Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / AfriTin Mining

AfriTin Mining

atm · LSE Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker atm
Exchange LSE
Sector Basic Materials
Industry
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2021 Annual Report · AfriTin Mining
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2021 ANNUAL
REPORT

1

CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT .................................................................................................................................

5 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S STATEMENT ...............................................................................................

7 

FINANCIAL REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................

11 

DIRECTORS’ REPORT ..........................................................................................................................................

15 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT .........................................................................................................

23 

STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................

31 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT .............................................................................................................

33 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ..........................................................

42 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION ....................................................................

43 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY ......................................................................

44 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS .....................................................................................

46 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ..............................................................

47 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING .................................................................................................

85 

COMPANY INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................

89

TABLE OF
CONTENTS

2

  GLEN PARSONS
  CHAIRMAN

In reviewing our financial year, I first want to thank AfriTin’s staff, shareholders and broader stakeholder 
groups for their continued support of and belief in this Company. No corner of the globe has escaped the 
COVID-19 pandemic during this period, and we are particularly appreciative of our staff’s efforts during 
these difficult and testing times. 

Given  this  backdrop,  what  we  have  achieved  this  year  as  a  Company  has  been  all  the  more  admirable. 
I  would  like  to  congratulate  the  AfriTin  Mining  team  for  their  cohesive  efforts  on  behalf  of  those  same 
stakeholders  and  the  non-executive  directors.  Despite  the  challenges  of  2020,  the  Company  has  had  a 
transformative  year  at  the  Uis  Tin  Mine,  as  demonstrated  by  the  achievements  and  ramp-up  of  the  Uis 
Phase 1 pilot plant.

To ramp up production and surpass nameplate production capacity is a testament to the hard work carried 
out on site, and to the team’s resolve and determination to deliver. 

Since November 2020, Uis continues to grow total monthly production which has exceeded the planned 
production of 60 tonnes of tin concentrate per month.

Having achieved the tin production goals of the Uis Phase 1 pilot plant, the senior management team, led 
by Anthony Viljoen, is now focussed on a number of key initiatives:
•  The expansion of Phase 1 to increase production to 120 tonnes of concentrate per month;
•  Exploration work to potentially increase Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves;
•  Fast tracking test work to assess the potential of unlocking two additional by-product revenue streams, 

namely lithium and tantalum.

These are exciting developments for AfriTin, and we look forward to seeing the results of the test work and 
providing further updates.

The  safety  of  all  our  staff  remains  a  priority  for  the  Company.  We  continue  to  implement  the  strictest 
measures to combat the pandemic and protect our employees, while also supporting the communities in 
which they live.

The Company continues to successfully transition from developer to producer, which can only be achieved 
through  the  focus  and  dedication  of  our  team,  management,  my  fellow  directors,  and  of  course,  our 
shareholders, all of whom I thank. 

We have built an excellent platform to continue our growth story, and I look forward to our future.

GLEN PARSONS

Chairman

21 July 2021

CHAIRMAN’S 
STATEMENT

4

5

  ANTHONY VILJOEN
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

The year under review has been transformative for AfriTin Mining, especially at our flagship Uis Tin Mine in 
Namibia. These achievements are even more impressive given the immense challenges that everyone has 
faced as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic. 

After navigating these difficult circumstances, the financial year culminated in the Company announcing 
the first material revenue numbers from the mine of £5m. Total production for the year amounted to 473t 
of tin concentrate (311.7t of contained tin metal). This is a monumental first step and we believe it’s just a 
precursor of what is to ensue as the plant cost base becomes more efficient and the expansion plans are 
implemented. The post balance sheet date equity raise also allowed for the extinguishing of all the loan 
note  obligations,  providing  a  robust  balance  sheet  for  the  next  growth  phase  of  the  Company.  We  are 
incredibly proud of our team for efficiently accomplishing this ramp-up in production, while maintaining 
an exemplary safety record. This basis from which AfriTin will grow underpins our ambition of becoming a 
significant multi-commodity tech metals producer out of Africa.

The  historical  mining  heritage  of  the  Erongo  province  resided  primarily  in  its  tin  production  with  no 
meaningful uses for lithium and tantalum. Forty years on since the mine closure, tin has become a new 
technology metal and the demand for lithium and tantalum has transformed the economics of the historical 
operation.  We  believe  this  province  will  become  a  globally  significant  metallogenic  province  for  new 
technology metals, allowing for increased revenues and economies of scale within AfriTin’s licence areas.

Despite challenges resulting in project delays, AfriTin’s production has come on stream at a time when tin 
prices have reached highs that have not been seen in the last decade. This is mainly due to an increase in 
demand  from  new  technologies,  especially  electric  vehicles  and  semi-conductors,  at  a  time  when  there 
have been supply issues that are likely to persist after decades of underspending on exploration and mine 
development. The lithium market has matched this buoyancy and AfriTin is well placed to take advantage 
of this growth phase. The Uis JORC (2012) resource of 95 539t of tin, 6 091t of tantalum and 450 265t of 
lithium oxide establishes a globally significant resource from the currently exploited V1 and V2 pegmatites.

We are now planning to grow the Company’s revenue streams by expanding the throughput of the pilot 
plant  and  introducing  tantalum  and  lithium  by-product  revenue  streams.  The  metallurgical  test  work  to 
develop the process design has been a key priority to unlocking the significant potential of AfriTin. 

In  December  2020,  it  was  a  pleasure  to  confirm  that  the  Company’s  existing  offtake  partner,  Thaisarco, 
renewed  and  extended  its  tin  concentrate  offtake  agreement  for  three  years.  This  deal  further  cements 
the  Company’s  future  and  allows  us  to  supply  what  has  become  a  highly  demanded  product.  We  were 
also delighted to conclude a maiden tantalum concentrate offtake agreement with AfriMet Resources AG, 
demonstrating the commercial viability of AfriTin’s plans. We believe these deals are substantive votes of 
confidence in AfriTin, its strategy, and its vision, from two leaders in the global and African metal markets.

In an attempt to direct all of the Company’s attention to the investment-friendly jurisdiction of Namibia, 
and  to  unlocking  the  metallogenic  jewel  that  is  the  Erongo  region,  a  decision  was  made  to  relinquish 
and impair the Company’s South African asset base. Namibia continues to be an incredibly gracious host 
country within which to conduct business. An overarching theme in all decisions and corporate strategy is 
the safety, health and wellbeing of all our employees and the people in the surrounding communities where 
we operate. We remain sensitive to the environment and its people and are committed to mitigating the 
impact of our operations. This philosophy will continue to be built into our corporate DNA as we strive to 
become the new technology metals champion of Africa.

CHIEF
EXECUTIVE
OFFICER’S
STATEMENT

6

7

POST-PERIOD ACTIVITIES 

Subsequent to the period under review, we reached two further significant milestones: publication of the 
Definitive Feasibility Study for Phase 1 (“DFS”) and declaration of a JORC (2012) Ore Reserve estimate over 
the V1 and V2 pegmatites. The robust economics of the DFS provide us with an opportunity to increase 
the revenue and profit margin of the current operation, while importantly de-risking the expansion of the 
project into the much larger Phase 2 operation. 

In  addition  to  the  above,  on  12  May  2021  the  Company  announced  the  placing  of  216  666  667  ordinary 
shares  to  raise  £13m  (before  expenses).  This  puts  the  Company  into  a  position  to  expedite  the  Phase  1 
expansion of our flagship Uis Tin Mine and develop the inherent value of our Namibian licence portfolio 
through the unlocking of its metallurgy and exploration potential. This includes further test work on the 
lithium and tantalum by-product potential. 

I would like to congratulate and thank our management teams, staff, and stakeholders for their outstanding 
efforts  and  continued  support  in  what  has  been  a  challenging  time  globally.  In  addition  to  this,  I  would 
like to thank the Board of Directors for their guidance and advice over the past year. We are committed 
to  expanding  and  developing  Uis  and  our  other  Namibian  exploration  assets  as  we  look  to  become  a 
significant African multi-commodity tech metals producer. I look forward to updating the market on our 
progress.

This report was approved by the Board of Directors on 21 July 2021.

ANTHONY VILJOEN

Chief Executive Officer

21 July 2021

8

9

  ROBERT SEWELL
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I am pleased to report the Company’s first notable annual revenue of £5m from the sale of tin concentrate. 
This  was  achieved  by  ramping  up  the  Uis  operation  to  commercial  production  from  March  through  to 
November 2020 producing 473t of tin concentrate during the financial year (311.7t of contained tin metal). 

With  our  flagship  asset,  the  Uis  Tin  Mine,  transitioning  from  a  developing  to  a  producing  operation, 
administrative expenses across the Group increased to £2.540m for the year (in comparison to £1.815m 
incurred in the previous financial year, ending 29 February 2020 (“2020”)). Furthermore, the increase is as 
a result of an increase in salaries and head count given the growth phase of the business and a discretionary 
bonus awarded to senior management in January 2021 settled through the issue of shares. 

A decision was made to relinquish and impair the Company’s South African exploration asset base resulting 
in an impairment charge of £3.069m during the financial year under review.

The increase in finance cost for the year to £0.184m (2020: £0.041m) is mainly due to interest on Nedbank 
facilities  no  longer  being  capitalised  to  the  mining  asset  subsequent  to  the  achievement  of  commercial 
production at Uis on 1 December 2020. 

The Group’s loss for the year totalled £5.796m (2020: £1.830m). This loss includes an impairment charge 
of £3.069m, as detailed above. 

A basic loss per share from operations of 0.76 pence was recorded (2020: 0.29 pence loss per share).

Expenditure  amounting  to  £0.978m  (2020:  £0.522m)  was  capitalised  to  the  intangible  exploration  and 
evaluation asset. This included costs relating to the Definitive Feasibility Study for the expansion of the 
Phase 1 mining and processing facility which was finalised and announced in May 2021, costs relating to the 
conversion of the JORC (2012) Mineral Resource estimate into an initial JORC (2012) Proved and Probable 
Ore Reserve estimate, as well as costs relating to additional exploration and evaluation work.

Capital expenditure relating to the mining asset under construction amounted to £2.028m during FY2021 
(2020:  £7.370m).  Included  in  this  amount  is  £0.418m  relating  to  capitalised  ramp  up  costs  at  the  Uis 
operation and £0.842m relating to upgrades to improve plant availability, utilisation and recoveries. The 
remainder of the capitalised expenditure related to project team salary and travel costs and finance costs 
capitalised  to  the  mining  asset  under  construction.  Upon  reaching  commercial  production,  the  mining 
asset under construction of £13.550m was transferred to the mining asset. Mining asset additions totalled 
£0.124m and depreciation of the mining asset amounted to £0.718m.

As at 28 February 2021, the Group had cash in the bank amounting to £1.351m (2020: £0.575m) with the 
primary  movements  reflecting  cash  used  in  operations  totalling  £1.501m  (mainly  the  result  of  operating 
costs  incurred  and  changes  in  working  capital),  investing  cash  outflows  of  £2.955m  (mainly  due  to  the 
capital expenditure detailed above), and £5.160m of financing cash inflows.

The Nedbank working capital facility was successfully renewed and increased to N$43m (c. £2.038m) in 
July 2020. Furthermore, Nedbank continued to provide a bank guarantee letter in favour of Namibia Power 
Corporation Pty Limited for an amount of N$4.118m (c. £0.195m) in relation to a deposit for the supply of 
electrical power to the Uis operations. At 28 February 2021, N$36m (c. £1.7m) had been drawn down on 
this facility. The facility is due for annual review in July 2021, and discussions are currently underway with 
the lender to secure the rollover of the facility. The remaining significant financing cash inflows relate to 
£2.05m raised through loan notes in May 2020 and an equity raise in August 2020 as detailed below. The 
loan notes matured and were settled post year-end in May 2021.

The inventory balance increased to £0.997m (2020: £0.247m) as a result of the operations at the Uis Tin 

FINANCIAL
REVIEW

10

11

Mine reaching commercial production, and £0.373m (2020: £0.185m) of tin concentrate (36 tonnes) being 
on hand and ready for shipment at year-end (these have subsequently been shipped). 

Trade receivables increased to £0.717m at year end (2020: £0.043m). Contributing to the increase was an 
increase in shipments in transit as a result of the higher production rates achieved during the last quarter 
of the financial year, as well as a fair value adjustment that was passed to reprice the shipments in transit 
in accordance with the requirements of IFRS. All trade receivables relating to the sale of tin concentrate 
at year end have been subsequently settled by our valued offtake partner, Thailand Smelting and Refining 
Company (Thaisarco).

The  movement  in  the  share  capital  balance  for  the  financial  year  under  review  is  accounted  for  by  net 
proceeds  from  an  equity  raise  in  August  2020  of  £2.797m,  the  conversion  of  £1.6m  of  the  convertible 
loan notes held by AfriMet Resources AG, and the issue of shares to employees, directors and suppliers of 
£0.724m.

Share-based payment charges relating to the share option scheme amounting to £0.175m (2020: £0.365m), 
as well as a charge of £0.107m (2020: £0.038m) relating to shares to be issued to directors, employees and 
suppliers in lieu of salaries/fees, were recognised in the share-based payment reserve during the financial 
year.

Trade  and  other  payables  increased  to  £1.484m  (2020:  £0.895m)  as  a  result  of  Uis  becoming  a  fully-
fledged operation running at commercial production levels at year-end.

FUNDING

Subsequent to year-end, on 12 May 2021, an equity placing raised £13m gross proceeds.

Furthermore, the remaining 2019 convertible loan notes and the 2020 loan notes were settled on 25 May 
2021. The outstanding convertible loan notes were partially settled through conversion into ordinary shares 
and the remainder settled in cash. The outstanding loan notes were all settled in cash. 

Management and the Board of Directors have considered cash flow forecasts and stress testing of the cash 
flow forecasts contained herein and have concluded that the Company will be able to continue in operation 
for the foreseeable future as a going concern and will be able to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities 
in the normal course of operations. Please refer to Note 2 for further details.

ROBERT SEWELL

Chief Financial Officer

21 July 2021

12

13

The Directors of AfriTin hereby present their report together with the consolidated financial statements for 
the year from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021.

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES, BUSINESS REVIEW AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

The principal activity of the Group (AfriTin and its subsidiaries) is mineral exploration and the development 
of mining and exploration projects in Namibia. A review of the Group’s progress and prospects is given in 
the CEO’s statement in this Annual Report.

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

The Group is subject to a variety of risks, specifically those relating to the mining and exploration industry. 
As an entrepreneurial business operating in commodities and emerging markets, there is clearly an elevated 
risk  which  is  balanced  by  potentially  greater  rewards.  The  Board  is  mindful  of,  and  monitors,  both  its 
corporate risk and individual project risk. Outlined below are the principal risk factors that the Board feels 
may affect performance. The risks detailed below are not exhaustive, and further risks and uncertainties 
may exist which are currently unidentified or considered to be immaterial. The risks are not presented in 
any order of priority. 

Risk and Impact

Mitigation

COVID-19

The countries in which the Group 
operates have all instituted measures 
to limit the spread of COVID-19. The 
Group is following the World Health 
Organisation (WHO) guidelines and 
is complying with the regulations 
of Namibia, South Africa and the 
United Kingdom related to COVID-19. 
In addition, the Group has updated 
its health and safety policies and 
procedures to align with the above 
guidelines and to translate these 
guidelines into workplace-specific 
measures.

The Group has adopted technological 
tools, such as online video 
conferencing and project and team 
management software, to enable 
office-bound staff to work remotely.

COVID-19 resulted in widespread 
socio-economic disruption around the 
world. The countries where the Group 
operates, namely Namibia, South Africa 
and the United Kingdom continue to be 
subject to varying levels of lockdown 
restrictions to contain the spread of 
the disease. Despite lockdowns, the 
Group’s operation in Namibia remained 
open during the course of the reporting 
period (albeit with a temporary 
suspension on mining in April 2020) 
due to an exemption granted to the 
mining industry but did suffer supply-
chain disruptions which delayed 
production ramp-up. The Group’s 
operations are continuing with minimal 
disruption now that the global lockdown 
measures have eased. However, there 
continues to be a risk that lockdown 
measures return in the event of further 
COVID-19 outbreaks, which may result 
in interruptions to operations through 
supply chain disruption, illness amongst 
our workforce and related personnel, 
together with potential volatility in tin, 
tantalum and lithium prices.

In addition to the above, COVID-19 
restrictions have resulted in shipping 
disruptions and congestion at container 
shipping ports. Despite this, the 
shipping of tin concentrate to Thaisarco 
has continued. 

DIRECTORS’
REPORT

14

15

Risk and Impact

Mitigation

Risk and Impact

Mitigation

Volatility of
metal prices 

Foreign 
exchange

Development 
projects

Exploration 
and mining 
risks

Tin, tantalum and lithium prices are 
subject to high levels of volatility and 
are impacted by numerous factors that 
are outside of the control of the Group. 
A low tin, tantalum or lithium price 
as well as commodity demand could 
affect the financial performance of the 
Group and this may affect the ability of 
the Group to fund future growth.

With AfriTin’s operations mainly in 
Namibia and South Africa, but tin sales 
based in US Dollars and equity funding 
based in Pound Sterling, the volatility 
and movement in the Rand/Namibian 
Dollar exchange rate could be a 
significant risk factor to the Group.

Development projects have no 
operating history upon which to base 
estimates of future cash operating 
costs. For development projects, 
estimates of proven and probable 
reserves and cash operating costs 
are, to a large extent, based on the 
interpretation of geological data 
obtained from drillholes and other 
sampling techniques and feasibility 
studies which derive estimates of cash 
operating costs based upon anticipated 
tonnage and grades of ore to be 
mined and processed, as well as the 
configuration of the orebody, expected 
throughput and recovery rates, 
comparable facility and equipment 
operating costs and other factors.

The business of mineral exploration 
involves a high degree of risk. Whilst 
the discovery of a mineral deposit 
may result in substantial rewards, few 
properties at the exploration stage are 
ultimately developed into producing 
mines. 

The operations of the Group may be 
disrupted by a variety of risks and 
hazards which are beyond the control 
of the Group, including geological, 
geotechnical and seismic factors, 
environmental hazards, industrial 
accidents, occupational and health 
hazards, technical failures, labour 

16

The Board and management constantly 
monitor the markets in which the 
Group operates. Long-term financial 
planning is undertaken on a regular 
basis.

The Group holds the majority of its 
funds in major currencies. It attempts 
to match cash held in a particular 
currency to the currency in which 
liabilities are incurred.

The Group has appointed an 
experienced team of geoscientists 
and engineers, complemented by 
experienced consultants in specialist 
areas. Any new capital projects are 
supported by feasibility studies. The 
Uis Phase 1 pilot plant will assist in 
understanding the metallurgy and 
processing elements of the project 
which will provide essential up-front 
information for the implementation of 
Phase 2. 

Exploration projects are carefully 
managed with regular review by the 
Board of progress against targets and 
expenditure. Funds are only expended 
in areas deemed prospective.  

The Group adheres strictly to a health 
and safety programme. When con-
structing a mine site, external geotech-
nical, environmental and geo-hydrolog-
ical consultants are used to ensure all 
potential risks of this nature are under-
stood and mitigation plans are put in 
place. 

Social license 
to operate

disputes, unexpected rock properties, 
explosions, flooding, and extended 
interruptions due to inclement or 
hazardous weather conditions and 
other acts of God.

Past environmental incidents in the 
extractive industry highlight risks such 
as water management, tailings storage 
facilities and other potential hazards to 
both the environment and community 
health and safety.

Capital budget 
overruns

Whilst best estimates are used in 
preparing capital project budgets, 
these budgets are dependent on a 
number of external factors which 
are beyond the control of the Group, 
resulting in a risk of material overruns 
versus budget.

Power and 
water supply

Power sources and water supply 
are key to the functioning of viable 
mining operations. A lack of power or 
water, or uncertainties around their 
uninterrupted supply, would adversely 
impact the feasibility of the operation.

