Barrick Gold Corporation
Annual Report 2013
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(In millions of US dollars, except per share data)
2013
2012
2011
(Based on IFRS)
Revenues
Net earnings (loss)
per share
Adjusted net earnings1
per share1
Operating cash flow
Adjusted operating cash flow1
Cash and equivalents
Dividends paid per share
Annualized dividend per share2
Gold production (000s oz)
Average realized gold price per ounce1
Adjusted operating costs per ounce1
All-in sustaining cash costs per ounce1
Copper production (Mlbs)
Average realized copper price per pound1
C1 cash costs per pound1
C3 fully allocated costs per pound1
1. Non-GAAP financial measure – see pages 60–69 of the 2013 Financial Report.
2. Calculation based on annualizing the last dividend paid in the respective year.
$ 12,511
(10,366 )
(10.14 )
2,569
2.51
4,239
4,359
2,404
0.50
0.20
7,166
1,407
566
915
539
3.39
1.92
2.42
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 14,394
(538 )
(0.54 )
3,954
3.95
5,983
5,700
2,097
0.75
0.80
7,421
1,669
563
1,014
468
3.57
2.05
2.85
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 14,236
4,484
4.49
4,666
4.67
5,315
5,680
2,749
0.51
0.60
7,676
1,578
463
821
451
3.82
1.71
2.30
$
$
$
$
$
$
Message from the Founder and Chairman
Message from the President and CEO
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Financial Statements
Notes to Financial Statements
2
6
13
75
80
Mineral Reserves and Resources
Corporate Governance and
Committees of the Board
Shareholder Information
Board of Directors and Executive Officers
149
157
158
160
Barrick is in a much better position than
“
it was a year ago after a transition that
began when we adopted our disciplined
capital allocation framework and a mantra
that has been emulated across the mining
industry: returns will drive production,
production will not drive returns. I believe
we have the right strategy in place and
we will not veer from it.”
Jamie C. Sokalsky
President and Chief Executive Officer
MESSAGE FROM THE FOUNDER AND CHAIRMAN
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
More than 30 years ago, when gold was
out of favor and its prospects were dim,
I saw an opportunity and started a gold
company. We went against conventional
wisdom then, and we have continued to
go our own way ever since.
Bankers and analysts saw gold as a commodity with
no future. We felt differently. We also disagreed
with the accepted wisdom that only miners
can run mining companies. Certainly, a mining
company needs top-notch miners to run its mining
operations, but a mine is also a business, particularly
if it’s a listed entity, and the skills needed to run
a business are different from those needed to
run a mine. Right from the beginning, we ran our
company with extraordinary executives with a good
business sense and put our mines in the hands
of experienced miners who were the best in their
field. Although we all worked closely together,
the business people didn’t interfere with the mine
operations, and the mine managers didn’t interfere
with the business strategy.
In this way, we became a unique entity that
blended entrepreneurial verve, unconventional
thinking, and operational excellence, with
everything united by a passionate commitment to
success. We implemented strategies that were either
new to mining or had previously been frowned
upon for no good reason. Traditionally, gold
companies had not gotten involved in hedging,
but we did, and before long we became the most
profitable gold company in the world – with the
share performance to match. Corporate social
responsibility was virtually unknown at the time,
but we reached out to our host communities and,
among other things, provided funds for thousands
of our miners’ children to go to college.
We had become very successful. We acquired
the Mercur mine from Texaco in 1983, and within
months doubled its production and halved its cash
costs. We bought Goldstrike in 1986 for what
most industry analysts thought was an exorbitant
price of $62 million – for just four drill-holes.
Today, that Nevada mine is one of the largest gold
mines in North America. It has produced more
than 40 million ounces, with no end in sight,
serving as an economic engine for the region. We
added mines outside North America and eventually
expanded our operations to five continents. We
acquired legendary companies such as Homestake
in the United States and Lac/Lakeshore and
Placer Dome in Canada, and, over time, we
became a legendary company in our own right
– a global Canadian mining champion that did
things differently.
And our success was reflected in our
share price. Barrick went public on the
“ We became a unique entity
that blended entrepreneurial
verve, unconventional thinking,
operational excellence and
a passionate commitment
to success.”
Peter Munk
Founder and
Chairman
2
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
Toronto Stock Exchange in May 1983 at $1.75 per
share. Within a decade, the stock had soared to $30.
However, this kind of explosive growth cannot
continue forever – and it didn’t for Barrick either.
Like all fast-growing companies, Barrick has
experienced peaks and troughs, and the year under
review, 2013, proved to be a most challenging
year for the company and a very disappointing one
for its shareholders. I would not have chosen this
particular year as my final one as Chairman, but I
don’t get to write the script.
Some of the setbacks were caused by factors
outside our control, while others were of our own
making. Few people anticipated the precipitous
decline in the price of gold last year; nevertheless,
as you know, gold’s run ended abruptly and
emphatically. Unfortunately, in our case this
coincided with a number of other significant
problems: after 25 years of bringing all our mines
into production on time and on budget, we
experienced huge cost overruns and associated
issues at our massive Pascua-Lama project on the
Argentinean-Chilean border; in addition, we were
forced to renegotiate our legally binding lease
agreement for our new Pueblo Viejo mine in the
Dominican Republic on much less favorable financial
terms. The cumulative impact of these setbacks,
exacerbated by the collapse in the price of gold, led
us to record $11.5 billion in writedowns in 2013.
It also compelled us to take the painful step of
lowering our dividend.
For the first time in our history, concerns were
expressed about the company’s debt levels and
liquidity. This was largely a result of the 2011 all-
cash acquisition of Equinox Minerals. In hindsight,
the purchase of this copper producer was poorly
timed and, to my regret, rather than following our
past strategy of using stock for the acquisition, we
paid in cash. Given the prevailing very low bond
yields at the time, we thought we were incurring
exceptionally low borrowing costs in buying Equinox
– preferable to dilution of our equity.
With all these challenges, our determined
and constant pursuit of growth – for decades
the accepted motto of our industry – suddenly
became unacceptable. Fortunately, we recognized
early that the business climate was fundamentally
changing. Investors were no longer interested only
in growth. Free cash flow, increased dividends, and
other shareholder-friendly moves became the new
priorities. In retrospect, this new mindset was not
surprising given that gold mining shares have for a
number of years lagged behind the price of gold.
While capital appreciation once compensated for
“ Barrick is a leaner and
stronger company with a
portfolio of mines unrivaled
in the industry.”
the lack of dividends in gold stocks, gold exchange
traded funds (ETFs), perceived as lower risk,
quickly became the preferred vehicle for many gold
investors, diverting capital away from gold equities.
Recognizing this shift, even before the
tumultuous events of 2013, we had begun a
complete overhaul of our business strategy. When
Jamie Sokalsky, our new CEO, was appointed in
mid-2012, he immediately shifted our focus from
production growth to maximizing free cash flow
and risk-adjusted returns. He prioritized the repair
of our balance sheet and arranged a successfully
underwritten US$3 billion equity issue, one of
the largest “bought deals” ever in Canada. As
part of this new approach, Jamie decided to mine
only the most profitable ounces and adopted a
highly disciplined capital allocation framework that
continues to underpin every decision we make,
including the difficult and painful decision to
suspend our Pascua-Lama project.
Almost every senior mining company in the
world has since followed our lead, which is a
testament to the vision of our management team
and our Board. Anyone can steer the ship in
calm waters, but it’s quite different to be at the
helm when the seas are stormy. Barrick’s Board
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
3
MESSAGE FROM THE FOUNDER AND CHAIRMAN
and management team are devoted, committed,
passionate, experienced, and exceptionally smart.
They’re the best in our business and more than
capable of navigating the company safely through
these turbulent times.
By moving decisively to re-evaluate every
aspect of our business, dramatically reduce capital
spending and overheads, and, in some cases,
suspend, close, or sell non-core assets, we secured
a significant head start in adapting to the lower
“ Investors have noticed the
changes at Barrick and they
can see the promise that
the future holds.”
gold price environment. But the change has not
been easy for our shareholders. Our dividend is
now substantially lower than it was a year ago,
and, because we used a conservative gold price
assumption at year end, our reserves declined
significantly for the first time in years. For me
personally, it has been excruciatingly painful to
see so much value – built over three decades
of continued growth, success, and operational
excellence – eroded in such a short period.
Yet, today, I feel totally confident about Barrick’s
future and our ability to restore the company’s full
value. Barrick is a leaner and stronger company with
a portfolio of mines unrivaled in the industry. It also
has a unique inventory of projects in the pipeline
and the lowest all-in sustaining costs of all senior
gold producers.
Investors have noticed the changes at Barrick
and they can see the promise that the future
holds. In the second half of 2013, Barrick’s stock
significantly outperformed our peer group and the
price of gold. That said, much work remains to be
done, but we believe we have taken the necessary
steps to protect against further downside risk and
have positioned ourselves well for the inevitable
recovery in metal prices.
This will be the last shareholder letter I write
as Chairman of Barrick. Heading into retirement,
I have felt a tremendous responsibility to find the
right person to replace me as Chairman, and so I am
delighted and relieved to know that John Thornton
is taking the helm of this great company.
John is more than up to the task: he brings an
unmatched combination of vision, business acumen
and experience, along with a stellar track record in
business and public affairs. During his remarkable
career he also has built up a network of global
contacts indispensable for a company like Barrick,
which can grow only by continuing to make large
investments around the world. Having spent time
at the head of China’s most prestigious business
school, John has developed deep and trusting
relationships with many of the top leaders in the
country. Today, China is not only a major driver of
demand for gold and other commodities but also a
potential source of capital.
As Founder of Barrick, I have long felt that,
when I retired, my main challenge and responsibility
would be to find the right person to replace me.
I am thankful and proud that we have someone of
John’s ability to commit his career and reputation to
our cause.
With John as Chairman and Jamie as CEO, I
believe we have an unmatched combination – two
exemplary leaders with complementary skills who
together are committed to transforming Barrick.
Seeing them at work over the past year and a half
has been immensely gratifying to me, an assurance
that we have emerged from the ordeal of 2013,
and the best reason to be enthusiastic about our
opportunities ahead.
As part of our renewal process, we also
nominated four new independent Directors to
be elected to our Board. Together, they bring
decades of experience and expertise that will provide
fresh perspectives and insights to an already
outstanding group.
I would also like to extend our gratitude to
Howard Beck and Brian Mulroney, both of whom
will step down from the Board at our upcoming
4
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
“ With John Thornton and
Jamie Sokalsky, I believe
we have an unmatched
combination – two exemplary
leaders who are committed
to transforming Barrick.”
Today, individuals such as Jamie Sokalsky, Kelvin
Dushnisky, Ammar Al-Joundi, and Jim Gowans,
who hold top positions at Barrick, mirror the
earlier generations of our leaders in their passion,
devotion, and commitment. This continuing
tradition of total commitment and professional
excellence makes me so confident that the years
ahead for Barrick are going to be as – or even
more – rewarding and exciting than the three
decades during which I was so proud to lead this
great company.
Peter Munk
Founder and Chairman
annual meeting. Howard joined the Board in
1984, just one year after Barrick was founded,
and right from the start he was an integral part
of our dynamic growth that turned a penny-
stock company into a global industry leader. Brian
became a Director in 1993, and, for two decades,
Barrick has benefited from his wisdom, impeccable
judgment and loyalty. His valuable advice and many
interventions on our behalf at levels of government
unavailable to us otherwise, were often critical to
our interests. I don’t know how we could have
accomplished what we did without these two men.
Accordingly, I can’t thank them enough for their
selfless commitment and service to Barrick – and to
our shareholders.
On behalf of the Board, I would also like to
extend my gratitude to Donald Carty and Robert
Franklin, both of whom left the Board in 2013.
They became Directors in 2006 in conjunction with
the Placer Dome acquisition, and each one made
valuable contributions to the company.
Lastly, looking back on what we have
accomplished over three decades, this is the
appropriate time to acknowledge the outstanding
contributions of some of the many colleagues
and partners I was fortunate to have in creating
Barrick. Barrick is their legacy as much as it is mine
and I recognize how fortunate I was to work with
prodigious talents, like Bob Smith, one of the best
mining engineers the gold industry has ever known.
I’m talking about the best of the best, world-
class miners and business visionaries upon whose
shoulders Barrick was built. Without individuals
like Bob, Bill Birchall, Brian Meikle, Greg Wilkins,
Belle Mulligan and Alan Hill – to name just a very
few of the top-class professionals who passionately
dedicated themselves to the company – Barrick
would never have become the largest gold producer
in the world and the Canadian icon that it is today.
As for myself, never in my dreams did I believe
when we founded Barrick back in 1983 that the
company would grow to become the giant it did.
But with a little luck, a lot of hard work, and many
outstanding colleagues over 30 years, we did.
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
5
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO
It was a difficult year for the gold
industry by any measure, and for Barrick
and its shareholders. The 28 percent
drop in the price of gold was the largest
decline since 1981, and had a dramatic
impact on our revenue and profitability
in 2013.
Weaker gold prices led to large impairment charges
in 2013. While we were disappointed to record these
charges, in the long run, I fully expect that our assets
will generate substantially more economic benefits for
our shareholders than current valuation levels imply.
Given the tough macroeconomic climate and the
serious challenges that we faced as a company last
year, it’s easy to lose sight of the significant strides
that we made. The reality is Barrick is a much stronger,
leaner and more agile company than it was 12 months
ago; a company well positioned to withstand a weaker
metal price environment and one that will thrive when
prices rebound, as they inevitably will.
This is the result of a transition that began
nearly two years ago, long before the price of gold
began its steep decline. We adopted a disciplined
capital allocation framework when I became CEO,
along with a mantra that has been emulated across
the mining industry: returns will drive production,
production will not drive returns. We recalibrated
our long-term production targets and determined
we would not build any new mines in the current
Jamie C. Sokalsky
President and
Chief Executive Officer
challenging environment. We began a company-
wide review to identify ways to reduce spending
and improve operational performance. We outlined
a road map to increase free cash flow, and said we
would address our high-cost operations by changing
mine plans, suspending or closing operations, or
divesting them to improve our portfolio.
And then we went out and executed our
plan, and in doing so, gave ourselves a significant
head start in adapting to the lower gold price
environment. To date, we have generated over
$1 billion from the sale of non-core assets, and
we have also announced the closure of one of our
smaller operations in South America. As a result,
our mine portfolio now stands at 19 compared to
27 at this time last year. This portfolio optimization
process is fundamental to our objective of focusing
on the right assets that can deliver long-term value
to our shareholders.
We reduced our 2013 capital expenditures and
costs by $2 billion, and we’re following through on
our pledge to change mine plans to focus on the
HIGH-QUALITY PORTFOLIO
CORTEZ
GOLDSTRIKE
5 mines in the Americas
contributed 55%
(4.0 million ounces) of our
total production in 2013.
Production
All-in Sustaining Costs
1,337 Koz
$433/oz
892 Koz
$901/oz
606 Koz
$627/oz
641 Koz
$833/oz
488 Koz
$735/oz
Gold Reserves/M&I Resources1
11.0 Moz/4.9 Moz
10.7 Moz/2.2 Moz
3.8 Moz/0.8 Moz
5.1 Moz/3.6 Moz
9.7 Moz/9.0 Moz
1. See pages 149–156 of the 2013 Financial Report for additional information on Barrick’s reserves and resources.
6
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
most profitable ounces. At our Bald Mountain mine
in Nevada, for instance, we decided not to spend in
excess of $500 million to develop additional open
pits because they do not generate a suitable risk-
adjusted return on invested capital. We maintain
the option to develop these pits in the future if gold
prices increase.
To successfully transform the business, we knew
there would be difficult decisions, and that was
certainly true in 2013. As metal prices plummeted
and uncertainty increased around our Pascua-Lama
project, it became clear that the economics of
the project were not sufficient to meet our return
thresholds. The decision to suspend the project was
one of the most difficult things I’ve had to do in my
career, but I am convinced it was the right decision.
No mine or project, no matter how significant to
the company, is exempt from our disciplined capital
allocation framework, and this includes Pascua-
Lama. A decision to restart construction will depend
on improved economics and better clarity on legal
and regulatory aspects. Meanwhile, the suspension
allowed us to further reduce our capital expenditure
guidance for 2014 by up to $1 billion.
While we firmly believe Pascua-Lama will be
completed and become one of the world’s best
gold mines, our existing portfolio is already the
best in the business. At $915 per ounce, our all-
in sustaining costs (AISC) were the lowest among
senior producers in 2013 and at the low end of our
forecasted range of $900–$975 per ounce. In fact,
2013 GOLD PERFORMANCE vs GUIDANCE
2013 COPPER PERFORMANCE vs GUIDANCE
LUMWANA PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS
Production
(Moz)
AISC 2 (US$/oz)
7.0 –
7.4
7.17
1,000 –
1,100
11%
900 –
975
915
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
l
a
u
t
c
A
0
400
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
400
Adjusted
Operating Costs2
(US$/oz)
7%
610 –
660 575 –
600
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
566
l
a
u
t
c
A
8%
520 –
550
539
2.60 –
5%
480 –
540
2.85 2.40 –
2.60
2.42
11%
2.10 –
2.30 1.90 –
2.00
1.92
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
400
1.0
1.0
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Production1 (Mlbs)
C3 Fully Allocated
C1 Cash Costs1
Production (Mlb)
C1 Costs ($/lb)
Costs1 (US$/lb)
(US$/lb)
New mine plan adopted
New leadership appointed
$4.00
$3.50
$3.00
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
2. Percentages calculated based on mid-point of guidance ranges.
1. Percentages calculated based on mid-point of guidance ranges.
Q4 – 12
Q1 – 13
Q2 – 13
Q3 – 13
we were able to reduce our AISC guidance twice
last year by a total of $100 per ounce due to our
unwavering focus on disciplined cost management.
Last year, our five largest mines – Cortez,
Goldstrike, Lagunas Norte, Veladero and Pueblo
Viejo – contributed more than half our production,
or approximately four million ounces, at an average
AISC of $668 per ounce. These mines are expected
to generate about 60 percent of our production in
2014 at an average AISC of $750–$800 per ounce.
It is no exaggeration to say that there are few mines
of this caliber anywhere in the world, and the
fact that we control all five reflects the underlying
strength of our portfolio.
Our Cortez mine in Nevada had another great
year with production of more than 1.3 million
ounces, much better than we ever anticipated.
2013 COPPER PERFORMANCE vs GUIDANCE
Production1 (Mlbs)
C3 Fully Allocated
C1 Cash Costs1
Costs1 (US$/lb)
(US$/lb)
5%
480 -
540
520 -
550
539
8%
2.60 -
2.85 2.40-
2.60
2.42
11%
2.10 -
2.30 1.90 -
2.00
1.92
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
400
1.0
1.0
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
1. Percentages calculated based on mid-point of guidance ranges.
LAGUNAS NORTE
VELADERO
PUEBLO VIEJO
Production
All-in Sustaining Costs
1,337 Koz
$433/oz
892 Koz
$901/oz
606 Koz
$627/oz
641 Koz
$833/oz
488 Koz
$735/oz
Gold Reserves/M&I Resources1
11.0 Moz/4.9 Moz
10.7 Moz/2.2 Moz
3.8 Moz/0.8 Moz
5.1 Moz/3.6 Moz
9.7 Moz/9.0 Moz
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
7
<< Original dashes from font are too small -- En dashes too long -- see horiz. scale above
<< Original ‘copper’ too close to gold
<< Bar titles in 57 cond. at 8 pt
LOWEST COST SENIOR PRODUCER
All-In Sustaining Costs ($/oz)
High quality portfolio
Industry Average
1,200 - 1,300
Senior Peers
Weighted Average
1,150 - 1,250
Successful cost
reduction and portfolio
optimization efforts
Barrick
900 - 975
400
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO
In fact, Barrick has a strong track record of
exceeding operating targets and producing more
ounces than originally expected. While production
at Cortez is expected to decline in 2014 to just
under one million ounces, primarily as a result of
planned waste stripping, the mine remains one of
the largest and most attractive gold assets in the
world, and is a cornerstone operation for Barrick. At
Goldstrike, which is also located in Nevada, we are
in the process of modifying the autoclaves to treat
“ Given the serious challenges
that we faced as a company
last year, it’s easy to lose
sight of the significant strides
that we made.”
about four million stockpiled ounces that would
have otherwise been processed at the end of the
mine life. This will allow us to accelerate cash flow,
and the project will contribute 350,000–450,000
ounces of annual production in the five-year period
beginning in 2015. Production is anticipated to
increase to above one million ounces in 2015 with a
full year of operations from the modified autoclaves.
Our Pueblo Viejo mine in the Dominican
Republic is expected to produce more ounces in
2014 at lower costs. Barrick’s 60 percent share of
Barrick’s Goldrush
project in Nevada was
the recipient of
PDAC’s prestigious
Thayer Lindsley award
for an international
mineral discovery.
A pre-feasibility study
is expected to be
completed by mid-2015.
this joint-venture operation was about 490,000
ounces last year and we expect that to increase to
600,000–700,000 ounces in 2014. At full capacity,
which we expect to reach in the first half of the
year, Pueblo Viejo will represent a significant
percentage of our total operating cash flow. It will
be a major contributor for many years to come.
Our exploration efforts continue to focus
heavily on Nevada, a mining-friendly jurisdiction
where we already own six mines and some of
the most prospective land positions in the world.
The centerpiece of our exploration program is our
Goldrush discovery near Cortez, which continues
to advance through prefeasibility. The original
resource has doubled twice since we announced the
discovery in 2011. Measured and indicated resources
at Goldrush increased by 1.6 million ounces to
10 million ounces at the end of 2013, while inferred
resources stood at 5.6 million ounces. Goldrush
is one of the highest grade giant greenfield gold
From left: Sybil Veenman (Senior Vice President
and General Counsel), Ammar Al-Joundi
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer),
Kelvin Dushnisky (Senior Executive Vice President),
Rick McCreary (Senior Vice President, Corporate
Development)
8
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
discoveries made worldwide since 2001, and
we expect it to bring an infusion of high quality
reserves in the future.
Barrick calculated its reserves for 2013 using
a conservative gold price assumption of $1,100
per ounce. While this is well below the company’s
outlook for the gold price and below current spot
prices, it reflects Barrick’s focus on producing
profitable ounces with a solid rate of return and the
ability to generate free cash flow. Gold reserves fell
to 104 million ounces at the end of 2013 from 140
million ounces in 2012. The majority of the decline
is a result of our decision to use a significantly lower
gold price. Some of the drop was due to depletion
and asset sales, and additionally, we chose to
remove a smaller percentage of our reserves that
were still profitable at $1,100 per ounce and met
the regulatory requirements to classify as reserves,
but did not meet our hurdle rates for return on
invested capital. This underscores just how serious
we are about our focus on increasing risk-adjusted
returns and free cash flow rather than production
at any cost. That doesn’t mean, however, that these
ounces won’t come back into reserves at higher
gold prices, and we are preserving the option to
mine them in the future everywhere we can. In fact,
excluding ounces processed and divested in 2013,
all of the ounces that were removed from reserves
were transferred into resources.
Adjusted
Operating Costs2
(US$/oz)
610 –
660 575 –
600
AISC 2 (US$/oz)
1,000 –
1,100
900 –
975
11%
7%
915
566
l
a
u
t
c
A
Along with the prudent capital allocation
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
decisions we made, we carried out a $3 billion
400
400
equity offering last fall. This was part of a broader
strategy to improve our capital structure and de-
lever the balance sheet. The proceeds allowed us
to eliminate $2.5 billion of debt repayments over
the next five years, providing us with a far greater
degree of financial flexibility. We now have just
$300 million of repayments over the next two years.
The spending cuts and other cost reductions that
we made more than offset the impact of the gold
price decline in 2013. Our improved balance sheet,
strong execution and more optimized mine portfolio
are resonating with investors.
At our Lumwana copper mine in Zambia, we
implemented a number of necessary and significant
changes, including a new mine plan that allowed us
to increase productivity and reduce costs. The
resulting turnaround at the mine was a key
2013 COPPER PERFORMANCE vs GUIDANCE
LUMWANA PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS
Production1 (Mlbs)
C3 Fully Allocated
Costs1 (US$/lb)
C1 Cash Costs1
(US$/lb)
Production (Mlb)
C1 Costs ($/lb)
5%
480 –
540
520 –
550
539
8%
2.60 –
2.85 2.40 –
2.60
2.42
11%
2.10 –
2.30 1.90 –
2.00
1.92
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
1.0
1.0
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
400
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
New mine plan adopted
New leadership appointed
$4.00
$3.50
$3.00
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
Production
(Moz)
7.17
7.0 –
7.4
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
O
0
2013 GOLD PERFORMANCE vs GUIDANCE
2. Percentages calculated based on mid-point of guidance ranges.
1. Percentages calculated based on mid-point of guidance ranges.
Q4 – 12
Q1 – 13
Q2 – 13
Q3 – 13
The dramatic operational turnaround at Lumwana
is a major accomplishment for the copper group.
The team assessed a number of options to improve
cash flow and ultimately implemented a new mine
plan which enabled the elimination of a large mining
contractor. Contractor costs were further reduced
by using in-house maintenance. Production has
increased and costs have declined substantially since
the first quarter of 2013.
2013 COPPER PERFORMANCE vs GUIDANCE
Production1 (Mlbs)
C3 Fully Allocated
Costs1 (US$/lb)
C1 Cash Costs1
(US$/lb)
5%
480 -
540
520 -
550
539
8%
2.60 -
2.85 2.40-
2.60
11%
2.10 -
2.30 1.90 -
2.00
l
i
a
n
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
1.92
l
a
u
t
c
A
2.42
l
a
u
t
c
A
l
i
a
n
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
l
a
u
t
c
A
400
1.0
l
i
a
n
g
i
r
O
d
e
s
i
v
e
R
1. Percentages calculated based on mid-point of guidance ranges.
1.0
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
<< Original dashes from font are too small -- En dashes too long -- see horiz. scale above
<< Original ‘copper’ too close to gold
<< Bar titles in 57 cond. at 8 pt
9
LOWEST COST SENIOR PRODUCER
All-In Sustaining Costs ($/oz)
High quality portfolio
Industry Average
1,200 - 1,300
Senior Peers
Weighted Average
1,150 - 1,250
Successful cost
reduction and portfolio
optimization efforts
Barrick
900 - 975
400
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO
“ Obtaining and maintaining
our license to operate is
an absolutely vital part of
our business.”
reason we were able to improve our 2013 copper
production guidance by five percent and reduce our
original cash cost guidance by more than 10 percent.
Our turnaround efforts extend to every aspect
of our business, including our corporate structure.
Last year, we introduced changes designed
to simplify roles and responsibilities, eliminate
management layers and bring senior leadership
closer to our mines. These changes will enable
us to focus on common objectives and provide
increased support for our employees at the mine
sites, which is where the money is really made for
shareholders. The transition to this new corporate
structure is nearly complete and will allow us to run
our operations with a clear focus on free cash flow
and rate of return, while ensuring we maintain our
license to operate.
Obtaining and maintaining our license to
operate is an absolutely vital part of our business.
To earn this right, we must build credibility and
trust in the communities where we operate by
fulfilling our social, economic and environmental
commitments so that our stakeholders feel vested
in our success. Living up to these commitments –
staying true to our values of integrity, responsibility
and accountability, ensuring a safe and secure
workplace, managing the environmental and social
impacts of our operations, and treating all people
with respect – is how we do business at Barrick.
Since becoming CEO, I have made it clear
that disciplined capital allocation will not come
at the expense of our commitment to corporate
responsibility. We will not cut costs that
jeopardize our ability to operate in a socially and
Since acquiring Pueblo
Viejo, Barrick has re-
vegetated 3,500 hectares
of land. Concurrent
reclamation uses
biodegradable coconut
fiber mats from a local
women’s cooperative to
control soil erosion.
environmentally responsible manner. This is critical
to achieving our business goals and creating value
for our shareholders and our host communities and
countries. Barrick invests in every community where
it operates because we have a direct stake
in the success and stability of these communities,
and because we see our role as a partner in
sustainable development. As I indicated in my letter
to you last year, maintaining and strengthening
From left: Darian Rich (Senior Vice President,
Human Resources), Rob Krcmarov (Senior Vice President,
Global Exploration), Ivan Mullany (Senior Vice President,
Capital Projects), Jim Gowans (Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer)
10
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013
The safety of our people
remains a cornerstone
priority. Barrick’s emer-
gency response teams
are workforce volunteers
who ensure our sites
maintain a high degree
of preparedness.
focus on our costs and disciplined financial targets,
like return on invested capital, that will allow us
to make money in any gold price environment.
We are now better protected against further price
downside and more strongly positioned for the
upside. And while our focus on profitability has
led to lower production in 2014, that production
will come from a stronger base, with all-in
sustaining costs that are the lowest of the
senior producers.
This is the right strategy and we will not veer
from it. We will continue to build on what we
accomplished in 2013 and we will be relentless in
our goal of maximizing shareholder returns.
Jamie C. Sokalsky
President and Chief Executive Officer
our commitment to corporate responsibility is a
critical component of our strategy and one of my
personal commitments as CEO. It is shared by our
entire management team, and by our Founder,
Peter Munk.
As you know, Peter is retiring as Chairman at
our 2014 annual meeting. I joined Barrick more than
20 years ago and, during that time, he has served
as a mentor, motivator and measuring stick of what
a great executive should be. His passion, wisdom,
courage and determination transformed Barrick
from an unknown junior mining company into the
world’s leading gold producer, an iconic Canadian
company infused with his vision and values. While
Peter may no longer serve on the Board, Barrick
will always be able to draw on his wisdom and
knowledge when needed, as we work to deliver the
returns that shareholders expect.
No one can replace Peter, but we are fortunate
to have John Thornton to carry the torch. John has
an outstanding track record in business and a global
network of contacts that will be invaluable to us,
and I have no doubt that he will help Barrick make
the right strategic choices in these challenging times.
In conclusion, I would like to express my
gratitude to our entire Board of Directors for placing
their faith in me as CEO of this great company.
I would also like to recognize our employees who
rose to the challenge and turned our disciplined
capital allocation framework into a successful
reality. We can’t control the gold price, but we can
Barrick’s water treatment plant at the Pueblo Viejo
mine has led to a vast reduction in the acidity of the
nearby Margajita River. Prior to Barrick’s acquisition,
the river was highly acidic due to untreated acid rock
drainage from a previous mining operation at the site.
Pictured, community residents collect water samples
from the river, which are analyzed at an independent
laboratory. Twenty communities currently participate
in the water monitoring program.
Barrick Gold Corporation | Annual Report 2013 11
Financial Report
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Financial Statements
Notes to Financial Statements
Mineral Reserves and Resources
Corporate Governance and Committees of the Board
Shareholder Information
Board of Directors and Executive Officers
13
75
80
149
157
158
160
Management’s Discussion
and Analysis (“MD&A”)
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is
intended to help the reader understand Barrick Gold
Corporation (“Barrick”, “we”, “our” or the “Company”),
our operations, financial performance and present and
future business environment. This MD&A, which has
been prepared as of February 12, 2014, should be read
in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts are presented
in US dollars.
For the purposes of preparing our MD&A, we
consider the materiality of information. Information is
considered material if: (i) such information results in, or
would reasonably be expected to result in, a significant
change in the market price or value of our shares; or
(ii) there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable
investor would consider it important in making an
investment decision; or (iii) it would significantly alter
the total mix of information available to investors.
We evaluate materiality with reference to all relevant
circumstances, including potential market sensitivity.
Continuous disclosure materials, including our
most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form, annual
MD&A, audited consolidated financial statements,
and Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and
Proxy Circular will be available on our website at
www.barrick.com, on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and
on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. For an explanation of
terminology unique to the mining industry, readers
should refer to the glossary on page 70.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information
Certain information contained or incorporated by
reference in this MD&A, including any information as to
our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or
operating performance constitutes “forward-looking
statements”. All statements, other than statements of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The
words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “contemplate”,
“target”, “plan”, “intend”, “continue”, “budget”,
“estimate”, “may”, “will”, “schedule” and similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon
a number of estimates and assumptions that, while
considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently
subject to significant business, economic and competitive
uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown
factors could cause actual results to differ materially from
those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such
factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the
spot and forward price of gold and copper or certain
other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel and
electricity); changes in national and local government
legislation, taxation, controls, regulations, expropriation
or nationalization of property and political or economic
developments in Canada, the United States and other
jurisdictions in which the Company does or may carry on
business in the future; diminishing quantities or grades
of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and
technical challenges associated with the construction of
capital projects; the impact of global liquidity and credit
availability on the timing of cash flows and the values
of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash
flows; adverse changes in our credit rating; the impact of
inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; operating
or technical difficulties in connection with mining or
development activities; the speculative nature of mineral
exploration and development, including the risks of
obtaining necessary licenses and permits; contests over
title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped
properties; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism,
sabotage and civil disturbances; changes in U.S. dollar
13
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative
instruments; litigation; business opportunities that may
be presented to, or pursued by, the Company; our ability
to successfully integrate acquisitions or complete
divestitures; employee relations; availability and increased
costs associated with mining inputs and labor; and the
organization of our African gold operations and
properties under a separate listed company. In addition,
there are risks and hazards associated with the business
of mineral exploration, development and mining,
including environmental hazards, industrial accidents,
unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins,
flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold/
copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate
insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these
risks). Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can
affect our actual results and could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied in any
forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us.
Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. All of the
forward-looking statements made in this MD&A are
qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific
reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual
Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian
provincial securities regulatory authorities for a discussion
of some of the factors underlying forward-looking
statements. We disclaim any intention or obligation to
update or revise any forward-looking statements
whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Changes in Presentation of Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
We use certain non-GAAP financial performance
measures in our MD&A. These measures are intended to
provide additional information only and do not have any
standardized meaning prescribed by International
Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and should not be
considered in isolation or as substitutes for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other
companies may calculate these measures differently.
For a detailed description of each of the non-GAAP
measures used in this MD&A, please see the discussion
under “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”
beginning on page 60 of our MD&A. In 2013, we added
or made changes to the following non-GAAP
performance measures:
Adjusted operating costs per ounce, All-in sustaining
cash costs per ounce and All-in costs per ounce
Beginning with our 2012 Annual Report, we adopted a
non-GAAP “all-in sustaining costs per ounce” measure.
This was based on the expectation that the World Gold
Council (“WGC”) (a market development organization
for the gold industry comprised of and funded by
18 gold mining companies from around the world,
including Barrick) was developing a similar metric and
that investors and industry analysts were interested in
a measure that better represented the total recurring
costs associated with producing gold. The WGC is not
a regulatory organization. In June 2013, the WGC
published its definition of “adjusted operating costs”,
“all-in sustaining costs” and also a definition of
14
“all-in costs.” Barrick voluntarily adopted the definition
of these metrics starting with our second quarter
2013 MD&A.
The “all-in sustaining costs” measure is similar to
our presentation in reports prior to second quarter 2013,
with the exception of the classification of sustaining
capital. In our previous calculation, certain capital
expenditures were presented as mine expansion projects,
whereas they meet the definition of sustaining capital
expenditures under the WGC definition, and therefore
these expenditures have been reclassified as sustaining
capital expenditures.
Our “all-in costs” measure starts with “all-in
sustaining costs” and adds additional costs which reflect
the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle
of a mine, including: non-sustaining capital expenditures
(capital expenditures at new projects and capital
expenditures at existing operations related to projects
that significantly increase the net present value of the
mine and are not related to current production) and
other non-sustaining costs (primarily exploration and
evaluation (“E&E”) costs, community relations costs and
general and administrative costs that are not associated
with current operations). This definition recognizes that
there are different costs associated with the life-cycle of
a mine, and that it is therefore appropriate to distinguish
between sustaining and non-sustaining costs.
We believe that our use of “all-in sustaining costs”
and “all-in costs” will assist analysts, investors and other
stakeholders of Barrick in understanding the costs
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS associated with producing gold, understanding the
economics of gold mining, assessing our operating
performance and also our ability to generate free cash
flow from current operations and to generate free cash
flow on an overall Company basis. Due to the capital
intensive nature of the industry and the long useful lives
over which these items are depreciated, there can be a
significant timing difference between net earnings
calculated in accordance with IFRS and the amount of
free cash flow that is being generated by a mine. In the
current market environment for gold mining equities,
many investors and analysts are more focused on the
ability of gold mining companies to generate free cash
flow from current operations, and consequently we
believe these measures are useful non-GAAP operating
metrics and supplement our IFRS disclosures. These
measures are not representative of all of our cash
expenditures as they do not include income tax
payments, interest costs or dividend payments. These
measures do not include depreciation or amortization.
“All-in sustaining costs” and “all-in costs” are intended
to provide additional information only and do not have
standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. These
measures are not equivalent to net income or cash flow
from operations as determined under IFRS. Although the
WGC has published a standardized definition, other
companies may calculate these measures differently.
Starting in our second quarter 2013 MD&A, the
non-GAAP measure “total cash costs” was renamed
“adjusted operating costs” in order to conform with the
WGC definition of the comparable measure. The manner
in which this measure is calculated has not been changed.
Beginning in our second quarter 2013 MD&A, in
addition to presenting these metrics on a by-product
basis, we have calculated these metrics on a co-product
basis. Our co-product metrics remove the impact of other
metal sales that are produced as a by-product of our
gold production from cost per ounce calculations, but
does not reflect a reduction in costs for costs associated
with other metal sales.
The table on page 64 reconciles these non-GAAP
measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures
and previous periods have been recalculated to conform
to our current definition. We have also included as
references additional information as to how each of the
adjustments to cost of sales have been calculated.
Index
16 Overview
Enterprise Risk
16 Our Business and Strategy
17
18 Review of 2013 Results
20 Key Business Developments
22 Outlook for 2014
28 Market Overview
33 Review of Annual Financial Results
Production Costs
Exploration and Evaluation
33 Revenue
34
34 General & Administrative Expenses
34 Other Expense (Income)
35
35 Capital Expenditures
35
36
36
37 Review of Operating Segments Performance
Finance Cost/Finance Income
Impairment Losses
Income Tax
45 Financial Condition Review
Shareholders’ Equity
45 Balance Sheet Review
45
45 Comprehensive Income
46
49
49 Commitments and Contingencies
Financial Position and Liquidity
Financial Instruments
50
Internal Control over Financial Reporting and
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
51 Review of Quarterly Results
52
IFRS Critical Accounting Policies and
Accounting Estimates
60 Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
70 Glossary of Technical Terms
15
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
Our Business and Strategy
Our Business
We have operating mines or projects in Canada, the
United States, the Dominican Republic, Australia, Papua
New Guinea, Peru, Chile, Argentina, Zambia, Saudi
Arabia and Tanzania. We sell our production in the world
market through the following distribution channels: gold
bullion is sold in the gold spot market; gold and copper
concentrate is sold to independent smelting companies;
and copper cathode is sold to various manufacturers
and traders.
At the end of 2013, we made a change to our
organization structure, moving from a Regional Business
Unit model to an Operating Unit model. Each Operating
Unit will be accountable for managing our core mining
business, either at one of our larger mines or within a
grouping of mines based on geography and/or the
primary metal produced, with a focus on generating free
cash flow and maintaining our license to operate by
operating in a safe, responsible manner and meeting our
environmental obligations and corporate responsibility
commitments. Under the new structure, our core
operating sites will have a direct reporting line to the
Chief Operating Officer, which will increase direct
accountability and allow for greater visibility into our
most important assets.
The gold Operating Units are: Cortez, Goldstrike,
Pueblo Viejo, Lagunas Norte, Veladero, North America –
Other and Australia Pacific. We also hold a 73.9% equity
interest in African Barrick Gold plc (“ABG”), a publicly
traded company, which includes our previously held
African gold mines and exploration properties. In addition,
our Pascua-Lama project is also an Operating Unit.
Our Global Copper unit manages our copper
business with a view towards maximizing the value of
our copper assets. The Global Copper unit manages the
Zaldívar and Lumwana mines and Jabal Sayid project.
We believe the new operating unit structure will
enable us to act quickly in response to opportunities or
market developments while maintaining our focus on
license to operate matters and compliance, and allow us
to maintain our disciplined capital allocation framework in
order to maximize the free cash flow from our operations.
Our Strategy
Our actions are driven by our core values reflecting the
guiding principles used to run the Company and these
values provide the foundation for our strategy. Our core
values are:
n Integrity
n Respect and open communication
n Responsibility and accountability
n Teamwork
n Create shareholder value
We are focused on maximizing shareholder value
through our commitment to a disciplined capital
allocation framework to guide our decision making.
Under this approach, all capital allocation options, which
include organic investment in exploration and projects,
and acquisitions or divestitures to improve the quality of
our portfolio, will be assessed on the basis of maximizing
risk-adjusted returns. Our emphasis on free cash flow
should position the Company, in the future, with the
potential to return more capital to shareholders, repay
debt, and make additional attractive return investments
to upgrade our portfolio. We will seek to optimize the
overall returns from our portfolio of assets and projects.
Consequently, existing assets that do not generate target
returns or long-term free cash flow will be deferred,
suspended or divested to improve the overall quality of
our portfolio. Our strategy and approach to capital
allocation has been summed up as follows:
RETURNS WILL DRIVE PRODUCTION;
PRODUCTION WILL NOT DRIVE RETURNS.
16
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Enterprise Risk
Risk is an inherent component of our business.
Therefore, effective enterprise risk management (“ERM”)
is required to support our Company vision and the
successful delivery of strategic objectives. Our ERM
model is focused on top-level business risks and provides
a framework to:
n Identify, assess and communicate inherent and
residual risk;
n Embed ERM responsibilities into the operating model;
n Integrate risk responses into strategic priorities and
business plans; and
n Provide assurance to the senior leadership team
(“SLT”) and relevant Committees to the Board of
Directors on the effectiveness of control activities.
Our business is subject to risks in financial, regulatory,
strategic and operational areas. In managing risk,
management focuses on the risk factors that impact our
ability to operate in a safe, profitable and responsible
manner, including:
Financial and regulatory risk factors
n fluctuations in the spot and forward prices of gold,
copper and silver;
n the impact of global financial conditions such as
inflation, fluctuations in the currency markets and
changes in U.S. dollar interest rates;
n our liquidity profile, level of indebtedness and
credit ratings;
n changes in governments or the intervention of
governments, or other political or economic
developments in the jurisdictions in which we do
or may carry on business in the future;
n changing or increasing regulatory requirements,
including increasing royalties and taxes, and our ability
to obtain and to maintain compliance with permits
and licenses necessary to operate in our industry;
n our ability to maintain appropriate internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure;
n our ability to maintain compliance with anti-corruption
standards;
n our reliance on models and plans that are based on
estimates, including mineral reserves and resources; and,
n the organization of our African gold operations and
properties under a separate listed company.
Strategic and operating risk factors
n diminishing quantities or declining grades of reserves
and our ability to replace mineral reserves and
resources through discovery or acquisition;
n our ability to integrate acquisitions or complete
divestitures;
n our ability to operate within joint ventures;
n our ability to compete for mining properties, to
obtain and maintain valid title and to obtain and
maintain access to required land, water and
power infrastructure;
n our ability to execute development and capital projects,
including managing scope, costs and timelines
associated with construction, to successfully deliver
expected operating and financial performance;
n availability and increased cost of mining inputs, critical
parts and equipment, and certain commodities,
including fuel and electricity;
n sequencing or processing challenges resulting in lower
than expected recovery rates;
n technical complexity in connection with mining or
expansion activities;
n unusual or unexpected ore body formations,
ore dilution, varying metallurgical and other ore
characteristics;
n business interruption or loss due to acts of terrorism,
intrusion, sabotage, work stoppage and civil
disturbances;
n loss due to theft of gold bullion, copper cathode
or gold/copper concentrate;
n permit or regulatory breaches resulting in fines,
temporary shut-down or suspension of operations,
or litigation;
n our ability to manage security and human rights
matters;
n relationships with the communities in which
we operate;
n employee and labor relations; and,
n availability and increased costs associated with labor.
In addition, there are hazards associated with the
business of mineral exploration, development and mining,
including environmental incidents, industrial accidents,
and natural phenomena such as inclement weather
conditions, flooding and earthquakes or cave-ins (and
the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain
insurance, to cover these risks) that could result in
unexpected negative impacts to future cash flows.
We have provided a description of our approach to
managing our top-level business risks throughout this
MD&A. For a more fulsome discussion of risks relevant to
investors, see “Risk Factors” in our most recent Form
40-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and
Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities.
17
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Review of 2013 Results
2013 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Results
($ millions, except where indicated)
Financial Data
Revenue
Net earnings (loss)2
Per share (“EPS”)3
Adjusted net earnings4
Per share (“adjusted EPS”)3,4
Total project capital expenditures5
Total capital expenditures – expansion5
Total capital expenditures – sustaining5
Operating cash flow
Adjusted operating cash flow4
Free cash flow4
Adjusted return on equity4
Operating Data
Gold
Gold produced (000s ounces)6
Gold sold (000s ounces)6
Realized price ($ per ounce)4
Adjusted operating costs ($ per ounce)4
Adjusted operating costs on a co-product basis ($ per ounce)4
All-in sustaining costs ($ per ounce)4
All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($ per ounce)4
All-in costs ($ per ounce)4
All-in costs on a co-product basis ($ per ounce)4
Copper
Copper produced (millions of pounds)
Copper sold (millions of pounds)
Realized price ($ per pound)4
C1 cash costs ($ per pound)4
For the three months ended
December 31
For the years ended
December 31
2013
20121
2013
20121
$ 2,926
(2,830)
(2.61)
406
0.37
658
122
568
1,016
1,085
$ (280)
12%
1,713
1,829
$ 1,272
$ 573
$ 592
$ 899
$ 918
$ 1,317
$ 1,336
139
134
$ 3.34
$ 1.81
$ 4,149
(3,013)
(3.01)
1,157
1.16
878
82
1,038
1,845
1,925
$ (114)
20%
2,019
2,027
$ 1,714
$ 547
$ 564
$ 1,048
$ 1,065
$ 1,433
$ 1,450
130
154
$ 3.54
$ 1.93
$ 12,511
(10,366)
(10.14)
2,569
2.51
2,434
468
2,472
4,239
4,359
$ (1,142)
14%
7,166
7,174
$ 1,407
566
$
589
$
915
$
938
$
$ 1,282
$ 1,305
539
519
$ 3.39
$ 1.92
$ 14,394
(538)
(0.54)
3,954
3.95
3,433
208
3,354
5,983
5,700
$ (1,073)
17%
7,421
7,292
$ 1,669
563
$
$
580
$ 1,014
$ 1,031
$ 1,404
$ 1,421
468
472
$ 3.57
$ 2.05
1. Figures are restated for new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
2. Net earnings (loss) represent net income attributable to the equity holders of the Company.
3. Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method.
4. These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see
pages 60–69 of this MD&A.
5. These amounts are presented on a 100% accrued basis. Project and expansion capital expenditures are included in our calculation of all-in costs, but not included
in our calculation of all-in sustaining costs.
6. Production includes our equity share of gold production at Highland Gold up to April 26, 2012, the effective date of our sale of Highland Gold. Production also
includes African Barrick Gold (“ABG”) on a 73.9% basis and Pueblo Viejo on a 60% basis, both of which reflect our equity share of production. Sales include
our equity share of gold sales from ABG and Pueblo Viejo.
18
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Full Year Financial Highlights:
During 2013, gold prices averaged $1,411 per ounce,
compared to $1,669 in 2012 and were volatile, falling
from a high of $1,696 per ounce in January to a low of
$1,181 per ounce in June. In response to the substantial
decline in gold prices, we responded with significant cuts
in operating costs and capital expenditures to improve
cash flow without affecting our near-term production
targets. During the year, we produced 7.17 million
ounces at adjusted operating costs of $566 per ounce
and all-in sustaining costs of $915 per ounce, which were
substantially lower than our original guidance ranges of
$610 to $660 per ounce and $1,000 to $1,100 per
ounce, respectively. Capital expenditures were $5.0 billion
in 2013, down from our original guidance range of
$5.7 to $6.3 billion. We also began executing a portfolio
optimization plan to divest non-core assets and develop
new mine plans at our mines to improve near-term cash
flow while preserving optionality for future production.
The lower gold price was a significant contributor to our
recognizing impairment losses of $11.5 billion (net of tax
and non-controlling interest effects) ($12.7 billion pre-tax)
and also our decision to temporarily suspend construction
activities at Pascua-Lama. This suspension decision will
postpone and reduce near-term cash outlays. In third
quarter 2013, we reached an agreement to amend the
terms of our Special Lease Agreement for Pueblo Viejo,
which will result in additional and accelerated tax
revenues to the government of the Dominican Republic,
and as a result, we recognized an additional $249 million
in income tax expense. Other key financial and
operational highlights included:
n Net loss for 2013 was $10.4 billion (-$10.14 per share)
compared to a net loss of $0.5 billion (-$0.54 per
share) in the same prior year period. Adjusted net
earnings for 2013 were $2.6 billion ($2.51 per share)
compared to adjusted net earnings of $4.0 billion
($3.95 per share) in the same prior year period.
n Gold production for 2013 was 7.17 million ounces
at adjusted operating costs of $566 per ounce, all-in
sustaining costs of $915 per ounce and all-in costs
of $1,282 per ounce, compared to production of
7.42 million ounces at adjusted operating costs of
$563 per ounce, all-in sustaining costs of $1,014 per
ounce and all-in costs of $1,404 per ounce in 2012.
n Realized gold prices in 2013 were $1,407 per ounce,
compared to $1,669 in 2012.
n Copper production for 2013 was 539 million pounds
at C1 cash costs of $1.92 per pound, compared to
production of 468 million pounds at C1 cash costs of
$2.05 per pound in 2012.
n Operating cash flow was $4.2 billion, compared to
operating cash flow of $6.0 billion for 2012.
n Capital expenditures, down $1.6 billion, or 23%, over
the prior year.
n Termed out $3.0 billion of debt in April 2013 and
completed a $3.0 bought equity deal in November
2013, which was primarily used to repay debt.
n Completed or announced divestitures of Barrick
Energy and six non-core, high-cost mines for total
expected consideration of about $940 million,
including cash proceeds of about $720 million.
FACTORS AFFECTING ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS
3,954
i
s
g
n
n
r
a
e
t
e
n
j
d
e
t
s
u
d
A
2
1
0
2
678
151
113
36
1,880
483
2,569
&
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
x
E
l
s
t
s
o
c
n
o
i
t
a
u
a
v
e
l
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
&
l
a
r
e
n
e
G
s
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
e
v
i
t
a
r
t
s
i
n
m
d
a
i
r
e
h
t
O
e
c
i
r
p
d
e
z
i
l
a
e
r
d
o
G
l
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I
i
s
g
n
n
r
a
e
t
e
n
j
d
e
t
s
u
d
A
3
1
0
2
FACTORS AFFECTING ADJUSTED OPERATING CASH FLOW
419
354
326
5000
5,700
4000
3000
1,880
544
16
4,359
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
c
j
2000
d
e
t
s
u
1000
d
A
2
1
0
2
g
n
i
0
t
a
r
e
p
O
r
e
h
t
o
n
i
e
g
n
a
h
C
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
&
s
t
e
s
s
a
i
d
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
l
a
u
r
c
c
a
&
P
/
A
n
i
e
g
n
a
h
C
e
c
i
r
p
d
e
z
i
l
a
e
r
l
d
o
G
r
e
h
t
O
i
d
a
p
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I
j
d
e
t
s
u
d
A
3
1
0
2
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
c
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
O
19
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Key Business Developments
Disciplined capital allocation framework decisions
Equity Issuance and Debt Repurchase
In November 2013, we completed a bought deal equity
offering of 163.5 million common shares at a price
of $18.35 per common share for net proceeds of
approximately $2.9 billion. We used the net proceeds
of the offering to strengthen our balance sheet and
improve our long-term liquidity position by using
approximately $2.6 billion of the net proceeds to redeem
or repurchase outstanding short- and medium-term debt.
Divestitures
On September 30, 2013, we completed the sale of our
Yilgarn South assets, which are the Granny Smith, Lawlers
and Darlot mines, for total proceeds of $266 million,
consisting of $135 million in cash and $131 million in
Gold Fields Limited shares. As a result of this sale, we
recognized a post-tax gain of $3 million ($11 million
pre-tax), in third quarter 2013.
On January 31, 2014, we completed the sale of our
Plutonic mine for total cash consideration of A$25 million.
As at December 31, 2013, the assets and liabilities of
Plutonic were written down to their realizable value,
resulting in a post-tax loss of $12 million ($17 million
pre-tax) and have been presented as held for sale on
the consolidated balance sheet.
On January 22, 2014, we announced we had agreed
to divest our Kanowna mine for total cash consideration
of A$75 million, subject to certain closing adjustments.
The transaction is expected to close in March 2014.
Based on the expected proceeds of this transaction, we
have reversed $66 million of impairment losses that we
had recorded against Kanowna in second quarter 2013.
As at December 31, 2013, the assets and liabilities of
Kanowna have been presented as held for sale on the
consolidated balance sheet.
On February 4, 2014, we announced we had agreed
to divest our minority interest in the Marigold mine for
total cash consideration of $86 million, subject to certain
closing adjustments. The transaction is expected to close
in April 2014. As at December 31, 2013, the assets and
liabilities of Marigold were written down to their estimated
realizable value, resulting in a post-tax loss of $39 million
($60 million pre-tax) and have been presented as held for
sale on the consolidated balance sheet.
20
In July 2013, we completed the sale of our oil & gas
business segment for consideration of $435 million,
consisting of $387 million in cash and a future royalty
valued at $48 million. As a result of the sale, we
recognized a post-tax loss of $466 million ($519 million
pre-tax), including $90 million related to goodwill, in
2013, representing the difference between the net
proceeds and our carrying value.
Closure of Pierina
As of August 2013, we decided to initiate closure of
our Pierina mine in Peru. Primarily as a result of the
accelerated closure, we recorded a $134 million increase
to our provision for rehabilitation through the income
statement in 2013.
Pascua-Lama
During the fourth quarter of 2013, Barrick announced
the temporary suspension of construction at its Pascua-
Lama project, except for those activities required for
environmental and regulatory compliance. The ramp-
down is on schedule for completion by mid-2014. The
company expects to incur costs of about $300 million1
this year for the ramp-down and environmental and
social obligations. A decision to restart development will
depend on improved economics and reduced uncertainty
related to legal and regulatory requirements. Remaining
development will take place in distinct stages with
specific work programs and budgets. This approach will
facilitate more efficient planning and execution and
improved cost control. In the interim, Barrick will explore
opportunities to improve the project’s risk-adjusted
returns, including strategic partnerships or royalty and
other income streaming agreements. The company will
preserve the option to resume development of this asset,
which has a mine life of 25 years.
Pueblo Viejo
In third quarter 2013, Pueblo Viejo Dominicana
Corporation (“PVDC”), our joint arrangement with
Goldcorp Inc., reached an agreement with the
Government of the Dominican Republic concerning
amendments to the Pueblo Viejo SLA. The key terms of
the amendments include:
n Elimination of a 10 percent return embedded in the
initial capital investment for the purposes of the net
profits interest (“NPI”) calculation;
1. About 25%, related to water management systems and completion of
minor scopes of work in Argentina and Chile, is expected to be capitalized.
Actual expenditures will be dependent on a number of factors, including
environmental and regulatory requirements.
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS n An extension to the period over which PVDC may
recover its capital investment;
n A delay of application of NPI deductions;
n A reduction in tax depreciation rates; and
n A graduated minimum tax was established.
The graduated tax rate will be adjusted up or down
based on future metal prices. The agreement also
includes the following broad parameters consistent with
the previous terms of the SLA:
n Corporate income tax rate of 25 percent
n Net smelter royalty (“NSR”) of 3.2 percent
n NPI of 28.75 percent.
Gold Reserves and Mineral Resources update2
Barrick calculated its reserves for 2013 using a gold
price assumption of $1,100 per ounce, compared to
$1,500 per ounce in 2012. While this is well below
the company’s outlook for the gold price (and below
current spot prices), it reflects Barrick’s focus on
producing profitable ounces with a solid rate of return
and the ability to generate free cash flow. Gold reserves
declined to 104.1 million ounces at the end of 2013
from 140.2 million ounces at the end of 2012. Excluding
ounces mined and processed in 2013 and divestitures,
all of these ounces have transferred to resources,
preserving the option to access them in the future at
higher gold prices.
The 26% decline in reserves breaks down as
following (approximations):
n 13% – lower gold price assumption of $1,100
per ounce
n 6% – ounces mined and processed in 2013
n 4% – ounces that are economic at $1,100 per
ounce, but do not meet hurdle rates of return on
invested capital
n 2% – ounces no longer economic due to increased costs
n 2% – divestitures of non-core, high-cost mines as part
of the company’s portfolio optimization strategy
n (1)% – additions
Measured and indicated gold resources increased to
99.4 million ounces at the end of 2013 from 83.0 million
ounces at the end of 2012. Resources were calculated
based on a gold price assumption of $1,500 per ounce
compared to $1,650 per ounce for 2012. Inferred gold
resources decreased to 31.9 million ounces at the end of
2013 from 35.6 million ounces at the end of 2012.
Replacing gold reserves depleted by production year
over year is necessary in order to maintain production
over the long term. If depletion of reserves exceeds
discoveries over the long term, then we may not be able
to sustain gold production levels. Reserves can be
replaced by expanding known ore bodies, acquiring
mines or properties or discovering new deposits. Once a
site with gold mineralization is discovered, it takes many
years from the initial phases of drilling until production is
possible, during which time the economic feasibility of
production may change. Substantial expenditures are
required to establish proven and probable reserves and
to permit and construct mining and processing facilities.
Corporate governance and management update
In December 2013, Barrick announced that its Founder
and Chairman, Peter Munk, would retire as Chairman
and step down from the Board of Directors at the
company’s 2014 Annual General Meeting (“AGM”).
John Thornton, currently Co-Chairman, will become
Chairman following the 2014 AGM.
In addition, Howard Beck and Brian Mulroney will
not stand for re-election as Directors at the 2014 AGM.
Donald Carty and Robert Franklin, who joined Barrick’s
Board following the acquisition of Placer Dome, resigned
as Directors of Barrick in December. The Board has
nominated four new Independent Directors to stand for
election at the company’s upcoming AGM: Ned Goodman,
Nancy Lockhart, David Naylor and Ernie Thrasher.
We also announced we will implement a new
executive compensation plan in 2014 that is fully aligned
with the principle of pay-for-performance, and further
links compensation with the long-term interests of
shareholders. The Company has consulted extensively
with shareholders in the development of this plan and
continues to do so. Details will be announced in the
management proxy circular prior to the AGM.
In January 2014, we appointed Jim Gowans as Chief
Operating Officer in December 2013, an experienced
executive who brings four decades of global mining
operations experience to Barrick.
2. For a breakdown of reserves and resources by category and additional
information relating to reserves and resources, see pages 149 to 156 of this
Financial Report.
