Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / Zions Bancorporation

Zions Bancorporation

zion · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker zion
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · Zions Bancorporation
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
WESTERN 
SKIES
UNDER THE
A N N U A L  R E P O R T  2 0 2 4

A COLLECTION
OF GREAT BANKS
Zions Bancorporation is comprised of a collection of extraordinary, locally 
led and community-focused banks serving businesses, households and local 
governments in some of the best growth markets in the nation. We’re determined 
to help build strong, successful communities, create economic opportunity and help 
our clients achieve greater financial strength through the relationships we develop 
and the services we provide.

01
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
$14.8B average loans	
$21.2B average deposits
$879M total net revenue
Salt Lake City, UT
San Diego, CA
$14.3B average loans	
$14.6B average deposits
$705M total net revenue
Houston, TX
$13.4B average loans	
$14.8B average deposits
$671M total net revenue
$5.7B average loans	
$6.9B average deposits
$288M total net revenue	
Phoenix, AZ
$3.6B average loans	
$7.2B average deposits
$249M total net revenue
Las Vegas, NV
$4.1B average loans	
$3.5B average deposits
$177M total net revenue
Denver, CO
$1.8B average loans	
$1.1B average deposits
$71M total net revenue
Seattle, WA

02
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
PERFORMANCE
AT A GLANCE

03
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Annual earnings per share over the past five years
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
4.95
4.35
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
$0.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
3.02
6.79
5.79
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Growth in earnings per share indexed to 2019
100
80
60
0
40
20
120
140
160
180
ZION
Peer Top Quartile
Peer Bottom Quartile
Indexed: 2019 = 100
2020
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024

04
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
We’re proud to be their partners in helping to create some of the 
most vibrant local economies and livable communities in the nation 
− and indeed, the world.”
“Our bankers serve customers whose 
innovative spirit and determination 
to build and to grow are as inspiring 
as the skies and landscapes that have 
beckoned pioneering people to the 
West for over two centuries.
Harris Simmons  |  Chairman and CEO

05
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
This past year has been one of resilience and recovery 
from the lingering after-effects and challenges posed by 
the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and 
First Republic Bank in the spring of 2023. Despite the initial 
impact on our deposit costs, we have made significant 
strides in strengthening our financial position. Our annual­
ized net interest income has shown steady improvement 
as customer deposits stabilized and grew, and spreads 
improved, creating a strong foundation for continued growth 
and success in the coming year.
CHAIRMAN'S 
MESSAGE
TO OUR STAKEHOLDERS

06
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
06
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
As noted, the 2023 bank failures adversely impacted funding 
costs for regional banks in particular — a phenomenon that 
continued into 2024. While there was steady improvement 
in the Bank’s net interest margin as the year progressed, 
operating performance was nevertheless modestly weaker 
in 2024 as adjusted pre-provision net revenue declined 3.3% 
to $1.131 billion from $1.170 billion the prior year. Adjusted 
taxable-equivalent revenue was flat to last year, while 
adjusted operating expenses rose 2%. 
Net income available to common shareholders and earnings 
per share increased 13.7% to $737 million, and 13.8% to 
$4.95, respectively, due largely to a $79 million reduction 
in 2024 of the FDIC’s special assessment, most of which 
was incurred in 2023 and charged to all banks with over $5 
billion in assets to cover costs associated with the 2023 bank 
failures; and a $60 million reduction in the provision for credit 
losses. Our return on average assets was 0.88% and our 
return on tangible common equity was 16.2%, compared to 
0.77% and 17.3%, respectively, in 2023.
Average deposits increased 2.6% in 2024, while average 
loans grew 3.2%. Taxable-equivalent net interest income 
was unchanged at $2.48 billion, while noninterest income 
grew 3.4% to $700 million and adjusted noninterest expense 
grew 2.0% to $2.03 billion. Our total full-time equivalent 
workforce decreased by 273, or 2.8%.
One of the ways the world may have changed in the wake 
of the 2023 bank failures involves how management teams 
think about their strategies for managing interest rate risk, 
and the role that “maturity transformation” — investing 
deposits with nominally short-term maturities but with a 
history of predictable and stable behavior in loans and liquid 
securities with longer durations — plays in creating value for 
their banks. We reduced the average size of our investment 
portfolio by almost $2 billion, or 9.2%, in 2024, and expect 
to maintain a somewhat shorter duration in the portfolio in 
the years ahead because of the volatility we saw, particularly 
with larger deposits, following the failures.
We increased our quarterly common dividend 4.9% to $0.43 
per share in the fourth quarter of 2024. We also redeemed 
$374 million of higher-cost preferred shares and issued 
$500 million of subordinated debt to better optimize our 
capital structure. 
FINANCIAL 
PERFORMANCE
ADJUSTED RETURN ON TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY
Adjusted for securities gains (losses) and substitutes net charge-offs 
for provision
20%
15%
0%
10%
5%
25%
ZION
Peer Top Quartile
Peer Bottom Quartile
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

