Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Biotechnology / Aura Biosciences, Inc.

Aura Biosciences, Inc.

aura · NASDAQ Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker aura
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Healthcare
Industry Biotechnology
Employees 106
← All annual reports
FY2016 Annual Report · Aura Biosciences, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ACN: 115 927 681

ACN: 115 927 681

ANNUAL REPORT

30 JUNE 2016

ANNUAL REPORT

30 JUNE 2016

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

DIRECTORS
Peter Reeve - Executive Chairman
Bob Beeson - Non-Executive Director
Brett Fraser - Non-Executive Director
Julian Perkins - Non-Executive Director

NOMINATED ADVISOR AND  
AIM BROKER
WH Ireland Limited
24 Martin Land
London, England

AUDITOR
Bentleys London House
Level 3, 216 St Georges Tce
Perth, WA 6000

SOLICITORS
Steinepreis Paganin
Level 4, The Read Building
16 Milligan Street
Perth, WA 6000

COMPANY SECRETARY
John Madden

REGISTERED OFFICE
Aura Energy
Level 1, 34-36 Punt Road
Windsor VIC 3181
Telephone: +61 3 9516 6500
Facsimile: +61 3 9516 6565
Website: www.auraenergy.com.au

SHARE REGISTRY
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd
Level 2, Reserve Bank Building
45 St Georges Terrace
Perth, WA 6000
Telephone: 1300 557 010
Facsimile: 08 9323 2033
Email:  
web.queries@computershare.com.au

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16AboUt Us / CoNtENts 1

ABOUT US

Aura Energy is an Australian based development company that has  
major uranium projects in Europe and Africa also gold, lithium and  
soda ash in Africa 

Aura Energy Limited is a resource-
development Company building high 
quality mineral projects for the future. Aura 
is very positive about its uranium projects 
and nuclear energy industry as 80 million 
people are added to the world’s population 
annually driving the world’s energy needs 
exponentially. Aura intends to be part of 
that solution by supplying uranium from  
its projects to the nuclear industry.

Aura has an exceptionally strong technical 
and management team with unparalleled 
experience and exposure for a company 
of Aura’s size. This experience has lead 
Aura to broaden its mineral portfolio and 
secure excellent gold, soda ash and lithium 
projects in 2016. This balances Aura’s 
strategy and will provide a depth  
of projects to create cashflow from 
different commodities.

Previously Aura has stated a strategy to 
get its projects into production quickly 
and with minimal dilution. Despite a 
challenging uranium market Aura has 
continued to progress this goal with a  
successful listing on the London Stock 
Exchange AIM market which has more 
than trebled Aura’s market value during 
September 2016. Additionally,  
Aura has pursued corporate alliances, 
closed the glaring valuation gap between 
Aura and its peers, commenced the push 
for offtake funding and maintained a 
strong imperative to progress its Tiris  
and Häggån projects.

2016 has seen Aura progress on a new 
journey to sustainable development and 
cashflow. We invite shareholders to stay 
with the company for the 2017 financial 
year and beyond, as Aura continues this 
new path.

27 
Financial statements 
67  Directors’ Declaration
68 
70 
73 

Independent Auditor’s Report
Additional Information
Tenement Report

CONTENTS

About Us
Our projects
Highlights in 2016
Chairman’s Letter
Operation’s Review

1 
2 
3 
4 
6 
14  Directors’ report
26 

Auditor’s Independence Declaration 

2

OUR PROJECTS

100% OWNED URANIUM 
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 
IN MAURITANIA AND 
SWEDEN
TIRIS MAURITANIA – POTENTIAL 
PRODUCTION & CASHFLOW
•  C1 Cash costs US$30/lb U3O8

•  49 Mlbs Indicated and Inferred 

Resource

•  US$45m capital cost

•  Early stage exploration

HÄGGÅN SWEDEN –POTENTIAL 
SCALE/LONG TERM VALUE

•  C1 Cash costs US$13.50/lb U3O8 

including credits

•  803 Mlbs Inferred Resource

•  US$537m capital cost 
•  Gold, Soda Ash, Lithium

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16HigHtLigHts iN 2015/16 3

HIGHLIGHTS IN 2016

Aura advanced the company in 2016 by broadening its 
portfolio, advancing its studies, establishing a new London 
market place and increasing its market value

EXPANDED 
PORFOLIO IN  
GOLD
LITHIUM
SODA ASH

LISTED ON 
AIM RAISED

£2.85m

(A$5.0M)

MANAGEMENT 
HAS EXTENSIVE 
RESOURCES 
EXPERIENCE

583%

INCREASE IN 
MARKET
CAPITALISATION  
(OR VALUE)
$5M to $29.2M

ACTIVITY OVERVIEW
MAURITANIA
•  Commenced Tiris project 

Feasability Study

•  Completed drilling and leach 

testwork

SWEDEN
•  Conducted drilling on Haggan  

and Marby

•  Planned for community 
engagement program

•  Refined understanding of Tiris 

•  Continued liasion with government

project mineralisation

•  Secured excellent gold tenements 
south of the giant Tasiast Gold 
Mine

•  Secured Soda Ash and Lithium 

tenements

•  Continued interaction in  

local community

4

CHAIRMAN’S LETTER

Aura is developing two attractive, 100% owned, uranium 
projects with resources totalling 852 million pounds U3o8 
which the Aura board believes will position the company 
as a major uranium producer in the future. 

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16CHAirMAN's LEttEr 5

The new AIM listing and exceptionally 
well funded position provides Aura 
with a new platform from which to 
develop its projects and search for new 
opportunities. Aura’s focus remains the 
creation of shareholder value as we 
progress our projects to sustainable 
cashflow.

Peter Reeve

Executive Chairman

Dated this Thursday, 29 September 
2016

Aura Energy Limited (‘Aura’ or the 
‘Company’) is developing two 
attractive, 100% owned, uranium 
projects with resources totalling 
852 million pounds U3O8 which the 
Aura Board believes will position the 
company as a major uranium producer 
in the future. 

The Tiris project in Mauritania is in 
Feasibility Study and with its low 
capital cost has a potentially short 
development time frame. The second 
asset, the Häggån project, is a world 
class, strategic European uranium 
deposit located in Sweden.

Aura maintained a focus during 2016 
on getting the Tiris project Feasibility 
Study completed in order to achieve 
production and cashflow from the 
asset in the shortest timeframe. The 
continued weakness in both the 
uranium price and the junior mining 
sector made funding difficult and 
as such hampered Aura’s efforts to 
progress the Feasibility Study.

To address this issue the Company 
took the strategic step to review a 
more relevant market to fund Aura’s 
projects and commenced a programme 
to list on the London Stock Exchange 
owned AIM market. Subsequent to 
year end, the Company successfully 
completed that listing with the 
following key outcomes:

•  Completion of equity raising of  
A$5 million (£2.85 million);

•  Establishment of a presence 

in a market knowledgeable of 
African and European projects; 
and

•  support from new cornerstone 

investors

Aura continued to pursue development 
for both its uranium projects however 
as new exploration opportunities 
arose Aura took the opportunity to 
broadened its portfolio into other 
minerals and prospects aligned with 
the existing business. The first of these 
was two excellent gold tenements in 
Mauritania just south of the giant 21 
million ounce Tasiast gold mine and 
the second a soda ash and lithium 
prospects near the Tiris project. 

Aura believes the new gold properties 
to be particularly prospective on 
a poorly explored belt and with 
substantial previous expenditure by 
previous owners Aura will be able 
to commence exploration with a 
distinct head start. Other explorers 
on this belt such as Algold Resources 
have recently had excellent results 
and Aura has high expectations it 
can match these outcomes. The soda 
ash and lithium prospects are also 
aligned with our business as soda 
ash is the key chemical required to 
leach the uranium ore in Tiris. If a 
soda ash source could be identified 
near to the project then the already 
low cost of Tiris production would fall 
even further. If a lithium credit was 
also capable of being additionally 
extracted then this would ensure 
lower costs again.

The junior sector has been a difficult 
place to operate over the past few 
years and survival alone is a success. 
Aura can now say it has thrived in 
this environment and I would like 
to thank shareholders, both old and 
new, for their recent support as that 
support has allowed Aura to prosper 
and advance. I also like to thank our 
staff and board for their efforts in our 
recent success.

6

OPERATION’S REVIEW

2016 was a year of two halves with a slower than 
expected level of activity initially followed a very 
successful London AiM listing and financing which 
allowed planning to commence for a restart of the  
tiris project Feasibility study and a move into gold,  
soda ash and lithium. 

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16opErAtioN’s rEviEw 7

production rate of approximately 800,000 
pound U3O8 over 15 years. Internal studies 
suggest there is protential for Aura to 
produce 3 million pounds U3O8 per annum. 

Aura initially commenced the Feasibility 
Study for its Tiris project in Mauritania in 
2015 and continued activities during 2016. 
However the weak funding environment 
hampered Aura’s ability to progress the 
Feasibility Study which resulted in work 
programmes being slowed towards the 
end of 2015.

Prior to this weak funding environment 
Aura was focused on validation work to 
tighten the grade/tonnage confidence 
limits. This assessment is ongoing and 
will require additional field testwork in 
2017. Orebody models were constructed 
in order for new resource estimates to be 
quickly concluded when the validation 
work programme on the 2015 drilling 
programme is completed.

There are a number of natural attributes 
of the Tiris project which derive from 
the very fine nature of the uranium 
mineral, carnotite. This allows a simple 
beneficiation step of washing and 
screening to achieve an upgrade of up to 
700% to the leach feed U3O8 grade. This in 
turn leads to a project that has:

•  A very small physical footprint 

•  No grinding – reduced construction 

and operating costs

•  Easily scalable – modular, assembly 

on-site

The resulting capital and operating costs 
are US$45 million and US$30 per pound 
U3O8 which are both extremely competitive 
in this environment and compete well with 
the in-situ leach uranium projects which 
are also well known for low capital and 
operating costs.

The key to low cash costs at the Tiris project 
is the:

•  Shallow mining at 1- 5 metres depth 

•  Ore upgrades by 500 - 700% - from  
335 ppm to circa 2,500 ppm U3O8 

•  Excellent leach recovery and 
resident rate - 94% in 4 hours

The project financial outcomes from the 
Scoping Study were;

•  Pre-tax cashflow (15 years) : A$360 
million using US$65 pounds U3O8  
@ 90 cents AUD

• 

IRR of 78% before tax and royalties

Importantly, the Scoping Study financials 
only account for approximately 20% of the 
known resources, providing excellent upside 
in the project economics and presenting 
a strong case for further expansion. Initial 
modelling of expansion cases has been 
undertaken and indicate a potential for a 
very robust financial outcome.

Two important aspects of work on the Tiris 
project to be undertaken are:

•  Modelling of expansion cases for 
Tiris project including a 3 million 
pounds U3O8 per annum 

•  Exploration of Hippolyte South to 

provide a growth option for the Tiris 
project

2016 was a year of two halves with a 
slower than expected level of activity 
initially followed a very successful London 
AIM listing and financing which allowed 
planning to commence for a restart of the 
Tiris Feasibility Study. As the Tiris project 
work programmes slowed during the year 
under review, the AIM listing became the 
major focus of the Company. However 
more broadly Aura expanded its portfolio 
to include a package of very prospective 
gold tenements and also soda ash and 
lithium prospects. On balance 2015-16 was 
a frustrating year with weak commodity 
and equity markets but ended well leaving 
Aura in an excellent position for the 
coming few years.

In the 2015 Report the Company 
commented that;

Fundraising became central to the 
company during the year as the push to 
achieve project status is unrelenting and 
expensive. The need to find a reliable 
and sustainable source of funding to 
continue on this development path is 
very important to Aura and remained 
unfulfilled at year end.

Significantly I am pleased to report that 
Aura’s efforts since the end of the financial 
year have resulted in the completion of a 
$5 million financing and the establishment 
of a new market place in the UK which 
clearly has a strong appreciation of African 
and European projects.

The completion of this task is important in 
realising a sustainable funding path for all 
of Aura’s projects but in particular the near 
term Tiris project.

TIRIS PROJECT –  
100% MAURITANIA

The Tiris project is an excellent near-
term development project and Aura’s key 
opportunity to produce significant cash 
flow and returns for shareholders in the 
coming 2-3 years.

The Tiris project has progressed to the 
Feasibility Study stage and this study 
envisages a project with an initial 
production profile up to 1 million 
pound U3O8 per annum with preliminary 
economics developed for the Scoping 
Study indicating an average life of mine 

Figure 1: Location of Tiris project Uranium Resources

8

Aura has highlighted the very fine nature 
of the uranium-bearing mineral, carnotite, 
is one of the key positive attributes of the 
Tiris project as it is the basis of the low 
cost beneficiation processes which are key 
to the attractive economics of the project. 
However, this fine-grained character, 
together with the high short-range grade 
variability inherent in deposits of this 
type, presents challenges in sampling and 
handling analogous to those in a nuggetty 
high grade gold deposit.

The carnotite in calcrete deposits tends 
to occur as small lenses, nuggets and 
coatings in or on the calcrete. Their 
distribution varies from deposit to deposit. 
Calcrete uranium deposits are typically 
lens-like in section, and hundreds of square 
meters in plan view. 

Aura has seen significant grade 
variability in all its sampling programs, 
a common feature of deposits of this 
type. However, this inherent variability 
requires understanding and management 
in upgrading resources to Measured 
and Indicated status where tight grade 
tolerance is required. In general, variability 
reduces as sample size increases, and for 
that reason the 2015 drilling employed 
a larger diameter drill bit to that used in 
the earlier resource drilling programmes 
resulting in a 50% greater sample size. 
However, even with the larger sample  
size grade variability has still been 
relatively high.

During 2015-16 Aura continued to conduct 
testwork and validation work aimed at 
defining optimal protocols for the recovery 
of adequately representative samples. This 
work will continue in 2016-17 and whilst 
it is time consuming and expensive, it is 
important it is undertaken now so that 
Aura can optimise its material handling 
and sampling protocols to ensure the best 
project outcomes during operation.

In order to attain the high level of 
confidence required for the grade applied 
in Measured Resources estimates, which  
is generally considered to be around  

+/- 10%, and given the inherent high grade 
variability in calcrete deposits, further 
verification/validation programmes are 
under contemplation and planning.  
These include:

•  Downhole gamma logging

•  Disequilibrium testwork

•  Trenching of the mineralisation

•  Detailed ground radiometric 

surveying

Aura is continuing to progress the 
Feasibility Study for the Tiris project with 
a current date for completion by the end 
of 2017.

TIRIS DEVELOPMENT STATEGY
SIMPLE PATH TO CASHFLOW – ‘Perfect World Scenario’

TIRIS POTENTIAL 
PRODUCTION LATE 2018

TIRIS CONSTRUCTION     
START END 2017 

TIRIS FEASIBILITY 
STUDY IN 12 MONTHS

CONTINUE TO ASSESS NEW OPPORTUNITIES  

2016

2017

2018

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16opErAtioN’s rEviEw 9

HÄGGÅN PROJECT – 100% SWEDEN

The Häggån project is one of the world’s 
largest undeveloped uranium deposits 
and is strategically located within Western 
Europe.

With an Inferred Resource of 803 million 
pounds U3O8, the deposit is an important 
source of uranium for Europe and 
potentially Sweden, which is 50% nuclear 
dependent for electricity, and therefore 
provide energy self-sufficiency for many 
decades.

Aura believes that whilst the Häggån 
project is a large and relatively expensive 
project undertaking it is also an extremely 
valuable project which, in due course, will 
be profitable long-life mine in one of the 
most stable countries in the world.

During 2015-16 planning on the Häggån 
Project was undertaken to commence a 
programme of community engagement 
on the project including presentations on 
both the regional benefits of the project 
and the operating aspects of the project. 

TASIAST SOUTH GOLD PROSPECT
Given Aura’s strong technical team it has 
maintained a readiness to purchasing 
further assets which it considers to be 
aligned with its existing business. 

As a result towards the end of the financial 
year Aura secured the rights to acquire 
175 km2 of prospective gold tenements 
covering two under-explored mineralised 
greenstone belts in Mauritania. The areas 
lie along strike from Kinross’ giant 21 Moz 
Tasiast gold mine and also from Algold’s 
Tijirit gold project. The two areas are 
currently held under exploration permit 
applications and are expected to be 
granted in the near future.

These highly prospective gold areas 
represent an excellent opportunity in 
lightly explored Archean greenstone 
belts and will leverage Aura’s extensive 
operating experience in this part of the 
world.

The tenements are favourably located  
200 km from Nouakchott, 60 km 
from the coast, and can be managed 
efficiently within the company’s existing 
management resources without distraction 
from Aura’s core uranium focus. 

The tenements cover portions of the 
Tasiast and Tijirit greenstone belts and 
have only been explored previously by 
one other company which was forced to 
suspend activities in the mineral industry 
downturn in 2012, despite having located 
zones of significant gold mineralisation. 
Members of Aura’s current technical team 
were involved in this previous work and 
are well acquainted with the area.

Previous exploration for gold on these 
permit areas also located strongly 
anomalous nickel values in several areas, 
associated with ultramafic rocks. In parts 
of the tenements high nickel values 
are associated with anomalous copper 
highlighting potential for nickel-copper 
sulphide mineralisation, as occurs in the 
greenstone belts of Australia and Canada. 
At this stage there has been no follow-up 
work carried out on these nickel targets. 

Aura’s Tasiast South project area has the 
following attributes:

•  Tenements over two lightly 

explored greenstone belts covering 
175 km2

•  The 20 Moz Tasiast gold mine is 
nearby on the same greenstone 
belt and highlights the potential 
for major deposits in the region 
(See Fig 2)

•  $3 million has been expended by 
the previous explorer on airborne 
geophysics, reverse circulation and 
air-core drilling, and sampling

•  Broad zones of gold mineralisation 
have been identified with strong 
similarities to the Tasiast gold mine 
mineralisation and alteration

• 

 No testing deeper than 150m with 
most previous holes less than 
100m

•  High grade drill intersections 

have been reported by others in 
the district from both past and 
current programme, including 
one programmes in progress with 
Algold Resources (a TSX-listed 
entity), which highlight the current 
interest and potential in these 
poorly tested belts

Next steps envisaged at the Tasiast South 
project are:

•  Ground electrical geophysics 
to locate the strongest zones 
of disseminated sulphide 
development for drill targeting

•  Additional bedrock sampling by 

air-core or auger-drilling to better 
define the high nickel ultramafics 
and zones of copper/nickel for 
follow up drilling

•  Deep drill testing of targets defined

10

SODA ASH AND LITHIUM SABKHA
Similar to its gold acquisition a Sabkha 
(salt pan) was identified during the 
Competent Persons Review of Aura 
Energy’s projects for the AIM listing by the 
Independent Expert, Wardell Armstrong 
International Limited (WAI). 

