This document is printed using soy-based inks using FSC and Green
Seal™ certified paper that contains recycled post-consumer fiber.
Revenues were up 26% to $534 million in 2015,
compared to $424 million in 2014. The increases were
primarily due to the addition of our Aviation Group and
growth of our Supply Chain Management Group. For the
full year these increases were partially offset by revenue
declines in our Federal Services and IT, Energy and
Management Groups.
Operating income was up 37% to $50.5 million in 2015,
compared to $36.9 million in 2014. The increases in
operating income were primarily attributable to the
increases in our revenues, and to a more profitable mix
of revenues resulting from our diversification of products
and services. Net income was up 28% to $24.9 million
for the full year of 2015, or $4.62 per diluted share,
compared to $19.4 million, or $3.61 per diluted share
for the full year of 2014.
�
Bookings and funded contract backlog in our Federal
Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting
groups were $281 million for the twelve months of
2015, compared to revenue of $217 million for the
same period. Funded contract backlog at December 31,
2015, was $238 million, compared to $214 million at
September 30, 2015, and $193 million at December
31, 2014. We have seen an increase in new contract
awards, including funding totaling approximately $193
million during the second half of 2015.
Operational and Contract
Highlights in 2015
� On January 28, 2015, we closed on our acquisition
of VSE Aviation, Inc. Our Aviation Group has
provided a significant contribution to our 2015
results, including $119.7 million in revenue and
$10.6 million in operating income.
� Revenues from our Supply Chain Management
�
Group increased by 14% for the twelve months of
2015, following an increase in 2014 of 11%. This
increase included growth in supply chain support
provided to USPS and commercial truck fleets.
VS2, LLC, our joint venture between VSE and CB&I
Federal Services, was awarded a Logistics Support
Services task order under the U.S. Army’s Enhanced
Army Global Logistics Enterprise (EAGLE) Program
to support base operations and logistics at Fort
Benning, Georgia. This task order has a base year,
four one-year options, and one six-month option.
The total potential value of the task order is $263
million, and VSE’s potential value is approximately
$110 million, if all option periods are exercised.
Work under this task order commenced in August
2015.
� On December 31, 2015, we acquired Ultra Seating
Company located in Grand Prairie, TX, for a
2015 Highlights
purchase price of approximately $3.8 million. Ultra
Seating provides specialized seating for heavy duty
and light duty commercial trucks. Ultra Seating
will be included in our Supply Chain Management
Group and complements our Wheeler Bros., Inc.
subsidiary by expanding our supply chain markets
and establishing a key new geographic distribution
channel to better serve mission critical vehicle
fleets.
The book to bill ratio of our Federal Services and IT,
Energy and Management Consulting groups was 1.3
for the twelve months of 2015. The book to bill is a
ratio of the bookings of $281 million divided by the
revenues of $217 million for these two groups. The
following is a summary of 2015 awards:
� Our Federal Services Group was awarded
several task orders in 2015 to provide In-Country
Technical Assist Team (ICTAT) and Continental
United States (CONUS) Project Management
support under our Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
Naval Ship Transfer and Repair (N*STAR)
contract through the Naval Sea Systems
Command (NAVSEA) International Fleet Support
Program. The combined value of the task orders
is approximately $97.5 million.
� In September, our Federal Services Group was
awarded a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) task order
under its SeaPort-e contract vehicle to provide
technical, maintenance and test support to
the U.S. Marine Corps Systems Command in
Quantico, VA. This task order has a period of
performance that includes a six-month base
period and four one-year options with a total
value of approximately $37 million. This award
represents an increase in contract value, scope,
and capabilities to work currently performed by
VSE.
� Our Federal Services Group was also awarded a
contract in December 2015, to remanufacture
up to 175 M915A3 trucks provided by Red River
Army Depot (RRAD). The firm-fixed-price award
has a period of performance of 12 months and
total award of up to $23 million.
� In May, our Akimeka subsidiary was awarded
a task order under the Chief Information
Officer - Solutions and Partners 3 (CIO-SP3)
Government-Wide Acquisition Contract (GWAC)
for core development and sustainment for the
Joint Medical Asset Repository (JMAR) system.
This Firm Fixed Price (FFP) task order has an
11-month base period of performance, plus
three one-year option periods, and a total
contract value of approximately $14.9 million, if
all options are exercised.
1
INTEGRITY • AGILITY • VALUE � In October, our Energetics subsidiary was
awarded a Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA)
from U-T Battelle, LLC for support to the U.S.
Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National
Laboratory (ORNL). This BOA is a five year award
with a ceiling of $10 million.
� In September, our Energetics subsidiary was
awarded two subcontracts through the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA) Technical,
Engineering & Programmatic Support Services
Blanket Purchase Agreement. The two task
order awards consist of technical and program
management support for DOE Office of
International Affairs and for the DOE Office of
Energy Policy and Systems Analysis. The task
orders have a three-year period of performance
and a total combined estimated value to
Energetics of approximately $7 million.
� In November, our Akimeka subsidiary was
awarded a subcontract by the successful
incumbent on the recompete of its contract to
operate and maintain the government-owned,
contractor-operated Global Service Center
for the Defense Health Agency (DHA), Health
Information Technology Directorate. The contract
has a base period of one year plus four one-
year options, and a total value for Akimeka of
approximately $6.3 million.
� Our Federal Services Group was selected as
one of 20 prime contractors for the U.S. Army
Tank-Automotive and Armament Command’s
(TACOM) Strategic Services Solutions (TS3)
Equipment Related Services (ERS) contract.
The Federal Services Group will compete with
other prime contractors for task order awards
under this indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity
(IDIQ) contract, which has a combined maximum
ceiling value of $1.1 billion and an eight
year period of performance if all options are
exercised.
� VSE’s Federal Services Group also was named
one of 19 prime contractors on the TACOM TS3
Research and Development (R&D) IDIQ contract,
which has a combined maximum ceiling value
of $634 million and an eight year period of
performance if all options are exercised.
Corporate Profile
We are a diversified company with business operations
in more than 100 locations world-wide. VSE’s offerings
include:
�
Fleet Sustainment Services
� Supply Chain Management—We provide parts
sourcing, acquisition, inventory, scheduling,
transportation, shipping, logistics, data
management, and other products and services
to assist our clients with vehicle, ship, aircraft
and equipment supply chain management
efforts.
�
� Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul (MRO) and
Engineering—We provide MRO services for
vehicles, ships and aircraft, including reverse
engineering and technical support for equipment
and vehicles, and ship maintenance, overhaul
and follow-on technical support. We also provide
refurbishment, corrosion abatement, and fleet
sustainment services.
IT, Energy and Management Consulting
� IT Services—We provide complete enterprise
architecture, data mining, public protection/
security, and technical/software engineering
for systems, assessments and reviews in
medical logistics, e-health, cyber-security,
information assurance and product and process
improvement.
� Technical and Management Consulting—We
provide professional competencies in technical,
policy, business, and management support
in areas of energy modernization, clean and
efficient energy, climate change mitigation,
infrastructure protection, and measurement
technology.
Stockholder Inquiries
VSE is a publicly owned company and its shares are
traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under
the symbol VSEC. Inquiries about stock ownership,
dividends, and stockholder changes of address may
be directed to our Transfer Agent: Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust, 17 Battery Place, 8th Floor, New York,
NY 10004, or to VSE at 6348 Walker Lane, Alexandria,
VA 22310, Attention: Corporate Secretary, Telephone
(703) 329-4721.
Further information about VSE and its subsidiaries is
available at www.vsecorp.com, www.akimeka.com,
www.energetics.com, www.wheelerfleet.com,
www.ctaerospace.com, www.primeturbines.com,
www.kansasaviation.com, and www.apscomiami.com.
2
2015 VSE Annual Report and Form 10-K Financial Highlights
Revenues
($M)
974.2
974.2
937.4
937.4
811
811
603.2
603.2
364
364
580.8
580.8
546.8
546.8
534534
471.6
471.6
424.1
424.1
Net Income
($M)
19
19
14.1
14.1
7.8
7.8
24.924.9
24
24
23.7
23.7
22.9
22.9
21.3
21.3
20.6
20.6
19.4
19.4
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
Y E A R
‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
Y E A R
‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15
Funded
Backlog ($M)
523
523
461
461
400
400
375
375
299
299
Number of
Employees
2897
2897
2534
2534
2516 2472
2516 2472
282
282
250
250
234234
238238
193
193
1920
1920
1223
1223
857
857
2057
2057
1872
1872
1589
1589
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
Y E A R
‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
Y E A R
‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15
Earnings Per
Share
Diluted ($)
4.67
4.67
4.53
4.53
3.74
3.74
2.82
2.82
1.61
1.61
4.624.62
4.28
4.28
4.01
4.01
3.9
3.9
3.61
3.61
Stockholders’
Equity ($M)
229.3
229.3
205.5
205.5
186.8
186.8
164.3
164.3
143.6
143.6
123.8
123.8
101.3
101.3
76.1
76.1
56.4
56.4
38.2
38.2
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
Y E A R
‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15
Y E A R
3
INTEGRITY • AGILITY • VALUE 0.430.43
0.39
0.39
0.35
0.35
0.31
0.31
0.27
0.27
Dividends
Per Share ($)
0.23
0.23
0.195
0.195
0.175
0.175
0.155
0.155
0.135
0.135
65.90
65.90
62.1862.18
48.01
48.01
Stock Price,
End of Year ($)
48.84
48.84
45.08
45.08
39.23
39.23
33.02
33.02
24.28 24.51
24.28 24.51
16.95
16.95
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
Y E A R
‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15
‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11
Y E A R
‘12 ‘13 ‘14
‘15
Income Statement Data (in thousands, except share data)
Year Ended December 31
2015
% CHANGE
2014
Revenues
$
533,982
Net income
Earnings per share (diluted)
24,918
4.62
26%
29%
28%
Weighted average shares (diluted)
5,393,635
$
424,071
19,365
3.61
5,371,200
Balance sheet data (in thousands, except percentages)
December 31
2015
% CHANGE
2014
Total assets
$
622,134
Working capital
Stockholders’ equity
Return on equity
104,393
229,309
12.1%
75%
199%
12%
$
355,330
34,871
205,489
10.4%
4
2015 VSE Annual Report and Form 10-K Message to Stockholders
Overview
In 2015 we made significant progress implementing
our diversification strategy. This progress, coupled with
revenue and operating income growth in our legacy
Federal Government markets during the second half of
the year, provides a solid base for VSE entering 2016.
The strong performance from our supply chain offerings,
led by Wheeler Bros., Inc. (“WBI”), and the addition of
our aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO),
parts supply and distribution businesses, represented
by VSE Aviation, Inc. (“VAI”), are the primary drivers of
our growth in 2015.
Our Supply Chain Management Group grew in both
new and existing markets. In 2015 our vehicle parts
supply and inventory management support for the USPS
delivery vehicle fleet continued to produce successful
results. We are focused on marketing our Managed
Inventory Program (MIP) to new customers, including
commercial fleet owners. In December 2015, WBI
acquired Ultra Seating Company, a small Texas based
company that manufactures specialized seating for
heavy duty and light duty commercial trucks. This
acquisition expands our addressable markets and
enables us to better service our existing clients.
In January 2015, we acquired four aviation businesses
and formed VSE Aviation, Inc., which provides MRO
services and parts supply for general aviation engines
and engine accessories. We have successfully
integrated our aviation acquisition, which has
contributed to our operating results in 2015. VAI has
provided us with a wide range of new clients, resulting
in a more diversified revenue mix from both commercial
and Federal clients. We are extending these new
offerings to our traditional U.S. and international military
customer base.
Our Federal Services Group has seen an increase in
contract awards, including an award for which work
commenced in August 2015, to provide logistics support
services to the Fort Benning Logistics Readiness
Center. Also, in December 2015, authorization by the
Government to transfer two frigates to Taiwan under our
Foreign Military Sales program was finalized, which is
expected to provide new work for our Federal Services
Group later in 2016.
USPS Vehicle Fleet
The USPS is a key client for which our mission critical
supply chain support will continue to be essential in
sustaining USPS’ aging fleet as this client embarks on a
lengthy transition to a new replacement fleet. Our years
of service and knowledge of this client’s needs has led
to our participation on multiple industry teams in the
prospective competition to provide the next generation
USPS delivery vehicles. Independent of the results
or timing of that procurement activity, we anticipate
servicing the eventual replacement fleet in the same
manner that we service the existing fleet.
Looking Ahead
We have been successful with our “pivot” strategy as
we sell our supply chain management services and
product offerings to new markets, including domestic
commercial entities. Our traditional core competencies
of platform and system sustainment and service life
extension for the Government and commercial markets
are key pieces of our business model that we will
continue to expand. We believe the improved bookings
and positive financial results during the second half of
2015 in our Federal Services Group, strong contribution
from WBI, and the addition of our aviation business are
positive indicators for VSE’s future growth.
Maurice A Gauthier
CEO/President/COO
March 2016
Clifford M. Kendall
Chairman of the Board
March 2016
5
INTEGRITY • AGILITY • VALUE Board of Directors
Clifford M. Kendall
Chairman of the Board
VSE Corporation
Maurice A. “Mo” Gauthier
CEO/President/COO
VSE Corporation
Ralph E. Eberhart
General, USAF (Ret.)
President, Armed Forces Benefit Association
Chairman and Director of
5Star Life Insurance and Triumph Group, Inc.
John C. Harvey, Jr.
Admiral, USN (Ret.)
Secretary of Veterans and Defense Affairs,
State of Virginia, Former Commander, U.S. Fleet
Forces Command
Calvin S. Koonce, Ph.D.
Chairman, Koonce Securities, Inc.
Securities Broker/Dealer
James F. Lafond, CPA
Retired Executive; formerly
Washington Area Managing Partner,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
John E. “Jack” Potter
President/CEO, Metropolitan Washington Airports
Authority, Former Postmaster General and CEO of the
USPS
Jack C. Stultz, Jr.
Lieutenant General, USAR (Ret.)
Operations Manager, Procter & Gamble Company (Ret.)
Bonnie K. Wachtel
Vice President and General Counsel,
Wachtel & Co., Inc.
VSE Board of Directors (left to right): Jim Lafond, Gen. Ralph Eberhart, Adm. John Harvey, Bonnie Wachtel, Cliff
Kendall (Chairman), Mo Gauthier (CEO), Calvin Koonce, Gen. Jack Stultz, and Jack Potter.
6
2015 VSE Annual Report and Form 10-K About VSE
VSE Corporation was established in 1959 with a mission to provide engineering and technical support services to reduce the
cost and improve the reliability of DoD systems and equipment. Originally incorporated as Value Engineering Company, VSE
has evolved to serve our customers’ asset, systems improvement, service life extension, and sustainment needs. VSE conducts
business operations through the parent company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including Wheeler Bros., Inc., VSE Aviation,
Inc. (which includes Prime Turbines, CT Aerospace, Kansas Aviation and Air Parts & Supply Co.), Akimeka LLC and Energetics
Incorporated.
Today, VSE is a broadly diversified company focused on creating, sustaining, and improving the systems, equipment, and
processes of our federal and commercial customers through core competencies in fleet sustainment, supply chain management,
maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO), legacy systems sustainment, obsolescence management, prototyping, reverse
engineering, technology insertion, foreign military sales, management consulting, information technology and process
improvement.
VSE’s strength lies in the talented professionals who support our customers in maintaining and modernizing products,
equipment, and systems. Our nationwide network of local offices provides access to a spectrum of corporate resources and
services in diversified engineering, logistics, management, and information technology disciplines. We combine their individual
skills, experience, and motivation with corporate resources, technology, teamwork, and the management principles of integrity,
honesty, and self-governance to deliver high quality, cost-effective solutions to a global customer base.
VSE is a publicly traded (NASDAQ: VSEC), ISO 9001:2008-registered supply chain management and professional services
company. VSE’s subsidiary, Wheeler Bros., Inc. has received seven U.S. Postal Service Supplier Performance Awards. VSE has
been ranked among the top 100 defense contractors, top 10 foreign military sales contractors, and top 50 Navy contractors in
the nation.
NASDAQ: VSEC
ISO 9001:2008
Celebrating
57
Years
of Excellence
Corporate Supporter: Yellow Ribbon Fund
7
INTEGRITY • AGILITY • VALUE Locations
VSE Corporation Headquarters
Barstow, California
Sterling Heights, Michigan
6348 Walker Lane
Alexandria, VA 22310
(703) 960-4600 or
Toll-free: (800) 455-4873
Subsidiary Headquarters
Wheeler Bros., Inc.
Somerset, Pennsylvania
VSE Aviation, Inc.
Carrollton, Texas
Akimeka, LLC
Maitland, Florida
Energetics Incorporated
Columbia, Maryland
Other United States Locations
Huntsville, Alabama
Wynne, Arkansas
North Little Rock, Arkansas
Texarkana, Arkansas
Mesa, Arizona
Twentynine Palms, California
Chula Vista, California
Camp Pendleton, California
Miramar, California
Fort Bragg, North Carolina
China Lake NAWS, California
Durham, North Carolina
Fort Hunter Liggett, California
Whitesboro, New York
Fort Collins, Colorado
Fort Sill, Oklahoma
Lakewood, Colorado
Butler, Pennsylvania
Washington, D.C.
