UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☑
☐
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 001-35077
Wintrust Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Illinois
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
36-3873352
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
9700 W. Higgins Road, Suite 800
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (847) 939-9000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, no par value
Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D, no par value
Depositary Shares, Each Representing a 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of
6.875% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series E, no par value
Trading
Symbol(s)
WTFC
WTFCM
WTFCP
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definition of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
☑
☐
Accelerated filer
Emerging growth company
☐
☐
Non-Accelerated filer
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. þ Yes ¨ No
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously
issued financial statements. ¨ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ¨ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☑ No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2023 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second
quarter), determined using the closing price of the common stock on that day of $72.62, as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market, was $4,404,517,696.
As of February 26, 2024, the registrant had 61,472,818 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 23, 2024 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 1
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 1C.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9B.
ITEM 9C.
PART I
Business ............................................................................................................................................
Risk Factors .......................................................................................................................................
Unresolved Staff Comments .............................................................................................................
Cybersecurity ....................................................................................................................................
Properties .........................................................................................................................................
Legal Proceedings ............................................................................................................................
Mine Safety Disclosures ..................................................................................................................
PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities ..............................................................................................................................
[Reserved] .........................................................................................................................................
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ..........
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ..........................................................
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .................................................................................
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ..........
Controls and Procedures ..................................................................................................................
Other Information .............................................................................................................................
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections ..............................................
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance ................................................................
Executive Compensation ...................................................................................................................
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters ..............................................................................................................................................
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence .................................
Principal Accountant Fees and Services ...........................................................................................
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 16.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules ..........................................................................................
Form 10-K Summary ........................................................................................................................
Signatures ..........................................................................................................................................
Page
3
23
44
44
45
46
46
47
48
49
94
96
171
171
174
174
174
174
175
175
175
176
182
183
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Wintrust Financial Corporation, an Illinois corporation (“we,” “Wintrust” or “the Company”), which was incorporated in 1992,
is a financial holding company based in Rosemont, Illinois, with total assets of approximately $56.3 billion as of December 31,
2023. We provide community-oriented, personal and commercial banking services to customers generally located in the
Chicago metropolitan area, southern Wisconsin and northwest Indiana (“our market area”) through our fifteen wholly-owned-
banking subsidiaries (collectively, the “banks”), as well as the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into
the secondary market through Wintrust Mortgage, a division of Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Barrington Bank”).
In addition, we provide specialty finance services, including financing for the payment of property and casualty insurance
premiums and life insurance premiums (“premium finance receivables”) on a national basis through FIRST Insurance Funding,
a division of our wholly-owned subsidiary Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Lake Forest Bank”), and Wintrust Life
Finance, a division of Lake Forest Bank, and in Canada through our premium finance company, First Insurance Funding of
Canada (“FIFC Canada”), an indirect subsidiary of Lake Forest Bank, lease financing and other direct leasing opportunities
through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Wintrust Asset Finance, Inc. (“Wintrust Asset Finance”), and short-term accounts
receivable financing and outsourced administrative services through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee
(“Tricom”). Further, we provide a full range of wealth management services primarily to customers in our market area through
four separate subsidiaries, The Chicago Trust Company, N.A. (“CTC”), Wintrust Investments, LLC (“Wintrust Investments”),
Great Lakes Advisors, LLC (“Great Lakes Advisors”) and Chicago Deferred Exchange Company, LLC (“CDEC”).
Our Business and Reporting Segments
As set forth in Note (24) “Segment Information”, our operations consist of three primary segments: community banking,
specialty finance and wealth management. The three reportable segments are strategic business units that are separately
managed as they offer different products and services and have different marketing strategies. In addition, each segment’s
customer base has varying characteristics and each segment has a different regulatory environment. While the Company’s
management monitors each of the fifteen bank subsidiaries’ operations and profitability separately, these subsidiaries have been
aggregated into one reportable operating segment due to the similarities in products and services, customer base, operations,
profitability measures and economic characteristics. All segment measurements discussed below are based on the reportable
segments and do not reflect intersegment eliminations.
Community Banking
Through our community banking segment, our banks provide community-oriented, personal and commercial banking services
to customers located in our market area. Our customers include individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental
units and institutional clients residing primarily in the banks’ local service areas. The banks have a strategy to provide
comprehensive community-focused banking services. In keeping with this strategy, the banks provide highly personalized and
responsive services, a characteristic of locally-owned and managed institutions. As such, the banks compete for deposits
principally by offering depositors a variety of deposit programs, convenient office locations, hours and other services, and for
loan originations primarily through the interest rates and loan fees they charge, the efficiency and quality of services they
provide to borrowers and the variety of their loan and treasury management products. Using our multiple bank charter corporate
structure to our advantage, we offer our MaxSafe® deposit accounts, which provide customers with expanded Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage by spreading a customer’s deposit across our fifteen banks. This product
differentiates our banks from many of our competitors that have consolidated their bank charters into branches. We also have
downtown Chicago and Milwaukee offices that work with each of our banks to capture commercial and industrial business. Our
commercial and industrial lenders in our downtown offices operate in close partnership with lenders at our community banks.
By combining our expertise in the commercial and industrial sector with our high level of personal service and a full suite of
banking products, we believe we create another point of differentiation from both our larger and smaller competitors. Our banks
also offer home equity, consumer, and real estate loans, safe deposit facilities, ATMs, online and mobile banking and other
innovative and traditional services specially tailored to meet the needs of customers in their market areas.
We developed our banking franchise through a combination of de novo organizations and the purchase of existing bank
franchises. The organizational efforts began in 1991, when a group of experienced bankers and local business people identified
an unfilled niche in the Chicago metropolitan area retail banking market. As large banks acquired smaller ones and personal
service was subjected to consolidation strategies, the opportunity increased for locally owned and operated, highly personal
3
service-oriented banks. As a result, Lake Forest Bank was founded in December 1991 to service the Lake Forest and Lake Bluff
communities within the Chicago metropolitan area.
As of December 31, 2023, we owned fifteen nationally chartered banks: Lake Forest Bank, Barrington Bank, Wintrust Bank,
N.A. (“Wintrust Bank”), Libertyville Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Libertyville Bank”), Northbrook Bank & Trust
Company, N.A. (“Northbrook Bank”), Village Bank & Trust, N.A. (“Village Bank”), Wheaton Bank & Trust Company, N.A.
(“Wheaton Bank”), State Bank of the Lakes, N.A., Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Crystal Lake Bank”),
Schaumburg Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Schaumburg Bank”), Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Beverly Bank”),
Old Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A. (“Old Plank Trail Bank”), Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Hinsdale Bank”),
St. Charles Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“St. Charles Bank”) and Town Bank, N.A. (“Town Bank”). As of December 31,
2023, we had 174 banking locations. Each nationally-chartered bank is subject to regulation, supervision and regular
examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”).
We also engage in the retail origination and purchase of residential mortgages through Wintrust Mortgage as well as consumer
direct lending primarily to veterans through our Veterans First brand. Certain originated loans are sold to unaffiliated
companies or the Company’s banks with servicing remaining within Wintrust Mortgage operations. Wintrust Mortgage
maintains retail mortgage offices in a number of states, with the largest concentration located in the Chicago, Minneapolis, Salt
Lake City and Los Angeles metropolitan areas.
We also offer several niche lending products through several of the banks. These include Barrington Bank’s Community
Advantage program, which provides lending, deposit and treasury management services to condominium, homeowner and
community associations; Hinsdale Bank’s mortgage warehouse lending program, which provides loan and deposit services to
mortgage brokerage companies located predominantly in the Chicago metropolitan area; Lake Forest Bank’s insurance agency
finance lending program, which provides financing to insurance agents and businesses; and Lake Forest Bank’s franchise
lending program, which provides lending to restaurant franchisees. Other niches offered throughout our banking franchise
include Wintrust Commercial Finance, which offers direct leasing opportunities; Wintrust Business Credit, which specializes in
asset-based lending for middle-market companies; Wintrust SBA Lending, which is dedicated to offering expertise in Small
Business Administration (“SBA”) loans; Wintrust Commercial Real Estate, which concentrates on real estate lending solutions
including commercial mortgages and construction loans; and Wintrust Government, Non-Profit & Hospital, which focuses on
financial solutions for mission-based organizations such as hospitals, non-profits, educational institutions and local government
operations. In addition, we offer a niche deposit service through our Northbrook Bank’s Funds Group.
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the community banking segment had net revenues of $1.7 billion, $1.5
billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, and net income of $414 million, $349 million and $319 million, respectively. The
community banking segment had total assets of $44.4 billion, $41.4 billion and $40.3 billion as of December 31, 2023, 2022
and 2021, respectively. The community banking segment accounted for approximately 74% of our consolidated net revenues,
excluding intersegment eliminations, for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Specialty Finance
Through our specialty finance segment, we offer financing of insurance premiums for businesses and individuals; accounts
receivable financing, value-added, out-sourced administrative services; and other specialty finance businesses. FIRST Insurance
Funding and Wintrust Life Finance engage in the premium finance receivables business, our most significant specialized
lending niche, including property and casualty insurance premium finance and life insurance premium finance. We also engage
in property and casualty insurance premium finance in Canada through our wholly-owned subsidiary FIFC Canada.
In their property and casualty insurance premium finance operations, FIRST Insurance Funding and FIFC Canada make loans
primarily to businesses to finance the insurance premiums they pay on their property and casualty insurance policies. Approved
medium and large insurance agents and brokers located throughout the United States and Canada assist FIRST Insurance
Funding and FIFC Canada, respectively, in arranging each commercial premium finance loan between the borrower and FIRST
Insurance Funding or FIFC Canada, as the case may be. FIRST Insurance Funding or FIFC Canada evaluates each loan request
according to its own underwriting criteria including the amount of the down payment on the insurance policy, the term of the
loan, the credit quality of the insurance company providing the financed insurance policy, the interest rate, the borrower's
previous payment history, if any, and other factors deemed appropriate. Upon approval of the loan by FIRST Insurance Funding
or FIFC Canada, as the case may be, the borrower makes a down payment on the financed insurance policy, which is generally
done by providing payment to the agent or broker, who then forwards it to the insurance company. FIRST Insurance Funding or
FIFC Canada may either forward the financed amount of the remaining policy premiums directly to the insurance carrier or to
the agent or broker for remittance to the insurance carrier on FIRST Insurance Funding’s or FIFC Canada’s behalf. In some
cases, the agent or broker may hold our collateral, in the form of the proceeds of the unearned insurance premium from the
4
insurance company, and forward it to FIRST Insurance Funding or FIFC Canada in the event of a default by the borrower. This
lending involves relatively rapid turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan originations. Because the agent or
broker is the primary contact to the ultimate borrowers who are located nationwide and because proceeds and our collateral may
be handled by the agent or brokers during the term of the loan, FIRST Insurance Funding and FIFC Canada may be more
susceptible to third party (i.e., agent or broker) fraud. The Company performs various controls and procedures including
ongoing credit and other reviews of the agents and brokers as well as performs various internal audit steps to mitigate against
the risk of material fraud.
The commercial and property premium finance business is subject to regulation in the majority of states. Regulation typically
governs notices to borrowers prior to cancellation of a policy and required communication to insurance agents and insurance
companies. FIRST Insurance Funding offers financing of property and casualty insurance policies in all 50 states, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. FIRST Insurance Funding’s legal department regularly monitors changes
to regulations and updates policies and programs accordingly.
Wintrust Life Finance finances life insurance policy premiums generally used for estate planning purposes of high net-worth
borrowers. These loans are originated directly with the borrowers with assistance from life insurance carriers, independent
insurance agents, financial advisors and legal counsel. The cash surrender value of the life insurance policy is the primary form
of collateral. In addition, these loans often are secured with a letter of credit, marketable securities or certificates of deposit. In
some cases, Wintrust Life Finance may make a loan that has a partially unsecured position.
The life insurance premium finance business is subject to banking regulations but is not subject to additional regulatory regimes
(e.g. additional state regulation). Wintrust Life Finance’s compliance department regularly monitors the regulatory environment
and compliance with existing regulations. Wintrust Life Finance maintains a policy prohibiting the known financing of
stranger-originated life insurance and has established procedures to identify and prevent financing such policies. While a carrier
could potentially put at risk the cash surrender value of a policy, which serves as Wintrust Life Finance’s primary collateral, by
challenging the validity of the insurance contract for lack of an insurable interest, Wintrust Life Finance believes it has strong
counterclaims against any such claims by carriers, in addition to recourse to borrowers and guarantors as well as to additional
collateral in certain cases.
Premium finance loans made by FIRST Insurance Funding, Wintrust Life Finance and FIFC Canada are primarily secured by
the insurance policies financed by the loans. These insurance policies are written by a large number of insurance companies
geographically dispersed throughout the United States and Canada. Our premium finance receivables balances finance
insurance policies that are spread among a large number of insurers; however, one of the insurers represents approximately 11%
of such balances and two additional insurers represent approximately 6% each of such balances. FIRST Insurance Funding,
Wintrust Life Finance and FIFC Canada consistently monitor carrier ratings and financial performance of our carriers. In the
event carrier ratings fall below certain levels, most of Wintrust Life Finance’s life insurance premium finance policies provide
for an event of default and allow Wintrust Life Finance to have recourse to borrowers and guarantors as well as to additional
collateral in certain cases. For the commercial premium finance business, the term of the loans is sufficiently short such that in
the event of a decline in carrier ratings, FIRST Insurance Funding or FIFC Canada, as the case may be, can restrict or eliminate
additional loans to finance premiums to such carriers. The majority of premium finance receivables are purchased by the banks
in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as these loans generally provide the banks with higher yields than alternative
investments.
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Wintrust Asset Finance, we provide equipment financing through structured loan and
lease products to customers in a variety of industries throughout the United States. Wintrust Asset Finance provides financing
of fixed assets consisting of property, plant and equipment, transportation (trucks, trailers, rail, marine, buses), construction,
manufacturing equipment, technology, oil and gas, restaurant equipment, medical and healthcare. As of December 31, 2023, the
Company’s leasing portfolio, including direct financing leases, loans and equipment on operating leases, totaled $3.4 billion
compared to $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2022. During 2023, Wintrust Asset Finance contributed approximately $77.5
million to our revenue, which does not reflect intersegment eliminations.
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Tricom, we provide high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing and value-
added, outsourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services to the
temporary staffing industry. Tricom’s clients, located throughout the United States, provide staffing services to businesses in
diversified industries. During 2023, Tricom processed payrolls with associated client billings of approximately $703.6 million
and contributed approximately $11.1 million to our revenue, net of interest expense, which does not reflect intersegment
eliminations.
5
In 2023, our commercial premium finance operations, life insurance premium finance operations, leasing operations and
accounts receivable finance operations accounted for 44%, 35%, 18% and 3%, respectively, of the total revenues of our
specialty finance business. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 the specialty finance segment had net
revenues of $435 million, $344 million and $294 million, respectively, and net income of $176 million, $121 million and $109
million, respectively. The specialty finance segment had total assets of $10.7 billion, $9.8 billion and $8.4 billion as of
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The specialty finance segment accounted for 19% of our consolidated net
revenues, excluding intersegment eliminations, for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Wealth Management
Through our wealth management segment, we offer a full range of wealth management services through four separate
subsidiaries (CTC, Wintrust Investments, Great Lakes Advisors and CDEC): trust and investment services, tax-deferred like-
kind exchange services, asset management solutions, securities brokerage services and 401(k) and retirement plan services.
Wintrust Investments, our registered broker/dealer subsidiary which has been operating since 1931, provides a full range of
private client and securities brokerage services to clients located primarily in the Midwest. Wintrust Investments is
headquartered in downtown Chicago, operates an office in Appleton, Wisconsin, and has established branch locations in offices
at a majority of our banks. Wintrust Investments also provides a full range of investment services to clients through a network
of relationships with community-based financial institutions primarily located in Illinois. Wintrust Investments is regulated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) as a registered
broker-dealer, as well as by the SEC as a registered investment adviser.
CTC, our trust subsidiary, offers trust and investment management services to clients through offices located in downtown
Chicago and at various banking offices of our fifteen banks. CTC is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination
by the OCC.
Great Lakes Advisors, our registered investment adviser with locations in downtown Chicago, Tampa, Florida, and Stamford,
Connecticut, as well as in various banking offices of our fifteen banks, provides money management services and advisory
services to individuals, institutions, and municipal and tax-exempt organizations. Great Lakes Advisors also provides portfolio
management and financial advisory services for a wide range of pension and profit-sharing plans as well as money management
and advisory services to CTC. Great Lakes Advisors is regulated by the SEC as a registered investment adviser.
CDEC, our provider of tax-deferred like-kind exchange services, provides Qualified Intermediary services (as defined by U.S.
Treasury regulations) for taxpayers seeking to structure tax-deferred like-kind exchanges under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”)
Section 1031. Under IRC Section 1031, a taxpayer may defer the gain on the sale of certain investment property if the taxpayer
utilizes the services of a Qualified Intermediary. These transactions typically generate customer deposits during the period
following the sale of the property until such proceeds are used to purchase a replacement property. These deposits may flow
into our banks as a source of low-cost deposits. CDEC is the subsidiary of Elektra Holding Company, LLC (“Elektra”), which
was acquired by the Company in December of 2018.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s wealth management subsidiaries had approximately $47.1 billion of assets under
administration, which included $8.7 billion of assets owned by the Company and its subsidiary banks. For the years ended
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the wealth management segment had net revenues of $169 million, $163 million and $161
million, respectively, and net income of $33 million, $39 million and $38 million, respectively. The wealth management
segment had total assets of $1.2 billion, $1.8 billion and $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The wealth management segment accounted for 7% of our consolidated net revenues, excluding intersegment eliminations, for
the year ended December 31, 2023.
Strategy and Competition
The Company has employed certain strategies since 2013 to achieve strong net income amid increased competition and an
environment, that up until recent months, was characterized by low interest rates. In general, the Company has taken a steady
and measured approach to grow strategically and manage expenses. Specifically, the Company has:
•
•
•
Leveraged its internal loan pipeline and external growth opportunities to grow earnings assets to increase net interest
income;
Continued to diversify our loan portfolio by adding product and geographic diversification;
Continued efforts to grow our deposit franchise in a diversified manner to be the Company’s primary funding source;
6
• Written call option contracts on certain securities as an economic hedge to mitigate overall interest rate risk and enhance
the securities’ overall return by using fees generated from these options;
Entered into mirror-image swap transactions to both satisfy customer preferences and maintain variable interest rate
exposure;
Completed strategic acquisitions to expand our presence in existing and complimentary markets;
Focused on cost control and leveraging our current infrastructure to grow without a commensurate increase in operating
expenses; and
Expanded the Wintrust Asset Finance direct leasing niche.
•
•
•
•
Our strategy and competitive position for each of our business segments is summarized in further detail, below.
Community Banking
We compete in the commercial banking industry through our banks in the communities they serve. The commercial banking
industry is highly competitive and the banks face strong direct competition for deposits, loans and other financial related
services. The banks compete with other commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions, stockbrokers, government-sponsored entities,
mutual fund companies, insurance companies, factoring companies and other commercial entities offering financial services
products, including non-bank financial companies and entities commonly known as financial technology companies. Some of
these competitors are local, while others are statewide or nationwide.
As a $56.3 billion asset financial services company, we expect to benefit from greater access to financial and managerial
resources than our smaller local competitors while maintaining our commitment to local decision-making and to our community
banking philosophy. In particular, we are able to provide a wider product selection and larger credit facilities than many of our
smaller competitors, and we believe our service offerings help us in recruiting talented staff. We continue to add lenders
throughout the community banking organization, many of whom have joined us because of our ability to offer a range of
products and level of services which compete effectively with both larger and smaller market participants. We have continued
to expand our product delivery systems, including a wide variety of electronic banking options for our retail and commercial
customers which allow us to provide a level of service typically associated with much larger banking institutions. Additionally,
we have access to public capital markets whereas many of our local competitors are privately held and may have limited
capital-raising capabilities.
Management views service as a great equalizer to offset some of the inherent advantages of its significantly larger competitors.
We also believe we are positioned to compete effectively with other larger and more diversified banks, bank holding companies
and other financial services companies due to the multi-chartered approach that pushes accountability for building a franchise
and a high level of customer service down to each of our banking franchises. Additionally, we believe that we provide a
relatively complete portfolio of products that is responsive to the majority of our customers’ needs through the retail and
commercial operations supplied by our banks, and through our mortgage and wealth management operations. The breadth of
our product mix allows us to compete effectively with our larger competitors, while our multi-chartered approach with local and
accountable management provides for what we believe is superior customer service relative to our larger and more centralized
competitors. We continue to grow and enhance our digital service offerings while maintaining our expectations of high quality,
more traditional banking services.
Wintrust Mortgage competes with large mortgage brokers as well as other banking organizations. Consolidation, margin
compression, enhanced regulatory guidance and the promise of equal oversight for both banks and independent mortgage
lenders have created challenges for small and medium-sized independent mortgage lenders. Wintrust Mortgage’s size, bank
affiliation, regulatory competency, branding, technology, business development tools and reputation make us well positioned to
compete in this environment. Our continued ability to retain the majority of servicing on loans sold, including those loans sold
to the Company's banks, allows Wintrust Mortgage to continue to grow a more stable revenue stream. While earnings will
fluctuate with the rise and fall of long-term interest rates, we expect that mortgage banking revenue will be a continuous source
of revenue for us and our mortgage lending relationships will continue to provide franchise value to our other financial service
businesses.
We continue to review our branch footprint and in 2023, the Company opened one new branch location in its Florida market
area and closed one branch location in the Chicago metropolitan area. There was no material attrition or customer disruption in
connection with these footprint changes. It is important to note that while we see increased use of electronic services and are
investing heavily in digital capabilities to allow clients to choose how they want to be served, Wintrust will continue to
selectively open branches in areas where we are not represented.
7
Specialty Finance
FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance encounter intense competition from numerous other firms, including a
number of national commercial premium finance companies, companies affiliated with insurance carriers, independent
insurance brokers who offer premium finance services and other lending institutions. Some of our competitors are larger and
have greater financial and other resources. FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance compete with these entities by
emphasizing a high level of knowledge of the insurance industry, flexibility in structuring financing transactions, and the timely
funding of qualifying contracts. We believe that our commitment to service also distinguishes us from our competitors. FIFC
Canada competes with one national commercial premium finance company and a few regional providers.
Wintrust Asset Finance competes with other bank-affiliated, independent, captive and vendor equipment leasing and finance
companies. Wintrust Asset Finance believes a customer-focused origination philosophy, an experienced team, strong
underwriting discipline and expert asset management enables them to compete effectively in a growing and dynamic market.
Tricom competes with numerous other firms, including a small number of similar niche finance companies and payroll
processing firms, as well as various finance companies, banks and other lending institutions. Tricom’s management believes
that its commitment to service distinguishes it from competitors.
Wealth Management
Our wealth management companies (CTC, Wintrust Investments, Great Lakes Advisors and CDEC) compete with larger wealth
management subsidiaries of other larger bank holding companies as well as with other trust companies, brokerage and other
financial service companies, stockbrokers and financial advisors. We believe we can successfully compete for trust, tax
services, asset management and brokerage business by offering personalized attention and customer service to small to midsize
businesses and affluent individuals. We continue to recruit and hire experienced wealth management professionals from within
the larger Chicago metropolitan area as well as Wisconsin and southwest Florida, which is expected to help in attracting new
customer relationships.
Supervision and Regulation
Regulatory Environment
Our business is heavily regulated and supervised by both federal and state agencies. Both the scope of the laws and regulations
and the intensity of the supervision to which our business is subject have increased in recent years, initially in response to the
financial crisis, and more recently in light of other factors such as the regional banking uncertainty in early 2023, technological
updates, and market changes. Regulatory enforcement and fines have also increased across the banking and financial services
sector. Many of these changes have occurred as a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(“Dodd-Frank Act”) and its implementing regulations, most of which are now in place. We expect that our business will remain
subject to extensive regulation and supervision.
The Company is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”), subject
to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Federal Reserve. The Company is also subject to the disclosure and
regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, both
as administered by the SEC, as well as the rules of NASDAQ that apply to companies with securities listed on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market. Each nationally-chartered bank is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the OCC.
The deposits of all of our subsidiary banks are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) and, as such, the FDIC has
additional oversight authority over the banks. The supervision, regulation and examination of banks and bank holding
companies by bank regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the DIF, and the banking system
as a whole, rather than shareholders of banks and bank holding companies, and in some instances may be contrary to
shareholders’ interests.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) has broad rulemaking authority over a wide range of federal consumer
protection laws applicable to the business of our subsidiary banks and some other operating subsidiaries. Because each of our
subsidiary banks has less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, our subsidiary banks’ federal banking agency, not the
CFPB, is responsible for examining and supervising the subsidiary banks’ compliance with federal consumer protection laws
and regulations. Our non-bank subsidiaries are subject to regulation by their functional regulators, including applicable state
finance and insurance agencies, the applicable exchanges, the SEC, FINRA, and the OCC, as well as by the Federal Reserve.
8
Federal and state laws, and the regulations of the bank regulatory agencies issued under them, affect the scope of business, the
kinds and amounts of investments banks may make, reserve requirements, capital levels, the nature and amount of collateral for
loans, the establishment of branches, the ability to merge, consolidate and acquire, dealings with insiders and affiliates and the
payment of dividends. The regulatory agencies have broad discretion to impose restrictions and limitations on the operations of
a regulated entity where the agencies determine, among other things, that such operations are unsafe or unsound, fail to comply
with applicable law or are otherwise inconsistent with laws and regulations or with the supervisory policies of these agencies.
The following is a description of some of the laws and regulations that affect our business. By necessity, the descriptions below
are summaries that do not purport to be complete, and that are qualified in their entirety by reference to those statutes and
regulations discussed, and all regulatory interpretations thereof. Any changes in applicable laws, regulations, or the
interpretations thereof could have a material adverse effect on our business or the business of our subsidiaries.
Bank Holding Company Regulation
The Company is a bank holding company that has elected to be treated as a financial holding company. The activities of bank
holding companies generally are limited to the business of banking, managing or controlling banks, and certain other activities
determined by the Federal Reserve to be closely related to banking. As a financial holding company, we may engage in an
expanded range of activities, including activities that are considered to be financial in nature. Financial holding companies may
also engage in activities incidental or complementary to financial activities, if the Federal Reserve determines that such
activities pose no substantial risk to the safety or soundness of depository institutions or the financial system in general.
Impermissible activities for financial holding companies and their subsidiaries include activities that are related to commerce,
such as sales of nonfinancial products or manufacturing. As a result, subject to certain exceptions, the BHC Act generally
prohibits us from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of voting shares of any company engaged in activities that
are not permissible for us to engage in.
Maintaining our financial holding company status requires that the Company and each of our subsidiary banks remain “well-
capitalized” and “well-managed” as defined by regulation and that each of our subsidiary banks maintain at least a
“satisfactory” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”). If we or our subsidiary banks fail to continue to meet
these requirements, we could be subject to restrictions on new activities and acquisitions, and/or be required to cease and
possibly divest operations that conduct existing activities that are not permissible for a bank holding company that is not a
financial holding company.
The BHC Act generally requires us to obtain prior approval from the Federal Reserve before acquiring direct or indirect
ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of an additional bank or bank holding company, or to merge or
consolidate with another bank holding company. The Bank Merger Act generally requires our subsidiary banks to obtain prior
regulatory approval to merge or consolidate with, or acquire substantially all of the assets of or assume deposits of, another
bank. We must also be well-capitalized and well-managed, in order to acquire a bank located outside of our home state.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”) and Federal Reserve regulations and policy require us to serve as a source of
financial and managerial strength for our subsidiary banks, and to commit resources to support the banks. This support may be
required even if doing so may adversely affect our ability to meet other obligations.
Acquisitions of Ownership of the Company
Acquisitions of the Company’s voting stock above certain thresholds may be subject to prior regulatory notice or approval
under applicable federal banking laws. Investors are responsible for ensuring that they do not, directly or indirectly, acquire
shares of our stock in excess of the amount that can be acquired without regulatory approval or notice under the BHC Act and
the Change in Bank Control Act.
9
Volcker Rule
We are prohibited under the Volcker Rule from (1) engaging in short-term proprietary trading for our own account, and
(2) having certain ownership interests in and relationships with hedge funds or private equity funds. The fundamental
prohibitions of the Volcker Rule apply to banking entities of any size, including the Company and its bank subsidiaries. The
Volcker Rule regulations contain exemptions for market-making, hedging, underwriting, trading in U.S. government and
agency obligations and also permit certain ownership interests in certain types of funds to be retained. They also permit the
offering and sponsoring of funds under certain conditions. The Volcker Rule regulations impose significant compliance and
reporting obligations on banking entities. The Company has put in place the compliance programs required by the Volcker Rule
and has either divested or received extensions for any holdings in illiquid funds. The Company will continue to monitor
Volcker Rule-related developments and assess their impact on its operations as necessary.
Capital Requirements of the Company and Subsidiary Banks
We and our subsidiary banks are required to maintain minimum risk-based and leverage capital ratios, as well as a capital
conservation buffer (“Capital Conservation Buffer”), pursuant to regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve and the OCC to
implement the Basel III capital framework (“U.S. Basel III Rule”).
Regulatory Capital and Risk-weighted Assets
Regulatory capital requirements apply to Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital.
•
•
•
Common Equity Tier 1 capital consists primarily of common stock and related surplus (net of treasury stock), retained
earnings, and certain minority interests, subject to certain regulatory adjustments. For us and our subsidiary banks,
Common Equity Tier 1 capital does not include most elements of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”)
because we exercised an opt-out election that was available to us with respect to certain changes in the capital treatment
of AOCI. We made this election to avoid variations in the level of our capital depending on fluctuations in the fair value
of our securities and derivatives portfolio.
Tier 1 capital is composed of Common Equity Tier 1 capital and Additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital
consists primarily of non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus, certain minority interests and, subject
to certain regulatory limits, certain grandfathered cumulative perpetual preferred stock and certain grandfathered trust
preferred securities.
Total capital is composed of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital consists primarily of capital instruments and
related surplus meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual
preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock, certain trust preferred securities and
subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for credit losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of
risk-weighted assets (“RWAs”) and, for institutions that have exercised the opt-out election regarding the treatment of
AOCI up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market
values.
Certain adjustments to and deductions from capital are required for purposes of calculating these regulatory capital measures,
including with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, certain deferred tax assets, AOCI and investments in the capital
instruments of unconsolidated financial institutions. In July 2019, the U.S. bank regulators finalized changes to certain aspects
of the U.S. Basel III capital rules that simplified, for certain bank holding companies and banks, including us and our subsidiary
banks, the framework for capital deductions for mortgage servicing assets, certain deferred tax assets and investments in the
capital instruments of unconsolidated financial institutions, and the recognition of minority interests in regulatory capital. These
amendments were effective as of April 1, 2020.
Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. federal banking agencies, the Company has elected to delay, for regulatory capital
purposes, the day-one impact of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic
326) (“CECL”) on retained earnings over a period of five years. Under the five-year transition, the Company deferred for two
years 100% of the day-one effect of adopting CECL and 25% of the cumulative increase or decrease in the allowance for credit
losses since the adoption of CECL. The Company continues to transition over the next two years in compliance with the rule.
For further discussion of the CECL accounting standard, including the Company’s implementation of such guidance, see
“Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates” under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Capital Ratio Requirements
Under the U.S. Basel III Rule, we and our subsidiary banks are required to maintain the following minimum capital ratios:
10
•
•
•
•
Tier 1 capital to quarterly average assets (net of goodwill, certain other intangible assets and certain other deductions)
ratio (“Tier 1 Leverage Ratio”) of 4.0%;
Tier 1 capital to RWAs ratio (“Tier 1 Capital Ratio”) of 6.0%;
Common Equity Tier 1 capital to RWAs ratio (“Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio”) of 4.5%; and
Total capital to RWAs ratio (“Total Capital Ratio”) of 8.0%.
To be well-capitalized, our subsidiary banks must maintain the following capital ratios:
•
•
•
•
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 5.0% or greater.
Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 8.0% or greater;
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 6.5% or greater; and
Total Capital Ratio of 10.0% or greater.
The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for bank holding companies to reflect the higher capital
requirements imposed under the U.S. Basel III Rule. For purposes of the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y, including
determining whether a bank holding company meets the requirements to be a financial holding company, bank holding
companies, such as the Company, must maintain a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 6.0% or greater and a Total Capital Ratio of 10.0% or
greater to be well-capitalized. If the Federal Reserve were to apply the same or a very similar well-capitalized standard to bank
holding companies as that applicable to our subsidiary banks, the Company’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2023 would
exceed such revised well-capitalized standard. The Federal Reserve may require bank holding companies, including us, to
maintain capital ratios substantially in excess of mandated minimum levels, depending upon general economic conditions and a
bank holding company’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans.
Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible
additional discretionary actions by regulators, including restrictions on our or our subsidiary banks’ ability to pay dividends or
otherwise distribute capital or to receive regulatory approval of applications, or other restrictions on growth. Such actions, if
undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our operations or financial condition.
In addition to meeting the minimum capital requirements, under the U.S. Basel III Rule, we and our banking subsidiaries must
also maintain the required Capital Conservation Buffer to avoid becoming subject to restrictions on capital distributions and
certain discretionary bonus payments to management. The Capital Conservation Buffer is 2.5% and is calculated as a ratio of
Common Equity Tier 1 capital to RWAs and it effectively increases the required minimum risk-based capital ratios. The Tier 1
Leverage Ratio is not impacted by the Capital Conservation Buffer, and a banking institution may be considered well-
capitalized while remaining out of compliance with the Capital Conservation Buffer.
The table below summarizes the capital requirements that we and our subsidiary banks must satisfy to avoid limitations on
capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments (i.e., the required minimum capital ratios plus the Capital
Conservation Buffer):
Tier 1 capital ratio
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Total Capital Ratio
Minimum Regulatory Capital Ratio Plus
Capital Conservation Buffer
8.50 %
7.00
10.50
11
As of December 31, 2023, our Company’s and our subsidiary banks’ regulatory capital ratios were above the well-capitalized
standards and met the Capital Conservation Buffer. Based on current estimates, we believe that we and our subsidiary banks
will continue to exceed all applicable well-capitalized regulatory capital requirements and the Capital Conservation Buffer.
Please refer to the table below for a summary of our regulatory capital ratios as of December 31, 2023, calculated using the
regulatory capital methodology applicable to us during 2023.
Tier 1 leverage ratio
Risk-based capital ratios:
Tier 1 capital ratio
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio
Total capital ratio
Company Regulatory Capital Ratios
Minimum
Regulatory
Capital Ratio
for the
Company
Minimum
Ratio + Capital
Conservation
Buffer(1)
Well-
Capitalized
Minimum
for the
Company(2)
4.00 %
N/A
N/A
The Company
9.3 %
6.00
4.50
8.00
8.50
7.00
10.50
6.00
N/A
10.00
10.3
9.4
12.1
(1) Reflects the Capital Conservation Buffer of 2.50%.
(2) Reflects the well-capitalized standard applicable to the Company for purposes of the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y. The
Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for BHCs to reflect the higher capital requirements
imposed under the U.S. Basel III Rule or to add Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio and Tier 1 leverage ratio
requirements to this standard. As a result, the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio and Tier 1 leverage ratio are denoted
as “N/A” in this column. If the Federal Reserve were to apply the same or a very similar well-capitalized standard to
BHCs as the standard applicable to our subsidiary banks, the Company’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2023 would
exceed such revised well-capitalized standard.
In addition to the above, as a result of participation in mortgage programs with certain government-sponsored entities as well as
other investors, the Company has specific net worth requirements for continued participation. As of December 31, 2023, the
Company remained in compliance with such requirements.
Payment of Dividends and Share Repurchases
We are a legal entity separate and distinct from our banking and non-banking subsidiaries. Since our consolidated net income
consists largely of net income of our bank and non-bank subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends and repurchase shares
depends upon our receipt of dividends from our subsidiaries. There are various federal and state law limitations on the extent to
which our banking subsidiaries can declare and pay dividends to us, including regulatory capital requirements, general
regulatory oversight to prevent unsafe or unsound practices and federal and state banking law requirements concerning the
payment of dividends out of net profits or surplus. Applicable banking laws also prohibit, without prior regulatory approval,
insured depository institutions, such as our bank subsidiaries, from making dividend distributions if such distributions are not
paid out of available earnings. In addition, our right, and the right of our shareholders and creditors, to participate in any
distribution of the assets or earnings of our bank and non-bank subsidiaries is further subject to the prior claims of creditors of
our subsidiaries. No assurances can be given that the banks will, in any circumstances, pay dividends to the Company.
We and our bank subsidiaries must maintain the applicable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Conservation Buffer to avoid
becoming subject to restrictions on capital distributions, including dividends. The Capital Conservation Buffer is currently at its
fully phased-in level of 2.5%. For more information on the Capital Conservation Buffer, see Capital Ratio Requirements above.
Our ability to declare and pay dividends to our shareholders is similarly limited by federal banking law and Federal Reserve
regulations and policy. Federal Reserve policy provides that a bank holding company should not pay dividends unless (1) the
bank holding company’s net income over the last four quarters (net of dividends paid) is sufficient to fully fund the dividends,
(2) the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the capital needs, asset quality and overall financial
condition of the bank holding company and its subsidiaries and (3) the bank holding company will continue to meet minimum
required capital adequacy ratios. The policy also provides that a bank holding company should inform the Federal Reserve
reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period for which the dividend is being
paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the bank holding company’s capital structure. Bank holding companies
also are required to consult with the Federal Reserve before materially increasing dividends. The Federal Reserve could prohibit
or limit the payment of dividends by a bank holding company if it determines that payment of the dividend would constitute an
unsafe or unsound practice.
12
FDICIA and Prompt Corrective Action
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) requires the federal bank regulatory
agencies to take “prompt corrective action” regarding FDIC-insured depository institutions that do not meet certain capital
adequacy standards. A depository institution’s treatment for purposes of the prompt corrective action provisions depends upon
its level of capitalization and certain other factors. An institution that fails to remain well-capitalized becomes subject to a series
of restrictions that increase in severity as its capital condition weakens. Such restrictions may include a prohibition on capital
distributions, restrictions on asset growth or restrictions on the ability to receive regulatory approval of applications. The
FDICIA also provides for enhanced supervisory authority over undercapitalized institutions, including authority for the
appointment of a conservator or receiver for the institution. In certain instances, a bank holding company may be required to
guarantee the performance of an undercapitalized subsidiary bank’s capital restoration plan.
As of December 31, 2023, each of the Company’s banks was categorized as “well-capitalized” and, in addition, met additional
requirements under the Capital Conservation Buffer.
Enforcement Authority
The federal bank regulatory agencies have broad authority to issue orders to depository institutions and their holding companies
prohibiting activities that constitute violations of law, rule, regulation, or administrative order, or that represent unsafe or
unsound banking practices, as determined by the federal banking agencies. The federal banking agencies also are empowered to
require affirmative actions to correct any violation or practice; issue administrative orders that can be judicially enforced; direct
increases in capital; limit dividends and distributions; restrict growth; assess civil money penalties against institutions or
individuals who violate any laws, regulations, orders, or written agreements with the agencies; order termination of certain
activities of holding companies or their non-bank subsidiaries; remove officers and directors; order divestiture of ownership or
control of a non-banking subsidiary by a holding company; or terminate deposit insurance and appoint a conservator or
receiver.
Safety and Soundness
The federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards relating to
internal controls and information systems, informational security, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit
underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, and compensation, fees and benefits. The guidelines prohibit excessive
compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are
unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder.
Properly managing risks has been identified by regulators as critical to the conduct of safe and sound banking activities and has
become even more important as new technologies, product innovation, and the size and speed of financial transactions have
changed the nature of banking markets. The agencies have identified a spectrum of risks facing banking institutions including,
but not limited to, credit, market, liquidity, operational, legal, and reputational risk. Some of the regulatory pronouncements
have focused on operational risk, which arises from the potential that inadequate information systems, operational problems,
breaches in internal controls, fraud, or unforeseen catastrophes will result in unexpected losses. New products and services,
third-party risk management and cybersecurity are critical sources of operational risk that financial institutions are expected to
address in the current environment. Our subsidiary banks are expected to have active board and senior management oversight;
adequate policies, procedures, and limits; adequate risk measurement, monitoring, and management information systems; and
comprehensive and effective internal controls.
Cross-Guarantee
Under the cross-guarantee provision of the FDIA, insured depository institutions such as our subsidiary banks may be liable to
the FDIC for any losses incurred, or reasonably expected to be incurred, by the FDIC resulting from the default of, or FDIC
assistance to, any other commonly controlled insured depository institution. An FDIC cross-guarantee claim against a
depository institution is superior in right of payment to claims of the holding company and its affiliates against such depository
institution. All of our subsidiary banks are commonly controlled within the meaning of the cross-guarantee provision.
13
Insurance of Deposit Accounts
The deposits of each of our subsidiary banks are insured by the DIF up to the standard maximum deposit insurance amount of
$250,000 per depositor. Each of our subsidiary banks is subject to deposit insurance assessments based on the risk it poses to
the DIF, as determined by the capital category and supervisory category to which it is assigned. The FDIC has authority to raise
or lower assessment rates on insured deposits in order to achieve statutorily required reserve ratios in the DIF and to impose
special additional assessments. There is a risk that our subsidiary banks’ deposit insurance premiums will increase if failures of
insured depository institutions deplete the DIF or if the FDIC were to change its view of the risk that they pose to the DIF.
Extraordinary growth in insured deposits during the first and second quarters of 2020 caused the DIF reserve ratio to decline
below the statutory minimum of 1.35%. On June 21, 2022, the FDIC Board of Directors adopted an Amended Restoration Plan.
The FDIC later adopted a final rule, applicable to all insured depository institutions, to increase initial base deposit insurance
assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points, beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The FDIC
also concurrently maintained the Designated Reserve Ratio (“DRR”) for the DIF at 2% for 2023. The increase in assessment
rate schedules is intended to increase the likelihood that the reserve ratio of the DIF reaches the statutory minimum of 1.35% by
the statutory deadline of September 30, 2028. The new assessment rate schedules will remain in effect unless and until the
reserve ratio meets or exceed 2% in order to support growth in the DIF in progressing toward the FDIC’s long-term goal of 2%
DRR. Progressively lower assessment rate schedules will take effect when the reserve ratio reaches 2%, and again when it
reaches 2.5%.
In November 2023, the FDIC issued a final rule to implement a special assessment to recoup losses to the DIF associated with
bank failures in the first half of 2023. Under the rule, the assessment base for the special assessment is equal to an insured
depository institution’s estimated uninsured deposits reported as of December 31, 2022, adjusted to exclude the first $5 billion
of uninsured deposits. The special assessment for Wintrust was estimated at approximately $34.4 million. This amount was
recorded in the fourth quarter for 2023 and will be paid in eight quarterly installments beginning in June of 2024.
Limits on Loans to One Borrower and Loans to Insiders
Federal banking laws impose limits on the amount of credit a bank can extend to any one person (or group of related persons).
For national banks, this limit includes credit exposures arising from derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, and
securities lending and borrowing transactions.
Applicable banking laws and regulations also place restrictions on loans by FDIC-insured banks and their affiliates to their
directors, executive officers and principal shareholders.
Lending Standards and Guidance
The federal banking agencies have adopted uniform regulations prescribing standards for extensions of credit that are secured
by liens or interests in real estate or made for the purpose of financing permanent improvements to real estate. Under these
regulations, all insured depository institutions, such as our subsidiary banks, must adopt and maintain written policies
establishing appropriate limits and standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens or interests in real estate or are
made for the purpose of financing permanent improvements to real estate. These policies must establish loan portfolio
diversification standards, prudent underwriting standards (including loan-to-value limits) that are clear and measurable, loan
administration procedures, and documentation, approval and reporting requirements. The real estate lending policies must
reflect consideration of the federal bank regulators’ Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies.
14
Anti-Money Laundering Programs
The Bank Secrecy Act (the “BSA”) and USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”) contain anti-money
laundering (“AML”) and financial transparency provisions intended to detect, and prevent the use of the U.S. financial system
for, money laundering and terrorist financing activities. The BSA, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act, requires financial
institutions, including banks, to undertake activities including maintaining an AML program, verifying the identity of
customers, monitoring for and reporting suspicious transactions, reporting on cash transactions exceeding specified thresholds,
and responding to requests for information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies. Each of our subsidiary
banks is subject to the BSA and, therefore, is required to provide its employees with AML training, designate an AML
compliance officer and undergo periodic, independent audits to assess the effectiveness of its AML program. We have
implemented policies, procedures and internal controls that are designed to comply with these AML requirements. In May
2016, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), which is a bureau of the Treasury Department that drafts
regulations implementing the BSA, USA PATRIOT Act and other AML legislation, issued a final rule governing enhanced
customer due diligence (the “CDD rule”). The CDD rule imposed several new obligations on covered financial institutions with
respect to their “legal entity customers,” including corporations, limited liability companies and other similar entities. For each
such customer that opens an account (including an existing customer opening a new account), the covered financial institution
must identify and verify the customer’s “beneficial owners,” who are specifically defined in the CDD rule. The CDD rule
contains an exemption for certain accounts used solely to finance insurance premiums. Bank regulators are focusing their
examinations on AML compliance, and we will continue to monitor and augment, where necessary, our AML compliance
programs. The federal banking agencies are required, when reviewing bank and bank holding company acquisition or merger
applications, to take into account the effectiveness of the AML activities of the applicant.
The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, enacted on January 1, 2021 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, does
not directly impose new requirements on banks, but requires the U.S. Treasury Department to issue National Anti-Money
Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Priorities, and conduct studies and issue regulations that may, over the
next few years, significantly alter some of the due diligence, recordkeeping and reporting requirements that the BSA and USA
PATRIOT Act impose on banks. The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 also contains provisions that promote increased
information-sharing and use of technology, and increases penalties for violations of the BSA and includes whistleblower
incentives, both of which could increase the prospect of regulatory enforcement.
Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or “OFAC,” is responsible for administering
economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries and territories, nationals and others, as defined by
various Executive Orders and Acts of Congress. OFAC-administered sanctions take many different forms. For example,
sanctions may include: (1) restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country or territory, including prohibitions
against direct or indirect imports from and exports to a sanctioned country or territory and prohibitions on U.S. persons
engaging in financial transactions relating to, making investments in, or providing investment-related advice or assistance to, a
sanctioned country or territory; and (2) a blocking of assets in which the government or “specially designated nationals” of the
sanctioned country or territory have an interest, by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including
property in the possession or control of U.S. persons). OFAC also publishes lists of persons and organizations that are subject
to asset blocking sanctions, known as the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. Blocked assets (e.g.,
property and bank deposits) cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC.
Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences.
Protection of Client Information
Data privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations concerning the collection, storage, handling, use, disclosure, transfer,
protection and other processing of client information (including personal information) affect many aspects of the Company’s
business, and are continuing to evolve. Data privacy and cybersecurity are currently areas of considerable legislative and
regulatory attention, with new or modified laws, regulations, rules and standards frequently being adopted and potentially
subject to divergent interpretation or application in a manner that may create inconsistent or conflicting requirements for
businesses.
We are, or may in the future become, subject to a variety of complex federal, state and local laws, regulations, rules and
standards regarding data privacy and cybersecurity, including the privacy and information safeguarding provisions of the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB Act”), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and the amendments adopted by the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, as well as various state laws and regulations. The GLB Act requires a financial
institution to, among other things, disclose its privacy policy to certain customers and, in some circumstances, enables certain
15
customers to opt-out of certain sharing of the customers’ nonpublic personal information with nonaffiliated third persons. The
GLB Act also requires financial institutions to implement a comprehensive information security program that includes
administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information. In
accordance with these requirements, we and each of our banks and operating subsidiaries provide a written privacy notice to
each affected customer when the customer relationship begins and, to the extent required, on an annual basis. As described in
the privacy notice, we endeavor to protect the security of information (including personal information) about our customers,
educate our employees about the importance of protecting customer privacy, and allow affected customers to opt-out of certain
types of information sharing. We and our subsidiaries also require business partners with which we share information
(including personal information) to have adequate security safeguards and to follow the requirements of the GLB Act. The GLB
Act, as interpreted by the federal banking regulators, and state laws and regulations require us to take certain actions, including
providing notice under certain circumstances to affected customers, in the event that sensitive or personal customer information
is compromised. We and/or each of the banks and operating subsidiaries may need to amend our privacy policies and adapt our
internal procedures in the event that these legal requirements, or the regulators’ interpretation of them, change, or if new
requirements are added. Additionally, the federal banking regulators, as well as the SEC and related self-regulatory
organizations, regularly issue guidance regarding cybersecurity that is intended to enhance cyber risk management among
financial institutions.
Data privacy and cybersecurity also are areas of increasing state legislative focus. For example, the California Consumer
Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (collectively, the “CCPA”) applies to covered businesses that
conduct business in California and meet certain revenue or personal information collection thresholds. The CCPA contains
several exemptions, including that many, but not all, requirements of the CCPA are inapplicable to personal information that is
collected, processed, sold or disclosed pursuant to the GLB Act. The CCPA imposes obligations on covered companies, broadly
defines personal information, expands California residents’ rights with respect to personal information, and provides for civil
penalties for violations. The CCPA may be interpreted or applied in a manner inconsistent with our understanding, resulting in
further uncertainty and potentially requiring us to incur additional costs and expenses in an effort to comply with these
requirements. Similar laws may be adopted by other states where we do business, or may in the future do business, with at least
four such laws (in Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut and Utah) having taken effect, or scheduled to take effect, in 2023. In
addition, laws in all 50 U.S. states generally require businesses to provide notice under certain circumstances to consumers
whose personal information has been disclosed as a result of a data breach. Moreover, the federal government has recently
considered, and is currently considering, various proposals for more comprehensive data privacy and cybersecurity legislation,
to which we may be subject if passed.
Like other lenders, the banks and several of our operating subsidiaries use credit bureau data in their underwriting activities.
Use of such data is regulated under the FCRA, and the FCRA also regulates, among other things, reporting information to credit
bureaus, prescreening individuals for credit offers, sharing of information (including personal information) between affiliates,
and using affiliate data for marketing purposes. Similar state laws and regulations may impose additional requirements on us,
the banks and our operating subsidiaries.
Further, in the spring of 2022, the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC adopted a new regulation that, among other things, requires
a banking organization to notify its primary federal regulators as soon as possible and within 36 hours after identifying a
“computer-security incident” that the banking organization believes in good faith is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or
degrade its business or operations in a manner that would, among other things, jeopardize the viability of its operations, result
in customers being unable to access their deposit and other accounts, result in a material loss of revenue, profit or franchise
value, or pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States. The rule also imposes requirements on bank service
providers to notify their affected banking organization customers of certain computer-security incidents.
Violation of these laws, rules, regulations and standards may expose us to regulatory action and private litigation, including
claims for damages and penalties. For more information regarding the risks associated with data privacy and cybersecurity laws
and regulations, see “We are subject to complex and evolving laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations
regarding data privacy and cybersecurity, which could increase the cost of doing business, compliance risks and potential
liability” and “We face cybersecurity risks from cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents that
could result in the disclosure of confidential and other information (including personal information), all of which could
adversely affect our business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure” under Risk Factors in Item 1A.
Broker-Dealer and Investment Adviser Regulation
Wintrust Investments and Great Lakes Advisors are subject to extensive regulation under federal and state securities laws.
Wintrust Investments is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S.
Virgin Islands. Both Wintrust Investments and Great Lakes Advisors are registered as investment advisers with the SEC. In
16
addition, Wintrust Investments is a member of several self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”), including FINRA. In addition to
SEC rules and regulations, the SROs adopt rules, subject to approval of the SEC, that govern all aspects of business in the
securities industry and conduct periodic examinations of member firms. Wintrust Investments is also subject to regulation by
state securities commissions in states in which it conducts business. Wintrust Investments and Great Lakes Advisors are
registered only with the SEC as investment advisers, but certain of their advisory personnel are subject to regulation by state
securities regulatory agencies.
As a result of federal and state registrations and SRO memberships, Wintrust Investments is subject to overlapping schemes of
regulation that cover all aspects of its securities businesses. Such regulations cover uses and safekeeping of clients’ funds;
record-keeping and reporting requirements; supervisory and organizational procedures intended to assure compliance with
securities laws and to prevent improper trading on material nonpublic information; personnel-related matters, including
qualification and licensing of supervisory and sales personnel; limitations on extensions of credit in securities transactions;
clearance and settlement procedures; “suitability” and best interest determinations as to certain customer transactions;
limitations on the amounts and types of fees and commissions that may be charged to customers; and regulation of proprietary
trading activities and affiliate transactions. Violations of the laws and regulations governing a broker-dealer’s actions can result
in censures, fines, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, revocation of licenses or registrations, the suspension or expulsion
from the securities industry of a broker-dealer or its officers or employees, or other similar actions by both federal and state
securities administrators, as well as the SROs.
As a registered broker-dealer, Wintrust Investments is subject to the SEC’s net capital rule as well as the net capital
requirements of the SROs of which it is a member. Net capital rules, which specify minimum capital requirements, are designed
to measure general financial integrity and liquidity and require that at least a minimum amount of net assets be kept in relatively
liquid form. Rules of FINRA and other SROs also impose limitations and requirements on the transfer of member
organizations’ assets. Compliance with net capital requirements may limit the Company’s operations requiring the intensive use
of capital. These requirements restrict the Company’s ability to withdraw capital from Wintrust Investments, which in turn may
limit the Company’s ability to pay dividends, repay debt or redeem or purchase shares of the Company’s own outstanding
stock. Wintrust Investments is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), which subject to certain
limitations, serves to oversee the liquidation of a member brokerage firm, and to return missing cash, stock and other securities
owed to the firm’s brokerage customers, in the event a member broker-dealer fails. The general SIPC protection for customers’
securities accounts held by a member broker-dealer is up to $500,000 for each eligible customer, including a maximum of
$250,000 for cash claims. SIPC does not protect brokerage customers against investment losses. In addition to SIPC coverage,
the clearing firm utilized by Wintrust Investments offers certain insurance coverage. In the event of the clearing firm’s
insolvency, clients whose cash and securities were not fully protected by SIPC may benefit from this additional insurance. The
policy provides coverage to each client up to $1.9 million, subject to an aggregate cap of $1 billion for all policy beneficiaries.
Wintrust Investments and Great Lakes Advisors in their capacities as investment advisers are subject to regulations covering
matters such as transactions between clients, transactions between the adviser and clients, custody of client assets and
management of mutual funds and other client accounts. The principal purpose of regulation and discipline of investment firms
is the protection of customers, clients and the securities markets rather than the protection of creditors and shareholders of
investment firms. Sanctions that may be imposed for failure to comply with laws or regulations governing investment advisers
include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on an adviser’s engaging in various asset management activities for
specified periods of time, the revocation of registrations, other censures and fines.
Incentive Compensation
The federal banking agencies have issued joint guidance on incentive compensation designed to ensure that the incentive
compensation policies of banking organizations, such as us and our subsidiary banks, do not encourage imprudent risk taking
and are consistent with the safety and soundness of the organization. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal
banking agencies and the SEC to issue regulations or guidelines requiring covered financial institutions, including us and our
subsidiary banks, to prohibit incentive-based payment arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing
compensation that is excessive or that could lead to material financial loss to the institution. A proposed rule was issued in
2016. It is unclear when, if ever, the proposed rule will be finalized.
Also pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, in October 2022, the SEC adopted final rules that direct stock exchanges to require listed
companies to implement clawback policies to recover incentive-based compensation from current or former executive officers
in the event of certain financial restatements and require companies to disclose their clawback policies and certain actions under
those policies. The NYSE and NASDAQ filed proposed listing standards on February 22, 2023, and these listing standards
were required to be effective no later November 28, 2023, which the Company met. A listed company must adopt a clawback
policy no later than sixty days following the date on which the applicable listing standard becomes effective and must begin to
17
comply with the final rules disclosure requirements in proxy and information statements and annual reports filed on or after the
effective date of the applicable listing standard.
Human Capital Resources
Since its formation, Wintrust has held the objective of aiming to differentiate itself by offering customers a highly-personalized
banking experience, through staff that is warm, friendly, and responsive. Wintrust expects each of its employees to embody that
original mission by serving as brand ambassadors each day, within each community served by our banks and other business
units.
Workforce Overview
As of December 31, 2023, Wintrust employed 5,521 full-time equivalent employees in the U.S. and Canada. 97% of Wintrust’s
employees are classified as full-time, working greater than 30 hours per week. None of our employees are represented by a
collective bargaining agreement and we consider our employee relations to be good.
Talent Recruiting and Retention
At Wintrust we recognize that attracting, motivating and retaining talent at all levels is vital to continuing our success. In 2023,
Wintrust filled over 1,500 positions, including external hires, internal transfers/promotions, and temporary hires. In 2023, 53%
of our new hires self-identified as female and 41% of our new hires self-identified as a racial or ethnic minority. Wintrust
promotes an employee referral program, which we believe favorably influences colleague retention and engagement. Turnover
for the entire Wintrust enterprise for the year was approximately 14% and of that voluntary departures accounted for
approximately 63% of the total turnover.
Wintrust offers a robust total rewards package that is designed to attract, motivate and retain a talented and diverse group of
employees. In addition to competitive, performance-based compensation plans, we provide employees with comprehensive
benefits packages. Wintrust consistently monitors and adapts its total rewards program design to reflect both market changes
and employee feedback.
Diversity & Inclusion
Wintrust strives to promote an equitable, diverse and inclusive culture where each employee can be successful, and one that is
reflective of the communities we serve. Women currently represent 56% of Wintrust’s workforce. In addition, the racially and
ethnically diverse representation in Wintrust’s workforce is 33%. To further advance diversity and inclusion across Wintrust,
we have taken the following steps:
•
•
•
•
Continued the “shared responsibility in action” theme with Paired To Win: Mentoring, a program launched in 2023
designed to enable access to mentoring for all employees across the enterprise. Over 1,500 Wintrust employees
participated in the inaugural mentoring program and 31% of participants were minorities.
Continued our Paired To Win: Advocacy program, which paired select high-potential protégés with senior executive
advocates. The second cohort launched in 2023, which includes over 72% women and 17% minority mid-level leaders.
The program objective is to accelerate development of leadership opportunities for protégés within one to three years
after launching the partnership. As an outcome of the program, 46% of the proteges from the inaugural cohort have
been promoted.
Continued to offer and support Business Resource Groups (“BRG”) to help foster a sense of belonging and
recognizing the value of creating an inclusive and diverse workplace for our employees. Our BRGs consist of
Leadership Coalition, Multicultural Professionals Network, Career Navigation, Prism, and Women of Wintrust.
Approximately 17% of Wintrust employees have registered as members of one or more BRG.
Continued the 360° Inclusivity Model, a multicultural marketing framework for addressing the unique needs of an
increasingly diverse marketplace by taking inclusive approaches to eradicating financial disparities in the communities
we serve, through enhanced products and services.
18
•
Required each of our business units to update their Diversity & Inclusion Business Unit Action Plan, documenting key
goals and effective efforts towards advancing diversity, equity and inclusion internally and externally in a relevant and
intentional way. The Business Unit Action Plan is updated annually and reviewed by senior leaders and the Board of
Directors.
Learning & Development
We are committed to providing all team members with development opportunities through individual and career development
planning. Our employees have access to approximately 460 Banking topics, 160 Professional Skills topics and 640 customized
training courses and resources through Wintrust University – our learning portal. In 2023, we maintained an online training
catalog containing over 22,000 course offerings for our employees’ personal and professional development and, in 2023,
invested more than 217,000 total hours in training by team members.
We routinely identify and recognize talented employees by performing comprehensive reviews of leadership capability,
readiness, aspiration and succession planning. To support the development of our internal talent pipeline, we have invested in a
number of programs to support the development of future leaders and additional training for senior leaders with strategic
accountability. To support the development of future leaders, over 100 newly minted leaders attended “The Fundamentals of
Wintrust Leadership” program annually in 2023. We also developed the “Leadership Journey”, an eight-phase leadership
development program that supports our leaders at every phase of their advancement.
Annually, Wintrust team members at all levels certify their completion of regulatory training based upon their roles and
responsibilities. They also are encouraged to complete a minimum of two professional development activities each year.
Recognizing that remote work had been successful, productive and beneficial for many colleagues, we continue to support
workplace flexibility where roles, business requirements and customer needs are met. Wintrust’s work model consists of:
•
•
Colleagues who work 100% onsite on a daily basis, based on role, business need, and customer/collaboration impact.
This includes nearly all bank branch staff and lending teams, as well as team members in sales, critical bank
operations, facilities, security, and other functions.
Colleagues permitted to work remotely up to 2 days a week, on a hybrid/flex schedule, in jobs that allow flexibility.
• A limited number of colleagues allowed to work 100% remotely, as their roles permit.
De Novo Branching and De Novo Banks
With the approval of applicable regulators, national banks and state banks may establish de novo branches in states other than
their home state as if such state was the bank’s home state.
For a three-year period, newly chartered banks are subject to enhanced supervisory procedures, including higher capital
requirements, more frequent examinations and other requirements.
Anti-Tying Provisions
Each of our subsidiary banks is prohibited from conditioning the availability of any product or service, or varying the price for
any product or service, on the requirement that the customer obtain some additional product or service from the bank or any of
its affiliates, other than loans, deposits and trust services.
19
Transactions with Affiliates
Certain transactions between a bank and its holding company or other non-bank affiliates are subject to various restrictions
imposed by state and federal law and regulation. Such “covered transactions” include loans and other extensions of credit by the
bank to the affiliate, investments in securities issued by the affiliate, purchases of assets from the affiliate, certain derivative
transactions that create a credit exposure to an affiliate, the acceptance of securities issued by the affiliate as collateral for a
loan, and the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of the affiliate. In general, these affiliate
transaction rules limit the amount of covered transactions between an institution and a single affiliate, as well as the aggregate
amount of covered transactions between an institution and all of its affiliates. In addition, covered transactions that are credit
transactions must be secured by acceptable collateral, and all affiliate transactions, including those that do not qualify as
covered transactions, must be on terms that are at least as favorable to the bank as then-prevailing in the market for comparable
transactions with unaffiliated entities. Transactions between affiliated banks may be subject to certain exemptions under
applicable federal law.
Community Reinvestment Act
Under the CRA, insured depository institutions, including our subsidiary banks, have a continuing and affirmative obligation to
help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not
establish specific lending requirements or programs for insured depository institutions, nor does it limit an insured depository
institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community,
consistent with the CRA. However, insured depository institutions are rated on their performance in meeting the needs of their
communities. The CRA requires each federal banking agency to take an insured depository institution’s CRA record into
account when evaluating certain applications by the insured depository institution or its holding company, including
applications for charters, branches and other deposit facilities, relocations, mergers, consolidations, acquisitions of assets or
assumptions of liabilities, and bank and savings association acquisitions. An unsatisfactory record of performance may be the
basis for denying or conditioning approval of an application by an insured depository institution or its holding company. The
CRA also requires that all institutions publicly disclose their CRA ratings. Each of our subsidiary banks received a
“satisfactory” or better rating from the OCC on its most recent CRA performance evaluation.
