Webis Holdings plc Global Gaming Group Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 May 2022 AIM Stock Code: WEB Webis Holdings plc Contents Our Performance 2 3 6 Group at a Glance Chairman’s Statement Group Gaming Licences Our Governance 7 8 10 14 15 16 The Board of Directors Directors’ Report Corporate Governance Statement Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee Report Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities Report of the Remuneration Committee Our Financials 18 24 25 26 27 28 Independent Auditor’s Report Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income Statements of Financial Position Statements of Changes in Equity Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Notes to the Financial Statements Shareholder Information 53 56 Notice of Meeting and Proxy Form Company Information 1 Webis Holdings plc Group at a Glance Webis Holdings plc (the “Company”) and its subsidiary companies (together the “Group”) operates two primary segments: - WatchandWager.com Ltd and WatchandWager.com LLC – Advanced Deposit Wagering (“ADW”) WatchandWager.com LLC – Cal Expo Harness Racetrack WatchandWager.com Ltd is regulated in the Isle of Man and operates a totalisator wagering hub through its United States Tote supplier, which enables it to conduct its ADW business by passing wagers directly into global racetrack betting pools in real time. WatchandWager.com LLC has its operational base in Lexington, Kentucky, with its head office in Larkspur, California, and provides pari-mutuel wagering, or pool- betting, services through a number of distribution channels to a global client base. The company holds United States pari- mutuel licences for its ADW business in the USA, including a multi-jurisdictional licence issued by the States of North Dakota, and individual licences for the States of California, Maryland, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, Washington, West Virginia and Kentucky. The business provides wagering opportunities predominantly on horse and greyhound racing and has contracted with a significant number of prestigious racetrack partners within the United States, Hong Kong, France, Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia amongst others. It provides wagering facilities interactive website, through watchandwager.com, as well as offering a business-to- business wagering product. to customers its WatchandWager.com LLC also operates Cal Expo Harness Racetrack in Sacramento, California, under a licence issued by the California Horse Racing Board. This ‘bricks and mortar’ presence in the largest State economy in the USA continues to provide leverage for our related global pari- mutuel operations. As part of the requirements for the Isle of Man licence, client funds for the Isle of Man licensed companies are held in fully protected segregated client accounts within an Isle of Man regulated bank. 2 Webis Holdings plc Chairman’s Statement Introduction The Board is satisfied with the progress of the business over the year reported. It has been difficult to make comparisons with prior years with the impact of Covid-19 lock downs impacting business in various ways for at least the last two years. The positive factors have been our continued growth in our B2C sector and our continued good performance at our racetrack, Cal Expo in Sacramento. Against that we have seen a decline in our B2B business, which we see as a mature business model. On a macro level, we are pleased with a continued licensed presence across the USA and, of course, our existing business in California. Shareholders will have noted the “no” votes on sports betting in California. The bills were badly constructed on many levels, and as a result now leave us even better positioned in the State. Sports wagering will happen in California - the State finance deficit dictates so - and with our long-term lease at Cal Expo, we are very much part of the process. I am also pleased to report that the Board has agreed a clear business strategy for a minimum of the next two years. This is largely based upon generating significant growth for our B2C sector, which we consider an asset, in conjunction with our increasing licensed presence within the USA. We consider that focusing on these two areas of growth will maximise value for shareholders. In summary, we know that we need to improve our day-to- day performance (as commented on below) and are confident that we can achieve that. Finally, I can report we continue to have the full support of our principal shareholder to drive the growth strategy forwards in the USA. Year End Results Review The Group amounts wagered for the year ended 31 May 2022 were US$ 120.1 million (2021: US$ 132.1 million). Gross Profit reported was US $ 5.1 million (2021: US$ 5.8 million). Operating costs were up on last year at US$ 5.6 million (2021 US$ 5.3 million), primarily from increased race days at the Cal Expo racetrack, whilst we also managed the business effectively during the Covid-19 pandemic. This resulted in a loss on the year of US$ 0.374 million, a downturn on the 2021 profit of US$ 0.824 million, albeit last year was an exceptional year. Shareholder equity stands at US$ 1.3 million (2021: US$ 1.7 million). Total cash stands at US$ 4.1 million (2021: US$ 5.1 million), which includes ring-fenced funds held as protection against our player liability as required under USA and Isle of Man gambling legislation. Approach to Risk and Corporate Governance As part of the adoption of the Quoted Companies Alliance Corporate Governance code in 2018, the Board completed an assessment of the risks inherent in the business and defined and adopted a statement of risk appetite, being the amount and type of risk, it is prepared to seek, accept or tolerate in pursuit of value. This being: - “The Group’s general risk appetite is a moderate, balanced one that allows it to maintain appropriate growth, profitability and scalability, whilst ensuring full regulatory compliance.” The Group’s primary risk drivers include: - Strategic Reputational Credit Operational Market Liquidity, Capital and Funding Regulatory and Compliance Conduct Our risk appetite is classified under an “impact” matrix defined as Zero, Low, Medium and High. Appropriate steps are implemented to ensure the prudential control monitoring of risks to the Group and the Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee oversees this essential requirement. Further details of the Corporate Governance Statement will be found on pages 10 to 13 of this report and should be read in conjunction with my report. The Board refined incorporates the risk and compliance framework. the Group’s business plan which Performance by Sector WatchandWager Business-to-Consumer www.watchandwager.com/mobile We have been encouraged by the performance of the B2C business over the period reported. This continues the positive momentum that we enjoyed in the previous financial year. Comparisons are very difficult to make against prior years due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. As previously reported, this sector performed well last year during a scenario where live racing continued across the world but, in many circumstances, customers were not permitted to visit the tracks. This year, thankfully, saw a gradual relaxation of the policies around the pandemic, which was most welcome for the industry as a whole, but also made trading more competitive. Given these points, we have analysed our key metrics versus pre-pandemic levels, and we have shown significant growth on the website/mobile. Most importantly, overall handle (amounts wagered) in the period reported from players on our interactive platforms has increased by 40% versus the FY ending in May 2019, and 66% versus the FY ending in May 2018. FY 2020/21 was to an extent a freak year, for the reasons above, and we saw a small drop off in handle against last year. This is not wholly surprising looking at the market overall, but it is vital we keep this positive momentum going. 3 Webis Holdings plc Chairman’s Statement continued Business-to-Consumer continued We consider our growing B2C business as one of our principal assets of the company. To that end, our executive team is currently conducting a detailed strategic review of this sector, with a view to further invest in software development, marketing and related resource to grow this area even faster. This is commented upon further in Subsequent Events. Business-to-Business This sector covers the provision of pari-mutuel (pool) wagering to high-roller clients, many of whom specialise in algorithmic, or computer assisted trading, on a wide range of global racetracks. Conversely, we consider this model to be a mature business, albeit one that is still important to the overall Group. Over the period reported, we saw a decline in handle and in addition some issues with our key customers’ ability to return a positive investment on their wagers. This is, of course, fundamental to the pari-mutuel business model of churn that we operate. There is no easy solution to this issue. The fact is that the sector is overly competitive with our main host global racetracks continuing to request a greater margin from this type of betting. At the same time, the key high roller clients are also requesting preferential rates based upon their volumes. Obviously, this squeezes an operator such as ourselves. Cal Expo We raced between October 2021 and May 2022 during the period with 45 nights of live racing. Overall, we were pleased with our performance and this sector continues to show a consistent level of profitability. The reason for this is we have achieved unique positioning on the West Coast with our product. We had good horse level numbers throughout the season, competitive betting action and good levels of exposure from the TV channels. This is a recipe for strong levels of handle throughout the season. In addition, we continue to benefit from the “dark monies”, namely revenues accrued whilst we were not racing. As a reminder to shareholders, we have secured the lease at the property until 2030. We still consider Cal Expo to be a key asset as we grow our presence in California. Key risk factors During the period we have updated our Risk Assessment procedures and will continue to do so. The Board conducts regular risk assessments on a micro and macro level. Licences, Regulatory and Compliance I am pleased to report that during the period we renewed all our key licences, and in addition we fully expect all our licenses subsequent to the period to be approved before the calendar year end 2022. In addition, I can report that the Group did not have any regulatory breaches or complaints from our regulators and our content providers during the period, and indeed to date. There were also no AML issues reported to the regulatory authorities during the period. There were also no Health and Safety issues over the period. We consider compliance and social responsibility to be important to the brand and company. Subsequent Events (post period reported) Trading I am pleased to report that we had a good first quarter of the new financial year, June-August was overall strong, where we continued to show good levels of growth in our B2C sector and also in revenues from Cal Expo. Against that, B2B business continued to be stagnant. It should be noted, however, that as anticipated we saw a slowing in business through September and October, mainly due to reduced quality of USA content. This is normal seasonality, however there is no doubt that USA and global economic factors are becoming a threat to the business and industry generally. License Renewals As reported, we have renewed or are in the process of renewing all our key licenses in both the Isle of Man and the USA. Significantly, we extended our Webis license with the Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission in August of this year. Whilst of course the US is the key generator of business, we do consider our continued presence in the Isle of Man as strategically important. In the USA, as well as our Cal Expo license, and as previously reported, we renewed our online license with the California Horseracing Board on 22 November. This is a vitally important license for reasons given below. Arizona Downs Shareholders should be updated on this project. We have signed a lease agreement with the landlord at the venue in Prescott Valley, AZ. However, at time of writing we still have not had our license hearing with the State regulators. This has been frustrating, but we fully expect to be licensed by the end of this year, or at worst early in 2023. Based upon that, we would immediately commence operations as a licensee, and plan to commence actual live racing in September and October 2023. We still believe that this project will be profitable and will assist our other live operations at Cal Expo. We will keep shareholders fully informed of progress on this matter. 4 Webis Holdings plc Chairman’s Statement continued USA/CA regulated sports betting As shareholders are aware, on Tuesday 8 November the two Californian Sports Betting Propositions failed to receive the number of votes required for them to go into law. Contrary to some opinions, this was actually a very positive development for both for our Californian business. The comments propositions were seen thought-out, highly protective, and in the case of 27, potentially misleading. Initial indications since the elections show that this subject is far from dead in California. Simply put, the market for Californian sports betting is too big for it not to happen. to be ill We much prefer working closely with the State legislature in Sacramento to devise a State-driven Bill that is fair and equitable for all interested parties and, most importantly, the Californian customer. We believe that this can happen in 2023 with a view for live operations in 2024 and will work to ensure that our assets in California will be included in such a Bill. Strategic Outlook We have now completed a comprehensive strategic review of our operations and goals for the business through the next two years, all linked to achieving profitability. We have identified growing the B2C sector as our principal aim with a view to at least doubling player numbers within the next two years. We have developed a detailed software and marketing plan to that end which has been approved by the Board with detailed budgets until the end of 2024 which project this sector and indeed the whole operation to be profitable. In conjunction with that, we have several aims to improve our licensed position in the USA, especially in CA and AZ. We believe that it is vitally important for growth that we continue to ensure the highest levels of regulatory compliance as a company in the USA. A combination of growth in our core business as detailed above plus our unique presence in key States will greatly enhance the valuation of the business. Related to that, we continue to assess more strategic developments and have not ruled out alliances, mergers or acquisitions to fast-track our growth. We will keep shareholders fully up to date on developments in this area. Summary Finally, I would like to thank all our shareholders and customers for their continued loyalty. In addition, I would like to thank all our staff and team for their work and commitment over the year. Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman 28 November 2022 5 Webis Holdings plc Group Gaming Licences Webis Holdings plc Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission WatchandWager.com Ltd Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission WatchandWager.com LLC - Advanced Deposit Wagering Multi-jurisdictional California Horse Racing Board North Dakota Racing Commission State by State California Horse Racing Board Colorado Division of Racing Events Kentucky Horse Racing Commission The Maryland Jockey Club Minnesota Racing Commission New York State Gaming Commission North Dakota Racing Commission Washington Horse Racing Commission West Virginia Racing Commission WatchandWager.com LLC - Cal Expo Harness Racing California Horse Racing Board 6 Webis Holdings plc The Board of Directors Denham Eke, aged 71 Non-executive Chairman career Denham Eke began his in stockbroking before moving into corporate planning for a major UK insurance broker. He is a Director of many years’ standing of both public and private companies involved in the mining, leisure, manufacturing and financial services sectors. Denham Eke was appointed Non-executive Chairman in April 2003. Ed Comins, aged 53 Managing Director the Tote Ed Comins has 30+ years’ experience in the betting and gaming industry with Coral, Ladbroke Casinos, and GameAccount. At the Tote he had overall responsibility for developing Totepool’s pari- mutuel business as General Manager of Tote Direct and Development Director for Totepool. He was Commercial Director for GameAccount, a provider of online skill games, where he managed betting partner relationships with key sportsbooks. Ed Comins joined the Board in May 2010. Richard Roberts, aged 58 Non-executive Director Richard Roberts has served in executive and board positions over the past 25 years in the online gaming and betting industries, leading US digital operations in iGaming, ADW and In his current fantasy sports markets. position, he Gaming Entertainment. is the President of Digital and for Mohegan Gaming Richard Roberts joined the Board in April 2021. Sir James Mellon, aged 93 Non-executive Director Sir James Mellon is a former British diplomat whose final post was a Director-General for Trade and Investment, United States and Consul-General, New York. He has many years of corporate experience having been a chairman or director of numerous public and private companies. Sir James Mellon January 2012. joined the Board in Katie Errock, aged 35 Non-executive Director in experience Ms Errock, currently Company Secretary for the Group and its subsidiary companies, has extensive compliance, regulation and corporate governance. She is an associate of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment and is President of the Isle of Man chapter. Ms Errock is also the Company Secretary for a number of other companies controlled by Burnbrae Group Limited, an entity wholly owned by Webis’ principal shareholder, Jim Mellon. Katie Errock joined the Board in August 2022. 