07
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
Credit losses remained well-controlled, with net charge-
offs of $60 million, or 0.10% of average loans and leases, 
compared with $36 million, or 0.06% of loans a year ago. 
While classified loans — commercial loans with well-defined 
weaknesses — increased by slightly over $2 billion during the 
year, owing to the slower lease-up of multi-family and other 
commercial real estate properties and a change in meth­
odology to place less emphasis on guarantor and sponsor 
support, nonaccrual loans, which have been identified as 
having the potential for actual loss, increased a modest $75 
million during the year, to 0.50% of total loans from 0.39% of 
loans a year ago.
Looking back several quarters, there was concern among 
some economists and investors that the economy would 
slide into recession in 2024, and that commercial real estate 
loans — and particularly those secured by office proper­
ties — would experience higher levels of losses. This did 
not materialize. The U.S. economy grew 2.8% in 2024, and 
total net losses in our $13.5 billion commercial real estate 
loan portfolio totaled a meager $8 million in the past year, 
or 0.06% of loans. Realized losses on office loans have been 
similarly low: cumulative losses over the past three years on 
this nearly $2 billion portfolio have been a mere $9 million.
“Nevada State Bank has proudly served the 
community for 65 years, becoming a trusted 
partner to countless individuals and businesses.
Nevada State Bank's 
dedication to providing
exceptional financial 
services has made 
a significant impact on 
the community, truly 
understanding the unique 
needs of Nevada."
Joe Lombardo  |  Governor of Nevada

08
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
As we enter 2025, we find ourselves on the threshold of what 
should be a very productive and profitable period for us. 
About a dozen years ago, not long after the passage of the 
Dodd-Frank Act, we held a series of town hall meetings 
with our employees in which the fundamental theme was 
“Pardon Our Dust.”  In the aftermath of the Financial Crisis 
and the ensuing Great Recession, we found ourselves desig­
nated as a “Systemically Important Financial Institution” by 
virtue of our size at just over $50 billion in total assets. We 
had accordingly become subject to the “Enhanced Prudential 
Standards” contained in Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act, 
and subsequently to the Office of the Comptroller’s “Height­
ened Expectations” standards. These regulations, along with 
our own initiatives to adapt to the post-2008 world, led to a 
fundamental overhaul of our risk management organization 
and substantive upgrades to our internal controls and risk 
management framework. They also led to a much greater 
focus on credit concentrations and a strengthening of our 
credit organization, as well as the development of central­
ized capabilities to better underwrite and service consumer 
and small business loans, and to manage deposit operations.
At the same time, we embarked on the largest technology 
project in the Bank’s history, replacing our core systems for 
consumer, commercial and commercial real estate loans, 
together with all our deposit systems in a project we dubbed 
“FutureCore.” 
The completion of the FutureCore project this past summer 
was a true milestone for the Bank. It was the most ambi­
tious technology project in our history, and without question 
one of the most ambitious technology projects undertaken 
BEGINNING 
OF A NEW ERA
“The success of the Women’s Leadership Institute
and its impact on women in the state of Utah  
could not have been achieved without the 
support and vision of Zions Bank."
Patricia Jones  |  CEO
Women's Leadership Institute

09
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
in the industry over the past decade. I’m incredibly proud of 
the many talented people in our organization — at its peak 
the project engaged over 500 employees and contractors — 
who brought this to the finish line. 
FutureCore was in turn the catalyst for a total overhaul 
and simplification of numerous processes which have been 
chronicled in these letters in recent years. We dramatically 
rationalized our deposit product set, creating consistency in 
each market. We consolidated many back-office functions, 
including our loan operations, which had been operated 
in a decentralized manner. We devoted much energy to 
organizing and cleansing data and building a strong data 
governance organization that will serve us well in an era of 
artificial intelligence. 
During this time, we also simplified our organization, consol­
idating our various bank charters — while continuing to 
maintain the local brands and management structure that 
keep us deeply rooted in the communities we serve — and 
eliminating our holding company to streamline our regula­
tory oversight.
Additionally, in recent years, we have modernized the 
“front end” digital banking applications used by both 
consumer and businesses customers, and have digitized 
new account opening, as well as the processes for applying 
for and approving virtually all consumer, mortgage and 
small business loans. We’ve also completed the transition 
to a single, uniform version of the customer relationship 
management system that serves as the communication hub 
for almost all customer calling and internal referral activity.
In short, the past several years have been a period of massive 
internal change, the likes of which I believe have been 
unmatched by virtually any other larger bank in the industry. 
We recently conducted a “core systems” day, attended by a 
variety of midsize and larger banks from across the country, 
who came to see what we’ve accomplished, and to glean 
tips on how they might think about approaching their own 
needs to replace aging systems. It was a reminder that 
we’ve completed what many other banks are realizing they 
need to begin.
Recently, we held another series of town hall meetings across 
our Western footprint. The message delivered was that, after 
COMMON EQUITY TIER 1 RATIO
At year end
2%
0%
4%
6%
10%
8%
12%
14%
9.8%
10.9%
10.3%
2022
2023
2024

