Quarterlytics / Technology / Software - Infrastructure / WEX / FY2009 Annual Report

WEX
Annual Report 2009

WEX · NYSE Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker WEX
Exchange NYSE
Sector Technology
Industry Software - Infrastructure
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2009 Annual Report · WEX
Loading PDF…
ANNUAL REPORT ‘09

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

97 DARLING AVENUE

SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106

PHONE: (207) 773-8171

TOLL FREE: (800) 761-7181

NEWSROOM@WRIGHTEXPRESS.COM

WWW.WRIGHTEXPRESS.COM

37053_CVR.indd   1

37053_CVR.indd   1

3/23/10   11:43:35 AM

3/23/10   11:43:35 AM

FROM THE BEGINNING
 OF OUR HISTORY, 
WRIGHT EXPRESS 
HAS HAD A VISION
BUILT ON RELATIONSHIPS. 

ABOUT WRIGHT EXPRESS

Wright Express is a leading global provider of payment 

of the nation’s retail fuel locations and over 45,000 vehicle 

processing and information management services. 

maintenance locations. Our proprietary software gives 

Wright Express captures and combines transaction 

fl eets the ability to control purchases in the fi eld, and 

information from its proprietary network with specialized 

delivers comprehensive information and analysis tools 

analytical tools and purchasing control capabilities in a 

that allow fl eets to effectively manage their operations 

suite of solutions that enable  fl eets to manage their 

and reduce costs.

vehicles more effectively. The Company’s charge cards are 

used by commercial and government fl eets to purchase 

fuel and maintenance services for approximately 4.6 

million vehicles. 

In addition to our proprietary closed network, we also 

utilize MasterCard’s open network to issue a Wright 

Express branded corporate MasterCard. This product 

offering provides customers with a payment processing 

Wright Express markets its services directly to fl eets and 

solution for their non-vehicle related corporate purchasing 

as an outsourcing partner for its strategic relationships 

and transaction monitoring needs and allows Wright 

and franchisees. The Company’s business portfolio 

Express to be a single source for all of a company’s 

includes a MasterCard-branded corporate card as 

payment processing and purchasing information 

well as TelaPoint, a provider of supply chain software 

management needs.

solutions for petroleum distributors and retailers, and 

Pacifi c Pride, an independent fuel distributor franchisee 

network, as well as international subsidiaries.

For more than 25 years we have built our proprietary 

closed network to have site acceptance at over 90 percent 

Wright Express Stock is traded on the New York Stock 

Exchange under the ticker symbol “WXS.”

DIRECTORS
Michael E. Dubyak 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive 
Offi cer of Wright Express Corporation

Rowland T. Moriarty
President and Chief Executive Offi cer 
of Cubex Corporation

Shikhar Ghosh 
The Harvard Business School

Ronald T. Maheu 
Financial and Business Consultant

Larry McTavish 
Chief Executive Offi cer and Chairman 
of Source Medical Corporation

Kirk Pond 
Former Chairman, President and CEO 
of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.

Regina O. Sommer 
Financial and Business Consultant 

Jack A. VanWoerkom
Executive Vice President, General 
Counsel and Corporate Secretary of 
The Home Depot, Inc.

TRANSFER AGENT
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
866-668-6550

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED 
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
617-437-2000

ATTORNEYS
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
617-526-6000

STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING
Date: May 21, 2010
Time: 8:00 a.m.

Location: Wright Express Long Creek Campus
225 Gorham Road
South Portland, Maine
Phone: 207-773-8171
Toll Free: 800-761-7181

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Michael E. Dubyak 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Offi cer 

TICKER SYMBOL:
NYSE WXS

Melissa D. Smith
Chief Financial Offi cer and Executive 
Vice President, Finance and Operations

David D. Maxsimic 
Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing

Robert C. Cornett 
Senior Vice President, Human Resources 

George Hogan
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Offi cer 

Jamie Morin
Senior Vice President, Client Services Organization

Hilary A. Rapkin 
Senior Vice President, General Counsel 
and Corporate Secretary

Richard K. Stecklair
Senior Vice President, Corporate Payment Solutions

Gregory S. Strzegowski
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development

INVESTOR RELATIONS
Steve Elder
Vice President, Corporate Finance
866-230-1633
Email: steve_elder@wrightexpress.com

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
Wright Express Corporation
97 Darling Avenue
South Portland, ME 04106
Phone: 207-773-8171
Toll Free: 800-761-7181
Email: newsroom@wrightexpress.com
URL: www.wrightexpress.com

FORM 10-K
A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K, fi led with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission, is available  
without charge upon written request to: Wright Express 
Corporation, Investor Relations, 97 Darling Avenue, 
South Portland, ME 04106; by calling 866-230-1633; 
or by emailing investors@wrightexpress.com.

37053_CVR.indd   2

37053_CVR.indd   2

3/23/10   11:43:52 AM

3/23/10   11:43:52 AM

2009 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

394

318

336

291

240

250

277

260

3,083

2,405

1,845

1,301

06

07

08

09

06

07

08

09

06

07

08

09

TOTAL REVENUE
($ IN MILLIONS)

TOTAL FUEL TRANSACTIONS 
PROCESSED (IN MILLIONS)

MASTERCARD PURCHASES 
($ IN MILLIONS)

KEY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS & RECONCILIATION OF GAAP NET INCOME

(in thousands) 

Revenue 

GAAP net income 

Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income to Adjusted Net Income

GAAP net income 

Gain on extinguishment of liability 

Non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments

on derivative instruments 

Acquisition amortization 

Asset impairment charge 

Non-cash adjustments related to tax receivable agreement 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2009 

2008 

2007

$318,224 

139,659 

$ 

$ 

393,582 

127,640  

$ 

$ 

336,128

51,577

139,659 

$ 

127,640 

$ 

51,577

(136,485) 

— 

—

43,142 

5,066 

814 

599 

(90,892) 

4,854 

1,538 

— 

37,074

1,089

—

—

Tax impact   

Adjusted Net Income 

32,821 

31,008 

(13,730) 

$ 

85,616 

$ 

74,148 

$ 

76,010 

Although adjusted net income is not calculated in accordance with generally 

(cid:129)  The non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments on derivative instruments are 

accepted accounting principles (GAAP), this measure is integral to the 

diffi cult to forecast accurately, making comparisons across historical and 

Company’s reporting and planning processes. The Company considers this 

future quarters diffi cult to evaluate; and

measure integral because it eliminates the non-cash volatility associated with the 

derivative instruments, and excludes the amortization of purchased intangibles, the 

net impact of tax rate changes on the Company’s deferred tax asset and related 

changes in the tax-receivable agreement, non-cash asset impairment charges 

and the gains on the extinguishment of a portion of the tax receivable agreement. 

Specifi cally, in addition to evaluating the Company’s performance on a GAAP 

basis, management evaluates the Company’s performance on a basis that 

excludes the above items because: 

(cid:129)  Exclusion of the non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments on derivative 

instruments helps management identify and assess trends in the Company’s 

underlying business that might otherwise be obscured due to quarterly 

non-cash earnings fl uctuations associated with fuel-price derivative 

contracts; 

(cid:129)  The extinguishment of the liability is not indicative of the Company’s 

ongoing performance. 

(cid:129)  The amortization of purchased intangibles and asset impairment have no 

impact on the operations of the business. 

For the same reasons, Wright Express believes that adjusted net income 

may also be useful to investors as one means of evaluating the Company’s 

performance. However, because adjusted net income is a non-GAAP measure, 

it should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, net income, 

as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, adjusted net income as 

used by Wright Express may not be comparable to similarly titled measures 

employed by other companies. 

The tax impact of the foregoing adjustments is the difference between the 

Company’s GAAP tax provision and a pro forma tax provision based upon the 

Company’s adjusted net income before taxes. The methodology utilized for 

calculating the Company’s adjusted net income tax provision is the same 

methodology utilized in calculating the Company’s GAAP tax provision. 

37053_EDS.indd   1

37053_EDS.indd   1

3/23/10   12:11:37 PM

3/23/10   12:11:37 PM

Wright Express Annual Report 2009

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FELLOW STOCKHOLDERS
Wright Express capitalized on its strategic and 

competitive advantages and produced excellent 

results during a challenging year. After remaining 

solidly profi table through the depths of the recession 

in 2008, we were determined to deliver another strong 

year in 2009, even in the absence of a sustained  
economic recovery. We also were determined to 

continue investing in our growth strategies and  

thus position Wright Express to outperform the 

industry when the economy turns around. We 

believe we accomplished both of these goals.

Since the slowdown in fl eet activity began more 

than two years ago, we have not once wavered 

from our commitment to strengthen our customer 

value proposition and be relentless  in adding 

new business. As a result, in  2009 we were able 

to help offset the recession-driven contraction 

37053_EDS.indd   2

37053_EDS.indd   2

3/23/10   12:11:38 PM

3/23/10   12:11:38 PM

in our installed customer base and attrition by 

Our goals for these investments in diversifi cation 

adding nearly 500,000 new fleet vehicles to our  

were to develop new revenue streams and growth 

portfolio. Essentially, we held total vehicle count 

opportunities for the Company while creating more 

steady at a time when fl eet operators across the 

value for the core customers in our fl eet markets. 

country were scaling back their operations. 

In aggregate, our diversifi ed businesses contributed 

While we managed our way through a tough  

nearly $61 million – or roughly 19% of our total  
revenue – in 2009, compared with $49 million, or  

environment in our core fl eet markets in 2009, 

12% of total revenue, in 2008. 

our investments in diversifi cation continued to 

become increasingly important to our growth. In 

Our MasterCard segment is exceeding our  

the past two years we have aggressively expanded 

expectations. Annual MasterCard purchase 

our MasterCard business and strengthened our 

volume reached $2.4 billion for the first time  

presence in the distributor channel by acquiring  

during 2008, and then grew another 28% to $ 3.1 

Pacifi c Pride. In addition, the global business  we 

billion by the end of 2009. An expanding customer 

launched by creating Wright Express International 

base is steadily increasing its usage of our  

has opened the door to signifi cant future processing 

MasterCard corporate purchasing card, which has 

opportunities with major oil companies outside the 

created cross-selling opportunities that make it a 

United States. 

great complement to our core fl eet business. Our 

37053_EDS.indd   3

37053_EDS.indd   3

3/26/10   2:33:07 PM

3/26/10   2:33:07 PM

Wright Express Annual Report 2009

3

DIVERSIFYING REVENUE BEYOND OUR CORE FLEET BUSINESS

Major components of diversifi ed revenue include MasterCard, Pacifi c Pride, TelaPoint 
and International revenue.

R E V E N U E

$ 7 0 , 0 0 0

$ 6 0 , 0 0 0

$ 5 0 , 0 0 0

$ 4 0 , 0 0 0

$ 3 0 , 0 0 0

$ 2 0 , 0 0 0

$ 1 0 , 0 0 0

$ 0

06

07

08

09

4

37053_EDS.indd   4

37053_EDS.indd   4

3/26/10   4:38:42 PM

3/26/10   4:38:42 PM

MasterCard single use account product has grown 

In addition to focusing on the front end of our fl eet 

even faster, driven by continued expansion in the 

business and diversifying our revenues, we worked 

online travel and automotive warranty markets. We 

hard to improve the credit quality of  our fl eet 

see additional potential for the single use account 

portfolio in 2009. Our objectives in this effort were 

product in some new vertical markets where we 

to continue offering 30-day credit terms to most 

are now testing its applicability. 

of our customers while managing bad debt and, 
at the same time, maintaining strong customer  

Wright Express International created traction and 

satisfaction which was refl ected in our 2.2% 

made good progress in 2009. A number of major oil 

voluntary attrition results. Despite the persistent 

companies with operations in Europe and the Asia 

challenges in the credit markets, we succeeded 

Pacifi c region are considering a shift to outsourced 

in both respects. Our credit losses for 2009 were 

transaction processing for their fl eet card portfolios. 

We are pursuing these opportunities aggressively 

by working with them to convert their portfolios to 

squarely within our historical range, as was our 
voluntary attrition rate, at a time when many other 
companies were reporting historic high levels of bad 

our processing platform. It will take several years, 

debt and voluntary attrition. 

however, to build out and implement additional oil 
company portfolios and deliver on the full potential 
for predictable and recurring revenue we believe 

Our universal proprietary closed network, which 

reaches more than 180,000 fueling and service  

the international business represents. 

locations, coupled with our proprietary software 

37053_EDS.indd   5

37053_EDS.indd   5

3/23/10   12:12:38 PM

3/23/10   12:12:38 PM

Wright Express Annual Report 2009 5

and web products, enables us  to provide our 

our obligation to Realogy. As a result, Wright 

customers with a comprehensive fl eet fueling 

Express begins 2010 in a strong position fi nancially, 

and service network, as well as fl eet managed 

which equips us to pursue all available options for 

customized analytical tools. 

generating the highest possible return on our cash 

Wright Express is strategically and competitively 
positioned as we begin 2010. We  have the 

fl ow. Higher returns start with strong performance 

on the top line. We also used our cash to fund  
capital expenditures totaling $18 million in 2009, 

advantage of a unique financing model that  

representing a signifi cant further investment in our 

provides our customers – the majority of which are 

growth strategy and demonstrating our ability 

small businesses – with exceptionally low-cost and 

to out-perform the competition. Consequently, 

fl exible fi nancing for their fl eet operations. Even 

our new business pipeline in the fl eet segment is 

during the fi nancial crisis in 2009, Wright Express 

strong, and the marketing campaigns we launched 

was approving over 70% of fl eet applications and 

extended $374 million of new credit lines, primarily 

to small businesses.

In 2009, we used our cash to pay down $43 million 
in debt, bought back $6 million of our common 
stock, and paid $51 million as a settlement of  

in 2009 have the potential to drive even  more 
organic vehicle and transaction growth in the years 
ahead. We expect to see continued rapid expansion 

in our MasterCard business in 2010 and, in the longer 

term, we anticipate that Wright Express International 

will contribute to our growth, as well. 

6

37053_EDS.indd   6

37053_EDS.indd   6

3/26/10   1:44:21 PM

3/26/10   1:44:21 PM

Fuel Desk Solutions

Price Risk Management Solutions

AP Direct, Purchase Log Web Services

Roadside Assistance

Employee Screening

Telematics

Reporting

Card Programs

Alerts

Online Features and Functionality

Rewards

We managed our business  successfully and 

aggressively during a challenging year and we  

leveraged our advantages to create an environment 

in which our business will be strongly positioned 

when an economic recovery becomes sustained. In 

the meantime, we will remain focused on executing 
our strategy and serving the best interests of you, 

our stockholders. On behalf of our management 

team and Board of Directors, I’d like to thank you 

for placing your trust in Wright Express. 

Sincerely,

Michael E. Dubyak
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Offi cer
March 23, 2010

37053_EDS.indd   7

37053_EDS.indd   7

7

3/23/10   12:13:05 PM

3/23/10   12:13:05 PM

Top Row, left to right: Robert C. Cornett, Senior Vice President, Human Resources; Richard K. Stecklair, Senior Vice 
President, Corporate Payment Solutions; George Hogan, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Offi cer; Gregory S. 
Strzegowski, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development; Hilary A. Rapkin, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and 
Corporate Secretary. 

Front Row, left to right: Jamie Morin, Senior Vice President, Client Services Organization; David D. Maxsimic, Executive 
Vice President, Sales and Marketing; Michael E. Dubyak, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Offi cer; Melissa D. 
Smith, Chief Financial Offi cer and Executive Vice President, Finance and Operations.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Except for the historical information, statements contained in this annual report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning 
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Achieving the results described involves a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors 
that could cause actual results to differ materially, as discussed in Wright Express’ fi lings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the 
attached Form 10-K. The following factors, among others, could cause results to differ from those contained in forward-looking statements made in 
this Annual Report: fuel price volatility; the Company’s failure to maintain or renew key agreements; failure to expand the Company’s technological 
capabilities and service offerings as rapidly as the Company’s competitors; the actions of regulatory bodies, including bank regulators, or possible 
changes in banking regulations impacting the Company’s industrial loan bank and the Company as the corporate parent; the uncertainties of litigation; 
the effects of general economic conditions on fueling patterns and the commercial activity of fl eets; the effects of the Company’s international business 
expansion efforts; the impact and range of credit losses; the amount of interest rates; fi nancial loss if we determine it necessary to unwind our derivative 
instrument position prior to the expiration of the contract, as well as other risks and uncertainties identifi ed in item 14 of the attached Form 10-K. We 
disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

8

37053_EDS.indd   08

37053_EDS.indd   08

3/23/10   12:13:17 PM

3/23/10   12:13:17 PM

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph assumes $100 invested on February 16, 2005, the date of the Company’s initial public offering, 

and compares (a) the percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total stockholder return on the common stock 

(as measured by dividing (i) the sum of (A) the cumulative amount of dividends, assuming dividend reinvestment, 

during  the  period  commencing  February  16,  2005,  and  ending  on  December  31,  2009,  and  (B)  the  difference 

between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the periods presented by (ii) the share price at 

the beginning of the periods presented) with (b) (i) the Russell 2000 Index and (ii) the S&P 500® Data Processing & 

Outsourced Services.

Total Return Performance

250

200

150

100

50

02/16/05

12/31/05

12/31/06

12/31/07

12/31/08

12/31/09

Index 

02/16/05 

12/31/05  12/31/06  12/31/07  12/31/08  12/31/09

Wright Express Corporation 

100.00 

128.65 

182.28 

207.54 

73.68 

186.32

Russell 2000 

100.00 

106.52 

126.08 

124.11 

82.17 

104.50

S&P Data Processing and Outsourced Services 

100.00 

113.67 

125.44 

128.05 

89.43 

120.41

Period Ending 

Source : SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA © 2010

 
 
 
UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 10-K 

 (Mark One) 
(cid:2) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 

OR

(cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from 

to

Commission file number  001-32426 

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization) 

97 Darling Avenue 
South Portland, Maine
(Address of principal executive offices) 

01-0526993 
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification No.) 

04106 
(Zip Code) 

(207) 773-8171 
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class 

Name of each exchange on which registered 

Common Stock, $0.01 par value 

New York Stock Exchange 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None 
(Title of class) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 

(cid:3)   Yes 

(cid:2)   No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 

(cid:3)   Yes 

(cid:2)   No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

(cid:2)   Yes 

(cid:3)   No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every

Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) 
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 

(cid:3)   Yes 

(cid:3)   No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not 

contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
(cid:2)         
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller 
reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of 
the Exchange Act. (Check one): 

Large accelerated filer  (cid:2) 

Accelerated filer  (cid:3) 

Non-accelerated filer  (cid:3) 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 

Smaller reporting company  (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). 

(cid:3)   Yes 

(cid:2)   No 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming for the
purpose of this calculation, but without conceding, that all directors, officers and any 10 percent or greater stockholders are affiliates 
of the registrant) as of June 30, 2009, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
was $962,352,387 (based on the closing price of the registrant's common stock on that date as reported on the New York 
Stock Exchange). 

There were 38,213,657 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of February 23, 2010. 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference 

in Part III. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Forward-Looking Statements 

Business
Risk Factors 
Unresolved Staff Comments 
Properties 
Legal Proceedings 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data 
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 
Controls and Procedures 
Other Information 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 
Executive Compensation 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 
Principal Accounting Fees and Services 

Part I 

Item 1. 
Item 1A. 
Item 1B. 
Item 2. 
Item 3. 
Item 4. 

Part II 

Item 5. 
Item 6. 
Item 7. 
Item 7A. 
Item 8. 
Item 9. 
Item 9A. 
Item 9B. 

Part III 

Item 10. 
Item 11. 
Item 12. 
Item 13. 
Item 14. 

Part IV 

Item 15. 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 

Signatures 

Page

1

1
10
15
15
15
15

16
17
18
37
39
76
76
76

77
77
77
77
77

78

81

All references to "we," "us," "our," "Wright Express," or the "Company," in the Annual Report on Form 10-K mean 

Wright Express Corporation and all entities owned or controlled by Wright Express Corporation, except where it is clear that the
term means only Wright Express Corporation. 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for statements that are forward-looking and are 
not statements of historical facts. The "Outlook for the Future" section of this Annual Report in Item 7, among other sections, contains 
forward-looking statements. Any statements that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking 
statements. When used in this Annual Report, the words "may," "will," "could," "anticipate," "plan," "continue," "project," "intend," 
"estimate," "believe," "expect" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-
looking statements contain such words. Forward-looking statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions 
and are not historical facts and accordingly involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause the 
actual results or performance to be materially different from future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-
looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report, in press releases and in oral statements made by our authorized officers:  fuel 
price volatility; the Company’s failure to maintain or renew key agreements; failure to expand the Company’s technological 
capabilities and service offerings as rapidly as the Company’s competitors; the actions of regulatory bodies, including bank 
regulators, or possible changes in banking regulations impacting the Company’s industrial loan bank and the Company as the 
corporate parent; the uncertainties of litigation; the effects of general economic conditions on fueling patterns and the commercial 
activity of fleets; the effects of the Company’s international business expansion efforts; the impact and range of first quarter and full 
year credit losses; the amount of full year interest rates, financial loss if we determine it necessary to unwind our derivative
instrument position prior to the expiration of the contract, as well as other risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A of this Annual 
Report. Our forward-looking statements and these factors do not reflect the potential future impact of any merger, acquisition or 
disposition. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the initial filing of this Annual Report and undue reliance
should not be placed on these statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. 

PART I 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS 

Our Company 

Wright Express Corporation, founded in 1983, is a leading provider of payment processing and information management 
products and services to the United States commercial and government vehicle fleet industry. We provide our products and services in 
the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Europe. Together with our affiliates, we market our products and services
directly, as well as through more than 150 strategic relationships which include major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle
maintenance providers. We also offer a MasterCard-branded corporate card.  

On February 16, 2005, Wright Express LLC converted into Wright Express Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and 
100 percent of the ownership interests in Wright Express LLC were converted into 40 million shares of common stock and 100 shares
of non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock. On the same day, our former corporate parent sold all 40 million shares of 
common stock in an initial public offering ("IPO") and all 100 shares of non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock in a
private placement. 

Our wholly owned banking subsidiary, Wright Express Financial Services Corporation ("FSC"), a Utah industrial bank, was 

established in 1998. FSC approves the customer applications, issues the card and owns the customer relationships for most of our fuel 
and maintenance programs and offers our MasterCard-branded corporate payment solution. Wright Express Canada Ltd. 
("WEXCanada") was incorporated in January 2007 as a wholly owned subsidiary of FSC to assist us in funding transactions with 
Canadian companies. 

In addition to the companies described above, we have expanded our business through the acquisition of the following entities: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

We acquired TelaPoint, Inc. ("TelaPoint") on August 6, 2007. TelaPoint is a provider of browser-based supply chain 
software solutions for bulk petroleum distributors, retailers and fleets. 

We acquired the net assets of Pacific Pride Services, Inc. and converted it into Pacific Pride Services, LLC ("Pacific 
Pride") on February 29, 2008. Pacific Pride is an independent fuel distributor franchisee network, encompassing more 
than 325 independent fuel franchisees. 

1

(cid:2)

We acquired the net assets of Financial Automation Limited, a provider of fuel card processing software solutions 
located in New Zealand, on August 29, 2008. Concurrent with the acquisition of Financial Automation Limited, we 
established a structure for international operations ("Wright Express International"). 

Our Company is organized under two segments, Fleet and MasterCard. The Fleet segment represents 88 percent of our total 

revenue. The Fleet segment of our business provides customers with payment processing services specifically designed for the needs 
of vehicle fleet industries. Revenue is earned primarily from payment processing, account servicing revenue and transaction 
processing, with the majority generated by payment processing. The MasterCard segment of our business provides customers with a
payment processing solution for their corporate purchasing and transaction monitoring needs. 

We believe the following strengths distinguish us in our industry:  

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

We are a leading provider of payment processing and information management services. Our charge cards are used by 
commercial and government fleets to purchase fuel and maintenance services for approximately 4.6 million vehicles.
We have long-standing strategic relationships with each of the six largest fleet management companies and automotive 
manufacturers, over 790 fuel retailers and fuel distributors, convenience store chains and bulk and mobile fuel 
providers. We believe that our sales strategy of utilizing both our own sales force of approximately 110 salespersons in 
collaboration with the salespersons of the companies with which we maintain strategic relationships provides us with 
the ability to attract new customers nationwide.  

During the last 25 years, we have built a network of over 180,000 fuel and vehicle maintenance locations, with site 
acceptance at over 90% of the nation’s retail fuel locations and over 45,000 vehicle maintenance locations. We believe 
our network is one of the largest closed fuel and vehicle maintenance networks of its kind, which allows us to offer 
customers broad site acceptance. Our proprietary closed network (see illustration on page 3) also affords us access to a 
higher level of fleet-specific information and control than is widely available on the networks of MasterCard, Visa, 
American Express or Discover, which allows us to improve and refine the information reporting we provide to our 
fleet customers and strategic relationships.  

With our ownership of FSC, we have excellent access to low cost sources of capital. 

We offer a differentiated set of products and services to allow our customers and the customers of our strategic 
relationships to better manage their vehicle fleets.  

We provide customized analysis and reporting on the efficiency of fleet vehicles and the purchasing behavior of fleet 
vehicle drivers. We make this data available to fleet customers through both traditional reporting services and 
sophisticated Internet-based data analysis tools.  

Our proprietary software facilitates the collection of information and affords us a high level of control and flexibility 
in allowing fleets to restrict purchases and delivering automated alerts.  

Through our WEXOnline® Internet website, customers have access to account and purchase control management, 
data, reporting and analysis tools in order to better monitor and maintain fleets.  

Strategy 

Our strategy is to leverage our core competitive strengths – sales and marketing, portfolio management, customer service and 

product differentiation – to acquire and retain customers and to create products that add value by satisfying new and existing 
customers' needs. 

Our strategic initiatives include: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Increase market share.   We intend to leverage our proprietary network and our knowledge of our industry to increase 
our share in the marketplace. We expect to utilize existing and new marketing channels, along with additional 
outsourced strategic relationships and added product features including, but not limited to, web-based account 
management and distributor-specific product offerings. 

Leverage our existing customer base and cross-sell our products.  We have approximately 280,000 customers. We 
will continue to leverage this existing customer base by cross-selling our products to them. These cross-selling 
opportunities include, but are not limited to, the supply chain software offered by our TelaPoint subsidiary and our 
vehicle-based telematics offering, which we refer to as WEXSmartTM. We continue to develop additional products and 
services to expand our customer offerings. 

2

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Penetrate international markets.  We have over 25 years of experience as a provider of payment and transaction 
processing services in the United States fleet industry. We expect to draw on this experience, along with our existing 
industry relationships and brand recognition, to grow our international presence initially through our investment in 
Wright Express International. 