Tenements covering two large Sabkhas 
(salt pans) in the region of its Tiris project 
have been applied for with a view to 
exploring this formation for soda ash 
and other minerals. Soda ash is the leach 
agent proposed for the Tiris project and if 
the source is confirmed it would provide 
significant benefits to the Tiris project 
economics. Importantly Sabkha’s are also 
known sources of other minerals including 
lithium. 

The WAI review noted;

“On the return trip from the Tiris East 
uranium project, the route crosses a very 
wet clay-rich “pan” or Sabkha. The surface 
and geological setting of the pan was 
strongly reminiscent of pans known to Mr 
Moseley in other parts of Africa that are 
being investigated for lithium and other 
valuable salts.”

The Sabkhas which are 165 km from 
Hippolyte are large on a relative basis 
covering an area of over 85 km2. Sabkha 
is an Arabic name for a salt-flat that has 
come into general use in sedimentology. 
They are also known as “Salars” in South 
America and generically as salt pans or 
flats. The valuable salts can occur in the 
Sabkha environment either in clays at or 
near surface or in brine reservoirs deeper 
in the lake sediments.

The location of the Sabkha between the 
Tiris project’s east and west tenements 
provides a favourable location should a 
source of soda ash (Na2CO3) be identified. 
The Tiris project 2014 Scoping Study 
identified the need for up to 16,000 tonnes 
of soda ash which, including transport, 
would account for approximately 25% of 
Tiris’ operating costs. Utilising a nearby 
source of soda ash has the potential 
to significantly reduce these costs. 
Additionally potential for revenue from 
other minerals such as lithium or back-
loading soda ash to port for export would 
further reduce the Tiris project operating 
cost.

Sabkha relative to the Aura Uranium Licences

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16opErAtioN’s rEviEw 11

CORPORATE
AIM LISTING
One of Aura’s key activities during the 2016 
year was the pursuit of a London Stock 
Exchange AIM listing and fund raising. On 
Monday, 12th September Energy Limited 
listed on AIM with the stockcode: AURA. 
The listing has been an outstanding 
success with the share price trading at a 
premium since listing and large volumes 
being traded in both markets. With 
the increase in issued capital and the 
increase in the price Aura’s share market 
capitalisation has more than doubled as a 
result of this listing. 

The AIM listing and parallel Australian 
Placement resulted in the Company 
raising £2.85 million (AUD$5.0 million) 
before expenses by way of a placing of 
approximately 254 million new ordinary 
shares at £0.0114 (AUD$0.02) per share. 

Aura Energy has always believed that, 
given our European and African focus, 
dual listing on AIM was both an attractive 
option for Aura and a natural marketplace 
for the company. This decision has been 
vindicated.

GPEC DEVELOPMENT MOU
Aura previously advised that it had entered 
into a Development MoU with China 
Energy Engineering Group Guangdong 
Power Engineering Company Ltd (GPEC) 
on 4th February 2016 which outlined that 
GPEC would provide certain engineering, 
equipment supply services and possible 
finance for development of Tiris project in 
Mauritania.

During the year Aura continued 
negotiations with GPEC and supplied 
them with a detailed engineering 
contract covering all aspects of the GPEC’s 
Engineering Procurement and Construction 
Management (EPCM) role. Since this was 
provided GPEC has undertaken active 
review and the engineering contract 
is in detailed evaluation with five 
separate departments within GPEC and 
is progressing through GPEC’s required 

internal processes.

Aura continues to pursue several parallel 
strategies to ensure development of 
the Tiris project. The MoU with GPEC is 
an important aspect of this search as it 
not only provides a very cost effective 
development option for the high margin 
Tiris project but also provides Aura, and 
the Tiris project broad exposure to the 
extraordinary expansion of the Chinese 
nuclear industry.

Aura’s Development MoU outlines for GPEC 
to provide the following main elements: 

•  EPCM services for the Tiris project

•  Equipment financing for service of 

the Tiris project

•  Procurement services for the Tiris 

project’s major equipment

•  Procurement of required power 

infrastructure for the Tiris project

•  Seek finance parties for completion 
of the Production Finance Package

• 

Introduction of further parties 
for the purpose of investment, 
project construction, processing, 
engineering studies and product 
marketing for the Tiris project

•  Facilitate direct investment by 

Chinese partners to assist with the 
development of the Tiris project

•  Endeavour to introduce parties to 
negotiate offtake agreements for 
the Tiris project

GPEC is an engineering firm based in 
Guangdong China and operates within 
a group of companies under the parent 
company China Energy Engineering Group 
Company Ltd (CEEC). GPEC’s main activities 
are the engineering and construction 
management within the power industry 
having completed several nuclear, coal 
and LNG gas fired power stations as well 
as significant power related infrastructure 
projects.

12

URANIUM MARKET
The World Nuclear Association has stated 
that China presently has 30 nuclear 
reactors in operation and another 24 
under construction.  By 2020-21 China will 
generate 58 GWe from nuclear power and 
150 GWe by 2030. The Chinese nuclear 
power development programme is not 
dependent on Chinese economic growth as 
the development programme is a focused 
government commitment to meet massive 

base load energy demand and to do so in 
an environmentally acceptable manner 
with reduction in air pollution being the 
public policy priority. This development 
agreement with CEEC/GPEC place Aura 
in the group of companies that can take 
advantage of this growth.

As the chart below confirms the 
requirement for new uranium supply is 
significant over the coming years.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16opErAtioN’s rEviEw 13

Aura’s project cash cost versus U308 price

US$/lb U₃O₈
70 

60 

50 

40 

30 

20 

10 

$30/lb 

0 

Tiris 
* Trade Tech Report June 2016

Aura Assumed SS Pricing U₃O₈ ~US$65/lb

Contract U₃O₈ Price – US$42/lb* 

Spot U₃O₈ Price – US$26.10/lb* 

$13.5/lb 

Häggån 

Historical Spot (grey) and LT Contract (blue) sales for U3O8. Note the very low level of contract sales in 2013 and 2014 –  
A potential driver for U3O8 price recovery

14

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Your Directors present their report 
together with the financial statements 
of the Group, being the company and its 
controlled entities, for the financial year 
ended 30 June 2016.

DIRECTORS

The names of Directors in office at  
any time during or since the end of the 
year are:

PETER REEVE
Executive Chairman and  
Managing Director

Peter Reeve has been involved in 
the Australian resources industry 
for approximately 25 years and, as a 
professional metallurgist, has held 
positions with Rio Tinto, Shell-Billiton, 
Newcrest Mining and Normet Consulting. 
For seven years Peter worked at JB Were 
as a Resource Specialist Fund Manager 
and a Resource Corporate Finance Director. 
He has been a management consultant in 
South Africa and was involved in an African 
iron ore start-up.

Peter was Managing Director and Chief 
Executive Officer of Ivanhoe Australia, 
which he co-founded with Robert 
Friedland, and was a Director of both EXCO 
Resources and Emmerson Resources.

Peter’s specialisation is the development 
of company strategy and the 
commercialisation of projects, and 
alignment with the global investment 
community and international resource 
corporations.

DR. BOB BEESON
Non-Executive Director

Dr. Bob Beeson is a professional geologist 
with over 35 years’ experience in mineral 
exploration and development. He has 
held senior management positions with 
Billiton Australia, Acacia Resources, North 
Limited and New Hampton Goldfields 
and has extensive experience in leading 
and managing teams in many regions of 
the world. He was Managing Director of 
Aura Energy Ltd since its listing in 2006 
and in 2015 vacated the position and is 
now Non-Executive Director. He is also a 
Non-Executive Director of Drake Resources 
Limited.

Highlights of Dr. Beeson’s specific uranium 
exploration experience include:

•  Led major geochemical exploration 
programmes for sediment-hosted 
and magmatic uranium deposits 
throughout South Africa;

•  Specialist geochemist in a multi-
national team in the Middle East;

•  Conducted major review and 
targeting programme of the 
Alligator Rivers Uranium field for 
Mobil Energy Minerals;

•  Led Aura’s team that has made 

greenfields uranium discoveries in 
Sweden, West Africa and Western 
Australia.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16DirECtors' rEport 15

BRETT FRASER
Non-Executive Director

JULIAN PERKINS
Non-Executive Director

Mr Fraser is a qualified accountant with 
more than 29 years’ experience in the 
mining, finance and securities industry 
Mr Fraser is an experienced company 
executive having served as a director and 
been involved in governance, negotiation, 
finance, development, forensic accounting 
and operation for a number of private and 
ASX listed companies. As the founder or 
officer of businesses in mining, securities 
trading, the beverage industry, media, 
leisure health and corporate finance Mr 
Fraser has extensive knowledge and 
skills in company operations. Mr Fraser 
is the Non-Executive Chairman of Blina 
Minerals, Non-Executive Chairman of 
Drake Resources Limited, former Chairman 
of Doray Minerals Ltd and the Securities 
Institute Education, WA chapter, and also 
a former director of Gage Roads Brewing 
Co and Brainytoys Limited. Mr Fraser holds 
a Bachelor of Business degree, is a Fellow 
of Certified Practising Accountants, is a 
Fellow of the Financial Services Institute 
of Australasia and has completed post 
graduate studies in finance and marketing.

Mr Julian Perkins has over 40 years’ 
experience in the global minerals industry. 
He has held senior technical management 
positions in Australia for AngloGold Ashanti 
Ltd, Acacia Resources Ltd, Shell Australia, and 
prior to that for Billiton International Metals 
(part of the Shell Group) in the Netherlands. 
He has degrees in mining and metallurgical 
engineering, with operational experience in 
underground mining in South Africa and the 
metallurgical operations at Nchanga on the 
Zambian Copperbelt. He is a Graduate of the 
Australian Institute of Company Directors.

Mr Perkins has extensive experience in 
research and development. He was head of 
the mineral processing department at the 
Arnhem metals research centre of Shell 
Research in the Netherlands for three years. 
In Australia he was Chairman of the Board 
of Parker Centre Ltd, which managed the 
A J Parker Cooperative Research Centre 
(CRC) for Hydrometallurgy from 2006 to 
2012, having been a director prior to that. 
He has also been a director on the boards 
of the Cooperative Research Centre for 
Mining and the Australian Centre for Mining 
Environmental Research. He designed and 
managed the early metallurgical testwork 
and flowsheet design for both of Aura’s 
projects. He has been a non-executive 
director of Aura Energy Limited since 2011.

Directors have been in office since the start 
of the financial year to the date of this 
report unless otherwise stated.

COMPANY SECRETARY

The following person held the position 
of Company Secretary at the end of the 
financial year:

JOHN MADDEN
Company Secretary (from 31 March 2016 to  
30 June 2016)

John started his career with Rio Tinto 
Limited (formerly CRA Limited) and held 
a number of positions in accounting, 
planning, business analysis and taxation 
as well as the acquisitions group. Between 
1996 and 2000, John was the Manager-
Finance for Rio Tinto at the Grasberg 
copper-gold project in West Papua. On 
leaving Rio Tinto in 2000, John worked in 
Papua New Guinea for three years on the 
Hidden Valley/Wafi gold projects feasibility 
studies and for five years on the Tampakan 
copper-gold project in the Philippines 
where he was the General Manager-
Commercial & Company Secretary for 
Indophil Resources NL.

John has provided strategic and 
commercial advice as well as specialist 
financial modelling services to OK Tedi 
Mining Limited, Intrepid Mines Limited, the 
Australian Iron Ore Joint Venture and Mesa 
Minerals Limited from 2008 to 2011.

John has extensive commercial and legal 
experience in Francophone Africa as he  
co-founded Indian Pacific Resources 
Limited, a Madagascar-based iron ore 
explorer and served as an executive officer 
from 2011 to 2015.

SF ZILLWOOD
Company Secretary (from 1 July 2015 to  
31 March 2016) 

16

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND 
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

The principal activities of the Group during the financial year 
were the exploration and evaluation of its projects in Sweden and 
Mauritania.

REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
OPERATION REVIEW
A detailed review of the Group’s exploration activities is set out in 
the section entitled Operations Review on page 6 in this annual 
report.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
STATEMENT

Details of the Company’s corporate governance practices are 
included in the Corporate Governance Statement set out on the 
Company’s website at: www.auraenergy.com.au/governance.html

DIVIDENDS PAID OR RECOMMENDED

There were no dividends paid or recommended during the 
financial year ended 30 June 2016.

OPERATING RESULTS
The consolidated loss for the year amounted to $1,625,775 
(2015: $2,493,900). The decrease in the consolidated loss is 
largely attributable no adjustment to the fair value of exploration 
projects in Mauritania and Sweden (see Note 11 Exploration and 
evaluation assets).

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern 
basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business 
activity and the realisation of assets and the settlement of 
liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Details of the Groups 
assessment in this regard can be found in Note 1. Statement of 
significant accounting policies-Going concern. The auditor’s report 
contains an emphasis on matter in this regard.

FINANCIAL POSITION
The net assets of the Group have increased by $78,881 from  
30 June 2015 to $13,840,706 at 30 June 2016.

As at 30 June 2016, the Group’s cash and cash equivalent 
decreased from 30 June 2015 by $625,253 (including foreign 
exchange movements) to $317,758. The Group had a working 
capital deficit of $297,004 (2015: $500,426 working capital 
surplus). The deficit was negetively impacted by the accruing 
of advisors and consultants costs at balance date which was 
A$136,914.

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE  
OF AFFAIRS

There were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the 
Group during the financial year.

EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING 
DATE

On the 12 and 16 of September 2016, the Company completed the 
listing of its shares on the AIM in London and raised $5 million 
(before costs) at a share price of 2 cents per share. 

LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS

Likely developments, future prospects and business strategies of 
the operations of the Group and the expected results of those 
operations have not been included in this report as the Directors 
believe that the inclusion of such information would be likely to 
result in unreasonable prejudice to the Group.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16DirECtors' rEport 17

INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS

Peter Reeve

Qualifications

Executive Chairman and Managing Director

Bachelor of Applied Sciences.

Experience

Board member since 13 July 2015 with over 30 years’ experience positions with Rio Tinto, Billiton 
Australia and Newcrest Mining as well as experience as a Resource Fund Manager and Resources 
Corporate Finance Director at J B Were & Son. More recently Peter was Chief Executive Officer of Ivanhoe 
Australia Ltd. 

Interest in shares and options

9,718,304 ordinary shares in Aura Energy Limited and 35,000,000 options.

Directorships held in other 
listed entities in last 3 years

Nil

Dr Robert Beeson

Director (Non-executive)

Qualifications

Bachelor of Science with Honours; PhD; Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists

Experience

Board member since 31 March 2006. Geologist with over 35 years of global experience in uranium and 
other commodity management, exploration and development.

Interest in shares and options

5,636,937 ordinary shares in Aura Energy Limited. 

Directorships held in other 
listed entities in last 3 years

Managing Director of Drake Resources Limited from November 2004 until 31 January 2015. Non-executive 
director or Drake Resources Limited since 1 February 2015. No other directorships in the past three years.

Brett Fraser

Director (Non-executive)

Qualifications

Experience

Fellow of Certified Practicing Accountants; Fellow of the Financial Services Institute of Australasia; Grad 
Dip Finance, Securities Institute of Australia; Bachelor of Business (Accounting); International Marketing 
Institute - AGSM Sydney.

Board member since 24 August 2005. 

Interest in shares and options

3,957,600 ordinary shares in Aura Energy Limited. 

Directorships held in other 
listed entities in last 3 years

Current Non-executive director and Chairman of Drake Resources Limited since March 2004, and Non-
executive director and Chairman of Blina Diamonds NL since September 2008. Past director of Doray 
Minerals Limited from October 2009 until November 2011. No other directorships in the past three years.

Julian Perkins

Director (Non-executive)

Qualifications

Master of Science (Imperial College of Science & Technology) 1972; Associate of the Camborne School 
of Metalliferous Mining (Honours) 1967; Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; 
Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.

Board member since 7 June 2011.

Mr. Perkins has over 40 years’ experience in operations and management with major companies in the 
international minerals industry. He was Manager of Mining & Technology (Australia) for AngloGold 
Ashanti Ltd, until 2006. His career includes operating and management roles on the Zambian Copperbelt, 
leading the mineral processing at Shell Research in the Netherlands before returning to corporate 
management in Australia. He was Chairman of Parker Centre Ltd for Hydrometallurgy from 2006 to 2012 
and previously a director of the CRC Mining and the Australian Centre for Mining Environmental Research.

Experience

Interest in shares and options

2,861,990 ordinary shares in Aura Energy Limited. 

Directorships held in other 
listed entities in last 3 years

No other directorships held in other listed entities.

18

MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS

During the financial year the board of directors held six meetings (including committees of directors) with the remainder of meetings 
conducted by way of written resolution. Attendances by each director during the year were as follows:

COMMITTEE MEETINGS

DIRECTORS’ 
MEETINGS

REMUNERATION
COMMITTEE

AUDIT
COMMITTEE

NUMBER ELIGIBLE 
TO ATTEND

NUMBER 
ATTENDED

NUMBER ELIGIBLE 
TO  
ATTEND

NUMBER 
ATTENDED

NUMBER ELIGIBLE 
TO  
ATTEND 

NUMBER 
ATTENDED

6

6

6

6

6

5

6

6

-

1

1

1

-

1

1

1

-

2

2

2

-

2

2

2

PD Reeve

Dr R Beeson

BF Fraser

JC Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS

In the normal course of business, there are no environmental 
regulations or requirements that the Company is subject to.

The directors have considered the enacted National Greenhouse 
and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (the NGER Act) which introduced 
a single national reporting framework for the reporting and 
dissemination of information about the greenhouse gas emissions, 
greenhouse gas projects, and energy use and production of 
corporations. At the current stage of development, the directors 
have determined that the NGER Act has no effect on the Company 
for the current, nor subsequent, financial year. The directors will 
reassess this position as and when the need arises.

NON-AUDIT SERVICES

During the year ended 30 June 2016, taxation consulting services 
were provided to the Company by a party related to the auditors, 
Bentleys. These services amounted to $22,085 (2015: $5,812). 
Details of remuneration paid to the auditor can be found within 
the financial statements at Note 4 Auditor’s remuneration. 

The directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services 
during the year by Bentleys (or by another person or firm on 
Bentley’s behalf) is compatible with the general standard of 
independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001 
(Cth).

INDEMNIFYING OFFICERS OR 
AUDITOR

During or since the end of the financial year the Company has 
given an indemnity or entered into an agreement to indemnify, or 
paid or agreed to pay insurance premiums as follows:

•  The Company has entered into agreements to indemnify 
all directors and provide access to documents, against 
any liability arising from a claim brought by a third party 
against the Company. The agreement provides for the 
Company to pay all damages and costs which may be 
awarded against the directors. 

•  The Company has paid premiums to insure each of the 

directors against liabilities for costs and expenses incurred 
by them in defending any legal proceedings arising out 
of their conduct while acting in the capacity of director of 
the company, other than conduct involving a wilful breach 
of duty in relation to the Company. The amount of the 
premium was $9,092 (2015: $9,515).

