Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Insurance - Life / Abacus Global Management, Inc.

Abacus Global Management, Inc.

abx · NYSE Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker abx
Exchange NYSE
Sector Financial Services
Industry Insurance - Life
Employees 157
← All annual reports
FY2021 Annual Report · Abacus Global Management, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
An n ua l   Report  2021

Building our future

Contents

001 2021 Highlights 

001 2022 Guidance 

002 Key performance indicators

004 Who we are

005 Our global business

006 Why invest in Barrick?

007 Building our future

008 Letter from the Executive Chairman

010 Board of directors

012 Message from the President and CEO

016 Executive committee

018 Financial review

020 Gold market overview

021 Copper market overview

022 Our regions and operations

034 Reserves and resources

036 Exploration

040 Mining sustainably for a better future

047 Endnotes

048 Financial report 

Barrick Gold Corporation

NYSE : GOLD • TSX : ABX
www.barrick.com

Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts are expressed in US dollars.

B

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation2021 Highlights

GROUP GOLD PRODUCTION 

NET EARNINGS

4.4 Moz

Production guidance achieved 
for 3rd consecutive year

$2,022

MILLION

DEBT, NET OF CASH

$(130)

MILLION

SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTION 
PER SHARE1  

RECORD CASH DISTRIBUTION 
TO SHAREHOLDERS 

ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS 
PER SHAREi

139%

TO $0.79

$1.4

BILLION

$1.16 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES 

$4,378

MILLION

FREE CASH FLOWi

$1,943

MILLION

ISO 45001 AND ISO 14001

100%

of operational sites certified 

1  Declared in respect of the 2021 fiscal year, compared to the 2020 fiscal year.

2022 guidanceii 

GOLD PRODUCTION 
4.2 - 4.6Moz

COST OF SALESi 
$1,070 - 1,150/oz

TOTAL CASH COSTSi 
$730 - 790/oz

AISCi 
$1,040 - 1,120/oz

COPPER PRODUCTION 
420 - 470Mlb

COST OF SALESi 
$2.20 - 2.50/lb

C1 CASH COSTSi 
$1.70 - 1.90/lb

AISCi 
$2.70 - 3.00/lb

TOTAL ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD & COPPER CAPEXi 
$1,900 - 2,200 million

001

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Key performance 
indicators

GOLD PRODUCTION        

GOLD COST OF SALESi 

GOLD TOTAL CASH COSTSi

GOLD AISCi

Moz

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

$/oz

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

$/oz

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

$/oz

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

COPPER PRODUCTION

COPPER COST OF SALESi

COPPER C1 CASH COSTSi

COPPER AISCi

Mlb

500

400

300

200

100

0

$/lb

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

$/lb

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

$/lb

3.00

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

SAFETY FREQUENCY 
RATE STATISTICS

ENVIRONMENTAL 
INCIDENTS

2021 REVENUE
2021 REVENUE
2021 REVENUE

2.24

1.68

1.47

0.50

0.34

0.38

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

20

16

12

8

4

0

13

0

8

0

5

0

2021 REVENUE

285
285
285

962
962
962

285

962

US$ 
US$ 
US$ 
million
million
million
US$ 
million

2019

2020
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)i
Total Recordable Injury Frequency 
Rate (TRIFR)i

2021

2019
Class 1i

2020

2021

Class 2i

10,738
10,738
10,738
10,738

Gold

Gold
Gold
Gold

Copper
Copper
Copper
Copper

Other

Other
Other
Other

002

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationKEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS  (CONTINUED)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES

FREE CASH FLOWi

DEBT, NET OF CASH

SHAREHOLDER 
DISTRIBUTION PER SHARE1

$ million

$ million

$ million

6,000

4,800

3,600

2,400

1,200

0

4,000

3,200

2,400

1,600

800

0

3,000

2,250

1,500

750

0

-750

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

$ 

0.90

0.72

0.54

0.36

0.18

0.00

2019
Base dividend

2020

2021

Return of capital

NET EPS

ADJUSTED NET EPSi

PROJECT CAPITAL 
EXPENDITURES2,i

GOLD AND COPPER PRICE 

1  Declared in respect of the 2019, 
2020 or 2021 fiscal year.

$

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

$

1.20

0.96

0.72

0.48

0.24

0.00

$ million

800

640

480

320

160

0

$/oz

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

2  On a consolidated cash basis.

2019

2020

2021

Market gold price 
Market copper price 

2021 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 
OF GOLD PRODUCTION 

2021 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 
OF COPPER PRODUCTION 

660

Thousand 
ounces 
attributable

2,186

1,591

97

Million 
pounds 
attributable

318

North America

Africa & Middle East

Latin America & Asia Pacific

Africa & Middle East

Latin America & Asia Pacific

$/lb

5.50

4.60

3.70

2.80

1.90

1.00

003

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 
Who we are

Our business

We  are  a  sector-leading  gold  and  copper 
producer,  operating  mines  and  projects  in 
18  countries  in  North  and  South  America, 
Africa,  Papua  New  Guinea  and  Saudi 
Arabia.  Our  portfolio  spans 
the  world’s 
most  prolific  gold  and  copper  districts  and 
is  focused  on  high-margin,  long-life  assets.   
Our  highly  diversified  workforce  is  drawn 
almost  entirely  from  our  host  nations  and 
equipped with world-class skills.

Our purpose

We  are  building  the  world’s  most  valued 
gold  and  copper  company  by  owning  the 
best  assets,  managed  by  the  best  people  to 
deliver the best returns and benefits to all our 
stakeholders.

Our strategy

We  plan  for  the  long  term  and  continuously 
invest  in  sustainable  growth,  with  resource-
based  plans  for  all  our  mines  and  worldwide 
exploration  programs  designed  to  deliver  a 
steady stream of new business opportunities.  
We  partner  with  our  stakeholders  to  achieve 
the best outcomes.

004

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationOur global business

Donlin Gold (50%)

Nevada Gold Mines1  (61.5% )

Tongon (89.7%)

Golden Sunlight  (100%)

Loulo-Gounkoto1  (80%)

Hemlo  (100%)

Jabal Sayid (50%)

Corporate office, 
Toronto

Pueblo Viejo1  (60%)

Fourmile (100%)

Pierina  (100%)

Zaldívar  (50%)

Norte Abierto (50%)

Alturas  (100%)

Porgera (47.5%)

Kibali1  (45%)

North Mara (84%)

Pascua-Lama (100%)

Bulyanhulu (84%)

Buzwagi (84%)

Veladero (50%)

Lumwana (100%)

  Gold producing

  Projects

  Copper producing

  In closure

  Care and maintenance

  Corporate office

A  world-class  company  needs  an  expanding  global  presence  in  order  to  bring  fresh 
opportunities within its grasp and to balance its geographic risks.  Long well-established 
in  the  major  goldfields  of  Africa  and  the  Americas,  we  have  lately  been  extending  our 
presence  into  the  geological  hunting  fields  of  the  Nubian  Shield  in  the  Middle  East,  
the El Indio Belt in South America and the prospective regions of the Pacific Rim.

1 

 Tier One mine.

005

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Why invest in Barrick?

Best asset base

Largest portfolio of best in class Tier Onei gold 
assets  and  producing  copper  mines  that  is 
unmatched  in  the  industry,  with  several  more 
waiting in the wings.

Longest pipeline

We have a long record of exploration success 
and  we  constantly  feed  new  targets  and 
projects  into  the  pipeline  that  will  support 
our  future  growth.    Our  exploration  drive 
is  extending  its  reach  and  broadening  our 
horizons into new prospective regions.

Replenished reserves

Uniquely in an industry running out of resources, 
we  continue  to  replace  the  ounces  we  mine 
with  reserves  of  at  least  the  same  quality 
through  extensive  brownfields  exploration 
around  our  existing  operations.  This  not  only 
preserves  our  asset  base  but  lengthens  the 
lives of these mines.

Robust balance sheet

The free cash flowi generated by our operations 
has delivered a balance sheet unburdened by 
debt and with a substantial cash component, 
freeing us to invest in growth projects and new 
prospects.

Clear runway

All  our  mines  have  10-year  business  plans  –  in 
some cases being rolled out to 15 and 20 years –  
which  are  firmly  anchored  in  demonstrable 
geological, engineering and commercial reality.

006

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationBuilding our future

Barrick  plans  for  the  long  term  and  our  cash-generating  capacity  enables  us  to  invest 
in the discovery of new opportunities as well as the enhancement and extension of our 
existing assets — all in support of our commitment to sustainable profitability.  The past 
year again provided proof of this strategy’s effectiveness, as these case studies, included 
elsewhere in this report, attest.

Unlocking  
Nevada’s potential

Page 025

Transforming  
Pueblo Viejo

Page 029

Resurrecting 
Bulyanhulu

Page 033

Replenishing  
our reserves 

Page 035

Advancing to  
net zero 

Page 046

007

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Letter from the 
Executive Chairman

By any measure one applies – returns to shareholders, strength 
of  balance  sheet,  peerless  assets,  prospect  pipeline  –  Barrick 
has been transformed across all aspects of the business and has 
again  delivered  a  strong  performance,  exceeding  expectations 
with  gold  and  copper  production  within  guidance  for  the  third 
year in succession.

It  is  worth  noting  that  at  the  time  of  the  Randgold  merger 
announcement  in  September  2018  (the  “Merger”),  Barrick  had 
a net debt burden in excess of $4 billion.  Since then, it has not 
only moved into a net cash position, but has returned $2.5 billion 
of cash to shareholders, including last year’s record distribution 
of $1.4 billion.
After  careful  consideration  of  our  capital  allocation,  the  Board 
has  settled  on  a  new  dividend  policy  of  a  base  dividend  with 
an  additional  performance  dividend  linked  to  the  net  cash  on 
the  balance  sheet  starting  in  20221.    We  believe  this  will  give 
shareholders  guidance  on  future  dividend  streams.    The  Board 
has  also  approved  a  $1  billion  share  buyback  plan2  which  will 
afford  us  the  opportunity  to  acquire  our  shares  when  they  are 
trading below what we consider to be their intrinsic value.

 „ It is disappointing that neither Barrick’s robust performance 
nor  its  outstanding  prospects  are  currently  recognized  in 
Barrick’s share price, particularly as the company’s investment 
thesis is so compelling.  Barrick is built on a foundation of six 
Tier One gold mines with rolling 10-year plans, providing a 
stable and sustainable production profile, delivering a robust 
business capable of generating substantial cash flow for the 
next decade and beyond.

 „ We  have  one  of  the  strongest  balance  sheets  in  the  gold 

mining sector. 

 „ Barrick has a distinctive partnership culture, both within the 
company’s  management  structure  and  in  our  relationships 
with external partners.  Our ownership culture is deep and 
broad across the organization and reinforces the importance 
we place on creating long-term value for our stakeholders, 
now and into the future. 

 „ We  continue  to  deliver  peer-leading  returns  to  shareholders 

based on our dividend and capital returns policy.

 „ Our  rigorous  focus  on  performance  and  execution  against 
our sustainability strategy enables us to develop and maintain 
trusted long-term partnerships with all our stakeholders and 
host  countries.    In  an  industry  first,  we  published  an  open 
and  honest  assessment  of  our  actions  in  the  form  of  a 
scorecard  in  our  Sustainability  Report  for  2019.    The  third 
of  these  scorecards  will  appear  in  the  2021  Sustainability 
Report,  scheduled  for  publication  in  the  second  quarter 
of  2022.    Like  its  predecessors  it  will  objectively  track  our 
progress  against  key  metrics  and  highlight  areas  which 
still  require  improvement,  providing  stakeholders  with  a 
valuable  insight  into  this  important  part  of  our  business  as 
well as demonstrating Barrick's embedded commitment to 
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) leadership. 

Three  years  after  Barrick  started 
on  its  new  journey,  the  company 
its  goal  of 
is  clearly  achieving 
industry-leading  value  creation 
and sustainable profitability, as the 
results for 2021 show.  

1 

2 

 The  declaration  and  payment  of  dividends  is  at  the  discretion  of  the 
Board  of  Directors,  and  will  depend  on  the  company’s  financial  results, 
cash requirements, future prospects, the number of outstanding common 
shares, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.
 The actual number of common shares that may be purchased, if any, and 
the  timing  of  any  such  purchases,  will  be  determined  by  Barrick  based 
on  a  number  of  factors,  including  the  company’s  financial  performance, 
the availability of cash flows, and the consideration of other uses of cash, 
including  capital  investment  opportunities,  returns  to  shareholders,  and 
debt reduction.

008

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation „ Our clean energy strategy is based on science and designed to 

ensure we remain sustainably profitable.

 „ We  are  maintaining  our  exceptional  record  of  exploration 
success, last year replacing the reserves we mined at a better 
grade  and  identifying  many  opportunities  for  new  brownfield 
and greenfield discoveries.

 „ Barrick  has  an  industry-leading  project  portfolio  and  only 
pursues growth opportunities that meet our investment criteria.

Financial discipline and a commitment to very specific investment 
filters,  along  with  a  clear  strategic  vision,  have  delivered  the 
Barrick of today.  It is not about the short term but about being 
sustainably profitable while building an integrated, modern mining 
business which will benefit all stakeholders and be acceptable to 
future generations.

To  achieve  this,  we  need  not  only  to  replace  and  grow  our 
reserves but also to attract and nurture the best people to manage 
our  best-in-class  assets.    We  continue  to  invest  in  sourcing, 
recruiting and developing this talent and we promote an inclusive, 
agile,  accountable  culture  of  ownership.    Our  policy  of  giving 
preference to host country nationals – who account for 96% of all  
employees  –  has  created  a  multi-cultural,  multi-generational 
workforce,  whose  natural  diversity  is  uniquely  aligned  to  the 
demands of a changing world.

It  is  also  essential  to  remain  at  the  forefront  of  technological 
innovation and the continuing development of our digital strategy 
has  provided  an  integrated  database  and  vertical  connectivity 
across  the  group.    Real-time  information  and  analysis  give 
much quicker insight into our key cost drivers and increase the 
potential  for  efficiency  analysis,  benchmarking  and  other  value-
added  reporting.    Continuing  investment  in  new  technology  is 
also  keeping  Barrick’s  mines  abreast  of  new  developments  in 
automated mining.

The persistence of the Covid-19 pandemic continued to present 
a host of challenges to governments and businesses throughout 
2021.  Barrick again figured prominently in the campaign against 
the virus in our host communities, effectively mitigating its impact 
on  our  operations  and  also  providing  vital  support  to  our  local 
stakeholders.

This was not done as a once-off response to a crisis but as part 
of  our  commitment  to  partnership-based  business  objectives, 
a  philosophy  built  on  engagement,  transparency  and  caring, 
which  recognizes  the  importance  of  the  shareholders  who  own 
the company but also of our other stakeholders: our employees, 
our host countries, the communities around our mines  and our 
business  partners.    Integral  to  this  philosophy  is  our  belief  that 
good  ESG  management  is  essential  to  the  achievement  of  our 
vision of being the world’s most valued gold and copper company.

PERFORMANCE DIVIDEND POLICY
Performance  
dividend level Threshold level
Level I
Level II

Net cash3 less than $0
Net cash greater than $0 and less than $0.5 billion
Net cash greater than $0.5 billion and less  
than $1 billion
Net cash greater than $1 billion

Level III
Level IV

3 

 Calculated as cash less debt.

LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN  (CONTINUED)

While much has been achieved over the past three years, there is 
still a great deal to be done.  We have set out 10-year business 
plans for all the operations to guide our management teams on 
the  road  ahead  and  to  provide  investors  with  insight  into  their 
performance.    I  thank  Mark  Bristow  and  his  team  for  the  great 
progress they have already made and have every confidence in 
their ability to continue to deliver.

I also thank my fellow directors on the Board of Barrick as well as 
the members  of the International Advisory Board for  their  close 
engagement with the company and their discerning advice that 
ensured  our  adherence  to  the  highest  standards  of  corporate 
governance.

We  appointed  our  third  female  director  last  year:  Helen  Cai,  a 
highly  experienced  finance  and  investment  professional  with 
long  experience  in  equity  markets.    She  brings  to  the  Board 
a  deep  understanding  of  China,  which  is  a  leading  producer 
and  consumer  of  gold  as  well  as  the  biggest  driver  of  copper 
demand, and will enhance our existing partnerships with Chinese 
companies.  She will also provide us with a distinct competitive 
advantage  elsewhere  as  we  continue  to  compete  for  Tier  One 
assets globally.

On behalf of the Board, I thank you for your support in 2021.  We 
look forward to continuing our partnership in the coming years.

John L Thornton
Executive Chairman

SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTION

Cents per share

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2016

2017
Base dividend

2018

2019

2020

2021

Return of capital

Quarterly  
base dividend
$0.10 per share
$0.10 per share

Quarterly  
performance dividend
$0.00 per share
$0.05 per share

Quarterly 
total dividend
$0.10 per share
$0.15 per share

$0.10 per share
$0.10 per share

$0.10 per share
$0.15 per share

$0.20 per share
$0.25 per share

009

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Board of Directors

Director since February 2012
Nationality: American 

Mr Thornton has been Executive 
Chairman of Barrick since 2014. 
He has decades of experience in 
global business, finance, and public 
affairs.  He has served as a director 
of numerous public companies, 
including China Unicom, Ford, HSBC, 
Industrial and Commercial Bank of 
China, Intel, and News Corporation.

Director since December 2005
Nationality: American 

Chair of the Audit & Risk 
Committee, Audit Committee 
Financial Expert
Member of the Compensation 
Committee

Mr Harvey was CONSOL Energy 
Inc’s Chairman Emeritus from May 
2016 to May 2017, Chairman from 
January 2015 to May 2016, Executive 
Chairman from May 2014 to January 
2015, Chairman and CEO from June 
2010 to May 2014, and CEO from 
January 1998 to June 2010.

Director since January 2019
Nationality: South African 

Mr Bristow had been the Chief 
Executive of Randgold Resources since 
its incorporation in 1995. Randgold 
was founded on his pioneering 
exploration work in West Africa and he 
subsequently led the company’s growth 
through the discovery and development 
of world-class assets.  He joined Barrick 
in his current position with the Merger in 
January 2019.

Director since November 2021
Nationality: Chinese

Ms Cai has almost two decades of 
experience in finance and investment. 
She was an equity research analyst 
with Goldman Sachs covering the 
American mining and technology 
sectors.  Then, at China International 
Capital Corporation, she was a lead 
analyst covering the greater China 
region, and later as a senior investment 
banker headed various IPO, 
restructuring, and M&A transactions.

Director since September 2003
Nationality: Venezuelan and 
Spanish

Chair of the ESG & Nominating 
Committee
Member of the Compensation 
Committee

Mr Cisneros is the Chairman of 
Cisneros, a privately-held media, 
entertainment, telecommunications, 
and consumer products organization. 
He is a member of Barrick’s 
International Advisory Board. He is 
also a senior advisor to RRE Ventures 
LLC, a venture capital firm.

Director since January 2019
Nationality: British 

Chair of the Compensation 
Committee 
Member of the ESG & Nominating 
Committee

Mr Coleman is the group head of 
banking at Rothschild & Co and has 
more than 25 years’ experience in 
the financial services sector, including 
corporate and private client banking 
and project finance.  He has had 
a long-standing involvement in the 
mining sector in Africa and globally.

Mark Bristow 
NON-INDEPENDENT, 
PRESIDENT AND 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE 
OFFICER

Helen Cai
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

Christopher L Coleman
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

John L Thornton 
NON-INDEPENDENT, 
EXECUTIVE 
CHAIRMAN

J Brett Harvey
INDEPENDENT AND 
LEAD DIRECTOR

Gustavo A Cisneros 
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

010

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation 
 
BOARD OF DIRECTORS  (CONTINUED)

Director since July 2014
Nationality: Canadian

Member of the Audit & Risk 
Committee, Audit Committee 
Financial Expert

Mr Evans is the President of Alibaba 
Group Holding Ltd, a position he 
has held since August 2015.  Prior 
to becoming President, he was an 
independent director and member of 
the audit committee of Alibaba Group 
Holding Ltd.

Director since November 2020
Nationality: Ugandan 

Member of the Audit & Risk 
Committee

Ms Kabagambe has 35 years’ 
experience spanning a diverse range 
of senior leadership positions in 
international institutions. She is a former 
Executive Director of the World Bank 
Group and, prior to the World Bank, 
she spent 27 years at the African 
Development Bank.  Ms Kabagambe 
has also served on the boards of the 
Africa American Institute and Junior 
Achievement Africa.

Director since August 2019
Nationality: Chilean 

Member of the ESG & Nominating 
Committee

Ms Silva serves as a partner at the 
Chilean law firm Bofill Escobar Silva 
Abogados.  She is also a member 
of the board of Aguas Andinas, the 
largest water utility in Chile.  In 2010, 
Ms Silva was appointed Vice Minister 
of Public Works.  Ms Silva became the 
Minister of Public Works at the end of 
2012, a position she held until March 
2014.  She has been named one of 
Chile’s 100 top woman leaders on four 
occasions.

J Michael Evans
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

Anne Kabagambe
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

Loreto Silva
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

Director since July 2014
Nationality: American 

Member of the ESG & Nominating 
Committee 
Member of the Compensation 
Committee

Mr Greenspun is the Publisher and 
Editor of the Las Vegas Sun. He is 
also Chairman and CEO of Greenspun 
Media Group. He has been appointed 
to two US Presidential Commissions.

Brian L Greenspun
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

Director since January 2019
Nationality: British

Member of the Audit & Risk 
Committee

For 15 years, prior to his retirement in 
2011, Mr Quinn was head of Mining 
Investment Banking for Europe and 
Africa at CIBC.  He has over 40 years’ 
experience in the mining industry.

Andrew J Quinn
INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR

011

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Message from the 
President and CEO

We continued to invest in our future through the development 
of capital projects that will expand and enhance an operating 
platform  which  already  holds  some  of  the  industry’s  best 
assets.    Our  exploration  programs  more  than  replenished 
that base while also broadening our horizons by finding fresh 
targets in new regions.  We sharpened our skills and nurtured a 
new generation of leaders.  We mapped out and are advanced 
on a clear road to achievable emissions reduction targets.  We 
strengthened the many stakeholder partnerships that secure 
our social licence to operate in our host countries across the 
world.

The  creation  of  long-term  value,  which  is  Barrick’s  prime 
objective, requires a sustainable strategy.  Our operations all 
have business plans for the next 10 years and beyond – plans 
based not on wishful thinking but on geological, engineering 
and  commercial  realities.    Deeply  embedded  in  those  plans 
is  our  long-standing  commitment  to  the  principles  of  ESG, 
which informs all our business decisions.

Building on our value foundation
In  Nevada,  the  updated  Goldrush  feasibility  study  delivered 
a  robust  project  that  meets  our  investment  criteria  and 
the  immediate  geological  prospectivity  has  the  potential 
to  enhance  it  with  further  evaluation.    The  commissioning 
of  Turquoise  Ridge’s  third  shaft  and  continued  geological 
and  mine  improvements  will  secure  that  mine’s  future  as  a 
Tier One asset.  The state is one of the world’s most prolific 
gold  districts  and  last  year  alone  brownfields  exploration 
added  9.4  million  ounces  of  reservesi.    Mineral  resources, 
inclusive  of  reserves,  also  demonstrated  good  growth  with 
7.4 million ounces of measured and indicated resourcesi and 
a  further  5.2  million  ounces  of  inferred  resourcesi  to  Nevada 
Gold Mines’ inventory, before depletion.  There is also a real 
potential for the discovery of new world-class deposits.

Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic – another of our Tier One 
assets – is making good progress with its plant expansion and 
mine life extension project, designed to deliver a mine capable 
of producing 800,000 ounces of gold per year on a 100% basis, 
well into the 2040s.  Work on the plant is well advanced and the 
new tailings facility is at the permitting stage.

In  Africa,  the  Tier  One  Loulo-Gounkoto  is  ramping  up  
production  at  its  third  underground  mine  while  exploration 
successes  continues  to  extend  the  life  of  the  complex.  
Kibali,  also  a  member  of  the  Tier  One  club,  is  discovering 
new  orebodies  within  the  main  mining  area.    North  Mara 
and  Bulyanhulu,  both  stagnant  when  we  took  over  their 
management 
transformed  beyond 
recognition,  and  last  year’s  combined  production  of  over 
500,000  ounces  of  gold  meets  one  of  our  key  criteria  for  a 
Tier One complex.

in  2019,  have  been 

The  past  year  was  one  of 
substantial  progress  in  our  drive 
to  build  a  Barrick  which  will  be 
the  world’s  most  valued  gold  and 
copper  mining  company  in  every 
sense of that word. 

012

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationMESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO  (CONTINUED)

Veladero  in  Argentina  is  another  success  story.    A  doubtful 
starter  at  the  time  of  the  Merger,  it  has  been  turned  into  a 
strong  performer,  and  the  commissioning  of  its  link  to  the 
power grid in neighbouring Chile will reduce its costs as well 
as its carbon emissions.

We have put a particularly strong focus on exploration in Latin 
America, where our teams are testing a portfolio of targets on 
the El Indio belt along the border between Argentina and Chile.  
We have also added ground in Peru and started fieldwork on 
new projects in Guyana and Suriname.

In  Papua  New  Guinea,  the  Porgera  mine  has  been  on  care 
and maintenance since the government chose not to renew its 
special mining licence.  Negotiations led by the prime minister 
and  me  eventually  delivered  a  framework  agreement  for  the 
resumption  of  operations  but  finalizing  the  fine  print  is  also 
requiring perseverance.  We nevertheless hope that it will be 
possible to restart the mine this July.

Barrick has an industry-leading record of reserve and resource 
replacement, and last year we again found more ounces than 
we mined, and at a better grade.  Our portfolio of advanced 
targets  will  continue  to  add  to  our  inventory,  providing  solid 
support for our 10-year production forecast.

New frontiers 
We  are  increasing  our  global  footprint  as  the  hunt  for  high-
quality  assets  extends 
into  new  prospective  areas.  A 
specialist  Asia-Pacific  team,  set  up  to  look  at  opportunities 
in that region, has acquired exploration permits in Japan and 
we  are  also  investigating  projects  across  the  Nubian  and 
Arabian Shields in North Africa and the Middle East.  In Egypt, 
a draft mineral exploitation permit has been received from the 
Egyptian  government  and  negotiations  have  started  on  its 
fiscal parameters.

We are working on a well-defined strategy to grow our business 
in Canada where I believe we are under-invested.  A significant 
exploration  portfolio  has  been  secured  in  the  country’s  Uchi 
Belt and the team is also looking at other opportunities in the 
country.

We  are  investigating  the  revival  of  the  Reko  Diq  project  in 
Pakistan, which sits on top of the world’s largest undeveloped 
copper  and  gold  deposit.    This  project  stalled  when  the 
provincial government refused to grant it a mining licence.  An 
arbitration  court  subsequently  awarded  our  partners  and  us 
significant  damages.    Instead  of  enforcing  this,  however,  we 
have been working with the federal and provincial governments 
in a spirit of partnership on an agreement that will support the 
legalization of the lease and development of the project. 

The S in ESG
The Social component of ESG tends to be overshadowed by 
its  Environmental  counterpart,  but  for  Barrick  it  is  the  socio-
economic  state  of  our  less-developed  host  countries  that  is 
critically  important,  and  much  of  our  sustainability  strategy 
is  directed  at  ensuring  that  our  host  communities  are  not 
impacted  negatively  by  the  world’s  transition  to  a  green 
economy.

CUMULATIVE ATTRIBUTABLE FREE CASH FLOW1,i,ii FROM OPERATING MINES (2022 – 2026)

 For every $100/oz change in the gold price, attributable free cash flow1,i  
generated by our operations increases by ~$1.5 billion.
 For every $0.50/lb change in the copper price, attributable free cash flow1,i 
generated by our operations increases by ~$0.8 billion.

i s   m a g n i fi e d   b y   o w n i n g   s i x   T i e r   O n e   g o l d   a s s e t s

l e v e r a g e  

O u r   p r i c e  

$ billion

25

20

15

10

5

00

$1,200/oz
$3.00/lb

$1,300/oz
$3.25/lb

$1,400/oz
$3.50/lb

$1,500/oz
$3.75/lb

$1,600/oz
$4.00/lb

$1,700/oz
$4.25/lb

$1,800/oz
$4.50/lb

$1,900/oz
$4.75/lb

$2,000/oz
$5.00/lb

Tier One gold assets

Other gold assets

Copper assets 

1 

 On  an  attributable  basis;  excludes  corporate-level  costs  such  as  interest,  exploration,  evaluation  and  project,  G&A  as  well  as  closure  (average  of 
$0.9 billion per annum). Exclusive of Porgera.

013

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 
 
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO  (CONTINUED)

Our sustainability team has been collecting and analyzing the 
socio-economic  data  from  surveys  undertaken  to  quantify 
the  benefits  of  our  support  for  communities’  livelihood 
improvement  initiatives.    These  findings  will  be  included  in 
our  Sustainability  Report  for  2021  and  these  non-monetary 
metrics will be an industry first.

Throughout  the  year  we  tracked  our  progress  against  the 
Sustainability Scorecard at least quarterly.  The main motivation 
for the scorecard – another industry first, introduced in 2019 – is  
to  external  stakeholders 
to  disclose  our  performance 
transparently while driving internal improvement at a site level.

For  the  14th  successive  year,  Barrick  was  included  in  the 
prestigious  Dow  Jones  Sustainability  Index’s  World  Index, 
placing in the 95th percentile of all the mining companies listed.  
We  scored  full  marks  for  environmental  reporting,  water-
related  risks,  social  reporting,  human  rights  and  economic 
contribution.

Last year we also quantified and published a greenhouse gas 
reduction roadmap to our target of a 30% reduction by 2030 
against a 2018 baseline, while maintaining a steady production 
profile.  This was lauded by investors and stakeholders as a 
promise with a plan: in other words, a realistically achievable 
goal  and  not  merely  a  hopeful  pledge  to  please  the  market.  
In  the  meantime,  some  of  our  reduction  initiatives,  such  as 
Nevada’s  200MW  solar  power  plant,  have  made  significant 
progress. 

Investing in our human capital
One  of  our  key  ESG  contributions  is  Barrick’s  policy  of 
local  employment:  96%  of  our  workforce  and  78%  of  our 
management are host country nationals.  

This  natural  diversity  gives  Barrick  an  unparalleled  ability  to 
understand  and  align  with  the  social  and  cultural  norms  of 
its  operational  environments  and  effectively  manage  any 
challenges that might arise.

Our  drive  to  employ  the  next  generation  of  mining  talent 
remains  steady,  with  56%  of  our  workforce  now  under  the 
age of 40 and 19% under 30.  We are continuing to increase 
our gender diversity, and last year 17% of new hires globally 
were  women.    Christine  Keener,  formerly  vice-president  of 
operations  for  Europe  and  North  America  at  Alcoa,  has 
been  appointed  as  our  new  chief  operating  officer  for  North 
America  and  Poupak  Bahamin  will  replace  Rich  Haddock  in 
the role of General Counsel in April 2022.  Running parallel to 
our  recruiting  drive  are  individual  development  plans  tailored 
specifically for women.

Effective succession planning is a key human capital objective 
and high-potential leaders identified through this process are 
enrolled in executive and management development courses.

As  part  of  our  employee  development  programs,  we  have 
developed  a  new  Subject  Matter  Expert  (SME)  approach  to 
stretch our key technical talent.  These SMEs are equipped to 
deal with operational challenges in real time and form part of 
our global best practice teams.

Barrick  believes  in  empowering  our  people  to  thrive  in  a 
decentralized structure with lean regional teams designed for 
agility.    We  have  two-way  communication  and  engagement 
with  employees    and  our  mantra  is  management  by  walking 
about.    Core  executives  are  physically  in  the  regions  for 
most  of  each  quarter,  driving  key  initiatives  and  assessing 
organizational capability.  I personally spend most of my time 
working at our mines and projects around the world.

014

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationRolling  out  a  single  groupwide  data 
platform
After  the  Merger  and  the  Newmont  joint  venture  in  Nevada, 
Barrick was left with more than 20 separate financial planning, 
transacting  and  reporting  systems.    Drastically  simplifying 
these  and  integrating  them  into  a  single,  integrated  platform 
for  all  financial  data  and  operational  KPIs  was  consequently 
one of our key priorities.

Towards  the  end  of  2021,  Barrick  passed  another  major 
milestone in its digital transformation journey, when all its sites 
in the Americas and Africa moved on to a single SAP solution, 
one  of  three  layered  applications  that  will  constitute  the 
group’s data platform.  In addition to SAP (transactions), the 
others  are  OneStream  (financial  reporting  and  consolidation) 
and Xeras (operating cost modelling).

This integrated knowledge platform will give Barrick the ability 
to  convert  updated  mine  plans  into  financial  models  and  roll 
them  up  into  a  consolidated  group  view,  all  in  a  matter  of 
minutes.  It can also quickly compare the financial viability of 
multiple mining scenarios and measure key cost drivers in real 
time, flagging issues that require immediate attention.

The  new  platform  has  significantly  improved  not  only  the 
availability but also the accuracy of our information, providing 
a  robust  foundation  for  our  continuing  investment  in  new 
projects.

10-YEAR GOLD PRODUCTION OUTLOOKii

MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO  (CONTINUED)

Now for the next step 
Barrick’s  strong  balance  sheet  and  the  abundant  free  cash 
flowi  generated  by  our  operations  will  enable  us  to  continue 
building our future by investing in the development of the many 
growth prospects within the group as well as the acquisition 
of the rare external opportunities that may meet our criteria.

Last  year  we  again  demonstrated  the  effectiveness  of  our 
strategy  of  combining  the  best  assets  with  the  best  people 
to deliver the best results.  Barrick demonstrably has the best 
assets  and  it  is  producing  industry-leading  returns,  thanks 
to  the  teams  who  worked  tirelessly  to  achieve  2021’s  stellar 
results.    Led  by  the  group  executive,  they  are  focused  on 
taking us to the next level.

The executive chairman and the Board provided the guidance 
and  governance  we  need  on  this  journey,  and  I  thank  them 
for  their  support.    I  also  thank  the  many  stakeholders  and 
business associates with whom we enjoy mutually rewarding 
partnerships.

Mark Bristow
President and Chief Executive

Moz

6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

North America

Latin America and Asia Pacific2

Africa and Middle East

GEO2,3

Production excludes Porgera.

2 
3  Gold Equivalent Ounces (GEO) are calculated using reserve prices – $1,200/oz for gold and $2.75/lb for copper.

015

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Executive committee

Mark Bristow 
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE 
OFFICER 

Mark Bristow was appointed President and 
Chief Executive Officer of Barrick in January 
2019, following the Merger with Randgold 
Resources.  Previously he founded Randgold 
Resources and was the CEO following his 
pioneering exploration work in West Africa.  
He subsequently led Randgold’s growth 
through the discovery and development of 
high-quality assets into a major international 
gold mining business.  He played a pivotal 
role in promoting the emergence of a 
sustainable mining industry in Africa, and 
has a proven track record of delivering 
significant shareholder value.  He holds a 
Doctorate in Geology from the University of 
KwaZulu-Natal.

Mark Hill  
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER,  
LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC 

Mark Hill is the executive responsible 
for the Latin America and Asia Pacific 
region, a role he assumed in January 
2019.  He was formerly Chief Investment 
Officer of Barrick, chairing its investment 
committee and has more than 27 years’ 
experience in the mining industry.

Christine Keener 
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER,  
NORTH AMERICA 

Christine  Keener is the executive 
responsible for the North America region 
and was appointed in February 2022.  She 
brings a diversified background having 
worked in finance, strategy, a number 
of commercial roles and more recently 
in operations.  Christine was formerly 
vice president of operations, Europe and 
North America, for Alcoa and before that 
worked as a certified public accountant for 
PricewaterhouseCoopers.  

Graham Shuttleworth 
SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT, 
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

Graham Shuttleworth is a chartered 
accountant with over 27 years’ mining 
industry experience.  Previously, he was 
the Financial Director and Chief Financial 
Officer of Randgold from July 2007, and 
prior to that the managing director and 
head of metals and mining for the Americas 
in the global investment banking division of 
HSBC.  He became the Senior Executive 
Vice-President and CFO of Barrick with the 
Merger in January 2019.

Kevin Thomson  
SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT, 
STRATEGIC MATTERS 

Kevin Thomson is intimately involved in 
all activities of strategic significance to 
the company, including the development 
of partnerships with other mining 
companies, investors, suppliers and other 
business partners, strategic legal issues, 
management of complex negotiations, as 
well as development of corporate strategy 
and governance.

Willem Jacobs 
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AFRICA 
AND MIDDLE EAST 

Willem Jacobs is the executive 
responsible for the Africa and Middle 
East region.  He joined Randgold in 2010 
and was responsible for establishing 
Randgold’s activities in Central and East 
Africa, specifically in the Democratic 
Republic of Congo.  Willem was 
appointed COO, Africa and Middle East 
after the Merger in January 2019.

Greg Walker 
EXECUTIVE MANAGING DIRECTOR, 
NEVADA GOLD MINES  

Greg Walker has been in his current position 
since the Nevada Gold Mines JV was 
formed in July 2019.  Prior to leading NGM, 
he was Barrick’s SVP, Operational and 
Technical Excellence, responsible for driving 
transformational business improvement 
across the group’s operations.

016

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationEXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (CONTINUED)

Lois Wark 
GROUP CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS 
AND INVESTOR RELATIONS EXECUTIVE 

Lois Wark joined Randgold when the 
company was established in 1995 and 
headed its corporate communications 
function for 20 years.  In January 2019, 
following the Merger, she assumed 
responsibility as executive in charge of 
Barrick’s global corporate communications 
and investor relations programs.

Grant Beringer 
GROUP SUSTAINABILITY EXECUTIVE 

Grant Beringer oversees all sustainability 
related aspects for the company and is a 
member of the Environmental and Social 
Oversight Committee.  He holds an MSc in 
environmental management and has over 
18 years’ experience in the environmental 
and social consulting industry.

Rod Quick 
MINERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND 
EVALUATION EXECUTIVE 

Rod Quick is a geologist with an MSc and 
26 years’ experience in the gold mining 
industry.  He joined Randgold in 1996, and 
was involved in the exploration, evaluation 
and production phases of all of Randgold’s 
projects since Morila.  Rod was appointed to 
his current position following the Merger in 
January 2019.

John Steele 
METALLURGY, ENGINEERING AND 
CAPITAL PROJECTS EXECUTIVE 

John Steele is the executive responsible for 
capital projects and provides operational and 
engineering oversight to the group, a role he 
assumed following the Merger in January 
2019.  He joined Randgold in 1996 and was 
responsible for the successful construction 
and commissioning of Randgold’s Morila, 
Loulo, Tongon, Gounkoto and Kibali mines.

Joel Holliday
EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT, 
EXPLORATION

Joel Holliday joined Barrick as SVP for Global 
Exploration following the Merger in 2019.  
Previously he had managed Randgold’s 
exploration teams for 15 years with 
discoveries including Gounkoto and Loulo 3.  
Joel assumed his current role in November 
2021.

Riaan Grobler 
COMMERCIAL AND SUPPLY CHAIN 
EXECUTIVE 

Riaan Grobler holds an Honours degree in 
Finance and has 23 years’ experience in 
the gold mining industry.  He was appointed 
Group Commercial and Supply Chain 
General Manager for Randgold in 2014 
and SVP Commercial and Supply Chain for 
Barrick following the Merger in January 2019.  
In 2021, Riaan was appointed Commercial 
and Supply Chain Executive.

Glenn Heard 
MINING EXECUTIVE 

Glenn Heard is a mining engineer with a 
Bachelor of Engineering (Mining) Honours 
and over 29 years’ mining experience.  In 
2017, he was appointed Randgold's Group 
General Manager – Mining and then SVP 
Mining following the Merger in January 
2019.  In 2021, Glenn was appointed 
Mining Executive responsible for technical 
and operational oversight.

Darian Rich 
HUMAN RESOURCES EXECUTIVE 

Darian Rich, who has more than 27 years’ 
experience in human resource management, 
was appointed Executive Vice-President, 
Talent Management, in July 2014, when he 
was tasked with attracting, retaining and 
developing exceptional people.

Poupak Bahamin 
GENERAL COUNSEL

Poupak Bahamin joined Barrick in 2020 as 
deputy general counsel.  Previously, she 
served as a partner and Co-Head of Mining 
US at Norton Rose Fulbright.  She has been 
recognized by Chambers Global as a DRC 
Foreign Expert for general business law as 
well as corporate and M&A work. 

017

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Financial review

The  quality  of  our  asset  base  and  the  agility  of  our 
management  were  demonstrated  by  our  ability  to  deliver  on 
full-year production guidance, despite the major mill failure at 
one  of  the  Carlin  processing  facilities  in  the  second  quarter.  
With  the  gold  price  maintaining  its  elevated  level,  delivery 
of  our  production  and  total  cash  costsi  within  guidance  was 
critical  to  maintaining  our  profitability  and  net  cash  position, 
and  underwrote  our  ability  to  return  a  record  $1.4  billion  to 
shareholders  in  the  form  of  dividends  and  return  of  capital.  
At  the  same  time  as  delivering  the  strong  results  in  2021, 
we  have  positioned  our  business  to  be  profitable  in  years  to 
come,  with  anticipated  growth  in  production  and  a  declining 
cost profile.