On October 24, 2023, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC issued a final rule to amend their regulations implementing the
CRA. The rule materially revises the current CRA framework, including the assessment areas in which a bank is evaluated to
include activities associated with online and mobile banking, the tests used to evaluate the bank in its assessment areas, new
methods of calculating credit for lending, investment and service activities, and additional data collection and reporting
requirements. The rule is expected to result in a significant increase in the thresholds for large banks to receive “Outstanding”
ratings in the future. The rule is expected to take effect on April 1, 2024, with most of the provisions becoming applicable on
January 1, 2026. Reporting of the collected data will not be required until 2027.
Compliance with Consumer Protection Laws
Our subsidiary banks and some other operating subsidiaries are subject to a variety of federal and state statutes and regulations
designed to protect consumers. The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority over a wide range of federal consumer protection
laws that apply to banks and other providers of financial products and services, including the authority to prohibit “unfair,
deceptive or abusive” acts and practices, but examination and supervision is carried out by each subsidiary bank’s primary
federal banking agency and, where applicable, state banking agency, not the CFPB. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes
state attorneys general and other state officials to enforce consumer protection rules issued by the CFPB. State authorities have
recently increased their focus on and enforcement of consumer protection rules.
Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by banks are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning
interest rates.
Loan operations are also subject to federal laws and regulations applicable to credit transactions, such as:
Issued by the CFPB:
•
•
the federal Truth-In-Lending Act and Regulation Z governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one- to
four-family residential real estate receive various disclosures, including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender
servicing and escrow account practices, and prohibiting certain practices that increase the cost of settlement services;
20
•
•
•
•
the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the
public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing
needs of the community it serves;
the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B prohibiting discrimination on the basis of various prohibited factors
in extending credit;
the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V governing the use and provision of information to consumer reporting
agencies; and
the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected
by collection agencies;
Issued by others:
•
•
the Service Members Civil Relief Act, applying to all debts incurred prior to commencement of active military service
(including credit card and other open-end debt) and limiting the amount of interest, including service and renewal charges
and any other fees or charges (other than bona fide insurance) that is related to the obligation or liability; and
the guidance of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.
Deposit operations are subject to, among others:
Issued by the CFPB:
•
•
the Truth in Savings Act and Regulation DD which require disclosure of deposit terms to consumers; and
the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E which governs automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit
accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic
banking services;
Issued by others:
•
•
Regulation CC issued by the Federal Reserve Board, which relates to the availability of deposit funds to consumers; and
the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain the confidentiality of consumer financial records
and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records.
There are consumer protection standards that apply to functional areas of operation rather than applying only to loan or deposit
products. Our subsidiary banks and some other operating subsidiaries are also subject to certain state laws and regulations
designed to protect consumers.
The CFPB has promulgated, and continues to promulgate, many mortgage-related final rules since it was established under the
Dodd-Frank Act, including rules related to the ability to repay and qualified mortgage standards, mortgage servicing standards,
loan originator compensation standards, high-cost mortgage requirements, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requirements and
appraisal and escrow standards for higher priced mortgages. Most of the provisions of these mortgage-related final rules are
currently effective. In addition, several proposed revisions to mortgage-related rules are pending finalization. The mortgage-
related final rules issued by the CFPB have materially restructured the origination, servicing and securitization of residential
mortgages in the United States. These rules have impacted, and will continue to impact, the business practices of mortgage
lenders, including the Company.
In order to ensure compliance with all mortgage-related rules and regulations, the Company consolidated its consumer
mortgage loan origination and loan servicing operations primarily within Wintrust Mortgage. All consumer mortgage
applications are taken through Wintrust Mortgage, which has extensively trained loan originators located at many of our
branches. While in certain limited cases our banks may offer specialized consumer mortgages to our customers, substantially all
consumer mortgages for all of our banks are originated and closed by Wintrust Mortgage. Wintrust Mortgage then sells loans to
third parties or to our banks. To the extent that we retain consumer mortgage loans in our bank portfolios, our banks have
engaged Wintrust Mortgage to provide loan servicing.
In March 2023, the CFPB issued the “Small Business Lending Rule” to implement Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act for the
stated purpose of increasing transparency in small business lending, promoting economic development and combating unlawful
discrimination. Under this rule, covered lenders, including the Company’s bank subsidiaries, are required to collect and report
information about the small business credit applications they receive, including geographic and demographic data, lending
decisions and the price of credit. As finalized, the Small Business Lending Rule requires compliance by covered lenders as
early as October 2024. However, on October 26, 2023, a federal district court issued a nationwide injunction prohibiting the
CFPB from implementing or enforcing the Small Business Lending Rule pending the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in an
appeal of a Fifth Circuit decision finding that the CFPB’s funding structure is unconstitutional. If the Supreme Court reverses
the Fifth Circuit’s finding, the CFPB will be required to extend all compliance deadlines for the Small Business Lending Rule
21
to compensate for the period in which its implementation and enforcement of the rule was stayed by the district court. It is
anticipated that the Company will require a material effort to update its systems and train its lenders to comply with the Small
Business Lending Rule.
In October 2023, the CFPB proposed a rule to implement Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act, sometimes referred to as the
Dodd-Frank Act’s “open banking” provision, which would require certain entities, including the Company and our bank
subsidiaries, to comply with an established framework to govern consumer access to electronic financial data. The Company
continues to monitor this proposal and evaluate the potential impacts, if adopted as proposed or otherwise, on the Company and
our bank subsidiaries.
Changes to consumer protection regulations, including those promulgated by the CFPB, could affect our business but the
likelihood, timing and scope of any such changes and the impact any such change may have on us cannot be determined with
any certainty. See Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Debit Interchange
We are subject to a statutory requirement that interchange fees for electronic debit transactions that are paid to or charged by
payment card issuers, including our bank subsidiaries, be reasonable and proportional to the cost incurred by the issuer.
Interchange fees for electronic debit transactions are limited to 21 cents plus 0.05% of the transaction, plus an additional one
cent per transaction fraud adjustment, impose requirements regarding routing and exclusivity of electronic debit transactions.
On October 3, 2022, the Federal Reserve finalized a rule that amended Regulation II to, among other things, specify that debit
card issuers should enable all debit card transactions, including card-not-present transactions such as online payments, to be
processed on at least two unaffiliated payment card networks. The final rule became effective July 1, 2023. As an issuer with
over $10 billion in assets, we are subject to Regulation II and have incorporated all new requirements as of July 1, 2023.
In October 2023, the Federal Reserve released a notice of proposed rulemaking that would lower the maximum interchange fee
that a large debit card issuer can receive on a debit card transaction. Under the proposal, initially the base component would
decrease from 21.0 cents to 14.4 cents, the ad valorem component would decrease from 5.0 basis points to 4.0 basis points
multiplied by the value of the transaction, and the fraud-prevention adjustment would increase from 1.0 cents to 1.3 cents for
the debit card transactions performed from the effective date of the final rule to June 30, 2025. In addition, the proposal would
adopt an approach for future adjustments to the interchange fee cap, which would occur every other year based on issuer cost
data gathered from large debit card issuers. We will continue to monitor the status of the proposed rule and are in the process
of evaluating this proposed rulemaking and assessing the scale of its adverse impact on the Company and our bank subsidiaries,
if adopted as proposed.
Climate Impact
The Company’s approach in considering its climate impact is currently focused on mitigating the environmental impact of
operations, specifically at its various banking locations; assessing other climate-related risks within the Company’s various
businesses; and providing support to projects and investments that contribute to climate solutions. In 2023, some of the
highlights of this approach included the following:
•
•
•
The Company continued to monitor the climate impact of its various banking locations, including its corporate campus
that consists of three office buildings located in Rosemont, Illinois. In 2023, the corporate campus green house gas
carbon emissions (CO2e) totaled 4,473 tons in 2023 compared to 4,194 tons in 2022.
The Company continued to pursue certain renewable energy solutions as well as efficient building standards and
technologies.
Great Lakes Advisors executes investing through its Climate Opportunities Net Zero Portfolio, a portfolio started in
2013. The portfolio includes investments in solutions for green buildings, renewable energy, sustainable agriculture,
sustainable water, energy efficiency and pollution prevention. At December 31, 2023, this program managed
$102 million in climate-focused portfolios.
Available Information
The Company’s Internet address is www.wintrust.com. The Company makes available at this address, under the “Investor
Relations” tab, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, its annual reports to shareholders, Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
22
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically
filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These filings are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors Summary
The summary of risks below provides an overview of the principal risks we are exposed to in the normal course of our business
activities. This summary does not contain all of the information provided in the detailed discussion of risks that follows this
summary and should be read together with such detailed discussion.
Risks Related to Economic Conditions and Operating Environment
•
Includes risks related to deterioration in economic conditions and economic declines in the Chicago metropolitan and
southern Wisconsin market areas, since our business is concentrated in these regions, and climate change and related
environmental sustainability matters.
Risks Related to Competition and Reputation
•
Includes risks related to our ability to compete effectively, damage to our reputation, consumers deciding not to use
banks to complete their financial transactions and the impact on us from the soundness of other financial institutions.
Risks Related to Growth and Acquisitions
•
Includes risks related to our ability to identify favorable acquisitions or successfully integrate our acquisitions, our
participation in FDIC-assisted acquisitions, new lines of business and new products and services and de novo
operations that often involve significant expenses and delayed returns.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
•
Includes risks related to our ability to meet regulatory capital ratios, changes in the United States’ monetary policy,
legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future regarding the financial services industry, changes in data
privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations, financial reform legislation and increased regulatory rigor around
consumer protection mortgage-related issues, federal, state and local consumer lending laws that may restrict our
ability to originate certain mortgage loans or increase our risk of liability with respect to such loans, regulatory
initiatives regarding bank capital requirements that may require heightened capital, any increase in our FDIC insurance
premiums, any non-compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, BSA or other laws and regulations, claims and legal
actions, examinations and challenges by tax authorities, changes in federal and state tax laws and changes in the
interpretation of existing laws, changes in accounting policies or accounting standards and changes in U.S. trade
policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs.
Risks Related to Lending Operations
•
Includes risks related to our allowance for credit losses and sufficiency to absorb losses that may occur in our loan
portfolio, litigation from the banks’ customers or other parties regarding the banks’ processing of loans for the SBA
Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and that the SBA may invalidate some or all PPP loan guaranties, the
repayment of commercial loans which are largely dependent upon the financial success and economic viability of the
borrower, our loan portfolio being secured by real estate, in particular commercial real estate, events impacting
collateral consisting of real property, any inaccurate assumptions in our analytical and forecasting models and
environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.
Risks Related to Our Niche Businesses
•
Includes risks related to our premium finance business, which may involve a higher risk of delinquency or collection
than our other lending operations, widespread financial difficulties or credit downgrades among commercial and life
insurance providers and exposure to certain risks associated with the securities industry.
Risks Related to Financial Strength and Liquidity
•
Includes risks related to changes in prevailing interest rates, our liquidity position, an actual or perceived reduction in
our financial strength, loss of deposits or a change in deposit mix, our credit rating, capital not being available when it
is needed or the cost of that capital being very high, disruption in the financial markets, and being a bank holding
company and therefore being limited in sources of funds, including to pay dividends.
23
Risks Related to General Operations
•
Includes risks related to our controls and procedures, our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of
third parties, security risks (including cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents and
those associated with debit cards and debit card transactions), the failure of vendors, the accuracy and completeness of
information we receive about our customers and counterparties to make credit decisions, our ability to attract and
retain experienced and qualified personnel, losses incurred in connection with actual or projected repurchases and
indemnification payments related to mortgages that we have sold into the secondary market and the occurrence of
extraordinary events, such as acts of war, terrorist attacks, natural disasters and public health threats.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
•
Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders.
Risk Factors
An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent to our business. Certain material risks and uncertainties that
management believes affect Wintrust are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully
consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC. Additional risks and uncertainties that
management is not aware of or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair Wintrust’s business operations.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually occur,
our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the
value of our securities could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Economic Conditions and Operating Environment
Deterioration in economic conditions may materially adversely affect the financial services industry and our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our business activities and earnings are affected by general business conditions in the United States and abroad, including
factors such as the level and volatility of short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, home prices, unemployment and
underemployment levels, bankruptcies, household income, consumer spending, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital
markets, liquidity of the global financial markets, the availability and cost of capital and credit, investor sentiment and
confidence in the financial markets, and the strength of the domestic economies in which we operate. The deterioration of any
of these conditions can adversely affect our consumer and commercial businesses and securities portfolios, our level of charge-
offs and provision for credit losses, our capital levels and liquidity, and our results of operations.
As a lending institution, our business is directly affected by the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, as well as by the
value of collateral, such as real estate, that secures many of our loans. Any economic deterioration from current levels or
slowing of current economic activity could lead to an increase in loan charge-offs and negatively affect consumer confidence as
well as the level of business activity. Net charge-offs totaled $45.5 million in 2023 from $20.3 million in 2022. Our balance of
non-performing loans and other real estate owned (“OREO”) was $139.0 million and $13.3 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2023 compared to $100.7 million and $9.9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2022. Deterioration in the
economy and real estate markets, higher inflation, rising interest rates or increased unemployment rates, particularly in the
markets in which we operate, will likely diminish the ability of our borrowers to repay loans that we have made to them,
decrease the value of any collateral securing such loans and may cause increases in delinquencies, problem assets, charge-offs
and provision for credit losses, all of which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Further, the underwriting and credit monitoring policies and procedures that we have adopted may not prevent losses that could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A U.S. government debt default or rating downgrade could have a material adverse impact on our business and financial
performance, including a decrease in the value of Treasury bonds and other government securities we hold, which could
negatively impact the banks’ capital position and ability to meet regulatory requirements. Other negative impacts could include
volatile capital markets, an adverse impact on the U.S. economy and the U.S. dollar, as well as increased default rates among
borrowers in light of increased economic uncertainty. Some of these impacts might occur even in the absence of an actual
default by or rating downgrade of the U.S. government but as a consequence of the uncertainty caused by extended political
negotiations around the threat of such a default or rating downgrade and a U.S. government shutdown.
24
Since our business is concentrated in the Chicago metropolitan and southern Wisconsin market areas, economic declines in
the economy of this region could adversely affect our business.
Except for our premium finance business and certain other niche businesses, our success depends primarily on the general
economic conditions of the specific local markets in which we operate. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are
more geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services to customers primarily in the Chicago metropolitan
and southern Wisconsin market areas. The local economic conditions in these areas significantly impact the demand for our
products and services as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the
stability of our deposit funding sources.
In addition, the State of Illinois has experienced significant financial difficulty in recent years. To the extent that these issues
impact the economic vitality of the state and the businesses operating in Illinois, businesses may be encouraged to leave the
state or new employers may be discouraged to start or move businesses to Illinois, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations.
Climate change manifesting as transition, physical or other risks could adversely affect our operations, businesses,
customers, reputation and financial condition.
There is an increasing concern over the risks of climate change and related environmental sustainability matters. The physical
risks of climate change include discrete events, such as flooding, hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires, and longer-term shifts in
climate patterns, such as extreme heat, sea level rise, and more frequent and prolonged drought. Such events could disrupt our
operations or those of our customers or third parties on which we rely, including through direct damage to assets and indirect
impacts from supply chain disruption and market volatility. Additionally, transitioning to a low-carbon economy will entail
extensive policy, legal, technology and market initiatives. Transition risks, including changes in consumer preferences,
additional regulatory requirements or taxes and additional counterparty or customer requirements, could increase our expenses,
undermine our strategies and impact our financial condition.
In addition, our reputation and client relationships may be damaged as a result of our practices related to climate change,
including our involvement, or our clients’ involvement, in certain industries or projects associated with causing or exacerbating
climate change, as well as any decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our activities in response to considerations
relating to climate change. As climate risk is interconnected with all key risk types, we have begun to develop and continue to
enhance processes, to embed climate risk considerations into our risk management strategies established for risks such as
market, credit and operational risks; however, because the timing and severity of climate change may not be predictable, our
risk management strategies may not be effective in mitigating climate risk exposure.
The effects of COVID-19 have adversely impacted our operations and financial performance and could have similar adverse
impacts in future periods.
Although the U.S. and global economies continue to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, certain adverse consequences of
the pandemic, including labor shortages, disruptions of global supply chains and inflationary pressures, could continue to
impact the macroeconomic environment and could adversely affect our business.
Many of our employees continue to work remotely on at least a hybrid basis, which may create increased costs of operations or
other operational difficulties, including increased cybersecurity risk. We may also experience additional operational risk due to
difficulties experienced by our vendors.
Risks Related to Competition and Reputation
The financial services industry is very competitive, and if we are not able to compete effectively, we may lose market share
and our business could suffer.
We face competition in attracting and retaining deposits, making loans, and providing other financial services (including wealth
management services) throughout our market area. Our competitors include national, regional and other community banks, and
a wide range of other financial institutions such as credit unions, government-sponsored enterprises, mutual fund companies,
insurance companies, factoring companies and other non-bank financial companies such as marketplace lenders and other
financial technology companies. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and market presence or more
advanced technology than Wintrust and, as a result of their size, may be able to offer a broader range of products and services,
25
better pricing for those products and services, or newer technologies to deliver those products and services than we can. Several
of our local competitors have experienced improvements in their financial condition over the past few years and are better
positioned to compete for loans, acquisitions and personnel. The financial services industry could become even more
competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. For example, the
Economic Growth Act and its implementing regulations significantly reduce the regulatory burden of certain large BHCs and
raise the asset thresholds at which more onerous requirements apply, which could cause certain large BHCs to become more
competitive or to more aggressively pursue expansion. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for
non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as mobile payment and other automatic transfer
and payment systems, and for banks that do not have a physical presence in our markets to compete for deposits. The absence
of regulatory requirements may give non-bank financial companies a competitive advantage over Wintrust.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the ability to develop, maintain and build upon long-term customer relationships based on top quality service and high
ethical standards;
the scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands;
the ability to expand our market position;
the ability to uphold our reputation in the marketplace;
the rate at which we introduce new products and services relative to our competitors;
customer satisfaction with our level of service; and
industry and general economic trends.
If we are unable to compete effectively, our market share and income from deposits, loans and other products may be reduced.
This could adversely affect our profitability and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Damage to our reputation may harm our business.
Maintaining trust in the Company is critical to our ability to attract and maintain customers, investors and employees. If our
reputation is damaged, our business could be significantly harmed. Harm to our reputation could arise from numerous sources,
including, among others, employee misconduct, security and cybersecurity breaches, compliance failures, litigation or
regulatory outcomes or governmental investigations. Our reputation could also be harmed by the failure or perceived failure of
an affiliate or a vendor or other third party with which we do business, to comply with applicable laws or regulations. In
addition, our reputation or prospects could be significantly damaged by adverse publicity or negative information regarding the
Company, whether or not true, that may be posted on social media, non-mainstream news services or other parts of the internet,
and this risk can be magnified by the speed and pervasiveness with which information is disseminated through those channels.
Actions by the financial services industry generally or by certain members of or individuals in the industry can also affect our
reputation. For example, the role played by financial services firms during and after the financial crisis, including concerns that
consumers have been treated unfairly by financial institutions or that a financial institution had acted inappropriately with
respect to the methods employed in offering products to customers, have damaged the reputation of the industry as a whole.
In addition, increased focus on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues, including without limitation the impact of
climate change or our diversity initiatives, could damage our reputation or prospects if customers, prospective customers,
investors or third parties assigning ESG ratings to the Company are of the opinion that the Company’s practices, including
without limitation our lending practices, are not sufficiently robust from an ESG perspective, or otherwise disagree with the
Company’s practices. Simultaneous, disparate and divergent sentiments on ESG-related matters from multiple stakeholder
groups increase the risk that any action or lack thereof by us on such matters will be perceived negatively by some stakeholders.
Failing to comply with expectations and standards from investors, customers, regulators, policymakers and other stakeholders
regarding ESG-related issues, or taking action in conflict with one or another of those stakeholders’ expectations, could also
lead to a loss of business, adverse publicity, an adverse impact on our reputation, customer complaints or other adverse
consequences.
Should any of these or other events or factors that can undermine our reputation occur, there is no assurance that the additional
costs and expenses that we may need to incur to address the issues giving rise to the damage to our reputation would not
adversely affect our earnings and results of operations, or that damage to our reputation will not impair our ability to retain our
26
existing customers and employees or attract new customers and employees. Harm to our reputation or the reputation of our
industry may also result in greater regulatory or legislative scrutiny, which may lead to changes in laws or regulations that
could constrain our business or operations. Events that result in damage to our reputation may also increase our litigation risk.
Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions, which could adversely affect our business
and results of operations.
Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks
through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank
deposits in brokerage accounts or mutual funds. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and transferring
funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries could result in the loss of fee
income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these
revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We may be adversely impacted by the soundness of other financial institutions.
Adverse developments affecting the overall strength and soundness of other financial institutions, the financial services industry
as a whole and the general economic climate and the U.S. Treasury market could have a negative impact on perceptions about
the strength and soundness of our business even if we are not subject to the same adverse developments. In addition, adverse
developments with respect to third parties with whom we have important relationships could also negatively impact perceptions
about us. These perceptions about us could cause our business to be negatively affected and exacerbate the other risks that we
face.
Wintrust may be impacted by actual or perceived soundness of other financial institutions, including as a result of the financial
or operational failure of a major financial institution, or concerns about the creditworthiness of such a financial institution or its
ability to fulfill its obligations, which can cause substantial and cascading disruption within the financial markets and increased
expenses, including FDIC insurance premiums, and could affect our ability to attract and retain depositors and to borrow or
raise capital. The failure of other banks and financial institutions and the measures taken by governments, businesses and other
organizations in response to these events could adversely impact Wintrust’s business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Wintrust’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial
soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing,
counterparty or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties and routinely execute
transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”),
commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose us
to credit risk as well as market and liquidity risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk
may be exacerbated when collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full
amount due to us. Any such losses could have material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In addition, recent events impacting the banking industry, including the bank failures in early 2023, have resulted in significant
disruption and volatility in the capital markets, reduced current valuation of securities portfolios and bank stocks and decreased
confidence in banks among depositors and other counterparties as well as investors. These events occurred in the context of
rapidly rising interest rates which, among other things, have resulted in unrealized losses in longer duration debt securities and
loans held by banks, increased competition for deposits and potentially increased risk of a recession. A decrease in the supply of
deposits or significant increase in competition for deposits could result in substantial increases in costs to retain and service
deposits. Increased adoption of consumer banking technology can result in reduced deposit retention due to the relevant ease
with which depositors may transfer deposits to a different depository institution in the event that confidence is lost in us or any
of our bank subsidiaries.
27
Risks Related to Growth and Acquisitions
If we are unable to continue to identify favorable acquisitions or successfully integrate our acquisitions, our growth may be
limited and our results of operations could suffer.
In the past, we have completed numerous acquisitions of banks, other financial services related companies and financial
services related assets, including acquisitions of troubled financial institutions, as more fully described below. We expect to
continue to make such acquisitions in the future. Wintrust seeks merger or acquisition partners that are culturally similar, have
experienced management, possess either significant market presence or have potential for improved profitability through
financial management, economies of scale or expanded services. Failure to successfully identify and complete acquisitions may
result in Wintrust achieving slower growth.
The standards by which bank and financial institution acquisitions will be evaluated are currently in flux and some banking
organizations are experiencing delays in the processing of applications. In July 2021, President Biden issued an executive order
on competition that requires the banking agencies to review the standards for bank mergers and the Department of Justice has
announced that it is reviewing its bank merger guidelines. It is expected that these reviews will tighten the standards for bank
mergers and may change how the financial stability factor is evaluated. For instance, the OCC has proposed a policy statement
on the OCC’s substantive approach to evaluating bank mergers under the Bank Merger Act (“BMA”), outlining the general
principles the OCC would apply when reviewing bank merger applications and clarifies how the OCC would consider the
statutory factors under the BMA. The policy statement would also identify certain indicators as generally consistent with OCC
approval, which include, among others, appropriate capital and supervisory ratings, lack of enforcement or fair lending actions,
lack of significant CRA or consumer compliance concerns or significant adverse effect on competition and that the resulting
institution would have total assets less than $50 billion. The Company is assessing the proposal and its possible impact on the
Company’s strategy. In addition, some members of Congress have called for a moratorium of any bank merger and acquisition
of greater than $100 billion in assets. While the Company is still much smaller in asset size than $100 billion, we cannot
exclude the possibility that we may be subject to higher antitrust standards, enhanced scrutiny under the financial stability risk
factor, or have a potential acquisition challenged.
Acquiring other banks, businesses or branches involves various risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including, among
other things:
(1) potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities or asset quality issues of the target company;
(2) failure to adequately estimate the level of loan losses at the target company;
(3) difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of the target company;
(4) potential disruption to our business, including diversion of our management's time and attention;
(5) the possible loss of key employees and customers of the target company;
(6) difficulty in estimating the value of the target company; and
(7) potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may affect the target company.
Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values, and, therefore, some dilution of
Wintrust’s tangible book value and net income per common share may occur as a result of any future acquisitions. In addition,
certain acquisitions may expose us to additional regulatory risks, including from foreign governments. Our ability to comply
with any such regulations will impact the success of any such acquisitions. Furthermore, failure to realize the expected revenue
increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits from an acquisition could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
New lines of business and new products and services are essential to our ability to compete but may subject us to additional
risks.
We continually implement new lines of business and offer new products and services within existing lines of business to offer
our customers a competitive array of products and services. The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid
technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, such as the rapid adoption of
mobile payment platforms. The effective use of technology can increase efficiency and enable financial institutions to better
serve customers and to reduce costs. However, some new technologies needed to compete effectively result in incremental
operating costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology
to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in operations.
Many of our competitors, because of their larger size and available capital, have substantially greater resources to invest in
28
technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be
successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological
change affecting the financial services industry could cause a loss of customers and have a material adverse effect on our
business.
At the same time, there can be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where
the markets for such services are still developing. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products or
services, we may invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of
business and/or new products or services may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible.
External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also
impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of
business and/or new product or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls.
Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or
services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
De novo operations often involve significant expenses and delayed returns and may negatively impact Wintrust's
profitability.
Our financial results have been and will continue to be impacted by our strategy of branch openings and de novo bank
formations. We expect to increase the opening of additional branches and may, under certain circumstances, resume de novo
bank formations. It may take longer than expected or more than the amount of time Wintrust has historically experienced for
new banks and/or banking facilities to reach profitability, and there can be no guarantee that these branches or banks will ever
be profitable. Moreover, the FDIC's enhanced supervisory period for de novo banks of three years, including higher capital
requirements during this period, could also delay a new bank's ability to contribute to the Company's earnings and impact the
Company's willingness to expand through de novo bank formation. To the extent we undertake additional de novo bank, branch
and business formations, our level of reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets will be
impacted by startup costs associated with such operations, and it is likely to continue to experience the effects of higher
expenses relative to operating income from the new operations. These expenses may be higher than we expected or than our
experience has shown, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
If we fail to meet our regulatory capital ratios, we may be forced to raise capital or sell assets.
As a banking institution, we are subject to regulations that require us to maintain certain capital ratios, such as the ratio of our
Tier 1 capital to our risk-based assets, and in recent years these regulatory and market expectations have increased substantially.
If our regulatory capital ratios decline, as a result of decreases in the value of our loan portfolio or otherwise, we may be
required to improve such ratios by either raising additional capital or by disposing of assets. If we choose to dispose of assets,
we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so at prices that we believe to be appropriate, and our future operating results
could be negatively affected. If we choose to raise additional capital, we may accomplish this by selling additional shares of
common stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock, which could significantly dilute the ownership
percentage of holders of our common stock and cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Additionally, events or
circumstances in the capital markets generally may increase our capital costs and impair our ability to raise capital at any given
time.
Changes in the United States’ monetary policy may restrict our ability to conduct our business in a profitable manner.
Our ability to profitably operate is dependent, in part, upon federal fiscal policies that cannot be predicted. We are particularly
affected by the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve, which influence money supply in the United States. Any change in the
United States’ monetary policy, or worsening federal budgetary pressures, could affect our access to capital. Additionally, any
trend toward inflation, economic decline, destabilizing of financial markets, or other factors beyond our control may
significantly affect consumer demand for our products and consumers’ ability to repay loans, reducing our results of operations.
The Federal Reserve raised interest rates significantly and continued to shrink its assets during 2023 in response to persistently
high inflation measures that were well above the Federal Reserve’s two percent target. While the Federal Reserve has indicated
that it may seek to lower interest rates in the near term during 2024, the range of potential rate paths over the coming year is
wide and likely will ultimately be driven by the path of inflation, labor market performance and economic growth. Sustained
higher interest rates and continued Federal Reserve asset reductions may adversely affect market stability, market liquidity, and
29
our financial performance and condition. We cannot predict the nature or timing of future changes in monetary policies, or the
precise effects that future changes in monetary policies may have on our activities and financial results.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future regarding the financial services industry may significantly
increase our costs or limit our ability to conduct our business in a profitable manner.
We are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. The cost of compliance with such laws and regulations
can be substantial and adversely affect our ability to operate profitably. While we are unable to predict the scope or impact of
any potential legislation or regulatory action until it becomes final, it is possible that changes in applicable laws, regulations or
interpretations thereof could significantly increase our regulatory compliance costs, impede the efficiency of our internal
business processes, negatively impact the recoverability of certain of our recorded assets, require us to increase our regulatory
capital, interfere with our executive compensation plans, or limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient
manner including our plan for de novo growth and growth through acquisitions.
Both the scope of the laws and regulations and the intensity of the supervision to which our business is subject have increased
in recent years, in response to the financial crisis as well as other factors such as technological and market changes.
Regulatory enforcement and fines have also increased across the banking and financial services sector. Many of these changes
have occurred as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations, most of which are now in place. We expect
that our business will remain subject to extensive regulation and supervision.
In addition, we expect that the Biden Administration will continue to seek to implement a regulatory reform agenda. This
reform agenda could include a heightened focus on the regulation of loan portfolios and credit concentrations to borrowers
impacted by climate change, heightened scrutiny on BSA and AML requirements, topics related to social equity, executive
compensation, and increased capital and liquidity, as well as limits on share buybacks and dividends. In addition, mergers and
acquisitions could be dampened by increased antitrust scrutiny. We also expect reform proposals for the short-term wholesale
markets. At this time, we are unable to assess which, or to what extent, these policies will continue to be implemented and what
their impact on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations would be. Moreover, uncertainty as to the
outcome of national elections in late 2024 increases the risk of uncertainty as to whether regulatory reform will continue.
We are subject to complex and evolving laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data
privacy and cybersecurity, which could increase the cost of doing business, compliance risks and potential liability.
We are subject to complex and evolving laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data privacy
and cybersecurity, including in relation to the personal information of customers, employees or others, and any failure to
comply with these laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations could expose us to liability and/or reputational
damage. As data privacy and cybersecurity risks for banking organizations and the broader financial system have significantly
increased in recent years, data privacy and cybersecurity issues have become the subject of increasing legislative and regulatory
focus. As new data privacy and cybersecurity-related laws, regulations, rules and standards are implemented, the time and
resources needed for us to comply with such laws, regulations, rules and standards as well as our potential liability for non-
compliance and reporting obligations in the case of cyber-attacks, information security breaches or other similar incidents, may
significantly increase. Compliance with these laws, regulations, rules and standards may require us to change our policies,
procedures and technology, which could, among other things, make us more vulnerable to operational failures and to monetary
penalties for breach of such laws, regulations, rules and standards.
In addition to various data privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations already in place, U.S. states are increasingly adopting
laws and regulations imposing comprehensive data privacy and cybersecurity obligations, which may be more stringent,
broader in scope, or offer greater individual rights, with respect to personal information than federal or other state laws and
regulations, and such laws and regulations may differ from each other, which may complicate compliance efforts and increase
compliance costs. Certain aspects of federal and state laws and regulations relating to data privacy and cybersecurity, as well as
their enforcement, remain unclear, and we may be required to modify our practices in an effort to comply with them.
Further, while we strive to publish and prominently display privacy policies that are accurate, comprehensive, and compliant
with applicable laws, regulations, rules and industry standards, we cannot ensure that our privacy policies and other statements
regarding our practices will be sufficient to protect us from claims, proceedings, liability or adverse publicity relating to data
privacy or cybersecurity. Although we endeavor to comply with our privacy policies, we may at times fail to do so or be alleged
to have failed to do so. The publication of our privacy policies and other documentation that provide promises and assurances
about data privacy and cybersecurity can subject us to potential federal or state action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair,
30
or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Additional risks could arise in connection with any failure or perceived failure by
us, our service providers or other third parties with which we do business to provide adequate disclosure or transparency to our
customers about the personal information collected from them and its use, to receive, document or honor the privacy
preferences expressed by our customers, to protect personal information from unauthorized disclosure, or to maintain proper
training on privacy practices for all employees or third parties who have access to personal information in our possession or
control.
Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with our privacy policies, or applicable data privacy and cybersecurity laws,
regulations, rules, standards or contractual obligations, or any compromise of security that results in unauthorized access to, or
unauthorized loss, destruction, use, modification, acquisition, disclosure, release or transfer of personal information, may result
in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices, the expenditure of substantial costs, time and other resources,
proceedings or actions against us, legal liability, governmental investigations, enforcement actions, claims, fines, judgments,
awards, penalties, sanctions and costly litigation (including class actions). Any of the foregoing could harm our reputation,
distract our management and technical personnel, increase our costs of doing business, adversely affect the demand for our
products and services, and ultimately result in the imposition of liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information regarding data privacy and cybersecurity laws
and regulations, see “Protection of Client Information” under Supervision and Regulation in Item 1.
Financial reform legislation and increased regulatory rigor around consumer protection and mortgage-related issues may
reduce our ability to market our products to consumers and may limit our ability to profitably operate our mortgage
business.
The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority over a wide range of federal consumer protection laws applicable to the business of
our subsidiary banks and some other operating subsidiaries, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive”
acts and practices, but examination and supervision of our subsidiary banks is carried out by the primary federal banking
agency and, where applicable, state banking agencies. Consumer protection is an area of significantly heightened regulatory
focus, and the CFPB has promulgated a number of specific regulatory requirements and regulatory guidance in this area. These
actions have increased and may further increase the costs of doing business for all market participants, including our
subsidiaries.
In particular, the mortgage-related rules issued by the CFPB have materially restructured the origination, servicing and
securitization of residential mortgages in the United States. These rules have impacted, and will continue to impact, the business
practices of mortgage lenders, including the Company. For example, in order to ensure compliance with mortgage-related rules
issued by the CFPB, the Company consolidated its consumer mortgage loan origination and loan servicing operations within
Wintrust Mortgage.
The CFPB and federal and state banking agencies also closely examine the mortgage and mortgage servicing activities of
depository financial institutions. Should these or other agencies have serious concerns with respect to our operations in this
regard, the effect of such concerns could have a material adverse effect on our profits.
31
Federal, state and local consumer lending laws may restrict our ability to originate certain mortgage loans or increase our
risk of liability with respect to such loans and could increase our cost of doing business.
Federal, state and local laws have been adopted that are intended to eliminate certain lending practices considered “predatory.”
These laws prohibit practices such as steering borrowers away from more affordable products, selling unnecessary insurance to
borrowers, repeatedly refinancing loans and making loans without a reasonable expectation that the borrowers will be able to
repay the loans irrespective of the value of the underlying property. The CFPB has promulgated many mortgage-related rules
since it was established under the Dodd-Frank Act, including rules relating to the ability to repay loans and relating to qualified
mortgage standards. Most of these mortgage-related rules have been adopted, although portions of certain of these rules have
not yet become effective. In addition, several proposed revisions to mortgage-related rules are pending finalization. We may
find it necessary to tighten our mortgage loan underwriting standards in response to the CFPB rules, which may constrain our
ability to make loans consistent with our business strategies. It is our policy not to make predatory loans and to determine
borrowers' ability to repay, but the law and related rules create the potential for increased liability with respect to our lending
and loan investment activities. They increase our cost of doing business and, ultimately, may prevent us from making certain
loans and cause us to reduce the average percentage rate or the points and fees on loans that we do make. In addition, regulation
related to redlining, fair lending, CRA compliance and BSA compliance create significant burdens which necessitate increased
costs. Any failure to comply with any of these regulations could have a significant impact on our ability to operate, our ability
to acquire or open new banks and/or result in meaningful fines.
Regulatory initiatives regarding bank capital requirements may require heightened capital.
The U.S. Basel III Rule, as well as other aspects of current or proposed regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to
banking organizations, have increased our compliance costs, impacted the profitability of our business activities and may
change certain of our business practices, including the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make
loans, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads, and could expose us to additional costs, including increased compliance costs.
These changes also may require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes to
operations in order to comply, and could therefore also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our ability to engage in capital distributions, including paying dividends or repurchasing stock, may be restricted if we do not
maintain the required Capital Conservation Buffer. In addition, we anticipate that our pro forma capital ratios will be an
important factor considered by the Federal Reserve in evaluating whether proposed payments of dividends or stock repurchases
are consistent with its prudential expectations. For more information regarding capital requirements, see “Capital Requirements
of the Company and Subsidiary Banks” under Supervision and Regulation in Item 1.
Our FDIC insurance premiums may increase, or the FDIC could adopt additional special assessments, either of which
could negatively impact our results of operations.
The Dodd-Frank Act and FDIC regulations use an assessment base for federal deposit insurance premiums based on average
total consolidated assets less average tangible capital. There is a risk that the banks’ deposit insurance premiums will increase in
the future if failures of insured depository institutions once again deplete the DIF. Additionally, to recoup losses to the DIF
resulting from the bank failures of 2023, the FDIC also adopted a special assessment that will become effective in 2024 and will
be collected over eight quarterly assessment periods. There is a risk that the FDIC could adopt additional special assessments in
the future to recoup future DIF losses. Either of these events could negatively impact our financial condition and results of
operations. For more information regarding the most recent increase to the banks’ deposit insurance premiums, see “Insurance
of Deposit Accounts” under Supervision and Regulation in Item 1.
Non-compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, BSA or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions.
The USA PATRIOT Act and the BSA require financial institutions to develop risk-based compliance programs designed to
prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering, the funding of terrorist activities or other illicit finance
activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with FinCEN. The
BSA and its implementing regulations require covered financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and
verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new accounts. Failure to comply with the BSA and its implementing
regulations could result in fines or sanctions. An increasing number of banking institutions have received large fines for non-
compliance with the BSA and its implementing regulations. Although we have developed policies and procedures designed to
32
assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance can be given that these policies and procedures will be
effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations.
We are subject to claims and legal actions that could negatively affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Periodically, as a result of our normal course of business, we are involved in claims and related litigation from our customers,
employees or other parties. These claims and legal actions, whether meritorious or not, as well as reviews, investigations and
proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies could involve large monetary claims and significant legal expense.
In addition, such actions may negatively impact our reputation in the marketplace and lessen customer demand. If such claims
and legal actions are not decided in Wintrust's favor, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
impacted.
We are subject to examinations and challenges by tax authorities that may impact our financial results.
In the normal course of business, we, as well as our subsidiaries, are routinely subject to examinations from federal and state tax
authorities regarding the amount of taxes due in connection with investments we have made and the businesses in which we
have engaged. Recently, federal and state tax authorities have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken
by financial institutions. These tax positions may relate to among other things tax compliance, sales and use, franchise, gross
receipts, payroll, property and income tax issues, including tax base, apportionment and tax credit planning. The challenges
made by tax authorities may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of
income among tax jurisdictions. If any such challenges are made and are not resolved in our favor, they could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in federal and state tax laws and changes in interpretation of existing laws can impact our financial results.
Given the changing economic and political environment and ongoing budgetary pressures, the enactment of further new federal
or state tax legislation may occur. The enactment of such legislation, or changes in the interpretation of existing law, including
provisions impacting tax rates, apportionment, consolidation or combination, income, expenses, credits and exemptions may
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in accounting policies or accounting standards could materially adversely affect how we report our financial
results and financial condition.
Our accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our financial results and financial condition. Some of these policies
require use of estimates and assumptions that affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Some of our
accounting policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about
matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different
conditions or using different assumptions. If such estimates or assumptions underlying our financial statements are incorrect,
we may experience material losses. From time to time, the FASB and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting
standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and could materially
impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply
a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.
Changes in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
There continues to be discussion and dialogue in the U.S. government regarding potential changes to U.S. trade policies,
legislation, treaties and tariffs, including trade policies and tariffs affecting other countries, including China, the European
Union, Canada and Mexico and retaliatory tariffs by such countries. Tariffs and retaliatory tariffs have been imposed, and
additional tariffs and retaliatory tariffs have been proposed. Additionally, the U.S. government has imposed certain economic
sanctions and trade restrictions against certain other countries, and could impose additional sanctions and trade restrictions.
Such tariffs, retaliatory tariffs, sanctions or other trade restrictions on products and materials that our customers import or
export could cause the prices of our customers’ products to increase, which could reduce demand for such products, or reduce
our customers’ margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results and ability to service debt. This in turn, could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, to the extent changes in the political environment
have a negative impact on us or on the markets in which we operate our business, results of operations and financial condition
could be materially and adversely impacted. It remains unclear what the U.S. government or foreign governments will or will
33
not do with respect to tariffs already imposed, additional tariffs that may be imposed, or international trade agreements and
policies.
Risks Related to Lending Operations
If our allowance for credit losses is not sufficient to absorb losses that may occur in our loan portfolio, our financial
condition and liquidity could suffer.
We maintain an allowance for credit losses that is intended to absorb expected lifetime credit losses related to our loan
portfolio, off-balance sheet credit exposures and held-to-maturity debt securities portfolio. At each balance sheet date, our
management determines the amount of the allowance for credit losses based on our estimate of expected credit losses over the
life of the related asset with consideration of historical credit losses, current economic conditions and reasonable and
supportable forecasts.
Because our allowance for credit losses represents an estimate of lifetime losses, there is no certainty that it will be adequate
over time to cover credit losses in the portfolios, particularly if there are changes in expectations of general economic or market
conditions, or events that adversely affect specific customers. In 2023, we charged off $45.5 million in loans (net of recoveries)
and increased our allowance for credit losses from $357.9 million at December 31, 2022 to $427.6 million at December 31,
2023. Our allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses represented 1.01% and 0.91% of total loans
outstanding at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Although we believe our allowance for credits losses is adequate to absorb estimated credit losses in our loan portfolio, if our
estimates are inaccurate and our actual credit losses exceed the amount that is anticipated, or if the forecasts and assumptions
used in calculating our reserves are significantly different from those we actually experience, our financial condition and
liquidity could be materially adversely affected.
For more information regarding our allowance for loan losses, see “Loan Portfolio and Asset Quality” under Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7.
As a participating lender in the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), the Company and its banks are subject to
additional risks of litigation from the banks’ customers or other parties regarding the banks’ processing of loans for the
PPP and risks that the SBA may invalidate some or all PPP loan guaranties.
From April 3, 2020 through the end of the program in the second quarter of 2021, we originated over 19,400 PPP loans with a
carrying balance totaling approximately $4.8 billion. As of December 31, 2023, the carrying balance of such loans was reduced
to approximately $11.5 million primarily resulting from forgiveness by the SBA. The PPP program expired on May 31, 2021.
Although the remaining carrying balance of our PPP loans is relatively low, there remains a risk that the Company and its banks
could be subject to risks of litigation from the banks’ customers or other parties regarding the PPP loans, as well as risks that
the SBA may invalidate some or all PPP loan guaranties and seek recoupment.
Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP related litigation could have a material adverse
impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, participating banks also have credit risk with
respect to PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which the loan was
originated, funded, or serviced by the banks, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan, which
may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP. In the event of a
loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which a
PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by the Company, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the
amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from the
Company.
A significant portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, the repayment of which is largely dependent
upon the financial success and economic viability of the borrower.
The repayment of our commercial loans is dependent upon the financial success and viability of the borrower. If the economy
weakens for a prolonged period or experiences deterioration or if the industry or market in which the borrower operates
weakens, our borrowers may experience depressed or dramatic and sudden decreases in revenues that could hinder their ability
34
to repay their loans. Our commercial loan portfolio totaled $12.8 billion or 30% of our total loan portfolio, at December 31,
2023, compared to $12.5 billion, or 32% of our total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2022.
Commercial loans are secured by different types of collateral related to the underlying business, such as accounts receivable,
inventory and equipment. Should a commercial loan require us to foreclose on the underlying collateral, the unique nature of
the collateral may make it more difficult and costly to liquidate, thereby increasing the risk to us of not recovering the principal
amount of the loan. Accordingly, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely
affected by defaults in this portfolio.
A substantial portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, in particular commercial real estate. Deterioration in the
real estate markets could lead to additional losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
As of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately 35% and 34%, respectively, of our total loan portfolio was secured by
real estate, the majority of which is commercial real estate. The commercial and residential real estate markets continue to
experience a variety of difficulties, including the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin, in which a majority of our
real estate loans are concentrated. Continued uncertainty in economic conditions may impair a borrower’s business operations,
slow the execution of new leases and lead to existing lease turnover. As a result of these factors, vacancy rates for retail, office
and industrial space may increase, and hotel occupancy rates may decline. High vacancy and lower occupancy rates could also
result in rents falling. The combination of these factors could result in the deterioration in the fundamentals underlying the
commercial real estate market and the deterioration in value of some of our loans. Any such deterioration could adversely affect
the ability of our borrowers to repay the amounts due under their loans. Specifically, the office property segment, which
represents 3.45% of our total loan portfolio, is undergoing a structural shift given the rise of a remote work environment,
resulting in heightened vacancies and potentially reduced leasing needs. It is anticipated that this heightened risk environment
for the office segment may take several years to resolve. Increases in commercial and consumer delinquency levels or declines
in real estate market values would require increased net charge-offs and increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, any formal or informal action by our regulatory supervisors may require us to take increased reserves on these
loans and could affect our share price. As a result of the risks associated with commercial real estate, banking regulators give
greater scrutiny to lenders with a high concentration of commercial real estate in their portfolios, and such lenders are expected
to implement stricter underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as maintain
higher capital levels and loss allowances. Concentrations in commercial real estate are monitored by regulatory agencies and
subject to especially heightened scrutiny both on a public and confidential basis. Regulators may require banks to maintain
elevated levels of capital or liquidity due to commercial real estate concentrations, especially if there is a downturn in our local
real estate markets.
Events impacting collateral consisting of real property could lead to additional losses which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Many of the loans in our portfolio are secured by real estate located in the Chicago metropolitan area. Any declines in economic
conditions, including inflation, recession, unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors impacting these local
markets could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Deterioration in the
real estate markets where collateral for our mortgage loans is located could adversely affect the borrower's ability to repay the
loan and the value of the collateral securing the loan, and in turn the value of our assets. In addition, any natural disasters or
severe weather events have the potential to damage our real estate collateral. Climate change could have an impact on longer-
term natural weather trends and increase the occurrence and severity of such adverse weather events.
Any inaccurate assumptions in our analytical and forecasting models could cause us to miscalculate our projected revenue,
capital, liquidity or losses, which could adversely affect our financial condition.
We use analytical and forecasting models to estimate the effects of economic conditions on our loan portfolio and probable loan
performance. Those models reflect certain assumptions about market forces, including interest rates and consumer behavior that
may be incorrect. If our analytical and forecasting models’ underlying assumptions are incorrect, improperly applied, or
otherwise inadequate, we may suffer deleterious effects such as higher than expected loan losses, lower than expected net
interest income, lower than expected liquidity, lower than expected capital or unanticipated charge-offs, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
35
We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.
A significant portion of the Company's loan portfolio is secured by real property. In the ordinary course of business, the
Company may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic
substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, the Company may be liable for
remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. In addition, we own and operate a number of properties
that may be subject to similar environmental liability risks.
Environmental laws may require the Company to incur substantial expenses and could materially reduce the affected property's
value or limit the Company's ability to use or sell the affected property. The costs associated with investigation and remediation
activities could be substantial. In addition, if we are the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, we may be subject to
common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from
the property. Although the Company has policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any
foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The
remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Niche Businesses
Our premium finance business may involve a higher risk of delinquency or collection than our other lending operations,
and could expose us to losses.
We provide financing for the payment of property and casualty insurance premiums and life insurance premiums on a national
basis through FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance, respectively, and financing for the payment of property and
casualty insurance premiums in Canada through our wholly-owned subsidiary, FIFC Canada. Property and casualty insurance
premium finance loans involve a different, and possibly higher, risk of delinquency or collection than life insurance premium
finance loans and the loan portfolios of our bank subsidiaries because these loans are issued primarily through relationships
with a large number of unaffiliated insurance agents and because the borrowers are located nationwide. As a result, risk
management and general supervisory oversight may be difficult. As of December 31, 2023, we had $6.9 billion of property and
casualty insurance premium finance loans outstanding, of which $6.0 billion related to the Company's U.S. operations at FIRST
Insurance Funding and $920.4 million related to the Company's Canadian operations at FIFC Canada. Together, these loans
represented 16% of our total loan portfolio as of such date.
FIRST Insurance Funding and FIFC Canada have in the past been susceptible to, and may in the future be more susceptible to
third party fraud with respect to property and casualty insurance premium finance loans because these loans are originated and
many times funded through relationships with unaffiliated insurance agents and brokers. Acts of fraud are difficult to detect and
deter, and we cannot assure investors that our risk management procedures and controls will prevent losses from fraudulent
activity.
Wintrust Life Finance may be exposed to the risk of loss in our life insurance premium finance business because of fraud.
While Wintrust Life Finance maintains a policy prohibiting the known financing of stranger-originated life insurance and has
established procedures to identify and prevent the company from financing such policies, Wintrust Life Finance cannot be
certain that it will never provide loans with respect to such a policy. In the event such policies were financed, a carrier could
potentially put at risk the cash surrender value of a policy, which serves as Wintrust Life Finance's primary collateral, by
challenging the validity of the insurance contract for lack of an insurable interest.
See the below risk factor “Widespread financial difficulties or credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance
providers could lessen the value of the collateral securing our premium finance loans and impair the financial condition and
liquidity of FIRST Insurance Funding, Wintrust Life Finance and FIFC Canada” for a discussion of further risks associated
with our insurance premium finance activities.
While FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance are licensed as required and carefully monitor compliance with
regulation of each of their businesses, there can be no assurance that either will not be negatively impacted by material changes
in the regulatory environment. FIFC Canada is not required to be licensed in most provinces of Canada, but there can be no
assurance that future regulations which impact the business of FIFC Canada will not be enacted.
36
Additionally, to the extent that affiliates of insurance carriers, banks, and other lending institutions add greater service and
flexibility to their financing practices in the future, our competitive position and results of operations could be adversely
affected. Wintrust Life Finance's life insurance premium finance business could be materially negatively impacted by changes
in the federal or state estate tax provisions. There can be no assurance that FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance
will be able to continue to compete successfully in its markets.
Widespread financial difficulties or credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance providers could lessen the
value of the collateral securing our premium finance loans and impair the financial condition and liquidity of FIRST
Insurance Funding, Wintrust Life Finance and FIFC Canada.
FIRST Insurance Funding, Wintrust Life Finance and FIFC Canada's premium finance loans are primarily secured by the
insurance policies financed by the loans. These insurance policies are written by a large number of geographically dispersed
insurance companies. Our premium finance receivables balances finance insurance policies that are spread among a large
number of insurers; however, one of the insurers represents approximately 11% of such balances and two additional insurers
represent approximately 6% each of such balances. FIRST Insurance Funding, Wintrust Life Finance and FIFC Canada
consistently monitor carrier ratings and financial performance of our carriers. While FIRST Insurance Funding, Wintrust Life
Finance and FIFC Canada can mitigate risks as a result of this monitoring to the extent that commercial or life insurance
providers experience widespread difficulties or credit downgrades, the value of our collateral will be reduced. FIRST Insurance
Funding, Wintrust Life Finance and FIFC Canada are also subject to the possibility of insolvency of insurance carriers in the
commercial and life insurance businesses that are in possession of our collateral. If one or more large nationwide insurers were
to fail, the value of our portfolio could be significantly negatively impacted. A significant downgrade in the value of the
collateral supporting our premium finance business could impair our ability to create liquidity for this business, which, in turn
could negatively impact our ability to expand.
Our wealth management business in general, and Wintrust Investments’ brokerage operation, in particular, exposes us to
certain risks associated with the securities industry.
Our wealth management business in general, and Wintrust Investments' brokerage operations in particular, present special risks
not borne by community banks that focus exclusively on community banking. For example, the brokerage industry is subject to
fluctuations in the stock market that may have a significant adverse impact on transaction fees, customer activity and
investment portfolio gains and losses. Likewise, additional or modified regulations may adversely affect our wealth
management operations. Each of our wealth management operations is dependent on a small number of professionals whose
departure could result in the loss of a significant number of customer accounts. A significant decline in fees and commissions or
trading losses suffered in the investment portfolio could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, we are subject to
claim arbitration risk arising from customers who claim their investments were not suitable or that their portfolios were
inappropriately traded. These risks increase when the market, as a whole, declines. The risks associated with retail brokerage
may not be supported by the income generated by our wealth management operations.
Risks Related to Financial Strength and Liquidity
Changes in prevailing interest rates could adversely affect our net interest income, which is our largest source of income.
We are exposed to interest rate risk in our core banking activities of lending and deposit taking, since changes in prevailing
interest rates affect the value of our assets and liabilities. Such changes may adversely affect our net interest income, which is
the difference between interest income and interest expense. Our net interest income is affected by the fact that assets and
liabilities reprice at different times and by different amounts as interest rates change. Net interest income represents our largest
component of net income, and was $1.8 billion and $1.5 billion for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Each of our businesses may be affected differently by a given change in interest rates. For example, we expect that the results of
our mortgage banking business in selling loans into the secondary market could be negatively impacted during periods of rising
interest rates, whereas falling interest rates could have a negative impact on the net interest spread earned on deposits as we
would be unable to lower the rates on many interest bearing deposit accounts of our customers to the same extent as many of
our higher yielding asset classes.
Additionally, increases in interest rates may adversely influence the growth rate of loans and deposits, the quality of our loan
portfolio, loan and deposit pricing, the volume of loan originations in our mortgage banking business and the value that we can
recognize on the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market.
37
In response to inflationary forces in 2023, the Federal Reserve raised its target for the federal funds rate several times,
beginning from a range of 4.25-4.50% and ending at a range of 5.25-5.5% at year end. Though we expect the Federal Reserve
to slow the rate of increases, we cannot predict the nature or timing of future changes in monetary policies or the precise effects
that they may have on our activities and financial results. For more discussion of this issue, see the above risk factor “Changes
in the United States’ monetary policy may restrict our ability to conduct our business in a profitable manner.”
We seek to mitigate our interest rate risk through several strategies, which may not be successful. With the relatively low
interest rates that prevailed in recent years, we were able to augment the total return of our investment securities portfolio by
selling call options on fixed-income securities that we own. We recorded fee income of approximately $21.9 million, $14.1
million and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We also mitigate our interest rate
risk by entering into interest rate swaps and other interest rate derivative contracts from time to time with counterparties. To the
extent that the market value of any derivative contract moves to a negative market value, we are subject to loss if the
counterparty defaults. In the future, there can be no assurance that such mitigation strategies will be available or successful or
that we will be successful in implementing any new mitigation strategies necessary to address the current rising interest rate
environment. In addition, transactions entered into as part of mitigation strategies employed to mitigate risks associated with a
prolonged low interest rate environment could be less beneficial or result in losses if interest rates continue to rise.
Our liquidity position may be negatively impacted if economic conditions do not improve or if they decline.
Liquidity is a measure of whether our cash flows and liquid assets are sufficient to satisfy current and future financial
obligations, such as demand for loans, deposit withdrawals and operating costs. Our liquidity position is affected by a number
of factors, including the amount of cash and other liquid assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity
instruments that we have issued, capital we inject into our bank subsidiaries, proceeds we raise through the issuance of
securities, our ability to draw upon our revolving credit facility and dividends received from our banking subsidiaries. Our
future liquidity position may be adversely affected by multiple factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
if our banking subsidiaries report net losses or their earnings are weak relative to our cash flow needs;
if it is necessary for us to make capital injections to our banking subsidiaries;
if changes in regulations require us to maintain a greater level of capital, as more fully described below;
if we are unable to access our revolving credit facility due to a failure to satisfy financial and other covenants; or
if we are unable to raise additional capital on terms that are satisfactory to us.
Weakness or worsening of the economy, real estate markets or unemployment levels may increase the likelihood that one or
more of these events will occur. If our liquidity is adversely affected, it may have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
An actual or perceived reduction in our financial strength may cause others to reduce or cease doing business with us,
which could result in a decrease in our net interest income and fee revenues.
Our customers rely upon our financial strength and stability and evaluate the risks of doing business with us. If we experience
diminished financial strength or stability, actual or perceived, including due to market or regulatory developments, announced
or rumored business developments or results of operations, or a decline in stock price, customers may withdraw their deposits
or otherwise seek services from other banking institutions and prospective customers may select other service providers. The
risk that we may be perceived as less creditworthy relative to other market participants is increased in the current market
environment, where the consolidation of financial institutions, including major global financial institutions, is resulting in a
smaller number of much larger counterparties and competitors. As our community banks become more closely identified with
the Wintrust name, the impact of any perceived weakness or creditworthiness at either the holding company or our community
banks may be greater than in prior periods. If customers reduce their deposits with us or select other service providers for all or
a portion of the services that we provide them, net interest income and fee revenues will decrease accordingly, and could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Loss of deposits or a change in the deposit mix could increase our funding costs.
Deposits are a low cost and stable source of funding. Wintrust competes with banks and other financial institutions for deposits
and as a result, Wintrust could lose deposits in the future, clients may shift their deposits into higher cost products or Wintrust
may need to raise interest rates to avoid deposit attrition. Funding costs may also increase if lost deposits are replaced with
38
wholesale funding. Higher funding costs reduce Wintrust’s net interest margin, net interest income and net income. Any of a
variety of single or combined factors could contribute to adverse movement in deposits or deposit costs, including but not
limited to economic uncertainty, rapid movements in market interest rates or the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, entrance of
competitors, disruptive technology or decreased confidence in Wintrust or the banking industry.
If our credit rating is lowered, our financing costs could increase.
As of December 31, 2023, we have been rated by Fitch Ratings as "BBB+" and DBRS as "A (low)". A credit rating is not a
recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating
organization.
Our creditworthiness is not fixed and should be expected to change over time as a result of company performance and industry
conditions. We cannot give any assurances that our credit ratings will remain at current levels, and it is possible that our ratings
could be lowered or withdrawn by Fitch Ratings or DBRS. Any actual or threatened downgrade or withdrawal of our credit
rating could affect our perception in the marketplace and our ability to raise capital, and could increase our debt financing costs.
If our growth requires us to raise additional capital, that capital may not be available when it is needed or the cost of that
capital may be very high.
We are required by regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations (see the above risk
factor “Legal and Regulatory Risks - If we fail to meet our regulatory capital ratios, we may be forced to raise capital or sell
assets”) and as we grow, internally and through acquisitions, the amount of capital required to support our operations grows as
well. We may need to raise additional capital to support continued growth both internally and through acquisitions. Any capital
we obtain may result in the dilution of the interests of existing holders of our common stock.
Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time which are outside
our control and on our financial condition and performance. The interest rate environment, disruptions in financial markets,
negative perception of our business or our financial strength or other factors may impact our ability to raise additional capital
when needed, or on terms acceptable to us. For example, in the event of future uncertainty in the banking industry or other
idiosyncratic events, there is no guarantee that the U.S. government would invoke the systemic risk exception, create additional
liquidity programs or take any other action to stabilize the banking industry or provide liquidity. Any diminished ability to
access short-term funding or capital markets to raise additional capital, if needed, could subject us to liability, and our ability to
further expand our operations through internal growth and acquisitions could be materially impaired and our financial condition
and liquidity could be materially and negatively affected.
Disruption in the financial markets could result in lower fair values for our investment securities portfolio.
The Company's available-for-sale debt and trading securities as well as certain equity securities are carried at fair value.
Accounting standards require the Company to categorize these securities according to a fair value hierarchy. As of
December 31, 2023, approximately 96% of the Company's available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities with a readily
determinable fair value were categorized in level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy (meaning that their fair values were
determined by unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, quoted prices for similar assets or other
observable inputs). Significant prolonged reduced investor demand could manifest itself in lower fair values for these securities
and may result in recognition of an other-than-temporary or permanent impairment of available-for-sale debt securities and
unrealized losses of equity securities with a readily determinable fair value recognized in earnings, which could lead to
accounting charges and have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
The remaining securities in our available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities with a readily determinable fair value
portfolios were categorized as level 3 (meaning that their fair values were determined by inputs that are unobservable in the
market and therefore require a greater degree of management judgment). The determination of fair value for securities
categorized in level 3 involves significant judgment due to the complexity of factors contributing to the valuation, many of
which are not readily observable in the market. In addition, the nature of the business of the third party source that is valuing
the securities at any given time could impact the valuation of the securities. Consequently, the ultimate sales price for any of
these securities could vary significantly from the recorded fair value at December 31, 2023, especially if the security is sold
during a period of illiquidity or market disruption or as part of a large block of securities under a forced transaction.
39
There can be no assurance that decline in market value of available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities with a readily
determinable fair value associated with these disruptions will not result in credit or permanent impairments, and unrealized
losses, respectively, of these assets, which would lead to accounting charges which could have a material negative effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are a bank holding company, and our sources of funds, including to pay dividends, are limited.
We are a bank holding company and our operations are primarily conducted by and through our 15 operating banks, which are
subject to significant federal and state regulation. Cash available to pay dividends to our shareholders, repurchase our shares or
repay our indebtedness is derived primarily from dividends received from our banks and our ability to receive dividends from
our subsidiaries is restricted. Various statutory provisions restrict the amount of dividends our banks can pay to us without
regulatory approval. The banks may not pay cash dividends if that payment could reduce the amount of their capital below that
necessary to meet the “adequately capitalized” level in accordance with regulatory capital requirements. It is also possible that,
depending upon the financial condition of the banks and other factors, regulatory authorities could conclude that payment of
dividends or other payments, including payments to us, is an unsafe or unsound practice and impose restrictions or prohibit
such payments. Our inability to receive dividends from our banks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Risks Related to General Operations
Our controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented.