Increase market share for corporate charge card.   We intend to further penetrate commercial and government 
prospects in the mid range of the corporate card marketplace. Additionally we intend to leverage our fleet relationships 
and cross-sell our Corporate MasterCard charge card to offer a total corporate payment solution to companies. 

FLEET SEGMENT 

We have created one of the largest proprietary payment processing networks in the United States. We collect a broad array of 
information at the point of sale including the amount of the expenditure, the identity of the driver and vehicle, the odometer reading, 
the identity of the fuel or vehicle maintenance provider and the items purchased. We use this information to provide customers with 
purchase controls and analytical tools to help them effectively manage their vehicle fleets and control costs. We deliver value to our 
customers by providing customized offerings with accepting merchants, processing payments and providing information management 
products and services to our fleets. 

Our payment processing network, which is deployed at fuel and maintenance locations that use our proprietary software, is 

referred to as closed network because we have a direct contractual relationship with the merchant and the fleet; only Wright Express 
transactions can be processed in this network. 

The following illustrates our proprietary closed network: 

Wright
Express

Direct relationship with fleet 
and merchant 

Merchant 

Fleet

Fleet
driver 

Products and Services 

Payment processing

In a payment processing transaction we pay the purchase price for the fleet customer's transaction, less the payment processing
fees we retain, to the fuel or vehicle maintenance provider, and we collect the total purchase price from the fleet customer, most often 
within one month from the billing date. Payment processing fees are typically based on a combination of both a percentage of the
aggregate dollar amount of the customer's purchase and a fixed amount charged per transactions or on a percentage of the aggregate
dollar amount of the customer’s purchase alone. In 2009, we had approximately 204 million payment processing transactions. 

Transaction processing

In a transaction processing transaction we earn a fixed fee per transaction. We processed nearly 56 million transaction 

processing transactions in 2009. 

3

The following illustration depicts our business process for a typical payment processing transaction: 

In most transaction processing transactions, steps 3 and 4 typically do not apply. However, data capture and information 

management remain an important part of the value proposition for fleets for whom we perform transaction processing. 

Account management 

We also provide the following account management services: 

(cid:116)

(cid:116)

(cid:116)

(cid:116)

(cid:116)

Customer service, account activation and account retention.  We offer customer service, account activation and 
account retention services to fleets, fleet management companies and automotive manufacturers (collectively, 
“strategic relationships”) and the fuel and vehicle maintenance providers on our network. Our services include 
promoting the adoption and use of our products and programs and account retention programs on behalf of our private 
label partners. 

Authorization and billing inquiries and account maintenance.  We handle authorization and billing questions, account 
changes and other issues for fleets through our dedicated customer contact center, which is available 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week. Fleet customers also have self service options available to them through WEXOnline®.

Premium fleet services.  We assign designated account managers to businesses and government agencies with large 
fleets. These representatives have in-depth knowledge of both our programs and the operations and objectives of the 
fleets they service. 

Credit and collections services.  We have developed proprietary account approval, credit management and fraud 
detection programs. Our underwriting model produces a proprietary score, which we use to predict the likelihood of an 
account becoming delinquent within 12 months of activation. We also use a credit line maintenance model to manage 
ongoing accounts, which allows us to predict the likelihood of account delinquency over an on-going 18 month time 
horizon. We have developed a collections scoring model that we use to rank and prioritize past due accounts for 
collection activities. We also employ fraud specialists who monitor, alert and provide case management expertise to 
minimize losses and reduce program abuse. 

Merchant services.  Our representatives work with fuel and vehicle maintenance providers to enroll them in our 
network, certify all network and terminal software and hardware, and train them on our sale, transaction authorization 
and settlement processes. 

4

Information management

We provide standard and customized information to customers through monthly vehicle analysis reports, custom reports and 
our website, WEXOnline®. We also alert the customer to any unusual transactions or transactions that fall outside of pre-established 
parameters. Customers can access their account information, including account history and recent transactions, and download the
details. In addition, through WEXOnline®, fleet managers can elect to be notified by email when limits are exceeded in specified 
purchase categories, including limits on transactions within a time range and gallons per day. Utilizing our WEXSmartTM product 
which leverages telematics, a vehicle system that combines global positioning satellite tracking and other wireless technology, fleet 
managers can track the movements and the locations of their vehicles. We generally recognize revenue from these services under 
account servicing revenue. 

Marketing Channels 

United States 

We market our payment processing and information management products and services to fleets directly and indirectly. Our 
experienced inside and outside sales forces and our marketing team, which has expertise in direct marketing, database analysis and
marketing strategy and execution, facilitate our sales and marketing efforts. We also utilize industry tradeshows, advertising and other 
awareness campaigns to market our services. By collecting and analyzing customer data acquired for more than 25 years, we have 
created a detailed profile of representative fleet customers and have also developed a proprietary database that allows us to better
market to the fleet industry. We provide market opportunity analyses, customer acquisition models and detailed marketing plans to our 
sales force and the sales forces of companies with which we have co-branded, affinity, distributor or private label relationships.

Direct

We market our products and services, branded with the Wright Express name, directly to commercial and government vehicle 

fleets, which allows us to have a direct relationship with our fleet customers. These direct customers include fleets of all sizes and 
vehicle categories. We use our inside sales force to attract small fleets, such as contracting, landscaping and plumbing businesses. Our 
mid-size fleet customers are typically regional businesses, such as dairies, beverage companies and grocery chains. We use our outside 
sales force to market to these customers. Our large fleet customers consist of national and large regional fleets. In marketing our 
products and services to these customers, we emphasize our ability to offer national site acceptance, a high level of customer service,
and on-line tools to monitor, control and customize their fleet management capabilities. To attract and retain large fleet customers, we 
use both our outside sales force, focused on the acquisition of new customers, and internal account managers, who focus on servicing 
and growing revenue from existing customers. 

Indirect

We market our products and services indirectly through co-branded, affinity, distributor and private label relationships. 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Co-branded.  Through our co-branded relationships, we market our products and services for, and in collaboration 
with, fleet management companies, automotive manufacturers, fuel providers and convenience store chains using their 
brand names and our Wright Express logo. These companies seek to offer our payment processing and information 
management services to their fleet customers. 

We use our co-branded relationships to reach all sizes of fleet customers. We are able to expand the base of customers 
to whom we provide our products and services by combining the marketing and sales efforts of our own sales force 
with the efforts of the sales forces of our co-branded partners. 

Affinity.  Similar to the co-branded relationships, our affinity relationships are marketed in collaboration with fuel 
providers and convenience store chains. The products and services we deliver are designed to foster loyalty to the fuel 
provider or convenience store chain as the program is marketed as their own. However, these products allow for the 
same level of payment processing and information management products and services as are received by the 
companies using our co-branded programs. 

Distributor.  Through our distributor relationships, we market our products and services via a network of independent 
Pacific Pride fuel franchisees. Franchisees issue their own Pacific Pride commercial fueling cards to fleet customers. 
Vehicles in this program have access to fuel at Pacific Pride and strategic partner locations in the United States and 
Canada. We increase penetration to these customers by leveraging Pacific Pride's local market presence and brand 
recognition, as well as its platform and products for commercial and government fleets. We also service distributors 
through the Wright Express Distributor program, which provides fuel merchants with payment processing and 
information management products and services for their own fleets. 

5

(cid:2)

Private Label.  We market our product and services for, and in collaboration with, fuel retailers, using only their brand 
names. The fuel retailers with which we have formed strategic relationships offer our payment processing and 
information management product and services to their fleet customers in order to establish and enhance customer 
loyalty. These fleets use these product and services to purchase fuel at locations of the fuel retailer with whom we have 
the private label relationship. Private label customers are typically small fleets. The fleet drivers often do not travel 
beyond a defined geographic area and are not unduly burdened by limiting their fuel purchases to the fuel locations of 
a particular fuel retailer within that area. We primarily rely on the marketing efforts of our private label relationships 
to attract customers; however, many of these fuel retailers also rely on our sales and marketing expertise to further 
their efforts. 

International 

Our international operations include an office in New Zealand and various locations in Europe. We have fuel card processing 

software solutions that give us a presence that we can leverage in geographic markets around the world. We are developing long term 
relationships with oil companies to manage their fleet specific payment processing and information management service offerings.

Our international strategy is to offer a hosting solution where we process fueling transactions for a fee for each transaction. Our 

international marketing team is actively seeking out major oil companies and responding to requests for information. As we add 
clients and transaction volume, we plan to offer services similar to our product offering in North America. We believe our services
maximize the value of our clients’ portfolios. The value proposition that Wright Express International offers is based on the benefits 
and value it delivers in satisfying the oil companies' strategic objectives, including improved market effectiveness and cost efficiency.  

Fuel Price Derivatives 

A significant portion of our total revenues result from fees paid to us by fuel and vehicle maintenance providers based on a 

negotiated percentage of the purchase price paid by customers. Because our customers primarily purchase fuel, our revenues are 
largely dependent on retail fuel prices, which are prone to significant volatility. 

We own fuel price sensitive derivative instruments to manage the impact of volatility in fuel prices on our cash flows and 
enhance the visibility and predictability of future cash flows. We have entered into put and call option contracts ("Options") indexed to 
the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline and retail price of diesel fuel and which contain monthly settlement provisions. When 
entering into the Options, our intent is to effectively lock in a range of prices during any given quarter on a portion of our forecasted 
earnings that are subject to fuel price variations. We have estimated the effect on our forecasted earnings exposure associated with 
changes in fuel prices and entered into derivative agreements designed to cover 80 percent of this estimated impact. In prior years, we 
entered into derivative agreements designed to cover 90 percent of our forecasted earnings exposure. This change was made for all
instruments which will start to settle in 2010. For the portion of 2011 that we have entered into Options, as of December 31, 2009, we 
have achieved approximately 25 percent of the full year's target. Differences between the indices underlying the Options and the actual 
retail prices may create a disparity between the actual revenues we earn and the gains or losses realized on the Options. 

Our derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting under accounting guidance. Accordingly, gains and losses on 

our fuel price sensitive derivative instruments; whether they are realized or unrealized, affect our current period earnings. 

The Options are intended to limit the impact fuel price fluctuations have on our cash flows. The Options that we have entered 

into: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Create a floor price.  When the current month put option contract settles, the Company receives cash payments from 
the counterparties of the Options when the average price for the current month (as defined by the option contract) is 
below the strike price of the put option contract. 

Create a ceiling price.  When the current month call option contract settles, the Company makes cash payments to the 
counterparties of the Options when the average price for the current month (as defined by the option contract) is above 
the strike price of the call option contract. 

6

(cid:2)

Have no cash impact.  When the current month put and call option contracts settle and the average price for the current 
month (as defined by the option contract) is between the strike price of the put option contract and the strike price of 
the call option contract, no cash is exchanged between the Company and the counterparties of the Options. 

The following table presents information about the Options as of December 31, 2009: 

Percentage

(a)

Weighted-Average Price
Ceiling 

Floor 

(b)

For the period January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 
For the period April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 
For the period July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 
For the period October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 
For the period January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 
For the period April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011 

80%  $
80%  $
80%  $
80%  $
53%  $
27%  $

3.25  $
3.17  $
3.03  $
2.69  $
2.72  $
2.74  $

3.31 
3.23 
3.09 
2.75 
2.78 
2.80 

(a) Represents the estimated percentage of the Company's forecasted earnings subject to fuel price variations at the time of purchase.
(b) Weighted-average price is the Company's estimate of the retail price equivalent of the underlying strike price of the fuel price derivatives. 

MASTERCARD SEGMENT 

In addition to our proprietary closed retail fuel and vehicle maintenance network, we also issue corporate MasterCard products.
Our corporate MasterCard charge card product provides commercial travel and entertainment and purchase capabilities to businesses 
in industries that can utilize our information management functionality. The MasterCard product can be sold jointly with the fleet card 
product to offer a total payment solution to companies. Additionally, our single use account MasterCard product allows businesses to 
centralize purchasing, simplify complex supply chain processes and eliminate the paper check writing associated with traditional
purchase order systems.  

Products and Services 

Corporate charge card

Our corporate MasterCard charge card provides commercial travel and entertainment and purchase capabilities to businesses 

that benefit from our information management functionality. The MasterCard product can be sold jointly with the fleet card product to 
offer a total corporate payment solution to companies. 

Single use account

Our single use account MasterCard service allows businesses to centralize purchasing, simplify complex supply chain processes 

and eliminate the paper check writing associated with traditional purchase order programs. Our single use account service is used for 
transactions where no card is presented, including, for example, transactions conducted over the telephone, by mail, fax or on the 
Internet. They also can be used for transactions that require pre-authorization, such as hotel reservations. Under this program, each 
transaction is assigned a unique MasterCard account number and expiration date. These controls are in place to limit fraud and 
unauthorized spending. The unique account number limits purchase amounts, tracks, settles and reconciles purchases more easily,
while eliminating the risks associated with using multiple cards. 

Marketing Channels 

We market our MasterCard-branded corporate payment solutions directly to our customers in conjunction with our fleet 

offerings, as well as potential new clients with whom we have no existing relationship. We leverage the marketing and advertising 
efforts of MasterCard, Inc. Our corporate MasterCard products are marketed to commercial and government organizations. 

Employees 

OTHER ITEMS 

As of December 31, 2009, Wright Express Corporation and its subsidiaries had 725 employees, of which, 687 were located in 

the United States. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. 

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Competition 

We have a strong competitive position in our Fleet and MasterCard segments. Our product features and extensive account 

management services are key factors behind our position in the fleet industry. We face considerable competition in both of our 
operating segments. Our competitors vie with us for prospective direct fleet customers as well as for companies with which we form 
strategic relationships. We compete with companies that perform payment and transaction processing or similar services. Financial
institutions that issue Visa, MasterCard and American Express credit and charge cards currently compete against us primarily in the 
small fleet category of our Fleet segment and in the corporate charge card category of our MasterCard segment. 

The most significant competitive factors are breadth of features, functionality, servicing capability and price. For more 

information regarding risks related to competition, see the information in Item 1A, under the heading "Our industry continues to
become increasingly competitive, which makes it more difficult for us to maintain profit margins at historical levels." 

Technology 

We believe investment in technology is a crucial step in enhancing our competitive position in the market place. Our 
proprietary software captures comprehensive information from the more than 180,000 fuel and maintenance locations within our 
network. Operating a proprietary network not only enhances our value proposition, it enables us to avoid dependence on third-party 
processors in the Fleet segment and to respond rapidly to changing customer needs with system upgrades and new specifications, 
while maintaining our security in a SAS 70 certified environment. Our infrastructure has been designed around industry-standard
architectures to reduce downtime in the event of outages or catastrophic occurrences. 

We are continually improving our technology to enhance the customer relationship and to increase efficiency and security. We 
also review technologies and services provided by others in order to maintain the high level of service expected by our customers. For 
information regarding technology related risks, see the information in Item 1A under the headings "Our failure to effectively 
implement new technology could jeopardize our position as a leader in our industry," and "We are dependent on technology systems
and electronic communications networks managed by third parties, which could result in our inability to prevent service disruptions." 

Intellectual Property 

We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions and 
other similar measures to protect proprietary information and technology used in our business. We generally enter into confidentiality
or license agreements with our consultants and corporate partners, and generally control access to and distribution of our technology, 
documentation and other proprietary information. Despite the efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may
attempt to copy or otherwise obtain the use of our products or technology that we consider proprietary and third parties may attempt to 
develop similar technology independently. We pursue registration and protection of our trademarks primarily in the United States.

Regulation 

The Company and FSC are subject to certain state and federal laws and regulations governing insured depository institutions 

and their affiliates. FSC is subject to supervision and examination by both the Utah Department of Financial Institutions and the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company and FSC are also subject to certain restrictions on transactions with affiliates
set forth in the Federal Reserve Act ("FRA"). The Company is subject to anti-tying provisions in the Bank Holding Company Act. 
State and Federal laws and regulations limit the loans FSC may make to one borrower and the types of investments FSC may make. 

Set forth below is a description of the material elements of the laws, regulations, policies and other regulatory matters affecting 

Wright Express. 

Restrictions on intercompany borrowings and transactions

The FRA restricts the extent to which the Company may borrow or otherwise obtain credit from, sell assets to or engage in 

certain other transactions with FSC. In general, these restrictions require that any such extensions of credit by FSC to the parent 
company must be fully secured. There is no limit on such transactions to the extent they are secured by a cash deposit or pledged 
United States government securities. It is also possible to pledge designated amounts of other specified kinds of collateral if the 
aggregate of such transactions are limited to 10 percent of FSC's capital stock and surplus with respect to any single affiliate and to 
20 percent of FSC's capital stock and surplus with respect to all affiliates. 

Restrictions on dividends

The FRA also limits the dividends FSC may pay to the Company. In addition, FSC is subject to various regulatory policies and 
requirements relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain capital above regulatory minimums. A state or 
federal regulatory authority can determine, under certain circumstances relating to the financial condition of a bank, that the payment 

8

of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice and can prohibit payment. FSC may not pay a dividend to the Company if it is
undercapitalized or would become undercapitalized as a result of paying the dividend. Utah law permits an industrial bank to pay
dividends only from undivided earnings. 

Company obligations to FSC

Any non-deposit obligation of FSC to the Company is subordinate, in right of payment, to deposits and other indebtedness of 

FSC. In the event of the Company's bankruptcy, any commitment by the Company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the
capital of FSC will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment. 

Restrictions on ownership of Wright Express common stock

FSC, and therefore the Company, is subject to bank regulations that impose requirements on entities that control 10 percent or 

more of Wright Express common stock. These requirements are discussed in detail in Item 1A under the heading "If any entity 
controls 10 percent or more of our common stock and such entity has caused a violation of applicable banking laws by its failure to 
obtain any required approvals prior to acquiring such common stock, we will have the power to restrict such entity's ability to vote 
such shares." 

Segments and Geographic Information 

For an analysis of financial information about our segments as well as our geographic areas, see Item 8 – Note 21 of our 

consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

Available Information 

The Company's principal executive offices are located at 97 Darling Avenue, South Portland, ME 04106. Our telephone 
number is (207) 773-8171, and our Internet address is http://www.wrightexpress.com. The Company's annual, quarterly and current 
reports, proxy statements and certain other information filed with the SEC, as well as amendments thereto, may be obtained free of 
charge from our web site. These documents are posted to our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we have filed or 
furnished these documents with the SEC. These documents are also available at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, 
NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company's Audit Committee Charter, Compensation 
Committee Charter, Corporate Governance Committee Charter, Corporate Governance Guidelines and codes of conduct are available 
without charge through the "Corporate Governance" portion of the Investor Relations page of the Company's web site, as well. 

Copies will also be provided, free of charge, to any stockholder upon written request to Investor Relations at the address above

or by telephone at (866) 230-1633. 

The Company's Internet site and the information contained on it are not incorporated into this Form 10-K. 

9

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 

The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Other events that we do not currently anticipate or

that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Relating to Our Company 

The majority of our revenues are related to the dollar amount of fuel purchased by our customers, and, as a result, 
volatility in fuel prices could have an adverse effect on our payment processing revenues. 

In 2009, approximately 57 percent of our total revenues were attributable to fees paid to us by fuel and vehicle maintenance 

providers based on a negotiated percentage of the purchase price paid by our customers. Our customers primarily purchase fuel. 
Accordingly, our revenues are largely dependent on fuel prices, which are prone to significant volatility. For example, we estimate 
that during 2009, a 10 cent decline in average fuel prices below average actual prices would have resulted in approximately a 
$7.5 million decline in 2009 revenue. Declines in the price of fuel could have a material adverse effect on our total revenues.

Fuel prices are dependent on several factors, all of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others: 

(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)

supply and demand for oil and gas, and expectations regarding supply and demand; 
speculative trading; 
actions by major oil exporting nations; 
political conditions in other oil-producing and gas-producing countries, including insurgency, terrorism or war; 
refinery capacity; 
weather; 
the prices of foreign exports and the availability of alternate fuel sources; 
value of the U.S. dollar vs. other major currencies; 
general worldwide economic conditions; and 
governmental regulations and tariffs. 

Derivative transactions may not adequately stabilize our cash flows and may cause volatility in our earnings. 

Because the majority of our revenues are subject to fuel price volatility, we utilize fuel price sensitive derivative instruments to 

manage our exposure to this volatility by seeking to limit fluctuations in our cash flows. For a more detailed discussion of these
derivative instruments see our "Fuel Price Derivatives" discussion in Item 1. These instruments may expose us to the risk of financial 
loss if, for example, the counterparties fail to perform under the contracts governing those arrangements, we unwind our position 
before the expiration of the contract or there is a significant change in fuel prices. The success of our fuel price derivatives program 
depends upon, among other things, our ability to forecast the amount of fuel purchased by fleets using our services and the percent fee 
we will earn from merchants. To the extent our forecasts are inaccurate these derivative contracts may be inadequate to protect us 
against significant changes in fuel prices or over-expose us to fuel price volatility. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on these 
contracts will be recorded each quarter to reflect changes in the market value of the underlying contracts. As a result, our quarterly net 
income may be prone to significant volatility. 

In an increasing interest rate environment, interest expense on the variable rate portion of our borrowings on our credit 
facility would increase and we may not be able to replace our maturing certificates of deposit with new certificates of 
deposit that carry the same interest rates. 

We had $128 million of indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2009, under our credit agreement, of which $70 million 

bears interest at rates that vary with changes in overall market interest rates. Rising interest rates would result in reduced net income. 

The certificates of deposit that our industrial bank subsidiary uses to finance payments to major oil companies carry fixed rates

from issuance to maturity. Upon maturity, the certificates of deposit will be replaced by issuing new certificates of deposit to the 
extent that they are needed to finance payments primarily to oil companies. In a rising interest rate environment, FSC would not be 
able to replace maturing certificates of deposit with new certificates of deposit that carry the same interest rates. Rising interest rates 
would result in reduced net income to the extent that certificates of deposit mature and need to be replaced. At December 31, 2009, 
FSC had outstanding $308.3 million in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $106.7 million in certificates of deposit 
maturing within one to two years. 

10

Our exposure to counterparty credit risk could create an adverse affect on our financial condition. 

We engage in a number of transactions where counterparty credit risk becomes a relevant factor. Specifically, we have fuel 

price derivatives and interest rate swaps whose values at any point in time are dependent upon not only the market but also the
viability of the counterparty. The failure or perceived weakness of any of our counterparties has the potential to expose us to risk of 
loss in these situations. Financial institutions, primarily banks, have historically been our most significant counterparties. 

Our industry continues to become increasingly competitive, which makes it more difficult for us to maintain profit 
margins at historical levels. 

We face and may continue to face increased levels of competition in each category of the overall industry from several 
companies that seek to offer competing capabilities and services. Historically, we have been able to provide customers with a wide 
spectrum of services and capabilities and, therefore, we have not considered price to be the exclusive or even the primary basis on 
which we compete. As our competitors have continued to develop their service offerings, it has become increasingly more difficult for 
us to compete solely on the basis of superior capabilities or service. In some areas of our business we have been forced to respond to 
competitive pressures by reducing our fees. We have seen erosion of our historical profit margins as we use alternative pricing to 
encourage existing strategic relationships to sign long-term contracts. If these trends continue and if competition intensifies, our 
profitability may be adversely impacted. 

While we have traditionally offered our services to all categories of the fleet industry, some of our competitors have 

successfully garnered significant share in particular categories of the overall industry. To the extent that our competitors are regarded 
as leaders in specific categories, they may have an advantage over us as we attempt to further penetrate these categories. 

We also face increased competition in our efforts to enter into new strategic relationships and renew existing strategic 

relationships on the same terms. 

Our business and operating results are dependent on several key strategic relationships, the loss of which could adversely 
affect our results of operations. 

Revenue we received from services we provided to our top five strategic relationships accounted for approximately 19 percent 

of our total revenues in 2009. Accordingly, we are dependent on maintaining our strategic relationships and our results of operations
would be lower in the event that these relationships were terminated. 

Likewise, we have agreements with the major oil companies and fuel retailers whose locations accept our payment processing 

services. The termination of any of these agreements would reduce the number of locations where our payment processing services are 
accepted; therefore, we could lose our competitive advantage and our operating results could be adversely affected.

We are exposed to risks associated with operations outside of the United States, which could harm both our domestic and 
international operations.  

We conduct operations in Canada, Europe, New Zealand and Australia.  As part of our business strategy and growth plan, we 

plan to expand our international sales as we obtain relationships with organizations outside of the United States. Expansion of our 
international operations could impose substantial burdens on our resources, divert management’s attention from domestic operations 
and otherwise harm our business.  In addition, there are many barriers to competing successfully in the international market, including:  

(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)
(cid:2)

changes in the relations between the United States and foreign countries;  
actions of foreign or United States governmental authority affecting trade and foreign investment;  
regulations on repatriation of funds;  
increased infrastructure costs including complex legal, tax, accounting and information technology laws and treaties;  
interpretation and application of local laws and regulations;  
enforceability of intellectual property and contract rights;  
potentially adverse tax consequences; and  
local labor conditions and regulations.  

We cannot assure you that our investments outside the United States will produce desired levels of revenue or that one or more 

of the factors listed above will not harm our business. 

11

A decline in general economic conditions affects our revenue and adversely impacts our business.

Unfavorable changes in economic conditions, including declining consumer confidence, inflation, recession or other changes, 
may lead our customers, which are largely comprised of commercial fleets and corporate charge card and single use account users, to 
require less of our services as a result of declines in their businesses. These declines could result from, among other things, reduced 
fleet traffic, corporate purchasing, travel and other economic activities from which we derive revenue. These challenging economic 
conditions also may impair the ability of our customers or partners to pay for services they have purchased and, as a result, our reserve 
for credit losses and write-offs of accounts receivable could increase.  

Decreased demand for fuel and other vehicle products and services could harm our business and results of operations. 

Our results of operations are dependent on the number of transactions we process and the dollar value of those transactions. We

believe that our transaction volume is correlated with general economic conditions in the United States. A downturn in the United
States economy is generally characterized by reduced commercial activity and, consequently, reduced purchasing of fuel and other
vehicle products and services. 

In addition, demand for fuel and other vehicle products and services may be reduced by other factors that are beyond our 

control, such as the implementation of fuel efficiency standards and the development by vehicle manufacturers and adoption by our 
fleet customers of vehicles with greater fuel efficiency or alternative fuel sources.  

Our failure to effectively implement new technology could jeopardize our position as a leader in our industry. 

As a provider of information management and payment processing services, we must constantly adapt and respond to the 
technological advances offered by our competitors and the informational requirements of our customers, including those related to the 
Internet, in order to maintain and improve upon our competitive position. We may not be able to expand our technological capabilities 
and service offerings as rapidly as our competitors, which could jeopardize our position as a leader in our industry. 

We are dependent on technology systems and electronic communications networks managed by third parties, which could 
result in our inability to prevent service disruptions. 