10
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
10
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
a long period of intense internal focus, the successful comple­
tion of FutureCore and many other foundational renovations, 
we’re now positioned to more intentionally focus outwardly, 
and to reap the benefits of this long period of investment by 
providing better products and services and building even 
stronger relationships with customers.
Our “outward focus” this coming year will largely center on 
improving the product sets for consumers and small busi­
nesses, and more effectively marketing them through our call 
programs and a combination of more focused communica­
tions and ever-stronger banker-client relationships, paired 
with digital delivery. 
One of the most fundamental learnings from the bank 
failures of 2023 is the importance of having a granular, 
“sticky” foundation of insured deposits — the absence of 
which was a common thread in all three of the large bank 
failures. These deposits are found most notably in consumer 
and small business accounts.
In 2025, we will be reintroducing a modern version of a 
package of products and services designed for affluent 
consumers that was a mainstay of our offering years ago. 
The Gold Account will provide many of our best customers 
with a full package of banking services, including discounts 
on loans, better rates on savings and money market 
accounts, free access to any ATM across the country, a free 
safe deposit box (subject to availability), discounts on wealth 
management services, and more. We believe we have a 
strong competitive position, particularly in markets where we 
have somewhat greater name recognition, including many 
rural markets, and that “share of mind” can lead to greater 
“share of market” when great products are offered; and that 
the economics of consumer deposit accounts, particularly in 
an age where most transactions are processed digitally, are 
very attractive.
There’s great opportunity to materially increase our sale of 
wealth management services to “mass affluent” clients. We’ll 
be significantly increasing our focus on introducing clients to 
our Wealth Select offering, which is supported by a suite of 
products designed for clients with between $100,000 and $1 
million of investable assets.
Vectra Bank’s community support reflects our 
commitment 
to 
meaningful 
engagement 
and 
leadership. We’re honored to support countless 
organizations throughout Colorado and New Mexico, 
supporting causes such as financial literacy, afford­
able housing, economic development, and health 
and human services. Initiatives such as this foster a 
sense of community and giving among employees.
In 2024, Vectra Bank sponsored the Girl Scouts of 
Colorado’s Women of Distinction event, honoring 
women for their contributions to the community and 
to champion the dreams of girls everywhere. The 
event raised more than $400,000 to help support 
ongoing programs and services that impact more 
than 15,000 girls state-wide, in areas such as STEM, 
entrepreneurship, outdoors, and life skills.
BUILDING STRONGER 
COMMUNITIES THROUGH 
SUPPORTING LOCAL CAUSES

11
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
We’ll also be focusing on increasing our small business 
lending, including the loans we make in partnership with 
the U.S. Small Business Administration. In the SBA’s 2024 
fiscal year, we were the 20th largest lender in the nation as 
measured by number of loans made under the SBA’s 7(a) 
program. We expect over the next two to three years to rank 
among the top 10 lenders in the program. In achieving this 
goal, we also expect to materially increase our production 
under the SBA’s 504 program, as well as conventional small 
business lending. We market these products in tandem with 
a focus on developing a full relationship with small busi­
nesses, providing them with a small business credit card, 
a suite of treasury management products tailored for small 
businesses, and more. 
I regularly remind our bankers that the greatest satisfaction 
they’ll find in their careers won’t come from managing our 
participation in a large, syndicated credit to a name-brand 
company. It will come from helping entrepreneurs who’ve put 
all their savings into starting small businesses and helping 
them build successful and durable businesses that not only 
change the owners’ lives but provide jobs for countless 
families and build prosperous local communities. What we 
do is critical to the realization of the American Dream for 
many of our customers, and the relationships we build and 
the advice we provide as these companies grow creates 
value for both our customers and for the Bank.
Our mission to help build great small businesses is consistent 
with our vision of banking as being a very local business. Our 
employees volunteer tens of thousands of hours and provide 
leadership for numerous charities and local initiatives. For 
example, Zions Bank employees paint and freshen up scores 
of homes for their elderly, disabled and veteran neighbors 
every year during their Paint-a-Thon event. Our California 
colleagues participate in “Give Week,” during which they 
supported 42 nonprofit organizations engaged in finan­
cial literacy, community cleanups, sorting donations to food 
banks, and more. Nevada State Bank was the foundational 
sponsor for Junior Achievement’s Inspiration Center in Las 
Vegas last year, tripling the organization’s ability to serve 
Clark County School District students in one of the largest 
programs of its type in the country. The list goes on. I’m proud 
to be associated with our thousands of bankers who take 
to heart the notion that our bank is here for the purpose of 
building better neighborhoods, towns and cities — and doing 
so with not only our balance sheet but with our hearts, minds 
and shoulders. 

12
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
We regularly survey customers, using the Net Promoter 
Score® (NPS) methodology, and find that our customers 
love doing business with us. This past year, our NPS score 
for consumers was just over 60, and for small businesses 
the score was just under 55. As any result greater than 50 
is considered excellent, these are very strong showings, 
and we expect that with a greater focus on improving our 
product set, these outcomes will be even better. We also pay 
attention to the surveys conducted by Coalition Greenwich, a 
leading research organization that interviews approximately 
27,000 businesses nationwide each year to ascertain banks’ 
performance in a variety of categories. Zions finished third 
overall, receiving 13 Small Business Excellence Awards in 
2024, and seven Middle Market Excellence Awards. We’re 
one of only three banks in the United States to average more 
than 16 such awards since the program’s inception in 2009. 
Last year our branch-based bankers made 120,000 calls to 
customers — primarily small business owners — simply to 
express their appreciation for the business they do with us. 
These are deliberately not sales calls, though frequently our 
people find that we can be of help in solving a problem or 
providing a product or service. The point is, we really work 
at building relationships with our clients — relationships we 
hope will last for years. 
We’re highly regarded in the communities we serve, and 
our local marketing teams have done an admirable job in 
building our brands’ reputations in local markets. But we 
can do a better job with product marketing and have estab­
lished a corporate marketing function to complement these 
local marketing capabilities. We’ve hired a talented Chief 
Marketing Officer — the first in our history since becoming 
a multistate organization — with a charge to better commu­
nicate to prospects what our customers already know: that 
we’re a terrific bank and a refreshing and more personal 
alternative to some of the large national brands. We’ll signifi­
cantly increase our marketing spend in the coming year, 
consistent with our outward focus on profitable growth. 
National Bank of Arizona has proudly partnered with 
Junior Achievement of Arizona for the past seven 
years, contributing to the development of 190,000 
students annually. As part of a national network 
of business and community volunteers, the bank's 
associates help young people build the competence, 
confidence, and character needed for success in 
school, work, and life. By sharing their personal and 
professional experiences, National Bank of Arizona 
volunteers make a significant impact, bridging the 
gap between classroom learning and real-world 
application. A recent Junior Achievement Day saw 
22 dedicated associates participating, showcas­
ing their commitment to empowering the next 
generation. The accompanying photo captures the 
enthusiasm and dedication of these volunteers as 
they inspire and guide Arizona's youth.
EMPOWERING THE NEXT 
GENERATION BY EXPANDING 
FINANCIAL LITERACY

