1, 2018.
The adoption did not
materially impact the
Company's historical
Consolidated Financial
Statements or related
disclosures. Impacts to
future results and
disclosures will be
dependent upon the
presence of any items noted
in the standard.
The Company adopted this
ASU on January 1, 2018.

The Company adopted this
ASU on January 1, 2018.
The adoption did not
materially impact its
historical Consolidated
Financial Statements or
related disclosures.

The Company adopted this
ASU on January 1, 2017.
The adoption did not
materially impact its
Consolidated Financial
Statements or related
disclosures. For the years
ended December 31, 2017
and 2016, approximately
86% and 87% of the
inventory balances were
measured using LIFO,
respectively.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards (continued)

Standard

ASU 2017-04,
Intangibles - Goodwill
and Other (Topic 350)

Description
The standard simplifies how an entity is required
to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating
Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2
measures a goodwill impairment loss by
comparing the implied fair value of a reporting
unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. The guidance requires application on a
prospective basis.

Effect on the Financial
Statements or Other
Significant Matters
The Company adopted this
ASU on January 1, 2017.

Effective
Date
January 1,
2020; early
adoption is
permitted

ASU 2017-09,
Compensation - Stock
Compensation (Topic
718)

The standard clarifies the changes to the terms
and conditions of a share-based payment award
that require an entity to apply modification
accounting. The guidance requires application on
a prospective basis.

January 1,
2018; early
adoption is
permitted

The Company adopted this
ASU on April 1, 2017. The
adoption did not materially
impact its Consolidated
Financial Statements or
related disclosures. Impacts
to future results and
disclosures will be
dependent upon the
presence of any items noted
in the standard.

2. 2017 ACQUISITION

On August 31, 2017 (the "Acquisition Date"), Veritiv completed its acquisition of 100% of the equity interest in

various All American Containers entities (collectively, "AAC"), a family owned and operated distributor of rigid packaging,
including plastic, glass and metal containers, caps, closures and plastic pouches. The acquisition of AAC aligns with the
Company's strategy of investing in higher growth and higher margin segments of the business. Through the acquisition,
Veritiv gains expertise in rigid plastic, glass and metal packaging that complements its portfolio of packaging products and
services. This acquisition also provides Veritiv with additional marketing, selling and distribution channels into the growing
U.S. rigid packaging market. The rigid packaging market's primary product categories include paperboard, plastics, metals
and glass.

Acquisition-related costs of approximately $7.3 million were expensed as incurred. These costs were recognized in

acquisition and integration expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
These charges are included in the table in Note 3, Acquisition, Integration and Restructuring Charges, and related primarily to
legal, consulting and other professional fees, and retention.

The acquisition of AAC was accounted for in the Company's financial statements using the acquisition method of

accounting. The total consideration to complete the acquisition was approximately $169.8 million. Due to the limited
amount of time since the acquisition of AAC, the valuation of certain assets and liabilities is preliminary and, as management
receives additional information during the measurement period, these assets and liabilities may be adjusted. The preliminary
purchase price was allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective estimated fair values.
The following table summarizes the components of the preliminary estimated purchase price for AAC:

Preliminary estimated purchase price:

Cash consideration

Loan pay-off

Contingent consideration

Other

Total preliminary estimated purchase price

(in millions)

112.0

34.3

22.2

1.3

169.8

The following table summarizes the allocation of the preliminary estimated purchase price to assets acquired and

liabilities assumed as of the Acquisition Date based on valuation information, estimates and assumptions available on
December 31, 2017. See Note 4, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for additional information related to the goodwill
and intangible assets acquired in the AAC acquisition. See Note 11, Fair Value Measurements, for additional information
related to the fair value of the contingent consideration related to the earn-out.

Preliminary allocation:

Cash

Accounts receivable

Inventories

Other current assets

Property and equipment

Goodwill

Other intangible assets
Other non-current assets

Accounts payable

Other current liabilities

Other non-current liabilities

Total preliminary estimated purchase price

(in millions)

1.5

30.4

38.5

5.7

3.5

55.5

49.0
1.4
(12.4)
(2.7)
(0.6)
169.8

The amounts shown above may change as the purchase price will be based upon finalization of customary working
capital adjustments. The Company is still in the process of verifying data and finalizing information related to the valuation
and expects to finalize these matters within the measurement period as final asset and liability valuations are completed.

Actual and Pro Forma Impact (unaudited)

The operating results of AAC are included in the Company's financial statements from September 1, 2017 through

December 31, 2017 and are reported as part of the Packaging reportable segment. Net sales and operating loss attributable to
AAC during this period and included in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations were $71.7 million and ($1.7)
million, respectively.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents results as if the acquisition of AAC occurred on

January 1, 2016. The historical consolidated financial information of the Company and AAC has been adjusted in the pro
forma information to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the transaction and are factually
supportable. The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect events that have occurred or may occur after the transaction,
including the impact of any synergies expected to result from the acquisition. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma financial
information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations as they would have been had the transaction been
effected on the assumed date, nor is it necessarily an indication of future operating results.

(Unaudited)

Year Ended December 31,

(in millions, except share and per
share data)

Net sales

Net income (loss)

Earnings (loss) per share:

Basic earnings (loss) per share

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

Weighted-average shares
outstanding

Basic

Diluted

2017

2016

8,527.6

(7.2)

8,548.2

14.1

(0.46) $

15.70

0.88

0.87

15.97

16.15

The unaudited pro forma information reflects primarily the following pre-tax adjustments for the respective periods:

- Acquisition and integration expenses: Acquisition and integration expenses of $8.9 million incurred
during the year ended December 31, 2017 have been eliminated. Pro forma net income for the year ended
December 31, 2016 includes acquisition and integration expenses of $8.9 million.
- Incremental amortization expense: Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes
incremental amortization expense of $2.5 million. Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31,
2016 includes incremental amortization expense of $6.3 million.
- Interest expense: Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes incremental
interest expense of $2.0 million. Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 includes
incremental interest expense of $2.4 million.

A combined U.S. federal statutory and state rate of 39.0% was used to determine the after-tax impact on net income

of the pro forma adjustments.

3. ACQUISITION, INTEGRATION AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

Merger of xpedx and Unisource

The Company currently expects net costs and charges associated with achieving anticipated cost savings and other

synergies from the Merger (excluding charges relating to the complete or partial withdrawal from multi-employer pension
plans ("MEPP"), some of which are uncertain at this time, and including cash proceeds from sales of assets related to
consolidation), to be approximately $225 million to $250 million, through December 31, 2018. Included in the estimate is
approximately $90 million for capital expenditures, primarily consisting of information technology infrastructure, systems
integration and planning. Through December 31, 2017, the Company has incurred approximately $221 million in costs and
charges, including approximately $82 million for capital expenditures.

Acquisition and Integration Expenses

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, Veritiv incurred costs and charges related primarily to:

internally dedicated integration management resources, retention compensation, information technology conversion costs,
rebranding, professional services and other costs to integrate its businesses. The following table summarizes the components
of acquisition and integration expenses:

(in millions)

Integration management

Retention compensation

Information technology conversion costs

Rebranding

Legal, consulting and other professional fees

Other

AAC acquisition and integration

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

14.5

0.2

8.8

0.5

1.5

3.0

8.0

8.3

2.5

6.3

2.4

2.3

4.1

—

Total acquisition and integration expenses

36.5

25.9

—

10.8

7.4

6.1

7.8

2.8

—

34.9

Veritiv Restructuring Plan

As part of the Merger, the Company is executing on a multi-year restructuring program of its North American

operations intended to integrate the legacy xpedx and Unisource operations, generate cost savings and capture synergies
across the combined company. The restructuring plan includes initiatives to: (i) consolidate warehouse facilities in
overlapping markets, (ii) improve efficiency of the delivery network, (iii) consolidate customer service centers, (iv)
reorganize the field sales and operations functions and (v) restructure the corporate general and administrative functions.
As part of its restructuring efforts, the Company continues to evaluate its operations outside of North America to identify
additional cost saving opportunities. The Company may elect to restructure its operations in specific countries, which may
include staff reductions, lease terminations and facility closures, or a complete exit of a market. The Company may continue
to record restructuring charges in the future as restructuring activities progress, which may include gains or losses from the
disposition of assets. See Note 17, Segment Information, for the impact these charges had on the Company's reportable
segments.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized $24.4 million and $2.1 million in

net gains related to the sale or exit of certain facilities and a $4.1 million net non-cash loss from asset impairments,
respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the Company held for sale $3.2 million in assets related to these activities, which are
included in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other direct costs reported in the tables below include facility closing costs, actual and estimated multi-employer

pension plan withdrawal charges and other incidental costs associated with the development, communication, administration
and implementation of these initiatives.

The following table presents a summary of restructuring charges, net, related to active restructuring initiatives that

were incurred during the last three fiscal years and the cumulative recorded amounts since the initiative began:

(in millions)

Severance and
Related Costs

Other Direct
Costs

Gain on Sale
of Assets and
Other

Total

2017

2016

2015

Cumulative

7.5

3.5

4.3

20.0

33.6

11.0

2.9

47.9

(24.4)
(2.1)
4.1
(22.4)

16.7

12.4

11.3

45.5

The following is a summary of the Company's restructuring liability activity for the periods presented:

(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015

Costs incurred
Payments

Balance at December 31, 2016

Costs incurred
Payments

Balance at December 31, 2017

Severance and
Related Costs
1.7
$
3.5
(3.4)
1.8
7.5
(4.9)
4.4

Other Direct
Costs

Total

0.4
11.0
(3.4)
8.0
33.6
(16.4)
25.2

2.1
14.5
(6.8)
9.8
41.1
(21.3)
29.6

The Company has recorded undiscounted charges related to the complete or partial withdrawal from various multi-
employer pension plans. Charges not related to the Company's restructuring efforts are recorded as distribution expenses.
Initial amounts are recorded as other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See the table below for a
summary of the net withdrawal charges for the respective years ended December 31:

Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2017

2016

Restructuring
charges, net

Distribution expenses

Total Net Charges

17.4

7.5

2.1

2.3

19.5

9.8

Final charges for these MEPP withdrawals will not be known until the plans issue their respective determinations.

As a result, these estimates may increase or decrease depending upon the final determinations. Currently, the Company
expects payments will occur over an approximate 20 year period. The Company expects to incur similar types of charges in
future periods in connection with its ongoing restructuring activities. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has received
the determination letters from one of the restructuring related plans. Monthly payments for this plan are expected to occur
over an approximate 20 year period.

4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

At December 31, 2017, the net goodwill balance was $99.6 million. The following table sets forth the changes in

the carrying amount of goodwill during 2017 and 2016:

(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015:
Goodwill
Accumulated impairment losses
Net goodwill 2015

2016 Activity:

Goodwill acquired

Impairment of goodwill

Balance at December 31, 2016:

Goodwill

Accumulated impairment losses

Net goodwill 2016

2017 Activity:

Goodwill acquired

Impairment of goodwill

Balance at December 31, 2017:

Goodwill

Accumulated impairment losses

Packaging

Facility
Solutions

Publishing

Corporate
& Other

Total

44.1
—
44.1

59.0
(59.0)
—

265.4
(265.4)
—

50.5
(50.5)
—

—

44.1

—

44.1

55.5

—

99.6

—

59.0
(59.0)
—

—

265.4
(265.4)
—

—

50.5
(50.5)
—

—

59.0
(59.0)

265.4
(265.4)

50.5
(50.5)

6.1
—
6.1

—

6.1

—

6.1

—
(6.1)

6.1
(6.1)

425.1
(374.9)
50.2

—

425.1
(374.9)
50.2

55.5
(6.1)

480.6
(381.0)
99.6

Net goodwill 2017

99.6

— $

Preliminary goodwill of $55.5 million arising from the acquisition of AAC, as described in Note 2, 2017
Acquisition, consists largely of the expected synergies and other benefits from combining operations and is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill was allocated 100% to the Company's Packaging reportable segment.