•  No indemnity has been paid to auditors of the Group.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16DirECtors' rEport 19

OPTIONS

At the date of this report, the unissued ordinary shares of Aura Energy Limited under option (listed and unlisted) are as follows:

GRANT DATE

DATE OF EXPIRY

EXERCISE PRICE

NUMBER UNDER OPTION

4 December 2012

4 December 2016

8 March 2014

8 March 2017

12 November 2014

12 November 2018

17 June 2015

10 June 2015

10 June 2015

10 June 2015

10 June 2015

10 June 2015

25 November 2015

23 December 2015

5 February 2016

10 May 2016

17 June 2017

9 June 2018

9 February 2019

9 February 2019

9 February 2020

9 February 2021

25 November 2017 

23 December 2017

5 February 2018

9 May 2018

$0.200

$0.048

$0.070

$0.050

$0.100

$0.100

$0.150

$0.150

$0.150

$0.025

$0.025

$0.025

$0.025

200,000

2,600,000

12,500,000

27,226,166

8,750,000

6,250,000

2,500,000

8,750,000

8,750,000

62,111,801

8,163,265

19,979,593

22,943,877

190,724,702

No person entitled to exercise the option has or has any right by virtue of the option to participate in any share issue  
of any other body corporate.

PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF 
COMPANY

No person has applied for leave of Court to bring proceedings 
on behalf of the Company or intervene in any proceedings 
to which the Company is a party for the purpose of taking 
responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or any part of 
those proceedings.

The Company was not a party to any such proceedings during 
the year.

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE 
DECLARATION

The lead auditor’s independence declaration for the year ended 
30 June 2016 has been received and can be found in the annual 
report. 

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED)
REMUNERATION POLICY
The remuneration policy of the Group has been designed to 
align director and management objectives with shareholder 
and business objectives by providing a fixed remuneration 
component, and offering specific long-term incentives based on 
key performance areas affecting the Group’s financial results. 
The board of directors believes the remuneration policy to be 
appropriate and effective in its ability to attract and retain the 
best management and directors to run and manage the Group, as 
well as create goal congruence between directors, executives and 
shareholders.

The policy of the board of directors for determining the nature and 
amount of remuneration for board members and senior executives 
of the Group is described in the following paragraphs.

The remuneration policy of the Group sets the terms and 
conditions for executive directors and other senior executives. Due 
to the rapidly changing circumstances of the Group in recent years, 
the policy is reviewed annually by the board of directors with the 
purpose of maintaining alignment of the board and management 
with the Group’s strategic objectives. Management is also entitled 
to participate in employee share and option arrangements. All 
executives receive a base salary which takes into account such 
factors as length of service and experience, superannuation and 
share based incentive such as options. The board of directors 
reviews executive packages annually by reference to the 
performance of the Group, individual executives and relevant 
comparable remuneration data from similar listed companies and 
appropriate industry sectors. Independent expert advice is sought 
as required.

20

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONT)
The total amount of non-executive directors’ remuneration is proposed by the board of directors from time to time at the Annual General 
Meeting and is subject to formal approval by shareholders. Within this limit, the board of directors presently remunerates non-executive 
directors at around the average of those obtained from relevant comparable data from similar listed companies and appropriate industry 
sectors. A measure of longer-term incentive is provided by the allocation of options to non-executive directors. The board of directors 
determines remuneration to individual non-executive directors, working within the limit set by shareholders, and taking into account any 
special duties or accountability. Payments to non-executive directors are not linked to Company performance but in order to align their 
interest with those of shareholders, non-executive directors are encouraged to hold shares in Aura Energy Limited.

Executives and non-executive directors have received a superannuation guarantee contribution as required by law, which increased to 
9.5% on 1 July 2014, but do not receive any other retirement benefits. 

All remuneration paid to non-executive directors and executives is valued at the cost to the Company and is expensed. Options over 
ordinary shares granted to directors and employees are valued using the Black-Scholes methodology. Details of directors’ and executives’ 
interests in options as at 30 June 2016 are provided in the Remuneration Report of the financial statements.

Following the last AGM, the Company paid outstanding directors’ fees by way of the issues of fully paid shares on an average VWAP basis. 
The Company proposes to put to shareholders at this year’s AGM a similar mechanism to extinguish outstanding obligations for directors 
fees.

The Chairman became Executive Chairman and Managing Director of the Company with effect on 1 January 2015 and accordingly, is a 
fulltime employee. The Executive Chairman and Managing Director has agreed to settle 20% of his salary by way of fully paid ordinary 
shares in the Company.

REMUNERATION DETAILS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
There were no cash bonuses paid during the year and there are no set performance criteria for achieving cash bonuses.

The following table of benefits and payment details, in respect to the financial year, the components of remuneration for each member of 
the key management personnel of the Group: 

2016

GROUP KEY 
MANAGEMENT 
PERSONNEL

SHORT-TERM BENEFITS

SALARY, 
FEES AND 
LEAVE

PROFIT 
SHARE AND 
BONUSES

NON-
MONETARY

$

$

$

OTHER

$

POST- 
EMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS

SUPER- 
ANNUATION

LONG-TERM 
BENEFITS

EQUITY-SETTLED SHARE-
BASED PAYMENTS

TOTAL

OTHER

EQUITY

OPTIONS

COMPEN-
SATION 
CONSISTING 
OF 
OPTIONS

$

$

$

$

$

%

PD Reeve(1)

321,400

Dr R Beeson(2)

BF Fraser(2)

JC Perkins(2)

SF Zillwood(3)

JM Madden(4)

40,000

43,800

40,000

-

-

445,200

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

53,299

39,149

92,448

28,600

3,800

-

3,800

-

-

36,200

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

100,000

158,645

608,645

26.06%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43,800

43,800

43,800

53,299

39,149

-

-

-

-

-

100,000

158,645

832,493

19.06%

(1)  Mr Reeve was issued 3,725,500 fully paid ordinary shares (net of tax) in the Company pursuant to his contract of employment.

(2)  Emoluments for non-executive directors, Dr R Beeson and Messrs BF Fraser and JC Perkins, include 11 months of accrued entitlements for the financial year 

ended 30 June 2016 pursuant to Letters of Appointment. The non-executive directors agreed to defer emoluments until such time as the Company had secured 
significant long-term finance to advance its projects. The board of directors propose to put to shareholders at the 2016 Annual General Meeting a resolution for 
the non-executive directors to be allotted fully paid ordinary shares in the Company, net of tax, in lieu of cash entitlements to emoluments. The superannuation 
levy will be paid by way of cash settlement to the superannuation fund nominated by each non-executiv4e director. 

(3)  Mr SF Zillwood is employed by Foster Resources Pty Ltd, a company controlled by Mr SF Zillwood, which provided company secretarial and accounting services to 

the Company for the period 1 July 2015 to 31 March 2016 pursuant to a consultancy contract, dated 30 December 2013.

(4)  Mr JM Madden was appointed company secretary and chief financial officer on 31 March 2016 following the decision by Mr SF Zillwood to retire and accordingly, 
terminate his contractual relationship with the Company. Mr Madden is retained as a contractor and his appointment to the position is subject to a month-by-
month arrangement until such time as the Company secures long-term finance to advance its projects. 

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16DirECtors' rEport 21

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONT)

2015

GROUP KEY 
MANAGEMENT 
PERSONNEL

SHORT-TERM BENEFITS

SALARY, 
FEES AND 
LEAVE

PROFIT 
SHARE AND 
BONUSES

NON-
MONETARY

$

$

$

OTHER

$

POST- 
EMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS

SUPER- 
ANNUATION

LONG-TERM 
BENEFITS

EQUITY-SETTLED SHARE-
BASED PAYMENTS

TOTAL

OTHER

EQUITY

OPTIONS

COMPEN-
SATION 
CONSISTING 
OF OPTIONS

$

$

$

$

$

%

PD Reeve (1)(2)(10)

330,167

Dr R Beeson(3)(4)(10)

182,650

BF Fraser(5)(6)(10)

JC Perkins(7)(8)(10)

SF Zillwood(9) 

58,333

53,750

-

624,900

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

102,816

102,816

26,833

17,369

5,542

5,106

-

54,850

-

-

-

-

-

-

50,000

96,704

503,704

19.20%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

200,019

63,875

58,856

102,819

-

-

-

-

50,000

96,704

929,270

10.14% 

(1)  Mr Reeve was issued 4,612,380 fully paid ordinary shares in lieu of director’s emolument.

(2)  Mr Reeve was appointed Executive Chairman and Managing Director on 1 January 2015 and as a result, the remuneration paid to Mr Reeve reflects his 

appointment to his dual role.

(3)  Mr Beeson was issued 2,566,315 fully paid ordinary shares in lieu of director’s emolument.

(4)  Mr Beeson retired as Managing Director of Aura Energy Limited on 31 December 2014. As at balance date, 30 June 2015, Mr Beeson is entitled to accrued annual 
leave and long service amounting to $122,122. At the date of this Remuneration Report the Company is in discussion with Mr Beeson over other matters relating 
to his contract of employment. 

(5)  Mr Fraser was issued 729,290 fully paid ordinary shares in lieu of director’s emolument.

(6)  Wolfstar Group Pty Ltd, a company controlled by Mr Fraser, provided financial services to Aura Energy Limited during the financial year. These services were 

provided indirectly by Mr Fraser and have therefore not been included in remuneration. 

(7)  Mr Perkins was issued 1,936,042 fully paid ordinary shares in lieu of director’s emolument.

(8)  RRI Trust, a company controlled by Mr Perkins, provided metallurgical consulting services to the Aura Energy Limited during the year.

(9)  The Company Secretary and CFO, Stan Zillwood is employed by Foster Resources Pty Ltd, a company controlled by Mr Zillwood, to provide services to the Group 

under a contract dated 30 December 2013.

(10) Amounts disclosed for Equity settled share-based payments exclude share-based payments accrued in 2014 but settled in the 2015 financial year. 

(11) Other transactions with key management personnel are set out on page 25.

SERVICE AGREEMENTS
The Executive Chairman and Managing Director, Peter Reeve, is employed under a contract of employment, effective 1 January 2015. 

The employment deed stipulates a four weeks’ resignation period. The Company may terminate the employment contract without cause 
by providing four weeks’ written notice, or making payment in lieu of notice based on the individual’s annual salary component.

If employment is terminated other than for serious misconduct, and the employee is not then otherwise in default of this contract and his 
employment, the Managing Director will, in connection with his retirement from the office, receive in addition to the required four weeks’ 
notice period, three months’ salary. An additional benefit may be paid in the amount of one month for every year of service. This is subject 
to the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), which may require shareholder approval.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

a. 

Incentive Option Scheme

Options are granted under the Aura Energy Limited Incentive Option Scheme. All staff who have been continuously employed by the 
Company for a period of at least one year are eligible to participate in the plan. Options are granted under the plan for no consideration. 

b.  Director and Key Management Personnel Options

On 9 June 2015, the Company granted the Executive Chairman and Managing Director the following options over ordinary shares:

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.10 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2018.

•  6,250,000 at an exercise price of $0.10 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 February 2019.

•  2,500,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2019.

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2020.

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2021. 

As at the date of this report, all options over ordinary shares previously granted to non-executive directors have expired.

22

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONT)

c.  Share-based Payments

The terms and conditions relating to options granted as remuneration during the year to directors and key management personnel  
are as follows:

2016

GROUP KEY 
MANAGEMENT 
PERSON

GRANT VALUE
$
(NOTE 1)

GRANT DATE

REASON FOR
 GRANT

VESTING DATE

PD Reeve

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

66,436

57,884

19,445

87,364

Note 1

9 Jun 2016

Note 1

9 Feb 2016

Note 1

9 Feb 2016

Note 1

9 Feb 2017

10 Jun 2015

103,555

Note 1

9 Feb 2018

PERCENTAGE 
VESTED 
DURING 
YEAR
%

PERCENTAGE
FORFEITED 
DURING YEAR
%

PERCENTAGE 
REMAINING AS
UNVESTED
%

EXPIRY DATE

RANGE OF 
POSSIBLE 
VALUES
RELATING TO 
FUTURE 
PAYMENTS

100

100

100

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

9 Jun 2018

- 9 Feb 2019

- 9 Feb 2019

100

9 Feb 2020

100

9 Feb 2021

-

-

-

-

-

Note 1. The options have been granted to the Executive Chairman and Managing Director as part of his remuneration and for future 
performance. The vesting conditions of the options are as follows:

•  Tranche 1: vest at immediately, exercisable at 10 cents, expire 9 June 2018.

•  Tranche 2: vest at 8 months from issue, exercisable at 10 cents, expire 9 February 2019.

•  Tranche 3 vest at 8 months from issue, exercisable at 15 cents, expire 9 February 2019.

•  Tranche 4: vest at 20 months from issue, exercisable at 15 cents, expire 9 February 2020.

•  Tranche 5 vest at 32 months from issue, exercisable at 15 cents, expire 9 February 2021.

Details of all Share-Based Payments in existence during the year can be found at Note 19 Share-Based Payments.

2015

GROUP KEY 
MANAGEMENT 
PERSON

GRANT VALUE
$
(NOTE 1)

GRANT DATE

REASON FOR
 GRANT

VESTING DATE

PERCENTAGE 
VESTED 
DURING 
YEAR
%

PERCENTAGE
FORFEITED 
DURING YEAR
%

PERCENTAGE 
REMAINING AS
UNVESTED
%

EXPIRY DATE

RANGE OF 
POSSIBLE 
VALUES
RELATING TO 
FUTURE 
PAYMENTS

PD Reeve

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

66,436

57,884

19,445

87,364

Note 1

9 Feb 2016

Note 1

9 Feb 2016

Note 1

9 Feb 2017

Note 1

9 Jun 2016

100

10 Jun 2015

103,555

Note 1

9 Feb 2018

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

9 Jun 2018

100

9 Feb 2019

100

9 Feb 2019

100

9 Feb 2020

100

9 Feb 2021

-

-

-

-

-

Note 1. The options have been granted to the Executive Chairman and Managing Director as part of his remuneration and for future 
performance. The vesting conditions of the options are as follows:

•  Tranche 1: vest at immediately, exercisable at 10 cents, expire 9 June 2018.

•  Tranche 2: vest at 8 months from issue, exercisable at 10 cents, expire 9 February 2019.

•  Tranche 3 vest at 8 months from issue, exercisable at 15 cents, expire 9 February 2019.

•  Tranche 4: vest at 20 months from issue, exercisable at 15 cents, expire 9 February 2020.

•  Tranche 5 vest at 32 months from issue, exercisable at 15 cents, expire 9 February 2021.

Details of all Share-Based Payments in existence during the year can be found at Note 19 Share-Based Payments.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16DirECtors' rEport 23

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONT)

d.  Description of Options Issued as Remuneration

Details of the options over ordinary shares granted as remuneration to those KMP listed in the previous tables are as follows:

GRANT DATE

ISSUER

ENTITLEMENT ON 
EXERCISE

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

DATES EXERCISABLE

From vesting date to

9 Jun 2018 (expiry)

9 Feb 2019 (expiry)

10 Jun 2015

Aura Energy Ltd

1:1 ordinary shares

9 Feb 2019 (expiry)

10 Jun 2015

10 Jun 2015

9 Feb 2020 (expiry)

9 Feb 2021 (expiry)

EXERCISE PRICE 
$

VALUE PER OPTION 
AT GRANT DATE 
$

AMOUNT PAID/ 
PAYABLE BY 
RECIPIENT 
$

0.10

0.10

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.0076

0.0093

0.0078

0.0100

0.0118

-

-

-

-

-

-

Options over ordinary shares values at grant date were determined using the Black-Scholes method.

Details relating to service and performance criteria required for the vesting of options over ordinary shares have been provided in the 
within the financial statements at Note 19. Share-based payments.

KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (KMP) EQUITY HOLDINGS

a.  Fully paid ordinary shares of Aura Energy Limited held by each KMP

2016

GROUP KEY MANAGEMENT PERSON

BALANCE AT
START OF YEAR
NO.

RECEIVED DURING
THE YEAR AS
COMPENSATION
NO.

RECEIVED DURING
THE YEAR ON THE
EXERCISE OF OPTIONS
NO.

OTHER CHANGES
 DURING THE YEAR (1)
NO.

BALANCE AT 
END OF YEAR
NO.

PD Reeve

RF Beeson

BF Fraser

JC Perkins

SF Zillwood

JM Madden

5,442,804

5,636,937

3,957,600

2,861,990

-

-

3,725,500

-

-

-

-

-

17,899,331

3,725,500

(1)  During the financial year Mr PD Reeve purchased ordinary shares in the Company on the market.

2015

GROUP KEY MANAGEMENT PERSON

BALANCE AT
START OF YEAR
NO.

RECEIVED DURING
THE YEAR AS
COMPENSATION
NO.

RECEIVED DURING
THE YEAR ON THE
EXERCISE OF OPTIONS
NO.

PD Reeve

Dr R Beeson

BF Fraser

JC Perkins

SF Zillwood

664,830

2,730,216

2,676,310

740,758

-

4,611,766

2,566,315

729,290

1,936,042

-

6,812,114

9,843,413

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

550,000

-

-

-

-

-

9,718,304

5,636,937

3,957,600

2,861,990

-

-

550,000

22,174,831

OTHER CHANGES
 DURING THE YEAR(1)
NO.

BALANCE AT 
END OF YEAR
NO.

166,208

340,406

552,000

185,190

-

5,442,804

5,636,937

3,957,600

2,861,990

-

1,243,804

17,899,331

(1)  Other changes during the year relate the participation of directors in equity raising initiatives as well as on-market purchases.

24

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONT)

b.  Options of Aura Energy Limited held by each KMP

2016

GROUP KEY MANAGEMENT 
PERSON

BALANCE AT
START OF YEAR
NO.

GRANTED AS
REMUNERATION
DURING THE YEAR
NO.

EXERCISED
DURING THE YEAR
NO.

OTHER CHANGES
DURING THE YEAR
NO.

BALANCE AT
END OF YEAR
NO.

VESTED AND
EXERCISABLE
NO.

PD Reeve(1)

Dr R Beeson(2)

BF Fraser(3)

JC Perkins(4)

SF Zillwood

JM Madden

2015

39,333,104

2,295,205

901,000

1,392,595

-

-

43,921,904

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

GROUP KEY MANAGEMENT 
PERSON

BALANCE AT
START OF YEAR
NO.

PD Reeve(1)

Dr R Beeson(2)

BF Fraser(3)

JC Perkins(4)

SF Zillwood

6,250,000

6,520,710

2,326,579

2,556,667

-

GRANTED AS
REMUNERATION
DURING THE YEAR
NO.

35,000,000

EXERCISED
DURING THE YEAR
NO.

