2019
ANNUAL REPORT
2 | AMERIS BANK
Atlanta, Georgia is the corporate headquarters for both Ameris Bancorp and Ameris Bank. Of all community banks
headquartered in Atlanta, Ameris Bank has the largest deposit market share.
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 3
4 | AMERIS BANK
DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,
2019 was a record-breaking year for Ameris, full of opportunity, change and growth. We successfully launched
the new Ameris Bank brand and accomplished the largest conversion and integration in our company’s history,
while delivering a record $222.9 million in adjusted net income. Growth in tangible book value was over 10%.
The momentum created in 2019 propels strategies and initiatives that will continue to drive our focus on shareholder
value for years to come.
Our financial results were outstanding. For the year, adjusted net income increased over 52%, as net interest income
increased by 47% and noninterest income grew by over 67%. This growth in noninterest income is largely attributable
to the 122% growth in mortgage banking activities. Overall organic loan growth was over 9% and credit quality remains
strong. These financial results were accomplished while we improved our adjusted efficiency ratio to 55.67%.
In July, we completed the acquisition of Fidelity Southern Corporation and announced our company’s plans to
launch a sharper, stronger, more recognizable brand to better represent our size and scope in the financial industry.
Throughout the year, the Ameris and Fidelity teams joined forces, fully integrating in November. The immense talent
and synergy of our new combined team is outstanding, and we look forward to a prosperous future.
Ameris Bank’s purpose is bringing financial peace of mind to our communities one person at a time. We believe this
statement is reflective of our success in 2019 and why we will be successful into the future. Our portfolio remains
diversified and our bankers are well positioned to garner market share in high-growth areas and enjoy the stability
and core strength found in our nonmetropolitan communities.
We look to 2020 to be the year we ensure we are positioned for continued safety and soundness. Four important
strategic initiatives are underway, focusing on core deposit funding, asset quality, operating efficiencies and growth
in tangible book value. Customer service remains a top priority. We continue to evaluate our business with fresh eyes,
seeking enhancements in our technological offerings and strengthening our sustainability efforts and societal impact.
In closing, I want to express my sincere gratitude to our dedicated teammates. It’s remarkable how much we have
accomplished, not only in terms of financial success but in our continued dedication to helping our customers and
the communities we serve. I am grateful for our sustained energy and passion as we aim to continue on our path of
producing top quartile results. I am inspired by our board and thankful for their strategic oversight. To our customers
and shareholders, thank you for trusting us with your financial success. We are in business because of you.
With sincere appreciation,
H. Palmer Proctor Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Ameris Bancorp and Ameris Bank
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 5
Ameris Bank’s new brand deployed in November 2019, with signage crews starting to install the new logo on facilities across our footprint.
In Jacksonville, Florida, signage crews prepared for the installation by helicopter of the new Ameris Bank logo atop the 27-story
Riverplace Tower.
6 | AMERIS BANK
A NEW BANKING TRADITION
When Ameris Bank and Fidelity Bank merged in 2019, an updated Ameris brand launched to better represent
our new size and scope in the financial industry. The new brand reflects Ameris’s history, leverages existing
reputational affinity for both Ameris and Fidelity, and represents what Ameris has
always been and who we will continue to be – a bold bank that isn’t afraid to break through convention
to create solid, innovative solutions.
The Lion Story
The lion is now a central part of the Ameris brand. It is the universal symbol of strength and courage; pride
and fierce determination. It represents Ameris taking bold steps and diverging from the pack. Being different
requires courage. Seeing past decades of tired banking norms for a better way takes determination. Ameris
will continue to deliver on these promises and on our commitment to provide financial peace of mind to our
communities, one person at a time.
Unconventional Thinking
Everything we do begins with standing by our convictions and the promises we make to our employees,
customers and shareholders. Our energetic, dynamic team of problem-solvers is committed to going the
extra mile and removing hurdles to reaching aspirations. We are proud of our legacy but know that we must
look outside banking norms to stay ahead of what’s next.
Seamless Transactions
Regardless of how Ameris customers choose to engage with us – in person, on the phone or on a screen –
we are dedicated to providing seamless and personalized interactions. This gives our customers the choice
of how, when and where they interact with us. A point of differentiation and pride, Ameris empowers
employees to make decisions, so our customers don’t have to jump through hurdles to sign on the dotted
line, get solid advice or simply receive an answer.
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 7
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 7
The leadership and synergy across all lines of business and enterprise support teams ensured a successful integration of Fidelity Bank
and positions us for tremendous growth in the future. Pictured left to right: Fraud Review Manager Katrina Mitchell, North Georgia
Corporate Bank President Michael Tesler, Director of Retail Banking Geary Kinnett, Retail Area Manager Brenda Harris, Mortgage
President Robert Odom and Director of Government Guaranteed Lending Katrina Winberg.
8 | AMERIS BANK
A WINNING TEAM
2019 marked a year of tremendous growth, opportunity and change, including the largest conversion
and integration in Ameris’s history. The year was dedicated to blending the Ameris and Fidelity teams,
advancing our products and services and providing exceptional customer experiences. All this was
accomplished while producing record financial results and earnings per share.
Synergy Across the Organization
Our company’s successful integration and future impetus is made possible by the opportunistic synergy
across all teams and divisions. Now supporting over $18 billion in assets, our enterprise teams continue
to support the advancement of cash management, commercial and retail banking services. Ameris’s
diversified lines of business, strong offerings and persistent, resourceful bankers increased noninterest
income by 67.3% and adjusted net earnings by 52.5% in 2019 compared with 2018, and lowered our adjusted
efficiency ratio to a strong 55.67%.
Record Breaking Mortgage Services
In 2019, Ameris Bank produced over $4.3 billion in mortgage loans companywide and ranked as a
top lender in several categories and markets* including Atlanta, Georgia, Jacksonville and Gainesville,
Florida, and Columbia and Charleston, South Carolina. Our model for success is supported by in-
house underwriting, funding and closing, and personalized one-on-one service. This is enhanced by a
comprehensive offering of loan types, down payment assistance programs and specialized lending services.
New Wealth Management Division
Ameris Bank now offers customers wealth management services, including financial planning, strategic
credit, trust and estate services, and retirement and investment management. Ameris’s wealth management
approach is guided by trust, honoring our client’s unique goals, objectives and expectations. We know there
is a clear wealth management path for each client, and our team of highly skilled advisors will find it.
*Rankings provided by the 2019 Metrostudy report and CoreLogic statistics. Metrostudy provides primary and secondary market information to the
housing and residential construction industry, and CoreLogic provides real estate and mortgage financial analytics.
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 9
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 9
Ameris Bank proudly financed The Dwellings in Tallahassee, Florida, a nonprofit that creates affordable, sustainable housing in a 100%
sustainable community. The 130-unit tiny house community and community center, which addresses the needs of people with challenges
preventing them from living safe, healthy and independent lives, recently earned the Urban Land Institute North Florida 2019 Award for
Excellence, Public Sector/Non Profit. Market President Steven Lohbeck (left) is pictured with CESC Chairman of the Board of Directors
Rick Kearney.
Ameris has recently lent over $57.3 million to businesses directly supporting their advancement of solar practices, stream mitigation and
energy efficiencies.
10 | AMERIS BANK
FIERCELY COMMITTED
The success earned in 2019 creates strong, powerful and steady momentum for the future. With solid
strategic planning, Ameris leadership and execution teams are energized and excited for all the opportunity
that lies ahead. We boast critical mass in our operating markets, fully leveraging high-growth metropolitan
areas and the stability found in our other markets. Ameris’s future is bright.
Cultural Growth
We are nurturing a team of colleagues who are inspired, developed and recognized in ways that support
our culture of excellence and diversity. This commitment is rooted in The Ameris ApproachTM and our vision
to reach outside tradition to do what it takes to create solid solutions and meaningful experiences. We
empower. We deliver on promises. At the end of the day, relationships mean everything to us, and we do
what it takes to take care of others.
Technological Advances
Under the leadership of our chief innovation officer, Ameris is actively undergoing a technology refresh
of both our internal systems and customer-facing services. In early 2020, Ameris’s Innovation Center
of Excellence was launched, devoted to advancing our technology to meet the growing demands and
expectations of our customers. Digital money management tools are now available within personal online
and mobile banking, empowering customers to take control of their finances and simplify their lives.
Robotic automation will be deployed, streamlining internal operations and processes.
Sustainability and Societal Impact
Ameris is devoted to meaningfully contributing to the communities we serve and reducing our impact on
the environment. We are dedicated to advancing our corporate citizenship program, continuing to cultivate
and preserve diversity, and identifying internal practices and lending programs that support environmental
stewardship. In 2019, over 2.6 million food items were raised in our annual Helping Fight Hunger campaign,
benefiting more than 140 foodbanks across the Southeast. Ameris proudly committed $1.65 million to
support rural Georgia hospitals through the Georgia HEART program and looks to donate an additional
$2 million in 2020.
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 11
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$25.0
$20.0
$15.0
$10.0
$5
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
.
3
3
0
7
$
2015 2016
2017
2018
2019
NET INTEREST INCOME
PLUS NONINTEREST INCOME
(In millions of dollars)
.
0
4
1
$
2015 2016
2017
2018
2019
TOTAL DEPOSITS
(In billions of dollars)
.
1
8
0
2
$
2015 2016
2017
2018
2019
TANGIBLE BOOK VALUE
(In dollars)
12 | AMERIS BANK
Revenue (Net Interest Income Plus Noninterest Income)
Total revenue increased $241 million, or 52%, during 2019, which was largely driven by growth in our earning
assets, as well as growth in our mortgage line of business. Net interest income increased 47% during 2019,
consistent with growth in average earning assets. Noninterest income increased over 67%, as our lines
of business, including mortgage and SBA, produced growth in noninterest income. Mortgage noninterest
income increased $70 million during 2019 reflecting both the favorable interest rate environment and an
increased presence resulting from the Fidelity acquisition.
Deposits
We continued to focus on core deposit growth and growing customer relationships. Excluding deposits
gained from the Fidelity acquisition completed during 2019, total deposits grew $334 million. Our funding
mix continued to improve with noninterest bearing deposits representing nearly 30% of our total deposits at
the end of 2019, up from 26% at the end of 2018. While competition for deposits remains brisk, we grew our
deposits at a faster pace than loans during 2019.
Tangible Book Value
Protecting and growing shareholder value through tangible book value continues to be a vital focus for our
company. Tangible book value increased by $1.98 to $20.81 per share at year-end. This growth in tangible
book value occurred during a year when we completed the largest acquisition in our company’s history,
increased our dividend payout and made disciplined repurchases of our outstanding common stock under
our common stock repurchase plan.
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 13
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Pictured from left to right.
First Row:
Executive Chairman James B. Miller Jr.
Lead Independent Director Leo J. Hill, Transamerica
Mutual Funds (Lead Independent Director)
H. Palmer Proctor Jr., Ameris Bancorp Chief Executive
Officer, Ameris Bank Chief Executive Officer
Second Row:
William I. Bowen Jr., Bowen-Donaldson Home for Funerals
(Funeral Services)
Rodney D. Bullard, Chick-Fil-A Inc. Vice President of
Community Affairs, Chick-Fil-A Foundation
Executive Director (Food Services)
Wm. Millard Choate, Choate Construction Company
Founder and President (Construction)
Third Row:
R. Dale Ezzell, Wisecards Printing (Print Services)
Daniel B. Jeter, Standard Discount Corporation
(Consumer Finance)
Robert P. Lynch, Lynch Management Company
(Automobile Sales)
Fourth Row:
Elizabeth A. McCague, McCague and Company, LLC
Founder and Mediator (Consulting and Mediation)
Gloria A. O’Neal, Retired Executive Vice President
Fidelity Bank
Fifth Row:
William H. Stern, Stern & Stern and Associates (Real Estate)
Jimmy D. Veal, Beachview Event Rentals & Design
(Event Services)
14 | AMERIS BANK
EXECUTIVE TEAM
Pictured from left to right.
First Row:
H. Palmer Proctor Jr., Chief Executive Officer
Lawton E. Bassett III, Ameris Bancorp Banking Group
President and Ameris Bank President
Nicole S. Stokes, CPA, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Second Row:
Ross L. Creasy, Executive Vice President and
Chief Innovation Officer
Jon S. Edwards, Executive Vice President and
Chief Credit Officer
James A. LaHaise, Executive Vice President and
Chief Strategy Officer
Third Row:
Cindi H. Lewis, Executive Vice President, Chief
Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary
William D. McKendry, Executive Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer
Fourth Row:
Michael T. Pierson, Executive Vice President and
Chief Governance Officer
Jody L. Spencer, Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 15
COMMUNITY BOARDS
OF DIRECTORS
Our Community Boards of Directors are an extension of our bank. They are leaders within our communities
and vital to our mission of growing banking relationships. We are honored to have their support, service and
expertise.
Jacksonville, FL
Regional President:
Kendall L. Spencer
Directors:
Joseph P. Helow,
Chairman
Robert M. Bradley Jr.
Phillip H. Cury
John A. Delaney
A. Hugh Greene
Major B. Harding Jr.
Robert P. Lynch
J. Charles Wilson, CPA
Moultrie, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Timothy B. Powers
Directors:
Thomas W. Rowell,
Chairman
Thomas L. Estes, M.D.
Robert A. Faircloth
R. Plenn Hunnicutt
Daniel B. Jeter
Lynn L. Jones Jr.
J. Mark Mobley Jr.
Director Emeritus:
Brooks Sheldon
Albany & Cordele, GA
Dothan, AL
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Directors:
R. Dale Ezzell, Chairman
Dale Armstrong
C. Phillip Hayes
Alan D. Wells
Douglas, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
David B. Batchelor
City President:
M. Shane Shook
Directors:
Kevin L. Gilliard,
Chairman
Faye H. Hennesy
Alfred Lott Jr.
Donnie H. Smith
Gainesville & Ocala, FL
Regional President:
Kendall L. Spencer
Directors:
Thomas P. McIntosh,
Chairman
Adra B. Kennard
G. Thomas Mallini
Breck A. Weingart
Director Emeritus:
James D. Salter
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Chris M. Misamore
Directors:
Reid E. Mills, Chairman
Bonny B. Dorough
Gregory R. Garland
Y. Duncan Moore Jr.
J. Austin Turner
Cairo, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Robert D. Vice
City President:
Martin L. Cannington
Directors:
Jeffrey F. Cox, Chairman
Cuy Harrell, III
G. Ashley Register, M.D.
Donalsonville &
Colquitt, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Robert D. Vice
City President:
Tracy D. Pickle
Directors:
N. Ed King Jr., Chairman
D. Glenn Heard
Kenneth R. Massey
Dan E. Ponder Jr.
Danny S. Shepard
Directors Emeritus:
H. Wayne Carr
Joseph S. Hall
16 | AMERIS BANK
COMMUNITY BOARDS
OF DIRECTORS
Southeast Georgia Coast
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Michael D. Hodges
Directors:
Jimmy D. Veal, Chairman
Michael L. Davis
Stephen V. Kinney
G. Tony Sammons
Directors Emeritus:
C. Ray Acosta
John W. McDill
Thomas I. Stafford Jr.
J. Thomas Whelchel
State of South Carolina
Regional President:
H. Richard Sturm
Market President:
Mze Wilkins
Directors:
William H. Stern, Chairman
Kirkman Finlay, III
Edward G. McDonnell
William Weston J. Newton
Laurens C. Nicholson
A. Rae Phillips
St. Augustine, FL
Regional President:
Kendall L. Spencer
Market President:
Cecil F. Gibson, III
Directors:
Mark F. Bailey Sr.,
Chairman
David W. Alban
Jason P. Barrett
T. Brooks Burkhardt
J. Joseph Hatin
Director Emeritus:
Melvin A. McQuaig
Tallahassee, FL
Regional President:
Kendall L. Spencer
Market President:
Steven A. Lohbeck Jr.
Directors:
Halsey W. Beshears,
Chairman
Jeff Hartley
Ruben R. Rowe, III
Brent D. Sparkman
Thomasville, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Robert D. Vice
Directors:
L. Maurice Chastain,
Chairman
S. Mark Brewer, M.D.
Kenneth E. Hickey
Terrel M. Solana, Ph.D.
Tifton, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Joshua S. Bowen
Directors:
William I. Bowen Jr.,
Chairman
Austin L. Coarsey
Scott R. Fulp, D.D.S.
John Alan Lindsey
Wesley T. Paulk
Fortson B. Turner
Clifford A. Walker Sr.,
D.M.D.
Directors Emeritus:
J. Raymond Fulp
Loran A. Pate
Valdosta, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
Steven C. Reynolds
Directors:
Charles E. Smith,
Chairman
Bart T. Mizell
M. Alan Wheeler
Directors Emeritus:
Doyle Weltzbarker
Henry C. Wortman
Vidalia, GA
Regional President:
Michael T. Lee
Market President:
David B. Batchelor
City President:
Bobby S. Rigdon
Directors:
Christopher A. Hopkins,
Chairman
Pollyann F. Martin
Britton J. McDade
Jeffery S. McLain
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 17
18 | AMERIS BANK
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsThis Annual Report contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate” and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates which they were made. Ameris Bancorp undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Please refer to Ameris Bancorp’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a summary of important factors that may affect Ameris Bancorp’s forward-looking statements. ANNUAL REPORT 2019
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 19
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒
☐
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number
001-13901
AMERIS BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia
(State of incorporation)
58-1456434
(IRS Employer ID No.)
3490 Piedmont Road N.E., Suite 1550, Atlanta, Georgia 30305
(Address of principal executive offices)
(404) 639-6500
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $1 per share
ABCB
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller
reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☒
☐
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
☐
☐
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange
Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the
voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.82 billion.
As of February 29, 2020, the registrant had outstanding 69,336,749 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated into Part III hereof
by reference.
AMERIS BANCORP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
PART IV
Item 15.
Page
4
22
32
32
32
33
34
36
39
71
72
72
72
73
74
74
74
74
75
75
2
CAUTIONARY NOTE
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) and the documents incorporated by reference herein may contain
certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some
cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “should,”
“could,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “probable,” “potential,” “possible,” “target,”
“continue,” “look forward,” or “assume,” and words of similar import. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but
instead express only management’s beliefs regarding future results or events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and outside of management’s control. It is possible that actual results and events may differ, possibly materially, from
the anticipated results or events indicated in these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance, and we caution you not to place undue reliance on these statements.
You should understand that important factors, including the following, in addition to those described in Part I, Item 1A., “Risk
Factors,” and elsewhere in this Annual Report, as well as in the documents which are incorporated by reference into this Annual
Report, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the risks of any acquisitions, mergers or divestitures which we may undertake in the future, including, without
limitation, the related time and costs of implementing such transactions, integrating operations as part of these
transactions and possible failures to achieve expected gains, revenue growth, expense savings and/or other results from
such transactions;
the effects of future economic, business and market conditions and changes, including seasonality;
legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax laws, regulations and policies and
their application by our regulators;
changes in accounting rules, practices and interpretations;
the risks of changes in interest rates on the levels, composition and costs of deposits, loan demand, and the values and
liquidity of loan collateral, securities and interest-sensitive assets and liabilities;
changes in borrower credit risks and payment behaviors;
changes in the availability and cost of credit and capital in the financial markets;
changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of residential and commercial real estate;
the effects of concentrations in our loan portfolio;
our ability to resolve nonperforming assets;
the failure of assumptions and estimates underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses and other
estimates and valuations;
changes in technology or products that may be more difficult, costly or less effective than anticipated; and
the effects of war or other conflicts, acts of terrorism, hurricanes, floods, tornados or other catastrophic events that may
affect economic conditions.
Our management believes the forward-looking statements about us are reasonable. However, you should not place undue
reliance on them. Any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report and the documents incorporated by reference herein
are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results, developments
and business decisions may differ from those contemplated by those forward-looking statements, and such differences may be
material. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond our ability to control or predict. We disclaim any duty
to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section.
3
As used in this Annual Report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Ameris” and the “Company” refer to Ameris Bancorp and its
subsidiaries (unless the context indicates another meaning).
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
We are a financial holding company whose business is conducted primarily through our wholly owned banking subsidiary,
Ameris Bank (the “Bank”), which provides a full range of banking services to its retail and commercial customers who are
primarily concentrated in select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. Ameris was incorporated on
December 18, 1980 as a Georgia corporation. The Company’s executive office is located at 3490 Piedmont Road N.E., Suite
1550, Atlanta, Georgia 30305, our telephone number is (404) 639-6500 and our internet address is www.amerisbank.com. We
operate 170 full-service domestic banking offices. We do not operate in any foreign countries. At December 31, 2019, we had
approximately $18.24 billion in total assets, $14.48 billion in total loans, $14.03 billion in total deposits and $2.47 billion of
shareholders’ equity. Our deposits are insured, up to applicable limits, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
“FDIC”).
We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge on our website
at www.amerisbank.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC. These
reports are also available without charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Parent Company
Our primary business as a bank holding company is to manage the business and affairs of the Bank. As a bank holding
company, we perform certain shareholder and investor relations functions and seek to provide financial support, if necessary, to
the Bank.
Ameris Bank
Our principal subsidiary is the Bank, which is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia and operates branches primarily concentrated
in select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. These branches serve distinct communities in our business
areas with autonomy but do so as one bank, leveraging our favorable geographic footprint in an effort to acquire more
customers.
Capital Trust Securities
On September 20, 2006, the Company completed a private placement of an aggregate of $36,000,000 of trust preferred
securities. The placement occurred through a statutory trust subsidiary of Ameris, Ameris Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”). The
trust preferred securities carry a quarterly adjustable interest rate of 1.63% over the 3-Month LIBOR. The trust preferred
securities mature on December 15, 2036, and became redeemable at the Company’s option on September 15, 2011.
On December 16, 2005, Ameris acquired First National Banc, Inc. (“FNB”) by merger. In connection with such transaction,
Ameris assumed the obligations of FNB related to its prior issuance of trust preferred securities. In 2004, FNB’s statutory trust
subsidiary, First National Banc Statutory Trust I, issued $5,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per
annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 2.80% through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. These trust preferred
securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date.
On December 23, 2013, Ameris acquired The Prosperity Banking Company (“Prosperity”) by merger. In connection with such
transaction, Ameris assumed the obligations of Prosperity related to the following issuances of trust preferred securities: (i) in
2003, Prosperity’s statutory trust subsidiary, Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust II, issued $4,500,000 in principal amount of trust
preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 3.15%; (ii) in 2004, Prosperity’s statutory trust
subsidiary, Prosperity Banking Capital Trust I, issued $5,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per
annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 2.57%; (iii) in 2006, Prosperity’s statutory trust subsidiary, Prosperity Bank Statutory
Trust III, issued $10,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR
plus 1.60%; and (iv) in 2007, Prosperity’s statutory trust subsidiary, Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust IV, issued $10,000,000 in
principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.54%. Each of the
4
foregoing issuances was consummated through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. These trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date.
On June 30, 2014, Ameris acquired Coastal Bankshares, Inc. (“Coastal”) by merger. In connection with such transaction,
Ameris assumed the obligations of Coastal related to the following issuances of trust preferred securities: (i) in 2003, Coastal’s
statutory trust subsidiary, Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust I, issued $5,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred
securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 3.15%; and (ii) in 2005, Coastal’s statutory trust subsidiary,
Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust II, issued $10,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum
equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.60%. Each of the foregoing issuances was consummated through a pool sponsored by a
national brokerage firm. These trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s
option on any quarterly interest payment date.
On May 22, 2015, Ameris acquired Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated (“Merchants”) by merger. In
connection with such transaction, Ameris assumed the obligations of Merchants related to the following issuances of trust
preferred securities: (i) in 2005, Merchants’ statutory trust subsidiary, Merchants & Southern Statutory Trust I, issued
$3,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.90%; and
(ii) in 2006, Merchants’ statutory trust subsidiary, Merchants & Southern Statutory Trust II, issued $3,000,000 in principal
amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.50%. Each of the foregoing
issuances was consummated through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. These trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date.
On March 11, 2016, Ameris acquired Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. (“JAXB”) by merger. In connection with such transaction,
Ameris assumed the obligations of JAXB related to the following issuances of trust preferred securities: (i) in 2004, JAXB’s
statutory trust subsidiary, Jacksonville Statutory Trust I, issued $4,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a
rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 2.63%; (ii) in 2006, JAXB’s statutory trust subsidiary, Jacksonville Statutory
Trust II, issued $3,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR
plus 1.73%; (iii) in 2008, JAXB’s statutory trust subsidiary, Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. Statutory Trust III, issued $7,550,000 in
principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 3.75%; and (iv) in 2005,
JAXB’s statutory trust subsidiary, Atlantic BancGroup, Inc. Statutory Trust I, issued $3,000,000 in principal amount of trust
preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.50%. Each of foregoing issuances has a maturity of
30 years and is redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date.
Issuances by Jacksonville
Statutory Trust I, Jacksonville Statutory Trust II, and Atlantic BancGroup, Inc. Statutory Trust I were consummated through a
pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm, whereas the issuance by Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. Statutory Trust III was
consummated as a single issue.
On June 29, 2018, Ameris acquired Hamilton State Bancshares, Inc. (“Hamilton”) by merger. In connection with such
transaction, Ameris assumed the obligations of Hamilton related to an issuance of trust preferred securities that Hamilton has
assumed in its acquisition of Cherokee Banking Company on February 17, 2014. In 2005, Cherokee Banking Company's
statutory trust subsidiary, Cherokee Statutory Trust I, issued $3,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a
rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.50%. The foregoing issuance was consummated through a pool sponsored
by a national brokerage firm. These trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s
option on any quarterly interest payment date.
On July 1, 2019, Ameris acquired Fidelity Southern Corporation (“Fidelity”) by merger. In connection with such transaction,
Ameris assumed the obligations of Fidelity related to the following issuances of trust preferred securities: (i) in 2003, Fidelity’s
statutory trust subsidiary, Fidelity Southern Statutory Trust I, issued $15,464,000 in principal amount of trust preferred
securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 3.10%; (ii) in 2005, Fidelity’s statutory trust subsidiary,
Fidelity Southern Statutory Trust II, issued $10,310,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum
equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.89%; and (iii) in 2007, Fidelity’s statutory trust subsidiary, Fidelity Southern Statutory
Trust III, issued $20,619,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR
plus 1.40%. Each of foregoing issuances has a maturity of 30 years and is redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly
interest payment date.
See the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for a further discussion of these trust
preferred securities.
5
Strategy
We seek to increase our presence and grow the “Ameris” brand in the markets that we currently serve in Georgia, Alabama,
Florida and South Carolina and in neighboring communities that present attractive opportunities for expansion. Management
has pursued this objective through an acquisition-oriented growth strategy and a prudent operating strategy. Our community
banking philosophy emphasizes personalized service and building broad and deep customer relationships, which has provided
us with a substantial base of low cost core deposits. Our markets are managed by senior level, experienced decision makers in a
decentralized structure that differentiates us from our larger competitors. Management believes that this structure, along with
involvement in and knowledge of our local markets, will continue to provide growth and assist in managing risk throughout our
Company.
We have maintained our focus on a long-term strategy of expanding and diversifying our franchise in terms of revenues,
profitability and asset size. Our growth over the past several years has been enhanced significantly by bank acquisitions,
including Fidelity in 2019, Hamilton and Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation ("Atlantic") in 2018, JAXB in 2016, 18 retail
branches from Bank of America in 2015, Merchants in 2015, Coastal in 2014, Prosperity in 2013 and ten failed institutions in
FDIC-assisted transactions between 2009 and 2012. We expect to continue to take advantage of the consolidation in the
financial services industry and enhance our franchise through future acquisitions. We intend to grow within our existing
markets, to branch into or acquire financial institutions in existing markets as well as financial institutions in other markets
consistent with our capital availability and management abilities.
BANKING SERVICES
Lending Activities
General. The Company maintains a diversified loan portfolio by providing a broad range of commercial and retail lending
services to business entities and individuals. We provide agricultural loans, commercial business loans, commercial and
residential real estate construction and mortgage loans, consumer loans, revolving lines of credit and letters of credit. The
Company also originates first mortgage residential mortgage loans and generally enters into a commitment to sell these loans in
the secondary market. We have not made or participated in foreign, energy-related or subprime loans. In addition, the Company
does not regularly buy loan participations or portions of national credits but from time to time, may acquire balances subject to
participation agreements through acquisition. Less than 1% of the Company’s loan portfolio was loan participations purchased
at December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2019, our loan portfolio totaled approximately $14.48 billion, representing approximately 79.3% of our total
assets. For additional discussion of our loan portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations – Loans.”
Commercial Real Estate Loans. This portion of our loan portfolio has grown significantly over the past few years and
represents the largest segment of our loan portfolio. These loans are generally extended for acquisition, development or
construction of commercial properties. The loans are underwritten with an emphasis on the viability of the project, the
borrower’s ability to meet certain minimum debt service requirements and an analysis and review of the collateral and
guarantors, if any.
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans. Ameris originates adjustable and fixed-rate residential mortgage loans. These
mortgage loans are generally originated under terms and conditions consistent with secondary market guidelines. Some of these
loans will be placed in the Company’s loan portfolio; however, a majority are sold in the secondary market. The residential real
estate mortgage loans that are included in the Company’s loan portfolio are usually owner-occupied and generally amortized
over a 20- to 30-year period with three- to five-year maturity or repricing. In addition, during 2015 and 2016, the Company
purchased residential mortgage loan pools collateralized by properties located outside our Southeast markets, specifically in
California, Washington and Illinois. At December 31, 2019, purchased loan pools totaled approximately $213.2 million.
Agricultural Loans. Our agricultural loans are extended to finance crop production, the purchase of farm-related equipment or
farmland and the operations of dairies, poultry producers, livestock producers and timber growers. Agricultural loans typically
involve seasonal balance fluctuations. Although we typically look to an agricultural borrower’s cash flow as the principal
source of repayment, agricultural loans are also generally secured by a security interest in the crops or the farm-related
equipment and, in some cases, an assignment of crop insurance and mortgage on real estate. The lending officer visits the
borrower regularly during the growing season and re-evaluates the loan in light of the borrower’s updated cash flow
projections. A portion of our agricultural loans is guaranteed by the Farm Service Agency Guaranteed Loan Program.
6
loans consist of
Commercial and Industrial Loans. Generally, commercial and industrial
loans made primarily to
manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers of goods, service companies, municipalities and other industries. These loans are made
for acquisition, expansion and working capital purposes and may be secured by real estate, accounts receivable, inventory,
equipment, personal guarantees or other assets. The Company monitors these loans by requesting submission of corporate and
personal financial statements and income tax returns. The Company has also generated loans which are guaranteed by the U.S.
Small Business Administration (the “SBA”). SBA loans are generally underwritten in the same manner as conventional loans
generated for the Bank’s portfolio. Periodically, a portion of the loans that are secured by the guaranty of the SBA will be sold
in the secondary market. Management believes that making such loans helps the local community and also provides Ameris
with a source of income and solid future lending relationships as such businesses grow and prosper. The primary repayment risk
for commercial loans is the failure of the business due to economic or financial factors. During 2016, the Bank purchased a pool
of commercial insurance premium finance loans made to borrowers throughout the United States and began a division to
originate, administer and service these types of loans.
Consumer Loans. Our consumer loans include home improvement, home equity, motor vehicle, loans secured by savings
accounts and small unsecured personal credit lines. The terms of these loans typically range from 12 to 240 months and vary
based upon the nature of collateral and size of the loan. These loans are generally secured by various assets owned by the
consumer. In addition, during 2016, the Bank began purchasing consumer installment home improvement loans made to
borrowers throughout the United States.
Credit Administration
We have sought to maintain a comprehensive lending policy that meets the credit needs of each of the communities served by
the Bank, including low and moderate-income customers, and to employ lending procedures and policies consistent with this
approach. All loans are subject to our corporate loan policy, which is reviewed annually and updated as needed. The loan policy
provides that lending officers have sole authority to approve loans of various amounts commensurate with their seniority,
experience and needs within the market. Our local market presidents have discretion to approve loans in varying principal
amounts up to established limits, and our regional credit officers review and approve loans that exceed such limits.
Individual lending authority is assigned by the Company’s Chief Credit Officer, as is the maximum limit of new extensions of
credit that may be approved in each market. These approval limits are reviewed annually by the Company and adjusted as
needed. All requests for extensions of credit in excess of any of these limits are reviewed by one of nine regional credit officers.
When the request for approval exceeds the authority level of the regional credit officer, the approval of the Company’s Chief
Credit Officer and/or the Company’s loan committee is required. All new loans or modifications to existing loans in excess of
$500,000 are reviewed monthly by the Company’s Credit Administration Department with the lender responsible for the credit.
In addition, our ongoing loan review program subjects the portfolio to sampling and objective review by our ongoing internal
loan review process which is independent of the originating loan officer.
Each lending officer has authority to make loans only in the market area in which his or her Bank office is located and its
contiguous counties. Occasionally, our loan committee will approve making a loan outside of the market areas of the Bank,
provided the Bank has a prior relationship with the borrower. Our lending policy requires analysis of the borrower’s projected
cash flow and ability to service the debt.
The Bank has purchased loans outside of its market area. These include residential mortgage loan pools collateralized by
properties located outside our Southeast markets, specifically in California, Washington and Illinois, consumer installment
home improvement loans made to borrowers throughout the United States and commercial insurance premium finance loans
made to borrowers throughout the United States. These purchases were reviewed and approved by the Company's loan
committee.
We actively market our services to qualified lending customers in both the commercial and consumer sectors. Our commercial
lending officers actively solicit the business of new companies entering the market as well as longstanding members of that
market’s business community. Through personalized professional service and competitive pricing, we have been successful in
attracting new commercial lending customers. At the same time, we actively advertise our consumer loan products and
continually seek to make our lending officers more accessible.
The Bank continually monitors its loan portfolio to identify areas of concern and to enable management to take corrective
action when necessary. Local market presidents and lending officers meet periodically to review all past due loans, the status of
large loans and certain other credit or economic related matters. Individual lending officers are responsible for collection of past
due amounts and monitoring any changes in the financial status of the borrowers. Loans that are serviced by others, such as
7
certain residential mortgage loans and consumer installment home improvement loans, are monitored by the Company’s credit
officers, although ultimate collection of past due amounts is the responsibility of the servicing agents.
Investment Activities
Our investment policy is designed to maximize income from funds not needed to meet loan demand in a manner consistent with
appropriate liquidity and risk management objectives. Under this policy, our Company may invest in federal, state and
municipal obligations, corporate obligations, public housing authority bonds, industrial development revenue bonds, securities
issued by Government-Sponsored Enterprises (“GSEs”) and satisfactorily-rated trust preferred obligations. Investments in our
portfolio must satisfy certain quality criteria. Our Company’s investments must be “investment-grade” as determined by a
nationally recognized investment rating service. Investment securities where the Company has determined a certain level of
credit risk are periodically reviewed to determine the financial condition of the issuer and to support the Company’s decision to
continue holding the security. Our Company may purchase non-rated municipal bonds only if the issuer of such bonds is
located in the Company’s general market area and such bonds are determined by the Company to have a credit risk no greater
than the minimum ratings referred to above. Industrial development authority bonds, which normally are not rated, are
purchased only if the issuer is located in the Company’s market area and if the bonds are considered to possess a high degree of
credit soundness. Traditionally, the Company has purchased and held investment securities with very high levels of credit
quality, favoring investments backed by direct or indirect guarantees of the U.S. government.
While our investment policy permits our Company to trade securities to improve the quality of yields or marketability or to
realign the composition of the portfolio, the Bank historically has not done so to any significant extent.
Our investment committee implements the investment policy and portfolio strategies and monitors the portfolio. Reports on all
purchases, sales, net profits or losses and market appreciation or depreciation of the bond portfolio are reviewed by our Board
of Directors each quarter. The written investment policy is reviewed annually by the Company’s Board of Directors and
updated as needed.
The Company’s securities are held in safekeeping accounts at approved correspondent banks.
Deposits
The Company provides a full range of deposit accounts and services to both retail and commercial customers. These deposit
accounts have a variety of interest rates and terms and consist of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing accounts, including
commercial and retail checking accounts, regular interest-bearing savings accounts, money market accounts, individual
retirement accounts and certificates of deposit. Our Bank obtains most of its deposits from individuals and businesses in its
market areas.
Brokered deposits are deposits obtained by utilizing an outside broker that is paid a fee. The Bank utilizes brokered deposits to
accomplish several purposes, such as (i) acquiring a certain maturity and dollar amount without repricing the Bank’s current
customers which could increase or decrease the overall cost of deposits and (ii) acquiring certain maturities and dollar amounts
to help manage interest rate risk.
Other Funding Sources
The Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) allows the Company to obtain advances through its credit program. These advances
are secured by securities owned by the Company and held in safekeeping by the FHLB, FHLB stock owned by the Company
and certain qualifying loans secured by real estate, including residential mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and
commercial real estate loans. The Company maintains credit arrangements with various other financial institutions to purchase
federal funds. The Company participates in the Federal Reserve discount window borrowings program.
On December 6, 2019, the Company completed the public offering and sale of $120.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
its 4.25% Fixed-To-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2029. The subordinated notes were sold to the public at par. The
subordinated notes will mature on December 15, 2029 and through December 14, 2024 will bear a fixed rate of interest of
4.25% per annum. Beginning December 15, 2024, the interest rate on the subordinated notes resets quarterly to a floating rate
per annum equal to the then-current three-month SOFR plus 2.94%.
On March 13, 2017, the Company completed the public offering and sale of $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its
5.75% Fixed-To-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2027. The subordinated notes were sold to the public at par. The
subordinated notes will mature on March 15, 2027 and through March 14, 2022 will bear a fixed rate of interest of 5.75% per
8
annum. Beginning March 15, 2022, the interest rate on the subordinated notes resets quarterly to a floating rate per annum equal
to the then-current three-month LIBOR plus 3.616%.
The Company has long-term subordinated deferrable interest debentures with a net book carrying value of $127.6 million as of
December 31, 2019. The majority of these trust preferred securities were assumed as liabilities in previous whole bank
acquisitions.
The Company also enters into repurchase agreements. These repurchase agreements are treated as short-term borrowings and
are reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as such.
Use of Derivatives
The Company seeks to provide stable net interest income despite changes in interest rates. In its review of interest rate risk, the
Company considers the use of derivatives to protect interest income on loans or to create a structure in institutional borrowings
that limits the Company’s cost. During 2018 and 2019, the Company had an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $37.1
million for the purpose of converting from a variable to a fixed interest rate on certain junior subordinated debentures on the
Company’s balance sheet. The interest rate swap, which is classified as a cash flow hedge, is indexed to 90-day LIBOR.
The Company maintains a risk management program to manage interest rate risk and pricing risk associated with its mortgage
lending activities. This program includes the use of forward contracts and other derivatives that are used to offset changes in the
value of the mortgage inventory due to changes in market interest rates. As a normal part of its operations, the Company enters
into derivative contracts such as forward sale commitments and interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) to economically
hedge risks associated with overall price risk related to IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value. The fair
value of these instruments amounted to an asset of approximately $7.8 million and $2.5 million at December 31, 2019 and
2018, respectively, and a derivative liability of approximately $4.5 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING AND BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Fidelity Southern Corporation
On July 1, 2019, the Company completed its acquisition of Fidelity, a bank holding company headquartered in Atlanta,
Georgia. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Fidelity was merged with and into the Company, with Ameris as the surviving
entity in the merger, and Fidelity's wholly owned banking subsidiary, Fidelity Bank, was merged with and into the Bank, with
the Bank surviving. The acquisition expanded the Company's existing market presence in Georgia and Florida, as Fidelity Bank
had a total of 62 branches at the time of closing, 46 of which were located in Georgia and 16 of which were located in Florida.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Fidelity's shareholders received 0.80 shares of Ameris common stock for each share
of Fidelity common stock they previously held. As a result, the Company issued 22,181,522 shares of its common stock at a fair
value of $869.3 million to Fidelity's shareholders as merger consideration.
Hamilton State Bancshares, Inc.
On June 29, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Hamilton. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Hamilton was
merged with and into the Company, with Ameris as the surviving entity in the merger and Hamilton's wholly owned banking
subsidiary, Hamilton State Bank, was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. The acquisition expanded the
Company's existing market presence, as Hamilton State Bank had a total of 28 full-service branches located in Atlanta, Georgia
and the surrounding area as well as in Gainesville, Georgia. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Hamilton's shareholders
received 0.16 shares of Ameris common stock and $0.93 in cash for each share of Hamilton voting common stock or nonvoting
common stock they previously held. As a result, the Company issued 6,548,385 common shares at a fair value of $349.4
million and paid $47.8 million in cash to Hamilton's shareholders as merger consideration, resulting in an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $397.1 million.
9
Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation
On May 25, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Atlantic. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Atlantic was
merged with and into the Company, with Ameris as the surviving entity in the merger and Atlantic's wholly owned banking
subsidiary, Atlantic Coast Bank, was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. The acquisition expanded the
Company's existing market presence, as Atlantic Coast Bank had a total of 12 full-service branches located in Jacksonville and
Jacksonville Beach, Duval County, Florida, Waycross, Georgia and Douglas, Georgia. Under the terms of the merger
agreement, Atlantic's shareholders received 0.17 shares of Ameris common stock and $1.39 in cash for each share of Atlantic
common stock they previously held. As a result, the Company issued 2,631,520 shares of Common Stock with a value of
approximately $147.8 million and paid $21.5 million in cash to Atlantic's shareholders as merger consideration, resulting in an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $169.3 million.
US Premium Finance Holding Company
On January 31, 2018, the Company closed on the purchase of the final 70% of the outstanding shares of common stock of US
Premium Finance Holding Company ("USPF"), completing its acquisition of USPF and making USPF a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company. Through a series of three acquisition transactions that closed on January 18, 2017, January 3, 2018
and January 31, 2018, the Company issued a total of 1,073,158 shares of its common stock at a fair value of $55.9 million and
paid $21.4 million in cash to the shareholders of USPF. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement dated January
25, 2018 under which Company purchased the final 70% of the outstanding shares of common stock of USPF, the selling
shareholders of USPF could receive additional cash payments aggregating up to $5.8 million based on the achievement by the
Company's premium finance division of certain income targets, between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. As of the January
31, 2018 acquisition date, the present value of the contingent earn-out consideration expected to be paid was $5.7 million. The
total contingent consideration paid was $1.2 million based on results achieved through the applicable measurement dates.
Including the fair value of the Company's common stock issued, cash paid and the present value of the contingent earn-out
consideration expected to be paid, the aggregate purchase price of USPF amounted to $83.0 million.
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.
On March 11, 2016, Ameris acquired JAXB by merger, at which time JAXB’s wholly owned banking subsidiary, The
Jacksonville Bank (“Jacksonville Bank”), was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. JAXB was
headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida and it operated eight full-service branches located in Jacksonville and Jacksonville
Beach, Duval County, Florida. The acquisition expanded the Company’s existing market presence in the Jacksonville market.
The consideration for the acquisition was a combination of cash and our Common Stock, with an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $96.4 million. The total consideration consisted of $23.9 million in cash and 2,549,469 shares of Common
Stock with a value of approximately $72.5 million.
Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Inc.
On May 22, 2015, Ameris acquired Merchants by merger, at which time Merchants’ wholly owned banking subsidiary,
Merchants and Southern Bank, was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. Merchants was headquartered in
Gainesville, Florida and operated 13 banking locations in Alachua, Marion and Clay Counties in Florida. The acquisition of
Merchants was significant to the Company’s growth strategy, as it expanded our existing footprint in several attractive Florida
markets. Ameris paid an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million to acquire the stock of Merchants.
Acquisition of 18 Branches in North Florida and South Georgia
On June 12, 2015, Ameris completed the acquisition of 18 branches from Bank of America, National Association located in
Calhoun, Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Suwanee and Walton Counties, Florida and Ben Hill, Colquitt, Dougherty, Laurens,
Liberty, Thomas, Tift and Ware Counties, Georgia. Ameris acquired approximately $644.7 million in deposits and paid a
deposit premium of $20.0 million, equal to 3.00% of the average daily deposits for the 15 calendar-day period immediately
prior to the acquisition date. In addition, Ameris acquired approximately $4.0 million in loans and $10.7 million in premises
and equipment.
10
MARKET AREAS AND COMPETITION
The banking industry in general, and in the southeastern United States specifically, is highly competitive and dramatic changes
continue to occur throughout the industry. While our select market areas in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina have
experienced strong population growth over the past 20 to 30 years, intense market demands, national and local economic
pressures, including a low interest rate environment, and increased customer awareness of product and service differences
among financial institutions have forced banks to diversify their services and become much more cost effective. Over the past
few years, our Bank has faced strong competition in attracting deposits at profitable levels. Competition for deposits comes
from other commercial banks, thrift institutions, savings banks, internet banks, credit unions, and brokerage and investment
banking firms. Interest rates, online banking capabilities, convenience of office locations and marketing are all significant
factors in our Bank’s competition for deposits.
Competition for loans comes from other commercial banks, thrift institutions, savings banks, insurance companies, consumer
finance companies, credit unions, mortgage companies, leasing companies and other institutional lenders. In order to remain
competitive, our Bank has varied interest rates and loan fees to some degree as well as increased the number and complexity of
services provided. We have not varied or altered our underwriting standards in any material respect in response to competitor
willingness to do so and in some markets have not been able to experience the growth in loans that we would have
preferred. Competition is affected by the general availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current
interest rate levels and other factors that are not readily predictable.
Competition among providers of financial products and services continues to increase with consumers having the opportunity to
select from a growing variety of traditional and nontraditional alternatives. The industry continues to consolidate, which affects
competition by eliminating some regional and local institutions, while strengthening the franchise of acquirers. Management
expects that competition will become more intense in the future due to changes in state and federal laws and regulations and the
entry of additional bank and nonbank competitors. See “Supervision and Regulation” under this Item.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2019, the Company employed approximately 2,722 full-time-equivalent employees. We consider our
relationship with our employees to be good.
We have adopted the Ameris Bancorp 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, as a retirement plan for our employees. This plan provides
deferral of compensation by our employees and contributions by Ameris. We also maintain a comprehensive employee benefits
program providing, among other benefits, hospitalization and major medical insurance and life insurance. Management
considers these benefits to be competitive with those offered by other financial institutions in our market areas. Our employees
are not represented by any collective bargaining group.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company makes loans to our directors and their affiliates and to banking officers. These loans are made on substantially
the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions and do not involve more than normal credit risk. At
December 31, 2019, we had approximately $14.48 billion in total loans outstanding, of which approximately $33.7 million were
outstanding to certain directors and their affiliates.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
We are extensively regulated under federal and state law. Generally, these laws and regulations are intended to protect
depositors and not shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of certain provisions of certain laws that affect the regulation of
bank holding companies and banks. The discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable laws and
regulations. Changes in such laws and regulations may have a material effect on our business and prospects.
Federal Bank Holding Company Regulation and Structure
As a bank holding company, we are subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act and to the supervision,
examination and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Our
Bank has a Georgia state charter and is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the Georgia
Department of Banking and Finance (the “GDBF”).
11
The Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve
before:
•
•
•
it may acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if, after the acquisition, the bank
holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of the bank;
it or any of its subsidiaries, other than a bank, may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank; or
it may merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company.
The Bank Holding Company Act further provides that the Federal Reserve may not approve any transaction that would result in
a monopoly or that would substantially lessen competition in the banking business, unless the public interest in meeting the
needs of the communities to be served outweighs the anti-competitive effects. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider
the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding companies and banks involved and the
convenience and needs of the communities to be served. Consideration of financial resources generally focuses on capital
in part, on performance under the Community
adequacy, and consideration of convenience and needs issues focuses,
Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), both of which are discussed elsewhere in more detail.
Subject to various exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and its implementing regulations, require Federal Reserve
approval prior to any company acquiring “control” of a bank holding company. Control for this purpose includes either the
acquisition of 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company, the power to elect a majority of the
directors of a bank holding company, or any arrangement in which the acquirer may direct the management or policies of a
bank holding company. The Change in Bank Control Act requires a person or company that acquires control of a bank holding
company to notify the Federal Reserve 60 days in advance of the acquisition. Control for this purpose is presumed to exist,
although such presumption is rebuttable, if a person or company acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of
voting securities and either:
•
•
the bank holding company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act; or
no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction.