During the third quarter of 2017, as part of the Company's review for possible goodwill impairment indicators,

management determined that the goodwill allocated to the logistics solutions business was fully impaired. The impairment
was recorded as selling and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 11, Fair Value
Measurements, for additional information related to the impairment. There were no other goodwill impairment charges for
the year ended December 31, 2017. No goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the year ended December 31,
2016. During the fourth quarter of 2015, a $1.9 million goodwill impairment was identified and recorded as selling and
administrative expense for the Facility Solutions segment.

Other Intangible Assets

The components of the Company's other intangible assets were as follows:

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

(in millions)
Customer relationships
Trademarks/Trade names

Non-compete agreements

Total

Gross
Carrying
Amount

67.7
3.8

1.5

Accumulated
Amortization
6.1
$
2.3

Net

61.6
1.5

1.0

64.1

0.5

8.9

Gross
Carrying
Amount

23.6
2.7

—

73.0

26.3

Accumulated
Amortization
4.0
$
1.3

Net

19.6
1.4

—

21.0

—

5.3

The gross carrying amount of other intangible assets increased by $49.0 million as a result of the acquisition of

AAC. The Company is still in the process of verifying data and finalizing information related to the valuation and expects to
finalize these matters within the measurement period as final asset and liability valuations are completed. These assets are
included in other intangibles, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized to operating expense on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Preliminary allocated values from the AAC acquisition are as follows:

Gross Value (in millions)

Estimated Useful Life
(in years)

Customer relationships

Trademarks/Trade names

Non-compete agreements

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired

46.4

1.1

1.5

49.0

14.0

1.0

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company recognized a $1.6 million non-restructuring asset impairment charge

related to its logistics solutions business's customer relationship intangible asset, which was recorded in selling and
administrative expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized $2.8 million and $3.0 million
in asset impairment charges related to its Print and Publishing segments' customer relationship intangible assets, respectively,
which were recorded in selling and administrative expenses. No intangible asset impairment charges were recorded during
the year ended December 31, 2015.

See Note 11, Fair Value Measurements, for additional information related to these impairments.

Upon retirement or full impairment of the intangible asset, the cost and related amount of accumulated amortization

are eliminated from the asset and accumulated amortization accounts, respectively.

The Company recorded amortization expense of $4.2 million, $3.4 million and $5.9 million for the years ended

December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is as follows (in millions):

Year

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Total

6.7

4.8

5. DEBT AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

The Company's long-term debt obligations were as follows:

(in millions)

December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016

Asset-Based Lending Facility (the "ABL Facility")

Equipment capital lease and other obligations

Total debt

Less: current maturities of long-term debt

Long-term debt, net of current maturities

897.7

13.5

911.2
(2.9)
908.3

726.9

25.2

752.1
(2.9)
749.2

The equipment capital lease and other obligations reported in the table above includes $19.1 million

related to the accumulated construction costs for the Toronto build-to-suit arrangement as of December 31, 2016.
This project was completed during the second quarter of 2017 and is accounted for as a financing obligation. As
such, for periods beginning with the second quarter of 2017 the obligation value is shown in the table below as
other financing, in addition to the Company's related party financing obligations.

The Company's long-term financing obligations were as follows:

(in millions)
Obligations to related party

Obligations - other financing

Total financing obligations

Less: current portion of financing obligations

Financing obligations, less current portion

December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016

162.3

27.1

189.4
(7.8)
181.6

191.0

—

191.0
(14.9)
176.1

From the Merger through December 31, 2017, the Company has terminated agreements for 11 of the related party
financed properties and therefore triggered an early termination of each respective property's financing agreement. One of
these terminations also involved the purchase of a facility in Austin, Texas. See Note 7, Leases, for additional information
related to that purchase. Upon termination of a property's financing agreement, the Company recognizes the non-cash effects
of the derecognition of (i) the property and equipment and (ii) the corresponding financing obligation, as other non-cash
items, net, on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Any gain or loss realized upon derecognition has been included in
other (income) expense, net or restructuring charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, based upon the rationale
for the termination. Unless terminated early, upon the expiration of the term of the remaining related party financing
agreements, the net remaining financing obligation of $155.2 million will be settled by the return of the assets to the owner
and has been included in other non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See the table below for the non-
cash effects of the derecognition of (i) the property and equipment and (ii) the corresponding financing obligation:

(in millions, except
number of agreements)

Property and equipment

Financing obligations

Number of terminated
property agreements

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

Total

14.6

15.2

3.7

8.4

18.3

23.6

ABL Facility

Veritiv has a $1.4 billion asset-based lending facility. The ABL Facility is comprised of U.S. and Canadian sub-

facilities of $1,250.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively. The ABL Facility is available to be drawn in U.S. dollars, in
the case of the U.S. sub-facilities, and in U.S. dollars or Canadian dollars, in the case of the Canadian sub-facilities, or in
other currencies that are mutually agreeable. The Company's accounts receivable and inventories in the U.S. and Canada are
collateral under the ABL Facility.

On August 11, 2016, the Company amended the ABL Facility to, among other things, extend the maturity date to

Availability under the ABL Facility is determined based upon a monthly borrowing base calculation which includes
eligible customer receivables and inventory, less outstanding borrowings, letters of credit and certain designated reserves. As
of December 31, 2017, the available additional borrowing capacity under the ABL Facility was approximately $316.5
million. As of December 31, 2017, the Company held $10.1 million in outstanding letters of credit.

Financing and other related costs incurred in connection with the ABL Facility are reflected in other non-current

assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized over the ABL Facility term. In conjunction with the ABL
Facility amendment noted above, the Company recognized a charge of $1.9 million to interest expense, net, in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations, for the write-off of a portion of the previously deferred financing costs associated
with lenders in the original ABL Facility that exited the amended ABL Facility. In addition, the Company incurred and
deferred $2.0 million of new financing costs associated with this transaction, reflected in other non-current assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, which will be amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the amended term of
the ABL Facility. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, interest expense, net in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations included $2.6 million, $5.6 million and $4.4 million, respectively, of amortization and write-off of
deferred financing fees.

Equipment Capital Lease Obligations

See Note 7, Leases, for additional information regarding the Company's equipment capital lease obligations.

6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENT, HEDGING ACTIVITIES AND RISK MANAGEMENT

Financial Risk Management Policy

The Company’s indebtedness under its financing arrangement creates interest rate risk. The Company’s objective is

to reduce, where it is deemed appropriate to do so, fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in the
interest rate. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

This interest rate exposure is actively monitored by management, and in July 2015, the Company entered into an

interest rate cap agreement. The interest rate cap effectively limits the floating LIBOR-based portion of the interest rate. The
effective date of the interest rate cap agreement was July 31, 2015 with an expiration date of July 1, 2019. The initial
notional amount of this agreement covered $392.9 million of the Company’s floating-rate debt at 3.0% plus the applicable
credit spread. The Company paid $2.0 million for the interest rate cap agreement. Approximately $0.6 million of the amount
paid represented transaction costs and was expensed immediately to earnings. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31,
2016, the interest rate cap agreement had a fair value that was not significant, classified within other non-current assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value is estimated using observable market-based inputs including interest rate curves
and implied volatilities (Level 2).

The Company designated the interest rate cap as a cash flow hedge of exposure to changes in cash flows due to

The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and, in the event of nonperformance, to

market risk for changes in the interest rate. The Company attempts to manage exposure to counterparty credit risk primarily
by selecting only those counterparties that meet certain credit and other financial standards. The Company believes there has
been no material change in the creditworthiness of its counterparty and believes the risk of nonperformance by such party is
minimal.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments

The interest rate cap agreement is subject to Accounting Standards Codification 815, Accounting for Derivative and

Hedging Transactions. For those instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must
designate the instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge or a hedge of a net
investment in a foreign operation.

A cash flow hedge refers to hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to a

particular risk. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the
gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of AOCL until reclassified into earnings in the same
period the hedged transaction affects earnings. The gain or loss on the ineffective portion, if any, is immediately recognized
in earnings. The ineffective portion was not significant for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized an after-tax loss of $0.0 million,
$0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in other comprehensive income associated with the interest rate cap. For the year
ended December 31, 2017, $0.2 million was reclassified from AOCL into earnings. There were no reclassifications from
AOCL into earnings for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount the Company expects to
reclassify from AOCL into earnings within the following twelve months is approximately $0.7 million.

7. LEASES

Lease Commitments

Future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Financing Obligations
and Equipment
Capital Leases (1)

Lease
Obligations

Sublease
Income

Total

Operating Leases

12.8
5.0
4.6
4.0
3.8
22.4
52.6
(12.5)

94.3
80.3
70.4
57.7
45.8
135.6
484.1
—

40.1

484.1

(0.2) $
(0.2)
—
—
—
—
(0.4)
—

(0.4) $

94.1
80.1
70.4
57.7
45.8
135.6
483.7
—

483.7

(in millions)
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter

Amount representing interest
Total future minimum lease
payments
(1) Amounts shown include the financing obligations to related party.

Financing Obligations to Related Party

In connection with Bain Capital Fund VII, L.P.’s acquisition of its 60% interest in UWWH on November 27, 2002,
Unisource transferred 40 of its U.S. warehouse and distribution facilities (the "Properties") to Georgia-Pacific who then sold
38 of the Properties to an unrelated third-party (the "Purchaser/Landlord"). Contemporaneously with the sale, Georgia-
Pacific entered into lease agreements with the Purchaser/Landlord with respect to the individual 38 Properties and
concurrently entered into sublease agreements with Unisource, which are set to expire in June 2018. As a result of certain
forms of continuing involvement, these transactions did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. Accordingly, the leases
were classified as financing transactions. From the Merger through December 31, 2017, the Company has terminated
agreements for 11 of these Properties. At the end of the lease term, the net remaining financing obligation of $155.2 million
will be settled by the return of the assets to the Purchaser/Landlord.

The lease and sublease agreements also include rent schedules and escalation clauses throughout the lease and

sublease terms. Subject to certain conditions, the Company has the right to sublease any of the Properties. Under the terms
of the lease and sublease agreements, Georgia-Pacific and the Company are responsible for all costs and expenses associated
with the Properties, including the operation, maintenance and repair, taxes and insurances. In addition to the obligations
noted above, the Company currently leases from Georgia-Pacific one remaining Property that is directly owned by Georgia-
Pacific and has classified it as an operating lease in accordance with the accounting guidance.