7 Webis Holdings plc Directors’ Report The Directors present their annual report and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 May 2022. Principal activities The Group operates: • • a pari-mutuel service to individual and business customers; and a racetrack under a licence issued in California, USA. Business review The Group operates on a worldwide basis and provides online and offline facilities in respect of a wide variety of pari- mutuel events. A more detailed review of the business, its results and future developments is in the Chairman’s Statement on pages 3 to 5. Proposed dividend The Directors do not propose the payment of a dividend (2021: US$Nil). Policy and practice on payment of creditors It is the policy of the Group to agree appropriate terms and conditions for its transactions with suppliers by means of standard written terms to individually negotiated contracts. Directors’ interests Denham Eke 1 Ed Comins Richard Roberts Sir James Mellon The Group seeks to ensure that payments are always made in accordance with these terms and conditions. At the year-end there were 23 days (2021: 31 days) of purchases in trade creditors. Financial risks Details relating to financial risk management are shown in note 21 to the financial statements. Directors and Directors’ interests The Directors who held office during the year and to date were as follows: Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman Ed Comins Managing Director Sir James Mellon Non-executive Director Richard Roberts Non-executive Director Katie Errock Non-executive Director (appointed 9 August 2022) The Directors who held office at the end of the year had the following interests in the ordinary shares of the Company and options to purchase such shares arising from incentive schemes: Ordinary shares Options Interest at end of year 2022 Interest at start of year 2021 Interest at end of year 2022 Interest at start of year 2021 — — — — — — — — — — 14,000,000 14,000,000 — — — — 1 Denham Eke is Managing Director of Burnbrae Limited which holds 248,204,442 ordinary shares representing 63.10% of the issued capital of the Company. Further details of the options issued to the executive Directors are contained in the Report of the Remuneration Committee on pages 16 and 17. 8 Webis Holdings plc Directors’ Report continued Substantial interests On 27 September 2022, the following interests in 3% or more of the Company’s ordinary share capital had been reported: Burnbrae Limited Annual General Meeting Shareholders will be asked to approve at the Annual General Meeting certain resolutions as special business. Some of these resolutions have become routine business at the Annual General Meetings of most public companies, including your Company, and relate to the renewal of the authority for the Directors to allot relevant securities and the renewal of the powers for the Directors to allot equity securities for cash. Employees The Group is committed to a policy of equal opportunity in matters training and career development of employees, and is opposed to any form of less favourable treatment afforded on the grounds of disability, sex, race or religion. to employment, relating Number of ordinary shares % 63.10 248,204,442 Political and charitable contributions The Group made no political contributions during the year. As part of the obligations of the pari-mutuel business in the United States, the Group made charitable contributions of US$37,892 during the year (2021: US$49,884). Auditors KPMG Audit LLC, being eligible, have expressed their willingness to continue in office in accordance with Section 12(2) of the Isle of Man Companies Act 1982. On behalf of the Board recognises The Group importance of ensuring the employees are kept informed of the Group’s performance, activities and future plans. Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman 28 November 2022 9 Webis Holdings plc Corporate Governance Statement Corporate Governance Report The Board of Webis Holdings plc (the “Board”) is committed to best practice in corporate governance throughout Webis Holdings plc and all subsidiary companies (together the “Group”). The Directors have agreed to comply with the provisions of the Quoted Companies Alliance (“QCA”) Corporate Governance Code for Small and Mid-Size Quoted Companies (2018) to the extent which is appropriate to its nature and scale of operations. This report illustrates how the Group complies with those principles. QCA Principle 1: Establish a strategy and business model which promotes long-term value for shareholders The strategy and business operations of the Group are set out in the Chairman’s Statement on pages 3 to 5. The Group’s strategy and business model and amendments thereto, are developed by the Managing Director and his senior management team and approved by the Board. The management is responsible for implementing the strategy and managing the business at an operational level. the Managing Director, led by team, The Group’s overall strategic objective is to develop a profitable, sustainable advance deposit wagering (“ADW”) platform that benefits from a wide and diverse client base, both business and retail. The Group operates through two principal operating subsidiaries: WatchandWager.com Ltd and WatchandWager.com LLC. WatchandWager.com Ltd is regulated in the Isle of Man and operates a totalisator wagering hub through its United States Tote supplier, which enables it to conduct its ADW business by passing wagers directly into global racetrack betting pools in real time. its operational base WatchandWager.com LLC has in Lexington, Kentucky, with its head office in Larkspur, California, and provides pari-mutuel, or pool-betting, wagering services through a number of distribution channels to a global client base. The company holds United States pari-mutuel licences for its ADW business in the US, issued by North Dakota, California, Kentucky, Minnesota, New York, West Virginia, Washington, Maryland and Colorado. The business provides wagering opportunities predominantly on horse and greyhound racing and has contracted with a significant number of prestigious racetrack partners within the United States, Hong Kong, France, Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia amongst others. It provides wagering its website, watchandwager.com, as well as offering a business-to- business wagering product. to customers facilities through WatchandWager.com LLC also operates Cal Expo Harness Racetrack in Sacramento, California, under a licence issued by the California Horse Racing Board. This ‘bricks and mortar’ presence in the largest State economy in the US continues to provide leverage for our related global pari- mutuel operations. The Group also plans to develop a licensed US-based sportsbook offering following the US Supreme Court ruling which paved the way to legalizing wagering on sports in the United States, subject to individual State legislation. This will probably be developed in partnership with one or more major operators and suppliers in the sector. The Group considers this market to be a significant growth area for our US operations. Significantly, there are a number of California draft Sports Betting Bills being currently debated, which specify that only existing land-based operators in the State will be eligible for license applications, in our case through the Cal Expo, Sacramento, CA racetrack facility. In the United States, WatchandWager.com LLC holds ADW licenses not only for California, but also for North Dakota (providing regulated access to a total of 26 states), together with the previously mentioned individual State licenses. The Group operates in an inherently high risk and heavily regulated sector, and this is reflected in the principal risks and uncertainties. In executing the Group’s strategy and operational plans, management will typically confront a range of day-to-day challenges associated with these key risks and uncertainties and will seek to deploy the identified mitigation steps to manage these risks as they manifest themselves. QCA Principle 2: Seek shareholder needs and expectations to understand and meet The Group via the Managing Director seeks to maintain a regular dialogue with both existing and potential new shareholders in order to communicate the Group’s strategy and progress and to understand the needs and expectations of shareholders. Beyond the Annual General Meeting, the Managing Director and, where appropriate, other members of the senior management team or Board will meet with investors and analysts to provide them with updates on the Group’s business and to obtain feedback regarding the market’s expectations of the Group. The Group’s investor relations activities encompass dialogue with both institutional and private investors. From time to time, the Company attends private investor events, providing an opportunity to meet with representatives from the Group in a more informal setting. investors those for QCA Principle 3: Take into account wider stakeholder and social responsibilities and their implications for long-term success The Group is aware of its corporate social responsibilities and the need to maintain effective working relationships across a range of stakeholder groups. These include the Group’s employees, clients, partners, suppliers, regulatory authorities and horseracing colleagues involved in the Group’s track facility at Cal Expo. The Group’s operations and working methodologies take account of the need to balance the needs of all of these stakeholder groups while maintaining focus on the Board’s primary responsibility to promote the success of the Group for the benefit of its members as a whole. The Group endeavours to take account of feedback received from stakeholders, making amendments to working arrangements and operational plans where appropriate and where such amendments are consistent with the Group’s longer-term strategy. The Group takes due account of any impact that its activities may have on the environment and seeks to minimise this impact wherever possible. Through the various procedures and systems, it operates, the Group ensures full compliance with health and safety and environmental legislation relevant to its activities. 10 Webis Holdings plc Corporate Governance Statement continued QCA Principle 4: Embed effective risk management, considering both opportunities and threats, throughout the organisation is for responsible the systems of The Board risk management and internal control and for reviewing their effectiveness. The internal controls are designed to manage rather than eliminate risk and provide reasonable but not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. Through the Group Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee, the effectiveness of these internal controls is reviewed annually. the activities of A comprehensive budgeting process is completed once a year and is reviewed and approved by the Board. The Group’s results, compared with the budget, are reported to the Board on a monthly basis. The Group maintains appropriate insurance cover in respect of actions taken against the Directors because of their roles, as well as against material loss or claims against the Group. The insured values and type of cover are comprehensively reviewed on a periodic basis. The senior management team meets at least monthly to consider new risks and opportunities presented to the Group, making recommendations to the Board and/or Group Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee as appropriate. QCA Principle 5: Maintain functioning, balanced team led by the chair the board as a well- The Group’s Board currently comprises four Non-executive Directors and one Executive Director. All of the Directors are subject to election by shareholders at the first Annual General Meeting after their appointment to the Board and will continue to seek re-election at least once every three years. The Board is responsible to the shareholders for the proper management of the Group and meets at least four times a year to set the overall direction and strategy of the Group, to review operational and financial performance and to advise on management appointments. All key operational decisions are subject to Board approval. to their connection Non-executive Directors, Sir James Mellon and Richard Roberts, are considered to be independent. The other Non- executive Directors are not considered to be independent given the Company’s controlling shareholder. The QCA Code suggests that a board should have at least two independent Non-executive Directors. The Board considers that the current composition and structure of the Board of Directors have been appropriate to maintain effective oversight of to date. However, the Board is aware that further oversight through independent Non-executive Directors could be beneficial to the governance environment. This process is under review further development of business and opportunities in the US in order to be able to determine the exact need and requirements. the Group’s activities is pending the Non-executive Directors receive their fees in the form of a basic cash emolument. The Executive Director receives a basic cash salary and also holds options over the Group’s shares. The number and terms are set out on pages 16 and 17. the The option grant concerned is not deemed to be significant individual Executive Director. The current for remuneration structure for the Board’s Executive and Non- executive Directors is deemed to be proportionate. QCA Principle 6: Ensure that between them the Directors have the necessary up-to-date experience, skills and capabilities The Board considers that all of the Executive and Non- executive Directors are of sufficient competence and calibre to add strength and objectivity to its activities and bring considerable experience in the operational and financial development of gambling and horseracing companies. The Directors’ biographies are set out on page 7. The Board regularly reviews the composition of the Board to ensure that it has the necessary breadth and depth of skills to support the ongoing development of the Group. Whilst there is no Finance Director on the Board, the overview of the finance function is the responsibility of a non-Board Financial Controller. The Chairman, in conjunction with the Company Secretary, ensures that the Directors’ knowledge is kept up to date on key issues and developments pertaining to the Group, its operational environment and to the Directors’ responsibilities as members of the Board. During the course of the year, Directors received updates from the Company Secretary and various external advisers on a number of corporate governance matters. Directors’ service contracts or appointment letters make provision in furtherance of his or her duties and responsibilities, normally via the Company Secretary. to seek personal advice for a Director QCA Principle 7: Evaluate board performance based on clear and relevant objectives, seeking continuous improvement Internal evaluation of the Board, the Committees and individual Directors is undertaken on an annual basis in the form of peer appraisal and discussions to determine their effectiveness and performance as well as the Directors' continued independence. The results and recommendations that come out of the appraisals for the Directors shall identify the key corporate and financial targets that are relevant to each Director and their personal targets in terms of career development and training. Progress against previous targets is also assessed where relevant. The Board may utilise the results of the evaluation process when considering the adequacy of the composition of the Board and for succession planning. 11 Webis Holdings plc Corporate Governance Statement continued QCA Principle 8: Promote a corporate culture that is based on ethical values and behaviours The Board seeks to maintain the highest standards of integrity and probity in the conduct of the Group’s operations. These values are enshrined in the written policies and working practices adopted by all employees in the Group. An open culture is encouraged within the Group, with regular communications to staff regarding progress and staff feedback regularly sought. The Executive Management regularly monitors the Group’s cultural environment and seeks to address any concerns that may arise, escalating these to Board level as necessary. The Group is committed to providing a safe environment for its staff and all other parties for which the Group has a legal or moral responsibility in this area. The Group’s health and safety policies and procedures are enshrined in the Group’s documented quality systems, which encompass all aspects of the Group’s day-to-day operations. QCA Principle 9: Maintain governance structures and processes that are fit for purpose and support good decision- making by the board framework which enables risk The Role of the Board The Board is collectively responsible for the long-term success of the organisation. Its principal function is to determine the strategy and policies of the Group within an effective control to be assessed and managed. The Board ensures that the necessary financial and human resources are in place for the Group to meet its objectives and that business and management performances are reviewed. Furthermore, the Board ensures that the Group operates within its constitution, relevant legislation and regulation and that proper accounting records and effective systems of business control are established, maintained, documented and audited. There are at least four formal Board meetings each year. All Board members have the benefit, at the Group’s expense, of liability insurance in respect of their responsibilities as Directors and have access to independent legal or other professional advice if required. The Board has a formal schedule of matters which are reserved for its consideration and it has established three committees to consider specific issues in greater detail, being the Group Audit, Risk and Compliance, Remuneration and Nomination Committees. The Terms of Reference for each of these Committees are published on the Group’s website. The Chairman The Chairman is responsible for leading the Board, ensuring its effectiveness in all aspects of its role, promoting a culture of openness of debate and communicating with the Group’s members on behalf of the Board. The Chairman sets the direction of the Board and promotes a culture of openness and debate by facilitating the effective contribution of Non- executive Directors and ensuring constructive relations between Executive and Non-executive Directors. The Chairman also ensures that Directors receive accurate, timely and clear information. In doing so, this fosters a positive corporate governance culture throughout the Group. The Managing Director The Managing Director is responsible for managing the Group’s business and operations within the parameters set by the Board. the business. Their key Non-executive Directors The Non-executive Directors are responsible for bringing independent judgement to the discussions held by the Board, using their breadth of experience and understanding of to constructively challenge and contribute to strategic proposals, and to monitor performance, resources, and standards of conduct, compliance and control, whilst providing support to executive management in developing the Group. responsibilities are The Board has established a Group Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee “Committee”), a Remuneration Committee and a Nominations Committee with formally delegated duties and responsibilities. Sir James Mellon chairs both the Remuneration the ARCC and Committee. (“ARCC” or Group Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee The ARCC meets at least two times each year and comprises two Non-executive Directors, currently Sir James Mellon (Chairman) and Denham Eke. The external auditors attend by invitation. Its role is to be responsible for reviewing the integrity of the financial statements and the balance of information disclosed in the accompanying Directors’ Report, to review the effectiveness of internal controls and risk management systems and recommend to the Board (for approval by re- appointment of the external auditor. The ARCC reviews and monitors the external auditor’s objectivity, competence, effectiveness and independence, ensuring that if it or its associates are invited to undertake non-audit work it will not compromise auditor objectivity and independence. Further information can be found within the Group Audit, Risk and Compliance Report contained within this Annual Report. the appointment or the members) Remuneration Committee The Remuneration Committee meets at least twice a year and comprises two Non-executive Directors. It is chaired by Sir James Mellon and is responsible for determining the the Company remuneration of the management. Secretary and other members of Committee members do not in discussions concerning their own remuneration. the Executive Director, take part Further information can be found within the Remuneration Report contained within this Annual Report. Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee is comprised of the whole Board. It is chaired by the Chairman of the Board and is responsible for making recommendations to the Board on matters relating to the composition of the Board, including Executive and Non-executive Director succession planning, the appointment of new Directors and the election and re- election of Directors. The Nomination Committee only meets as matters arise. 12 Webis Holdings plc Corporate Governance Statement continued the assessment of Appointments to the Board The principal purpose of the Nomination Committee is to the balance of skills, undertake experience, independence and knowledge on the Board against the requirements of the business, with a view to determining whether any shortages exist. Having completed the assessment, the Committee makes recommendations to the Board accordingly. Appointments to the Board are made on merit, with due regard to the benefits of diversity. Within this context, the paramount objective is the selection of the best candidate, irrespective of background, and it is the view of the Board that establishing quotas or targets for the diversity of the Board is not appropriate. All Director appointments must be approved by the Company’s Nominated Adviser, as required under the AIM Rules, before they are appointed to the Board. Prior to appointment, Non-executive Directors are required to demonstrate that they are able to allocate sufficient time to undertake their duties. Re-election The Group’s Rules require that all Directors are submitted for election at the AGM following their first appointment to the Board. Thereafter all Directors will submit themselves for re- election at least once every three years, irrespective of performance. QCA Principle 10: Communicate how the company is governed and is performing by maintaining a dialogue with shareholders and other relevant stakeholders The Group places a high priority on regular communications with its various stakeholder groups and aims to ensure that all communications concerning the Group’s activities are clear, fair and accurate. The Group’s website is regularly to be alerted when updated, and users can register announcements or details of presentations and events are posted onto the website. Notices of General Meetings of the Company can be found here: http://www.webisholdingsplc.com/latest-news/. The results of voting on all resolutions in general meetings are posted to the Group’s website, including any actions to be taken as a result of resolutions for which votes against have been received from at least 20 per cent of independent shareholders. Approval This report was approved by the Board of Directors on 28 November 2022 and signed on its behalf by: Board and committee attendance The number of formal scheduled Board and committee meetings held and attended by Directors during the year was as follows: - Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman 28 November 2022 Board Audit Remuneration Nomination Denham Eke Sir James Mellon Ed Comins Richard Roberts 5/5 2/2 2/2 5/5 2/2 2/2 5/5 1/2 5/5 1/2 - - - - - - 13 Webis Holdings plc Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee Report The Directors have agreed to comply with the provisions of the Quoted Companies Alliance Corporate Governance Code for Small and Mid-Size Quoted Companies (2018) to the extent which is appropriate to its nature and scale of operations. This report illustrates how the Group complies with those principles in relation to its Group Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee. Membership The Committee comprises of two Non-executive Directors and the members are Sir James Mellon (Chairman) and Denham Eke. The composition of the Committee has been reviewed during the year and the Board is satisfied that the Committee members have financial experience and the expertise to resource and fulfil its responsibilities effectively, including those relating to risk and controls. relevant recent Meetings The Committee meets two times a year, including the review of the interim and full year results. Other Directors and representatives the external auditors attend by invitation. from Duties The Committee carries out the duties below for the Company and the Group as a whole, as appropriate: ▪ Monitors the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, including annual and half-yearly reports, interim management statements, and any other formal financial performance, announcement to reviewing significant issues and judgements which they contain. financial reporting relating ▪ Reviews and challenges the consistency of the information presented within the financial statements, compliance with stock exchange or other legal requirements, accounting policies and the methods used to account for significant or unusual transactions. ▪ Keeps under review the effectiveness of the Group’s internal controls and risk management systems. ▪ Reviews the Group’s arrangements for its employees to raise, in confidence, possible wrongdoing in financial reporting or other matters, the procedures for detecting fraud, prevention of bribery and adequacy and effectiveness of the Group’s anti-money laundering systems and control. ▪ KPMG Audit LLC was appointed as auditor in 2002 and the Committee oversees the relationship with them including regular meetings to discuss their remit and review the findings and any issues with the annual audit. It also reviews their terms of appointment, meets them once a year independent of management and considers and makes recommendations to the Board, to be put to the Company for approval at the Annual General Meeting, in relation to the appointment, re-appointment and removal of the Company’s external auditor. There are no contractual restrictions in place in respect of the auditor choice. The Committee is governed by a Terms of Reference and on www.webisholdingsplc.com - the Company’s website. available copy this of is a ▪ 2021 Annual Report During the year the Committee held two meetings and can confirm that it has received sufficient, reliable and timely information from management and the external auditors to enable it to fulfil its responsibilities. The Committee has satisfied there are no relationships between the auditor and the Group which could adversely affect the auditor’s independence and objectivity and regular meetings have been held with them at both the planning stage prior to the audit and after the audit at the reporting stage. itself that All internal control and risk issues that have been brought to the attention of the Committee by the external auditors have been considered and the committee confirms that it is satisfied that management has addressed the issues or has plans to do so. The Group has a number of policies and procedures in place as part of its internal controls and these are subject to continuous review and as a minimum are reviewed by the Committee on an annual basis. the external auditor The Committee has reviewed and discussed together with management and the Company’s financial statements for the year ended 31 May 2022 and reports from the external auditor on the planning for and outcome of their reviews and audit. The key accounting issues and judgements considered relating to the Group’s financial statements and disclosures were as follows: ▪ Revenue recognition – the Committee considered the conditions of revenue recognition, including that of being recognised on an accrual basis. The Committee agreed that the current method of revenue recognition is appropriate for the market that the Group operates within and that revenue satisfied the necessary criteria to be recognised. Disclosures are included in note 1; ▪ Going concern – the Committee reviewed the going concern position of the Group, taking into account the 12-month cash flow forecasts and the continued support of the principal shareholder. The Committee is satisfied that preparing the financial statements on a going concern basis is appropriate. Disclosures are included in note 1; ▪ Cash balances – the Committee reviewed the cash position to ensure that it is able to meet its ongoing requirements and also has sufficient cash reserves to cover the relevant player liabilities. The Committee is satisfied that there are sufficient cash balances to meet its ongoing expenses and cover the player balances in full if required. Disclosures are included in note 12. Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman 28 November 2022 14 Webis Holdings plc Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in Respect of the Annual Report and the Financial Statements The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Group and Parent Company financial statements law and in accordance with applicable regulations. Company law requires the Directors to prepare Group and Parent Company financial statements for each financial year. Under the AIM Rules of the London Stock Exchange, they are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with UK Adopted – International Accounting Standards post Brexit and applicable law and they have elected to prepare the Parent Company financial statements on the same basis. Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Parent Company and of their profit or loss for that period. In preparing each of the Group and Parent Company financial statements, the Directors are required to: • select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable, relevant and reliable; • • • state whether they have been prepared in accordance with UK Adopted – International Accounting Standards post Brexit; assess the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern; and use the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so. responsible The Directors are for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Parent Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Parent Company and enable them to ensure that its financial statements comply with the Companies Acts 1931-2004. They are responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Directors’ Report that complies with that law and those regulations. The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the company’s website. Legislation in the Isle of Man governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. Signed on behalf of the Board. Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman 28 November 2022 15 Webis Holdings plc Report of the Remuneration Committee Directors’ Remuneration Report Isle of Man registered company is no As an requirement to produce a Directors’ Remuneration Report. However, the Board follows best practice and therefore has prepared such a report. there The Directors have agreed to comply with the provisions of the Quoted Companies Alliance Corporate Governance Code for Small and Mid-Size Quoted Companies (2018) to the extent which is appropriate to its nature and scale of operations. This report illustrates how the Group complies with those principles in relation to Directors’ remuneration. The Level and Components of Executive Director Remuneration The Group’s Remuneration Policy reflects the Group’s business strategy and objectives as well as sustained and long-term value creation for shareholders. In addition, the policy aims to be fair and provide equality of opportunity, ensuring that: - ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ the Group is able to attract, develop and retain high- performing and motivated employees in the competitive local and wider US markets; employees are offered a competitive remuneration package to encourage enhanced performance and are, in a fair and responsible manner, rewarded for their individual contribution to the success of the Group; it reflects our culture and values; and there is full transparency of the Group’s Remuneration Policy. In line with the Board’s approach, which reflects that adopted the Group’s within other comparable organisations, Remuneration Policy provides the Executive Director through salary and other benefits. the reward of for Executive Director’s Emoluments The remuneration for the Executive Director reflects their to responsibilities. participate in an annual bonus scheme when is considered appropriate, private healthcare and share option incentives. It comprises basic salary, eligibility this Annual bonus scheme payments are not pensionable and are not contracted. As with staff generally, whose salaries are subject to annual reviews, the basic salary payable to the Executive Director is reviewed each year with reference to jobs carrying similar in comparable e-gaming organisations, responsibilities Emoluments — salaries, bonuses and taxable benefits — fees market conditions generally and competition in view of the Group’s geographical position. local employment It is anticipated that an annual bonus scheme will operate when Group profitability and cash flow allow. Bonuses for the Executive Director are calculated with reference to the profit before tax as disclosed in the audited accounts of the Group, together with an assessment by the Committee of the Director’s performance against agreed personal targets. Bonus payments are not pensionable. The Committee believes that share ownership by executives strengthens the link between their personal interests and those of shareholders. Options are granted to executives periodically at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee. The grant of share options fixed performance criteria. This is deemed to be appropriate as it allows the Committee to consider the performance of the Group and the contribution of the individual executives and, as with annual bonus payments, illustrates the relative importance placed on performance-related remuneration. is not subject to The Group does not intend to contribute to the personal pension plans of Directors in the forthcoming year. Executive Directors’ Contractual Terms The service contract of the Executive Director provides for a notice period of six months. Non-executive Directors’ Remuneration Non-executive Directors do not receive any benefits other than their fees and travelling expenses for which they are reimbursed. The level of fees payable to Non-executive Directors is assessed using benchmarks from a group of comparable e-gaming organisations. The Procedure for Determining Remuneration is responsible two Non- The Remuneration Committee, comprising executive Directors, the remuneration of the Executive Director and is chaired by Sir James Mellon. Committee members do not take part in discussions concerning their own remuneration. The basic Non-executive Director fee is set by the Group Chairman. The Chairman of the Committee reports at the Board meeting following a Committee meeting. for setting It is the view of the Committee that Directors’ remuneration awarded across the Group for the year has been in accordance with the Group’s stated Remuneration Policy and, on behalf of the Committee I recommend that you this Group report. An analysis of Directors’ endorse emoluments is as follows: 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 345 96 441 366 73 439 16 Webis Holdings plc Report of the Remuneration Committee continued Directors’ Emoluments Basic salary US$000 Fees US$000 Bonus US$000 Termination payments US$000 Benefits US$000 2022 Total US$000 2021 Total US$000 320 — — — — 320 — 27 — 21 48 96 — — — — — — — — — — — — 25 — — — — 25 345 366 27 — 21 48 26 20 20 7 441 439 Executive Ed Comins Non-executive Denham Eke* Nigel Caine Sir James Mellon Richard Roberts Aggregate emoluments * Paid to Burnbrae Limited. Details of the options outstanding at 31 May 2022 are as follows: Name of Director 31 May 2021 Granted / (lapsed) in year 31 May 2022 Exercise price Date from which exercisable Expiry date Ed Comins - 2016 Share Option Plan 14,000,000 — 14,000,000 1p 3 March 2019 3 March 2026 14,000,000 — 14,000,000 The market price of the shares at 31 May 2022 was 2.70p. The range during the year was 5.00p to 2.02p. Approval The report was approved by the Board of Directors and signed on behalf of the Board. Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman 28 November 2022 17 Webis Holdings plc Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Webis Holdings plc 1. Our opinion is unmodified We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Webis Holdings plc (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (together, the "Group"), which comprise the consolidated and Company statement of financial position as at 31 May 2022, the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and notes, comprising significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements: • • • give a true and fair view of the state of the Group's and of the Company's affairs as at 31 May 2022 and of the Group's loss for the year then ended; have been properly prepared in accordance with UK Adopted – International Accounting Standards post Brexit; and have been properly prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Acts 1931 to 2004. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our responsibilities are described below. We have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities under, and are independent of the Company and Group in accordance with, UK ethical requirements including the FRC Ethical Standard as applied to public interest entities. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is a sufficient and appropriate basis for our opinion. 2. Key audit matters: our assessment of the risks of material misstatement Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by us, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In arriving at our audit opinion above, the other key audit matters were as follows: 18 Webis Holdings plc Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Webis Holdings plc continued 2. Key audit matters: our assessment of the risks of material misstatement continued The risk Our response Revenue recognition (Group key audit matter) of Consolidated Comprehensive Income: Revenue US$53,612,000 (2021: US$55,668,000) Statement Refer to note 1.2 (Accounting Policy for Revenue) and note 2 (Operating Segments) Revenue recognition - occurrence Our audit procedures included: The Group enters into high volumes of revenue-generating transactions each day which are processed on complex IT systems. There is a risk that a system may not be configured correctly from the outset such that winning and losing bets or commissions are calculated incorrectly, that the systems do not interface correctly from the customer facing systems through to the financial information systems and that unauthorised changes may be made to any of these systems, which may result in the misstatement of revenue. There is also the risk that revenue is materially misstated in order to boost the Group’s earnings position and future outlook may be induced by a number of factors. This may include the Company’s AIM listed status – hence an effort to maintain a high share price and the need to meet both internal goals and external market expectations. the Considering factors above we identified the occurrence of revenue as a significant risk due to fraud and error. Outsourcing controls: • We evaluated the control environment of the service organisations by obtaining and inspecting the latest System and Organisation Controls (SOC) reports upon whose system infrastructure and applications are relied on by the Group. • We tested the operating effectiveness of controls by obtaining and inspecting SOC service from reports organisations. the • We also tested the operating effectiveness of controls which are performed at the user entity level. • We the assessed objectivity, competence and the nature of work performed by the Independent Service Auditor who provides the SOC reports. Tests of details: • We agreed total revenues and payouts recorded by the Group to the reports extracted from the third party service organisation’s system, which we obtained independently from the third party service organisation’s system. • We tested 100 per cent of the other directly related expenses by tracing amounts supplier invoices. recorded to • We recalculated net gaming revenue subtracting total payouts and other directly from revenue. expenses related year met • We have performed cut-off test to ensure that revenue recorded during the for recognition during the year and that revenue earned post year end has not been recorded incorrectly in the year under audit. criteria the • We inspected post year end journals for reversals in revenue. • We compared FX rates used translating revenue to market rates. in 19 Webis Holdings plc Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Webis Holdings plc continued 2. Key audit matters: our assessment of the risks of material misstatement continued The risk Our response Going Concern (Group and Company key audit matter) Refer to basis of preparation note 1.1 Disclosure quality The financial statements explain how the Board has formed a judgement that it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of preparation for the Group and Company. That judgement is based on an evaluation of the inherent risks to the Group and Company’s business model and how those the Group and risks might affect Company’s financial resources or ability to continue operations over a period of at least a year from the date of approval of the financial statements. The risks most likely to adversely affect the Group and Company’s available financial resources over this period were: • • the ability to continue to generate positive cash flows; and the ability of a related entity to provide funding to the Group and Company. There is also less predictable but realistic second order impact, such as the impact of Coronavirus, which could result in a rapid reduction of available financial resources. The risk for our audit was whether or not those risks were such that they amounted to a material uncertainty that may have cast significant doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern. Had they been such, then that fact would have been required to have been disclosed. We considered whether these risks could plausibly affect the liquidity in the going concern period by assessing the Directors’ sensitivities over level of available the financial resources indicated by the Group and Company’s financial forecasts taking account of severe, but plausible, adverse effects that could arise from these risks individually and collectively. Our procedures also included: dependency Key assessment: We inspected a letter received by the Directors indicating the related entity’s intention to provide financial support, held discussions to assess its ability to provide this support over the Group and Company’s going concern assessment, and assessed the business reasons why the related entity may or may not choose to provide this support. the period of assumptions: Benchmarking Critically assessing assumptions in the cash flows included in the approved budgets based on our knowledge of the Group and Company and the sector in which it operates. the Historical comparisons: Assessing reasonableness by budgets of comparing to actual results and considering the previous forecasts. accuracy of historical the Considering analysis: Sensitivity sensitivities over level of available the financial resources indicated by the Group and Company’s financial forecasts taking into account plausible but not unrealistic adverse effects that could arise from these risks individually and collectively. Evaluating Directors’ intent: We evaluated the achievability of the actions the Directors consider they would take to improve the position should the risks materialise. Considering transparency: Assessing whether the going concern disclosure in note 1.1 to the financial statements gives a full and accurate description of the Directors’ assessment of going concern including the identified risks, dependencies and related sensitivities. 20 Webis Holdings plc Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Webis Holdings plc continued 3. Our application of materiality and an overview of the scope of our audit Materiality for the consolidated financial statements as a whole was set at US$42,000, determined with reference to a benchmark of group net gaming revenue of US$5,049,231, of which it represents approximately 0.9% (2021: 0.9%). Materiality for the Company financial statements as a whole was set at US$36,000 (2021: US$23,000). In line with our audit methodology, our procedures on individual account balances and disclosures were performed to a lower threshold, performance materiality, so as to reduce to an acceptable level the risk that individually immaterial misstatements in individual account balances add up to a material amount across the financial statements as a whole. Performance materiality for the Group was set at 75% (2021: 75%) of materiality for the financial statements as a whole, which equates to US$33,000 (2021: US$39,000) for the Group and US$27,000 (US$17,000) for the Company. We applied this percentage in our determination of performance materiality because we did not identify any factors indicating an elevated level of risk. We reported to the Audit Committee any corrected or uncorrected identified misstatements exceeding US$2,200 for the Group and US$1,800 for the Company, in addition to other identified misstatements that warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. Our audit of the Group was undertaken to the materiality level specified above, which has informed our identification of significant risks of material misstatement and the associated audit procedures performed in those areas as detailed above. The group team performed the audit of the Group as if it was a single aggregated set of financial information. The audit was performed using the materiality level set out above and covered 100% of total group revenue, total group loss before tax, and total group assets and liabilities. 4. Going concern The Directors have prepared the consolidated financial statements on the going concern basis as they do not intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease their operations, and as they have concluded that the Group and the Company's financial position means that this is realistic. They have also concluded that there are no material uncertainties that could have cast significant doubt over their ability to continue as a going concern for at least a year from the date of approval of the consolidated financial statements (the “going concern period"). An explanation of how we evaluated management’s assessment of going concern is set out in the related key audit matter in the key audit matters section of this report. Our conclusions based on this work: • we consider that the Directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements is appropriate; • we have not identified, and concur with the Directors' assessment that there is not, a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for the going concern period; and • we found the going concern disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements to be acceptable. However, as we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were made, the above conclusions are not a guarantee that the Group and the Company will continue in operation. 5. Fraud and breaches of laws and regulations – ability to detect Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement due to fraud To identify risks of material misstatement due to fraud (“fraud risks”) we assessed events or conditions that could indicate an incentive or pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity to commit fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included: • • • enquiring of management as to the Group and Company’s policies and procedures to prevent and detect fraud as well as enquiring whether management have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud; reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance; and using analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships. 21 Webis Holdings plc Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Webis Holdings plc continued 5. Fraud and breaches of laws and regulations – ability to detect continued Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement due to fraud continued As required by auditing standards, we perform procedures to address the risk of management override of controls, in particular the risk that management may be in a position to make inappropriate accounting entries. On this audit we do not believe there is a fraud risk related to revenue recognition because the Group and Company’s revenue streams are simple in nature with respect to accounting policy choice and are easily verifiable to external data sources or agreements with little or no requirement for estimation from management. We did not identify any additional fraud risks. We performed procedures including: • • identifying journal entries and other adjustments to test based on risk criteria and comparing any identified entries to supporting documentation; and incorporating an element of unpredictability in our audit procedures. Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement due to non-compliance with laws and regulations We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements from our sector experience and through discussion with management (as required by auditing standards), and from inspection of the Group’s regulatory and legal correspondence, if any, and discussed with management the policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations. As the Group is regulated, our assessment of risks involved gaining an understanding of the control environment including the entity’s procedures for complying with regulatory requirements. The Group is subject to laws and regulations that directly affect the consolidated financial statements including financial reporting legislation and taxation legislation and we assessed the extent of compliance with these laws and regulations as part of our procedures on the related financial statement items. The Group is subject to other laws and regulations where the consequences of non-compliance could have a material effect on amounts or disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, for instance through the imposition of fines or litigation or impacts on the Group and the Company’s ability to operate. We identified financial services regulation as being the area most likely to have such an effect, recognising the regulated nature of the Group’s activities and its legal form. Auditing standards limit the required audit procedures to identify non-compliance with these laws and regulations to enquiry of management and inspection of regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Therefore, if a breach of operational regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from relevant correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach. Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud or breaches of law or regulation Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some material misstatements in the consolidated financial statements, even though we have properly planned and performed our audit in accordance with auditing standards. For example, the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the less likely the inherently limited procedures required by auditing standards would identify it. In addition, as with any audit, there remains a higher risk of non-detection of fraud, as this may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect material misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing non-compliance or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non-compliance with all laws and regulations. 6. Other information The Directors are responsible for the other information, which comprises the strategic report, the Directors’ report and the ither information included in the annual report but does not include the consolidated financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except as explicitly stated below, any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard. 22 Webis Holdings plc Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Webis Holdings plc continued 7. Matters on which we are required to report by exception Under the Companies Acts 1931 to 2004, we are required to report to you if, in our opinion: • adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or the parent Company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or • certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or • • we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit. We have nothing to report in these respects. 8. Respective responsibilities Directors' responsibilities As explained more fully in their statement set out on page 15, the Directors are responsible for: the preparation of the consolidated financial statements including being satisfied that they give a true and fair view; such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; assessing the Group and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern; and using the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor's responsibilities Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue our opinion in an auditor’s report. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but does not guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements. A fuller description of our responsibilities is provided on the FRC’s website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. 9. The purpose of our audit work and to whom we owe our responsibilities This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with section 15 of the Companies Act 1982. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and its members, as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. Russell Kelly For and on behalf of KPMG Audit LLC Chartered Accountants Isle of Man 28 November 2022 23 Webis Holdings plc Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income For the year ended 31 May 2022 Amounts wagered Revenue Cost of sales Betting duty paid Gross profit Operating costs Loss allowance on trade receivables Other gains Government grant Other income Operating (loss) / profit Finance costs (Loss) / profit before income tax Income tax expense (Loss) / profit for the year Total comprehensive (loss) / profit for the year Basic earnings per share for (loss) / profit attributable to the equity holders of the Company during the year (cents) Diluted earnings per share for (loss) / profit attributable to the equity holders of the Company during the year (cents) The notes on pages 28 to 52 form part of these financial statements. Note 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 120,140 132,149 1.2 1.2 21 15 3 4 6 7 7 53,612 55,668 (48,462) (49,757) (101) (114) 5,049 5,797 (5,604) (5,314) 11 20 (48) 324 (248) (126) (374) — (374) (374) 7 2 272 185 949 (125) 824 — 824 824 (0.10) 0.21 (0.09) 0.20 24 Webis Holdings plc Statements of Financial Position As at 31 May 2022 Note 31.05.22 Group US$000 31.05.22 Company US$000 31.05.21 Group US$000 31.05.21 Company US$000 Non-current assets Intangible assets Property, equipment and motor vehicles Investments Bonds and deposits Total non-current assets Current assets Bonds and deposits Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash Trade and other receivables Total current assets Total assets Equity Called up share capital Share option reserve Retained losses Total equity Current liabilities Trade and other payables Loans, borrowings and lease liabilities Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Loans, borrowings and lease liabilities Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Total equity and liabilities 8 9 10 11 11 12 13 17 17 14 16 16 11 724 — 100 835 883 4,139 1,190 6,212 7,047 6,334 42 — 3 3 — 6 — 1,266 821 2,087 2,093 12 380 — 101 493 882 5,083 1,896 7,861 8,354 — 6 3 — 9 — 2,142 150 2,292 2,301 6,334 6,334 6,334 42 42 42 (5,058) (5,711) (4,684) (5,516) 1,318 665 1,692 860 3,640 109 3,749 1,980 1,980 5,729 7,047 78 — 78 1,350 1,350 1,428 2,093 4,995 572 5,567 1,095 1,095 6,662 8,354 91 500 591 850 850 1,441 2,301 The notes on pages 28 to 52 form part of these financial statements. The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 28 November 2022. Denham Eke Non-executive Chairman 25 Webis Holdings plc Statements of Changes in Equity For the year ended 31 May 2022 Group Called up share capital US$000 Share option reserve US$000 Retained earnings US$000 Total equity US$000 Balance as at 31 May 2020 6,334 42 (5,508) 868 Total comprehensive loss for the year: Profit for the year Balance as at 31 May 2021 Total comprehensive profit for the year: Loss for the year Balance as at 31 May 2022 — 6,334 — 6,334 — 42 — 42 824 (4,684) (374) (5,058) 824 1,692 (374) 1,318 Company Called up share capital US$000 Share option reserve US$000 Retained earnings US$000 Total equity US$000 Balance as at 31 May 2020 6,334 42 (5,526) 850 Total comprehensive loss for the year: Profit for the year Balance as at 31 May 2021 Total comprehensive profit for the year: Loss for the year Balance as at 31 May 2022 — 6,334 — 6,334 — 42 — 42 10 (5,516) (195) (5,711) 10 860 (195) 665 The notes on pages 28 to 52 form part of these financial statements. 