Quarterlytics / Technology / Software - Infrastructure / WEX / FY2008 Annual Report

WEX
Annual Report 2008

WEX · NYSE Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker WEX
Exchange NYSE
Sector Technology
Industry Software - Infrastructure
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2008 Annual Report · WEX
Loading PDF…
2008 ANNUAL REPORT

34995_Cover   1

34995_Cover   1

3/28/09   2:16:13 AM

3/28/09   2:16:13 AM

1983

  Wright Express begins

  operations

  Wright Express card accepted

  at three ATM-style gas pumps

in Portland, Maine

1986

  First private label partner signed

ABOUT
WRIGHT EXPRESS

From the beginning of our history, Wright Express has had a

vision; a vision built on relationships. During our formative early 

years we established our foundation of integrity, and embraced

the fundamental value of establishing enduring relationships.

These relationships have enabled us to become a leading provider

of payment processing and information management services.

1993

Wright Express markets its services directly to fl eets and indirectly as 

  First cobrand partner signed

an outsourcing partner for its strategic relationships and franchisees. 

The Company’s business portfolio includes a MasterCard-branded 

corporate card as well as TelaPoint, a provider of supply chain

software solutions for petroleum distributors and retailers, and 

Pacifi c Pride, a fuel distributor franchisee network, as well as 

international subsidiaries.

During these 25 years we have built and upgraded the functionality

of our closed loop network to have site acceptance at over 90 

percent of the nation’s retail fuel locations and over 45,000 vehicle 

maintenance locations. Our proprietary software provides fl eets 

with the security and the ability to control purchases in the fi eld, 

and delivers comprehensive information and analysis tools that

allow fl eets to effectively manage their operations and reduce 

costs. The Company’s fl eet charge cards are used by commercial 

and government fl eets to purchase fuel and maintenance services 

for approximately 4.7 million vehicles. We’re proud of every

enduring fl eet and strategic partner relationship we’ve built during 

the last 25 years, and we look forward to enhancing and

expanding these relationships in the future.

Wright Express stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock 

Exchange under the ticker symbol “WXS.”

1994

  First major Wright Express card fl eet

  accounts signed

1997

  Wright Express Financial

  Services is incorporated

2000

  MasterCard program launched

2005

  Wright Express becomes a publicly

  held, NYSE traded company

2007

  TelaPoint, a leading provider of

  browser-based supply chain

  software solutions, is acquired

2008

  Acquired Pacifi c Pride Services,

Inc., a network of franchisee

fueling sites

  Entered international markets

through acquisition of FAL, an

international provider of fuel

  card processing software

  solutions

34995_Cover   3

34995_Cover   3

3/28/09   2:16:18 AM

3/28/09   2:16:18 AM

 
 
 
 
 
2008
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

400

350

300

250
200
150

300

250

200

150
100
50

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000
950
900

‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08

‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08

‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08

TOTAL REVENUE ($ IN MILLIONS)

TOTAL FUEL TRANSACTIONS PROCESSED 
(IN MILLIONS)

MASTERCARD PURCHASES
($ IN MILLIONS)

KEY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS & RECONCILIATION OF GAAP NET INCOME

(in thousands) 

Revenue 
GAAP net income 

Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income to Adjusted Net Income1
GAAP net income 
Non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments

on derivative instruments 

Acquisition amortization 
Asset impairment charge 
Tax impact 
Adjusted Net Income 

2008 

2007 

2006

393,582 
127,640 

$ 
$ 

336,128 
51,577 

$ 
$ 

291,247
74,609

127,640 

$ 

51,577 

$ 

74,609

(90,892) 
4,854 
1,538 
31,008 
74,148 

$ 

37,074 
1,089 
— 
(13,730) 
76,010 

$ 

(32,186)
—
—
13,365
55,788

$ 
$ 

$ 

$ 

1 Adjusted Net Income for 2006, 2007 and 2008
Although adjusted net income is not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the Company considers this measure integral 
because it eliminates the non-cash volatility associated with the derivative instruments, excludes the amortization of purchased intangibles and excludes a non-cash 
asset impairment charge. In addition to evaluating the Company’s performance on a GAAP basis, management evaluates performance on a basis that excludes the 
below items because:
  • Exclusion of the non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments on derivative instruments helps management identify and assess trends in the underlying business that might
    otherwise be obscured due to quarterly and annual non-cash earnings fl uctuations associated with fuel-price derivative contracts;
  • The  non-cash,  mark-to-market  adjustments  on  derivative  instruments  are  diffi cult  to  forecast  accurately,  making  comparisons  across  historical  and  future
    quarters and years diffi cult to evaluate;
  • The amortization of purchased intangibles and asset impairment do not affect the operations of the business.

Wright Express believes that adjusted net income may also be useful to investors as one means of evaluating the Company’s performance. However, because adjusted 
net income is a non-GAAP measure, it should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, net income, operating income or cash fl ows from operating activities 
as determined in accordance with GAAP and it may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

34995_Text   1

34995_Text   1

3/19/09   1:20:51 PM

3/19/09   1:20:51 PM

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TO OUR
STOCKHOLDERS

The deteriorating economy tested our business model in 2008, 

but Wright Express remained solidly profi table, improved its cash 

fl ow and liquidity, and concluded the year well-prepared for the 

challenging environment ahead. We will continue to invest in our 

growth strategies and in our people, and I am confi dent that Wright 

Express is positioned for industry-leading performance regardless 

of the economic conditions. 

Moving Our Business Forward

“We’re making excellent progress on our 

long-term revenue diversifi cation strategy. 

We exceeded our internal goal for the front end of our business in 

2008, as the sales force added more than 600,000 new vehicles to 

We will continue to invest in our growth 

our portfolio. Three Federal agencies began using Wright Express 

strategies and in our people, and I am 

confi dent that Wright Express will be

positioned for industry-leading growth 

when the economy begins to recover.”

cards during the year, including GSA Fleet, one of the largest fl eets 

in the world. These Federal agencies expanded our portfolio by 

278,000 vehicles. At the same time, we continued to be successful in 

customer retention and customer loyalty. Voluntary attrition was 1.8 

percent for the year – substantially below our target of 3 percent. 

While 2008 was an outstanding year for new business and

customer retention, the deepening recession took its toll on our 

overall results. In the fourth quarter of 2007 we began to see fl eets 

in our existing installed base adjusting to the weakening economy 

by cutting back on the number of vehicles they operate and driving 

fewer miles. This decline in fl eet activity steadily worsened in 2008. 

Once this contraction of existing base bottoms and then begins to 

reverse, it will have a very positive impact on future results.

2

34995_Text   2

34995_Text   2

3/24/09   3:25:19 PM

3/24/09   3:25:19 PM

CONNECTING
CUSTOMERS 
THROUGH 
QUALITY
SERVICES

As a result, excluding the effect of customer additions and despite 

the low attrition, we saw accelerating erosion through 2008 in 

active vehicles served as well as gallons of fuel purchased per 

vehicle. Fueling volume in our installed base declined by 4 percent 

from 2007.

Cost Drivers

Cost control is, and will remain, a key focus for us. Early in 2008, 

with the business clearly slowing, we decided not to fi ll 60 new 

positions that we had budgeted for the year. In the third quarter 

we restructured our fi eld sales operation and streamlined other 

functions. This reorganization will generate annual savings going 

forward. We also scaled back our capital spending and reduced 

costs in other areas during the year. 

Late in 2007 we began seeing diffi culties in the collection

environment, and charge-offs increased as 2008 unfolded. Fuel 

prices rose sharply and then peaked in the fi rst half of the year, 

which elevated our receivables as more customers began facing 

liquidity challenges in the second half of the year. Our credit losses 

increased as a result of the challenging economy.

While the vast majority of our customers continue to pay Wright 

Express on time, we took a number of actions during the year 

that helped us better manage credit risk. Chief among them were 

34995_Text   3

34995_Text   3

3

3/19/09   1:20:52 PM

3/19/09   1:20:52 PM

tightening our credit standards and closely managing customer 

credit lines in light of market conditions. We also continued to 

invest in our suite of proprietary credit risk management tools. 

Diversifi cation

While managing the challenges in our core fl eet business, we 

made excellent progress on our long-term revenue diversifi cation 

strategy. The fi rst of these initiatives was MasterCard, and despite 

weakness in the online travel sector, purchase volume in our  

MasterCard business extended its record of double-digit growth 

in 2008. Another diversifi cation initiative is our WEXSmart vehicle 

telematics business. The number of partners and fl eets adopting 

WEXSmart steadily increased, and we concluded the year with 

WEXSmart posting its best quarter ever.

Our TelaPoint and Pacifi c Pride businesses, which Wright Express 

purchased in mid-2007 and early 2008, respectively, also produced 

solid results, demonstrating our potential to drive revenue in the 

fl eet and merchant markets adjacent to the fl eet card business. In 

mid-2008 we acquired the assets of Financial Automation Limited 

(FAL), a New Zealand-based provider of fuel card processing  

software solutions which we’ve rebranded, Wright Express New 

Zealand. Wright Express New Zealand now provides us with an 

international presence that we can leverage to enter new

geographic markets over the next several years. All in, our

FAL, a New Zealand-based provider of
fuel card processing solutions, which we
have renamed Wright Express New
Zealand, represents our initial foray into 
the international marketplace and will
allow us to offer fl eet card processing and 
operations solutions to major oil companies 
in geographic markets around the world.

4

34995_Text   4

34995_Text   4

3/19/09   1:20:56 PM

3/19/09   1:20:56 PM

diversifi cation plays – WEXSmart, international expansion,

TelaPoint, Pacifi c Pride and MasterCard – contributed approximately 

14% of our total increase in the fourth quarter, and we expect this 

TelaPoint set the standard for business-to-

contribution to accelerate in 2009. Wright Express generated

business applications focused exclusively on 

more than $100 million in free cash fl ow in 2008. Our ability to 

make cash acquisitions like Pacifi c Pride and FAL while also paying 

down $29 million in fi nancing debt and buying back nearly $40 

information solutions for oil companies and 

the petroleum distributor market. TelaPoint’s 

customers include more than 20,000 retail and 

wholesale fueling sites across the country, and 

million in common stock demonstrates both the power of our 

they have relationships with approximately 250 

business model and the advantage of having a healthy level of

petroleum carriers. Forward thinking marketers 

liquidity. Although the economic outlook is sobering, Wright Express 

is profi table and fi nancially strong as we begin 2009. 

use TelaPoint’s industry leading Internet software 

to successfully reduce their fuel operation costs 

and manage operations more effi ciently. 

Investing In Our Future

Our goal for the year ahead is to build on these strengths and 

maximize the results we produce even in diffi cult market conditions. 

We expect to continue meeting our ambitious targets for adding 

new vehicles and controlling attrition. MasterCard, Wright Express 

New Zealand, Pacifi c Pride, TelaPoint and WEXSmart should continue 

The U.S. fl eet fuel distributor channel represents

to drive new and growing streams of revenue. The Company will 

an important strategic growth opportunity for 

see a full year’s benefi t from the three Federal agency fl eets as well 

as growth from the large new portfolio we expect to be adding with 

Citi. And we will continue to pursue opportunities to take costs out 

of the business and improve the credit quality of our portfolio.

Wright Express. Pacifi c Pride’s distributor value 

proposition, which includes strong industry 

relationships, exceptional security and outstanding 

reporting capabilities, is a great strategic fi t for us. 

In 2008 Pacifi c Pride was named one of the 25

franchise high performers by the Wall Street Journal.

Our fi rst
Our fi rst diversifi cation play was MasterCard. Purchase volume 

on our M
on our MasterCard was up 30% in 2008 and this channel is 

continui
continuing to grow because our sales reps continue to identify 

new sou
new sources of spend at existing customers.

34995_Text   5

34995_Text   5

5

3/19/09   1:20:59 PM

3/19/09   1:20:59 PM

On behalf of the entire Wright Express team, thank you for the

confi dence you have placed in the Company’s future and in us.

We are committed to rewarding your trust in the years ahead. 

Sincerely,

Michael E. Dubyak

Chairman and Chief Executive Offi cer

March 16, 2009

 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Except for the historical information and discussions contained herein, statements contained in this annual report 

may  constitute  “forward-looking  statements”  within  the  meaning  of  the  Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform 

Act of 1995. Achieving the results described in these statements involves a number of risks, uncertainties, and 

other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, as discussed in Wright Express’ fi lings with the

Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the attached Form 10-K.

6

34995_Text   6

34995_Text   6

3/19/09   1:21:08 PM

3/19/09   1:21:08 PM

Performance Graph

The following graph assumes $100 invested on February 16, 2005, the date of the Company’s IPO, and compares (a) the percentage 
change in the Company’s cumulative total stockholder turn on the common stock (as measured bydividing (i) the sum of (A) the 
cumulative amount of dividends, assuming dividend reinvestment, during the period commencing February 16, 2005, and ending on 
December 31, 2008, and (B) the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the periods presented by 
(ii) the share price at the beginning of the periods presented) with (b) (i) the Russell 2000 Index and (ii) the S&P 500® Data Processing & 
Outsourced Services.

Total Return Performance

Wright Express Corporation

Russell 2000

S&P Data Processing and
Outsourced Services

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

e
u
l
a
V
x
e
d
n

I

40
02/16/05

06/30/05

12/31/05

06/30/06

12/31/06

06/30/07

12/31/07

06/30/08

12/31/08

Period Ending

Index
100.00
Wright Express Corporation
Russell 2000
100.00
S&P Data Processing and Outsourced Service 100.00

02/16/05 06/30/05 12/31/05 06/30/06 12/31/06 06/30/07 12/31/07 06/30/08 12/31/08
73.68
182.28
82.17
126.08
89.43
125.44

207.54
124.11
128.05

200.41
134.21
137.54

128.65
106.52
113.67

145.03
112.47
123.38

168.07
115.27
114.99

108.01
100.60
101.77

Copyright © 2008  SNL Financial LC. All rights reserved

 
34995_Text   2

34995_Text   2

3/28/09   2:22:58 AM

3/28/09   2:22:58 AM

UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 10-K 

 (Mark One) 
(cid:59) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 

OR

(cid:133) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from 

to

Commission file number  001-32426 

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization) 

97 Darling Avenue 
South Portland, Maine
(Address of principal executive offices) 

01-0526993 
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification No.) 

04106 
(Zip Code) 

(207) 773-8171 
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class 

Name of each exchange on which registered 

Common Stock, $0.01 par value 

New York Stock Exchange 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None 
(Title of class) 

 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 

(cid:133)   Yes 

(cid:59)   No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 

(cid:133)   Yes 

(cid:59)   No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

(cid:59)   Yes 

(cid:133)   No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not 

contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
(cid:59)         
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller 
reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of 
the Exchange Act. (Check one): 

Large accelerated filer  (cid:59)

Accelerated filer  (cid:133)

Non-accelerated filer  (cid:133)
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company  (cid:133)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). 

(cid:133)   Yes 

(cid:59)   No 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming for the
purpose of this calculation, but without conceding, that all directors, officers and any 10 percent or greater stockholders are affiliates 
of the registrant) as of June 30, 2008, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
was $955,847,993 (based on the closing price of the registrant's common stock on that date as reported on the New York 
Stock Exchange). 

There were 38,256,773 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of February 20, 2009. 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference 

in Part III. 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Forward-Looking Statements 

Business
Risk Factors 
Unresolved Staff Comments 
Properties 
Legal Proceedings 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data 
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 
Controls and Procedures 
Other Information 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 
Executive Compensation 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 
Principal Accounting Fees and Services 

Part I 

Item 1. 
Item 1A. 
Item 1B. 
Item 2. 
Item 3. 
Item 4. 

Part II 

Item 5. 
Item 6. 
Item 7. 
Item 7A. 
Item 8. 
Item 9. 
Item 9A. 
Item 9B. 

Part III 

Item 10. 
Item 11. 
Item 12. 
Item 13. 
Item 14. 

Part IV 

Item 15. 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 

Signatures 

Page

1

1
9
14
14
14
14

15
16
17
33
35
71
71
71

72
72
72
72
72

73

76

34995_Text   2

34995_Text   2

3/28/09   2:22:58 AM

3/28/09   2:22:58 AM

All references to "we," "us," "our," "Wright Express," or the "Company," in the Annual Report on Form 10-K mean 

Wright Express Corporation and all entities owned or controlled by Wright Express Corporation, except where it is clear that the
term means only Wright Express Corporation. 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for statements that are forward-looking and are 
not statements of historical facts. The "Outlook for the Future" section of this Annual Report in Item 7, among other sections, contains 
forward-looking statements. Any other statements that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking
statements. When used in this Annual Report, the words "may," "will," "could," "anticipate," "plan," "continue," "project," "intend," 
"estimate," "believe," "expect" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-
looking statements contain such words. Forward-looking statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions 
and are not historical facts and accordingly involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause the 
actual results or performance to be materially different from future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-
looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report, in press releases and in oral statements made by our authorized officers:  fuel 
price volatility; financial loss if we determine it necessary to unwind our derivative instrument position prior to the expiration of the 
contract; our failure to maintain or renew key agreements; failure to expand our technological capabilities and service offerings as 
rapidly as our competitors; the actions of regulatory bodies, including bank regulators; the uncertainties of litigation, as well as other 
risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A of this Annual Report. Our forward-looking statements and these factors do not reflect the 
potential future impact of any merger, acquisition or disposition. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the 
initial filing of this Annual Report and undue reliance should not be placed on these statements. We disclaim any obligation to update 
any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 

PART I 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS 

Our Company 

Wright Express Corporation, founded in 1983, is a leading provider of payment processing and information management 
services to the United States commercial and government vehicle fleet industry. We provide our services in the United States, Canada, 
New Zealand and Australia. We market our services directly, as well as through more than 140 strategic relationships which include 
major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle maintenance providers. We also offer a MasterCard-branded corporate card.  

On February 16, 2005, Wright Express LLC converted into Wright Express Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and 
100 percent of the ownership interests in Wright Express LLC were converted into 40 million shares of common stock and 100 shares
of non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock. On the same day, our former corporate parent sold all 40 million shares of 
common stock in an initial public offering ("IPO") and all 100 shares of non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock in a
private placement. 

Our wholly owned banking subsidiary, Wright Express Financial Services Corporation ("FSC"), a Utah industrial bank, was 

established in 1998. FSC approves the customer applications and owns the customer relationships for most of our fuel and 
maintenance programs and offers our MasterCard-branded corporate payment solution. Wright Express Canada Ltd. ("WEXCanada") 
was incorporated in January 2007 as a wholly owned subsidiary of FSC to assist us in funding transactions with Canadian companies. 

In addition to the companies described above, we have expanded our business through the acquisition of the following entities: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

We acquired TelaPoint, Inc. ("TelaPoint") on August 6, 2007. TelaPoint is a provider of browser-based supply chain 
software solutions for bulk petroleum distributors, retailers and fleets. 

We acquired the net assets of Pacific Pride Services, Inc. and converted it into Pacific Pride Services, LLC ("Pacific 
Pride") on February 29, 2008. Pacific Pride is an independent fuel distributor franchisee network, encompassing more 
than 340 independent fuel franchisees. 

We acquired the net assets of Financial Automation Limited, a provider of fuel card processing software solutions 
located in New Zealand, on August 29, 2008. Concurrent with the acquisition of Financial Automation Limited, we 
established a structure for international operations ("Wright Express International"). 

1

We have created one of the largest proprietary payment processing networks in the United States. We collect a broad array of 
information at the point of sale including the amount of the expenditure, the identity of the driver and vehicle, the odometer reading, 
the identity of the fuel or vehicle maintenance provider and the items purchased. We use this information to provide customers with 
purchase controls and analytical tools to help them effectively manage their vehicle fleets and control costs. We deliver value to our 
customers by providing customized offerings with accepting merchants, processing payments and providing unique information 
management services to our fleets. 

For more than 20 years we have built our network and now have site acceptance at over 90 percent of the nation's retail fuel 

locations and over 45,000 vehicle maintenance locations. This network, which is deployed at fuel and maintenance locations that use 
our proprietary software, is referred to as "closed loop" because we have a direct contractual relationship with the merchant and the 
fleet; only Wright Express transactions can be processed in this network. 

In addition to our closed loop retail fuel and vehicle maintenance network, we also issue corporate MasterCard products. These 

product offerings allow Wright Express to be a single source for all of a company's payment processing and purchasing information
management needs. 

Our Company is organized under two segments, Fleet and MasterCard. The Fleet segment is the primary focus of our business, 

representing 93 percent of total revenue. The Fleet segment of our business provides customers with payment processing services
specifically designed for the needs of vehicle fleet industries. Revenue is earned primarily from payment and transaction processing, 
of which the majority is payment processing revenue. Additionally, we earn revenue in this segment from account servicing fees and 
financing fees. The MasterCard segment of our business provides customers with a payment processing solution for their corporate
purchasing and transaction monitoring needs. 

Strategy 

Our strategy is to leverage our core competitive strengths – sales and marketing, portfolio management, customer service and 

product differentiation – to acquire and retain customers and to create products that add value by satisfying new and existing 
customers' needs. 

Our strategic initiatives include: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Increase market share.   We intend to leverage our proprietary network and our knowledge of the industry to increase 
our share in the marketplace. We expect to utilize existing and new marketing channels, along with additional 
outsourced strategic relationships and added product features including but not limited to web-based account 
management and distributor-specific product offerings. 

Leverage our existing customer base and cross-sell our products.  We have approximately 290,000 customers. We 
will continue to leverage this existing customer base by cross-selling our products to them. These cross-selling 
opportunities include, but are not limited to, the supply chain software offered by our TelaPoint subsidiary and our 
vehicle-based telematics offering, which we refer to as WEXSmartTM.

Penetrate international markets.  We have over 20 years of experience as a provider of payment and transaction 
processing services in the United States fleet industry. We expect to draw on this experience, along with our existing 
industry relationships and brand recognition, to grow our international presence initially through our investment in 
Financial Automation Limited. 

2

Products and Services 

Payment processing

FLEET SEGMENT 

In a payment processing transaction we pay the purchase price for the fleet customer's transaction, less the payment processing
fees we retain, to the fuel or vehicle maintenance provider, and we collect the total purchase price from the fleet customer, most often 
within one month from the billing date. Payment processing fees are typically based on a percentage of the aggregate dollar amount of 
the customer's purchase; however, the fees may also be based on a fixed amount charged per transaction or on a combination of both 
measures. In 2008, we had approximately 216 million payment processing transactions. 

Transaction processing

In a transaction processing transaction we earn a fixed fee per transaction. We processed nearly 61 million transaction 

processing transactions in 2008 for fleet customers. 

Information management

We provide standard and customized information to customers through monthly vehicle analysis reports, custom reports and 
our website, WEXOnline®. We also alert the customer to any unusual transactions or transactions that fall outside of pre-established 
parameters. Customers can access their account information, including account history and recent transactions, and download the
details. In addition, through WEXOnline®, fleet managers can elect to be notified by email when limits are exceeded in specified 
purchase categories, including limits on transactions within a time range and gallons per day. Utilizing our WEXSmartTM product 
which leverages telematics, automobile systems that combine global positioning satellite tracking and other wireless technology, fleet 
managers can track the movements of their drivers and the locations of their vehicles. 

Account management 

We provide the following account management services: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Customer service, account activation and account retention.  We offer customer service, account activation and 
account retention services to fleets, strategic relationships and the fuel and vehicle maintenance providers on our 
network. Our services include promoting the adoption and use of our products and programs and account retention 
programs. 

Authorization and billing inquiries and account maintenance.  We handle authorization and billing questions, account 
changes and other issues for fleets through our dedicated customer contact center, which is available 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week. Fleet customers also have self service options available to them through WEXOnline®.

Premium fleet services.  We assign designated account managers to businesses and government agencies with large 
fleets. These representatives have in-depth knowledge of both our programs and the operations and objectives of the 
fleets they service. 