Our Common Stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging
rebuttable presumptions of control.
The Bank Holding Company Act generally prohibits a bank holding company from engaging in activities other than banking,
managing or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries and acquiring or retaining direct or indirect control of any
company engaged in any activities other than activities closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks. In
determining whether a particular activity is permissible, the Federal Reserve considers whether performing the activity can be
expected to produce benefits to the public that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources,
decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices. The Federal Reserve has the power to order
a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or control of any subsidiary when the continuation of the
activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank
holding company.
Under the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding company may file an election with the Federal Reserve to be treated as
a financial holding company and thereby engage in an expanded list of financial activities. The election must be accompanied
by a certification that all of the company’s insured depository institution subsidiaries are “well capitalized” and “well
managed.” Additionally, the CRA rating of each subsidiary bank must be satisfactory or better. Effective August 24, 2000,
pursuant to a previously-filed election with the Federal Reserve, Ameris became a financial holding company. As such, we may
engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activities, including insurance
underwriting, securities underwriting and dealing, and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial
companies. If the Bank ceases to be “well capitalized” or “well managed” under applicable regulatory standards, the Federal
Reserve may, among other things, place limitations on our ability to conduct these broader financial activities. In addition, if the
Bank receives a rating of less than satisfactory under the CRA, we would be prohibited from engaging in any additional
activities other than those permissible for bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies. If, after becoming a
financial holding company and undertaking activities not permissible for a bank holding company, a company fails to continue
to meet any of the prerequisites for financial holding company status, including those described above, the company must enter
into an agreement with the Federal Reserve to comply with all applicable capital and management requirements. If the company
does not return to compliance within 180 days, the Federal Reserve may order the company to divest its subsidiary banks or the
12
company may discontinue or divest investments in companies engaged in activities permissible only for a bank holding
company that has elected to be treated as a financial holding company.
By statute and regulation, we are expected to act as a source of financial strength for the Bank and to commit resources to
support the Bank. This support may be required at times when, without this Federal Reserve policy, we might not be inclined to
provide it. In addition, any capital loans made by us to the Bank will be repaid only after its deposits and various other
obligations are repaid in full.
Our Bank is also subject to numerous state and federal statutes and regulations that affect its business, activities and operations
and is supervised and examined by state and federal bank regulatory agencies. The FDIC and the GDBF regularly examine the
operations of our Bank and are given the authority to approve or disapprove mergers, consolidations, the establishment of
branches and similar corporate actions. These agencies also have the power to prevent the continuance or development of
unsafe or unsound banking practices or other violations of law.
Changes to our Regulation and Supervision in Crossing $10 Billion in Assets Threshold
Federal
law imposes heightened requirements on banks and bank holding companies that exceed $10 billion in total
consolidated assets. The Company and the Bank exceeded $10 billion in total consolidated assets upon completion of our
acquisition of Hamilton in June 2018. As a result, we are now subject to certain additional requirements, which include the
following:
•
•
•
The calculation of the Bank’s FDIC deposit insurance assessment base has been changed and utilizes the performance
score and a loss-severity score system as summarized under “FDIC Insurance Assessments.”
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) replaces the FDIC as our supervisor with respect to consumer
protection laws and regulations and conducts examinations of our compliance with these laws and regulations.
Under the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank
Act”) and the Federal Reserve’s implementing regulations, the debit card interchange fee that the Bank charges
merchants must be reasonable and proportional to the cost of clearing the transaction. The maximum permissible
interchange fee is capped at the sum of $0.21 plus five basis points of the transaction value for many types of debit
interchange transactions. The Bank may also recover $0.01 per transaction for fraud prevention purposes if it complies
with certain fraud-related requirements. The Federal Reserve also has rules governing routing and exclusivity that
require debit card issuers to offer two unaffiliated networks for routing transactions on each debit or prepaid product.
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act required publicly traded bank holding companies with assets of $10 billion or more to perform
capital stress testing and establish a risk committee responsible for enterprise-wide risk management practices. Banks with
more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets also have been required to conduct annual stress tests. However, these
requirements no longer apply to bank holding companies and banks with less than $100 billion in total consolidated assets
following the enactment of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the “EGRRCPA”) and the
finalization of implementing regulations. The Federal Reserve will continue to assess the substance of our risk management
practices in its examinations.
Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions
Ameris is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. While there are various legal and regulatory limitations under
federal and state law on the extent to which our Bank can pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Ameris, the principal
source of our cash revenues is dividends from our Bank. The prior approval of applicable regulatory authorities is required if
the total amount of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year exceeds 50% of the Bank’s net profits for the
previous year. The relevant federal and state regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit a state member bank or bank
holding company, which would include Ameris and the Bank, from engaging in what, in the opinion of such regulatory body,
constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business. The payment of dividends could, depending upon the
financial condition of the subsidiary, be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business.
Under Georgia law, the prior approval of the GDBF is required before any cash dividends may be paid by a state bank if:
(i) total classified assets at the most recent examination of such bank exceed 80% of the equity capital (as defined, which
includes the reserve for loan losses) of such bank; (ii) the aggregate amount of dividends declared or anticipated to be declared
in the calendar year exceeds 50% of the net profits (as defined) for the previous calendar year; or (iii) the ratio of equity capital
13
to adjusted total assets is less than 6%. As of December 31, 2019, there was approximately $93.1 million of retained earnings of
our Bank available for payment of cash dividends under applicable regulations without obtaining regulatory approval.
In addition, our Bank is subject to limitations under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act with respect to extensions of credit
to, investments in and certain other transactions with Ameris. Furthermore, loans and extensions of credit are also subject to
various collateral requirements.
The Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which
expresses the Federal Reserve’s view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the holding
company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earning retention that is
consistent with the holding company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve also has
indicated that it would be inappropriate for a holding company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay
dividends. Furthermore, under the prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve
may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if one or more of the holding company’s bank subsidiaries is
classified as undercapitalized.
A bank holding company is required to give the Federal Reserve prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its
outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net
consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of its
consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal
would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve order or condition
imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve.
Capital Adequacy
We must comply with the Federal Reserve’s established capital adequacy standards, and our Bank is required to comply with
the capital adequacy standards established by the FDIC. The Federal Reserve has promulgated two types of measures of capital
adequacy for bank holding companies: risk-based measures and a leverage measure. A bank holding company must satisfy all
applicable capital standards to be considered in compliance.
The risk-based capital standards are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk
profile, primarily credit risk profile, among banks and bank holding companies, account for off-balance-sheet exposures and
minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets.
Assets and off-balance-sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights. The resulting capital
ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance-sheet items. The risk-based approach three
measures of capital against risk-weighted assets: Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital.
The leverage measurement is the ratio of Tier 1 Capital to Average Total Consolidated Assets without any risk-weighting.
The regulatory capital framework under which we operate has changed over the past several years, in part as a result of the
Dodd-Frank Act. This statute subjected bank holding companies to the same capital requirements as their bank subsidiaries and
eliminated or significantly reduced the use of hybrid capital instruments, especially trust preferred securities, as regulatory
capital.
Apart from the Dodd-Frank Act, in July 2013, the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved
a final rule that implemented a series of previously proposed rules to conform U.S. regulatory capital rules with the
international regulatory standards agreed to by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in the accord referred to as “Basel
III” and to implement requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Later in 2013, the FDIC imposed the same requirements in the form
of an interim final rule. The regulations established new higher capital ratio requirements, enhanced the requirements for certain
instruments to qualify as capital, imposed new operating restrictions on banking organizations with insufficient capital buffers
and increased the risk weights of certain assets. The regulatory changes found in the new final rule include the following:
14
•
•
The final rule established a new capital measure called Common Equity Tier 1 Capital consisting of common stock
and related surplus, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and, subject to certain adjustments,
minority common equity interests in subsidiaries. Unlike prior rules which excluded unrealized gains and losses on
the final rule generally requires accumulated other
available for sale debt securities from regulatory capital,
comprehensive income to flow through to regulatory capital; however, pursuant to a one-time, permanent election
made available to most FDIC-supervised institutions, the Bank elected to opt out of the requirement to include most
components of accumulated other comprehensive income in its regulatory capital. Depository institutions and their
holding companies are now required to maintain Common Equity Tier 1 Capital equal to 4.5% of risk-weighted assets.
Additionally, the regulations increased the required ratio of Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets from 4% to 6%. Tier
1 Capital consists of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital plus Additional Tier 1 Capital which includes non-cumulative
perpetual preferred stock. Neither cumulative preferred stock (other than certain preferred stock issued to the U.S.
Treasury) nor trust preferred securities qualify as Additional Tier 1 Capital, but they may be included in Tier 2 Capital
along with qualifying subordinated debt. The new regulations also require a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for
all institutions, while the minimum required ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets remains at 8%.
In addition to increased capital requirements, depository institutions and their holding companies are now required to
maintain a capital conservation buffer of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital over and above the minimum risk-based
capital requirements in order to avoid limitations on the payment of dividends, the repurchase of shares or the payment
of discretionary bonuses. A banking organization will be prohibited from making distributions or discretionary bonus
payments during any quarter if its eligible retained income is negative in that quarter and its capital conservation buffer
was less that the required level at the beginning of the quarter. As of January 1, 2019, the buffer requirement is 2.5%.
Taking into account the buffer requirement, the Basel III risk-based capital requirements are as follows 10.50% Total
Risk-Based Capital Ratio, 8.50% Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio and 7% Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital
Ratio. The buffer requirement does not apply to the leverage ratio requirement, which remains at 4%.
Since 2001, our consolidated capital ratios have increased due to the issuance and assumption of trust preferred securities. At
December 31, 2019, all of our trust preferred securities were included in Tier 2 Capital. At December 31, 2019, our total risk-
based capital ratio, our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and our common equity Tier 1 capital ratio were 12.94%, 9.93% and
9.93%, respectively. The same ratios at the Bank were 12.18%, 11.39% and 11.39%, respectively. Neither Ameris nor the Bank
has been advised by any federal banking agency of any additional specific minimum capital ratio requirement applicable to it.
At December 31, 2019, our leverage ratio was 8.48%, compared with 9.17% at December 31, 2018. Federal Reserve guidelines
provide that bank holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong
capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without significant reliance on intangible assets. The
Federal Reserve has indicated that it will consider a “tangible Tier 1 Capital leverage ratio” and other indications of capital
strength in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities. The Federal Reserve has not advised Ameris of any additional
specific minimum leverage ratio or tangible Tier 1 Capital leverage ratio applicable to it. The Bank's leverage ratio was 9.73%
at December 31, 2019.
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital
directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and certain other restrictions on its business. As described below,
the FDIC can impose substantial additional restrictions upon FDIC-insured depository institutions that fail to meet applicable
capital requirements.
The Bank also must maintain capital under a framework knows as “prompt corrective action.” The Federal Deposit Insurance
Act (or “FDI Act”) requires the primary federal regulator of an insured depository institution to take prompt corrective action if
the institution does not meet minimum capital requirements. The FDI Act establishes five capital tiers: “well capitalized,”
“adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” A depository
institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various relevant capital measures and certain other
factors, as established by regulation.
The federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted regulations establishing relevant capital measurers and relevant capital
levels applicable to FDIC-insured banks. The relevant capital measures are the Total Capital ratio, Tier 1 Capital ratio,
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio and leverage ratio. Under the regulations, an FDIC-insured bank will be:
•
“well capitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Common
Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of 6.5% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater and is not subject to any order or
written directive by the appropriate regulatory authority to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital
measure;
15
•
•
•
•
“adequately capitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 6% or greater, a
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of 4.5% or greater and a leverage ratio of 4% or greater (3% in certain
circumstances) and is not “well capitalized;”
“undercapitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of less than 8%, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 6%, a Common
Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 4.5% or a leverage ratio of less than 4%;
“significantly undercapitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 4%, a
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 3% or a leverage ratio of less than 3%; and
“critically undercapitalized” if its tangible equity is equal to or less than 2% of average quarterly tangible assets.
An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than is indicated by its capital ratios if
it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to
certain matters. As of December 31, 2019, our Bank had capital levels that qualify as “well capitalized” under such regulations.
The FDI Act generally prohibits an FDIC-insured bank from making a capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or
paying any management fee to its holding company if the bank would thereafter be “undercapitalized.” “Undercapitalized”
banks are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. The federal regulators may not
accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to
succeed in restoring the bank’s capital. In addition, for a capital restoration plan to be acceptable, the bank’s parent holding
company must guarantee that the institution will comply with such capital restoration plan. The aggregate liability of the parent
holding company is limited to the lesser of: (i) an amount equal to 5% of the bank’s total assets at the time it became
“undercapitalized”; and (ii) the amount which is necessary (or would have been necessary) to bring the institution into
compliance with all capital standards applicable with respect to such institution as of the time it fails to comply with the plan. If
a bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.”
“Significantly undercapitalized” insured banks may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to
sell sufficient voting stock to become “adequately capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets and the cessation of receipt
of deposits from correspondent banks. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or
conservator.
A bank that is not “well capitalized” may not accept brokered deposits although an adequately capitalized institution may
request a waiver from the FDIC in order to do so. Well capitalized status is necessary to qualify for certain regulatory benefits,
such as expedited processing of applications.
Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders; Tying Arrangements
The Bank is subject to certain restrictions in its dealings with us and our affiliates. Transactions between banks and any affiliate
are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank typically is any company or entity
that controls or is under common control with the bank. Some but not all subsidiaries of a bank may be exempt from the
definition of an affiliate.
In a holding company context, the parent holding company of a bank and any companies that are
controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B (i) limit the extent to
which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of
such institution’s capital stock and surplus, and limit the aggregate of all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal
to 20% of such capital stock and surplus and (ii) require that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least
as favorable, to the institution or subsidiary as those that would be provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction”
includes the making of loans to an affiliate, purchase of assets from an affiliate, issuance of a guarantee on behalf of an affiliate
and several other types of transactions. Extensions of credit to an affiliate usually must be over-collateralized.
Restrictions also apply to extensions of credit by a bank to its executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their
related interests and to similar individuals at the holding company or affiliates. In general, such extensions of credit (i) may not
exceed certain dollar limitations, (ii) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as
those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties, and (iii) must not involve more than the normal risk
of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Certain extensions of credit also require the approval of the bank’s board of
directors.
A bank may not extend credit, lease or sell property or furnish any service or fix or vary the consideration for them on the
condition that (i) the customer obtain or provide some additional credit, property or service from or to the bank or its holding
16
company or their subsidiaries (other than a loan, discount, deposit or trust service or that are related to and usually provided in
connection with any such product or service) or (ii) the customer not obtain some other credit, property or services from a
competitor, except to the extent reasonable conditions are imposed to assure the soundness of the credit extended. The federal
banking agencies have, however, allowed banks to offer combined-balance products and otherwise to offer more favorable
terms if a customer obtains two or more traditional bank products. The law authorizes the Federal Reserve to grant additional
exceptions by regulation or order.
Reserves
Pursuant to regulations of the Federal Reserve, a savings association must maintain reserves against its transaction accounts.
During 2019, no reserves were required to be maintained on the first $16.3 million of transaction accounts, reserves of 3% were
required to be maintained against the next $107.9 million of transaction accounts and a reserve of 10% was required to be
maintained against all remaining transaction accounts. These percentages are subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve and
have been increased for 2020. Because required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash or in a noninterest
bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, the effect of the reserve requirement may reduce the amount of an institution’s
interest-earning assets.
FDIC Insurance Assessments
The Bank’s deposits are insured to the maximum extent permitted by the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”). As insurer, the
FDIC is authorized to conduct examinations of, and to require reporting by, insured institutions. It also may prohibit any
insured institution from engaging in any activity determined by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the FDIC. Deposit
insurance is capped at $250,000 for each account (subject to certain restrictions) of a depositor at an insured depository
institution.
The FDIC manages the DIF in part through the DIF’s reserve ratio and sets assessment rates to achieve a “designated reserve
ratio” (the “DRR”), the ratio at which the FDIC believes the DIF can withstand a future banking crisis. The FDIC has set the
DRR at 2.0% as a long-range minimum target. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the reserve ratio of the DIF to reach 1.35% by
September 30, 2020. The DIF achieved this target as of September 30, 2018, when the reserve ratio reached 1.36%. The FDIC
has adopted a risk-based premium system that provides for quarterly assessments. In addition, all institutions with deposits
insured by the FDIC have been required to pay assessments to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing
Corporation, a mixed-ownership government corporation established to recapitalize the predecessor to the DIF. These
assessments ended in 2019 when these bonds matured.
Through June 30, 2016, the Bank’s assessment rate was based on a methodology adopted by the FDIC for the quarter beginning
April 1, 2011. This methodology was in response to a provision in the Dodd-Frank Act that changed the calculation of the
assessment base and that entailed changes to the risk-based pricing system. Under the methodology adopted for 2011, the
assessment base became an insured depository institution’s average consolidated total assets less average tangible equity. The
overall range of initial base assessment rates was five basis points to 45 basis points. Institutions (including, at that time, the
Bank) that were not large and highly complex institutions were placed in one of four risk categories depending on the
institution’s capital level (using the same thresholds as in the prompt corrective action regime) and supervisory evaluations by
the institution’s primary federal regulator. The risk category with the highest-rated and well-capitalized institutions included a
range of assessment rates, and a specific rate was assigned to a particular institution based on a variety of financial factors and
the institution’s component CAMELS ratings. Each of the remaining three risk categories imposed the same rate on all
institutions in the category.
In April 2016, the FDIC adopted new assessment rates and a new methodology for the assignment of rates that would become
effective when the reserve ratio of the DIF rose above 1.15%. This event occurred when the FDIC announced that as of June
30, 2016, the reserve ratio was 1.17%. The range of initial base assessment rates shifted down to three basis points to 30 basis
points (subject to certain adjustments for unsecured debt and brokered deposits). Insured depository institutions other than large
and highly complex institutions were assigned to one of three (rather than four) risk categories based solely on composite
CAMELS rating. Each of the three risk categories has a range of rates, and the rate for a particular institution is determined
based on seven financial ratios and the weighted average of its component CAMELS ratings. Under the new assessment rule,
further downward adjustments of assessment rates are possible as the DRR exceeds 2.0% and higher levels.
The Bank’s adjusted average consolidated total assets exceeded $10 billion for four consecutive quarters with the first quarter
of 2019. As a result, the Bank’s deposit insurance assessment was thereafter based on a large institution classification, rather
than the small institution classification that had applied in prior years. For large insured depository institutions, generally
defined as those with at least $10 billion in total assets, the FDIC has eliminated risk categories when calculating the initial base
17
assessment rates and now combines CAMELS ratings and financial measures into two scorecards to calculate assessment rates,
one for most large insured depository institutions and another for highly complex insured depository institutions (which are
generally those with more than $50 billion in total assets that are controlled by a parent company with more than $500 billion in
total assets). Each scorecard has two components - a performance score and loss severity score, which are combined and
converted to an initial assessment rate. The FDIC has the ability to adjust a large or highly complex insured depository
institution’s total score by a maximum of 15 points, up or down, based upon significant risk factors that are not captured by the
scorecard. Under the current assessment rate schedule, the initial base assessment rate for large and highly complex insured
depository institutions ranges from three to 30 basis points, and the total base assessment rate, after applying the unsecured debt
and brokered deposit adjustments, ranges from one and one-half to 40 basis points.
Future changes in insurance premiums could have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations, and we
cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution, including the Bank, if the FDIC
determines after a hearing that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or
unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed by an
agreement with the FDIC. The FDIC also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the
permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. Management is not aware of any existing
circumstances that would result in termination of our deposit insurance.
Acquisitions
As an active acquirer, we must comply with numerous laws related to our acquisition activity. Under the Bank Holding
Company Act, a bank holding company may not directly or indirectly acquire ownership or control of more than 5% of the
voting shares or substantially all of the assets of any bank or merge or consolidate with another bank holding company without
the prior approval of the Federal Reserve. Current federal law authorizes interstate acquisitions of banks and bank holding
companies without geographic limitation. Furthermore, a bank headquartered in one state is authorized to merge with a bank
headquartered in another state, as long as neither of the states has opted out of such interstate merger authority prior to such
date, and subject to any state requirement that the target bank shall have been in existence and operating for a minimum period
of time, not to exceed five years, and to certain deposit market-share limitations. After a bank has established branches in a state
through an interstate merger transaction, the bank may establish and acquire additional branches at any location in the state
where a bank headquartered in that state could have established or acquired branches under applicable federal or state law.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) requires federal bank regulatory agencies to encourage financial institutions to
meet the credit needs of low and moderate-income borrowers in their local communities. The agencies periodically examine the
CRA performance of each of the institutions for which they are the primary federal regulator and assign one of four ratings:
Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve, or Substantial Noncompliance. An institution’s size and business strategy
determine the type of examination that it will receive. The FDIC evaluates the Bank as a large, retail-oriented institution and
In order to take advantage of certain regulatory benefits, such
applies performance-based lending, investment and service tests.
as expedited processing of applications, an insured depository institution must maintain a rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory.
In its most recent CRA evaluation, as of October 3, 2016, the Bank was rated Satisfactory.
The CRA regulations impose certain disclosure obligations. Each institution must post a notice advising the public of its right to
comment to the institution and its regulator on the institution’s CRA performance and to review the institution’s CRA public
file. Each lending institution must maintain for public inspection a file that includes a listing of branch locations and services, a
summary of lending activity, a map of its communities and any written comments from the public on its performance in
meeting community credit needs. The CRA requires public disclosure of an insured depository institution’s written CRA
evaluations.
Consumer Protection Laws
The Bank is subject to a number of federal and state laws designed to protect customers and promote lending to various sectors
of the economy and population. These consumer protection laws apply to a broad range of our activities and to various aspects
of our business and include laws relating to interest rates, fair lending, disclosures of credit terms and estimated transaction
costs to consumer borrowers, debt collection practices, the use of and the provision of information to consumer reporting
agencies, and the prohibition of unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with the offer, sale or provision of
consumer financial products and services. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act,
18
the Truth in Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act and state law counterparts.
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB, which has been given the power to promulgate and enforce federal
consumer protection laws. All insured depository institutions are subject to the CFPB’s rulemaking authority, and the CFPB has
sole authority to examine insured depository institutions with more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets (and its
affiliates) for compliance with these laws and regulations. The CFPB became our exclusive supervisor in these areas starting in
the second quarter of 2019. The focus of the CFPB is on the following: (i) risks to consumers and compliance with the federal
consumer financial laws; (ii) the markets in which firms operate and risks to consumers posed by activities in those markets;
(iii) depository institutions that offer a wide variety of consumer financial products and services; (iv) depository institutions
with a more specialized focus; and (v) non-depository companies that offer one or more consumer financial products or
services.
The CFPB has promulgated many mortgage-related final rules, including rules related to the ability to repay and qualified
mortgage standards, mortgage servicing standards, loan originator compensation standards, high-cost mortgage requirements,
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requirements and appraisal and escrow standards for higher priced mortgages. The mortgage-
related final rules issued by the CFPB have materially restructured the origination, servicing and securitization of residential
mortgages in the United States. For example, under the CFPB’s Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage rule, before making a
mortgage loan, a lender must establish that a borrower has the ability to repay the mortgage. “Qualified mortgages,” as defined
in the rule, are presumed to comply with this requirement and, as a result, present less litigation risk to lenders. For a loan to
qualify as a qualified mortgage, the loan must satisfy certain limits on terms and conditions, pricing and a maximum debt-to-
income ratio. Loans eligible for purchase, guarantee or insurance by a government agency or government-sponsored enterprise
are exempt from some of these requirements. Satisfying the qualified mortgage standards, ensuring correct calculations are
made for individual loans and recordkeeping and monitoring impose significant new compliance obligations on, and involve
compliance costs for, mortgage lenders, including the Company.
The CFPB's approach to consumer financial protection has varied substantially between the Obama and Trump Administrations
and could change in 2021, depending on the results of elections in November 2020.
Financial Privacy and Cybersecurity
Federal law currently contains extensive customer privacy protection provisions. Under these provisions, a financial institution
must provide to its customers, at the inception of the customer relationship and annually thereafter, the institution’s policies and
procedures regarding the handling of customers’ nonpublic personal financial information. These provisions also provide that,
with certain limited exceptions, an institution may not provide such personal information to unaffiliated third parties unless the
institution discloses to the customer that such information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt
out of such disclosure. Federal law makes it a criminal offense, except in limited circumstances, to obtain or attempt to obtain
customer information of a financial nature by fraudulent or deceptive means.
The federal banking agencies pay close attention to the cybersecurity practices of banks, bank holding companies and their
affiliates. The interagency council of the agencies, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (the “FFIEC”), has
issued several policy statements and other guidance for banks as new cybersecurity threats arise. The FFIEC has recently
focused on such matters as compromised customer credentials and business continuity planning. Examinations by the banking
agencies now include review of an institution’s information technology and its ability to thwart cyberattacks.
Anti-Money Laundering
The Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among
other things, to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering (“AML”) program. Under these laws and regulations,
the Bank is required to take steps to prevent the use of the Bank to facilitate the flow of illegal or illicit money, to report large
currency transactions and to file suspicious activity reports. In addition, the Bank is required to develop and implement a
comprehensive AML compliance program, as well as have in place appropriate “know your customer” policies and procedures.
Violations of these requirements can result in substantial civil and criminal sanctions. Also, the federal banking agencies are
required to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s AML activities when reviewing proposed bank mergers and
bank holding company acquisitions. The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury, in
addition to other bank regulatory agencies, is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of these
requirements and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with state and federal banking regulators, in addition
to the U.S. Department of Justice, the CFPB, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Internal Revenue Service.
19
OFAC Regulation
The Office of Foreign Assets Control, or “OFAC,” is responsible for administering economic sanctions that affect transactions
with designated foreign countries, nationals and others, as defined by various Executive Orders and in various pieces of
legislation. OFAC publishes lists of persons, organizations and countries suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist
acts, known as Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. If we or the Bank find a name on any transaction, account
or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, we or the Bank must freeze or block such account or transaction, file a suspicious
activity report and notify the appropriate authorities. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and
reputational consequences.
Fiscal and Monetary Policy
Banking is a business which depends on interest rate differentials for success. In general, the difference between the interest
paid by a bank on its deposits and its other borrowings, and the interest received by a bank on its loans and securities holdings,
constitutes the major portion of a bank’s earnings. Thus, our earnings and growth will be subject to the influence of economic
conditions generally, both domestic and foreign, and also to the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government
and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve administers monetary policy by setting target interest
rates that it attempts to effect, primarily through open market dealings in United States government securities. The Federal
Reserve also may specifically target banking institutions through the discount rate at which banks may borrow from the Federal
Reserve Banks and the reserve requirements on deposits. The nature and timing of any changes in such policies and their effect
on Ameris cannot be known at this time.
Fiscal policy, the other principal tool of the federal government to oversee the national economy, is largely in the hands of
congress through its authority to make taxation and budget decisions, subject to presidential approval. These decisions may
have a significant impact on the economic sectors in which we operate.
Other current and future legislation and the policies established by federal and state regulatory authorities will affect our future
operations. Banking legislation and regulations may limit our growth and the return to our investors by restricting certain of our
activities.
In addition, capital requirements could be changed and have the effect of restricting our activities or requiring additional capital
to be maintained. We cannot predict with certainty what changes, if any, will be made to existing federal and state legislation
and regulations or the effect that such changes may have on our business.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
Our Company has a correspondent relationship with the FHLB of Atlanta, which is one of 12 regional FHLBs that administer
the home financing credit function of savings companies. Each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within
its assigned region. FHLBs are funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB
system and make advances to members in accordance with policies and procedures, established by the Board of Directors of the
FHLB which are subject to the oversight of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. All advances from the FHLB are required to
be fully secured by sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB. In addition, all long-term advances are required to provide
funds for residential home financing.
The FHLB offers certain services to our Company such as processing checks and other items, buying and selling federal funds,
handling money transfers and exchanges, shipping coin and currency, providing security and safekeeping of funds or other
valuable items and furnishing limited management information and advice. As compensation for these services, our Company
maintains certain balances with the FHLB in interest-bearing accounts.
Under federal law, the FHLBs are required to provide funds for the resolution of troubled savings companies and to contribute
to low and moderately-priced housing programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on advances targeted for community
investment and low and moderate-income housing projects.
Real Estate Lending Evaluations
The federal regulators have adopted uniform standards for evaluations of loans secured by real estate or made to finance
improvements to real estate. Banks are required to establish and maintain written internal real estate lending policies consistent
with safe and sound banking practices and appropriate to the size of the institution and the nature and scope of its
20
operations. The regulations establish loan-to-value ratio limitations on real estate loans. Our Company’s loan policies establish
limits on loan-to-value ratios that are equal to or less than those established in such regulations.
Commercial Real Estate Concentrations
Our lending operations may be subject to enhanced scrutiny by federal banking regulators based on our concentration of
commercial real estate loans. The federal banking regulators previously issued guidance reminding financial institutions of the
risk posed by commercial real estate (“CRE”) lending concentrations. CRE loans generally include land development,
construction loans, and loans secured by multifamily property, and nonfarm, nonresidential real property where the primary
source of repayment is derived from rental income associated with the property. The guidance prescribes the following
guidelines for its examiners to help identify institutions that are potentially exposed to significant CRE risk and may warrant
greater supervisory scrutiny:
•
•
total reported loans for construction, land development and other land (“C&D”) represent 100% or more of the
institution’s total capital; or
total CRE loans represent 300% or more of the institution’s total capital, and the outstanding balance of the
institution’s CRE loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more.
As of December 31, 2019, excluding purchased non-covered and covered assets, our C&D concentration as a percentage of
capital totaled 61.4% and our CRE concentration, net of owner-occupied loans, as a percentage of capital totaled 148.4%.
Including purchased non-covered and covered loans subject to loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC, the Company’s C&D
concentration as a percentage of capital totaled 87.8% and our CRE concentration, net of owner-occupied loans, as a percentage
of capital totaled 238.4%.
Limitations on Incentive Compensation
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal banking regulators and other agencies, including the SEC, to issue regulations or
guidelines requiring disclosure to the regulators of incentive-based compensation arrangements and to prohibit incentive-based
compensation arrangements for directors, officers or employees that encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive
compensation, fees or benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to a financial institution. The federal bank regulatory
agencies have issued guidance on incentive compensation policies, which covers all employees who have the ability to
materially affect the risk profile of an institution, either individually or as part of a group, that is based upon the key principles
that a financial institution’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-
taking beyond the institution’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls
and risk management and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the
institution’s board of directors and appropriate policies, procedures and monitoring.
As part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations
will be reviewed, and the regulator’s findings will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect
the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking
organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a
risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct any
deficiencies.
In April 2016, the FDIC, the other federal banking agencies and other financial regulatory agencies proposed guidance on
incentive-based compensation arrangements. As applied to banks with total assets between $1 billion and $50 billion, the
proposal would (i) prohibit types and features of incentive-based compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks
because they are excessive or could lead to material financial loss, (ii) require such arrangements to strike a balance between
risk and reward, to be subject to effective risk management and controls, and to be subject to effective governance and (iii)
require appropriate board of directors (or committee) oversight and recordkeeping and disclosure to the appropriate agency. The
comment period for these proposed rules has closed, but the federal agencies have not finalized the proposal, and we do not
know whether or when they may do so.
The scope and content of federal bank regulatory agencies’ policies on executive compensation are continuing to develop and
are likely to continue evolving in the near future. It cannot be determined at this time whether compliance with such policies
will adversely affect the Company’s ability to hire, retain and motivate its key employees.
21
Evolving Legislation and Regulatory Action
From time to time, various legislative and regulatory initiatives are introduced in Congress and state legislatures, or by
regulatory agencies, that may impact the Company or the Bank. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract
the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution
regulatory system. Such legislation could change the operating environment of Ameris in substantial and unpredictable ways. If
enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect
the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions and other financial institutions. The Company cannot
predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would
have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies
applicable to the Company or the Bank could have a material effect on the business of the Company.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our Common Stock is subject to risks inherent in our business. The material risks and uncertainties that
management believes affect Ameris are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider
the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and
uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair
the Company’s business operations. This Annual Report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.
If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occurs, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations could
be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of the Common Stock could decline significantly, and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY AND INDUSTRY
Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can adversely affect our industry and business.
Our financial performance generally, and the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay the principal of outstanding loans
and the value of the collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services we offer, is
highly dependent upon the business and economic conditions in the markets in which we operate and in the United States as a
whole. Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions could lead to credit quality concerns related to repayment
ability and collateral protection, as well as reduced demand for the products and services we offer.
In recent years there has
been gradual improvement in the U.S. economy as evidenced by a rebound in the housing market, lower unemployment,
increased consumer demand and higher equities markets. However, economic growth and business spending appear to be
slowing, financial market volatility has increased and opinions vary on whether the U.S. economy can continue to keep growing
after more than a decade of growth and recovery following the Great Recession. Uncertainties also have arisen as a result of
increased tariffs and other changes to U.S. trade policies and reactions to such changes by China and other U.S. trading
partners, as well as impact from the recent coronavirus outbreak originating in Wuhan, China. In addition, economic growth in
international markets also appears to be slowing, particularly in China and Europe, which also may impact the economy and
financial markets in the United States. While we have no banking operations in Europe, the impact of Great Britain’s exit from
the Europe Union on British and European businesses, financial markets and related businesses in the United States could also
adversely affect financial markets generally. Our business also could be adversely affected directly by the default of another
institution or if the financial services industry experiences significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems.
Factors related to inflation, recession, unemployment, volatile interest rates, changes in tariffs and trade policies, international
conflicts, real estate values, energy prices, state and local municipal budget deficits, consumer confidence level, government
spending and any government shutdowns, the U.S. national debt, natural disasters, geopolitical events, public health crises
(such as the recent coronavirus outbreak) and other factors outside of our control also may assert economic pressures on
consumers and businesses and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.
We may face the following risks, among others, in connection with these events:
•
Unfavorable market conditions triggered by any of these events (such as, for example, the recent coronavirus outbreak)
can result in a deterioration in the credit quality of our borrowers and the demand for our products and services, an
increase in the number of loan delinquencies, defaults and charge-offs, additional provisions for loan losses, adverse
asset values and an overall material adverse effect on the quality of our loan portfolio.
22
•
•
•
•
Economic pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding continuing economic improvement resulting from any of
these events (including, but not limited to, the recent coronavirus outbreak) may result in changes in consumer and
business spending, borrowing and saving habits. Such conditions could have a material adverse effect on the credit
quality of our loans or our business, financial condition or results of operations.
The process we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires difficult, subjective, and complex
judgments, including qualitative factors that pertain to economic conditions and how these economic conditions might
impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. The level of uncertainty concerning economic conditions may
adversely affect the accuracy of our estimates which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the process.
The value of the portfolio of investment securities that we hold may be adversely affected by increasing interest rates
and defaults by debtors.
To the extent changes in the political environment have a negative impact on us or on the markets in which we operate
our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted in the future.
A trade war or other governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements or policies has the potential to
negatively impact ours and/or our customers’ costs, demand for our customers’ products and/or the U.S. economy or certain
sectors thereof and, thus, adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our revenues are highly correlated to market interest rates.
Our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature, and as a result, we are subject to significant risks tied to changes in
interest rates. Our ability to operate profitably is largely dependent upon net interest income. In 2019, net interest income made
up 71.8% of our revenue. Unexpected movement in interest rates, that may or may not change the slope of the current yield
curve, could cause our net interest margins to decrease, subsequently decreasing net interest income. In addition, such changes
could materially adversely affect the valuation of our assets and liabilities.
At present our one-year interest rate sensitivity position is mildly asset sensitive, such that a gradual increase in interest rates
during the next twelve months should have a slightly positive impact on net interest income during that period. However, as
with most financial institutions, our results of operations are affected by changes in interest rates and our ability to manage this
risk. The difference between interest rates charged on interest-earning assets and interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities
may be affected by changes in market interest rates, changes in relationships between interest rate indices, and changes in the
relationships between long-term and short-term market interest rates. In addition, the mix of assets and liabilities could change
as varying levels of market interest rates might present our customer base with more attractive options.
Certain changes in interest rates, inflation, deflation or the financial markets could affect demand for our products and our
ability to deliver products efficiently.
Loan originations, and potentially loan revenues, could be materially adversely impacted by sharply rising interest
rates. Conversely, sharply falling rates could increase prepayments within our securities portfolio lowering interest earnings
from those investments. An unanticipated increase in inflation could cause our operating costs related to salaries and benefits,
technology and supplies to increase at a faster pace than revenues.
The fair market value of our securities portfolio and the investment income from these securities also fluctuate depending on
general economic and market conditions. In addition, actual net investment income and/or cash flows from investments that
carry prepayment risk, such as mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, may differ from those anticipated at the time
of investment as a result of interest rate fluctuations.
Our concentration of real estate loans subjects the Company to risks that could materially adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
The majority of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate. As the economy deteriorated and depressed real estate values in
recent years, the collateral value of the portfolio and the revenue stream from those loans came under stress and required
additional provision to the allowance for loan losses. Our ability to dispose of foreclosed real estate and resolve credit quality
issues is dependent on real estate activity and real estate prices, both of which have been unpredictable for several years.
Greater loan losses than expected may materially adversely affect our earnings.
We, as lenders, are exposed to the risk that our customers will be unable to repay their loans in accordance with their terms and
that any collateral securing the payment of their loans may not be sufficient to assure repayment. Credit losses are inherent in
23
the business of making loans and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our credit risk with respect to
our real estate and construction loan portfolio will relate principally to the creditworthiness of business entities and the value of
the real estate serving as security for the repayment of loans. Our credit risk with respect to our commercial loan portfolio will
relate principally to the general creditworthiness of businesses within our local markets. Our credit risk with respect to our
consumer loan portfolio will relate principally to the general creditworthiness of individuals.
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio and provide an allowance for
estimated loan losses based on a number of factors. We believe that our current allowance for loan losses is adequate. However,
if our assumptions or judgments prove to be incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan
losses. We may have to increase our allowance in the future in response to the request of one of our primary banking regulators,
to adjust for changing conditions and assumptions, or as a result of any deterioration in the quality of our loan portfolio. The
actual amount of future provisions for loan losses cannot be determined at this time and may vary from the amounts of past
provisions.
Our business is highly correlated to local economic conditions in a geographically concentrated part of the United States.
Unlike larger organizations that are more geographically diversified, our banking offices are primarily concentrated in select
markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. As a result of this geographic concentration, our financial results
depend largely upon economic conditions in these market areas. Deterioration in economic conditions in the markets we serve
could result in one or more of the following:
•
•
•
•
an increase in loan delinquencies;
an increase in problem assets and foreclosures;
a decrease in the demand for our products and services; and
a decrease in the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power, the
value of assets associated with problem loans and collateral coverage.
We face additional risks due to our increased mortgage banking activities that could negatively impact net income and
profitability.
We sell the majority of the mortgage loans that we originate. The sale of these loans generates noninterest income and can be a
source of liquidity for the Bank. Disruption in the secondary market for residential mortgage loans as well as declines in real
estate values could result in one or more of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
our inability to sell mortgage loans on the secondary market, which could negatively impact our liquidity position;
declines in real estate values could decrease the potential of mortgage originations, which could negatively impact our
earnings;
if it is determined that loans were made in breach of our representations and warranties to the secondary market, we
could incur losses associated with the loans;
increased compliance requirements could result in higher compliance costs, higher foreclosure proceedings or lower
loan origination volume, all which could negatively impact future earnings; and
a rise in interest rates could cause a decline in mortgage originations, which could negatively impact our earnings.
Legislation and regulatory proposals enacted in response to market and economic conditions may materially adversely affect
our business and results of operations.
The banking industry is heavily regulated. We are subject to examinations, supervision and comprehensive regulation by
various federal and state agencies. Our compliance with these regulations is costly and restricts certain of our activities.
Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect the federal deposit insurance fund and depositors, not shareholders. The
burden imposed by federal and state regulations puts banks at a competitive disadvantage compared to less regulated
competitors such as finance companies, mortgage banking companies and leasing companies. Changes in the laws, regulations
and regulatory practices affecting the banking industry and our compliance with them may increase our costs of doing business
or otherwise adversely affect us and create competitive advantages for others. Federal economic and monetary policies may
also affect our ability to attract deposits and other funding sources, make loans and investments and achieve satisfactory interest
spreads.
24
Our growth and financial performance may be negatively impacted if we are unable to successfully execute our growth
plans.
Economic conditions and other factors, such as our ability to identify appropriate markets for expansion, our ability to recruit
and retain qualified personnel, our ability to fund earning asset growth at a reasonable and profitable level, sufficient capital to
support our growth initiatives, competitive factors and banking laws, will impact our success.
We may seek to supplement our internal growth through acquisitions. We cannot predict with certainty the number, size or
timing of acquisitions, or whether any such acquisitions will occur at all. Our acquisition efforts have traditionally focused on
targeted banking entities in markets in which we currently operate and markets in which we believe we can compete
effectively. However, as consolidation of the financial services industry continues, the competition for suitable acquisition
candidates may increase. We may compete with other financial services companies for acquisition opportunities, and many of
these competitors have greater financial resources than we do and may be able to pay more for an acquisition than we are able
or willing to pay. We also may need additional debt or equity financing in the future to fund acquisitions. We may not be able
to obtain additional financing or, if available, it may not be in amounts and on terms acceptable to us. If we are unable to locate
suitable acquisition candidates willing to sell on terms acceptable to us, or we are otherwise unable to obtain additional debt or
equity financing necessary for us to continue making acquisitions, we would be required to find other methods to grow our
business and we may not grow at the same rate we have in the past, or at all.
Generally, we must receive federal regulatory approval before we can acquire a bank or bank holding company. In determining
whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, federal bank regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the
acquisition on the competition, financial condition and future prospects. The regulators also review current and projected capital
ratios and levels, the competence, experience and integrity of management and its record of compliance with laws and
regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served (including both institutions' CRA performance history)
and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities. We cannot be certain when or if, or
on what terms and conditions, any required regulatory approvals will be granted. We may also be required to sell banks or
branches as a condition to receiving regulatory approval, which condition may not be acceptable to us or, if acceptable to us,
may reduce the benefits of any acquisition.
In the past, we have utilized de novo branching in new and existing markets as a way to supplement our growth. De novo
branching and any acquisition carry with it numerous risks, including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the inability to obtain all required regulatory approvals;
significant costs and anticipated operating losses associated with establishing a de novo branch or a new bank;
the inability to secure the services of qualified senior management;
the local market may not accept the services of a new bank owned and managed by a bank holding company
headquartered outside of the market area of the new bank;
economic downturns in the new market;
the inability to obtain attractive locations within a new market at a reasonable cost; and
the additional strain on management resources and internal systems and controls.
We have experienced to some extent many of these risks with our de novo branching to date.
We rely on dividends from the Bank for most of our revenue.
Ameris is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends
from the Bank. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Common Stock and interest and
principal on the Company’s debt. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank
may pay to the Company. Also, the Company’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or
reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the
Company, the Company may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on the Common Stock and its
business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. Consequently, cash-based
activities, including further investments in the Bank or in support of the Bank, could require borrowings or additional issuances
of common or preferred stock.
25
We are subject to regulation by various federal and state entities.
We are subject to the regulations of the SEC, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the GDBF, the CFPB and other governmental
agencies and regulatory bodies. New regulations issued by these agencies may adversely affect our ability to carry on our
business activities. We are subject to various federal and state laws and certain changes in these laws and regulations may
adversely affect our operations. Noncompliance with certain of these regulations may impact our business plans, including our
ability to branch, offer certain products or execute existing or planned business strategies.
We are also subject to the accounting rules and regulations of the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Changes
in accounting rules could materially adversely affect the reported financial statements or our results of operations and may also
require extraordinary efforts or additional costs to implement. Any of these laws or regulations may be modified or changed
from time to time, and we cannot be assured that such modifications or changes will not adversely affect us.
A new accounting standard will result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may materially
adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial
Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current
“incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the Current Expected Credit
Loss (“CECL”) model. Under the CECL model, we will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost,
such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The
measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current
conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will
take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly
from the “incurred loss” model required under current generally accepted accounting principles, which delays recognition until
it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how
we determine our allowance for loan losses and could require us to significantly increase our allowance. Moreover, the CECL
model may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses. If we are required to materially increase our level
of allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The new CECL accounting standard will become effective for us for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently finalizing our evaluation of the impact the CECL model will have on
our accounting, but we expect to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to equity and the allowance for loan losses
as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective. We currently estimate our allowance for
loan losses will increase to a range of $85 million to $120 million, and we expect to recognize a liability for unfunded
commitments between $10 million and $20 million. However, the final impact of our transition to the CECL model may differ
from these estimates.
Our total consolidated assets increased to over $10 billion as of June 30, 2018, which will subject us to additional
regulations and oversight that were not previously applicable to us and that will impact our revenues and/or expenses.
Upon completion of the acquisition of Hamilton in June 2018, the Company and the Bank exceeded $10 billion in total
consolidated assets. As a result, certain additional requirements now apply to the Company or the Bank, including the
following: (i) the examination and enforcement authority of the CFPB with respect to consumer and small business products
and services; (ii) deposit insurance premium assessments based on an FDIC scorecard based on, among other things, the Bank’s
CAMELS rating and results of asset-related stress testing and funding-related stress testing; and (iii) a cap on interchange
transaction fees for debit cards, as required by Federal Reserve regulations, which will significantly reduce our interchange
revenue.
It is difficult to predict the overall compliance cost of these provisions. However, compliance with these provisions will likely
require additional staffing, engagement of external consultants and other operating costs that could have a material adverse
effect on the future financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
We are subject to industry competition which may have an impact upon our success.
Our profitability depends on our ability to compete successfully. We operate in a highly competitive financial services
environment. Certain competitors are larger and may have more resources than we do. We face competition in our regional
market areas from other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, internet banks, mortgage companies,
26
finance companies, mutual funds,
insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking firms, and other financial
intermediaries that offer similar services. Some of our nonbank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations
that govern us or our bank subsidiary and may have greater flexibility in competing for business.
Another competitive factor is that the financial services market, including banking services, is undergoing rapid changes with
frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. Our future success may depend, in part, on our ability
to use technology competitively to provide products and services that provide convenience to customers and create additional
efficiencies in our operations.
Changes in the policies of monetary authorities and other government action could materially adversely affect our
profitability.
The results of our operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. The
instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve include open market operations in U.S. government
securities, changes in the discount rate or the federal funds rate on bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against
bank deposits. In view of uncertain conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, we cannot predict with
certainty possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or our business and earnings.
We may need to rely on the financial markets to provide needed capital.
Our Common Stock is listed and traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”). If the liquidity of the Nasdaq market
should fail to operate at a time when we may seek to raise equity capital, or if conditions in the capital markets are adverse, we
may be constrained in raising capital. Downgrades in the opinions of the analysts that follow our Company may cause our stock
price to fall and significantly limit our ability to access the markets for additional capital. Should these risks materialize, our
ability to further expand our operations through internal growth or acquisition may be limited.
We may invest or spend the proceeds in stock offerings in ways with which you may not agree and in ways that may not earn
a profit.
We may choose to use the proceeds of future stock offerings for general corporate purposes, including for possible acquisition
opportunities that may become available. It is not known whether suitable acquisition opportunities may become available or
whether we will be able to successfully complete any such acquisitions. We may use the proceeds of an offering only to focus
on sustaining our organic, or internal, growth or for other purposes. In addition, we may use all or a portion of the proceeds of
an offering to support our capital. You may not agree with the ways we decide to use the proceeds of any stock offerings, and
our use of the proceeds may not yield any profits.
The transition away from the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) will affect our adjustable rate loan and other
agreements and may have an impact on our business operations.