We  have  begun  to  see  the  impact  of  inflation.    Our  agile 
operating  model  shields  us  from  some  of  these  headwinds, 
particularly around our supply chain and labour costs.

This  is  also  supported  by  our  strong  financial  results  with 
operating cash flow of $4.4 billion in 2021 and free cash flow of 
$1.9 billioni.  For the second consecutive year, we have ended 
the  year  in  a  net  cash  position,  despite  the  record  returns 
to shareholders, and given that we do not have any material 
short-  or  medium-term  debt  commitments,  the  company’s 
balance  sheet  is  in  a  very  sound  position,  providing  us  with 
the  ability  to  invest  in  our  future  growth  and  continue  to 
deliver  returns  to  our  shareholders.    We  have  increased  our 
base dividend and introduced a performance dividend while at 
the same time approving a $1 billion share buyback program 
starting  in  2022.    The  performance  dividend  will  ensure  that 
our shareholders participate in the upside of higher commodity 
prices  while  at  the  same  time  giving  us  the  capacity  to  fund 
our  future  growth.    Our  dividend,  on  an  annual  basis,  has 
increased for the last five years in a row.

During 2021, the operating leverage Barrick has to the copper 
price and our ability to participate in the global decarbonization 
imperative became clearer.  Our copper business contributed 
around  20%  of  Barrick’s  bottom  line  during  the  year,  and 
we  expect  to  see  that  grow  in  the  future  as  we  develop  this 
portfolio.

We  are  very  near  the  end  of  our  systems  transformation 
journey that started almost two and half years ago.  We have 
completed  the  implementation  of  SAP  and  OneStream  at  all 
our operations throughout the Americas and Africa.  This has 
progressively  allowed  us  to  simplify  our  systems  landscape 
by  decommissioning  several  legacy  and  outdated  enterprise 
resource planning and reporting platforms.  That simplification 
has  also  been  supported  by  further  portfolio  rationalization 
through disposals of non-core assets, including the Lone Tree 
and South Arturo asset swap and Lagunas Norte divestiture.

Our  solid  performance  in  2021 
was  built  on  three  platforms:  the 
strength and resilience of our asset 
base;  the  increasing  contribution 
from  our  copper  business;  and 
the  first  fruits  of  our  systems 
investments in the future.  

018

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationWe  are  now  starting  to  realise  the  benefits  of  simplifying  the 
group  structure  in  the  form  of  lower  costs,  higher  operating 
efficiencies  and  enhanced  transparency  through  the  ability 
to  benchmark  our  operations.    We  have  adapted  our  supply 
chain model to minimize exposure to the biggest cost drivers 
while  at  the  same  time  fully  leveraging  our  buying  power 
across  the  group,  aided  by  our  new  SAP  supply  chain  and 
planned maintenance implementations.

Identifying and effectively dealing with risk is key to a safe and 
sustainable business and is an integral part of how we protect 
and create value.  Our risk management process is designed to 
enable us to identify, evaluate, plan and manage risks, including 
new  and  emerging  risks  that  could  have  an  impact  on  our 
business.  During the year, we carried out a robust assessment 
of  these  risks,  uncertainties  and  emerging  risks  facing  the 
group.  We also proactively analyzed the impact of these risks 
through scenarios linked to the interplay between geopolitics, 
societal expectations and technology advancement. 

BARRICK 5-YEAR GOLD OUTLOOK1,ii

Gold & GEO production (attributable), Moz
Total gold capital expendituresi (attributable), $ million

6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0

1 
2 

3 

FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

While  the  previous  two  years  have  been  largely  focused 
on  business  transformation  and  building  our  geological 
understanding and 10-year plan in 2021, we started delivering 
on our foundational purpose.  We continue to be excited by the 
additional value that is within our grasp and we are pursuing 
the capture of this upside to achieve our goal of becoming the 
world’s most valued gold and copper mining company.

Graham Shuttleworth
Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer

Gold cost of sales2,i, Total cash costs2,i and AISC2,i, $/oz

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

LATAM and AP

AME
All metrics are exclusive of Porgera.
 Royalty expenses included in the per ounce cost metrics are based on a gold price assumption of $1,700/oz for 2022 onwards. Our realized gold 
price in 2021 was $1,790/ozi.
Gold Equivalent Ounces (GEO) are calculated using reserve prices – $1,200/oz for gold and $2.75/lb for copper.

Total gold capital

Total cash costs

Cost of sales

AISC

NA

GEO3

BARRICK 5-YEAR COPPER OUTLOOKii

Copper production (attributable), Mlbs
Total copper capital expendituresi (attributable), $ million

Copper cost of sales1,i, C1 cash costs1,i and AISC1,i, $/lb

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

1 

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Lumwana
Total copper capital
 Royalty expenses included in the per pound cost metrics are based on a copper price assumption of $4.00/lb for 2022 onwards. Our realized 
copper price in 2021 was $4.32/lbi.

C1 cash costs

Cost of sales

Jabal Sayid

Zaldivar

AISC

3.00

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

019

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Gold market overview

The  average  price  of  gold  in  2021 
was  $1,799/oz,  a  2%  increase  over 
the  $1,770/oz  average 
in  2020.  
$1,799/oz  represented  the  highest 
annual  average  price  on  record, 
the  previous  high 
surpassing 
reached  in  2020,  and  represented 
the  sixth  straight  year  of  annual 
average price increases.

2021  was  another  challenging  year  full  of  global  economic 
uncertainties,  but  the  strength  of  the  gold  price  during 
such  difficult  times  has  continued  to  underscore  its  value 
as  a  safe  haven  investment.    In  particular,  the  economic 
consequences  of  the  pandemic  have  led  to  monetary  and 
fiscal stimulus measures put in place by global central banks 
and  governments  that  have  helped  to  provide  a  conducive 
environment for historically robust gold price performance.  

Gold  prices  ended  2021  at  $1,806/oz,  above  the  annual 
average for the year, and have continued to be strong in the 
early months of 2022.

Overall demand for gold was strong in 2021, with the World 
Gold  Council  reporting  a  10%  increase  year-on-year,  led 
by  increases  in  the  jewellery  and  technology  sectors  and 
purchases by global central banks. 

Despite  the  increase  in  overall  demand,  investment  demand 
for  gold  in  2021  declined,  with  the  World  Gold  Council 
reporting  that  collective  ETF  gold  holdings  reduced  by 
173 tonnes during the year after record net inflows in the prior 
year.    COMEX  net  long  positions  also  declined  from  the  all-
time highs reached during 2020.  These investment demand 
decreases  were  partially  offset  by  strength  in  purchases  of 
bars and coins, which rose 31% versus 2020.  

Historically  low  global  nominal  interest  rates,  including  a 
benchmark  rate  range  of  0%  to  0.25%  in  the  United  States 
in  place  since  March  2020,  and  a  continuation  of  negative 
10-year  real  rates  in  the  US  and  Europe,  have  helped  gold 
prices  remain  strong  by  reducing  the  opportunity  cost  of 
holding gold over the past two years.  However, the expectation 
for increases in benchmark interest rates starting in 2022, and 
reductions  in  financial  and  monetary  stimulus  measures  that 
were put in place to reduce the economic risk associated with 
the  Covid-19  pandemic,  moderated  investment  demand  for 
gold in 2021.  Notwithstanding this, with tightening measures 
already anticipated, and the possibility of continued inflation, 
Q4  2021  represented  the  strongest  quarter  for  overall 
investment  demand  since  Q3  2020,  potentially  setting  the 
stage for a rebound in 2022.

There was a significant positive turnaround in global jewellery 
consumption  in  2021  due  to  a  stronger  economic  outlook 
after  purchases  were  significantly  impacted  by  Covid-19  in 
the prior year, with global consumption up 52% versus 2020.  
China  and  India,  representing  approximately  61%  of  global 
jewellery consumption demand on a combined basis, led the 
way and accounted for the bulk of the increase.  Versus the 
prior year, China’s consumption level was up 63% and India’s 
consumption level was up 93%.  

Gold  demand  for  electronics  and  other  industrial  uses  rose 
by  10%  in  2021,  after  declining  in  2020  due  to  reduced 
manufacturing activity and demand for electronics as a result 
of the spread of Covid-19.  A further return to pre-pandemic 
manufacturing  activity  and  a  continued  increase  in  demand 
for 5G infrastructure could help to grow demand in 2022 and 
beyond.

Central  bank  purchases  rose  82%  year-on-year,  but  still 
remained  below  the  long-term  peak  of  net  purchases  that 
were  made  in  2018  and  2019.    The  World  Gold  Council 
reports that central banks added 463 tonnes to their reserves 
during 2021, representing the twelfth consecutive year of net 
purchases.  During 2020, some central banks looked to their 
holdings  of  gold  as  a  source  of  liquidity  in  difficult  economic 
times as a result of the global pandemic – with their ability to 
do so providing a strong statement as to why gold is a valuable 
reserve asset and a key source of reserve diversification.  The 
strong increase year-on-year of net purchases in 2021 shows 
that central banks continue to view gold positively.

Overall supply of gold in 2021 decreased by 1%, the second 
straight  year  of  declines,  mainly  attributable  to  an  11%  drop 
in recycled gold tempered by a modest 2% increase in mine 
supply.  

The supply of recycled gold fell after reaching a nine-year high 
in the prior year that was attributable to the rise in prices and 
economic worries over the initial impacts of Covid-19.  

Global annual mine production rose for the first time in three 
years  but  still  remained  approximately  3%  below  the  peak 
reached  in  2018,  further  confirming  that  the  mining  industry 
may  have  reached  a  medium-term  peak  in  gold  production 
at  that  time.    As  gold  prices  have  increased  and  capital 
has  become  more  readily  available  in  recent  years,  there  is 
continued evidence of increased spending on exploration by 
mining  companies,  but  the  costs  of  mine  construction  and 
the  time  required  for  environmental  studies  and  permitting 
activities  before  reaching  the  production  stage  means  that  a 
return to sustained global production growth could be delayed 
accordingly.

020

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationGOLD ETFS & SIMILAR PRODUCTS 

Tonnes, net

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

-200

-400

-600

-800

-1,000

Year

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

GLOBAL ANNUAL GOLD MINE PRODUCTION 

Tonnes

4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

Year

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

OFFICIAL SECTOR NET PURCHASES AND 
GOLD PRICES

Tonnes, net

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

$/oz

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

GOLD MARKET OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)

Copper market 
overview

In 2021, the price of copper was historically strong, with average 
annual  prices  marking  an  all-time  high  of  $4.23/lb,  a  significant 
increase over the $2.80/lb annual average in 2020.

Early  in  the  pandemic  period,  copper  prices  were  negatively 
impacted by the global reduction in manufacturing and economic 
activity resulting from the spread of Covid-19, falling to a 4-year 
low of $1.98/lb in March 2020.  

Subsequently, copper prices recovered strongly and steadily over 
the remainder of 2020 and into 2021, reaching an all-time high of 
$4.87/lb in August 2021 due to an anticipated uptick in demand 
from increased manufacturing activity and a rebound in economic 
growth, low levels of global copper stockpiles, and constrained 
mine supply. 

As  anticipated,  China’s  GDP  growth  rate  recovered  strongly  in 
2021, to an annual level of 8.1%.  As China is by far the world’s 
largest consumer of copper, a return to a robust level of economic 
growth had a significant impact on copper demand, and the price 
of copper, during 2021.  

In  the  longer  run,  the  increase  in  the  volume  of  copper  that  is 
used  in  the  manufacture  of  electric  vehicles  versus  those  with 
combustion engines bodes well for copper demand, as electric 
vehicles  are  poised  to  comprise  a  growing  share  of  all  vehicles 
produced  over  the  next  decade.    Combined  with  the  copper 
that will be required to expand the electrical grids to support the 
anticipated  growth  in  usage  of  electric  vehicles,  the  outlook  for 
copper demand in the coming years remains very strong.

Since  the  turn  of  the  century,  as  the  global  economy  has 
undergone a number of significant challenges, the market prices 
of both gold and copper have each increased significantly, with 
copper  prices  experiencing  greater  volatility  and  gold  prices 
showing  more  consistent  strength.    Over  this  time  period,  gold 
and  copper  prices  have  both  outpaced  the  gains  of  the  S&P 
500 Total Return Index, demonstrating the long-term benefits of 
holding hard assets in an investment portfolio.

GOLD, COPPER, AND S&P 500 TOTAL RETURN 
INDEX SINCE 2000

%

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

Year

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

  Central banks and other institutions
  London Bullion Market Association gold price

Source: World Gold Council

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Year

  Gold price
Source: Bloomberg

  Copper price

  S&P 500 Total Return Index

021

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021North America1

Nevada Gold Mines (61.5% )

100% Production: 3,311koz
Attributable Production: 2,036koz

Turquoise Ridge Complex2
100% Production: 543koz
Attributable Production: 334koz
P&P Reservesi: 8.6Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 12Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.74Moz

Donlin Gold (50%) 
M&I Resources3,i: 20Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 3Moz

Hemlo  (100%)

100% Production: 150koz
P&P Reservesi: 1.1Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 2.6Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.82Moz

Carlin Complex2,4
100% Production: 1.5Moz
Attributable Production: 923koz
P&P Reservesi: 11Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 19Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 4.6Moz

Cortez Complex2,5 
100% Production: 828koz
Attributable Production: 509koz
P&P Reservesi: 8.8Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 11Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 3.9Moz

Phoenix
100% Production: 178koz
Attributable Production: 109koz
P&P Reservesi: 2.0Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 4.0Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.36Moz

Long Canyon
100% Production: 261koz
Attributable Production: 161koz
P&P Reservesi: 0.023Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 0.85Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.19Moz

022

Golden Sunlight  
(100%)

CANADA

USA

Fourmile (100%)
M&I Resources3,i: 0.35Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 2.2Moz

Corporate office, Toronto

  Gold producing
  In closure
  Projects
  Corporate office

1 

2 
3 

4 

5 

 All figures as at December 31, 2021.  Figures 
for mineral reserves and mineral resources are 
attributable to Barrick.
Tier One operation.
 Mineral resources are reported inclusive of 
mineral reserves.
 Operating results within our 61.5% interest 
in the Carlin Complex includes NGM’s 60% 
interest in South Arturo until May 30, 2021, 
and 100% interest thereafter.
 Mineral reserves and resources at Cortez are 
reported inclusive of Goldrush.

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationNORTH AMERICA (CONTINUED)

Barrick is the largest gold producer in the United States. Nevada Gold 
Mines is the single largest gold mining complex in the world and anchors 
the  group’s  production  from  this  region.    Barrick  operates  and  owns 
61.5% of this joint venture, which includes three of the company’s Tier 
One assets – Carlin, Cortez and Turquoise Ridge.  In 2021, attributable 
gold production from NGM was two million ounces.

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD 
PRODUCTION

COST OF SALESi, TOTAL CASH COSTSi AND AISCi

koz

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2,100
to
2,300

$/oz

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2020

2021

2022
(est)

2020

2021
2021

1,050
to
1,130

1,040
to
1,120

740
to
800

2022
(est)

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD MINERAL 
RESERVES AND RESOURCES1,i 

NORTH AMERICA 5-YEAR GOLD OUTLOOKii

Cost of sales

Total cash costs

AISC

Moz
80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Proven
and
probable
reserves

Measured
and
indicated
resources

Inferred
resources

Gold production (attributable), Moz
Gold capital expendituresi (attributable), $ million

Cost of sales2,i
Total cash costs2,i
AISC2,i
$/oz

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

Carlin3
Long Canyon
Total capital

Cortez
Phoenix
Cost of sales

Turquoise Ridge
Hemlo

Total cash costs

AISC

1 
2 

3 

 Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves.
 Royalty expenses included in the per ounce cost metrics are based on a gold price assumption of $1,700/oz for 2022 onwards.  Our realized gold 
price in 2021 was $1,790/oz i.
 Operating results within our 61.5% interest in the Carlin Complex includes NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo until May 30, 2021, and 100% interest 
thereafter.

023

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021NORTH AMERICA (CONTINUED)

Pouring its first gold over 150 years ago, Cortez is expected to 
continue producing long into the future through projects such as 
Goldrush, Robertson and potentially Fourmile.  We completed an 
updated feasibility study of Goldrush in 2021, which confirmed 
the project’s world-class status that more than meets Barrick’s 
investment  criteria.    The  issuance  of  a  Record  of  Decision 
(ROD)  for  Goldrush  remains  on  track  for  the  second  half  of 
2022.  Resources continued to grow at Robertson year on year, 
supporting our plan for the deposit to contribute meaningfully to 
Cortez’s production profile starting in 2025. 

The creation of the Nevada Gold Mines joint venture was driven 
by  the  opportunity  to  unlock  value  through  the  combination  of 
Barrick’s  and  Newmont’s  assets  in  the  state.    The  expertise 
we  have  brought  together  to  execute  a  disciplined  exploration 
strategy  has  resulted  in  maiden  resources  declared  at  North 
Leeville  and  Ren  for  2021,  demonstrating  the  strong  organic 
growth potential at the Carlin Complex.  Mineralization is open in 
all directions and drilling continues at both targets.  Elsewhere at 
the Carlin Complex, resources have increased year on year from 
the  open  pits  at  Gold  Quarry  and  South  Arturo,  as  well  as  the 
underground at Leeville and Rita K.

Development of the third shaft at Turquoise Ridge is advancing 
in  line  with  schedule  and  budget.    On  commissioning  by  late 

2022, the third shaft is expected to provide additional ventilation 
for  underground  mining  operations  as  well  as  shorter  haulage 
distances.  

Completing the NGM portfolio is Phoenix and Long Canyon.  At 
Phoenix, the copper by-product generated by the mine provides 
diversification  and  further  cash  flow  growth  from  this  strategic 
metal.  The focus at Long Canyon is now shifting to permitting 
Phase  2.    It  is  expected  to  begin  production  in  2026  and  is 
included in our 10-year outlook. 

Elsewhere in North America, our pioneering tailings reprocessing 
project  at  Golden  Sunlight  will  serve  as  a  model  for  future 
mine  closures  across  the  Barrick  asset  base,  which  combines 
rehabilitation  with  value  creation.    At  Hemlo,  ramping  up  the 
underground and improving productivity remains the key focus 
over the near term.

Our orebody knowledge of Donlin in Alaska continues to grow.  
The  2021  drill  campaign  finished  strongly  with  high-grade 
intercepts and some of the best drill results for an open pit gold 
project industry wide.  We began 2022 under the largest project 
budget for Donlin in over a decade, designed to update geologic 
modelling  and  interpretation  work  for  an  updated  resource 
model,  including  engineering  activities  for  use  in  a  potential 
updated feasibility study.

Our Tier One assets
Carlin Complex

Cortez Complex

Carlin Complex consists of multiple open pit and underground 
mines  and  several  processing  facilities.    These  include  two 
roasters, an autoclave, an oxide mill and heap leach pads.  The 
maiden resources declared at North Leeville and Ren for 2021 
further demonstrates the strong exploration potential within the 
Carlin  Trend,  a  world-class  geological  marvel  comparable  to 
Witwatersrand in its heyday.

Turquoise Ridge Complex

Cortez Complex consists of the Pipeline open pit complex and 
the  Cortez  Hills  underground  operation.    Significant  growth 
at  the  complex  over  the  next  five  to  ten  years  will  be  driven 
by Goldrush, Robertson and potentially Fourmile.  Subject to 
the ROD, the development of Goldrush is expected to achieve 
commercial production in 2025.  Processing at Cortez consists 
of an oxide mill and heap leach pads, with refractory material 
processed at the Carlin Complex. 

Turquoise  Ridge  Complex,  which  includes  Twin  Creeks, 
consists of multiple open pit and underground mines as well 
as an autoclave, oxide mill and a heap leach pad.  The high-
grade Turquoise Ridge underground mine is the value driver of 
the complex and construction of a third shaft at the operation 
is  on  schedule  and  within  budget  for  commissioning  in  late 
2022.    Together  with  increased  hoisting  capacity,  the  5,500 
tonnes  per  day  third  shaft  is  expected  to  provide  additional 
ventilation  for  underground  mining  operations  as  well  as 
shorter haulage distances.

024

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationCase study

NORTH AMERICA (CONTINUED)

UNLOCKING NEVADA’S 
POTENTIAL
Progress in improving orebody knowledge has opened up 
resource growth and exploration opportunities

The  world’s  largest  gold  mining  complex,  Nevada  Gold 
Mines  (NGM),  stands  out  from  the  rest  of  the  industry 
not  only  because  of  its  size  but  because  its  wealth  and 
prospects  secure  its  future  as  a  high-quality,  long-life 
operation  for  decades  to  come.    NGM  is  61.5%  owned 
and operated by Barrick.

Formed in July 2019, through a joint venture partnership by 
Barrick and Newmont, the combination of their respective 
assets  has  unlocked  the  vast  geological  potential  of  this 
mineral  rich  region  by  consolidating  mines,  processing 
facilities  and  landholdings.    It  is  anchored  by  three  Tier 
One  mines  –  Carlin,  Cortez  and  Turquoise  Ridge  –  with 
Goldrush  and  Fourmile  heading  up  a  long  pipeline  of 
quality projects.   

Rapid progress in improving orebody knowledge has opened 
up resource growth and exploration opportunities, notably at 
North Leeville, Ren, Robertson, Turquoise Ridge and Carlin.  
The integrated leadership team has also continued to realize 
the  value-creating  synergies  presented  by  the  joint  venture 
through  reallocating  resources  between  mine  sites,  and 
sharing skills and equipment to maximize returns. 

At  the  same  time,  NGM  has  been  reinforcing  its  social 
licence to operate by building strong relationships with its 
local communities, the counties, the state and the federal 
agencies.    To  ensure  that  community  needs  are  being 
met,  advisory  groups  consisting  of  local  stakeholders 
have  been  formed  to  nominate  development  projects  for 
investment.    Some  of  these  initiatives  include  the  Elko 

Nevada  Gold  Mines 

is  firmly 
demonstrating the impact of operator 
and majority-owner Barrick’s strategy 
of  combining  the  best  people  with  
the  best  assets  to  deliver  the  best 
returns.

Christine Keener,  
COO North America

broadband  project,  bringing  high-speed  internet  services 
to  the  area;  the  i-80  Fund,  which  has  been  repurposed 
from  a  Covid-19  relief  program  to  a  rural  development 
initiative; and the employee-driven NGM Heritage Fund.

NGM has a strong track record in environmental remediation 
and reclamation, and is a committed custodian of Nevada’s 
unique  lands,  waters,  flora  and  fauna.  In  support  of 
Barrick’s clean energy drive as well as the state’s carbon-
reduction objectives, NGM is converting its TS coal power 
plant to a dual fuel process which will enable it to generate 
power  from  natural  gas.    The  conversion  will  allow  NGM 
to eliminate 563,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent 
emissions per year. Its clean energy strategy also includes 
the  installation  of  over  200MW  of  solar  power.  Together, 
these  have  the  potential  to  reduce  NGM’s  emissions  by 
20% by 2025. 

025

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Latin America and  
Asia Pacific1

Norte Abierto (50%)
P&P Copper Reservesi: 2,900Mlb
M&I Copper Resources3,i: 5,500Mlb
Inferred Copper Resources3,i: 1,400Mlb
P&P Gold Reservesi: 12Moz
M&I Gold Resources3,i: 22Moz
Inferred Gold Resources3,i: 4.4Moz

Pueblo Viejo2 (60%) 
100% Production: 814koz
Attributable Production: 488koz
P&P Reservesi: 5.4Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 14Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 2.1Moz

Zaldívar (50%)
100% Production: 193Mlb
Attributable Production: 97Mlb
P&P Reservesi: 2,100Mlb
M&I Resources3,i: 5,300Mlb
Inferred Resources3,i: 190Mlb

Pascua-Lama (100%)
M&I Resources3,i: 21Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.86Moz

DOMINICAN 
REPUBLIC

GUYANA

SURINAME

Veladero (50%)
100% Production: 344koz
Attributable Production: 172koz
P&P Reservesi: 2.2Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 3.0Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.39Moz

Pierina 
(100%)

PERU

Alturas (100%)
Inferred Resources3,i: 8.9Moz

CHILE

  Gold producing
  In closure
  Projects
  Copper producing 
   Care and maintenance

1 

2 
3 
4 

 All figures as at December 31, 2021.  Figures for mineral reserves and mineral 
resources are attributable to Barrick.
 Tier One mine.
 Mineral resources are reported inclusive of mineral reserves.
 Porgera mineral reserves and mineral resources are reported on a 24.5% interest basis, 
reflecting Barrick’s expected ownership interest following the implementation of the binding 
Commencement Agreement entered into by Barrick Niugini Limited, its affiliate Porgera 
(Jersey) Limited, the Government of Papua New Guinea, Kumul Minerals Holding Limited, 
and Mineral Resources Enga Limited, effective February 3, 2022.

026

ARGENTINA

JAPAN

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Porgera (24.5%)4
P&P Reservesi: 1.2Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 2.0Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.59Moz

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationLATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC (CONTINUED)

This region saw tremendous change in 2021.  In the Dominican Republic, 
the  plant  expansion  and  mine  life  extension  projects  at  Pueblo  Viejo 
have made significant progress towards securing a potential Life of Mine 
extension  beyond  the  2040s.    At  Veladero,  we  successfully  completed 
commissioning  of  the  Phase  6  leach  pad  expansion  and  started 
construction for the next phase of production.

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD 
PRODUCTION

GOLD COST OF SALESi, TOTAL CASH COSTSi AND AISCi

koz

1,000

750

500

250

0

620
to
680

$/oz
1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

1,140
to
1,220

1,040
to
1,120

700
to
760

2020

2021

2022
(est)

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD MINERAL 
RESERVES AND RESOURCES1,i  

Moz
80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Proven
and
probable
reserves

Measured
and
indicated
resources

Inferred
resources

2020

2021

2022
(est)

Cost of sales

Total cash  costs

AISC

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC 5-YEAR GOLD OUTLOOK2,ii

Gold production (attributable), Moz
Gold capital expendituresi (attributable), $ million 

Cost of sales3,i
Total cash costs3,i
AISC3,i
$/oz

1.50

1.25

1.00

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.00

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Pueblo Viejo
Cost of sales

Veladero
Total cash costs

Total capital
AISC

1  
2 

3  

 Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves. 
 Excludes Porgera, which was placed on temporary care and maintenance in April 2020.  We expect to update our guidance to include Porgera following the 
execution of all the definitive agreements to implement the binding February 2022 Porgera Project Commencement Agreement (which replaces the Framework 
Agreement signed in April 2021) with the Government of Papua New Guinea and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations.
 Royalty expenses included in the per ounce cost metrics are based on a gold price assumption of $1,700/oz for 2022 onwards.  Our realized gold price in 
2021 was $1,790/oz i.

027

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC (CONTINUED)

The  Pueblo  Viejo  plant  expansion  designed  to  increase 
throughput  to  14  million  tonnes  per  annum  continues  to 
advance, with completion expected by the end of 2022.  The 
new  tailings  storage  facility  is  in  the  permitting  phase  and 
together  with  the  plant  expansion,  will  allow  the  operation 
to maintain average annual gold production of approximately 
800,000 ounces per year after 2022 (on a 100% basis). 

Our work on extending Veladero’s mine life and positive impact 
to  the  local  community  made  significant  strides  in  2021.  
Notably, the Phase 6 leach pad expansion was successfully 
commissioned  in  the  second  quarter  of  2021,  in  line  with 
guidance.    The  commissioning  of  this  phase  also  ushered 
in  the  establishment  of  a  new  trust  fund  for  community 
development  projects,  financed  by  1.5%  of  Veladero’s  gold 
sales.    Looking  ahead,  construction  for  the  next  stage  of 
mining is progressing well, with Phase 7 construction under 
way.  

Latin  America  holds  the  potential  for  new  discoveries  across 
our  extensive  land  package.    Barrick  is  extensively  exploring 
for  more  resources  for  the  Pascua-Lama  project,  which 
straddles the border between Argentina and Chile.  A decision 
is  expected  in  2024  on  whether  Lama,  located  in  Argentina, 
meets  our  investment  criteria  for  development.    Barrick’s 
exploration  teams  are  also  evaluating  a  range  of  exciting 
targets along the El Indio Belt, including around Veladero and  
Alturas-Del Carmen.

At  Zaldivar  in  Chile,  construction  of  the  Chloride  Leach 
Project was completed in early 2022.  The project is expected 
to  increase  copper  production  by  approximately  10  to  15 
thousand tonnes per annum at lower operating costs over the 
remaining life of mine.  Zaldivar is operated by Antofagasta.  

Across the Pacific Ocean at Porgera, we remain in constructive 
discussions with the Government of Papua New Guinea and 
are optimistic for operations to resume in 2022.

Our Tier One asset
Pueblo Viejo 

Pueblo  Viejo  consists  of  two  open  pits,  Moore  and  Monte  Negro,  with  processing  through  autoclaves.    The  plant  expansion 
and mine life extension projects remain on track, with construction of the plant expansion well under way and the new tailings 
storage facility in the permitting phase.  

The expansion of Pueblo Viejo will extend its life to 2040 and beyond as well as double the significant contribution the mine has 
already made to the Dominican Republic’s economy.

028

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationCase study

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC (CONTINUED)

TRANSFORMING PUEBLO VIEJO
Extending its life beyond 2040

The  Pueblo  Viejo  mine  is  continuing  to  advance  a  plant 
expansion  and  mine  life  extension  project  designed  to 
increase its life to 2040 and beyond.  This project, which 
requires  an  investment  of  approximately  $1.4 billion  on  a 
100%  basis,  has  the  potential  to  allow    Pueblo  Viejo  to 
convert  approximately  9 million  ounces  of  measured  and 
indicated  resourcesi  to  proven  and  probable  reserves.  
Work  is  well  under  way  on  the  plant  expansion  and  the 
new tailings facility is at the permitting stage.

With the project, Pueblo Viejo’s total economic contribution 
to the Dominican government in direct and indirect taxes 
is  expected  to  be  over  $9  billion  from  the  beginning  of 
commercial production in 2013 through the extended life 
of mine.  Pueblo Viejo is the Dominican Republic’s largest 
corporate  taxpayer.    The  extension  of  its  life  means  that 
it  would  continue  to  be  a  major  creator  of  value  for  the 
Dominican Republic and its people far into the future.

Of  the  mine’s  2,600  employees,  97%  are  Dominicans, 
many  drawn  from  its  surrounding  communities  which  have 
all  benefited  substantially  from  its  investment  in  upliftment 
programs.    At  present,  the  mine  is  involved  in  such 
programs in 58 surrounding communities.  These include an 
agribusiness project intended to improve cacao cultivation in 
the area.  In line with Barrick’s global policy of favoring local 
contractors  and  suppliers,  Pueblo  Viejo  has  also  promoted 
the development of the local economy, spending more than 
$160 million with them over the past eight years.  

Pueblo  Viejo’s  expansion  project 
has  the  potential  to  double  the 
enormous  contribution  it  has  already 
made  to  the  Dominican  Republic’s 
economy.

Mark Hill,  
COO Latin America and Asia Pacific

The drive for gender diversity is also paying dividends, with 
women now accounting for 16% of the workforce.

Pueblo  Viejo’s  management  has  been  very  successful 
in  addressing  environmental  liabilities  and  significantly 
improving the water quality of the two nearby rivers.  The 
operation’s  previous  operator  effectively  abandoned  the 
mine  in  1995  without  a  proper  closure,  leaving  it  with  a 
major  water  contamination  problem.    When  Barrick  took 
over  the  asset,  it  launched  the  largest  environmental 
clean-up campaign in the country’s history, and the water 
quality now meets regulatory standards.

029

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Africa and Middle East1

Loulo-Gounkoto Complex2  (80%)
100% Production: 700koz
Attributable Production: 560koz
P&P Reservesi: 6.7Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 9.3Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 1.0Moz

Jabal Sayid (50%)
100% Production: 152Mlb
Attributable Production: 76Mlb
P&P Reservesi: 650Mlb
M&I Resources3,i: 780Mlb
Inferred Resources3,i: 38Mlb

Kibali2 (45%)
100% Production: 812koz
Attributable Production: 366koz
P&P Reservesi: 4.3Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 6.9Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.89Moz

Tongon (89.7%)
100% Production: 209koz
Attributable Production: 187koz
P&P Reservesi: 0.47Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 0.71Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.30Moz

SENEGAL

MALI

CÔTE 
D’IVOIRE

EGYPT

SAUDI 
ARABIA

DRC

ZAMBIA

TANZANIA

North Mara (84%)
100% Production: 309koz
Attributable Production: 260koz
P&P Reservesi: 2.8Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 4.1Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 0.65Moz

Lumwana (100%)
100% Production: 242Mlb
P&P Reservesi: 6,000Mlb
M&I Resources3,i: 11,000Mlb
Inferred Resources3,i: 93Mlb

Buzwagi (84%)

Bulyanhulu (84%)
100% Production: 212koz
Attributable Production: 178koz
P&P Reservesi: 2.5Moz
M&I Resources3,i: 4.8Moz
Inferred Resources3,i: 6.2Moz

  Gold producing
  Copper producing 
  In closure

1 

2 
3 

 All figures as at December 31, 2021.  Figures for mineral reserves and 
mineral resources are attributable to Barrick. 
 Tier One mine.
 Mineral resources are reported inclusive of mineral reserves.

030

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationAFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST (CONTINUED)

Barrick  is  the  largest  gold  producer  in  Africa.    Loulo-Gounkoto  in  Mali 
and  Kibali  in  the  DRC  are  both  Tier  One  assets,  contributing  926,000 
attributable  ounces  of  gold  during  2021.    Significant  progress  was  also 
made in moving the Bulyanhulu and North Mara mines, as a combined 
complex, closer to potential Tier One status with total production of more 
than 500,000 ounces in 2021 on a 100% basis.

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD 
PRODUCTION

GOLD COST OF SALESi, TOTAL CASH COSTSi AND AISCi

koz

1,600

1,200

800

400

0

1,450
to
1,600

2020

2021

2022
(est)

$/oz

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2020

2020
2021

1,070
to
1,150

950
to
1,030

720
to
780

2022
(est)

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD MINERAL  
RESERVES AND RESOURCES1,i 

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST 5-YEAR GOLD OUTLOOKii

Cost of sales

Total cash costs

AISC

Moz
30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Proven
and
probable
reserves

Measured
and
indicated
resources

Inferred
resources

Gold production (attributable), Moz
Gold capital expendituresi (attributable), $ million

Cost of sales2,i
Total cash costs2,i
AISC2,i
$/oz

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

Loulo-Gounkoto
Bulyanhulu
Total capital

Kibali
Buzwagi

North Mara
Tongon

Cost of sales

Total cash costs

AISC

1 
2 

 Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves. 
 Royalty expenses included in the per ounce cost metrics are based on a gold price assumption of $1,700/oz for 2022 onwards.  Our realized gold price in 
2021 was $1,790/oz i.

031

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST (CONTINUED)

At  Loulo-Gounkoto,  the  complex’s  third  underground  mine 
was  commissioned  and  delivered  first  ore  in  the  second 
quarter  of  2021,  in  line  with  guidance.    Production  from  the 
complex also achieved the top-end of guidance for the year. 
Across  the  river  at  Bambadji  in  Senegal,  we  have  doubled 
our land position and have generated robust anomalies to be 
tested. 

Mineral reserves increased at Kibali, net of depletion, for the 
third successive year.  We continue to add to the asset’s plus 
10-year life, with strong potential from a new high-grade lode 
discovered above the base of shaft infrastructure. 

In  Tanzania,  significant  progress  was  achieved  in  moving 
Bulyanhulu and North Mara closer to potential Tier One status 
as a combined complex.  

At  Bulyanhulu,  we  successfully  completed  the  ramp-up  of 
underground mining and processing operations by the end of 
2021.  At North Mara, the mine is on track to become a fully 
integrated open-pit and  underground operation in 2022 with 
the planned commissioning of the Rama pit in the first quarter 
and the Gena pit in the third quarter.

Exploration successfully extended the mine life from fresh ore 
at  Tongon  in  Côte  d’Ivoire  to  2024,  with  drill  rigs  continuing 
to  turn  and  test  for  further  resource  expansion  at  satellite 
deposits.

On the copper front, Lumwana and Jabal Sayid continued to 
provide steady cash flow through 2021, as well as operational 
leverage to a metal poised for strong secular growth.

Our Tier One assets
Loulo-Gounkoto

Kibali

The  Loulo-Gounkoto  complex  comprises  the  Yalea  and  Gara 
underground operations, the Gounkoto open pit and underground 
operations as well as a number of satellite deposits. 

Kibali  was  developed  by  legacy  Randgold  and  along  with 
Loulo-Gounkoto,  ranks  as  one  of  the  largest  gold  mines  in 
Africa.

Production  at  Loulo  started  in  2005  as  an  open  pit  operation, 
followed  by  the  development  of  two  underground  mines  at 
the  Yalea  and  Gara  deposits.    Access  to  Yalea  and  Gara  is 
from  portals.    The  carbon-in-leach  processing  plant  at  Loulo 
has  a  throughput  capacity  of  4.8  million  tonnes  per  annum.  
Commissioned  in  the  third  quarter  of  2020,  the  solar  plant  at 
Loulo  currently  delivers  approximately  20MW  of  power  daily 
depending  on  the  weather.    This  is  expected  to  reduce  CO2e 
emissions by 27,000 tonnes per year.

Gounkoto, a greenfields discovery, poured first gold in 2011 with 
ore toll treated through the Loulo plant.  Production at Gounkoto 
commenced  with  an  open  pit  but  underground  mining  has 
started and is ramping up.  Gounkoto underground delivered first 
ore in the second quarter of 2021, in line with guidance.

Kibali  comprises  an  integrated  open  pit  and  underground 
operation,  as  well  as  a  7.2  million  tonnes  per  annum 
processing plant.  First gold was poured in 2013 from open 
pit  operations,  while  full  underground  commissioning  was 
completed at the end of 2017.  The majority of underground 
ore is hoisted to surface through a shaft.

Power is supplied by three hydropower stations supported by 
thermal  power  during  the  low  rainfall  periods.    In  a  move  to 
further reduce diesel consumption, a 9MW battery was installed 
to  provide  power  surge  capacity  which  is  currently  supplied 
by  generators.    This  will  reduce  the  need  for  thermal  power  
top-ups at an estimated saving of 8,000 tonnes of CO2e per 
year.

032

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationCase study

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST (CONTINUED)

RESURRECTING BULYANHULU
How Barrick transformed a derelict mine into a world-class asset

Two  years  ago,  the  Bulyanhulu  gold  mine  in  Tanzania 
was on care and maintenance, with only its small tailings 
reprocessing operation still limping along: a burden to its 
shareholders and the state.

Then Barrick took over, rebuilt and reopened Bulyanhulu, 
now transformed beyond recognition into one that, along 
with sister mine North Mara, has the potential to produce 
more than 500,000 ounces of gold per year and, according 
to  the  latest  geological  model,  can  maintain  a  consistent 
production profile to 2040 and beyond.

The first step was to mend bridges with the state, which 
resulted in the establishment of the groundbreaking Twiga 
Minerals  Corporation,  a  joint  venture  between  Barrick 
and  the  government  of  Tanzania,  which  oversees  the 
management of the Tanzanian mines and the equal sharing 
of the economic benefits they create.

recompiled  and  validated, 
The  drill  database  was 
underground  development  was  re-surveyed,  new  mineral 
resource  and  geotechnical  block  models  were  generated 
and mine designs were fully updated.

The  processing  plant  at  Bulyanhulu  was  completely 
refurbished  and  ramped  up  to  a  145tph  throughput,  as 
were the vertical shaft and materials handling infrastructure.  
A secondary crushing and sampling circuit was introduced 
along  with  an  open  conical  stockpile  and  reclamation 
facility  designed  to  improve  mill  feed.    During  the  year,  it 
commissioned a PhotonAssayTM laboratory, the first of its 
kind in Africa and in Barrick’s global operations.

Bulyanhulu  had  effectively  been 
trashed by its previous operators who 
also destroyed its relationship with its 
community as well as the government.  
But Barrick’s geologists saw the value 
in this unloved mine and we set about 
unlocking it, applying our core business 
principles. 

Willem Jacobs,  
COO Africa and Middle East

from  shipping 
Bulyanhulu  has  also  moved  away 
concentrates abroad for processing and is now producing 
gold bars on site.

In the meantime, ongoing geometallurgical testwork could 
unlock  further  resources  within  developed  mine  areas 
while  brownfields  exploration  probes  the  potential  within 
and outside the Bulyanhulu permit for new mining fronts.