Miami, Florida
N. Charleston, South Carolina
San Antonio, Texas
College Park, Georgia
El Paso, Texas
Albany, Georgia
Fort Sam Houston, Texas
Fort Benning, Georgia
Grand Prairie, Texas
Barrigada, Guam
Honolulu, Hawaii
Mililani, Hawaii
Kihei, Hawaii
Gatesville, Texas
Texarkana, Texas
Ogden, Utah
Rosslyn, Virginia
Independence, Kansas
Reston, Virginia
Hyannis, Massachusetts
Ladysmith, Virginia
Fort Detrick, Maryland
Falls Church, Virginia
Bethesda, Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland
Chesapeake, Virginia
Fort McCoy, Wisconsin
VSE Aviation Inc. provides maintenance, repair and overhaul and parts supply for corporate and regional
turboprop and turbojet engines and engine accessories.
8
2015 VSE Annual Report and Form 10-K UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 Commission File Number: 0-3676
VSE CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
54-0649263
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
6348 Walker Lane
Alexandria, Virginia
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
22310
(Zip Code)
www.vsecorp.com
(Webpage)
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (703) 960-4600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $.05 per share
Name of each exchange on which registered
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
[ ] No [x]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
[ ] No [x]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files).
Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [x] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [x]
The aggregate market value of outstanding voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2015, was
approximately $223 million based on the last reported sales price of the registrant’s common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market as of that date.
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2016: 5,384,332.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be held on May 3, 2016,
are incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this report.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Executive Officers of Registrant
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risks
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART I
ITEM 1
ITEM 1A
ITEM 1B
ITEM 2
ITEM 3
ITEM 4
ITEM 4(a)
PART II
ITEM 5
ITEM 6
ITEM 7
ITEM 7A
ITEM 8
ITEM 9
ITEM 9A
ITEM 9B
PART III
ITEM 10
ITEM 11
ITEM 12
ITEM 13
ITEM 14
PART IV
ITEM 15
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
Exhibits
3
Page
5
8
11
11
12
13
13
14
17
18
29
30
55
55
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
58
60-69
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) contains statements that, to the extent they are not recitations of
historical fact, constitute "forward looking statements" under federal securities laws. All such statements are intended
to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by applicable securities laws. For discussions identifying some
important factors that could cause actual VSE Corporation (“VSE,” the “Company,” “us,” “our,” or “we”) results to
differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements contained in this filing, see VSE's “Narrative
Description of Business” (Items 1, 1A, 2 and 3), and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis.” Readers are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the
date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should also carefully review the risk factors described
in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed by the Company subsequent to this Form 10-K and any Current Reports on
Form 8-K filed by the Company.
4
ITEM 1. Business
(a) General Background
We are a diversified services and supply company that assists our clients in sustaining, extending the service
life, and improving the performance of their transportation, equipment, and other assets and systems. We provide
logistics and distribution services for legacy systems and equipment and professional and technical services to the
United States Government (the "government"), including the United States Postal Service ("USPS"), the United States
Department of Defense ("DoD"), federal civilian agencies, and to commercial and other customers. Our largest
customers are the USPS and the DoD. Our operations include supply chain management solutions and parts supply
for vehicle fleets; maintenance, repair, and overhaul (“MRO”) services and parts supply for aviation clients; vehicle
and equipment maintenance and refurbishment; logistics; engineering; energy and environmental services; IT and
health care IT solutions; and consulting services.
VSE was incorporated in Delaware in 1959 and the parent company serves as a centralized managing and
consolidating entity for our operating groups, each of which consists of one or more wholly owned subsidiaries or
unincorporated divisions that perform our services. VSE’s operating groups include our Supply Chain Management
Group, Aviation Group, Federal Services Group, and IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group. The term "VSE"
or "Company" means VSE and its subsidiaries and divisions unless the context indicates operations of only VSE as
the parent company.
(b) Financial Information
Our operations are conducted within four reportable segments aligned with our operating groups: (1) Supply
Chain, which generated approximately 37% of our revenues in 2015; (2) Aviation, which generated approximately
23% of our revenues in 2015; (3) Federal Services, which generated approximately 31% of our revenues in 2015; and
(4) IT, Energy and Management Consulting, which generated approximately 9% of our revenues in 2015. Additional
financial information for our reportable segments appears in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this
Form 10-K.
(c) Description of Business
Services and Products
We apply a broad array of capabilities and resources to support our clients’ transportation assets, vehicle
fleets, aircraft, systems, equipment and processes. We are focused on creating value by sustaining the life and
improving the performance of our client assets through core offerings in supply chain management, MRO, equipment
refurbishment, logistics and engineering. We also provide IT solutions, health care IT, and consulting services.
Typical service offerings include supply chain and inventory management services; vehicle fleet sustainment
programs; vehicle fleet parts; maintenance, repair, and overhaul of aircraft engines and engine components; aircraft
engine parts supply and distribution; engineering support for military vehicles; military equipment refurbishment and
modification; ship maintenance, overhaul, and follow-on technical support; logistics management support; machinery
condition analysis; specification preparation for ship alterations; ship’s force crew training; life cycle support for ships;
ship communication systems; energy conservation, energy efficiency, sustainable energy supply, and electric power
grid modernization projects; technology road-mapping; IT enterprise architecture development, information
assurance/business continuity, security risk management, and network services; medical logistics; and medical
command and control. See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Information and Results of
Operations” for more information regarding our business.
5
Revenues and Contracts
Our revenues are derived from the delivery of products and from contract services performed for our clients.
We offer our products and professional and technical services through various ordering agreements and negotiated
and competitive contract arrangements.
Our Supply Chain Management Group revenues result from the sale of vehicle parts to the USPS and other
government and commercial clients. We recognize revenue from the sale of vehicle parts when the customer takes
ownership of the parts.
Our Aviation Group revenues result from the sale of aircraft parts and performance of MRO services for
private and commercial aircraft owners, other aviation MRO providers, and aviation original equipment
manufacturers. We recognize revenues upon the shipment or delivery of products to customers based on when title or
risk of loss transfers to the customer.
Our Federal Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group revenues result primarily from cost
plus fixed fee, cost plus award fee, time and materials, or fixed-price contracts with the government. Revenues result
from work performed on these contracts by our own employees, from work performed by our subcontractors, and
from costs of materials used in performing the work. Revenues on cost-type contracts are recorded as allowable costs
are incurred and fees are earned. Revenues for time and materials contracts are recorded on the basis of allowable
labor hours worked multiplied by the contract defined billing rates, plus the cost of materials used in performance on
the contract. Profits or losses on time and material contracts result from the difference between the cost of services
performed and the contract defined billing rates for these services. Revenue recognition methods on fixed-price
contracts vary depending on the nature of the work and the contract terms. Revenues on fixed-price service contracts
are recorded as work is performed, typically ratably over the service period. Revenues on fixed-price contracts that
require delivery of specific items are recorded based on a price per unit as units are delivered.
The USPS, U.S. Army, and U.S. Navy are our largest customers. Our customers also include various other
government and commercial entities.
Customer
U. S. Postal Service
U.S. Army
U.S. Navy
U.S. Air Force
Total - DoD
Commercial Aviation
Other Commercial
Total - Commercial
Revenues by Customer
(dollars in thousands)
Years ended December 31,
%
34.6
2014
$167,268
15.0
18.5
0.7
34.2
101,714
88,007
3,323
193,044
%
39.4
24.0
20.7
0.8
45.5
2013
$142,203
101,736
123,307
3,625
228,668
2015
$184,876
80,086
98,887
3,558
182,531
119,729
4,653
124,382
22.4
0.9
23.3
-
3,680
3,680
-
0.9
0.9
-
2,250
2,250
Department of Energy
Social Security Administration
Department of Treasury
Other Government
Total - Other Civilian Agencies
16,020
9,666
1,405
15,102
42,193
3.0
1.8
0.3
2.8
7.9
19,000
10,153
10,897
20,029
60,079
4.5
2.4
2.6
4.7
14.2
20,124
12,981
35,929
29,483
98,517
%
30.1
21.6
26.1
0.8
48.5
-
0.5
0.5
4.3
2.8
7.6
6.2
20.9
Total
$533,982
100.0
$424,071
100.0
$471,638
100.0
6
Backlog
Funded backlog represents a measure of potential future revenues from work performed by our Federal
Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting groups on government contracts. Funded backlog is defined by
us as the total value of contracts that has been appropriated and funded by the procuring agencies, less the amount of
revenues that have already been recognized on such contracts. Our reported backlog is comprised of funding received
by us in incremental amounts intended to fund work that is generally expected to be completed within six to 12 months
following the award of the funding. Accordingly, substantially our entire reported backlog is reasonably expected to
be filled within this time. Our funded backlog for our Federal Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting
groups as of December 31, 2015, was approximately $238 million. Funded backlog as of December 31, 2014 and
2013 was approximately $193 million and $234 million, respectively. Changes in funded backlog on contracts are
sometimes unpredictable due to uncertainties associated with changing government program priorities and availability
of funds, which is heavily dependent upon the congressional authorization and appropriation process. Delays in this
process, such as those experienced in recent years, may temporarily diminish the availability of funds for ongoing and
planned work.
In addition to the funded backlog levels, we have contract ceiling amounts available for use on multiple
award, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts with DoD and federal civilian agencies. While these contracts
increase the opportunities available for us to pursue future work, the actual amount of future work is indeterminate
until task orders are placed on the contracts. Frequently, these task orders are competitively awarded. Additionally,
these task orders must be funded by the procuring agencies before we can perform work and begin generating
revenues.
Marketing
Our marketing activities are conducted at the operating group level by our marketing and business
development staff and our professional staff of sales representatives, managers, and other personnel. New customer
contacts and information concerning new programs, requirements and opportunities become available through
attendance at industry trade shows and events, through sales calls and client servicing, through negotiation with key
business partners, through formal and informal briefings, from participation in professional organizations, in the
course of contract performance, and from literature published by government, trade associations, professional
organizations and commercial entities.
Personnel
Our employees have a variety of specialized experience, training, and skills that provide the expertise
required to service our clients. Some have high levels of education. As of December 31, 2015, we had 2,057
employees, an increase from 1,589 as of December 31, 2014. Principal employee categories include (a) mechanics
and vehicle, aircraft, and equipment technicians, (b) logisticians, (c) warehouse and sales personnel, (d) engineers and
technicians in mechanical, electronic, industrial, energy and environmental services, (e) information technology
professionals in computer systems, applications and products, configuration, change and data management disciplines,
and (f) environmental specialists. The expertise required by our customers frequently includes knowledge of
government administrative procedures.
We actively seek initiatives and participate in outreach programs to assist individuals who have served in the
U.S. Armed Forces. These efforts include an emphasis on hiring military veterans, which we believe enhances the
quality of our workforce. Approximately one-third of our employees have previously served as members in the U.S.
Armed Forces.
Competition
The supply chain, logistics, and MRO services offered by our Supply Chain Management and Aviation
groups and the federally contracted professional and technical services offered by our Federal Services and IT, Energy
and Management Consulting groups are conducted in very competitive operating environments.
The vehicle parts aftermarket and aviation parts and servicing markets are fragmented, with many large and
small competitors that compete for our customer base.
7
Large diversified federal contracting firms with greater financial resources and larger technical staffs are
capable of providing the same services offered by us. Government agencies emphasize awarding contracts on a
competitive basis as opposed to a sole source or other noncompetitive basis. Most of the significant contracts under
which we currently perform services were either initially awarded on a competitive basis or have been renewed at
least once on a competitive basis. There is no assurance regarding the level of work we may obtain under some of
these contracts. Government budgets, and in particular the budgets of certain government agencies, can also affect
competition in our business. A general decline in government budgets, a reallocation of government spending
priorities, or a reallocation of work for small business set-aside programs that results in lower levels of potential
business in the markets we serve or the services we offer, will cause increased competition. In recent years, contract
awards are frequently protested to the Government Accounting Office (“GAO”).
The extent and range of competition that we will encounter as a result of changing economic or competitive
conditions, customer requirements or technological developments is unpredictable. We believe the principal
competitive factors for our business are customer knowledge, technical and financial qualifications, past performance,
government budgetary stress, with price more heavily weighted than in the past.
Available Information
Copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-
K and amendments to those reports are filed with or otherwise furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. They are available
free of charge through our website www.vsecorp.com as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are
electronically filed with the SEC.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Our future results may differ materially from past results and from those projected in the forward-looking
statements contained in this Form 10-K due to various uncertainties and risks, including but not limited to those risks
set forth below, non-recurring events and other important factors disclosed previously and from time to time in our
other reports filed with the SEC.
Uncertain government budgets and shifting government priorities could delay contract awards and funding
and adversely affect our ability to continue work under our government contracts. Additionally, federal
procurement directives could result in our loss of work on current programs to small business set-asides and
large multiple award contracts.
Our government business is subject to funding delays, terminations, reductions, in-sourcing, extensions, and
moratoriums associated with the government’s budgeting and contracting process. The federal procurement
environment is unpredictable and could adversely affect our ability to perform work under new and existing contracts.
We have experienced delays in contract awards and funding on our contracts in recent years that have adversely
affected our ability to continue existing work and to replace expiring work. Additionally, our government business is
subject to the risk that one or more of our potential contracts or contract extensions may be diverted by the contracting
agency to a small or disadvantaged or minority-owned business pursuant to set-aside programs administered by the
Small Business Administration, or may be bundled into large multiple award contracts for very large businesses. These
risks can potentially have an adverse effect on our revenue growth and profit margins.
Increased market competition resulting from decreases in government spending for contract services and
government contracting award criteria could adversely affect our ability to sustain our revenue levels.
Pressure on government budgets may adversely affect the flow of work to federal contractors, particularly new programs.
Competitor contractors that experience a loss of government work have tended to redirect their marketing efforts toward
the types of work that we perform. This increase in competition for our service offerings has adversely affected our
ability to win new work or successor contracts to continue work that is currently performed by us under expiring contracts.
Unsuccessful bidders frequently protest contract awards, which can delay or reverse the contract awards. Additionally,
the government has trended toward contract award criteria that emphasizes lowest price, technically acceptable bids,
which further intensifies competition in our government markets.
8
Certain programs comprise a material portion of our revenue. Our work on large government programs
presents a risk to revenue and profit growth and sustainability.
The eventual expiration of large government programs or the loss of or disruption of revenues on a single
contract may reduce our revenues and profits. Such revenue losses could also erode profits on our remaining programs
that would have to absorb a larger portion of the fixed corporate costs previously allocated to the expiring programs
or discontinued contract work. Our USPS managed inventory program (“MIP”) and our foreign military sales program
(“FMS Program”) each constitute a material portion of our revenues. This concentration of our revenue subjects us to
risk of material adverse revenue disruptions if customer operational decisions, government contractual, or other issues
prevent or delay the fulfillment of work requirements associated with these key programs. In recent years, our financial
results have been adversely affected by revenue declines for our FMS Program due to the government’s inability to
pass ship transfer legislation which must precede the Navy’s authorization of VSE to perform this work under our
existing FMS contract.
Global economic conditions and political factors could adversely affect our revenues on current government
programs.
Revenues from our government programs for which work is performed in foreign countries are subject to
economic conditions in these countries and to political risks posed by ongoing foreign conflicts and potential terrorist
activity. Services performed by our employees on our FMS Program are, to a certain extent, dependent on our placement
of employees in a client country. Significant domestic and political unrest in client countries can constrain our ability to
maintain consistent staffing levels, resulting in a fluctuating level of services performed by our employees. We cannot
predict when these conditions will occur or the affect it will have on our FMS Program revenues. Regime changes in
these countries can result in U.S. Government restrictions upon the continuation of ongoing work.
Economic conditions in both the United States and foreign countries, and global prices and availability of oil
and other commodities could potentially have an adverse on the demand for some of our services, including our aviation
services.
Due to the nature of our work we could potentially be exposed to legal actions arising from our operations.
Our work includes many manual tasks, including warehousing, shipping and packing of truck parts inventory,
maintaining and repairing military and non-military vehicles and equipment, and maintaining and overhauling U.S.
Navy ships. Some of our work efforts involve the handling of hazardous materials. This may pose certain challenges
that could cause us to be exposed to legal and other liabilities arising from performance issues, work related incidents,
or employee misconduct that result in damages, injury or death to third parties. Such events could cause us to suffer
financial losses and adversely affect our financial condition. (See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”)
Technology security and cyber attack risks could potentially impact our financial results.
We face the threat to our computer systems of unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses,
malicious code, organized cyber-attacks and other security problems and system disruptions, including possible
unauthorized access to our and our clients' proprietary or classified information.
Some of our contract work includes data management and technology services associated with Social
Security Administration and military medical and health records. This exposes us to certain information and
technology security risks. If there is a security breach of sensitive data in our custody or for which we provide services,
we could possibly be held liable for damages to third parties related to such security breach and incur costs to prevent
future incidents. We also provide refurbishment, maintenance and training services support to international clients
directly and through DoD. Foreign nations adverse to international clients we support could be motivated to conduct
a cyber-attack to access information on these programs.
Costs associated with preventing or remediating information management security breaches have not had a
material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position. However, the occurrence of a
future security breach event could potentially have such an adverse effect.
9
Acquisitions, which have been a part of our business strategy in recent years, present certain risks.
The acquisition of a business that subsequently does not meet expected operating and financial performance
targets, the ineffective integration of an acquisition, or the inability of our company to service debt associated with making
an acquisition could adversely affect our financial performance. Also, the failure to make or timely complete an
acquisition could adversely affect our financial performance.
The nature of our operations and work performed by our employees present certain challenges related to work
force management.
Our financial performance is heavily dependent on the abilities of our operating and administrative staff with
respect to technical skills, operating performance, pricing, cost management, safety, and administrative and
compliance efforts. A wide diversity of contract types, nature of work, work locations, and legal and regulatory
complexities challenges our administrative staff and skill sets. We also face challenges associated with our quality of
workforce, quality of work, safety, and labor relations compliance. Our current and projected work in foreign countries
exposes us to challenges associated with export and ethics compliance, local laws and customs, workforce issues,
extended supply chain, political unrest and war zone threats. Failure to attract or retain an adequately skilled
workforce, lack of knowledge or training in critical functions, or inadequate staffing levels can result in lost work,
reduced profit margins, losses from cost overruns, performance deficiencies, workplace accidents, and regulatory
noncompliance.