In 2014, a committee of private-market derivative participants and their regulators, the Alternative Reference Rate Committee
(the “ARRC”), was convened by the Federal Reserve to identify an alternative reference interest rate to replace LIBOR. In June
2017, the ARRC announced the Secured Overnight Funding Rate (“SOFR”), a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash
overnight collateralized by Treasury securities, as its preferred alternative to LIBOR. In July 2017, the Chief Executive of the
United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced its intention to stop persuading or
compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR to the administrator of LIBOR after 2021. In April 2018, the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York began to publish SOFR rates on a daily basis. In 2019, the ARRC finalized draft language
for adjustable rate debt product contracts to provide for the transition from LIBOR to SOFR rates. The language is voluntary
and would apply only to new contracts. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has said that in early 2020 it will begin to
publish SOFR “term rates” which would provide replacements for specific LIBOR term rates.
Given LIBOR’s extensive use across financial markets, the transition away from LIBOR presents various risks and challenges
to financial markets and institutions, including Ameris and the Bank. Our commercial and consumer businesses issue, trade
and hold various products that are indexed to LIBOR. As of December 31, 2019, Ameris had approximately $2.81 billion of
loans and derivatives with a notional value of $57.8 million, indexed to LIBOR. In addition, we had approximately $309.5
million of debt securities outstanding that are indexed to LIBOR (either currently or in the future) as of December 31, 2019.
We had $109.9 million of investment securities indexed to LIBOR as of December 31, 2019. Our financial instruments and
products that are indexed to LIBOR are significant, and if not sufficiently planned for, the discontinuation of LIBOR could
result in financial, operational, legal, reputational or compliance risks.
27
We face risks related to our operational, technological and organizational infrastructure.
Our ability to grow and compete is dependent on our ability to build or acquire the necessary operational and technological
infrastructure and to manage the cost of that infrastructure while we expand. Similar to other large corporations, in our case,
operational risk can manifest itself in many ways, such as errors related to failed or inadequate processes, faulty or disabled
computer systems, fraud by employees or persons outside of our Company and exposure to external events. We are dependent
on our operational infrastructure to help manage these risks. In addition, we are heavily dependent on the strength and
capability of our technology systems which we use both to interface with our customers and to manage our internal financial
and other systems. Our ability to develop and deliver new products that meet the needs of our existing customers and attract
new customers depends in part on the functionality of our technology systems. Additionally, our ability to run our business in
compliance with applicable laws and regulations is dependent on these infrastructures.
We continuously monitor our operational and technological capabilities and make modifications and improvements when we
believe it will be cost effective to do so. In some instances, we may build and maintain these capabilities ourselves. We also
outsource some of these functions to third parties. These third parties may experience errors or disruptions that could adversely
impact us and over which we may have limited control. We also face risk from the integration of new infrastructure platforms
and/or new third party providers of such platforms into our existing businesses.
Cyberattacks or other security breaches could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In the normal course of business, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential information regarding our customers.
We also have arrangements in place with other third parties through which we share and receive information about their
customers who are or may become our customers. Although we devote significant resources and management focus to ensuring
the integrity of our systems through information security and business continuity programs, our facilities and systems, and those
of third-party service providers, are vulnerable to external or internal security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses,
misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors or other similar events.
Information security risks for financial institutions like us continue to increase in part because of new technologies, the use of
the Internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business
transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and
others. In addition to cyberattacks or other security breaches involving the theft of sensitive and confidential information,
hackers continue to engage in attacks against financial institutions. These attacks include denial of service attacks designed to
disrupt external customer facing services and ransomware attacks designed to deny organizations access to key internal
resources or systems. We are not able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of
these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of
sources. We employ detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents, but early detection
may be thwarted by sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Accordingly, we also face risks related to
cyberattacks and other security breaches in connection with our own and third-party systems, processes and data, including
credit and debit card transactions that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding our customers
through various third parties, including merchant acquiring banks, payment processors, payment card networks (e.g., Visa,
MasterCard) and our processors. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyberattacks,
and because the transactions involve third parties and environments such as the point of sale that we do not control or secure,
future security breaches or cyberattacks affecting any of these third parties could impact us through no fault of our own, and in
some cases we may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. We also rely on numerous other
third-party service providers to conduct other aspects of our business operations and face similar risks relating to them. While
we conduct security reviews on these third parties, we cannot be sure that their information security protocols are sufficient to
withstand a cyberattack or other security breach.
The access by unauthorized persons to, or the improper disclosure by us of, confidential information regarding our customers or
our own proprietary information, software, methodologies and business secrets could result in significant legal and financial
exposure, supervisory liability, damage to our reputation or a loss of confidence in the security of our systems, products and
services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition,
our industry continues to experience well-publicized attacks or breaches affecting others in our industry that have heightened
concern by consumers generally about the security of using credit and debit cards, which have caused some consumers,
including our customers, to use our credit and debit cards less in favor of alternative methods of payment and has led to
increased regulatory focus on, and potentially new regulations relating to, these methods. Further cyberattacks or other breaches
in the future, whether affecting us or others, could intensify consumer concern and regulatory focus and result in reduced use of
28
our cards and increased costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. To the extent we are involved
in any future cyberattacks or other breaches, our brand and reputation could be affected, which could also have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that may adversely affect our ability
to prepare our consolidated financial statements in a timely and accurate manner.
As further described in Item 9A below, management has identified a material weakness in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal
control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The Company identified a control deficiency related to
certain general ledger account reconciliations that began as of the conversion of Fidelity’s core platform on November 3, 2019.
While the reconciliations were completed in a timely manner, various items, which were principally related to the acquired
indirect auto loan portfolio, were not researched and resolved in a timely manner. Further review and analysis indicate that
clearing of the items did not have any material adverse impact to customer account balances or the Company's results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. However, this control deficiency creates a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not have been prevented or detected on a timely basis, and
as such, management has concluded that the control deficiency represents a material weakness in internal control over financial
reporting.
Management has been actively engaged during the first quarter of 2020 in developing remediation plans to address the material
weakness. These plans include: (i) additional training for accounting staff performing the reconciliations; (ii) development of
more detailed reconciliation procedures to allow for more timely research and resolution of items; (iii) increased personnel in
the accounting department to ensure timeliness of clearing reconciling items; and (iv) the review of the system interface to the
general ledger such that the number of reconciling items among impacted balance sheet accounts will be reduced.
If our remediation efforts are insufficient to address the material weakness, or if additional material weaknesses in our internal
control are discovered or occur in the future, a material misstatement in our consolidated financial statements could occur that
may continue undetected.
Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, the Company may rely on information furnished by or on
behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. The
Company may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent
auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements,
credit reports or other financial information could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and, in turn, the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Reputational risk and social factors may impact our results.
Our ability to originate and maintain accounts is highly dependent upon customer and other external perceptions of our business
practices and our financial health. Adverse perceptions regarding our business practices or our financial health could damage
our reputation in both the customer and funding markets, leading to difficulties in generating and maintaining accounts as well
as in financing them. Adverse developments with respect to the consumer or other external perceptions regarding the practices
of our competitors, or our industry as a whole, may also adversely impact our reputation. In addition, adverse reputational
impacts on third parties with whom we have important relationships may also adversely impact our reputation. Adverse impacts
on our reputation, or the reputation of our industry, may also result in greater regulatory or legislative scrutiny, which may lead
to laws, regulations or regulatory actions that may change or constrain the manner in which we engage with our customers and
the products we offer. Adverse reputational impacts or events may also increase our litigation risk. We carefully monitor
internal and external developments for areas of potential reputational risk and have established governance structures to assist in
evaluating such risks in our business practices and decisions, but we cannot be certain that our efforts will completely mitigate
these risks.
We may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.
29
The Company’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in
most activities engaged in by the Company can be intense and the Company may not be able to hire people or to retain
them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of the Company’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on
the Company’s business because of their skills, knowledge of the Company’s market, years of industry experience and the
difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
We engage in acquisitions of other businesses from time to time. These acquisitions may not produce revenue or earnings
enhancements or cost savings at levels or within timeframes originally anticipated and may result in unforeseen integration
difficulties.
When appropriate opportunities arise, we will engage in acquisitions of other businesses. Difficulty in integrating an acquired
business or company may cause us not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product
presence or other anticipated benefits from any acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition
(run-off), loss of key employees, disruption of our business or the business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely
affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the
acquisition. We will likely need to make additional investments in equipment and personnel to manage higher asset levels and
loan balances as a result of any significant acquisition, which may materially adversely impact our earnings. Also, the negative
effect of any divestitures required by regulatory authorities in acquisitions or business combinations may be greater than
expected.
Depending on the condition of any institution that we may acquire, any acquisition may, at least in the near term, materially
adversely affect our capital and earnings and, if not successfully integrated following the acquisition, may continue to have such
effects.
Natural disasters, geopolitical events, public health crises and other catastrophic events beyond our control could adversely
affect us.
Natural disasters such as hurricanes, tropical storms, floods, wildfires, extreme weather conditions and other acts of nature,
geopolitical events such as those involving civil unrest, changes in government regimes, terrorism or military conflict, and
pandemics and other public health crises, such as the recent outbreaks of novel coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China, and
other catastrophic events could adversely affect our business operations and those of our customers, counterparties and service
providers, and cause substantial damage and loss to real and personal property, including damage to or destruction of
mortgaged properties or our own banking facilities and offices. Natural disasters, geopolitical events, public health crises and
other catastrophic events, or concerns about the occurrence of any such events, could impair our borrowers’ ability to service
their loans, decrease the level and duration of deposits by customers, erode the value of loan collateral, including mortgaged
properties, result in an increase in the amount of our non-performing loans and a higher level of non-performing assets,
including real estate owned, net charge-offs and provision for loan losses, lead to other operational difficulties and impair our
ability to manage our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations and the value of our common stock. We also could be adversely affected if our key personnel or a significant
number of our employees were to become unavailable due to a public health crisis (such as an outbreak of a contagious
disease), natural disaster, war, act of terrorism, accident or other reason.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK
The price of our Common Stock is volatile and may decline.
The trading price of our Common Stock may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our
control. In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading volumes that affect the market
prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations have adversely affected and may continue to adversely
affect the market price of our Common Stock. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;
changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts
or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other financial institutions;
failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;
speculation in the press or investment community;
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
actions by institutional shareholders;
fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;
30
•
•
•
•
•
general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services
industry;
proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments, including changes in accounting rules;
proposed or adopted changes or developments in tax policies or rates;
anticipated or pending investigations, proceedings or litigation that involve or affect us; or
domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance.
A significant decline in our stock price could result in substantial losses for individual shareholders and could lead to costly and
disruptive securities litigation.
Securities issued by us, including our Common Stock, are not FDIC insured.
Securities issued by us, including our Common Stock, are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of any bank and
are not insured by the FDIC, the Deposit Insurance Fund or any other governmental agency or instrumentality, or any private
insurer, and are subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.
Holders of the Company’s debt obligations and any shares of the Company’s preferred stock that may be outstanding in the
future will have priority over the Company’s common stock with respect to payment in the event of liquidation, dissolution
or winding up and with respect to the payment of interest and preferred dividends.
In the event of any winding up and termination of the Company, our Common Stock would rank below all claims of the holders
of the Company’s debt and any preferred stock then outstanding. As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding trust preferred
securities and accompanying junior subordinated debentures with a carrying value of $127.6 million and other subordinated
notes payable with a carrying value of $268.2 million.
Upon the winding up and termination of the Company, holders of our Common Stock will not be entitled to receive any
payment or other distribution of assets until after all of our obligations to our debt holders have been satisfied and holders of our
senior debt, subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures issued in connection with trust preferred securities have
received any payments and other distributions due to them.
In addition, we are required to pay interest on our senior debt,
subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures issued in connection with the Company’s trust preferred securities before
we pay any dividends on our Common Stock.
We may borrow funds or issue additional debt and equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, any of
which may be senior to our Common Stock as to distributions and in liquidation, which could negatively affect the value of
our Common Stock.
In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by entering into debt or debt-like financing that is unsecured or
secured by all or up to all of our assets, or by issuing additional debt or equity securities, which could include issuances of
secured or unsecured commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior notes, subordinated notes, preferred stock, common stock
or securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities. In the event of our liquidation, our lenders and holders of
our debt and preferred securities would receive a distribution of our available assets before distributions to the holders of our
Common Stock. Because our decision to incur debt and issue securities in our future offerings will depend on market conditions
and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate with certainty the amount, timing or nature of our future
offerings and debt financings. Further, market conditions could require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our
securities in the future. In addition, the borrowing of funds or issuance of debt would increase our leverage and decrease our
liquidity, and the issuance of additional equity securities would dilute the interests of our existing shareholders.
You may not receive dividends on the Common Stock.
Holders of our Common Stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds
legally available for such payments. In 2010, in response to anticipated increases in corporate risks, our Board suspended the
payment of dividends on our Common Stock. In 2014, our Board reinstated the payment of dividends on our Common Stock;
however, the payment of dividends could be suspended again at any time.
Sales of a significant number of shares of our Common Stock in the public markets, or the perception of such sales, could
depress the market price of our Common Stock.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public markets and the availability of those shares for sale
could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, future issuances of equity securities, including
pursuant to outstanding options, could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders and could cause the market price of our
31
Common Stock to decline. We may issue such additional equity or convertible securities to raise additional capital. Depending
on the amount offered and the levels at which we offer the stock, issuances of common or preferred stock could be substantially
dilutive to shareholders of our Common Stock. Moreover, to the extent that we issue restricted stock, phantom shares, stock
appreciation rights, options or warrants to purchase our Common Stock in the future and those stock appreciation rights, options
or warrants are exercised or as shares of the restricted stock vest, our shareholders may experience further dilution. Holders of
our shares of Common Stock have no preemptive rights that entitle holders to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of
shares of any class or series and, therefore, such sales or offerings could result in increased dilution to our shareholders. We
cannot predict with certainty the effect that future sales of our Common Stock would have on the market price of our Common
Stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company’s corporate headquarters is located at 3490 Piedmont Road N.E., Suite 1550, Atlanta, Georgia 30305. The
Company occupies approximately 19,200 square feet at this location plus an additional 32,100 square feet used for a branch
location and support services for banking operations, including credit, marketing and operational support. The Company also
leases approximately 156,500 square feet in Atlanta and Jacksonville, Florida used for additional corporate support services.
Inclusive of the branch at its headquarters, Ameris operates 170 office or branch locations. Of the 170 branch locations, 148 are
owned and 22 are subject to either building or ground leases. Ameris also operates 31 mortgage and loan production offices, all
of which are subject to building leases. At December 31, 2019, there were no significant encumbrances on the offices,
equipment or other operational facilities owned by Ameris and the Bank.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is, and has been, involved in various legal proceedings with William J. Villari, who formerly owned USPF, and
entities that Mr. Villari owns. First, on December 13, 2018, Mr. Villari filed a demand for arbitration, claiming that the Bank’s
termination of his employment for “cause” was improper and that he was entitled to additional compensation from the
Company and the Bank under his employment agreement. Second, on December 28, 2018, Mr. Villari and his wholly owned
company, P1 Finance Holdings LLC (“P1”), filed a lawsuit against the Bank in Broward County, Florida, seeking additional
compensation for his service while an employee, as well as other relief. Third, on May 30, 2019, CEBV LLC (“CEBV”),
which also is wholly owned by Mr. Villari, filed a lawsuit against the Bank in Duval County, Florida, arising out of a loan
purchase agreement with the Bank dated May 8, 2018. CEBV’s complaint in that lawsuit, which also names as a defendant the
Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Dennis J. Zember Jr., seeks unspecified damages and other relief related to asserted
claims for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract based on the Bank’s alleged failure to provide sufficient assistance to
CEBV in collecting on loans purchased by CEBV from the Bank.
In addition, on January 30, 2019, the Company and the Bank filed a lawsuit against Mr. Villari in Dekalb County, Georgia,
asserting claims for unspecified damages arising from Mr. Villari’s alleged failure to disclose material information in
connection with the sale of USPF to the Company and the Bank.
In the first of these proceedings to be adjudicated, the Company and the Bank received on November 20, 2019, an Order and
Award from the American Arbitration Association in which the arbitrator ruled that the Company and the Bank had cause to
terminate Mr. Villari and had properly exercised that right and that, as a result, Mr. Villari is not entitled to any additional
payments under his employment agreement or a separate management and licensing agreement with the Bank.
We believe the remaining allegations of Mr. Villari, P1 and CEBV in their complaints are without merit, and we are vigorously
defending the cases. We believe that the amount or any estimable range of reasonably possible or probable loss in connection
with these matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of
operations or financial condition of the Company.
On November 19, 2019, the Company received a subpoena from the Atlanta Regional Office of the SEC, and the Bank received
a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia, each requesting that the
Company and the Bank produce documents and other materials relating to the Company’s acquisition of USPF, the Bank’s sale
of certain loans to CEBV and related disclosures. The Company intends to cooperate fully with the investigation and is
currently producing documents in response to the subpoenas. The Company is unable to make any assurances regarding the
32
outcome of the investigation or the impact, if any, that the investigation may have on the Company’s business, consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Furthermore, from time to time, the Company and the Bank are subject to various legal proceedings, claims and disputes that
arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company and the Bank are also subject to regulatory examinations, information
gathering requests, inquiries and investigations in the ordinary course of business. Based on the Company’s current knowledge,
management presently does not believe that the liabilities arising from these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, it is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these legal matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial
condition for any particular period.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
33
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Common Stock is listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “ABCB”. As of February 29, 2020, there were approximately 2,969
holders of record of the Common Stock. The Company believes a portion of Common Stock outstanding is held either in
nominee name or street name brokerage accounts; therefore, the Company is unable to determine the number of beneficial
owners of the Common Stock.
The amount of and nature of any dividends declared on our Common Stock will be determined by our Board of Directors in its
sole discretion. The Company is required to comply with the restrictions on the payment of dividends in respect of the Common
Stock discussed in the section of Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report captioned “Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions.”
Repurchases of Common Stock
The table below sets forth information regarding the Company’s repurchase of shares of its outstanding common stock during
the three-month period ended December 31, 2019.
Period
October 1, 2019 through October 31, 2019
November 1, 2019 through November 30, 2019
December 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019
Total
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
Average Price
Paid Per Share
— $
— $
158,248 $
158,248 $
—
—
43.28
43.28
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares That
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs(1)
100,000,000
— $
— $
100,000,000
— $
— $
93,151,027
93,151,027
(1) On September 19, 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to
$100.0 million of its outstanding common stock. Repurchases of shares, which are authorized to occur through October
31, 2020, will be made, if at all, in accordance with applicable securities laws and may be made from time to time in the
open market or by negotiated transactions. The amount and timing of repurchases will be based on a variety of factors,
including share acquisition price, regulatory limitations and other market and economic factors. The program does not
require the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares. As of December 31, 2019, $6.8 million, or 158,248
shares of the Company's common stock, had been repurchased under the new program.
34
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the change in the cumulative total shareholder return on the Common Stock against
the cumulative return of the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) index and the index of SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ
Stocks for the five-year period commencing December 31, 2014, and ending December 31, 2019. This line graph assumes an
investment of $100 on December 31, 2014, and reinvestment of dividends and other distributions to shareholders.
Total Return Performance
e
u
l
a
V
x
e
d
n
I
250
200
150
100
50
12/31/14
12/31/15
12/31/16
12/31/17
12/31/18
12/31/19
Ameris Bancorp
NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)
SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ
Index
Ameris Bancorp
NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)
SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence
Period Ending
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
12/31/2017
12/31/2018
12/31/2019
100.00
100.00
100.00
133.50
106.96
107.95
172.72
116.45
149.68
192.57
150.96
157.58
127.68
146.67
132.82
173.09
200.49
166.75
Pursuant to the regulations of the SEC, this performance graph is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed filed with the SEC
and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
35
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents selected consolidated financial information for Ameris. The data set forth below is derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements of Ameris. Acquisitions, including the branch acquisition in 2015, the acquisition
of Merchants in 2015, the acquisition of JAXB in 2016, the acquisitions of USPF, Atlantic and Hamilton in 2018, and the
acquisition of Fidelity in 2019, as well as the December 2016 purchase of a pool of commercial insurance premium finance
loans and the establishment of a division to originate loans of this type, significantly affected the comparability of selected
financial data. Specifically, since the acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, the assets of
the acquired institutions were recorded at their fair values, the excess purchase price over the net fair value of the assets was
recorded as goodwill and the results of operations for the business have been included in the Company’s results since the
respective dates these acquisitions were completed. Accordingly, the level of our assets and liabilities and our results of
financial position and results of
operations
operations. Discussion of these acquisitions can be found in the “Corporate Restructuring and Business Combinations” section
of Part I, Item 1. of this Annual Report and in Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the notes to consolidated financial
statements. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere herein.
significantly affected the Company’s
acquisitions have
these
for
36
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2018
2016
2015
Total assets
Earning assets
Loans held for sale
Loans
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Investment securities
$ 18,242,579
$11,443,515 $ 7,856,203
$ 6,892,031
$ 5,588,940
16,321,373
10,348,393
7,288,285
6,293,670
5,084,658
1,656,711
111,298
197,442
105,924
111,182
7,529,987
5,660,457
4,856,514
3,626,821
2,406,877
5,075,281
2,588,832
213,208
262,625
1,403,403
1,192,423
861,595
328,246
810,873
—
1,069,191
568,314
822,735
—
909,083
592,963
783,185
6,301
FDIC loss-share receivable, net of clawback
—
—
Total deposits
14,027,073
9,649,313
6,625,845
5,575,163
4,879,290
FDIC loss-share payable including clawback
19,642
19,487
8,803
6,313
—
Shareholders’ equity
2,469,582
1,456,347
804,479
646,437
514,759
Selected Average Balances:
Total assets
Earning assets
Loans held for sale
Loans
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Investment securities
Total deposits
Shareholders’ equity
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
$ 14,621,185
$ 9,744,001
$ 7,330,974
$ 6,166,714
$ 4,804,245
13,128,229
8,861,205
6,759,509
5,598,077
4,320,948
667,078
140,273
113,657
97,995
87,952
6,865,526
5,415,757
4,188,378
2,777,505
2,161,726
3,562,229
1,712,924
239,223
297,850
1,400,440
1,036,822
958,738
496,844
861,189
1,127,765
619,440
842,886
918,796
201,689
731,165
11,702,441
7,862,988
5,845,430
5,200,241
4,126,885
1,970,780
1,178,275
770,296
613,435
492,242
$
636,394
$
413,326
$
294,347
$
239,065
$
190,393
131,228
505,166
19,758
198,113
471,937
211,584
50,143
69,934
343,392
16,667
118,412
293,647
151,490
30,463
34,222
260,125
8,364
104,457
231,936
124,282
50,734
19,694
219,371
4,091
105,801
215,835
105,246
33,146
$
161,441
$
121,027
$
73,548
$
72,100
$
14,856
175,537
5,264
85,586
199,115
56,744
15,897
40,847
37
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Per Share Data
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2018
2016
2015
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common book value
Tangible book value
Common dividends – cash
$
$
2.76
2.75
35.53
20.81
0.50
$
2.81
2.80
30.66
18.83
0.40
$
2.00
1.98
21.59
17.86
0.40
$
2.10
2.08
18.51
14.42
0.30
1.29
1.27
15.98
12.65
0.20
Profitability Ratios
Net income to average total assets
Net income to average common shareholders’
equity
Net interest margin
Efficiency ratio
Loan Quality Ratios
1.10 %
1.24 %
1.00 %
1.17 %
0.85 %
8.19
3.88
67.11
10.27
3.92
63.59
9.55
3.95
63.62
11.75
3.99
66.38
8.37
4.12
76.25
Net charge-offs to average loans*
0.15 %
0.27 %
0.13 %
0.11 %
0.22 %
Allowance for loan losses to total loans *
Nonperforming assets to total loans and
OREO**
0.46
0.77
0.46
0.72
0.44
0.85
0.56
1.12
0.85
1.60
Liquidity Ratios
Loans to total deposits
91.38 %
88.21 %
91.25 %
94.42 %
80.11 %
Average loans to average earnings assets
Noninterest-bearing deposits to total deposits
81.25
29.94
83.81
26.12
83.50
26.82
80.83
28.22
75.96
27.26
Capital Adequacy Ratios
Shareholders’ equity to total assets
13.54 %
12.73 %
10.24 %
9.38 %
9.21 %
Common stock dividend payout ratio
18.12
14.23
20.00
14.29
15.50
*
**
Excludes purchased non-covered and purchased loan pools.
Excludes assets covered under FDIC loss share agreements.
38
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
During 2019, the Company reported net income of $161.4 million, or $2.75 per diluted share, compared with $121.0 million, or
$2.80 per diluted share, in 2018. The Company’s net income as a percentage of average assets for 2019 and 2018 was 1.10%
and 1.24%, respectively, while the Company’s net income as a percentage of average shareholders’ equity was 8.19% and
10.27%, respectively. Reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes $73.1 million in merger and
conversion charges, primarily related to the acquisition of Fidelity, compared with $20.5 million for 2018, primarily related to
the acquisitions of Hamilton, Atlantic and USPF.
Highlights of the Company’s performance in 2019 include the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Growth in adjusted net earnings1 of $76.7 million, representing a 52.5% increase over 2018
Organic growth in loans of $751.8 million, or 9.2%, compared with $482.6 million, or 8.5%, in 2018
Adjusted return on average assets1 of 1.52%, compared with 1.50% in 2018
Adjusted return on average tangible common equity1 of 18.74%, compared with 19.18% in 2018
Net interest margin of 3.88% during 2019, down 4 basis points from 2018 amid challenging interest rate environment
Loan-to-deposit ratio at the end of 2019 of 91.4%, compared with 88.2% at the end of 2018
Improvement in deposit mix with noninterest bearing deposits representing 29.9% of total deposits at the end of 2019
Increase in total revenue of 52.3% to $703.3 million
Annualized net charge-offs of 0.10% of average total loans and 0.15% of average non-purchased loans
Continued management of nonperforming assets, approximately flat at 0.56% of total assets compared with 2018
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 A reconciliation of Non-GAAP financial measures can be found in following table.
39
Adjusted Net Income Reconciliation
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
Net income available to common shareholders
Adjustment items:
Merger and conversion charges
Executive retirement benefits
Restructuring charge
Servicing right impairment
Expenses related to SEC and DOJ investigation
Financial impact of hurricanes
Gain on BOLI proceeds
Loss on sale of premises
Tax effect of adjustment items (Note 1)
After-tax adjustment items
Tax expense attributable to merger related compensation and acquired BOLI
Reduction in state tax expense accrued in prior year, net of federal tax impact
Adjusted net income
Average assets
Reported return on average assets
Adjusted return on average assets
Average common equity
Average tangible common equity
Reported return on average common equity
Adjusted return on average tangible common equity
Year Ended
December 31,
2019
161,441
$
2018
121,027
$
73,105
—
245
507
463
(39)
(3,583)
6,021
(16,065)
60,654
849
—
222,944
$
20,499
8,424
983
—
—
882
—
1,033
(4,923)
26,898
—
(1,717)
146,208
$
$14,621,185
1.10 %
1.52 %
$ 9,744,001
1.24 %
1.50 %
$ 1,970,780
$ 1,189,493
8.19 %
18.74 %
$ 1,178,275
762,274
$
10.27 %
19.18 %
Note 1: A portion of the merger and conversion charges for both periods and the 2018 executive retirement benefits are nondeductible for tax purposes.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Ameris has established certain accounting and financial reporting policies to govern the application of accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in the preparation of its financial statements. Our significant
accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Certain accounting policies involve
significant judgments and assumptions by management which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and
liabilities; management considers these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions
used by management are based on historical experience and other factors which are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions made by management, actual results could differ from
the judgments and estimates adopted by management which could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and
liabilities and the results of our operations. We believe the following accounting policies applied by Ameris represent critical
accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We believe the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The allowance for loan losses represents
management’s estimate of probable incurred losses in the Company’s loan portfolio. Calculation of the allowance for loan
losses represents a critical accounting estimate due to the significant judgment, assumptions and estimates related to the amount
and timing of estimated losses, consideration of subjective environmental factors and the amount and timing of cash flows
related to impaired loans.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize
losses on loans, future additions to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In
addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review the Company’s
40
allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses
based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Considering current information and events regarding a borrower’s ability to repay its obligations, management considers a
loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectability of all amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement, is in doubt. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of impairment is measured based on the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or if the loan is collateral-dependent, the fair
value of the collateral is used to determine the amount of impairment. Impairment losses are included in the allowance for loan
losses through a charge to the provision for loan losses.
Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Cash receipts for accruing loans are applied to principal and
interest under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Cash receipts on impaired loans for which the accrual of interest has
been discontinued are applied first to principal and then to interest income.
Certain economic and interest rate factors could have a material impact on the determination of the allowance for loan
losses. An improving economy could result in the expansion of businesses and creation of jobs which would positively affect
our loan growth and improve our gross revenue stream. Conversely, certain factors could result from an expanding economy
which could increase our credit costs and adversely impact our net earnings. A significant rapid rise in interest rates could
create higher borrowing costs and shrinking corporate profits which could have a material impact on a borrower’s ability to
pay. We will continue to concentrate on maintaining a high quality loan portfolio through strict administration of our loan
policy.
Another factor that we have considered in the determination of the allowance for loan losses is loan concentrations to individual
borrowers or industries. Based on total committed exposure at December 31, 2019, we had nine individual loans/lines of credit
that exceeded our normal in-house credit limit of $40.0 million. Total exposure from these nine individual loans/lines of credit
amounted to $600.6 million as of December 31, 2019. The largest total committed exposure for a single loan/line of credit at
December 31, 2019 was $100.0 million, and we had one line of credit at this level extended to a client of our warehouse lending
division. As of December 31, 2019, we had 14 relationships consisting of 52 loans/lines of credit that exceeded $40.0 million.
Total exposure from these 14 relationships amounted to $874.0 million as of December 31, 2019. The largest total committed
exposure for a single relationship at December 31, 2019 was $100.0 million, and we had one relationship at this level which is a
client of our warehouse lending division as well. Additional disclosure concerning the Company’s largest loan relationships is
provided in the “Balance Sheet Comparison” section below.
A substantial portion of our loan portfolio is in the commercial real estate and residential real estate sectors. The majority of
these loans are secured by real estate in our primary market areas. A substantial portion of OREO is located in those same
markets. Therefore, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of our loan portfolio and the recoverability of a
substantial portion of the carrying amount of OREO are susceptible to changes to market conditions in our primary market area.
Business Combinations
Assets purchased and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at their fair value. The fair value of a loan
portfolio acquired in a business combination requires greater levels of management estimates and judgment than the remainder
of purchased assets or assumed liabilities. On the date of acquisition, when the loans have evidence of credit deterioration since
origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and
interest payments, the difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be
collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. The Company must estimate expected cash flows at each
reporting date. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent
increases in cash flows result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and adjusted accretable
yield which will have a positive impact on future interest income.
Income Taxes
As required by GAAP, we use the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provide deferred
income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. See Note 14, “Income Taxes,” in the notes to consolidated
financial statements for additional details.
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of
the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing
temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as the provision for loan losses and gains on FDIC-
41
assisted transactions, for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that
are included in our consolidated balance sheet.
We must also assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent
we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Significant management judgment is required in
determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against
our net deferred tax assets. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or adjust this allowance in a period, we must
include an expense within the tax provisions in the statement of income.
Long-Lived Assets, Including Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets purchased in business combinations. Goodwill is
required to be tested annually for impairment or whenever events occur that may indicate that the recoverability of the carrying
amount is not probable. In the event of an impairment, the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value is
charged to earnings. The Company performs its annual impairment testing of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year.
Intangible assets include core deposit premiums from various past bank acquisitions as well as intangible assets recorded in
connection with the USPF acquisition for insurance agent relationships, the "US Premium Finance" trade name and a non-
compete agreement.
Core deposit premiums acquired in various past bank acquisitions are based on the established value of acquired customer
deposits. The core deposit premium is initially recognized based on a valuation performed as of the acquisition date and is
amortized over an estimated useful life of seven to ten years.
The insurance agent relationships, the "US Premium Finance" trade name and non-compete agreement intangible assets
acquired in the USPF acquisition are based on the established values as of the acquisition date and are being amortized over
estimated useful lives of eight years, seven years and three years, respectively.
The valuation of intangible assets involves significant forward looking assumptions such as economic conditions, market
interest rates, asset growth rates, credit losses, etc. Changes in any of these assumptions could materially affect the valuation of
the intangible assets.
Amortization periods for intangible assets are reviewed annually in connection with the annual impairment testing of goodwill.
Servicing Assets
We sell residential mortgage and SBA loans with servicing retained. We have also assumed servicing of loans sold with
servicing retained, primarily indirect automobile loan pools, in prior acquisitions. When the contractual servicing fees on loans
sold with servicing retained are expected to be more than adequate compensation to a servicer for performing the servicing, a
capitalized servicing asset is recognized. Servicing assets are subsequently measured using the amortization method which
requires servicing rights to be amortized into non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future
net servicing income of the underlying loans. Management makes certain estimates and assumptions related to costs to service
varying types of loans and pools of loans, the projected lives of loans and pools of loans sold, and discount factors used in
calculating the present values of servicing fees projected to be received.
No less frequently than quarterly for mortgage servicing rights and semi-annually for all other servicing rights, management
reviews the status of all loans and pools of loans sold with related capitalized servicing assets to determine if there is any
impairment to those assets due to such factors as earlier than estimated repayments or significant prepayments. Any impairment
identified in these assets will result in reductions in their carrying values through a valuation allowance and a corresponding
increase in operating expenses.
NET INCOME AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company’s net income during 2019 was $161.4 million, or $2.75 per diluted share, compared with $121.0 million, or $2.80
per diluted share, in 2018, and $73.5 million, or $1.98 per diluted share, in 2017.
For the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company recorded net income of $61.2 million, or $0.88 per diluted share, compared with
$43.5 million, or $0.91 per diluted share, for the quarter ended December 31, 2018, and $9.2 million, or $0.24 per diluted share,
for the quarter ended December 31, 2017.
42
EARNING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Average earning assets were approximately $13.13 billion in 2019, compared with approximately $8.86 billion in 2018. The
earning asset and interest-bearing liability mix is regularly monitored to maximize the net interest margin and, therefore,
increase return on assets and shareholders’ equity.
The following statistical information should be read in conjunction with the remainder of “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Annual Report and in the documents incorporated herein by reference.
The following tables set forth the amount of average balance, interest income or interest expense, and average interest rate for
each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net interest margin on average
interest-earning assets. Federally tax-exempt income is presented on a taxable-equivalent basis assuming a 21% federal tax rate
for 2019 and 2018 and a 35% federal tax rate for 2017.
Year Ended December 31,
2019
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/
Rate Paid
Average
Balance
2018
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/
Rate Paid
Average
Balance
2017
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/
Rate Paid
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold, interest-
bearing deposits in banks and
time deposits in other banks
Investment securities
Loans held for sale
Loans
$ 393,733
$ 8,815
2.24 % $ 257,579
$ 5,211
2.02 % $ 140,703
$ 1,725
1.23 %
Total interest-earning assets
13,128,229
640,744
Noninterest-earning assets
Total assets
1,492,956
$14,621,185
1,400,440
667,078
40,889
25,003
10,666,978
566,037
2.92
3.75
5.31
4.88
1,036,822
140,273
30,145
5,709
7,426,531
376,349
8,861,205
417,414
2.91
4.07
5.07
4.71
861,189
113,657
22,586
4,222
5,643,960
272,775
6,759,509
301,308
2.62
3.71
4.83
4.46
882,796
$9,744,001
571,465
$7,330,974
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings and interest-
bearing demand deposits
$5,641,123
$ 53,048
0.94 % $4,032,178
$ 26,594
0.66 % $3,172,234
$ 11,759
Time deposits
2,696,533
49,485
1.84
1,666,639
22,460
1.35
1,002,697
8,118
Federal funds purchased and
securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
FHLB advances
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest
debentures
14,043
483,735
186,798
86
10,044
11,127
110,129
7,438
Total interest-bearing liabilities
9,132,361
131,228
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
3,364,785
Other liabilities
Shareholders' equity
153,259
1,970,780
Total liabilities and shareholders’
equity
$14,621,185
23
8,153
6,856
5,848
69,934
0.15
1.93
6.04
6.69
1.10
0.61
2.08
5.96
6.75
1.44
15,692
421,891
113,496
87,444
6,337,340
2,164,171
64,215
1,178,275
56
5,174
4,044
5,071
34,222
28,694
496,541
68,726
84,878
4,853,770
1,670,499
36,409
770,296
$9,744,001
$7,330,974
Interest rate spread
Net interest income
Net interest margin
$509,516
3.44 %
3.88 %
$347,480
3.61 %
3.92 %
$267,086
0.37 %
0.81
0.20
1.04
5.88
5.97
0.71
3.75 %
3.95 %
43
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on interest-earning assets exceeds interest expense incurred
on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is the largest component of our income and is affected by the interest rate
environment and the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-earning
assets include loans, investment securities, other investments, interest-bearing deposits in banks, federal funds sold and time
deposits in other banks. Our interest-bearing liabilities include deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, other
borrowings and subordinated deferrable interest debentures.
2019 compared with 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, interest income was $636.4 million, an increase of $223.1
million, or 54.0%, compared with the same period in 2018. Average earning assets increased $4.27 billion, or 48.2%, to $13.13
billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared with $8.86 billion for 2018. Yield on average earning assets on a
taxable equivalent basis increased during 2019 to 4.88%, compared with 4.71% for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Average yields on all interest-earning asset categories increased from 2018 to 2019 with the exception of loans held for sale,
which experienced a decrease from 4.07% in 2018 to 3.75% in 2019.
Interest expense on deposits and other borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $131.2 million, an increase of
$61.3 million, or 87.6%, compared with $69.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. During 2019 average interest-
bearing liabilities were $9.13 billion as compared with $6.34 billion for 2018, an increase of $2.80 billion, or 44.1%. During
2019, average noninterest-bearing deposit accounts averaged $3.36 billion and comprised 28.8% of average total deposits,
compared with $2.16 billion, or 27.5% of average total deposits, during 2018. Average balances of time deposits amounted to
$2.70 billion and comprised 23.0% of average total deposits during 2019, compared with $1.67 billion, or 21.2% of average
total deposits, during 2018.
On a taxable-equivalent basis, net interest income for 2019 was $509.5 million, compared with $347.5 million in 2018, an
increase of $162.0 million, or 46.6%. The Company’s net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased four basis points
to 3.88% for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared with 3.92% for the year ended December 31, 2018. Accretion
income for 2019 increased to $19.9 million, compared with $11.8 million for 2018.
2018 compared with 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2018, interest income was $413.3 million, an increase of $119.0
million, or 40.4%, compared with the same period in 2017. Average earning assets increased $2.10 billion, or 31.1%, to $8.86
billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared with $6.76 billion as of December 31, 2017. Yield on average earning
assets on a taxable equivalent basis increased during 2018 to 4.71%, compared with 4.46% for the year ended December 31,
2017. Average yields on all interest-earning asset categories increased from 2017 to 2018 with the exception of purchased
loans, which experienced a decrease from 5.96% in 2017 to 5.72% in 2018.
Interest expense on deposits and other borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $69.9 million, an increase of
$35.7 million, or 104.4%, compared with $34.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2018 average interest-
bearing liabilities were $6.34 billion as compared with $4.85 billion for 2017, an increase of $1.48 billion, or 30.6%. During
2018, average noninterest-bearing accounts amounted to $2.16 billion and comprised 27.5% of average total deposits,
compared with $1.67 billion, or 28.6% of average total deposits, during 2017. Average balances of time deposits amounted to
$1.67 billion and comprised 21.2% of average total deposits during 2018, compared with $1.00 billion, or 17.2% of average
total deposits, during 2017.
On a taxable-equivalent basis, net interest income for 2018 was $347.5 million, compared with $267.1 million in 2017, an
increase of $80.4 million, or 30.1%. The Company’s net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased three basis points
to 3.92% for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared with 3.95% for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accretion
income for 2018 increased to $11.8 million, compared with $10.6 million for 2017.
44
The summary of changes in interest income and interest expense on a fully taxable equivalent basis resulting from changes in
volume and changes in rates for each category of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018 are shown in the following table:
(dollars in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in:
Income from earning assets:
2019 vs. 2018
2018 vs. 2017
Increase
(Decrease)
Changes Due To
Increase
Changes Due To
Rate
Volume
(Decrease)
Rate
Volume
Interest on federal funds sold, interest-bearing
deposits in banks and time deposits in other banks
$
3,604
$
Interest on investment securities
Interest on loans held for sale
Interest and fees on loans
Total interest income
Expense from interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest on savings and interest-bearing demand
deposits
Interest on time deposits
Interest on federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
Interest on FHLB advances
Interest on other borrowings
Interest on trust preferred securities
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for Loan Losses
10,744
19,294
189,688
223,330
26,454
27,025
63
1,891
4,271
1,590
850
172
(2,147)
25,474
24,349
15,842
13,146
65
696
(157)
73
$
2,754
$
3,486
$
2,053
$
10,572
21,441
164,214
198,981
10,612
13,879
(2)
1,195
4,428
1,517
31,629
7,559
1,487
103,574
116,106
14,835
14,342
(33)
2,979
2,812
777
35,712
2,953
498
17,404
22,908
11,647
8,967
(8)
3,757
178
624
25,165
1,433
4,606
989
86,170
93,198
3,188
5,375
(25)
(778)
2,634
153
10,547
82,651
61,294
29,665
$
162,036
$
(5,316) $
167,352
$
80,394
$
(2,257) $
The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. The
provision for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the size and composition of the loan portfolio, the level of
non-performing and past due loans, historical trends of charged-off loans and recoveries, prevailing economic conditions and
other factors management deems appropriate. As these factors change, the level of loan loss provision may change.
The Company’s provision for loan losses during 2019 amounted to $19.8 million, compared with $16.7 million for 2018 and
$8.4 million for 2017. Net charge-offs in 2019 were 0.10% of average loans compared with 0.18% in 2018 and 0.12% in 2017.
Net charge-offs in 2019 were 0.15% of average legacy loans, compared with 0.27% in 2018 and 0.13% in 2017. Of the $14.5
million in legacy loan net charge-offs recorded during 2018, approximately $7.2 million, or 49.5%, were charge-offs within the
Premium Finance Division stemming from two purchased loan relationships. These two relationships were non-core general
operating lines to insurance agencies and were not the traditional premium finance offerings that the Company primarily
focuses on. Management notes that both agencies suffered unusual circumstances that precipitated their defaults. Excluding
these unusual charge-offs, total net charge-offs for 2018 would have been 0.09% of average total loans and legacy net charge-
offs in 2018 would have been 0.14% of average legacy loans. As of December 31, 2019, the remaining balance on those non-
core loans totaled $6.8 million.
At December 31, 2019, non-performing assets amounted to $101.3 million, or 0.56% of total assets, compared with $63.0
million, or 0.55% of total assets, at December 31, 2018. Legacy non-performing assets totaled $39.5 million and $29.4 million
at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Legacy other real estate was approximately $4.5 million as of December 31,
2019, reflecting a 37.7% decrease from the $7.2 million reported at December 31, 2018. Purchased other real estate was $15.0
million at December 31, 2019, reflecting a 57.3% increase from the $9.5 million at December 31, 2018.
45
The Company’s allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2019 was $38.2 million, or 0.30% of loans compared with $28.8
million, or 0.34%, and $25.8 million, or 0.43%, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Excluding purchased loans and
purchased loan pools, the Company’s allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2019 was $34.3 million, or 0.46% of loans,
compared with $26.2 million, or 0.46%, and $21.5 million, or 0.44%, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The
Company experienced growth in all non-purchased loan segments in 2019 except consumer installment loans which decreased
slightly. The allowance as a percentage of loans, excluding purchased loans and purchased loan pools, at December 31, 2019
remained stable compared with December 31, 2018, as increases in the loss rate on commercial, financial and agricultural loans
and qualitative factors on residential real estate loans offset improvements in either qualitative factors or loss rates on other
portfolios. A significant portion of the Company’s loan growth during 2019 consisted of commercial real estate, residential
mortgage loans and funded balances on residential mortgage warehouse lines of credit, each of which the Company has
experienced low rates of loss.
Noninterest Income
Following is a comparison of noninterest income for 2019, 2018 and 2017.
(dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts
Mortgage banking activities
Other service charges, commissions and fees
Net gain (loss) on securities
Gain on sale of SBA loans
Other noninterest income
Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
50,792
$
46,128
$
119,409
3,913
138
6,058
17,803
53,654
3,059
(37)
2,728
12,880
42,054
48,535
2,883
37
4,590
6,358
$
198,113
$
118,412
$
104,457
2019 compared with 2018. Total noninterest income in 2019 was $198.1 million, compared with $118.4 million in 2018,
reflecting an increase of 67.3%, or $79.7 million.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $4.7 million, or 10.1%, to $50.8 million during 2019 compared with 2018.
This increase was primarily attributable to the Fidelity acquisition which closed on July 1, 2019 and the full year impact of the
Atlantic and Hamilton acquisitions which both closed during the second quarter of 2018. Maintenance service charges on
deposits and non-sufficient funds/overdraft charges both increased during 2019 while interchange income decreased slightly
due to the impact of the Durbin Amendment beginning in the third quarter of 2019.
Other service charges, commission and fees increased by $854,000 to $3.9 million during 2019, an increase of 27.9% compared
with 2018 due primarily to an increase in ATM fees.
Income from mortgage banking activities increased $65.8 million, or 122.6%, to $119.4 million during 2019 compared with
2018. This increase was a result of both the Fidelity acquisition and additional growth from the low interest rate environment
during the second half of 2019. Total production in the retail mortgage division increased to $4.3 billion for 2019, compared
with $1.8 billion for 2018, while gain on sale spreads decreased in 2019 to 2.75% from 2.92% in 2018. The decrease in gain on
sale spread is primarily related to a shift in product mix and transition of the Fidelity pricing model through conversion.
Noninterest income from the Company's warehouse lending division was approximately flat at $2.0 million for 2019 compared
with 2018.
Gain on sale of SBA loans increased by $3.3 million, or 122.1%, to $6.1 million during 2019 compared with 2018, reflecting an
118.1% increase in SBA loans sold during 2019 compared with 2018.
Other noninterest income increased by $4.9 million, or 38.2%, to $17.8 million during 2019 compared with 2018. This increase
was primarily due to a $2.5 million increase in loan servicing income and a $3.6 million gain on BOLI proceeds due to the
unfortunate death of a former officer of Fidelity. Additionally, check order fees, merchant fee income, trust services activities
income and income from bank owned life insurance were higher in 2019. These increases were partially offset by $4.5 million
in other income recorded during 2018 to reflect a decrease in the USPF acquisition contingent consideration expected to be
paid.
46
2018 compared with 2017. Total noninterest income in 2018 was $118.4 million, compared with $104.5 million in 2017,
reflecting an increase of 13.4%, or $14.0 million.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $4.1 million, or 9.7%, to $46.1 million during 2018 compared with 2017.
This increase was primarily attributable to the Atlantic and Hamilton acquisitions which both closed during the second quarter
of 2018. All areas of service charges on deposits increased during 2018 including maintenance service charges on deposits,
interchange income, and non-sufficient funds/overdraft charges.
Other service charges, commission and fees increased by $176,000 to $3.1 million during 2018, an increase of 6.1% compared
with 2017 due to an increase in ATM fees.
Income from mortgage banking activities increased $5.1 million, or 10.5%, to $53.7 million during 2018 compared with 2017.
Retail mortgage revenues increased $11.2 million, or 18.5%, during 2018, from $60.5 million for 2017 to $71.7 million for
2018. Net income for the Company’s retail mortgage division grew 35.9% during 2018 to $16.5 million. Revenues from the
Company’s warehouse lending division increased $3.5 million, or 45.9%, during the year, from $7.6 million for 2017 to $11.1
million for 2018. Net income for the warehouse lending division increased $3.7 million, or 86.8%, during 2018, from $4.3
million for 2017 to $8.1 million for 2018.