Our ability to process and authorize transactions electronically depends on our ability to electronically communicate with our 
fuel and vehicle maintenance providers through point-of-sale devices and electronic networks that are owned and operated by third 
parties. The electronic communications networks upon which we depend are often subject to disruptions of various magnitudes and
durations. Any severe disruption of one or all of these networks could impair our ability to authorize transactions or collect 
information about such transactions, which, in turn, could harm our reputation for dependable service and adversely affect our results 
of operations. In addition, our ability to collect enhanced data relating to our customers' purchases may be limited by the use of older 
point-of-sale devices by fuel and vehicle maintenance providers. To the extent that fuel and vehicle maintenance providers within our 
network are slow to adopt advanced point-of-sale devices, we may not be able to offer the services and capabilities our customers
demand. 

If we fail to adequately assess and monitor credit risks of our customers, we could experience an increase in credit loss. 

We are subject to the credit risk of our customers, many of which are small to mid-sized businesses. We use various formulae 
and models to screen potential customers and establish appropriate credit limits, but these formulae and models cannot eliminate all 
potential bad credit risks and may not prevent us from approving applications that are fraudulently completed. Increases in average 
fuel prices can require us to periodically increase credit limits for a significant number of our customers. Moreover, businesses that are 
good credit risks at the time of application may become bad credit risks over time and we may fail to detect such change. In times of 
economic recession, the number of our customers who default on payments owed to us tends to increase. If we fail to adequately 
manage our credit risks, our bad debt expense could be significantly higher than it has been in the past. 

Volatility in the financial markets may negatively impact our ability to access credit.  

Adverse conditions in the credit market may limit our ability to access credit at a time when we would like to or need to do so.
Our revolving credit facility expires in May 2012, when the outstanding balance will be due.  Any limitation of availability of funds or 
credit  facilities  could  have  an  impact  on  our  ability  to  refinance  the  maturing  debt  or  react  to  changing  economic  and  business
conditions which could adversely impact us.  

12

The loss or suspension of the charter for our Utah industrial bank or changes in regulatory requirements could be 
disruptive to operations and increase costs. 

FSC's bank regulatory status enables FSC to issue certificates of deposit, accept money market deposits and borrow on a federal
funds rate basis. These funds are used to support our payment processing operations, which require the Company to make payments to 
fuel and maintenance providers on behalf of fleets. FSC operates under a uniform set of state lending laws, and its operations are 
subject to extensive state and federal regulation. FSC is regulated and examined by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions on 
the state level, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the federal level. Continued licensing and federal deposit insurance 
are subject to ongoing satisfaction of compliance and safety and soundness requirements. FSC must be well capitalized and satisfy a 
range of additional capital requirements. If FSC were to lose its bank charter, Wright Express would either outsource its credit support 
activities or perform these activities itself, which would subject the Company to the credit laws of each individual state in which 
Wright Express conducts business. Furthermore, Wright Express could not be a MasterCard issuer and would have to work with 
another financial institution to issue the product or sell the portfolio. Any such change would be disruptive to Wright Express'
operations and could result in significant incremental costs. In addition, changes in the bank regulatory environment, including the 
implementation of new or varying measures or interpretations by the state of Utah or the federal government, may significantly affect
or restrict the manner in which the Company conducts business in the future. 

We may not be able to adequately protect the data we collect about our customers, which could subject us to liability and 
damage our reputation. 

We collect and store data about our customers and their fleets, including bank account information and spending data. Our 

customers expect us to keep this information in our confidence. Attempts by experienced programmers or "hackers" to penetrate our 
network security could misappropriate our proprietary information or cause interruptions in our WEXOnline® web site. We may be 
required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat of such security breaches or to alleviate
problems caused by such breaches. Moreover, any security breach or inadvertent transmission of information about our customers 
could expose us to liability and/or litigation and cause damage to our reputation. 

We may incur substantial losses due to fraudulent use of our charge cards. 

Under certain circumstances, when we fund customer transactions, we bear the risk of substantial losses due to fraudulent use 

of our charge cards. We do not maintain any insurance to protect us against any such losses. 

If we fail to maintain effective systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, 
we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which could cause current and potential 
shareholders to lose confidence in our financial reporting, adversely affect the trading price of our securities or harm our 
operating results. 

Effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are necessary for us to provide 

reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. Our financial reporting and 
disclosure controls and procedures are reliant, in part, on information we receive from third parties that supply information to us 
regarding transactions that we process. Any failure to develop or maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and 
disclosure controls and procedures could harm our reputation or operating results, or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. 
If we are unable to adequately maintain our internal control over financial reporting, our external auditors will not be able to issue an 
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. 

Ineffective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures could cause investors to lose 
confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities or affect our 
ability to access the capital markets and could result in regulatory proceedings against us by, among others, the SEC. In addition, a 
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, which may lead to deficiencies in the preparation of financial 
statements, could lead to litigation claims against us. The defense of any such claims may cause the diversion of management's 
attention and resources, and we may be required to pay damages if any such claims or proceedings are not resolved in our favor. Any 
litigation, even if resolved in our favor, could cause us to incur significant legal and other expenses. Such events could harm our 
business, affect our ability to raise capital and adversely affect the trading price of our securities. 

13

Historical transactions with our former parent company may adversely affect our financial statements. 

Historical transactions involving Avis Budget Group, Inc. (“Avis”) (formerly Cendant Corporation), our former corporate 

parent, and our other former affiliates such as Realogy Corporation and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, may be reviewed from 
time to time by external parties that may include, but are not limited to, former subsidiaries or operating companies of Avis Budget 
Group, Inc., as well as government regulatory organizations. The decision by one or more of these organizations to undertake a review 
is beyond our control. While management does not believe, nor has any knowledge of, any transaction that would be in error or 
otherwise adjusted, corrections to the financial statements of Avis Budget Group, Inc., or its successor or its current or former
affiliates, could adversely affect our financial statements. 

Our ability to attract and retain qualified employees is critical to the success of our business and the failure to do so may 
materially adversely affect our performance. 

We believe our employees, including our executive management team, are our most important resource and, in our industry and 

geographic area, competition for qualified personnel is intense. If we were unable to retain and attract qualified employees, our 
performance could be materially adversely affected. 

If we engage in acquisitions, we will incur costs and may never realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions.

We have acquired and may attempt to acquire businesses, technologies, services, products or license in technologies that we 

believe are a strategic fit with our business. The process of integrating any acquired business, technology, service or product may 
result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and may divert significant management attention from our ongoing 
business operations. As a result, we will incur a variety of costs in connection with acquisitions and may never realize their anticipated 
benefits.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock 

If any entity controls 10 percent or more of our common stock and such entity has caused a violation of applicable 
banking laws by its failure to obtain any required approvals prior to acquiring that common stock, we have the power to 
restrict such entity's ability to vote shares held by it. 

As owners of a Utah industrial bank, we are subject to banking regulations that require any entity that controls 10 percent or 
more of our common stock to obtain the prior approval of Utah banking authorities and the federal banking regulators. A failure to 
comply with these requirements could result in sanctions, including the loss of our Utah industrial bank charter. Our certificate of 
incorporation requires that if any stockholder fails to provide us with satisfactory evidence that any required approvals have been 
obtained, we may, or will if required by state or federal regulators, restrict such stockholder's ability to vote such shares with respect to 
any matter subject to a vote of our stockholders. 

Provisions in our charter documents, Delaware law and applicable banking law may delay or prevent our acquisition by a 
third party. 

Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and our rights plan contain several provisions that may make it more difficult for a 
third party to acquire control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions include, among other things, a 
classified board of directors, the elimination of stockholder action by written consent, advance notice for raising business or making 
nominations at meetings of stockholders and "blank check" preferred stock. Blank check preferred stock enables our board of 
directors, without stockholder approval, to designate and issue additional series of preferred stock with such special dividend,
liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights, including the right to issue convertible securities with no limitations on conversion, and 
rights to dividends and proceeds in a liquidation that are senior to the common stock, as our board of directors may determine. These 
provisions may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting common stock. We 
also are subject to certain provisions of Delaware law, which could delay, deter or prevent us from entering into an acquisition,
including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in a business
combination with an interested stockholder unless specific conditions are met. These provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a 
merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a 
premium over the market price for their common stock. 

In addition, because we own a Utah industrial bank, any purchaser of our common stock who would own 10 percent or more of 

our common stock after such purchase would be required to obtain the prior consent of Utah banking authorities and the federal 
banking authorities prior to consummating any such acquisition. These regulatory requirements may preclude or delay the purchase of 
a relatively large ownership stake by certain potential investors. 

14

Our stockholder rights plan could prevent you from receiving a premium over the market price for your shares of 
common stock from a potential acquirer. 

Our board of directors approved a stockholder rights plan, which entitles our stockholders to acquire shares of our common 

stock at a price equal to 50 percent of the then current market value in limited circumstances when a third party acquires 15 percent or 
more of our outstanding common stock or announces its intent to commence a tender offer for at least 15 percent of our common 
stock, in each case, in a transaction that our board of directors does not approve. The existence of these rights would significantly
increase the cost of acquiring control of our Company without the support of our board of directors because, under these limited
circumstances, all of our stockholders, other than the person or group who caused the rights to become exercisable, would become
entitled to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount. The existence of the rights plan could therefore deter potential acquirers 
and thereby reduce the likelihood that our stockholders will receive a premium for their common stock in an acquisition. 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 

None. 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 

All of our facilities are leased, including our 67,000 square foot corporate headquarters in South Portland, Maine. We lease five 

smaller buildings in the South Portland area. Four of these buildings, totaling 86,000 square feet, are used for technical and customer 
service employees. The fifth building is 7,500 square feet and is our warehouse. We lease 11,500 square feet of office space in Salt 
Lake City, Utah to support our bank operations and a second call center location. We lease 4,000 square feet in Louisville, Kentucky 
to support TelaPoint. We lease 10,000 square feet of space in Salem, Oregon to support Pacific Pride, a wholly owned subsidiary of 
Wright Express. We lease 5,800 square feet of space in Auckland, New Zealand to support Wright Express International. These 
facilities are adequate for our current use. Additional financial information about our leased facilities appears in Item 8 – Note 18 of 
our consolidated financial statements. 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

As of the date of this filing, we are not involved in any material legal proceedings. We also were not involved in any material
legal proceedings that were terminated during the fourth quarter of 2009. From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and 
claims in the ordinary course of business, none of which we believe are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three months ended December 31, 2009. 

15

PART II 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER 

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 

Market Information 

The principal market for the Company's common stock is the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and our ticker symbol is 

WXS. The following table sets forth, for the indicated calendar periods, the reported intraday high and low sales prices of the common 
stock on the NYSE Composite Tape: 

2008
  First quarter 
  Second quarter 
  Third quarter 
  Fourth quarter 

2009
  First quarter 
  Second quarter 
  Third quarter 
  Fourth quarter 

High 

Low 

  $
  $
  $
  $

  $
  $
  $
  $

35.38  $
34.75  $
32.46  $
30.96  $

18.77  $
28.12  $
32.14  $
32.72  $

24.98 
24.78 
22.14 
8.21 

10.72 
17.51 
22.58 
27.39 

As of February 23, 2010, the closing price of our common stock was $29.99 per share, there were 38,213,657 shares of our 

common stock outstanding and there were 6 holders of record of our common stock. 

Dividends 

The Company has not declared any dividends on its common stock since it commenced trading on the NYSE on February 16, 
2005. The timing and amount of future dividends will be (i) dependent upon the Company's results of operations, financial condition, 
cash requirements and other relevant factors, (ii) subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company and (iii) payable 
only out of the Company's surplus or current net profits in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

The Company has certain restrictions on the dividends it may pay. If the Company's leverage ratio is higher than 1.75, the 

Company may pay no more than $10 million per annum for restricted payments, including dividends. 

Share Repurchases 

The following table provides information about the Company's purchases of shares of the Company's common stock during the 

quarter ended December 31, 2009: 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased 

Average Price 
Paid per Share 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased 
as Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans or 

Programs

(a)

Approximate Dollar 
Value of Shares 
that May Yet Be 
Purchased Under 
the Plans or 
(a)
Programs

October 1 – October 31, 2009 
November 1 – November 30, 2009 
December 1 – December 31, 2009 

  Total 

—   $
—   $
—   $

—   $

—
—
—

—

66,990,242  
66,990,242  
66,990,242  

—   $
—   $
—   $

—

(a) On February 7, 2007, the Company announced a share repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $75 million of its common stock over 
the next 24 months. In July 2008, our board of directors approved an increase of $75 million to the share repurchase authorization. In addition, our 
board of directors extended the share repurchase program to July 25, 2010. We have been authorized to purchase, in total, up to $150 million of our 
common stock. Share repurchases will be made on the open market and may be commenced or suspended at any time. The Company's 
management, based on its evaluation of market and economic conditions and other factors, will determine the timing and number of shares 
repurchased.

16

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

The following table sets forth our summary historical financial information for the periods ended and as of the dates indicated.

You should read the following historical financial information along with Item 7 contained in this Form 10-K and the consolidated 
financial statements and related notes thereto. The financial information included in the table below is derived from audited financial 
statements: 

(in thousands, except per share data) 

Income statement information 
Total revenues 
Total operating expenses 
Financing interest expense 
Net realized and unrealized (losses) gains on fuel price derivatives 
Net income 
Basic earnings per share
Weighted average basic shares 
  of common stock outstanding 

Balance sheet information, at end of period 
Total assets 
Liabilities and stockholders' equity 
  All liabilities except preferred stock 
  Preferred stock 
  Total stockholders' equity 

2009

Year ended December 31, 
2007 

2008 

2006 

2005(a)

$
$
$
$
$
$

318,224   $
200,074   $
6,210   $
(22,542 )  $
139,659   $
3.65   $

393,582  $
232,150  $
11,859  $
55,206  $
127,640  $
3.28  $

336,128  $
184,036  $
12,677  $
(53,610)  $
$
51,577
1.29  $

291,247  $
156,144  $
14,447  $
(4,180)  $
74,609  $
1.85  $

241,333 
134,716 
12,966 
(65,778) 
18,653 
0.46 

38,303  

38,885 

40,042 

40,373 

40,194 

$ 1,499,662   $ 1,611,855  $ 1,785,076  $ 1,551,015  $ 1,448,295 

$ 1,048,346   $ 1,307,193  $ 1,570,817  $ 1,357,888  $ 1,335,682 
10,000 
102,613 

10,000  
441,316  

10,000 
183,127 

10,000 
204,259 

10,000 
294,662 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 

$ 1,499,662   $ 1,611,855  $ 1,785,076  $ 1,551,015  $ 1,448,295 

(a) 2005 includes several costs related to the IPO and the first year of being a publicly traded, stand-alone entity, which may impact the comparability to 

subsequent year's results. 

17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF 

OPERATIONS 

2009 Highlights and Year in Review 

During 2009, we focused on growing our customer base, customer retention and cost containment. As a result of our efforts, we 

increased the size of our fleet portfolio and grew our MasterCard segment to a purchase volume of over $3 billion for the year. Our 
credit losses were significantly reduced as we refined our credit and collection procedures. Our results for the year were impacted by 
the following significant events and accomplishments: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

The United States economy was in a recession during most of 2009 and faced many challenges that directly impacted 
our business. During 2009 we experienced a reduction in our fleet segment volume as compared to previous years.  

Our MasterCard segment grew to $3.1 billion in purchase volume for the year. This increase is primarily due to our 
single use account product used for online travel. 

We entered into the Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement with Realogy Corporation ("Realogy") in June 2009. We 
paid Realogy $51 million, less our bank fees and legal expenses, as a prepayment in full to settle the remaining 
obligations to Realogy under the 2005 Tax Receivable Agreement. These obligations were recorded on our balance 
sheet at approximately $187 million and this transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $136 million. We remain 
obligated to pay the portion of the obligation under our tax receivable agreement that was assigned to Wyndham 
Worldwide Corporation ("Wyndham"). 

During the fourth quarter of 2008, we began processing transactions for fleets in the Federal Government's General 
Services Administration ("GSA"). As a result we added 278,000 federal fleet vehicles using our fuel purchase, vehicle 
maintenance and accident management services. During 2009 we processed 7.8 million transactions in connection 
with the GSA contract.  

Credit losses, when we combine both the Fleet and MasterCard segments, were approximately $27 million lower than 
2008, for a total of $17.7 million. Credit losses for 2009 were within our historical range.  

Fuel prices averaged $2.39 per gallon during 2009. Fuel prices averaged $3.47 per gallon during 2008. As of 
December 31, 2009, the price of fuel increased, resulting in an unrealized loss of $43 million for the year. 

18

Outlook for the Future 

Looking forward, we anticipate the following: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

We expect a stable economic environment during 2010; therefore we expect transaction volume within our installed 
customer base will be slightly negative to slightly positive compared to 2009.  

Our provision for credit losses is one of the most volatile expenses in our business. While we have over $800 million 
in accounts receivable at December 31, 2009, the credit we extend is not revolving which limits our exposure to credit 
losses as compared to businesses which have consumer exposure or revolving credit arrangements. Nearly all of our 
receivables are due in full within 30 days or less. We tightly manage credit lines and monitor customer payments. We 
are estimating credit losses in our fleet segment to be in the range of 18 to 23 basis points of payment processing 
transaction expenditures for 2010. 

We will continue to invest in our fuel card processing software solutions that will give us a presence in select 
geographic markets around the world. We seek to develop long term relationships with large oil companies currently 
operating in the international arena, in order to increase the overall portfolio value through an outsourced processing 
and information management solution. 

19

Results of Operations 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009, AS COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our Fleet segment: 

FLEET SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Service Revenues 
  Payment processing revenue 
  Transaction processing revenue 
  Account servicing revenue 
  Finance fees 
  Other 

  Total service revenues 

Product Revenues 
  Hardware and equipment sales 

  Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 

Financing interest expense 
Loss on foreign currency transactions 
Gain on settlement portion of amounts due under tax receivable  
  derivatives agreement 
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fuel price 
  derivative instruments  
(Increase) decrease in amount due under tax receivable agreement 

Income before taxes 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands, except per transaction and per gallon data) 

Key operating statistics 
  Payment processing revenue: 

  Payment processing transactions 
  Average expenditure per payment processing transaction 
  Average price per gallon of fuel 

  Transaction processing revenue: 

  Transaction processing transactions 

  Account servicing revenue: 

  Average number of vehicles serviced 

2009

2008 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $

182,530  $

17,532
36,943
32,321
8,447

272,501 
19,339 
30,573 
30,716 
9,902 

277,773

363,031 

3,244

3,579 

281,017

366,610 

176,438

211,550 

104,579

155,060 

(33)% 
(9)% 
21 % 
5 % 
(15)% 

(23)% 

(9)% 

(23)% 

(17)% 

(33)% 

(48)% 
— 

(6,210)
(40)

136,485

(22,542)
(599)

211,673
80,436

  $

131,237  $

(11,859) 
— 

— 

— 

55,206 
(9,014) 

(141)% 
(93)% 

189,393 
65,908 
123,485 

12 % 
22 % 
6 % 

2009

2008 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $
  $

204,147

48.71  $
2.39  $

216,193 
69.80 
3.47 

(6)% 
(30)% 
(31)% 

55,921

60,831 

(8)% 

4,648

4,492 

3 % 

Payment processing revenue decreased $90.0 million for 2009, as compared to 2008. This decrease is primarily due to a 
31 percent decrease in the average price per gallon of fuel as well as a 6 percent decrease in the number of payment processing
transactions. A majority of our contracts contain both a fixed fee and a percentage fee component. The remainder of our contracts
have just a percentage fee component. This combined fixed fee and percentage fee structure reduces the impact of fuel price volatility 
on our payment processing revenues. Payment processing transactions were down as a result in the economic recession during the 
year.

Transaction processing revenue decreased $1.8 million for 2009, as compared to 2008. This decrease in revenue is due 

primarily to one customer changing from transaction processing to payment processing.

20

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Account servicing revenue increased $6.4 million for 2009, as compared to 2008. This increase is due both to our expansion 
into international markets following our August 2008 acquisition of Financial Automation Limited and our WEXSmartTM telematics 
program. 

Our finance fees have increased $1.6 million for 2009, as compared to 2008. During December of 2008, we adjusted our late 

fee charged to delinquent customers to encourage timely payments. While delinquencies declined, our adjustment to late fees still
caused finance fees to increase, contributing approximately $12 million during 2009. This increase in revenue was largely offset by a 
decline in delinquent balances due to an improvement in aging and lower receivable balances, as compared to the same period in the 
prior year.  

The following table compares selected expense line items within our Fleet segment: 

(in thousands) 

Expense
  Salary and other personnel 
  Service fees 
  Provision for credit loss 
  Depreciation and amortization 
  Operating interest expense 

2009

2008 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $
  $
  $
  $
  $

72,256  $
12,895  $
15,854  $
21,721  $
11,723  $

63,899 
10,669 
42,971 
19,483 
32,148 

13 % 
21 % 
(63)% 
11 % 
(64)% 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Salary and other personnel expenses increased $8.4 million over last year. This increase is primarily due to higher 
stock-based compensation and short-term incentive program bonuses for 2009 over 2008, as we did not pay bonuses 
under our short-term incentive program in the prior year, as program targets were not achieved. 

Service fees increased $2.2 million for 2009. This increase is primarily due to professional service fees for legal and 
accounting work related to costs associated with our international activities and our WEXSmartTM telematics program. 

We generally measure our credit loss performance by calculating credit losses as a percentage of total fuel 
expenditures on payment processing transactions ("Fuel Expenditures"). This metric for credit losses was 
15.9 basis points of Fuel Expenditures for 2009, compared to 28.5 basis points of Fuel Expenditures for 2008. We use 
a roll rate methodology to calculate the amount necessary for our ending receivable reserve balance. This methodology 
takes into account total receivable balances, recent charge off experience, recoveries on previously charged off 
accounts and the dollars that are delinquent to calculate the total reserve. In addition, management undertakes a 
detailed evaluation of the receivable balances to help ensure further overall reserve adequacy. The expense we 
recognized in the period is the amount necessary to bring the reserve to its required level after charge offs.  Provision 
for credit loss decreased $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008.  
Approximately $11 million of this decrease is associated with lower fuel expenditures, primarily as a result of 
decreases in the price of fuel.  Improvements in receivables aging and ultimate charge offs as well as strong recoveries 
on previously charged off accounts accounted for the remainder of the change. 

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $2.2 million. This increase is primarily due to higher depreciation 
expense as a result of additional expenditures for internally-developed software. We continue to carefully monitor the 
recoverability of software asset values. 

Operating interest expense relates to our deposits and borrowed federal funds. This interest expense decreased 
$20.4 million during 2009, compared to 2008. We finance the receivables arising from our payment processing 
transactions with our operating debt (deposits and borrowed federal funds). Our average debt balance for 2009 totaled 
$434.5 million as compared to our average debt balance of $664.6 million for 2008. This resulted in approximately a 
$10 million decrease in operating interest. Our operating interest expense is also lower due to a decrease in weighted 
average interest rates to 2.2 percent in 2009 from 4.3 percent in 2008. The decrease in interest rates reduced operating 
interest expense year over year by approximately $9 million.  

21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During 2009, we incurred $0.8 million in impairment charges related to partially completed internal-use software. During 2008, 

we incurred a $1.5 million impairment charge related to partially completed internal-use software. These non-cash charges for both 
years have been included in occupancy and equipment expense. 

Financing interest expense is related primarily to our revolving credit facility and secondarily, to our preferred stock that we

issued as part of our initial public offering. Interest expense for 2009 decreased $5.6 million from 2008, due to lower interest rates and 
a reduction in the outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility. 

We own fuel price sensitive derivative instruments that we purchase on a periodic basis to manage the impact of volatility in 
fuel prices on our cash flows. Our derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Accordingly, realized and unrealized
gains and losses on our fuel price sensitive derivative instruments affect our net income. We recognized an unrealized loss of 
$43.1 million in 2009 compared to unrealized gain of $90.9 million in 2008. We recognized a realized gain of $20.6 million in 2009 
and a realized loss of $35.7 million in 2008. 

Our effective tax rate was 38.0 percent for 2009 and 34.8 percent for 2008. Our effective tax rate may fluctuate due to changes

in the mix of earnings among legal entities. Our tax rate also fluctuates due to the impacts that rate mix changes have on our net 
deferred tax assets. Adjustments to net deferred tax assets for rate changes can cause volatility in our effective tax rates. The 2009 
provision for income taxes reflects losses incurred in foreign jurisdictions where no benefits are recognized. The 2008 provision for 
income taxes reflects a net benefit of approximately $8.9 million as a result of rate change impacts on the deferred tax asset balance. 
These rate changes also increased the associated liability to Avis, resulting in a $9.0 million charge to non-operating expense in 2008. 
Changes in the price of fuel which impacts our fuel price derivatives and changes in the mix of earnings between our legal entities,
especially between U.S. and international subsidiaries, may cause fluctuations in our effective tax rates. 

22

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our MasterCard segment: 

MASTERCARD SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Service Revenues 
  Payment processing revenue 
  Account servicing revenue 
  Finance fees 
  Other 

  Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands) 

Key operating statistics 
  Payment processing revenue: 

  MasterCard purchase volume 

2009

2008 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $

33,090  $
58
495
3,564

37,207

23,636

13,571
5,149
8,422  $

  $

24,940 
58 
327 
1,647 

26,972 

20,600 

6,372 
2,217 
4,155 

33 % 
— 
51% 
116 % 

38 % 

15 % 

113 % 
132 % 
103 % 

2009

2008 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $ 3,082,779  $ 2,404,646 

28 % 

Payment processing revenue increased approximately $8.2 million over 2008, primarily due to additional business derived from 

our single use account product. Our MasterCard purchase volume grew by over $678 million in 2009 compared to 2008. 

Other revenue increased during 2009 as the volume of cross-border fees increased over the prior year. These fees are primarily 
associated with our single use account product being used for online travel. This increase is offset by an increase in associated service 
fees expense. 

Operating expenses increased by $3.0 million during 2009 primarily due to the following: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Service fees increased by $5.1 million as compared to 2008 due to higher purchase volumes. 

Operating interest decreased $1.3 million primarily due to lower interest rates. 

Credit loss reserve expense decreased $0.2 million. We measure our credit loss performance by calculating credit 
losses as a percentage of total card purchases. This metric for credit losses was 6.0 basis points of total MasterCard 
purchase volume for 2009 compared to 8.5 basis points for 2008. 