Our business could be adversely affected by incidents that could cause an interruption in our operations or
impose a significant financial liability on us.
Disruption of our operations due to internal or external system or service failures, accidents or incidents
involving employees or third parties working in high-risk locations, or natural disasters or other crises could adversely
affect our financial performance and condition. A fire, flood, earthquake, or other natural disaster at physical facilities
that support key revenue generating operations, or a procurement system or contractual delay could potentially interrupt
the revenues from our operations.
As a government contractor, we are subject to numerous procurement rules and regulations that could expose
us to potential liabilities or work loss.
We must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the award, administration and
performance of government contracts. Additionally, we are responsible for subcontractor compliance with these laws
and regulations. Government contract laws and regulations affect how we conduct business with our customers and,
in some instances, impose added costs to us. A violation of laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines
and penalties or the termination of contracts or debarment from working or bidding on government contracts.
In some instances, these government contract laws and regulations impose terms or rights that are
significantly more favorable to the government than those typically available to commercial parties in negotiated
transactions. For example, the government may terminate any government contract or subcontract at its convenience,
as well as for performance default.
A termination for default could expose us to liability and have a material adverse effect on our ability to
compete for future contracts and orders. A termination for default could also impact our past performance and ability
to obtain new or additional work. In addition, the government could terminate a prime contract under which we are a
subcontractor, irrespective of the quality of services provided by us as a subcontractor.
Additionally, our contract work that is performed on our behalf by subcontractors is subject to government
compliance, performance requirements and financial risks. If unsatisfactory performance or compliance failure occurs
on the part of our subcontractors, we may have to bear the cost to remedy these deficiencies on our prime contracts.
Environmental and pollution risks could potentially impact our financial results.
Some of our contract work includes the use of chemical solvents and the handling of hazardous materials to
maintain and refurbish vehicles and equipment. This exposes us to certain environmental and pollution risks. Costs
associated with preventing or remediating pollution clean-up efforts and environmental regulatory compliance have
10
not yet had a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position. However, the
occurrence of a future environmental or pollution event could have such an adverse effect.
Our business could be adversely affected by government audits.
Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency and the Department of Labor, routinely
audit and investigate government contractors. These agencies review a contractor’s performance under its contracts,
cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. The government also may review the
adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s
purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Any costs found to be
improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed and any such costs already reimbursed must be
refunded. If an audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and
administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and
suspension or debarment from doing business with the government. In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our
reputation if allegations of impropriety were made.
Investments in facilities could cause losses if certain work is disrupted or discontinued.
We have made investments in facilities and lease commitments to support specific business programs, work
requirements, and service offerings. A slowing or disruption of these business programs, work requirements, or service
offerings that results in operating below intended levels could cause us to suffer financial losses.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
ITEM 2. Properties
Our executive and administrative headquarters are located in a five-story building in Alexandria, Virginia,
with approximately 95,000 square feet of office space leased by us through April 2027.
We own facilities located in an industrial park in Somerset, Pennsylvania that we use to conduct the
operations of our subsidiary Wheeler Bros., Inc. These properties consist of approximately 30 acres of land and
buildings totaling approximately 239,000 square feet of office, engineering, and warehouse space.
We own two properties that we use to conduct the operations of our subsidiary VSE Aviation, Inc. We own
and operate a property consisting of approximately one acre of land and a building with approximately 14,000 square
feet of warehouse and office space in Miami, Florida. We own and operate a property consisting of a building with
approximately 30,500 square feet of warehouse and office space in Independence, Kansas that is located on leased
municipal airport land.
We own and operate two facilities in Ladysmith, Virginia. One of these properties consists of approximately
44 acres of land and multiple storage and vehicle maintenance buildings totaling approximately 56,000 square feet of
space. The other property consists of 30 acres of land and buildings totaling approximately 13,500 square feet of space.
We also own and operate two properties in Texarkana, Arkansas consisting of an aggregate of approximately 16 acres
of land and buildings totaling approximately 114,000 square feet. We use these properties primarily to provide
refurbishment services for military equipment, storage and maintenance.
We also provide services and products from facilities generally occupied under short-term leases primarily
located near customer sites to facilitate communications and enhance program performance. As of December 31, 2015,
we leased approximately 28 such facilities with a total of approximately 358,000 square feet of office and warehouse
space. Our employees often provide services at customer facilities, limiting our requirement for additional space. We
also provide services from locations outside of the United States, generally at foreign shipyards or U.S. military
installations.
11
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
We may have, in the normal course of business, certain claims, including legal proceedings, against us and
against other parties. In our opinion, the resolution of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations or financial position. However, the results of any claims, including legal proceedings, cannot be
predicted with certainty.
On or about May 24, 2012, four complaints were filed in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of
Hawaii, by the estates of five deceased individuals and certain of their relatives against VSE and certain other entities
and individuals. The complaints allege, among other things, that the explosion of fireworks and diesel fuel that injured
and killed the five individuals on or about April 8, 2011 was caused by negligence, actions and omissions of VSE and
the other defendants and their employees, agents and representatives. The five deceased plaintiffs were employees of
Donaldson Enterprises, Inc., which was a vendor retained by VSE to warehouse, store and dispose of fireworks and
other explosives seized by the federal government from entities and persons illegally in possession of the fireworks
and other explosives. We had a prime contract with the U.S. Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) to support the
Treasury Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture to manage various seized assets, including management and disposal
of fireworks and other explosives seized by various federal government agencies. We have denied the allegations and,
together with our insurance carriers, will aggressively defend the proceedings, which are expected to proceed to trial
in 2017. While the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not anticipate that this lawsuit
will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
On or about March 8, 2013, a lawsuit, Anchorage v. Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation, et al.,
was filed in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage by the Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska against
our wholly owned subsidiary Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation (“ICRC”) and two former subcontractors
of ICRC (the “Anchorage Lawsuit”). Two additional defendants have been added to this litigation. With respect to
ICRC, the Anchorage Lawsuit asserts, among other things, breach of contract, professional negligence and negligence
in respect of work and services ICRC rendered under the Port of Anchorage Intermodal Expansion Contract with the
Maritime Administration, a federal agency with the United States Department of Transportation. ICRC did not have
a contract with the Municipality of Anchorage. ICRC’s contract with the Maritime Administration expired on May
31, 2012. In April 2013, ICRC removed the lawsuit to the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. The
Anchorage Lawsuit is expected to proceed to trial in early 2017.
On or about August 21, 2015, a lawsuit, The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity
Company of Connecticut and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Integrated Concepts and Research
Corporation, VSE Corporation and Municipality of Anchorage, was filed against VSE and ICRC in the United States
District Court for the District of Alaska. The plaintiff insurance companies are seeking, among other things, (a) a
declaration by the court that there is no defense or indemnity coverage available to ICRC and VSE for the Anchorage
Lawsuit under the insurance policies issued by the plaintiffs and (b) reimbursement of defense fees and costs incurred
by the plaintiffs in the defense of uncovered claims in respect of the Anchorage Lawsuit.
Currently we cannot predict whether either of the two above-referenced lawsuits related to ICRC will have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
On or about February 27, 2015, a lawsuit, Heritage Disposal and Storage v. VSE Corporation, was filed
against VSE in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. The litigation subsequently was
transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia on November 9, 2015. The lawsuit asserts, among other things, breach
of contract for services rendered related to the storage and manipulation of fireworks. The services relate to a prime
contract that VSE maintains with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The complaint
alleges that VSE has not paid Heritage the full charge for services rendered. Currently, we cannot predict whether
this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Further, from time-to-time, government agencies investigate whether our operations are being conducted in
accordance with applicable contractual and regulatory requirements. Government investigations of us, whether
relating to government contracts or conducted for other reasons, could result in administrative, civil or criminal
liabilities, including repayments, fines or penalties being imposed upon us, or could lead to suspension or debarment
from future government contracting. Government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no
adverse action against us. We believe, based upon current information, that the outcome of any such government
disputes and investigations will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
12
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
ITEM 4(a). Executive Officers of Registrant
Our executive officers are listed below, as well as information concerning their age and positions held with
VSE. There is no family relationships among any of our executive officers. For executive officers who have been
with us fewer than five years, their principal occupations and business experience during the last five years are
provided. The executive officers are appointed annually to serve until the first meeting of VSE’s Board of Directors
(the “Board”) following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and have
qualified, or until death, resignation or removal, whichever is sooner.
Name
Age Position with Registrant
Joseph R. Brown
59
President, Federal Services Group
Maurice A. Gauthier
68 Director, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
Paul W. Goffredi
John T. Harris
58
64
President, VSE’s subsidiary VSE Aviation, Inc.
President, VSE’s subsidiary Akimeka, LLC
Thomas M. Kiernan
48 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Thomas R. Loftus
60 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Nancy Margolis
Chad Wheeler
60
41
President, VSE’s subsidiary Energetics Incorporated
President, VSE’s subsidiary Wheeler Bros., Inc.
Mr. Brown was appointed the President of the Federal Services Group in May 2015. Our Federal Services
Group includes VSE’s Global Maritime Services and Global Land Services divisions. Mr. Brown brings over 19 years
of experience as a program and business unit manager at VSE. Mr. Brown leads an 850-person team, whose primary
focus is refurbishment services to extend and enhance the life of existing vehicles and equipment, fleet-wide ship and
aircraft support, aircraft sustainment and maintenance, foreign military sales and other technical, management,
engineering, logistics, maintenance, configuration management, prototyping, technology, and field support services
to the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps, U.S. Army and Army Reserve, U.S. Air Force, and other U.S. and foreign military
customers. Prior to joining VSE in 1996, Mr. Brown served 20 years active duty in the U.S. Navy. He earned a
Bachelor of Business Administration from University of Maryland University College and an Associate of Science in
Mechanical Engineering from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville.
Mr. Goffredi was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of VSE Aviation, Inc. in January 2015. VSE
Aviation, Inc. includes Prime Turbines (including both U.S. and Germany-based operations), CT Aerospace, Kansas Aviation
and Air Parts & Supply Co. His focus and background includes business development, strategic OEM and major customer
relations, supply chain management, engine and material acquisition, and operational excellence and improvement. Mr.
Goffredi has held leadership positions in the aviation industry for nearly three decades. Prior to joining the VSE team, Mr.
Goffredi served as Chief Operating Officer for Killick Aerospace, and 13 years with BBA Aviation as Program Director for
all Honeywell Engine Programs. Mr. Goffredi received a degree in Business Administration from Mesa State College
(Colorado) in 1980 and holds an MBA in Marketing and Finance from The University of St. Thomas (Texas).
Mr. Wheeler was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of Wheeler Bros., Inc. (“WBI”), in July
2013. He is involved in the executive management of day-to-day operations, government contract administration, new
business development, supply chain initiatives and facilities management. He serves as a member of WBI’s board of
directors. Since 1991, Mr. Wheeler assumed various roles at WBI, including Senior Vice President of Operations, Senior
Vice President of Sales and Marketing, and Marketing and Sales Manager. While serving as Marketing and Sales Manager,
Mr. Wheeler coordinated implementation of WBI’s Managed Inventory Program which is used at the USPS’ Vehicle
Maintenance Facilities throughout the country. Mr. Wheeler graduated summa cum laude from Indiana University of
Pennsylvania in 1998 with a degree in Marketing.
13
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
PART II
Equity Securities
(a)
Market Information
VSE common stock, par value $0.05 per share, is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, trading
symbol, "VSEC," Newspaper listing, "VSE."
The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales price (based on information reported by The
NASDAQ Global Select Market) and cash dividend per share information for our common stock for each quarter and
annually during the last two years.
Quarter Ended
High
Low
Dividends
2014:
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
For the Year
2015:
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
For the Year
(b)
Holders
$53.00
70.35
74.86
66.23
$74.86
$84.06
83.89
55.35
67.86
$84.06
$39.98
52.85
47.51
48.85
$39.98
$63.00
52.31
33.52
38.08
$33.52
$0.09
0.10
0.10
0.10
$0.39
$0.10
0.11
0.11
0.11
$0.43
As of February 8, 2016, VSE common stock, par value $0.05 per share, was held by approximately 227
stockholders of record. The number of stockholders of record is not representative of the number of beneficial holders
because many of VSE’s shares are held by depositories, brokers or nominees.
(c)
Dividends
In 2014 cash dividends were declared quarterly at the annual rate of $0.36 per share through March 31, 2014,
and at the annual rate of $0.40 per share commencing June 1, 2014.
In 2015 cash dividends were declared quarterly at the annual rate of $0.40 per share through March 31, 2015,
and at the annual rate of $0.44 per share commencing June 1, 2015.
Pursuant to our bank loan agreement (see Note 7, Debt, of "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in
Item 8 of this Form 10-K), the payment of cash dividends is subject to annual rate restrictions. We have paid cash
dividends each year since 1973 and have increased our dividend each year since 2004.
14
(d)
Certain Sales and Repurchases of VSE Common Stock
During the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, VSE did not sell any of its equity securities that were not
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this
Form 10-K, no purchases of equity securities of VSE were made by or on behalf of VSE or any “affiliated purchaser”
(as defined in Exchange Act Rule 10b-18 (a)(3)) [other than 4,105 shares of our restricted common stock that were
forfeited to the Company by participants in the VSE 2006 Restricted Stock Plan to cover their personal tax liability
for restricted stock awards].
(e)
Equity Compensation Plan Information
We have two compensation plans approved by our stockholders under which our equity securities are
authorized for issuance to employees and directors: (i) the VSE Corporation 2004 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Plan and (ii) the VSE Corporation 2006 Restricted Stock Plan (the “2006 Plan”). On May 6, 2014, the stockholders
approved (i) amendments to the 2006 Plan extending the term thereof until May 6, 2021 and authorizing an additional
250,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2006 Plan and (ii) an amendment to the 2004 Non-
Employee Directors Stock Plan extending the term thereof from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2018.
As of December 31, 2015, 66,406 shares of VSE common stock were available for future issuance under the
VSE Corporation 2004 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan and 261,880 shares of VSE common stock were available
for future issuance under the 2006 Plan.
15
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total return of VSE common stock with (a) a
performance index for the broad market (The NASDAQ Global Select Market) on which VSE common stock is traded
and (b) a published industry index. VSE common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, and our
industry group is engineering and technical services (formerly SIC Code 8711). Accordingly, the performance graph
compares the cumulative total return for VSE common stock with (a) an index for The NASDAQ Global Select Market
(U.S. companies) (“NASDAQ Index”) and (b) our peer group.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among VSE Corporation, the NASDAQ Composite Index, and a Peer Group
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
12/10
12/11
12/12
12/13
12/14
12/15
VSE Corporation
NASDAQ Composite
Peer Group
*$100 invested on 12/31/10 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.
Performance Graph Table
VSE
NASDAQ Composite
Peer Group
2010
100
100
100
2011
74.29
100.53
90.84
2012
75.95
116.92
96.08
2013
150.27
166.19
148.44
2014
2015
207.65 197.29
188.78 199.95
149.00 156.89
16
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
(in thousands, except per share data)
Years ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Revenues
$533,982
$424,071
$471,638
$546,755
$580,762
Income from continuing operations
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
Net income
$24,918
-
$24,918
$20,489
(1,124)
$19,365
$23,990
(1,138)
$22,852
$27,364
(6,070)
$21,294
$20,190
362
$20,552
Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
Net income
Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
Net income
Cash dividends per common share
$4.64
-
$4.64
$4.62
-
$4.62
$0.43
$3.83
(0.21)
$3.62
$3.82
(0.21)
$3.61
$0.39
$4.50
(0.21)
$4.29
$4.49
(0.21)
$4.28
$0.35
As of December 31,
$5.18
(1.15)
$4.03
$5.15
(1.14)
$4.01
$0.31
$3.86
0.07
$3.93
$3.83
0.07
$3.90
$0.27
Working capital
Total assets
Long-term debt
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
$104,393
$34,871
$47,691
$64,976
$71,123
$622,134
$355,330
$380,529
$410,211
$454,512
$216,125
$23,563
$64,487
$116,377
$144,759
Long-term lease obligations
$23,251
$24,584
$25,721
$27,435
$33,938
Stockholders' equity
$229,309
$205,489
$186,803
$164,335
$143,600
This consolidated summary of selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 of this Form 10-K
and with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The historical
results set forth in this Item 6 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected in the future.
17
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Overview
Customers and Services
We are a diversified services company that assists our clients in sustaining, extending the service life, and
improving the performance of their transportation, equipment, and other assets and systems. We provide logistics services
for legacy systems and equipment and professional and technical services to the United States Government (the
"government"), including the United States Postal Service ("USPS"), the United States Department of Defense ("DoD"),
federal civilian agencies, commercial customers, and to other customers. Our largest customers are the USPS and DoD.
Our operations include supply chain management solutions and parts supply for vehicle fleets; maintenance, repair, and
overhaul (“MRO”) services and parts supply for aviation clients; vehicle and equipment maintenance and refurbishment;
logistics; engineering; energy and environmental services; IT and health care IT solutions; and consulting services. See
Item 1 “Business – Revenues and Contracts” on page 6 for revenues by customer.