Gain on sale of SBA loans decreased by $1.9 million, or 40.6%, to $2.7 million during 2018 compared with 2017, reflecting a
33.2% reduction in SBA loans sold during 2018 compared with 2017.
Other noninterest income increased by $6.5 million, or 102.6%, to $12.8 million during 2018 compared with 2017. This
increase was primarily due to $4.5 million in other income recorded to reflect a decrease in the USPF acquisition contingent
consideration expected to be paid. Additionally, loan servicing fee income, check order fees, merchant fee income, and income
from bank owned life insurance were higher in 2018.
Noninterest Expense
Following is a comparison of noninterest expense for 2019, 2018 and 2017.
(dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Advertising and marketing
Amortization of intangible assets
Data processing and communications expenses
Legal and other professional fees
Credit resolution-related expenses
Merger and conversion charges
FDIC insurance
Other noninterest expenses
Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
223,938
$
149,132
$
119,783
40,596
7,927
17,713
38,513
10,634
4,082
73,105
1,945
53,484
29,131
5,571
9,512
30,385
6,386
4,016
20,499
3,408
35,607
24,069
5,131
3,932
27,869
15,355
3,493
915
3,078
28,311
$
471,937
$
293,647
$
231,936
2019 compared with 2018. Total noninterest expense increased $178.3 million, or 60.7%, in 2019 to $471.9 million from
$293.6 million in 2018. Total noninterest expense for 2019 include approximately $73.1 million in merger-related charges,
$6.0 million in losses on sale of bank premises, $245,000 in restructuring charges, ($39,000) in financial impact of hurricanes
charges, and $463,000 in expenses related to the previously announced SEC and DOJ investigation. Total noninterest expense
for 2018 includes approximately $20.5 million in merger-related charges, $8.4 million in executive retirement benefits,
$983,000 in restructuring charges, $882,000 in financial impact of hurricanes and $1.0 million in losses on sale of bank
premises. Excluding these amounts, expenses in 2019 increased by $130.3 million, or 49.8%, compared with 2018 levels.
Salaries and benefits increased $74.8 million, or 50.2%, from $149.1 million in 2018 to $223.9 million in 2019. This increase
was primarily attributable to staff additions resulting from the Fidelity acquisition which closed at the beginning of the third
quarter of 2019 and an increase in variable pay resulting from increased production levels in our retail mortgage division. Full
time equivalent employees increased from 1,804 at December 31, 2018 to 2,722 at December 31, 2019.
47
Occupancy costs increased $11.5 million, or 39.4%, from $29.1 million in 2018 to $40.6 million in 2019 due primarily to 62
branch locations being added during 2019 as a result of the Fidelity acquisition, partially offset by branch closures related to
previously announced branch consolidations.
Amortization of intangible assets increased $8.2 million, or 86.2%, to $17.7 million for 2019 compared with $9.5 million for
2018 due to additional amortization of intangible assets recorded as part of the USPF, Atlantic, Hamilton and Fidelity
acquisitions.
Data processing and telecommunications expenses increased $8.1 million, or 26.8%, to $38.5 million for 2019 compared with
$30.4 million for 2018. This increase reflects increased core banking system charges due to an increase in the number of
accounts being processed by our core banking system as a result of the Atlantic, Hamilton and Fidelity acquisitions and a $1.4
million refund recorded in the second quarter of 2018 related to overcharges on prior billings from a data processing vendor.
Other professional fees increased $4.2 million, or 66.5%, from $6.4 million in 2018 to $10.6 million in 2019, primarily due to
consulting fees related to implementation of a new support system and an increase in mortgage consulting related to increases in
production volume.
Merger and conversion charges were $73.1 million in 2019, an increase of $52.6 million, or 256.6%, compared with $20.5
million recorded for 2018. Merger and conversion charges in 2019 primarily related to the acquisition of Fidelity while those in
2018 were primarily related to the acquisitions of USPF, Atlantic and Hamilton during 2018, as well as the conversion of both
Atlantic and Hamilton to our core system during 2018.
Other noninterest expense increased $17.9 million, or 50.2%, to $53.5 million in 2019 from $35.6 million in 2018, resulting
primarily from increases in loss on sale of bank premises, ATM expenses, loan servicing expense, and deposit account charge-
offs, partially offset by a decrease in hurricane related expenses and debit card charge-offs. Also contributing to the increase
was an increase in variable expenses related to our elevated mortgage production.
2018 compared with 2017. Total noninterest expense increased $61.7 million, or 26.6%, in 2018 to $293.6 million from
$231.9 million in 2017. Total noninterest expense for 2018 include approximately $20.5 million in merger-related charges,
$8.4 million in executive retirement benefits expense, $983,000 in restructuring charges, $882,000 in Hurricane Michael
charges, $1.0 million in losses on sale of bank premises. Total noninterest expense for 2017 includes approximately $915,000
in merger-related charges, $5.2 million in compliance-related charges, $410,000 in Hurricane Irma charges and $1.3 million in
losses on sale of bank premises. Excluding these amounts, expenses in 2018 increased by $37.6 million, or 16.8%, compared
with 2017 levels.
Salaries and benefits increased $29.3 million, or 24.5%, from $119.8 million in 2017 to $149.1 million in 2018. This increase
was attributable to $8.4 million in expense related to executive retirement benefits coupled with higher incentive pay, increased
share-based compensation expense and increased investment in the Company's BSA function, as well as staff additions
resulting from the Atlantic acquisition and the Hamilton acquisition both of which closed during the second quarter of 2018.
Full time equivalent employees increased from 1,460 at December 31, 2017 to 1,804 at December 31, 2018.
Occupancy costs increased $5.1 million, or 21.03%, from $24.1 million in 2017 to $29.1 million in 2018 due primarily to 28
branch locations being added during 2018 as a result of the Atlantic and Hamilton acquisitions.
Amortization of intangible assets increased $5.6 million, or 141.9%, to $9.5 million for 2018 compared with $3.9 million for
2017 due to additional amortization of intangible assets recorded as part of the USPF, Atlantic and Hamilton acquisitions.
Data processing and telecommunications expenses increased $2.5 million, or 9.0%, to $30.4 million for 2018 compared with
$27.9 million for 2018. This increase reflects increased core banking system charges due to an increase in the number of
accounts being processed by our core banking system as a result of the Atlantic and Hamilton acquisitions and additional
software fees related to the buildout of our BSA compliance program, partially offset by a $1.4 million refund recorded in the
second quarter of 2018 related to overcharges on prior billings from a data processing vendor.
Other professional fees decreased $9.5 million, or 67.4%, from $14.1 million in 2017 to $4.6 million in 2018, primarily due to a
$5.5 million reduction in fees incurred in the premium finance division pursuant to the USPF management and license
agreement which were discontinued after completion of the USPF acquisition on January 31, 2018 coupled with a $5.2 million
reduction in consulting fees related to our BSA compliance function.
48
Merger and conversion charges of $20.5 million in 2018 reflect an increase of $19.6 million, compared with $915,000 recorded
in 2017. Merger and conversion charges were elevated in 2018 due to the acquisitions of USPF, Atlantic and Hamilton during
2018, as well as the conversion of both Atlantic and Hamilton to our core system during 2018.
Other noninterest expense increased $7.3 million, or 25.8%, to $35.6 million in 2018 from $28.3 million in 2017, resulting
primarily from increases in loan servicing expense, debit card charge-offs, natural disaster expenses related to Hurricane
Michael, and servicing asset amortization expense, partially offset by a decrease in loan expense.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is influenced by statutory federal and state tax rates, the amount of taxable income, the amount of tax-
exempt income and the amount of non-deductible expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded
income tax expense of approximately $50.1 million, compared with $30.5 million recorded in 2018 and $50.7 million recorded
in 2017. The Company’s effective tax rate was 23.7%, 20.1% and 40.8% for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017, respectively.
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes a charge of approximately $13.6
million to income tax expense attributable to the remeasurement of the Company's deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities
due to federal tax legislation that reduced the Company's future federal corporate tax rate. Excluding this remeasurement
charge, income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 would have been $37.1 million and the Company's effective
tax rate would have been approximately 29.9%.
49
BALANCE SHEET COMPARISON
LOANS
Management believes that our loan portfolio is adequately diversified. The loan portfolio contains no foreign loans or
significant concentrations in any one industry. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 72.1% of our legacy loan portfolio was
secured by real estate, compared with 68.7% at December 31, 2018 and 65.2% at December 31, 2017.
The amount of loans outstanding, excluding purchased loans, at the indicated dates is shown in the following table according to
type of loans.
(dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Commercial, financial and agricultural
$ 1,646,438
$ 1,316,359
$ 1,362,508
$
967,138
$
449,623
Real estate – construction and development
1,083,564
671,198
624,595
363,045
244,693
Real estate – commercial and farmland
2,447,834
1,814,529
1,535,439
1,406,219
1,104,991
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
1,901,352
1,403,000
1,009,461
450,799
455,371
324,511
781,018
109,401
570,430
37,140
Loans, net of unearned income
$ 7,529,987
$ 5,660,457
$ 4,856,514
$ 3,626,821
$ 2,406,877
The following table summarizes the various loan types comprising the "Commercial, financial and agricultural" loan category
displayed in the preceding table.
(dollars in thousands)
Municipal loans
Premium finance loans
Other commercial, financial and agricultural loans
2019
2018
December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
486,178
$
510,600
$
522,880
$
385,697
$
239,151
654,669
505,591
410,381
395,378
482,536
357,092
353,858
227,583
—
210,472
$ 1,646,438
$ 1,316,359
$ 1,362,508
$
967,138
$
449,623
The Company seeks to diversify its loan portfolio across its geographic footprint and in various loan types. Also, the
Company’s in-house lending limit for a single loan is $40.0 million, which would normally prevent a concentration with a
single loan project. Certain lending relationships may contain more than one loan and, consequently, exceed the in-house
lending limit. The Company regularly monitors its largest loan relationships to avoid a concentration with a single borrower.
The largest 25 loan relationships as of December 31, 2019 based on committed amount are summarized below by type.
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural
$
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Mortgage warehouse and mortgage servicing
rights lines of credit
Total
Committed
Amount
Average
Rate
Average
Maturity
(months)
138
%
Unsecured
7.28 %
36
36
24
3
37
—
—
—
—
0.71 %
% in
Nonaccrual
Status
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
2.70 %
4.75 %
4.29 %
5.25 %
4.33 %
4.19 %
126,109
467,363
141,331
10,000
544,589
$
1,289,392
50
Total legacy loans, excluding purchased loans, as of December 31, 2019, are shown in the following table according to their
contractual maturity.
(dollars in thousands)
Contractual Maturity in:
One Year
or Less
Over
One Year
through
Five Years
Over
Five Years
Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural
$
728,795
$
383,691
$
533,952
$
1,646,438
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Purchased Assets
343,980
243,844
585,333
2,230
492,361
1,124,192
158,122
123,982
247,223
1,079,798
1,157,897
324,587
1,083,564
2,447,834
1,901,352
450,799
$
1,904,182
$
2,282,348
$
3,343,457
$
7,529,987
Purchased loans are defined as loans that are acquired in bank acquisitions including those acquisitions covered by the loss-
sharing agreements with the FDIC. Purchased loans totaled $5.08 billion and $2.59 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. Purchased OREO is defined as OREO that was acquired in bank acquisitions including those acquisitions covered
by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC. Purchased OREO totaled $15.0 million and $9.5 million at December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively.
The Bank initially records purchased loans at fair value, taking into consideration certain credit quality risk and interest rate
risk. The Company believes its estimation of credit risk and its adjustments to the carrying balances of the acquired loans is
adequate. If the Company determines that a loan or group of loans has deteriorated from its initial assessment of fair value,
additional provision for loan loss expense will be recorded for the impairment in value. If the Company determines that a loan
or group of loans has improved from its initial assessment of fair value, then the increase in cash flows over those expected at
the acquisition date will result in a reversal of provision for loan loss expense to the extent of prior provisions or will be
recognized as interest income prospectively if no provisions have been made or have been fully reversed.
The amount of purchased loans outstanding, at the indicated dates, is shown in the following table according to type of loan.
(dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Commercial, financial and agricultural
$
384,273
$
372,686
$
74,378
$
96,537
$
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
465,497
1,905,205
1,220,271
1,100,035
227,900
1,337,859
623,199
27,188
65,513
468,246
250,539
2,919
81,368
576,355
310,277
4,654
51,008
79,692
461,981
311,191
5,211
Total purchased non-covered loans
$ 5,075,281
$ 2,588,832
$
861,595
$ 1,069,191
$
909,083
Purchased loans as of December 31, 2019, are shown below according to their contractual maturity.
(dollars in thousands)
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Total purchased loans
Contractual Maturity in:
Over
One Year
through
Five Years
Over
Five Years
One Year
or Less
$
$
702,900
—
702,900
$
$
2,163,165
23,772
2,186,937
$
$
2,209,216
189,436
2,398,652
$
$
Total
5,075,281
213,208
5,288,489
51
Total loans (legacy loans, purchased loans and purchased loan pools) which have maturity dates after one year are summarized
below by those loans that have predetermined interest rates and those loans that have floating or adjustable interest rates.
(dollars in thousands)
Predetermined interest rates
Floating or adjustable interest rates
Purchased Loan Pools
$
December 31,
2019
6,939,752
3,271,642
$ 10,211,394
Purchased loan pools are defined as groups of residential mortgage loans that were not acquired in bank acquisitions or FDIC-
assisted transactions. As of December 31, 2019, purchased loan pools totaled $213.2 million and consisted of whole-loan,
adjustable rate residential mortgages on properties outside the Company’s markets, with principal balances totaling $212.4
million and $811,000 of remaining purchase premium paid at acquisition. As of December 31, 2018, purchased loan pools
totaled $262.6 million with principal balances totaling $260.5 million and $2.1 million of remaining purchase premium paid at
acquisition. As of December 31, 2017, purchased loan pools totaled $328.2 million with principal balances totaling $324.4
million and $3.8 million of remaining purchase premium paid at acquisition. As of December 31, 2016, purchased loan pools
totaled $568.3 million with principal balances totaling $559.4 million and $8.9 million of remaining purchase premium paid at
acquisition. As of December 31, 2015, purchased loan pools totaled $593.0 million with principal balances totaling $580.7
million and $12.3 million of remaining purchase premium paid at acquisition. At December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and
2015 the Company has allocated approximately $624,000, $732,000, $1.1 million, $1.8 million and $581,000, respectively, of
the allowance for loan losses to the purchased loan pools.
Assets Covered by Loss-Sharing Agreements with the FDIC
Included in purchased loans above are loans that were acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by the loss-
sharing agreements with the FDIC (“covered loans”) totaling $30.3 million and $38.1 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018,
is covered by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC totaled $36,000 and $424,000 at
respectively. OREO that
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The loss-sharing agreements are subject to the servicing procedures as specified in
the agreements with the FDIC. The expected reimbursements under the loss-sharing agreements were recorded as an
indemnification asset at their estimated fair value at the respective acquisition dates. The net FDIC loss-share payable reported
at December 31, 2019 was $19.6 million which includes the clawback liability of $20.4 million the Bank expects to pay to the
FDIC. The net FDIC loss-share payable reported at December 31, 2018 was $19.5 million which includes the clawback liability
of $19.5 million the Bank expects to pay to the FDIC.
Covered loans are shown below according to loan type as of the end of the years shown (in thousands).
(dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Commercial, financial and agricultural
$
15
$
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total covered loans
140
28
29,937
204
$
577
730
74
36,618
97
140
195
107
29,604
107
$
794
$
2,992
12,917
41,389
68
5,546
7,612
71,226
53,038
107
$
30,324
$
38,096
$
30,153
$
58,160
$
137,529
ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on non-
accruing, past due and other loans that management believes might be potentially impaired or warrant additional attention. We
segregate our loan portfolio by type of loan and utilize this segregation in evaluating exposure to risks within the portfolio. In
addition, based on internal reviews and external reviews performed by independent loan reviewers and regulatory authorities,
we further segregate our loan portfolio by loan grades based on an assessment of risk for a particular loan or group of loans.
Certain reviewed loans are assigned specific allowances when a review of relevant data determines that a general allocation is
not sufficient or when the review affords management the opportunity to fine tune the amount of exposure in a given credit. In
52
establishing allowances, management considers historical loan loss experience but adjusts this data with a significant emphasis
on data such as current loan quality trends, current economic conditions and other factors in the markets where the Bank
operates. Factors considered include, among others, current valuations of real estate in our markets, unemployment rates, the
effect of weather conditions on agricultural related entities and other significant local economic events, such as major plant
closings.
We have developed a methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses which is monitored by the
Company’s Chief Credit Officer. Procedures provide for the assignment of a risk rating for every loan included in the total loan
portfolio. Commercial insurance premium loans, overdraft protection loans and certain mortgage loans and consumer loans
serviced by outside processors are treated as pools for risk rating purposes. The risk rating schedule provides nine ratings of
which five ratings are classified as pass ratings and four ratings are classified as criticized ratings. Each risk rating is assigned a
percent factor to be applied to the loan balance to determine the adequate amount of allowance. Relationships in excess of $2.0
million require an annual review and are generally performed by someone independent of the loan officer. Those reviews are
approved by Regional Credit Officers and are often reviewed by independent third parties, such as auditors, regulators or loan
review. As a result of these loan reviews, certain loans may be assigned specific allowance allocations. Other loans that surface
as problem loans may also be assigned specific allowance allocations. Assigned risk ratings can be adjusted based on the
number of days past due. The calculation of the allowance for loan losses, including underlying data and assumptions, is
reviewed regularly by the independent internal loan review department.
Generally, the primary contributor to the allowance for loan losses methodology is historical losses by loan type. The
Company’s look-back period for historical losses is 16 quarters. Current period losses are lower than those incurred four years
ago, which has reduced the need in the allowance for loan losses, as a percentage of loans, at December 31, 2019, as compared
with prior periods. The Company’s qualitative factors currently utilized in determining the allowance for loan losses are
generally lower than those at December 31, 2018, with limited increases in certain segments primarily driven by portfolio
growth rates. Additionally, a significant portion of the Company's loan growth during 2019 consisted of residential mortgage
loans, funded balances on residential mortgage warehouse lines of credit and commercial real estate loans, each of which the
Company has experienced low levels of loss. The growth in lower-risk loans during 2019, combined with the improved
historical loss rates and qualitative factors on certain portfolios, are the primary reasons the allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of loans, excluding purchased loans and purchased loan pools, remained stable at 0.46% at December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2019.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category for the periods indicated.
Management believes the allowance can be allocated only on an approximate basis. The allocation of the allowance to each
category is not necessarily indicative of future losses and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any other
category.
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
Real estate construction & development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Total Commercial
Real estate - residential
Consumer installment and Other
Total excluding purchased loans and
purchased loan pools
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Total
December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Amount
$ 6,927
5,859
9,104
21,890
8,606
3,784
34,280
3,285
624
% of
Total
Amount
% of
Total
Amount
% of
Total
Amount
% of
Total
Amount
% of
Total
18 % $ 4,287
15 % $ 3,631
14 % $ 2,192
9 % $ 1,144
5 %
15
24
57
23
10
90
9
2
3,734
8,975
16,996
5,363
3,795
26,154
1,933
732
13
31
59
19
13
91
7
3
3,629
7,501
14,761
4,786
1,916
21,463
3,253
1,075
14
29
57
19
7
83
13
4
2,990
7,662
12,844
6,786
827
20,457
1,626
1,837
13
32
54
28
3
86
7
8
5,009
7,994
14,147
4,760
1,574
20,481
—
581
24
38
67
23
7
97
—
3
$ 38,189
100 % $ 28,819
100 % $ 25,791
100 % $ 23,920
100 % $ 21,062
100 %
53
The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses, provision for loan losses and net charge-offs for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
(dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
December 31,
Balance of allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
28,819
$
25,791
$
23,920
$
21,062
$
Provision charged to operating expense
19,758
16,667
8,364
4,091
Charge-offs:
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate - residential
Consumer installment
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate - residential
Consumer installment
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Total recoveries
Net charge-offs
7,131
321
1,430
160
5,695
5,051
—
19,788
13,803
292
338
771
4,189
1,738
—
21,131
2,850
95
853
2,151
1,618
2,900
—
10,467
3,072
3,769
1,270
25
113
295
910
4,985
—
9,400
10,388
120
176
346
499
2,582
—
7,492
13,639
246
184
237
116
1,921
—
3,974
6,493
1,999
588
708
1,122
351
1,559
—
6,327
400
490
269
391
127
3,417
—
5,094
1,233
21,157
5,264
1,438
622
2,367
1,587
410
2,709
—
9,133
651
323
317
151
137
2,195
—
3,774
5,359
Balance of allowance for loan losses at end of period
$
38,189
$
28,819
$
25,791
$
23,920
$
21,062
54
The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses and net charge-offs for legacy loans, purchased loans,
purchased loan pools and total loans held for investment.
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2019
Legacy
Loans
Purchased
Loans
Purchased
Loan
Pools
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
Net charge-offs (recoveries) for the period
$
34,280
$
3,285
$
624
$
10,322
66
—
Total
38,189
10,388
Loan balances:
End of period
Average for the period
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of end of period loans
7,529,987
6,865,526
5,075,281
3,562,229
213,208
12,818,476
239,223
10,666,978
0.15 %
0.46 %
0.00 %
0.06 %
0.00 %
0.29 %
0.10 %
0.30 %
December 31, 2018
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
Net charge-offs (recoveries) for the period
Loan balances:
End of period
Average for the period
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of end of period loans
December 31, 2017
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
Net charge-offs (recoveries) for the period
Loan balances:
End of period
Average for the period
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of end of period loans
December 31, 2016
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
Net charge-offs (recoveries) for the period
Loan balances:
End of period
Average for the period
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of end of period loans
December 31, 2015
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
Net charge-offs (recoveries) for the period
Loan balances:
End of period
Average for the period
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of end of period loans
55
$
26,154
$
1,933
$
732
$
14,483
(844)
—
28,819
13,639
5,660,457
5,415,757
0.27 %
0.46 %
2,588,832
1,712,924
(0.05)%
0.07 %
262,625
297,850
0.00 %
0.28 %
8,511,914
7,426,531
0.18 %
0.34 %
$
21,463
$
3,253
$
1,075
$
25,791
5,514
979
—
6,493
4,856,514
4,188,378
0.13 %
0.44 %
861,595
958,738
0.10 %
0.38 %
328,246
496,844
0.00 %
0.33 %
6,046,355
5,643,960
0.12 %
0.43 %
$
20,457
$
1,626
$
1,837
$
23,920
3,091
(1,858)
—
1,233
3,626,821
2,777,505
0.11 %
0.56 %
1,069,191
1,127,765
(0.16)%
0.15 %
568,314
619,440
0.00 %
0.32 %
5,264,326
4,524,710
0.03 %
0.45 %
$
20,481
$
— $
581
$
21,062
4,845
514
—
5,359
2,406,877
2,161,726
0.22 %
0.85 %
909,083
918,796
0.06 %
0.00 %
592,963
201,689
0.00 %
0.10 %
3,908,923
3,282,211
0.16 %
0.54 %
At December 31, 2019, the allowance for loan losses allocated to legacy loans totaled $34.3 million, or 0.46% of legacy loans,
compared with $26.2 million, or 0.46% of legacy loans, at December 31, 2018. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses as
a percentage of legacy loans over the past several years reflects the change in credit risk of our portfolio, both from the mix of
loan and collateral types, as well as the overall improvement in credit quality of the loan portfolio. Our legacy nonaccrual loans
increased from $18.0 million at December 31, 2018 to $29.3 million at December 31, 2019. Legacy nonaccrual loans as a
percentage of legacy loans increased from 0.32% at December 31, 2018 to 0.39% at December 31, 2019. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, our legacy net charge off ratio as a percentage of average legacy loans decreased to 0.15%, compared with
0.27% for the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded legacy net
charge-offs totaling $10.3 million, compared with $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased to $19.8 million, compared with $16.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019 our ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets had increased
slightly to 0.56% from 0.55% at December 31, 2018.
The balance of the allowance for loan losses allocated to loans collectively evaluated for impairment increased 30.1%, or $7.2
million, during the year ended December 31, 2019, while the balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment increased
50.6%, or $4.23 billion, during the same period, reflecting the acquisition of Fidelity and organic loan growth. For legacy
loans, increases in the loss rate on commercial, financial and agricultural loans and qualitative factors on residential real estate
loans offset improvements in either qualitative factors or loss rates on other portfolios. A significant portion of the legacy loan
growth during 2019 was concentrated in commercial real estate, residential mortgage loans and funded balances on residential
mortgage warehouse lines of credit, each of which the Company has experienced low rates of loss on. We consider a four year
loss rate on all loan categories and our charge off ratio has been steadily declining over that period. We have adjusted the
qualitative factors to account for the inherent risks in the portfolio that are not captured in the historical loss rates, such as
commodity prices for agriculture products, growth rates of certain loan types and other factors management deems appropriate.
As a percentage of all loans collectively evaluated for impairment, the allowance allocated to those loans decreased three basis
points, from 0.28% at December 31, 2018 to 0.25% at December 31, 2019. The largest increase in allowance allocated to loans
collectively evaluated for impairment as a percentage of the related loans was noted in legacy residential real estate and
commercial, financial, and agricultural loan categories. The allowance allocated to residential real estate loans evaluated
collectively for impairment increased from 0.32% at December 31, 2018 to 0.36% at December 31, 2019 reflecting the elevated
growth rate for this loan category. The allowance allocated to commercial, financial and agricultural
loans evaluated
collectively for impairment increased from 0.28% at December 31, 2018 to 0.32% at December 31, 2019 due to an increase in
historical net chargeoffs for this loan category.
The balance of the allowance for loan losses allocated to loans individually evaluated for impairment increased 44.3%, or $2.2
million, during the year ended December 31, 2019, while the balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment increased
53.0%, or $28.6 million during the same period. The increase in the allowance for loan losses allocated to loans individually
evaluated for impairment was primarily attributable to purchased loans. The increase in the balance of loans individually
evaluated for impairment was primarily attributable to purchased loans and a small number of residential real estate and
commercial, financial and agricultural loans.
NONPERFORMING LOANS
A loan is placed on non-accrual status when, in management’s judgment, the collection of the interest income appears doubtful.
Interest receivable that has been accrued in prior years and is subsequently determined to have doubtful collectability is charged
to the allowance for loan losses. Interest on loans that are classified as non-accrual is recognized when received. Past due loans
are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more unless the loan is well secured and in the
process of collection. In some cases, where borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties, loans may be restructured to
provide terms significantly different from the original contractual terms. The following table presents an analysis of loans
accounted for on a non-accrual basis and loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments and
still accruing, excluding purchased loans.
56
(dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
December 31,
Non-accrual loans, excluding purchased loans
Commercial, financial and agricultural
$
3,914
$
1,412
$
1,306
$
1,814
$
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Loans contractually past due 90 days or more
as to interest or principal payments and still
accruing, excluding purchased loans
$
$
1,145
4,232
19,557
443
892
4,654
10,465
529
554
2,665
9,194
483
547
8,757
6,401
595
29,291
$
17,952
$
14,202
$
18,114
$
16,860
5,733
$
4,222
$
5,991
$
— $
1
The following table presents an analysis of purchased loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis and loans contractually past
due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments and still accruing.
(dollars in thousands)
Purchased non-accrual loans
2019
2018
December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Commercial, financial & agricultural
$
5,933
$
1,199
$
813
$
692
$
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Purchased loans contractually past due 90 days
or more as to interest or principal payments
and still accruing
$
$
Troubled Debt Restructurings
842
19,565
16,560
2,123
6,119
5,534
10,769
486
3,139
5,685
5,743
48
2,611
10,174
9,476
13
45,023
$
24,107
$
15,428
$
22,966
$
26,568
21
$
— $
— $
— $
—
1,302
1,812
7,019
6,278
449
3,867
2,807
9,954
9,831
109
The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if both (i) the borrower is experiencing financial
difficulties and (ii) the Company has granted a concession.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had a balance of $14.1 million and $11.1 million, respectively, in troubled
debt restructurings, excluding purchased loans. The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan
class, excluding purchased loans, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Accruing Loans
Loan class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
5
2
12
83
4
106
Balance
(in thousands)
642
$
64
2,740
8,192
8
11,646
$
57
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
312
$
1
359
1,751
59
2,482
#
14
1
2
21
21
59
$
As of December 31, 2018
Accruing Loans
Loan class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
5
5
12
71
6
99
Balance
(in thousands)
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
$
$
256
145
2,863
6,043
16
9,323
14
1
3
20
24
62
$
$
138
2
426
1,119
69
1,754
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class, excluding purchased loans, classified
separately as those currently paying under restructured terms and those that have defaulted (defined as 30 days past due) under
restructured terms at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Loan class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Loan class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Loans Currently
Paying Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
Loans that have
Defaulted Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
9
1
3
24
11
48
$
$
115
2
1,034
1,959
40
3,150
$
10
2
11
80
14
839
63
2,064
7,985
27
117
$
10,978
Loans Currently
Paying Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
Loans that have
Defaulted Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
$
10
5
14
65
18
112
$
282
147
3,043
5,756
36
9,264
9
1
1
26
12
49
$
$
112
—
246
1,406
49
1,813
58
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings, excluding purchased loans, by types of concessions
made, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Type of Concession
Forgiveness of interest
Forbearance of interest
Forgiveness of principal
Forbearance of principal
Rate reduction only
Rate reduction, maturity extension
Rate reduction, forbearance of interest
Rate reduction, forbearance of principal
Rate reduction, forgiveness of interest
Rate reduction, forgiveness of principal
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Type of Concession
Forgiveness of interest
Forbearance of interest
Forgiveness of principal
Forbearance of principal
Rate reduction only
Rate reduction, maturity extension
Rate reduction, forbearance of interest
Rate reduction, forbearance of principal
Rate reduction, forgiveness of interest
Rate reduction, forgiveness of principal
Total
—
715
666
44
88
15
522
120
311
1
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
—
$
Accruing Loans
#
—
11
—
19
10
—
24
13
29
—
Balance
(in thousands)
$
—
1,429
—
3,725
887
—
1,986
1,554
2,065
—
106
$
11,646
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
5
1
4
2
2
11
27
6
1
59
$
2,482
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
$
$
—
1,361
686
360
1,155
—
2,149
1,384
2,228
—
9,323
1
5
—
4
1
3
13
29
5
1
62
$
55
509
—
75
56
25
618
150
264
2
$
1,754
#
—
9
1
6
11
—
27
15
30
—
99
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings, excluding purchased loans, by collateral types,
classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Accruing Loans
Collateral Type
Warehouse
Raw land
Hotel and motel
Office
Retail, including strip centers
1-4 family residential
Automobile/equipment/CD
Livestock
Unsecured
Total
#
3
3
1
1
6
84
7
—
1
106
Balance
(in thousands)
$
$
244
114
224
155
2,067
8,218
468
—
156
11,646
59
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
1
2
1
—
—
20
33
1
1
59
$
$
119
120
241
—
—
1,631
356
14
1
2,482
As of December 31, 2018
Accruing Loans
Collateral Type
Warehouse
Raw land
Hotel and motel
Office
Retail, including strip centers
1-4 family residential
Automobile/equipment/CD
Livestock
Unsecured
Total
#
5
7
1
1
6
71
8
—
—
99
Balance
(in thousands)
$
544
435
260
161
1,980
5,835
108
—
—
$
9,323
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
1
1
1
—
—
21
36
1
1
62
$
137
2
246
—
—
1,161
188
18
2
$
1,754
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had a balance of $21.1 million and $22.2 million, respectively, in troubled
debt restructurings included in purchased loans. The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan
class of purchased loans, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Accruing Loans
#
1
4
9
114
—
128
Balance
(in thousands)
$
30
872
3,992
13,069
—
$
17,963
Accruing Loans
#
1
4
12
115
—
132
Balance
(in thousands)
$
31
1,015
6,162
11,532
—
$
18,740
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
3
2
6
19
6
36
$
$
23
252
1,712
1,106
48
3,141
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
3
5
7
24
4
43
$
$
32
293
1,685
1,424
17
3,451
60
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of purchased loans, classified separately
as those currently paying under restructured terms and those that have defaulted (defined as 30 days past due) under
restructured terms at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Loans Currently
Paying Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
Loans that have
Defaulted Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
2
—
4
31
2
39
$
$
6
—
1,332
2,495
18
3,851
2
6
11
102
4
125
$
47
1,124
4,372
11,680
30
$
17,253
Loans Currently
Paying Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
Loans that have
Defaulted Under
Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
#
4
8
17
106
3
138
$
63
1,305
7,576
10,040
14
$
18,998
—
1
2
33
1
37
$
$
—
3
271
2,916
3
3,193
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings included in purchased loans, by types of concessions
made, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Type of Concession
Forbearance of interest
Forbearance of principal
Forbearance of principal, extended amortization
Rate reduction only
Rate reduction, forbearance of interest
Rate reduction, forbearance of principal
Rate reduction, forgiveness of interest
Total
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
$
432
2,569
—
9,000
2,264
1,713
1,985
9
6
1
5
8
3
4
$
1,277
560
226
451
271
144
212
#
5
8
—
62
25
6
22
128
$
17,963
36
$
3,141
61
As of December 31, 2018
Type of Concession
Forbearance of interest
Forbearance of principal
Forbearance of principal, extended amortization
Rate reduction only
Rate reduction, forbearance of interest
Rate reduction, forbearance of principal
Rate reduction, forgiveness of interest
Total
Accruing Loans
#
5
6
—
73
24
8
16
Balance
(in thousands)
$
224
2,368
—
10,911
2,304
1,635
1,298
132
$
18,740
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
10
$
1,751
3
1
6
14
6
3
43
226
258
285
356
368
207
$
3,451
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings included in purchased loans, by collateral types,
classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Accruing Loans
Collateral Type
Warehouse
Raw land
Hotel and motel
Office
Retail, including strip centers
1-4 family residential
Church
Automobile/equipment/CD
Total
#
1
2
1
2
5
116
—
1
128
Balance
(in thousands)
$
23
755
140
376
3,453
13,186
—
30
$
17,963
As of December 31, 2018
Accruing Loans
Collateral Type
Warehouse
Raw land
Hotel and motel
Office
Retail, including strip centers
1-4 family residential
Church
Automobile/equipment/CD
Total
#
2
2
1
2
5
118
1
1
Balance
(in thousands)
$
356
873
145
419
3,882
11,837
1,197
31
132
$
18,740
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
1
3
—
1
—
20
1
10
36
$
$
323
612
—
342
—
1,601
183
80
3,141
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
—
6
—
2
—
26
1
8
43
$
$
—
718
—
457
—
2,009
201
65
3,450
62
LIQUIDITY AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
Liquidity management involves the matching of the cash flow requirements of customers, who may be either depositors
desiring to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs, and
the ability of our Company to meet those needs. We seek to meet liquidity requirements primarily through management of
short-term investments (principally interest-bearing deposits in banks) and monthly amortizing loans. Another source of
liquidity is the repayment of maturing single payment
loans. In addition, our Company maintains relationships with
correspondent banks, including the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, which could provide funds on short notice,
if needed.
A principal objective of our asset/liability management strategy is to minimize our exposure to changes in interest rates by
matching the maturity and repricing horizons of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. This strategy is overseen
in part through the direction of our Asset and Liability Committee (the “ALCO Committee”) which establishes policies and
monitors results to control interest rate sensitivity.
As part of our interest rate risk management policy, the ALCO Committee examines the extent to which its assets and liabilities
are “interest rate sensitive” and monitors its interest rate-sensitivity “gap.” An asset or liability is considered to be interest rate
sensitive if it will reprice or mature within the time period analyzed, usually one year or less. The interest rate-sensitivity gap is
the difference between the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time
period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-
sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate-
sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while
a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap
would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest
income. If our assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in
interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.
A simple interest rate “gap” analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator of how net interest income will be affected by
changes in interest rates. Accordingly, the ALCO Committee also evaluates how the repayment of particular assets and
liabilities is impacted by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with
interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of
changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and
liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may not react identically to changes in market interest
rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market interest rates,
while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable
rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as “interest rate caps”) which limit changes in interest rates on a short-
term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels also
could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the interest rate gap. The ability of many borrowers to service
their debts also may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.
We manage the mix of asset and liability maturities in an effort to control the effects of changes in the general level of interest
rates on net interest income. Except for its effect on the general level of interest rates, inflation does not have a material impact
on the balance sheet due to the rate variability and short-term maturities of its earning assets. In particular, approximately
39.7% of earning assets mature or reprice within one year or less. Mortgage loans, generally our loan category with the longest
maturity, are usually made with fifteen to thirty year maturities, but a portion is at a variable interest rate with an adjustment
between origination date and maturity date.
In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, which is the authority that regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop
compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The ARRC has proposed a paced market transition
plan to SOFR from LIBOR, and organizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition plans as
it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to LIBOR. The Company has material contracts that are indexed to LIBOR,
which include certain financial instruments within investment securities, loans, other borrowings, subordinated deferrable
interest debentures and derivative financial instruments. Company management is monitoring this development in the financial
markets and is evaluating the related risks. The Company has established a working committee with representatives from
relevant functional areas to inventory the contracts and accounts that are tied to LIBOR and develop a transition plan for the
affected items.
63
The following table sets forth the distribution of the repricing of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of
December 31, 2019, the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets minus interest rate sensitive liabilities), the
cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap, the interest rate sensitivity gap ratio (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest
rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which
earning assets and liabilities will mature or may reprice in accordance with their contractual terms. However, the table does not
necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the repricing of various
categories of assets and liabilities is subject to competitive pressures and the needs of our customers. In addition, various assets
and liabilities indicated as repricing within the same period may in fact reprice at different times within such period and at
different rates.
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing
deposits in banks
Time deposits in other banks
Investment securities
Loans held for sale
Loans
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits
Money market deposit accounts
Savings
Time deposits
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
FHLB advances
Other borrowings
Trust preferred securities
December 31, 2019
Maturing or Repricing Within
One to
Five
Years
Three
Months to
One Year
Over
Five
Years
Zero to
Three
Months
Total
$
375,615
$
— $
— $
— $
375,615
—
69,563
1,656,711
2,043,566
1,184,571
3,768
—
25,341
—
797,315
303,506
20,908
249
112,169
—
2,164,497
2,235,545
153,650
—
1,263,249
—
2,524,609
1,351,659
34,882
249
1,470,322
1,656,711
7,529,987
5,075,281
213,208
5,333,794
1,147,070
4,666,110
5,174,399
16,321,373
2,366,109
3,952,246
641,897
653,761
20,635
1,125,000
—
90,446
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,366,109
3,952,246
641,897
1,663,954
547,601
2,057
2,867,373
—
—
—
37,114
—
—
193,244
—
—
4,119
76,346
—
20,635
1,129,119
269,590
127,560
8,850,094
1,701,068
740,845
82,522
11,374,529
Interest rate sensitivity gap
$ (3,516,300) $
(553,998) $ 3,925,265
$ 5,091,877
$ 4,946,844
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
$ (3,516,300) $ (4,070,298) $
(145,033) $ 4,946,844
Interest rate sensitivity gap ratio
0.60
0.67
6.30
62.70
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
ratio
0.60
0.61
0.99
1.43
64
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
Following is a summary of the carrying value of investment securities available for sale as of the end of each reported period:
(dollars in thousands)
U.S. government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
SBA pool securities
Mortgage-backed securities
2019
December 31,
2018
$
22,362
$
— $
105,260
52,999
73,912
1,148,870
150,733
67,314
77,804
896,572
$
1,403,403
$
1,192,423
$
2017
—
137,794
47,143
90,582
535,354
810,873
The amounts of securities available for sale in each category as of December 31, 2019 are shown in the following table
according to contractual maturity classifications: (i) one year or less, (ii) after one year through five years, (iii) after five years
through ten years and (iv) after ten years.
(dollars in thousands)
One year or less
After one year through five years
After five years through ten years
After ten years
U.S. Government
Sponsored Agencies
Yield
(1)
Amount
State, County and
Municipal Securities
Yield
(1)(2)
Amount
Corporate Debt
Securities
Amount
$
5,004
2.12 % $
24,294
3.29 % $
—
16,270
1,088
—
1.92 %
2.16 %
— %
29,206
27,982
23,778
3.40 %
3.52 %
3.41 %
14,713
36,312
1,974
$
22,362
1.97 % $ 105,260
3.41 % $
52,999
Yield
(1)
— %
2.80 %
5.40 %
5.65 %
4.68 %
SBA Pool Securities
Yield
(1)
Amount
Amount
Mortgage-backed
Securities
One year or less
After one year through five years
After five years through ten years
After ten years
$
—
— % $
187
2,841
28,440
42,631
2.09 %
2.17 %
2.68 %
49,139
306,508
793,036
$
73,912
2.46 % $1,148,870
Yield
(1)
3.04 %
2.79 %
2.81 %
2.54 %
2.62 %
(1) Yields were computed using coupon interest, adding discount accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as
appropriate, on a ratable basis over the life of each security. The weighted average yield for each maturity range was
computed using the amortized cost of each security in that range.
(2) Yields on securities of state and political subdivisions are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, using a tax rate of 21%.
The investment portfolio consists of securities which are classified as available for sale and recorded at fair value with
unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of the related
deferred tax effect.
The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the
interest method over the life of the securities. Realized gains and losses, determined on the basis of the cost of specific
securities sold, are included in earnings on the trade date. Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are
deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses.
The Company’s methodology for determining whether other-than-temporary impairment losses exist include management
considering (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer or underlying collateral of the security, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain
its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
65
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when
economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Substantially all of the unrealized losses on debt securities are related to
changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the issuer or underlying collateral. All unrealized losses
are considered temporary because each security carries an acceptable investment grade, the Company has the intent and ability
to hold such securities until maturity and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities
prior to recovery or maturity. The Company’s investments in subordinated debt include investments in regional and super-
regional banks on which the Company conducts regular analysis through review of financial information or credit ratings.
Investments in preferred securities are also concentrated in the preferred obligations of regional and super-regional banks
through non-pooled investment structures. The Company did not hold any investments in “pooled” trust preferred securities at
December 31, 2019.
DEPOSITS
Average amount of various deposit classes and the average rates paid thereon are presented below.
(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand
NOW
Money market
Savings
Time
Total deposits
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
$
3,364,785
— % $
2,164,171
— %
1,831,024
3,280,233
529,866
2,696,533
0.54
1.29
0.13
1.84
1,441,849
2,240,115
350,214
1,666,639
0.34
0.95
0.08
1.35
$ 11,702,441
0.88 % $
7,862,988
0.62 %
We have a large, stable base of time deposits with little or no dependence on what we consider volatile deposits. Volatile
deposits, in management’s opinion, are those deposit accounts that are overly rate sensitive and apt to move if our rate offerings
are not at or near the top of the market. Generally speaking, these are brokered deposits or time deposits in amount greater than
$100,000.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had brokered deposits of $452.7 million. The amounts of time certificates of deposit
issued in amounts of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2019, are shown below by category, which is based on time
remaining until maturity of (i) three months or less, (ii) over three through twelve months and (iii) greater than one year.
(dollars in thousands)
Three months or less
Three months to one year
One year or greater
Total
December 31,
2019
$
$
479,264
1,068,594
325,980
1,873,838
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
In the ordinary course of business, our Bank has granted commitments to extend credit to approved customers. Generally, these
commitments to extend credit have been granted on a temporary basis for seasonal or inventory requirements or for
construction period financing and have been approved within the Bank’s credit guidelines. Our Bank has also granted
commitments to approved customers for financial standby letters of credit. These commitments are recorded in the financial
statements when funds are disbursed or the financial instruments become payable. The Bank uses the same credit policies for
these off-balance-sheet commitments as it does for financial instruments that are recorded in the consolidated financial
statements. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee. Since many of the commitment amounts expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements.
66
The following table summarizes commitments outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit
Unused lines of credit
Financial standby letters of credit
Mortgage interest rate lock commitments
Mortgage forward contracts with positive fair value
Mortgage forward contracts with negative fair value
December 31,
2019
2018
$
2,486,949
$
1,671,419
262,089
29,232
288,490
—
112,310
24,596
81,833
—
1,814,669
163,189
$
4,881,429
$
2,053,347
The following table summarizes short-term borrowings for the periods indicated.
(dollars in thousands)
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreement to repurchase
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
$ 14,043
0.61 % $ 15,692
0.15 % $ 28,694
0.20 %
(dollars in thousands)
Total maximum short-term borrowings outstanding
at any month-end during the year
2019
Total
Balance
Year Ended December 31,
2018
Total
Balance
2017
Total
Balance
$ 23,626
$ 23,270
$ 49,836
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had a cash flow hedge that matures September 15, 2020 with a notional
amount of $37.1 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, for the purpose of converting the variable rate on the junior
subordinated debentures to a fixed rate of 4.11%. The interest rate swap, which is classified as a cash flow hedge, is indexed to
90-Day LIBOR.
As of December 31, 2019, letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $82.4 million were used to guarantee
the Bank’s performance related to a portion of its public fund deposit balances.
The following table sets forth certain information about contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2019.
(dollars in thousands)
Deposits without a stated maturity
Time certificates of deposit
Repurchase agreements with customers
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Operating lease obligations
Strategic marketing and promotional arrangements
Payments Due After December 31, 2019
1-3
Years
1 Year
or Less
4-5
Years
Total
$11,159,700 $11,159,700 $
— $
— $
2,867,373
2,317,715
494,421
53,180
20,635
20,635
1,400,249
1,125,000
159,545
45,295
2,700
—
11,818
—
—
—
—
17,334
1,800
—
—
—
8,605
900
>5
Years
—
2,057
—
275,249
159,545
7,538
—
Total contractual cash obligations
$15,655,497 $14,634,868 $
513,555
$
62,685
$
444,389
At December 31, 2019, estimated costs to complete construction projects in progress and other binding commitments for capital
expenditures were not a material amount.
67
CAPITAL ADEQUACY
Capital Regulations
The capital resources of the Company are monitored on a periodic basis by state and federal regulatory authorities. During
2019, the Company’s capital increased $1.01 billion, primarily due to the issuance of Common Stock of $869.3 million and net
income of $161.4 million, which amounts were partially offset by the cash dividends declared on common shares of $30.4
million and treasury stock purchases of $18.4 million. During 2018, the Company’s capital increased $547.1 million, primarily
due to the issuance of Common Stock of $547.1 million and net income of $121.0 million, which amounts were partially offset
by the cash dividends declared on common shares of $17.4 million. For both 2019 and 2018, other capital related transactions,
such as other comprehensive income, share-based compensation, common stock issuances through the exercise of stock
options, and issuances of shares of restricted stock accounted for only a small change in the capital of the Company.
In accordance with risk capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve, we are required to maintain a minimum standard of
total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%. Additionally, all member banks must maintain “core” or “Tier 1” capital of at least
4% of total assets (“leverage ratio”). Member banks operating at or near the 4% capital level are expected to have well-
diversified risks, including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent control systems, good earnings, high asset quality and
well managed on- and off-balance sheet activities, and, in general, be considered strong banking organizations with a composite
1 rating under the CAMEL rating system of banks. For all but the most highly rated banks meeting the above conditions, the
minimum leverage ratio is to be 4% plus an additional 1% to 2%.
The final rules implementing Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (“Basel III rules”)
became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a
multi-year schedule, and fully phased in by January 1, 2019. Under the Basel III rules, the Company must hold a capital
conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer is being phased in
from 0.0% for 2015 to 2.50% by 2019. The capital conservation buffer was 0.625% for 2016, 1.250% for 2017, 1.875% for
2018 and 2.50% for 2019.
The following table summarizes the regulatory capital levels of Ameris at December 31, 2019.