Credit and collections services.  We have developed proprietary account approval, credit management and fraud 
detection programs. Our underwriting model produces a proprietary score, which we use to predict the likelihood of an 
account becoming delinquent within 12 months of activation. We also use a credit line maintenance model to manage 
ongoing accounts, which allows us to predict the likelihood of account delinquency over an on-going 18 month time 
horizon. We have developed a collections scoring model that we use to rank and prioritize past due accounts for 
collection activities. We also employ fraud specialists who monitor, alert and provide case management expertise to 
minimize losses and reduce program abuse. 

Merchant services.  Our representatives work with fuel and vehicle maintenance providers to enroll them in our 
network, certify all network and terminal software and hardware, and train them on our sale, transaction authorization 
and settlement processes. 

3

Marketing Channels 

United States 

We market our payment processing and information management services to fleets directly and indirectly. Our experienced 

inside and outside sales forces and our marketing team, which has expertise in direct marketing, database analysis and marketing
strategy and execution, drive our sales and marketing efforts. We also utilize industry tradeshows, advertising and other awareness 
campaigns to market our services. By collecting and analyzing customer data acquired for more than 20 years, we have created a 
detailed profile of representative fleet customers and have also developed a proprietary database that allows us to better market to the 
fleet industry. We provide market opportunity analyses, customer acquisition models and detailed marketing plans to our sales force
and the sales forces of companies with which we have co-branded, affinity, distributor or private label relationships. 

Direct

We market our services, branded with the Wright Express name, directly to commercial and government vehicle fleets, which 

allows us to have a direct relationship with our fleet customers. These direct customers include fleets of all sizes and vehicle
categories. We use our inside sales force to attract small fleets, such as contracting, landscaping and plumbing businesses. Our mid-
size fleet customers are typically regional businesses, such as dairies, beverage companies and grocery chains. We use our outside 
sales force to market to these customers. Our large fleet customers consist of national and large regional fleets. In marketing our 
services to these customers, we emphasize our ability to offer national site acceptance, a high level of customer service, and on-line 
tools to monitor, control and customize their fleet management capabilities. To attract and retain large fleet customers, we use both 
our outside sales force, which focuses on the acquisition of new customers, and internal account managers, who focus on servicing 
and growing revenue from existing customers. 

Indirect

We market our services indirectly through co-branded, affinity, distributor and private label relationships. 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Co-branded.  Through our co-branded relationships, we market our services for, and in collaboration with, fleet 
management companies, automotive manufacturers, fuel providers and convenience store chains using their brand 
names and our Wright Express logo. These companies seek to offer our payment processing and information 
management services to their fleet customers. 

We use our co-branded relationships to reach all sizes of fleet customers. We are able to expand the base of customers 
to whom we provide our services by combining the marketing and sales efforts of our own sales force with the efforts 
of the sales forces of our co-branded partners. 

Affinity.  Similar to the co-branded relationships, our affinity relationships are marketed in collaboration with fuel 
providers and convenience store chains. The services we deliver are designed to foster loyalty to the fuel provider or 
convenience store chain as the program is marketed as their own. However, these products allow for the same level of 
payment processing and information management services as are received by the companies using our co-branded 
programs. 

Distributor.  Through our distributor relationships, we market our services via a network of independent Pacific Pride 
fuel franchisees. Franchisees issue their own Pacific Pride commercial fueling cards to fleet customers. Vehicles in 
this program have access to fuel at Pacific Pride and strategic partner locations in the United States and Canada. We 
increase penetration to these customers by leveraging Pacific Pride's local market presence and brand recognition, as 
well as its platform and products for commercial and government fleets. We also service distributors through the 
Wright Express Distributor program, which provides fuel merchants with payment processing and information 
management services for their own fleets. 

Private Label.  We market our services for, and in collaboration with, fuel retailers, using only their brand names. The 
fuel retailers with which we have formed strategic relationships offer our payment processing and information 
management services to their fleet customers in order to establish and enhance customer loyalty. These fleets use these 
services to purchase fuel at locations of the fuel retailer with whom we have the private label relationship. Private label 
customers are typically small fleets. The fleet drivers often do not travel beyond a defined geographic area and are not 
unduly burdened by limiting their fuel purchases to the fuel locations of a particular fuel retailer within that area. We 
primarily rely on the marketing efforts of our private label relationships to attract customers; however, many of these 
fuel retailers also rely on our sales and marketing expertise to further their efforts. 

4

International 

Internationally, we intend to develop fuel card processing software solutions to give us a presence that we can leverage in select

geographic markets around the world. Our experience with the major oil companies in the Unites States and Canada has led us to 
conclude that major oil companies are often managing their fleet specific payment processing and information management service
offerings on a more global basis. 

We seek to develop long term relationships with oil companies, in order to increase the overall portfolio value through an 

outsourced payment processing and information management solution. We intend to provide implementation of a best-in-class 
application and technological offering. The value proposition that Wright Express International offers is based on the benefits and 
value it delivers in satisfying the oil companies' strategic objectives, including improved market effectiveness, cost efficiency and 
minimizing solution risks. 

Products and Services 

Corporate charge card

MASTERCARD SEGMENT 

Our corporate MasterCard charge card product provides commercial travel and entertainment and purchase capabilities to 

businesses in industries that can utilize our information management functionality. The MasterCard product can be sold jointly with 
the fleet card product to offer a total corporate payment solution to companies. 

Single use account

Our single use account MasterCard service allows businesses to centralize purchasing, simplify complex supply chain processes 

and eliminate the paper check writing associated with traditional purchase order programs. Our single use account service is used for 
transactions where no card is presented, that is, transactions conducted over the telephone, by mail, facsimile or on the Internet. They 
also can be used for transactions that require pre-authorization, such as hotel reservations. Under this program, each transaction is 
assigned a unique MasterCard account number. The unique account number makes limiting purchase amounts, tracking, settling and 
reconciling purchases easier and eliminates the risks associated with using multiple cards. 

Marketing Channels 

We market our MasterCard-branded corporate payment solutions directly to our customers in conjunction with our fleet 
offerings. We leverage the marketing and advertising efforts of MasterCard Inc. Our corporate MasterCard products are marketed to 
commercial and government organizations. 

Fuel Price Derivatives 

OTHER ITEMS 

A significant portion of our total revenues result from fees paid to us by fuel and vehicle maintenance providers based on a 

negotiated percentage of the purchase price paid by customers. Because our customers primarily purchase fuel, our revenues are 
largely dependent on retail fuel prices, which are prone to significant volatility. 

We own fuel price sensitive derivative instruments to manage the impact of volatility in fuel prices on our cash flows and 
enhance the visibility and predictability of future cash flows. We have entered into put and call option contracts ("Options") based on 
the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline and retail price of diesel fuel. When entering into the Options, our intent is to effectively lock 
in a range of prices during any given quarter on a portion of our forecasted earnings subject to fuel price variations. The contracts
contain monthly settlement provisions. Historically, we have estimated the effect on our forecasted earnings exposure associated with 
changes in fuel prices and entered into derivative agreements designed to cover 90 percent of this estimated impact. We have reduced 
this percentage to approximately 80 percent for instruments which will start to settle in 2010. For the portion of 2010 that we have 
entered into Options, we have achieved approximately 50 percent of the full year's target.  We have temporarily suspended new 
purchases of instruments under the program. Our reentry point will be reviewed on a quarterly basis. Differences between the indices
underlying the Options and the actual retail prices may create a disparity between the actual revenues we earn and the gains or losses 
realized on the Options. 

5

Our derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") 

No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly, gains and losses on our fuel price sensitive 
derivative instruments, whether they are realized or unrealized, affect our current period earnings. 

The following table presents information about the Options as of December 31, 2008: 

Percentage

(a)

Weighted-Average Price
Ceiling

Floor

(b)

For the period January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009 
For the period April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009 
For the period July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 
For the period October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 
For the period January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 
For the period April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 
For the period July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 

90% $
90% $
90% $
90% $
80% $
53% $
27% $

2.58
2.67
2.86
3.02
3.25
3.34
3.60

$
$
$
$
$
$
$

2.64
2.73
2.92
3.08
3.31
3.40
3.66

(a) Represents the estimated percentage of the Company's forecasted earnings subject to fuel price variations at the time of purchase.
(b) Weighted-average price is the Company's estimate of the retail price equivalent of the underlying strike price of the fuel price derivatives. 

The Options limit the impact fuel price fluctuations have on our cash flows. The Options that we have entered into: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Create a floor price.  When the current month put option contract settles, the Company receives cash payments from 
the counterparties of the Options when the average price for the current month (as defined by the option contract) is 
below the strike price of the put option contract. 

Create a ceiling price.  When the current month call option contract settles, the Company makes cash payments to the 
counterparties of the Options when the average price for the current month (as defined by the option contract) is above 
the strike price of the call option contract. 

Have no cash impact.  When the current month put and call option contracts settle and the average price for the current 
month (as defined by the option contract) is between the strike price of the put option contract and the strike price of 
the call option contract, no cash is exchanged between the Company and the counterparties of the Options. 

Employees 

As of December 31, 2008, Wright Express Corporation and its subsidiaries had 703 employees, 684 were located in the United 

States. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. 

Competition 

We have a strong competitive position in our Fleet segment. Our product features and extensive account management services 

are key factors behind our leadership position in the fleet industry. We face considerable competition in both of our operating
segments. Our competitors vie with us for prospective direct fleet customers as well as for companies with which we form strategic 
relationships. We compete with companies that perform payment and transaction processing or similar services. Financial institutions 
that issue Visa, MasterCard and American Express credit and charge cards currently compete against us primarily in the small fleet
category of our Fleet segment and in the corporate charge card category of our MasterCard segment. 

The most significant competitive factors are breadth of features, functionality, servicing capability and price. For more 

information regarding risks related to competition, see the information in Item 1A, under the heading "Our industry has become 
increasingly competitive, which makes it more difficult for us to maintain profit margins at historical levels." 

6

Technology 

Our proprietary software captures comprehensive information from the more than 180,000 fuel and maintenance locations 

within our network. Operating a proprietary network not only enhances our value proposition; it enables us to avoid dependence on 
third-party processors and to respond rapidly to changing customer needs with system upgrades and new specifications. Our 
infrastructure has been designed around industry-standard architectures to reduce downtime in the event of outages or catastrophic 
occurrences.  

We are continually improving our technology to enhance the customer relationship and to increase efficiency and security. We 
also review technologies and services provided by others in order to maintain the high level of service expected by our customers. For 
information regarding technology related risks, see the information in Item 1A under the headings "Our failure to effectively 
implement new technology could jeopardize our position as a leader in our industry," and "We are dependent on technology systems
and electronic communications networks managed by third parties, which could result in our inability to prevent service disruptions." 

Intellectual Property 

We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions and 
other similar measures to protect proprietary information and technology used in our business. We generally enter into confidentiality
or license agreements with our consultants and corporate partners, and generally control access to and distribution of our technology, 
documentation and other proprietary information. Despite the efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may
attempt to copy or otherwise obtain the use of our products or technology that we consider proprietary and third parties may attempt to 
develop similar technology independently. We pursue registration and protection of our trademarks primarily in the United States.

Regulation 

The Company and FSC are subject to certain state and federal laws and regulations governing insured depository institutions 

and their affiliates. FSC is subject to supervision and examination by both the Utah Department of Financial Institutions and the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company and FSC are also subject to certain restrictions on transactions with affiliates
set forth in the Federal Reserve Act ("FRA"). The Company is subject to anti-tying provisions in the Bank Holding Company Act. 
State and Federal laws and regulations limit the loans FSC may make to one borrower and the types of investments FSC may make. 

Set forth below is a description of the material elements of the laws, regulations, policies and other regulatory matters affecting 

Wright Express. 

Restrictions on intercompany borrowings and transactions

The FRA restricts the extent to which the Company may borrow or otherwise obtain credit from, sell assets to or engage in 

certain other transactions with FSC. In general, these restrictions require that any such extensions of credit by FSC to the parent 
company must be fully secured. There is no limit on such transactions to the extent they are secured by a cash deposit or pledged 
United States government securities. It is also possible to pledge designated amounts of other specified kinds of collateral if the 
aggregate of such transactions are limited to 10 percent of FSC's capital stock and surplus with respect to any single affiliate and to 
20 percent of FSC's capital stock and surplus with respect to all affiliates. 

Restrictions on dividends

The FRA also limits the dividends FSC may pay to the Company. In addition, FSC is subject to various regulatory policies and 
requirements relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain capital above regulatory minimums. A state or 
federal regulatory authority can determine, under certain circumstances relating to the financial condition of a bank, that the payment 
of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice and can prohibit payment. FSC may not pay a dividend to us if it is 
undercapitalized or would become undercapitalized as a result of paying the dividend. Utah law permits an industrial bank to pay
dividends only from undivided earnings. 

Company obligations to FSC

Any non-deposit obligation of FSC to the Company is subordinate, in right of payment, to deposits and other indebtedness of 

FSC. In the event of the Company's bankruptcy, any commitment by the Company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the
capital of FSC will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment. 

7

Restrictions on ownership of Wright Express common stock

FSC, and therefore the Company, is subject to bank regulations that impose requirements on entities that control 10 percent or 

more of Wright Express common stock. These requirements are discussed in detail in Item 1A under the heading "If any entity 
controls 10 percent or more of our common stock and such entity has caused a violation of applicable banking laws by its failure to 
obtain any required approvals prior to acquiring such common stock, we will have the power to restrict such entity's ability to vote 
such shares." 

Segments and Geographic Information 

For an analysis of financial information about our segments as well as our geographic areas, see Item 8 – Note 21 of our 

consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

Available Information 

The Company's principal executive offices are located at 97 Darling Avenue, South Portland, ME 04106. Our telephone 
number is (207) 773-8171, and our Internet address is http://www.wrightexpress.com. The Company's annual, quarterly and current 
reports, proxy statements and certain other information filed with the SEC, as well as amendments thereto, may be obtained free of 
charge from our web site. These documents are posted to our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we have filed or 
furnished these documents with the SEC. These documents are also available at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, 
NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company's Audit Committee Charter, Compensation 
Committee Charter, Governance Committee Charter, Corporate Governance Guidelines and codes of conduct are available without 
charge through the "Corporate Governance" portion of the Investor Relations page of the Company's web site, as well. 

Copies will also be provided, free of charge, to any stockholder upon written request to Investor Relations at the address above

or by telephone at (866) 230-1633. 

The Company's Internet site and the information contained therein are not incorporated into this Form 10-K. 

Certifications 

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have provided the certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the 

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K. In addition, an annual Chief Executive
Officer certification was submitted by our Chief Executive Officer to the New York Stock Exchange on June 8, 2008, in accordance
with the New York Stock Exchange's listing requirements. 

8

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 

The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Other events that we do not currently anticipate or

that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Relating to Our Company 

The majority of our revenues are related to the dollar amount of fuel purchased by our customers, and, as a result, 
volatility in fuel prices could have an adverse effect on our payment processing revenues. 

In 2008, approximately 69 percent of our total revenues were attributable to fees paid to us by fuel and vehicle maintenance 

providers based on a negotiated percentage of the purchase price paid by our customers. Our customers primarily purchase fuel. 
Accordingly, our revenues are largely dependent on fuel prices, which are prone to significant volatility. For example, we estimate 
that during 2008, a 10 cent decline in average fuel prices below average actual prices would have resulted in approximately a 
$9.0 million decline in 2008 revenue. We have benefited from historically high fuel prices during 2006, 2007 and part of 2008. 
Declines in the price of fuel could have a material adverse effect on our total revenues. 

Fuel prices are dependent on several factors, all of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others: 

(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)

supply and demand for oil and gas, and expectations regarding supply and demand; 
actions by major oil exporting nations; 
political conditions in other oil-producing and gas-producing countries, including insurgency, terrorism or war; 
refinery capacity; 
weather; 
the prices of foreign exports and the availability of alternate fuel sources; 
general worldwide economic conditions; and 
governmental regulations and tariffs. 

Derivative transactions may not adequately stabilize our cash flows and may cause volatility in our earnings. 

Because the majority of our revenues are subject to fuel price volatility, we utilize fuel price sensitive derivative instruments to 

manage our exposure to this volatility by seeking to limit fluctuations in our cash flows. For a more detailed discussion of these
derivative instruments see our "Fuel Price Derivatives" discussion in Item 1. These instruments may expose us to the risk of financial 
loss if, for example, the counterparties fail to perform under the contracts governing those arrangements, we unwind our position 
before the expiration of the contract or there is a significant change in fuel prices. The success of our fuel price derivatives program 
depends upon, among other things, our ability to forecast the amount of fuel purchased by fleets using our services. To the extent our 
forecasts are inaccurate these derivative contracts may be inadequate to protect us against significant changes in fuel prices or over-
expose us to fuel price volatility. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on these contracts will be recorded each quarter to reflect 
changes in the market value of the underlying contracts. As a result, our quarterly net income may be prone to significant volatility.

In an increasing interest rate environment, interest expense on the variable rate portion of our borrowings on our credit 
facility would increase and we may not be able to replace our maturing certificates of deposit with new certificates of 
deposit that carry the same interest rates. 

We had $170.6 million of indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2008, under our credit agreement, of which $65.6 million 
bears interest at rates that vary with changes in overall market interest rates. Rising interest rates would result in reduced net income. 

The certificates of deposit that our industrial bank subsidiary uses to finance payments to major oil companies carry fixed rates

from issuance to maturity. Upon maturity, the certificates of deposit will be replaced by issuing new certificates of deposit to the 
extent that they are needed to finance payments primarily to oil companies. In a rising interest rate environment, FSC would not be 
able to replace maturing certificates of deposit with new certificates of deposit that carry the same interest rates. Rising interest rates 
would result in reduced net income to the extent that certificates of deposit mature and need to be replaced. At December 31, 2008, 
FSC had outstanding $507.4 million in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $24.6 million in certificates of deposit 
maturing within one to five years. 

9

Our exposure to counterparty credit risk could create an adverse affect on our financial condition. 

We engage in a number of transactions where counterparty credit risk becomes a relevant factor. Specifically, we have fuel 

price derivatives and interest rate swaps whose values at any point in time are dependent upon not only the market but also the
viability of the counterparty. The failure or perceived weakness of any of our counterparties has the potential to expose us to risk of 
loss in these situations. Financial institutions, primarily banks, have historically been our most significant counterparties. The current 
instability of the financial markets has resulted in many financial institutions becoming significantly less creditworthy, and we are 
exposed to these counterparty risks. 

Our industry continues to become increasingly competitive, which makes it more difficult for us to maintain profit 
margins at historical levels. 

We face and may continue to face increased levels of competition in each category of the overall industry from several 
companies that seek to offer competing capabilities and services. Historically, we have been able to provide customers with a unique 
spectrum of services and capabilities and, therefore, we have not considered price to be the exclusive or even the primary basis on 
which we compete. As our competitors have continued to develop their service offerings, it has become increasingly more difficult for 
us to compete solely on the basis of superior capabilities or service. In some areas of our business we have been forced to respond to 
competitive pressures by reducing our fees. We have seen erosion of our historical profit margins as we use our pricing strategies to 
encourage existing strategic relationships to sign long-term contracts. If these trends continue and if competition intensifies, our 
profitability may be adversely impacted. 

While we have traditionally offered our services to all categories of the fleet industry, some of our competitors have 

successfully garnered significant share in particular categories of the overall industry. To the extent that our competitors are regarded 
as leaders in specific categories, they may have an advantage over us as we attempt to further penetrate these categories. 

We also face increased competition in our efforts to enter into new strategic relationships and renew existing strategic 

relationships on the same terms. 

Our business and operating results are dependent on several key strategic relationships, the loss of which could adversely 
affect our results of operations. 

Revenue we received from services we provided to our top five strategic relationships accounted for approximately 19 percent 

of our total revenues in 2008. Accordingly, we are dependent on maintaining our strategic relationships and our results of operations
would be lower in the event that these relationships were terminated. 

Likewise, we have agreements with the major oil companies and fuel retailers whose locations accept our payment processing 

services. The termination of any of these agreements would reduce the number of locations where our payment processing services are 
accepted; therefore, we could lose our competitive advantage and our operating results could be adversely affected. 

A decline in general economic conditions affects our revenue and adversely impacts our business.

As widely reported, financial markets and economic conditions have deteriorated in the latter half of 2008. Unfavorable 
changes in economic conditions, including declining consumer confidence, inflation, recession or other changes, may lead our 
customers, which are largely comprised of commercial fleets and corporate charge card and single use account users, to require less of 
our services as a result of declines in their businesses. These declines could result from, among other things, reduced fleet traffic, 
corporate purchasing, travel and other economic activities from which we derive revenue. These challenging economic conditions also 
may impair the ability of our customers or partners to pay for services they have purchased and, as a result, our reserve for credit 
losses and write-offs of accounts receivable could increase. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the current 
disruption in financial markets and adverse economic conditions in the United States and other countries. 

10

Decreased demand for fuel and other vehicle products and services could harm our business and results of operations. 

Our results of operations are dependent on the number of transactions we process and the dollar value of those transactions. We

believe that our transaction volume is correlated with general economic conditions in the United States. A downturn in the United
States economy is generally characterized by reduced commercial activity and, consequently, reduced purchasing of fuel and other
vehicle products and services. 

In addition, demand for fuel and other vehicle products and services may be reduced by other factors that are beyond our 
control, such as the development by vehicle manufacturers and adoption by our fleet customers of vehicles with greater fuel efficiency 
or alternative fuel sources. 

Our failure to effectively implement new technology could jeopardize our position as a leader in our industry. 

As a provider of information management and payment processing services, we must constantly adapt and respond to the 
technological advances offered by our competitors and the informational requirements of our customers, including those related to the 
Internet, in order to maintain and improve upon our competitive position. We may not be able to expand our technological capabilities 
and service offerings as rapidly as our competitors, which could jeopardize our position as a leader in our industry. 

We are dependent on technology systems and electronic communications networks managed by third parties, which could 
result in our inability to prevent service disruptions. 

Our ability to process and authorize transactions electronically depends on our ability to electronically communicate with our 
fuel and vehicle maintenance providers through point-of-sale devices and electronic networks that are owned and operated by third 
parties. The electronic communications networks upon which we depend are often subject to disruptions of various magnitudes and
durations. Any severe disruption of one or all of these networks could impair our ability to authorize transactions or collect 
information about such transactions, which, in turn, could harm our reputation for dependable service and adversely affect our results 
of operations. In addition, our ability to collect enhanced data relating to our customers' purchases may be limited by the use of older 
point-of-sale devices by fuel and vehicle maintenance providers. To the extent that fuel and vehicle maintenance providers within our 
network are slow to adopt advanced point-of-sale devices, we may not be able to offer the services and capabilities our customers
demand. 

If we fail to adequately assess and monitor credit risks of our customers, we could experience an increase in credit loss. 

We are subject to the credit risk of our customers, many of which are small to mid-sized businesses. We use various formulae 
and models to screen potential customers and establish appropriate credit limits, but these formulae and models cannot eliminate all 
potential bad credit risks and may not prevent us from approving applications that are fraudulently completed. Increases in average 
fuel prices can require us to periodically increase credit limits for a significant number of our customers. Moreover, businesses that are 
good credit risks at the time of application may become bad credit risks over time and we may fail to detect such change. In times of 
economic recession, the number of our customers who default on payments owed to us tends to increase. If we fail to adequately 
manage our credit risks, our bad debt expense could be significantly higher than it has been in the past. 

The loss or suspension of the charter for our Utah industrial bank or changes in regulatory requirements could be 
disruptive to operations and increase costs. 

FSC's bank regulatory status enables FSC to issue certificates of deposit, accept money market deposits and borrow on a federal
funds rate basis. These funds are used to support our payment processing operations, which require the Company to make payments to 
fuel and maintenance providers on behalf of fleets. FSC operates under a uniform set of state lending laws, and its operations are 
subject to extensive state and federal regulation. FSC is regulated and examined by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions on 
the state level, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the federal level. Continued licensing and federal deposit insurance 
are subject to ongoing satisfaction of compliance and safety and soundness requirements. FSC must be well capitalized and satisfy a 
range of additional capital requirements. If FSC were to lose its bank charter, Wright Express would either outsource its credit support 
activities or perform these activities itself, which would subject the Company to the credit laws of each individual state in which 
Wright Express conducts business. Furthermore, Wright Express could not be a MasterCard issuer. Any such change would be 
disruptive to Wright Express' operations and could result in significant incremental costs. In addition, changes in the bank regulatory 
environment, including the implementation of new or varying measures or interpretations by the state of Utah or the federal 
government, may significantly affect or restrict the manner in which the Company conducts business in the future. 