21
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Outlook for 2014
2014 Guidance Summary
($ millions, except per ounce/pound data)
Gold production and costs
Production (millions of ounces)2
Cost of sales3
Gold unit production costs
All-in sustaining cash costs ($ per ounce)
Adjusted operating costs ($ per ounce)
Depreciation ($ per ounce)
Copper production and costs
Production (millions of pounds)
Cost of sales4
Copper unit production costs
C1 cash costs ($ per pound)
Depreciation ($ per pound)
C3 fully allocated costs ($ per pound)
Exploration and evaluation
Exploration
Evaluation
General and administrative5
Other expense6
Finance costs7
Capital expenditures:
Minesite sustaining8
Minesite expansion
Projects
Total capital expenditures
Effective income tax rate9
Key Assumptions
Gold Price ($/ounce)
Copper Price ($/pound)
Silver Price ($/ounce)
Oil Price ($/barrel)
AUD Exchange Rate
ARS Exchange Rate
CLP Exchange Rate
Final 2013
Guidance
7.0 – 7.4
6,100 – 6,500
900 – 975
575 – 600
195 – 205
520 – 550
1,100 – 1,200
1.90 – 2.00
0.30 – 0.40
2.40 – 2.60
230 – 250
200 – 210
30 – 40
160 – 180
420 – 440
585 – 610
2,100 – 2,300
500 – 550
1,900 – 2,150
4,500 – 5,000
>30%
2013
Actual1
7.2
6,149
915
566
198
2014
Guidance
6.0 – 6.5
5,900 – 6,200
920 – 980
590 – 640
220 – 240
539
1,091
470 – 500
1,000 – 1,200
1.92
0.35
2.42
215
179
36
401
961
657
2,418
468
2,114
5,000
34.5%
1.90 – 2.10
0.40 – 0.50
2.50 – 2.75
200 – 240
170 – 200
30 – 40
380 – 400
475 – 525
800 – 825
2,000 – 2,200
300 – 375
100 – 125
2,400 – 2,700
~50%
$ 1,300
$ 3.25
20
$
$ 100
$ 0.91
8.50
515
1. Figures include amounts relating to discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.
2. Guidance for gold production reflects Barrick’s equity share of production from ABG (73.9%) and Pueblo Viejo (60%).
3. Cost of sales applicable to gold includes depreciation expense and cost of sales applicable to the non-controlling equity interest in ABG and Pueblo Viejo. Cost of sales
guidance does not include proceeds from by-product metal sales, whereas guidance for adjusted operating costs does reflect these items.
4. Cost of sales applicable to copper includes depreciation expense.
5. In 2013 we have amended the presentation of corporate administration to include certain general and administrative expenditures related to management of our
operating unit offices, which were previously classified within other expense. The updated presentation reflects the structure in which Barrick is now organized and
includes costs related to the oversight and governance of the company. As a result of the amended presentation, general and administrative expenses for 2013
now include corporate administration costs of $168 million (2013 guidance: $160 – $180 million), operating unit administration costs of $209 million and other
departmental overhead costs previously included within other expense of $25 million.
6. Other expense is expected to be lower in 2014 as 2013 costs include expenses totaling approximately $750 million that were excluded from our definition of
adjusted net earnings in 2013, primarily project care and maintenance and demobilization costs at Pascua-Lama and Jabal Sayid, foreign currency translation losses
on working capital balances and the effect of discount rate changes on environmental provisions at closed sites which were not reflected in our 2013 budget as
they were unanticipated. Our 2014 other expense guidance range of $475 – $525 includes approximately $250 million in project care and maintenance costs at
Pascua-Lama and Jabal Sayid, but excludes amounts attributable to foreign currency translation losses on working capital balances, which are dependent on
movements in foreign exchange rates.
7. 2013 finance costs include a $90M loss on debt extinguishment arising from the debt repurchase that was excluded from our definition of adjusted net earnings.
8. Beginning in 2014, we have amended the presentation of minesite sustaining capital expenditures to include capital spending required to maintain current planned
production levels at our operating sites, including minesite development expenditures that were previously categorized separately as mine development, which includes
capitalized production phase stripping costs at our open pit mines, underground mine development and exploration and evaluation expenditures that meet our criteria
for capitalization. In 2013, minesite sustaining capital expenditures were $1,102 million (2013 guidance: $1,000 – $1,100) and mine development capital expenditures
were $1,316 million (2013 guidance: $1,100 – $1,200). Total minesite sustaining capital expenditures came in just above the top end of our guidance range, primarily
due to the reclassification of certain expenditures from minesite expansion to minesite sustaining in order to conform to the WGC definition of sustaining capital.
9. Our effective income tax rate on ordinary income is expected to be higher in 2014, primarily due to the full year impact of the Pueblo Viejo SLA amendment which was
substantively enacted in Q4 2013, as well as certain expenditures with no offsetting tax deductions in 2014, primarily at our Pascua-Lama project.
22
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2014 Guidance Analysis
We prepare estimates of future production based on
mine plans that reflect the expected method by which
we will mine reserves at each site. Actual gold and
copper production may vary from these estimates due
to a number of operational risk factors, including
whether the volume and/or grade of ore mined differs
from estimates, changing mining rates, and/or short-
term mining conditions that require different sequential
development of ore bodies or mining in different areas
of the mine. Mining rates are also impacted by various
non-operating risks and operating risks and hazards
inherent at each operation, including those described
on page 17.
We prepare estimates of cost of sales, adjusted
operating costs and all-in sustaining costs based on
expected costs associated with mine plans that reflect
the expected method by which we will mine reserves at
each site. Cost of sales, adjusted operating costs and
all-in sustaining costs per ounce, C1 cash costs, and C3
fully allocated costs are also affected by ore metallurgy
that impacts gold and copper recovery rates, labor costs,
the cost of mining supplies and services, foreign currency
exchange rates and the accounting for stripping costs
incurred during the production phase of the mine. In the
normal course of our operations, we manage these risks
to mitigate, where economically feasible, the effect these
risks have on our operating results.
Consolidated Guidance
We expect 2014 gold production to be about 6.0 to
6.5 million ounces. Our 2014 gold production is expected
to be lower than 2013 as a result of the following:
n Sale of Yilgarn South sites and the Plutonic mine and
the announced sales of Kanowna and Marigold, which
are anticipated to close in March and April 2014,
respectively (2013 production of about 730 thousand
ounces in the aggregate);
n Lower production at Cortez (2013 production of
1.337 million ounces); and
n The cessation of mining activity at our Pierina mine in
Peru (2013 production of 97 thousand ounces).
These decreases are expected to be partially offset by an
increase in production at Pueblo Viejo as the site achieves
full ramp-up in 2014, and an increase in production
at Veladero.
Cost of sales applicable to gold is expected to be in
the range of $5.9 to $6.2 billion, which is in line with the
$6.1 billion in 2013, primarily due to the impact of an
increase in tons processed on cost of sales as compared
to the prior year, offset by the impact of the disposition
of the Yilgarn South sites and Plutonic and the expected
disposition of Kanowna and Marigold.
Adjusted operating costs are expected to be in the
range of $590 to $640 per ounce, up from $566 per
ounce in 2013. The increase in adjusted operating costs
per ounce is primarily due to the decrease in production
and sales volumes, particularly at Cortez, which has a
corresponding negative impact on unit production costs.
All-in sustaining costs are expected to be in the
range of $920 to $980 per ounce for gold, up slightly
from $915 per ounce in 2013, primarily due to the
increase in adjusted operating costs per ounce sold from
$566 per ounce to our expected range of $590 to
$640 per ounce, partially offset by a decrease in minesite
sustaining capital expenditures due to the completion of
significant production phase stripping activities at
Porgera, Bald Mountain, Cowal and ABG in 2013.
We expect to incur approximately $200 to
$240 million of Exploration and Evaluation (“E&E”)
expenditures in 2014. E&E spend primarily relates to
ongoing programs focusing on near-term resource
additions and conversion at our existing mines as well as
support for early stage exploration in our operating
districts and emerging areas in order to generate quality
projects for future years. We expect to capitalize about
15% of our E&E expenditures in 2014.
Geographically we expect approximately 50% of
E&E expenditures to occur in North America, the majority
of which are related to our Goldrush project in Nevada,
combined with other ongoing programs in Nevada. We
expect approximately 25% of E&E expenditures to occur
in South America, 10% in Australia Pacific and the
balance incurred by ABG.
Finance costs primarily represent interest expense on
long-term debt. We expect higher finance costs in 2014
as a result of the cessation of capitalizing interest on
Pascua-Lama in fourth quarter 2013 as a result of our
decision to temporarily suspend the project. Consequently,
we do not expect to capitalize significant interest costs
in 2014.
23
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Total capital expenditures for 2014 are expected to
Project capital expenditures reflect capital
be in the range of $2.4 to $2.7 billion, compared to
$5.0 billion in 2013. The expected decrease primarily
relates to lower project capital expenditures as a result of
our decision to temporarily suspend construction
activities at Pascua-Lama, combined with lower minesite
sustaining and mine expansion capital expenditures.
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures reflect the
capital spending required to support current planned
production levels and which do not meet our definition
of non-sustaining capital. This includes capitalized
production phase stripping costs at our open pit mines,
underground mine development and E&E expenditures
that meet our criteria for capitalization. Minesite
sustaining capital expenditures are expected to decrease
from 2013 expenditure levels of $2,418 million to a
range of about $2,000 to $2,200 million, mainly due to
the completion of significant production phase stripping
activities at Porgera, Bald Mountain, Cowal and ABG in
2013 and due to the recent sales of Yilgarn South sites
and Plutonic, and the announced sales of Kanowna and
Marigold (2013 minesite sustaining capital expenditures
of $145 million in the aggregate).
Minesite expansion capital expenditures includes
non-sustaining capital expenditures at new projects and
existing operations that are related to discrete projects
that significantly increases the net present value of the
mine and are not related to current production activity.
Expansion capital expenditures are expected to decrease
from 2013 expenditure levels of $468 million to a
range of about $300 to $375 million. 2014 expansion
expenditures primarily relate to construction of the
Goldstrike thiosulfate technology project, construction
of the CIL plant at Bulyanhulu, which is expected to be
completed in May, and feasibility and development
expenditures related to the Cortez Hills Lower Zone
expansion, which is expected to extend the mine life
by up to 7 years.
expenditures related to the initial construction of the
project and include all of the expenditures required to
bring the project into operation and achieve commercial
production levels. In 2014, we expect our share of
project capital costs to be in the range of $100 to
$125 million, which is a decrease from project capital
costs of $2,114 million in 2013 primarily as a result of
our decision to temporarily suspend construction
activities at Pascua-Lama in 2013.
Barrick’s effective income tax rate in 2014 is expected
to be about 50 percent based on an average gold price
of $1,300 per ounce. Factors impacting our 2014 income
tax rate include the following:
i) Pueblo Viejo is expected to represent a significant
portion of overall taxable income in 2014 and its tax
rate is expected to be just over 50% following the
amendments to the Special Lease Agreement in 2013.
This compares to an average rate of just over 35% for
Barrick’s other operating mines.
ii) Barrick expects to incur $400–$500 million in expenses
with no offsetting tax deductions primarily attributable
to Pascua-Lama, Jabal Sayid and Porgera. Such
expenses, and their impact on the effective income
tax rate, are expected to be significantly less after
2014. The company may also be able to offset these
amounts against future taxable income.
The company’s effective income tax rate is highly sensitive
to changes in the gold price. While the expenses for
which no deferred tax assets are recognized described in
(ii) do not result in additional tax expense, they do
substantially reduce pre-tax income at lower gold prices
and, in turn, increase the company’s expected effective
income tax rate. Assuming a $1,250 per ounce gold
price in 2014, the effective income tax rate is anticipated
to increase to about 55%.
24
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Outlook Assumptions and Economic Sensitivity Analysis
Gold revenue
Copper revenue3
Gold all-in sustaining costs
Gold royalties & production taxes
WTI crude oil price4
Australian dollar exchange rate4
Argentina peso exchange rate
Copper C1 cash costs
WTI crude oil price4
Chilean peso exchange rate4
2014 Guidance
Hypothetical
assumption
change
Impact on
AISC
EBITDA1
(millions)
$ 1,300/oz2 +/- $ 100/oz
+ $ 0.50/lb
- $ 0.50/lb
$ 3.25/lb2
$ 3.25/lb2
n/a
n/a
n/a
$ 610 – $ 630
$ 240 – $ 250
$ 120 – $ 130
$ 1,300/oz
$ 100/bbl
0.91:1
8.5:1
$ 100/oz
$ 10/bbl
10%
10%
$ 3/oz
$ 5/oz
$ 15/oz
$ 3/oz
$ 100/bbl
515:1
$ 10/bbl
10%
$ 0.02/lb
$ 0.01/lb
$ 19
$ 33
$ 73
$ 19
$ 10
$ 5
1. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see
page 67 of this MD&A.
2. We have assumed a gold price of $1,300 per ounce and copper price of $3.25 per pound, which are in line with current market prices.
3. Utilizing option collar strategies, the company has protected the downside on approximately half of its expected 2014 copper production at an average floor price
of $3.00 per pound and can participate on the same amount up to an average price of $3.75 per pound. The realized price on all 2014 copper production is
expected to be reduced by approximately $0.02 per pound as a result of the net premium paid on option hedging strategies. Our remaining copper production
is subject to market prices.
4. Due to hedging activities we are partially protected against changes in these factors.
Operating Unit Guidance
Our 2013 gold production, adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and forecast gold production, adjusted
operating costs and all-in sustaining costs ranges by operating unit for 2014 are as follows:
2013
production
(000s ozs)
2013
adjusted
operating
costs ($/oz)
2013
all-in
sustaining
costs ($/oz)
Operating unit
Gold
Cortez
Goldstrike
Pueblo Viejo1
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
Core Sites
North America
Australia Pacific
ABG1
Other (Pierina)
Total Gold
1,337
892
488
606
641
3,964
858
1,773
474
97
7,166
222
606
561
361
501
414
792
725
846
1,085
566
2014
forecast
production
(000s ozs)
925 – 975
865 – 915
600 – 700
570 – 610
650 – 700
2014
forecast
adjusted
operating
costs ($/oz)
350 – 380
600 – 640
385 – 445
390 – 430
620 – 670
2014
forecast
all-in sustaining
costs ($/oz)
750 – 780
920 – 950
510 – 610
640 – 680
940 – 990
3,800 – 4,000
450 – 500
750 – 800
795 – 845
1,000 – 1,080
480 – 510
–
780 – 805
825 – 875
740 – 790
–
1,075 – 1,100
1,050 – 1,100
1,100 – 1,175
–
433
901
735
627
833
668
1,235
994
1,362
1,349
915
6,000 – 6,5002
590 – 640
920 – 980
2013
production
(millions lbs)
2013
C1 cash
costs ($/lb)
2013
C3 fully
allocated
costs ($/lb)
2014
forecast
production
(millions lbs)
2014
forecast
C1 cash
costs ($/lb)
2014
forecast C3
fully allocated
costs ($/lb)
Copper
539
1.92
2.42
470 – 500
1.90 – 2.10
2.50 – 2.75
1. Represents our equity share of production.
2. Operating unit guidance ranges reflect expectations at each individual operating unit, but do not add up to corporate-wide guidance range total.
25
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Cortez
At Cortez we expect 2014 gold production to be in the
range of 925 to 975 thousand ounces. Cortez production
is expected to be lower than 2013 mainly due to a
decrease in open pit and underground ore grades as
expected in the life of mine plan. The decrease in open
pit grade is primarily due to the transition from the
higher grade phase 3 Cortez Hills ore in 2013 to lower
grade phase 4 ore in 2014. Mining in 2014 is also
planned in the Pipeline and South Gap pits, which are
primarily comprised of lower grade heap leach ore. The
decrease in underground grade is due to a transition to
a lower grade underground ore zone in 2014 and a
change in the mix of ore to a higher percentage of heap
leach material, which have lower recovery rates.
In 2014, we expect adjusted operating costs to be
in the range of $350 to $380 per ounce, which are
expected to be higher than 2013 levels primarily due to
an increase in total open pit costs as a result of higher
diesel consumption following the addition of 20 365-ton
class haul trucks in 2013, and higher total processing
costs due to a larger proportion of refractory material
that is processed at Goldstrike as compared to the prior
year, combined with the impact of lower production
levels on unit production costs. All-in sustaining costs are
expected to be in the range of $750 to $780 per ounce,
which is higher than 2013 primarily due to an increase in
ore tons mined and processed, and an increase in
sustaining capital as a result of an increase in production
phase stripping activity for Phase 4 of the Cortez Hills
open pit following the completion of mining in Phase 3
in 2013.
Goldstrike
At Goldstrike we expect 2014 production to be in the
range of 865 to 915 thousand ounces, which is consistent
with 2013 production levels. In 2014 Goldstrike is
expected to have a decrease in ore tons mined and
processed as compared to the prior year, primarily due
to the impact of the autoclave shutdown during the
first part of the year to facilitate construction and
start up of the thiosulphate technology project, and
the processing of more ore tons from Cortez.
In 2014, we expect adjusted operating costs to be
in the range of $600 to $640 per ounce, in line with
2013 levels. Goldstrike’s 2014 all-in sustaining costs are
expected to be in the range of $920 to $950 per ounce,
slightly higher than 2013 levels, mainly due to a slight
increase in minesite sustaining capital as compared to the
26
prior year. Production is anticipated to increase to above
1.0 million ounces in 2015 with a full year of operations
from the modified autoclaves.3
Pueblo Viejo
At Pueblo Viejo, we expect our equity share of 2014
gold production to be in the range of 600 to 700
thousand ounces. Pueblo Viejo production is expected to
be higher than 2013 levels, mainly as a result of greater
plant availability and the completion of the plant
de-bottlenecking modifications and therefore more tons
processed as the site achieves full ramp-up in 2014.
We expect adjusted operating costs to be in the
range of $385 to $445 per ounce and all-in sustaining
costs to be in the range of $510 to $610 per ounce,
which are lower than 2013 levels primarily due to the
ramp-up to full production capacity in the first half of
2014, combined with higher silver and copper
by-product credits and lower power costs as a result
of cost savings following commissioning of the
215 megawatt power plant in third quarter 2013.
The production, adjusted operating cost and all-in
sustaining cost guidance ranges at Pueblo Viejo are
dependent on the ramp-up as well as expected grade
and recovery rates. Consequently, our guidance ranges
for these metrics reflect this potential variability.
Lagunas Norte
At Lagunas Norte we expect 2014 production to be in
the range of 570 to 610 thousand ounces, consistent
with 2013 levels, which reflects an increase in ore tons
processed offset by lower processed ore grades as
compared to the prior year. The increase in ore tons
mined in 2014 is mainly due to an increase in fleet
availability and utilization following the transfer of four
trucks and one loader from our Pierina mine.
In 2014, we expect adjusted operating costs to be
in the range of $390 to $430 per ounce and all-in
sustaining costs to be in the range of $640 to $680 per
ounce, which are expected to be higher than 2013 levels
primarily due to an increase in fuel and personnel costs
related to the increase in ore tons processed, higher
expensed waste stripping as a result of mining more
waste tons in the Alexa zone of the pit, and additional
processing costs due to an increase in run of mine tons
placed on the leach pad combined with a full year of
operation from the CIC plant in 2014. Higher tons
processed require increased amounts of power and
reagents as compared to the prior year.
3. Actual results will vary depending on how the ramp-up progresses.
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Veladero
At Veladero, we expect 2014 production to be in the
range of 650 to 700 thousand ounces. Veladero
production is expected to be higher than 2013 levels
as a result of an increase in expected recovery of
ounces placed on the leach pad, combined with higher
expected ore grades from the Argenta and Filo Federico
pits in 2014.
In 2014, we expect adjusted operating costs to be
in the range of $620 to $670 per ounce and all-in
sustaining costs to be in the range of $940 to $990 per
ounce, which are expected to be higher than 2013 levels
mainly due to a decrease in silver by-product credits
following completion of mining in the Amable pit in
2013, which has significantly higher silver grades than
the Federico pit that will be the primary source of ore
in 2014. Operating costs at Veladero are also highly
sensitive to local inflation and the foreign exchange rate
of the Argentine peso. In early 2014, the peso has
depreciated by about 20% compared to the US dollar.
We have assumed an average ARS:USD exchange rate
of 8.5:1 for the purposes of preparing our adjusted
operating cost and all-in sustaining cost guidance
for 2014.
The mine continues to be subject to restrictions that
affect the amount of leach solution. We are in discussions
with regulatory authorities with respect to permit
amendments to reflect the current circumstances and to
allow operation of the leach pad in alignment with
permit requirements. Failure to obtain permit amendments
in a timely manner would have an increasing impact on
2014 production and potentially on the relationship with
Instituto Provincial de Exploraciones y Explotaciones
Mineras (“IPEEM”) of the Province of San Juan under the
exploitation agreement governing the Company’s right
to operate the mine. Our 2014 operating guidance
assumes that we will receive these permit amendments
as expected.
North America – Other
We expect 2014 production to be in the range of 795
to 845 thousand ounces. Production is expected to be
lower than 2013 levels, mainly due to the impact of the
Ruby Hill high wall failure in 2013 and expected sale of
Marigold, which produced about 54 thousand ounces
in 2013.
In 2014, we expect adjusted operating costs to be in
the range of $780 to $805 per ounce, in line with 2013
levels, and expect all-in sustaining costs to be in the
range of $1,075 to $1,100 per ounce, which is lower
than 2013 levels, mainly due to lower minesite sustaining
capital as compared to the prior year, as a result of the
expected sale of Marigold in April 2014. Lower minesite
sustaining capital is partly offset by an advance in
production phase stripping activity at Bald Mountain in
2014 following the transfer of Ruby Hill equipment to
Bald Mountain in fourth quarter 2013.
Australia Pacific
In Australia Pacific, we expect 2014 production to be in
the range of 1,000 to 1,080 thousand ounces, which
is lower than 2013 levels, mainly as a result of the sale
of our Yilgarn South sites at the end of third quarter
2013, the sale of Plutonic in first quarter 2014 and the
expected sale of Kanowna also in first quarter 2014,
which combined produced about 680 thousand ounces
in 2013 at adjusted operating costs of $756 per ounce
and all-in sustaining costs of $938 per ounce.
In 2014, we expect adjusted operating costs to be in
the range of $825 to $875 per ounce and all-in sustaining
costs to be in the range of $1,050 to $1,100 per ounce,
which are expected to be higher than 2013 levels
primarily due to an increase in mining costs at Porgera
due to the expensing of waste removal costs above
stage 5 of the open pit, as a result of the change in mine
plan to focus on the higher grade underground portion
of the mine, combined with higher open pit mining costs
at Cowal and KCGM as compared to the prior year.
ABG
At ABG, we expect our equity share of 2014 production
to be in the range of 480 to 510 thousand ounces, which
is higher than 2013 levels. We expect higher production
at Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi mainly due to higher
head grades as a result of mine planning changes, and
commissioning of the new CIL plant at Bulyanhulu,
which commences production in May, partly offset by
a decrease in production at North Mara due to a
reduction in planned head grade.
In 2014, we expect adjusted operating costs to be in
the range of $740 to $790 per ounce, which is lower
than 2013 levels, mainly due to ongoing improvements
and efficiencies realized as a result of the operational
review in 2013. We expect all-in sustaining costs to be in
the range of $1,100 to $1,175 per ounce, which is lower
than 2013 levels mainly due to a decrease in minesite
sustaining capital and corporate overhead as compared
to the prior year.
27
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS USD
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT GOLD PRICES
AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT GOLD PRICES
$/oz
2,000
1,750
1,300
1,200
1,100
1,000
900
800
700
2009
2010
2011
Average Spot Price
USD Index
AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT GOLD PRICES
(dollars per ounce)
2,000
1,750
1,500
1,250
1,000
750
500
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
The decline in the price of gold in 2013 was due in part
to incremental improvements in the prospects for the
U.S. economy that led to concerns about reductions
in the unprecedented monetary stimulus that has been
provided by the US Federal Reserve and other global
central banks. These concerns led to a weakening in
investor sentiment regarding gold, particularly in the
Western world, that was evidenced by decreased holdings
in Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”) of 29 million ounces.
90
However, physical demand for jewelry and other uses,
85
particularly in China and India, was strong and continues
to be a significant driver of the overall gold market.
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
GOLD ETF HOLDINGS as at December 31
(millions of ounces)
88.9
79.6
73.1
60.2
59.7
60
100
55
50
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Source: UBS
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Copper
Copper production is expected to decrease from
539 million pounds in 2013 to be in the range of 470 to
500 million pounds in 2014, mainly due to lower
production from Zaldívar. Lower production at Zaldívar
is expected as a result of lower ore tons being placed on
the leach pads due to lower availability of ore from the
pit in 2014, in line with the mine plan, combined with
lower recoveries as a result of the processing of a higher
percentage of secondary sulfide material in 2014.
Production at Lumwana is expected to be similar to
2013 levels.
Cost of sales applicable to copper is expected to be
in the range of $1,000 to $1,200 million, which is
consistent with $1,091 million in 2013. C1 cash costs
are expected to be in the range of $1.90 to $2.10 per
pound for copper, as compared to C1 cash costs of
$1.92 per pound in 2013. C1 cash costs are expected
to increase primarily due to Zaldívar as a result of the
impact of lower production on unit costs. C3 fully
allocated costs are expected to be in the range of $2.50
to $2.75 as compared to C3 fully allocated costs of
$2.42 per pound in 2013. C3 fully allocated costs are
expected to be higher than 2013 levels primarily due to
the impact of higher depreciation on lower production
at Zaldívar and higher depreciation at Lumwana.
Market Overview
Gold and Copper
The market prices of gold and copper are the primary
drivers of our profitability and our ability to generate
free cash flow for our shareholders. The prices of gold
and copper are subject to volatile price movements over
short periods of time and are affected by numerous
industry and macroeconomic factors. Gold price volatility
remained high in 2013, with the price ranging from
$1,181 per ounce to $1,696 per ounce. The average
market price for the year of $1,411 per ounce
represented a decrease of 15% versus 2012.
28
90
85
80
75
70
65
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The reserve gold holdings as a percentage of total
reserves of emerging market countries, such as the BRIC
countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China), are significantly
lower than other developed countries. The central banks
of these developing economies hold a significant portion
of their reserves in US dollar denominated government
assets and, as they identify a need to diversify their
portfolio and reduce their exposure to the US dollar, we
believe that gold will be one of the main beneficiaries. In
conjunction with the very low amount of gold sold under
the CBGA quota, which is expected to continue in the
current year of the agreement, the net purchases of gold
by global central banks provide a strong indication that
gold is viewed as a reserve asset and a de facto currency.
OFFICIAL GOLD HOLDINGS as at December 31, 2013
(% of reserves)
71.0
67.5
66.1
65.5
80
60
40
20
0
A
S
U
y
n
a
m
r
e
G
y
l
a
t
I
e
c
n
a
r
F
d
n
a
l
r
e
z
t
i
w
S
Source: World Gold Council
7.9
7.9
7.6
a
i
s
s
u
R
i
a
d
n
I
1.1
i
a
n
h
C
0.7
l
i
z
a
r
B
During 2013, London Metals Exchange (“LME”) copper
prices traded in a range of $2.99 to $3.79 per pound,
averaged $3.32 per pound, and closed the year at
$3.35 per pound. Copper’s strength lies mainly in strong
physical demand from emerging markets, especially
90
China, which has resulted in a physical deficit in recent
81
years. Copper prices should continue to be influenced by
72
demand from Asia, global economic growth, the limited
63
availability of scrap metal and production levels of mines
and smelters in the future.
54
45
36
27
18
9
0
29
Going forward, we believe that gold will attract investment
interest through its role as a safe haven investment, store
of value and alternative to fiat currency due to concerns
over geopolitical issues, sovereign debt and deficit levels,
bank stability, future inflation prospects, and continuing
accommodative monetary policies put in place by many
of the world’s central banks. While there are risks that
investor interest in gold could decrease further, we
believe that the continuing uncertain macroeconomic
environment, together with the limited choice of
alternative safe haven investments, is supportive of
continued strong demand for gold.
Gold prices also continue to be influenced by
long-term trends in global gold mine production and
the impact of central bank gold activities. Gold
production has increased in recent years with the
extension of the lives of older mines due to the rising
gold price. The time requirement to bring projects to
the production stage and the increasing costs and risks
of building a mine, including concerns of resource
nationalism and lengthened permitting processes, are
expected to slow the pace of new production in
future years.
In the fourth year of the Central Bank Gold
Agreement (“CBGA”), which ended in September 2013,
the signatory members sold 5 tonnes of gold, or less
than 2% of the maximum agreed amount. In addition,
for the fourth consecutive year, global central banks
were net buyers of gold in 2013, with the central banks
of Turkey, Russia, Kazakhstan, and South Korea, among
others, adding to their gold reserves.
OFFICIAL SECTOR GOLD PURCHASES
(tonnes)
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
100
544
457
359
77
(34)
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013E
Source: World Gold Council and Thomson Reuters GFMS
600
400
200
0
-200
-400
-600
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT
COPPER PRICES (dollars per pound)
AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT
SILVER PRICES (dollars per ounce)
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Utilizing option collar strategies, the Company has
protected the downside on approximately half of our
expected 2014 copper production at an average floor
price of $3.00 per pound and can participate on the
same amount up to an average price of $3.75 per
pound. Our realized price on all 2014 copper production
is expected to be reduced by approximately $0.02 per
pound as a result of the net premium paid on option
hedging strategies. Our remaining copper production is
subject to market prices.
AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT
COPPER PRICES (dollars per pound)
We have provisionally priced copper sales for which
final price determination versus the relevant copper
index is outstanding at the balance sheet date. As at
2,000
December 31, 2013, we have recorded 63 million
1,750
pounds of copper sales subject to final settlement at an
average provisional price of $3.34 per pound. The impact
1,500
to net income before taxation of a 10% movement in
the market price of copper would be approximately
1,250
$21 million, holding all other variables constant.
1,000
Silver
Silver traded in a wide range of $18.23 per ounce
750
to $32.48 per ounce in 2013, averaged $23.79 per
500
ounce and closed the year at $19.50 per ounce. The
physical silver market is currently in surplus, but investor
interest continues to be price supportive and continuing
global economic growth is expected to improve
industrial demand.
2009
2011
2010
2007
2008
Silver prices do not significantly impact our current
operating earnings, cash flows or gold adjusted
operating costs. Silver prices, however, will have a
significant impact on the overall economics for our
Pascua-Lama project.
During 2013, we closed out our silver hedge book,
which had consisted of 65 million ounces of option collars
from 2013 to 2018, for net proceeds of $190 million.
$21 million of the gains related to our silver hedge book
remain in other comprehensive income and will be
recognized in net income on the original contract
maturity dates.
675
AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT
SILVER PRICES (dollars per ounces)
Currency Exchange Rates
The results of our mining operations outside of the
United States are affected by US dollar exchange rates.
We have exposure to the Australian and Canadian dollars
through a combination of mine operating and corporate
administration costs and exposure to the Chilean peso as
a result of our Pascua-Lama project and Chilean mine
operating costs. We also have exposure to the Argentinean
peso through operating costs at our Veladero mine and
expected future capital and operating costs at our
Pascua-Lama project. In addition, we have exposure to
the Papua New Guinea kina, Peruvian sol, Zambian
kwacha, Tanzanian shilling and Dominican peso through
mine operating and capital costs.
575
475
625
525
425
2009
2010
2011
30
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Fluctuations in the US dollar increase the volatility of
CLP Currency Contracts
our costs reported in US dollars, subject to protection
that we have put in place through our currency hedging
program. In 2013, the Australian dollar traded in a range
of $0.88 to $1.06 against the US dollar, while the US
dollar against the Canadian dollar and Chilean peso
yielded ranges of $0.98 to $1.07 and CLP466 to
CLP536, respectively.
Our currency hedge position has provided benefits
to us in the form of hedge gains recorded within our
operating costs when contract exchange rates are
compared to prevailing market exchange rates as
follows: 2013 – $268 million; 2012 – $336 million; and
2011 – $344 million. As a result of the gains from our
currency hedging program, adjusted operating costs
were reduced by $37 per ounce in 2013. Also for 2013,
we recorded currency hedge gains in our corporate
administration costs of $11 million (2012 – $20 million
and 2011 – $24 million) and capitalized additional
currency hedge gains of $14 million (2012 – $13 million
and 2011 – $64 million).
AUD Currency Contracts
Contracts
Effective
average
(AUD hedge rate
(AUDUSD)
millions)
% of total
expected
AUD
exposure1
hedged
% of
expected
operating
Crystallized
cost gain/(loss) in
OCI2 (USD
millions)
exposure
hedged
% of total
% of
expected
expected operating
Contracts
Effective
average
CLP hedge rate
(USDCLP)
millions)4
CLP
exposure1 exposure
hedged
hedged
Crystallized
cost gain/(loss) in
OCI2 (USD
millions)
2014
2015
81,750
78,000
500
513
37%
41%
92%
100%
9
–
1. Includes all forecasted operating, administrative, sustainable and eligible
project capital expenditures.
2. To be reclassified from OCI to earnings when indicated.
3. Includes C$415 million CAD collar contracts with an average rate of
$1.00 – $1.12.
4. Includes CLP 159,750 million collar contracts with an average rate of 506 – 586.
AVERAGE MONTHLY AUD SPOT AND HEDGE RATES
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
2014
2015
2016
183
370
85
0.94
0.95
0.91
21%
45%
11%
27%
54%
13%
112
(6)
(19)
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Average Spot Rate
Average Hedge Rate
CAD Currency Contracts
AVERAGE MONTHLY CAD SPOT AND HEDGE RATES
Effective
average
Contracts hedge rate
(USDCAD)
(CAD millions)3
% of total
expected
CAD
exposure1
hedged
% of
expected
operating
cost
exposure
hedged
2014
2015
295
120
1.00
1.02
68%
29%
75%
31%
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Average Spot Rate
Average Hedge Rate
31
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
AVERAGE MONTHLY CLP SPOT AND HEDGE RATES
CRUDE OIL MARKET PRICE (WTI) (dollars per barrel)
650
600
550
500
450
400
$120
650
$100
600
$80
550
$60
500
$40
450
$20
400
650
600
550
500
450
400
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
80
US Dollar Interest Rates
Beginning in 2008, in response to the contraction of
global credit markets and in an effort to spur economic
activity and avoid potential deflation, the US Federal
Reserve reduced its benchmark rate to between 0%
and 0.25%. The benchmark was kept at this level
120
through 2013. Throughout the year, the Federal Open
Market Committee of the US Federal Reserve reiterated
100
that the current 0% to 0.25% range for the benchmark
rate would remain appropriate at least as long as the
US unemployment rate remains above 6.5%, projected
inflation remains below 2.5% and longer-term inflation
expectations continue to be well anchored. In addition,
we expect the US Federal Reserve to continue to use
monetary policy initiatives, such as purchases of agency-
backed mortgage securities and longer-term Treasury
securities, in an effort to keep long-term interest
rates low and increase employment. We expect such
initiatives to be followed by incremental increases to
short-term rates once economic conditions and credit
markets normalize.
40
20
60
Average Spot Rate
Average Hedge Rate
Fuel
For 2013, the price of West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”)
crude oil traded between $86 and $112 per barrel,
averaged $98 per barrel and closed the year at $98 per
barrel. Concerns over global economic growth, supply
and transportation issues and geopolitical tensions in
certain oil producing regions combined to create volatility
in the price of oil during the year.
In 2013, we recorded hedge gains in earnings of
$9 million on our fuel hedge positions (2012 – $24 million
gain and 2011 – $48 million gain).
Financial Fuel Hedge Summary
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Barrels1
(thousands)
Average % of expected
exposure
price
1,284
1,920
2,400
1,440
600
$ 91
89
84
82
81
25%
48%
56%
33%
17%
1. Refers to contracts for a combination of WTI and BRENT swaps/options. As a
result, our average price on hedged barrels for 2014 – 2018 is $85 per barrel
on a WTI-equivalent basis.
32
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
At present, our interest rate exposure mainly relates
US DOLLAR INTEREST RATES (%)
to interest receipts on our cash balances ($2.4 billion
at December 31, 2013); the mark-to-market value of
derivative instruments; the fair value and ongoing
payments under US dollar interest-rate swaps; and to the
interest payments on our variable-rate debt ($1.2 billion
at December 31, 2013). Currently, the amount of interest
expense recorded in our consolidated statement of
income is not materially impacted by changes in interest
rates, because the majority of debt was issued at fixed
interest rates. The relative amounts of variable-rate
financial assets and liabilities may change in the future,
depending on the amount of operating cash flow we
generate, as well as the level of capital expenditures and
our ability to borrow on favorable terms using fixed
rate debt instruments.
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
5 Year Interest Rates
10 Year Interest Rates
30 Year Interest Rates
3 Month LIBOR
Review of Annual Financial Results
Revenue
($ millions, except per ounce/pound data in dollars)
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
2011
Gold
000s oz sold1
Revenue
Market price2
Realized price2,3
Copper
millions lbs sold
Revenue1
Market price2
Realized price2,3
Oil & gas sales
Other metal sales
7,174 7,292 7,550
$ 10,670 $ 12,564 $ 12,255
1,411 1,669 1,572
$ 1,407 $ 1,669 $ 1,578
519
472
444
$ 1,651 $ 1,689 $ 1,646
4.00
3.82
177
158
3.32
3.39
93
190 $
3.61
3.57
153
141 $
$
1. Includes our equity share of gold ounces from ABG and Pueblo Viejo.
2. Per ounce/pound weighted average.
3. Realized price is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standard
meaning under IFRS. For further information and a detailed reconciliation,
please see page 68 of this MD&A.
In 2013, gold revenues were $10,670 million, down
$1,894 million, or 15%, compared to the prior year. The
decrease was due to lower realized gold prices and sales
volumes. Copper revenues for 2013 were $1,651 million,
down $38 million, or 2%, compared to the prior year.
The decrease was primarily due to lower copper realized
prices, partially offset by higher sales volumes.
Realized gold prices of $1,407 per ounce were down
$262 per ounce, or 16%, compared to the prior year.
The decrease in realized prices reflects the 15% decline
in market gold prices in 2013. Realized copper prices for
2013 were $3.39 per pound, down $0.18 per pound, or
5
5%, compared to the prior year due to a decline in
market copper prices in 2013.
4
In 2013, gold production of 7.2 million ounces
decreased by 3% over the prior year due to lower
3
production across all operating sites, with the exception
of Pueblo Viejo and ABG. Production of 7.2 million
2
ounces was in line with our original guidance range of
7.0 to 7.4 million ounces.
1
Copper production in 2013 of 539 million pounds
increased by 15% over the prior year, primarily due to
0
higher production at Lumwana, partially offset by slightly
lower production at Zaldívar. Copper production was
in line with our most recent guidance range of 520 to
550 million pounds.
33
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Production Costs
($ millions, except per ounce/pound data in dollars)
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121
2011
Cost of sales
Direct mining cost
Depreciation
Royalty expense
Cost of sales – gold
Adjusted operating costs2,3
All-in sustaining costs2,3
Cost of sales – copper
C1 cash costs2,3
C3 fully allocated costs2,3
$ 5,190 $ 5,232 $ 4,486
1,419
1,651
1,732
335
374
321
5,169
5,817
5,991
463
563
566
821
1,014
915
915
1,227
1,091
1.71
2.05
1.92
$ 2.42 $ 2.85 $ 2.30
1. Figures are restated for new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
2. Per ounce/pound weighted average.
3. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs, C1 cash costs and C3
fully allocated costs are non-GAAP financial performance measures with
no standard meaning under IFRS. For further information and a detailed
reconciliation, please see page 63 of this MD&A.
In 2013, cost of sales applicable to gold was $5,991 million
compared to cost of sales of $5,817 million for the prior
year. The increase over the prior year reflects higher
depreciation, partially offset by lower direct mining costs,
due to lower labor, consumables and maintenance
costs, and a decrease in royalties as a result of the lower
gold price.
Gold adjusted operating costs for 2013 were
$566 per ounce, up $3 per ounce compared to the prior
year, primarily due to the impact of lower production
levels on unit production costs in 2013. Gold adjusted
operating costs of $566 per ounce were below our most
recent guidance range of $575 to $600 per ounce,
reflecting our efforts to reduce costs in light of the
current lower gold price environment. All-in sustaining
costs for 2013 were $915 per ounce, down $99 per
ounce, or 10%, compared to the prior year, primarily due
to a decrease in general & administrative costs as well as
mine development and minesite sustaining capital
expenditures. All-in sustaining costs of $915 per ounce
were at the lower end of our most recent guidance
range of $900 to $975 per ounce.
In 2013, cost of sales applicable to copper was
$1,091, a decrease of $136 million, or 11%, compared
to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to
lower direct mining costs at Lumwana due to the
termination of one of the mining contractors and lower
depreciation as a result of the impairment charges
recorded in fourth quarter 2012, partially offset by
higher sales volumes and higher royalty expense.
C1 cash costs for 2013 were $1.92, down $0.13 per
pound, or 6%, from the prior year. The decrease is
primarily due to the reduction in direct mining costs at
Lumwana combined with the impact of higher
production levels. C1 cash costs of $1.92 per pound
were at the lower end of our most recent guidance
range of $1.90 to $2.00 per pound. C3 fully allocated
costs per pound for 2013 were $2.42 per pound, down
$0.43 per pound, or 15%, from the prior year, primarily
reflecting the effect of the above factors on C1 cash
costs, together with lower depreciation expense as a
result of the impairment charges recorded at Lumwana
in the fourth quarter of 2012. C3 fully allocated costs of
$2.42 per pound were at the lower end of our most
recent guidance range of $2.40 to $2.60 per pound.
General & Administrative Expenses
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121
20111
Corporate administration
Operating segment administration
$ 192
198
$ 274
229
$ 166
266
Total general & administrative expenses
$ 390
$ 503
$ 432
1. Presentation amended to include certain general & administrative expenditures
related to management of our operating unit offices, which were previously
classified within other expense.
General & administrative expenses were $390 million
in 2013, down $113 million, or 22%, compared to the
prior year, reflecting our efforts in 2013 to reduce
overhead expenditures and due to a $20 million decrease
in deferred share compensation costs.
Other Expense (Income)
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
Corporate social responsibility
Currency translation losses
Severance and demobilization costs –
Pascua-Lama
Severance costs
Project care and maintenance costs –
Pascua-Lama
Project care and maintenance costs –
Jabal Sayid
Changes in estimate of rehabilitation
costs for sites in closure
Other items
2013
20121
20111
$ 89
180
$ 83
73
$ 55
22
235
26
65
52
–
2
–
–
6
–
–
–
100
131
39
106
79
148
Total other expense
$ 878
$ 303
$ 310
1. Presentation amended to exclude certain general & administrative expenditures
related to management of our operating unit offices, which are now classified
within general & administrative expenses.
34
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Other expense for 2013 was $878 million compared
to $303 million for the prior year. The increase is primarily
due to project care and maintenance costs at Jabal Sayid,
demobilization and project care and maintenance costs
at Pascua-Lama, an increase in currency translation losses,
a loss on the extinguishment of debt and changes in the
estimate of rehabilitation costs at our sites in closure.
Project care and maintenance costs were $52 million
at Jabal Sayid and $65 million at Pascua-Lama due to
the ramp down of construction activity at those sites in
2013. Severance and demobilization costs at Pascua-
Lama were $235 million, and are primarily attributable to
our decision to temporarily suspend the project in fourth
quarter 2013. As a result of this decision, we accrued an
estimate for contractor costs related to the ramp down
of construction and severance and demobilization costs
in other expense in 2013.
Currency translation losses increased by $107 million
compared to the prior year primarily due to the rapid
devaluation of the Argentine peso, partially offset by
currency translation gains arising from fluctuations in the
Australian dollar and Papua New Guinea kina.
Changes in the estimates of rehabilitation costs at
sites that are in closure increased by $61 million in 2013,
particularly at Pierina, which recorded an increase in its
reclamation liability of $134 million in 2013. This was
partially offset by the effect of the increase in the rate
applied to discount the reclamation liability. The increase
in Pierina’s reclamation liability is primarily due to the
accelerated closure of the mine, which resulted in
anticipated future mining costs, that are only recognized
as incurred, being reclassified as rehabilitation costs,
which are required to be accrued for when a liability
exists. These costs are associated with mining activity
that is necessary to stabilize the open pit. It was
previously anticipated that this activity would be
undertaken while the mine was still in operation.
Exploration and Evaluation
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
Exploration:
Minesite programs
Global programs
Evaluation costs
2013
2012
2011
$ 51
128
29
$ 82
211
66
$ 72
145
129
Exploration and evaluation expense
$ 208
$ 359
$ 346
Exploration and evaluation expense were $208 million in
2013 compared to $359 million in 2012. The decrease is
primarily due to decreased global exploration expenditures,
as part of our cost reduction program and the completion
of several large resource definition programs.
Capital Expenditures1
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
Project capital expenditures3
Minesite sustaining4
Mine development
Minesite expansion3
Capitalized interest
2013
20122
2011
$ 2,137 $ 2,951 $ 2,572
1,437
1,733
1,150
985
1,537
1,316
106
208
468
409
566
303
Total consolidated capital expenditures5
$ 5,374 $ 6,995 $ 5,509
1. These amounts are presented on a 100% accrued basis.
2. Figures are restated for new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
3. Project and expansion capital expenditures are included in our calculation of
all-in costs, but not included in our calculation of all-in sustaining costs.
4. Minesite sustaining includes capital expenditures from discontinued
operations of $64 million for the year ended December 31, 2013
(2012: $128 million).
5. For the purposes of our capital expenditures guidance, we exclude capitalized
interest and non-controlling interest and it totaled $5,000 million in 2013.
Capital expenditures were $5,374 million in 2013, a
decrease of $1,621 million compared to the prior year.
The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in sustaining
capital, particularly at Cortez and Lumwana, and in
project capital expenditures due to Pueblo Viejo achieving
commercial production in January 2013; partially offset
by an increase in minesite expansion expenditures at
Goldstrike, Cortez and Bulyanhulu. Project capital
expenditures at Pascua-Lama increased by $129 million,
or 7%, compared to the prior year, as the decision to
temporarily suspend the project was not made until
fourth quarter 2013. Capitalized interest decreased
compared to the prior year, primarily due to the impact
of Pueblo Viejo entering commercial production in
January 2013 and due to the cessation of interest
capitalization at Pascua-Lama in fourth quarter 2013.
Finance Cost/Finance Income
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
Interest incurred
Interest capitalized
Accretion
Debt extinguishment fee
Finance costs
Finance income
2013
2012
2011
$ 796
(297)
68
90
$ 688
(567)
53
–
$ 555
(408)
52
–
$ 657
$ 174
$ 199
$
9
$ 11
$ 13
35
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Finance costs were $657 million in 2013 compared to
$174 million in the prior year. Interest costs incurred
were $796 million, up $108 million, or 16%, over the
prior year. The increase in interest costs incurred reflects
higher total debt levels compared to 2012. Interest
capitalized decreased in 2013 by $270 million compared
to 2012, primarily due to the impact of Pueblo Viejo
entering commercial production in January 2013 and
due to the cessation of interest capitalization at our
Pascua-Lama project in fourth quarter 2013.
We also incurred a $90 million loss on debt
extinguishment arising from the debt repurchase that
occurred in fourth quarter 2013.
Impairment Losses
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
Australia Pacific goodwill
Copper goodwill
Capital projects goodwill
ABG goodwill
2013
2012
2011
$ 1,200
–
1,033 $ 798
–
–
397
185
Total goodwill impairment charges
$ 2,815 $ 798
Pascua-Lama
Lumwana
Jabal Sayid
Porgera
Buzwagi
Veladero
North Mara
Reko Diq
Pierina
Exploration sites
Highland
Round Mountain
Granny Smith
Ruby Hill
Marigold
Kanowna
Plutonic
Darlot
Bald Mountain
Available for sale investments
Other
$ 6,061
–
– $ 4,982
–
–
–
–
–
120
–
169
86
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
46
93
860
746
721
464
286
–
140
112
–
78
73
66
60
41
37
36
16
26
49
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
$ 97
89
Total asset impairment charges
$ 9,872 $ 5,496
$ 186
Total impairment charges
$ 12,687 $ 6,294
$ 186
Refer to pages 55–59 for a full description of impairment
losses.
36
Income Tax
Reconciliation to Canadian Statutory Rate
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
At 26.5% statutory rate
Increase (decrease) due to:
Allowances and special tax deductions1
Impact of foreign tax rates2
Expenses not tax deductible
Goodwill impairment charges not tax deductible
Impairment charges not recognized in deferred
tax assets
Net currency translation losses on deferred
tax balances
Current year tax losses not recognized in deferred
tax assets
Pueblo Viejo SLA amendment
Non-recognition of US AMT credits
Adjustments in respect of prior years
Impact of tax rate changes
Amendment in Australia
Foreign tax assessment
Impact of functional currency changes
Other withholding taxes
Mining taxes
Other items
2013
2012
$ (2,509) $ (123)
(181)
(169)
111
837
(272)
(475)
47
322
1,699
119
49
46
183
384
48
5
–
–
–
–
64
134
(25)
72
–
–
21
(22)
(58)
(19)
16
43
175
6
Income tax expense (recovery)
$
630
$ (102)
1. We are able to claim certain allowances and tax deductions unique to
extractive industries that result in a lower effective tax rate.
2. We operate in multiple foreign tax jurisdictions that have tax rates different
than the Canadian statutory rate. Amounts in 2012 included the impact of
impairments in a high tax jurisdiction.
The more significant items impacting income tax expense
in 2013 and 2012 include the following:
Currency Translation
Deferred tax balances are subject to remeasurement for
changes in currency exchange rates each period. The
most significant balances are Argentinean deferred tax
liabilities. In 2013 and 2012, tax expense of $49 and
$46 million respectively primarily arose from translation
losses due to the weakening of the Argentinean peso
against the US dollar. These losses and gains are included
within deferred tax expense/recovery.
Pueblo Viejo Special Lease Agreement (SLA) Amendment
In third quarter 2013, the Pueblo Viejo Special Lease
Agreement (SLA) Amendment was substantively enacted.
The amendment included the following items: Elimination
of a 10 percent return embedded in the initial capital
investment for purposes of the net profits tax (NPI); An
extension of the period over which Pueblo Viejo will
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
recover its capital investment; A delay of application of
NPI deductions; A reduction of the depreciation rates;
and the establishment of a graduated minimum tax.
The tax impact of the amendment is a charge of
$384 million, comprised of current tax and deferred tax
expense, including $36 million of graduated minimum
tax related to 2012 sales proceeds.
Amendment in Australia
In fourth quarter 2012, amendments were made to prior
year tax returns for one of our Australian consolidated
tax groups, based on updated tax pool amounts from the
time of the consolidation election. These amendments
resulted in a current tax recovery of $44 million and a
deferred tax recovery of $14 million.
Non-Recognition of US Alternative Minimum Tax
(AMT) Credits
In fourth quarter 2013, we recorded a deferred tax
expense of $48 million related to US AMT credits which
are not probable to be realized based on our current
life of mine plans.
Tax Rate Changes
In second quarter 2012, a tax rate change was enacted
in the province of Ontario, Canada, resulting in a deferred
tax recovery of $11 million.
In third quarter 2012, a tax rate change was enacted
in Chile, resulting in a current tax expense of $4 million
and deferred tax recovery of $15 million.
Foreign Income Tax Assessment
In second quarter 2012, a foreign income tax assessment
was received which resulted in a current tax recovery of
$19 million.
Functional Currency Changes
In fourth quarter 2012, we received approval to prepare
certain of our Papua New Guinea tax returns using a
US dollar functional currency effective January 1, 2012.
This approval resulted in a one-time deferred tax expense
of $16 million. Going forward, the material Papua New
Guinea tax return will now be filed using a US dollar
functional currency.
Review of Operating Segments Performance
As at the end of 2013, we reorganized our operating structure as described on page 16. Barrick’s business is now
organized into ten Operating Units: five individual gold mines, two gold mine portfolios, one publicly traded gold
company, a global copper business, and one project. Barrick’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, the Chief Executive
Officer, reviews the operating results, assesses performance and makes capital allocation decisions for each of these
business operations at an Operating Unit level. Therefore, these Operating Units are operating segments for financial
reporting purposes. Segment performance is evaluated based on a number of measures including operating income
before tax, production levels and unit production costs. Income tax, corporate administration, finance income and
costs, impairment charges and reversals, investment write-downs and gains/losses on non-hedge derivatives are
managed on a consolidated basis and are therefore not reflected in segment income.
As a transitional measure, the following table provides a summary of 2013 results and most recent guidance
ranges of certain key metrics under the previous operating segment structure.
Production (millions of oz)
Adjusted operating costs ($ per oz)
All-in sustaining costs ($ per oz)
Regions
North America
South America
Australia Pacific
ABG (73.9%)
Guidance
3.55–3.70
1.25–1.35
1.70–1.85
0.40–0.45
Actual
Guidance
Actual
Guidance
3.58
1.34
1.77
0.47
475–525
475–525
800–900
925–975
497
481
725
846
750–800
875–925
1,100–1,200
1,550–1,600
Actual
798
792
1,015
1,362
Production (millions of lbs)
C1 cash costs ($ per lb)
C3 fully allocated
cash costs ($ per lb)
Copper
Guidance
520–550
Actual
Guidance
539
1.90–2.00
Actual
1.92
Guidance
2.40–2.60
Actual
2.42
37
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
A discussion of the operating results under the new
operating segment structure is provided below.
Cortez
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Total tons mined (000s)
Ore tons processed (000s)
Average grade (ozs/ton)
Gold produced (000s/oz)
Gold sold (000s/oz)
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating
costs (per oz)2
All-in sustaining
costs (per oz)2
All-in costs (per oz)2
147,718 120,203
22,045 9,870
0.076 0.150
1,337 1,370
1,371 1,346
603
$ 630 $
23% 119,021
11,502
123%
(49%) 0.136
(2%) 1,421
2%
1,416
4% $ 606
$ 222 $
233
(5%) $ 246
$ 433 $
$ 529 $
608
628
(29%) $ 437
(16%) $ 486
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
Capital expenditures
($ millions)4
Minesite sustaining
Minesite expansion
$ 1,294 $ 1,603
(19%) $ 1,606
$ 396 $
$ 264 $
$ 132 $
502
475
27
(21%) $ 325
(44%) $ 256
69
389% $
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS.
For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of
this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining as well as mine development on an accrual basis excluding
capitalized interest.
Segment income for 2013 was $1,294 million, a
decrease of $309 million, or 19%, from the prior year.
The decrease was primarily due to a lower realized gold
price combined with an increase in cost of sales. In 2013,
capital expenditures decreased by $106 million or 21%
over the prior year, primarily due to a reduction in
minesite sustaining capital expenditures.
Gold production of 1.34 million ounces for 2013
was 2% lower compared to the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to the processing of the lower grade
ore at the autoclave and roaster facilities, partially offset
by a significant increase in ore tons placed on the leach
pads. Tons mined from the open pit increased, as new
trucks were commissioned and mining moved back into
the GAP pit while we continued to mine at Cortez Hills.
In 2013, cost of sales increased by $27 million, or
4%, over the prior year, primarily due to an increase in
depreciation expense, partially offset by an increase in
capitalized production phase stripping costs and a
decrease in royalty expense due to lower gold prices.
Adjusted operating costs were $222 per ounce, down
$11 per ounce or 5% over the prior year, primarily due
to lower operating costs as a result of increased
capitalized production phase stripping costs. All-in
sustaining costs for 2013 decreased by $175 per ounce
or 29% over the prior year due to a decrease in minesite
sustaining capital expenditures, partially offset by an
increase in capitalized production phase stripping costs.
Goldrush
The Goldrush project is advancing through prefeasibility,
and a number of development options are being
considered, including open pit mining, underground
mining, or a combination of both. Drilling is currently
focused on establishing confidence in the continuity of
high grade portions of the deposit in support of the
underground development option.
These trade-off studies will provide a better
understanding of the potential of this quality asset and
the economic drivers for development, which will form
the basis of the prefeasibility study, which remains on
track for completion in mid-2015. This district is a
cornerstone of Barrick’s current and future success and is
located in a mining area well provided with significant
infrastructure and expertise.
38
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Goldstrike
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Total tons mined (000s)
Ore tons processed (000s)
Average grade (ozs/ton)
Gold produced (000s/oz)
Gold sold (000s/oz)
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating costs
96,287 110,361
8,253
7,527
0.172
0.146
1,174
892
1,175
887
$ 656 $ 730
(13%) 118,523
(9%) 7,798
(15%) 0.166
(24%) 1,088
(25%) 1,085
(10%) $ 653
(per oz)2
$ 606 $ 520
All-in sustaining costs (per oz)2 $ 901 $ 802
All-in costs (per oz)2
$ 1,153 $ 926
17% $ 512
12% $ 774
25% $ 802
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
Capital expenditures
($ millions)4
Minesite sustaining
Minesite expansion
$ 586 $ 1,233
(52%) $ 1,049
$ 474 $ 453
$ 251 $ 308
$ 223 $ 145
5% $ 305
(19%) $ 275
30
54% $
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS.
For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of
this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining as well as mine development on an accrual basis excluding
capitalized interest.
Segment income for 2013 was $586 million, a decrease
of $647 million or 52% from the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to the lower realized gold price and
lower sales volumes, partially offset by a decrease in cost
of sales. In 2013, capital expenditures increased by
$21 million, or 5%, over the prior year primarily due to
an increase in minesite expansion capital as a result of
the thiosulfate project.
Gold production of 0.89 million ounces for 2013
was 24% lower compared to the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to a reduction in the amount of ore
tons processed through the autoclave, due to construction
activities related to the thiosulfate project and the
processing of fewer ore tons at the roaster facility due
to an increase in toll ore tons processed, and lower
average head grades.
In 2013, cost of sales decreased by $74 million or
10% over the prior year, primarily due to an increase in
capitalized production phase stripping costs and a
decrease in royalty expense due to lower gold prices.
Adjusted operating costs were $606 per ounce, up
$86 per ounce, or 17%, over the prior year, primarily
due to the impact of lower sales volume on unit
production costs. All-in sustaining costs for 2013
increased $99 per ounce, or 12%, primarily reflecting
the higher adjusted operating costs.
Goldstrike thiosulfate technology project
Construction of the thiosulfate technology project,
including the retrofitting of the existing plant and the
construction of new installations, continued during the
year. This project allows for continued production from
the autoclaves and brings forward production of about
4.0 million ounces in the mine plan. First gold production
is expected in the fourth quarter 2014, with an average
annual contribution of about 350 to 450 thousand of
annual production in their first full five years of
operation. Production is anticipated to increase to above
1.0 million ounces in 2015 with a full year of operations
from the modified autoclaves. Total project costs are
expected to be about $585 million.
Pueblo Viejo
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Total tons mined (000s)
2,929
Ore tons processed (000s)
0.179
Average grade (ozs/ton)
488
Gold produced (000s/oz)
444
Gold sold (000s/oz)
$ 559
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating costs (per oz)2 $ 561
All-in sustaining costs (per oz)2
$ 735
All-in costs (per oz)2
$ 800
10,132 10,638
490
0.147
67
–
–
–
–
–
(5%)
498%
22%
628%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
Capital expenditures
($ millions)4
Minesite sustaining
Minesite expansion
Project capex
$ 424
–
–
–
$ 169
$ 121
–
$ 48
$ 949
$ 95
–
$ 854
(82%) $ 941
–
27%
–
–
(94%) $ 941
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS.
For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of
this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent our share of expenditures for minesite
expansion, minesite sustaining, mine development as well as project
development on an accrual basis excluding capitalized interest.
39
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Segment income was $424 million in 2013, the initial
year of commercial production for Pueblo Viejo. Capital
expenditures were lower by 82% compared to the prior
year, as the majority of construction was completed by
the end of 2012 and the mine achieved commercial
production in January 2013.