In April 2016, Veritiv assumed ownership of a warehouse and distribution facility located in Austin, Texas that was

subleased from Georgia-Pacific. The Company exercised its right of first refusal and matched a $5.4 million offer from an
unrelated third-party to purchase the facility directly from the owner. This transaction was accounted for as a settlement of

the financing obligation related to the facility. Accordingly, Veritiv recognized a $1.3 million loss on the transaction, which is
reflected in other (income) expense, net, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In May 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement under which Veritiv agreed to sell the
previously acquired Austin, Texas facility to an unrelated third-party. Upon the closing of the sale, Veritiv entered into a lease
of the facility for an initial period of ten years with two optional five-year renewal terms. The sale-leaseback transaction does
not provide for any continuing involvement by the Company other than a normal lease for use of the property during the
lease term. The transaction resulted in net cash proceeds of $9.1 million and a related deferred gain of $5.4 million. The
Company expects to recognize the gain over the initial ten-year lease period on a straight-line basis as a reduction to selling
and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The current portion of the deferred gain is
included in other accrued liabilities and the non-current portion of the deferred gain is included in other non-current liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Operating Leases

Certain properties and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agreements. The Company

recorded rent expense of $106.3 million, $108.1 million and $106.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016
and 2015, respectively.

8. INCOME TAXES

The Company is subject to federal, state and local income taxes in the United States, as well as income taxes in
Canada, Mexico and other foreign jurisdictions. The domestic (United States) and foreign components of the Company's
income (loss) before income taxes were as follows:

(in millions)
Domestic (United States)
Foreign
Income (loss) before income taxes

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2015

2017

(18.0) $
16.1
(1.9) $

27.6
13.2
40.8

46.6
(1.7)
44.9

Income tax expense (benefit) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations consisted of the following:

(in millions)
Current Provision:
U.S. Federal
U.S. State
Foreign
Total current income tax expense

Deferred, net:
U.S. Federal
U.S. State
Foreign
Total deferred, net
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2015

2017

$
$

4.8
1.5
3.2
9.5

16.3
(2.7)
(11.7)
1.9
11.4

$
$

3.6
1.5
3.6
8.7

9.6
1.9
(0.4)
11.1
19.8

$
$

—
1.7
1.6
3.3

14.8
0.5
(0.4)
14.9
18.2

Reconciliation between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate is as follows (see Note 9, Related Party

Transactions for additional information related to the Tax Receivable Agreement):

(in millions)
Income (loss) before income taxes
Statutory U.S. income tax rate
Tax expense using statutory U.S. income tax rate
Foreign income tax rate differential
State tax (net of federal benefit)
Non-deductible expenses
Tax Receivable Agreement (a)
Tax credits (b)
Foreign exchange loss (c)
Impact of U.S. Tax Act (Federal and State)
Change in valuation allowance - U.S. Federal and State (d)
Change in valuation allowance - Foreign

Goodwill impairment

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2015

2017

(1.9)
35.0 %
(0.7)
(1.4)
(0.5)
2.2
(3.8)
(4.0)
—
30.2
—
(13.7)

2.1

40.8
35.0%
14.3
(1.1)
2.8
2.3
1.6
—
—
—
—
(0.5)

—

44.9
35.0%
15.7
0.2
1.6
1.5
0.7
—
(1.2)
—
(0.8)
1.7

0.7

Foreign taxes
Other (e)
(2.0)
18.2
Income tax provision (benefit)
Effective income tax rate
40.5%
(a) Includes a $4.7 million tax rate benefit for the federal tax rate change as part of the Tax Act and a $0.9 million tax rate increase for other fair value changes
in 2017.
(b) Includes a $3.1 million benefit for credits related to foreign taxes and research and experimentation activities recognized in conjunction with the third
quarter of 2017 filing of Veritiv’s 2016 U.S. federal tax return and amended 2015 and 2014 U.S. federal tax returns.
(c) Recognition of a 2015 U.S. tax benefit with respect to a foreign exchange loss on the capitalization of an intercompany loan with the Company's Canadian
subsidiary.
(d) Increase in Section 382 limitation resulting from recognition of 2015 built-in gains.
(e) In 2015, Other primarily relates to tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions, taxes allocated to comprehensive income, adjustments for prior year tax
matters and fuel tax credits.

0.3
11.4
(600.0)%

(0.1)
19.8
48.5%

0.1

0.5

The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S.

tax code, including, but not limited to reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, implementation of a
territorial tax system and a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries that is payable
over eight years. Veritiv recognized the tax effects of the Tax Act in the year ended December 31, 2017 and recorded $30.2
million in provisional tax expense, of which $23.0 million related primarily to the remeasurement of the Company's deferred
taxes to the 21% tax rate and $7.2 million related to the one-time transition tax.

On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) was issued to address the application of

U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed
(including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. In
accordance with SAB 118, the Company has determined that remeasurement of its deferred tax assets and liabilities, one-time
transition tax, impact of the Tax Act on state taxes, and tax liability associated with investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries
where book basis exceeds tax basis are provisional amounts and reasonable estimates at December 31, 2017. The impact of
the Tax Act may differ from this estimate, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations and
assumptions the Company has made, guidance that may be issued, completion of the Company's 2017 U.S. federal and state
tax returns in 2018, completion of earnings and profits and foreign income tax calculations for the Company's non-U.S.
subsidiaries, and actions the Company may take as a result of the Tax Act. Additional work is necessary for a more detailed
analysis of Veritiv's deferred tax assets and liabilities and its historical foreign earnings as well as potential correlative
adjustments. The Company has not accounted for the tax impacts related to the Global Intangible Low Tax Income (GILTI),
Base Erosion Anti Abuse Tax or Foreign Derived Intangible Income regimes or any of the other provisions of the Tax Act that
are not effective until fiscal year 2018. Additionally, the Company has not concluded on any applicable accounting policy
election associated with GILTI. Any subsequent adjustment to these amounts will be recorded to tax expense in the quarter
of 2018 when the analysis is complete.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

U.S.

Non-U.S.

U.S.

Non-U.S.

(in millions)
Deferred income tax assets:
Accrued compensation
Financing obligations to related party
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
Long-term compensation
Net operating losses and credit carryforwards
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Other
Gross deferred income tax assets
Less valuation allowance

Total deferred tax asset

Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property and equipment, net
Inventory reserve
Other

Total deferred tax liability
Net deferred income tax asset

11.6
47.3
1.9
21.3
44.9
10.0
5.6
142.6
(4.7)
137.9

(54.2)
(33.5)
(4.6)
(92.3)
45.6

Deferred income tax asset valuation allowance is as follows:

(in millions)

U.S.

Balance at December 31, 2015

Additions

Subtractions

Currency translation adjustments

Balance at December 31, 2016

6.3

0.2

—

6.5

0.2
0.8
—
4.1
11.8
0.1
0.6
17.6
(3.6)
14.0

—
—
—
—
14.0

17.7
77.5
4.6
21.2
74.1
11.9
3.5
210.5
(6.5)
204.0

(86.7)
(48.2)
(8.3)
(143.2)
60.8

0.1
0.8
—
3.8
13.6
—
0.8
19.1
(18.1)
1.0

—
—
—
—
1.0

Non-U.S.

Total

15.5

3.4
(0.9)
0.1

18.1

21.8

3.6
(0.9)
0.1

24.6

Additions
Subtractions (a)
Currency translation adjustments
Balance at December 31, 2017
(a) Includes a $13.4 million benefit for release of the valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets in Canada reflecting the
Company’s cumulative recent income and improved expectation of future taxable income.

0.2
(16.0)
1.3
3.6

0.2
(17.8)
1.3
8.3

—
4.7

(1.8)

—

The Merger resulted in a significant change in the ownership of the Company, which, pursuant to the Internal

Revenue Code Section 382, imposes annual limits on the Company’s ability to utilize its U.S. federal and state net operating
loss carryforwards ("NOLs"). The Company’s NOLs will continue to be available to offset taxable income (until such NOLs
are either utilized or expire) subject to the Section 382 annual limitation. This limitation is increased for built-in gains
recognized within a 60-month period following the ownership change to the extent of total unrealized built-in gains. If the
annual limitation amount is not fully utilized in a particular tax year, then the unused portion from that particular tax year will
be added to the annual limitation in subsequent years.

In general, it is the practice and intention of Veritiv to reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in those

operations. As of December 31, 2017, Veritiv’s tax basis exceeded its financial reporting basis in certain investments in non-
U.S. subsidiaries. The Company does not believe these temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and,
therefore, no deferred tax asset has been recognized with respect to these basis differences. Additionally, no deferred tax
liability has been recognized for income and withholding tax liabilities associated with investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries

where book basis exceeds tax basis. The provisional estimate of such temporary differences totaled approximately $25.8
million as of December 31, 2017. The provisional estimate of income and withholding tax liability associated with these
temporary differences is immaterial. Veritiv will record the tax effects of any change in its prior provisional estimates, with
respect to these investments, and disclose any unrecognized deferred tax impact for temporary differences related to its
foreign investments, if practicable, in the period that it is first able to determine a change, but no later than December 31,
2018.

Veritiv applies a "more likely than not" threshold to the recognition and de-recognition of uncertain tax positions. A

change in judgment related to prior years' uncertain tax positions is recognized in the period of such change.

The Company accrues interest on unrecognized tax benefits as a component of interest expense. Penalties, if

incurred, are recognized as a component of income tax expense. Total gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31,
2017, 2016 and 2015, as well as activity within each of the years, was not material.

In the U.S., Veritiv is generally subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for fiscal years 2014

and later and certain states for fiscal years 2013 and later; however, it may be subject to IRS and state tax authority
adjustments for years prior to 2014 to the extent of losses or other tax attributes carrying forward from the earlier years.
Veritiv Canada remains subject to examination by the Canadian Revenue Agency and certain provinces for fiscal years 2012
and later.

As of December 31, 2017, Veritiv has federal, state and foreign income tax NOLs available to offset future taxable

income of $167.1 million, $165.5 million and $49.2 million, respectively, which will expire at various dates from 2018
through 2035, with the exception of certain foreign NOLs that do not expire but have a full valuation allowance.

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Agreements with the UWWH Stockholder

On the Distribution Date the UWWH Stockholder, the sole shareholder of UWWH, received 7.84 million shares of

Veritiv common stock for all outstanding shares of UWWH common stock that it held in a private placement transaction.
Additionally, Veritiv and the UWWH Stockholder executed the following agreements:

• Registration Rights Agreement: The Registration Rights Agreement provides the UWWH Stockholder with certain

demand and piggyback registration rights. Under this Agreement, the UWWH Stockholder is also entitled to transfer its
Veritiv common stock to one or more of its affiliates or equity-holders and may exercise registration rights on behalf of
such transferees if such transferees become a party to the Registration Rights Agreement. The UWWH Stockholder, on
behalf of the holders of shares of Veritiv’s common stock that are party to the Registration Rights Agreement, under
certain circumstances and provided certain thresholds described in the Registration Rights Agreement are met, may make
a written request to the Company for the registration of the offer and sale of all or part of the shares subject to such
registration rights. If the Company registers the offer and sale of its common stock (other than pursuant to a demand
registration or in connection with registration on Form S-4 and Form S-8 or any successor or similar forms, or relating
solely to the sale of debt or convertible debt instruments) either on its behalf or on the behalf of other security holders,
the holders of the registration rights under the Registration Rights Agreement are entitled to include their shares in such
registration. The demand rights described commenced 180 days after the Distribution Date. Veritiv is not required to
effect more than one demand registration in any 150-day period or more than two demand registrations in any 365-day
period. If Veritiv believes that a registration or an offering would materially affect a significant transaction or would
require it to disclose confidential information which it in good faith believes would be adverse to its interest, then Veritiv
may delay a registration or filing for no more than 120 days in a 360-day period.