11

We may not be able to adequately protect the data we collect about our customers, which could subject us to liability and 
damage our reputation. 

We collect and store data about our customers and their fleets, including bank account information and spending data. Our 

customers expect us to keep this information in our confidence. We may experience attempts by experienced programmers or 
"hackers" to penetrate our network security. A party who is able to penetrate our network security could misappropriate our 
proprietary information or cause interruptions in our WEXOnline® web site. We may be required to expend significant capital and 
other resources to protect against the threat of such security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. Moreover, any 
security breach or inadvertent transmission of information about our customers could expose us to liability and/or litigation and cause 
damage to our reputation. 

We may incur substantial losses due to fraudulent use of our charge cards. 

Under certain circumstances, when we fund customer transactions, we may bear the risk of substantial losses due to fraudulent 

use of our charge cards. We do not maintain any insurance to protect us against any such losses. 

If we fail to maintain effective systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, 
we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which could cause current and potential 
shareholders to lose confidence in our financial reporting, adversely affect the trading price of our securities or harm our 
operating results. 

Effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are necessary for us to provide 

reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. Our financial reporting and 
disclosure controls and procedures are reliant, in part, on information we receive from third parties that supply information to us 
regarding transactions that we process. Any failure to develop or maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and 
disclosure controls and procedures could harm our reputation or operating results, or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. 
If we are unable to adequately maintain our internal control over financial reporting, our external auditors will not be able to issue an 
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. 

Ineffective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures could cause investors to lose 
confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities or affect our 
ability to access the capital markets and could result in regulatory proceedings against us by, among others, the SEC. In addition, a 
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, which may lead to deficiencies in the preparation of financial 
statements, could lead to litigation claims against us. The defense of any such claims may cause the diversion of management's 
attention and resources, and we may be required to pay damages if any such claims or proceedings are not resolved in our favor. Any 
litigation, even if resolved in our favor, could cause us to incur significant legal and other expenses. Such events could harm our 
business, affect our ability to raise capital and adversely affect the trading price of our securities. 

Historical transactions with our former parent company may adversely affect our financial statements. 

Historical transactions involving Avis Budget Group, Inc. (formerly Cendant Corporation), our former corporate parent, may be 

reviewed from time to time by external parties that may include, but are not limited to, former subsidiaries or operating companies of 
Avis Budget Group, Inc., as well as government regulatory organizations. The decision by one or more of these organizations to 
undertake a review is beyond our control. While management does not believe, nor has any knowledge of, any transaction that would
be in error or otherwise adjusted, corrections to the financial statements of Avis Budget Group, Inc., or its successor or its current or 
former affiliates, could adversely affect our financial statements. 

Our ability to attract and retain qualified employees is critical to the success of our business and the failure to do so may 
materially adversely affect our performance. 

We believe our employees, including our executive management team, are our most important resource and, in our industry and 

geographic area, competition for qualified personnel is intense. If we were unable to retain and attract qualified employees, our 
performance could be materially adversely affected. 

12

As we engage in acquisitions, we will incur costs and may never realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions.

We have acquired and may attempt to acquire businesses, technologies, services, products or license in technologies that we 
believe are a strategic fit with our business. We have limited experience in identifying acquisition targets, successfully completing 
proposed acquisitions and integrating any acquired businesses, technologies, services or products into our current infrastructure. The 
process of integrating any acquired business, technology, service or product may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and
expenditures and may divert significant management attention from our ongoing business operations. As a result, we will incur a
variety of costs in connection with acquisitions and may never realize their anticipated benefits.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock 

If any entity controls 10 percent or more of our common stock and such entity has caused a violation of applicable 
banking laws by its failure to obtain any required approvals prior to acquiring that common stock, we have the power to 
restrict such entity's ability to vote shares held by it. 

As owners of a Utah industrial bank, we are subject to banking regulations that require any entity that controls 10 percent or 
more of our common stock to obtain the prior approval of Utah banking authorities and the federal banking regulators. A failure to 
comply with these requirements could result in sanctions, including the loss of our Utah industrial bank charter. Our certificate of 
incorporation requires that if any stockholder fails to provide us with satisfactory evidence that any required approvals have been 
obtained, we may, or will if required by state or federal regulators, restrict such stockholder's ability to vote such shares with respect to 
any matter subject to a vote of our stockholders. 

Provisions in our charter documents, Delaware law and applicable banking law may delay or prevent our acquisition by a 
third party. 

Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and our rights plan contain several provisions that may make it more difficult for a 
third party to acquire control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions include, among other things, a 
classified board of directors, the elimination of stockholder action by written consent, advance notice for raising business or making 
nominations at meetings of stockholders and "blank check" preferred stock. Blank check preferred stock enables our board of 
directors, without stockholder approval, to designate and issue additional series of preferred stock with such special dividend,
liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights, including the right to issue convertible securities with no limitations on conversion, and 
rights to dividends and proceeds in a liquidation that are senior to the common stock, as our board of directors may determine. These 
provisions may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting common stock. We 
also are subject to certain provisions of Delaware law, which could delay, deter or prevent us from entering into an acquisition,
including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in a business
combination with an interested stockholder unless specific conditions are met. These provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a 
merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a 
premium over the market price for their common stock. 

In addition, because we own a Utah industrial bank, any purchaser of our common stock who would own 10 percent or more of 

our common stock after such purchase would be required to obtain the prior consent of Utah banking authorities and the federal 
banking authorities prior to consummating any such acquisition. These regulatory requirements may preclude or delay the purchase of 
a relatively large ownership stake by certain potential investors. 

Our stockholder rights plan could prevent you from receiving a premium over the market price for your shares of 
common stock from a potential acquirer. 

Our board of directors approved a stockholder rights plan, which entitles our stockholders to acquire shares of our common 

stock at a price equal to 50 percent of the then current market value in limited circumstances when a third party acquires 15 percent or 
more of our outstanding common stock or announces its intent to commence a tender offer for at least 15 percent of our common 
stock, in each case, in a transaction that our board of directors does not approve. The existence of these rights would significantly
increase the cost of acquiring control of our Company without the support of our board of directors because, under these limited
circumstances, all of our stockholders, other than the person or group who caused the rights to become exercisable, would become
entitled to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount. The existence of the rights plan could therefore deter potential acquirers 
and thereby reduce the likelihood that our stockholders will receive a premium for their common stock in an acquisition. 

13

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 

None. 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 

All of our facilities are leased, including our 67,000 square foot corporate headquarters in South Portland, Maine. We lease five 

smaller buildings in the South Portland area. Four of these buildings, totaling 86,000 square feet, are used for technical and customer 
service employees. The fifth building is 7,500 square feet and is our warehouse. We lease 11,500 square feet of office space in Salt 
Lake City, Utah to support our bank operations and a second call center location. We lease 4,000 square feet in Louisville, Kentucky 
to support TelaPoint. We lease 10,000 square feet of space in Salem, Oregon to support Pacific Pride, a wholly owned subsidiary of 
Wright Express. We lease 5,800 square feet of space in Auckland, NZ to support Wright Express New Zealand. These facilities are
adequate for our current use. Additional financial information about our leased facilities appears in Item 8 – Note 18 of our 
consolidated financial statements. 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

As of the date of this filing, we are not involved in any material legal proceedings. We also were not involved in any material

legal proceedings that were terminated during the fourth quarter of 2008. From time to time, we are subject to other legal proceedings 
and claims in the ordinary course of business, none of which we believe are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial 
position, results of operations or cash flows. 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three months ended December 31, 2008. 

14

PART II 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER 

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 

Market Information 

The principal market for the Company's common stock is the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and our ticker symbol is 

WXS. The following table sets forth, for the indicated calendar periods, the reported intraday high and low sales prices of the common 
stock on the NYSE Composite Tape: 

2007

First quarter 
Second quarter 
Third quarter 
Fourth quarter 

2008

First quarter 
Second quarter 
Third quarter 
Fourth quarter 

High

Low 

$
$
$
$

$
$
$
$

32.33
35.79
39.37
41.12

35.38
34.75
32.46
30.96

$
$
$
$

$
$
$
$

25.00
29.82
32.43
33.80

24.98
24.78
22.14
8.21

As of February 19, 2009, the closing price of our common stock was $13.70 per share, there were 38,256,773 shares of our 

common stock outstanding and there were 6 holders of record of our common stock. 

Dividends 

The Company has not declared any dividends on its common stock since it commenced trading on the NYSE on February 16, 
2005. The timing and amount of future dividends will be (i) dependent upon the Company's results of operations, financial condition, 
cash requirements and other relevant factors, (ii) subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company and (iii) payable 
only out of the Company's surplus or current net profits in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

The Company has certain restrictions on the dividends it may pay. If the Company's leverage ratio is higher than 1.75, the 

Company may pay no more than $10 million per annum for restricted payments, including dividends.

Share Repurchases 

The following table provides information about the Company's purchases of shares of the Company's common stock during the 

quarter ended December 31, 2008: 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased 

Average Price 
Paid per Share 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased 
as Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans or 

Programs

(a)

Approximate Dollar 
Value of Shares 
that May Yet Be 
Purchased Under 
the Plans or 
(a)
Programs

October 1 – October 31, 2008 
November 1 – November 30, 2008 
December 1 – December 31, 2008 

Total

515,400

— $
$
— $

515,400

$

—
14.82
—

14.82

515,400

— $
$
— $

80,897,847
73,258,131
73,258,131

515,400

(a) On February 7, 2007, the Company announced a share repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $75 million of its common stock over 
the next 24 months. In July 2008, our board of directors approved an increase of $75 million to the share repurchase authorization. In addition, our 
board of directors extended the share repurchase program to July 25, 2010. We have been authorized to purchase, in total, up to $150 million of our 
common stock. Share repurchases will be made on the open market and may be commenced or suspended at any time. The Company's 
management, based on its evaluation of market and economic conditions and other factors, will determine the timing and number of shares 
repurchased.

15

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

The following table sets forth our summary historical financial information for the periods ended and as of the dates indicated.

You should read the following historical financial information along with Item 7 contained in this Form 10-K and the consolidated 
financial statements and related notes thereto. The financial information included in the table below is derived from audited financial 
statements: 

(in thousands, except per share data) 

Income statement information 
Total revenues 
Total operating expenses 
Financing interest expense 
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fuel price derivatives 
Net income 
Basic earnings per share(b) 
Weighted average basic shares 
of common stock outstanding(b)

Balance sheet information, at end of period 
Total assets 
Liabilities and stockholders' or member's equity: 

All liabilities except preferred stock 
Preferred stock 
Total stockholders' or member's equity 

2008

Year ended December 31, 
2006

2005(a)

2007

2004

$
$
$
$
$
$

393,582
232,150
11,859
55,206
127,640
3.28

$
$
$
$
$
$

$
336,128
$
184,036
12,677
$
(53,610) $
$
51,577
$
1.29

$
291,247
$
156,144
14,447
$
(4,180) $
$
74,609
$
1.85

$
241,333
$
134,716
12,966
$
(65,778) $
$
18,653
$
0.46

189,100
104,940
—
—
51,219
1.27

38,885

40,042

40,373

40,194

40,185

$ 1,611,855

$ 1,785,076

$ 1,551,015

$ 1,448,295

$ 1,307,193
10,000
294,662

$ 1,570,817
10,000
204,259

$ 1,357,888
10,000
183,127

$ 1,335,682
10,000
102,613

$

$

950,503

528,439
—
422,064

Total liabilities and stockholders' or member's equity 

$ 1,611,855

$ 1,785,076

$ 1,551,015

$ 1,448,295

$

950,503

(a) 2005 includes several costs related to the IPO and the first year of being a publicly traded, stand-alone entity, which may impact the comparability to 

previous year's results. 

(b) Results for 2004 may also not be indicative as to how the Company would perform on a stand-alone basis as it was a wholly-owned subsidiary of 

Avis Budget Group, Inc. (formally Cendant Corporation). Basic earnings per share and weighted average basic shares of common stock outstanding 
are determined on a pro-forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2004, as the Company was not a publicly-traded, stand-alone entity. 

16

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF 

OPERATIONS 

2008 Highlights and Year in Review 

During 2008, we focused on customer retention, growing our customer base and minimizing cost increases. In addition, we 

added product offerings which we could cross-sell to our existing customers. We also increased our portfolio by entering into strategic
partnerships. Our results for the year ended December 31, 2008, were impacted by the following significant events, agreements, 
acquisitions and accomplishments: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

The United States economy was in a recession during 2008. Poor economic growth, low consumer sentiment and the 
adverse developments in the credit markets challenged the United States economy and credit markets. These 
challenges had a direct impact on our business as we experienced both a slower growth in volume than anticipated and 
an increase in credit losses. 

We acquired certain assets of Pacific Pride Services, Inc., a franchisor whose franchise network encompasses more 
than 340 independent fuel franchisees that issue their own Pacific Pride commercial fueling cards to fleet customers. 
These cards provide access to fuel at more than 2,300 Pacific Pride and strategic partner locations in the United States 
and Canada. The Pacific Pride network of franchisee fueling sites processes approximately 27 million fleet card 
transactions annually and generates approximately 70 percent of its revenue from transaction fees. In addition, the 
distributors in Pacific Pride's franchise network represent a cross-selling opportunity for our TelaPoint business, which 
we acquired in 2007. With products from both TelaPoint and Pacific Pride, we can provide fuel distributors with a 
comprehensive solution that spans everything from management of fuel inventory at their bulk and retail sites to 
payment processing and purchasing controls for their fleet customers. 

We acquired certain assets of Financial Automation Limited, a New Zealand-based provider of fuel card processing 
software solutions. Financial Automation Limited is an innovator in technology that meets the international fleet card 
needs of oil companies. We expect the acquisition of Financial Automation Limited to accelerate our time-to-market 
as a provider of fleet card solutions in new geographic markets worldwide. 

We amended our unsecured revolving credit facility during the second quarter of 2008. The amendment increased our 
credit line from $350 million to $450 million. We may, in the future, use amounts available under the credit agreement 
for working capital purposes, refinancing of indebtedness and other general corporate purposes. The credit facility also 
gives us the flexibility to make further acquisitions or allow us to continue to repurchase shares. 

During the fourth quarter, we began processing transactions for fleets in the Federal government's General Services 
Administration ("GSA"). We are a partner with Citi under its master contract for the GSA's SmartPay 2 program. As a 
result we added 278,000 federal fleet vehicles that have begun using our fuel purchase, vehicle maintenance and 
accident management services. We believe the real impact of this fleet will be demonstrated in the first quarter of 
2009. 

Credit losses, when we combine both the Fleet and MasterCard segments more than doubled from 2007, totaling 
approximately $45 million for 2008. In the latter half of 2008, we experienced a very difficult collection environment. 
Some of our customers experienced liquidity issues and cash flow shortages. In addition, we saw an increase in the 
number of our customers filing for bankruptcy. These factors along with record fuel prices in the third quarter 
contributed to the sharp increase in credit losses in the later part of the year. 

Total MasterCard purchase volume grew to $2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of 
30 percent over last year. Growth was primarily driven by purchase volume on our single use account service which 
helps companies manage operational spending. 

Fuel prices averaged $3.47 per gallon during 2008. Fuel prices averaged $2.84 per gallon during 2007. We 
experienced extreme volatility in our average fuel prices from an all time high of $4.34 per gallon in July to a low of 
$1.86 per gallon in December. As of December 31, 2008, the price of fuel was below the floor of all of our fuel price 
derivatives and resulted in an unrealized gain of $91 million for the year. 

17

Outlook for the Future 

Looking forward, we anticipate the following: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

We expect challenging economic conditions to continue during 2009. While we have over $700 million in accounts 
receivable at December 31, 2008, the credit we extend is not revolving. Most of our receivables are due in full within 
30 days or less. Our business focus is primarily on the processing of payments which limits our exposure to the current 
credit environment as compared to businesses which have revolving credit arrangements. We are assuming a 
continued deterioration in the economy and further declines in fuel purchasing volume. Although we plan to continue 
to sign new customers and maintain low attrition rates, we expect both of these factors to be offset by a decline in 
transaction volume within our existing customer base of approximately 10 to 15 percent. 

Our provision for credit losses is one of the most volatile expenses in our business. We tightly manage credit lines and 
monitor customer payments. In 2008 the expense nearly doubled over the prior year, partially due to the increase in 
average fuel prices. We are forecasting credit loss in our fleet segment to be between 45 to 55 basis points of payment 
processing transaction expenditures for 2009. However, the following table illustrates the potential effect a 10 basis 
point deviation from our estimates would have on our expected provision for credit losses for 2009: 

(in millions) 

Provision for credit losses 

-10 Basis 
Points

+10 Basis
Points

$

(8.0)

$

8.0

We plan to actively market our products to owners of 10 to 20 gas stations as another means for growth. Our 
acquisition of Pacific Pride will help facilitate our penetration of the distributor channel by leveraging Pacific Pride's 
local market presence and brand recognition, as well as its products for commercial vehicle fleets. 

We expect to continue to diversify our sources of revenue. We anticipate actively marketing our telematics product 
offering and the products offered by TelaPoint. We will continue to actively seek out opportunities to partner with or 
acquire other businesses which will accelerate growth and increase stockholder value. 

We intend to market fuel card processing software solutions to give us a presence that we can leverage in select 
geographic markets around the world. We seek to develop long term relationships with large oil companies currently 
operating in the international arena, in order to increase the overall portfolio value through an outsourced payment 
processing and information management solution. 

18

Results of Operations 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, AS COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our Fleet segment: 

FLEET SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Service Revenues 

Payment processing revenue 
Transaction processing revenue 
Account servicing revenue 
Finance fees 
Other

Total service revenues 

Product Revenues 

Hardware and equipment sales 

Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 

Financing interest expense 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fuel price derivatives 
(Increase) decrease in amount due to Avis under tax receivable agreement 

Income before taxes 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands, except per transaction and per gallon data) 

Key operating statistics 

Payment processing revenue: 

Payment processing transactions 
Average expenditure per payment processing transaction 
Average price per gallon of fuel 

Transaction processing revenue: 

Transaction processing transactions 

Account servicing revenue: 

Average number of vehicles serviced 

2008

2007

Increase 
(decrease)

$

$

272,501
19,339
30,573
30,716
9,902

236,629
14,452
26,697
26,509
9,053

363,031

313,340

15 % 
34 % 
15 % 
16 % 
9 %

16 % 

3,579

278

1187 % 

17 % 

27 % 

6 %

(6)%
(100)%
(203)%
(111)%

20 % 
(40)% 
158 % 

366,610

313,618

211,550

167,229

155,060

146,389

(12,677)
(1,572)
(53,610)
78,904

157,434
109,510
47,924

(11,859)
—
55,206
(9,014)

189,393
65,908
123,485

2008

216,193
69.80
3.47

$

$
$

$

$
$

2007

Increase
(decrease)

210,714
57.94
2.84

3 %
20 % 
22 % 

60,831

38,804

57 % 

4,492

4,390

2 %

Payment processing revenue increased $35.9 million for 2008, as compared to 2007. This increase is primarily due to a 
22 percent increase in the average price per gallon of fuel as well as a 3 percent increase in the number of payment processing
transactions. Unprecedented changes in the price of fuel during the course of the year, specifically during the second and third quarters 
when average fuel prices were as high as more than four dollars per gallon, drove most of the increased payment processing revenue. 
These historically high fuel prices influenced the behavior of both our customers and our merchants. In some instances as the year
progressed, we renegotiated agreements which offered higher rebates to certain customers. In other instances we renegotiated 
agreements with our merchants to change our pricing with them to include both a fixed fee component and a percentage fee 
component. The new pricing reduces the impact fuel price volatility has on our payment processing revenues. 

During 2008, our transaction processing transactions increased by 22.0 million over the prior year. The increase in revenue, as

well as the increase in transaction processing transactions, is due primarily to the acquisition of Pacific Pride during the first quarter of 
2008. 

19

The increase in account servicing revenue was primarily due to a full year of revenue from our TelaPoint subsidiary compared 

to five months in 2007 and a full year from our WEXSmartTM telematics program compared to seven months in 2007. 

Finance fees increased $4.2 million for 2008. The increase in finance fees was primarily due to higher average daily account 

receivable balances subject to late fees. These higher balances can primarily be attributed to elevated fuel prices. Offsetting the impact 
of higher average account receivable balances subject to late fees were changes in our portfolio. We found that customers who were
consistently late with their payments, and made up a core of our finance fee base, stopped paying altogether. We terminated our
relationship with these customers and charged them off as a credit loss. As this customer base declined, our provision for credit loss 
increased and our finance fees decreased. 

As a result of our Pacific Pride acquisition in the first quarter of 2008 and the growth of our WEXSmartTM telematics program, 

we have revenues from the sale of hardware and equipment. These sales have been reflected separately in the operating results. 

The following table compares selected expense line items within our Fleet segment: 

(in thousands) 

Expense

Salary and other personnel 
Service fees 
Provision for credit loss 
Depreciation and amortization 
Operating interest expense 

2008

2007

Increase 
(decrease)

$
$
$
$
$

63,899
10,669
42,971
19,483
32,148

$
$
$
$
$

62,145
6,807
19,770
14,299
31,490

3 %
57 % 
117 % 
36 % 
2 %

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Salary and other personnel expenses increased $1.8 million over last year. These expenses were approximately 
$3.6 million higher due to a full year of expense from our TelaPoint subsidiary compared to five months in 2007 and 
the addition of Pacific Pride and Wright Express International during 2008. Offsetting this increase was a reduction in 
our cash bonus of $2.5 million. 

Service fees increased $3.9 million for 2008. Professional service fees for legal and accounting work were 
approximately $3.0 million higher year over year as we incurred costs associated with an acquisition that did not 
materialize, investigated additional market opportunities and filed franchise disclosure documents on behalf of our 
Pacific Pride subsidiary. 

Provision for credit losses increased $23.2 million over last year. We measure our credit loss performance by 
calculating credit losses as a percentage of total expenditures on payment processing transactions ("Total 
Expenditures"). This metric for credit losses was 28.5 basis points of Total Expenditures for 2008 compared to 
16.3 basis points of Total Expenditures for 2007. This increase was predominantly due to higher charge-offs as a result 
of the weakening United States economy. This translated to additional credit loss expense of approximately 
$16 million. The remaining change in our credit loss expense year over year is primarily related to higher accounts 
receivable balances associated with higher fuel prices. 

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $5.2 million. The amortization associated with the intangible assets 
acquired with the August 2007 purchase of TelaPoint, the February 2008 purchase of Pacific Pride and the August 
2008 purchase of Financial Automation Limited resulted in an increase of $3.8 million. The remaining increase is 
primarily due to higher depreciation expense as a result of additional expenditures for internally-developed software. 

Operating interest expense relates to our deposits and borrowed federal funds, as well as discounts we offer for 
electronic payments. This interest expense increased $0.7 million compared to 2007. We finance the receivables 
arising from our payment processing transactions with our operating debt (deposits and borrowed federal funds). The 
average balance of our receivables, and therefore, our operating debt, was higher than prior year due to the 
exceptionally high fuel prices during 2008. Our average debt balance for 2008 totaled $664.6 million as compared to 
our average debt balance of $544.7 million for 2007. This resulted in approximately $6.4 million of additional 
operating interest. This increase in our operating interest expense due to higher average debt balances was more than 
offset by a decrease in weighted average interest rates to 4.3 percent in 2008 from 5.3 percent in 2007. The decrease in 
interest rates reduced operating interest expense year over year by approximately $6.7 million. The remaining change 
in operating interest expense is a result of an additional $1.1 million of electronic payment discounts year over year. 
This increase in discounts is also related to the higher average customer receivable balances. 