13
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
In September, we announced the acquisition of four branches 
in the Palm Desert, California market, with approximately 
$700 million in deposits and $400 million in loans, from First­
Bank of Lakewood, Colorado. We expect the deal to close in 
late March. Combined with our own presence in that market, 
we expect to have the largest market share, behind the three 
large national players, in this attractive market. It’s the type 
of market position with which we typically thrive, and we 
look forward to being a much more visible competitor in the 
Coachella Valley. 
Over the past nearly 20 years, we’ve largely abstained from 
engaging in acquisition activities, following a period when 
we were very active. The reasons we slowed our acquisition 
activities were threefold:
GROWTH THROUGH 
ACQUISITIONS
•	
Following the Financial Crisis and Great Recession, 
short-term interest rates were very close to zero for a 
prolonged period, and the industry was awash with 
liquidity, rendering the value of core deposits, and the 
desirability of acquiring them, quite low.
•	
Many, if not most, of the larger community banks and 
smaller mid-size banks that might have otherwise 
been attractive to us had excessive concentrations of 
commercial real estate exposure. Given the fact that 
we were already constraining the pace of commercial 
real estate loan growth relative to the rest of our port­
folio, it didn’t make sense to pay a premium for loan 
portfolios that would have exceeded our appetite. 

14
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
product capabilities that are lacking at one of the partners 
to the transaction, or when they enable a bank to improve 
internal economies of scale. It is generally true, for example, 
that while absolute size doesn’t necessarily lead to greater 
profitability, having larger average deposit totals per branch 
— something that can be accelerated through branch 
consolidations in an acquisition — usually does lead to 
such a result. 
We live in a time when the industry is likely to see more 
consolidation, and especially among the remaining several 
thousand community banks in the United States. Should we 
engage in such activity (something a long-ago Economist 
magazine cover impishly labeled “mergers and impositions”), 
it won’t be because we’re fond of sheer size, but rather out 
of a desire to build an organization that prizes long-term 
client relationships and a granular and highly profitable 
deposit base.
•	
We were, as noted, highly focused internally on 
strengthening the operational and systems founda­
tions of the bank. Any material merger and acquisition 
activity would have been a significant distraction to 
teams working on these internal projects. 
With core deposits much more valuable — both in generat­
ing revenue as well as providing stability — in the present 
(and I expect future) environment, and with our major 
systems work behind us, we’re now in a better position to 
consider growth through acquisition. We are not, however, of 
a mindset that believes acquisitions are necessary for profit­
ability or growth. 
I’ve only once been to a greyhound race, years ago. But I 
remember being intrigued by how the mechanical rabbit 
being pursued by the dogs was engineered to stay just 
ahead of the greyhounds pursuing it. It was tantalizingly 
uncatchable, ensuring that the dogs’ attention was riveted 
on the prize that was always just beyond reach.
 
Many acquisitive bankers fall into this same trap, often justi­
fying the next deal by some notion that a little more size will 
solve all their problems. History shows that just as often, the 
deal creates more problems than it solves. As I noted in last 
year’s letter, with charts and numbers, size hasn’t proven to 
be the solution to profitability in the industry. 
At the same time, acquisitions can make strategic sense 
when, for instance, the deal allows for the extension of 
TOTAL COST OF DEPOSITS
At December 31, 2024
1.50%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
0.50%
3.00%
2.50%
ZION
Peer Strongest Quartile
Peer Weakest Quartile
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

15
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
“For 34 years, the Amegy team has contributed more than $11.3 million and countless 
volunteer hours from all levels of the organization to United Way of Greater Houston.
Amegy Bank is a true champion for our 
community, helping families and individuals 
gain the financial foothold they need to thrive."
Amanda McMillian  |  President and Chief Executive Officer
United Way of Greater Houston 