As the mine moves into the final stages of its ramp-up, the 
workforce has increased from 155 to 878, of whom 94% 
are Tanzanians, with 39% drawn directly from surrounding 
communities.  Bulyanhulu is also increasing its economic 
support for local businesses, with 70% of its procurement 
now spent with Tanzanian contractors and suppliers.

033

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Reserves and resources 

This  compares  to  measured  and  indicated  gold  resources 
of  160  million  ouncesi  at  an  average  grade  of  1.52g/t  at 
December  31,  2020.    At  December  31,  2021,  Barrick’s 
attributable inferred gold resources were 42 million ouncesi at 
an average grade of 1.3g/t, compared to 43 million ouncesi at 
an average grade of 1.4g/t the previous year.  Excluding the 
impact of the expected change in equity interest at Porgera, 
the  disposal  of  Lagunas  Norte,  and  the  South  Arturo  asset 
exchange  with  i-80  Gold,  Barrick’s  total  attributable  mineral 
resource  replacement  net  of  depletion  was  126%.    This 
growth in total mineral resources stems from a combination of 
increased confidence in the company’s geological models as 
well as a more integrated approach to mine planning, resulting 
in  improved  optimizations  that  ultimately  support  increased 
mineral resource conversion.  

Copper reserves for 2021 are calculated using a copper price 
of $2.75 per pound and resources are calculated at $3.50 per 
pound, both unchanged from 2020.  At December 31, 2021, 
attributable  proven  and  probable  copper  mineral  reserves 
were  12 billion  poundsi  at  an  average  grade  of  0.38%.    This 
compares to 13 billion poundsi at an average grade of 0.39% 
for the prior year. 

Attributable measured and indicated copper mineral resources 
were  24  billion  poundsi  at  an  average  grade  of  0.35%,  and 
inferred  copper  mineral  resources  were  2.1  billion  poundsi 
at  an  average  grade  of  0.2%  at  December  31,  2021.    This 
compares  to  prior  year  attributable  measured  and  indicated 
copper mineral resources of 25 billion poundsi at an average 
grade  of  0.36%,  and  inferred  copper  mineral  resources  of 
2.2 billion poundsi at an average grade of 0.2%.

Strong replacement of depletion at 
both the resource and reserve level 
is  a  direct  result  of  the  geological 
remodeling 
improvements  and 
undertaken  over 
the  previous 
three  years  following  the  Merger.  
The  incorporation  and  integration 
of  mine  design  optimizations  are 
also driving many of the additions.  

A  sound  understanding  of  the  geological  orebody  has  been 
integrated  with  a  better  understanding  of  local  variations  in 
the  geotechnical  and  metallurgical  disciplines  to  produce 
integrated and optimized mine designs.

As  at  December  31,  2021,  Barrick’s  attributable  proven 
and  probable  gold  reserves  were  69  million  ouncesi  at  an 
average  grade  of  1.71g/t,  increasing  from  68  million  ouncesi 
at  an  average  grade  of  1.66g/t  in  2020.    Reserves  were 
estimated  using  a  gold  price  assumption  of  $1,200  per 
ounce,  unchanged  from  2020.    The  year-on-year  change 
incorporates  the  net  removal  of  0.91  million  ounces  from 
reserves,  due  to  the  expected  change  in  Barrick’s  equity 
interest  in  Porgera  from  47.5%  to  24.5%,  partially  offset 
by  the  net  impact  of  the  asset  exchange  of  Lone  Tree  to  
i-80 Gold for the remaining 40% of South Arturo that Nevada 
Gold  Mines  did  not  already  own.    When  adjusting  for  the 
above ownership changes, the net increase in reserves year-
on-year is approximately 3%. 

Reserve  replenishment,  net  of  depletion,  was  achieved  at 
three  of  Barrick’s  Tier  One  Gold  Assets  –  Kibali,  Cortez  and 
Turquoise Ridge – while Bulyanhulu, North Mara, and Phoenix 
also  all  achieved  this  milestone.    This  further  moves  the 
Bulyanhulu and North Mara mines closer to potential Tier One 
status as a combined complex, while the Covid-19 pandemic 
continued  to  impact  drilling  activities  at  Veladero.    The 
company’s focus on geological modeling is delivering results 
with year-on-year mineral reserves growing, net of depletion.  
During  2021,  the  company  converted  8.1  million  ounces 
to  attributable  proven  and  probable  reserves.    Compared 
to  mining  depletion  of  5.4  million  ounces,  this  represents  a 
notable 150% replacement of depleted ounces.   

At  December  31,  2021,  Barrick’s  attributable  measured 
and  indicated  gold  resources  were  160 million  ouncesi  at  an 
average  grade  of  1.50g/t  using  a  gold  price  assumption  of 
$1,500 per ounce, unchanged from 2020.  

034

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationRESERVES AND RESOURCES (CONTINUED)

Case study

REPLENISHING OUR RESERVES
Exploration drives the Barrick train

Barrick replaced its depletion of gold mineral reserves by 
150% and improved the quality of its group reserve grade 
by 3% in 2021.  Reported at $1,200/oz, attributable proven 
and  probable  mineral  reserves  now  stand  at  69  million 
ouncesi  at  1.71g/t,  increasing  from  68  million  ouncesi  at 
1.66g/t in 2020.  Attributable measured and indicated gold 
resources for 2021 stood at 160 million ouncesi at 1.50g/t, 
with  a  further  42  million  ouncesi  at  1.3g/t  of  inferred 
resources.    Mineral  resources  are  reported  inclusive  of 
reserves and at a gold price of $1,500/oz.

Attributable  proven  and  probable  copper  reserves  were 
12 billion poundsi at an average grade of 0.38% in 2021.  
Attributable  measured  and  indicated  copper  resources 
were 24 billion poundsi at an average grade of 0.35%, and 
inferred  copper  resources  were  2.1  billion  poundsi  at  an 
average  grade  of  0.2%  in  2021.    Mineral  resources  are 
reported  inclusive  of  reserves.    Copper  mineral  reserves 
are  estimated  using  a  copper  price  of  $2.75  per  pound 
and mineral resources are estimated at $3.50 per pound.

Barrick’s  exploration  teams  continue  to  uncover  new 
satellites  and  extensions  to  existing  deposits,  and  the 
North  America  and  Africa  and  Middle  East  regions  more 
than replaced reserves after mining depletion last year.  

A 

strong  exploration 

culture 
combined  with  our 
sustainable 
is  expanding 
profitability  strategy 
our  asset  base  as  well  as  uncovering 
exciting new opportunities.

Rod Quick,  
Mineral Resource Management and  
Evaluation Executive

At  the  same  time,  greenfields  exploration  programs  are 
evaluating  new  targets  with  standalone  potential  away 
from Barrick’s mines as well as investigating new regions 
and  third-party  projects  with  the  potential  to  meet  its 
investment criteria.  

Barrick  has  also  been  expanding  its  global  footprint 
through  investments  in  prospective  new  properties  in 
Egypt, Guyana and Japan, and has set up a specialist Asia 
Pacific team to explore opportunities in that region. 

ATTRIBUTABLE CONTAINED GOLD RESERVES1,i

ATTRIBUTABLE CONTAINED COPPER RESERVES1,i

68

(0.91)

(5.4)

8.1

69

Moz

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

13

0

0.18

(0.64)

12

Blb

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

2020

Acquisition/
disposition

Depletion

Net
conversion

2021

2020

Acquisition/
disposition

Depletion

Net
conversion

2021

1 

Figures rounded to two significant digits.

Increase

Decrease

Total

035

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Exploration

Disciplined  execution  aligned  with  our  exploration  strategy 
continues  to  deliver  value  close  to  our  operating  mines.    This  is 
balanced  with  expanding  our  footprint  into  top  priority  and  often 
underexplored areas far from existing operations as we explore for 
the next Tier One discovery.

Joel Holliday
Executive Vice-President, Exploration

Filter

Filter

Filter

Reserve definition

Measured and indicated 
resources

27

14

Inferred resources

19

Advanced targets

Follow-up targets

1

23

Identified 
targets

Target 
delineation
Generative 
AOI

18

46

25

8

9

16

12

16

23

23

7

Mines

5

4

7

Feasibility projects and 
reserve and resource definition

4

3

22

Exploration targets

Identified geological
anomalies

36

30

   GENERATIVE
  EXPLORATION

Africa &
Middle East

North
America

Latin America
& Asia Pacific

Barrick’s  exploration  is  managed  using  the  resource  triangle  —  an 
integrated  business  tool.    Generative  work  ensures  a  constant  supply 
of  targets  to  the  base  of  the  triangle  and  a  set  of  stringent  filters,  at 
progressive levels within the triangle, ensures the promotion of quality 
targets  and  the  rejection  of  inferior  ones,  with  economic  deposits 
ultimately reaching the pinnacle of the triangle.

036

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationNorth America

Nevada Gold Mines landholdings encompass more than two 
million acres across some of the best endowed gold trends in 
North America.

Highlights  of  the  company’s  exploration  program  for  2021 
include  the  Ren  and  North  Leeville  underground  projects 
delivering  maiden  additions  to  the  resource  base,  and  they 
are expected to be growth areas for Carlin into the future with 
mineralization open in all directions.

Additional  opportunities  for  near  to  medium-term  life  of 
mine  extensions  have  advanced  at  Fourmile  and  Goldrush 
at  Cortez.    As  resource  definition  drilling  continues  and 
underground  drilling  platforms  are  established,  infill  and 
extension targets will continue to be tested, adding to the life 
of  mine  over  the  coming  years.    Longer  term  opportunities 
also  advance  in  parallel  as  exploration  seeks  to  discover 
the  next  potential  high-grade  deposit  to  the  north  along  the 
prospective structural corridor.

There are also opportunities for new discoveries at Turquoise 
Ridge  (between  Turquoise  Ridge  Underground  and  the 
Twin  Creeks  open  pit)  where  diligent  delineation  efforts  are 
delivering exciting target concepts in the space between two 
Tier  One  deposits.    A  refined  geologic  model  built  on  new 
and legacy data between the deposits has provided a robust 
framework of litho-stratigraphic and structural context leading 
to new target concepts within the high potential trend.

Generative efforts have led to the execution of two exploration 
agreements  in  North-East  Nevada.    One  is  on  the  Battle 
Mountain-Eureka 
the  Cortez  district 
westward  and  the  other,  just  outside  of  the  Nevada  Gold 
Mines area of interest.  

trend,  expanding 

EXPLORATION (CONTINUED)

Both  greenfield  opportunities  are  highlighted  by  widespread 
alteration and Carlin-style geochemistry hosted in unfavorable 
upper plate cover rocks, and sparse to no drill holes testing 
fertile  structures  at  the  projection  with  favorable  lower  plate 
carbonate  rocks.    A  combination  of  geological  mapping, 
sampling,  modeling,  and  framework  drilling  will  be  used  to 
advance these early-stage projects toward discovery.

At  Hemlo,  exploration  focus  has  shifted  to  assess  shallowly 
plunging  shoots  east  of  David  Bell,  the  eastern-most 
orebody in the camp.  The first of two phases of drilling was 
completed at the end of 2021, confirming the target criteria 
and motivating a second phase targeting the sparsely tested 
area adjacent to the deeper production levels.

Canada  is  a  priority  destination  for  Barrick  and  we  are 
determined to grow our presence in our home country.  Our 
generative and new business efforts started to manifest during 
2020; a multi-disciplinary hunting team was established, and 
our first major ground position secured.  Over 130km strike of 
prospective structural corridors was secured in 2021 through 
four  exploration  option  agreements  covering  ~124,000ha 
in  the  underexplored  Uchi  Belt  of  northern  Ontario.    Barrick 
may  earn  up  to  an  initial  70%  interest  by  meeting  certain 
expenditure  and  milestone  commitments.    The  Uchi  Belt  is 
host to the world class Red Lake deposit, which in addition 
to recent new discoveries in unconventional host rocks, has 
supported our views that this district remains underexplored 
and highly prospective.

037

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021EXPLORATION (CONTINUED)

Latin America and Asia Pacific

Over the last year, our teams have generated and are testing 
targets  across  our  existing  landholdings  while  pushing  into 
new frontiers in the Guiana Shield, Peru and Argentina.

In the Dominican Republic, we continue to explore the larger 
area  around  our  Pueblo  Viejo  mine.    A  new  structural  model 
led  to  the  recognition  of  different  corridors  of  prospectivity, 
notably  including  the  Zambrana  corridor,  where  our  work 
continues to confirm the potential for a significant blind target 
at  Arroyo  del  Rey.    Elsewhere  in  the  Dominican  Republic, 
we  have  started  to  assess  our  permits  in  two  of  the  most 
prospective mineral districts.

We have been very active across the El Indio Belt in Chile and 
Argentina, where we have drilled nine different targets during 
the  past  year.  Notably,  we  have  been  able  to  identify  and 
extend known mineralization to the east of Lama, discovered 
gold mineralization at Cerro Pelado at Veladero and identified 
several porphyry targets.

At Alturas - Del Carmen, as the delineation of the main deposit 
continues,  exploration  confirmed  the  presence  of  both  high- 
sulphidation  and  porphyry  mineralization  at  Carmen  Norte, 
providing opportunity to add value to the project.

In  the  mining-friendly  Salta  Province  of  northern  Argentina, 
we  have  made  significant  progress  on  our  exploration  work 
at  El  Quevar,  a  prospective  property  which  has  been  under- 
explored  for  its  gold  potential.  Three  targets  have  advanced 
and will be drilled in 2022.

In  Peru,  our  generative  work  has  identified  new,  early-stage 
opportunities across the country.  Two areas with the potential 
to deliver a large deposit were identified close to the Pierina 
mine.

In  Southern  Peru,  we  have  secured  the  ground  over  the 
Ichuraya project that is emerging as the next significant target 
for gold exploration in the district. We also continue our work 
to get drilling approval for the Cerro Amarillo and Tumaruma 
projects.

In the Guiana Shield, we have made the leap from generative 
activities to consolidating a meaningful land package covering 
85,000ha  via  multiple  exploration  option  agreements  and 
Barrick  applications. 
  The  prospective  Makapa  project 
land  package  is  situated  along  a  fertile  segment  of  a  major 
structural  corridor  which  extends  the  length  of  the  Guiana 
Shield  and  has  a  close  association  with  major  gold  deposits 
discovered to date.  The area has seen little to no prospecting 
or exploration due to the presence of post mineral sand cover 
which  is  masking  the  underlying  potential.    The  presence  of 
nearby  alluvial  workings  and  elevated  gold  geochemistry  at 
surface  however,  hints  at  the  hidden  mineral  potential.    We 
will be applying our knowledge and skills from our successful 
exploration  in  West  Africa,  which  has  similar  geology,  to 
expedite the exploration and expected discoveries in this belt.

The  Japan  Gold  Alliance  was  formed  in  early  2020  and 
since  then,  the  portfolio  has  grown  by  42%  to  29  projects 
covering  203,000ha.    The  majority  of  the  portfolio  has  been 
geochemically  screened,  however  due  to  Covid-19  related 
restrictions,  the  initial  two-year  evaluation  period  has  been 
extended  to  August  31,  2022  to  facilitate  completion  of  the 
first  pass  screening  phase.    Multiple  geochemical  anomalies 
have been defined across the portfolio, including over 40 gold 
anomalies  which  require  greater  geological  context  to  rank 
and rate target areas. Upon completion of the initial evaluation 
phase  this  coming  August,  properties  will  be  ranked  and 
either  prioritized  for  more  detailed  investigations  or  removal 
from the alliance.

038

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationEXPLORATION (CONTINUED)

Africa and Middle East

In Senegal, we expanded our footprint in the highly prospective 
and  underexplored  Falémé  Domain  through  the  establishment 
of  the  Dalema  joint  venture.    Early  stage  screening  programs 
are  planned  to  replenish  the  bottom  of  our  resource  triangle.  
Meanwhile  we  have  continued  to  generate  and  test  targets 
on  our  contiguous  Bambadji  joint  venture.    Indications  of 
blind  mineralization  with  complex  geometries  (Kabewest)  and 
widespread  geochemical  anomalism  in  non-traditional  rocks 
(albitites) continue to highlight the prospectivity and potential for 
new discoveries.

Across the Falémé River into Mali, the Loulo District is a true 
Tier One terrain and continues to deliver significant upside and 
discovery  potential  in  addition  to  replacing  98%  of  depletion 
in 2021.

Drilling and modelling work in the Faraba district has raised the 
potential  of  linking  Faraba  North  and  Main  over  a  2km  strike 
length  of  the  system  highlighting  a  significant  opportunity.    The 
exploration team continues to evaluate early stage near surface 
opportunities while investigating the potential at depth within key 
structural corridors.

In Côte d’Ivoire, the Seydou North discovery is showing potential 
to extend Tongon’s mine life.  We also continue to assess multiple 
additional early stage satellite opportunities that have potential to 
provide further extensions.

At our Kibali Gold Mines joint venture in the DRC, more ounces 
were added than mined throughout 2021. Drilling on the Kalimva 
deposit is investigating the potential for high grades to support an 
additional underground operation. 

Conceptual but potentially ‘game changing’ geological targets 
are also being developed in and around the KCD corridor.

Consolidation  efforts  in  Tanzania  have  continued  throughout 
the  year  focusing  on  establishing  contiguous  exploration 
footprints in our key areas of interest.  Highlights include the 
granting  of  19  new  permits  distributed  across  5  prospective 
greenstone  belts  and  the  announcement  of  the  Tembo 
transaction  to  acquire  6  prospecting  licenses  located  along 
strike of our world class Bulyanhulu gold deposit.  Integrated 
exploration  programs  are  underway  to  identify  Tier  One 
potential on our greenfields projects and brownfields satellite 
opportunities.

In  the  Central  African  Copperbelt,  a  world  class  copper 
destination  by  any  metric,  the  restart  of  exploration  at 
Lumwana  has  had  an  immediate  impact,  with  the  Lubwe 
target showing early potential to add significantly to the mine 
life. In parallel, we continue to search for opportunities to grow 
our portfolio in this prolific terrain.

Further  afield  we  continue  to  highlight  opportunities  and 
establish  an  exploration  presence  in  the  most  prospective 
gold and copper districts in the region.  On the African-Nubian 
shield  in  Egypt,  following  a  successful  bidding  process,  we 
were  granted  four  project  blocks  covering  over  2,900km2 
and teams are in the field assessing those opportunities.  At 
Jabal  Sayid  in  Saudi  Arabia,  the  team  has  been  successful 
in  replacing  depletion  again,  extending  all  known  lodes  and 
generating new targets along key structures.

039

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Mining sustainably for  
a better future

Barrick  actively  manages  community  development,  the  protection  of 
biodiversity,  respect  for  human  rights  and  climate  risk  with  the  same 
rigor and diligence as our operations and finances.  These aspects are 
deeply  connected  and  must  be  tackled  holistically  if  we  are  going  to 
make meaningful impact.

That  is  why  our  resettlement  programs  in  the  DRC  have  built 
alternative  livelihoods  as  well  as  providing  access  to  water  and 
solar  power  to  resettled  communities,  and  why  in  Zambia  our 
biodiversity  and  forest  conservation  projects  also  integrate 
poverty alleviation while providing the potential for carbon offsets.  

Unfortunately, we recorded two fatalities across the group in 2021.  
In-depth investigations, and detailed corrective action plans have 
been implemented but such losses remain a hard reminder of the 
need to continually invest in visible safety leadership at all levels 
and to embed safety-first behavior for every individual.

Sustainability  is  often  future  focused  however  but  the  here  and 
now are also critically important, and nowhere is this more evident 
than health and safety.  Our goal is Zero Harm, making sure our 
people go home safely.

We  are  committed  to  being  transparent  and  honest  in  our 
approach,  to  demonstrating  progress  and  to  finding  creative 
and comprehensive solutions that protect nature without leaving 
behind any members of society. 

We  have  seen  encouraging  progress  in  many  areas,  including 
a  13%  reduction  in  our  total  recordable  injury  frequency  rate, 
certification  of  all  operational  sites  to  the  ISO  45001  health  & 
safety  standard,  and  progress  towards  the  implementation  of 
the  Global  Industry  Standard  on  Tailings  Management  (GISTM) 
across both operational and closed facilities.  

Mining  touches  more  people  and  impacts  more  of  everyday 
life than any other industry. It is crucial to building a sustainable 
economy and Barrick remains determined to play its part in that.  

Honing our approach  

Minimize  
environmental 
impacts

Create  
economic  
benefits

Our  
Sustainability  
Strategy

Protect  
Health and 
Safety

Respect 
Human 
Rights

040

Our sustainability strategy rests on four interconnected features: 
creating  economic  benefits  for  all  stakeholders,  protecting 
health  &  safety,  respecting  human  rights  and  minimizing  our 
environmental impacts. 

We have a bottom-up governance structure that empowers each 
mine  to  be  responsible  for  managing  sustainability,  while  also 
providing oversight and expert guidance at the group level.  Our 
Environmental & Social Oversight Committee – one of our most 
senior management-level bodies – connects site-level ownership 
of sustainability with our Board, alongside regular interaction from 
the  Group  Sustainability  Executive  and  Regional  Sustainability 
Leads.  We also tie incentive compensation for our senior leaders 
to the achievement of company-wide sustainability targets such 
as  safety,  community  relations  and  environmental  performance, 
human rights and anti-corruption.

As part of our commitment to transparency we also publish our 
Sustainability Scorecard, now in its third year, which shows how 
we define good practice and benchmark ourselves against peers. 

Full details of our strategy and governance including our suite of 
sustainability policies, our stakeholder engagement practices and 
materiality assessment are available in the Sustainability section 
of our website. 

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationSustainability Scorecard
At  Barrick,  we  believe  in  measuring  and  transparently  reporting 
our ESG performance.  From diversity to development we want 
to be clear about what best practice looks like, and to rate and 
benchmark  ourselves  in  each  area  against  peers  and  our  own 
previous performance.

That  is  why,  working  with  independent  sustainability  experts, 
we have developed our Sustainability Scorecard.  This includes 
key  performance  indicators  aligned  to  the  four  pillars  of  our 
sustainability strategy and is informed by the expectations of the 
United  Nations  Global  Compact  and  relevant  frameworks  such 
as the World Gold Council’s Responsible Gold Mining Principles 
(RGMPs)  and  the  Mining  Principles  (MPs)  developed  by  ICMM 
(International Council on Mining & Metals), which we collectively 
refer to as the RGMP+. 

The abridged Sustainability Scorecard is published below.  The 
score  is  expressed  as  a  ranking  for  each  metric  in  quintiles  to 
produce  a  score  of  1  (top)  –  5  (bottom).    The  score  for  each 
indicator  was  then  summed  to  produce  a  total  score  against 
which we have graded ourselves using an A-E banding.  

FIGURE 1:  ABRIDGED SUSTAINABILITY SCORECARD

MINING SUSTAINABLY FOR A BETTER FUTURE (CONTINUED)

The metrics to be included are reviewed and updated each year to 
promote constant drive for improvement.  For 2021, the grading 
key was updated to reflect a total of 22 measures, compared to a 
total of 17 measures in 2020. 

The  results  show  that  Barrick  received  a  B  grade  in  2021, 
unchanged  from  2020.    However,  some  notable  improvements 
in  indicators  include  ISO  45001  and  ISO  14001  certification, 
development of Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) at all operational 
sites  and  improvement  in  water  reuse  and  recycling  rates.    We 
automatically rank ourselves in a bottom quintile score on safety 
in the occurrence of a fatality. 

Separate to this process, each operating mine also undertook self-
assessments against the RGMPs and MPs and developed action 
plans  to  close  identified  gaps.    Our  2021  Sustainability  Report 
assurance  process  includes  assurance  against  these  action 
plans  and  their  progress.    Refer  to  the  independent  Assurance 
Statement  for  our  progress  against  RGMP  implementation  at 
www.barrick.com/sustainability/reports-and-policies.

Safety

Social & 
economic 
development

Indicator
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate

Percentage of operational sites certified to ISO 45001 

Percentage of sites with Community Development Committees (2020) changed to Percentage 
of annual Community Development Committees commitments met (2021)1,2,4

Percentage of workforce that are nationals

Percentage of senior management that are nationals

Percentage of economic value that stays in country

Percentage of grievances resolved within 30 days1,3,4

Human rights

Percentage of security personnel receiving training on human rights

Corporate human rights benchmark score

Independent human rights assessments with zero significant findings at high risk sites1,3,4

Number of significant environmental incidents

Tonne CO2e per tonne of ore processed

Emissions reduction target (2020) changed to Progress against absolute emissions target (2021)1,2,4

Water use efficiency (recycled & reused) 

Environment

Percentage of operational sites with Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs)1

Independent tailings reviews conducted1

Percentage of sites certified to ISO 14001 (2020) changed to Percentage of ISO 14001 certified 
sites maintained (2021)2,4

GISTM progress1,3,4

Proportion of operational sites achieving annual concurrent reclamation targets1,3,4

Progress against RGMP+ implementation1,3,4

Governance

Percentage of employees receiving Code of Conduct training1

Percentage of supply partners trained on Code of Conduct at time of on-boarding1

Overall score

Quintile  
2020
5

Quintile  
2021
5

Trend

3

1

1

2

2

N/A

2

4

N/A

1

3

1

2

2

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

1

33

B

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

2

1

2

2

4

1

4

1

1

3

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

1

405

B

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 

 Internal metrics.
 Metrics that were changed in 2021 to promote constant improvement.
 New metrics included for 2021.
 N/A due to changes in the metrics that are not comparable year-on-year.
 The scores are not directly comparable due to the fact that additional metrics were added in 2021.  However, where metrics are comparable Barrick recognised an improvement.

041

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021MINING SUSTAINABLY FOR A BETTER FUTURE (CONTINUED)

Catalyzing social development
Mining  can  and  should  help  achieve  many  of  the  UN 
Sustainable  Development  Goals  (SDGs).    It  is  an  engine 
driving  socio-economic  development,  helping  achieve  
SDG 1: Ending poverty.  The interconnection between SDGs 
has been a key theme for Barrick in 2021 and we have sought to 
build climate resilience in host communities through economic 
upliftment – from investing in education, to agriculture projects 
that support food security to ensuring groundwater provision.

invested  more 

than  $26  million 

In  2021,  Barrick 
in 
community development projects around our mines including 
entrepreneurship  training  in  Mali,  support  for  students  in 
Nevada and improved access to water in San Juan, Argentina.  
We allocate these budgets through Community Development 
Committees (CDCs) that bring together local stakeholders and 
put communities in the driving seat to allocate funds based on 
the specific communities’ needs.

Community  investments  are  only  one  of  four  parallel  ways 
in  which  we  create  value  and  deliver  social  and  economic 
development for our host countries.  We also do this by paying 
our fair share of tax, by prioritizing local hiring (78% of senior 
management  were  host  country  nationals  in  2021),  and  by 
supporting local vendors through procurement and training. 

As shown in Figure 2, we distributed over $12.3 billion in 2021 
to  our  workforce,  suppliers,  host  communities  and  beyond.  
As part of this, we spent approximately $5.5 billion on goods 
and  services  from  local  and  host  country  suppliers  in  2021, 
equating  to  82%  of  our  total  procurement  spend.    Of  this, 
$1.65  billion  was  spent  on  local  suppliers  from  communities 
closest to our operations. 

Where  local  or  host  country  suppliers  are  not  able  to  supply 
the  products  or  quality  we  require,  our  site  teams  work  to 
build  capacity  and  improve  standards  through  mentorship 
programs,  skills  training,  or  by  providing  loans  to  cover  the 
cost  of  materials  needed.    The  Emprende  Alto  initiative  in 
Chile,  for  example,  offers  financial  and  technical  support  in 
areas like marketing and accounting to emerging suppliers.  In 
2021 this initiative supported more than 230 small businesses 
and  entrepreneurs  by  investing  over  $1.2  million,  supervised 
by the CDC.

Managing resettlement and  
grievances
An important part of our engagement with communities is our 
process to enable communities to formally lodge grievances.  
Our grievance mechanism helps us to understand and address 
any community concerns before they escalate and our goal is 
to respond to all grievances lodged within 30 days of receipt.  
During 2021, we received 447 grievances across all regions.  
Full details of this mechanism will be available in our upcoming 
2021 Sustainability Report. 

During  2021,  we  also  undertook  resettlement  planning  and 
engagement  at  our  Kibali  and  North  Mara  mines.    Those 
community  members  to  be  resettled  are  given  the  option 
of  having  a  house  built  for  them,  or  to  receive  funds  to 
build  their  own  houses.    We  aim  to  avoid,  minimize  or 
mitigate  the  need  for  resettlement  wherever  possible  but,  

042

where  it  becomes  necessary,  we  also  seek  to  identify  social 
development opportunities for the communities involved.  For 
example, we offer resettled community members the option of 
access to micro-hydropower or solar power when building or 
receiving their new homes, alongside support for non-mining 
livelihoods and access to basic services.  

FIGURE 2: ECONOMIC VALUE STATEMENT

Total economic value 
contributed
Proportion of employees that 
are host country nationals
Number of senior management 
that are host country nationals
Procurement to local and/or 
national vendors

2021

2020

2019

$12.4b

$12.1b

$9.3b

96%

78%

97%

80%

97%

76%

$5.5b

$4.5b

$4.4b

The net benefits of our malaria  
progam
As  with  most  of  our  sustainability  activity,  our  work  to 
combat  malaria  in  Africa  is  driven  by  fundamental  business 
requirements.  

Malaria  accounts  for  as  much  as  20-25%  of  all  worker 
absences every year and it is in the interests of our business, 
as well as the welfare of our workforce and host communities, 
that  we  take  meaningful  steps  to  eradicate  malaria  from  the 
areas around our mines. 

We have set an on-going target of a 5% year-on-year reduction 
in malaria incidence rates and during 2021, we spent more than 
$1.1 million on initiatives to combat the disease and achieved an 
8% incidence reduction compared to 2020.  Our efforts included:
 „ Larvaciding  within  a  10km  radius  of  our  mines  and 
across 
impregnated  mosquito 

nets 

distributing 
communities.

 „ Working  with  an  entomology  consultant  to  understand 
which  chemicals  will  be  most  effective  to  spray  at  each 
site. 

 „ Training  staff 

to  ensure  correct  chemical  spraying 

techniques and expanding the areas sprayed.

 „ Providing insect repellent to night shift workers (who are 

at higher risk of exposure to the disease). 

 „ In  some  regions,  providing  prophylactic  anti-malarial 
medication  to  our  workforce  during  the  four-month 
transmission season.

We  have  started  to  see  real  results  in  driving  down  malaria 
incidence at all our mine sites, helping combat absenteeism.  
In  Kibali  (DRC)  incidence  was  down  18%  in  2021  and  has 
reduced eight-fold from a baseline taken when the mine was 
first  built.    Incidence  at  Lumwana  (Zambia)  and  North  Mara 
(Tanzania)  reduced  by  at  least  60%  in  2021  underlining  the 
effectiveness of our program.

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold CorporationMINING SUSTAINABLY FOR A BETTER FUTURE (CONTINUED)

Combatting Covid-19 and 
supporting wellness
Throughout  2021,  we  continued  our  efforts  to  prevent 
Covid-19  transmission  across  all  host  countries  and  local 
communities by maintaining protocols such as hand sanitizing 
on entry, encouraging social distancing and using masks.  We 
also  have  worked  throughout  the  year  to  promote,  obtain 
and roll out vaccines.  Not just for our people, but also their 
families and the communities in which we operate, particularly 
at our operations in Africa which were left behind in the global 
vaccination drive. 

As at the end of 2021, 59% of our people were fully vaccinated 
and  a  further  8%  partially  vaccinated,  with  the  numbers 
continuing  to  increase  daily.    We  have  also  supported  our 
host  governments  and  communities,  and  at  Pueblo  Viejo 
in  Dominican  Republic  we  were  publicly  recognized  by 
the  Provincial  Ministry  of  Health  for  our  contribution  to  the 
vaccination program. 

In 2021, in the wake of Covid-19 we also increased our focus 
on  mental  health  issues  both  inside  and  outside  our  mine 
gates.  In the US for example, our mines have partnered with 
local non-profits such as Vitality Unlimited to bring behavioral 
health  services  to  community  members.    Our  Nevada  Gold 
Mines  complex  donated  $10,000  to  each  organization  for 
individual, family, or group counseling services and has seen 
76 individuals receive 114 consults with our partner providers 
since July 2021.

Mental health is just one aspect of our occupational health 
activity.    In  2021,  all  our  workers  (100%)  were  covered 
by  occupation  health  and  safety  programs  which  include 
regular  medical  checks  for  employees,  job  specific  risk 
assessments,  personal  protective  equipment  (PPE)  and 
using engineering controls and shift rotation to help minimize 
exposures to hazards.

Health & safety
Mines  are  dangerous  places  to  work  and  implementing 
robust  safety  management  measures  and  creating  a  zero-
harm  culture,  is  a  foundational  value  for  Barrick.    We  know 
we  must  work  hard  every  day  to  keep  our  people  and  the 
communities around our operations safe.

We did not do that in 2021, and we recorded two tragic and 
fatal accidents in 2021, the first at Hemlo in Canada, and the 
second  at  Tongon  in  Côte  d’Ivoire.    Our  response  to  these 
events is double pronged.  At a site and operational level, we 
carried  out  full  investigations  to  understand  the  root  cause 
of each incident and implemented corrective action plans to 
prevent  recurrence.    On  a  human  level,  we  have  worked  to 
provide support to the families of the victims and to their co-
workers and extended teams on the ground. 

We  achieved  our  goal  to  certify  all  our  operational  sites  to 
ISO 45001 standards by the end of 2021.  At group-level we 
saw the total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR) improve 
almost 13% year-on-year and by over a third since 2019.  Our 
lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) shows a significant 24% 
reduction since 2019, but a slight increase on 2020. 

FIGURE 3: OUR SAFETY PERFORMANCE

LTIFR

TRIFR

2021

0.38

1.47

2020

0.34

1.68

2019

0.50

2.24

Taking preventative safety action in 
Nevada
Analysis  of  high  potential  incident  (HPI)  data  at  our  Nevada 
Gold Mines complex this year showed that one of the most 
frequent incident types was Metal to Metal (M2M) ie incidents 
of  interaction  between  heavy  mobile  equipment  or  light 
vehicles. 

Fortunately  to  date  the  bulk  of  these  incidents  have  been 
minor  with  no  significant  injuries.    However  investigating 
leading  indicators  and  HPIs  affords  us  the  opportunity  to 
identify trends and implement remedial actions proactively to 
ensure such events do not lead to injuries. 

First the NGM safety team undertook a deep dive review of 
the  root  cause  analysis  from  past  incidents  and  identified 
three main contributing factors: poor communication, limited 
visibility, and lapses in judgement.  Next the site established 
cross-functional teams – made up of operators, supervisors, 
superintendents,  safety  specialists,  and  led  by  the  mine 
managers  –  and  sought  to  identify  any  gaps  or  areas  of 
concern.  Then, the site created action plans to close out such 
gaps.

Finally, we developed a safety share exercise to raise awareness 
of M2M incidents at safety meetings and to get feedback directly 
from the operators as to their perspective and experience.

Encouragingly, HPI frequency at the complex improved quarter-
on-quarter throughout 2021, and we had a 92% decrease from 
13 M2M incidents in Q1 to just one in Q4.

043

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021MINING SUSTAINABLY FOR A BETTER FUTURE (CONTINUED)

Respecting human rights and harnessing diversity

through 

including 

Mining  is  historically  a  male-dominated  industry  and  we 
also  work  to  right  the  gender  imbalance  in  the  wider  mining 
initiatives 
industry 
targeted to support the development of female talent, raising 
awareness among local communities about the value of female  
economic  empowerment,  working  with  governments  to 
remove  barriers  to  employment  and  supporting  alternative 
livelihood opportunities for women.

leadership 

internal 

The  challenges  of  fighting  poverty, 
climate  change  and  biodiversity  loss  are 
so  deeply  connected  that  we  have  no 
option but to tackle all of them, to make 
lasting progress in any of them.

Grant Beringer, 
Group Sustainability Executive

Recognizing  and  respecting  human  rights  has  long  been  a 
fundamental  value  for  Barrick.    It  is  embedded  as  one  of  the 
four  key  pillars  of  our  sustainability  vision  and  strategy  and  our 
approach can be easily summed up: we have zero tolerance for 
human rights violations wherever we operate.

Our commitment is codified in our standalone Human Rights Policy 
and informed by the expectations of the UN Guiding Principles on 
Business  and  Human  Rights  (UNGPs),  the  Voluntary  Principles 
on Security and Human Rights (VPs), and the OECD Guidelines 
for Multinational Enterprises.  Our Human Rights Policy also sets 
out our commitment to recognizing the unique rights and social, 
economic and cultural heritage of Indigenous Peoples.

It is a policy we implement on the ground via our Human Rights 
Program,  which  includes  monitoring  for  human  rights  incidents 
and  reporting  them  –  including  through  our  site  grievance 
mechanisms, hotline reports and internal and external audits.  It 
also includes due diligence that sees all our mines conduct human 
rights assessments on at most a three-year cycle.  Those mines 
most exposed to human rights risks are independently assessed 
on a two-year cycle.  In 2021, we undertook independent human 
rights assessments at our Kibali, Loulo-Gounkoto, Pueblo Viejo, 
North Mara and Bulyanhulu mines. 

The Human Rights Program also entails training for all employees 
on our human rights expectations and additional specialist human 
rights training, and training on the Voluntary Principles on Security 
and  Human  Rights  (VPs)  for  highly-exposed  workers  such  as 
security personnel.  Human rights measures are also built into our 
supplier onboarding and due diligence process.

Human  rights  is  an  area  we  feel  strongly  about.    In  2021  we 
published  a  stand-alone  Human  Rights  Report  detailing  this 
program in full, including our roll out of online training for human 
rights  during  the  Covid-19  pandemic  to  ensure  our  commitment 
was not hampered by global lockdowns.  This report also reflects 
on actions we have taken to remedy legacy situations that occurred 
before new management took over Barrick in 2019, as well as the 
systems we have or are putting in place to prevent any recurrence.

Embracing inclusion
We  know  a  diverse  workforce  provides  the  wide  range  of 
thinking and problem-solving skills necessary to run a global 
company.    At  Barrick,  our  approach  to  diversity  is  to  foster 
a  supportive  working  environment  in  which  all  individuals 
realize their maximum potential.  We employ the best people 
to do the job irrespective of gender, race, disability, ethnicity, 
religious belief or sexual orientation – a commitment codified 
in our Diversity Policy.

We  have  an  aspirational  target  for  women  to  account  for  at 
least 30% of the Board of Directors by the end of 2022 and, in 
2021, 27% were female.  In 2021, 11% of our workforce were 
female, an increase from 10% in 2020.

044

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation 
MINING SUSTAINABLY FOR A BETTER FUTURE (CONTINUED)

Responsible environmental stewardship

Our  commitment  to  minimizing  our  impact  on  the  natural 
environment  is  one  of  the  four  interconnected  pillars  of  our 
sustainability strategy.  2021 was a year focused on execution 
and delivery on the environmental front with all operational sites 
achieving ISO 14001:2015 certification for their environmental 
management system, and our site-led teams reducing ‘Class 2’ 
(medium-level)  environmental  impacts  by  38%  compared  to 
2020, and recording zero ‘Class 1’ (significant) environmental 
incidents for the third consecutive year.

Building resilience
In the previous section, we discussed how many of our social 
development  efforts  are  geared  to  building  the  resilience  of 
communities to environmental degradation – from agricultural 
projects  that  ensure  food  security  to  boreholes  that  bring 
access to water.  At the same time, we recognize that climate 
change,  including  shifts  in  temperature  and  more  extreme 
weather,  is  likely  to  increasingly  affect  our  operations  in  the 
years to come, and we are also building the resilience of our 
company  to  climate  and  wider  environmental  risks.    Since 
2019,  we  have  worked  to  disclose  against  the  requirements 
of  the  Task  Force  on  Climate-Related  Financial  Disclosures 
(TCFD) as part of our annual sustainability reporting. 

Water security
Access to water is a fundamental human right and we therefore 
carefully manage our use of local water bodies with the aim to 
have minimal negative impact on nearby communities.  We see 
this as critically important to our business. 

We take a risk-based approach to water management.  Each 
mine has its own site-specific water management plan, which 
takes into account the different water sources available, local 
climate conditions and the needs of local users and of the mine.  
In regions identified as water scarce, we take particular care 
to monitor the supply of freshwater for local communities and 
the ecosystem, aiming to use low-quality water and to reuse 
as  much  water  from  our  processes  as  possible.    For  mines 
where  water  stress  is  experienced  as  surplus,  our  approach 
focuses  on  diverting  large  volumes  of  water  or  storing  it  as 
clean water to discharge back into the environment. 

In  2021,  we  reused  or  recycled  82%  of  the  water  used, 
surpassing  our  target  of  80%.    We  also  continue  to  report 
using the market-leading ICMM Water Accounting Framework 
(full  details  available  in  our  upcoming  2021  Sustainability 
Report).