-

-

-

-

17,653,956

35,000,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(2,333,104)

37,000,000

19,500,000

(170,205)

(276,000)

(142,595)

-

-

2,125,000

625,000

1,250,000

-

-

2,125,000

625,000

1,250,000

-

-

(2,921,904)

41,000,000

23,500,000

OTHER CHANGES
DURING THE YEAR
NO.

BALANCE AT
END OF YEAR
NO.

VESTED AND
EXERCISABLE
NO.

(1,916,896)

39,333,104

13,000,000

(4,225,505)

(1,425,579)

(1,164,072)

-

2,295,205

901,000

1,392,595

-

2,295,205

901,000

1,392,595

-

(8,732,052)

43,921,904

17,588,800

(1)  Mr Reeve was issued 83,104 options over ordinary shares pursuant to the non-renounceable rights issue on 5 September 2014 and 2,000,000 options over 

ordinary shares previously granted to Mr Reeve expired during the financial year.

(2)   Mr Beeson was issued 274,495 options over ordinary shares pursuant to the non-renounceable rights issue on 5 September 2014 and 4,500,000 options over 

ordinary shares previously granted to Mr Beeson expired during the financial year.

(3)   Mr Fraser was issued 74,421 options over ordinary shares pursuant to the non-renounceable rights issue on 5 September 2014 and 1,500,000 options over 

ordinary shares previously granted to Mr Fraser expired during the financial year.

(4)   Mr Perkins was issued 85,928 options over ordinary shares pursuant to the non-renounceable rights issue on 5 September 2014 and 1,250,000 options over 

ordinary shares previously granted to Mr Perkins expired during the financial year.

LOANS TO KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
There are no loans made to directors of Aura Energy as at 30 June 2016 (2015: nil).

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONT)

OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Wolfstar Group Pty Ltd

Financial services provided by Wolfstar Group

Drake Resources Limited

Amounts due to Drake Resources for other services.

Amounts due from Drake Resources for other services provided by  
Aura Energy Limited staff

RRI Trust

Mr Perkins provides metallurgical consulting services to the Group that is charged through 
the RRI Trust, being a trust associated with Mr Perkins

Amounts owing to KMP

Payable for unpaid fees

PD Reeve 

Dr R Beeson

BF Fraser

JC Perkins

SF Zillwod

JM Madden

DirECtors' rEport 25

2016 
$

-

-

-

-

-

40,150

40,150

40,150

-

18,840

2015 
$

24,503

2,576

53,590

9,628

-

-

-

-

28,527

-

There have been no other transactions involving equity instruments other than those described in this Annual Report.

This Report of the Directors, incorporating the Remuneration Report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of directors made pursuant 
to s.298(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

P D Reeve

Executive Chairman and Managing Director

Dated this Thursday, 29 September 2016

26

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE 
DECLARATION 

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 27

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

For tHE YEAr ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

28

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS  
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Continuing operations

Revenue 

Other income

Project partnering and divestment

Accounting and audit fees

Business development

Computers and communications

Depreciation

Employee benefits

Finance Costs

Impairment of exploration expenditure previously capitalised

Insurance

Consulting fees and corporate advisory

Public relations

Rent and utilities

Share-based payments

Share registry and listing fees

Travel and accommodation

Write-off of exploration assets

AIM listing costs 

Other expenses 

Loss before income tax

Income tax benefit

Loss from continuing operations

Other comprehensive income, net of income tax

Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:

Foreign currency movement

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

NOTE

2

2

4

10

19

3

5

2016 
$

4,907

- 

4,907

-

2015 
$

19,159

3,064

22,223

(3,757)

(149,416)

(126,869)

-

(44,193)

(1,602)

(711,929)

(8,171)

(6,000)

(27,150)

(4,676)

(638,556)

(60,564)

-

(1,045,240)

(51,378)

(223,149)

(22,472)

(39,847)

(158,645)

(79,385)

(49,273)

(51,461)

(165,840)

(22,529)

(39,451)

(182,309)

(67,526)

(33,168)

(96,704)

(63,522)

(92,836)

(12,026)

-

(15,769)

(1,774,383)

(2,493,900)

148,608

-

(1,625,775)

(2,493,900)

31,563

31,563

13,327 

13,327 

Total comprehensive income attributable to members of the parent entity

(1,594,212)

(2,480,573)

Earnings per share:

Basic loss per share (cents per share)

¢

¢

6

(0.41)

(0.93)

The consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 
AS AT 30 JUNE 2016

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets

Total current assets

Non-current assets

Plant and equipment

Exploration and evaluation assets

Total non-current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Short-term provisions

Borrowings

Total current liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Issued capital

Reserves

Accumulated losses

Total Equity

The consolidated statement of financial position is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 29

NOTE

2016 
 $

2015 
$

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

317,758

57,708

43,625

419,091

943,011

96,282

44,157

1,083,450

-

1,602

14,137,710

14,137,710

13,259,797

13,261,399

14,556,801

14,344,849

550,844

165,251

-

716,095

716,095

401,345

138,639

43,040

583,024

583,024

13,840,706

13,761,825

32,784,203

31,311,988

1,029,542

901,252

(19,973,039)

(18,451,415)

13,840,706

13,761,825

30

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Balance at 1 July 2014

27,935,558

(16,474,803)

749,118

489,001

12,698,874

ISSUED
CAPITAL
$

ACCUMULATED
LOSSES
$

OPTIONS
RESERVE
$

FOREIGN
EXCHANGE
TRANSLATION
RESERVE
$

TOTAL
$

Balance at 1 July 2015

31,311,988

(18,451,415)

398,924

502,328

13,761,825

Loss for the year attributable owners of the parent

Other comprehensive income for the year attributable 
owners of the parent

Total comprehensive income for the year attributable 
owners of the parent

Transaction with owners, directly in equity 

Shares issued during the year 

Transaction costs

Options expired during the year

Options exercised during the year

Options issued during the year

Balance at 30 June 2015

-

-

-

(2,493,900)

-

(2,493,900)

3,691,230

(314,800)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

517,288

(517,288)

-

-

-

31,311,988

(18,451,415)

Loss for the year attributable owners of the parent

Other comprehensive income for the year attributable 
owners of the parent

Total comprehensive income for the year attributable 
owners of the parent

Transaction with owners, directly in equity 

-

-

-

(1,625,775)

-

(1,625,775)

Shares issued during the year 

Transaction costs

Options expired during the year

Options exercised during the year

Options issued during the year

Balance at 30 June 2016

1,579,816

(107,601)

-

-

104,151

(104,151)

-

200,878

495,651

32,784,203

(19,973,039)

The consolidated statement of changes in equity is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes

-

167,094

398,924

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(2,493,900)

13,327

13,327

13,327

(2,480,573)

-

-

-

-

-

3,691,230

(314,800)

-

-

167,094

502,328

13,761,825

-

(1,625,775)

31,563

31,563

31,563

(1,594,212)

-

-

-

-

-

1,579,816

(107,601)

-

-

200,878

533,891

13,840,706

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Cash flows from operating activities

Receipts from customers

Interest received

Payments to suppliers and employees

Payments for exploration expenditure

Rebate received for Research and Development

Net cash used in operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Purchase of plant and equipment

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from issue of shares 

Capital raising costs

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net increase/(decrease) in cash held

Cash at 1 July

Change in foreign currency held

Cash at 30 June

The statement of cash flows is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 31

NOTE

2016 
 $

4,907

2015 
 $

- 

19,159 

(892,505)

(1,074,840)

(1,190,561)

(1,438,205)

148,608

- 

18a

(1,929,551)

(2,493,886)

-

-

(3,285)

(3,285)

1,365,639

(59,324)

1,306,315

(623,236)

943,011

(2,017)

317,758

3,065,806 

 (186,723)

2,879,083

381,912

570,478

(9,379)

943,011

7

32

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Since the end of the financial year, the Company has 
completed its AIM listing as well as an Australian 
Placement and has raised A$5,002,677 in new equity 
(before costs).  

The directors have prepared a cash flow forecast, which 
indicates that the Group will have sufficient cash flows to 
meet all commitments and working capital requirements 
for the 12 month period from the date of signing this 
financial report.

iv.  Use of estimates and judgements

The preparation of financial statements requires 
management to make judgements, estimates and 
assumptions that affect the application of policies and 
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and 
expenses. These estimates and associated assumptions are 
based on historical experience and various factors that are 
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the 
results of which form the basis of making the judgements 
about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not 
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may 
differ from these estimates. 

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on 
an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are 
recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised 
and in any future periods affected.

Judgements made by management in the application of 
Australian Accounting Standards that have significant 
effect on the financial statements and estimates with a 
significant risk of material adjustment in the next year 
are discussed in Note 1r Critical accounting estimates and 
judgments.

v.  Comparative figures

Where required by Accounting Standards comparative 
figures have been adjusted to conform with changes in 
presentation for the current financial year.

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES
These are the consolidated financial statements and notes of 
Aura Energy Limited and controlled entities (“Consolidated Group” 
or “Group”). Aura Energy Limited is a company limited by shares, 
domiciled and incorporated in Australia.

The separate financial statements of the parent entity, Aura Energy 
Limited, have not been presented with this financial report as 
permitted by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

a.  Basis of preparation

i.  Statement of compliance

The financial statements are general purpose financial 
statements that have been prepared in accordance 
with Australian Accounting Standards, including 
Australian Accounting Interpretations, other authoritative 
pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards 
Board and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). 

Australian Accounting Standards set out accounting 
policies that the AASB has concluded would result 
in a financial report containing relevant and reliable 
information about transactions, events and conditions to 
which they apply. Compliance with Australian Accounting 
Standards ensures that the financial statements and 
notes also comply with International Financial Reporting 
Standards as issued by the IASB. Material accounting 
policies adopted in the preparation of these financial 
statements are presented below. They have been 
consistently applied unless otherwise stated. 

The financial statements were authorised for issue on 30 
September 2016 by the directors of the Company.

ii.  Financial position

The financial statements have been prepared on an 
accruals basis and are based on historical costs modified, 
where applicable, by the measurement at fair value of 
selected non-current assets, financial assets and financial 
liabilities. 

iii.  Going concern

The financial statements have been prepared on a going 
concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal 
business activity and the realisation of assets and the 
settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

The Group incurred a loss for the year of $1,625,775 
(2015: $2,493,900 and a net cash out-flow from operating 
activities of $1,929,551 (2015: $2,493,886)

As at 30 June 2016, the Group had working capital 
deficit of $297,004 (2015: $500,426 working capital). The 
Company has no debt component in its working capital 
following the conversion by Australian Special Opportunity 
Fund of its convertible notes into fully paid ordinary shares 
(2015: $43,040 in convertible notes outstanding).

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 33

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

b.  Principles of consolidation

A controlled entity is any entity over which Aura Energy 
Limited has the power to govern the financial and 
operating policies so as to obtain benefits from its 
activities. In assessing the power to govern, the existence 
and effect of holdings of actual and potential voting rights 
are considered. A list of controlled entities is contained in 
Note 17 Controlled entities in the financial statements.

All inter-group balances and transactions between entities 
in the Consolidated Group, including any unrealised 
profits or losses, have been eliminated on consolidation. 
Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed 
where necessary to ensure consistency with those adopted 
by the parent entity.

As at reporting date, the assets and liabilities of all 
controlled entities have been incorporated into the 
consolidated financial statements as well as their results 
for the year then ended. Where controlled entities have 
entered (left) the Consolidated Group during the year, their 
operating results have been included (excluded) from the 
date control was obtained (ceased).

i.  Business combinations

Business combinations occur when an acquirer obtains 
control over one or more businesses.

A business combination is accounted for by applying the 
acquisition method, unless it is a combination involving 
entities or businesses under common control. The 
business combination will be accounted for from the 
date that control is attained, whereby the fair value of 
the identifiable assets acquire and liabilities (including 
contingent liabilities) assumed is recognised (subject to 
certain limited exemptions).

When measuring the consideration transferred in the 
business combination, any asset or liability resulting from 
a contingent consideration arrangement is also included. 
Subsequent to initial recognition, contingent consideration 
classified as an asset or liability is remeasured each 
reporting period to fair value, recognising any change to 
fair value in profit or loss, unless the change in value can 
be identified as existing at acquisition date.

All transaction costs incurred in relation to the business 
combination are expensed to the statement of profit or 
loss and comprehensive income.

The acquisition of a business may result in the recognition 
of goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase.

c.  Exploration and development expenditure

i.  Recognition and measurement

Exploration, evaluation, and development expenditure 
incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable 
area of interest. These costs are only carried forward to 
the extent that they are expected to be recouped through 
the successful development of the area or where activities 
in the area have not yet reached a stage that permits 
reasonable assessment of the existence of economically 
recoverable reserves.

ii.  Subsequent measurement

Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are 
written off in full against profit in the year in which the 
decision to abandon the area is made.

When production commences, the accumulated costs for 
the relevant area of interest will be amortised over the 
life of the area according to the rate of depletion of the 
economically recoverable reserves.

A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to 
determine the appropriateness of continuing to capitalise 
costs in relation to that area of interest.

iii.  Site restoration and rehabilitation

Costs of site restoration will be provided over the life of 
the project, when such costs are incurred or the Group 
becomes liable pursuant to a development agreement with 
government agencies. In the exploration and evaluation 
phase, all drill holes are collared and any site disturbance 
is restored with the costs incorporated in the costs of 
exploration and evaluation. Site restoration costs will 
include the dismantling and removal of mining plant, 
equipment and building structures, waste removal, and 
rehabilitation of the site in accordance with clauses of the 
mining permits. Such costs have been determined using 
estimates of future costs, current legal requirements and 
technology on an undiscounted basis.

Any changes in the estimates for the costs are accounted 
on a prospective basis. In determining the costs of site 
restoration, there is uncertainty regarding the nature and 
extent of the restoration due to community expectations 
and future legislation. Accordingly the costs have been 
determined on the basis that the restoration will be 
completed within one year of abandoning the site.

d.  Income tax

Current income tax expense charged to the profit or loss 
is the tax payable on taxable income calculated using 
applicable income tax rates enacted, or substantially 
enacted, as at reporting date. Current tax liabilities (assets) 
are therefore measured at the amounts expected to be 
paid to (recovered from) the relevant taxation authority.

Deferred income tax expense reflects movements in 
deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability balances 
during the year as well as unused tax losses.

Current and deferred income tax expense (income) is 
charged or credited outside profit or loss when the tax 
relates to items recognised outside profit or loss.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are ascertained based 
on temporary differences arising between the tax bases 
of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in 
the financial statements. Deferred tax assets also result 
where amounts have been fully expensed but future tax 
deductions are available. No deferred income tax will 
be recognised from the initial recognition of an asset or 
liability, excluding a business combination, where there is 
no effect on accounting or taxable profit or loss.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated at the tax 
rates that are expected to apply to the period when the 
asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates 
enacted or substantively enacted at reporting date. 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)34

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

Their measurement also reflects the manner in which 
management expects to recover or settle the carrying 
amount of the related asset or liability.

Deferred tax assets relating to temporary differences and 
unused tax losses are recognised only to the extent that 
it is probable that future taxable profit will be available 
against which the benefits of the deferred tax asset can be 
utilised.

Where temporary differences exist in relation to 
investments in subsidiaries, branches, associates, and 
joint ventures, deferred tax assets and liabilities are 
not recognised where the timing of the reversal of the 
temporary difference can be controlled and it is not 
probable that the reversal will occur in the foreseeable 
future.

Current tax assets and liabilities are offset where a legally 
enforceable right of set-off exists and it is intended that 
net settlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement 
of the respective asset and liability will occur. Deferred tax 
assets and liabilities are offset where a legally enforceable 
right of set-off exists, the deferred tax assets and liabilities 
relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation 
authority on either the same taxable entity or different 
taxable entities where it is intended that net settlement or 
simultaneous realisation and settlement of the respective 
asset and liability will occur in future periods in which 
significant amounts of deferred tax assets or liabilities are 
expected to be recovered or settled.

Where the Group receives the Australian Government’s 
Research and Development Tax Incentive, The Group 
accounts for the refundable tax offset under AASB 112. 
Funds are received as a rebate through the parent 
company’s income tax return and disclosed as such in Note 
5 Income tax.

e.  Plant and equipment

i.  Recognition and measurement

Each class of plant and equipment is measured at cost 
or fair value less, where applicable, any accumulated 
depreciation and impairment losses.

The carrying amount of plant and equipment is reviewed 
annually by directors to ensure it is not in excess of the 
recoverable amount from these assets. The recoverable 
amount is assessed on the basis of the expected net cash 
flows that will be received from the assets employment 
and subsequent disposal. The expected net cash flows 
have not been discounted to their present values in 
determining recoverable amounts. 

Items of property, plant and equipment are measured 
at cost less accumulated depreciation (see below) and 
impairment losses (see Note 1m Impairment of non-
financial assets and 1c Exploration and development 
expenditure).

ii.  Depreciation

The depreciable amount of all fixed assets including 
building and capitalised lease assets, but excluding 
freehold land, is depreciated on a straight line basis over 
their useful lives to the Consolidated Group commencing 
from the time the asset is held ready for use. Leasehold 
improvements are depreciated over the shorter of either 
the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful 
lives of the improvements.

The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable 
assets are: 

Plant and equipment 

Computers 

Motor Vehicles 

20.00%

33.00%

25.00%

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, 
and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting 
period. An asset’s carrying amount is written down 
immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s 
carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable 
amount.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by 
comparing proceeds with the carrying amount. These gains 
and losses are included in the statement of comprehensive 
income. When re-valued assets are sold, amounts included 
in the revaluation reserve relating to that asset are 
transferred to retained earnings.

f.  Employee benefits

For the period ending 30 June 2016 the Company has 
three employees.

i.  Defined contribution superannuation funds

A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit 
plan under which an entity pays fixed contributions onto 
a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive 
obligation to pay further amounts. Obligations for 
contributions to defined contribution superannuation 
funds are recognised as an expense in the income 
statement as incurred. Prepaid contributions are 
recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a 
reduction in future payments is available.

ii.  Short-term benefits

Liabilities for employee benefits for wages, salaries and 
annual leave that are expected to be settled within 
12 months of the reporting date represent present 
obligations resulting from employees’ services provided 
to the reporting date and are calculated at undiscounted 
amounts based on remuneration wage and salary rates 
that the Company expects to pay at the reporting date 
including related on-costs, such as workers compensation 
insurance and payroll tax.