23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, AS COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our Fleet segment: 

FLEET SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Service Revenues 
  Payment processing revenue 
  Transaction processing revenue 
  Account servicing revenue 
  Finance fees 
  Other 

  Total service revenues 

Product Revenues 
  Hardware and equipment sales 

  Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 

Financing interest expense 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fuel price derivatives 
(Increase) decrease in amount due under tax receivable agreement 

Income before taxes 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands, except per transaction and per gallon data) 

Key operating statistics 
  Payment processing revenue: 

  Payment processing transactions 
  Average expenditure per payment processing transaction 
  Average price per gallon of fuel 

  Transaction processing revenue: 

  Transaction processing transactions 

  Account servicing revenue: 

  Average number of vehicles serviced 

2008

2007 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $

272,501  $

19,339
30,573
30,716
9,902

236,629 
14,452 
26,697 
26,509 
9,053 

363,031

313,340 

15 % 
34 % 
15 % 
16 % 
9 % 

16 % 

3,579

278 

1187 % 

366,610

313,618 

211,550

167,229 

155,060

146,389 

(11,859)
—
55,206
(9,014)

189,393
65,908

  $

123,485  $

(12,677) 
(1,572) 
(53,610) 
78,904 

157,434 
109,510 
47,924 

17 % 

27 % 

6 % 

(6)% 
(100)% 
(203)% 
(111)% 

20 % 
(40)% 
158 % 

2008

2007 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $
  $

216,193

69.80  $
3.47  $

210,714 
57.94 
2.84 

3 % 
20 % 
22 % 

60,831

38,804 

57 % 

4,492

4,390 

2 % 

Payment processing revenue increased $35.9 million for 2008, as compared to 2007. This increase is primarily due to a 
22 percent increase in the average price per gallon of fuel as well as a 3 percent increase in the number of payment processing
transactions. Unprecedented changes in the price of fuel during the course of the year, specifically during the second and third quarters 
when average fuel prices were as high as more than four dollars per gallon, drove most of the increased payment processing revenue. 
These historically high fuel prices influenced the behavior of both our customers and our merchants. In some instances as 2008 
progressed, we renegotiated agreements which offered higher rebates to certain customers. In other instances we renegotiated 
agreements with our merchants to change our pricing with them to include both a fixed fee component and a percentage fee 
component. The new pricing reduces the impact fuel price volatility has on our payment processing revenues. 

During 2008, our transaction processing transactions increased by $22.0 million over the prior year. The increase in revenue, as
well as the increase in transaction processing transactions, is due primarily to the acquisition of Pacific Pride during the first quarter of 
2008. 

The increase in account servicing revenue was primarily due to a full year of revenue from our TelaPoint subsidiary compared 

to five months in 2007 and a full year from our WEXSmartTM telematics program compared to seven months in 2007. 

Finance fees increased $4.2 million for 2008. The increase in finance fees was primarily due to higher average daily account 

receivable balances subject to late fees. These higher balances can primarily be attributed to elevated fuel prices. Offsetting the impact 
of higher average account receivable balances subject to late fees were changes in our portfolio. We found that customers who were

24

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consistently late with their payments, and made up a core of our finance fee base, stopped paying altogether. We terminated our
relationship with these customers and charged them off as a credit loss. As this customer base declined, our provision for credit loss 
increased and our finance fees decreased. 

As a result of our Pacific Pride acquisition in the first quarter of 2008 and the growth of our WEXSmartTM telematics program, 

we have revenues from the sale of hardware and equipment. These sales have been reflected separately in the operating results. 

The following table compares selected expense line items within our Fleet segment: 

(in thousands) 

Expense
  Salary and other personnel 
  Service fees 
  Provision for credit loss 
  Depreciation and amortization 
  Operating interest expense 

2008

2007 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $
  $
  $
  $
  $

63,899  $
10,669  $
42,971  $
19,483  $
32,148  $

62,145 
6,807 
19,770 
14,299 
31,490 

3 % 
57 % 
117 % 
36 % 
2% 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Salary and other personnel expenses increased $1.8 million over last year. These expenses were approximately 
$3.6 million higher due to a full year of expense from our TelaPoint subsidiary compared to five months in 2007 and 
the addition of Pacific Pride and Wright Express International during 2008. Offsetting this increase was a reduction in 
our cash bonus of $2.5 million. 

(cid:2)

Service fees increased $3.9 million for 2008. Professional service fees for legal and accounting work were 
approximately $3.0 million higher year over year as we incurred costs associated with a potential acquisition that did 
not materialize, investigated additional market opportunities and filed franchise disclosure documents on behalf of our 
Pacific Pride subsidiary. 

Provision for credit losses increased $23.2 million over last year. We measure our credit loss performance by 
calculating credit losses as a percentage of total expenditures on payment processing transactions ("Total 
Expenditures"). This metric for credit losses was 28.5 basis points of Total Expenditures for 2008 compared to 
16.3 basis points of Total Expenditures for 2007. This increase was predominantly due to higher charge-offs as a result 
of the weakening United States economy. This translated to additional credit loss expense of approximately 
$16 million. The remaining change in our credit loss expense year over year is primarily related to higher accounts 
receivable balances associated with higher fuel prices. 

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $5.2 million. The amortization associated with the intangible assets 
acquired with the August 2007 purchase of TelaPoint, the February 2008 purchase of Pacific Pride and the August 
2008 purchase of Financial Automation Limited resulted in an increase of $3.8 million. The remaining increase is 
primarily due to higher depreciation expense as a result of additional expenditures for internally-developed software. 

Operating interest increased $0.7 million compared to 2007. The average balance of our receivables, and therefore, our 
operating debt, was higher than prior year due to the exceptionally high fuel prices during 2008. Our average debt 
balance for 2008 totaled $664.6 million as compared to our average debt balance of $544.7 million for 2007. This 
resulted in approximately $6.4 million of additional operating interest. This increase in our operating interest expense 
due to higher average debt balances was more than offset by a decrease in weighted average interest rates to 
4.3 percent in 2008 from 5.3 percent in 2007. The decrease in interest rates reduced operating interest expense year 
over year by approximately $6.7 million.  

In the fourth quarter of 2008, we incurred a $1.5 million impairment charge related to partially completed internal-use software.

This non-cash charge was related to product development for the construction vertical. The impairment charge has been included in 
occupancy and equipment expense. 

Financing interest expense decreased $0.6 million from 2007, primarily due to lower interest rates. 

On our fuel price derivative instruments, we recognized unrealized gains of $90.9 million in 2008 compared to unrealized 

losses of $37.1 million in 2007. We recognized realized losses of $35.7 million in 2008 and $16.5 million in 2007. 

Our effective tax rate was 34.8 percent for 2008 and 69.6 percent for 2007. The 2008 provision for income taxes reflects a net 

benefit of approximately $8.9 million as a result of rate change impacts on the deferred tax asset balance. These rate changes also
increased the associated liability to Avis, resulting in a $9.0 million charge to non-operating expense in the current year. 

25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The unusual 2007 rate was attributable to the State of Maine's enactment of a law which changed the State's rules for 
apportioning income related to the performance of services. The new law effectively reduced taxable income or loss allocable to the 
State of Maine which lowered our blended state income tax rate which then decreased our deferred tax assets. This resulted in a charge 
to the provision for income taxes in the second quarter of 2007 of approximately $80.9 million. The lower projected overall tax rate in 
2007, in turn, decreased the expected benefit we will realize from the increased tax basis generated by our separation from Avis.
Accordingly, the related contractual liability to Avis recorded in connection with the tax receivable agreement decreased by 
approximately $78.9 million during the second quarter of 2007. 

26

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our MasterCard segment: 

MASTERCARD SEGMENT 

(in thousands) 

Revenues 
  Payment processing revenue 
  Account servicing revenue 
  Finance fees 
  Other 

  Total revenues 

Total operating expenses 

Operating income 
Income taxes 
Net income 

(in thousands) 

Key operating statistics 
  Payment processing revenue: 

  MasterCard purchase volume 

2008

2007 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $

  $

24,940  $
58
327
1,647

26,972

20,600

6,372
2,217
4,155  $

20,864 
70 
376 
1,200 

22,510 

16,807 

5,703 
2,050 
3,653 

20 % 
(17)% 
(13)% 
37 % 

20 % 

23 % 

12 % 
8 % 
14 % 

2008

2007 

Increase 
(decrease) 

  $ 2,404,646  $ 1,844,506 

30 % 

Payment processing revenue increased approximately $4.1 million over 2007, primarily due to additional business driven by 

new customers on our single use account service. Our MasterCard purchase volume grew by over $560 million in 2008 compared 
to 2007. 

Operating expenses increased by $3.8 million during 2008 primarily due to the following: 

(cid:2)

Service fees increased by $1.5 million as compared to 2007 due to higher purchase volumes. 

(cid:2) An increase in the credit loss reserve of $1.3 million. We measure our credit loss performance by calculating credit losses as 
a percentage of total card purchases. This metric for credit losses was 8.5 basis points of total MasterCard purchase volume 
for 2008 compared to 4.0 basis points for 2007. 

27

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Cash Flows 

We focus on management operating cash as a key element in 
achieving maximum stockholder value, and it is the primary measure we 
use internally to monitor cash flow performance from our core operations. 
Since deposits and borrowed federal funds are used to finance our accounts 
receivable, we believe that they are a recurring and necessary use and 
source of cash. As such, we consider deposits and borrowed federal funds 
when evaluating our operating activities. For the same reason, we believe 
that management operating cash may also be useful to investors as one 
means of evaluating our performance. However, management operating 
cash is a non-GAAP measure and should not be considered a substitute for, 
or superior to, net cash provided by (used for) operating activities as 
presented on the consolidated statement of cash flows in accordance with 
GAAP. 

2009 Cash Utilization Summary

Other, Net
$5.0

Capital 
expenditures
$17.9 

Financing
debt, net, 
$42.6 

During  2009,  we  used  approximately  $78.3 million  in  management 
operating  cash  as  compared  to  generating  approximately  $272.1 million  in 
2008  and  $53.2  million  in  2007.  The  significant  change  in  2009  is 
attributable  to  activity  at  our  bank  subsidiary,  FSC,  which  utilizes 
certificates  of  deposit  to  finance  our  accounts  receivable.  At  the  end  of 
2008,  FSC  was  overfunded  by  approximately  $140  million.  This 
overfunding  was  the  result  of  lower  receivable  balances  brought  about  by 
the rapid decline in fuel prices during the second half of 2008. During the 
first quarter of 2009 this overfunding was eliminated. Hence, there was a significant decrease in outstanding certificates of deposit as 
2008  amounts  matured.  Additionally,  during  the  second  quarter  of  2009,  we  prepaid  a  portion  of  our  liabilities  under  our  tax 
receivable agreement for $51 million, which resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $136 million. We anticipate, as we enter 2010, 
that we will return to reporting favorable management operating cash movements. 

Source of Cash

Use of Cash

(in millions)

Management
operating
cash, $78.3

The significant increase in management operating cash in 2008, as compared to 2007, is largely due to an approximately $670 million 
drop  in  our  accounts  receivable  balances  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2008  (see  above).  Our  excess  cash  position  at  the  end  of  2008
diminished in the first half of 2009 as certificates of deposit matured during the first quarter of 2009.  

2009 Highlights 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

During 2009, we reduced the outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility by $43 million.  

We used $6.3 million during 2009 to acquire our own common stock. 

We paid Realogy $51 million, less our bank fees and legal expenses, as a prepayment in full to settle the remaining 
obligations to Realogy under the 2005 Tax Receivable Agreement. These obligations were recorded on our balance 
sheet at approximately $187 million and this transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $136 million. We remain 
obligated to pay Wyndham the remainder of the obligation under our tax receivable agreement. 

During 2009, we had approximately $18 million of capital expenditures. A significant portion of our capital 
expenditures are for the development of internal-use computer software, primarily to enhance product features and 
functionality. We expect total capital expenditures for 2010 to be approximately $20 to $25 million. Our capital 
spending is financed primarily through internally generated funds. 

28

2008 Highlights 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

We used approximately $41 million from our credit facility 
for the acquisition of Pacific Pride and Financial 
Automation Limited. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we 
used excess cash to pay down approximately $30 million on 
our credit facility to a balance of $170.6 million at the end 
of the year.

We used $39 million during 2008 to acquire our own 
common stock. 

We had approximately $16 million of capital expenditures. 
A significant portion of our capital expenditures are for the 
development of internal-use computer software, primarily to 
enhance product features and functionality.  

2007 Highlights 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

We entered into a new credit agreement and repaid the term 
loan that we entered into at the time of our IPO. The net 
cash provided from our financing debt was $47 million. We 
borrowed approximately $40 million for the acquisition of 
TelaPoint during the third quarter of 2007. 

We used approximately $38 million as part of the new share 
repurchase program during 2007. 

We had approximately $20 million of capital expenditures, 
$17 million of which was cash. The 2007 capital 
expenditures included a financing agreement for 
approximately $3 million for a software license which we 
capitalized.

Management Operating Cash 

The table below reconciles net cash provided by (used for) operating 

activities to management operating cash: 

(in thousands) 

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 
Purchases of fleet card receivables 
Net (decrease) increase in deposits 
Net (decrease) increase in borrowed federal funds 

Management operating cash 

2008 Cash Utilization Summary

Manage m ent 
ope rating 
cash
$272.1 

Source of Cash

Use of Cash

(in m illions)

Other, net , 
$4.9 

Capital 
expenditu res
$16.1 

Share 
repurchas es
$39.0 

Acquisitio n
$41.6 

Financing  
debt, net, 
$30.4 

2007 Cash Utilization Summary

Other, net
$2.9 

Financing 
debt, net
$47.0 

Management 
operating 
cash
$53.2 

Capital 
expenditures
$16.6 

Share 
repurchases
$37.7 

Acquisition
$40.8 

Source of Cash

Use of Cash

(in m illions)

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

(33,167 )  $
—

(116,859 ) 
71,723

339,179  $

— 
(58,943)
(8,175)

(92,089)
(1,922)
204,390 
(57,221)

$

(78,303 )  $

272,061  $

53,158 

Management operating cash is not a measure in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). In order 
to reconcile from management operating cash to the classifications of cash flow activities presented on our consolidated statement of 
cash flows, we have adjusted our cash flows from investing activities for purchases of fleet card receivables, and our cash flows from 
financing activities for the changes in deposits and borrowed federal funds. 

Our bank subsidiary, FSC, utilizes certificates of deposit to finance our accounts receivable. FSC issued certificates of deposit

in various maturities ranging between three months and two years and with fixed interest rates ranging from 0.35 percent to 
4.00 percent as of December 31, 2009, as compared to fixed interest rates ranging from 2.85 percent to 5.45 percent as of 
December 31, 2008 and 4.50 percent to 5.45 percent as of December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately 

29

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$415.0 million of certificates of deposit outstanding at a weighted average rate of 1.25 percent, compared to $532.0 million of
certificates of deposit at a weighted average rate of 3.85 percent as of December 31, 2008, and approximately $599.0 million of
certificates of deposit outstanding at a weighted average rate of 5.16 percent as of December 31, 2007. 

FSC may issue certificates of deposit without limitation on the balance outstanding. However, FSC must maintain minimum 

financial ratios, which include risk-based asset and capital requirements, as prescribed by the FDIC. As of December 31, 2009, 
certificates of deposit were in denominations of $250,000 or less, corresponding to the increase in the FDIC insurance limits to
$250,000 as authorized by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The certificates of deposit are only payable prior to
maturity in the case of death or legally declared mental incompetence. We believe that our certificates of deposit are paying 
competitive yields and that there continues to be consumer demand for these instruments. 

Non-interest bearing deposits are required for certain customers as collateral for their credit accounts. We had $8.3 million of

these deposits on hand at December 31, 2009, $8.1 million at December 31, 2008, and $5.3 million at December 31, 2007. 

FSC also borrows from lines of credit on a federal funds rate basis to supplement the financing of our accounts receivable. Our

outstanding federal funds lines of credit were $155 million during 2009 and 2008 and $160 million during 2007. We have 
approximately $71.7 million in lines of credit on a federal funds rate basis as of December 31, 2009. 

Liquidity 

Our short-term cash requirements consist primarily of payments to major oil companies for purchases made by our fleet 

customers, payments on maturing certificates of deposit, interest payments on our credit facility, cash payments for derivative
instruments and other operating expenses. FSC is responsible for substantially all payments to major oil companies and payments on 
maturing certificates of deposit. FSC can fund our short-term cash requirements through the issuance of certificates of deposit and 
borrowed federal funds. Any remaining cash needs are primarily funded through operations. Under FDIC regulations, FSC may not 
pay any dividend if, following the payment of the dividend, FSC would be "undercapitalized," as defined under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act and applicable regulations.  

Our credit facility provides a $450 million revolving line-of-credit. Borrowings on the revolving line-of-credit bear interest 
equal to (a) the British Bankers Association LIBOR plus a margin of 0.45 percent to 1.125 percent based on our consolidated leverage 
ratio or (b) the higher of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50 percent or the prime rate announced by Bank of America, N.A., plus a
margin of up to 0.125 percent based on our consolidated leverage ratio. The revolving line-of-credit facility expires in May 2012, 
when the outstanding balance will be due. Our revolving credit facility had an available balance of approximately $320 million at
December 31, 2009.  

Our credit agreement contains various financial covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios. Specifically, our 

credit agreement limits us to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00 at the end of each fiscal quarter until the maturity 
date. The credit agreement also requires us to maintain a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00 at the end of 
each fiscal quarter until the maturity date. 

In addition to the financial covenants, the credit agreement contains various customary restrictive covenants that limit our 
ability to pay dividends, sell or transfer all or substantially all of our property or assets, incur more indebtedness or make guarantees, 
grant or incur liens on our assets, make investments, loans, advances or acquisitions, engage in mergers, consolidations, liquidations or 
dissolutions, enter into sales or leasebacks and change our accounting policies or reporting practices. FSC is not subject to certain of 
these restrictions. We were in compliance with all material covenants and restrictions at December 31, 2009, and expect to continue 
to be. 

Our fuel price derivatives are currently in a gain position due to the decline in oil prices during the fourth quarter of 2008. Even 

with the increases during 2009, the current fuel price is still below the floor prices set in the previous year. As a result, we have an 
asset related to these derivatives of approximately $6.2 million.  

We have entered into an interest rate swap arrangement that effectively converts $50 million of variable rate borrowing to fixed

rate borrowing at a rate of approximately 1.35 percent. This arrangement will expire in July of 2011. 

Our long-term cash requirements consist primarily of amounts due to Wyndham as part of our tax receivable agreement. As a 

consequence of our separation from Avis, we increased the tax bases of our tangible and intangible assets to their fair market value 
(the "Tax Basis Increase"). This Tax Basis Increase allows us to reduce the amount of future tax payments to the extent that we
generate sufficient taxable income. We were contractually obligated, pursuant to our tax receivable agreement with Avis, to remit to 
Avis 85 percent of any such cash savings, subject to repayment if it is determined that these savings should not have been available to 
us. We expect to fund these payments with the cash savings realized as a result of the Tax Basis Increase. Therefore, our current and 
expected operating cash flows attributable to the Tax Basis Increase are not expected to have a significant impact on us. 

30

Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of July 27, 2006, by and among Avis, Realogy, Wyndham and 

Travelport Inc., Realogy acquired from Cendant the right to receive 62.5 percent of the payments by us to Cendant and Wyndham 
acquired from Cendant the right to receive 37.5 percent of the payments by us to Cendant under the 2005 Tax Receivable Agreement.

On June 26, 2009, we entered into a Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement with Realogy, pursuant to which we paid Realogy 
$51 million, less our bank fees and legal expenses, as prepayment in full to settle the remaining obligations to Realogy under the 2005 
Tax Receivable Agreement. These obligations were previously valued at $187.5 million and this transaction resulted in a gain of
$136.5 million. In connection with the Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement with Realogy, we entered into a Ratification 
Agreement on June 26, 2009, (the "Ratification Agreement") with Avis, Realogy and Wyndham which amended the 2005 Tax 
Receivable Agreement to require the Company to pay 31.875 percent of the future tax savings related to the Tax Basis Increase to
Wyndham. 

As a result of the Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement, we will be entitled to receive, without obligation to a third party, a 

greater proportion of the future estimated tax benefit of the Tax Basis Increase. This will be reflected over time in increases in 
operating cash. 

We currently have authorization from our Board to purchase up to $150 million of our common stock up to July 25, 2010. 
Through December 31, 2009, we have used $83.0 million of the authorized amount to acquire shares of our common stock. The 
program will be funded either through our future cash flows or through borrowings on our credit facility. Share repurchases will be 
made on the open market and may be commenced or suspended at any time. The Company's management, based on its evaluation of 
market and economic conditions and other factors, will determine the timing and number of shares repurchased. 

Management believes that we can adequately fund our cash needs during the next 12 months. 

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements 

We have the following off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2009: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Operating leases.  We lease office space, office equipment and computer equipment under long-term operating leases, 
which are recorded in occupancy and equipment or technology leasing and support. 

Extension of credit to customers.  We have entered into commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of 
business. We had approximately $2.8 billion of commitments to extend credit at December 31, 2009, as part of 
established lending product agreements. These amounts may increase or decrease during 2010 as we extend or contract 
credit to customers, subject to our appropriate credit reviews, as part of our lending product agreements. Many of these 
commitments are not expected to be utilized; therefore, we do not believe total unused credit available to customers 
and customers of strategic relationships represents future cash requirements. We can increase or decrease our 
customers' credit lines at our discretion at any time. We believe that we can adequately fund actual cash requirements 
related to these credit commitments through the issuance of certificates of deposit and borrowed federal funds. 

Letters of credit.  We are required to post collateral to secure our fuel price sensitive derivative instruments based on 
any unrealized loss, less any unsecured credit granted by our counter party. At December 31, 2009, we had no 
unsecured credit nor had we posted a letter of credit for collateral as these instruments were in an unrealized gain 
position. We have posted a $2.1 million letter of credit as collateral under the terms of our lease agreement for our 
corporate offices. 

31

Contractual Obligations 

The table below summarizes the estimated dollar amounts of payments under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009, 

for the periods specified: 

(in thousands) 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

2014 and 
Thereafter 

Total 

Operating leases: 
  Facilities 
  Equipment, including vehicles 
Preferred stock (a)
Revolving line-of-credit (b)
Tax receivable agreement
Deposits 
Borrowed federal funds 
Interest rate swap arrangements (c)
Purchase obligations: 
  Technology services 

$

2,135  $
1,959 
183 
— 
7,943 
308,266 
71,723 
538 

1,941  $
1,390 
183 
— 
8,130 
106,730 
— 
314 

1,751  $
943 
183 
128,000 
8,483 
— 
— 
— 

1,751  $
54 
183 
— 
8,883 
— 
— 
— 

7,909  $
3 
10,275 
— 
74,314 
— 
— 
— 

15,487 
4,349 
11,007 
128,000 
107,753 
414,996 
71,723 
852 

2,132 

1,075 

— 

— 

— 

3,207 

Total

$

394,879  $

119,763  $

139,360  $

10,871  $

92,501  $

757,374 

(a)  Assumes December 31, 2009, rate of 1.79% and redemption on February 22, 2015. See Item 8 – Note 13, Preferred Stock. 
(b)  Our revolving line-of-credit is set to expire in May of 2012. Amounts in table exclude interest payments. See Item 8 – Note 11, Financing Debt. 
(c) Payments on interest rate swap arrangements have been estimated using the December 31, 2009 LIBOR rates. Any change to this rate will impact 

future payments. 

32

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial 

statements, which have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. We continually evaluate our judgments 
and estimates in determination of our financial condition and operating results. We base our estimates on historical experience and on 
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making 
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates are based on 
information available as of the date of the financial statements and, accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates,
sometimes materially. Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those that are both most important to the portrayal of 
our financial condition and operating results and require management's most subjective judgments. Our consolidated financial 
statements are based on the selection and application of critical accounting policies and estimates, the most significant of which are 
included in the tables below. 

Reserve for Credit Losses 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

  The reserve for losses relating to 
accounts receivable represents 
management's estimate of the losses 
inherent in the Company's outstanding 
portfolio of receivables. The reserve for 
credit losses reduces the Company's 
accounts receivable balances as 
reported in its financial statements to 
their net realizable value. 

  Reserves for these losses are primarily 
based on a model that analyzes specific 
portfolio statistics, including average 
charge-off rates for various stages of 
receivable aging (i.e. current, 30 days, 
60 days, 90 days) over historical periods 
and average bankruptcy and recovery 
rates. Receivables are generally written 
off when they are 150 days past due or 
declaration of bankruptcy by the 
customer. 

Also, the reserve reflects management's 
judgment regarding overall reserve 
adequacy. Management considers 
whether to adjust the reserve that is 
calculated by the analytic model based 
on other factors, such as the actual 
charge-offs for the preceding reporting 
periods, expected charge-offs and 
recoveries for the subsequent reporting 
periods, a review of accounts receivable 
balances which become past due, 
changes in customer payment patterns, 
known fraudulent activity in the 
portfolio, as well as leading economic 
and market indicators. 

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

  To the extent historical credit 

experience is not indicative of future 
performance, actual loss experience 
could differ significantly from 
management's judgments and 
expectations, resulting in either higher 
or lower future provisions for credit 
losses, as applicable. 

As of December 31, 2009, we have 
estimated a reserve for credit losses 
which is 1.3 percent of the total gross 
accounts receivable balance. An 
increase to this reserve by 0.5 percent 
to approximately1.8 percent would 
increase the provision for credit losses 
for the year by $4.2 million. 
Conversely, a decrease to this reserve 
by 0.5 percent to approximately 
0.8 percent would decrease the 
provision for credit losses for the year 
by $4.2 million. 

33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

  The Company regularly reviews its 

deferred tax assets for recoverability. 
Management's determination of whether 
an allowance is required is based on 
historical taxable income or loss, 
projected future taxable income or loss, 
the expected timing of the reversals of 
existing temporary differences and the 
implementation of tax planning 
strategies. 

  The Company recognizes deferred tax 
assets and liabilities based on the 
differences between the financial 
statement carrying amounts and the tax 
bases of assets and liabilities. Future 
realization of the tax benefit of existing 
deductible temporary differences is 
contingent upon our ability to generate 
sufficient future taxable income within 
the carry back and carry forward 
periods available under tax law. We 
have established a valuation allowance 
of $220 thousand against certain of our 
state net operating losses. A valuation 
allowance has been established for 
those state net operating losses that the 
Company believes it is more likely than 
not that they will not be utilized within 
the carry forward period. No other 
valuation allowances have been 
established at this time as management 
believes that it is more likely than not 
that the Company will realize the 
benefits of the other deferred tax assets. 

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

If the Company is unable to generate 
sufficient future taxable income, or if 
there is a significant change in the time 
period within which the underlying 
temporary differences become taxable 
or deductible, the Company may be 
required to establish additional 
valuation allowances against its 
deferred tax assets. 

At December 31, 2009, the Company 
had approximately $293 million of 
gross deferred tax assets. These 
deferred tax assets consisted primarily 
of temporary differences related to tax 
deductible goodwill. The Company also 
had gross deferred tax liabilities of 
approximately $109 million primarily 
consisting of temporary non-tax 
deductible goodwill with an indefinite 
reversal period. 