Climate resilience
Tackling  climate  change  requires  global  collective  action.    Our 
GHG emissions roadmap sets a target to reduce Scope 1 and 2 
emissions by at least 30% by 2030 (from a 2018 baseline), while 
maintaining a steady production profile.  This is a target grounded 
in practical measures and does not rely on closing mines, lowering 
production nor aspirational technology. 

In 2021 our total Scope 1 and 2 emissions were 7,105kt of CO2e, 
which was a reduction of more than 5% compared with our 2018 
baseline.  A key driver for this reduction was NGM’s execution of 

Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) that enable NGM to determine 
energy sources of the power consumed, allowing renewable or 
lower emissions sources to be prioritized.

Another  key  achievement  of  the  year  was  the  completion  of 
work to set a baseline for, and engage with our supply chain on, 
Scope 3 emissions (emissions that are a result of our suppliers 
and value chain).  This exercise revealed that Scope 3 emissions 
for our Tier One assets account for more than 40% of our total 
emissions and we aim to put in place a stretching reduction target 
for our value chain in the year ahead.

Safeguarding biodiversity
At Barrick we are conscious of the urgent action required to 
halt biodiversity loss and are committed to playing a positive 
role in the preservation of flora and fauna in our host countries.  
All our sites now have detailed Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) 
and associated Biodiversity Management Plans (BMPs) which 
document  the  Key  Biodiversity  Features  in  or  impacted  by  a 
site,  and  the  strategy  to  be  adopted  to  minimize  risks  and 
maximize opportunities with the ultimate goal of achieving no-
net loss. 

In  the  US,  sub-Saharan  Africa  and  Papua  New  Guinea,  we 
partner  with  NGOs,  conservation  groups,  local  authorities 
and  communities  to  deliver  positive  biodiversity  impacts  in 
these  regions.    In  Latin  America,  we  are  supporting  work  to 
restore wetlands and protect species such as the Andean cat, 
vicunas and migratory birds in the High Andes.  One way we 
do this is through partnerships with conservation actors such 
as African Parks.  We’ve long partnered with African Parks in 
the Garamba National Park in the DRC.  

Garamba  is  Africa’s  oldest  national  park  and  in  2022,  we  hope 
to realize a long-held ambition of re-introducing rhino in the park.  

Last  year  we  also  undertook  work  to  help  fill  a  knowledge 
gap  around  what  best  practice  reporting  on  biodiversity 
should  look  like  for  the  mining  sector  and,  looking  ahead, 
we  hope  to  work  with  the  wider  industry  –  through  groups 
such as ICMM – to raise the bar on biodiversity action across 
the  sector.    More  details  on  our  environmental  stewardship, 
including details of our approach and performance on waste 
management (including tailings) and air emissions are available 
in our upcoming 2021 Sustainability Report.

FIGURE 4: SNAPSHOT OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS

Proportion of sites certified to 
ISO 14001

Class 1 environmental incidents

Class 2 environmental incidents

Water use efficiency (reused 
and recycled)

Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions 
(kt CO2e)1
Percentage of operational sites 
with BAPs

2021

2020

2019

100%

94%

76% 

0

5

0

8

0

13

82%

79%

73%

7,105 

7,527

7,668

100%

92% 

54% 

1  2020 value restated – see upcoming 2021 Sustainability Report.

045

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021MINING SUSTAINABLY FOR A BETTER FUTURE (CONTINUED)

Case study

ADVANCING TO NET ZERO
Barrick aims to be Net Zero by 2050

Barrick has set itself the target of cutting its greenhouse gas 
emissions (GHG) by 30% by 2030 with the ultimate aim of net 
zero by 2050, while maintaining a steady production profile.

The  company  has  a  clear  roadmap  for  the  reduction 
of  emissions,  which  is  based  on  climate  science  and 
operational  realities.    It  does  not  rely  on  mine  closures, 
production  cutbacks  or 
the  hopeful  expectation  of 
reductions by suppliers or governments.  The ultimate aim 
is  net  zero  emissions  but  the  roadmap  has  landmarked 
targets towards this goal based on practical and available 
options.  The company’s target is not static, however, and 
is  constantly  reviewed  and  updated  as  further  reduction 
opportunities are realised.

We  have  already  allocated  capital  for  projects  that  achieve 
25% of our 2030 target with $800 million of further investment 
planned for developments such as the conversion of coal to 
natural  gas  (NG)  at  the  TS  power  plant  (TSPP)  in  Nevada, 
installation  of  solar  capacity  in  Mali  and  Nevada,  installing 
lines  to  cleaner  renewable  grids  in  Argentina  and  national 
grids in Tanzania as well as implementing battery technology 
and exploring new energy-saving assay methods in Tanzania.  
Each site also has a Climate Champion looking for new ways 
to further reduce emissions on site and in communities, from 
switching off lights to introducing electric vehicles.

GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION ROADMAP1,2 

the 

Transitioning  to  cleaner,  more 
is  not  
efficient  energy  sources 
to  do 
only 
environmentally  –  power 
is  the  
biggest  cost  factor  in  mining,  so  this 
also makes commercial sense. 

thing 

right 

Grant Beringer,  
Group Sustainability Executive

Our  reduction  strategy  is  not  static  and  we  are  constantly 
reviewing 
a 
new  decarbonisation  opportunities 
detailed  roadmap  will  be  provided  in  our  upcoming  2021 
Sustainability  Report.    The  implemented  projects  and  other  
initiatives for which capital has been committed is shown below.

and 

Barrick’s  focus  is  not  only  about  reducing  the  GHG 
emissions  at  its  current  operations  but  also  about  tracking 
and embracing new technology and innovation to ensure the 
new mines it builds in the future are designed to be industry 
leading when it comes to clean power.

k tonnes CO2e
8,000

7,500

7,000

6,500

6,000

5,500

5,000

8
1
0
2

r
a
e
y
e
s
a
b

G
N
a
y
e
u
q
s
u
Q

i

y
r
e
t
t
a
b

i
l

a
b
K

i

l

o
u
o
L

l

r
a
o
s
W
M
0
2

A
P
P
M
G
N

1
2
0
2

d
e
t
n
e
m
e
p
m

l

i

o
r
e
d
a
e
V

l

i

i

n
o
s
s
m
s
n
a
r
t

G
N
P
P
S
T

n

l
i

k
e
m

i
l

V
P

l

1
P
r
a
o
s
P
P
S
T

l

2
P
r
a
o
s
P
P
S
T

l

r
a
o
s
V
P

l

r
a
o
s

i

d
y
a
S

l

a
b
a
J

l

r
a
o
s
o
u
o
L

l

i

n
o
s
n
a
p
x
e

D
E
L

t

n
e
m
e
c
a
p
e
r

l

s
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
e
r

d
e
s
o
p
o
r
p
0
3
0
2

1 

2 

  The  roadmap  includes  reduction  initiatives  only.    Operational  expansions  and  increases  are  not  included.    Solar  to  replace  natural  gas  output  at  TSPP, 
assuming unchanged generation capacity.
  TSPP: P1 (Phase 1); P2 (Phase 2).

046

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Endnotes

i 
Please  see  page  138  of  this  annual  report  for  corresponding 
endnotes.

ii

Key assumptions

Gold Price ($/oz)

Copper Price ($/lb)

Oil Price (WTI) ($/barrel)

AUD Exchange Rate (AUD:USD)
ARS Exchange Rate (USD:ARS)
CAD Exchange Rate (USD:CAD) 
CLP Exchange Rate (USD:CLP)
EUR Exchange Rate (EUR:USD) 

2022

1,700

4.00

65

0.75

100

1.30

800

1.20

2023+

1,200

2.75

65
0.75

100

1.30

800

1.20

 „ This  five-year  indicative  outlook  is  based  on  our  current 
operating  asset  portfolio,  sustaining  projects  in  progress 
and  exploration/mineral  resource  management  initiatives  in 
execution.    This  outlook  is  based  on  our  current  reserves  and 
resources as disclosed in our Annual Report and assumes that 
we will continue to be able to convert resources into reserves.  
Additional  asset  optimization,  further  exploration  growth,  new 
project  initiatives  and  divestitures  are  not  included.    For  the 
group  gold  and  copper  segments,  and  where  applicable  for  a 
specific region, this indicative outlook is subject to change and 
assumes the following: 
 o Commissioning of the Turquoise Ridge Third Shaft by the 

end of 2022.

 o Production  from  the  Pueblo  Viejo  plant  expansion  and 

mine life extension project starting in 2023. 

 o Production  from  the  Zaldívar  CuproChlor®  Chloride 
Leach  Project  in  2022.  Antofagasta  is  the  operator  of 
Zaldívar.

 „ This five-year indicative outlook excludes:

 o Production from Porgera, which was placed on temporary 
care  and  maintenance  in  April  2020.    We  expect  to 
update  our  guidance  to  include  Porgera  following  the 
execution of all the definitive agreements to implement the 
binding February 2022 Porgera Project Commencement 
Agreement  (which  replaces  the  Framework  Agreement 
signed in April 2021) with the Government of Papua New 
Guinea and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption 
of full mine operations.
 o Production from Fourmile.
 o Production  from  Pierina  and  Golden  Sunlight,  which  are 

currently in closure.

 o Production  from  long-term  greenfield  optionality  from 

Donlin, Pascua-Lama, Norte Abierto or Alturas.

 „ Barrick’s 10-year gold production profile is subject to change 
and  is  based  on  the  same  assumptions  as  the  current 
5-year outlook, except that the subsequent five years of the  
10-year  outlook  assumes  attributable  production 
from 
Fourmile  as  well  as  exploration  and  mineral  resource 
management projects in execution at Nevada Gold Mines.

 „ Barrick  is  closely  monitoring  the  global  Covid-19  pandemic 
and Barrick’s guidance may be impacted if the operation or 
development  of  our  mines  and  projects  is  disrupted  due  to 
efforts to slow the spread of the virus.

 „ Barrick’s  long-term  gold  and  copper  price  assumption  is 
$1,200/oz  and  $2.75/lb,  respectively.  Royalty  expenses 
included  in  the  per  ounce  cost  metrics  for  our  five-year  gold 
outlook is based on a gold price assumption of $1,700/oz for 
2022 onwards. Our realized gold price in 2021 was $1,790/ozi. 
Royalty expenses included in the per pound cost metrics for our 
five-year copper outlook is based on a copper price assumption 
of $4.00/lb for 2022 onwards. Our realized copper price in 2021 
was $4.32/lbi.

047

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021Financial Report for 2021

Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 49 / Mineral Reserves and Resources 145 / Financial Statements 156  
Notes to Financial Statements 161 / Shareholder Information 208

Management’s Discussion 
and Analysis (“MD&A”)

the  “Company”  or 

Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  (“MD&A”)  is  intended  
reader  understand  Barrick  Gold  Corporation  
the 
to  help 
(“Barrick”,  “we”,  “our”, 
the  “Group”),  our 
operations,  financial  performance  and  the  present  and  future 
business environment. This MD&A, which has been prepared as of 
February 15, 2022, should be read in conjunction with our audited 
consolidated  financial  statements  (“Financial  Statements”)  for  the 
year  ended  December  31,  2021.  Unless  otherwise  indicated,  all 
amounts are presented in US dollars.

For  the  purposes  of  preparing  our  MD&A,  we  consider  the 
materiality  of  information.  Information  is  considered  material  if:  
(i) such information results in, or would reasonably be expected to 
result  in,  a  significant  change  in  the  market  price  or  value  of  our 

shares; (ii) there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor 
would  consider  it  important  in  making  an  investment  decision;  or 
(iii) it would significantly alter the total mix of information available 
to investors. We evaluate materiality with reference to all relevant 
circumstances, including potential market sensitivity. 

Continuous  disclosure  materials,  including  our  most  recent 
Information  Form,  annual  MD&A,  audited 
Form  40-F/Annual 
consolidated financial statements, and Notice of Annual Meeting of 
Shareholders  and  Proxy  Circular  will  be  available  on  our  website 
at www.barrick.com, on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR 
at  www.sec.gov.  For  an  explanation  of  terminology  unique  to  the 
mining industry, readers should refer to the glossary on page 144.

“goal”, 

“project”, 

“pursue”, 

“continue”, 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain  information  contained  or  incorporated  by  reference  in  this 
MD&A, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans 
or  future  financial  or  operating  performance,  constitutes  “forward-
looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical 
fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect”, 
“anticipated”,  “contemplate”  “vision”,  “aim”,  “strategy”,  “target”, 
“plan”, “opportunities”, “guidance”, “forecast”, “outlook”, “objective”, 
“committed”, 
“intend”, 
“budget”,  “estimate”,  “potential”,  “prospective”,  “future”,  “focus”, 
“ongoing”, “following”, “subject to”, “scheduled”, “may”, “will”, “can”, 
“could”, “would”, “should” and similar expressions identify forward-
looking  statements.  In  particular,  this  MD&A  contains  forward-
looking  statements  including,  without  limitation,  with  respect  to: 
Barrick’s  forward-looking  production  guidance;  estimates  of  future 
cost  of  sales  per  ounce  for  gold  and  per  pound  for  copper,  total 
cash  costs  per  ounce  and  C1  cash  costs  per  pound,  and  all-in-
sustaining  costs  per  ounce/pound;  cash  flow  forecasts;  projected 
capital, operating and exploration expenditures; the share buyback 
program  and  performance  dividend  policy,  including  the  criteria 
for  dividend  payments;  mine  life  and  production  rates;  Barrick’s 
engagement  with  local  communities  to  manage  the  Covid-19 
pandemic,  including  Covid-19  vaccination  initiatives  and  Covid-19 
protocols  at  Barrick’s  minesites;  projected  capital  estimates  and 
anticipated permitting timelines related to the Goldrush Project, as 
well  as  opportunities  for  development  in  the  Red  Hill  mining  zone 
during  the  permitting  process;  our  plans  and  expected  completion 
and benefits of our growth projects, including the Goldrush Project 
and construction of the twin exploration declines, Turquoise Ridge 
Third  Shaft,  Pueblo  Viejo  plant  expansion  and  mine  life  extension 
project, Bulyanhulu production ramp-up and results of the internal 
feasibility study, including further planned reserve conversion drilling 
at Deep West, Zaldívar chloride leach project, and Veladero Phase 7  
leach  pad  and  power  transmission  projects;  capital  expenditures 
related to upgrades and ongoing management initiatives, including 
at  North  Mara;  Barrick’s  global  exploration  strategy  and  planned 
exploration activities, including at North Leeville and the acquisition 
of  prospecting  licenses  in  Tanzania;  the  impact  of  Nevada’s  new 
mining excise tax on Nevada Gold Mines and of proposed changes 
to  the  U.S.  General  Mining  Law;  the  timeline  for  execution  and 
effectiveness of definitive agreements and formation of a new joint 
venture  to  implement  the  binding  Framework Agreement  between 
Papua  New  Guinea  and  Barrick  Niugini  Limited  (“BNL”)  and  the 
timeline  for  resolution  of  outstanding  tax  audits  with  Papua  New 
Guinea’s  Internal  Revenue  Commission  (“IRC”);  the  duration  of 
the  temporary  suspension  of  operations  at  Porgera  and  timeline 

to  recommence  operations;  steps  required  prior  to  the  distribution 
of  cash  and  equivalents  held  at  Kibali  in  banks  in  the  Democratic 
Republic of Congo; our pipeline of high confidence projects at or near 
existing  operations;  potential  mineralization  and  metal  or  mineral 
recoveries; our ability to convert resources into reserves and future 
reserve replacement; asset sales, joint ventures and partnerships, 
including the expected benefits of the South Arturo asset exchange, 
the  sale  of  Lagunas  Norte,  and  the  sale  of  several  other  legacy 
closure  properties;  Barrick’s  strategy,  plans,  targets  and  goals  in 
respect  of  environmental  and  social  governance  issues,  including 
climate  change,  greenhouse  gas  emissions  reduction  targets, 
tailings storage facility management, biodiversity and human rights 
initiatives;  and  expectations  regarding  future  price  assumptions, 
financial performance and other outlook or guidance.

Forward-looking  statements  are  necessarily  based  upon  a 
number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates 
and  assumptions  related  to  the  factors  set  forth  below  that,  while 
considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this MD&A 
in  light  of  management’s  experience  and  perception  of  current 
conditions  and  expected  developments,  are  inherently  subject  to 
significant  business,  economic  and  competitive  uncertainties  and 
contingencies.  Known  and  unknown  factors  could  cause  actual 
results  to  differ  materially  from  those  projected  in  the  forward-
looking  statements  and  undue  reliance  should  not  be  placed  on 
such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not 
limited to: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper 
or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas 
and electricity); risks associated with projects in the early stages of 
evaluation and for which additional engineering and other analysis 
is  required;  risks  related  to  the  possibility  that  future  exploration 
results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations, that 
quantities or grades of reserves will be diminished, and that resources 
may not be converted to reserves; risks associated with the fact that 
certain of the initiatives described in this MD&A are still in the early 
stages  and  may  not  materialize;  changes  in  mineral  production 
performance,  exploitation  and  exploration  successes;  risks  that 
exploration  data  may  be  incomplete  and  considerable  additional 
work  may  be  required  to  complete  further  evaluation,  including 
but  not  limited  to  drilling,  engineering  and  socioeconomic  studies 
and  investment;  the  speculative  nature  of  mineral  exploration  and 
development; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, 
corruption  and  other  factors  that  are  inconsistent  with  the  rule  of 
law; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, 
controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, 
policies  and  practices;  expropriation  or  nationalization  of  property 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 049

Management’s Discussion and Analysisand  political  or  economic  developments  in  Canada,  the  United 
States  or  other  countries  in  which  Barrick  does  or  may  carry  on 
business in the future; risks relating to political instability in certain 
of  the  jurisdictions  in  which  Barrick  operates;  timing  of  receipt 
of,  or  failure  to  comply  with,  necessary  permits  and  approvals, 
including  the  issuance  of  a  Record  of  Decision  for  the  Goldrush 
Project  and/or  whether  the  Goldrush  Project  will  be  permitted  to 
advance  as  currently  designed  under  its  Feasibility  Study;  non-
renewal  of  key  licenses  by  governmental  authorities,  including 
non-renewal  of  Porgera’s  special  mining  lease;  failure  to  comply 
with  environmental  and  health  and  safety  laws  and  regulations; 
contests  over  title  to  properties,  particularly  title  to  undeveloped 
properties,  or  over  access  to  water,  power  and  other  required 
infrastructure;  the  liability  associated  with  risks  and  hazards  in 
the  mining  industry,  and  the  ability  to  maintain  insurance  to  cover 
such losses; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme 
weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; 
damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived 
occurrence  of  any  number  of  events,  including  negative  publicity 
with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or 
dealings with community groups, whether true or not; risks related to 
operations near communities that may regard Barrick’s operations 
as being detrimental to them; litigation and legal and administrative 
proceedings;  operating  or  technical  difficulties  in  connection  with 
mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges, 
tailings  dam  and  storage  facilities  failures,  and  disruptions  in  the 
maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information 
technology  systems;  increased  costs,  delays,  suspensions  and 
technical  challenges  associated  with  the  construction  of  capital 
projects;  risks  associated  with  working  with  partners  in  jointly 
controlled assets; risks related to disruption of supply routes which 
may cause delays in construction and mining activities; risk of loss 
due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; risks 
associated  with  artisanal  and  illegal  mining;  risks  associated  with 
Barrick’s  infrastructure,  information  technology  systems  and  the 
implementation  of  Barrick’s  technological  initiatives;  the  impact  of 
global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and 
the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash 
flows; the impact of inflation; adverse changes in our credit ratings; 
fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest 
rates;  risks  arising  from  holding  derivative  instruments  (such  as 
credit  risk,  market  liquidity  risk  and  mark-to-market  risk);  risks 
related  to  the  demands  placed  on  the  Company’s  management, 
the  ability  of  management  to  implement  its  business  strategy  and 
enhanced political risk in certain jurisdictions; uncertainty whether 
some or all of Barrick’s targeted investments and projects will meet 
the Company’s capital allocation objectives and internal hurdle rate; 
whether  benefits  expected  from  recent  transactions  are  realized; 
business  opportunities  that  may  be  presented  to,  or  pursued  by, 
the  Company;  our  ability  to  successfully  integrate  acquisitions  or 
complete  divestitures;  risks  related  to  competition  in  the  mining 
industry;  employee  relations  including  loss  of  key  employees; 
availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and 
labor;  risks  associated  with  diseases,  epidemics  and  pandemics, 
including  the  effects  and  potential  effects  of  the  global  Covid-19 
pandemic; risks related to the failure of internal controls; and risks 
related  to  the  impairment  of  the  Company’s  goodwill  and  assets. 
Barrick  also  cautions  that  its  2022  guidance  may  be  impacted  by 
the  unprecedented  business  and  social  disruption  caused  by  the 
spread of Covid-19.

In  addition,  there  are  risks  and  hazards  associated  with  the 
business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including 
environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected 
formations,  pressures,  cave-ins,  flooding  and  gold  bullion,  copper 
cathode  or  gold  or  copper  concentrate  losses  (and  the  risk  of 
inadequate  insurance,  or  inability  to  obtain  insurance,  to  cover 
these risks).

Many  of  these  uncertainties  and  contingencies  can  affect  our 
actual  results  and  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially 
from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements 
made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-
looking  statements  are  not  guarantees  of  future  performance.  All 
of the forward-looking statements made in this MD&A are qualified 
by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the 
most  recent  Form  40-F/Annual  Information  Form  on  file  with  the 
SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a 
more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-
looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to 
achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements 
contained  in  this  MD&A.  We  disclaim  any  intention  or  obligation 
to  update  or  revise  any  forward-looking  statements  whether  as  a 
result  of  new  information,  future  events  or  otherwise,  except  as 
required by applicable law.

USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL  
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
We  use  the  following  non-GAAP  financial  performance  measures 
in our MD&A:

	Q “adjusted net earnings”
	Q “free cash flow”
	Q “EBITDA”
	Q “adjusted EBITDA”
	Q “minesite sustaining capital expenditures”
	Q “project capital expenditures”
	Q “total cash costs per ounce”
	Q “C1 cash costs per pound”
	Q “all-in sustaining costs per ounce/pound”
	Q “all-in costs per ounce” and
	Q “realized price”

For  a  detailed  description  of  each  of  the  non-GAAP  measures 
used in this MD&A and a detailed reconciliation to the most directly 
comparable  measure  under 
International  Financial  Reporting 
Standards  (“IFRS”),  please  refer  to  the  Non-GAAP  Financial 
Performance  Measures  section  of  this  MD&A  on  pages  111  to 
137.  Each  non-GAAP  financial  performance  measure  has  been 
annotated  with  a  reference  to  an  endnote  on  page  138. The  non-
GAAP  financial  performance  measures  set  out  in  this  MD&A  are 
intended  to  provide  additional  information  to  investors  and  do  not 
have any standardized meaning under IFRS, and therefore may not 
be  comparable  to  other  issuers,  and  should  not  be  considered  in 
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared 
in accordance with IFRS.

Changes in Presentation of Non-GAAP Financial 
Performance Measures
Capital Expenditures
Starting  with  this  MD&A,  we  have  identified  minesite  sustaining 
capital expenditures and project capital expenditures as non-GAAP 
financial  performance  measures  as  a  result  of  adopting  National 
Instrument  52-112  –  Non-GAAP  and  Other  Financial  Measures 
Disclosure  issued  by  the  Canadian  Securities  Administrators. 
We  have  included  the  required  disclosures  for  these  non-GAAP 
financial measures, although there is no change to our calculation 
of these measures. 

050

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisINDEX

52  Overview

52  Our Vision
52  Our Business
52  Our Strategy
53  Financial and Operating Highlights
56  Environmental, Social and Governance
59  Reserves and Resources
60  Key Business Developments
63  Outlook for 2022
67  Risks and Risk Management
68  Market Overview
70  Production and Cost Summary

72  Operating Performance

73  Nevada Gold Mines

75  Carlin
77  Cortez
79  Turquoise Ridge
81  Other Mines – Nevada Gold Mines

82  Pueblo Viejo
84  Loulo-Gounkoto
86  Kibali
88  Veladero
90  North Mara
92  Bulyanhulu
94  Other Mines – Gold
95  Other Mines – Copper

95  Growth Project Updates

97  Exploration and Mineral Resource Management

101  Review of Financial Results

101  Revenue
102  Production Costs
103  Capital Expenditures
104  General and Administrative Expenses
104  Exploration, Evaluation and Project Costs
105  Finance Costs, Net
105  Additional Significant Statement of Income Items
106  Income Tax Expense

107  Financial Condition Review

107  Balance Sheet Review
107  Shareholders’ Equity
107  Financial Position and Liquidity
108  Summary of Cash Inflow (Outflow)
109  Summary of Financial Instruments

110  Commitments and Contingencies

110  Review of Quarterly Results

111   Internal Control Over Financial Reporting  

and Disclosure Controls and Procedures

111   IFRS Critical Accounting Policies  

and Accounting Estimates

111   Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

138   Technical Information

138   Endnotes

144   Glossary of Technical Terms

145   Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources Tables

152   Management’s Responsibility

152   Management’s Report on Internal Control  

Over Financial Reporting

153   Independent Auditor’s Report

156   Financial Statements

161   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 051

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW
Our Vision
We  strive  to  be  the  world’s  most  valued  gold  mining  business 
by  finding,  developing  and  owning  the  best  assets,  with  the  best 
people, to deliver sustainable returns for our owners and partners.

Our Business
Barrick  is  one  of  the  world’s  leading  gold  mining  companies  with 
annual  gold  production  and  gold  reserves  that  are  among  the 
largest in the industry. We are principally engaged in the production 
and  sale  of  gold  and  copper,  as  well  as  related  activities  such  as 
exploration and mine development. We hold ownership interests in 
thirteen producing gold mines, including six Tier One Gold Assets1 
and a diversified exploration portfolio positioned for growth in many 
of  the  world’s  most  prolific  gold  districts.  These  gold  mines  are 
geographically  diversified  and  are  located  in  Argentina,  Canada, 
Côte  d’Ivoire,  the  Democratic  Republic  of  Congo,  the  Dominican 
Republic, Mali, Tanzania and the United States. Our mine in Papua 
New Guinea was placed on care and maintenance in April 2020. Our 
three copper mines are located in Zambia, Chile and Saudi Arabia. 
Our  exploration  and  development  projects  are  located  throughout 
the Americas and Africa. We sell our production in the world market 
through  the  following  distribution  channels:  gold  bullion  is  sold  in 
the gold spot market or to independent refineries; gold and copper 
concentrate is sold to independent smelting or trading companies; 
and  copper  cathode  is  sold  to  third-party  purchasers  or  on 
exchange.  Barrick  shares  trade  on  the  New York  Stock  Exchange 
under the symbol GOLD and the Toronto Stock Exchange under the 
symbol ABX.

2021 REVENUE ($ millions)

Our Strategy
Our  strategy  is  to  operate  as  business  owners  by  attracting  and 
developing world-class people who understand and are involved in 
the  value  chain  of  the  business,  act  with  integrity  and  are  tireless 
in  their  pursuit  of  excellence.  We  are  focused  on  returns  to  our 
stakeholders by optimizing free cash flow, managing risk to create 
long-term  value  for  our  shareholders  and  partnering  with  host 
governments and our local communities to transform their country’s 
natural  resources  into  sustainable  benefits  and  mutual  prosperity. 
We aim to achieve this through the following: 

Asset Quality
	Q Grow and invest in a portfolio of Tier One Gold Assets1, Tier Two 
Gold Assets2,  Tier  One  Copper Assets3  and  Strategic Assets4 
with  an  emphasis  on  organic  growth  to  leverage  our  existing 
footprint.  We  will  focus  our  efforts  on  identifying,  investing  in 
and  developing  assets  that  meet  our  investment  criteria.  The 
required internal rate of return (“IRR”) for Tier One Gold Assets 
and Tier Two Gold Assets is 15% and 20%, respectively, based 
on  our  long-term  gold  price  assumption.  The  required  IRR  for 
Tier One Copper Assets is 15% based on our long-term copper 
price  assumption.  A  Tier  One  Gold  Asset  is  an  asset  with  a 
reserve  potential  to  deliver  a  minimum  10-year  life,  annual 
production  of  at  least  500,000  ounces  of  gold  and  total  cash 
costs per ounce6 over the mine life that are in the lower half of 
the industry cost curve. A Tier Two Gold Asset is an asset with 
a  reserve  potential  to  deliver  a  minimum  10-year  life,  annual 
production  of  at  least  250,000  ounces  of  gold  and  total  cash 
costs per ounce6 over the mine life that are in the lower half of 
the  industry  cost  curve. A  Tier  One  Copper Asset  is  an  asset 
with  a  reserve  potential  of  greater  than  five  million  tonnes  of 
contained copper and C1 cash costs per pound6 over the mine 
life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve.

	Q Invest in exploration across extensive land positions in many of 

the world’s most prolific gold and copper districts.

	Q Maximize the long-term value of our strategic Copper Business5. 
	Q Sell non-core assets over time in a disciplined manner.

Gold $10,738

Copper $962

Operational Excellence
	Q Strive for zero harm workplaces.
	Q Operate  a  flat  management  structure  with  a  strong  ownership 

culture. 

Other $285

	Q Streamline management and operations, and hold management 

accountable for the businesses they manage. 

	Q Leverage  innovation  and  technology  to  drive  industry-leading 

efficiencies. 

	Q Build  trust-based  partnerships  with  our  host  governments, 
business  partners,  and  local  communities  to  drive  shared  
long-term value.

Sustainable Profitability
	Q Follow a disciplined approach to growth and proactively manage 
our  impacts  on  the  wider  environment,  emphasizing  long-term 
value for all stakeholders. 

	Q Increase returns to shareholders, driven by a focus on return on 

capital, internal rate of return and free cash flow. 

Numerical annotations throughout the text of this document refer to the endnotes found on page 138. 

052

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisFINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

9/30/20

 Change

12/31/19

Financial Results ($ millions)
Revenues

Cost of sales
Net earningsa
Adjusted net earningsb
Adjusted EBITDAb
Adjusted EBITDA marginb,c
Minesite sustaining capital expendituresb,d
Project capital expendituresb,d
Total consolidated capital expendituresd,e
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities marginf
Free cash flowb
Net earnings per share (basic and diluted)
Adjusted net earnings (basic)b per share
Weighted average diluted common shares  

(millions of shares)

Operating Results
Gold production (thousands of ounces)g
Gold sold (thousands of ounces)g
Market gold price ($/oz)
Realized gold priceb,g ($/oz)
Gold cost of sales (Barrick’s share)g,h ($/oz)
Gold total cash costsb,g ($/oz)
Gold all-in sustaining costsb,g ($/oz)
Copper production (millions of pounds)g
Copper sold (millions of pounds)g
Market copper price ($/lb)
Realized copper priceb,g ($/lb)
Copper cost of sales (Barrick’s share)g,i ($/lb)
Copper C1 cash costsb,g ($/lb)
Copper all-in sustaining costsb,g ($/lb)

Financial Position ($ millions)
Debt (current and long-term)

Cash and equivalents

Debt, net of cash

3,310

1,905

726

626

2,070

63%

431

234
669

2,826

1,768

347

419

1,669

59%

386

179
569

1,387

1,050

42%

718

0.41

0.35

37%

481

0.20

0.24

17%

8%

109%

49%

24%

7%

12%

31%
18%

32%

14%

49%

105%

46%

11,985

12,595

7,089

2,022

2,065

7,258

61%

1,673

747
2,435

4,378

37%

1,943

1.14

1.16

7,417

2,324

2,042

7,492

59%

1,559

471
2,054

5,417

43%

3,363

1.31

1.15

1,779

1,779

0%

1,779

1,778

1,203
1,234
1,795

1,793

1,075

715

971

126

113
4.40

4.63

2.21
1.63

2.92
As at 
12/31/21

1,092
1,071
1,790

1,771

1,122

739

1,034

100

101
4.25

3.98

2.57
1.85

2.60

10%
15%
0%

1%

(4%)

(3%)

(6%)

26%

12%
4%

16%

(14%)
(12%)

12%

As at 
9/30/21

Change

4,437
4,468
1,799

1,790

1,093

725

1,026

415

423
4.23

4.32

2.32
1.72

2.62
As at
12/31/21

4,760
4,879
1,770

1,778

1,056

699

967

457

457
2.80

2.92

2.02
1.54

2.23

(5%)

(4%)

(13%)

1%

(3%)

3%

7%

59%
19%

(19%)

(14%)

(42%)

(13%)

1%

0%

(7%)
(8%)
2%

1%

4%

4%

6%

(9%)

(7%)
51%

48%

15%
12%

17%

9,717

6,911

3,969

902

4,833

50%

1,320

370
1,701

2,833

29%

1,132

2.26

0.51

1,758

5,465
5,467
1,393

1,396

1,005

671

894

432

355
2.72

2.77

2.14
1.69

2.52

As at 
12/31/20

Change

As at 
12/31/19

5,150

5,280

(130)

5,154

5,043

111

0%

5%

(217%)

5,150

5,280

(130)

5,155

5,188

0%

2%

(33)

294%

5,536

3,314

2,222

a.  Net earnings represents net earnings attributable to the equity holders of the Company.
b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue.
d.   Amounts presented on a consolidated cash basis. Project capital expenditures are included in our calculation of all-in costs, but not included in our calculation 

of all-in sustaining costs.

e.   Total  consolidated  capital  expenditures  also  includes  capitalized  interest  of  $4  million  and  $15  million,  respectively,  for  the  three  months  and  year  ended 

December 31, 2021 (September 30, 2021: $4 million; 2020: $24 million; 2019: $11 million).

f.  Represents net cash provided by operating activities divided by revenue.
g.  On an attributable basis.
h.   Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces 

sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). 

i.   Copper  cost  of  sales  per  pound  is  calculated  as  cost  of  sales  across  our  copper  operations  divided  by  pounds  sold  (both  on  an  attributable  basis  using 

Barrick’s ownership share). 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 053

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
GOLD PRODUCTIONa (thousands of ounces)

COPPER PRODUCTIONa (millions of pounds)

5,465

4,760

4,437

4,200
to
4,600

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

500

400

300

200

100

0

432

457

423

420
to
470

2019

2020

2021

2022 (est)b

2019

2020

2021

2022 (est)b

GOLD COST OF SALESc, TOTAL CASH COSTSd,
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTSd ($ per ounce)

COPPER COST OF SALESc, C1 CASH COSTSd,
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTSd ($ per pound)

1,093

1,026

725

967

699

1,070
to
1,150

1,040
to
1,120

730
to
790

1,000

1,005

1,056

894

671

500

0

3.00

2.00

1.00

0

2.14

2.52

1.69

2.02

2.23

1.54

2.32

2.62

1.72

2019

2020

2021

2022 (est)b

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

2019

2020

Cost of Sales

C1 Cash Costs

2021
AISC

ADJUSTED EBITDAd AND 
ADJUSTED EBITDA MARGINe

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ($ millions) 

2.20
to
2.50

2.70
to
3.00

1.70
to
1.90

2022 (est)b

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

50%

4,833

2019

59%

7,492

61%

7,258

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2,435

2,054

1,951

1,701

1,512

1,651

2020

2021

2019

2020

2021

Adjusted EBITDA ($ millions)

Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)

Attributable minesite sustainingd
Attributable projectd

Consolidated minesite sustainingd 
Consolidated projectd 

OPERATING CASH FLOW AND FREE CASH FLOWd

SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTIONSf (cents per share) 

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

1,393

2,833

1,132

1,770

5,417

3,363

1,799

4,378

1,943

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

80

60

40

20

0

2019

2020

2021

20

2019

33

2020

42

37

2021

Operating Cash Flow ($ millions)
Gold Market Price ($/oz)

Free Cash Flow ($ millions)

Dividend

Return of Capital

a.  On an attributable basis. 
b.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range. 
c.   Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces 

sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

d.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
e.  Represents adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue.
f.  Dividend per share declared in respect of the stated period. Return of capital distribution was paid contemporaneously with the dividend for that period. 

054

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisFactors affecting net earnings and adjusted net earnings6 – 
three months ended December 31, 2021 versus  
September 30, 2021 
Net earnings attributable to equity holders of Barrick (“net earnings”) 
for the three months ended December 31, 2021 were $726 million 
compared  to  $347  million  in  the  prior  quarter.  The  increase  was 
primarily  due  to  a  $205  million  gain  on  the  sale  of  Lone  Tree  in 
addition to the drivers described immediately below. 

After adjusting for items that are not indicative of future operating 
earnings,  adjusted  net  earnings6  of  $626  million  for  the  three 
months  ended  December  31,  2021  was  $207  million  higher  than 
the prior quarter. The increase in adjusted net earnings6 was mainly 
due  to  an  increase  in  gold  sales  volumes  and  lower  cost  of  sales 
per ounce/pound6. This was combined with a higher realized copper 
price6 of $4.63 per pound for the three months ended December 31, 
2021,  compared  to  $3.98  per  pound  in  the  prior  quarter  and  to  a 
lesser extent, a higher realized gold price6 of $1,793 per ounce for 
the three months ended December 31, 2021, compared to $1,771 
per ounce in the prior quarter. 

The  significant  adjusting  item  in  the  three  months  ended 
December 31, 2021 was $109 million ($198 million before tax and 
non-controlling  interest)  in  acquisition/disposition  gains,  primarily 
resulting from the sale of Lone Tree. 

Refer to page 112 for a full list of reconciling items between net 
earnings  and  adjusted  net  earnings6  for  the  current  and  previous 
periods.

Factors affecting net earnings and adjusted net earnings6 – 
year ended December 31, 2021 versus December 31, 2020 
Net  earnings  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021  were  $2,022 
million compared to $2,324 million in the prior year. The decrease 
was primarily due to:

	Q a net impairment reversal of $91 million ($304 million before tax) 
resulting from the Framework Agreement with the Government 
of Tanzania (“GoT”) being signed and made effective in the first 
quarter of 2020 occurring in the prior year;

	Q a gain of $172 million ($180 million before tax and non-controlling 
interest) in acquisitions/dispositions, primarily resulting from the 
sale  of  Eskay  Creek,  Massawa,  Morila  and  Bullfrog,  occurring 
in the prior year; 

	Q a gain of $104 million (no tax impact) on the remeasurement of 
the  residual  cash  liability  relating  to  our  silver  sale  agreement 
with  Wheaton  Precious  Metals  (“Wheaton”),  occurring  in  the 
prior year; and

	Q $125  million  in  current  year  significant  tax  expense  items 
mainly  due  to  deferred  tax  expense  as  a  result  of  tax  reform 
measures in Argentina, the foreign exchange impact on current 
tax  expense  in  Peru  and  the  remeasurement  of  current  and 
deferred  tax  balances,  the  acquisition  of  the  40%  interest  in 
South Arturo that Nevada Gold Mines (“NGM”) did not already 
own, the sale of Lagunas Norte, the settlement of the Massawa 
Senegalese tax dispute and the recognition/derecognition of our 
deferred taxes in various jurisdictions compared to $119 million 
of  prior  year  significant  positive  tax  items  related  to  deferred 
tax recoveries as a result of tax reform measures in Argentina 
and adjustments made in recognition of the net settlement of all 
outstanding disputes with the GoT. 

These  impacts  were  partially  offset  by  current  year  positive  items 
consisting of:

	Q a gain of $94 million ($213 million before tax and non-controlling 
interest) in acquisition/disposition gains, primarily resulting from 
the sale of Lone Tree; and

	Q an  impairment  reversal  of  $64  million  ($63  million  before  tax 
and non-controlling interests), primarily resulting from the sale 
of  our  100%  interest  in  the  Lagunas  Norte  mine,  occurring  in 
the current year.

After  adjusting  for  items  that  are  not  indicative  of  future 
operating  earnings,  adjusted  net  earnings6  of  $2,065  million  for 
the  year  ended  December  31,  2021  was  $23  million  higher  than 
the prior year. The increase in adjusted net earnings6 was primarily 
due to a higher realized copper price6 of $4.32 per pound in 2021 
compared to $2.92 per pound in the prior year and to a lesser extent, 
a higher realized gold price6 of $1,790 per ounce in 2021 compared 
to $1,778 per ounce in the prior year. These impacts were largely 
offset by a decrease in gold and copper sales volumes and higher 
cost of sales per ounce/pound7. 

Refer  to  page  112  for  a  full  list  of  reconciling  items  between  
net  earnings  and  adjusted  net  earnings6  for  the  current  and  
previous periods.

Factors affecting Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow6 – 
three months ended December 31, 2021 versus  
September 30, 2021
In  the  three  months  ended  December  31,  2021,  we  generated 
$1,387  million  in  operating  cash  flow,  compared  to  $1,050  million 
in the prior quarter. The increase of $337 million was primarily due 
to  lower  cash  taxes  paid,  combined  with  an  increase  in  realized 
gold  and  copper  prices6  as  well  as  higher  gold  and  copper  sales 
volumes. Operating cash flow was further impacted by lower cost of 
sales per ounce/pound7. These impacts were partially offset by an 
unfavorable  movement  in  working  capital,  mainly  in  other  current 
assets  and  receivables,  which  was  partially  offset  by  a  favorable 
movement in inventory.