• Tax Receivable Agreement: The Tax Receivable Agreement sets forth the terms by which Veritiv generally will be

obligated to pay the UWWH Stockholder an amount equal to 85% of the U.S. federal, state and Canadian income tax
savings that Veritiv actually realizes as a result of the utilization of Unisource's net operating losses attributable to
taxable periods prior to the date of the Merger. For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, Veritiv’s income tax
savings will generally be computed by comparing Veritiv’s actual aggregate U.S. federal, state and Canadian income tax
liability for taxable periods (or portions thereof) beginning after the date of the Merger to the amount of Veritiv’s
aggregate U.S. federal, state and Canadian income tax liability for the same periods had Veritiv not been able to utilize
Unisource's net operating losses attributable to taxable periods prior to the date of the Merger. Veritiv will pay to the

UWWH Stockholder an amount equal to 85% of such tax savings, plus interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.00%, computed
from the earlier of the date that Veritiv files its U.S. federal income tax return for the applicable taxable year and the date
that such tax return is due (without extensions) until payments are made. Under the Tax Receivable Agreement, the
UWWH Stockholder will not be required to reimburse Veritiv for any payments previously made if such tax benefits are
subsequently disallowed or adjusted (although future payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement would be adjusted
to the extent possible to reflect the result of such disallowance or adjustment). The Tax Receivable Agreement will be
binding on and adapt to the benefit of any permitted assignees of the UWWH Stockholder and to any successors to any
of the parties of the Tax Receivable Agreement to the same extent as if such permitted assignee or successor had been an
original party to the Tax Receivable Agreement. In January 2018 and 2017, Veritiv paid $10.1 million and $8.7 million,
respectively, in principal and interest, to the UWWH Stockholder for the utilization of pre-merger NOLs in its 2016 and
2015 federal and state tax returns, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the Tax Receivable Agreement was revalued
for the Tax Act change, lowering the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. This change reduced the value of
the Tax Receivable Agreement liability by $13.5 million.

On November 23, 2016, the UWWH Stockholder sold 1.76 million shares of Veritiv common stock in an
underwritten public offering. Concurrently with the closing of the offering, Veritiv repurchased 0.31 million of these offered
shares from the underwriters at a price of $42.8625 per share, which is the price at which the underwriters purchased such
shares from the selling stockholder, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $13.4 million. In conjunction with
these transactions, Veritiv incurred approximately $0.8 million in transaction-related fees, of which approximately $0.2
million was capitalized as part of the cost to acquire the treasury stock with the remainder included in selling and
administrative expense, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On March 22, 2017, the UWWH Stockholder sold 1.80 million shares of Veritiv common stock in a block trade.
The Company did not sell any shares and did not receive any of the proceeds. In conjunction with this transaction, Veritiv
incurred approximately $0.2 million in transaction-related fees, which were included in selling and administrative expenses
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The UWWH Stockholder beneficially owned 4,283,840 shares of Veritiv's
outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2017.

Transactions with Georgia-Pacific

Veritiv purchases certain inventory items from, and sells certain inventory items to, Georgia-Pacific in the normal
course of business. As a result of the Merger and related private placement, Georgia-Pacific, as joint owner of the UWWH
Stockholder, is a related party. The following table summarizes the financial impact of these related party transactions with
Georgia Pacific:

(in millions)

Sales to Georgia-Pacific, reflected in net sales
Purchases of inventory from Georgia-Pacific, recognized in cost
of products sold

Inventories purchased from Georgia-Pacific that remained on
Veritiv's balance sheet
Related party payable to Georgia-Pacific

Related party receivable from Georgia-Pacific

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

32.2

181.6

22.7

8.5

3.3

35.6

224.9

33.6

264.7

24.8

9.0

3.9

See Note 7, Leases, for information on the Company's financing obligations to Georgia-Pacific.

Separation Agreements with Former Unisource CEO

Effective as of the Distribution Date, Allan R. Dragone, Jr. ceased to be the Chief Executive Officer of Unisource

and became a member of Veritiv’s Board of Directors. Under his then existing employment agreement with Unisource, Mr.
Dragone was entitled to receive severance benefits, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims
against Unisource, the Company and International Paper. As part of his employment agreement, Mr. Dragone exercised his
right to sell his personal residence to the Company. The Company completed the purchase of the residence for $4.6 million
and subsequently sold the residence for $4.6 million during 2015.

10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plans

Veritiv sponsors qualified defined contribution plans covering its employees in the U.S. and Canada. The defined

contribution plans allow eligible employees to contribute a portion of their eligible compensation (including salary and
annual incentive plan bonus) to the plans and Veritiv makes matching contributions to participant accounts on a specified
percentage of employee deferrals as determined by the provisions of each plan. During the years ended December 31, 2017,
2016 and 2015 Veritiv's contributions to these plans totaled $19.4 million, $19.6 million and $19.0 million, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Savings Plans

In conjunction with the Merger, Veritiv assumed responsibility for Unisource's legacy deferred compensation plans.
In general, the payout terms varied for each employee agreement and are paid in monthly or annual installments ranging up to
15 years from the date of eligibility.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company adopted the Veritiv Deferred Compensation Savings Plan which provides

for the deferral of salaries, commissions or bonuses of eligible non-union employees and the deferral of cash and equity
retainers for non-employee members of the Company's Board of Directors. Under this plan, eligible employees may elect to
defer up to 85% of their base salary, commissions and annual incentive bonus. The amounts deferred are credited to notional
investment accounts selected by participants. At the time a deferral election is made, participants elect to receive payout of
the deferred amounts upon termination of employment or termination of Board service in the form of a lump sum or equal
annual installments ranging from two to ten years. Currently, Veritiv does not make matching contributions to this plan.

The liabilities associated with these plans are summarized in the table below.

Deferred Compensation Liability

(in millions)

Other accrued liabilities

Other non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Defined Benefit Plans

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

2.6

23.7

26.3

2.7

21.6

24.3

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, Veritiv did not maintain any active defined benefit plans for its non-union

employees.

Benefit Obligations and Funded Status

The following table provides information about Veritiv's U.S. and Canadian defined benefit pension and SERP

plans:

(in millions)

Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year

Change in projected benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation, beginning of year

Service cost

Interest cost

Actuarial (gain) loss

Benefits paid

Foreign exchange adjustments

Projected benefit obligation, end of year

Change in plan assets:

Plan assets, beginning of year
Employer contributions

Investment returns

Benefits paid

Administrative expenses paid

Foreign exchange adjustments

Plan assets, end of year

Underfunded status, end of year

Balance Sheet Positions

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

U.S.

Canada

U.S.

Canada

91.0

83.2

89.7

71.9

89.7

79.0

89.0

0.8

2.7

3.3
(5.5)
—

0.3

2.7

6.1
(3.9)
5.8

0.7

3.4

—
(3.4)
—

91.0

90.0

89.7

75.9

64.9

74.4

—

12.0
(5.5)
(1.0)
—

3.1

6.0
(3.9)
—

4.8

—

5.9
(3.4)
(1.0)
—

81.4
$
(9.6) $

74.9
$
(15.1) $

75.9
$
(13.8) $

76.0

0.3

3.1

2.2
(4.8)
2.2

79.0

61.6

3.1

3.1
(4.8)
—

1.9

64.9
(14.1)

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(in millions)

U.S.

Canada

U.S.

Canada

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets

consist of:

Other accrued liabilities

Defined benefit pension obligations

Net liability recognized

0.1

9.5

9.6

0.2

14.9

15.1

0.1

13.7

13.8

0.2

13.9

14.1

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(in millions)

U.S.

Canada

U.S.

Canada

Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and

included in AOCL consist of:

Net loss, net of tax

3.2

6.1

5.7

3.4

Net Periodic Cost

Total net periodic benefit cost associated with the defined benefit pension and SERP plans is summarized below:

2017

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2015

(in millions)

U.S.

Canada

U.S.

Canada

U.S.

Canada

Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit):

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of net loss
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)

2.0
2.7
(5.1)
0.1
(0.3) $

0.3
2.7
(3.7)
0.2
(0.5) $

1.7
3.4
(5.0)
0.1
0.2

0.3
3.1
(3.5)
0.2
0.1

1.6
3.2
(5.2)
—
(0.4) $

0.2
3.2
(3.3)
—
0.1

Changes to funded status recognized in other

comprehensive (income) loss:
Net loss (gain) during year, net of tax

(2.5) $

2.7

(0.5) $

2.2

1.0

(1.0)

Amounts are generally amortized from AOCL over the expected future working lifetime of active plan participants.

The amount Veritiv expects to amortize from AOCL into net periodic pension cost in 2017 is not significant.

Fair Value of Plan Assets

U.S. and Canada pension plan assets are primarily invested in broad-based mutual funds and pooled funds
comprised of U.S. and non-U.S. equities, U.S. and non-U.S. high-quality and high-yield fixed income securities, and short-
term interest bearing securities or deposits.

The underlying investments of the U.S. plan assets are valued using quoted prices in active markets (Level 1). The
underlying investments of the Canada plan assets in equity and fixed income securities are measured at fair value using the
Net Asset Value ("NAV") provided by the administrator of the fund and the Company has the ability to redeem such assets at
the measurement date or within the near term without redemption restrictions. In accordance with ASU 2015-07, "Fair Value
Measurement (Topic 820)", investments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share practical expedient have not
been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The following tables present Veritiv’s plan assets using the fair value hierarchy
which is reconciled to the amounts presented for the total pension benefit plan assets as of December 31:

As of December 31, 2017
(in millions)

Investments – U.S.:
Equity securities

Fixed income securities

Cash and short-term securities

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

56.8

24.3

0.3

56.8

24.3

0.3

81.4

— $

—

— $

—

As of December 31, 2017
(in millions)

Investments – Canada:

Cash and short-term securities

Investments measured at NAV:

Equity securities

Fixed income securities

Total

As of December 31, 2016
(in millions)

Investments – U.S.:
Equity securities

Fixed income securities

Cash and short-term securities

Total

As of December 31, 2016
(in millions)

Investments – Canada:

Cash and short-term securities

Investments measured at NAV:

Equity securities

Fixed income securities

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

0.1

— $

49.2

25.6

74.9

50.0

25.7

0.2

Total

0.1

— $

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

50.0

25.7

0.2

— $

—

— $

75.9

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

0.3

— $

43.8

20.8

64.9

0.3

— $

—

The classification of fair value measurements within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is

significant to the measurement. Valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value are as follows:

* Equity Securities: Commingled funds are valued at the net asset value of units held at year end, as determined by
a pricing vendor or the fund family. Mutual funds are valued at the net asset value of shares held at year end, as determined
by the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded, or a pricing vendor or the
fund family if an active market is not available.

* Fixed Income Securities: Mutual funds are valued at the net asset value of shares held at year end, as determined

by the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded, or a pricing vendor or the
fund family if an active market is not available.

* Cash and Short-term Securities: Cash and cash equivalents consist of U.S. and foreign currencies. Foreign
currencies are reported in U.S. dollars based on currency exchange rates readily available in active markets. Short-term
securities are valued at the net asset value of units held at year end.

The weighted-average asset allocations of invested assets within Veritiv’s defined benefit pension plans were as

follows:

As of December 31, 2017
(in millions)

Equity securities

Fixed income securities

Cash and short-term securities

Total

As of December 31, 2016
(in millions)

Equity securities

Fixed income securities

Cash and short-term securities

Total

U.S.