(dollars in thousands)
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (tier 1 capital to average
assets)
Actual
Required
Excess
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$1,437,991
8.476 % $ 678,650
4.000 % $ 759,341
$1,649,699
9.733 % $ 677,973
4.000 % $ 971,726
CET1 Ratio (common equity tier 1 capital to
risk weighted assets)
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$1,437,991
9.925 % $1,014,173
7.000 % $ 423,818
$1,649,699
11.394 % $1,013,485
7.000 % $ 636,214
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (tier 1 capital to risk
weighted assets)
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$1,437,991
9.925 % $1,231,495
8.500 % $ 206,496
$1,649,699
11.394 % $1,230,661
8.500 % $ 419,038
Total Capital Ratio (total capital to risk
weighted assets)
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$1,874,817
12.940 % $1,521,259
10.500 % $ 353,558
$1,763,965
12.183 % $1,520,228
10.500 % $ 243,737
4.476 %
5.733 %
2.925 %
4.394 %
1.425 %
2.894 %
2.440 %
1.683 %
The required CET1 Ratio, Tier 1 Capital Ratio, and the Total Capital Ratio reflected in the table above include a capital
conservation buffer of 2.50%.
68
INFLATION
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results
in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to
inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in
nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of
general levels of inflation.
69
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain consolidated quarterly financial information of the Company. This information is derived
in the opinion of management, all normal recurring
from unaudited consolidated financial statements, which include,
adjustments which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods.
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense excluding merger and conversion
charges
Merger and conversion charges
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Per Share Data:
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common dividends - cash
(dollars in thousands)
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense excluding merger and conversion
charges
Merger and conversion charges
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Per Share Data:
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common dividends - cash
Three Months Ended
December 31,
2019
September 30,
2019
June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019
$
194,076
$
188,361
$
129,028
$
124,929
38,725
155,351
5,693
149,658
55,113
120,149
2,415
82,207
20,959
39,592
148,769
5,989
142,780
76,993
127,539
65,158
27,076
5,692
27,377
101,651
4,668
96,983
35,236
77,776
3,475
50,968
12,064
61,248
$
21,384
$
38,904
$
$
0.88
0.88
0.15
$
0.31
0.31
0.15
$
0.82
0.82
0.10
$
$
25,534
99,395
3,408
95,987
30,771
73,368
2,057
51,333
11,428
39,905
0.84
0.84
0.10
Three Months Ended
December 31,
2018
September 30,
2018
June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018
$
122,749
$
121,119
$
89,946
$
23,195
99,554
3,661
95,893
30,470
74,813
997
50,553
7,017
22,081
99,038
2,095
96,943
30,171
72,077
276
54,761
13,317
13,947
75,999
9,110
66,889
31,307
67,995
18,391
11,810
2,423
43,536
$
41,444
$
9,387
$
$
0.92
0.91
0.10
$
0.87
0.87
0.10
$
0.24
0.24
0.10
$
$
70
79,512
10,711
68,801
1,801
67,000
26,464
58,263
835
34,366
7,706
26,660
0.70
0.70
0.10
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed only to U.S. Dollar interest rate changes and, accordingly, we manage exposure by considering the possible
changes in the net interest margin. We do not have any trading instruments nor do we classify any portion of the investment
portfolio as trading. Finally, we have no exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk or other market
risks.
Interest rates play a major part in the net interest income of a financial institution. The sensitivity to rate changes is known as
“interest rate risk.” The repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities can influence the changes in net
interest income. As part of our asset/liability management program, the timing of repriced assets and liabilities is referred to as
gap management.
As indicated by the table below, we are slightly asset sensitive in relation to changes in market interest rates in the one-year and
two-year time horizons. Being asset sensitive would result in net interest income increasing in a rising rate environment and
decreasing in a declining rate environment.
We use simulation analysis to monitor changes in net interest income due to changes in market interest rates. The simulation of
rising, declining and flat interest rate scenarios allow management to monitor and adjust interest rate sensitivity to minimize the
impact of market interest rate swings. The analysis of the impact on net interest income over a twelve-month period is subjected
to an instantaneous 100 basis point increase or 100 basis point decrease in market rates on net interest income and is monitored
on a quarterly basis. Our most recent model projects net interest income would increase slightly if rates rise 100 basis points
over the next year. A scenario involving more than a 100 basis point decrease is irrelevant at this time due to the level of current
market rates.
The following table presents the earnings simulation model’s projected impact of a change in interest rates on the projected
baseline net interest income for the 12- and 24-month periods commencing January 1, 2020. This change in interest rates
assumes parallel shifts in the yield curve and does not take into account changes in the slope of the yield curve.
Earnings Simulation Model Results
Change in
Interest Rates
(in bps)
% Change in Projected Baseline
Net Interest Income
12 Months
24 Months
400
300
200
100
(100)
4.9%
4.1%
3.1%
1.7%
(1.1)%
16.4%
13.2%
9.4%
5.0%
(4.2)%
In the event of a shift in interest rates, we may take certain actions intended to mitigate the negative impact to net interest
income or to maximize the positive impact to net interest income. These actions may include, but are not limited to,
restructuring of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, seeking alternative funding sources or investment
opportunities and modifying the pricing or terms of loans, leases and deposits.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and related notes presented elsewhere in this report have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP. This requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without
considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial
companies, the vast majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact
on our performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction
or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
71
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report, as required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on
such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the material weakness described below.
Not withstanding the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 described
below, senior management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report present
fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As permitted, the Company has excluded the operations of Fidelity acquired during 2019, as described in Note 2 of the
consolidated financial statements. The assets acquired in the Fidelity acquisition and excluded from management’s assessment
of internal control over financial reporting comprised approximately 26.1% of total consolidated assets at December 31, 2019.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (2013 framework) (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment and those
criteria, management determined that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019 due to the material weakness identified below.
A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is
a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on
a timely basis.
72
As of December 31, 2019, the Company identified a control deficiency related to certain general ledger account reconciliations
that began as of the conversion of Fidelity’s core platform on November 3, 2019. While the reconciliations were completed in
a timely manner, various items, which were principally related to the acquired indirect auto loan portfolio, were not researched
and resolved in a timely manner. Further review and analysis indicate that clearing of the items did not have any material
adverse impact to customer account balances or the Company's financial condition or results of operations as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2019. However, this control deficiency creates a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the
consolidated financial statements would not have been prevented or detected on a timely basis, and as such, management has
concluded that the control deficiency represents a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.
Management has been actively engaged during the first quarter of 2020 in developing remediation plans to address the material
weakness. These plans include: (i) additional training for accounting staff performing the reconciliations; (ii) development of
more detailed reconciliation procedures to allow for more timely research and resolution of items; (iii) increased personnel in
the accounting department to ensure timeliness of clearing reconciling items; and (iv) the review of the system interface to the
general ledger such that the number of reconciling items among impacted balance sheet accounts will be reduced.
The Company’s material weakness will not be considered remediated until the remediation plans have been implemented and
tested and management concludes these controls are operating effectively.
Crowe LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That report is included in this Annual Report on page F-2.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than as described above in the report of the Company's management on internal control over financial reporting, during
the quarter ended December 31, 2019, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified
in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
73
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information set forth under the captions “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors,” “Board and Committee Matters,”
“Information About Our Executive Officers” and “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports” in the Proxy Statement to be used in
connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC,
is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Ethics
Ameris has adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to all employees, including its Chief Executive Officer and all senior
financial officers, including its Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer. Ameris will provide to any person
without charge, upon request, a copy of its code of ethics. Such requests should be directed to the Corporate Secretary of
Ameris Bancorp at 3490 Piedmont Road N.E., Suite 1550, Atlanta, Georgia 30305.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the
solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC, is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy
Statement to be used in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to
be filed with the SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to securities to be issued under our equity compensation plans as
of December 31, 2019.
Plan Category
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Weighted
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
387,193
$
26.51
699,992
(1) Consists of our 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, which provides for the granting to directors, officers and
certain other employees of qualified or nonqualified stock options, stock units, stock awards, stock appreciation rights,
dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information set forth under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Proposal 1 – Election of
Directors” in the Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2020 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
74
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information set forth under the caption “Proposal 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor” in the Proxy
Statement to be used in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to
be filed with the SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
1.
Financial statements:
(a) Ameris Bancorp and Subsidiaries:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2019 and 2018;
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017;
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017;
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017;
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017; and
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b) Ameris Bancorp (parent company only):
Parent company only financial information has been included in Note 24 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
2.
3.
Financial statement schedules:
All schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial
statements or related notes.
A list of the Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K to be filed as a part of this Annual Report is shown on
the “Exhibit Index” filed herewith.
75
Exhibit
No.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Description
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 16, 2017 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Atlantic
Coast Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 17, 2017).
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 29, 2017 by and between Ameris Bancorp and William J.
Villari (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration No. 333-223080) filed with the SEC on February 16, 2018).
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 25, 2018 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Hamilton
State Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2018).
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 25, 2018 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank,
William J. Villari and The Villari Family Gift Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2018).
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 17, 2018 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Fidelity
Southern Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on December 17, 2018).
Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed with the SEC on August 14, 1987).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 1999).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2003).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 1, 2005).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 21, 2008).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 1, 2011).
Bylaws of Ameris Bancorp, as amended and restated through July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company dated September 20, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-138252) filed with the SEC on October 27, 2006).
Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture dated September 20, 2006 to Ameris
Statutory Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-138252) filed with the SEC on October 27, 2006).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and U.S. Bank
National Association dated as of March 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
76
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2033 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas dated as of June 24, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Note Due 2034 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.8 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of January 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of January 31, 2006)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2036 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of September 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of September 20, 2007)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2037 (included as
Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.18 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Coastal Bankshares, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association dated as of August 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Ameris Bancorp and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association (pertaining to Indenture dated as of August 27, 2003) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2033 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit
4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Coastal Bankshares, Inc.) and U.S. Bank National
Association dated as of December 14, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Coastal Bankshares,
Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association (pertaining to Indenture dated as of December 14, 2005)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 1, 2014).
77
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2035 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit
4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated)
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of March 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 22, 2015 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Merchants &
Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of
March 17, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2035 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
May 27, 2015).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated)
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of March 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 22, 2015 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Merchants &
Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of
March 30, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2036 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
May 27, 2015).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of June 17, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Jacksonville
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2034 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2016).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of September 15, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Jacksonville
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2035 (included as
Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of December 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Jacksonville
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
78
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2036 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2016).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association dated as of June 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2038 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit
4.10 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Subordinated Debt Indenture dated as of March 13, 2017 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Wilmington
Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2017).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 13, 2017, by and between Ameris Bancorp and Wilmington
Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2017).
Form of 5.75% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Note due 2027 (included as Exhibit A to the First
Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on March 13, 2017).
Indenture dated as of November 10, 2005 by and between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Hamilton State
Bancshares, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 2, 2018).
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 29, 2018 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Hamilton State
Bancshares, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 2, 2018).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture (included as Exhibit A to the
Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 2,
2018).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Fidelity Southern Corporation) and U.S. Bank National
Association, dated as of June 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
First Supplemental Indenture, among Ameris Bancorp, Fidelity Southern Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, dated as of July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2033 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1,
2019).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Fidelity Southern Corporation) and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of March 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
First Supplemental Indenture, among Ameris Bancorp, Fidelity Southern Corporation and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
79
4.50
4.51
4.52
4.53
4.54
4.55
4.56
4.57
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*
10.5*
10.6*
10.7*
10.8*
10.9*
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2035 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1,
2019).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Fidelity Southern Corporation) and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of August 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
First Supplemental Indenture, among Ameris Bancorp, Fidelity Southern Corporation and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2037 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1,
2019).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 6, 2019, by and between Ameris Bancorp and
Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris
Bancorp's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 6, 2019).
Form of 4.25% Fixed-to-Floating Subordinated Notes due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 6, 2019).
Form of Global Note representing Fixed/Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030
Description of the Registrant's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Jon S. Edwards, dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Cindi H. Lewis, dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Nicole S. Stokes, dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 1, 2018).
Ameris Bancorp 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to
Ameris Bancorp’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 17, 2014).
Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement by and between Ameris Bank and Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
dated as of November 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q
filed with the SEC on November 9, 2016).
80
10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
First Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement by and between Ameris Bank and Cindi
H. Lewis dated as of November 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form
10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2016).
Retirement Agreement dated June 6, 2018 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Edwin W.
Hortman, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2018).
Form of Severance Protection and Restrictive Covenants Agreement for executive officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 10, 2019).
Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and James B. Miller, Jr. dated as of
December 17, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed with the
SEC on August 9, 2019).
Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and H. Palmer Proctor, Jr. dated as of
December 17, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed with the
SEC on August 9, 2019).
Amendment to Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and H. Palmer Proctor,
Jr. dated as of June 30, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC on August 9, 2019).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Lawton E. Bassett, III, dated as of November 7, 2012.
Form of Performance Stock Unit Grant Agreement.
Schedule of Subsidiaries of Ameris Bancorp.
Consent of Crowe LLP.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer.
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its
XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data
File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
* Management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement.
81
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
F-2
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8
F-10
F-12
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Crowe LLP
Independent Member Crowe Global
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ameris Bancorp
Atlanta, Georgia
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ameris Bancorp and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31,
2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March
9, 2020 expressed an adverse opinion.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits
included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and
performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the
financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit
matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical
audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the account or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for Loan Losses – Qualitative Factors
As described in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 4 – Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company estimates and records an allowance for loan losses that management believes will be adequate to absorb
estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred losses in the balance of the loan portfolio. For loans that
are not specifically identified for impairment, management determines the allowance for loan losses based on historical loss experience
adjusted for qualitative factors, such as the growth and mix of the loan portfolio, current loan quality trends, current economic conditions,
commodity prices for agriculture products, and other factors in the markets where the Company operates. The Company’s qualitative factors
currently utilized in determining the allowance for loan losses are higher compared with prior periods, and now represent a significant portion
of the allowance for loan loss estimate. Management exercised significant judgment when assessing these qualitative factors in estimating the
allowance for loan losses, which in turn required significant auditor judgment to audit these adjustments. We identified the qualitative factor
component of the allowance for loan losses as a critical audit matter as auditing this component of the allowance for loan losses involved
especially complex and subjective auditor judgment. The principal consideration for our determination of this matter as a critical audit matter
is that the Company’s historical loss experience is minimal and management’s adjustments for qualitative factors depend significantly on
management’s professional judgment.
F-2
The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:
•
•
•
•
•
Tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s allowance for loan losses, including controls over the
completeness and accuracy of data utilized in assessing the qualitative factors, reasonableness of assumptions and judgement
applied including directional consistency in application, and mathematical accuracy of the calculation.
Evaluated management’s judgments and assumptions used in the development of the qualitative adjustments for reasonableness,
and the reliability of the underlying data on which these adjustments are based.
Evaluated the relevance of management’s judgements, assumptions, and data used in the development of the qualitative factor
adjustments made by management.
Performed data validation of inputs and tested mathematical accuracy of management’s calculation.
Performed substantive analytical procedures on the year-end allowance balance and year-to-date provision expense.
Business Combinations – Fair Value of Acquired Loans
As described in Note 2 – Business Combinations to the consolidated financial statements, on July 1, 2019 the Company completed its
acquisition of Fidelity Southern Corporation (“Fidelity”) for total consideration of $869.3 million. Determination of the acquisition date fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions. As disclosed by
management, the fair value of a loan portfolio acquired in a business combination requires greater levels of management estimates and
judgment than the remainder of purchased assets or assumed liabilities. In determining the fair value of loans acquired, management must
determine whether or not acquired loans have evidence of credit deterioration at acquisition, the amount and timing of cash flows expected to
be collected, and market discount rates, among other assumptions. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair
value of the loans acquired and the amount of goodwill recorded.
We identified the acquisition date fair value of acquired loans as a critical audit matter as auditing this estimate is especially complex and
requires subjective auditor judgment. The principal considerations for our determination that this is a critical audit matter is the level of
judgement involved in evaluating management’s identification of loans with evidence of credit deterioration, the need for specialized skill in
development and application of subjective assumptions in estimated cash flows, and the size of the acquired loan portfolio.
We performed the following procedures in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements.
•
•
•
•
•
Tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s identification of loans with credit deterioration at acquisition date
and valuation of these loans, selection of the third-party valuation specialist and review of work performed including application of
subjective assumptions in estimating cash flows, and completeness and accuracy of the data utilized in the fair value determination
by the third-party specialist.
Evaluated the significant assumptions and methods utilized in developing the fair value of the loan portfolio, including review of
significant assumptions, and evaluating whether the assumptions used were reasonable considering past acquisitions and current
market participant views and other factors.
Utilized a valuation specialist to assist in testing the Company’s calculation of fair value of the loan portfolio acquired and certain
significant assumptions, including among other assumptions, prepayment speeds and discount rates.
Tested the completeness and accuracy of loans determined to have credit deterioration at acquisition and evaluated the
reasonableness of the criteria utilized by management in the determination.
Tested the accuracy of the data utilized in the acquisition date fair value by confirming, on a sample basis, select data.
/s/ Crowe LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014.
Atlanta, Georgia
March 9, 2020
F-3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Crowe LLP
Independent Member Crowe Global
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ameris Bancorp
Atlanta, Georgia
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Ameris Bancorp and Subsidiaries' (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on
criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). In our opinion, because of the effects of the material weakness discussed in the following paragraph, the Company has not
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The following material weakness has been identified and included in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
to the conversion of Fidelity’s core system to Ameris’s core system on November 3, 2019, certain balance sheet account
Subsequent
reconciliations were being prepared, but reconciling items were not being researched and cleared in a timely manner.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes
(collectively referred to as the "financial statements") and our report dated March 9, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion. We considered the
material weakness identified above in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures applied in our audit of the 2019 financial
statements, and this report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting does not affect such report on the financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Crowe LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 9, 2020
F-4
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2019 and 2018
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
Federal funds sold
Cash and cash equivalents
Time deposits in other banks
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
Other investments
Loans held for sale, at fair value
Loans
Purchased loans
Purchased loan pools
Loans, net of unearned income
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
Other real estate owned, net
Purchased other real estate owned, net
Total other real estate owned, net
Premises and equipment, net
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Cash value of bank owned life insurance
Deferred income taxes, net
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures, net
FDIC loss-share payable, net
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 21)
2019
2018
$
$
246,234
351,202
24,413
621,849
172,036
472,443
35,048
679,527
249
1,403,403
66,919
1,656,711
7,529,987
5,075,281
213,208
12,818,476
(38,189)
12,780,287
4,500
15,000
19,500
10,812
1,192,423
14,455
111,298
5,660,457
2,588,832
262,625
8,511,914
(28,819)
8,483,095
7,218
9,535
16,753
233,102
931,637
91,586
175,270
2,180
259,886
$ 18,242,579
145,410
503,434
58,689
104,096
35,126
88,397
$ 11,443,515
$
$
4,199,448
9,827,625
14,027,073
20,635
1,398,709
127,560
19,642
179,378
15,772,997
2,520,016
7,129,297
9,649,313
20,384
151,774
89,187
19,487
57,023
9,987,168
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, stated value $1,000; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, par value $1; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 71,499,829 and 49,014,925 shares issued
Capital surplus
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,995,996 and 1,514,984 shares
Total shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
—
71,500
1,907,108
507,950
17,995
(34,971)
2,469,582
$ 18,242,579
—
49,015
1,051,584
377,135
(4,826)
(16,561)
1,456,347
$ 11,443,515
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2019
2018
2017
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans
Interest on taxable securities
Interest on nontaxable securities
Interest on deposits in other banks
Interest on federal funds sold
Total interest income
Interest expense
Interest on deposits
Interest on other borrowings
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts
Mortgage banking activity
Other service charges, commissions and fees
Net gain (loss) on securities
Gain on sale of SBA loans
Other noninterest income
Total noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Advertising and marketing
Amortization of intangible assets
Data processing and communications expenses
Legal and other professional fees
Credit resolution-related expenses
Merger and conversion charges
FDIC insurance
Other noninterest expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted earnings per common share
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic
Diluted
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
586,848
40,138
593
8,139
676
636,394
102,533
28,695
131,228
505,166
19,758
485,408
50,792
119,409
3,913
138
6,058
17,803
198,113
223,938
40,596
7,927
17,713
38,513
10,634
4,082
73,105
1,945
53,484
471,937
211,584
50,143
161,441
2.76
2.75
58,462
58,614
$
$
$
$
378,209
29,006
900
4,984
227
413,326
49,054
20,880
69,934
343,392
16,667
326,725
46,128
53,654
3,059
(37)
2,728
12,880
118,412
149,132
29,131
5,571
9,512
30,385
6,386
4,016
20,499
3,408
35,607
293,647
151,490
30,463
121,027
2.81
2.80
43,142
43,248
270,887
20,154
1,581
1,725
—
294,347
19,877
14,345
34,222
260,125
8,364
251,761
42,054
48,535
2,883
37
4,590
6,358
104,457
119,783
24,069
5,131
3,932
27,869
15,355
3,493
915
3,078
28,311
231,936
124,282
50,734
73,548
2.00
1.98
36,828
37,144
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands)
Net income
2019
2018
2017
$
161,441
$
121,027
$
73,548
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period on investment
securities available for sale, net of tax expense (benefit) of $6,211, ($849) and
($169)
Reclassification adjustment for gains on investment securities included in
earnings, net of tax of $12, $19 and $13
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge during the period, net of tax
expense (benefit) of ($133), $30 and $63
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
23,365
(3,196)
(46)
(498)
22,821
(70)
112
(3,154)
(314)
(24)
116
(222)
Comprehensive income
$
184,262
$
117,873
$
73,326
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Capital
Surplus
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
Treasury Stock
Shares
Amount
Total
Shareholders'
Equity
36,377,807 $ 36,378
$ 410,276
$
214,454
$
(1,058)
1,456,333
$ (13,613) $
646,437
2,141,072
2,141
92,359
84,147
(472)
84
—
(84)
—
132,319
132
2,537
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,316
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
73,548
(14,883)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(222)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18,528
(886)
—
—
—
—
—
—
94,500
—
—
2,669
3,316
(886)
73,548
(14,883)
(222)
38,734,873 $ 38,735
$ 508,404
$
273,119
$
(1,280)
1,474,861
$ (14,499) $
804,479
10,124,491
10,124
537,003
89,855
90
(90)
(10,580)
(10)
76
—
—
—
—
—
—
76,286
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10
838
5,419
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
121,027
(17,431)
28
392
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(392)
(3,154)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
40,123
(2,062)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
547,127
—
—
914
5,419
(2,062)
121,027
(17,431)
28
—
(3,154)
49,014,925 $ 49,015
$1,051,584 $
377,135
$
(4,826)
1,514,984
$ (16,561) $
1,456,347
Balance at beginning of
period
Issuance of common
stock, net of issuance
costs of $4,925
Issuance of restricted
shares
Forfeitures of restricted
shares
Exercise of stock
options
Share-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury
shares
Net income
Dividends on common
shares ($0.40 per share)
Other comprehensive
income (loss) during
the period
Balance at December 31,
2017
Issuance of common
stock
Issuance of restricted
shares
Forfeitures of restricted
shares
Exercise of stock
options
Share-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury
shares
Net income
Dividends on common
shares ($0.40 per share)
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
for derivatives
Reclassification of
stranded income tax
effects
Other comprehensive
income (loss) during
the period
Balance at December 31,
2018
F-8
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Balance at January 1,
2019
Issuance of common
stock
Issuance of restricted
shares
Forfeitures of restricted
shares
Exercise of stock
options
Share-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury
shares
Net income
Dividends on common
shares ($0.50 per share)
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
for leases
Other comprehensive
income (loss) during
the period
Balance at December 31,
2019
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Capital
Surplus
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
Treasury Stock
Shares
Amount
Total
Shareholders'
Equity
49,014,925 $ 49,015
$1,051,584 $
377,135
$
(4,826)
1,514,984
$ (16,561) $
1,456,347
22,181,522
22,182
847,112
147,574
(41,295)
197,103
—
—
—
—
—
—
147
(41)
197
—
—
—
—
—
—
768
(518)
4,942
3,220
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
161,441
(30,350)
(276)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
22,821
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
481,012
(18,410)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
869,294
915
(559)
5,139
3,220
(18,410)
161,441
(30,350)
(276)
22,821
71,499,829 $ 71,500
$1,907,108 $
507,950
$
17,995
1,995,996
$ (34,971) $
2,469,582
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands)
Operating Activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
$
161,441
$
121,027
$
73,548
2019
2018
2017
Depreciation
Net losses (gains) on sale or disposal of premises and equipment
Net write-downs on other assets
Provision for loan losses
Net write-downs and losses on sale of other real estate owned
Share-based compensation expense
Amortization of intangible assets
Amortization of operating lease right of use assets
Provision for deferred taxes
Net amortization of investment securities available for sale
Net loss (gain) on securities
Accretion of discount on purchased loans
Amortization of premium on purchased loan pools
Net amortization (accretion) on other borrowings
Amortization of subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale
Payments received on mortgage loans held for sale
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale
Net gains on mortgage loans held for sale
Originations of SBA loans
Proceeds from sales of SBA loans
Net gains on sales of SBA loans
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
Gain on bank owned life insurance proceeds
Loss on sale of loans
Changes in FDIC loss-share receivable/payable, net of cash payments received
Increase in interest receivable
Increase (decrease) in interest payable
Increase (decrease) in taxes payable
Change attributable to other operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities
Investing Activities, net of effects of business combinations
Proceeds from maturities of time deposits in other banks
Purchases of securities available for sale
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of securities available for sale
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale
Net decrease (increase) in other investments
Net increase in loans, excluding purchased loans
Payments received on purchased loans
Purchase of acquired formerly serviced portfolio
Payments received on purchased loan pools
Purchases of premises and equipment
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
Payments received from (paid to) FDIC under loss-sharing agreements
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance
Proceeds from sales of loans
Net cash proceeds received from (paid in) acquisitions
Net cash used in investing activities
F-10
13,120
41
6,210
19,758
496
3,424
17,713
10,264
22,821
4,680
(138)
(20,255)
1,277
80
1,655
(3,791,311)
17,445
2,620,290
(74,546)
(41,435)
65,862
(6,058)
(2,692)
(3,583)
1,233
3,865
(15,392)
5,855
(3,597)
41,266
(940,211)
10,563
(219,352)
266,171
64,995
(44,935)
(1,934,070)
1,015,798
(103,530)
48,140
(11,581)
5,587
10,140
(3,710)
7,429
157,087
244,181
(487,087)
10,014
133
—
16,667
1,301
6,241
9,512
—
1,374
4,891
37
(11,918)
1,825
96
1,345
(1,768,934)
986
1,542,755
(37,336)
(27,820)
33,675
(2,728)
(1,819)
—
—
5,156
(10,965)
2,411
4,032
(10,761)
(108,803)
746
(290,649)
152,393
68,727
33,515
(470,156)
330,226
—
71,817
(10,009)
588
11,784
(3,791)
—
—
51,495
(53,314)
9,196
1,264
—
8,364
500
3,316
3,932
—
12,430
6,384
(37)
(11,308)
3,543
95
1,322
(1,502,314)
1,238
1,370,008
(46,913)
(33,104)
30,696
(4,590)
(1,588)
—
—
3,005
(3,728)
1,757
(473)
10,895
(62,562)
—
(113,261)
115,166
3,090
11,046
(1,016,409)
210,470
—
112,330
(3,760)
16
14,920
(515)
—
—
—
(666,907)
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands)
Financing Activities, net of effects of business combinations
Net increase in deposits
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Proceeds from other borrowings
Repayment of other borrowings
Issuance of common stock
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Dividends paid - common stock
Purchase of treasury shares
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
Income taxes
Loans (excluding purchased loans) transferred to other real estate owned
Purchased loans transferred to other real estate owned
Loans transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment
Loans transferred from loans held for investment to loans held for sale
Loans provided for the sales of other real estate owned
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets
Initial recognition of operating lease liabilities
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
Assets acquired in business combinations
Liabilities assumed in business combinations
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions
Issuance of common stock in exchange for equity investment in US Premium
Finance Holding Company
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax
Change in unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2019
2018
2017
$
334,437
(22,094)
5,236,572
(4,141,349)
—
5,139
(24,675)
(18,410)
1,369,620
$
853,051
(10,254)
1,530,000
(1,844,258)
—
914
(16,405)
(2,062)
510,986
1,050,682
(22,867)
1,837,692
(2,079,554)
88,656
2,669
(14,650)
(886)
861,742
(57,678)
679,527
621,849
$
348,869
330,658
679,527
$
132,273
198,385
330,658
125,373
35,865
1,094
5,135
$
$
$
$
— $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,293
144
27,286
29,651
6,016
5,194,955
4,325,642
869,294
$
67,523
$
20,026
$
4,124
$
6,393
$
10,817
$
8,831
931
$
— $
— $
— $
$
$
$
3,064,615
2,415,212
547,127
32,465
38,939
4,372
5,023
212,850
119,389
1,334
—
—
—
—
—
—
23,320
— $
$
(499) $
— $
(3,266) $
$
112
5,844
(338)
116
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-11
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business
Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Ameris”) is a financial holding company headquartered in Atlanta,
Georgia, and whose primary business is presently conducted by Ameris Bank, its wholly owned banking subsidiary (the
“Bank”). Through the Bank, the Company operates a full service banking business and offers a broad range of retail and
commercial banking services to its customers concentrated in select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina.
The Bank also engages in mortgage banking activities and SBA lending, and, as such, originates, acquires, sells and services
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans and SBA loans in the Southeast. The Bank has purchased residential mortgage
loan pools collateralized by properties located outside our Southeast markets, specifically in California, Washington and
Illinois. The Bank purchases consumer installment home improvement loans made to borrowers throughout the United States.
The Bank also originates, administers and services commercial insurance premium loans made to borrowers throughout the
United States. The Company and the Bank are subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and are
periodically examined by those regulatory agencies.
Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Acquisition Accounting
Acquisitions are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Purchased assets and assumed liabilities are
recorded at their estimated fair values as of the purchase date. Any identifiable intangible assets are also recorded at fair value.
When the consideration given is less than the fair value of the net assets received, the acquisition results in a “bargain purchase
gain.” If the consideration given exceeds the fair value of the net assets received, goodwill is recognized. Fair values are subject
to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of an acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair
values becomes available.
All identifiable intangible assets that are acquired in a business combination are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date.
Identifiable intangible assets are recognized separately if they arise from contractual or other legal rights or if they are separable
(i.e., capable of being sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged separately from the entity).
Purchased loans acquired in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date and carryover of
the seller's related allowance for loan losses is prohibited. When the loans have evidence of credit deterioration since
origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and
interest payments, the difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be
collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable difference. The Company must estimate expected cash flows at each
reporting date. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent
increases in expected cash flows result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior provisions and adjust
accretable discount if no prior provisions have been made or have been fully reversed. This increase in accretable discount will
have a positive impact on future interest income.
Transfer of financial assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over
transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the
right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and
the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before
their maturity.
F-12
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash items in process of collection,
amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for customer
loan and deposit transactions, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased.
The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve
requirement as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $109.7 million and $61.2 million, respectively, and was met by cash on
hand and balances held at the Federal Reserve Bank which are reported on the Company's consolidated balance sheets in cash
and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in banks, respectively.
Investment Securities
The Company classifies its debt securities in one of three categories: (i) trading, (ii) held to maturity or (iii) available for sale.
Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Held to maturity securities
are those securities for which the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other debt securities are
classified as available for sale. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, all debt securities were classified as available for sale.
Trading securities are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are recorded in earnings as a
component of other noninterest income. Held to maturity securities are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for
paydowns and amortization of purchase premium or accretion of purchase discount. Available for sale securities are carried at
fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related deferred tax effect, on available for sale securities are
excluded from earnings and are reported in other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity until
realized. Transfers of securities between categories are recorded at fair value at the date of transfer. Unrealized holding gains or
losses associated with transfers of securities from held to maturity to available for sale are recorded as a separate component of
shareholders’ equity. These unrealized holding gains or losses are amortized into income over the remaining life of the security
as an adjustment to the yield in a manner consistent with the amortization or accretion of the original purchase premium or
discount on the associated security.
The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the
interest method over the expected life of the securities. Realized gains and losses, determined on the basis of the cost of specific
securities sold, are included in earnings on the trade date. A decline in the market value of any available for sale or held to
maturity investment below cost that is deemed other than temporary establishes a new cost basis for the security. Other than
temporary impairment deemed to be credit related is charged to earnings. Other than temporary impairment attributed to non-
credit related factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
In determining whether other-than-temporary impairment losses exist, management considers (i) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer or
underlying collateral of the security and (iii) the Company’s intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the
issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Other Investments
Other investments include Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock. These investments do not have readily determinable fair
values due to restrictions placed on transferability and therefore are carried at cost. These investments are periodically evaluated
for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value or cost basis. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.
Also included in other investments are 57,611 Visa Class B restricted shares owned by the Bank with a carrying value of
approximately $242,000 as of December 31, 2019. These shares are transferable only under limited circumstances until they
can be converted into the publicly traded Visa Class A common shares. This conversion will not occur until the settlement of
certain litigation which will be indemnified by Visa members, including the Bank. Visa funded an escrow account from its
initial public offering to settle these litigation claims. Should this escrow account be insufficient to cover these litigation claims,
Visa is entitled to fund additional amounts to the escrow account by reducing each member bank’s Visa Class B conversion
ratio to unrestricted Visa Class A shares. As of December 31, 2019, the conversion ratio was 1.6228.
F-13
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the estimated fair value, as determined by outstanding commitments from third party investors
in the secondary market. Adjustments to reflect unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of mortgage
loans held for sale and realized gains and losses upon ultimate sale of the mortgage loans held for sale are classified as
mortgage banking activity in the consolidated statements of income. Adjustments to reflect unrealized gains and losses resulting
from changes in fair value of SBA loans held for sale and realized gains and losses upon ultimate sale of the SBA loans held for
sale are classified as gain on sale of SBA loans in the consolidated statements of income.
Servicing Rights
When mortgage and SBA loans are sold with servicing retained, servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the
income statement effect recorded in mortgage banking activity or gains on sales of SBA loans accordingly. Fair value is based
on market prices for comparable servicing contracts, when available or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that
calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. All classes of servicing assets are subsequently measured
using the amortization method which requires servicing rights to be amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and
over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying loans. The Company assumed the servicing of
certain indirect automobile loans in an acquisition. The servicing asset was recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition and
follows the amortization method.
Servicing fee income, which is reported on the income statement in mortgage banking activity for serviced mortgage loans and
other noninterest income for all other serviced loans, is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a
contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The
amortization of servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income. Servicing fees totaled $19.9 million, $4.5 million
and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Late fees and ancillary fees related to
loan servicing are not material.
Servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to carrying amount.
Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into strata based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan
type and investor type. Impairment is recognized for a particular stratum through a valuation allowance, to the extent that fair
value is less than the carrying amount. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists
for a particular stratum, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Changes in valuation
allowances related to servicing rights are reported in mortgage banking activity and other noninterest income on the income
statement. The fair values of servicing rights are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of changes in estimated and actual
prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
Loans
the accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when,
Loans, excluding purchased loans and residential mortgage purchased loan pools (“purchased loan pools”) are reported at their
outstanding principal balances less unearned income, net of deferred fees and origination costs. Interest income is accrued on
in
the outstanding principal balance. For all classes of loans,
management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to make payments as they become due, unless the loan is well secured and
in the process of collection. Interest income on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued and placed on nonaccrual status
at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well secured and in process of collection. Mortgage loans and
commercial loans are charged off to the extent principal or interest is deemed uncollectible. Consumer loans continue to accrue
interest until they are charged off, generally between 90 and 120 days past due, unless the loan is in the process of collection.
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are
collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. All interest accrued, but not collected for loans
that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off, is reversed against interest income. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is applied
against principal until the loans are returned to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and
interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
F-14
Purchased Loans
Purchased loans include loans acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions (“covered loans”) and other acquisitions (“purchased non-
covered loans”) and are initially recorded at fair value on the date of the purchase. Purchased loans that contain evidence of
credit deterioration (“purchased credit impaired loans”) on the date of purchase are carried at the net present value of expected
future proceeds. All other purchased loans are recorded at their initial fair value, adjusted for subsequent advances, pay downs,
amortization or accretion of any premium or discount on purchase, charge-offs and any other adjustment to carrying value.
There is no carryover of the seller’s allowance for loan losses. After acquisition, losses are recognized by recording a charge-off
of the loss and a corresponding provision expense.
In determining the initial fair value of purchased loans without evidence of credit deterioration at the date of acquisition,
management includes (i) no carryover of the seller's allowance for loan losses and (ii) an adjustment of the recorded investment
to reflect an appropriate market rate of interest, given the remaining term, risk profile and grade assigned to each loan. This
adjustment is accreted into earnings as a yield adjustment, using methods approximating the effective yield method, over the
remaining life of each loan.
Purchased credit impaired loans are accounted for individually. The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected
cash flows for each loan, and the expected cash flows in excess of the amount paid is recorded as interest income over the
remaining life of the loan (accretable yield). The excess of the loan’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows
is not recorded (nonaccretable difference).
Over the life of the loan, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than
the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recorded as a provision for loan losses. If the present value of expected cash flows is
greater than the carrying amount, it results in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior provisions and then
is recognized as part of future interest income through an increase in accretable yield.
Purchased Loan Pools
Purchased loan pools include groups of residential mortgage loans that were not acquired in bank acquisitions or FDIC-assisted
transactions. Purchased loan pools are reported at their outstanding principal balances plus purchase premiums, net of
accumulated amortization. Interest income is accrued on the outstanding principal balance. The accrual of interest on loans is
discontinued when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to make payments as they become due, unless the
loan is well secured and in the process of collection.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loan losses are charged
against the allowance when management believes the collection of a loan’s principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries are
credited to the allowance.
The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically
identified loans, as well as probable incurred losses in the balance of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is
evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of various risks in the loan
portfolio highlighted by historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of
specific problem loans, current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay, estimated value of any
underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that
are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance for loan losses evaluation does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that
are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. While management uses the best information available
to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic
conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s
allowance for loan losses and may require the Bank to make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about
information available to them at the time of their examinations.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component includes loans management considers
impaired and other loans or groups of loans that management has classified with higher risk characteristics. For such loans that
are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value or observable market
F-15
price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and
is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.
The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on non-
accruing, past due and other loans that management believes might be potentially impaired or warrant additional attention. The
Company segregates the loan portfolio by type of loan and utilizes this segregation in evaluating exposure to risks within the
portfolio. In addition, based on internal reviews and external reviews performed by independent loan reviewers and regulatory
authorities, the Company further segregates the loan portfolio by loan grades based on an assessment of risk for a particular
loan or group of loans. In establishing allowances, management considers historical loan loss experience but adjusts this data
with a significant emphasis on data such as risk ratings, current loan quality trends, current economic conditions and other
factors in the markets where the Company operates. Factors considered include, among others, current valuations of real estate
in their markets, unemployment rates, the effect of weather conditions on agricultural related entities and other significant local
economic events.
The Company has developed a methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses which is monitored
by the Company’s Chief Credit Officer. Procedures provide for the assignment of a risk rating for every loan included in the
total loan portfolio. Commercial insurance premium loans, overdraft protection loans and certain mortgage loans and consumer
loans serviced by outside processors are treated as pools for risk rating purposes. The risk rating schedule provides nine ratings
of which five ratings are classified as pass ratings and four ratings are classified as criticized ratings. Each risk rating is
assigned a percentage factor of historical losses, calculated by loan type, and adjusted for qualitative factors to be applied to the
balance of loans by risk rating and loan type, to determine the adequate amount of reserve. Many of the larger loans require an
annual review by an independent loan officer in the Company’s internal loan review department. Assigned risk ratings are
adjusted based on various factors including changes in borrower’s financial condition, the number of days past due and general
economic conditions. The calculation of the allowance for loan losses, including underlying data and assumptions, is reviewed
quarterly by the independent internal loan review department.
the allowance when management believes the collection of a loan’s principal
Loan losses are charged against
is
unlikely. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance. Consumer loans are charged-off in accordance with the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council’s (“FFIEC”) Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy.
Commercial loans are charged-off when they are deemed uncollectible, which usually involves a triggering event within the
collection effort. If the loan is collateral dependent, the loss is more easily identified and is charged-off when it is identified,
usually based upon receipt of an appraisal. However, when a loan has guarantor support, and the guarantor demonstrates
willingness and capacity to support the debt, the Company may carry the estimated loss as a reserve against the loan while
collection efforts with the guarantor are pursued. If, after collection efforts with the guarantor are complete, the deficiency is
still considered uncollectible, the loss is charged-off and any further collections are treated as recoveries. In all situations, when
a loan is downgraded to a loan risk rating of 9 (Loss per the regulatory guidance), the uncollectible portion is charged-off.
Loan Commitments and Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and standby letters of
credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before
considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Other premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation computed on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. In general, estimated lives for buildings are up to 40 years,
furniture and equipment useful lives range from three to 20 years and the lives of software and computer related equipment
range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the related lease, or the related assets,
whichever is shorter. Expenditures for major improvements of the Company’s premises and equipment are capitalized and
depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Minor repairs, maintenance and improvements are charged to operations as
incurred. When assets are sold or disposed of, their cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings.
Leases
The Company has entered into various operating leases for certain branch locations, ATM locations, loan production offices,
and corporate support services locations with terms extending through September 2029. Generally, these leases have initial
F-16
lease terms of ten years or less. Many of the leases have one or more lease renewal options. The exercise of lease renewal
options is at our sole discretion. The Company does not consider exercise of any lease renewal options reasonably certain.
Certain of our lease agreements contain early termination options. No renewal options or early termination options have been
included in the calculation of the operating right-of-use assets or operating lease liabilities. Certain of our lease agreements
provide for periodic adjustments to rental payments for inflation. At the commencement date of the lease, the Company
recognizes a lease liability at the present value of the lease payments not yet paid, discounted using the discount rate for the
lease or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. As the majority of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate,
the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate at the commencement date in determining the present value of lease
payments. The incremental borrowing rate is based on the term of the lease. Incremental borrowing rates on January 1, 2019
were used for operating leases that commenced prior to that date. At the commencement date, the company also recognizes a
right-of-use asset measured at (i) the initial measurement of the lease liability; (ii) any lease payments made to the lessor at or
before the commencement date less any lease incentives received; and (iii) any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee. Leases
with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. For these short-term leases, lease expense is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. At December 31, 2019, the Company had no leases classified as finance
leases.
FDIC Loss-Share Receivable/Payable
In connection with the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the Company has recorded an FDIC loss-share receivable to
reflect the indemnification provided by the FDIC. Since the indemnified items are covered loans and covered foreclosed assets,
which are initially measured at fair value, the FDIC loss-share receivable is also initially measured and recorded at fair value,
and is calculated by discounting the cash flows expected to be received from the FDIC. These cash flows are estimated by
multiplying estimated losses by the reimbursement rates as set forth in the loss-sharing agreements. The balance of the FDIC
loss-share receivable and the accretion (or amortization) thereof is adjusted periodically to reflect changes in expectations of
discounted cash flows, expense reimbursements under the loss-sharing agreements and other factors. The Company is accreting
(or amortizing) its FDIC loss-share receivable over the shorter of the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (ten
years for the single family loss-sharing agreements, and five years for the non-single family loss-sharing agreements) or the
remaining life of the indemnified asset.
Pursuant to the clawback provisions of the loss-sharing agreements for the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the
Company may be required to reimburse the FDIC should actual losses be less than certain thresholds established in each loss-
sharing agreement. The amount of the clawback provision for each acquisition is measured and recorded at fair value. It is
calculated as the difference between management’s estimated losses on covered loans and covered foreclosed assets and the
loss threshold contained in each loss-sharing agreement, multiplied by the applicable clawback provisions contained in each
loss-sharing agreement. This clawback amount, which is payable to the FDIC upon termination of the applicable loss-sharing
agreement, is then discounted back to net present value. To the extent that actual losses on covered loans and covered
foreclosed assets are less than estimated losses, the applicable clawback payable to the FDIC upon termination of the loss-
sharing agreements will increase. To the extent that actual losses on covered loans and covered foreclosed assets are more than
estimated losses, the applicable clawback payable to the FDIC upon termination of the loss-sharing agreements will decrease.
The balance of the FDIC clawback payable and the amortization thereof are adjusted periodically to reflect changes in expected
losses on covered assets and the impact of such changes on the clawback payable and other factors.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets purchased in business combinations. Goodwill is
required to be tested annually for impairment or whenever events occur that may indicate that the recoverability of the carrying
amount is not probable. In the event of an impairment, the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value is
charged to earnings. The Company performs its annual impairment testing of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year.
Intangible assets include core deposit premiums from various past bank acquisitions as well as intangible assets recorded in
connection with the USPF acquisition for insurance agent relationships, the "US Premium Finance" trade name and a non-
compete agreement.
Core deposit premiums acquired in various past bank acquisitions are based on the established value of acquired customer
deposits. The core deposit premium is initially recognized based on a valuation performed as of the acquisition date and is
amortized over an estimated useful life of seven to ten years.
F-17
The insurance agent relationships, the "US Premium Finance" trade name and non-compete agreement intangible assets
acquired in the USPF acquisition are based on the established values as of the acquisition date and are being amortized over
estimated useful lives of eight years, seven years and three years, respectively.
Amortization periods for intangible assets are reviewed annually in connection with the annual impairment testing of goodwill.
Cash Value of Bank Owned Life Insurance
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain officers. The life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be
realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or
other amounts due that are probable at settlement.
Other Real Estate Owned
Foreclosed assets acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less
estimated cost to sell. Any write-down to fair value at the time of transfer to foreclosed assets is charged to the allowance for
loan losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the
lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Costs of improvements are capitalized up to the fair value of the
property, whereas costs relating to holding foreclosed assets and subsequent adjustments to the value are charged to operations.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability method. Under this method, the net deferred tax
asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the
various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
In the event the future tax consequences of differences between the financial reporting bases and the tax bases of the assets and
liabilities results in deferred tax assets, an evaluation of the probability of being able to realize the future benefits indicated by
such assets is required. A valuation allowance is provided for the portion of the deferred tax asset when it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets,
management considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning
strategies.
The Company currently evaluates income tax positions judged to be uncertain. A loss contingency reserve is accrued if it is
probable that the tax position will be challenged with a tax examination being presumed to occur, it is probable that the future
resolution of the challenge will confirm that a loss has been incurred, and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in other noninterest expenses.
Loss Contingencies
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities
when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock compensation plans using a fair value based method whereby compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the
vesting period. The Company recorded approximately $3.4 million, $6.2 million, and $3.3 million of share-based compensation
cost in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recognized forfeitures as they occur.
Treasury Stock
The Company’s repurchases of shares of its common stock are recorded at cost as treasury stock and result in a reduction of
shareholders' equity.
F-18
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are computed by
dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding and the effect of the issuance of potential common shares that are dilutive. Potential common shares consist of
stock options and restricted shares for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and are determined using the
treasury stock method. The Company has determined that its outstanding non-vested stock awards are participating securities,
and all dividends on these awards are paid similar to other dividends.
Presented below is a summary of the components used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share.
(dollars in thousands, shares in thousands)
Net income available to common shareholders
Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
161,441
$
121,027
$
73,548
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive stock options
Effect of dilutive restricted stock awards
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted
earnings per share
58,462
69
83
58,614
43,142
6
100
43,248
36,828
62
254
37,144
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company has not excluded any potential common shares with
strike prices that would cause them to be anti-dilutive.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The goal of the Company’s interest rate risk management process is to minimize the volatility in the net interest margin caused
by changes in interest rates. Derivative instruments are used to hedge certain assets or liabilities as a part of this process. The
Company is required to recognize certain contracts and commitments as derivatives when the characteristics of those contracts
and commitments meet the definition of a derivative. All derivative instruments are required to be carried at fair value on the
balance sheet.
The Company’s hedging strategies include utilizing an interest rate swap classified as a cash flow hedge. Cash flow hedges
relate to converting the variability in future interest payments on a floating rate liability to fixed payments. When effective, the
fair value of cash flow hedges is carried as a component of other comprehensive income rather than an income statement item.