17

Our ability to maintain regulatory 
compliance in order to protect the 
environment, as well as the health 
and safety of host communities and 
workers, remains our top priority. We 
seek to build partnerships with host 
governments and local communities 
based on trust to drive shared long-
term value while working to minimise 
the social and environmental impacts 
of our activities. The Board oversees 
the Group’s environmental, safety 
and health, and corporate social 
responsibility programmes, policies 
and performance and is in the process 
of setting up an ESG board sub-
committee to focus on these matters.

Capital expenditure and project 
execution are subject to pre-defined 
governance and approval procedures, 
which include feasibility studies prior 
to implementation.  Management and 
the Board regularly review project 
progress and related expenditure on 
projects. This includes reviewing actual 
costs against budgeted costs, updating 
working capital models, and assessing 
potential impacts on future cash flow. 

The Group has concluded a formal 
electrical power supply agreement 
with Namibia Power Corporation for 
power to the mining and processing 
facility at Uis and this will provide 
enough power for Phase 1 of the 
project. Diesel generators will serve as 
backup power.

A geohydrological study, water drilling 
and test pumping programme has 
demonstrated the viability of using 
groundwater sources for the Phase 1 
pilot plant. This was confirmed with 
the implementation and successful 
operation of a water supply network.

Risk and Impact

Mitigation

RESULTS AND DIVIDEND

Country and 
political risk

Key personnel 
risk

AfriTin’s operations are predominantly 
based in Namibia. Emerging-market 
economies are generally subject to 
greater risks including legal, regulatory, 
tax, economic and political risks, which 
are potentially subject to rapid change.

The success and operational 
performance of the Group is 
dependent on the skills, expertise 
and knowledge of management and 
qualified personnel. Group profitability 
could be impacted in the event that 
key personnel leave the business.

Financing

Climate change 

The successful extraction of tin, 
tantalum and eventually lithium will 
require significant capital investment. 
The Group’s ability to raise further 
funds will depend on the success of 
existing operations. Market conditions 
may not be conducive to financing. 
The Group may not be successful in 
procuring the requisite funds. 

Climate change and regulatory actions 
to reduce its impact may affect our 
suppliers, customers and business 
model, and hence affect AfriTin’s 
growth and profitability. This impact 
could be amplified by the perception 
that the Company is undertaking 
activities that are harmful to the 
environment.

Solutions for Phase 2 in terms of both 
electrical power and water supply are 
in the process of being reviewed.

The AfriTin team is experienced at 
operating in Africa. AfriTin routinely 
monitors political and regulatory 
developments in Namibia at both 
regional and local level. 

The Group has built a team of 
executives, scientists, engineers 
and support personnel who are 
experienced and versatile enough 
to address shortcomings that may 
arise from the loss of employees. In 
addition, the Group has developed 
long-standing relationships with 
consulting firms in key specialist areas. 
Remuneration arrangements, given the 
stage of the Group’s development, are 
intended to be sufficiently competitive 
to attract, retain and motivate high-
quality staff capable of achieving the 
Group’s objectives, thereby enhancing 
shareholder value.

The Group has sufficient funds to 
continue as a going concern and has a 
supportive shareholder base, as well as 
significant future investor interest, to 
engage with for future funding rounds. 
The Group monitors cash flows on a 
monthly basis.

AfriTin is working towards 
implementing the recommendations 
of the Task Force on Climate-Related 
Financial Disclosures. Current risk 
mitigation around climate change 
involves assessing exposure across a 
wide range of outcomes, monitoring 
government action around climate 
change and constantly striving to 
reduce the environmental impact of 
our operations. The Board oversees 
the Group’s environmental, safety 
and health, and corporate social 
responsibility programmes, policies 
and performance and is in the process 
of setting up an ESG board sub-
committee to focus on these matters. 

The  Group’s  results  show  a  loss  for  the  year  of  £5  795  883.  The  Directors  will  not  be  recommending  a 
dividend.

SHARE CAPITAL AND FUNDING

Full  details  of  the  authorised  and  issued  share  capital,  together  with  details  of  the  movements  in  the 
Company’s  issued  share  capital  during  the  year,  are  shown  in  Note  20.  The  Company  has  one  class  of 
ordinary shares which carry no right to fixed income. Each share carries the right to one vote at general 
meetings of the Company.

DIRECTORS

The Directors who served the Company during the year and to date are as follows:

Anthony Viljoen 
Glen Parsons   
Laurence Robb 
Roger Williams 
Terence Goodlace 

Chief Executive Officer
Chairman/Independent Non-Executive Director
Independent Non-Executive Director
Independent Non-Executive Director (resigned 29 September 2020)
Independent Non-Executive Director

DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS

The Directors’ beneficial interests in the shares of the Company at 28 February 2021 were:

Anthony Viljoen 
Glen Parsons   
Laurence Robb 
Terence Goodlace 

Ordinary shares of no par value 
11 296 690 
4 307 486 
1 300 815 
- 

Share options
10 600 000
4 500 000
4 000 000
4 000 000

DIRECTORS’ INDEMNITY INSURANCE

The  Group  has  maintained  insurance  throughout  the  year  for  its  directors  and  officers  against  the 
consequences of actions brought against them in relation to their duties for the Group.

EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT POLICIES

The Group places considerable value on the awareness and involvement of its employees in the Group’s 
exploration  and  development  activities.  Within  the  bounds  of  commercial  confidentiality,  information  is 
disseminated  to  all  levels  of  staff  about  matters  that  affect  the  progress  of  the  Group,  and  that  are  of 
interest and concern to them as employees.

CREDITORS PAYMENT POLICY AND PRACTICE

The Group’s policy is to ensure that, in the absence of dispute, all suppliers are dealt with in accordance 
with its standard payment policy to abide by the terms of payment agreed with suppliers when agreeing 
the terms of each transaction. Suppliers are made aware of the terms of payment. 

18

19

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Details of related-party transactions are given in Note 26 of the consolidated financial statements.

EVENTS AFTER BALANCE SHEET DATE

Events after balance sheet date are detailed in Note 25 of the consolidated financial statements.

STATEMENT AS TO DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION TO AUDITOR

The Directors who were in office on the date of approval of these financial statements have confirmed that, 
as far as they are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the auditor is unaware. Each of 
the Directors has confirmed that they have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as Directors 
in  order  to  make  themselves  aware  of  any  relevant  audit  information  and  to  establish  that  it  has  been 
communicated to the auditor.

AUDITOR

The  Directors  will  place  a  resolution  before  the  Annual  General  Meeting  to  reappoint  BDO  LLP  as  the 
Group’s auditor for the ensuing year.

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS

The maintenance and integrity of the Group’s website is the responsibility of corporate management and 
the  Directors;  the  work  carried  out  by  the  auditor  does  not  involve  consideration  of  these  matters  and 
accordingly the auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial 
statements since they were initially presented on the website.

The Group’s website is maintained in compliance with AIM Rule 26.

By order of the Board

ANTHONY VILJOEN

Chief Executive Officer

21 July 2021

20

21

INTRODUCTION

As  a  listed  company  traded  on  the  AIM  market  of  the  London  Stock  Exchange,  we  recognise  the 
importance  of  sound  corporate  governance  throughout  our  organisation,  giving  our  shareholders  and 
other stakeholders including employees, customers, suppliers and the wider community confidence in our 
business. We endeavour to conduct our business in an ethical and sensitive manner irrespective of gender, 
race, colour or creed.

AfriTin has chosen to adopt the Quoted Companies Alliance (QCA) Corporate Governance Code 2018 for 
Smaller Companies. The table below outlines how we apply each of the code’s ten key principles to our 
business.

Principle

Application

1.

Establish a strategy 
and business model 
that promotes 
long-term value for 
shareholders.

2.

Seek to understand 
and meet 
shareholder needs 
and expectations.

3.

Take into account 
wider stakeholder 
and social 
responsibilities and 
their implications 
for long-term 
success.

The Company is a pure tin company listed in London and its vision is to create 
a portfolio of world-class, conflict-free, tin-producing assets. The Company’s 
flagship asset is the Uis brownfield tin mine in Namibia, formerly the world’s 
largest hard-rock tin mine.

The  Company  is  managed  by  an  experienced  Board  of  Directors  and 
management team with a current two-fold strategy: fast-track Uis brownfield 
tin  mine  in  Namibia  to  commercial  production  (the  intention  is  to  ramp  up 
to  10  000  tonnes  of  concentrate)  and  consolidate  other  quality  African 
tin  assets.  The  Company  strives  to  capitalise  on  the  solid  supply/demand 
fundamentals  of  tin  by  developing  a  critical  mass  of  tin  resource  inventory, 
achieving production in the near term and further scaling-up production by 
consolidating tin assets in Africa.

Sustainable  development  principles  are  integrated  into  corporate  strategies 
and decision-making processes by the Board of Directors and management 
team. The Company endeavours to ensure that responsible health and safety, 
environmental, human rights and labour practices and policies are adopted by 
suppliers and contractors. 

The Company is subject to a variety of risks, specifically those relating to the 
mining and exploration industry. The principal risk factors facing the business 
as well as mitigation of those risks are outlined in the Directors’ Report in this 
Annual Report.

The  Board  is  committed  to  maintaining  good  communication  and  having  a 
constructive dialogue with all its shareholders. 

Management, led by the CEO, undertake regular presentations and roadshows 
to  investors  as  appropriate.  This  enables  them  to  develop  a  balanced 
understanding  of  the  issues  and  concerns  of  shareholders.  The  views  of 
shareholders are communicated to the rest of the Board.

Furthermore,  the  Company  keeps  shareholders  informed  on  the  Company’s 
progress through its public announcements and its website. All reports and 
press  releases  are  published  in  the  ‘Investors’  section  of  the  Company’s 
website.

The Board recognises that its prime responsibility is to promote the success of 
the Company for the benefit of its stakeholders and members as a whole. This 
success  is  largely  reliant  on  its  relations  with  its  stakeholders,  both  internal 
(employees  and  shareholders)  and  external  (customers,  suppliers,  business 
partners and advisors).

CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
REPORT

22

23

Principle

Application

Principle

Application

Employees, community members and other stakeholders work in collaboration 
with one another and with transparency and accountability. Open dialogue and 
engagement with community members at our sites is central to maintaining 
a successful relationship, and is essential to ensuring long-term sustainability 
for  all  parties  involved.  The  Company  continually  implements  inclusive  and 
supportive approaches with local communities, to contribute to their economic 
and social well-being. 

The Company endeavours to systematically examine the environmental impact 
of any of our operations and will adopt measures to mitigate this challenge. 
The  goal  is  to  minimise  the  negative  impacts  on  the  environment  of  the 
different processes related to the extraction of tin. At our operational project 
area, Uis, the non-chemical nature of ore beneficiation, combined with an ore 
that is largely free of deleterious elements, contributes to a reduced level of 
environmental  risk.  Nonetheless,  the  Company  ensures  compliance  with  its 
operational environmental management plan through continuous monitoring 
of dust, water and waste management.

The Company maintains a regular dialogue with key suppliers.

Managing human capital equitably and sustainably is central to the Company’s 
project  development  strategy.  The  Company  promotes  an  inclusive  work 
environment through its recruitment policies, management and remuneration 
policies  and  development  initiatives.  Within  the  bounds  of  commercial 
confidentiality, information is disseminated to all levels of staff about matters 
that affect the progress of the Company and that are of interest and concern 
to them as employees. 

The  Company  has  set  up  a  share  option  scheme  for  key  employees  which 
gives them a stake in the Company’s long-term success.

As an entrepreneurial business operating in emerging markets there is clearly 
an elevated risk which is balanced by potentially greater rewards. The Board 
is mindful of and monitors both its corporate risks and individual project risks.

The Board ensures that there is a risk-management framework in place which 
identifies  and  addresses  all  relevant  risks  in  order  to  execute  and  deliver 
strategy. Key risks are reviewed by the Board regularly and disclosed in the 
Directors’ Report.

6.

Ensure that 
between them the 
Directors have the 
necessary up-to-
date experience, 
skills and 
capabilities.

clear information. The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors (Glen Parsons, 
Terence Goodlace and Laurence Robb) are considered to be independent of 
management and free to exercise independent judgement. It is acknowledged 
that the Non-Executive Directors do have share options. However, the quantum 
of these share options is not material and is too low to affect independence.

The  Board  meets  at  least  every  three  months  or  at  any  other  time  deemed 
necessary  for  the  good  management  of  the  business.  Every  Director  has 
attended all Board meetings whilst being a Director of the Company.

Directors  who  have  been  appointed  to  the  Company  have  been  chosen 
because  of  the  skills,  knowledge  and  experience  they  offer  considering  the 
stage of the Company and the strategy that it is pursuing.

The composition of the Board as well as biographical details of Board members 
can be found on the Board of Directors page on the Company website.

Furthermore,  the  Company  has  put  in  place  an  Audit  Committee  and  a 
Remuneration Committee.

The  Directors  have  access  to  training  (online  training  or  external  training 
courses)  to  ensure  that  their  skills  are  kept  up  to  date.  The  Board  and  its 
committees will also seek external expertise and advice where required. 

As part of the induction programme conducted by the Company’s nominated 
adviser, Directors are briefed on regulations that are relevant to their role as 
directors of an AIM-quoted company.

Robert Sewell (Chief Financial Officer) and Frans van Daalen (Chief Operating 
Officer) attend Board meetings by invitation to provide input from a financial 
and operational perspective.

7.

Evaluate Board 
performance 
based on clear and 
relevant objectives, 
seeking continuous 
improvement.

The Board considers evaluation of its performance and that of its committees 
and  individual  Directors  to  be  an  integral  part  of  corporate  governance  to 
ensure  Board  Members  have  the  necessary  skills,  experience  and  abilities 
to  fulfil  their  responsibilities.  The  goal  of  the  Board  evaluation  process  is  to 
identify  and  address  opportunities  for  improving  the  performance  of  the 
Board and to solicit honest, genuine and constructive feedback. 

The Audit Committee receives feedback from the external auditor on the state 
of the Company’s internal controls, and reports their findings to the Board.

The  Chairman  is  responsible  for  ensuring  the  evaluation  process  is  “fit  for 
purpose”, as well as for dealing with matters raised during the process.

The  Board  is  made  up  of  a  Chairman,  two  Non-Executive  Directors  and  the 
CEO.

The roles of the Chairman and CEO are clearly separated.

The  CEO  is  responsible  for  the  day-to-day  operational  management  of  the 
business  and  is  supported  by  a  Chief  Financial  Officer,  a  Chief  Operating 
Officer, geologists and engineers.

The Chairman is responsible for the leadership and effective working of the 
Board,  for  the  implementation  of  sound  corporate  governance,  for  setting 
the  Board  agenda,  and  ensuring  that  Directors  receive  accurate,  timely  and 

8.

Promote a 
corporate culture 
that is based on 
ethical values and 
behaviours.

Succession  planning  is  a  vital  task  for  boards  and  the  management  of 
succession  planning  represents  a  key  measure  of  the  effectiveness  of  the 
Board.

The Company has a strong ethical culture, which is promoted by the Board 
and the management team.

The Company endeavours to conduct its business in an ethical, professional 
and  responsible  manner,  treating  all  employees,  customers,  suppliers  and 
partners with equal courtesy irrespective of gender, race, colour or creed.

24

25

4.

Embed effective 
risk management, 
considering both 
opportunities and 
threats, throughout 
the organisation.

5.

Maintain the 
Board as a well-
functioning, 
balanced team led 
by the chair.

Principle

Application

9.

Maintain 
governance 
structures and 
processes that 
are fit for purpose 
and support good 
decision-making by 
the Board.

10.

Communicate 
how the company 
is governed and 
is performing 
by maintaining 
a dialogue with 
shareholders and 
other relevant 
stakeholders.

The  Board  approves  the  Company’s  strategy  and  ensures  that  necessary 
resources are in place in order for the Company to meet its objectives.

Whilst the Board has delegated the operational management of the Company 
to  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  other  senior  management,  a  number  of 
specific matters are subject to the approval of the Board. These include:
•  annual budget;
interim and final financial statements;
• 
•  management structure and appointments;
•  mergers, acquisitions and disposals;
•  capital raising;
• 
•  corporate strategy;
•  projects of a capital nature; and
•  major contracts.

joint ventures and investments;

The Non-Executive Directors have a particular responsibility to constructively 
challenge  the  strategy  proposed  by  the  executive  management  team,  to 
scrutinise  and  challenge  performance,  to  ensure  appropriate  remuneration, 
and to ensure that succession planning is in place in relation to senior members 
of the management team. The senior management team enjoy open access to 
the Non-Executive Directors.

The  Chairman  is  responsible  for  leadership  of  the  Board  and  ensuring  its 
effectiveness. The Chairman with the assistance of the Chief Executive Officer 
sets  the  Board’s  agenda  and  ensures  that  adequate  time  is  available  for 
discussion of all agenda items, in particular strategic issues.

The roles of the Audit Committee and the Remuneration Committee are set 
out further on in this report.

The governance structures will evolve over time in parallel with the Company’s 
objectives,  strategy,  and  business  model  to  reflect  the  development  of  the 
Company.

The  Board  is  committed  to  maintaining  good  communication  and  having 
constructive  dialogue  with  all  of  its  stakeholders,  including  shareholders, 
providing them with access to information to enable them to come to informed 
decisions  about  the  Company.  The  ‘Investors’  section  on  the  Company’s 
website  provides  all  required  regulatory  information  as  well  as  additional 
information shareholders may find helpful, including:
• 
•  a historical list of the Company’s announcements;
•  corporate governance information;
•  historical Annual Reports and notices of Annual General Meetings; and
• 

information on Board members, advisers and significant shareholdings;

share  price  information  and  interactive  charting  facilities  to  assist 
shareholders in analysing performance.

Results  of  shareholder  meetings  and  details  of  votes  cast  will  be  publicly 
announced  through  the  regulatory  system  and  displayed  on  the  Company’s 
website with suitable explanations of any actions undertaken as a result of any 
significant votes for or against resolutions.

26

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board currently comprises: 

Independent Non-Executive Chairman
•  Glen Parsons (appointed 23 October 2017)

Independent Non-Executive Directors
•  Laurence Robb (appointed 23 October 2017)
•  Terence Goodlace (appointed 23 May 2018)

Executive Director - Chief Executive Officer 
•  Anthony Viljoen (appointed 23 October 2017)

Operational  management  in  South  Africa  and  Namibia  is  led  by  Anthony  Viljoen  supported  by  a  Chief 
Financial Officer (Robert Sewell), a Chief Operating Officer (Frans van Daalen), geologists and engineers. 
Operational management is also supported technically through various consultancy agreements that were 
in place during the year under review.

The Board met formally four times during the year and also met frequently on an ad-hoc basis.

All press releases, including operational updates, are approved by the entire Board.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee meets at least twice a year and is composed exclusively of Non-Executive Directors:  
Glen Parsons (Chairman) and Terence Goodlace. The Chief Financial Officer, Robert Sewell, attends Audit 
Committee meetings by invitation. The committee is responsible for:
• 

reviewing the annual financial statements and interim reports prior to approval, focusing on changes in 
accounting policies and practices, major judgemental areas, significant audit adjustments, going concern 
and compliance with accounting standards, stock exchange requirements, and legal requirements;
receiving and considering reports on internal financial controls, including reports from the auditor, and 
reporting auditor findings to the Board;

• 

•  considering the appointment of the auditor and their remuneration, including reviewing and monitoring 

their independence and objectivity;

•  meeting  with  the  auditor  to  discuss  the  scope  of  the  audit,  issues  arising  from  their  work  and  any 

matters they wish to raise; and

•  developing and implementing policy on the engagement of the external auditor to supply non-audit 

services.

The  Audit  Committee  is  provided  with  details  of  any  proposed  related-party  transactions  in  order  to 
consider and approve the terms and conditions of such transactions. 

The Audit Committee met three times during the year to consider the following agenda items:

August 2020:
•  External audit report
•  Critical accounting estimates
•  Going concern assessment
•  Approval of the Annual Report for the period ended February 2020

September 2020:
•  Approval of the half-year results and report to 31 August 2020
•  Going concern assessment

February 2021:
•  Auditor independence
•  External audit plan for the year ended February 2021

27

THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

The Remuneration Committee meets at least once a year and is composed exclusively of Non-Executive 
Directors: Glen Parsons (Chairman) and Terence Goodlace. 