Canada

56.8

24.3

0.3

81.4

U.S.

Canada

50.0

25.7

0.2

75.9

49.2

25.6

0.1

74.9

43.8

20.8

0.3

64.9

Asset Allocation Range

U.S.

55 - 75%

20 - 40%

0 - 10%

Canada

50 - 70%

30 - 50%

0 - 5%

Asset Allocation Range

U.S.

55 - 75%

20 - 40%

0 - 10%

Canada

50 - 70%

30 - 50%

0 - 5%

Veritiv's investment objectives include maximizing long-term returns at acceptable risk levels, diversifying among

asset classes, as applicable, and among investment managers as well as establishing certain risk parameters within asset
classes.

Investment performance is evaluated at least quarterly. Total returns are compared to the weighted-average return of

a benchmark mix of investments. Individual fund investments are compared to historical 3, 5 and 10 year returns achieved
by funds with similar investment objectives.

Assumptions

The determination of Veritiv’s defined benefit obligations and pension expense is based on various assumptions,

such as discount rates, expected long-term rates of return, rate of compensation increases, employee retirement patterns and
payment selections, inflation, and mortality rates.

Veritiv's weighted-average discount rates for its U.S. plans were determined by using cash flow matching techniques

whereby the rates of yield curves, developed from U.S. corporate yield curves, were applied to the benefit obligations to
determine the appropriate discount rate. Veritiv's weighted-average discount rates for its Canadian plans were determined by
using spot rates from yield curves, developed from high-quality bonds (rated AA or higher) by established rating agencies,
matching the duration of the future expected benefit obligations.

Veritiv’s weighted-average expected rate of return was developed based on several factors, including projected and

historical rates of returns, investment allocations of pension plan assets and inflation expectations. Veritiv evaluates the
expected rate of return assumptions on an annual basis.

The following table presents significant weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit obligations:

Discount rate

Rate of compensation increases

December 31,

2017

2016

U.S.

Canada

U.S.

Canada

3.33%

N/A

3.40%

3.00%

3.76%

N/A

3.85%

3.00%

The following table presents significant weighted-average assumptions used in computing net periodic benefit cost:

Discount rate

Rate of compensation increases

Expected long-term rate of return on assets

Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

U.S.

Canada

U.S.

Canada

3.76%

N/A

7.15%

3.85%

3.00%

5.50%

4.05%

N/A

7.15%

4.00%

3.00%

5.50%

Veritiv expects to contribute $0.1 million and $3.2 million to its U.S. and Canadian defined benefit pension and

SERP plans, respectively, during 2018. Future benefit payments under the defined benefit pension and SERP plans are
estimated as follows:

(in millions)

U.S.

Canada

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023-2027

9.6

5.7

5.4

5.6

5.5

27.7

2.8

2.9

3.0

3.2

3.4

20.1

Multi-employer Plans

Veritiv's contributions to multi-employer plans were $3.5 million, $3.7 million and $3.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. It is reasonably possible that changes to Veritiv employees covered under
these plans might result in additional contribution obligations. Any such obligations would be governed by the specific
agreement between Veritiv and any such plan. Veritiv's contributions did not represent more than 5% of total contributions to
any multi-employer plans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. At the date these Consolidated Financial
Statements were issued, Forms 5500 were not available for the plan years ending in 2017.

The risks of participating in these multi-employer pension plans are different from a single employer plan in the

following aspects:

• Assets contributed to the multi-employer plans by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of

•

other participating employers,
If a participating employer ceases contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be inherited by
the remaining participating employers, and
If the Company stops participating in any of the multi-employer plans, the Company may be required to pay those
plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

The Company has recorded undiscounted charges related to the complete or partial withdrawal from various multi-
employer pension plans. Charges not related to the Company's restructuring efforts are recorded as distribution expenses.
Initial amounts are recorded as other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See the table below for a
summary of the net charges and the year-end balance sheet liability positions for the respective years ended December 31:

(in millions)

2017

2016

(in millions)

2017

2016

Year Ended December 31,

Restructuring
charges, net

Distribution expenses

Total Net Charges

17.4

7.5

At December 31,

2.1

2.3

19.5

9.8

Other accrued
liabilities

Other non-current
liabilities

0.7

0.0

27.2

9.8

Included in the previously mentioned multi-employer pension plan withdrawal charges is $13.6 million related to
the New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund (the “NE Fund”), a multi-employer pension plan. During
the second quarter of 2017, the Company was presented with a Demand for Payment of Withdrawal Liability from the NE
Fund attributable to the closure of the Company's Wilmington, Massachusetts facility in the amount of $10.9 million, payable
in 240 equal monthly installments beginning in August 2017. Also as part of this same consolidation, the Company's
Windsor and Middletown, Connecticut facilities were closed and relocated to Enfield, Connecticut. Employees at both the
Windsor and Middletown locations were covered by separate collective bargaining agreements. Employees at the
Middletown location subject to that agreement also participate in the NE Fund. The Company entered into a new collective
bargaining agreement for the Enfield, Connecticut facility to replace the legacy Windsor and Middletown, Connecticut
agreements. The new agreement ended participation in the NE Fund. As a result, in December 2017, the Company received
another Demand for Payment of Withdrawal Liability from the NE Fund attributable to that negotiated exit in the amount of
$2.7 million, payable in 240 equal monthly installments beginning in February 2018.

See Note 3, Acquisition, Integration and Restructuring Charges, for additional information regarding these

transactions. The Company records an estimated undiscounted charge when it becomes probable that it has incurred a
withdrawal liability. Final charges for these withdrawals will not be known until the plans issue their respective
determinations. As a result, these estimates may increase or decrease depending upon the final determinations. Currently, the
Company expects payments will occur over an approximately 20-year period. The Company expects to incur similar types of
charges in future periods in connection with its ongoing restructuring activities. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has
received determination letters from two plans. Of those, the liability for one was settled with a lump sum payment, while
monthly payments for the other plan are expected to occur over an approximately 20-year period.

Veritiv’s participation in the multi-employer plans for the year ended December 31, 2017 is outlined in the table

below. The "EIN/Pension Plan Number" column provides the Employee Identification Number and the three-digit plan
number, if applicable. The Pension Protection Act zone listed below is based on the latest information Veritiv received from
the plan and is certified by the plan’s actuary. Plans in the red zone are generally less than 65% funded, plans in the yellow
zone are less than 80% funded and plans in the green zone are at least 80% funded. There were no changes in the status of
any zones in 2017. The "FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented" column indicates plans for which a financial improvement
plan or a rehabilitation plan is either pending or has been implemented. The last column lists the expiration date(s) of the
collective-bargaining agreement(s). Contributions in the table below, for the year ended December 31, 2017 exclude $1.4
million related to payments made for accrued withdrawal liabilities.

EIN/Pension
Plan No.

Pension
Protection
Act Zone
Status

FIP/RP
Status
Pending/
Implemented

Veritiv's
Contributions

2017

2016

2015

Surcharge
Imposed

916145047/001

Green

$ 1.6

$ 1.7

366044243/001

Red

Implemented

0.2

0.3

0.4

231511735/001

Yellow

Implemented

0.4

521074215/001

046372430/001

Red

Implemented

—

0.1

Implemented

0.4

0.5

0.4

Yes

256029946/001

Red

Implemented

0.3

Yes

Expiration
Date(s) of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement(s)

7/31/2017 -
10/31/2020

7/31/2018

3/31/2018 &
7/31/2018

Exited during
2016

Exited during
2017

3/31/2019 &
3/31/2020

2.9

3.2

3.3

0.6

0.5

0.6

$ 3.5

$ 3.7

$ 3.9

Pension Fund

Western Conference of
Teamsters Pension Trust
Fund (1)

Central States, Southeast &
Southwest Areas Pension
Fund (2)

Teamsters Pension Plan of
Philadelphia & Vicinity

Graphic Arts Industry Joint
Pension Trust

New England Teamsters &
Trucking Industry Pension

Western Pennsylvania
Teamsters and Employers
Pension Plan

Contributions for
individually significant
plans

Contributions to other multi-
employer plans

Total contributions

(1) As of December 31, 2017, there were 11 collective bargaining units participating in the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust. As of December
31, 2017, one was then in negotiations.
(2) As of December 31, 2017, there was one collective bargaining unit participating in the Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund. As of
December 31, 2017, it was not then in negotiations.

11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the carrying amounts of cash, receivables, payables and other components of other

current assets and other current liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these items.

Borrowings under the ABL Facility are at variable market interest rates, and accordingly, the carrying amount

approximates fair value.

The fair value of the interest rate cap was derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the

agreement and Level 2 data for the forward interest rate curve adjusted for the Company’s credit risk. See Note 6, Derivative
Instrument, Hedging Activities and Risk Management, for additional information on the interest rate cap agreement.

The fair value analysis for the goodwill and intangible asset impairments described in Note 4, Goodwill and Other

Intangible Assets, and Note 1, Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, respectively, relied upon both
Level 2 data (publicly observable data such as market interest rates, the Company’s stock price, the stock prices of peer
companies and the capital structures of peer companies) and Level 3 data (internal data such as the Company’s operating and
cash flow projections).

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company reviewed its intangible assets for possible impairment indicators, and

management determined that the carrying values of the goodwill and customer relationship intangible assets allocated to the
logistics solutions business were fully impaired. The impairments were determined after a review of the business's forecasted
revenues and estimated cash flows (Level 3 data). The impairment charges were primarily a result of lower forecasted sales
growth due to changes in the Company's growth strategy and margin compression due to increased competition. The fair
value of these assets was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs. As a result, the Company
recorded $7.7 million in non-restructuring impairment charges related to its logistics solutions business's goodwill and
customer relationship intangible assets, included in selling and administrative expenses, on the Consolidated Statements of

Operations. See Note 4, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for additional information regarding the Company's goodwill
and other intangible assets.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized $5.8 million in intangible asset impairment

charges related to its Print and Publishing segments' customer relationship intangible assets, included in selling and
administrative expenses, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The impairments were determined after review of
the segments' forecasted revenues and estimated cash flows (Level 3). As a result, the entire carrying values were deemed
impaired.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized a $1.9 million goodwill impairment charge for its
Facility Solutions segment and $3.3 million in asset impairment charges related to property, plant and equipment disposed of
as part of its restructuring efforts. The goodwill impairment charge is included in selling and administrative expense and the
property, plant and equipment impairment charge is included in restructuring charges, net on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no impairments charged to restructuring expense. The Company

has on occasion recognized other minor impairments when warranted as part of its normal review of long-lived assets and
these impairments are included in selling and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Total
goodwill and long-lived asset impairments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $8.4 million, $7.7
million and $5.9 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the pension plan assets were primarily comprised of mutual funds and pooled

funds. The underlying investments of these funds were valued using either quoted prices in active markets or valued as of the
most recent trade date. See Note 10, Employee Benefits Plans, for further detail.