Free cash flow6 for the three months ended December 31, 2021 
was  $718  million,  compared  to  $481  million  in  the  prior  quarter, 
reflecting  higher  operating  cash  flows,  partially  offset  by  higher 
capital expenditures. In the three months ended December 31, 2021, 
capital expenditures on a cash basis were $669 million compared to 
$569 million in the prior quarter due to an increase in both minesite 
sustaining capital expenditures6 and project capital expenditures6. 
The increase in minesite sustaining capital expenditures6 is primarily 
at Lumwana due to new mining equipment and stripping, at North 
Mara  resulting  from  the  initial  capital  spend  on  the  restart  of  the 
open-pit  mine  and  at  Bulyanhulu,  mainly  related  to  the  long-term 
underground fleet. Higher project capital expenditures6 is attributed 
to  the  plant  expansion  and  mine  life  extension  project  at  Pueblo 
Viejo, the development of the third underground mine and expansion 
of  power  capacity  at  Loulo-Gounkoto,  and  the  commencement  of 
construction for the Phase 7A leach pad at Veladero. 

Factors affecting Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow6 – 
year ended December 31, 2021 versus December 31, 2020
For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  we  generated  $4,378 
million  in  operating  cash  flow,  compared  to  $5,417  million  in  the 
prior  year.  The  decrease  of  $1,039  million  was  primarily  due  to 
higher cash taxes paid, lower gold and copper sales volumes and 
higher cost of sales per ounce/pound7. This was partially offset by 
higher realized gold and copper prices6.

For  2021,  we  generated  free  cash  flow6  of  $1,943  million 
compared  to  $3,363  million  in  the  prior  year.  The  decrease 
primarily  reflects  lower  operating  cash  flows  and  higher  capital 
expenditures.  In  2021,  capital  expenditures  on  a  cash  basis 
were  $2,435  million  compared  to  $2,054  million  in  the  prior  year, 
mainly due to higher project capital expenditures6. The increase in 
project  capital  expenditures6  is  mainly  attributable  to  the  Pueblo 
Viejo  plant  expansion  and  mine  life  extension  project,  as  well  as 
the  development  of  the  third  underground  mine  and  expansion  of 
power capacity at Loulo-Gounkoto, partially offset by a decrease at 
Carlin  due  to  lower  cost  development  and  exploration  activities  at 
Goldrush underground. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 055

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisEnvironmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)
At Barrick, sustainability is entrenched in our DNA. 

Our  sustainability  strategy  has  four  main  pillars:  (1)  ensuring 
we  respect  human  rights;  (2)  protecting  the  health  and  safety  of 
our  people  and  local  communities;  (3)  sharing  the  benefits  of  our 
operations; and (4) managing our impacts on the environment. 

We implement this strategy by blending top-down accountability 
with  bottom-up  responsibility.  This  means  we  place  the  day-to-
day  ownership  of  sustainability,  and  the  associated  risks  and 
opportunities, in the hands of individual sites. In the same way that 
each  site  must  manage  its  geological,  operational  and  technical 
capabilities to meet business objectives, it must also manage and 
identify programs, metrics, and targets that measure progress and 
deliver real value for the business and our stakeholders, including 
our host countries and local communities. The Group Sustainability 
Executive,  supported  by  regional  sustainability  leads,  provides 
oversight  and  direction  over  this  site-level  ownership,  to  ensure 
alignment with the strategic priorities of the overall business.

Governance
The  bedrock  of  our  sustainability  strategy  is  strong  governance. 
We  established 
the  Environmental  and  Social  Oversight  
Committee  (“E&S  Committee”)  to  connect  site-level  ownership  of  
our  sustainability  strategy  with  the  leadership  of  the  Group.  It 
is  chaired  by  the  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  and 
includes:  (1)  regional  Chief  Operating  Officers;  (2)  minesite 
General  Managers;  (3)  Health,  Safety,  Environment  and  Closure 
Leads;  (4)  the  Group  Sustainability  Executive;  (5)  in-house  legal 
counsel;  and  (6)  an  independent  sustainability  consultant  in  an 
advisory  role.  The  E&S  Committee  meets  on  a  quarterly  basis 
to  review  our  performance  across  a  range  of  key  performance 
indicators,  and  to  provide  independent  oversight  and  review  of  
sustainability management.

The President and Chief Executive Officer reviews the reports 
of  the  E&S  Committee  with  the  Board’s  Environmental,  Social, 
Governance  &  Nominating  Committee  (“ESG  &  Nominating 
Committee”),  formerly  known  as  the  Corporate  Governance  & 
Nominating  Committee.  The  change  to  this  Committee’s  name 
was  approved  by  the  Board  on  February  15,  2022,  to  better 
reflect 
in  overseeing 
Barrick’s  sustainability  performance.  The  reports  are  reviewed  to 
ensure  the  implementation  of  our  sustainability  policies  and  drive 
performance  of  our  environmental,  health  and  safety,  corporate 
social responsibility, and human rights programs. 

this  Committee  plays 

the  critical  role 

This is supplemented by weekly meetings, at a minimum, between 
the  Regional  Sustainability  Leads  and  the  Group  Sustainability 
Executive. These meetings examine the sustainability-related risks 
and  opportunities  facing  the  business  in  real  time,  as  well  as  the 
progress  and  issues  integrated  into  weekly  Executive  Committee 
review meetings. 

Sustainability is a fundamental business priority for the company 
and  this  was  reflected  in  the  S&P  Global  Corporate  Sustainability 
Assessment  as  Barrick  retained  its  listing  in  the  prestigious  Dow 
Jones  Sustainability  Index’s  (“DJSI”)  World  Index,  ranking  in  the 
95th percentile of all mining companies assessed.

This is the 14th consecutive year Barrick has been listed in the 
DJSI World Index, in which 2,500 companies are evaluated against 
governance,  social  performance,  environmental  management  and 
economic contribution factors to identify the top 10 percent or “best 
in class” performers in every industry. The DJSI World Index is the 
longest-running global sustainability benchmark worldwide and has 
become the key reference point in sustainability investment. 

Our  strong  performance  was  demonstrated  by  scoring  full 
marks  (100th  percentile)  in  the  categories  of  environmental 
reporting,  water-related  risks,  social  reporting  and  human  rights, 
and improved scores in policy influence, operational eco-efficiency, 
biodiversity and occupational health and safety.

This performance reinforces our sustainability strategy, policies, 
procedures  and  management  and  is  reflected  in  some  of  our 
performance  metrics  through  the  year,  with  a  trend  of  continued 
performance improvement since the merger of Barrick and Randgold 
Resources (the “Merger”). 

056

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Throughout  the  year,  we  have  been  tracking  our  progress 
against  our  Sustainability  Scorecard,  which  we  introduced  as  part 
of  our  2019  Sustainability  Report.  Our  motivation  for  developing 
the  scorecard  was  to  both  transparently  disclose  to  external 
stakeholders what we viewed as the most important ESG metrics in 
the industry and our performance against them, while also driving 
internal improvement at a regional and site level. 

Our performance on the scorecard accounts for 25% of the long-
term incentive awards for senior leaders in 2021 as part of the Barrick 
Partnership Plan. Overall, we have improved our score and were it 
not for the tragic fatalities late in the year we would have seen an 
increase in our grade to A. We, however, have a zero tolerance for 
fatalities and as a result remain at a B grade, unchanged from 2020 
(on a scale where A represents top performance and E represents 
bottom performance). As we strive for continued performance, the 
2022 Sustainability Scorecard targets and metrics will be updated. 
In  late  2021  and  early  2022,  we  actively  sought  feedback 
by  reaching  out  to  a  number  of  our  largest  shareholders  owning 
over  30%  of  our  issued  and  outstanding  common  shares  (as 
of  December  31,  2021).  Our  Lead  Director  and  the  Chair  of  the 
Compensation  Committee  participated 
these  discussions 
which  covered  a  variety  of  topics,  including  our  performance, 
sustainability  strategy,  environmental  goals,  human  capital 
strategy, continued active oversight during the Covid-19 pandemic, 
and  executive  compensation  matters,  as  well  as  key  governance 
priorities, including Board composition and renewal. The meetings 
were an instructive two-way discussion where we heard about our 
shareholders’ priorities, discussed Barrick’s sustainability vision and 
provided  an  opportunity  for  our  performance  to  be  constructively 
challenged. Sustainability-related topics and key areas of concern 
are  shared  and  provided  as  part  of  our  annual  ESG  materiality 
assessment. 

in 

Human rights
In December 2021, coinciding with the United Nations International 
Human  Rights  Day,  we  published  our  first,  post-Merger,  Human 
Rights Report. This report details how we embed our human rights 
policy throughout the organization and our commitment to respect 
human rights at every site. We have zero tolerance for human rights 
violations wherever we operate. We avoid causing or contributing to 
human rights violations and facilitate access to remedies. 

The  report  follows  the  United  Nations  Guiding  Principles 
(“UNGP”)  Reporting  Framework  and  described  some  of  the 
challenges  faced  and  lessons  learned  as  we  work  to  continually 
improve our human rights performance. 

Our  commitment  to  respect  human  rights  is  fulfilled  on  the 
ground via our Human Rights Program, the fundamental principles 
of which include: monitoring and reporting, due diligence, training, 
and disciplinary action and remedy.

We  continue  to  provide  security  and  human  rights  training  to 
security  forces  across  our  sites.  In  the  first  quarter  of  2022,  we 
will publish our annual Voluntary Principles on Security and Human 
Rights  Plenary  Report,  which  will  include  a  full  detailed  report  as 
part of a three-year reporting cycle. 

Safety
We are committed to the safety, health and well-being of our people, 
their families and the communities in which we operate. Our safety 
vision is “Every person going home safe and healthy every day.” 

To achieve this, we continue to implement our “Journey to Zero 
Harm” initiative. This is focused on engagement with our workforce 
through Visible Felt Leadership, and by aligning and improving our 
standards  across  the  Group,  ensuring  accountability  to  our  safety 
commitments, and ensuring our employees are fit for duty.

We report our safety performance quarterly as both part of our 
E&S  Committee  meetings  and  to  the  Board’s  ESG  &  Nominating 
Committee.  Our  safety  performance  is  a  regular  standing  agenda 
item on our weekly Executive Committee review meeting.

We  achieved  our  target  to  certify  all  operational  sites  to  the 
internationally recognized ISO 45001 standard by the end of 2021. 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
Safety key performance indicators for the fourth quarter of 2021 
include our Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (“LTIFR”)8 at 0.42 and 
our  Total  Recordable  Injury  Frequency  Rate  (“TRIFR”)8  at  1.57. 
Our annual indicators for 2021 was LTIFR at 0.38, a 12% increase 
from 2020, and TRIFR at 1.47, which was an improvement of 13%  
from 2020. 

The  indicator  that  is  the  most  meaningful,  however,  is  the  two 
fatalities we had in 2021. The first was on July 14, 2021, when an 
incident  occurred  at  Hemlo  which  resulted  in  the  tragic  fatality  of 
an employee from our underground mining contractor. The second 
was  on  September  1,  2021,  when  an  incident  at  Tongon  resulted 
in  the  tragic  fatality  of  a  drilling  contractor.  Unfortunately,  we  also 
had an incident on January 17, 2022 at North Mara, which resulted 
in a fatality of a contractor. A full investigation into the cause of the 
fatality is ongoing.

We  have  held  numerous  regional  and  group  workshops  to 
strategize and improve our safety approach and action plans. One 
such  initiative  to  improve  safety  is  its  consideration  as  part  of  the 
recruitment  and  retention  process.  Safety  starts  with  our  people 
and their behavior, and this means ensuring we attract people who  
live  and  demonstrate  safe  behavior  and  do  not  compromise  on 
safety standards.

to 

We  continue 

focus  on  safeguarding  our  employees 
and  operations  from  Covid-19.  Strict  Covid-19  screening  and  
prevention  measures  remain  in  place  at  our  mine  gates,  including 
‘test  to  enter’  policies  at  some  higher  risk  operations.  We  have 
undertaken  extensive  vaccination  awareness  campaigns 
to 
encourage  uptake  of  the  vaccines  by  our  employees.  To  date, 
approximately  59%  of  our  employees  are  fully  vaccinated,  and  a 
further 8% are partially vaccinated.

Social 
We  regard  our  host  communities  and  countries  as  important 
partners  in  our  business.  Our  sustainability  policies  commit 
us  to  transparency  in  our  relationships  with  host  communities, 
government  authorities,  the  public  and  other  key  stakeholders. 
Through these policies, we commit to conducting our business with 
integrity  and  with  absolute  opposition  to  corruption.  We  require 
our suppliers to operate ethically and responsibly as a condition of 
doing business with us.

Community and economic development
Our commitment to social and economic development is set out in 
our overarching Sustainable Development and Social Performance 
policies. The approach is encapsulated in three concepts: 

Paying our fair share of taxes: the taxes, royalties and dividends 
we  pay  provide  significant  income  for  our  host  countries  and  help 
fund  vital  services  and  infrastructure.  We  report  all  government 
and  tax  payments  transparently,  primarily  through  the  reporting 
mechanism  of  the  Canadian  Extractive  Sector  Transparency 
Measures Act  (“ESTMA”).  In  addition,  we  plan  to  publish  our  first 
annual tax contribution report in April 2022 covering the 2021 year, 
which  will  highlight  our  overall  contribution  to  our  host  countries. 
Our  comprehensive 
tax  risk 
management,  tax  planning  principles,  compliance,  relationships 
with tax authorities as well as transparency and disclosure.

tax  policy  covers  governance, 

Prioritizing local hiring and buying: the employment opportunities 
created by our presence in a community is one of our largest social 
and economic contributions to our host communities and countries. 
Our  aim  is  to  maximize  this  contribution.  We  work  to  identify  and 
nurture local talent at every level of our business through a range 
of  skills  and  formal  training.  We  also  strive  to  maximize  the  value 
that  stays  in  our  communities  and  countries  of  operation  through 
procurement processes that prioritize local companies, followed by 
those from the larger region or host country. 

Investing 

in  community-led  development 

initiatives:  we  
believe  that  no  one  knows  the  needs  of  local  communities 
better  than  the  communities  themselves.  We  have  community 
development  committees  (“CDCs”)  established  at  every  operating 

site. The  role  of  the  CDC  is  to  allocate  the  community  investment 
budget to those projects and initiatives most needed and desired by 
local stakeholders. Each CDC is elected and made up of a mix of 
local leaders, community members, as well as representatives from 
local women and youth groups. 

For  2021,  we  invested  approximately  $26.5  million  in  local 
community  development  projects.  Some  community  initiatives 
include the following:

	Q At NGM, a Cultural Awareness video was created in partnership 
with the local Tribes to better educate the workforce on cultural 
awareness. This video was a request from Tribal Leaders in our 
partnering communities due to the mine sites being located on 
or around traditionally inhabited lands of the Western Shoshone, 
Northern Paiute, and Goshute people. The video will be used to 
train NGM’s entire workforce on an annual basis. 

	Q At Veladero, seven water treatment plants were commissioned 
in Bella Vista and Villa Iglesia to provide potable water for the 
communities. Beneficiaries include over 7,000 people from Iglesia. 
	Q At  Loulo-Gounkoto,  we  undertook  a  socioeconomic  study 
and  validation  workshop  to  understand  community  needs  and 
identify major projects for development. Outputs will be used to 
issue a 5-year development plan for Kenieba.

Environment
Being  responsible  stewards  of  the  environment  is  the  third  pillar 
of  our  sustainability  strategy.  Environmental  matters  such  as  how 
we  use  water,  prevent  incidents,  manage  tailings,  respond  to  a 
changing climate, and protection of biodiversity are key focuses.

We maintained our strong track record of stewardship and did 

not record any Class 19 environmental incidents throughout 2021. 

Climate Change
The  Board’s  ESG  &  Nominating  Committee  is  responsible  for 
overseeing  Barrick’s  policies,  programs  and  performance  relating 
to  the  environment,  including  climate  change.  The  Audit  &  Risk 
Committee assists the Board in overseeing the Group’s management 
of  enterprise  risks  as  well  as  the  implementation  of  policies  and 
standards for monitoring and mitigating such risks. Climate change 
is built into our formal risk management process, outputs of which 
are regularly reviewed by the Audit & Risk Committee.

Barrick’s climate change strategy has three pillars: (1) identify, 
understand and mitigate the risks associated with climate change; 
(2)  measure  and  reduce  our  impacts  on  climate  change;  and  
(3) improve our disclosure on climate change. Our climate disclosure 
is  based  on  the  recommendations  of  the  Task  Force  for  Climate-
related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”).

We are also acutely aware of the impacts that climate change 
has on our host communities and countries, particularly developing 
nations  who  are  often  most  vulnerable.  As  the  world  economy 
transitions  to  renewable  power,  it  is  imperative  that  developing 
nations  are  not  left  behind.  As  a  responsible  business,  we  have 
focused  our  efforts  on  building  resilience  in  our  host  communities 
and countries, just as we do for our business.

Identify, understand and mitigate the risks associated  
with climate change
We identify and manage risks, build resilience to climate change, as 
well  as  position  ourselves  for  new  opportunities.  Climate  change-
related  factors  continue  to  be  incorporated  into  our  formal  risk 
assessment  process.  We  have  identified  several  climate-related 
risks and opportunities for our business including: physical impacts 
of climate change; an increase in regulations that seek to address 
climate change; and an increase in global investment in innovation 
and low-carbon technologies. The risk assessment process includes 
scenario analysis, which is being rolled out to all sites with an initial 
focus on our Tier One Gold Assets1, to assess site-specific climate 
related risks and opportunities.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 057

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisMeasure and reduce the Group’s impact on climate change
Mining  is  an  energy-intensive  business,  and  we  understand  the 
important  link  between  energy  use  and  greenhouse  gas  (“GHG”) 
emissions.  By  measuring  and  effectively  managing  our  energy 
use,  we  can  reduce  our  GHG  emissions,  achieve  more  efficient 
production, and reduce our costs. 

identifying  roadmaps  and  assessing 

We  have  climate  champions  at  each  site  that  are  tasked 
with 
for  our 
GHG  emissions  reductions  and  carbon  offsets  for  hard-to-abate 
emissions. Any carbon offsets that we pursue must have appropriate 
socioeconomic and/or biodiversity benefits. We have published an 
achievable  emissions  reduction  roadmap  and  continue  to  assess 
further reduction opportunities across our operations.

feasibility 

either  in  terms  of  water  scarcity  or  surplus  water.  Understanding 
the  water  stress  in  the  regions  we  operate  enables  us  to  better 
understand  the  risks  and  manage  our  water  resources  through 
site-specific water balances, based on the International Council on 
Mining and Metals’ (“ICMM”) Water Accounting Framework, aimed 
at minimizing our water withdrawal and maximizing water reuse and 
recycling within our operations.

We 

include  each  mine’s  water  risks 

its  operational  
risk  register.  These  risks  are  then  aggregated  and  incorporated 
into  the  corporate  risk  register.  Our  identified  water-related  risks 
include:  (1)  managing  excess  water  in  regions  with  high  rainfall; 
(2) maintaining access to water in arid areas and regions prone to 
water scarcity; and (3) regulatory risks related to permitting limits as 
well as municipal and national regulations for water use.

in 

Improve our disclosure on climate change 
As  part  of  our  commitment  to  improve  our  disclosure  on  climate 
change,  we  complete  the  annual  CDP  (formerly  known  as  the 
Carbon  Disclosure  Project)  Climate  Change  and  Water  Security 
questionnaires.  This  ensures  our  investor-relevant  water  use, 
emissions and climate data is widely available. 

Our CDP scores were positive and although we maintained our 
B score for Water Security, we improved our Climate Change score 
a  full  grade  from  a  C  in  2020  to  B  in  2021.  We  are  also  pleased 
to  score  as  industry  leaders  for  several  indicators.  For  Climate 
Change, we scored as industry leaders for Governance, Emission 
Reduction  Initiatives, as well as Scope 1 & 2 Emissions. Similarly 
we achieved industry leader scores in Water-Related Opportunities, 
Integrated  Approach  to  Environmental  Challenges  and  Business 
Impacts for Water Security.

Emissions
As  detailed  in  our  2020  Sustainability  Report,  Barrick’s  GHG 
emissions  reduction  target  is  for  a  minimum  30%  reduction  by 
2030,  while  maintaining  a  steady  production  profile.  The  basis  of 
this reduction is against a 2018 baseline of 7,541 kt CO2-e. 

Our emissions reduction target is grounded in climate science 
and has a detailed pathway for achievement. Our target is not static 
and will be updated as we continue to identify and implement new 
GHG reduction opportunities. 

Ultimately,  our  vision  is  net  zero  GHG  emissions  by  2050, 
achieved  primarily  through  GHG  reductions,  with  some  offsets 
for  hard-to-abate  emissions.  Site-level  plans  to  improve  energy 
efficiency,  integrate  clean  and  renewable  energy  sources  and 
reduce  GHG  emissions  will  also  be  strengthened,  and  we  plan  to 
supplement our corporate emissions reduction target with context-
based site-specific emissions reduction targets. 

Our  GHG  emissions  for  2021  were  7,096kt  CO2-e10  (Scope  1 
and  Scope  2:  Market-Based),  representing  a  5.9%  reduction  from 
our  2018  baseline.  The  reduction  in  our  market-based  emissions 
are due to the extensive effort by Nevada Gold Mines to implement 
Power Purchase Agreements that prioritize renewable energy and 
maximize power usage from our own power plants. 

Water
Water is a vital and increasingly scarce global resource. Managing 
and using water responsibly is one of the most critical parts of our 
sustainability  strategy.  Our  commitment  to  responsible  water  use 
is  codified  in  our  Environmental  Policy.  Steady,  reliable  access  to 
water  is  critical  to  the  effective  operation  of  our  mines. Access  to 
water is also a fundamental human right. 

In 2021, we reviewed our definition of water stress against global 
reporting, disclosure frameworks and tools which helped define our 
operations that are exposed or potentially exposed to water stress, 

We are pleased that our 2021 water recycling and reuse rate of 

83% was above our annual target of 80%. 

Tailings
We are committed to ensuring our tailings storage facilities (“TSFs”) 
meet  global  best  practices  for  safety.  Our  TSFs  are  carefully 
engineered  and  regularly  inspected,  particularly  those  in  regions 
with high rainfall and seismic events. 

We continue to progress our compliance to the Global Industry 
Standard for Tailings Management (“GISTM”), and have completed 
the  consequence  classification  for  a  majority  of  sites.  Sites  are 
currently working to complete a gap assessment against the GISTM 
using the Conformance Protocols developed by the ICMM. 

Since  we  assumed  operating  control  of  the  mines  previously 
managed by Acacia Mining plc (“Acacia”) in 2019, a critical project 
has been the corrective management and responsible operations of 
the  North  Mara  TSF. At  the  time  we  assumed  operational  control, 
the  TSF  had  7.5  million  cubic  meters  of  water  and  was  operating 
well above its design capacity; an Environmental Protection Order 
had  been  issued  to Acacia  by  the  authorities  to  close  the TSF. To 
safely  reopen  the  TSF,  one  of  the  commitments  agreed  between 
Barrick  and  the  Government  of Tanzania  was  to  reduce  the  water 
in the TSF to below 800,000 cubic meters by the end of 2021. After 
an  exceptional  team  effort,  approximately  $60  million  in  capital 
investment  for  water  treatment,  as  well  as  extensive  studies,  we 
achieved the target ahead of schedule.

Biodiversity
Biodiversity  underpins  many  of  the  ecosystem  services  on  which 
our mines and their surrounding communities depend. If improperly 
managed,  mining  and  exploration  activities  have  the  potential  to 
negatively  affect  biodiversity  and  ecosystem  services.  We  work 
to  proactively  manage  our  impact  on  biodiversity  and  strive  to 
protect  the  ecosystems  in  which  we  operate.  Wherever  possible, 
we aim to achieve a net neutral biodiversity impact, particularly for 
ecologically sensitive environments. 

We  established  a  target  to  develop  Biodiversity  Action  Plans 
(“BAPs”) for all our operational sites by the end of 2021. We achieved  
this target and are in the process of implementing these BAPs, which  
outline  our  strategy  to  achieve  net-neutral  impacts  and  associated 
management plans. In 2021, we disclosed our first CDP questionnaire 
for  forests,  which  incorporates  biodiversity  disclosures.  Although 
the  CDP  forests  questionnaires  are  not  yet  scored  for  the  metals 
and mining industry, we feel biodiversity disclosures are imperative 
for the industry and are currently under-reported. 

We have made progress in developing conservation and offset 
projects, including sagebrush and mule habitats in Nevada, forestry 
conservation in Zambia and establishing a partnership at the Fina 
Reserve in Mali. 

058

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisReserves and Resources11
For full details of our mineral reserves and mineral resources, refer 
to page 145.

ATTRIBUTABLE CONTAINED  
GOLD RESERVES12,13,a (Moz)

Gold Reserves
Barrick’s  2021  mineral  reserves  are  estimated  using  a  gold  price 
assumption  of  $1,200  per  ounce  and  are  reported  to  a  rounding 
standard of two significant digits, both unchanged from 2020. As of 
December  31,  2021,  Barrick’s  proven  and  probable  gold  reserves 
were 69 million ounces12 at an average grade of 1.71 g/t, compared 
to 68 million ounces13 at an average grade of 1.66 g/t in 2020. Year-
over-year, grade has increased by approximately 3%, while reserves 
have increased by approximately 1.5%. Notably, this year-over-year 
change  incorporates  the  net  removal  of  0.91  million  ounces  from 
mineral reserves, due to the expected change in our equity interest 
in Porgera from 47.5% to 24.5%, partially offset by the net impact of 
the asset exchange of Lone Tree to i-80 Gold for the remaining 40% 
of South Arturo that NGM did not already own. Excluding the impact 
of  these  changes,  reserve  replacement  was  150%  of  depletion. 
Similarly, when adjusting for the above ownership changes, the net 
increase in reserves year-over-year is approximately 3%.

Mineral reserve growth, net of depletion, was achieved at three 
of  Barrick’s Tier  One  Gold Assets1  –  Kibali,  Cortez  and Turquoise 
Ridge  –  while  Bulyanhulu,  North  Mara,  and  Phoenix  also  all 
achieved  this  milestone.  This  further  moves  the  Bulyanhulu  and 
North Mara mines closer to potential Tier One status as a combined 
complex, while the Covid-19 pandemic continued to impact drilling 
activities  at  Veladero.  Our  core  focus  on  geological  modeling  is 
delivering results with year-over-year mineral reserves growing, net 
of depletion. 

During 2021, the Company converted a net of 8.1 million ounces 
to attributable proven and probable reserves. Compared to mining 
depletion of 5.4 million ounces, this represents an impressive 150% 
replacement of ounces. 

The Africa & Middle East region converted a net of 3.1 million 
ounces  to  attributable  proven  and  probable  reserves,  before 
depletion,  with  contributions  from  Loulo-Gounkoto,  Kibali,  North 
Mara,  Bulyanhulu  and  Tongon.  At  Loulo-Gounkoto,  this  was 
principally  from  extensions  at  the  Yalea,  Gara  and  Gounkoto 
underground  mines.  At  Kibali,  this  was  driven  by  the  addition 
and  expansion  of  multiple  open  pits,  together  with  the  Karagba, 
Chauffeur and Durba (“KCD”) underground extensions of the 3,000 
and  9,000  lodes.  Given  the  year-over-year  growth  from  the  open 
pits,  the  average  grade  of  proven  and  probable  mineral  reserves 
at  Kibali  has  decreased  from  3.84  g/t  to  3.60  g/t.  However,  this 
growth  continues  to  support  a  balanced  and  flexible  underground 
and open-pit feed blend. We have now achieved a similar optimized 
and  balanced  life  of  mine  profile  at  North  Mara,  with  conversions 
in 2021 driven by extensions to the Gokona, Gena and Rama pits.

The North America region converted a net of 5.3 million ounces 
to attributable proven and probable reserves, primarily from Cortez 
and  Turquoise  Ridge,  before  depletion. At  Cortez,  the  increase  in 
reserves was driven by the completion of the Goldrush Underground 
feasibility study, while additions at Turquoise Ridge were driven by 
improvements  to  geological  models.  The  core  focus  on  improving 
geological  models  is  a  key  contributor  to  mineral  resource  and 
reserve growth at Nevada Gold Mines. 

  In  the  Latin  America  &  Asia  Pacific  region,  there  was  a  net 
reduction of 0.3 million ounces before depletion in 2021, mainly as 
the drilling required to convert resources into reserves was unable 
to  be  completed  due  to  the  impact  of  Covid-19  at  Veladero.  The 
potential  for  reserve  conversion  remains  at  Pueblo  Viejo,  where 
a  significant  indicated  resource  base  requires  the  completion 
of  a  tailings  expansion  study  to  support  the  potential  conversion 
to  reserves.  For  further  information  on  the  Pueblo  Viejo  Plant 
Expansion  and  Mine  Life  Extension  Project,  please  refer  to  the 
Growth Project Updates section of this MD&A. 

8.1

69

68

-0.91

-5.4

50

0

2020

Acquisition/
Disposition

Depletion

Net
Conversion

2021

a.  Figures rounded to two significant digits.

Gold Resources
In  2021,  all  mineral  resources  were  estimated  using  a  gold  price 
assumption  of  $1,500  per  ounce,  unchanged  from  2020.  Barrick’s 
mineral resources for 2021 continue to be reported on an inclusive 
basis, incorporating all areas that form mineral reserves. All open-
pit  mineral  resources  are  contained  within  a  Whittle  shell,  while 
all  underground  mineral  resources  are  contained  within  optimized 
mining  shapes.  Excluding  the  impact  of  the  expected  change  in 
equity  interest  at  Porgera,  the  disposal  of  Lagunas  Norte,  and 
the  South  Arturo  asset  exchange  with  i-80  Gold,  Barrick’s  total 
attributable mineral resources grew in 2021 by an impressive 126%, 
net of depletion. This growth in total mineral resources stems from a 
combination of our increased confidence in our geological models as 
well as a more integrated approach to our mine planning, resulting 
in improved optimizations that ultimately support increased mineral 
resource conversion. In particular, this is reflected in both the open 
pit  and  underground  interface  studies  of  the  Gokona  deposit  at 
North Mara, and the extension of the Deep West zone at Bulyanhulu 
and  across  our  portfolio  at  Nevada  Gold  Mines.  This  integrated 
planning approach continues to gather momentum.

Growth in total attributable mineral resources for North America, 
net of depletion, was encouraging. At Carlin, optimized pit shells at 
both  Gold  Quarry  and  South Arturo  delivered  year-over-year  total 
open-pit  resource  growth  at  consistent  grades.  Notably  at  Gold 
Quarry,  the  mineral  resource  estimates  were  further  optimized 
based  on  process  routing  options  only  made  possible  with  the 
multiple  processing  facilities  available  following  the  formation  of 
NGM.  Within  Leeville  at  Carlin,  drilling  at  Turf  and  West  Leeville, 
along with improved mine designs, delivered total mineral resource 
growth,  net  of  depletion.  Drilling  at  the  Ren  and  North  Leeville 
underground  projects  delivered  maiden  additions  to  the  resource 
base, and are expected to be growth areas for Carlin into the future 
with  mineralization  open  in  all  directions.  At  Cortez,  total  mineral 
resource  growth  was  principally  driven  by  the  Robertson  open 
pit  and  to  a  lesser  extent,  updated  geological  modeling  and  mine 
design  improvements  at  Goldrush,  Crossroads  and  Cortez  Hills 
Underground. A portion of inferred resources were upgraded to the 
indicated category at Robertson which, together with year-over-year 
total mineral resource growth, supports our plan for the deposit to  
contribute meaningfully to Cortez’s production profile starting in 2025. 
Challenging  operating  environments  throughout  Latin America 
due  to  the  Covid-19  pandemic  impacted  drilling  activities  in  2021. 
However,  we  continued  our  focus  on  geological  and  metallurgical 
studies to grow our understanding of Veladero, Pascua-Lama and 
Alturas-Del Carmen over the course of the year.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 059

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Barrick’s resources are reported to a rounding standard of two 
significant digits, unchanged from 2020. As of December 31, 2021, 
Barrick’s  attributable  measured  and  indicated  resources  were  160 
million ounces12 at an average grade of 1.50 g/t Au. This compares 
to measured and indicated resources of 160 million ounces13 at an 
average  grade  of  1.52  g/t Au  in  2020. As  of  December  31,  2021, 
Barrick’s attributable inferred resources were 42 million ounces12 at 
an average grade of 1.3 g/t Au. This compares to inferred resources 
in 2020 of 43 million ounces13 at an average grade of 1.4 g/t Au.

Copper
Copper  mineral  reserves  for  2021  are  estimated  using  a  copper 
price  of  $2.75  per  pound  and  mineral  resources  are  estimated  at 
$3.50  per  pound,  both  unchanged  from  2020.  Copper  reserves 
and resources for 2021 are reported to a rounding standard of two 
significant digits, also unchanged from 2020. 

As  of  December  31,  2021,  attributable  proven  and  probable 
copper  mineral  reserves  were  12  billion  pounds12  at  an  average 
grade of 0.38%. This compares to 13 billion pounds13 at an average 
grade of 0.39% in the prior year. 

Attributable measured and indicated copper mineral resources 
were 24 billion pounds12 at an average grade of 0.35%, and inferred 
copper  mineral  resources  were  2.1  billion  pounds12  at  an  average 
grade  of  0.2%  as  of  December  31,  2021.  This  compares  to  prior 
year attributable measured and indicated copper mineral resources 
of  25  billion  pounds12  at  an  average  grade  of  0.36%,  and  inferred 
copper  mineral  resources  of  2.2  billion  pounds13  at  an  average 
grade of 0.2%.

2021  mineral  reserves  and  mineral  resources  are  estimated 
using  the  combined  value  of  gold,  copper  and  silver. Accordingly, 
mineral reserves and mineral resources are reported for all assets 
where  copper  or  silver  is  produced  and  sold  as  a  primary  product 
or a by-product.

ATTRIBUTABLE CONTAINED  
COPPER RESERVES12,13,a (Blb)

13

0.0

-0.64

12

0.18

10

0

2020

Acquisition/
Disposition

Depletion

Net
Conversion

2021

a. Figures rounded to two significant digits.

Key Business Developments
2021 Highlights
	Q Gold  and  copper  production  achieves  guidance  for  third 
consecutive  year  with  the  Africa  &  Middle  East  and  Latin 
America & Asia Pacific regions at the top end of guidance;
	Q Record $1.4 billion in total cash returns paid to shareholders in 
2021, inclusive of a $750 million return of capital distribution;
	Q Announcement  of  performance  dividend  policy  and  share 
buyback program for up to $1.0 billion starting in 2022, further 
demonstrates  our  strong  commitment  to  return  surplus  funds  
to shareholders;

060

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

	Q Disciplined  operational  execution 

in  achieving  production 
guidance  highlights  benefit  and  flexibility  of  six  Tier  One  Gold 
Assets1, notwithstanding a mechanical mill failure at Carlin;
	Q Our  decentralized  and  agile  management  structure  mitigated 
the flow-through challenges created by the Covid-19 pandemic 
such as supply chain pressures and tighter labor markets;
	Q Kibali paid a total of $200 million in dividends over the course of 
the second half of 2021, providing a mechanism for repatriation 
of cash from the Democratic Republic of Congo;

	Q Further  optimization  and  simplification  of  the  North  America 
portfolio  with  the  successful  asset  exchange  of  Lone  Tree  to 
i-80  Gold  Corp.  for  the  remaining  40%  of  South  Arturo  that 
Nevada Gold Mines did not already own

	Q Successfully  completed  the  sale  of  Lagunas  Norte  as  well  as 
the  sale  or  option  of  seven  legacy  closure  properties  over  the 
past 18 months, in line with our strategy of divesting non-core 
assets and portfolio optimization

	Q Achieved  zero  debt,  net  of  cash  at  the  end  of  2021  for  the 
second  straight  year-end,  notwithstanding  record  cash  returns 
to shareholders during the year of $1.4 billion

	Q Further  ounces  added  to  our  10-year  production  outlook, 
highlighting  the  quality  of  our  portfolio  and  ability  to  generate 
strong cash flow well into the future;

	Q Attributable  gold  reserves  replaced  150%  of  depletion,  before 
acquisition  and  equity  changes  related  to  South  Arturo  and 
Porgera, at a higher grade;

	Q Future  reserve  replacement  and  10-year  production  outlook 
reinforced by a robust pipeline of advanced exploration targets;
	Q Generative  work  drives  a  newly  invigorated  exploration  team 

into under-explored and prospective new frontiers;

	Q Reinforced  our  industry-leading  approach  to  ESG  by  further 
enhancement  to  our  Sustainability  Scorecard,  designed  to 
ensure  transparent  reporting  that  aligns  key  performance 
indicators against strategic priorities; and

	Q Completed  the  implementation  of  SAP  at  our  operations 
throughout  the  Americas  and  Africa,  which  has  allowed  us  to 
significantly simplify our systems landscape by decommissioning 
several legacy Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms.

Covid-19 Pandemic
Barrick  continues  to  work  closely  with  our  local  communities  on 
managing the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on our people and 
business.  Barrick  has  a  strong  culture  of  caring  for  the  welfare  of 
its  employees  and  communities.  Our  well-established  prevention 
practices and procedures, as well as the experience we gained in 
past years from managing two Ebola outbreaks around our African 
operations,  has  assisted  us  with  managing  this  unprecedented 
challenge. We continue to work actively in supporting government 
responses 
including  vaccination 
programs,  financial  assistance  as  well  as  using  our  supply  chain 
to secure key supplies for the benefit of the communities in which 
we operate. 

the  Covid-19  pandemic 

to 

Our preference for employing local nationals where we operate 
rather  than  expatriates,  means  that  we  are  not  dependent  upon  a 
workforce  traveling  to  site  on  a  regular  basis  from  other  parts  of 
the  globe.  We  continue  to  enforce  certain  operating  procedures 
to  respond  to  Covid-19,  and  to  date,  our  operations  have  not 
been  significantly  impacted  by  the  pandemic  with  the  exception 
of  Veladero,  where  the  commissioning  of  the  Phase  6  leach  pad 
was  delayed  to  the  second  quarter  of  2021  following  movement 
restrictions  implemented  by  the  government  of  Argentina  during 
the construction phase. Hemlo also experienced a slower ramp-up 
of  underground  development  in  2021  due  to  Covid-19  movement 
restrictions which impacted production. 

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisOur ongoing vigilance around social distancing, screening and 
contact tracing has allowed our sites to continue to produce and sell 
their production as well as keep our people and local communities 
safe at the same time. These actions have minimized the impacts of 
the pandemic at our operations and facilitated the continued delivery 
of strong operating cash flow since the onset of the pandemic. 

We  believe  that  our  focus  on  strengthening  our  balance  sheet 
in  recent  years  has  given  us  the  financial  flexibility  to  endure  any 
short-term  impacts  to  our  operations,  affording  us  the  opportunity 
to  participate  in  our  industry’s  inevitable  consolidation.  We  have 
$5.3  billion  in  cash,  an  undrawn  $3.0  billion  credit  facility  and 
no  significant  debt  repayments  due  until  2033,  providing  us  with 
sufficient liquidity to execute on our strategic goals. 

Although 

the  global 

rollout  of  vaccination  programs 

is 
progressing,  we  recognize  the  situation  remains  dynamic.  We 
continue  to  monitor  developments  around  the  world  and  believe 
we  have  positioned  Barrick  as  best  we  can  to  weather  the  
storm  and  take  advantage  of  any  value  opportunities  should  they 
present themselves.

Performance Dividend Policy
At the February 15, 2022 meeting, the Board of Directors approved 
a  performance  dividend  policy  that  will  enhance  the  return  to 
shareholders  when  the  Company’s  liquidity  is  strong.  In  addition 
to  our  base  dividend,  the  amount  of  the  performance  dividend  on 
a quarterly basis will be based on the amount of cash, net of debt, 
on  our  consolidated  balance  sheet  at  the  end  of  each  quarter  as 
per the schedule below. This performance dividend calculation will 
commence  after  our  March  31,  2022  consolidated  balance  sheet, 
with a potential payment in the second quarter of the year.

Performance 
Dividend 
Level

Level I

Level II

Level III

Level IV

Threshold 
Level

Net cash  
<$0

Net cash 
>$0 and 
<$0.5B

Net cash 
>$0.5B  
and <$1B
Net cash 
>$1B

Quarterly 
Base 
Dividend

$0.10 
per share

$0.10 
per share

Quarterly 
Performance 
Dividend

Quarterly 
Total 
Dividend

$0.00 
per share

$0.05 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.15 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.20 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.15 
per share

$0.25 
per share

The  declaration  and  payment  of  dividends  is  at  the  discretion  of 
the Board of Directors, and will depend on the company’s financial 
results,  cash  requirements,  future  prospects,  the  number  of 
outstanding common shares, and other factors deemed relevant by 
the Board.