The Committee is responsible for reviewing the performance of senior management and for setting the scale 
and structure of their remuneration, determining the payment of bonuses, considering the grant of options 
under any share option scheme and, in particular, the price per share and the application of performance 
standards which may apply to any such grant, paying due regard to the interests of shareholders and the 
performance of the Group.

The Remuneration Committee met formally once during the year to consider the following agenda items:

December 2020:
•  Repricing of share options 
•  Awarding discretionary bonuses to the executive team settled through the issue of shares
•  Consideration of salary increases

INTERNAL CONTROLS

The Board acknowledges its responsibility for the Group’s systems of internal controls and for reviewing 
their effectiveness. These internal controls are designed to safeguard the assets of the Group and to ensure 
the  reliability  of  financial  information  for  both  internal  use  and  external  publication. Whilst  the  Board  is 
aware that no system can provide absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss, in light of the 
increased activity and further development of the Group, continuing reviews of internal controls will be 
undertaken to ensure that they are adequate and effective.

RISK MANAGEMENT

The Board considers risk assessment and management to be important in achieving its strategic objectives. 
Project milestones and timelines are regularly reviewed. 

28

29

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Directors’ Report and the financial statements in accordance 
with applicable law and regulations.

The  Companies  (Guernsey)  Law,  2008  requires  the  Directors  to  prepare  Group  financial  statements  for 
each financial year in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Directors are required 
by the AIM rules of the London Stock Exchange to prepare Group financial statements in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU).

The financial statements of the Group are required by law to give a true and fair view of the state of the 
Group’s affairs at the end of the financial year and of the profit or loss of the Group for that year and are 
required by IFRS as adopted in the EU to reflect fairly the financial position and performance of the Group.

In preparing the Group financial statements, the Directors are required to:

i)
ii)
iii)
iv)

Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
State whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU; and
Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that 
the Group will continue in business.

The  Directors  are  responsible  for  keeping  adequate  accounting  records  that  are  sufficient  to  show  and 
explain the Group’s transactions, disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the 
Group, and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 
2008. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and hence for taking reasonable 
steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information 
included on the Group’s website. Legislation in Guernsey governing the preparation and dissemination of 
financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

The Directors confirm they have discharged their responsibilities as noted above.

STATEMENT OF
DIRECTORS’
RESPONSIBILITIES

30

31

OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In our opinion:
• 

the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s affairs as at 28 February 
2021 and of its loss for the year then ended;
the  Group  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  IFRSs  as  adopted  by  the 
European Union; and
the  financial  statements  have  been  properly  prepared  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  the 
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.

• 

• 

We  have  audited  the  financial  statements  of  AfriTin  Mining  Limited  (the  ‘Parent  Company’)  and  its 
subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the year ended 28 February 2021 which comprise the consolidated statement 
of  comprehensive  income,  the  consolidated  statement  of  financial  position,  the  consolidated  statement 
of  changes  in  equity,  the  consolidated  statement  of  cash  flows  and  notes  to  the  consolidated  financial 
statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. 

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation of the financial statements is 
applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.

BASIS FOR OPINION

We  conducted  our  audit  in  accordance  with  International  Standards  on  Auditing  (UK)  (ISAs  (UK)) 
and  applicable  law.  Our  responsibilities  under  those  standards  are  further  described  in  the  Auditor’s 
responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit 
evidence  we  have  obtained  is  sufficient  and  appropriate  to  provide  a  basis  for  our  opinion.  Our  audit 
opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee. 

Independence

We remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements 
that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as 
applied to listed entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these 
requirements. 

CONCLUSIONS RELATING TO GOING CONCERN

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis 
of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. 

We considered the judgements associated with the going concern assessment and the appropriateness 
of disclosure of any uncertainties to be a key focus for our audit, and therefore a key audit matter. Details 
of the Directors’ consideration of the appropriateness of the going concern basis are outlined in Note 2: 
Significant accounting policies. 

Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern 
basis of accounting, and our response to the key audit matter included: 

•  We  discussed  with  management  and  the  Audit  Committee  their  assessment  of  potential  risks  and 
uncertainties,  including  those  related  to  COVID-19,  including  areas  such  as  supply  chain  and  offtake 
disruption, forecast commodity prices and the availability of financing that is relevant to the Group’s 
business model and operations. We formed our own assessment of risks and uncertainties based on our 
understanding of the business and mining sector. 

•  We reviewed the latest Board-approved cash flow forecasts for the Group, which covered 12 months 
from  the  date  of  approval  of  these  financial  statements. We  challenged  management’s  assumptions 
in respect of the level of production, tin and tantalum prices, operating costs and capital expenditure. 

INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS 
OF AFRITIN MINING 
LIMITED

32

33

In doing so, we considered factors such as empirical operational performance, recent cost profile and 
market analyst commentary regarding forecast commodity prices.

South Africa. All of the audits were conducted by either the group audit team or BDO network member 
firms. 

•  We  obtained  management’s  sensitivity  and  stress  test  scenarios  and  considered  management’s 
conclusions  as  to  whether  such  scenarios  are  reasonably  possible  based  on  our  knowledge  of  the 
business and operating environment. 

•  We  evaluated  the  nature  of  mitigating  actions  identified  by  management  in  their  assessment  in  the 
event  of  downside  scenarios,  including  deferral  of  capital  expenditure.  This  included  evaluating  the 
quantum ascribed to these mitigating actions and the extent to which they are within management’s 
control.

•  We agreed the post balance sheet date equity fundraising to bank statements. 
•  We reviewed the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements against the accounting standards 

and our knowledge of the business.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events 
or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue 
as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised 
for issue.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in 
the relevant sections of this report.

OVERVIEW

Coverage

89% (2020: 93%) of Group total assets

99% (2020: 69%) of Group revenue*

* The Group was not in commercial production in the prior year and 

therefore revenue balances were immaterial in FY20.

Key audit matters (“KAM”)

Going concern

Carrying value of the Uis mining assets

2021

2020

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Materiality

Group financial statements as a whole

£230,000 (2020: £210,000) based on 1% of total assets (2020: 1% of 

AN OVERVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF OUR AUDIT

total assets)

Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including 
the  Group’s  system  of  internal  control,  and  assessing  the  risks  of  material  misstatement  in  the  financial 
statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing 
whether  there  was  evidence  of  bias  by  the  Directors  that  may  have  represented  a  risk  of  material 
misstatement.

In approaching the Group audit we considered how the Group is organised and managed. Whilst AfriTin 
Mining  Limited  is  a  Company  registered  in  Guernsey  and  listed  on  AIM  in  the  UK,  the  Group’s  principal 
operations are located in Namibia and South Africa. We assessed the business as being principally a single 
project comprising of the Namibian subsidiaries that operate the Uis Mine, a corporate head office function 
and an exploration business unit. 

The Namibian subsidiaries that operate the Uis Mine and the corporate head office function were regarded 
as being significant components of the Group and were subject to full scope audits. 

The audits of each of the components were principally performed in the United Kingdom, Namibia and 

The  remaining  components  of  the  Group  were  considered  non-significant  and  these  components  were 
principally subject to analytical review procedures, together with specified audit procedures over exploration 
and evaluation related assets. This work was conducted by BDO network member firms.

Our involvement with component auditors

For the work performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement needed in order 
to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained as a basis for our 
opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. Our involvement with component auditors included 
the following:

•  We held planning meetings with the component auditors and local management.
•  Detailed Group reporting instructions were sent to the component auditors, which included significant 
areas to be covered by the audits and set out the information to be reported to the Group audit team. 
•  The Group audit team was actively involved in the direction of the audits performed by the component 
auditor for Group reporting purposes, along with the consideration of findings and determination of 
conclusions drawn. We performed our own additional procedures in respect of certain of the significant 
risk areas that represented Key Audit Matters in addition to the procedures performed by the component 
auditor. 

•  We  received  and  reviewed  Group  reporting  submissions  and  performed  a  review  of  the  component 
auditors’ file. Our review was performed remotely using our online audit software as a result of travel 
restrictions due to COVID-19.

•  We held clearance meetings remotely with the component auditors and local management to discuss 

significant audit and accounting issues and judgements.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our 
audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of 
material  misstatement  (whether  or  not  due  to  fraud)  that  we  identified,  including  those  which  had  the 
greatest  effect  on  the  overall  audit  strategy,  the  allocation  of  resources  in  the  audit,  and  directing  the 
efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial 
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on 
these matters. In addition to the matter described in the Conclusions relating to going concern section, we 
have determined the matter described below to be a key audit matter.

Key audit matter 

Carrying value of the Uis
mining assets 

Details of the carrying value 
of the Uis mining assets are 
disclosed in Note 12: Property, 
Plant and Equipment. 

As disclosed in Note 2: 
Significant accounting policies, 
management have performed 
an impairment indicator 

How the scope of our audit addressed the key 
audit matter

We reviewed and challenged management’s impairment indicator 
assessment  which  was  carried  out  in  accordance  with  relevant 
accounting  standards  in  order  to  determine  whether  there  were 
any indicators of impairment.

In doing so, our procedures included:

•  Comparing the Group’s market capitalisation at year end to its 

net assets.

•  Reviewing  the  Competent  Person’s  Report  to  support 
the  mineral  reserve,  and  performing  an  assessment  of  the 
independence and competence of the expert.

34

35

review in accordance with 
the accounting standards. In 
undertaking this assessment 
management have reviewed 
the underlying valuation model 
of the Uis mine. As set out 
in Note 2, Management have 
concluded that no indicators 
of impairment have been 
identified at year end.

The assessment of the 
recoverable value of the mining 
assets requires significant 
judgement and estimates to 
be made by management – 
in particular regarding the 
inputs applied in the models 
including: future tin and 
tantalum prices; production 
and reserves; operating and 
development costs; and 
discount rates.

The carrying value of mining 
assets is therefore considered 
a key audit matter given 
the level of judgement and 
estimation involved.

•  Obtaining  management’s  Life  of  Mine  (“LoM”)  forecast  to 
confirm that headroom existed over the asset-carrying value 
as part of our assessment of potential impairment indicators. 
•  Critically  reviewing  the  LoM  forecast  and  the  key  inputs  by 
making enquiries of operational management, and evaluating 
against  our  understanding  of  the  operations  and  historical 
performance.

•  Checking  the  mathematical  accuracy  of  management’s 

models.

•  Challenging  the  significant  inputs  and  assumptions  used  in 
the impairment model and whether these were indicative of 
potential bias. This included comparing forecast commodity 
prices to a range of third-party independent market outlook 
reports  and  historical  actual  data,  comparing  the  forecast 
production  to  third-party  feasibility  and  resource  studies, 
and  evaluating  the  judgments  regarding  future  tantalum 
production  against  the  status  of  test  data.  We  compared 
forecast costs against the expected production profiles in the 
mine plans and recent historical performance.

•  Recalculating  the  discount  rate  and  utilising  BDO  valuation 

specialists to assess the discount rate.

•  Reviewing management’s sensitivity analysis and performing 
our  own  sensitivity  analysis  over  individual  key  inputs 
including tin prices and future tantalum production.

Key observation:

We  found  the  key  assumptions  made  by  management  and  the 
Board  in  respect  of  the  underlying  LoM  forecast  to  be  within 
an  acceptable  range  and  found  management’s  conclusion  that 
no impairment indicator was present at 28 February 2021 to be 
appropriate.

OUR APPLICATION OF MATERIALITY

We  apply  the  concept  of  materiality  both  in  planning  and  performing  our  audit,  and  in  evaluating  the 
effect of misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including 
omissions, could influence the economic decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the 
financial statements. 

In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, 
we  use  a  lower  materiality  level,  performance  materiality,  to  determine  the  extent  of  testing  needed. 
Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also 
take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence, 
when evaluating their effect on the financial statements as a whole. 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Materiality

2021

£230 000

2020

£210 000

Basis for determining materiality

1% of total assets 

1% of total assets

Rationale for the benchmark 

applied

We consider total assets to be the most significant determinant 
of the Group’s financial performance used by the members of 
the Group.

The Group has invested significant sums on its production and 
non-production mining assets and these are considered to be 
the key value driver for the Group as its assets are an indicator 

of future value to shareholders. 

£172 500

£157 500

Performance materiality was set at 75% of the above materiality 

level based on assessment of aggregation risk considering 

factors such as volume and nature of errors in prior periods.

Performance materiality

Basis for determining 

performance materiality

Component materiality

We set materiality for each component of the Group based on a percentage of Group materiality dependent 
on  the  size  and  our  assessment  of  the  risk  of  material  misstatement  of  that  component.  Component 
materiality ranged from £128 000 to £46 000 (2020: £100 000 to £95 000). In the audit of each component, 
we further applied performance materiality levels of 75% (2020: 75%) of the component materiality to our 
testing to ensure that the risk of errors exceeding component materiality was appropriately mitigated.

Reporting threshold  

We  agreed  with  the  Audit  Committee  that  we  would  report  to  them  all  individual  audit  differences  in 
excess of £12 000 (2020: £10 000). We also agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our 
view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

OTHER INFORMATION

The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information 
included  in  the  Annual  Report  other  than  the  financial  statements  and  our  auditor’s  report  thereon. 
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent 
otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our 
responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is 
materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, 
or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent 
material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in 
the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a 
material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole 
and performance materiality as follows:

OTHER COMPANIES (GUERNSEY) LAW, 2008, REPORTING

36

37

•  proper accounting records have not been kept by the Company; or

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, 
requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

 
the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records; or 

• 
•  we have failed to obtain all the information and explanations which, to the best of our knowledge and 

belief, are necessary for the purposes of our audit.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTORS

As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities for financial reporting, the Directors are responsible 
for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, 
and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial 
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In  preparing  the  financial  statements,  the  Directors  are  responsible  for  assessing  the  Group’s  and  the 
Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going 
concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the 
Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our  objectives  are  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  as  a  whole 
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that 
includes  our  opinion.  Reasonable  assurance  is  a  high  level  of  assurance,  but  is  not  a  guarantee  that  an 
audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. 
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, 
they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these 
financial statements.

Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud

Irregularities,  including  fraud,  are  instances  of  non-compliance  with  laws  and  regulations.  We  design 
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of 
irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, 
including fraud is detailed below:

•  We  obtained  an  understanding  of  the  legal  and  regulatory  frameworks  that  are  applicable  to  the 
Company and the industry in which it operates, and considered the risk of acts by the Company that 
were contrary to applicable laws and regulations, including fraud. We focused on laws and regulations 
that could give rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements, including but not limited 
to,  Guernsey  Companies  Law,  tax  legislation  and  the  various  Mining  Regulations  in  Namibia.  Based 
on  our  understanding  we  designed  our  audit  procedures  to  identify  non-compliance  with  such  laws 
and regulations impacting the Company. Our procedures involved making enquiries of management 
and  those  charged  with  governance  to  understand  their  awareness  of  any  non-compliance  of  laws 
or  regulations,  inquiring  about  the  policies  that  have  been  established  to  prevent  non-compliance 
with laws and regulations by officers and employees of the Company, inquiring about the Company’s 
methods of enforcing and monitoring compliance with such policies, and reviewing Board minutes to 
identify any instances of non-compliance.

•  We  assessed  the  susceptibility  of  the  Company’s  financial  statements  to  material  misstatement, 
including  how  fraud  might  occur,  by  obtaining  an  understanding  of  the  controls  that  the  Company 
has  established  to  address  risks  identified  by  the  entity,  or  that  otherwise  seek  to  prevent,  deter  or 
detect fraud. We considered the significant fraud risk areas to be in relation to revenue recognition and 
management override of controls. 

•  We addressed the fraud risk in relation to revenue recognition by testing one hundred percent of revenue 
transactions to supporting documentation, including testing the cut-off of revenue transactions in the 
period proceeding and preceding year end. 

•  We  addressed  the  risk  of  management  override  of  internal  controls,  including  testing  a  risk-based 
selection  of  journals  and  evaluating  whether  there  was  evidence  of  bias  in  management’s  estimates 

(refer to the ‘key audit matters’ section) that represented a material misstatement due to fraud.

• 

•  We  also  communicated  relevant  identified  laws  and  regulations  and  potential  fraud  risks  to  the 
component audit team and all engagement team members, and remained alert to any indications of 
fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
In  respect  of  the  component  auditors,  we  communicated  our  consideration  of  where  the  financial 
statements  could  be  susceptible  to  material  misstatement,  including  how  fraud  might  occur,  and 
communicated  specific  procedures  to  be  performed  in  relation  to  testing  the  appropriateness  of 
journal  entries  made  throughout  the  year  by  applying  specific  criteria  to  select  journals  which  may 
be  indicative  of  possible  irregularities  and  fraud  and  also  by  assessing  the  judgements  made  by 
management when making key accounting estimates and judgements, and challenging management 
on  the  appropriateness  of  these  judgements.  As  part  of  our  Group  audit,  we  performed  a  review  of 
the  component  auditors’  file,  which  included  the  areas  detailed  above.  In  addition,  as  part  of  their 
audit, the component auditors assessed compliance with local legislation, including mining regulations 
in  Namibia.  Their  procedures  involved  making  enquiries  of  local  management  to  understand  their 
awareness of any non-compliance of laws or regulations, inquiring about the policies that have been 
established  to  prevent  non-compliance  with  laws  and  regulations,  inquiring  about  the  Company’s 
methods of enforcing and monitoring compliance with such policies, and reviewing Board minutes to 
identify any instances of non-compliance.

Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, 
recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not 
detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, 
misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed. 
The further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected 
in the financial statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it.

A  further  description  of  our  responsibilities  is  available  on  the  Financial  Reporting  Council’s  website  at: 
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

The engagement director on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s opinion is Ryan Ferguson.

USE OF OUR REPORT

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Section 262 of the 
Companies  (Guernsey)  Law,  2008.  Our  audit  work  has  been  undertaken  so  that  we  might  state  to  the 
Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other 
purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other 
than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the 
opinions we have formed.

RYAN FERGUSON

For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Chartered Accountants

London, United Kingdom 

21 July 2021

BDO  LLP  is  a  limited  liability  partnership  registered  in  England  and  Wales  (with  registered  number 
OC305127).

38

39

FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS

40

41

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the year ended 28 February 2021

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As at 28 February 2021

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

Notes

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

Notes

Continuing operations
Revenue

Cost of Sales

Gross (loss)/profit
Impairment of exploration licences

Other administrative expenses

Total administrative expenses

Operating loss
Finance income 

Finance cost

Loss before tax
Income tax expense

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

Items that will or may be reclassified to profit 

or loss:
Exchange differences on translation of share-

based payment reserve

5

11

6

8

9

4 985 107

(4 987 696)

(2 589)
(3 069 232)

(2 539 762)

(5 608 994)

(5 611 583)
 - 

(184 300)

(5 795 883)
 - 

(5 795 883)

69 032 

 (47 336) 
 21 696 
-

(1 815 227)

(1 815 227)

(1 793 531)
 3 793 

(40 719)

(1 830 457)

 - 

(1 830 457)

(531)

(1 039)

Exchange differences on translation of foreign 

(526 231)

(1 113 281)

operations

Exchange differences on non-controlling 

1 390

4 167 

interest

Total comprehensive loss for the year

(6 321 255)

(2 940 610)

Loss for the year attributable to:

Owners of the parent

Non-controlling interests

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

attributable to:

Owners of the parent

Non-controlling interests

Loss per ordinary share

(5 694 962)

(100 921)

(5 795 883)

(1 781 962)

(48 495)

(1 830 457)

(6 221 724)

(99 531)

(6 321 255)

(2 896 282)

(44 328)

(2 940 610)

Assets

Non-current assets
Intangible assets

Property, plant and equipment

Total non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories

Trade and other receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Total current assets

Total assets

Equity and liabilities

Equity
Share capital

Convertible loan note reserve

Accumulated deficit

Warrant reserve

Share-based payment reserve

Foreign currency translation reserve

Equity attributable to the owners of the parent
Non-controlling interests

Total equity

Non-current liabilities
Environmental rehabilitation liability

Lease liability

Total non-current liabilities

Current liabilities
Trade and other payables

Borrowings

Lease liability

Total current liabilities

11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

5 240 461 

           13 634 701 
           18 875 162 

7 441 018 

 12 467 868 

 19 908 886 

                 996 698 

1 18 8 152 

              1 351 200 
              3 536 050 

 246 910 

 648 722 

 574 600 

 1 470 232 

           22 411 212 

 21 379 118 

20 

27

           25 608 001 

              2 170 645 

        (10 030 679) 

21 

                 211 348 

22 

                 743 615 

        (2 061 339) 
           16 641 591 
           (151 344) 
           16 490 247 

                 180 917 

                 260 512 
                 441 429 

              1 484 482 

              3 869 489 

                 125 565 
              5 479 536 

23

18 

 19 

 17 

 16 

 19 

 20 487 239 

 3 770 645 

(4 365 500)

 78 651 

 559 534 

(1 535 108)
 18 995 461 
(51 812)

 18 943 649 

 86 005 

 181 544 
 267 549 

 894 830 

 1 230 961 

 42 129 

 2 167 920 

Basic and diluted loss per share (in pence) 

10

(0.76)

(0.29)

Total equity and liabilities

22 411 212

 21 379 118 

The notes that follow in this report form part of these financial statements.