In the fourth quarter of 2008, we incurred a $1.5 million impairment charge related to partially completed internal-use software.

This non-cash charge was related to product development for the construction vertical. The impairment charge has been included in 
occupancy and equipment expense. 

20

Financing interest expense, which represents interest on our term loan and our revolving credit facility, is related primarily to 

the corporate credit facility and secondarily to the preferred stock, which under United States accounting principles is classified as 
debt that we issued as part of our initial public offering. Interest expense for 2008 decreased $0.6 million from 2007, primarily due to 
lower interest rates. 

We own fuel price sensitive derivative instruments that we purchase on a periodic basis to manage the impact of volatility in 
fuel prices on our cash flows. Our derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for 
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly, gains and losses on our fuel price sensitive derivative instruments affect 
our net income. We recognized unrealized gains of $90.9 million in 2008 compared to unrealized losses of $37.1 million in 2007. We 
recognized realized losses of $35.7 million in 2008 and $16.5 million in 2007. 

Our effective tax rate was 34.8 percent for 2008 and 69.6 percent for 2007. Our effective tax rate can fluctuate in the future due 

to changes in the mix of earnings between legal entities. Our tax rate also fluctuates due to the impacts that those rate mix changes 
have on the net deferred tax assets. The adjustments to those net deferred tax assets for rate changes can cause volatility in our 
effective tax rates. The 2008 provision for income taxes reflects a net benefit of approximately $8.9 million as a result of rate change 
impacts on the deferred tax asset balance. These rate changes also increased the associated liability to Avis, resulting in a $9.0 million 
charge to non-operating expense in the current year. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on our fuel price derivatives impact the 
amount of taxable income by state jurisdiction. As the price of fuel changes and impacts our fuel price derivatives, our effective tax 
rate fluctuates due to changes in the mix of earnings between our legal entities resulting in higher or lower effective tax rates.

The unusual 2007 rate was attributable to the State of Maine's enactment of a law which changed the State's rules for 
apportioning income related to the performance of services. The new law effectively reduced taxable income or loss allocable to the 
State of Maine which lowered our blended state income tax rate which then decreased our deferred tax assets. This resulted in a charge 
to the provision for income taxes in the second quarter of 2007 of approximately $80.9 million. The lower projected overall tax rate in 
2007, in turn, did decrease the expected benefit we will realize from the increased tax basis generated by our separation from Avis.
Accordingly, the related contractual liability to Avis recorded in connection with the tax receivable agreement decreased by 
approximately $78.9 million during the second quarter of 2007. 

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our MasterCard segment: 

MASTERCARD SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Service Revenues 

Payment processing revenue 
Account servicing revenue 
Finance fees 
Other

Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands) 

Key operating statistics 

Payment processing revenue: 

MasterCard purchase volume 

2008

2007

Increase 
(decrease)

$

$

$

24,940
58
327
1,647

26,972

20,600

6,372
2,217
4,155

$

20,864
70
376
1,200

22,510

16,807

5,703
2,050
3,653

20 % 
(17)% 
(13)% 
37 % 

20 % 

23 % 

12 % 
8 %
14 % 

2008

2007

Increase
(decrease)

$ 2,404,646

$ 1,844,506

30 % 

Payment processing revenue increased approximately $4.1 million over 2007, primarily due to additional business driven by 

new customers on our single use account service which continues to drive growth in our MasterCard segment. Our MasterCard 
purchase volume grew by over $560 million in 2008 compared to 2007. 

Operating expenses increased by $3.8 million during 2008 primarily due to the following: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Service fees increased by $1.5 million as compared to 2007 due to higher purchase volumes. 

An increase in the credit loss reserve of $1.3 million. We measure our credit loss performance by calculating credit 
losses as a percentage of total card purchases. This metric for credit losses was 8.5 basis points of total MasterCard 
purchase volume for 2008 compared to 4.0 basis points for 2007. 

21

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, AS COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our fleet segment: 

FLEET SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Revenues 

Payment processing revenue 
Transaction processing revenue 
Account servicing revenue 
Finance fees 
Other

Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 

Financing interest expense 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 
Net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price derivatives 
Decrease in amount due to Avis under tax receivable agreement 

Income before taxes 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands, except per transaction and per gallon data) 

Key operating statistics 

Payment processing revenue: 

Payment processing transactions 
Average expenditure per payment processing transaction 
Average price per gallon of fuel 

Transaction processing revenue: 

Transaction processing transactions 

Account servicing revenue: 

Average number of vehicles serviced 

$

$

$
$

2007

2006

Increase 
(decrease)

19 % 
(18)% 
12 % 
21 % 
(5)%

15 % 

18 % 

13 % 

(12)% 
—
1,183 % 
—

42 % 
174 % 
(33)% 

$

236,629
14,452
26,697
26,509
9,331

198,674
17,528
23,918
21,997
9,784

313,618

271,901

167,229

142,198

146,389

129,703

(14,447)
—
(4,180)
—

111,076
39,923
71,153

(12,677)
(1,572)
(53,610)
78,904

157,434
109,510
47,924

2007

210,714
57.94
2.84

$

$
$

2006

Increase
(decrease)

181,332
53.29
2.63

16 % 
9 %
8 % 

38,804

58,827

(34)% 

4,390

4,318

2 %

Payment processing revenue increased $38.0 million for 2007, as compared to 2006. This increase is primarily due to a 
16 percent increase in the number of payment processing transactions as well as an 8 percent increase in the average price per gallon 
of fuel. Approximately 40 percent of the growth in our payment processing transactions is primarily attributed to the conversion of the 
ExxonMobil portfolio to a payment processing program in December 2006. ExxonMobil had previously been a transaction processing 
customer. The increase in the average expenditure per payment processing transaction is attributed to the increase in the price of fuel. 

Our 2007 transaction processing transactions decreased by 20.0 million transactions from the prior year. This is primarily due 

to conversions of portfolios from transaction processing services to payment processing services. 

Finance fees increased $4.5 million for 2007, primarily due to higher average daily account receivable balances subject to late

fees. These higher balances can be attributed to both elevated fuel prices and an increase in the number of payment processing 
transactions. 

22

The following table reflects comparative expense line items within our Fleet segment: 

(in thousands) 

Expense

Salary and other personnel 
Service fees 
Provision for credit loss 
Depreciation and amortization 
Operating interest expense 

2007

2006

Increase 
(decrease)

$
$
$
$
$

62,145
6,807
19,770
14,299
31,490

$
$
$
$
$

57,506
8,000
14,848
10,796
21,667

8 %
(15)% 
33 % 
32 % 
45 % 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

During 2007 we added approximately $4.2 million in expense primarily in the sales, finance and information 
technology areas to support growth in our existing business and to facilitate new product offerings. These additional 
expenses include medical and dental insurance as well as our sales related expenses such as travel. During 2007 we 
incurred an additional $1 million in stock-based compensation expense over the prior year. This is partially offset by 
lower employee incentive expense of $0.6 million. The acquisition of TelaPoint also contributed to the increase in 
salary and other personnel expense by approximately $0.5 million. 

Credit losses were $19.8 million in 2007 as compared to $14.8 million in 2006. Credit losses were 16.3 basis points of 
Total Expenditures for 2007 compared to 15.2 basis points of Total Expenditures for 2006. The change in our credit 
loss expense year over year is primarily related to higher fuel prices and the conversion of the ExxonMobil portfolio to 
a payment processing program. These increases resulted in approximately $2.2 million of additional expense as 
compared to 2006. The ExxonMobil portfolio consists primarily of small fleets, which have historically experienced 
higher loss rates than our other portfolios. 

Service fees decreased $1.2 million for 2007. These decreases were primarily lower board of director and professional 
service fees of $1.4 million as compared to last year. During 2006 we incurred higher expenses during our exploration 
of possible acquisition targets. 

Operating interest expense, which relates to interest on our deposits and borrowed federal funds, increased 
$9.8 million compared to 2006, as we incurred interest expense to finance our receivables arising from our payment 
processing transactions. The increase in our interest expense results, in part, from an increase in weighted average 
interest rates to 5.3 percent in 2007 from 4.9 percent in 2006. In addition, our increased interest expense can be 
attributable to an increase in our average debt balance. Our average debt balance for 2007 totaled $544.7 million as 
compared to our average debt balance of $381.7 million for 2006. The average debt balance increased due to (i) higher 
average fuel prices and (ii) an increase in the number of transactions processed. 

Financing interest expense for 2007 decreased $1.8 million from 2006. The primary reason for this decline is the average 
interest rate decreased to 6.9 percent for 2007 as compared to 7.1 percent for 2006, due to lower interest rates on the new credit 
agreement. The average debt balance decreased to $180.2 million in 2007 compared to $201.6 million in 2006. The outstanding 
balance on our corporate credit facility at December 31, 2007 was $199.4 million as compared to a balance of $149.8 million on 
December 31, 2006. In August 2007 we borrowed approximately $40 million to acquire TelaPoint. 

We recognized unrealized losses of $37.1 million in 2007 compared to unrealized gains of $32.2 million in 2006 on our fuel 

price sensitive derivative instruments. We recognized realized losses of $16.5 million in 2007 and $36.4 million in 2006. 

Our effective tax rate was 69.6 percent for 2007 and 36.0 percent for 2006. On June 7, 2007, the State of Maine enacted a law 

effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2007, which changed the State's rules for apportioning income related to the 
performance of services. The new law effectively reduced taxable income or loss allocable to the State of Maine. This caused a change 
to our apportionment factors and has resulted in a significant decrease in our blended state income tax rate. The lower state income tax 
rate was applied to the cumulative temporary differences existing between the carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes and 
the amounts used for income tax purposes. The effect of this lower state income tax rate on the temporary differences decreased our 
deferred tax assets which resulted in a charge to the provision for income taxes in the second quarter of 2007 of approximately
$80.9 million. 

23

The lower overall tax rate decreased the expected benefit we will realize from the increased tax basis generated by our 
separation from Avis. Accordingly, the related contractual liability to Avis recorded in connection with the tax receivable agreement 
has decreased. This decrease resulted in non-operating income of approximately $78.9 million during the second quarter of 2007.

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our MasterCard segment: 

MASTERCARD SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Revenues 

Payment processing revenue 
Account servicing revenue 
Finance fees 
Other

Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands) 

Key operating statistics 

Payment processing revenue: 

MasterCard purchase volume 

2007

2006

Increase 
(decrease)

$

$

$

20,864
70
376
1,200

22,510

16,807

5,703
2,050
3,653

$

15,967
81
354
2,944

19,346

13,946

5,400
1,944
3,456

31 % 
(14)% 
6 %
(59)% 

16 % 

21 % 

6 %
5 %
6 %

2007

2006

Increase
(decrease)

$ 1,844,506

$ 1,300,740

42 % 

Payment processing revenue increased approximately $4.9 million over 2006, primarily due to additional business driven by 

new customers on our single use account service which continues to drive growth in our MasterCard segment. Our MasterCard 
purchase volume grew by nearly $544 million in 2007 compared to 2006. 

Other revenue decreased $1.7 million from 2006 primarily due to the sale of our shares of MasterCard Class B stock during 

2006 for a pre-tax gain of approximately $2.3 million. All of these proceeds were included in other revenues for 2006. 

Operating expenses increased by $2.9 million during 2007 due to the following: 

(cid:120) An increase in service fees of $1.7 million as compared to 2006 due to higher purchase volumes. 

(cid:120) An increase in depreciation and amortization and technology leasing and support of $1.1 million due to additions to our 

infrastructure as we grow our customer base. 

(cid:120) An increase in operating interest of $0.8 million due to a 42 percent increase in MasterCard purchase volume. 

(cid:120) Offsetting these increases was a decrease in the credit loss reserve of $1.0 million. Credit losses were 4.0 basis points of 
total MasterCard purchase volume for 2007 compared to 13.8 basis points for 2006. Our 2006 reserve includes a specific 
amount for one customer. 

24

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Cash Flows 

2008 Cash Utilization Summary

Our primary source of liquidity is management operating cash, 

which we define as cash from operations adjusted for changes in 
deposits, borrowed federal funds and purchased fleet card receivables. 
Management operating cash is not a measure in accordance with 
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). During 2008, we 
generated approximately $272.1 million in management operating cash 
as compared to approximately $53.2 million in 2007. The significant 
increase in management operating cash is largely due to an 
approximately $670 million drop in our accounts receivable balances in 
the fourth quarter of 2008. This large decrease was mainly due to 
rapidly declining fuel prices. As a result, we ended 2008 with a 
significant cash balance as maturing certificates of deposit did not keep 
pace with the declining accounts receivable balances brought on by the 
steep decrease in fuel prices. We expect our excess cash to diminish as 
approximately $230 million of certificates of deposit are scheduled to 
mature during the first quarter of 2009. 

Manage m ent 
ope rating 
cash
$272.1 

Other, net , 
$4.9 

Capital 
expenditu res
$16.1 

Share 
repurchas es
$39.0 

Acquisitio n
$41.6 

Financing  
debt, net, 
$30.4 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

During 2008, we borrowed approximately $41 million 
from our credit facility for the acquisition of Pacific 
Pride and Financial Automation Limited. During the 
fourth quarter of 2008, we used our excess cash to pay 
down approximately $30 million on our credit facility
to a balance of$170.6 million at the end of the year. 

Source of Cash

Use of Cash

(in m illions)

We used $39 million during 2008 to acquire our own common stock. 

During 2008, we had approximately $16 million of capital expenditures. A significant portion of our capital 
expenditures are for the development of internal-use computer software, primarily to enhance product features an
proximately $14 to $17 million. Our capital 
functionality. We expect total capital expenditures for 2009 to be ap
spending is financed primarily through internally generated funds. 

d 

Management Operating Cash 

We focus on management operating cash as a key element in achieving maximum stockholder value, and it is the primary 
measure we use internally to monitor cash flow performance from our core operations. Since deposits and borrowed federal fund
used to finance our accounts receivable, we believe that they are a recurring and necessary use and source of cash. As such, w
consider deposits and borrowed federal funds when evaluating our operating activities. For the same reason, we believe that 
management operating cash may also be useful to investors as one means of evaluating our performance. However, management 
operating cash is a non-GAAP measure and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, net cash provided by (used for) 
operating activities as presented on the consolidated statement of cash flows in a
ash provided by (used for) operating activities to management operating cash: 
c

ccordance with GAAP. The table below reconciles net 

s are 

e

(in thousands) 

2008

Y r en

ea

de

mber 31, 

d Dece
007
2

20

06

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 
Purchases of fleet card receivables 
Net (decrease) increase in deposits 
Net (decrease) increase in borro

wed federal funds 

Management operating cash 

$

339,1

$

79
—

(

58,943 )
(8,175 )

$

92,089)
(
)
(1,922
204,390
)
(57,221

60,449
(86,784)
56,448
26,369

$

272,061

$

53,158

$

56,482

In order to reconcile from management operating cash to the classifications of cash flow activities presented on our 

consolidated statement of cash flows, we have adjusted our cash flows from investing activities for pu
and our cash flows from financing activities for the changes in deposits and borrowed federal funds. 

rchases of fleet card receivables, 

25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our bank subsidiary, FSC, utilizes certificates of deposit to 

finance our accounts receivable. FSC issued certificates of deposit in 
various maturities ranging between three months and three years and 
with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.85 percent to 5.45 percent as of 
December 31, 2008. The interest rates on these certificates of deposit 
have lowered over the past few months. As of December 31, 2008, we 
had approximately $532.0 million of certificates of deposit outstanding 
at a weighted average rate of 3.85 percent. FSC may issue certificates 
of deposit without limitation on the balance outstanding. However, 
FSC must maintain minimum financial ratios, which include risk-based 
asset and capital requirements, as prescribed by the FDIC. As of 
December 31, 2008, certificates of deposit were in denominations of 
$250,000 or less, corresponding to the increase in the FDIC insurance 
limits to $250,000 as authorized by the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008. The certificates of deposit are only payable 
prior to maturity in the case of death or legally declared mental 
incompetence. We believe that our certificates of deposit are paying 
competitive yields and that there continues to be consumer demand for 
these instruments. 

Non-interest bearing deposits are required for certain customers 

as collateral for their credit accounts. We had $8.1 million of these 
deposits on hand at December 31, 2008. 

FSC also borrows from lines of credit on a federal funds rate 

basis to supplement the financing of our accounts receivable. Our 
outstanding federal funds lines of credit were decreased to zero during 
2008 as we had no immediate need for cash. We do, however, have 
approximately $155 million in lines of credit on a federal funds rate 
basis as of December 31, 2008. 

Short-term Liquidity 

Our short-term cash requirements consist primarily of payments 

to major oil companies for purchases made by our fleet customers, 
payments on maturing certificates of deposit, interest payments on our 
credit facility, cash payments for derivative instruments and other 
operating expenses. FSC is responsible for substantially all payments to 
major oil companies and payments on maturing certificates of deposit. 
FSC can fund our short-term cash requirements through the issuance of 
certificates of deposit and borrowed federal funds. Any remaining cash 
needs are primarily funded through operations. Under FDIC 
regulations, FSC may not pay any dividend if, following the payment 
of the dividend, FSC would be "undercapitalized," as defined under the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Act and applicable regulations. This 
restriction on dividends had no impact on our cash needs. 

2007 Cash Utilization Summary

Other, net
$2.9 

Financing 
debt, net
$47.0 

Management 
operating 
cash
$53.2 

Capital 
expenditures
$16.6 

Share 
repurchases
$37.7 

Acquisition
$40.8 

Source of Cash

Use of Cash

(in m illions)

2006 Cash Utilization Summary

Other, net
$2.6 

Investments
$15.0 

Management 
operating 
cash
$56.5 

Capital 
expenditures
$12.5 

Financing 
debt, net
$71.5 

Source of Cash

Use of Cash

(in m illions)

Our credit facility provides a $450 million revolving line-of-credit. Borrowings on the revolving line-of-credit bear interest 
equal to (a) the British Bankers Association LIBOR plus a margin of 0.45 percent to 1.125 percent based on our consolidated leverage 
ratio or (b) the higher of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50 percent or the prime rate announced by Bank of America, N.A., plus a
margin of up to 0.125 percent based on our consolidated leverage ratio. The revolving line-of-credit facility expires in May 2012. Our 
revolving credit facility had an available balance of approximately $279 million at December 31, 2008. 

Our credit agreement contains various financial covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios. Specifically, our 

credit agreement requires us to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00 at the end of each fiscal quarter until 
the maturity date. The credit agreement also requires us to maintain a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00 at 
the end of each fiscal quarter until the maturity date. 

26

In addition to the financial covenants, the credit agreement contains various customary restrictive covenants that limit our 
ability to pay dividends, sell or transfer all or substantially all of our property or assets, incur more indebtedness or make guarantees, 
grant or incur liens on our assets, make investments, loans, advances or acquisitions, engage in mergers, consolidations, liquidations or 
dissolutions, enter into sales or leasebacks and change our accounting policies or reporting practices. FSC is not subject to certain of 
these restrictions. We have been, and expect to continue to be, in compliance with all material covenants and restrictions at 
December 31, 2008. 

Our fuel price derivatives are currently in a gain position due to the extraordinary decline in oil prices during the fourth quarter 
of 2008. As a result, we have an asset related to these derivatives of approximately $49 million. The bottom end of the collar that we 
have locked in for 2009 is $0.24 higher then the bottom end we locked in for 2008. Based on a forecasted average fuel price of $1.97 
per gallon for 2009, we expect to receive significant cash gains from our fuel price derivative instruments in 2009. 

We have entered into three interest rate swap arrangements that effectively convert $105 million of variable rate borrowing to 

fixed rate borrowing at a rate of approximately 5.1 percent. These arrangements expire in 2009. 

Management believes that we can adequately fund our cash needs during the next 12 months. 

Long-term Liquidity 

Our long-term cash requirements consist primarily of amounts due to Avis as part of our tax receivable agreement. As a 
consequence of our separation from Avis, we increased the tax bases of our tangible and intangible assets to their fair market value 
(the "Tax Basis Increase"). This Tax Basis Increase allows us to reduce the amount of future tax payments to the extent that we
generate sufficient taxable income. We are contractually obligated, pursuant to our tax receivable agreement with Avis, to remit to 
Avis 85 percent of any such cash savings, subject to repayment if it is determined that these savings should not have been available to 
us. We expect to fund these payments with the cash savings realized as a result of the Tax Basis Increase. Therefore, our current and 
expected operating cash flows attributable to the Tax Basis Increase are not expected to have a significant impact on us. 

We currently have authorization from our Board to purchase up to $150 million of our common stock. Through December 31, 

2008, we have used $76.7 million of the authorized amount to acquire shares of our common stock. The program will be funded either 
through our future cash flows or through borrowings on our credit facility. Share repurchases will be made on the open market and 
may be commenced or suspended at any time. The Company's management, based on its evaluation of market and economic 
conditions and other factors, will determine the timing and number of shares repurchased. 

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements 

We have the following off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2008: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Operating leases.  We lease office space, office equipment and computer equipment under long-term operating leases, 
which are recorded in occupancy and equipment or technology leasing and support. 

Extension of credit to customers.  We have entered into commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of 
business. We had approximately $3.9 billion of commitments to extend credit at December 31, 2008, as part of 
established lending product agreements. These amounts may increase during 2009 as we extend credit to customers, 
subject to our appropriate credit reviews, as part of our lending product agreements. Many of these commitments are 
not expected to be utilized; therefore, we do not believe total unused credit available to customers and customers of 
strategic relationships represents future cash requirements. We can increase or decrease our customers' credit lines at 
our discretion at any time. We believe that we can adequately fund actual cash requirements related to these credit 
commitments through the issuance of certificates of deposit and borrowed federal funds. 

Letters of credit.  We are required to post collateral to secure our fuel price sensitive derivative instruments based on 
the unrealized loss, less any unsecured credit granted by our counter party. At December 31, 2008, we had no 
unsecured credit nor had we posted a letter of credit for collateral as these instruments were in an unrealized gain 
position. We have posted a $2.1 million letter of credit as collateral under the terms of our lease agreement for our 
corporate offices. 

27

Contractual Obligations 

The table below summarizes the estimated dollar amounts of payments under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008, 

for the periods specified: 

(in thousands) 

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013 and 
Thereafter 

Total

Operating leases:

Facilities
Equipment, including vehicles

Capitalized software licensing agreement 
Preferred stock (a)
Revolving line-of-credit (b)
Tax receivable agreement
Deposits
Interest rate swap arrangements (c)
Purchase obligations:
Accounts payable 
Technology services 

$

$

2,411
1,510
2,903
337
—
22,507
507,370
2,742

249,067
1,432

$

1,805
939
—
337
—
21,194
24,646
—

—
1,434

$

1,749
758
—
337
—
21,631
—
—

—
550

$

1,751
346
—
337
170,600
22,596
—
—

—
—

$

9,660
1
—
10,723
—
221,438
8,130
—

—
—

17,376
3,554
2,903
12,071
170,600
309,366
540,146
2,742

249,067
3,416

Total

$

790,279

$

50,355

$

25,025

$

195,630

$

249,952

$ 1,311,241

(a)  Assumes December 31, 2008, rate of 3.37% and redemption on February 22, 2015. See Item 8 – Note 13, Preferred Stock. 
(b)  Our revolving line-of-credit is set to expire in May of 2012. Amounts in table exclude interest payments. See Item 8 – Note 11, Financing Debt. 
(c) Payments on interest rate swap arrangements have been estimated using the December 31, 2008 LIBOR rates. Any change to this rate will impact 

future payments. 

28

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial 
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparation of these financial statements requires us to make 
estimates and judgments that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of 
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. We continually evaluate our judgments and estimates in 
determination of our financial condition and operating results. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other 
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates are based on information 
available as of the date of the financial statements and, accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates, sometimes 
materially. Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial 
condition and operating results and require management's most subjective judgments. Our consolidated financial statements are based 
on the selection and application of critical accounting policies and estimates, the most significant of which are included in the tables 
below. 