Management regularly reviews and updates our internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures
and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well-designed and operated, is based in
part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met.
Any circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our operational or security systems, networks or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could fail or be breached, which
could disrupt our business and adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, as well as cause
legal or reputational harm.
The potential for operational risk exposure exists throughout our business and, as a result of our interactions with, and reliance
on, third parties, is not limited to our own internal operational functions. Our operational and security systems, networks and
infrastructure, including our computer systems and networks, data management, and internal processes, as well as those of third
parties, are integral to our performance. We rely on our employees and third parties in our day-to-day and ongoing operations,
who may, as a result of human error, misconduct, malfeasance or failure, or breach of our or of third-party systems or
infrastructure, expose us to risk. For example, our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by any significant
disruptions to us or to third parties with whom we interact or upon whom we rely. In addition, our ability to implement backup
systems and other safeguards with respect to third-party systems is more limited than with respect to our own systems.
Moreover, technological or financial difficulties of one of our third-party vendors or their subcontractors could adversely affect
our business to the extent those difficulties results in the interruption or discontinuation of services provided by an affected
vendor. Our financial, accounting, data processing, backup or other operating or security systems, networks and infrastructure,
or those of third parties, may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors,
including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, which could adversely affect our ability to process transactions
or provide services. Such events may include sudden increases in customer transaction volume; electrical, telecommunications
or other major physical infrastructure outages; natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and floods; disease
pandemics; and events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including wars and terrorist acts. In addition,
we may need to take our systems or networks offline if they become infected with malware or a computer virus or as a result of
another form of cyber-attack, information security breach or other similar incident. In the event that backup systems are
utilized, they may not process data as quickly as our primary systems and some data might not have been saved to backup
systems, potentially resulting in a temporary or permanent loss of such data. Our business recovery plan may not be adequate
and may not prevent significant interruptions of our operations or substantial losses. We frequently update our systems to
support our operations and growth and to remain compliant with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. This updating entails
significant costs and creates risks associated with implementing new systems and networks and integrating them with existing
ones, including business interruptions. Implementation and testing of controls related to our computer systems and networks,
security monitoring and retaining and training personnel required to operate our systems also entail significant costs.
40
We may not be insured against all types of losses as a result of disruptions to or failures of our operational and security systems,
networks and infrastructure or those of third parties, and our insurance coverage may not be available on reasonable terms, or at
all, or may be inadequate to cover all losses resulting from such disruptions or failures. Disruptions or failures in our business
structure or in the structure of one or more of our third-party vendors could interrupt the operations or increase the cost of doing
business. The occurrence of any disruptions or failures impacting our or our third-party vendors’ operational or security
systems, networks or infrastructure could result in a loss of customer business and expose us to additional regulatory scrutiny,
civil litigation, and possible financial liability, any of which could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and
financial condition, as well as cause reputational harm.
We face risks from cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents that could result in the
disclosure of confidential and other information (including personal information), all of which could adversely affect our
business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure.
Our computer systems and network infrastructure and those of third parties, on which we are highly dependent, are subject to
security risks and could be susceptible to cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents. Our business
relies on the secure processing, transmission, storage and retrieval of confidential, personal, proprietary and other information
in our computer and data management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management systems and networks
of third parties. In addition, to access our network, products and services, our customers and other third parties may use
personal mobile devices or computing devices that are outside of our network environment and are subject to their own
cybersecurity risks.
We, our customers, regulators and other third parties, including other financial services institutions and companies engaged in
data processing, have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber-attacks, information or security
breaches, and other similar incidents. These may include, among other things, computer viruses, malicious or destructive code,
phishing attacks, denial of service or information, ransomware, malfeasance or improper access by employees or vendors,
attacks on personal email of employees, hacking, terrorist activities, identity theft, social engineering, credential stuffing,
account takeovers, insider threats, human error, fraud, or other similar incidents that could result in the unauthorized release,
gathering, monitoring, misuse, misappropriation, loss, disclosure or destruction of confidential, personal, proprietary and other
information of ours, our employees, our customers or of third parties, damage to our systems and networks or other material
disruption of our or our customers’ or other third parties’ network access or business operations. As cyber threats continue to
evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures
or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents. Despite efforts to ensure the integrity of
our systems and implement controls, processes, policies and other protective measures, we may not be able to anticipate all
security breaches, nor may we be able to implement guaranteed preventive measures against such security breaches. Cyber
threats are rapidly evolving and we may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks and could be held liable for any
security breach or loss.
Cybersecurity risks for banking organizations have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of
new technologies, and the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions. For
example, cybersecurity risks may increase in the future as we continue to increase our mobile-payment and other internet-based
product offerings and expand our internal usage of web-based products and applications. In addition, cybersecurity risks have
significantly increased in recent years in part due to the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime affiliates,
terrorist organizations, hostile foreign governments, nation states, nation state-supported actors, disgruntled employees or
vendors, activists and other external parties, including those involved in corporate espionage. Even the most advanced internal
control environment may be vulnerable to compromise. Targeted social engineering attacks and "spear phishing" attacks are
becoming more sophisticated and are extremely difficult to prevent. In such an attack, an attacker will attempt to fraudulently
induce colleagues, customers or other users of our systems and networks to disclose sensitive information (including
confidential, personal, proprietary and other information) in order to gain access to its data or that of its clients. Persistent
attackers may succeed in penetrating defenses given enough resources, time, and motive. The techniques used by cyber
criminals change frequently and may not be recognized until launched or until well after a breach has occurred. The risk of a
security breach caused by a cyber-attack, information security breach or other similar incident at a vendor or by unauthorized
vendor access has also increased in recent years. Additionally, the existence of cyber-attacks, information security breaches or
other similar incidents at third-party vendors with access to our data may not be disclosed to us in a timely manner. While we
generally perform cybersecurity diligence on our key vendors, because we do not control our vendors and our ability to monitor
their cybersecurity is limited, we cannot ensure the cybersecurity measures they take will be sufficient to protect any
information we share them. Due to applicable laws and regulations or contractual obligations, we may be held responsible for
cyber-attacks, information security breaches or other similar incidents attributed to our service providers as they relate to the
information we share with them.
41
We also face indirect technology, cybersecurity and operational risks relating to the customers, clients and other third parties
with whom we do business or upon whom we rely to facilitate or enable our business activities, including, for example,
financial counterparties, regulators and providers of critical infrastructure such as internet access and electrical power. As a
result of increasing consolidation, interdependence and complexity of financial entities and technology systems, a technology
failure, cyber-attack, information security breach or other similar incident that significantly degrades, deletes or compromises
the systems, networks or data of one or more financial entities could have a material impact on counterparties or other market
participants, including us. This consolidation, interconnectivity and complexity increases the risk of operational failure, on both
individual and industry-wide bases, as disparate systems need to be integrated, often on an accelerated basis. Any third-party
technology failure, cyber-attack, information security breach, termination, constraint or other similar incident could, among
other things, adversely affect our ability to effect transactions, service our clients, manage our exposure to risk or expand our
business.
Moreover, debit card numbers are susceptible to theft at the point of sale via the physical terminal through which transactions
are processed and by other means of hacking. The security and integrity of these transactions are dependent upon retailers’
vigilance and willingness to invest in technology and upgrades. Despite third-party security risks that are beyond our control,
we offer our customers protection against fraud and attendant losses for unauthorized use of debit cards in order to stay
competitive in the marketplace. Offering such protection to our customers exposes us to potential losses which, in the event of a
data breach at one or more retailers of considerable magnitude, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Although we believe that we have appropriate information security procedures and controls designed to prevent or limit the
effects of a cyber-attack, information security breach or other similar incident, our or our customers’ and/or third parties’
computers, systems or networks may be the target of cyber-attacks, information security breaches or other similar incidents that
could result in the unauthorized release, accessing, gathering, monitoring, loss, destruction, modification, acquisition, transfer,
use or other processing of our or our customers’ confidential, personal, proprietary and other information. Additionally, we may
not be insured against all types of losses as a result of cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents,
and our insurer may deny coverage as to any future claim or insurance coverage may not be available on reasonable terms, or at
all, or may be inadequate to cover all losses resulting from such incidents.
Cyber-attacks, information security breaches or similar incidents, whether directed at us or third parties, may result in a material
loss or have material consequences. Furthermore, the public perception that a cyber-attack on our systems has been successful,
whether or not this perception is correct, may damage our reputation with customers and third parties with whom we do
business. Hacking or other unauthorized disclosure of personal information and identity theft risks, in particular, could cause
serious reputational harm. A successful penetration or circumvention of system security could cause us serious negative
consequences, including our loss of customers and business opportunities, significant disruption to our operations and business,
misappropriation or destruction of our confidential, personal, proprietary or other information and/or that of our customers or
other third parties, or damage to our or our customers’ and/or third parties’ computers, systems or networks, and could result in
a violation of applicable data privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations and other laws and regulations, litigation exposure,
regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, remediation costs, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage,
reimbursement or other compensatory costs, remediation costs, additional compliance costs, and could adversely impact our
results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Our vendors may be responsible for failures that adversely affect our operations.
We use and rely upon many external vendors to provide us with day-to-day products and services essential to our operations.
We are thus exposed to risk that such vendors will not perform as contracted or at agreed-upon service levels. The failure of our
vendors to perform as contracted or at necessary service levels for any reason could disrupt our operations, which could
adversely affect our business. In addition, if any of our vendors experience insolvency or other business failure, such failure
could affect our ability to obtain necessary products or services from a substitute vendor in a timely and cost-effective manner
or prevent us from effectively pursuing certain business objectives entirely. Our failure to implement business objectives due to
vendor nonperformance could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information we receive about our customers and counterparties to make
credit decisions.
We rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties in deciding whether to extend credit or enter
into other transactions. This information could include financial statements, credit reports, and other financial information. We
also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties, or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the
42
accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, credit reports, or
other financial information could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel, our ability to provide high quality service will be
diminished, we may lose key customer relationships, and our results of operations may suffer.
We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain experienced personnel, including our
senior management and other key personnel. Our business model is dependent upon our ability to provide high quality and
personal service. In addition, as a holding company that conducts its operations through our subsidiaries, we are focused on
providing entrepreneurial-based compensation to the chief executives of each our business units. As a Company with start-up
and growth oriented operations, we are cognizant that to attract and retain the managerial talent necessary to operate and grow
our businesses we often have to compensate our executives with a view to the business we expect them to manage, rather than
the size of the business they currently manage. Accordingly, any executive compensation restrictions may negatively impact
our ability to retain and attract senior management. The departure of a senior manager or other key personnel may damage
relationships with certain customers, or certain customers may choose to follow such personnel to a competitor. The loss of any
of our senior managers or other key personnel, or our inability to identify, recruit and retain such personnel, particularly during
a period in which the labor market is characterized as tight and employee turnover has escalated in many industries, could
materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. If we fail to effectively manage the
transition in the position of chief executive officer, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and
reputation, as well as our ability to successfully attract, motivate and retain key employees, could be harmed.
Losses incurred in connection with actual or projected repurchases and indemnification payments related to mortgages that
we have sold into the secondary market may exceed our financial statement reserves and we may be required to increase
such reserves in the future. Increases to our reserves and losses incurred in connection with actual loan repurchases and
indemnification payments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
We engage in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market. In connection with such
sales, we make certain representations and warranties, which, if breached, may require us to repurchase such loans, substitute
other loans or indemnify the purchasers of such loans for actual losses incurred in respect of such loans. We receive requests for
loan repurchases and indemnification payments relating to the representations and warranties with respect to such loans. We
have been able to reach settlements with a number of purchasers, and believe that we have established appropriate reserves with
respect to indemnification requests. It is possible that the number of such requests will increase or that we will not be able to
reach settlements with respect to such requests in the future. Accordingly, it is possible that losses incurred in connection with
loan repurchases and indemnification payments may be in excess of our financial statement reserves, and we may be required to
increase such reserves and may sustain additional losses associated with such loan repurchases and indemnification payments in
the future. Increases to our reserves and losses incurred by us in connection with actual loan repurchases and indemnification
payments in excess of our reserves could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
Our business could be adversely affected by the occurrence of extraordinary events, such as acts of war, terrorist attacks,
natural disasters and public health threats.
An act of war, terrorist activity, including acts of domestic terrorism or violence, a major epidemic or pandemic, natural
disaster, or the threat of such an event or other public health threat, could adversely affect our customers and our business. Such
events could significantly impact the demand for our products and services as well as the ability of our customers to repay
loans, affect the stability of our deposit base, impair the value of the collateral securing loans, adversely impact our employee
base, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue, and cause us to incur additional expenses. Additionally,
financial markets may be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including the war in
Ukraine, the conflict between Israel and Hamas, terrorism or other geopolitical events. The occurrence or threat of any such
extraordinary event could result in a material negative effect on our business and results of operations.
43
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders.
Certain provisions of our articles of incorporation, by-laws and Illinois law may have the effect of impeding the acquisition of
control of Wintrust by means of a tender offer, a proxy fight, open-market purchases or otherwise in a transaction not approved
by our board of directors. For example, our board of directors may issue additional authorized shares of our capital stock to
deter future attempts to gain control of Wintrust, including the authority to determine the terms of any one or more series of
preferred stock, such as voting rights, conversion rates and liquidation preferences. As a result of the ability to fix voting rights
for a series of preferred stock, the board has the power, to the extent consistent with its fiduciary duty, to issue a series of
preferred stock to persons friendly to management in order to attempt to block a merger or other transaction by which a third
party seeks control, and thereby assist the incumbent board of directors and management to retain their respective positions. In
addition, our articles of incorporation expressly elect to be governed by the provisions of Section 7.85 of the Illinois Business
Corporation Act, which would make it more difficult for another party to acquire us without the approval of our board of
directors.
The ability of a third party to acquire us is also limited under applicable banking regulations. The BHC Act requires any “bank
holding company” (as defined in the BHC Act) to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve prior to acquiring more than 5%
of our outstanding common stock. Any person other than a bank holding company is required to obtain prior approval of the
Federal Reserve to acquire 10% or more of our outstanding common stock under the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978. Any
holder of 25% or more of our outstanding common stock, other than an individual, is subject to regulation as a “bank holding
company” under the BHC Act. For purposes of calculating ownership thresholds under these banking regulations, bank
regulators would generally take the position that the maximum number of shares of Wintrust common stock that a holder is
entitled to receive pursuant to securities convertible into or settled in Wintrust common stock, including pursuant to any
warrants to purchase Wintrust common stock held by such holder, must be taken into account in calculating a shareholder's
aggregate holdings of Wintrust common stock.
These provisions may have the effect of discouraging a future takeover attempt that is not approved by our board of directors
but which our individual shareholders may deem to be in their best interests or in which our shareholders may receive a
substantial premium for their shares over then-current market prices. As a result, shareholders who might desire to participate in
such a transaction may not have an opportunity to do so. Such provisions will also render the removal of our current board of
directors or management more difficult.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY
Risk Management and Strategy
Like every major financial services institution, Wintrust faces significant and persistent cybersecurity risks. Whether in the
form of data theft, ransomware, phishing, denial of service, or third-party vendor incidents, threat actors continue to become
more sophisticated and escalate their efforts against financial institutions. At Wintrust, the Board of Directors and executive
management are committed to devoting the necessary resources into monitoring, detecting, preventing and mitigating cyber
risk. As a regulated financial institution, we are required to comply with various regulations applicable to cybersecurity, as well
as guidance issued by our regulators, and our cybersecurity program closely tracks to those requirements. Additionally,
Wintrust leverages global cybersecurity standards as general guides, including the National Institute of Standards and
Technology Cybersecurity Framework and the International Organization Standardization 27001 Information Security
Management System Requirements.
44
Cybersecurity oversight begins with the Information Technology & Information Security Committee (“IT/IS Committee”) of
the Wintrust Board of Directors. The Wintrust Chief Security Officer (“CSO”) ”) and Deputy Chief Information Security
Officer (“Deputy CISO”) oversee the cybersecurity program. The CSO has a dual reporting structure, reporting to both the IT/
IS Committee and the Vice Chairman/Chief Operating Officer of Wintrust. The CSO and Deputy CISO, each with extensive
industry experience, manage a team of skilled professionals with cybersecurity expertise. This team governs our cybersecurity
program that follows seven pillars: strategy; prevention, detection, response, measurement, compliance, and training. Our
cybersecurity program employs a wide range of technological, administrative, and physical security measures designed to
address the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information and data of both Wintrust and our customers. We have
established policies, processes and procedures to monitor, report and respond to suspected or actual security events. A critical
function of the cybersecurity program is the Security Operations Center, which is constantly monitoring Wintrust systems to
detect threats. If any credible threats are detected, the Security Operations Center notifies both the CSO and Deputy CISO, and
the appropriate response plan is initiated. The CSO will advise executive management and other relevant stakeholders as
necessary. We coordinate with our third parties and vendor partners through assessments and due diligence before sharing or
allowing the hosting of data. We also work with our outside partners to investigate security events that may have impacted our
confidential and other information, and to leverage lessons learned during those investigations. In addition, we contractually
require our third-party service providers that possess or process any Wintrust or customer information to adhere to certain
security requirements, controls and responsibilities based on the risk profile of the relationship.
Wintrust also recognizes that individual employees are frequent targets of threat actors. We regularly engage with employees on
the importance of protecting the information and data of Wintrust, our customers and employees through monthly newsletters,
posters and ad-hoc communications. If specific threats are identified, management may communicate those threats directly to
employees for heightened awareness. Our cybersecurity program requires employees to review information security and
privacy policies annually, complete multiple cybersecurity training courses throughout the year, and participate in monthly
mock phishing campaigns. We also communicate with our customers about their role in enhancing cybersecurity.
Governance
In addition to our dedicated cybersecurity team, Wintrust’s approach to cybersecurity is supported by dedicated risk
management and internal audit teams. Our governance program maintains policies and standards, which are validated through
risk-based assessments, reviews and testing. The CSO reports at regular intervals to the Wintrust Enterprise Risk Management
Committee, the IT/IS Committee, and the Audit Committee of the Wintrust Board of Directors, as well as the full Wintrust
Board of Directors, as necessary. The Audit Committee performs an annual review of our cybersecurity program, which
includes a discussion of management’s actions to identify and detect threats and incident plans in the event of a response or
recovery situation. The Audit Committee receives an annual review that includes review of recent enhancements to the
cybersecurity program and management’s progress on its cybersecurity strategic roadmap. In addition, the full Board of
Directors receives quarterly cybersecurity reports, which include a review of key performance indicators, test results and related
remediation, and an overview of recent threats and how the Company is managing those threats. For more information on the
material risks that cybersecurity threats pose to us, please see our risk factor disclosures under Item 1A of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Notwithstanding the extensive approach we take to cybersecurity, Wintrust continues to face risks and accompanying threats
that could have a material adverse effect on the enterprise. We work to manage these risks and threats on a daily basis. To date,
we have not realized any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, that
have, or are reasonably likely to, materially affect us, our business strategy, results of operation or financial condition. We
continue to invest in our cybersecurity program, the resiliency of our networks and work to enhance our internal controls.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company’s executive offices are located at 9700 W. Higgins Road, Rosemont, Illinois as well as additional nearby
corporate office locations at 9701 W. Higgins Road, Rosemont, Illinois and 9801 W. Higgins Road, Rosemont, Illinois. The
Company also leases office locations and retail space at 231 S. LaSalle Street in downtown Chicago and at 731 N. Jackson
Street in downtown Milwaukee. The Company’s community banking segment operates through 174 banking facilities, the
majority of which are owned. The Company owns 224 automatic teller machines, the majority of which are housed at banking
locations. The banking facilities are located in communities throughout the Chicago metropolitan area, southern Wisconsin and
northwest Indiana as well as two banking locations in southwest Florida. Excess space in certain properties is leased to third
parties. Wintrust Mortgage, also of our banking segment, is headquartered in our corporate headquarters in Rosemont, Illinois
and has 31 locations in 9 states, all of which are leased, as well as office locations at several of our banks.
45
The Company’s wealth management subsidiaries has locations in downtown Chicago, Appleton, Wisconsin, Tampa, Florida,
and Stamford, Connecticut, all of which are leased, as well as office locations at several of our banks. FIRST Insurance Funding
and Wintrust Life Finance have one location in Northbrook, Illinois which is owned and locations in downtown Newark, New
Jersey, Long Island, New York and Newport Beach, California, all of which are leased. FIFC Canada has three locations in
Canada that are leased, located in Toronto, Ontario; Wainwright, Alberta; and Vancouver, British Columbia. Wintrust Asset
Finance is located in our corporate headquarters in Rosemont, Illinois and has locations in Frisco, Texas, and Irvine, California,
all of which are leased. Tricom has one location in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin which is owned.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information required by this item is set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, under Note
(20) “Commitments and Contingencies”.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
46
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company’s common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Stock Market under the symbol WTFC.
Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the five-year percentage change in the Company’s cumulative shareholder return
on common stock compared with the cumulative total return on composites of (1) all NASDAQ Global Select Market stocks for
United States companies (broad market index) and (2) all NASDAQ Global Select Market bank stocks (peer group index).
Cumulative total return is computed by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period
and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the share
price at the beginning of the measurement period. The NASDAQ Global Select Market for United States companies’ index
comprises all domestic common shares traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the NASDAQ Small-Cap Market.
The NASDAQ Global Select Market bank stocks index comprises all banks traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and
the NASDAQ Small-Cap Market.
This graph and other information furnished in the section titled “Performance Graph” under this Part II, Item 5 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be “soliciting” materials or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation
14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, as amended.
Wintrust Financial Corporation
NASDAQ — Total US
NASDAQ — Bank Index
2018
100.00
100.00
100.00
2019
108.17
131.17
137.18
2020
95.44
159.07
119.62
2021
144.21
200.26
164.26
2022
136.22
160.75
135.89
2023
152.59
203.23
149.56
47
Period EndingIndex ValueTotal Return PerformanceWintrust Financial CorporationNASDAQ - Total USNASDAQ - Bank Index12/31/1812/31/1912/31/2012/31/2112/31/2212/31/236080100120140160180200220
Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders
As of February 8, 2024, there were approximately 1,770 shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock.
Dividends on Common Stock
The Company’s Board of Directors approved the first semi-annual dividend on the Company’s common stock in January 2000
and continued to approve a semi-annual dividend until quarterly dividends were approved starting in 2014. The payment of
dividends is subject to statutory restrictions and restrictions arising under the terms of the Company's Fixed-to-Floating Non-
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), the terms of the Company’s Fixed-Rate Reset
Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series E (the “Series E Preferred Stock”), the terms of the Company’s Trust
Preferred Securities offerings and under certain financial covenants in the Company’s revolving and term credit facilities.
Under the terms of these separate revolving and term credit facilities, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends on any
equity interests, including its common stock and preferred stock, if such payments would cause the Company to be in default
under its credit facilities or exceed a certain threshold.
The following is a summary of the cash dividends paid in 2023 and 2022:
Record Date
November 9, 2023
August 10, 2023
May 11, 2023
February 9, 2023
November 10, 2022
August 11, 2022
May 12, 2022
February 10, 2022
Payable Date
November 24, 2023
August 24, 2023
May 25, 2023
February 23, 2023
November 25, 2022
August 25, 2022
May 26, 2022
February 24, 2022
Dividend per Share
$0.40
$0.40
$0.40
$0.40
$0.34
$0.34
$0.34
$0.34
On January 25, 2024, Wintrust Financial Corporation announced that the Company’s Board of Directors approved a quarterly
cash dividend of $0.45 per share of outstanding common stock. The dividend was paid on February 22, 2024 to shareholders of
record as of February 8, 2024.
The final determination of timing, amount and payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors
and will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors. Because the
Company’s consolidated net income consists largely of net income of the banks and certain wealth management subsidiaries,
the Company’s ability to pay dividends generally depends upon its receipt of dividends from these entities. The Company’s and
the banks’ ability to pay dividends is subject to banking laws, regulations and policies. See “Supervision and Regulation -
Payment of Dividends and Share Repurchases” in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. During 2023, 2022 and 2021,
the banks and certain wealth management subsidiaries paid $360.0 million, $52.0 million and $145.0 million, respectively, in
dividends to the Company.
Reference is also made to Note (19) “Regulatory Matters” to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and “Liquidity and Capital
Resources” contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the restrictions on the ability of certain
subsidiaries to transfer funds to the Company in the form of dividends.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our previously authorized share repurchase program permitted the repurchase of up to $125 million of our common stock. On
October 28, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of the Company’s
outstanding shares of common stock. This authorization is incremental to the remaining authorization of approximately $23
million under the previous program, which the Board approved in 2019. The repurchase authorization does not have an
expiration date. No purchases of the Company’s common shares were made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated
purchaser” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, during the twelve months
ended December 31, 2023.
ITEM 6. [Reserved]
48
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion highlights the significant factors affecting the operations and financial condition of Wintrust for the
three years ended December 31, 2023. The detailed financial discussion focuses on 2023 results compared to 2022. This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For a discussion of 2022 results compared to 2021, refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” of the Wintrust Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed
on February 28, 2023.
OPERATING SUMMARY
Wintrust’s key measures of profitability and balance sheet changes are shown in the following table:
Years Ended
December 31,
Percentage
(%) or
Basis Point (bp)
Change
Percentage
(%) or
Basis Point (bp)
Change
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2023
2022
2021
2022 to 2023
2021 to 2022
Net income
$
622,626
$
509,682
$
466,151
22 %
9 %
Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-
GAAP) (1)
Net income per common share — Diluted
Net revenue (2)
Net interest income
Net interest margin
Net interest margin - fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (1)
Net overhead ratio (3)
Non-interest income to average assets
Non-interest expense to average assets
Return on average assets
Return on average common equity
Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (1)
At end of period
959,471
9.58
2,271,970
1,837,864
779,144
8.02
1,956,415
1,495,362
578,533
7.58
1,711,077
1,124,957
23
19
16
23
35
6
14
33
3.66 %
3.15 %
2.57 %
51 bp
58 bp
3.68
1.64
0.81
2.45
1.16
12.90
15.23
3.17
1.42
0.91
2.33
1.01
11.41
13.73
2.58
1.17
1.25
2.42
1.00
11.27
13.83
51
22
(10)
12
15
149
150
59
25
(34)
(9)
1
14
(10)
Total assets
$ 56,259,934
$ 52,949,649
$ 50,142,143
6 %
6 %
Total loans, excluding loans held-for-sale
42,131,831
39,196,485
34,789,104
Total deposits
Total shareholders’ equity
45,397,170
42,902,544
42,095,585
5,399,526
4,796,838
4,498,688
7
6
13
13
2
7
Average loans to average deposits ratio
Book value per common share (1)
Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (1)
Common equity to assets ratio (1)
Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (1)
Market price per common share
Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related
commitment losses to total loans
Non-performing loans to total loans
$
93.1 %
81.43
70.33
$
8.9 %
7.7
87.5 %
72.12
61.00
$
8.3 %
7.1
71.62
59.64
8.1 %
6.9
$
92.75
$
84.52
$
90.82
1.01 %
0.33
0.91 %
0.26
0.86 %
0.21
13 %
15
60 bp
60
10 %
10 bp
7
1 %
2
20 bp
20
(7) %
5 bp
5
84.7 %
560 bp
280 bp
(1) See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios” for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
(2) Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
(3) The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income and dividing by
that period’s total average assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
Please refer to the Consolidated Results of Operations section later in this discussion for an analysis of the Company’s
operations for the past three years.
49
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES/RATIOS
The accounting and reporting policies of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United
States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used
by management to evaluate and measure the Company’s performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income
(including its individual components), taxable-equivalent net interest margin (including its individual components), the taxable-
equivalent efficiency ratio, tangible common equity ratio, tangible book value per common share, return on average tangible
common equity and pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses. Management believes that these measures and ratios
provide users of the Company’s financial information a more meaningful view of the performance of the Company’s interest-
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Company’s operating efficiency. Other financial holding companies
may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.
Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company and its banking subsidiaries
on a fully taxable-equivalent (“FTE”) basis. In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-
exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis using tax rates effective as of the end of the period. This measure
ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE
basis is also used in the calculation of the Company’s efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-
interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses), measures how much it costs to produce
one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily
operations to operational expenses. Management considers the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share as useful measurements of the Company’s equity. The Company references the return on average tangible
common equity as a measurement of profitability. Management considers pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses
as a useful measurement of the Company’s core net income.
50
The following table presents a reconciliation of certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios used by the Company to
evaluate and measure the Company’s performance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures for the last three
years.
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Interest Margin and Efficiency Ratio:
(A) Interest Income (GAAP)
Taxable-equivalent adjustment:
-Loans
-Liquidity management assets
-Other earning assets
(B) Interest Income (non-GAAP)
(C) Interest Expense (GAAP)
(D) Net Interest Income (GAAP) (A minus C)
(E) Net interest Income, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (B minus C)
Net interest margin (GAAP)
Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP)
(F) Non-interest income
(G) Losses on investment securities, net
(H) Non-interest expense
Efficiency ratio (H/(D+F-G))
Efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) (H/(E+F-G))
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Common Equity Ratio:
Total shareholders’ equity (GAAP)
Less: Non-convertible preferred stock (GAAP)
Less: Acquisition-related intangible assets (GAAP)
(I) Total tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP)
(J) Total assets (GAAP)
Less: Acquisition-related intangible assets (GAAP)
(K) Total tangible assets (non-GAAP)
Common equity to assets ratio (GAAP) (L/J)
Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (I/K)
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Book Value per Common Share:
Total shareholders’ equity (GAAP)
Less: Non-convertible preferred stock (GAAP)
(L) Total common equity
(M) Actual common shares outstanding
Book value per common share (L/M)
Tangible book value per common share (Non-GAAP) (I/M)
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Return on Average Tangible Common Equity:
(N) Net income applicable to common shares
Add: Acquisition-related intangible asset amortization
Less: Tax effect of acquisition-related intangible asset amortization
After-tax acquisition-related intangible asset amortization
(O) Tangible net income applicable to common shares (non-GAAP)
Total average shareholders’ equity
Less: Average preferred stock
(P) Total average common shareholders’ equity
Less: Average acquisition-related intangible assets
(Q) Total average tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP)
Return on average common equity (N/P)
Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (O/Q)
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income:
Income before taxes
Add: Provision for credit losses
Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
2,893,114
$
1,747,443
$
1,275,484
7,827
2,249
10
3,619
1,977
5
2,903,200
$
1,753,044
$
1,055,250
1,837,864
1,847,950
3.66 %
3.68
252,081
1,495,362
1,500,963
3.15 %
3.17
434,106
$
461,053
$
1,525
1,312,499
57.81 %
57.55
(20,427)
1,177,271
59.55 %
59.38
5,399,526
$
4,796,838
$
(412,500)
(679,561)
4,307,465
56,259,934
(679,561)
$
$
55,580,373
$
8.9 %
7.7
5,399,526
(412,500)
4,987,026
61,244
81.43
70.33
$
$
$
(412,500)
(675,710)
3,708,628
52,949,649
(675,710)
52,273,939
8.3 %
7.1
4,796,838
(412,500)
4,384,338
60,794
72.12
61.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
594,662
$
481,718
$
5,498
(1,446)
4,052
598,714
5,023,153
(412,500)
4,610,653
(679,802)
3,930,851
12.90 %
15.23
845,081
114,390
959,471
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,116
(1,664)
4,452
486,170
4,634,224
(412,500)
4,221,724
(679,735)
3,541,989
11.41 %
13.73
700,555
78,589
779,144
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,627
1,972
2
1,279,085
150,527
1,124,957
1,128,558
2.57 %
2.58
586,120
(1,059)
1,132,544
66.15 %
66.01
4,498,688
(412,500)
(683,456)
3,402,732
50,142,143
(683,456)
49,458,687
8.1 %
6.9
4,498,688
(412,500)
4,086,188
57,054
71.62
59.64
438,187
7,734
(2,080)
5,654
443,841
4,300,742
(412,500)
3,888,242
(678,739)
3,209,503
11.27 %
13.83
637,796
(59,263)
578,533
51
OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY
2023 Highlights
The Company recorded net income of $622.6 million for the year of 2023 compared to $509.7 million and $466.2 million for
the years of 2022 and 2021, respectively. The results for 2023 demonstrate increased net interest income primarily due to
increasing net interest margin and significant growth in earning assets, partially offset by an FDIC special assessment, an
increase in provision for credit losses due to higher charge-offs for the year, growth in the portfolio and deterioration of
forecasted macroeconomic conditions used in the measurement of the allowance for credit losses as well as reduced mortgage
banking revenue primarily as a result of unfavorable fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), net of
servicing hedge, and a decrease in loans originated for sale, partially offset by favorable adjustments to the Company’s held-
for-sale portfolio of early buy-out exercised loans (“EBOs”) guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, which are held at fair
value.
The Company increased its loan portfolio from $39.2 billion at December 31, 2022 to $42.1 billion at December 31, 2023. This
increase was primarily due to growth in several portfolios, including the commercial, industrial and other, commercial real
estate, property and casualty premium finance receivables, and residential real estate portfolios. For more information regarding
changes in the Company’s loan portfolio, see “Analysis of Financial Condition – Interest Earning Assets” and Note (4) “Loans”
to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company recorded net interest income of $1.8 billion in 2023 compared to $1.5 billion and $1.1 billion in 2022 and 2021,
respectively. The higher level of net interest income recorded in 2023 compared to 2022 resulted primarily from a $2.8 billion
increase in average earning assets, and a 51 basis point increase in the net interest margin in 2023 (see “Net Interest Margin”
section later in this Item 7 for further detail).
Non-interest income totaled $434.1 million in 2023, decreasing $26.9 million, or 6%, compared to 2022. The decrease in non-
interest income in 2023 compared to 2022 was primarily attributable to decreases in mortgage banking revenues primarily as a
result of unfavorable fair value adjustments of MSRs, net of servicing hedge, and a decrease in loans originated for sale,
partially offset by favorable adjustments to the Company’s held-for-sale portfolio of EBOs guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies, which are held at fair value (see “Non-Interest Income” section later in this Item 7 for further detail).
Non-interest expense totaled $1.3 billion in 2023, increasing $135.2 million, or 11%, compared to 2022. The increase compared
to 2022 was primarily attributable to an $51.9 million increase in salary and employee benefits expense and a $42.5 million
increase in FDIC insurance expense. (see “Non-Interest Expense” section later in this Item 7 for further detail).
Management considers the maintenance of adequate liquidity to be important to the management of risk. Accordingly, during
2023, the Company continued its practice of maintaining appropriate funding capacity to provide the Company with adequate
liquidity for its ongoing operations. In this regard, the Company benefited from its strong deposit base, a liquid investment
portfolio and its access to funding from a variety of external funding sources. The Company had overnight liquid funds and
interest-bearing deposits with banks of $2.5 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Economic Environment
The economic environment in 2023 was characterized by growth in net interest margin due to the continued rising interest rate
environment, the related challenges in mortgage banking as a result of such rising interest rate environment, deteriorating
economic forecasts and, for banks, the associated impact on the allowance for credit losses as well as heightened competition
for deposit funding as rates available for deposit products rose significantly. The Company has employed certain strategies to
manage net income in the current rate environment, including those discussed below.
While the Company’s business and day-to-day operations are no longer being materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic,
despite the widespread distribution of vaccines and related boosters, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the
continued emergence of various new strains of the virus, may impact the Company’s future results. Please refer to Part I, Item
1A, “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Net Interest Income
The Company has leveraged its operating strengths to grow its earning assets base while still benefiting from high interest rates
and the resulting impact in net interest margin in 2023. In 2023, the Company's net interest margin increased to 3.66% (3.68%
on a fully tax-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) as compared to 3.15% (3.17% on a fully tax-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) in 2022,
52
primarily due to higher yields on the Company’s earning assets and a shift in earning asset mix in 2023 with loans
constituting a greater portion of earning assets than liquidity management assets. Significant growth in earning assets resulted in
the Company’s net interest income increasing by $342.5 million in 2023 compared to 2022. Based on contractual terms,
approximately 72% of our current loan balances are projected to reprice or mature in 2024. The magnitude of potential changes
in net interest income in various interest rate scenarios has continued to diminish. Given the unprecedented rise in interest rates,
the Company has made a conscious effort to reposition its exposure to changing interest rates given the uncertainty of the future
interest rate environment. To this end, management has executed various derivative instruments including collars and receive
fixed swaps to hedge variable rate loan exposures and originated a higher percentage of its loan originations in longer term
fixed rate loans. The Company will continue to monitor current and projected interest rates and may execute additional
derivatives to mitigate potential fluctuations in the net interest margin in future years.
The Company has continued its practice of writing call options against certain investment securities to economically hedge the
securities positions and receive fee income to compensate for net interest margin compression. In 2023, the Company
recognized $21.9 million in fees on covered call options compared to $14.1 million in 2022.
The Company utilizes “back to back” interest rate derivative transactions, primarily interest rate swaps, to receive floating rate
interest payments related to customer loans. In these arrangements, the Company makes a floating rate loan to a borrower who
prefers to pay a fixed rate. To accommodate the risk management strategy of certain qualified borrowers, the Company enters a
swap with its borrower to effectively convert the borrower's variable rate loan to a fixed rate. However, in order to minimize
the Company's exposure on these transactions and continue to receive a floating rate, the Company simultaneously executes an
offsetting mirror-image swap with various third parties.
Non-Interest Income
The interest rate environment impacts the profitability and mix of the Company’s mortgage banking business which generated
revenues of $83.1 million in 2023 and $155.2 million in 2022, representing 4% and 8% of total net revenue in 2023 and 2022,
respectively. Mortgage banking revenue is primarily comprised of gains on sales of mortgage loans originated for new home
purchases as well as mortgage refinancing. Mortgage revenue is also impacted by changes in the fair value of MSRs and EBOs
guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Mortgage originations for sale totaled $2.0 billion and $2.8 billion in 2023 and 2022,
respectively. In 2023, approximately 83% of originations were mortgages associated with new home purchases, while 17% of
originations were related to refinancing of mortgages. In 2022, approximately 71% of originations were mortgages associated
with new home purchases, while 29% of originations were related to refinancing of mortgages.
Non-Interest Expense
Management believes expense management is important to enhance profitability amid increased competition. Cost control and
an efficient infrastructure should position the Company appropriately as it continues its growth strategy. Management continues
to be disciplined in its approach to growth and plans to leverage the Company's existing expense infrastructure to expand its
presence in existing and complimentary markets. Potentially impacting the cost control strategies discussed above, the
Company anticipates increased costs resulting from the regulatory environment in which we operate as well as wage inflation,
higher FDIC insurance assessments and continued investment in technology.
Credit Quality
The Company continues to actively address non-performing assets and remains disciplined in its approach to grow without
sacrificing asset quality.
In particular:
•
The Company’s 2023 provision for credit losses totaled $114.4 million compared to a provision of $78.6 million in 2022
and a negative provision of $59.3 million in 2021. The provision in 2023 was primarily the result of higher charge-offs,
deterioration in the forecasted macroeconomic forecast, specifically the Company’s macroeconomic forecasts of key
model inputs (most notably, Commercial Real Estate Price Index and Baa corporate credit spreads) as well as growth in
the Company's loan portfolios. Net charge-offs increased to $45.5 million in 2023 (of which $27.8 million related to
commercial and commercial real estate loans), compared to $20.3 million in 2022 (of which $10.1 million related to
commercial and commercial real estate loans) and $21.5 million in 2021 (of which $20.2 million related to commercial
and commercial real estate loans).
53
•
•
•
•
The Company's allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses increased to $427.3 million at
December 31, 2023, reflecting an increase of $69.8 million, or 20%, when compared to 2022. At December 31, 2023,
approximately $223.9 million, or 52%, of the allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses was
associated with commercial real estate loans and an additional $169.6 million, or 40%, was associated with commercial
loans.
The Company has significant exposure to commercial real estate. At December 31, 2023, $11.3 billion, or 27%, of our
loan portfolio was commercial real estate, with approximately 68.8% located in our market area. The commercial real
estate loan portfolio was comprised of $2.1 billion in construction and development loans, and $9.3 billion in non-
construction loans. In analyzing the commercial real estate market, the Company does not rely upon the assessment of
broad market statistical data, in large part because the Company’s market area is diverse and covers many communities,
each of which is impacted differently by economic forces affecting the Company’s general market area. As such, the
extent of the decline in real estate valuations can vary meaningfully among the different types of commercial and other
real estate loans made by the Company. The Company uses its multi-chartered structure and local management
knowledge to analyze and manage the local market conditions at each of its banks.
Excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, total non-performing loans (loans on non-accrual
status and loans more than 90 days past due and still accruing interest) were $139.0 million (of which $35.5 million, or
26%, was related to commercial real estate) at December 31, 2023, an increase of $38.3 million compared to
December 31, 2022. Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans were 0.33% at December 31, 2023 compared to
0.26% at December 31, 2022.
The Company’s other real estate owned increased by $3.4 million to $13.3 million during 2023, from $9.9 million at
December 31, 2022. The $13.3 million of other real estate owned as of December 31, 2023 was comprised of $12.6
million of commercial real estate property and $720,000 of residential real estate property.
During 2023, management continued its efforts to aggressively resolve problem loans through liquidation, rather than retention
of loans or real estate acquired as collateral through the foreclosure process. Management believes these actions will serve the
Company well in the future by providing some protection for the Company from further valuation deterioration and permitting
management to spend less time on resolution of problem loans and more time on growing the Company’s core business and the
evaluation of other opportunities.
The Company enters into residential mortgage loan sale agreements with investors in the normal course of business. The
Company’s practice is generally not to retain long-term fixed-rate mortgages on its balance sheet in order to mitigate interest
rate risk, and consequently sells most of such mortgages into the secondary market. These agreements provide recourse to
investors through certain representations concerning credit information, loan documentation, collateral and insurability.
Investors request the Company to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans which the investors
believe do not comply with applicable representations. An increase in requests for loss indemnification can negatively impact
mortgage banking revenue as additional recourse expense. The liability for estimated losses on repurchase and indemnification
claims for residential mortgage loans previously sold to investors was $152,000 at December 31, 2023 and $624,000 at
December 31, 2022.
Community Banking
Through our community banking franchise, we provide banking and financial services primarily to individuals, small to mid-
sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional clients residing primarily in the local areas we service. Profitability
of this franchise is primarily driven by our net interest income and margin, our funding mix and related costs, the measurement
of the allowance for credit losses and the impact of current and forecasted macroeconomic conditions on such measurement, the
level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned, the amount of mortgage banking revenue and our history of
acquiring banking operations and establishing de novo banking locations.
Net interest income and margin. The primary source of our revenue is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference
between interest income and fees on earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense on liabilities to fund those
assets, including deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income can change significantly from period to period based on
general levels of interest rates, customer prepayment patterns, the mix of interest-earning assets and the mix of interest-bearing
and non-interest-bearing deposits and borrowings.
Funding mix and related costs. The most significant source of funding in community banking is core deposits, which are
comprised of non-interest-bearing deposits, non-brokered interest-bearing transaction accounts, savings deposits and domestic
54
time deposits. Our branch network is the principal source of core deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than
wholesale funds of comparable maturities. Community banking profitability has been favorably impacted in recent years as the
Company funded strong loan growth with a more desirable blend of funds.
Measurement of the allowance for credit losses. The Company adopted CECL as of January 1, 2020, which requires the
estimate of expected credit losses over the entire life of financial assets measured at amortized cost. To measure lifetime
expected credit losses, the Company adjusts credit loss estimates for reasonable and supportable forecasts of macroeconomic
conditions. Such forecasts can significantly impact the profitability of our community banks as changing estimates of lifetime
losses from period to period can result in significant fluctuations in provision for credit losses during those periods. In 2023,
such fluctuations in provision for credit losses unfavorably impacted the profitability of our community banks, primarily as a
result of deterioration in key variables (Baa credit spread and Commercial Real Estate Price Index) within forecasted
macroeconomic conditions.
Level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned. The level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned can
significantly impact our profitability as these loans and other real estate owned do not accrue any income, can be subject to
charge-offs and write-downs due to deteriorating market conditions and generally result in additional legal and collections
expenses. The Company’s credit quality measures have remained at historically low levels in recent years.
Mortgage banking revenue. Our community banking franchise is also influenced by the level of fees generated by the
origination of residential mortgages and the sale of such mortgages into the secondary market by Wintrust Mortgage. The
Company recognized a decrease of $72.1 million in mortgage banking revenue in 2023 compared to 2022 as origination
volumes declined and due to unfavorable fair value adjustments of MSRs in 2023 compared to 2022. Mortgage originations for
sale totaled $2.0 billion and $2.8 billion in 2023 and 2022, respectively, decreasing as increased interest rates reduced refinance
incentives for borrowers. Partially offsetting the impact of lower originations and production margins was the change in fair
value on EBOs guaranteed by U.S. government agencies.
Expansion of banking operations. Our historical financial performance has been affected by costs associated with growing
market share in deposits and loans, establishing and acquiring banks, opening new branch facilities and building an experienced
management team. Our financial performance generally reflects the improved profitability of our banking subsidiaries as they
mature, offset by the costs of establishing and acquiring banks and opening new branch facilities.
In determining the timing of the opening of additional branches of existing banks, and the acquisition of additional banks, we
consider many factors, particularly our perceived ability to obtain an adequate return on our invested capital driven largely by
the then existing cost of funds and lending margins, the general economic climate and the level of competition in a given
market.
In addition to the factors considered above, before we engage in expansion through de novo branches, we must first make a
determination that the expansion fulfills our objective of enhancing shareholder value through potential future earnings growth
and enhancement of the overall franchise value of the Company. Generally, we believe that, in normal market conditions,
expansion through de novo growth is a better long-term investment than acquiring banks because the cost to bring a de novo
location to profitability is generally substantially less than the premium paid for the acquisition of a healthy bank. Each
opportunity to expand is unique from a cost and benefit perspective. Both FDIC-assisted and non-FDIC-assisted acquisitions
offer a unique opportunity for the Company to expand into new and existing markets in a non-traditional manner. Potential
acquisitions are reviewed in a similar manner as a de novo branch opportunities, however, FDIC-assisted and non-FDIC-
assisted acquisitions have the ability to immediately enhance shareholder value. Factors including the valuation of our stock,
other economic market conditions, the size and scope of the particular expansion opportunity and competitive landscape all
influence the decision to expand via de novo growth or through acquisition.
Specialty Finance
Through our specialty finance segment, we offer financing of insurance premiums for businesses and individuals; lease
financing and other direct leasing opportunities; accounts receivable financing, value-added, out-sourced administrative
services; and other specialty finance businesses.
Financing of Commercial Insurance Premiums
The primary driver of profitability related to the financing of property and casualty insurance premiums is the net interest
spread that FIRST Insurance Funding and FIFC Canada can produce between the yields on the loans generated and the cost of
funds allocated to the business unit. The property and casualty insurance premium finance business is a competitive industry
55
and yields on loans are influenced by the market rates offered by our competitors. The majority of loans originated by FIRST
Insurance Funding are purchased by the banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as these loans generally
provide the banks with higher yields than alternative investments. We fund these loans primarily through our deposits, the cost
of which is influenced by competitors in the retail banking markets in our market area.
Financing of Life Insurance Premiums
The primary driver of profitability related to the financing of life insurance premiums is the net interest spread that Wintrust
Life Finance can produce between the yields on the loans generated and the cost of funds allocated to the business unit.
Profitability of financing both commercial and life insurance premiums is also meaningfully impacted by leveraging
information technology systems, maintaining operational efficiency and increasing average loan size, each of which allows us
to expand our loan volume without significant capital investment.
Wealth Management
Through our wealth management segment, we offer a full range of wealth management services through four separate
subsidiaries (CTC, Wintrust Investments, Great Lakes Advisors and CDEC): trust and investment services, tax-deferred like-
kind exchange services, asset management solutions, securities brokerage services and 401(k) and retirement plan services.
The primary drivers of profitability of the wealth management business can be associated with the level of commission received
related to the trading performed by the brokerage customers for their accounts and the amount of assets under management in
which the unit receives a management fee for advisory, administrative and custodial services. As such, revenues are influenced
by a rise or fall in the debt and equity markets and the resulting increase or decrease in the value of our client accounts on which
our fees are based. The commissions received by the brokerage unit are not as directly influenced by the directionality of the
debt and equity markets but rather the desire of our customers to engage in trading based on their particular situations and
outlooks of the market or particular stocks and bonds.
Financial Regulatory Reform
Our business is heavily regulated and supervised by both federal and state agencies. Both the scope of the laws and regulations
and the intensity of the supervision to which our business is subject have increased in recent years, initially in response to the
financial crisis, and more recently in light of other factors such as the regional banking uncertainty in early 2023, technological
updates, and market changes. Many of these changes have occurred as a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) and its implementing regulations, most of which are now in place. We expect
that our business will remain subject to extensive regulation and supervision.
The exact impact of the changing regulatory environment on our business and operations depends upon legislative or regulatory
changes to reform the financial regulatory framework and the actions of our competitors, customers, and other market
participants. Legislative and regulatory changes could have a significant impact on us by, for example, requiring us to change
our business practices; requiring us to meet more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements; limiting our ability
to pursue business opportunities; imposing additional costs and compliance obligations on us; limiting fees we can charge for
services; impacting the value of our assets; or otherwise adversely affecting our businesses and our earnings’ capabilities. We
have already experienced significant increases in compliance related costs in recent years, and we are now subject to more
stringent risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements than we were prior to the adoption of the U.S. Basel III Rules. We
are also now subject to many mortgage-related rules promulgated by the CFPB that materially restructured the origination,
services and securitization of residential mortgages in the United States. As discussed under Supervision and Regulation in Item
1, the FDIC adopted a final rule, applicable to all insured depository institutions, to increase initial base deposit insurance
assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points, beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. Additionally
there was a special assessment by the FDIC that was levied on banks with asset size above $5 billion to recoup losses from
certain bank failures that occurred earlier in 2023. We will continue to monitor the impact that the implementation of applicable
rules, regulations and policies arising out of any legislative or regulatory changes may have on our organization. For further
discussion of the laws and regulations applicable to us and our subsidiary banks, please refer to “Business-Supervision and
Regulation.”
56
Recent Transactions
Business Combination
On April 3, 2023, the Company completed its acquisition of Rothschild & Co Asset Management US Inc. and Rothschild & Co
Risk Based Investments LLC from Rothschild & Co North America Inc. As of the acquisition date, the Company acquired
approximately $12.6 million in net assets. As the transaction was determined to be a business combination, the Company
recorded goodwill of approximately $2.6 million on the purchase.
Common Stock Offering
In June 2022, the Company sold through a public offering a total of 3,450,000 shares of its common stock. Net Proceeds to the
Company total approximately $285.7 million, net of estimated issuance costs.
SUMMARY OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP in the United States, prevailing
practices of the banking industry, and the application of accounting policies of which are described in Note (1) “Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. These policies require numerous estimates
and strategic or economic assumptions, which may prove inaccurate or subject to variations. Changes in underlying factors,
assumptions or estimates could have material impact on the Company’s future financial condition and results of operations. At
December 31, 2023, management views critical accounting estimates to include the determination of the allowance for credit
losses, estimations of fair value, the valuations required for impairment testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for
derivative instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as
such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. These estimates were reviewed with the Audit
Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and are discussed more fully below.
Allowance for Credit Losses, including the Allowance for Loan Losses, Allowance for Losses on Lending-Related Commitments
and Allowance for Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities
The allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the life of a financial asset
carried at amortized cost. Determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting estimate
because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the fair value of the underlying collateral and amount
and timing of expected future cash flows on individually assessed financial assets, estimated credit losses on pools of loans with
similar risk characteristics, and consideration of reasonable and supportable forecasts of macroeconomic conditions, all of
which are susceptible to significant change. At December 31, 2023, the loan and held-to-maturity debt securities portfolios
represent 82% of total assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company also maintains an allowance for
lending-related commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, which relates to certain amounts
the Company is committed to lend (not unconditionally cancelable) but for which funds have not yet been disbursed.
Key macroeconomic variable data points that are significant inputs into our credit loss models for the commercial and
commercial real estate portfolios are the Baa corporate credit spread, as well as the Commercial Real Estate Pricing Index
(“CREPI”) specifically related to the commercial real estate portfolio. Holding all other inputs constant, the table below shows
the impact of changes in these key macroeconomic variable data points on the estimate of allowance for credit losses.
Impact to estimated allowance for credit losses from an increased or higher input value
Baa Credit Spread
CRE Price Index
Increases
Decreases
57
Holding all other inputs constant, the following table provides a sensitivity analysis for the commercial and commercial real
estate portfolios based on a 20 basis point change in Baa credit spreads from the assumption utilized in the estimate of that
portfolio’s allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2023:
Baa Credit Spread
Commercial
Commercial Real Estate:
Construction
Non-Construction
Narrows
Widens
Decreases estimate by 10%-15%
Increases estimate by 20%-25%
Decreases estimate by 15%-20%
Increases estimate by 15%-20%
Decreases estimate by 4%-5%
Increases estimate by 4%-5%
Holding all other inputs constant, the following table provides a sensitivity analysis for the commercial real estate construction
and non-construction portfolios based on a 10% change in CREPI from the assumption utilized in the estimate of that
portfolio’s allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2023:
CRE Price Index
Commercial Real Estate:
Construction
Non-Construction
Increases
Decreases
Decreases estimate by 45%-50%
Decreases estimate by 25%-30%
Increases estimate by 95%-100%
Increases estimate by 55%-60%
See Note (5) “Allowance for Credit Losses” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 and the section titled “Loan
Portfolio and Asset Quality” in Item 7 for a description of the methodology used to determine the allowance for credit losses.
Estimations of Fair Value
A portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, with
changes in fair value recorded either through earnings or other comprehensive income in accordance with applicable accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. These include the Company’s trading account securities, available-for-sale
debt securities, equity securities with a readily determinable fair value, derivatives, mortgage loans held-for-sale, certain loans
held-for-investment and mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”). The determination of fair value is important for certain other
assets, including goodwill and other intangible assets, loans individually assessed when measuring a related allowance for credit
loss, and other real estate owned that are periodically evaluated for impairment using fair value estimates.
Fair value is generally defined as the amount at which an asset or liability could be exchanged in a current transaction between
willing, unrelated parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value is based on quoted market prices in an active
market, or if market prices are not available, is estimated using models employing techniques such as matrix pricing or
discounting expected cash flows. The significant assumptions used in the models, which include assumptions for interest rates,
discount rates, prepayments and credit losses, are independently verified against observable market data where possible. Where
observable market data is not available, the estimate of fair value becomes more subjective and involves a high degree of
judgment. In this circumstance, fair value is estimated based on management’s judgment regarding the value that market
participants would assign to the asset or liability. This valuation process takes into consideration factors such as market
illiquidity. Imprecision in estimating these factors can impact the amount recorded on the balance sheet for a particular asset or
liability with related impacts to earnings or other comprehensive income. See Note (22) “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities”
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a further discussion of fair value measurements.
Impairment Testing of Goodwill
The Company performs impairment testing of goodwill for each of its reporting units on an annual basis or more frequently
when events warrant, using a qualitative or quantitative approach. Using a qualitative approach, the Company reviews any
recent events or circumstances that would indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount. These events and circumstances include the performance of the Company, the condition of the related industry
in which the reporting unit operates and general economic environment and other factors. If the Company determines it is not
more likely than not that there is impairment based on an evaluation of these events and circumstances, the Company may forgo
the quantitative approach.
58
Using a quantitative approach, the Company compares each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying value
of a reporting unit was determined to have been higher than its fair value, the Company would measure and recognize an
impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. Any impairment loss
would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. Valuations are estimated in good faith by
management through the use of publicly available valuations of comparable entities and discounted cash flow models using
internal financial projections in the reporting unit’s business plan.
Under both a qualitative and quantitative approach, the goodwill impairment analysis requires management to make subjective
judgments in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Events and factors that may significantly affect the
analysis include: a significant decline in the Company’s expected future cash flows, a substantial increase in the discount rate, a
sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization, a significant adverse change in legal
factors or in the business climate. Other factors might include changing competitive forces, customer behaviors and attrition,
revenue trends, cost structures, along with specific industry and market conditions. Adverse change in these factors could have
a significant impact on the recoverability of intangible assets and could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had three reporting units: Community Banking, Specialty Finance and Wealth
Management. Based on the Company’s 2023 annual goodwill impairment testing, which was performed qualitatively, the
Company concluded that the fair value of each reporting unit more likely than not exceeded the carrying amounts of the
respective reporting units.
Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage risks such as interest rate risk or market risk. The Company’s policy
prohibits using derivatives for speculative purposes.
Accounting for derivatives differs significantly depending on whether a derivative is designated as an accounting hedge, which
is a transaction intended to reduce a risk associated with a specific asset or liability or future expected cash flow at the time it is
purchased. In order to qualify as an accounting hedge, a derivative must be designated as such at inception by management and
meet certain criteria. Management must also continue to evaluate whether the instrument effectively reduces the risk associated
with that item. To determine if a derivative instrument continues to be an effective hedge, the Company must make assumptions
and judgments about the continued effectiveness of the hedging strategies and the nature and timing of forecasted transactions.
If the Company’s hedging strategy were to become ineffective, hedge accounting would no longer apply and the reported
results of operations or financial condition could be materially affected. See Note (21) “Derivative Financial Instruments” to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a further discussion of derivative accounting.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to the income tax laws of the United States, its states, Canada and other jurisdictions where it conducts
business. These laws are complex and subject to potentially different interpretations by the taxpayer and the various taxing
authorities. In determining the provision for income taxes, management must make judgments and estimates about the
application of these inherently complex laws, related regulations and case law. In the process of preparing the Company’s tax
returns, management attempts to make reasonable interpretations of the tax laws. These interpretations are subject to challenge
by the tax authorities upon audit or to reinterpretation based on management’s ongoing assessment of facts and evolving case
law. Management reviews its uncertain tax positions and recognition of the benefits of such positions on a regular basis.
On a quarterly basis, management assesses the reasonableness of its effective tax rate based upon its current best estimate of net
income and the applicable taxes expected for the full year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reassessed on a quarterly basis,
if business events or circumstances warrant. Additionally, any enactment of new tax rates requires the Company to re-measure
its existing deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the new tax rate, with such adjustments recognized in current year
earnings. See Note (17) “Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a further discussion of income
taxes.
59
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of Wintrust’s results of operations requires an understanding that a majority of the Company’s bank
subsidiaries have been started as de novo banks since December 1991. Wintrust has a strategy of continuing to build its
customer base and securing broad product penetration in each marketplace that it serves. The Company has expanded its
banking franchise from three banks with five offices in 1994 to 15 banks with 174 offices at the end of 2023. FIRST Insurance
Funding and Wintrust Life Finance have matured into separate divisions that generated, on a national basis, $16.1 billion in
total premium finance receivables in 2023 within the United States. FIFC Canada, acquired in 2012, originated $1.8 billion in
Canadian property and casualty premium finance receivables in 2023. The Company’s leasing business increased its portfolio
of assets, including direct financing leases, loans and equipment on operating leases, to $3.4 billion as of December 31, 2023. In
addition, the wealth management companies have been building a team of experienced professionals who are located within a
majority of the banks.
Earnings Summary
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2023, totaled $622.6 million, or $9.58 per diluted common share, compared to
$509.7 million, or $8.02 per diluted common share, in 2022, and $466.2 million, or $7.58 per diluted common share, in 2021.
During 2023, net income increased by $112.9 million and earnings per diluted common share increased by $1.56. Net interest
income increased in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily as a result of an increase in the net interest margin as well as growth in
average earning assets in 2023. Partially offsetting the increase to net income from higher net interest income was a higher
provision for credit losses. The Company’s provision for credit losses increased in 2023 primarily due to higher net charge-offs
coupled with deterioration of forecasted macroeconomic conditions used in the measurement of the allowance for credit losses.
Mortgage banking revenue decreased in 2023 as compared 2022 primarily as a result of unfavorable fair value adjustments of
MSRs, net of servicing hedge, and a decrease in loans originated for sale, partially offset by favorable adjustments to the
Company’s held-for-sale portfolio of EBOs guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, which are held at fair value.
Other items impacting net income in 2023 compared to 2022 include increased salary and employee benefits expenses and
higher FDIC insurance costs in 2023 primarily due to the FDIC special assessment in response to certain bank failures
occurring in 2023.
Net Interest Income
The primary source of the Company’s revenue is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest
income and fees on earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense on the liabilities to fund those assets,
including interest-bearing deposits and other borrowings. The amount of net interest income is affected by both changes in the
level of interest rates, and the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income in 2023 totaled $1.84 billion, up from $1.50 billion in 2022 and up from $1.12 billion in 2021, representing
an increase of $342.5 million, or 23%, in 2023 and an increase of $370.4 million, or 33%, in 2022. The table presented later in
this section, titled “Changes in Interest Income and Expense,” presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and
expense, by major category, attributable to changes in the volume of the balance sheet category and changes in the rate earned
or paid with respect to that category of assets or liabilities for 2023 and 2022.
Average earning assets increased $2.8 billion, or 6%, in 2023 and $3.6 billion, or 8%, in 2022. Loans are the most significant
component of the earning asset base as they earn interest at a higher rate than the majority of other earning assets. Average
loans increased $3.6 billion, or 10%, in 2023 and $3.6 billion, or 11%, in 2022. Total average loans as a percentage of total
average earning assets were 80%, 77% and 75% in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The average yield on loans was 6.32% in
2023, 4.12% in 2022 and 3.43% in 2021, reflecting an increase of 220 basis points in 2023 and an increase of 69 basis points in
2022. The higher loan yields in 2023 compared to 2022 is primarily a result of the increase in the interest rate environment in
2023 compared to 2022. The average yield on liquidity management assets was 3.53% in 2023, 2.15% in 2022 and 1.14% in
2021, reflecting an increase of 138 basis points in 2023 and an increase of 101 basis points in 2022. The higher yield in 2023
compared to 2022 is also a result of the increase in the interest rate environment in 2023 compared to 2022. The average rate
paid on interest-bearing deposits, the largest component of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities, was 2.81% in 2023,
0.62% in 2022 and 0.33% in 2021, representing an increase of 219 basis points in 2023 and an increase of 29 basis points in
2022. The higher level of interest-bearing deposits rates in 2023 compared to 2022 is also primarily a result of the increase in
the interest rate environment in 2023 compared to 2022. As a result of the above, net interest margin increased to 3.66% (3.68%
on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) in 2023 compared to 3.15% (3.17% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-
GAAP) in 2022.
60
Net interest income and net interest margin were also affected by amortization of valuation adjustments to earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities of acquired businesses. Assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are required to be recognized at
their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. These valuation adjustments represent the difference between the estimated
fair value and the carrying value of assets and liabilities acquired. These adjustments are amortized into interest income and
interest expense based upon the estimated remaining lives of the assets and liabilities acquired.