The  financial  statements  were  authorised  and  approved  for  issue  by  the 
Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 21 July 2021. 

ANTHONY VILJOEN
Chief Executive Officer
21 July 2021 

42

43

 
              
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 28 February 2021

Total equity at 28 February 2019

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

Transactions with owners:

Share-based payments in the year

Issue of shares

Share issue costs

Issue of convertible loan notes

Convertible loan note issue costs

Share capital
£

17 337 718 

 -

 - 

-

 - 

3 261 208 

(111 687)

Convertible
loan note
reserve
£

-

 - 

 - 

-

 - 

-

-

-

-

3 800 000 

(29 355)

Accumulated 
deficit
£

(2 583 538)

(1 781 962)

 - 

(1 781 962)

 - 

 - 

 - 

-

-

Warrant
reserve
£

Share-based 
payment
reserve
£

Foreign
currency 
translation 
reserve
£

Non-
controlling 
interests
£

Total
£

Total equity
£

78 651 

220 729 

(421 827)

14 631 733 

(7 484)

14 624 249 

 - 

 - 

-

 - 

 - 

 - 

-

-

 - 

 - 

(1 781 962)

(48 495)

(1 830 457)

(1 039)

(1 113 281)

(1 114 320)

 4 167 

(1 110 153)

(1 039)

(1 113 281)

(2 896 282)

(44 328)

(2 940 610)

403 562 

(63 718)

 - 

-

-

 - 

 - 

 - 

-

-

 403 562 

3 197 490

(111 687)

3 800 000 

(29 355)

 - 

 - 

 - 

-

-

 403 562 

 3 197 490 

(111 687)

3 800 000 

(29 355)

Total equity at 29 February 2020

20 487 239 

3 770 645 

(4 365 500)

78 651 

559 534 

(1 535 108)

 18 995 461 

(51 812)

 18 943 649 

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

Transactions with owners:

Share-based payments in the year (includes 

amounts due to staff and suppliers)

Issue of shares

Share issue costs

-

-

-

3 774 079

(253 317)

-

-

-

- 

-

Conversion of convertible loan notes

1 600 000

(1 600 000)

Warrants issued in the year

Warrants expired in the year

- 

- 

- 

- 

(5 694 962)

-

(5 694 962)

-

-

-

- 

-

29 783

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

162 480

(29 783)

- 

(531)

(531)

281 431

(96 819)

-

- 

-

- 

- 

(5 694 962) 

(100 921)

(5 795 883) 

(526 231)

(526 762) 

1 390

(525 372) 

(526 231)

(6 221 724)

(99 531)

(6 321 255)

- 

- 

- 

-

- 

- 

 281 431 

 3 677 260 

(253 317) 

-   

 162 480 

 -   

- 

- 

- 

-

- 

- 

281 431 

 3 677 260 

(253 317) 

 -   

 162 480 

 -   

Total equity at 28 February 2021

25 608 001

2 170 645

(10 030 679)

211 348

743 615

(2 061 339)

 16 641 591 

(151 344)

 16 490 247 

44

45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
    
 
  
    
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended 28 February 2021

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

Notes

Cash flows from operating activities

Loss before taxation
Adjustments for:

Fair value adjustment to customer contract

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

Impairment of exploration licences

Share-based payments

Equity-settled transactions

Finance income

Finance costs

Changes in working capital:

Increase in receivables

Increase in inventory
Increase in payables

Net cash used in operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities
Finance income

Purchase of intangible assets

Purchase of property, plant and equipment 

(including capitalised cash interest of £179 194 

(2020: £55 235))

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities
Finance costs

Lease payments

Net proceeds from issue of shares 

Net proceeds from issue of convertible loan notes

Proceeds from borrowings

Repayment of borrowings

Net cash generated from financing activities

5

12

11

22

8

14

13
17

11

12

8

19

20

16

16

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash 

equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of 

the year

Foreign exchange differences

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

15

46

(5 795 883) 

(1 830 457)

(205 635)

 898 528  

 3 069 232 

 217 407  

 618 260 

 -   

 184 300 

(352 953) 

 (753 688) 
 619 573 

-

 128 130 

-

184 888

 109 190 

(3 793)

 40 719

(220 634)

(241 546)
 578 828 

(1 500 858) 

(1 254 675)

 -   

(964 191) 

(1 990 856) 

 3 793 

(596 291)

(7 159 313)

(2 955 047) 

(7 751 811)

(37 612) 

(128 600) 

 2 796 683 

 -   

 7 908 028 

(5 378 742)

 5 159 757 

(562)

(68 015)

 2 876 705

 3 770 645

4 840 989

(3 610 028)
 7 809 734

 703 852 

(1 196 752)

574 600 

1 781 335 

 72 748  
 1 351 200 

 (9 983)

574 600

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 28 February 2021

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

AfriTin Mining Limited (“AfriTin”) was incorporated and domiciled in Guernsey on 1 September 2017, and 
admitted to the AIM market in London on 9 November 2017. The company’s registered office is PO Box 282, 
Oak House, Hirzel Street, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 3RH and operates from Illovo Edge Office Park, 2nd 
Floor, Building 3, Corner Harries and Fricker Road, Illovo, Johannesburg, 2116, South Africa.

These financial statements are for the year ended 28 February 2021 and the comparative figures are for the 
year ended 29 February 2020.

The AfriTin Group comprises AfriTin Mining Limited and its subsidiaries as noted below.

AfriTin Mining Limited (“AML”) is an investment holding company and holds 100% of Guernsey subsidiary, 
Greenhills Resources Limited (“GRL”).

GRL  is  an  investment  holding  company  that  holds  investments  in  resource-based  tin  and  tantalum 
exploration companies in Namibia and South Africa. The Namibian subsidiary is AfriTin Mining (Namibia) 
Pty Limited (“AfriTin Namibia”), in which GRL holds 100% equity interest. The South African subsidiaries 
are Mokopane Tin Company Pty Limited (“Mokopane”) and Pamish Investments 71 Pty Limited (“Pamish 
71”), in which GRL holds 100% equity interest.

AfriTin Namibia owns an 85% equity interest in Uis Tin Mining Company Pty Limited (“UTMC”). The minority 
shareholder in UTMC is The Small Miners of Uis who own 15%.

Mokopane owns a 74% equity interest in Renetype Pty Limited (“Renetype”) and a 50% equity interest in 
Jaxson 641 Pty Limited (“Jaxson”).

The  minority  shareholders  in  Renetype  are  African  Women  Enterprises  Investments  Pty  Limited  and 
Cannosia Trading 62 CC who own 10% and 16% respectively.

The minority shareholder in Jaxson is Lerama Resources Pty Limited who owns a 50% interest in Jaxson. 
Pamish 71 owns a 74% interest in Zaaiplaats Mining Pty Limited (“Zaaiplaats”). The minority shareholder in 
Zaaiplaats is Tamiforce Pty Limited who owns 26%.

AML holds 100% of Tantalum Investment Pty Limited, a company containing Namibian exploration licenses 
EPL5445 and EPL5670 for the exploration of tin, tantalum and associated minerals.

As at 28 February 2021, the AfriTin Group comprised:

Company

AfriTin Mining Limited

Greenhills Resources Limited1

AfriTin Mining Pty Limited1

Tantalum Investment Pty Limited1

AfriTin Mining (Namibia) Pty Limited2

Uis Tin Mining Company Pty Limited3

Mokopane Tin Company Pty Limited2

Renetype Pty Limited4

Jaxson 641 Pty Limited4

Pamish Investments 71 Pty Limited2

Zaaiplaats Mining Pty Limited5

Equity holding
and voting
rights

Country of 
incorporation

Nature of activities

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

85%

100%

74%

50%

100%

74%

47

Guernsey

Ultimate holding company

Guernsey

Holding company

South Africa

Group support services

Namibia

Namibia

Namibia

Tin & tantalum exploration

Tin & tantalum operations

Tin & tantalum operations

South Africa

Holding company

South Africa

Tin & tantalum exploration

South Africa

Tin & tantalum exploration

South Africa

Holding company

South Africa

Property owning

 
 
 
1 Held directly by AfriTin Mining Limited

2 Held by Greenhills Resources Limited

3 Held by AfriTin Mining (Namibia) Pty Limited

4 Held by Mokopane Tin Company Pty Limited

5 Held by Pamish Investments 71 Pty Limited

These financial statements are presented in Pound Sterling (£) because that is the currency in which the 
Group has raised funding on the AIM market in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, Pound Sterling (£) is the 
functional currency of the ultimate holding company, AfriTin Mining Limited.

The Group’s key subsidiaries, AfriTin Namibia and UTMC, use the Namibian Dollar (N$) as their functional 
currency. The year-end spot rate used to translate all Nambian Dollar balances was £1 = N$21.10 and the 
average rate for the financial year was £1 = N$21.31. 

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

These  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting 
Standards,  International  Accounting  Standards  and  Interpretations  (collectively  “IFRS”)  issued  by  the 
International  Accounting  Standards  Board  (“IASB”)  as  adopted  by  the  European  Union  (“EU  adopted 
IFRS”).

The  Group  has  adopted  the  standards,  amendments  and  interpretations  effective  for  annual  periods 
beginning  on  or  after  1  March  2020.  The  adoption  of  these  standards  and  amendments  did  not  have  a 
material effect on the financial statements of the Group. See Note 3.

The  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  under  the  historical  cost  convention.  The 
preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting 
estimates.  It  also  requires  management  to  exercise  judgement  in  the  process  of  applying  the  Group’s 
accounting  policies.  The  areas  involving  a  higher  degree  of  judgement  or  complexity  and  areas  where 
assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are discussed further in 
this note. The principal accounting policies are set out below.

GOING CONCERN

These financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going 
concern which assumes the company will be able to continue in operation for the foreseeable future and 
will be able to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations.

At year end, the company had cash in the bank of £1.4m and had drawn down £1.7m of the £2m Nedbank 
working capital facility.

Subsequent to year end, an equity placement in May 2021 raised gross proceeds of £13m.

Furthermore, both long term liabilities and associated interest, namely the remaining 2019 convertible loan 
notes and the 2020 loan notes were settled on 25 May 2021. The outstanding convertible loan notes were 
partially settled through conversion into ordinary shares and partially settled in cash. The outstanding loan 
notes were all settled in cash. 

Management have prepared a detailed cash flow forecast for the period to 31 July 2022 and stress tests of 
this forecast. The forecast excludes the Group’s £2.038m working capital and VAT facility that is currently 
due for renewal.  The Directors fully anticipate renewal of the facility based on current discussions with 
the  lender,  the  security  in  place  and  the  history  of  renewals.  The  base  case  forecast  demonstrates  that 
the Group will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due and includes the following key 
assumptions:

•  Prices have been set at $28 100 per tonne of tin and $150 000 per tonne of tantalum.
•  The  base  case  forecast  assumes  continuing  steady-state  production  for  the  current  mining  and 

processing facility.

•  The base case forecast includes the procurement of long-lead items relating to the Phase 1 expansion 
but  does  not  include  the  full  capital  expenditure  required  for  the  Phase  1  expansion,  which  remains 
discretionary, as management intends to finance this requirement with debt financing.

In addition, the Board have considered the risks and uncertainties associated with COVID-19 on the Group’s 
operations including the potential impact of production stoppages as a result of potential outbreaks of 
the virus at the operation as well as downside scenarios in relation to commodity pricing and production 
across the period.  The scenarios demonstrated that the Group will be able to maintain liquidity without 
use of its working capital facilities through management of its expansionary capital project expenditure.

Accordingly, the Directors have concluded that the going concern basis in the preparation of the financial 
statements is appropriate and that there are no material uncertainties that would cast doubt on that basis 
of preparation.

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries  are  all  entities  (including  structured  entities)  over  which  the  Group  has  control.  The  Group 
controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with 
the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully 
consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated from the 
date that control ceases.

The  Group  applies  the  acquisition  method  to  account  for  business  combinations.  The  consideration 
transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred 
to  the  former  owners  of  the  acquiree  and  the  equity  interests  issued  by  the  Group.  The  consideration 
transferred  includes  the  fair  value  of  any  asset  or  liability  resulting  from  a  contingent  consideration 
arrangement.  Identifiable  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  and  contingent  liabilities  assumed  in  a  business 
combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The Group recognises any 
non-controlling interest in the acquiree on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis, either at fair value or at the 
non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the recognised amounts of the acquiree’s identifiable net 
assets.

Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.

If  the  business  combination  is  achieved  in  stages,  the  acquisition-date  carrying  value  of  the  acquirer’s 
previously held equity interest in the acquiree is re-measured to fair value at the acquisition date; any gains 
or losses arising from such re-measurement are recognised in profit or loss.

Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the Group is recognised at fair value at the acquisition 
date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration that is deemed to be an asset 
or liability are recognised either in profit or loss or as a change to other comprehensive income. Contingent 
consideration that is classified as equity is not re-measured, and its subsequent settlement is accounted 
for within equity.

The acquisition of subsidiaries that do not meet the definition of a business and hold early-stage exploration 
licenses are accounted for as asset purchases with the fair value of consideration being allocated to the 
assets.

Inter-company  transactions,  balances  and  unrealised  gains/losses  on  transactions  between  Group 
companies  are  eliminated.  When  necessary,  amounts  reported  by  subsidiaries  have  been  adjusted  to 
conform with the Group’s accounting policies.

48

49

Disposal of subsidiaries

iii)   all resulting exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income.

When  the  Group  ceases  to  have  control,  any  retained  interest  in  the  entity  is  measured  to  its  fair  value 
at the date when control is lost, with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. The fair 
value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest 
as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognised in other 
comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the Group had directly disposed of 
the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive 
income are reclassified to profit or loss.

Non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are identified separately from the Group’s equity therein. Those 
interests  of  non-controlling  shareholders  that  present  ownership  interests  entitling  their  holders  to  a 
proportionate  share  of  the  net  assets  upon  liquidation  are  initially  measured  at  fair  value.  Subsequent 
to acquisition, the carrying amount of non-controlling interests is the amount of those interests at initial 
recognition plus the non-controlling interests’ share of subsequent changes in equity. Total comprehensive 
income is attributed to non-controlling interests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having 
a deficit balance.

SEGMENT REPORTING

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief 
operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources 
and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the management steering 
committee that makes strategic decisions.

FOREIGN CURRENCIES

Functional and presentational currency

The individual financial statements of each Group company are prepared in the currency of the primary 
economic environment in which they operate (its functional currency). For the purpose of the consolidated 
financial  statements,  the  results  and  financial  position  of  each  group  company  are  expressed  in  Pound 
Sterling, which is the functional currency of the Company, and the presentation currency for the consolidated 
financial statements. 

Transactions and balances

Foreign  currency  transactions  are  translated  into  the  functional  currency  using  the  exchange  rates 
prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation date where items are re-measured. Foreign exchange 
gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end 
exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the 
income statement, except when deferred in other comprehensive income as qualifying cash flow hedges 
and qualifying net investment hedges.

Group companies

The  results  and  financial  position  of  all  the  Group  entities  (none  of  which  has  the  currency  of  a  hyper-
inflationary economy) that have a financial currency different from the presentation currency are translated 
into the presentation currency as follows:

i)    assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of  

ii) 

that balance sheet;
income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates (unless  
the average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the  
transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rate on the dates of the  
transactions); and

REVENUE RECOGNITION

IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” establishes a comprehensive framework for determining 
whether, how much and when revenue is recognised. The core principle is that an entity recognises revenue 
to  depict  the  transfer  of  promised  goods  and  services  to  the  customer  of  an  amount  that  reflects  the 
consideration  to  which  the  entity  expects  to  be  entitled  in  exchange  for  those  goods  or  services.  The 
Group generates revenue from its primary activity, the sale of tin concentrate, and it continued to generate 
immaterial revenue from the sale of sand.

The Group produces and sells tin concentrate from its Uis Tin Mine in Namibia. Once concentrate has been 
produced at the Uis plant, it is sampled, bagged and loaded into containers for transportation to the port 
in Walvis Bay for shipment.

The  company  currently  has  an  offtake  agreement  with  its  customer,  Thailand  Smelting  and  Refining 
Company (“Thaisarco”), which was signed on 1 August 2019. This contract was renewed on 1 December 
2020 for a further 3 years. As per the contract, Thaisarco pays AfriTin on the basis of actual tin content in 
the concentrate per Thaisarco’s analysis at the London Metal Exchange price less treatment charges, unit 
deductions and impurity charges.

The Group can elect for the sale of each shipment to occur under the following terms:

Option 1: Standard provisional payment 

Thaisarco shall pay 90% provisional payment on the basis of actual tin content as per their own analysis. 
Payment is to be made within 10 working days after the arrival of concentrate at Thaisarco’s works. Title 
shall pass to Thaisarco when the concentrate arrives at the Songkhla Port in Thailand.

Option 2: Provisional payment option against original bill of lading  

Thaisarco shall pay 90% provisional payment on the basis of provisional tin content per UTMC’s analysis. 
The provisional payment shall be done against presentation of a provisional invoice and an original bill of 
lading. Title shall pass to Thaisarco when UTMC receives the 90% provisional payment.

Option 3: Provisional payment option against warehouse holding certificate

Thaisarco shall pay 70% provisional payment on the basis of provisional tin content per UTMC’s analysis. 
The provisional payment shall be done against presentation of provisional invoice and original warehouse 
holding certificate. Thaisarco shall pay an additional 20% provisional payment upon presentation of the 
original bill of lading. Title shall pass to Thaisarco when the UTMC receives the 70% provisional payment.

During the year, the Group concluded sales under either Option 2 or Option 3. 

Revenue is recognised at a point in time when title and control of the goods has transferred to the customer, 
which is when the concentrate arrives at the Songkhla Port in Thailand under Option 1 or when provisional 
payment is received by UTMC under Option 2 and Option 3. There is limited judgement needed to identify 
the  point  at  which  control  passes:  once  physical  delivery  of  the  products  to  the  agreed  location  has 
occurred, the Group no longer has physical possession of the products. At this point, the Group will have 
a present right to payment and retains none of the significant risks and rewards of the goods in question.

Pricing for the provisional payment is determined by the published tin price on the date that title and control 
passes. Pricing for the final payment shall be declared within 20 market days after arrival at Thaisarco’s 
works. The lower of the cash price and the 3-month forward-looking price is used in these calculations. 

Variable consideration relating to final assay results is constrained in estimating revenue unless it is highly 
probable that there will not be a future reversal in the amount of revenue recognised when the final assay 
has been determined.

50

51

 
 
 
 
Revenue from the sale of sand is recognised at the point in time when control of the goods has transferred 
to the customer, which is when the sand leaves the Group’s premises. At this point, the Group will have a 
present right to payment and retains none of the significant risks and rewards of the goods in question.