Share Buyback Program
At the February 15, 2022 meeting, the Board of Directors authorized 
a  share  buyback  program  for  the  repurchase  of  up  to  $1.0  billion 
of  the  Company’s  outstanding  common  shares  over  the  next  
12 months. 

The actual number of common shares that may be purchased, 
if  any,  and  the  timing  of  any  such  purchases,  will  be  determined 
by Barrick based on a number of factors, including the Company’s 
financial  performance,  the  availability  of  cash  flows,  and  the 
consideration  of  other  uses  of  cash,  including  capital  investment 
opportunities, returns to shareholders, and debt reduction.

The  repurchase  program  does  not  obligate  the  Company 
to  acquire  any  particular  number  of  common  shares,  and  the 
repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time 
at the Company’s discretion.

Return of Capital
At  the Annual  and  Special  Meeting  on  May  4,  2021,  shareholders 
approved a $750 million return of capital distribution. This distribution  
was derived from a portion of the proceeds from the divestiture of 
Kalgoorlie  Consolidated  Gold  Mines  in  November  2019  and  from 
other recent dispositions made by Barrick and its affiliates in line with  
our strategy of focusing on our core assets. The total return of capital  
distribution  was  effected  in  three  equal  tranches  of  $250  million.  
The  first  tranche  was  paid  on  June  15,  2021,  to  shareholders  of 
record  at  the  close  of  business  on  May  28,  2021.  The  second 
tranche was paid on September 15, 2021, to shareholders of record 
at the close of business on August 31, 2021. The third tranche was 
paid on December 15, 2021, to shareholders of record at the close 
of business on November 30, 2021.

This  return  of  capital  distribution  demonstrated  Barrick’s 
commitment to return surplus funds to shareholders as outlined in the 
strategy stated at the time of the Randgold merger announcement 
in September 2018. Since that time, the quarterly dividend has more 
than  tripled  and  together  with  this  capital  distribution,  established 
one of the industry’s leading returns for shareholders in 2021.

Sale of Lagunas Norte
On  February  16,  2021,  Barrick  announced  it  had  entered  into  
an  agreement  to  sell  its  100%  interest  in  the  Lagunas  Norte  gold 
mine  in  Peru  to  Boroo  Pte  Ltd.  (“Boroo”)  for  total  consideration  
of  up  to  $81  million,  with  $20  million  of  cash  consideration  on 
closing,  additional  cash  consideration  of  $10  million  payable  on  
the  first  anniversary  of  closing  and  $20  million  payable  on  the 
second  anniversary  of  closing,  a  2%  net  smelter  return  royalty, 
which  may  be  purchased  by  Boroo  for  a  fixed  period  after  closing 
for $16 million, plus a contingent payment of up to $15 million based 
on  the  two-year  average  gold  price.  An  impairment  reversal  of  
$86 million was recognized in the first quarter of 2021. Refer to note 21  
of  the  Financial  Statements  for  further  details.  The  transaction 
closed  on  June  1,  2021  and  we  recognized  a  gain  on  sale  of  
$4 million in the second quarter of 2021, based on a final fair value 
of consideration of $65 million. We remain contractually liable for all 
tax matters that existed prior to our divestiture until these matters 
are resolved.

Acquisition of South Arturo Non-Controlling Interest
On  September  7,  2021,  Barrick  announced  it  had  entered  into  a 
definitive  asset  exchange  agreement  (the  “Exchange Agreement”) 
with  i-80  Gold  Corp.  (“i-80  Gold”)  to  acquire  the  40%  interest  in 
South  Arturo  that  NGM  did  not  already  own,  in  exchange  for  the 
Lone  Tree  and  Buffalo  Mountain  properties  and  infrastructure, 
which  were  in  care  and  maintenance  at  the  time.  The  exchange 
transaction closed on October 14, 2021. 

The  Exchange  Agreement  provides  for  payment  to  NGM  of 
contingent  consideration  of  up  to  $50  million  based  on  mineral 
resources  from  the  Lone  Tree  property.  In  connection  with  the 
asset  exchange,  NGM  also  entered  into  toll-milling  agreements 
providing  i-80  Gold  with  interim  processing  capacity  at  NGM’s 
autoclave facilities until the earlier of the three-year anniversary of 
the asset exchange and the date on which the Lone Tree facility is 
operational, and separately at NGM’s roaster facilities for a 10-year 
period,  which  was  assigned  a  fair  value  of  $nil.  In  addition,  each 
party  assumed  the  environmental  liabilities  and  closure  bonding 
for their acquired properties. In conjunction with the closing of the 
transaction, on October 14, 2021, NGM subscribed for $48 million 
in common shares of i-80 Gold.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 061

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisWe assigned a fair value of $175 million to the transaction and 
recognized  a  gain  of  $205  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  in 
relation  to  the  disposition  of  Lone  Tree.  Lone  Tree  was  in  a  net 
liability  position,  which  resulted  in  a  gain  that  exceeded  the  fair 
value. In addition, we recognized a loss of $85 million in equity in 
the fourth quarter, representing our share of the difference between 
the carrying value of the South Arturo non-controlling interest and 
the fair value of the transaction.

Porgera Special Mining Lease Extension 
On  April  9,  2021,  BNL  signed  a  binding  Framework  Agreement 
with  the  Independent  State  of  Papua  New  Guinea  (“PNG”)  and 
Kumul  Minerals  Holdings  Limited  (“Kumul  Minerals”),  a  state-
owned  mining  company,  setting  out  the  terms  and  conditions 
for  the  reopening  of  the  Porgera  mine.  On  February  3,  2022, 
the  Framework  Agreement  was  replaced  by  the  more  detailed 
Porgera Project Commencement Agreement (the “Commencement 
Agreement”). The Commencement Agreement was signed by PNG, 
Kumul  Minerals,  BNL  and  its  affiliate  Porgera  (Jersey)  Limited  on 
October  15,  2021,  and  it  became  effective  on  February  3,  2022, 
following  signature  by  Mineral  Resources  Enga  Limited  (“MRE”), 
the holder of the remaining 5% of the original Porgera joint venture. 
The  Commencement  Agreement  reflects  the  commercial  terms 
previously agreed to under the Framework Agreement, namely that 
PNG  stakeholders  will  receive  a  51%  equity  stake  in  the  Porgera 
mine, with the remaining 49% to be held by BNL or an affiliate. BNL 
is jointly owned on a 50/50 basis by Barrick and Zijin Mining Group. 
Accordingly,  following  the  implementation  of  the  Commencement 
Agreement, Barrick’s current 47.5% interest in the Porgera mine is 
expected to be reduced to a 24.5% interest as reflected in Barrick’s 
reserve  and  resource  estimates  for  Porgera.  BNL  will  retain 
operatorship  of  the  mine.  The  Commencement  Agreement  also 
provides that PNG stakeholders and BNL and its affiliates will share 
the economic benefits derived from the reopened Porgera Mine on 
a 53% and 47% basis over the remaining life of mine, respectively, 
and  that  the  Government  of  PNG  will  retain  the  option  to  acquire 
BNL’s or its affiliate’s 49% equity participation at fair market value 
after 10 years.

The  provisions  of  the  Commencement  Agreement  will  be 
implemented,  and  work  to  recommence  full  mine  operations  at 
Porgera will begin, following the execution of a number of definitive 
agreements  and  satisfaction  of  a  number  of  conditions.  These 
include  a  Shareholders  Agreement  among  the  shareholders  of  a 
new  Porgera  joint  venture  company,  an  Operatorship  Agreement 
pursuant  to  which  BNL  will  operate  the  Porgera  mine,  as  well  as 
a  Mine  Development  Contract  to  accompany  the  new  Special 
Mining Lease (“SML”) that the new Porgera joint venture company 
will  apply  for  following  its  incorporation.  Under  the  terms  of  the 
Commencement Agreement,  BNL  will  remain  in  possession  of  the 
site and maintain the mine on care and maintenance.

Porgera  was  excluded  from  our  2021  guidance  and  will 
also  be  excluded  from  our  2022  guidance.  We  expect  to  update 
our  guidance  following  both  the  execution  of  all  of  the  definitive 
agreements  to  implement  the  binding  Commencement Agreement 
and  the  finalization  of  a  timeline  for  the  resumption  of  full  mine 
operations.  Refer  to  notes  21  and  35  to  the  Financial  Statements 
for more information.

Global Exploration Executive Changes 
On  November  1,  2021,  after  33  years  of  distinguished  service, 
Rob  Krcmarov  transitioned  from  his  position  as  Executive  Vice-
President, Exploration to a new role as technical advisor to Barrick. 
During  his  career  with  the  Company,  Mr.  Krcmarov  has  led  teams 
that have discovered and delineated multiple ore bodies for Barrick, 
including the world-class Goldrush deposit. 

On November 3, 2021, Joel Holliday was appointed to the role 
of  Executive  Vice-President,  Exploration,  assuming  leadership 
of  Barrick’s  global  exploration  team.  Mr.  Holliday  has  served  as 
Barrick’s  Senior  Vice-President  for  Global  Exploration  since  the 
merger with Randgold Resources. Prior to the merger, Mr. Holliday 
served as Randgold’s Group Executive Exploration.

North America Regional Management Changes
Catherine  Raw,  Chief  Operating  Officer,  North  America,  decided  
to  return 
the  United  Kingdom  and  departed  Barrick  on  
December 31, 2021. 

to 

On January 6, 2022, Barrick announced that Christine Keener 
will  be  appointed  Chief  Operating  Officer  of  the  North  America 
region  commencing  in  February  2022.  Ms.  Keener  has  extensive 
experience in finance, strategy, commercial and operational roles. 
Prior to joining Barrick, Ms. Keener was Vice-President Operations, 
Europe and North America of Alcoa Corporation.

062

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisOutlook for 2022 

Operating Division Guidance
Our  2021  actual  gold  and  copper  production,  cost  of  sales,  total  cash  costs6,  all-in  sustaining  costs6  and  2022  forecast  gold  and  copper 
production, cost of sales, total cash costs6 and all-in sustaining costs6 ranges by operating division are as follows: 

Operating Division

Gold
  Carlin (61.5%)c
  Cortez (61.5%)d
  Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)

  Phoenix (61.5%)

  Long Canyon (61.5%)

Nevada Gold Mines (61.5%)

Hemlo
North America
  Pueblo Viejo (60%)

  Veladero (50%)
  Porgera (47.5%)e
Latin America & Asia Pacific

  Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)

  Kibali (45%)

  North Mara (84%)

  Bulyanhulu (84%)

  Tongon (89.7%)
Africa & Middle Eastf
Total Attributable to Barrickg,h,i

2021 
attributable 
production 
(000s ozs)

2021 
cost of
salesa
($/oz)

2021 
total
cash
costsb
($/oz)

2021 
all-in
sustaining
costsb
($/oz)

2022 
forecast 
attributable 
production 
(000s ozs)

2022 
forecast
cost
of salesa
($/oz)

2022 
forecast
total
cash costsb
($/oz)

2022 
forecast
all-in 
sustaining
costsb ($/oz)

923

509

334

109

161

2,036

150
2,186
488

172

–

660

560

366

260

178

187

1,591

4,437

968

1,122

1,122

1,922

739

1,072

1,693
1,115
896

1,256

–

1,028

1,049

1,016

966

1,079

1,504

1,092

1,093

782

763

749

398

188

705

1,388
752
541

816

–

622

650

627

777

709

1,093

740

725

1,087

1,013

892

533

238

949

1,970
1,020
745

1,493

–

969

970

818

1,001

891

1,208

950 – 1,030

900 – 980

730 – 790

1,020 – 1,100

480 – 530

970 – 1,050

650 – 710

1,010 – 1,090

330 – 370 1,110 – 1,190

770 – 830

930 – 1,010

90 – 120 2,000 – 2,080

40 – 50 1,420 – 1,500

720 – 780

540 – 600

890 – 970

540 – 620

1,900 – 2,100 1,020 – 1,100

710 – 770

990 – 1,070

160 – 180 1,340 – 1,420 1,140 – 1,200
740 – 800
670 – 730

2,100 – 2,300 1,050 – 1,130
400 – 440 1,070 – 1,150

1,510 – 1,590
1,040 – 1,120
910 – 990

220 – 240 1,210 – 1,290

740 – 800

1,270 – 1,350

–

–

–

–

620 – 680 1,140 – 1,220

700 – 760

1,040 – 1,120

510 – 560 1,070 – 1,150

680 – 740

940 – 1,020

340 – 380

990 – 1,070

600 – 660

800 – 880

230 – 260

820 – 900

670 – 730

930 – 1,010

180 – 210

950 – 1,030

630 – 690

850 – 930

170 – 200 1,700 – 1,780 1,220 – 1,280

1,400 – 1,480

968

1,450 – 1,600 1,070 – 1,150

720 – 780

950 – 1,030

1,026

4,200 – 4,600 1,070 – 1,150

730 – 790

1,040 – 1,120

2021 
attributable 
production 
(M lbs)

2021
cost of
salesa
($/lb)

2021
C1 cash
costsb
($/lb)

2021
all-in
sustaining
costsb
($/lb)

2022
forecast 
attributable 
production
(M lbs)

2022
forecast
cost
of salesa
($/lb)

2022
forecast C1
cash costsb
($/lb)

2022
forecast
all-in 
sustaining 
costsb ($/lb)

242

97

76
415

2.25

3.19

1.38
2.32

1.62

2.38

1.18
1.72

2.80

2.94

1.33
2.62

250 – 280

2.20 – 2.50

1.60 – 1.80

3.10 – 3.40

100 – 120

2.70 – 3.00

2.00 – 2.20

2.50 – 2.80

70 – 80
420 – 470

1.40 – 1.70
2.20 – 2.50

1.30 – 1.50
1.70 – 1.90

1.30 – 1.60
2.70 – 3.00

Copper

  Lumwana

  Zaldívar (50%)

  Jabal Sayid (50%)
Total Copperh

a.   Gold  cost  of  sales  per  ounce  is  calculated  as  cost  of  sales  across  our  gold  operations  (excluding  sites  in  closure  or  care  and  maintenance)  divided  by 
ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper 
operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). 

b.   Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.   Includes our share of South Arturo. On September 7, 2021, NGM announced it had entered into an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire the 40% 
interest in South Arturo that NGM did not already own in exchange for the Lone Tree and Buffalo Mountain properties and infrastructure. Operating results 
within our 61.5% interest in Carlin includes NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo up until May 30, 2021, and 100% interest thereafter, reflecting the terms of 
the exchange transaction which closed on October 14, 2021. Please refer to page 61 for more details. 

d.  Includes Goldrush.
e.   Porgera was placed on temporary care and maintenance in April 2020 and remains excluded from our 2022 guidance. We expect to update our guidance to 
include Porgera following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement the Commencement Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the 
resumption of full mine operations. Refer to page 94 for further details. 
f.  2021 results include Buzwagi until the end of the third quarter of 2021. 
g.  Total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce include costs allocated to non-operating sites.
h.   Operating division guidance ranges reflect expectations at each individual operating division, and may not add up to the company-wide guidance range total. 
The company-wide 2021 results and 2022 guidance ranges exclude Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight, and include Buzwagi until the end of the third 
quarter of 2021. Some of these assets are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance. Lagunas Norte was divested in June 2021. 

i.  Includes corporate administration costs. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 063

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisOperating Division, Consolidated Expense and Capital Guidance
Our  2021  actual  gold  and  copper  production,  cost  of  sales,  total  cash  costs6,  all-in  sustaining  costs6,  consolidated  expenses  and  capital 
expenditures and 2022 forecast gold and copper production, cost of sales, total cash costs6, all-in sustaining costs6, consolidated expenses 
and capital expenditures are as follows:

($ millions, except per ounce/pound data)

2021 Guidancea

2021 Actual

2022 Guidancea

Gold production

  Production (millions of ounces)

Gold cost metrics

  Cost of sales – gold ($ per oz)
   Total cash costs ($ per oz)b
  Depreciation ($ per oz)
   All-in sustaining costs ($ per oz)b
Copper production

  Production (millions of pounds)

Copper cost metrics

  Cost of sales – copper ($ per lb)
  C1 cash costs ($ per lb)b
  Depreciation ($ per lb)
  All-in sustaining costs ($ per lb)b
Exploration and project expenses

  Exploration and evaluation

  Project expenses

General and administrative expenses

  Corporate administration 
  Stock-based compensationc
Other expense (income)

Finance costs, net
Attributable capital expendituresd
  Attributable minesite sustainingb,d
  Attributable projectb,d
Total attributable capital expendituresd

4.40 – 4.70

1,020 – 1,070

680 – 730

300 – 330

970 – 1,020

410 – 460

1.90 – 2.10

1.40 – 1.60

0.60 – 0.70

2.00 – 2.20

280 – 320

230 – 250

50 – 70

~190

~130

~60

80 – 100

330 – 370

4,437

1,093

725

326

1,026

415

2.32

1.72

0.70

2.62

287

186

101

151

118

33

(67)

355

4.20 – 4.60

1,070 – 1,150

730 – 790

300 – 330

1,040 – 1,120

420 – 470

2.20 – 2.50

1.70 – 1.90

0.70 – 0.80

2.70 – 3.00

310 – 350

180 – 200

130 – 150

~180

~130

~50

50 – 70

330 – 370

1,250 – 1,450

550 – 650

1,800 – 2,100

1,364

587

1,951

1,350 – 1,550

550 – 650

1,900 – 2,200

a.   Based on the communication we received from the Government of Papua New Guinea that the SML will not be extended, Porgera was placed on temporary 
care and maintenance on April 25, 2020. Due to the uncertainty related to the timing and scope of future developments on the mine’s operating outlook, our 
2021 and 2022 guidance excludes Porgera. We expect to update our guidance to include Porgera following both the execution of definitive agreements to 
implement the Commencement Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations. Refer to page 94 for further details. 

b.   Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.   2021  actual  results  are  based  on  a  US$19.00  share  price  and  2022  guidance  is  based  on  a  one-month  trailing  average  ending  December  31,  2021  of 

US$19.23 per share.

d.   Attributable capital expenditures are presented on the same basis as guidance, which includes our 61.5% share of Nevada Gold Mines, our 60% share of 
Pueblo Viejo, our 80% share of Loulo-Gounkoto, our 89.7% share of Tongon, our 84% share of North Mara and Bulyanhulu and our 50% share of Zaldívar 
and Jabal Sayid. 

064

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis2022 Guidance Analysis
Estimates of future production, cost of sales per ounce7, total cash 
costs per ounce6 and all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 presented 
in  this  MD&A  are  based  on  mine  plans  that  reflect  the  expected 
method  by  which  we  will  mine  reserves  at  each  site.  Actual  gold 
and  copper  production  and  associated  costs  may  vary  from  these 
estimates  due  to  a  number  of  operational  and  non-operational 
risk  factors  (see  the  “Cautionary  Statement  on  Forward-Looking 
Information”  on  page  49  of  this  MD&A  for  a  description  of  certain 
risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from 
these estimates). 

Gold Production
We  expect  2022  gold  production  to  be  in  the  range  of  4.2  to  
4.6 million ounces, anchored by stable year-over-year performance 
across  our  portfolio  of  six  Tier  One  Gold Assets1,  highlighting  the 
importance  of  a  world-class  asset  base  in  delivering  consistent 
performance. 

Our 2022 gold production guidance currently excludes Porgera. 
We expect to update our guidance following both the execution of 
all  of  the  definitive  agreements  to  implement  the  Commencement 
Agreement  and  the  finalization  of  a  timeline  for  the  resumption  of 
full mine operations. Refer to page 94 for more information.

This  is  due  to  the  uncertainty  related  to  the  timing  and  scope 
of future operations at Porgera following the decision to place the 
mine  on  temporary  care  and  maintenance  on  April  25,  2020  to 
ensure the safety and security of our employees and communities. 
As this matter continues to evolve, we will provide further updates 
in  due  course.  We  remain  in  constructive  discussions  with  the 
Government of PNG and are optimistic about finding a solution to 
allow operations at Porgera to resume in 2022. 

Outside of our Tier One Gold Assets1, we expect the following 
significant  changes  in  year-over-year  production.  As  previously 
disclosed,  mining  will  cease  at  Long  Canyon  towards  the  middle 
of  2022,  with  residual  leaching  to  commence  thereafter.  The 
focus at Long Canyon is now shifting to permitting Phase 2, which 
is  expected  to  begin  production  in  2026.  This  is  partially  offset 
by  Veladero,  where  we  expect  stronger  performance  in  2022 
following  the  commissioning  of  Phase  6  in  the  second  quarter  of 
2021.  Furthermore,  we  expect  higher  production  at  Bulyanhulu  in 
2022  following  the  successful  ramp-up  of  underground  operations 
achieved at the end of 2021.
the 

the  Company’s  gold 
production  is  expected  to  be  the  lowest  in  the  first  quarter  mainly 
due to planned maintenance at Pueblo Viejo, Kibali and North Mara, 
as well as mine sequencing at Phoenix and Tongon. We expect the 
fourth  quarter  to  be  the  strongest  quarter  for  gold  production  as 
we continue to expect Goldrush to ramp up towards the end of the 
year, based on the issuance of a Record of Decision (“ROD”) in the 
second  half  of  2022,  as  well  as  higher  grades  from  Phoenix  and 
Tongon, and improved underground productivity at Hemlo. 

four  quarters  of  2022, 

Across 

Gold Cost of Sales per Ounce7
On  a  per  ounce  basis,  cost  of  sales  applicable  to  gold7,  after 
removing the portion related to non-controlling interests, is expected 
to be in the range of $1,070 to $1,150 per ounce in 2022, compared 
to the 2021 actual result of $1,093 per ounce.

The  expected  increase  compared  to  the  2021  guidance  range 
reflects changes in the expected sales mix with a higher contribution 
from Carlin and Veladero offset by a lower contribution from Pueblo 
Viejo and Long Canyon as described further in the Gold Total Cash 
Costs per Ounce6 section immediately below. 

Gold Total Cash Costs per Ounce 6
Total cash costs per ounce6 in 2022 is expected to be in the range 
of $730 to $790 per ounce, compared to the 2021 actual result of 
$725 per ounce. 

The  expected  increase  compared  to  the  2021  actual  result 
partially  reflects  the  full  year  impact  of  the  new  Mining  Education 
Tax  applied  to  gross  proceeds  in  Nevada  and  changes  in  the 
expected sales mix as well as underlying cost inflation, particularly 
energy costs. The Nevada Mining Education Tax became effective 
on July 1, 2021.

In  North America,  our  2022  guidance  for  total  cash  costs  per 
ounce6 for Nevada Gold Mines of $710 to $770 per ounce compares 
to  the  2021  actual  result  of  $705  per  ounce.  The  new  Mining 
Education Tax in Nevada is estimated to have a full year impact of 
approximately $17 per ounce for Nevada Gold Mines based on our 
$1,700 per ounce gold price assumption for 2022. Separately, the 
reduction  in  the  contribution  from  Long  Canyon  offset  by  a  higher 
contribution from Carlin, which has a comparatively higher cost on 
a per ounce basis, is expected to result in relatively higher costs for 
Nevada Gold Mines.

In  Latin  America  &  Asia  Pacific,  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6 
at  Pueblo  Viejo  are  expected  to  be  higher  in  2022  due  to  lower 
grades compared to the prior year. This is in line with the mine and 
stockpile  processing  plan  at  Pueblo  Viejo,  as  we  near  completion 
of  the  plant  expansion  project  to  offset  the  expected  decline  in 
grade. At  Veladero,  which  is  higher  cost  relative  to  Pueblo  Viejo, 
the expected higher production and sales volumes will also drive an 
increase in total cash costs per ounce6 at the regional level due to 
the change in sales mix. 

For Africa  & Middle East, the expected change in sales mix is 
having a positive impact reflecting the closure of Buzwagi, partially 
offset by a higher contribution from Bulyanhulu as the underground 
operation  was  ramping  up  through  the  course  of  2021. Total  cash 
costs  per  ounce6  at  Kibali  in  2022  are  expected  to  be  consistent 
with  the  prior  year,  while  expected  to  slightly  increase  at  Loulo-
Gounkoto.  As  previously  disclosed,  we  have  extended  the  life  of 
mine  at  Tongon  with  the  prospect  of  further  extensions  from  our 
exploration  programs,  resulting  in  higher  total  cash  costs  per 
ounce6 due to higher mining costs associated with the satellite pits.

Gold All-In Sustaining Costs per Ounce 6
All-in sustaining costs per ounce6 in 2022 is expected to be in the 
range of $1,040 to $1,120 per ounce, compared to the 2021 actual 
result  of  $1,026  per  ounce.  This  is  based  on  the  expectation  that 
minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures  on  a  per  ounce  basis 
will  be  higher  (refer  to  Capital  Expenditure  commentary  below  for 
further detail) and slightly higher total cash costs per ounce6.

The  expected  increase  compared  to  the  2021  guidance  range 
also  reflects  the  enactment  of  the  new  Mining  Education  Tax  in 
Nevada (effective from July 1, 2021), which was not included in our 
2021 guidance, together with the same underlying drivers described 
in the Gold Total Cash Costs per Ounce6 section above.

Copper Production and Costs
We  expect  2022  copper  production  to  be  in  the  range  of  420  to  
470  million  pounds,  compared  to  actual  production  of  415  million 
pounds in 2021. Production in the second half of 2022 is expected 
to  be  stronger  than  the  first  half,  due  to  steadily  increasing 
throughput at Lumwana. In addition, major maintenance at Zaldívar 
is scheduled in the first and third quarters of 2022. 

In 2022, cost of sales applicable to copper7 is expected to be in 
the range of $2.20 to $2.50 per pound, in line with the actual result of 
$2.32 per pound for 2021. The expected increase compared to the 
2021 guidance range reflects cost inflation and the impact of higher 
royalty  expenses  due  to  our  copper  price  assumption  increasing 
to $4.00 per pound (from $2.75 per pound in 2021). C1 cash costs 
per pound6 guidance of $1.70 to $1.90 per pound for 2022 is also 
in line with the 2021 actual result of $1.72 per pound. Copper all-in 
sustaining  costs  per  pound6  guidance  of  $2.70  to  $3.00  for  2022 
compares  to  the  actual  result  of  $2.62  in  2021  and  is  based  on 
the  expectation  that  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures  on 
a  per  pound  basis  will  be  higher  (refer  to  Capital  Expenditures 
commentary below for further detail).

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 065

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisExploration and Project Expenses
We expect to incur approximately $310 to $350 million of exploration 
and project expenses in 2022. This is an increase compared to our 
2021 guidance range of $280 to $320 million and is higher than the 
2021 actual result of $287 million.

Within  this  range,  we  expect  our  exploration  and  evaluation 
expenditures in 2022 to be approximately $180 to $200 million. This 
is  consistent  with  the  2021  actual  result  of  $186  million  and  will 
continue to support our resource and reserve conversion over the 
coming years.

We also expect to incur approximately $130 to $150 million of 
project expenses in 2022, compared to $101 million in 2021. Project 
expenses  are  mainly  related  to  the  ongoing  site  costs  at  Pascua-
Lama  as  well  as  project  evaluation  costs  across  our  portfolio, 
particularly in the Latin America & Asia Pacific region. 

General and Administrative Expenses
to  be 
In  2022,  we  expect  corporate  administration  costs 
approximately  $130  million  which 
from  our 
2021  guidance.  This  compares  to  the  actual  result  for  2021  of  
$118 million as we expect travel and office-related costs to return to 
pre-pandemic levels in 2022. 

is  unchanged 

Separately,  stock-based  compensation  expense  in  2022  is 
expected  to  be  approximately  $50  million  based  on  a  share  price 
assumption of $19.23.

Finance Costs, Net
In  2022,  net  finance  costs  of  $330  to  $370  million  primarily 
represents  interest  expense  on  long-term  debt,  non-cash  interest 
expense  relating  to  the  gold  and  silver  streaming  agreements  at 
Pueblo Viejo, and accretion, net of finance income. This guidance 
for 2022 is consistent with the actual result for 2021 of $355 million.

Capital Expenditures
Total  attributable  gold  and  copper  capital  expenditure  for  2022 
is  expected  to  be  in  the  range  of  $1,900  to  $2,200  million.  This 
compares to the actual spend for the 2021 year of $1,951 million. 
We continue to focus on the delivery of our project capital pipeline 
and  expect  attributable  project  capital  expenditures6  to  be  in  the 
range  of  $550  to  $650  million  in  2022,  at  around  the  same  level 
as  our  actual  expenditures  of  $587  million  in  2021.  This  reflects 
the ongoing construction activities for the plant expansion and mine 
life  extension  project  at  Pueblo  Viejo  and  to  a  lesser  extent,  our 
solar  power  initiatives  at  Loulo-Gounkoto  and  the  construction  of 
the  Phase  7A  leach  pad  expansion  at  Veladero.  The  remainder 
of  expected  project  capital  expenditures6  is  mainly  related  to 
underground development and infrastructure at Goldrush, the third 
shaft  project  at  Turquoise  Ridge,  open  pit  development  at  North 
Mara and optimization projects at Bulyanhulu.

Attributable  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditure6  for  2022 
is  expected  to  be  in  the  range  of  $1,350  to  $1,550  million,  which 
compares  to  the  actual  spend  for  2021  of  $1,364  million.  The 
guidance range for 2022 is split between our gold assets ($1,000 to 
$1,200 million) and copper assets ($340 to $360 million). Compared 
to  the  prior  year,  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures6  in  
2022  are  expected  to  increase  at  Lumwana  by  approximately 
$100  million,  mainly  related  to  higher  waste  stripping  to  allow  for 
future  production  growth  over  the  five-year  outlook.  At  NGM,  we 
are  also  expecting  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditure6  to  be 
approximately  $100  million  higher,  driven  by  Cortez  and  Carlin. 
At  Cortez,  this  is  due  to  higher  waste  stripping,  infrastructure 
and  equipment  related  to  Cortez  Pits  as  well  as  tailings  dam 
construction.  At  Carlin,  the  key  drivers  are  the  expansion  of  the 
Gold Quarry Roaster and conversion of the Goldstrike autoclave to 
a carbon-in-leach circuit. 

Effective Income Tax Rate
Based  on  a  gold  price  assumption  of  $1,700/oz,  our  expected 
effective tax rate range for 2022 is 27% to 32%. The rate is sensitive 
to the relative proportion of sales in high versus low tax jurisdictions, 
realized gold and copper prices, the proportion of income from our 
equity  accounted  investments  and  the  level  of  non-tax  affected 
costs in countries where we generate net losses.

OUTLOOK ASSUMPTIONS AND ECONOMIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Gold price sensitivity 

Copper price sensitivity

2022 Guidance 
Assumption

Hypothetical 
Change

Impact on
EBITDAa
(millions)

$ 1,700/oz  

+/-  $  100/oz  

+/-  $  580  

Impact on TCC
and AISCa
5/oz

+/-  $ 

$  4.00/lb  

+/-  $  0.25/lb  

+/-  $  60  

+/-  $  0.01/lb

a.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.

066

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
Risks and Risk Management
Overview
The ability to deliver on our vision, strategic objectives and operating 
guidance  depends  on  our  ability  to  understand  and  appropriately 
respond to the uncertainties or “risks” we face that may prevent us 
from achieving our objectives. To achieve this, we:

	Q Maintain a framework that permits us to manage risk effectively 

and in a manner that creates the greatest value;

	Q Integrate  a  process  for  managing  risk  into  all  our  important 
decision-making  processes  so  that  we  reduce  the  effect  of 
uncertainty on achieving our objectives;

	Q Actively  monitor  key  controls  we  rely  on  to  achieve  the 
Company’s objectives so they remain in place and are effective 
at all times; and
	Q Provide  assurance 

relevant 
committees  of  the  Board  on  the  effectiveness  of  key  control 
activities.

to  senior  management  and 

Board and Committee Oversight
We  maintain  strong  risk  oversight  practices,  with  responsibilities 
outlined  in  the  mandates  of  the  Board  and  related  committees. 
The  Board’s  mandate  is  clear  on  its  responsibility  for  reviewing 
and  discussing  with  management  the  processes  used  to  assess 
and  manage  risk,  including  the  identification  by  management 
of  the  principal  risks  of  the  business,  and  the  implementation  of 
appropriate systems to deal with such risks.

The Audit & Risk Committee assists the Board in overseeing the 
Company’s management of principal risks and the implementation 
of policies and standards for monitoring and modifying such risks, as 
well as monitoring and reviewing the Company’s financial position 
and  financial  risk  management  programs. The  ESG  &  Nominating 
Committee assists the Board in overseeing the Company’s policies 
and performance for its environmental, health and safety, corporate 
social responsibility and human rights programs.

Management Oversight
Our  weekly  Executive  Committee  Review  is  the  main  forum  for 
senior management to raise and discuss risks facing the operations 
and organization more broadly. At regularly scheduled meetings, the 
Board and the Audit & Risk Committee are provided with updates on 
the key issues identified by management at these weekly sessions.

Principal Risks
The  following  subsections  describe  some  of  our  key  sources 
of  uncertainty  and  critical  risk  modification  activities.  The  risks 
described below are not the only ones facing Barrick. Our business 
is  subject  to  inherent  risks  in  financial,  regulatory,  strategic  and 
operational  areas.  For  a  more  comprehensive  discussion  of 
those  inherent  risks,  see  “Risk  Factors”  in  our  most  recent  Form  
40-F/Annual 
the  SEC  and  
Canadian  provincial  securities  regulatory  authorities. Also  see  the 
“Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information” on page 49  
of this MD&A.

Information  Form  on 

file  with 

impact 

liquidity 

Financial position and liquidity
Our liquidity profile, level of indebtedness and credit ratings are all  
factors in our ability to meet short- and long-term financial demands. 
through 
Barrick’s  outstanding  debt  balances 
scheduled  interest  and  principal  repayments  and  the  results  of 
leverage  ratio  calculations,  which  could  influence  our  investment 
grade credit ratings and ability to access capital markets. In addition, 
our  ability  to  draw  on  our  credit  facility  is  subject  to  meeting  its 
covenants.  Our  primary  source  of  liquidity  is  our  operating  cash 
flow, which is dependent on the ability of our operations to deliver 
projected future cash flows. The ability of our operations to deliver 
projected future cash flows, as well as future changes in gold and 
copper market prices, either favorable or unfavorable, will continue 
to have a material impact on our cash flow and liquidity.

Key risk modification activities:
	Q Continued  focus  on  generating  positive  free  cash  flow  by 
improving the underlying cost structures of our operations in a 
sustainable manner;

	Q Disciplined  capital  allocation  criteria  for  all  investments,  to 
ensure  a  high  degree  of  consistency  and  rigor  is  applied  to 
all  capital  allocation  decisions  based  on  a  comprehensive 
understanding of risk and reward;

	Q Preparation of budgets and forecasts to understand the impact 
of  different  price  scenarios  on  liquidity,  including  our  capacity  
to  provide  cash  returns 
formulate 
appropriate strategies; 

to  shareholders,  and 

	Q Review  of  debt  and  net  debt  levels  to  ensure  appropriate 
leverage  and  monitor  the  market  for  liability  management 
opportunities; and 

	Q Other  options  available  to  the  Company  to  enhance  liquidity 
include drawing on our $3.0 billion undrawn credit facility, asset 
sales, joint ventures, or the issuance of debt or equity securities.

Improving free cash flow6 and costs
Our ability to improve productivity, drive down operating costs and 
reduce  working  capital  remains  a  focus  in  2022  and  is  subject  to 
several sources of uncertainty. This includes our ability to achieve 
and maintain industry-leading margins by improving the productivity 
and efficiency of our operations. 

Key risk modification activities:
	Q Maximizing  the  benefit  of  higher  gold  prices  through  agile 

management and operational execution; 

	Q Weekly  Executive  Committee  Review  to  identify,  assess  and 

respond to risks in a timely manner;

	Q Enabling  simplification  and  agile  decision  making  through 

unification of business systems; and 

	Q A flat, operationally focused, agile management structure with a 

tenet in ownership culture.

Social license to operate
At  Barrick,  we  are  committed  to  building,  operating,  and  closing 
our  mines  in  a  safe  and  responsible  manner.  To  do  this,  we  seek 
to  build  trust-based  partnerships  with  host  governments  and  local 
communities  to  drive  shared  long-term  value  while  working  to 
minimize  the  social  and  environmental  impacts  of  our  activities. 
Geopolitical  risks  such  as  resource  nationalism  and  incidents  of 
corruption  are  inherent  in  the  business  of  a  company  operating 
globally.  Past  environmental  incidents  in  the  extractive  industry 
highlight  the  hazards  (e.g.,  water  management,  tailings  storage 
facilities, etc.) and the potential consequences to the environment, 
community  health  and  safety.  Our  ability  to  maintain  compliance 
with  regulatory  and  community  obligations  in  order  to  protect  the 
environment and our host communities alike remains one of our top 
priorities. Barrick also recognizes climate change as an area of risk 
requiring specific focus and that reducing emissions to counter the 
causes  of  climate  change  requires  strong  collective  action  by  the 
mining industry. 

 Key risk modification activities:
	Q Our commitment to responsible mining is supported by a robust 
governance  framework,  including  an  overarching  Sustainable 
Development  Policy  and  related  policies  in  the  areas  of 
Biodiversity,  Social  Performance,  Occupational  Health  and 
Safety, Environment and Human Rights;

	Q Implementation  of  a  Sustainability  Scorecard  to  track  our 
sustainability  performance  using  key  performance  indicators 
aligned to priority areas set out in our strategy; 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 067

Management’s Discussion and Analysis	Q Mandatory training on our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics 
as well as supporting policies which set out the ethical behavior 
expected of everyone working at, or with, Barrick;

	Q We  take  a  partnership  approach  with  our  host  governments. 
This means we work to balance our own interests and priorities 
with those of our government partners, working to ensure that 
everyone derives real value from our operations;

	Q Established  Community  Development  Committees  at  each  of 
our operational mines to identify community needs and priorities 
and to allocate funds to those initiatives most meaningful to the 
local community;

	Q We  open  our  social  and  environmental  performance  to  third-
party scrutiny, including through the ISO 14001 re-certification 
process,  International  Cyanide  Management  Code  audits,  and 
annual human rights impact assessments; 

Market Overview
The  market  prices  of  gold  and,  to  a  lesser  extent,  copper  are  the 
primary  drivers  of  our  profitability  and  our  ability  to  generate  free 
cash flow6 for our shareholders.

Gold
The  price  of  gold  is  subject  to  volatile  price  movements  over 
short  periods  of  time  and  is  affected  by  numerous  industry  and 
macroeconomic  factors.  During  2021,  the  gold  price  ranged  from 
$1,677 per ounce to $1,959 per ounce. The average market price 
for  the  year  of  $1,799  per  ounce  represented  an  all-time  annual 
high and an increase of 2% versus 2020.

AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT GOLD PRICES
(dollars per ounce)

2,000

1,500

1,000

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

During  the  year,  the  gold  price  remained  strong  as  a  result  of  the 
continued fiscal and monetary stimulus measures put in place due 
to  the  economic  uncertainty  caused  by  Covid-19,  negative  real 
interest  rates,  and  growing  inflation  concerns,  tempered  by  an 
increase in the trade-weighted value of the US dollar. 

Copper
During 2021, London Metal Exchange (“LME”) copper prices traded 
in  a  wide  range  of  $3.49  to  an  all-time  high  of  $4.87  per  pound, 
averaged an all-time annual high of $4.23 per pound, and closed the 
year at $4.40 per pound. Copper prices are significantly influenced 
by physical demand from emerging markets, especially China. 

After copper prices fell to four-year lows in March 2020 due to 
initial  concerns  and  near-term  economic  impacts  from  the  spread 
of  Covid-19,  they  subsequently  rose  over  the  next  12  months, 
reaching  all-time  highs  in  May  2021  due  to  a  recovery  in  demand 
from  China,  low  global  stockpile  levels,  and  the  expected  impact 
of global financial stimulus measures. Prices moderated thereafter, 
but remained robust through the remainder of 2021. 

	Q Our  climate  change  strategy  has 

identify, 
understand  and  mitigate  the  risks  associated  with  climate 
change;  measure  and  reduce  our  impacts  on  climate  change; 
and improve our disclosure on climate change;

three  pillars: 

	Q We  established  site-specific  emergency  response  plans  as 
well  as  regional  crisis  management  plans  to  manage  any 
manifestation of Covid-19 in or near our mines globally; and
	Q We continuously review and update our closure plans and cost 
estimates  to  plan  for  environmentally  responsible  closure  and 
monitoring of operations.

Resources and reserves and production outlook
Like  any  mining  company,  we  face  the  risk  that  we  are  unable 
to  discover  or  acquire  new  resources  or  that  we  do  not  convert 
resources into production. As we move into 2022 and beyond, our 
overriding  objective  of  growing  free  cash  flow6  continues  to  be 
underpinned by a strong pipeline of organic projects and minesite 
expansion opportunities in our core regions. Uncertainty related to 
these and other opportunities exists (potentially both favorable and 
unfavorable)  due  to  the  speculative  nature  of  mineral  exploration 
and  development  as  well  as  the  potential  for  increased  costs, 
delays,  suspensions  and  technical  challenges  associated  with  the 
construction of capital projects.