Average Balance Sheets, Interest Income and Expense, and Interest Rate Yields and Costs
The following table sets forth the average balances, the interest earned or paid thereon, and the effective interest rate, yield or
cost for each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2023,
2022 and 2021. The yields and costs include loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs that are considered
adjustments to yields. Interest income on non-accruing loans is reflected in the year that it is collected, to the extent it is not
applied to principal. Such amounts are not material to net interest income or the net change in net interest income in any year.
Non-accrual loans are included in the average balances. Net interest income and the related net interest margin have been
adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income, such as interest on municipal securities and loans, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis
(non-GAAP). This table should be referred to in conjunction with discussion of the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
61
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-bearing deposits with banks,
securities purchased under resale
agreements and cash equivalents (1)
Investment securities(2)
FHLB and FRB stock
Total liquidity management assets (3) (8)
Other earning assets (3) (4) (8)
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
Loans, net of unearned income (3) (5) (8)
Total earning assets (8)
Allowance for loan and investment
security losses
Cash and due from banks
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits — interest-bearing:
NOW and interest-bearing demand
deposits
Average Balance
for the years ended December 31,
Interest
for the years ended December 31,
Yield/Rate
for the years ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
2023
2022
2021
2023
2022
2021
$ 1,608,835
$ 3,323,196
$ 4,840,048
$
80,783
$
48,350
$
6,779
5.02 %
1.45 %
0.14 %
7,721,661
6,735,732
4,779,313
240,837
162,577
215,699
150,223
135,873
14,912
8,622
97,258
7,067
3.12
6.91
2.41
5.74
2.03
5.20
$ 9,546,195
$ 10,209,151
$ 9,755,234
$ 336,532
$ 219,549
$ 111,104
3.53 %
2.15 %
1.14 %
17,129
294,421
22,391
496,088
25,096
959,457
1,098
16,791
955
21,195
657
32,169
40,324,472
36,684,528
33,051,043
2,548,779
1,511,345
1,135,155
6.41
5.70
6.32
4.27
4.27
4.12
2.62
3.35
3.43
$ 50,182,217
$ 47,412,158
$ 43,790,830
$ 2,903,200
$ 1,753,044
$ 1,279,085
5.79 %
3.70 %
2.92 %
(308,724)
(256,690)
(284,163)
468,298
473,025
432,836
3,187,715
2,795,826
2,884,548
$ 53,529,506
$ 50,424,319
$ 46,824,051
$ 5,626,277
$ 5,355,077
$ 4,029,662
$ 122,074
$
27,566
$
Wealth management deposits
1,730,523
2,827,497
2,361,412
Money market accounts
13,665,248
12,254,159
11,801,788
Savings accounts
Time deposits
5,299,205
4,014,166
3,734,162
5,952,537
3,812,148
4,447,871
42,782
429,900
109,666
202,048
29,750
80,591
11,234
26,061
7,739
4,534
32,031
1,583
42,232
2.17 %
0.51 %
0.19 %
2.47
3.15
2.07
3.39
1.05
0.66
0.28
0.68
0.19
0.27
0.04
0.95
Total interest-bearing deposits
$ 32,273,790
$ 28,263,047
$ 26,374,895
$ 906,470
$ 175,202
$
88,119
2.81 %
0.62 %
0.33 %
FHLB advances
Other borrowings
Subordinated notes
Junior subordinated notes
2,316,722
1,484,663
1,236,478
630,115
437,604
253,566
485,820
437,139
253,566
514,657
436,697
253,566
72,287
35,280
22,023
19,190
30,329
14,294
22,004
10,252
19,581
9,928
21,983
10,916
3.12
5.60
5.03
7.57
2.04
2.94
5.03
4.10
1.58
1.93
5.03
4.25
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$ 35,911,797
$ 30,924,235
$ 28,816,293
$ 1,055,250
$ 252,081
$ 150,527
2.94 %
0.81 %
0.52 %
Non-interest-bearing deposits
11,018,596
13,667,879
12,638,518
Other liabilities
Equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’
equity
Interest rate spread (6) (8)
Less: fully taxable-equivalent adjustment
Net free funds/contribution (7)
Net interest income/margin (GAAP) (8)
Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment
Net interest income/margin fully taxable-
equivalent (non-GAAP) (8)
1,575,960
1,197,981
1,068,498
5,023,153
4,634,224
4,300,742
$ 53,529,506
$ 50,424,319
$ 46,824,051
$ 14,270,420
$ 16,487,923
$ 14,974,537
$
(10,086) $
(5,601) $
(3,601)
$ 1,837,864
$ 1,495,362
$ 1,124,957
10,086
5,601
3,601
2.85 %
2.89 %
2.40 %
(0.02)
0.83
3.66 %
0.02
(0.02)
0.28
3.15 %
0.02
(0.01)
0.18
2.57 %
0.01
$ 1,847,950
$ 1,500,963
$ 1,128,558
3.68 %
3.17 %
2.58 %
(1)
(2)
(3)
Includes interest-bearing deposits from banks and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of greater than three
months. Cash equivalents include federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of three months or
less.
Investment securities includes investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, and equity securities with readily determinable fair
values. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are included within other assets.
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading securities and investment securities reflects a tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal
federal corporate tax rate in effect as of the applicable period. The total adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were
$10.1 million, $5.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively.
(4) Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
(5) Loans, net of unearned income, include non-accrual loans.
(6)
(7) Net free funds is the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.
See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios” for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
(8)
62
Changes In Interest Income and Expense
The following table shows the dollar amount of changes in interest income and expense, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis
(non-GAAP), by major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities attributable to changes in volume or
rate for the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
Interest income, FTE basis (non-GAAP) (1)
Interest-bearing deposits with banks,
securities purchased under resale agreements
and cash equivalents (2)
Investment securities
FHLB and FRB stock
Total liquidity management assets
Other earning assets
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
Loans, net of unearned income
Total interest income
Interest Expense
Deposits — interest-bearing:
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits
Wealth management deposits
Money market accounts
Savings accounts
Time deposits
Total interest expense — deposits
FHLB advances
Other borrowings
Subordinated notes
Junior subordinated notes
Total interest expense
Less: fully taxable-equivalent adjustment
Net interest income (GAAP) (1)
Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment
Net interest income, FTE basis (non-
GAAP) (1)
2023 Compared to 2022
Change
Due to
Volume
Change
Due to
Rate
Total
Change
2022 Compared to 2021
Change
Due to
Volume
Change
Due to
Rate
Total
Change
$
67,201 $
52,257
2,005
$ 121,463 $
32,433 $ 42,784 $ (1,213) $ 41,571
(34,768) $
65,319
78,260
26,003
4,285
1,555
6,290
(4,480) $ 116,983 $ 64,016 $ 44,429 $ 108,445
298
(10,974)
376,190
$ 1,000,337 $ 149,819 $ 1,150,156 $ 313,916 $ 160,043 $ 473,959
(78)
(18,256)
133,948
(260)
(10,196)
164,755
376
7,282
242,242
403
5,792
872,679
44,858
784
143
(4,404)
20,461
771
1,037,434
$
93,047 $
28,052
338,999
93,740
154,153
$ 707,991 $
20,367
14,983
—
8,938
$ 752,279 $
(4,485)
$ 243,573 $
4,485
2,826
819
126
(4,559)
22,390
47,741
9,525
(11,612)
94,508 $ 12,267 $ 7,560 $ 19,827
1,461 $
25,216
13,032
(15,020)
48,560
349,309
10,310
9,651
98,432
4,692
21,834
(16,171)
175,987
23,277 $ 731,268 $ 80,311 $ 6,772 $ 87,083
10,748
21,591
4,366
6,003
21
19
(664)
—
50,890 $ 803,169 $ 90,952 $ 10,602 $ 101,554
(2,000)
98,929 $ 342,502 $ 220,964 $ 149,441 $ 370,405
2,000
4,392
(583)
21
—
6,356
4,949
—
(664)
41,958
20,986
19
8,938
(4,485)
(2,000)
2,000
4,485
—
—
—
—
$ 248,058 $
98,929 $ 346,987 $ 222,964 $ 149,441 $ 372,405
(1)
(2)
See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios” for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
Includes interest-bearing deposits from banks and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of greater than three
months. Cash equivalents include federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of three months or
less.
The changes in net interest income are created by changes in both interest rates and volumes. In the table above, volume
variances are computed using the change in volume multiplied by the previous year’s rate. Rate variances are computed using
the change in rate multiplied by the previous year’s volume. The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been
allocated between factors in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
63
Non-Interest Income
The following table presents non-interest income by category for 2023, 2022 and 2021:
Years ended December 31,
2023 compared to 2022
2022 compared to 2021
$
2023
18,645 $
111,962
2022
17,668 $
108,946
$ 130,607 $ 126,614 $ 124,019 $
155,173
2021
20,710 $
103,309
273,010
83,073
977
3,016
3,993
(72,100)
6 % $
3
3 % $
(3,042)
5,637
2,595
(117,837)
(46)
$ Change
% Change
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Brokerage
Trust and asset management
Total wealth management(1)
Mortgage banking
Service charges on deposit
accounts
Gains (losses) on investment
securities, net
Fees from covered call options
Trading gains, net
Operating lease income, net
Other:
Interest rate swap fees
BOLI
Administrative services
Foreign currency
remeasurement gains (losses)
Early pay-offs of capital leases
Miscellaneous
Total Other
Total Non-Interest Income
55,250
58,574
54,168
(3,324)
(6)
4,406
1,525
21,863
1,142
53,298
12,251
5,149
5,599
(20,427)
14,133
3,752
55,510
(1,059)
3,673
245
53,691
21,952
7,730
(2,610)
(2,212)
NM
55
(70)
(4)
(19,368)
10,460
3,507
1,819
12,185
806
6,713
13,702
5,812
5,689
66
4,343
(1,114)
1
NM
(17)
(1,517)
(5,006)
1,024
1,059
1,184
62,106
87,348 $
767
(495)
490
601
15,072
53,064
$
78,373 $ 19,624
$ 434,106 $ 461,053 $ 586,120 $ (26,947)
292
694
47,034
67,724 $
NM
787
93
71
(6,030)
32
29 % $ (10,649)
(6) % $ (125,067)
(15) %
5
2 %
(43)
8
NM
NM
NM
3
(11)
(86)
18
NM
15
(11)
(14) %
(21) %
(1) Wealth management revenue is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of the CTC and Great Lakes Advisors, the brokerage
commissions, managed money fees and insurance product commissions at Wintrust Investments and fees from tax-deferred like-kind exchange
services provided by CDEC.
NM—Not Meaningful
Notable contributions to the change in non-interest income are as follows:
Mortgage banking revenue decreased in 2023 as compared 2022 primarily as a result of unfavorable fair value adjustments of
MSRs, net of servicing hedge, and a decrease in loans originated for sale, partially offset by favorable adjustments to the
Company’s held-for-sale portfolio of early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, which are held at
fair value. Mortgage banking revenue includes revenue from activities related to originating, selling and servicing residential
real estate loans for the secondary market. A main factor in the mortgage banking revenue recognized by the Company is the
volume of mortgage loans originated or purchased for sale. Mortgage loans originated for sale totaled $2.0 billion for the year
ended 2023 compared to $2.8 billion for the same period of 2022. The decrease in originations was primarily due to increased
interest rates reducing refinance incentives for borrowers. The percentage of origination volume from refinancing activities was
17% in 2023 as compared to 29% in 2022.
The Company records MSRs at fair value on a recurring basis. During 2023, the fair value of the MSRs portfolio decreased due
to a reduction in value of $17.1 million due to payoffs and paydowns of the existing portfolio, an unfavorable fair value
adjustment of $19.1 million, and a bulk sale of MSRs of $30.2 million, partially offset by retained servicing rights which led to
capitalization of $28.6 million. See Note (6) “Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)” to the Consolidated Financial Statements
in Item 8 for a summary of the changes in the carrying value of MSRs.
Mortgage banking revenue is also impacted by changes in the fair value of derivative contracts held to economically hedge a
portion of the fair value adjustments related to the Company’s MSRs portfolio. The change in fair value of the derivative
contracts held as an economic hedge during 2023 was a $1.3 million favorable valuation adjustment compared to a $2.2 million
unfavorable valuation adjustment in 2022. The table below presents additional selected information regarding mortgage
banking for the respective periods.
64
(Dollars in thousands)
Originations:
Retail originations
Veterans First originations
Total originations for sale (A)
Originations for investment
Total originations
As a percentage of originations for sale:
Retail originations
Veterans First originations
Purchases
Refinances
Production Margin:
Production revenue (B) (1)
Total originations for sale (A)
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
$
$
1,387,423
574,782
1,962,205
578,571
2,540,776
$
$
$
1,978,609
820,391
2,799,000
944,389
3,743,389
$
$
$
5,104,277
1,699,500
6,803,777
931,169
7,734,946
71 %
29
83 %
17
71 %
29
71 %
29
$
41,031
$
44,153
$
1,962,205
2,799,000
Add: Current period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund
originations for sale (2)
Less: Prior period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund
originations for sale (2)
Total mortgage production volume (C)
Production margin (B / C)
119,624
113,303
113,303
353,509
$
1,968,526
$
2,558,794
$
2.08 %
1.73 %
Mortgage servicing:
Loans serviced for others (D)
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value (E)
Percentage of mortgage servicing rights to loans serviced for others (E/D)
Servicing income
$
12,007,165
$
14,052,596
$
192,456
1.60 %
43,563
230,225
1.64 %
44,080
Components of Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR):
MSR - current period capitalization
$
28,610
$
46,221
$
MSR - collection of expected cash flows - paydowns
MSR - collection of expected cash flows - payoffs
Valuation:
MSR - changes in fair value model assumptions
Changes in fair value of derivative contract held as an economic hedge, net
MSR valuation adjustment, net of changes in fair value of derivative
contract held as an economic hedge
Summary of Mortgage Banking Revenue:
Production revenue (1)
Servicing income
MSR activity
Changes in fair value on early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies and other revenue
Total mortgage banking revenue
$
$
$
(6,284)
(10,776)
(19,149)
1,280
(6,213)
(17,242)
60,064
(2,165)
(17,869)
$
57,899
$
$
41,031
43,563
(6,319)
4,798
$
44,153
44,080
80,665
(13,725)
83,073
$
155,173
$
75 %
25
45 %
55
176,242
6,803,777
353,509
1,072,717
6,084,569
2.90 %
13,126,254
147,571
1.12 %
40,686
72,754
(3,856)
(30,932)
18,273
—
18,273
176,242
40,686
56,239
(157)
273,010
(1) Production revenue represents revenue earned from the origination and subsequent sale of mortgages, including gains on loans sold and fees from
originations, changes in other related financial instruments carried at fair value, processing and other related activities, and excludes servicing fees,
changes in the fair value of servicing rights and changes to the mortgage recourse obligation and other non-production revenue.
(2) Certain volume adjusted for the estimated pull-through rate of the loan, which represents the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood that a
committed loan will ultimately fund.
65
Net gains on investment securities in 2023 were primarily the result of unrealized gains on equity investments. The Company
did not recognize any credit-related write-downs or other-than-temporary impairment charges within its available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio in 2023 or 2022, respectively.
The Company has typically written call options with terms of less than three months against certain U.S. Treasury and agency
securities held in its portfolio for liquidity and other purposes. Management has effectively entered into these transactions with
the goal of economically hedging security positions and enhancing its overall return on its investment portfolio. These option
transactions are designed to increase the total return associated with holding certain investment securities and do not qualify as
hedges pursuant to accounting guidance. There were no outstanding call option contracts at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) increased in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily as a result of upward adjustments to the
cash surrender value of BOLI policies. This income typically represents adjustments to the cash surrender value of BOLI
policies and proceeds received from death benefits. The Company initially purchased BOLI to consolidate existing term life
insurance contracts of executive officers and to mitigate the mortality risk associated with death benefits provided for in
executive employment contracts and in connection with certain deferred compensation arrangements. The Company has also
assumed additional BOLI policies as the result of the acquisition of certain banks. The cash surrender value of BOLI totaled
$160.2 million at December 31, 2023 and $157.3 million at December 31, 2022, and is included in other assets.
Miscellaneous non-interest income includes loan servicing fees, income from other investments, service charges and other fees.
The increased miscellaneous other income for 2023 compared to 2022 was primarily the result of decreased contingent
consideration accrued in 2023 related to previous acquisitions, $2.5 million of losses recorded in 2022 relating to the sale of a
property no longer considered for future expansion and losses on the sale of a former data processing facility in 2022, as well as
increased fee income in 2023 earned on card-related arrangements, letters of credit and other commitments.
66
8
1 %
10
(7)
(4)
14
26
12
(21)
6
(92)
64
18
17 %
4 %
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents non-interest expense by category for 2023, 2022 and 2021:
(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits:
Salaries
Years ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
2023 compared to 2022
2022 compared to 2021
$ Change % Change
$ Change
% Change
$ 438,812 $ 382,181 $ 361,915 $ 56,631
15 % $ 20,266
6 %
Commissions and incentive compensation
Benefits
182,101
127,100
197,873
116,053
222,067
107,687
(15,772)
11,047
(8)
10
(24,194)
(11)
8,366
Total salaries and employee benefits
$ 748,013 $ 696,107 $ 691,669 $ 51,906
7 % $
4,438
104,632
42,363
77,068
38,800
65,075
34,758
5,498
71,102
(1,528)
95,885
38,008
70,965
31,209
59,418
33,088
6,116
28,639
87,515
40,880
74,184
27,279
47,275
29,494
7,734
27,030
8,747
4,355
6,103
7,591
5,657
1,670
9
11
9
24
10
5
8,370
(2,872)
(3,219)
3,930
12,143
3,594
(618)
(10)
(1,618)
(140)
(1,654)
(1,388)
42,463
NM
NM
1,609
1,514
Software and equipment
Operating lease equipment
Occupancy, net
Data processing
Advertising and marketing
Professional fees
Amortization of other acquisition-related
intangible assets
FDIC insurance
OREO expenses, net
Other:
Lending expenses, net of deferred
origination costs
Travel and entertainment
Miscellaneous
Total other
21,096
21,194
84,428
20,576
16,506
80,894
22,794
10,048
68,296
520
4,688
3,534
3
28
4
(2,218)
(10)
6,458
12,598
$ 126,718 $ 117,976 $ 101,138 $
8,742
7 % $ 16,838
Total Non-Interest Expense
$ 1,312,499 $ 1,177,271 $ 1,132,544 $ 135,228
11 % $ 44,727
NM—Not Meaningful
Notable contributions to the change in non-interest expense are as follows:
Salaries and employee benefits is the largest component of non-interest expense, accounting for 57% of the total in 2023
compared to 59% in 2022. Salaries and employee benefits increased in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily as a result of
increased salaries and benefits expense as the Company grows, partially offset by decreased commissions and incentive
compensation expense primarily due to lower commission expense due to reduced mortgage production.
Software and equipment expense increased in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily as a result of increased software licensing
expenses as the Company invests in enhancements to the digital customer experience, upgrades to infrastructure and
enhancements to information security capabilities. Software and equipment expense includes furniture, equipment and
computer software, depreciation and repairs and maintenance costs.
Occupancy expense for the years 2023 and 2022 was $77.1 million and $71.0 million, respectively, reflecting an increase of 9%
in 2023. Occupancy expense includes depreciation on premises, real estate taxes and insurance, utilities and maintenance of
premises, as well as net rent expense for leased premises. In 2023, the Company recognized impairment totaling $2.9 million of
two Company-owned buildings that are no longer being used. Additionally, the increase was partly attributable to lower rental
income from the Company’s office space available for lease as well as higher maintenance, repairs and other costs at the
Company’s owned properties.
Data processing expense increased in 2023 compared to 2022 due to additional costs related to the termination of a duplicate
service contract related to the acquisition of a wealth management business in 2023. Further, the increase was attributable to
additional costs from certain system conversion processes completed in 2023.
Advertising and marketing costs are incurred to promote the Company’s brand, commercial banking capabilities, the
Company’s MaxSafe® suite of products, community-based products, to attract loans and deposits and to announce new branch
67
openings as well as the expansion of the Company’s non-bank businesses. The increased expense in 2023 compared to 2022
was primarily as a result of higher television and other media advertising costs as well as increased sponsorship activity. The
level of marketing expenditures depends on the type of marketing programs utilized which are determined based on the market
area, targeted audience, competition and various other factors. Management continues to utilize mass market media promotions
as well as targeted marketing programs in certain market areas.
FDIC insurance expense increased in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily due to the Company’s recognition of approximately
$34.4 million accrued for the estimated amount owed as a result of the FDIC special assessment on uninsured deposits in
response to certain bank failures occurring in 2023. The increase in expense is also due to the FDIC’s increase of the basis rate
beginning with the first quarterly assessment period in 2023 as well as asset growth.
Miscellaneous non-interest expense includes ATM expenses, correspondent banking charges, directors’ fees, telephone,
postage, corporate insurance, dues and subscriptions, problem loan expenses and other miscellaneous operational losses and
costs. Miscellaneous non-interest expense increased in 2023 as compared to 2022 primarily as a result of various other
operational costs including an increase in interest payments made on collateral received for outstanding interest rate derivative
contracts.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $222.5 million in 2023 compared to $190.9 million in 2022 and $171.6 million
2021. The effective tax rates were 26.3% in 2023, 27.2% in 2022 and 26.9% in 2021. The effective tax rate in 2023 is slightly
lower due to the Company’s income tax expense being impacted by an increase in federal tax credits claimed and an overall
lower level of provision for state income taxes versus the comparable periods. Income tax expense was also impacted by the tax
effects related to the issuance of shares in share-based compensation plans. These tax effects fluctuate based on the Company’s
stock price and timing of employee stock option exercises and vesting of other share based awards. The Company recorded a
net excess tax benefit related to share-based compensation of $2.9 million in 2023, a net excess tax benefit of $2.9 million
2022, and a net excess tax benefit of $2.4 million in 2021, the majority of which were recognized in the first quarter in each
year. Please refer to Note (17) “Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion and
analysis of the Company’s tax position, including a reconciliation of the tax expense computed at the statutory tax rate to the
Company’s actual tax expense.
Operating Segment Results
As described in Note (24) “Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, the Company’s
operations consist of three primary segments: community banking, specialty finance and wealth management. The Company’s
profitability is primarily dependent on the net interest income, provision for credit losses, non-interest income and operating
expenses of its community banking segment. For purposes of internal segment profitability, management allocates certain
intersegment and parent company balances. Management allocates a portion of revenues to the specialty finance segment
related to loans and leases originated by the specialty finance segment and sold or assigned to the community banking segment.
Similarly, for purposes of analyzing the contribution from the wealth management segment, management allocates a portion of
the net interest income earned by the community banking segment on deposit balances of customers of the wealth management
segment to the wealth management segment. Finally, expenses incurred at the Wintrust parent company are allocated to each
segment based on each segment’s risk-weighted assets.
The community banking segment’s net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2023 totaled $1.4 billion as compared
to $1.2 billion for the same period in 2022, an increase of $260.8 million, or 22%. The increase in 2023 compared to 2022 was
primarily attributable to increased interest and fees on loans due to loan growth and increased interest rates, partially offset by
increased interest expense on deposits. The community banking segment recorded a provision for credit losses of $104.9
million in 2023 compared to $74.2 million in 2022. The provision for credit losses increased in 2023 compared to 2022
primarily due to higher net charge-offs coupled with deterioration in the macroeconomic forecast and loan growth compared to
2022. Non-interest income for the community banking segment decreased $35.5 million, or 12% in 2023 when compared to
2022. The decrease in non-interest income in 2023 compared to 2022 was primarily the result of unfavorable fair value
adjustments of MSRs and reduced mortgage banking revenue due to lower originations for sale. The community banking
segment’s net income for the year ended December 31, 2023 totaled $414.1 million, an increase of $64.7 million, compared to
net income of $349.3 million in 2022. The increase was primarily attributable to higher net interest income in 2023 partially
offset by increased provision for credit losses and reduced mortgage banking revenue, as discussed above.
The specialty finance segment’s net interest income totaled $329.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to
$246.7 million in the same period of 2022, an increase of $82.4 million, or 33%. The increase in 2023 compared to 2022 was
primarily attributable to loan growth and increased interest rates on the premium finance receivables portfolios. The specialty
finance segment’s provision for credit losses totaled $9.5 million in 2023 compared to $4.4 million in 2022 primarily due to
68
higher net charge-offs coupled with deterioration in the macroeconomic forecast and loan growth compared to 2022. The
specialty finance segment’s non-interest income increased to $106.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to
$97.7 million in 2022. For 2023, our commercial premium finance operations, life insurance premium finance operations,
leasing operations and accounts receivable finance operations accounted for 44%, 35%, 18% and 3%, respectively, of the total
revenues of our specialty finance business. Net income of the specialty finance segment totaled $175.5 million and $120.9
million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The wealth management segment reported net interest income of $32.7 million for 2023 and $38.3 million for 2022. Net
interest income for this segment is primarily comprised of an allocation of net interest income earned by the community
banking segment on non-interest bearing and interest-bearing wealth management customer account balances on deposit at the
banks. Wealth management customer account balances on deposit at the banks averaged $1.7 billion and $2.8 billion in 2023
and 2022, respectively. This segment recorded non-interest income of $136.6 million for 2023 as compared to $124.6 million
for 2022. Distribution of wealth management services through each bank continues to be a focus of the Company as the number
of brokers in its banks continues to increase. The Company is committed to growing the wealth management segment in order
to better service its customers and create a more diversified revenue stream. The wealth management segment reported net
income of $33.0 million for 2023 compared to $39.4 million for 2022.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Total assets were $56.3 billion at December 31, 2023, representing an increase of $3.3 billion, or 6%, when compared to
December 31, 2022. Total funding, which includes deposits, all notes and advances, including secured borrowings and junior
subordinated debentures, was $49.1 billion at December 31, 2023 and $46.5 billion at December 31, 2022. See Notes (3), (4),
and (10) through (14) to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional period-end detail on the Company’s
interest-earning assets and funding liabilities.
Interest-Earning Assets
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning assets and the relative percentage of each
category to total average earning assets for the periods presented:
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
Loans:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables
Other loans
Total loans, net of unearned income (1)
Liquidity management assets (2)
Other earning assets (3)
Total average earning assets
Total average assets
Total average earning assets to total average
assets
2023
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
Balance
Percent
Balance
Percent
Balance
Percent
$
294,421
1 % $
496,088
1 % $
959,457
2 %
12,478,768
10,631,288
337,836
2,497,553
14,295,504
83,523
$ 40,324,472
9,546,195
25
21
1
11,897,776
9,432,526
327,506
1,968,333
5
12,993,677
28
64,710
0
80 % $ 36,684,528
10,209,151
19
25
20
1
11,746,381
8,696,887
371,425
1,455,883
4
10,734,726
27
45,741
0
77 % $ 33,051,043
9,755,234
22
17,129
0
22,391
0
25,096
27
20
1
3
24
0
75 %
23
0
$ 50,182,217
100 % $ 47,412,158
100 % $ 43,790,830
100 %
$ 53,529,506
$ 50,424,319
$ 46,824,051
94 %
94 %
94 %
(1) Includes non-accrual loans.
(2) Liquidity management assets include investment securities, other securities, interest-earning deposits with banks,
federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.
(3) Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
Total average earning assets increased $2.8 billion, or 6%, in 2023. Average earning assets comprised 94% of average total
assets in 2023 and 2022.
69
Mortgage loans held-for-sale. Average mortgage loans held-for-sale totaled $294.4 million in 2023, compared to $496.1
million in 2022. These balances represent mortgage loans awaiting subsequent sale in the secondary market with such sales
eliminating the interest-rate risk associated with these loans, as they are predominantly long-term fixed rate loans, and provides
a source of non-interest revenue. The decrease in average balance from 2022 to 2023 was primarily due to lower mortgage
origination production balances. See “Loan Portfolio and Asset Quality” section later in this Item 7 for additional discussion of
these early buyout options.
Loans, net of unearned income. Average total loans, net of unearned income, totaled $40.3 billion and increased $3.6 billion, or
10%, in 2023. Average commercial loans totaled $12.5 billion in 2023, and increased $581.0 million, or 5%, over the average
balance in 2022. Average commercial real estate loans totaled $10.6 billion in 2023, increasing $1.2 billion, or 13%, since
2022. Combined, these categories comprised 57% and 58% of the average loan portfolio in 2023 and 2022, respectively. The
growth realized in these categories for 2023 is primarily attributable to increased business development efforts during the
period.
Home equity loans averaged $337.8 million in 2023, and increased $10.3 million, or 3%, when compared to the average
balance in 2022. Unused commitments on home equity lines of credit totaled $845.6 million at December 31, 2023 and $796.9
million at December 31, 2022. The Company has been actively managing its home equity portfolio to ensure that diligent
pricing, appraisal and other underwriting activities continue to exist.
Residential real estate loans averaged $2.5 billion in 2023, and increased $529.2 million, or 27%, from the average balance in
2022. The increase in average balance was partially due to the Company deciding to allocate more balances from its mortgage
production for investment instead of for subsequent sale and servicing in the secondary market.
Average premium finance receivables totaled $14.3 billion in 2023, and accounted for 35% of the Company’s average total
loans. In 2023, average premium finance receivables increased $1.3 billion, or 10%, compared to 2022. The increase during
2023 was the result of effective marketing and customer servicing as well as continued originations within the portfolio due to
hardening insurance market conditions driving a higher average size of new property and casualty insurance premium finance
receivables. Approximately $17.9 billion of premium finance receivables were originated in 2023 compared to approximately
$15.4 billion in 2022.
Other loans represent a wide variety of personal and consumer loans to individuals. Consumer loans generally have shorter
terms and higher interest rates than mortgage loans but generally involve more credit risk due to the type and nature of the
collateral.
Liquidity Management Assets. Funds that are not utilized for loan originations are used to purchase investment securities and
short-term money market investments, to sell as federal funds and to maintain in interest-bearing deposits with banks. Average
liquidity management assets accounted for 19% and 22% of total average earning assets in 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Average liquidity management assets decreased $663.0 million in 2023 compared to 2022. The balances of these assets can
fluctuate based on management’s ongoing effort to manage liquidity and for asset liability management purposes. The
Company will continue to prudently evaluate and utilize liquidity sources as needed, including the management of availability
with the FHLB and FRB and utilization of the revolving credit facility with unaffiliated banks.
Other earning assets. Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities. In the normal
course of business, Wintrust Investments activities involve the execution, settlement, and financing of various securities
transactions. Wintrust Investments customer securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin
transactions, Wintrust Investments, under an agreement with the out-sourced securities firm, extends credit to its customer,
subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in customer’s accounts. In
connection with these activities, Wintrust Investments executes and the out-sourced firm clears customer transactions relating to
the sale of securities not yet purchased, substantially all of which are transacted on a margin basis subject to individual
exchange regulations. Such transactions may expose Wintrust Investments to off-balance-sheet risk, particularly in volatile
trading markets, in the event margin requirements are not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may incur. In the event
a customer fails to satisfy its obligations, Wintrust Investments under an agreement with the out-sourced securities firm, may be
required to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customer's obligations. Wintrust
Investments seeks to control the risks associated with its customers’ activities by requiring customers to maintain margin
collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines. Wintrust Investments monitors required margin levels
daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires customers to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.
70
Investment Securities Portfolio
Supplemental Statistical Data
The following statistical information is provided in accordance with the requirements of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the
SEC. This data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto, and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis which are contained in Item 8 and Item 7, respectively, of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investment securities portfolios, by investment
category, as of December 31, 2023, and 2022:
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Other
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial (multi-family) mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total available-for-sale securities
Held-to-maturity securities
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial (multi-family) mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Corporate notes
Total held-to-maturity securities
Less: Allowance for credit losses
Held-to-maturity securities, net of allowance for credit losses
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value
(1) None of our mortgage-backed securities are subprime.
2023
2022
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,960 $
50,000
144,299
6,968 $
45,124
140,958
14,943 $
80,000
173,861
83,996
1,000
75,540
991
93,994
1,000
14,948
74,222
168,655
84,703
1,002
3,505,012
13,201
175,346
3,979,814 $
3,059,620
12,980
160,734
3,502,915 $
3,308,494
—
97,342
3,769,634 $
2,819,937
—
79,550
3,243,017
336,468 $
172,933
269,410 $
169,720
339,614 $
179,027
264,321
175,438
3,042,828
6,415
241,075
57,544
3,857,263 $
(347)
3,856,916
143,312 $
2,495,485
6,231
220,551
54,071
3,215,468 $
$
139,268 $
2,316,349
—
140,829
52,884
2,949,821
2,900,031
—
164,151
58,232
3,641,055 $
(488)
3,640,567
115,552 $
110,365
71
Tables presenting the carrying amounts and gross unrealized gains and losses for securities at December 31, 2023 and 2022 are
included by reference to Note (3) “Investment Securities” to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented under Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table presents the carrying value of the investment securities portfolios as of
December 31, 2023, by maturity distribution. Carrying value represents the fair value of investment securities classified as
available-for-sale, the amortized cost of those classified as held-to-maturity and the fair value of equity securities with readily
determinable fair values.
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Other
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial (multi-family)
mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total available-for-sale securities
Held-to-maturity securities
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial (multi-family)
mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total held-to-maturity securities
Less: Allowance for credit losses
Held-to-maturity securities, net of
allowance for credit losses
Equity securities with readily
determinable fair value
$
$
Within 1
year
From 1 to
5 years
From 5 to
10 years
After 10
years
Mortgage-
backed
Equity
Securities
Total
$
5,956 $
—
46,989
1,012 $
—
56,877
—
—
—
—
—
65,105
991
—
—
—
52,945 $ 123,985 $
— $
— $
37,496
28,938
10,435
—
7,628
8,154
—
—
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
—
—
6,968
45,124
140,958
—
—
75,540
991
—
—
3,059,620
—
3,059,620
—
—
76,869 $
—
—
12,980
160,734
15,782 $ 3,233,334 $
12,980
—
160,734
—
— $ 3,502,915
1,057 $
4,112
1,725 $
65,299
— $ 333,686 $
84,734
18,788
— $
—
— $ 336,468
172,933
—
—
42,578
14,966
—
—
—
57,544
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
5,169 $ 109,602 $
—
—
3,042,828
—
3,042,828
—
—
—
—
99,700 $ 352,474 $ 3,290,318 $
6,415
241,075
6,415
—
—
241,075
— $ 3,857,263
(347)
$ 3,856,916
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $ 139,268 $ 139,268
(1) None of our mortgage-backed securities are subprime.
72
The weighted average yield calculated based on amortized cost for each range of maturities of securities, on a tax-equivalent
basis, is shown below as of December 31, 2023:
Within
1 year
From 1
to 5 years
From 5 to
10 years
After
10 years
Mortgage-
backed
Equity
Securities
Total
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Other
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial (multi-family)
mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total available-for-sale securities
Held-to-maturity securities
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial (multi-family)
mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total held-to-maturity securities
Equity securities with readily
determinable fair value
5.44 %
—
4.14
—
—
—
—
—
4.28 %
2.64 %
4.18
—
—
4.61 %
—
3.58
4.97
4.40
— %
4.00
3.89
3.49
—
—
—
—
—
4.33 %
2.54 %
4.02
—
—
3.89 %
— %
4.13
0.96
6.37
—
—
— %
2.87
3.93
—
—
—
—
—
3.42 %
3.09 %
4.28
—
—
—
—
3.86 %
—
—
2.81 %
—
—
4.47 %
—
—
3.15 %
— %
—
—
—
—
3.06
5.99
4.49
3.14 %
— %
—
—
2.51
3.92
3.96
2.62 %
— %
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— %
— %
—
—
—
—
—
— %
5.32 %
3.81
3.85
4.77
4.40
3.06
5.99
4.49
3.22 %
3.08 %
4.11
2.36
2.51
3.92
3.96
2.72 %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
0.46 %
0.46 %
(1) None of our mortgage-backed securities are subprime.
73
Loan Portfolio and Asset Quality
Loan Portfolio
Commercial and commercial real estate loans. Our commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios are comprised
primarily of commercial real estate loans and lines of credit for working capital purposes. The table below sets forth
information regarding the types, amounts and performance of our loans within these portfolios as of December 31, 2023 and
2022:
Commercial:
Commercial, industrial and other
Commercial Real Estate:
Construction and development
Non-construction
Total commercial real estate
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Balance
% of
Total
Balance
Allowance
For Credit
Losses Allocation
Balance
% of
Total
Balance
Allowance
For Credit
Losses Allocation
$ 12,832,053
53.1 % $
169,604 $ 12,549,164
55.7 % $
142,769
$ 2,084,041
9,260,123
8.6 % $
38.3
94,081 $ 1,486,930
8,464,017
129,772
$ 11,344,164
46.9 % $
223,853 $ 9,950,947
6.6 % $
37.7
44.3 % $
75,907
108,445
184,352
327,121
Total commercial and commercial real estate
$ 24,176,217
100.0 % $
393,457 $ 22,500,111
100.0 % $
Commercial real estate—collateral location by state:
Illinois
Wisconsin
Total primary markets
Indiana
Florida
Colorado
California
Ohio
Texas
Other
Total
$ 6,935,002
878,888
$ 7,813,890
367,215
337,771
267,369
251,509
224,588
219,163
1,862,659
$ 11,344,164
61.1 %
7.7
68.8 %
3.2
3.0
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.9
16.5
100.0 %
$ 6,628,968
864,479
$ 7,493,447
337,713
280,397
207,234
140,853
120,485
161,797
1,209,021
$ 9,950,947
66.6 %
8.7
75.3 %
3.4
2.8
2.1
1.4
1.2
1.6
12.2
100.0 %
We make commercial loans for many purposes, including working capital lines, which are generally renewable annually and
supported by business assets, personal guarantees and additional collateral. Such loans may vary in size based on customer
need. Commercial business lending is generally considered to involve a slightly higher degree of risk than traditional consumer
bank lending. Primarily as a result of growth in the portfolio and deteriorating macroeconomic conditions and expectations
between the two reporting dates primarily related to the Baa credit spread, our allowance for credit losses in our commercial
loan portfolio increased to $169.6 million as of December 31, 2023 compared to $142.8 million as of December 31, 2022.
Our commercial real estate loans are generally secured by a first mortgage lien and assignment of rents on the property. Since
most of our bank branches are located in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin, 68.8% of our commercial real
estate loan portfolio is located in this region as of December 31, 2023. We have been able to effectively manage our total non-
performing commercial real estate loans. As of December 31, 2023, our allowance for credit losses related to this portfolio was
$223.9 million compared to $184.4 million as of December 31, 2022. The increase in the allowance for credit losses is
primarily due to portfolio growth and the impact on the Company’s loan loss modeling from deteriorating macroeconomic
conditions and expectations between the two reporting dates primarily related to the Baa credit spread and the Commercial Real
Estate Price Index. The table below sets forth the commercial real estate loans by property type and owner vs. non-owner
occupied.
74
(In thousands)
Commercial
Real Estate:
Residential
construction
Commercial
construction
Land
Office
Industrial
Retail
Multi-family
Mixed use and
other
Total
commercial
real estate
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
Owner
Occupied
Non-
Owner
Occupied
% of
Total
Average
Size of
Loan
Owner
Occupied
Non-
Owner
Occupied
Average
Size of
Loan
% of
Total
Total
Total
$
3,790 $ 54,852 $
58,642
0 % $
814 $
2,027 $ 74,850 $
76,877
1 % $
938
85,353 1,644,584 1,729,937
15
9,663 285,799
295,462
272,171 1,183,246 1,455,417
840,056 1,295,820 2,135,876
316,527 1,020,990 1,337,517
111,005 2,704,906 2,815,911
3
13
19
12
25
5,351
1,813
56,176 1,045,922 1,102,098
11
3,795
10,132 297,823
307,955
1,386
302,280 1,034,896 1,337,176
1,602
784,049 1,052,227 1,836,276
1,176
335,719 968,725 1,304,444
1,199
136,208 2,424,501 2,560,709
3
13
19
13
26
1,760
1,258
1,417
1,141
1,079
481,345 1,034,057 1,515,402
13
1,170
425,925 999,487 1,425,412
14
1,126
$ 2,119,910 $ 9,224,254 $ 11,344,164 100 % $ 1,470 $ 2,052,516 $ 7,898,431 $ 9,950,947 100 % $ 1,295
The Company also participates in mortgage warehouse lending which is included above within commercial, industrial and
other, by providing interim funding to unaffiliated mortgage bankers to finance residential mortgages originated by such
bankers for sale into the secondary market. The Company’s loans to the mortgage bankers are secured by the business assets of
the mortgage companies as well as the specific mortgage loans funded by the Company, after they have been pre-approved for
purchase by third party end lenders. The Company may also provide interim financing for packages of mortgage loans on a
bulk basis in circumstances where the mortgage bankers desire to competitively bid on a number of mortgages for sale as a
package in the secondary market. Amounts advanced with respect to any particular mortgage loan are usually required to be
repaid within 21 days.
Home equity loans. The Company’s home equity loans and lines of credit are primarily originated by each of the bank
subsidiaries in their local markets where there is a strong understanding of the underlying real estate value. The Company’s
banks monitor and manage these loans, and conduct an automated review of all home equity lines of credit at least twice per
year. This review collects FICO and Bankruptcy scores for each home equity borrower and identifies situations where the credit
strength of the borrower is declining. When other specific events occur that may influence repayment, information such as tax
liens or judgments is collected. The bank subsidiaries use this information to manage loans that may be higher risk and to
determine whether to obtain additional credit information or updated property valuations. In a limited number of cases, the
Company may issue home equity credit together with first mortgage financing, and requests for such financing are evaluated on
a combined basis.
The rates we offer on new home equity lending are based on several factors, including appraisals and valuation due diligence, in
order to reflect inherent risk, and we place additional scrutiny on larger home equity requests. It is not our practice to advance
more than 85% of the appraised value of the underlying asset, which ratio we refer to as the loan-to-value ratio, or LTV ratio,
and a majority of the credit we previously extended, when issued, had an LTV ratio of less than 80%. Our home equity loan
portfolio has performed well in light of the ongoing volatility in the overall residential real estate market.
Residential real estate. The Company’s residential real estate portfolio includes one- to four-family adjustable rate mortgages,
construction loans to individuals and bridge financing loans for qualifying customers as well as certain long-term fixed rate
loans. As of December 31, 2023, our residential loan portfolio totaled $2.8 billion, or 7% of our total outstanding loans.
Our adjustable rate mortgages are often non-agency conforming. Adjustable rate mortgage loans decrease the interest rate risk
we face on our mortgage portfolio. However, this risk is not eliminated due to the fact that such loans generally provide for
periodic and lifetime limits on the interest rate adjustments among other features. Additionally, adjustable rate mortgages may
pose a higher risk of delinquency and default because they require borrowers to make larger payments when interest rates rise.
As of December 31, 2023, excluding early buyout loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, $15.4 million of our
residential real estate mortgages, or 0.6% of our residential real estate loan portfolio were classified as nonaccrual, no balances
were 90 or more days past due and still accruing, $25.3 million were 30 to 89 days past due or 1.0% and $2.6 billion were
current or 98.4%. We believe that since our loan portfolio consists primarily of locally originated loans, and since the majority
75
of our borrowers are longer-term customers with lower LTV ratios, we face a relatively low risk of borrower default and
delinquency.
Due to interest rate risk considerations, the Company generally sells in the secondary market loans originated with long-term
fixed rates, for which we receive fee income. The Company also selectively retains certain of these loans within the banks’ own
loan portfolios where they are non-agency conforming, or where the terms of the loans make them favorable to retain. A portion
of the loans we sold into the secondary market were sold with the servicing of those loans retained. The amount of loans
serviced for others as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $12.0 billion and $14.1 billion, respectively. All other mortgage
loans sold into the secondary market were sold without the retention of servicing rights.
The GNMA optional repurchase programs allow financial institutions acting as servicers to buyout individual delinquent
mortgage loans that meet certain criteria from the securitized loan pool for which the institution was the original transferor of
such loans. At the option of the servicer and without prior authorization from GNMA, the servicer may repurchase such
delinquent loans for an amount equal to the remaining principal balance of the loan. Under FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers
and Servicing,” this early buyout option is considered a conditional option until the delinquency criteria are met, at which time
the option becomes unconditional. When the Company is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans under the
unconditional repurchase option and the expected benefit of the potential repurchase is more than trivial, the loans can no
longer be reported as sold and must be brought back onto the balance sheet as loans at fair value, regardless of whether the
Company intends to exercise the early buyout option. These rebooked loans are reported as loans held-for-investment, part of
the residential real estate portfolio, with the offsetting liability being reported in accrued interest payable and other liabilities.
When the early buyout option on these rebooked GNMA loans is exercised, the repurchased loans continue to be carried at fair
value. Additionally, such loans typically transfer to mortgage loans held-for-sale at the time of early buyout as the Company’s
intent is to cure and resell such loans subsequent to repurchase from GNMA. If such intent to cure and resell changes
subsequent to early buyout, the Company reclassifies such loans as held-for-investment. Early buyout loan classified as held-
for-investment totaled $150.6 million at December 31, 2023 compared to $164.8 million at December 31, 2022. Such loans
consist of both the rebooked GNMA loans and the early buyout exercised loans classified as held-for-investment discussed
above. Rebooked GNMA loans held-for-investment amounted to $92.8 million at December 31, 2023, compared to $80.7
million at December 31, 2022. The increase in balance from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2023 was the result of higher
delinquencies between periods and less frequent exercising of the early buyout option by the Company. As of December 31,
2023, early buyout exercised loans held-for-investment totaled $57.8 million compared to $84.1 million as of December 31,
2022. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, early buyout exercised mortgage loans held-for-sale totaled $137.2 million and
$143.6 million, respectively. The decline in early buyout exercised mortgage loans held-for-sale relative to the prior year is
primarily due to the resale of mortgage loans to GNMA as well as the reclassification of certain loans to held-for-investment
classification due to an inability to resell due to continued delinquency.
It is not the Company’s current practice to underwrite, and there are no plans to underwrite subprime, Alt A, no or little
documentation loans, or option ARM loans. As of December 31, 2023, none of our mortgage loans consist of interest-only
loans.
Premium finance receivables — property & casualty. FIRST Insurance Funding and FIFC Canada originated approximately
$16.4 billion in property and casualty insurance premium finance receivables during 2023 as compared to approximately $13.6
billion in 2022. FIRST Insurance Funding and FIFC Canada makes loans to finance insurance premiums related to property
and casualty insurance policies. The loans are indirectly originated by working through independent medium and large
insurance agents and brokers located throughout the United States and Canada. The insurance premiums financed are primarily
for commercial customers’ purchases of liability, property and casualty and other commercial insurance. This lending involves
relatively rapid turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan originations. The Company performs ongoing credit and
other reviews of the agents and brokers, and performs various internal audit steps to mitigate against the risk of fraud. The
majority of these loans are purchased by the banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as these loans generally
provide the banks with higher yields than alternative investments.
Premium finance receivables — life insurance. Wintrust Life Finance originated approximately $1.5 billion in life insurance
premium finance receivables in 2023 as compared to $1.8 billion in 2022. The Company continues to experience a high level of
competition and pricing pressure within the current market. These loans are originated directly with the borrowers with
assistance from life insurance carriers, independent insurance agents, financial advisors and legal counsel. The life insurance
policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these loans often are secured with a letter of credit, marketable securities or
certificates of deposit. In some cases, Wintrust Life Finance may make a loan that has a partially unsecured position.
Consumer and other. Included in the consumer and other loan category is a wide variety of personal and consumer loans to
individuals. The Company originates consumer loans in order to provide a wider range of financial services to its customers.
76
Consumer loans generally have shorter terms and higher interest rates than mortgage loans but generally involve more credit
risk than mortgage loans due to the type and nature of the collateral.
Foreign. The Company had approximately $920.4 million of loans to businesses with operations in foreign countries as of
December 31, 2023 compared to $745.6 million at December 31, 2022. This balance as of December 31, 2023 consists of loans
originated by FIFC Canada.
Loan Concentrations
Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities
which would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. The Company had no concentrations of
loans exceeding 10% of total loans at December 31, 2023, except for loans included in the specialty finance operating segment,
which are diversified throughout the United States and Canada.
77
Maturities and Sensitivities of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates
The following table classifies the loan portfolio at December 31, 2023 by date at which the loans reprice or mature, and the type
of rate exposure:
(In thousands)
Commercial
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total commercial
Commercial real estate
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total commercial real estate
Home equity
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total home equity
Residential real estate
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total residential real estate
Premium finance receivables - property & casualty
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total premium finance receivables - property
& casualty
Premium finance receivables - life insurance
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total premium finance receivables - life
insurance
Consumer and other
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total consumer and other
Total per category
Fixed rate
Variable rate
Total loans, net of unearned income
Variable Rate Loan Pricing by Index:
SOFR tenors
One- year CMT
Prime
Ameribor tenors
Other U.S. Treasury tenors
Other
Total variable rate
SOFR - Secured Overnight Financing Rate
CMT - Constant Maturity Treasury Rate
Ameribor - American Interbank Offered Rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
One year or
less
From one to
five years
From five to
fifteen years
After fifteen
years
Total
520,408 $
7,606,936
8,127,344 $
2,954,554 $
1,172
2,955,726 $
1,720,913 $
—
1,720,913 $
28,070 $
—
5,223,945
7,608,108
28,070 $ 12,832,053
646,873 $
7,233,835
7,880,708 $
2,870,147 $
17,377
2,887,524 $
525,167 $
39
525,206 $
50,726 $
—
4,092,913
7,251,251
50,726 $ 11,344,164
9,863 $
330,091
339,954 $
3,994 $
—
3,994 $
— $
—
— $
28 $
—
28 $
13,885
330,091
343,976
19,921 $
75,107
95,028 $
3,412 $
286,511
289,923 $
30,814 $
1,047,862 $
1,306,039
1,336,853 $
—
1,047,862 $
1,102,009
1,667,657
2,769,666
6,785,201 $
—
118,328 $
—
$
6,785,201 $
118,328 $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
6,903,529
—
— $
6,903,529
$
78,342 $
7,180,894
614,816 $
—
3,891 $
—
— $
—
697,049
7,180,894
$
7,259,236 $
614,816 $
3,891 $
— $
7,877,943
$
$
11,994 $
41,482
53,476 $
6,550 $
—
6,550 $
10 $
—
10 $
464 $
—
464 $
19,018
41,482
60,500
$
8,072,602 $
22,468,345
$ 30,540,947 $
6,571,801 $
305,060
6,876,861 $
2,280,795 $
1,306,078
3,586,873 $
1,127,150 $ 18,052,348
24,079,483
1,127,150 $ 42,131,831
—
$ 13,331,910
6,133,619
3,430,421
341,747
37,997
803,789
$ 24,079,483
With its transition from LIBOR, the Company increased the portion of its loan portfolio with interest rate indices that are an
alternative to LIBOR during the period, including emerging indices such as SOFR, CMT, and Ameribor. As shown above, at
December 31, 2023, variable rate loans with loans priced at SOFR, CMT and Ameribor totaled $13.3 billion, $6.1 billion and
$341.7 million, respectively.
78
Past Due Loans and Non-Performing Assets
The Company’s ability to manage credit risk depends in large part on its ability to properly identify and manage problem loans.
To do so, the Company operates a credit risk rating system under which credit management personnel assign a credit risk rating
(1 to 10 rating, with higher scores indicating higher risk) to each loan at the time of origination and review loans on a regular
basis. For loans measured at amortized cost, these credit risk ratings are also an important aspect of the Company’s allowance
for credit losses measurement methodology. The credit risk rating structure and classifications are shown below:
1 Rating
—
Minimal Risk (Loss Potential — none or extremely low) (Superior asset quality, excellent
liquidity, minimal leverage)
2 Rating
—
Modest Risk (Loss Potential demonstrably low) (Very good asset quality and liquidity, strong
leverage capacity)
3 Rating
—
Average Risk (Loss Potential low but no longer refutable) (Mostly satisfactory asset quality and
liquidity, good leverage capacity)
4 Rating
—
Above Average Risk (Loss Potential variable, but some potential for deterioration) (Acceptable
asset quality, little excess liquidity, modest leverage capacity)
5 Rating
—
Management Attention Risk (Loss Potential moderate if corrective action not taken) (Generally
acceptable asset quality, somewhat strained liquidity, minimal leverage capacity, minimum for all
commercial real estate construction loans)
6 Rating
—
Special Mention (Loss Potential moderate if corrective action not taken) (Assets in this category
are currently protected, potentially weak, but not to the point of substandard classification)
7 Rating
—
Substandard Accrual (Loss Potential distinct possibility that the bank may sustain some loss, but
no discernible impairment) (Must have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of
the debt)
8 Rating
—
Substandard Non-accrual (Loss Potential well documented probability of loss, including potential
impairment) (Must have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt)
9 Rating
—
Doubtful (Loss Potential extremely high) (These assets have all the weaknesses in those classified
“substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in
full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions, and values, highly improbable)
10 Rating
—
Loss (fully charged-off) (Loans in this category are considered fully uncollectible.)
Generally, each loan officer is responsible for monitoring his or her loan portfolio, recommending a credit risk rating for each
loan in his or her portfolio and ensuring the credit risk ratings are appropriate. These credit risk ratings are then ratified by the
bank’s chief credit officer and/or concurrence credit officer. Credit risk ratings are determined by evaluating a number of
factors including: a borrower’s financial strength, cash flow coverage, collateral protection and guarantees. The Company
maintains an internal loan review function to independently review a portion of the loan portfolio to evaluate the
appropriateness of the management-assigned credit risk ratings. These ratings are subject to further review at each of our bank
subsidiaries by the applicable regulatory authority, including the FRB of Chicago and the OCC, and are also reviewed by our
internal loan review staff and our internal audit staff.
The Company’s Problem Loan Reporting system includes all such loans described above with credit risk ratings of 6 through 9.
This system is designed to provide an on-going detailed tracking mechanism for each problem loan. Once management
determines that a loan has deteriorated to a point where it has a credit risk rating of 6 or worse, the Company’s Managed Asset
Division performs an overall credit and collateral review. As part of this review, all underlying collateral is identified and the
valuation methodology is analyzed and tracked. As a result of this initial review by the Company’s Managed Asset Division,
the credit risk rating is reviewed and a portion of the outstanding loan balance may be deemed uncollectible and, as a result, no
longer share similar risk characteristics as its related pool. If that is the case, the individual loan is considered collateral
dependent and individually assessed for an allowance for credit loss. The Company’s individual assessment utilizes an
79
independent re-appraisal of the collateral (unless such a third-party evaluation is not possible due to the unique nature of the
collateral, such as a closely-held business or thinly traded securities). In the case of commercial real estate collateral, an
independent third party appraisal is ordered by the Company’s Real Estate Services Group to determine if there has been any
change in the underlying collateral value. These independent appraisals are reviewed by the Real Estate Services Group and
sometimes by independent third party valuation experts and may be adjusted depending upon market conditions.
Through the credit risk rating process, such loans are reviewed to determine if they are performing in accordance with the
original contractual terms. If the borrower has failed to comply with the original contractual terms, further action may be
required by the Company, including a downgrade in the credit risk rating, movement to non-accrual status or a charge-off. If the
Company determines that a loan amount or portion thereof is uncollectible, the loan’s credit risk rating is immediately
downgraded to an 8 or 9 and the uncollectible amount is charged-off. Any loan that has a partial charge-off continues to be
assigned a credit risk rating of an 8 or 9 for the duration of time that a balance remains outstanding. The Company undertakes a
thorough and ongoing analysis to determine if additional impairment and/or charge-offs are appropriate and to begin a workout
plan for the credit to minimize actual losses. In determining the appropriate charge-off for collateral-dependent loans, the
Company considers the results of appraisals for the associated collateral.
The Company’s approach to workout plans and restructuring loans is built on the credit-risk rating process. A modification of a
loan with an existing credit risk rating of 6 or worse or a modification of any other credit, which will result in a restructured
credit risk rating of 6 or worse must be reviewed for enhanced loan modifications that now must be disclosed in accordance
with ASU 2022-02. In that event, our Managed Assets Division conducts an overall credit and collateral review. A modification
of a loan is considered to be enhanced if both (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and (2) for economic or legal
reasons, the bank grants a concession to a borrower that it would not otherwise consider. The modification of a loan where the
credit risk rating is 5 or better both before and after such modification is not considered to be an enhanced modification. Based
on the Company’s credit risk rating system, it considers that borrowers whose credit risk rating is 5 or better are not
experiencing financial difficulties and therefore, are not considered enhanced modifications.
Loan modifications are assessed at the time of the modification and on a quarterly basis to measure an allowance for credit loss.
The carrying amount of the loan is compared to the expected payments to be received, discounted at the loan’s original rate, or
for collateral dependent loans, to the fair value of the collateral. Any shortfall is recorded as a reserve.
For loans that do not meet the criteria listed above for enhanced modifications, if based on current information and events, it is
probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due to it according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement, a loan is individually assessed for measuring the allowance for credit losses and if necessary, a reserve is
established. In determining the appropriate reserve for collateral-dependent loans, the Company considers the results of
appraisals for the associated collateral.
Non-Performing Assets (1)
The following table sets forth the Company’s non-performing assets, and for the years prior to 2023, the TDRs performing
under the contractual terms of the loan agreement as of the dates shown. Reporting periods prior to the adoption of ASU
2022-02 as of January 1, 2023 present information on loan modifications representing TDRs under the prior accounting
standards and related disclosure requirements. Prior to January 1, 2020, Purchased Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) loans were
aggregated into pools by common risk characteristics for accounting purposes, including recognition of interest income on a
pool basis. As a result of the implementation of CECL, beginning in the first quarter of 2020, PCI loans transitioned to a
classification of Purchased Credit Deteriorated (“PCD”) loans, which no longer maintains the prior pools and related accounting
concepts. Recognition of interest income on PCD loans is considered at the individual asset level following the Company’s
accrual policies, instead of based upon the entire pool of loans. Due to the adoption of CECL, the Company included
$22.6 million of PCD loans in total non-performing loans as of December 31, 2020.
80
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing(2):
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Consumer and other
$
Total loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing
$
Non-accrual loans(3):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Consumer and other
Total non-accrual loans
Total non-performing loans(4):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Consumer and other
Total non-performing loans
Other real estate owned
Other real estate owned – from acquisitions
Other repossessed assets
Total non-performing assets
$
$
$
$
98
—
—
—
20,135
—
54
20,287
38,940
35,459
1,341
15,391
27,590
—
22
118,743
39,038
35,459
1,341
15,391
47,725
—
76
139,030
13,309
—
—
152,339
$
462
—
—
—
15,841
17,245
49
$
33,597
35,579
6,387
1,487
10,171
13,470
—
6
67,100
$
$
36,041
6,387
1,487
10,171
29,311
17,245
55
$ 100,697
8,589
1,311
—
$ 110,597
Accruing TDRs not included within non-performing assets
N/A
$
36,620
Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its
own respective category’s period-end balance:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Consumer and other
Total non-performing loans
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
Total non-accrual loans as a percentage of total loans
Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related
commitment losses as a percentage of
nonaccrual loans
0.30 %
0.31
0.39
0.56
0.69
—
0.13
0.33 %
0.27 %
0.28 %
0.29 %
0.06
0.45
0.43
0.50
0.21
0.11
0.26 %
0.21 %
0.17 %
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
15
—
—
—
7,210
7
137
7,369
20,399
21,746
2,574
16,440
5,433
—
477
67,069
20,414
21,746
2,574
16,440
12,643
7
614
74,438
1,959
2,312
—
78,709
37,486
0.17 %
0.24
0.77
1.00
0.26
0.00
2.54
0.21 %
0.16 %
0.19 %
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
307
—
—
—
12,792
—
264
13,363
21,743
46,107
6,529
26,071
13,264
—
436
114,150
22,050
46,107
6,529
26,071
26,056
—
700
127,513
9,711
6,847
—
144,071
47,023
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
11,517
—
163
11,680
37,224
26,113
7,363
13,797
20,590
590
231
105,908
37,224
26,113
7,363
13,797
32,107
590
394
117,588
5,208
9,963
4
132,763
36,725
0.18 %
0.54
1.54
2.07
0.64
—
2.17
0.40 %
0.32 %
0.36 %
0.45 %
0.33
1.44
1.02
0.93
0.01
0.36
0.44 %
0.36 %
0.40 %
359.82 %
532.71 %
446.78 %
332.82 %
149.62 %
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Excludes early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the FHA or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to
indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.
As of December 31, 2022, no TDRs were past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest. As of December 31, 2021, approximately $320,000 of TDRs were past due greater than 90 days
and still accruing interest. No TDRs as of December 31, 2020, and 2019 were past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest.
Non-accrual loans included TDRs totaling $4.5 million, $11.8 million, $21.2 million and $27.1 million as of December 31, 2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
Includes PCD loans. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Company transitioned all previously classified PCI loans to PCD loans effective January 1, 2020.
At this time, management believes reserves are appropriate to absorb losses that are expected upon the ultimate resolution of
these credits. Management will continue to actively review and monitor its loan portfolios, in an effort to identify problem
credits in a timely manner.
81
Loan Portfolio Aging
As of December 31, 2023, $69.9 million, or 0.2% of all loans, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies, were 60 to 89 days (or two payments) past due and $227.6 million, or 0.5%, were 30 to 59 days (or one payment) past
due. As of December 31, 2022, $47.9 million, or 0.1%, of all loans, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies were 60 to 89 days (or two payments) past due and $209.0 million, or 0.5%, were 30 to 59 days (or one
payment) past due. Many of the commercial and commercial real estate loans shown as 60 to 89 days and 30 to 59 days past
due are included on the Company’s internal problem loan reporting system. Loans on this system are closely monitored by
management on a monthly basis.
The Company’s home equity and residential loan portfolios continue to exhibit low delinquency ratios. Home equity loans at
December 31, 2023 that are current with regard to the contractual terms of the loan agreement represent 98.9% of the total
home equity portfolio. Residential real estate loans, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, at
December 31, 2023 that are current with regards to the contractual terms of the loan agreements comprise 98.4% of these
residential real estate loans outstanding.
For more information regarding delinquent loans as of December 31, 2023, see Note (5) “Allowance for Credit Losses” in Item
8.
Non-performing Loans Rollforward, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies
The table below presents a summary of non-performing loans for the periods presented:
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Additions from becoming non-performing in the respective period
Return to performing status
Payments received
Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets
Charge-offs, net
Net change for niche loans (1)
Balance at period end
2023
2022
$
$
100,697 $
123,377
(27,011)
(34,063)
(8,252)
(16,346)
628
139,030 $
74,438
72,243
(3,050)
(60,936)
(9,538)
(6,027)
33,567
100,697
(1) This includes activity for premium finance receivables and indirect consumer loans.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses, specifically the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitment losses,
represents management’s estimate of lifetime expected credit losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for credit losses is
determined quarterly using a methodology that incorporates important risk characteristics of each loan, as described below
under “How We Determine the Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Item 7.