TAXATION

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.

The tax charge is based on taxable profit for the period. The Group’s liability for current tax is calculated 
by using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amount 
of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation 
of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the “balance sheet liability” method.

Deferred  tax  liabilities  are  recognised  for  all  taxable  temporary  differences  and  deferred  tax  assets  are 
recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible 
temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply 
to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled based upon rates enacted and substantively 
enacted at the reporting date. Deferred tax is charged or credited to profit or loss, except when it relates 
to items credited or charged to other comprehensive income, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt 
with in other comprehensive income.

•  whether  exploration  for  and  evaluation  of  mineral  resources  in  a  specific  area  have  not  led  to  the 
discovery of commercially viable deposits and the Group has decided to discontinue such activities in 
the specific area; or

•  whether  sufficient  data  exists  to  indicate  that  although  a  development  in  a  specific  area  is  likely  to 
proceed, the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is unlikely to be recovered in full 
from successful development or by sale.

If  any  such  facts  or  circumstances  are  noted,  the  Group,  as  a  next  step,  perform  an  impairment  test  in 
accordance with the provisions of IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets”. In such circumstances, the aggregate 
carrying value of the mining exploration and assets is compared to the expected recoverable amount of 
the cash-generating unit. The recoverable amount is the higher of value in use and the fair value less costs 
to sell.

SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES

i) Warrant reserve

The  warrants  issued  by  the  Company  are  recorded  at  fair  value  on  initial  recognition  net  of  transaction 
costs. The fair value of warrants granted is recognised as an expense or as share issue costs based on their 
nature, with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value of the warrants granted is measured using 
the Black Scholes valuation model, taking into account the terms and conditions under which the options 
were granted. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of warrants 
that vest.

INTANGIBLE EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS

ii) Convertible loan note reserve 

All costs associated with mineral exploration and evaluation including the costs of acquiring prospecting 
licenses; mineral production licenses and annual license fees; rights to explore; topographical, geological, 
geochemical and geophysical studies; exploratory drilling; trenching, sampling and activities to evaluate the 
technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource; are capitalised as intangible 
exploration and evaluation assets and subsequently measured at cost.

If  an  exploration  project  is  successful,  the  related  expenditures  will  be  transferred  at  cost  to  property, 
plant and equipment and amortised over the estimated life of the commercial ore reserves on a unit of 
production basis (with this charge being taken through profit or loss). Where capitalised costs relate to 
both development projects and exploration projects, the Group reclassifies a portion of the costs which 
are considered attributable to near-term production based on a percentage of the ore resource expected 
to be mined in the relevant phase. Where a project does not lead to the discovery of commercially viable 
quantities  of  mineral  resources  and  is  relinquished,  abandoned,  or  is  considered  to  be  of  no  further 
commercial value to the Group, the related costs are recognised in the income statement. 

The recoverability of deferred exploration costs is dependent upon the discovery of economically viable 
ore reserves, the ability of the Group to obtain necessary financing to complete the development of ore 
reserves and future profitable production or proceeds from the extraction or disposal thereof.

IMPAIRMENT OF EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS

The proceeds received on issue of the Group’s convertible loan notes are allocated into their liability and 
equity components based on the terms of the agreement.

The Group takes into account:
•  whether there is a contractual obligation to settle in cash;
•  whether there is a contractual obligation to issue a variable number of shares; and
•  whether the instrument’s book value is variable.

Where none of the above criteria are met, the convertible loan notes are allocated as equity.

iii) Share-based payment reserve 

Where equity settled share options are awarded to directors or employees, the fair value of the options 
at the date of grant is charged to the statement of comprehensive income over the vesting period. Non-
market vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected 
to  vest  at  each  reporting  date  so  that,  ultimately,  the  cumulative  amount  recognised  over  the  vesting 
period is based on the number of options that eventually vest. Non-vesting conditions and market vesting 
conditions are factored into the fair value of the options granted. As long as all other vesting conditions 
are  satisfied,  a  charge  is  made  irrespective  of  whether  the  market  vesting  conditions  are  satisfied.  The 
cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market vesting condition or where a non-vesting 
condition is not satisfied.

Intangible exploration and evaluation assets are reviewed regularly for indicators of impairment following 
the guidance in IFRS 6 “Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources” and tested for impairment 
where such indicators exist.

Where the terms and conditions of options are modified before they vest, the increase in the fair value of 
the options, measured immediately before and after the modification, is also charged to the statement of 
comprehensive income over the remaining vesting period.

In accordance with IFRS 6, the Group considers the following facts and circumstances in their assessment 
of whether the Group’s exploration assets may be impaired:
•  whether the period for which the Group has the right to explore in a specific area has expired during 

the period or will expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed; or

•  whether  substantive  expenditure  on  further  exploration  for  and  evaluation  of  mineral  resources  in  a 

specific area is neither budgeted nor planned; or

Where equity instruments are granted to persons other than employees, the statement of comprehensive 
income is charged with the fair value of goods and services received.

52

53

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation.

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation is provided at rates calculated to write off the cost less the estimated 
residual value of each asset over its expected useful economic life. The applicable rates are: 

•  The mining assets are depreciated using the units of production method from the point that commercial 
production was achieved. This reflects the production activity in the period as a proportion of the total 
mining reserve. Where the units of production method is used, the assets are depreciated based on a 
rate determined by the tonnes of ore processed divided by the estimate of the mineral reserve. 

•  Short-lived assets which are used in the mining and processing plant are depreciated over a period of 

between one and ten years.

•  Right-of-use assets are depreciated over the period of the lease contract.
•  Computer equipment is depreciated over three years.
•  Furniture is depreciated over five years.
•  Vehicles are depreciated over four years.

Mining assets under construction are not depreciated.

The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation methods are reviewed at each year end and 
adjusted if necessary.

Gains or losses on disposal are included in profit or loss.

An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying 
amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.

RIGHT-OF-USE ASSET

At inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether a contract is, or contains a lease. A contract is, or 
contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, for a period of 
time, in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an 
identified asset, the Group assesses whether:
• 

the contract involves the use of an identified asset. This may be specified explicitly or implicitly and 
should be physically distinct or represent substantially all of the capacity of a physically distinct asset. 
If the supplier has a substantive substitution right, then the asset is not identified;
the  Group  has  the  right  to  obtain  substantially  all  of  the  economic  benefits  from  use  of  the  asset 
throughout the period of use; and
the Group has the right to direct the use of the asset. The Group has the right when it has the decision-
making rights that are most relevant to changing how and for what purposes the asset is used. In rare 
cases  where  the  decision  about  how  and  for  what  purpose  the  assets  is  used  is  predetermined,  the 
Group has the right to direct the use of the asset if either:
 - the Group has the right to operate the asset; or
 - the Group designed the asset in a way that predetermines how and for what purpose it
   will be used.

• 

• 

At inception or on reassessment of a contract that contains a lease component, the Group allocates the 
consideration in the contract to each lease component on the basis of their relative stand-alone prices.

The right-of-use asset is initially measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted 
using the incremental borrowing rate.

The right-of-use asset is subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement 
date to the end of the lease term. In addition, the right-of-use asset is annually assessed for impairment 
and will be adjusted for certain re-measurements of the lease liability.

IMPAIRMENT OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

At each statement of financial position date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible assets 
to  determine  whether  there  is  any  indication  that  those  assets  have  suffered  an  impairment  loss.  If  any 
such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent 
of the impairment loss, if any. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from 
other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset 
belongs.

Where  there  has  been  a  change  in  economic  conditions  that  indicate  a  possible  impairment  in  a  cash-
generating unit, the recoverability of the net book value relating to that mine is assessed by comparison 
with the estimated discounted future cash flows based on management’s expectations of future commodity 
prices and future costs.

The  recoverable  amount  is  determined  on  the  fair  value  less  cost  to  develop  basis.  In  assessing  the 
recoverable amount, which is determined on a fair value less costs to develop basis, the expected future 
post-tax  cash  flows  from  the  asset  are  discounted  to  their  present  value  using  a  post-tax  discount  rate 
that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. 
The Life of Mine (“LoM”) plan is the approved management plan at the reporting date for ore extraction 
and its associated capital expenditure. The capital expenditure included in the impairment model does not 
include capital expenditure to enhance the asset performance outside of the existing LoM plan. The ore 
tonnes included in the LoM plan are those as per the Reserve Statement, which management considers 
economically viable.

If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying 
amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An 
impairment loss is recognised as an expense immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued 
amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease to the extent that it reverses 
gains previously recognised in other comprehensive income.

Where conditions giving rise to impairment subsequently reverse, the effect of the impairment charge is 
also reversed as a credit to the income statement, net of any depreciation that would have been charged 
since the impairment.

INVENTORIES

Inventory consists of tin concentrate on hand, the run of mine stockpile and consumable items. 

The  tin  concentrate  is  carried  at  the  lower  of  cost  or  net  realisable  value.  The  cost  of  the  concentrate 
includes  direct  materials,  direct  labour,  depreciation  and  overhead  costs  relating  to  processing  and 
engineering activities. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price net of any estimated selling costs 
in the ordinary course of business. 

The run of mine stockpile is carried at the lower of cost or net realisable value. The cost of the stockpile 
includes direct materials, direct labour, depreciation and overhead costs relating to mining activities. Net 
realisable value is the estimated selling price net of necessary processing costs and any estimated selling 
costs in the ordinary course of business. 

Consumables are valued at the lower of cost (determined on the weighted average basis) and
net  realisable  value.  Cost  comprises  all  costs  of  purchase,  costs  of  conversion  and  other  costs  incurred 
in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Replacement cost is used as the best 
available measure of net realisable value.

54

55

       
       
 
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

Financial instruments are recognised in the Group’s statement of financial position when the Group becomes 
a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. 

Financial liabilities include trade and other payables, borrowings and other longer-term financing, classified 
into one of the following categories:

FINANCIAL ASSETS 

The Company classifies its financial assets in the following measurement categories:
• 
• 

those to be measured subsequently at amortised cost, and
those to be measured subsequently at fair value through profit or loss.

Fair value through profit and loss: The liabilities are carried in the statement of financial position at fair 
value with changes in fair value recognised in the income statement. The Group currently has no financial 
liabilities carried at fair value through profit and loss.

Financial liabilities carried at amortised cost: 

The classification depends on the Company’s business model for managing the financial assets and the 
contractual terms of the cash flows.

Trade and other payables

Financial assets are classified as at amortised cost only if the asset is held to collect the contractual cash 
flows and the contractual terms of the asset give rise to cash flows that are solely payments of principal 
and interest. At subsequent reporting dates, financial assets at amortised cost are measured at amortised 
cost less any impairment losses.

For assets measured at fair value, gains and losses will be recorded in profit or loss.

IMPAIRMENT OF FINANCIAL ASSETS

The  Group  assesses  on  a  forward-looking  basis  the  expected  credit  losses,  defined  as  the  difference 
between the contractual cash flows and the cash flows that are expected to be received, associated with 
its assets carried at amortised cost. The impairment methodology applied depends on whether there has 
been a significant increase in credit risk. For trade receivables only, the simplified approach permitted by 
IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” is applied, which requires expected lifetime losses to be recognised from 
initial recognition of the receivables. Losses are recognised in the income statement. When a subsequent 
event  causes  the  amount  of  impairment  loss  to  decrease,  the  decrease  in  impairment  loss  is  reversed 
through the income statement. 

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration receivable less any 
impairment. 

Trade and other receivables are subsequently measured at amortised cost or at fair value through profit 
or loss.

Under its offtake arrangement, the Group receives a provisional payment upon satisfaction of its performance 
obligations based on the tin price at that date. This occurs prior to the final price determination and the 
Group then subsequently receives the difference between the final price and quantity and the provisional 
payment. As a result of the pricing structure, the instrument is classified at fair value through profit or loss 
and changes in fair value are recorded as other revenue.

Trade and other receivables are classified as a current asset as these are expected to be settled within a 
year.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at hand and deposits on a term of not greater than three months. 

Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised 
cost, calculated using the effective interest rate method.

Borrowings

Interest-bearing debt is initially recorded at fair value, less transaction costs and is subsequently measured 
at amortised cost, calculated using the effective interest rate method.

Borrowing  costs  are  expensed  as  incurred  except  where  they  relate  to  the  financing  of  construction  or 
development  of  qualifying  assets  in  which  case  they  are  capitalised  up  to  the  date  when  the  qualifying 
asset is ready for its intended use.

DERECOGNITION

A  financial  asset  (or,  where  applicable,  a  part  of  a  financial  asset  or  part  of  a  group  of  similar  financial 
assets) is primarily derecognised when:
•  The rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; or
•  The company has transferred its right to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation 

to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party, and either

- The company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or 
- The company has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the  
   asset, but has transferred control of the asset.

A financial liability (in whole or in part) is derecognised when the Group has extinguished its contractual 
obligations, it expires or is cancelled. 

Any gain or loss on derecognition is taken to the profit or loss.

REHABILITATION PROVISION 

The net present value of estimated future rehabilitation costs is provided for in the financial statements and 
capitalised within property, plant and equipment on initial recognition. Rehabilitation will generally occur 
on closure or after closure of a mine. 

Initial recognition is at the time of the construction or disturbance occurring and thereafter as and when 
additional construction or disturbances take place. The estimates are reviewed annually to take into account 
the effects of inflation and changes in the estimated cost of the rehabilitation works and are discounted 
using rates that reflect the time value of money. Annual increases in the provision due to the unwinding of 
the discount are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a finance cost. The present value 
of additional disturbances and changes in the estimate of the rehabilitation liability are recorded to mining 
assets against an increase/decrease in the rehabilitation provision. 

56

57

 
  
  
 
The rehabilitation asset is amortised over the life of the mine once commercial production commences. 
Rehabilitation  projects  undertaken,  included  in  the  estimates,  are  charged  to  the  provision  as  incurred. 
Environmental  liabilities,  other  than  rehabilitation  costs,  which  relate  to  liabilities  arising  from  specific 
events, are expensed when they are known, probable and may be reasonably estimated.

would result in a £49 935 difference in the liability.

iii) Impairment indicator assessment for exploration & evaluation assets

LEASE LIABILITY 

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted 
using the interest rate implicit in the lease. The liability is subsequently measured at amortised cost using 
the effective interest method. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction 
of  the  lease  liability  using  the  incremental  borrowing  rate  to  achieve  a  constant  rate  of  interest  on  the 
remaining balance of the liability. 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS

In  the  application  of  the  Group’s  accounting  policies,  the  Directors  are  required  to  make  judgements, 
estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent 
from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other 
factors  that  are  considered  to  be  relevant.  Actual  results  may  differ  from  these  estimates.  In  particular, 
information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty considered by management in preparing the 
financial statements is described below.

Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in 
the year in which the estimates are revised if the revision affects only that year, or in the year of revision 
and in future years if the revision affects both current and future years.

i) Going concern and liquidity

Significant  estimates  were  required  in  forecasting  cash  flows  used  in  the  assessment  of  going  concern 
including  tin  and  tantalum  prices,  the  levels  of  production,  operating  costs  and  capital  expenditure 
requirements. Additionally, judgement has been applied in assessing the risks associated with COVID-19, 
together with mitigating steps available to the Group if required. Refer to going concern considerations 
noted earlier in Note 2 for further details.

ii) Decommissioning and rehabilitation obligations

Estimating  the  future  costs  of  environmental  and  rehabilitation  obligations  is  complex  and  requires 
management to make estimates and judgements as most of the obligations will be fulfilled in the future 
and contracts and laws are often not clear regarding what is required. The resulting provisions (see Note 
18) are further influenced by changing technologies, political, environmental, safety, business and statutory 
considerations.

The  Group’s  rehabilitation  provision  is  based  on  the  net  present  value  of  management’s  best  estimates 
of  future  rehabilitation  costs.  Judgement  is  required  in  establishing  the  disturbance  and  associated 
rehabilitation costs at period end, timing of costs, discount rates and inflation. In forming estimates of the 
cost  of  rehabilitation  which  are  risk  adjusted,  the  Group  assessed  the  Environmental  Management  Plan 
and reports provided by internal and external experts. Actual costs incurred in future periods could differ 
materially from the estimates, and changes to environmental laws and regulations, life of mine estimates, 
inflation rates, and discount rates could affect the carrying amount of the provision. 

The  carrying  amount  of  the  rehabilitation  obligations  for  the  Group  at  28  February  2021  was  £180  917 
(2020: £86 005). In determining the amount attributable to the rehabilitation liability, management used a 
discount rate of 12.8% (2020: 9.35%), an inflation rate of 6% (2020: 5.5%) and an estimated mining period 
of 18 years, being the Phase 1 expansion life of mine. A 1% increase or decrease in the inflation rate used 
would result in a £34 074 difference in the liability. A 2% increase or decrease in the discount rate used 

Determining whether an exploration and evaluation asset is impaired requires an assessment of whether 
there  are  any  indicators  of  impairment,  including  specific  impairment  indicators  prescribed  in  IFRS  6: 
Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources. If there is any indication of potential impairment, an 
impairment test is required based on value in use of the asset. The valuation of intangible exploration assets 
is  dependent  upon  the  discovery  of  economically  recoverable  deposits  which,  in  turn,  is  dependent  on 
future tin prices, future capital expenditures, environmental and regulatory restrictions, and the successful 
renewal of licences. The Group considers the South African exploration and evaluation assets to be non-
core  as  it  continues  to  primarily  focus  on  developing  its  Namibian  assets.  Accordingly,  the  capitalised 
exploration and evaluation expenditure relating to the South African assets has been impaired to nil on 
the basis that the Group does not intend to incur any further expenditure on its South African licences. 
The directors have concluded that there are no indications of impairment in respect of the carrying value 
of Namibian intangible assets at 28 February 2021 based on planned future development of the Namibian 
projects, and current and forecast tin prices. Exploration and evaluation assets are disclosed fully in Note 11.  

iv) Impairment assessment for property, plant and equipment

Management have reviewed the Uis mine for indicators of impairment and have considered, among other 
factors, the operations to date at the Uis mine, planned Phase 1 Stage II expansion of the Uis operations, 
forecast  commodity  prices  and  market  capitalisation  of  the  group.  In  undertaking  the  indicator  review, 
management have also reviewed the underlying LoM valuation model for Uis and have concluded that no 
indicators of impairment have been noted at year end. The LoM valuation model is on a fair value less cost 
to develop basis and includes assessments of different scenarios associated with capital development and 
expansion opportunities. 

The forecasts required estimates regarding forecast tin and tantalum prices, ore resources and production, 
and operating and capital costs. The  discounted cash flows use a discount rate of 11.7% post tax nominal. 
Under the base case forecast using a forecast tin price of $23 889 rising to $24 505 by 2025 and forecast 
tantalum price of $150 000, the forecast indicates headroom as at 28 February 2021. Whilst the valuation 
based on the operations limited to the Phase 1 Stage II expansion is sensitive to pricing with a 6% reduction 
being required to reach break-even point, the planned additional expansion indicates significant headroom 
and reduced pricing sensitivity. 

v) Depreciation

Judgement is applied in making assumptions about the depreciation charge for mining assets when using 
the  unit-of-production  method  in  estimating  the  ore  tonnes  held  in  reserves.  The  relevant  reserves  are 
those included in the current approved LoM plan which relates to the Phase 1 expansion. Judgement is also 
applied when assessing the estimated useful life of individual assets and residual values. The assumptions 
are reviewed at least annually by management and the judgement is based on consideration of the LoM 
plan, as well as the nature of the assets. The reserve assumptions included in the LoM plan are evaluated 
by management.

58

59

vi) Commercial production 

x) Determining the incremental borrowing rate to measure lease liabilities

Judgement is required to determine when a construction asset is in the location and condition intended. 
No specific guidance exists within IFRS, particularly as to what it means for an asset to be “in the location 
and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating as intended by management”, but it is common 
to  simply  refer  to  the  achievement  of  “commercial  production”  as  the  point  at  which  the  assets  are 
commissioned, i.e. ready for their intended use. 