16
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
16
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
We have a new era upon us also in the form of major 
changes in the leadership at the federal banking regulatory 
agencies, and of course with a new Republican Congress and 
Administration that might be expected to generally be more 
hospitable to the traditional commercial banking industry.
Years ago, an experienced bank lawyer at a Washington, 
D.C. firm suggested to me that the Senate Banking Commit­
tee and the House Financial Services Committee attract 
members, particularly on the Democratic side of the aisle, 
who tend to be more liberal than others in the same party. 
His premise was that these committees oversee not only the 
financial system, but also government policy and programs 
pertaining to housing issues — something that’s particularly 
important in urban areas where poverty and attendant social 
issues are more pronounced and that tend to vote for more 
liberal candidates. 
Whether true or not, it’s certainly been the case that the 
deluge of rules, guidelines, and regulation-by-supervision 
that have come out of Washington in recent years — often 
overreaching or totally unfocused on the fundamental safety 
and soundness of the industry — has seemed excessive and 
bent toward achieving social goals at the cost of allowing the 
market to operate freely. Traditionally, major new laws and 
regulations have followed in the wake of severe dislocations 
in the economy or in the industry. What’s been notable about 
the onslaught of new regulations in recent years is that they 
have not, by and large, been precipitated by such stresses, or 
at least they have largely not been focused on dealing with 
the root causes of events such as the failure of Silicon Valley 
Bank, et al. 
REGULATORY 
REFORM
"The new partnership with The Commerce 
Bank has significantly benefited the YMCA. 
By streamlining our debt and refinancing most 
loans, we've improved our immediate cash flow 
and simplified loan administration. This partner­
ship has not only enhanced our financial stabili­
ty but also fostered a supportive relationship.
The Commerce Bank team 
is genuinely invested in 
the YMCA, offering sup­
port through philanthropy, 
volunteer opportunities and 
special events."
Mai Nguyen  |  CFO/COO
YMCA of Greater Seattle

17
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
At the same time, the major banking industry trade associ­
ations, emboldened by last year’s Supreme Court decision 
ending “Chevron deference” — a 40-year practice whereby 
courts deferred to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambig­
uous laws — have become much bolder in challenging some 
of these regulations in court. In recent months, for example, 
the American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute 
and others have challenged the Federal Reserve’s opaque 
Stress Testing framework; the Consumer Financial Protec­
tion Bureau’s (CFPB) Overdraft Final Rule; the CFPB’s Open 
Banking rule; and the joint rulemaking from federal regu­
lators with respect to the Community Reinvestment Act. 
Others have similarly filed lawsuits against the Securities 
and Exchange Commission over some of their recent rules. 
Litigation has become almost fashionable: last year former 
Federal Reserve Vice-Chairman Randy Quarles said of such 
litigation, “suing a federal agency isn’t a declaration of war. In 
my opinion it’s more like consulting the dictionary in a game 
of Scrabble.” 
Much of the challenge of complying with a dizzying array of 
new rules is found in the sheer complexity of reengineering 
systems, policies and processes across an organization to 
ensure compliance. With only 24 hours in a day, and limited 
budgets, innovations and customer-focused activities can 
all-too-quickly be subordinated to non-discretionary new 
regulatory requirements. The sentiment of many in the 
industry is that they’re simply worn out by the pace of what 
has sometimes seemed like senseless change. Whatever 
one thinks of the new administration in Washington, most 
bankers will enjoy being able to pivot back to a focus on 
our own priorities — priorities that usually focus on better 
serving customers. 
The excessive and growing regulation found in banking is 
certainly one of the primary reasons we’ve seen staggering 
growth in private credit markets in recent years — a market 
of over $2 trillion in size by most estimates and growing 
much more quickly than traditional bank assets. Given the 
funding cost advantages banks have — with federally-in­
sured deposits constituting a substantial portion of total 
funding sources — it’s logical to conclude that private credit is 
growing because of weaker terms, fewer covenants, thinner 
capitalization, or a combination of these factors. McKinsey 
& Company pegs the addressable market for private credit 
at some $30 trillion. This fundamentally unregulated sector 
of the financial services industry poses increasing risk to 
our economy and to the financial system. Though inves­
tors are usually required to lock up their funds for five to 
10 years, there will be a day of reckoning, especially if this 
sector continues to grow as rapidly as it has in recent years. 
Thoughtful policy would attempt to create conditions condu­
cive to carrying more of these assets on bank balance sheets, 
with the attendant regulation of safety and soundness, and 
access to central bank liquidity facilities. 
With the creation of President Trump’s Department of 
Government Efficiency (DOGE), some have speculated that 
the time may be ripe for streamlining the Rube Goldberg 
contraption that is the federal banking regulatory framework. 
If anyone at DOGE is taking notes, my vote would be to have 
the Federal Reserve System focus solely on monetary policy; 
to have the FDIC responsible for all federal deposit insurance 
and resolution activities; and have the Office of the Comp­
troller of the Currency responsible for all federal examination 
and supervision activities. The National Credit Union Admin­
istration should be disbanded, with its activities folded into 
the FDIC and OCC, as was done years ago with the Office of 
Thrift Supervision and the Federal Savings and Loan Insur­
ance Corporation. 
Such a redistribution of responsibilities would bring the tradi­
tional strengths of each agency to the fore.  The savings 
would be substantial, and the focus and greater consistency 
it would bring in overseeing banks and other insured deposi­
tory institutions could only be helpful.

18
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
Probably the most urgently needed reform pertains to federal 
deposit insurance. Since the insurance limit was raised to 
$250,000 in July 2010, inflation has eroded the real value of 
deposit insurance such that its buying power today is only 
$172,000 — a 31% decrease and shrinking further each year.
  