A determination that no deferred tax 
assets would be realized at 
December 31, 2009, would require the 
establishment of additional valuation 
allowances determined without regard 
to existing deferred tax liabilities with 
indefinite reversal periods. This would 
increase the provision for income taxes 
by approximately $284 million. 
However, under the terms of the tax 
receivable agreement with Wyndham, 
to the extent that the Company was 
unable to utilize the tax benefits created 
as a consequence of the Company's 
separation from Avis, as modified by 
the June 26, 2009 Ratification 
Agreement, the Company would realize 
a gain of approximately $91 million. 
Therefore, a valuation allowance 
against 100% of our deferred tax assets 
coupled with a like judgment 
concerning the likelihood of the 
payment of amounts owing to 
Wyndham, would decrease net income 
by approximately $193 million. 

34

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

  Goodwill is comprised of the cost of 
business acquisitions in excess of the 
fair value assigned to the net tangible 
and identifiable intangible assets 
acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but 
is reviewed for impairment annually, or 
when events or changes in the business 
environment indicate that the carrying 
value of the reporting unit may exceed 
its fair value. Our other acquired 
intangibles include assets that amortize; 
primarily software and customer 
relationships, and those that do not 
amortize; specifically trademarks and 
trade names. The annual review is 
performed as of October 1 of each year.  
Acquired intangible assets result from 
the allocation of the cost of an 
acquisition. Certain intangibles are not 
amortized; others are amortized to 
expense over time. 

  For the reporting units that carry 

goodwill balances, our impairment test 
consists of a comparison of each 
reporting unit’s carrying value to its 
estimated fair value. A reporting unit, 
for the purpose of the impairment test, is 
one level below the operating segment 
level.  We have two reporting segments 
that are further broken into several 
reporting units for the impairment 
review. The estimated fair value of a 
reporting unit is primarily based on 
discounted estimated future cash flows. 
We generally validate the model by 
applying a market valuation approach – 
specifically considering other factors 
such as the fair value of comparable 
companies to our reporting units, and a 
reconciliation of the fair value of all our 
reporting units to our overall market 
capitalization. The assumptions used to 
estimate the discounted cash flows are 
based on our best estimates about 
payment processing fees/interchange 
rates, sales volumes, costs (including 
fuel prices), future growth rates, capital 
expenditures and market conditions over 
an estimate of the remaining operating 
period at the reporting unit level. The 
discount rate is based on the weighted 
average cost of capital that is determined 
by evaluating the risk free rate of return, 
cost of debt, and expected equity 
premiums.

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

  We review the carrying values of the 
amortizing assets for impairment 
whenever events or changes in business 
circumstances indicate that the carrying 
amount of an asset may not be 
recoverable. Such circumstances would 
include, but are not limited to, a 
significant decrease in the perceived 
market price of the intangible, a 
significant adverse change in the way 
the asset is being used, or a history of 
operating or cash flow losses associated 
with the use of the intangible. 

Our goodwill resides in multiple 
reporting units. The profitability of 
individual reporting units may suffer 
periodically from downturns in 
customer demand or other economic 
factors. Individual reporting units may 
be relatively more impacted than the 
Company as a whole. Specifically, 
during times of economic slowdown, 
our customers may reduce their 
expenditures. As a result, demand for 
the services of one or more of the 
reporting units could decline which 
could adversely affect our operations, 
cash flow, and liquidity and could 
result in an impairment of goodwill or 
intangible assets.

As of December 31, 2009, the 
Company had an aggregate of 
approximately $350 million on its 
balance sheet related to goodwill and 
intangible assets of acquired entities. 
Within this total, approximately 
$4 million of non-goodwill assets were 
classified as indefinite-lived, comprised 
principally of trademarks and trade 
names. While we currently believe that 
the fair value of all of our intangibles 
exceeds carrying value and that those 
intangibles so classified will contribute 
indefinitely to the cash flows of the 
Company, materially different 
assumptions regarding future 
performance of our reporting units or 
the weighted-average cost of capital 
used in the valuations could result in 
significant impairment losses and/or 
amortization expense. 

35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Valuation of Derivatives 

Description 

Assumptions/Approach Used 

Effect if Actual Results Differ from 
Assumptions 

  The Company has entered into several 

  None of the derivatives that exist have 

  As of December 31, 2009, the 

readily determinable fair market values. 
Management determines fair value 
through alternative valuation 
approaches, primarily modeling that 
considers over-the-counter market 
quotations, time value and volatility 
factors and counterparty credit risk. On a 
periodic basis, management reviews the 
statements provided by the counterparty 
to ensure the fair market values are 
reasonable when compared to the market 
value of the underlying commodity. 

Company had established that the net 
fair value of the derivatives was an 
asset of approximately $6 million. 
Changes in fuel prices, interest rates 
and other variables have a significant 
impact on the value of the derivatives. 

Should either (i) the variables 
underlying pricing methodologies; (ii) 
the creditworthiness of the counterparty 
or (iii) the methodologies themselves 
substantially change, our results of 
operations could significantly change. 

financial arrangements that are 
considered to be derivative 
transactions. Where the Company has 
entered into interest rate swaps, the 
derivatives have been designated as 
cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the 
interest rate swaps are recorded at their 
fair value on the consolidated balance 
sheet. The changes in fair value of the 
interest rate swaps are recorded as a 
component of other comprehensive 
income rather than in earnings. Where 
the Company has entered into fuel price 
derivatives, no hedging relationship has 
been designated. Accordingly, when 
the derivatives are marked to their 
market value, the related gains or losses 
are recognized currently in earnings. 

Changes to Accounting Policies 

None. 

36

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

The Company has entered into market risk sensitive instruments for purposes other than trading. The discussion below 

highlights quantitative and qualitative matters related to these instruments. 

Interest Rate Risk 

At December 31, 2009, we had borrowings of $128.0 million on our credit facility that bore interest at a floating rate equal to
the one-month LIBOR plus 57.5 basis points. During 2009 we entered into an interest rate swap contract that ends in July 2012 that 
fixed the interest rate on $50 million of the variable rate revolving credit facility. 

The following table presents the impact of changes in LIBOR on projected financing interest expense for 2010 on the unhedged 

portion of the principal outstanding under the credit facility (see the discussion of our interest rate swaps in Item 7 in the "Liquidity, 
Capital Resources and Cash Flows" section): 

(in thousands) 

Projected financing interest expense on variable rate portion of debt (one-month LIBOR equal 
to 0.29338 %) 

Increases to LIBOR of: 

2.00% 
5.00% 
  10.00% 

(a)

Impact

$

205 

  $
  $
  $

1,400 
3,500 
7,000 

(a) Changes to financing interest expense presented in this table are based on interest payments on the revolving credit facility that bear interest based 

on one-month LIBOR, based on outstanding balance and rate at December 31, 2009. 

37

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Price Risk 

As discussed in the "Fuel Price Derivatives" section of Item 1, we use derivative instruments to manage the impact of volatility

in fuel prices. We enter into put and call option contracts ("Options") based on the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline and retail
price of diesel fuel, which settle on a monthly basis through the second quarter of 2011. The Options are intended to lock in a range of 
prices during any given quarter on a portion of our forecasted earnings subject to fuel price variations. Our fuel price risk management 
program is designed to purchase derivative instruments to manage our fuel price-related earnings exposure. 

The following table presents information about the Options: 

December 31, 

2009 

2008 

Put Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Call Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons) (b)

Fair Value 

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons) 

Fair Value 

Fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 
  Options settling October 2010 – June 2011 
  Options settling July 2010 – March 2011 
  Options settling April 2010 – December 2010 
  Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
  Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
  Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
  Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
  Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
  Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
  Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

  Total fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 

Fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 
  Options settling October 2010 – June 2011 
  Options settling July 2010 – March 2011 
  Options settling April 2010 – December 2010 
  Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
  Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
  Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
  Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
  Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
  Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
  Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

2.013   $
1.953   $
1.906   $
2.860   $
2.430   $
2.443   $
2.040   $
1.970   $
1.850   $
1.733   $

3.000   $
3.000   $
2.936   $
4.040   $
3.515   $
3.500   $
2.975   $
2.870   $
2.865   $
2.753   $

2.073  
2.013  
1.966  
2.920  
2.490  
2.503  
2.100  
2.030  
1.910  
1.793  

3.060  
3.060  
2.996  
4.100  
3.575  
3.560  
3.035  
2.930  
2.925  
2.813  

5,836  
6,209  
4,642  
5,219  
5,302  
2,573  
—  
—  
—  
—  

(578 ) 
(754 ) 
(776 ) 
3,349  
1,418  
852  
—  
—  
—  
—  

—  
—  
—  
5,219  
7,860  
7,688  
7,822  
7,674  
4,831  
2,581  

—  
—  
—  
7,000  
7,938  
8,463  
5,687  
5,512  
3,097  
1,637  

29,781  

3,511  

43,675  

39,334  

2,622  
2,790  
2,085  
2,345  
2,382  
1,156  
—  
—  
—  
—  

(437 ) 
(342 ) 
(292 ) 
2,186  
1,034  
492  
—  
—  
—  
—  

—  
—  
—  
2,345  
3,531  
3,454  
3,514  
3,448  
2,170  
1,160  

—  
—  
—  
2,561  
2,311  
2,391  
987  
863  
611  
236  

  Total fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 

13,380  

2,641  

19,622  

9,960  

Total fuel price derivative instruments 

43,161  

6,152  

63,297  

49,294  

(a)  The settlement of the Options is based upon the New York Mercantile Exchange's New York Harbor Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen 

Blending and the U.S. Department of Energy's weekly retail on-highway diesel fuel price for the month. 

(b)  The Options settle on a monthly basis. 

38

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

Page

40

41

42

43

44

45

(cid:3)

39

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Wright Express Corporation 
South Portland, Maine  

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wright Express Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as 
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of 
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009.  We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting 
as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of 
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, 
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over 
financial reporting, included in “Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” appearing at Item 9A.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal
control over financial reporting based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are 
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  
Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the 
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of 
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and 
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as 
we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.  

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors,
management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of 
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company's internal control 
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, 
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that 
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized 
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper 
management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to 
the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.  

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 
the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the 
period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also,
in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 
2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

February 25, 2010 

40

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Assets 
  Cash and cash equivalents 
  Accounts receivable (less reserve for credit losses of $10,660 in 2009 and $18,435 in 2008) 

Income taxes receivable 
  Available-for-sale securities 
  Fuel price derivatives, at fair value 
  Property, equipment and capitalized software, net 
  Deferred income taxes, net 
  Goodwill 
  Other intangible assets, net 
  Other assets 

Total assets 

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 
  Accounts payable 
  Accrued expenses 

Income taxes payable 

  Deposits 
  Borrowed federal funds 
  Revolving line-of-credit facilities 
  Other liabilities 
  Amounts due under tax receivable agreement 
  Preferred stock; 10,000 shares authorized: 

  Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock; 

  0.1 shares issued and outstanding 

  Total liabilities 

  Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) 

Stockholders' Equity 
  Common stock $0.01 par value; 175,000 shares authorized, 41,167 in 2009 

  and 40,966 in 2008 shares issued; 38,196 in 2009 and 38,244 in 2008 shares outstanding 

  Additional paid-in capital 
  Retained earnings 
  Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: 

  Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities 
  Net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps 
  Net foreign currency translation adjustment 

  Accumulated other comprehensive loss 

  Less treasury stock at cost, 2,971 shares in 2009 and 2,722 shares in 2008 

  Total stockholders' equity 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

December 31, 

2009 

2008

$ 

39,304  $

844,152 
—
10,596 
6,152 
44,991 
183,602 
315,227 
34,815 
20,823 

183,117 
702,225 
7,903 
12,533 
49,294 
44,864 
239,957 
315,230 
39,922 
16,810 

$  1,499,662  $ 1,611,855 

$ 

283,149  $
30,861 
1,758 
423,287 
71,723 
128,000 
1,815 
107,753 

249,067 
34,931 
—
540,146 
—
170,600 
3,083 
309,366 

10,000 

10,000 

  1,058,346 

1,317,193 

412 
112,063 
412,138 

23 
(176)
(134)

(287)

410 
100,359 
272,479 

(53)
(1,736)
(55)

(1,844)

(83,010)

(76,742)

441,316 

294,662 

$  1,499,662  $ 1,611,855 

41

 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Service Revenues 
  Payment processing revenue 
  Transaction processing revenue 
  Account servicing revenue 
  Finance fees 
  Other 

  Total service revenues 

Product Revenues 
  Hardware and equipment sales 

  Total revenues 

Expenses 
  Salary and other personnel 
  Service fees 
  Provision for credit losses 
  Technology leasing and support 
  Occupancy and equipment 
  Advertising 
  Marketing 
  Postage and shipping 
  Communications 
  Depreciation and amortization 
  Operating interest expense 
  Cost of hardware and equipment sold 
  Other 

  Total operating expenses 

Operating income 

Financing interest expense 
Loss on foreign currency transactions 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 
Gain on settlement of portion of amounts due under tax receivable agreement 
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on fuel price derivatives 
(Increase) decrease in amount due under tax receivable agreement 

Income before income taxes 

Income taxes 

Net income 

Earnings per share: 
  Basic 
  Diluted 

Weighted average common shares outstanding: 
  Basic 
  Diluted 

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

42

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

215,620  $
17,532 
37,001 
32,816 
12,011 

297,441  $
19,339 
30,631 
31,043 
11,549 

257,493 
14,452 
26,767 
26,885 
10,253 

314,980 

390,003 

335,850 

3,244 

3,579 

278 

318,224 

393,582 

336,128 

75,123 
27,666 
17,715 
9,327 
8,718 
4,974 
2,737 
3,105 
2,703 
21,930 
13,274 
2,803 
9,999 

66,969 
20,361 
45,021 
8,510 
9,159 
5,283 
3,215 
3,248 
2,527 
20,123 
34,993 
3,155 
9,586 

65,014 
14,987 
20,569 
8,738 
6,091 
4,711 
1,879 
3,433 
2,163 
15,018 
34,086 
224 
7,123 

200,074 

232,150 

184,036 

118,150 

161,432 

152,092 

(6,210) 
(40) 
—
136,485 
(22,542) 
(599) 

(11,859)
—
— 
—
55,206 
(9,014)

(12,677)
—
(1,572)
—
(53,610)
78,904 

225,244 

195,765 

163,137 

85,585 

68,125 

111,560 

139,659  $

127,640  $

51,577 

3.65  $
3.55  $

3.28  $
3.22  $

1.29 
1.27 

38,303 
39,364 

38,885 
39,787 

40,042 
40,751 

$

$
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 
(in thousands) 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

40,966 
44 
157 
41,167 

40,798 
30 
138 
40,966 

$

410  $

—
2
412 

100,359 
7,358 
585 
(516) 
4,277 
112,063 

272,479 
139,659 
412,138 

408  $
— 
2 
410 

98,174 
(1,379)
415 
113 
3,036 
100,359 

144,839 
127,640 
272,479 

(1,844) 

(1,451)

76 

(4)

1,560 
(79) 
1,557 

(287)   

(319)
(70)
(393)
(1,844)

40,430 
250 
118 
40,798 

404 
3 
1 
408 

89,325 
—
3,456 
3,023 
2,370 
98,174 

93,262 
51,577 
144,839 

136 

49 

(1,651)
15 
(1,587)
(1,451)

(76,742) 

(37,711)

—

(6,268) 
(83,010) 

(39,031)
(76,742)

(37,711)
(37,711)

441,316  $

294,662  $

204,259 

139,659  $
1,557 
141,216  $

127,640  $
(393)
127,247  $

51,577 
(1,587)
49,990 

$

$

$

Number of common shares issued 
  Balance, beginning of period 

  Stock issued to employees exercising stock options 
  Stock issued to employees for vesting of restricted stock units 

  Balance, end of period 

Common stock 
  Balance, beginning of period 

  Stock issued to employees exercising stock options 
  Stock issued to employees for vesting of restricted stock units 

  Balance, end of period 

Additional paid-in capital 
  Balance, beginning of period 

  Net adjustment resulting from tax impact of the initial public offering 
  Stock issued to employees exercising stock options 
  Tax benefit from employees' stock option and restricted stock plans 
  Stock-based compensation 

  Balance, end of period 

Retained earnings 
  Balance, beginning of period 

  Net income 

  Balance, end of period 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income 
  Balance, beginning of period 

  Changes in available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of, $42 in 2009, 

  $(3) in 2008 and $27 in 2007 

  Changes in interest rate swaps, net of tax effect of $904 in 2009, 

  $(208) in 2008 and $(960) in 2007 

  Foreign currency translation 

  Net other comprehensive (loss) income adjustments 

  Balance, end of period 

Treasury stock 
  Balance, beginning of period 

  Purchase of shares of treasury stock; 249 shares in 2009,  

  1,549 shares in 2008 and 1,173 shares in 2007 

  Balance, end of period 

Total stockholders' equity 

Comprehensive income 
  Net income 
  Net other comprehensive (loss) income adjustments 
Total comprehensive income 

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

43

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
(in thousands) 

Cash flows from operating activities 
  Net income 
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: 

  Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments 
  Stock-based compensation 
  Depreciation and amortization 
  Loss on extinguishment of debt 
  Gain on settlement of portion of amounts due under tax receivable agreement 
  Loss on sale of investment 
  Deferred taxes 
  Provision for credit losses 
  Loss on disposal and impairment of property and equipment 
  Loss on impairment of internal-use software under development 
  Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: 

  Accounts receivable 
  Other assets 
  Accounts payable 
  Accrued expenses 

Income taxes 
  Other liabilities 
  Amounts due under tax receivable agreement 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

139,659  $

127,640  $

51,577 

43,142 
5,736 
22,559 
—

(136,485) 
15 
59,558 
17,715 
44 
814 

(159,623) 
(4,641) 
34,053 
(1,651) 
12,348 
(1,282) 
(65,128) 

(90,892)
5,216 
20,588 
— 
—
—
41,967 
45,021 
108 
1,538 

362,444 
(328)
(156,463)
(1,105)
(4,934)
(1,475)
(10,146)

37,074 
4,508 
15,719 
1,572 
—
—
95,117 
20,569 
—
—

(286,236)
(2,163)
66,048 
6,756 
(4,147)
364 
(98,847)

  Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 

(33,167) 

339,179 

(92,089)

Cash flows from investing activities 
  Purchases of property and equipment 
  Sale of available-for-sale securities 
  Purchases of available-for-sale securities 
  Maturities of available-for-sale securities 
  Purchases of fleet card receivables 
  Purchase of trade name 
  Acquisitions, net of cash acquired 

  Net cash used for investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 
  Excess tax benefits from equity instrument share-based payment arrangements 
  Repurchase of share-based awards to satisfy tax withholdings 
  Proceeds from stock option exercises 
  Net (decrease) increase in deposits 
  Net increase (decrease) in borrowed federal funds 
  Net (repayments) borrowings on 2007 revolving line-of-credit facility 
  Loan origination fees paid for 2007 revolving line-of-credit facility 
  Net repayments on 2005 revolving line-of-credit facility 
  Repayments on term loan 
  Repayments of acquired debt 
  Purchase of shares of treasury stock 

(17,848) 

7
(160) 
2,194 
—
—
—

(16,111)
—
(4,301)
1,255 
— 
(44)
(41,613)

(16,624)
—
(2,518)
1,123 
(1,922)
—
(40,806)

(15,807) 

(60,814)

(60,747)

—

(1,464) 
585 
(116,859) 
71,723 
(42,600) 

—
—
—
—

(6,268) 

113 
(2,225)
415 
(58,943)
(8,175)
(28,800)
(1,556)
— 
— 
— 
(39,031)

3,023 
(2,188)
3,459 
204,390 
(57,221)
199,400 
(998)
(20,000)
(131,000)
(374)
(37,711)

  Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities 

(94,883) 

(138,202)

160,780 

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 

44 

(65)

15 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 

(143,813) 
183,117 

140,098 
43,019 

7,959 
35,060 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period 

$

39,304  $

183,117  $

43,019 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

44

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

1.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business Description 

Wright Express Corporation is a leading provider of payment processing and information management products and services to 

the United States commercial and government vehicle fleet industry. The Company provides products and services in the United 
States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Europe. Together with the Company’s affiliates, Wright Express markets its products and
services directly, as well as through more than 150 strategic relationships which include major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle 
maintenance providers. Wright Express also offers a MasterCard-branded corporate card. 

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Wright Express for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 

2007, include the accounts of Wright Express and its majority owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. 

For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, hardware and equipment sales, marketing expense and cost of hardware and 
equipment sold exceeded the Company's threshold for individual disclosure and were shown separately on the consolidated statements 
of income. In prior periods, hardware and equipment sales had been included in other revenues, and marketing expense and cost of
hardware and equipment sold had been included in other expenses. Prior period statements have been conformed to the 2009 
presentation.  

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of 
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and 
expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and those differences may be material. 

Cash and Cash Equivalents 

Highly liquid investments with remaining maturities at the time of purchase of three months or less (that are readily convertible

to cash) are considered to be cash equivalents and are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Cash equivalents include
federal funds sold, which are unsecured short-term investments entered into with financial institutions. 

Accounts Receivable and Reserve for Credit Losses 

Accounts receivable balances are stated at net realizable value. The balance includes a reserve for credit losses which reflects

management's estimate of uncollectible balances resulting from credit and fraud losses. The reserve for credit losses is established 
based on the determination of the amount of probable credit losses inherent in the accounts receivable as of the reporting date.
Management reviews delinquency reports, historical collection rates, economic trends, and other information in order to make the
necessary judgments as to probable credit losses. Management also uses historical charge off experience to determine the amount of 
losses inherent in accounts receivable at the reporting date. Assumptions regarding probable credit losses are reviewed periodically
and may be impacted by actual performance of accounts receivable and changes in any of the factors discussed above. 

Available-for-sale Securities 

The Company records certain of its investments as available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair

value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported on the consolidated balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive 
income. Realized gains and losses and declines in fair value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are 
included in non operating revenues and expenses. The cost basis of securities is based on the specific identification method. Interest
and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in other revenues. 

45

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Derivatives

The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall strategy to manage its exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices and 

to reduce the impact of interest rate volatility. As a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative 
purposes. All derivatives are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company's fuel price derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Gains or losses related to fuel 

price derivative instruments, both realized and unrealized, are recognized currently in earnings. These instruments are presented on the 
consolidated balance sheet as fuel price derivatives, at fair value. 

The Company's interest rate derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges and, accordingly, the change in fair value associated

with the effective portion of these derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment is recorded as a component of 
other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion, if any, is reported currently in earnings. Amounts included in other 
comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged item affects earnings. These 
instruments are presented as either other assets or accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet. 

The Company assesses the hedge effectiveness of the interest rate swaps in accordance with the requirements outlined in the 

accounting standards. For these hedges, management documents, both at inception and over the life of the hedge, at least quarterly, its 
analysis of actual and expected hedge effectiveness. For those hedging relationships in which the critical terms of the entire debt 
instrument and the derivative are identical, and the creditworthiness of the counterparty to the hedging instrument remains sound, 
there is no hedge ineffectiveness so long as those conditions continue to be met. 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Replacements, renewals and improvements are 

capitalized and costs for repair and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives shown below. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lesser of 
the useful life of the asset or remaining lease term. 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment 
Computer software 
Leasehold improvements 

Capitalized Software

Estimated Useful Lives 

5 to 7 years 
18 months to 7 years 
5 to 15 years 

The Company develops software that is used in providing processing and information management services to customers. A 

significant portion of the Company's capital expenditures are for the development of internal-use computer software. Software 
development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of the software has been established. Costs incurred prior to 
establishing technological feasibility are expensed as incurred. Technological feasibility is established when the Company has 
completed all planning, designing, coding and testing activities that are necessary to determine that the software can be produced to 
meet its design specifications, including functions, features and technical performance requirements. Capitalization of costs ceases 
when the software is ready for its intended use. Software development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful life of the software. Capitalized costs include interest costs incurred while developing internal-use computer software. 
Amounts capitalized for software were $14,030 in 2009, $14,962 in 2008 and $16,737 in 2007. Amortization for software totaled 
$15,698 in 2009, $13,650 in 2008 and $11,452 in 2007. 

46

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company classifies intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization,

(2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and (3) goodwill. The Company tests intangible assets with 
definite lives for impairment if conditions exist that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Such conditions may include 
an economic downturn or a change in the assessment of future operations. The Company records an impairment charge when the 
carrying value of the definite-lived intangible asset is not recoverable from the undiscounted cash flows generated from the use of the 
asset.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill are not amortized. The Company tests these intangible assets and goodwill 

for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that such intangible assets or goodwill might be 
impaired. All goodwill and intangible assets are assigned to reporting units, which are one level below the Company's operating
segments. Goodwill and intangible assets are assigned to the reporting unit which benefits from the synergies arising from each
business combination. The Company performs its impairment tests at its reporting unit level. Such impairment tests include comparing
the fair value of the respective reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. The Company uses a variety of 
methodologies to estimate fair value, including discounted cash flow analyses. Certain assumptions are used in determining the fair 
value, including assumptions about future cash flows and terminal values. When appropriate, the Company considers the assumptions 
that it believes hypothetical marketplace participants would use in estimating future cash flows. In addition, where applicable, an 
appropriate discount rate is used, based on the Company's cost of capital or reporting unit-specific economic factors. When the fair 
value is less than the carrying value of the intangible assets or the reporting unit, the Company records an impairment charge to reduce 
the carrying value of the assets to fair value. Impairment charges are recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the
consolidated statement of income. The Company's annual goodwill and intangible assets impairment test, performed as of October 1,
did not identify any impairment in any of the years presented. 

The Company determines the useful lives of our identifiable intangible assets after considering the specific facts and 
circumstances related to each intangible asset. Factors management considers when determining useful lives include the contractual 
term of any agreement, the history of the asset, the Company's long-term strategy for the use of the asset, any laws or other local
regulations which could impact the useful life of the asset and other economic factors, including competition and specific market
conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized over their useful lives, which is the period of time 
that the asset is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. An evaluation of the remaining useful lives of the 
definite-lived intangible assets is performed periodically to determine if any change is warranted. 

All business combinations occurred prior to January 1, 2009. Accordingly, the accounting guidance utilized was relevant for 

those prior periods. This guidance required that acquisition costs be capitalized rather than expensed. All other differences between the 
two standards were not material. 

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as a reduction in operating cash 

flow or a dramatic change in the manner the asset is intended to be used, indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be 
recoverable. If indicators exist, the Company compares the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with these assets or 
operations to their carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value (normally measured by the expected present value 
technique) is required. The Company recognized $858 of impairment expense on its long-lived assets during the year ended 
December 31, 2009.  Impairment expense of $1,646 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2008, and no impairment 
expense was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2007. These amounts were recorded in occupancy and equipment in the 
consolidated statements of income. 

Other Assets

The Company has an investment in the stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $1,562 for all years presented, which is 

carried at cost and not considered a readily marketable security. This investment is included in other assets on the consolidated
balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has concluded that the investment is not impaired. 