Key risk modification activities:
	Q Focus  on 

responsible  mineral 

resource  management, 
continuously improve ore body knowledge, and add to reserves 
and resources;

	Q Grow and invest in a portfolio of Tier One Gold Assets1, Tier Two 
Gold Assets2,  Tier  One  Copper Assets3  and  Strategic Assets4 
with  an  emphasis  on  organic  growth  to  leverage  our  existing 
footprint; and

	Q Invest in exploration across extensive land positions in many of 

the world’s most prolific gold districts.

068

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisAVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT COPPER PRICES
(dollars per pound)

AVERAGE MONTHLY SPOT CRUDE OIL PRICE (WTI)
(dollars per barrel)

5.00

4.50

4.00

3.50

3.00

2.50

2.00

80

60

40

20

0

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

During  2021,  we  did  not  have  any  fuel  hedge  positions,  and  are 
unhedged against fuel exposures as at December 31, 2021.

US Dollar Interest Rates
During March 2020, the US Federal Reserve lowered interest rates 
to a range of 0.00% to 0.25% as a result of the economic impacts 
of  the  spread  of  Covid-19  and  kept  rates  at  that  level  through  the 
remainder of 2020 and all of 2021. There are growing expectations 
for  increases  in  benchmark  rates  in  2022,  but  the  scale  of  any 
changes  to  monetary  policy  will  be  dependent  on  the  strength  of 
economic recovery and inflation levels. 

At  present,  our  interest  rate  exposure  mainly  relates  to 
interest  income  received  on  our  cash  balances  ($5.3  billion  at  
December  31,  2021);  the  mark-to-market  value  of  derivative 
instruments;  the  carrying  value  of  certain  long-lived  assets  and 
liabilities;  and  the  interest  payments  on  our  variable-rate  debt  
($0.1  billion  at  December  31,  2021).  Currently,  the  amount  of 
interest expense recorded in our consolidated statement of income 
is  not  materially  impacted  by  changes  in  interest  rates,  because 
the majority of debt was issued at fixed interest rates. The relative 
amounts of variable-rate financial assets and liabilities may change 
in  the  future,  depending  on  the  amount  of  operating  cash  flow  we 
generate, as well as the level of capital expenditures and our ability 
to  borrow  on  favorable  terms  using  fixed  rate  debt  instruments. 
Changes in interest rates affect the accretion expense recorded on 
our  provision  for  environmental  rehabilitation  and  therefore  would 
affect our net earnings.

We  have  provisionally  priced  copper  sales  for  which  final  price 
determination  versus  the  relevant  copper  index  is  outstanding  at 
the  balance  sheet  date.  As  at  December  31,  2021,  we  recorded  
45  million  pounds  of  copper  sales  still  subject  to  final  price 
settlement at an average provisional price of $4.34 per pound. The 
impact  to  net  income  before  taxation  of  a  10%  movement  in  the 
market price of copper would be approximately $20 million, holding 
all other variables constant.

Currency Exchange Rates
The  results  of  our  mining  operations  outside  of  the  United  States 
are  affected  by  US  dollar  exchange  rates.  We  have  exposure  to 
the Argentine  peso  through  operating  costs  at  our  Veladero  mine, 
and  peso  denominated  VAT  receivable  balances.  In  addition,  we 
have  exposure  to  the  Canadian  and  Australian  dollars,  Chilean 
peso,  Papua  New  Guinea  kina,  Peruvian  sol,  Zambian  kwacha, 
Tanzanian shilling, Dominican peso, West African CFA franc, Euro, 
South African rand, and British pound through mine operating and 
capital costs. 

Fluctuations  in  these  exchange  rates  increase  the  volatility 
of  our  costs  reported  in  US  dollars.  In  2021,  the Australian  dollar 
traded in a range of $0.70 to $0.80 against the US dollar, while the 
US  dollar  against  the  Canadian  dollar, Argentine  peso,  and  West 
African CFA franc ranged from $1.20 to $1.30, ARS 84 to ARS 103, 
and XOF 531 to XOF 586, respectively. Due to inflation pressures 
in  Argentina  and  government  actions,  there  was  a  continued 
weakening  of  the  Argentine  peso  during  the  year.  During  2021, 
we did not have any currency hedge positions, and are unhedged 
against  foreign  exchange  exposures  as  at  December  31,  2021 
beyond spot requirements.

Fuel
For  2021,  the  price  of  West  Texas  Intermediate  (“WTI”)  crude 
oil  traded  in  a  wide  range  between  $47  and  $85  per  barrel,  with  
an  average  market  price  of  $68  per  barrel,  and  closed  the  year  
at  $75  per  barrel.  Oil  prices  were  significantly  impacted  by  an 
increase  in  global  economic  activity  during  the  year  as  well  as 
constrained supply. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 069

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisPRODUCTION AND COST SUMMARY – GOLD

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Nevada Gold Mines (61.5%)a
  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
  Carlin (61.5%)c

  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

  Cortez (61.5%)d

  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

  Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)e
  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

  Phoenix (61.5%)f

  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

  Long Canyon (61.5%)f

  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

Pueblo Viejo (60%)
  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)
  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
Kibali (45%)
  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
Veladero (50%)
  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
Porgera (47.5%)g
  Gold produced (000s oz)
  Cost of sales ($/oz)
  Total cash costs ($/oz)b
  All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

604
1,023
687
893

295
899
728
950

169
984
657
853

82
1,194
819
996

25
2,047
443
614

33
999
325
384

107
987
612
858

126
1,139
685
822

94
979
582
776

61
1,279
834
1,113

–
–
–
–

495
1,123
734
975

209
1,017
814
1,124

130
1,164
800
1,065

82
1,169
788
943

31
1,777
499
582

43
796
201
251

127
895
521
728

137
1,109
708
1,056

95
987
597
751

48
1,315
882
1,571

–
–
–
–

22%
(9%)
(6%)
(8%)

41%
(12%)
(11%)
(15%)

30%
(15%)
(18%)
(20%)

0%
2%
4%
6%

(19%)
15%
(11%)
5%

(23%)
26%
62%
53%

(16%)
10%
17%
18%

(8%)
3%
(3%)
(22%)

(1%)
(1%)
(3%)
3%

27%
(3%)
(5%)
(29%)

–
–
–
–

2,036
1,072
705
949

923
968
782
1,087

509
1,122
763
1,013

334
1,122
749
892

109
1,922
398
533

161
739
188
238

488
896
541
745

560
1,049
650
970

366
1,016
627
818

172
1,256
816
1,493

–
–
–
–

2,131
1,029
702
941

1,024
976
790
1,041

491
958
678
998

330
1,064
711
798

126
1,772
649
814

160
869
236
405

542
819
504
660

544
1,060
666
1,006

364
1,091
608
778

226
1,151
748
1,308

86
1,225
928
1,115

(4%)
4%
0%
1%

(10%)
(1%)
(1%)
4%

4%
17%
13%
2%

1%
5%
5%
12%

(13%)
8%
(39%)
(35%)

1%
(15%)
(20%)
(41%)

(10%)
9%
7%
13%

3%
(1%)
(2%)
(4%)

1%
(7%)
3%
5%

(24%)
9%
9%
14%

(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)

2,218
924
634
828

968
1,004
746
984

801
762
515
651

335
846
585
732

56
2,093
947
1,282

58
1,088
333
681

590
747
471
592

572
1,044
634
886

366
1,111
568
693

274
1,188
734
1,105

284
994
838
1,003

070

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRODUCTION AND COST SUMMARY – GOLD (continued)

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Tongon (89.7%)

Gold produced (000s oz)
Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

Hemlo

Gold produced (000s oz)
Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

North Marah

Gold produced (000s oz)
Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

Buzwagih,i

Gold produced (000s oz)
Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

Bulyanhuluh

Gold produced (000s oz)
Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

Kalgoorlie (50%)j

Gold produced (000s oz)
Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
Total Attributable to Barrickk
Gold produced (000s oz)
Cost of sales ($/oz)l
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

50
1,494
1,205
1,301

35
1,770
1,481
1,938

69
858
679
1,033

57
956
567
897

41
1,579
1,139
1,329

26
1,870
1,493
2,276

66
993
796
985

4
1,000
967
970

53
1,073
724
827

22%
(5%)
6%
(2%)

35%
(5%)
(1%)
(15%)

5%
(14%)
(15%)
5%

8%
(11%)
(22%)
8%

187
1,504
1,093
1,208

150
1,693
1,388
1,970

260
966
777
1,001

40
1,334
1,284
1,291

178
1,079
709
891

255
1,334
747
791

223
1,256
1,056
1,423

261
992
702
929

84
1,021
859
871

44
1,499
832
895

(27%)
13%
46%
53%

(33%)
35%
31%
38%

0%
(3%)
11%
8%

(52%)
31%
49%
48%

304%
(28%)
(15%)
0%

1,203
1,075
715
971

1,092
1,122
739
1,034

10%
(4%)
(3%)
(6%)

4,437
1,093
725
1,026

4,760
1,056
699
967

(7%)
4%
4%
6%

245
1,469
787
844

213
1,137
904
1,140

251
953
646
802

83
1,240
1,156
1,178

27
1,207
676
773

206
1,062
873
1,183

5,465
1,005
671
894

a.   Represents the combined results of Cortez, Goldstrike (including our 60% share of South Arturo) and our 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge until June 30, 2019. Commencing 
July 1, 2019, the date Nevada Gold Mines was established, the results represent our 61.5% interest in Cortez, Carlin (including Goldstrike and NGM’s 60% interest in 
South Arturo up until May 30, 2021 and 100% interest thereafter), Turquoise Ridge (including Twin Creeks), Phoenix and Long Canyon. 
b.   Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.   On July 1, 2019, Barrick’s Goldstrike and Newmont’s Carlin were contributed to Nevada Gold Mines and are now referred to as Carlin. As a result, the amounts presented 
represent Goldstrike on a 100% basis (including our 60% share of South Arturo) up until June 30, 2019, and the combined results of Carlin and Goldstrike (including our 
share of South Arturo) on a 61.5% basis thereafter. On September 7, 2021, Barrick announced NGM had entered into an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire 
the  40%  interest  in  South Arturo  that  NGM  did  not  already  own  in  exchange  for  the  Lone Tree  and  Buffalo  Mountain  properties  and  infrastructure.  Operating  results 
within our 61.5% interest in Carlin includes NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo up until May 30, 2021, and 100% interest thereafter, reflecting the terms of the Exchange 
Agreement which closed on October 14, 2021. 

d.   On July 1, 2019, Cortez was contributed to Nevada Gold Mines, a joint venture with Newmont. As a result, the amounts presented are on a 100% basis up until June 30, 
2019, and on a 61.5% basis thereafter. Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez management. Comparative 
periods have been restated to include Goldrush. 

e.   Barrick owned 75% of Turquoise Ridge through to the end of the second quarter of 2019, with our joint venture partner, Newmont, owning the remaining 25%. Turquoise 
Ridge was proportionately consolidated on the basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities relating 
to the arrangement. The figures presented in this table are based on our 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge until June 30, 2019. On July 1, 2019, Barrick’s 75% interest in 
Turquoise Ridge and Newmont’s Twin Creeks and 25% interest in Turquoise Ridge were contributed to Nevada Gold Mines. Starting July 1, 2019, the results represent 
our 61.5% share of Turquoise Ridge and Twin Creeks, now referred to as Turquoise Ridge.

f.  A 61.5% interest in these sites was acquired as a result of the formation of Nevada Gold Mines on July 1, 2019.
g.  As Porgera was placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, no operating data or per ounce data has been provided starting the third quarter of 2020.  
h.   Formerly  part  of  Acacia  Mining  plc.  On  September  17,  2019,  Barrick  acquired  all  of  the  shares  of  Acacia  it  did  not  own.  Operating  results  are  included  at  63.9%  
until  September  30,  2019  (notwithstanding  the  completion  of  the  Acacia  transaction  on  September  17,  2019,  we  consolidated  our  interest  in  Acacia  and  recorded 
a  non-controlling  interest  of  36.1%  in  the  income  statement  for  the  entirety  of  the  third  quarter  of  2019  as  a  matter  of  convenience),  on  a  100%  basis  from  
October 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, and on an 84% basis thereafter as the GoT’s 16% free-carried interest was made effective from January 1, 2020. 
 With the end of mining at Buzwagi in the third quarter of 2021, as previously reported, we have ceased to include production or non-GAAP cost metrics for Buzwagi from 
October 1, 2021 onwards. 
 On November 28, 2019, we completed the sale of our 50% interest in Kalgoorlie in Western Australia to Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited for total cash consideration of 
$750 million. Accordingly, the amounts presented represent our 50% interest until November 28, 2019.

i. 

j. 

k.   Excludes Pierina, Golden Sunlight starting in the third quarter of 2019, Morila (40%) starting in the third quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in November 2020, Lagunas 
Norte starting in the fourth quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in June 1, 2021 and Buzwagi starting in the fourth quarter of 2021. Some of these assets are producing 
incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance. 
 Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both 
on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

l. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 071

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisPRODUCTION AND COST SUMMARY – COPPER 

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Lumwana

Copper production (millions lbs)

Cost of sales ($/lb)
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

Zaldívar (50%)

Copper production (millions lbs)

Cost of sales ($/lb)
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

Jabal Sayid (50%)

Copper production (millions lbs)

Cost of sales ($/lb)
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

Total Copper

Copper production (millions lbs)
Cost of sales ($/lb)b
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

78

2.16

1.54

3.29

27

3.14

2.35

3.42

21

1.36

1.11
1.27

126

2.21

1.63

2.92

57

2.54

1.76

2.68

24

3.13

2.33

2.77

19

1.51

1.35
1.55

100

2.57

1.85

2.60

37%

(15%)

(13%)

23%

13%

0%

1%

23%

11%

(10%)

(18%)
(18%)

26%

(14%)

(12%)

12%

242

2.25

1.62

2.80

97

3.19

2.38

2.94

76

1.38

1.18
1.33

415

2.32

1.72

2.62

276

2.01

1.56

2.43

106

2.46

1.79

2.25

75

1.42

1.11
1.24

457

2.02

1.54

2.23

(12%)

12%

4%

15%

(8%)

30%

33%

31%

1%

(3%)

6%
7%

(9%)

15%

12%

17%

238

2.13

1.79

3.04

128

2.46

1.77

2.15

66

1.53

1.26
1.51

432

2.14

1.69

2.52

a.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
b.   Copper  cost  of  sales  per  pound  is  calculated  as  cost  of  sales  across  our  copper  operations  divided  by  pounds  sold  (both  on  an  attributable  basis  using 

Barrick’s ownership share).

OPERATING PERFORMANCE

Review of Operating Performance
Our presentation of reportable operating segments consists of nine 
gold  mines  (Carlin,  Cortez, Turquoise  Ridge,  Pueblo  Viejo,  Loulo-
Gounkoto, Kibali, Veladero, North Mara and Bulyanhulu). Starting in 
the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush was included as part of Cortez as 
management began reviewing the operating results and assessing 
performance  on  a  combined  level.  The  remaining  operating 

segments, including our remaining gold mines, copper mines, and 
project,  have  been  grouped  into  an  “other”  category  and  will  not 
be  reported  on  individually.  Segment  performance  is  evaluated 
based on a number of measures including operating income before 
tax, production levels and unit production costs. Certain costs are 
managed on a consolidated basis and are therefore not reflected in 
segment income. 

072

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisNEVADA GOLD MINES (61.5% basis)a, NEVADA USA

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Total tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Underground

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Underground mined

Processed

45,593

8,763

35,468

1,362

0.65

9.86

1.90

48,494

11,553

35,616

1,325

0.69

9.28

1.50

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

12,194

14,697

Oxide mill

Roaster

Autoclave

Heap leach
Recovery rateb
Oxide Millb
Roaster

Autoclave

Gold produced (000s oz)

Oxide mill

Roaster

Autoclave

Heap leach

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)c
EBITDA margind
Capital expenditures ($ millions)e

Minesite sustainingc
Projectc

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)c
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)c
All-in costs ($/oz)c

3,054

1,386

1,203

6,551

80%

75%

86%

68%

604

113

308

102

81

611

1,128

625

617

793

70%

135

115

20

1,023

687
893

927

2,991

1,108

1,204

9,394

80%

79%

86%

69%

495

98

214

102

81

485

891

544

333

495

56%

133

104

29

1,123

734
975
1,035

(6%)

(24%)

0%

3%

(6%)

6%

27%

(17%)

2%

25%

0%

(30%)

0%

(5%)

0%

(1%)

22%

15%

44%

0%

0%

26%

27%

15%

85%

60%

27%

2%

11%

(31%)

(9%)

(6%)
(8%)
(10%)

198,725

37,670

155,724

5,331

223,148

36,305

181,675

5,168

0.84

9.32

1.78

49,232

12,334

4,866

4,683

27,349

79%

77%

86%

69%

2,036

364

960

410

302

2,039

3,773

2,186

1,675

2,305

61%

555

458

97

1.14

9.67

2.02

43,174

12,907

5,222

5,418

19,627

80%

73%

86%

71%

2,131

300

1,070

468

293

2,134

3,867

2,186

1,636

2,232

58%

583

459

124

1,072

1,029

705
949

997

702
941
998

(11%)

4%

(14%)

3%

(26%)

(4%)

(12%)

14%

(4%)

(7%)

(14%)

39%

(1%)

5%

0%

(3%)

(4%)

21%

(10%)

(12%)

3%

(4%)

(2%)

0%

2%

3%

5%

(5%)

0%

(22%)

4%

0%
1%
0%

189,456

26,942

157,868

4,646

0.93

10.52

2.29

36,724

8,338

5,377

5,656

17,353

82%

76%

87%

74%

2,218

336

1,070

547

265

2,223

3,128

2,035

1,050

1,642

52%

627

380

247

924

634
828
938

a.   Barrick is the operator of Nevada Gold Mines and owns 61.5% with Newmont Corporation owning the remaining 38.5%. Nevada Gold Mines is accounted for 
as a subsidiary with a 38.5% non-controlling interest. These results represent the combined results of Cortez, Goldstrike (including our 60% share of South 
Arturo) and our 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge until June 30, 2019. Commencing July 1, 2019, the date Nevada Gold Mines was established, the results 
represent our 61.5% interest in Cortez, Carlin, Turquoise Ridge (including Twin Creeks), Phoenix and Long Canyon. Carlin includes Goldstrike and our share 
of South Arturo. On September 7, 2021, Barrick announced NGM had entered into an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire the 40% interest in 
South Arturo that NGM did not already own in exchange for the Lone Tree and Buffalo Mountain properties and infrastructure. Operating results within our 
61.5% interest in Carlin includes NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo up until May 30, 2021, and 100% interest thereafter, reflecting the terms of the Exchange 
Agreement which closed on October 14, 2021. 
b.  Excludes the Gold Quarry (Mill 5) concentrator. 
c.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
d.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.
e.  Amounts presented exclude capitalized interest.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 073

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisNevada  Gold  Mines  includes  Carlin,  Cortez,  Turquoise  Ridge, 
Phoenix  and  Long  Canyon.  Barrick  is  the  operator  of  the  joint 
venture  and  owns  61.5%,  with  Newmont  owning  the  remaining 
38.5%.  Refer  to  the  following  pages  for  a  detailed  discussion  of 
each minesite’s results.

The  tax  does  not  take  into  consideration  expenses  or  costs 
incurred  to  generate  gross  proceeds,  therefore,  it  is  treated  as  
a  gross  receipts  tax  and  not  as  a  tax  based  on  income  subject  to 
IAS 12. As a result, this new tax is reported as a component of cost 
of sales and not as an income tax expense.

Regulatory Matters
Mining Education tax
The  Nevada  Legislative  Session  ended  on  May  31,  2021  with  the 
passing  of  Assembly  Bill  495,  now  named  the  Mining  Education 
Tax,  which  is  a  new  mining  excise  tax  applied  to  gross  proceeds. 
Importantly,  the  revenue  generated  by  this  new  excise  tax  will  be 
directed towards education. This new tax became effective on July 1,  
2021  and  is  a  tiered  tax,  with  the  highest  rate  at  1.1%,  the  first 
payment of which is expected in April 2022. The bill was a negotiated 
alternative to the three resolutions that were passed in the special 
session that commenced on July 31, 2020, none of which passed a 
second approval in the legislative session ended on May 31, 2021. 
This was a positive outcome and the result of months of negotiation 
between  Barrick,  the  Nevada  Mining  Association,  legislators,  the 
Nevada Governor’s office and other key stakeholders. 

A number of rural Nevada counties and NGM had filed lawsuits 
in  the  Nevada  District  Court,  challenging  the  constitutionality 
of  the  three  resolutions  from  July  2020.  These  lawsuits  were 
subsequently  consolidated  into  one.  On  January  27,  2021,  the 
Nevada District Court granted a summary judgment in favor of the 
Nevada  Legislature,  concluding  that  the  matter  is  not  yet  ripe  for 
adjudication.  On  February  24,  2021,  NGM  filed  an  appeal  to  this 
decision to the Nevada Supreme Court. The Nevada Supreme Court 
has ordered the appeal dismissed as moot and that the district court 
decision does not have precedential effect.

Federal tax and royalty
In  July  2021,  the  U.S.  Congress  began  discussing  proposed 
changes  to  the  General  Mining  Law  of  1872  (“General  Mining 
Law”) which governs mining activities on federal land in the United 
States.  The  General  Mining  Law  was  designed  to  incentivize  
mining  activity  on  federal  lands  by  granting  miners  the  right 
to  prospect,  explore,  and  mine  while  meeting  all  applicable 
environmental and other regulatory requirements, generating fees, 
taxable  revenue,  investment  and  employment  benefiting  the  U.S. 
federal  and  state  governments.  Nevada  Gold  Mines  conducts  a 
portion of its mining activities on federal lands in Nevada pursuant 
to the General Mining Law. 

The U.S. House version of the Build Back Better Act (the “Act”) 
contained provisions that would have amended the General Mining 
Law; however, the Act failed to reach a vote in the U.S. Senate. The 
Company was engaged in constructive discussions with legislators 
and  affected  stakeholders  regarding  the  proposed  changes  to  the 
General Mining Law that were included in the Act. The Company will 
continue  to  be  engaged  on  any  proposed  changes  to  the  General 
Mining  Law  and  continues  to  support  updates  that  will  result  in  a 
more  secure  legal  framework  for  Barrick  and  the  U.S.  hard  rock 
mining industry as a whole.

074

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisCARLIN (61.5% basis)a, NEVADA USA

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Total tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Underground

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Underground mined

Processed

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

Oxide mill

Roaster

Autoclave

Heap leach
Recovery rateb
Roaster

Autoclave

Gold produced (000s oz)

Oxide mill

Roaster

Autoclave

Heap leach

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)c
EBITDA margind
Capital expenditures ($ millions)e

Minesite sustainingc
Projectc

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)c
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)c
All-in costs ($/oz)c

17,833

1,381

15,622

830

0.91

9.23

3.48

3,373

671

1,029

571

1,102

78%

85%

47%

295

23

229

27

16

297

535

268

247

298

56%

63

63

0

899

728

950

950

19,839

2,777

16,285

777

0.69

8.98

2.36

4,627

629

817

569

(10%)

(50%)

(4%)

7%

32%

3%

47%

(27%)

7%

26%

0%

2,612

(58%)

77%

85%

48%

209

12

164

26

7

202

359

205

147

188

52%

55

55

0

1,017

814

1,124

1,124

1%

0%

(2%)

41%

92%

40%

4%

129%

47%

49%

31%

68%

59%

8%

15%

15%

0%

(12%)

(11%)

(15%)

(15%)

75,207

6,472

65,507

3,228

0.78

8.85

2.97

72,820

6,054

63,579

3,187

2.08

9.36

3.69

14,282

12,195

2,735

3,616

2,221

5,710

77%

85%

46%

923

51

728

102

42

922

1,653

893

733

903

55%

260

260

0

968

782

1,087

1,087

2,936

3,743

3,071

2,445

79%

86%

57%

1,024

38

784

161

41

1,024

1,812

999

795

983

54%

231

231

0

976

790

1,041

1,041

3%

7%

3%

1%

(63%)

(5%)

(20%)

17%

(7%)

(3%)

(28%)

134%

(3%)

(1%)

(19%)

(10%)

34%

(7%)

(37%)

2%

(10%)

(9%)

(11%)

(8%)

(8%)

2%

13%

13%

0%

(1%)

(1%)

4%

4%

49,343

4,773

41,978

2,592

2.08

9.09

3.80

10,467

1,368

3,627

4,169

1,303

75%

86%

59%

968

25

694

225

24

967

1,355

971

370

609

45%

211

211

0

1,004

746

984

984

a.   On July 1, 2019, Barrick’s Goldstrike and Newmont’s Carlin were contributed to Nevada Gold Mines and are now collectively referred to as Carlin. As a result, 
the amounts presented represent Goldstrike on a 100% basis (including our 60% share of South Arturo) up until June 30, 2019, and the combined results of 
Carlin and Goldstrike (including our share of South Arturo) on a 61.5% basis thereafter. On September 7, 2021, Barrick announced NGM had entered into 
an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire the 40% interest in South Arturo that NGM did not already own in exchange for the Lone Tree and Buffalo 
Mountain properties and infrastructure. Operating results within our 61.5% interest in Carlin includes NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo up until May 30, 
2021, and 100% interest thereafter, reflecting the terms of the Exchange Agreement which closed on October 14, 2021.

b.  Excludes the Gold Quarry (Mill 5) concentrator. 
c.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
d.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.
e.  Amounts presented exclude capitalized interest. 

Safety and Environment
There  were  two  lost  time  injuries  (“LTI”)  recorded  at  Carlin  during 
the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  0.99, 
compared  to  0.97  in  the  prior  quarter.  The  TRIFR8  for  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021  was  3.47  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to 
2.42 in the prior quarter. 

There  were  10  LTIs  recorded  in  2021,  which  resulted  in  an 
LTIFR8 of 1.19, compared to 1.06 in 2020. The TRIFR8 for 2021 was 
3.08 per million hours worked, compared to 3.48 in the prior year. 
No Class 19 environmental incidents occurred during 2021 or 2020.

Financial Results 
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Carlin’s income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 68% higher than 
the  prior  quarter  due  to  a  significant  increase  in  sales  volume,  a 
lower cost of sales per ounce7 and a higher realized gold price6.

Gold  production  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  41%  higher 
compared to the prior quarter, mainly resulting from higher roaster 
production  due  to  the  previously  disclosed  mechanical  mill  failure 
at the Goldstrike roaster on May 26, 2021, which resulted in a 40% 
reduction in throughput for the majority of the third quarter. Repairs 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 075

Management’s Discussion and Analysiswere  completed  by  the  end  of  September,  ahead  of  schedule. 
Mitigating  actions  taken  in  the  third  quarter  of  2021  included  the 
prioritization  of  ore  with  higher  carbonaceous  content  for  the 
majority of the quarter to take advantage of the extra retention time 
in  the  roasting  circuit  to  deliver  a  higher  recovery  rate  from  this 
type of ore. Those actions allowed the complex to optimize roaster 
throughput  and  recoveries,  which  positively  impacted  the  fourth 
quarter of 2021. Higher grade underground ore stockpiled through 
the  roaster  repair  period,  as  described  above,  was  processed  in 
the  fourth  quarter  of  2021.  Total  tonnes  mined  were  10%  lower 
compared to the prior quarter, driven by the open pit. Open pit ore 
tonnes mined were 50% lower compared to the prior quarter, driven 
by a decrease in heap leach ore mined from the Gold Quarry and 
Gold Star open pits as planned. Average open pit mined grade was 
32% higher than the prior quarter, due to a lower proportion of heap 
leach  ore  mined.  Underground  mined  tonnes  and  grade  were  7% 
and  3%  higher,  respectively,  than  the  prior  quarter  due  to  mine 
sequencing across Carlin’s underground operations.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in  
the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  12%  and  11%  lower,  respectively, 
than  the  prior  quarter  due  to  continued  cost  discipline  combined 
with  the  impact  of  higher  sales  volume.  In  the  fourth  quarter  of  
2021,  all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  decreased  by  15% 
compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to lower total cash costs 
per ounce6 and lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures6 on 
a per ounce basis.

Capital expenditures in the fourth quarter of 2021 increased by 
15%  compared  to  the  prior  quarter,  due  to  an  increase  in  waste 
tonnes from increased stripping at Goldstrike 5th NW and Gold Star 
Phase  3,  partially  offset  by  lower  sustaining  capital  expenditures6 
and underground capital development.

2021 compared to 2020
Carlin’s  income  for  the  twelve  month  period  ended  December  31, 
2021 was 8% lower than the same prior year period primarily due to 
a decrease in sales volume, partially offset by a slightly lower cost 
of sales per ounce7 and a higher realized gold price6.

INCOME AND EBITDA6,a

1,393

609

370

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

1,770

1,799

1,800

1,500

983

795

733

903

1,200

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

a.   The  results  represent  Goldstrike  on  a  100%  basis  (including  our  60% 
share  of  South  Arturo)  from  January  1,  2019  to  June  30,  2019  and  the 
combined results of Carlin and Goldstrike (including NGM’s 60% interest 
in South Arturo up until May 30, 2021 and 100% interest thereafter) on a 
61.5% basis from July 1, 2019 onwards.

Gold production for the twelve month period ended December 31, 
2021  was  10%  lower  compared  to  the  prior  year,  mainly  due  to 
the  previously  disclosed  mechanical  mill  failure  at  the  Goldstrike 
roaster, which negatively impacted production in the current year. In 
addition, lower production from the Goldstrike autoclave was mainly 
driven  by  the  transition  from  acid  to  alkaline  ore.  As  previously 
disclosed, the Goldstrike autoclave completed processing of acidic 
ore  at  the  end  of  the  third  quarter  of  2020.  Total  tonnes  mined 
increased 3% compared to the same prior year period, mainly due 
to shorter hauls as the Goldstrike pit has transitioned from mining 
ore in the 4th NW layback to stripping of the 5th NW layback. Open 
pit ore tonnes mined increased by 7% compared to the same prior 
year  period  due  to  an  increase  in  heap  leach  ore  mined  from  the 
Gold  Quarry  and  Gold  Star  open  pits,  offsetting  the  transition  to 
stripping  at  the  Goldstrike  open  pit  as  described  above.  Average 
open  pit  mined  grade  decreased  by  63%  due  to  the  mining  of  a 
higher proportion of heap leach ore compared to the same prior year 
period. Underground tonnes mined were 1% higher compared to the 
same prior year period due to upgraded equipment and increased 
haulage capacity, while underground mined grade decreased by 5% 
driven  by  a  change  in  the  mix  of  ore  sources  across  the  different 
underground operations as per the mine plan.

PRODUCTIONa 
(thousands of ounces)

1,200

600

0

1,024

923

950
to
1,030

2020

2021

2022 (est)b

a.   The results include NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo up until May 30, 

2021 and 100% interest thereafter. 

b.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  for  the 
twelve month period ended December 31, 2021 were slightly lower 
than  the  same  prior  year  period,  with  operating  cost  discipline 
offsetting  the  impact  of  lower  sales  volume.  For  the  twelve-month 
period December 31, 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 was 
4% higher than the prior year, primarily due to the impact of higher 
minesite sustaining capital expenditures6. 

COST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6 
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

1,041

976

790

968

1,087

782

900
to
980

1,020
to
1,100
730
to
790

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a.   Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

076

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisCapital expenditures for the twelve month period ended December 31,  
2021  increased  by  13%  from  the  prior  year  due  to  an  increase  in 
capitalized waste stripping and the purchase of an oxygen plant at 
the  Goldstrike  autoclave,  which  was  previously  owned  by  a  third 
party and is expected to reduce operating costs going forward.

2021 compared to Guidance 
Gold  production  for  2021  of  923  thousand  ounces  was  below  the 
guidance  range  of  940  to  1,000  thousand  ounces  as  a  result  of 

the  previously  disclosed  mechanical  mill  failure  at  the  Goldstrike 
roaster  on  May  26,  2021  which  was  repaired  in  late  September. 
Despite lower production and inflationary pressures, rigorous cost 
discipline  resulted  in  all  cost  metrics  coming  in  within  guidance. 
Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  of  $968  was  within  the  guidance  range 
of $920 to $970 per ounce. Total cash costs per ounce6 and all-in 
sustaining costs per ounce6 of $782 and $1,087, respectively, were 
also  within  the  guidance  ranges  of  $740  to  $790  per  ounce,  and 
$1,050 to $1,100 per ounce, respectively. 

CORTEZ (61.5% basis)a, NEVADA USA

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

Total tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Underground

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Underground mined

Processed

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

Oxide mill

Roaster

Autoclave

Heap leach

Recovery rate

Oxide Mill

Roaster

Autoclave

Gold produced (000s oz)

Oxide mill

Roaster

Autoclave

Heap leach

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)
Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)d

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

17,996

4,528

13,136

332

0.62

10.96

1.28

5,413

673

357

10

17,515

4,893

12,295

327

0.63

9.40

1.01

5,917

667

291

n/a

4,373

4,959

83%

75%

90%

81%

169

61

79

1

28

170

306

167

139

194

63%

49

31

18

984

657

853

958

85%

80%

89%

n/a

130

52

50

n/a

28

126

226
147

77

123

54%

48

31

17

1,164

800

1,065

1,199

3%

(7%)

7%

2%

(2%)

17%

27%

(9%)

1%

23%

n/a

(12%)

(2%)

(6%)

1%

n/a

30%

17%

58%

n/a

0%

35%

35%
14%

81%

58%

17%

2%

0%

6%

(15%)

(18%)

(20%)

(20%)

74,960

15,456

58,235

1,269

0.71

9.45

1.22

85,740

11,392

73,240

1,108

0.56

9.86

1.41

18,333

13,019

2,548

1,250

10

14,525

83%

78%

88%

81%

509

192

232

1

84

508

913

570

337

518

57%

177

118

59

1,122

763

1,013

1,129

2,432

1,479

n/a

9,108

83%

75%

87%

n/a

491

129

286

n/a

76

491

865
470

385

523

60%

235

145

90

958

678

998

1,179

(13%)

36%

(20%)

15%

27%

(4%)

(13%)

41%

5%

(15%)

n/a

59%

0%

4%

1%

n/a

4%

49%

(19%)

n/a

11%

3%

6%
21%

(12%)

(1%)

(5%)

(25%)

(19%)

(34%)

17%

13%

2%

(4%)

12/31/19

105,949

14,640

90,029

1,280

0.67

10.66

1.60

17,583

3,462

1,750

n/a

12,371

86%

78%

87%

n/a

801

253

376

n/a

172

798

1,086
608

459

656

60%

294

90

204

762

515

651

903

a.   On July 1, 2019, Cortez was contributed to Nevada Gold Mines, a joint venture with Newmont. As a result, the amounts presented are on a 100% basis up 
until June 30, 2019, and on a 61.5% basis thereafter. Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez 
management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush. 

b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.
d.  Amounts presented exclude capitalized interest. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 077

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisSafety and Environment
There were three LTIs recorded at Cortez during the fourth quarter 
of 2021, which resulted in a LTIFR8 of 3.21 per million hours worked, 
compared  to  1.01  in  the  prior  quarter.  The  TRIFR8  for  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021  was  3.21  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to 
3.04 in the prior quarter. 

There were seven LTIs recorded in 2021, which resulted in an 
LTIFR8 of 1.81 per million hours worked, compared to 0.24 in 2020. 
The TRIFR8 for 2021 was 2.85 per million hours worked, compared 
to  2.59  in  the  prior  year.  No  Class  19  environmental  incidents 
occurred during 2021 or 2020. 

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Cortez’s income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 81% higher than 
the prior quarter due to substantially higher sales volume, a lower 
cost of sales per ounce7 and a higher realized gold price6.

Gold  production  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  30%  higher 
compared to the prior quarter. This was primarily driven by higher 
grade  refractory  production  at  the  Carlin  roasters  (including  batch 
processing of trial Goldrush ore), following the previously disclosed 
mechanical  mill  failure  at  the  Goldstrike  roaster  which  impacted 
third quarter production. Open pit ore tonnes mined were 7% lower 
compared to the prior quarter, driven primarily by the open pit mine 
sequence  at  Crossroads.  Underground  tonnes  mined  were  2% 
higher  compared  to  the  prior  quarter  due  to  higher  underground 
tonnes mined from the Goldrush development project. 

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in 
the fourth quarter of 2021 were 15% and 18% lower, respectively, 
versus  the  prior  quarter  due  to  sales  mix  with  a  higher  proportion 
from  lower  cost  underground,  production.  In  the  fourth  quarter  of 
2021,  all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  were  20%  lower  than  the 
prior quarter, driven by lower total cash costs per ounce6.

Capital  expenditures  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  2% 
higher  compared  to  the  prior  quarter  due  to  higher  project  capital 
expenditures6. Minesite sustaining capital expenditure6 spend was 
comparable quarter-on-quarter. 

2021 compared to 2020 
Cortez’s income for the twelve month period ended December 31, 
2021 was 12% lower than the same prior year period, primarily due 
to  a  higher  cost  of  sales  per  ounce7,  partially  offset  by  the  higher 
realized gold price6 and higher sales volume.

INCOME AND EBITDA6,a

1,770

1,799

800

600

1,393

656

400

459

200

0

523

518

385

337

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

a.   The results are on a 100% basis from January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 

and on a 61.5% basis from July 1, 2019 onwards.

Gold production for the twelve month period ended December 31, 
2021 was 4% higher than the same prior year period, mainly due to 
an increase in oxide mill and heap leach production, partially offset 
by  a  reduction  in  refractory  ore  processed  at  the  Carlin  roasters. 
The  increase  in  oxide  mill  and  heap  leach  production  was  due  to 
higher  grade  ore  and  increased  volumes  mined  from  the  Pipeline 
and  Crossroads  open  pits.  Lower  refractory  ore  tonnes  were 
processed  at  the  Carlin  roasters  due  to  displacement  by  higher 
grade  Carlin  refractory  ore.  Open  pit  ore  tonnes  mined  increased 
36% over the same prior year period largely due to increased ore 
mined  from  the  Crossroads  open  pit.  Underground  tonnes  mined 
increased  15%  over  the  same  prior  year  period,  mainly  driven  by 
increased underground development activity at Goldrush.

PRODUCTIONa 
(thousands of ounces)

900

450

0

491

509

480
to
530

2020

2021

2022 (est)b

a.   The results are on a 100% basis from January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 

and on a 61.5% basis from July 1, 2019 onwards.

b.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  for  the 
twelve month period ended December 31, 2021 were 17% and 13% 
higher, respectively, than the same prior year period, mainly due to 
a  higher  proportion  of  higher  cost  open  pit  ounces,  partially  offset 
by the impact of higher sales volume. The higher cost of sales per 
ounce7  was  also  driven  by  higher  depreciation  expense.  For  the 
twelve  month  period  ended  December  31,  2021,  all-in  sustaining 
costs per ounce6 increased by 2% compared to the same prior year 
period, driven by higher total cash costs per ounce6, partially offset 
by lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures6.

COST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6  
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

998

958

678

1,122

1,013

763

970
to
1,050

1,010
to
1,090

650
to
710

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a. Based on the midpoint of the guidance range

078

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisCapital expenditures for the twelve month period ended December 31,  
2021 were 25% lower than the prior year due to both lower minesite 
sustaining6  and  project  capital  expenditures6.  Minesite  sustaining 
capital  expenditures6  were  19%  lower  compared  to  the  same 
prior year period, primarily due to a decrease in capitalized waste 
stripping  as  relatively  more  mining  activity  occurred  in  operating 
phases  of  the  Crossroads  and  Pipeline  open  pits.  Lower  project 
capital  expenditures6  were  due  to  lower  cost  development  and 
exploration activities at Goldrush underground in the current period 
whereas  in  the  same  prior  year  period,  activity  mainly  related  to 
Goldrush twin decline development, Goldrush power infrastructure, 
and the Cortez Hills Rangefront Decline project.

2021 compared to Guidance
Gold  production  for  2021  of  509  thousand  ounces  was  within  the 
guidance range of 500 to 550 thousand ounces. Cost of sales per 
ounce7 for 2021 was $1,122, above the guidance range of $1,000 
to  $1,050  per  ounce.  Higher  than  expected  open  pit  maintenance 
costs  contributed  to  higher  operating  costs.  Total  cash  costs  per 
ounce6  of  $763  was  also  above  the  guidance  range  of  $700  to 
$750  per  ounce,  and  all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  of  $1,013 
was higher than guidance of $940 to $990 per ounce due to higher 
sustaining capital expenditures6.