Reserve for Credit Losses 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

The reserve for losses relating to 
accounts receivable represents 
management's estimate of the losses 
inherent in the Company's outstanding 
portfolio of receivables. The reserve for 
credit losses reduces the Company's 
accounts receivable balances as 
reported in its financial statements to 
their net realizable value. 

Reserves for these losses are primarily 
based on a model that analyzes specific 
portfolio statistics, including average 
charge-off rates for various stages of 
receivable aging (i.e. current, 30 days, 
60 days, 90 days) over historical periods 
and average bankruptcy and recovery 
rates. Receivables are generally written 
off when they are 150 days past due or 
declaration of bankruptcy. 

Also, the reserve reflects management's 
judgment regarding overall reserve 
adequacy. Management considers 
whether to adjust the reserve that is 
calculated by the analytic model based 
on other factors, such as the actual 
charge-offs for the preceding reporting 
periods, expected charge-offs for the 
subsequent reporting periods, a review 
of accounts receivable balances which 
become past due, changes in customer 
payment patterns, known fraud activity 
in the portfolio, as well as leading 
economic and market indicators. 

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

To the extent historical credit 
experience is not indicative of future 
performance, actual loss experience 
could differ significantly from 
management's judgments and 
expectations, resulting in either higher 
or lower future provisions for credit 
losses, as applicable. 

As of December 31, 2008, we have 
estimated a reserve for credit losses 
which is 2.6 percent of the total gross 
accounts receivable balance. An 
increase to this reserve by 0.5 percent 
to 3.1 percent would increase the 
provision for credit losses for the year 
by $3.6 million. Conversely, a decrease 
to this reserve by 0.5 percent to 
2.1 percent would decrease the 
provision for credit losses for the year 
by $3.6 million. 

29

Deferred Tax Asset Valuation 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

The Company regularly reviews its 
deferred tax assets for recoverability. 
Management's determination of whether 
an allowance is required is based on 
historical taxable income or loss, 
projected future taxable income or loss, 
the expected timing of the reversals of 
existing temporary differences and the 
implementation of tax planning 
strategies. 

The Company recognizes deferred tax 
assets and liabilities based on the 
differences between the financial 
statement carrying amounts and the tax 
bases of assets and liabilities. Future 
realization of the tax benefit of existing 
deductible temporary differences is 
contingent upon the ability of the 
Company to generate sufficient future 
taxable income within the carry back 
and carry forward periods available 
under tax law. We have established a 
valuation allowance of $158,000 
against certain of our state net 
operating losses. A valuation allowance 
has been established for those state net 
operating losses that the Company 
believes it is more likely than not that 
they will not be utilized within the 
carry forward period. No other 
valuation allowances have been 
established at this time as management 
believes that it is more likely than not 
that the Company will realize the 
benefits of the other deferred tax assets. 

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

If the Company is unable to generate 
sufficient future taxable income, or if 
there is a significant change in the time 
period within which the underlying 
temporary differences become taxable 
or deductible, the Company may be 
required to establish additional 
valuation allowances against its 
deferred tax assets. 

At December 31, 2008, the Company 
had approximately $372 million of 
gross deferred tax assets. These 
deferred tax assets consisted primarily 
of temporary differences related to tax 
deductible goodwill. The Company also 
had gross deferred tax liabilities of 
approximately $132 million primarily 
consisting of temporary non-tax 
deductible goodwill with an indefinite 
reversal period. 

A determination that no deferred tax 
assets would be realized at 
December 31, 2008, would require the 
establishment of additional valuation 
allowances determined without regard 
to existing deferred tax liabilities with 
indefinite reversal periods. This would 
increase the provision for income taxes 
by approximately $340 million. 
However, under the terms of the tax 
receivable agreement with Avis, to the 
extent that the Company was unable to 
utilize the tax benefits created as a 
consequence of the Company's 
separation from Avis, the Company 
would realize a gain of approximately 
$309 million. Therefore, a valuation 
allowance against 100% of our deferred 
tax assets coupled with a like judgment 
concerning the likelihood of the 
payment of amounts owing to Avis, 
would decrease net income by 
approximately $31 million. 

30

Acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

Acquired intangible assets result from 
the allocation of the cost of an 
acquisition to the identifiable intangible 
assets and net tangible assets of the 
acquired company. The remainder of 
the purchase price is classified into 
goodwill. Management uses an 
estimate of the fair value of each asset 
acquired to allocate the purchase price. 

Certain of these intangible assets, such 
as software and customer relationships, 
are amortized to expense over time. 
The amortization period for these assets 
is based on management's estimate of 
the useful life of the acquired intangible 
asset. 

The fair value of the identifiable 
intangible assets acquired is determined 
using accepted valuation methodologies 
such as the market approach, the cost 
approach and the income approach. 
These methodologies require estimates 
by management of future cash flows 
expected to be generated by the acquired 
assets and the appropriate discount rate 
for these cash flows. These factors also 
determine, to a large extent, the 
estimated useful life of the asset. In 
addition, management uses its judgment 
in selecting the levels of several other 
key indicators such as royalty rates for 
the use of trademarks and software, 
projected revenues from the existing 
customer base, customer attrition rates, 
as well as expected revenue growth and 
profit margins. 

Valuation of Derivatives 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

None of the derivatives that exist have 
readily determinable fair market values. 
Management relies, to some extent, on 
quotes received from the counterparty to 
the transaction in order to determine the 
fair value of the instruments. On a 
periodic basis, management reviews the 
statements provided by the counterparty 
to ensure the fair market values are 
reasonable when compared to the market 
value of the underlying commodity. 

The Company has entered into several 
financial arrangements that are 
considered to be derivative 
transactions. Where the Company has 
entered into interest rate swaps, the 
derivatives have been designated as 
cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the 
interest rate swaps are recorded at their 
fair value on the consolidated balance 
sheet. The changes in fair value of the 
interest rate swaps are recorded as a 
component of other comprehensive 
income rather than in earnings. Where 
the Company has entered into fuel price 
derivatives, no hedging relationship has 
been designated. Accordingly, when 
the derivatives are marked to their 
market value, the related gains or losses 
are recognized currently in earnings. 

Changes to Accounting Policies 

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

In the event that actual performance is 
significantly different than the 
assumptions used for valuation 
purposes, write-downs of intangible 
assets and/or goodwill could occur. 

As of December 31, 2008, the 
Company had an aggregate of 
approximately $80 million on its 
balance sheet related to goodwill and 
intangible assets of acquired entities. 
Within this total, approximately 
$2 million of non-goodwill assets were 
classified as indefinite-lived, comprised 
principally of trademarks and trade 
names. While we currently believe that 
the fair value of all of our intangibles 
exceeds carrying value and that those 
intangibles so classified will contribute 
indefinitely to the cash flows of the 
Company, materially different 
assumptions regarding future 
performance of our reporting units or 
the weighted-average cost of capital 
used in the valuations could result in 
significant impairment losses and/or 
amortization expense. 

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

As of December 31, 2008, the 
Company had established that the net 
fair value of the derivatives was an 
asset of approximately $47 million. 
Changes in fuel prices, interest rates 
and other variables have a significant 
impact on the value of the derivatives. 

Should either (i) the variables 
underlying pricing methodologies; (ii) 
the creditworthiness of the counterparty 
or (iii) the methodologies themselves 
substantially change, our results of 
operations could significantly change. 

We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2008. 

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and 
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement requires, among other things, the Company's valuation techniques 
used to measure fair value to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. This change 
resulted in no impact to January 1, 2008, retained earnings. 

31

In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 157, we adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and 
Financial Liabilities, as of January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 provides an option for most financial assets and liabilities to be reported at 
fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After initial adoption, the election is 
made at the acquisition of a financial asset, financial liability or a firm commitment and it may not be revoked. We have not elected 
the fair value option for any financial instruments or other items at fair value as permitted by SFAS No. 159. The adoption of this 
Statement therefore had no impact to January 1, 2008, retained earnings. 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to 

recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured 
at their fair values as of that date. It requires acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs that the acquirer expects but is not 
obligated to incur to be recognized separately from the acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) modifies the criteria for the recognition of 
contingencies as of the acquisition date. It also provides guidance on subsequent accounting for acquired contingencies. SFAS 
No. 141(R) is effective for business acquisitions for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009, the first day of our 
annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an 
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging 
activities. Under this Statement, entities are required to disclose how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative 
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging 
Activities, and its related interpretations and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods 
beginning after November 15, 2008. Our derivative disclosures already incorporate many of the provisions outlined in SFAS No. 161. 
Accordingly, we do not expect that the adoption of this pronouncement in 2009 will have a significant impact on our financial 
position, results of operations and cash flows. 

32

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

Interest Rate Risk 

At December 31, 2008, we had borrowings of $170.6 million on our credit facility that bore interest at a floating rate equal to

the one-month LIBOR plus 57.5 basis points. During 2007 we entered into two interest rate swap contracts that end in July 2009, and 
one interest rate swap contract that ends in August 2009 that fix the interest rate on $105 million of the variable rate revolving credit 
facility.

The following table presents the impact of changes in LIBOR on projected financing interest expense for 2009 on the unhedged 

portion of the principal outstanding under the credit facility (see the discussion of our interest rate swaps in Item 7 in the "Liquidity, 
Capital Resources and Cash Flows" section): 

(in thousands) 

Projected financing interest expense on variable rate portion of debt (one-month LIBOR equal to 1.04625%) 

Increases to LIBOR of:

2.00%
5.00%
10.00%

(a)

Impact

$

$
$
$

523

1,000
2,500
5,000

(a) Changes to financing interest expense presented in this table are based on interest payments on the revolving credit facility that bear interest based 

on one-month LIBOR, no repayment terms and the rate presented. 

33

Commodity Price Risk 

As discussed in the "Fuel Price Derivatives" section of Item 1, we use derivative instruments to manage the impact of volatility

in fuel prices. We enter into put and call option contracts ("Options") based on the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline and retail
price of diesel fuel, which settle on a monthly basis through the third quarter of 2010. The Options are intended to lock in a range of 
prices during any given quarter on a portion of our forecasted earnings subject to fuel price variations. Our fuel price risk management 
program is designed to purchase derivative instruments to manage our fuel price-related earnings exposure. 

The following table presents information about the Options: 

December 31, 

2008

2007

Put Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Call Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons) (b)

Fair Value 

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons)

Fair Value 

Fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 
Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 
Options settling April 2008 – December 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – September 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – June 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – March 2008 

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Total fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 

Fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 

Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 
Options settling April 2008 – December 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – September 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – June 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – March 2008 

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Total fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 

2.860
2.430
2.443
2.040
1.970
1.850
1.733
1.754
1.980
1.950
1.705

4.040
3.515
3.500
2.975
2.870
2.865
2.753
2.690
2.800
2.730
2.490

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

2.920
2.490
2.503
2.100
2.030
1.910
1.793
1.814
2.040
2.010
1.777

4.100
3.575
3.560
3.035
2.930
2.925
2.813
2.750
2.860
2.790
2.550

$

5,219
7,860
7,688
7,822
7,674
4,831
2,581
—
—
—
—

7,000
7,938
8,463
5,687
5,512
3,097
1,637
—
—
—
—

— $
—
—
7,822
7,674
6,695
9,670
6,386
7,738
5,341
3,100

—
—
—

(2,050 )
(2,904 )
(3,226 )
(5,966 )
(4,250 )
(3,968 )
(2,988 )
(2,239 )

43,675

39,334

54,426

(27,591 ) 

2,345
3,531
3,454
3,514
3,448
2,170
1,160
—
—
—
—

19,622

2,561
2,311
2,391
987
863
611
236
—
—
—
—

9,960

—
—
—
3,514
3,448
3,008
4,345
2,869
3,477
2,399
1,393

—
—
—

(1,090 )
(1,507 )
(1,495 )
(2,747 )
(2,031 )
(2,100 )
(1,687 )
(1,350 )

24,453

(14,007 ) 

Total fuel price derivative instruments 

63,297

$

49,294  

78,879

$

(41,598 ) 

(a)  The settlement of the Options is based upon the New York Mercantile Exchange's New York Harbor Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen 

Blending and the U.S. Department of Energy's weekly retail on-highway diesel fuel price for the month. 

(b)  The Options settle on a monthly basis. 

34

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

Page

36

37

38

39

40

41

35

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Wright Express Corporation 
South Portland, Maine  

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wright Express Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as 
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of 
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting 
as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of 
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over 
financial reporting, included in "Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting" appearing at Item 9A.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal
control over financial reporting based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of 
material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our 
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial 
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall 
financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal 
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating 
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we 
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. 

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors,
management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of 
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control 
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, 
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that 
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management 
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized 
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper 
management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to 
the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate. 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 
the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the 
period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also,
in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 
2008, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

February 26, 2009 

36

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Assets 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Accounts receivable (less reserve for credit losses of $18,435 in 2008 and $9,466 in 2007) 
Income taxes receivable 
Available-for-sale securities 
Fuel price derivatives, at fair value 
Property, equipment and capitalized software, net 
Deferred income taxes, net 
Goodwill 
Other intangible assets, net 
Other assets 

Total assets 

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 

Accounts payable 
Accrued expenses 
Deposits
Borrowed federal funds 
Revolving line-of-credit facilities 
Fuel price derivatives, at fair value 
Other liabilities 
Amounts due to Avis under tax receivable agreement 
Preferred stock; 10,000 shares authorized: 

Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock; 

0.1 shares issued and outstanding 

Total liabilities 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) 

Stockholders' Equity 

Common stock $0.01 par value; 175,000 shares authorized, 40,966 in 2008 

and 40,798 in 2007 shares issued; 38,244 in 2008 and 39,625 in 2007 shares outstanding 

Additional paid-in capital 
Retained earnings 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: 

Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities 
Net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps 
Net foreign currency translation adjustment 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss 

Less treasury stock at cost, 2,722 shares in 2008 and 1,173 shares in 2007 

Total stockholders' equity 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

37

December 31, 

2008

2007

$

183,117
702,225
7,903
12,533
49,294
44,864
239,957
315,230
39,922
16,810

$

43,019
1,070,273
3,320
9,494
—
45,537
283,092
294,365
20,932
15,044

$

1,611,855

$ 1,785,076

$

$

249,067
34,931
540,146
—
170,600
—
3,083
309,366

363,189
35,310
599,089
8,175
199,400
41,598
4,544
319,512

10,000

10,000

1,317,193

1,580,817

410
100,359
272,479

(53)
(1,736)
(55)

408
98,174
144,839

(49)
(1,417)
15

(1,844)

(1,451)

(76,742)

(37,711)

294,662

204,259

$

1,611,855

$ 1,785,076

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

297,441
19,339
30,631
31,043
11,549

$

257,493
14,452
26,767
26,885
10,253

214,641
17,528
23,999
22,351
12,728

390,003

335,850

291,247

3,579

278

—

393,582

336,128

291,247

66,969
20,361
45,021
8,510
9,159
5,283
3,215
3,248
2,527
20,123
34,993
3,155
9,586

65,014
14,987
20,569
8,738
6,091
4,711
1,879
3,433
2,163
15,018
34,086
224
7,123

60,016
14,525
16,695
7,823
6,157
3,018
1,204
3,496
1,998
10,988
23,415
—
6,809

232,150

184,036

156,144

161,432

152,092

135,103

(11,859)
—
55,206
(9,014)

(12,677)
(1,572)
(53,610)
78,904

(14,447)
—
(4,180)
—

195,765

163,137

116,476

68,125

111,560

41,867

127,640

$

51,577

$

74,609

3.28
3.22

$
$

1.29
1.27

$
$

1.85
1.81

38,885
39,787

40,042
40,751

40,373
41,553

$

$
$

Service Revenues 

Payment processing revenue 
Transaction processing revenue 
Account servicing revenue 
Finance fees 
Other

Total service revenues 

Product Revenues 

Hardware and equipment sales 

Total revenues 

Expenses 

Salary and other personnel 
Service fees 
Provision for credit losses 
Technology leasing and support 
Occupancy and equipment 
Advertising 
Marketing
Postage and shipping 
Communications
Depreciation and amortization 
Operating interest expense 
Cost of hardware and equipment sold 
Other

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 

Financing interest expense 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fuel price derivatives 
(Increase) decrease in amount due to Avis under tax receivable agreement 

Income before income taxes 

Income taxes 

Net income 

Earnings per share: 

Basic
Diluted

Weighted average common shares outstanding: 

Basic
Diluted

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

38

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 
(in thousands) 

Number of common shares issued 

Balance, beginning of period 

Stock issued to employees exercising stock options 
Stock issued to employees for vesting of restricted stock units 

Balance, end of period 

Common stock 

Balance, beginning of period 

Stock issued to employees exercising stock options 
Stock issued to employees for vesting of restricted stock units 

Balance, end of period 

Additional paid-in capital 

Balance, beginning of period 

Net adjustment resulting from tax impact of the initial public offering 
Stock issued to employees exercising stock options 
Tax benefit from employees' stock option and restricted stock plans 
Stock-based compensation 

Balance, end of period 

Retained earnings 

Balance, beginning of period 

Net income 

Balance, end of period 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income 

Balance, beginning of period 

Changes in available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of $(3) in 2008, 

$27 in 2007 and $(12) in 2006 

Changes in interest rate swaps, net of tax effect of $(208) in 2008, 

$(960) in 2007 and $(208) in 2006 

Foreign currency translation 

Net other comprehensive (loss) income adjustments 

Balance, end of period 

Treasury stock 

Balance, beginning of period 

Purchase of shares of treasury stock; 1,549 shares in 2008 and 1,173 shares in 2007 

Balance, end of period 

Total stockholders' equity 

Comprehensive income 

Net income 
Net other comprehensive (loss) income adjustments 

Total comprehensive income 

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

40,798
30
138
40,966

40,430
250
118
40,798

$

$

408
—
2
410

$

404
3
1
408

98,174
(1,379)
415
113
3,036
100,359

144,839
127,640
272,479

(1,451)

(4)

(319)
(70) 
(393)
(1,844)

89,325
—
3,456
3,023
2,370
98,174

93,262
51,577
144,839

136

49

(1,651)
15
(1,587)
(1,451)

(37,711)
(39,031)
(76,742)

—
(37,711)
(37,711)

40,210
163
57
40,430

402
1
1
404

82,894
(381)
2,228
1,047
3,537
89,325

18,653
74,609
93,262

664

(14)

(514)
—
(528)
136

—
—
—

$

$

$

294,662

$

204,259

$

183,127

127,640
(393)
127,247

$

$

51,577
(1,587)
49,990

$

$

74,609
(528)
74,081

39

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
(in thousands) 

Cash flows from operating activities 

Net income 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: 

Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments 
Stock-based compensation 
Depreciation and amortization 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 
Gain on sale of investment 
Deferred taxes 
Provision for credit losses 
Loss on disposal and impairment of property and equipment 
Loss on impairment of internal-use software under development 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: 

Accounts receivable 
Other assets 
Accounts payable 
Accrued expenses 
Income taxes 
Other liabilities 
Amounts due to Avis under tax receivable agreement 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

127,640

$

51,577

$

74,609

(90,892)
5,216
20,588
—
—
41,967
45,021
108
1,538

362,444
(328)
(156,463)
(1,105)
(4,934)
(1,475)
(10,146)

37,074
4,508
15,719
1,572
—
95,117
20,569
—
—

(286,236)
(2,163)
66,048
6,756
(4,147)
364
(98,847)

(32,186)
4,272
12,081
—
(2,188)
34,409
16,695
59
—

(79,944)
(4,214)
42,721
3,868
4,113
839
(14,685)

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 

339,179

(92,089)

60,449

Cash flows from investing activities 

Purchases of property and equipment 
Proceeds from sale of investment 
Purchases of available-for-sale securities 
Maturities of available-for-sale securities 
Purchases of fleet card receivables 
Purchase of trade name 
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired 

Net cash used for investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 

Excess tax benefits from equity instrument share-based payment arrangements 
Payments in lieu of issuing shares of common stock 
Proceeds from stock option exercises 
Net (decrease) increase in deposits 
Net (decrease) increase in borrowed federal funds 
Net (repayments) borrowings on 2007 revolving line-of-credit facility 
Loan origination fees paid for 2007 revolving line-of-credit facility 
Net repayments on 2005 revolving line-of-credit facility 
Repayments on term loan 
Repayments of acquired debt 
Purchase of shares of treasury stock 

(16,111)
—
(4,301)
1,255
—
(44) 
(41,613)

(16,624)
—
(2,518)
1,123
(1,922)
—
(40,806)

(12,474)
2,188
(2,154)
14,982
(86,784)
—
—

(60,814)

(60,747)

(84,242)

113
(2,225)
415
(58,943)
(8,175)
(28,800)
(1,556)
—
—
—
(39,031)

3,023
(2,188)
3,459
204,390
(57,221)
199,400
(998)
(20,000)
(131,000)
(374)
(37,711)

1,047
(734)
2,229
56,448
26,369
—
—
(33,000)
(38,500)
—
—

Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities 

(138,202)

160,780

13,859

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 

(65) 

15

—

Net change in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 

140,098
43,019

7,959
35,060

(9,934)
44,994

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period 

$

183,117

$

43,019

$

35,060

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

40

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

1.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business Description 

Wright Express is a leading provider of payment processing and information management services to the United States 
commercial and government vehicle fleet industry. The Company provides these services to customers throughout the United States
and Canada. 

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Wright Express for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 

include the accounts of Wright Express and its majority owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. 

For the year ended December 31, 2008, hardware and equipment sales, marketing expense and cost of hardware and equipment 
sold exceeded the Company's threshold for individual disclosure and were shown separately on the consolidated statements of income. 
In prior periods, hardware and equipment sales had been included in other revenues, and marketing expense and cost of hardware and
equipment sold had been included in other expenses. Prior period statements have been conformed to the 2008 presentation. 

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of 
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and 
expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and those differences may be material. 

Cash and Cash Equivalents 

Highly liquid investments with remaining maturities at the time of purchase of three months or less (that are readily convertible

to cash) are considered to be cash equivalents and are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Cash equivalents include
federal funds sold, which are unsecured short-term investments entered into with financial institutions. 

Accounts Receivable and Reserve for Credit Losses 

Accounts receivable balances are stated at net realizable value. The balance includes a reserve for credit losses which reflects

management's estimate of uncollectible balances resulting from credit and fraud losses. The reserve for credit losses is established 
based on the determination of the amount of probable credit losses inherent in the accounts receivable as of the reporting date.
Management reviews delinquency reports, historical collection rates, economic trends, and other information in order to make the
necessary judgments as to probable credit losses. Management also uses historical charge off experience to determine the amount of 
losses inherent in accounts receivable at the reporting date. Assumptions regarding probable credit losses are reviewed periodically
and may be impacted by actual performance of accounts receivable and changes in any of the factors discussed above. 

Available-for-sale Securities 

The Company records certain of its investments as available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair

value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported on the consolidated balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive 
income. Realized gains and losses and declines in fair value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are 
included in other revenues. The cost basis of securities is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on 
securities classified as available-for-sale are included in other revenues. 

41

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Derivatives

The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall strategy to manage its exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices and 

to reduce the impact of interest rate volatility. As a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative 
purposes. All derivatives are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

The Company's fuel price derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133. Gains or 

losses related to fuel price derivative instruments, both realized and unrealized, are recognized currently in earnings. These 
instruments are presented on the consolidated balance sheet as fuel price derivatives, at fair value. 

The Company's interest rate derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133 and, accordingly, 

the change in fair value associated with the effective portion of these derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting
treatment under SFAS No. 133 is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion, if any, is 
reported currently in earnings. Amounts included in other comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the same period
during which the hedged item affects earnings. These instruments are presented as either other assets or accrued expenses on the
consolidated balance sheet. 