Acquisitions
In January 2015, we acquired four related businesses that provide MRO services and parts supply for general
aviation jet aircraft engines and engine accessories. The acquired businesses include Air Parts & Supply Co., Kansas
Aviation of Independence, L.L.C., Prime Turbines LLC (including both U.S. and German based operations), and CT
Aerospace LLC. These four businesses currently operate as a combined group, our Aviation Group, managed by our
wholly owned subsidiary VSE Aviation, Inc., which retained certain key management members of the former ownership
group.
On December 31, 2015, we acquired Ultra Seating Company, a company that manufactures and distributes
seating for heavy duty and light duty commercial trucks, fork lifts, and service vehicles for truck fleets and original
equipment manufacturers. Ultra Seating Company will operate under our Wheeler Bros., Inc. subsidiary.
Organization and Segments
Our operations are conducted within four reportable segments aligned with our management groups: 1)
Supply Chain Management; 2) Aviation; 3) Federal Services; and 4) IT, Energy and Management Consulting.
Supply Chain Management Group – Our Supply Chain Management Group provides sourcing, acquisition,
scheduling, transportation, shipping, logistics, data management, and other services to assist our clients with supply
chain management efforts. This group consists of our wholly owned subsidiary Wheeler Bros., Inc. ("WBI"). The
primary revenue source for this group is WBI's USPS Managed Inventory Program ("MIP") that supplies vehicle parts
and mission critical supply chain support for the USPS truck fleet. Other current work efforts include managed
inventory services and parts sales to support commercial client truck fleets, parts sales to DoD, and other projects to
support the USPS.
Aviation Group – Our Aviation Group provides MRO services, parts supply and distribution, and supply
chain solutions for general aviation jet aircraft engines and engine accessories. This group consists of our four aviation
businesses acquired in January 2015 (the “Aviation Acquisition”). These businesses have a diversified client base
serving corporate and private aircraft owners, regional airlines, aviation manufacturers, other aviation MRO providers,
cargo transporters, and agricultural clients.
Federal Services Group - Our Federal Services Group provides foreign military sales services,
refurbishment services to extend and enhance the life of existing vehicles and equipment, fleet-wide ship and aircraft
support, aircraft sustainment and maintenance, and other technical, management, engineering, logistics, maintenance,
configuration management, prototyping, technology, and field support services to the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps,
U.S. Army and Army Reserve, U.S. Air Force, and other customers. Significant work efforts for this group include
assistance to the U.S. Navy in executing its Foreign Military Sales (“FMS”) Program for surface ships sold, leased or
granted to foreign countries, our U. S. Army Reserve vehicle refurbishment program, various vehicle and equipment
maintenance and sustainment programs for U. S. Army commands, various task orders under the U.S. Air Force
Contract Field Teams (“CFT”) Program, and, beginning in August 2015, our Ft. Benning Logistics Support Services
Program supporting base operations and logistics at Fort Benning, Georgia.
18
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group – Our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group
provides technical and consulting services primarily to various DoD and federal civilian agencies, including the United
States Departments of Energy, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, and Interior; the Social Security
Administration; the National Institutes of Health; customers in the military health system; and other government
agencies and commercial clients. This group consists of our wholly owned subsidiaries Energetics Incorporated
("Energetics") and Akimeka, LLC ("Akimeka"). Energetics provides technical, policy, business, and management
support in areas of energy modernization, clean and efficient energy, climate change mitigation, infrastructure
protection, and measurement technology. Akimeka offers solutions in fields that include medical logistics, medical
command and control, e-health, information assurance, public safety, enterprise architecture development, business
continuity, program and portfolio management, network IT services, cloud managed services, systems design and
integration, quality assurance services, and product and process improvement services.
Concentration of Revenues
Source of Revenues
USPS MIP
FMS Program
U.S. Army Reserve
Other
Total Revenues
Management Outlook
(in thousands)
Years ended December 31,
2015
$174,665
76,476
32,533
250,308
$533,982
%
33
14
6
47
100
2014
$160,742
86,399
47,765
129,165
$424,071
%
38
20
11
31
100
2013
$142,147
94,950
60,162
174,379
$471,638
%
30
20
13
37
100
We finished 2015 showing a marked improvement in our operating results over the prior year. Strong
performance from our supply chain operations and the addition of our aviation MRO, parts supply and distribution
businesses were the primary drivers behind this growth. Additionally, financial performance of our contracted services
businesses to our traditional markets showed steady improvement as the year progressed. We believe that our 2015
results suggest continued improvements in our overall performance going into 2016.
Our Supply Chain Management Group has demonstrated continued growth in both new and existing markets
and offerings in 2015. Our vehicle parts supply and inventory management support for the USPS delivery vehicle
fleet, and support to the USPS in adapting its fleet for greater package delivery demand, are the primary drivers of this
group’s growth and successful results. The USPS is a key client for which our mission critical supply chain support
should continue to be essential in sustaining its aging fleet as this client embarks on a lengthy transition to a new
replacement fleet. We believe that our years of service and knowledge of this client’s needs strategically position us
to participate on industry teams in the prospective competition to provide the next generation USPS delivery vehicles.
Independent of that outcome, we anticipate servicing this eventual replacement fleet in the same manner we serve the
existing fleet. We also are experiencing successful results from marketing our supply chain solutions to commercial
clients operating large vehicle fleets, and we have bolstered our access to commercial markets with our acquisition of
Ultra Seating Company. Additionally, we increased our sales of vehicle parts to the DoD in 2015. We believe the
potential exists to continue revenue growth for this group.
We have successfully integrated our Aviation Group, which has made significant contributions to our
operating results in 2015. Our Aviation Group has provided us with a wide range of new clients, enabling us to
diversify our business to include a substantial portion of revenue from commercial clients. We are seeking to extend
this group’s offerings to our traditional U.S. and international military client base. Our Aviation Group is a valuable
part of our strategy to expand our markets for sustainment services while diversifying our revenue base and
strengthening growth potential.
Our revenue and operating income levels from DoD and federal civilian agencies served by our Federal
Services group showed improvement in the second half of 2015. We began work on our contract to provide logistics
support services to the Fort Benning Logistics Readiness Center, which began generating revenues in the third quarter
of 2015 and has contract options that call for performance over a five and one half year period. We have seen an
increase in new contract awards and funding, including funding totaling approximately $178 million during the second
19
half of 2015. In December 2015 government authorization to transfer two frigates to Taiwan under our FMS Program
was finalized, and as a result we expect revenue increases under this program. We believe these events position us
well for 2016 and future years and we look forward to improved results from our government contract work.
Through our work with foreign client countries, we have developed strong international business
relationships through which we are directly marketing our services to international clients.
Bookings and Funded Backlog
Revenues for federal government contract work performed by our Federal Services and IT, Energy and
Management Consulting groups depend on contract funding (“bookings”), and bookings generally occur when
contract funding documentation is received. Funded contract backlog is an indicator of potential future revenue for
these groups. While bookings and funded contract backlog generally result in revenue, we may occasionally have
funded contract backlog that expires or is de-obligated upon contract completion and does not generate revenue.
Bookings for our Supply Chain Management and Aviation groups occur at the time of sale. Accordingly,
these groups do not generally have funded contract backlog and backlog is not an indicator of their potential future
revenues. Due to the nature of revenues generated by our Supply Chain Management and Aviation groups, we include
only our Federal Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting groups in our disclosure relative to bookings
and funded contract backlog.
A summary of our bookings and revenues for our Federal Services and IT, Energy and Management Groups
for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and funded contract backlog for these groups as of December
31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is as follows (in millions):
Bookings
Revenues
Funded Backlog
Contract Award and Protest
2015
$281
$217
$238
2014
$217
$252
$193
2013
$354
$317
$234
In December 2015, we were awarded a task order on one of our contracts to provide logistics support,
maintenance, repair, overhaul, modification and upgrade of military vehicles and other equipment for the Red River
Army Depot. The task order has a total potential value of $243.8 million over three and one half years, if all options
are exercised, and is estimated to require over 1,100 VSE and supporting subcontractor employees. The award was
subsequently protested, and a ruling on the protest will likely be made in March or April 2016.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codifications, to
increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the
balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The ASU will become effective for us in
January 2019. Early adoption of the ASU is permitted. We currently are assessing the impact, if any that this standard
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,
which amends the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and
noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Organizations will now be required to classify all deferred tax assets and
liabilities as noncurrent. The ASU will become effective for us in January 2017. Early adoption of the ASU is
permitted. We currently are assessing the impact, if any that this standard will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying
the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which eliminates the requirement to account for measurement-
period adjustments retrospectively. The ASU instead requires an acquirer to recognize a measurement-period
20
adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment. We adopted the standard on
January 1, 2015 and will prospectively apply the standard to business combination adjustments identified after the
date of adoption.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance
Costs. Under the new standard, debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are required to be presented
in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts.
The guidance in ASU 2015-03 is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning
after December 15, 2015. We currently are assessing the impact that this standard will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which outlines
a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and
supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The ASU is based on the
principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount
that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The
ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows
arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized
from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. The effective date of the ASU was recently deferred for one year to the interim
and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective
date – interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. We currently are assessing the impact
that this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States, which require us to make estimates and assumptions. We believe the following critical accounting
policies affect the more significant accounts, particularly those that involve judgments, estimates and assumptions used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services
have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable.
Substantially all of our Supply Chain Management Group revenues result from the sale of vehicle parts to
clients. We recognize revenue from the sale of vehicle parts when the customer takes ownership of the parts.
Our Aviation Group revenues are recognized upon the shipment or delivery of products to customers based
on when title or risk of loss transfers to the customer. Sales returns and allowances are not significant.
Substantially all of our Federal Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting work is performed for
our customers on a contract basis. The three primary types of contracts used are time and materials, cost-type, and
fixed-price. Revenues result from work performed on these contracts by our employees and our subcontractors and
from costs for materials and other work related costs allowed under our contracts.
Revenue recognition methods on fixed-price contracts will vary depending on the nature of the work and the
contract terms. Revenues on fixed-price service contracts are recorded as work is performed, typically ratably over
the service period. Revenues on fixed-price contracts that require delivery of specific items are recorded based on a
price per unit as units are delivered.
Revenues on cost-type contracts are recorded as contract allowable costs are incurred and fees are earned.
Our FMS Program contract is a cost plus award fee contract. This contract has terms that specify award fee payments
that are determined by performance and level of contract activity. Award fees are made during the year through a
contract modification authorizing the award fee that is issued subsequent to the period in which the work is performed.
We recognize award fee income on the FMS Program contract when the fees are fixed or determinable. Due to such
21
timing, and to fluctuations in the level of revenues, profits as a percentage of revenues on this contract will fluctuate
from period to period.
Revenues for time and materials contracts are recorded on the basis of contract allowable labor hours worked
multiplied by the contract defined billing rates, plus the direct costs and indirect cost burdens associated with materials
and subcontract work used in performance on the contract. Generally, profits on time and materials contracts result
from the difference between the cost of services performed and the contract defined billing rates for these services.
A summary of revenues for our operating groups, including a summary by contract type for our Federal
Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting groups, for the years ended December 31 is presented below (in
thousands).
Contract Type
Supply Chain Management and
Aviation Group revenues
Cost-type
Fixed-price
Time and materials
Total Federal Services and IT, Energy
and Management Consulting revenues
Total revenues
2015
Revenues
%
2014
Revenues
%
2013
Revenues
%
$316,501
59.3
$172,482
40.7
$154,702
32.8
100,447
74,490
42,544
18.8
13.9
8.0
120,915
87,807
42,867
28.5
20.7
10.1
119,350
102,487
95,099
25.3
21.7
20.2
217,481
$533,982
40.7
100.0
251,589
$424,071
59.3
100.0
316,936
$471,638
67.2
100.0
We will occasionally perform work at risk, which is work performed prior to formalizing contract funding
for such work. Revenue related to work performed at risk is not recognized until it can be reliably estimated and its
realization is probable. We recognize this “risk funding” as revenue when the associated costs are incurred or the work
is performed. We are at risk of loss for any risk funding not received. Revenues recognized as of December 31, 2015
include approximately $1.5 million for which we had not received formalized funding. We believe that we are entitled
to reimbursement and expect to receive all of this funding.
Earn-out Obligations
We value our Aviation Acquisition earn-out obligations using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow
method. Significant unobservable inputs used to value the contingent consideration include projected earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and the discount rate. Interest expense and subsequent changes in the
fair value of the earn-out obligations are recognized in earnings for the period of the change.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is subject to a review for impairment at least annually. We perform an annual review of goodwill for
impairment during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
may not be recoverable. The impairment assessment requires us to estimate the fair value of our reporting units and
involves the use of subjective assumptions. We estimated the fair value of our reporting units using a weighting of fair
values derived from the income approach, market approach, and comparative transactions approach with the heaviest
weighting placed on the income approach. Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit
based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Cash flow projections are based on our estimates of revenue
growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rate used
is based on a weighted average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with the characteristics of the
business and the projected cash flows.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, we performed our annual goodwill impairment analysis for each of our reporting
units. The results of the impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of our Akimeka reporting unit within our IT,
Energy, and Management Consulting Group exceeded its carrying value by approximately 9%. Akimeka has experienced
a reduction in services performed due to a decline in services ordered by clients on contracts, contract expirations, and
the government’s practice of awarding the types of work performed by Akimeka on expiring contracts to small businesses
as set-aside contracts. Based on our assessment of these circumstances, we have determined that Akimeka is at risk of a
future goodwill impairment if there is further deterioration of projected cash flows or negative changes in market factors.
22
The carrying value of our Akimeka reporting unit included goodwill of approximately $29.8 million as of December 31,
2015.
As of December 31, 2015, we have no intangible assets with indefinite lives and we had an aggregate of
approximately $199 million of goodwill associated with our acquisitions.
Results of Operations
Revenues
(in thousands)
Years ended December 31,
Supply Chain Management Group
Aviation Group
Federal Services Group
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group
2015
$196,772
119,729
166,973
50,508
$533,982
%
36.8
22.4
31.3
9.5
100.0
2014
$172,482
-
190,761
60,828
$424,071
%
40.7
-
45.0
14.3
100.0
2013
$154,702
-
242,343
74,593
$471,638
%
32.8
-
51.4
15.8
100.0
Our revenues increased by approximately $110 million or 26% for the year ended December 31, 2015 as
compared to the prior year. The change in revenues for this period resulted from an increase of approximately $120
million due to the inclusion our Aviation Group in our operating results in 2015, an increase in our Supply Chain
Management Group of approximately $24 million, a decrease in our Federal Services Group of approximately $24
million, and a decrease in our IT, Energy, and Management Consulting Group of approximately $10 million.
Our revenues decreased by approximately $48 million or 10% for the year ended December 31, 2014 as
compared to the prior year. The change in revenues for this period resulted from a decrease in our Federal Services
Group of approximately $52 million, a decrease in our IT, Energy, and Management Consulting Group of
approximately $14 million, and an increase in our Supply Chain Management Group of approximately $18 million.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands)
Years ended December 31,
Revenues
Contract costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Operating income
Interest expense, net
Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Income from continuing operations
(Loss) income from discontinued operations,
net of tax
2015
$533,982
480,155
3,288
50,539
9,544
40,995
16,077
24,918
%
100.0
89.9
0.6
9.5
1.8
7.7
3.0
4.7
2014
$424,071
383,001
4,140
36,930
3,983
32,947
12,458
20,489
%
100.0
90.3
1.0
8.7
0.9
7.8
3.0
4.8
2013
$471,638
424,250
3,285
44,103
5,789
38,314
14,324
23,990
%
100.0
90.0
0.7
9.3
1.2
8.1
3.0
5.1
-
-
(1,124)
(0.2)
(1,138)
(0.2)
Net income
$ 24,918
4.7
$ 19,365
4.6
$ 22,852
4.9
Contract costs consist primarily of direct costs including inventory, labor, material, and supplies used in the
delivery of our products and performance of our work, and indirect costs associated with these direct costs. These
costs will generally increase or decrease in conjunction with products sold or the level of work associated with our
revenues.
Our contract costs increased by approximately $97 million or 25% in 2015 as compared to 2014. The change
in contract costs resulted from an increase of approximately $109 million due to the inclusion our Aviation Group in
our operating results, an increase in our Supply Chain Management Group of approximately $19 million, a decrease
23
in our Federal Services Group of approximately $22 million, and a decrease in our IT, Energy, and Management
Consulting Group of approximately $8 million.
Our contract costs decreased by approximately $41 million or 10% in 2014 as compared to 2013. The
decrease resulted from a decrease in our Federal Services Group of approximately $45 million, a decrease in our IT,
Energy, and Management Consulting Group of approximately $11 million, and an increase in our Supply Chain
Management Group of approximately $15 million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs and expenses that are not chargeable
or reimbursable on our operating unit contracts. These costs decreased by approximately $852 thousand for 2015 as
compared to the prior year. These costs included legal, consulting, professional services fees and other costs associated
with our acquisitions of approximately $618 thousand in 2015 and approximately $1.1 million in 2014.
Our operating income increased by approximately $13.6 million or 37% in 2015 as compared to 2014. The
increase resulted primarily from an increase of approximately $10.6 million due to the inclusion our Aviation Group
in our operating results in 2015, an increase in our Supply Chain Management Group of approximately $5.8 million,
a decrease in our Federal Services Group of approximately $1.4 million, and a decrease in our IT, Energy, and
Management Consulting Group of approximately $1.9 million.
Our operating income decreased by approximately $7.2 million or 16% in 2014 as compared to 2013. The
decrease resulted primarily from a decrease of approximately $6 million in our Federal Services Group and a decrease
of approximately $2.4 million in our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group. These decreases were partially
offset by an increase in operating income in our Supply Chain Management Group of approximately $2.4 million.