Non-accumulating non-monetary benefits, such as medical 
care, housing, cars and free or subsidised goods and 
services, are expensed based on the net marginal cost to 
the Company as the benefits are taken by the employees.

iii.  Other long-term benefits

Employee benefits payable later than one year have been 
measured at the present value of the estimated future 
cash outflows to be made for those benefits.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 35

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

g.  Equity-settled compensation

The Group operates an employee share ownership scheme. 
Share-based payments to employees are measured at the 
fair value of the instruments issued and amortised over the 
vesting periods. Share-based payments to non-employees 
are measured at the fair value of goods or services 
received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, 
if it is determined the fair value of the goods or services 
cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date 
the goods or services are received. The corresponding 
amount is recorded to the option reserve. The fair value 
of options is determined using the Black-Scholes pricing 
model. The number of shares and options expected to 
vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of each reporting 
period such that the amount recognised for services 
received as consideration for the equity instruments 
granted is based on the number of equity instruments that 
eventually vest.

h.  Revenue and other income

Interest revenue is recognised on a proportional basis 
taking into account the interest rates applicable to the 
financial assets.

Management fees are recognised on portion of completion 
basis. 

Gain on disposal of tenements, and revenue from 
equipment chargebacks, are recognised on receipt of 
compensation.

All revenue is stated net of the amount of value added 
taxes (see Note 1i Value-added taxes).

i.  Value-added taxes

Value-added taxes (VAT) is the generic term for the 
broad-based consumption taxes that the Group is exposed 
to such as: Australia (GST); Sweden (MOMS); and in 
Mauritanian (VAT).

Revenues, expenses, and assets are recognised net of the 
amount of VAT, except where the amount of VAT incurred 
is not recoverable from the relevant country’s taxation 
authority. In these circumstances the VAT is recognised 
as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of 
an item of the expense. Receivables and payables in the 
statement of financial position are shown inclusive of VAT.

Cash flows are presented in the statement of cash flows on 
a gross basis, except for the VAT component of investing 
and financing activities, which are disclosed as operating 
cash flows.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the 
amount of VAT recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation 
authority.

j.  Leases

Leases of fixed assets where substantially all the risks 
and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset, but 
not the legal ownership, are transferred to entities in the 
Group are classified as finance leases.

Leased assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis 
over their estimated useful lives where it is likely that the 
Group will obtain ownership of the asset or over the term 
of the lease.

Lease payments for operating leases, where substantially 
all the risks and benefits remain with the lessor, are 
charged as expenses in the periods in which they are 
incurred.

Lease incentives under operating leases are recognised as 
a liability and amortised on a straight-line basis over the 
life of the lease term.

k.  Financial instruments

i. 

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial instruments, incorporating financial assets 
and financial liabilities, are recognised when the entity 
becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the 
instrument. Trade date accounting is adopted for financial 
assets that are delivered within timeframes established by 
marketplace convention.

Financial instruments are initially measured at fair value 
plus transactions costs where the instrument is not 
classified as at fair value through profit or loss. Transaction 
costs related to instruments classified as at fair value 
through profit or loss are expensed to profit or loss 
immediately. 

The Group does not designate any interests in subsidiaries, 
associates or joint venture entities as being subject to 
the requirements of accounting standards specifically 
applicable to financial instruments.

ii.  Non-derivative financial instruments

Non-derivative financial instruments comprise investments 
in equity securities, trade and other receivables, cash and 
cash equivalents and trade and other payables.

Non-derivative financial instruments are recognised 
initially at fair value plus, for instruments not at fair value 
through profit or loss, any directly attributable transactions 
costs. Subsequent to initial recognition non-derivative 
financial instruments are measured as described below.

iii.  Classification and subsequent measurement

(1)  Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits 
held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid 
investments with original maturities of three months or 
less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within 
short-borrowings in current liabilities on the Statement of 
financial position.

(2)  Loans
Loans are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or 
determinable payments that are not quoted in an active 
market and are subsequently measured at amortised cost. 
Gains or losses are recognised in profit or loss through 
the amortisation process and when the financial asset is 
derecognised.

Loans are included in current assets, except for those 
which are not expected to mature within 12 months after 
the end of the reporting period.

(3)  Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables are stated at amortised cost. 
Receivables are usually settled within 30 to 90 days.

Collectability of trade and other debtors is reviewed on 
an ongoing basis. An impairment loss is recognised for 
debts which are known to be uncollectible. An impairment 
provision is raised for any doubtful amounts.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)36

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

(4)  Trade and other payables
Trade payables and other payable are recognised when 
the Group becomes obligated to make future payments 
resulting from the purchase of goods and services which 
are unpaid and stated at their amortised cost. The amounts 
are unsecured and are generally settled on 30 day terms.

(5)  Financial liabilities
Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial 
guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortised cost.

(6)  Share capital
Ordinary issued capital is recorded at the consideration 
received. Incremental costs directly attributable to the 
issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognised 
as a deduction from equity, net of any related income tax 
benefit. Ordinary issued capital bears no special terms or 
conditions affecting income or capital entitlements of the 
shareholders.

iv.  Amortised cost

Amortised cost is calculated as the amount at which 
the financial asset or financial liability is measured at 
initial recognition less principal repayments and any 
reduction for impairment, and adjusted for any cumulative 
amortisation of the difference between that initial amount 
and the maturity amount calculated using the effective 
interest method.

v.  Fair value

Fair value is determined based on current bid prices for 
all quoted investments. Valuation techniques are applied 
to determine the fair value for all unlisted securities, 
including recent arm’s length transactions, reference to 
similar instruments and option pricing models.

vi.  Effective interest method

The effective interest method is used to allocate interest 
income or interest expense over the relevant period and 
is equivalent to the rate that discounts estimated future 
cash payments or receipts (including fees, transaction costs 
and other premiums or discounts) over the expected life 
(or when this cannot be reliably predicted, the contractual 
term) of the financial instrument to the net carrying 
amount of the financial asset or financial liability. Revisions 
to expected future net cash flows will necessitate an 
adjustment to the carrying amount with a consequential 
recognition of an income or expense item in profit or loss.

vii.  Impairment

A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to 
determine whether there is any objective evidence that it 
is impaired. A financial asset is considered to be impaired if 
objective evidence indicates that one or more events have 
had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of 
that asset.

An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset 
measured at amortised cost is calculated as the difference 
between its carrying amount, and the present value of the 
estimated future cash flows discounted at the original 
effective interest rate.

Individually significant financial assets are tested for 
impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial 
assets are assessed collectively in Groups that share 
similar credit risk characteristics.

All impairment losses are recognised in the income 
statement. 

An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be 
related objectively to an event occurring after the 
impairment loss was recognised. For financial assets 
measured at amortised cost the reversal is recognised in 
the income statement. 

viii. Derecognition

Financial assets are derecognised where the contractual 
rights to cash flow expires or the asset is transferred 
to another party whereby the entity no longer has any 
significant continuing involvement in the risks and 
benefits associated with the asset. Financial liabilities are 
derecognised where the related obligations are either 
discharged, cancelled or expired. The difference between 
the carrying value of the financial liability extinguished 
or transferred to another party and the fair value of 
consideration paid, including the transfer of non-cash 
assets or liabilities assumed, is recognised in profit or loss.

ix.  Financial income and expenses

Finance income comprises interest income on funds 
invested (including available-for-sale financial assets), 
gains on the disposal of available-for-sale financial assets 
and changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair 
value through profit or loss. Interest income is recognised 
as it accrues in profit or loss, using the effective interest 
method. 

Financial expenses comprise interest expense on 
borrowings calculated using the effective interest method, 
unwinding of discounts on provisions, changes in the fair 
value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 
and impairment losses recognised on financial assets. All 
borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss using the 
effective interest method.

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, 
construction or production of assets that necessarily take 
a substantial period of time to prepare for their intended 
use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets, until such 
time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended 
use or sale. All other borrowing costs are recognised in 
income in the period in which they are incurred.

Foreign currency gains and losses are reported on a net 
basis.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 37

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

l.  Earnings per share

i.  Basic earnings per share

Basic earnings (or loss) per share is determined by dividing 
the profit or loss attributable to equity holders of the 
parent company, excluding any costs of service equity other 
than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number 
of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, 
adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued 
during the year.

ii.  Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings (or loss) per share is determined by 
adjusting the profit or loss attributable to ordinary 
shareholders and the weighted average number of 
ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive 
potential ordinary shares which comprise share options 
granted as share-based payments. 

The Group does not report diluted earnings per share, as 
dilution is not applied to annual losses generated by the 
Group.

Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed 
at each reporting date for any indications that the loss 
has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is 
reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used 
to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss 
is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying 
amount does not exceed the carrying amount that 
would have been determined, net of depreciation and 
amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

n.  Provisions

Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal or 
constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which 
it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will 
results and that outflow can be reliably measured.

o.  Foreign currency transactions and balances

i.  Functional and presentation currency

The functional currency of each of the Group’s entities 
is measured using the currency of the primary economic 
environment in which that entity operates. The 
consolidated financial statements are presented in 
Australian dollars which is the parent entity’s functional 
and presentation currency.

m.  Impairment of non-financial assets

ii.  Transaction and balances

The carrying amounts of the Company’s non-financial 
assets, other than deferred tax assets (Note 1d Income 
tax) and exploration and evaluation assets (Note 1c 
Exploration and development expenditure) are reviewed 
at each reporting date to determine whether there is any 
indication of impairment. If any such indication exists then 
the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount 
of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its 
recoverable amount. A cash-generating unit is the smallest 
identifiable asset Group that generates cash flows that 
largely are independent from other assets and Groups. 
Impairment losses are recognised in the income statement, 
unless the asset has previously been revalued, in which 
case the impairment loss is recognised as a reversal to 
the extent of that previous revaluation with any excess 
recognised through the income statement. Impairment 
losses recognised in respect of cash-generating units 
are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any 
goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the 
carrying amount of the other assets in the unit on a pro 
rata basis.

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating 
unit is the greater of its fair value less costs to sell and 
value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated 
future cash flows are discounted to their present value 
using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market 
assessments of the time value of money and the risks 
specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate 
largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount 
is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the 
asset belongs.

Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional 
currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date 
of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are 
translated at the year-end exchange rate. Non-monetary 
items measured at historical cost continue to be carried 
at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. 
Non-monetary items measured at fair value are reported 
at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were 
determined.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of 
monetary items are recognised in the profit or loss except 
where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net 
investment hedge.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of 
non-monetary items are recognised directly in other 
comprehensive income to the extent that the gain or loss 
is directly recognised in other comprehensive income, 
otherwise the exchange difference is recognised in the 
profit or loss.

iii.  Group companies

The financial results and position of foreign operations 
whose functional currency is different from the Group’s 
presentation currency are translated as follows:

Assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange 
rates prevailing at that reporting date.

Income and expenses are translated at average exchange 
rates for the period.

Retained earnings are translated at the exchange rates 
prevailing at the date of the transaction.

Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign 
operations are transferred directly to the Group’s foreign 
currency translation reserve in the statement of financial 
position. These differences are recognised in the profit or 
loss in the period in which the operation is disposed.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)38

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

p.  Fair value estimation

A number of the Group’s accounting policies and 
disclosures require the determination of fair value, for 
both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. 
Information about the assumptions made in determining 
fair values of assets and liabilities is disclosed in the notes 
specific to that asset or liability.

q.  Fair value of assets and liabilities

The Group measures some of its assets and liabilities 
at fair value on either a recurring or non-recurring 
basis, depending on the requirements of the applicable 
Accounting Standard.

Fair value is the price the Group would receive to sell 
an asset or would have to pay to transfer a liability in an 
orderly  
(i.e. unforced) transaction between independent, 
knowledgeable and willing market participants at the 
measurement date.

As fair value is a market-based measure, the closest 
equivalent observable market pricing information is used 
to determine fair value. Adjustments to market values may 
be made having regard to the characteristics of the specific 
asset or liability. The fair values of assets and liabilities 
that are not traded in an active market are determined 
using one or more valuation techniques. These valuation 
techniques maximise, to the extent possible, the use of 
observable market data.

To the extent possible, market information is extracted 
from either the principal market for the asset or liability 
(i.e. the market with the greatest volume and level of 
activity for the asset or liability) or, in the absence of such 
a market, the most advantageous market available to the 
entity at the end of the reporting period (i.e. the market 
that maximises the receipts from the sale of the asset or 
minimises the payments made to transfer the liability, after 
taking into account transaction costs and transport costs).

For non-financial assets, the fair value measurement also 
takes into account a market participant’s ability to use the 
asset in its highest and best use or to sell it to another 
market participant that would use the asset in its highest 
and best use.

The fair value of liabilities and the entity’s own equity 
instruments (excluding those related to share-based 
payment arrangements) may be valued, where there is no 
observable market price in relation to the transfer of such 
financial instruments, by reference to observable market 
information where such instruments are held as assets. 
Where this information is not available, other valuation 
techniques are adopted and, where significant, are detailed 
in the respective note to the financial statements.

i.  Valuation techniques

In the absence of an active market for an identical asset or 
liability, the Group selects and uses one or more valuation 
techniques to measure the fair value of the asset or 

liability, the Group selects a valuation technique that is 
appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient 
data is available to measure fair value. The availability 
of sufficient and relevant data primarily depends on 
the specific characteristics of the asset or liability being 
measured. The valuation techniques selected by the Group 
are consistent with one or more of the following valuation 
approaches:

(1)  Market approach: valuation techniques that use prices 
and other relevant information generated by market 
transactions for identical or similar assets or liabilities. 

(2)  Income approach: valuation techniques that convert 
estimated future cash flows or income and expenses 
into a single discounted present value.

(3)  Cost approach: valuation techniques that reflect the 
current replacement cost of an asset at its current 
service capacity.

Each valuation technique requires inputs that reflect the 
assumptions that buyers and sellers would use when 
pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about 
risks. When selecting a valuation technique, the Group 
gives priority to those techniques that maximise the use of 
observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable 
inputs. Inputs that are developed using market data (such 
as publicly available information on actual transactions) 
and reflect the assumptions that buyers and sellers 
would generally use when pricing the asset or liability are 
considered observable, whereas inputs for which market 
data is not available and therefore are developed using 
the best information available about such assumptions are 
considered unobservable.

ii.  Fair value hierarchy

AASB 13 requires the disclosure of fair value information 
by level of the fair value hierarchy, which categorises fair 
value measurements into one of three possible levels 
based on the lowest level that an input that is significant 
to the measurement can be categorised into as follows:

(1)  Level 1 

Measurements based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in 
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the 
entity can access at the measurement date. 

(2)  Level 2 

Measurements based on inputs other than quoted 
prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the 
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

(3)  Level 3

Measurements based on unobservable inputs for the 
asset or liability.

The fair values of assets and liabilities that are not 
traded in an active market are determined using one or 
more valuation techniques. These valuation techniques 
maximise, to the extent possible, the use of observable 
market data. If all significant inputs required to 
measure fair value are observable, the asset or liability 
is included in Level 2. If one or more significant inputs 
are not based on observable market data, the asset or 
liability is included in Level 3.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 39

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

The Group would change the categorisation within 
the fair value hierarchy only in the following 
circumstances:

a. 

b. 

if a market that was previously considered active 
(Level 1) became inactive (Level 2 or Level 3) or 
vice versa or

if significant inputs that were previously 
unobservable (Level 3) became observable (Level 2) 
or vice versa.

When a change in the categorisation occurs, the Group 
recognises transfers between levels of the fair value 
hierarchy (i.e. transfers into and out of each level of the 
fair value hierarchy) on the date the event or change in 
circumstances occurred.

r.  Critical accounting estimates and judgements

The directors evaluate estimates and judgements 
incorporated into the financial report based on historical 
knowledge and best available current information. 
Estimates assume a reasonable expectation of future 
events and are based on current trends and economic data, 
obtained both externally and within the Group.

i.  Key Judgements – Exploration and evaluation expenditure

Exploration and evaluation costs are carried forward where 
right of tenure of the area of interest is current. These costs 
are carried forward in respect of an area that has not at 
reporting date reached a stage that permits reasonable 
assessment of the existence of economically recoverable 
reserves, refer to the accounting policy stated in Note 1c 
Exploration and development expenditure.

The carrying value of capitalised expenditure at reporting 
date is $14,137,710 (2015: $13,259,797).

During the financial year, the Group undertook assessment 
of its tenement assets, as a result of this assessment, the 
Group decided to impair some of its exploration assets. 
Refer to Note 11 Exploration and evaluation assets.

ii.  Key Judgements – Environmental issues

Balances disclosed in the financial statements and notes 
thereto are not adjusted for any pending or enacted 
environmental legislation, and the directors understanding 
thereof. At the current stage of the Company’s development 
and its current environmental impact, the directors believe 
such treatment is reasonable and appropriate.

iii.  Key Estimate – Taxation

Balances disclosed in the financial statements and the 
notes thereto, related to taxation, are based on the 
best estimates of directors. These estimates take into 
account both the financial performance and position of 
the Company as they pertain to current income taxation 
legislation, and the directors understanding thereof. 
No adjustment has been made for pending or future 
taxation legislation. The current income tax position 
represents that directors’ best estimate, pending an 
assessment by tax authorities in relevant jurisdictions. 
Refer to Note 5 Income tax.

iv.  Key Estimate — Impairment

The Group assesses impairment at each reporting date by 
evaluating conditions specific to the Group that may lead to 
impairment of assets. Where an impairment trigger exists, 
the recoverable amount of the asset is determined. Value-
in-use calculations performed in assessing recoverable 
amounts incorporate a number of key estimates.

v.  Key Estimate – Share-based payments

The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions 
with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity 
instruments at the date at which they are granted. The 
fair value is determined by an internal valuation using a 
Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the assumptions 
detailed in Note 19 Share-based payments.

s.  Application of new, revised and amending Accounting 

Standards and Interpretations adopted

The Group has adopted all of the new, revised or amending 
Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the 
Australian Accounting Standards Board (“AASB”) that are 
mandatory for the current reporting period. The adoption 
of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations did not 
have any significant impact on the financial performance or 
position of the Group during the financial year.

Any new, revised or amending Accounting Standards or 
Interpretations that are not yet mandatory have not been 
early adopted.