The Company assesses the hedge effectiveness of the interest rate swaps in accordance with the requirements outlined in SFAS 

No. 133. For these hedges, management documents, both at inception and over the life of the hedge, at least quarterly, its analysis of 
actual and expected hedge effectiveness. For those hedging relationships in which the critical terms of the entire debt instrument and 
the derivative are identical, and the creditworthiness of the counterparty to the hedging instrument remains sound, there is no hedge 
ineffectiveness so long as those conditions continue to be met. 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Replacements, renewals and improvements are 

capitalized and costs for repair and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives shown below. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lesser of 
the useful life of the asset or remaining lease term. 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment 
Computer software 
Leasehold improvements 

Capitalized Software

Estimated Useful Lives 

5 to 7 years
18 months to 7 years
5 to 15 years

The Company develops software that is used in providing processing and information management services to customers. A 

significant portion of the Company's capital expenditures are for the development of internal-use computer software. Software 
development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of the software has been established. Costs incurred prior to 
establishing technological feasibility are expensed as incurred. Technological feasibility is established when the Company has 
completed all planning, designing, coding and testing activities that are necessary to determine that the software can be produced to 
meet its design specifications, including functions, features and technical performance requirements. Capitalization of costs ceases 
when the software is ready for its intended use. Software development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful life of the software. Capitalized costs include interest costs incurred while developing internal-use computer software. 
Amounts capitalized for software were $14,962 in 2008, $16,737 in 2007 and $11,460 in 2006. Amortization for software totaled 
$13,650 in 2008, $11,452 in 2007 and $8,036 in 2006. 

42

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company classifies intangible assets into three 

categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization, (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to 
amortization and (3) goodwill. The Company tests intangible assets with definite lives for impairment if conditions exist that indicate
the carrying value may not be recoverable. Such conditions may include an economic downturn or a change in the assessment of 
future operations. The Company records an impairment charge when the carrying value of the definite-lived intangible asset is not 
recoverable by the cash flows generated from the use of the asset. 

Intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill are not amortized. The Company tests these intangible assets and goodwill 

for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that such intangible assets or goodwill might be 
impaired. All goodwill is assigned to reporting units, which are one level below the Company's operating segments. Goodwill is 
assigned to the reporting unit which benefits from the synergies arising from each business combination. The Company performs its
impairment tests of goodwill at its reporting unit level. Such impairment tests for goodwill include comparing the fair value of the 
respective reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. The Company uses a variety of methodologies in conducting
these impairment tests, including discounted cash flow analyses. Certain assumptions are used in determining the fair value, including 
assumptions about future cash flows and terminal values. When appropriate, the Company considers the assumptions that it believes
hypothetical marketplace participants would use in estimating future cash flows. In addition, where applicable, an appropriate discount 
rate is used, based on the Company's cost of capital rate or reporting unit-specific economic factors. When the fair value is less than 
the carrying value of the intangible assets or the reporting unit, the Company records an impairment charge to reduce the carrying 
value of the assets to fair value. Impairment charges are recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the consolidated
statement of income. The Company's annual goodwill impairment test, performed as of October 1, did not identify any impairment in 
any of the years presented. 

The Company determines the useful lives of our identifiable intangible assets after considering the specific facts and 
circumstances related to each intangible asset. Factors management considers when determining useful lives include the contractual 
term of any agreement, the history of the asset, the Company's long-term strategy for the use of the asset, any laws or other local
regulations which could impact the useful life of the asset and other economic factors, including competition and specific market
conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized over their useful lives, which is the period of time 
that the asset is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. An evaluation of the remaining useful lives of the 
definite-lived intangible assets is performed periodically to determine if any change is warranted. 

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as a reduction in operating cash 

flow or a dramatic change in the manner the asset is intended to be used, indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be 
recoverable. If indicators exist, the Company compares the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with these assets or 
operations to their carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value (normally measured by the expected present value 
technique) is required. The Company recognized $1,646 of impairment expense on its long-lived assets during the year ended 
December 31, 2008. No impairment expense was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2007, and $59 was recognized 
during the year ended December 31, 2006. These amounts were recorded in occupancy and equipment in the consolidated statements 
of income. 

Other Assets

The Company has an investment in the stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $1,562 for all years presented, which is 

carried at cost and not considered a readily marketable security. This investment is included in other assets on the consolidated
balance sheet. 

43

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deposits, borrowed 

federal funds and other liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The 
carrying values of the revolving line-of-credit facilities and preferred stock approximate their respective fair values as the interest rates 
on these financial instruments are variable. The rates are tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and adjust at least
quarterly. All other financial instruments are reflected at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. 

Revenue Recognition

The majority of the Company's revenues are comprised of transaction-based fees, which typically are calculated based on 

measures such as percentage of dollar volume processed, number of transactions processed, or some combination thereof. The 
Company has entered into agreements with major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle maintenance providers, which specify that a 
transaction is deemed to be captured when the Company has validated that the transaction has no errors and has accepted and posted 
the data to the Company's records. The Company recognizes revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the services
have been provided to the client, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. 

A description of the major components of revenue is as follows: 

Payment Processing Revenue.    Revenue consists of transaction fees assessed to major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle 
maintenance providers. The fee charged is generally based upon a percentage of the total transaction amount; however, it may also be 
based on a fixed amount charged per transaction or, on a combination of both measures. The fee is deducted from the Company's 
payment to the major oil company, fuel retailer or vehicle maintenance provider and recorded as revenue at the time the transaction is 
captured.

Interchange income is earned by the Company's MasterCard products and included in payment processing revenue. Interchange 

income is a fee paid by a merchant bank to the card-issuing bank through the interchange network. Interchange fees are set by 
MasterCard International Inc. and are based on cardholder purchase volumes. The Company recognizes interchange income as earned.

Transaction Processing Revenue.    The Company earns transaction fees, which are principally based on the number of 
transactions processed; however, the fees may be a percentage of the total transaction amount. These fees are recognized at the time 
the transaction is captured. 

Account Servicing Revenue.    Revenue is primarily comprised of monthly fees based on fleet accounts on file, both active and 

inactive. These fees are primarily in return for providing monthly vehicle data reports. Account servicing revenue is recognized
monthly, as the Company fulfills its contractual service obligations. 

Finance Fees.    The Company earns revenue by assessing monthly finance fees on accounts with overdue balances. These fees 

are recognized as revenue, net of a provision to estimate uncollectible amounts, at the time the fees are assessed. The reserve for 
uncollectible finance fee income totaled $1,117 at December 31, 2008, and $987 at December 31, 2007. This reserve is in addition to 
our reserve for credit losses. 

Other.    The Company assesses fees for providing ancillary services, such as information services, professional services and 

marketing services. Other revenues also include fees for overnight shipping, certain customized electronic reporting and customer
contact services provided on behalf of certain of the Company's customers. The Company also assesses fees for holding receivables
related to certain transaction processing transactions. Service-related revenues are recognized in the period that the work is performed. 

Interest and dividends earned on investments in available-for-sale securities also are included in other revenues, as well as 
realized gains and losses on the investments in available-for-sale securities. Investment-related income is recognized in the period that 
it is earned. 

Hardware and Equipment Sales.    The Company sells telematics devices as part of its WEXSmartTM telematics program. In 
addition, the Company sells assorted equipment to its Pacific Pride franchisees. The Company recognizes revenue from these sales
when the customer has accepted delivery of the product and collectibility of the sales amount is reasonably assured. 

44

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

From time to time the Company provides rebates and/or incentives to certain customers and selected strategic relationships in 

order to induce them to use the Company's payment processing or transaction processing services. The Company follows the guidance 
prescribed in Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including 
a Reseller of the Vendor's Products), which requires that cash consideration given by a vendor to a customer should be characterized 
as a reduction of revenue. Accordingly, the revenues described above are net of rebates and incentives provided to customers. Rebates 
are recorded in the period in which they are earned. Incentives are recognized on a pro rata basis over the term of the contract and 
derecognized only when a determination is made that the targeted objective will not be achieved. 

Stock-Based Compensation 

The Company sponsors restricted stock award plans and stock option plans. The Company accounts for these plans as 
prescribed by SFAS No. 123(R), Share Based Payment. The Company recognizes compensation expense related to employee stock 
awards over their vesting periods based upon the fair value of the award on the date of grant. 

Advertising Costs 

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed in the period the advertising occurs. 

Income Taxes 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under SFAS 
No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the 
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities 
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are 
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period 
that includes the enactment date. The realizability of deferred tax assets must also be assessed. The ultimate realization of deferred tax 
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the associated temporary differences
became deductible. A valuation allowance must be established for deferred tax assets which are not believed to more likely than not be 
realized in the future. Deferred taxes are not provided for the undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries that are 
considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 23, 
Accounting for Income Taxes – Special Areas.

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation 
No. ("FIN") 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the 
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, and 
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to 
be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at 
the largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax 
position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50 percent likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance 
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company did not 
recognize a material liability for unrecognized tax benefits in conjunction with its FIN 48 implementation. However, as the Company 
accrues for such liabilities when they arise, the Company will recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions 
as part of its income tax provision. 

45

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Earnings per Common Share 

Diluted earnings per common share is calculated using weighted-average shares outstanding and contingently issuable shares, 

less weighted-average shares reacquired during the period. The net outstanding shares are adjusted for the dilutive effect of shares 
issuable upon the assumed conversion of the Company's convertible, redeemable preferred stock and common stock equivalents, 
which consist of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock units. The dividends expensed on convertible, redeemable
preferred stock are added back to net income when the related common stock equivalents are included in the computation of diluted
earnings per common share. 

Income available for common stockholders used to calculate earnings per share is as follows: 

Income available for common stockholders – Basic 
Convertible, redeemable preferred stock 

Income available for common stockholders – Diluted 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

127,640
474

$

51,577
—

$

74,609
674

128,114

$

51,577

$

75,283

Weighted average common shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share is as follows: 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic 
Unvested restricted stock units 
Stock options 
Convertible, redeemable preferred stock 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

38,885
419
39
444

40,042
605
104
—

40,373
549
187
444

Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted 

39,787

40,751

41,553

The following were not included in Weighted average common shares 

outstanding - Diluted because they are anti-dilutive: 
Convertible, redeemable preferred stock 

—

444

—

Foreign Currency Translation 

The financial statements of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar, are

translated to U.S. dollars as prescribed by SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. Assets and liabilities are translated at the year 
end spot exchange rate, revenue and expenses at average exchange rates and equity transactions at historical exchange rates. Exchange 
differences arising on translation are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized and unrealized
gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are recorded directly to the statement of income. 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, the changes in fair 

values of derivative instruments designated as hedges of future cash flows related to interest rate variability and foreign currency 
translation adjustments pertaining to the net investment in foreign operations. Amounts are recognized net of tax to the extent
applicable. 

46

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards 

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of 
January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting 
principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement requires, among other things, the Company's 
valuation techniques used to measure fair value to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable 
inputs. This change resulted in no impact to January 1, 2008, retained earnings. 

In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 157, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial 
Assets and Financial Liabilities, as of January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 provides an option for most financial assets and liabilities to be 
reported at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After initial adoption, the 
election is made at the acquisition of a financial asset, financial liability or a firm commitment and it may not be revoked. The 
Company has not elected the fair value option for any financial instruments or other items at fair value as permitted by SFAS No. 159. 
The adoption of this Statement therefore had no impact to January 1, 2008, retained earnings. 

New Accounting Pronouncements 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to 

recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured 
at their fair values as of that date. It requires acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs that the acquirer expects but is not 
obligated to incur to be recognized separately from the acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) modifies the criteria for the recognition of 
contingencies as of the acquisition date. It also provides guidance on subsequent accounting for acquired contingencies. SFAS 
No. 141(R) is effective for business acquisitions for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009, the first day of the 
Company's annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an 
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging 
activities. Under this Statement, entities are required to disclose how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative 
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging 
Activities, and its related interpretations and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods 
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company's derivative disclosures already incorporate many of the provisions outlined in 
SFAS No. 161. Accordingly, the Company does not expect that the adoption of this pronouncement in 2009 will have a significant 
impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. 

2.    Supplemental Cash Flow Information 

Interest paid 
Income taxes paid 

Significant Non-cash Transactions 

There were no significant non-cash transactions during 2008. 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$
$

47,120
31,000

$
$

43,947
17,642

$
$

35,049
3,033

During 2007, the Company entered into a software licensing agreement that has been capitalized. The agreement requires 

monthly payments over three years in return for the right to use certain software applications in perpetuity. The net present value of 
the monthly payments was $2,872 at the time the agreement was entered into. 

47

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

During 2006, the Company received updated tax information relative to the change in tax bases of the Company's assets and 

liabilities precipitated by the Company's initial public offering from Avis. This resulted in the Company adjusting both amounts due to 
Avis, by approximately $8,767, and the Company's deferred tax asset, by approximately $10,314; such adjustments were offset in 
additional paid-in-capital. Additionally, the Company adjusted for changes in expected tax rates on its deferred tax liability related to 
the change in tax bases of the Company's assets and liabilities precipitated by the Company's initial public offering. This adjustment of 
$1,928 was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital. 

3.    Business Acquisitions 

Acquisition of TelaPoint, Inc.  In August 2007, the Company acquired the stock of TelaPoint, Inc. ("TelaPoint") for 

approximately $40,000 cash. The Company purchased TelaPoint in order to take advantage of its browser-based supply chain software
solutions for bulk petroleum distributors and retailers. 

The following is a reconciliation of the cost of TelaPoint with the net assets acquired and the ultimate allocation to goodwill:

Consideration paid (including acquisition costs and net of cash acquired) 
Less:

Net liabilities assumed 
Software
Customer relationships 
Trademarks 

Recorded goodwill 

$

40,806

(649)
9,000
10,000
600

$

21,855

Acquisition of Pacific Pride Services, Inc.  In February 2008, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain 
liabilities of Pacific Pride Services, Inc. and established Pacific Pride Services, LLC ("Pacific Pride") for approximately $32,000 cash. 
Pacific Pride's franchise network encompasses more than three-hundred forty independent fuel franchisees who issue their own Pacific 
Pride commercial fueling cards to fleet customers. These cards provide access to fuel at more than two thousand Pacific Pride and 
strategic partner locations in the United States and Canada. The Company has allocated the purchase price of the acquisition based
upon the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In connection with the fair valuing of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, management performed assessments of intangible assets using customary valuation procedures and
techniques. The purchase price and related allocations for the Pacific Pride acquisition have not been finalized. 

The following is a reconciliation of the cost of the net assets acquired from Pacific Pride Services, Inc. and the ultimate 

allocation to goodwill: 

Consideration paid (including acquisition costs and net of cash acquired) 
Less:

Accounts receivable 
Accounts payable 
Other tangible assets, net 
Software (a) 
Non-compete agreement (b) 
Customer relationships (c)
Trademarks and trade names (d) 

Recorded goodwill 

(a)  Weighted average life – 2.0 years. 
(b)  Weighted average life – 1.0 year. 
(c) Weighted average life – 4.9 years. 
(d) 
Indefinite-lived intangible asset. 

48

$

31,540

39,396
(42,341)
148
300
100
13,400
1,400

$

19,137

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The weighted average life of the combined definite-lived intangible assets is 4.8 years. 

Acquisition of Financial Automation Limited.  In August 2008, the Company acquired certain assets of Financial Automation 
Limited for approximately $9,250 cash and established Wright Express New Zealand ("Wright Express New Zealand") to operate the 
business of Financial Automation Limited. 

Financial Automation Limited provides fuel card processing software solutions to oil companies in geographic markets outside 

the United States. The Company has allocated the purchase price of the acquisition based upon the fair values of the assets acquired. 
In connection with the fair valuing of the assets acquired, management performed assessments of intangible assets using customary 
valuation procedures and techniques. The purchase price and related allocations for this acquisition have not been finalized. 

The following is a reconciliation of the cost of the assets acquired from Financial Automation Limited and the ultimate 

allocation to goodwill: 

Consideration paid (including acquisition costs and net of cash acquired) 
Less:

Tangible assets, net 
Software (a) 
Customer relationship (b) 
Trade name (c)

Recorded goodwill 

(a)  Weighted average life – 4.4 years. 
(b)  Weighted average life – 4.5 years. 
(c) Weighted average life – 1.6 years. 

$

10,073

96
7,000
1,500
100

$

1,377

The weighted average life of the combined definite-lived intangible assets is 4.4 years. 

The operations for each of these acquisitions are reported within the results of the Company's fleet segment from the 

acquisition date. 

Significant goodwill amounts are present in both the TelaPoint and Pacific Pride acquisitions based on the Company's belief that

the business models and practices followed by these entities were sufficiently distinct to warrant the payment of a purchase price
premium. 

No pro forma information has been included in these financial statements as the results of operations of TelaPoint, Pacific Pride
and Financial Automation Limited for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, are immaterial to the Company's revenues, net 
income or earnings per share. 

4.    Reserves for Credit Losses 

The following table presents changes in reserves for credit losses related to accounts receivable: 

Balance, beginning of period 
Provision for credit losses 
Acquired loss reserve 
Charge-offs 
Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off 

Balance, end of period 

49

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

9,466
45,021
—
(42,625)
6,573

$

9,749
20,569
—
(25,282)
4,430

4,627
16,695
608
(15,630)
3,449

$

18,435

$

9,466

$

9,749

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

5.    Investments 

Available-for-sale Securities 

The Company's available-for-sale securities as of December 31 are presented below: 

2008

Mortgage-backed securities 
Asset-backed securities 
Municipal bonds 
Equity securities (a)

Total available-for-sale securities 

2007

Mortgage-backed securities 
Municipal bonds
Equity securities (a)

Total available-for-sale securities

Gross 
Unrealized
Gains 

Gross 
Unrealized
Losses

Cost

Fair Value 

$

4,232
3,956
390
4,038

38   $
—  
2
3  

$

33
82
—
11

4,237
3,874
392
4,030

12,616

$

43   $

126

$

12,533

$

5,298
400
3,872

7   $
3
5  

$

84
—
7

5,221
403
3,870

9,570

$

15   $

91

$

9,494

$

$

$

$

(a)  These securities exclude $1,401 in equity securities designated as trading as of December 31, 2008, and $2,019 as of December 31, 2007, 

included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 16 for additional information about the securities designated as trading. 

The Company's management has determined that the gross unrealized losses on its investment securities at December 31, 2008, 

are temporary in nature. The Company reviews its investments to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible 
impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time and extent to which fair value
has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and the Company's intent and ability 
to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Substantially all of the 
Company's fixed income securities are rated investment grade or better. 

The Company had maturities of $1,255 of available-for-sale securities for the year ended December 31, 2008, $1,123 of 

available-for-sale securities for the year ended December 31, 2007, and $14,982 of available-for-sale securities for the year ended 
December 31, 2006. 

The maturity dates of the Company's available-for-sale securities are as follows: 

Due within 1 year 
Due after 1 year through year 5 
Due after 5 years through year 10 
Due after 10 years 
Mortgage backed securities with original maturities of 30 years 
Equity securities with no maturity dates 

December 31, 

2008

2007

Cost

Fair Value 

Cost

Fair Value 

$

— $
—
2,878
1,468
4,232
4,038

—   $
—
2,834  
1,432  
4,237  
4,030  

— $
—
400
—
5,298
3,872

—
—
403
—
5,221
3,870

Total 

$

12,616

$

12,533   $

9,570

$

9,494

50

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Sale of Investment 

As a member bank of MasterCard International Inc., the Company's wholly owned bank subsidiary received $500 in cash and 

27.6 shares of Class B stock from MasterCard International Inc. as part of their initial public offering in 2006. The Company later sold 
its shares of MasterCard International Inc. Class B stock during the fourth quarter of 2006 for a pre-tax gain of approximately $1,700. 
All of these proceeds were included in other revenues on the consolidated statement of income and are reflected on the consolidated 
statement of cash flows as proceeds from sale of investment. 

6.    Property, Equipment and Capitalized Software, Net 

Property, equipment and capitalized software, net consist of the following: 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment 
Computer software 
Software under development 
Leasehold improvements 

Total 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 

Total property, equipment and capitalized software, net 

December 31, 

2008

2007

$

$

13,131
81,666
6,467
1,414

11,909
68,481
7,225
1,306

102,678
(57,814)

88,921
(43,384)

$

44,864

$

45,537

In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company incurred a $1,538 impairment charge related to partially completed internal-use 

software. The impaired asset has been excluded from software under development, and the related impairment charge has been 
included in occupancy and equipment expense on the consolidated statements of income. 

7.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets 

The changes in goodwill during the period January 1 to December 31, 2008 were as follows: 

Goodwill, beginning of period 

Adjustment to allocation of purchase price for TelaPoint acquisition 
Acquisition of Pacific Pride 
Acquisition of FAL 

Goodwill, end of period 

Fleet
Segment

MasterCard
Segment

$

$

284,652
351
19,137
1,377

$

9,713
—
—
—

Total

294,365
351
19,137
1,377

$

305,517

$

9,713

$

315,230

During the period January 1 to December 31, 2008, no goodwill was written off due to impairment. 

51

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The changes in intangible assets during the period January 1 to December 31, 2008, were as follows: 

Definite-lived intangible assets 

Software
Non-compete agreement 
Customer relationships 
Trade name

Indefinite-lived intangible assets 
Trademarks and trade names

Total

Net Carrying 
Amount,
Beginning of 
Period

Acquisitions 

Amortization

Net Carrying 
Amount, 
End of 
Period

$

$

$

8,755
—
9,156
—

7,300
100
14,900
100

3,021
20,932

$

1,444
23,844

$

$

(970) $
(83)
(3,789)
(12)

15,085
17
20,267
88

—
(4,854) $

4,465
39,922

The Company expects amortization expense related to the definite-lived intangible assets above as follows:  $5,070 for 2009; 

$5,431 for 2010; $4,710 for 2011; $4,075 for 2012; and $3,459 for 2013. 

Other intangible assets consist of the following: 

Definite-lived intangible assets 

Software
Non-compete agreement 
Customer relationships 
Trade name

Indefinite-lived intangible assets 
Trademarks and trade names

Total 

8.    Accounts Payable 

Accounts payable consist of: 

Merchants payable
Other payables 

Total accounts payable 

December 31, 2008 

December 31, 2007 

Gross
Carrying 
Amount 

Accumulated 
Amortization

Net Carrying 
Amount 

Gross 
Carrying 
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net Carrying 
Amount

$

$

16,300
100
24,900
100

(1,215) $
(83)
(4,633)
(12)

$

15,085
17
20,267
88

$

9,000
—
10,000
—

(245) $
—
(844)
—

8,755
—
9,156
—

$

41,400

$

(5,943)

35,457

$

19,000

$

(1,089)

17,911

4,465

$

39,922

3,021

$

20,932

December 31, 

2008

2007

$

$

239,899
9,168

$

349,444
13,745

249,067

$

363,189

52

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

9.    Deposits and Borrowed Federal Funds 

The following table presents information about deposits: 

Certificates of deposit with maturities within 1 year 
Certificates of deposit with maturities greater than 1 year and less than 5 years 
Non-interest bearing deposits 

Total deposits 

December 31, 

2008

2007

$

$

507,370
24,646
8,130

496,652
97,152
5,285

$

540,146

$

599,089

Weighted average cost of funds on certificates of deposit outstanding 

3.85 %

5.16 %

Wright Express Financial Services Corporation ("FSC") issues certificates of deposit in various maturities ranging between 
three months and three years and with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.85 percent to 5.45 percent as of December 31, 2008. FSC
may issue certificates of deposit without limitation on the balance outstanding. However, FSC must maintain minimum financial 
ratios, which include risk-based asset and capital requirements, as prescribed by the FDIC. As of December 31, 2008, certificates of 
deposit were in denominations of $250 or less, corresponding to the increase in the FDIC insurance limits to $250 as authorized by the 
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The certificates of deposit are only payable prior to maturity in the case of death or 
legally declared mental incompetence of the holder. 

Non-interest bearing deposits are required for certain customers as collateral for their credit accounts. 

The Company had federal funds lines-of-credit totaling $155,000 at December 31, 2008, and $160,000 at December 31, 2007. 
There were no outstanding borrowings against these lines-of-credit at December 31, 2008, and approximately $8,175 at December 31,
2007. The average rate on the outstanding borrowings under lines-of-credit was 4.38 percent at December 31, 2007. 