Truth be told, the deposits at the nation’s largest banks 
have been demonstrated to be fully insured, de facto, due 
to the systemic risk posed by the collapse of a large insti­
tution. When Silicon Valley Bank failed in March 2023, its 
total deposits were about $175 billion. Today, the deposits 
of all U.S. banks with over $200 billion in assets amount to 
66.5% of the industry’s total deposits. As we’ve seen, and 
as the market intuitively knows, these deposits are implicitly 
insured by the federal government. The insured deposits of 
the remaining banks with assets of less than $200 billion 
constitute 21.9% of the industry’s total deposits. These 
explicitly insured deposits, combined with the system’s 
implicitly insured deposits, thus constitute 88.4% of total 
banking industry deposits. The remaining 11.6% or so — 
by any definition a relatively small portion of the total — is 
where all the volatility arises during times of stress, as larger 
uninsured depositors in the smaller banks move funds to the 
largest implicitly insured banks. It’s truly a case of the tail 
wagging the dog.
Furthermore, the migration of large deposits to “too-big-
to-fail” banks — something that could be largely mitigated 
through insurance reform — results in a greater concentration 
of deposits, and thus risk, in a handful of institutions. Insuring 
all bank deposits would bring stability and a much more level 
playing field to the industry. It would encourage more new 
bank startups, and any incremental “moral hazard” would 
be small relative to any perceived to exist today. (I’ve long 
believed that “moral hazard” is much more imagined than 
real, and especially when management teams have a signif­
icant sum of their own money invested in the business, as is 
so often the case in smaller banks). 
This is an easily solvable problem, if there’s such a thing 
with any problem that requires Congressional action. The 
solution would dramatically reduce liquidity risk and improve 
consumer confidence in times of crisis. 
DEPOSIT 
INSURANCE 
REFORM

19
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
"Thank you to California Bank & Trust for partnering to make our 
communities more resilient, especially during times of crisis. With 
California Bank & Trust’s generous donation, the American Red Cross, 
alongside our partners, is able to support families who experienced 
the heartbreaking devastation from the Los Angeles wildfires, 
bringing relief, resources, and a sense of 
hope to those who need it most.” 
Sean Mahoney  |  Regional Chief Executive Officer
American Red Cross Southern California Region

20
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
We find ourselves also at the dawn of a new era in which 
artificial intelligence, or AI, will play a rapidly increasing role 
in business, and in our lives. The release of ChatGPT to the 
public on November 30, 2022, introduced a new technol­
ogy that promises to revolutionize much of the world’s work, 
including that done by knowledge workers — people who 
create value through their ability to think analytically and 
who use their expertise and wisdom to solve problems. The 
amount of investment, and the pace of change in producing 
more powerful models, is staggering. 
Like most all other organizations, we’re investigating and 
experimenting with Generative AI use cases that will help 
deter and discover fraud, eliminate rote work and create 
better customer experiences. While AI has enormous poten­
tial, it also has limitations. Generative AI has challenges with 
explainability and “hallucinations.” We’re in the early innings, 
and progress will likely come quickly. 
Some posit that “Agentic AI’s” will create personal assis­
tants that will so optimize consumers’ lives that industries 
like banking will experience severe margin erosion. No doubt 
we’ll continue to see advances that will fundamentally 
change our industry, and people’s lives. At the same time, 
I think back to the enactment of the Depository Institutions 
Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, which 
among other things phased out “Regulation Q,” which had 
capped the interest rates banks could pay on deposits and 
led to the creation of money market accounts that have 
become a staple of most banks’ funding. 
I wouldn’t have believed, when Reg Q was set on its path 
to repeal, that Zions Bancorporation’s proportion of noninter­
est-bearing deposits, which in 1980 constituted about 25% 
of total deposits, would, 45 years later, be 33% of deposits. 
I also think back to a lesson I learned from a business school 
professor many years ago, as we were discussing a case 
study involving a well-known consumer product. As an 
economics major, I suggested that if consumers behaved 
rationally, they wouldn’t buy the product, which was more 
expensive than its generic alternative. The professor looked 
at me and asked whether I brushed my teeth with baking 
soda. I replied, of course, that I did not. He said, “If you were 
rational, you would.” 
Markets are amazingly good at sorting through change and 
ensuring that business and pricing models adapt to new 
technologies and evolving customer behaviors. I believe that 
AI will be but one more advancement that provides value for 
LOOKING TO 
THE FUTURE

21
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
customers while making us more efficient at serving them, 
and that personal relationships and solutions provided by 
trusted advisors and trusted brands will long be of value to 
them. Well-run banks focused on doing all they can to help 
their customers succeed will be here for a very long time.
On behalf of the nearly ten thousand talented people with 
whom I have the privilege of working every day, I want to 
thank you for your support and for your investment. As one 
who has the great majority of my own net worth invested in 
Zions Bancorporation’s future, I both appreciate that support, 
and along with our team I’m committed to doing everything I 
can to deliver value for all of us as investors, as well as to our 
customers, our employees, and the communities in which we 
live and work. 
Respectfully,
Harris Simmons
Chairman and CEO
February 12, 2025