The Company had a cash flow hedge with notional amount of $37.1 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018 for the purpose of
converting the variable rate on certain junior subordinated debentures to a fixed rate. The fair value of this instrument amounted
to a liability of $187,000 as of December 31, 2019 and an asset of $102,000 as of December 31, 2018. No material hedge
ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges was recognized in the statement of income. All components of each derivative’s gain or
loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The interest rate swap matures in September 2020.
Revenue Recognition
With the exception of gains/losses on the sale of OREO discussed below, revenue from contracts with customers ("ASC 606
Revenue") is recorded in the service charges on deposit accounts category and the other service charges, commissions and fees
category in the Company's consolidated statement of income as part of noninterest income. Substantially all ASC 606 Revenue
is recorded in the Banking Division.
Debit Card Interchange Fees - The Company earns debit card interchange fees from debit cardholder transactions conducted
through various payment networks.
Interchange fees from debit cardholders transactions represent a percentage of the
underlying transaction amount and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the
debit cardholder.
Overdraft Fees - Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs.
Other Service Charges on Deposit Accounts - Other service charges on deposit accounts include both transaction-based fees
and account maintenance fees. Transaction based fees, which include wire transfer fees, stop payment charges, statement
F-19
rendering, and automated clearing house ("ACH")
fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the
point in time the Company fulfills the customer's request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly
maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance
obligation.
ATM Fees - Transaction-based ATM usage fees are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point at
which the Company satisfies the performance obligation.
Gains on the Sale of OREO - The net gains and losses on sales of OREO are recorded in credit resolution related expenses in
the Company's consolidated statement of income. The Company records a gain or loss from the sale of OREO when control of
the property transfers to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When the Company finances the
sale of OREO to the buyer, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the
contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is
derecognized and the gain on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. The Company does not
provide financing for the sale of OREO unless these criteria are met and the OREO can be derecognized.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives
The Company maintains a risk management program to manage interest rate risk and pricing risk associated with its mortgage
lending activities. Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward
commitments for the future delivery of these mortgage loans are accounted for as free standing derivatives. The fair value of the
interest rate lock is recorded at the time the commitment to fund the mortgage loan is executed and is adjusted for the expected
exercise of the commitment before the loan is funded. In order to hedge the change in interest rates resulting from its
commitments to fund the loans, the Company enters into forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans when
interest rate locks are entered into. Fair values of these mortgage derivatives are estimated based on changes in mortgage
interest rates from the date the interest on the loan is locked. Changes in the fair values of these derivatives are included in
mortgage banking activity in the Company's consolidated statement of income. The fair value of these instruments amounted to
an asset of approximately $7.8 million and $2.5 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and a derivative liability
of approximately $4.5 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Comprehensive Income
The Company’s comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the net unrealized holding gains and losses of
securities available for sale, unrealized gain or loss on the effective portion of cash flow hedges and the realized gain or loss
recognized due to the sale or unwind of cash flow hedges prior to their contractual maturity date. These amounts are carried in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and are presented net
of taxes.
Fair Value Measures
Fair values of assets and liabilities are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully
disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest
rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in
assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect these estimates.
Operating Segments
The Company has five reportable segments, the Banking Division, the Retail Mortgage Division, the Warehouse Lending
Division, the SBA Division and the Premium Finance Division. The Banking Division derives its revenues from the delivery of
full service financial services to include commercial loans, consumer loans and deposit accounts. The Retail Mortgage Division
derives its revenues from the origination, sales and servicing of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. The Warehouse
Lending Division derives its revenues from the origination and servicing of warehouse lines to other businesses that are secured
by underlying one-to-four family residential mortgage loans and residential mortgage servicing rights. The SBA Division
derives its revenues from the origination, sales and servicing of SBA loans. The Premium Finance Division derives its revenues
from the origination and servicing of commercial insurance premium finance loans.
The Banking, Retail Mortgage, Warehouse Lending, SBA and Premium Finance Divisions are managed as separate business
units because of the different products and services they provide. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources
based on profit or loss from operations. There are no material intersegment sales or transfers.
F-20
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2019
ASU 2016-02 – Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 amends the existing standards for lease accounting
effectively requiring that most leases be carried on the balance sheets of the related lessees by requiring them to recognize a
right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. ASU 2016-02 includes qualitative and quantitative disclosure
requirements intended to provide greater insight into the nature of an entity’s leasing activities. The standard may be adopted
using a modified retrospective transition method with a cumulative effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period
in which it is adopted. Alternatively, the standard may be adopted using an optional transition method where initial application
of the provisions of ASU 2016-02 are applied as the date of adoption, resulting in no adjustment to amounts reported in prior
periods. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within
those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 during the first quarter of 2019 and elected the optional transition
method. The Company also elected the package of practical expedients provided in the guidance which permits the Company to
not reassess under the new standard the prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs.
The Company also elected the hindsight practical expedient to determine lease term and in assessing impairment of the
Company's right-of-use asset. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of a right-of-use asset of $27.3 million,
a lease liability of $29.7 million and a cumulative effect decrease to retained earnings of $276,000. The right-of-use asset and
lease liability are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets in other assets and other liabilities, respectively.
Accounting Standards Pending Adoption
ASU 2019-12 – Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes ("ASU 2019-12"). ASU 2019-12
simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain technical exceptions. ASU 2019-12 also clarifies and amends
the accounting for income taxes in certain areas including, among others: (i) franchise taxes that are partially based on income;
(ii) whether step ups in the tax basis of goodwill should be considered part of the acquisition to which it related or recognized as
a separate transaction; and (iii) requiring the effect of an enacted change in tax laws or rates to be reflected in the annual
effective tax rate computation in the interim period that includes the enactment date. The Company expects to apply the
amendments in this update on a modified retrospective basis for the provision related to franchise taxes and prospectively for all
other amendments. ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet,
consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income, consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity and consolidated
statement of cash flows, but it is not expected to have a material impact.
ASU 2018-15 – Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for
Implementation Costs incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract ("ASU 2018-15"). ASU
2018-15 requires that application development stage implementation costs incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement
("CCA") that are service contracts be capitalized and amortized over the term of the hosting arrangement including renewal
option terms if the customer entity is reasonably certain to exercise the option. Costs incurred in the preliminary project and
post-implementation stages are expensed as incurred. Training costs and certain data conversion costs also cannot be
capitalized for a CCA that is a service contract. Amortization expense of capitalized implementation costs will be presented in
the same income statement caption as the CCA fees. Similarly, capitalized implementation costs will be presented in the same
balance sheet caption as any prepaid CCA fees and cash flows from capitalized implementation costs will be classified in the
statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments made for the CCA fees. The requirements of ASU 2018-15 should be
applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the adoption date. ASU 2018-15 is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of
income and comprehensive income, consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity and consolidated statement of cash flows,
but it is not expected to have a material impact.
ASU 2018-13 – Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for
Fair Value Measurement ("ASU 2018-13). ASU 2018-13 changes fair value measurement disclosure requirements by
removing certain requirements, modifying certain requirements and adding certain new requirements. Disclosure requirements
removed include the following:
transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for determining
when transfers between any of the three levels have occurred; the valuation processes for Level 3 measurements; and the
changes in unrealized gains or losses presented in earnings for Level 3 instruments held at end of the reporting period.
Disclosure requirements that have been modified include the following:
for investments in certain entities that calculate net
asset value, an entity is required to disclose the timing of liquidation of an investee's assets and the date when restrictions from
redemption might lapse only if the investee has communicated the timing to the entity or announced the timing publicly; and
clarification that the Level 3 measurement uncertainty disclosure should communicate information about the uncertainty at the
the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the
balance sheet date. New disclosure requirements include the following:
F-21
period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 instruments held at the end of the reporting period; and
the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used for Level 3 measurements or disclosure of other
quantitative information in place of the weighted average to the extent that it would be a more reasonable and rational method
to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs. ASU 2018-13 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on
the Company’s fair value measurement disclosures, but it is not expected to have a material impact.
ASU 2017-04 – Intangibles: Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU
2017-04 eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The annual,
or interim, goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An
impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value;
however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. In addition, the
income tax effects of tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit should be considered when
measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. ASU 2017-04 also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit
with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to
perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The
standard must be adopted using a prospective basis and the nature and reason for the change in accounting principle should be
disclosed upon transition. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and disclosures,
but it is not expected to have a material impact.
ASU 2016-13 – Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and
certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace the current incurred
loss approach with an expected loss model, referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model. The new standard
will apply to financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance-sheet credit
exposures, which include, but are not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments and financial
guarantees. ASU 2016-13 simplifies the accounting for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans and expands the
disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease
losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality
indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2018. Upon adoption, ASU 2016-13 provides for a modified retrospective transition by means of a cumulative effect
adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is effective.
The Company is finalizing its evaluation of the adoption of this ASU. The Company to date has selected the software vendor
of choice for implementation, sourced and tested required data from the Company’s loan systems, tested data feeds to the
model, contracted for and received results from independent third parties of model validation and internal audit of the CECL
model and process, determined appropriate segmentations of its portfolio, selected a preliminary forecast period for reasonable
and supportable forecasts and reversion methodology, and has performed parallel runs of the model. The Company is currently
finalizing its assessment of current and forecasted macroeconomic factors and assumptions and testing and finalization of
internal controls. The Company currently estimates the allowance for loan losses will increase to a range of $85 million and
$120 million and is inclusive of the gross up of the allowance for expected credit losses on purchased credit deteriorated assets.
In addition, the Company expects to recognize a liability for unfunded commitments between $10 million and $20 million upon
adoption. The Company will finalize the adoption during the first quarter of 2020.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts have been made to conform with the current year presentations.
NOTE 2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
In accounting for business combinations, the Company uses the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805,
Business Combinations. Under the acquisition method of accounting, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration
exchanged are recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values. Any identifiable intangible assets that are acquired in a
business combination are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date.
Identifiable intangible assets are recognized
separately if they arise from contractual or other legal rights or if they are separable (i.e., capable of being sold, transferred,
If the consideration given exceeds the fair value of the net assets
licensed, rented or exchanged separately from the entity).
F-22
received, goodwill is recognized. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities is a complicated process involving
significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. Fair values are subject to
refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair
values becomes available. In addition, management will assess and record the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities
resulting from differences in the carrying value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities for financial reporting purposes and
their basis for income tax purposes, including acquired net operating loss carryforwards and other acquired assets with built-in
losses that are expected to be settled or otherwise recovered in future periods where the realization of such benefits would be
subject to applicable limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Fidelity Southern Corporation
On July 1, 2019, the Company completed its acquisition of Fidelity Southern Corporation ("Fidelity"), a bank holding company
headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Fidelity was merged with and into the Company,
with Ameris as the surviving entity in the merger, and Fidelity's wholly owned banking subsidiary, Fidelity Bank, was merged
with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. The acquisition expanded the Company's existing market presence in Georgia
and Florida, as Fidelity Bank had a total of 62 branches at the time of closing, 46 of which were located in Georgia and 16 of
which were located in Florida. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Fidelity's shareholders received 0.80 shares of Ameris
common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock they previously held. As a result, the Company issued 22,181,522
shares of its common stock at a fair value of $869.3 million to Fidelity's shareholders as merger consideration.
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Fidelity as of July 1, 2019, and their fair value
estimates. The fair value estimates were subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition for new
information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The Company continues its evaluation
of the facts and circumstances as of July 1, 2019, to assign fair values to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which could
result in further adjustments to the fair values presented below. At December 31, 2019, management continues to evaluate fair
value adjustments related to loans, premises, intangibles, interest-bearing deposits, other borrowings, subordinated deferrable
interest debentures and deferred taxes.
F-23
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
Investment securities
Other investments
Loans held for sale
Loans
Less allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
Other real estate owned
Premises and equipment
Other intangible assets, net
Cash value of bank owned life insurance
Deferred income taxes, net
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Deferred tax liability, net
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Net identifiable assets acquired over (under) liabilities
assumed
Goodwill
Net assets acquired over liabilities assumed
Consideration:
Ameris Bancorp common shares issued
Price per share of the Company's common stock
Company common stock issued
Cash exchanged for shares
Fair value of total consideration transferred
____________________________________________________________
Explanation of fair value adjustments
$
$
$
$
$
As Recorded
by Fidelity
Initial
Fair Value
Adjustments
Subsequent
Adjustments
As Recorded
by Ameris
$
26,264
$
217,936
299,341
7,449
328,657
3,587,412
(31,245)
3,556,167
7,605
93,662
10,670
72,328
104
157,863
—
—
$
(1,444) (a)
—
(1,290) (b)
(79,002) (c)
31,245 (d)
(47,757)
(427) (e)
11,407 (f)
39,940 (g)
—
(104) (h)
998 (i)
—
—
—
—
—
$
26,264
217,936
297,897
7,449
327,367
3,235 (o)
3,511,645
—
3,235
—
(2,418) (p)
—
—
—
(13,014) (q)
—
3,511,645
7,178
102,651
50,610
72,328
—
145,847
$
4,778,046
$
1,323
$
(12,197)
$
4,767,172
$
1,301,829
$
—
$
$
1,301,829
—
—
—
—
—
—
8,791 (r)
(839) (s)
7,952
(20,149)
20,149
2,741,494
4,043,323
22,345
151,632
36,718
9,612
64,726
4,328,356
438,816
430,497
869,313
$
—
$
2,740,552
4,042,381
22,345
149,367
46,393
12,222
65,027
942 (j)
942
—
2,265 (k)
(9,675) (l)
(11,401) (m)
538 (n)
4,337,735
(17,331)
440,311
—
440,311
$
18,654
410,348
429,002
22,181,522
39.19
869,294
19
869,313
(a) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments of the portfolio of investment securities as of the acquisition date.
(b) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired loans held for sale.
(c) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio, net of
the reversal of Fidelity's unamortized accounting adjustments from Fidelity's prior acquisitions, loan premiums, loan
discounts, deferred loan origination costs and deferred loan origination fees.
(d) Adjustment reflects the elimination of Fidelity's allowance for loan losses.
(e) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired OREO portfolio.
(f) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired premises and
equipment.
F-24
(g) Adjustment reflects the recording of core deposit intangible on the acquired core deposit accounts, net of reversal of
Fidelity's remaining intangible assets from its past acquisitions.
(h) Adjustment reflects the reclassification of Fidelity's deferred tax asset against the deferred tax liability.
(i) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to other assets.
(j) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired deposits.
(k) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to the other borrowings at the acquisition date, net of reversal of
Fidelity's unamortized deferred issuance costs.
(l) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to the subordinated deferrable interest debentures at the acquisition date.
(m) Adjustment reflects the deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired assets and assumed
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes and reclassification of
Fidelity's deferred tax asset against the deferred tax liability.
(n) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired other liabilities.
(o) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments of the acquired loan portfolio.
(p) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments to premises and equipment.
(q) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments to other assets and includes a reclassification of
deferred income taxes to current income taxes.
(r) Adjustment reflects additional recording of deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired assets
and assumed liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes and includes a
reclassification of deferred income taxes to current income taxes.
(s) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments to other liabilities.
Goodwill of $430.5 million, which is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded in
the Fidelity acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
In the acquisition, the Company purchased $3.51 billion of loans at fair value, net of $75.8 million, or 2.11%, estimated
discount to the acquired carrying value. Of the total loans acquired, management identified $120.7 million that were considered
to be credit impaired and are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually
required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the
loans as of the acquisition date for purchased credit impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payments have
been adjusted for estimated prepayments.
(dollars in thousands)
Contractually required principal and interest
Non-accretable difference
Cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable yield
Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired
The following table presents the acquired loan data for the Fidelity acquisition.
(dollars in thousands)
Fair Value of
Acquired Loans at
Acquisition Date
Gross Contractual
Amounts Receivable
at Acquisition Date
$
$
191,534
(23,668)
167,866
(47,173)
120,693
Estimate at
Acquisition Date of
Contractual Cash
Flows Not Expected
to be Collected
Acquired receivables subject to ASC 310-30
Acquired receivables not subject to ASC 310-30
$
$
120,693
3,390,952
$
$
191,534
4,217,890
$
$
23,668
32,466
F-25
Hamilton State Bancshares, Inc.
On June 29, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Hamilton State Bancshares, Inc. ("Hamilton"), a bank holding
company headquartered in Hoschton, Georgia. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Hamilton was merged with and into the
Company, with Ameris as the surviving entity in the merger, and Hamilton's wholly owned banking subsidiary, Hamilton State
Bank, was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. The acquisition expanded the Company's existing market
presence, as Hamilton State Bank had a total of 28 full-service branches located in Atlanta, Georgia and the surrounding area,
as well as in Gainesville, Georgia. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Hamilton's shareholders received 0.16 shares of
Ameris common stock and $0.93 in cash for each share of Hamilton voting common stock or nonvoting common stock they
previously held. As a result, the Company issued 6,548,385 common shares at a fair value of $349.4 million and paid $47.8
million in cash to Hamilton's shareholders as merger consideration.
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities of Hamilton assumed as of June 29, 2018 and their fair value
estimates. The fair value estimates were subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition for
new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The Company finalized its fair
value adjustments during the second quarter of 2019.
F-26
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
Time deposits in other banks
Investment securities
Other investments
Loans
Less allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
Other real estate owned
Premises and equipment
Other intangible assets, net
Cash value of bank owned life insurance
Deferred income taxes, net
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debenture
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Net identifiable assets acquired over (under) liabilities
assumed
Goodwill
Net assets acquired over liabilities assumed
Consideration:
Ameris Bancorp common shares issued
Price per share of the Company's common stock
Company common stock issued
Cash exchanged for shares
Fair value of total consideration transferred
____________________________________________________________
Explanation of fair value adjustments
$
$
$
$
$
As Recorded
by Hamilton
Initial
Fair Value
Adjustments
Subsequent
Adjustments
As Recorded
by Ameris
$
14,405
$
102,156
11,558
288,206
2,094
1,314,264
(11,183)
1,303,081
847
27,483
18,755
4,454
12,445
13,053
—
—
—
(2,376) (a)
—
(15,528) (b)
11,183 (c)
(4,345)
—
—
(2,755) (d)
—
(6,308) (e)
—
$
(478) (j)
$
—
—
—
—
13,927
102,156
11,558
285,830
2,094
(5,550) (k)
1,293,186
—
(5,550)
—
1,488 (l)
7,610 (m)
—
3,942 (n)
(2,098) (o)
—
1,293,186
847
28,971
23,610
4,454
10,079
10,955
$
1,798,537
$
(15,784)
$
4,914
$
1,787,667
$
381,039
$
—
—
$
381,039
1,201,324
1,582,363
10,687
3,093
10,460
1,606,603
(1,896) (f)
(1,896)
(66) (g)
(658) (h)
2,391 (i)
(229)
4,783 (p)
4,783
286 (q)
(143) (r)
—
4,926
191,934
—
191,934
$
(15,555)
220,713
205,158
$
(12)
55
43
$
1,204,211
1,585,250
10,907
2,292
12,851
1,611,300
176,367
220,768
397,135
6,548,385
53.35
349,356
47,779
397,135
(a) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments of the portfolio of investment securities as of the acquisition date.
(b) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio, net of
the reversal of Hamilton's unamortized accounting adjustments from their prior acquisitions, loan premiums, loan
discounts, deferred loan origination costs and deferred loan origination fees.
(c) Adjustment reflects the elimination of Hamilton's allowance for loan losses.
(d) Adjustment reflects the recording of core deposit intangible on the acquired core deposit accounts, net of reversal of
Hamilton's remaining intangible assets from its past acquisitions.
(e) Adjustment reflects the deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired assets and assumed
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
(f) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired deposits.
(g) Adjustment reflects the reversal of Hamilton's unamortized accounting adjustments for other borrowings from its past
acquisitions.
F-27
(h) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to the subordinated deferrable interest debenture at the acquisition date.
(i) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to the FDIC loss-share clawback liability included in other liabilities.
(j) Subsequent to acquisition, cash and due from banks were adjusted for Hamilton reconciling items.
(k) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments to the acquired loan portfolio.
(l) Adjustment reflects the recording of fair value adjustment to premises and equipment.
(m) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments to the core deposit intangible on the acquired core
deposit accounts.
(n) Adjustment reflects additional recording of deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired assets
and assumed liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
(o) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to other assets.
(p) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments on the acquired deposits.
(q) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to other borrowings.
(r) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments to the subordinated deferrable interest debenture.
Goodwill of $220.8 million, which is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded in
the Hamilton acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is not expected to
be deductible for tax purposes.
In the acquisition, the Company purchased $1.29 billion of loans at fair value, net of $21.1 million, or 1.60%, estimated
discount to the acquired carrying value. Of the total loans acquired, management identified $18.6 million that were considered
to be credit impaired and are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually
required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the
loans as of the acquisition date for purchased credit impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payments have
been adjusted for estimated prepayments.
(dollars in thousands)
Contractually required principal and interest
Non-accretable difference
Cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable yield
Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired
$
$
21,223
(1,840)
19,383
(794)
18,589
The following table presents the acquired loan data for the Hamilton acquisition.
(dollars in thousands)
Fair Value of
Acquired Loans at
Acquisition Date
Gross Contractual
Amounts Receivable
at Acquisition Date
Estimate at
Acquisition Date of
Contractual Cash
Flows Not Expected
to be Collected
Acquired receivables subject to ASC 310-30
Acquired receivables not subject to ASC 310-30
$
$
18,589
1,274,597
$
$
21,223
1,441,534
$
$
1,840
5,104
F-28
Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation
On May 25, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation ("Atlantic"), a bank holding
company headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Atlantic was merged with and into the
Company, with Ameris as the surviving entity in the merger, and Atlantic's wholly owned banking subsidiary, Atlantic Coast
Bank, was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. The acquisition expanded the Company's existing market
presence, as Atlantic Coast Bank had a total of 12 full-service branches located in Jacksonville and Jacksonville Beach, Duval
County, Florida, Waycross, Georgia and Douglas, Georgia. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Atlantic's shareholders
received 0.17 shares of Ameris common stock and $1.39 in cash for each share of Atlantic common stock they previously held.
As a result, the Company issued 2,631,520 common shares at a fair value of $147.8 million and paid $21.5 million in cash to
Atlantic's shareholders as merger consideration.
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities of Atlantic assumed as of May 25, 2018 and their fair value
estimates. The fair value estimates were subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition for
new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The Company finalized its fair
value adjustments during the second quarter of 2019.
As Recorded
by Atlantic
Initial
Fair Value
Adjustments
Subsequent
Adjustments
As Recorded
by Ameris
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
Investment securities
Other investments
Loans held for sale
Loans
Less allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
Other real estate owned
Premises and equipment
Other intangible assets, net
Cash value of bank owned life insurance
Deferred income taxes, net
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Other borrowings
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Net identifiable assets acquired over (under) liabilities
assumed
Goodwill
Net assets acquired over liabilities assumed
Consideration:
Ameris Bancorp common shares issued
Price per share of the Company's common stock
Company common stock issued
Cash exchanged for shares
Fair value of total consideration transferred
882,287
$
(7,389)
$
121
69,761
$
—
—
$
$
(554) (i)
1,025 (p)
—
—
—
—
—
$
3,990
22,149
35,126
9,576
358
(2,478) (k)
755,704
—
(2,478)
—
(161) (l)
1,551 (m)
—
1,220 (n)
(11) (o)
1,025
—
(1,922) (q)
(897)
1,018
(1,018)
—
755,704
1,041
10,735
7,488
18,182
7,711
2,959
875,019
69,761
515,406
585,167
204,475
6,432
796,074
78,945
90,342
$
—
$
169,287
$
3,990
$
22,149
35,186
9,576
358
777,605
(8,573)
769,032
1,837
12,591
—
18,182
5,782
3,604
$
—
—
(60) (a)
—
—
(19,423) (b)
8,573 (c)
(10,850)
(796) (d)
(1,695) (e)
5,937 (f)
—
709 (g)
(634) (h)
(554)
—
(13) (j)
(567)
(6,822)
91,360
84,538
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
514,935
584,696
204,475
8,367
797,538
84,749
—
84,749
$
2,631,520
56.15
147,760
21,527
169,287
F-29
____________________________________________________________
Explanation of fair value adjustments
(a.) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments of the portfolio of investment securities as of the acquisition date.
(b.) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio, net of
the reversal of Atlantic's unamortized accounting adjustments from loan premiums, loan discounts, deferred loan
origination costs and deferred loan origination fees.
(c.) Adjustment reflects the elimination of Atlantic's allowance for loan losses.
(d.) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired OREO portfolio.
(e.) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired premises and
equipment.
(f.) Adjustment reflects the recording of core deposit intangible on the acquired core deposit accounts.
(g.) Adjustment reflects the deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired assets and assumed
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
(h.) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired other assets.
(i.) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired deposits.
(j.) Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company's evaluation of the acquired other liabilities.
(k.) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments of the acquired loan portfolio.
(l.) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustment to premises and equipment.
(m.) Adjustment reflects additional recording of fair value adjustments to the core deposit intangible on the acquired core
deposit accounts.
(n.) Adjustment reflects additional recording of deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired assets
and assumed liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
(o.) Adjustment reflects additional fair value adjustments on acquired other assets.
(p.) Adjustment reflects additional fair value adjustments on the acquired deposits.
(q.) Adjustment reflects additional fair value adjustments on acquired other liabilities.
Goodwill of $90.3 million, which is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded in
the Atlantic acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
In the acquisition, the Company purchased $755.7 million of loans at fair value, net of $21.9 million, or 2.82%, estimated
discount to the acquired carrying value. Of the total loans acquired, management identified $10.8 million that were considered
to be credit impaired and are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually
required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the
loans as of the acquisition date for purchased credit impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payments have
been adjusted for estimated prepayments.
(dollars in thousands)
Contractually required principal and interest
Non-accretable difference
Cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable yield
Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired
$
$
16,077
(4,115)
11,962
(1,199)
10,763
The following table presents the acquired loan data for the Atlantic acquisition.
(dollars in thousands)
Fair Value of
Acquired Loans at
Acquisition Date
Gross Contractual
Amounts Receivable
at Acquisition Date
Estimate at
Acquisition Date of
Contractual Cash
Flows Not Expected
to be Collected
Acquired receivables subject to ASC 310-30
Acquired receivables not subject to ASC 310-30
$
$
10,763
744,941
$
$
16,077
1,041,768
$
$
4,115
—
F-30
US Premium Finance Holding Company
On January 31, 2018, the Company closed on the purchase of the final 70% of the outstanding shares of common stock of
USPF, completing its acquisition of USPF and making USPF a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Through a series of
three acquisition transactions that closed on January 18, 2017, January 3, 2018 and January 31, 2018, the Company issued a
total of 1,073,158 shares of its common stock at a fair value of $55.9 million and paid $21.4 million in cash to the former
shareholders of USPF. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 25, 2018 under which Company
purchased the final 70% of the outstanding shares of common stock of USPF, the selling shareholders of USPF could receive
additional cash payments aggregating up to $5.8 million based on the achievement by the Company's premium finance division
of certain income targets, between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. The total contingent consideration paid was $1.2 million
based on results achieved through the applicable measurement dates. As of the January 31, 2018 acquisition date, the present
value of the contingent earn-out consideration expected to be paid was $5.7 million. Including the fair value of the Company's
common stock issued, cash paid and the present value of the contingent earn-out consideration expected to be paid, the
aggregate purchase price of USPF amounted to $83.0 million.
Prior to the January 31, 2018 completion of the acquisition, the Company's 30% investment in USPF was carried at its $23.9
million original cost basis. Once the acquisition was completed, the $83.0 million aggregate purchase price equaled the fair
value of USPF which was determined utilizing the incremental projected earnings. Accordingly, no gain or loss was recorded
by the Company in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income as a result of remeasuring to fair value the
prior minority equity investment in USPF held by the Company immediately before the business combination was completed.
During the first quarter of 2019, the Company finalized its allocation of the purchase price to USPF's assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values as of January 31, 2018. The assets acquired include only identifiable
intangible assets related to insurance agent relationships that lead to referral of insurance premium finance loans to USPF, the
"US Premium Finance" trade name and a non-compete agreement with a former USPF shareholder.
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of USPF as of January 31, 2018, and their fair value
estimates.
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Intangible asset - insurance agent relationships
Intangible asset - US Premium Finance trade name
Intangible asset - non-compete agreement
Total assets
Liabilities
Deferred tax liability
Total liabilities
Net identifiable assets acquired over liabilities assumed
Goodwill
Net assets acquired over liabilities assumed
Consideration:
Ameris Bancorp common shares issued
Price per share of the Company's common stock
(weighted average)
Company common stock issued
Cash exchanged for shares
Present value of contingent earn-out consideration
expected to be paid
Fair value of total consideration transferred
____________________________________________________________
Explanation of fair value adjustments
As Recorded
by USPF
Initial
Fair Value
Adjustments
Subsequent
Adjustments
As Recorded
by Ameris
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
— $
20,000 (a)
$
2,351 (e)
$
22,351
—
—
1,136 (b)
178 (c)
(42) (f)
(16) (g)
— $
21,314
$
2,293
— $
5,492 (d)
(368) (h)
—
—
—
— $
5,492
15,822
67,159
82,981
(368)
2,661
(2,661)
—
$
1,094
162
23,607
5,124
5,124
18,483
64,498
82,981
$
$
$
1,073,158
52.047
55,855
21,421
5,705
82,981
(a) Adjustment reflects the recording of the fair value of the insurance agent relationships intangible.
(b) Adjustment reflect the recording of the fair value of the trade name intangible.
(c) Adjustment reflects the recording of the fair value of the non-compete agreement intangible.
F-31
(d) Adjustment reflects the deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired intangible assets for
financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
(e) Adjustment reflects additional fair value adjustment for the insurance agent relationships intangible.
(f) Adjustment reflects additional fair value adjustment for the trade name intangible.
(g) Adjustment reflects additional fair value adjustment for the non-compete agreement intangible.
(h) Adjustment reflects additional recording of deferred taxes on the differences in the carrying values of acquired
intangible assets for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
Goodwill of $64.5 million, which is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded in
the USPF acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
During the second quarter of 2018, the Company recorded $2.0 million in other noninterest income in the consolidated
statements of income to reflect a decrease in the estimated contingent consideration liability. During the fourth quarter of 2018,
the Company recorded $2.5 million in other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income to reflect a further
decrease in the estimated contingent consideration liability. These decreases in the estimated contingent consideration liability
were based on projected results of the premium finance division for the entire measurement period from January 1, 2018
through June 30, 2019.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The results of operations of Fidelity, Hamilton, Atlantic and USPF subsequent to the respective acquisition dates are included in
the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
The following unaudited pro forma information reflects the Company’s estimated consolidated results of operations as if the
Fidelity, Hamilton, Atlantic and USPF acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2017, unadjusted for potential cost savings.
Merger and conversion charges are not included in the pro forma information below.
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net interest income and noninterest income
Net income
Net income available to common shareholders
Income per common share available to common shareholders – basic
Income per common share available to common shareholders – diluted
Average number of shares outstanding, basic
Average number of shares outstanding, diluted
$
$
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31,
2019
828,612
228,798
228,798
3.29
3.29
69,462
69,614
$
$
$
$
$
2018
803,281 $
196,352 $
196,352 $
2.82 $
2.82 $
69,642
69,748
2017
747,700
138,359
138,359
2.00
1.99
69,140
69,456
F-32
NOTE 3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale along with gross unrealized gains and losses are
summarized as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2019
U.S. government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
SBA pool securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Total debt securities
December 31, 2018
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
SBA pool securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Total debt securities
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
$
$
$
$
22,246
102,952
51,720
73,704
1,129,816
1,380,438
149,670
67,123
79,410
902,773
1,198,976
$
$
$
$
116
2,310
1,281
617
19,937
24,261
1,367
718
183
3,989
6,257
$
$
$
$
— $
(2)
(2)
(409)
(883)
(1,296) $
(304) $
(527)
(1,789)
(10,190)
(12,810) $
22,362
105,260
52,999
73,912
1,148,870
1,403,403
150,733
67,314
77,804
896,572
1,192,423
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of securities aggregated by category and length
of time that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2019
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
SBA pool securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
Estimated
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
$
803
2,573
28,521
99,279
(2) $
(2)
(285)
(416)
— $
—
4,825
52,326
$
— $
—
(124)
(467)
803
2,573
33,346
151,605
(2)
(2)
(409)
(883)
Total debt securities
$
131,176
$
(705) $
57,151
$
(591) $
188,327
$
(1,296)
December 31, 2018
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
SBA pool securities
Mortgage-backed securities
$
$
23,784
17,291
1,291
118,454
$
(52) $
(111)
(7)
(573)
33,873
17,952
61,966
373,783
$
(252) $
(416)
(1,782)
(9,617)
57,657
35,243
63,257
492,237
(304)
(527)
(1,789)
(10,190)
Total debt securities
$
160,820
$
(743) $
487,574
$
(12,067) $
648,394
$
(12,810)
As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s security portfolio consisted of 557 securities, 84 of which were in an unrealized loss
position. The majority of the unrealized losses are related to the Company’s mortgage-backed securities as discussed below.
At December 31, 2019, the Company held 62 mortgage-backed securities that were in an unrealized loss position, all of which
were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in
interest rates, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these mortgage-backed securities
and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider
these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2019, the Company held 18 SBA pool securities, two state, county and municipal securities and two corporate
securities that were in an unrealized loss position. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates,
and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be
required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-
temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.
F-33
During 2019 and 2018, the Company received timely and current interest and principal payments on all of the securities
classified as corporate debt securities. The Company’s investments in subordinated debt include investments in regional and
super-regional banks on which the Company prepares regular analysis through review of financial information or credit ratings.
Investments in preferred securities are also concentrated in the preferred obligations of regional and super-regional banks
through non-pooled investment structures. The Company did not have investments in “pooled” trust preferred securities at
December 31, 2019 or 2018.
Management and the Company’s Asset and Liability Committee (the “ALCO Committee”) evaluate securities for other-than-
temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such
evaluation. While the majority of the unrealized losses on debt securities relate to changes in interest rates, corporate debt
securities have also been affected by reduced levels of liquidity and higher risk premiums. Occasionally, management engages
independent third parties to evaluate the Company’s position in certain corporate debt securities to aid management and the
ALCO Committee in its determination regarding the status of impairment. The Company does not intend to sell these
investment securities at an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2019, and it is more likely than not that the Company will
not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity. Therefore, at December 31, 2019, these investments are not
considered impaired on an other-than-temporary basis.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities available for sale as of December 31, 2019, by contractual
maturity are shown below. Maturities may differ from contractual maturities in mortgage-backed securities because the
mortgages underlying the securities may be called or repaid without penalty. Securities not due at a single maturity date are
shown separately. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary.
(dollars in thousands)
Due in one year or less
Due from one year to five years
Due from five to ten years
Due after ten years
Mortgage-backed securities
Amortized
Cost
$
29,116
$
62,121
91,717
67,668
Estimated
Fair
Value
29,298
63,030
93,822
68,383
1,129,816
1,148,870
$
1,380,438
$
1,403,403
Securities with a carrying value of approximately $679.6 million and $510.0 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively, serve as collateral to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes
required or permitted by law.
The following table is a summary of sales activities in the Company's investment securities available for sale:
(dollars in thousands)
Gross gains on sales of securities
Gross losses on sales of securities
Net realized gains on sales of securities available for sale
Sales proceeds
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
$
$
522
(464)
58
64,995
$
$
$
390
(301)
89
68,727
$
$
$
38
(1)
37
3,090
Total gain (loss) on securities reported on the consolidated statements of income is comprised of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
Net realized gains on sales of securities available for sale
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on equity securities
Net realized gains on sales of other investments
Total gain (loss) on securities
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
$
58
19
61
$
89
$
(126)
—
138
$
(37) $
37
—
—
37
F-34
NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Loans
The Bank engages in a full complement of lending activities, including real estate-related loans, agriculture-related loans,
commercial and financial loans and consumer installment loans within select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South
Carolina. During 2015 and 2016, the Bank purchased residential mortgage loan pools collateralized by properties located
outside our Southeast markets, specifically in California, Washington and Illinois. These loans are reported as purchased loan
pools on the consolidated balance sheets. During the third quarter of 2016, the Bank began purchasing from unrelated third
parties consumer installment home improvement loans made to borrowers throughout the United States. As of December 31,
2019 and 2018, the net carrying value of these consumer installment home improvement loans was approximately $415.0
million and $399.9 million, respectively, and such loans are reported in the consumer installment loan category. During the
fourth quarter of 2016, the Bank purchased a pool of commercial insurance premium finance loans made to borrowers
throughout the United States and began a division to originate, administer and service these types of loans. As of December 31,
2019 and 2018, the net carrying value of commercial insurance premium finance loans was approximately $646.5 million and
$413.5 million, respectively, and such loans are reported in the commercial, financial and agricultural loan category. The Bank
concentrates the majority of its lending activities in real estate loans. While risk of loss in the Company’s portfolio is primarily
tied to the credit quality of the various borrowers, risk of loss may increase due to factors beyond the Company’s control, such
as local, regional and/or national economic downturns. General conditions in the real estate market may also impact the relative
risk in the real estate portfolio.
A substantial portion of the Bank’s loans are secured by real estate in the Bank’s primary market area. In addition, a substantial
portion of the OREO is located in those same markets. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the
Bank’s loan portfolio and the recovery of a substantial portion of the carrying amount of OREO are susceptible to changes in
real estate conditions in the Bank’s primary market area.
Commercial, financial and agricultural loans include both secured and unsecured loans for working capital, expansion, crop
production, commercial insurance premium finance and other business purposes. Commercial, financial and agricultural loans
also include SBA loans and municipal loans. Short-term working capital loans are secured by non-real estate collateral such as
accounts receivable, crops, inventory and equipment. The Bank evaluates the financial strength, cash flow, management, credit
history of the borrower and the quality of the collateral securing the loan. The Bank often requires personal guarantees and
secondary sources of repayment on commercial, financial and agricultural loans.
loans, commercial and farmland loans and residential
Real estate loans include construction and development
loans.
Construction and development loans include loans for the development of residential neighborhoods, one-to-four family home
residential construction loans to builders and consumers, and commercial real estate construction loans, primarily for owner-
occupied properties. The Company limits its construction lending risk through adherence to established underwriting
procedures. Commercial real estate loans include loans secured by owner-occupied commercial buildings for office, storage,
retail, farmland and warehouse space. They also include non-owner occupied commercial buildings such as leased retail and
office space. Commercial real estate loans may be larger in size and may involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four
family residential mortgage loans. Payments on such loans are often dependent on successful operation or management of the
properties. The Company's residential loans represent permanent mortgage financing and are secured by residential properties
located within the Bank's market areas, along with warehouse lines of credit secured by residential mortgages.
Consumer installment loans and other loans include home improvement loans, automobile loans, boat and recreational vehicle
financing, and both secured and unsecured personal loans. Consumer loans carry greater risks than other loans, as the collateral
can consist of rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles and equipment that may not provide an adequate source of
repayment of the loan in the case of default.
F-35
Loans are stated at unpaid balances, net of unearned income and deferred loan fees. Balances within the major loans receivable
categories are presented in the following table, excluding purchased loans.
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
December 31,
2019
1,646,438
1,083,564
2,447,834
1,901,352
450,799
7,529,987
$
$
2018
1,316,359
671,198
1,814,529
1,403,000
455,371
5,660,457
$
$
Purchased loans are defined as loans that were acquired in bank acquisitions including those that are covered by a loss-sharing
agreement with the FDIC. Purchased loans totaling $5.08 billion and $2.59 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively, are not included in the above schedule.
The carrying value of purchased loans are shown below according to major loan type as of the end of the years shown.
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
2019
2018
$
$
384,273
465,497
1,905,205
1,220,271
1,100,035
5,075,281
$
$
$
$
372,686
227,900
1,337,859
623,199
27,188
2,588,832
2018
861,595
(1,803)
2,053,744
11,918
—
—
—
—
(6,396)
(330,226)
—
2,588,832
A rollforward of purchased loans for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 is shown below.
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, January 1
Charge-offs
Additions due to acquisitions
Accretion
Purchase of acquired formerly serviced portfolio
Subsequent fair value adjustments recorded to goodwill
Loans sold
Transfers to loans held for sale
Transfers to purchased other real estate owned
Payments received
Other
Ending balance
2019
2,588,832
(5,275)
3,511,645
20,255
103,530
(4,854)
(109,611)
(8,293)
(5,135)
(1,015,798)
(15)
5,075,281
$
$
The following is a summary of changes in the accretable discounts of purchased loans during years ended December 31, 2019
and 2018:
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, January 1
Additions due to acquisitions
Reduction due to purchase of acquired formerly serviced portfolio
Accretion
Accretable discounts removed due to charge-offs
Transfers between non-accretable and accretable discounts, net
Ending balance
2019
2018
$
$
40,496
38,116
(750)
(20,255)
—
1,678
59,285
$
$
20,192
30,037
—
(11,918)
(42)
2,227
40,496
Purchased loan pools are defined as groups of residential mortgage loans that were not acquired in bank acquisitions or FDIC-
assisted transactions. As of December 31, 2019, purchased loan pools totaled $213.2 million and consisted of whole-loan,
adjustable rate residential mortgages on properties outside the Company’s markets, with principal balances totaling $212.4
F-36
million and $811,000 of remaining purchase premium paid at acquisition. As of December 31, 2018, purchased loan pools
totaled $262.6 million with principal balances totaling $260.5 million and $2.1 million of purchase premium paid at acquisition.
As of December 31, 2019, purchased loan pools included principal balance of $810,000 risk-rated 7 (Substandard), while all
other loans in purchased loan pools were performing current loans risk-rated 3 (Good Credit). As of December 31, 2019,
purchased pool loans had one loan on nonaccrual status with a principal balance of $810,000 and had no loans classified as
troubled debt restructurings.
As of December 31, 2018, all loans in purchased loan pools were performing current loans risk-rated 3 (Good Credit). As of
December 31, 2018, purchased pool loans had no loans on nonaccrual status and no loans classified as troubled debt
restructurings.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had allocated $624,000 and $732,000, respectively, of allowance for loan losses
for the purchased loan pools.
As part of the due diligence process prior to purchasing an individual mortgage pool, a complete re-underwrite of the individual
loan files was conducted. The underwriting process included a review of all income, asset, credit and property related
documentation that was used to originate the loan. Underwriters utilized the originating lender’s program guidelines, as well as
general prudent mortgage lending standards to assess each individual loan file. Additional research was conducted in order to
assess the real estate market conditions and market expectations in the geographic areas where a collateral concentration
existed. As part of this review, an automated valuation model was employed to provide current collateral valuations and to
support individual loan-to-value ratios. Additionally, a sample of site inspections was completed to provide further assurance.
The results of the due diligence review were evaluated by officers of the Company in order to determine overall conformance
to the Bank’s credit and lending policies.
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans
A loan is placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s judgment, the collection of the interest income appears doubtful.
Interest receivable that has been accrued and is subsequently determined to have doubtful collectability is charged to interest
income. Interest on loans that are classified as nonaccrual is subsequently applied to principal until the loans are returned to
accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought
current and future payments are reasonably assured. Past due loans are loans whose principal or interest is past due 30 days or
more. In some cases, where borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties, loans may be restructured to provide terms
significantly different from the original contractual terms.
The following table presents an analysis of loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis, excluding purchased loans.
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
The following table presents an analysis of purchased loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis.
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
2019
5,933
842
19,565
16,560
2,123
45,023
$
$
F-37
2019
2018
$
$
3,914
1,145
4,232
19,557
443
29,291
$
$
$
$
1,412
892
4,654
10,465
529
17,952
2018
1,199
6,119
5,534
10,769
486
24,107
The following table presents an analysis of past due loans, excluding purchased loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Loans
30-59
Days
Past Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days
Past Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
Loans 90
Days or
More
Past Due
and
Still
Accruing
$
16,323
$
9,925
$
7,167
$
33,415
$ 1,613,023
$ 1,646,438
$
4,811
6,054
4,195
25,581
2,752
54,905
$
1,222
565
5,243
1,301
18,256
994
3,087
17,318
1,260
29,826
8,270
7,847
48,142
5,313
$ 102,987
1,075,294
2,439,987
1,853,210
445,486
$ 7,427,000
1,083,564
2,447,834
1,901,352
450,799
$ 7,529,987
$
$
$
—
—
—
922
5,733
Loans
30-59
Days
Past Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days
Past Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
Loans 90
Days or
More
Past Due
and
Still
Accruing
$
6,479
$
5,295
$
4,763
$
16,537
$ 1,299,822
$ 1,316,359
$
3,808
1,218
1,625
11,423
2,344
23,089
$
481
530
4,631
1,167
12,104
725
3,645
8,923
735
18,791
$
2,424
5,800
24,977
4,246
53,984
668,774
1,808,729
1,378,023
451,125
$ 5,606,473
671,198
1,814,529
1,403,000
455,371
$ 5,660,457
$
$
$
—
—
—
414
4,222
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2019
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2018
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
The following table presents an analysis of purchased past due loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Loans
30-59
Days
Past Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days
Past Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
Loans 90
Days or
More
Past Due
and
Still
Accruing
$
1,087
$
348
$
4,738
$
6,173
$
378,100
$
384,273
$
1,731
3,209
20,645
6,714
33,386
2
2,840
8,685
1,102
12,977
$
$
588
12,511
12,956
1,704
32,497
2,321
18,560
42,286
9,520
78,860
463,176
1,886,645
1,177,985
1,090,515
$ 4,996,421
465,497
1,905,205
1,220,271
1,100,035
$ 5,075,281
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
21
21
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2019
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
F-38
Loans
30-59
Days
Past Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days
Past Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
Loans 90
Days or
More
Past Due
and
Still
Accruing
$
421
$
416
$
1,015
$
1,852
$
370,834
$
372,686
$
627
1,935
12,531
679
16,193
$
$
370
736
2,407
237
4,166
5,273
1,698
7,005
249
15,240
$
6,270
4,369
21,943
1,165
35,599
221,630
1,333,490
601,256
26,023
$ 2,553,233
227,900
1,337,859
623,199
27,188
$ 2,588,832
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2018
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Impaired Loans
Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to
collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreements. Impaired loans include loans
on nonaccrual status and accruing troubled debt restructurings. When determining if the Company will be unable to collect all
principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, the Company considers the
borrower’s capacity to pay, which includes such factors as the borrower’s current financial statements, an analysis of global
cash flow sufficient to pay all debt obligations and an evaluation of secondary sources of repayment, such as guarantor support
and collateral value. The Company individually assesses for impairment all nonaccrual loans greater than $100,000 and all
troubled debt restructurings greater than $100,000 (including all troubled debt restructurings, whether or not currently classified
as such). The tables below include all loans deemed impaired, whether or not individually assessed for impairment. If a loan is
deemed impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value
of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from
the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount
is reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis.
F-39
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans, excluding purchased loans:
(dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans
Troubled debt restructurings not included above
Total impaired loans
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
Foregone interest income on impaired loans
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
$
$
$
29,291
11,646
40,937
1,023
882
$
$
$
$
17,952
9,323
27,275
827
853
$
$
$
$
14,202
13,599
27,801
1,867
950
The following table presents an analysis of information pertaining to impaired loans, excluding purchased loans as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2019
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
$
5,825
$
1,084
$
3,472
$
4,556
$
1,025
$
3,027
1,535
7,586
28,122
473
43,541
$
612
627
5,315
451
8,089
$
598
6,344
22,434
—
32,848
$
1,210
6,971
27,749
451
40,937
$
68
392
1,695
—
3,180
$
1,266
6,682
21,270
467
32,712
$
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2018
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
$
1,902
$
1,155
$
513
$
1,668
$
4
$
1,637
1,378
8,950
16,885
561
29,676
$
613
867
5,144
545
8,324
$
424
6,649
11,365
—
18,951
$
1,037
7,516
16,509
545
27,275
$
3
1,591
867
—
2,465
$
984
7,879
15,029
534
26,063
$
F-40
The following is a summary of information pertaining to purchased impaired loans:
(dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans
Troubled debt restructurings not included above
Total impaired loans
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
Foregone interest income on impaired loans
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
$
$
$
45,023
17,963
62,986
3,108
3,218
$
$
$
$
24,107
18,740
42,847
2,203
1,483
$
$
$
$
15,428
20,472
35,900
1,625
1,239
The following table presents an analysis of information pertaining to purchased impaired loans as of December 31, 2019 and
2018.