Interest expense increased in 2015 as compared to 2014, primarily due to an increase in borrowing to finance
our Aviation Acquisition. Interest expense decreased in 2014 as compared to 2013, due to reductions in our borrowing
to pay down our bank debt. Interest expense also includes interest related to our executive and administrative
headquarters facility lease. The amount of interest expense associated with capital leases is approximately $1.6 million
for 2015, approximately $1.7 million for 2014, and approximately $1.7 million for 2013.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate from continuing operations was 39.2% for 2015, 37.8% for 2014, and 37.4% for 2013.
Our tax rate is affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but may not be consistent from year to
year. In addition to state income taxes, certain tax credits and other items can impact the difference between our
statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate of 35% and our effective tax rate. A Canadian tax obligation and approximately
$900 thousand of transaction costs that will not be deducted for tax purposes, both associated with our Aviation
Acquisition, resulted in an increase to our effective tax rate of approximately 1.3 percentage points for 2015. Other
permanent differences and federal and state tax credits such as the work opportunity tax credit and a state educational
improvement tax credit provided a benefit to our tax rates of 1.2 percentage points for 2015, 1.7 percentage points for
2014 and 1.9 percentage points for 2013.
Supply Chain Management Group Results
The results of operations for our Supply Chain Management Group are (in thousands):
Revenues
Contract costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Operating income
Years ended December 31,
2015
$196,772
161,124
195
$ 35,453
%
100.0
81.9
0.1
18.0
2014
$172,482
142,201
587
$ 29,694
%
100.0
82.5
0.3
17.2
2013
$154,702
126,869
534
$ 27,299
%
100.0
82.0
0.4
17.6
Revenues for our Supply Chain Management Group increased approximately $24 million or 14% for 2015,
as compared to the prior year. The revenue increase resulted primarily from increases in WBI’s USPS MIP revenues
and to DoD and commercial customer revenues and other projects performed for the USPS. Contract costs for our
Supply Chain Management Group increased by approximately $19 million or 13% and operating income increased
by approximately $5.8 million or 19% for 2015 as compared to the prior year. Contract cost and operating income
24
increases resulted primarily from the increase in USPS MIP revenues. Operating income for this segment was
decreased by approximately $527 thousand in 2015 and by approximately $3.1 million in 2014 due to adjustments to
the accrued earn-out obligation for our WBI acquisition. The earn-out period for our WBI acquisition ended at June
30, 2015, finalizing the earn-out obligation amount, and the final earn-out payment for this obligation was made in
September 2015.
Revenues for our Supply Chain Management Group increased approximately $18 million or 11% for 2014,
as compared to the prior year. The revenue increase resulted primarily from an increase in WBI’s USPS MIP revenues
and to additional revenues associated with other projects performed for the USPS and revenues from new customers.
DoD revenues for this group declined slightly in 2014 as compared to the prior year. Contract costs for our Supply
Chain Management Group increased by approximately $15 million or 12% and operating income increased by
approximately $2.4 million or 9% for 2014 as compared to the prior year. Contract cost and operating income increases
resulted primarily from the increase in USPS MIP revenues. Operating income for this segment was decreased by
approximately $3.1 million in 2014 and by approximately $183 thousand in 2013 due to adjustments to the accrued
earn-out obligation for our WBI acquisition.
Aviation Group Results
The results of operations for our Aviation Group since the acquisition date of January 28, 2015 are as follows (in
thousands):
Revenues
Contract costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Operating income
Year ended December 31,
2015
$119,729
108,813
281
$ 10,635
%
100.0
90.9
0.2
8.9
Contract costs for this group include expense for amortization of intangible assets associated with the Aviation
Acquisition, allocated corporate costs, and a valuation adjustment to the accrued earn-out obligation associated with
the acquisition. Expense for amortization of intangible assets was approximately $6.1 million, allocated corporate
costs were approximately $4.5 million, and the valuation adjustment to earn-out obligation decreased these costs by
$101 thousand. We finalized the purchase price accounting of our Aviation Acquisition during the fourth quarter of
2015. As such, we determined during the fourth quarter that approximately $700 thousand of indirect costs expensed
in previous quarters was required to be capitalized as inventory.
Federal Services Group Results
The results of operations for our Federal Group are (in thousands):
Revenues
Contract costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Operating income
Years ended December 31,
2015
$166,973
164,314
588
$ 2,071
%
100.0
98.4
0.4
1.2
2014
$190,761
186,690
619
$ 3,452
%
100.0
97.9
0.3
1.8
2013
$242,343
231,538
1,336
$ 9,469
%
100.0
95.5
0.6
3.9
Revenues for our Federal Services Group decreased approximately $24 million or 12% and contract costs
decreased approximately $22 million or 12% for 2015, as compared to the prior year. Revenues for this group
decreased approximately $52 million or 21% and contract costs decreased approximately $45 million or 19% for 2014,
as compared to the prior year.
Significant items affecting changes in our revenues and contract costs for 2015 included a decrease in revenue
of approximately $15.2 million associated with a reduction in our Army Reserve vehicle refurbishment work, a
decrease in revenue of approximately $9.9 million associated with a reduction in our FMS Program services, a
decrease in revenue of approximately $9.3 million associated with the completion of our U.S. Treasury Seized Assets
25
Program in March 2014, and an increase in revenue of approximately $8.5 million associated with the start of our Ft.
Benning Logistics Support Services Program.
Operating income and profit percentage decreases for 2015 resulted primarily from the decrease in revenues
and to certain facility and infrastructure costs that could not be reduced as rapidly as the decline in the revenues on
the programs that these costs supported. We have reduced costs in this group and believe that we are achieving balance
between revenue levels and the supporting cost structure. These cost reductions and increased revenues have resulted
in the improvement in operating income in the second half of 2015.
The decrease in revenues and contract costs for 2014 was primarily attributable to a decrease in revenue of
approximately $27 million associated with the completion of our U.S. Treasury Seized Assets Program in March 2014,
to a reduction in our Army Reserve vehicle refurbishment work of approximately $12 million, to a decrease in revenue
of approximately $9 million on our FMS Program, and to smaller revenue decreases in our CFT Program services and
other work.
Operating income for our Federal Services Group decreased by approximately $6 million or 64% for 2014,
as compared to the prior year. The decrease in operating income for 2014 was primarily attributable to a decrease of
approximately $3.5 million associated with the completion of our U.S. Treasury Seized Assets Program in March
2014, a reduction of profits on our U.S. Army Reserve vehicle refurbishment program of approximately $1 million
due to the reduction in revenues on this program, and to the continuation of fixed infrastructure costs during the time
that revenue levels declined. Our operating income was reduced in 2014 by a charge of approximately $398 thousand
for a Department of Treasury claim for an inventory shortage, and was reduced in 2013 by a charge of approximately
$1.2 million associated with idle warehouse facilities associated with our Seized Asset Programs.
Profit margins in this group can vary due to fluctuations in contract activity and the timing of contract award
fees associated with our FMS Program. Award fee evaluations on our FMS Program occur three times per year and
we recognize award fee revenue and income in the period we receive contractual notification of the award. We
recognized award fee revenue and income in 2015 from three award fee notifications.
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group Results
The results of operations for our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group are (in thousands):
Revenues
Contract costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Operating income
Years ended December 31,
2015
$50,508
45,713
64
$ 4,731
%
100.0
90.5
0.1
9.4
2014
$60,828
54,119
75
$ 6,634
%
100.0
89.0
0.1
10.9
2013
$74,593
65,359
173
$ 9,061
%
100.0
87.6
0.2
12.2
Revenues for our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group decreased approximately $10 million or
17% for 2015, as compared to the prior year. Contract costs decreased approximately $8 million or 16% for 2015, as
compared to the prior year. The revenue and contract cost decreases resulted primarily from a decline in services
ordered by clients, contract expirations, and a loss of work performed by this group on expiring contracts for which
the follow-on work was awarded to small businesses on set-aside contracts. Operating income for this segment
decreased approximately $1.9 million or 29% for 2015, as compared to the prior year. The decrease in operating
income is primarily attributable to the decrease in revenue and lower profit margins resulting from cost balancing
challenges associated with the lower revenue levels
Revenues for our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group decreased approximately $14 million or
18% for 2014, as compared to the prior year. Contract costs for this group decreased approximately $11 million or
17% for 2014, as compared to the prior year. The decreases in revenues and contract costs were due primarily to a
decline in services ordered by clients on continuing contracts and the expiration of a contract in the fourth quarter of
2013. Revenue on the expired contract was approximately $7.6 million for 2013. Operating income for this segment
decreased approximately $2.4 million, or 27% for 2014, as compared to the prior year. The decrease in operating
income is primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues and lower profit margins associated with new contracts
that replaced predecessor contracts, which were partially offset by indirect cost reductions and efficiencies.
26
Financial Condition
There has been no material adverse change in our financial condition in 2015. Our capital structure has
changed as a result of our Aviation Acquisition in January 2015 and associated bank financing. Our bank debt
increased by approximately $186 million during this period. Changes to asset and liability accounts were due primarily
to our earnings, our level of business activity, the timing of inventory purchases, contract delivery schedules,
subcontractor and vendor payments required to perform our contract work, the timing of associated billings to and
collections from our customers, and the Aviation Acquisition.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately $477 thousand during 2015.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased by approximately $12.1 million in 2015 as compared to
2014. The change is attributable to a decrease of approximately $19.2 million due to changes in the levels of operating
assets and liabilities; an increase of approximately $5.6 million in cash provided by net income; and an increase of
approximately $1.5 million in depreciation and amortization and other non-cash operating activities.
Our inventories and accounts receivable represent a significant amount of our assets, and our accounts
payable represent a significant amount of our operating liabilities. Cash used related to increases in inventory was
approximately $10.4 million and cash used related to increases in accounts receivable was approximately $8.1 million
for 2015. Inventory levels and accounts payable may fluctuate depending on the timing and amounts of inventory
purchases. A significant portion of our accounts receivable and accounts payable result from the use of subcontractors
to perform work on our contracts and from the purchase of materials to fulfill our contract obligations. Accordingly,
our levels of accounts receivable and accounts payable may fluctuate depending on the timing of services ordered and
products sold, government funding delays, the timing of billings received from subcontractors and materials vendors,
and the timing of payments received for services. Such timing differences have the potential to cause significant
increases and decreases in our inventory, accounts receivable, and accounts payable in short time periods, and
accordingly, can cause increases or decreases in our cash provided by operations.
Cash used in investing activities increased approximately $202 million in 2015 as compared to 2014. Cash
used in investing activities for 2015 included approximately $195 million for acquisitions and approximately $11
million for purchases of property and equipment primarily related to the expansion of our WBI facilities.
Cash provided by financing activities was approximately $168 million in 2015 as compared to cash used in
financing activities of approximately $46 million in 2014. This difference was primarily due to bank borrowing to
finance our acquisitions in 2015. We used approximately $12 million for earn-out obligation payments.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased by approximately $6.9 million in 2014 as compared to 2013.
The change is attributable to a decrease of approximately $8.4 million due to changes in the levels of operating assets
and liabilities; an increase of approximately $5 million in depreciation and amortization and other non-cash operating
activities; and a decrease of approximately $3.5 million in cash provided by net income.
Cash used in investing activities decreased approximately $1.0 million in 2014 as compared to 2013. Cash
used in investing activities consisted of purchases of property and equipment.
Cash used in financing activities decreased approximately $7.2 million in 2014 as compared to 2013. Cash
used in financing activities consisted primarily of repayments on our bank loan, earn-out obligation payments, and
dividends.
We paid cash dividends totaling approximately $2.3 million or $0.42 per share during 2015. Pursuant to our
bank loan agreement, our payment of cash dividends is subject to annual restrictions. We have paid cash dividends
each year since 1973 and have increased our dividend each year since 2004.
27
Liquidity
Our internal sources of liquidity are primarily from operating activities, specifically from changes in our level
of revenues and associated inventory, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, and from profitability. Significant
increases or decreases in revenues and inventory, accounts receivable, and accounts payable can impact our liquidity.
Our inventory and accounts payable levels can be affected by the timing of large opportunistic inventory purchases.
Our accounts receivable and accounts payable levels can be affected by changes in the level of contract work we
perform, by the timing of large materials purchases and subcontractor efforts used in our contracts, and by delays in
the award of contractual coverage and funding and payments. Government funding delays can cause delays in our
ability to invoice for revenues earned, presenting a potential negative impact on our days sales outstanding.
We also purchase property and equipment; invest in expansion, improvement, and maintenance of our
operational and administrative facilities; and invest in the acquisition of other companies. In 2015, our acquisitions
required a significant use of cash.
Our external financing consists of an amended loan agreement with a bank group that provides for a term
loan, revolving loans, and letters of credit, all with a termination date of January 2020. The amended agreement was
implemented in January 2015 concurrent with our Aviation Acquisition.
The term loan requires quarterly installment payments. Our scheduled term loan payments after December
31, 2015 are $17.8 million in 2016, $21.6 million in 2017, $28.1 in 2018, $30 million in 2019, and $36.3 million in
2020. The amount of our term loan borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2015 was $133.8 million.
The maximum amount of credit available to us from the banking group for revolving loans and letters of
credit as of December 31, 2015 was $150 million. We may borrow and repay the revolving loan borrowings as our
cash flows require or permit. We pay an unused commitment fee and fees on letters of credit that are issued. We had
approximately $101 million in revolving loan amounts outstanding and no letters of credit outstanding as of December
31, 2015. The timing of certain payments made and collections received associated with our inventory, subcontractor,
and materials requirements and other operating expenses can cause fluctuations in our outstanding revolving loan
amounts. Delays in government funding of our work performed can also cause additional borrowing requirements.
Under the loan agreement we may elect to increase the maximum availability of the term loan facility, the
revolving loan facility, or a combination of both facilities up to an aggregate additional amount of $75 million.
We pay interest on the term loan borrowings and revolving loan borrowings at LIBOR plus a base margin or
at a base rate (typically the prime rate) plus a base margin. As of December 31, 2015, the LIBOR base margin was
2.5% and the base rate base margin was 1.25%. At inception of the amended and restated loan agreement the LIBOR
base margin is 2.25% and the base rate base margin was 1.00%. The base margins increase or decrease in steps as our
Total Funded Debt/EBITDA Ratio increases or decreases.
The terms of the loan agreement require us to have interest rate hedges on a portion of the outstanding term loan
for the first three years of the agreement. We executed such compliant interest rate hedges in February 2015. After taking
into account the impact of hedging instruments, as of December 31, 2015, interest rates on portions of our outstanding
debt ranged from 2.82% to 4.75%, and the effective interest rate on our aggregate outstanding debt was 3.29%.
The loan agreement contains collateral requirements to secure our loan agreement obligations, restrictive
covenants, a limit on annual dividends, and other affirmative and negative covenants, conditions and limitations.
Restrictive covenants include a maximum Total Funded Debt/EBITDA Ratio, which decreases over time, and a
minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. We were in compliance with the financial covenants and other terms and
conditions at December 31, 2015.
Total Funded Debt/EBITDA Ratio
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
Current Maximum Ratio
3.25 to 1
Minimum Ratio
1.20 to 1
Actual Ratio
2.97 to 1
Actual Ratio
1.71 to 1
We currently do not use public debt security financing.
28
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015 are (in thousands):
Contractual Obligations
Bank loan debt
Operating leases, net of non-cancelable
sublease income
Corporate headquarters lease, net of non-
cancelable sublease income
Purchase obligations
Total
Payments Due by Period
Total
$234,724
Less than
1 year
$17,812
1-3 years
$49,688
4-5 years
$167,224
After
5 years
$ -
6,859
3,287
2,888
677
7
52,754
1,228
$295,565
3,410
850
$25,359
8,441
378
$61,395
9,035
-
$176,936
31,868
-
$31,875
Estimated cash requirements for interest on our bank loan debt are approximately $6.6 million for 2016 and
$5.2 million for 2017.
Operating lease commitments are primarily for leased facilities for office, shop, and warehouse space.
Equipment and software leases are also included in these amounts.
We have a 15-year lease agreement related to our executive and administrative headquarters facility. Terms
of our lease agreement have required us to capitalize the construction costs of the leased building and account for the
lease upon occupancy in May 2012 under the finance method of lease accounting rules.
Purchase obligations consist primarily of contractual commitments associated with our information
technology systems. The table excludes contractual commitments for materials or subcontractor work purchased to
perform government contracts. Such commitments for materials and subcontractors are reimbursable when used on
the contracts, and generally are also reimbursable if a contract is “terminated for convenience” by the government
pursuant to federal contracting regulations.
Inflation and Pricing
Most of our contracts provide for estimates of future labor costs to be escalated for any option periods, while
the non-labor costs in our contracts are normally considered reimbursable at cost. Our property and equipment consists
principally of land, buildings and improvements, shop and warehouse equipment, computer systems equipment, and
furniture and fixtures. We do not expect the overall impact of inflation on replacement costs of our property and
equipment to be material to our future results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
Interest Rates
Our bank loans provide available borrowing to us at variable interest rates. Accordingly, future interest rate
changes could potentially put us at risk for a material adverse impact on future earnings and cash flows. To mitigate
the risks associated with future interest rate movements we have employed interest rate hedges to fix the rate on a
portion of our outstanding borrowings for various periods. The resulting fixed rates on this portion of our debt are
higher than the variable rates and have increased our net effective rate, but have given us protection us against interest
rate increases.