47

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deposits, borrowed 

federal funds and other liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The 
carrying values of the revolving line-of-credit facilities and preferred stock approximate their respective fair values as the interest rates 
on these financial instruments are variable. The rates are tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and adjust at least
quarterly. All other financial instruments are reflected at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. 

Revenue Recognition

The majority of the Company's revenues are comprised of transaction-based fees, which typically are calculated based on 
measures such as percentage of (i) dollar volume processed; (ii) number of transactions processed; or (iii) some combination thereof. 
The Company has entered into agreements with major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle maintenance providers which provide
products or products and services to the Company’s customers. These agreements specify that a transaction is deemed to be captured 
when the Company has validated that the transaction has no errors and has accepted and posted the data to the Company's records. The 
Company recognizes revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the products and services have been provided to 
the client, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. 

A description of the major components of revenue is as follows: 

Payment Processing Revenue.    Revenue consists of transaction fees assessed to major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle 
maintenance providers. The fee charged is generally based upon a percentage of the total transaction amount; however, it may also be 
based on a fixed amount charged per transaction or, on a combination of both measures. The fee is deducted from the Company's 
payment to the major oil company, fuel retailer or vehicle maintenance provider and recorded as revenue at the time the transaction is 
captured.

Interchange income is earned by the Company's MasterCard products and is included in payment processing revenue. 
Interchange income is a fee paid by a merchant bank to the card-issuing bank through the interchange network. Interchange fees are 
set by MasterCard International Inc. and are based on cardholder purchase volumes. The Company recognizes interchange income as
earned. 

Transaction Processing Revenue.    The Company earns transaction fees, which are principally based on the number of 
transactions processed; however, the fees may be a percentage of the total transaction amount. These fees are recognized at the time 
the transaction is captured. 

Account Servicing Revenue.    Revenue is primarily comprised of monthly fees based on fleet accounts on file, both active and 

inactive. These fees are primarily in return for providing monthly vehicle data reports. Account servicing revenue is recognized
monthly, as the Company fulfills its contractual service obligations. 

Finance Fees.    The Company earns revenue by assessing monthly finance fees on accounts with overdue balances. These fees 
are recognized as revenue, net of a provision for uncollectible accounts, at the time the fees are assessed. The reserve for uncollectible 
finance fee income totaled $392 at December 31, 2009, $1,117 at December 31, 2008, and $987 at December 31, 2007. This reserve is
in addition to the Company’s reserve for credit losses. 

Other.    The Company assesses fees for providing ancillary services, such as information products and services, professional 
services and marketing services. Other revenues also include fees for overnight shipping, certain customized electronic reporting and 
customer contact services provided on behalf of certain of the Company's customers. The Company also assesses fees for holding 
receivables related to certain transaction processing transactions. Service-related revenues are recognized in the period that the work is 
performed. 

Interest and dividends earned on investments in available-for-sale securities also are included in other revenues, as well as 

realized gains and losses on such investments. Investment-related income is recognized in the period that it is earned. 

48

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Hardware and Equipment Sales.    The Company sells telematics devices as part of its WEXSmartTM telematics program. In 
addition, the Company sells assorted equipment to its Pacific Pride franchisees. The Company recognizes revenue from these sales
when the customer has accepted delivery of the product and collectability of the sales amount is reasonably assured. 

From time to time the Company provides rebates and/or incentives to certain customers and selected strategic relationships in 
order to induce them to use the Company's payment processing or transaction processing services. The revenues described above are
net of rebates and incentives provided to customers. Rebates are recorded in the period in which they are earned. Incentives are
recognized on a pro rata basis over the term of the contract and derecognized only when a determination is made that the targeted 
objective will not be achieved. 

Stock-Based Compensation 

The Company sponsors restricted stock award plans and stock option plans. The Company recognizes compensation expense related 
to employee stock awards over their vesting periods based upon the fair value of the award on the date of grant. In instances where 
vesting is dependent upon the realization of certain performance goals, compensation is estimated and amortized over the vesting
period. 

Advertising Costs 

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed in the period the advertising occurs. 

Income Taxes 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the 
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities 
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are 
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period 
that includes the enactment date. The realizability of deferred tax assets must also be assessed. The ultimate realization of deferred tax 
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the associated temporary differences
became deductible. A valuation allowance must be established for deferred tax assets which are not believed to more likely than not be 
realized in the future. Deferred taxes are not provided for the undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries that are 
considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States. 

The impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return is recognized at the largest amount that is more likely
than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has 
less than a 50 percent likelihood of being sustained. The Company has not currently recognized a material liability for unrecognized 
tax benefits. The Company will recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of its income tax
provision should such liabilities arise. 

49

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Earnings per Common Share 

When diluted earnings per common share is calculated, weighted-average outstanding shares are adjusted for the dilutive effect 

of shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of the Company's convertible, redeemable preferred stock and common stock 
equivalents, which consist of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock units. The dividends expensed on convertible, 
redeemable preferred stock are added back to net income when the related common stock equivalents are included in the computation 
of diluted earnings per common share. Holders of unvested restricted stock units are not entitled to participate in dividends, should 
they be declared. 

Income available for common stockholders used to calculate earnings per share is as follows: 

Income available for common stockholders – Basic 
Convertible, redeemable preferred stock 

Income available for common stockholders – Diluted 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

$

139,659   $
248

127,640  $
474 

51,577 
—

139,907   $

128,114  $

51,577 

Weighted average common shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share are as follows: 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic 
Unvested restricted stock units 
Stock options 
Convertible, redeemable preferred stock 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

38,303
396
221
444

38,885 
419 
39 
444 

40,042 
605 
104 
—

Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted 

39,364

39,787 

40,751 

The following were not included in Weighted average common shares 

outstanding - Diluted because they are anti-dilutive: 

  Convertible, redeemable preferred stock 

—

— 

444 

Foreign Currency Translation 

The financial statements of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar, are
translated to U.S. dollars as prescribed by the accounting literature. Assets and liabilities are translated at the year end spot exchange 
rate, revenue and expenses at average exchange rates and equity transactions at historical exchange rates. Exchange differences arising 
on translation are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on
foreign currency transactions are recorded directly to the statement of income. 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, the changes in fair 

values of derivative instruments designated as hedges of future cash flows related to interest rate variability and foreign currency 
translation adjustments pertaining to the net investment in foreign operations. Amounts are recognized net of tax to the extent
applicable. 

50

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

2.    Supplemental Cash Flow Information 

Interest paid 
Income taxes paid 

Significant Non-cash Transactions 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$
$

28,230   $
13,672   $

47,120  $
31,000  $

43,947 
17,642 

There were no significant non-cash transactions during 2008 and 2009. 

During 2007, the Company entered into a software licensing agreement that has been capitalized. The agreement requires 

monthly payments over three years in return for the right to use certain software applications in perpetuity. The net present value of 
the monthly payments was $2,872 at the time the agreement was entered into. 

3.    Business Acquisitions 

Acquisition of TelaPoint, Inc.  In August 2007, the Company acquired the stock of TelaPoint, Inc. ("TelaPoint") for 

approximately $40,000 cash. The Company purchased TelaPoint in order to take advantage of its browser-based supply chain software
solutions for bulk petroleum distributors and retailers. 

The following is a reconciliation of the cost of TelaPoint with the net assets acquired and the ultimate allocation to goodwill:

Consideration paid (including acquisition costs and net of cash acquired) 
Less:
  Net liabilities assumed 
  Acquired software 
  Customer relationships 
  Trademarks 

Recorded goodwill 

$

40,806 

(649)
9,000 
10,000 
600 

$

21,855 

Acquisition of Pacific Pride Services, Inc.  In February 2008, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain 
liabilities of Pacific Pride Services, Inc. and established Pacific Pride Services, LLC ("Pacific Pride") for approximately $32,000 cash. 
At the time of purchase, Pacific Pride's franchise network encompassed more than three-hundred forty independent fuel franchisees 
who issued their own Pacific Pride commercial fueling cards to fleet customers. These cards provide access to fuel at more than two 
thousand Pacific Pride and strategic partner locations in the United States and Canada. 

51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following is a reconciliation of the cost of the net assets acquired from Pacific Pride Services, Inc. and the ultimate 

allocation to goodwill: 

Consideration paid (including acquisition costs and net of cash acquired) 
Less:
  Accounts receivable 
  Accounts payable 
  Other tangible assets, net 
  Acquired software
  Non-compete agreement
  Customer relationships
  Trademarks and trade names 

Recorded goodwill 

$

31,540 

39,396 
(42,341)
148 
300 
100 
13,400 
1,400 

$

19,137 

Acquisition of Financial Automation Limited.  In August 2008, the Company acquired certain assets of Financial Automation 
Limited for approximately $9,250 cash and established Wright Express New Zealand ("Wright Express New Zealand") to operate the 
business of Financial Automation Limited. 

Financial Automation Limited provides fuel card processing software solutions to oil companies in geographic markets outside 

the United States.

The following is a reconciliation of the cost of the assets acquired from Financial Automation Limited and the ultimate 

allocation to goodwill: 

Consideration paid (including acquisition costs and net of cash acquired) 
Less:
  Tangible assets, net 
  Acquired software
  Customer relationship
  Trade name

Recorded goodwill 

$

10,073 

96 
7,000 
1,500 
100 

$

1,377 

The operations for each of these acquisitions are reported within the results of the Company's fleet segment from the 

acquisition date. 

Significant goodwill amounts are present in both the TelaPoint and Pacific Pride acquisitions based on the Company's belief that

the business models and practices followed by these entities were sufficiently distinct to warrant the payment of a purchase price
premium. 

No pro forma information has been included in these financial statements as the results of operations of TelaPoint, Pacific Pride
and Financial Automation Limited for the periods that they were not part of the Company, are immaterial to the Company's revenues, 
net income or earnings per share. 

52

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

4.    Reserves for Credit Losses 

The following table presents changes in reserves for credit losses related to accounts receivable: 

Balance, beginning of period 
Provision for credit losses 
Charge-offs 
Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off 

Balance, end of period 

5.    Investments 

Available-for-sale Securities 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

18,435  $
17,715 
(32,519) 
7,329 

9,466  $

45,021 
(42,625)
6,573 

9,749 
20,569 
(25,282)
4,430 

$

10,960  $

18,435  $

9,466 

The Company's available-for-sale securities as of December 31 are presented below: 

2009
  Mortgage-backed securities 
  Asset-backed securities 
  Municipal bonds 

Equity securities (a)

Gross 
Unrealized
Gains 

Gross 
Unrealized
Losses

Cost 

Fair Value 

  $

2,843   $
3,176  
365  
4,176  

61   $ 
—  
—  
36  

18   $
43  
—  
—  

2,886  
3,133  
365  
4,212  

  Total available-for-sale securities 

  $

10,560   $

97   $ 

61   $

10,596  

2008
  Mortgage-backed securities 
  Asset-backed securities 
  Municipal bonds 

Equity securities (a)

  $

4,232   $
3,956  
390  
4,038  

38   $ 
—  
2  
3  

33   $
82  
—  
11  

4,237  
3,874  
392  
4,030  

  Total available-for-sale securities 

  $

12,616   $

43   $ 

126   $

12,533  

(a)  These securities exclude $1,593 in equity securities designated as trading as of December 31, 2009, and $1,401 as of December 31, 2008, 

included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 16 for additional information about the securities designated as trading. 

The Company's management has determined that the gross unrealized losses on its investment securities at December 31, 2009, 

are temporary in nature. The Company reviews its investments to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible 
impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time and extent to which fair value
has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and the Company's intent and ability 
to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Substantially all of the 
Company's fixed income securities are rated investment grade or better. 

The Company had maturities of $2,194 of available-for-sale securities for the year ended December 31, 2009, $1,255 of 

available-for-sale securities for the year ended December 31, 2008, and $1,123 of available-for-sale securities for the year ended 
December 31, 2007. 

53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The maturity dates of the Company's available-for-sale securities are as follows: 

Due within 1 year 
Due after 1 year through year 5 
Due after 5 years through year 10 
Due after 10 years 
Mortgage backed securities with original maturities of 30 years 
Equity securities with no maturity dates 

Total 

(cid:3)

December 31, 

2009

2008

Cost 

Fair Value 

Cost 

Fair Value 

  $

—   $
—  
2,150  
1,391  
2,843  
4,176  

$ 

—  
—  
2,130  
1,368  
2,886  
4,212  

—   $

—  

—  
2,878  
1,468  
4,232  
4,038  

—  
2,834  
1,432  
4,237  
4,030  

  $

10,560   $

10,596   $ 

12,616   $

12,533  

6.    Property, Equipment and Capitalized Software, Net 

Property, equipment and capitalized software, net consist of the following: 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment 
Computer software 
Software under development 
Leasehold improvements 

Total 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 

December 31, 

2009 

2008

$

15,073  $
98,764 
2,649 
1,460 

13,131 
81,666 
6,467 
1,414 

117,946 
(72,955)

102,678 
(57,814)

Total property, equipment and capitalized software, net 

  $

44,991  $

44,864 

The Company incurred $814 of impairment charges during 2009 and $1,538 during 2008 related to partially completed 

internal-use software. These charges have been included in occupancy and equipment expense on the consolidated statements of 
income. 

7.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets 

The changes in goodwill during the period January 1 to December 31, 2009 were as follows: 

Goodwill, beginning of period 

Impact of foreign currency translation 

Goodwill, end of period 

Fleet
Segment

  MasterCard 
Segment

Total

$

$

305,517   $ 

(3 ) 

9,713   $
—  

315,230

(3 )

305,514   $ 

9,713   $

315,227

54

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The changes in goodwill during the period January 1 to December 31, 2008 were as follows: 

Goodwill, beginning of period 
  Adjustment to allocation of purchase price for TelaPoint acquisition 
  Acquisition of Pacific Pride 
  Acquisition of FAL 

Goodwill, end of period 

Fleet
Segment

  MasterCard 
Segment

$

284,652   $ 
351  
19,137  
1,377  

9,713   $
—  
—  
—  

Total

294,365
351
19,137
1,377

$

305,517   $ 

9,713   $

315,230

During 2008 and 2009, no goodwill was written off due to impairment. 

The changes in intangible assets during the period January 1 to December 31, 2009, were as follows: 

Definite-lived intangible assets 
  Acquired software 
  Non-compete agreement 
  Customer relationships 
  Trade name

Indefinite-lived intangible assets 
  Trademarks and trade names
Total 

Net Carrying 
Amount,
Beginning of 
Period 

Amortizations 

Impacts of 
Foreign
Currency 
Translation

Net Carrying 
Amount, 
End of 
Period

  $

15,085  $
17 
20,267 
88 

(1,520)  $
(17) 
(3,494) 
(34) 

—  $
— 
(42) 
— 

13,565 
—
16,731
54

  $

4,465 
39,922  $

— 
(5,065)  $

— 
(42)  $

4,465
34,815 

The Company expects amortization expense related to the definite-lived intangible assets above as follows:   $5,431 for 2010; 

$4,710 for 2011; $4,075 for 2012; $3,459 for 2013 and $2,841 for 2014. 

Other intangible assets consist of the following: 

Definite-lived intangible assets 
  Acquired software 
  Non-compete agreement 
  Customer relationships 
  Trade name

Indefinite-lived intangible assets 
  Trademarks and trade names

December 31, 2009 

December 31, 2008 

Gross
Carrying 
Amount 

Accumulated 
Amortization

Net Carrying 
Amount 

Gross 
Carrying 
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net Carrying 
Amount

$

16,300  $
100 
24,858 
100 

(2,735)  $
(100) 
(8,127) 
(46) 

13,565  $
— 
16,731 
54 

16,300  $
100 
24,900 
100 

(1,215)  $
(83) 
(4,633) 
(12) 

15,085 
17 
20,267 
88 

$

41,358  $

(11,008) 

30,350  $

41,400  $

(5,943) 

35,457 

4,465 

4,465 

Total 

  $

34,815 

  $

39,922 

55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

8.    Accounts Payable 

Accounts payable consist of: 

Merchants payable
Other payables 

Total accounts payable 

9.    Deposits and Borrowed Federal Funds 

The following table presents information about deposits: 

Certificates of deposit with maturities within 1 year 
Certificates of deposit with maturities greater than 1 year and less than 5 years 
Non-interest bearing deposits 

Total deposits 

December 31, 

2009 

2008

$ 

271,307   $
11,842  

239,899  
9,168  

$ 

283,149   $

249,067  

December 31, 

2009 

2008

   $ 

308,266   $
106,730  
8,291  

507,370  
24,646  
8,130  

$ 

423,287   $

540,146  

Weighted average cost of funds on certificates of deposit outstanding 

1.25 %

3.85 %

Wright Express Financial Services Corporation ("FSC") issues certificates of deposit in various maturities ranging between 
three months and two years and with fixed interest rates ranging from 0.35 percent to 4.00 percent as of December 31, 2009. FSC may 
issue certificates of deposit without limitation on the balance outstanding. However, FSC must maintain minimum financial ratios, 
which include risk-based asset and capital requirements, as prescribed by the FDIC. As of December 31, 2009, certificates of deposit 
were in denominations of $250 or less, corresponding to the increase in the FDIC insurance limits to $250 as authorized by the 
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The certificates of deposit are only payable prior to maturity in the case of death or 
legally declared mental incompetence of the holder. 

Non-interest bearing deposits are required for certain customers as collateral for their credit accounts. 

The Company had federal funds lines-of-credit totaling $155,000 at December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008. There was 
$71,723 in outstanding borrowings against these lines-of-credit at December 31, 2009 and none at December 31, 2008. The average
rate on the outstanding borrowings under lines-of-credit was 0.35 percent at December 31, 2009. 

The following table presents the average interest rates for deposits and borrowed federal funds: 

Average interest rate: 
  Deposits 
  Borrowed federal funds 

Average debt balance 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

2.39 %   
0.42 %   

4.42 %
2.44 %

5.27 %
5.29 %

$

434,529   $

664,646  $

544,674 

56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

10.  Derivative Instruments 

Fuel Price Derivatives 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 

For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in 
current earnings. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had the following put and call option contracts which settle on a monthly
basis:

Fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 
  Put and call option contracts settling January 2010 – June 2011 

Fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 
  Put and call option contracts settling January 2010 – June 2011 

Total fuel price derivative instruments 

Aggregate
Notional 
Amount 
(gallons) (a)

29,781 

13,380 

43,161 

(a)  The settlement of the put and call option contracts (in all instances, notional amount of puts and calls  are equal; strike prices are different) is based 
upon the New York Mercantile Exchange's New York Harbor Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen Blending and the U.S. Department of 
Energy's weekly retail on-highway diesel fuel price for the month. 

Interest Rate Swaps 

In July 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap arrangement for $50 million. This interest rate swap arrangement 

was designated as a cash flow hedge intended to reduce a portion of the variability of the future interest payments on our credit
agreement. Two of the Company's previous interest rate swap agreements totaling $80 million expired on July 22, 2009. The Company’s $25 
million interest rate swap expired on August 24, 2009. 

The following table presents information about the Company’s interest rate swap arrangements: 

July 2007 Swaps 
August 2007 Swap 
July 2009 Swap 

Total 

December 31, 

2009

Weighted-
Average 
Base Rate 

Aggregate 
Notional 

Fair Value 

Weighted-
Average
Base Rate 

2008

Aggregate
Notional 

Fair Value 

—%  $
—% 
1.35% 

—  $
— 
50,000 

$

50,000  $

— 
— 
278 

278 

5.20%  $
4.73% 
— 

80,000  $
25,000 
— 

(2,048) 
(694) 
— 

$

105,000  $

(2,742) 

57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table presents information on the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the condensed consolidated 

balance sheets: 

Asset Derivatives 

Liability Derivatives 

December 31, 2009 
Balance 
Sheet
Location 

Fair
Value

December 31, 2008 
Balance 
Sheet
Location 

Fair
Value

December 31, 2009 
Balance 
Sheet
Location 

Fair
Value

December 31, 2008 
Balance 
Sheet
Location 

Fair
Value

Derivatives designated as  
hedging instruments 

Interest rate contracts 

Other assets 

$

— Other assets 

$

—

  Accrued 
expenses

$

278

  Accrued 
expenses

$ 2,742

Derivatives not designated   
as hedging instruments   

Commodity contracts 

  Fuel price 
derivatives,
at fair value 

  Fuel price 
derivatives,
at fair value 

6,152

  Fuel price 
derivatives,
at fair value 

49,294

  Fuel price 
derivatives,
at fair value 

—

—

Total derivatives 

  $ 6,152 

  $ 49,294 

  $

278 

  $ 2,742 

The following table presents information on the location and amounts of derivative gains and losses in the condensed 

consolidated statements of income: 

Derivatives  
Designated as 
Hedging Instruments 

Amount of Gain or 
(Loss) Recognized in 
OCI on Derivative 
(Effective Portion) (a)

For the period ended 
December 31, 
2008

2009

Location of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income 
(Effective Portion) 

Amount of Gain 
or (Loss) 
Reclassified 
from
Accumulated 
OCI into 
Income 
(Effective 
Portion)

For the period ended
December 31, 
2008

2009

Location of Gain or 
(Loss) Recognized in 
Income on Derivative 
(Ineffective Portion 
and Amount Excluded 
from Effectiveness 
Testing) (b)

Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
(Ineffective Portion 
and Amount 
Excluded from 
Effectiveness 
Testing)(b)
For the period ended
December 31, 
2008

2009

Interest rate contracts 

$ 1,560

$

(319)

expense

$ (3,223)  $ (2,240) 

expense

$

— $

—

  Financing interest 

  Financing interest 

Derivatives Not 
Designated as 
Hedging Instruments 

Commodity contracts 

Location of Gain or 
(Loss) Recognized in 
Income on Derivative 

  Net realized and 

unrealized (losses) 
gains on fuel price 
derivatives

Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
For the period ended
December 31, 
2008

2009

$ (22,542)  $ 55,206 

(a)  The amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on the Company's interest rate swap arrangements has been recorded net of tax impacts of $904 in 

2009 and $(208) in 2008.  

(b)  No ineffectiveness was reclassified into earnings nor was any amount excluded from effectiveness testing. 

58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The Company uses derivative instruments to manage the impact of volatility in fuel prices. The Company enters into put and 
call option contracts ("Options") based on the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline and retail price of diesel fuel, which settle on a 
monthly basis through the second quarter of 2011. The Options are intended to lock in a range of prices during any given quarter on a 
portion of the Company's forecasted earnings subject to fuel price variations. The Company's fuel price risk management program is 
designed to purchase derivative instruments to manage its fuel price-related earnings exposure. The fair value of these instruments is 
recorded in fuel price derivative instruments, at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. 

The following table presents information about the Options: 

December 31, 

2009 

2008 

Put Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Call Option 
Strike Price 
of Underlying
(per gallon) (a)

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons) (b)

Fair Value 

Aggregate
Notional
(gallons) 

Fair Value 

Fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 
  Options settling October 2010 – June 2011 
  Options settling July 2010 – March 2011 
  Options settling April 2010 – December 2010 
  Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
  Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
  Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
  Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
  Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
  Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
  Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

2.013   $
1.953   $
1.906   $
2.860   $
2.430   $
2.443   $
2.040   $
1.970   $
1.850   $
1.733   $

2.073  
2.013  
1.966  
2.920  
2.490  
2.503  
2.100  
2.030  
1.910  
1.793  

5,836  
6,209  
4,642  
5,219  
5,302  
2,573  
—  
—  
—  
—  

(578 ) 
(754 ) 
(776 ) 
3,349  
1,418  
852  
—  
—  
—  
—  

—  
—  
—  
5,219  
7,860  
7,688  
7,822  
7,674  
4,831  
2,581  

—  
—  
—  
7,000  
7,938  
8,463  
5,687  
5,512  
3,097  
1,637  

  Total fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel 

29,781  

3,511  

43,675  

39,334  

Fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 

  Options settling October 2010 – June 2011 
  Options settling July 2010 – March 2011 
  Options settling April 2010 – December 2010 
  Options settling January 2010 – September 2010 
  Options settling October 2009 – June 2010 
  Options settling July 2009 – March 2010 
  Options settling April 2009 – December 2009 
  Options settling January 2009 – September 2009 
  Options settling October 2008 – June 2009 
  Options settling July 2008 – March 2009 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

3.000   $
3.000   $
2.936   $
4.040   $
3.515   $
3.500   $
2.975   $
2.870   $
2.865   $
2.753   $

3.060  
3.060  
2.996  
4.100  
3.575  
3.560  
3.035  
2.930  
2.925  
2.813  

2,622  
2,790  
2,085  
2,345  
2,382  
1,156  
—  
—  
—  
—  

(437 ) 
(342 ) 
(292 ) 
2,186  
1,034  
492  
—  
—  
—  
—  

—  
—  
—  
2,345  
3,531  
3,454  
3,514  
3,448  
2,170  
1,160  

—  
—  
—  
2,561  
2,311  
2,391  
987  
863  
611  
236  

  Total fuel price derivative instruments – diesel 

13,380  

2,641  

19,622  

9,960  

Total fuel price derivative instruments 

43,161  

6,152  

63,297  

49,294  

(a)  The settlement of the Options is based upon the New York Mercantile Exchange's New York Harbor Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen 

Blending and the U.S. Department of Energy's weekly retail on-highway diesel fuel price for the month. 

(b)  The Options settle on a monthly basis. 

59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the fuel price derivatives which have been recorded in net realized

and unrealized losses on derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of income: 

Realized gains (losses) 
Unrealized (losses) gains 

Net realized and unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments 

11.  Financing Debt 

Revolving Credit Facility 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

$

20,600  $
(43,142) 

(35,686) $
90,892 

(16,536)
(37,074)

(22,542)  $

55,206  $

(53,610)

On May 22, 2007, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility (the "2007 Revolver") with a lending syndicate. The 

2007 Revolver initially provided for a five-year $350,000 unsecured revolving line-of-credit. In connection with the 2007 Revolver, 
the Company paid loan origination fees of $998. These fees have been recorded as other assets on the consolidated balance sheet and 
are being amortized on a straight-line basis (which approximates the effective interest rate method) over the term of the 2007 
Revolver. On May 29, 2008, the Company entered into an incremental amendment agreement (the "Incremental Amendment 
Agreement") of the 2007 Revolver to increase the aggregate unsecured revolving line-of-credit from $350,000 to $450,000. The 
Company incurred $1,556 in loan origination fees in conjunction with entering into the Incremental Amendment Agreement. These 
fees have been recorded as other assets on the consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2007 
Revolver. All other provisions of the 2007 Revolver remain unchanged. 