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2019
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
$
13,380
$
838
$
5,125
$
5,963
$
673
$
4,377
3,358
34,929
33,744
3,540
88,951
$
707
11,520
8,098
2,123
23,286
$
1,007
12,037
21,531
—
39,700
$
1,714
23,557
29,629
2,123
62,986
$
136
561
1,897
—
3,267
$
5,640
19,126
38,572
932
68,647
$
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2018
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and
development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Credit Quality Indicators
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
$
5,717
$
473
$
757
$
1,230
$
— $
836
13,714
14,766
24,839
526
59,562
$
623
1,115
8,185
486
10,882
$
6,511
10,581
14,116
—
31,965
$
7,134
11,696
22,301
486
42,847
$
476
684
773
—
1,933
$
5,712
12,349
21,433
229
40,559
$
The Company uses a nine category risk grading system to assign a risk grade to each loan in the portfolio. The following is a
description of the general characteristics of the grades:
Grade 1 – Prime Credit – This grade represents loans to the Company’s most creditworthy borrowers or loans that are secured
by cash or cash equivalents.
Grade 2 – Strong Credit – This grade includes loans that exhibit one or more characteristics better than that of a Good Credit.
Generally, the debt service coverage and borrower’s liquidity is materially better than required by the Company’s loan policy.
Grade 3 – Good Credit – This grade is assigned to loans to borrowers who exhibit satisfactory credit histories, contain
acceptable loan structures and demonstrate ability to repay.
Grade 4 – Satisfactory Credit – This grade includes loans which exhibit all the characteristics of a Good Credit, but warrant
more than normal level of banker supervision due to (i) circumstances which elevate the risks of performance (such as start-up
operations, untested management, heavy leverage and interim losses); (ii) adverse, extraordinary events that have affected, or
could affect, the borrower’s cash flow, financial condition, ability to continue operating profitability or refinancing (such as
F-41
death of principal, fire and divorce); (iii) loans that require more than the normal servicing requirements (such as any type of
construction financing, acquisition and development loans, accounts receivable or inventory loans and floor plan loans);
(iv) existing technical exceptions which raise some doubts about the Bank’s perfection in its collateral position or the continued
financial capacity of the borrower; or (v) improvements in formerly criticized borrowers, which may warrant banker
supervision.
Grade 5 – Fair Credit – This grade is assigned to loans that are currently performing and supported by adequate financial
information that reflects repayment capacity but exhibits a loan-to-value ratio greater than 110%, based on a documented
collateral valuation.
Grade 6 – Other Assets Especially Mentioned – This grade includes loans that exhibit potential weaknesses that deserve
management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for
the asset or in the Company’s credit position at some future date.
Grade 7 – Substandard – This grade represents loans which are inadequately protected by the current credit worthiness and
paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. These assets exhibit a well-defined weakness or are
characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These
weaknesses may be characterized by past due performance, operating losses or questionable collateral values.
Grade 8 – Doubtful – This grade includes loans which exhibit all of the characteristics of a substandard loan with the added
provision that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and
values, highly questionable or improbable.
Grade 9 – Loss – This grade is assigned to loans which are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their
continuance as active assets of the Bank is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no
recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing it off.
The following table presents the loan portfolio, excluding purchased loans, by risk grade as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in
thousands).
As of December 31, 2019
Risk Grade
1 - Prime credit
2 - Strong credit
3 - Good credit
4 - Satisfactory credit
5 - Fair credit
6 - Other assets especially mentioned
7 - Substandard
8 - Doubtful
9 - Loss
Total
Commercial,
Financial
and
Agricultural
497,942
$
670,267
161,353
289,882
19,450
1,952
5,592
—
—
1,646,438
$
Real Estate -
Residential
27
$
32,101
1,730,257
104,597
8,077
2,540
23,753
—
—
1,901,352
$
Consumer
Installment
11,807
$
—
7,551
430,707
30
120
574
8
2
450,799
$
Total
509,984
746,591
3,289,885
2,772,794
119,019
32,666
59,038
8
2
7,529,987
$
$
Real Estate -
Commercial
and
Farmland
208
26,688
1,313,853
993,053
67,047
20,268
26,717
—
—
2,447,834
Real Estate -
Construction
and
Development
$
— $
17,535
76,871
954,555
24,415
7,786
2,402
—
—
1,083,564
$
$
F-42
As of December 31, 2018
Risk Grade
1 - Prime credit
2 - Strong credit
3 - Good credit
4 - Satisfactory credit
5 - Fair credit
6 - Other assets especially mentioned
7 - Substandard
8 - Doubtful
9 - Loss
Total
Commercial,
Financial
and
Agricultural
530,864
$
452,250
174,811
137,038
13,714
5,130
2,552
—
—
1,316,359
$
Real Estate -
Construction
and
Development
40
$
681
74,657
582,456
6,264
4,091
3,009
—
—
671,198
$
Real Estate -
Commercial
and
Farmland
$
$
500
37,079
888,433
814,068
30,364
20,959
23,126
—
—
1,814,529
Real Estate -
Residential
16
$
33,043
1,246,383
94,143
8,634
4,881
15,900
—
—
1,403,000
$
Consumer
Installment
10,744
$
48
23,844
419,983
78
57
617
—
—
455,371
$
Total
542,164
523,101
2,408,128
2,047,688
59,054
35,118
45,204
—
—
5,660,457
$
$
The following table presents the purchased loan portfolio by risk grade as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands).
As of December 31, 2019
Risk Grade
1 - Prime credit
2 - Strong credit
3 - Good credit
4 - Satisfactory credit
5 - Fair credit
6 - Other assets especially mentioned
7 - Substandard
8 - Doubtful
9 - Loss
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Risk Grade
1 - Prime credit
2 - Strong credit
3 - Good credit
4 - Satisfactory credit
5 - Fair credit
6 - Other assets especially mentioned
7 - Substandard
8 - Doubtful
9 - Loss
Total
Commercial,
Financial
and
Agricultural
76,516
$
5,729
72,008
192,890
13,867
2,950
20,313
—
—
384,273
$
Commercial,
Financial
and
Agricultural
90,205
$
2,648
20,489
215,096
14,445
11,601
18,202
—
—
372,686
$
$
$
Real Estate -
Construction
and
Development
$
Real Estate -
Commercial
and
Farmland
Real Estate -
Residential
— $
— $
—
13,252
423,119
17,343
9,437
2,346
—
—
465,497
$
— $
8,611
406,185
1,355,031
66,072
33,674
35,632
—
—
1,905,205
$
60,154
990,302
118,181
16,541
7,592
27,501
—
—
1,220,271
Consumer
Installment
1,377
19,287
1,050,368
22,526
178
93
6,206
—
—
1,100,035
$
Real Estate -
Construction
and
Development
$
Real Estate -
Commercial
and
Farmland
Real Estate -
Residential
— $
— $
—
18,022
195,079
2,728
1,459
10,612
—
—
227,900
$
— $
7,407
230,089
1,034,943
29,468
10,063
25,889
—
—
1,337,859
$
74,398
385,279
118,082
16,937
7,231
21,272
—
—
623,199
Consumer
Installment
570
164
2,410
23,177
35
94
738
—
—
27,188
$
Total
77,893
93,781
2,532,115
2,111,747
114,001
53,746
91,998
—
—
5,075,281
Total
90,775
84,617
656,289
1,586,377
63,613
30,448
76,713
—
—
2,588,832
$
$
$
$
F-43
Troubled Debt Restructurings
The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if both (i) the borrower is experiencing financial
difficulties and (ii) the Company has granted a concession. Concessions may include interest rate reductions to below market
interest rates, principal forgiveness, restructuring amortization schedules and other actions intended to minimize potential
losses. The Company has exhibited the greatest success for rehabilitation of the loan by a reduction in the rate alone
(maintaining the amortization of the debt) or a combination of a rate reduction and the forbearance of previously past due
interest or principal. This has most typically been evidenced in certain commercial real estate loans whereby a disruption in the
borrower’s cash flow resulted in an extended past due status, of which the borrower was unable to catch up completely as the
cash flow of the property ultimately stabilized at a level lower than its original level. A reduction in rate, coupled with a
forbearance of unpaid principal and/or interest, allowed the net cash flows to service the debt under the modified terms.
The Company’s policy requires a restructure request to be supported by a current, well-documented credit evaluation of the
borrower’s financial condition and a collateral evaluation that is no older than six months from the date of the restructure. Key
factors of that evaluation include the documentation of current, recurring cash flows, support provided by the guarantor(s) and
the current valuation of the collateral. If the appraisal in file is older than six months, an evaluation must be made as to the
continued reasonableness of the valuation. For certain income-producing properties, current rent rolls and/or other income
information can be utilized to support the appraisal valuation, when coupled with documented cap rates within our markets and
a physical inspection of the collateral to validate the current condition.
The Company’s policy states in the event a loan has been identified as a troubled debt restructuring, it should be assigned a
grade of substandard and placed on nonaccrual status until such time that the borrower has demonstrated the ability to service
the loan payments based on the restructured terms – generally defined as six months of satisfactory payment history. Missed
payments under the original loan terms are not considered under the new structure; however, subsequent missed payments are
considered non-performance and are not considered toward the six month required term of satisfactory payment history. The
Company’s loan policy states that a nonaccrual loan may be returned to accrual status when (i) none of its principal and interest
is due and unpaid, and the Company expects repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest, or (ii) it otherwise
becomes well secured and in the process of collection. Restoration to accrual status on any given loan must be supported by a
well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and the prospects for full repayment, approved by the
Company’s Chief Credit Officer.
In the normal course of business, the Company renews loans with a modification of the interest rate or terms that are not
deemed as troubled debt restructurings because the borrower is not experiencing financial difficulty. The Company modified
loans in 2019 and 2018 totaling $325.7 million and $111.7 million, respectively, under such parameters.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had a balance of $14.1 million and $11.0 million, respectively, in troubled
debt restructurings, excluding purchased loans. The Company has recorded $827,000 and $890,000 in previous charge-offs on
such loans at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company’s balance in the allowance for loan losses allocated to
such troubled debt restructurings was $1.8 million and $820,000 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. At
December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been
modified in troubled restructurings.
During the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company modified loans as troubled debt restructurings, excluding
purchased loans, with principal balances of $4.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively, and these modifications did not have a
material impact on the Company's allowance for loan losses. The following table presents the loans by class modified as
troubled debt restructurings, excluding purchased loans, which occurred during the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
#
5
—
2
20
7
34
Balance
(in thousands)
784
—
220
3,751
24
4,779
$
$
#
11
1
2
13
6
33
Balance
(in thousands)
348
3
440
1,430
35
2,256
$
$
F-44
Troubled debt restructurings, excluding purchased loans, with an outstanding balance of $1.9 million and $1.3 million at
December 31, 2019 and 2018 defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and these defaults did
not have a material impact on the Company’s allowance for loan loss. The following table presents the troubled debt
restructurings by class that defaulted (defined as 30 days past due) during the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
#
4
1
2
6
4
17
Balance
(in thousands)
81
2
794
1,052
17
1,946
$
$
#
8
1
1
16
7
33
Balance
(in thousands)
107
—
246
911
34
1,298
$
$
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class, excluding purchased loans, classified
separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Accruing Loans
Non-Accruing Loans
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
5
2
12
83
4
106
Balance
(in thousands)
642
64
2,740
8,192
8
11,646
$
$
#
14
1
2
21
21
59
Balance
(in thousands)
312
1
359
1,751
59
2,482
$
$
As of December 31, 2018
Accruing Loans
Non-Accruing Loans
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
5
5
12
71
6
99
Balance
(in thousands)
256
145
2,863
6,043
16
9,323
$
$
#
14
1
3
20
24
62
Balance
(in thousands)
138
2
426
1,119
69
1,754
$
$
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had a balance of $21.1 million and $22.2 million, respectively, in troubled
debt restructurings included in purchased loans. The Company has recorded $1.1 million and $940,000, respectively, in
previous charge-offs on such loans at December 31, 2019 and 2018. At December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any
commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified in troubled restructurings.
During the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company modified purchased loans as troubled debt restructurings,
with principal balances of $3.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and these modifications did not have a material impact on
the Company’s allowance for loan losses. The following table presents the purchased loans by class modified as troubled debt
restructurings, which occurred during the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
#
—
—
—
28
3
31
Balance
(in thousands)
—
—
—
3,691
34
3,725
$
$
#
4
—
1
27
2
34
Balance
(in thousands)
63
—
71
2,351
14
2,499
$
$
F-45
Troubled debt restructurings included in purchased loans with an outstanding balance of $2.2 million and $2.5 million defaulted
during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and these defaults did not have a material impact on the
Company’s allowance for loan loss. The following table presents the troubled debt restructurings by class that defaulted
(defined as 30 days past due) during the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
#
2
—
3
17
1
23
Balance
(in thousands)
6
—
1,148
1,078
15
2,247
$
$
#
—
—
1
25
—
26
Balance
(in thousands)
—
—
71
2,400
—
2,471
$
$
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of purchased loans, classified separately
as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As of December 31, 2019
Accruing Loans
Non-Accruing Loans
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
1
4
9
114
—
128
Balance
(in thousands)
30
872
3,992
13,069
—
17,963
$
$
#
3
2
6
19
6
36
Balance
(in thousands)
23
252
1,712
1,106
48
3,141
$
$
As of December 31, 2018
Accruing Loans
Non-Accruing Loans
Loan Class
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Real estate – construction and development
Real estate – commercial and farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
1
4
12
115
—
132
Balance
(in thousands)
31
1,015
6,162
11,532
—
18,740
$
$
#
3
5
7
24
4
43
Balance
(in thousands)
32
293
1,685
1,424
17
3,451
$
$
As of December 31, 2019, there were no loans in purchased loan pools that had been modified as troubled debt restructurings.
As of December 31, 2018, there were no loans in purchased loan pools that had been modified as a troubled debt restructurings.
Related Party Loans
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted loans to certain executive officers, directors and their affiliates.
Changes in related party loans are summarized as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, January 1
Advances
Repayments
Transactions due to changes in related parties
Ending balance
December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
1,458
6,799
(2,537)
27,960
33,680
$
$
2,145
257
(944)
—
1,458
F-46
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the periods indicated. Allocation of
a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.
Commercial,
Financial
and
Agricultural
Real Estate –
Construction
and
Development
Real Estate –
Commercial
and
Farmland
Real Estate -
Residential
Consumer
Installment
Purchased
Loans
Purchased
Loan
Pools
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Twelve months ended
December 31, 2019
Balance, January 1, 2019
$
4,287
$
3,734
$
8,975
$
5,363
$
3,795
$
1,933
$
732
$
28,819
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off
6,699
(7,131)
3,072
2,421
(321)
1,446
(1,430)
3,108
(160)
4,774
(5,695)
1,418
(5,051)
25
113
295
910
4,985
(108)
—
—
19,758
(19,788)
9,400
Balance, December 31, 2019
$
6,927
$
5,859
$
9,104
$
8,606
$
3,784
$
3,285
$
624
$
38,189
Period-end amount allocated
to:
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment(1)
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment
Ending balance
Loans:
Individually evaluated for
impairment(1)
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
Acquired with deteriorated credit
quality
$
$
$
1,627
$
68
$
392
$
1,790
$
— $
3,285
$
— $
7,162
5,300
5,791
8,712
6,816
3,784
—
6,927
$
5,859
$
9,104
$
8,606
$
3,784
$
3,285
$
624
624
31,027
$
38,189
9,483
$
598
$
6,344
$
22,998
$
— $
42,242
$
810
$
82,475
1,636,955
1,082,966
2,441,490
1,878,354
450,799
4,899,116
212,398
12,602,078
—
—
—
—
—
133,923
—
133,923
Ending balance
$
1,646,438
$
1,083,564
$
2,447,834
$
1,901,352
$
450,799
$5,075,281
$ 213,208
$12,818,476
(1) At December 31, 2019, loans individually evaluated for impairment includes all nonaccrual loans greater than $100,000 and all troubled
debt restructurings greater than $100,000, including all troubled debt restructurings and not only those currently classified as troubled
debt restructurings.
F-47
Commercial,
Financial
and
Agricultural
Real Estate –
Construction
and
Development
Real Estate –
Commercial
and
Farmland
Real Estate -
Residential
Consumer
Installment
Purchased
Loans
Purchased
Loan
Pools
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Twelve months ended
December 31, 2018
Balance, January 1, 2018
$
3,631
$
3,629
$
7,501
$
4,786
$
1,916
$
3,253
$
1,075
$
25,791
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off
10,690
(13,803)
3,769
277
(292)
120
1,636
(338)
1,002
(771)
5,569
(4,189)
(2,164)
(1,738)
176
346
499
2,582
(343)
—
—
16,667
(21,131)
7,492
Balance, December 31, 2018
$
4,287
$
3,734
$
8,975
$
5,363
$
3,795
$
1,933
$
732
$
28,819
Period-end amount allocated
to:
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment(1)
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment
Ending balance
Loans:
Individually evaluated for
impairment(1)
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
Acquired with deteriorated
credit quality
$
$
$
570
$
3
$
1,591
$
867
$
— $
1,933
$
— $
4,964
3,717
3,731
7,384
4,496
3,795
—
4,287
$
3,734
$
8,975
$
5,363
$
3,795
$
1,933
$
732
732
23,855
$
28,819
3,211
$
424
$
6,649
$
11,364
$
— $
32,244
$
— $
53,892
1,313,148
670,774
1,807,880
1,391,636
455,371
2,468,996
262,625
8,370,430
—
—
—
—
—
87,592
—
87,592
Ending balance
$ 1,316,359
$
671,198
$
1,814,529
$
1,403,000
$
455,371
$2,588,832
$ 262,625
$8,511,914
(1) At December 31, 2018, loans individually evaluated for impairment includes all nonaccrual loans greater than $100,000 and all troubled
debt restructurings greater than $100,000, including all troubled debt restructurings and not only those currently classified as troubled
debt restructurings.
F-48
Commercial,
Financial
and
Agricultural
Real Estate –
Construction
and
Development
Real Estate –
Commercial
and
Farmland
Real Estate -
Residential
Consumer
Installment
Purchased
Loans
Purchased
Loan
Pools
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Twelve months ended
December 31, 2017
Balance, January 1, 2017
$
2,192
$
2,990
$
7,662
$
6,786
$
827
$
1,626
$
1,837
$
23,920
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off
3,019
(2,850)
1,270
488
(95)
246
508
(853)
184
(86)
(2,151)
2,591
(1,618)
2,606
(2,900)
237
116
1,921
(762)
—
—
8,364
(10,467)
3,974
Balance, December 31, 2017
$
3,631
$
3,629
$
7,501
$
4,786
$
1,916
$
3,253
$
1,075
$
25,791
Period-end amount allocated
to:
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment(1)
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment
Ending balance
Loans:
Individually evaluated for
impairment(1)
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
Acquired with deteriorated
credit quality
$
$
$
465
$
48
$
1,047
$
1,028
$
— $
3,253
$
177
$
6,018
3,166
3,581
6,454
3,758
1,916
—
898
19,773
3,631
$
3,629
$
7,501
$
4,786
$
1,916
$
3,253
$
1,075
$
25,791
2,971
$
500
$
8,873
$
10,818
$
— $
28,165
$
904
$
52,231
1,359,537
624,095
1,526,566
998,643
324,511
718,447
327,342
5,879,141
—
—
—
—
—
114,983
—
114,983
Ending balance
$ 1,362,508
$
624,595
$
1,535,439
$
1,009,461
$
324,511
$ 861,595
$ 328,246
$6,046,355
(1) At December 31, 2017, loans individually evaluated for impairment includes all nonaccrual loans greater than $100,000 and all troubled
debt restructurings greater than $100,000, including all troubled debt restructurings and not only those currently classified as troubled
debt restructurings.
NOTE 5. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Land
Buildings and leasehold improvements
Furniture and equipment
Construction in progress
Premises and equipment, gross
Accumulated depreciation
Premises and equipment, net
December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
74,868
167,837
69,108
2,282
314,095
(80,993)
233,102
$
$
49,518
110,623
53,425
3,312
216,878
(71,468)
145,410
Depreciation expense was approximately $13.1 million, $10.0 million, and $9.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
At December 31, 2019, estimated costs to complete construction projects in progress and other binding commitments for capital
expenditures were not a material amount.
F-49
NOTE 6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The change in the carrying value of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 is summarized below for both
the total Company and by the Company's reportable segments.
(dollars in thousands)
Consolidated
Carrying amount of goodwill at beginning of year
Additions related to acquisitions in current year
Fair value adjustments related to acquisitions in prior year
Carrying amount of goodwill at end of year
Banking Division
Carrying amount of goodwill at beginning of year
Additions related to acquisitions in current year
Fair value adjustments related to acquisitions in prior year
Carrying amount of goodwill at end of year
Premium Finance Division
Carrying amount of goodwill at beginning of year
Additions related to acquisitions in current year
Fair value adjustments related to acquisitions in prior year
Carrying amount of goodwill at end of year
December 31,
2019
2018
503,434
430,497
(2,294)
931,637
$
$
438,144
$
430,497
(1,502)
125,532
377,902
—
503,434
125,532
312,612
—
867,139
$
438,144
65,290
—
(792)
64,498
$
$
—
65,290
—
65,290
$
$
$
$
$
$
During 2019, the Company recorded net additions to goodwill totaling $428.2 million comprised of $430.5 million related to
the Fidelity acquisition and $1.1 million, $(2.6) million and $(792,000) related to subsequent fair value adjustments on the
Hamilton, Atlantic and USPF acquisitions, respectively.
Impairment exists when a reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value.
At December 31, 2019, the Banking Division had positive equity and the Company's qualitative assessment indicated that it was
more likely than not that the Banking Division's fair value exceeded its carrying value, resulting in no goodwill impairment.
At December 31, 2019, the Premium Finance Division had positive equity but the Company’s qualitative assessment did not
indicate that it was more likely than not that the reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value. Therefore, the Company
proceeded to the two step impairment test. Step 1 includes the determination of the carrying value of the reporting unit,
including the goodwill and intangible assets, and estimating fair value of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a
reporting unit exceeds its fair value, Step 2 determines the impairment. Step 1 was completed for the Premium Finance Division
by updating the original cash flow model used to value the division with current customer information, margin assumptions and
future growth. The resulting fair value of the Premium Finance Division exceeded its carrying value, indicating no goodwill
impairment and eliminating the need to do Step 2.
The carrying value of intangible assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $91.6 million and $58.7 million, respectively.
Intangible assets are comprised of core deposit intangibles, an insurance agent relationships intangible, a "US Premium
Finance" trade name intangible and a non-compete agreement intangible. During 2019, the Company recorded core deposit
intangible assets of $50.6 million associated with the Fidelity acquisition. During 2018, the Company recorded core deposit
intangible assets of $23.6 million and $7.5 million associated with the Hamilton acquisition and the Atlantic acquisition,
respectively. The amortization period used for core deposit intangibles ranges from seven to ten years. Also during 2018, in
connection with the USPF acquisition, the Company recorded an insurance agent relationships intangible asset of $22.4 million,
a "US Premium Finance" trade name intangible asset of $1.1 million and a non-compete agreement intangible asset of
$162,000. The amortization periods used for the insurance agent relationships, the "US Premium Finance" trade name and the
non-compete agreement intangible assets are eight years, seven years and three years, respectively.
F-50
The following is a summary of information related to acquired intangible assets:
(dollars in thousands)
Amortized intangible assets:
Core deposit premiums
Insurance agent relationships
US Premium Finance trade name
Non-compete agreement
As of December 31, 2019
As of December 31, 2018
Gross
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
$
$
107,958
22,351
1,094
162
131,565
$
$
34,220
5,355
300
104
39,979
$
$
57,348
22,351
1,094
162
80,955
$
$
19,512
2,561
143
50
22,266
The aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $17.7 million, $9.5 million and $3.9 million for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
NOTE 7. DEPOSITS
The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2019 are as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
$
$
$
$
19,612
14,965
12,554
11,054
9,999
23,402
91,586
2,317,715
400,703
93,718
31,522
21,658
2,057
2,867,373
The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or more at December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $702.3
million and $423.6 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had brokered deposits of $452.7 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had
brokered deposits of $846.7 million.
Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $118.5 million and $8.0
million, respectively.
NOTE 8. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
The Company classifies the sales of securities under agreements to repurchase as short-term borrowings. The amounts received
under these agreements are reflected as a liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and the securities underlying
these agreements are included in investment securities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2019
and 2018, all securities sold under agreements to repurchase mature on a daily basis. The market value of the securities
fluctuate on a daily basis due to market conditions. The Company monitors the market value of the securities underlying these
agreements on a daily basis and is required to transfer additional securities if the market value of the securities fall below the
repurchase agreement price. The Company maintains an unpledged securities portfolio that it believes is sufficient to protect
against a decline in the market value of the securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
F-51
The following is a summary of securities sold under repurchase agreements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017:
(dollars in thousands)
Average daily balance during the year
Average interest rate during the year
Maximum month-end balance during the year
Weighted average interest rate at year-end
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
$
$
$
14,043
0.61 %
23,626
0.81 %
$
$
15,692
0.15 %
23,270
0.14 %
28,694
0.20 %
49,836
0.18 %
The following is a summary of the Company’s securities sold under agreements to repurchase at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
(dollars in thousands)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
$
20,635
$
20,384
At December 31, 2019, the investment securities underlying these agreements were comprised of state, county and municipal
securities and mortgage-backed securities. At December 31, 2018, the investment securities underlying these agreements were
comprised of mortgage-backed securities.
F-52
NOTE 9. OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") borrowings:
Convertible Flipper Advance due May 22, 2019; current interest rate of 4.68%
Principal Reducing Advance due June 20, 2019; fixed interest rate of 1.274%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 10, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.68%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 13, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.68%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 13, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.67%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 15, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.71%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 16, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.69%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 17, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.70%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 21, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.71%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 21, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.71%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 21, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.70%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 21, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.71%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 21, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.71%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 23, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.71%
Fixed Rate Advance due January 27, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.73%
Fixed Rate Advance due February 18, 2020; fixed interest rate of 1.72%
Fixed Rate Advance due December 9, 2030; fixed interest rate of 4.55%
Fixed Rate Advance due December 9, 2030; fixed interest rate of 4.55%
Principal Reducing Advance due September 29, 2031; fixed interest rate of 3.095%
Subordinated notes payable:
Subordinated notes payable due March 15, 2027 net of unamortized debt issuance cost of $943 and
$1,074, respectively; fixed interest rate of 5.75% through March 14, 2022; variable interest rate
thereafter at three-month LIBOR plus 3.616%
Subordinated notes payable due December 15, 2029 net of unamortized debt issuance cost of $2,408
and $0, respectively; fixed interest rate of 4.25% through December 14, 2024; variable interest rate
thereafter at three-month SOFR plus 2.94%
Subordinated notes payable due May 31, 2030 net of unaccreted purchase accounting fair value
adjustment of $1,596 and $0, respectively; fixed interest rate of 5.875% through May 31, 2025;
variable interest rate thereafter at three-month LIBOR plus 3.63%
Other debt:
Advance from correspondent bank due October 5, 2019; fixed interest rate of 4.25%
Advance from correspondent bank due September 5, 2026; secured by a loan receivable; fixed
interest rate of 2.09%
Advances under revolving credit agreement with a regional bank due September 26, 2020; secured
by subsidiary bank stock; variable interest rate at 90-day LIBOR plus 3.50% (6.24% at December 31,
2018)
December 31,
2019
2018
$
— $
—
50,000
50,000
100,000
50,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
200,000
25,000
75,000
25,000
100,000
50,000
100,000
1,422
985
1,712
1,514
500
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,434
993
1,858
74,057
73,926
117,592
76,595
—
1,346
—
—
20
1,529
—
1,398,709
$
$
70,000
151,774
The advances from the FHLB are collateralized by a blanket lien on all eligible first mortgage loans and other specific loans in
addition to FHLB stock. At December 31, 2019, $1.66 billion was available for borrowing on lines with the FHLB.
At December 31, 2018, the Company had a revolving credit arrangement with a regional bank with a maximum line amount of
$100.0 million. This line of credit was secured by subsidiary bank stock, expired on September 26, 2020, and bore a variable
interest rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 3.50%. The revolving credit arrangement was terminated by the Company during
December 2019.
As of December 31, 2019, the Bank maintained credit arrangements with various financial institutions to purchase federal funds
up to $157.0 million.
The Bank also participates in the Federal Reserve discount window borrowings program. At December 31, 2019, the Bank had
$2.22 billion of loans pledged at the Federal Reserve discount window and had $1.49 billion available for borrowing.
F-53
Subordinated Notes Payable
On March 13, 2017, the Company completed the public offering and sale of $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its
5.75% Fixed-To-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2027 (the “2027 subordinated notes”). The 2027 subordinated notes
were sold to the public at par pursuant to an underwriting agreement and were issued pursuant to an indenture and a
supplemental indenture. The 2027 subordinated notes will mature on March 15, 2027 and through March 14, 2022 will bear a
fixed rate of interest of 5.75% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on September 15 and March 15 of each year.
Beginning March 15, 2022, the interest rate on the 2027 subordinated notes resets quarterly to a floating rate per annum equal
to the then-current three-month LIBOR plus 3.616%, payable quarterly in arrears on June 15, September 15, December 15 and
March 15 of each year to the maturity date or earlier redemption. On any scheduled interest payment date beginning March 15,
2022, the Company may, at its option, redeem the 2027 subordinated notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to
100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.
On December 6, 2019, the Company completed the public offering and sale of $120.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
its 4.25% Fixed-To-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2029 (the “2029 subordinated notes”). The 2029 subordinated notes
were sold to the public at par pursuant to an underwriting agreement and were issued pursuant to an indenture and a
supplemental indenture. The 2029 subordinated notes will mature on December 15, 2029 and through December 14, 2024 will
bear a fixed rate of interest of 4.25% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
Beginning December 15, 2024, the interest rate on the 2029 subordinated notes resets quarterly to a floating rate per annum
equal to the then-current three-month SOFR plus 2.94%, payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and
December 15 of each year to the maturity date or earlier redemption. On any scheduled interest payment date beginning
December 15, 2024, the Company may, at its option, redeem the 2029 subordinated notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The 2027 and 2029 subordinated notes are unsecured and rank equally with all other unsecured subordinated indebtedness of
the Company, including any subordinated indebtedness issued in the future under the indenture governing the 2027 and 2029
subordinated notes. The 2027 and 2029 subordinated notes are subordinated in right of payment to all senior indebtedness of the
Company. The 2027 and 2029 subordinated notes are obligations of the Company only and are not guaranteed by any
subsidiaries, including the Bank. Additionally, the 2027 and 2029 subordinated notes are structurally subordinated to all
existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries, meaning that creditors of the Company’s
subsidiaries (including, in the case of the Bank, its depositors) generally will be paid from those subsidiaries’ assets before
holders of the 2027 and 2029 subordinated notes have any claim to those assets.
As a result of the Fidelity acquisition on July 1, 2019, the Bank assumed $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
5.875% Fixed-To-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030 (the "2030 subordinated notes"). The 2030 subordinated notes
were acquired inclusive of an unaccreted purchase accounting fair value adjustment of $1.6 million. The 2030 subordinated
notes will mature on May 31, 2030, and through May 31, 2025 will bear a fixed rate of interest of 5.875% per annum, payable
semi-annually in arrears on December 1 and June 1 of each year. Beginning on June 1, 2025, the interest rate on the 2030
subordinated notes resets quarterly to a floating rate per annum equal to the then-current three-month LIBOR plus 3.63%,
payable quarterly in arrears on September 1, December 1, March 1 and June 1 of each year to the maturity date or earlier
redemption. On any scheduled interest payment date beginning June 1, 2025, the Bank may, at its option, redeem the 2030
subordinated notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
The 2030 subordinated notes of the Bank are unsecured and structurally rank senior to all other unsecured subordinated
indebtedness of the Company. The 2030 subordinated notes are subordinated in right of payment to all senior indebtedness of
the Bank.
For regulatory capital adequacy purposes, the 2030 subordinated notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for the Bank and the 2027, 2029
and 2030 subordinated notes (collectively "subordinated notes") qualify as Tier 2 capital for the Company. If in the future the
subordinated notes no longer qualify as Tier 2 capital, the subordinated notes may be redeemed by the Bank or Company at a
redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to prior approval by the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
F-54
NOTE 10. SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES
During 2005, the Company acquired First National Banc Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of First National Banc,
Inc., whose sole purpose was to issue $5,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the
3-Month LIBOR plus 2.80% (4.74% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust
preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment
date beginning in April 2009. There are certain circumstances (as described in the trust agreement) in which the securities may
be redeemed within the first five years at the Company’s option. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates
outstanding at December 31, 2019 was $5,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $5,155,000.
The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $155,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2006, the Company formed Ameris Statutory Trust I, issuing trust preferred certificates in the aggregate principal
amount of $36,000,000. The related debentures issued by the Company were in the aggregate principal amount of
$37,114,000. Both the trust preferred securities and the related debentures bear interest at 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.63% (3.52%
at December 31, 2019). Distributions on the trust preferred securities are paid quarterly, with interest on the debentures being
paid on the corresponding dates. The trust preferred securities mature on December 15, 2036 and are redeemable at the
Company’s option beginning September 15, 2011. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $1,114,000
and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Banking Capital Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole
purpose was to issue $5,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR
plus 2.57% (4.53% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in
July 2009. The aggregate principal amount of
trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$5,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $5,155,000, and is being carried at $3,670,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $155,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole
purpose was to issue $4,500,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR
plus 3.15% (5.10% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in
March 2008. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$4,500,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $4,640,000, and is being carried at $3,592,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $140,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust III, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole
purpose was to issue $10,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.49% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred
securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date
beginning in March 2011. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$10,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $10,310,000, and is being carried at $6,241,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $310,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust IV, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole
purpose was to issue $10,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.54% (3.43% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred
securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date
beginning in December 2012. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019
was $5,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $5,155,000, and is being carried at $3,587,000
on the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $310,000 and is included in other assets.
F-55
During 2014, the Company acquired Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of Coastal, whose sole
purpose was to issue $5,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR
plus 3.15% (5.14% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in
October 2008. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$5,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $5,155,000, and is being carried at $4,091,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $155,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2014, the Company acquired Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust subsidiary of Coastal, whose sole
purpose was to issue $10,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.49% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred
securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date
beginning in December 2010. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019
was $10,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $10,310,000, and is being carried at
$6,650,000 on the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common
stock of the trust was $310,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2015, the Company acquired Merchants & Southern Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of Merchants, whose
sole purpose was to issue $3,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.90% (3.80% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred
securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date
beginning in March 2010. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$3,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $3,093,000, and is being carried at $2,131,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $93,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2015, the Company acquired Merchants & Southern Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust subsidiary of Merchants, whose
sole purpose was to issue $3,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.50% (3.39% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred
securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date
beginning in June 2011. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$3,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $3,093,000, and is being carried at $1,979,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $93,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2016, the Company acquired Atlantic BancGroup, Inc. Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of JAXB, whose
sole purpose was to issue $3,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.50% (3.39% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred
securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date
beginning in September 2015. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019
was $3,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $3,093,000, and is being carried at $1,902,000
on the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $93,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2016, the Company acquired Jacksonville Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of JAXB, whose sole purpose
was to issue $4,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
2.63% (4.53% at December 31, 2019)
through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in
June 2009. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$4,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $4,124,000, and is being carried at $3,251,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $124,000 and is included in other assets.
F-56
During 2016, the Company acquired Jacksonville Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust subsidiary of JAXB, whose sole purpose
was to issue $3,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
1.73% (3.62% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in
December 2011. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$3,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $3,093,000, and is being carried at $2,100,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $93,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2016, the Company acquired Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. Statutory Trust III, a statutory trust subsidiary of JAXB, whose
sole purpose was to issue $7,550,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 3.75% (5.64% at December 31, 2019). The trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are
redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in June 2013. The aggregate principal
amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was $7,550,000. The aggregate principal amount of
debentures outstanding was $7,784,000, and is being carried at $6,730,000 on the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized
purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $234,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2018, the Company acquired Cherokee Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of Hamilton, whose sole purpose
was to issue $3,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
1.50% (3.39% at December 31, 2019) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in
December 2010. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was
$3,093,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $3,000,000, and is being carried at $2,362,000 on
the Company’s balance sheet net of unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the
trust was $93,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2019, the Company acquired Fidelity Southern Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of Fidelity whose sole
purpose was to issue $15,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 3.10% (5.05% at December 31, 2019). The trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are
redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in June 2008. The aggregate principal
amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was $15,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of
debentures outstanding was $15,464,000, and is being carried at $14,139,000 on the Company’s balance sheet net of
unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $464,000 and is included in
other assets.
During 2019, the Company acquired Fidelity Southern Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust subsidiary of Fidelity whose sole
purpose was to issue $10,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.89% (3.79% at December 31, 2019). The trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are
redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in March 2010. The aggregate principal
amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was $10,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of
debentures outstanding was $10,310,000, and is being carried at $8,120,000 on the Company’s balance sheet net of
unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $310,000 and is included in
other assets.
During 2019, the Company acquired Fidelity Southern Statutory Trust III, a statutory trust subsidiary of Fidelity whose sole
purpose was to issue $20,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month
LIBOR plus 1.40% (3.29% at December 31, 2019). The trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are
redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in September 2012. The aggregate
principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2019 was $20,000,000. The aggregate principal
amount of debentures outstanding was $20,619,000, and is being carried at $14,746,000 on the Company’s balance sheet net of
unamortized purchase discount. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $619,000 and is included in
other assets.
Under applicable accounting standards, the assets and liabilities of such trusts, as well as the related income and expenses, are
excluded from the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, the subordinated debentures issued by the Company
and purchased by the trusts remain on the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the related interest expense continues to be
included in the consolidated statements of income. For regulatory capital purposes, the trust preferred securities qualify as a
component of Tier 2 Capital.
F-57
NOTE 11. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock Repurchase Program
On September 19, 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to
$100.0 million of its outstanding common stock. Repurchases of shares, which are authorized to occur through October 31,
2020, will be made, if at all, in accordance with applicable securities laws and may be made from time to time in the open
market or by negotiated transactions. The amount and timing of repurchases will be based on a variety of factors, including
share acquisition price, regulatory limitations and other market and economic factors. The program does not require the
repurchase of any specific number of shares. It replaces the Company's prior share repurchase program which was set to expire
in October 2019 and under which the Company repurchased $10.6 million, or 296,335 of its outstanding common stock in the
past year. As of December 31, 2019, $6.8 million, or 158,248 shares of the Company's common stock had been repurchased
under the new program.
Fidelity Acquisition
On July 1, 2019, the Company issued 22,181,522 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Fidelity. Such shares had a
value of $39.19 per share at the time of issuance, resulting in an increase in shareholders’ equity of $869.3 million.
For additional information regarding the Fidelity acquisition, see Note 2.
Hamilton Acquisition
On June 29, 2018, the Company issued 6,548,385 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Hamilton. Such shares had
a value of $53.35 per share at the time of issuance, resulting in an increase in shareholders’ equity of $349.4 million.
For additional information regarding the Hamilton acquisition, see Note 2.
Atlantic Acquisition
On May 25, 2018, the Company issued 2,631,520 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Atlantic. Such shares had a
value of $56.15 per share at the time of issuance, resulting in an increase in shareholders’ equity of $147.8 million.
For additional information regarding the Atlantic acquisition, see Note 2.
USPF Acquisition
On January 18, 2017, in exchange for 4.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock of USPF, the Company issued 128,572
unregistered shares of its common stock to a selling shareholder of USPF. A registration statement was filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2017 to register the resale or other disposition of these shares. The issuance of the
128,572 common shares, valued at $45.45 per share at the time of issuance, resulted in an increase in shareholders’ equity of
$5.8 million.
On January 3, 2018, in exchange for 25.01% of the outstanding shares of common stock of USPF, the Company issued 114,285
unregistered shares of its common stock and paid $12.5 million in cash to a selling shareholder of USPF. The issuance of the
114,285 common shares, valued at $48.55 per share at the time of issuance, resulted in an increase in shareholders’ equity of
$5.5 million.
On January 31, 2018, in exchange for the final 70% of the outstanding shares of common stock of USPF, the Company issued
830,301 unregistered shares of its common stock and paid $8.9 million in cash to the selling shareholders of USPF. The
issuance of the 830,301 common shares, valued at $53.55 per share at the time of issuance, resulted in an increase in
shareholders’ equity of $44.5 million. The selling shareholders of USPF could receive additional cash payments aggregating up
to $5.8 million based on the achievement by the Company's premium finance division of certain income targets, between
January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. The total contingent consideration paid was $1.2 million based on results achieved through
the applicable measurement period.
On February 16, 2018, a registration statement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the resale or
other disposition of the combined 944,586 shares issued on January 3, 2018 and January 31, 2018.
F-58
For additional information regarding the USPF acquisition, see Note 2.
2017 Public Offering
On March 6, 2017, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 2,012,500 shares of the Company’s common
stock at a price to the public of $46.50 per share. The Company received net proceeds from the issuance of approximately $88.7
million, after deducting $4.9 million in underwriting discounts and commissions and other issuance costs.
In March 2017, the Company made a capital contribution to the Bank in the amount of $110.0 million, using the net proceeds of
the March 6, 2017 issuance of common stock as well as a portion of the net proceeds of the March 13, 2017 issuance of the
Company’s 5.75% Fixed-To-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2027 discussed in Note 9.
NOTE 12. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the Company consists of changes in net unrealized gains and losses on
investment securities available for sale and interest rate swap derivatives. The reclassification for gains included in net income
is recorded in net gain (loss) on securities in the consolidated statements of income. The following tables present a summary of
the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) balances, net of tax, as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2018
Reclassification for gains included in net income, net of tax
Current year changes, net of tax
Balance, December 31, 2019
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2017
Reclassification to retained earnings due to change in federal corporate tax
rate
Adjusted balance, January 1, 2018
Reclassification for gains included in net income, net of tax
Current year changes, net of tax
Balance, December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2016
Reclassification for gains included in net income, net of tax
Current year changes, net of tax
Balance, December 31, 2017
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Securities
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
351
$
(5,177) $
—
(498)
(46)
23,365
(147) $
18,142
$
(4,826)
(46)
22,867
17,995
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Securities
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
292
$
(1,572) $
(1,280)
(53)
239
—
112
351
(339)
(1,911)
(70)
(3,196)
$
(5,177) $
(392)
(1,672)
(70)
(3,084)
(4,826)
$
$
$
$
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Securities
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
$
$
176
$
(1,234) $
—
116
292
(24)
(314)
$
(1,572) $
(1,058)
(24)
(198)
(1,280)
F-59
NOTE 13. – REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
The following provides information on noninterest income categories that contain ASC 606 Revenue for the periods indicated.
(dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts
ASC 606 revenue items
Debit card interchange fees
Overdraft fees
Other service charges on deposit accounts
Total ASC 606 revenue included in service charges on deposits accounts
Total service charges on deposit accounts
Other service charges, commissions and fees
ASC 606 revenue items
ATM fees
Total ASC 606 revenue included in other service charges, commission and fees
Other
Total other service charges, commission and fees
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
$
$
$
18,909
$
18,945
$
21,710
10,173
50,792
18,267
8,916
46,128
50,792
$
46,128
$
3,228
$
2,721
$
3,228
685
2,721
338
3,913
$
3,059
$
16,086
17,736
8,232
42,054
42,054
2,575
2,575
308
2,883
The following provides information on net gains (losses) recognized on the sale of OREO for the periods indicated.
(dollars in thousands)
Net gains (losses) recognized on sale of OREO
NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
10
$
(459) $
850
The income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income consists of the following:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
$
$
21,994
5,328
19,639
3,182
—
50,143
$
$
27,714
1,375
496
878
—
30,463
$
33,074
5,230
3,874
(5,069)
13,625
50,734
(dollars in thousands)
Current – federal
Current - state
Deferred - federal
Deferred - state
Remeasurement of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at reduced federal
corporate tax rate
F-60
The Company’s income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rates to
income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences is as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Federal income statutory rate
Tax at federal income tax rate
Change resulting from:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
21 %
21 %
35 %
$
44,433
$
31,813
$
43,499
State income tax, net of federal benefit
Tax-exempt interest
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
Nondeductible merger expenses
Other
Remeasurement of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at reduced
federal corporate tax rate
Provision for income taxes
7,389
(2,911)
(581)
(108)
799
1,122
1,965
(3,095)
(382)
(602)
1,002
(238)
—
50,143
$
—
30,463
$
$
(680)
(4,390)
(556)
(939)
—
175
13,625
50,734
The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Deferred tax assets
Allowance for loan losses
Deferred compensation
Deferred gain on interest rate swap
Nonaccrual interest
Purchase accounting adjustments
Other real estate owned
Net operating loss tax carryforward
Tax credit carryforwards
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale
FDIC-assisted transaction adjustments
Capitalized costs, accrued expenses and other
Lease liability
Deferred tax liabilities
Premises and equipment
Mortgage servicing rights
Subordinated debentures
Goodwill and intangible assets
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap
Right of use lease asset
$
December 31,
2019
2018
$
9,596
3,459
39
107
21,104
4,556
18,775
3,701
—
2,060
4,840
10,619
78,856
12,211
25,990
7,226
15,756
5,430
—
10,063
76,676
7,222
3,467
56
107
13,144
2,980
19,277
1,655
2,792
2,501
2,535
—
55,736
4,597
3,716
5,259
7,017
—
21
—
20,610
Net deferred tax asset
$
2,180
$
35,126
At December 31, 2019, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $74.47 million which
expire at various dates from 2027 to 2035. At December 31, 2019, the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $74.84 million which expire at various dates from 2027 to 2035. The federal net operating loss carryforwards are
subject to limitations pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and are expected to be recovered over the next 16
years. The state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to similar limitations and are expected to be recovered over the
next 16 years. Deferred tax assets are recognized for net operating losses because the benefit is more likely than not to be
realized.
F-61
The Company did not record any interest and penalties related to income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018
and 2017, and the Company did not have any amount accrued for interest and penalties at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of the various states. The
Company is no longer subject to examination by federal taxing authorities for years before 2016 and state taxing authorities for
years before 2015.
NOTE 15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has established a retirement plan for eligible employees. The Ameris Bancorp 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan allows
a participant to defer a portion of their compensation and provides that the Company will match a portion of the deferred
compensation. The Plan also provides for non-elective and discretionary contributions. All full-time and part-time employees
are eligible to participate in the Plan provided they have met the eligibility requirements. An employee is eligible to participate
in the Plan after 30 days of employment and having attained an age of 18 years.
The aggregate expense under the Plan charged to operations during 2019, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $4.4 million, $2.9
million and $2.2 million, respectively.
NOTE 16. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company and the Bank have entered into separate deferred compensation arrangements and supplemental executive
retirement plans with certain executive officers and directors. The plans call for certain amounts payable at retirement, death or
disability. The estimated present value of the deferred compensation is being accrued over the expected service period. The
Company and the Bank have purchased life insurance policies which they intend to use to fund these liabilities. The cash
surrender value of the life insurance was $175.3 million and $104.1 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The
Company and the Bank assumed certain split dollar agreements in the acquisition of Fidelity which provide for death benefits to
designated beneficiaries of the executive or director. Accrued deferred compensation of $698,000 and $769,000 at
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, is included in other liabilities. Accrued supplemental executive retirement plan and
split dollar agreement liabilities of $9.5 million and $5.5 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, is also included
in other liabilities. Aggregate compensation expense under the plans was $386,000, $739,000 and $1.4 million per year for
2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which is included in salaries and employee benefits.