26 Webis Holdings plc Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows For the year ended 31 May 2022 Cash flows from operating activities (Loss) / profit before income tax Adjustments for: - Depreciation of property, equipment and motor vehicles - Amortisation of intangible assets - Rent concessions received - Loan interest paid - Re-recognition of PPP loan - Government grant utilised - Decrease / (increase) in movement of restricted cash* - Increase in lease liabilities - Other foreign exchange movements Changes in working capital: - Decrease / (increase) in receivables - (Decrease) / increase in payables Net cash (used in) / generated from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Purchase of intangible assets Purchase of property, equipment and motor vehicles Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Loan interest paid Payment of lease liabilities - principal Payment of lease liabilities - interest Rent concessions received Repayment of loans and borrowings Net cash used in financing activities Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Exchange gains / (losses) on cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at end of year The notes on pages 28 to 52 form part of these financial statements. Note 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 (374) 824 9 8 19 15 8 9 19 19 19 16 128 7 (2) 101 48 — 768 25 (66) 706 (1,355) (14) (6) — (6) 119 26 (5) 101 — (272) (375) 24 222 (640) 1,246 1,270 (8) (84) (92) (101) (101) (92) (25) 2 (6) (222) (242) 3,238 66 (92) (24) 5 (5) (217) 961 2,499 (222) 12 3,062 3,238 *Decrease / (increase) in movement of restricted cash, has been reclassified to Operating activities from Cash and cash equivalents. The reclassification has been made to achieve better presentation, as the restricted cash relates to player liabilities, which is part of the operating activity of the Group. The impact of this reclassification on net cash (used in) / generated from operating activities is a decrease of USD 375k on the total as previously reported of USD 1,645k. 27 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 31 May 2022 1 Reporting entity Webis Holdings plc (the “Company”) is a company domiciled in the Isle of Man. The address of the Company’s registered office is Viking House, Nelson Street, Douglas, Isle of Man, IM1 2AH. The Webis Holdings plc consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 May 2022 consolidate those of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group”). 1.1 Basis of preparation (a) Statement of compliance The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK Adopted – International Accounting Standards post Brexit. The Group has consistently applied the accounting policies as set out in note 1.2 to all periods presented in these financial statements. Functional and presentational currency These financial statements are presented in US Dollars which is the Group’s presentational currency. Financial information presented in US Dollars has been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise indicated. All continued operations of the Group have US Dollars as their functional currency. Other information presented In line with the Isle of Man Companies Acts 1931-2004, the Company also presents Parent Company Statements of Financial Position, the Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity and related disclosures (b) Basis of measurement The Group consolidated financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention except where assets and liabilities are required to be stated at their fair value. (c) Use of estimates and judgement The preparation of the Group financial statements in conformity with UK Adopted – International Accounting Standards post Brexit requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge and experience of current events and expected economic conditions, actual results may differ from these estimates. The Directors consider the only critical estimate area to be as follows: • Note 21 – the measurement of Expected Credit Loss (“ECL”) allowance for trade and other receivables and assessment of specific impairment allowances where receivables are past due. Going concern The Group and Parent Company financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. As indicated in the statement of comprehensive income, the Group has incurred a net loss in the current year of US$374,000 (2021: profit of US$824,000) and due to that, net assets reduced from US$1,692,000 to US$1,318,000. 2020/21 results benefitted from the horseracing industry continuing to operate during the lockdown period of the Covid pandemic in 2020, which allowed the industry to attract higher player numbers and wagering volumes, which resulted in improved performance and increased Group profitability during that financial year. While there has been an expected reduction in retail customer numbers as other sports and wagering opportunities opened again, overall, there has still been an improvement in net results when compared to years prior to 2020/21. Extensive efforts have been made to promote the content and markets the Group provides to a wider customer base with an increased focus on player retention. Whilst there can be no certainty as to the level and duration of higher volumes and improved trading results, significant attention is being applied to sustain these trading patterns through attracting and retaining new players. The Group has maintained sufficient operational cash to allow it to continue to meet its liabilities for the foreseeable future. 28 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 1.1 Basis of preparation continued Going concern continued In order to help achieve and maintain its goal of profitability and maintaining adequate liquidity in order to continue its operations the Directors are continuing to pursue strategies that include: • • • broadening the Group’s client base and the continued expansion of its business to customer base; continuing to renew and acquire further US state regulated gaming licenses and continuing to develop and expand the Cal Expo racetrack operation; and taking advantage of the anticipated regulatory change in the State of California’s adoption of sports betting legislation which will further open up opportunities for the Group. Whilst the Directors continue to assess all strategic options in relation to the strategies noted in the previous paragraph, the Directors recognize that the ultimate success of strategies adopted is difficult to predict as they require additional liquidity to pursue the required investment, including bonds to be placed with the relevant authorities to allow for betting on those tracks and excess cost to be paid to service providers to add more servers to allow for increased number of users. The Directors have prepared cash flow forecasts for a period of 12 months from the date of approval of these financial statements which indicate that, taking account of reasonably possible downsides, the Group is projected to have sufficient funds. Projections are inherently uncertain (also considering the history of losses) and, in that regard, the related entity has committed to extend funding in case the Group faces any difficulty to meet its liabilities as they fall due for that period. The Company and the Group have, in previous years, received financial support from Galloway Limited (related entity) and Galloway Limited has expressed its willingness to continue to make funds available as and when needed by the Group and Company. The loans from Galloway Limited stand at US$1,350,000 as at 31 May 2022. As with any company placing reliance on other parties for financial support, the Directors acknowledge that there can be no certainty that this support will continue, although, at the date of approval of these financial statements, they have no reason to believe that it will not do so. Based on these indications, (namely cashflow projections and commitment of support from the related entity), along with the current cash position, the Directors believe that it remains appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis. 1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies During the current year the Group adopted all the new and revised IFRSs that are relevant to its operation and are effective for accounting periods beginning on 1 June 2021. No adoptions had a material effect on the accounting policies of the Group. The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented unless otherwise stated. Basis of consolidation The consolidated financial statements incorporate the results of the Group. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Group obtains control, and continue until the date that such control ceases. Control exists when the Group has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. The Group applies the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred to the former owners of the acquiree and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between the Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated. When necessary amounts reported by subsidiaries have been adjusted to conform with the Group’s accounting policies. 29 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies continued Foreign currency translation (a) Functional and presentation currency Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). As the primary activities of the Group and the primary transactional currency of the Group’s customers are carried out in US Dollars, the consolidated financial statements have been presented in US Dollars. The determination of the presentation currency does not involve significant judgement as the primary activities of the Group are in US Dollars. (b) Transactions and balances Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement, except when deferred in other comprehensive income as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges. Foreign exchange gains and losses that relate to borrowings are presented in the income statement within ‘Finance income’ or ‘Finance costs’. All other foreign exchange gains and losses are presented in the income statement within ‘Other (losses)/gains’. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate. Exchange differences arising are recognised in other comprehensive income. Revenue from contracts with customers The Group generates revenue primarily from the provision of wagering services and the hosting of races on which guests are entitled to participate in the related wagering services. Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer. The Group recognises revenue when it discharges services to a customer. Revenue has been disaggregated by geographical locations which are consistent with the operating segments (note 2). Hosting fees (Racetrack operations) are recognised when the customers participate in the Group’s pari-mutuel pools and the race audio visual signals are transmitted. Hosting fees are recorded on a gross receipts basis. Wagering revenue from the Group’s activities as the race host is recognised when a race on which wagers are placed is completed. The wagering commission from the Group’s commingling of its wagering pools with a host’s pool is recognised when the race on which those wagers are placed is completed. The Group acts as a principal when it allows customers to place wagers in the races it hosts and as an agent when it allows customers to place wagers in other entities’ races. Where the Group acts as a principal, the entire wager is recognised as revenue and where it is an agent the wagering commission the Group retains is recognised as revenue. Settlement terms for revenue where the Group acts as a host is usually 7 days for on and off-track wagering and 30 days from month end for ADW wagering. Where the Group acts as an agent, settlement terms are typically 30 days from month end. Transactions fees (ADW operations) are recognised when the Group facilitates customers’ deposit transactions into their betting accounts. The Group recognises revenue for transaction services net of related winnings. Cost of sales The Group recognises cost of sales related to the Racetrack operations in which it is the race host. The cost of sales includes direct costs such as purses, hub fees, import fees, pay-outs, and other statutory distributions. Government grants The Group initially recognises government grants, that compensate for expenses incurred, as deferred income at fair value if there is a reasonable assurance that they will be received. They are then recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis in the periods in which the expenses are recognised. Segmental reporting Segmental reporting is based on the business areas in accordance with the Group’s internal reporting structure, which allows the individual operating segments to be identified by the disparate nature of the principal activity they undertake. The Group determines and presents segments based on the information that internally is provided to the Board and Managing Director, the Group’s chief operating decision maker. An operating segment is a component of the Group and engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses. An operating segment’s operating results are reviewed regularly by the Board and Managing Director to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available. 30 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies continued Current and deferred income tax The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the income statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively. Current tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year and any adjustment to the tax payable or receivable in respect of previous years. The amount of current tax payable or receivable is the best estimate of the tax amount expected to be paid or received that reflects uncertainty related to income taxes, if any. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax also includes any tax arising from dividends. Current tax assets and liabilities are offset only if certain criteria are met. Deferred income tax is recognised on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, deferred tax liabilities are not recognised if they arise from the initial recognition of goodwill; deferred tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled. Deferred income tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred income tax liabilities are provided on taxable temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries except for deferred income tax liability, where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Only where there is an agreement in place that gives the Group the ability to control the reversal of the temporary difference is the liability not recognised. Deferred income tax assets are recognised on deductible temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries only to the extent that it is probable the temporary difference will reverse in the future and there is sufficient taxable profit available against which the temporary difference can be utilised. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes, assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the balances on a net basis. Intangible assets — goodwill Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries and represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the Group’s interest in net fair value of the net identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquiree and the fair value of the non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to each of the cash-generating units (“CGUs”), or groups of CGUs, that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Each unit or group of units to which the goodwill is allocated represents the lowest level within the entity at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. Goodwill is monitored at the operating segment level. Goodwill impairment reviews are undertaken annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The carrying value of goodwill is compared to the recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and the fair value less costs of disposal. Any impairment is recognised immediately as an expense and is not subsequently reversed. Intangible assets — other (a) Trademarks and licences Separately acquired trademarks and licences are shown at historical cost. Trademarks and licences acquired in a business combination are recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Trademarks and licences have a finite useful life and are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of trademarks and licences over their estimated useful lives of three years. Renewal costs are expensed in the year they relate to. Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software. These costs are amortised over their estimated useful lives of three years. 