Amounts outstanding under the 2007 Revolver bear interest at a rate equal to (a) the British Bankers Association LIBOR plus a 

margin of 0.45 percent to 1.125 percent based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio or (b) the higher of the Federal Funds
Rate plus 0.50 percent or the prime rate announced by Bank of America, N.A., plus a margin of up to 0.125 percent based on the 
Company's consolidated leverage ratio. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate per annum
ranging from 0.10 percent to 0.20 percent of the daily unused portion of the 2007 Revolver. The Company also has a letter of credit 
associated with the 2007 Revolver. The letter of credit reduces the amount available for borrowings and may collateralize certain of 
the Company's derivative instruments. The Company is assessed a fee on the liquidation value of the letter of credit. This fee was 
0.125 percent at December 31, 2009, and 0.575 percent at December 31, 2008. The balance under the letter of credit was $2,100 at
December 31, 2009. The balance of the letter of credit was $1 at December 31, 2008. Any outstanding loans under the 2007 Revolver
mature on May 22, 2012, unless extended pursuant to the terms of the 2007 Revolver. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had 
approximately $319,900 available under this facility. 

Proceeds from the 2007 Revolver were used to refinance the Company's indebtedness under an existing credit facility which 
consisted of a revolving line-of-credit facility (the "2005 Revolver") and a term loan (the "Term Loan"). All balances owed by the 
Company, which included $20,000 on the 2005 Revolver and $131,000 on the Term Loan were paid at this time. In 2007, the 
Company expensed $1,572 of unamortized loan origination fees in conjunction with the termination of the 2005 Revolver and the 
Term Loan. This charge has been recorded on the consolidated statement of income as loss on extinguishment of debt. 

60

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table presents information about the 2007 Revolver: 

Outstanding balance on revolving line-of-credit with interest based on LIBOR 
Outstanding balance on revolving line-of-credit with interest based on the prime rate 

Total outstanding balance on revolving line-of-credit facility 

Weighted average rate based on LIBOR (including impact of interest rate swaps) 
Rate based on the prime rate 

Financing Interest 

The following table presents the components of financing interest expense: 

2007 Revolver: 

Interest expense based on LIBOR 
Interest expense based on the prime rate 

  Fees 
  Amortization of loan origination fees 

2005 Revolver: 

Interest expense based on LIBOR 
Interest expense based on the prime rate 

  Fees 
  Amortization of loan origination fees 

Term Loan: 

Interest expense based on LIBOR 
  Amortization of loan origination fees 

Realized losses (gains) on interest rate swaps (Note 10) 

Dividends on preferred stock (Note 13) 

Other

December 31, 

2009 

2008

   $ 

120,000   $
8,000  

155,000  
15,600  

   $ 

128,000   $

170,600  

1.26 %
3.25 %

3.78 %
3.25 %

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

1,444   $ 

219
422
628

7,793   $
261  
508  
465  

6,584  
340  
162  
144  

2,713

9,027  

7,230  

—
—
—
—

—

—
—

—

—  
—  
—  
—  

—  

—  
—  

—  

3,223

2,240

248

26

474

118

746  
199  
145  
134  

1,224  

3,379  
423  

3,802  

(414 )

700  

135  

Total financing interest expense 

$

6,210   $ 

11,859   $

12,677  

Average interest rate (including impact of interest rate swaps): 
  Based on LIBOR 
  Based on prime 

Average debt balance at LIBOR 
Average debt balance at prime 

2.95 %  
3.26 %  

4.54 %
5.01 %

6.07 %
8.09 %

$
$

158,268   $ 
6,729   $ 

221,044   $
5,210   $

169,671  
6,660  

61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Debt Covenants 

The 2007 Revolver contains various financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. In addition,
the 2007 Revolver contains various customary restrictive covenants that limit the Company's ability to pay dividends, sell or transfer 
all or substantially all of its property or assets, incur more indebtedness or make guarantees, grant or incur liens on its assets, make 
investments, loans, advances or acquisitions, engage in mergers, consolidations, liquidations or dissolutions, enter into sales or 
leasebacks or change its accounting policies or reporting practices. FSC is not subject to certain of these restrictions. 

12.  Related Parties 

During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company utilized legal services in the normal course of business from a law firm where the 

spouse of one of the Company's officers is a principal. Amounts paid to this law firm in connection with services provided were
approximately $14 during 2009, $108 during 2008 and $74 during 2007. 

13.  Preferred Stock 

There were 0.1 shares of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 

2009 and 2008, with a par value of $0.01 per share and a purchase price per share and liquidation value per share of $100,000. The 
discussion below highlights the features of the preferred stock. Given these features, the Company has treated the preferred stock as a 
liability. Accordingly, dividends are recorded as interest expense on the consolidated statements of income. 

Voting rights.    Except in the limited circumstances described below and to the extent required by the Delaware General 
Corporation Law, the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock has no voting power with respect to the election of 
directors or any other stockholder matters. Consent of the holders of at least 50 percent of the outstanding Series A non-voting
convertible, redeemable preferred stock, voting as a separate class, is required to  (i) increase the authorized number of shares of 
Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, or  (ii) amend or repeal the Company's certificate of incorporation in a 
manner that adversely affects the rights, preferences or privileges granted to the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred 
stock.

Dividends.    The holder of each share of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock is entitled to receive, out 

of funds legally available, cumulative cash dividends at a floating rate equal to the three-month LIBOR, plus 150 basis points,
multiplied by $100,000 per share of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, per annum, payable on a 
quarterly basis commencing on June 15, 2005, in preference to any dividends paid on the Company's common stock. If the Company 
fails to pay these dividends for two quarterly periods, the dividend rate will increase by 50 basis points until all dividends in arrears 
have been paid. Dividends on the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock accrue whether or not the Company has 
earnings, whether or not the Company has funds legally available for the payment of such dividends and whether or not the Company
declares such dividends. At December 31, 2009, the cash dividend rate was 1.79 percent, at December 31, 2008, this rate was 
3.37 percent and at December 31, 2007, this rate was 6.44 percent. The Company recorded interest expense of $248 related to these
dividends for the year ended December 31, 2009, $474 for the year ended December 31, 2008, and $700 for the year ended 
December 31, 2007. These dividends have been recorded as financing interest expense on the consolidated statements of income. 

Liquidation preference.    In the event of the Company's liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of the Series A non-
voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock are entitled to receive a liquidation preference of an amount per share of Series A non-
voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock equal to the sum of  (i) $100,000 per share of the Company's Series A non-voting
convertible, redeemable preferred stock, plus  (ii) accrued but unpaid dividends. The liquidation preference will be adjusted for 
combinations, consolidations, subdivisions or splits of the Company's Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock. A 
merger, acquisition or sale of all or substantially all of the Company's and its subsidiaries' assets, in each case, in which the holders of 
the Company's common stock immediately prior to such transaction hold less than 50 percent of the voting power of the surviving or 
purchasing entity is treated as a liquidation of the Company for these purposes. After payment in full to creditors, if the Company's 
assets are insufficient to pay the liquidation preference to the holders of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred 
stock, all of the Company's assets will be distributed ratably among the holders of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable
preferred stock, based upon the total liquidation preference due each holder. After payment of the liquidation preference to the holders 
of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, the Company's remaining assets will be distributed to the holders 
of the Company's common stock. 

62

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Conversion.    Each share of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock may, in certain limited circumstances, 

at the option of the holder, be converted into a number of shares of common stock equal to the liquidation preference divided by the 
then applicable conversion price. In addition, in the event of certain mergers, acquisitions or sales of assets, each holder will have the 
right to receive a make-whole premium. The initial per share conversion price is $22.50 per share and is subject to anti-dilution 
adjustments. Conversion rights may only be exercised  (i) after five years from the date of issuance, February 14, 2005, of the Series A 
non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock and only if the Company indicates its intention to redeem or  (ii) immediately prior 
to a merger, acquisition or sale of all or substantially all of the Company and its subsidiaries' assets. 

Redemption rights.    At any time after five years from the date of issuance, February 14, 2005, of the Series A non-voting 
convertible, redeemable preferred stock, the Company may redeem, in whole or in part, the outstanding shares of Series A non-voting
convertible, redeemable preferred stock for $100,000 per share in cash or shares of common stock equal to 101 percent of the 
liquidation preference on the redemption date. On the five and one-half year anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series A non-
voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock and on each anniversary thereafter, each holder may require the Company to redeem
their shares of Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock for $100,000 per share in cash equal to the liquidation 
preference on the redemption date. At the Company's option, shares of the Company's common stock having the fair market value of
the redemption price – see "Liquidation preference" above may be used to satisfy the redemption request. After 10 years from the date 
of issuance of the Series A non-voting convertible, redeemable preferred stock, all of the outstanding shares of Series A non-voting 
convertible, redeemable preferred stock must be redeemed for a price per share in cash equal to the liquidation preference on the
redemption date. 

14.  Income Taxes 

Income before income taxes consisted of the following: 

United States 
Foreign

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

$

228,841   $ 
(3,597 ) 

196,329   $
(564 )

163,133  
4  

225,244   $ 

195,765   $

163,137  

Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations consisted of the following for the years ended December 31: 

2009
  Current 
  Deferred 

2008 
  Current 
  Deferred 

2007 
  Current 
  Deferred 

United States

State
and Local 

Foreign 

Total 

  $
  $

  $
  $

  $
  $

22,947  $
55,646  $

2,911  $
3,973  $

172  $
(64)  $

26,030 
59,555 

22,896  $
47,302  $

3,245  $
(5,231)  $

11  $
(98)  $

26,152 
41,973 

15,076  $
13,470  $

1,485  $
81,528  $

1  $
—  $

16,562 
94,998 

63

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The reconciliation between the income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and the reported effective tax 

rate on income from continuing operations is as follows: 

Federal statutory rate 
  State income taxes (net of federal income tax benefit) and foreign income tax 
  Revaluation of deferred tax assets for tax rate changes and blending differences, net 
  Dividend exclusion 
  Other 

Effective tax rate 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

35.0 % 
3.4
(0.1)
—
(0.3)

35.0 % 
1.9 
(2.7) 
0.1 
0.5 

35.0 % 
1.4 
32.0 
0.1 
(0.1) 

38.0 % 

34.8 % 

68.4 % 

On June 7, 2007, the State of Maine enacted a law effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2007, which changed 

the State's rules for apportioning income related to the performance of services. The new law effectively reduced taxable income or 
loss allocable to the State of Maine. This caused a reduction in the Company's blended state income tax rate. The effect of this lower 
state income tax rate on the temporary differences decreased the Company's deferred tax assets which resulted in a charge to the
provision for income taxes for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, of $80,879. 

The tax effects of temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for tax and financial reporting purposes that

give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities are presented below: 

Deferred assets related to: 
  Reserve for credit losses 
  Stock-based compensation, net 
  State net operating loss carry forwards 
  Other assets 
  Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps and available-for-sale securities, net 
  Tax deductible intangibles, primarily goodwill, net

Deferred tax liabilities related to: 
  Other assets 
  Property, equipment and capitalized software 
  Derivatives 

  Valuation allowance on state net operating loss carry forwards 

December 31, 

2009 

2008

$ 

4,078   $
3,790  
973  
2,394  
89  
183,632  

6,927
2,880
1,041
—
1,035
260,367

194,956  

272,250

—  
8,875  
2,259  

1,454
8,564
22,117

11,134  

32,135

220  

158  

Deferred income taxes, net

$ 

183,602   $

239,957

The deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are included in deferred income taxes, net on the consolidated balance sheet.

64

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The Company had approximately $302,819 of state and $57 of foreign net operating loss carry forwards at December 31, 2009 

and approximately $289,920 of state and $385 of foreign net operating loss carry forwards at December 31, 2008. These expire at
various times through 2028. Valuation allowances have been established for those state net operating losses that the Company believes 
it is more likely than not that they will not be utilized within the carry forward period. 

Deferred income taxes have not been provided for the undistributed (deficit) earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, 

which aggregated to approximately $(4,266) at December 31, 2009, and $(477) at December 31, 2008. The Company plans to reinvest
any earnings for future expansion in the respective foreign jurisdictions. A portion of the undistributed earnings will be subject to U.S. 
taxation upon repatriation as dividends to the U.S. parent. The amount of taxes attributable to these undistributed earnings is not 
practicably determinable. 

In 2009 the Company (i) received additional information from Avis relative to basis differences at the time of the initial public

offering; and (ii) corrected an improperly recorded basis difference.  This resulted in adjustments to additional paid in capital, the 
majority of which (approximately $6,500) were offset by credits to deferred taxes and taxes payable.  In 2008 the Company also 
corrected an improperly recorded basis difference arising from the Avis transaction.  The credit to additional paid in capital was offset 
by a charge to deferred taxes.  The Company determined that, due to the immateriality of the corrections, revisions to the prior year 
financial statements were not necessary. 

15.  Tax Receivable Agreement 

As a consequence of the Company’s separation from its former parent company, the tax basis of the Company’s net tangible 

and intangible assets increased (the “Tax Basis Increase”). The Tax Basis Increase reduced the amount of tax that the Company would 
pay in the future to the extent the Company generated taxable income in sufficient amounts. The Company was contractually 
obligated, pursuant to its 2005 Tax Receivable Agreement with the Company’s former parent company (Cendant Corporation), to 
remit 85 percent of any such cash savings. The estimated total payments owed to Cendant Corporation based on facts available at that 
time, was reflected as a liability titled “Amounts due under tax receivable agreement.”  

The amount of these estimated future payments is dependent upon future statutory tax rates and the Company’s ability to 

generate sufficient taxable income adequate to cover the tax depreciation, amortization and interest expense associated with the Tax 
Basis Increase. The Company regularly reviews its estimated blended tax rates and projections of future taxable earnings to determine 
whether changes in the estimated liability are required.  Any changes to the estimated future payments due to changes to estimated 
blended tax rates are recorded in the income statement as changes in amounts due under tax receivable agreement. 

In both 2009 and 2008 there has been reassessment of the blended tax rates that are projected into the future.  In 2009 and 2008,

the net future benefits increased, which increased the associated liability to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (“Wyndham”), 
resulting in a $599 and $9,014 charge to non-operating expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. 

Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of July 27, 2006, by and among Cendant Corporation (now 
known as Avis Budget Group, Inc. or “Avis”), Realogy Corporation (“Realogy”), Wyndham and Travelport Inc., Realogy acquired 
from Cendant the right to receive 62.5 percent of the payments by Wright Express to Cendant and Wyndham acquired from Cendant 
the right to receive 37.5 percent of the payments by Wright Express to Cendant under the 2005 Tax Receivable Agreement.  

On June 26, 2009, the Company entered into a Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement with Realogy, pursuant to which the 

Company paid Realogy $51,000, including bank fees and legal expenses, as prepayment in full to settle the remaining obligations to 
Realogy under the 2005 Tax Receivable Agreement. These obligations were previously recorded at $187,485 and this transaction 
resulted in a gain of $136,485 in the second quarter of 2009. In connection with the Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement with 
Realogy, the Company entered into a Ratification Agreement on June 26, 2009, (the “Ratification Agreement”) with Avis, Realogy 
and Wyndham which amended the 2005 Tax Receivable Agreement to require the Company to pay 31.875  (which is 85 percent of the 
original benefit of 37.5 percent) percent of the future tax savings related to the Tax Basis Increase to Wyndham.  

16.  Employee Benefit Plans 

The Company sponsors a 401(k) retirement and savings plan. The Company's employees who are at least 18 years of age, have 

worked at least 1,000 hours in the past year, and have completed one year of service are eligible to participate in this plan. The 

65

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Company matches 100 percent of each employee's contributions up to a maximum of 6 percent of each employee's eligible 
compensation. All contributions vest immediately. Wright Express has the right to discontinue this plan at any time. Contributions to 
the plan are voluntary. The Company contributed $1,740 for the year ended December 31, 2009, $1,860 for the year ended 
December 31, 2008, and $1,652 for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

The Company also sponsors a defined contribution plan for certain employees designated by the Company. Participants may 

elect to defer receipt of designated percentages or amounts of their compensation. The Company maintains a grantor's trust to hold the 
assets under the Company's defined contribution plan. The obligation related to the defined contribution plan totaled $1,593 at
December 31, 2009, and $1,401 at December 31, 2008. These amounts are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance
sheet. The assets held in trust are designated as trading securities and, as such, these trading securities are to be recorded at fair value 
with any changes recorded currently to earnings. The aggregate market value of the securities with the trust was $1,593 at 
December 31, 2009, and $1,401 at December 31, 2008. Such amounts are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

17.  Fair Value 

The Company holds mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, fixed income and equity securities, derivatives and 

certain other financial instruments which are carried at fair value. The Company determines fair value based upon quoted prices when 
available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as model pricing, when market quotes are not readily accessible or
available. The Company carries certain of its liabilities at fair value, including its derivative liabilities. In determining the fair value of 
the Company's obligations, various factors are considered including:  closing exchange or over-the-counter market price quotations; 
time value and volatility factors underlying options and derivatives; price activity for equivalent instruments; the Company's own-
credit standing; and counterparty credit risk. 

These valuation techniques may be based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data 

obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs
create the following fair value hierarchy: 

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

(cid:2)

Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. 

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in 
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value 
drivers are observable. 

Level 3 – Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable. 

66

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table presents the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value and the related hierarchy levels

for 2009: 

Fair Value Measurements 
at Reporting Date Using 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) 

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for 
Identical Assets 
(Level 1) 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) 

December 31,
2009

Assets: 

Mortgage-backed securities 
Asset-backed securities 
Municipal bonds 
Equity securities 

  $

2,886   $
3,133  
365  
4,212  

—   $ 
—  
—  
4,212  

2,886   $
3,133  
365  
—  

  Total available-for-sale securities 

  $

10,596   $

4,212   $ 

6,384   $

Executive deferred compensation plan trust (a)

Fuel price derivatives – diesel 
Fuel price derivatives – unleaded fuel 

  $

  $

1,593   $

1,593   $ 

—   $

2,641   $
3,511  

—   $ 
—  

—   $

3,511  

2,641  
—  

—  
—  
—  
—  

—  

—  

  Total fuel price derivatives

  $

6,152   $

—   $ 

3,511   $

2,641  

Liabilities: 

July 2009 interest rate swap arrangement with a 
  base rate of 1.35% and a notional amount of $50,000 

278  

—  

278  

Total interest rate swap arrangements (b) 

  $

278   $

—   $ 

278   $

—  

—  

(a)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in other assets. 
(b)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in accrued expenses. 

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets (liabilities) measured at fair value 

on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended December 31, 2009: 

Beginning balance 
  Total gains or (losses) – realized/unrealized 

Included in earnings (a)
Included in other comprehensive income 

  Purchases, issuances and settlements 
  Transfers in/(out) of Level 3 

Ending balance 

Fuel Price 
Derivatives – 
Diesel

  $

9,960  

(7,319 ) 

—
—
—

  $

2,641  

(a)  Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009, are reported in net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price 

derivatives on the consolidated statements of income. 

67

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The following table presents the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value and the related hierarchy levels

for 2008: 

Fair Value Measurements 
at Reporting Date Using 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) 

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for 
Identical Assets 
(Level 1) 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) 

December 31,
2008

Assets: 

Mortgage-backed securities 
Asset-backed securities 
Municipal bonds 
Equity securities 

  $

4,237   $
3,874  
392  
4,030  

—   $ 
—  
—  
4,030  

4,237   $
3,874  
392  
—  

  Total available-for-sale securities 

  $

12,533   $

4,030   $ 

8,503   $

Executive deferred compensation plan trust (a)

Fuel price derivatives – diesel 
Fuel price derivatives – unleaded fuel 

  $

  $

1,401   $

1,401   $ 

—   $

9,960   $

39,334  

—   $ 
—  

—   $

39,334  

9,960  
—  

—  
—  
—  
—  

—  

—  

  Total fuel price derivatives

  $

49,294   $

—   $ 

39,334   $

9,960  

Liabilities: 

July 2007 interest rate swap arrangements with a base 
  rate of 5.20% and an aggregate notional amount of $80,000 
August 2007 interest rate swap arrangement with a 
  base rate of 4.73% and a notional amount of $25,000 

  $

2,048   $

—   $ 

2,048   $

694  

—  

694  

Total interest rate swap arrangements (b) 

  $

2,742   $

—   $ 

2,742   $

—  

—  

—  

(a)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in other assets. 
(b)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in accrued expenses. 

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets (liabilities) measured at fair value 

on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended December 31, 2008: 

Beginning balance 
  Total gains or (losses) – realized/unrealized 

Included in earnings (a)
Included in other comprehensive income 

  Purchases, issuances and settlements 
  Transfers in/(out) of Level 3 

Ending balance 

Fuel Price 
Derivatives – 
Diesel

  $

(14,037 ) 

23,997  
—
—
—

  $

9,960  

(a)  Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2008, are reported in net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price 

derivatives on the consolidated statements of income. 

68

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Available-for-sale securities and executive deferred compensation plan trust

When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of available-for-sale securities; such items 

are classified in Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy. These securities primarily consist of exchange-traded equity securities.

For mortgage-backed and asset-backed debt securities and bonds, the Company generally uses quoted prices for recent trading 

activity of assets with similar characteristics to the debt security or bond being valued. The securities and bonds priced using such 
methods are generally classified as Level 2. 

Fuel price derivatives and interest rate swap arrangements 

The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and so are valued using internal 
valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation technique and inputs depend on the type of 
derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument. The principal technique used to value these instruments is a comparison of the 
spot price of the underlying instrument to its related futures curve adjusted for the Company's assumptions of volatility and present 
value, where appropriate. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect the expected cash the Company will pay or receive upon
settlement of the respective contracts. 

The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield 

curves, the spot price of the underlying instrument, volatility, and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 
depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenures are generally less
observable. 

18.  Commitments and Contingencies 

Litigation 

The Company is involved in pending litigation in the usual course of business. In the opinion of management, such litigation 

will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 

Extension of Credit to Customers 

The Company had commitments aggregating approximately $2,818,000 at December 31, 2009, and $3,915,000 at 
December 31, 2008, related to payment processing services, primarily related to commitments to extend credit to customers and 
customers of strategic relationships as part of established lending product agreements. Many of these are not expected to be used;
therefore, total unused credit available to customers and customers of strategic relationships does not represent future cash 
requirements. The Company can increase or decrease its customers' credit lines at our discretion at any time. These amounts are not 
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet. 

Operating Leases 

The Company leases office space, equipment, and vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates 

through 2019. Two of the Company's office space lease agreements were renewed during 2006 and another agreement was renewed in 
2007. In addition, the Company rents office equipment under agreements that may be canceled at any time. Rental expense related to 
office space, equipment, and vehicle leases amounted to $3,420 for the year ended December 31, 2009, $3,569 for the year ended 
December 31, 2008, and $3,231 for the year ended December 31, 2007. These amounts were included in occupancy and equipment on 
the consolidated statements of income. The Company leases information technology hardware and software under agreements that 
may be terminated by the Company at any time. Lease expense related to information technology hardware and software leases totaled 
$2,627 for the year ended December 31, 2009, $2,625 for the year ended December 31, 2008, and $2,475 for the year ended 
December 31, 2007. These amounts were included in technology leasing and support on the consolidated statements of income. 

69

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows: 

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 and thereafter 

Total 

19.  Cash and Dividend Restrictions 

Cash 

Payment 

4,094 
3,331 
2,694 
1,805 
1,754 
6,158 

  $

19,836 

Federal Reserve Board regulations may require reserve balances on certain deposits to be maintained with the Federal Reserve 

Bank. No such reserves were required at December 31, 2009 or 2008. 

Dividends 

FSC is chartered under the laws of the State of Utah and the FDIC insures its deposits. Under Utah law, FSC may only pay a 

dividend out of undivided profits after it has  (i) provided for all expenses, losses, interest and taxes accrued or due from FSC
and (ii) transferred to a surplus fund 10 percent of its net profits before dividends for the period covered by the dividend, until the 
surplus reaches 100 percent of its capital stock. For purposes of these Utah dividend limitations, the FSC's capital stock is $5,250 and 
its capital surplus exceeds 100 percent of capital stock. 

Under FDIC regulations, FSC may not pay any dividend if, following the payment of the dividend, FSC would be 

"undercapitalized," as defined under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and applicable regulations. 

FSC complied with the aforementioned dividend restrictions for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. 

20.  Stock-Based Compensation 

The Company's 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which is stockholder-approved, permits the grant of share options, 

stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock- or cash-based awards to non-employee directors,
officers, employees, advisors or consultants for up to 3,200 shares of common stock. The Company believes that such awards increase 
efforts on behalf of the Company and promote the success of the Company's business. On December 31, 2009, the Company had four 
share-based compensation programs, which are described below. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for 
these programs totals $5,736 for 2009, $5,216 for 2008 and $4,508 for 2007. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income 
statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $2,180 for 2009, $1,815 for 2008 and $3,081 for 2007. 

Restricted Stock Units 

The Company awards restricted stock units ("RSUs") to non-employee directors and certain employees periodically under the 
Plan. An RSU is a right granted to receive stock at the end of a specified period. RSU awards generally vest evenly over a period of 
three or four years. The awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change of control (as defined in the Plan). The fair value of 
each RSU award is based on the closing market price of the Company's stock one business day prior to the grant date as reported by 
the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"). 

70

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

A summary of the status of the Company's RSUs as of December 31, 2009, and changes during the year then ended is presented 

below: 

Restricted Stock Units 
  Balance at January 1, 2009 
  Granted 
  Vested – shares issued 

Vested – shares deferred 

  Forfeited 

Withheld for taxes 

(b)

(a)

  Balance at December 31, 2009 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value 

Units

358   $
215   $
(141 )  $
(3 )  $
(6 )  $
(70 )  $

26.87  
15.25  
23.52  
32.01  
28.41  
22.86  

353   $

21.31  

(a) The Company issued fully vested and non-forfeitable restricted stock units to certain non-employee directors and certain employees that are 

payable in shares of the Company's common stock at a later date as specified by the award (deferred stock units or "DSUs"). 

(b) The Company has elected to pay cash equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld for income tax purposes instead of issuing the shares 

of common stock. The cash is remitted to the appropriate taxing authority and the shares are never issued. 

As of December 31, 2009, there was $6,836 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based 

compensation arrangements granted as RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. The 
total fair value of shares vested was $4,242 during 2009, $5,117 during 2008, and $7,931 during 2007. 

Deferred Stock Units 

Under the Plan, the Company also grants DSUs to non-employee directors and certain employees. A DSU is a fully vested right 

to receive stock at a certain point in time in the future. DSUs do not require any future service or performance obligations to be met. 
DSUs may be granted immediately or may initially be granted as RSUs which become DSUs once a previously determined service 
obligation has been met. The fair value of each granted DSU award is based on the closing market price of the Company's stock on the 
grant date as reported by the NYSE. 