22
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS1
(Figures in millions, except per share amounts)
2024/2023
Change
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
For the Year
%
Net interest income
-
$    2,430
$    2,438
$    2,520
$    2,208
$    2,216
Noninterest income
+3
700
677
632
703
574
Total net revenue
-
3,130
3,115
3,152
2,911
2,790
Provision for credit losses
-45
72
132
122
(276)
414
Noninterest expense
-2
2,046
2,097
1,878
1,741
1,704
Adjusted pre-provision net revenue1
-3
 1,131 
 1,171 
 1,312 
 1,121 
 1,144 
Net income
+15
784
680
907
1,129
539
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders
+14
737
648
878
1,097
505
Per Common Share
Net earnings - diluted
+14
4.95
4.35
5.79
6.79
3.02
Tangible book value at year-end
+20
33.85
28.30
22.79
39.62
38.42
Market price - end
+24
54.25
43.87
49.16
63.16
43.44
Market price - high
+15
63.22
55.20
75.44
68.25
52.48
Market price - low
+107
37.76
18.26
45.21
42.12
23.58
At Year End
Assets
+2
88,775
87,203
89,545
93,200
81,479
Loans and leases, net of unearned income and fees
+3
59,410
57,779
55,653
50,851
53,476
Deposits
+2
76,223
74,961
71,652
82,789
69,653
Common equity
+15
6,058
5,251
4,453
7,023
7,320
Performance Ratios
%
%
%
%
%
Return on average assets
0.88
0.77
1.01
1.29
0.71
Return on average common equity
13.1
13.4
16.0
14.9
7.2
Return on average tangible common equity1
16.2
17.3
19.8
17.3
8.4
Net interest margin
3.00
3.02
3.06
2.72
3.15
Net charge-offs to average loans and leases
0.10
0.06
0.07
0.01
0.22
Total allowance for credit losses to loans and leases outstanding
1.25
1.26
1.14
1.09
1.56
Capital Ratios at Year End
%
%
%
%
%
Common equity tier 1 capital
10.9
10.3
9.8
10.2
10.8
Tier 1 leverage
8.3
8.3
7.7
7.2
8.3
Tangible common equity to tangible assets
5.7
4.9
3.8
6.5
7.8
Other Selected Information
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
-
147.2
147.8
150.3
160.2
165.6
Dividends declared, per share
+1
1.66
1.64
1.58
1.44
1.36
Common dividend payout ratio2
33.6%
37.8%
27.3%
21.1%
44.6%
Capital distributed as a percentage of net earnings applicable to common 
shareholders3
38%
46%
50%
94%
59%
Efficiency ratio1
64.2%
62.9%
58.8%
60.8%
59.4%
1This table includes certain non-GAAP measures. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 23 for more information.
²The common dividend payout ratio is equal to common dividends paid divided by net earnings applicable to common shareholders.
3This ratio is the sum of the dollars of common dividends paid and dollars used for share repurchases for the year, divided by net earnings applicable to common shareholders.

23
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
(Figures in millions, except per share amounts)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Pre-Provision Net Revenue (PPNR)
(a)
Total noninterest expense (GAAP)
$    2,046
$    2,097
$    1,878
$    1,741
$    1,704
LESS adjustments:
Severance costs
3
14
1
1
1
Other real estate expense, net
(1)
-
1
-
1
Amortization of core deposit and other tangibles
7
6
1
1
-
Restructuring costs
-
1
-
-
1
Pension termination-related expense (income)
-
-
-
(5)
28
SBIC investment success fee accrual
1
-
(1)
7
-
FDIC special assessment
11
90
-
-
-
(b)
Total adjustments
21
111
2
4
31
(a-b)=(c)
Adjusted noninterest expense (non-GAAP)
2,025
1,986
1,876
1,737
1,673
(d)
Net interest income (GAAP)
2,430
2,438
2,520
2,208
2,216
(e)
Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments
45
41
37
32
28
(d+e)=(f)
Taxable-equivalent net interest income (non-GAAP)
2,475
2,479
2,557
2,240
2,244
(g)
Noninterest Income (GAAP)
700
677
632
703
574
(f+g)=(h)
Combined Income (non-GAAP)
3,175
3,156
3,189
2,943
2,818
LESS Adjustments:
Fair value and nonhedge derivative gain (loss)
-
(4)
16
14
(6)
Securities gains (losses), net
19
4
(15)
71
7
(i)
Total adjustments
19
-
1
85
1
(h-i)=(j)
Adjusted taxable-equivalent revenue (non-GAAP)
3,156
3,156
3,188
2,858
2,817
(j-c)
Adjusted pre-provision net revenue (PPNR)
1,131
1,170
1,312
1,121
1,144
(c)/(j)
Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP)
64.2%
62.9%
58.8%
60.8%
59.4%
Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders (GAAP)
$       737
$       648
$       878
$    1,097
$       505
Adjustments, net of tax:
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles
7
5
1
1
-
(a)
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders, excluding the 
effects of the adjustments, net of tax (non-GAAP)
$       744
$       653
$       879
$    1,098
$       505
Average common equity (GAAP)
5,630
4,839
5,472
7,371
7,050
Average goodwill and intangibles
(1,055)
(1,062)
(1,022)
(1,015)
(1,015)
(b)
Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
$    4,575
$    3,777
$    4,450
$    6,356
$    6,035
(a/b)
Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
16.3%
17.3%
19.8%
17.3%
8.4%
Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
(a)
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders, excluding the 
effects of the adjustments, net of tax (non-GAAP)
$       744
$       653
$       879
$    1,098
$       505
Adjustments:
Provision for credit losses
72
132
122
(276)
414
Net Charge-offs
(60)
(36)
(39)
(6)
(105)
Securities Gains/Losses
(19)
(4)
15
(71)
(6)
Tax impact of adjustments
1
(19)
(21)
74
(64)
(c)
Total Adjustments
(6)
73
77
(279)
239
(a+c)=(d)
Adjusted net earnings to common shareholders
$       738
$       726
$       956
$       819
$       744
(d/b)
Adjusted Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
16.1%
19.2%
21.5%
12.9%
12.3%

24
Z I O N S  B A N C O R P O R A T I O N
ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ZIONS’ PEER GROUP
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTS
BOKF	
BOK Financial Corp
CADE	
Cadence Bank
CFG	
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
CFR	
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
CMA	
Comerica Incorporated
COLB	
Columbia Banking System
EWBC	
East West Bancorp, Inc
FHN	
First Horizon National Corporation
FITB	
Fifth Third Bancorp
HBAN	
Huntington Bancshares 	
	