In  determining  the  commercial  production  date,  management  uses  certain  criteria  that  are  required  to 
be  met  before  commercial  production  is  achieved.  Commercial  production  is  determined  to  have  been 
reached when the asset is operating at its designed production level. The Uis Tin Mine achieved commercial 
production based on production levels at 1 December 2020 and commercial production was declared. At 
that date, capitalisation of cost to the mining asset ceased and depreciation commenced.

vii) Determination of ore reserves

The estimation of ore reserves primarily impacts the depreciation charge of evaluated mining assets, which 
are depreciated based on the quantity of ore reserves. Reserve volumes are also used in calculating whether 
an impairment charge should be recorded where an impairment indicator exists.

The Group estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information, compiled by appropriately 
qualified  persons,  relating  to  geological  and  technical  data  on  the  size,  depth,  shape  and  grade  of  the 
ore body and related to suitable production techniques and recovery rates. The estimate of recoverable 
reserves is based on factors such as tin prices, future capital requirements and production costs, along with 
geological assumptions and judgements made in estimating the size and grade of the ore body. 

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating ore reserves and mineral resources. Consequently, 
assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly if or when new information 
becomes available.

viii) Valuation of inventories

Judgement  is  applied  in  making  assumptions  about  the  value  of  inventories  and  inventory  stockpiles, 
including tin prices, plant recoveries and processing costs, to determine the extent to which the Group values 
inventory and inventory stockpiles. The Group uses forecast tin prices to determine the net realisable value 
of the run-of-mine stockpile and the tin concentrate inventory on hand at year end. Inventory stockpiles 
are measured using actual mining and processing costs.

ix) Determining the lease term

In determining the lease term, management considers all facts and circumstances that create an economic 
incentive to exercise, or not to exercise, an extension option. Extension options are only included in the 
lease term where the company is reasonably certain that it will extend or will not terminate the lease when 
the lease expires. For all leases, the most relevant factors include:
• 
•  The group considers other factors including historical lease durations, related costs and the possible 

If there are significant penalties to terminate, the group is typically reasonably certain to extend.

business disruption as a result of replacement of the leased asset.

The  lease  term  is  reassessed  on  an  ongoing  basis,  especially  when  the  option  to  extend  becomes 
exercisable, or on occurrence of a significant event or a significant change in circumstances which affects 
this assessment, and that is within the control of the group.

The  interest  rate  implicit  in  leases  is  not  available,  therefore,  the  group  uses  the  relevant  incremental 
borrowing rate (IBR) to measure its lease liabilities. The IBR is estimated to be the interest rate that the 
group would pay to borrow:
•  over a similar term
•  with similar security
• 
• 

the amount necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to the right of use asset
in a similar economic environment

The IBR, therefore, is considered to be the best estimate of the incremental rate and requires management’s 
judgement as there are no observable rates available.

xi) Determining the fair value of trade receivables classified at fair value through profit and loss

The  consideration  receivable  in  respect  of  certain  sales  for  which  performance  obligations  have  been 
satisfied  at  year  end  and  for  which  the  Group  has  received  prepayment  under  the  terms  of  the  offtake 
agreement, remain subject to pricing adjustments with reference to market prices at the date of finalisation. 
Under the Group’s accounting policies, the fair value of the consideration is determined, and the remaining 
receivable  is  adjusted  to  reflect  fair  value.  Management  estimated  the  forward  price  based  on  the  LME 
3-month  tin  price  at  year  end.  As  at  28  February  2021  the  Group  recognised  a  receivable  at  fair  value 
through profit or loss of £531 583 (2020: nil).

3. ADOPTION OF NEW AND REVISED STANDARDS

The  Company  adopted  the  following  amendments  to  standards  that  became  effective  for  periods 
commencing on or after 1 March 2020:

IFRS 3   

  Amendments to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”: Definition of business 

1 January 2020

IAS 1 and IAS 8    Amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” and IAS 8  

1 January 2020

  “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors”: 

  Definition of material  

Conceptual 

  Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards 

1 January 2020

Framework

The  adoption  of  these  amendments  did  not  have  a  material  impact  on  the  financial  statements  of  the 
Group.

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS NOT APPLIED

The following standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective  
have not been early adopted by the Group:

Annual Improvements to IFRS: 2018-2020 Cycle
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (Amendments to IFRS 3)
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets 
(Amendment – Onerous Contracts – Cost of Fulfilling a Contract)
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment (Amendment – Proceeds before Intended Use)
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (Amendment – Classification of Liabilities 
as Current or Non-Current)

1 January 2022
1 January 2022
1 January 2022

1 January 2022
1 January 2023
1 January 2023

The Directors anticipate that the adoption of these standards and interpretations in future periods will have 
no material impact on the financial statements of the Group based on current operations.

60

61

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. SEGMENTAL REPORTING

The  reporting  segments  are  identified  by  the  management  steering  committee  (who  are  considered  to 
be the chief operating decision-makers) by the way that the Group’s operations are organised. As at 28 
February 2021, the Group operated within two operating segments: tin exploration and mining activities in 
Namibia and South Africa.

Segment results

The following is an analysis of the Group’s results by reportable segment.

South Africa
£

Namibia 
£

Total
£

As at 29 February 2020
Intangible assets - exploration and 

evaluation

Other reportable segmental assets

Other reportable segmental liabilities

Unallocated net liabilities

Total consolidated net assets

3 108 713  

4 332 305 

 7 441 018  

60 323 

(64 997)

 -  

 3 104 039 

 13 041 793

(774 676)

 - 
 16 599 422 

13 102 116

(839 673)

(759 812)

18 943 649

South Africa
£

Namibia 
£

Total
£

Unallocated  net  assets/liabilities  are  mainly  comprised  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents  and  the  working 
capital facility which are managed at a corporate level.

34 863

(8 786)
(3 069 232) 
(3 043 155) 

4 950 244 

(5 715 954)

-

(765 710)

 4 985 107

(5 724 740)

(3 069 232)

(3 808 865)

5. REVENUE

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

Year ended 28 February 2021 Results
Revenue

Associated costs

Impairment of exploration licence

Segmental profit/(loss)

Year ended 29 February 2020 Results
Revenue

Associated costs

Segmental profit/(loss)

 21 696 

(14 006)

7 690

 47 336 

(436 922)

(389 586)

 69 032 

(450 928)

(381 896)

The reconciliation of segmental gross loss to the Group’s loss before tax is as follows:

Segmental profit/(loss)

Unallocated costs

Finance income

Finance costs

Loss before tax

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

(3 808 865)

(1 802 718) 

 - 

(184 300) 

(5 795 883)

(381 896)

(1 411 635)

  3 793 

 (40 719) 

(1 830 457)

Revenue from the sale of tin

Revenue from the sale of sand

Total revenue from customers

Other revenue – change in fair 

value of customer contract

Total revenue

4 744 609

 34 863 
 4 779 472 

205 635 
 4 985 107

47 336

21 696  
 69 032  

-
 69 032

The revenue from the sale of tin and sand is recognised at the point in time at which control transfers. Refer 
to Note 2 for further details.

Other revenue relates to the change in the fair value of amounts receivable under the offtake agreement 
between  the  date  of  initial  recognition  and  the  period  end  resulting  from  forecast  market  prices  at  the 
estimated final pricing date. Refer to Note 2 for details of trade receivables recorded at fair value through 
profit or loss.

6. OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

The loss for the year has been arrived at after charging:

Unallocated  costs  are  mainly  comprised  of  corporate  overheads  and  costs  associated  with  being  listed  in 
London.

As at 28 February 2021
Intangible assets - exploration and 

evaluation

Other reportable segmental assets

Other reportable segmental liabilities

Unallocated net liabilities

Total consolidated net assets

South Africa
£

Namibia 
£

Total
£

 11 309

5 229 152

5 240 461 

15 494 907 

(1 651 016)

 - 
 19 073 043  

15 571 367

(1 713 318)

(2 608 263)
 16 490 247

76 460 

(62 302)

 - 

25 467 

62

Staff costs

Depreciation of property, 

plant & equipment

Professional fees

Travelling expenses

Uis administration expenses

Auditor’s remuneration

Other costs

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

1 201 489

275 987

127 902

44 793

361 509

69 250

458 832

  793 687 

128 130

88 550  

98 988 

199 984

 52 873 

453 015

2 539 762

 1 815 227 

63

 
 
 
Other costs are mainly comprised of corporate overheads necessary to run the South African head office 
and the costs associated with being listed in London.

9. TAXATION

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.

7. STAFF COSTS

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

Staff costs capitalised under property, plant and 

 1 094 729 

 1 185 121 

equipment

Staff costs capitalised under intangible assets

Staff costs recognised as administrative expenses

Staff costs included in cost of sales

Share-based payment charge capitalised under 

property, plant and equipment

 261 844 

 666 746 

 285 216 

 45 820 

 104 521 

 575 561 

-

186 835 

Share-based payment charge capitalised under 

 18 204 

31 839 

intangible assets

Share-based payment charge recognised as 

207 407 

 184 888 

administrative expenses

Share issue charge (including amounts capitalised in 

327 336

65 470

the prior year)

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

Factors affecting tax for the year:
The tax assessed for the year at the Guernsey 

corporation tax charge rate of 0%, as explained below:

Loss before taxation

(5 795 883)

(1 830 457)

Loss before taxation multiplied by the Guernsey 

corporation tax charge rate of 0%

Effects of:

Differences in tax rates (overseas jurisdictions)

Tax losses carried forward

Tax for the year

-

-

(549 615)

549 615

-

(327 821)

327 821

-

Accumulated losses in the subsidiary undertakings for which there is an unrecognised deferred tax asset 
are £3 244 873 (2020: £1 797 379).

2 907 301

2 334 235

10. LOSS PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

Key  management  personnel  have  been  identified  as  the  Board  of  Directors,  Frans  van  Daalen  (Chief 
Operating Officer of the Group) and Robert Sewell (Chief Financial Officer of the Group). Details of key 
management remuneration are shown in Note 26.

The average number of staff during the period was 108 (2020: 66) with an average total cost per employee 
for the year of £26 862 (2020: £25 970).

The calculation of a basic loss per share of 0.76 pence (2020: loss per share of 0.29 pence), is calculated 
using the total loss for the year attributable to the owners of the Company of £5 694 962 (2020: £1 781 962) 
and the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year of 749 085 933 (2020: 623 591 330).

Due to the loss for the year, the diluted loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share. The number 
of potentially dilutive ordinary shares, in respect of share options, warrants and shares to be issued as at 
28 February 2021 is 86 882 728 (2020: 69 080 819). These potentially dilutive ordinary shares may have a 
dilutive effect on future earnings per share.

Emoluments  of  £289  104  including  £172  323  of  share  options  and  shares  to  be  issued  (2020:  £190  932 
including  £65  281  of  share  options  and  shares  to  be  issued)  were  paid  in  respect  of  the  highest-paid 
director during the year.

11. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

8. FINANCE COST

Interest on lease liability

Interest on environmental rehabilitation liability

Bank interest

Interest on loan notes

Amortisation of warrant charge

Other interest

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

 39 691 

 7 593 

 31 696 

49 863 

49 541

 5 916 

 33 128 

7 029

562

-

-

- 

As at 28 February 2019
Additions for the year

Exchange differences

As at 29 February 2020
Additions for the year

Impairment for the year

Exchange differences

Exploration and 
evaluation assets
£

Computer 
software
£

Total
£

 7 012 317 
 522 131 

(209 954)

 7 324 494 
977 797

(3 069 232)

(108 373)

 - 

 125 894 

 7 012 317 
 648 025 

(9 370)

(219 324)

 116 524 
4 598

 7 441 018
982 395

-

(3 069 232)

(5 347)

(113 720)

 184 300 

40 719

As at 28 February 2021

5 124 686

115 775

5 240 461

64

65

 
 
 
For the purposes of impairment testing, the intangible exploration and evaluation assets are allocated to 
the Group’s cash-generating units, which represent the lowest level within the Group at which the intangible 
exploration  and  evaluation  assets  are  measured  for  internal  management  purposes,  which  is  not  higher 
than the Group’s operating segments as reported in Note 4.

The amounts for intangible exploration and evaluation assets represent costs incurred on active exploration 
projects. Amounts capitalised are assessed for impairment indicators under IFRS 6 at each year end as 
detailed in the Group’s accounting policy. 

The Uis Tin Mine reached commercial production on 1 December 2020. Nameplate capacity (taking into 
account mining volumes, plant throughput and recovery) of Stage I of Phase 1 was defined as 60 tonnes of 
tin concentrate at a grade of 60% tin in concentrate per month (36 tonnes of contained tin). 63.9 tonnes 
of  tin  concentrate  was  produced  in  November  2020  and  production  of  60  tonnes  or  more  per  month 
has  been  consistently  achieved  subsequently.  Management  has  therefore  determined  that  commercial 
production was reached at this point. Up to this date, costs directly related to the development of the mine 
were capitalised to the mining asset. Included in these costs was capitalised interest of £254 539 (2020: 
£55 235). 

The Group considers the South African exploration and evaluation assets to be non-core as it continues to 
primarily focus on developing its Namibian assets. Accordingly, the capitalised exploration and evaluation 
expenditure relating to the South African assets of £3.069m has been impaired to nil on the basis that the 
Group does not intend to incur any further expenditure on its South African licences. 

A deduction to assets under construction of £2 805 630 (2020: £38 143) has been recorded in respect of 
the revenues generated during the development phase prior to commercial production being established 
with a corresponding charge to cost of sales to reflect the contribution to development cost provided by 
such revenues.

The directors have concluded that there are no indicators of impairment in respect of the carrying value of 
the Namibian exploration and evaluation assets at 28 February 2021 based on planned future development 
of the projects and current and forecast tin prices. 

From 1 December 2020, depreciation of the mining asset commenced in accordance with IAS 16. The total 
depreciation charge for the year was split between administrative expenses and cost of sales.  £275 987 
was included in administrative expenses, while the balance of £622 541 was included in cost of sales as it 
was a cost that was incurred for mining and processing purposes.

12. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C

r
e
d
n
u
t
e
s
s
A

i

g
n
n
M

i

d
n
a
L

i

g
n
n
o
i
s
s
i
m
m
o
c
e
D

t
e
s
s
A

e
s
u
-
f
o
-
t
h
g
R

i

t
e
s
s
A

t
n
e
m
p
u
q
E

i

r
e
t
u
p
m
o
C

e
r
u
t
i
n
r
u
F

s
e
l
c
i
h
e
V

l
a
t
o
T

13. INVENTORIES

Tin concentrate on hand

Run-of-mine stockpile

Consumables

t
e
s
s
a
g
n
n
M

i

i

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

373 310

427 423

195 965

996 698

 185 338 

-

 61 572 

246 910

Cost

As at 28 February 2019
Additions for the year
Foreign exchange 
differences

As at 29 February 2020
Additions for the year
Disposals for the year
Transfer between 
categories of assets
Foreign exchange 
differences

As at 28 February 2021

Accumulated 
Depreciation
As at 28 February 2019
Charge for the year
Foreign exchange 

differences

As at 29 February 2020
Charge for the year
Foreign exchange 

differences

As at 28 February 2021

Net Book Value

As at 28 February 2021
As at 29 February 2020
As at 28 February 2019

 11 862 
12 438
13 439

13 439
- 

5 495 771
7 370 105

-
-

75 180
10 715

 - 
 276 547 

66 198
35 768

71 234
20 290

85 504
- 

5 807 326
7 713 425

(1 001)

(864 947)

12 438
 -   
 -   

12 000 929
 2 028 009 
 -   

-
-
123 803
-

(6 398)

79 497
 90 323 
 -   

(20 583)
 255 964 
 259 957 
-

(7 593)

(6 776)

(6 369)

(931 667)

94 373
 46 543 
(1 955) 

84 748
 21 598 
 -   

79 135
 -   
 -   

12 607 084
 2 570 233 
(1 955) 

-
-
(576)
 11 862 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 
 -   

(13 550 114)

13 550 114

-

-

-

-

-

-

(478 824)
 -

1 236

13 675 153

(2 777)
 167 043 

(9 250)

 506 671 

(3 903)
 135 058 

(3 681)

(3 662)

(501 437)

102 665 

 75 473 

14 673 925

- 

- 
- 

- 

-

-

 -  

12 000 929
5 495 771

-

-
-

717 864

6 118 

 723 982 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

 58 220 

11 040
32 573

4 116
15 962

7 127
21 375

22 283
128 130

(4 333)

53 887 
108 794

(3 274)

40 339
35 622

(1 468)

18 610
17 566

(2 122)

26 380
18 682

(11 197)

139 216
898 528

- 
 -   

(1 407)

 161 274 

(1 528)
 74 433 

(669)

 35 507 

(1 034)
 44 028 

1 480
 1 039 224 

12 951 171
-
-

 167 043 
79 497
75 180

 345 397 
202 077
-  

 60 625 
54 034
55 158

 67 158 
66 138
67 118

 31 445 
52 755
78 377

13 634 701 
12 467 868
5 785 043

14. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Trade receivables

Trade receivables at fair value 

through profit or loss

Other receivables

VAT receivables

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

185 451

531 583

204 779

266 339

1 188 152

 42 772 

-

111 614 

 494 336 
 648 722 

The  Directors  consider  that  the  carrying  amount  of  trade  and  other  receivables  approximates  to  their 
fair value due to their short-term nature. No allowance for any expected credit losses against any of the 
receivables is provided due to no history of default or non-payment from Thaisarco. The trade receivable 
from Thaisarco was settled after year end.  

Trade receivables at fair value through profit or loss relates to the change in the fair value of trade receivables 
under  the  offtake  agreement  between  the  date  of  initial  recognition  and  the  period  end  resulting  from 
forecast market prices at the estimated final pricing date.

The  total  trade  and  other  receivables  denominated  in  South  African  Rand  amount  to  £79  888  (2020: 
£65 288), denominated in Namibian Dollars amount to £429 819 (2020: £517 322) and denominated in US 
Dollars amount to £627 566 (2020: nil).

66

67

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in borrowings

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

Cash on hand and in bank

1 351 200

574 600

Cash and cash equivalents (which are presented as a single class of assets on the face of the Statement 
of Financial Position) comprise cash at bank. The Directors consider that the carrying amount of cash and 
cash equivalents approximates their fair value. The total cash and cash equivalents denominated in South 
African Rand amount to £119 976 (2020: £48 887), the total cash and cash equivalents denominated in 
Namibian Dollars amount to £13 156 (2020: £240 623) and the total cash and cash equivalents denominated 
in US Dollars amount to £551 832 (2020: £132).

16. BORROWINGS

Working capital facility
Loan note instrument

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

1 710 247
2 159 242

3 869 489

1 230 961
-

1 230 961

On 16 August 2019, a working capital facility of N$35 000 000 (c. £1.659 million) and a VAT facility for 
N$8 000 000 (c. £379 000) was entered into between the Company’s subsidiary, AfriTin Mining (Namibia) 
Pty Limited and Nedbank Namibia.

The VAT facility is secured by assessed/audited VAT returns (refunds) which have not been paid by Namibia 
Inland Revenue. Nedbank Namibia provides a facility amounting to 70% of the total unpaid refunds. Any 
drawdowns against this facility are repaid to the bank upon receipt of cash from Namibia Inland Revenue. 

The working capital facility and the VAT facility were reviewed on 31 July 2020 and were renewed for a 
further  12-month  period.  The  facility  is  due  for  annual  review  in  July  2021  and  discussions  are  currently 
underway with the lender in securing the rollover of the facility. Interest accrues on these loans at the prime 
rate charged by Nedbank Namibia.

Both AfriTin, as the parent company of AfriTin Mining (Namibia) Pty Limited, and Bushveld Minerals Limited 
(“Bushveld”), a shareholder holding approximately 5% of the Company provide collateral in the form of a 
joint suretyship.

In  addition  to  the  facility  amount  of  N$35  000  000,  Nedbank  Namibia  have  provided  AfriTin  Mining 
(Namibia) Pty Limited with a N$4 117 500 guarantee to Namibia Power Corporation Pty Limited in relation 
to a deposit for the supply of electrical power. As a result of the guarantee provided by Nedbank Namibia, 
no cash was paid over for the deposit.