At the time of the Merger, the Company recorded a $59.4 million contingent liability associated with the Tax

Receivable Agreement at fair value using a discounted cash flow model that reflected management's expectations about
probability of payment. The fair value of the Tax Receivable Agreement is a Level 3 measurement which relied upon both
Level 2 data (publicly observable data such as market interest rates) and Level 3 data (internal data such as the Company’s
projected revenues, taxable income and assumptions about the utilization of Unisource’s net operating losses, attributable to
taxable periods prior to the Merger, by the Company). The amount payable under the Tax Receivable Agreement is
contingent on the Company generating a certain level of taxable income prior to the expiration of the NOL carryforwards.
Moreover, future trading of Company stock by significant shareholders may result in additional ownership changes as
defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, further limiting the use of Unisource's NOLs and the amount
ultimately payable under the Tax Receivable Agreement. The contingent liability is remeasured at fair value at each reporting
period with the change in fair value recognized in other (income) expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
At December 31, 2017, the Company remeasured the contingent liability using a discount rate of 4.2% (Moody's daily long-
term corporate BAA bond yield). There have been no transfers between the fair value measurement levels for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company recognizes transfers between the fair value measurement levels at the
end of the reporting period. See Note 9, Related Party Transactions, for further discussion of the Tax Receivable Agreement.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of the Tax Receivable Agreement

("TRA") contingent liability for the year ended December 31, 2017:

(in millions)

Balance at December 31, 2015

Change in fair value adjustment recorded in other (income) expense, net

Balance at December 31, 2016
Change in fair value adjustment recorded in other (income) expense, net (a)
Principal payments

Balance at December 31, 2017
(a)

change in the table above.

TRA Contingent Liability

63.0

4.9

67.9
(9.4)
(8.5)
50.0

The Tax Act lowered the U.S. federal corporate tax rate to 21%, which resulted in a fair value reduction of $13.5 million included in the 2017 fair value

The preliminary purchase price allocation for the acquisition of AAC, described in Note 2, 2017 Acquisition,
includes $22.2 million for the estimated fair value of contingent consideration. The maximum amount payable for the
contingent consideration is $50.0 million, with up to $25.0 million payable at each of the first and second anniversaries of the
Acquisition Date. The final amount will be determined based on actual growth rates in revenue and gross profit. The
preliminary fair value estimate was based on historic growth patterns and future forecasts, which are Level 3 data. The
valuation of contingent consideration uses assumptions and estimates to forecast a range of outcomes and probabilities for the
contingent consideration. The contingent consideration is valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The Company will
assess these assumptions and estimates on a quarterly basis as additional data impacting the assumptions is obtained. Any
changes in the fair value of contingent consideration related to updated assumptions and estimates will be recognized within
other (income) expense, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the period in which the change occurs.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of the AAC contingent liability

for the year ended December 31, 2017:

(in millions)

Balance at August 31, 2017

Purchase accounting adjustment

Adjusted purchase price

Change in fair value adjustment recorded in other (income) expense, net

Balance at December 31, 2017

12. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION

Other Current Assets

The components of other current assets were as follows:

AAC Contingent Liability

30.0
(7.8)
22.2

2.0

24.2

(in millions)
Rebates receivable

Prepaid expenses

Other

Other current assets

Other Non-Current Assets

The components of other non-current assets were as follows:

(in millions)

Deferred financing costs

Investments in real estate joint ventures

Below market leasehold agreements

Other

Other non-current assets

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

61.1

33.8

38.6

133.5

62.3

26.1

30.5

118.9

December 31,

2017

December 31,
2016

9.3

6.4

4.7

10.4

30.8

11.9

6.0

4.7

7.7

30.3

Accrued Payroll and Benefits

The components of accrued payroll and benefits were as follows:

(in millions)

Accrued payroll and related taxes

Accrued commissions

Accrued incentive plans

Other

Accrued payroll and benefits

Other Accrued Liabilities

The components of other accrued liabilities were as follows:

(in millions)

Accrued taxes

Accrued customer incentives

Accrued freight

Accrued professional fees

Tax Receivable Agreement contingent liability

AAC contingent liability and working capital adjustment

Other

Other accrued liabilities

Other Non-Current Liabilities

The components of other non-current liabilities were as follows:

(in millions)

Tax Receivable Agreement contingent liability

AAC contingent liability
Deferred compensation

Straight-line rent

Above market leasehold agreements

Other, including multi-employer pension plan withdrawals

Other non-current liabilities

13. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

December 31,

2017

December 31,
2016

18.0

23.2

28.7

3.6

73.5

26.0

21.8

33.1

3.5

84.4

December 31,

2017

December 31,
2016

12.1

25.1

16.0

6.7

9.9

18.4

46.4

9.1

23.3

13.9

7.3

8.5

—

40.4

102.5

134.6

December 31,

2017

December 31,
2016

40.1

7.1
23.7

17.5

2.1

46.5

59.4

—
21.6

15.7

3.1

21.4

137.0

121.2

Basic earnings (loss) per share for Veritiv common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the

weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is
similarly calculated, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would
have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued, except where the inclusion of such common
shares would have an anti-dilutive impact.

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

utilized 15.70 million, 15.97 million and 16.00 million shares for basic, respectively, and 15.70 million, 16.15 million and

16.00 million shares for dilutive, respectively, issued and outstanding based on the weighted-average shares outstanding
during this period, with the weighted-average shares outstanding for the diluted earnings per share having been adjusted for
potentially dilutive shares.

See Note 15, Equity-Based Incentive Plans, for additional information.

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

calculations is as follows:

(in millions, except per share data)
Numerator:

Net income (loss)

Denominator:

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2017

2015

(13.3) $

21.0

26.7

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding – basic

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding – diluted

15.70

15.97

16.15

16.00

Earnings (loss) per share:

Basic earnings (loss) per share

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

(0.85) $
(0.85) $

1.31

1.30

Antidilutive stock-based awards excluded from computation of diluted

earnings per share

Performance stock-based awards excluded from computation of diluted
earnings per share because performance conditions had not been met

0.80

0.30

0.06

0.20

1.67

0.10

0.16

14. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Common Stock

Shares Outstanding: On November 23, 2016, the UWWH Stockholder sold 1.76 million shares of Veritiv common
stock in an underwritten public offering. See the "Treasury Stock" section of this footnote below for additional information.
On March 22, 2017, the UWWH Stockholder sold 1.80 million shares of Veritiv common stock in a block trade. The
Company did not sell any shares and did not receive any of the proceeds in these transactions.

Dividends: Each holder of common stock shall be entitled to participate equally in all dividends payable with

respect to the common stock.

Voting Rights: The holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to vote only in the circumstances set forth

in Veritiv's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Each holder of common stock shall be entitled to one vote
for each share of common stock held of record by such holder upon all matters to be voted on by the holders of the common
stock.

Other Rights: Each holder of common stock shall be entitled to share equally, subject to any rights and preferences

of the preferred stock (as fixed by resolutions, if any, of the Board of Directors), in the assets of the Company available for
distribution, in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of Veritiv, or
upon any distribution of the assets of the Company.

Preferred Stock

Subject to the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors of Veritiv
is authorized to provide for the issuance of up to 10.00 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series. The Board of
Directors may fix the number of shares constituting any series and determine the designation of the series, the dividend rates,
rights of priority of dividend payment, the voting powers (if any) of the shares of the series, and the preferences and relative
participating, optional and other rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions, applicable to the shares of
such series. No preferred stock was issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017.

Treasury Stock

In conjunction with the November 2016 UWWH Stockholder offering and related Veritiv stock repurchase, Veritiv
incurred approximately $0.8 million in transaction-related fees, of which approximately $0.2 million was capitalized as part
of the cost to acquire the treasury stock with the remainder included in selling and administrative expense on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company may repurchase additional shares in the future, however, there is
currently no share repurchase authorization plan approved by the Company's Board of Directors. See Note 9, Related Party
Transactions, for additional information regarding these transactions.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive income (loss) is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and

consists of net income (loss) and other gains and losses affecting shareholders' equity that, under U.S. GAAP, are excluded
from net income (loss). AOCL consisted of the following:

(in millions)

Balance at December 31, 2015

Unrealized net losses arising during the period

Amounts reclassified from AOCL

Net current period other comprehensive loss

Balance at December 31, 2016

Unrealized net gains (losses) arising during the period

Amounts reclassified from AOCL

Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)

Balance at December 31, 2017

15. EQUITY-BASED INCENTIVE PLANS

Veritiv Omnibus Incentive Plan

Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments

Retirement
liabilities

Interest
rate swap

AOCL

(27.1) $
(2.1)
—
(2.1)
(29.2)
5.9
(0.2)
5.7
(23.5) $

(7.4) $
(1.8)
0.1
(1.7)
(9.1)
0.1
(0.3)
(0.2)
(9.3) $

(0.5) $
(0.2)
—
(0.2)
(0.7)
(0.1)
0.1

0.0
(0.7) $

(35.0)
(4.1)
0.1
(4.0)
(39.0)
5.9
(0.4)
5.5
(33.5)

Veritiv's 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of March 8, 2017 (the "2014 Plan") provides for

the grant of stock, deferred share units ("DSUs"), restricted stock units ("RSUs"), performance condition share units
("PCSUs"), and market condition performance share units ("MCPSUs"), among other awards. A total of 3.08 million shares
of Veritiv common stock may be issued under the 2014 Plan subject to certain adjustment provisions. As of December 31,
2017, there were approximately 1.3 million shares available to be granted to any employee, director or consultant of Veritiv
or a subsidiary of Veritiv. Grants are made at the discretion of the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of
the Company's Board of Directors.

Stock

The Company made grants of common stock in 2017 to its non-employee directors. The stock grant was fully

vested and non-forfeitable as of the grant date. The non-employee directors were eligible to defer receipt of the award under
the Veritiv Deferred Compensation Plan. The Company recognized $1.1 million in expense related to these grants for the
year ended December 31, 2017.

Deferred Share Units

The Company granted DSUs in 2014, 2015 and 2016 to its non-employee directors. Each DSU is the economical
equivalent of one share of Veritiv's common stock. The DSUs were fully vested and non-forfeitable as of the grant date and
are payable following the individual's termination of service as a Veritiv director. The DSUs granted in 2014 and 2015 are
payable in cash and the DSUs granted in 2016 are settled in stock. The cash-settled DSUs are classified as a non-current
liability and are remeasured at each reporting date, with a corresponding adjustment to compensation expense. At
December 31, 2017 there were approximately 51,900 DSUs outstanding with a fair value of $1.7 million. At December 31,
2016, there were approximately 55,100 DSUs outstanding with a fair value of $3.0 million. The Company recognized $(0.8)
million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million in net expense related to these grants for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015 respectively.

Restricted Stock Units

RSUs are awarded to key employees annually and cliff vest at the end of three years, subject to continued service.
The fair value of the RSU awards is based typically on either the closing price of Veritiv common stock on the date of grant
or the closing price on the trading date immediately prior to the date of grant if the grant date is not a trading date.
Compensation expense for the RSUs is recognized ratably from the grant date to the vesting date.

A summary of activity related to non-vested RSUs is presented below:

(units in thousands)

Non-vested at December 31, 2015

Granted

Vested

Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2016

Granted

Vested

Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2017

Performance Condition Share Units

Number of
RSUs

Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share

98
$
(1) $
(10) $
$
146

111

— $
(8) $
$

249

51.21

36.43

47.71

41.35

42.05

49.86

—

44.21

45.43

PCSUs are awarded to key employees annually and cliff vest at the end of three years, subject to continued service

and the attainment of performance conditions. The PCSU award represents the contingent right to receive a number of shares
equal to a portion, all or a multiple (not to exceed 200%) of the target number of PCSUs. The PCSUs are divided into three
tranches, and each tranche is earned based on the achievement of an annual Adjusted EBITDA target which is set at the
beginning of each of the three years in the vesting period. The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before
interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges, net, acquisition and integration expenses and
other similar charges including any severance costs, costs associated with warehouse and office openings or closings,
consolidation, and relocation and other business optimization expenses, stock-based compensation expense, changes in the
LIFO reserve, non-restructuring asset impairment charges, non-restructuring severance charges, non-restructuring pension
charges, fair value adjustments related to contingent liabilities assumed in mergers and acquisitions and certain other

adjustments. Compensation expense for each tranche is recognized ratably from the date the fair value is determined to the
vesting date for the number of awards expected to vest.