In February 2015, we entered into a LIBOR based interest rate swap on our term loan for a term of four
years with a notional amount of $100 million. The swap amount on our term loan decreases in increments on an
annual basis. With the term loan swap in place, we pay an effective rate of 1.129% plus our base margin. Also in
February 2015, we entered into a LIBOR based interest rate swap on our revolving loan for a term of three years
with a notional amount of $25 million. With the revolving loan swap in place, we pay an effective rate of 0.95%
plus our base margin. In February 2016, the rate on both the term loan swap and the revolving loan swap will
increase to 1.25% plus our base margin.
29
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index To Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
30
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of VSE Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based
on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated March 3, 2016 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 3, 2016
31
VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables, net
Inventories
Deferred tax assets
Other current assets
Total current assets
Property and equipment, net
Intangible assets, net
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt
Accounts payable
Current portion of earn-out obligations
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Dividends payable
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt, less current portion
Deferred compensation
Long-term lease obligations, less current portion
Earn-out obligations, less current portion
Deferred tax liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
As of December 31,
2015
2014
$ 740
78,471
109,123
$ 263
59,391
49,363
3,613
1,834
9,423
201,370
64,308
143,043
198,545
14,868
$622,134
$ 17,557
40,084
9,678
29,067
591
96,977
216,125
11,169
23,251
10,166
35,137
392,825
11,517
122,368
52,911
72,209
92,052
15,790
$355,330
$ 24,837
29,424
9,455
23,245
536
87,497
23,563
12,563
24,584
-
1,634
149,841
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.05 per share, authorized 15,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 5,375,532 and 5,358,261 respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
269
21,637
207,478
(75)
229,309
$622,134
268
20,348
184,873
-
205,489
$355,330
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
32
VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Revenues:
Products
Services
Total revenues
Contract costs:
Products
Services
Total contract costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Operating income
Interest expense, net
For the years ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
$318,141
215,841
533,982
271,901
208,254
480,155
3,288
$172,986
251,085
424,071
$157,332
314,306
471,638
142,997
240,004
383,001
4,140
129,027
295,223
424,250
3,285
50,539
36,930
44,103
9,544
3,983
5,789
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
40,995
32,947
38,314
Provision for income taxes
16,077
12,458
14,324
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
24,918
-
20,489
(1,124)
23,990
(1,138)
Net income
$ 24,918
$ 19,365
$ 22,852
Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net income
$ 4.64
-
$ 4.64
$ 3.83
(0.21)
$ 3.62
$ 4.50
(0.21)
$ 4.29
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
5,373,613
5,353,912
5,329,208
Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net income
$ 4.62
-
$ 4.62
$ 3.82
(0.21)
$ 3.61
$ 4.49
(0.21)
$ 4.28
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
5,393,635
5,371,200
5,343,267
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
33
VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in thousands)
For the years ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
Net income
Change in fair value of interest rate swap
agreements
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Comprehensive income
$24,918
(75)
(75)
$24,843
$19,365
$22,852
201
201
$19,566
536
536
$23,388
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
34
VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands except per share data)
Common Stock
Balance at December 31, 2012
Net income
Stock-based compensation
Change in fair value of interest rate swap
agreements, net of tax
Dividends declared ($0.35 per share)
Balance at December 31, 2013
Net income
Stock-based compensation
Change in fair value of interest rate swap
agreements, net of tax
Dividends declared ($0.39 per share)
Balance at December 31, 2014
Net income
Stock-based compensation
Change in fair value of interest rate swap
agreements, net of tax
Dividends declared ($0.43 per share)
Balance at December 31, 2015
Shares
5,293
-
40
-
-
5,333
-
25
-
-
5,358
-
17
-
-
5,375
Amount
$265
-
2
-
-
267
-
1
-
-
268
-
1
-
-
$269
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
$18,193
-
946
Retained
Earnings
$146,614
22,852
-
-
-
19,139
-
1,209
-
-
20,348
-
1,289
-
(1,868)
167,598
19,365
-
-
(2,090)
184,873
24,918
-
-
-
$21,637
-
(2,313)
$207,478
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
$(737)
-
-
536
-
(201)
-
-
201
-
-
-
-
(75)
-
$ (75)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
$164,335
22,852
948
536
(1,868)
186,803
19,365
1,210
201
(2,090)
205,489
24,918
1,290
(75)
(2,313)
$229,309
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
35
VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred taxes
Stock-based compensation
Earn-out obligation adjustment
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of impact of acquisitions:
Receivables, net
Inventories
Other current assets and noncurrent assets
Accounts payable and deferred compensation
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Long-term lease obligations
Earn-out obligations
Other liabilities
For the years ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
$ 24,918
$ 19,365
$ 22,852
25,541
84
2,081
426
-
(8,139)
(10,381)
6,031
(362)
1,919
(1,275)
(3,269)
-
18,770
3,083
1,739
3,059
-
18,996
(10,048)
(627)
(1,224)
(1,024)
(1,107)
-
(1,267)
20,016
(874)
1,576
183
790
14,130
2,240
(3,798)
1,922
(597)
(1,826)
-
(16)
Net cash provided by operating activities
37,574
49,715
56,598
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(10,562)
507
(195,135)
(3,414)
-
-
(4,416)
-
-
Net cash used in investing activities
(205,190)
(3,414)
(4,416)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings on loan agreement
Repayments on loan agreement
Earn-out obligation payments
Payment of debt financing costs
Payments on capital lease obligations
Payment of taxes for equity transactions
Dividends paid
519,313
(333,222)
(11,713)
(2,699)
(986)
(342)
(2,258)
295,513
(336,601)
(1,972)
-
(850)
(314)
(2,034)
290,137
(340,627)
(180)
-
(725)
(257)
(1,811)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
168,093
(46,258)
(53,463)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
477
263
$ 740
43
220
$ 263
(1,281)
1,501
$ 220
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Cash paid for:
Interest
Income taxes
$6,621
$15,949
$2,135
$9,934
$ 4,192
$15,638
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
36
VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
(1) Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business
The term “VSE,” the “Company,” “us,” “we,” or “our” means VSE and its subsidiaries and divisions unless
the context indicates operations of only VSE as the parent company.
Our operations include supply chain management solutions and parts supply for vehicle fleets; maintenance,
repair, and overhaul (“MRO”) services and parts supply for aviation clients; vehicle and equipment maintenance and
refurbishment; logistics; engineering; energy and environmental services; IT and health care IT solutions; and
consulting services. We provide logistics services for legacy systems and equipment and professional and technical
services to the United States Government (the "government"), including the United States Postal Service ("USPS"),
the United States Department of Defense ("DoD"), federal civilian agencies, commercial customers, and to other
customers.
Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements consist of the operations of our parent company, our wholly owned subsidiaries,
Energetics Incorporated (“Energetics”), Akimeka, LLC (“Akimeka”), Wheeler Bros., Inc. (“WBI”) and VSE Aviation,
Inc. (“VAI”), and our unincorporated divisions. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These
consolidated financial statements also account for the classification of the Infrastructure Group as discontinued operations of
our subsidiary Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation (“ICRC”) and therefore any financial impact of such group has
been presented as discontinued operations in the 2014 and 2013 reporting periods.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant
estimates affecting the financial statements include accruals for contract disallowance reserves, recoverability of
goodwill and intangible assets and earn-out obligations.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for share-based awards in accordance with the applicable accounting rules that require the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based on estimated fair
values. The compensation expense, included in contract costs, is amortized over the requisite service period. See Note
9, Stock-Based Compensation Plans, for further discussion of our stock-based compensation plans and related activity.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Shares issued during the period are weighted for the portion
of the period that they were outstanding. Our calculation of diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive
effects for the assumed vesting of restricted stock awards.
37
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive shares
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
Cash and Cash Equivalents
2015
5,373,613
20,022
5,393,635
Years Ended December 31,
2014
5,353,912
17,288
5,371,200
2013
5,329,208
14,059
5,343,267
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Due to the short maturity of these instruments, the carrying values on our consolidated balance sheets
approximate fair value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation of computer equipment, furniture, other equipment
is provided principally by the straight-line method over periods of 3 to 15 years. Depreciation of buildings and land
improvements is provided by the straight-line method over periods of approximately 15 to 20 years. Amortization of
leasehold improvements is provided by the straight-line method over the lesser of their useful life or the remaining
term of the lease.
Concentration of Credit Risk/Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash
equivalents and trade receivables. Contracts with the government, either as a prime or subcontractor, accounted for
approximately 76% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 99% of revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013. We believe that concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited
as they are primarily government receivables. We believe that the fair market value of all financial instruments,
including debt, approximate book value.
Revenues
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services
have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable.
Substantially all of our Supply Chain Management Group revenues result from the sale of vehicle parts to
clients. We recognize revenue from the sale of vehicle parts when the customer takes ownership of the parts.
Our Aviation Group revenues are recognized upon the shipment or delivery of products to customers based
on when title or risk of loss transfers to the customer. Sales returns and allowances are not significant.
Substantially all of our Federal Services and IT, Energy and Management Consulting work is performed for
our customers on a contract basis. The three primary types of contracts used are time and materials, cost-type, and
fixed-price. Revenues result from work performed on these contracts by our employees and our subcontractors and
from costs for materials and other work related costs allowed under our contracts.
Revenue recognition methods on fixed-price contracts will vary depending on the nature of the work and the
contract terms. Revenues on fixed-price service contracts are recorded as work is performed, typically ratably over
the service period. Revenues on fixed-price contracts that require delivery of specific items are recorded based on a
price per unit as units are delivered.
Revenues on cost-type contracts are recorded as contract allowable costs are incurred and fees are earned.
Our FMS Program contract is a cost plus award fee contract. This contract has terms that specify award fee payments
that are determined by performance and level of contract activity. Award fees are made during the year through a
contract modification authorizing the award fee that is issued subsequent to the period in which the work is performed.
We recognize award fee income on the FMS Program contract when the fees are fixed or determinable. Due to such
timing, and to fluctuations in the level of revenues, profits as a percentage of revenues on this contract will fluctuate
from period to period.
38
Revenues for time and materials contracts are recorded on the basis of contract allowable labor hours worked
multiplied by the contract defined billing rates, plus the direct costs and indirect cost burdens associated with materials
and subcontract work used in performance on the contract. Generally, profits on time and materials contracts result
from the difference between the cost of services performed and the contract defined billing rates for these services.
Revenue related to work performed on government contracts at risk, which is work performed at the
customer’s request prior to the government formalizing funding, is not recognized until it can be reliably estimated
and its realization is probable.
A substantial portion of contract and administrative costs are subject to audit by the Defense Contract Audit
Agency. Our indirect cost rates have been audited and approved for 2009 and prior years with no material adjustments
to our results of operations or financial position. While we maintain reserves to cover the risk of potential future audit
adjustments based primarily on the results of prior audits, we do not believe any future audits will have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Receivables are recorded at amounts earned less an allowance for doubtful accounts. We review our
receivables regularly to determine if there are any potentially uncollectible accounts. The majority of our receivables
are from government agencies, where there is minimal credit risk. We record allowances for bad debt as a reduction
to receivables and an increase to bad debt expense. We assess the adequacy of these reserves by considering general
factors, such as the length of time individual receivables are past due and historical collection experience.
Inventories
Inventories for our Supply Chain Group are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out
(“FIFO”) method. Included in inventory are related purchasing, storage, and handling costs. Our inventory primarily
consists of vehicle replacement parts.
Inventories for our Aviation Group are stated at lower of cost or market. Inventories for our Aviation Group
primarily consist of general aviation jet aircraft engines and engine accessories and parts. The cost for purchased
engines and parts is determined by the specific identification method. Included in inventory are related purchasing,
overhaul labor, storage, and handling costs. We also purchase aircraft engines for disassembly into individual parts
and components.
Deferred Compensation Plans
We have a deferred compensation plan, the VSE Corporation Deferred Supplemental Compensation Plan
(“DSC Plan”), to provide incentive and reward for certain management employees based on overall corporate
performance. We maintain the underlying assets of the DSC Plan in a Rabbi Trust and changes in asset values are
included in contract costs on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. We invest the assets held by the
Rabbi Trust in both corporate owned life insurance (“COLI”) products and in mutual funds. The COLI investments
are recorded at cash surrender value and the mutual fund investments are recorded at fair value. The DSC Plan assets
are included in other assets and the obligation to the participants is included in deferred compensation on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Deferred compensation plan expense recorded as contract costs in the accompanying consolidated statements
of income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 was approximately $1.9 million, $1.3 million, and
$1.4 million, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include property and equipment to be held and used. We review the carrying values of
long-lived assets other than goodwill for impairment if events or changes in the facts and circumstances indicate that
their carrying values may not be recoverable. We assess impairment by comparing the estimated undiscounted future
cash flows of the related asset to its carrying value. If an asset is determined to be impaired, we recognize an
impairment charge in the current period for the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value.
39
No impairment charges related to intangible assets, other than goodwill, were recorded in the years ended
December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. This
method also requires the recognition of future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards, to the extent that
realization of such benefits is more likely than not. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income
in the period that includes the enactment date.
The carrying value of net deferred tax assets is based on assumptions regarding our ability to generate
sufficient future taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets.
Goodwill
We test goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The goodwill impairment test involves
a two-step process. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair
value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not impaired and no further testing is
required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we must perform the second step of the
impairment test to measure the amount of the goodwill impairment loss. In the second step, the reporting unit's fair
value is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets,
in a hypothetical analysis that calculates the implied fair value of goodwill in the same manner as if the reporting unit
was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is less than the
carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment loss. Based on our annual goodwill impairment analysis
we performed during the fourth quarter of 2015, the fair value of our reporting units exceeded their carrying values.
Intangibles
Intangible assets consist of the value of contract-related intangible assets, trade names and acquired
technologies acquired in acquisitions. We amortize on a straight-line basis intangible assets acquired as part of
acquisitions over their estimated useful lives unless their useful lives are determined to be indefinite. The amounts
we record related to acquired intangibles are determined by us considering the results of independent valuations. Our
contract-related intangibles are amortized over their estimated useful lives of approximately seven to 16 years with a
weighted-average life of approximately 12.6 years as of December 31, 2015. We have four trade names that are
amortized over an estimated useful life of approximately nine years. We have an acquired technologies intangible
asset that is amortized over an estimated useful life of 11 years. The weighted-average life for all amortizable
intangible assets is approximately 12.2 years as of December 31, 2015.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codifications, to
increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the
balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The ASU will become effective for us in
January 2019. Early adoption of the ASU is permitted. We currently are assessing the impact, if any that this standard
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,
which amends the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and
noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Organizations will now be required to classify all deferred tax assets and
liabilities as noncurrent. The ASU will become effective for us on January 2017. Early adoption of the ASU is
permitted. We currently are assessing the impact, if any that this standard will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
40
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying
the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which eliminates the requirement to account for measurement-
period adjustments retrospectively. The ASU instead requires an acquirer to recognize a measurement-period
adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment. We adopted the standard on
January 1, 2015 and will prospectively apply the standard to business combination adjustments identified after the
date of adoption.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance
Costs. Under the new standard, debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are required to be presented
in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts.
The guidance in ASU 2015-03 is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning
after December 15, 2015. We currently are assessing the impact that this standard will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which outlines
a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and
supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The ASU is based on the
principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount
that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The
ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows
arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized
from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. The effective date of the ASU was recently deferred for one year to the interim
and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective
date – interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. We currently are assessing the impact
that this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.
(2) Receivables, net
Total receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $100 thousand and $0 as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were as follows (in thousands):
Billed
Unbilled
Total receivables
2015
$ 43,503
34,968
$ 78,471
2014
$ 26,709
32,682
$ 59,391
The unbilled balance includes certain costs for work performed at risk but which we believe will be funded
by the government totaling approximately $1.5 million and $2.9 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. We expect to invoice substantially all unbilled receivables during 2016.
(3) Other Current Assets and Other Assets
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, other current assets primarily consisted of vendor advances, prepaid rents
and deposits, prepaid income taxes, software licenses, prepaid maintenance agreements and deferred contract costs.
At December 31, 2015 other assets primarily consisted of deferred compensation plan assets and capitalized loan fees.
At December 31, 2014 other assets primarily consisted of deferred compensation plan assets and cash surrender value
of life insurance policies.
41
(4) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Buildings and building improvements
Computer equipment
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
Leasehold improvements
Land and land improvements
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
Total property and equipment, net
2015
$ 51,148
27,504
27,384
2,036
4,214
112,286
(47,978)
$ 64,308
2014
$45,825
25,327
17,603
3,567
3,410
95,732
(42,821)
$52,911
Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014
and 2013 was approximately $9.1 million, $7.9 million and $9 million, respectively.
(5) Acquisitions
VSE Aviation
On January 28, 2015, we acquired 100% of the voting interests of four related businesses that specialize in
maintenance, repair and overhaul (“MRO”) services and parts supply for general aviation jet aircraft engines and
engine accessories. The businesses acquired include Air Parts & Supply Co., Kansas Aviation of Independence,
L.L.C., Prime Turbines LLC (including both U.S. and German-based operations), and CT Aerospace LLC
(collectively, the “Aviation Acquisition”). These four businesses are operating as a combined group managed by our
wholly owned subsidiary VSE Aviation, Inc. (“VAI”). The Aviation Acquisition provides diversification by adding
service offerings and broadening our client base.
The initial purchase consideration paid at closing for the Aviation Acquisition was approximately $189
million, which included an estimated net working capital adjustment of approximately $5 million. We may also be
required under an earn-out obligation to make additional purchase price payments of up to $40 million if the acquired
businesses meet certain financial targets during the first two post-closing years. An additional purchase price
consideration of $5 million was paid to the sellers in September 2015 because certain of the acquired businesses
surpassed agreed upon financial targets during a 12- consecutive month period in 2014 and 2015. Of the payment
made at closing, $18 million was deposited into an escrow account to secure the sellers’ indemnification obligations
(the “Indemnification Amount”). Any remaining Indemnification Amount at the end of the indemnification period not
encumbered as a result of any then pending indemnification claims will be distributed to the sellers. VAI’s results of
operations are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date of
January 28, 2015. VAI had revenues of approximately $120 million and operating income of approximately $10.6
million from the acquisition date through December 31, 2015. VAI’s operating income includes amortization of
intangible assets of approximately $6.1 million.