On 5 May 2020, £2.05 million financing was secured by way of a loan note facility. The notes, which are 
issued in tranches of £50 000, bear an interest rate of 10% per annum to be accrued and payable in full on 
redemption, and have a 12-month term.

Balance at 29 February 2020

1 230 961 

Cash flows

Proceeds from working capital facility

Proceeds from loan note instrument

Repayment of working capital facility

Non-cash flows

Interest accrued on loan note instrument

Warrants issued during the year

 5 858 028 

     2 050 000 

(5 378 742) 

146 836 

(162 480) 

Warrants charge amortised during the year

             124 886 

Balance at 28 February 2021

 3 869 489 

17. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Trade payables

Other payables

Accruals

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

1 094 390

141 677

248 415

1 484 482

 570 779 

 71 117 

 252 934 
 894 830 

Trade  and  other  payables  principally  comprise  amounts  outstanding  for  trade  purchases  and  on-going 
costs. The average credit period taken for trade purchases is 30 days.

The Group has financial risk management policies in place to ensure that payables are paid within the pre-
arranged credit terms. No interest has been charged by any suppliers as a result of late payment of invoices 
during the year.

The  Directors  consider  that  the  carrying  amount  of  trade  and  other  payables  approximates  to  their  fair 
value.

The total trade and other payables denominated in South African Rand amount to £232 071 (2020: £165 988) 
and £1 185 802 (2020: £622 762) is denominated in Namibian Dollars.

68

69

 
           
 
          
      
18. ENVIRONMENTAL REHABILITATION LIABILITY

Balance at 28 February 2019
Increase in provision

Interest expense

Foreign exchange differences

Balance at 29 February 2020
Increase in provision

Interest expense

Foreign exchange differences

Balance at 28 February 2021

£

 75 180 
 10 717 

7 029

(6 921)
 86 005 
90 323

7 593

(3 004)

180 917

Provision for future environmental rehabilitation and decommissioning costs are made on a progressive 
basis.  Estimates  are  based  on  costs  that  are  regularly  reviewed  and  adjusted  appropriately  for  new 
circumstances.  The  environmental  rehabilitation  liability  is  based  on  disturbances  and  the  required 
rehabilitation as at 28 February 2021.

The  rehabilitation  provision  represents  the  present  value  of  decommissioning  costs  relating  to  the 
dismantling of mechanical equipment and steel structures related to the Phase 1 pilot plant, the demolishing 
of civil platforms and reshaping of earthworks. A provision for this requires estimates and assumptions to 
be made around the relevant regulatory framework, the magnitude of the possible disturbance and the 
timing, extent and costs of the required closure and rehabilitation activities. In calculating the appropriate 
provision, cost estimates of the future potential cash outflows based on current studies of the expected 
rehabilitation  activities  and  timing  thereof  are  prepared.  These  forecasts  are  then  discounted  to  their 
present  value  using  a  risk-free  rate  specific  to  the  liability.  In  determining  the  amount  attributable  to 
the  rehabilitation  liability,  management  used  a  discount  rate  of  12.8%  (2020:  9.35%),  an  inflation  rate  of 
6%  (2020:  5.5%)  and  an  estimated  mining  period  of  18  years,  being  the  Phase  1  expansion  life  of  mine. 
Actual rehabilitation and decommissioning costs will ultimately depend upon future market prices for the 
necessary rehabilitation works and timing of when the mine ceases operation.

19. LEASE LIABILITY

The Company assessed all rental agreements and concluded that the following rentals fall within the scope 
of IFRS 16: Leases and therefore a lease liability has been recognised:

Lease term

Option to extend/
terminate

Incremental
borrowing
rate

Office building

5 years

Option to extend not specified in contract. Term 

13.75%

Workshop facility

2 years

Option to extend not specified in contract. Term 

7.5%

of lease determined to be 5 years. 

Residential housing 

5 years

The lease will continue automatically after the 

8.5%

of lease determined to be 2 years.

initial period for an open-ended period. Either 

party must provide written notice if they wish to 

terminate. Lease term determined to be 5 years.

Balance at 28 February 2019
Additions

Interest expense

Lease payments

Foreign exchange differences

Balance at 29 February 2020
Additions

Interest expense

Lease payments

Foreign exchange differences

Balance at 28 February 2021

Office Building
£

Workshop
£

Housing
£

Total
£

-

276 547

33 128

(68 015)

(17 987)

223 673
-

24 419

(64 201)

(10 749)

173 142

-

-

-

-

-

-

108 252

3 923

(30 319)

818

82 674

-

-

-

-

-

-

151 705

11 349

-

276 547

33 128

(68 015)

(17 987)

223 673
259 957

39 691

(34 080)

(128 600)

1 287

130 261

(8 644)

386 077

The following is the split between the current and the non-current portion of the liability:

Non-current liability

Current liability

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

260 512

125 565

386 077

 181 544 

 42 129 

 223 673 

A total of £168 792 (2020: £113 205) was included in administrative expenses during the year for the cost 
of short-term rentals for vehicles and lifting equipment. 

20. SHARE CAPITAL 

Balance at 28 February 2019
Capital raise - 22 May 2019

Share issue costs 

Shares issued to Hannam & Partners

Shares issued to directors/employees

Balance at 29 February 2020
Capital Raise - 3 August 2020

Shares issued to suppliers

Share issue costs 

Shares issued to directors/employees

Loan note conversion

Balance at 28 February 2021

Number of 

ordinary shares of 

no par value issued 

and fully paid

 544 588 525 
 99 613 074 

-

 327 868 

 8 616 906 
 653 146 373 
145 238 089

15 273 480

-

16 133 440

44 898 630

874 690 012

Share Capital

£

 17 337 718 
 2 988 392 

(111 687)

 10 000 

 262 816 
 20 487 239 
3 050 000

320 743

(253 317)

403 336

1 600 000

25 608 001

70

71

Authorised: 1 220 486 913 ordinary shares of no par value
Allotted, issued and fully paid: 874 690 012 shares of no par value

On 22 April 2021, notice was received from warrant holders to exercise 1 186 666 warrants at an exercise 
price of 4.5p and 500 000 warrants at an exercise price of 1.95p.

On 22 May 2019, AfriTin Mining Limited completed an equity fundraising by way of a direct subscription of 
99 613 074 ordinary shares of no par value in the Company at a price of 3 pence per share.

22. SHARE-BASED PAYMENT RESERVE

Director share options

On  10  December  2019,  8  616  906  ordinary  shares  of  no  par  value  were  issued  to  various  directors  and 
employees in lieu of payment of director fees and part settlement of salaries. Furthermore 327 868 shares 
were  issued  to  Hannam  and  Partners,  in  accordance  with  the  terms  of  their  broker  agreement  with  the 
Company. These shares were issued at a price of 3.05 pence per share.

On 3 August 2020, the Company completed an equity fundraising by way of a placing and direct subscription 
of 145 238 089 ordinary shares of no par value in the Company at a price of 2.1 pence per share.

The following director share options were granted during the year ended 29 February 2020:

Date of grant
Number granted
Vesting period
Contractual life
Estimated fair value per option (pence)

 18 October 2019 
 3 200 000 
 1 year 
 5 years 
 1.4790 

 18 October 2019 
 3 200 000 
 2 years 
 5 years 
 1.3340 

 18 October 2019 
 3 200 000 
 3 years 
 5 years 
 1.2510 

On 3 August 2020, 15 273 480 ordinary shares of no par value were issued to various suppliers as settlement 
of invoices for services rendered. These shares were issued at a price of 2.1 pence per share.

The estimated fair values were calculated by applying the Black Scholes pricing model. The model inputs 
were:

On  4  January  2021,  16  133  440  ordinary  shares  of  no  par  value  were  issued  to  various  directors  and 
employees in lieu of payment of director fees and part settlement of salaries. These shares were issued at 
a price of 2.5 pence per share.

On 15 February 2021, AfriMet Resources AG elected to convert its portion of outstanding convertible loan 
notes, totalling £1 600 000 into fully paid ordinary shares. These shares were issued at a price of 4 pence 
per share.

21. WARRANTS

The following warrants were granted during the year ended 28 February 2021:

Date of grant
Number granted
Contractual life
Estimated fair value per warrant (£)

10 December 2020
2 500 000 
2.4 years
0.0101 

7 July 2020 
2 500 000 
2.8 years  
0.0122 

31 May 2020 
2 500 000 
2.9 years 
0.0068 

5 May 2020 
13 000 000 
3 years 
0.0069 

The warrants in issue during the year are as follows:

Outstanding at 28 February 2019
Exercisable at 28 February 2019
Granted during the year
Expired during the year
Exercised during the year
Outstanding at 29 February 2020
Exercisable at 29 February 2020
Granted during the year
Expired during the year
Exercised during the year
Outstanding at 28 February 2021
Exercisable at 28 February 2021

 5 671 939 
 5 671 939 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 5 671 939 
 5 671 939 
20 500 000
(1 871 939)
-
24 300 000
24 300 000

The warrants outstanding at year end have an average exercise price of £0.023, with a weighted average 
remaining contractual life of 2.14 years.

In the year ended 28 February 2021, there was a charge of £162 480 (2020: nil) accounted for due to the 
issue of warrants.

Date of grant
Share price at grant date (pence)
Exercise price (pence)
Expiry date
Expected volatility
Expected dividends
Risk-free interest rate

 18 October 2019 
 3.15 
 3.75 
 18 October 2024 
60%
 Nil 
1.24%

 18 October 2019 
 3.15 
 4.50 
 18 October 2024 
60%
 Nil 
1.24%

 18 October 2019 
 3.15 
 5.00 
 18 October 2024 
60%
 Nil 
1.24%

The director share options in issue during the year are as follows:

Outstanding at 28 February 2019
Exercisable at 28 February 2019
Granted during the year
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Expired during the year
Outstanding at 29 February 2020
Exercisable at 29 February 2020
Granted during the year
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Expired during the year
Outstanding at 28 February 2021
Exercisable at 28 February 2021

 17 500 000 
 - 
 9 600 000 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 27 100 000 
 13 125 000 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
27 100 000
8 389 999

On 4 January 2021, 10 600 000 share options held by the Chief Executive Officer, Anthony Viljoen were 
repriced by the Remuneration Committee to align company and shareholder expectations with long-term 
incentivisation goals. The exercise price and the first exercise date were changed, however, the contractual 
life of the options remained unchanged. The fair value of the repriced options (calculated using the Black 
Scholes  method)  decreased  from  the  initial  fair  valuation.  As  such,  no  adjustment  to  amortising  of  the 
initial fair value over the vesting period was made.

The director share options outstanding at year end have an average exercise price of £0.045 (2020: £0.053), 
with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.77 years (2020: 3.77 years).

A  director  must  remain  as  a  director  of  the  Company  for  the  share  options  to  vest.  In  the  event  that  a 
director  ceases  to  be  a  director  during  the  vesting  period,  the  Board  reserves  the  right  to  determine 
whether the share options will be terminated or not. There are no market-based vesting conditions on the 
share options.

72

73

Employee share options

Director shares to be issued

The following employee share options were granted during the year ended 29 February 2020:

Date of grant   
Number granted 
Vesting period 
Contractual life
Estimated fair value per option (pence) 

18 October 2019
4 110 001
1 year
5 years
1.4790

18 October 2019
4 110 000
2 years
5 years
1.3340

18 October 2019
4 109 999
3 years
5 years
1.2510

The estimated fair values were calculated by applying the Black Scholes pricing model. The model inputs 
were:

Date of grant   
Share price at grant date (pence) 
Exercise price (pence) 
Expiry date 
Expected volatility 
Expected dividends
Risk-free interest rate 

18 October 2019
3.15
3.75
18 October 2024
60%
Nil
1.24%

18 October 2019
3.15
4.50
18 October 2024
60%
Nil
1.24%

18 October 2019
3.15
5.00
18 October 2024
60%
Nil
1.24%

The employee share options in issue during the year are as follows:

Outstanding at 28 February 2019
Exercisable at 28 February 2019
Granted during the year
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Expired during the year
Outstanding at 29 February 2020
Exercisable at 29 February 2020
Granted during the year
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Expired during the year
Outstanding at 28 February 2021
Exercisable at 28 February 2021

 22 500 000 
 - 
 12 330 000 
 - 
 - 
-
 34 830 000 
 11 250 000 
-
 - 
 - 
-
 34 830 000 
  - 

On  4  January  2021,  34 830 000  share  options  held  by  employees  were  repriced  by  the  Remuneration 
Committee  to  align  company  and  shareholder  expectations  with  long-term  incentivisation  goals.  The 
exercise price and the first exercise date were changed, however the contractual life of the options remained 
unchanged. The fair value of the repriced options (calculated using the Black Scholes method) decreased 
from the initial fair valuation. As such, no adjustment to amortising of the initial fair value over the vesting 
period was made.

The employee share options outstanding at the year-end have an average exercise price of £0.034 (2020: 
£0.053), with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.96 years (2020: 3.96 years).

An employee must remain in employment with the Company for the share options to vest. There are no 
market-based vesting conditions on the share options.

Directors’ fees of £16 342 (2020: £24 050) are owing to the directors at the end of the year. These fees will 
be settled through the issuing of shares. The corresponding credit has been recorded in the share-based 
payment reserve.

Employee shares to be issued

Employee salaries of £17 720 (2020: £13 961) are owing to employees at the end of the year. These salaries 
will  be  settled  through  the  issuing  of  shares.  The  corresponding  credit  has  been  recorded  in  the  share-
based payment reserve.

23. NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

Non-controlling interest that is material in the group relates to the Small Miners of Uis (“SMU”) who own 
15% of UTMC. SMU is a non-profit association incorporated in Namibia. The entity was set up by the Ministry 
of Mines and Energy to act on behalf of small-scale miners across Namibia.

Other includes the following minority interests which are not material:

- Cannosia Trading 62 CC who own 16% of Renetype
- African Women Enterprise Investments (Pty) Ltd who own 10% of Renetype
- Lerama Resources (Pty) Ltd who own 50% of Jaxson
- Tamiforce (Pty) Ltd who own 26% of Zaaiplaats

As at 28 February 2021

UTMC

Other

Total

Amount attributable to all shareholders:
Loss after tax

Non-current assets

Current assets

Total assets

Non-current liabilities

Current liabilities

Total liabilities

(659 673) 

(7 150) 

(666 822) 

2 678 021 

15 233 

          2 693 254 

          2 524 054 
           5 202 076 

         -   

15 233 

          2 524 054 
           5 217 308 

          5 136 254 

43 275 

          5 179 529 

             997 620 
          6 133 874 

11 964 

55 239 

           1 009 584 
           6 189 113 

Net liabilities

             931 798 

40 006 

              971 804 

Amount attributable to non-controlling interest:
Loss after tax

Net liabilities

           (98 951) 

(1 970) 

           (100 921) 

        139 770 

11 574 

          151 344 

74

75

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As at 29 February 2020

UTMC

Other

Total

Amount attributable to all shareholders:
Loss after tax

Non-current assets

Current assets

Total assets

Non-current liabilities

Current liabilities

Total liabilities

(299 949) 

(13 243) 

(313 192) 

 2 165 378 

 1 037 166 

 3 202 544 

 699 699 
 2 865 077 

 -   
 1 037 166 

 699 699 
 3 902 243 

 2 531 291 

 1 057 484 

 3 588 775 

 612 209 

 3 143 500 

 14 058 
 1 071 542 

 626 267 
 4 215 042 

Net liabilities

 278 423 

 34 376 

 312 799 

Categories of financial instruments

The Group holds the following financial assets:

Measured at amortised cost:

Trade and other receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Measured at fair value through profit or loss:

Trade and other receivables

Total financial assets

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

390 230

1 351 200

531 583

2 273 013

 154 386 

 574 600 

-
 728 986 

(44 992) 

 41 764 

(3 502) 

 10 049 

(48 495) 

 51 812 

Under  its  customer  sale  arrangement,  the  Group  receives  a  provisional  payment  upon  satisfaction 

of  its  performance  obligations  based  on  the  spot  price  at  that  date.  This  occurs  prior  to  the  final  price 

Amount attributable to non-controlling interest:
Loss after tax

Net liabilities

24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Group is exposed to the risks that arise from its use of financial instruments. This note describes the 
objectives, policies and processes of the Group for managing those risks and the methods used to measure 
them.  Further  quantitative  information  in  respect  of  these  risks  is  presented  throughout  these  financial 
statements.

Capital risk management

The  Group  manages  its  capital  to  ensure  that  entities  in  the  Group  will  be  able  to  continue  as  going 
concerns while maximising returns to shareholders. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the 
Group may issue new shares or arrange debt financing.

The  capital  structure  of  the  Group  consists  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents  and  equity,  comprising  issued 
capital, issued convertible loan notes, borrowings and retained losses.

The Group is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

Significant accounting policies

Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted including the criteria for recognition, 
the basis of measurement and the basis for recognition of income and expenses for each class of financial 
asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in Note 2.

Principal financial instruments

The principal financial instruments used by the Group, from which financial instrument risk arises, are as 
follows:
•  Trade and other receivables
•  Cash and cash equivalents
•  Trade and other payables
•  Borrowings
•  Lease liability
•  Convertible loan notes

determination, with the Group then subsequently receiving or paying the difference between the final price 

and quantity and the provisional payment. As a result of the pricing structure, the instrument is classified 

at fair value through profit or loss and measured at fair value with resulting changes in fair value recorded 

as other revenue.

Trade receivables at fair value through profit or loss fail the criteria for being measured at amortised cost 

owing  to  the  variability  resulting  from  final  pricing  adjustments.  Financial  instruments  measured  at  fair 

value are presented by level within which the fair value measurement is categorised. The levels of fair value 

measurement are determined as follows: 

•  Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. 

•  Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, 

either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). 

•  Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable 

inputs). 

The Group’s contract receivable at 28 February 2021 is recorded at fair value through profit or loss and fair 

valued based on the estimated forward prices that will apply under the terms of the sales contracts on the 

product reaching the port of destination. The trade receivables fair value reflects amounts receivable from 

the customer adjusted for forward prices expected to be realised. 

The forward price is based on the LME 3-month tin price as at 28 February 2021. Given the short period to 

final pricing, the time value of money is not considered to be significant. 

Fair value of this trade receivable at fair value through profit or loss is categorised at Level 1. During the 

year there were no transfers between levels of fair value hierarchy.

76

77

The Group holds the following financial liabilities:

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

Measured at amortised cost:

Trade and other payables 

Borrowings

Lease liability

Total financial liabilities

1 484 482

3 869 489

386 077

5 740 048

 894 830 

1 230 961

223 673

2 349 464 

Maturity analysis of the contractual undiscounted cash flows:

Up to
3 months

Between 3
and 12 months

Between 1
and 2 years

Between 2
and 5 years

Total

Trade and other payables

1 484 482

Borrowings

Lease Liability

2 159 242

29 834

3 673 558

-

1 710 247

95 730

1 805 977

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 484 482

3 869 489

128 066

128 066

132 447

386 077

132 447

5 740 048

General objectives, policies and processes

The Board has overall responsibility for the determination of the Group’s risk management objectives and 
policies.  The  Board  receives  reports  through  which  it  reviews  the  effectiveness  of  the  processes  put  in 
place and the appropriateness of the objectives and policies it sets.

The overall objective of the Board is to set policies that seek to reduce risk as far as possible without unduly 
affecting the Group’s competitiveness and flexibility. Further details regarding these policies are set out 
below:

Credit risk

Currency
Sterling

USD

South African Rand

Namibian Dollars

28 February 2021
£

29 February 2020
£

666 236

551 832

119 976

13 156

1 351 200

 284 958 

 132 

 48 887 

 240 623 

 574 600 

Please refer to note 14 for the concentration of credit risk relating to trade receivables.  