Gold production for 2013 was 0.49 million ounces,
which was lower than expected as a result of ongoing
modifications and repairs to the autoclave facility. These
major modifications have been completed and all four
autoclaves are online after being individually tested to
design capacity. The new 215 megawatt power plant
was commissioned on schedule in the third quarter. The
mine is now expected to reach full capacity in the first
half of 2014 following completion of de-bottlenecking
modifications to the lime circuit.
In 2013, cost of sales was $559 million, adjusted
operating costs were $561 per ounce, and all-in
sustaining costs were $735 per ounce. 2013 was the first
year these metrics were reported as a result of Pueblo
Viejo achieving commercial production in January 2013.
Lagunas Norte
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Total tons mined (000s)
Ore tons processed (000s)
0.031
Average grade (ozs/ton)
606
Gold produced (000s/oz)
591
Gold sold (000s/oz)
$ 270
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating costs (per oz)2 $ 361
All-in sustaining costs (per oz)2
$ 627
All-in costs (per oz)2
$ 627
40,713 34,421
23,246 22,634
0.037
754
734
$ 296
$ 318
$ 565
$ 565
18% 30,898
3% 21,334
0.043
(16%)
763
(20%)
759
(19%)
(9%) $ 253
$ 274
$ 454
$ 454
14%
11%
11%
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
$ 548
Capital expenditures ($ millions)4 $ 139
$ 139
Minesite sustaining
–
Minesite expansion
$ 929
$ 162
$ 162
–
(41%) $ 946
(14%) $ 123
(14%) $ 123
–
–
Segment income for 2013 was $548 million, a decrease of
$381 million or 41% from the prior year. The decrease was
primarily due to the lower realized gold price combined
with a decrease in sales volumes due to lower average ore
grade. In 2013, capital expenditures decreased by $23
million or 14% over the prior year, primarily due the
ramp-down of construction on the now commissioned
carbon-in-column plant and the Phase 5 leach pad.
Gold production of 0.6 million ounces for 2013 was
20% lower compared to the prior year. The decrease was
primarily due to the expected decline in ore grade, partially
offset by an increased mining rate, which facilitated
access to ore with improved recovery rates and enabled
the stockpiling of lower recovery ore.
In 2013, cost of sales decreased by $26 million or 9%
over the prior year, primarily due a reduction in royalties and
employee profit sharing costs as a result of lower gold
revenues. This was partially offset by higher direct mining
costs, largely due to increased wages and an increase in
cyanide prices. Adjusted operating costs were $361 per
ounce, up $43 per ounce or 14% over the prior year,
primarily due to the impact of lower production levels on unit
production costs. All-in sustaining costs for 2013 increased by
$62 per ounce or 11% over the prior year due to the same
factors affecting adjusted operating costs, partially offset by a
decrease in minesite sustaining expenditures.
Veladero
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Total tons mined (000s)
Ore tons processed (000s)
0.027
Average grade (ozs/ton)
641
Gold produced (000s/oz)
659
Gold sold (000s/oz)
$ 566
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating costs (per oz)2 $ 501
All-in sustaining costs (per oz)2
$ 833
All-in costs (per oz)2
$ 833
86,633 92,475
32,062 30,528
0.032
766
754
$ 586
$ 486
$ 760
$ 760
(6%) 97,138
5% 34,937
0.037
(16%)
957
(16%)
914
(13%)
(3%) $ 494
$ 355
$ 516
$ 516
3%
10%
10%
Summary of Financial Data
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS.
For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of
this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining as well as mine development on an accrual basis excluding
capitalized interest.
Segment income ($ millions)3
$ 306
Capital expenditures ($ millions)4 $ 208
$ 208
Minesite sustaining
–
Minesite expansion
$ 605
$ 196
$ 196
–
(49%) $ 887
$ 142
6%
$ 142
6%
–
–
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS. For
further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining as well as mine development on an accrual basis excluding
capitalized interest.
40
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Segment income for 2013 was $306 million, a decrease
of $299 million or 49% from the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to the lower realized gold price
combined with a decrease in sales volumes, partially
offset by increased silver head grades and silver recovery
rates from the Amable pit. In 2013, capital expenditures
increased by $12 million or 6% over the prior year,
primarily due to increased minesite sustaining capital
expenditures relating to a leach pad expansion.
Gold production of 0.64 million ounces for 2013
was 16% lower compared to the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to reduced head grades from mining
of Phase 3 of the Federico pit and the final phase of the
Amable pit. Tons mined decreased by 6% primarily due
to lower mobile equipment availability, with tons placed
on the leach pad increasing by 5% due to increased
primary crusher availability resulting from less
maintenance downtime. Despite an increase in tons
placed on the leach pad, production decreased due to
restrictions associated with permit conditions that are
impacting the amount of leach solution.
In 2013, cost of sales decreased by $20 million or
3% over the prior year, primarily due a reduction in
royalties due to lower revenues combined with lower
depreciation as a result of lower production levels and
the build-up of leach pad inventory. Adjusted operating
costs were $501 per ounce, up $15 per ounce or 3%
over the prior year, primarily due to the impact of lower
production levels, partially offset by increased silver
by-product credits. All-in sustaining costs for 2013
increased by $73 per ounce or 10% over the prior year
reflecting higher adjusted operating costs and an
increase in minesite sustaining expenditures relating to
the leach pad expansion.
The annual update to the LOM plan, which was
completed in fourth quarter 2013, was significantly
impacted by the lower gold price assumption as well as
the effect of sustained local inflationary pressures on
operating and capital costs. The new plan resulted in
a reduction of reserves and LOM production as the
next open pit cutback is uneconomic at current gold
prices. This resulted in a significant decrease in the
estimated fair value of the mine, and accordingly, we
recorded an impairment loss of $300 million (post-tax)
($464 million pre-tax).
North America – Other
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
167,408 166,447
31,634 41,473
0.025
0.030
883
858
894
849
$ 895 $ 862
Total tons mined (000s)
Ore tons processed (000s)
Average grade (ozs/ton)
Gold produced (000s/oz)
Gold sold (000s/oz)
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating
costs (per oz)2
$ 792 $ 743
All-in sustaining costs (per oz)2 $ 1,235 $ 1,181
All-in costs (per oz)2
$ 1,235 $ 1,181
1% 172,038
(24%) 42,126
20% 0.025
873
838
4% $ 657
(3%)
(5%)
7% $ 622
5% $ 1,088
5% $ 1,088
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
$ 281
Capital expenditures ($ millions)4 $ 341
$ 341
Minesite sustaining
–
Minesite expansion
$ 631
$ 355
$ 355
–
(55%) $ 627
(4%) $ 351
(4%) $ 351
–
–
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS.
For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of
this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining as well as mine development on an accrual basis excluding
capitalized interest.
Segment income for 2013 was $281 million, a decrease
of $350 million or 55% from the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to the lower realized gold price
combined with a decrease in sales volumes. In 2013,
capital expenditures decreased by $14 million or 4% over
the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in underground
development expenditures at Turquoise Ridge, partially
offset by increased capitalized production phase stripping
at Bald Mountain and Round Mountain.
Gold production of 0.86 million ounces for 2013
was 3% lower compared to the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to lower production at Bald Mountain
and Round Mountain, partially offset by higher
production at Ruby Hill and Turquoise Ridge.
Production at Bald Mountain decreased by 42%
over the prior year due to a decline in ore tons placed on
the leach pads as the mine went through a significant
development phase in 2013.
41
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Segment income for 2013 was $904 million, a decrease
of $282 million or 24% from the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to the lower realized gold price
combined with a decrease in sales ounces, partially offset
by a reduction in cost of sales. In 2013, capital
expenditures decreased by $125 million or 22% over the
prior year, primarily due to decreased minesite sustaining
capital expenditures across all sites, partially offset by an
increase in capitalized production phase stripping costs
at Porgera, Cowal and KCGM.
Gold production of 1.77 million ounces for 2013
was 3% lower compared to the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to the disposal of the Yilgarn South
assets at the end of third quarter 2013, partially offset by
higher production at Porgera and Cowal.
Production at Porgera increased by 11% over the
prior year due to increased throughput and grade and
as a result of fewer operational disruptions at site
compared to 2012. Although production increased at
Porgera, we revised the mine plan to focus on the
higher grade underground ore and, as a result, recorded
a non-current asset impairment loss of $595 million
(post-tax) ($746 million pre-tax) in fourth quarter 2013.
Production at Cowal increased by 11% over the prior
year, primarily due to the mining of higher grade ore.
In 2013, cost of sales decreased by $271 million or
14% over the prior year. The decrease was primarily due
to the disposal of the Yilgarn South assets combined
with lower direct operating costs as a result of cost
saving initiatives adopted throughout the segment,
particularly with respect to power, consumables, and
contract labor as well as the impact of a decrease in
our effective Australian dollar exchange rate. Adjusted
operating costs were $725 per ounce, down $68 per
ounce or 9% over the prior year, primarily due to a
reduction in cost of sales and the disposal of the Yilgarn
South assets. All-in sustaining costs for 2013 decreased
by $134 per ounce or 12% over the prior year, reflecting
lower adjusted operating costs and a decrease in
minesite sustaining capital expenditures.
Production at Turquoise Ridge increased by 16%
over the prior year due to an increase in ore tons mined.
Production at Ruby Hill increased 122% over the prior
year due to increased grade as a result of a change in the
mine sequencing plan, partially offset by a decrease in
ore tons mined.
In 2013, cost of sales increased by $33 million or
4% over the prior year, primarily due an increase in
depreciation expense, partially offset by an increase in
capitalized production phase stripping expenditures at
Bald Mountain and lower royalty expense at Hemlo and
Bald Mountain due to lower gold prices. Adjusted
operating costs were $792 per ounce, up $49 per ounce
or 7% over the prior year, primarily due to the impact
of lower production levels on unit production costs. All-in
sustaining costs for 2013 increased by $54 per ounce or
5% over the prior year reflecting higher adjusted operating
costs and an increase in capitalized production phase
stripping expenditures.
Australia Pacific
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
97,211 104,126
26,879
25,807
0.078
0.079
1,822
1,773
1,798
1,828
$ 1,675 $ 1,946
Total tons mined (000s)
Ore tons processed (000s)
Average grade (ozs/ton)
Gold produced (000s/oz)
Gold sold (000s/oz)
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating
costs (per oz)2
$ 725 $ 793
All-in sustaining costs (per oz)2 $ 994 $ 1,128
All-in costs (per oz)2
$ 994 $ 1,128
(7%) 112,129
(4%) 26,461
1% 0.083
(3%) 1,879
(2%) 1,864
(14%) $ 1,610
(9%) $ 623
(12%) $ 907
(12%) $ 907
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
Capital expenditures
($ millions)4
Minesite sustaining
Minesite expansion
$ 904 $ 1,186
(24%) $ 1,414
$ 438 $ 563
$ 438 $ 563
–
–
(22%) $ 457
(22%) $ 457
–
–
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS.
For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of
this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining as well as mine development on an accrual basis excluding
capitalized interest.
42
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
African Barrick Gold
100% basis
Summary of Operating Data
mainly due to increased throughput due to improved
operational efficiencies at the plant, partially offset by
slightly lower grades.
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Production at Bulyanhulu decreased by 16% over
8,795
0.084
641
650
59,635 52,951
8,484
0.081
627
609
$ 740 $ 794
Total tons mined (000s)
Ore tons processed (000s)
Average grade (ozs/ton)
Gold produced (000s/oz)
Gold sold (000s/oz)
Cost of sales ($ millions)
Adjusted operating
costs (per oz)2
$ 846 $ 958
All-in sustaining costs (per oz)2 $ 1,362 $ 1,585
All-in costs (per oz)2
$ 1,535 $ 1,645
13% 49,662
4% 8,168
4% 0.096
689
2%
700
7%
(7%) $ 700
(12%) $ 699
(14%) $ 1,126
(7%) $ 1,143
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
Capital expenditures
($ millions)4
Minesite sustaining
Minesite expansion
$ 120
$ 221
(46%) $ 447
$ 385
$ 272
$ 113
$ 323
$ 287
$ 36
19%
$ 304
(5%) $ 297
7
$
214%
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
in 2013.
2. Adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are non-GAAP
financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS.
For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of
this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining as well as mine development on an accrual basis excluding
capitalized interest.
Segment income for 2013 was $120 million, a decrease
of $101 million or 46% from the prior year. The decrease
was primarily due to the lower realized gold price,
partially offset by a reduction in cost of sales. In 2013,
capital expenditures increased by $62 million or 19%
over the prior year, primarily due to higher minesite
expansion capital expenditures at Bulyanhulu related to
the CIL expansion project, partially offset by lower
sustaining capital expenditures across all sites.
Gold production of 0.64 million ounces (Barrick’s
share 0.47 million ounces) for 2013 was 2% higher
compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily
due to higher production at North Mara and Buzwagi,
partially offset by lower production at Bulyanhulu.
Production at North Mara increased by 33% over the
prior year, mainly as a result of mining increased ore tons
at higher grades due to the opening of higher grade
areas of the pit due to the waste stripping program that
was undertaken earlier in 2013. Production at Buzwagi
increased by 9% over the prior year. The increase was
the prior year, primarily due to mining equipment
availability issues and reduced access to stopes, which
had a negative impact on tons mined. Production at
Tulawaka decreased compared to the prior year as
mining operations came to an end in first half of 2013.
In 2013, cost of sales decreased by $54 million or
7% over the prior year. The decrease was primarily due
to lower direct operating costs as a result of decreased
labor and maintenance costs, and increased capitalized
production phase stripping costs at Buzwagi and North
Mara. Adjusted operating costs were $846 per ounce,
down $112 per ounce or 12% over the prior year,
reflecting the same factors impacting cost of sales, in
addition to the benefit of higher production levels on
unit production costs. All-in sustaining costs for 2013
decreased by $223 per ounce or 14% over the prior year,
reflecting lower adjusted operating costs and a decrease
in minesite sustaining capital expenditures at Bulyanhulu
and at Buzwagi.
Global Copper
Summary of Operating Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Copper produced (millions of lbs)
Copper sold (millions of lbs)
Cost of sales ($ millions)
C1 cash costs (per lb)2
C3 fully allocated
costs (per lb)2
539
519
468
472
$ 1,091 $ 1,227
$ 1.92 $ 2.05
$ 2.42 $ 2.85
451
15%
10%
444
(11%) $ 915
(6%) $ 1.71
(15%) $ 2.30
Summary of Financial Data
For the years ended December 31
2013
20121 % Change
2011
Segment income ($ millions)3
Capital expenditures
($ millions)4
Minesite sustaining
Minesite expansion
Project capex
$ 485
$ 392
24%
$ 690
$ 405
$ 342
–
$ 63
$ 741
$ 555
–
$ 186
(45%) $ 377
(38%) $ 259
–
(66%) $ 118
–
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
in 2013.
2. C1 cash costs and C3 fully allocated costs are non-GAAP financial
performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further
information and a detailed reconciliation, please see page 63 of this MD&A.
3. Segment income excludes income taxes.
4. Amounts presented represent expenditures for minesite expansion, minesite
sustaining, mine development as well as project development on an accrual
basis excluding capitalized interest.
43
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Segment income for 2013 was $485 million, an increase
of $93 million or 24% over the prior year. The increase
was the result of higher copper sales volumes combined
with lower production costs at Lumwana, which more
than offset the lower copper realized price and higher
production costs at Zaldívar, as well as $52 million in
project care and maintenance costs incurred at Jabal
Sayid. In 2013, capital expenditures were lower by
$336 million or 45% compared to the prior year,
reflecting lower capital expenditures at Lumwana as
development of the Chimiwungo South pit is complete
and lower capital expenditures at Jabal Sayid as the
process infrastructure construction is now complete.
In 2013, copper production was 539 million pounds,
15% higher than the prior year. Production at Lumwana
increased by 45% primarily due to higher mill throughput
and the processing of higher grade ore at higher
recoveries. Production at Zaldívar decreased by 3% in
2013 mainly due to lower production from the heap
leach as a result of lower sulfide recoveries.
In 2013, cost of sales were $136 million, or 11%,
lower than the prior year, primarily due to lower
production costs at Lumwana resulting from the
termination of one of the mining contractors and lower
depreciation expense as a result of the impairment
charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012. C1 cash
costs for 2013 were $1.92 per pound, down $0.13 per
pound or 6% from the prior year. The decrease is
primarily due to the reduction in costs at Lumwana and
lower fuel and sulfuric acid prices at Zaldívar. C3 fully
allocated costs per pound for 2013 were $2.42 per
pound, down $0.43 per pound or 15% from the prior
year, primarily reflecting the effect of the above factors
on C1 cash costs, together with the impact of lower
depreciation expense at Lumwana due to the impairment
loss recorded in fourth quarter 2012.
Copper reserves increased slightly to 14.0 billion
pounds based on a copper price assumption of $3.00 per
pound. Measured and indicated copper resources
decreased to 6.9 billion pounds from 10.3 billion pounds
at the end of 2012 based on a copper price assumption
of $3.50 per pound, primarily as a result of further
optimization of the Lumwana mine plan. Inferred copper
resources decreased to 0.2 billion pounds from 0.5 billion
pounds at the end of 2012.
Jabal Sayid
In 2013, $45 million was invested in the HCIS compliance
project which includes the installation of safety and
security infrastructure. While this work is progressing, the
44
number of employees at site has been reduced to
minimize costs until approval to commence operations is
received. Management used the opportunity to study
alternate hauling/hoisting options from the underground
mine with the goal of improving LOM cash flow when it
comes into production.
Once Jabal Sayid comes into production, the average
annual copper output in concentrate is expected to be
100 to 130 million pounds at C1 cash costs of $1.50 to
$1.70 per pound in its first full five years of operation.
Since the Company acquired its interest in the Jabal
Sayid project through its acquisition of Equinox Minerals
in 2011, the Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources
(“DMMR”), which oversees the mining license, has
questioned whether such change in the indirect ownership
of the project, as well as previous changes in ownership,
required the prior consent of DMMR. We are progressing
discussions with DMMR to try to resolve this situation.
Should this not be successful, alternatives such as further
curtailing or suspending activities on site until a
resolution is achieved, are being studied and could lead
to further impairment losses on the value of the asset.
Other early stage projects
Donlin Gold
Under our disciplined capital allocation framework, we
continue to monitor the long-term viability of our 50%
investment in Donlin Gold. Although the Donlin Gold
project contains large, long life mineral resources, with
significant leverage to the price of gold, it is uncertain
when or if it will be able to meet our investment criteria
given the required large initial capital investment. In
2014, the majority of the expenditures will be focused
on advancing the permitting of the project.
Cerro Casale
At the Cerro Casale project in Chile, of which we own
75%, approval of the Environmental Impact Assessment
was received in January 2013 from the Servicio de
Evaluacion Ambiental, the environmental authority of
northern Chile. Cerro Casale, on a 100 percent basis,
has total proven and probable gold and copper mineral
reserves of 23 million ounces of gold and 5.8 billion
pounds of copper. We have minimized our 2014 budget
for the project, however we will continue to explore
alternative development options for this project, which is
located in a high potential district, as well as continuing
the process of obtaining necessary rights of way.
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Financial Condition Review
Summary Balance Sheet and Key Financial Ratios1
($ millions, except ratios and share amounts)
As at December 31
Total cash and equivalents
Current assets
Non-current assets
Total Assets
Current liabilities excluding short-term debt
Non-current liabilities excluding long-term debt
Debt
Total Liabilities
Total shareholders’ equity
Non-controlling interests
Total Equity
Dividends
Total common shares outstanding (millions of shares)3
Key Financial Ratios:
Current ratio4
Debt-to-equity5
Debt-to-total capitalization6
Adjusted return on equity7
2013
20122
$ 2,424
3,588
31,436
$ 2,097
3,660
41,721
$ 37,448
$ 47,478
$ 2,626
5,741
13,080
$ 2,569
6,330
13,943
$ 21,447
$ 22,842
$ 13,533
2,468
$ 21,972
2,664
$ 16,001
$ 24,636
$
508
1,165
$
750
1,001
2.14:1
0.82:1
0.39:1
14%
1.30:1
0.57:1
0.46:1
17%
1. Figures include assets and liabilities classified as held-for-sale as at December 31, 2013.
2. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
3. Total common shares outstanding do not include 6.4 million stock options. The increase from December 31, 2012 is due to the equity offering in November 2013
and the exercise of stock options.
4. Represents current assets divided by current liabilities (including short-term debt) as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
5. Represents debt divided by total shareholders’ equity (including minority interest) as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
6. Represents debt divided by capital stock and long-term debt as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
7. Represents adjusted net earnings divided by average shareholders’ equity as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Balance Sheet Review
Total assets were $37 billion at December 31, 2013,
a decrease of $10 billion, or 21%, compared to
December 31, 2012. The decrease primarily reflects
impairments against the carrying value of non-current
assets, including $6.0 billion (post-tax) (pre-tax $6.1 billion)
against our Pascua-Lama project and $2.8 billion in
goodwill impairments in our global copper, Australian
Pacific, Capital Projects and African Barrick Gold
segments. Our asset base is primarily comprised of
non-current assets such as property, plant and equipment
and goodwill, reflecting the capital intensive nature of
the mining business and our history of growing through
acquisitions. Other significant assets include production
inventories and cash and equivalents. We typically do
not carry a material accounts receivable balance, since
only sales of concentrate and copper cathode have a
settlement period.
Total liabilities decreased by $1.4 billion or 6%
compared to December 31, 2012, largely due to a net
decrease in debt of $0.9 billion.
Shareholders’ Equity
As at February 11, 2014
Common shares
Stock options
Number of shares
1,164,652,426
6,430,448
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income or
loss, together with certain other economic gains and
losses, which, collectively, are described as “other
comprehensive income” or “OCI”, and excluded from
the income statement.
45
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For 2013, other comprehensive income was a loss of
$508 million on an after-tax basis. The loss reflected
losses of $56 million on hedge contracts designated for
future periods, caused primarily by changes in currency
exchange rates, copper prices, and fuel prices,
reclassification adjustments totaling $398 million for
gains on hedge contracts designated for 2013 (or
ineffective amounts) that were transferred to earnings
or PPE in conjunction with the recognition of the related
hedge exposure, $74 million of losses recorded as a
result of changes in the fair value of investments held
during the year, $6 million of gains realized on sale
of investments, and $93 million in losses for currency
translation adjustments; partially offset by $26 million
of losses transferred to earnings related to impaired
investments; $37 million actuarial gains on pension
liability and a $56 million gain due to tax recoveries
on the overall decrease in OCI.
Included in accumulated other comprehensive
income at December 31, 2013 were unrealized pre-tax
gains on currency, commodity and interest rate hedge
contracts totaling $39 million. The balance primarily
relates to currency hedge contracts that are designated
against operating costs and capital expenditures,
primarily over the next three years including $87 million
remaining in crystallized hedge gains related to our
Australian dollar contracts that were settled in the third
quarter of 2012 or closed out in the second half of 2013,
$21 million in crystallized hedge gains related to our
silver contracts as well as $9 million in crystallized hedge
gains related to our Chilean peso contracts that were
settled in the second quarter of 2013. These hedge
gains/losses are expected to be recorded in earnings at
the same time the corresponding hedged operating
costs/depreciation are recorded in earnings.
Financial Position and Liquidity
Our capital structure comprises a mix of debt and
shareholders’ equity. As at December 31, 2013, our total
debt was $13.1 billion (debt net of cash and equivalents
was $10.7 billion) and our debt-to-equity ratio and
debt-to-total capitalization ratios were 0.82:1 and
0.39:1, respectively. This compares to debt as at
December 31, 2012 of $13.9 billion (debt net of cash
and equivalents was $11.8 billion), and debt-to-equity
and debt-to-total capitalization ratios of 0.57:1 and
0.46:1, respectively.
46
In 2013, we made a number of changes to our
capital structure. In first quarter 2013, we drew $2.0 billion
on our $4.0 billion revolving credit facility (“2012 Credit
Facility”), using the proceeds to repay $1.2 billion on our
$1.45 billion credit facility, which expired in April 2013.
In second quarter 2013, we issued $3.0 billion of debt,
using $2.0 billion of the net proceeds to repay the
outstanding balance on the 2012 Credit Facility. In fourth
quarter 2013, we completed an equity offering for net
proceeds of $2.9 billion, using $2.6 billion of those
proceeds to redeem and repurchase outstanding debt
with near-term maturities. The net effect of these
transactions was to repay all amounts outstanding under
our credit facilities and significantly reduce other near-
term debt maturities. As a result, there is only
approximately $300 million of debt maturing in the next
two years and a total of approximately $1 billion due in
the next four years (refer to note 18 for further details).
The $4.0 billion 2012 Credit Facility was fully undrawn at
year end. During fourth quarter 2013, the termination
date was extended by one year such that the facility now
expires in January 2019.
REPAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL SCHEDULE1 (USD millions)
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024+
1. Amounts include 60% of the Pueblo Viejo financing and 100%
of the ABG financing.
90
81
72
63
54
45
36
27
18
9
0
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS At current market gold and copper prices, we expect to
generate negative free cash flow in 2014. This is primarily
due to expected full year total capital expenditures of
about $2.4 to $2.7 billion. We anticipate total cash
outflows related to our Pascua-Lama project to be about
$700 million in 2014, including about $75 million of
capital expenditures and the drawdown of amounts
accrued for at the end of 2013.
As part of our disciplined capital allocation strategy,
we are constantly evaluating our capital expenditures
and making reductions where the risk-adjusted returns
do not justify the investment. Since the beginning of
2013, we have also made divestments of non-core assets
and assets that do not meet our investment criteria, such
as the sale of our oil & gas business and certain of our
Australian assets, for aggregate cash proceeds of
approximately $565 million and we are anticipating
receiving aggregate cash proceeds of approximately
$153 million in connection with our announced sales
of Kanowna and Marigold. In July 2013, the Company’s
Board of Directors authorized reducing the quarterly
dividend to $0.05 per share as a further step to
improve liquidity4.
Our primary source of liquidity is our operating cash
flow, which is dependent on the ability of our operations
to deliver projected future cash flows. Other options
to enhance liquidity include drawing the $4.0 billion
available under our 2012 Credit Facility (subject to
compliance with covenants and the making of certain
representations and warranties, this facility is available
for drawdown as a source of financing), further asset
sales and issuances of debt or equity securities in the
public markets or to private investors, which could be
undertaken for liquidity enhancement and/or in connection
with establishing a strategic partnership. Many factors,
including but not limited to, general market conditions
and then prevailing metals prices could impact our ability
to issue securities on acceptable terms, as could our
credit ratings. Moody’s and S&P rate our long-term debt
Baa2 and BBB, respectively. On January 8, 2014, Moody’s
announced that it had lowered its forward view for the
average prices of gold and silver in 2014 and beyond to
$1,100 per ounce and $18 per ounce, respectively. The
rating agency had previously assumed the price of gold
and silver would average $1,200 per ounce and $20
per ounce, respectively, over the next couple of years.
Changes in our ratings could affect the trading prices
of our securities and our cost of capital. If we were to
borrow under our 2012 Credit Facility, the applicable
interest rate on the amounts borrowed would be based,
in part, on our credit ratings at the time. The key
financial covenant in the 2012 Credit Facility (undrawn
as at December 31, 2013) requires Barrick to maintain a
consolidated tangible net worth (“CTNW”) of at least
$3.0 billion (Barrick’s CTNW was $7.1 billion as at
December 31, 2013).
Cash and equivalents and cash flow
Total cash and cash equivalents as at December 31,
2013 were $2.4 billion5. At year end, our cash position
consisted of a mix of term deposits, treasury bills and
money market investments. Our cash position is primarily
denominated in US dollars.
Of total cash and cash equivalents as of December 31,
2013, $305 million was held in subsidiaries which have
regulatory regulations, contractual restrictions or operate
in countries where exchange controls and other legal
restrictions apply and are therefore not available for
general use by the Company. In addition, $936 million of
cash and equivalents is held in subsidiaries where we
have determined the cash is reinvested, for the foreseeable
future for the calculation of deferred income tax.
4. The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Board
of Directors and will depend on the Company’s financial results, cash
requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by
the Board.
5. Includes $282 million cash held at ABG, which may not be readily deployed
outside ABG.
47
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS In 2013, we generated $4.2 billion in operating cash
flow, compared to $6.0 billion of operating cash flow in
2012. The decrease in operating cash flow primarily
reflects lower net earnings levels, primarily due to lower
realized gold prices, partially offset by a decrease in
income tax payments of $350 million. The most
significant driver of the change in operating cash flow is
market gold and copper prices. The ability of our
operations to deliver projected future cash flows within
the parameters of a reduced production profile, as well
as future changes in gold and copper market prices,
either favorable or unfavorable, will continue to have a
material impact on our cash flow and liquidity as could
other risk factors described on page 17. The principal
uses of operating cash flow are to fund our capital
expenditures, interest and dividend payments.
Cash used in investing activities amounted to
$5.2 billion for 2013, a decrease of $1.8 billion compared
to the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in capital
expenditures. In 2013, capital expenditures on a cash
basis were $5.5 billion, a decrease of $1.3 billion
compared to the prior year. The decrease is primarily due
to decreased sustaining capital expenditures at Cortez
and Lumwana, part of our global initiatives to reduce
sustaining capital, and lower project capital expenditures;
partially offset by an increase in minesite expansion
expenditures at Cortez, Goldstrike and Bulyanhulu.
Summary of Cash Inflow (Outflow)
($ millions)
For the years ended December 31
Operating inflows
Investing activities
Capital Expenditures2
Divestitures
Other
2013
20121
$ 4,239
$ 5,983
$ (5,501)
522
(258)
$ (6,773)
–
(292)
Total investing outflows
$ (5,237)
$ (7,065)
Financing activities
Net change in debt
Dividends
Funding from non-controlling interests
Net proceeds from equity issuance
Other
$
(998)
(508)
55
2,910
(117)
$
607
(750)
505
–
61
Total financing (outflows) inflows
$ 1,342
$
423
Effect of exchange rate
(17)
7
Increase/(decrease) in cash and equivalent $
327
$
(652)
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted
in 2013.
2. The amounts include capitalized interest of $394 million for the year ended
December 31, 2013 (2012: $548 million).
In 2013, financing activities primarily reflects net proceeds
of $2.9 billion from an equity offering in fourth quarter
2013 and debt proceeds of $5.4 billion, partially offset
by debt repayments of $6.4 billion and dividend
payments of $508 million, resulting in a net financing
cash inflow of $1.3 billion. This compares to a net
financing cash inflow for 2012 of $423 million, which
primarily consists of $2.0 billion in debt securities,
$505 million in funding received from non-controlling
interests, partially offset by $1.4 billion of debt
repayments and dividend payments of $750 million.
48
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Summary of Financial Instruments
As at December 31, 2013
Financial
Instrument
Cash and equivalents
Accounts receivable
Available-for-sale securities
Accounts payable
Debt
Restricted share units
Deferred share units
Derivative instruments – currency contracts
Derivative instruments – copper contracts
Principal/
Notional Amount
Associated
Risks
n Interest rate
$ 2,424 million
n Credit
n Credit
$ 396 million
n Market
n Market
$ 120 million
n Liquidity
$ 2,231 million
n Liquidity
$ 13,207 million
n Interest rate
$ 30 million
n Market
$ 5 million
n Market
CAD
CLP
AUD
PGK
ZAR
415 million
159,750 million
638 million
32 million
1,348 million
n Credit
n Market/liquidity
n Interest rate
260 million lbs
n Market/liquidity
n Credit
n Interest rate
Derivative instruments – energy contracts
Diesel
8 million bbls
n Market/liquidity
n Credit
n Interest rate
Derivative instruments – interest rate contracts
Receive float interest rate swaps $ 142 million
n Market/liquidity
Receive fixed interest rate swaps $ 300 million
n Interest rate
Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation and Claims
We are currently subject to various litigation as disclosed
in note 35 to the consolidated financial statements, and
we may be involved in disputes with other parties in the
future that may result in litigation. If we are unable to
resolve these disputes favorably, it may have a material
adverse impact on our financial condition, cash flow and
results of operations.
49
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
($ millions)
As at December 31
Debt1
Repayment of principal
Capital leases
Interest
Provisions for environmental rehabilitation2
Operating leases
Restricted share units
Pension benefits and other post-retirement benefits
Derivative liabilities3
Purchase obligations for supplies and consumables4
Capital commitments5
Social development costs6
Payments due
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019 and
thereafter
Total
$ 141
38
666
136
26
16
22
32
471
242
55
$ 257
45
665
71
32
11
22
43
314
1
27
$
661
39
653
132
27
–
21
28
98
1
27
$
127
35
626
119
24
–
21
2
73
1
27
$ 878
28
615
111
23
–
21
1
74
1
7
$ 10,904
54
6,984
2,006
101
–
387
–
191
3
55
$ 12,968
239
10,209
2,575
233
27
494
106
1,221
249
198
Total
$ 1,845
$ 1,488
$ 1,687
$ 1,055
$ 1,759
$ 20,685
$ 28,519
1. Debt and Interest – Our debt obligations do not include any subjective acceleration clauses or other clauses that enable the holder of the debt to call for early
repayment, except in the event that we breach any of the terms and conditions of the debt or for other customary events of default. The debt and interest amounts
include 100% of the Pueblo Viejo financing, even though we have only guaranteed our 60% share. We are not required to post any collateral under any debt
obligations. Projected interest payments on variable rate debt were based on interest rates in effect at December 31, 2013. Interest is calculated on our long-term
debt obligations using both fixed and variable rates.
2. Provisions for Environmental Rehabilitation – Amounts presented in the table represent the undiscounted uninflated future payments for the expected cost of
provisions for environmental rehabilitation.
3. Derivative Liabilities – Amounts presented in the table relate to derivative contracts disclosed under note 24 to the consolidated financial statements. Payments
related to derivative contracts cannot be reasonably estimated given variable market conditions.
4. Purchase Obligations for Supplies and Consumables – Includes commitments related to new purchase obligations to secure a supply of acid, tires and cyanide for
our production process.
5. Capital Commitments – Purchase obligations for capital expenditures include only those items where binding commitments have been entered into.
6. Social Development Costs – Includes Pascua-Lama’s commitment related to the potential funding of a power transmission line in Argentina of $97 million, expected
to be paid over the period of 2014 to 2017.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.
Internal control over financial reporting is a framework
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with IFRS. The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting
framework includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in accordance with IFRS, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Company’s assets that could have a material effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Disclosure controls and procedures form a broader
framework designed to ensure that other financial
information disclosed publicly fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company for the
periods presented in this MD&A and Barrick’s Annual
Report. The Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures framework includes processes designed to
ensure that material information relating to the
Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to management by others within those entities to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Together, the internal control over financial reporting
and disclosure controls and procedures frameworks
provide internal control over financial reporting and
disclosure. Due to its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure may not prevent
or detect all misstatements. Further, the effectiveness of
50
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
internal control is subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures may change.
The management of Barrick, at the direction of
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of internal control over financial reporting as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on the
framework and criteria established in Internal Control
– Integrated Framework (1992) as issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of
the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation,
Management concluded that the company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2013.
Review of Quarterly Results
Quarterly Information1
Barrick’s annual management report on internal
control over financial reporting and the integrated
audit report of Barrick’s auditors for the year ended
December 31, 2013 will be included in Barrick’s 2013
Annual Report and its 2013 Form 40-F/Annual
Information Form on file with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Canadian provincial
securities regulatory authorities.
As described on page 16 of this report, we
announced a change to our organization structure.
Management will continue to monitor the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting and
disclosure controls and may make modifications from
time to time as considered necessary or desirable.
($ millions, except where indicated)
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
2013
20122
Revenues
Realized price per ounce – gold4
Realized price per pound – copper4
Cost of sales
Net earnings (loss)
Per share (dollars)3
Adjusted net earnings4
Per share (dollars)3,4
Operating cash flow
Adjusted operating cash flow4
$ 2,926 $ 2,985 $ 3,201 $ 3,437
1,629
3.56
1,844
847
0.85
923
0.92
1,085
$ 1,085 $ 1,300 $ 804 $ 1,158
1,411
3.28
1,832
(8,555)
(8.55)
663
0.66
896
1,323
3.40
1,788
172
0.17
577
0.58
1,231
1,272
3.34
1,813
(2,830)
(2.61)
406
0.37
1,016
$ 4,149 $ 3,399 $ 3,244 $ 3,644
1,691
3.78
1,753
1,039
1.04
1,096
1.10
1,374
$ 919 $ 1,476
1,655
3.52
1,733
649
0.65
880
0.88
1,845
$ 1,925 $ 1,395
1,608
3.45
1,729
787
0.79
821
0.82
919
1,714
3.54
2,124
(3,013)
(3.01)
1,157
1.16
1,845
1. Sum of all the quarters may not add up to the annual total due to rounding.
2. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
3. Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.
4. Realized price, adjusted net earnings, adjusted EPS and adjusted operating cash flow are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standard meaning
under IFRS. For further information and a detailed reconciliation, please see pages 60–69 of this MD&A.
Until the past several quarters, our financial results
reflected a trend of spot gold prices at historically
elevated levels, offset by increasing gold and copper
production costs, mainly caused by inflationary pressures.
In recent quarters, as a result of a renewed emphasis on
cost control and maximizing free cash flow, costs have
decreased. Our adjusted net earnings and adjusted
operating cash flow levels have fluctuated with gold and
copper realized prices and production levels each quarter.
In fourth quarter 2013, we recorded asset and goodwill
impairment charges totaling $2.8 billion (net of tax and
non-controlling interest), primarily at Pascua-Lama,
Porgera, Veladero and goodwill related to our Australia
Pacific segment. The net loss in second quarter 2013
reflected asset and goodwill impairment charges totaling
$8.7 billion (net of tax and non-controlling interest
effects), primarily at Pascua-Lama, Buzwagi, Jabal Sayid
and goodwill related to our global copper, Australia
Pacific and Capital Projects segments. The net loss in
fourth quarter 2012 reflected impairment charges at
Lumwana and goodwill related to our global copper
segment totaling $4.2 billion (net of tax effects).
51
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Fourth Quarter Results
In fourth quarter 2013, we reported a net loss and
adjusted net earnings of $2,830 million and $406 million,
respectively, compared to a net loss and adjusted net
earnings of $3,013 million and $1,157 million,
respectively, in fourth quarter 2012.
The decrease in the net loss was largely driven by the
impact of the impairment charges of $2.8 billion (net of
tax effects) recorded in fourth quarter 2013 compared to
$4.2 billion (net of tax effects) recorded in fourth quarter
2012. It also reflects lower realized gold and copper
prices as well as decreased gold and copper sales
volumes, partially offset by lower cost of sales applicable
to gold and copper and lower income tax expense.
The decrease in adjusted net earnings reflects the same
factors affecting the net loss with the exception of
impairment charges.
In fourth quarter 2013, we sold 1.83 million ounces
of gold and 134 million pounds of copper, compared
to 2.03 million ounces of gold and 154 million pounds of
copper in fourth quarter 2012. Revenues in fourth
quarter 2013 were lower than the same prior year period
reflecting lower market prices for gold and copper and
lower gold and copper sales volumes. In fourth quarter
2013, cost of sales was $1.81 billion, a decrease of
$311 million compared to the same prior year period,
reflecting lower direct mining costs and lower
depreciation expense resulting from the impairment
charges recorded in fourth quarter 2012. Adjusted
operating costs were $573 per ounce, an increase of
$26 per ounce, primarily due to lower production levels,
partially offset by lower direct mining costs. C1 cash
costs were $1.81 per pound for copper, a decrease of
$0.12 per pound from the same prior year period due to
lower direct mining costs at Lumwana.
In fourth quarter 2013, operating cash flow was
$1,016 million, down 45% from the same prior year
period. Adjusted operating cash flow for the fourth
quarter 2013 was $1,085 million, down 44% from the
same prior year period. The decrease in operating cash
flow and adjusted operating cash flow primarily reflects
lower realized gold and copper prices and an increase
in income tax payments, partially offset by higher
net earnings.
IFRS Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates
Management has discussed the development and
selection of our critical accounting estimates with the
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and the
Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosure relating to
such estimates in conjunction with its review of this
MD&A. The accounting policies and methods we utilize
determine how we report our financial condition and
results of operations, and they may require management
to make estimates or rely on assumptions about matters
that are inherently uncertain. The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
(“IASB”) under the historical cost convention, as
modified by revaluation of certain financial assets,
derivative contracts and post-retirement assets. Our
significant accounting policies are disclosed in note 2
of the Financial Statements. The policies applied in
the Financial Statements are based on IFRSs in effect
as at December 31, 2013. The consolidated financial
statements were approved by the Board of Directors
on February 12, 2014.
Changes in Accounting Policies
The Company has adopted the following new standards,
along with any consequential amendments, effective
January 1, 2013. These changes were made in
accordance with the applicable transitional provisions
and a summary of the impact of these changes is
disclosed in note 2(y) of the Financial Statements.
Future Accounting Policy Changes
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
In November 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9 Financial
Instruments as the first step in its project to replace IAS 39
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
IFRS 9 retains but simplifies the mixed measurement
model and establishes two primary measurement
categories for financial assets: amortized cost and fair
value. The basis of classification depends on an entity’s
business model and the contractual cash flows of the
financial asset. Classification is made at the time the
financial asset is initially recognized, namely when the
entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of
the instrument. Requirements for classification and
52
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS measurement of financial liabilities were added in
October 2010 and they largely carried forward existing
requirements in IAS 39, except that fair value changes
due to an entity’s own credit risk for liabilities designated
at fair value through profit and loss would generally be
recorded in OCI rather than the income statement.
IFRS 9 amends some of the requirements of IFRS 7
Financial Instruments: Disclosures, including added
disclosures about investments in equity instruments
measured at fair value in OCI, and guidance on financial
liabilities and derecognition of financial instruments. In
December 2011, amendments to IFRS 7 were issued to
require additional disclosures on transition from IAS 39
to IFRS 9. In November 2013, IFRS 9 was amended to
include guidance on hedge accounting and to allow
entities to early adopt the requirement to recognize
changes in fair value attributable to changes in an entity’s
own credit risk, from financial liabilities designated under
the fair value option, in OCI (without having to adopt the
remainder of IFRS 9). In July 2013, the IASB tentatively
decided to defer the mandatory effective date of IFRS 9.
The IASB agreed that the mandatory effective date
should no longer be annual periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2015 but rather be left open pending
the finalization of the impairment and classification and
measurement requirements. We are currently assessing
the impact of adopting IFRS 9 on our consolidated
financial statements.
IFRIC 21 Levies
In May 2013, IASB issued IFRIC 21 Levies, which sets
out the accounting for an obligation to pay a levy that is
not income tax. The interpretation addresses what the
obligating event is that gives rise to pay a levy and when
should a liability be recognized. We are currently
assessing the impact of adopting IFRIC 21 on our
consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
Certain accounting estimates have been identified as
being “critical” to the presentation of our financial
condition and results of operations because they require
us to make subjective and/or complex judgments about
matters that are inherently uncertain; or there is a
reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts
could be reported under different conditions or using
different assumptions and estimates.
Life of mine (“LOM”) estimates used to measure
depreciation of property, plant and equipment
We depreciate our assets over their useful life, or over
the remaining life of the mine (if shorter). We use the
units-of-production basis (“UOP”) to depreciate
the mining interest component of PP&E whereby the
denominator is the expected mineral production based
on our LOM plans. LOM plans are prepared based on
estimates of ounces of gold/pounds of copper in proven
and probable reserves and the portion of resources
considered probable of economic extraction. At the end
of each fiscal year, as part of our business cycle, we
update our LOM plans and prepare estimates of proven
and probable gold and copper mineral reserves as well
as measured, indicated and inferred mineral resources
for each mineral property. We prospectively revise
calculations of depreciation based on these updated
LOM plans. As at December 31, 2013, we have used a
gold price of $1,100 per ounce to calculate our gold
reserves, which is a decrease from $1,500 used as at
December 31, 2012. This led to a decrease in the
estimated ounces of production in our LOM plans and
is the primary driver of an expected increase of about
$225 million or 15% in 2014 depreciation expense
related to our gold segments (refer to page 22 for per
ounce 2014 guidance amounts).
Provisions for environmental rehabilitations (“PERs”)
We have an obligation to reclaim our mining properties
after the minerals have been mined from the site, and
have estimated the costs necessary to comply with
existing reclamation standards. We recognize the fair
value of a liability for a PER such as site closure and
reclamation costs in the period in which it is incurred
if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. PER
can include facility decommissioning and dismantling;
removal or treatment of waste materials; site and land
rehabilitation, including compliance with and monitoring
of environmental regulations; security and other site-
related costs required to perform the rehabilitation work;
and operation of equipment designed to reduce or
eliminate environmental effects.
Provisions for the cost of each rehabilitation program
are recognized at the time that an environmental
disturbance occurs or a constructive obligation is
determined. When the extent of disturbance increases
over the life of an operation, the provision is increased
53
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS accordingly. We record a PER in our financial statements
when it is incurred and capitalize this amount as an
increase in the carrying amount of the related asset. At
operating mines, the increase in a PER is recorded as an
adjustment to the corresponding asset carrying amount
and results in a prospective increase in depreciation
expense. At closed mines, any adjustment to a PER is
recognized as an expense in the consolidated statement
of income.
PERs are measured at the expected value of the
future cash flows, discounted to their present value using
a current, US dollar real risk-free pre-tax discount rate.
The expected future cash flows exclude the effect of
inflation. The unwinding of the discount, referred to as
accretion expense, is included in finance costs and results
in an increase in the amount of the provision. Provisions
are updated each reporting period for the effect of a
change in the discount rate and foreign exchange rate
when applicable, and the change in estimate is added or
deducted from the related asset and depreciated
prospectively over the asset’s useful life. A 1% increase in
the discount rate would result in a decrease of PER by
$266 million and a 1% decrease in the discount rate
would result in an increase in PER by $332 million, while
holding the other assumptions constant.
In the future, changes in regulations or laws or
enforcement could adversely affect our operations; and
any instances of non-compliance with laws or regulations
that result in fines or injunctions or delays in projects, or
any unforeseen environmental contamination at, or
related to, our mining properties, could result in us
suffering significant costs. We mitigate these risks
through environmental and health and safety programs
under which we monitor compliance with laws and
regulations and take steps to reduce the risk of
environmental contamination occurring. We maintain
insurance for some environmental risks; however, for
some risks, coverage cannot be purchased at a
reasonable cost. Our coverage may not provide full
recovery for all possible causes of loss. The principal
factors that can cause expected cash flows to change
are: the construction of new processing facilities;
changes in the quantities of material in reserves and a
corresponding change in the life of mine plan; changing
ore characteristics that ultimately impact the environment;
changes in water quality that impact the extent of water
treatment required; and changes in laws and regulations
governing the protection of the environment. In general,
as the end of the mine life nears, the reliability of
expected cash flows increases, but earlier in the mine
life, the estimation of a PER is inherently more subjective.
Significant judgments and estimates are made when
estimating the fair value of PERs. Expected cash flows
relating to PERs could occur over periods of up to 40
years and the assessment of the extent of environmental
remediation work is highly subjective. Considering all of
these factors that go into the determination of a PER, the
fair value of PERs can materially change over time.
The amount of PERs recorded reflects the expected
cost, taking into account the probability of particular
scenarios. The difference between the upper end of the
range of these assumptions and the lower end of the
range can be significant, and consequently changes
in these assumptions could have a material effect on
the fair value of PERs and future earnings in a period
of change.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, our PER
balance decreased by $304 million, primarily due to an
increase in the discount rate used to calculate the PER
($476 million) and also due to the divestiture of various
sites as well as our oil and gas business that occurred in
2013 ($165 million). These decreases were offset by
various increases in our PER liabilities as a result of our
expanded footprint. The offset was a corresponding
decrease in PP&E for our operations and a credit to other
expense at our closed sites.
PERs
($ millions)
As at December 31
Operating mines
Closed mines and mines in closure
Development projects
Other
Total
2013
2012
$ 1,524
731
104
–
$ 1,968
386
211
98
$ 2,359
$ 2,663
54
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Accounting for impairment of non-current assets
In accordance with our accounting policy, goodwill is
tested for impairment in the fourth quarter and also
when there is an indicator of impairment. Non-current
assets are tested for impairment when events or changes
in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may
not be recoverable.
When there is an indicator of impairment of non-
current assets within an operating segment consisting of
a Cash Generating Unit (“CGU”) or group of CGUs that
contain goodwill, we test the non-current assets for
impairment first and recognize any impairment loss on
the non-current assets before testing the operating
segment for any potential goodwill impairment. When
there is an indicator of impairment of non-current assets
within an operating segment consisting of a single CGU
that contains goodwill, we test the non-current assets for
impairment first and recognize any impairment loss on
goodwill first and then any remaining impairment loss is
applied against the non-current assets.
An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying
amount exceeds the recoverable amount. The recoverable
amount of each operating segment for goodwill testing
purposes has been determined based on its estimated
fair value less cost of disposal (“FVLCD”), which has
been determined to be greater than the Value in Use
(“VIU”) amounts. The recoverable amount for non-
current asset testing is calculated using the same
approach as for goodwill, however, the assessment is
done at the CGU level, which is the lowest level for
which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of
the cash flows of other assets. A CGU is generally an
individual operating mine or development project.
Summary of impairments
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded post-
tax impairment losses of $8.7 billion (2012: $3.5 billion)
for non-current assets and $2.8 billion (2012: $798
million) for goodwill, as summarized in the table below:
($ millions)
Pascua-Lama
Lumwana
Jabal Sayid
Porgera
Buzwagi
Veladero
North Mara
Reko Diq
Pierina
Exploration properties
Highland Gold
Round Mountain
Granny Smith
Marigold
Ruby Hill
Kanowna
Plutonic
Darlot
AFS investments
Other
2013
2012 (restated)
Post-tax
(our
share)
Pre-tax
(100%)
Post-tax
(our
share)
Pre-tax
(100%)
$ 6,061 $ 6,007
–
–
704
860
595
746
439
721
300
464
125
286
–
–
98
140
94
112
–
–
51
78
73
73
39
60
33
51
41
41
26
37
25
36
23
26
57
80
–
–
$ 4,982 $ 3,048
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
120
–
169
86
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
46
93
–
120
–
164
84
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
40
48
Total non-current asset
impairment losses
$ 9,872 $ 8,730
$ 5,496 $ 3,504
Australia Pacific
Copper
Capital Projects
ABG
Total goodwill
$ 1,200 $ 1,200
1,033
397
185
1,033
397
185
–
–
$ 798 $ 798
–
–
–
–
impairment losses
$ 2,815 $ 2,815
$ 798 $ 798
Tax effects and NCI
–
1,142
–
1,992
Total impairment losses
$ 12,687 $ 12,687
$ 6,294 $ 6,294
55
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
In fourth quarter 2013, we recorded post-tax impairment
losses of $2.3 billion for non-current assets and $551 million
for goodwill, as summarized in the table below:
For the three months ended
December 31, 2013
($ millions)
Pascua-Lama
Porgera
Veladero
Jabal Sayid
North Mara
Round Mountain
Marigold
Kanowna
Ruby Hill
Plutonic
AFS investments
Other
Pre-tax
(100%)
$ 896
746
464
359
133
78
60
(66)
51
17
5
50
Post-tax
(our share)
$ 896
595
300
303
58
51
39
(66)
33
12
5
31
Total non-current asset
impairment losses
Australia Pacific goodwill
impairment losses
$ 2,793
$ 2,257
$ 551
$ 551
Tax effects and NCI
–
536
Total impairment losses
$ 3,344
$ 3,344
2013 indicators of impairment
Second Quarter 2013
The significant decrease in our long-term gold, silver
and copper price assumptions in second quarter 2013,
due to declining market prices, as well as the regulatory
challenges to Pascua-Lama in May 2013 and the
resulting schedule delays and associated capital
expenditure increases; and a significant change to the
mine plan at our Pierina mine, were all considered
indicators of impairment, and, accordingly, we
performed an impairment assessment for every mine
site and significant advanced development project.
As a result of this assessment, we recorded non-current
asset impairment losses of $6.4 billion after any related
income tax effects, including a $5.1 billion impairment
loss related to the carrying value of the PP&E at Pascua-
Lama; $401 million related to the Jabal Sayid project in
our copper segment; $502 million related to Buzwagi
and North Mara in African Barrick Gold; $219 million
related to the Kanowna, Granny Smith, Plutonic and
Darlot mines in our Australia Pacific Gold segment; and
$98 million related to our Pierina mine in South America.
After reflecting the above non-current asset
impairment losses, we conducted goodwill impairment
tests and determined that the carrying value of our
Copper, Australia Pacific Gold, Capital Projects and
African Barrick Gold segments exceeded their FVLCD,
and therefore we recorded a total goodwill impairment
loss of $2.3 billion. The FVLCD of our copper segment
was negatively impacted by the decrease in our long-
term copper price assumption in second quarter 2013.
The FVLCD of our Australia Pacific Gold segment was
negatively impacted by the significant decrease in
second quarter 2013 in our long-term gold price
assumption. The FVLCD of our Capital Projects segment
was negatively impacted by the significant decrease in
second quarter 2013 in our long-term gold and silver
price assumptions, as well as the schedule delays and
associated capital expenditure increase at our Pascua-
Lama project. The FVLCD of our African Barrick
Gold segment was negatively impacted by significant
changes in the life of mine (“LOM”) plans in second
quarter 2013 for various assets in the segment, as well
as the significant decrease in our long-term gold
price assumption.
Third Quarter 2013
In September 2013, we finalized an agreement with
the Government of the Dominican Republic (“the
Government”) concerning amendments to the SLA.
The amendments will result in significant additional
and accelerated tax revenues to the Government,
and therefore we determined this was an indicator of
impairment. Based on our assessment of the economic
impact of these amendments, the carrying value of
the mine was recoverable as at September 30, 2013.
Fourth Quarter 2013
In fourth quarter 2013, as described below, we identified
indicators of impairment at certain of our mines,
resulting in non-current asset impairment losses totaling
$2.3 billion after any related income tax effects. As a
result of our fourth quarter 2013 decision to temporarily
suspend construction of our Pascua-Lama Project, we
have recorded a further impairment loss on the project
of $896 million, bringing the total impairment loss for
Pascua-Lama to $6.0 billion for the full year. At our
Porgera mine in Papua New Guinea, we have changed
our LOM plan to focus primarily on the higher grade
underground mine. The new plan resulted in a decrease
in the estimated mine life from 13 to 9 years, and a
56
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
decrease in the estimated FVLCD of the mine, which
has resulted in an impairment loss of $595 million. At
our Veladero mine in Argentina, the annual update
to the LOM plan, which was completed in fourth quarter
2013, was significantly impacted by the lower gold
price assumption as well as the effect of sustained local
inflationary pressures on operating and capital costs.
The new plan resulted in a reduction of reserves and
LOM production as the next open pit cutback is
uneconomic at current gold prices. This resulted in a
significant decrease in the estimated FVLCD of the mine,
and accordingly, we recorded an impairment loss of
$300 million (post-tax). The annual update to the LOM
plan resulted in a decrease in the net present value of
our Jabal Sayid project, which is the basis for estimating
the project’s FVLCD, and was therefore considered
an indicator of impairment. Jabal Sayid’s FVLCD was
also negatively impacted by the delay in achieving
first production as a result of the HCIS compliance
requirements and ongoing discussions with the DMMR
with respect to the transfer of ownership of the
project. As a result, we recorded an impairment loss
of $303 million. The annual update to the LOM plan
showed a decrease in the net present value at our Round
Mountain mine, which was considered to be an indicator
of impairment, and we recorded an impairment loss of
$51 million. At North Mara, several changes were made
to the LOM plan, including a decision to defer Gokona
Cut 3, while ABG finalizes a feasibility study into the
alternative of mining out this reserve by underground
methods. This was considered an indicator of impairment
for North Mara, resulting in an impairment loss of
$58 million. A wall failure at our Ruby Hill mine in
Nevada was also identified as an indicator of impairment,
resulting in the impairment of assets specifically related
to the open pit of $33 million.
As at December 31, 2013, four of our mines, namely
Plutonic, Kanowna, Marigold and Tulawaka, met the
criteria as assets held for sale. Accordingly, we are
required to re-measure these CGUs to the lower of
carrying value and FVLCD. Using these new re-measured
values resulted in impairment losses of $12 million at
Plutonic and $39 million at Marigold. Also, based on the
estimated FVLCD of the expected proceeds related to the
expected sale of Kanowna, we have reversed $66 million
of the impairment loss recorded in second quarter 2013.
After reflecting the above non-current asset
impairment losses, we conducted our annual goodwill
impairment test, prior to the reorganization of our
operating segments, and determined that the carrying
value of our Australia Pacific segment exceeded its
FVLCD and therefore we recorded a goodwill impairment
loss of $551 million bringing the total impairment loss
for Australia Pacific Gold goodwill to $1,200 million for
the full year. After the reorganization of the operating
segments, we did not identify any indicators of
impairment.
2012 indicators of impairment
In fourth quarter 2012, we prepared an updated LOM
plan for Lumwana, which reflected information obtained
from an extensive exploration and infill drilling program
that was completed late in the fourth quarter of 2012.
The new LOM plan also reflected revised operating
and sustaining capital costs. In particular, unit mining
costs were determined to be significantly higher than
previously estimated. The significant changes in the
LOM plan were considered an indicator of impairment,
and, accordingly, we performed an impairment
assessment for Lumwana as at the end of the 2012.
As a result of this assessment, we recorded an
impairment loss of $3.0 billion, related to the carrying
value of the non-current assets at Lumwana in the
fourth quarter of 2012.
In fourth quarter 2012, we also recorded the
following impairment losses: $31 million in PP&E
impairment losses related to Tulawaka in our ABG
segment, primarily as a result of a decrease in the
expected remaining mine life in its most recent LOM
plan; $120 million related to our equity method
investment in Tethyan Copper Company, which holds
our interest in the Reko Diq project; and a $46 million
write-down of power-related assets at our Pueblo Viejo
project, based on new information with respect to
the recoverable amount of these assets received in
fourth quarter 2012.
Other impairment losses recorded in 2012 included:
$164 million related to exploration properties, included
in intangible assets, in Papua New Guinea and Saudi
Arabia as a result of our decision to cease exploration
activities ($140 million in Papua New Guinea in third
quarter 2012 and $24 million in Saudi Arabia in fourth
57
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS quarter 2012); and $84 million related to our equity
method investment in Highland Gold as a result of the
disposition of our equity interest in first quarter 2012.
After reflecting the above non-current asset losses,
we conducted our goodwill impairment tests and
determined that the carrying value of our copper
segment exceeded its FVLCD, and therefore we recorded
a goodwill impairment loss of $798 million. The FVLCD
of our copper segment was impacted by increases in
expected future operating and capital costs.
Key assumptions
The key assumptions and estimates used in determining
the FVLCD are related to commodity prices, discount
rates, NAV multiples for gold assets, operating costs,
exchange rates and capital expenditures. In addition,
assumptions related to comparable entities, market
values per ounce and per pound and the inclusion of
reserves and resources in market multiples calculations
are used.