A summary of the status of the Company's DSUs as of December 31, 2009, and changes during the year ended December 31, 

2009, is presented below: 

Deferred Stock Units 
  Balance at January 1, 2009 
  Granted as DSUs 
  Converted from RSUs 
  Converted to common shares 

Withheld for taxes 

(a)

  Balance at December 31, 2009 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value 

Units

80   $
7   $
3   $
(15 )  $
(6 )  $

22.55  
20.96  
32.01  
21.36  
21.36  

69   $

23.23  

(a) The Company has elected to pay cash equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld for income tax purposes instead of issuing the shares 

of common stock. The cash is remitted to the appropriate taxing authority and the shares are never issued. 

71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

There is no unrecognized compensation cost related to awards granted as, or converted to, DSUs. The Company has determined 

that the award was earned when granted and is expensed at that time. The total fair value of shares granted and vested was $228
during 2009, $242 during 2008, and $195 during 2007. 

Performance Based Restricted Stock Units 

The Company also awards performance based restricted stock units ("PBRSUs") to employees periodically under the Plan. A 

PBRSU is a right granted to receive stock at the end of a specified period. In a PBRSU, the number of shares earned varies based upon 
meeting certain corporate-wide performance goals, including revenue and earnings in excess of targets. PBRSU awards generally have 
performance goals tracking a one to four year period, depending on the nature of the performance goal. The fair value of each PBRSU
award is based on the closing market price of the Company's stock one business day prior to the grant date as reported by the NYSE. 

A summary of the status of certain of the Company's PBRSUs at threshold and target performance as of December 31, 2009, 

and changes during the year then ended is presented below: 

Performance Based Restricted Stock Units 
  Balance at January 1, 2009 
  Granted 
  Vested 
  Forfeited 

  Balance at December 31, 2009 

Units at 
Threshold 

Units at 
Target

Weighted-
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value 

45  
—  
—  
—  
(1 ) 

44  

91  

(3 ) 

88   $

35.45  

Management determined that the performance conditions, which expire at December 31, 2010, of this award are not probable of 

being met as of December 31, 2009. Accordingly, the Company has not recognized any compensation cost related to the PBRSU 
award above. The range of unrecognized compensation cost related to the award is from $1,554 at threshold, 50 percent below 
targeted performance, to $3,110 at target, 100 percent of targeted performance, as of December 31, 2009, depending whether certain
performance conditions are met. No portion of this award had vested as of December 31, 2009. 

In addition to the PBRSUs discussed above, the Company issued approximately 11 units through two separate awards with a 

value at targeted performance levels of $228 during 2008. The Company recognized $209 as compensation cost related to these 
awards in 2009.  

Stock Options 

On February 22, 2005, the Company granted options to purchase the Company's common stock to certain employees as part of 
its IPO. Employee stock options granted by the Company had terms ranging from one to seven years, were fully vested, with exercise
prices ranging from $5.72 to $14.98. 

On February 13, 2009, and on March 5, 2009, the Company approved the grant of stock options, to certain officers and 
employees under the Plan.  Stock options granted generally become exercisable over three years (with approximately 33 percent of the 
total grant vesting each year on the anniversary of the grant date) and expire 8 years from the date of grant.  

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model that uses 

the assumptions noted in the following table. The expected term of the options represents the period of time that options granted are 
expected to be outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from traded options on the Company's stock,
historical volatility of the Company's stock, and other factors. The risk-free interest rate for the period matching the expected term of 
the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The dividend yield is the calculated yield on the 
Company's stock at the time of the grant. 

72

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

The table below summarizes the assumptions used to calculate the fair value: 

Weighted average expected life (in years) 
Weighted average exercise price 
Weighted average volatility 
Weighted average risk-free rate 
Weighted average dividend yield 
Weighted average fair value 

The activity of the stock option plan related to the Company's employees consisted of: 

  February13,
2009

March 5, 
2009

  $

  $

4.75 
13.51  $
45.76%
1.70%
0.00%
5.50  $

5.00
13.60
46.06%
1.80%
0.00%
5.72

Stock Options 
  Outstanding at January 1, 2009 
  Granted 
  Exercised 
  Forfeited or expired 

Weighted-
Average 
Remaining 
Contractual 
Term (in 
years) 

Weighted-
Average 
Exercise
Price

Aggregate 
Intrinsic 
Value

Shares

87   $
630   $
(44 )  $
(7 )  $

13.42  
13.57  
9.92  
13.53  

  Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2009 

666   $

13.79  

7.26   $

12,037  

No stock options were awarded by the Company during the years 2008 and 2007. The total intrinsic value of options exercised 

during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $728 and $495 respectively. 

21.  Segment Information 

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is 
evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The 
Company's chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The operating segments are reviewed separately because
each operating segment represents a strategic business unit that generally offers different products and serves different markets.

The Company's chief operating decision maker evaluates the operating results of the Company's reportable segments based 

upon revenues and "adjusted net income," which is defined by the Company as net income adjusted for fair value changes of 
derivative instruments, the amortization of purchased intangibles, the net impact of tax rate changes on the Company’s deferred tax 
asset and related changes in the tax-receivable agreement, non-cash asset impairment charges and the gains on the extinguishment of a 
portion of the tax receivable agreement. These adjustments are reflected net of the tax impact. 

The Company operates in two reportable segments, Fleet and MasterCard. The Fleet segment provides customers with payment 

and transaction processing services specifically designed for the needs of vehicle fleet customers. This segment also provides 
information management services to these fleet customers. The MasterCard segment provides customers with a payment processing 
solution for their corporate purchasing and transaction monitoring needs. Revenue in this segment is derived from two product lines – 
corporate charge cards and single use accounts. The MasterCard products are used by businesses to facilitate purchases of products
and utilize the Company's information management capabilities. 

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are generally the same as those described in the summary of significant 

accounting policies. 

73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Financing interest expense and net realized and unrealized losses on derivative instruments are not allocated to the MasterCard

segment in the computation of segment results for internal evaluation purposes. Total assets are not allocated to the segments.

The following table presents the Company's reportable segment results for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007: 

Total 
Revenues

Operating 
Interest
Expense

Depreciation
and
Amortization

Provision for 
Income Taxes 

Adjusted Net 
Income

Year ended December 31, 2009 
  Fleet 
  MasterCard 

  $

281,017   $
37,207  

11,723   $
1,551  

16,655   $ 
210  

47,615   $
5,149  

77,194  
8,422  

  Total 

  $

318,224   $

13,274   $

16,865   $ 

52,764   $

85,616  

Year ended December 31, 2008 
  Fleet 
  MasterCard 

  $

366,610   $
26,972  

32,148   $
2,845  

19,483   $ 
640  

34,900   $
2,217  

69,993
4,155

  Total 

  $

393,582   $

34,993   $

20,123   $ 

37,117   $

74,148

Year ended December 31, 2007 
  Fleet 
  MasterCard 

  $

313,618   $
22,510  

31,490   $
2,596  

14,299   $ 
719  

123,240   $
2,050  

72,357  
3,653  

  Total 

  $

336,128   $

34,086   $

15,018   $ 

125,290   $

76,010  

The following table reconciles adjusted net income to net income: 

Adjusted net income 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments 
Amortization of acquired intangible assets 
Asset impairment charge 
Non-cash adjustments related to tax receivable agreement 
Gain on extinguishment of liability 
Tax impact 

Net income 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

85,616  $
(43,142)
(5,066)
(814)
(599)
136,485
(32,821)

74,148  $
90,892 
(4,854) 
(1,538) 
— 
— 
(31,008) 

76,010 
(37,074) 
(1,089) 
— 
— 
— 
13,730 

$

139,659  $

127,640  $

51,577 

The tax impact of the foregoing adjustments is the difference between the Company’s GAAP tax provision and a pro forma tax 

provision based upon the Company’s adjusted net income before taxes.  The methodology utilized for calculating the Company’s 
adjusted net income tax provision is the same methodology utilized in calculating the Company’s GAAP tax provision.  

74

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (concluded) 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

Geographic Data 

Total revenues: 
  United States 
International 

Total revenues 

22.  Subsequent Event 

Year ended December 31, 
2008 

2007 

2009

$

$

314,808   $ 
3,416

393,137   $
445  

336,123  
5  

318,224   $ 

393,582   $

336,128  

On February 22, 2010, we purchased put option contracts and sold call option contracts, designed to be a costless collar, on the

price of gasoline and diesel fuel (collectively the “Options”). The Options have an aggregate notional amount of approximately 
9,657 gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel and will expire on a monthly basis during the first, second and third quarters of 2011. The 
settlement of the Options is based upon the U.S. Department of Energy’s weekly retail on-highway national US average diesel price
and the New York Mercantile Exchange nearby unleaded gasoline contracts for the month. The Options lock in a weighted average 
floor price of approximately $2.86 per gallon and a weighted average ceiling price of approximately $2.92 per gallon. 

23.  Quarterly Financial Results (Unaudited) 

Summarized quarterly results for the two years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, are as follows: 

2009
Total revenues 
Operating income 
Net income (loss) 
Earnings (loss) per share: 
  Basic 
  Diluted 

2008
Total revenues 
Operating income 
Net income 
Earnings per share: 
  Basic 
  Diluted 

March 31 

June 30 

September 30 December 31 

Three months ended 

  $
  $
  $

  $
  $

  $
  $
  $

  $
  $

69,176   $
19,324   $
10,977   $

78,626   $ 
32,372   $ 
93,190   $ 

86,642   $
36,346   $
23,363   $

0.29   $
0.28   $

2.43   $ 
2.36   $ 

0.61   $
0.60   $

92,946   $
37,068   $
14,528   $

111,238   $ 
50,948   $ 
(24,383 )  $ 

108,531   $
54,402   $
72,344   $

0.37   $
0.36   $

(0.63 )  $ 
(0.63 )  $ 

1.86   $
1.82   $

83,780  
30,108  
12,129  

0.32  
0.31  

80,867  
19,014  
65,151  

1.69  
1.66  

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL 

DISCLOSURE 

Not applicable. 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Wright Express Corporation evaluated the effectiveness of the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. "Disclosure controls and procedures" 
are controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company 
in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules 
and forms, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, and is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, 
including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required 
disclosure. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Wright Express Corporation 
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009. 

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

Wright Express' management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. 

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial 
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted 
in the United States of America. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive 
officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation was conducted of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting 
based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 
Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management 
concluded that Wright Express' internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009. 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, has been audited by Deloitte & 

Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein. 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended 

December 31, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over 
financial reporting. 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 

Not applicable. 

76

PART III 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Members of 

the Board of Directors," "Non-Director Members of the Executive Management Team," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership 
Reporting Compliance," "Director Nominations," "Communications with the Board of Directors," "Board and Committee Meetings" 
and "Corporate Governance Information," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

Website Availability of Corporate Governance and Other Documents 

The following documents are available on the Corporate Governance page of the investor relations section of the Company's 

website, www.wrightexpress.com:  (1) the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors,  (2) the Code of Ethics for Chief 
Executive and Senior Financial Officers,  (3) the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and  (4) key Board Committee 
charters, including charters for the Audit, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees. Stockholders also may obtain 
printed copies of these documents by submitting a written request to Investor Relations, Wright Express, 97 Darling Avenue, South
Portland, Maine 04106. The Company intends to post on its website, www.wrightexpress.com, all disclosures that are required by law
or New York Stock Exchange listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, the provisions of the documents 
referenced in (1) and (2) above. 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Executive 

Compensation" and the related subsections, "Director Compensation" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider 
Participation," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED 

STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Securities 

Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans" and "Principal Stockholders" and the related subsections, which 
information is incorporated herein by reference. 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 

See the information in the Company's proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Director 

Independence" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES 

See the section of the Company's proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders captioned "Auditor Selection 

and Fees," which information is incorporated herein by reference. 

77

PART IV 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 

The following documents are filed as part of this report: 

1.  Financial Statements (see Index to Financial Statements on page 3). 

Exhibit No. 

Description 

3.1 

  Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on 

March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

3.2 

  Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the 

SEC on November 20, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

4.1 

  Rights Agreement dated as of February 16, 2005, by and between Wright Express Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National 

Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005,
File No. 001-32426). 

10.1 

  Form of director indemnification agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed 

with the SEC on June 8, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.2 

  Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2005, by and between Cendant Corporation and Wright Express 

Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.3 

  Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement dated June 26, 2009 by and between Wright Express Corporation and Realogy 

Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 7, 2009,
File No. 001-32426). 

10.4 

  Ratification Agreement dated June 26, 2009 by and among Wright Express Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham 

Worldwide Corporation and Avis Budget Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 
8-K filed with the SEC on July 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.5 

  Guarantee, dated as of June 26, 2009, by Apollo Investment Fund VI, L.P., Apollo Overseas Partners VI, L.P., Apollo Overseas

Partners (Delaware) VI, L.P., Apollo Overseas Partners (Delaware892) VI, L.P. and Apollo Overseas Partners (Germany) VI, L.P. 
in favor of Wright Express Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC on May 7, 2009, File No. 001-324426) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 30, 2009, File No. 001-324426). 

10.6 

  Credit Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2007, among Wright Express Corporation, as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as 

administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a 
division of SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication
agent, BMO Capital Markets, KeyBank National Association, and TD Banknorth, N.A., as co-documentation agents, and the other 
lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on 
May 29, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.7 

  Guaranty, dated as of May 22, 2007, by and among Wright Express Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and

Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders party to the Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.8 

Incremental Amendment Agreement among Wright Express Corporation, as borrower; Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer; Banc of America Securities LLC; SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a division of SunTrust 
Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers; SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication agent; and with other
lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 3, 2008, File
No. 001-32426). 

10.9 

  Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2009, among Wright Express Corporation, as borrower, each lender from 
time to time party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 30, 2009, File No. 001-324426). 

†

†

10.10 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 

to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.11 

  Wright Express Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7 to our Registration

Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 10, 2005, File No. 333-120679). 

78

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
†

†

†

†

†

†

†

†

†*

† 

†

†

10.12 

  Wright Express Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.13 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit

No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.14 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Short Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1

to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 7, 2009, File No. 001-324426).** 

10.15 

  Wright Express Corporation Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Quarterly Report 

on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426).** 

10.16 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Severance Pay Plan for Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.

10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.17 

  Employment Agreement with Michael E. Dubyak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K 

filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.18 

  Form of Employment Agreement for David Maxsimic and Melissa Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.6 to our

Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.19 

  Form of Employment Agreement for Robert Cornett, Hilary Rapkin and Jamie Morin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7

to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.20 

  Form of Employment Agreement for George Hogan and Richard Stecklair. 

10.21 

  Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on 

Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

10.22 

  Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received prior to December 31, 2006)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2008, File No. 
001-32426). 

10.23 

  Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received subsequent to 

December 31, 2006)  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 5, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

10.24 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
April 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27,
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.25 

  Confirmation of transaction between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

10.26 

10.27 

ISDA Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005 (incorporated 
by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Schedule to the Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

10.28 

  Confirmation of transaction between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005 (incorporated by 

reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.29 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from J. Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with 
the SEC on October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.30 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from J. 

Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.31 

ISDA Credit Support Annex to the Schedule Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National 
Bank) and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly 
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

10.32 

  Amendment to the ISDA Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National Bank) and Wright 

Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-

79

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

10.33 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from 
Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.34 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by

Wright Express Corporation from Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

* 

10.35 

  Novation Agreement and New ISDA Agreement, dated as of October 23,  2009, among Wright Express Corporation, Bank of 

America, N.A., and Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. 

10.36 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express 
Corporation, dated as of June 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.37 

  Confirmation of transaction between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express Corporation,

dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.38 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 5, 2005 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 

10.39 

  Confirmation of transaction between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.40 

  Confirmation of transaction between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of July 22, 2009 (incorporated by 

reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 24, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.41 

10.42 

10.43 

10.44 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
June 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7,
2007, File No. 001-32426). 

  Confirmation of transaction between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 22, 2007 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Wachovia Bank, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as
of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 
2008, File No. 001-32426). 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

** 

† 

21.1 

  Subsidiaries of the registrant. 

23.1 

  Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm – Deloitte & Touche LLP. 

31.1 

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

31.2 

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

32.1 

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

32.2 

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

  Filed with this report. 

  Portions of exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which has been granted. 

  Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of 

this Form 10-K. 

80

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report 
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES 

February 25, 2010 

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION 

By:  /s/  Melissa D. Smith 
Melissa D. Smith 
CFO and Executive Vice President, Finance and 
Operations  
(principal financial and accounting officer) 

81

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on 
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 

February 25, 2010 

February 25, 2010 

February 25, 2010 

February 25, 2010 

February 24, 2010 

February 25, 2010 

February 25, 2010 

February 25, 2010 

/s/  Michael E. Dubyak 

  Michael E. Dubyak 

President, Chief Executive Officer and

  Chairman of the Board of Directors
  (principal executive officer)

/s/  Rowland T. Moriarty 

  Rowland T. Moriarty 

Lead Director

  /s/  Shikhar Ghosh 
Shikhar Ghosh 

  Director

/s/  Ronald T. Maheu 

  Ronald T. Maheu 

Director

/s/  George L. McTavish 

  George L. McTavish 

Director

  /s/  Kirk Pond 
Kirk Pond 

  Director

/s/  Regina O. Sommer 

  Regina O. Sommer 

Director

  /s/  Jack A. VanWoerkom 
Jack A. VanWoerkom 

  Director

82

  
    
    
  
  
  
  
   
    
   
    
   
    
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
    
    
  
    
    
     
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
    
    
  
    
    
     
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
    
    
  
    
    
     
  
  
  
  
   
    
Exhibit No. 

EXHIBIT INDEX 

Description 

3.1 

  Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on 

March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

3.2 

  Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the 

SEC on November 20, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

4.1 

  Rights Agreement dated as of February 16, 2005, by and between Wright Express Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National 

Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005,
File No. 001-32426). 

10.1 

  Form of director indemnification agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed 

with the SEC on June 8, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.2 

  Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2005, by and between Cendant Corporation and Wright Express 

Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.3 

  Tax Receivable Prepayment Agreement dated June 26, 2009 by and between Wright Express Corporation and Realogy 

Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 7, 2009,
File No. 001-32426). 

10.4 

  Ratification Agreement dated June 26, 2009 by and among Wright Express Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham 

Worldwide Corporation and Avis Budget Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 
8-K filed with the SEC on July 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.5 

  Guarantee, dated as of June 26, 2009, by Apollo Investment Fund VI, L.P., Apollo Overseas Partners VI, L.P., Apollo Overseas

Partners (Delaware) VI, L.P., Apollo Overseas Partners (Delaware892) VI, L.P. and Apollo Overseas Partners (Germany) VI, L.P. 
in favor of Wright Express Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC on May 7, 2009, File No. 001-324426) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 30, 2009, File No. 001-324426). 

10.6 

  Credit Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2007, among Wright Express Corporation, as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as 

administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a 
division of SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication
agent, BMO Capital Markets, KeyBank National Association, and TD Banknorth, N.A., as co-documentation agents, and the other 
lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on 
May 29, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.7 

  Guaranty, dated as of May 22, 2007, by and among Wright Express Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and

Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders party to the Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.8 

Incremental Amendment Agreement among Wright Express Corporation, as borrower; Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer; Banc of America Securities LLC; SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a division of SunTrust 
Capital Markets, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers; SunTrust Bank, Inc., as syndication agent; and with other
lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 3, 2008, File
No. 001-32426). 

10.9 

  Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2009, among Wright Express Corporation, as borrower, each lender from 
time to time party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 30, 2009, File No. 001-324426). 

†

†

†

†

10.10 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 

to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.11 

  Wright Express Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7 to our Registration

Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 10, 2005, File No. 333-120679). 

10.12 

  Wright Express Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.13 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit

No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

83

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
†

†

†

†

†

†

†*

† 

†

†

10.14 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Short Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1

to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 7, 2009, File No. 001-324426).** 

10.15 

  Wright Express Corporation Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Quarterly Report 

on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426).** 

10.16 

  Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Severance Pay Plan for Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.

10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.17 

  Employment Agreement with Michael E. Dubyak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K 

filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.18 

  Form of Employment Agreement for David Maxsimic and Melissa Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.6 to our

Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.19 

  Form of Employment Agreement for Robert Cornett, Hilary Rapkin and Jamie Morin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.7

to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.20 

  Form of Employment Agreement for George Hogan and Richard Stecklair. 

10.21 

  Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on 

Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

10.22 

  Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received prior to December 31, 2006)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2008, File No. 
001-32426). 

10.23 

  Form of Non-Employee Director Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (for grants received subsequent to 

December 31, 2006)  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 5, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

10.24 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
April 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27,
2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.25 

  Confirmation of transaction between CITIBANK, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

10.26 

10.27 

ISDA Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005 (incorporated 
by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

ISDA Schedule to the Master Agreement between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 20, 2005 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No.
001-32426). 

10.28 

  Confirmation of transaction between Fleet National Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated April 21, 2005 (incorporated by 

reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.29 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from J. Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with 
the SEC on October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.30 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from J. 

Aron & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
October 28, 2005, File No. 001-32426). 

10.31 

ISDA Credit Support Annex to the Schedule Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National 
Bank) and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly 
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

10.32 

  Amendment to the ISDA Master Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. (successor to Fleet National Bank) and Wright 

Express Corporation, dated as of August 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, File No. 001-32426). 

10.33 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Diesel put options and call options by Wright Express Corporation from 
Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on 
August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.34 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases and sales of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by

84

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wright Express Corporation from Bank of America, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

* 

10.35 

  Novation Agreement and New ISDA Agreement, dated as of October 23,  2009, among Wright Express Corporation, Bank of 

America, N.A., and Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. 

10.36 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express 
Corporation, dated as of June 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.37 

  Confirmation of transaction between Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Wright Express Corporation,

dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.38 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of April 5, 2005 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 

10.39 

  Confirmation of transaction between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No. 001-32426). 

10.40 

  Confirmation of transaction between SunTrust Bank and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of July 22, 2009 (incorporated by 

reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 24, 2009, File No. 001-32426). 

10.41 

10.42 

10.43 

10.44 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of 
June 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7,
2007, File No. 001-32426). 

  Confirmation of transaction between KeyBank National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as of August 22, 2007 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2007, File No.
001-32426). 

ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule between Wachovia Bank, National Association and Wright Express Corporation, dated as
of July 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 
2008, File No. 001-32426). 

  Form of confirmation evidencing purchases of Nymex Unleaded Regular Gasoline put options and call options by Wright Express 
Corporation from Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008, File No. 001-32426). 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

** 

† 

21.1 

  Subsidiaries of the registrant. 

23.1 

  Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm – Deloitte & Touche LLP. 

31.1 

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

31.2 

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

32.1 

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

32.2 

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

  Filed with this report. 

  Portions of exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which has been granted. 

  Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of 

this Form 10-K. 

(cid:3)

85

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This page intentionally left blank 

FROM THE BEGINNING
 OF OUR HISTORY, 
WRIGHT EXPRESS 
HAS HAD A VISION
BUILT ON RELATIONSHIPS. 

ABOUT WRIGHT EXPRESS

Wright Express is a leading global provider of payment 

of the nation’s retail fuel locations and over 45,000 vehicle 

processing and information management services. 

maintenance locations. Our proprietary software gives 

Wright Express captures and combines transaction 

fl eets the ability to control purchases in the fi eld, and 

information from its proprietary network with specialized 

delivers comprehensive information and analysis tools 

analytical tools and purchasing control capabilities in a 

that allow fl eets to effectively manage their operations 

suite of solutions that enable  fl eets to manage their 

and reduce costs.

vehicles more effectively. The Company’s charge cards are 

used by commercial and government fl eets to purchase 

fuel and maintenance services for approximately 4.6 

million vehicles. 

In addition to our proprietary closed network, we also 

utilize MasterCard’s open network to issue a Wright 

Express branded corporate MasterCard. This product 

offering provides customers with a payment processing 

Wright Express markets its services directly to fl eets and 

solution for their non-vehicle related corporate purchasing 

as an outsourcing partner for its strategic relationships 

and transaction monitoring needs and allows Wright 

and franchisees. The Company’s business portfolio 

Express to be a single source for all of a company’s 

includes a MasterCard-branded corporate card as 

payment processing and purchasing information 

well as TelaPoint, a provider of supply chain software 

management needs.

solutions for petroleum distributors and retailers, and 

Pacifi c Pride, an independent fuel distributor franchisee 

network, as well as international subsidiaries.

For more than 25 years we have built our proprietary 

closed network to have site acceptance at over 90 percent 

Wright Express Stock is traded on the New York Stock 

Exchange under the ticker symbol “WXS.”

DIRECTORS
Michael E. Dubyak 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive 
Offi cer of Wright Express Corporation

Rowland T. Moriarty
President and Chief Executive Offi cer 
of Cubex Corporation

Shikhar Ghosh 
The Harvard Business School

Ronald T. Maheu 
Financial and Business Consultant

Larry McTavish 
Chief Executive Offi cer and Chairman 
of Source Medical Corporation

Kirk Pond 
Former Chairman, President and CEO 
of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.

Regina O. Sommer 
Financial and Business Consultant 

Jack A. VanWoerkom
Executive Vice President, General 
Counsel and Corporate Secretary of 
The Home Depot, Inc.

TRANSFER AGENT
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
866-668-6550

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED 
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
617-437-2000

ATTORNEYS
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
617-526-6000

STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING
Date: May 21, 2010
Time: 8:00 a.m.

Location: Wright Express Long Creek Campus
225 Gorham Road
South Portland, Maine
Phone: 207-773-8171
Toll Free: 800-761-7181

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Michael E. Dubyak 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Offi cer 

TICKER SYMBOL:
NYSE WXS

Melissa D. Smith
Chief Financial Offi cer and Executive 
Vice President, Finance and Operations

David D. Maxsimic 
Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing

Robert C. Cornett 
Senior Vice President, Human Resources 

George Hogan
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Offi cer 

Jamie Morin
Senior Vice President, Client Services Organization

Hilary A. Rapkin 
Senior Vice President, General Counsel 
and Corporate Secretary

Richard K. Stecklair
Senior Vice President, Corporate Payment Solutions

Gregory S. Strzegowski
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development

INVESTOR RELATIONS
Steve Elder
Vice President, Corporate Finance
866-230-1633
Email: steve_elder@wrightexpress.com

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
Wright Express Corporation
97 Darling Avenue
South Portland, ME 04106
Phone: 207-773-8171
Toll Free: 800-761-7181
Email: newsroom@wrightexpress.com
URL: www.wrightexpress.com

FORM 10-K
A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K, fi led with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission, is available  
without charge upon written request to: Wright Express 
Corporation, Investor Relations, 97 Darling Avenue, 
South Portland, ME 04106; by calling 866-230-1633; 
or by emailing investors@wrightexpress.com.

37053_CVR.indd   2

37053_CVR.indd   2

3/23/10   11:43:52 AM

3/23/10   11:43:52 AM

ANNUAL REPORT ‘09

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

97 DARLING AVENUE

SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106

PHONE: (207) 773-8171

TOLL FREE: (800) 761-7181

NEWSROOM@WRIGHTEXPRESS.COM

WWW.WRIGHTEXPRESS.COM

37053_CVR.indd   1

37053_CVR.indd   1

3/23/10   11:43:35 AM

3/23/10   11:43:35 AM