31 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies continued Intangible assets — other continued (b) Website design and development costs Costs associated with maintaining websites are recognised as an expense as incurred. Development costs that are directly attributable to the design and testing of identifiable and unique websites controlled by the Group are recognised as intangible assets when the following criteria are met: • it is technically feasible to complete the website so that it will be available for use; • management intends to complete the website and use it; • there is an ability to use the website; • it can be demonstrated how the website will generate probable future economic benefits; • adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use the website are available; and • the expenditure attributable to the website during its development can be reliably measured. Directly attributable costs that are capitalised as part of the website include the website employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads. Other development expenditures that do not meet these criteria are recognised as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognised as an expense are not recognised as an asset in a subsequent period. Website development costs recognised as assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives, which do not exceed three years. Property, equipment and motor vehicles Items of property, equipment and motor vehicles are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation (see below) and impairment losses. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognised. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred. The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the financial position date. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of property, equipment and motor vehicles over their estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives of property, equipment and motor vehicles for current and comparative periods are as follows: Plant and equipment 3 years Motor vehicles 3 years Fixtures and fittings 5 years Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognised within ‘Other gains/(losses) – net’ in the income statement. Share-based payment expense The Group operates an equity-settled, share-based compensation plan, under which the entity receives services from employees as consideration for equity instruments (options) of the Group. The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for the grant of the options is recognised as an expense. The total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted: • including any market performance conditions (for example, an entity’s share price); and • excluding the impact of any service and non-market performance vesting conditions (for example, profitability, sales growth targets and remaining an employee of the entity over a specified time-period). Non-market performance and service conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to vest. The total expense is recognised over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. At the end of each reporting period, the Group revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the non-market vesting conditions. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the income statement, with a corresponding adjustment to equity. When the options are exercised, the Company issues new shares. The proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium. 32 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies continued Equity Share capital is determined using the nominal value of shares that have been issued. Equity settled share-based employee remuneration is credited to the share option reserve until related stock options are exercised. On exercise or lapse, amounts recognised in the share option reserve are taken to share capital. Retained earnings include all current and prior period results as determined in the income statement and any other gains or losses recognised in the Statement of Changes in Equity. Financial instruments Recognition and measurement Non-derivative financial instruments include trade and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, bonds and deposits, borrowings and trade and other payables. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the Group’s balance sheet when the Group becomes party to the contractual terms of the instrument. Transaction costs are included in the initial measurement of financial instruments, except financial instruments classified as at fair value through profit and loss. The subsequent measurement of financial instruments is dealt with below. Trade and other receivables Trade and other receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash in bank and in hand as well as bank deposits, money held for processors and cash balances held on behalf of players. Cash equivalents are held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments rather than for investment or other purposes. Bonds and deposits Bonds and deposits are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment. Borrowings Interest-bearing borrowings and overdrafts are recorded at the proceeds received net of direct issue costs. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs are charged on an accrual basis using the effective interest method and are added to the carrying amount of the instrument. Trade and other payables Trade payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Impairment of financial assets The Group uses an impairment model that applies to financial assets measured at amortised cost and contract assets and is detailed below. Financial assets at amortised cost include trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents, bonds and deposits. Performing financial assets Stage 1 From initial recognition of a financial asset to the date on which an asset has experienced a significant increase in credit risk relative to its initial recognition, a stage 1 loss allowance is recognised equal to the credit losses expected to result from its default occurring over the earlier of the next 12 months or its maturity date (‘12-month ECL’). Stage 2 Following a significant increase in credit risk relative to the initial recognition of the financial asset, a stage 2 loss allowance is recognised equal to the credit losses expected from all possible default events over the remaining lifetime of the asset (‘Lifetime ECL’). The assessment of whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk requires considerable judgment, based on the lifetime probability of default (‘PD’). Any financial asset that had been outstanding for greater than 90 days would be assessed on an individual basis to determine if it qualified as a significant increase in credit risk. Stage 1 and 2 allowances are held against performing loans; the main difference between stage 1 and stage 2 allowances is the time horizon. Stage 1 allowances are estimated using the PD with a maximum period of 12 months, while stage 2 allowances are estimated using the PD over the remaining lifetime of the asset. 33 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies continued Financial instruments continued Impairment of financial assets continued Impaired financial assets Stage 3 When a financial asset is considered to be credit-impaired, the allowance for credit losses (‘ACL’) continues to represent lifetime expected credit losses, however, interest income is calculated based on the amortised cost of the asset, net of the loss allowance, rather than its gross carrying amount. The Group applies the ECL model to two main types of financial assets that are measured at amortised cost: Trade receivables, to which the simplified approach (provision matrix) prescribed by IFRS 9 is applied. This approach requires the recognition of a Lifetime ECL allowance on day one. Other financial assets at amortised cost, to which the general three stage model (described above) is applied, whereby a 12- month ECL is recognised initially and the balance is monitored for significant increases in credit risk which triggers the recognition of a Lifetime ECL allowance. ECLs are a probability-weighted estimate of credit losses. ECLs for financial assets that are not credit-impaired at the reporting date are measured as the present value of all cash shortfalls (i.e. the difference between the cash flows due in accordance with the contract and the cash flows that the company expects to receive). ECLs for financial assets that are credit-impaired at the reporting date are measured as the difference between the gross carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows. ECLs are discounted at the effective interest rate of the financial asset which is 0% for all financial assets at amortised cost. The maximum period considered when estimating ECLs is the maximum contractual period over which the Group is exposed to credit risk. The measurement of ECLs considers information about past events and current conditions, as well as supportable information about future events and economic conditions. The Group reviews its impairment methodology for estimating the ECLs, taking into account forward-looking information in determining the appropriate level of allowance. In addition, it identifies indicators and set up procedures for monitoring for significant increases in credit risk. Leases At inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. i. As a lessee The Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement/modification date. The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, and subsequently at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss and adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liability. The right-of-use asset is subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement date to the end of the lease term. The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted at the Group’s applicable incremental borrowing rate (the rate implicit in the lease cannot be determined). The Group has measured the incremental borrowing as equal to external borrowing rates. The lease liability is subsequently increased by the interest cost of the lease liability and decreased by the lease payment made. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, a change in the estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or as appropriate, changes in the assessment of whether a purchase or extension option is reasonably certain to be exercised, or a termination option is reasonably certain not to be exercised. The Group has applied judgment to determine the lease term for some lease contracts in which it is a lessee that include renewal options. The assessment of whether the Group is reasonably certain to exercise such options impacts the lease term, which affects the amount of lease liabilities and right of use assets recognised. Extension/renewal is only available to lessor on terms and conditions to be agreed between both parties. The Group receives rent concessions on its racetrack lease when, due to external factors, the number of days raced in a season is lower than the actual number of days scheduled to be raced. The Group determines its incremental borrowing rate by obtaining interest rates from various external financing sources and makes certain adjustments to reflect the terms of the lease and the type of the asset leased. Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following: - Fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments; 34 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies continued Leases continued i. As a lessee continued - Variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index or rate as at the commencement date; - Amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee; and - The exercise price under a purchase option that the Group is reasonably certain to exercise, lease payments in an optional renewal period if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise an extension option, and penalties for early termination of a lease unless the Group is reasonably certain not to terminate early. The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Group’s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, if the Group changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option or if there is a revised in-substance fixed lease payment. When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of- use asset or is recorded in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero. The Group presents right-of-use assets that do not meet the definition of investment property in ‘property, equipment and motor vehicles’ and lease liabilities in ‘loans, borrowings and lease liabilities’ in the statement of financial position. Short-term leases and leases of low-value assets The Group has elected not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for property rental costs that do not meet the definition of leases under IFRS 16. The Group recognises these costs as an expense on a straight-line basis. Employee benefits (a) Pension obligations The Group does not operate any post-employment schemes, including both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. (b) Short-term employee benefits Short-term employee benefits, such as salaries, paid absences, and other benefits, are accounted for on an accrual’s basis over the period in which employees have provided services in the year. All expenses related to employee benefits are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income in operating costs. (c) Profit sharing and bonus plans The Group recognises a liability and an expense for bonuses and profit sharing, based on a formula that takes into consideration the profit attributable to the Company’s shareholders after certain adjustments. The Group recognises a provision where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. Any recognised liability would be settled within 12 months of the year end. Standards and interpretations in issue not yet adopted A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are not yet effective for the year and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements. The Directors do not expect the adoption of the standards and interpretations to have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements in the period of initial application. Standards Onerous Contracts – Cost of Fulfilling a Contract (Amendments to IAS 37) 2022 Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018 – 2020 Property, Plant and Equipment: Proceeds before Intended Use (Amendments to IAS 16) Reference to the Conceptual Framework (Amendments to IFRS 3) IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Classification of liabilities as current or non-current (Amendments to IAS 1) Amendments to IFRS 17 Disclosure of Accounting Policies (Amendments to IAS1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2) Definition of Accounting Estimate (Amendments to IFRS 8) Deferred Tax related Asset and Liabilities Arising from a Single Transaction – Amendments to IAS 12 Income Taxes Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Ventures (Amendments to FRS 10 and IAS 28) Effective date (accounting periods commencing on or after) 1 January 2022 1 January 2023 35 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 2 Operating Segments A. Basis for segmentation The Group has the below two operating segments, which are its reportable segments. The segments offer different services in relation to various forms of pari-mutuel racing, which are managed separately due to the nature of their activities. Reportable segments and operations provided Racetrack operations – hosting of races through the management and operation of a racetrack facility, enabling patrons to attend and wager on horse racing, as well as utilise simulcast facilities. ADW operations – provision of online ADW services to enable customers to wager into global racetrack betting pools. The Group’s Board of Directors review the internal management reports of the operating segment on a monthly basis. Information about reportable segments B. Information relating to the reportable segments is set out below. Segment revenue along with segment profit / (loss) before tax are used to measure performance as management considers this information to be a relevant indicator for evaluating the performance of the segments. External revenues Segment revenue Segment profit / (loss) before tax Interest expense Depreciation and amortisation Other material non-cash items: - Impairment movement on trade receivables Segment assets Segment liabilities External revenues Segment revenue Segment profit before tax Interest expense Depreciation and amortisation Other material non-cash items: - Impairment movement on trade receivables Segment assets Segment liabilities Reportable segments Racetrack 2022 US$000 51,225 51,225 259 (22) (88) – 2,324 1,522 Corporate operating costs 2022 US$000 ADW 2022 US$000 2,387 2,387 (438) (6) (44) 11 3,387 2,779 – – (195) (98) (3) – 1,336 1,428 Reportable segments Racetrack 2021 US$000 52,640 52,640 390 (23) (79) – 2,138 1,409 Corporate operating costs 2021 US$000 ADW 2021 US$000 3,028 3,028 424 (4) (66) 7 3,915 3,812 – – 10 (98) – – 2,301 1,441 Total 2022 US$000 53,612 53,612 (374) (126) (135) 11 7,047 5,729 Total 2021 US$000 55,668 55,668 824 (125) (145) 7 8,354 6,662 36 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 2 Operating Segments continued C. Reconciliations of information on reportable segments to the amounts reported in the financial statements i. Revenues Total revenue for reportable segments Consolidated revenue ii. (Loss) / profit before tax Total (loss) / profit before tax for reportable segments (Loss) / profit before tax for other segments Consolidated (loss) / profit before tax iii. Assets Total assets for reportable segments Assets for other segments Consolidated total assets iv. Liabilities Total liabilities for reportable segments Liabilities for other segments Consolidated total liabilities v. Other material items Interest expense Depreciation and amortisation Impairment movement on trade receivables 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 53,612 53,612 55,668 55,668 (179) (195) (374) 5,711 1,336 7,047 4,301 1,428 5,729 (126) (135) 11 814 10 824 6,053 2,301 8,354 5,221 1,441 6,662 (125) (145) 7 There were no reconciling items noted between Segment information and the Financial Statements. D. Geographic information i. Revenues The below table analyses the geographic location of the customer base of the operating segments. Revenue Racetrack operations ADW operations ADW operations ADW operations 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 North America 51,225 52,640 North America 1,833 2,294 British Isles Caribbean 527 27 734 – 53,612 55,668 37 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 2 Operating Segments continued D. Geographic information continued ii. Non-current assets The geographical information below analyses the Group’s non-current assets by the Company’s Country of Domicile (Isle of Man) and the United States of America. Information is based on geographical location of the Group’s assets. United States of America Isle of Man Non-current assets exclude financial instruments. 