Gold
For the gold segments, excluding Pascua-Lama, FVLCD
for each of the CGUs was determined by calculating
the net present value (“NPV”) of the future cash flows
expected to be generated by the mines and projects
within the segments. The estimates of future cash flows
were derived from the most recent LOM plans and,
where the LOM plans excludes a material portion of total
reserves and resources, we assign value to resources not
considered in these base models. These values are then
aggregated to the segment level, the level at which
goodwill is tested. Based on observable market or
publicly available data, including spot and forward prices
and equity sell-side analyst forecasts, we make an
assumption of future gold and silver prices to estimate
future revenues. The future cash flows for each gold
mine are discounted using a real weighted average cost
of capital (“WACC”), which reflects specific market risk
factors for each mine. Some gold companies trade at a
market capitalization greater than the NPV of their
expected cash flows. Market participants describe this as
a “NAV multiple”, which represents the multiple applied
to the NPV to arrive at the trading price. The NAV
multiple is generally understood to take account of a
variety of additional value factors such as the exploration
potential of the mineral property, namely the ability to
find and produce more metal than what is currently
included in the LOM plan or reserve and resource
estimates, and the benefit of gold price optionality. As a
result, we applied a specific NAV multiple to the NPV of
each CGU within each gold segment based on the NAV
multiples observed in the market in recent periods and
that we judged to be appropriate to the CGU.
Pascua-Lama
The fair value for Pascua-Lama was determined by
considering both the NPV, determined consistent with
our gold CGUs, as well as market multiples expressed as
dollar per ounce of proven and probable reserves based
on observed market metrics for comparable assets. Both
these approaches were used, with the market approach
being the primary method as the LOM for Pascua-Lama
has uncertainty due to adjustments to reflect the
updated estimated timeline for the project that existed at
the time of the testing. The observable market multiples
were adjusted, where appropriate, for country risk if the
comparable asset was in a different country and any
change in metal prices since the valuation date of the
comparable asset.
Copper
For our Copper segment, the FVLCD for each of the
CGUs was determined based on the NPV of future cash
flows expected to be generated using the most recent
LOM plans aggregated to the segment level. Based on
observable market or publicly available data including
spot and forward prices and equity sell-side analyst
consensus, we make an assumption of future copper
prices to estimate future revenues. The future cash flows
for each copper mine were discounted using a WACC
depending on the location and market risk factors for
each mine. Fair value for Lumwana was also estimated
by considering market multiples expressed as dollar per
pound based primarily on the observed valuation metrics
for comparable assets. Both these approaches were used
as the LOM for Lumwana has uncertainty due to the
ongoing optimization program to generate additional
value from the LOM. The observable market multiples
were adjusted where appropriate for country risk if the
comparable asset was in a different country and any
change in metal prices since the valuation date of the
comparable asset.
58
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS The key assumptions used in our impairment testing
are summarized in the table below:
As at December 31, 2013
Carrying value
in sales price
Decrease in fair value
with a 10% decrease
Gold price per oz
Silver price per oz
Copper price per lb
WACC – gold (range)
WACC – gold (avg)
WACC – copper (range)
WACC – copper (avg)
NAV multiple – gold (avg)
LOM years – gold (range)
LOM years – gold (avg)
LOM years – copper (range)
LOM years – copper (avg)
Reserves – gold price per oz1
Reserves – silver price per oz
Reserves – copper price per lb
Fourth
Quarter
2013
Fourth
Quarter
2012
$ 1,300
23
$
$ 3.25
2%–7%
5%
$ 1,700
$
32
$ 3.65
3%–8%
5%
7%–9% 6%–8%
7%
1.2
2–32
14
13–33
21
$ 1,100 $ 1,500
28
21 $
$
$ 3.00 $ 3.00
7%
1.1
3–29
13
14–24
18
ARS:USD exchange rate
8.5–10.0
5.0–5.5
1. In our LOM plans we used $1,100/oz for the first 5 years and $1,300/oz thereafter.
Sensitivities
We performed a sensitivity analysis on commodity price,
which is the key assumption that impacts the impairment
calculations. We assumed a negative 10% change for
the assumption, taking sales price from $1,300 per
ounce down to $1,170 per ounce for gold, $3.25 per
pound down to $2.93 per pound for copper and $23 per
ounce to $20.70 per ounce for silver, while holding all
other assumptions constant. We note that this sensitivity
identifies the key assets where the decrease in the sales
price, in isolation, could cause the carrying value of our
operating segments to exceed its recoverable amount
for the purposes of the goodwill impairment test or the
carrying value of any of our CGUs to exceed its recoverable
amount for the purposes of the non-current asset
impairment test where an indicator of impairment for
the non-current asset was identified.
Should there be a significant decline in commodity
prices, we would take actions to assess the implications
on our life of mine plans, including the determination
of reserves and resources, and the appropriate cost
structure for the operating segments. The recoverable
amount of the operating segments and CGUs would also
be impacted by other market factors such as changes in
net asset value multiples and the value per ounce/pound
of comparable market entities. Based on the results of
the impairment testing performed in fourth quarter
2013, the carrying value of the operating segments and
CGUs that are most sensitive to the change in sales
prices used in the test are:
Copper segment1
Australia Pacific segment1
Cerro Casale
Veladero1
Lumwana1
Jabal Sayid1
Porgera1
North Mara1
Round Mountain1
$ 5,299
1,488
1,514
1,009
1,008
711
393
369
166
$ 1,700
850
1,200
600
850
80
390
130
150
1. These operating segments/CGUs have been impaired in either 2012 or 2013
and therefore their fair value approximates carrying value.
In addition, for our Pascua-Lama project, we have
determined our valuation primarily based on a market
approach. The key assumption that impacts the
impairment calculations, should there be an indication
of impairment for this CGU, is the value per ounce of
gold and silver based on an analysis of comparable
companies. We assumed a negative 10% change for the
assumption of gold and silver value per ounce, while
holding all other assumptions constant and, based on
the results of the impairment testing performed in
fourth quarter 2013 for Pascua-Lama, the fair value of
the CGU would have been reduced from $1.2 billion
to $1.1 billion (December 31, 2013 carrying value:
$1.2 billion). We note that this sensitivity identifies the
decrease in the value that, in isolation, would cause the
carrying value of the CGU to exceed its recoverable
amount. For Pascua-Lama, this value decrease is linear
to the decrease in value per ounce.
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Measurement of Temporary Differences
We are periodically required to estimate the tax basis
of assets and liabilities. Where applicable tax laws and
regulations are either unclear or subject to varying
interpretations, it is possible that changes in these
estimates could occur that materially affect the amounts
of deferred income tax assets and liabilities recorded in
our consolidated financial statements. Changes in
deferred tax assets and liabilities generally have a direct
impact on earnings in the period of changes.
Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets
Each period, we evaluate the likelihood of whether some
portion or all of each deferred tax asset will not be
realized. This evaluation is based on historic and future
expected levels of taxable income, the pattern and timing
of reversals of taxable temporary timing differences that
give rise to deferred tax liabilities, and tax planning
59
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
activities. Levels of future taxable income are affected by,
among other things, market gold prices, and production
costs, quantities of proven and probable gold and copper
reserves, interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates. If we determine that it is probable (a likelihood of
more than 50%) that all or some portion of a deferred
tax asset will not be realized, we do not recognize it in
our financial statements. Changes in recognition of
deferred tax assets are recorded as a component of
income tax expense or recovery for each period. The
most significant recent trend impacting expected levels
of future taxable income and the amount of recognition
of deferred tax assets, has been raising market gold
prices. A decline in market gold prices could lead to
derecognition of deferred tax assets and a corresponding
increase in income tax expense.
Deferred Tax Assets Not Recognized
($ millions)
As at December 31
Australia and Papua New Guinea
Canada
US
Chile
Argentina
Barbados
Tanzania
Zambia
Other
2013
2012
$ 456
139
50
471
928
71
107
43
17
$ 181
88
2
3
–
73
43
48
12
$ 2,282
$ 450
Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
Australia and Papua New Guinea: most of the
unrecognized deferred tax assets relate to capital losses
that can only be utilized if capital gains are realized, as
well as to tax assets in subsidiaries that do not have any
present sources of gold production or taxable income. In
the event that these subsidiaries have sources of taxable
income in the future, we may recognize some of the
deferred tax assets.
Canada: most of the unrecognized deferred tax
assets relate to tax pools which can only be utilized by
income from specific sources and to capital losses
that can only be utilized if capital gains are realized in
the future.
US: most of the unrecognized deferred tax assets
relate to AMT credits which are not probable to
be utilized.
Chile and Argentina: most of the unrecognized
deferred tax assets relate to Pascua-Lama tax assets, that,
considering the suspension of construction activities, do
not have any present sources of gold production or
taxable income. In the event that there will be sources of
taxable income in the future, we may recognize some or
all of the deferred tax assets.
Tanzania, Barbados, Zambia, and Other: the
unrecognized deferred tax assets relate to the full amount
of tax assets in subsidiaries that do not have any present,
or sufficient, sources of gold production or taxable
income. In the event that these subsidiaries have sources
of taxable income in the future, we may recognize some
or all of the deferred tax assets.
Adjusted Net Earnings (Adjusted Net Earnings
per Share) and Adjusted Return on Equity
Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure
which excludes the following from net earnings:
n Significant tax adjustments not related to current
period earnings;
n Impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles,
goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and
investments;
n Gains/losses and other one-time costs relating to
acquisitions/dispositions;
n Foreign currency translation gains/losses;
n Costs related to restructuring/severance arrangements,
care and maintenance and demobilization costs, and
other expenses not related to current operations;
n Unrealized gains/losses on non-hedge derivative
instruments; and
n Change in the measurement of the PER at closed sites.
Management uses this measure internally to evaluate the
underlying operating performance of the Company as a
whole for the reporting periods presented, and to assist
with the planning and forecasting of future operating
results. We believe that adjusted net earnings allows
investors and analysts to better evaluate the results of
the underlying business of the Company. Management
believes that adjusted net earnings is a useful measure
of the Company’s performance because tax adjustments
not related to current period; impairment charges,
gains/losses and other one-time costs relating to asset
acquisitions/dispositions and business combinations;
60
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
and project costs related to restructuring/severance
arrangements, project care and maintenance and
demobilization costs, do not reflect the underlying
operating performance of our core mining business
and are not necessarily indicative of future operating
results. We also adjust for changes in PER discount rates
relating to our closed sites as they are not related to
our current operating sites and not necessarily indicative
of underlying results. Furthermore, foreign currency
translation gains/losses and unrealized gains/losses from
non-hedge derivatives are not necessarily reflective of
the underlying operating results for the reporting
periods presented.
As noted, the Company uses this measure for its
own internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets
and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect
potential impairment charges, potential gains/losses on
the acquisition/disposition of assets, foreign currency
translation gains/losses, or unrealized gains/losses on
non-hedge derivatives. Consequently, the presentation
of adjusted net earnings enables investors and analysts
to better understand the underlying operating
performance of our core mining business through the
eyes of Management. Management periodically
evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings
based on an internal assessment of performance
measures that are useful for evaluating the operating
performance of our business segments and a review of
the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry
analysts and other mining companies.
We also present adjusted return on equity as a
measure which is calculated by dividing adjusted net
earnings by average shareholders’ equity. Management
believes this to be a useful indicator of the Company’s
performance. We use adjusted net earnings to calculate
the adjusted return on equity as management believes
it is a useful measure of the Company’s underlying
operating performance of our core mining business.
Adjusted net earnings is intended to provide
additional information only and does not have any
standardized definition under IFRS and should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures
of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The
measures are not necessarily indicative of operating
profit or cash flow from operations as determined under
IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures
differently. The following table reconciles these non-
GAAP measures to the most directly comparable
IFRS measure.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted Net Earnings, Adjusted Net Earnings per Share and Adjusted Return on Equity1
For the years
ended Dec. 31
For the three months
ended Dec. 31
($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars)
2013
20122
2011
2013
20122
Net earnings (losses) attributable to equity holders
of the Company
Impairment charges related to intangibles, property,
plant and equipment, and investments
Acquisition/disposition (gains)/losses
Foreign currency translation (gains)/losses
Acquisition related costs
Tax adjustments
Other expense adjustments3
Restructuring costs
Unrealized (gains)/losses on non-hedge derivative instruments
Adjusted net earnings
Net earnings (losses) per share4
Adjusted net earnings per share4
Average shareholders’ equity
Adjusted return on equity5
$ (10,366)
$
(538)
$ 4,484
$ (2,830)
$ (3,013)
11,536
442
233
–
297
483
–
(56)
4,425
(13)
125
–
(83)
75
–
(37)
165
(165)
(5)
97
122
32
2
(66)
2,815
(31)
138
–
17
296
–
1
4,161
1
97
–
(42)
42
–
(89)
$ 2,569
$ 3,954
$ 4,666
$
406
$ 1,157
$ (10.14)
2.51
$ 17,753
14%
$
(0.54)
3.95
$ 22,668
17%
$
4.49
4.67
$ 21,418
22%
$
(2.61)
0.37
$ 13,576
12%
$
(3.01)
1.16
$ 23,611
20%
1. Amounts presented in this table are after-tax and net of non-controlling interest.
2. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
3. Other expense adjustments include demobilization and severance costs relating to Pascua-Lama for the three months and year ended December 31, 2013 of
$176 million and $258 million, respectively.
4. Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.
5. Calculated as annualized adjusted net earnings divided by average shareholders’ equity.
61
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Significant adjusting items (net of tax and non-
controlling interest effects) for 2013 include:
$11.5 billion in impairment charges; $466 million in
losses related to the disposition of Barrick Energy;
$258 million in project care and maintenance and
demobilization costs at Pascua-Lama; $249 million in
income tax expense at Pueblo Viejo, related to the
impact of the substantive enactment of the revised
SLA; $233 million in unrealized foreign currency
translation losses; $94 million increase in rehabilitation
provision for Pierina as a result of its accelerated closure;
and $21 million in restructuring costs related to the
company-wide role reductions; partially offset by
$56 million in realized and unrealized gains on non-
hedge derivative instruments and a $3 million gain on
the sale of the Yilgarn South assets.
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow
Adjusted operating cash flow is a non-GAAP financial
measure which excludes the effect of the settlement
of currency contracts, the impact of one-time costs and
working capital adjustments relating to business
combinations.
Management uses adjusted operating cash flow as a
measure internally to evaluate the underlying operating
cash flow performance of the Company as a whole for
the reporting periods presented, and to assist with the
planning and forecasting of future operating cash flow.
The elimination of one-time costs and working
capital adjustments relating to business combinations are
activities that are not reflective of the underlying capacity
of our operations to generate operating cash flow and
therefore this adjustment will result in a more meaningful
operating cash flow measure for investors and analysts
to evaluate our performance in the period and assess our
future operating cash flow-generating capability.
We have also adjusted our operating cash flow to
remove the effect of the settlement of contingent
consideration and non-recurring tax payments. This
settlement activity and non-recurring tax payments are
not reflective of the underlying capacity of our operations
to generate operating cash flow on a recurring basis, and
therefore this adjustment will result in a more meaningful
operating cash flow measure for investors and analysts
to evaluate our performance in the period and assess our
future operating cash flow-generating capability.
Free cash flow is a measure which excludes our share
of capital expenditures from adjusted operating cash
flow. Management believes this to be a useful indicator
of the Company’s ability to operate without reliance on
additional borrowing or usage of existing cash.
Adjusted operating cash flow, adjusted operating
cash flow before working capital changes and free cash
flow are intended to provide additional information
only and do not have any standardized definition under
IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for measures of performance prepared in
accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily
indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations
as determined under IFRS. Other companies may
calculate these measures differently. The following table
reconciles these non-GAAP measures to the most directly
comparable IFRS measure.
Reconciliation of Operating Cash Flow to Adjusted Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow
For the years
ended Dec. 31
For the three months
ended Dec. 31
($ millions)
2013
20121
2011
2013
20121
Operating cash flow
Settlement of currency and commodity contracts
Settlement of contingent consideration
Non-recurring tax payments
Withholding tax payments
Acquisition costs expensed and related working capital movements
Adjusted operating cash flow
Capital expenditures
Free cash flow
$ 4,239
64
–
56
–
–
$ 4,359
(5,501)
$ 5,983
(385)
50
52
–
–
$ 5,700
(6,773)
$ 5,315
–
–
161
204
$ 5,680
(4,598)
$ 1,016
69
–
–
–
–
$ 1,085
(1,365)
$ 1,845
80
–
–
–
–
$ 1,925
(2,039)
$ (1,142)
$ (1,073)
$ 1,082
$
(280)
$
(114)
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
62
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Adjusted operating costs per ounce, All-in sustaining
costs per ounce, All-in costs per ounce, C1 cash costs
per pound and C3 fully allocated costs per pound
Beginning with our 2012 Annual Report, we adopted a
non-GAAP “all-in sustaining costs per ounce” measure.
This was based on the expectation that the World Gold
Council (“WGC”) (a market development organization
for the gold industry comprised of and funded by 18
gold mining companies from around the world, including
Barrick) was developing a similar metric and that
investors and industry analysts were interested in a
measure that better represented the total recurring costs
associated with producing gold. The WGC is not a
regulatory organization. In June 2013, the WGC
published its definition of “adjusted operating costs”,
“all-in sustaining costs” and also a definition of “all-in
costs.” Barrick voluntarily adopted the definition of these
metrics starting with our second quarter 2013 MD&A.
The “all-in sustaining costs” measure is similar to
our presentation in reports prior to second quarter 2013,
with the exception of the classification of sustaining
capital. In our previous calculation, certain capital
expenditures were presented as mine expansion projects,
whereas they meet the definition of sustaining capital
expenditures under the WGC definition, and therefore
these expenditures have been reclassified as sustaining
capital expenditures.
Our “all-in costs” measure starts with “all-in
sustaining costs” and adds additional costs which reflect
the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle
of a mine, including: non-sustaining capital expenditures
(capital expenditures at new projects and capital
expenditures at existing operations related to projects
that significantly increase the net present value of the
mine and are not related to current production) and
other non-sustaining costs (primarily exploration and
evaluation (“E&E”) costs, community relations costs and
general and administrative costs that are not associated
with current operations). This definition recognizes that
there are different costs associated with the life-cycle of
a mine, and that it is therefore appropriate to distinguish
between sustaining and non-sustaining costs.
We believe that our use of “all-in sustaining costs”
and “all-in costs” will assist analysts, investors and other
stakeholders of Barrick in understanding the costs
associated with producing gold, understanding the
economics of gold mining, assessing our operating
performance and also our ability to generate free cash
flow from current operations and to generate free cash
flow on an overall Company basis. Due to the capital
intensive nature of the industry and the long useful lives
over which these items are depreciated, there can be a
significant timing difference between net earnings
calculated in accordance with IFRS and the amount of
free cash flow that is being generated by a mine. In the
current market environment for gold mining equities,
many investors and analysts are more focused on the
ability of gold mining companies to generate free cash
flow from current operations, and consequently we
believe these measures are useful non-GAAP operating
metrics and supplement our IFRS disclosures. These
measures are not representative of all of our cash
expenditures as they do not include income tax
payments, interest costs or dividend payments. These
measures do not include depreciation or amortization.
“All-in sustaining costs” and “all-in costs” are intended
to provide additional information only and do not have
standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. These
measures are not equivalent to net income or cash flow
from operations as determined under IFRS. Although the
WGC has published a standardized definition, other
companies may calculate these measures differently.
Starting in our second quarter 2013 MD&A, the
non-GAAP measure “total cash costs” was renamed
“adjusted operating costs” in order to conform with
the WGC definition of the comparable measure. The
manner in which this measure is calculated has not
been changed.
Beginning in our second quarter 2013 MD&A, in
addition to presenting these metrics on a by-product
basis, we have calculated these metrics on a co-product
basis. Our co-product metrics remove the impact of other
metal sales that are produced as a by-product of our
gold production from cost per ounce calculations, but
does not reflect a reduction in costs for costs associated
with other metal sales.
We believe that C1 cash costs per pound enables
investors to better understand the performance of
our global copper segment in comparison to other
copper producers who present results on a similar basis.
C1 cash costs per pound excludes royalties and non-
routine charges as they are not direct production costs.
C3 fully allocated costs per pound include C1 cash
costs, depreciation, royalties, exploration and evaluation
expense, administration expense and non-routine charges.
63
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to Adjusted Operating Costs per ounce, All-in Sustaining Costs
per ounce and All-in Costs per ounce
For the years
ended Dec. 31
For the three months
ended Dec. 31
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)
Reference
2013
20121
2011
2013
20121
Cost of sales
Cost of sales applicable to non-controlling interests2
Cost of sales applicable to ore purchase arrangement
Other metal sales
Realized non-hedge gains/losses on fuel hedges
Corporate social responsibility costs related to current operations
Treatment and refinement charges
Total production costs
Depreciation
Impact of Barrick Energy
Adjusted operating costs
General & administrative costs
Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites)
Mine on-site exploration and evaluation costs
Mine development expenditures3
Sustaining capital expenditures3
All-in sustaining costs
Corporate social responsibility costs not related
to current operations
Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization not related
to current operations
Exploration and evaluation costs (non-sustaining)
Non-sustaining capital expenditures3
Pascua-Lama
Pueblo Viejo
Cortez
Goldstrike thiosulphate project
Bulyanhulu CIL
Other
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
M
F
K
L
M
M
M
M
M
M
$ 6,064
(383)
(46)
(190)
(20)
52
6
$ 6,078
(216)
(161)
(141)
(8)
39
6
$ 5,223
(186)
(126)
(158)
(7)
25
8
$ 1,445
(103)
(1)
(43)
(5)
20
2
$ 1,694
(58)
(42)
(38)
(19)
13
2
$ 5,483
$ 5,597
$ 4,779
$ 1,315
$ 1,552
$ (1,363)
(57)
$ (1,401)
(90)
$ (1,162)
(118)
$
(268)
–
$
(419)
(24)
$ 4,063
$ 4,106
$ 3,499
$ 1,047
$ 1,109
$
298
139
61
1,101
901
$
438
131
115
1,222
1,381
$
384
135
92
894
1,192
$
63
31
16
236
251
$ 124
35
34
353
470
$ 6,563
$ 7,393
$ 6,196
$ 1,644
$ 2,125
$
23
$
26
$
20
$
12
$
11
10
117
1,998
29
132
223
83
24
10
193
1,869
512
27
145
27
35
10
232
1,399
565
69
30
5
86
2
30
606
(4)
9
71
30
8
2
44
532
110
(9)
61
22
7
All-in costs
$ 9,202
$ 10,237
$ 8,612
$ 2,408
$ 2,905
Ounces sold – consolidated basis (000s ounces)
Ounces sold – non-controlling interest (000s ounces)2
7,604
(430)
7,465
(173)
7,758
(208)
1,951
(122)
2,071
(44)
Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)
7,174
7,292
7,550
1,829
2,027
Total production costs per ounce4
Adjusted operating costs per ounce4
Adjusted operating costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)4,5
All-in sustaining costs per ounce4
All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)4,5
All-in costs per ounce4
All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)4,5
$
$
$
$
$
764
566
589
915
938
$
$
$
767
563
580
$ 1,014
$ 1,031
$
$
$
$
$
633
463
484
821
842
$
$
$
$
$
719
573
592
899
918
$ 1,282
$ 1,305
$ 1,404
$ 1,421
$ 1,141
$ 1,162
$ 1,317
$ 1,336
$ 766
$ 547
$ 564
$ 1,048
$ 1,065
$ 1,433
$ 1,450
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
2. Relates to interest in Pueblo Viejo and ABG held by outside shareholders.
3. Amounts represent our share of capital expenditures.
4. Total production costs, adjusted operating costs, all-in sustaining costs, and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table
due to rounding.
5. Amounts presented on a co-product basis remove the impact of other metal sales (net of non-controlling interest) from cost per ounce calculations that are
produced as a by-product of our gold production.
64
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)
2013
20121
2011
2013
20121
For the years
ended Dec. 31
For the three months
ended Dec. 31
References
A Cost of sales – gold
Cost of sales (statement of income)
Less: cost of sales – copper (Note 7)
Add: Barrick Energy depreciation (Note 4)
Less: Non-gold COS
$ 7,243
(1,091)
43
(131)
$ 7,257
(1,227)
102
(54)
$ 6,240
(915)
97
(199)
$ 1,813
(267)
–
(101)
$ 2,085
(405)
24
(10)
Total Cost of Sales – Gold
$ 6,064
$ 6,078
$ 5,223
$ 1,445
$ 1,694
B Cost of sales applicable to non-controlling interests
Cost of sales applicable to ABG
Direct mining and royalties
Depreciation
Total related to ABG
Portion attributable to non-controlling interest
Cost of sales applicable to Pueblo Viejo
Direct mining and royalties
Depreciation
Total related to Pueblo Viejo
Portion attributable to non-controlling interest
Cost of sales applicable to non-controlling interests
C Cost of sales applicable to ore purchase arrangement
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
580
160
740
189
420
139
559
194
383
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
632
162
794
216
–
–
–
–
216
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
562
138
700
186
–
–
–
–
186
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
139
29
168
$ 169
48
$ 217
42
$
58
143
44
187
61
103
$
$
$
$
–
–
–
–
58
Equal to the cost of sales from ore purchase agreements that have economic characteristics similar to a toll milling arrangement,
as the cost of producing these ounces is not indicative of our normal production costs. These figures cannot be tied directly to the
financial statements or notes.
D Other metal sales
By-product revenues from metals produced in conjunction with gold are deducted from the costs incurred to produce gold (note 6).
By-product revenues from metals produced net of copper and non-controlling interest for the three months and year ended
December 31, 2013 were $36 million and $167 million, respectively (2012: $35 million and $126 million, respectively; 2011: $137 million).
E Realized non-hedge gains/losses on fuel hedges
Fuel gains/(losses) (Note 24e)
Less: Unrealized gains/(losses)
$
12
(32)
$
6
(14)
$
Realized non-hedge gains/(losses) on fuel hedges
$
(20)
$
(8)
$
F Corporate social responsibility costs
CSR costs (Note 9)
Less: NCI of CSR
Less: CSR costs – non-gold
Total CSR – gold
Corporate social responsibility costs related to current operations
Corporate social responsibility costs not related to current operations
Total CSR – gold
G Treatment and refinement charges
$
$
$
$
89
(6)
(8)
75
52
23
75
$
$
$
$
83
(3)
(15)
65
39
26
65
$
$
$
$
(1)
(6)
(7)
55
(2)
(8)
45
25
20
45
$
6
(11)
$
6
(25)
$
(5)
$
(19)
$
$
$
$
36
(3)
(1)
32
20
12
32
$
$
$
30
(1)
(5)
24
13
11
$
24
Treatment and refinement charges, which are recorded against concentrate revenues, for the three months and year ended
December 31, 2013 were $2 million and $6 million, respectively (2012: $2 million and $6 million, respectively; 2011: $8 million).
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
65
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For the years
ended Dec. 31
For the three months
ended Dec. 31
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)
2013
20121
2011
2013
20121
H Depreciation – gold
Depreciation (Note 7)
Less: copper depreciation (Note 5)
Add: Barrick Energy depreciation (Note 4)
Less: NCI and other non-gold depreciation
$ 1,732
(188)
43
(224)
$ 1,651
(253)
102
(99)
$ 1,419
(170)
97
(184)
$
442
(50)
–
(124)
$ 492
(73)
24
(24)
Total depreciation – gold
$ 1,363
$ 1,401
$ 1,162
$
268
$ 419
Impact of Barrick Energy
I
Revenue related to Barrick Energy (Note 4)
Less: COS related to Barrick Energy (Note 4)
Add: Barrick Energy depreciation (Note 4)
Impact of Barrick Energy
J General & administrative costs
Total general & administrative costs (statement of income)
Less: non-operating & non-gold general & administrative costs
Add: Other
Less: non-recurring items
$
93
(79)
43
$
153
(165)
102
$
177
(156)
97
$
57
$
90
$
118
$
390
(79)
18
(31)
$
503
(74)
26
(17)
$
432
(56)
8
–
$
$
$
–
–
–
–
$
40
(40)
24
$
24
93
(19)
3
(14)
$ 139
(22)
7
–
Total general & administrative costs
$
298
$
438
$
384
$
63
$ 124
K Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization
Includes depreciation (note 5) on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations of $17 million and $88 million for the
three months and year ended December 31, 2013, respectively (2012: $24 million and $91 million, respectively; 2011: $97 million) and
accretion (note 11) on the rehabilitation provision of our gold operations of $14 million and $51 million for the three months and year ended
December 31, 2013, respectively (2012: $11 million and $40 million, respectively; 2011: $38 million).
L Exploration and evaluation costs
Exploration and evaluation costs (statement of income)
Less: exploration and evaluation costs – non-gold & NCI
Total exploration and evaluation costs – gold
Exploration & evaluation costs (sustaining)
Exploration and evaluation costs (non-sustaining)
$
$
$
208
(30)
178
61
117
$
$
$
359
(51)
308
115
193
$
$
$
346
(22)
324
92
232
Total exploration and evaluation costs – gold
$
178
$
308
$
324
M Capital expenditures
Gold segments (Note 5)
Pascua-Lama operating unit (Note 5)
Other projects – gold
Capital expenditures – gold
Less: NCI portion
Less: capitalized interest (Note 13)
Add: capitalized interest relating to copper
$ 2,558
2,226
120
$ 3,630
2,113
128
$ 3,492
1,564
290
$ 4,904
$ 5,871
$ 5,346
$ 1,271
$ 2,390
$
(116)
(297)
–
$
(204)
(567)
118
$
(753)
(409)
56
$
(22)
(42)
–
$
(719)
(147)
22
Total capital expenditures – gold
$ 4,491
$ 5,218
$ 4,240
$ 1,207
$ 1,546
Mine development expenditures
Sustaining capital expenditures
Non-sustaining capital expenditures
$ 1,101
901
2,489
$ 1,222
1,381
2,615
$
894
1,192
2,154
$ 236
251
720
$ 353
470
723
Total capital expenditures – gold
$ 4,491
$ 5,218
$ 4,240
$ 1,207
$ 1,546
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
66
$
$
$
$
$
54
(8)
46
16
30
46
$ 108
(30)
$
$
78
34
44
$
78
610
635
26
$ 1,757
604
29
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Reconciliation of Copper Cost of Sales to C1 Cash Costs per pound and C3 Fully Allocated Costs per pound
($ millions, except per pound information in dollars)
2013
20121
2011
2013
20121
For the years
ended Dec. 31
For the three months
ended Dec. 31
Cost of sales
Depreciation/amortization
Treatment and refinement charges
Corporate social responsibility costs
Less: royalties
Less: non-routine charges
Other metal sales
Other
C1 cash cost of sales
Depreciation/amortization
Royalties
Non-routine charges
Administration costs
Other expense (income)
$ 1,091
(184)
126
9
(48)
5
(1)
–
$
$
998
184
48
(5)
16
16
$ 1,227
(253)
95
10
(34)
(56)
(1)
(22)
$ 915
(170)
68
(17)
(34)
(3)
–
$ 267
(49)
36
2
(12)
(1)
–
–
$ 405
(72)
26
3
(11)
(49)
–
(5)
966
$ 759
$ 243
$ 297
$
$
253
34
56
9
27
$ 170
17
34
22
21
$ 49
12
1
3
4
$ 312
134
$ 72
11
49
4
18
$ 451
154
C3 fully allocated cost of sales
$ 1,257
$ 1,345
$ 1,023
Pounds sold – consolidated basis (millions pounds)
519
472
444
C1 cash cost per pound2
$ 1.92
$ 2.05
$ 1.71
$ 1.81
$ 1.93
C3 fully allocated cost per pound2
$ 2.42
$ 2.85
$ 2.30
$ 2.33
$ 2.93
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
2. C1 cash costs per pound and C3 fully allocated costs per pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure, which excludes
the following from net earnings:
n Income tax expense;
n Finance costs;
n Finance income; and
n Depreciation.
Management believes that EBITDA is a valuable indicator
of the Company’s ability to generate liquidity by
producing operating cash flow to: fund working capital
needs, service debt obligations, and fund capital
expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose.
EBITDA is also frequently used by investors and analysts
for valuation purposes whereby EBITDA is multiplied by a
factor or “EBITDA multiple” that is based on an observed
or inferred relationship between EBITDA and market
values to determine the approximate total enterprise
value of a company.
Adjusted EBITDA removes the effect of “impairment
charges”. These charges are not reflective of our ability
to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow
and therefore this adjustment will result in a more
meaningful valuation measure for investors and analysts
to evaluate our performance in the period and assess our
future ability to generate liquidity.
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are intended to provide
additional information to investors and analysts and do
not have any standardized definition under IFRS and
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute
for measures of performance prepared in accordance
with IFRS. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA exclude the
impact of cash costs of financing activities and taxes,
and the effects of changes in operating working capital
balances, and therefore is not necessarily indicative of
operating profit or cash flow from operations as
determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA differently.
67
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following table provides a reconciliation of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA to net earnings.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to EBITDA
($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars)
2013
20121
2011
2013
20121
For the years
ended Dec. 31
For the three months
ended Dec. 31
Net earnings
Income tax expense
Finance costs
Finance income
Depreciation
EBITDA
Impairment charges
Adjusted EBITDA
1. Figures are restated for the impact of new accounting standards adopted in 2013.
Realized Prices
Realized price is a non-GAAP financial measure which
excludes from sales:
n Unrealized gains and losses on non-hedge derivative
contracts;
n Unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on
provisional pricing from copper and gold sales
contracts;
n Sales attributable to ore purchase arrangements; and
n Export duties.
This measure is intended to enable management to
better understand the price realized in each reporting
period for gold and copper sales because unrealized
mark-to-market values of non-hedge gold and copper
derivatives are subject to change each period due to
changes in market factors such as market and forward
gold and copper prices so that prices ultimately realized
may differ from those recorded. The exclusion of such
unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses from the
presentation of this performance measure enables
investors to understand performance based on the
realized proceeds of selling gold and copper production.
$ (10,603)
617
589
(9)
1,775
$
(549)
(164)
121
(11)
1,753
$ 4,537
(2,287)
147
(13)
1,419
$ (2,772)
(338)
248
(2)
442
$ (3,043)
(1,491)
31
(2)
516
$
(7,631)
$ 1,150
$ 3,803
$ (2,422)
$ (3,989)
$ 13,206
$ 6,502
$ 235
$ 3,342
$ 6,228
$ 5,575
$ 7,652
$ 4,038
$
920
$ 2,239
The gains and losses on non-hedge derivatives and
receivable balances relate to instruments/balances that
mature in future periods, at which time the gains and
losses will become realized. The amounts of these gains
and losses reflect fair values based on market valuation
assumptions at the end of each period and do not
necessarily represent the amounts that will become
realized on maturity. We also exclude export duties that
are paid upon sale and netted against revenues. We
believe this provides investors and analysts with a more
accurate measure with which to compare to market gold
prices and to assess our gold sales performance. For
those reasons, management believes that this measure
provides a more accurate reflection of our past
performance and is a better indicator of its expected
performance in future periods.
The realized price measure is intended to provide
additional information, and does not have any
standardized definition under IFRS and should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures
of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The
measure is not necessarily indicative of sales as determined
under IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure
differently. The following table reconciles realized prices
to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.
68
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Reconciliation of Sales to Realized Price per ounce/per pound
($ millions, except per ounce/pound information in dollars)
For the years ended December 31
Gold
Copper
2013
2012
2011
2013
2012
2011
Sales
Sales applicable to non-controlling interests
Sales attributable to ore purchase agreement
Realized non-hedge gold/copper derivative (losses) gains
Treatment and refinement charges
Export duties
Other
$ 10,670
(589)
(46)
1
6
51
–
$ 12,564
(288)
(174)
–
6
65
–
$ 12,255
(329)
(137)
43
8
73
–
$ 1,651
–
–
(22)
126
–
–
$ 1,689
–
–
(76)
95
–
(22)
$ 1,646
–
–
(21)
68
–
–
Revenues – as adjusted
$ 10,093
$ 12,173
$ 11,913
$ 1,755
$ 1,686
$ 1,693
Ounces/pounds sold (000s ounces/millions pounds)
7,174
7,292
7,550
519
472
444
Realized gold/copper price per ounce/pound1
$ 1,407
$ 1,669
$ 1,578
$ 3.39
$ 3.57
$ 3.82
1. Realized price per ounce/pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.
69
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Glossary of Technical Terms
AUTOCLAVE: Oxidation process in which high temperatures and
pressures are applied to convert refractory sulfide mineralization
into amenable oxide ore.
BY-PRODUCT: A secondary metal or mineral product recovered in
the milling process such as silver.
CONCENTRATE: A very fine, powder-like product containing the
valuable ore mineral from which most of the waste mineral has
been eliminated.
CONTAINED OUNCES: Represents ounces in the ground before
reduction of ounces not able to be recovered by the applicable
metallurgical process.
DEVELOPMENT: Work carried out for the purpose of opening up
a mineral deposit. In an underground mine this includes shaft
sinking, crosscutting, drifting and raising. In an open pit mine,
development includes the removal of overburden.
DILUTION: The effect of waste or low-grade ore which is
unavoidably included in the mined ore, lowering the
recovered grade.
DORÉ: Unrefined gold and silver bullion bars usually consisting
of approximately 90 percent precious metals that will be further
refined to almost pure metal.
DRILLING:
Core: drilling with a hollow bit with a diamond cutting rim to
produce a cylindrical core that is used for geological study and
assays. Used in mineral exploration.
In-fill: any method of drilling intervals between existing holes,
used to provide greater geological detail and to help establish
reserve estimates.
EXPLORATION: Prospecting, sampling, mapping, diamond-drilling
and other work involved in searching for ore.
GRADE: The amount of metal in each ton of ore, expressed as
troy ounces per ton or grams per tonne for precious metals and
as a percentage for most other metals.
Cut-off grade: the minimum metal grade at which an ore
body can be economically mined (used in the calculation of
ore reserves).
Mill-head grade: metal content of mined ore going into a mill
for processing.
Recovered grade: actual metal content of ore determined
after processing.
Reserve grade: estimated metal content of an ore body, based
on reserve calculations.
70
HEAP LEACHING: A process whereby gold/copper is extracted
by “heaping” broken ore on sloping impermeable pads and
continually applying to the heaps a weak cyanide solution/
sulfuric acid which dissolves the contained gold/copper.
The gold/copper-laden solution is then collected for gold/
copper recovery.
HEAP LEACH PAD: A large impermeable foundation or pad used
as a base for ore during heap leaching.
MILL: A processing facility where ore is finely ground and
thereafter undergoes physical or chemical treatment to extract
the valuable metals.
MINERAL RESERVE: See pages 149 to 156 – Summary Gold/
Copper Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources.
MINERAL RESOURCE: See pages 149 to 156 – Summary Gold/
Copper Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources.
MINING RATE: Tons of ore mined per day or even specified
time period.
OPEN PIT: A mine where the minerals are mined entirely from
the surface.
ORE: Rock, generally containing metallic or non-metallic
minerals, which can be mined and processed at a profit.
ORE BODY: A sufficiently large amount of ore that can be mined
economically.
OUNCES: Troy ounces of a fineness of 999.9 parts per 1,000 parts.
RECLAMATION: The process by which lands disturbed as a result
of mining activity are modified to support beneficial land use.
Reclamation activity may include the removal of buildings,
equipment, machinery and other physical remnants of mining,
closure of tailings storage facilities, leach pads and other mine
features, and contouring, covering and re-vegetation of waste
rock and other disturbed areas.
RECOVERY RATE: A term used in process metallurgy to indicate
the proportion of valuable material physically recovered in
the processing of ore. It is generally stated as a percentage
of the material recovered compared to the total material
originally present.
REFINING: The final stage of metal production in which
impurities are removed from the molten metal.
STRIPPING: Removal of overburden or waste rock overlying
an ore body in preparation for mining by open pit methods.
Expressed as the total number of tons mined or to be mined
for each ounce of gold or pound of copper.
TAILINGS: The material that remains after all economically and
technically recoverable precious metals have been removed
from the ore during processing.
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Management’s Responsibility
Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Board
of Directors and Management of the Company.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and reflect Management’s best estimates and
judgments based on currently available information. The Company has developed and maintains a system of internal
controls in order to ensure, on a reasonable and cost effective basis, the reliability of its financial information.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants.
Their report outlines the scope of their examination and opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
Ammar Al-Joundi
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Toronto, Canada
February 12, 2014
71
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITYBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
Barrick’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting.
Barrick’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at
December 31, 2013. Barrick’s Management used the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) as issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of Barrick’s
internal control over financial reporting. Based on management’s assessment, Barrick’s internal control over financial
reporting is effective as at December 31, 2013.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2013 has
been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as stated in their report which is located on
pages 73–74 of Barrick’s 2013 Annual Financial Statements.
72
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Independent Auditor’s Report
Independent Auditor’s Report
February 12, 2014
To the Shareholders of
Barrick Gold Corporation
We have completed integrated audits of Barrick Gold Corporation’s 2013 and 2012 consolidated financial statements
and its internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2013. Our opinions, based on our audits are
presented below.
Report on the consolidated financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Barrick Gold Corporation, which comprise
the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012 and the
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flow and changes in equity for the years ended
December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the related notes.
Management’s responsibility for the consolidated financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB) and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of
consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material
misstatement. Canadian generally accepted auditing standards also require that we comply with ethical requirements.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence, on a test basis, about the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment,
including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due
to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s
preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting principles and
policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Barrick Gold Corporation as at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012 and its financial
performance and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 in accordance with
IFRS as issued by the IASB.
73
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORTBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Emphasis of matter
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2013, the entity adopted new
accounting guidance, International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee Interpretation 20, Stripping Costs
in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Report on internal control over financial reporting
We have also audited Barrick Gold Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2013,
based on criteria established in Internal Control − Integrated Framework (1992), issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Management’s responsibility for internal control over financial reporting
Management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects.
An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control, based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
consider necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our audit opinion on the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
Definition of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Inherent limitations
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Opinion
In our opinion, Barrick Gold Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as at December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control − Integrated Framework (1992)
issued by COSO.
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
74
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Consolidated Statements of Income
Barrick Gold Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States dollars, except per share data)
Revenue (notes 5 and 6)
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (notes 5 and 7)
General and administrative expenses (note 10)
Exploration and evaluation (notes 5 and 8)
Other expense (income) (note 9a)
Impairment charges (note 9b)
Loss from equity investees (note 15a)
Gain on non-hedge derivatives (note 24e)
Loss before finance items and income taxes
Finance items
Finance income
Finance costs (note 13)
Loss before income taxes
Income tax (expense) recovery (note 11)
Loss from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations (note 4b)
Net loss
Attributable to:
Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation
Non-controlling interests (note 31)
Earnings per share data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation (note 12)
Loss from continuing operations
Basic
Diluted
Loss from discontinued operations
Basic
Diluted
Net loss
Basic
Diluted
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2012
(restated –
note 2y)
2013
$ 12,511
$ 14,394
7,243
390
208
878
12,687
–
(76)
7,257
503
359
303
6,294
12
(31)
(8,819)
(303)
9
(657)
(9,467)
(630)
(10,097)
(506)
11
(174)
(466)
102
(364)
(185)
$(10,603)
$
(549)
$(10,366)
(237)
$
$(10,603)
$
$
$
(538)
(11)
(549)
$
$
(9.65)
(9.65)
$
$
(0.35)
(0.35)
$
$
(0.49)
(0.49)
$
$
(0.19)
(0.19)
$ (10.14)
$ (10.14)
$
$
(0.54)
(0.54)
75
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income
Barrick Gold Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States dollars)
Net loss
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale (“AFS”) financial securities, net of tax $6, $6
Realized (gains) losses and impairments on AFS financial securities, net of tax ($3), ($6)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative investments designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax ($7), ($20)
Realized (gains) losses on derivative investments designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax $73, $96
Currency translation adjustments gain (loss), net of tax $nil, $nil
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:
Remeasurement gains (losses) of post-employment benefit obligations, net of tax ($13), $3
Total other comprehensive loss
Total comprehensive loss
Attributable to:
Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Non-controlling interests
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2012
(restated –
note 2y)
2013
$ (10,603)
$ (549)
(68)
17
(63)
(325)
(93)
24
(508)
$ (11,111)
(37)
34
167
(331)
35
(5)
(137)
$ (686)
$ (10,337)
(537)
$
(237)
$
$ (525)
$ (149)
$ (12)
76
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
Barrick Gold Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States dollars)
Operating Activities
Net loss
Adjustments for the following items:
Depreciation
Finance costs (excludes accretion)
Impairment charges (note 9b)
Income tax expense (recovery) (note 11)
Increase in inventory
Proceeds from settlement of hedge contracts
Gain on non-hedge derivatives (note 24e)
Gain on sale of long-lived assets/investments
Other operating activities (note 14a)
Operating cash flows before interest and income taxes
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations
Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing Activities
Property, plant and equipment
Capital expenditures (note 5)
Sales proceeds
Acquisitions
Divestitures (note 4)
Investment sales
Other investing activities (note 14b)
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations
Net cash used in investing activities
Financing Activities
Capital stock
Proceeds on exercise of stock options
Proceeds on common share offering (note 30)
Debt (note 24b)
Proceeds
Repayments
Dividends (note 30)
Funding from non-controlling interests (note 31)
Deposit on silver sale agreement (note 28)
Other financing activities (note 14c)
Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued operations
Net cash provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year (note 24a)
Cash and equivalents at the end of year (note 24a)
Less cash and equivalents of assets classified as held for sale at the end of year
2012
(restated –
note 2y)
2013
$ (10,097)
$
(364)
1,732
589
12,687
630
(352)
219
(76)
(41)
669
5,960
(662)
(1,109)
4,189
50
4,239
(5,501)
50
–
522
18
(262)
(5,173)
(64)
1,651
121
6,294
(102)
(360)
450
(31)
(18)
(283)
7,358
(118)
(1,459)
5,781
202
5,983
(6,773)
18
(37)
–
168
(311)
(6,935)
(130)
(5,237)
(7,065)
1
2,910
5,414
(6,412)
(508)
55
–
(118)
1,342
–
1,342
(17)
327
2,097
18
–
2,000
(1,393)
(750)
505
137
(25)
492
(69)
423
7
(652)
2,749
$ 2,424
$ 2,097
20
–
Cash and equivalents excluding assets classified as held for sale at the end of year
$ 2,404
$ 2,097
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
77
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Barrick Gold Corporation
(in millions of United States dollars)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and equivalents (note 24a)
Accounts receivable (note 17)
Inventories (note 16)
Other current assets (note 17)
Total current assets (excluding assets classified as held for sale)
Assets classified as held for sale
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Equity in investees (note 15a)
Other investments (note 15b)
Property, plant and equipment (note 18)
Goodwill (note 19a)
Intangible assets (note 19b)
Deferred income tax assets (note 29)
Non-current portion of inventory (note 16)
Other assets (note 21)
Total assets
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable (note 22)
Debt (note 24b)
Current income tax liabilities
Other current liabilities (note 23)
Total current liabilities (excluding liabilities classified as held for sale)
Liabilities classified as held for sale
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Debt (note 24b)
Provisions (note 26)
Deferred income tax liabilities (note 29)
Other liabilities (note 28)
Total liabilities
Equity
Capital stock (note 30)
Retained earnings (deficit)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Other
Total equity attributable to Barrick Gold Corporation shareholders
Non-controlling interests (note 31)
Total equity
Contingencies and commitments (notes 16, 18 and 35)
Total liabilities and equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Signed on behalf of the Board,
Jamie C. Sokalsky, Director
Steven J. Shapiro, Director
78
As at
December 31,
2012
(restated –
note 2y)
As at
December 31,
2013
As at
January 1,
2012
(restated –
note 2y)
$ 2,404
385
2,679
421
5,889
323
6,212
27
120
21,688
5,835
320
501
1,679
1,066
$ 37,448
2,165
179
75
303
2,722
162
2,884
12,901
2,428
2,258
976
21,447
20,869
(7,581)
(69)
314
13,533
2,468
16,001
$ 2,097
449
2,585
626
5,757
–
5,757
20
78
29,277
8,837
453
437
1,555
1,064
$ 2,749
426
2,498
876
6,549
–
6,549
341
161
29,076
9,626
569
409
1,153
1,002
$ 47,478
$ 48,886
2,267
1,848
41
261
4,417
–
4,417
12,095
2,812
2,668
850
22,842
17,926
3,269
463
314
21,972
2,664
24,636
2,085
196
306
326
2,913
–
2,913
13,173
2,326
4,231
689
23,332
17,892
4,562
595
314
23,363
2,191
25,554
$ 37,448
$ 47,478
$ 48,886
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Consolidated Statements
of Changes in Equity
Barrick Gold Corporation
(in millions of United States dollars)
Common Shares
(in thousands) Capital stock
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)1 Other2
Total equity
attributable to
shareholders
Non-
controlling
interests
Total
equity
At January 1, 2013 (restated – note 2y)
1,001,108
$ 17,926 $ 3,269
$ 463 $ 314
$ 21,972 $ 2,664 $ 24,636
Attributable to equity holders of the company
Net loss
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Total comprehensive loss
Transactions with owners
Dividends
–
–
–
–
–
(10,366)
24
–
(532)
$
– $ (10,342)
$ (532) $
Issued on public equity offering
Issued on exercise of stock options
Recognition of stock option expense
Funding from non-controlling interests
Other decrease in non-controlling interests
–
163,500
44
–
–
–
–
2,934
1
8
–
–
(508)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(10,366)
(508)
(237) (10,603)
(508)
–
$ (10,874) $ (237) $ (11,111)
(508)
2,934
1
8
–
–
–
–
–
–
55
(14)
(508)
2,934
1
8
55
(14)
Total transactions with owners
163,544
$ 2,943 $
(508)
$
– $
–
$ 2,435 $
41 $ 2,476
At December 31, 2013
1,164,652
$ 20,869 $ (7,581)
$
(69) $ 314
$ 13,533 $ 2,468 $ 16,001
At January 1, 2012 (restated – note 2y)
1,000,423
$ 17,892 $ 4,562
$ 595 $ 314
$ 23,363 $ 2,191 $ 25,554
Net loss
Total other comprehensive loss
Total comprehensive loss
Transactions with owners
Dividends
Issued on exercise of stock options
Recognition of stock option expense
Funding from non-controlling interests
Other decrease in non-controlling interests
–
–
–
–
685
–
–
–
–
–
(538)
(5)
–
(132)
–
–
(538)
(137)
(11)
–
(549)
(137)
$
– $
(543)
$ (132) $
–
$
(675) $
(11) $
(686)
–
18
16
–
–
(750)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(750)
18
16
–
–
–
–
–
505
(21)
(750)
18
16
505
(21)
$
(716) $ 484 $
(232)
Total transactions with owners
685
$
34 $
(750)
$
– $
At December 31, 2012 (restated – note 2y)
1,001,108
$ 17,926 $ 3,269
$ 463 $ 314
$ 21,972 $ 2,664 $ 24,636
1. Includes cumulative translation adjustments as at December 31, 2013: $80 million loss (2012: $13 million).
2. Includes additional paid-in capital as at December 31, 2013: $276 million (December 31, 2012: $276 million) and convertible borrowings – equity component as at
December 31, 2013: $38 million (December 31, 2012: $38 million).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
79
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Barrick Gold Corporation. Tabular dollar amounts in millions of United States dollars, unless otherwise shown. References to A$, ARS, C$, CLP,
EUR, GBP, JPY, PGK, TZS, ZAR, and ZMW are to Australian dollars, Argentinean pesos, Canadian dollars, Chilean pesos, Euros, British pound sterling,
Japanese yen, Papua New Guinea kina, Tanzanian shillings, South African rand, and Zambian kwacha, respectively.
1 Corporate Information
Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick” or the “Company”)
is a corporation governed by the Business Corporations
Act (Ontario). The Company’s head and registered office
is located at Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower,
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1.
We are principally engaged in the production and sale
of gold and copper, as well as related activities such as
exploration and mine development. Our producing
gold mines are concentrated in seven operating units:
Goldstrike, Cortez, Pueblo Viejo, Lagunas Norte,
Veladero, North America – Other and Australia Pacific.
We also hold a 73.9% equity interest in African Barrick
Gold plc (“ABG”), a company listed on the London
Stock Exchange that owns gold mines and exploration
properties in Africa. Our Copper business unit contains
producing copper mines located in Chile and Zambia and
a mine under construction located in Saudi Arabia. We
also have one project located in South America. We sell
our gold and copper production into the world market.
2 Significant Accounting Policies
a) Statement of Compliance
These consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) under the historical
cost convention, as modified by revaluation of derivative
contracts and certain financial assets. Accounting policies
are consistently applied to all years presented, unless
otherwise stated. Certain items have been reclassified in
the current year. The prior periods have been restated to
reflect the change in presentation. These consolidated
financial statements were approved for issuance by the
Board of Directors on February 12, 2014.
b) Basis of Preparation
Subsidiaries
These consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Barrick and its subsidiaries. All intercompany
balances, transactions, income and expenses, and profits
80
or losses have been eliminated on consolidation. We
consolidate subsidiaries where we have the ability to
exercise control. Control of an investee is defined to
exist when we are exposed to variable returns from our
involvement with the investee and have the ability to
affect those returns through our power over the
investee. Specifically, we control an investee if, and only
if, we have all of the following: power over the investee
(i.e., existing rights that give us the current ability to
direct the relevant activities of the investee); exposure,
or rights, to variable returns from our involvement with
the investee; and the ability to use our power over
the investee to affect its returns. For non wholly-owned,
controlled subsidiaries, the net assets attributable
to outside equity shareholders are presented as “non-
controlling interests” in the equity section of the
consolidated balance sheet. Profit for the period that
is attributable to non-controlling interests is calculated
based on the ownership of the minority shareholders
in the subsidiary.
Joint Arrangements
A joint arrangement is defined as one over which two
or more parties have joint control, which is the
contractually agreed sharing of control over an
arrangement. This exists only when the decisions about
the relevant activities (being those that significantly
affect the returns of the arrangement) require the
unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. There
are two types of joint arrangements, joint operations
(“JO”) and joint ventures (“JV”).
A JO is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that
have joint control of the arrangement have rights to
the assets and obligations for the liabilities, relating to
the arrangement. In relation to our interests in joint
operations, we recognize our share of any assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of the JO.
A JV is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that
have joint control of the arrangement have rights to
the net assets of the joint venture. Our investment in
the JV is accounted for using the equity method.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 On acquisition, an equity method investment is
initially recognized at cost. The carrying amount of equity
method investments includes goodwill identified on
acquisition, net of any accumulated impairment losses.
The carrying amount is adjusted by our share of post-
acquisition net income or loss, depreciation, amortization
or impairment of the fair value adjustments made at the
date of acquisition, dividends, cash contributions and our
share of post-acquisition movements in Other
Comprehensive Income (“OCI”).
Associates
An associate is an entity over which the investor has
significant influence but not control and that is neither
a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint arrangement.
Significant influence is presumed to exist where the
Company has between 20% and 50% of the voting
rights, but can also arise where the Company has less
than 20% if we have the power to be actively involved
and influential in policy decisions affecting the entity.
Our share of the net assets and net income or loss is
accounted for in the consolidated financial statements
using the equity method of accounting.
Outlined below is information related to our joint arrangements and entities other than 100% owned Barrick
subsidiaries at December 31, 2013:
Place of business
Entity type
Economic interest1
Method2
Marigold Mine3
Round Mountain Mine
Turquoise Ridge Mine3
Kalgoorlie Mine
Porgera Mine
African Barrick Gold plc4
Pueblo Viejo4
Cerro Casale Project4
Donlin Gold Project
Kabanga Project5
United States
United States
United States
Australia
Papua New Guinea
Tanzania
Dominican Republic
Chile
United States
Tanzania
JO
JO
JO
JO
JO
Subsidiary, publicly traded
Subsidiary
Subsidiary
JO
JV
33%
50%
75%
50%
95%
73.9%
60%
75%
50%
50%
Our share
Our share
Our share
Our share
Our share
Consolidation
Consolidation
Consolidation
Our share
Equity Method
1. Unless otherwise noted, all of our joint arrangements are funded by contributions made by their partners in proportion to their economic interest.
2. For our JOs, we recognize our share of any assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the JO.
3. We have joint control given that decisions about relevant activities require unanimous consent of the parties to the joint operation.
4. We consolidate our interests in Pueblo Viejo, Cerro Casale and ABG and record a non-controlling interest for the 40%, 25% and 26.1%, respectively,
that we do not own.
5. Our JV is an early stage exploration project and, as such, does not have any significant assets, liabilities, income, contractual commitments or contingencies.
Expenses are recognized through our equity pick-up (loss). Refer to note 15 for further details.
c) Business Combinations
On the acquisition of a business, the acquisition
method of accounting is used, whereby the purchase
consideration is allocated to the identifiable assets and
liabilities on the basis of fair value at the date of
acquisition. Provisional fair values allocated at a reporting
date are finalized as soon as the relevant information is
available, within a period not to exceed twelve months
from the acquisition date with retroactive restatement of
the impact of adjustments to those provisional fair values
effective as at the acquisition date. Incremental costs
related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred.
When the amount of purchase consideration is
contingent on future events, the initial cost of the
acquisition recorded includes an estimate of the fair
value of the contingent amounts expected to be payable
in the future. When the fair value of contingent
consideration as at the date of acquisition is finalized
before the purchase price allocation is finalized, the
adjustment is allocated to the identifiable assets and
liabilities acquired. Subsequent changes to the estimated
fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in the
consolidated statement of income.
81
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
When the cost of the acquisition exceeds the
fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired, the
difference is recorded as goodwill. If the fair value
attributable to Barrick’s share of the identifiable net
assets exceeds the cost of acquisition, the difference
is recognized as a gain in the consolidated statement
of income.
environment in which it operates. The functional
currency of all of our operations is the US dollar. We
translate non-US dollar balances for these operations
into US dollars as follows:
Property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”), intangible
assets and equity method investments using the rates
at the time of acquisition;
Non-controlling interests represent the fair value of
Available-for-sale securities using the closing exchange
net assets in subsidiaries, as at the date of acquisition,
that are not held by Barrick and are presented in the
equity section of the consolidated balance sheet.
When control of a subsidiary is acquired in stages,
its carrying value prior to the acquisition of control is
compared with the fair value of the identifiable net
assets at that date. If fair value is greater than/less than
carrying value, gain/loss is recorded in the consolidated
statement of income.
d) Non-current Assets and Disposal Groups Held
for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as
assets held for sale (“HFS”) if it is highly probable that
they will be recovered primarily through sale rather than
through continuing use. They are recorded at the lower
of carrying amount and fair value less cost of disposal.
Impairment losses on initial classification as HFS and
subsequent gains and losses on remeasurement are
recognized in the income statement. Once classified as
held for sale, property, plant and equipment are no
longer amortized. The assets and liabilities are presented
as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet when
the sale is highly probable, the asset or disposal group is
available for immediate sale in its present condition and
management is committed to the sale, which should
be expected to be completed within one year from the
date of classification. Results of operations and any
gain or loss from disposal are excluded from income
before finance items and income taxes and are reported
separately as income/loss from discontinued operations.
A discontinued operation is a component of the
Company that can be clearly distinguished from the rest
of the Company, both operationally and for financial
reporting purposes, and is expected to be recovered
primarily through sale rather than continuing use.
e) Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of the Company, for each
subsidiary of the Company, and for joint arrangements
and associates, is the currency of the primary economic
rate as at the balance sheet date with translation
gains and losses recorded in OCI;
Deferred tax assets and liabilities using the closing
exchange rate as at the balance sheet date with
translation gains and losses recorded in income
tax expense;
Other assets and liabilities using the closing exchange
rate as at the balance sheet date with translation gains
and losses recorded in other income/expense; and
Income and expenses using the average exchange
rate for the period, except for expenses that relate
to non-monetary assets and liabilities measured at
historical rates, which are translated using the same
historical rate as the associated non-monetary assets
and liabilities.
f) Revenue Recognition
We record revenue when evidence exists that all of the
following criteria are met:
The significant risks and rewards of ownership of
the product have been transferred to the buyer;
Neither continuing managerial involvement to
the degree usually associated with ownership,
nor effective control over the goods sold, has
been retained;
The amount of revenue can be reliably measured;
It is probable that the economic benefits associated
with the sale will flow to us; and
The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the
sale can be reliably measured.