NOTE 17. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company awards its employees and directors various forms of share-based incentives under certain plans approved by its
shareholders. Awards granted under the plans may be in the form of qualified or nonqualified stock options, restricted stock,
stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), long-term incentive compensation units consisting of cash and common stock, or any
combination thereof within the limitations set forth in the plans. The plans provide that the aggregate number of shares of the
Company’s common stock which may be subject to award may not exceed 1,200,000 subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances to prevent dilution. At December 31, 2019, there were 699,992 shares available to be issued under the plans.
All stock options have an exercise price that is equal to the closing fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date the
options were granted. Options granted under the plans generally vest over a five-year period and have a 10-year maximum
term. Most options granted since 2005 contain performance-based vesting conditions.
The Company did not grant any options during 2019, 2018 or 2017. As of December 31, 2019, there was no unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted related to performance or non-
performance-based options. During 2019, the Company assumed 576,588 fully vested options in the Fidelity acquisition.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company has 182,401 outstanding restricted shares granted under the plans as compensation to
certain employees and directors. These shares carry dividend and voting rights. Sales of these shares are restricted prior to the
date of vesting, which is one to five years from the date of the grant. Shares issued under the plans are recorded at their fair
market value on the date of their grant. The compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting
period. In 2019, 2018 and 2017, compensation expense related to these grants was approximately $3.4 million, $6.2 million,
and $3.3 million, respectively. The total income tax benefit related to these grants was approximately $113,000, $818,000 and
$698,000 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Approximately $460,000 of the compensation expense recorded for the year
ending December 31, 2019 for restricted stock awards was related to performance-based restricted stock that was not yet
F-62
granted as of December 31, 2019, and was therefore recorded in other liabilities rather than in shareholders' equity on the
Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.
It is the Company’s policy to issue new shares for stock option exercises and restricted stock rather than issue treasury
shares. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the options’ related vesting
term. The Company did not record any share-based compensation expense related to stock options during 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The total income tax benefit related to stock options was approximately $0, $24,000 and $248,000 in 2019, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
The fair value of each share-based compensation grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
A summary of the activity of non-performance-based and performance-based options as of December 31, 2019 is presented
below.
Non-Performance-Based
Performance-Based
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Shares
Under option, beginning of
year
Granted
Options assumed pursuant to
acquisition of Fidelity
Exercised
Forfeited
Under option, end of year
Exercisable at end of year
— $
—
—
—
576,588
(189,395)
—
387,193
387,193
$
$
26.62
26.85
—
26.51
26.51
$
7,711
—
—
(7,711)
—
— $
— $
6.94
—
—
6.94
—
—
—
$
$
$
2,437
6,208
6,208
1.91
1.91
$
229
— $
— $
—
—
A summary of the activity of non-performance-based and performance-based options as of December 31, 2018 is presented
below.
Non-Performance-Based
Performance-Based
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Shares
Under option, beginning of
year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Under option, end of year
Exercisable at end of year
$
47,294
—
(47,294)
—
— $
— $
14.76
—
14.76
—
—
—
37,013
—
(29,014)
(288)
7,711
7,711
$
$
$
7.36
—
7.47
7.47
6.94
6.94
$
653
— $
— $
—
—
$
$
$
0.11
0.11
217
308
308
A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted stock awards as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018
is presented below.
Nonvested shares at beginning of year
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested shares at end of year
2019
2018
$
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
43.40
39.35
32.52
44.93
44.04
Shares
161,746
125,022
(63,072)
(41,295)
182,401
$
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
33.24
53.37
33.21
49.52
43.40
Shares
277,815
89,855
(195,344)
(10,580)
161,746
F-63
The balance of unearned compensation related to restricted stock grants as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was
approximately $3.7 million, $3.3 million, and $4.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019, the cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
NOTE 18. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Cash Flow Hedge
During 2010, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to lock in a fixed rate as opposed to the contractual variable
interest rate on certain junior subordinated debentures. The interest rate swap contract has a notional amount of $37.1 million
and is hedging the variable rate on certain junior subordinated debentures described in Note 10 of the consolidated financial
statements. The Company receives a variable rate of the 90-day LIBOR rate plus 1.63% and pays a fixed rate of 4.11%. The
swap matures in September 2020.
This contract is classified as a cash flow hedge of an exposure to changes in the cash flow of a recognized liability. At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the remaining instrument totaled a liability of $187,000 and an asset of
$102,000, respectively. As a cash flow hedge, the change in fair value of a hedge that is deemed to be highly effective is
recognized in other comprehensive income and the portion deemed to be ineffective is recognized in earnings. As of
December 31, 2019, the hedge is deemed to be highly effective. Interest expense recorded on this swap transaction totaled
$(10,000), $122,000, and $484,000 during 2019, 2018, and 2017 and is reported as a component of interest expense on other
borrowings. At December 31, 2019, the Company expected $187,000 of the unrealized loss to be reclassified as an increase of
interest expense during the next 12 months.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives
The Company maintains a risk management program to manage interest rate risk and pricing risk associated with its mortgage
lending activities. This program includes the use of forward contracts and other derivatives that are used to offset changes in
value of the mortgage inventory due to changes in market interest rates. As a normal part of its operations, the Company enters
into derivative contracts such as forward sale commitments and IRLCs to economically hedge risks associated with overall
price risk related to IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value. These mortgage banking derivatives are not
designated in hedge relationships. At December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $288.5 million of IRLCs and $1.81
billion of forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans. The fair value of these mortgage banking
derivatives was reflected as a derivative asset of $7.8 million and a derivative liability of $4.5 million. At December 31, 2018,
the Company had approximately $81.8 million of IRLCs and $163.2 million of forward commitments for the future delivery of
residential mortgage loans. The fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives was reflected as a derivative asset of $2.5
million and a derivative liability of $1.3 million. Fair values were estimated based on changes in mortgage interest rates from
the date of the commitments. Changes in the fair values of these mortgage-banking derivatives are included in net gains on sales
of mortgage loans.
The net gains (losses) relating to free-standing mortgage banking derivative instruments used for risk management are
summarized below as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
(dollars in thousands)
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans held for
sale
Interest rate lock commitments
Location
Mortgage banking
activity
Mortgage banking
activity
December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
December 31,
2017
$
$
(4,471) $
(1,276) $
(12)
7,814
$
2,537
$
2,833
F-64
The following table reflects the amount and market value of mortgage banking derivatives included in the consolidated balance
sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
Included in other assets:
Interest rate lock commitments
Total included in other assets
Included in other liabilities:
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans held for sale
Total included in other liabilities
NOTE 19. FAIR VALUE MEASURES
2019
2018
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
288,490
288,490
1,814,669
1,814,669
$
$
$
$
7,814
7,814
4,471
4,471
$
$
$
$
81,833
81,833
163,189
163,189
$
$
$
$
2,537
2,537
1,276
1,276
The fair value of an asset or liability is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a
forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no
quoted market prices for the Company’s various assets and liabilities. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair
value is based on discounted cash flows or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by the
assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not
be realized in an immediate settlement of the asset or liability. The accounting standard for disclosures about the fair value
measures excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly,
the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.
The Company's loans held for sale under the fair value option are comprised of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
Mortgage loans held for sale
SBA loans held for sale
Total loans held for sale
December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
1,647,900
8,811
1,656,711
$
$
107,428
3,870
111,298
The Company has elected to record mortgage loans held for sale at fair value in order to eliminate the complexities and inherent
difficulties of achieving hedge accounting and to better align reported results with the underlying economic changes in value of
the loans and related hedge instruments. This election impacts the timing and recognition of origination fees and costs, as well
as servicing value, which are now recognized in earnings at the time of origination. Interest income on mortgage loans held for
sale is recorded on an accrual basis in the consolidated statement of income under the heading interest income – interest and
fees on loans. The servicing value is included in the fair value of the IRLCs with borrowers. The mark to market adjustments
related to mortgage loans held for sale and the associated economic hedges are captured in mortgage banking activities. Net
gains of $37.7 million, $4.1 million and $4.6 million resulting from fair value changes of these mortgage loans were recorded in
income during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. A net loss of $9.3 million, a net gain of $1.8
million and a net loss of $3.0 million resulting from changes in the fair value and the related derivative financial instruments
used to hedge exposure to the market-related risks associated with these mortgage loans were recorded in income during the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These amounts do not reflect changes in fair values of related
derivative instruments used to hedge exposure to market-related risks associated with these mortgage loans. The change in fair
value of both mortgage loans held for sale and the related derivative instruments are recorded in mortgage banking activity in
the consolidated statements of income. The Company’s valuation of mortgage loans held for sale incorporates an assumption
for credit risk; however, given the short-term period that the Company holds these loans, valuation adjustments attributable to
instrument-specific credit risk is nominal.
F-65
The following table summarizes the difference between the fair value and the principal balance for mortgage loans held for sale
measured at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
Aggregate fair value of mortgage loans held for sale
Aggregate unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans held for sale
Past due loans of 90 days or more
Nonaccrual loans
Unpaid principal balance of nonaccrual loans
December 31,
2019
2018
$
1,647,900
$
1,598,057
107,428
103,319
1,649
1,649
1,616
—
—
—
The following table summarizes the difference between the fair value and the principal balance for SBA loans held for sale
measured at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
Aggregate fair value of SBA loans held for sale
Aggregate unpaid principal balance of SBA loans held for sale
Past due loans of 90 days or more
Nonaccrual loans
December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
8,811
8,206
—
—
3,870
3,581
—
—
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine
fair value disclosures. Securities available for sale, loans held for sale and derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair
value on a recurring basis. From time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a
nonrecurring basis, such as impaired loans and OREO. Additionally, the Company is required to disclose, but not record, the
fair value of other financial instruments.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities
are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its assets and liabilities
recorded at fair value and for estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
Cash and Due From Banks, Federal Funds Sold and Interest-Bearing Deposits in Banks, and Time Deposits in Other
Banks: The carrying amount of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks, and time
deposits in other banks approximates fair value.
Investment Securities Available for Sale: The fair value of securities available for sale is determined by various valuation
methodologies. Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the
valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted
prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include certain U.S. agency bonds,
mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage and debt obligations, and municipal securities. The Level 2 fair value
pricing is provided by an independent third party and is based upon similar securities in an active market. In certain cases where
Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy and may include certain
residual municipal securities and other less liquid securities.
F-66
Loans Held for Sale: The Company records loans held for sale at fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is determined
on outstanding commitments from third party investors in the secondary markets and is classified within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy.
Loans: The fair value for loans held for investment is estimated using an exit price methodology. An exit price methodology
considers expected cash flows that take into account contractual loan terms, as applicable, prepayment expectations, probability
of default, loss severity in the event of default, recovery lag and, in the case of variable rate loans, expectations for future
interest rate movements. These cash flows are present valued at a risk adjusted discount rate, which considers the cost of
funding, liquidity, servicing costs, and other factors. Because observable quoted prices seldom exist for identical or similar
assets carried in loans held for investment, Level 3 inputs are primarily used to determine fair value exit pricing. The fair value
of impaired loans is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows or underlying collateral values, where applicable. A
loan is determined to be impaired if the Company believes it is probable that all principal and interest amounts due according to
the terms of the note will not be collected as scheduled. The fair value of impaired loans is determined in accordance with ASC
310-10, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, and generally results in a specific reserve established through a
charge to the provision for loan losses. Losses on impaired loans are charged to the allowance when management believes the
uncollectability of a loan is confirmed. Management has determined that the majority of impaired loans are Level 3 assets due
to the extensive use of market appraisals.
Other Real Estate Owned: The fair value of OREO is determined using certified appraisals and internal evaluations that value
the property at its highest and best uses by applying traditional valuation methods common to the industry. The Company does
not hold any OREO for profit purposes and all other real estate is actively marketed for sale. In most cases, management has
determined that additional write-downs are required beyond what is calculable from the appraisal to carry the property at levels
that would attract buyers. Because this additional write-down is not based on observable inputs, management has determined
that OREO should be classified as Level 3.
Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable
approximates fair value.
Deposits: The carrying amount of demand deposits, savings deposits and variable-rate certificates of deposit approximates fair
value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using interest
rates currently being offered for certificates of similar maturities.
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Borrowings: The carrying amount of securities sold under
agreements to repurchase approximates fair value and is classified as Level 1. The carrying amount of variable rate other
borrowings approximates fair value and is classified as Level 1. The fair value of fixed rate other borrowings is estimated based
on discounted contractual cash flows using the current incremental borrowing rates for similar borrowing arrangements and is
classified as Level 2.
Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures: The fair value of the Company’s trust preferred securities is based on
discounted cash flows using rates for securities with similar terms and remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2.
FDIC Loss-Share Payable: Because the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain acquired loans should the Company
experience a loss, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset is
recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the same basis, subject to collectability or contractual
limitations. The shared loss agreements on the acquisition date reflect the reimbursements expected to be received from the
FDIC, using an appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties. The shared loss
agreements continue to be measured on the same basis as the related indemnified loans, and the loss-share receivable is
impacted by changes in estimated cash flows associated with these loans.
Pursuant to the clawback provisions of the loss-sharing agreements for the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the
Company may be required to reimburse the FDIC should actual losses be less than certain thresholds established in each loss-
sharing agreement. The amount of the clawback provision for each acquisition is measured and recorded at fair value. The
clawback amount, which is payable to the FDIC upon termination of the applicable loss-sharing agreement, is discounted using
an appropriate discount rate.
Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments: Because commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are typically made using
variable rates and have short maturities, the carrying value and fair value are immaterial for disclosure.
F-67
Derivatives: The Company has entered into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. The valuation of these
instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected
cash flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and
uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair value of the derivatives is
determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted
expected variable cash payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward
curves derived from observable market interest rate curves).
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the
respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative
contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit
enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative fall within Level 2 of the fair
value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of
current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself or the counterparty. However, as of December 31, 2019 and
2018, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its
derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of its
derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and
the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
U.S. government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
SBA pool securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Loans held for sale
Mortgage banking derivative instruments
Total recurring assets at fair value
Financial liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments
Mortgage banking derivative instruments
Total recurring liabilities at fair value
Recurring Basis
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2019
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$
22,362
$
— $
22,362
$
105,260
52,999
73,912
1,148,870
1,656,711
7,814
3,067,928
187
4,471
4,658
$
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
105,260
51,499
73,912
1,148,870
1,656,711
7,814
— $
3,066,428
— $
—
— $
187
4,471
4,658
$
$
$
—
—
1,500
—
—
—
—
1,500
—
—
—
F-68
(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Recurring Basis
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2018
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
State, county and municipal securities
$
150,733
$
— $
150,733
$
Corporate debt securities
SBA pool securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Loans held for sale
Derivative financial instruments
Mortgage banking derivative instruments
Total recurring assets at fair value
Financial liabilities:
Mortgage banking derivative instruments
Total recurring liabilities at fair value
67,314
77,804
896,572
111,298
102
2,537
1,306,360
1,276
1,276
$
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
65,814
77,804
896,572
111,298
102
2,537
— $
1,304,860
— $
— $
1,276
1,276
$
$
$
—
1,500
—
—
—
—
—
1,500
—
—
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, as well as
the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans carried at fair value
Other real estate owned
Purchased other real estate owned
Total nonrecurring assets at fair value
(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans carried at fair value
Other real estate owned
Purchased other real estate owned
Total nonrecurring assets at fair value
Nonrecurring Basis
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2019
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
43,788
2,289
15,000
61,077
$
$
— $
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
— $
43,788
2,289
15,000
61,077
Nonrecurring Basis
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2018
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
28,653
$
408
9,535
38,596
$
— $
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
— $
28,653
408
9,535
38,596
$
$
$
$
The inputs used to determine estimated fair value of impaired loans include market conditions, loan term, underlying collateral
characteristics and discount rates. The inputs used to determine fair value of other real estate owned include market conditions,
estimated marketing period or holding period, underlying collateral characteristics and discount rates.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was not a change in the methods and significant assumptions used to
estimate fair value.
F-69
The following table shows significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of Level 3 assets.
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2019
Recurring:
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable
Inputs
Range of
Discounts
Weighted
Average
Discount
Investment securities available for sale
$
1,500
Discounted par values
Credit quality of
underlying issuer
0%
0%
Nonrecurring:
Impaired loans
Other real estate owned
$
43,788
Third party appraisals
and discounted cash
flows
$
2,289
Third party appraisals
and sales contracts
Purchased other real estate owned
$
15,000
Third party appraisals
Collateral
discounts and
discount rates
Collateral
discounts and
estimated
costs to sell
Collateral
discounts and
estimated
costs to sell
1% - 95%
27%
15% - 31%
25%
9% - 89%
31%
As of December 31, 2018
Recurring:
Investment securities available for sale
$
1,500
Discounted par values
Credit quality of
underlying issuer
0%
0%
Nonrecurring:
Impaired loans
Other real estate owned
$
28,653
Third party appraisals
and discounted cash
flows
$
408
Third party appraisals
and sales contracts
Purchased other real estate owned
$
9,535
Third party appraisals
Collateral
discounts and
discount rates
Collateral
discounts and
estimated
costs to sell
Collateral
discounts and
estimated
costs to sell
3% - 53%
30%
15% - 69%
31%
6% - 74%
39%
F-70
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, not shown elsewhere in these financial
statements, were as follows.
(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing accounts
Time deposits in other banks
Loans, net
Accrued interest receivable
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
FDIC loss-share payable
Accrued interest payable
(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing accounts
Time deposits in other banks
Loans, net
Accrued interest receivable
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
FDIC loss-share payable
Accrued interest payable
NOTE 20. LEASES
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2019
Carrying
Amount
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$
$
246,234
375,615
249
12,736,499
52,362
$
246,234
375,615
—
—
—
— $
—
249
— $
—
—
— 12,806,709
47,183
246,234
375,615
249
12,806,709
52,362
5,179
14,027,073
20,635
1,398,709
127,560
19,642
11,524
— 14,035,686
—
1,402,510
126,815
—
11,524
20,635
—
—
—
—
— 14,035,686
20,635
—
1,402,510
—
126,815
—
19,657
19,657
11,524
—
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2018
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
172,036
507,491
—
—
—
—
20,384
—
—
—
—
$
— $
—
10,812
—
5,456
— $
—
—
8,365,293
31,514
172,036
507,491
10,812
8,365,293
36,970
9,645,617
—
152,873
90,180
—
5,669
—
—
—
—
19,576
—
9,645,617
20,384
152,873
90,180
19,576
5,669
Carrying
Amount
$
$
172,036
507,491
10,812
8,454,442
36,970
9,649,313
20,384
151,774
89,187
19,487
5,669
Operating lease cost was $10.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the
Company had no sublease income offsetting operating lease cost. Variable rent expense and short-term lease expense were not
material for the year ended December 31, 2019. Rental expense measured under ASC 840, Leases, amounted to approximately
$7.9 million and $4.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The following table presents the impact of leases on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019:
(dollars in thousands)
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Operating lease liabilities
Location
Other assets
Other liabilities
December 31,
2019
$
39,321
42,262
F-71
Future maturities of the Company's operating lease liabilities are summarized as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total lease payments
Less: Interest
Present value of lease liabilities
Supplemental lease information
(dollars in thousands)
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Weighted-average discount rate
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases (cash payments)
Operating cash flows from operating leases (lease liability reduction)
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for leases entered into during the period, net of business
combinations
NOTE 21. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Loan Commitments
Lease Liability
$
11,818
9,988
7,346
5,320
3,285
7,538
45,295
(3,033)
42,262
$
$
December 31,
2019
5.1
2.56 %
9,910
10,244
5,826
$
$
$
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit. They involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the
same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. A
summary of the Company’s commitments is as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit
Unused home equity lines of credit
Financial standby letters of credit
Mortgage interest rate lock commitments
$
December 31,
$
2019
2,486,949
262,089
29,232
288,490
2018
1,671,419
112,310
24,596
81,833
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established
in the contract. These commitments, predominantly at variable interest rates, generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being
drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral
obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the
customer.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk
involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Collateral is
required in instances which the Company deems necessary. The Company has not been required to perform on any material
F-72
financial standby letters of credit and the Company has not incurred any losses on financial standby letters of credit for the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Other Commitments
As of December 31, 2019, letters of credit issued by the FHLB totaling $82.4 million were used to guarantee the Bank’s
performance related to a portion of its public fund deposit balances.
Contingencies
The Company is, and has been, involved in various legal proceedings with William J. Villari, who formerly owned USPF, and
entities that Mr. Villari owns. First, on December 13, 2018, Mr. Villari filed a demand for arbitration, claiming that the Bank’s
termination of his employment for “cause” was improper and that he was entitled to additional compensation from the
Company and the Bank under his employment agreement. Second, on December 28, 2018, Mr. Villari and his wholly owned
company, P1 Finance Holdings LLC (“P1”), filed a lawsuit against the Bank in Broward County, Florida, seeking additional
compensation for his service while an employee, as well as other relief. Third, on May 30, 2019, CEBV LLC (“CEBV”),
which also is wholly owned by Mr. Villari, filed a lawsuit against the Bank in Duval County, Florida, arising out of a loan
purchase agreement with the Bank dated May 8, 2018. CEBV’s complaint in that lawsuit, which also names as a defendant the
Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Dennis J. Zember Jr., seeks unspecified damages and other relief related to asserted
claims for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract based on the Bank’s alleged failure to provide sufficient assistance to
CEBV in collecting on loans purchased by CEBV from the Bank.
In addition, on January 30, 2019, the Company and the Bank filed a lawsuit against Mr. Villari in Dekalb County, Georgia,
asserting claims for unspecified damages arising from Mr. Villari’s alleged failure to disclose material information in
connection with the sale of USPF to the Company and the Bank.
In the first of these proceedings to be adjudicated, the Company and the Bank received on November 20, 2019, an Order and
Award from the American Arbitration Association in which the arbitrator ruled that the Company and the Bank had cause to
terminate Mr. Villari and had properly exercised that right and that, as a result, Mr. Villari is not entitled to any additional
payments under his employment agreement or a separate management and licensing agreement with the Bank.
We believe the remaining allegations of Mr. Villari, P1 and CEBV in their complaints are without merit, and we are vigorously
defending the cases. We believe that the amount or any estimable range of reasonably possible or probable loss in connection
with these matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of
operations or financial condition of the Company.
On November 19, 2019, the Company received a subpoena from the Atlanta Regional Office of the SEC, and the Bank received
a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia, each requesting that the
Company and the Bank produce documents and other materials relating to the Company’s acquisition of USPF, the Bank’s sale
of certain loans to CEBV and related disclosures. The Company intends to cooperate fully with the investigation and is
currently producing documents in response to the subpoenas. The Company is unable to make any assurances regarding the
outcome of the investigation or the impact, if any, that the investigation may have on the Company’s business, consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Furthermore, from time to time, the Company and the Bank are subject to various legal proceedings, claims and disputes that
arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company and the Bank are also subject to regulatory examinations, information
gathering requests, inquiries and investigations in the ordinary course of business. Based on the Company’s current knowledge
and advice of counsel, management presently does not believe that the liabilities arising from these legal matters will have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, it is
possible that the ultimate resolution of these legal matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of
operations and financial condition for any particular period.
The Company’s management and its legal counsel periodically assess contingent liabilities, which may result in a loss to the
Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur, and such assessment
inherently involves an exercise of judgment.
In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending
against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of
any legal proceedings or unasserted claims, as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the
sought therein.
amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If
F-73
the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable
but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if
determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they
involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the guarantee would be disclosed.
NOTE 22. REGULATORY MATTERS
The Bank is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be declared without prior regulatory
approval. At December 31, 2019, $93.1 million of retained earnings were available for dividend declaration without regulatory
approval.
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary,
actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Bank’s financial
statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the
Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-
sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain
minimum amounts and ratios of total, Tier 1 capital and Common Equity Tier 1 capital, as defined by the regulations, to risk-
weighted assets, as defined, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets, as defined. The final rules implementing the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (the “Basel III rules”) became effective for the
Company on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and
fully phased in by January 1, 2019. Under the Basel III rules, the Company must hold a capital conservation buffer above the
adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer is being phased in from 0.0% for 2015 to 2.50%
by 2019. The capital conservation buffer for 2019 is 2.500%. The capital conservation buffer for 2018 was 1.875%. The net
realized gain or loss on available for sale securities is not included in computing regulatory capital. Management believes that,
as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the most recent notification from the regulatory authorities categorized the Bank as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must
maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth
in the following table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the
Bank’s category. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
F-74
The Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.
Actual
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2019
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (tier 1 capital to average
assets):
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$ 1,437,991
$ 1,649,699
8.476 % $
9.733 % $
678,650
677,973
4.000 %
4.000 % $
847,446
—N/A—
5.00 %
CET1 Ratio (common equity tier 1 capital to risk
weighted assets):
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (tier 1 capital to risk weighted
assets):
$ 1,437,991
$ 1,649,699
9.925 % $ 1,014,173
11.394 % $ 1,013,485
7.000 %
7.000 % $
941,094
—N/A—
6.50 %
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$ 1,437,991
$ 1,649,699
9.925 % $ 1,231,495
11.394 % $ 1,230,661
8.500 %
8.500 % $ 1,158,269
—N/A—
8.00 %
Total Capital Ratio (total capital to risk weighted
assets):
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$ 1,874,817
$ 1,763,965
12.940 % $ 1,521,259
12.183 % $ 1,520,228
10.500 %
10.500 % $ 1,447,836
—N/A—
10.00 %
As of December 31, 2018
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (tier 1 capital to average
assets):
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$
984,620
$ 1,127,926
9.166 % $
10.506 % $
429,690
429,428
4.000 %
4.000 % $
536,785
—N/A—
5.00 %
CET1 Ratio (common equity tier 1 capital to risk
weighted assets):
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (tier 1 capital to risk weighted
assets):
$
895,433
$ 1,127,926
10.070 % $
12.716 % $
566,859
565,486
6.375 %
6.375 % $
576,573
—N/A—
6.50 %
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$
984,620
$ 1,127,926
11.073 % $
12.716 % $
700,237
698,541
7.875 %
7.875 % $
709,629
—N/A—
8.00 %
Total Capital Ratio (total capital to risk weighted
assets):
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
$ 1,087,364
$ 1,156,745
12.229 % $
13.041 % $
878,075
875,948
9.875 %
9.875 % $
887,036
—N/A—
10.00 %
The December 31, 2019 The CET1 Ratios, the Tier 1 Capital Ratios, and the Total Capital Ratios displayed in the above table
under the heading “For Capital Adequacy Purposes” include a capital conservation buffer of 2.500% for December 31, 2019
and 1.875% for December 31, 2018.
F-75
NOTE 23. SEGMENT REPORTING
The following table presents selected financial information with respect to the Company’s reportable business segments for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
Banking
Division
Retail
Mortgage
Division
Warehouse
Lending
Division
SBA
Division
Premium
Finance
Division
(dollars in thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment expenses
Data processing and communications expenses
Other expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
$
$
478,340
59,327
419,013
12,654
69,005
130,134
35,281
34,934
149,919
350,268
125,096
31,609
93,487
$
$
88,129
43,577
44,552
3,472
118,188
82,470
4,666
2,418
12,536
102,090
57,178
12,202
44,976
$
$
22,370
9,753
12,617
67
1,999
934
5
156
223
1,318
13,231
2,778
10,453
$
$
$
$
34,820
12,867
21,953
3,021
6
5,617
375
973
4,561
11,526
7,412
1,734
5,678
12,735
5,704
7,031
544
8,915
4,783
269
32
1,651
6,735
8,667
1,820
6,847
267,273
Total
636,394
131,228
505,166
19,758
198,113
223,938
40,596
38,513
168,890
471,937
211,584
50,143
161,441
$
$
$18,242,579
931,637
$
91,586
$
Total assets
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
$13,063,461
867,139
$
73,737
$
$ 3,636,321
$
$
$
— $
— $
527,527
$
— $
— $
$ 747,997
64,498
17,849
— $
— $
(dollars in thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment expenses
Data processing and communications expenses
Other expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
Banking
Division
Retail
Mortgage
Division
Warehouse
Lending
Division
SBA
Division
Premium
Finance
Division
$
$
323,757
38,199
285,558
4,486
58,694
100,716
26,112
27,026
71,788
225,642
114,124
23,607
90,517
$
$
37,146
13,686
23,460
584
48,260
39,469
2,440
1,425
6,998
50,332
20,804
4,335
16,469
$
$
14,522
5,434
9,088
—
2,021
547
2
122
238
909
10,200
2,142
8,058
$
$
7,672
2,617
5,055
1,137
4,858
2,709
234
19
1,298
4,260
4,516
948
3,568
$
$
30,229
9,998
20,231
10,460
4,579
5,691
343
1,793
4,677
12,504
1,846
(569)
2,415
$
$
Total
413,326
69,934
343,392
16,667
118,412
149,132
29,131
30,385
84,999
293,647
151,490
30,463
121,027
Total assets
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
$ 9,290,437
438,144
$
37,836
$
$ 1,153,615
$
$
$
— $
— $
360,839
$
— $
— $
F-76
139,671
$ 498,953
65,290
20,853
— $
— $
$11,443,515
503,434
$
58,689
$
(dollars in thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment expenses
Data processing and communications expenses
Other expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Total assets
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
Banking
Division
Retail
Mortgage
Division
Warehouse
Lending
Division
SBA
Division
Premium
Finance
Division
Total
294,347
34,222
260,125
8,364
104,457
119,783
24,069
27,869
60,215
231,936
124,282
50,734
73,548
$
$
$
5,293
1,549
3,744
(111)
6,277
2,893
215
21
971
4,100
6,032
2,111
3,921
$
28,924
4,726
24,198
731
112
4,507
197
962
8,629
14,295
9,284
3,257
6,027
101,737
$ 486,399
— $
— $
$ 7,856,203
125,532
13,496
— $
— $
$
$
231,111
20,392
210,719
6,787
51,416
78,857
21,436
25,177
46,192
171,662
83,686
36,518
47,168
$ 6,431,151
125,532
$
13,496
$
$
$
$
$
$
21,318
5,731
15,587
771
44,913
32,996
2,217
1,611
4,260
41,084
18,645
6,526
12,119
$
$
7,701
1,824
5,877
186
1,739
530
4
98
163
795
6,635
2,322
4,313
$
$
598,355
$
— $
— $
238,561
$
— $
— $
F-77
NOTE 24. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF AMERIS BANCORP (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31, 2019 and 2018
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Investment in subsidiaries
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Other liabilities
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Total liabilities
Shareholders' equity
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
2019
2018
$
$
$
$
102,392
2,688,952
16,667
2,808,011
19,220
191,649
127,560
338,429
2,469,582
2,808,011
$
$
$
$
6,977
1,684,810
9,169
1,700,956
11,496
143,926
89,187
244,609
1,456,347
1,700,956
Condensed Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands)
Income
Dividends from subsidiaries
Other income
Total income
Expense
Interest expense
Other expense
Total expense
Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Income tax benefit
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Net income
2019
2018
2017
$
67,200
493
67,693
$
46,000
4,726
50,726
—
132
132
16,264
12,199
28,463
39,230
5,603
44,833
116,608
161,441
$
12,670
8,578
21,248
29,478
5,051
34,529
86,498
121,027
$
9,065
4,612
13,677
(13,545)
10,622
(2,923)
76,471
73,548
$
$
F-78
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
2019
2018
2017
$
161,441
$
121,027
$
73,548
Share-based compensation expense
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Increase (decrease) in interest payable
Decrease (increase) in tax receivable
Provision for deferred taxes
Gain on sale of equity security
Other operating activities
Total adjustments
Net cash provided by operating activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of equity security
Repayment of advances to subsidiary bank
Investment in subsidiary
Net cash proceeds received from (paid for) acquisitions
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock
Purchase of treasury shares
Dividends paid common stock
Proceeds from other borrowings
Repayment of other borrowings
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for interest
Cash paid (received) during the year for income taxes
3,424
(116,608)
33
(6,860)
1,595
(61)
(2,396)
(120,873)
40,568
282
10,000
—
34,939
45,221
—
(18,410)
(24,675)
117,572
(70,000)
5,139
9,626
6,241
(86,498)
313
1,436
195
—
(2,051)
(80,364)
40,663
—
—
—
(90,542)
(90,542)
—
(2,062)
(16,405)
70,000
—
914
52,447
95,415
6,977
102,392
$
2,568
4,409
6,977
$
3,316
(76,471)
1,142
5,176
(4,620)
—
1,230
(70,227)
3,321
—
—
(110,000)
—
(110,000)
88,656
(886)
(14,650)
73,692
(38,850)
2,669
110,631
3,952
457
4,409
16,173
$
— $
12,357
$
(7,500) $
7,923
(11,000)
$
$
$
F-79
NOTE 25. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)
The following tables set forth certain consolidated quarterly financial information of the Company for 2019 and 2018. During
the third quarter of 2019, the Company recorded $65.2 million of pre-tax merger and conversion charges. During the second
quarter of 2018, the Company recorded $18.4 million of pre-tax merger and conversion charges and $5.5 million of pre-tax
executive retirement benefits.
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Income Statement Data
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Other noninterest expense
Merger and conversion charges
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Per Share Data
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common dividends - cash
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Income Statement Data
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Other noninterest expense
Merger and conversion charges
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Per Share Data
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common dividends - cash
Three Months Ended
December 31,
2019
September
30, 2019
June 30, 2019
March 31,
2019
$
$
$
$
$
$
194,076
38,725
155,351
5,693
149,658
55,113
120,149
2,415
82,207
20,959
61,248
0.88
0.88
0.15
$
$
$
188,361
39,592
148,769
5,989
142,780
76,993
127,539
65,158
27,076
5,692
21,384
0.31
0.31
0.15
$
$
$
129,028
27,377
101,651
4,668
96,983
35,236
77,776
3,475
50,968
12,064
38,904
0.82
0.82
0.10
124,929
25,534
99,395
3,408
95,987
30,771
73,368
2,057
51,333
11,428
39,905
0.84
0.84
0.10
Three Months Ended
December 31,
2018
September
30, 2018
June 30, 2018
March 31,
2018
$
$
$
$
$
$
122,749
23,195
99,554
3,661
95,893
30,470
74,813
997
50,553
7,017
43,536
0.92
0.91
0.10
$
$
$
121,119
22,081
99,038
2,095
96,943
30,171
72,077
276
54,761
13,317
41,444
0.87
0.87
0.10
$
$
$
89,946
13,947
75,999
9,110
66,889
31,307
67,995
18,391
11,810
2,423
9,387
0.24
0.24
0.10
79,512
10,711
68,801
1,801
67,000
26,464
58,263
835
34,366
7,706
26,660
0.70
0.70
0.10
F-80
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Date: March 9, 2020
AMERIS BANCORP
By:
/s/ H. Palmer Proctor, Jr.
H. Palmer Proctor, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in their capacities indicated on March 9, 2020.
/s/ H. Palmer Proctor, Jr.
H. Palmer Proctor, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
/s/ Nicole S. Stokes
Nicole S. Stokes, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(principal accounting and financial officer)
/s/ William I. Bowen, Jr.
William I. Bowen, Jr., Director
/s/ Rodney D. Bullard
Rodney D. Bullard, Director
/s/ Wm. Millard Choate
Wm. Millard Choate, Director
/s/ R. Dale Ezzell
R. Dale Ezzell, Director
/s/ Leo J. Hill
Leo J. Hill, Director
/s/ Daniel B. Jeter
Daniel B. Jeter, Director
/s/ Robert P. Lynch
Robert P. Lynch, Director
/s/ Elizabeth A. McCague
Elizabeth A. McCague, Director
(Continued)
F-81
/s/ James B. Miller, Jr.
James B. Miller, Jr., Executive Chairman
/s/ Gloria A. O'Neal
/ Gloria A. O'Neal, Director
/s/ William H. Stern
William H. Stern, Director
/s/ Jimmy D. Veal
Jimmy D. Veal, Director
(Concluded)
F-82
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 183
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
☒
☐
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number
001-13901
AMERIS BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia
(State of incorporation)
58-1456434
(IRS Employer ID No.)
3490 Piedmont Road N.E., Suite 1550, Atlanta, Georgia 30305
(Address of principal executive offices)
(404) 639-6500
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $1 per share
ABCB
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller
reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☒
☐
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
☐
☐
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange
Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the
voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.82 billion.
As of February 29, 2020, the registrant had outstanding 69,336,749 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.
None
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Explanatory Note
This Form 10-K/A amends Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the
"Original Filing"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2020 (the "Original Filing Date").
We are filing this Form 10-K/A to amend the report of Crowe LLP ("Crowe") relating to the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting included in Item 15 of the Original Filing (the "Audit Report") to include certain omitted
language on the exclusion of Fidelity Southern Corporation from the scope of Crowe's audit of internal control over financial
reporting. This amendment to the Audit Report does not affect Crowe's unqualified opinion on our consolidated financial
statements or Crowe's adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2019.
In addition to amending the Audit Report as described above, Part IV, Item 15 of the Form 10-K/A includes: (1) a new consent
of Crowe as Exhibit 23.1 thereto; and (2) new certifications of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer as Exhibits
31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2 thereto.
No other changes were made to the Original Filing. This Form 10-K/A speaks as of the Original Filing Date, does not reflect
events that may have occurred subsequent to the Original Filing Date and, except as described above, does not modify or update
in any way disclosures made in the Original Filing.
Exhibit No.
Description
EXHIBIT INDEX
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 16, 2017 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Atlantic
Coast Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 17, 2017).
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 29, 2017 by and between Ameris Bancorp and William J.
Villari (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration No. 333-223080) filed with the SEC on February 16, 2018).
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 25, 2018 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Hamilton
State Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2018).
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 25, 2018 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank,
William J. Villari and The Villari Family Gift Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2018).
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 17, 2018 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Fidelity
Southern Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on December 17, 2018).
Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed with the SEC on August 14, 1987).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 1999).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2003).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 1, 2005).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 21, 2008).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 1, 2011).
Bylaws of Ameris Bancorp, as amended and restated through July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company dated September 20, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-138252) filed with the SEC on October 27, 2006).
Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture dated September 20, 2006 to Ameris
Statutory Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-138252) filed with the SEC on October 27, 2006).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and U.S. Bank
National Association dated as of March 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2033 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas dated as of June 24, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Note Due 2034 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.8 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of January 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of January 31, 2006)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2036 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of September 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity
Banking Company and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of September 20, 2007)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2037 (included as
Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.18 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Coastal Bankshares, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association dated as of August 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Ameris Bancorp and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association (pertaining to Indenture dated as of August 27, 2003) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2033 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit
4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Coastal Bankshares, Inc.) and U.S. Bank National
Association dated as of December 14, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Coastal Bankshares,
Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association (pertaining to Indenture dated as of December 14, 2005)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 1, 2014).
5
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2035 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit
4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated)
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of March 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 22, 2015 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Merchants &
Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of
March 17, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2035 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
May 27, 2015).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated)
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of March 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 22, 2015 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Merchants &
Southern Banks of Florida, Incorporated and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of
March 30, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2036 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
May 27, 2015).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of June 17, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Jacksonville
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2034 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2016).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of September 15, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Jacksonville
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2035 (included as
Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of December 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Jacksonville
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
6
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2036 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2016).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association dated as of June 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 11, 2016 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2038 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit
4.10 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016).
Subordinated Debt Indenture dated as of March 13, 2017 by and between Ameris Bancorp and Wilmington
Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2017).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 13, 2017, by and between Ameris Bancorp and Wilmington
Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2017).
Form of 5.75% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Note due 2027 (included as Exhibit A to the First
Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on March 13, 2017).
Indenture dated as of November 10, 2005 by and between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Hamilton State
Bancshares, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 2, 2018).
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 29, 2018 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Hamilton State
Bancshares, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 2, 2018).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture (included as Exhibit A to the
Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 2,
2018).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Fidelity Southern Corporation) and U.S. Bank National
Association, dated as of June 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
First Supplemental Indenture, among Ameris Bancorp, Fidelity Southern Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, dated as of July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2033 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1,
2019).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Fidelity Southern Corporation) and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of March 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
First Supplemental Indenture, among Ameris Bancorp, Fidelity Southern Corporation and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
7
4.50
4.51
4.52
4.53
4.54
4.55
4.56#
4.57#
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*
10.5*
10.6*
10.7*
10.8*
10.9*
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2035 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1,
2019).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Fidelity Southern Corporation) and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of August 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
First Supplemental Indenture, among Ameris Bancorp, Fidelity Southern Corporation and Wilmington Trust
Company, dated as of July 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2037 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1,
2019).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 6, 2019, by and between Ameris Bancorp and
Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris
Bancorp's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 6, 2019).
Form of 4.25% Fixed-to-Floating Subordinated Notes due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 6, 2019).
Form of Global Note representing Fixed/Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030
Description of the Registrant's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Jon S. Edwards, dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Cindi H. Lewis, dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on
November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Nicole S. Stokes, dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 1, 2018).
Ameris Bancorp 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to
Ameris Bancorp’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 17, 2014).
Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement by and between Ameris Bank and Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
dated as of November 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q
filed with the SEC on November 9, 2016).
8
10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
10.15*
First Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement by and between Ameris Bank and Cindi
H. Lewis dated as of November 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form
10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2016).
Retirement Agreement dated June 6, 2018 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Edwin W.
Hortman, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2018).
Form of Severance Protection and Restrictive Covenants Agreement for executive officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 10, 2019).
Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and James B. Miller, Jr. dated as of
December 17, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed with the
SEC on August 9, 2019).
Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and H. Palmer Proctor, Jr. dated as of
December 17, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed with the
SEC on August 9, 2019).
Amendment to Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and H. Palmer Proctor,
Jr. dated as of June 30, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ameris Bancorp's Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC on August 9, 2019).
10.16* #
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Lawton E. Bassett, III, dated as of November 7, 2012.
10.17* #
Form of Performance Stock Unit Grant Agreement.
21.1#
Schedule of Subsidiaries of Ameris Bancorp.
23.1**
Consent of Crowe LLP.
31.1**
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
31.2**
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer.
32.1**
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
32.2**
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer.
101.INS**
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its
XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH**
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL**
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF**
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB**
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE**
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104**
Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data
File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
* Management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement.
** Filed herewith.
# Previously filed as an exhibit to the Original Filing.
9
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Crowe LLP
Independent Member Crowe Global
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ameris Bancorp
Atlanta, Georgia
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Ameris Bancorp and Subsidiaries' (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on
criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). In our opinion, because of the effects of the material weakness discussed in the following paragraph, the Company has not
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The following material weakness has been identified and included in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Subsequent
to the conversion of Fidelity’s core system to Ameris’s core system on November 3, 2019, certain balance sheet account
reconciliations were being prepared, but reconciling items were not being researched and cleared in a timely manner.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes
(collectively referred to as the "financial statements") and our report dated March 9, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion. We considered the
material weakness identified above in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures applied in our audit of the 2019 financial
statements, and this report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting does not affect such report on the financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. As permitted, the
Company has excluded the operations of Fidelity Southern Corporation acquired during 2019, from the scope of management's report on internal
control over financial reporting. As such, it has also been excluded from the scope of our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Crowe LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 9, 2020
F-4
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
AMERIS BANCORP
Date: March 20, 2020
By:
/s/ H. Palmer Proctor, Jr.
H. Palmer Proctor, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
F-81
Common Stock and Dividend Information
Ameris Bancorp Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “ABCB.”
The following table sets forth the dividends declared and the low and high sales prices for the common stock as
quoted on Nasdaq during 2019.
CALENDAR PERIOD
SALES PRICE
_________________________________________________________________________________
Low
2019
High
$31.27 $42.01
First Quarter
$33.57 $39.60
Second Quarter
$33.71 $40.65
Third Quarter
$38.34 $44.90
Fourth Quarter
$0.10
$0.10
$0.15
$0.15
DIVIDENDS
Shareholder Services
Computershare is Ameris Bancorp’s stock transfer agent and administers all matters related to our stock.
You may contact them via:
First Class, Registered or Certified Mail:
Overnight Delivery:
Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 505000
Louisville, KY 40233-5005
Computershare Investor Services
462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600
Louisville, KY 40202
Shareholder Services Number: (800) 568-3476
Investor Centre™ portal: www.computershare.com/investor
If your shares are held in a brokerage account, please contact your broker or financial advisor.
Availability of Information
Upon written request, Ameris Bancorp will provide, without charge, a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including the financial statements and the financial statement schedules, required to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year 2019.
Please direct requests to:
Ameris Bancorp
Investor Relations
P.O. Box 105075
Atlanta, GA 30348
investor.relations@amerisbank.com
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ameris Bancorp is scheduled for Thursday, June 11, 2020,
at 9:30 a.m. (ET), at Two Ameris Center, 3500 Piedmont Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30305, in the first floor
conference room. However, in the interest of the health and well-being of our shareholders in light of the
coronavirus (COVID-19), we are planning for the possibility that the Annual Meeting may be held solely
by means of remote communication. Details regarding any changes impacting the Annual Meeting
will be provided at www.amerisbank.com.
Mixed Sources: Produced
using sustainable methods with
materials from well-managed
forests, controlled sources or
recycled wood or fi ber.
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 195
HRHHODH
EOD
RH
SOUTH CAROLINA
Beaufort
Charleston
Columbia
Greenville
Irmo
Lexington
Mt. Pleasant
Summerville
In addition to states with
full-service banking locations,
Ameris Bank’s mortgage
division also conducts business
in Maryland, North Carolina,
Tennessee and Virginia.
The company’s government
guaranteed lending and
premium finance divisions
conduct business in all states
across the continental United
States.
ATLANTA
COLUMBIA
C
SOUTH
CAROLINA
ALABAMA
MONTGOMERY
GEORGIA
CHARLES
ESTON
SAV
AVANNAH
MOULTRIE
TALLAHASSEE
TALLA
JACKSONV
JACKS
JACK
VILLE
FLORIDA
ALABAMA
Abbeville
Dothan
Eufaula
FLORIDA
13 Greater Jacksonville
Locations
Blountstown
Bradenton
Crawfordville
Cross City
GEORGIA
73 Metro Atlanta
Locations
Albany
Athens
Brunswick
Buena Vista
Butler
Cairo
Colquitt
Cordele
Doerun
Defuniak Springs
Donalsonville
Gainesville
High Springs
Keystone Heights
Lake City
Lake Mary
Live Oak
Lynn Haven
Macclenny
Melrose
Ocala
Orange City
Orlando
Ormond Beach
Palatka
Palm Coast
Palmetto
Panama City
St. Augustine
Tallahassee
Trenton
Winter Garden
196 | AMERIS BANK
Douglas
Dublin
Ellaville
Fitzgerald
Greensboro
Hinesville
Hoschton
Jekyll Island
Macon
Moultrie
Ocilla
Pooler
Quitman
Richmond Hill
Rincon
Savannah
St. Marys
St. Simons Island
Thomasville
Tifton
Valdosta
Vidalia
Waycross
HRHHODH
EOD
RH
AMERIS BANK’S REACH
ATLANTA
C
COLUMBIA
SOUTH
CAROLINA
ALABAMA
MONTGOMERY
GEORGIA
CHARLES
ESTON
SAV
AVANNAH
MOULTRIE
TALLA
TALLAHASSEE
JACKS
JACKSONV
JACK
VILLE
Full-Service Banking Locations
Ameris Bank and Ameris Bancorp
Headquarters
FLORIDA
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | 197
Kenneth “Jack” Hunnicutt
Ameris Bancorp’s 2019 annual report is dedicated to
Kenneth “Jack” Hunnicutt, who passed away in early 2020.
As Ameris Bank’s first president and chief executive officer,
serving for over 30 years, Jack established our foundation
and paved the way for our company’s journey and future.
His legacy is honored daily as we carry on his tireless
energy, credit discipline, commitment to our communities
and interest in mergers and acquisitions. Jack’s vision and
dedication to our company positioned Ameris Bank to be
the high performing bank it is today.
P.O. Box 105075 | Atlanta, Georgia 30348
amerisbank.com
002CSNAC02 ANNUAL REPORT/10K WRAP