At  28  February  2021,  the  Group  held  no  collateral  as  security  against  any  financial  asset.  The  carrying 
amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, net of any allowances for losses, represents 
the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk without taking account of the value of any collateral obtained. 
The  Group  applies  IFRS  9  to  measure  expected  credit  losses  for  receivables  and  these  are  regularly 
monitored and assessed. There has been no impairment of financial assets during the year. Management 
considers the above measures to be sufficient to control the credit risk exposure.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity  risk  is  the  risk  that  the  Group  will  encounter  difficulty  in  meeting  its  financial  obligations  as 
they fall due. Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board of Directors. The 
Board manages liquidity risk by regularly reviewing the Group’s gearing levels, cash-flow projections and 
associated headroom and ensuring that excess banking facilities are available for future use.

The Group maintains good relationships with its banks and its cash requirements are anticipated via the 
budgetary process. At 28 February 2021, the Group had £1 351 200 (2020: £574 600) of cash reserves.

Market risk

The  Group’s  activities  expose  it  primarily  to  the  financial  risk  of  changes  in  commodity  prices,  foreign 
currency exchange rates and interest rates.

The Group’s principal financial assets are bank balances and trade and other receivables.

Interest rate risk

Credit risk arises principally from the Group’s cash balances. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty 
fails to repay its obligation to the Group in respect of amounts owed. The Group gives careful consideration 
to which organisations it uses for its banking services in order to minimise credit risk. Credit risk relating 
to other receivables is minimal. 

The concentration of the Group’s credit risk is considered by counterparty, geography and currency. The 
Group  has  split  its  cash  reserves  across  multiple  banks  in  an  effort  to  mitigate  credit  risk.  The  Pound 
Sterling and US Dollar accounts are held with a bank in Mauritius which has a rating of Baa1 (Moody’s), the 
Rand account is held with a bank in South Africa which has a rating of Ba2 (Moody’s), and the Namibian 
Dollar account is held with a bank in Namibia with a rating of Ba3 (Moody’s). While the credit ratings of the 
countries in which the cash is held have been downgraded during the year, the banks chosen remain stable 
and do not present any further risks.

The concentration of credit risk was as follows:

The Group was exposed to minimal interest rate risk during the year. For this reason, no sensitivity analysis 
has been performed regarding interest rate risk.

Foreign exchange risk

The Group has foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Exposure to exchange rate fluctuations 
therefore arises. The carrying amount of the Group’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and 
liabilities, all in Pound Sterling, is shown below.

78

79

 
 
Cash and cash equivalents

Other receivables

Trade and other payables

Borrowings

Year ended
28 February 2021
£

Year ended
29 February 2020
£

684 964

1 137 272

(1 417 873)

(1 710 247)

(1 305 884)

 289 642 

 88 274 

(788 750)

(1 230 961)

(1 641 795)

the outstanding amount was settled through the issuing of 18 963 699 ordinary shares of no par value in 
the Company at a conversion price of 4 pence per ordinary share and the remaining portion totalling £1.8m 
(including £0.328m of accrued interest) was redeemed in cash.

Settlement of loan notes
On 25 May 2021, the 2020 loan note facility of £2.05m and associated interest of £0.216m was settled in 
full in cash.

Issue of shares
On 25 May 2021, 327 868 ordinary shares of no par value were issued in lieu of broker fees at a price of 6 
pence. 

The  Group  is  exposed  to  a  level  of  foreign  currency  risk.  Due  to  the  minimal  level  of  foreign  exchange 
transactions, the Directors currently believe the foreign currency risk is at an acceptable level.

26. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The  Group  does  not  enter  into  any  derivative  financial  instruments  to  manage  its  exposure  to  foreign 
currency risk.

Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been 
eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.

The following table details the Group’s sensitivity to a 10% increase and decrease in the Pound Sterling 
against the Rand and the Namibian Dollar. 10% is the sensitivity rate used when reporting foreign currency 
risk internally to key management personnel and represents management’s assessment of the reasonable 
possible  change  in  foreign  currency  rates.  The  sensitivity  analysis  includes  only  outstanding  foreign 
currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at  year end for a 10% change in foreign 
currency rates.

Rand denominated 
monetary items
£

Rand currency impact
Strengthening
£

Rand currency impact
Weakening
£

Assets

Liabilities

199 863

(232 071)

(32 208)

219 849

(255 278)

(35 429)

179 877

(208 864)

(28 987)

Namibian Dollar 
denominated 
monetary items
£

Namibian Dollar 
currency impact
Strengthening
£

Namibian Dollar 
currency impact
Weakening
£

Assets

Liabilities

442 975

(2 896 049)

(2 453 074)

487 273

(3 185 654)

(2 698 381)

398 678

(2 606 444)

(2 207 767)

25. EVENTS AFTER BALANCE SHEET DATE

Exercise of warrants
On 22 April 2021, notice was received from warrant holders to exercise 1 186 666 warrants at an exercise 
price of 4.5 pence and 500 000 warrants at an exercise price of 1.95 pence.

Equity Fundraising
On  12  May  2021,  £13  million  (before  expenses)  was  raised  by  way  of  a  private  placement.  216  666  667 
ordinary shares of no par value in the company at a price of 6 pence per share were issued.

Settlement of convertible loan notes
On 25 May 2021, the remaining £2.2m of the £3.8m 2019 convertible loan notes was settled. £0.759m of 

Goldiblox Pty Limited (“Goldiblox”) is a related party due to Frans van Daalen, key management personnel 
of AfriTin Mining Limited being a 50% shareholder of Goldiblox. During the prior year, the Group acquired 
a DMS plant from Goldiblox for £155 678. There were no transactions during the current year. At year end, 
the Group did not owe Goldiblox any funds (2020: nil).

Bushveld Minerals Limited (“Bushveld”) is a related party due to Anthony Viljoen, Chief Executive Officer, 
being a Non-Executive Director on the Bushveld Board. During the period, Bushveld charged the Group 
£82 423 (2020: £85 596) for the use of office space. At period end, the Group owed Bushveld £112 962 
(2020: £71 762). Furthermore, Bushveld provide suretyship of N$30m (approx £1.42m) as collateral for the 
Nedbank Namibia working capital facility.

The remuneration of the key management personnel of the Group, which includes the Directors, Frans van 
Daalen and Robert Sewell, is set out below.

28 February 2021

Non-Executive Directors
Glen Parsons (Chairman)

Terence Goodlace

Laurence Robb

Roger Williams (resigned 

28 September 2020)

Executive Director
Anthony Viljoen (CEO)

Other key management 

personnel
Robert Sewell (CFO)

Frans van Daalen (COO)

Shares

Issued in 

Shares 

Share 

Relation to 

Issued in 

Director

Option 

Director

Relation to 

Charge

Fees/Salary

Bonus

Fees/

Salary

£

£

10 893

10 761

10 761

10 761

40 000

-

13 000

-

£

-

-

-

-

£

-

28 750

12 000

14 583

Other

Fees

£

- 

- 

- 

- 

Total

£

50 893

39 511

35 761

25 344

26 090

17 365

128 868

116 781

- 

289 104

19 599

22 099

-

-

65 919

81 178

86 745

112 322

110 964

70 365

275 965

371 181

- 

- 

-

172 263

215 599

828 475

80

81

 
29 February 2020

Shares

Issued in 

Shares 

Share 

Relation to 

Issued in 

Director

Option 

Director

Relation to 

Charge

Fees/Salary

Bonus

Fees/

Salary

£

£

 17 626 

 15 471 

 15 471 

 15 471 

40 000 

 - 

 13 000 

 25 000 

£

- 

- 

- 

- 

£

 - 

 28 772 

 12 000 

 22 000 

 - 

 - 

Other

Fees

£

 - 

 - 

Foreign currency translation reserve

The  foreign  currency  translation  reserve  comprises  all  foreign  exchange  differences  arising  from  the 
translation of entities with a functional currency other than Pound Sterling.

Retained earnings/accumulated deficit

The retained earnings/accumulated deficit represents the cumulative profit and loss net of distribution to 
owners.

Total

£

57 626 

 44 243 

 62 471 

 40 471 

Non-Executive Directors
Glen Parsons (Chairman)

Terence Goodlace

Laurence Robb

Roger Williams

Executive Director
Anthony Viljoen (CEO)

Other key management 

personnel
Robert Sewell (CFO)

Frans van Daalen (COO)

41 440

23 841

- 

 125 650 

 - 

 190 932 

43 078 

 68 944 

55 147

10 994

217 501 

167 983

- 

- 

-

87 257 

 114 656 

- 

 - 

185 482 

 194 594 

368 335 

22 000 

 775 819 

27. RESERVES WITHIN EQUITY

Share capital

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares 
or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

Convertible loan note reserve

The convertible loan note reserve represents net proceeds on outstanding convertible loan notes.

On 26 November 2019, the Group raised £3.8m through the issuing of convertible loan notes which mature 
in May 2021. The instruments entitle the holders to a 10% coupon. Under the terms of the instrument, the 
Group can elect to settle the loan note into a fixed number of shares at a 4 pence conversion rate. The 
Group can elect to redeem the loan notes early in cash at a premium of 10%. As there is no obligation to 
settle in cash, the loan notes have been accounted for in equity as an increase in the convertible loan note 
reserve.

Warrant reserve

The warrant reserve represents the cumulative charge to date in respect of unexercised share warrants at 
the balance sheet date.

Share-based payment reserve

The  share-based  payment  reserve  represents  the  cumulative  charge  to  date  in  respect  of  unexercised 
share options at the balance sheet date as well as fees/salaries owed to directors/employees to be settled 
through the issuing of shares.

82

83

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

 (Incorporated in Guernsey under registered number 63974) 

Registered office: 

PO Box 282, Oak House, Hirzel Street, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 3RH

30 July 2021

THIS DOCUMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING FORM OF PROXY IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES 
YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. 

If you are in any doubt as to what action you should take, you are recommended to seek your own financial 
advice  immediately  from  your  stockbroker,  bank  manager,  solicitor,  accountant  or  other  independent 
financial adviser who specialises in advising on shares or other securities and who is, in the case of UK 
shareholders, authorised under the Financial Services and Market Act 2000. 

If  you  have  sold  or  transferred  your  shares  in  AfriTin  Mining  Limited,  please  forward  this  document  at 
once to the purchaser or transferee or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or 
transfer was effected, for delivery to the purchaser or transferee. If you have sold or transferred part of 
your registered holding of shares, please consult the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the 
sale or transfer was effected. 

Notice of an Annual General Meeting of AfriTin Mining Limited to be held at 11:00 am on 25 August 2021 
PO  Box  282,  Oak  House,  Hirzel  Street,  St  Peter  Port,  Guernsey  GY1  3RH.  Members  of  the  Company  are 
requested to return the enclosed Form of Proxy which, to be valid, must be completed and returned in 
accordance with the instructions printed thereon so as to be received as soon as possible by the Company’s 
Registrars,  Link  Group,  PXS,  10th  Floor,  Central  Square,  29 Wellington  Street,  Leeds,  LS1  4DL,  but  in  any 
event  so  as  to  be  received  by  the  company  Secretary  at  the  registered  office  in  accordance  with  the 
provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation not less than 48 hours (excluding any non-business 
days) before the time appointed for the Annual General Meeting. Completion and return of a Form of Proxy 
will not preclude a member of the Company from attending and voting in person at the Annual General 
Meeting should they so wish. 

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY: ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING IN LIGHT 
OF COVID-19

The Company is carefully monitoring the COVID-19 situation, including the guidance issued by the States 
of Guernsey, and will continue to do so in the lead-up to the Meeting. 

At the date of this Notice, restrictions on movement within Guernsey have been lifted but persons arriving 
into the Bailiwick of Guernsey are presently required to self-isolate for periods of up to 14 days depending 
on  the  country  from  and/or  through  which  they  have  travelled  (and  subject  to  one  or  more  negative 
COVID-19 tests). With effect from 1 July 2021, persons who are fully vaccinated and who in the previous 
14 days have only been within the Common Travel Area of the UK, Ireland, Jersey and the Isle of Man will 
be  able  to  travel  to  Guernsey  without  having  to  self-isolate  or  undergo  a  COVID-19  test.  However,  this 
concession may change prior to the date of the Meeting. 

It is expected that shareholders in Guernsey, or those who wish to travel to Guernsey for the Meeting subject 
to quarantine measures, will be able to attend the Meeting as normal. However, the Board recognises that 
this may not be possible for the majority of shareholders and has put in place the following precautions 
(the “COVID-19 Precautions”):

1.  The Company urges shareholders to vote by proxy and to appoint the chairman of the Meeting as their 
proxy for that purpose. If a shareholder appoints someone other than the chairman of the Meeting as 
their proxy, that proxy, if not present in Guernsey, may not be able physically to attend the Meeting or 

NOTICE OF
ANNUAL
GENERAL
MEETING

84

85

 
 
 
cast the shareholder’s vote. All votes on the resolutions contained in this Notice will be held by poll, so 
that all voting rights exercised by shareholders who are entitled to do so at the Meeting will be counted. 
2.  The Board encourages all shareholders to exercise their votes by proxy, and to submit any questions 
in respect of the Meeting in advance. This should ensure that your votes are registered in the event 
that attendance at the Meeting is not possible. Shareholders are encouraged to use the online voting 
facilities  detailed  below  where  possible  rather  than  submitting  a  paper  proxy  card  to  the  Company 
Secretary, the Oak Trust. 

3.  Shareholders who do choose to attend the Meeting in person are asked to comply with the States of 
Guernsey’s guidance on respecting personal space and practising good hand hygiene, and with any 
distancing requirements requested by the chairman of the Meeting. 

The  security  arrangements  proposed  by  the  Board  are  subject  to  constant  review,  and  should  they  be 
subject  to  change  in  line  with  changing  guidance  from  the  States  of  Guernsey,  or  in  the  event  that  the 
situation  surrounding  COVID-19  should  affect  the  plans  to  hold  the  Meeting  at  the  proposed  date  and 
time or at the proposed address, the Company will update shareholders through a market announcement 
and will provide further details on the Company’s website. The Board reserves the right, should it become 
necessary, to restrict attendance at the Meeting as part of security arrangements pursuant to Article 46 of 
the Articles of Incorporation of the Company (the “Articles”).

PROXY

To register your vote electronically, log on to our registrar’s website at www.signalshares.com and follow 
the instructions on screen. To be valid, your proxy must be registered not later than 48 hours (excluding 
non-working days) before the time fixed for the Meeting. Do not show these details to anyone unless you 
wish them to give proxy instructions on your behalf. 

NOTICE OF MEETING

A Form of Proxy for use by shareholders is enclosed. To register a vote electronically, log on to the Registrar’s 
website at www.signalshares.com and follow the instructions on screen.

ORDINARY RESOLUTIONS

EXTRAORDINARY RESOLUTIONS

7.  That the Directors be and are hereby authorised to exercise all powers of the Company to grant rights 
to subscribe for shares to directors or employees of the Company in accordance with Article 4.2 of the 
Articles as part of the previously adopted directors and employees share option schemes (together the 
“Options”), and to issue shares pursuant to the exercise of such Options, as if the pre-emption rights 
contained in Article 5.2 of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company did not apply to such issue or 
grant, provided the total Options outstanding at any point in time may not confer rights to subscribe 
for shares exceeding 10% of the number of issued shares of the Company at that time, and provided 
that the authority hereby conferred, unless previously renewed, revoked or varied by the Company by 
extraordinary resolution, shall expire at the end of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company 
or, if earlier, at the close of business on the date falling 15 months from the date of the passing of this 
Resolution (unless previously renewed, revoked or varied by the Company by extraordinary resolution), 
save  that  the  Company  may  before  such  expiry  make  an  offer  or  agreement  which  would  or  might 
require Options to be granted after such expiry and the Directors may issue or grant the Options in 
pursuance of such an offer or agreement, and issue shares pursuant to the exercise of Options, as if the 
authority conferred by the above resolution had not expired.
If Resolution 6 is passed, the Directors of the Company be and are hereby authorised to exercise all 
powers  of  the  Company  to  issue  or  grant  Equity  Securities  in  the  capital  of  the  Company  pursuant 
to the issue or grant referred to in Resolution 6 as if the pre-emption rights contained in Article 5.2 
of  the  Articles  of  Incorporation  of  the  Company  did  not  apply  to  such  issue  or  grant  provided  that 
the  authority  hereby  conferred,  unless  previously  renewed,  revoked  or  varied  by  the  Company  by 
extraordinary resolution, shall expire at the end of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company 
or, if earlier, at the close of business on the date falling 15 months from the date of the passing of this 
Resolution, save that the Company may before such expiry make an offer or agreement which would 
or might require Equity Securities to be issued or granted after such expiry and the Directors may issue 
or grant Equity Securities in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if the authority conferred by 
the above resolution had not expired. This Resolution is in substitution for all unexercised authorities 
previously granted to the Directors of the Company to issue or grant Equity Securities in the capital of 
the Company as if the pre-emption rights contained in Article 5.2 of the Articles of Incorporation of the 
Company did not apply to such issue or grant.

8. 

1.  That  Nick  Babbé  be  appointed  as  Chairman  of  the  Annual  General  Meeting  in  accordance  with  and 

By order of the Board 

pursuant to article 19.1.5 of Articles of Incorporation of the Company.

2.  To receive and adopt the Annual Financial Statements of the Company and the Directors’ report and 

the report of the Auditor for the year ended 28 February 2021. 

3.  That Terence Goodlace shall be re-elected as a Director of the Company, having retired by rotation and 

offered himself for re-election.

4.  That Messrs BDO LLP be reappointed as Auditor to the Company. 
5.  That the Directors be authorised to approve the remuneration of the Company’s Auditor. 
6. 

In  substitution  for  any  and  all  previous  authorisations,  the  Directors  of  the  Company  be  and  are 
hereby  authorised  to  exercise  all  powers  of  the  Company  to  issue,  grant  rights  to  subscribe  for,  or 
to convert any securities into, up to 556 167 456 shares (together “Equity Securities”) in the capital 
of  the  Company  in  accordance  with  Article  4.2  of  the  Articles  of  Incorporation  of  the  Company, 
such  authority  to  expire,  unless  previously  renewed,  revoked  or  varied  by  the  Company  by  ordinary 
resolution, at the  end of  the next Annual General Meeting of  the Company or, if earlier, at the close 
of business on the date falling 15 months from the date of the passing of this Resolution, but in each 
case, during this period the Company may make offers, and enter into agreements, which would, or 
might, require Equity Securities to be issued or granted after the authority given to the Directors of 
the Company pursuant to this Resolution ends and the Directors of the Company may issue or grant 
Equity Securities under any such offer or agreement as if the authority given to the Directors of the 
Company pursuant to this Resolution had not ended. This Resolution is in substitution for all unexercised 
authorities  previously  granted  to  the  Directors  of  the  Company  to  issue  or  grant  Equity  Securities.  

AR VILJOEN 

Director 

30 July 2021

86

87

 
 
REGISTERED OFFICE
PO Box 282

Oak House

Hirzel Street, St Peter Port

Guernsey GY1 3RH

REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE - South Africa 
Illovo Edge Office Park

Building 3, 2nd Floor 

Corner Harries and Fricker Road

Illovo, South Africa

REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE - Namibia
Shop 48, Second Floor

Old Power Station Complex

Armstrong Street

Windhoek, Namibia

NOMINATED ADVISER
 WH Ireland Limited
24 Martin Lane 

EC4R ODR London

United Kingdom

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
BDO LLP

55 Baker Street

W1U 7EU London

United Kingdom

LEGAL COUNSEL - South Africa 
Edward Nathan Sonnenberg

150 West Street Sandown

Johannesburg, 2196

South Africa

LEGAL COUNSEL - United Kingdom
Gowling WLG

4 More London Riverside

SE1 2AU London

United Kingdom

CORPORATE ADVISER AND JOINT BROKER  
Hannam & Partners

2 Park Street, Mayfair

W1K 2HX London

United Kingdom

JOINT BROKER
Turner Pope Investments 

8 Frederick’s Place

EC2R 8AB London

United Kingdom

INVESTOR RELATIONS
Tavistock

1 Cornhill, Langbourn

EC3V 3NR London

United Kingdom

COMPANY
INFORMATION

88

89