These conditions are generally satisfied when title passes
to the customer.
Gold Bullion Sales
Gold bullion is sold primarily in the London spot market.
The sales price is fixed at the delivery date based on the
gold spot price. Generally, we record revenue from gold
bullion sales at the time of physical delivery, which is also
the date that title to the gold passes.
82
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Concentrate Sales
Under the terms of concentrate sales contracts with
independent smelting companies, gold and copper sales
prices are provisionally set on a specified future date
after shipment based on market prices. We record
revenues under these contracts at the time of shipment,
which is also when the risk and rewards of ownership
pass to the smelting companies, using forward market
gold and copper prices on the expected date that final
sales prices will be determined. Variations between the
price recorded at the shipment date and the actual final
price set under the smelting contracts are caused by
changes in market gold and copper prices, which result
in the existence of an embedded derivative in accounts
receivable. The embedded derivative is recorded at fair
value each period until final settlement occurs, with
changes in fair value classified as provisional price
adjustments and included in revenue in the consolidated
statement of income.
Copper Cathode Sales
Under the terms of copper cathode sales contracts,
copper sales prices are provisionally set on a specified
future date based upon market commodity prices plus
certain price adjustments. Revenue is recognized at the
time of shipment, which is also when the risks and
rewards of ownership pass to the customer. Revenue
is provisionally measured using forward market prices
on the expected date that final selling prices will be
determined. Variations occur between the price recorded
on the date of revenue recognition and the actual final
price under the terms of the contracts due to changes
in market copper prices, which result in the existence of
an embedded derivative in accounts receivable. This
embedded derivative is recorded at fair value each period
until final settlement occurs, with changes in fair value
classified as provisional price adjustments and included
in revenue in the consolidated statement of income.
g) Exploration and Evaluation (“E&E”)
Exploration expenditures are the costs incurred in the
initial search for mineral deposits with economic potential
or in the process of obtaining more information about
existing mineral deposits. Exploration expenditures
typically include costs associated with prospecting,
sampling, mapping, diamond drilling and other work
involved in searching for ore.
Evaluation expenditures are the costs incurred
to establish the technical and commercial viability of
developing mineral deposits identified through
exploration activities or by acquisition. Evaluation
expenditures include the cost of (i) establishing the
volume and grade of deposits through drilling of core
samples, trenching and sampling activities in an ore body
that is classified as either a mineral resource or a proven
and probable reserve; (ii) determining the optimal
methods of extraction and metallurgical and treatment
processes; (iii) studies related to surveying, transportation
and infrastructure requirements; (iv) permitting activities;
and (v) economic evaluations to determine whether
development of the mineralized material is commercially
justified, including scoping, prefeasibility and final
feasibility studies.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures are
capitalized if management determines that probable
future economic benefits will be generated as a result of
the expenditures.
Cash flows attributable to capitalized exploration
and evaluation expenditures are classified as investing
activities in the consolidated statements of cash flow.
h) Earnings per Share
Earnings per share is computed by dividing net income
available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential
dilution that could occur if additional common shares
are assumed to be issued under securities that entitle
their holders to obtain common shares in the future.
For stock options, the number of additional shares for
inclusion in diluted earnings per share calculations is
determined using the treasury stock method. Under this
method, stock options, whose exercise price is less than
the average market price of our common shares, are
assumed to be exercised and the proceeds are used to
repurchase common shares at the average market price
for the period. The incremental number of common
shares issued under stock options and repurchased
from proceeds is included in the calculation of diluted
earnings per share.
83
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 i) Taxation
Current tax for each taxable entity is based on the local
taxable income at the local statutory tax rate enacted
or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and
includes adjustments to tax payable or recoverable in
respect of previous periods.
Deferred tax is recognized using the balance sheet
method in respect of all temporary differences between
the tax bases of assets and liabilities, and their carrying
amounts for financial reporting purposes, except as
indicated below.
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognized for all
taxable temporary differences, except:
Where the deferred income tax liability arises from the
initial recognition of goodwill, or the initial recognition
of an asset or liability in an acquisition that is not
a business combination and, at the time of the
acquisition, affects neither the accounting profit nor
taxable profit or loss; and
In respect of taxable temporary differences associated
with investments in subsidiaries and interests in
joint ventures, where the timing of the reversal of
the temporary differences can be controlled and
it is probable that the temporary differences will not
reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all
deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward
of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent
that it is probable that taxable profit will be available
against which the deductible temporary differences and
the carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax
losses can be utilized, except:
Where the deferred income tax asset relating to the
deductible temporary difference arises from the initial
recognition of an asset or liability in an acquisition
that is not a business combination and, at the time
of the acquisition, affects neither the accounting
profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
In respect of deductible temporary differences
associated with investments in subsidiaries and interests
in joint ventures, deferred tax assets are recognized
only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary
differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and
taxable profit will be available against which the
temporary differences can be utilized.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is
reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the
extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable
profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred
income tax asset to be utilized. To the extent that an
asset not previously recognized fulfills the criteria for
recognition, a deferred income tax asset is recorded.
Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis
at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods
in which the asset is realized or the liability is settled,
based on tax rates and tax laws enacted or substantively
enacted at the balance sheet date.
Current and deferred tax relating to items recognized
directly in equity are recognized in equity and not in the
income statement.
Royalties and Special Mining Taxes
Income tax expense includes the cost of royalty and
special mining taxes payable to governments that are
calculated based on a percentage of taxable profit
whereby taxable profit represents net income adjusted
for certain items defined in the applicable legislation.
Indirect Taxes
Indirect tax recoverable is recorded at their undiscounted
amount, and are disclosed as non-current if not expected
to be recovered within twelve months.
j) Other Investments
Investments in publicly quoted equity securities that are
neither subsidiaries nor associates are categorized as
available-for-sale. Available-for-sale equity investments
are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and
losses recorded in OCI. Realized gains and losses are
recorded in earnings when investments are sold and are
calculated using the average carrying amount of
securities sold.
If the fair value of an investment declines below
the carrying amount, we undertake qualitative and
quantitative assessments of whether the impairment is
either significant or prolonged. If an unrealized loss
on an available-for-sale investment has been recognized
in OCI and it is deemed to be either significant or
prolonged, any cumulative loss that had been recognized
in OCI is reclassified as an impairment loss in the
consolidated statement of income. The reclassification
adjustment is calculated as the difference between
the acquisition cost and current fair value, less any
84
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 impairment loss on that financial asset previously
recognized. If the value of a previously impaired available-
for-sale equity investment subsequently recovers,
additional unrealized gains are recorded in OCI and the
previously recorded impairment losses are not reversed
through the consolidated statement of income.
k) Inventory
Material extracted from our mines is classified as either
ore or waste. Ore represents material that, at the time
of extraction, we expect to process into a saleable form
and sell at a profit. Raw materials are comprised of both
ore in stockpiles and ore on leach pads as processing
is required to extract benefit from the ore. Ore is
accumulated in stockpiles that are subsequently
processed into gold/copper in a saleable form. The
recovery of gold and copper from certain oxide ores is
achieved through the heap leaching process. Work in
process represents gold/copper in the processing circuit
that has not completed the production process, and is
not yet in a saleable form. Finished goods inventory
represents gold/copper in saleable form. Mine operating
supplies represent commodity consumables and other
raw materials used in the production process, as well as
spare parts and other maintenance supplies that are not
classified as capital items.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net
realizable value. Cost is determined on a weighted
average basis and includes all costs incurred, based on
a normal production capacity, in bringing each product
to its present location and condition. Cost of inventories
comprises direct labor, materials and contractor expenses,
including non-capitalized stripping costs; depreciation
on PP&E including capitalized stripping costs; and an
allocation of mine site overhead costs. As ore is removed
for processing, costs are removed based on the average
cost per ounce/pound in the stockpile.
We record provisions to reduce inventory to net
realizable value to reflect changes in economic factors
that impact inventory value and to reflect present
intentions for the use of slow moving and obsolete
supplies inventory. Net realizable value is determined with
reference to relevant market prices less applicable
variable selling expenses. Provisions recorded also reflect
an estimate of the remaining costs of completion to
bring the inventory into its saleable form. Provisions are
also recorded to reduce mine operating supplies to
net realizable value, which is generally calculated by
reference to its salvage or scrap value, when it is
determined that the supplies are obsolete. Provisions
are reversed to reflect subsequent recoveries in net
realizable value where the inventory is still on hand.
l) Production Stage
We assess each mine construction project to determine
when a mine moves into production stage. The criteria
used to assess the start date are determined based on
the nature of each mine construction project, such as the
complexity of a plant or its location. We consider various
relevant criteria to assess when the mine is substantially
complete and ready for its intended use and moved into
the production stage. Some of the criteria considered
would include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) the level of capital expenditures compared to
construction cost estimates; (2) the completion of a
reasonable period of testing of mine plant and equipment;
(3) the ability to produce minerals in saleable form
(within specifications); and (4) the ability to sustain
ongoing production of minerals.
When a mine construction project moves into the
production stage, the capitalization of certain mine
construction costs ceases and costs are either capitalized
to inventory or expensed, except for capitalizable costs
related to property, plant and equipment additions or
improvements, open pit stripping activities that provide
a future benefit, underground mine development or E&E
expenditures that meet the criteria for capitalization.
Pre-production stripping costs are capitalized until an
“other than de minimis” level of mineral is extracted,
after which time such costs are either capitalized to
inventory or, if it qualifies as an open pit stripping activity
that provides a future benefit, to PP&E. We consider
various relevant criteria to assess when an “other than
de minimis” level of mineral is produced. Some of the
criteria considered would include, but are not limited to,
the following: (1) the amount of minerals mined versus
total ounces in life of mine (“LOM”) ore; (2) the amount
of ore tons mined versus total LOM expected ore tons
mined; (3) the current stripping ratio versus the LOM
strip ratio; and (4) the ore grade versus the LOM grade.
85
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 m) Property, Plant and Equipment
Buildings, Plant and Equipment
At acquisition, we record buildings, plant and equipment
at cost, including all expenditures incurred to prepare
an asset for its intended use. These expenditures consist
of: the purchase price; brokers’ commissions; and
installation costs including architectural, design and
engineering fees, legal fees, survey costs, site preparation
costs, freight charges, transportation insurance costs,
duties, testing and preparation charges.
We capitalize costs that meet the asset recognition
criteria. Costs incurred that do not extend the productive
capacity or useful economic life of an asset are considered
repairs and maintenance expense and are accounted for
as a cost of the inventory produced in the period.
Buildings, plant and equipment are depreciated over
their expected useful life, which commences when the
assets are considered available for use. Once buildings,
plant and equipment are considered available for use
they are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation
and applicable impairment losses.
Depreciation on equipment utilized in the
development of assets, including open pit and
underground mine development, is recapitalized as
development costs attributable to the related asset.
Estimated Useful Lives of Major Asset Categories
Buildings, plant and equipment
Underground mobile equipment
Light vehicles and other mobile equipment
Furniture, computer and office equipment
5 – 29 years
5 – 7 years
2 – 3 years
2 – 3 years
Leasing Arrangements
The determination of whether an arrangement is, or
contains, a lease is based on the substance of the
arrangement at inception date, including whether the
fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use
of a specific asset or assets or whether the arrangement
conveys a right to use the asset.
Leasing arrangements that transfer substantially all
the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to Barrick
are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are
recorded as an asset with a corresponding liability at an
amount equal to the lower of the fair value of the leased
property and the present value of the minimum lease
payments. Each lease payment is allocated between the
liability and finance costs using the effective interest
method, whereby a constant rate of interest expense is
recognized on the balance of the liability outstanding.
The interest element of the lease is charged to the
consolidated statement of income as a finance cost.
PP&E assets acquired under finance leases are
depreciated, over the shorter of the useful life of the
asset and the lease term.
All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Operating lease payments are recognized as an operating
cost in the consolidated statements of income on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.
Mineral Properties
Mineral properties consist of: the fair value attributable
to mineral reserves and resources acquired in a business
combination or asset acquisition; underground mine
development costs; open pit mine development costs;
capitalized exploration and evaluation costs; and
capitalized interest.
i) Acquired Mining Properties
On acquisition of a mining property we prepare an
estimate of the fair value attributable to the proven and
probable mineral reserves, mineral resources and
exploration potential attributable to the property. The
estimated fair value attributable to the mineral reserves
and the portion of mineral resources considered to be
probable of economic extraction at the time of the
acquisition is depreciated on a units of production
(“UOP”) basis whereby the denominator is the proven
and probable reserves and the portion of mineral
resources considered to be probable of economic
extraction. The estimated fair value attributable to
mineral resources that are not considered to be probable
of economic extraction at the time of the acquisition is
not subject to depreciation, until the resources become
probable of economic extraction in the future. The
estimated fair value attributable to exploration licenses
is recorded as an intangible asset and is not subject to
depreciation until the property enters production.
ii) Underground Mine Development Costs
At our underground mines, we incur development costs
to build new shafts, drifts and ramps that will enable
us to physically access ore underground. The time over
which we will continue to incur these costs depends
on the mine life. These underground development costs
are capitalized as incurred.
Capitalized underground development costs incurred
to enable access to specific ore blocks or areas of the
underground mine, and which only provide an economic
86
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 benefit over the period of mining that ore block or area,
are depreciated on a UOP basis, whereby the denominator
is estimated ounces/pounds of gold/copper in proven
and probable reserves and the portion of resources
within that ore block or area that is considered probable
of economic extraction.
If capitalized underground development costs
provide an economic benefit over the entire mine life,
the costs are depreciated on a UOP basis, whereby the
denominator is the estimated ounces/pounds of gold/
copper in total accessible proven and probable reserves
and the portion of resources that is considered probable
of economic extraction.
iii) Open Pit Mining Costs
In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove
overburden and other waste materials to access ore
from which minerals can be extracted economically. The
process of mining overburden and waste materials is
referred to as stripping. Stripping costs incurred in order
to provide initial access to the ore body (referred to as
pre-production stripping) are capitalized as open pit mine
development costs.
Stripping costs incurred during the production stage
of a pit are accounted for as costs of the inventory
produced during the period that the stripping costs are
incurred, unless these costs are expected to provide a
future economic benefit to an identifiable component
of the ore body. Production phase stripping costs
generate a future economic benefit when the related
stripping activity: (i) improves access to a component of
the ore body to be mined in the future; (ii) increases
the fair value of the mine (or pit) as access to future
mineral reserves becomes less costly; and (iii) increases
the productive capacity or extends the productive life of
the mine (or pit). Production phase stripping costs that
are expected to generate a future economic benefit are
capitalized as open pit mine development costs.
Capitalized open pit mine development costs are
depreciated on a UOP basis whereby the denominator
is the estimated ounces/pounds of gold/copper in
proven and probable reserves and the portion of
resources considered probable of economic extraction
based on the current LOM plan in the components of
the ore body that have been made more accessible
through the stripping activity. Capitalized open pit mine
development costs are depreciated once the open pit
has entered production and the future economic benefit
is being derived.
Construction-in-Progress
Assets under construction at operating mines are
capitalized as construction-in-progress. The cost of
construction-in-progress comprises its purchase price and
any costs directly attributable to bringing it into working
condition for its intended use. Construction-in-progress
amounts related to development projects are included
in the carrying amount of the development project.
Construction-in-progress amounts incurred at operating
mines are presented as a separate asset within PP&E.
Construction-in-progress also includes deposits on long
lead items. Construction-in-progress is not depreciated.
Depreciation commences once the asset is complete
and available for use.
Capitalized Interest
We capitalize interest costs for qualifying assets.
Qualifying assets are assets that require a significant
amount of time to prepare for their intended use,
including projects that are in the exploration and
evaluation, development or construction stages.
Qualifying assets also include significant expansion
projects at our operating mines. Capitalized interest
costs are considered an element of the cost of the
qualifying asset which is determined based on gross
expenditures incurred on an asset. Capitalization ceases
when the asset is substantially complete or if active
development is suspended or ceases. Where the funds
used to finance a qualifying asset form part of general
borrowings, the amount capitalized is calculated using
a weighted average of rates applicable to the relevant
borrowings during the period. Where funds borrowed
are directly attributable to a qualifying asset, the amount
capitalized represents the borrowing costs specific to
those borrowings. Where surplus funds available out
of money borrowed specifically to finance a project are
temporarily invested, the total capitalized interest is
reduced by income generated from short-term
investments of such funds.
Insurance
We record losses relating to insurable events as they
occur. Proceeds receivable from insurance coverage are
recorded at such time as receipt is receivable or virtually
certain and the amount receivable is fixed or determinable.
For business interruption the amount is only recognized
when it is virtually certain or receivable as supported by
receipt of notification of a minimum or proposed
settlement amount from the insurance adjuster.
87
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 n) Goodwill
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the costs
of business combinations are allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated
fair value at the date of acquisition. The excess of the
fair value of consideration paid over the fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill is not amortized; instead it is tested annually
for impairment at the beginning of the fourth quarter for
all of our segments. Our copper segment was previously
tested at the end of the fourth quarter. In addition, at
each reporting period we assess whether there is an
indication that goodwill is impaired and, if there is such
an indication, we would test for goodwill impairment at
that time. At the date of acquisition, goodwill is assigned
to the cash generating unit (“CGU”) or group of CGUs
that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the
business combination. For the purposes of impairment
testing, goodwill is allocated to the Company’s operating
segments, which corresponds to the level at which
goodwill is internally monitored by the Chief Operating
Decision Maker (“CODM”), the Chief Executive Officer.
The recoverable amount of an operating segment is
the higher of Value in Use (“VIU”) and Fair Value Less
Costs of Disposal (“FVLCD”). A goodwill impairment is
recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the
segment over its recoverable amount. Goodwill
impairment charges are not reversible.
o) Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired by way of an asset acquisition
or business combination are recognized if the asset
is separable or arises from contractual or legal rights
and the fair value can be measured reliably on
initial recognition.
On acquisition of a mineral property in the
exploration stage, we prepare an estimate of the fair
value attributable to the exploration licenses acquired,
including the fair value attributable to mineral resources,
if any, of that property. The fair value of the exploration
license is recorded as an intangible asset (acquired
exploration potential) as at the date of acquisition. When
an exploration stage property moves into development,
the acquired exploration potential attributable to that
property is transferred to mining interests within PP&E.
p) Impairment of Non-Current Assets
We review and test the carrying amounts of PP&E and
intangible assets with definite lives when an indicator
of impairment is considered to exist. Impairment
assessments on PP&E and intangible assets are
conducted at the level of CGU, which is the lowest level
for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent
of the cash flows of other assets. For operating mines
and projects, the individual mine/project represents a
CGU for impairment testing.
The recoverable amount of a CGU is the higher of
VIU and FVLCD. An impairment loss is recognized for
any excess of the carrying amount of a CGU over its
recoverable amount. Where it is not appropriate to
allocate the loss to a separate asset, an impairment loss
related to a CGU is allocated to the carrying amount of
the assets of the CGU on a pro rata basis based on the
carrying amount of its non-monetary assets.
Impairment Reversal
Impairment losses for PP&E and intangible assets
are reversed if the conditions that gave rise to the
impairment are no longer present and it has been
determined that the asset is no longer impaired as a
result. This reversal is recognized in the consolidated
statements of income and is limited to the carrying
value that would have been determined, net of any
depreciation where applicable, had no impairment
charge been recognized in prior years. When an
impairment reversal is undertaken, the recoverable
amount is assessed by reference to the higher of VIU
and FVLCD.
q) Debt
Debt is recognized initially at fair value, net of financing
costs incurred, and subsequently measured at amortized
cost. Any difference between the amounts originally
received and the redemption value of the debt is
recognized in the consolidated statement of income
over the period to maturity using the effective
interest method.
88
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 r) Derivative Instruments and Hedge Accounting
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments are recorded at fair value on
the consolidated balance sheet, classified based on
contractual maturity. Derivative instruments are classified
as either hedges of the fair value of recognized assets or
liabilities or of firm commitments (“fair value hedges”),
hedges of highly probable forecast transactions (“cash
flow hedges”) or non-hedge derivatives. Derivatives
designated as either a fair value or cash flow hedge that
are expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting
changes in fair value or cash flows are assessed on an
ongoing basis to determine that they actually have been
highly effective throughout the financial reporting
periods for which they were designated. Derivative assets
and derivative liabilities are shown separately in the
balance sheet unless there is a legal right to offset and
intent to settle on a net basis.
Fair Value Hedges
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are
designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded
in the consolidated statement of income, together
with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset
or liability or firm commitment that is attributable to
the hedged risk.
Cash Flow Hedges
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of
derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash
flow hedges is recognized in equity. The gain or loss
relating to the ineffective portion is recognized in
the consolidated statements of income. Amounts
accumulated in equity are transferred to the consolidated
statements of income in the period when the forecasted
transaction impacts earnings. When the forecasted
transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of
a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, the gains
and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred
from equity and included in the measurement of the
initial carrying amount of the asset or liability.
When a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge
expires or is sold and the forecasted transaction is still
expected to occur, any cumulative gain or loss relating to
the derivative that is recorded in equity at that time
remains in equity and is recognized in the consolidated
statements of income when the forecasted transaction
occurs. When a forecasted transaction is no longer
expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was
recorded in equity is immediately transferred to the
consolidated statements of income.
Non-Hedge Derivatives
Derivative instruments that do not qualify as either fair
value or cash flow hedges are recorded at their fair value
at the balance sheet date, with changes in fair value
recognized in the consolidated statements of income.
s) Embedded Derivatives
Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or
executory contracts are accounted for as separate
derivatives when their risks and characteristics are not
closely related to their host financial instrument or
contract. In some cases, the embedded derivatives may
be designated as hedges and are accounted for as
described above.
t) Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. The fair value hierarchy establishes
three levels to classify the inputs to valuation techniques
used to measure fair value. Refer to note 25 for
further information.
u) Environmental Rehabilitation Provision
Mining, extraction and processing activities normally
give rise to obligations for environmental rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation work can include facility decommissioning
and dismantling; removal or treatment of waste
materials; site and land rehabilitation, including
compliance with and monitoring of environmental
regulations; security and other site-related costs required
to perform the rehabilitation work; and operation
of equipment designed to reduce or eliminate
environmental effects. The extent of work required and
the associated costs are dependent on the requirements
of relevant authorities and our environmental policies.
Routine operating costs that may impact the ultimate
closure and rehabilitation activities, such as waste
material handling conducted as an integral part of a
mining or production process, are not included in the
provision. Costs arising from unforeseen circumstances,
such as the contamination caused by unplanned
discharges, are recognized as an expense and liability
89
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 when the event that gives rise to an obligation occurs
and reliable estimates of the required rehabilitation costs
can be made.
Provisions for the cost of each rehabilitation
program are normally recognized at the time that an
environmental disturbance occurs or a constructive
obligation is determined. When the extent of disturbance
increases over the life of an operation, the provision is
increased accordingly. The major parts of the carrying
amount of provisions relate to tailings pond closure/
rehabilitation; demolition of buildings/mine facilities;
ongoing water treatment; and ongoing care and
maintenance and security of closed mines. Costs
included in the provision encompass all closure and
rehabilitation activity expected to occur progressively
over the life of the operation at the time of closure and
post-closure in connection with disturbances as at the
reporting date. Estimated costs included in the
determination of the provision reflect the risks and
probabilities of alternative estimates of cash flows
required to settle the obligation at each particular
operation. The expected rehabilitation costs are
estimated based on the cost of external contractors
performing the work or the cost of performing the work
internally depending on management’s intention.
The timing of the actual rehabilitation expenditure
is dependent upon a number of factors such as the life
and nature of the asset, the operating license conditions
and the environment in which the mine operates.
Expenditures may occur before and after closure and
can continue for an extended period of time depending
on rehabilitation requirements. Rehabilitation provisions
are measured at the expected value of future cash flows,
which exclude the effect of inflation, discounted to
their present value using a current US dollar real risk-free
pre-tax discount rate. The unwinding of the discount,
referred to as accretion expense, is included in finance
costs and results in an increase in the amount of the
provision. Provisions are updated each reporting period
for changes to expected cash flows and for the effect of
changes in the discount rate, and the change in estimate
is added or deducted from the related asset and
depreciated over the expected economic life of the
operation to which it relates.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved
in forming expectations of future activities and the
amount and timing of the associated cash flows.
Those expectations are formed based on existing
environmental and regulatory requirements or, if more
stringent, our environmental policies which give rise
to a constructive obligation.
90
When provisions for closure and rehabilitation are
initially recognized, the corresponding cost is capitalized
as an asset, representing part of the cost of acquiring
the future economic benefits of the operation. The
capitalized cost of closure and rehabilitation activities is
recognized in PP&E and depreciated over the expected
economic life of the operation to which it relates.
Adjustments to the estimated amount and timing of
future closure and rehabilitation cash flows are a normal
occurrence in light of the significant judgments and
estimates involved. The principal factors that can cause
expected cash flows to change are: the construction of
new processing facilities; changes in the quantities of
material in reserves and resources with a corresponding
change in the life of mine plan; changing ore
characteristics that impact required environmental
protection measures and related costs; changes in water
quality that impact the extent of water treatment
required; changes in discount rates; changes in foreign
exchange rates and changes in laws and regulations
governing the protection of the environment.
Rehabilitation provisions are adjusted as a result
of changes in estimates and assumptions. Those
adjustments are accounted for as a change in the
corresponding cost of the related assets, including the
related mineral property, except where a reduction
in the provision is greater than the remaining net book
value of the related assets, in which case the value is
reduced to nil and the remaining adjustment is
recognized in the consolidated statement of income.
In the case of closed sites, changes in estimates and
assumptions are recognized immediately in the
consolidated statement of income. For an operating
mine, the adjusted carrying amount of the related asset
is depreciated prospectively. Adjustments also result
in changes to future finance costs.
v) Litigation and Other Provisions
Provisions are recognized when a present obligation
exists (legal or constructive), as a result of a past event,
for which it is probable that an outflow of resources will
be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable
estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Provisions are discounted to their present value using a
current US dollar real risk-free pre-tax discount rate and
the accretion expense is included in finance costs.
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the
financial statements are issued, which may result in a
loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved
when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 In assessing loss contingencies related to legal
proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted
claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company
with assistance from its legal counsel evaluate the
perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted
claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of
relief sought or expected to be sought.
If the assessment of a contingency suggests that
a loss is probable, and the amount can be reliably
estimated, then a loss is recorded. When a contingent
loss is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is
probable but the amount of loss cannot be reliably
estimated, then details of the contingent loss are
disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are
generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees,
in which case we disclose the nature of the guarantee.
Legal fees incurred in connection with pending legal
proceedings are expensed as incurred. Contingent gains
are only recognized when the inflow of economic
benefits is virtually certain.
w) Stock-Based Compensation
Barrick offers equity-settled (Employee Stock Option Plan
(“ESOP”), Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)) and
cash-settled (Restricted Share Units (“RSU”), Deferred
Share Units (“DSU”), Performance Restricted Share Units
(“PRSU”)) awards to certain employees, officers and
directors of the Company.
Equity-settled awards are measured at fair value
using the Lattice model with market related inputs as
of the date of the grant. The cost is recorded over the
vesting period of the award to the same expense
category as the award recipient’s payroll costs (i.e. cost
of sales, operating segment administration, corporate
administration) and the corresponding entry is recorded
in equity. Equity-settled awards are not remeasured
subsequent to the initial grant date.
Cash-settled awards are measured at fair value
initially using the market value of the underlying shares
at the date of the grant of the award and are required to
be remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until
settlement. The cost is then recorded over the vesting
period of the award. This expense, and any changes in
the fair value of the award, is recorded to the same
expense category as the award recipient’s payroll costs.
The cost of a cash-settled award is recorded within
liabilities until settled.
We use the accelerated method (also referred to
as ‘graded’ vesting) for attributing stock option expense
over the vesting period. Stock option expense
incorporates an expected forfeiture rate. The expected
forfeiture rate is estimated based on historical forfeiture
rates and expectations of future forfeiture rates. We
make adjustments if the actual forfeiture rate differs
from the expected rate.
Employee Stock Option Plan (“ESOP”)
Under Barrick’s ESOP, certain officers and key employees
of the Corporation may purchase common shares at an
exercise price that is equal to the closing share price on
the day before the grant of the option. The grant date is
the date when the details of the award, including the
number of options granted to the individual and the
exercise price, are approved. Stock options vest equally
over four years, beginning in the year after granting.
The ESOP arrangement has graded vesting terms, and
therefore, multiple vesting periods must be valued and
accounted for separately over their respective vesting
periods. The compensation expense of the instruments
issued for each grant under the ESOP is calculated using
the Lattice model. The compensation expense is adjusted
by the estimated forfeiture rate which is estimated based
on historical forfeiture rates and expectations of future
forfeiture rates. We make adjustments if the actual
forfeiture rate differs from the expected rate.
Restricted Share Units (“RSU”)
Under our RSU plan, selected employees are granted
RSUs where each RSU has a value equal to one Barrick
common share. RSUs vest at the end of two and a half
years and are settled in cash upon vesting. Additional
RSUs are credited to reflect dividends paid on Barrick
common shares over the vesting period.
A liability for RSUs is measured at fair value on the
grant date and is subsequently adjusted for changes in
fair value. The liability is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period, with a corresponding
charge to compensation expense, as a component of
corporate administration and operating segment
administration. Compensation expenses for RSUs
incorporate an estimate for expected forfeiture rates
based on which the fair value is adjusted.
91
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Deferred Share Units (“DSU”)
Under our DSU plan, Directors must receive a specified
portion of their basic annual retainer in the form of
DSUs, with the option to elect to receive 100% of such
retainer in DSUs. Each DSU has the same value as one
Barrick common share. DSUs must be retained until the
Director leaves the Board, at which time the cash value
of the DSUs is paid out. Additional DSUs are credited to
reflect dividends paid on Barrick common shares. The
initial fair value of the liability is calculated as of the
grant date and is recognized immediately. Subsequently,
at each reporting date and on settlement, the liability is
remeasured, with any change in fair value recorded as
compensation expense in the period.
Performance Restricted Share Units
Under our PRSU plan, selected employees are granted
PRSUs, where each PRSU has a value equal to one Barrick
common share. PRSUs vest at the end of a three-year
period and are settled in cash on the third anniversary of
the grant date. Additional PRSUs are credited to reflect
dividends paid on Barrick common shares over the
vesting period. Vesting, and therefore the liability, is
based on the achievement of performance goals and the
target settlement ranges from 0% to 200% of the
original grant of units.
The value of a PRSU reflects the value of a Barrick
common share and the number of shares issued is
adjusted for its relative performance against certain
competitors. Therefore, the fair value of the PRSUs is
determined with reference to the closing stock price
at each remeasurement date.
The initial fair value of the liability is calculated as of
the grant date and is recognized within compensation
expense using the straight-line method over the vesting
period. Subsequently, at each reporting date and on
settlement, the liability is remeasured, with any changes
in fair value recorded as compensation expense. The fair
value is adjusted for the revised estimated forfeiture rate.
Employee Share Purchase Plan
Under our ESPP plan, Barrick employees can purchase
Company shares through payroll deduction. Each year,
employees may contribute 1%–6% of their combined
base salary and annual bonus, and Barrick will match
50% of the contribution, up to a maximum of $5,000
per year.
Both Barrick and the employee make the
contributions on a bi-monthly basis with the funds
being transferred to a custodian who purchases
Barrick Common Shares in the open market. Shares
purchased with employee contributions have no vesting
requirement; however, shares purchased with Barrick’s
contributions vest one year from contribution date.
All dividend income is used to purchase additional
Barrick shares.
Barrick records an expense equal to its bi-monthly
cash contribution. No forfeiture rate is applied to the
amounts accrued. Where an employee leaves prior to
vesting, any accrual for contributions by Barrick during
the year related to that employee is reversed.
x) Post-Retirement Benefits
Defined Contribution Pension Plans
Certain employees take part in defined contribution
employee benefit plans whereby we contribute up to
6% of the employees’ annual salary. We also have a
retirement plan for certain officers of Barrick under
which we contribute 15% of the officer’s annual salary.
The contributions are recognized as compensation
expense as incurred. The Company has no further
payment obligations once the contributions have
been paid.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
We have qualified defined benefit pension plans that
cover certain United States and Canadian employees and
provide benefits based on employees’ years of service.
Our policy is to fund the amounts necessary on an
actuarial basis to provide enough assets to meet the
benefits payable to plan members. Independent trustees
administer assets of the plans, which are invested mainly
in fixed income and equity securities.
As well as the qualified plans, we have non-qualified
defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees
and former directors of Barrick. No funding is done on
these plans and contributions for future years are
required to be equal to benefit payments.
Actuarial gains and losses arise when the actual
return on plan assets differs from the expected return on
plan assets for a period, or when the accrued benefit
obligations change during the year. We record actuarial
gains and losses in OCI and retained earnings.
92
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Our valuations are carried out using the projected
unit credit method. We record the difference between
the fair value of the plan assets and the present value of
the plan obligations as an asset or liability on the
consolidated balance sheets.
Pension Plan Assets and Liabilities
Pension plan assets, which consist primarily of fixed-
income and equity securities, are valued using current
market quotations. Plan obligations and the annual
pension expense are determined on an actuarial basis
and are affected by numerous assumptions and
estimates including the market value of plan assets,
estimates of the expected return on plan assets, discount
rates, future wage increases and other assumptions.
The discount rate is the assumption that generally
has the most significant impact on our pension cost
and obligation.
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
We provide post-retirement medical, dental, and life
insurance benefits to certain employees. Actuarial gains
and losses resulting from variances between actual
results and economic estimates or actuarial assumptions
are recorded in OCI.
y) New Accounting Standards Adopted During the Year
The Company has adopted the following new standards,
along with any consequential amendments, effective
January 1, 2013. These changes were made in accordance
with the applicable transitional provisions.
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 10 Consolidated
Financial Statements to replace the consolidation
guidance in IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements and SIC 12 Consolidation – Special Purpose
Entities. The new consolidation standard changes the
definition of control so that the same criteria apply to all
entities, both operating and special purpose entities, to
determine control. The revised definition of control
focuses on the need to have power over the investee,
exposure to variable returns from its involvement with
the investee and the ability to use its power over the
investee to affect its returns. We conducted a review of
all our non-wholly owned entities and structured entities
and determined that the adoption of IFRS 10 did not
result in any change in the consolidation status of any of
our subsidiaries and investees.
IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
to replace IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures. The new
standard defines two types of arrangements: Joint
Operations and Joint Ventures. The focus of the standard
is to reflect the rights and obligations of the parties
involved in the joint arrangement, regardless of whether
the joint arrangement operates through a separate legal
entity. Joint arrangements that are classified as joint
ventures are accounted for using the equity method of
accounting. Joint arrangements that are classified as
joint operations require the venturers to recognize the
individual assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses to
which they have legal rights or are responsible. As a
result of adopting IFRS 11, we have classified our interest
in the Donlin Gold project as a joint operation. Our 50%
interest in the project was previously accounted for using
the equity method of accounting.
As a result of the change in accounting, we now
recognize our share of the project’s assets, liabilities,
revenue and expenses. This change in accounting was
adopted as at January 1, 2013 with retrospective
application by the derecognition of our equity investment
and the recognition of our share of the project’s assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses.
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 12 Disclosure of
Interests in Other Entities to create a comprehensive
disclosure standard to address the requirements for
subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates including
the reporting entity’s involvement with other entities.
It also includes the requirements for unconsolidated
structured entities (i.e. special purpose entities). We have
adopted IFRS 12 effective January 1, 2013. We have
added additional disclosures in notes 2b, 15, 31.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13 Fair Value
Measurement as a single source of guidance for all fair
value measurements required by IFRS to reduce the
complexity and improve consistency across its application.
The standard provides a definition of fair value and
guidance on how to measure fair value as well as a
requirement for enhanced disclosures. We have adopted
IFRS 13 on a prospective basis. We have added additional
disclosures on fair value measurement in note 25.
93
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 IAS 19 Employee Benefits
In June 2011, the IASB issued revised IAS 19. As a result
we replaced interest cost and expected return on plan
assets with a net interest amount that is calculated by
applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit
liability (asset). Adoption of revised IAS 19 did not
materially impact the measurement, recognition or
disclosure in our financial statements. See note 34 for
further details.
IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase
of a Surface Mine
In October 2011, the IASB issued IFRIC 20 Stripping
Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine. IFRIC 20
provides guidance on the accounting for the costs
of stripping activities during the production phase of
surface mining when two benefits accrue to the entity
as a result of the stripping: useable ore that can be used
to produce inventory and improved access to further
Adjustments to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
quantities of material that will be mined in future
periods. We have adopted IFRIC 20 effective January 1,
2013. Upon adoption of IFRIC 20, we assessed the
stripping asset on the balance sheet as at January 1,
2012 and determined that there are identifiable
components of the ore body with which this stripping
asset can be associated, and therefore no balance sheet
adjustment was required. The adoption of IFRIC 20 has
resulted in increased capitalization of waste stripping
costs and a reduction in our cost of sales in 2012. If
we had not adopted the standard, our net income and
capitalized waste stripping costs for current and
comparative periods would have decreased.
For the quantitative impact of adopting IFRS 11
and IFRIC 20 on our prior year consolidated financial
statements and of the impact of the discontinued
operations of our energy business (note 4b), please
refer to the tables below.
As at January 1, 2012
Adjustments for changes in accounting policy
As at January 1, 2012
Cash and equivalents
Equity in investees
Property, plant and equipment
Accounts payable
Increase in net assets
(previously stated)
IFRS 11
IFRIC 20
$ 2,745
440
28,979
(2,083)
$ 4
(99)
97
(2)
$ –
$ –
–
–
–
$ –
(restated)
$ 2,749
341
29,076
(2,085)
As at December 31, 2012
Adjustments for changes in accounting policy
As at December 31, 2012
(previously stated)
IFRS 11
IFRIC 20
(restated)
Cash and equivalents
Inventories
Equity in investees
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred income tax assets
Accounts payable
Deferred income tax liabilities
Increase in net assets
$ 2,093
4,387
135
28,717
443
(2,265)
(2,602)
$ 4
–
(115)
113
–
(2)
–
$ –
$
–
(247)
–
447
(6)
–
(66)
$ 128
$ 2,097
4,140
20
29,277
437
(2,267)
(2,668)
94
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Adjustments to the Consolidated Statements of Income:
For the year ended December 31
2012
Adjustments for changes in accounting policy
operations1
2012
Discontinued
(previously stated)
IFRS 11
IFRIC 20
(restated)
Revenue
Cost of sales
Impairment charges
Other expense (income)
Loss from equity investees
Finance costs
Income tax recovery (expense)
$ 14,547
7,654
6,470
326
(13)
(177)
236
Increase in net income from continuing operations
Adjustments to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow:
$ –
–
–
1
1
–
–
$ –
$
–
(232)
32
–
–
–
(72)
$ 128
$ 14,394
7,257
6,294
303
(12)
(174)
102
$ (153)
(165)
(208)
(24)
–
3
(62)
$ 185
For the year ended December 31
2012
Adjustments for changes in accounting policy
operations1
2012
Discontinued
(previously stated)
IFRS 11
IFRIC 20
(restated)
Net loss
Adjusted for the following items:
Depreciation
Finance costs (excludes accretion)
Impairment charges
Income tax expense (recovery)
Increase in inventory
Other operating activities
Net cash (provided by) used in operating activities
from continuing operations
Capital expenditures
Other investing activities
Net cash (provided by) used in investing activities
from continuing operations
Debt
Repayments
Net cash used in financing activities from
continuing operations
Net decrease in cash and equivalents
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and equivalents at end of year
1. Refer to note 4b
$
(677)
1,722
123
6,470
(236)
(616)
(144)
(6,369)
(328)
(1,462)
(652)
2,745
$ 2,093
$ –
–
–
–
–
–
(2)
(2)
(15)
17
2
–
–
–
4
$ 4
$ 128
31
–
32
72
256
–
519
(519)
–
$ 185
$ (364)
(102)
(2)
(208)
62
–
(137)
(202)
130
–
1,651
121
6,294
(102)
(360)
(283)
(6,773)
(311)
(519)
130
–
–
–
–
69
(1,393)
69
–
–
(652)
2,749
$
–
$
–
$ 2,097
95
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
z) New Accounting Standards Issued But Not
Yet Effective
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
In November 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9 Financial
Instruments as the first step in its project to replace IAS 39
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
IFRS 9 retains but simplifies the mixed measurement
model and establishes two primary measurement
categories for financial assets: amortized cost and fair
value. The basis of classification depends on an entity’s
business model and the contractual cash flows of the
financial asset. Classification is made at the time the
financial asset is initially recognized, namely when the
entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of
the instrument. Requirements for classification and
measurement of financial liabilities were added in
October 2010 and they largely carried forward existing
requirements in IAS 39, except that fair value changes
due to an entity’s own credit risk for liabilities designated
at fair value through profit and loss would generally be
recorded in OCI rather than the income statement.
IFRS 9 amends some of the requirements of IFRS 7
Financial Instruments: Disclosures, including added
disclosures about investments in equity instruments
measured at fair value in OCI, and guidance on financial
liabilities and derecognition of financial instruments.
In December 2011, amendments to IFRS 7 were issued
to require additional disclosures on transition from IAS
39 to IFRS 9. In November 2013, IFRS 9 was amended to
include guidance on hedge accounting and to allow
entities to early adopt the requirement to recognize
changes in fair value attributable to changes in an entity’s
own credit risk, from financial liabilities designated under
the fair value option, in OCI (without having to adopt the
remainder of IFRS 9). In July 2013, the IASB tentatively
decided to defer the mandatory effective date of IFRS 9.
The IASB agreed that the mandatory effective date
should no longer be annual periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2015 but rather be left open pending
the finalization of the impairment and classification and
measurement requirements. We are currently assessing
the impact of adopting IFRS 9 on our consolidated
financial statements.
IFRIC 21 Levies
In May 2013, IASB issued IFRIC 21 Levies, which sets out
the accounting for an obligation to pay a levy that is not
income tax. The interpretation addresses what the
obligating event is that gives rise to pay a levy and when
should a liability be recognized. We are currently
assessing the impact of adopting IFRIC 21 on our
consolidated financial statements.
3 Significant Judgments, Estimates, and Assumptions
Many of the amounts included in the consolidated
balance sheet require management to make judgments
and/or estimates. These judgments and estimates are
continuously evaluated and are based on management’s
experience and knowledge of the relevant facts and
circumstances. Actual results may differ from the
estimates. Information about such judgments and
estimates is contained in the description of our
accounting policies and/or other notes to the financial
statements. The key areas where judgments,
estimates and assumptions have been made are
summarized below.
Reserves and Resources
Estimates of the quantities of proven and probable
mineral reserves and mineral resources, form the basis
for our life of mine (“LOM”) plans, which are used for a
number of important business and accounting purposes,
including: the calculation of depreciation expense; the
capitalization of production phase stripping costs; and
forecasting the timing of the payments related to the
environmental rehabilitation provision. In addition, the
underlying LOM plans are used in the impairment tests
for goodwill and non-current assets. We estimate our ore
reserves and mineral resources based on information
compiled by qualified persons as defined in accordance
with the Canadian Securities Administrators’ National
Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects requirements. Refer to notes 18 and 20.
Impairment of Goodwill and Non-Current Assets
Goodwill and non-current assets are tested for
impairment if there is an indicator of impairment, and
in the case of goodwill, annually at the beginning of
the fourth quarter for all of our operating segments.
Calculating the estimated fair values of CGUs for
96
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 non-current asset impairment tests and CGUs or groups
of CGUs for goodwill impairment tests requires
management to make estimates and assumptions with
respect to future production levels, operating and capital
costs in our LOM plans, future metal prices, foreign
exchange rates, Net Asset Value (“NAV”) multiples, value
of reserves outside LOM plans in relation to the
assumptions related to comparable entities and the
market values per ounce and per pound and discount
rates. Changes in any of the assumptions or estimates
used in determining the fair values could impact the
impairment analysis. Management is also required to
make a judgment with respect to which CGUs should
be grouped together for goodwill testing purposes,
including the assessment of operating segments, the
highest level at which goodwill can be tested. Refer to
note 2n, note 2p and note 20 for further information.
Capitalization of Exploration and Evaluation Costs
Management has determined that costs related to
exploration drilling, evaluation studies and other
development work that have been capitalized have
probable future benefit and are economically
recoverable. Management’s criteria for assessing the
economic recoverability of these costs is disclosed in
note 2g.
Production Stage of a Mine
The determination of the date on which a mine enters
the production stage is a significant judgment since
capitalization of certain costs ceases upon entering
production. As a mine is constructed, costs incurred are
capitalized and proceeds from mineral sales are offset
against the capitalized costs. This continues until the
mine is available for use in the manner intended by
management, which requires significant judgment in its
determination. Refer to note 2l for further information
on the criteria used to make this assessment.
Provisions for Environmental Rehabilitation
Management assesses its provision for environmental
rehabilitation on an annual basis or when new
information becomes available. This assessment includes
the estimation of the future rehabilitation costs,
the timing of these expenditures, and the impact of
changes in discount rates and foreign exchange rates.
The actual future expenditures may differ from the
amounts currently provided if the estimates made are
significantly different than actual results or if there are
significant changes in environmental and/or regulatory
requirements in the future. Refer to notes 2u and 26
for further information.
Taxes
Management is required to make estimations regarding
the tax basis of assets and liabilities and related deferred
income tax assets and liabilities, amounts recorded for
uncertain tax positions, the measurement of income tax
expense and indirect taxes, and estimates of the timing
of repatriation of earnings, which would impact the
recognition of withholding taxes and taxes related to the
outside basis on subsidiaries/associates. A number of
these estimates require management to make estimates
of future taxable profit, and the recoverability of indirect
taxes, and if actual results are significantly different than
our estimates, the ability to realize the deferred tax assets
and indirect tax receivables recorded on our balance
sheet could be impacted. Refer to note 2i, note 11 and
note 29 for further information.
Contingencies
Contingencies can be either possible assets or possible
liabilities arising from past events which, by their nature,
will only be resolved when one or more future events
not wholly within our control occur or fail to occur. The
assessment of such contingencies inherently involves the
exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the
outcome of future events. In assessing loss contingencies
related to legal proceedings that are pending against us
or unasserted claims, that may result in such proceedings
or regulatory or government actions that may negatively
impact our business or operations, the Company with
assistance from its legal counsel evaluate the perceived
merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims
or actions as well as the perceived merits of the nature
and amount of relief sought or expected to be sought,
when determining the amount, if any, to recognize
as a contingent liability or assessing the impact on the
carrying value of assets. Contingent assets are not
recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
Refer to note 35 for more information.
Pascua-Lama Suspension Costs
As a result of our decision to suspend the construction
of our Pascua-Lama project, significant judgment and
estimation has been used in determining our accrued
liabilities, including: demobilization, contract claims,
severance and VAT refunds previously received in Chile.
97
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 For contractors, it is necessary to estimate accruals for
work completed but not yet invoiced based on subjective
assessments of the stage of completion of their work in
relation to invoices rendered; and for costs arising from
existing contracts for legal or constructive obligations
arising from our demobilization actions. For employees
it is necessary to estimate accruals for termination
obligations that have been incurred in accordance with
our detailed, formal demobilization plan. In addition, we
have received VAT refunds in Chile related to Pascua-
Lama of $429 million that will require repayment should
the project not come into production, which has not
been accrued as the suspension is considered temporary.
Joint Arrangements
Judgment is required to determine when we have joint
control, which requires an assessment of the relevant
activities and when the decisions in relation to those
activities require unanimous consent. We have
determined that the relevant activities for our joint
arrangements are those relating to the operating and
capital decisions of the arrangement, such as: the
approval of the LOM plan, and appointing, remunerating
and terminating the key management personnel of the
joint arrangement.
Judgment is also required to classify a joint
arrangement. Classifying the arrangement requires us
to assess our rights and obligations arising from the
arrangement. Specifically, it considers:
The structure of the joint arrangement – whether it is
structured through a separate vehicle
When the arrangement is structured through a
separate vehicle, we also consider the rights and
obligations arising from:
The legal form of the separate vehicle
The terms of the contractual arrangement
Other facts and circumstances (when relevant)
This assessment often requires significant judgment, and
a different conclusion on joint control and also whether
the arrangement is a JO or a JV, may materially impact
the accounting. Donlin Gold is a joint arrangement
which is structured through a separate vehicle, being an
LLC, however the terms of the contractual arrangement
indicate that we have rights to our share of the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of the mine and
therefore concluded that it was a joint operation and
as such, we recorded our share of assets and liabilities
of Donlin Gold.
Refer to note 27 for a summary of our key
financial risks.
98
Other Notes to the Financial Statements
Note
Page
Divestitures
Segment information
Revenue
Cost of sales
Exploration and evaluation
Other expenses
General and administrative expenses
Income tax expense (recovery)
Earnings (loss) per share
Finance costs
Cash flow – other items
Investments
Inventories
Accounts receivable and other current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill and other intangible assets
Impairment of goodwill and non-current assets
Other assets
Accounts payable
Other current liabilities
Financial instruments
Fair value measurements
Provisions
Financial risk management
Other non-current liabilities
Deferred income taxes
Capital stock
Non-controlling interests
Remuneration of key management personnel
Stock-based compensation
Post-retirement benefits
Contingencies
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
98
99
102
102
104
104
104
104
106
106
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
117
117
117
117
127
130
130
134
135
137
138
139
139
141
145
4 Divestitures
a) Disposition of Yilgarn South assets
On September 30, 2013, we recorded the sale of Yilgarn
South assets, which are comprised of Granny Smith,
Lawlers and Darlot mines from our Australia Pacific
operating unit for total proceeds of $266 million,
consisting of $135 million in cash and $131 million in
Gold Fields Limited shares (“GFL”). We measured GFL
shares using the quoted market price at September 30,
2013 and there are no restrictions on when we can divest
these shares. As a result of this sale, we recognized a gain
of $11 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
b) Disposition of Barrick Energy
On July 31, 2013, we closed the sale of Barrick Energy
for total proceeds of $435 million, consisting of
$387 million in cash and a future royalty valued at
$48 million. As a result of the sale, we recognized a
loss of $519 million for the year ended December 31,
2013 representing the difference between the net
proceeds and our carrying value.
The condensed statements of income for Barrick
Energy for the years ended December 31, 2013 and
2012, which has been disclosed as a discontinued
operation in the consolidated statements of income,
are as follows:
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
Revenue
Cost of sales1
Loss on remeasurement/impairment
Other expense
Loss before finance items and income taxes
Finance items
Loss before income taxes
Income tax recovery
$ 93
79
519
13
(518)
(1)
(519)
13
$ 153
165
208
24
(244)
(3)
(247)
62
Net loss
$ (506)
$ (185)
1. Includes depreciation of $43 million for the year ended December 31,
2013 (2012: $102 million).
5 Segment Information
In the fourth quarter 2013, we reorganized our
operating structure and as a result, we are now
organized into ten Operating Units: five individual gold
mines, two gold mine portfolios, one publicly traded
gold company, a global copper business, and one
project. Barrick’s CODM reviews the operating results,
assesses performance and makes capital allocation
decisions for each of these business operations at an
Operating Unit level. Therefore, these Operating Units
are operating segments for financial reporting purposes.
We have restated our prior period results to conform
c) Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale
On January 31, 2014, we completed the sale of our
Plutonic mine, part of our Australia Pacific operating
unit, for total cash consideration of A$25 million. As at
December 31, 2013, the assets and liabilities of Plutonic
were written down to their realizable value, resulting in
a loss of $17 million and have been presented as held
for sale on the consolidated balance sheet.
On January 22, 2014, we announced we had
agreed to divest our Kanowna mine, part of our Australia
Pacific operating unit, for total cash consideration of
A$75 million, subject to certain closing adjustments. The
transaction is expected to close in March 2014. Based
on the expected proceeds of this transaction, we have
reversed $66 million of impairment losses that we had
recorded against Kanowna in second quarter 2013.
As at December 31, 2013, the assets and liabilities of
Kanowna have been presented as held for sale on
the consolidated balance sheet.
On February 4, 2014, we announced we had agreed
to divest our minority interest in the Marigold mine, part
of our North America – Other operating unit for total cash
consideration of $86 million, subject to certain closing
adjustments. The transaction is expected to close in April
2014. As at December 31, 2013, the assets and liabilities
of Marigold were written down to their realizable value,
resulting in a loss of $60 million and have been presented
as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet.
to the current presentation. See note 19 for details
regarding goodwill reallocation.
Segment performance is evaluated based on a
number of measures including operating income before
tax, production levels and unit production costs. Income
tax, operating segment administration, finance income
and costs, impairment charges and reversals, investment
write-downs and gains/losses on non-hedge derivatives
are managed on a consolidated basis and are therefore
not reflected in segment income.
99
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Consolidated Statements of Income Information
Cost of sales
Direct mining
For the year ended December 31, 2013
Revenue
& royalties Depreciation
Exploration &
evaluation
Other
expenses
(income)1
Segment
income
(loss)
Gold
Goldstrike
Cortez
Pueblo Viejo
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
North America – Other
Australia Pacific
ABG
Copper2
Pascua-Lama
$ 1,252
1,938
979
839
941
1,205
2,621
937
1,653
–
$ 544
309
420
216
398
693
1,351
580
903
–
$ 112
321
139
54
168
202
324
160
188
3
$ 12,365
$ 5,414
$ 1,671
$ –
3
–
3
6
7
26
17
–
–
$ 62
$ 10
11
(4)
18
63
22
16
60
77
546
$ 586
1,294
424
548
306
281
904
120
485
(549)
$ 819
$ 4,399
Consolidated Statements of Income Information
Cost of sales
Direct mining
For the year ended December 31, 2012 (restated)
Revenue
& royalties Depreciation
Exploration &
evaluation
Other
expenses
(income)1
Segment
income
(loss)
Gold
Goldstrike
Cortez
Pueblo Viejo
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
North America – Other
Australia Pacific
ABG
Copper2
Pascua-Lama
$ 1,969
2,238
–
1,245
1,230
1,515
3,233
1,081
1,690
–
$ 617
314
–
238
392
686
1,627
632
974
–
$ 113
289
–
58
194
176
319
162
253
3
$ 13
25
–
5
7
9
54
29
14
–
$
(7)
7
–
15
32
13
47
37
57
79
$ 1,233
1,603
–
929
605
631
1,186
221
392
(82)
$ 14,201
$ 5,480
$ 1,567
$ 156
$ 280
$ 6,718
1. Other expenses include accretion expense, which is included with finance costs in the consolidated statements of income. For the year ended December 31, 2013,
accretion expense was $51 million (2012: $37 million). Refer to note 9a for detail of other expenses. Pascua-Lama other expenses include $235 million in severance
and demobilization costs and $65 million in project care and maintenance costs.
2. The Copper segment includes exploration and evaluation expense and losses from equity investees that hold copper projects.
Reconciliation of Segment Income to Loss from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
For the years ended December 31
Segment income
Other revenue1
Other cost of sales/amortization1
Exploration not attributable to segments
Evaluation not attributable to segments
General and administrative expenses
Other expense not attributable to segments
Impairment charges not attributable to segment
Finance income
Finance costs (includes non-segment accretion)
Unrealized gain on non-hedge derivatives
Loss before income taxes
2013
(restated)
2012
$ 4,399
146
(158)
(129)
(17)
(390)
(110)
(12,687)
9
(606)
76
$ 6,718
193
(210)
(212)
(3)
(503)
(60)
(6,294)
11
(137)
31
$ (9,467)
$
(466)
1. Other revenue and cost of sales represents revenue from Pierina, which is not part of any of our operating segments. Pierina entered closure in 2013.
100
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Geographic Information
Non-current assets
Revenue2
United States
Zambia
Chile
Dominican Republic
Argentina
Tanzania
Canada
Saudi Arabia
Australia
Papua New Guinea
Peru
Other
Unallocated1
Total
As at Dec. 31, As at Dec. 31,
2012 (restated)
2013
As at Jan. 1,
2012 (restated)
2013
2012
$ 7,014
1,036
3,998
4,836
2,425
1,549
448
741
997
672
734
–
6,786
$ 6,658
973
6,072
4,799
4,427
2,325
1,294
1,550
1,632
1,218
785
–
9,988
$ 5,774
5,153
5,111
3,638
2,893
2,099
1,405
1,611
1,485
1,017
602
121
11,428
$ 4,117
666
987
979
941
937
278
–
1,962
659
985
–
–
$ 5,373
566
1,124
–
1,230
1,081
349
–
2,520
713
1,438
–
–
$ 31,236
$ 41,721
$ 42,337
$ 12,511
$ 14,394
1. Unallocated assets include goodwill, deferred tax assets and certain financial assets. Goodwill is not allocated on a country basis as it is allocated on an operating
segment basis, which could be across multiple countries.
2. Presented based on the location from which the product originated.
Asset Information1
Total assets
Segment capital expenditures2
Gold
Goldstrike
Cortez
Pueblo Viejo
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
North America – Other
Australia Pacific
ABG
Copper
Pascua-Lama
Segment total
Cash and equivalents
Other current assets
Equity in investees
Other investments
Intangible assets
Deferred income tax assets
Assets of held for sale
Goodwill
Other items not allocated to segments3
As at Dec. 31, As at Dec. 31,
2012 (restated)
2013
As at Jan. 1,
2012 (restated)
$ 2,222
3,042
4,836
614
634
1,525
1,669
1,515
3,018
2,593
$ 21,668
2,404
3,485
–
120
320
501
323
5,835
2,792
$ 1,876
2,938
4,799
534
1,058
1,696
2,869
2,295
3,799
6,270
$ 28,134
2,097
3,660
–
78
453
437
–
8,837
3,782
$ 1,475
2,693
3,638
405
1,041
1,449
2,521
2,079
8,149
3,913
$ 27,363
2,749
3,800
209
161
569
409
–
9,626
4,000
For the year
For the year
ended Dec. 31, ended Dec. 31,
2012 (restated)
2013
$ 474
396
169
145
208
341
438
387
405
2,226
$ 5,189
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
120
$ 453
502
1,067
162
196
355
568
327
859
2,113
$ 6,602
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
265
Total
$ 37,448
$ 47,478
$ 48,886
$ 5,309
$ 6,867
1. Liabilities are not provided to the CODM on a segment basis and have therefore been excluded from segment disclosures.
2. Segment capital expenditures are presented for internal management reporting purposes on an accrual basis. Capital expenditures in the Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flow are presented on a cash basis. In 2013, cash expenditures were $5,501 million (2012: $6,773 million) and the decrease in accrued expenditures was
$192 million (2012: $94 million increase).