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet 
mandatory or early adopted

Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that 
have recently been issued or amended but are not yet 
mandatory, have not been early adopted by the group for 
the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2016. The 
Group’s assessment of the impact of these new or amended 
Accounting Standards and Interpretations, most relevant to 
the group, are as follows:

i.  AASB 9 Financial Instruments 

This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The standard replaces 
all previous versions of AASB 9 and completes the project 
to replace IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and 
Measurement’. AASB 9 introduces new classification and 
measurement models for financial assets. A financial asset 
shall be measured at amortised cost, if it is held within a 
business model whose objective is to hold assets in order 
to collect contractual cash flows, which arise on specified 
dates and solely principal and interest. All other financial 
instrument assets are to be classified and measured at fair 
value through profit or loss unless the entity makes an 
irrevocable election on initial recognition to present gains 
and losses on equity instruments (that are not held-for-
trading) in other comprehensive income (‘OCI’). For financial 
liabilities, the standard requires the portion of the change 
in fair value that relates to the entity’s own credit risk to 
be presented in OCI (unless it would create an accounting 
mismatch). New simpler hedge accounting requirements are 
intended to more closely align the accounting treatment 
with the risk management activities of the entity. New 
impairment requirements will use an ‘expected credit loss’ 
(‘ECL’) model to recognise an 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)40

NOTE1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES (CONT)

allowance. Impairment will be measured under a 12-month 
ECL method unless the credit risk on a financial instrument 
has increased significantly since initial recognition in 
which case the lifetime ECL method is adopted. The 
standard introduces additional new disclosures. The Group 
will adopt this standard from 1 July 2018 but the impact of 
its adoption is yet to be assessed by the Group.

ii.  AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts and Customers

This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The standard 
provides a single standard for revenue recognition. 
The core principle of the standard is that an entity will 
recognise revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods 
or services to customers in an amount that reflects the 
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled 
in exchange for those goods or services. The standard 
will require: contracts (either written, verbal or implied) 
to be identified, together with the separate performance 
obligations within the contract; determine the transaction 
price, adjusted for the time value of money excluding credit 
risk; allocation of the transaction price to the separate 
performance obligations on a basis of relative stand-alone 
selling price of each distinct good or service, or estimation 
approach if no distinct observable prices exist; and 
recognition of revenue when each performance obligation 
is satisfied. Credit risk will be presented separately as 
an expense rather than adjusted to revenue. For goods, 
the performance obligation would be satisfied when the 
customer obtains control of the goods. For services, the 
performance obligation is satisfied when the service has 
been provided, typically for promises to transfer services to 
customers. For performance obligations satisfied over time, 
an entity would select an appropriate measure of progress 
to determine how much revenue should be recognised 
as the performance obligation is satisfied. Contracts with 
customers will be presented in an entity’s statement of 
financial position as a contract liability, a contract asset, 
or a receivable, depending on the relationship between 
the entity’s performance and the customer’s payment. 
Sufficient quantitative and qualitative disclosure is 
required to enable users to understand the contracts with 
customers; the significant judgements made in applying 
the guidance to those contracts; and any assets recognised 
from the costs to obtain or fulfil a contract with a customer. 
The Group will adopt this standard from 1 July 2018 but 
the impact of its adoption is yet to be assessed by the 
Group.

iii.  AASB 16 Leases 

This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2019. The standard 
replaces AASB 117 ‘Leases’ and for lessees will eliminate 
the classifications of operating leases and finance 
leases. Subject to exceptions, a ‘right-of-use’ asset will be 
capitalised in the statement of financial position, measured 
as the present value of the unavoidable future lease 
payments to be made over the lease term. The exceptions 
relate to short-term leases of 12 months or less and leases 
of low-value assets (such as personal computers and 
small office furniture) where an accounting policy choice 
exists whereby either a ‘right-of-use’ asset is recognised or 
lease payments are expensed to profit or loss as incurred. 
A liability corresponding to the capitalised lease will 
also be recognised, adjusted for lease prepayments, lease 
incentives received, initial direct costs incurred and an 
estimate of any future restoration, removal or dismantling 
costs. Straight-line operating lease expense recognition 
will be replaced with a depreciation charge for the leased 
asset (included in operating costs) and an interest expense 
on the recognised lease liability (included in finance costs). 
In the earlier periods of the lease, the expenses associated 
with the lease under AASB 16 will be higher when 
compared to lease expenses under AASB 117. However 
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and 
Amortisation) results will be improved as the operating 
expense is replaced by interest expense and depreciation 
in profit or loss under AASB 16. For classification within 
the statement of cash flows, the lease payments will 
be separated into both a principal (financing activities) 
and interest (either operating or financing activities) 
component. For lessor accounting, the standard does not 
substantially change how a lessor accounts for leases. The 
Group will adopt this standard from 1 July 2019 but the 
impact of its adoption is yet to be assessed by the Group.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16NOTE 2. REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME

Revenue

Interest received from financial institutions

Management fees

Total Revenue

Other income

Interest received from financial institutions

Total Other Income

NOTE 3. LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX

The following significant expense items are relevant in explaining the financial performance:

Superannuation expense

NOTE 4. AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION

Remuneration of the auditor of the Group for:

Auditing or reviewing the financial reports

Taxation services provided by a related practice of the auditor

Other services

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 41

2016 
 $

4,907

-

4,907

-

-

2015 
 $

19,159

-

19,159

3,064

3,064

2016  
$

2015 
 $

36,200

49,362

2016 
 $

37,000

2,085

20,000

59,085

2015 
 $

38,000

5,812

-

43,812

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT) 
42

NOTE 5. INCOME TAX

Income tax expense/(benefit)

Current tax

Deferred tax

Tax rebate for research and development

Deferred income tax expense included in income tax expense comprises:

Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax assets

(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax liabilities

NOTES

5a

5b

2016 
 $

-

-

(148,608)

(148,608)

- 

 -

-

2015 
$

-

-

-

-

 -

 -

-

Reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie tax payable

The prima facie tax payable/(benefit) on loss from ordinary activities before income tax is 
reconciled to the income tax expense as follows:

Prima facie tax on operating loss at 30% (2015: 30%)

(487,733)

(748,170)

Add/(less)

Tax effect of:

Capital-raising costs deductible

Impairment of exploration expenditure previously capitalised

Share-based payments

Write-off of exploration assets

Other

Deferred tax asset not brought to account

Income tax expense/(benefit) attributable to operating loss

Less rebates:

Tax rebate for research and development

Income tax expense/(benefit) 

The applicable weighted average effective tax rates attributable to operating profit are as 
follows

Balance of franking account at year end

(24,749)

-

47,594

15,438

2,451

(72,468)

313,572

29,011

20,408

17,251

446,999

440,396

-

(148,608)

(148,608)

%

Nil

$

Nil

-

-

-

%

nil

$

nil

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 
NOTE 5. INCOME TAX (CONT)

Deferred tax assets

Tax losses

Provisions and accruals

Other

Set-off deferred tax liabilities 

Net deferred tax assets

Less deferred tax assets not recognised

Net tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities

Exploration expenditure

Set-off deferred tax assets 

Net deferred tax liabilities

Tax losses

Unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised, that may be 
utilised to offset tax liabilities:

Revenue losses

Capital losses

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 43

NOTE

2016 
$

2015 
 $

5a

5b

3,895,970

3,330,219 

41,173

15,019

57,543 

100,245 

3,951,970

3,488,007

-

3,951,970

(3,951,970)

-

3,488,007

(3,488,007)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

12,482,130

11,100,731

691,104

691,104

13,173,234

11,791,835

Potential deferred tax assets attributable to tax losses and exploration expenditure carried forward have not been brought to account 
at 30 June 2016 because the directors do not believe it is appropriate to regard realisation of the deferred tax assets as probable at this 
point in time. These benefits will only be obtained if:

i.  The Group derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit from the deductions for the 

loss and exploration expenditure to be realised.

ii.  The Group continues to comply with conditions for deductibility imposed by law.

iii.  No changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Group in realising the benefit from the deductions for the loss and exploration 

expenditure.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)44

NOTE 6. EARNINGS PER SHARE

a.  Loss from continuing operations for the year

NOTE

2016 
 $

2015 
 $

(1,625,775)

(2,493,900)

2016 
NO.

2015 
NO.

b.  Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year used 

in calculation of basic EPS

398,625,406

266,928,484

c.  Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents per share)

2016
¢

(0.41)

2015 
¢

(0.93)

i.  The Group is in a loss making position and it is unlikely that the conversion to, calling of, or subscription for, ordinary share capital in 
respect of potential ordinary shares would lead to diluted earnings per share that shows an inferior view of the earnings per share. 
Therefore in the event the Company has dilutionary equity instruments on issue, the diluted loss per share for the year ended 30 June 
2016 is the same as basic loss per share, whilst the Company remains loss making.

ii.  There are 177,249,702 (2015: 74,635,171) options over ordinary shares that have vested.

NOTE 7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash at bank

Short-term bank deposits

NOTE

7a

2016 
$

317,758

-

317,758

2015 
$

926,987

16,024

943,011

a.  The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for financial assets and liabilities are disclosed in Note 24 

Financial risk management.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16NOTE 8. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Current

Value-added tax receivable

Trade debtors

Other

Less: Provision for impairment

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 45

NOTE

8a

2016 
 $

43,346

18,782

648

(5,068)

57,708

2015 
$

72,169

24,261

4,890

(5,038)

96,282

a.  Value-added tax (VAT) is a generic term for the broad-based consumption taxes that the Group is exposed to such as: Australia (GST); 

Sweden (MOMS); and in Mauritanian (VAT).

b.  The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for financial assets and liabilities are disclosed in Note 24 

Financial risk management.

NOTE 9. FINANCIAL ASSETS

Current

Bonds and prepayments

NOTE 10. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Non-current

Plant and equipment

Accumulated depreciation

Motor vehicles

Accumulated depreciation

Total plant and equipment

Movements in carrying amounts

Balance at the beginning of year

Additions

Depreciation expense

Carrying amount at the end of year

2016 
 $

43,625

43,625

2015 
$

44,157

44,157

2016 
$

2015 
 $

160,102

(160,102)

-

-

-

-

-

1,602

-

(1,602)

-

160,102

(158,500)

1,602

-

-

-

1,602

2,994

3,284

(4,676)

1,602

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)46

NOTE 11. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS

Non-current

Exploration expenditure capitalised:

Exploration and evaluation phase at cost

Add: 

Effect of exchange rate changes on exploration and evaluation assets

Less:   Exploration expenditure impairment

Net carrying value

a.  The value of the Group interest in exploration expenditure is dependent upon:

•  The continuance of the Group’s rights to tenure of the areas of interest.

•  The results of future exploration.

NOTE

11b

11a,b

2016 
 $

2015 
 $

14,099,992

37,718

-

14,137,710

14,347,295

(42,258)

(1,045,240)

13,259,797

•  The recoupment of costs through successful development and exploitation of the areas of interest, or alternatively,  

by their sale.

The Group’s exploration properties may be subjected to claim(s) under Native Title (or jurisdictional equivalent), or contain sacred 
sites, or sites of significance to the indigenous people of Sweden and Mauritania. 

As a result, exploration properties or areas within the tenements may be subject to exploration restrictions, mining restrictions and/or 
claims for compensation. At this time, it is not possible to quantify whether such claims exist, or the quantum of such claims.

b.  The Group has not recorded any impairment to the carrying value of its Mauritanian and Swedish tenements for the  

financial year ended 30 June 2016. 

In the previous year, the Group recorded an impairment of $1,045,240. This impairment arose from the unsuccessful appeal of a 
decision made by the Swedish mining authorities not to grant an extension to one of the Group’s tenements. As a result, the Group 
recognised during the financial year, an impairment against the carrying value of the tenement for $243,086. In addition, the Group 
relinquished the Oued El Foule Nord and Saabia tenements in Mauritania as not being required for the Tiris project. As a result the 
Group recognised during the financial year, an impairment against the carrying value of the tenements of $802,154.

NOTE 12. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Current

Unsecured

Trade payables

Accrued expenses

Other taxes payable

NOTE

12a

2016 
 $

2015 
 $

242,496

257,527

50,821

550,844

232,876

102,223

66,246

401,345

a.  Trade payables are non-interest bearing and arise from the usual operating activities of the Group. Trade payables and other payables 

and accruals, except directors’ fees, are usually settled within the lower of terms of trade or 30 days.

b.  The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for financial assets and liabilities are disclosed in Note 24 

Financial risk management.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 
 
 
 
NOTE 13. SHORT-TERM PROVISIONS

Current

Employee benefits

Number of employees at year end

NOTE 14. BORROWINGS

Current

Convertible notes

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 47

2016 
 $

165,251

165,251

2016 
NO.

4

2016 
 $

-

-

2015 
 $

138,639

138,639

2015 
NO.

4

2015 
 $

43,040

43,040

a.  Short-term borrowings comprise premium funding for insurance policies, repayable within 12 months.

b.  On 28 February 2014, Aura Energy Limited entered into a financing arrangement to provide up to $3,775,000 over 24 months. Under 
the agreement with The Australian Special Opportunity Fund, LP, managed by The Lind Partners, LLC, Aura Energy Limited received 
$325,000, in the form of a $250,000 convertible note and $75,000 as a prepayment for placement of ordinary shares in Aura Energy 
Limited. Lind will further invest in tranches of $75,000, in monthly share subscriptions, over the next two years. The convertible notes 
and shares will be issued at a 10% discount to a specified three day volume weighted share price.

Further key terms of the agreement are as follows:

•  The $250,000 convertible note is secured by the issue of 2,200,000 shares. Aura Energy Limited has the ability to repurchase the 

Note at a premium to the issue price during the first 90 days of the agreement.

•  An issue of 2,946,378 shares as a commencement fees for the provision of the funding facility.

The issue of 2,600,000 options with an exercise price of 4.8 cents and the three year expiration date.

The convertible note liability is measured at its present value. 

During the financial ended 30 June 2015, Lind converted $200,000 of the $250,000 convertible note into 11,111,111 fully paid 
ordinary shares of the Company.

On 11 February 2016, Lind converted $15,000 of its convertible notes into shares under the terms of the Share Placement approved 
by shareholders at the general meeting on 5 November 2015.

Lind was issued 1,224,500 fully paid shares at 1.225 cents per share and 1,224,500 options over ordinary shares at an exercise price 
of 2.5 cents per option over ordinary share

On 18 February 2016, Lind converted the remaining balance, $35,000, of the convertible notes into ordinary shares of the Company 
in accordance with the financing agreement executed on 28 February 2014. Under the terms of the financing agreement, Lind 
was entitled to 2,916,667 fully paid ordinary shares of the Company, net of 2,200,000 collateral shares previous issued to Lind in 
accordance with the financing agreement. 

The Company issued Lind 716,667 fully paid shares at 1.2 cents per share to extinguish its obligations under the financing agreement.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT) 
 
48

NOTE 15. ISSUED CAPITAL

The Company has issued share capital amounting to 457,048,412  
(2015: 335,065,783 fully paid ordinary shares at no par value.

a.  Equity raised during the financial year

At the beginning of the reporting period

Shares issued during the year:

4,166,667 Shares issued on 9 July 2014

9,722,222 Shares issued on 24 July 2014

52,428,510 Shares issued on 9 September 2014

1,527,303 Shares10 October 2014

292 Shares issued on 13 October 2014

3,571,429 Shares issued on 20 October 2014

355,104 Shares issued on 5 December 2014

6,874,752 Shares issued on 19 December 2014 

40,762,340 Shares issued on 22 April 2015

9,440,000 Shares issued on 12 June 2015

1,055,174 Shares issued on 12 June 2015

1,388,889 Shares issued on 12 June 2015

3,697,952 Shares issued on 29 June 2015

4,250,000 Shares issued on 29 June 2015

48,660,000 Shares issued on 29 September 2015

851,442 Shares issued on 15 October 2015

13,451,801 Shares issued on 25 November 2015

1,008,004 Shares issued on 9 December 2015

3,267,311 Shares issued on 14 December 2015

8,163,265 Shares issued on 15 December 2015

18,755,093 Shares issued on 12 February 2016

1,224,500 Shares issued on 12 February 2016

716,667 Shares issued on 18 February 2016

22,943,877 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

1,074,615 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

1,099,578 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

766,476 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

Transaction costs relating to share issues

At reporting date

NOTE

15a

15a.i

15a.ii

15a.iii

15a.iv

15a.v

15a.vi

15a.vii

15a.viii

15a.ix

15a.x

15a.xi

15a.xii

15a.xiii

15a.xiv

15a.xv

15a.xvi

15a.xvii

15a.xviii

15a.xix

15a.xx

15a.xxi

15a.xxii

15a.xxiii

15a.xxiv

15a.xxv

15a.xxvi

15a.xxvii

2016 
 $

2015 
 $

32,784,203

31,311,988

31,311,988

27,935,558

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

596,085

18,253

164,785

18,253

60,000

100,000

229,750

15,000

35,000

281,062

30,000

18,253

13,375

75,000

175,000

1,572,855

60,250

18

75,000

11,358

204,244

1,019,059

236,000

30,000

25,000

101,196

106,250

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(107,601)

32,784,203

(314,800)

31,311,988

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 
NOTE 15. ISSUED CAPITAL (CONT)

At the beginning of the reporting period

Ordinary shares issued during the financial year:

4,166,667 Shares issued on 9 July 2014

9,722,222 Shares issued on 24 July 2014

52,428,510 Shares issued on 9 September 2014

1,527,303 Shares issued on 10 October 2014

292 Shares issued on 13 October 2014

3,571,429 Shares issued on 20 October 2014

355,104 Shares issued on 5 December 2014

6,874,752 Shares issued on 19 December 2014

40,762,340 Shares issued on 22 April 2015

9,440,000 Shares issued on 12 June 2015

1,055,174 Shares issued on 12 June 2015

1,388,889 Shares issued on 12 June 2015

3,697,952 Shares issued on 29 June 2015

4,250,000 Shares issued on 29 June 2015

48,660,000 Shares issued on 29 September 2015

851,442 Shares issued on 15 October 2015

13,451,801 Shares issued on 25 November 2015

1,008,004 Shares issued on 9 December 2015

3,267,311 Shares issued on 14 December 2015

8,163,265 Shares issued on 15 December 2015

18,755,093 Shares issued on 12 February 2016

1,224,500 Shares issued on 12 February 2016

716,667 Shares issued on 18 February 2016

22,943,877 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

1,074,615 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

1,099,578 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

766,476 Shares issued on 10 May 2016

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 49

2016 
NO.

2015 
NO.

335,065,783

195,825,149

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

48,660,000

851,442

13,451,801

1,008,004

3,267,311

8,163,265

18,755,093

1,224,500

716,667

22,943,877

1,074,615

1,099,578

766,476

4,166,667

9,722,222

52,428,510

1,527,303

292

3,571,429

355,104

6,874,752

40,762,340

9,440,000

1,055,174

1,388,889

3,697,952

4,250,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

NOTE

15a.i

15a.ii

15a.iii

15a.iv

15a.v

15a.vi

15a.vii

15a.viii

15a.ix

15a.x

15a.xi

15a.xii

15a.xiii

15a.xiv

15a.xv

15a.xvi

15a.xvii

15a.xviii

15a.xix

15a.xx

15a.xxi

15a.xxii

15a.xxiii

15a.xxiv

15a.xxv

15a.xxvi

15a.xxvii

At reporting date

457,048,412

335,065,783

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)50

NOTE 15. ISSUED CAPITAL (CONT)

i. 

ii. 

iii. 

iv. 

v. 

vi. 

vii. 

viii. 

ix. 

x. 

xi. 

xii. 

xiii. 

xiv. 

xv. 

xvi. 

Issued under financing agreement with ASOF.

Issued on conversion by ASOF of $175,000 in convertible notes into fully paid ordinary shares.