The fair values assigned to our earn-out obligation and intangible assets acquired were based on estimates,
assumptions, and other information compiled by management, including independent valuations that utilized
established valuation techniques. Based on the Company’s valuation, the total consideration of approximately $192
million (excluding any earn-out payments), which includes a final cash and net working capital consideration of $2.4
million, has been allocated to assets acquired (including identifiable intangible assets and goodwill) and liabilities
assumed (including deferred taxes on identifiable intangible assets that are not deductible for income tax purposes),
as follows (in thousands):
42
Description
Cash
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Property and equipment
Customer relationships
Trade name
Goodwill
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Long-term deferred tax liability
Cash consideration
Acquisition date fair value of earn-out obligation
Total
Fair Value
$ 502
10,627
49,000
3,436
10,725
78,500
6,400
104,549
(9,435)
(4,719)
(32,773)
$216,812
$191,867
24,945
$216,812
The value attributed to customer relationships is being amortized on a straight-line basis using weighted
average useful lives of approximately 14 years. The value attributed to trade name is being amortized on a straight-
line basis over nine years. None of the value attributed to goodwill, customer relationships and trade name is deductible
for income tax purposes. The amount of goodwill recorded for the Aviation Acquisition was approximately $104
million and reflects the strategic advantage of expanding our supply chain management and MRO capabilities through
the addition of new service offerings to new markets.
We incurred approximately $528 thousand of acquisition-related expenses during the year ended December
31, 2015 which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
The following VSE unaudited consolidated pro forma results are prepared as if the Aviation Acquisition had
occurred on January 1, 2014. This information is for comparative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the
results that would have occurred or may occur in the future. The following unaudited consolidated pro forma results
of operations are as following (in thousands except per share amounts):
Years
ended December 31,
2015
2014
$536,867
$541,387
$26,040
$25,267
$4.86
$4.70
$4.85
$4.68
Revenue
Income from continuing operations
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Ultra Seating
On December 31, 2015, we acquired 100% of the voting interest in Ultra Seating Company (“Ultra Seating”)
for an initial purchase price of approximately $3.8 million (subject to adjustment). Ultra Seating provides specialized
seating for heavy duty and light duty commercial trucks. Ultra Seating will be included in our Supply Chain
Management Group and complements our WBI subsidiary by expanding our current supply chain markets and
establishing a distribution channel to better serve mission critical vehicle fleets. We are in the process of finalizing
our valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Based on preliminary estimates, we recorded $1.9 million
of goodwill and $1.5 million of intangible assets primarily related to customer relationships and a trade name.
43
(6) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Changes in goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of December 31, 2013
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Increase from acquisitions
Balance as of December 31, 2015
Supply Chain
Management
$61,169
$61,169
1,944
$63,113
IT, Energy and
Management
Consulting
$30,883
$30,883
-
$30,883
Aviation
$ -
$ -
104,549
$104,549
Total
$ 92,052
$ 92,052
106,493
$198,545
The results of our annual goodwill impairment testing indicated that the fair value of our reporting units
exceeded their carrying values as of October 1, 2015.
Intangible assets consist of the value of contract-related assets, technologies and trade names. Amortization
expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $15.6 million, $10 million and
$10.2 million, respectively.
Intangible assets were composed of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2015
Contract and customer-related
Acquired technologies
Trade names
Total
December 31, 2014
Contract and customer-related
Acquired technologies
Trade names
Total
Accumulated
Amortization
Accumulated
Impairment
Loss
Net Intangible
Assets
$(46,611)
(5,151)
(6,384)
$(58,146)
$(33,840)
(4,024)
(4,706)
$(42,570)
$(1,025)
-
-
$(1,025)
$(1,025)
-
-
$(1,025)
$125,448
7,249
10,346
$143,043
$ 58,439
8,376
5,394
$ 72,209
Cost
$173,084
12,400
16,730
$202,214
$ 93,304
12,400
10,100
$115,804
Future expected amortization of intangible assets is as follows for the years ending December 31, (in
thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
Amortization
$ 16,130
16,080
16,080
16,016
15,425
63,312
$143,043
(7) Debt
We have a loan agreement with a group of banks. In January 2015, we amended the loan agreement to fund our
Aviation Acquisition, provide working capital for our continuing operations, and retire our existing debt. Both the former
and the amended loan agreements are comprised of a term loan facility and a revolving loan facility. The revolving loan
facility provides for revolving loans and letters of credit. The amended loan agreement expires in January 2020. Financing
costs associated with the inception of the amended loan agreement of approximately $2.7 million were capitalized and
are being amortized over the five-year life of the loan.
44
The term loan requires quarterly installment payments. Our scheduled term loan payments after December 31,
2015 are $17.8 million in 2016, $21.6 million in 2017, $28.1 million in 2018, $30 million in 2019, and $36.3 million in
2020. The amount of our term loan borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2015 was $133.8 million.
The maximum amount of credit available to us from the banking group for revolving loans and letters of credit
as of December 31, 2015 was $150 million. We may borrow and repay the revolving loan borrowings as our cash flows
require or permit. We pay an unused commitment fee and fees on letters of credit that are issued. We had approximately
$101 million in revolving loan amounts outstanding and no letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2015. We
had approximately $23.6 million in revolving loan amounts outstanding and no of letters of credit outstanding as of
December 31, 2014.
Under the loan agreement we may elect to increase the maximum availability of the term loan facility, the
revolving loan facility, or a combination of both facilities up to an aggregate additional amount of $75 million.
Total bank loan borrowed funds outstanding as of December 31, 2015, including term loan borrowings and
revolving loan borrowings, were approximately $234.7 million. Total bank loan borrowed funds outstanding as of
December 31, 2014 were $48.6 million. The fair value of outstanding debt under our bank loan facilities as of December
31, 2015 approximates its carrying value using Level 2 inputs based on market data on companies with a corporate rating
similar to ours that have recently priced credit facilities.
We pay interest on the term loan borrowings and revolving loan borrowings at LIBOR plus a base margin or at
a base rate (typically the prime rate) plus a base margin. As of December 31, 2015, the LIBOR base margin was 2.5%
and the base rate base margin was 1.25%. The base margins increase or decrease in increments as our Total Funded
Debt/EBITDA Ratio increases or decreases.
The terms of the loan agreement require us to have interest rate hedges on a portion of the outstanding term loan
for the first three years of the agreement. We executed interest rate hedges in February 2015 that complied with these
terms. The amount of swapped debt outstanding as of December 31, 2015 was $125 million.
After taking into account the impact of hedging instruments, as of December 31, 2015, interest rates on portions
of our outstanding debt ranged from 2.82% to 4.75%, and the effective interest rate on our aggregate outstanding debt
was 3.29%.
Interest expense incurred on bank loan borrowings and interest rate hedges was approximately $7.3 million and
$2 million during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The loan agreement contains collateral requirements to secure our loan agreement obligations, restrictive
covenants, a limit on annual dividends, and other affirmative and negative covenants, conditions and limitations.
Restrictive covenants include a maximum Total Funded Debt/EBITDA Ratio, which decreases over time, and a minimum
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. We were in compliance with the financial covenants and other terms and conditions at
December 31, 2015.
(8) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist primarily of accrued compensation and benefits of
approximately $19.2 million and $16.7 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The accrued
compensation and benefits amounts include bonus, salaries and related payroll taxes, vacation and deferred
compensation.
(9) Stock-Based Compensation Plans
In 2006, our stockholders approved the VSE Corporation 2006 Restricted Stock Plan for its directors, officers
and other employees (the “2006 Plan”). On May 6, 2014, the stockholders approved amendments to the 2006 Plan
extending the term thereof until May 6, 2021 and authorized an additional 250,000 shares of our common stock for
issuance under the 2006 Plan. Under the 2006 Plan terms, we are authorized to issue up to 500,000 shares of our
common stock and, as of December 31, 2015, 261,880 shares remained available for issuance under the 2006 Plan.
45
The Compensation Committee is responsible for the administration of the 2006 Plan, and determines each recipient
of an award under the 2006 Plan, the number of restricted shares of common stock subject to such award and the
period of continued employment required for the vesting of such award. These terms are included in award agreements
between us and the recipients of the award.
During 2015 and 2014, Non-employee directors were awarded 9,000 and 10,800 shares of restricted stock,
respectively, under the 2006 Plan. The weighted average grant-date fair value of these restricted stock grants was
$68.58 per share and $47.22 per share for the shares awarded in 2015 and 2014, respectively. The shares issued vested
immediately and cannot be sold, transferred, pledged or assigned before the second anniversary of the grant date.
Compensation expense related to these grants was approximately $617 thousand and $510 thousand during 2015 and
2014, respectively.
In January of every year since 2007, we have notified certain employees that they are eligible to receive
awards of VSE stock under our 2006 Plan, based on our financial performance for the respective fiscal years. These
restricted stock awards are expensed and a corresponding liability is recorded on an accelerated basis over the vesting period of
approximately three years. Upon issuance of shares on each vesting date, the liability is reduced and additional paid-in capital
is increased. The date of award determination is expected to be in March 2016 for the 2015 awards. The date of
award determination for the 2014 awards and the 2013 awards was March 2, 2015 and March 2, 2014, respectively.
On each vesting date, 100% of the vested award is paid in our shares. The number of shares issued is based on the
fair market value of our common stock on the vesting date. The earned amount is expensed on an accelerated basis
over the vesting period of approximately three years. On March 2, 2015, the employees eligible for the 2014 awards,
2013 awards and 2012 awards received a total of 7,602 shares of common stock. The grant-date fair value of these
awards was $83.20 per share.
The total stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards for the years ended December
31, are as follows (in thousands):
Employees
Non-employee Directors
Total
2015
$ 1,423
617
$ 2,040
2014
$ 1,104
510
$ 1,614
2013
$1,163
413
$1,576
Employees are permitted to use a certain number of shares of restricted stock to cover their personal tax
liability for restricted stock awards. We paid approximately $342 thousand, $314 thousand and $257 thousand, to
cover this liability in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These payments are classified
as financing cash flows on the consolidated statements of cash flows. As of December 31, 2015, the total compensation
cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was approximately $962 thousand with a weighted average
amortization period of 1.9 years.
Stock-based compensation consisted of restricted stock awards, was included in contract costs and the
following line items on the accompanying statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and
2013 (in thousands):
Stock-based compensation included in contract costs
Income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of income tax
benefit
2015
$2,081
(800)
2014
$1,739
(669)
2013
$1,576
(606)
$1,281
$1,070
$ 970
(10) Income Taxes
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state and local jurisdictions. We
have concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters as well as material state and local tax matters for years through
2011.
46
We file consolidated federal income tax returns that include all of our subsidiaries. The components of the
provision for income taxes from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as
follows (in thousands):
Current
Federal
State
Deferred
Federal
State
Provision for income taxes
2015
2014
2013
$ 13,641
2,352
15,993
73
11
84
$16,077
$ 7,889
1,486
9,375
2,595
488
3,083
$12,458
$12,654
2,544
15,198
(848)
(26)
(874)
$14,324
The differences between the amount of tax computed at the federal statutory rate of 35% and the provision
for income taxes from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows
(in thousands):
Tax at statutory federal income tax rate
Increases (decreases) in tax resulting from:
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Permanent differences, net
Other, net
Provision for income taxes
2015
$14,348
1,683
88
(42)
$16,077
2014
$11,531
1,486
(516)
(43)
$12,458
2013
$13,410
1,630
(685)
(31)
$14,324
The tax effect of temporary differences representing deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31,
2015 and 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
Gross deferred tax assets
Deferred compensation and accrued paid leave
Accrued expenses
Stock-based compensation
Interest rate swaps
Reserve for contract disallowances
Acquisition-related expenses
Capitalized inventory
Other
Total gross deferred tax assets
Gross deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation
Deferred revenues
Goodwill and intangible assets
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets
(11) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Leases and Other Commitments
2015
2014
$ 6,943
2,228
765
47
119
503
1,080
3
11,688
$ 6,992
1,276
592
-
287
982
589
5
10,723
(3,912)
(2,189)
(37,111)
(43,212)
(2,830)
(2,676)
(5,017)
(10,523)
$(31,524)
$ 200
We have various non-cancelable operating leases for facilities, equipment, and software with terms between
two and 15 years. The terms of the facilities leases typically provide for certain minimum payments as well as increases
47
in lease payments based upon the operating cost of the facility and the consumer price index. Rent expense is
recognized on a straight-line basis for rent agreements having escalating rent terms. Lease expense for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was as follows (in thousands):
2015
2014
2013
Operating
Lease
Expense
$5,824
$6,576
$9,826
Sublease
Income
$506
$119
$531
Net
Expense
$5,318
$6,457
$9,295
Future minimum annual non-cancelable commitments as of December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
Lease
Commitments
$3,341
2,113
854
510
167
7
$6,992
Operating Leases
Sublease
Income
Net
Commitments
$ 54
50
29
-
-
-
$133
$3,287
2,063
825
510
167
7
$6,859
We signed a lease in 2009 for a building to serve as our headquarters with a rent commencement date of May
1, 2012. Certain terms in the lease agreement resulted in the capitalization of construction costs due to specific
accounting rules. We recorded a construction asset and corresponding long-term liability of approximately $27.3
million on May 1, 2012, which represents the construction costs incurred by the landlord as of that date. According
to accounting rules, we have forms of continuing involvement that require us to account for this transaction as a
financing lease upon commencement of the lease period. The building and building improvements will remain on our
consolidated balance sheet and will be depreciated over a 15-year period. Payments made under the lease agreement
are applied to service the financing obligation and interest expense based on an imputed interest rate amortizing the
obligation over the life of the lease agreement.
Future minimum annual non-cancelable commitments under our headquarters lease as of December 31, 2015,
which are not included in the table above, are as follows (in thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
(b) Contingencies
Lease
Commitments
$ 4,104
4,221
4,336
4,456
4,579
31,868
$53,564
Sublease
Income
Net
Commitments
$694
116
-
-
-
-
$810
$ 3,410
4,105
4,336
4,456
4,579
31,868
$52,754
We are one of the primary defendants in a multiple plaintiff wrongful death action in Hawaii related to a
fireworks explosion that occurred in April 2011 at a facility operated by one of our subcontractors, which resulted in
the death of five subcontractor employees. The litigation is expected to proceed to trial in 2017. While the results of
litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not anticipate that this litigation will have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations or financial position.
On or about March 8, 2013, a lawsuit, Anchorage v. Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation, et al.,
was filed in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage by the Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska against
our wholly owned subsidiary Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation (“ICRC”) and two former subcontractors
48
of ICRC. With respect to ICRC, the lawsuit asserts, among other things, breach of contract, professional negligence
and negligence in respect of work and services ICRC rendered under the Port of Anchorage Intermodal Expansion
Contract with the Maritime Administration, a federal agency with the United States Department of Transportation.
ICRC did not have a contract with the Municipality of Anchorage. In April 2013, ICRC removed the case to the United
States District Court for the District of Alaska. ICRC’s contract with the Maritime Administration expired on May
31, 2012. The litigation is expected to proceed to trial in early 2017. Currently, we cannot predict whether this litigation
will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
On or about August 21, 2015, a lawsuit, The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity
Company of Connecticut and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Integrated Concepts and Research
Corporation, VSE Corporation and Municipality of Anchorage, was filed against VSE and ICRC in the United States
District Court for the District of Alaska. The plaintiff insurance companies are seeking, among other things, (a) a
declaration by the court that there is no defense or indemnity coverage available to ICRC and VSE for the Anchorage
Lawsuit under the insurance policies issued by the plaintiffs and (b) reimbursement of defense fees and costs incurred
by the plaintiffs in the defense of uncovered claims in respect of the Anchorage Lawsuit.
On or about February 27, 2015, a lawsuit, Heritage Disposal and Storage v. VSE Corporation, was filed
against VSE in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. The litigation subsequently was
transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia on November 9, 2015. The lawsuit asserts, among other things, breach
of contract for services rendered related to the storage and manipulation of fireworks. The services relate to a prime
contract that VSE maintains with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The complaint
alleges that VSE has not paid Heritage the full charge for services rendered. Currently, we cannot predict whether
this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
In addition to the three above-referenced litigations, we have, in the normal course of business, certain claims
against us and against other parties and we may be subject to various governmental investigations. In our opinion, the
resolution of these litigations, claims and investigations will not have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations or financial position. However, the results of any legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
therefore, the amount of loss, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated.
(12) Business Segments and Customer Information
Segment Information
Management of our business operations is conducted under four reportable operating segments:
Supply Chain Management Group – Our Supply Chain Management Group supplies vehicle parts primarily through a
Managed Inventory Program (“MIP”) and direct sales to the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) and to other
customers.
Aviation Group - Our Aviation Group, formed in January 2015 when we completed the Aviation Acquisition, provides
MRO services, parts supply and distribution, and supply chain solutions for general aviation jet aircraft engines and
engine accessories.
Federal Services Group - Our Federal Services Group provides engineering, industrial, logistics, foreign military sales,
and legacy equipment sustainment services to the United States Department of Defense (“DoD”) and other government
agencies.
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group – Our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group provides technical and
consulting services primarily to various DoD and civilian government agencies.