82
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for credit losses by major loan type and the percentage of loans in
each category to total loans for the past five fiscal years:
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
(Dollars in
thousands)
Allowance for credit losses allocation:
Amount
% of
Loan Type to
Total
Loans
% of
Loan Type
to
Total
Loans
Amount
% of
Loan Type
to
Total
Loans
Amount
% of
Loan Type
to
Total
Loans
Amount
% of
Loan Type
to
Total
Loans
Amount
Commercial
Commercial
real-estate
Home equity
Residential
real-estate
Premium
finance
receivables –
property &
casualty
Premium
finance
receivables –
life insurance
Consumer and
other
Total
allowance for
credit losses
$ 169,604
30 % $ 142,769
32 % $ 119,307
34 % $ 94,212
37 % $ 64,920
31 %
223,853
27
184,352
25
144,583
26
243,603
7,116
13,133
12,384
685
490
1
7
16
19
0
7,573
11,585
1
6
10,699
8,782
1
5
11,437
12,459
9,967
15
15,246
14
17,267
704
498
21
0
613
423
20
0
510
422
26
1
5
13
18
0
68,511
3,878
9,800
30
2
5
8,132
13
1,515
1,705
19
0
$ 427,265
100 % $ 357,448
100 % $ 299,653
100 % $ 379,910
100 % $ 158,461
100 %
Allowance category as a percent of total
allowance for credit losses:
Commercial
Commercial
real-estate
Home equity
Residential
real-estate
Premium
finance
receivables—
property &
casualty
Premium
finance
receivables—
life insurance
Consumer and
other
Total
allowance for
credit losses
40 %
52
2
3
3
0
0
40 %
52
2
3
3
0
0
40 %
48
4
3
5
0
0
25 %
64
3
3
5
0
0
41 %
43
3
6
5
1
1
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
Management determined that the allowance for credit losses was appropriate at December 31, 2023, and that the loan portfolio
is well diversified and well secured, without undue concentration in any specific risk area. While this process involves a high
degree of management judgment, the allowance for credit losses is based on a comprehensive, well documented, and
consistently applied analysis of the Company’s loan portfolio. This analysis takes into consideration all available information
existing as of the financial statement date, including environmental factors such as economic, industry, geographical and
political factors, when considered applicable. The relative level of allowance for credit losses is reviewed and compared to
industry peers. This review encompasses levels of total non-performing loans, portfolio mix, portfolio concentrations and
overall levels of net charge-off. Historical trending of both the Company’s results and the industry peers is also reviewed to
analyze comparative significance.
83
Allowance for Credit Losses
The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for credit losses, specifically related to loans and unfunded
lending-related commitments, during the last five fiscal years.
(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of year
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
$ 357,448
$
299,653
$
379,910
$
158,461
$
154,164
Cumulative effect adjustment from the adoption of ASU 2016-13
Provision for credit losses
Initial allowance for credit losses recognized on PCD assets
acquired during the period (1)
Other adjustments
Charge-offs:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Consumer and other
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Consumer and other
Total recoveries
Net charge-offs
Allowance for credit losses at year end
Net charge-offs (recoveries) by category as a percentage of its
own respective category’s average:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Consumer and other
Total loans, net of unearned income
Net charge-offs as a percentage of the provision for credit losses
Year-end total loans
741
114,531
—
47
15,713
15,228
227
192
21,684
173
595
—
78,179
—
(108)
14,141
1,379
432
471
14,240
35
1,081
—
(59,280)
47,344
214,235
470
3
20,801
3,293
336
1,082
9,020
—
487
—
179
18,293
15,960
2,061
891
15,472
—
528
—
53,864
—
(21)
35,880
5,402
3,702
798
12,902
—
522
$
53,812
$
31,779
$
35,019
$
53,205
$
59,206
2,651
460
139
21
4,930
16
93
4,748
701
319
77
5,522
—
136
2,559
1,304
1,203
330
7,989
—
184
5,092
1,835
528
184
5,108
—
149
$
$
8,310
(45,502)
$ 427,265
$
$
$
11,503
(20,276)
357,448
$
$
$
13,569
(21,450)
299,653
$
$
$
12,896
(40,309)
379,910
$
$
$
2,845
2,516
479
422
3,203
—
195
9,660
(49,546)
158,461
0.10 %
0.08 %
0.14
0.03
0.01
0.27
0.00
0.60
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.16
0.00
1.22
0.11 %
39.73 %
0.06 %
25.94 %
0.16 %
0.02
(0.23)
0.05
0.02
—
0.66
0.06 %
NM
0.12 %
0.41 %
0.17
0.33
0.06
0.27
—
0.52
0.04
0.61
0.04
0.30
—
0.29
0.13 %
18.82 %
0.20 %
91.99 %
$ 42,131,831
$ 39,196,485
$ 34,789,104
$ 32,079,273
$ 26,800,290
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at end of year
0.82 %
0.69 %
0.71 %
1.00 %
0.59 %
Allowance for loan and unfunded loan-related commitment
losses as a percentage of loans at end of year
Allowance for loan and unfunded loan-related commitment
losses as a percentage of loans at end of year, excluding PPP
loans
1.01
1.01
0.91
0.91
0.86
0.88
1.18
1.29
0.59
0.59
(1) The initial allowance for credit losses on PCD loans acquired during the period measured approximately $2.8 million, of which approximately $2.3
million was charged off related to PCD loans that met the Company’s charge-off policy at the time of acquisition. After considering these loans that were
immediately charged off, the net impact of PCD allowance for credit losses at the acquisition date was approximately $470,000 in 2021.
NM—Not Meaningful
The allowance for credit losses, as related to loans and lending-related commitments, is comprised of an allowance for loan
losses, which is determined with respect to loans that we have originated, and an allowance for unfunded commitment losses. A
separate allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses is measured related to such debt securities portfolio. Our allowance for
unfunded commitment losses is determined with respect to funds that we have committed to lend but for which funds have not
84
yet been disbursed and is computed using a methodology similar to that used to determine the allowance for loan losses. The
allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments totaled $83.0 million as of December 31, 2023 compared to $87.3 million
as of December 31, 2022.
Additions to the allowance for credit losses are charged to earnings through the provision for credit losses. Charge-offs
represent the amount of loans that have been determined to be uncollectible during a given period, and are deducted from the
allowance for credit losses, and recoveries represent the amount of collections received from loans that had previously been
charged off, and are credited to the allowance for credit losses. See Note (5) “Allowance for Credit Losses” of the Consolidated
Financial Statements presented under Item 8 of this report for further discussion of activity within the allowance for credit
losses during the period and the relationship with respective loan balances for each loan category and the total loan portfolio.
How We Determine the Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective or pooled basis by loans that share similar risk characteristics. If the
loan no longer exhibits risk characteristics similar to that of a pool, typically due to credit deterioration of the related borrower,
the Company analyzes the loan for purposes of individually assessing a specific allowance for credit loss as part of the Problem
Loan Reporting system review. A separate reserve is collectively measured for loans continuing to share risk characteristics
and, as a result, remaining in the pools. See Note (5) “Allowance for Credit Losses” of the Consolidated Financial Statements
presented under Item 8 of this report for further discussion of the allowance for credit losses measurement process.
Collective Measurement
The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective or pooled basis when similar risk characteristics exist, based upon
the segmentation discussed above. The Company utilizes modeling methodologies that estimate lifetime credit loss rates on
each pool, including methodologies estimating the probability of default and loss given default on specific segments. Historical
credit loss history is adjusted for reasonable and supportable forecasts developed by the Company on a quantitative or
qualitative basis and incorporates third party economic forecasts. Reasonable and supportable forecasts consider the
macroeconomic factors that are most relevant to evaluating and predicting expected credit losses in the Company's financial
assets. Currently, the Company utilizes an eight quarter forecast period using a single macroeconomic scenario provided by a
third party and reviewed within the Company's governance structure. For periods beyond the ability to develop reasonable and
supportable forecasts, the Company reverts to historical loss rates at an input level, straight-line over a four quarter reversion
period. Expected credit losses are measured over the contractual term of the financial asset with consideration of expected
prepayments. Expected extensions, renewals or modifications of the financial asset are considered when the expected extension,
renewal or modification is contained within the existing agreement and is not unconditionally cancelable. The methodologies
discussed above are applied to both current asset balances on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Condition and off-
balance sheet commitments (i.e. unfunded lending-related commitments).
Individual Assessment
Loans with a credit risk rating of a 6 through 9 are reviewed on a monthly basis to determine if (a) an amount is deemed
uncollectible (a charge-off) or (b) it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect amounts due in accordance with the
original contractual terms of the loan. In cases in which collectability is not probable, the loan is considered to no longer exhibit
shared risk characteristics of a pool and as a result, is individually assessed for allowance for credit losses measurement
purposes. If a loan is individually assessed credit risk rating 8 or 9, the carrying amount of the loan is compared to the expected
payments to be received, discounted at the loan’s original rate, or for foreclosure-probable and collateral dependent loans, to the
fair value of the collateral less the estimated cost to sell, when appropriate under accounting rules. Any shortfall is recorded as a
specific reserve within the allowance for credit losses.
Home Equity, Residential Real Estate and Consumer Loans
The determination of the appropriate allowance for credit losses for home equity, residential real estate and consumer loans
differs from the process used for commercial and commercial real estate loans. These portfolios utilize the weighted-average
remaining maturity (“WARM”) methodology. The WARM methodology is an assumption-based approach that utilizes
historical loss and prepayment information as the basis to estimate prepayment and credit adjusted contractual cash flows. The
Company considers a qualitative factor to adjust historical information for current conditions and reasonable and supportable
forecasts. The same credit risk rating system and Problem Loan Reporting systems are used. The only significant difference is
in how the credit risk ratings are assigned to these loans.
85
The home equity loan portfolio is reviewed on a loan by loan basis by analyzing current FICO and Bankruptcy scores of the
borrowers, line availability, recent line usage, approaching maturity, and the aging status of the loan. Certain of these factors, or
combination of these factors, may cause a portion of the credit risk ratings of home equity loans across all banks to be
downgraded. Similar to commercial and commercial real estate loans, once a home equity loan’s credit risk rating is
downgraded to a 6 through 9, the Company’s Managed Asset Division reviews and advises the subsidiary banks as to collateral
valuations and as to the ultimate resolution of the credits that deteriorate to a non-accrual status to minimize losses.
Residential real estate loans that are downgraded to a credit risk rating of 6 through 9 also enter the problem loan reporting
system and have the underlying collateral evaluated by the Managed Assets Division.
Premium Finance Receivables
The determination of the appropriate allowance for credit losses for premium finance receivables is an assumption-based
approach focusing on historical loss rates in the portfolio, adjusted qualitatively for current macroeconomic conditions and
reasonable and supportable forecasts.
Methodology in Assessing Impairment and Charge-off Amounts
In determining the amount of reserves or charge-offs associated with collateral dependent loans, the Company values the loan
generally by starting with a valuation obtained from an appraisal of the underlying collateral and then deducting estimated
selling costs, if appropriate, to arrive at a net appraised value. We obtain the appraisals of the underlying collateral typically on
an annual basis from one of a pre-approved list of independent, third party appraisal firms. Types of appraisal valuations
include “as-is,” “as-complete,” “as-stabilized,” bulk, fair market, liquidation and “retail sellout” values.
In many cases, the Company simultaneously values the underlying collateral by marketing the property to market participants
interested in purchasing properties of the same type. If the Company receives offers or indications of interest, we will analyze
the price and review market conditions to assess whether in light of such information the appraised value overstates the likely
price and that a lower price would be a better assessment of the market value of the property and would enable us to liquidate
the collateral. Additionally, the Company takes into account the strength of any guarantees or other credit enhancements, and
the ability of the borrower to provide value related to those guarantees in determining the ultimate charge-off or reserve
associated with any individually assessed loans. Accordingly, the Company may charge-off a loan to a value below the net
appraised value if it believes that an expeditious liquidation is desirable in the circumstance and it has legitimate offers or other
indications of interest to support a value that is less than the net appraised value. Alternatively, the Company may carry a loan
at a value that is in excess of the appraised value if the Company has a guarantee from a borrower or other credit enhancements
that the Company believes has realizable value. In evaluating the strength of any guarantee, the Company evaluates the
financial wherewithal of the guarantor, the guarantor’s reputation, and the guarantor’s willingness and desire to work with the
Company. The Company then conducts a review of the strength of a guarantee on a frequency established as the circumstances
and conditions of the borrower warrant.
In circumstances where the Company has received an appraisal but has no third party offers or indications of interest, the
Company may enlist the input of realtors in the local market as to the highest valuation that the realtor believes would result in a
liquidation of the property given a reasonable marketing period of approximately 90 days. To the extent that the realtors’
indication of market clearing price under such scenario is less than the net appraised valuation, the Company may take a charge-
off on the loan to a valuation that is less than the net appraised valuation.
The Company may also charge-off a loan below the net appraised valuation if the Company holds a junior mortgage position in
a piece of collateral whereby the risk to acquiring control of the property through the purchase of the senior mortgage position
is deemed to potentially increase the risk of loss upon liquidation due to the amount of time to ultimately market the property
and the volatile market conditions. In such cases, the Company may abandon its junior mortgage and charge-off the loan
balance in full.
In other cases, the Company may allow the borrower to conduct a “short sale,” which is a sale where the Company allows the
borrower to sell the property at a value less than the amount of the loan. Many times, it is possible for the current owner to
receive a better price than if the property is marketed by a financial institution which the market place perceives to have a
greater desire to liquidate the property at a lower price. To the extent that we allow a short sale at a price below the value
indicated by an appraisal, we may take a charge-off beyond the value that an appraisal would have indicated.
86
Other market conditions may require a reserve to bring the carrying value of the loan below the net appraised valuation such as
litigation surrounding the borrower and/or property securing our loan or other market conditions impacting the value of the
collateral.
Having determined the net value based on the factors such as those noted above and compared that value to the book value of
the loan, the Company arrives at a charge-off amount or a specific reserve included in the allowance for credit losses. In
summary, for collateral dependent loans, appraisals are used as the fair value starting point in the estimate of net value.
Estimated costs to sell are deducted from the appraised value, when appropriate under current accounting rules, to arrive at the
net appraised value. Although an external appraisal is the primary source of valuation utilized for charge-offs on collateral
dependent loans, alternative sources of valuation may become available between appraisal dates. As a result, we may utilize
values obtained through these alternative sources, which include purchase and sale agreements, legitimate indications of
interest, negotiated short sales, realtor price opinions, sale of the note or support from guarantors, as the basis for charge-offs.
These alternative sources of value are used only if deemed to be more representative of value based on updated information
regarding collateral resolution. In addition, if an appraisal is not deemed current, a discount to appraised value may be utilized.
Any adjustments from appraised value to net value are detailed and justified in an impairment analysis, which is reviewed and
approved by the Company’s Managed Assets Division.
Potential Problem Loans
Management believes that any loan where there are serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the
present loan repayment terms should be identified as a non-performing loan and should be included in the disclosure of “Past
Due Loans and Non-Performing Assets.” At end of the periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company
had no potential problem loans not already identified as non-performing.
Other Real Estate Owned
In certain circumstances, the Company is required to take action against the real estate collateral of specific loans. The
Company uses foreclosure only as a last resort for dealing with borrowers experiencing financial hardships. The Company
employs extensive contact and restructuring procedures to attempt to find other solutions for our borrowers. The tables below
present a summary of other real estate owned and show the activity for the respective periods and the balance for each property
type:
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Disposal/resolved
Transfers in at fair value, less costs to sell
Fair value adjustments
Balance at period end
(In thousands)
Residential real estate
Commercial real estate
Total
Deposits and Other Funding Sources
Years Ended
December 31,
December 31,
2023
2022
9,900 $
(5,051)
8,564
(104)
13,309 $
4,271
(3,954)
10,018
(435)
9,900
Period End
December 31,
December 31,
2023
720 $
12,589
13,309 $
2022
1,585
8,315
9,900
$
$
$
$
Total deposits at December 31, 2023, were $45.4 billion, increasing $2.5 billion, or 6%, compared to the $42.9 billion at
December 31, 2022. Average deposit balances in 2023 were $43.3 billion, reflecting an increase of $1.4 billion, or 3%,
compared to the average balances in 2022.
87
The increase in year end and average deposits in 2023 over 2022 is primarily attributable to the Company's increased marketing
efforts during 2023 to retain and attract deposits to support continued loan growth, and due to the diversity of our deposit base.
The Company has experienced a change in the mix of deposits as non-interest bearing deposits have migrated to interest-
bearing products as rates paid on deposits increased substantially in 2023 due to the rise in market rates. Average non-interest
bearing deposits decreased $2.6 billion, or 19% in 2023 compared to 2022, with period end balances ending at 23% of total
deposits at December 31, 2023, compared to 30% at December 31, 2022.
The following table presents the composition of average deposits by product category for each of the last three years:
(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest bearing deposits
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits
Wealth management deposits
Money market accounts
Savings accounts
Time certificates of deposit
Total average deposits
2023
Balance
$ 11,018,596
5,626,277
1,730,523
13,665,248
5,299,205
5,952,537
$ 43,292,386
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
Percent
Balance
Percent
Balance
25 % $ 13,667,879
5,355,077
13
2,827,497
4
12,254,159
32
4,014,166
12
14
3,812,148
100 % $ 41,930,926
32 % $ 12,638,518
4,029,662
13
2,361,412
7
11,801,788
29
3,734,162
10
4,447,871
9
100 % $ 39,013,413
Percent
33 %
10
6
30
10
11
100 %
Wealth management deposits are funds from the brokerage customers of Wintrust Investments, CDEC and trust and asset
management customers of the Company which have been placed into deposit accounts of the banks (“wealth management
deposits” in the table above). Wealth management deposits consist primarily of money market accounts. Consistent with
reasonable interest rate risk parameters, these funds have generally been invested in loan production of the banks as well as
other investments suitable for banks.
Other Funding Sources. Although deposits are the Company’s primary source of funding its interest-earning assets, the
Company’s ability to manage the types and terms of deposits is somewhat limited by customer preferences and market
competition. As a result, in addition to deposits and the issuance of equity securities and the retention of earnings, the Company
uses several other funding sources to support its growth. These sources include FHLB advances, notes payable, short-term
borrowings, secured borrowings, subordinated debt, and junior subordinated debentures. The Company evaluates the terms and
unique characteristics of each source, as well as its asset-liability management position, in determining the use of such funding
sources.
Uninsured deposits are estimated based on the methodologies and assumptions used for the Company’s regulatory reporting
requirements. In accordance with the instructions described in the FDIC’s July 24, 2023 Financial Institution Letter: Estimated
Uninsured Deposits Reporting Expectations, the Company had approximately $15.2 billion of uninsured deposits as of
December 31, 2023, of which $2.3 billion were fully collateralized deposits. The net position of $12.9 billion of uninsured and
uncollateralized deposits represents approximately 28% of total deposits as of December 31, 2023. The Company had total
liquidity sources, including cash and collateralized funding sources of $15.1 billion or approximately 117% of uninsured and
uncollateralized deposits as of December 31, 2023.
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of the average balances of other funding sources for the periods
presented:
88
(Dollars in thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
Subordinated notes
Notes payable
Short-term borrowings
Other
Secured borrowings
Total other borrowings
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
Average
Balance
Percent
of Total
Average
Balance
Percent
of Total
$
2,316,722
437,604
64 % $
12
1,484,663
437,139
188,900
17,893
60,149
363,173
630,115
5
0
2
10
17
7
100 % $
77,984
14,492
62,193
331,151
485,820
253,566
2,661,188
56 %
16
3
1
2
12
18
10
100 %
Junior subordinated debentures
Total other funding sources
253,566
3,638,007
$
FHLB advances provide the banks with access to fixed-rate funds which are useful in mitigating interest rate risk and achieving
an acceptable interest rate spread on fixed-rate loans or securities. FHLB advances to the banks totaled $2.3 billion at
December 31, 2023 and $2.3 billion at December 31, 2022. See Note (11) “Federal Home Loan Bank Advances” to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of the terms of these advances.
Notes payable balances represent the balances on a credit agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with certain
unaffiliated banks. The Credit Agreement consists of a $200.0 million term loan facility and a $100.0 million revolving credit
facility. As of December 31, 2023, the outstanding principal balance under the term loan facility was $171.3 million and there
was no outstanding principal balance under the revolving credit facility. See Note (13) “Other Borrowings” to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of notes payable.
Short-term borrowings include securities sold under repurchase agreements of customer sweep accounts in connection with
master repurchase agreements at the banks. These borrowings totaled $13.4 million and $17.6 million at December 31, 2023
and 2022, respectively. This funding category typically fluctuates based on customer preferences and daily liquidity needs of
the banks, their customers and the banks’ operating subsidiaries. See Note (13) “Other Borrowings” to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of these borrowings.
The balance of secured borrowings primarily represents a third party Canadian transaction (“Canadian Secured Borrowing”).
Under the Canadian Secured Borrowing, the Company, through its subsidiary, FIFC Canada, sells an undivided co-ownership
interest in all receivables owed to FIFC Canada to an unrelated third party in exchange for cash payments pursuant to a
receivables purchase agreement (“Receivables Purchase Agreement”). See Note (13) “Other Borrowings” to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of these secured borrowings under this agreement. At December 31, 2023
and 2022, the translated balance of the secured borrowings totaled $392.5 million and $309.7 million, respectively.
Other borrowings at December 31, 2023 represent a fixed-rate promissory note (“Fixed-Rate Promissory Note”) issued by the
Company in June 2017. Amendments to the Fixed-Rate Promissory Note since issuance increased the principal amount to
$66.4 million, reduced the interest rate to 1.70%, and extended the maturity date to March 31, 2025. The Fixed-Rate
Promissory Note relates to and is secured by three office buildings owned by the Company. At December 31, 2023 and 2022,
the Fixed-Rate Promissory Note had a balance of $59.2 million and $61.3 million, respectively. See Note (13) “Other
Borrowings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of these borrowings.
At December 31, 2023 and 2022, subordinated notes totaled $437.9 million and $437.4 million, respectively. During 2019, the
Company issued $300.0 million of subordinated notes receiving $296.7 million in proceeds, net of underwriting discount. The
notes have a stated interest rate of 4.85% and mature in June 2029. During 2014, the Company issued $140.0 million of
subordinated notes receiving $139.1 million in proceeds, net of underwriting discount. The notes have a stated interest rate of
5.00% and mature in June 2024. See Note (12) “Subordinated Notes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for
further discussion.
The Company had $253.6 million of junior subordinated debentures outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. The
amounts reflected on the balance sheet represent the junior subordinated debentures issued to eleven trusts by the Company and
equal the amount of the preferred and common securities issued by the trusts. See Note (14) “Junior Subordinated Debentures”
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures.
Starting in 2016, none of the junior subordinated debentures qualified as Tier 1 regulatory capital of the Company resulting in
89
$245.5 million of the junior subordinated debentures, net of common securities, being included in the Company’s Tier 2
regulatory capital as of December 31, 2023.
Shareholders’ Equity. Total shareholders’ equity was $5.4 billion at December 31, 2023, an increase of $602.7 million from the
December 31, 2022 total of $4.8 billion. The increase in 2023 was primarily a result of net income of $622.6 million, $33.5
million of stock-based compensation costs credited to surplus, $35.4 million in net unrealized gains from investment securities,
net of tax, $24.7 million of net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax, and $6.4 million of foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of tax. These increases to total shareholders’ equity were partially offset by common stock dividends of $97.7
million and preferred stock dividends of $28.0 million. See Note (23) “Shareholders’ Equity” to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of shareholders’ equity.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company and the banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements established by the federal banking agencies
that take into account risk attributable to balance sheet and off-balance sheet activities. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory — and possibly discretionary — actions by regulators, that if undertaken could
have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. The Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of
qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, of which at least 4.5% must be in the form of Common Equity Tier 1
capital and 6.0% must be in the form of Tier 1 capital. The Federal Reserve also requires a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1
capital to total assets of greater than 4.0%. In addition, the Federal Reserve continues to consider the Tier 1 leverage ratio in
evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities.
The following table summarizes the capital guidelines for bank holding companies as of December 31, 2023, as well as certain
ratios relating to the Company’s equity and assets as of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
Risk-based capital ratios:
Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio
Total capital ratio
Other ratios:
Total average equity to total average assets
Dividend payout ratio
Minimum
Ratio +
Capital
Conservation
Buffer (1)
Minimum
Well
Capitalized
Ratios (2)
Minimum
Ratios
4.0 %
N/A
N/A
2022
2023
9.3 % 8.8 %
2021
8.0 %
6.0
4.5
8.0
N/A
N/A
8.50
7.00
10.50
N/A
N/A
6.0
N/A
10.0
10.3
9.4
12.1
N/A
9.4
N/A 16.7
10.0
9.1
11.9
9.2
17.0
9.6
8.6
11.6
9.2
16.4
(1) Reflects the Capital Conservation Buffer of 2.50%.
(2) Reflects the well-capitalized standard applicable to the Company for purposes of the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y.
The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for BHCs to reflect the higher capital
requirements imposed under the U.S. Basel III Rule or to add Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio and Tier 1 leverage
ratio requirements to this standard. As a result, the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio and Tier 1 leverage ratio are
denoted as “N/A” in this column. If the Federal Reserve were to apply the same or a very similar well-capitalized
standard to BHCs as the standard applicable to our subsidiary banks, the Company’s capital ratios as of
December 31, 2023 would exceed such revised well-capitalized standard.
As reflected in the table, each of the Company’s capital ratios at December 31, 2023, exceeded the well-capitalized ratios
established by the Federal Reserve. Management is committed to maintaining the Company’s capital levels above the “Well
Capitalized” levels established by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies. Refer to Note (19) “Regulatory Matters” to
the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information on the capital positions of the banks.
The Company’s principal sources of funds at the holding company level are dividends from its subsidiaries, borrowings under
its loan agreement with unaffiliated banks and proceeds from the issuances of subordinated debt and additional equity. Refer to
Notes (12), (13), (14) and (23) to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information on the Company’s
subordinated notes, other borrowings, junior subordinated debentures and shareholders’ equity, respectively.
90
In January, April, July and October of 2023 and 2022, Wintrust declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.41 per share and
$429.69 per share of Series D and Series E Preferred Stock, respectively.
The payment of common stock dividends is also subject to statutory restrictions and restrictions arising under the terms of the
Company’s Series D and Series E Preferred Stock, the Company’s trust preferred securities offerings units and under certain
financial covenants in the Company’s revolving and term credit facilities. Under the terms of these separate revolving and term
credit facilities, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends on any equity interests, including its common stock and
preferred stock, if such payments would cause the Company to be in default under its facilities or exceed a certain threshold. In
January, April, July and October of 2023, Wintrust declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.40 per common share. In January,
April, July and October of 2022, Wintrust declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.34 per common share. In January of 2024,
Wintrust declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.45 per common share. Taking into account the limitations on the payment of
dividends, the final determination of timing, amount and payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Company’s Board of
Directors and will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors.
In June 2022, the Company sold a total of 3,450,000 shares of its common stock through a public offering. Net proceeds to the
Company totaled approximately $285.7 million, net of estimated issuance costs.
Banking laws impose restrictions upon the amount of dividends that can be paid to the holding company by the banks. Based on
these laws, the banks could, subject to minimum capital requirements, declare dividends to the Company without obtaining
regulatory approval in an amount not exceeding (a) undivided profits, and (b) the amount of net income reduced by dividends
paid for the current and prior two years.
Since the banks are required to maintain their capital at the well-capitalized level (due to the Company being a financial holding
company), funds otherwise available as dividends from the banks are limited to the amount that would not reduce any of the
banks’ capital ratios below the well-capitalized level. During 2023, 2022 and 2021, the subsidiaries paid $360.0 million, $52.0
million and $145.0 million, respectively, in dividends to the Company. As of December 31, 2023, subject to minimum capital
requirements at the banks, approximately $941.2 million was available as dividends from the banks without prior regulatory
approval and without compromising the banks’ well-capitalized positions.
Liquidity management at the banks involves planning to meet anticipated funding needs at a reasonable cost. Liquidity
management is guided by policies, formulated and monitored by the Company’s senior management and each Bank’s asset/
liability committee, which take into account the marketability of assets, the sources and stability of funding and the level of
unfunded commitments. The banks’ principal sources of funds are deposits, short-term borrowings and capital contributions
from the holding company. In addition, the banks are eligible to borrow under FHLB advances and at the FRB Discount
Window, another source of liquidity.
In accordance with the liquidity management noted above, deposit growth and increases in borrowings from various sources
have resulted in accumulating liquidity assets in recent periods. In 2023, we managed our liquid assets to ensure that we have
the balance sheet strength to serve our clients. As a result, the Company believes that it has sufficient funds and access to funds
to meet its working capital and other needs. The Company will continue to prudently evaluate liquidity sources, including the
management of availability with the FHLB and FRB and utilization of the revolving credit facility with unaffiliated banks.
Core deposits are the most stable source of liquidity for community banks due to the nature of long-term relationships generally
established with depositors and the security of deposit insurance provided by the FDIC. Core deposits are generally defined in
the industry as total deposits less time deposits with balances greater than $100,000. Due to the affluent nature of many of the
communities that the Company serves, management believes that many of its time deposits with balances in excess of $100,000
are also a stable source of funds. Currently, standard deposit insurance coverage is $250,000 per depositor per insured bank, for
each account ownership category.
While the Company obtains a portion of its total deposits through brokered deposits, the Company does so primarily as an
asset-liability management tool to assist in the management of interest rate risk, and the Company does not consider brokered
deposits to be a vital component of its current liquidity resources. Historically, brokered deposits have represented a small
component of the Company’s total deposits outstanding, as set forth in the table below:
91
(Dollars in thousands)
Total deposits
Brokered Deposits (1)
Brokered deposits as a percentage of
total deposits (1)
December 31,
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
$ 45,397,170
$ 42,902,544
$ 42,095,585
$ 37,092,651
$ 30,107,138
4,216,718
3,174,093
1,591,083
1,843,227
1,011,404
9.3 %
7.4 %
3.8 %
5.0 %
3.4 %
(1) Brokered Deposits include certificates of deposit obtained through deposit brokers, deposits received through the
Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Program, as well as wealth management deposits of brokerage customers from
unaffiliated companies which have been placed into deposit accounts of the banks and mature within less than one year.
The Company’s banks routinely accept deposits from a variety of municipal entities. Typically, these municipal entities require
that banks pledge marketable securities to collateralize these public deposits. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the banks had
approximately $6.9 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, of securities collateralizing public deposits and other liquidity sources.
Public deposits requiring pledged assets are not considered to be core deposits, however they provide the Company with a
reliable, lower cost, short-term funding source than what is available through many other wholesale alternatives.
Other than as discussed in this section, the Company is not aware of any known trends, commitments, events, regulatory
recommendations or uncertainties that would have any material adverse effect on the Company’s capital resources, operations
or liquidity.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Company has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments, that may require future
cash payments.
Contractual Obligations. Our significant contractual obligations with third parties primarily consist of deposit liabilities and
other sources of funding for our businesses, including FHLB advances, subordinated debt, other debt borrowings and junior
subordinated debentures. These debt obligations have fixed and determinable contractual repayment dates specific to each type
of instrument. Deposit liabilities are primarily due on-demand, with certain time deposits due based on contractual maturities
that may exceed one year. Repayment of debt obligations, including junior subordinated debentures, vary based on terms of the
underlying debt instrument, with certain debt instruments requiring full repayment of the debt at the respective maturity date
and other debt instruments requiring periodic partial repayment over the entire term of the debt instrument. Further information
on these debt obligations is included in Notes (10) “Deposits” through (14) “Junior Subordinated Debentures” of the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
The Company enters into various leasing arrangements with contractual obligations to pay for use of specified assets over a
specific period of time. These leased assets primarily related to certain banking facilities as well as specific signage related to
sponsorships and other agreements, and certain automatic teller machines and other equipment. Payments under these
obligations are primarily made on a monthly basis. Further information on these lease obligations is included in Note (16)
“Lease Commitments” of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
The Company’s other purchase obligations relate to certain contractual cash obligations for acquisition-related contingent costs,
marketing obligations and services related to the construction of facilities, data processing and the outsourcing of certain
operational activities. In 2023, the Company continued to significantly invest in technology, including enhancements to our
customer’s digital experience, and it is subject to additional contractual purchase obligations in furtherance of these efforts.
The Company also enters into derivative contracts under which the Company is required to either receive cash from or pay cash
to counterparties depending on changes in interest rates. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value representing the net
present value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market rates as of the balance sheet date. Further
information on derivative contracts is included in Note (21) “Derivative Financial Instruments” of the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this report.
Commitments. The following table presents a summary of the amounts and expected maturities of significant commitments as
of December 31, 2023. Further information on these commitments is included in Note (20) “Commitments and Contingencies”
of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
92
(In thousands)
Commitment type:
Commercial, commercial real estate and
construction
Residential real estate
Revolving home equity lines of credit
Letters of credit
Commitments to sell mortgage loans
One year or
less
From one to
three years
From three
to five years
Over
five years
Total
$ 4,788,503 $ 4,105,998 $ 1,107,542 $
222,837
845,628
273,667
626,859
—
—
55,990
—
—
—
59,564
—
491,947 $ 10,493,990
222,837
845,628
389,536
—
—
315
—
626,859
Our remaining commitment to fund community investments totaled $54.0 million, which includes future cash outlays for the
construction and development of properties for low-income housing, support for small businesses, and historic tax credit
projects that qualify for CRA purposes. These commitments are not included in the commitments table above, as the timing and
amounts are based upon the financing arrangements provided in each project’s partnership or operating agreement and could
change due to variances in the construction schedule, project revisions, or the cancellation of the project.
Contingencies. The Company enters into residential mortgage loan sale agreements with investors in the normal course of
business. These agreements usually require certain representations concerning credit information, loan documentation,
collateral and insurability. Investors have requested the Company to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to
repurchase loans which the investors believe do not comply with applicable representations. Upon completion of its own
investigation, the Company generally repurchases or provides indemnification on certain loans. Indemnification requests are
generally received within two years subsequent to sale. Management maintains a liability for estimated losses on loans expected
to be repurchased or on which indemnification is expected to be provided and regularly evaluates the adequacy of this recourse
liability based on trends in repurchase and indemnification requests, actual loss experience, known and inherent risks in the
loans and current economic conditions. At December 31, 2023, the liability for estimated losses on repurchase and
indemnification was approximately $152,000 and was included in other liabilities on the balance sheet.
Forward Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking information
can be identified through the use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,”
“contemplate,” “possible,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements and information are not
historical facts, are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only management’s expectations, estimates and
projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain
risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the
safe harbor provisions for forward- looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is
including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be
deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to the Company’s future financial performance, the performance of
its loan portfolio, the expected amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory
developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, plans to form additional de novo banks or branch
offices, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations from expected developments or events, the Company’s business and
growth strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management businesses, internal growth
and plans to form additional de novo banks or branch offices. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the
forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors and uncertainties, including those discussed in the Risk Factors and
summary thereof disclosed under Item 1A of this Annual Report on 10-K and in any of the Company’s subsequent SEC filings.
Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to any forward-looking statements. The reader is
cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company. Any such statement speaks
only as of the date the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement. The Company
undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events after the date
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Persons are advised, however, to consult further disclosures management makes on
related subjects in its reports filed with the SEC and in its press releases.
93
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
Effects of Inflation
A banking organization’s assets and liabilities are primarily monetary. Changes in the rate of inflation do not have as great an
impact on the financial condition of a bank as do changes in interest rates. Moreover, interest rates do not necessarily change at
the same percentage as inflation. Accordingly, changes in inflation are not expected to have a material impact on the Company.
Asset-Liability Management
As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates
on net interest income. This effort entails providing a reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and
maintenance of yield. Asset-liability management policies are established and monitored by management in conjunction with
the boards of directors of the banks, subject to general oversight by the Risk Management Committee of the Company’s Board.
The policies establish guidelines for acceptable limits on the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes
in interest rates.
Interest rate risk arises when the maturity or re-pricing periods and interest rate indices of the interest-earning assets, interest-
bearing liabilities, and derivative financial instruments are different. It is the risk that changes in the level of market interest
rates will result in disproportionate changes in the value of, and the net earnings generated from, the Company’s interest-
earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments. The Company continuously monitors not only
the organization’s current net interest margin, but also the historical trends of these margins. In addition, management attempts
to identify potential adverse changes in net interest income in future years as a result interest rate fluctuations by performing
simulation analysis of various interest rate environments. If a potential adverse change in net interest margin and/or net income
is identified, management takes appropriate action with its asset-liability structure to mitigate these potentially adverse
situations. Please refer to Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
for further discussion of the net interest margin.
Since the Company’s primary source of interest-bearing liabilities is from customer deposits, the Company’s ability to manage
the types and terms of such deposits is somewhat limited by customer preferences and local competition in the market areas in
which the banks operate. The rates, terms and interest rate indices of the Company’s interest earning assets result primarily
from the Company’s strategy of investing in loans and securities that permit the Company to limit its exposure to interest rate
risk, together with credit risk, while at the same time achieving an acceptable interest rate spread.
The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a regular basis by management and the Risk Management
Committees of the boards of directors of the banks and the Company. The objective of the review is to measure the effect on net
income and to adjust balance sheet and derivative financial instruments to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time
maximize net interest income. While the Company does not believe rapid rate cuts are warranted at this point, we are assuming
that there will be three 25 basis point rate cuts starting June 2024. With that assumption our net interest margin should be
reasonably stable in a narrow range around the current level for the near term.
The following interest rate scenarios display the percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time horizon
assuming increases and decreases of 100 and 200 basis points. The Static Shock Scenario results incorporate actual cash flows
and repricing characteristics for balance sheet instruments following an instantaneous, parallel change in market rates based
upon a static (i.e. no growth or constant) balance sheet. Conversely, the Ramp Scenario results incorporate management’s
projections of future volume and pricing of each of the product lines following a gradual, parallel change in market rates over
twelve months. Actual results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate
changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies. The interest rate sensitivity for both the Static
Shock and Ramp Scenarios at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 is as follows:
94
Static Shock Scenarios
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
Ramp Scenarios
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
+200
Basis
Points
+100
Basis
Points
-100
Basis
Points
-200
Basis
Points
2.6 %
7.2
1.8 %
3.8
0.4 %
(5.0)
(0.7) %
(12.1)
+200
Basis
Points
+100
Basis
Points
-100
Basis
Points
-200
Basis
Points
1.6 %
5.6
1.2 %
3.0
(0.3) %
(2.9)
(1.5) %
(6.8)
One method utilized by financial institutions, including the Company, to manage interest rate risk is to enter into derivative
financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments include interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, floors and collars, futures,
forwards, option contracts and other financial instruments with similar characteristics. Additionally, the Company enters into
commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward
commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors. See Note (21) “Derivative Financial
Instruments” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on
the Company’s derivative financial instruments.
During 2023 and 2022, the Company entered into certain covered call option transactions related to certain securities held by
the Company. The Company uses these option transactions (rather than entering into other derivative interest rate contracts,
such as interest rate floors) to economically hedge positions and compensate for net interest margin compression by increasing
the total return associated with the related securities through fees generated from these options. Although the revenue received
from these options is recorded as non-interest income rather than interest income, the increased return attributable to the related
securities from these options contributes to the Company’s overall profitability. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk
may be impacted by these transactions. To further mitigate this risk, the Company may acquire fixed rate term debt or use
financial derivative instruments. There were no covered call options outstanding as of December 31, 2023 or 2022.
95
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Wintrust Financial Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Wintrust Financial Corporation and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the
related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(2013 framework), and our report dated February 28, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to
error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
96
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that
was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that
are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The
communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken
as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit
matter or on the account or disclosure to which it relates.
Description of the
Matter
Allowance for credit losses
At December 31, 2023, the Company’s allowance for credit losses (ACL) was $427.6 million.
As more fully described in Notes (1) and (5) to the consolidated financial statements, the ACL
represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the contractual term of the loan.
The ACL is measured on a collective or pooled basis when assets share the same risk
characteristics or on an individual basis when assets do not share similar risk characteristics. For
assets measured on a collective basis, the Company applies modeling methodologies that utilize
the Company’s historical loss experience to estimate lifetime credit loss rates on each pool,
including methodologies estimating the probability of default and loss given default on specific
segments. The historical credit loss experience utilized in the ACL models is adjusted for the
Company’s reasonable and supportable economic forecasts. The modeled results are then
adjusted for certain qualitative factors. For assets measured on an individual basis, the Company
measures the expected losses primarily based on the estimated collateral value.
Auditing management’s estimate of the ACL was especially challenging due to the complexity
of the Company’s ACL models, the significant judgment required in establishing management’s
reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, and the significant judgment required in
developing and applying management’s qualitative factors.
How we Addressed
the Matter in Our
Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of
internal controls over the ACL process, including, among other things, controls over
management’s process for the development, operation and monitoring of the ACL models,
assessing and challenging the reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, the development
and application of qualitative factors, and verifying the completeness and accuracy of key inputs
and assumptions used in the ACL models.
To test the Company’s ACL models, we involved our specialists to test a sample of the ACL
models by evaluating model methodology, model performance and testing key modeling
assumptions. Additionally, we tested the accuracy of data utilized in the models by agreeing key
data fields to source documentation and performed targeted re-calculations for a sample of
models.
To test the reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, our audit procedures included among
others, evaluating the basis of the economic forecast factors utilized by management and testing
the completeness and accuracy of data used by management to develop the economic forecasts.
To test the qualitative factors, among other procedures, we assessed management’s methodology
and considered whether relevant risks were reflected in the models and whether qualitative
adjustments to the model outputs were appropriate. We tested the completeness, accuracy and
relevance of the underlying data used to estimate the qualitative factors. We evaluated whether
qualitative factors were reasonable based on changes in economic conditions and the
composition of the loan portfolio.
In addition, we evaluated the overall ACL and whether the ACL appropriately reflects expected
lifetime losses in the loan portfolio as of the consolidated balance sheet date. For example, we
compared the overall ACL amount to those established by similar banking institutions with
similar loan portfolios.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1999.
Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2024
97
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(In thousands, except per share data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value
Held-to-maturity securities, at amortized cost, net of allowance for credit losses of $347 and $488 at
December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively ($3.2 billion and $2.9 billion fair value at
December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively)
Trading account securities
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock
Brokerage customer receivables
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value
Loans, net of unearned income
Allowance for loan losses
Net loans
Premises, software and equipment, net
Lease investments, net
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
Trade date securities receivable
Goodwill
Other acquisition-related intangible assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
Other borrowings
Subordinated notes
Junior subordinated debentures
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized:
Series D - $25 liquidation value; 5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023 and
December 31, 2022
Series E - $25,000 liquidation value; 11,500 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023 and
December 31, 2022
Common stock, no par value; $1.00 stated value; 100,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2023 and
December 31, 2022; 61,268,566 shares issued at December 31, 2023 and 60,797,270 shares issued at
December 31, 2022
Surplus
Treasury stock, at cost, 24,940 shares at December 31, 2023 and 3,262 shares at December 31, 2022
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total shareholders’ equity
December 31,
2023
2022
$
423,404 $
60
2,084,323
3,502,915
3,856,916
4,707
139,268
205,003
10,592
292,722
42,131,831
(344,235)
41,787,596
748,966
281,280
1,551,899
690,722
656,672
22,889
490,908
58
1,988,719
3,243,017
3,640,567
1,127
110,365
224,759
16,387
299,935
39,196,485
(270,173)
38,926,312
764,798
253,928
1,391,342
921,717
653,524
22,186
$
56,259,934 $
52,949,649
$
10,420,401 $
34,976,769
45,397,170
2,326,071
645,813
437,866
253,566
1,799,922
50,860,408
125,000
287,500
61,269
1,943,806
(2,217)
3,345,399
(361,231)
5,399,526
12,668,160
30,234,384
42,902,544
2,316,071
596,614
437,392
253,566
1,646,624
48,152,811
125,000
287,500
60,797
1,902,474
(304)
2,849,007
(427,636)
4,796,838
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
56,259,934 $
52,949,649
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
98
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
Investment securities
Trading account securities
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock
Brokerage customer receivables
Total interest income
Interest expense
Interest on deposits
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances
Interest on other borrowings
Interest on subordinated notes
Interest on junior subordinated debentures
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for credit losses
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
Non-interest income
Wealth management
Mortgage banking
Service charges on deposit accounts
Gains (losses) on investment securities, net
Fees from covered call options
Trading gains, net
Operating lease income, net
Other
Total non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
Software and equipment
Operating lease equipment
Occupancy, net
Data processing
Advertising and marketing
Professional fees
Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets
FDIC insurance
OREO expense, net
Other
Total non-interest expense
Income before taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
Preferred stock dividends
Net income applicable to common shares
Net income per common share—Basic
Net income per common share—Diluted
Cash dividends declared per common share
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Dilutive potential common shares
Average common shares and dilutive common shares
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
99
$
$
$
$
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
2,540,952 $
16,791
78,978
1,806
238,587
41
14,912
1,047
2,893,114
906,470
72,286
35,280
22,024
19,190
1,055,250
1,837,864
114,390
1,723,474
130,607
83,073
55,250
1,525
21,863
1,142
53,298
87,348
434,106
748,013
104,632
42,363
77,068
38,800
65,075
34,758
5,498
71,102
(1,528)
126,718
1,312,499
845,081
222,455
622,626 $
27,964
594,662 $
9.72 $
9.58 $
1.60 $
61,149
938
62,087
1,507,726 $
21,195
43,447
4,903
160,600
22
8,622
928
1,747,443
175,202
30,329
14,294
22,004
10,252
252,081
1,495,362
78,589
1,416,773
126,614
155,173
58,574
(20,427)
14,133
3,752
55,510
67,724
461,053
696,107
95,885
38,008
70,965
31,209
59,418
33,088
6,116
28,639
(140)
117,976
1,177,271
700,555
190,873
509,682 $
27,964
481,718 $
8.14 $
8.02 $
1.36 $
59,205
886
60,091
1,133,528
32,169
6,606
173
95,286
10
7,067
645
1,275,484
88,119
19,581
9,928
21,983
10,916
150,527
1,124,957
(59,263)
1,184,220
124,019
273,010
54,168
(1,059)
3,673
245
53,691
78,373
586,120
691,669
87,515
40,880
74,184
27,279
47,275
29,494
7,734
27,030
(1,654)
101,138
1,132,544
637,796
171,645
466,151
27,964
438,187
7.69
7.58
1.24
56,994
792
57,786
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Net income
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
Before tax
Tax effect
Net of tax
Reclassification of net gains on available-for-sale securities included
in net income
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
622,626 $
509,682 $
466,151
50,669
(14,455)
36,214
(537,602)
143,270
(394,332)
(83,199)
22,152
(61,047)
439
(118)
321
1,079
(290)
789
951
(252)
699
212
(57)
155
35,360
33,512
(8,844)
24,668
175
(47)
128
(394,781)
(26,882)
7,152
(19,730)
241
(64)
177
(62,013)
68,441
(18,240)
50,201
620
(98)
522
(11,290)
454,861
7,788
(1,411)
6,377
66,405
689,031 $
(21,781)
4,564
(17,217)
(431,728)
77,954 $
$
Before tax
Tax effect
Net of tax
Reclassification of amortization of unrealized gains on investment
securities transferred to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale
Before tax
Tax effect
Net of tax
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments
Before tax
Tax effect
Net unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Before tax
Tax effect
Net foreign currency translation adjustment
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
100
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except per share data)
Balance at December 31, 2020
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Cash dividends declared on common
stock, $1.24 per share
Dividends on Series D preferred stock,
$1.64 per share and Series E preferred
stock, $1,718.76 per share
Common stock repurchased under
authorized program
Stock-based compensation
Common stock issued for:
Exercise of stock options and
warrants
Restricted stock awards
Employee stock purchase plan
Director compensation plan
Balance at December 31, 2021
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Cash dividends declared on common
stock, $1.36 per share
Dividends on Series D preferred stock,
$1.64 per share and Series E preferred
stock, $1,718.76 per share
Stock-based compensation
Common stock issued for:
New issuances, net of cost
Exercise of stock options and
warrants
Restricted stock awards
Employee stock purchase plan
Director compensation plan
Balance at December 31, 2022
Cumulative effect adjustment from
the adoption of ASU 2022-02 (TDR),
net of tax
Net income
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax
Cash dividends declared on common
stock, $1.60 per share
Dividends on Series D preferred stock,
$1.64 per share and Series E preferred
stock, $1,718.76 per share
Stock-based compensation
Common stock issued for:
Exercise of stock options and
warrants
Restricted stock awards
Employee stock purchase plan
Director compensation plan
Balance at December 31, 2023
Preferred
stock
Common
stock
Surplus
Treasury
stock
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
Total
shareholders’
equity
$
412,500 $
58,473 $ 1,649,990 $
(100,363) $ 2,080,013 $
15,382 $
4,115,995
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
412,500 $
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
327
20
48
24
—
—
—
—
—
16,177
13,708
(20)
3,277
2,440
—
—
—
—
(9,540)
—
—
—
—
—
466,151
(70,663)
(27,966)
—
—
—
—
—
—
58,892 $ 1,685,572 $
(109,903) $ 2,447,535 $
—
(11,290)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
466,151
(11,290)
(70,663)
(27,966)
(9,540)
16,177
14,035
—
3,325
—
4,092 $
2,464
4,498,688
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31,748
—
—
—
—
—
1,612
174,214
109,903
123
69
42
59
5,067
(69)
3,344
2,598
(304)
—
—
—
509,682
—
—
(431,728)
(80,246)
(27,964)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
509,682
(431,728)
(80,246)
(27,964)
31,748
285,729
4,886
—
3,386
2,657
$
412,500 $
60,797 $ 1,902,474 $
(304) $ 2,849,007 $
(427,636) $
4,796,838
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
56
307
46
63
—
—
—
—
—
33,495
2,186
(307)
3,283
2,675
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,913)
—
—
(544)
622,626
—
—
(544)
622,626
—
66,405
66,405
(97,726)
(27,964)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(97,726)
(27,964)
33,495
2,242
(1,913)
3,329
2,738
$
412,500 $
61,269 $ 1,943,806 $
(2,217) $ 3,345,399 $
(361,231) $
5,399,526
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
101
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Provision for credit losses
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Stock-based compensation expense
Amortization of premium on securities, net
Accretion of discount and deferred fees on loans, net
Mortgage servicing rights fair value changes
Non-designated derivatives fair value changes, net
Originations and purchases of mortgage loans held-for-sale
Early buy-out exercises of mortgage loans held-for-sale guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, net of subsequent paydowns or payoffs
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) (gains) losses
Increase in trading securities, net
Decrease (increase) in brokerage customer receivables, net
Gains on mortgage loans sold
Gains on premium financing receivables sold
(Gains) losses on investment securities, net, and dividend reinvestment on equity securities
Losses (gains) on sales of premises and equipment, net, and sale of related deposit liabilities
Gains on sales and fair value adjustments of other real estate owned, net
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities, net
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Investing Activities:
Proceeds from payments, maturities, calls and sales of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from payments, maturities and calls of held-to-maturity securities
Proceeds from sales of equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Proceeds from sales and capital distributions of equity securities without readily determinable fair value
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities
Purchases of equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Purchases of equity securities without readily determinable fair value
Redemptions (purchases) of FHLB and FRB stock, net
Distributions from (contributions to) investments in partnerships, net
Net cash paid in business combinations
Proceeds from sales of premium financing receivables, net
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
Decrease (increase) in securities purchased under resale agreements with terms exceeding three months, net
(Increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits with banks, net
Increase in loans, net
Redemption of BOLI
Purchases of premises and equipment, net
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities
Financing Activities:
Increase in deposit accounts, net
Increase (decrease) in other borrowings, net
Increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net
Cash payments to settle contingent consideration liabilities recognized in business combinations
Proceeds from common stock offering, net
Issuance of common shares resulting from exercise of stock options, employee stock purchase plan and director compensation plan
Common stock repurchases under authorized program
Common stock repurchases for tax withholdings related to stock-based compensation
Dividends paid
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
Income taxes, net
Business combinations:
Fair value of assets acquired, including cash and cash equivalents
Value ascribed to goodwill and other intangible assets
Fair value of liabilities assumed
Non-cash activities
Transfer to other real estate owned from loans
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2023
2021
$
622,626
$
509,682
$
466,151
114,390
84,764
(19,707)
33,495
1,236
(16,943)
36,209
(3,048)
(1,962,205)
(25,954)
1,963,214
(4,575)
(3,580)
5,795
(37,738)
(890)
(1,525)
1,290
(1,656)
(205,428)
164,606
744,376
2,266,179
191,421
23,592
67
(2,244,564)
(408,917)
(47,454)
(10,450)
19,756
7,476
(5,147)
405,560
5,051
—
(91,251)
(3,303,303)
574
(46,406)
(3,237,816)
2,494,619
40,670
10,000
(57)
—
8,309
—
(1,913)
(125,690)
2,425,938
(67,502)
490,966
423,464
1,026,311
231,653
23,669
8,822
12,468
78,589
82,070
22,057
31,748
2,416
(19,565)
(36,609)
1,691
(2,799,000)
80,158
3,146,442
806
(66)
9,681
(43,391)
—
20,427
2,845
(792)
(91,585)
377,396
1,375,000
386,259
210,958
31,753
1,330
(2,762,171)
(910,964)
(59,495)
(17,429)
(89,381)
4,765
—
—
3,954
700,000
3,382,366
(4,320,225)
960
(53,449)
(3,490,769)
806,947
125,135
1,075,000
—
285,729
11,233
—
(304)
(108,210)
2,195,530
79,761
411,205
490,966
239,209
153,499
—
—
—
(59,263)
101,797
(2,861)
16,177
6,391
(83,434)
16,515
(569)
(6,803,777)
88
7,441,705
(5,812)
(390)
(8,632)
(214,085)
—
1,059
(3,614)
(2,792)
187,743
78,475
1,130,872
1,482,353
307,971
9,759
2,685
(842,170)
(2,873,691)
(9,060)
(9,265)
210
(2,107)
(585,402)
—
16,927
(700,000)
(569,205)
(2,101,121)
332
(57,075)
(5,928,859)
5,006,801
(27,784)
12,629
(16,583)
—
19,824
(9,540)
—
(98,629)
4,886,718
88,731
322,474
411,205
156,868
178,575
591,409
9,275
6,007
$
$
$
$
8,564
10,018
5,837
$
$
102
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of Wintrust Financial Corporation (“Wintrust” or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries
conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and prevailing practices of the banking industry. In the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts contained in the consolidated financial statements. Management believes that the estimates made
are reasonable; however, changes in estimates may be required if economic or other conditions change beyond management’s
expectations. Reclassifications of certain prior year amounts have been made to conform to the current year presentation. The
following is a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Wintrust include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance
of common stock that then share in the earnings of the Company. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
is increased by the assumed conversion of any outstanding convertible preferred stock shares from the beginning of the year or
date of issuance, if later, and the number of common shares that would be issued assuming the exercise of stock options and the
issuance of restricted shares using the treasury stock method. The adjustments to the weighted-average common shares
outstanding are only made when such adjustments will dilute earnings per common share. If relevant convertible preferred
shares are outstanding during a period, net income applicable to common shares used in the diluted earnings per share
calculation may be adjusted to consider potential conversion of such preferred shares. Where the effect of this conversion
would reduce the loss per share or increase the income per share, net income applicable to common shares is not adjusted by the
associated preferred dividends.
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805,
“Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”) when it obtains control of a business. When determining whether a business has been
acquired, the Company first evaluates whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired are concentrated in
a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If concentrated in such a manner, the set of assets and
activities is not a business. If not concentrated in such a manner, the Company assesses whether the set meets the definition of a
business by containing inputs, outputs and at least one substantive process. If the set represents a business, the Company
recognizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, immediately expenses transaction costs and accounts for
restructuring plans separately from the business combination. The excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the
net tangible and intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Alternatively, a gain is recorded equal to the amount by
which the fair value of assets purchased exceeds the fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration paid.
If the set of assets and activities do not constitute a business, the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition. The cost of
a group of assets acquired is allocated to the individual assets acquired or liabilities assumed based on the relative fair value and
does not result in the recognition of goodwill. Generally, any excess of the cost of the transaction over the fair value of the
individual assets acquired or liabilities assumed, or, in contrast, any excess of the fair value of the individual assets acquired or
liabilities assumed over the cost of the transaction, should be allocated on a relative fair value basis. Certain "non-qualifying"
assets are excluded from this allocation, and are recognized at the individual asset's fair value.
Results of operations of the acquired business are included in the income statement from the effective date of acquisition.
Subsequent adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified in reporting periods within one year after the acquisition date
in a business combination are recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined.
103
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, Wintrust considers cash on hand, cash items in the process of
collection, non-interest bearing amounts due from correspondent banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements with original maturities of three months or less, to be cash equivalents. There were no securities sold under
agreements to repurchase with original maturities exceeding three months at December 31, 2023.
Investment Securities
The Company classifies debt and equity securities upon purchase in one of five categories: trading, held-to-maturity debt
securities, available-for-sale debt securities, equity securities with a readily determinable fair value or equity securities without
a readily determinable fair value. Debt and equity securities held for resale are classified as trading securities. Debt securities
for which the Company has the ability and positive intent to hold until maturity are classified as held-to-maturity. All other debt
securities are classified as available-for-sale as they may be sold prior to maturity in response to changes in the Company’s
interest rate risk profile, funding needs, demand for collateralized deposits by public entities or other reasons. Equity securities
are classified based upon whether a readily determinable fair value exists on such security. The fair value of an equity security
is readily determinable if it meets certain conditions, including whether sales prices or bid-ask quotes are currently available on
certain securities exchanges; traded only in a foreign market that is of a breadth and scope comparable to one of the U.S.
markets; or the security is an investment in a mutual fund or similar structure with a fair value per share or unit that is
determined and published, and is the basis for current transactions.
Held-to-maturity debt securities are stated at amortized cost, which represents actual cost adjusted for premium amortization
and discount accretion using methods that approximate the effective interest method. Available-for-sale debt securities are
stated at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of related taxes, included in shareholders’ equity as a separate
component of other comprehensive income. Trading account securities and equity securities with a readily determinable fair
value are stated at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains and losses from sales and fair value adjustments are included in
other non-interest income. Equity securities without a readily determinable fair value are stated at either a calculated net asset
value per share, if available, or the cost of the security minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from
observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar instrument of the same issuer.
Subsequent to classification at the time of purchase, the Company may transfer debt securities between trading, held-to-
maturity, or available-for-sale. For debt securities transferred to trading, the current unrealized gain or loss at the date of
transfer, net of related taxes, is immediately recognized in earnings. Debt securities transferred from trading to either held-to-
maturity or available-for-sale have already recognized any unrealized gain or loss into earnings and this amount is not reversed.
Unrealized gains or losses, net related taxes, for available-for-sale debt securities transferred to held-to-maturity remain as a
separate component of other comprehensive income and an offsetting discount or premium is included in the amortized cost of
the held-to-maturity debt security. These amounts are amortized over the remaining life of the debt security in equal and
offsetting amounts. Unrealized gains or losses for held-to-maturity debt securities transferred to available-for-sale are
recognized at the transfer date as a separate component of other comprehensive income, net of related taxes.
Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt investment securities (with certain exceptions for debt
securities noted below) that are deemed to be credit losses are charged to the allowance for credit losses. In evaluating credit
impairment, management considers the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-
term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value in the near term. Declines in the fair value of debt securities below
amortized cost are deemed to be credit losses in circumstances where: (1) the Company has the intent to sell a security; (2) it is
more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or
(3) the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security. If the Company intends to sell a
debt security or if it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before recovery, a credit
impairment write-down is recognized in the allowance for credit losses equal to the difference between the debt security’s
amortized cost basis and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the debt security or it is not more likely than not that it
will be required to sell the debt security before recovery, the credit impairment write-down is separated into an amount
representing credit loss, which is recognized in the allowance for credit losses, and an amount related to all other factors, which
is recognized in other comprehensive income.
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income. Equity
securities without readily determinable fair values are measured at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes
resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer. Such
104
investments are included within accrued interest receivable and other assets within the Company's Consolidated Statements of
Condition.
Interest and dividends, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, are recognized as interest income when
earned. Realized gains and losses on sales (using the specific identification method), unrealized gains and losses on equity
securities and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in non-interest income.
FHLB and FRB Stock
Investments in FHLB and FRB stock are restricted as to redemption and are carried at cost.
Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements and Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
Securities purchased under resale agreements and securities sold under repurchase agreements are generally treated as
collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the amount at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued
interest. Securities, consisting of U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government agency and mortgage-backed securities, pledged as collateral
under these financing arrangements cannot be sold by the secured party. The fair value of collateral either received from or
provided to a third party is monitored and additional collateral is obtained or requested to be returned as deemed appropriate.
Brokerage Customer Receivables
The Company, under an agreement with an out-sourced securities clearing firm, extends credit to its brokerage customers to
finance their purchases of securities on margin. The Company receives income from interest charged on such extensions of
credit. Brokerage customer receivables represent amounts due on margin balances. Securities owned by customers are held as
collateral for these receivables.
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale
Mortgage loans are classified as held-for-sale when originated or acquired with the intent to sell the loan into the secondary
market. ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” provides entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at
fair value. Mortgage loans classified as held-for-sale are measured at fair value which is typically determined by reference to
investor prices for loan products with similar characteristics. Changes in fair value are recognized in mortgage banking revenue.
Market conditions or other developments may change management’s intent with respect to the disposition of these loans and
loans previously classified as mortgage loans held-for-sale may be reclassified to the loans held-for-investment portfolio, with
the balance transferred continuing to be carried at fair value.
Loans and Leases
Loans are generally reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income. Interest income is recognized when
earned. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred and amortized over the expected life of the loan as
an adjustment to the yield using methods that approximate the effective interest method. Finance charges on premium finance
receivables are earned over the term of the loan, using a method which approximates the effective yield method.
Leases classified as direct financing leases are included within lease loans, net of unearned income, for financial statement
purposes. Direct financing leases are stated as the sum of remaining minimum lease payments from lessees plus estimated
residual values less unearned lease income. Unearned lease income on direct financing leases is recognized over the term of the
leases using the effective interest method.
Interest income is not accrued on loans where management has determined that the borrowers may be unable to meet
contractual principal or interest obligations, or where interest or principal is 90 days or more past due, unless the loans are
adequately secured and in the process of collection. Cash receipts on non-accrual loans are generally applied to the principal
balance until the remaining balance is considered collectible, at which time interest income may be recognized when received.