3 Operating (loss) / profit Operating (loss) / profit is stated after charging: Auditors’ remuneration — audit Depreciation of property, equipment and motor vehicles Amortisation of intangible assets Exchange losses / (gains) Directors’ fees 4 Finance costs Loan interest payable Finance costs 5 Staff numbers and cost Average number of employees – Pari-mutuel and Racetrack Operations The aggregate payroll costs of these persons were as follows: Pari-mutuel and Racetrack Operations Wages and salaries Social security costs 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 731 4 735 386 6 392 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 153 128 7 7 96 136 119 26 (2) 73 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 (126) (126) (125) (125) 2022 2021 52 52 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 1,707 127 1,834 1,676 116 1,792 38 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 6 Income tax expense (a) Current and Deferred Tax Expenses The current and deferred tax expenses for the year were US$Nil (2021: US$Nil). Despite having made losses, no deferred tax was recognised as there is no reasonable expectation that the Group will recover the resultant deferred tax assets. (b) Tax Rate Reconciliation (Loss) / profit before tax Tax charge at IOM standard rate (0%) Adjusted for: Tax credit for US tax (losses) gains (at 21%) Add back deferred tax losses / (gains) not recognised Tax charge for the year 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 (374) – (91) 91 – 824 – 118 (118) – The maximum deferred tax asset that could be recognised at year end is approximately US$985,000 (2021: US$894,000). The Group has not recognised any asset as it might not be recoverable within the allowed period. 7 Earnings per ordinary share The calculation of the basic earnings per share is based on the earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is based on the basic earnings per share, adjusted to allow for the issue of shares, on the assumed conversion of all dilutive share options. An adjustment for the dilutive effect of share options in the current period has not been reflected in the calculation of the diluted profit per share, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. (Loss) / profit for the year Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue Dilutive element of share options if exercised (note 17) Diluted number of ordinary shares Basic earnings per share (cents) Diluted earnings per share (cents) 2022 US$000 (374) No. 2021 US$000 824 No. 393,338,310 393,338,310 14,000,000 14,000,000 407,338,310 407,338,310 (0.10) (0.09) 0.21 0.20 The earnings applied are the same for both basic and diluted earnings calculations per share as there are no dilutive effects to be applied. 39 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 8 Intangible assets Goodwill Software & development costs Total Group US$000 Group US$000 Company US$000 Group US$000 Company US$000 Cost Balance at 1 June 2020 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Amortisation and Impairment Balance at 1 June 2020 Amortisation for the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Amortisation for the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Carrying amounts At 1 June 2020 At 31 May 2021 At 31 May 2022 177 – 177 177 – 177 177 – 177 177 – 177 – – – 598 8 606 606 6 612 568 26 594 594 7 601 30 12 11 15 – 15 15 – 15 15 – 15 15 – 15 – – – 775 8 783 783 6 789 745 26 771 771 7 778 30 12 11 15 – 15 15 – 15 15 – 15 15 – 15 – – – The Group reviews intangible assets annually for impairment or more frequently if there are indications that the intangible assets may be impaired (see note 1). . 40 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 9 Property, equipment and motor vehicles Group Cost Balance at 1 June 2020 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Depreciation Balance at 1 June 2020 Charge for the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Charge for the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Carrying amounts At 1 June 2020 At 31 May 2021 At 31 May 2022 Company Cost Balance at 1 June 2020 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Computer Equipment US$000 Fixtures, Fittings & Track Equipment US$000 Motor Vehicles US$000 Right-of- use Assets US$000 Total US$000 162 4 166 166 – 166 155 5 160 160 3 163 7 6 3 241 80 321 321 – 321 241 9 250 250 18 268 – 71 53 50 – 50 50 – 50 17 7 24 24 7 31 33 26 19 473 – 926 84 473 1,010 473 1,010 472 945 472 1,482 98 98 196 196 100 296 375 277 649 511 119 630 630 128 758 415 380 724 Computer Equipment US$000 Fixtures & Fittings US$000 Total US$000 33 4 37 37 – 37 80 – 80 80 – 80 113 4 117 117 – 117 41 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 9 Property, equipment and motor vehicles continued Company Depreciation Balance at 1 June 2020 Charge for the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Charge for the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Carrying amounts At 1 June 2020 At 31 May 2021 At 31 May 2022 10 Investments Computer Equipment US$000 Fixtures & Fittings US$000 Total US$000 26 5 31 31 3 34 7 6 3 80 – 80 80 – 80 – – – 106 5 111 111 3 114 7 6 3 Investments in subsidiaries are held at cost. Details of investments at 31 May 2022 are as follows: Subsidiaries Country of incorporation WatchandWager.com Limited Isle of Man Activity Holding (%) Operation of interactive wagering totaliser hub WatchandWager.com LLC United States of America Operation of interactive wagering totaliser hub and harness racetrack Technical Facilities & Services Limited Isle of Man betinternet.com (IOM) Limited Isle of Man Dormant Dormant 100 100 100 100 Technical Facilities & Services Limited was dissolved after the year end. A wholly owned subsidiary, B. E. Global Services Ltd was dissolved in May 2022. 11 Bonds and deposits Group Company 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 Bonds and deposits which expire within one year Bonds and deposits which expire within one to two years Bonds and deposits which expire within two to five years 883 – 100 983 882 – 101 983 – – – – – – – – 42 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 11 Bonds and deposits continued Cash bonds of US$875,000 have been paid as security deposits in relation to various US State ADW licences (2021: US$875,000). These cash bonds are held in trust accounts used exclusively for cash collateral, with financial institutions which have been screened for their financial strength and capitalization ratio. The financial institutions have a credit rating of A- Excellent from AM Best credit rating agency. Therefore, these bonds are considered to be fully recoverable. A rent deposit of US$100,000 is held by California Exposition & State Fair and is for a term of 8 years (2021: US$100,000). This is held by an entity of the Californian state government and is therefore considered fully recoverable. Rent and other security deposits total US$8,227 (2021: US$8,315). These deposits are repayable upon completion of the relevant lease term, under the terms of legally binding agreements. The fair value of the bonds and deposits approximates to the carrying value. 12 Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash Cash and cash equivalents – company and other funds Restricted cash – protected player funds Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash Group Company 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 3,062 1,077 4,139 3,238 1,845 5,083 189 1,077 312 1,830 1,266 2,142 The Group holds funds for operational requirements and for its non-Isle of Man customers, shown as ‘company and other funds’ and on behalf of its Isle of Man regulated customers and certain USA state customers, shown as ‘protected player funds’. Protected player funds are held in fully protected client accounts within an Isle of Man regulated bank and in segregated accounts within a USA regulated bank. 13 Trade and other receivables Trade receivables Amounts due from Group undertakings Other receivables and prepayments Group Company 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 395 – 795 907 – 989 1,190 1,896 – 757 64 821 – 98 52 150 Included within trade receivables are impairment provisions of US$67,293 (see note 21), (2021: US$78,002). Amounts due from Group undertakings are unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand. 14 Trade and other payables Trade payables Amounts due to customers Taxes and national insurance Accruals and other payables Group Company 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 659 2,037 16 928 3,640 686 2,968 15 1,326 4,995 7 – 2 69 78 33 – 2 56 91 43 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 15 Deferred income (Government Grant) The Group received a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan for US$319,994, under the provisions of the US CARES Act in May 2020 to support certain incurred expenses. The provisions of the loan allowed for an application for loan forgiveness, directly relating to expenditure incurred in the 24-week period from the date of the loan advance, of which at least 60% must be on payroll related expenditure. The Group had ascertained reasonable assurance that the loan should be forgiven in its entirety and the application for forgiveness was submitted in June 2021, with the application agreed by the lending bank. The grant was recognised in profit or loss in the periods that the relevant expenses were recognised. After final review by the Small Business Administration, it was determined that the lending bank had calculated and advanced a loan amount greater than it should have. The resultant difference of US$48,427 is a recognised as a loan (financial liability) at year end (see note 16). 16 Loans, borrowings and lease liabilities Current liabilities Unsecured loans (current portion) Lease liabilities (current portion) Secured loans – Galloway Limited Non-current liabilities Unsecured loans (non-current portion) Lease liabilities (non-current portion) Secured loans – Galloway Limited Terms and repayment schedule Unsecured loans Lease liabilities Secured loan – Galloway Limited* Secured loan – Galloway Limited* Secured loan – Galloway Limited* Total loans and borrowings Group Company 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 20 89 – 109 6 66 500 572 – – – – – – 500 500 Group Company 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 47 583 1,350 1,980 19 226 850 1,095 – – 1,350 1,350 – – 850 850 Nominal interest rate Year of maturity 1.00-8.90% 2025 6.00-9.50% 2023-30 7.75% 7.00% 7.00% 2027 2024 2025 2022 Total US$000 2021 Total US$000 67 672 500 350 500 25 292 500 350 500 2,089 1,667 The Group received an unsecured Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan for US$48,427, which matures on 7 May 2025 and attracts interest at 1% per annum (see note 15). The secured loans from Galloway Limited are secured over the unencumbered assets of the Group. *Based on current interest rates, the estimated fair value of the Galloway Limited loans is US$1.315m. 44 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 16 Loans, borrowings and lease liabilities continued Reconciliation of movements of liabilities to cash flows arising from financing activities Balance at 1 June 2020 Changes from financing cash flows Proceeds from loans, borrowings and lease liabilities Repayment of borrowings Payment of lease liabilities Interest paid Total changes from financing cash flows Other changes Liability-related Rent concession received Interest expense Total liability-related other changes Balance at 31 May 2021 Other loans and borrowings US$000 Lease liabilities US$000 Total US$000 1,380 384 1,764 – (5) – (101) (106) – 101 101 1,375 24 – (111) (24) (111) (5) 24 19 292 24 (5) (111) (125) (217) (5) 125 120 1,667 Balance at 1 June 2021 1,375 292 1,667 Changes from financing cash flows Proceeds from loans, borrowings and lease liabilities Repayment of borrowings Payment of lease liabilities Interest paid Total changes from financing cash flows Other changes Liability-related New leases Rent concession received Interest expense Total liability-related other changes Balance at 31 May 2022 48 (6) – (101) (59) – – 101 101 1,417 25 – (115) (25) (115) 472 (2) 25 495 672 73 (6) (115) (126) (174) 472 (2) 126 596 2,089 45 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 17 Share capital No. 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 Allotted, issued and fully paid At beginning and close of year: ordinary shares of 1p each 393,338,310 6,334 6,334 At 31 May: ordinary shares of 1p each 393,338,310 6,334 6,334 The authorised share capital of the Company is US$9,619,000 divided into 600,000,000 ordinary shares of £0.01 each (2021: US$9,619,000 divided into 600,000,000 ordinary shares of £0.01 each). Options Movements in share options during the year ended 31 May 2022 were as follows: At 31 May 2021 – 1p ordinary shares Options granted Options lapsed Options exercised At 31 May 2022 – 1p ordinary shares No. 14,000,000 – – – 14,000,000 During 2016 the Group established an equity-settled share-based option program. The fair value of options granted is recognised as an expense, with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date using a Black- Scholes model and is spread over the vesting period. The amount recognised in equity is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options which are expected to vest. By taking into consideration the volatility of the shares over the 3 years prior to granting, the volatility of the options is calculated at 75%, with a risk-free interest rate of 0.86%. The options were issued on 3 March 2016 to Ed Comins, Managing Director of the Group. The fair value of each option on the grant date was estimated as being £0.0022. The share options vested on 3 March 2019 after Ed Comins had remained in the employment of the Group for 3 years from when the options were granted. The options are able to be exercised from 3 March 2019 and expire on 2 March 2026. The weighted average exercise price of all options is £0.01. The charge for share options recorded in profit and loss for the year was US$Nil (2021: US$Nil). Since the grant date, the total charge in relation to the share options was US$42,126. 18 Capital commitments As at 31 May 2022, the Group had no capital commitments (2021: US$Nil). 19 Leases A. Leases as lessee The Group leases office and racetrack facilities. The office facility is leased until May 2023, with an average length of renewal of between two to three years. The racetrack facility is leased until May 2030, with extensions or renewals typically ranging between three to five years. The Group also leases additional office facilities with contract terms of no more than one year. These leases are short-term and the Group has elected not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for these leases. Information about leases for which the Group is a lessee is presented below. i. Right-of-use assets Right-of-use assets related to leased properties that do not meet the definition of investment property are presented within property, equipment and motor vehicles. 46 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 19 Leases continued A. Leases as lessee continued i. Right of use assets continued Group Cost Balance at 1 June 2020 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Additions during the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Depreciation Balance at 1 June 2020 Charge for the year Balance at 31 May 2021 Balance at 1 June 2021 Charge for the year Balance at 31 May 2022 Carrying amounts At 1 June 2020 At 31 May 2021 At 31 May 2022 ii. Amounts recognised in profit or loss Interest on lease liabilities Depreciation expense Rent concessions received Expenses relating to short-term leases iii. Amounts recognised in statement of cash flows Payment of lease liabilities - principal Payment of lease liabilities - interest Rent concessions received Property US$000 Total US$000 473 – 473 473 472 945 98 98 196 196 100 296 375 277 649 473 – 473 473 472 945 98 98 196 196 100 296 375 277 649 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 25 100 (2) 71 24 98 (5) 69 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 (92) (25) 2 (92) (24) 5 47 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 20 Related party transactions Identity of related parties The Parent Company has a related party relationship with its subsidiaries (see note 10), and with its Directors and executive officers and with Burnbrae Ltd (significant shareholder). Transactions with and between subsidiaries Transactions with and between the subsidiaries in the Group, which have been eliminated on consolidation, are considered to be related party transactions. Transactions with entities with significant influence over the Group Rental and service charges of US$46,914 (2021: US$45,652) and Directors’ fees of US$27,193 (2021: US$26,461) were charged in the year by Burnbrae Limited, of which Denham Eke is a common Director. The Group also had loans of US$1,350,000 (2021: US$1,350,000) from Galloway Limited, a company related to Burnbrae Limited by common ownership and Directors (note 16). Transactions with key management personnel The total amounts for Directors’ remuneration were as follows: Emoluments — salaries, bonuses and taxable benefits — fees 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 345 96 441 366 73 439 Directors’ Emoluments Executive Ed Comins Non-executive Denham Eke* Nigel Caine Sir James Mellon Richard Roberts Aggregate emoluments * Paid to Burnbrae Limited. Basic salary US$000 Fees US$000 Bonus US$000 Termination payments US$000 Benefits US$000 2022 Total US$000 2021 Total US$000 320 — — — — 320 — 27 — 21 48 96 — — — — — — — — — — — — 25 — — — — 25 345 366 27 — 21 48 26 20 20 7 441 439 14,000,000 share options were issued to Ed Comins (see note 17) during 2016. 21 Financial risk management Capital structure The Group’s capital structure is as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Loans and similar liabilities Net funds Shareholders’ equity Capital employed 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 3,062 3,238 (1,417) (1,375) 1,645 1,863 (1,318) (1,692) 327 171 48 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 21 Financial risk management continued Capital structure continued The Group’s policy is to maintain as strong a capital base as possible, insofar as can be sustained due to the fluctuations in the net results of the Group and the inherent effect this has on the capital structure. The Group’s principal financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables that arise directly from its operations. The main purpose of these financial instruments is to finance the Group’s operations. The existence of the financial instruments exposes the Group to a number of financial risks, which are described in more detail below. The principal risks which the Group is exposed to relate to liquidity risks, credit risks and foreign exchange risks. Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will be unable to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s objective is to maintain continuity of funding through trading and share issues but to also retain flexibility through the use of short-term loans if required. Management controls and monitors the Group’s cash flow on a regular basis, including forecasting future cash flow. Banking facilities are kept under review to ensure they meet the Group’s requirements. Funds equivalent to customer balances are held in designated bank accounts where applicable to ensure that Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission player protection principles are met. Other customer balances are covered by cash funds held within the Group and by receivables due from ADW racetrack settlement partners. The Directors anticipate that the business will maintain sufficient cash flow in the forthcoming period, to meet its immediate financial obligations. The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities: 2022 Financial liabilities Carrying amount US$000 Contractual cash flow US$000 6 months or less US$000 Up to 1 year US$000 1–5 years US$000 5+ years US$000 Trade payables (659) (659) (659) Amounts due to customers (2,037) (2,037) (2,037) Other payables and loans Lease liabilities (1,899) (2,214) (673) (952) (541) (26) – – – – (58) (1,615) – – – (121) (460) (345) (5,268) (5,862) (3,263) (179) (2,075) (345) 2021 Financial liabilities Trade payables Amounts due to customers Other payables and loans Lease liabilities Carrying amount US$000 Contractual cash flow US$000 6 months or less US$000 Up to 1 year US$000 1–5 years US$000 5+ years US$000 (686) (686) (686) (2,968) (2,968) (2,968) (2,269) (2,507) (292) (338) (947) (13) (6,215) (6,499) (4,614) – – (893) (72) (965) – – (667) (253) (920) – – – – – 49 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 21 Financial risk management continued Credit risk Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation. Impairment losses on financial assets recognised in profit or loss were as follows: Non-credit impaired trade receivables Credit impaired trade receivables Total impairment losses 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 5 62 67 16 62 78 The Group’s exposure to credit risk is influenced by the characteristics of the individual racetracks and the settling agents operating on behalf of these tracks. The racetracks themselves are influenced by many factors, including the product they offer, supporting sources of revenue they might generate, such as offering simulcast, slots or sports wagering facilities, current economic conditions, ownership structure, state laws and so on, all of which may affect their liquidity and ability to operate. The Group limits its exposure to credit risk by regular settling and verification of balances due to and from settling agents, with standard terms of one month. While there is on occasion debt that is slower to be settled, historical settlements for at least the last six years show that of the current trade receivable balance, greater than 99% would be expected to be received. In addition, the majority of the current Group customers have transacted with the Group for five years or more and none of these customers balances have been specifically impaired in that period. The Group has continued to take a conservative approach to the assessment of the Weighted Average Loss Rate and maintained rates that are considered to reflect the risk that exists under current market conditions. The following table provides information about exposure to credit risk and expected credit losses for trade receivables as at 31 May 2022: 2022 Current (not past due) 1-30 days past due 31-60 days past due 61-90 days past due More than 90 days past due More than 90 days past due 2021 Current (not past due) 1-30 days past due 31-60 days past due 61-90 days past due More than 90 days past due More than 90 days past due Weighted Average Loss Rate (%) 1.00% 2.00% 5.00% 7.00% 10.00% 100.00% Gross Carrying Amount US$000 374 9 16 (1) 2 62 462 Loss Allowance US$000 (4) (0) (1) (0) (0) (62) (67) Net Carrying Amount US$000 370 9 15 (1) 2 — 395 Credit Impaired No No No No No Yes Weighted Average Loss Rate (%) 1.00% 2.00% 5.00% 7.00% 10.00% 100.00% Gross Carrying Amount US$000 479 406 10 20 8 62 985 Loss Allowance US$000 (5) (8) (1) (1) (1) (62) (78) Net Carrying Amount US$000 474 398 9 19 7 — 907 Credit Impaired No No No No No Yes 50 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 21 Financial risk management continued Credit risk continued The Group uses an allowance matrix to measure the ECLs of trade receivables from racetracks and their settling agents, which comprise a moderate number of balances, ranging from small to large. The Group has reviewed its historical losses over the past four years as well as considering current economic conditions in estimating the loss rates and calculating the corresponding loss allowance. Classes of financial assets — carrying amounts Cash and cash equivalents Bonds and deposits Trade and other receivables 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 3,062 983 1,063 5,108 3,238 983 1,766 5,987 Generally, the maximum credit risk exposure of financial assets is the carrying amount of the financial assets as shown on the face of the balance sheet (or in the notes to the financial statements). Credit risk, therefore, is only disclosed in circumstances where the maximum potential loss differs significantly from the financial asset’s carrying amount. The maximum exposure to credit risks for receivables in any business segment: Pari-mutuel 2022 US$000 2021 US$000 1,063 1,766 Of the above receivables, US$395,000 (2021: US$907,000) relates to amounts owed from racing tracks. These receivables are actively monitored to avoid significant concentration of credit risk and the Directors consider there to be no significant concentration of credit risk. The Directors consider that all the above financial assets that are not impaired for each of the reporting dates under review are of good credit quality. The banks have external credit ratings of at least Baa3 from Moody’s. The credit risk for liquid funds and other short-term financial assets is considered negligible, since the counterparties are reputable banks with high-quality external credit ratings. Interest rate risk The Group finances its operations mainly through capital with limited levels of borrowings. Cash at bank and in hand earns negligible interest at floating rates, based principally on short-term interbank rates. Any movement in interest rates would not be considered to have any significant impact on net assets at the balance sheet date as the Group and Parent Company do not have floating rate loans payable. Foreign currency risks The Group operates internationally and is subject to transactional foreign currency exposures, primarily with respect to Pounds Sterling, Hong Kong Dollars and Euros. The Group does not actively manage the exposures but regularly monitors the Group’s currency position and exchange rate movements and makes decisions as appropriate. At the reporting date the Group had the following exposure: 2022 Current assets Current liabilities Short-term exposure USD US$000 GBP US$000 EUR US$000 HKD US$000 Total US$000 5,197 (2,705) 2,492 236 (317) (81) 85 (69) 16 568 6,086 (642) (3,733) (74) 2,353 51 Webis Holdings plc Notes to the Financial Statements continued 21 Financial risk management continued Foreign currency risks continued 2021 Current assets Current liabilities Short-term exposure USD US$000 GBP US$000 EUR US$000 HKD US$000 Total US$000 6,710 (4,778) 1,932 283 (339) (56) 78 (85) (7) 659 7,730 (700) (5,902) (41) 1,828 The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the net result for the year and equity with regards to the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities and the US Dollar–Sterling exchange rate, US Dollar–Euro exchange rate and US Dollar–Hong Kong Dollar exchange rate. A 5% weakening of the US Dollar against the following currencies at 31 May 2022 would have increased / (decreased) equity and profit and loss by the amounts shown below: 2022 Current assets Current liabilities Net assets 2021 Current assets Current liabilities Net assets GBP US$000 EUR US$000 HKD US$000 Total US$000 12 (16) (4) 4 (3) 1 28 (32) (4) 44 (51) (7) GBP US$000 EUR US$000 HKD US$000 Total US$000 14 (17) (3) 4 (4) – 33 (35) (2) 51 (56) (5) A 5% strengthening of the US Dollar against the above currencies would have had the equal but opposite effect on the above currencies to the amounts shown above on the basis that all other variables remain constant. 22 Controlling party and ultimate controlling party The Directors consider the ultimate controlling party to be Burnbrae Limited and its beneficial owner Jim Mellon by virtue of their combined shareholding of 63.10%. 23 Subsequent events To the knowledge of the Directors, there have been no other material events since the end of the reporting period that require disclosure in the accounts. 52 Webis Holdings plc Notice of Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting of Webis Holdings plc (the “Company”) will be held at The Claremont Hotel, 18/19 Loch Promenade, Douglas, Isle of Man, on 30 January 2023 at 10 am for the purpose of transacting the below business. The Board considers it important that all shareholders should have the opportunity to exercise their voting rights at the AGM. To this end, the Company invites shareholders to complete the voting proxy form as early as possible. Shareholders may also submit questions to the Company Secretary either in writing at the registered office or by email to ir@webisholdingsplc.com prior to the meeting and as early as possible. Ordinary Business 1 To receive and adopt the report of the Directors and the accounts for the year ended 31 May 2022. 2 To re-elect as a director Denham Eke who retires by rotation and, being eligible, offers himself for re-election in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association. 3 To re-elect as a director Katie Errock who retires at the date of the first general meeting following appointment and, being eligible, offers herself for re-election in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association. 4 To reappoint KPMG Audit LLC as auditors and to authorise the Directors to determine their remuneration. Special Business To consider and, if thought fit, to pass the following resolutions: As an Ordinary Resolution 5 That the authority granted by special resolution to the Directors of the Company to allot relevant securities up to an amount equal to but not exceeding the authorised but unissued share capital of the Company for the time being which was passed at the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 9 December 2002 be renewed pursuant to the power provided by Article 6(C) of the Company’s Articles of Association, that such renewal of authority be for the exercise of that power generally and unconditionally and in all respects in the same terms as originally granted, and that such authority shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the date of passing of this resolution unless renewed, varied or revoked by the Company in General Meeting. As a Special Resolution 6 The Directors of the Company be and they are hereby empowered pursuant to Article 8 of the Company’s Articles of Association (the “Articles”) to allot equity securities (as defined in Article 7(H) of the Articles) pursuant to the authority conferred on the Directors to allot relevant securities by Resolution 4 above as if Article 7(A) of the Articles did not apply to such allotment PROVIDED THAT this power shall be limited to: (i) the allotment of equity securities in connection with a rights issue in favour of ordinary shareholders where the equity securities are issued proportionally (or as nearly as may be) to the respective number of ordinary shares held by such shareholders (but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the Directors may deem necessary or expedient to deal with issues arising under the laws of any territory or the requirements of any regulatory body or any stock exchange in any territory or the fixing of exchange rates applicable to any such equity securities where such equity securities are to be issued to shareholders in more than one territory, or legal or practical problems in respect of overseas shareholders, fractional entitlements or otherwise howsoever); (ii) the allotment of equity securities to holders of any options under any share option scheme of the Company for the time being in force, on the exercise by them of any such options; and (iii) the allotment (otherwise than pursuant to paragraphs (i) or (ii) above) of equity securities up to a maximum aggregate nominal value equal to 50% of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company for the time being. The power hereby conferred shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the date of passing of this resolution unless such power shall be renewed in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the said Article 8 of the Articles, save that the Company may before such expiry make an offer or agreement which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry and the Directors may allot equity securities pursuant to such offer or agreement as if the power conferred hereby had not expired. As Ordinary Resolutions 7 That in accordance with Article 12 of the Company’s Articles of Association and with Section 13 of the Companies Act 1992 the Company be generally and unconditionally authorised to make market purchases (as defined by Section 13(2) of the Companies Act 1992) of ordinary shares of 1 pence each in its capital, provided that: (a) the maximum number of shares that may be acquired is 39,333,831; (b) the minimum price that may be paid for the shares is 1 pence; (c) the maximum price that may be paid is, for a share the Company contracts to purchase on any day, a sum equal to 105% of the average of the upper and lower quotations on the Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange for the ordinary shares of the Company on the five business days immediately preceding that day; and (d) the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the date of the passing of this resolution unless renewed, varied or revoked by the Company in General Meeting, but not so as to prejudice the completion of a purchase contracted before that date. 53 Webis Holdings plc Notice of Meeting continued As Ordinary Resolutions continued 8 That the Report of the Remuneration Committee be received and adopted. By order of the Board Katie Errock Company Secretary 28 November 2022 Registered Office: Viking House Nelson Street, Douglas Isle of Man, IM1 2AH Notes 1. Members are entitled to appoint a proxy to exercise all or any of their rights to attend and vote on their behalf at the meeting. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company. A shareholder may appoint more than one proxy in relation to the Annual General Meeting provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise the rights attached to a different share or shares held by that shareholder. than one proxy you may To appoint more photocopy the proxy form accompanying this notice. Please indicate the proxy holder’s name and the number of shares in relation to which they are authorised in to act as your proxy aggregate, should not exceed the number of shares held by you). Please also indicate if the proxy instruction is one of multiple instructions being given. All forms must be signed and should be returned together in the same envelope. (which, 2. To be valid, the form of proxy and the power of attorney or other authority (if any) under which it is signed - or a notarially certified or office copy of such power or authority - must be lodged at the following postal address of the Company’s registrars, PXS 1, Link Group, Unit 10, Central Square, 29 Wellington Street, Leeds, LS1 4DL by hand, or sent by post, so as to be received not less than 48 hours before the time fixed for the holding of the meeting or any adjournment thereof (as the case may be). 3. The completion and return of a form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending in person at the meeting and voting should he wish to do so. 4. In the case of a corporation, the form of proxy must be executed under its common seal or the hand of an officer or attorney duly authorised. 5. A member may appoint a proxy of his or her own choice. If the name of the member’s choice is not entered in the space provided on the form of proxy, the return of the form of proxy duly signed will authorise the chairman of the meeting to act as that member’s proxy. 6. To abstain from voting on a resolution, select the relevant ‘withheld’ box. A vote withheld is not a vote in law and will not be counted in the calculation of votes for or against the resolution. If no voting indication is given, your proxy will vote or abstain from voting at his or her discretion. Your proxy will vote (or abstain from voting) as he or she thinks fit in relation to any other matter which is put before the meeting. 7. Pursuant to regulation 22 of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2005, the Company has specified that only those members entered on the register of members at 10 a.m. on 26 January 2023 shall be entitled to attend and vote at the meeting. Changes to the register after 10 a.m. on 26 January 2023 shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend and vote at the meeting. 8. Where a corporation is to be represented at the meeting by a personal representative, such corporation must deposit a certified copy of the resolution of its Directors or other governing body authorising the appointment of the representative at the Company’s registered office: Viking House, Nelson Street, Douglas, Isle of Man, IM1 2AH not later than 48 hours before the time appointed for the holding of the meeting. 54 Webis Holdings plc 55 Webis Holdings plc Nominated Adviser and Broker Beaumont Cornish Limited Building 3, Chiswick Park 566 Chiswick High Road London W4 5YA Legal Advisors Long & Co Limited Eyreton Quarterbridge Road Douglas Isle of Man IM2 3RF UK Registrar Link Asset Services The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road Beckenham Kent BR3 4TU Corporate Website www.webisholdingsplc.com Twitter @WebisHoldings Company Information Directors Denham Eke Non-Executive Chairman Ed Comins Managing Director Sir James Mellon Independent Non-Executive Director Richard Roberts Independent Non-Executive Director Katie Errock Non-Executive Director Company Secretary Katie Errock Registered Office Viking House Nelson Street Douglas, Isle of Man IM1 2AH Bankers Nedbank Private Wealth Ltd St Mary’s Court 20 Hill Street Douglas Isle of Man IM1 1EU Auditors KPMG Audit LLC Chartered Accountants Heritage Court 41 Athol Street Douglas, Isle of Man IM1 1LA 56 Webis Holdings plc Webis Holdings plc Viking House, Nelson Street Douglas, Isle of Man IM1 2AH, British Isles Email: ir@webisholdingsplc.com Website: www.webisholdingsplc.com 57
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above