These segments operate under separate management teams and financial information is produced for each
segment. The entities within the IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group reportable segment meet the
aggregation of operating segments criteria as defined by the accounting standard for segment reporting. We evaluate
segment performance based on consolidated revenues and operating income. Net sales of our business segments
exclude intersegment sales as these activities are eliminated in consolidation.
49
Our segment information is as follows (in thousands):
For the years ended December 31,
Revenues
Supply Chain Management Group
Aviation Group
Federal Services Group
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group
Total revenues
Operating income:
Supply Chain Management Group
Aviation Group
Federal Services Group
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group
Corporate
Operating income
Depreciation and amortization expense:
Supply Chain Management Group
Aviation Group
Federal Services Group
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group
Total depreciation and amortization
Capital expenditures:
Supply Chain Management Group
Aviation Group
Federal Services Group
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group
Corporate
Total capital expenditures
Total assets:
Supply Chain Management Group
Aviation Group
Federal Services Group
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group
Corporate
Total assets
2015
2014
2013
$196,772
119,729
166,973
50,508
$533,982
$ 35,453
10,635
2,071
4,731
(2,351)
$ 50,539
$ 7,074
5,865
10,635
1,967
$ 25,541
$ 7,544
959
78
16
1,965
$ 10,562
$172,482
-
190,761
60,828
$424,071
$ 29,694
-
3,452
6,634
(2,850)
$ 36,930
$ 5,373
-
11,320
2,077
$ 18,770
$ 2,524
-
230
199
461
$ 3,414
$154,702
-
242,343
74,593
$471,638
$ 27,299
-
9,469
9,061
(1,726)
$ 44,103
$ 4,265
-
13,356
2,387
$ 20,008
$ 895
-
1,447
71
2,003
$ 4,416
December 31,
2015
2014
$189,654
264,160
38,626
47,107
82,587
$622,134
$192,720
-
36,225
49,790
76,595
$355,330
Revenues are net of inter-segment eliminations. Corporate/unallocated expenses are primarily selling,
general and administrative expenses not allocated to segments. Corporate assets are primarily cash and property and
equipment.
Customer Information
Our revenues are derived from contract services performed for DoD agencies or federal civilian agencies and
from the delivery of products to our clients. The USPS, U.S. Army and Army Reserve, and U.S. Navy are our largest
customers. Our customers also include various other government agencies and commercial entities. Our revenue by
customer is as follows for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):
50
Customer
U. S. Postal Service
U.S. Army
U.S. Navy
U.S. Air Force
Total - DoD
Commercial Aviation
Other Commercial
Total - Commercial
Revenues by Customer
(dollars in thousands)
Years ended December 31,
%
34.6
2014
$167,268
15.0
18.5
0.7
34.2
101,714
88,007
3,323
193,044
%
39.4
24.0
20.7
0.8
45.5
2013
$142,203
101,736
123,307
3,625
228,668
2015
$184,876
80,086
98,887
3,558
182,531
119,729
4,653
124,382
22.4
0.9
23.3
-
3,680
3,680
-
0.9
0.9
-
2,250
2,250
Department of Energy
Social Security Administration
Department of Treasury
Other Government
Total - Other Civilian Agencies
16,020
9,666
1,405
15,102
42,193
3.0
1.8
0.3
2.8
7.9
19,000
10,153
10,897
20,029
60,079
4.5
2.4
2.6
4.7
14.2
20,124
12,981
35,929
29,483
98,517
%
30.1
21.6
26.1
0.8
48.5
-
0.5
0.5
4.3
2.8
7.6
6.2
20.9
Total
$533,982
100.0
$424,071
100.0
$471,638
100.0
We do not measure revenue or profit by product or service lines, either for internal management or external
financial reporting purposes, because it would be impractical to do so. Products offered and services performed are
determined by contract requirements and the types of products and services provided for one contract bear no relation
to similar products and services provided on another contract. Products and services provided vary when new contracts
begin or current contracts expire. In many cases, more than one product or service is provided under a contract or
contract task order. Accordingly, cost and revenue tracking is designed to best serve contract requirements and
segregating costs and revenues by product or service lines in situations for which it is not required would be difficult
and costly to both us and our customers.
(13) Capital Stock
Common Stock
Our common stock has a par value of $0.05 per share. Proceeds from common stock issuances that are
greater than $0.05 per share are credited to additional paid in capital. Holders of common stock are entitled to one
vote per common share held on all matters voted on by our stockholders. Stockholders of record are entitled to the
amount of dividends declared per common share held.
(14) 401(k) Plan and Profit Sharing Plan
We maintain a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, that covers substantially all of our employees. Under the provisions of our 401(k) plan, employees’ eligible
contributions are matched at rates specified in the plan documents. Our expense associated with this plan was
approximately $4.8 million, $4 million and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013,
respectively.
Energetics maintains a profit sharing plan for its employees. All employees who have completed at least two
years of service are members of the profit sharing plan. At our discretion, we may make contributions to the Energetics
plan. Total expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 was $0, $190 thousand, and $175
thousand, respectively.
51
(15) Fair Value Measurements
The accounting standard for fair value measurements defines fair value, and establishes a market-based
framework or hierarchy for measuring fair value. The standard is applicable whenever assets and liabilities are
measured at fair value.
The fair value hierarchy established in the standard prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into
three levels as follows:
Level 1 – Observable inputs – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
– includes quoted prices for similar instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets,
and amounts derived from valuation models where all significant inputs are observable in active markets; and
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs – includes amounts derived from valuation models where one or more
significant inputs are unobservable and require us to develop relevant assumptions.
The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
Amounts Recorded at Fair Value
Non-COLI assets held in Deferred
Supplemental Compensation Plan
Interest rate swaps
Earn-out obligations - current
Earn-out obligations - long-term
Financial Statement
Classification
Fair Value
Hierarchy
Fair Value
December 31,
2015
Fair Value
December 31,
2014
Other assets
Accrued expenses
Current portion of earn-
out obligations
Earn-out obligations
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 3
$264
$123
$9,678
$10,166
$253
-
$9,455
-
Changes in the fair value of the Non-COLI assets held in the deferred supplemental compensation plan are
recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses.
We account for our interest rate swap agreements under the provisions of ASC 815, and have determined
that our swap agreements qualify as highly effective hedges. Accordingly, the fair value of the swap agreements,
which is a liability of approximately $123 thousand at December 31, 2015, has been reported in accrued expenses.
We had no interest rate swaps in place at December 31, 2014. The offset, net of an income tax effect of approximately
$48 thousand is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying balance sheets as of
December 31, 2015. The amounts paid and received on the swap agreements are recorded in interest expense in the
period during which the related floating-rate interest is incurred. We determine the fair value of the swap agreements
based on a valuation model using market data inputs.
We utilized a probability-weighted discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of our Aviation
Acquisition earn-out obligations. Probabilities were applied to each potential pay-out scenario and the resulting values
were discounted using a rate that considered our weighted average cost of capital as well as a specific risk premium
associated with the riskiness of the earn out itself, the related projections, and the overall business. Significant
unobservable inputs used to value the contingent consideration include projected earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization and the discount rate. If significant increases or decreases in the inputs occurred in
isolation, the result could be a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.
Our acquisition of Wheeler Bros., Inc. (“WBI”) in 2011 required us to make additional payments to the sellers
of up to a total of $40 million over a four-year post-acquisition period that ended June 30, 2015 if WBI achieved
certain financial performance. WBI’s sellers earned approximately $10 million, $2.7 million, $219 thousand, and $7.1
million based on WBI’s financial performances for the earn-out years ended June 30, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012,
respectively. WBI’s final earn-out payment of approximately $10 million for the earn-out period ended June 30, 2015
was made in September 2015. Changes in the fair value of the earn-out obligations were recorded as contract costs in
the period of change through settlement.
52
The fair value of all earn-out obligations increased approximately $426 thousand and $3.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. (see Note 5, Acquisitions, for further discussion
of the Aviation Acquisition earn-out obligation).
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of the earn-out obligations
measured at fair value on a recurring basis that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Earn-out payments
Fair value adjustment included in earnings
Additional earn-out obligations
Balance as of December 31, 2015
(16) Discontinued Operations
Current portion
$9,455
(14,982)
527
14,678
$9,678
Long-term portion
$ -
-
(101)
10,267
$10,166
Total
$ 9,455
(14,982)
426
24,945
$19,844
During 2012 we discontinued the construction management operations of our wholly owned subsidiary
Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation (“ICRC”).
As of December 31, 2015, one of the bonded projects had not yet been completed and the aggregate bonded
amount on this project was approximately $3 million. Our bonded projects are the subject of claims and disputes
involving the subcontractors associated with the projects. We recorded an expense of approximately $1.1 million, net
of tax, which was included in loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily
related to these claims and disputes. We expect the remaining bonded project to be completed in 2016.
Revenues and costs of ICRC have been reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The
major categories included in discontinued operations on the consolidated statements of income are as follows (in
thousands):
Revenues
2015
Year ended December 31,
2014
$ -
$-
2013
$225
Loss before income taxes
Income benefit
Loss from discontinued operations, net
$-
$-
$(1,807)
(683)
$(1,124)
$(1,818)
(680)
$(1,138)
53
(17) Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
The following table shows selected quarterly data for 2015 and 2014, in thousands, except earnings per share.
Revenues
Contract costs
Operating income
Income from continuing operations
Net income
Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
Net income
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
Net income
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
Revenues
Contract costs
Operating income
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net income
Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net income
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net income
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
2015 Quarters
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
$120,791
$108,948
$10,684
$5,220
$5,220
$131,126
$118,672
$11,496
$5,479
$5,479
$137,396
$123,652
$13,243
$6,474
$6,474
$144,669
$128,883
$15,116
$7,745
$7,745
$0.97
$0.97
5,370
$0.97
$0.97
5,380
$1.02
$1.02
5,375
$1.02
$1.02
5,391
$1.20
$1.20
5,375
$1.20
$1.20
5,396
2014 Quarters
$1.44
$1.44
5,375
$1.43
$1.43
5,407
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
$107,962
$96,481
$10,703
$5,944
($279)
$5,665
$1.11
($0.05)
$1.06
5,356
$1.11
($0.05)
$1.06
5,368
$101,749
$93,388
$7,183
$3,887
($4)
$3,883
$0.73
$0.00
$0.73
5,356
$0.72
$0.00
$0.72
5,372
$94,951
$85,521
$7,687
$4,389
($226)
$4,163
$0.82
($0.04)
$0.78
5,356
$0.82
($0.04)
$0.78
5,380
$119,409
$107,611
$11,357
$6,269
($615)
$5,654
$1.17
($0.12)
$1.05
5,347
$1.17
($0.12)
$1.05
5,364
54
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted
an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 based on
the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on our assessment under the framework in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as
of December 31, 2015. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion
on our internal control over financial reporting. This opinion appears in the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm under Item 9(a) of this Form 10-K.
On January 28, 2015, we acquired four related businesses that specialize in maintenance, repair and overhaul
services and parts supply for general aviation jet aircraft related engines and engine accessories. The businesses
acquired include Air Parts & Supply Co., Kansas Aviation of Independence, L.L.C., Prime Turbines LLC (including
both U.S. and German-based operations), and CT Aerospace LLC. These four businesses are operating as a combined
group managed by our wholly owned subsidiary VSE Aviation, Inc. (“VAI”). VAI represents approximately 13.7%
of total assets as of December 31, 2015, and 22.4% and 20.7% of revenues and operating income, respectively, for the
year then ended. As is consistent with interpretive guidance provided by the SEC’s staff, management excluded the
acquired businesses from its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2015.
Change in Internal Controls
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, there were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that
have materially affected these controls, or are reasonably likely to materially affect these controls subsequent to the
evaluation of these controls.
55
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of VSE Corporation
We have audited VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). VSE Corporation
and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,
management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not
include the internal controls of VSE Aviation, Inc., which is included in the 2015 consolidated financial statements
of VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries and constituted approximately 13.7% of total assets as of December 31, 2015
and approximately 22.4% and 20.7% of revenues and operating income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our
audit of internal control over financial reporting of VSE Corporation and subsidiaries also did not include an
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of VSE Aviation, Inc.
In our opinion, VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated balance sheets of VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 of VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries and our report
dated March 3, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 3, 2016ITEM 9B. Other Information
56
None.
PART III
Except as otherwise indicated below, the information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of
Form 10-K has been omitted in reliance of General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by
reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after December 31, 2015
in respect to the Annual Meeting of VSE’s stockholders scheduled to be held on May 3, 2016 (the “Proxy Statement”).
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
See Item 4 under the caption “Executive Officers of Registrant,” and the remaining information required by
this Item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Except for the “Equity Compensation Plan Information” disclosed in Item 5(e) above, the information
required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
1. Financial Statements
PART IV
The consolidated financial statements are listed under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
2. Supplemental Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or the information has been
otherwise supplied in the financial statements or notes to the financial statements.
3. Exhibits
See “Exhibit Index” hereinafter contained and incorporated by reference.
57
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Date: March 3, 2016
By:
VSE CORPORATION
/s/ M. A. Gauthier
M. A. Gauthier
Director, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Operating
Officer
58
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the
following persons on behalf of Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
Title
Date
/s/ Maurice A. Gauthier
Maurice A. Gauthier
/s/ Thomas R. Loftus
Thomas R. Loftus
/s/ Clifford M. Kendall
Clifford M. Kendall
/s/ Calvin S. Koonce
Calvin S. Koonce
/s/ James F. Lafond
James F. Lafond
/s/ Bonnie K. Wachtel
Bonnie K. Wachtel
/s/ Ralph E. Eberhart
Ralph E. Eberhart
/s/ Jack C. Stultz
Jack C. Stultz
/s/ John E. Potter
John E. Potter
/s/ John C. Harvey
John C. Harvey
Director, Chief Executive
Officer, President and
Chief Operating Officer
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
Chairman/Director
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
March 3, 2016
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
59
Reference No.
Per Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
EXHIBIT INDEX
Description of Exhibit
Exhibit No.
In this Form 10-K
3.1
3.2
4.1
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
Certificate of incorporation and by-laws
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of VSE
Corporation dated as of February 6, 1996 (Exhibit
3.2 to Form 10-K405 dated March 25, 1996)
By-Laws of VSE Corporation as amended through
December 17, 2008 (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K dated
December 17, 2008)
Instruments defining the rights of security holders,
including indentures
Specimen Stock Certificate as of May 19, 1983
(Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement No. 2-83255
dated April 22, 1983 on Form S-2)
Material contracts
Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2004,
by and between VSE Corporation and Thomas R.
Loftus (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q dated July 30,
2004)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
dated as of December 6, 2013, by and between VSE
Corporation and Maurice A. Gauthier (Form 8-K dated
December 9, 2013)
Severance and Mutual Protection Agreement
dated as of November 7, 2008, by and between
VSE Corporation and Thomas M. Kiernan
(Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-K dated March 3,
2009)
Third Amended and Restated Business Loan and
Security Agreement dated January 28, 2015 among
VSE Corporation and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania and
a syndicate of five other banks (Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K dated January 30, 2015)
Lease Agreement by and between Metropark 7 LLC and
VSE Corporation (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
dated November 4, 2009)
VSE Corporation Deferred Supplemental Compensation
Plan effective January 1, 1994 as amended by the
Board through March 9, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q dated April 28, 2004)
*
*
* +
* +
* +
* +
* +
* +
60
10.8
13.1
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
99.1
101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.DEF
101.LAB
101.PRE
VSE Corporation 2004 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Plan (Appendix B to Registrant’s definitive
proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders held on May 6, 2014)
Annual report to security holders, Form 10-Q
or selected quarterly data
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm
Section 302 CEO Certification
Section 302 CFO and PAO Certification
Section 906 CEO Certification
Section 906 CFO and PAO Certification
Audit Committee Charter (as adopted by the Board
Of Directors of VSE Corporation on March 9,
2004)(Appendix A to Registrant’s definitive
proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders held on May 3, 2004)
XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
* +
Exhibit 13
Exhibit 21
Exhibit 23.1
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2
*
*Document has been filed as indicated and is incorporated by reference herein.
+Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
61
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
The following is a listing of the subsidiaries of the Registrant:
Exhibit 21
Energetics Incorporated
G&B Solutions, Inc.
Jurisdiction Organization
Maryland
Virginia
Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation
District of Columbia
Akimeka, LLC
Wheeler Bros., Inc.
VSE Aviation, Inc.
Air Parts & Supply Co.
Kansas Aviation of Independence, L.L.C.
Prime Turbines LLC
CT Aerospace LLC
Hawaii
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Florida
Kansas
Delaware
Texas
62
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 23.1
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of VSE Corporation and
Subsidiaries:
• Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-195802) pertaining to the 2004 Non-employee Directors Stock
Plan, as amended;
• Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-195803) pertaining to the 2006 Restricted Stock Plan, as
amended; and
• Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-134285) pertaining to the 2006 Restricted Stock Plan, as
amended
of our reports dated March 3, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of VSE Corporation and
Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of VSE Corporation and Subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2015.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 3, 2016
63
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 31.1
I, M. A. Gauthier, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of VSE Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
64
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 3, 2016
/s/ M. A. Gauthier
M. A. Gauthier
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Operating Officer
65
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 31.2
I, T. R. Loftus, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of VSE Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
66
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 3, 2016
/s/ T. R. Loftus
T. R. Loftus
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
67
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.1
Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
VSE Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge:
1) our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2) the information contained in our Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 3, 2016
/s/ M. A. Gauthier
M. A. Gauthier
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Operating Officer
68
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.2
Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VSE
Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge:
1) our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2) the information contained in our Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 3, 2016
/s/ T. R. Loftus
T. R. Loftus
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
69