Allowance for Credit Losses
In accordance with ASC 326, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses” (“ASC 326”), the Company measures the allowance for
credit losses at the time of origination or purchase of a financial asset, representing an estimate of lifetime expected credit losses
on the related asset. Financial assets include assets measured under the amortized cost basis, including loans, net investments in
105
leases recognized by a lessor, held-to-maturity debt securities and purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) assets at the time of
and subsequent to acquisition, and off-balance-sheet credit exposures considered not unconditionally cancellable. In addition to
financial assets measured at amortized cost, credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities are recorded through the
allowance for credit losses and not as a direct adjustment to the amortized cost of the securities. The Company elects the
collateral maintenance practical expedient under ASC 326 and applies this approach to securities purchased under resale
agreements and brokerage customer receivables. In accordance with contractual terms, these assets require underlying collateral
to be monitored continuously and replenished when collateral is less than required levels. The Company measures an allowance
for credit losses if the carrying balance of such assets exceeds the amount of underlying collateral.
The allowance for credit losses on financial assets held at amortized cost is measured on a collective or pooled basis when
similar risk characteristics exist. The Company utilizes modeling methodologies that estimate lifetime credit loss rates on each
pool, including methodologies estimating the probability of default and loss given default on specific segments. Credit quality
indicators, specifically the Company's internal risk rating systems, reflect how the Company monitors credit losses and
represent factors used by the Company when measuring the allowance for credit losses. Historical credit loss history is adjusted
for reasonable and supportable forecasts developed by the Company and incorporates third party economic forecasts on a
quantitative or qualitative basis. Reasonable and supportable forecasts consider the macroeconomic factors that are most
relevant to evaluating and predicting expected credit losses in the Company's financial assets. For periods beyond the ability to
develop reasonable and supportable forecasts, the Company reverts to historical loss rates. Qualitative factors assessed by
Management include the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Changes in the nature and volume of the institution’s financial assets;
Changes in the existence, growth, and effect of any concentrations of credit;
Changes in the volume and severity of past due financial assets, the volume of non-accrual assets, and the volume and
severity of adversely classified or graded assets;
Changes in the value of the underlying collateral for loans that are not collateral-dependent;
Changes in the institution’s lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and practices
for collections, write-offs, and recoveries;
Changes in the quality of the institution’s credit review function;
Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of the institution’s lending, investment, collection, and other relevant
management and staff;
The effect of changes in other external factors such as the regulatory, legal and technological environments;
competition; and events such as natural disasters; and
Actual and expected changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and
developments in which the institution operates that affect the collectability of financial assets.
Expected credit losses are measured over the contractual term of the financial asset with consideration of expected
prepayments. Expected extensions, renewals or modifications of the financial asset are considered when the expected extension,
renewal or modification is contained within the existing agreement and is not unconditionally cancellable.
Financial assets that do not share similar risk characteristics with any pool are assessed for the allowance for credit losses on an
individual basis. These typically include assets experiencing financial difficulties, including substandard non-accrual assets. If
an individual asset is removed from a pool, the allowance for credit losses for such pool will be measured without considering
the removed asset. If foreclosure is probable or the asset is considered collateral-dependent, expected credit losses are measured
based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral adjusted for selling costs, if appropriate. On January 1, 2023, the
Company adopted ASU 2022-02 using a modified retrospective approach. As a result, financial assets that were restructured
prior to adoption are no longer considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). Prior to the adoption, for certain accruing
current and expected TDRs, expected credit losses were measured based upon the present value of future cash flows of the
modified asset terms compared to the amortized cost of the asset.
For purchased financial assets that have experienced more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination
(“PCD assets”), the Company recognizes the sum of the purchase price and estimate of the allowance for credit losses as of the
date of acquisition as the initial amortized cost basis. If the estimated allowance for credit losses is recognized under a
methodology that is not a discounted cash flow methodology, such allowance for credit losses will be estimated based upon the
unpaid principal balance of the financial asset.
The Company does not measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable balances if these balances are
written off in a timely manner. Write-offs of accrued interest receivable balances are recorded as a reduction to interest income.
Recoveries of financial assets previously written off are recognized when received and recorded as a component of the
allowance for credit losses. When measuring the allowance for credit losses, the Company incorporates an estimate of expected
recoveries provided the estimate is reasonable and supportable. Write-offs of financial assets are charged-off or deducted from
106
the allowance for credit losses and recorded in the period when the Company concludes that all or a portion of a financial asset
is no longer collectible. A provision for credit losses is charged to income based on Management’s periodic evaluation of the
factors previously described. Evaluations are conducted at least quarterly and more frequently if deemed necessary.
Mortgage Servicing Rights ("MSRs")
MSRs are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Condition at fair value in accordance with ASC 860, “Transfers and
Servicing.” The Company originates mortgage loans for sale to the secondary market. Certain loans are originated and sold with
servicing rights retained. MSRs associated with loans originated and sold, where servicing is retained, are capitalized at the time
of sale at fair value based on the future net cash flows expected to be realized for performing the servicing activities, and
included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The change in the fair value of MSRs is recorded as a
component of mortgage banking revenue in non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company
measures the fair value of MSRs by stratifying the servicing rights into pools based on homogeneous characteristics, such as
product type and interest rate. The fair value of each servicing rights pool is calculated based on the present value of estimated
future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risk associated with that pool, given current market conditions.
Estimates of fair value include assumptions about prepayment speeds, interest rates and other factors which are subject to
change over time. Changes in these underlying assumptions could cause the fair value of MSRs to change significantly in the
future.
Lease Investments
The Company’s investments in equipment and other assets held on operating leases are reported as lease investments, net.
Rental income on operating leases is recognized as income over the lease term on a straight-line basis. Equipment and other
assets held on operating leases is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of the cost of the assets held on
operating leases, less any residual value, is computed using the straight-line method over the term of the leases, which is
generally seven years or less.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Useful lives generally range from two to 15 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, two to seven years for software and
computer-related equipment and seven to 39 years for buildings and improvements. Land improvements are amortized over a
period of 15 years and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the improvement or the term
of the respective lease including any lease renewals deemed to be reasonably assured. Land, antique furnishings and artwork are
not subject to depreciation. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs
are charged to expense as incurred. Eligible costs related to the configuration, coding, testing and installation of internal use
software and qualifying cloud computing arrangements are capitalized.
Long-lived depreciable assets are evaluated periodically for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment exists when the expected undiscounted future cash flows of a long-lived
asset are less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying value and the
estimated fair value of the asset based on a quoted market price, if applicable, or a discounted cash flow analysis. Impairment
losses are recognized in other non-interest expense.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate acquired in partial or full satisfaction of loans and is included in other assets
in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Other real estate owned is recorded at its estimated fair value less estimated
selling costs at the date of transfer. Any excess of the related loan balance over the fair value less expected selling costs is
charged to the allowance for credit losses. In contrast, any excess of the fair value less expected selling costs over the related
loan balance is recorded as a recovery of prior charge-offs on the loan and, if any portion of the excess exceeds prior charge-
offs, as an increase to earnings. Subsequent changes in value are reported as adjustments to the carrying amount, limited to the
initial fair value recorded at the date of transfer, and are recorded in other non-interest expense. Gains and losses upon sale, if
any, are also charged to other non-interest expense. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, other real estate owned totaled $13.3
million and $9.9 million, respectively.
107
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired. Other intangible
assets represent purchased assets that also lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of
contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination
with a related contract, asset or liability. In accordance with accounting standards, goodwill is not amortized, but rather is tested
for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently when events warrant, using a qualitative or quantitative approach.
Intangible assets which have finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and also are subject to impairment
testing. Intangible assets which have indefinite lives are evaluated each reporting date to determine whether events and
circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. If an indefinite useful life can no longer be supported for such asset,
the intangible asset will be amortized prospectively over the remaining estimated useful life. If an indefinite useful life can be
supported, the asset is not amortized, but rather is tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently when events
warrant, using a qualitative or quantitative approach. The Company’s intangible assets having finite lives are amortized over
varying periods not exceeding twenty years.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance ("BOLI")
The Company maintains BOLI on certain executives. BOLI balances are recorded at their cash surrender values and are
included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Changes in the cash surrender values are included in non-
interest income. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, BOLI totaled $160.2 million and $157.3 million, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
The Company enters into derivative transactions principally to protect against the risk of adverse price or interest rate
movements on the future cash flows or the value of certain assets and liabilities. The Company is also required to recognize
certain contracts and commitments, including certain commitments to fund mortgage loans held-for-sale, as derivatives when
the characteristics of those contracts and commitments meet the definition of a derivative. The Company accounts for
derivatives in accordance with ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” which requires that all derivative instruments be recorded
in the Consolidated Statements of Condition at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of
hedging relationship.
Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or
liability attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivative instruments
designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted
transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Formal documentation of the relationship between a derivative instrument and a
hedged asset or liability, as well as the risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction and an
assessment of effectiveness, is required at inception to apply hedge accounting. In addition, formal documentation of ongoing
effectiveness testing is required to maintain hedge accounting.
Fair value hedges are accounted for by recording the changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and the changes in
the fair value related to the risk being hedged of the hedged asset or liability on the statement of condition with corresponding
offsets recorded in the income statement. The adjustment to the hedged asset or liability is included in the basis of the hedged
item, while the fair value of the derivative is recorded as a freestanding asset or liability. Actual cash receipts or payments and
related amounts accrued during the period on derivatives included in a fair value hedge relationship are recorded as adjustments
to the interest income or expense recorded on the hedged asset or liability.
Cash flow hedges are accounted for by recording the changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument on the statement of
condition as either a freestanding asset or liability, with a corresponding offset recorded in other comprehensive income within
shareholders’ equity, net of deferred taxes. Amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest
expense in the period or periods the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.
Under both the fair value and cash flow hedge scenarios, changes in the fair value of derivatives not considered to be highly
effective in hedging the change in fair value or the expected cash flows of the hedged item are recognized in earnings as non-
interest income during the period of the change.
Derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges according to accounting guidance are reported on the statement of
condition at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognized in earnings as non-interest income during the period of the
change.
108
Commitments to fund mortgage loans (i.e. interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments
for the future delivery of these mortgage loans are accounted for as derivatives and are not designated in hedging relationships.
Fair values of these mortgage derivatives are estimated primarily based on changes in mortgage rates from the date of the
commitments. Changes in the fair values of these derivatives are included in mortgage banking revenue.
Forward currency and commodity contracts used to manage foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk, respectively,
associated with certain assets are accounted for as derivatives and are not designated in hedging relationships. Such derivatives
are recorded at fair value based on prevailing currency and commodity exchange rates at the measurement date. Changes in the
fair values of these derivatives are recognized in earnings as non-interest income during the period of change.
Periodically, the Company sells options to an unrelated bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain securities held within its
investment portfolios (“covered call options”). These option transactions are designed primarily as an economic hedge to
compensate for net interest margin compression by increasing the total return associated with holding the related securities as
earning assets by using fee income generated from these options. These transactions are not designated in hedging relationships
pursuant to accounting guidance and, accordingly, changes in fair values of these contracts, are reported in other non-interest
income.
The Company periodically purchases options for the right to purchase securities not currently held within its investment
portfolios or enters into interest rate swaps in which the Company elects to not designate such derivatives as hedging
instruments. These option and swap transactions are designed primarily to economically hedge a portion of the fair value
adjustments related to the Company’s mortgage servicing rights portfolio. The gain or loss associated with these derivative
contracts are included in mortgage banking revenue.
Trust Assets, Assets Under Management and Brokerage Assets
Assets held in fiduciary or agency capacity for customers are not included in the consolidated financial statements as they are
not assets of Wintrust or its subsidiaries. Fee income is recognized on an accrual basis and is included as a component of non-
interest income.
Income Taxes
Wintrust and its subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return. Income tax expense is based upon income in the
consolidated financial statements rather than amounts reported on the income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
currently enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected
to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as an income tax
benefit or income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
Positions taken in the Company’s tax returns may be subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. In
accordance with applicable accounting guidance, uncertain tax positions are initially recognized in the financial statements
when it is more likely than not the positions will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are
both initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized
upon settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Interest and penalties on
income tax uncertainties are classified within income tax expense in the income statement.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
In accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” compensation cost is measured as the fair value of the
awards on their date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options and a Monte-Carlo
simulation model is used to estimate the fair value of performance awards with a market condition metric. The market price of
the Company’s stock at the date of grant is used to estimate the fair value of time-vested restricted stock awards and
performance awards with a performance metric. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally
defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period for the entire award.
Accounting guidance permits for the recognition of stock based compensation for the number of awards that are ultimately
expected to vest. As a result, recognized compensation expense for stock options and restricted share awards is reduced for
estimated forfeitures prior to vesting. Forfeitures rates are estimated for each type of award based on historical forfeiture
109
experience. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and
circumstances. The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises and vesting of restricted shares.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes
unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, net of deferred taxes, changes in deferred unrealized gains and
losses on investment securities transferred from available-for-sale debt securities to held-to-maturity debt securities, net of
deferred taxes, adjustments related to cash flow hedges, net of deferred taxes, and foreign currency translation adjustments, net
of deferred taxes. The Company has a policy for releasing the income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive
income using an individual security approach.
Stock Repurchases
The Company periodically repurchases shares of its outstanding common stock through open market purchases or other
methods. Repurchased shares are recorded as treasury shares on the trade date using the treasury stock method, and the cash
paid is recorded as treasury stock.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company revalues assets, liabilities, revenue and expense denominated in non-U.S. currencies into U.S. dollars at the end
of each month using applicable exchange rates.
Gains and losses relating to translating functional currency financial statements for U.S. reporting are included in other
comprehensive income. Gains and losses relating to the re-measurement of transactions to the functional currency are reported
in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Going Concern
In connection with preparing financial statements for each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether conditions or
events, considered in the aggregate, exist that would raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. If substantial doubt exists, specific disclosures are
required to be included in the Company's financial statements issued. Through its evaluation, the Company did not identify any
conditions or events that would raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern within one
year of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Pronouncements and Other Regulatory Rules Newly Adopted
Reference Rate Reform
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), Facilitation of the Effects of
Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting,” which provides temporary optional relief for contracts modified as a result of
reference rate reform meeting certain modification criteria, generally allowing an entity to account for contract modifications
occurring due to reference rate reform as an event that does not require contract remeasurement or reassessment of a previous
accounting determination at the modification date. The guidance also includes temporary optional expedients intended to
provide relief from various hedge effectiveness requirements for hedging relationships affected by reference rate reform,
provided certain criteria are met, and allows a one-time election to sell or transfer to either available-for-sale or trading any
held-to-maturity (“HTM”) debt securities that refer to an interest rate affected by reference rate reform and were classified as
HTM prior to January 1, 2020. Additionally, in January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform
(Topic 848): Scope,” which provided additional clarification that certain optional expedients and exceptions noted above apply
to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for margining, discounting or contract price alignment that is modified as a
result of reference rate reform. This guidance was effective upon issuance and was able to be applied prospectively, with certain
exceptions, through December 31, 2022.
In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-06 “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) - Deferral of the Sunset Date of
Topic 848,” which updated the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024, after which entities
would no longer be permitted to apply the relief in Topic 848. The objective of Topic 848 is to provide relief during the
temporary transition period, thus, the FASB included a sunset provision within Topic 848 based on expectations of when
LIBOR would cease being published. This guidance was effective upon issuance and can be applied prospectively, with certain
110
exceptions, through December 31, 2024. The Company expects that adoption of this standard on activities subsequent to
December 31, 2023 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The amendments in ASU No. 2020-04, ASU No. 2021-01, and ASU No. 2022-06 apply only to contracts, hedging
relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate
expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. Therefore, in accordance with the FASB, as well as federal and state
banking regulators’ “Interagency Policy Statement on Reference Rates for Loans” guidance, the Company has discontinued use
of USD LIBOR in new contracts and continues to monitor efforts and evaluate the impact of reference rate reform on its
consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has mitigated its remaining USD LIBOR exposure,
with any outstanding or committed exposures being proactively moved to an alternative rate or falling back per the terms of the
contract or as per the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act (“AIRLA”).
Business Combinations
In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-08, “Business Combinations (Topic 805), Accounting for Contract Assets
and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers,” which clarifies diversity in practice related to recognition and
measurement of contract assets and liabilities related to revenue contracts with customers which are acquired in a business
combination by aligning business combination accounting with the subsequent accounting for contract assets and liabilities by
requiring entities to apply ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, in order to recognize and measure deferred
revenue in a business combination. The guidance also creates an exception to the general recognition and measurement
principle in ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, under which such amounts are recognized by the acquirer at fair value on
the acquisition date by providing two practical expedients for acquirers. The Company adopted ASU No. 2021-08 as of January
1, 2023. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method
In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-01, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio
Layer Method” which expands the current last-of-layer method by allowing multiple hedged layers to be designated for a single
closed portfolio of financial assets or one or more beneficial interests secured by a portfolio of financial instruments. The
Company adopted ASU No. 2022-01 as of January 1, 2023. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures
In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-02, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt
Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures” which eliminates the separate recognition and measurement guidance for TDRs by
creditors, while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancing and restructurings by creditors when a borrower
is experiencing financial difficulty, and requiring entities to disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for
certain financing receivables and net investments in leases. The Company adopted ASU No. 2022-02 as of January 1, 2023.
Guidance was adopted under a modified retrospective approach and, at January 1, 2023, the Company recognized a cumulative-
effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses of $741,000 representing the change in methodology of estimating expected
credit losses for loans previously classified as TDRs. This amount increased the allowance for loan losses, presented separately
on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition, with an offsetting adjustment recorded directly to retained earnings,
net of taxes.
Legislation Issued Related to Stock Repurchases
On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) was signed by the President of the United States. Among
other things, the IRA imposes a 1% excise tax on the fair market value of stock repurchased after December 31, 2022. With
certain exceptions, the value of stock repurchased is determined net of stock issued in the year, including shares issued pursuant
to compensatory arrangements. This new legislation did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
Cybersecurity Disclosure Enhancements
In July 2023, the SEC issued a final rule on “Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure,”
which provides new enhanced and standardized disclosure requirements for registrants regarding the timing and description of
material cyber incidents. The ruling also expands disclosures by requiring registrants to periodically disclose management’s
role and processes in assessing, identifying, and managing material cybersecurity risks. The Company adopted an updated
111
incident evaluation approach to facilitate the Company’s ability to make a timely materiality determination and disclosure in the
event of a cyber incident. The SEC ruling is applicable to fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2023. The Company
adopted this guidance in conjunction with the issuance of 2023 Form 10-K and adoption did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
(2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurement - Equity Securities with Contractual Sale Restrictions
In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-03, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity
Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions” which clarifies the guidance in ASC 820 when measuring the fair value of
an equity security subject to contractual restrictions that prohibit the sale of an equity security, and also requires specific
disclosures related to these types of securities. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023,
including interim periods therein, and is to be applied under a prospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company
does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Equity Method and Joint Ventures - Investments in Tax Credit Structures
In March 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-02, “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting
for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method,” which allows reporting entities the
option to apply the proportional amortization method to other tax credit programs besides the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
structures. The guidance requires application of the proportional amortization method on a tax-credit-program-by-tax-credit-
program basis rather than electing the method at the reporting level entity level. This guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods therein, and is to be applied under either a modified retrospective
or retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Segment Reporting
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable
Segment Disclosures,” to enhance public entity disclosures regarding significant segment expenses which are regularly reported
to an entity’s chief operating decision-maker (“CODM”) and included in a segment’s reported profit or loss. This ASU requires
disclosure of the amount and composition of “other segment items”, the title and position of the CODM, and how the CODM
uses reported measures of profit or loss to assess segment performance. Further, the guidance requires certain segment
disclosures previously provided only annually, on an interim basis. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The guidance is to be applied
retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on the
consolidated financial statements.
Income Tax Disclosures
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax
Disclosures,” to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. This ASU requires annually that
all entities disclose increasingly disaggregated information on amount of income taxes paid. Further, this ASU requires
annually that all public entities must disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for
reconciling items that meet a specific quantitative threshold. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2024 and is to be applied either on prospective basis or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
112
(3) Investment Securities
A summary of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities portfolios presenting carrying amounts and
gross unrealized gains and losses as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows:
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Other
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial (multi-family)
mortgage-baked securities
Collateralized mortgage
obligations
Total available-for-sale securities
Held-to-maturity securities
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial (multi-family)
mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage
obligations
Corporate notes
Total held-to-maturity securities
Less: Allowance for credit losses
Held-to-maturity securities, net
of allowance for credit losses
Equity securities with readily
determinable fair value
December 31, 2023
Gross
Gross
unrealized
unrealized
losses
gains
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2022
Gross
Gross
unrealized
unrealized
losses
gains
Fair Value
$
6,960 $
8 $
— $
6,968 $
14,943 $
5 $
— $
14,948
50,000
144,299
83,996
1,000
—
657
—
—
(4,876)
(3,998)
45,124
80,000
140,958
173,861
(8,456)
75,540
(9)
991
93,994
1,000
36
230
—
2
(5,814)
74,222
(5,436)
168,655
(9,291)
—
84,703
1,002
3,505,012
1,392
(446,784)
3,059,620
3,308,494
238
(488,795)
2,819,937
13,201
68
(289)
12,980
—
—
—
—
175,346
1,400
(16,012)
160,734
97,342
$ 3,979,814 $ 3,525 $ (480,424) $ 3,502,915 $ 3,769,634 $
(17,792)
79,550
—
511 $ (527,128) $ 3,243,017
$ 336,468 $
— $ (67,058) $ 269,410 $ 339,614 $ — $ (75,293) $ 264,321
172,933
565
(3,778)
169,720
179,027
477
(4,066)
175,438
3,042,828
1,922
(549,265)
2,495,485
2,900,031
—
(583,682)
2,316,349
6,415
—
(184)
6,231
—
241,075
57,544
978
(21,502)
220,551
164,151
7
(3,480)
54,071
58,232
—
—
—
—
—
(23,322)
140,829
(5,348)
52,884
$ 3,857,263 $ 3,472 $ (645,267) $ 3,215,468 $ 3,641,055 $
477 $ (691,711) $ 2,949,821
(347)
$ 3,856,916
(488)
$ 3,640,567
$ 143,312 $ 3,500 $ (7,544) $ 139,268 $ 115,552 $ 2,935 $ (8,122) $ 110,365
(1) None of our mortgage-backed securities are subprime.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values totaled $60.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and $43.8 million as of
December 31, 2022. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are included as part of accrued interest receivable
and other assets in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition. The Company monitors its equity investments
without readily determinable fair values to identify potential transactions that may indicate an observable price change in
orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer, requiring adjustment to its carrying amount. The
Company recorded no upward and no downward adjustments related to such observable price changes in 2023 or 2022. The
Company conducts a quarterly assessment of its equity securities without readily determinable fair values to determine whether
impairment exists in such equity securities, considering, among other factors, the nature of the securities, financial condition of
the issuer and expected future cash flows. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company
recorded $688,000 and $12.2 million, respectively, of impairment of equity securities without readily determinable fair values.
113
The following tables present the portion of the Company’s available-for-sale investment securities portfolios which had gross
unrealized losses, reflecting the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at
December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively:
As of December 31, 2023
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Other
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial (multi-family)
mortgage backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Continuous unrealized
losses existing for less
than 12 months
Continuous unrealized
losses existing for
greater than 12 months
Total
Fair value
Unrealized
losses
Fair value
Unrealized
losses
Fair value
Unrealized
losses
$
— $
36,519
— $
(513)
45,124 $
58,216
(4,876) $
(3,485)
45,124 $
94,735
(4,876)
(3,998)
—
991
—
(9)
75,540
—
(8,456)
—
75,540
991
(8,456)
(9)
333,879
(1,170) 2,374,724
(445,614) 2,708,603
(446,784)
Total available-for-sale securities
$ 381,342 $
9,953
—
(289)
—
(289)
(16,012)
(16,012)
(1,981) $ 2,628,705 $ (478,443) $ 3,010,047 $ (480,424)
9,953
75,101
—
75,101
—
(1) None of our mortgage-backed securities are subprime.
As of December 31, 2022
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes:
Financial issuers
Other
Mortgage-backed: (1)
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total available-for-sale securities
Continuous unrealized
losses existing for less
than 12 months
Continuous unrealized
losses existing for
greater than 12 months
Total
Fair value
Unrealized
losses
Fair value
Unrealized
losses
Fair value
Unrealized
losses
$
36,750 $
88,433
(3,250) $
(1,997)
7,436 $
41,642
(2,564) $
(3,439)
44,186 $
130,075
(5,814)
(5,436)
14,420
—
(580)
—
70,283
—
(8,711)
—
84,703
—
(9,291)
—
1,185,885
2,690
(488,795)
(17,792)
$ 1,328,178 $ (105,511) $ 1,774,421 $ (421,617) $ 3,102,599 $ (527,128)
(389,301) 2,764,085
79,550
(17,602)
(99,494) 1,578,200
76,860
(190)
(1) Consisting entirely of residential mortgage-backed securities, none of which are subprime.
The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment securities to determine whether securities are experiencing credit
losses. Factors for consideration include the nature of the securities, credit ratings or financial condition of the issuer, the extent
of the unrealized loss, expected cash flows, market conditions and the Company’s ability to hold the securities through the
anticipated recovery period.
The Company does not consider available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2023 to be experiencing
credit losses and recognized no resulting allowance for credit losses for such individually assessed credit losses. The Company
does not intend to sell these investments and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these
investments before recovery of the amortized cost bases, which may be the maturity dates of the securities. The unrealized
losses within each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates, market spreads and market conditions
subsequent to purchase. Available-for-sale securities with continuous unrealized losses existing for more than twelve months at
December 31, 2023 were primarily mortgage-backed securities with unrealized losses due to increased market rates during such
period.
See Note (5) “Allowance for Credit Losses” for further discussion regarding any credit losses associated with held-to-maturity
securities at December 31, 2023.
114
The following table provides information as to the amount of gross gains and losses, adjustments and impairment on investment
securities recognized in earnings and proceeds received through the sale or call of investment securities:
(In thousands)
Realized gains on investment securities
Realized losses on investment securities
Net realized gains on investment securities
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
$
1,136 $
(71)
1,065
461 $
(22)
439
1,252
(173)
1,079
2,688
(2,411)
Unrealized gains on equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Unrealized losses on equity securities with readily determinable fair value
5,428
(4,280)
1,154
(9,862)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities with readily
determinable fair value
1,148
(8,708)
277
Upward adjustments of equity securities without readily determinable fair
values
Downward adjustments of equity securities without readily determinable
fair values
Impairment of equity securities without readily determinable fair values
Adjustment and impairment, net, of equity securities without readily
determinable fair values
Gains (losses) on investment securities, net
Proceeds from sales of equity securities with readily determinable fair
value
Proceeds from sales and capital distributions of equity securities without
readily determinable fair value
$
$
—
—
(688)
—
—
(12,158)
(688)
1,525 $
(12,158)
(20,427) $
—
—
(2,415)
(2,415)
(1,059)
23,592 $
31,753 $
9,759
67
1,330
2,685
Net gains/losses on investment securities resulted in income tax expense (benefit) of $403,000, $(5.4) million and $(282,000) in
2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
115
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, by contractual
maturity, are shown in the following table. Contractual maturities may differ from actual maturities as borrowers may have the
right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities are not included in
the maturity categories in the following maturity summary as actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
the underlying mortgages may be called or prepaid without penalties:
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
Due in one year or less
Due in one to five years
Due in five to ten years
Due after ten years
Mortgage-backed
Total available-for-sale securities
Held-to-maturity securities
Due in one year or less
Due in one to five years
Due in five to ten years
Due after ten years
Mortgage-backed
Total held-to-maturity securities
Less: Allowance for credit losses
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
53,162 $
132,348
82,040
18,705
3,693,559
3,979,814 $
52,945 $
123,985
76,869
15,782
3,233,334
3,502,915 $
119,830 $
63,644
115,734
64,590
3,405,836
3,769,634 $
5,169 $
5,142 $
109,602
99,700
352,474
3,290,318
3,857,263 $
(347)
105,835
98,718
283,506
2,722,267
3,215,468 $
1,340 $
94,705
115,318
365,510
3,064,182
3,641,055 $
(488)
119,275
61,701
105,076
57,478
2,899,487
3,243,017
1,332
89,093
113,758
288,460
2,457,178
2,949,821
Held-to-maturity securities, net of allowance for
credit losses
$
3,856,916
$
3,640,567
At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, securities having a carrying value of $6.9 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively,
were pledged as collateral for public deposits, trust deposits, FHLB advances, securities sold under repurchase agreements and
derivatives. At December 31, 2023, there were no securities of a single issuer, other than U.S. government-sponsored agency
securities, which exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity.
116
(4) Loans
The following table shows the Company’s loan portfolio by category as of the dates shown:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables—property & casualty
Premium finance receivables—life insurance
Consumer and other
Total loans, net of unearned income
Mix:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables—property & casualty
Premium finance receivables—life insurance
Consumer and other
Total loans, net of unearned income
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
$
$
12,832,053
11,344,164
343,976
2,769,666
6,903,529
7,877,943
60,500
42,131,831
$
$
12,549,164
9,950,947
332,698
2,372,383
5,849,459
8,090,998
50,836
39,196,485
30 %
27
1
7
16
19
0
100 %
32 %
25
1
6
15
21
0
100 %
The Company’s loan portfolio is generally comprised of loans to consumers and small to medium-sized businesses, which, for
the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios, are located primarily within the geographic market areas that the banks
serve. Various niche lending businesses, including lease finance and franchise lending, operate on a national level. The
premium finance receivables portfolios are made to customers throughout the United States and Canada. The Company strives
to maintain a loan portfolio that is diverse in terms of loan type, industry, borrower and geographic concentrations. Such
diversification reduces the exposure to economic downturns that may occur in different segments of the economy or in different
industries.
Certain premium finance receivables are recorded net of unearned income. The unearned income portions of such premium
finance receivables were $285.4 million and $224.5 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Total loans, excluding PCD loans, include net deferred loan fees and costs and fair value purchase accounting adjustments
totaling $84.2 million at December 31, 2023 and $71.8 million at December 31, 2022.
Certain real estate loans, including mortgage loans held-for-sale, commercial, consumer, and home equity loans with balances
totaling approximately $21.1 billion and $8.2 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, were pledged as collateral to
secure the availability of borrowings from certain federal agency banks. At December 31, 2023, approximately $12.8 billion of
these pledged loans are included in a pledge of qualifying loans to the FHLB. The remaining $8.3 billion of pledged loans was
used to secure potential borrowings at the FRB discount window. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the banks had outstanding
borrowings of $2.3 billion from the FHLB in connection with these collateral arrangements. See Note (11) “Federal Home Loan
Bank Advances” for a summary of these borrowings.
It is the policy of the Company to review each prospective credit in order to determine the appropriateness and, when required,
the adequacy of security or collateral necessary to obtain when making a loan. The type of collateral, when required, will vary
from liquid assets to real estate. The Company seeks to assure access to collateral, in the event of default, through adherence to
state lending laws and the Company’s credit monitoring procedures.
(5) Allowance for Credit Losses
In accordance with ASC 326, the Company is required to measure the allowance for credit losses of financial assets with similar
risk characteristics on a collective or pooled basis. In considering the segmentation of financial assets measured at amortized
117
cost into pools, the Company considered various risk characteristics in its analysis. Generally, the segmentation utilized
represents the level at which the Company develops and documents its systematic methodology to determine the allowance for
credit losses for the financial asset held at amortized cost, specifically the Company’s loan portfolio and debt securities
classified as held-to-maturity. Below is a summary of the Company’s loan portfolio segments and major debt security types:
Commercial loans: The Company makes commercial loans for many purposes, including working capital lines and leasing
arrangements, that are generally renewable annually and supported by business assets, personal guarantees and additional
collateral. Underlying collateral includes receivables, inventory, enterprise value and the assets of the business. Commercial
business lending is generally considered to involve a slightly higher degree of risk than traditional consumer bank lending. This
portfolio includes a range of industries, including manufacturing, restaurants, franchise, professional services, equipment
finance and leasing, mortgage warehouse lending and industrial. Individually assessed collateral dependent commercial loans
are primarily collateralized by equipment and the enterprise value or assets of the specific business.
Commercial real estate loans, including construction and development, and non-construction: The Company’s commercial real
estate loans are generally secured by a first mortgage lien and assignment of rents on the underlying property (utilized in related
assessment of individually assessed collateral dependent loans). Since most of the Company’s bank branches are located in the
Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin, a significant portion of the Company’s commercial real estate loan
portfolio is located in this region. As the risks and circumstances of such loans in construction phase vary from that of non-
construction commercial real estate loans, the Company assesses the allowance for credit losses separately for these two
segments.
Home equity loans: The Company’s home equity loans and lines of credit are primarily originated by each of the bank
subsidiaries in their local markets where there is a strong understanding of the underlying real estate value. The Company’s
banks monitor and manage these loans, and conduct an automated review of all home equity lines of credit at least twice per
year. This review collects FICO and Bankruptcy scores for each home equity borrower and identifies situations where the credit
strength of the borrower is declining. When other specific events occur that may influence repayment, information such as tax
liens or judgments is collected. The bank subsidiaries use this information to manage loans that may be higher risk and to
determine whether to obtain additional credit information or updated property valuations. In a limited number of cases, the
Company may issue home equity credit together with first mortgage financing, and requests for such financing are evaluated on
a combined basis.
Residential real estate loans, including early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies: The Company’s
residential real estate portfolio includes one- to four-family adjustable rate mortgages, construction loans to individuals and
bridge financing loans for qualifying customers as well as certain long-term fixed rate loans. The Company’s residential
mortgages relate to properties located principally in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin or vacation homes
owned by local residents. Due to interest rate risk considerations, the Company generally sells in the secondary market loans
originated with long-term fixed rates, for which we receive fee income. The Company also selectively retains certain of these
loans within the banks’ own loan portfolios where they are non-agency conforming, or where the terms of the loans make them
favorable to retain. Since this loan portfolio consists primarily of locally originated loans, and since the majority of the
borrowers are longer-term customers with lower LTV ratios, the Company may face a relatively low risk of borrower default
and delinquency. Collateral dependent residential real estate loans that are individually assessed when measuring the allowance
for credit losses are primarily collateralized by such one-to-four family properties noted above. It is not the Company’s current
practice to underwrite, and there are no plans to underwrite subprime, Alt A, no or little documentation loans, or option ARM
loans.
Additionally, early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies include loans in which the Company is eligible or
has exercised its option under the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) securitization program to repurchase
certain delinquent mortgage loans. Such loans were previously transferred by the Company with servicing of such loans
retained. Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) or the U.S. Department
of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.
Premium finance receivables: The Company makes loans to finance insurance premiums related to property and casualty
insurance policies. The loans are indirectly originated by working through independent medium and large insurance agents and
brokers located throughout the United States and Canada. The insurance premiums financed are primarily for commercial
customers’ purchases of liability, property and casualty and other commercial insurance. This lending involves relatively rapid
turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan originations. The Company performs ongoing credit and other reviews of
the agents and brokers, and performs various internal audit steps to mitigate against the risk of fraud.
118
The Company also originates life insurance premium finance receivables. These loans are originated directly with the borrowers
with assistance from life insurance carriers, independent insurance agents, financial advisors and legal counsel. The life
insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these loans often are secured with a letter of credit, marketable
securities or certificates of deposit. In some cases, the Company may make a loan that has a partially unsecured position.
Consumer and other loans: Included in the consumer and other loan category is a wide variety of personal and consumer loans
to individuals. The Company originates consumer loans in order to provide a wider range of financial services to its customers.
Consumer loans generally have shorter terms and higher interest rates than mortgage loans but generally involve more credit
risk than mortgage loans due to the type and nature of the collateral.
U.S. government agency securities: This security type includes debt obligations of certain government-sponsored entities of the
U.S. government such as the Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation and Fannie Mae. Such securities often contain an explicit or implicit guarantee of the U.S. government.
Municipal securities: The Company’s municipal securities portfolio includes bond issues for various municipal government
entities located throughout the United States, including the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin, some of which
are privately placed and non-rated. Though the risk of loss is typically low, default history exists on municipal securities within
the United States.
Mortgage-backed securities: This security type includes debt obligations supported by pools of individual mortgage loans and
issued by certain government-sponsored entities of the U.S. government such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Such securities
are considered to contain an implicit guarantee of the U.S. government.
Corporate notes: The Company’s corporate notes portfolio includes bond issues for various public companies representing a
diversified population of industries. The risk of loss in this portfolio is considered low based on the characteristics of the
investments.
In accordance with ASC 326, the Company elected to not measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest. As such,
accrued interest is written off in a timely manner when deemed uncollectible. Any such write-off of accrued interest will
reverse previously recognized interest income. In addition, the Company elected to not include accrued interest within
presentation and disclosures of the carrying amount of financial assets held at amortized cost. This election is applicable to the
various disclosures included within the Company’s financial statements. Accrued interest related to financial assets held at
amortized cost is included within accrued interest receivable and other assets within the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Condition and totaled $304.5 million at December 31, 2023 and $214.0 million at December 31, 2022.
119
The tables below show the aging of the Company’s loan portfolio by the segmentation noted above at December 31, 2023 and
2022.
As of December 31, 2023
(In thousands)
Loan Balances (includes PCD):
Commercial
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development
Non-construction
Home equity
Residential real estate loans,
excluding early buy-out loans
Premium finance receivables
Property & casualty insurance loans
Life insurance loans
Consumer and other
Total loans, net of unearned
income, excluding early buy-out
loans
Early buy-out loans guaranteed by
U.S. government agencies (1)
Total loans, net of unearned
income
As of December 31, 2022
(In thousands)
Loan Balances (includes PCD):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Construction and development
Non-construction
Home equity
Residential real estate loans,
excluding early buy-out loans
Premium finance receivables
Property & casualty insurance loans
Life insurance loans
Consumer and other
Total loans, net of unearned
income, excluding early buy-out
loans
Early buy-out loans guaranteed by
U.S. government agencies (1)
Total loans, net of unearned
income
Nonaccrual
90+ days
and still
accruing
60-89
days past
due
30-59
days past
due
Current
Total Loans
$
38,940 $
98 $
19,488 $
85,743 $ 12,687,784 $ 12,832,053
2,205
33,254
1,341
15,391
27,590
—
22
—
—
—
—
251
8,264
62
1,343
19,291
2,263
2,080,242
9,199,314
340,310
2,084,041
9,260,123
343,976
2,325
22,942
2,578,425
2,619,083
20,135
—
54
23,236
16,206
25
50,437
45,464
165
6,782,131
7,816,273
60,234
6,903,529
7,877,943
60,500
$
118,743 $
20,287 $
69,857 $
227,648 $ 41,544,713 $ 41,981,248
—
57,688
250
328
92,317
150,583
$
118,743 $
77,975 $
70,107 $
227,976 $ 41,637,030 $ 42,131,831
Nonaccrual
90+ days
and still
accruing
60-89
days past
due
30-59
days past
due
Current
Total Loans
$
35,579 $
462 $
21,128 $
56,696 $ 12,435,299 $ 12,549,164
416
5,971
1,487
10,171
13,470
—
6
—
—
—
—
15,841
17,245
49
361
1,883
—
4,364
14,926
5,260
18
14,390
16,285
2,152
1,471,763
8,439,878
329,059
1,486,930
8,464,017
332,698
9,982
2,183,078
2,207,595
40,557
68,725
224
5,764,665
7,999,768
50,539
5,849,459
8,090,998
50,836
$
67,100 $
33,597 $
47,940 $
209,011 $ 38,674,049 $ 39,031,697
31,279
47,450
984
1,584
83,491
164,788
$
98,379 $
81,047 $
48,924 $
210,595 $ 38,757,540 $ 39,196,485
(1) Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the FHA or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance
limits for certain loans.
Credit Quality Indicators
Credit quality indicators, specifically the Company’s internal risk rating systems, reflect how the Company monitors credit
losses and represents factors used by the Company when measuring the allowance for credit losses. The following discusses the
Company’s credit quality indicators by financial asset.
120
Loan portfolios
The Company’s ability to manage credit risk depends in large part on its ability to properly identify and manage problem loans.
To do so, the Company operates a credit risk rating system under which credit management personnel assign a credit risk rating
(1 to 10 rating, with higher scores indicating higher risk) to each loan at the time of origination and review loans on a regular
basis. For loans measured at amortized cost, these credit risk ratings are also an important aspect of the Company’s allowance
for credit losses measurement methodology. The credit risk rating structure and classifications are shown below:
Pass (risk rating 1 to 5): Based on various factors (liquidity, leverage, etc.), the Company believes asset quality is acceptable
and is deemed to not require additional monitoring by the Company.
Special mention (risk rating 6): Assets in this category are currently protected, potentially weak, but not to the point of
substandard classification. Loss potential is moderate if corrective action is not taken.
Substandard accrual (risk rating 7): Assets in this category have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the
debt. Loss potential is distinct but with no discernible impairment.
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful (risk rating 8 and 9): Assets have all the weaknesses in those classified “substandard accrual”
with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current existing facts,
conditions, and values, improbable.
Loss/fully charged-off (risk rating 10): Assets in this category are considered fully uncollectible. As such, these assets have no
carrying balance on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Condition.
Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies: These loans are measured at fair value and thus excluded from
the measurement of the allowance for credit losses. Credit risk rating assigned to such loans are considered in the measurement
of fair value as well as related guarantees provided by the FHA or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to
indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.
Generally, each loan officer is responsible for monitoring his or her loan portfolio, recommending a credit risk rating for each
loan in his or her portfolio and ensuring the credit risk ratings are appropriate. These credit risk ratings are then ratified by the
bank’s chief credit officer and/or concurrence credit officer. Credit risk ratings are determined by evaluating a number of
factors including: a borrower’s financial strength, cash flow coverage, collateral protection and guarantees.
The Company’s Problem Loan Reporting system includes all such loans described above with credit risk ratings of 6 through 9.
This system is designed to provide an on-going detailed tracking mechanism for each problem loan. Once management
determines that a loan has deteriorated to a point where it has a credit risk rating of 6 or worse, the Company’s Managed Asset
Division performs an overall credit and collateral review. As part of this review, all underlying collateral is identified and the
valuation methodology is analyzed and tracked. As a result of this initial review by the Company’s Managed Asset Division,
the credit risk rating is reviewed and a portion of the outstanding loan balance may be deemed uncollectible and, as a result, no
longer share similar risk characteristics as its related pool. If that is the case, the individual loan is considered collateral
dependent and individually assessed for an allowance for credit loss. The Company’s individual assessment utilizes an
independent re-appraisal of the collateral (unless such a third-party evaluation is not possible due to the unique nature of the
collateral, such as a closely-held business or thinly traded securities). In the case of commercial real estate collateral, an
independent third party appraisal is ordered by the Company’s Real Estate Services Group to determine if there has been any
change in the underlying collateral value. These independent appraisals are reviewed by the Real Estate Services Group and
sometimes by independent third party valuation experts and may be adjusted depending upon market conditions.
Through the credit risk rating process, such loans are reviewed to determine if they are performing in accordance with the
original contractual terms. If the borrower has failed to comply with the original contractual terms, further action may be
required by the Company, including a downgrade in the credit risk rating, movement to non-accrual status or a charge-off. If the
Company determines that a loan amount or portion thereof is uncollectible, the loan’s credit risk rating is immediately
downgraded to an 8 or 9 and the uncollectible amount is charged-off. Any loan that has a partial charge-off continues to be
assigned a credit risk rating of an 8 or 9 for the duration of time that a balance remains outstanding. The Company undertakes a
thorough and ongoing analysis to determine if additional impairment and/or charge-offs are appropriate and to begin a workout
plan for the credit to minimize actual losses. In determining the appropriate charge-off for collateral-dependent loans, the
Company considers the results of appraisals for the associated collateral.
121
The table below shows the Company’s loan portfolio by credit quality indicator and year of origination at December 31, 2023:
As of December 31, 2023
(In thousands)
Loan Balances:
Commercial, industrial and other
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Prior
Revolving
to Term
Year of Origination
Revolving
Total
Loans
$ 2,759,782 $ 2,130,216 $ 1,533,575 $ 649,008 $ 352,589 $ 933,178
$ 3,849,975 $
7,517
$ 12,215,840
31,825
30,484
13,297
66,245
41,655
7,598
85,651
23,049
5,621
17,690
15,412
4,469
2,800
8,005
1,510
7,022
38,125
6,866
101,925
103,405
1,200
1,420
891
48
327,190
250,083
38,940
Total commercial, industrial and other
$ 2,835,388 $ 2,245,714 $ 1,647,896 $ 673,967 $ 377,516 $ 985,191
$ 4,056,505 $
9,876
$ 12,832,053
Construction and development
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
$
335,521 $
851,469 $
443,239 $ 163,025 $
85,644 $
83,050
$
22,219 $
361
$ 1,984,528
—
251
—
—
18,641
—
—
180
2,504
—
—
—
2,375
49,183
24,174
—
—
2,205
—
—
—
—
—
—
18,821
78,487
2,205
Total construction and development
$
335,772 $
853,973 $
461,880 $ 165,400 $ 134,827 $ 109,609
$
22,219 $
361
$ 2,084,041
Non-construction
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
$ 1,501,555 $ 1,828,359 $ 1,363,081 $ 954,632 $ 745,089 $ 2,373,611
$
188,998 $
2,202
$ 8,957,527
9,343
1,189
952
20,721
41,766
1,462
504
3,005
383
19,585
20,696
785
22,496
26,954
387
41,796
58,894
30,243
—
—
—
1,435
—
—
157,142
112,200
33,254
Total non-construction
$ 1,513,039 $ 1,851,046 $ 1,408,235 $ 995,698 $ 794,926 $ 2,504,544
$
188,998 $
3,637
$ 9,260,123
$
— $
57 $
— $
45 $
92 $
6,416
$
320,941 $
2,172
$
329,723
—
—
—
225
105
181
63
—
77
—
—
110
67
—
16
1,667
5,909
774
2,914
1,048
93
—
914
90
4,936
7,976
1,341
$
— $
568 $
140 $
155 $
175 $
14,766
$
324,996 $
3,176
$
343,976
Home equity
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
Total home equity
Residential real estate
Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
Premium finance receivables - property &
casualty
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
Total premium finance receivables - property &
casualty
Premium finance receivables - life
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
$
1,470 $
2,806 $
4,516 $
8,034 $
14,980 $ 118,777
$
— $
470,659
836,948
777,456
214,640
109,466
169,888
1,470
924
100
3,541
3,706
2,280
1,036
1,261
4,517
1,323
1,040
805
736
472
1,507
4,572
4,554
6,182
—
—
—
—
Total residential real estate
$
474,623 $
849,281 $
788,786 $ 225,842 $ 127,161 $ 303,973
$
— $
$ 6,758,490 $
— $
15,119 $
1,873 $
1 $
96,875
2,540
23,047
314
621
4,487
102
3
54
—
1
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
— $
—
—
—
$ 6,880,952 $
5,422 $
15,278 $
1,876 $
1 $
—
$
— $
—
$ 6,903,529
$
403,756 $
673,757 $
878,027 $ 1,067,781 $ 910,951 $ 3,943,671
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total premium finance receivables - life
$
403,756 $
673,757 $
878,027 $ 1,067,781 $ 910,951 $ 3,943,671
$
— $
Consumer and other
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
$
3,531 $
1,362 $
853 $
93 $
340 $
11,630
$
42,515 $
8
2
9
10
8
9
—
—
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
79
32
—
3
12
—
Total consumer and other
$
3,550 $
1,389 $
857 $
93 $
340 $
11,741
$
42,530 $
Total loans
Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
$
1,470 $
2,806 $
4,516 $
8,034 $
14,980 $ 118,777
$
— $
—
$
150,583
122
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
150,583
2,579,057
12,678
11,957
15,391
$ 2,769,666
$ 6,775,483
97,291
3,165
27,590
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ 7,877,943
—
—
—
$ 7,877,943
$
60,324
100
54
22
$
60,500
Pass
Special mention
Substandard accrual
Substandard nonaccrual/doubtful
Total loans
Gross write offs
12,233,294
6,322,168
5,011,350
3,051,097
2,204,172
7,521,444
4,424,648
12,252
40,780,425
139,521
35,390
37,405
91,056
50,061
15,059
147,259
27,318
10,656
38,598
28,581
4,502
38,711
55,316
84,614
131,688
3,420
46,270
104,842
104,465
1,293
2,855
1,805
138
618,158
463,922
118,743
$ 12,447,080 $ 6,481,150 $ 5,201,099 $ 3,130,812 $ 2,345,897 $ 7,873,495
$ 4,635,248 $
17,050
$ 42,131,831
Three months ended December 31, 2023
$
7,318 $
1,853 $
1,566 $
5,825 $
762 $
144
$
Twelve months ended December 31, 2023
19,044
10,204
4,340
11,356
6,444
2,424
— $
—
—
—
$
17,468
53,812
Held-to-maturity debt securities
The Company conducts an assessment of its investment securities, including those classified as held-to-maturity, at the time of
purchase and on at least an annual basis to ensure such investment securities remain within appropriate levels of risk and
continue to perform satisfactorily in fulfilling its obligations. The Company considers, among other factors, the nature of the
securities and credit ratings or financial condition of the issuer. If available, the Company obtains a credit rating for issuers
from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”) for consideration. If no such rating is available for an
issuer, the Company performs an internal rating based on the scale utilized within the loan portfolio as discussed above. For
purposes of the table below, the Company has converted any issuer rating from an NRSRO into the Company’s internal ratings
based on Investment Policy and review by the Company’s management.
As of December 31, 2023
(In thousands)
Amortized Cost Balances:
U.S. government agencies
1-4 internal grade
5-7 internal grade
8-10 internal grade
Total U.S. government agencies
Municipal
1-4 internal grade
5-7 internal grade
8-10 internal grade
Total municipal
Mortgage-backed securities
1-4 internal grade
5-7 internal grade
8-10 internal grade
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Prior
Balance
Year of Origination
Total
$
$
$
— $
156,875 $
147,810 $
25,000 $
4,000 $
2,783
$
336,468
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
156,875 $
147,810 $
25,000 $
4,000 $
2,783
$
336,468
4,176 $
1,038 $
6,909 $
259 $
611 $
159,940
$
172,933
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
4,176 $
1,038 $
6,909 $
259 $
611 $
159,940
$
172,933
$
382,825 $
574,935 $ 2,332,558 $
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ 3,290,318
—
—
$ 3,290,318
Total mortgage-backed securities
$
382,825 $
574,935 $ 2,332,558 $
— $
— $
Corporate notes
1-4 internal grade
5-7 internal grade
8-10 internal grade
Total corporate notes
Total held-to-maturity securities
Less: Allowance for credit losses
Held-to-maturity securities, net of allowance for credit losses
$
$
— $
14,966 $
— $
6,007 $
7,226 $
29,345
$
57,544
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
14,966 $
— $
6,007 $
7,226 $
29,345
$
57,544
$ 3,857,263
(347)
$ 3,856,916
123
Measurement of Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company’s allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan losses, the allowance for unfunded commitment
losses and the allowance for held-to-maturity debt security losses. In accordance with ASC 326, the Company measures the
allowance for credit losses at the time of origination or purchase of a financial asset, representing an estimate of lifetime
expected credit losses on the related asset. When developing its estimate, the Company considers available information relevant
to assessing the collectability of cash flows, from both internal and external sources. Historical credit loss experience is one
input in the estimation process as well as inputs relevant to current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. In
considering past events, the Company considers the relevance, or lack thereof, of historical information due to changes in such
things as financial asset underwriting or collection practices, and changes in portfolio mix due to changing business plans and
strategies. In considering current conditions and forecasts, the Company considers both the current economic environment and
the forecasted direction of the economic environment with emphasis on those factors deemed relevant to or driving changes in
expected credit losses. As significant judgment is required, the review of the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses
is performed quarterly by various committees with participation by the Company’s executive management.
(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses
Allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses
Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses
Allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses
Allowance for credit losses
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
$
$
344,235 $
83,030
427,265
347
427,612 $
270,173
87,275
357,448
488
357,936
The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective or pooled basis when similar risk characteristics exist, based upon
the segmentation discussed above. The Company utilizes modeling methodologies that estimate lifetime credit loss rates on
each pool, including methodologies estimating the probability of default and loss given default on specific segments. Historical
credit loss history is adjusted for reasonable and supportable forecasts developed by the Company on a quantitative or
qualitative basis and incorporates third party economic forecasts. Reasonable and supportable forecasts consider the
macroeconomic factors that are most relevant to evaluating and predicting expected credit losses in the Company's financial
assets. Currently, the Company utilizes an eight quarter forecast period using a single macroeconomic scenario provided by a
third party and reviewed within the Company's governance structure. For periods beyond the ability to develop reasonable and
supportable forecasts, the Company reverts to historical loss rates at an input level, straight-line over a four quarter reversion
period. Expected credit losses are measured over the contractual term of the financial asset with consideration of expected
prepayments. Expected extensions, renewals or modifications of the financial asset are considered when the expected extension,
renewal or modification is contained within the existing agreement and is not unconditionally cancelable. The methodologies
discussed above are applied to both current asset balances on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Condition and off-
balance sheet commitments (i.e. unfunded lending-related commitments).
Assets that do not share similar risk characteristics with a pool are assessed for the allowance for credit losses on an individual
basis. These typically include assets experiencing financial difficulties, including assets rated as substandard nonaccrual and
doubtful. If foreclosure is probable or the asset is considered collateral-dependent, expected credit losses are measured based
upon the fair value of the underlying collateral, adjusted for selling costs, if appropriate. Underlying collateral across the
Company’s segments consist primarily of real estate, land and construction assets, as well as general business assets of the
borrower. As of December 31, 2023, excluding loans carried at fair value, substandard nonaccrual loans totaling $38.1 million
in carrying balance had no related allowance for credit losses.
The Company does not measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable balances because these balances
are written off in a timely manner as a reduction to interest income when assets are placed on nonaccrual status.
124
Loan portfolios
A summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses by loan portfolio (i.e. allowance for loan losses and allowance for
unfunded commitment losses) for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows:
Year Ended
December 31, 2023
(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of
period
Cumulative effect adjustment from the
adoption of ASU 2022-02
Other adjustments
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision for credit losses
Commercial
Commercial
Real Estate
Home
Equity
Residential
Real Estate
Premium
Finance
Receivable
Consumer
and Other
Total
Loans
$
142,769 $
184,352 $
7,573 $
11,585 $
10,671 $
498
357,448
111
—
1,356
—
(15,713)
(15,228)
2,651
39,786
460
52,913
(33)
—
(227)
139
(336)
(692)
—
—
47
(1)
—
741
47
(192)
(21,857)
(595)
(53,812)
21
2,411
4,946
19,262
93
495
8,310
114,531
Allowance for credit losses at period end
$
169,604 $
223,853 $
7,116 $
13,133 $
13,069 $
490 $ 427,265
By measurement method:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Loans at period end:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Loans held at fair value
Year Ended
December 31, 2022
(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of
period
Other adjustments
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision for credit losses
$
17,589 $
3,150 $
— $
135 $
— $
11 $
20,885
152,015
220,703
7,116
12,998
13,069
479
406,380
$
38,940 $
35,459 $
1,341 $
15,391 $
— $
22 $
91,153
12,793,113
11,308,705
342,635
2,599,014
14,781,472
60,478
41,885,417
—
—
—
155,261
—
—
155,261
Commercial
Commercial
Real Estate
Home
Equity
Residential
Real Estate
Premium
Finance
Receivable
Consumer
and Other
Total
Loans
$
119,307
—
(14,141)
4,748
32,855
$
144,583 $
10,699 $
8,782 $
15,859 $
—
(1,379)
701
40,447
—
(432)
319
(3,013)
—
(108)
(471)
(14,275)
77
3,197
5,522
3,673
423
—
(1,081)
136
1,020
498
$ 299,653
(108)
(31,779)
11,503
78,179
357,448
Allowance for loan losses at period end
$
142,769
$
184,352 $
7,573 $
11,585 $
10,671 $
By measurement method:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Loans at period end:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Loan held at fair value
$
5,973
$
61 $
50 $
715 $
— $
—
$
6,799
136,796
184,291
7,523
10,870
10,671
498
350,649
$
38,042
$
21,435 $
10,351 $
20,300 $
— $
69
$
90,197
12,511,122
9,929,512
322,347
2,172,151
13,940,457
50,767
38,926,356
—
—
—
179,932
—
—
179,932
For the year ending December 31, 2023, the Company recognized an approximately $114.5 million provision for credit losses
related to loans and lending agreements, including an approximately $52.9 million provision for credit losses related to the
commercial real estate portfolio. The increased provision was primarily the result of changes in the macroeconomic forecast,
specifically the Company’s macroeconomic forecasts of key model inputs (most notably, Commercial Real Estate Price Index
primarily impacting the commercial real estate portfolio and Baa corporate credit spreads) as well as growth experienced by the
Company in 2023 in various loan portfolios. While uncertainties remain regarding expected economic performance,
macroeconomic forecasts as of December 31, 2023 assume that the impact of those uncertainties is more severe compared to
that assumed at December 31, 2022. Other key drivers of provision for credit losses in these portfolios include, but are not
limited to, loan risk rating migration and net charge-offs in 2023 totaled $45.5 million.
125
Held-to-maturity debt securities
The allowance for credit losses on the Company’s held-to-maturity debt securities is presented as a reduction to the amortized
cost basis of held-to-maturity securities on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition. For the years ended
December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company recognized approximately a negative $141,000 and $410,000,
respectively, of provision for credit losses related to held-to-maturity securities. At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022,
the Company did not identify any held-to-maturity debt securities within its portfolio that would require a charge-off.
Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulties
The Company’s approach to restructuring or modifying loans is built on its credit risk rating system, which requires credit
management personnel to assign a credit risk rating to each loan. In each case, the loan officer is responsible for recommending
a credit risk rating for each loan and ensuring the credit risk ratings are appropriate. These credit risk ratings are then reviewed
and approved by the bank’s chief credit officer and/or concurrence credit officer. Credit risk ratings are determined by
evaluating a number of factors, including a borrower’s financial strength, cash flow coverage, collateral protection and
guarantees. The Company’s credit risk rating scale is one through ten with higher scores indicating higher risk. In the case of
loans rated six or worse following modification, the Company’s Managed Assets Division evaluates the loan and the credit risk
rating and determines that the loan has been restructured to be reasonably assured of repayment and of performance according
to the modified terms and is supported by a current, well-documented credit assessment of the borrower’s financial condition
and prospects for repayment under the revised terms. Based on the Company’s credit risk rating system, it considers that
borrowers whose credit risk rating is 5 or better are not experiencing financial difficulties.
Restructurings may arise when, due to financial difficulties experienced by the borrower, the Company obtains through physical
possession one or more collateral assets in satisfaction of all or part of an existing credit. Once possession is obtained, the
Company reclassifies the appropriate portion of the remaining balance of the credit from loans to other real estate owned
(“OREO”), which is included within other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. For any residential real estate
property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, the Company is considered to possess the related collateral only if legal title
is obtained upon completion of foreclosure, or the borrower conveys all interest in the residential real estate property to the
Company through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. At December 31, 2023, the Company
had $720,000 of foreclosed residential real estate properties included within OREO. Further, the recorded investment in
residential mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which foreclosure proceedings are in process totaled
$53.3 million and $59.5 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The table below presents a summary of the balance immediately following the modification of loans to borrowers experiencing
financial difficulties during the year ended December 31, 2023:
Year Ended
December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial, industrial and
other
Commercial real estate
Construction
Non-construction
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables
Property and casualty
insurance loans
Total loans
Weighted average magnitude
of modifications:
Duration of extension of
term
Reduction of interest rate
Duration of delayed
contractual payment terms
Total (1)
Percentage of
Total Class of
Loan
Extension of
Term (1)
Reduction of
Interest
Rate (1)
Delay in
Contractual
Payments (1)
Extension of
Term and
Reduction of
Interest Rate (1)
$
41,223
0.3 % $
3,367 $
314 $
37,069 $
473
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
—
467
203
1,537
62
—
827
—
271
59
—
1,310
—
—
—
0.1 % $
5,636 $
1,471 $
38,379 $
2,504
4,376
499
305
8
8,165
2,504
6,980
702
2,113
129
$
53,651
28 months
198 bps
16 months
(1) Balances represent the recorded investment in the loan at the time of the restructuring.
126
The following table presents a summary of all loans for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties modified during the year
ended December 31, 2023, and such loans that were in payment default under the restructured terms during the year ended
December 31, 2023:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial, industrial and other
Commercial real estate
Construction
Non-construction
Home equity
Residential real estate
Premium finance receivables
Property and casualty insurance loans
Total loans
As of December 31, 2023
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Total (2)
Payments in Default (1)(2)
$
$
41,223 $
2,504
6,980
702
2,113
129
53,651 $
19,361
2,504
4,851
203
767
129
27,815
(1)
(2)
Modified loans considered to be in payment default are over 30 days past due subsequent to the restructuring.
Balances represent the recorded investment in the loan at the time of the restructuring.
TDRs
Reporting periods prior to the adoption of ASU 2022-02 as of January 1, 2023 present information on loan modifications
representing TDRs under the prior accounting standards and related disclosure requirements.
At December 31, 2022, the Company had $41.1 million in loans modified in TDRs. The $41.1 million in TDRs represented 191
credits in which economic concessions were granted to certain borrowers to better align the terms of their loans with their
current ability to pay.
127
The tables below present a summary of the post-modification balance of loans restructured during the years ended
December 31, 2022 and 2021 which represent TDRs:
Year ended
December 31, 2022
(In thousands)
Commercial
Commercial,
industrial and other
Commercial real estate
Non-construction
Residential real estate
and other
Total loans
Year ended
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
Commercial
Commercial,
industrial and other
Commercial real estate
Non-construction
Residential real estate
and other
Total loans
Total (1)(2)
Extension at
Below Market
Terms (2)
Reduction of
Interest Rate (2)
Modification to
Interest-only
Payments (2)
Forgiveness of Debt (2)
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
5 $
468
4 $
305
1 $
85
2 $
248
— $
—
3
32
8,833
4,076
1
31
1,178
4,075
1
20
1,178
3,002
3
—
8,833
—
—
—
40 $ 13,377
36 $
5,558
22 $
4,265
5 $
9,081
— $
—
—
—
Total (1)(2)
Extension at
Below Market
Terms (2)
Reduction of
Interest Rate (2)
Modification to
Interest-only
Payments (2)
Forgiveness of Debt (2)
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
16 $
5,074
7 $
847
1 $
300
— $
—
— $
5
43
2,944
5,851
4
40
2,401
5,683
2
17
656
4,123
1
9
113
4,227
—
—
64 $ 13,869
51 $
8,931
20 $
5,079
10 $
4,340
— $
—
—
—
—
(1) TDRs may have more than one modification representing a concession. As such, TDRs during the period may be
represented in more than one of the categories noted above.