A summary of activity related to non-vested PCSUs is presented below:

(units in thousands)

Non-vested at December 31, 2015

Granted

Shares lost based on actual performance

Vested

Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2016

Granted

Shares lost based on actual performance

Vested

Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2017
(1) Represents weighted-average grant date fair value for the 2016 and 2017 tranches.
(2) Represents weighted-average grant date fair value for the 2017 tranche.

Market Condition Performance Share Units

Number of
PCSUs

Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share

159

$
244
(22) $
— $
(26) $
$
355

166
$
(45) $
— $
(22) $
$
454

51.23
47.98 (1)
36.43

—

41.49

42.14
53.56 (2)
53.56

—

40.78

40.87

MCPSUs are awarded to key employees annually and cliff vest at the end of three years, subject to continued service

and the attainment of performance conditions. The MCPSU award represents the contingent right to receive a number of
shares equal to a portion, all or a multiple (not to exceed 200%) of the target number of MCPSUs. The MCPSUs are divided
into three tranches and each tranche is earned based on the achievement of a total shareholder return ("TSR") target relative
to the TSR of an applicable peer group over the 1-, 2- and 3-year cumulative periods in the vesting period. The weighted-
average grant date fair value of the MCPSUs is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Assumptions used in the
2017, 2016 and 2015 models included a 25.0% expected volatility rate and a 1.1% risk-free interest rate. The expected
volatility rate is based on the historical volatility over the most recent period equal to the vesting period. Given Veritiv’s
limited trading history, an average of the peer group volatility was used for the portion of the historical period prior to the
Merger and Veritiv’s actual historical volatility was used for the portion of the period after the Merger. The risk-free interest
rate is based on the yield on U.S. Treasury securities matching the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognized
ratably from the grant date to the vesting date.

A summary of activity related to non-vested MCPSUs is presented below:

(units in thousands)

Non-vested at December 31, 2015

Granted

Shares earned based on actual performance

Vested

Forfeited/cancelled

Non-vested at December 31, 2016

Granted

Shares lost based on actual performance

Vested

Forfeited/cancelled

Non-vested at December 31, 2017

Number of
MCPSUs

Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share

146

— $
(44) $
$
208

$
100
(103) $
— $
(12) $
$
193

62.52

42.23

—

58.16

48.23

71.63

—

55.65
56.23

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized $15.7 million, $8.3 million and

$3.8 million, respectively, in expense related to the aforementioned equity-based awards. The income tax benefit recognized
in 2017, 2016 and 2015 related to stock-based compensation expense was $5.7 million, $3.2 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2017, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense was $21.8 million and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. Unrecognized compensation expense for the 2018
and 2019 tranches of the PCSU awards is estimated based on the Company's closing stock price at December 31, 2017.
Dividends are not paid or accrued on unvested stock units. The grant date fair values are not reduced for dividends as none
are expected to be paid during the vesting period.

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims and regulatory and administrative

Although the ultimate outcome of any legal proceeding or investigation cannot be predicted with certainty, based on
present information, including the Company's assessment of the merits of the particular claim, the Company does not expect
that any asserted or unasserted legal claims or proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse
effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Escheat Audit

In 2013, Unisource was notified by the State of Delaware that it intended to examine the books and records of

Unisource to determine compliance with Delaware escheat laws. Since that date, seven other states have joined with
Delaware in the audit process, which is conducted by an outside firm on behalf of the states. In the third quarter of 2017, the
Company recorded an estimated liability with respect to certain transactions in connection with the pending audit.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company filed an election to convert the Delaware portion of the audit into a

review under the State of Delaware’s Voluntary Disclosure Agreement Program (“VDA”). Under the VDA, the Company
will continue to identify source documents that support the historical treatment of the transactions at issue to determine the
amount it believes is owed to Delaware. Similarly, the Company will continue to identify source documents that support the
historical treatment of the transactions under audit by the other participating states.

Based upon the information available to date, the Company recognized an estimated liability in 2017 of $7.5

million. The Company anticipates that it may take more than a year to complete the VDA and audit. Due to the inherent
uncertainties with respect to the ultimate outcome of these matters, any updates to this estimate of loss could have a material
impact on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

17. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following is a brief description of the four reportable segments, organized by major product category:

• Packaging – The Packaging segment provides standard as well as custom and comprehensive packaging solutions

• Print – The Print segment sells and distributes commercial printing, writing, copying, digital, wide format and

• Publishing – The Publishing segment sells and distributes coated and uncoated commercial printing papers to

The Company’s consolidated financial results also include a "Corporate & Other" category which includes certain

assets and costs not primarily attributable to any of the reportable segments. Corporate & Other also includes the Veritiv
logistics solutions business which provides transportation and warehousing solutions.

The following tables present net sales, Adjusted EBITDA (the metric management uses to assess operating
performance) and certain other measures for each of the reportable segments and Corporate & Other for the periods
presented:

(in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
Net sales
Adjusted EBITDA
Depreciation and
amortization
Restructuring charges, net
Year Ended December 31,
2016
Net sales
Adjusted EBITDA
Depreciation and
amortization
Restructuring charges, net
Year Ended December 31,
2015
Net sales
Adjusted EBITDA
Depreciation and
amortization
Restructuring charges

Packaging

Facility
Solutions

Publishing

Total
Reportable
Segments

Corporate
& Other

Total

3,157.8
238.0

1,309.7
35.5

2,793.7
60.8

958.0
26.4

8,219.2
360.7

145.5
(184.3)

8,364.7

15.9
6.1

6.0
2.3

10.4
8.0

1.5
0.0

33.8
16.4

20.4
0.3

54.2
16.7

2,854.2
221.2

1,271.6
47.0

3,047.4
76.8

1,033.6
23.6

12.4
4.6

5.9
2.3

12.4
5.2

3.1
0.1

2,829.9
212.6

1,289.3
41.7

3,271.8
79.0

1,215.5
34.7

14.4
3.8

7.1
2.5

13.5
3.6

3.1
0.0

8,206.8
368.6

33.8
12.2

8,606.5
368.0

38.1
9.9

119.8
(176.4)

20.9
0.2

111.2
(186.0)

18.8
1.4

8,326.6

54.7
12.4

8,717.7

56.9
11.3

The table below presents a reconciliation of income (loss) from operations before income taxes as reflected in the

Consolidated Statements of Operations to Adjusted EBITDA for the reportable segments:

(in millions)
Income (loss) before income taxes
Interest expense, net
Depreciation and amortization
Restructuring charges, net
Stock-based compensation
LIFO reserve increase (decrease)
Non-restructuring asset impairment charges
Non-restructuring severance charges
Non-restructuring pension charges
Acquisition and integration expenses
Fair value adjustment on Tax Receivable Agreement contingent liability
Fair value adjustment on contingent consideration liability
Escheat audit contingent liability
Other
Adjustment for Corporate & Other
Adjusted EBITDA for reportable segments

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2015

2017

(1.9) $
31.2
54.2
16.7
15.7
7.1
8.4
3.5
2.2
36.5
(9.4)
2.0
7.5
2.7
184.3
360.7

40.8
27.5
54.7
12.4
8.3
3.6
7.7
3.1
2.4
25.9
4.9
—
—
0.9
176.4
368.6

44.9
27.0
56.9
11.3
3.8
(7.3)
2.6
3.3
—
34.9
1.9
—
—
2.7
186.0
368.0

The table below summarizes total assets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

(in millions)
Packaging
Facility Solutions
Print
Publishing
Corporate & Other
Total assets

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

1,192.2
416.9
801.8
168.6
128.9
2,708.4

875.9
397.9
874.1
170.0
165.8
2,483.7

The following table presents net sales and property and equipment, net by geographic area.

(in millions)

U.S.

Canada

Rest of world

Total

Net Sales

Property and Equipment, Net

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

7,510.9

7,552.3

7,961.3

300.6

682.0

171.8

631.2

143.1

628.9

127.5

36.7

2.9

8,364.7

8,326.6

8,717.7

340.2

333.8

35.0

3.0

371.8

No single customer accounted for more than 5% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 38% of our purchases were made from ten suppliers.

18. QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)

The unaudited quarterly results of operations for 2017 and 2016 are summarized below:

2017

Three Months Ended

(in millions, except per share data)

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

Net sales

Cost of products sold

Net income (loss)

1,994.6

2,028.9

2,116.8

1,629.3

(2.2)

1,660.5
(9.1)

1,736.6
(14.3)

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding

– basic

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding

– diluted

15.69

15.70

Earnings (loss) per share (1):

Basic earnings (loss) per share

(0.14) $

(0.58) $

(0.91) $

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

(0.14)

(0.58)

(0.91)

2,224.4

1,820.2

12.3

15.70

15.98

0.78

0.77

(1) See Note 13, Earning (Loss) Per Share, for discussion about the shares of common stock utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share for the year ended December 31, 2017.

2016

Three Months Ended

(in millions, except per share data)

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

Net sales

Cost of products sold

Net income

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding

– basic

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding

– diluted

Earnings per share (1):

Basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share

2,019.8

2,060.8

2,126.6

1,654.5

3.3

16.00

1,687.9

7.9

16.00

1,743.8

5.6

16.00

16.27

0.21

0.49

0.35

0.34

2,119.4

1,740.2

4.2

15.87

16.21

0.26

(1) See Note 13, Earnings (Loss) Per Share, for discussion about the shares of common stock utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share for the year ended December 31, 2016.

See the table below for the quarterly breakdown of acquisition and integration expenses and restructuring charges,

2017
Three Months Ended
June 30

6.4
4.1

7.5
23.2

September 30
14.2
$
2.7

2016
Three Months Ended
June 30

6.2
1.7

6.1
(0.3)

September 30
7.3
$
5.8

December 31
8.4
$
(13.3)

December 31
6.3
$
5.2

net:

(in millions)

Acquisition and integration expenses
Restructuring charges, net

(in millions)

Acquisition and integration expenses
Restructuring charges, net

March 31

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of

the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized or
reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. The Company’s management, with the participation of the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures as of December 31, 2017. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.

Management necessarily applies its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures,
which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management's control objectives. The Company's
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure
controls and procedures can prevent all possible errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Judgments in decision-making can
be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of one or more persons. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and while our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to be effective under
circumstances where they should reasonably be expected to operate effectively, there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in any control
system, misstatements due to possible errors or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2017 that

have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The management of Veritiv Corporation is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the Consolidated Financial

Statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S.
GAAP appropriate in the circumstances and, accordingly, include certain amounts based on our best judgments and estimates.
Financial information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is consistent with that in the financial statements.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of our company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial

reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by a program
of internal audits and appropriate reviews by management, written policies and guidelines, careful selection and training of
qualified personnel and a written code of conduct adopted by our Board of Directors that is applicable to all officers and
employees of our Company and subsidiaries, as well as a code of conduct that is applicable to all of our directors.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and
even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation

and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our

internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. The scope of management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting includes all of the Company’s businesses except for the various All
American Containers entities (collectively, “AAC”) which were acquired on August 31, 2017. The financial statements of
AAC constitute 6.8% of total assets and 0.9% of revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2017. Further discussion of this acquisition can be found in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. This exclusion is in accordance with SEC staff interpretive guidance that a recently acquired business
may be omitted from the scope of the assessment in the year of acquisition. In making this assessment on the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework
(2013 Framework). Based on our assessment, management has concluded that internal controls over financial reporting were
effective as of December 31, 2017.