3. Primarily relates to long lived assets at Cerro Casale, Pierina and Barrick Energy (2012 and 2011).
101
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
6 Revenue
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
Gold bullion sales1
Spot market sales
Concentrate sales
Copper sales1
Copper cathode sales
Concentrate sales
$ 10,427
243
$ 12,241
323
$ 10,670
$ 12,564
$
987
664
$ 1,123
566
$ 1,651
$ 1,689
Other metal sales2
$
190
$
141
Total
$ 12,511
$ 14,394
Provisional Copper and Gold Sales
We have provisionally priced sales for which price
finalization, referenced to the relevant copper and gold
index, is outstanding at the balance sheet date. Our
exposure at December 31, 2013 to the impact of
movements in market commodity prices for provisionally
priced sales is set out in the following table:
Impact on net
income before
taxation of 10%
movement in
market price $M
Volumes subject to
final pricing
As at December 31
2013
2012
2013
2012
1. Revenues include amounts transferred from OCI to earnings for commodity
cash flow hedges (see note 24d).
2. Revenues include the sale of by-products for our gold and copper mines.
Copper pounds (millions)
Gold ounces (000s)
63
19
64
28
$ 21
3
$ 23
5
Principal Products
All of our gold mining operations produce gold in doré
form, except Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi which produce
both gold doré and gold concentrate. Gold doré is
unrefined gold bullion bars usually consisting of 90%
gold that is refined to pure gold bullion prior to sale to
our customers. Concentrate is a processing product
containing the valuable ore mineral from which most of
the waste mineral has been eliminated. Our Lumwana
mine produces a concentrate that primarily contains
copper. At our Zaldívar mine we produce copper
cathode, which consists of 99.9% copper.
Revenue
Revenue is presented net of direct sales taxes of
$51 million (2012: $65 million). Incidental revenues
from the sale of by-products, primarily copper and
silver at our gold mines, are classified within other
metal sales.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, our provisionally
priced copper sales included provisional pricing losses of
$9 million (2012: $10 million gain) and our provisionally
priced gold sales included provisional pricing losses of
$10 million (2012: $3 million gain).
At December 31, 2013, our provisionally priced
copper and gold sales subject to final settlement were
recorded at average prices of $3.34/lb (2012: $3.59/lb)
and $1,349/oz (2012: $1,688/oz), respectively. The
sensitivities in the above tables have been determined as
the impact of a 10% change in commodity prices at
each reporting date, while holding all other variables,
including foreign currency exchange rates, constant.
7 Cost of Sales
For the years ended December 31
Direct mining cost1,2,3
Depreciation
Royalty expense
Total
2013
2012
(restated)
$ 5,190
1,732
321
$ 5,232
1,651
374
$ 7,243
$ 7,257
1. Direct mining cost includes charges to reduce the cost of inventory to net
realizable value of $46 million (2012: $74 million).
2. Direct mining cost includes the costs of extracting by-products.
3. Includes employee costs of $1,737 million (2012: $1,681 million).
102
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales consists of direct mining costs (which
include personnel costs, certain general and
administrative costs, energy costs (principally diesel
fuel and electricity), maintenance and repair costs,
operating supplies, external services, third-party smelting
and transport fees), and depreciation related to sales
and royalty expenses. Cost of sales is based on the
weighted average cost of contained or recoverable
ounces sold and royalty expense for the period. Costs
also include any impairment to reduce inventory to
its net realizable value.
Royalties
Certain of our properties are subject to royalty
arrangements based on mineral production at the
properties. The primary type of royalty is a net smelter
return (NSR) royalty. Under this type of royalty we
pay the holder an amount calculated as the royalty
percentage multiplied by the value of gold production
at market gold prices less third-party smelting, refining
and transportation costs. Other types of royalties include:
Net profits interest (NPI) royalty to other than
a government,
Modified net smelter return (NSR) royalty,
Net smelter return sliding scale (NSRSS) royalty,
Gross proceeds sliding scale (GPSS) royalty,
Gross smelter return (GSR) royalty,
Net value (NV) royalty,
Land tenement (LT) royalty, and a
Gold revenue royalty.
Royalty expense is recorded on completion of the
production or sales process.
Producing mines and
capital projects
Goldstrike
Cortez
Cortez – Pipeline/South
Pipeline deposit
Cortez – portion of Pipeline/
South Pipeline deposit
Pueblo Viejo
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
North America – Other
Williams
David Bell
Hemlo – Interlake property
Round Mountain
Bald Mountain
Ruby Hill
Australia Pacific
Porgera
Western Australia production1
Cowal
African Barrick Gold
Bulyanhulu
Tulawaka
North Mara – Nyabirama and
Nyabigena pit
North Mara – Gokona pit
Buzwagi
Copper
Lumwana
Kabanga
Pascua-Lama Project –
Chile gold production
Pascua-Lama Project –
Chile copper production
Pascua-Lama Project –
Argentina production
Other
Cerro Casale
Donlin Gold Project
Type of royalty
0%–5% NSR, 0%–6% NPI
1.5% GSR
0.4%–9% GSR
5% NV
3.2% NSR (for gold & silver)
2.51% NSR
3.75% gross proceeds
1.5% NSR, 0.75%–1% NV
3%–3.5% NSR
50% NPI, 3% NSR
3.53%–6.35% NSRSS
3.5%–7% NSRSS,
2.9%–4% NSR, 10% NPI
3% modified NSR
2% NSR, 0.25% other
2.5% of gold revenue
4% of net gold revenue
4% NSR
4% NSR
4% NSR, 1% LT
4% NSR, 1.1% LT
4% NSR, 30% NPI2
6% GSR
4% NSR
1.4%–9.6% GPSS
1.9% NSR
3% modified NSR
3% NSR (capped at $3 million
cumulative)
1.5% NSR (first 5 years),
4.5% NSR (thereafter),
8.0% NPI3
1. Includes the Kalgoorlie, Kanowna and Plutonic mines.
2. The NPI is calculated as a percentage of profits realized from the Buzwagi
mine after all capital, exploration, and development costs and interest
incurred in relation to the Buzwagi mine have been recouped and all
operating costs relating to the Buzwagi mine have been paid. No amount is
currently payable.
3. The NPI is calculated as a percentage of profits realized from the mine until
all funds invested to date with interest at an agreed upon rate are recovered.
No amount is currently payable.
103
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
8 Exploration and Evaluation
10 General and Administrative Expenses
For the years ended December 31
Exploration:
Minesite exploration
Global programs
Evaluation costs
2013
2012
(restated)
$ 51
128
$ 179
29
$ 82
211
$ 293
66
Exploration and evaluation expense1
$ 208
$ 359
In 2013, we amended the presentation of Corporate
Administration to include certain general administrative
expenditures related to management of our operating
unit offices, which were previously classified within other
expense. As a result of the amended presentation,
general and administrative expenses now include
corporate administration costs and operating segment
administration costs.
For the years ended December 31
Corporate administration
Operating segment administration
Total1
2013
$ 192
198
$ 390
2012
(restated)
$ 274
229
$ 503
2013
2012
(restated)
$ 89
$ 83
1. Includes employee costs of $241 million (2012: $295 million).
11 Income Tax Expense (Recovery)
100
7
180
235
26
65
52
3
(41)
(48)
210
39
14
73
–
2
–
–
(17)
(18)
(32)
159
For the years ended December 31
Tax on profit
Current tax
Charge for the year
Adjustment in respect of prior years
Deferred tax
Origination and reversal of temporary
differences in the current year
Adjustment in respect of prior years
2013
2012
(restated)
$ 1,106
(5)
$ 1,422
(67)
$ 1,101
$ 1,355
$ (517)
46
$ (1,545)
88
$ (471)
$ (1,457)
1. Approximates the impact on operating cash flow.
9 Other Expenses
a) Other Expense (Income)
For the years ended December 31
Corporate social responsibility
Changes in estimate of rehabilitation costs
at closed mines or mines in closure
World Gold Council fees
Currency translation losses1
Severance and demobilization costs –
Pascua-Lama
Severance – other
Project care and maintenance costs –
Pascua-Lama
Project care and maintenance costs –
Jabal Sayid
Pension and other post-retirement benefit
expense (recovery)
Gain on sale of long-lived assets/investments
Other income
Other expensed items
Total
$ 878
$ 303
1. Primarily relates to currency translation losses on working capital balances.
b) Impairment Charges
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
Impairment of long-lived assets1
Impairment of other intangibles1
Impairment of other investments1
Impairment of goodwill1
Impairment of available-for-sale investments
$ 9,734
112
–
2,815
26
$ 5,075
169
206
798
46
Total
$ 12,687
$ 6,294
1. Refer to note 20 for further details.
Income tax expense (recovery)
$ 630
$
(102)
Tax expense related to continuing operations
Current
Canada
International
Deferred
Canada
International
$
(6)
1,107
$
10
1,345
$ 1,101
$ 1,355
$
(11)
(460)
$
14
(1,471)
$ (471)
$ (1,457)
Income tax expense (recovery)
$ 630
$
(102)
104
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Currency Translation
Deferred tax balances are subject to remeasurement for
changes in currency exchange rates each period. The
most significant balances are Argentinean deferred tax
liabilities. In 2013 and 2012, tax expense of $49 and
$46 million respectively primarily arose from translation
losses due to the weakening of the Argentinean peso
against the US dollar. These losses and gains are included
within deferred tax expense/recovery.
Reconciliation to Canadian Statutory Rate
For the years ended December 31
At 26.5% statutory rate
Increase (decrease) due to:
Allowances and special tax deductions1
Impact of foreign tax rates2
Expenses not tax deductible
Goodwill impairment charges not
tax deductible
Impairment charges not recognized in
deferred tax assets
Net currency translation losses on
deferred tax balances
Current year tax losses not recognized in
deferred tax assets
Pueblo Viejo SLA amendment
Non-recognition of US AMT credits
Adjustments in respect of prior years
Impact of tax rate changes
Amendment in Australia
Foreign tax assessment
Impact of functional currency changes
Other withholding taxes
Mining taxes
Other items
2013
2012
(restated)
$ (2,509)
$ (123)
(181)
(169)
111
(272)
(475)
47
837
322
1,699
119
49
46
183
384
48
5
–
–
–
–
64
134
(25)
72
–
–
21
(22)
(58)
(19)
16
43
175
6
Income tax expense (recovery)
$
630
$ (102)
1. We are able to claim certain allowances and tax deductions unique to
extractive industries that result in a lower effective tax rate.
2. We operate in multiple foreign tax jurisdictions that have tax rates different
than the Canadian statutory rate. Amounts in 2012 included the impact of
impairments in a high tax jurisdiction.
Pueblo Viejo Special Lease Agreement (SLA) Amendment
In third quarter 2013, the Pueblo Viejo Special Lease
Agreement (SLA) Amendment was substantively enacted.
The amendment included the following items: Elimination
of a 10 percent return embedded in the initial capital
investment for purposes of the net profits tax (NPI);
An extension of the period over which Pueblo Viejo will
recover its capital investment; A delay of application of
NPI deductions; A reduction of the depreciation rates;
and the establishment of a graduated minimum tax.
The tax impact of the amendment is a charge of
$384 million, comprised of current tax and deferred tax
expense, including $36 million of graduated minimum
tax related to 2012 sales proceeds.
Non-Recognition of US Alternative Minimum Tax
(AMT) Credits
In fourth quarter 2013, we recorded a deferred tax
expense of $48 million related to US AMT credits which
are not probable to be realized based on our current life
of mine plans.
Tax Rate Changes
In second quarter 2012, a tax rate change was enacted
in the province of Ontario, Canada, resulting in a
deferred tax recovery of $11 million.
In third quarter 2012, a tax rate change was enacted
in Chile, resulting in a current tax expense of $4 million
and deferred tax recovery of $15 million.
Amendment in Australia
In fourth quarter 2012, amendments were made to
prior year tax returns for one of our Australian
consolidated tax groups, based on updated tax pool
amounts from the time of the consolidation election.
These amendments resulted in a current tax recovery of
$44 million and a deferred tax recovery of $14 million.
Foreign Income Tax Assessment
In second quarter 2012, a foreign income tax assessment
was received which resulted in a current tax recovery of
$19 million.
Functional Currency Changes
In fourth quarter 2012, we received approval to prepare
certain of our Papua New Guinea tax returns using a US
dollar functional currency effective January 1, 2012. This
approval resulted in a one-time deferred tax expense
of $16 million. Going forward, the material Papua New
Guinea tax return will now be filed using a US dollar
functional currency.
105
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
12 Earnings (Loss) per Share
For the years ended December 31
($ millions, except shares in millions and per share amounts in dollars)
Loss from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Loss attributable to non-controlling interests
2013
2012 (restated)
Basic
Diluted
Basic
Diluted
$ (10,097)
(506)
237
$ (10,097)
(506)
237
$ (364)
(185)
11
$ (364)
(185)
11
Net loss attributable to equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation
$ (10,366)
$ (10,366)
$ (538)
$ (538)
Weighted average shares outstanding
Stock options
Loss per share data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation
Loss from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net loss
1,022
–
1,022
1,022
–
1,001
–
1,001
–
1,022
1,001
1,001
(9.65)
$
(0.49)
$
$ (10.14)
(9.65)
$
(0.49)
$
$ (10.14)
$ (0.35)
$ (0.19)
$ (0.54)
$ (0.35)
$ (0.19)
$ (0.54)
13 Finance Costs
14 Cash Flow – Other Items
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
a) Operating Cash Flows – Other Items
Interest
Amortization of debt issue costs
Income on interest rate hedges
Interest capitalized1
Accretion
Debt extinguishment fees
Total
$ 775
22
(1)
(297)
68
90
$ 675
17
(4)
(567)
53
–
$ 657
$ 174
1. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the general capitalization rate
was 5.00% (2012: 5.30%)
For the years ended December 31
Adjustments for non-cash income
statement items:
2013
2012
(restated)
Currency translation losses (note 9a)
RSU expense
Stock option expense
Change in estimate of rehabilitation provisions
at closed mines or mines in closure
Inventory impairment charges (note 16)
Accretion
Cash flow arising from changes in:
Derivative assets and liabilities
Other current assets
Value added tax recoverable
Accounts receivable
Other current liabilities
Prepaid assets
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other assets and liabilities
Contingent consideration related to the
$ 180
(1)
8
100
46
68
(269)
(22)
(53)
28
(60)
253
429
18
$ 73
29
16
39
74
53
(38)
18
7
(31)
(14)
(113)
103
(401)
acquisition of the additional 40% of the
Cortez property
Settlement of rehabilitation obligations
–
(56)
(50)
(48)
Other net operating activities
$ 669
$ (283)
106
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
b) Investing Cash Flows – Other Items
For the years ended December 31
Value added tax recoverable on project
capital expenditures
Proceeds from settlement of hedge contracts
Other
Other net investing activities
2013
2012
(restated)
$ (237)
20
(45)
$ (281)
15
(45)
$ (262)
$ (311)
Investing cash flow includes payments for:
Capitalized interest (note 24)
$ 394
$ 547
15 Investments
a) Equity Accounting Method Investment Continuity
At January 1, 2012 (restated)
Loss from equity investees
Funds invested
Impairment charges
Transfer to other investments
At December 31, 2012 (restated)
Funds invested
At December 31, 2013
Publicly traded
b) Other Investments
c) Financing Cash Flows – Other Items
For the years ended December 31
Financing fees on long-term debt
Debt extinguishment fees
Derivative settlements
2013
$ (32)
(90)
4
2012
(restated)
$
(22)
–
(3)
Other net financing activities
$ (118)
$
(25)
Highland Gold
Reko Diq
Kabanga
Total
$ 209
–
–
–
(209)
$
$
–
–
–
Yes
$ 121
(11)
10
(120)
–
$
$
–
–
–
No
$ 341
(12)
20
(120)
(209)
$ 20
7
$ 27
$ 11
(1)
10
–
–
$ 20
7
$ 27
No
As at Dec. 31, 2013
As at Dec. 31, 2012
As at Jan. 1, 2012
Fair value1
Cumulative
losses in AOCI
Cumulative
Fair value1 gains in AOCI
Fair value1
Cumulative
gains in OCI
Available-for-sale securities
$ 120
$ (32)
$ 78
$ 22
$ 161
$ 25
1. Refer to note 25 for further information on the measurement of fair value.
Gains on Investments Recorded in Earnings
For the years ended December 31
Gains realized on sales
Cash proceeds from sales
2013
2012
$ 6
18
$ 6
46
107
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
16 Inventories
Raw materials
Ore in stockpiles
Ore on leach pads
Mine operating supplies
Work in process
Finished products
Gold doré
Copper cathode
Copper concentrate
Gold concentrate
Non-current ore in stockpiles1
Gold
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
$ 1,703
292
956
322
108
–
–
5
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
$ 1,835
334
1,027
209
177
–
–
4
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 1,401
335
757
371
111
–
–
3
$ 3,586
(1,477)
$ 3,386
(1,314)
$ 2,978
(980)
$ 2,109
$ 2,072
$ 1,998
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
$ 236
320
151
6
–
12
47
–
$ 772
(202)
$ 570
1. Ore that we do not expect to process in the next 12 months is classified within other long-term assets.
For the years ended December 31
Inventory impairment charges
Inventory impairment charges reversed
Copper
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
$ 273
298
140
6
–
11
26
–
$ 754
(241)
$ 513
2013
$ 53
(7)
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 189
247
128
6
–
14
89
–
$ 673
(173)
$ 500
2012
(restated)
$ 74
–
Ore on Leach Pads
The recovery of gold and copper from certain oxide ores
is achieved through the heap leaching process. Our
Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Veladero, Cortez, Bald Mountain,
Round Mountain, Ruby Hill and Marigold mines all use a
heap leaching process for gold and our Zaldívar mine
uses a heap leaching process for copper. Under this
method, ore is placed on leach pads where it is treated
with a chemical solution, which dissolves the gold or
copper contained in the ore. The resulting “pregnant”
solution is further processed in a plant where the gold or
copper is recovered. For accounting purposes, costs are
added to ore on leach pads based on current mining and
leaching costs, including applicable depreciation,
depletion and amortization relating to mining operations.
Costs are removed from ore on leach pads as ounces
or pounds are recovered based on the average cost per
recoverable ounce of gold or pound of copper on the
leach pad.
Estimates of recoverable gold or copper on the
leach pads are calculated from the quantities of ore
placed on the leach pads (measured tons added to the
leach pads), the grade of ore placed on the leach pads
(based on assay data) and a recovery percentage
(based on ore type).
Although the quantities of recoverable gold or
copper placed on the leach pads are reconciled by
comparing the grades of ore placed on pads to the
quantities of gold or copper actually recovered
(metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching
process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor
inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing
process is regularly monitored and estimates are refined
based on actual results over time. Historically, our
operating results have not been materially impacted
by variations between the estimated and actual
recoverable quantities of gold or copper on our leach
108
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
pads. At December 31, 2013, the weighted average cost
per recoverable ounce of gold and recoverable pound
of copper on leach pads was $753 per ounce and
$1.28 per pound, respectively (2012: $788 per ounce
of gold and $1.15 per pound of copper and January 1,
2012: $653 per ounce and $1.03 per pound). Variations
between actual and estimated quantities resulting from
changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result
in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted
for on a prospective basis.
The ultimate recovery of gold or copper from a leach
pad will not be known until the leaching process is
concluded. Based on current mine plans, we expect to
place the last ton of ore on our current leach pads at
dates for gold ranging from 2014 to 2026 and for
copper in 2028. Including the estimated time required
for residual leaching, rinsing and reclamation activities,
we expect that our leaching operations will terminate
within a period of up to six years following the date that
the last ton of ore is placed on the leach pad.
The current portion of ore inventory on leach pads is
determined based on estimates of the quantities of gold
or copper at each balance sheet date that we expect to
recover during the next 12 months.
Ore in Stockpiles
Gold
Goldstrike
Pueblo Viejo
Porgera
Cortez
Cowal
Kalgoorlie
Buzwagi
North Mara
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
Turquoise Ridge
Round Mountain
Other
Copper
Zaldívar
Jabal Sayid
Lumwana
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
(restated)
$ 656
271
259
203
129
104
43
42
37
35
17
5
34
140
54
42
$ 545
190
251
209
113
100
81
53
24
34
15
35
53
152
53
68
$ 525
55
149
192
90
99
59
75
22
30
15
47
43
175
–
14
$ 2,071
$ 1,976
$ 1,590
Ore on Leachpads
Gold
Veladero
Cortez
Bald Mountain
Round Mountain
Lagunas Norte
Ruby Hill
Pierina
Marigold
Copper
Zaldívar
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
(restated)
$ 178
56
38
29
18
9
6
–
320
$ 654
$ 115
22
68
15
10
20
15
27
298
$ 590
$ 128
12
61
17
15
9
71
22
247
$ 582
Purchase Commitments
At December 31, 2013, we had purchase obligations for
supplies and consumables of approximately $1,221 million
(2012: $1,859 million).
17 Accounts Receivable and Other Current Assets
Accounts receivable
Amounts due from
concentrate sales
Amounts due from copper
cathode sales
Other receivables
Other current assets
Derivative assets (note 24f)
Goods and services taxes
recoverable1
Prepaid expenses
Other
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 162
$ 139
$ 99
84
139
$ 385
122
188
$ 449
107
220
$ 426
$ 37
$ 124
$ 507
262
81
41
$ 421
226
239
37
$ 626
194
123
52
$ 876
1. Primarily includes VAT and fuel tax receivables of $91 million in Tanzania,
$86 million in Argentina, $24 million in Chile, and $15 million in Peru
(Dec. 31, 2012: $26 million, $82 million, $50 million, and $9 million, Jan. 1,
2012: $22 million, $80 million, $43 million, and $8 million).
109
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
18 Property, Plant and Equipment
At January 1, 2013
Net of accumulated depreciation
Adjustment on currency translation
Additions
Capitalized interest
Disposals
Depreciation
Impairment charges
Transfers5
Assets held for sale
At December 31, 2013
At December 31, 2013
Mining
property
costs
subject to
Mining
property
costs not
subject to
depreciation1,3 depreciation1,2
Buildings, plant
and equipment
Oil and gas
properties4
Total
$ 3,829
$ 8,722
$ 15,863
$ 863
$ 29,277
–
151
–
(531)
(848)
(1,046)
4,691
(36)
–
630
–
4
(1,052)
(1,524)
1,867
(96)
–
4,420
295
(5)
–
(7,078)
(6,539)
(29)
(28)
7
–
(799)
(43)
–
–
–
(28)
5,208
295
(1,331)
(1,943)
(9,648)
19
(161)
$ 6,210
$ 8,551
$ 6,927
$
–
$ 21,688
Cost
Accumulated depreciation and impairments
$ 13,817
(7,607)
$ 20,769
(12,218)
$ 16,602
(9,675)
Net carrying amount – December 31, 2013
$ 6,210
$ 8,551
$ 6,927
$
$
–
–
–
$ 51,188
(29,500)
$ 21,688
Mining
property
costs
subject to
depreciation1,3
Mining
property
costs not
subject to
depreciation1,2
Buildings, plant
and equipment
Oil and gas
properties4
Total
At January 1, 2012 (restated)
Cost
Accumulated depreciation and impairments
$ 9,519
(5,838)
$ 17,036
(7,022)
$ 14,456
(89)
$ 1,281
(267)
$ 42,292
(13,216)
Net carrying amount – January 1, 2012 (restated)
$ 3,681
$ 10,014
$ 14,367
$ 1,014
$ 29,076
Adjustment on currency translation
Additions
Capitalized interest
Disposals
Acquisitions
Depreciation
Impairment charges
Transfers5
At December 31, 2012 (restated)
At December 31, 2012 (restated)
–
203
–
(15)
–
(731)
(9)
700
–
1,464
–
–
–
(1,070)
(2,559)
873
–
5,060
558
(12)
–
–
(2,508)
(1,602)
22
137
–
(2)
–
(101)
(207)
–
22
6,864
558
(29)
–
(1,902)
(5,283)
(29)
$ 3,829
$ 8,722
$ 15,863
$ 863
$ 29,277
Cost
Accumulated depreciation and impairments
$ 10,371
(6,542)
$ 19,373
(10,651)
$ 18,460
(2,597)
$ 1,416
(553)
$ 49,620
(20,343)
Net carrying amount – December 31, 2012 (restated)
$ 3,829
$ 8,722
$ 15,863
$ 863
$ 29,277
1. Includes capitalized reserve acquisition costs, capitalized development costs and capitalized exploration and evaluation costs other than exploration license costs
included in intangible assets.
2. Assets not subject to depreciation includes construction-in-progress, projects and acquired mineral resources and exploration potential at operating mine sites
and development projects.
3. Assets subject to depreciation include the following items for production stage properties: acquired mineral reserves and resources, capitalized mine development
costs, capitalized stripping and capitalized exploration and evaluation costs.
4. Represents Barrick Energy which was divested in July 2013 (refer to note 4b).
5. Primarily relates to long-lived assets that are transferred to PP&E on commissioning of the mine. The Pueblo Viejo mine entered commercial production in early
2013. As a result, all mining property costs not subject to depreciation related to Pueblo Viejo ($4.6 billion at December 31, 2012) were transferred to mining
property costs subject to depreciation in January 2013.
110
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
a) Mineral Property Costs Not Subject to Depreciation
Carrying
amount at
Jan. 1,
2012
(restated)
Carrying
amount at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
Carrying
amount at
Dec. 31,
2013
Construction-in-progress1
Acquired mineral resources and
exploration potential
Projects
Pascua-Lama
Pueblo Viejo2,3
Cerro Casale2
Jabal Sayid
Donlin Gold
$ 1,870
$ 1,590
$ 1,314
272
370
2,639
2,053
–
1,920
687
125
5,861
4,596
1,836
1,497
113
3,749
3,554
1,732
1,282
97
$ 6,927
$ 15,863
$ 14,367
1. Represents assets under construction at our operating mine sites.
2. Amounts are presented on a 100% basis and include our partner’s non-
controlling interest.
3. In first quarter 2013, the property, plant and equipment balance of Pueblo
Viejo was transferred out of project capital as a result of entering production.
b) Changes in Gold and Copper Mineral Reserves
At the end of each fiscal year, as part of our annual
business cycle, we prepare updated estimates of proven
and probable gold and copper mineral reserves for each
mineral property. We prospectively revise calculations of
amortization expense for property, plant and equipment
19 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
a) Goodwill
Gold
amortized using the UOP method, whereby the
denominator is estimated recoverable ounces of gold/
pounds of copper. The effect of changes in estimated
recoverable ounces of gold/pounds of copper based on
a $1,500 gold price assumption on amortization expense
for 2013 was a $45 million decrease (2012: $51 million
decrease). The price for the 2014 LOM plans has been
determined on a $1,100 per ounce of gold for the first
five years and $1,300 per ounce thereafter, which we
will use to calculate amortization expense.
c) Capital Commitments and Operating Leases
In addition to entering into various operational
commitments in the normal course of business, we
had commitments of approximately $249 million
at December 31, 2013 (2012: $1,800 million) for
construction activities at our capital projects.
Operating leases are recognized as an operating cost
in the consolidated statement of income on a straight-
line basis over the lease term. At December 31, 2013, we
have operating lease commitments totaling $233 million,
of which $26 million is expected to be paid within a year,
$106 million is expected to be paid within two to five
years and the remaining amount to be paid beyond
five years.
North
America
Australia
South
America
ABG
Capital
Projects
Copper
Barrick
Energy
Total
Opening balance January 1, 2012
$ 2,376
$ 1,480
$ 441
$ 179
$ 809
$ 4,249
$ 92
$ 9,626
Additions
Other1
Impairments3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(798)
–
3
–
6
3
(798)
Closing balance December 31, 2012 $ 2,376
$ 1,480
$ 441
$ 185
$ 809
$ 3,451
$ 95
$ 8,837
Additions
Other2
Impairments3
Transfers4
–
(18)
–
412
–
(74)
(1,200)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(185)
–
–
–
(397)
(412)
–
–
(1,033)
–
Closing balance December 31, 2013 $ 2,770
$ 206
$ 441
$
–
$
–
$ 2,418
$ 2,788
$ 1,480
$ 441
$ 185
$ 397
$ 4,249
–
–
(95)
–
$ –
$ 95
–
(92)
(2,910)
–
$ 5,835
$ 9,635
(18)
(1,274)
–
(185)
(397)
(1,831)
(95)
(3,800)
Net carrying amount
$ 2,770
$ 206
$ 441
$
–
$
–
$ 2,418
$ –
$ 5,835
1. Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on the translation of Barrick Energy from C $ to US $.
2. Represents the allocation of Goodwill to assets held for sale as well as the disposition of YSS assets.
3. Refer to note 20.
4. In the first quarter 2013 we transferred $412 million of goodwill from the Capital Projects segment to the North American segment as a result of Pueblo Viejo
entering production.
111
Cost
Accumulated impairment losses
and other
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
As a result of the reorganization of our operating
segments in fourth quarter 2013, we reallocated goodwill,
which had previously been recorded in our Regional
Business Units (our former operating segments), to the
new Operating Units on a relative fair value basis except
for Pueblo Viejo, which had specifically identified
goodwill from the earlier allocation in 2013. The
reorganization of the Operating Units did not result
in any indicators of impairment (see note 20).
At December 31, 2013, goodwill allocated to each
operating segment is as follows:
Goldstrike
Cortez
Pueblo
Viejo
Lagunas
Norte
Veladero
North America –
Other
Australia-
Pacific
Copper
Total
Net carrying amount
$ 730
$ 869
$ 412
$ 247
$ 195
$ 758
$ 206
$ 2,418 $ 5,835
b) Intangible Assets
Opening balance January 1, 2012
Additions
Amortization and impairment losses
Closing balance December 31, 2012
Additions
Amortization and impairment losses
Closing balance December 31, 2013
Cost
Accumulated amortization and impairment losses
Net carrying amount December 31, 2013
Water
rights1
$ 116
–
–
Technology2
Supply
contracts3
Exploration
potential4
$ 17
$ 23
$ 413
–
–
–
(1)
54
(169)
Total
$ 569
54
(170)
$ 116
$ 17
$ 22
$ 298
$ 453
–
–
$ 116
$ 116
–
$ 116
–
(1)
$ 16
$ 17
(1)
$ 16
–
(2)
–
(130)
–
(133)
$ 20
$ 168
$ 320
$ 39
(19)
$ 467
(299)
$ 639
(319)
$ 20
$ 168
$ 320
1. Relates to water rights in South America which are subject to annual impairment testing and will be amortized through cost of sales when we begin using these
in the future.
2. The amount will be amortized through cost of sales using the UOP method over the estimated proven and probable reserves of the Pueblo Viejo mine, with no
assumed residual value.
3. Relates to a supply agreement with Michelin North America Inc. to secure a supply of tires and is amortized over the effective term of the contract through cost of sales.
4. Exploration potential consists of the estimated fair value attributable to exploration licenses acquired as a result of a business combination or asset acquisition.
The carrying value of the licenses will be transferred to PP&E when the development of attributable mineral resources commences (note 2m(i)).
20 Impairment of Goodwill and Non-Current Assets
In accordance with our accounting policy, goodwill is
tested for impairment in the fourth quarter and also
when there is an indicator of impairment. Non-current
assets are tested for impairment when events or changes
in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may
not be recoverable.
When there is an indicator of impairment of non-
current assets within an operating segment consisting
of a Cash Generating Unit (“CGU”) or group of CGUs
that contain goodwill, we test the non-current assets
for impairment first and recognize any impairment loss
on the non-current assets before testing the operating
segment for any potential goodwill impairment. When
there is an indicator of impairment of non-current assets
within an operating segment consisting of a single CGU
that contains goodwill, we test the non-current assets for
impairment first and recognize any impairment loss on
goodwill first and then any remaining impairment loss is
applied against the non-current assets.
An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying
amount exceeds the recoverable amount. The recoverable
amount of each operating segment for goodwill testing
purposes has been determined based on its estimated
fair value less cost of disposal (“FVLCD”), which has
been determined to be greater than the Value in Use
(“VIU”) amounts. The recoverable amount for non-current
asset testing is calculated using the same approach as for
goodwill, however, the assessment is done at the CGU
level, which is the lowest level for which identifiable cash
flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other
assets. A CGU is generally an individual operating mine
or development project.
112
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Summary of Impairments
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded
impairment losses of $9.9 billion (2012: $5.5 billion) for
non-current assets and $2.8 billion (2012: $798 million)
for goodwill, as summarized in the following table:
For the years ended December 31
Pascua-Lama
Lumwana
Buzwagi
Porgera
Veladero
Jabal Sayid
Exploration (Tusker, Kainantu, Saudi Licenses)
North Mara
Pierina
Reko Diq
Kanowna
Highland Gold
Granny Smith
Round Mountain
Ruby Hill PPE Write Off
Marigold Mine
Bald Mountain
Darlot
Plutonic
PV Power Asset
Tulawaka
AFS Investments
Other
2013
$ 6,061
–
721
746
464
860
112
286
140
–
41
–
73
78
66
60
16
36
37
–
16
26
33
2012
(restated)
–
$
4,982
–
–
–
–
169
–
–
120
–
86
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
46
31
46
16
Total non-current asset impairment losses
$ 9,872
$ 5,496
Australia goodwill
Copper goodwill
Capital Project goodwill
ABG goodwill
1,200
1,033
397
185
–
798
–
–
Total goodwill impairment losses
$ 2,815
$ 798
Total impairment losses
$ 12,687
$ 6,294
2013 Indicators of Impairment
Second Quarter 2013
The significant decrease in our long-term gold, silver
and copper price assumptions in second quarter 2013,
due to declining market prices, as well as the regulatory
challenges to Pascua-Lama in May 2013 and the resulting
schedule delays and associated capital expenditure
increases; and a significant change to the mine plan
at our Pierina mine, were all considered indicators of
impairment, and, accordingly, we performed an
impairment assessment for every mine site and
significant advanced development project. As a result
of this assessment, we recorded non-current asset
impairment losses of $7.1 billion, including a $5.2 billion
impairment loss related to the carrying value of the PP&E
at Pascua-Lama; $501 million related to the Jabal Sayid
project in our copper segment; $874 million related
to Buzwagi and North Mara in African Barrick Gold;
$236 million related to the Kanowna, Granny Smith,
Plutonic and Darlot mines in our Australia Pacific Gold
segment; and $140 million related to our Pierina mine in
South America.
After reflecting the above non-current asset
impairment losses, we conducted goodwill impairment
tests and determined that the carrying value of our
Copper, Australia Pacific Gold, Capital Projects and
African Barrick Gold segments exceeded their FVLCD,
and therefore we recorded a total goodwill impairment
loss of $2.3 billion. The FVLCD of our copper segment
was negatively impacted by the decrease in our long-
term copper price assumption in second quarter 2013.
The FVLCD of our Australia Pacific Gold segment was
negatively impacted by the significant decrease in second
quarter 2013 in our long-term gold price assumption.
The FVLCD of our Capital Projects segment was
negatively impacted by the significant decrease in
second quarter 2013 in our long-term gold and silver
price assumptions, as well as the schedule delays
and associated capital expenditure increase at our
Pascua-Lama project. The FVLCD of our African Barrick
Gold segment was negatively impacted by significant
changes in the life of mine (“LOM”) plans in second
quarter 2013 for various assets in the segment, as
well as the significant decrease in our long-term gold
price assumption.
Third Quarter 2013
In September 2013, we finalized an agreement with
the Government of the Dominican Republic (“the
Government”) concerning amendments to the SLA.
The amendments will result in significant additional
and accelerated tax revenues to the Government, and
therefore we determined this was an indicator of
impairment. Based on our assessment of the economic
impact of these amendments, the carrying value of the
mine was recoverable as at September 30, 2013.
Fourth Quarter 2013
In fourth quarter 2013, as described below, we identified
indicators of impairment at certain of our mines,
resulting in non-current asset impairment losses totaling
$2.8 billion. As a result of our fourth quarter 2013
decision to temporarily suspend construction of our
Pascua-Lama Project, we have recorded a further
impairment loss on the project of $896 million, bringing
the total impairment loss for Pascua-Lama to $6.1 billion
113
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
for the full year. At our Porgera mine in Papua New
Guinea, we have changed our LOM plan to focus
primarily on the higher grade underground mine. The
new plan resulted in a decrease in the estimated mine
life from 13 to 9 years, and a decrease in the estimated
FVLCD of the mine, which has resulted in an impairment
loss of $746 million. At our Veladero mine in Argentina,
the annual update to the LOM plan, which was completed
in fourth quarter 2013, was significantly impacted by the
lower gold price assumption as well as the effect of
sustained local inflationary pressures on operating and
capital costs. The new plan resulted in a reduction of
reserves and LOM production. This resulted in a
significant decrease in the estimated FVLCD of the mine,
and accordingly, we recorded an impairment loss of
$462 million. The annual update to the LOM plan
resulted in a decrease in the net present value of our
Jabal Sayid project, which is the basis for estimating
the project’s FVLCD, and was therefore considered
an indicator of impairment. Jabal Sayid’s FVLCD was
also negatively impacted by the delay in achieving
first production as a result of the HCIS compliance
requirements and ongoing discussions with the DMMR
with respect to the transfer of ownership of the
project. As a result, we recorded an impairment loss of
$359 million. The annual update to the LOM plan
showed a decrease in the net present value at our Round
Mountain mine, which was considered to be an indicator
of impairment, and we recorded an impairment loss of
$78 million. At North Mara, several changes were made
to the LOM plan, including a decision to defer Gokona
Cut 3, while ABG finalizes a feasibility study into the
alternative of mining out this reserve by underground
methods. This was considered an indicator of impairment
for North Mara, resulting in an impairment loss of
$133 million. A wall failure at our Ruby Hill mine in
Nevada was also identified as an indicator of impairment,
resulting in the impairment of assets specifically related
to the open pit of $51 million.
As at December 31, 2013, four of our mines, namely
Plutonic, Kanowna, Marigold and Tulawaka, met the
criteria as assets held for sale. Accordingly, we are
required to re-measure these CGUs to the lower of
carrying value and FVLCD. Using these new re-measured
values, resulted in impairment losses of $17 million at
Plutonic and $60 million at Marigold. Also, based on the
estimated FVLCD of the expected proceeds related to the
expected sale of Kanowna, we have reversed $66 million
of the impairment loss recorded in second quarter 2013.
After reflecting the above non-current asset
impairment losses, we conducted our annual goodwill
impairment test, prior to the reorganization of our
operating segments, and determined that the carrying
value of our Australia Pacific segment exceeded its
FVLCD and therefore we recorded a goodwill impairment
loss of $551 million bringing the total impairment
loss for Australia Pacific Gold goodwill to $1,200 million
for the full year. After the reorganization of the
operating segments, we did not identify any indicators
of impairment.
2012 Indicators of Impairment
In fourth quarter 2012, we prepared an updated LOM
plan for Lumwana, which reflected information obtained
from an extensive exploration and infill drilling program
that was completed late in the fourth quarter of 2012.
The new LOM plan also reflected revised operating and
sustaining capital costs. In particular, unit mining costs
were determined to be significantly higher than
previously estimated. The significant changes in the
LOM plan were considered an indicator of impairment,
and, accordingly, we performed an impairment
assessment for Lumwana as at the end of the 2012.
As a result of this assessment, we recorded an
impairment loss of $5.0 billion, related to the carrying
value of the non-current assets at Lumwana in the
fourth quarter of 2012.
In fourth quarter 2012, we also recorded the
following impairment losses: $31 million in PP&E
impairment losses related to Tulawaka in our ABG
segment, primarily as a result of a decrease in the
expected remaining mine life in its most recent LOM
plan; $120 million related to our equity method
investment in Tethyan Copper Company, which holds
our interest in the Reko Diq project; and a $46 million
write-down of power-related assets at our Pueblo Viejo
project, based on new information with respect to the
recoverable amount of these assets received in fourth
quarter 2012.
Other impairment losses recorded in 2012 included:
$165 million related to exploration properties, included
in intangible assets, in Papua New Guinea and Saudi
Arabia as a result of our decision to cease exploration
activities ($141 million in Papua New Guinea in third
quarter 2012 and $24 million in Saudi Arabia in fourth
quarter 2012); and $84 million related to our equity
method investment in Highland Gold as a result of the
disposition of our equity interest in first quarter 2012.
114
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 After reflecting the above non-current asset losses,
we conducted our goodwill impairment tests and
determined that the carrying value of our copper
segment exceeded its FVLCD, and therefore we recorded
a goodwill impairment loss of $798 million. The FVLCD
of our copper segment was impacted by increases in
expected future operating and capital costs.
Key Assumptions
The key assumptions and estimates used in determining
the FVLCD are related to commodity prices, discount
rates, NAV multiples for gold assets, operating costs,
exchange rates and capital expenditures. In addition,
assumptions related to comparable entities, market
values per ounce and per pound and the inclusion of
reserves and resources in market multiples calculations
are used.
Gold
For the gold segments, excluding Pascua-Lama, FVLCD
for each of the CGUs was determined by calculating the
net present value (“NPV”) of the future cash flows
expected to be generated by the mines and projects
within the segments. The estimates of future cash flows
were derived from the most recent LOM plans and,
where the LOM plans exclude a material portion of total
reserves and resources, we assign value to resources not
considered in these base models. These values are then
aggregated to the segment level, the level at which
goodwill is tested. Based on observable market or
publicly available data, including spot and forward prices
and equity sell-side analyst forecasts, we make an
assumption of future gold and silver prices to estimate
future revenues. The future cash flows for each gold
mine are discounted using a real weighted average cost
of capital (“WACC”), which reflects specific market risk
factors for each mine. Some gold companies trade at a
market capitalization greater than the NPV of their
expected cash flows. Market participants describe this as
a “NAV multiple”, which represents the multiple applied
to the NPV to arrive at the trading price. The NAV
multiple is generally understood to take account of a
variety of additional value factors such as the exploration
potential of the mineral property, namely the ability to
find and produce more metal than what is currently
included in the LOM plan or reserve and resource
estimates, and the benefit of gold price optionality. As a
result, we applied a specific NAV multiple to the NPV of
each CGU within each gold segment based on the NAV
multiples observed in the market in recent periods and
that we judged to be appropriate to the CGU.
Pascua-Lama
The fair value for Pascua-Lama was determined by
considering both the NPV, determined consistent with
our gold CGUs, as well as market multiples expressed as
dollar per ounce of proven and probable reserves based
on observed market metrics for comparable assets. Both
these approaches were used, with the market approach
being the primary method as the LOM for Pascua-Lama
has uncertainty due to adjustments to reflect the
updated estimated timeline for the project that existed
at the time of the testing. The observable market
multiples were adjusted, where appropriate, for country
risk if the comparable asset was in a different country
and any change in metal prices since the valuation date
of the comparable asset.
Copper
For our Copper segment, the FVLCD for each of the
CGUs was determined based on the NPV of future cash
flows expected to be generated using the most recent
LOM plans aggregated to the segment level. Based on
observable market or publicly available data including
spot and forward prices and equity sell-side analyst
consensus, we make an assumption of future copper
prices to estimate future revenues. The future cash flows
for each copper mine were discounted using a WACC
depending on the location and market risk factors for
each mine. Fair value for Lumwana was also estimated
by considering market multiples expressed as dollar per
pound based primarily on the observed valuation metrics
for comparable assets. Both these approaches were used
as the LOM for Lumwana has uncertainty due to the
ongoing optimization program to generate additional
value from the LOM. The observable market multiples
were adjusted where appropriate for country risk if the
comparable asset was in a different country and any
change in metal prices since the valuation date of the
comparable asset.
115
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 The key assumptions used in our impairment testing
are summarized in the table below:
Gold price per oz
Silver price per oz
Copper price per lb
WACC – gold (range)
WACC – gold (avg)
WACC – copper (range)
WACC – copper (avg)
NAV multiple – gold (avg)
LOM years – gold (range)
LOM years – gold (avg)
LOM years – copper (range)
LOM years – copper (avg)
Reserves – gold price per oz1
Reserves – silver price per oz
Reserves – copper price per lb
ARS:USD exchange rate
Fourth
Quarter
2013
$ 1,300
$
23
$ 3.25
2%–7%
5%
7%–9%
7%
1.1
3–29
13
14–24
18
$ 1,100
21
$
$ 3.00
8.5–10.0
Fourth
Quarter
2012
$ 1,700
$
32
$ 3.65
3%–8%
5%
6%–8%
7%
1.2
2–32
14
13–33
21
$ 1,500
$
28
$ 3.00
5.0–5.5
1. In our LOM plans we used $1,100/oz for the first 5 years and $1,300/oz
thereafter.
Sensitivities
We performed a sensitivity analysis on commodity price,
which is the key assumption that impacts the impairment
calculations. We assumed a negative 10% change for
the assumption, taking sales price from $1,300 per
ounce down to $1,170 per ounce for gold, $3.25 per
pound down to $2.93 per pound for copper and $23 per
ounce to $20.70 per ounce for silver, while holding all
other assumptions constant. We note that this sensitivity
identifies the key assets where the decrease in the sales
price, in isolation, could cause the carrying value of our
operating segments to exceed its recoverable amount
for the purposes of the goodwill impairment test or
the carrying value of any of our CGUs to exceed its
recoverable amount for the purposes of the non-current
asset impairment test where an indicator of impairment
for the non-current asset was identified.
Should there be a significant decline in commodity
prices, we would take actions to assess the implications on
our life of mine plans, including the determination of
reserves and resources, and the appropriate cost structure
for the operating segments. The recoverable amount of
the operating segments and CGUs would also be impacted
by other market factors such as changes in net asset value
multiples and the value per ounce/pound of comparable
market entities. Based on the results of the impairment
testing performed in fourth quarter 2013, the carrying
value of the operating segments and CGUs that are most
sensitive to the change in sales prices used in the test are:
As at December 31, 2013
Carrying value
Decrease in fair value
with a 10% decrease
in sales price
Copper segment1
Australia Pacific segment1
Cerro Casale
Veladero1
Lumwana1
Jabal Sayid1
Porgera1
North Mara1
Round Mountain1
$ 5,299
1,488
1,514
1,009
1,008
711
393
369
166
$ 1,700
850
1,200
600
850
80
390
130
150
1. These operating segments/CGUs have been impaired in either 2012 or 2013
and therefore their fair value approximates carrying value.
In addition, for our Pascua-Lama project, we have
determined our valuation primarily based on a market
approach. The key assumption that impacts the
impairment calculations, should there be an indication
of impairment for this CGU, is the value per ounce
of gold and silver based on an analysis of comparable
companies. We assumed a negative 10% change for
the assumption of gold and silver value per ounce,
while holding all other assumptions constant and, based
on the results of the impairment testing performed in
fourth quarter 2013 for Pascua-Lama, the fair value
of the CGU would have been reduced from $1.2 billion
to $1.1 billion (December 31, 2013 carrying value:
$1.2 billion). We note that this sensitivity identifies the
decrease in the value that, in isolation, would cause the
carrying value of the CGU to exceed its recoverable
amount. For Pascua-Lama, this value decrease is linear
to the decrease in value per ounce.
116
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
21 Other Assets
24 Financial Instruments
Derivative assets (note 24f)
Goods and services taxes
recoverable1
Notes receivable
Other
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
$
10
$ 183
$ 455
618
112
326
514
149
218
272
121
154
$ 1,066
$ 1,064
$ 1,002
1. Includes VAT and fuel tax receivables of $519 million in Argentina, $54 million
in Tanzania and $45 million in Chile (Dec. 31, 2012: $397 million, $72 million
and $45 million, Jan. 1, 2012: $177 million, $63 million and $32 million). The
VAT in Argentina is currently estimated to be recoverable once Pascua-Lama
has entered production.
22 Accounts Payable
Financial instruments include cash; evidence of ownership
in an entity; or a contract that imposes an obligation
on one party and conveys a right to a second entity to
deliver/receive cash or another financial instrument.
Information on certain types of financial instruments is
included elsewhere in these consolidated financial
statements as follows: accounts receivable – note 17;
investments – note 15; restricted share units – note 33b.
a) Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include cash, term deposits,
treasury bills and money market investments with
original maturities of less than 90 days.
Cash and Equivalents
Accounts payable1
Accruals
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
(restated)
$ 1,058
1,107
$ 1,020
1,247
$ 965
1,120
$ 2,165
$ 2,267
$ 2,085
Cash deposits
Term deposits
Money market investments
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
$ 648
235
1,521
$ 1,155
184
758
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
(restated)
$ 1,013
278
1,458
$ 2,404
$ 2,097
$ 2,749
1. Includes $171 million related to severance and demobilization costs at
Pascua-Lama, which arose as a result of our decision to suspend construction
of our Pascua-Lama project. We incurred various costs to demobilize our
contractors and employees from the project.
23 Other Current Liabilities
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
Provision for environmental
rehabilitation (note 26)
Derivative liabilities (note 24f)
Post-retirement benefits (note 34)
Restricted stock units (note 33b)
Contingent purchase consideration
Other
$ 105
31
–
19
–
148
$ 74
10
5
28
–
144
$ 79
22
14
27
50
134
$ 303
$ 261
$ 326
Of total cash and cash equivalents as of December 31,
2013, $305 million (2012: $434 million and January 1,
2012: $616 million) was held in subsidiaries which have
regulatory regulations, contractual restrictions or operate
in countries where exchange controls and other legal
restrictions apply and are therefore not available for
general use by the Company. In addition, $936 million
(2012: $1,081 and January 1, 2012: $1,904 million) of
cash and equivalents is held in subsidiaries where we
have determined the cash is reinvested, for the foreseeable
future for the calculation of deferred income tax.
117
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
b) Long-Term Debt1
2013
1.75%/2.9%/4.4%/5.7% notes3
3.85%/5.25% notes
4.875%/5.80% notes
5.75%/6.35% notes
Other fixed rate notes4
Project financing
Capital leases
Other debt obligations
Credit facility
2012 Credit facility
2.5%/4.10%/5.75% notes5
ABG Credit facility6
Less: current portion7
1.75%/2.9%/4.4%/5.7% notes3
3.85%/5.25% notes
4.875%/5.80% notes
5.75%/6.35% notes
Other fixed rate notes4
Project financing
Capital leases
Other debt obligations
Equinox credit facility
Credit facility
Less: current portion7
At Dec. 31
Proceeds
Repayments
Amortization
and other2
$ 2,406
1,983
395
855
2,712
941
240
829
–
–
2,577
142
$ 13,080
(179)
$
–
–
–
–
–
94
–
178
–
2,000
3,000
142
$ 5,414
–
$ 1,571
–
350
136
500
45
93
119
1,200
2,000
398
–
$ 6,412
–
$ 6
2
1
1
4
2
148
(4)
–
–
(25)
–
$ 135
–
At Jan. 1
$ 3,971
1,981
744
990
3,208
890
185
774
1,200
–
–
–
$ 13,943
(1,848)
$ 12,901
$ 5,414
$ 6,412
$ 135
$ 12,095
2012
At Dec. 31
Proceeds
Repayments
Amortization
and other2
$ 3,971
1,981
744
990
3,208
890
185
774
–
1,200
$ 13,943
(1,848)
$
–
2,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
$ 2,000
–
$
–
–
–
–
–
–
44
118
1,000
300
$ 1,462
–
$ 12,095
$ 2,000
$ 1,462
$ (1)
(19)
(6)
2
18
17
26
(7)
6
–
$ 36
–
$ 36
At Jan. 1
$ 3,972
–
750
988
3,190
873
203
899
994
1,500
$ 13,369
(196)
$ 13,173
1. The agreements that govern our long-term debt each contain various provisions which are not summarized herein. These provisions allow Barrick to, at its option,
redeem indebtedness prior to maturity at specified prices and also may permit redemption of debt by Barrick upon the occurrence of certain specified changes in
tax legislation.
2. Amortization of debt premium/discount and increases in capital leases.
3. Consists of $2.4 billion through our wholly-owned subsidiary Barrick North America Finance LLC (“BNAF Notes”), $229 million that matures in 2016, $1.35 billion
that matures in 2021 and $850 million that matures in 2041. We provide an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee on all BNAF Notes and generally provide such
guarantees on all BNAF notes issued, which will rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.
4. Consists of $1.25 billion through our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary Barrick (PD) Australia Finance Pty Ltd. (“BPDAF”), of which $850 million that matures in 2039
and $400 million that matures in 2020. We provide an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee of all BPDAF debt and generally provide such guarantees on all
BPDAF notes issued, which will rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. Also consists of $750 million in notes that mature in 2019,
$500 million in notes that mature in 2018 and $250 million in notes that mature in 2038.
5. Consists of $2.6 billion in conjunction with our wholly-owned subsidiary Barrick North America Finance LLC (“BNAF”). This consists of $252 million of 2.50% notes
due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) and $1.5 billion of 4.10% notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”) of Barrick as well as $850 million of 5.75% notes due 2043 (the “2043
Notes”) of BNAF. We provide an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee on all BNAF Notes and generally provide such guarantees on all BNAF notes issued, which
will rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.
6. Consists of an export credit backed term loan facility.
7. The current portion of long-term debt consists of project financing ($102 million, 2012: $45 million), other debt obligations ($39 million, 2012: $65 million), and
capital leases ($38 million, 2012: $38 million). The current portion of long-term debt for 2012 also includes a credit facility ($1,200 million) and other fixed rate
notes ($500 million).
118
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
1.75%/2.9%/4.4%/5.7% Notes
In June 2011, Barrick, and our wholly-owned subsidiary
Barrick North America Finance LLC (”BNAF”), issued an
aggregate of $4.0 billion in debt securities comprised of:
$700 million of 1.75% notes that had an original
maturity date in 2014 and $1.1 billion of 2.90% notes
that had an original maturity date mature in 2016 issued
by Barrick (collectively, the “Barrick Notes”) as well as
$1.35 billion of 4.40% notes that mature in 2021 and
$850 million of 5.70% notes that mature in 2041 issued
by BNAF (collectively, the “BNAF Notes”). Barrick
provides an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee of
the BNAF Notes. The Barrick Notes and the guarantee in
respect of the BNAF Notes will rank equally with Barrick’s
other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.
During the year, the entire balance ($700 million) of
the 1.75% notes was repaid along with $871 million
out of the $1.1 billion of 2.9% notes.
3.85 and 5.25 Notes
On April 3, 2012, we issued an aggregate of $2 billion in
debt securities comprised of $1.25 billion of 3.85%
notes that mature in 2022 and $750 million of 5.25%
notes that mature in 2042. $1.0 billion of the net
proceeds from this offering were used to repay the
existing indebtedness under the 2012 Credit Facility.
Other Fixed Rate Notes
On October 16, 2009, we issued two tranches of
debentures totaling $1.25 billion through our wholly-
owned indirect subsidiary Barrick (PD) Australia Finance
Pty Ltd. (“BPDAF”) consisting of $850 million of 30-year
notes with a coupon rate of 5.95%, and $400 million of
10-year notes with a coupon rate of 4.95% (collectively
the “Notes”). BPDAF used the proceeds to provide loans
to us for settling the Gold Hedges1 and some of the
Floating Contracts1. In exchange, we provide sufficient
funds to BPDAF to meet the principal and interest
obligations on the notes. We also provided an
unconditional and irrevocable guarantee of these
payments, which will rank equally with our other
unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.
On March 19, 2009, we issued an aggregate of
$750 million of 10-year notes with a coupon rate of
6.95% for general corporate purposes. The notes are
unsecured, unsubordinated obligations and will rank
equally with our other unsecured, unsubordinated
obligations.
1.
Gold Hedges were fixed price (non-participating) gold contracts and the
Floating Contracts were spot-price (fully-participating) gold contracts.
In September 2008, we issued an aggregate of
$1.25 billion of notes through our wholly-owned indirect
subsidiaries Barrick North America Finance LLC and
Barrick Gold Financeco LLC (collectively the “LLCs”)
consisting of $500 million of 5-year notes with a coupon
rate of 6.125%, $500 million of 10-year notes with a
coupon rate of 6.8%, and $250 million of 30-year notes
with a coupon rate of 7.5% (collectively the “Notes”).
The LLCs used the proceeds to provide loans to us. We
provide sufficient funds to the LLCs to meet the principal
and interest obligations on the Notes. We also provided
an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee of these
payments, which will rank equally with our other
unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.
During the year, the entire balance ($500 million) of
the 5-year notes with coupon rate of 6.125% that was
due in September 2013 was repaid.
Pueblo Viejo Project Financing Agreement
In April 2010, Barrick and Goldcorp finalized terms for
$1.035 billion (100% basis) in project financing for
Pueblo Viejo. The project financing is non-recourse
subject to guarantees provided by Barrick and Goldcorp
for their proportionate share which will terminate upon
Pueblo Viejo meeting certain operating completion
tests and are subject to an exclusion for certain political
risk events. The lending syndicate is comprised of
international financial institutions including export
development agencies and commercial banks. The
amount is divided into three tranches of $400 million,
$375 million and $260 million with tenors of 15, 15 and
12 years, respectively. The $400 million tranche bears a
coupon of LIBOR+3.25% pre-completion and scales
gradually to LIBOR+5.10% (inclusive of political risk
insurance premium) for years 13–15. The $375 million
tranche bears a fixed coupon of 3.86% for the entire
15 years. The $260 million tranche bears a coupon
of LIBOR+3.25% pre-completion and scales gradually
to LIBOR+4.85% (inclusive of political risk insurance
premium) for years 11–12.
We have drawn the entire $1.035 billion to date.
During the year, $45 million of loans was repaid. The
remaining principal balance under the Pueblo Viejo
Financing Agreement is $990 million.
119
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Credit Facility
We had a credit and guarantee agreement (the “Credit
Facility”) with certain Lenders which required such
lenders to make available to us a credit facility of up to
$1.45 billion ($1.5 billion prior to second quarter 2012)
or the equivalent amount in Canadian dollars. We drew
$1.5 billion on the Credit Facility in 2011 to finance
a portion of the Equinox acquisition, including the
payment of related fees and expenses. The Credit Facility,
which was unsecured, had an interest rate of LIBOR
plus 0.25% to 0.35% on drawn down amounts, and a
commitment rate of 0.07% to 0.08% on undrawn
amounts. $50 million matured in the second quarter of
2012 and an additional $250 million was repaid during
the second quarter of 2012. The remaining $1.2 billion
was repaid in 2013. Subsequent to the repayment, we
terminated the Credit Facility.
Refinancing of the Credit Facility
In January 2012, we finalized a credit and guarantee
agreement (the “2012 Credit Facility”) with certain
Lenders, which requires such Lenders to make available
to us a credit facility of $4.0 billion or the equivalent
amount in Canadian dollars. The 2012 Credit Facility,
which is unsecured, currently has an interest rate of
LIBOR plus 1.50% on drawn amounts, and a commitment
rate of 0.25% on undrawn amounts. The $4.0 billion
facility matures in 2019. In first quarter 2013, we drew
$2.0 billion on our $4.0 billion revolving credit facility
(“2012 Credit Facility”), using the proceeds to repay
$1.2 billion on our $1.45 billion credit facility, which
expired in April 2013. In second quarter 2013, we
issued $3.0 billion of debt, using $2.0 billion of the net
proceeds to repay the outstanding balance on the 2012
Credit Facility. The 2012 Credit Facility is undrawn as
at December 31, 2013.
2.50%/4.10%/5.75% Notes
On May 2, 2013, we issued an aggregate of $3 billion
in notes through our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary
Barrick North America Finance LLC consisting of
$650 million of 2.50% notes that mature in 2018,
$1.5 billion of 4.10% notes that mature in 2023 and
$850 million of 5.75% notes that mature in 2043.
$2.0 billion of the net proceeds from this offering were
used to repay existing indebtedness under our $4 billion
revolving credit facility which matures in 2019. We
provided an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee
of these payments, which will rank equally with our
other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.
During the year, $398 million of the $650 million
2.50% notes were repaid.