	
  Incorporated
KEY	
KeyCorp
MTB	
M&T Bank Corporation
PNFP	
Pinnacle Financial Partners
RF	
Regions Financial Corporation
SNV	
Synovus Financial Corp.
WAL	
Western Alliance 	
	
	
	
  Bancorporation
WBS	
Webster Bank
WTFC	
Wintrust Financial Corp.
Bruce K. Alexander 
CEO, Vectra Bank Colorado
Paul E. Burdiss 
CEO, Zions Bank
Kenneth J. Collins 
Chief Transformation Officer
Eric Ellingsen 
CEO, California Bank & Trust
Alan M. Forney 
CEO, The Commerce Bank of Washington 
Olga T. Hoff 
Retail Banking
Christopher Kyriakakis 
Chief Risk Officer
Scott A. Law 
Chief Human Resources Officer
Eric Lucero 
Chief Marketing Officer
Michael MacDonald 
Capital Markets
Rena Miller 
General Counsel
R. Ryan Richards 
Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca K. Robinson 
Wealth Management
Terry A. Shirey 
CEO, Nevada State Bank
Jennifer A. Smith 
Chief Technology and Operations Officer
Mark Stebbings 
CEO, National Bank of Arizona
Steven D. Stephens 
CEO, Amegy Bank
Harris H. Simmons 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Zions Bancorporation
Maria Contreras-Sweet 
Managing Member 
Contreras Sweet Companies 
Rockway Equity Partners
Gary L. Crittenden 
Private Investor
Suren K. Gupta 
President 
Allstate Protection and Enterprise Services
Claire A. Huang 
Former Chief Marketing Officer 
J.P. Morgan Chase and Company
Vivian S. Lee 
Executive Fellow 
Harvard Business School
Scott J. McLean 
President and Chief Operating Officer 
Zions Bancorporation
Edward F. Murphy 
Former Chief Financial Officer 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Stephen D. Quinn 
Former Managing Director and General Partner 
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Aaron B. Skonnard 
Chief Executive Officer 
Pluralsight, Inc.
Barbara A. Yastine 
Former Chair, President and 
Chief Executive Officer 
Ally Bank
CORPORATE OFFICERS
Harris H. Simmons 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Scott J. McLean 
President and Chief Operating Officer
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTS
(CONTINUED)
Derek Steward 
Chief Credit Officer
Randy R. Stewart 
Mortgage Lending 
Lincoln Taylor 
Chief Audit Executive

25
A N N U A L  R E P O R T   |   2 0 2 4
ZIONS BANCORPORATION
NEWS RELEASES
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
One South Main Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109
801-844-7637
Our news releases are available on our 
website at zionsbancorporation.com. To be 
added to the email distribution list, please 
visit zionsbancorporation.com and click on 
“Email Notifications.”
CORPORATE INFORMATION
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
Shareholders can reinvest their cash dividends 
in additional shares of our common stock at 
the market price on the dividend payment 
date. Shareholders, as well as brokers and 
custodians who hold our common stock for 
clients, can obtain a prospectus of the plan 
on 
the 
Zions 
Bancorporation 
website 
at 
zionsbancorporation.com or by writing to:
Zions Bancorporation
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
P.O. Box 30880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84130-0880
ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS’  
MEETING
May 2, 2025, 1 p.m. MDT
Zions Bancorporation 
Founders Room, 18th Floor
One South Main Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84133
TRANSFER AGENT
Zions Bank
Corporate Trust Department
One South Main Street, 12th Floor
Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109
801-844-7545 or 888-416-5176
CREDIT RATINGS
Credit ratings are updated regularly and may be 
found on the Zions Bancorporation website at 
zionsbancorporation.com.
REGISTRAR
Zions Bank
One South Main Street, 12th Floor
Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109
AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
15 W. South Temple
Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
OTHER LISTED SECURITIES
Series A Preferred Stock – NASDAQ: ZIONP
NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT
MARKET SYMBOL
ZION
In addition to this report, please see our 
website zionsbancorporation.com for 
our Form 10-K, proxy, and corporate 
responsibility report.
INTERNET SITES
Zions Bancorporation 
zionsbancorporation.com
Zions Bank 
zionsbank.com
California Bank & Trust 
calbanktrust.com
Amegy Bank 
amegybank.com
National Bank of Arizona 
nbarizona.com
Nevada State Bank 
nsbank.com
Vectra Bank Colorado 
vectrabank.com
The Commerce Bank of Washington 
tcbwa.com
The Commerce Bank of Oregon 
tcboregon.com
This document may contain statements that could be considered “forward looking.” Readers should review the forward-looking statement disclaimer of 
Zions’ Annual Report on Form 10-K, which can be found on the website at zionsbancorporation.com and applies equally to this document. Certain financial 
measures containing descriptive words such as “core” or “adjusted” are subject to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures table, which can be found on page 23. 
SELECTED INDEX MEMBERSHIPS
S&P Midcap 400
S&P 1000
KBW Bank
NASDAQ Financial 100
INVESTOR RELATIONS
For financial information about the bank,
analysts, investors and news media
representatives should contact:
Shannon Drage
801-844-7637
investor@zionsbancorp.com

O N E  S O U T H  M A I N  ST R E ET,  S A LT  LA K E  C I T Y,  U TA H  8 4 1 3 3   |  Z I O N S BA N CO R PO RAT I O N .CO M