The following table presents the average interest rates for deposits and borrowed federal funds: 

Average interest rate: 

Deposits
Borrowed federal funds 

Average debt balance 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

4.42 % 
2.44 % 

5.27 %
5.29 %

4.85 %
5.14 %

$

664,646

$

544,674

$

381,673

53

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

10.  Derivative Instruments 

Fuel Price Derivatives 

The Company uses derivative instruments to manage the impact of volatility in fuel prices. The Company enters into put and 
call option contracts ("Options") based on the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline and retail price of diesel fuel, which settle on a 
monthly basis through the third quarter of 2010. The Options are intended to lock in a range of prices during any given quarter on a 
portion of the Company's forecasted earnings subject to fuel price variations. The Company's fuel price risk management program is 
designed to purchase derivative instruments to manage its fuel price-related earnings exposure. The fair value of these instruments is 
recorded in fuel price derivative instruments, at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. 

The following table presents information about the Options: 

December 31, 

2008

2007

Put Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Call Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons) (b)

Fair Value 

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons)

Fair Value 

Fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 
Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 
Options settling April 2008 – December 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – September 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – June 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – March 2008 

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Total fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 

Fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 

Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 
Options settling April 2008 – December 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – September 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – June 2008 
Options settling January 2008 – March 2008 

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Total fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 

2.860
2.430
2.443
2.040
1.970
1.850
1.733
1.754
1.980
1.950
1.705

4.040
3.515
3.500
2.975
2.870
2.865
2.753
2.690
2.800
2.730
2.490

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

2.920
2.490
2.503
2.100
2.030
1.910
1.793
1.814
2.040
2.010
1.777

4.100
3.575
3.560
3.035
2.930
2.925
2.813
2.750
2.860
2.790
2.550

$

5,219
7,860
7,688
7,822
7,674
4,831
2,581
—
—
—
—

7,000
7,938
8,463
5,687
5,512
3,097
1,637
—
—
—
—

— $
—
—
7,822
7,674
6,695
9,670
6,386
7,738
5,341
3,100

—
—
—

(2,050 )
(2,904 )
(3,226 )
(5,966 )
(4,250 )
(3,968 )
(2,988 )
(2,239 )

43,675

39,334

54,426

(27,591 ) 

2,345
3,531
3,454
3,514
3,448
2,170
1,160
—
—
—
—

19,622

2,561
2,311
2,391
987
863
611
236
—
—
—
—

9,960

—
—
—
3,514
3,448
3,008
4,345
2,869
3,477
2,399
1,393

—
—
—

(1,090 )
(1,507 )
(1,495 )
(2,747 )
(2,031 )
(2,100 )
(1,687 )
(1,350 )

24,453

(14,007 ) 

Total fuel price derivative instruments 

63,297

$

49,294  

78,879

$

(41,598 ) 

(a)  The settlement of the Options is based upon the New York Mercantile Exchange's New York Harbor Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen 

Blending and the U.S. Department of Energy's weekly retail on-highway diesel fuel price for the month. 

(b)  The Options settle on a monthly basis. 

54

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Options which have been recorded in net realized and 

unrealized losses on derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of income: 

Realized losses 
Unrealized gains (losses) 

Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments 

Interest Rate Swaps 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

(35,686) $
90,892

(16,536) $
(37,074)

(36,366)
32,186

55,206

$

(53,610) $

(4,180)

In July 2007, the Company entered into interest rate swap arrangements (the "July 2007 Swaps") with two counterparties, 
effective from July 23, 2007 through July 22, 2009. In addition, in August 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap
arrangement (the "August 2007 Swap") with a third counterparty. The August 2007 Swap is effective from August 22, 2007 through 
August 24, 2009. Both the July 2007 Swaps and the August 2007 Swap were designated as cash flow hedges intended to reduce a 
portion of the variability of the future interest payments on the Company's variable rate credit agreement. The fair value of these
instruments is recorded in other assets or accrued expenses, as appropriate. 

The following table presents information about the Company's interest rate swap arrangements: 

July 2007 Swaps 
August 2007 Swap 

Total 

December 31, 

2008

Weighted-
Average 
Base Rate 

Aggregate 
Notional 

Fair Value 

Weighted-
Average
Base Rate 

2007

Aggregate
Notional

Fair Value 

5.20%  $
4.73% 

80,000
25,000

$

(2,048)
(694)

5.20% $
4.73%

80,000
25,000

$

(1,786)
(429)

$

105,000

$

(2,742)

$

105,000

$

(2,215)

In April 2005, the Company entered into interest rate swap arrangements (the "2005 Swaps") with two counterparties. The 2005 

Swaps were designated as cash flow hedges intended to reduce a portion of the variability of the future interest payments on the
Company's variable rate debt instruments discussed in Note 11. The fair value of the 2005 Swaps was recorded in other assets. The
2005 Swaps expired on April 23, 2007. 

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of the Company's interest rate swap arrangements: 

Realized (losses) gains 

(a)

Unrealized losses, net of tax impact of $(208) in 2008, $(960) in 2007 and $(208) in 2006 

(b)

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

(2,240) $

414

$

1,175

(319) $

(1,651) $

(514)

$

$

(a) Realized gains and losses on the Company's interest rate swap arrangements have been recorded in financing interest expense on the consolidated 

statement of income. 

(b) Unrealized gains and losses on the Company's interest rate swap arrangements, net of the tax impact, have been recorded in accumulated other 
comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheet. No ineffectiveness was reclassified into earnings during the years shown in the table. 

55

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

11.  Financing Debt 

Revolving Credit Facility 

On May 22, 2007, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility (the "2007 Revolver") with a lending syndicate. The 

2007 Revolver initially provided for a five-year $350 million unsecured revolving line-of-credit. In connection with the 2007 
Revolver, the Company paid loan origination fees of $998. These fees have been recorded as other assets on the consolidated balance 
sheet and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the 2007 Revolver. On May 29, 2008, the Company entered into 
an incremental amendment agreement (the "Incremental Amendment Agreement") of the 2007 Revolver to increase the aggregate 
unsecured revolving line-of-credit from $350,000 to $450,000. The Company incurred $1,556 in loan origination fees in conjunction 
with entering into the Incremental Amendment Agreement. These fees have been recorded as other assets on the consolidated balance 
sheet and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the 2007 Revolver. All other provisions of the 2007 
Revolver remain unchanged. 

Amounts outstanding under the 2007 Revolver bear interest at a rate equal to (a) the British Bankers Association LIBOR plus a 

margin of 0.45 percent to 1.125 percent based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio or (b) the higher of the Federal Funds
Rate plus 0.50 percent or the prime rate announced by Bank of America, N.A., plus a margin of up to 0.125 percent based on the 
Company's consolidated leverage ratio. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate per annum
ranging from 0.10 percent to 0.20 percent of the daily unused portion of the 2007 Revolver. The Company also has a letter of credit 
associated with the 2007 Revolver. The letter of credit reduces the amount available for borrowings and may collateralize certain of 
the Company's derivative instruments. The Company is assessed a fee on the liquidation value of the letter of credit. This fee was 
0.575 percent at December 31, 2008, and 0.7 percent at December 31, 2007. The balance under the letter of credit was $1 at 
December 31, 2008. The balance of the letter of credit was $12,000 at December 31, 2007. Any outstanding loans under the 
2007 Revolver mature on May 22, 2012, unless extended pursuant to the terms of the 2007 Revolver. As of December 31, 2008, the 
Company had approximately $279,000 available under this facility. 

Proceeds from the 2007 Revolver were used to refinance the Company's indebtedness under an existing credit facility which 
consisted of a revolving line-of-credit facility (the "2005 Revolver") and a term loan (the "Term Loan"). All balances owed by the 
Company, which included $20,000 on the 2005 Revolver and $131,000 on the Term Loan have been paid and the Company's 
obligations have been satisfied. In 2007, the Company expensed $1,572 of unamortized loan origination fees in conjunction with the 
termination of the 2005 Revolver and the Term Loan. This charge has been recorded on the consolidated statement of income as loss
on extinguishment of debt. 

The following table presents information about the 2007 Revolver: 

Outstanding balance on revolving line-of-credit with interest based on LIBOR 
Outstanding balance on revolving line-of-credit with interest based on the prime rate 

Total outstanding balance on revolving line-of-credit facility 

December 31, 

2008

2007

$

$

155,000
15,600

$

194,000
5,400

170,600

$

199,400

Weighted average rate based on one-month LIBOR (including impact of interest rate swaps) 
Rate based on the prime rate 

3.78 %
3.25 %

5.39 %
7.25 %

On February 22, 2005, the Company entered into the 2005 Revolver which provided a total available line-of-credit of $130,000. 

Borrowings under the 2005 Revolver carried variable interest rates based on LIBOR and the prime rate. As discussed above, the 
2005 Revolver was terminated on May 22, 2007. 

56

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Term Loan 

Also on February 22, 2005, the Company entered into the Term Loan in which it borrowed $220,000, net of loan origination 
fees of $2,884. Loan origination fees related to the term loan were amortized using the effective interest rate method. The term loan 
bore a variable interest rate that was based on LIBOR. The rate in effect was 6.75 percent at December 31, 2006. As discussed above, 
on May 22, 2007, the Company extinguished the Term Loan with the proceeds of the 2007 Revolver. 

Financing Interest 

The following table presents the components of financing interest expense: 

2007 Revolver: 

Interest expense based on LIBOR 
Interest expense based on the prime rate 
Fees
Amortization of loan origination fees 

2005 Revolver: 

Interest expense based on LIBOR 
Interest expense based on the prime rate 
Fees
Amortization of loan origination fees 

Term Loan: 

Interest expense based on LIBOR 
Amortization of loan origination fees 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

7,793
261
508
465

9,027

—
—
—
—

—

—
—

—

$

6,584
340
162
144

7,230

746
199
145
134

1,224

3,379
423

3,802

—
—
—
—

—

2,607
448
435
341

3,831

10,365
752

11,117

Realized losses (gains) on interest rate swaps (Note 10) 

2,240

(414 )

(1,175 )

Dividends on preferred stock (Note 13) 

Other

474

118

700

135

674

—

Total financing interest expense 

$

11,859

$

12,677

$

14,447

Average interest rate (including impact of interest rate swaps): 

Based on LIBOR 
Based on prime 

Average debt balance at LIBOR 
Average debt balance at prime 

Debt Covenants 

4.54 %
5.01 %

6.07 %
8.09 %

6.01 %
8.45 %

$
$

221,044
5,210

$
$

169,671
6,660

$
$

196,319
5,300

The 2007 Revolver contains various financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. In addition,
the 2007 Revolver contains various customary restrictive covenants that limit the Company's ability to pay dividends, sell or transfer 
all or substantially all of its property or assets, incur more indebtedness or make guarantees, grant or incur liens on its assets, make 
investments, loans, advances or acquisitions, engage in mergers, consolidations, liquidations or dissolutions, enter into sales or 
leasebacks or change its accounting policies or reporting practices. FSC is not subject to certain of these restrictions. 

57

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

12.  Related Parties 

During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company utilized legal services in the normal course of business from a law firm where the 

spouse of one of the Company's officers is a principal. Amounts paid to this law firm in connection with services provided were
approximately $108 during 2008, $74 during 2007 and $48 during 2006. 

13.  Preferred Stock 

There were 0.1 shares of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 

2008 and 2007, with a par value of $0.01 per share and a purchase price per share and liquidation value per share of $100,000. The 
discussion below highlights the features of the preferred stock. Given these features, the Company has treated the preferred stock as a 
liability under SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.
Accordingly, dividends are recorded as interest expense on the consolidated statements of income. 

Voting rights.    Except in the limited circumstances described below and to the extent required by the Delaware General 
Corporation Law, the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock has no voting power with respect to the election of 
directors or any other stockholder matters. Consent of the holders of at least 50 percent of the outstanding Series A non-voting
convertible, redeemable preferred stock, voting as a separate class, is required to  (i) increase the authorized number of shares of 
Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, or  (ii) amend or repeal the Company's certificate of incorporation in a 
manner that adversely affects the rights, preferences or privileges granted to the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred 
stock.

Dividends.    The holder of each share of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock is entitled to receive, out 

of funds legally available, cumulative cash dividends at a floating rate equal to the three-month LIBOR, plus 150 basis points,
multiplied by $100,000 per share of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, per annum, payable on a 
quarterly basis commencing on June 15, 2005, in preference to any dividends paid on the Company's common stock. If the Company 
fails to pay these dividends for two quarterly periods, the dividend rate will increase by 50 basis points until all dividends in arrears 
have been paid. Dividends on the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock accrue whether or not the Company has 
earnings, whether or not the Company has funds legally available for the payment of such dividends and whether or not the Company
declares such dividends. At December 31, 2008, the cash dividend rate was 3.37 percent, at December 31, 2007, this rate was 
6.44 percent and at December 31, 2006, this rate was 6.87 percent. The Company recorded interest expense of $474 related to these
dividends for the year ended December 31, 2008, $700 for the year ended December 31, 2007, and $674 for the year ended 
December 31, 2006. These dividends have been recorded as financing interest expense on the consolidated statements of income. 

Liquidation preference.    In the event of the Company's liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of the Series A non-
voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock are entitled to receive a liquidation preference of an amount per share of Series A non-
voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock equal to the sum of  (i) $100,000 per share of the Company's Series A non-voting
convertible, redeemable preferred stock, plus  (ii) accrued but unpaid dividends. The liquidation preference will be adjusted for 
combinations, consolidations, subdivisions or splits of the Company's Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock. A 
merger, acquisition or sale of all or substantially all of the Company's and its subsidiaries' assets, in each case, in which the holders of 
the Company's common stock immediately prior to such transaction hold less than 50 percent of the voting power of the surviving or 
purchasing entity is treated as a liquidation of the Company for these purposes. After payment in full to creditors, if the Company's 
assets are insufficient to pay the liquidation preference to the holders of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred 
stock, all of the Company's assets will be distributed ratably among the holders of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable
preferred stock, based upon the total liquidation preference due each holder. After payment of the liquidation preference to the holders 
of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, the Company's remaining assets will be distributed to the holders 
of the Company's common stock. 

58

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Conversion.    Each share of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock may, in certain limited circumstances, 

at the option of the holder, be converted into a number of shares of common stock equal to the liquidation preference divided by the 
then applicable conversion price. In addition, in the event of certain mergers, acquisitions or sales of assets, each holder will have the 
right to receive a make-whole premium. The initial per share conversion price is $22.50 per share and is subject to anti-dilution 
adjustments. Conversion rights may only be exercised  (i) after five years from the date of issuance of the Series A non-voting
convertible, redeemable preferred stock and only if the Company indicates its intention to redeem or  (ii) immediately prior to a 
merger, acquisition or sale of all or substantially all of the Company and its subsidiaries' assets. 

Redemption rights.    At any time after five years from the date of issuance of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable 
preferred stock, the Company may redeem, in whole or in part, the outstanding shares of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable
preferred stock for $100,000 per share in cash or shares of common stock equal to 101 percent of the liquidation preference on the 
redemption date. On the five and one-half year anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable 
preferred stock and on each anniversary thereafter, each holder may require the Company to redeem their shares of Series A non-
voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock for $100,000 per share in cash equal to the liquidation preference on the redemption 
date. At the Company's option, shares of the Company's common stock having the fair market value of the redemption price – see 
"Liquidation preference" above may be used to satisfy the redemption request. After 10 years from the date of issuance of the Series A 
non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, all of the outstanding shares of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable
preferred stock must be redeemed for a price per share in cash equal to the liquidation preference on the redemption date. 

14.  Income Taxes 

Income before income taxes consisted of the following: 

United States 
Foreign

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

196,329

$

(564 )

163,133
4

$

116,476
—

195,765

$

163,137

$

116,476

Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations consisted of the following for the years ended December 31: 

2008

Current
Deferred

2007

Current 
Deferred 

2006

Current 
Deferred 

United States

State
and Local 

Foreign 

Total

$
$

$
$

$
$

22,896
47,302

15,076
13,470

8,949
31,738

$
$

$
$

$
$

$
3,245
(5,231) $

$
11
(98) $

26,152
41,973

1,485
81,528

$
$

1
$
— $

16,562
94,998

(2,213) $
$
3,393

— $
— $

6,736
35,131

59

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The reconciliation between the income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and the reported effective tax 

rate on income from continuing operations is as follows: 

Federal statutory rate 

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 
Revaluation of deferred tax assets, net 
Dividend exclusion 
Other

Effective tax rate 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

35.0 % 
1.9
(2.7)
0.1
0.5

35.0 % 
1.4
32.0
0.1
(0.1)

35.0 % 
0.7
—
0.2
0.1

34.8 % 

68.4 % 

36.0 % 

In 2008 and 2007, the Company reassessed the blended tax rates that are projected into the future. In 2008, the net future 
benefits increased which resulted in an increase to deferred tax assets and a decrease in the provision for income taxes in the amount 
of $8,881. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company established a valuation allowance of $158 against certain of its state net
operating losses. 

On June 7, 2007, the State of Maine enacted a law effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2007, which changed 

the State's rules for apportioning income related to the performance of services. The new law effectively reduced taxable income or 
loss allocable to the State of Maine. This caused a reduction in the Company's blended state income tax rate. The effect of this lower 
state income tax rate on the temporary differences decreased the Company's deferred tax assets which resulted in a charge to the
provision for income taxes for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, of $80,879. 

The tax effects of temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for tax and financial reporting purposes that

give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities are presented below: 

Deferred assets related to: 
Reserve for credit losses 
Stock-based compensation, net 
State net operating loss carry forwards, net of valuation allowance of $158 in 2008 and none in 2007 
Derivatives 
Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps and available-for-sale securities, net 
Tax deductible intangibles, primarily goodwill, net

Deferred tax liabilities related to: 

Other assets 
Property, equipment and capitalized software 
Derivatives 

Deferred income taxes, net

December 31, 

2008

2007

$

$

6,927
2,880
883
—
1,035
260,367

3,513
2,579
631
11,018
824
275,300

272,092

293,865

1,454
8,564
22,117

112
10,661
—

32,135

10,773

$

239,957

$

283,092

The deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are included in deferred income taxes, net on the consolidated balance sheet.

60

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The Company had approximately $289,920 of state and $385 of foreign net operating loss carry forwards at December 31, 

2008, and $224,388 of state net operating loss carry forwards at December 31, 2007. There were no foreign net operating loss carry 
forwards at December 31, 2007. These expire at various times through 2028. Valuation allowances have been established for those
state net operating losses that the Company believes it is more likely than not that they will not be utilized within the carry forward 
period. 

Deferred income taxes have not been provided for the undistributed (deficit) earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, 

which aggregated to approximately $(477) at December 31, 2008, and $3 at December 31, 2007. The Company plans to reinvest any 
earnings for future expansion in the respective foreign jurisdictions. A portion of the undistributed earnings will be subject to U.S. 
taxation upon repatriation as dividends to the U.S. parent. The amount of taxes attributable to these undistributed earnings is not 
practicably determinable. 

The Company has recorded a reduction of $1,379 to deferred income taxes and a comparable decrease in additional paid-in 
capital in the 2008 financial statements to correct an improperly recorded basis difference at the time of the initial public offering. The 
Company determined that, due to the immateriality of the correction, revisions to the prior year financial statements are not necessary. 

15.  Tax Receivable Agreement 

As a consequence of the Company's separation from Avis, the tax bases of the Company's tangible and intangible assets 
increased (the "Tax Basis Increase"). This Tax Basis Increase is expected to reduce the amount of tax that the Company may pay in 
the future to the extent the Company generates taxable income in sufficient amounts in the future. The Company is contractually
obligated, pursuant to its tax receivable agreement with Avis, to remit to Avis 85 percent of any such cash savings, subject to
repayment if it is determined that these savings should not have been available to the Company. 

In both 2008 and 2007 there has been reassessment of the blended tax rates that are projected into the future. In 2008, the net
future benefits increased, which increased the associated liability to Avis, resulting in a $9,014 charge to non-operating expense for 
the year ended December 31, 2008. 

In 2007, the tax rate changes in Maine caused projections of future rates to decrease. Accordingly, the related contractual 

liability to Avis recorded in connection with the tax receivable agreement also decreased. This decrease resulted in non-operating 
income of $78,904 for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

16.  Employee Benefit Plans 

The Company sponsors a 401(k) retirement and savings plan. The Company's employees who are at least 18 years of age, have 

worked at least 1,000 hours in the past year, and have completed one year of service are eligible to participate in this plan. The 
Company matches 100 percent of each employee's contributions up to a maximum of 6 percent of each employee's eligible 
compensation. All contributions vest immediately. Wright Express has the right to discontinue this plan at any time. Contributions to 
the plan are voluntary. The Company contributed $1,860 for the year ended December 31, 2008, $1,652 for the year ended 
December 31, 2007, and $1,476 for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

The Company also sponsors a defined contribution plan for certain employees designated by the Company. Participants may 

elect to defer receipt of designated percentages or amounts of their compensation. The Company maintains a grantor's trust to hold the 
assets under the Company's defined contribution plan. The obligation related to the defined contribution plan totaled $1,401 at
December 31, 2008, and $2,019 at December 31, 2007. These amounts are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance
sheet. The assets held in trust are designated as trading securities under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt 
and Equity Securities, which required securities to be recorded at fair value with any changes recorded currently to earnings. The 
aggregate market value of the securities with the trust was $1,401 at December 31, 2008, and $2,019 at December 31, 2007. Such 
amounts are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. 

61

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

17.  Fair Value 

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157. This standard establishes a consistent framework for 

measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157, among other things, 
requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value. The Company recorded no change to 
January 1, 2008, retained earnings as a result of adopting SFAS No. 157. 

The Company holds mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, fixed income and equity securities, derivatives and 

certain other financial instruments which are carried at fair value. The Company determines fair value based upon quoted prices when 
available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as model pricing, when market quotes are not readily accessible or
available. The Company carries certain of its liabilities at fair value, including its derivative liabilities. In determining the fair value of 
the Company's obligations, various factors are considered including:  closing exchange or over-the-counter market price quotations; 
time value and volatility factors underlying options and derivatives; price activity for equivalent instruments; the Company's own-
credit standing; and counterparty credit risk. 

These valuation techniques may be based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data 

obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs
create the following fair value hierarchy: 

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. 

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in 
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value 
drivers are observable. 

Level 3 – Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable. 

62

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table presents the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value and the related hierarchy levels:

Fair Value Measurements 
at Reporting Date Using 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) 

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for 
Identical Assets 
(Level 1) 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) 

December 31,
2008

Assets: 

Mortgage-backed securities 
Asset-backed securities 
Municipal bonds 
Equity securities 

Total available-for-sale securities 

Executive deferred compensation plan trust (a)

Fuel price derivatives – diesel 
Fuel price derivatives – unleaded fuel 

Total fuel price derivatives

Liabilities: 

July 2007 interest rate swap arrangements with a base 

rate of 5.20% and an aggregate notional amount of $80,000 

August 2007 interest rate swap arrangement with a 

base rate of 4.73% and a notional amount of $25,000 

Total interest rate swap arrangements (b) 

(a)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in other assets. 
(b)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in accrued expenses. 

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

4,237
3,874
392
4,030

12,533

1,401

9,960
39,334

$

$

$

$

— $
—
—
4,030

4,030

1,401

$

$

$

4,237
3,874
392
—

8,503

$

— $

—
—
—
—

—

—

— $
—

— $

39,334

9,960
—

49,294

$

— $

39,334

$

9,960

2,048

$

— $

2,048

$

694

—

694

2,742

$

— $

2,742

$

—

—

—

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets (liabilities) measured at fair value 

on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended December 31, 2008: 

Beginning balance 

Total gains or (losses) – realized/unrealized 

Included in earnings (a)
Included in other comprehensive income 

Purchases, issuances and settlements 
Transfers in/(out) of Level 3 

Ending balance 

Fuel Price 
Derivatives – 
Diesel

$

(14,037 ) 

23,997
—
—
—

$

9,960

(a)  Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2008, are reported in net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price 

derivatives on the consolidated statements of income. 

63

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Available-for-sale securities and executive deferred compensation plan trust

When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of available-for-sale securities; such items 

are classified in Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy. These securities primarily consist of exchange-traded equity securities.