ABG Credit Facility
In January 2013, ABG concluded negotiations with a
group of commercial banks for the provision of an export
credit backed term loan facility (“Facility”) for the
amount of US$142 million. The Facility has been put in
place to fund a substantial portion of the construction
costs of the new CIL circuit at the process plant at the
Bulyanhulu Project (“Project”). The Facility is collateralized
by the Project, has a term of seven years and, when
drawn, the spread over LIBOR will be 250 basis points.
The Facility is repayable in equal installments over the
term of the Facility, after a two year repayment holiday
period. The interest rate has been fixed at an effective
rate of 3.6% through the use of an interest rate swap.
At December 31, 2013, the full value of the Facility has
been drawn.
Debt Issue Costs
In 2013, a total of $30 million of debt issue costs arose
from debt issued during the year. In 2012, a total of
$15 million of debt issue costs arose from debt issued
during the year.
120
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Interest
For the years ended December 31
1.75%/2.9%/4.4%/5.7% notes
3.85%/5.2% notes
4.875%/5.80% notes
5.75%/6.35% notes
Other fixed rate notes
Project financing
Capital leases
Other debt obligations
Equinox credit facility
Credit facility
2012 Credit facility
2.5%/4.10%/5.75% notes
ABG credit facility
Deposits on silver contracts (note 28)
Accretion
Other interest
Debt extinguishment fees
Less: interest capitalized
Cash interest paid
Amortization of debt issue costs
(Gain) on interest rate hedges
(Decrease) Increase in interest accruals
Accretion
Debt extinguishment fees
Interest cost
2013
2012
Effective
rate1
Interest
cost
Effective
rate1
3.97%
4.34%
5.58%
6.11%
6.53%
4.77%
3.20%
5.12%
–
0.88%
1.47%
4.30%
2.80%
8.59%
3.84%
4.42%
5.43%
6.20%
6.53%
3.72%
3.89%
5.52%
1.73%
0.89%
–
–
–
8.59%
$ 154
66
41
62
213
33
7
43
4
12
–
–
–
46
53
7
–
$ 741
(567)
$ 174
$ 665
17
(4)
10
53
–
$ 741
Interest
cost
$ 153
87
40
60
202
46
6
42
–
2
5
85
2
55
68
11
90
$ 954
(297)
$ 657
$ 1,056
22
(1)
(281)
68
90
$ 954
1. The effective rate includes the stated interest rate under the debt agreement, amortization of debt issue costs and debt discount/premium and the impact of interest
rate contracts designated in a hedging relationship with debt.
Scheduled Debt Repayments1
1.75%/2.9%/4.4%/5.7% notes
3.85%/5.2% notes
4.875%/5.80% notes
5.75%/6.35% notes
Other fixed rate notes
Project financing
Other debt obligations
2.5%/4.10%/5.75% notes
ABG credit facility
Minimum annual payments
under capital leases
2014
$
–
–
–
–
–
102
39
–
–
$ 141
2015
$
–
–
–
–
–
98
145
–
14
$ 257
2016
$ 229
–
–
264
–
98
41
–
29
$ 661
2017
$
–
–
–
–
–
99
–
–
28
$ 127
2018
$
–
–
–
–
500
98
–
252
28
2019 and
thereafter
$ 2,200
2,000
400
600
2,250
495
566
2,350
43
Total
$ 2,429
2,000
400
864
2,750
990
791
2,602
142
$ 878
$ 10,904
$ 12,968
$ 38
$ 45
$ 39
$ 35
$ 28
$
54
$
239
1. This table illustrates the contractual undiscounted cash flows, and may not agree with the amounts disclosed in the consolidated balance sheet.
121
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
c) Derivative Instruments (“Derivatives”)
In the normal course of business, our assets, liabilities
and forecasted transactions, as reported in US dollars,
are impacted by various market risks including, but not
limited to:
Item
Sales
Impacted by
Prices of gold, silver
and copper
By-product credits
Prices of silver, copper
and gold
Cost of sales
Consumption of diesel fuel,
propane, natural gas and
electricity
Prices of diesel fuel,
propane, natural gas,
and electricity
Non-US dollar expenditures
Corporate and operating
segment administration,
exploration and
evaluation costs
Capital expenditures
Currency exchange rates –
US dollar versus A$, ARS,
C$, CLP, EUR, JPY, PGK,
TZS, ZAR, and ZMW
Currency exchange rates –
US dollar versus A$, ARS,
C$, CLP, GBP, JPY, PGK,
TZS and ZAR
Non-US dollar capital
Currency exchange
expenditures
rates – US dollar versus
A$, ARS, C$, CLP, EUR,
GBP, PGK and ZAR
Consumption of steel
Price of steel
Interest earned on cash
US dollar interest rates
and equivalents
Interest paid on fixed-rate
US dollar interest rates
borrowings
The time frame and manner in which we manage those
risks varies for each item based upon our assessment of
the risk and available alternatives for mitigating risk. For
these particular risks, we believe that derivatives are an
appropriate way of managing the risk.
We use derivatives as part of our risk management
program to mitigate variability associated with changing
market values related to the hedged item. Many of the
derivatives we use meet the hedge effectiveness criteria
and are designated in a hedge accounting relationship.
Certain derivatives are designated as either hedges
of the fair value of recognized assets or liabilities or of
firm commitments (“fair value hedges”) or hedges of
highly probable forecasted transactions (“cash flow
hedges”), collectively known as “accounting hedges”.
Hedges that are expected to be highly effective in
achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows
are assessed on an ongoing basis to determine that
they actually have been highly effective throughout
the financial reporting periods for which they were
designated. Some of the derivative instruments we
use are effective in achieving our risk management
objectives, but they do not meet the strict hedge
accounting criteria. These derivatives are considered
to be “non-hedge derivatives”. We also enter into
derivative instruments with the objective of realizing
trading gains to increase our reported net income.
These derivatives are also considered to be
“non-hedge derivatives”.
122
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 d) Summary of Derivatives at December 31, 2013
Notional amount by term to maturity
Accounting
classification by
notional amount
Within
1 year
2 to 3
years
4 to 5
years
Cash flow
hedge
Total
Fair value
hedge
Non-
hedge
Fair value
(USD)
US dollar interest rate contracts (US$ millions)
Total receive – float swap positions
Total receive – fixed swap positions
$ –
100
$ 43
–
$ 99
200
$ 142
300
$ 142
–
$ –
200
$ –
100
Currency contracts
A$:US$ contracts (A$ millions)
C$:US$ contracts (C$ millions)
CLP:US$ contracts (CLP millions)
PGK:US$ contracts (PGK millions)
ZAR:US$ contracts (ZAR millions)
183
295
81,750
32
908
455
120
78,000
–
440
–
–
–
–
–
638
415
159,750
32
1,348
585
415
88,970
–
171
Commodity contracts
Copper collar sell contracts (millions of pounds)
Diesel contracts (thousands of barrels)1
260
1,177
–
4,227
–
2,240
260
7,644
232
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
53
–
70,780
32
1,177
28
7,644
$ 2
5
(71)
(2)
(4)
(1)
(4)
12
4
1. Diesel commodity contracts represent a combination of WTI, BRENT, and BRENT/WTI spread swaps. These derivatives hedge physical supply contracts based on the
price of ULSD, WTB, MOPS and JET, respectively, plus a spread. WTI represents West Texas Intermediate, BRENT represents Brent Crude Oil, and MOPS represents
Mean of Platts Singapore.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
Asset derivatives
Liability derivatives
Balance
sheet
classification
Fair value
as at
Dec. 31,
2013
Fair value
as at
Dec. 31,
2012
Fair value
as at
Jan. 1,
2012
Balance
sheet
classification
Fair value
as at
Dec. 31,
2013
Fair value
as at
Dec. 31,
2012
Fair value
as at
Jan. 1,
2012
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
US dollar interest
rate contracts
Currency contracts
Commodity contracts
Total derivatives classified
as hedging instruments
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments
US dollar interest rate contracts
Currency contracts
Commodity contracts
Total derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
Total derivatives
Other assets
Other assets
Other assets
$ 6
–
7
$ 6
133
81
$ 7
629
312
Other liabilities
Other liabilities
Other liabilities
$
1
55
–
$ –
–
11
$ –
26
6
$ 13
$ 220
$ 948
$ 56
$ 11
$ 32
Other assets
Other assets
Other assets
$ 2
12
20
$ 34
$ 47
$
–
48
39
$
–
4
10
Other liabilities
Other liabilities
Other liabilities
$ 87
$ 14
$ 307
$ 962
$
–
39
11
$ 50
$ 106
$ –
9
9
$ 18
$ 29
$ –
26
6
$ 32
$ 64
123
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
As of December 31, 2013, we had 22 counterparties
to our derivative positions. We proactively manage our
exposure to individual counterparties in order to mitigate
both credit and liquidity risks. For those counterparties
with which we hold a net asset position (total balance
attributable to the counterparties is $19 million), six hold
greater than 10% of our mark-to-market asset position,
with the largest counterparty holding 30%. We have
15 counterparties with which we are in a net liability
position, for a total net liability of $78 million. On an
ongoing basis, we monitor our exposures and ensure
that none of the counterparties with which we hold
outstanding contracts has declared insolvency.
US Dollar Interest Rate Contracts
Fair Value Hedges
We have $200 million of pay-variable receive-fixed swap
positions outstanding that are used to hedge changes in
the fair value of a portion of our long-term fixed-rate
debt. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of
the swap contracts is recorded in interest expense. Gains
and losses from hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
current earnings, classified in the consolidated statement
of income as gains/losses) on non-hedge derivatives.
Cash Flow Hedges
During the year, ABG entered into pay-fixed receive-float
interest rate swaps to hedge the floating rate debt
associated with the Bulyanhulu plant expansion. These
contracts, designated as cash flow hedges, convert the
floating rate debt as it is drawn against the financing
agreement. At December 31, 2013, we had $142 million
in positions outstanding.
Currency Contracts
Cash Flow Hedges
During the year, currency contracts totaling A$ 65 million,
C$ 319 million, CLP 16 billion, and ZAR 171 million have
been designated against forecasted non-US dollar
denominated expenditures, some of which are hedges
which matured within the year. In total, we have
A$ 585 million, C$ 415 million, CLP 89 billion and
ZAR 171 million designated as cash flow hedges of our
anticipated operating, administrative and sustaining
capital spend. The outstanding contracts hedge the
variability of the US dollar amount of those expenditures
caused by changes in currency exchange rates over the
next five years. The effective portion of changes in fair
value of the currency contracts is recorded in OCI until
the forecasted expenditure impacts earnings. Gains and
losses from hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
current earnings classified in the consolidated statement
of income as gains (losses) on non-hedge derivatives.
During the year, we sold back and effectively closed
out approximately A$990 million of our Australian dollar
forward contracts as a loss mitigation strategy. No cash
settlement occurred and payments will net at maturity
(2013 – 2016). We crystallized losses of approximately
$25 million, which will be recognized in the consolidated
statement of income based on the original hedge
contract maturity dates. At December 31, 2013,
$19 million of these losses remain crystallized in OCI.
Including Australian dollar contracts closed out in the
previous year, $87 million of gains remain crystallized
in OCI at December 31, 2013.
During the year, we also unwound approximately
CLP 500 billion of our Chilean peso hedges. We realized
net cash proceeds of approximately $50 million with
$18 million being crystallized in OCI. Any unrealized
change and realized gain/losses on ineffective amounts
or time value have been recognized in the consolidated
statement of income as gains on non-hedge derivatives.
At December 31, 2013, $9 million of gains remains
crystallized in OCI.
Non-hedge Derivatives
We concluded that CLP 71 billion of derivatives contracts
do not meet the strict hedge effectiveness criteria. These
contracts represent an economic hedge of operating
and administrative expenses at various South American
locations, including operating mines and projects. Also,
ZAR 1,177 million represents an economic hedge of
ABG’s anticipated operating, capital and administrative
spending at various locations in Africa. Although not
qualifying as accounting hedges, the contracts provide
protection against the variability of CLP and ZAR to the
US dollar. The remaining non-hedge currency contracts
are used to mitigate the variability of the US dollar
amount of non-US dollar denominated exposures that do
not meet the strict hedge effectiveness criteria. Changes
in the fair value of the non-hedge currency contracts are
recorded in the consolidated statement of income as
gains (losses) on non-hedge derivatives.
124
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 During the year, we wrote AUD and CAD options
with no outstanding notional amount at December 31,
2013. As a result of these activities we earned $2 million
in premium income during the year, which is recognized
in the consolidated statement of income as gains on
non-hedge derivatives.
Commodity Contracts
Diesel/Propane/Electricity/Natural Gas
Non-hedge Derivatives
During the year, we entered into 5,400 thousand barrels
of WTI, 480 thousand barrels of sold Brent-WTI swaps,
and 144 thousand barrels of Brent to economically
hedge our exposure to forecasted fuel purchases for
expected consumption at our mines. In total, on a
combined basis we have 7,644 thousand barrels of WTI
and Brent swaps outstanding that economically hedge
our exposure to forecasted fuel purchases at our mines.
Metals Contracts
Cash Flow Hedges
During the year, we purchased 148 million pounds of
copper collar contracts to designate as hedges against
copper cathode sales at our Zaldívar mine for 2013.
These contracts contained purchased put and sold call
options with weighted average strike prices of $3.50/lb
and $4.25/lb, respectively. We also purchased 251 million
pounds of copper collars for 2014 which mature evenly
through 2014. These contracts contain purchased put
and sold call options with weighted average strike prices
of $3.00/lb and $3.75/lb, respectively. At December 31,
2013, 232 million pounds are classified as cash flow
hedges with the remainder serving as economic hedges
of our Lumwana mine. These contracts were designated
as cash flow hedges, with the effective portion of the
hedge recognized in OCI and the ineffective portion,
together with the changes in time value, recognized in
non-hedge derivative gains (losses). Provided that spot
copper price remains within the collar band, any
unrealized gain (loss) on the collar will be attributable
to time value.
During the year, we early terminated 65 million
ounces of silver hedges. We realized net cash proceeds
of approximately $190 million with $21 million remaining
crystallized in OCI to be recognized in revenue as the
exposure occurs. Any unrealized changes and realized
gains/losses on ineffective amounts or time value have
been recognized in the consolidated statements of
income as gains on non-hedge derivatives.
During the year, we recorded unrealized losses on
our copper collars and silver collars of $17 million and
$36 million, respectively, due to changes in time value.
This was included in current period earnings as gains on
non-hedge derivative activities. Gains and losses from
hedge ineffectiveness and time value of options, which
are generally excluded, are recognized in the consolidated
statement of income as gains on non-hedge derivatives.
Non-Hedge Derivatives
We enter into purchased and written contracts with the
primary objective of increasing the realized price on some
of our gold sales. During the year, we wrote gold put
and call options with an average outstanding notional of
16 thousand ounces. As a result of these activities, we
recorded $1 million in the consolidated statement of
income as gains on non-hedge derivatives. There are no
outstanding gold positions at December 31, 2013.
125
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Cash Flow Hedge Gains (Losses) in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”)
Commodity
price hedges
Gold/Silver1
Copper
Operating
costs
Fuel
Currency hedges
General and
administrative
costs
Interest rate
hedges
Capital
expenditures
Long-term
debt
Total
At January 1, 2012
Effective portion of change in
$ 44
$ 82
$ 29
$ 572
$ 19
$ 18
$ (31)
$ 733
fair value of hedging instruments
(34)
(45)
2
220
26
21
(3)
187
Transfers to earnings:
On recording hedged items in
earnings/PP&E1
Hedge ineffectiveness due to changes
in original forecasted transaction
At December 31, 2012
Effective portion of change in fair
value of hedging instruments
Transfers to earnings:
On recording hedged items in
earnings/PP&E1
Hedge ineffectiveness due to changes
in original forecasted transaction
At December 31, 2013
–
–
(46)
$ 18
(37)
(24)
(336)
(20)
(13)
$ 10
$ –
$ 7
$ 456
$ 26
$ (31)
$ 493
–
–
–
–
–
$ 25
55
57
(2)
(140)
(16)
(12)
(1)
(57)
(9)
(268)
(11)
(14)
3
–
(427)
–
2
3
–
(56)
(357)
(41)
–
–
5
–
–
$ –
$ (4)
$ 53
$ (2)
$ –
$ (26)
$ 39
Hedge gains/losses classified within
Gold/Silver
sales
Copper
sales
Cost of
sales
Cost of
sales
General and
administrative
costs
Property,
plant, and
equipment
Interest
expense
Total
Portion of hedge gain (loss)
expected to affect 2014 earnings2
$ (1)
$ –
$ (4)
$ 105
$ (2)
$ –
$
(5)
$ 93
1. Realized gains (losses) on qualifying currency hedges of capital expenditures are transferred from OCI to PP&E on settlement.
2. Based on the fair value of hedge contracts at December 31, 2013.
Cash Flow Hedge Gains (Losses) at December 31
Derivatives in cash flow
hedging relationships
Amount of gain
(loss) recognized
in OCI
2013
2012
Location of gain (loss)
transferred from OCI
into income/PP&E
(effective portion)
Amount of gain
(loss) transferred
from OCI into income
(effective portion)
2013
2012
Interest rate contracts
$ 2
$
(3) Finance income/finance costs
$
(3) $
(3)
Foreign exchange
contracts
(168)
267
General and
administrative costs
293
369
Commodity contracts
110
(77)
Revenue/cost of sales
67
61
Total
$ (56) $ 187
$ 357
$ 427
Location of gain (loss)
recognized in income
(ineffective portion and
amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in income
(ineffective portion and
amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)
Gain (loss) on non-
hedge derivatives
Gain (loss) on non-
hedge derivatives
Gain (loss) on non-
hedge derivatives
2013
2012
$ –
$
–
(18)
7
(7)
(95)
$ (25)
$ (88)
Fair Value Hedge Gains (Losses) at December 31
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships
Location of loss
recognized in income
on derivatives
Amount of loss
recognized in income
on derivatives
Interest rate contracts
Interest income/expense
2013
$ (2)
2012
$ (2)
126
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
e) Gains (Losses) on Non-hedge Derivatives
2013
For the years ended December 31
$ 1
104
(9)
12
(8)
1
$ 101
Commodity contracts
Gold
Silver
Copper
Fuel
Currency contracts
Interest rate contracts
Gains (losses) attributable to silver option
collar hedges1
Gains (losses) attributable to copper option
collar hedges1
Gains (losses) attributable to currency option
collar hedges1
Hedge ineffectiveness
2012
$ –
12
(5)
6
107
(1)
$ 119
f) Derivative Assets and Liabilities
At January 1
Derivatives cash (inflow) outflow
Operating activities
Financing activities
Early settlement of derivatives
Change in fair value of:
Non-hedge derivatives
Cash flow hedges:
Effective portion
Ineffective portion
Fair value hedges
Excluded from effectiveness changes
$ (36)
$ (48)
(17)
(46)
At December 31
(13)
41
$ (25)
$ 76
7
(1)
$ (88)
$ 31
Classification:
Other current assets
Other long-term assets
Other current liabilities
Other long-term obligations
1. Represents unrealized gains (losses) attributable to changes in time value of
the collars, which are excluded from the hedge effectiveness assessment.
25 Fair Value Measurements
2013
2012
$ 278
$ 898
(71)
(4)
(239)
(373)
3
(466)
101
119
(56)
(41)
(2)
(25)
187
–
(2)
(88)
$ (59)
$ 278
$ 37
10
(31)
(75)
$ 124
183
(10)
(19)
$ (59)
$ 278
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. The fair value hierarchy establishes
three levels to classify the inputs to valuation techniques
used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices in markets
that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, inputs other than quoted
prices that are observable for the asset or liability (for
example, interest rate and yield curves observable at
commonly quoted intervals, forward pricing curves used
to value currency and commodity contracts and volatility
measurements used to value option contracts), or inputs
that are derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data or other means. Level 3 inputs
are unobservable (supported by little or no market
activity). The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
a) Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Fair Value Measurements
At December 31, 2013
Cash and equivalents
Available-for-sale securities
Derivatives
Receivables from provisional copper and gold sales
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
$ 2,404
120
–
–
$ 2,524
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
$
–
–
(59)
246
$ 187
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
$ –
–
–
–
$ –
Aggregate
fair value
$ 2,404
120
(59)
246
$ 2,711
127
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Fair Value Measurements
At December 31, 2012 (restated)
Cash and equivalents
Available-for-sale securities
Derivatives
Receivables from provisional copper and gold sales
Fair Value Measurements
At January 1, 2012 (restated)
Cash and equivalents
Available-for-sale securities
Derivatives
Receivables from provisional copper and gold sales
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
$ 2,097
78
–
–
$ 2,175
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
$ 2,749
161
–
–
$ 2,910
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
$
–
–
278
261
$ 539
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
$
–
–
898
206
$ 1,104
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
$ –
–
–
–
$ –
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
$ –
–
–
–
$ –
Aggregate
fair value
$ 2,097
78
278
261
$ 2,714
Aggregate
fair value
$ 2,749
161
898
206
$ 4,014
b) Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities1
Financial assets
Other receivables
Available-for-sale securities2
Derivative assets
Financial liabilities
Debt3
Derivative liabilities
Other liabilities
At Dec. 31, 2013
At Dec. 31, 2012 (restated)
At Jan. 1, 2012 (restated)
Carrying
amount
Estimated
fair value
Carrying
amount
Estimated
fair value
Carrying
amount
Estimated
fair value
$
167
120
47
$
167
120
47
$
156
78
307
$
156
78
307
$
138
161
962
$
138
161
962
$
334
$
334
$
541
$
541
$ 1,261
$ 1,261
$ 13,080
106
355
$ 12,525
106
355
$ 13,943
29
323
$ 15,502
29
323
$ 13,369
64
202
$ 14,374
64
202
$ 13,541
$ 12,986
$ 14,295
$ 15,854
$ 13,635
$ 14,640
1. The fair values of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their carrying values due to their short-term nature.
2. Recorded at fair value. Quoted market prices are used to determine fair value.
3. Debt is generally recorded at amortized cost except for obligations that are designated in a fair-value hedge relationship, in which case the carrying amount is
adjusted for changes in fair value of the hedging instrument in periods when a hedge relationship exists. The fair value of debt is primarily determined using quoted
market prices. Balance includes both current and long-term portions of debt.
We do not offset financial assets with financial liabilities.
128
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
c) Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Other assets1
Property, plant and equipment2
Intangible assets3
Goodwill4
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
$ –
–
–
–
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
$ –
–
–
–
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
$ 305
4,674
65
2,624
Aggregate
fair value
$ 305
4,674
65
2,624
1. Other assets were written down by $139 million which was included in earnings this period, to their fair value of $305 million.
2. Property, plant and equipment were written down by $9,595 million which was included in earnings in this period, to their fair value less costs of disposal of
$4,674 million. Includes assets and liabilities classified as held for sale.
3. Intangible assets were written down by $112 million which was included in earnings in this period, to their fair value less costs of disposal of $65 million.
4. Goodwill was written down by $2,815 million which was included in earnings in this period.
Valuation Techniques
Cash Equivalents
The fair value of our cash equivalents is classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are
valued using quoted market prices in active markets. Our
cash equivalents are comprised of U.S. Treasury bills and
money market securities that are invested primarily in
U.S. Treasury bills.
Available-for-Sale Securities
The fair value of available-for-sale securities is determined
based on the closing price of each security at the balance
sheet date. The closing price is a quoted market price
obtained from the exchange that is the principal active
market for the particular security, and therefore available-
for-sale securities are classified within Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy.
Derivative Instruments
The fair value of derivative instruments is determined
using either present value techniques or option pricing
models that utilize a variety of inputs that are a
combination of quoted prices and market-corroborated
inputs. The fair value of all our derivative contracts
includes an adjustment for credit risk. For counterparties
in a net asset position, credit risk is based upon the
observed credit default swap spread for each particular
counterparty, as appropriate. For counterparties in a net
liability position, credit risk is based upon Barrick’s
observed credit default swap spread. The fair value of
US dollar interest rate and currency swap contracts is
determined by discounting contracted cash flows using
a discount rate derived from observed LIBOR and swap
rate curves and CDS rates. In the case of currency
contracts, we convert non-US dollar cash flows into
US dollars using an exchange rate derived from currency
swap curves and CDS rates. The fair value of commodity
forward contracts is determined by discounting
contractual cash flows using a discount rate derived from
observed LIBOR and swap rate curves and CDS rates.
Contractual cash flows are calculated using a forward
pricing curve derived from observed forward prices for
each commodity. Derivative instruments are classified
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Receivables from Provisional Copper and Gold Sales
The fair value of receivables arising from copper and gold
sales contracts that contain provisional pricing mechanisms
is determined using the appropriate quoted forward
price from the exchange that is the principal active
market for the particular metal. As such, these receivables,
which meet the definition of an embedded derivative,
are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Goodwill
and intangibles
The fair value of property, plant and equipment, goodwill
and intangibles is determined primarily using an income
approach based on unobservable cash flows and a
market multiples approach where applicable, and as a
result is classified within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy. Refer to note 20 for disclosure of inputs used
to develop these measures.
129
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
26 Provisions
a) Provisions
Environmental rehabilitation
(“PER”)
Post-retirement benefits
RSUs
Other
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 2,254
83
11
80
$ 2,589
125
26
72
$ 2,080
146
22
78
$ 2,428
$ 2,812
$ 2,326
b) Environmental Rehabilitation
At January 1
PERs acquired (divested) during the year
PERs arising (decreasing) in the year
Impact of revisions to expected
cash flows recorded in earnings
Settlements
Cash payments relating to
continuing operations
Cash payments relating to
discontinued operations
Settlement gains
Accretion
Assets held for sale
At December 31
Current portion (note 23)
2013
2012
$ 2,663
(164)
(145)
$ 2,159
(3)
466
91
40
(56)
(1)
(2)
69
(96)
(48)
(3)
(2)
54
–
$ 2,359
2,663
(105)
(74)
$ 2,254
$ 2,589
The eventual settlement of all PERs is expected to take
place between 2014 and 2054.
The PER has increased from third quarter 2013 by
$316 million primarily due to changes in cost estimates,
partially offset by changes in discount rates. For the
full year ended December 31, 2013, our PER balance
decreased by $304 million, primarily due to an increase
in the discount rate used to calculate the PER and due
to the divestiture of various sites as well as our oil and
gas business that occurred in 2013. The offset was
recorded as an increase in PP&E for our operations and
other expense at our closed sites. A 1% increase in the
discount rate would result in a decrease of PER by
$266 million and a 1% decrease in the discount rate
would result in an increase in PER by $332 million,
while holding the other assumptions constant.
27 Financial Risk Management
Our financial instruments are comprised of financial
liabilities and financial assets. Our principal financial
liabilities, other than derivatives, comprise accounts
payable and debt. The main purpose of these financial
instruments is to manage short-term cash flow and raise
funds for our capital expenditure program. Our principal
financial assets, other than derivative instruments, are
cash and equivalents and accounts receivable, which
arise directly from our operations. In the normal course
of business, we use derivative instruments to mitigate
exposure to various financial risks.
We manage our exposure to key financial risks in
accordance with our financial risk management policy.
The objective of the policy is to support the delivery
of our financial targets while protecting future financial
security. The main risks that could adversely affect
our financial assets, liabilities or future cash flows are
as follows:
a) Market risk, including commodity price risk, foreign
currency and interest rate risk;
b) Credit risk;
c) Liquidity risk; and
d) Capital risk management.
Management designs strategies for managing each of
these risks, which are summarized below. Our senior
management oversees the management of financial
risks. Our senior management ensures that our financial
risk-taking activities are governed by policies and
procedures and that financial risks are identified,
measured and managed in accordance with our policies
and our risk appetite. All derivative activities for
risk management purposes are carried out by the
appropriate functions.
a) Market Risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market factors,
such as commodity prices, foreign exchange rates or
interest rates, will affect the value of our financial
instruments. We manage market risk by either accepting
it or mitigating it through the use of derivatives and
other economic hedging strategies.
130
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Commodity Price Risk
Gold and Copper
We sell our gold and copper production in the world
market. The market prices of gold and copper are the
primary drivers of our profitability and ability to generate
both operating and free cash flow. All of our future
gold production is unhedged in order to provide our
shareholders with full exposure to changes in the market
gold price. Our corporate treasury function implements
hedging strategies on an opportunistic basis to protect
us from downside price risk on our copper production.
We have put in place floor protection on approximately
half of our expected copper production for 2014 at an
average floor price of $3.00 per pound. In addition, we
have sold an equal amount of call options at an average
price of $3.75 per pound. Our remaining copper
production is subject to market prices.
Silver
During the year, we terminated all of our silver hedges
and as a result, changes in the expected long-term price
of silver have a significant impact on the estimated fair
value of the Pascua-Lama project.
Fuel
On average we consume approximately 5 million barrels
of diesel fuel annually across all our mines. Diesel fuel
is refined from crude oil and is therefore subject to the
same price volatility affecting crude oil prices. Therefore,
volatility in crude oil prices has a significant direct and
indirect impact on our production costs. To mitigate this
volatility, we employ a strategy of using financial
contracts to hedge our exposure to oil prices.
The table below summarizes the impact of changes
in the market price on gold, copper, silver and oil. The
impact is expressed in terms of the resulting change
in our net earnings for the year or, where applicable, the
change in equity. The sensitivities are based on the
assumption that the market price changes by 10% with
all other variables held constant.
Impact of a 10% change from year-end price
Effect on
earnings
Effect on
equity
Products
2013
2012
2013
2012
10% increase in gold price
10% increase in copper price
10% increase in silver price1
10% increase in oil price
$ 619
128
1
26
$ 799
103
(33)
9
$ 619
128
1
(21)
$ 799
115
(37)
10
Products
2013
2012
2013
2012
Effect on
earnings
Effect on
equity
10% decrease in gold price
10% decrease in copper price
10% decrease in silver price1
10% decrease in oil price
$ (619) $ (799) $ (619) $ (799)
(9)
52
(9)
(27)
(1)
(25)
(50)
(1)
21
(67)
18
(9)
1. Represents unrealized gains (losses) attributable to changes in fair value of
the silver collars.
Foreign Currency Risk
The functional and reporting currency for our gold and
copper segments and Pascua-Lama is the US dollar and
we report our results using the US dollar. The majority of
our operating and capital expenditures are denominated
and settled in US dollars. We have exposure to the
Australian dollar and Canadian dollar through a
combination of mine operating costs and corporate
administration costs; and to the Papua New Guinea kina,
Peruvian sol, Chilean peso, Argentinean peso, Dominican
Republic peso and Zambian kwacha through mine
operating costs. Consequently, fluctuations in the US
dollar exchange rate against these currencies increase the
volatility of cost of sales, corporate administration costs
and overall net earnings, when translated into US dollars.
To mitigate these inherent risks and provide greater
certainty over our costs, we have foreign currency
hedges in place for some of our Australian and Canadian
dollar exposures as well as a portion of our Chilean peso
exposures. In second quarter 2013, the Company
unwound approximately CLP 500 billion of our Chilean
peso hedges. In third quarter 2012, the Company
unwound approximately $2.6 billion of our Australian
dollar hedges and, in 2013, the Company unwound a
further $990 million of our Australian dollar forward
contracts. As a result, we now have greater exposure to
fluctuations in the value of the Chilean peso and
Australian dollar compared to the US dollar.
131
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
The following table shows gains (losses) associated with
a 10% change in exchange rate of the Australian dollar:
Impact of a 10% change in exchange rate of Australian dollar
Average
exchange rate
Effect on
net earnings
Effect on
equity
2013 2012
2013 2012
2013 2012
10% strengthening $ 0.89 $ 1.03
0.89 1.03
10% weakening
$ (91) $ (26)
26
91
$ (91) $ (26)
91
26
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk refers to the risk that the value of a
financial instrument or cash flows associated with the
instruments will fluctuate due to changes in market
interest rates. Currently, our interest rate exposure
mainly relates to interest receipts on our cash balances
($2.4 billion at the end of the year); the mark-to-market
value of derivative instruments; the fair value and
ongoing payments under US dollar interest-rate swaps;
and to the interest payments on our variable-rate debt
($1.2 billion at December 31, 2013).
The following table shows the approximate interest
rate sensitivities of our financial assets and liabilities as at
December 31:
Impact of a 1% change in interest rate
Effect on
net earnings
Effect on
equity
2013
2012
2013
2012
$ 6
(6)
$ (2)
2
$ 6
(6)
$ (2)
2
1% increase
1% decrease
b) Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to
fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of a
financial instrument. Credit risk arises from cash and
equivalents, trade and other receivables as well as
derivative assets. For cash and equivalents and trade and
other receivables, credit risk exposure equals the carrying
amount on the balance sheet, net of any overdraft
positions. To mitigate our inherent exposure to credit risk
we maintain policies to limit the concentration of credit
risk, review counterparty creditworthiness on a monthly
basis, and ensure liquidity of available funds. We also
invest our cash and equivalents in highly rated financial
institutions, primarily within the United States and other
investment grade countries1. Furthermore, we sell
our gold and copper production into the world market
and to private customers with strong credit ratings.
Historically customer defaults have not had a significant
impact on our operating results or financial position.
For derivatives with a positive fair value, we are
exposed to credit risk equal to the carrying value. When
the fair value of a derivative is negative, we assume
no credit risk. We mitigate credit risk on derivatives by:
Entering into derivatives with high credit-quality
counterparties;
Limiting the amount of net exposure with each
counterparty; and
Monitoring the financial condition of counterparties
on a regular basis.
The company’s maximum exposure to credit risk at
the reporting date is the carrying value of each of the
financial assets disclosed as follows:
($ millions)
Cash and equivalents
Accounts receivable
Net derivative assets
by counterparty
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
$ 2,404
385
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
(restated)
$ 2,097
449
$ 2,749
426
19
282
901
$ 2,808
$ 2,828
$ 4,076
1. Investment grade countries include Canada, Chile, Australia, and Peru.
Investment grade countries are defined as being rated BBB- or higher by S&P.
c) Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of loss from not having access to
sufficient funds to meet both expected and unexpected
cash demands. We manage our exposure to liquidity risk
by maintaining cash reserves, access to undrawn credit
facilities and access to public debt markets, by staggering
the maturities of outstanding debt instruments to
mitigate refinancing risk and by monitoring of forecast
and actual cash flows. Details of the undrawn credit
facility are included in Note 24.
132
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Our capital structure comprises a mix of debt and
shareholders’ equity. As at December 31, 2013, our total
debt was $13.1 billion (debt net of cash and equivalents
was $10.7 billion) compared to total debt as at
December 31, 2012 of $13.9 billion (debt net of cash
and equivalents was $11.8 billion) and at January 1,
2012 of $13.4 billion (debt net of cash and equivalents
was $10.6 billion).
In 2013, we made a number of changes to our
capital structure. In first quarter 2013, we drew
$2.0 billion on our $4.0 billion revolving credit facility
(“2012 Credit Facility”), using the proceeds to repay
$1.2 billion on our $1.45 billion credit facility, which
expired in April 2013. In second quarter 2013, we issued
$3.0 billion of debt, using $2.0 billion of the net
proceeds to repay the outstanding balance on the 2012
Credit Facility. In fourth quarter 2013, we issued new
equity for net proceeds of $2.9 billion, using $2.6 billion
of those proceeds to redeem outstanding debt with
near-term maturities. The net effect of these transactions
was to repay all amounts outstanding under our credit
facilities and significantly reduce other near term debt
maturities with approximately $300 million maturing
in the next two years and a total of approximately
$1 billion due in the next 4 years (refer to note 24 for
further details). The $4.0 billion credit facility was fully
undrawn at year end and the termination date has been
extended by one year such that the facility now expires
in January 2019.
As part of our disciplined capital allocation strategy,
we are constantly evaluating our capital expenditures
and making reductions where the risk-adjusted returns
do not justify the investment. Since the beginning of
2013, we have also made divestments of non-core assets
and assets that do not meet our investment criteria,
such as the sale of our oil & gas business and certain
of our Australian assets for total cash proceeds of
approximately $565 million and we are anticipating
receiving aggregate cash proceeds of approximately
$153 million in connection with our announced sales of
Kanowna and Marigold. In July 2013, the Company’s
Board of Directors authorized reducing the quarterly
dividend to $0.05 per share as a further prudent step
to improve liquidity (The declaration and payment of
dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors
and will depend on the Company’s financial results,
cash requirements, future prospects and other factors
deemed relevant by the Board).
Our primary source of liquidity is our operating cash
flow. Other options to enhance liquidity include drawing
the $4.0 billion available under our 2012 Credit Facility
(subject to compliance with covenants and the making of
certain representations and warranties, this facility is
available for drawdown as a source of financing), further
asset sales and issuances of debt or equity securities in
the public markets or to private investors, which could
be undertaken for liquidity enhancement and/or in
connection with establishing a strategic partnership.
Many factors, including, but not limited to, general
market conditions and then prevailing metals prices
could impact our ability to issue securities on acceptable
terms, as could our credit ratings. Moody’s and S&P rate
our long-term debt Baa2 and BBB, respectively. Changes
in our ratings could affect the trading prices of our
securities and our cost of capital. If we were to borrow
under our 2012 Credit Facility, the applicable interest
rate on the amounts borrowed would be based, in part,
on our credit ratings at the time. The key financial
covenant in the 2012 Credit Facility (undrawn as at
December 31, 2013) requires Barrick to maintain a
consolidated tangible net worth (“CTNW”) of at least
$3.0 billion (Barrick’s CTNW was $7.1 billion as at
December 31, 2013).
The following table outlines the expected maturity of
our significant financial assets and liabilities into relevant
maturity groupings based on the remaining period from
the balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date.
As the amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual
undiscounted cash flows, these balances may not agree
with the amounts disclosed in the balance sheet.
133
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 As at December 31, 2013
(in $ millions)
Cash and equivalents
Accounts receivable
Derivative assets
Trade and other payables
Debt
Derivative liabilities
Other liabilities
As at December 31, 2012 (restated)
(in $ millions)
Cash and equivalents
Accounts receivable
Derivative assets
Trade and other payables
Debt
Derivative liabilities
Other liabilities
As at January 1, 2012 (restated)
(in $ millions)
Cash and equivalents
Accounts receivable
Derivative assets
Trade and other payables
Debt
Derivative liabilities
Other liabilities
Less than 1 year
1 to 3 years
3 to 5 years Over 5 years
Total
$ 2,404
385
34
2,165
179
32
111
$
–
–
7
–
1,002
72
145
$
–
–
5
–
1,068
2
41
$
–
–
1
–
10,958
–
58
$ 2,404
385
47
2,165
13,207
106
355
Less than 1 year
1 to 3 years
3 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total
$ 2,097
449
124
2,267
1,848
10
117
$
–
–
119
–
1,401
13
123
$
–
–
51
–
1,727
6
36
$
–
–
13
–
9,080
–
47
$ 2,097
449
307
2,267
14,056
29
323
Less than 1 year
1 to 3 years
3 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total
$ 2,749
426
504
2,085
196
22
12
$
–
–
369
–
3,257
30
140
$
–
–
56
–
2,820
12
18
$
–
–
33
–
7,161
–
32
$ 2,749
426
962
2,085
13,434
64
202
d) Capital Risk Management
Our objective when managing capital is to provide value
for shareholders by maintaining an optimal short-term
and long-term capital structure in order to reduce the
overall cost of capital while preserving our ability to
continue as a going concern. Our capital management
objectives are to safeguard our ability to support our
operating requirements on an ongoing basis, continue
the development and exploration of our mineral
properties and support any expansion plans. Our
objectives are also to ensure that we maintain a strong
balance sheet and optimize the use of debt and equity to
support our business and provide financial flexibility in
order to maximize shareholder value. We define capital
as total debt less cash and equivalents and it is managed
by management subject to approved policies and limits
by the Board of Directors. We have no significant
financial covenants or capital requirements with our
lenders or other parties other than what is discussed
under liquidity risk section of note 27.
28 Other Non-Current Liabilities
($ millions)
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
Deposit on silver sale agreement
Derivative liabilities (note 24f)
Provision for supply contract
restructuring costs
Provision for offsite remediation
Other
$ 646
75
13
62
180
$ 620
19
20
62
129
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 453
42
25
61
108
$ 976
$ 850
$ 689
Silver Sale Agreement
On September 22, 2009, we entered into an agreement
with Silver Wheaton Corp. (“Silver Wheaton”) to sell
the amount equal to 25% of the life of mine silver
production from the Pascua-Lama project and 100% of
silver production from the Lagunas Norte, Pierina and
Veladero mines (“South American mines”) until the end
of 2013. In return, we were entitled to an upfront cash
payment of $625 million payable over three years from
the date of the agreement, as well as ongoing payments
134
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
in cash of the lesser of $3.90 (subject to an annual
inflation adjustment of 1% starting three years after
project completion at Pascua-Lama) and the prevailing
market price for each ounce of silver delivered under
the agreement.
During 2012 we received the final cash payment
from the agreement of $137.5 million. An imputed
interest expense is being recorded on the liability at the
rate implicit in the agreement. The liability plus imputed
interest will be amortized based on the difference
between the effective contract price for silver and the
amount of the ongoing cash payment per ounce of
silver delivered under the agreement.
We had provided Silver Wheaton with a completion
guarantee, requiring us to complete Pascua-Lama to
at least 75% design capacity by December 31, 2015.
During 2014 and 2015, Silver Wheaton will be entitled
to the silver production from the South American mines
to the extent of any production shortfall at Pascua-Lama,
until we satisfy the completion guarantee. Per the
terms of the original silver purchase agreement, if the
requirements of the completion guarantee have not been
satisfied by December 31, 2015, the agreement may be
terminated by Silver Wheaton, in which case Silver
Wheaton will be entitled to the return of the upfront
cash consideration paid less a credit for silver delivered
up to the date of that event.
In 2013, Silver Wheaton agreed to extend the
completion date for Pascua-Lama to December 31,
2017 and will continue to receive silver production from
the South American mines until December 31, 2016.
At December 31, 2013, the cash obligation was
$365 million.
29 Deferred Income Taxes
Recognition and Measurement
We record deferred income tax assets and liabilities
where temporary differences exist between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities in our balance sheet and
their tax bases. The measurement and recognition of
deferred income tax assets and liabilities takes into
account: substantively enacted rates that will apply when
temporary differences reverse; interpretations of relevant
tax legislation; estimates of the tax bases of assets and
liabilities; and the deductibility of expenditures for
income tax purposes. In addition the measurement and
recognition of deferred tax assets takes into account tax
planning strategies. We recognize the effect of changes
in our assessment of these estimates and factors when
they occur. Changes in deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are allocated between net income, other
comprehensive income, and goodwill based on the
source of the change.
Current income taxes of $47 million have been
provided on the undistributed earnings of certain foreign
subsidiaries. Deferred income taxes have not been
provided on the undistributed earnings of all other
foreign subsidiaries for which we are able to control the
timing of the remittance, and it is probable that there
will be no remittance in the foreseeable future. These
undistributed earnings amounted to $7,543 million as
at December 31, 2013.
Sources of Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
(restated)
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
(restated)
$
251
$ 430
$ 624
9
646
4
–
33
10
65
44
724
46
34
72
–
41
165
683
26
16
45
–
41
Deferred tax assets
Tax loss carry forwards
Alternative minimum tax
(“AMT”) credits
Environmental rehabilitation
Property, plant and equipment
Post-retirement benefit obligations
Accrued interest payable
Derivative instruments
Other
Deferred tax liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
Derivative instruments
Inventory
Classification:
Non-current assets
Non-current liabilities
$ 1,018
$ 1,391
$ 1,600
(2,367)
–
(408)
(3,348)
(35)
(239)
(5,067)
(138)
(217)
$ (1,757)
$ (2,231)
$ (3,822)
$
501
(2,258)
$ 437
(2,668)
$ 409
(4,231)
$ (1,757)
$ (2,231)
$ (3,822)
The deferred tax asset of $501 million includes
$467 million expected to be realized in more than
one year. The deferred tax liability of $2,258 million
includes $2,253 million expected to be realized in
more than one year.
135
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Levels of future income are mainly affected by: market
gold, copper and silver prices; forecasted future costs
and expenses to produce gold and copper reserves;
quantities of proven and probable gold and copper
reserves; market interest rates; and foreign currency
exchange rates. If these factors or other circumstances
change, we record an adjustment to the recognition
of deferred assets to reflect our latest assessment of the
amount of deferred tax assets that is probable will
be realized.
A deferred income tax asset totaling $322 million
has been recorded in Canada. This deferred tax asset
primarily arose due to mark-to-market losses realized for
acquired Placer Dome derivative instruments recognized
on the acquisition in 2006. Projections of various sources
of income support the conclusion that the realizability of
this deferred tax asset is probable and consequently, we
have fully recognized this deferred tax asset.
Deferred Tax Assets Not Recognized
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
Australia and Papua New Guinea $
Canada
US
Chile
Argentina
Barbados
Tanzania
Zambia
Other
456
139
50
471
928
71
107
43
17
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
$ 181
88
2
3
–
73
43
48
12
As at
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 122
76
–
–
35
73
31
–
23
$ 2,282
$ 450
$ 360
Deferred Tax Assets Not Recognized relate to: non-
capital loss carry forwards of $334 million (2012:
$271 million and January 1, 2012 $170 million), capital
loss carry forwards with no expiry date of $200 million
(2012: $126 million and January 1, 2012: $120 million),
US AMT credits of $48 million (2012: nil and January 1,
2012 $nil) and other deductible temporary differences
with no expiry date of $1,700 million (2012: $53 million
and January 1, 2012 $70 million).
Expiry Dates of Tax Losses and AMT Credits
No
expiry
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018+ date
Total
Non-capital
tax losses1
Canada
Dominican
Republic
Barbados
Chile
Tanzania
Zambia
Other
$ 2 $ 5 $
– $
– $ 979 $
– $ 986
–
–
–
–
–
–
– 170
–
–
–
– 620 148 5,909
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
789
170
– 6,677
282
156
789
267
– 282
– 156
–
– 267
$ 2 $ 5 $ 620 $ 148 $ 7,677 $ 875 $ 9,327
AMT credits2
$ 58 $
58
1. Represents the gross amount of tax loss carry forwards translated at closing
exchange rates at December 31, 2013.
2. Represents the amounts deductible against future taxes payable in years
when taxes payable exceed “minimum tax” as defined by United States
tax legislation.
The non-capital tax losses include $7,726 million of
losses which are not recognized in deferred tax assets.
Of these, $2 million expire in 2014, $5 million expire
in 2015, $620 million expire in 2016, $148 million expire
in 2017, $6,262 million expire in 2018 or later, and
$689 million have no expiry date.
The AMT credits include $48 million which are not
recognized in deferred tax assets.
Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets
We recognize deferred tax assets taking into account
the effects of local tax law. Deferred tax assets are fully
recognized when we conclude that sufficient positive
evidence exists to demonstrate that it is probable that
a deferred tax asset will be realized. The main factors
considered are:
Historic and expected future levels of taxable income;
Tax plans that affect whether tax assets can be
realized; and
The nature, amount and expected timing of reversal
of taxable temporary differences.
136
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Source of Changes in Deferred Tax Balances
Tax Years Still Under Examination
2013
2012
(restated)
$ 938
(78)
(179)
(35)
(169)
45
(48)
$ 1,739
41
(194)
(121)
(22)
103
45
$ 474
$ 1,591
Canada
United States
Dominican Republic
Peru
Chile
Argentina
Australia
Papua New Guinea
Saudi Arabia
Tanzania
Zambia
30 Capital Stock
2009–2013
2013
2010–2013
2009, 2011, 2012, 2013
2010–2013
2006–2013
All years open
2004–2013
2007–2013
All years open
2010–2013
For the years ended December 31
Temporary differences
Property, plant and equipment
Environmental rehabilitation
Tax loss carry forwards
AMT credits
Inventory
Derivatives
Other
Intraperiod allocation to:
Loss from continuing operations
before income taxes
Loss from discontinued operations
Barrick Energy disposition
Acquisition of Aviva Corporation
OCI
Issuance of share capital
Other
Income Tax Related Contingent Liabilities
At January 1
Additions based on tax positions related
to the current year
Additions based on tax positions related
to prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Reduction related to discontinued operations
$ 471
13
(91)
–
56
24
1
$ 1,457
62
–
(6)
79
–
(1)
$ 474
$ 1,591
2013
2012
$ 64
$
64
1
–
(2)
(12)
1
9
(10)
–
At December 311
$ 51
$
64
1. If reversed, the total amount of $51 million would be recognized as a benefit
to income taxes on the income statement, and therefore would impact the
reported effective tax rate.
We anticipate the amount of income tax related
contingent liabilities to decrease within 12 months of
the reporting date by approximately $2 million to
$3 million, related primarily to the expected settlement
of income tax and mining tax assessments.
We further anticipate that it is reasonably possible
for the amount of income tax related contingent
liabilities to decrease within 12 months of the reporting
date by approximately $46 million through a potential
settlement with tax authorities that may result in a
reduction of available tax pools.
Authorized Capital Stock
Our authorized capital stock includes an unlimited
number of common shares (issued 1,164,652,426
common shares); an unlimited number of first preferred
shares issuable in series (the first series is designated as
the “First Preferred Shares, Series A” and consists of
10,000,000 First preferred shares (issued nil); the second
series is designated as the “First Preference Shares,
Series B” and consists of 10,000,000 first preferred
shares (issued nil); and the third series is designated as
the “First Preferred Shares, Series C Special Voting
Share” and consists of 1 Special Voting Share (issued
nil)); and an unlimited number of second preferred
shares issuable in series (the first series is designated as
the “Second Preferred Shares, Series A” and consists
of 15,000,000 second preferred shares (issued nil). Our
common shares have no par value.
Common Stock offering
On November 14, 2013, we issued 163.5 million shares
of Barrick at a price of $18.35, for net proceeds of
$2,910 million.
Dividends
In 2013, we declared and paid dividends in US dollars
totaling $0.44 per share, $508 million (2012: $0.75 per
share, $750 million).
137
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
31 Non-Controlling Interests
a) Non-Controlling Interests Continuity
NCI in subsidiary
At January 1, 2012 (restated)
Share of income (loss)
Cash contributed
Decrease of non-controlling interest2
At December 31, 2012 (restated)
Share of loss
Cash contributed
Decrease in non-controlling interest2
At December 31, 2013
Pueblo Viejo
ABG1
Cerro Casale
Total
40%
26.1%
25%
$ 937
(19)
487
–
$ 1,405
(21)
48
–
$ 1,432
$ 752
16
–
(21)
$ 747
(211)
–
(14)
$ 522
$ 502
(8)
18
–
$ 512
(5)
7
–
$ 514
$ 2,191
(11)
505
(21)
$ 2,664
(237)
55
(14)
$ 2,468
1. The balance includes the non-controlling interest of 30% in our Tulawaka mine.
2. Represents dividends received from African Barrick Gold.
b) Summarized Financial Information on Subsidiaries with Material Non-Controlling Interests
Summarized Balance Sheets
Pueblo Viejo
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
Current assets
Non-current assets
$ 473
5,252
$ 226
4,817
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 109
3,657
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
$ 675
1,624
ABG
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
Cerro Casale
Jan. 1,
2012
As at
Dec. 31,
2013
As at
Dec. 31,
2012
Jan. 1,
2012
$ 837
2,597
$ 968
2,396
5
$
2,040
$
9
1,956
$
16
1,839
Total assets
$ 5,725
$ 5,043
$ 3,766
$ 2,299
$ 3,434
$ 3,364
$ 2,045
$ 1,965
$ 1,855
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
$ 1,487
744
$ 1,535
1,022
$ 925
980
$ 152
322
$ 160
383
$ 136
331
$ 433
526
$
32
524
$
79
523
$ 2,231
$ 2,557
$ 1,905
$ 474
$ 543
$ 467
$ 959
$ 556
$ 602
Summarized Statements of Income
For the years ended December 31
Revenue
Income (loss) from continuing operations
after tax
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income (loss)
Dividends paid to NCI
Summarized Statements of Cash Flows
Pueblo Viejo
ABG
Cerro Casale
2013
$ 979
210
–
$ 210
$
–
2012
$
–
(47)
–
$ (47)
$
–
2013
2012
$ 936
$ 1,081
(793)
2
$ (791)
$
55
11
–
11
70
$
$
2013
$
–
(20)
–
$ (20)
$
–
2012
$
–
(37)
–
$ (37)
$
–
Pueblo Viejo
ABG
Cerro Casale
For the years ended December 31
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
2013
$ 190
(259)
96
2012
$ 458
(920)
486
2013
$ 172
(375)
84
2012
$ 218
(327)
(74)
2013
$ 11
(21)
8
2012
$ 23
(51)
18
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
138
$ 27
$ 24
$ (119)
$ (183)
$ (2)
$ (10)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Under the terms of Pueblo Viejo’s project financing
agreement described in note 24b, Pueblo Viejo
Dominicana Corporation is prohibited from making cash
payments to Barrick and Goldcorp in the form of
dividends or certain shareholder loan interest and
principal payments until Pueblo Viejo achieves specified
requirements, including requirements relating to
operational, social, and environmental matters.
The project financing agreement contains covenants
which limit certain activities by Pueblo Viejo Dominicana,
including Pueblo Viejo’s ability to sell assets and incur
debt. Furthermore, Pueblo Viejo’s material tangible and
intangible assets, including the proceeds from metal
sales, are segregated and pledged for the benefit of the
project lenders, thus restricting our access to those assets
and our ability to use those assets to settle our liabilities
to third parties.
33 Stock-Based Compensation
a) Stock Options
Under Barrick’s stock option plan, certain officers and key
employees of the Corporation may purchase common
shares at an exercise price that is equal to the closing
share price on the day before the grant of the option.
The grant date is the date when the details of the award,
including the number of options granted by individual
and the exercise price, are approved. Stock options vest
evenly over four years, beginning in the year after
granting. Options granted in July 2004 and prior are
exercisable over 10 years, whereas options granted since
December 2004 are exercisable over seven years.
At December 31, 2013, 6.5 million (2012: 6.9 million)
common shares were available for granting options.
Employee Stock Option Activity (Number of Shares in Millions)
32 Remuneration of Key Management Personnel
Key management personnel include the members of
the Board of Directors and the Senior leadership team.
Compensation for key management personnel (including
Directors) was as follows:
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
Salaries and short-term employee benefits1
Post-employment benefits2
Termination Benefits
Share-based payments and other3
$ 22
3
7
13
$ 45
$ 39
3
18
13
$ 73
1. Includes annual salary and annual short-term incentives/other bonuses
earned in the year.
2. Represents company contributions to retirement savings plans.
3. Relates to stock option, RSU, and PRSU grants and other compensation.
Compensation expense for stock options was
$8 million in 2013 (2012: $16 million), and is presented
as a component of corporate administration and
operating segment administration, consistent with the
classification of other elements of compensation expense
for those employees who had stock options. The
recognition of compensation expense for stock options
reduced earnings per share for 2013 by $0.01 per share
(2012: $0.02 per share).
Total intrinsic value relating to options exercised in
2013 was $nil million (2012: $8 million).
C$ options
At January 1
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled/expired
At December 31
US$ options
At January 1
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Cancelled/expired
At December 31
2013
2012
Shares Average price
Shares
Average price
0.6
0.1
–
(0.6)
0.1
6.3
1.1
–
(0.5)
(0.5)
6.4
$ 28
18
–
28
$ 19
$ 42
32
–
32
42
$ 41
1.1
–
(0.4)
(0.1)
0.6
5.8
1.1
(0.2)
(0.2)
(0.2)
6.3
$ 27
–
24
28
$ 28
$ 41
44
30
41
46
$ 42
139
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Stock Options Outstanding (Number of Shares in Millions)
Range of exercise prices
C$ options
$ 18 – $ 28
US$ options
$ 20 – $ 27
$ 28 – $ 41
$ 42 – $ 55
Outstanding
Exercisable
Shares
Average
price
Average
life (years)
Intrinsic
value1
($ millions)
Shares
Average
price
Intrinsic
value1
($ millions)
0.1
0.1
0.6
2.3
3.5
6.4
$ 19
$ 19
$ 26
35
47
$ 41
6.3
6.3
1.8
4.2
3.5
3.6
$
$
$
–
–
(5)
(40)
(106)
$ (151)
–
–
0.6
1.0
2.6
4.2
$ –
$ –
$ 26
39
46
$
$
$
–
–
(5)
(22)
(74)
$ 42
$ (101)
1. Based on the closing market share price on December 31, 2013 of C$ $18.71 and US$ $17.63.
Option Information
(per share and per option amounts in dollars)
Valuation assumptions
Expected term (years)
Expected volatility2
Expected dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate2
Options granted (in millions)
Weighted average fair value per option
Dec. 31,
2013
Dec. 31,
2012
Jan. 1,
2012
Lattice1,2
5.5
30%–35%
2.02%
0.10%–1.91%
Lattice1,2
5.3
33%–38%
1.22%
0.04%–2.04%
Lattice1,2
5.3
33%–38%
1.22%
0.04%–2.04%
1.2
$ 7
1.1
$ 12
0.5
$ 14
1. Different assumptions were used for the multiple stock option grants during the year.
2. The volatility and risk-free interest rate assumptions varied over the expected term of these stock option grants.
The expected volatility assumptions have been developed
taking into consideration both historical and implied
volatility of our US dollar share price. Forfeitures have
also been factored in based on historical forfeiture rates.
The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life
of the option is based on the US Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of the grant.
The expected term assumption is derived from the
option valuation model and is in part based on historical
data regarding the exercise behavior of option holders
based on multiple share-price paths. The Lattice model
also takes into consideration employee turnover and
voluntary exercise patterns of option holders.
As at December 31, 2013, there was $8 million
(2012: $11 million) of total unrecognized compensation
cost relating to unvested stock options. We expect to
recognize this cost over a weighted average period of
1 year (2012: 2 years).
b) Restricted Share Units (RSUs) and
Deferred Share Units (DSUs)
Under our RSU plan, selected employees are granted
RSUs where each RSU has a value equal to one Barrick
common share. RSUs vest at the end of a two-and-a-
half-year period and are settled in cash on the two-and-
a-half-year anniversary of the grant date. Additional
RSUs are credited to reflect dividends paid on Barrick
common shares over the vesting period.
Compensation expense for RSUs incorporates an
expected forfeiture rate. The expected forfeiture rate is
estimated based on historical forfeiture rates and
expectations of future forfeiture rates. We make
adjustments if the actual forfeiture rate differs from the
expected rate. At December 31, 2013, the weighted
average remaining contractual life of RSUs was
1.17 years (2012: 1.09 years).
140
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Compensation expense for RSUs was a $1 million
reversal in 2013 (2012: $29 million) and is presented as
a component of corporate administration and operating
segment administration, consistent with the classification
of other elements of compensation expense for those
employees who had RSUs.
Under our DSU plan, Directors must receive a
specified portion of their basic annual retainer in the
form of DSUs, with the option to elect to receive 100%
of such retainer in DSUs. Each DSU has the same value as
one Barrick common share. DSUs must be retained until
the Director leaves the Board, at which time the cash
value of the DSUs will be paid out. Additional DSUs are
credited to reflect dividends paid on Barrick common
shares. DSUs are recorded at fair value on the grant date
and are adjusted for changes in fair value. The fair value
of amounts granted each period together with changes
in fair value are expensed.