Our independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, are appointed by

the Audit and Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. Deloitte & Touche LLP has audited and reported on the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Veritiv Corporation, and has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. The report of the independent registered public accounting firm is contained in this
Annual Report.

Audit and Finance Committee Responsibility

The Audit and Finance Committee of our Board of Directors, composed solely of directors who are independent in
accordance with the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards, the Exchange Act and our Corporate
Governance Guidelines, meets with the independent auditors, management and internal auditors periodically to discuss
internal control over financial reporting and auditing and financial reporting matters. The Audit and Finance Committee
reviews with the independent auditors the scope and results of the audit effort. The Audit and Finance Committee also meets
periodically with the independent auditors and the chief internal auditor without management present to ensure that the
independent auditors and the chief internal auditor have free access to the Audit and Finance Committee. Our Audit and
Finance Committee’s Report can be found in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April
25, 2018, which will be filed on or about March 2, 2018.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Veritiv Corporation

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Veritiv Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established
in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our
report dated March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its
assessment the internal control over financial reporting at the All American Containers entities (collectively referred to as
"AAC"), which were acquired on August 31, 2017 and whose financial statements constitute 6.8% of total assets and 0.9% of

revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accordingly, our
audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at AAC.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and
are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in
all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the
risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 1, 2018

100

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

101

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

(a) Directors of the Company.

This information is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be filed subsequent to the filing of this report under the heading "Proposal 1 – Election of Directors."

(b) Executive Officers of the Company.

This information can be found under "Executive Officers of the Company" in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

(d) Identification and Composition of the Audit and Finance Committee.

(e) Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

(f) Code of Ethics.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

This information is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of

Shareholders to be filed subsequent to the filing of this report under the headings "Executive Compensation" and "Corporate
Governance—Director Compensation."

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

This information is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of

Shareholders to be filed subsequent to the filing of this report under the headings "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management" and "Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plans."

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

102

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following documents are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K:

1. Financial Statements:

See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

2. Financial Statement Schedules:

All schedules have been omitted as the required information is included in the footnotes or not applicable.

Exhibit
No.
2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

3.1

3.2

3.3

10.1

Description
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 28, 2014, by and among International Paper
Company, Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a/ xpedx Holding Company), xpedx Intermediate, LLC, xpedx, LLC,
UWW Holdings, LLC, UWW Holdings, Inc. and Unisource Worldwide, Inc., incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193950) filed on
April 4, 2014.

Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 28, 2014, by and among
International Paper Company, Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a xpedx Holding Company), xpedx Intermediate,
LLC, xpedx, LLC, UWW Holdings, LLC, UWW Holdings, Inc. and Unisource Worldwide, Inc.,
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-193950) filed on June 5, 2014.

Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 4, 2014, by and among
International Paper Company, Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a) xpedx Holding Company), xpedx Intermediate,
LLC, xpedx, LLC, UWW Holdings, LLC, UWW Holdings, Inc. and Unisource Worldwide, Inc.,
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-193950) filed on June 5, 2014.

Contribution and Distribution Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2014, by and among International
Paper Company, Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a/ xpedx Holding Company), UWW Holdings, Inc. and UWW
Holdings, LLC, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-193950) filed on April 4, 2014.

Amendment No. 1 to the Contribution and Distribution Agreement, dated May 28, 2014, by and among
International Paper Company, Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a xpedx Holding Company), UWW Holdings, Inc.
and UWW Holdings, LLC, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.5 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193950) filed on June 5, 2014.

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Veritiv Corporation, incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2014.

Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Veritiv Corporation,
incorporate by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May
13, 2016.

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veritiv Corporation, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2014

Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, among Veritiv Corporation, xpedx Intermediate, LLC and
xpedx, LLC, as borrowers, the several lenders and financial institutions from time to time parties thereto,
Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders party thereto, and the
other parties thereto, together with the ABL Joinder Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, made by
Unisource Worldwide, Inc. and Unisource Canada, Inc. for the benefit of the Lenders under the Credit
Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 3, 2014.

103

Exhibit
No.
10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8†

10.9†

Description
First Amendment to ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2016, among Veritiv Operating
Company (f/k/a Unisource Worldwide, Inc.) and Unisource Canada, Inc., as borrowers, Veritiv
Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Veritiv Operating Company, as loan parties, the several lenders
and financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent and collateral agent for the lenders party thereto, and the other parties thereto, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 15, 2016.

U.S. Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, made by xpedx Intermediate, LLC,
xpedx, LLC, the Subsidiary Borrowers and the U.S. Guarantors parties thereto and Veritiv Corporation,
in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent for the Secured Parties (as
defined therein), together with the Assumption and Supplemental Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014,
made by Veritiv Corporation, Alco Realty, Inc., Graph Comm Holdings International, Inc., Graphic
Communications Holdings, Inc., Paper Corporation of North America, Unisource International Holdings,
Inc., Unisource International Holdings Poland, Inc., and Unisource Worldwide, Inc., in favor of Bank of
America, N.A., as collateral agent and as administrative agent, incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2014.

Canadian Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, made by Unisource Canada, Inc.
and the Canadian Guarantors parties thereto, in favour of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and collateral agent for the Secured Parties (as defined therein), incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2014.

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, between UWW Holdings, LLC and Veritiv
Corporation, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 3, 2014.

Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, by and among Veritiv Corporation and UWW
Holdings, LLC, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K filed on July 3, 2014.

Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2014, by and among International Paper Company,
Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a/ xpedx Holding Company) and UWW Holdings, Inc., incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-193950) filed on February 14, 2014.

Employment Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2017, between Veritiv Corporation and Mary A.
Laschinger, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 5, 2018.

Offer Letter, dated as of February 13, 2014, between Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a xpedx Holding Company)
and Stephen J. Smith, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed
on August 14, 2014.

10.10†*

Offer Letter, dated as of September 16, 2016, between Veritiv Operating Company and Tracy L. Pearson.

10.11†*

Addendum to Offer Letter, dated November 15, 2016, between Veritiv Operating Company and Tracy L.
Pearson.

10.12†

10.13†

10.14†

10.15†

10.16†

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Veritiv Corporation (f/k/a xpedx Holding Company) and
each of its directors, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193950) filed on June 11, 2014.

Veritiv Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, effective March 8, 2017,
incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
filed on April 13, 2017.

2014 Short-Year Veritiv Incentive Plan adopted effective as of August 8, 2014, incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2014.

Form of Notice of 2014 Long-Term Transition Incentive Award, incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.16 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2014.

Form of Notice of 2014-15 Long-Term Transition Incentive Award, incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2014.

104

Exhibit
No.
10.17†

10.18†

10.19†

10.20†

10.21†

10.22†

10.23†

10.24†

10.25†

10.26†

21.1*

23.1*

31.1*

31.2*

32.1*

32.2*

Description
Form of Notice of 2014-15-16 Long-Term Transition Incentive Award, incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2014.

Terms and Conditions of Long-Term Transition Incentive Award Opportunities, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2014.

Veritiv Corporation Deferred Compensation Savings Plan, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.20
to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2014.

Form of Director Deferred Share Unit Award Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.21
to the Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2015.

Form of Director Deferred Share Unit Award Agreement (Stock-Settled Award), incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2016.

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.22 to the
Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2015.

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (Adjusted EBITDA Performance Shares), incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2015.

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (Relative TSR Performance Shares), incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2015.

2015 Veritiv Corporation Annual Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, effective March 8, 2017
incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
filed on April 13, 2017.

Veritiv Corporation Executive Severance Plan adopted effective as of March 4, 2015, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2015.

List of Subsidiaries.

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

101.INS* XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.CAL
*
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.LAB
*
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

† Management contract or compensatory plans or arrangements

* Filed herewith

105

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

106

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 1, 2018.

SIGNATURES

VERITIV CORPORATION

(Registrant)

By:

/s/ Mary A. Laschinger

Name: Mary A. Laschinger

Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 1, 2018.

(i)

Principal executive officer:

/s/ Mary A. Laschinger

Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

Mary A. Laschinger

(ii)

Principal financial officer:

/s/ Stephen J. Smith

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Stephen J. Smith

(iii) Principal accounting officer:

/s/ W. Forrest Bell

Chief Accounting Officer

W. Forrest Bell

(iv) Directors:

/s/ David E. Flitman

Director

David E. Flitman

/s/ Daniel T. Henry

Daniel T. Henry

Director

/s/ Liza K. Landsman

Director

Liza K. Landsman

/s/ Tracy A. Leinbach

Director

Tracy A. Leinbach

/s/ William E. Mitchell

Director

William E. Mitchell

/s/ Michael P. Muldowney

Director

Michael P. Muldowney

/s/ Charles G. Ward, III

Director

Charles G. Ward, III

/s/ John J. Zillmer

John J. Zillmer

Director

107

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

TRANSFER AGENT
& REGISTRAR

INVESTOR
CONTACT

Computershare
P.O. Box 505000
Louisville, KY 40233
computershare.com/investor
866.276.9370

Thomas C. Morabito
Director, Investor Relations

investor@veritivcorp.com
844.845.2136

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
FOR 2017

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, GA

ANNUAL REPORT &
FORM 10-K COPIES

Copies of the Annual Report
and Form 10-K are available
and may be obtained by
contacting:

ANNUAL MEETING

The Veritiv Corporation
Annual Meeting will be held
on Wednesday, April 25, 2018
in Atlanta, GA.

Veritiv Corporation
c/o Investor Relations
1000 Abernathy Rd. NE
Building 400, Suite 1700
Atlanta, GA 30328

844.845.2136
ir.veritivcorp.com

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this report regarding
the Company’s future operating results, performance,
business plans, prospects, guidance and any other
statements not constituting historical fact are “forward-
looking statements” subject to the safe harbor created
by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All
forward-looking statements reflect only the Company’s
current beliefs and assumptions with respect to future
operating results, performance, business plans, prospects,
guidance and other matters, and are based on information
currently available to the Company. Accordingly, the
statements are subject to significant risks, uncertainties
and contingencies, which could cause the Company’s
actual operating results, performance or business plans
or prospects to differ materially from those expressed in,
or implied by, these statements. For a detailed discussion
of specific risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ from those contained in the forward-
looking statements, see the information under the heading
“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2017, which is included in this
report, and in other filings we make with the SEC. The
Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise the
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by law. In addition, historical information should not be
considered as an indicator of future performance.

819593cov.indd 3

3/6/18 1:20 PM

1000 Abernathy Rd. NE

Building 400, Suite 1700

Atlanta, GA 30328

veritivcorp.com

LinkedIn.com/company/ Veritiv

Facebook.com/ VeritivCorp

Twitter.com/ Veritiv

Twitter.com/ VeritivIR

Printed on Endurance® 100 lb. Silk Cover & 80 lb. Text.

819593cov.indd 4

3/6/18 1:20 PM