Issued pursuant to rights issue to shareholders.

Issued to settle amounts due to consultants for services rendered.

Issued on conversion of options over ordinary shares into fully paid ordinary shares.

Issued under financing agreement with ASOF.

Issued to settle amounts due to consultants for services rendered.

Issued to directors in lieu of entitlement to cash emoluments.

Issued pursuant to share placement.

Issued pursuant to share purchase plan to shareholders.

Issued to corporate advisor under capital raising agreement.

Issued on conversion by ASOF of $25,000 in convertible notes into fully paid ordinary shares.

Issued to directors in lieu of entitlement to cash emoluments.

Issued pursuant to shortfall under share purchase plan.

Issued pursuant to Share Placement (through WH Ireland Limited).

Issued to Executive Chairman/Managing Director pursuant to Contract of Employment.

xvii. 

Issued pursuant to Share Placement (through WH Ireland Limited).

xviii. 

Issued to Executive Chairman/Managing Director pursuant to Contract of Employment.

xix. 

xx. 

xxi. 

Issued pursuant to Engagement Letter between the Company and Hartley Limited.

Issued pursuant to Share Placement to ASOF.

Issued pursuant to Share Placement.

xxii. 

Issued pursuant to conversion By ASOP of convertible notes into fully paid ordinary shares.

xxiii. 

Issued pursuant to conversion by ASOP of convertible notes into fully paid ordinary shares.

xxiv. 

Issued of shares to sophisticated and professional investors for working capital.

xxv. 

Issued pursuant to Engagement Letter between Company and Hartley Limited.

xxvi. 

Issued to Executive Chairman/Managing Director pursuant to Contract of Employment.

xxvii. 

Issued to Executive Chairman/Managing Director pursuant to Contract of Employment.

b.  Options

For information relating to the Aura Energy Limited employee options scheme, including details of options issued, issued and 
lapsed during the financial year, and the options outstanding at balance date, refer to Note 19 Share-based payments. The total 
number of options on issue is as follows:

Listed options

Unlisted options

2016 
 NO.

27,226,166

170,123,536

2015 
 NO.

27,226,166

86,159,005

197,349,702

113,385,171

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 51

NOTE 15. ISSUED CAPITAL (CONT)

c.  Capital Management

i.  Capital management policy

The directors’ objectives when managing capital are to ensure that the Group can fund its operations and continue as a going 
concern, so that they may continue to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders.

Due to the nature of the Group’s activities, being mineral exploration, the Group does not have ready access to credit facilities, 
with the primary source of funding being equity raisings. Therefore, the focus of the Group’s capital risk management is the current 
working capital position against the requirements of the Group to meet exploration programmes and corporate overheads. 
The Group’s strategy is to ensure appropriate liquidity is maintained to meet anticipated operating requirements, with a view to 
initiating appropriate capital raisings as required. 

ii.  Current ratio

The current ratio the Group at 30 June 2016 and 30 June 2015 was as follows:

Current ratio

iii.  Working capital position

The working capital position of the Group at 30 June 2016 and 30 June 2015 was as follows:

NOTE

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets

Trade and other payables

Short-term borrowings

Short-term provisions

Working capital position / (deficit)

NOTE 16. RESERVES

Option reserve

Foreign exchange reserve

a.  Option reserve

NOTE

7

8

9

12

14

13

NOTE

16a

16b

2016 
NO.

0.58

2016 
NO.

317,758

57,708

43,625

(550,844)

-

(165,251)

(297,004)

2016 
 $

495,651

533,891

1,029,542

2015 
 NO.

1.86

2015 
 NO.

943,011

96,282

44,157

(401,345)

(43,040)

(138,639)

500,426

2015 
 $

398,924

502,328

901,252

The option reserve records items recognised as expenses on the value of employee and consultant share options.

b.  Foreign exchange translation reserve

The foreign exchange reserve records exchange differences arising on translation of foreign controlled subsidiary.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)52

NOTE 17. CONTROLLED ENTITIES

CONTROLLED ENTITIES

Aura Energy Sweden AB

GCM Africa Uranium Limited

COUNTRY OF  
INCORPORATION

Sweden

United Kingdom

CLASS OF  
SHARES

Ordinary

Ordinary

PERCENTAGE OWNED

2016

100%

100%

2015

100%

100%

a. 

Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost.

NOTE 18. CASH FLOW INFORMATION

a.  Reconciliation of cash flow from operations to loss after income tax

Loss after income tax 

Cash flows excluded from profit attributable to operating activities

Non-cash flows in profit from ordinary activities:

Share-based payments expense

Payments to employees and corporate advisor by way of shares

Net interest on convertible notes

Depreciation

Effects of foreign exchange on translation

Impairment of exploration expenditure previously capitalised

Reclassification of insurance funding

2016 
$

2016 
 $

(1,625,775)

(2,493,900)

158,645

158,134

6,960

1,602

2,017

-

-

96,704

305,441

57,304

4,676

9,379

1,045,240

(32,416)

Capitalised exploration expenditure included in cash flows from operations

(1,110,965)

(1,438,205)

Other

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects of purchase and disposal of subsidiaries:

(Increase)/decrease in receivables and prepayments

Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables

Increase/(decrease) in provisions

Cash flow from operations

b.  Credit standby facilities

The Group has no credit standby facilities.

c.  Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

The Group has no non-cash investing and financing activities.

-

1,152

14,845

438,374

26,612

11,377

(93,196)

32,558

(1,929,551)

(2,493,886)

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16NOTE 19. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 53

2016 
$

2015 
 $

Share-based payment expense

158,645

96,704

a.  The above share-based payment expense is comprised of the following arrangements in place at 30 June 2016:

On 9 June 2015, the following options over ordinary shares were granted to the Executive Chairman and Managing Director of the 
Company in the following tranches:

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.10 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2018.

•  6,250,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 February 2019.

•  2,500,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2019.

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2020.

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2021.

$158,645 was the deemed cost of the options over ordinary shares for the financial year.

The options over ordinary shares hold no voting or dividend rights and are not transferable. At balance date, no options over 
ordinary shares have been exercised or forfeited and the 35,000,000 options over ordinary shares remain.

b.  The above share-based payment expense is comprised of the following arrangements in place at 30 June 2015:

On 24 November 2013, the following options over ordinary shares were granted to directors of the Company:

•  2,000,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 13 January 2016.

•  2,250,000 at an exercise price of $0.20 each. The options are exercisable on or before 13 January 2016.

•  2,000,000 at an exercise price of $0.20 each. The options are exercisable on or before 13 July 2016.

•  4,625,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 13 January 2016.

•  4,625,000 at an exercise price of $0.20 each. The options are exercisable on or before 13 July 2016.

On 9 June 2015, the following options over ordinary shares were granted to the Executive Chairman and Managing Director of the 
Company in the following tranches:

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.10 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2018.

•  6,250,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 February 2019.

•  2,500,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2019.

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2020.

•  8,750,000 at an exercise price of $0.15 each. The options are exercisable on or before 9 June 2021.

The options over ordinary shares hold no voting or dividend rights and are not transferable. At balance date, 6,625,000 lapsed and 
the remaining 8,875,000 options have not been exercised or forfeited and remain.

c.  Share-based payments recognised directly in equity and in place at 30 June 2016:

On 11 November 2014, the Company granted 12,500,000 options over ordinary shares to its corporate advisors pursuant to a 
capital raising agreement at an exercise price of $0.07 each. The options over ordinary shares are exercisable on or before 11 
November 2018. $42,233 (2015: $70,389) was deemed transaction costs for the financial year under the capital raising agreement 
and has been recognized as such in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.

d.  Share-based payments recognised directly in equity and in place at 30 June 2015:

On 8 March 2014, 2,600,000 options over ordinary shares were issued under an agreement with The Australian Special 
Opportunity Fund, LP, managed by The Lind Partners, LLC, to take up ordinary shares at an exercise price of $0.048 each. The 
options over ordinary shares expire 6 March 2017. $56,661 was deemed a transaction costs under the agreement and has been 
recognised as such in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)54

NOTE 19. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONT)

a.  Movement in share-based payment arrangements during the period

A summary of the movements of all Company options issued as share-based payments is as follows:

2016

2015

NUMBER OF OPTIONS

WEIGHTED AVERAGE 
EXERCISE PRICE

NUMBER OF OPTIONS

WEIGHTED AVERAGE 
EXERCISE PRICE

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

59,745,000

Issued

Exercised

Expired

Outstanding at year-end

Exercisable at year-end

-

-

(2,820,000)

56,925,000

36,825,000

$0.1940

$0.1132

-

26,745,000

47,500,000

-

($0.2505)

(14,500,000)

$0.1206

$0.1117

59,745,000

20,995,000

$0.1940

$0.1132

-

($0.2013)

$0.1267

$0.1463

The weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding at year end is 2.5226 years (2015: 1.8874 years). The 
weighted average exercise price of outstanding shares at the end of the reporting period is $0.1206 (2015: $0.1267).

b.  Fair value of options grants during the period

The Company did not grant any options over ordinary shares during the financial year ended 30 June 2016.

In the previous financial year, the fair value of the options granted to employees is deemed to represent the value of the 
employee services received over the vesting period.

The weighted average fair value of options over ordinary shares granted during the previous financial year was $0.1132. These 
values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, applying the following inputs to options issued this year:

Grant date:

Grant date share price:

Option exercise price:

Number of options issued:

Remaining life (years):

Expected share price volatility:

Risk-free interest rate:

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

$0.10

15,000,000

 3.28

10 June 2015

$0.021

107%

2.0%

$0.15

20,000,000

4.98

Historical volatility has been the basis for determining expected share price volatility as it is assumed that this is indicative of 
future movements.

The life of the options is based on the historical exercise patterns, which may not eventuate in the future.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16NOTE 20. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION

a.  Key management personnel (“KMP”)

The names are positions of KMP are as follows:

PD Reeve 

Executive Chairman and Managing Director

Dr R Beeson 

Non-executive director

BF Fraser 

JC Perkins 

SF Zillwood 

JM Madden  

b.  KMP compensation

Non-executive director

Non-executive director

Company Secretary (from 1 July 2015 to 31 March 2016)

Company Secretary (from 31 March 2016 to 30 June 2016)

The totals of remuneration paid to KMP during the year are as follows:

Short-term employee benefits

Post-employment benefits

Share-based payments in equity

Share-based payments in options

Other long term benefits

Termination benefits

Payments to contractors for accounting and secretarial services

Total

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 55

2016 
 $

445,200

36,200

100,000

158,645

-

-

92,448

832,493

2015 
 $

624,900

54,850

50,000

96,704

-

-

102,816

929,270

Refer to the Remuneration Report contained in the Director’s Report for details of the remuneration paid to each member of the 
Group’s KMP for the year ended 30 June 2016.

NOTE 21. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions between related parties are on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favourable than those available to 
other parties unless otherwise stated.

Other transactions with key management personnel are set out in the Remuneration Report, there are no other related party 
transactions.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT) 
 
 
56

NOTE 22. COMMITMENTS

a.  Exploration expenditure commitments:

Exploration tenement minimum expenditure requirements

335,996

101,482

2016 
 $

2015 
$

Payable:

not later than 12 months

between 12 months and 5 years

greater than 5 years

The Group has no contracted exploration expenditure, however the Group has accounted for 
core asset tenement renewals as expenditure the Group is committed to.

b.  Operating lease commitments:

Operating leases contracted for or committed to but not capitalised in the financial statements

Payable:

not later than 12 months

between 12 months and 5 years

greater than 5 years

296,418

39,578

-

335,996

53,460

87,740

-

141,200

52,947

48,535

-

101,482

16,636

-

-

16,636

The Group shares premises with a number of companies. Balances stated represent the maximum gross amount payable, prior to 
reimbursement from other parties.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 57

NOTE 23. OPERATING SEGMENTS

a. 

Identification of reportable segments

The Group operates predominantly in the mining industry. This comprises exploration and evaluation of uranium projects. Inter-
segment transactions are priced at cost to the Consolidated Group.

The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are provided to the Board of Directors on a 
monthly basis. Management has identified the operating segments based on the two principal locations of its projects – Sweden 
and Mauritania. The Group also maintains a corporate function primarily responsible for overall management of the operating 
segments, raising capital and distributing funds to operating segments. 

Corporate expenses include administration and regulatory expenses arising from operating an ASX listed entity. 

Segment assets include the costs to acquire tenements and the capitalised exploration costs of those tenements Financial assets 
including cash and cash equivalents, and investments in financial assets, are reported in the Treasury segment.

b.  Basis of accounting for purposes of reporting by operating segments

i.  Accounting policies adopted

Unless stated otherwise, all amounts reported to the board of directors, being the chief decision maker with respect to operating 
segments, are determined in accordance with accounting policies that are consistent to those adopted in the annual financial 
statements of the Group.

ii. 

Inter-segment transactions

An internally determined transfer price is set for all inter-segment sales. This price is reset quarterly and is based on what 
would be realised in the event the sale was made to an external party at arm’s length. All such transactions are eliminated on 
consolidation of the Group’s financial statements.

Corporate charges are allocated to reporting segments based on the segments’ overall proportion of revenue generation within 
the Group. The board of directors believes this is representative of likely consumption of head office expenditure that should be 
used in assessing segment performance and cost recoveries.

Inter-segment loans payable and receivable are initially recognised at the consideration received/to be received net of transaction 
costs. If inter-segment loans receivable and payable are not on commercial terms, these are not adjusted to fair value based on 
market interest rates. This policy represents a departure from that applied to the statutory financial statements.

iii.  Segment assets

Where an asset is used across multiple segments, the asset is allocated to that segment that receives majority economic value 
from that asset. In the majority of instances, segment assets are clearly identifiable on the basis of their nature and physical 
location.

iv.  Segment liabilities

Liabilities are allocated to segments where there is a direct nexus between the incurrence of the liability and the operations 
of the segment. Borrowings and tax liabilities are generally considered to relate to the Group as a whole and are not allocated. 
Segment liabilities include trade and other payables and certain direct borrowings.

v.  Unallocated items

The following items of revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities are not allocated to operating segments as they are not considered 
part of the core operations of any segment:

•  Non-exploration impairment of assets and other non-recurring items of revenue or expense

• 

Income tax expense

•  Deferred tax assets and liabilities

•  Current tax liabilities

•  Other financial liabilities

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)58

NOTE 23. OPERATING SEGMENTS (CONT)

FOR THE YEAR TO 30 JUNE 2016

Segment revenue

Segment results

Amounts not included in segment results but reviewed by Board:

Expenses not directly allocable to identifiable segments or areas of interest

SWEDEN 
EXPLORATION 
$

MAURITANIA 
EXPLORATION 
$

-

-

-

(51,461)

CORPORATE 
$

4,907

4,907

TOTAL 
$

4,907

(46,554)

Accounting and audit fees

Computers and communications

Depreciation

Employee benefits expense

Finance costs

Impairment

Insurance

Consulting fees and corporate advisory

Public relations

Rent and utilities

Share-based payment expenses

Share registry and listing fees

Travel and accommodation

AIM listing costs

Other expenses

Tax rebate for research and development

Loss after income tax

AS AT 30 JUNE 2016

Segment assets

Unallocated assets:

 Trade and other receivables

 Plant and equipment

 Other non-current assets

Total assets

Segment asset increases for the period:

Capital expenditure-exploration

Less: Write-off of exploration assets

Segment liabilities

Unallocated liabilities:

 Trade and other payables

 Short-term provisions

 Short-term borrowings

Total liabilities

(149,416)

(44,193)

(1,602)

(711,929)

(8,171)

-

(51,378)

(223,149)

(22,472)

(39,847)

(158,645)

(79,385)

(49,273)

(165,840)

(22,529)

148,608

(1,625,775)

6,484,992

7,647,916

366,185

14,459,093

173,898

704,014

-

-

173,898

704,014

30,474

-

-

-

-

-

57,708

-

-

14,556,801

877,912

-

877,912

30,474

520,370

165,251

-

716,095

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 59

NOTE 23. OPERATING SEGMENTS (CONT)

FOR THE YEAR TO 30 JUNE 2015

Segment revenue

Segment results

Amounts not included in segment results but reviewed by Board:

Expenses not directly allocable to identifiable segments or areas of interest

SWEDEN 
EXPLORATION 
$

MAURITANIA 
EXPLORATION 
$

CORPORATE 
$

TOTAL 
$

-

-

22,223

22,223

(264,389)

(802,155)

22,223

(1,044,321)

Accounting and audit fees

Business development

Computers and communications

Depreciation

Employee benefits expense

Finance costs

Insurance

Consulting fees and corporate advisory 

Public relations

Rent and utilities

Share-based payment expenses

Share registry and listing fees

Travel and accommodation

Other expenses

Loss after income tax

AS AT 30 JUNE 2015

Segment assets

Unallocated assets:

 Trade and other receivables

 Plant and equipment

 Other non-current assets

Total assets

Segment asset increases for the period:

Capital expenditure-exploration

Less: Write-off of exploration assets

Segment liabilities

Unallocated Liabilities:

 Trade and other payables

 Short term provisions

 Short-term borrowings

Total liabilities

(126,869)

(6,000)

(27,150)

(4,676)

(638,556)

(60,564)

(39,451)

(182,309)

(67,526)

(33,168)

(96,704)

(63,522)

(92,836)

(10,248)

(2,493,900)

6,311,094

6,943,902

991,969

14,246,965

252,046

1,326,688

(243,085)

(802,155)

8,961

524,533

5,032

115,793

-

-

-

-

96,282

1,602

-

14,344,849

1,578,734

(1,045,240)

533,494

120,825

280,520

138,639

43,040

583,024

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)60

NOTE 24. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

a.  Financial risk management policies

This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, its objectives, policies and procedures for 
measuring and managing risk, and the management of capital.

The Group’s financial instruments consist mainly of deposits with banks, short-term investments, and accounts payable and 
receivable.

The Group does not speculate in the trading of derivative instruments.

A summary of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities is shown below:

FLOATING
INTEREST
RATE
$

FIXED
INTEREST
RATE
$

NON-
INTEREST 
BEARING
$

 2016 
TOTAL
$

FLOATING
INTEREST
RATE
$

FIXED
INTEREST
RATE
$

NON-
INTEREST 
BEARING
$

 2015 
TOTAL
$

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents 

317,758

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets

Total financial assets

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities at amortised cost 

Trade and other payables

Short-term borrowings

Total financial liabilities

-

-

317,758

-

-

-

Net financial assets

317,758

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

317,758

943,011

57,708

57,708

43,625

43,625

-

-

-

-

-

943,011

96,282

96,282

16,024

28,133

44,157

101,333

419,091

943,011

16,024

124,415 1,083,450

550,844

550,844

-

-

550,844

550,844

-

-

-

-

401,345

401,345

43,040

-

43,040

43,040

401,345

444,385

(449,511)

(131,753)

943,011

(27,016) 

(276,930)

639,065

b.  Specific financial risk exposures and management

The main risk the Group is exposed to through its financial instruments are credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk consisting of 
interest rate, foreign currency risk and equity price risk.