DSU and RSU Activity
At January 1, 2012
Settled for cash
Forfeited
Granted
Credits for dividends
Change in value
At December 31, 2012
Settled for cash
Forfeited
Granted
Credits for dividends
Change in value
DSUs
(thousands)
Fair
value
RSUs
($ millions) (thousands)
Fair
value
($ millions)
187
(23)
–
43
–
–
207
(72)
–
66
–
–
$ 8.4 2,815 $ 49.2
(28.9)
(708)
(0.8)
(2.4)
(57)
–
16.0
387
1.7
2.1
52
–
18.1
–
(2.3)
$ 7.0 2,489 $ 54.1
(19.2)
(803)
(1.2)
(15.8)
(764)
–
58.7
1.3 1,847
1.8
81
(49.8)
–
–
(2.4)
At December 31, 2013
201
$ 4.7 2,850 $ 29.8
c) Performance Restricted Share Units (PRSUs)
In 2008, Barrick launched a PRSU plan. Under this plan,
selected employees are granted PRSUs, where each
PRSU has a value equal to one Barrick common share.
At December 31, 2013, 598 thousand units were
outstanding (2012: 185 thousand units).
d) Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)
In 2008, Barrick launched an Employee Share Purchase
Plan. This plan enables Barrick employees to purchase
Company shares through payroll deduction. During
2013, Barrick contributed and expensed $0.8 million
to this plan (2012: $0.8 million).
e) ABG Stock Options
African Barrick Gold has a stock option plan for its
directors and selected employees. The exercise price
of the granted options is determined by the ABG
Remuneration Committee before the grant of an option
provided that this price cannot be less than the average
of the middle-market quotation of ABG’s shares (as
derived from the London Stock Exchange Daily Official
List) for the three dealing days immediately preceding
the date of grant. All options outstanding at the end
of the year expire in 2017 and 2020. There were
0.7 million ABG options granted which were exercisable
at December 31, 2013. Stock option expense of
$0.5 million (2012: $1.5 million) is included as a
component of operating segment administration.
34 Post-Retirement Benefits
Barrick operates various post-employment plans,
including both defined benefit and defined contribution
pension plans and other post-retirement plans. The
table below outlines where the Company’s post-
employment amounts and activity are included in
the financial statements:
For the years ended December 31
Balance sheet obligations for:
Defined pension benefits
Other post-retirement benefits
Liability in the balance sheet
Income statement charge included
income statement for:
Defined pension benefits
Other post-retirement benefits
Measurements for:
Defined pension benefits
Other post-retirement benefits
2013
$ 77
6
$ 83
$ 3
–
$ 3
$ 36
1
$ 37
2012
(restated)
$ 121
8
$ 129
$
(3)
(14)
$ (17)
$
(7)
–
$
(7)
141
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
The amounts recognized in the balance sheet are
determined as follows:
For the years ended December 31
Present value of funded obligations
Fair value of plan assets
(Surplus) deficit of funded plans
Present value of unfunded obligations
Total deficit of defined benefit pension plans
Impact of minimum funding requirement/
asset ceiling
2013
$ 216
(216)
$
–
72
$ 72
2012
(restated)
$ 241
(207)
$ 34
87
$ 121
5
–
Liability in the balance sheet
$ 77
$ 121
a) Defined Benefit Pension Plans
We have qualified defined benefit pension plans that
cover certain of our United States and Canadian
employees and provide benefits based on an employee’s
years of service. The plans operate under similar
regulatory frameworks and generally face similar risks.
The majority of benefit payments are from trustee-
administered funds; however, there are also a number
of unfunded plans where the Company meets the
benefit payment obligation as it falls due. Plan assets
held in trust are governed by local regulations and
practice in each country. Responsibility for governance
of the plans – overseeing all aspects of the plans
including investment decisions and contribution
schedules – lies with the Company. We have set up
pension committees to assist in the management of the
plans and have also appointed experienced independent
professional experts such as actuaries, custodians and
trustees. In 2012, certain vested participants elected
a lump sum to settle their obligations, resulting in
a settlement gain of $7 million.
Present value
of obligation
$ 361
1
14
(1)
Fair value
of plan
assets
$ (227)
–
(11)
(6)
Total
$ 134
1
3
(7)
$ 375
$ (244)
$ 131
3
23
(2)
$ 24
–
(32)
(39)
$ 328
1
11
$ 340
$
6
(25)
(5)
–
$ (24)
(4)
–
(24)
–
–
(17)
(17)
(17)
32
39
$
3
23
(19)
7
(17)
–
–
$
$ (207)
–
(9)
$ 121
1
2
$ (216)
$ 124
$
$
–
–
(17)
–
(17)
1
(8)
24
$
6
(25)
(22)
–
$ (41)
(3)
(8)
–
$ 288
$ (216)
$ 72
Impact of minimum
funding requirement/
asset ceiling
$ –
–
–
–
$ –
–
–
–
$ –
–
–
–
$ –
–
–
$ –
$ –
–
–
5
$ 5
–
–
–
$ 5
Total
$ 134
1
3
(7)
$ 131
3
23
(19)
7
(17)
–
–
$
$ 121
1
2
$ 124
$
6
(25)
(22)
5
$ (36)
(3)
(8)
–
$ 77
At January 1, 2012 (restated)
Current service cost
Interest expense (income)
Gains on settlements
Remeasurements:
Loss from demographic assumptions
Loss from financial assumptions
Experience gains
Contributions – employers
Benefit payments
Settlements
At December 31, 2012 (restated)
Current service cost
Interest expense (income)
Remeasurements:
Loss from demographic assumptions
Gain from financial assumptions
Experience gains
Change in asset ceiling
Exchange differences
Contributions – employers
Benefit payments
At December 31, 2013
142
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
The significant actuarial assumptions were as follows:
As at December 31
Discount rate
Pension Plans 2013
Other Post-Retirement
Benefits 2013
Pension Plans 2012
Other Post-Retirement
Benefits 2012
2.15–4.90%
3.90–4.10%
1.75–4.55%
2.95–3.10%
The sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to changes in assumptions is set out below. The effects on each plan
of a change in an assumption are weighted proportionately to the total plan obligations to determine the total impact
for each assumption presented.
Change in assumption
Increase in assumption
Decrease in assumption
Impact on defined benefit obligation
Discount rate
0.50%
Life expectancy
Decrease by 5%
Increase by 1 year
in assumption
Increase by 4%
Increase by 5%
Decrease by 1 year
in assumption
Decrease by 4%
b) Other Post-Retirement Benefits
We provide post-retirement medical, dental, and life insurance benefits to certain employees in the US. All of
these plans are unfunded. In 2012, one of our health care plans was wound up, resulting in a settlement gain of
$14 million.
The movement in the defined benefit liability over the year is as follows:
Present value
of obligation
Fair value of
plan assets
At January 1, 2012 (restated)
Settlements
Remeasurements:
Loss from financial assumptions
Experience gains
Contributions – employers
Benefit payments
At December 31, 2012 (restated)
Current service cost
Remeasurements:
Experience gains
Contributions – employers
Benefit payments
At December 31, 2013
$ 24
(14)
$ 10
1
(1)
$ –
–
(2)
$ 8
–
$ 8
(1)
$ (1)
–
(1)
$ 6
$ –
–
$ –
–
–
$ –
(2)
2
$ –
–
$ –
–
$ –
(1)
1
$ –
Total
$ 24
(14)
$ 10
1
(1)
$ –
(2)
–
$ 8
–
$ 8
(1)
$ (1)
(1)
–
$ 6
143
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
The sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to changes in assumptions is set out below. The effects on each plan
of a change in an assumption are weighted proportionately to the total plan obligations to determine the total impact
for each assumption presented.
Change in assumption
Increase in assumption
Decrease in assumption
Impact on defined benefit obligation
Discount rate
Healthcare cost increase
0.50%
1%
Life expectancy
Plan assets, which are funding the Company’s defined
pension plans are comprised as follows:
2013
2012
As at December 31
in %
Total
in %
Total
Composition of plan assets1
Equity instruments
Fixed income securities
53%
47%
$ 116
100
52%
48%
$ 108
99
100%
$ 216
100%
$ 207
1. Holdings in equity and fixed income securities consist of Level 1 and
Level 2 assets within the fair value hierarchy.
Through the defined benefit pension plans and other
post-retirement benefit plans, we are exposed to a number
of risks, the most significant of which are detailed below:
Asset Volatility
The plan liabilities are calculated using a discount rate
that was developed by matching the cash flows
underlying the pension obligation with a spot rate curve
based on the actual returns available on high-quality
(Moody’s Aa) US corporate bonds. If plan assets
underperform this yield, this will create a deficit. Our
plans hold a significant proportion of equities, which
contribute a certain degree of risk and volatility.
As the plans mature, we intend to reduce the level
of investment risk by investing more in assets that better
match the liabilities. However, we believe that due to
the long-term nature of the plan liabilities, a level of
continuing equity investment is an appropriate
component of our long-term strategy to manage the
plans efficiently.
Changes in Bond Yields
A decrease in corporate bond yields will increase plan
liabilities, although this would likely be partially offset by
an increase in the value of the plan’s bond holdings.
Decrease by 3.4%
Increase by 7.9%
Increase by 1 year
in assumption
Increase by 9%
Increase by 3.6%
Decrease by 7.0%
Decrease by 1 year
in assumption
Decrease by 8.7%
Inflation Risk
Most of the plan’s obligations are linked to inflation and
higher inflation will lead to higher liabilities (although, in
most cases, caps on the level of inflationary increases are
in place to protect the plan against extreme inflation).
The majority of the plan’s assets are either unaffected by
(fixed interest bonds) or loosely correlated with (equities)
inflation, meaning that an increase in inflation will also
increase the deficit.
Life Expectancy
The majority of the plans’ obligations are to provide
benefit for the life of the member, so increases in the life
expectancy will result in an increase in the plan’s liabilities.
Each sensitivity analysis disclosed in this note is based
on changing one assumption while holding all other
assumptions constant. In practice, this is unlikely to
occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be
correlated. When calculating the sensitivity of the
defined benefit obligation to variations in significant
actuarial assumptions, the same method (present value
of the defined benefit obligation calculated with the
projected unit credit method at the end of the reporting
period) has been applied as for calculating the liability
recognized in the balance sheet.
In case of the funded plans, the Company ensures
that the investment positions are managed within an
asset-liability matching (ALM) framework that has been
developed to achieve long-term investments that are in
line with the obligations under the pension plans. Within
this framework, the Company’s ALM objective is to
match assets to the pension obligations by investing in
long-term fixed interest securities with maturities that
match the benefit payments as they fall due and in the
appropriate currency. The Company actively monitors
how the duration and the expected yield of the
investments are matching the expected cash outflows
144
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
arising from the pension obligations. The Company has
not changed the processes used to manage its risks from
previous periods. The Company does not currently use
derivatives to manage its risk. Investments are well
diversified, such that the failure of any single investment
would not have a material impact on the overall level of
assets. All of the assets in 2013 consist of equities and
fixed income securities. The Company believes that
equities offer the best returns over the long term with an
acceptable level of risk. The majority of equities are in a
globally diversified portfolio of international blue chip
entities. The plans are not exposed to significant foreign
currency risk.
The Company has fully funded pension plans
(mostly in the US) at December 31, 2013. The expected
contribution to post-employment benefit plans for
the year ending December 31, 2013 is $8 million
(2012: $10 million).
The weighted average duration of the defined
benefit obligation is 10 years (2012: 11 years).
Less Between Between
1–2
years
than a
year
years
2–5 Over 5
years
Total
Pension benefits
Other post-
retirement benefits
At December 31,
2012
$ 22
$ 22
$ 64
$ 405
$ 513
2
1
1
6
10
$ 24
$ 23
$ 65
$ 411
$ 523
Pension benefits
Other post-retirement
benefits
$ 21
$ 21
$ 61
$ 381 $ 484
1
1
1
6
9
At December 31,
2013
$ 22
$ 22
$ 62
$ 387
$ 493
c) Defined Contribution Pension Plans
Certain employees take part in defined contribution
employee benefit plans and we also have a retirement
plan for certain officers of the Company. Our share of
contributions to these plans, which is expensed in the
year it is earned by the employee, was $64 million in
2013 (2012: $66 million).
35 Contingencies
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial
statements are issued that may result in a loss to the
Company, but which will only be resolved when one or
more future events occur or fail to occur. The impact
of any resulting loss from the matters noted below may
be material.
a) Litigation and Claims
In assessing loss contingencies related to legal
proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted
claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company
with assistance from its legal counsel evaluate the
perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted
claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of
relief sought or expected to be sought.
Shareholder Class Action
On December 6, 2013, lead counsel and plaintiffs in the
securities class action filed a consolidated amended
complaint (the “Complaint”) in the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”), on
behalf of anyone who purchased the common stock of
the Company between May 7, 2009, and November 1,
2013. The Complaint asserts claims against the Company
and individual defendants Jamie Sokalsky, Aaron Regent,
Ammar Al-Joundi, Igor Gonzales, Peter Kinver, George
Potter and Sybil Veenman (collectively, the “Defendants”).
The Complaint alleges that the Defendants made false
and misleading statements to the investing public
relating (among other things) to the cost of the Pascua-
Lama project (the “Project”), the amount of time it
would take before production commenced at the Project,
and the environmental risks of the Project, as well as
alleged internal control failures. The Complaint seeks an
unspecified amount of damages.
The Complaint largely tracks the legal theories
advanced in three prior complaints filed on June 5,
2013, June 14, 2013 and August 2, 2013. The Court
consolidated those complaints and appointed lead
counsel and lead plaintiffs for the resulting consolidated
action in September 2013.
The Defendants’ motion to dismiss will be filed on
February 11, 2014, the opposition to the Defendants’
motion is due on March 14, 2014, and Defendants’ reply
brief is due on April 11, 2014. The Company intends to
vigorously defend this matter. No amounts have been
recorded for any potential liability arising from this
matter, as the Company cannot reasonably predict
the outcome.
Pascua-Lama – Constitutional Protection Action
On July 15, 2013, the Court of Appeals of Copiapo,
Chile issued a decision on the constitutional protection
action filed in September 2012, ruling that Compania
Minera Nevada (“CMN”), Barrick’s Chilean subsidiary
that holds the Chilean portion of the Pascua-Lama
project, must complete the Project’s water management
system in compliance with the environmental permit to
145
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
the satisfaction of Chile’s environmental regulator (the
Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente or “SMA”) before
resuming construction activities in Chile. This ruling
was confirmed by the Chilean Supreme Court on
September 25, 2013.
In September 2013, a new constitutional protection
action was filed against CMN alleging that the company
is conducting activities at the Project that are not
authorized by the July 15, 2013 decision of the Court of
Appeals of Copiapo or the May 2013 Resolution of the
SMA (for more information on the SMA Resolution see
“Pascua-Lama – Challenge to SMA Regulatory Sanction”
below). The Court of Appeals of Antofagasta admitted
the case for review but declined to issue the preliminary
injunction requested by the plaintiff. The challenged
activities include the Project’s environmental monitoring
as well as the operation and maintenance of facilities in
connection with the completion of the Project’s water
management system. The plaintiff, a lawyer acting on
her own behalf, alleges that these activities infringe her
constitutional right to life and to live in an environment
free of contamination. The relief sought in the action is
the complete suspension of these activities and the
adoption by the SMA of administrative measures to,
among other things, inspect the works and commence
sanction proceedings against CMN as appropriate. On
October 22, 2013, the SMA informed the Court that
CMN is authorized to perform all of the activities
challenged by the plaintiff. The Company intends to
vigorously defend this matter. No amounts have been
recorded for any potential liability or asset impairment
arising from this matter, as the Company cannot
reasonably predict the outcome, but believes that the
challenged activities are authorized.
Pascua-Lama – Challenge to SMA Regulatory Sanction
In May 2013, CMN received a Resolution (the
“Resolution”) from the SMA that requires the company
to complete the water management system for the
Project in accordance with the Project’s environmental
permit before resuming construction activities in
Chile. The Resolution also required CMN to pay an
administrative fine of approximately $16 million for
deviations from certain requirements of the Project’s
Chilean environmental approval, including a series of
reporting requirements and instances of non-compliance
related to the Project’s water management system. CMN
paid the administrative fine in May 2013. In June 2013,
a group of local farmers and indigenous communities
challenged the Resolution. The challenge, which was
brought in the Environmental Court of Santiago, Chile
146
(the “Environmental Court”), claims that the fine
was inadequate and requests more severe sanctions
against CMN including the revocation of the Project’s
environmental permit. The SMA presented its defense of
the Resolution in July 2013. On August 2, 2013, CMN
joined as a party to this proceeding and has vigorously
defended the Resolution. The hearing was held before
the Environmental Court on September 4, 2013. A
court-ordered inspection of the Pascua-Lama Project site
took place on December 5, 2013. CMN presented
additional environmental information to the
Environmental Court on January 15, 2014, and the
decision of the Court is pending. No amounts have been
recorded for any potential liability or asset impairment
arising from this matter, as the Company cannot
reasonably predict the outcome or, in particular, the
potential financial impact in the event that more severe
sanctions are imposed.
Pascua-Lama – Environmental Damage Claim
In June 2013, a group of local farmers filed an
environmental damage claim against CMN in the
Environmental Court, alleging that CMN has damaged
glaciers located in the Project area. The plaintiffs are
seeking a court order requiring CMN to remedy the
alleged damage and implement measures to prevent
such environmental impact from continuing, including
by halting construction of the Project in Chile. CMN
presented its defense on October 9, 2013. A settlement
and evidentiary hearing took place on January 8, 2014.
Having failed to reach a settlement during that hearing,
the parties proceeded to present documentary evidence
and witness testimony to the Environmental Court. The
hearing will resume in late February 2014. The Company
intends to vigorously defend this matter. No amounts
have been recorded for any potential liability or asset
impairment arising from this matter, as the Company
cannot reasonably predict the outcome.
Argentine Glacier Legislation and
Constitutional Litigation
On September 30, 2010, the National Law on Minimum
Requirements for the Protection of Glaciers was enacted
in Argentina, and came into force in early November
2010. The federal law bans new mining exploration and
exploitation activities on glaciers and in the “peri-glacial”
environment, and subjects ongoing mining activities to
an environmental audit. If such audit identifies significant
impacts on glaciers and peri-glacial environment, the
relevant authority is empowered to take action, which
according to the legislation could include the suspension
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 or relocation of the activity. In the case of the Veladero
mine and the Pascua-Lama project, the competent
authority is the Province of San Juan. In late January
2013, the Province announced that it had completed the
required environmental audit, which concluded that
Veladero and Pascua-Lama do not impact glaciers or
peri-glaciers.
The constitutionality of the federal glacier law is the
subject of a challenge before the National Supreme
Court of Argentina, which has not yet ruled on the issue.
No amounts have been recorded for any potential liability
or asset impairment under this matter, as the Company
cannot reasonably predict the outcome and in any event
the provincial audit concluded that the Company’s
activities do not impact glaciers or peri-glaciers.
Marinduque Complaint
Placer Dome Inc. was named the sole defendant in a
Complaint filed in October 2005 by the Provincial
Government of Marinduque, an island province of the
Philippines (“Province”), with the District Court in Clark
County, Nevada (the “Court”). The complaint asserted
that Placer Dome Inc. was responsible for alleged
environmental degradation with consequent economic
damages and impacts to the environment in the vicinity
of the Marcopper mine that was owned and operated by
Marcopper Mining Corporation (“Marcopper”). Placer
Dome Inc. indirectly owned a minority shareholding of
39.9% in Marcopper until the divestiture of its
shareholding in 1997. The Province sought “to recover
damages for injuries to the natural, ecological and
wildlife resources within its territory”. In addition, the
Province sought compensation for the costs of restoring
the environment, an order directing Placer Dome Inc. to
undertake and complete “the remediation, environmental
cleanup, and balancing of the ecology of the affected
areas,” and payment of the costs of environmental
monitoring. The Complaint addressed the discharge of
mine tailings into Calancan Bay, the 1993 Maguila-guila
dam breach, the 1996 Boac river tailings spill, and
alleged past and continuing damage from acid rock
drainage. In October 2010, the Court issued an order
granting the Company’s motion to dismiss the action on
the grounds of forum non conveniens. The Province has
appealed the Court’s dismissal order to the Nevada
Supreme Court. The Company intends to continue to
defend the action vigorously. No amounts have been
recorded for any potential liability under this complaint,
as the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome.
Perilla Complaint
In 2009, Barrick Gold Inc. and Placer Dome Inc. were
purportedly served in Ontario with a complaint filed in
November 2008 in the Regional Trial Court of Boac
(the “Court”), on the Philippine island of Marinduque,
on behalf of two named individuals and purportedly on
behalf of the approximately 200,000 residents of
Marinduque. The complaint alleges injury to the
economy and the ecology of Marinduque as a result of
the discharge of mine tailings from the Marcopper mine
into Calancan Bay, the Boac River, and the Mogpog River.
The plaintiffs are claiming for abatement of a public
nuisance allegedly caused by the tailings discharge and
for nominal damages for an alleged violation of their
constitutional right to a balanced and healthful ecology.
In June 2010, Barrick Gold Inc. and Placer Dome Inc.
filed a motion to have the Court resolve their unresolved
motions to dismiss before considering the plaintiffs’
motion to admit an amended complaint and also filed an
opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion to admit on the same
basis. It is not known when these motions or the
outstanding motions to dismiss will be decided by the
Court. The Company intends to defend the action
vigorously. No amounts have been recorded for any
potential liability under this complaint, as the Company
cannot reasonably predict the outcome.
Writ of Kalikasan
In February 2011, a Petition for the Issuance of a Writ
of Kalikasan with Prayer for Temporary Environmental
Protection Order was filed in the Supreme Court of the
Republic of the Philippines (the “Supreme Court”) in
Eliza M. Hernandez, Mamerto M. Lanete and Godofredo
L. Manoy versus Placer Dome Inc. and Barrick Gold
Corporation (the “Petition”). In March 2011, the
Supreme Court issued an En Banc Resolution and Writ of
Kalikasan, directed service of summons on Placer Dome
Inc. and the Company, ordered Placer Dome Inc. and the
Company to make a verified return of the Writ with ten
(10) days of service and referred the case to the Court of
Appeal for hearing. The Petition alleges that Placer Dome
Inc. violated the petitioners’ constitutional right to a
balanced and healthful ecology as a result of, among
other things, the discharge of tailings into Calancan Bay,
the 1993 Maguila-Guila dam break, the 1996 Boac river
tailings spill and failure of Marcopper to properly
decommission the Marcopper mine. The petitioners have
pleaded that the Company is liable for the alleged
actions and omissions of Placer Dome Inc., which was a
147
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 minority indirect shareholder of Marcopper at all relevant
times, and is seeking orders requiring the Company to
environmentally remediate the areas in and around the
mine site that are alleged to have sustained environmental
impacts. The petitioners purported to serve the Company
in March 2011, following which the Company filed an
Urgent Motion For Ruling on Jurisdiction with the
Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the
Rules of Procedure in Environmental Cases (the
“Environmental Rules”) pursuant to which the Petition
was filed, as well as the jurisdiction of the Supreme
Court over the Company. In November 2011, two local
governments, or “baranguays” (Baranguay San Antonio
and Baranguay Lobo) filed a motion with the Supreme
Court seeking intervenor status with the intention of
seeking a dismissal of the proceedings. No decision has
as yet been issued with respect to the Urgent Motion for
Ruling on Jurisdiction, the motion for intervention, or
certain other matters before the Supreme Court. The
Company intends to continue to defend the action
vigorously. No amounts have been recorded for any
potential liability under this matter, as the Company
cannot reasonably predict the outcome.
Cortez Hills Complaint
In November 2008, the United States Bureau of Land
Management (the “BLM”) issued a Record of Decision
approving the Cortez Hills Expansion Project, following
which the TeMoak Shoshone Tribe, the East Fork Band
Council of the TeMoak Shoshone Tribe and the Timbisha
Shoshone Tribe, the Western Shoshone Defense Project,
and Great Basin Resource Watch filed a lawsuit against
the United States seeking to enjoin the majority of the
activities comprising the Project on various grounds.
In December 2009, on appeal from a decision denying
certain of the plaintiffs’ claims, the United States Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (the “Court of Appeals”)
issued an opinion in which it held that the plaintiffs were
likely to succeed on two of their claims and ordered that
a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”)
be prepared by Barrick. In March 2011, the BLM issued
its record of decision that approved the supplemental
EIS. In January 2012, the District Court issued a decision
granting summary judgment in favor of Barrick and the
BLM on all remaining issues. The plaintiffs have appealed
this decision to the Court of Appeals, which held oral
arguments in September 2013. A decision of the Court
of Appeals is pending. No amounts have been recorded
for any potential liability or asset impairment arising from
this matter, as the Company cannot reasonably predict
the outcome.
148
b) Other Contingencies
Jabal Sayid
Since the Company acquired its interest in the Jabal
Sayid project through its acquisition of Equinox Minerals
in 2011, the Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources
(“DMMR”), which oversees the mining license, has
questioned whether such change in the indirect
ownership of the project, as well as previous changes
in ownership, required the prior consent of the DMMR.
In December 2012, the DMMR required the project
to cease commissioning of the plant using stockpiled
ore, citing alleged noncompliances with the mining
investment law and the mining license, and in January
2013 required related companies to cease exploration
activities, citing noncompliance with the law and the
exploration licenses related to the ownership changes.
The Company does not believe that such consent was
required as a matter of law, but has responded to
requests of the DMMR, including through the provision
of additional guarantees and undertakings, and expressed
its desire to fully satisfy any related requirements of the
DMMR. Other regulatory agencies may decline to issue
or renew licenses as a result of the position being taken
by the DMMR. The Company is progressing discussions
with the DMMR and is also evaluating alternatives such
as further curtailing or suspending activities on site until
a resolution is achieved, which could lead to further
impairment losses on the value of the asset.
Veladero
Production at the Company’s Veladero mine in Argentina
has been impacted by a build-up of ounces on the leach
pad due to restrictions that affect the amount of solution
that can be applied to the mine’s heap leaching process.
The Company is in discussions with regulatory authorities
with respect to permit amendments to reflect the current
circumstances and to allow operation of the leach pad in
alignment with permit requirements. The Company
expects to receive the requested permit amendments
pursuant to these discussions. However, failure to obtain
the permit amendments in a timely manner would have
an increasing impact on the Company’s 2014 production
at Veladero and potentially on the relationship with the
San Juan provincial mining authority (the Instituto
Provincial de Exploraciones y Explotaciones Mineras or
“IPEEM”) under the exploitation agreement governing
the Company’s right to operate the Veladero mine.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources
The tables on the next seven pages set forth Barrick’s interest in the total proven and probable gold and copper
reserves and in the total measured, indicated and inferred gold, copper and nickel resources and certain related
information at each property. For further details of proven and probable mineral reserves and measured, indicated and
inferred mineral resources by category, metal and property, see pages 150 to 156.
The Company has carefully prepared and verified the mineral reserve and mineral resource figures and believes
that its method of estimating mineral reserves has been verified by mining experience. These figures are estimates,
however, and no assurance can be given that the indicated quantities of metal will be produced. Metal price fluctuations
may render mineral reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomic. Moreover, short-term
operating factors relating to the mineral reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the
processing of new or different ore grades, could affect the Company’s profitability in any particular accounting period.
Definitions
A mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of
diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid
fossilized organic material including base and precious
metals, coal, and industrial minerals in or on the Earth’s
crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or
quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic
extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological
characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are
known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological
evidence and knowledge. Mineral resources are
sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence,
into inferred, indicated and measured categories.
An inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral
resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be
estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited
sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified,
geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on
limited information and sampling gathered through
appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops,
trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.
An indicated mineral resource is that part of a
mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality,
densities, shape and physical characteristics, can be
estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to
allow the appropriate application of technical and
economic parameters, to support mine planning and
evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The
estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration
and testing information gathered through appropriate
techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches,
pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely
enough for geological and grade continuity to be
reasonably assumed.
A measured mineral resource is that part of a
mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality,
densities, shape and physical characteristics are so well
established that they can be estimated with confidence
sufficient to allow the appropriate application of
technical and economic parameters, to support
production planning and evaluation of the economic
viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed
and reliable exploration, sampling and testing
information gathered through appropriate techniques
from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings
and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm
both geological and grade continuity.
Mineral resources, which are not mineral reserves,
do not have demonstrated economic viability.
A mineral reserve is the economically mineable
part of a measured or indicated mineral resource
demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.
This study must include adequate information on mining,
processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant
factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that
economic extraction can be justified.
A mineral reserve includes diluting materials and
allowances for losses that may occur when the material
is mined. Mineral reserves are sub-divided in order of
increasing confidence into probable mineral reserves and
proven mineral reserves. A probable mineral reserve is
the economically mineable part of an indicated and, in
some circumstances, a measured mineral resource
demonstrated by a least a preliminary feasibility study.
This study must include adequate information on mining,
processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant
factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that
economic extraction can be justified.
A proven mineral reserve is the economically
mineable part of a measured mineral resource
demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.
This study must include adequate information on mining,
processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant
factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that
economic extraction is justified.
149
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 Summary Gold Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources1,2,3
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
Tons
(000s)
Grade Ounces
(000s)
(oz/ton)
Tons
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Ounces
(000s)
84,255
5,909
10,474
5,985
94,729
11,894
102,342
127,432
207,710
100,465
–
75,540
135,051
206,436
10,037
90,521
46,459
42,014
20,525
32,627
4,963
178,429
14,112
58,253
88,195
12,333
4,023
4,717
–
298,358
990,088
251,960
357,836
173,574
205,718
181,204
100,089
37,252
–
–
8,122
0.096
413
0.070
2,585
0.247
1,810
0.302
0.113 10,707
2,223
0.187
9,694
0.095
9,011
0.071
0.053 11,024
4,914
0.049
–
–
9,960
0.132
2,460
0.018
3,579
0.017
5,070
0.505
0.127 11,488
919
0.020
904
0.022
1,007
0.049
1,440
0.044
140
0.028
3,612
0.020
1,019
0.072
1,903
0.033
1,389
0.016
158
0.013
196
0.049
170
0.036
–
–
0.065 19,503
0.018 17,434
2,530
0.010
0.043 15,384
6,459
0.037
5,117
0.025
3,588
0.020
3,751
0.037
757
0.020
–
–
–
–
94,541
3,621
14,632
6,144
109,173
9,765
181,788
133,565
306,190
50,943
–
65,914
295,559
125,190
15,258
79,690
70,683
44,293
33,770
16,377
7,823
172,646
16,424
55,899
108,257
16,750
6,164
1,715
–
298,358
990,088
245,990
424,117
269,930
471,153
30,186
205,008
39,462
50,013
2,764
8,933
0.094
118
0.033
3,405
0.233
0.303
1,864
0.113 12,338
1,982
0.203
0.083 15,008
0.063
8,353
0.049 15,058
0.053
2,701
–
–
8,367
0.127
5,161
0.017
1,472
0.012
5,815
0.381
9,552
0.120
1,243
0.018
925
0.021
1,421
0.042
731
0.045
326
0.042
3,463
0.020
1,150
0.070
1,827
0.033
1,640
0.015
207
0.012
318
0.052
55
0.032
–
–
0.065 19,503
0.018 17,434
0.010
2,494
0.042 17,861
6,734
0.025
0.021 10,024
400
0.013
5,828
0.028
669
0.017
542
0.011
41
0.015
Based on attributable ounces
North America
Goldstrike Open Pit
Goldstrike Underground
Goldstrike Property Total
Pueblo Viejo (60.00%)
Cortez
Goldrush
Bald Mountain
Turquoise Ridge (75.00%)
Round Mountain (50.00%)
South Arturo (60.00%)
Ruby Hill
Hemlo
Marigold Mine (33.33%)
Golden Sunlight
Donlin Gold (50.00%)
South America
Cerro Casale (75.00%)
Pascua-Lama
Veladero
Lagunas Norte
Pierina4
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
1. Resources which are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2. See accompanying footnote #1.
3. Measured plus indicated resources
4. See accompanying footnote #2.
150
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Summary Gold Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources1,2,3
For the years ended December 31
2013
2012
Based on attributable ounces
Australia Pacific
Porgera (95.00%)
Kalgoorlie (50.00%)
Cowal
Plutonic
Kanowna Belle
Darlot5
Granny Smith5
Lawlers5
Africa
Bulyanhulu (73.90%)
North Mara (73.90%)
Buzwagi (73.90%)
Nyanzaga (73.90%)
Tulawaka (51.73%)6
Other
Total
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
(proven and probable)
(mineral resource)
1. Resources which are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2. See accompanying footnote #1.
3. Measured plus indicated resources
4. See accompanying footnote #2.
5. See accompanying footnote #3.
6. See accompanying footnote #4.
Tons
(000s)
Grade Ounces
(000s)
(oz/ton)
Tons
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Ounces
(000s)
25,501
40,334
101,183
27,762
52,772
69,807
488
4,634
2,884
3,739
–
–
–
–
–
–
30,616
8,329
17,684
20,581
19,636
40,004
–
79,303
–
–
0.120
0.080
0.037
0.043
0.034
0.032
0.268
0.191
0.141
0.137
–
–
–
–
–
–
0.227
0.311
0.092
0.097
0.042
0.038
–
0.038
–
–
3,051
3,238
3,718
1,204
1,816
2,203
131
883
408
513
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,937
2,588
1,634
1,991
828
1,506
–
3,032
–
–
65,476
30,705
108,253
21,247
83,632
29,322
1,077
2,619
4,071
4,827
2,685
573
34,795
5,511
2,963
670
30,111
8,694
27,865
15,573
51,592
12,116
–
63,672
24
540
0.095
0.077
0.039
0.035
0.033
0.035
0.191
0.298
0.155
0.127
0.126
0.204
0.054
0.067
0.131
0.206
0.267
0.282
0.080
0.114
0.039
0.030
–
0.042
0.458
0.193
6,221
2,361
4,195
737
2,764
1,034
206
781
632
614
338
117
1,866
368
387
138
8,040
2,453
2,226
1,781
1,994
360
–
2,681
11
104
27,930
959
0.008
0.005
217
5
26,494
3,501
0.008
0.001
201
2
2,660,571
2,178,461
0.039 104,051
0.046 99,362
3,730,506
1,859,007
0.038 140,248
0.045 83,007
151
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Gold Mineral Reserves1
As at December 31, 2013
Based on attributable ounces
North America
Goldstrike Open Pit
Goldstrike Underground
Goldstrike Property Total
Pueblo Viejo (60.00%)
Cortez
Bald Mountain
Turquoise Ridge (75.00%)
Round Mountain (50.00%)
South Arturo (60.00%)
Ruby Hill
Hemlo
Marigold Mine (33.33%)
Golden Sunlight
South America
Cerro Casale (75.00%)
Pascua-Lama
Veladero
Lagunas Norte
Australia Pacific
Porgera (95.00%)
Kalgoorlie (50.00%)
Cowal
Plutonic
Kanowna Belle
Africa
Bulyanhulu (73.90%)
North Mara (73.90%)
Buzwagi (73.90%)
Other
Total
Proven
Probable
Total
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
60,353
5,592
65,945
24,123
23,874
41,462
4,781
18,235
7
376
1,700
12,007
1,898
0.087
0.265
0.103
0.098
0.066
0.021
0.512
0.022
0.143
0.048
0.078
0.019
0.042
5,280
1,482
6,762
2,358
1,576
857
2,446
394
1
18
133
228
80
23,902
4,882
28,784
78,219
183,836
93,589
5,256
28,224
20,518
4,587
12,412
76,188
2,125
0.119
0.226
0.137
0.094
0.051
0.017
0.499
0.019
0.049
0.027
0.071
0.015
0.055
2,842
1,103
3,945
7,336
9,448
1,603
2,624
525
1,006
122
886
1,161
116
84,255
10,474
94,729
102,342
207,710
135,051
10,037
46,459
20,525
4,963
14,112
88,195
4,023
0.096
8,122
2,585
0.247
0.113 10,707
0.095
9,694
0.053 11,024
2,460
0.018
0.505
5,070
0.020
919
0.049
1,007
140
0.028
1,019
0.072
0.016
1,389
0.049
196
189,900
35,201
23,676
17,054
0.019
0.054
0.023
0.039
3,586
1,887
545
657
800,188
322,635
182,042
83,035
0.017 13,848
0.042 13,497
4,572
0.025
3,094
0.037
990,088
357,836
205,718
100,089
0.018 17,434
0.043 15,384
0.025
5,117
0.037
3,751
2,405
69,620
14,644
213
390
0.239
0.028
0.028
0.268
0.356
574
1,951
406
57
139
23,096
31,563
38,128
275
2,494
0.107
0.056
0.037
0.269
0.108
2,477
1,767
1,410
74
269
25,501
101,183
52,772
488
2,884
0.120
0.037
0.034
0.268
0.141
3,051
3,718
1,816
131
408
331
5,688
4,496
0.332
0.076
0.030
110
431
136
30,285
11,996
15,140
0.225
0.100
0.046
6,827
1,203
692
30,616
17,684
19,636
0.227
0.092
0.042
6,937
1,634
828
493
0.010
5
27,437
0.008
212
27,930
0.008
217
558,519
0.045 25,337
2,102,052
0.037 78,714
2,660,571
0.039 104,051
Copper Mineral Reserves1
As at December 31, 2013
Proven
Probable
Total
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
397,831
259,009
493
0.544
0.553
2.231
4,328
2,864
22
157,229
334,913
27,437
0.531
0.561
2.564
1,669
3,756
1,407
555,060
593,922
27,930
0.540
0.557
2.558
5,997
6,620
1,429
657,333
0.549
7,214
519,579
0.657
6,832
1,176,912
0.597 14,046
Based on attributable pounds
Zaldívar
Lumwana
Jabal Sayid
Total
1. See accompanying footnote #1.
152
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Gold Mineral Resources1,2
As at December 31, 2013
Measured (M)
Indicated (I)
(M) + (I)
Inferred
Based on attributable ounces
North America
Goldstrike Open Pit
Goldstrike Underground
Goldstrike Property Total
Pueblo Viejo (60.00%)
Cortez
Goldrush
Bald Mountain
Turquoise Ridge (75.00%)
Round Mountain (50.00%)
South Arturo (60.00%)
Ruby Hill
Hemlo
Marigold Mine (33.33%)
Golden Sunlight
Donlin Gold (50.00%)
South America
Cerro Casale (75.00%)
Pascua-Lama
Veladero
Lagunas Norte
Australia Pacific
Porgera (95.00%)
Kalgoorlie (50.00%)
Cowal
Plutonic
Kanowna Belle
Africa
Bulyanhulu (73.90%)
North Mara (73.90%)
Buzwagi (73.90%)
Nyanzaga (73.90%)
Other
Total
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Tons Grade
(oz/ton)
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
542
1,412
1,954
3,372
8,029
3,091
49,097
12,266
13,248
7
2,460
336
913
28
4,261
0.076
0.360
0.281
0.075
0.041
0.137
0.020
0.160
0.028
0.143
0.026
0.110
0.014
0.036
0.073
5,367
41
4,573
509
550
9,940
254 124,060
92,436
328
423
72,449
967 157,339
78,255
28,766
32,620
63 175,969
57,917
37
11,420
13
4,689
1
313 294,097
1,958
365
1
372
0.069
1,301
0.284
1,673
0.168
8,757
0.071
4,586
0.050
9,537
0.132
2,612
0.017
9,530
0.122
539
0.019
1,439
0.044
3,549
0.020
1,866
0.032
145
0.013
0.036
169
0.065 19,190
413
1,810
2,223
9,011
4,914
9,960
3,579
11,488
904
1,440
3,612
1,903
158
170
19,503
1,081 0.071
1,302 0.311
2,383 0.202
5,475 0.091
17,344 0.054
39,472 0.141
57,515 0.013
37,131 0.150
27,023 0.016
15,481 0.014
18,343 0.040
1,680 0.143
8,338 0.013
1,926 0.037
50,825 0.059
77
405
482
497
939
5,555
758
5,566
433
220
733
241
108
72
2,997
19,831
16,284
8,370
1,434
0.008
0.044
0.018
0.022
167 232,129
710 157,290
147 172,834
35,818
31
0.010
0.037
0.020
0.020
2,363
5,749
3,441
726
2,530
6,459
3,588
757
416,203 0.011
21,480 0.045
30,725 0.009
5,222 0.021
4,495
975
269
109
11,805
6,214
6,150
498
1,062
0.090
0.044
0.018
0.153
0.166
1,064
271
113
76
176
28,529
21,548
63,657
4,136
2,677
0.076
0.043
0.033
0.195
0.126
2,174
933
2,090
807
337
–
2,646
168
–
–
0.097
0.048
–
–
257
8
–
8,329
17,935
39,836
79,303
0.311
0.097
0.038
0.038
2,588
1,734
1,498
3,032
3,238
1,204
2,203
883
513
2,588
1,991
1,506
3,032
26,595 0.137
759 0.067
11,082 0.028
4,206 0.173
3,050 0.131
3,652
51
314
728
401
5,402 0.376
599 0.080
5,843 0.035
2,478 0.027
2,029
48
202
67
–
–
–
959
0.005
5
5
367 0.011
4
173,524
0.048
8,293 2,004,937
0.045 91,069
99,362
816,947 0.039 31,945
Copper Mineral Resources1,2
As at December 31, 2013
Measured (M)
Indicated (I)
(M) + (I)
Inferred
Based on attributable pounds
Zaldívar
Lumwana
Jabal Sayid
Total
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Tons Grade
(%)
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
110,580
74,432
–
0.445
0.390
–
984
55,939
581 461,967
959
–
0.461
0.519
1.460
516
4,794
28
1,500
5,375
28
10,570 0.591
508 0.591
367 2.725
125
6
20
185,012
0.423
1,565
518,865
0.514
5,338
6,903
11,445 0.660
151
1. Resources which are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2. See accompanying footnote #1.
153
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Contained Silver Within Reported Gold Reserves1
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
In proven
gold reserves
In probable
gold reserves
Total
Based on attributable ounces
North America
Pueblo Viejo (60.00%)
South America
Cerro Casale (75.00%)
Pascua-Lama
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
Africa
Bulyanhulu (73.90%)
Tons Grade
(oz/ton)
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Tons Grade
(oz/ton)
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Tons Grade
(oz/ton)
(000s)
Contained Process
ounces recovery
%
(000s)
24,123
0.71
17,202
78,219
0.56
43,873
102,342
0.60
61,075 87.1%
189,900
35,201
15,606
14,530
0.06
2.04
0.11
0.34
10,565
71,705
1,653
4,880
800,188
322,635
83,035
182,042
0.04
33,451
1.87 603,137
11,299
0.14
84,194
0.46
990,088
357,836
98,641
196,572
0.04
44,016 69.0%
1.89 674,842 81.7%
12,952 19.5%
0.13
89,074 6.5%
0.45
331
0.27
91
30,285
0.21
6,312
30,616
0.21
6,403 75.0%
Total
279,691
0.38 106,096
1,496,404
0.52
782,266
1,776,095
0.50
888,362 72.9%
1. Silver is accounted for as a by-product credit against reported or projected gold production costs.
Contained Copper Within Reported Gold Reserves1
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
In proven
gold reserves
In probable
gold reserves
Total
Based on attributable pounds
North America
Pueblo Viejo (60.00%)
South America
Cerro Casale (75.00%)
Pascua-Lama
Africa
Bulyanhulu (73.90%)
Buzwagi (73.90%)
Tons Grade
(%)
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Tons Grade
(%)
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Tons Grade
(%)
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Process
recovery
%
24,123 0.086
41.4
78,219 0.119
185.8
102,342 0.111
227.2
79.4%
189,900 0.190
35,201 0.094
721.3
66.1
800,188 0.226
322,635 0.069
3,613.3
447.8
990,088 0.219 4,334.6
513.9
357,836 0.072
87.4%
38.5%
331 0.438
4,496 0.068
2.9
6.1
30,285 0.454
15,140 0.110
274.9
33.2
30,616 0.454
19,636 0.100
277.8
39.3
95.0%
70.2%
Total
254,051 0.165
837.8
1,246,467 0.183
4,555.0
1,500,518 0.180 5,392.8
82.7%
1. Copper is accounted for as a by-product credit against reported or projected gold production costs.
154
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Contained Silver Within Reported Gold Resources1
For the year ended December 31, 2013
Measured (M)
Indicated (I)
(M) + (I)
Inferred
Based on attributable ounces
North America
Pueblo Viejo (60.00%)
South America
Cerro Casale (75.00%)
Pascua-Lama
Lagunas Norte
Veladero
Africa
Bulyanhulu (73.90%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
ounces
(000s)
Grade
(oz/ton)
3,372
0.45
1,516 124,060
0.39 47,962
49,478
5,475
0.59 3,237
19,831
16,284
1,434
8,370
0.04
713 232,129
0.77 12,525 157,290
35,818
147
0.10
2,414 172,834
0.29
0.03
7,241
0.65 102,178
2,838
0.08
0.38 65,467
7,954 416,203
114,703 21,480
5,222
67,881 30,725
2,985
0.03 12,566
0.59 12,607
388
0.07
0.38 11,551
–
–
–
8,329
0.25
2,050
2,050
5,155
0.31 1,601
Total
49,291
0.35 17,315 730,460
0.31 227,736
245,051 484,260
0.09 41,950
1. Resources which are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Contained Copper Within Reported Gold Resources1
For the year ended December 31, 2013
In measured (M)
gold resources
In indicated (I)
gold resources
(M) + (I)
Inferred
Based on attributable pounds
North America
Pueblo Viejo (60.00%)
South America
Cerro Casale (75.00%)
Pascua-Lama
Africa
Buzwagi (73.90%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Tons
(000s)
Grade
Contained
lbs
(%) (millions)
3,372
0.12
8.1 124,060
0.093
230.0
238.1
5,475
0.114
12.5
19,831
16,284
0.125
0.072
49.4
23.5
232,129
157,290
0.160
0.061
741.4
193.4
790.8 416,203
21,480
216.9
0.190 1,578.5
17.3
0.040
168
0.12
0.4
39,836
0.109
87.0
87.4
5,843
0.084
9.8
Total
39,655
0.103
81.4
553,315
0.113 1,251.8
1,333.2 449,001
0.180 1,618.1
1. Resources which are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Nickel Mineral Resources1
For the year ended December 31, 2013
Measured (M)
Indicated (I)
(M) + (I)
Inferred
Based on attributable pounds
Africa
Kabanga (50.00%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Tons
(000s)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Grade
(%)
Contained
lbs
(millions)
Tons
(000s)
Grade
Contained
lbs
(%) (millions)
6,619
2.034
269.2
10,951
2.360
516.8
786.0
9,623
2.235 430.2
1. Resources which are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
155
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Mineral Reserves and Resources Notes
1. Mineral reserves (“reserves”) and mineral resources (“resources”) have been calculated as at December 31, 2013 in accordance with National Instrument
43-101 as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities. For United States reporting purposes, Industry Guide 7, (under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934), as interpreted by Staff of the SEC, applies different standards in order to classify mineralization as a reserve. In addition, while the
terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” mineral resources are required pursuant to National Instrument 43-101, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission does not recognize such terms. Canadian standards differ significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
and mineral resource information contained herein is not comparable to similar information regarding mineral reserves disclosed in accordance with the
requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. U.S. investors should understand that “inferred” mineral resources have a great amount of
uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. In addition, U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that
any part or all of Barrick’s mineral resources constitute or will be converted into reserves. Calculations have been prepared by employees of Barrick, its joint
venture partners or its joint venture operating companies, as applicable, under the supervision of Rick Sims, Senior Director, Resources and Reserves, of Barrick,
Steven Haggarty, Senior Director, Metallurgy, of Barrick and Patrick Garretson, Director, LOM Planning, of Barrick. Except as noted below, reserves have been
calculated using an assumed long-term average gold price of $US 1,100 per ounce, a silver price of $US 21.00 per ounce, a copper price of $US 3.00 per
pound and exchange rates of 1.05$Can/$US and 0.90 $US/$Aus. Reserves at Round Mountain have been calculated using an assumed long-term average gold
price of $US 1,200. Reserves at Marigold, Kalgoorlie, Bulyanhulu, North Mara and Buzwagi have been calculated using an assumed long-term average gold
price of $US 1,300. Reserve calculations incorporate current and/or expected mine plans and cost levels at each property. Varying cut-off grades have been
used depending on the mine and type of ore contained in the reserves. Barrick’s normal data verification procedures have been employed in connection with
the calculations. Resources as at December 31, 2013 have been estimated using varying cut-off grades, depending on both the type of mine or project, its
maturity and ore types at each property. For a breakdown of reserves and resources by category and for a more detailed description of the key assumptions,
parameters and methods used in calculating Barrick’s reserves and resources, see Barrick’s most recent Annual Information Form/Form 40-F on file with
Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
2. The Company placed the Pierina mine into closure in 2013. Consequently, the Company removed the estimate of reserves and resources associated with the
Pierina mine from its statement of reserves and resources for 2013.
3. On September 30, 2013, the Company divested the Darlot, Granny Smith and Lawlers mines. For additional information regarding this matter, see page 20
of Barrick’s Year-End Report 2013.
4. African Barrick Gold decided to close the Tulawaka mine in 2013. Consequently, the Company removed the estimate of reserves and resources associated
with the Tulawaka mine from its statement of reserves and resources for 2013.
156
MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCESBarrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Corporate Governance and
Committees of the Board
Corporate Governance
Our Board is committed to acting in the best interests of
the Company and its shareholders. Sound corporate
governance practices contribute to achieving our
strategic and operational plans, goals and objectives.
The Board of Directors has approved a set of
Corporate Governance Guidelines to promote the
effective functioning of the Board of Directors and its
Committees and to set forth a common set of
expectations as to how the Board should manage its
affairs and perform its responsibilities. Barrick has also
adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is
applicable to all directors, officers and employees of
Barrick. In conjunction with the adoption of the Code,
Barrick established a compliance hotline to allow for
anonymous reporting by telephone or Internet portal
of any suspected Code violations, including concerns
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls
or other auditing matters. A copy of the Corporate
Governance Guidelines, the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics and the mandates of the Board of Directors
and each of the Committees of the Board, including
the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and
the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, is
posted on Barrick’s website at www.barrick.com/
company/governance and is available in print from the
Company to any shareholder upon request.
Mr. J. B. Harvey is Barrick’s Lead Director. The
Lead Director facilitates the functioning of the Board
independently from management, serves as an
independent leadership contact for directors and executive
officers, and assists in maintaining and enhancing the
quality of the Company’s corporate governance.
Committees of the Board
Audit Committee
(S.J. Shapiro, H.L. Beck, D. Moyo)
Assists the Board in its oversight of Barrick’s financial
reporting process and the quality, transparency,
and integrity of Barrick’s financial statements and other
relevant public disclosures, the Company’s internal
controls over financial reporting, the Company’s
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
relating to financial reporting, the external auditors’
qualifications and independence, the performance
of the internal and external auditors, and the Company’s
process relating to enterprise risk management.
Compensation Committee
(J.B. Harvey, G.A. Cisneros, S.J. Shapiro)
Assists the Board in designing Barrick’s compensation
policies and practices and administering Barrick’s
share compensation plans. The Committee is responsible
for reviewing and recommending director and
executive compensation.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
(G.A. Cisneros, H.L. Beck, D. Moyo)
Assists the Board with establishing Barrick’s corporate
governance policies and practices, identifying
individuals qualified to become members of the Board,
reviewing the composition and functioning of the
Board and its Committees, and succession planning
for senior executives.
Corporate Responsibility Committee
(C.W.D. Birchall, D. Moyo, J.L. Thornton)
Assists the Board in overseeing Barrick’s programs
and performance relating to environmental, health and
safety, corporate social responsibility and human
rights matters.
Finance Committee
(C.W.D. Birchall, H.L. Beck, A. Munk, J.C. Sokalsky)
Reviews the Company’s financial structure and
investment and financial risk management programs.
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 157
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Shareholder Information
Shares are traded on two stock exchanges
New York
Toronto
Ticker Symbol
ABX
Number of Registered Shareholders at
December 31, 2013
17,284
Index Listings
S&P/TSX Composite Index
S&P/TSX 60 Index
S&P Global 1200 Index
Philadelphia Gold/Silver Index
NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index
Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) – North America
Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) – World
2013 Dividend per Share
US$0.50
Share Trading Information
New York Stock Exchange
Common Shares
(millions)
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
Weighted average 2013
Basic
Fully diluted
1,165
1,022
1,022
The Company’s shares were split on a two-for-one basis
in 1987, 1989 and 1993.
Volume of Shares Traded
(millions)
NYSE
TSX
Closing Price of Shares
December 31, 2013
NYSE
TSX
2013
2012
1,266
989
647
781
US$17.63
C$18.71
Quarter
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Toronto Stock Exchange
Quarter
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Share Volume
(millions)
High
Low
2013
2012
2013
2012
2013
2012
173
426
349
318
1,266
145
180
175
147
647
Share Volume
(millions)
US$36.07
29.39
21.20
20.62
US$50.38
44.49
43.15
42.53
US$28.31
14.67
13.43
15.27
US$42.21
34.82
31.00
32.81
High
Low
2013
2012
2013
2012
2013
2012
168
327
249
245
989
177
185
195
163
720
C$35.50
29.89
22.29
21.55
C$50.33
44.75
42.08
41.73
C$29.08
15.41
14.22
16.33
C$42.19
35.11
31.18
32.43
158
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
For information on such matters as share transfers,
dividend cheques and change of address, inquiries
should be directed to the Company’s Transfer Agents.
Transfer Agents and Registrars
CST Trust Company
P.O. Box 700, Postal Station B
Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3B 3K3
or
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 – 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY, USA 11219
Tel: 1-800-387-0825
Toll-free throughout North America
Fax: 1-888-249-6189
Email: inquiries@canstockta.com
Website: www.canstockta.com
Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Toronto, Ontario
Annual and Special Meeting
The Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders will
be held on Wednesday, April 30, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.
(Toronto time) in the Metro Toronto Convention Centre,
John Bassett Theatre, 255 Front Street West,
Toronto, Ontario.
Dividend Policy
The Board of Directors reviews the dividend policy
quarterly based on the cash requirements of the
Company’s operating assets, exploration and
development activities, as well as potential acquisitions,
combined with the current and projected financial
position of the Company.
Dividend Payments
In 2013, the Company paid a cash dividend of $0.50 per
share – $0.20 on March 15, $0.20 on June 17, $0.05 on
September 16, and $0.05 on December 16. A cash
dividend of $0.75 per share was paid in 2012 – $0.15 on
March 15, $0.20 on June 15, $0.20 on September 17
and $0.20 on December 17.
Form 40-F
The Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F is filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission. This report is available on Barrick’s website
www.barrick.com and will be made available to
shareholders, without charge, upon written request
to the Investor Relations Department.
Shareholder Contacts
Shareholders are welcome to contact the Investor
Relations Department for general information on
the Company:
Amy Schwalm
Vice President, Investor Relations
Telephone: 416-307-7422
Email: aschwalm@barrick.com
Susan Muir
Senior Director, Investor Relations
Telephone: 416-307-5107
Email: s.muir@barrick.com
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013 159
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Board of Directors and
Executive Officers
Board of Directors
Howard L. Beck, Q.C.
Toronto, Ontario
Corporate Director
C. William D. Birchall
Toronto, Ontario
Vice Chairman,
Barrick Gold Corporation
Gustavo A. Cisneros
Santo Domingo,
Dominican Republic
Chairman, Cisneros Group
of Companies
J. Brett Harvey
Canonsburg, Pennsylvania
Lead Director
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer,
CONSOL Energy Inc.
Executive Officers
Peter Munk
Chairman
John L. Thornton
Co-Chairman
C. William D. Birchall
Vice Chairman
Jamie C. Sokalsky
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Dambisa Moyo
London, United Kingdom
International Economist
and Commentator
The Right Honourable
Brian Mulroney, P.C.
Montreal, Quebec
Senior Advisor,
Global Affairs,
Barrick Gold Corporation
Chairman,
Barrick International
Advisory Board
Senior Partner,
Norton Rose Fulbright
Canada LLP
Anthony Munk
Toronto, Ontario
Senior Managing Director,
Onex Corporation
Peter Munk, C.C.
Toronto, Ontario
Founder and Chairman,
Barrick Gold Corporation
Steven J. Shapiro
Houston, Texas
Corporate Director
Jamie C. Sokalsky
Toronto, Ontario
President and
Chief Executive Officer,
Barrick Gold Corporation
John L. Thornton
Palm Beach, Florida
Co-Chairman,
Barrick Gold Corporation
Professor and Director of the
Global Leadership Program,
Tsinghua University School of
Economics and Management
Kelvin P.M. Dushnisky
Senior Executive
Vice President
Robert L. Krcmarov
Senior Vice President,
Global Exploration
Darian K. Rich
Senior Vice President,
Human Resources
Ammar Al-Joundi
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Richard G. McCreary
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Development
Sybil E. Veenman
Senior Vice President and
General Counsel
James K. Gowans
Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer
Ivan J. Mullany
Senior Vice President,
Capital Projects
International Advisory Board
The International Advisory Board was established to provide advice to Barrick’s Board of Directors and management on geo-political
and other strategic issues affecting the Company.
Chairman
The Right Honourable
Brian Mulroney
Former Prime Minister
of Canada
Members
His Excellency
José María Aznar
Spain
The Honorable
John Ellis Bush
United States
Gustavo A. Cisneros
Dominican Republic
160
Barrick Gold Corporation | Financial Report 2013
Secretary William S. Cohen
United States
Vernon E. Jordan, Jr.
United States
The Honourable
Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg
Germany
Dr. Philipp M. Hildebrand
United Kingdom
Andrónico Luksic
Chile
Lord Charles Powell of
Bayswater KCMG
United Kingdom
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information
Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report 2013, including any information as to
our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”.
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect”,
“anticipate”, “contemplate”, “target”, “plan”, “intend”, “continue”, “budget”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “schedule” and
similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number
of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the company, are inherently subject to significant business,
economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in
the spot and forward price of gold and copper or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel and electricity); changes
in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls, regulations, expropriation or nationalization of property and
political or economic developments in Canada, the United States and other jurisdictions in which the company does or may
carry on business in the future; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical
challenges associated wzith the construction of capital projects; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing
of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit rating;
the impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or
development activities; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining necessary
licenses and permits; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; risk of loss due to acts of war,
terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments;
litigation; business opportunities that may be presented to, or pursued by, the company; our ability to successfully integrate
acquisitions or complete divestitures; employee relations; availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor;
and, the organization of our African gold operations and properties under a separate listed company. In addition, there are risks
and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards,
industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold/
copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks). Many of
these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report 2013
are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form
on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a discussion of some of the factors underlying
forward-looking statements.
The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
n
a
m
x
e
l
P
w
e
h
t
t
a
M
y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P
e
v
i
t
u
c
e
x
E
/
r
e
h
p
o
t
s
i
r
h
C
r
e
t
e
P
y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P
n
o
i
t
a
c
o
L
/
a
d
a
n
a
C
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
l
l
i
r
r
e
M
/
.
c
n
I
e
l
b
a
e
v
o
M
/
n
g
i
s
e
D
|
d
n
a
r
B
e
v
O
www.barrick.com
Barrick Gold Corporation
Corporate Office:
Brookfield Place
TD Canada Trust Tower
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
P.O. Box 212
Toronto, Canada M5J 2S1
Tel: 416 861-9911
Toll-free throughout North America:
1 800 720-7415
Fax: 416 861-2492
Email: investors@barrick.com
barrick.com
@barrickgold