(2) Balances represent the recorded investment in the loan at the time of the restructuring.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, $13.4 million, or 40 loans, were determined to be TDRs, compared to $13.9 million,
or 64 loans, in the year ended December 31, 2021. Of these loans extended at below market terms, the weighted average
extension had a term of approximately 69 months in 2022 compared to 83 months in 2021. Further, the weighted average
decrease in the stated interest rate for loans with a reduction of interest rate during the period was approximately 88 basis
points, compared to 137 basis points during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Interest-only payment
terms were approximately eight months during the year ended 2022 compared to three months and for the year ended 2021.
Additionally, no principal balances were forgiven on the loans noted above in 2022 and 2021.
The tables below present a summary of all loans restructured in TDRs during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021,
and such loans which were in payment default under the restructured terms during the respective periods:
(In thousands)
Commercial
Commercial, industrial and other
Commercial real-estate
Non-construction
Residential real estate and other
Total loans
Year Ended December 31, 2022
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Total (1)(3)
Payments in
Default (2)(3)
Total (1)(3)
Payments in
Default (2)(3)
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Balance
5 $
468
2 $
185
16 $ 5,074
1 $
199
3
8,833
—
—
5
2,944
3
2,276
32
4,076
40 $ 13,377
3
5 $
524
709
43
5,851
64 $ 13,869
2
116
6 $ 2,591
(1) Total TDRs represent all loans restructured in TDRs during the year indicated.
(2) TDRs considered to be in payment default are over 30 days past-due subsequent to the restructuring.
(3) Balances represent the recorded investment in the loan at the time of the restructuring.
128
(6) Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)
Following is a summary of the changes in the carrying value of MSRs, accounted for at fair value, for the years ended
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
(In thousands)
Fair value at beginning of year
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained
Servicing rights sold
Estimate of changes in fair value due to:
Early buyout options (“EBO”) exercised
Payoffs and paydowns
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions
Fair value at end of year
Unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans serviced for others
December 31,
December 31,
December 31,
2023
2022
2021
230,225 $
28,610
(30,170)
147,571 $
46,221
—
92,081
72,754
—
48
(17,108)
(19,149)
192,456 $
12,007,165 $
(176)
(23,455)
60,064
230,225 $
14,052,596 $
(749)
(34,788)
18,273
147,571
13,126,254
$
$
$
The Company recognizes MSR assets upon the sale of residential real estate loans to external third parties when it retains the
obligation to service the loans and the servicing fee is more than adequate compensation. The initial recognition of MSR assets
from loans sold with servicing retained and subsequent changes in fair value of all MSRs are recognized in mortgage banking
revenue. MSRs are subject to changes in value from actual and expected prepayment of the underlying loans.
The estimation of fair value related to MSRs is partly impacted by the Company exercising its EBO on eligible loans previously
sold to the GNMA. Under such optional repurchase program, financial institutions acting as servicers are allowed to buy back
from the securitized loan pool individual delinquent mortgage loans meeting certain criteria for which the institution was the
original transferor of such loans. At the option of the servicer and without prior authorization from GNMA, the servicer may
repurchase such delinquent loans for an amount equal to the remaining principal balance of the loan. At the time of such
repurchase, any MSR value related to such loans is derecognized.
The MSR asset fair value is determined by using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the objective characteristics of
the portfolio as well as subjective valuation parameters that purchasers of servicing would apply to such portfolios sold into the
secondary market. The subjective factors include loan prepayment speeds, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic
factors. The Company uses a third party to assist in the valuation of MSRs.
Periodically the Company will purchase options for the right to purchase securities not currently held within the banks’
investment portfolios or enter into interest rate swaps in which the Company elects to not designate such derivatives as hedging
instruments. These option and swap transactions are designed primarily to economically hedge a portion of the fair value
adjustments related to the Company’s MSRs. The gain or loss associated with these derivative contracts is included in mortgage
banking revenue. For more information regarding these hedges outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022,
see Note (21) “Derivative Financial Instruments” in Item 8 of this report.
(7) Business Combinations
On April 3, 2023, the Company completed its acquisition of Rothschild & Co Asset Management US Inc. and Rothschild & Co
Risk Based Investments LLC from Rothschild & Co North America Inc. (collectively, “Rothschild & Co Asset Management
U.S.”). As of the acquisition date, the Company acquired approximately $12.6 million in net assets. As the transaction was
determined to be a business combination, the Company recorded goodwill of approximately $2.6 million on the purchase.
129
(8) Goodwill and Other Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets
A summary of the Company’s goodwill assets by business segment is presented in the following table:
(In thousands)
Community banking
Specialty finance
Wealth management
Total
January 1,
2023
Goodwill
Acquired
Impairment
Loss
Goodwill
Adjustments
December 31,
2023
$
$
545,671 $
38,480
69,373
653,524 $
— $
—
2,622
2,622 $
— $
—
—
— $
— $
526
—
526 $
545,671
39,006
71,995
656,672
The wealth management unit’s goodwill increased $2.6 million in 2023 as a result of the Rothschild & Co Asset Management
U.S. acquisition. The specialty finance segment’s goodwill increased $526,000 in 2023 as a result of foreign currency
translation adjustments related to prior Canadian acquisitions.
The Company assesses each reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis and considers potential
indicators of impairment at each reporting date between annual goodwill impairment tests. At October 1, 2023, the Company
utilized a qualitative approach for its annual goodwill impairment tests of the community banking, specialty finance and wealth
management reporting units and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of all reporting units exceeded
the respective carrying value of such reporting unit at that time.
At each reporting date between annual goodwill impairment tests, the Company considers potential indicators of impairment.
The Company assessed whether events and circumstances as of each reporting date in 2023 resulted in it being more likely than
not that the fair value of any reporting unit was less than its carrying value. Potential impairment indicators considered include
the condition of the economy and banking industry; government intervention and regulatory updates; the impact of recent
events to financial performance and cost factors of the reporting units; performance of the Company’s stock and other relevant
events. As of December 31, 2023, the Company identified no indicators of goodwill impairment subsequent to its analysis as of
October 1, 2023 within the community banking, specialty finance or wealth management reporting units and the Company
determined it was more likely than not that the fair value of all reporting units exceeded the respective carrying value of such
reporting unit.
130
A summary of acquisition-related intangible assets as of the dates shown and the expected amortization of finite-lived
acquisition-related intangible assets as of December 31, 2023 is as follows:
(In thousands)
Community banking segment:
Core deposit intangibles with finite lives:
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Trademark with indefinite lives:
Carrying amount
Total net carrying amount
Specialty finance segment:
Customer list intangibles with finite lives:
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Wealth management segment:
Customer list and other intangibles with finite lives:
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Total acquisition-related intangible assets:
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Total acquisition-related intangible assets, net
Estimated amortization for the year-ended:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
55,206 $
(46,125)
9,081 $
5,800
14,881 $
1,963 $
(1,837)
126 $
26,630 $
(18,748)
7,882 $
89,599 $
(66,710)
22,889 $
$
55,206
(42,501)
12,705
5,800
18,505
1,962
(1,785)
177
20,430
(16,926)
3,504
83,398
(61,212)
22,186
4,301
3,482
2,772
2,157
1,591
The core deposit intangibles recognized in connection with prior bank acquisitions are amortized over a ten-year period on an
accelerated basis. The customer list intangibles recognized in connection with the purchase of life insurance premium finance
assets in 2009 are being amortized over an 18-year period on an accelerated basis. The customer list and other intangibles
recognized in connection with prior acquisitions within the wealth management segment are being amortized over a period of
up to ten-years on a straight-line basis. The increase in wealth management segment customer list and other intangibles relates
to the acquisition in the second quarter of 2023, which is being amortized over a period of ten years on an accelerated basis.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of certain trade and domain names recognized in connection with the acquisition of
certain assets of Veterans First Mortgage in 2018. As indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, the Company assesses
impairment on at least an annual basis.
Total amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangibles in 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $5.5 million, $6.1 million and
$7.7 million, respectively.
131
(9) Premises, Software and Equipment, Net
A summary of premises, software and equipment at December 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows:
(In thousands)
Land
Buildings and leasehold improvements
Furniture, equipment and computer software
Construction in progress
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
Total premises, software, and equipment, net
December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
$
166,036 $
687,326
333,176
26,443
1,212,981 $
464,015
748,966 $
166,707
674,887
307,468
27,498
1,176,560
411,762
764,798
Depreciation and amortization expense related to premises, software and equipment totaled $56.9 million in 2023, $53.1 million
in 2022 and $54.0 million in 2021.
(10) Deposits
The following is a summary of deposits at December 31, 2023 and 2022:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance:
Non-interest bearing
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits
Wealth management deposits
Money market
Savings
Time certificates of deposit
Total deposits
Mix:
Non-interest bearing
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits
Wealth management deposits
Money market
Savings
Time certificates of deposit
Total deposits
2023
2022
$
$
10,420,401
5,797,649
1,614,499
15,149,215
5,790,334
6,625,072
45,397,170
$
$
12,668,160
5,591,986
2,463,833
12,886,795
4,556,635
4,735,135
42,902,544
23 %
13
4
33
13
14
100 %
30 %
13
5
30
11
11
100 %
Wealth management deposits represent deposit balances (primarily money market accounts) at the Company’s subsidiary banks
from brokerage customers of Wintrust Investments, CDEC and trust and asset management customers of the Company.
The scheduled maturities of time certificates of deposit at December 31, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
(In thousands)
Due within one year
Due in one to two years
Due in two to three years
Due in three to four years
Due in four to five years
Due after five years
Total time certificate of deposits
2023
2022
5,994,905 $
558,387
42,559
16,251
12,966
4
6,625,072 $
3,627,816
887,886
193,581
13,431
12,319
102
4,735,135
$
$
132
The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities of uninsured deposits, specifically the portion of deposit balances in
excess of the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000, at December 31, 2023 and 2022:
(In thousands)
Maturing within three months
After three but within six months
After six but within 12 months
After 12 months
Total
2023
2022
315,495 $
327,183
466,699
73,534
1,182,911 $
518,457
421,242
232,120
165,353
1,337,172
$
$
Time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or more were $2.5 billion and $2.0 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022,
respectively.
(11) Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
A summary of the outstanding FHLB advances at December 31, 2023 and 2022, is as follows:
(In thousands)
4.31% advance due January 2023
0.00% advance due April 2024
2.98% advance due August 2024
0.00% advance due April 2026
3.70% advance due July 2030
1.76% advance due August 2032
1.93% advance due August 2032
2.81% advance due September 2032
3.08% advance due September 2032
2.96% advance due December 2032
2.98% advance due December 2032
3.13% advance due February 2033
2.95% advance due May 2033
3.72% advance due July 2033
Total FHLB advances
2023
2022
$
$
— $
442
25,000
629
150,000
—
—
500,000
500,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
150,000
2,326,071 $
290,000
442
25,000
629
—
250,000
250,000
500,000
500,000
250,000
250,000
—
—
—
2,316,071
FHLB advances consist of obligations of the banks and are collateralized by qualifying commercial and residential real estate
and home equity loans and certain securities. The banks have arrangements with the FHLB whereby, based on available
collateral, they could have borrowed an additional $6.5 billion at December 31, 2023.
FHLB advances are stated at par value of the debt adjusted for unamortized prepayment fees paid at the time of prior
restructurings of FHLB advances and unamortized fair value adjustments recorded in connection with advances acquired
through acquisitions and debt issuance costs. Unamortized prepayment fees are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense
using the effective interest method.
In 2023, the Company was required to repay approximately $500.0 million of FHLB advances prior to the respective maturity
date as a result of call date terms within the related agreements. Approximately $750.0 million of the FHLB advances
outstanding at December 31, 2023 currently have varying put or call dates over the next 12 months ranging from January 2024
to December 2024. At December 31, 2023, the weighted average contractual interest rate on FHLB advances was 3.07%.
(12) Subordinated Notes
At December 31, 2023, the Company had outstanding subordinated notes totaling $437.9 million compared to $437.4 million at
December 31, 2022. In 2019, the Company issued $300.0 million of subordinated notes receiving $296.7 million in proceeds,
net of underwriting discount. The notes have a stated interest rate of 4.85% and mature in June 2029. In 2014, the Company
issued $140.0 million of subordinated notes receiving $139.1 million in proceeds, net of underwriting discount. The notes have
a stated interest rate of 5.00% and mature in June 2024.
133
In connection with the issuance of subordinated notes in 2019 and 2014, the Company incurred costs totaling $3.3 million and
$1.3 million, respectively. These costs are a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the subordinated notes and are
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method. At December 31, 2023, the unamortized balances of costs for
both issuances were approximately $2.6 million. These subordinated notes qualify as Tier II capital under the regulatory capital
requirements, subject to restrictions.
(13) Other Borrowings
The following is a summary of other borrowings at December 31, 2023 and 2022:
(In thousands)
Notes payable
Short-term borrowings
Other
Secured borrowings
Total other borrowings
Notes Payable
2023
2022
171,282 $
13,430
59,204
401,897
645,813 $
199,793
17,612
61,267
317,942
596,614
$
$
On September 18, 2018, the Company entered into a credit agreement (as amended, the “Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement”) with certain unaffiliated banks. The Credit Agreement consists of a $200.0 million term loan facility and a
$100.0 million revolving credit facility.
On, July 17, 2023, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated December 12, 2022. The Amendment designates 450 Northbrook Trust, a subsidiary of the Company, as a
“Specified Subsidiary” under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which excludes it from the scope of certain
provisions of the burdensome agreements covenant in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
On December 11, 2023, the Company entered into a second amendment (the “Second Agreement”) to the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment provides for, among other things, an extension of the maturity date of the
revolving credit facility from December 11, 2023 to December 9, 2024.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for, among other things, a maturity date for the revolving credit facility
of December 9, 2024, and a maturity date for the term loan facility of December 12, 2027. The Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement also provides for certain financial covenants that must be met by the Company for so long as any amounts or
commitments under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are still outstanding.
Borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that are considered “Base Rate Loans” bear interest at a rate
equal to the sum of (1) 75 basis points plus (2) the highest of (a) the prime rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points,
and (c) Term SOFR for a one-month tenor in effect on such day plus 110 basis points. Borrowings under the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement that are considered “Term SOFR Loans” bear interest at a rate equal to the sum of (1) 160 basis
points plus (2) Term SOFR for the applicable interested period. A commitment fee is payable quarterly in arrears in an amount
equal to 0.30% of the actual daily amount by which the lenders’ commitments under the revolving credit facility exceeded the
amount outstanding under such facility. The Company is required to make monthly or quarterly (as applicable) payments of
interest in respect of all loans under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, and quarterly payments of principal in
respect of the loans under the term loan facility.
Borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are secured by pledges of and first priority perfected security
interests in the Company’s equity interest in its bank subsidiaries and contain several restrictive covenants, including the
maintenance of various capital adequacy levels, asset quality and profitability ratios, and certain restrictions on dividends and
other indebtedness. As of December 31, 2023, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The term loan facility
and revolving credit facility under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are available to be utilized, as needed, to
provide capital to fund continued growth at the Company’s banks and to serve as an interim source of funds for acquisitions,
common stock repurchases or other general corporate purposes.
The term debt facility is stated at par of the current outstanding balance of the debt adjusted for unamortized costs paid by the
Company in relation to the debt issuance. Unamortized costs paid by the Company in relation to the issuance of the revolving
credit facility are classified in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
134
As of December 31, 2023, the outstanding principal balance under the term loan facility was $171.3 million and there was no
outstanding principal balance under the revolving credit facility.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings include securities sold under repurchase agreements of customer sweep accounts in connection with
master repurchase agreements at the banks. These borrowings totaled $13.4 million and $17.6 million at December 31, 2023
and 2022, respectively. The Company records securities sold under repurchase agreements at their gross value and does not
offset positions on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had pledged securities
related to its customer balances in sweep accounts of $17.4 million. Securities pledged for customer balances in sweep accounts
and short-term borrowings from brokers are maintained under the Company’s control and consist of mortgage-backed
securities. These securities are included in the available-for-sale portfolio as reflected on the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Condition.
The following is a summary of these securities pledged as of December 31, 2023 disaggregated by investment category and
maturity of the related customer sweep account, and reconciled to the outstanding balance of securities sold under repurchase
agreements:
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities pledged
Mortgage-backed securities pledged
Excess collateral
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
Other Borrowings
Overnight
Sweep
Collateral
$ 17,351
3,921
$ 13,430
Other borrowings represent a fixed-rate promissory note (“Fixed-Rate Promissory Note”) issued by the Company in June 2017.
Amendments to the Fixed-Rate Promissory Note since issuance increased the principal amount to $66.4 million, reduced the
interest rate to 1.70% and extended the maturity date to March 31, 2025. The Fixed-Rate Promissory Note relates to and is
secured by three office buildings owned by the Company. At December 31, 2023, the Fixed-Rate Promissory Note had a
balance of $59.2 million compared to $61.3 million at December 31, 2022. Under the Fixed-Rate Promissory Note, during the
twelve months ended December 31, 2023, the Company made monthly principal and interest payments. The Fixed-Rate
Promissory Note contains several restrictive covenants, including the maintenance of various capital adequacy levels, asset
quality and profitability ratios, and certain restrictions on dividends and indebtedness. At December 31, 2023, the Company
was in compliance with all such covenants.
Secured Borrowings
Secured borrowings primarily represent transactions to sell an undivided co-ownership interest in all receivables owed to the
Company’s subsidiary, First Insurance Funding of Canada (“FIFC Canada”). In December 2014, FIFC Canada sold such
interest to an unrelated third party in exchange for a cash payment of approximately C$150 million pursuant to a receivables
purchase agreement (“Receivables Purchase Agreement”). Amendments to the Receivables Purchase Agreement since issuance
increased the total payments to C$520 million, extended the maturity date to December 15, 2024, and increased the interest rate
spread from 0.775% to 0.825%. Additionally, since Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) will cease being used in Canada
in June 2024, references to CDOR changed to the Benchmark rate. These transactions were not considered sales of receivables
and, as such, related proceeds received are reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition as a secured
borrowing owed to the unrelated third party, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, and translated to the Company’s reporting
currency as of the respective date. At December 31, 2023, the translated balance of the secured borrowing totaled $392.5
million compared to $309.7 million at December 31, 2022. The interest rate under the Receivables Purchase Agreement is the
Canadian Commercial Paper Rate plus 82.5 basis points.
The remaining $9.4 million within secured borrowings at December 31, 2023 represents other sold interests in certain loans by
the Company that were not considered sales and, as such, related proceeds received are reflected on the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Condition as a secured borrowing owed to the various unrelated third parties.
135
(14) Junior Subordinated Debentures
As of December 31, 2023, the Company owned 100% of the common securities of eleven trusts, Wintrust Capital Trust III,
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV, Wintrust Statutory Trust V, Wintrust Capital Trust VII, Wintrust Capital Trust VIII, Wintrust
Capital Trust IX, Northview Capital Trust I, Town Bankshares Capital Trust I, First Northwest Capital Trust I, Suburban
Illinois Capital Trust II, and Community Financial Shares Statutory Trust II (the “Trusts”) set up to provide long-term
financing. The Northview, Town, First Northwest, Suburban and Community Financial Shares capital trusts were acquired as
part of the acquisitions of Northview Financial Corporation, Town Bankshares, Ltd., First Northwest Bancorp, Inc., Suburban
Illinois Bancorp, Inc. and Community Financial Shares, Inc., respectively. The Trusts were formed for purposes of issuing trust
preferred securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the issuance of the trust preferred securities and
common securities solely in junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company (or assumed by the Company in connection
with an acquisition), with the same maturities and interest rates as the trust preferred securities. The junior subordinated
debentures are the sole assets of the Trusts. In each Trust, the common securities represent approximately 3% of the junior
subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities represent approximately 97% of the junior subordinated debentures.
The Trusts are reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as unconsolidated subsidiaries. Accordingly, in the
Consolidated Statements of Condition, the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to the Trusts are reported as
liabilities and the common securities of the Trusts, all of which are owned by the Company, are included in investment
securities.
The following table provides a summary of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
The junior subordinated debentures represent the par value of the obligations owed to the Trusts.
(Dollars in thousands)
Wintrust Capital Trust III
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV
Wintrust Statutory Trust V
Wintrust Capital Trust VII
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII
Wintrust Capital Trust IX
Northview Capital Trust I
Town Bankshares Capital Trust I
First Northwest Capital Trust I
Suburban Illinois Capital Trust II
Community Financial Shares
Statutory Trust II
Total
Junior
Subordinated
Debentures
Common
Securities
Trust
Preferred
Securities
Rate Structure (1)
774 $ 25,000 $ 25,774 $ 25,774 S+0.26161+3.25
2022
2023
$
Contractual
rate at
12/31/2023
Issue Date
Maturity
Date
Earliest
Redemption
Date
8.91 %
04/2003
04/2033
619
1,238
1,550
1,238
1,547
186
186
155
464
20,000
40,000
50,000
25,000
50,000
6,000
6,000
5,000
20,619
41,238
51,550
26,238
51,547
6,186
6,186
5,155
20,619 S+0.26161+2.80
41,238 S+0.26161+2.60
51,550 S+0.26161+1.95
26,238 S+0.26161+1.45
51,547 S+0.26161+1.63
6,186 S+0.26161+3.00
6,186 S+0.26161+3.00
5,155 S+0.26161+3.00
15,000
15,464
15,464 S+0.26161+1.75
8.39
8.19
7.60
7.04
7.28
8.64
8.64
8.59
7.40
12/2003
12/2033
05/2004
05/2034
12/2004
03/2035
08/2005
09/2035
09/2006
09/2036
08/2003
11/2033
08/2003
11/2033
05/2004
05/2034
12/2006
12/2036
04/2008
12/2008
06/2009
03/2010
09/2010
09/2011
08/2008
08/2008
05/2009
12/2011
109
3,500
3,609
3,609 S+0.26161+1.62
7.27
06/2007
09/2037
06/2012
$ 253,566 $ 253,566
7.82 %
(1) The interest rates on the variable rate junior subordinated debentures are based on the three-month Chicago
Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and reset on a quarterly basis.
At December 31, 2023, the weighted average contractual interest rate on the junior subordinated debentures was 7.82%.
Distributions on the common and preferred securities issued by the Trusts are payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the
interest rates being earned by the Trusts on the junior subordinated debentures. Interest expense on the junior subordinated
debentures is deductible for income tax purposes.
Under AIRLA and Part 253 of Regulation ZZ (Rule 253), after June 30, 2023, the interest rate on the junior subordinated
debentures, by operation of law, changed their base rate from USD LIBOR to CME Term SOFR of the same tenor, plus an
applicable tenor spread adjustment. CME Term SOFR is an indicative, forward-looking measurement of daily overnight
SOFR. CME Term SOFR is published by CME Group Inc., as administrator of that rate. The calculation agent for any series of
the junior subordinated debentures may also make additional administrative conforming changes to the terms of that series of
the junior subordinated debentures under AIRLA and Rule 253.
The Company has guaranteed the payment of distributions and payments upon liquidation or redemption of the trust preferred
securities, in each case to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The Company and the Trusts believe that, taken together, the
obligations of the Company under the guarantees, the junior subordinated debentures, and other related agreements provide, in
the aggregate, a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee, on a subordinated basis, of all of the obligations of the Trusts
136
under the trust preferred securities. Subject to certain limitations, the Company has the right to defer the payment of interest on
the junior subordinated debentures at any time, or from time to time, for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The
trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the junior subordinated
debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. The junior subordinated debentures are redeemable in whole or in part prior
to maturity at any time after the earliest redemption dates shown in the table, and earlier at the discretion of the Company if
certain conditions are met, and, in any event, only after the Company has obtained Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) approval, if
then required under applicable guidelines or regulations.
At December 31, 2023, the Company included $245.5 million of the junior subordinated debentures, net of common securities,
in Tier 2 regulatory capital.
(15) Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table presents revenue from contracts with customers, disaggregated by the revenue source:
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue from contracts with customers
Brokerage and insurance product
commissions
Trust
Asset management
Total wealth management
Location in income statement
Wealth management
Wealth management
Wealth management
Mortgage broker fees
Mortgage banking
Service charges on deposit accounts
Service charges on deposit accounts
Administrative services
Card related fees
Other deposit related fees
Other non-interest income
Other non-interest income
Other non-interest income
Total revenue from contracts
with customers
Wealth Management Revenue
December 31,
2023
Years Ended
December 31,
2022
December 31,
2021
$
18,645 $
17,668 $
24,190
87,772
130,607
844
55,250
5,599
13,789
14,354
33,460
75,486
126,614
854
58,574
6,713
11,474
13,490
20,710
21,930
81,379
124,019
787
54,168
5,689
9,210
13,299
$
220,443 $
217,719 $
207,172
Wealth management revenue is comprised of brokerage and insurance product commissions, managed money fees and trust and
asset management revenue of the Company's four wealth management subsidiaries: Wintrust Investments, Great Lakes
Advisors, CTC and CDEC. All wealth management revenue is recognized in the wealth management segment.
Brokerage and insurance product commissions consists primarily of commissions earned from trade execution services on
behalf of customers and from selling mutual funds, insurance and other investment products to customers. For trade execution
services, the Company recognizes commissions and receives payment from the brokerage customers at the point of transaction
execution. Commissions received from the investment or insurance product providers are recognized at the point of sale of the
product. The Company also receives trail and other commissions from providers for certain plans. These are generally based on
qualifying account values and are recognized once the performance obligation, specific to each provider, is satisfied on a
monthly, quarterly or annual basis.
Trust revenue is earned primarily from trust and custody services that are generally performed over time as well as fees earned
on funds held during the facilitation of tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions. Revenue is determined periodically based
on a schedule of fees applied to the value of each customer account using a time-elapsed method to measure progress toward
complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. Fees are typically billed on a calendar month or quarter basis in advance or
in arrears depending upon the contract. Upfront fees received related to the facilitation of tax-deferred like-kind exchange
transactions are deferred until the transaction is completed. Additional fees earned for certain extraordinary services performed
on behalf of the customers are recognized when the service has been performed.
Asset management revenue is earned from money management and advisory services that are performed over time. Revenue is
based primarily on the market value of assets under management or administration using a time-elapsed method to measure
137
progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. Fees are typically billed on a calendar month or quarter
basis in advance or in arrears depending upon the contract. Certain programs provide the customer with an option of paying
fees as a percentage of the account value or incurring commission charges for each trade similar to brokerage and insurance
product commissions. Trade commissions and any other fees received for additional services are recognized at a point in time
once the performance obligation is satisfied.
Mortgage Broker Fees
For customers desiring a mortgage product not currently offered by the Company, the Company may refer such customers and,
with permission, direct such customers' applications to certain third party mortgage brokers. Mortgage broker fees are received
from these brokers for such customer referrals upon settlement of the underlying mortgage. The Company's entitlement to the
consideration is contingent on the settlement of the mortgage which is highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company's
influence, such as the third party broker's underwriting requirements. Also, the uncertainty surrounding the consideration could
be resolved in varying lengths of time, dependent upon the third party brokers. Therefore, mortgage broker fees are recognized
at the settlement of the underlying mortgage when the consideration is received. Broker fees are recognized in the community
banking segment.
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
Service charges on deposit accounts include fees charged to deposit customers for various services, including account analysis
services, and are based on factors such as the size and type of customer, type of product and number of transactions. The fees
are based on a standard schedule of fees and, depending on the nature of the service performed, the service is performed at a
point in time or over a period of a month. When the service is performed at a point in time, the Company recognizes and
receives revenue when the service has been performed. When the service is performed over a period of a month, the Company
recognizes and receives revenue in the month the service has been performed. Service charges on deposit accounts are
recognized in the community banking segment.
Administrative Services
Administrative services revenue is earned from providing outsourced administrative services, such as data processing of
payrolls, billing and cash management services, to temporary staffing service clients located throughout the United States. Fees
are charged periodically (typically a payroll cycle) and computed in accordance with the contractually determined rate applied
to the total gross billings administered for the period. The revenue is recognized over the period using a time-elapsed method to
measure progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. Other fees are charged on a per occurrence basis
as the service is provided in the billing cycle. The Company has certain contracts with customers to perform outsourced
administrative services and short-term accounts receivable financing. For these contracts, the total fee is allocated between the
administrative services revenue and interest income during the client onboarding process based on the specific client and
services provided. Administrative services revenue is recognized in the specialty finance segment.
Card and Deposit Related Fees
Card related fees include interchange and merchant revenue, and fees related to debit and credit cards. Interchange revenue is
related to the Company issued debit cards. Other deposit related fees primarily include pay by phone processing fees, ATM and
safe deposit box fees, check order charges and foreign currency related fees. Card and deposit related fees are generally based
on volume of transactions and are recognized at the point in time when the service has been performed. For any consideration
that is constrained, the revenue is recognized once the uncertainty is known. Upfront fees received from certain contracts are
recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the contract. Card and deposit related fees are recognized in the community
banking segment.
138
Contract Balances
The following table provides information about contract assets, contract liabilities and receivables from contracts with
customers:
(Dollars in thousands)
Contract assets
Contract liabilities
Mortgage broker fees receivable
Administrative services receivable
Wealth management receivable
Card related fees receivable
Total receivables from contracts with customer
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
$
$
$
— $
—
665 $
1,282
64 $
118
13,796
1,190
20
279
9,642
571
$
15,168 $
10,512
Contract liabilities represent upfront fees that the Company received at inception of certain contracts. The revenue recognized
that was included in the contract liability balance at beginning of the period totaled $932,000 and $1.3 million for the years
ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Receivables are recognized in the period the Company provides services
when the Company's right to consideration is unconditional. Card related fee receivable is the result of volume based fee that
the Company receives from a customer on an annual basis in the second quarter of each year. Payment terms on other invoiced
amounts are typically 30 days or less. Contract liabilities and receivables from contracts with customers are included within the
accrued interest payable and other liabilities and accrued interest receivable and other assets line items, respectively, in the
Consolidated Statements of Condition.
Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations
For contracts with an original expected length of more than one year, the following table presents the estimated future timing of
recognition of upfront fees related to card and deposit related fees. These upfront fees represent performance obligations that
are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period.
(Dollars in thousands)
Estimated—2024
Estimated—2025
Total
Practical Expedients and Exemptions
$
$
565
100
665
The Company does not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component if the
Company expects, at contract inception, that the period between when the Company transfers a promised service to a customer
and when the customer pays for that services is one year or less.
The Company recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period
of the asset that the entity otherwise would have recognized is one year or less.
139
(16) Lease Commitments
The following tables provide a summary of lease costs, weighted average remaining lease term and discount rate and future
required fixed payments related to the Company’s leasing arrangements in which it is the lessee:
(In thousands)
Operating lease cost
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use asset
Interest on lease liability
Short-term lease cost
Variable lease cost
Sublease income
Total lease cost
December 31,
2023
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
December 31,
2021
$
22,337 $
22,767 $
22,938
219
290
41
2,391
(70)
219
291
302
2,966
(73)
164
234
321
3,806
(72)
$
25,208 $
26,472 $
27,391
(In thousands)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease
liabilities
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of finance lease
liabilities
Right-of-use asset obtained in exchange for new operating lease
liabilities
Right-of-use asset obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities
Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases
Weighted average remaining lease term - finance leases
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases
Weighted average discount rate - finance leases
(In thousands)
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029 and thereafter
Total minimum future amounts
Impact of measuring the lease liability on a discounted basis
Total lease liability
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
$
23,599
$
25,379
337
14,595
1,408
10.6 years
37.4 years
4.12 %
3.81 %
337
7,832
—
11.4 years
38.0 years
3.99 %
3.43 %
Payments
24,468
23,505
21,478
20,127
18,242
104,806
212,626
(46,303)
166,323
$
$
$
140
In addition to the lessee arrangements discussed above, the Company also leases certain owned premises and receives rental
income from such lessor agreements. Gross rental income related to the Company’s buildings totaled $6.3 million, $7.8 million
and $7.8 million, in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The approximate annual gross rental receipts under noncancelable
agreements with remaining terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2023, are as follows (in thousands):
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029 and thereafter
Total minimum future amounts
(17) Income Taxes
$
$
Receipts
3,507
3,130
2,412
1,724
776
4,091
15,640
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 is summarized as follows:
(In thousands)
Current income taxes:
Federal
State
Foreign
Total current income taxes
Deferred income taxes:
Federal
State
Foreign
Total deferred income taxes
Total income tax expense
2023
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
$
$
$
$
$
165,518 $
62,948
13,696
242,162 $
(8,245) $
(9,750)
(1,712)
(19,707) $
222,455 $
116,976 $
48,633
3,207
168,816 $
18,560 $
(1,183)
4,680
22,057 $
190,873 $
118,723
48,847
6,936
174,506
794
(3,597)
(58)
(2,861)
171,645
The Company’s income before income taxes in 2023, 2022 and 2021 includes $42.5 million, $27.7 million and $23.1 million,
respectively, of foreign income attributable to its Canadian subsidiary.
The tax effects of certain transactions are recorded directly to shareholders’ equity rather than income tax expense. The tax
effect of fair value adjustments on securities available-for-sale and derivative instruments in cash flow hedges are recorded
directly to shareholders’ equity as part of other comprehensive income (loss) and are reflected on the Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income. The tax effect of unrealized gains and losses on certain foreign currency transactions is also
recorded in shareholders’ equity as part of other comprehensive income (loss).
141
A reconciliation of the differences between taxes computed using the statutory Federal income tax rate and actual income tax
expense is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Income tax expense using the statutory Federal income tax rate of
21% on income before taxes
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest, net of interest expense disallowance
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Income earned on bank owned life insurance
Excess tax benefits on share based compensation
Meals, entertainment and related expenses
FDIC insurance expense
Non-deductible compensation expense
Foreign subsidiary, net
Tax benefits related to tax credits, net
Other, net
Income tax expense
$
2023
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
$
177,467 $
147,117 $
133,937
(5,348)
42,027
(1,013)
(2,314)
2,439
7,713
2,147
3,060
(3,632)
(91)
222,455 $
(3,936)
37,328
(102)
(2,278)
1,506
6,014
2,361
2,376
(338)
825
190,873 $
(2,605)
35,747
(1,169)
(1,906)
1,208
5,676
1,799
2,011
(1,145)
(1,908)
171,645
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at
December 31, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Net unrealized losses on securities included in other comprehensive income
Allowance for credit losses
Right-of-use liability
Deferred compensation
Stock-based compensation
FDIC special assessment
Federal net operating loss carryforward
Other
Total gross deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Equipment leasing
Capitalized servicing rights
Right-of-use asset
Premises and equipment
Goodwill and intangible assets
Net unrealized gains on derivatives included in other comprehensive income
Deferred loan fees and costs
Other
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax assets
2023
2022
$
$
126,155 $
113,105
43,693
25,369
13,762
9,092
697
4,930
336,803
165,806
49,857
36,249
35,288
16,019
11,516
7,434
2,652
324,821
11,982 $
140,002
95,389
44,277
26,411
11,196
—
1,003
6,191
324,469
138,198
59,928
36,484
51,058
12,636
2,364
5,061
1,387
307,116
17,353
Management has determined that a valuation allowance is not required for the deferred tax assets at December 31, 2023 because
it is more likely than not that these assets could be realized through future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences,
tax planning strategies and future taxable income. This conclusion is based on the Company’s historical earnings, its current
level of earnings and prospects for continued growth and profitability.
142
The Company has Federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $3.3 million that begin to expire in 2029 through 2037
and are subject to IRC Section 382 annual limitation. The NOL carryforwards were a result of acquisitions.
The Company accounts for uncertainties in income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. At December 31, 2023,
2022, and 2021, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions that, if recognized, would
impact the effective tax rate. If the Company were to record interest or penalties associated with uncertain tax positions, the
interest or penalties would be included in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2023, the Company does not expect the total
amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next 12 months.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in numerous state jurisdictions
and in Canada. In the ordinary course of business, we are routinely subject to audit by the taxing authorities of these
jurisdictions. Currently, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns are open and subject to audit for the 2020 tax return
year forward, and in general, the Company’s state income tax returns are open and subject to audit from the 2020 tax return
year forward, subject to individual state statutes of limitation. The Company has extended the statute of limitations on certain
state income tax returns for tax years 2015 through 2019 due to an ongoing audit. The Company’s Canadian subsidiary’s
Canadian income tax returns are also subject to audit for the 2020 tax return year forward.
(18) Stock Compensation Plans and Other Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Incentive Plan
In May 2022, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2022 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 2022 Plan”) which provides for the
issuance of up to 1,200,000 shares of common stock plus any shares of common stock that were available for awards under the
2015 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 2015 Plan”) as of the effective date of the 2022 Plan. The 2022 Plan replaced the 2015 Plan,
and similarly, the 2015 Plan replaced the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 2007 Plan”) and the 2007 Plan replaced the 1997
Stock Incentive Plan (“the 1997 Plan”). The 2022 Plan, 2015 Plan, 2007 Plan and the 1997 Plan are collectively referred to as
“the Plans.” The 2022 Plan has substantially similar terms to the predecessor plans. Awards granted under the Plans for which
common shares are not issued by reason of cancellation, forfeiture, lapse of such award or settlement of such award in cash, are
again available under the 2022 Plan. All grants made after the approval of the 2022 Plan are made pursuant to the 2022 Plan. As
of December 31, 2023, approximately 1.2 million shares were available for future grants assuming the maximum number of
shares are issued for the performance awards outstanding. The Plans cover substantially all employees of Wintrust. The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers all stock-based compensation programs and authorizes all
awards granted pursuant to the Plans.
The Plans permit the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards,
restricted share or unit awards, performance awards and other incentive awards valued in whole or in part by reference to the
Company’s common stock, all on a stand-alone, combination or tandem basis. The Company historically awarded stock-based
compensation in the form of time-vested non-qualified stock options and time-vested restricted share unit awards (“restricted
shares”). The grants of options provide for the purchase of shares of the Company’s common stock at the fair market value of
the stock on the date the options are granted. Stock options generally vest ratably over periods of three to five years and have a
maximum term of ten years from the date of grant. Restricted shares entitle the holders to receive, at no cost, shares of the
Company’s common stock. Restricted shares generally vest over periods of one to five years from the date of grant.
Beginning in 2011, the Company has awarded annual grants under the Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”), which is
administered under the Plans. The LTIP is designed in part to align the interests of management with interests of shareholders,
foster retention, create a long-term focus based on sustainable results and provide participants a target long-term incentive
opportunity. LTIP grants in 2023, 2022 and 2021 consisted of a combination of performance-based stock awards with a
performance condition metric, performance-based stock awards with a market condition metric and time-vested restricted
shares, and in 2020 consisted of a combination of performance-based stock awards and performance-based cash awards (both
with a performance condition metric) and time vested restricted shares. Performance-based stock and cash awards granted under
the LTIP are contingent upon the achievement of pre-established long-term performance goals set in advance by the
Compensation Committee over a three-year period starting at the beginning of each calendar year. Performance-based stock
awards with a market condition metric are contingent on the total shareholder return performance over a three-year period
relative to the KBW Regional Bank Index. These performance awards are granted at a target level, and based on the Company’s
achievement of the pre-established long-term goals, the actual payouts can range from 0% to a maximum of 150% of the target
award. The awards typically vest in the quarter after the end of the performance period upon certification of the payout by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Holders of performance-based stock awards are entitled to receive, at no
cost, the shares earned based on the achievement of the pre-established long-term goals.
143
Holders of restricted share awards and performance-based stock awards received under the Plans are not entitled to vote or
receive cash dividends (or cash payments equal to the cash dividends) on the underlying common shares until the awards are
vested and shares are issued. Shares that are vested but are not issuable pursuant to deferred compensation arrangements accrue
additional shares based on the value of dividends otherwise paid. Except in limited circumstances, awards granted pursuant to
the Plans are canceled upon termination of employment without any payment of consideration by the Company.
Stock-based compensation is measured as the fair value of an award on the date of grant, and the measured cost is recognized
over the period which the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The fair value of restricted share
and performance-based stock awards with a performance metric is determined based on the average of the high and low trading
prices on the grant date. The fair value of performance stock awards with a market condition metric is determined using a
Monte Carlo simulation model and the fair value of stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
Monte Carlo simulation model and the Black-Scholes option-pricing model require the input of highly subjective assumptions
and are sensitive to changes in the award’s expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock, which can materially
affect the fair value estimates. Management periodically reviews and adjusts the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of
such awards when granted. No options have been granted since 2016.
Stock-based compensation is recognized based on the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest, taking into account
expected forfeitures. In addition, for performance-based awards with a performance metric, an estimate is made of the number
of shares expected to vest as a result of actual performance against the performance criteria in the award to determine the
amount of compensation expense to recognize. The estimate is re-evaluated quarterly and total compensation expense is
adjusted for any change in estimate in the current period.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income was $33.5 million, $31.7 million and
$16.2 million and the related tax benefits were $7.4 million, $7.0 million and $3.7 million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
A summary of the Plans’ stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:
Stock Options
Outstanding at January 1, 2021
Exercised
Forfeited or canceled
Outstanding at December 31, 2021
Exercisable at December 31, 2021
Outstanding at January 1, 2022
Exercised
Forfeited or canceled
Outstanding at December 31, 2022
Exercisable at December 31, 2022
Outstanding at January 1, 2023
Exercised
Forfeited or canceled
Outstanding at December 31, 2023
Exercisable at December 31, 2023
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2023
Common
Shares
Weighted Average
Strike Price
Remaining
Contractual Term
(1)
Intrinsic Value
($000)
(2)
520,663 $
(326,626)
(590)
193,447 $
191,898 $
193,447 $
(123,924)
(1,430)
68,093 $
68,093 $
68,093 $
(54,993)
—
13,100 $
13,100 $
13,100 $
42.47
42.97
46.86
41.62
41.57
41.62
41.89
40.87
41.14
41.14
41.14
40.75
—
42.76
42.76
42.76
1.4
1.3
1.1
1.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
9,518
9,451
2,954
2,954
655
655
655
(1) Represents the weighted average contractual remaining life in years.
(2) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax intrinsic value (i.e., the difference between the Company’s stock price at year end and the option
exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders if they had exercised their options on the last
day of the year. Options with exercise prices above the year end stock price are excluded from the calculation of intrinsic value. The intrinsic value
will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, was $2.5 million,
$6.7 million and $11.7 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises totaled
$540,000, $1.8 million and $3.1 million for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Cash received from option exercises under the
Plans for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $2.2 million, $5.2 million and $14.0 million, respectively.
144
A summary of the Plans’ restricted share activity for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:
Restricted Shares
Outstanding at January 1
Granted
Vested and issued
Forfeited or canceled
Outstanding at end of year
Vested, but deferred, at year end
2023
2022
2021
Common
Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
610,155 $
270,855
(121,534)
(13,353)
746,123 $
98,919 $
73.21
88.06
65.90
83.68
79.60
53.58
Common
Shares
476,813 $
225,680
(68,541)
(23,797)
610,155 $
96,920 $
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
61.33
95.93
64.49
75.84
73.21
53.08
Common
Shares
234,794 $
276,311
(19,673)
(14,619)
476,813 $
95,465 $
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
59.02
63.96
68.92
63.66
61.33
52.52
A summary of the Plans’ performance-based stock award activity, based on the target level of the awards, for the years ended
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:
Performance Shares
Outstanding at January 1
Granted
Added by performance factor at vesting
Vested and issued
Forfeited or canceled
Outstanding at end of year
Vested, but deferred, at year end
2023
2022
2021
Common
Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
545,379 $
189,355
23,925
(186,344)
(19,289)
553,026 $
29,020 $
70.30
92.36
62.82
62.67
81.84
79.69
45.88
Common
Shares
557,255 $
160,598
—
—
(172,474)
545,379 $
35,696 $
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
62.94
97.14
—
—
71.52
70.30
44.38
Common
Shares
482,608 $
208,851
—
—
(134,204)
557,255 $
35,160 $
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
71.15
58.99
—
—
86.30
62.94
43.69
At December 31, 2023, the maximum number of performance-based shares that could be issued on outstanding awards if
performance is attained at the maximum amount was approximately 815,000 shares.
The actual tax benefit realized upon the vesting and issuance of restricted shares and performance-based stock is based on the
fair value of the shares on the issue date, and the estimated tax benefit of the awards is based on fair value of the awards on the
grant date. The actual tax benefit realized upon the vesting and issuance of restricted shares and performance-based stock in
2023 was $1.8 million more than the expected tax benefit for those shares; in 2022 the actual tax benefit was $580,000 more
than the expected tax benefit for those shares and in 2021 the actual tax benefit was $40,000 more than the expected tax benefit
for those shares. These differences in actual and expected tax benefits were recorded to income tax expense.
As of December 31, 2023, there was $38.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share based
arrangements under the Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two
years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $22.1 million, $4.5
million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The Company issues new shares to satisfy its obligation to issue shares granted pursuant to the Plans.
Cash Incentive and Retention Plan
The Cash Incentive and Retention Plan (“CIRP”) allows the Company to provide cash compensation to the Company’s and its
subsidiaries’ officers and employees. The CIRP is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
CIRP generally provides for the grants of cash awards, which may be earned pursuant to the achievement of performance
criteria established by the Compensation Committee and/or continued employment. The performance criteria, if any,
established by the Compensation Committee must relate to one or more of the criteria specified in the CIRP, which includes:
earnings, earnings growth, revenues, stock price, return on assets, return on equity, improvement of financial ratings,
achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives and expenses. These criteria may relate to the Company, a
particular line of business or a specific subsidiary of the Company. The Company had no expense related to the CIRP in 2023,
2022 and 2021, and no awards were paid in those years. There were no outstanding awards under this plan at December 31,
2023.
145
Other Employee Benefits
Wintrust and its subsidiaries also provide 401(k) Retirement Savings Plans (“401(k) Plans”). The 401(k) Plans cover all
employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. Contributions by employees are made through salary deferrals at their
direction, subject to certain Plan and statutory limitations. Employer contributions to the 401(k) Plans are made at the
employer’s discretion. Eligible participants that have contributed to the 401(k) Plans are eligible to share in an allocation of
employer contributions. The Company’s expense for the employer contributions to the 401(k) Plans was approximately $19.2
million in 2023, $16.2 million in 2022, and $15.6 million in 2021.
The Wintrust Financial Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) is designed to encourage greater stock ownership
among employees, thereby enhancing employee commitment to the Company. The ESPP gives eligible employees the right to
accumulate funds over an offering period to purchase shares of common stock. All shares offered under the ESPP will be either
newly issued shares of the Company or shares issued from treasury, if any. In accordance with the ESPP, beginning January 1,
2015, the purchase price of the shares of common stock is equal to 95% of the closing price of the Company’s common stock
on the last day of the offering period. During 2023, 2022 and 2021, 46,034, 40,421 and 44,021, shares of common stock,
respectively, were purchased by participants and no compensation expense was recorded. The Company plans to continue to
offer common stock through this ESPP on an ongoing basis and, in 2021, increased the shares authorized under the ESPP by
200,000 shares. At December 31, 2023, the Company had an obligation to issue 8,410 shares of common stock to participants
and had 166,438 shares available for future grants under the ESPP.
The Company does not currently offer other postretirement benefits such as health care or other pension plans.
Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan
The Wintrust Financial Corporation Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan (“DDFS Plan”) allows directors of the Company
and its subsidiaries to choose to receive payment of directors’ fees in either cash or common stock of the Company and to defer
the receipt of the fees. The DDFS Plan is designed to encourage stock ownership by directors. All shares offered under the
DDFS Plan will be either newly issued shares of the Company or shares issued from treasury. The number of shares issued is
determined on a quarterly basis based on the fees earned during the quarter and the fair market value per share of the common
stock on the last trading day of the preceding quarter. The shares are issued annually and the directors are entitled to dividends
and voting rights upon the issuance of the shares. During 2020, an additional 200,000 shares were authorized under the DDFS
Plan. During 2023, 2022 and 2021, a total of 63,001 shares, 59,174 shares and 23,909 shares, respectively, were issued to
directors. For those directors that elect to defer the receipt of the common stock, the Company maintains records of stock units
representing an obligation to issue shares of common stock. The number of stock units equals the number of shares that would
have been issued had the director not elected to defer receipt of the shares. Additional stock units are credited at the time
dividends are paid, however no voting rights are associated with the stock units. The shares of common stock represented by the
stock units are issued in the year specified by the directors in their participation agreements. At December 31, 2023, the
Company has an obligation to issue 286,663 shares of common stock to directors and has 84,864 shares available for future
grants under the DDFS Plan.
(19) Regulatory Matters
Banking laws place restrictions upon the amount of dividends that can be paid to Wintrust by the banks. Based on these laws,
the banks could, subject to minimum capital requirements, declare dividends to Wintrust without obtaining regulatory approval
in an amount not exceeding (a) undivided profits, and (b) the amount of net income reduced by dividends paid for the current
and prior two years. During 2023, 2022 and 2021, cash dividends totaling $360.0 million, $52.0 million and $145.0 million,
respectively, were paid to Wintrust by the banks and other subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2023, the banks had approximately
$941.2 million available to be paid as dividends to Wintrust without prior regulatory approval and without reducing their capital
below the well-capitalized level.
The Company and the banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements established by the federal banking agencies
that take into account risk attributable to balance sheet and off-balance sheet activities. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory — and possibly discretionary — actions by regulators, that if undertaken could
have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices.
146
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the banks to maintain
minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and
Tier 1 leverage capital (as defined) to average quarterly assets (as defined). The Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines require
bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, of which at
least 4.50% must be in the form of Common Equity Tier 1 capital and 6.0% must be in the form of Tier 1 capital. The Federal
Reserve also requires a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total assets of 4.0%. In addition, the Federal
Reserve continues to consider the Tier 1 leverage ratio in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities.
As reflected in the following table, the Company met all minimum capital requirements at December 31, 2023 and 2022:
Total capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
2023
2022
12.1 %
10.3
9.4
9.3
11.9 %
10.0
9.1
8.8
Wintrust is designated as a financial holding company. Bank holding companies approved as financial holding companies may
engage in an expanded range of activities, including the businesses conducted by its wealth management subsidiaries. As a
financial holding company, Wintrust’s banks are required to maintain their capital positions at the “well-capitalized” level. As
of December 31, 2023, the banks were categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action. The ratios required for the banks to be “well capitalized” by regulatory definition are 10.0%, 8.0%, 6.5% and 5.0% for
total capital to risk-weighted assets, Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
and Tier 1 leverage ratio, respectively.
147
The banks’ actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 are presented in the following table:
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
Actual
Ratio
To Be Well
Capitalized by
Regulatory Definition
Amount
Ratio
Actual
Amount
Ratio
To Be Well
Capitalized by
Regulatory Definition
Amount
Ratio
Amount
$ 852,471
478,606
1,115,527
272,241
431,663
181,916
474,973
203,127
278,437
239,374
352,266
317,491
197,243
240,694
250,964
(Dollars in thousands)
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Lake Forest Bank
Hinsdale Bank
Wintrust Bank
Libertyville Bank
Barrington Bank
Crystal Lake Bank
Northbrook Bank
Schaumburg Bank
Village Bank
Beverly Bank
Town Bank
Wheaton Bank
State Bank of the Lakes
Old Plank Trail Bank
St. Charles Bank
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Lake Forest Bank
Hinsdale Bank
Wintrust Bank
Libertyville Bank
Barrington Bank
Crystal Lake Bank
Northbrook Bank
Schaumburg Bank
Village Bank
Beverly Bank
Town Bank
Wheaton Bank
State Bank of the Lakes
Old Plank Trail Bank
St. Charles Bank
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Lake Forest Bank
Hinsdale Bank
Wintrust Bank
Libertyville Bank
Barrington Bank
Crystal Lake Bank
Northbrook Bank
Schaumburg Bank
Village Bank
Beverly Bank
Town Bank
Wheaton Bank
State Bank of the Lakes
Old Plank Trail Bank
St. Charles Bank
$ 804,011
447,075
1,009,631
253,576
416,070
170,670
441,563
190,280
255,649
221,548
334,086
296,134
189,197
227,759
233,651
$ 804,011
447,075
1,009,631
253,576
416,070
170,670
441,563
190,280
255,649
221,548
334,086
296,134
189,197
227,759
233,651
12.5 % $ 683,460
407,428
11.8
938,320
11.9
221,509
12.3
372,989
11.6
143,786
12.7
385,619
12.3
179,670
11.3
233,112
11.9
207,604
11.5
301,424
11.7
275,018
11.5
165,218
11.9
212,258
11.3
218,403
11.5
11.8 % $ 546,768
325,943
11.0
750,656
10.8
177,207
11.5
298,392
11.2
115,029
11.9
308,496
11.5
143,736
10.6
186,489
11.0
166,083
10.7
241,139
11.1
220,014
10.8
132,174
11.5
169,806
10.7
174,722
10.7
11.8 % $ 444,249
264,828
11.0
609,908
10.8
143,981
11.5
242,443
11.2
93,461
11.9
250,653
11.5
116,786
10.6
151,523
11.0
134,942
10.7
195,926
11.1
178,762
10.8
107,392
11.5
137,968
10.7
141,962
10.7
10.0 % $ 725,384
441,317
10.0
1,084,435
10.0
242,482
10.0
387,113
10.0
154,891
10.0
409,571
10.0
169,428
10.0
256,537
10.0
223,808
10.0
314,351
10.0
285,606
10.0
167,023
10.0
211,437
10.0
211,132
10.0
8.0 % $ 689,320
416,762
8.0
1,004,271
8.0
225,766
8.0
373,830
8.0
145,514
8.0
383,691
8.0
160,061
8.0
238,246
8.0
206,714
8.0
297,499
8.0
269,366
8.0
159,399
8.0
201,864
8.0
200,910
8.0
6.5 % $ 689,320
416,762
6.5
1,004,271
6.5
225,766
6.5
373,830
6.5
145,514
6.5
383,691
6.5
160,061
6.5
238,246
6.5
206,714
6.5
297,499
6.5
269,366
6.5
159,399
6.5
201,864
6.5
200,910
6.5
11.4 % $ 638,871
378,007
11.7
907,101
12.0
201,695
12.0
337,499
11.5
136,419
11.4
362,342
11.3
149,425
11.3
226,399
11.3
195,237
11.5
278,704
11.3
247,015
11.6
147,369
11.3
183,269
11.5
186,623
11.3
10.8 % $ 511,097
302,406
11.0
725,681
11.1
161,356
11.2
269,999
11.1
109,135
10.7
289,874
10.6
119,540
10.7
181,120
10.5
156,189
10.6
222,963
10.7
197,612
10.9
117,895
10.8
146,615
11.0
149,299
10.8
10.8 % $ 415,266
245,705
11.0
589,616
11.1
131,102
11.2
219,374
11.1
88,673
10.7
235,522
10.6
97,126
10.7
147,160
10.5
126,904
10.6
181,157
10.7
160,559
10.9
95,790
10.8
119,125
11.0
121,305
10.8
10.0 %
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
8.0 %
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
6.5 %
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
148
(Dollars in thousands)
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio:
Lake Forest Bank
Hinsdale Bank
Wintrust Bank
Libertyville Bank
Barrington Bank
Crystal Lake Bank
Northbrook Bank
Schaumburg Bank
Village Bank
Beverly Bank
Town Bank
Wheaton Bank
State Bank of the Lakes
Old Plank Trail Bank
St. Charles Bank
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
Actual
Amount
Ratio
To Be Well
Capitalized by
Regulatory Definition
Amount
Ratio
Actual
Amount
Ratio
To Be Well
Capitalized by
Regulatory Definition
Amount
Ratio
$ 804,011
447,075
1,009,631
253,576
416,070
170,670
441,563
190,280
255,649
221,548
334,086
296,134
189,197
227,759
233,651
9.9 % $ 404,942
238,724
9.4
467,712
10.8
130,396
9.7
192,589
10.8
85,280
10.0
222,668
9.9
101,620
9.4
129,995
9.8
110,741
10.0
183,077
9.1
157,056
9.4
95,551
9.9
127,250
9.0
122,638
9.5
5.0 % $ 689,320
416,762
5.0
1,004,271
5.0
225,766
5.0
373,830
5.0
145,514
5.0
383,691
5.0
160,061
5.0
238,246
5.0
206,714
5.0
297,499
5.0
269,366
5.0
159,399
5.0
201,864
5.0
200,910
5.0
8.8 % $ 391,452
220,373
9.5
469,415
10.7
121,475
9.3
181,212
10.3
76,780
9.5
211,521
9.1
86,409
9.3
123,484
9.7
103,759
10.0
176,660
8.4
148,942
9.0
88,065
9.1
115,692
8.7
104,431
9.6
5.0 %
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Wintrust’s mortgage banking division and broker/dealer subsidiary are also required to maintain minimum net worth capital
requirements with various governmental agencies. The mortgage banking division’s net worth requirements are governed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development and the broker/dealer’s net worth requirements are governed by the SEC. As
of December 31, 2023, these business units met their minimum net worth capital requirements.
(20) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has outstanding, at any time, a number of commitments to extend credit. These commitments include revolving
home equity line and other credit agreements, term loan commitments and standby and commercial letters of credit. Standby
and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third
party. Standby letters of credit are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the
underlying contract with the third party, while commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and
typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and
the third party.
These commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in
the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon,
the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company uses the same credit
policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Commitments to extend commercial, commercial
real estate and construction loans totaled $10.5 billion and $9.5 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and
unused home equity lines totaled $845.6 million and $796.9 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Standby
and commercial letters of credit totaled $389.5 million at December 31, 2023 and $344.4 million at December 31, 2022.
In addition, at December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had approximately $222.8 million and $181.0 million, respectively,
in commitments to fund residential mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market. These lending commitments are also
considered derivative instruments. The Company also enters into forward contracts for the future delivery of residential
mortgage loans at specified interest rates to reduce the interest rate risk associated with commitments to fund loans as well as
mortgage loans held-for-sale. These forward contracts are also considered derivative instruments and had contractual amounts
of approximately $626.9 million at December 31, 2023 and $321.0 million at December 31, 2022. See Note (21) “Derivative
Financial Instruments” in Item 8 of this report for further discussion on derivative instruments.
The Company enters into residential mortgage loan sale agreements with investors in the normal course of business. These
agreements usually require certain representations concerning credit information, loan documentation, collateral and
insurability. On occasion, investors have requested the Company to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to
repurchase loans which the investors believe do not comply with applicable representations. Management maintains a liability
for estimated losses on loans expected to be repurchased or on which indemnification is expected to be provided and regularly
149
evaluates the adequacy of this recourse liability based on trends in repurchase and indemnification requests, actual loss
experience, known and inherent risks in the loans, and current economic conditions.
The Company sold approximately $2.0 billion of mortgage loans in 2023 and $3.1 billion in 2022. The liability for estimated
losses on repurchase and indemnification claims for residential mortgage loans previously sold to investors was approximately
$152,000 and $624,000 at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and was included in other liabilities on the Consolidated
Statements of Condition. Losses charged against the liability were $96,000 in 2023 as compared to $60,000 in 2022. These
losses relate to mortgages which experienced early payment and other defaults meeting certain representation and warranty
recourse requirements.
The Company had unfunded commitments to investment partnerships that qualify for CRA purposes totaling $54.0 million and
$50.9 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Of these commitments, $36.2 million and $7.1 million related to
legally-binding unfunded commitments for tax-credit investments and were included within other liabilities on the Consolidated
Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The Company utilizes an out-sourced securities clearing platform and has agreed to indemnify the clearing broker of Wintrust
Investments for losses that it may sustain from the customer accounts introduced by Wintrust Investments. As of December 31,
2023 and 2022, the total amount of customer balances maintained by the clearing broker and subject to indemnification was
approximately $9.0 million and $15.8 million, respectively. Wintrust Investments seeks to control the risks associated with its
customers’ activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal
guidelines.
Litigation Matters
In accordance with applicable accounting principles, the Company establishes an accrued liability for litigation and threatened
litigation actions and proceedings when those actions present loss contingencies, which are both probable and estimable. In
actions for which a loss is reasonably possible in future periods, the Company determines whether it can estimate a loss or
range of possible loss. To determine whether a possible loss is estimable, the Company reviews and evaluates its material
litigation on an ongoing basis, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, in light of potentially relevant
factual and legal developments. This review may include information learned through the discovery process, rulings on
substantive or dispositive motions, and settlement discussions.
Wintrust Mortgage California PAGA Matter
On May 24, 2022, a former Wintrust Mortgage employee filed a California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) suit, not
individually, but as representative of all Wintrust Mortgage’s California hourly employees, against Wintrust Mortgage in the
Superior Court of San Diego County, California. Plaintiff alleges Wintrust Mortgage failed to provide: (i) accurate sick leave
accrual and pay; (ii) overtime wages; (iii) accurately itemized wage statements; (iv) meal breaks and meal premiums; (v) timely
payment of earned wages; (vi) payment of all earned wages; and (vii) payment of all vested vacation hours. Wintrust Mortgage
disputes the validity of Plaintiff’s claims and believes, to the extent there were defects in complying with California law
governing the payment of compensation to Plaintiff, such errors would have been de minimis. Plaintiff also has an arbitration
agreement with a collective and class action waiver and on January 19, 2023, Wintrust Mortgage moved to compel arbitration.
The court has stayed litigation pending mediation, which will occur on May 13, 2024. We dispute plaintiff’s allegations and
otherwise lack sufficient information to estimate the amount of any potential liability. We plan to vigorously defend ourselves
against the claims brought by the plaintiff in this matter.
Wintrust Mortgage Fair Lending Matter
On May 25, 2022, a Wintrust Mortgage customer filed a putative class action and asserted individual claims against Wintrust
Mortgage and Wintrust Financial Corporation in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Plaintiff alleges that
Wintrust Mortgage discriminated against black/African American borrowers and brings class claims under the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, Sections 1981 and 1982 under Chapter 42 of the United States Code; and the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
Plaintiff also asserts individual claims under theories of promissory estoppel, fraudulent inducement, and breach of contract. On
September 23, 2022, Wintrust filed a motion to dismiss the entire suit and the court granted that motion to dismiss on
September 27, 2023, giving Plaintiff until October 20, 2023 to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff timely filed an amended
complaint. On November 21, 2023, Wintrust filed its motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Wintrust vigorously disputes
these allegations, and Wintrust otherwise lacks sufficient information to estimate the amount of any potential liability.