The board of directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework. The board 
of directors has adopted practices designed to identify significant areas of business risk and to effectively manage those risks in 
accordance with the risk profile. This includes assessing, monitoring and managing risks for the Group and setting appropriate risk 
limits and controls. The Group is not of a size nor is its affairs of such complexity to justify the establishment of a formal system for 
risk management and associated controls. Instead, the Board approves all expenditure, is intimately acquainted with all operations 
and discuss all relevant issues at the Board meetings. The operational and other compliance risk management have also been 
assessed and found to be operating efficiently and effectively. 

i.  Credit risk

Exposure to credit risk relating to financial assets arises from the potential non-performance by counterparties of contract 
obligations that could lead to a financial loss to the Group

The Group does not have any material credit risk exposure to any single receivable or Group of receivables under financial 
instruments entered into by the Group.

Credit risk exposures

The maximum exposure to credit risk is that to its alliance partners and that is limited to the carrying amount, net of any 
provisions for impairment of those assets, as disclosed in the statement of financial position and notes to the financial 
statements. 

Credit risk related to balances with banks and other financial institutions is managed by the Group in accordance with 
approved Board policy. Such policy requires that surplus funds are only invested with financial institutions residing in 
Australia, where ever possible.

Impairment losses

Group’s financial assets that are past due total $nil (2015: $nil).

There has been no allowance for impairment in respect of the financial assets of the Group during this year.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 61

NOTE 24. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONT)

ii.  Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the Group might encounter difficulty in settling its debts or otherwise meeting its 
obligations related to financial liabilities.

The Group manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and ensuring sufficient cash and 
marketable securities are available to meet the current and future commitments of the Group. Due to the nature of the Group’s 
activities, being mineral exploration, the Group does not have ready access to credit facilities, with the primary source of funding 
being equity raisings. The board of directors constantly monitor the state of equity markets in conjunction with the Group’s current 
and future funding requirements, with a view to initiating appropriate capital raisings as required. Any surplus funds are invested 
with major financial institutions.

The financial liabilities of the Group are confined to trade and other payables as disclosed in the statement of financial position. 
All trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and due within 30 days of the reporting date.

iii.  Market risk 

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the 
Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and 
control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.

The Board meets on a regular basis and considers the Group’s exposure currency and interest rate risk.

(1)  Interest rate risk

Exposure to interest rate risk arises on financial assets and financial liabilities recognised at the end of the reporting period 
whereby a future change in interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair value of fixed rate financial instruments. The 
Group is also exposed to earnings volatility on floating rate instruments.

Interest rate risk is not material to the Group as no debt arrangements have been entered into, and movement in interest rates 
on the Group’s financial assets is not material.

(2)  Foreign exchange risk 

Exposure to foreign exchange risk may result in the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument fluctuating due to 
movement in foreign exchange rates of currencies in which the Group holds financial instruments which are other than the 
Australian dollars functional currency of the Group.

With instruments being held by overseas operations, fluctuations in foreign currencies may impact on the Group’s financial 
results. The Group’s exposure to foreign exchange risk is minimal; however the Board continues to review this exposure 
regularly.

(3)  Price risk

Price risk relates to the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes 
in market prices.

The Group is exposed to securities price risk on investments held for trading or for medium to longer terms. 

The investment in listed equities has been valued at the market price prevailing at balance date. Management of this 
investment’s price risk is by ongoing monitoring of the value with respect to any impairment.

At balance date, the Group does not hold financial instruments that would give rise to price risk.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)62

NOTE 24. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONT)

iv.  Sensitivity analyses

(1)  Interest rates

The following table illustrates sensitivities to the Group’s exposures to changes in interest rates. The table indicates 
the impact on how profit and equity values reported at balance sheet date would have been affected by changes in 
the relevant risk variable that management considers to be reasonably possible. These sensitivities assume that the 
movement in a particular variable is independent of other variables.

A change of 100 basis points in the interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/(decreased) equity and profit 
or loss by the amounts shown below. The analysis was performed on a change of 100 basis points for 2016.

Year ended 30 June 2016

± 100 basis points change in interest rates

Year ended 30 June 2015

± 100 basis points change in interest rates

(2)  Foreign exchange

PROFIT 
$

EQUITY 
$

±6,576

±9,929

±7,788

±7,788

The Group main exposure to foreign currency risk is to Swedish Krona (SEK) for assets the Group holds through its 
Swedish subsidiary, Aura Energy Sweden AB. The following table illustrates sensitivities to the Group’s exposures to 
changes in the SEK rate. The table indicates the impact on how profit and equity values reported at balance sheet date 
would have been affected by changes in the relevant risk variable that management considers to be reasonably possible. 
These sensitivities assume that the movement in a particular variable is independent of other variables.

Year ended 30 June 2016

± 10% of Australian dollar strengthening/weakening against the SEK

Year ended 30 June 2015

± 10% of Australian dollar strengthening/weakening against the SEK

v.  Net fair values

(1)  Fair value estimation

PROFIT 
$

EQUITY 
$

Nil

Nil

+65,849

-59,118

+75,050

-105,458

The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities are presented in the table below and can be compared to their 
carrying values as presented in the statement of financial position. Fair values are those amounts at which an asset could 
be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.

Cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, and trade and other payables are short-term investments in nature 
whose carrying value is equivalent to fair value.

The methods and assumptions used in determining the fair values of financial instruments are disclosed in the accounting 
policy notes specific to the asset or liability.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 63

NOTE 24. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONT)

vi.  Financial liability and asset maturity analysis

Financial liabilities due for payment

Trade and other payables

Short-term borrowings

Total contractual outflows

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents 

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets

Total anticipated inflows

Net (outflow)/inflow on financial instruments

WITHIN 1 YEAR

2016 
$

2015 
$

TOTAL

2016 
$

550,844

-

550,844

317,758

57,708

43,625

419,091

(131,753)

401,345

43,040

444,385

943,011

96,282

44,157

1,083,450

639,065

550,844

-

550,844

317,758

57,708

43,625

419,091

(131,753)

2015 
$

401,345

43,040

444,385

943,011

96,282

44,157

1,083,450

639,065

NOTE 25. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE
On 12 September 2016 and 16 September 2016, the Company completed listing of its shares on the Alternative Investment Market in 
London and an Australian Placement which raised $5,002,677 (before costs). 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)64

NOTE 26. PARENT ENTITY DISCLOSURES

a.  Financial position of Aura Energy Limited

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets

Total current assets

Non-current assets

Plant and equipment

Financial assets

Other assets

Total non-current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Short-term provisions

Short-term borrowings

Total current liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Issued capital

Option reserve

Accumulated losses

Total equity

b.  Financial assets

NOTE

26b

2016 
 $

299,974

24,227

43,625

367,826

-

8,317,554

5,871,421

14,188,975

14,556,801

520,370

165,264

-

685,634

685,634

2015 
 $

910,881

57,242

44,157

1,012,280

1,602

8,158,529

5,167,407

13,327,538

14,339,818

396,314

138,639

43,040

577,993

577,993

13,871,167

13,761,825

32,784,203

599,802

31,311988

398,924

(19,512,838)

(17,949,087)

13,871,167

13,761,825

Loans to subsidiaries

Shares in controlled entities at cost

Net carrying value

26b.i

6,410,654

1,906,900

8,317,554

6,251,629

1,906,900

8,158,529

i.  Loans are provided by the parent entity to its controlled entities to fund their activities. The eventual recovery of loans and investments will be dependent upon 

the successful commercial application of these projects or their sale to third parties.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16NOTE 26. PARENT ENTITY DISCLOSURES (CONT)

c.  Financial performance of Aura Energy Limited

Loss for the year 

Other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income 

FiNANCiAL stAtEMENts 65

2016 
 $

2015 
$

(1,433,556)

(2,853,498)

-

-

(1,433,556)

(2,853,498)

d.  Guarantees entered into by Aura Energy Limited for the debts of its subsidiaries

There are no guarantees entered into by Aura Energy Limited for the debts of its subsidiaries as at 30 June 2016  
(2015: none).

e.  Contingent liabilities of Aura Energy Limited

There are no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2016, other than as detailed in Note 27 Contingent liabilities (2015: none).

f.  Commitments by Aura Energy Limited

Exploration expenditure commitments:

Exploration tenement minimum expenditure requirements

335,996

101,482

2016 
 $

2015 
$

Payable:

not later than 12 months

between 12 months and 5 years

greater than 5 years

The Group has no contracted exploration expenditure, however the Group has 
treatment core asset tenement renewals as expenditure the Group is committed to.

Operating lease commitments:

Operating leases contracted for or committed to but not capitalised in the financial 
statements

Payable:

not later than 12 months

between 12 months and 5 years

greater than 5 years

296,418

39,579

-

335,996

53,460

87,740

-

141,200

52,947

48,535

-

101,482

13,618

-

-

13,618

The Group shares premises with a number of companies. Balances stated represent the maximum gross amount payable, prior to 
reimbursement from other parties.

The amounts presented above are applicable for both Aura Energy Limited (the parent) and the Consolidated Group.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT)66

NOTE 27. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
On 15 October 2010, the Company and Global Coal Management plc entered into a Share Sale and Purchase Agreement which resulted in 
the Company acquiring all the shares on issue in GCM Africa Uranium, the entity which held the beneficial interest of GCM in the above-
mentioned research permits in Mauritania.

The Company paid GCM US$100,000 on execution of the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement; US$472,183 in cash plus 2,000,000 fully 
paid ordinary shares in the Company on completion (due diligence); and, US$500,000 on the first anniversary of completion.

The Company also agreed to pay a contingent consideration:

i.  US$2,000,000 (in cash and shares as determine by the Company) on the delineation of 75 million pounds or more Initial Resource 

(not defined in the Letter Agreement) under the Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore 
Reserves; and

ii.  US$400,000 in cash and 400,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the Company for each Subsequent Resource of 6,500,000 pounds up to 

a maximum of US$4,000,000 in cash and 4,000,000 in fully paid ordinary shares.

The obligations to make the contingent consideration payments are held by the Company and the contingent consideration is only 
payable if the Initial Resource and Subsequent Resource are achieved within 10 years of the date of the Share Sale and Purchase 
Agreement. Accordingly, the obligation to pay the contingent consideration expires on 15 October 2020.

There are no other contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2016.

NOTE 28. COMPANY DETAILS
The registered office and principal place of the Company is:

Address: 

Level 1, 34-36 Punt Road, Windsor Victoria 3181

Telephone: 

 +61 (0)3 9516 6500

Facsimile: 

 +61 (0)3 9516 6565

Website:  

 www.auraenergy.com.au

E-mail:  

 info@auraenergy.com.au

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16DirECtors' DECLArAtioN 67

DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION

The directors of the Company declare that:

1.   The financial statements and notes to the accounts are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and:

(a)  Comply with Accounting Standards.

(b)  Are in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting 

Standards Board, as stated in note 1 to the financial statements.

(c)  Give a true and fair view of the financial position as at 30 June 2016 and of the performance for the year ended 

on that date of the Company and Consolidated Group.

2.   The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Finance Officer have each declared that:

(a)  The financial records of the Company for the financial year have been properly maintained in accordance with 

s.286 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

(b)  The financial statements and notes for the financial year comply with the Accounting Standards.

(c)  The financial statements and notes for the financial year give a true and fair view.

3. 

In the directors’ opinion there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as  
and when they become due and payable.

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors pursuant to s.295(5) and is signed for and 
on behalf of the directors by:

Peter Reeve 
Chairman

Dated this Thursday 29 September 2016

 
68

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16DirECtors' DECLArAtioN 69

70

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

As of 27 SepTember 2016

The following additional information is required by the Australian Securities Exchange in respect of listed public companies.

a.  Distribution of Shareholders

CATEGORY (SIZE OF HOLDING)

1 – 10,000

10,001 – 100,000

100,001 – 1,000,000

1,000,001 – 1,000,000,000

TOTAL

b.  Unmarketable Parcels

Minimum $ 500.00 parcel at $ 0.0410 per unit

c.  Voting Rights

TOTAL HOLDERS

NUMBER
ORDINARY

% HELD OF ISSUED 
ORDINARY CAPITAL 

109

196

152

695

14,226

625,625

1,258,983

28,298,892

0.00

0.09

0.18

3.98

1,574

711,319,938

100.00

 MINIMUM  
PARCEL SIZE

12,196

 HOLDERS

 UNITS

498

 2,400,778

The voting rights attached to each class of equity security are as follows:

•  Ordinary shares: Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when a poll is called, otherwise each member present at a 

meeting or by proxy has one vote on a show of hands.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16ADDitioNAL iNForMAtioN 71

d.  20 Largest Shareholders — Ordinary Shares as at 27 September 2016. 

RANK

NAME

1.

FITEL NOMINEES LIMITED

UNITS

% OF UNITS

173,280,699

24.36

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

BNP PARIBAS NOMINEES PTY LTD 

HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED

PRE-EMPTIVE TRADING PTY LTD

HARGREAVES LANSDOWN (NOMINEES) LIMITED

CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED

SAMBOLD PTY LTD 

PASAGEAN PTY LIMITED

ABN AMRO CLEARING SYDNEY NOMINEES PTY LTD 

MR PETER DESMOND REEVE

BARCLAYSHARE NOMINEES LIMITED

GOLDMAN SACHS SECURITIES (NOMINEES) LIMITED

J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED

ONE MANAGED INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED 

MERRIWEE PTY LTD 

MR MICHAEL BUSHELL

MS MICHELLE ANNE PAINE

YARANDI INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 

MRS LINDA YE + MR DAVID XIAO DONG YE

"ONE MANAGED INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED 

63,064,268

60,285,060

35,650,000

14,687,245

13,918,654

13,764,895

12,180,612

11,843,258

9,718,304

8,855,430

8,750,000

7,656,040

7,376,875

6,750,000

5,474,903

3,750,000

3,750,000

3,568,800

3,530,919

8.87

8.48

5.01

2.06

1.96

1.94

1.71

1.66

1.37

1.24

1.23

1.08

1.04

0.95

0.77

0.53

0.53

0.50

0.50

Top 20 shareholders

Remaining shareholders

Total shares on issue

467,855,962

243,463,976

65.77

34.23

711,319,938

100.00

 
72

SHAREHOLDING AS AT 24 SEPTEMBER 2016 (CONT)

e.  20 Largest Option holders — as at 27 September 2016. 

RANK

NAME

UNITS

% OF UNITS

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

FIRST INVESTMENT PARTNERS PTY LTD

M & K KORKIDAS PTY LTD 

YARANDI INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 

PASAGEAN PTY LIMITED

BNP PARIBAS NOMINEES PTY LTD 

MR JONATHAN GREGORY QUINLIVAN

ALCARDO INVESTMENTS LIMITED 

MRS KERRYN PATRICIA DELEN

UBS NOMINEES PTY LTD

MR HENDRIK JACOBUS DELEN + MRS KERRYN PATRICIA DELEN 

MR LUKE KUKULJ

MR MARTIN MUSIC

MR NEIL FRANCIS STUART

MARTIN PLACE SECURITIES STAFF SUPERANNUATION FUND PTY LTD 

SPINNAKER INVESTMENT MANAGEMEN T PTY LTD

MAGNA EQUITIES II LLC

MR JOHN CHRISTOPHER BRIDGES + MS LEANNE BEVERLEY DONALD 

CRX INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED

MR ROBERT ANTHONY GENTILE + MRS MICHAELA MAREE GENTILE

MR KONSTANTINOS KORKIDAS

5,300,000

2,150,000

1,800,000

1,600,000

1,500,000

1,495,012

1,249,999

1,236,170

1,055,000

888,830

500,000

500,000

500,000

487,500

450,000

400,000

300,000

300,000

300,000

300,000

19.47

7.90

6.61

5.88

5.51

5.49

4.59

4.54

3.87

3.26

1.84

1.84

1.84

1.79

1.65

1.47

1.10

1.10

1.10

1.10

Top 20 listed option holders

Remaining listed option holders

Total listed options

22,312,511

4,913,655

81.95

18.05

27,226,166

100.00

COMPANY SECRETARY
The name of the Company Secretary is JM Madden. 

UNQUOTED SECURITIES 
Options over Unissued Shares

PRINCIPAL REGISTERED OFFICE
As disclosed in Note 28 Company Details of this Annual Report.

A total of 163,498,536 (2015: 86,159,005) unlisted options are 
on issue of which 35,000,000 (2015: 44,645,000) options are 
issued to directors as at 27 September 2016.

REGISTERS OF SECURITIES ARE HELD AT THE 
FOLLOWING ADDRESSES
As disclosed in the Corporate Directory of this Annual Report.

USE OF FUNDS
The Company has used its funds in accordance with its initial 
business objectives. 

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
Quotation has been granted for all the ordinary shares of the 
Company on all Member Exchanges of the Australian Securities 
Exchange Limited, as disclosed in the Corporate Directory of 
this Annual Report.

AURA ENERGY LIMITED:  ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 
TENEMENT REPORT

COUNTRY

Mauritania

TENEMENT
NUMBER

NAME

ORIGINAL
DATE OF GRANT

EXPIRY
DATE

SQ KMS HOLDER

561

563

564

961

1482

2002

2366

2479

Oum Ferkik

16-Apr-08

20-Nov-17

60 Aura Energy Limited

Oued El Foule Est

16-Apr-08

24-Mar-18

Ain Sder

16-Apr-08

09-Jun-18

313 Aura Energy Limited

330 Aura Energy Limited

Oued El Merre

09-Mar-10

(To be relinquished)

140 Aura Energy Limited

Oum Ferkik Sud

30-May-11

(Application)

476 Aura Energy Limited

Aguelet

Agouyame

Amare

08-May-13

(Application)

100 Aura Energy Limited

20-May-15

(Application)

34 Aura Energy Limited

21-Jun-16

(Application)

150 Aura Energy Limited

Sweden

2007:243

Haggan nr 1

28-Aug-07

28-Aug-17

18.3 Aura Energy Sweden AB

2007:244

Marby nr 1

30-Aug-07

30-Aug-17

22.4 Aura Energy Sweden AB

2009:23

Koborgsmyren nr 1

23-Jan-09

23-Jan-19

5.4 Aura Energy Sweden AB

2016:7

2016:9

Skallbole nr 1

20-Jan-16

20-Jan-19

7.8 Aura Energy Sweden AB

Mockelasen nr 1

21-Jan-16

21-Jan-19

17.6 Aura Energy Sweden AB

EQUITY
INTEREST

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

ACN: 115 927 681

ACN: 115 927 681

ANNUAL REPORT

30 JUNE 2016

ANNUAL REPORT

30 JUNE 2016