For mortgage-backed and asset-backed debt securities and bonds, the Company generally uses quoted prices for recent trading 

activity of assets with similar characteristics to the debt security or bond being valued. The securities and bonds priced using such 
methods are generally classified as Level 2. 

Fuel price derivatives and interest rate swap arrangements 

The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and so are valued using internal 
valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation technique and inputs depend on the type of 
derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument. The principal technique used to value these instruments is a comparison of the 
spot price of the underlying instrument to its related futures curve adjusted for the Company's assumptions of volatility and present 
value, where appropriate. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect the expected cash the Company will pay or receive upon
settlement of the respective contracts. 

The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield 

curves, the spot price of the underlying instrument, volatility, and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 
depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenures are generally less
observable. 

18.  Commitments and Contingencies 

Litigation 

In addition, the Company is involved in pending litigation in the usual course of business. In the opinion of management, such 
litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 

Extension of Credit to Customers 

The Company had commitments aggregating approximately $3,915,000 at December 31, 2008, and $2,924,000 at 
December 31, 2007, related to payment processing services, primarily related to commitments to extend credit to customers and 
customers of strategic relationships as part of established lending product agreements. Many of these are not expected to be used;
therefore, total unused credit available to customers and customers of strategic relationships does not represent future cash 
requirements. The Company can increase or decrease its customers' credit lines at our discretion at any time. These amounts are not 
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet. 

Operating Leases 

The Company leases office space, equipment, and vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates 

through 2019. Two of the Company's office space lease agreements were renewed during 2006 and another agreement was renewed in 
2007. In addition, the Company rents office equipment under agreements that may be canceled at any time. Rental expense related to 
office space, equipment, and vehicle leases amounted to $3,569 for the year ended December 31, 2008, $3,231 for the year ended 
December 31, 2007, and $3,178 for the year ended December 31, 2006. These amounts were included in occupancy and equipment on 
the consolidated statements of income. The Company also leases information technology hardware and software under non-cancelable
leases that expire at various dates through 2009. Along with these non-cancelable agreements, the Company leases information 
technology hardware and software under agreements that may be terminated by the Company at any time. Lease expense related to 
information technology hardware and software leases totaled $2,625 for the year ended December 31, 2008, $2,475 for the year ended 
December 31, 2007, and $2,422 for the year ended December 31, 2006. These amounts were included in technology leasing and 
support on the consolidated statements of income. 

64

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows: 

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013

Total 

19.  Cash and Dividend Restrictions 

Cash 

Payment 

$

3,921
2,744
2,507
2,097
1,751

$

13,020

Federal Reserve Board regulations may require reserve balances on certain deposits to be maintained with the Federal Reserve 

Bank. No such reserves were required at December 31, 2008 or 2007. 

Dividends 

FSC is chartered under the laws of the State of Utah and the FDIC insures its deposits. Under Utah law, FSC may only pay a 

dividend out of undivided profits after it has  (i) provided for all expenses, losses, interest and taxes accrued or due from FSC
and (ii) transferred to a surplus fund 10 percent of its net profits before dividends for the period covered by the dividend, until the 
surplus reaches 100 percent of its capital stock. For purposes of these Utah dividend limitations, the FSC's capital stock is $5,250 and 
its capital surplus exceeds 100 percent of capital stock. 

Under FDIC regulations, FSC may not pay any dividend if, following the payment of the dividend, FSC would be 

"undercapitalized," as defined under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and applicable regulations. 

FSC complied with the aforementioned dividend restrictions for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. 

20.  Stock-Based Compensation 

The Company's 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which is stockholder-approved, permits the grant of share options, 

stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock- or cash-based awards to non-employee directors,
officers, employees, advisors or consultants for up to 3,200 shares of common stock. The Company believes that such awards increase 
efforts on behalf of the Company and promote the success of the Company's business. On December 31, 2008, the Company had four 
share-based compensation programs, which are described below. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for 
these programs totals $5,216 for 2008, $4,508 for 2007, and $4,389 for 2006. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income 
statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $1,815 for 2008, $3,081 for 2007, and $1,577 for 2006. 

Restricted Stock Units 

The Company awards restricted stock units ("RSUs") to non-employee directors and certain employees periodically under the 
Plan. An RSU is a right granted to receive stock at the end of a specified period. RSU awards generally vest evenly over a period of 
three or four years. The awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change of control (as defined in the Plan). The fair value of 
each RSU award is based on the closing market price of the Company's stock one business day prior to the grant date as reported by 
the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"). 

65

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

A summary of the status of the Company's RSUs as of December 31, 2008, and changes during the year then ended is presented 

below: 

Restricted Stock Units 

Balance at January 1, 2008 
Granted 
Vested – shares issued 
Vested – shares deferred 
Forfeited
Withheld for taxes 

(b)

(a)

Balance at December 31, 2008 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value 

Units

$
505
$
66
(108 ) $
(23 )  $
(22 )  $
(60 )  $

24.86
32.38
23.65
22.29
28.09
23.09

358

$

26.87

(a) The Company issued fully vested and non-forfeitable restricted stock units to certain non-employee directors and certain employees that are 

payable in shares of the Company's common stock at a later date as specified by the award (deferred stock units or "DSUs"). 

(b) The Company has elected to pay cash equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld for income tax purposes instead of issuing the shares 

of common stock. The cash is remitted to the appropriate taxing authority and the shares are never issued. 

As of December 31, 2008, there was $6,138 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based 

compensation arrangements granted as RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years. The 
total fair value of shares vested was $5,117 during 2008, $7,931 during 2007, and $2,132 during 2006. 

Deferred Stock Units 

Under the Plan, the Company also grants DSUs to non-employee directors and certain employees. A DSU is a fully vested right 

to receive stock at a certain point in time in the future. DSUs do not require any future service or performance obligations to be met. 
DSUs may be granted immediately or may initially be granted as RSUs which become DSUs once a previously determined service 
obligation has been met. The fair value of each granted DSU award is based on the closing market price of the Company's stock on the 
grant date as reported by the NYSE. 

A summary of the status of the Company's DSUs as of December 31, 2008, and changes during the year ended December 31, 

2008, is presented below: 

Deferred Stock Units 

Balance at January 1, 2008 
Granted as DSUs 
Converted from RSUs
Converted to common shares 
Withheld for taxes 

(a)

Balance at December 31, 2008 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value 

Units

$
100
$
6
$
23
(30 )  $
(19 )  $

22.15
23.36
22.29
21.77
21.66

80

$

22.55

(a) The Company has elected to pay cash equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld for income tax purposes instead of issuing the shares 

of common stock. The cash is remitted to the appropriate taxing authority and the shares are never issued. 

There is no unrecognized compensation cost related to awards granted as, or converted to, DSUs. The Company has determined 
that the award was earned when granted and is expensed at that time. The total fair value of shares vested was $242 during 2008, $195 
during 2007, and $361 during 2006. 

66

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Performance Based Restricted Stock Units 

The Company also awards performance based restricted stock units ("PBRSUs") to employees periodically under the Plan. A 

PBRSU is a right granted to receive stock at the end of a specified period. In a PBRSU, the number of shares earned varies based upon 
meeting certain company-wide performance goals, including revenue and earnings in excess of targets. PBRSU awards generally have
performance goals tracking a one to four year period, depending on the nature of the performance goal. The fair value of each PBRSU
award is based on the closing market price of the Company's stock one business day prior to the grant date as reported by the NYSE. 

A summary of the status of certain of the Company's PBRSUs at threshold and target performance as of December 31, 2008, 

and changes during the year then ended is presented below: 

Performance Based Restricted Stock Units 

Balance at January 1, 2008 
Granted 
Vested
Forfeited

Balance at December 31, 2008 

Units at 
Threshold 

Units at 
Target

Weighted-
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value 

51
—
—
(6 )

45

103
—
—
(12 ) 

91

$

35.45

Management has determined that the performance conditions of this award are not probable of being met as of December 31, 

2008. Accordingly, the Company has not recognized any compensation cost related to the PBRSU award above. The range of 
unrecognized compensation cost related to the award is from $1,825 at threshold, 50 percent below targeted performance, to $3,650 at 
target, 100 percent of targeted performance, as of December 31, 2008, depending whether certain performance conditions are met. No 
portion of this award had vested as of December 31, 2008. 

In addition to the PBRSUs discussed above, the Company issued approximately 11 units through two separate awards with a 

value at targeted performance levels of $228 during 2008. The Company recognized $117 as compensation cost related to these 
awards in 2008. The range of unrecognized compensation cost related to these awards is from $0 at threshold, 50 percent below 
targeted performance, to $225 at maximum, 150 percent above targeted performance, as of December 31, 2008, depending whether 
certain performance conditions are met. No portion of these awards had vested as of December 31, 2008. 

Stock Options 

On February 22, 2005, the Company granted options to purchase the Company's common stock to certain employees as part of 
its IPO. Employee stock options granted by the Company had terms ranging from one to seven years, were fully vested, with exercise
prices ranging from $5.72 to $14.98. 

67

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The activity of the stock option plan related to the Company's employees consisted of: 

Stock Options 

Outstanding at January 1, 2008 
Granted 
Exercised
Forfeited or expired 

Weighted-
Average 
Remaining 
Contractual 
Term (in 
years) 

Weighted-
Average 
Exercise
Price

Aggregate 
Intrinsic 
Value

Shares

117

$
— $
(30 )  $
— $

13.49  
—  
13.71  
—  

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2008 

87

$

13.42  

2.9

$

(72 )

No stock options were awarded by the Company during the years 2008, 2007 and 2006. The total intrinsic value of options 

exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 was $495, $4,974, and $2,435, respectively. 

21.  Segment Information 

Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, as 
components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating
decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company's chief
operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The operating segments are reviewed separately because each operating 
segment represents a strategic business unit that generally offers different products and serves different markets. 

The Company's chief decision maker evaluates the operating results of the Company's reportable segments based upon revenues 

and "adjusted net income," which is defined by the Company as net income adjusted for fair value changes of derivative instruments, 
the amortization of acquired intangible assets and a non-cash asset impairment charge taken in the fourth quarter of 2008 for 
internal-use software under development. These adjustments are reflected net of the tax impact. 

The Company operates in two reportable segments, Fleet and MasterCard. The Fleet segment provides customers with payment 

and transaction processing services specifically designed for the needs of vehicle fleet customers. This segment also provides 
information management services to these fleet customers. The MasterCard segment provides customers with a payment processing 
solution for their corporate purchasing and transaction monitoring needs. Revenue in this segment is derived from two product lines – 
corporate charge cards and single use accounts. The MasterCard products are used by businesses to facilitate purchases of products
and utilize the Company's information management capabilities. 

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are generally the same as those described in the summary of significant 

accounting policies. 

Financing interest expense and net realized and unrealized losses on derivative instruments are not allocated to the MasterCard

segment in the computation of segment results for internal evaluation purposes. Total assets are not allocated to the segments.

68

  
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table presents the Company's reportable segment results for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006: 

Year ended December 31, 2008 

Fleet
MasterCard 

Total

Year ended December 31, 2007 

Fleet
MasterCard

Total

Year ended December 31, 2006 

Fleet
MasterCard

Total

Total 
Revenues

Operating 
Interest
Expense

Depreciation
and
Amortization

Provision for 
Income Taxes 

Adjusted Net 
Income

$

$

$

$

$

$

366,610
26,972

$

32,148
2,845

$

19,483   $
640  

34,900
2,217

$

69,993
4,155

393,582

$

34,993

$

20,123   $

37,117

$

74,148

313,618
22,510

$

31,490
2,596

$

14,299   $
719  

123,240
2,050

$

72,357
3,653

336,128

$

34,086

$

15,018   $

125,290

$

76,010

271,901
19,346

$

21,667
1,748

$

10,796   $
192  

26,558
1,944

$

52,332
3,456

291,247

$

23,415

$

10,988   $

28,502

$

55,788

The following table reconciles adjusted net income to net income: 

Adjusted net income 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments 
Amortization of acquired intangible assets 
Asset impairment charge 
Tax impact 

Net income 

Geographic Data 

Total revenues: 
United States 
International

Total revenues 

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

74,148
90,892
(4,854)
(1,538)
(31,008)

$

76,010
(37,074)
(1,089)
—
13,730

55,788
32,186
—
—
(13,365)

$

127,640

$

51,577

$

74,609

Year ended December 31, 
2007

2006

2008

$

$

393,137
445

$

336,123
5

$

291,247
—

393,582

$

336,128

$

291,247

69

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (concluded) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

22.  Quarterly Financial Results (Unaudited) 

Summarized quarterly results for the two years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, are as follows: 

2008
Total revenues 
Operating income 
Net income (loss) 
Earnings (loss) per share: 

Basic
Diluted 

2007
Total revenues 
Operating income 
Net income 
Earnings per share: 

Basic
Diluted

March 31 

June 30 

September 30 December 31 

Three months ended 

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

$
$

92,946
37,068
14,528

0.37
0.36

71,822
26,903
8,337

0.21
0.20

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

$
$

111,238   $
50,948   $
(24,383 ) $

108,531
54,402
72,344

(0.63 )  $
(0.63 )  $

1.86
1.82

85,973   $
42,647   $
16,354   $

0.41   $
0.40   $

87,652
43,002
22,263

0.56
0.55

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

$
$

80,867
19,014
65,151

1.69
1.66

90,681
39,540
4,623

0.12
0.11

70

  
  
  
  
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL 

DISCLOSURE 

Not applicable. 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Wright Express Corporation evaluated the effectiveness of the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. "Disclosure controls and procedures" 
are controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company 
in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules 
and forms, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, and is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, 
including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required 
disclosure. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Wright Express Corporation 
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008. 

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

Wright Express' management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. 

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial 
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted 
in the United States of America. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive 
officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation was conducted of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting 
based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 
Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management 
concluded that Wright Express' internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008. 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, has been audited by Deloitte & 

Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein. 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended 

December 31, 2008, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over 
financial reporting. 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 

Not applicable. 

71

PART III 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Members of 

the Board of Directors," "Non-Director Members of the Executive Management Team," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership 
Reporting Compliance," "Director Nominations," "Communications with the Board of Directors," "Board and Committee Meetings" 
and "Corporate Governance Information," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

Website Availability of Corporate Governance and Other Documents 

The following documents are available on the Corporate Governance page of the investor relations section of the Company's 

website, www.wrightexpress.com:  (1) the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors,  (2) the Code of Ethics for Chief 
Executive and Senior Financial Officers,  (3) the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and  (4) key Board Committee 
charters, including charters for the Audit, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees. Stockholders also may obtain 
printed copies of these documents by submitting a written request to Investor Relations, Wright Express, 97 Darling Avenue, South
Portland, Maine 04106. The Company intends to post on its website, www.wrightexpress.com, all disclosures that are required by law
or New York Stock Exchange listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, the provisions of the documents 
referenced in (1) and (2) above. 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Executive 

Compensation" and the related subsections, "Director Compensation" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider 
Participation," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED 

STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Securities 

Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans" and "Principal Stockholders" and the related subsections, which 
information is incorporated herein by reference. 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Director 

Independence" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES 

See the section of the Company's proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Auditor Selection 

and Fees," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

72

PART IV 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 

The following documents are filed as part of this report: 

1.  Financial Statements (see Index to Financial Statements on page 35).

Exhibit No. 

Description 

3.1

3.2

4.1

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

†

†

†

†

†

†

†

†

Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on 
March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the 
SEC on November 20, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

Rights Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2005, by and between Wright Express Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National 
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005, 
File No. 001-32426). 

Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2005, by and between Cendant Corporation and Wright Express 
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Credit Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2007, by and among Wright Express Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a division of 
SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication agent, BMO
Capital Markets, KeyBank National Association, and TD Banknorth, N.A., as co-documentation agents, and the other lenders 
party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 
2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Guaranty, dated as of May 22, 2007, by and among Wright Express Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and
Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders party to the Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Incremental Amendment Agreement among Wright Express Corporation; Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing
line lender and letter of credit issuer; Banc of America Securities LLC; SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a division of SunTrust 
Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers; SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication agent; and with other
lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2008, File
No. 001-32426). 

Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Wright Express Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7 to our Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 10, 2005, File No. 333-120679). 

Wright Express Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Wright Express Corporation Amended and Restated Short Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4
to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-324426).** 

Wright Express Corporation Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Quarterly Report 
on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-32426).** 

Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Severance Pay Plan for Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Employment Agreement with Michael E. Dubyak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K 
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

73

†

†

†

†

†

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22

10.23

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

10.29

Form of Employment Agreement for David Maxsimic and Melissa Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.6 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of Employment Agreement for Robert Cornett, Hilary Rapkin and Jamie Morin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on 
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received prior to December 31, 2006)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2008, File No. 
001-32426). 

Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received subsequent to 
December 31, 2006)  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 5, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
April 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27,
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Confirmation of transaction between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005 (incorporated 
by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Schedule to the Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

Confirmation of transaction between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005 (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from J. Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with 
the SEC on October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from J. 
Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Credit Support Annex to the Schedule Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National 
Bank) and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly 
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

Amendment to the ISDA Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National Bank) and Wright 
Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from 
Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by
Wright Express Corporation from Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express 
Corporation, dated as of June 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

74

10.30

10.31

10.32

10.33

10.34

10.35

10.36

21.1

23.1

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

†

Confirmation of transaction between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express Corporation,
dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 5, 2005 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 
Confirmation of transaction between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
June 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7,
2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Confirmation of transaction between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 22, 2007 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Wachovia Bank, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as
of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 
2008, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

Subsidiaries of the registrant. 

Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm – Deloitte & Touche LLP. 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

Filed with this report. 

Portions of exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which has been granted. 

Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of 
this Form 10-K. 

75

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report 
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES 

February 26, 2009 

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 

By:

/s/  Melissa D. Smith 
Melissa D. Smith 
CFO and Executive Vice President, Finance and 
Operations  
(principal financial and accounting officer) 

76

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on 
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 

February 26, 2009 

February 26, 2009 

February 26, 2009 

February 26, 2009 

February 26, 2009 

February 26, 2009 

February 26, 2009 

February 26, 2009 

/s/  Michael E. Dubyak 
Michael E. Dubyak 
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
(principal executive officer)

/s/  Rowland T. Moriarty 
Rowland T. Moriarty 
Lead Director

/s/  Shikhar Ghosh 
Shikhar Ghosh 
Director

/s/  Ronald T. Maheu 
Ronald T. Maheu 
Director

/s/  George L. McTavish 
George L. McTavish 
Director

/s/  Kirk Pond 
Kirk Pond 
Director

/s/  Regina O. Sommer 
Regina O. Sommer 
Director

/s/  Jack A. VanWoerkom 
Jack A. VanWoerkom 
Director

77

  
 
  
 
  
 
Exhibit No. 

EXHIBIT INDEX 

Description 

3.1

3.2

4.1

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

†

†

†

†

†

†

†

†

Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on 
March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the 
SEC on November 20, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

Rights Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2005, by and between Wright Express Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National 
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005, 
File No. 001-32426). 

Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2005, by and between Cendant Corporation and Wright Express 
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Credit Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2007, by and among Wright Express Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a division of 
SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication agent, BMO
Capital Markets, KeyBank National Association, and TD Banknorth, N.A., as co-documentation agents, and the other lenders 
party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 
2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Guaranty, dated as of May 22, 2007, by and among Wright Express Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and
Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders party to the Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Incremental Amendment Agreement among Wright Express Corporation; Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing
line lender and letter of credit issuer; Banc of America Securities LLC; SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a division of SunTrust 
Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers; SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication agent; and with other
lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2008, File
No. 001-32426). 

Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Wright Express Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7 to our Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 10, 2005, File No. 333-120679). 

Wright Express Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Wright Express Corporation Amended and Restated Short Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4
to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-324426).** 

Wright Express Corporation Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Quarterly Report 
on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-32426).** 

Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Severance Pay Plan for Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Employment Agreement with Michael E. Dubyak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K 
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

78

†

†

†

†

†

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22

10.23

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

10.29

Form of Employment Agreement for David Maxsimic and Melissa Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.6 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of Employment Agreement for Robert Cornett, Hilary Rapkin and Jamie Morin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on 
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received prior to December 31, 2006)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2008, File No. 
001-32426). 

Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received subsequent to 
December 31, 2006)  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 5, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
April 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27,
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Confirmation of transaction between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005 (incorporated 
by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Schedule to the Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

Confirmation of transaction between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005 (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from J. Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with 
the SEC on October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from J. 
Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Credit Support Annex to the Schedule Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National 
Bank) and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly 
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

Amendment to the ISDA Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National Bank) and Wright 
Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from 
Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by
Wright Express Corporation from Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express 
Corporation, dated as of June 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

79

10.30

10.31

10.32

10.33

10.34

10.35

10.36

21.1

23.1

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

†

Confirmation of transaction between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express Corporation,
dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 5, 2005 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 
Confirmation of transaction between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
June 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7,
2007, File No. 001-32426). 

Confirmation of transaction between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 22, 2007 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Wachovia Bank, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as
of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 
2008, File No. 001-32426). 

Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

Subsidiaries of the registrant. 

Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm – Deloitte & Touche LLP. 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

Filed with this report. 

Portions of exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which has been granted. 

Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of 
this Form 10-K. 

80

Corporate Headquarters

Wright Express Corporation

97 Darling Avenue

South Portland, ME 04106

Phone: 207-773-8171

Toll Free: 800-761-7181

Email: newsroom@wrightexpress.com

URL: www.wrightexpress.com

Directors

Michael E. Dubyak 

Robert C. Cornett 

Senior Vice President, Human Resources 

Hilary A. Rapkin 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary

Richard K. Stecklair 

Senior Vice President, Corporate Payment Solutions

Transfer Agent

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Offi cer 

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company

of Wright Express Corporation

Rowland T. Moriarty

President and Chief Executive Offi cer

of Cubex Corporation

Shikhar Ghosh 

The Harvard Business School

Ronald T. Maheu 

59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level

New York, NY 10038

866-668-6550

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP

200 Berkeley Street

Boston, MA 02116-5022

617-437-2000

Financial and Business Consultant

Attorneys

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Larry McTavish 

Chief Executive Offi cer and Chairman

of Source Medical Corporation

Kirk Pond 

Former Chairman, President and CEO 

of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.

Regina O. Sommer 

Financial and Business Consultant 

Jack A. VanWoerkom

Executive Vice President, General Counsel 

and Corporate Secretary of The Home Depot, Inc.

Executive Offi cers

Michael E. Dubyak 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Offi cer 

Melissa D. Smith

60 State Street

Boston, MA 02109

617-526-6000

Stockholders’ Meeting

Date: May 15, 2009

Time: 8:00 a.m.

Location: Wright Express Long Creek Campus

225 Gorham Road 

South Portland, Maine 04106

Phone: 207-773-8171

Toll Free: 800-761-7181

Ticker Symbol: 

NYSE WXS

Investor Relations

Steve Elder

Vice President, Corporate Finance

866-230-1633

Chief Financial Offi cer and Executive Vice President, 

Email: steve_elder@wrightexpress.com

Finance and Operations

Form 10-K

David D. Maxsimic 

A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K, fi led with the Securities and

Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing

Exchange Commission, is available without charge upon written 

Jamie Morin

request to: Wright Express Corporation, Investor Relations, 97 Darling 

Avenue, South Portland, ME 04106; by calling 866-230-1633; or by 

Senior Vice President, Client Services Organization

emailing investors@wrightexpress.com. The most recent certifi cations 

George Hogan

by our principal executive and fi nancial offi cers pursuant to Section 

302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are fi led as exhibits to our

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Offi cer 

Form 10-K.

34995_Cover   4

34995_Cover   4

3/28/09   2:16:19 AM

3/28/09   2:16:19 AM

 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

97 DARLING AVENUE

SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106

PHONE: 207.773.8171

TOLL FREE: 800.761.7181

EMAIL: NEWSROOM@WRIGHTEXPRESS.COM

URL: WWW.WRIGHTEXPRESS.COM

34995_Cover   2

34995_Cover   2

3/28/09   2:16:18 AM

3/28/09   2:16:18 AM