150
Wintrust Financial ERISA Matter
On July 29, 2022, a former Wintrust employee filed a class action in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
asserting claims under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) against Wintrust Financial
Corporation. Plaintiff alleges Wintrust breached its fiduciary duty in the selection of BlackRock Target Date funds for inclusion
in its 401(k) plan, that Wintrust failed to monitor the performance of those funds, and in the alternative, Wintrust should be
liable for breach of trust. Plaintiff’s sole basis for the allegations is that BlackRock Target Date funds allegedly performed
more poorly than two comparable funds over a three-year period. Wintrust is one of several public companies that were sued on
identical grounds within the same week by the same plaintiff’s law firm. On November 8, 2022, Wintrust filed a motion to
dismiss the entire complaint. On July 14, 2023, the District Court granted Wintrust’s motion to dismiss and gave Plaintiff until
August 2, 2023 to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint which Wintrust moved to dismiss on
September 14, 2023. Wintrust vigorously disputes plaintiff’s allegations, and otherwise lacks sufficient information to estimate
the amount of any potential liability.
Other Matters
In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries, from time to time, are subject to pending and threatened legal action and
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
Based on information currently available and upon consultation with counsel, management believes that the eventual outcome
of any pending or threatened legal actions and proceedings described above, including our ordinary course litigation, will not
have a material adverse effect on the operations or financial condition of the Company. However, it is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the results of operations or financial condition for a particular
period.
(21) Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company primarily enters into derivative financial instruments as part of its strategy to manage its exposure to changes in
interest rates. Derivative instruments represent contracts between parties that result in one party delivering cash to the other
party based on a notional amount and an underlying term (such as a rate, security price or price index or commodity price) as
specified in the contract. The amount of cash delivered from one party to the other is determined based on the interaction of the
notional amount of the contract with the underlying term. Derivatives are also implicit in certain contracts and commitments.
The derivative financial instruments currently used by the Company to manage its exposure to interest rate risk include:
(1) interest rate swaps and collars to manage the interest rate risk of certain fixed and variable rate assets and variable rate
liabilities; (2) interest rate lock commitments provided to customers to fund certain mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary
market; (3) forward commitments for the future delivery of such mortgage loans to protect the Company from adverse changes
in interest rates and corresponding changes in the value of mortgage loans held-for-sale; (4) covered call options to
economically hedge specific investment securities and receive fee income, effectively enhancing the overall yield on such
securities to compensate for net interest margin compression; and (5) options and swaps to economically hedge a portion of the
fair value adjustments related to the Company’s mortgage servicing rights portfolio. The Company also enters into derivatives
(typically interest rate swaps and commodity forward contracts) with certain qualified borrowers to facilitate the borrowers’ risk
management strategies and concurrently enters into mirror-image derivatives with a third party counterparty, effectively making
a market in the derivatives for such borrowers. Additionally, the Company enters into foreign currency contracts to manage
foreign exchange risk associated with certain foreign currency denominated assets.
The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments in the consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the
purpose or intent for holding the instrument. The Company records derivative assets and derivative liabilities on the
Consolidated Statements of Condition within accrued interest receivable and other assets and accrued interest payable and other
liabilities, respectively. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized in income or in
shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss depending on whether the derivative
financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting and, if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge.
Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income in the same period and in the
same income statement line as changes in the fair values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair
values of derivative financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss, net of deferred taxes, and reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Changes in fair values of derivative financial instruments not designated in a hedging relationship pursuant to ASC 815 are
reported in non-interest income during the period of the change. Derivative financial instruments are valued by a third party and
151
are corroborated by comparison with valuations provided by the respective counterparties. Fair values of certain mortgage
banking derivatives (interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments to sell mortgage loans) are estimated based on
changes in mortgage interest rates from the date of the loan commitment. The fair value of foreign currency derivatives is
computed based on changes in foreign currency rates stated in the contract compared to those prevailing at the measurement
date. Commodity derivative fair values are computed based on changes in the price per unit stated in the contract compared to
those prevailing at the measurement date.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2023 and
December 31, 2022:
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate derivatives designated as Cash Flow Hedges
Interest rate derivatives designated as Fair Value Hedges
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate derivatives
Interest rate lock commitments
Forward commitments to sell mortgage loans
Commodity forward contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Derivative Assets
Derivative Liabilities
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
$
$
40,116 $
— $
44,456 $
58,198
12,349
16,768
273
—
52,465 $
16,768 $
44,729 $
58,198
$
211,490 $
269,670 $
210,397 $
271,109
4,511
—
888
6,372
1,711
220
257
8,222
—
5,212
609
6,308
58
414
162
8,137
279,880
338,078
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
Total Derivatives
$
$
223,261 $
280,080 $
222,526 $
275,726 $
296,848 $
267,255 $
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to net interest income and to manage its
exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and
interest rate collars as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts to or from a counterparty in exchange for the Company receiving or paying fixed-
rate payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate collars
designated as cash flow hedges involve the settlement of amounts in which the interest rate specified in the contract exceeds the
agreed upon cap strike price or in which the interest rate specified in the contract is below the agreed upon floor strike price at
the end of each period.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had various interest rate collar and swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of
variable rate loans. When the relationship between the hedged item and hedging instrument is highly effective at achieving
offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the hedged risk, changes in the fair value of these cash flow hedges are recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss and are subsequently reclassified to interest income as interest payments
are made on such variable rate loans. The changes in fair value (net of tax) are separately disclosed in the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income.
152
The table below provides details on these cash flow hedges, summarized by derivative type and maturity, as of December 31,
2023:
(In thousands)
Interest Rate Collars at 1-month CME term SOFR:
Buy 2.250% floor, sell 3.743% cap; matures September 2025
Buy 2.750% floor, sell 4.320% cap; matures October 2026
Buy 2.000% floor, sell 3.450% cap; matures September 2027
Interest Rate Swaps at 1-month CME term SOFR:
Fixed 3.748%; matures December 2025
Fixed 3.759%; matures December 2025
Fixed 3.680%; matures February 2026
Fixed 4.176%; matures March 2026
Fixed 3.915%; matures March 2026
Fixed 4.450%; matures July 2026
Fixed 3.512%, matures December 2026
Fixed 3.515%; matures December 2026
Fixed 3.453%; matures February 2027
Fixed 4.150%; matures July 2027
Fixed 3.748%; matures March 2028
Fixed 3.526%; matures March 2028
Fixed 3.993%; matures October 2029
Fixed 3.993%; matures October 2029
Fixed 4.245%; matures November 2029
Fixed 4.245%; matures November 2029
Total Cash Flow Hedges
December 31, 2023
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Asset (Liability)
$ 1,250,000 $
500,000
1,250,000
(13,498)
(395)
(23,415)
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
100,000
250,000
175,000
175,000
$ 6,700,000 $
(945)
(894)
(1,493)
1,211
(150)
3,750
(951)
(930)
(1,678)
4,436
2,054
(108)
3,496
8,740
8,215
8,215
(4,340)
In the first quarter of 2022, the Company terminated interest rate swap derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges of
variable rate deposits with a total notional value of $1.0 billion and a five-year term effective July 2022. At the time of
termination, the fair value of the derivative contracts totaled an asset of $66.5 million, with such adjustments to fair value
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. In the second quarter of 2022, the Company terminated two
additional interest rate swap derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges of variable rate deposits with a total notional
value of $500.0 million each effective since April 2020. The remaining terms of such derivative contracts were through March
2023 and April 2024 and, at the time of termination, the fair value of the derivative contracts totaled assets of $3.7 million and
$10.7 million, respectively, with such adjustments to fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. In
the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company terminated one additional interest rate collar derivative contract designated as a cash
flow hedge of the Term Facility with a total notional value of $64.3 million effective since September 2018. The remaining
term of such derivative contract was through September 2023 and, at the time of termination, the fair value of the derivative
contract totaled an asset of $875,000, with such adjustments to fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
or loss.
For all such terminations, as the hedged forecasted transactions (interest payments on variable rate deposits and the Term
Facility) are still expected to occur over the remaining term of such terminated derivatives, such adjustments will remain in
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss and be reclassified as a reduction to interest expense on a straight-line basis
over the original term of the terminated derivative contracts.
153
A rollforward of the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss related to interest rate derivatives designated
as cash flow hedges, including such derivative contracts terminated during the period, follows:
(In thousands)
Unrealized gain at beginning of period
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss to
interest income or expense on deposits, loans and other borrowings
Amount of loss recognized in other comprehensive income or loss
Unrealized gain at end of period
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2023
10,026 $
36,908
55,846
(22,334)
43,538 $
(3,319)
(23,563)
10,026
$
$
As of December 31, 2023, the Company estimated that during the next 12 months, $57.9 million will be reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss as a decrease to net interest income. Such estimate consists of $14.6 million
reclassified as a reduction to interest expense on the terminated cash flow hedges discussed above and $72.5 million reclassified
as a reduction to interest income related to the interest rate collars and swaps noted above that remain outstanding.
Fair Value Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges involve the payment of fixed amounts to a counterparty in exchange for the
Company receiving variable payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had 14 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $218.4 million that
were designated as fair value hedges primarily associated with fixed rate commercial and industrial and commercial real estate
loans as well as life insurance premium finance receivables.
For derivatives designated and that qualify as fair value hedges, the net gain or loss from the entire change in the fair value of
the derivative instrument is recognized in the same income statement line item as the earnings effect, including the net gain or
loss, of the hedged item (interest income earned on fixed rate loans) when the hedged item affects earnings.
The following table presents the carrying amount of the hedged assets/(liabilities) and the cumulative amount of fair value
hedging adjustment included in the carrying amount of the hedged assets/(liabilities) that are designated as a fair value hedge
accounting relationship as of December 31, 2023:
(In thousands)
Derivatives in
Fair Value
Hedging
Relationships
Interest rate
swaps
Location in the Statement of Condition
Loans, net of unearned income
Carrying Amount of the
Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)
December 31, 2023
Cumulative Amount of Fair
Value Hedging Adjustment
Included in the Carrying
Amount of the Hedged
Assets/(Liabilities)
Cumulative Amount of Fair
Value Hedging Adjustment
Remaining for any Hedged
Assets/(Liabilities) for which
Hedge Accounting has been
Discontinued
Available-for-sale debt securities
758
$
207,137 $
(12,143) $
(14)
(81)
—
The following table presents the gain or loss recognized related to derivative instruments that are designated as fair value
hedges for the respective period:
(In thousands)
Derivatives in Fair Value
Hedging Relationships
Interest rate swaps
Non-Designated Hedges
Year Ended
December 31,
Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
2023
Interest and fees on loans
$
Interest income - investment securities
12
—
The Company does not use derivatives for speculative purposes. Derivatives not designated as accounting hedges are used to
manage the Company’s economic exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict
154
hedge accounting requirements of ASC 815. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are
recorded directly in earnings.
Interest Rate Derivatives—Periodically, the Company may purchase interest rate cap derivatives designed to act as an economic
hedge of the risk of the negative impact on its fixed-rate loan portfolios from rising interest rates. As of December 31, 2023,
there were no interest rate caps outstanding that were designed to act as an economic hedge. During 2022, the Company
terminated an interest rate cap derivative contract related to LIBOR that was not designated as an accounting hedge with a total
notional value of $1.0 billion.
Additionally, the Company has interest rate derivatives, including swaps and option products, resulting from a service the
Company provides to certain qualified borrowers. The Company’s banking subsidiaries execute certain derivative products
(typically interest rate swaps) directly with qualified commercial borrowers to facilitate their respective risk management
strategies. For example, these arrangements allow the Company’s commercial borrowers to effectively convert a variable rate
loan to a fixed rate. In order to minimize the Company’s exposure on these transactions, the Company simultaneously executes
offsetting derivatives with third parties. In most cases, the offsetting derivatives have mirror-image terms, which result in the
positions’ changes in fair value substantially offsetting through earnings each period. However, to the extent that the derivatives
are not a mirror-image and because of differences in counterparty credit risk, changes in fair value will not completely offset
resulting in some earnings impact each period. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in other non-interest
income. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had interest rate derivative transactions with an aggregate notional
amount of approximately $11.4 billion and $9.6 billion, respectively, (all interest rate swaps and caps with customers and third
parties) related to this program. At December 31, 2023, these interest rate derivatives had maturity dates ranging from January
2024 to January 2037.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives—These derivatives include interest rate lock commitments provided to customers to fund certain
mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of such loans. It is the
Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of a portion of our residential mortgage loan
production when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of future changes in
interest rates on its commitments to fund the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans held-for-sale. The Company’s
mortgage banking derivatives have not been designated as being in hedge relationships. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the
Company had interest rate lock commitments with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $129.9 million and $121.6
million and forward commitments to sell mortgage loans with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $626.9 million
and $321.0 million. The fair values of these derivatives were estimated based on changes in mortgage rates from the dates of the
commitments. Changes in the fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives are included in mortgage banking revenue.
Commodity Derivatives—The Company has commodity forward contracts resulting from a service the Company provides to
certain qualified borrowers. The Company’s banking subsidiaries execute certain derivative products directly with qualified
commercial borrowers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. For example, these arrangements allow the
Company’s commercial borrowers to effectively purchase or sell a given commodity at an agreed-upon price on an agreed-upon
settlement date. In order to minimize the Company’s exposure on these transactions, the Company simultaneously executes
offsetting derivatives with third parties. In most cases, the offsetting derivatives have mirror-image terms, which result in the
positions’ changes in fair value substantially offsetting through earnings each period. However, to the extent that the derivatives
are not a mirror-image and because of differences in counterparty credit risk, changes in fair value will not completely offset
resulting in some earnings impact each period. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in other non-interest
income. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had commodity derivative transactions with an aggregate notional
amount of approximately $8.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively, (all forward contracts with customers and third parties)
related to this program. At December 31, 2023, these commodity derivatives had maturity dates ranging from June 2024 to
October 2024.
Foreign Currency Derivatives—The Company has foreign currency derivative contracts resulting from a service the Company
provides to certain qualified customers. The Company’s banking subsidiaries execute certain derivative products directly with
qualified customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies related to foreign currency fluctuations. For
example, these arrangements allow the Company’s customers to effectively exchange the currency of one country for the
currency of another country at an agreed-upon price on an agreed-upon settlement date. In order to minimize the Company’s
exposure on these transactions, the Company simultaneously executes offsetting derivatives with third parties. In most cases,
the offsetting derivatives have mirror-image terms, which result in the positions’ changes in fair value substantially offsetting
through earnings each period. However, to the extent that the derivatives are not a mirror-image and because of differences in
counterparty credit risk, changes in fair value will not completely offset resulting in some earnings impact each period. Changes
in the fair value of these derivatives are included in other non-interest income. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the
155
Company held foreign currency derivatives with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $144.3 million and $226.2
million, respectively.
Other Derivatives—Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain securities
held within the banks’ investment portfolios (covered call options). These option transactions are designed to increase the total
return associated with the investment securities portfolio. These options do not qualify as accounting hedges pursuant to ASC
815 and, accordingly, changes in fair value of these contracts are recognized as other non-interest income. There were no
covered call options outstanding as of December 31, 2023 or December 31, 2022.
Periodically, the Company will purchase options for the right to purchase securities not currently held within the banks’
investment portfolios or enter into interest rate swaps in which the Company elects to not designate such derivatives as hedging
instruments. These option and swap transactions are designed primarily to economically hedge a portion of the fair value
adjustments related to the Company’s mortgage servicing rights portfolio. The gain or loss associated with these derivative
contracts are included in mortgage banking revenue. The Company held four interest rate derivatives with an aggregate notional
value of $195.0 million at December 31, 2023 and three interest rate derivatives with an aggregate notional value of $190.0
million for such purpose of economically hedging a portion of the fair value adjustment related to its mortgage servicing rights
portfolio.
Amounts included in the Consolidated Statements of Income related to derivative instruments not designated in hedge
relationships were as follows:
(In thousands)
Derivative
Interest rate swaps and caps
Mortgage banking derivatives
Commodity contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Covered call options
Derivative contract held as economic hedge on MSRs Mortgage banking revenue
Location in income statement
Trading gains (losses), net
Mortgage banking revenue
Trading gains (losses), net
Trading gains (losses), net
Fees from covered call options
Years Ended
December 31,
2023
2022
$
765 $
12,285
279
—
21,863
1,280
3,603
(23,470)
95
85
14,133
(2,165)
Credit Risk
Derivative instruments have inherent risks, primarily market risk and credit risk. Market risk is associated with changes in
interest rates and credit risk relates to the risk that the counterparty will fail to perform according to the terms of the agreement.
The amounts potentially subject to market and credit risks are the streams of interest payments under the contracts and the
market value of the derivative instrument and not the notional principal amounts used to express the volume of the transactions.
Market and credit risks are managed and monitored as part of the Company’s overall asset-liability management process, except
that the credit risk related to derivatives entered into with certain qualified borrowers is managed through the Company’s
standard loan underwriting process since these derivatives are secured through collateral provided by the loan agreements.
Actual exposures are monitored against various types of credit limits established to contain risk within parameters. When
deemed necessary, appropriate types and amounts of collateral are obtained to minimize credit exposure.
The Company has agreements with certain of its interest rate derivative counterparties that contain cross-default provisions,
which provide that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness
has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The
Company also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision allowing the counterparty to
terminate the derivative positions if the Company fails to maintain its status as a well or adequately capitalized institution,
which would require the Company to settle its obligations under the agreements. As of December 31, 2023, there were no
interest rate derivatives in a net liability position that were subject to such agreements. The fair value of such derivatives
includes accrued interest related to these agreements.
The Company is also exposed to the credit risk of its commercial borrowers who are counterparties to interest rate derivatives
with the banks. This counterparty risk related to the commercial borrowers is managed and monitored through the banks’
standard underwriting process applicable to loans since these derivatives are secured through collateral provided by the loan
agreement. The counterparty risk associated with the mirror-image swaps executed with third parties is monitored and managed
in connection with the Company’s overall asset liability management process.
156
The Company records interest rate derivatives subject to master netting agreements at their gross value and does not offset
derivative assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The table below summarizes the Company’s
interest rate derivatives and offsetting positions as of the dates shown.
(In thousands)
Gross Amounts Recognized
Less: Amounts offset in the Statements of Condition
Net amount presented in the Statements of Condition
Gross amounts not offset in the Statements of Condition
Offsetting Derivative Positions
Collateral Posted
Net Credit Exposure
(22) Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
Derivative Assets
Fair Value
Derivative Liabilities
Fair Value
December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022
$
$
$
$
263,955 $
286,438 $
255,126 $
329,307
—
—
—
—
263,955 $
286,438 $
255,126 $
329,307
(76,514) $
(64,100) $
(76,514) $
(64,100)
(144,899)
(194,666)
—
—
42,542 $
27,672 $
178,612 $
265,207
The Company measures, monitors and discloses certain of its assets and liabilities on a fair value basis. These financial assets
and financial liabilities are measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are
traded and the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value. These levels are:
•
•
•
Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset
or liability or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other
means.
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for
which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
A financial instrument’s categorization within the above valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the assets or liabilities. The following is a
description of the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis.
Available-for-sale debt securities, trading account securities and equity securities with readily determinable fair value — Fair
values for available-for-sale debt securities, trading account securities and equity securities with readily determinable fair value
are typically based on prices obtained from independent pricing vendors. Securities measured with these valuation techniques
are generally classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Typically, standard inputs such as benchmark yields, reported
trades for similar securities, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research
publications are used to determine the fair value these securities. When these inputs are not available, broker/dealer quotes may
be obtained by the vendor to determine the fair value of the security. We review the vendor’s pricing methodologies to
determine if observable market information is being used, versus unobservable inputs. Fair value measurements using
significant inputs that are unobservable in the market due to limited activity or a less liquid market are classified as Level 3 in
the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities and certain equity securities with readily determinable fair
value are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. As such, these securities are classified as
Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s Investment Operations Department is responsible for the valuation of Level 3 available-for-sale debt securities.
The methodology and variables used as inputs in pricing Level 3 securities are derived from a combination of observable and
157
unobservable inputs. The unobservable inputs are determined through internal assumptions that may vary from period to period
due to external factors, such as market movement and credit rating adjustments.
At December 31, 2023, the Company classified $86.2 million of municipal securities as Level 3. These municipal securities are
bond issues for various municipal government entities primarily located in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern
Wisconsin and are privately placed, non-rated bonds without CUSIP numbers. The Company’s methodology for pricing these
securities focuses on three distinct inputs: equivalent rating, yield and other pricing terms. To determine the rating for a given
non-rated investment debt security, the Investment Operations Department references a rated, publicly issued bond by the same
issuer if available. A reduction is then applied to the rating obtained from the comparable bond, as the Company believes if
liquidated, a non-rated bond would be valued less than a similar bond with a verifiable rating. The reduction applied by the
Company is one complete rating grade (i.e., a “AA” rating for a comparable bond would be reduced to “A” for the Company’s
valuation). For bond issues without comparable bond proxies, a rating of “BBB” was assigned. For the year ended
December 31, 2023, all of the ratings derived by the Investment Operations Department using the above process were “BBB”
or better. The fair value measurement noted above is sensitive to the rating input, as a higher rating typically results in an
increased valuation. The remaining pricing inputs used in the bond valuation are observable. Based on the rating determined in
the above process, Investment Operations obtains a corresponding current market yield curve available to market participants.
Other terms including coupon, maturity date, redemption price, number of coupon payments per year, and accrual method are
obtained from the individual bond term sheets. Certain municipal bonds held by the Company at December 31, 2023 are
continuously callable. When valuing these bonds, the fair value is capped at par value as the Company assumes a market
participant would not pay more than par for a continuously callable bond.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale — The fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale is typically determined by reference to investor
price sheets for loan products with similar characteristics. Loans measured with this valuation technique are classified as Level
2 in the fair value hierarchy.
At December 31, 2023, the Company classified $26.8 million of certain delinquent mortgage loans held-for-sale as Level 3. For
such delinquent loans in which investor interest may be limited, the Company estimates fair value by discounting future
scheduled cash flows for the specific loan through its life, adjusted for estimated credit losses. The Company uses a discount
rate based on prevailing market coupon rates on loans with similar characteristics. The assumed weighted average discount rate
used as an input to value these loans at December 31, 2023 was 6.11%. The higher the rate utilized to discount estimated future
cash flows, the lower the fair value measurement. Additionally, the weighted average credit discount used as an input to value
the specific loans was 0.40% with a credit loss discount ranging from 0% to 11% at December 31, 2023.
Loans held-for-investment — The fair value for certain loans in which the Company previously elected the fair value option is
estimated by discounting future scheduled cash flows for the specific loan through maturity, adjusted for estimated credit losses
and prepayment or life assumptions. These loans primarily consist of early buyout loans guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies that are delinquent and, as a result, investor interest may be limited. The Company uses a discount rate based on the
actual coupon rate of the underlying loan. At December 31, 2023, the Company classified $60.7 million of loans held-for-
investment carried at fair value as Level 3. The assumed weighted average discount rate used as an input to value these loans at
December 31, 2023 was 6.18%. The higher the rate utilized to discount estimated future cash flows, the lower the fair value
measurement. As noted above, the fair value estimate also includes assumptions of prepayment speeds and average life as well
as credit losses. The weighted average prepayments speed used as an input to value current loans was 7.91% at December 31,
2023. Prepayment speeds are inversely related to the fair value of these loans as an increase in prepayment speeds results in a
decreased valuation. For delinquent loans in which performance is not assumed and there is a higher probability of resolution of
the loan ending in foreclosure, the weighted average life of such loans was 6.0 years. Average life is inversely related to the fair
value of these loans as an increase in estimated life results in a decreased valuation. Additionally, the weighted average credit
discount used as an input to value the specific loans was 0.96% with credit loss discounts ranging from 0% to 29% at
December 31, 2023.
158
MSRs — Fair value for MSRs is determined utilizing a valuation model which calculates the fair value of each servicing right
based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The Company uses a discount rate commensurate with the risk
associated with each servicing right, given current market conditions. At December 31, 2023, the Company classified $192.5
million of MSRs as Level 3. The weighted average discount rate used as an input to value the pool of MSRs at December 31,
2023 was 11.00% with discount rates applied ranging from 6% to 25%. The higher the rate utilized to discount estimated future
cash flows, the lower the fair value measurement. The fair value of MSRs was also estimated based on other assumptions
including prepayment speeds and the cost to service. Prepayment speeds ranged from 0% to 90% or a weighted average
prepayment speed of 7.91%. Further, for current and delinquent loans, the Company assumed a weighted average cost of
servicing of $77 and $393, respectively, per loan. Prepayment speeds and the cost to service are both inversely related to the
fair value of MSRs as an increase in prepayment speeds or the cost to service results in a decreased valuation. See Note (6)
“Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)” for further discussion of MSRs.
Derivative instruments — The Company’s derivative instruments include interest rate swaps, caps and collars, commitments to
fund mortgages for sale into the secondary market (interest rate locks), forward commitments to end investors for the sale of
mortgage loans, commodity future contracts and foreign currency contracts. Interest rate swaps, caps and collars and
commodity future contracts are valued by a third party, using models that primarily use market observable inputs, such as yield
curves and commodity prices prevailing at the measurement date, and are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The
credit risk associated with derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements is measured on a net
basis by counterparty portfolio. The fair value for mortgage-related derivatives is based on changes in mortgage rates from the
date of the commitments. The fair value of foreign currency derivatives is computed based on change in foreign currency rates
stated in the contract compared to those prevailing at the measurement date.
At December 31, 2023, the Company classified $4.5 million of derivative assets related to interest rate locks as Level 3. The
fair value of interest rate locks is based on prices obtained for loans with similar characteristics from third parties, adjusted for
the pull-through rate, which represents the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood that a committed loan will ultimately
fund. The weighted-average pull-through rate at December 31, 2023 was 73.96% with pull-through rates applied ranging from
6% to 100%. Pull-through rates are directly related to the fair value of interest rate locks as an increase in the pull-through rate
results in an increased valuation.
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets — The underlying assets relating to the nonqualified deferred compensation plan
are included in a trust and primarily consist of non-exchange traded institutional funds which are priced based by an
independent third party service. These assets are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
159
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods
presented:
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes
Mortgage-backed
Trading account securities
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
Loans held-for-investment
MSRs
Nonqualified deferred compensations assets
Derivative assets
Total
Derivative liabilities
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury
U.S. government agencies
Municipal
Corporate notes
Mortgage-backed
Trading account securities
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
Loans held-for-investment
MSRs
Nonqualified deferred compensations assets
Derivative assets
Total
Derivative liabilities
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2023
6,968 $
45,124
140,958
76,531
3,233,334
4,707
139,268
292,722
155,261
192,456
15,238
275,726
4,578,293 $
267,255 $
6,968 $
—
—
—
—
—
131,202
—
—
—
—
—
138,170 $
— $
— $
45,124
54,721
76,531
3,233,334
4,707
8,066
265,887
94,591
—
15,238
271,216
4,069,415 $
267,255 $
—
—
86,237
—
—
—
—
26,835
60,670
192,456
—
4,510
370,708
—
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2022
14,948 $
74,222
168,655
85,705
2,899,487
1,127
110,365
299,935
179,932
230,225
13,899
296,848
4,375,348 $
338,078 $
14,948 $
—
—
—
—
—
102,299
—
—
—
—
—
117,247 $
— $
— $
74,222
51,118
85,705
2,899,487
1,127
8,066
251,280
95,767
—
13,899
295,137
3,775,808 $
338,078 $
—
—
117,537
—
—
—
—
48,655
84,165
230,225
—
1,711
482,293
—
$
$
$
$
$
$
The aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 for mortgage loans held-
for-sale measured at fair value under ASC 825 was $291.7 million and $308.9 million, respectively, while the aggregate fair
value of mortgage loans held-for-sale was $292.7 million and $299.9 million, respectively, as shown in the above tables. At
December 31, 2023, $649,000 of mortgage loans held-for-sale were classified as nonaccrual compared to $5.8 million as of
December 31, 2022. Additionally, there were $26.6 million of loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest
within the mortgage loans held-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 2023 compared to $44.0 million as of December 31, 2022.
All of the nonaccrual loans and loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing within the mortgage loans held-for-sale
portfolio as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were individual delinquent mortgage loans bought back from
GNMA at the unconditional option of the Company as servicer for those loans.
The aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 for loans held-for-
investment measured at fair value under ASC 825 was $156.9 million and $184.0 million, respectively, while the aggregate fair
value of loans held-for-investment was $155.3 million and $179.9 million, respectively, as shown in the above tables.
160
The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022
are summarized as follows:
(In thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2023
Total net gains (losses) included in:
Net income (1)
Other comprehensive income or loss
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Net transfers into Level 3
Balance at December 31, 2023
(In thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2022
Total net (losses) gains included in:
Net income (1)
Other comprehensive income or loss
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Net transfers into Level 3
Balance at December 31, 2022
Mortgage
loans held-
for-sale
Municipal
$ 117,537 $ 48,655
Loans held-for-
investment
MSRs
Derivative
assets
$
84,165 $ 230,225 $
1,711
—
(7,152)
36,688
—
—
1,960
—
—
—
—
(75,342)
51,562
$ 86,237 $ 26,835
(60,836)
—
Mortgage
loans held-
for-sale
Municipal
$ 105,687 $
(103)
—
—
—
—
(7,599)
—
—
—
(30,170)
(69,218)
45,826
60,670 $ 192,456 $
—
—
$
2,799
—
—
—
—
—
—
4,510
Loans held-for-
investment
MSRs
Derivative
assets
—
$
15,891 $ 147,571 $ 10,560
—
(8,766)
60,546
—
—
(39,930)
(2,749)
—
—
—
—
(43,434)
(4,177)
82,654
(8,849)
—
—
—
—
(38,319)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
94,838
$ 117,537 $ 48,655
$
110,770
84,165 $ 230,225 $
—
—
1,711
(1) Changes in the balance of mortgage loans held-for-sale, MSRs and derivative assets related to fair value adjustments
are recorded as components of mortgage banking revenue. Changes in the balance of loans held-for-investment related
to fair value adjustments are recorded as other non-interest income.
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis in
accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from impairment charges on individual assets. For assets
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis that were still held in the balance sheet at the end of the period, the following
table provides the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at December 31, 2023.
(In thousands)
Individually assessed loans -
foreclosure probable and collateral-
dependent
Other real estate owned (1)
Total
December 31, 2023
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Year Ended
December 31, 2023
Fair Value Losses
Recognized, net
$
$
91,153 $
13,309
104,462 $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
91,153 $
13,309
104,462 $
29,194
104
29,298
(1) Net fair value losses recognized on other real estate owned include valuation adjustments and charge-offs during the
respective period.
Individually assessed loans — In accordance with ASC 326, the allowance for credit losses for loans and other financial assets
held at amortized cost should be measured on a collective or pooled basis when such assets exhibit similar risk characteristics.
In instances in which a financial asset does not exhibit similar risk characteristics to a pool, the Company is required to measure
such allowance for credit losses on an individual asset basis. For the Company’s loan portfolio, nonaccrual loans are considered
161
to not exhibit similar risk characteristics as pools and thus are individually assessed. Credit losses are measured by estimating
the fair value of the loan based on the present value of expected cash flows, the market price of the loan, or the fair value of the
underlying collateral. Individually assessed loans are considered a fair value measurement where an allowance for credit loss is
established based on the fair value of collateral. Appraised values on relevant real estate properties, which may require
adjustments to market-based valuation inputs, are generally used on foreclosure probable and collateral-dependent loans within
the real estate portfolios.
The Company’s Managed Assets Division is primarily responsible for the valuation of Level 3 inputs of individually assessed
loans. For more information on individually assessed loans refer to Note (5) “Allowance for Credit Losses”. At December 31,
2023, the Company had $91.2 million of individually assessed loans classified as Level 3. All of the $91.2 million of
individually assessed loans were measured at fair value based on the underlying collateral of the loan as shown in the table
above. None were valued based on discounted cash flows in accordance with ASC 310.
Other real estate owned — Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate acquired in partial or full satisfaction of loans
and is included in other assets. Other real estate owned is recorded at its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs at the
date of transfer, with any excess of the related loan balance over the fair value less expected selling costs charged to the
allowance for loan losses. Subsequent changes in value are reported as adjustments to the carrying amount and are recorded in
other non-interest expense. Gains and losses upon sale, if any, are also charged to other non-interest expense. Fair value is
generally based on third party appraisals and internal estimates that are adjusted by a discount representing the estimated cost of
sale and is therefore considered a Level 3 valuation.
The Company’s Managed Assets Division is primarily responsible for the valuation of Level 3 inputs for other real estate
owned. At December 31, 2023, the Company had $13.3 million of other real estate owned classified as Level 3. The
unobservable input applied to other real estate owned relates to the 10% reduction to the appraisal value representing the
estimated cost of sale of the foreclosed property. A higher discount for the estimated cost of sale results in a decreased carrying
value.
162
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used to measure both recurring and non-recurring Level 3 fair
value measurements at December 31, 2023 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation
Methodology
Significant Unobservable
Input
Range
of Inputs
Weighted
Average
of Inputs
Impact to valuation
from an increased
or higher input value
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Municipal securities
Mortgage loans held-
for-sale
26,835 Discounted cash
flows
$ 86,237 Bond pricing
Loans held-for-
investment
60,670 Discounted cash
flows
MSRs
192,456 Discounted cash
flows
Derivatives
4,510 Discounted cash
flows
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
91,153 Appraisal value
Individually assessed
loans - foreclosure
probable and
collateral-dependent
Other real estate
owned
13,309 Appraisal value
Equivalent rating
Discount rate
Credit discount
Discount rate
Credit discount
Constant prepayment
rate (CPR) - current
loans
Average life -
delinquent loans (in
years)
Discount rate
Constant prepayment
rate (CPR)
Cost of servicing
Cost of servicing -
delinquent
Pull-through rate
Appraisal adjustment -
cost of sale
Appraisal adjustment -
cost of sale
BBB-AA+
6.11 %
N/A Increase
6.11 % Decrease
0% - 11%
6.11% - 7.00%
0.40 % Decrease
6.18 % Decrease
0% - 29%
7.91 %
0.96 % Decrease
7.91 % Decrease
1.1 years -
10.6 years
6.0 years Decrease
6% - 25%
11.00 % Decrease
0% - 90%
7.91 % Decrease
$70 - $200
$200 - $1,000
$
77
$ 393
Decrease
Decrease
6% - 100%
73.96 % Increase
10 %
10.00 % Decrease
10 %
10.00 % Decrease
163
The Company is required under applicable accounting guidance to report the fair value of all financial instruments on the
Consolidated Statements of Condition, including those financial instruments carried at cost. The table below presents the
carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of the dates shown:
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
Available-for-sale securities
Held-to-maturity securities
Trading account securities
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value
$
423,464 $
423,464 $
490,966 $
2,084,323
3,502,915
3,856,916
4,707
139,268
2,084,323
3,502,915
3,215,468
4,707
139,268
1,988,719
3,243,017
3,640,567
1,127
110,365
490,966
1,988,719
3,243,017
2,949,821
1,127
110,365
FHLB and FRB stock, at cost
Brokerage customer receivables
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value
Loans held-for-investment, at fair value
Loans held-for-investment, at amortized cost
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets
Derivative assets
Accrued interest receivable and other
Total financial assets
Financial Liabilities:
Non-maturity deposits
Deposits with stated maturities
FHLB advances
Other borrowings
Subordinated notes
Junior subordinated debentures
Derivative liabilities
Accrued interest payable
Total financial liabilities
205,003
10,592
292,722
155,261
41,976,570
15,238
275,726
477,832
224,759
16,387
299,935
179,932
38,018,678
13,899
296,848
379,719
$ 53,420,537 $ 51,892,529 $ 49,902,793 $ 48,214,172
205,003
10,592
292,722
155,261
41,090,010
15,238
275,726
477,832
224,759
16,387
299,935
179,932
39,016,553
13,899
296,848
379,719
$ 38,772,098 $ 38,772,098 $ 38,167,409 $ 38,167,409
4,085,058
2,219,983
569,342
409,395
253,405
338,078
22,176
$ 49,378,857 $ 49,372,157 $ 46,866,441 $ 46,064,846
4,735,135
2,316,071
596,614
437,392
253,566
338,078
22,176
6,603,746
2,367,107
643,755
413,501
253,579
267,255
51,116
6,625,072
2,326,071
645,813
437,866
253,566
267,255
51,116
Not all the financial instruments listed in the table above are subject to the disclosure provisions of ASC Topic 820, as certain
assets and liabilities result in their carrying value approximating fair value. These include cash and cash equivalents, interest
bearing deposits with banks, brokerage customer receivables, FHLB and FRB stock, accrued interest receivable and accrued
interest payable and non-maturity deposits.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments that were
not previously disclosed.
Held-to-maturity securities — Held-to-maturity securities include U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, municipal
bonds issued by various municipal government entities primarily located in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern
Wisconsin and mortgage-backed securities. Fair values for held-to-maturity securities are typically based on prices obtained
from independent pricing vendors. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has generally categorized these held-to-maturity
securities as a Level 2 fair value measurement. Fair values for certain other held-to-maturity securities are based on the bond
pricing methodology discussed previously related to certain available-for-sale securities. In accordance with ASC 820, the
Company has categorized these held-to-maturity securities as a Level 3 fair value measurement.
Loans held-for-investment, at amortized cost — Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial
characteristics. Loans are analyzed by type such as commercial, residential real estate, etc. Each category is further segmented
by interest rate type (fixed and variable) and term. For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently, estimated fair values are based
on carrying values, and the Company has categorized loans as a Level 2 fair value measurement. The fair value of fixed rate
164
loans is estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates
that reflect credit and interest rate risks inherent in the loan. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized loans
as a Level 3 fair value measurement.
Deposits with stated maturities — The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash
flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently in effect for deposits of similar remaining maturities. In
accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized deposits with stated maturities as a Level 3 fair value measurement.
FHLB advances — The fair value of FHLB advances is obtained from the FHLB, which uses a discounted cash flow analysis
based on current market rates of similar maturity debt securities to discount cash flows. In accordance with ASC 820, the
Company has categorized FHLB advances as a Level 3 fair value measurement.
Subordinated notes — The fair value of the subordinated notes is based on a market price obtained from an independent pricing
vendor. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized subordinated notes as a Level 2 fair value measurement.
Junior subordinated debentures — The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is based on the discounted value of
contractual cash flows. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized junior subordinated debentures as a Level 3
fair value measurement.
(23) Shareholders’ Equity
A summary of the Company’s common and preferred stock at December 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows:
Common Stock:
Shares authorized
Shares issued
Shares outstanding
Cash dividend per share
Preferred Stock:
Shares authorized
Shares issued
Shares outstanding
2023
2022
100,000,000
61,268,566
61,243,626
$
1.60 $
20,000,000
5,011,500
5,011,500
100,000,000
60,797,270
60,794,008
1.36
20,000,000
5,011,500
5,011,500
The Company reserves shares of its authorized common stock specifically for the 2022 Plan, the ESPP and the DDFS. The
reserved shares and these plans are detailed in Note (18) “Stock Compensation Plans and Other Employee Benefit Plans”.
Common Stock Offering
In June 2022, the Company sold a total of 3,450,000 shares of its common stock through a public offering. Net proceeds to the
Company totaled approximately $285.7 million, net of estimated issuance costs.
Series D Preferred Stock
In June 2015, the Company issued and sold 5,000,000 shares of fixed-to-floating non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
Series D, liquidation preference $25 per share (the “Series D Preferred Stock”) for $125.0 million in a public offering. When, as
and if declared, dividends on the Series D Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears at a fixed rate of 6.50% per annum
from the original issuance date to, but excluding, July 15, 2025, and from (and including) that date (as currently specified in the
certificate of designations and subject to the below) at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus a spread of 4.06% per
annum. Under the AIRLA and Part 253 of Regulation ZZ (Rule 253), the dividend rate on the Series D Preferred Stock, by
operation of law, changed from 3-month USD LIBOR to 3-month CME Term SOFR plus a statutory tenor spread adjustment of
0.26161%. Consequently, for each floating rate period, commencing on July 15, 2025, any dividends will be paid at a rate of
the then-current 3-month CME Term SOFR plus 0.26161%, plus the spread of 4.06% per annum. The calculation agent for the
Series D Preferred Stock may also make additional administrative conforming changes to the terms of the Series D Preferred
Stock under AIRLA and Rule 253.
165
Series E Preferred Stock
In May 2020, the Company issued 11,500 shares of fixed-rate reset non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series E,
liquidation preference $25,000 per share (the “Series E Preferred Stock”) as part of a $287.5 million public offering of
11,500,000 depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of Series E Preferred Stock. When, as and if
declared, dividends on the Series E Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears at a fixed rate of 6.875% per annum from
October 15, 2020 to, but excluding, July 15, 2025, and from (and including) July 15, 2025 at a floating rate equal to the Five-
Year Treasury Rate (as defined in the certificate of designations for the Series E Preferred Stock) plus 6.507%.
Other
At the January 2024 Board of Directors meeting, a quarterly cash dividend of $0.45 per share of common stock ($1.80 on an
annualized basis) was declared. It was paid on February 22, 2024 to shareholders of record as of February 8, 2024.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income or Loss
The following tables summarize the components of other comprehensive income or loss, including the related income tax
effects, and the related amount reclassified to net income for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
(In thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2023
Other comprehensive income (loss) during the period, net of tax, before
reclassifications
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
into net income, net of tax
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
related to amortization of unrealized gains on investment securities
transferred to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale, net of tax
Net other comprehensive income during the period, net of tax
Balance at December 31, 2023
Balance at January 1, 2022
Other comprehensive loss during the period, net of tax, before
reclassifications
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
into net income, net of tax
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
related to amortization of unrealized gains on investment securities
transferred to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale, net of tax
Net other comprehensive loss during the period, net of tax
Balance at December 31, 2022
Balance at January 1, 2021
Other comprehensive (loss) income during the period, net of tax, before
reclassifications
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
into net income, net of tax
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
related to amortization of unrealized gains on investment securities
transferred to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale, net of tax
Net other comprehensive (loss) income during the period, net of tax
Balance at December 31, 2021
Accumulated
Unrealized
Gains
(Losses) on
Securities
Accumulated
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivative
Instruments
Accumulated
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
$ (386,057) $
7,381 $
(48,960) $
(427,636)
36,214
(16,334)
6,377
26,257
(699)
41,002
—
40,303
(155)
$
35,360 $
$ (350,697) $
—
24,668 $
32,049 $
—
6,377 $
(42,583) $
(155)
66,405
(361,231)
$
8,724 $
27,111 $
(31,743) $
4,092
(394,332)
(17,295)
(17,217)
(428,844)
(321)
(2,435)
—
(2,756)
(128)
$ (394,781) $
$ (386,057) $
—
(19,730) $
7,381 $
—
(17,217) $
(48,960) $
(128)
(431,728)
(427,636)
$
70,737 $
(23,090) $
(32,265) $
15,382
(61,047)
30,482
(789)
19,719
522
—
(30,043)
18,930
(177)
(62,013) $
8,724 $
$
$
—
50,201 $
27,111 $
—
522 $
(31,743) $
(177)
(11,290)
4,092
166
Details Regarding the Component of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
Gains included in net income
Tax effect
Net of tax
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for
the Years Ended,
December 31,
2023
2022
(In thousands)
Impacted Line on the
Consolidated Statements of Income
$
$
951 $
951
(252)
439
439
Gains (losses) on investment securities,
net
Income before taxes
(118) Income tax expense
699 $
321 Net income
Accumulated unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments
Amount reclassified to interest income on loans
$
74,616 $
1,443
Interest and fees on loans
Amount reclassified to interest expense on deposits
Amount reclassified to interest expense on other borrowings
Tax effect
Net of tax
(24) Segment Information
(19,559)
789
(55,846)
14,844
(5,675) Interest on deposits
913
3,319
Interest on other borrowings
Income before taxes
(884) Income tax expense
$
(41,002) $
2,435 Net income
The Company’s operations consist of three primary segments: community banking, specialty finance and wealth management.
The three reportable segments are strategic business units that are separately managed as they offer different products and
services and have different marketing strategies. In addition, each segment’s customer base has varying characteristics and each
segment has a different regulatory environment. While the Company’s management monitors each of the fifteen bank
subsidiaries’ operations and profitability separately, these subsidiaries have been aggregated into one reportable operating
segment due to the similarities in products and services, customer base, operations, profitability measures and economic
characteristics.
For purposes of internal segment profitability, management allocates certain intersegment and parent company balances.
Management allocates a portion of revenues to the specialty finance segment related to loans and leases originated by the
specialty finance segment and sold or assigned to the community banking segment. Similarly, for purposes of analyzing the
contribution from the wealth management segment, management allocates a portion of the net interest income earned by the
community banking segment on deposit balances of customers of the wealth management segment to the wealth management
segment. See Note (10) “Deposits” for more information on these deposits. Finally, expenses incurred at the Wintrust parent
company are allocated to each segment based on each segment’s risk-weighted assets.
The segment financial information provided in the following tables has been derived from the internal profitability reporting
system used by management to monitor and manage the financial performance of the Company. The accounting policies of the
segments are substantially similar to those described in Note (1) “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”. The Company
evaluates segment performance based on after-tax profit or loss and other appropriate profitability measures common to each
segment.
167
The following is a summary of certain operating information for reportable segments:
(In thousands)
2023
Net interest income
Provision for credit losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Total assets at end of year
2022
Net interest income
Provision for credit losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Total assets at end of year
2021
Net interest income
Provision for credit losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Total assets at end of year
Community
Banking
Specialty
Finance
Wealth
Management
Total
Operating
Segments
Intersegment
Eliminations
Consolidated
$ 1,440,975 $
104,895
263,023
1,036,432
148,612
414,059 $
329,044 $ 32,736 $ 1,802,755 $
—
136,561
125,915
10,359
114,390
505,576
1,348,860
222,455
622,626 $
$
$ 44,355,786 $ 10,664,887 $ 1,239,261 $ 56,259,934 $
9,495
105,992
186,513
63,484
175,544 $ 33,023 $
$ 1,180,198 $
74,184
298,572
926,298
128,939
349,349 $
246,681 $ 38,304 $ 1,465,183 $
—
124,609
107,839
15,648
78,589
520,882
1,206,921
190,873
$
509,682 $
$ 41,368,200 $ 9,826,254 $ 1,755,195 $ 52,949,649 $
4,405
97,701
172,784
46,286
120,907 $ 39,426 $
$
868,477 $
(60,309)
422,698
912,296
120,092
319,096 $
197,958 $ 31,939 $ 1,098,374 $
(59,263)
—
128,951
647,471
1,167,312
111,490
171,645
11,513
$
466,151 $
$ 40,253,818 $ 8,382,722 $ 1,505,603 $ 50,142,143 $
1,046
95,822
143,526
40,040
109,168 $ 37,887 $
—
35,109 $ 1,837,864
114,390
(71,470)
434,106
(36,361) 1,312,499
222,455
—
622,626
— $
— $ 56,259,934
—
30,179 $ 1,495,362
78,589
(59,829)
461,053
(29,650) 1,177,271
190,873
—
— $
509,682
— $ 52,949,649
—
26,583 $ 1,124,957
(59,263)
(61,351)
586,120
(34,768) 1,132,544
171,645
—
— $
466,151
— $ 50,142,143
168
(25) Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements
Condensed parent company only financial statements of Wintrust follow:
Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands)
Assets
Cash
Available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Investment in and receivable from subsidiaries
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Other liabilities
Subordinated notes
Other borrowings
Junior subordinated debentures
Shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Statements of Income
(In thousands)
Income
Dividends and other revenue from subsidiaries
Other income (losses)
Total income
Expenses
Interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
Other expenses
Total expenses
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income
of subsidiaries
Income tax benefit
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed net income of
subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
Net income
169
December 31,
2023
2022
$
262,680 $
266,350
15,532
5,842,160
8,371
364,623
14,771
5,282,530
8,371
360,309
$ 6,493,366 $ 5,932,331
$
171,922 $
437,866
230,486
253,566
5,399,526
183,475
437,392
261,060
253,566
4,796,838
$ 6,493,366 $ 5,932,331
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
433,784 $
1,729
435,513 $
53,612 $
145,011
160,259
358,882 $
120,151 $
(12,969)
107,182 $
36,522 $
138,466
155,744
330,732 $
76,631 $
72,260
(223,550) $
70,490
148,891 $
473,735
622,626 $
(153,060) $
662,742
509,682 $
211,774
2,763
214,537
38,293
109,142
139,816
287,251
(72,714)
56,529
(16,185)
482,336
466,151
Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities
Losses (gains) on available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities
with readily determinable fair value, net
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
Stock-based compensation expense
(Increase) decrease in other assets
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
Net Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities
Investing Activities:
Capital contributions to subsidiaries, net
Other investing activity, net
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities
Financing Activities:
(Decrease) increase in subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior
subordinated debentures, net
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net
Issuance of common shares resulting from exercise of stock options and
employee stock purchase plan
Dividends paid
Common stock repurchases under authorized program
Common stock repurchases for tax withholdings related to stock-based
compensation
Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Financing Activities
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
622,626 $
509,682 $
466,151
(442)
25,840
(6,176)
14,154
(3,978)
(6,059)
(473,735)
172,230 $
7,018
27,642
(2,773)
13,632
(7,116)
(6,107)
(662,742)
(120,764) $
(1,794)
28,783
(5,350)
6,769
6,598
1,225
(482,336)
20,046
— $
(25,965)
(25,965) $
(69,000) $
(30,872)
(99,872) $
(27,000)
(22,877)
(49,877)
$
$
$
$
(30,641) $
117,381 $
(23,274)
—
285,729
—
8,309
(125,690)
11,233
(108,210)
—
—
19,824
(98,629)
(9,540)
(1,913)
(149,935) $
(304)
305,829 $
—
(111,619)
(3,670) $
266,350
262,680 $
85,193 $
181,157
266,350 $
(141,450)
322,607
181,157
$
$
$
170
(26) Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for 2023, 2022 and 2021:
(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income
Less: Preferred stock dividends
Net income applicable to common shares
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive potential common shares:
Common stock equivalents
(A)
(B)
Weighted average common shares and effect of dilutive potential common
shares
(C)
2023
2022
2021
$
622,626 $
509,682 $
466,151
27,964
27,964
27,964
$
594,662 $
481,718 $
438,187
61,149
59,205
56,994
938
886
792
62,087
60,091
57,786
Net income per common share:
Basic
Diluted
(A/B) $
(A/C)
9.72 $
8.14 $
9.58
8.02
7.69
7.58
Potentially dilutive common shares can result from stock options, restricted stock unit awards and shares to be issued under the
ESPP and the DDFS Plan, being treated as if they had been either exercised or issued, computed by application of the treasury
stock method. While potentially dilutive common shares are typically included in the computation of diluted earnings per share,
potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from this computation in periods in which the effect would reduce the loss per
share or increase the income per share.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
The Company made no changes in and had no disagreements with its independent accountants during the two most recent fiscal
years or any subsequent interim period.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, management of the Company, under the supervision
and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined under Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in ensuring the
information relating to the Company (and its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports
it files or submits under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
December 31, 2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
171
Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Wintrust Financial Corporation is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements and notes included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States and necessarily include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.
We, as management of Wintrust Financial Corporation, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States. The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial
statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits. Actions
are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed,
has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary
over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to
financial statement preparation.
Management assessed the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, in relation to
criteria for the effective internal control over financial reporting as described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (COSO Criteria). Based on
this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2023, the Company's system of internal control over financial
reporting is effective and meets the criteria of the COSO Criteria. Ernst & Young LLP (PCAOB ID 42), the independent
registered public accounting firm that audited the Company's financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-
K, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
Their report expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2023.
/s/ Timothy S. Crane
Timothy S. Crane
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Rosemont, Illinois
February 28, 2024
/s/ David L. Stoehr
David L. Stoehr
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
172
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Wintrust Financial Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Wintrust Financial Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Wintrust Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated statements of condition of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes and our report dated February 28, 2024 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report on
Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and
the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2024
173
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Securities Trading Plans of Directors and Officers
During the three months ended December 31, 2023, none of our directors or officers adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1
trading plan or adopted or terminated a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of
Regulation S-K).
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held May 23, 2024 (the “Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors,”
“Executive Officers of the Company,” “Board of Directors, Committees and Governance” and “Delinquent Section 16(a)
Reports” and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Corporate Code of Ethics which complies with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the
NASDAQ Global Select Market. The code applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees and is posted on
the Company’s website (www.wintrust.com), under the “Corporate Governance” section of the “Investor Relations” tab. The
Company will post on its website any amendments to, or waivers from, its Corporate Code of Ethics as the code applies to its
directors or executive officers.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement under the captions
“Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” “Director Compensation” “Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation” “CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure” and “Compensation Committee Report” and is incorporated
herein by reference. The information included under the heading “Compensation Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement
shall not be deemed “soliciting” materials or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
174
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference to the
materials under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Management” that will be
included in the Company’s Proxy Statement.
The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2023, relating to the Company’s equity compensation plans
pursuant to which common stock is authorized for issuance:
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
WTFC 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
WTFC 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
WTFC 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
WTFC 2022 Stock Incentive Plan
WTFC Employee Stock Purchase Plan
WTFC Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
N/A
Total
Number of
securities to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
85,000
17,442
904,230
554,480
—
—
1,561,152
—
1,561,152
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,164,587
174,848
371,527
1,710,962
—
1,710,962
(1) Excludes 13,100 shares of the Company’s common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of options granted under the plan of STC Bancshares
Corporation. The weighted average exercise price of these options is $42.76. No additional awards will be made under this plan.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement under the caption
“Related Party Transactions” and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement under the caption “Audit
and Non-Audit Fees Paid” and is incorporated herein by reference.
175
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1
Financial Statements
The following financial statements of Wintrust Financial Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Consolidated Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2023 and 2022
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022
and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules have been omitted as they are not applicable or the required information is shown in
the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits (Exhibits marked with a “*” denote management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements)
Exhibit Description
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibits 3.1
and 3.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July
29, 2011 and Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
Restated Certificate of Designations of the Company filed on May 5, 2023 with the Secretary of State of the State
of Illinois designating the preferences, limitations, voting powers and relative rights of the Series D Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2023).
Certificate of Designations of the Company filed on May 7, 2020 with the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois
designating the preferences, limitations, voting powers and relative rights of the Series E Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2020).
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 2023).
Description of the Company’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the total assets of the
Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees
to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Form of Subordinated Indenture between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2020).
Form of Depositary Receipt (incorporated by reference as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2020).
2
3
Exhibit
No.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
176
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
Deposit Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2020, among Wintrust Financial Corporation, U.S. Bank National
Association, as Depositary, and the holders from time to time of the Depositary Receipts issued thereunder
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2020).
Subordinated Indenture, dated June 13, 2014, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 13, 2014 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2014).
Form of 5.000% Subordinated Note due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2014).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 6, 2019 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2019).
Form of 4.850% Subordinated Notes due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2019).
Form of Subordinated Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2020).
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2018, among the Company, the lenders named therein, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and sole lead arranger (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on September 19, 2018).
First Amendment, dated as of September 17, 2019, to the Credit Agreement dated as of September 18, 2018, as
amended, among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 19, 2019).
Second Amendment, dated as of September 15, 2020, to the Credit Agreement dated as of September 18, 2018, as
amended, among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 17, 2020).
Third Amendment, dated as of September 14, 2021, to the Credit Agreement dated as of September 18, 2018, as
amended, among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 14, 2021).
Fourth Amendment, dated as of December 23, 2021, to the Credit Agreement dated as of September 18, 2018, as
amended, among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 2021).
Fifth Amendment, dated as of September 13, 2022, to the Credit Agreement dated as of September 18, 2018, as
amended, among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2022).
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2022, by and among Wintrust Financial
Corporation, as Borrower, the lenders who are party to the Agreement and the lenders who may become a party to
the Agreement pursuant to terms hereof, as Lenders, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, a national
banking association, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15,
2022).
177
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
First Amendment, dated as of July 17, 2023 to the Credit Agreement dated December 12, 2022, as amended and
restated, among the Company, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2023).
Second Amendment, dated as of December 11, 2023 to the Credit Agreement dated December 12, 2022, as
amended and restated, among the Company, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2023).
Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2014, by and among First Insurance Funding of
Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, in its capacity as Trustee of PLAZA Trust, by its Financial Service
Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2014).
First Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated December 15, 2015, by and among First
Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, in its capacity as Trustee of PLAZA Trust, by
its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016).
Second Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated September 9, 2016, by and among
First Insurance Funding of Canada, Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, in its capacity as Trustee of PLAZA
Trust, by its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28,
2018).
Third Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated December 15, 2017, by and among
First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, in its capacity as Trustee of PLAZA
Trust, by its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 18,
2017).
Fourth Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated June 29, 2018, by and among First
Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, in its capacity as Trustee of PLAZA Trust, by
its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2018).
Fifth Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2019 by and between
First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust, by its
Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2019).
Sixth Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2019 by and between
First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust, by its
Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2019).
Seventh Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, date as of January 15, 2020 by and
between First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust,
by its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 17, 2020).
Eighth Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated May 20, 2020, by and between First
Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust, in its capacity as trustee of the PLAZA Trust, by its
Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2020).
Ninth Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated January 15, 2021, by and between First
Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust, in its capacity as trustee of the PLAZA Trust, by its
Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 20, 2021).
Tenth Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2022, by and between
First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA
Trust, by its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2022).
178
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
Eleventh Amending Agreement to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2023, by and between
First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA
Trust, by its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2023).
Performance Guarantee, made as of December 16, 2014, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon Trust
Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2014).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, made as of December 15, 2017, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon
Trust Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 18,
2017).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of June 28, 2018, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon Trust
Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2018).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of February 15, 2019, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon
Trust Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22,
2019).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of May 27, 2019, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon Trust
Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2019).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of January 15, 2020, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon
Trust Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 17, 2020).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of May 20, 2020, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon Trust
Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2020).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of January 15, 2021, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon
Trust Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 20, 2021).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of May 2, 2022, by the Company in favor of CIBC Mellon Trust
Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2022).
Performance Guarantee Confirmation, dated as of May 31, 2023, confirming the Performance Guarantee dates as
of December 16, 2014, by and between the Company and PLAZA Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6,
2023).
Fee Letter, dated as of May 31, 2023, between First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust
Company, in its capacity as trustee of PLAZA Trust, by its Financial Service Agent, Royal Bank of Canada and
acknowledged by First Insurance Funding of Canada Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2022).
Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of August 2, 2005, between the Company and Wilmington Trust
Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005).
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2005, among the Company, as depositor,
Wilmington Trust Company, as property trustee and Delaware trustee, and the Administrative Trustees listed
therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005).
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2005, between the Company, as Guarantor, and Wilmington Trust
Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005).
179
10.36
10.37
10.38
10.39
10.40
10.41
10.42
10.43
10.44
10.45
10.46
10.47
10.48
10.49
10.50
10.51
Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2006, between the Company and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2006).
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of September 1, 2006, among the Company, as depositor,
LaSalle Bank National Association, as institutional trustee, Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware
trustee, and the Administrators listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2006).
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, between the Company, as Guarantor, and LaSalle Bank
National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2006).
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2023, between the Company and Edward
J. Wehmer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2023).*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 19, 2008, between the Company and David A.
Dykstra, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
24, 2008).*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 19, 2008, between the Company and Richard B.
Murphy, Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 24,
2008).*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 19, 2008, between the Company and David L.
Stoehr, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 24,
2008).*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2023, between the Company and Timothy
S. Crane (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2023).*
Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Proxy
Statement relating to the May 22, 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company).*
First Amendment to Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000).*
Second Amendment to Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the Board of
Directors on January 24, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2004).*
Third Amendment to Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the Board of Directors
on May 27, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2004).*
Wintrust Financial Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to
the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 8, 2011).*
Wintrust Financial Corporation 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 1, 2015).*
Wintrust Financial Corporation 2022 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 27, 2022).*
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006).*
180
10.52
10.53
10.54
10.55
10.56
10.57
10.58
10.59
10.60
10.61
10.62
10.63
10.64
10.65
10.66
10.67
10.68
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016).*
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award, Agreement under Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021).
Form of Performance Share Unit Award - Stock Settled under the Company's 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2013).*
Form of Performance Award Agreement - Share Settled under the Company's 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2016).*
Form of Performance Share Unit Award - Cash Settled under the Company's 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2013).*
Form of Performance Share Unit Award - Cash Settled under the Company's 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2016).*
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement - Shares Settled under the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2015).
Form of Performance Share Unit Award - Shares Settled - Deferral Option under the Company’s 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016).*
Form of Performance Award Agreement - Shares Settled under Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2021).
Form of Performance Share Unit Award - Cash Settled - Deferral Option under the Company’s 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016).*
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement - Cash Settled under the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2015).
Wintrust Financial Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Annex A
of the Company's definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24,
2012).*
Amended and Restated Wintrust Financial Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on May 25, 2018).*
Second Amended and Restated Wintrust Financial Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (incorporated by
reference to Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 8, 2021).*
Wintrust Financial Corporation Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B
of the Proxy Statement relating to the May 24, 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company).*
Wintrust Financial Corporation 2005 Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan, as amended and restated
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2014).*
Form of Cash Incentive and Retention Award Agreement under the Company’s 2008 Long-Term Cash and
Incentive Retention Plan with no Minimum Payout (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008).*
181
10.69
10.70
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009).
Form of Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009).
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
97.1
Policy on Recoupment of Incentive Compensation.
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
(1) Includes the following financial information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2023, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated
Statements of Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
182
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Registrant)
February 28, 2024
By:
/s/ TIMOTHY S. CRANE
Timothy S. Crane, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ EDWARD J. WEHMER
Edward J. Wehmer
Founder, Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors
/s/ H. PATRICK HACKETT, JR.
H. Patrick Hackett, Jr.
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Lead
Independent Director
/s/ TIMOTHY S. CRANE
Timothy S. Crane
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
/s/ DAVID L. STOEHR
David L. Stoehr
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 28, 2024
/s/ JEFFREY D. HAHNFELD
Jeffrey D. Hahnfeld
Executive Vice President, Controller, and Chief
Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
February 28, 2024
/s/ ELIZABETH H. CONNELLY
Elizabeth H. Connelly
/s/ PETER D. CRIST
Peter D. Crist
/s/ WILLIAM J. DOYLE
William J. Doyle
/s/ MARLA F. GLABE
Marla F. Glabe
/s/ SCOTT K. HEITMANN
Scott K. Heitmann
/s/ BRIAN A. KENNEY
Brian A. Kenney
/s/ DEBORAH L. HALL LEFEVRE
Deborah L. Hall Lefevre
/s/ SUZET M. MCKINNEY
Suzet M. McKinney
/s/ GARY D. “JOE” SWEENEY
Gary D. “Joe” Sweeney
/s/ KARIN GUSTAFSON TEGLIA
Karin Gustafson Teglia
/s/ ALEX E. WASHINGTON, III
Alex E. Washington, III
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
183
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024