TURQUOISE RIDGE (61.5%)a, NEVADA USA

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Total tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Underground

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Underground mined
Processed

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

Oxide Mill

Autoclave

Heap leach

Recovery Rate

Oxide Mill

Autoclave

Gold produced (000s oz)

Oxide Mill

Autoclave

Heap leach

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)
Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

235

35

0

200

1.72

10.36
4.12

747

125

622

0

81%

81%

81%

82

4

74

4

84

151

100

51

82

54%

19

14

5

1,194

819

996

1,061

1,581

785

575

221

1.36

10.04
2.94

1,075

105

635

335

82%

84%

82%

82

4

76

2

82

146

95
51

82

56%

21

12

9

1,169

788

943

1,053

(85%)

(96%)

(100%)

(10%)

26%

3%
40%

(31%)

19%

(2%)

(100%)

(1%)

(4%)

(1%)

0%

0%

(3%)

100%

2%

3%

5%
0%

0%

(4%)

(10%)

17%

(44%)

2%

4%

6%

1%

8,510

3,020

4,656

834

1.69

10.69
3.31

3,793

434

2,452

907

82%

83%

82%

334

16

307

11

337

607

378

229

352

58%

81

47

34

15,483

5,150

9,460

873

2.24

10.44
3.42

3,613

458

2,346

809

83%

88%

83%

330

16%

306

8

332

589

353
229

342

58%

51

24

27

1,122

1,064

749

892

993

711

798

879

(45%)

(41%)

(51%)

(4%)

(25%)

2%
(3%)

5%

(5%)

5%

12%

(1%)

(6%)

(1%)

1%

0%

0%

38%

2%

3%

7%
0%

3%

0%

59%

96%

26%

5%

5%

12%

13%

9,001

1,340

6,887

774

1.37

14.44
5.62

2,201

221

1,483

497

89%

87%

89%

335

8

321

6

356

504

300
201

293

58%

85

50

35

846

585

732

834

a.   Prior  to  July  1,  2019,  Barrick  owned  75%  of  Turquoise  Ridge  with  our  joint  venture  partner,  Newmont,  owning  the  remaining  25%.  Turquoise  Ridge  was 
proportionately  consolidated  on  the  basis  that  the  joint  venture  partners  that  have  joint  control  have  rights  to  the  assets  and  obligations  for  the  liabilities 
relating  to  the  arrangement. The  figures  presented  in  this  table  are  based  on  our  75%  interest  in Turquoise  Ridge  until  June  30,  2019.  On  July  1,  2019, 
Barrick’s 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge and Newmont’s 100% interest in Twin Creeks and 25% interest in Turquoise Ridge were contributed to Nevada Gold 
Mines. Starting July 1, 2019, the results represent our 61.5% share of Turquoise Ridge and Twin Creeks, now collectively referred to as Turquoise Ridge.

b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 079

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisSafety and Environment
There were three LTIs recorded at Turquoise Ridge during the fourth 
quarter  of  2021,  which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  4.29  per  million 
hours  worked,  compared  to  5.81  in  the  prior  quarter.  The  TRIFR8 
for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  8.58  per  million  hours  worked, 
compared to 4.36 in the prior quarter. 

There  were  eight  LTIs  recorded  in  2021,  which  resulted  in  an  
LTIFR8  of  2.85  per  million  hours  worked  compared  to  2.51  million  
hours  in  2020.  The  TRIFR8  for  2021  was  4.63  per  million  hours  
worked, compared to 4.31 in the prior year. No Class 19 environmental  
incidents occurred during 2021 or 2020.

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021 
Turquoise Ridge’s income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was in line 
with the prior quarter as higher sales volume and a higher realized 
gold price6 were offset by an increase in cost of sales per ounce7. 
Gold production in the fourth quarter of 2021 was in line with the 
prior  quarter.  Total  tonnes  mined  decreased  by  85%  compared  to 
the prior quarter, driven by lower open pit production as the current 
phase  of  fresh  ore  mining  ramped  down  and  was  completed  in 
the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  as  expected  and  previously  disclosed. 
We  continue  to  expect  open  pit  mining  to  resume  in  the  medium-
to-long  term  at  Cut  40,  with  the  analysis  of  an  optimized  restart 
currently  under  review.  Underground  tonnes  mined  decreased  by 
10%  compared  to  the  prior  quarter.  Equipment  issues  continued 
to  impact  performance  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  including  a 
battery fire in mid-October, which resulted in the loss of the electric 
truck  fleet  for  the  remainder  of  the  fourth  quarter  at  the  direction 
of  the  Mine  Safety  and  Health Administration  (MSHA),  pending  a 
investigation into the cause of the fire. Once resolved, we expect to 
continue trialing battery-powered Sandvik haul trucks, together with 
the  continued  use  of  conventional  mining  equipment  at  Turquoise 
Ridge Underground. 

Cost of sales per ounce7 and total cash costs per ounce6 in the 
fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  2%  and  4%  higher,  respectively,  than 
the prior quarter mainly due to the processing of a higher proportion 
of  lower  grade  open  pit  ore  (including  ore  stockpiled  from  prior 
quarters  of  the  year)  which  carries  a  higher  cost  on  a  per  ounce 
basis. All-in sustaining costs per ounce6 increased by 6% compared 
to the prior quarter, primarily reflecting higher total cash costs per 
ounce6 and higher sustaining capital expenditures6.

Capital  expenditures  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  decreased 
by  10%  compared  to  the  prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  lower 
project  capital  expenditures6  on  the  Third  Shaft  project,  partially 
offset  by  higher  sustaining  capital  expenditures6.  Project  capital 
expenditures6 on the Third Shaft project was lower due to delays in 
shaft steel placement, while higher sustaining capital expenditures6 
was related to the timing of underground equipment purchases.

2021 compared to 2020 
Turquoise  Ridge’s  income  for  the  twelve  month  period  ended 
December 31, 2021 was in line with the prior year, as higher sales 
volume and a higher realized gold price6 were offset by an increase 
in cost of sales per ounce7. 

INCOME AND EBITDA6,a

1,770

1,799

1,393
1,268

293

201

342

352

229

229

400

300

200

100

0

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

a.   The  results  represent  Turquoise  Ridge  on  a  75%  basis  from  January  1, 
2019 to June 30, 2019 and the combined results of Turquoise Ridge and 
Twin Creeks on a 61.5% basis from July 1, 2019 onwards.

Gold production for the twelve month period ended December 31, 
2021  was  1%  higher  compared  to  the  prior  year,  primarily  due  to 
improved grades from Turquoise Ridge underground combined with 
improved throughput at the Sage autoclave, partially offset by lower 
underground tonnes mined. Total tonnes mined were lower by 45% 
relative to the same prior year period due to a decrease in open pit 
tonnes  as  the  current  phases  of  fresh  ore  mining  were  completed 
in the fourth quarter of 2021, as expected and previously disclosed. 
We  continue  to  expect  open  pit  mining  to  resume  in  the  medium-
to-long term at Cut 40, with the economics of an optimized restart 
currently under review. In addition, underground tonnes were lower 
by  4%  relative  to  the  same  prior  year  period  as  higher  operating 
rates  were  more  than  offset  by  lower  equipment  availability  and 
ventilation constraints.

PRODUCTIONa 
(thousands of ounces)

500

250

0

330

334

330
to
370

2020

2021

2022 (est)b

a.   The  results  represent  Turquoise  Ridge  on  a  75%  basis  from  January  1, 
2019 to June 30, 2019 and the combined results of Turquoise Ridge and 
Twin Creeks on a 61.5% basis from July 1, 2019 onwards.

b.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  for 
the  twelve  month  period  ended  December  31,  2021  were  both 
5%  higher  than  the  same  prior  year  period  due  to  the  impact  of 
lower  grades  processed,  which  was  driven  by  a  higher  proportion 
of  lower  grade  open  pit  ore  versus  the  same  prior  year  period.  
All-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  increased  by  12%  compared  to 
the prior year due to higher total cash costs per ounce6, and higher 
minesite sustaining capital expenditures6. 

080

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisCOST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6 
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

1,064

1,122

798
711

892

749

1,100
to
1,090

930
to
1,010

770
to
830

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

OTHER MINES – NEVADA GOLD MINES

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA 

Capital expenditures for the twelve month period ended December 31,  
2021  increased  by  59%  compared  to  the  same  prior  year  period,  
mainly due to an increase in minesite sustaining capital expenditures6  
relating to underground equipment purchases and process efficiency  
related  projects.  This  was  combined  with  higher  project  capital 
expenditures6 related to the Third Shaft project. 

2021 compared to Guidance
As  expected  and  previously  disclosed,  gold  production  in  2021 
of  334  thousand  ounces  was  below  the  guidance  range  of  390  to 
440 thousand ounces. This was mainly due to lower than planned 
underground equipment availability and utilization, as well as lower 
plant availability. Cost of sales per ounce7 and total cash costs per 
ounce6 of $1,122 and $749, respectively, were above the guidance 
ranges of $950 to $1,000 per ounce and $620 to $670 per ounce, 
respectively, mainly due to the impact of lower sales volumes which 
reflected this underperformance. All-in sustaining costs per ounce6 
of $892 was above the guidance range of $810 to $860 per ounce 
for similar reasons. 

For the three months ended

Gold 
produced
(000s oz)

25

33

Cost of
sales
($/oz)

2,047

999

12/31/21

Total
cash
costs
($/oz)a

All-in
sustaining
costs
($/oz)a

443

325

614

384

Capital
Expend-
ituresb

Gold
produced
(000s oz) 

4

1

31

43

Cost of
sales
($/oz)

1,777

796

9/30/21
Total
cash
costs
($/oz)a
499

All-in
sustaining
costs
($/oz)a
582

Capital
Expend-
ituresb
2

201

251

1

Phoenix (61.5%)c
Long Canyon (61.5%)

a.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
b.  Includes both minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. 
c.   On September 7, 2021, NGM announced it had entered into an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire the 40% interest in South Arturo that NGM 
did not already own in exchange for the Lone Tree and Buffalo Mountain properties and infrastructure. Operating results within our 61.5% interest in Phoenix 
includes Lone Tree up until May 30, 2021, reflecting the terms of the Exchange Agreement which closed on October 14, 2021.

Phoenix (61.5%)
Gold production for Phoenix in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 19% 
lower compared to the prior quarter driven by the divestment of Lone 
Tree (part of the Phoenix operations) following the execution of the 
Exchange Agreement between NGM and i-80 Gold. Pursuant to this 
agreement,  NGM  exchanged  Lone  Tree  and  Buffalo  Mountain  for 
i-80 Gold’s 40% interest in South Arturo (included within the Carlin 
operations).  This  transaction  closed  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021 
and had an effective date of June 1, 2021. Separately, a reduction 
in  tonnes  milled  and  lower  mill  recoveries  also  contributed  to  the 
decrease in quarter-on-quarter production. 

Cost of sales per ounce7 in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 15% 
higher than the prior quarter, primarily due to lower sales volume. 
Total cash costs per ounce6 were 11% lower than the prior quarter 
primarily due to higher by-product credits, partially offset by lower 
sales volume. In the fourth quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs 
per ounce6 increased by 5% compared to the prior quarter, primarily 
due  to  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures6,  partially 
offset by lower total cash costs per ounce6.

Compared  to  our  2021  outlook,  gold  production  of  109 
thousand  ounces  was  within  the  guidance  range  of  100  to  120 
thousand  ounces.  Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  of  $1,922  was  above 
the  guidance  range  of  $1,800  to  $1,850  per  ounce.  Total  cash 
costs per ounce6 and all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 of $398 and  
$533,  respectively,  were  below  the  guidance  ranges  of  $725  to 
$775 per ounce and $970 to $1,020 per ounce, respectively, mainly 
due  to  higher  by-product  credits  driven  by  the  increase  in  copper 
and silver prices. 

Long Canyon (61.5%)
Gold production for Long Canyon in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 
23%  lower  compared  to  the  third  quarter  of  2021,  primarily  due 
to  lower  grade  and  a  reduction  in  ore  tonnes  stacked,  combined 
with  a  higher  stacking  height  leading  to  a  longer  leach  cycle. 
Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in  the  
fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  26%  and  62%  higher  than  the  prior 
quarter,  respectively,  primarily  due  to  these  same  impacts.  All-in 
sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  increased  by  53%  compared  to  the 
prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  the  same  drivers  described  above 
as well as slightly higher sustaining capital expenditures6 resulting 
from haul truck refurbishments. 

Compared to our 2021 outlook, gold production of 161 thousand 
ounces was above the top end of the guidance range of 140 to 160 
thousand ounces. Cost of sales per ounce7 of $739 was well below 
the guidance range of $800 to $850 per ounce. Total cash costs per 
ounce6  and  all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  of  $188  and  $238, 
respectively,  were  near  or  below  the  bottom  end  of  the  guidance 
ranges  of  $180  to  $230  per  ounce  and  $240  to  $290  per  ounce, 
respectively.

We  continue  to  pursue  sales  of  non-core  assets  that  are  not 
aligned  with  Barrick’s  strategic  investment  filters.  We  will  only 
proceed  with  transactions  that  make  sense  for  the  business,  on 
terms we consider favorable to our shareholders. In this regard, we 
intend  to  initiate  a  process  to  explore  the  sale  of  Long  Canyon  in 
the first quarter of 2022.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 081

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
PUEBLO VIEJO (60% basis)a, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Open pit tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Processed

Autoclave ore tonnes processed (000s)

Recovery rate

Gold produced (000s oz)

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

5,626

1,489

4,137

2.57

2.83

1,365

90%

107

113

203

112

90

125

62%

94

27

67

987

612

858

5,926

2,464

3,462

2.28

3.07

1,446

88%

127

125

227

112

113

150

66%

73

24

49

895

521

728

1,453

1,117

(5%)

(40%)

19%

13%

(8%)

(6%)

2%

(16%)

(10%)

(11%)

0%

(20%)

(17%)

(6%)

29%

13%

37%

10%

17%

18%

30%

24,687

7,969

16,718

2.41

3.18

5,466

88%

488

497

898

445

445

587

65%

311

96

215

896

541

745

1,178

20,262

6,147

14,115

2.57

3.61

5,297

89%

542

541

954

443

508

644

68%

134

79

55

819

504

660

761

22%

30%

18%

(6%)

(12%)

3%

(1%)

(10%)

(8%)

(6%)

0%

(12%)

(9%)

(4%)

132%

22%

291%

9%

7%

13%

55%

24,732

8,085

16,647

2.76

3.91

5,164

89%

590

584

843

435

402

522

62%

64

64

0

747

471

592

600

a.   Barrick is the operator of Pueblo Viejo and owns 60% with Newmont Corporation owning the remaining 40%. Pueblo Viejo is accounted for as a subsidiary 

with a 40% non-controlling interest. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are based on our 60% share only.

b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment
There  were  no  LTIs  recorded  at  Pueblo  Viejo  during  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021,  which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  0.00  per  million 
hours worked, a reduction from 0.30 LTIFR8 in the prior quarter. The 
TRIFR8  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  0.46  per  million  hours 
worked, compared to 0.30 in the prior quarter. 

There was one LTI recorded in 2021, which resulted in an LTIFR8 
of  0.07  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to  0.10  in  2020.  The 
TRIFR8  for  2021  was  0.50  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to 
0.73 in the prior year. No Class 19 environmental incidents occurred 
during 2021 or 2020. 

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Pueblo Viejo’s income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 20% lower 
than  the  third  quarter  of  2021  due  to  lower  sales  volume  and  a 
higher cost of sales per ounce7, partially offset by a higher realized 
gold price6. 

Gold  production  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  16%  lower 
than  the  prior  quarter  due  to  lower  throughput  driven  by  planned 
maintenance during the quarter, lower grades processed in line with 
the mine and stockpile processing plan and higher carbon-in-leach 
inventory accumulation. This was partially offset by higher recovery. 

  Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  for 
the fourth quarter of 2021 were 10% and 17% higher, respectively, 
than  the  prior  quarter  primarily  reflecting  the  impact  of  planned 
maintenance  and  higher  natural  gas  prices  in  the  current  quarter. 
This was partially offset by higher margins from third-party energy 
sales  at  the  Quisqueya  power  plant  driven  by  higher  spot  energy 
prices. The increase in cost of sales per ounce7 was also impacted 
by  higher  depreciation  on  a  per  ounce  basis,  resulting  from  the 
impact  of  lower  sales  volumes.  For  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021, 
all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  increased  by  18%  compared  to 
the prior quarter, reflecting higher total cash costs per ounce6 and 
higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures6. 

Capital  expenditures  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  increased 
by  29%  compared  to  the  prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  increased 
project  capital  expenditures6  incurred  on  the  plant  expansion  and 
mine life extension project. This was combined with higher minesite 
sustaining capital expenditures6 related to the Llagal tailings storage 
facility and major maintenance at the Quisqueya power plant.

2021 compared to 2020
Pueblo Viejo’s income for 2021 was 12% lower than the prior year 
due  to  lower  sales  volume  and  a  higher  cost  of  sales  per  ounce7, 
partially offset by the higher realized gold price6. 

082

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisINCOME AND EBITDA6

1,770

1,799

644

508

587

445

1,393
1,268

522

402

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

COST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6 
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

819

660

504

896

745

541

1,070
to
1,105

910
to
990

670
to
730

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2019

2020

2021

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Capital expenditures for 2021 increased by 132% compared to the 
prior year, primarily due to increased project capital expenditures6 
for  the  plant  expansion  and  mine  life  extension  project.  This  was 
combined  with  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures6 
related  to  the  Llagal  tailings  storage  facility,  higher  capitalized 
stripping at the Montenegro open pit and major maintenance at the 
Quisqueya power plant. This was partially offset by the purchase of 
a new fleet for ore rehandling activities occurring in the prior year. 

2021 compared to Guidance
Gold  production  in  2021  of  488  thousand  ounces  was  within  the 
guidance  range  of  470  to  510  thousand  ounces.  Cost  of  sales 
per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  of  $896  and  $541, 
respectively, were within the guidance ranges of $880 to $930 per 
ounce and $520 to $570 per ounce, respectively, despite the impact 
of  higher  energy  prices.  All-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  was 
$745,  which  was  lower  than  the  guidance  range  of  $760  to  $810 
per ounce mainly driven by the deferral of sustaining capital at the 
existing tailings facility.

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

Gold production for 2021 was 10% lower than the prior year, mainly 
due to lower grades processed in line with the mine and stockpile 
processing  plan,  partially  offset  by  higher  tonnes  processed. 
Pueblo  Viejo  once  again  achieved  record  throughput  in  2021  due 
to  improved  maintenance  practices  and  increased  tonnes  per 
operating hour, with throughput 3% higher than the previous record 
set in 2020.

PRODUCTION 
(thousands of ounces)

600

300

0

542

488

400
to
440

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Cost of sales per ounce7 and total cash costs per ounce6 for 2021 
increased by 9% and 7%, respectively, compared to the prior year, 
primarily reflecting the impact of lower grades as described above, 
and  higher  natural  gas  prices.  For  2021,  all-in  sustaining  costs 
per  ounce6  increased  by  13%  compared  to  the  prior  year,  mainly 
reflecting  higher  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  and  higher  minesite 
sustaining capital expenditures6. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 083

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisLOULO-GOUNKOTO (80% basis)a, MALI

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

Total tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Underground

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Underground mined

Processed

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

Recovery rate

Gold produced (000s oz)

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)
Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

7,766

1,208

5,999

559

3.47

4.34

4.25

1,019

91%

126

128

228

145

74

132

58%

50

13

37

1,139

685

822

1,109

8,131

257

7,319

555

2.63

4.65

4.63

1,011

91%

137

134

239
149

84

137

57%

59

42

17

1,109

708

1,056

1,184

(4%)

370%

(18%)

1%

32%

(7%)

(8%)

1%

0%

(8%)

(4%)

(5%)
(3%)

(12%)

(4%)

2%

(15%)

(69%)

118%

3%

(3%)

(22%)

(6%)

33,073

1,808

29,050

2,215

33,036

1,698

29,078

2,260

3.22

4.68

4.79

4,015

91%

560

558

999

585

380

602

60%

238

159

79

1,049

650

970

1,111

5.50

4.36

4.76

3,916

91%

544

542

966
576

358

572

59%

185

170

15

1,060

666

1,006

1,034

0%

6%

0%

(2%)

(41%)

7%

1%

3%

0%

3%

3%

3%
2%

6%

5%

2%

29%

(6%)

427%

(1%)

(2%)

(4%)

7%

32,192

2,726

27,183

2,283

4.83

4.67

4.90

3,945

92%

572

575

806
601

190

426

53%

136

133

3

1,044

634

886

891

a.   Barrick owns 80% of Société des Mines de Loulo SA and Société des Mines de Gounkoto with the Republic of Mali owning 20%. Loulo-Gounkoto is accounted 
for as a subsidiary with a 20% non-controlling interest on the basis that Barrick controls the asset. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are 
based on our 80% share, inclusive of the impact of the purchase price allocation resulting from the Merger. 

b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment
There  were  zero  LTIs  recorded  during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021, 
which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  0.00  per  million  hours  worked 
compared  to  0.00  in  the  prior  quarter.  The  TRIFR8  for  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021  was  0.35  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to 
0.41 in the prior quarter. 

There  were  two  LTIs  recorded  in  2021,  which  resulted  in  an 
LTIFR8 of 0.11 per million hours worked compared to 0.07 in 2020. 
The TRIFR8 for 2021 was 0.92 per million hours worked, compared 
to  1.53  in  the  prior  year.  No  Class  19  environmental  incidents 
occurred during 2021 or 2020.

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Loulo-Gounkoto’s  income  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  12% 
lower than the prior quarter, mainly due to lower sales volume and 
higher cost of sales per ounce7 partially offset by a higher realized 
gold price6.

Gold  production  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  8%  lower 
than the prior quarter, mainly due to lower grades processed, in line 
with the mine plan. 

Cost of sales per ounce7 for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 3% 
higher  than  the  prior  quarter  due  to  higher  depreciation,  partially 
offset  by  lower  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6.  Total  cash  costs  per 
ounce6  was  3%  lower  than  the  prior  quarter  due  to  more  efficient 
power  blends  in  both  the  underground  mine  and  processing 
operations  towards  the  end  of  the  quarter,  partially  offset  by  the 
impact  of  lower  grades.  For  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  all-in 
sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  decreased  by  22%  compared  to  the 
prior  quarter,  primarily  reflecting  lower  minesite  sustaining  capital 
expenditures6, as well as lower total cash costs per ounce6.

Capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2021 decreased by 
15% compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to lower minesite 
sustaining capital expenditures6. This was partially offset by higher 
project capital expenditures6 relating to the continued development 
of Gounkoto underground and the expansion of power capacity.

2021 compared to 2020 
Loulo-Gounkoto’s  income  for  2021  was  6%  higher  than  the  prior 
year, due to a higher realized gold price6, higher sales volume and 
lower cost of sales per ounce7. 

084

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisINCOME AND EBITDA6

1,770

1,799

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

1,393
1,268

426

190

572

602

358

380

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

Gold  production  in  2021  was  3%  higher  compared  to  the  prior  
year,  primarily  due  to  higher  plant  throughput  as  well  as  higher 
grades processed.

PRODUCTION 
(thousands of ounces)

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in 
2021  were  1%  and  2%  lower,  respectively,  compared  to  the 
prior  year,  mainly  due  to  the  impact  of  higher  grades  as  well  as  
lower  underground  mining  costs.  For  2021,  all-in  sustaining 
costs6 were 4% lower compared to the prior year reflecting lower 
total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  and  decreased  minesite  sustaining  
capital expenditures6.

COST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6 
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

1,060

1,006

1,049

666

970

650

1,070
to
1,150

940
to
1,020

680
to
740

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

544

560

510
to
560

Capital  expenditures  in  2021  were  29%  higher  compared  to  the 
prior year, primarily due to higher project capital expenditures6 from 
the  development  of  Gounkoto  underground  and  the  expansion  of 
power capacity. This was slightly offset by lower minesite sustaining 
capital expenditures6.

600

300

0

2020

2021

2022 (est)

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

2021 compared to Guidance
Gold  production  in  2021  of  560  thousand  ounces  was  at  the  top 
end of the guidance range of 510 to 560 thousand ounces. Cost of 
sales per ounce7 of $1,049 was above the guidance range of $980 
to  $1,030  per  ounce,  due  to  higher  depreciation. Total  cash  costs 
per ounce6 and all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 of $650 and $970, 
respectively, were within the guidance ranges of $630 to $680 per 
ounce and $930 to $980 per ounce, respectively. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 085

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisKIBALI (45% basis)a, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

Total tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Underground

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Underground mined

Processed

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

Recovery rate

Gold produced (000s oz)

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

3,866

330

3,082

454

2.43

5.88

3.90

841

89%

94

95

172

93

71

108

63%

19

12

7

979

582

776

844

3,840

361

3,072

407

3.00

5.89

3.73

872

90%

95

93

166

92

74

110

66%

19

11

8

987

597

751

838

1%

(9%)

0%

12%

(19%)

0%

5%

(4%)

(1%)

(1%)

2%

4%

1%

(4%)

(2%)

(5%)

0%

9%

(13%)

(1%)

(3%)

3%

1%

14,657

1,278

11,610

1,769

13,308

1,380

10,091

1,837

2.71

5.63

3.62

3,503

90%

366

367

661

373

278

419

63%

70

54

16

2.22

5.20

3.68

3,434

90%

364

364

648

397

244

418

65%

51

49

2

1,016

1,091

627

818

861

608

778

782

10%

(7%)

15%

(4%)

22%

8%

(2%)

2%

0%

1%

1%

2%

(6%)

14%

0%

(3%)

37%

10%

700%

(7%)

3%

5%

10%

12/31/19

12,273

1,693

8,824

1,756

2.32

5.12

3.80

3,381

89%

366

363

505

403

108

304

60%

43

41

2

1,111

568

693

701

a. Barrick owns 45% of Kibali Goldmines SA (Kibali) with the Democratic Republic of Congo (“DRC”) and our joint venture partner, AngloGold Ashanti, owning 
10% and 45%, respectively. Kibali is accounted for as an equity method investment on the basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have 
rights to the net assets of the joint venture. The figures presented in this table and the discussion that follows are based on our 45% effective interest in Kibali, 
inclusive of the impact of the purchase price allocation resulting from the merger with Randgold.

b. Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment
There  were  no  LTIs  recorded  during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021, 
which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  0.00  per  million  hours  worked, 
consistent with the prior quarter. The TRIFR8 for the fourth quarter 
of  2021  was  1.39  per  million  hours  worked,  an  improvement  from 
1.88 in the prior quarter. 

There  were  two  LTIs  recorded  in  2021,  which  resulted  in  an 
LTIFR8 of 0.14 per million hours worked compared to 0.23 in 2020. 
The TRIFR8 for 2021 was 1.22 per million hours worked, compared 
to  1.59  in  the  prior  year.  No  Class  19  environmental  incidents 
occurred during 2021 or 2020.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was 
in  line  with  the  prior  quarter. Total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  was  3% 
below  the  prior  quarter,  with  fewer  stockpiled  tonnes  processed 
when  compared  to  the  previous  quarter.  All-in  sustaining  costs 
per  ounce6  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  ended  3%  higher  than 
the  prior  quarter,  mainly  due  to  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital 
expenditures6, partially offset by lower total cash costs per ounce6.
Capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2021, were in line 
with  the  prior  quarter.  Slightly  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital 
expenditures7  were  due  to  higher  capitalized  stripping  relative  to 
the prior quarter.

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Kibali’s income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 4% lower than the 
third quarter of 2021 as a result of foreign exchange payment fees 
incurred on dividend payments. 

Gold  production  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  1%  lower 
than  the  prior  quarter,  due  to  fewer  tonnes  processed  in  line  with 
the  mine  plan  for  the  quarter,  partially  offset  by  higher  grades 
processed. Gold sales for the fourth quarter of 2021 were 2% higher 
when compared to the prior quarter, due to the timing of sales.

2021 compared to 2020
Kibali’s  income  for  2021  was  14%  higher  than  the  prior  year  due 
to a higher realized gold price6, lower cost of sales per ounce7 and 
slightly higher sales volume. 

086

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisCOST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6 
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

1,091

1,016

778

608

818

627

990
to
1,070

800
to
880

600
to
660

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Capital  expenditures  in  2021  were  37%  higher  compared  to  the 
prior  year,  due  to  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures6 
related  to  a  tailings  dam  raise,  and  project  capital  expenditures6 
related to the advancement of the Kalimva/Ikamva and Pamao open 
pit projects.

2021 compared to Guidance
Attributable  gold  production  in  2021  of  366  thousand  ounces  was 
near  the  midpoint  of  the  guidance  range  of  350  to  380  thousand 
ounces.  Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  of  $1,016  was  within  guidance 
range  of  $990  to  $1,040  per  ounce.  Total  cash  costs  per  ounce6 
of  $627  were  also  within  the  guidance  range  of  $590  to  $640  per 
ounce, while all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 of $818 were at the 
lower end of the guidance range of $800 to $850 per ounce.

INCOME AND EBITDA6

450

300

150

0

1,393

304

108

1,770

1,799

1,800

1,500

418

419

1,200

244

278

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

Gold  production  in  2021  was  slightly  higher  compared  to  the  
prior  year  due  to  higher  throughput,  partially  offset  by  lower  
grades processed.

PRODUCTION 
(thousands of ounces)

400

200

0

364

366

340
to
380

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  in  2021  decreased  by  7%  compared  to 
the  prior  year  due  to  lower  depreciation  expense,  partially  offset 
by  higher  total  cash  costs6.  Total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  were 
3%  higher,  mainly  due  to  higher  labor  and  logistics  charges  due 
to  pandemic-related  travel  restrictions.  This  was  partially  offset 
by  lower  energy  costs  driven  by  an  improved  hydro  power  blend 
in  the  first  half  of  2021  and  relatively  lower  fuel  prices.  For  2021, 
all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 was 5% higher compared to the 
prior year, reflecting higher total cash costs per ounce6 and higher 
minesite sustaining capital expenditures6.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 087

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisVELADERO (50% basis)a, ARGENTINA

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Open pit tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Processed

Heap leach ore tonnes processed (000s)

Gold produced (000s oz)

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

8,997

3,308

5,689

0.85

0.81

3,442

61

83

153

109

43

80

52%

28

22

6

1,279

834

1,113

1,179

8,837

3,267

5,570

0.69

0.71

3,126

48

44

81

58

24

41

51%

29

29

0

1,315

882

1,571

1,571

2%

1%

2%

23%

14%

10%

27%

89%

89%

88%

79%

95%

2%

(3%)

(24%)

100%

(3%)

(5%)

(29%)

(25%)

37,787

10,629

27,158

0.77

0.77

29,108

13,678

15,430

0.78

0.84

11,114

12,017

172

206

382

262

118

203

53%

142

136

6

1,256

816

1,493

1,520

226

186

333

213

114

183

55%

113

98

15

1,151

748

1,308

1,390

30%

(22%)

76%

(1%)

(8%)

(8%)

(24%)

11%

15%

23%

4%

11%

(3%)

26%

39%

(60%)

9%

9%

14%

9%

36,758

16,048

20,710

0.71

0.79

13,587

274

271

386

323

57

172

45%

106

91

15

1,188

734

1,105

1,162

a.   Barrick owns 50% of Veladero with our joint venture partner, Shandong Gold, owning the remaining 50%. Veladero is proportionately consolidated on the 
basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities relating to the arrangement. The figures 
presented in this table and the discussion that follows are based on our 50% interest in Veladero inclusive of the impact of remeasurement of our interest in 
Veladero following the disposal of a 50% interest on June 30, 2017.

b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment
There were no LTIs recorded at Veladero during the fourth quarter 
of  2021,  which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  0.00  per  million  hours 
worked, consistent with the prior quarter. The TRIFR8 for the fourth 
quarter  of  2021  was  0.00  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to 
0.64 in the prior quarter. 

There  were  three  LTIs  recorded  in  2021,  which  resulted  in  an 
LTIFR8 of 0.28 per million hours worked compared to 0.31 in 2020. 
The TRIFR8 for 2021 was 0.48 per million hours worked, compared 
to  0.72  in  the  prior  year.  No  Class  19  environmental  incidents 
occurred during 2021 or 2020. 

Minera  Andina  del  Sol  SRL,  the  joint  venture  company  that 
operates  the  Veladero  mine,  is  the  subject  of  various  regulatory 
proceedings  related  to  operational  incidents  occurring  in  March 
2017,  September  2016  and  September  2015.  Refer  to  note  35  to 
the Financial Statements for more information regarding these and 
related matters.

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Veladero’s  income  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  79%  higher 
than the third quarter of 2021, primarily due to higher sales volume, 
lower cost of sales per ounce7 and a higher realized gold price6.

Gold  production  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was  27%  higher 
than  the  prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  an  increase  in  recoverable 
ounces placed, combined with a successful strategy of processing 
material  simultaneously  from  both  Phases  1  to  5  and  the  recently 
commissioned  Phase  6  leach  pad.  Gold  sales  were  higher  than 
production in the fourth quarter of 2021 due to the sale of a portion 
of  built-up  gold  inventory  as  we  continue  to  manage  the  timing  of 
our sales to minimize our exposure to local currency devaluation.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in 
the fourth quarter of 2021 decreased by 3% and 5%, respectively, 
mainly due to the impact of higher sales volumes, partially offset by 
higher open pit mining and processing costs driven by maintenance 
and  higher  consumable  prices.  In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  
all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  was  29%  lower  than  the  
prior  quarter,  primarily  attributable  to  lower  minesite  sustaining 
capital  expenditures6,  combined  with  lower  total  cash  costs  
per ounce6. 

Capital expenditures in the fourth quarter of 2021 decreased by 
3% compared to the prior quarter due to lower minesite sustaining 
capital  expenditures6  related  to  lower  capitalized  stripping  and 
drilling.  This  was  partially  offset  by  increased  project  capital 
expenditures6 reflecting the commencement of construction for the 
Phase 7A leach pad after the winter season.

088

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis2021 compared to 2020
Veladero’s  income  for  2021  was  4%  higher  than  the  prior  year, 
primarily  due  to  a  higher  realized  gold  price6  and  higher  sales 
volume, partially offset by higher cost of sales per ounce7. 

INCOME AND EBITDA6

1,770

1,799

250

125

0

1,393
1,268

172

57

183

203

114

118

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

In  2021,  gold  production  decreased  by  24%  compared  to  the 
prior  year,  primarily  due  to  the  construction  and  commissioning  of  
the  Phase  6  leach  pad.  As  previously  disclosed,  heap  leach 
processing  operations  at  Veladero  were  reduced  through  the  first 
half of 2021, while the mine transitioned to Phase 6. The Phase 6 
leach pad expansion was successfully commissioned in the second 
quarter of 2021, in line with guidance. Gold sales were higher than 
production as we actively managed the timing of sales to minimize 
our exposure to local currency devaluation and support the payment 
of a $20 million dividend to the Veladero joint venture partners.

PRODUCTION 
(thousands of ounces)

300

150

0

226

172

220
to
240

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

In 2021, cost of sales per ounce7 and total cash costs per ounce6 
both  increased  by  9%  compared  to  the  prior  year  period  due  to 
higher open pit costs driven by increased mining activity, combined 
with higher G&A expenditure related to Covid-19. Cost of sales per 
ounce7 was further impacted by higher depreciation expense. All-in 
sustaining costs per ounce6 in 2021 increased by 14% compared to 
the prior year, primarily due to the impact of higher total cash costs 
per ounce6 and higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures6.

COST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6 
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

1,308

1,151

748

1,493

1,256

816

1,210
to
1,290

1,270
to
1,350

740
to
800

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

In  2021,  capital  expenditures  increased  by  26%  compared  to  the 
prior  year,  mainly  due  to  higher  sustaining  capital  expenditures6 
resulting from the development of the Phase 6 leach pad expansion 
and higher capitalized stripping. Project capital expenditures were 
lower  compared  to  the  prior  year,  mainly  due  to  a  $15  million 
payment  made  for  the  funding  of  a  power  transmission  line  in 
Argentina following an agreement made with the Provincial Power 
Regulatory Body of San Juan (“EPRE”) that occurred in the same 
prior year period. 

2021 compared to Guidance
Gold  production  in  2021  of  172  thousand  ounces  was  above  the 
guidance  range  of  130  to  150  thousand  ounces  due  to  stronger 
performance  from  the  additional  stacking  capacity  of  Phase  6,  as 
well as the simultaneous processing of Phases 1 to 5 together with 
Phase 6. All cost metrics were below the guidance ranges. Cost of 
sales  per  ounce7  was  $1,256  compared  to  the  guidance  range  of 
$1,510  to  $1,560  per  ounce  due  to  lower  depreciation. Total  cash 
costs per ounce6 and all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 were $816 
and $1,493, respectively, compared to the guidance ranges of $820 
to  $870  per  ounce  and  $1,720  to  $1,770  per  ounce,  respectively. 
Lower total cash costs per ounce6 was driven by higher production. 
All-in sustaining costs per ounce6 was lower than guidance due to 
lower total cash costs per ounce6, lower capitalized stripping, and 
the postponement of truck purchases to 2023.

the  Argentine  government 

Regulatory matters
On  September  1,  2019, 
issued 
Decree  609/2019  announcing  currency  restrictions  in  Argentina. 
Subsequently, the Central Bank of Argentina issued Communication 
“A” 6770 complementing this decree. As a result, all export proceeds 
are  required  to  be  converted  into  Argentine  pesos.  Dividend 
distributions and payments to foreign suppliers now require specific 
authorizations  from  the  Central  Bank.  These  currency  restrictions 
have  had  limited  impact  on  mining  operations  to  date  but  we 
continue  to  optimize  the  timing  of  our  gold  sales  to  minimize  our 
exposure to currency devaluation. During the fourth quarter of 2021, 
a  dividend  of  $20  million  was  paid  to  the  Veladero  joint  venture 
partners, in addition to a $17 million loan interest payment. Ongoing 
constructive discussions are still being held with the Central Bank 
on our rights to repatriate further profits.

Separately,  on  October  2,  2020,  the  Argentine  government 
issued Decree 785/2020 that established the rate for mining export 
duties  at  8%.  On  December  31,  2021,  this  decree  was  extended 
until December 31, 2023.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 089

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisNORTH MARA (84% basis)a, TANZANIA

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

Total tonnes mined (000s)

Open pit ore

Open pit waste 

Underground

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Open pit mined

Underground mined

Processed

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

Recovery rate

Gold produced (000s oz)

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

661

116

160

385

1.63

6.89

3.57

690

90%

69

70

126

59

68

80

63%

32

23

9

858

679

1,033

1,150

340

n/a

n/a

340

n/a

6.29

3.25

658

91%

66

65

116

64

52

64

55%

18

11

7

993

796

985

1,105

94%

n/a

n/a

13%

n/a

10%

10%

5%

(1%)

5%

8%

9%

(8%)

31%

25%

15%

78%

109%

29%

(14%)

(15%)

5%

4%

1,603

116

160

1,327

1.63

5.58

3.30

2,703

90%

260

257

463

248

214

261

56%

79

52

27

966

777

1,001

1,105

3,758

1,484

1,197

1,077

2.14

6.19

3.45

2,546

92%

261

269

480

267

214

290

60%

87

57

30

992

702

929

1,039

(57%)

(92%)

(87%)

23%

(24%)

(10%)

(4%)

6%

(2%)

0%

(4%)

(4%)

(7%)

0%

(10%)

(7%)

(9%)

(9%)

(10%)

(3%)

11%

8%

6%

12/31/19

10,388

3,987

5,532

869

2.03

6.82

4.50

1,829

94%

251

248

350

236

112

187

53%

42

36

6

953

646

802

824

a.   Formerly part of Acacia Mining plc. On September 17, 2019, Barrick acquired all of the shares of Acacia it did not already own. The results presented are on 
a 63.9% basis until September 30, 2019 (notwithstanding the completion of the Acacia transaction on September 17, 2019, we consolidated our interest in 
Acacia and recorded a non-controlling interest of 36.1% in the income statement for the entirety of the third quarter of 2019 as a matter of convenience); on 
a 100% basis from October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019; and on a 84% basis starting January 1, 2020, the date the GoT’s 16% free carried interest was 
made effective. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are based on our share. 

b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment
There  were  no  LTIs  recorded  at  North  Mara  during  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021,  which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  0.00  per  million 
hours worked, consistent with the prior quarter. The TRIFR8 for the 
fourth quarter of 2021 was 1.04 per million hours worked, compared 
to 0.00 in the prior quarter. 

There  was  one  LTI  recorded  in  2021,  resulting  in  an  LTIFR8 
of  0.13  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to  0.28  in  2020.  The 
TRIFR8  for  2021  was  0.90  per  million  hours  worked,  compared  to 
1.96 in the prior year. No Class 19 environmental incidents occurred 
during 2021 or 2020. 

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
North Mara’s income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 31% higher 
than the third quarter of 2021, mainly due to higher sales volumes, 
lower cost of sales per ounce7 and a higher realized gold price6.

In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  gold  production  was  5%  higher 
than  the  prior  quarter,  mainly  due  to  improved  plant  throughput 
combined  with  higher  grade  and  tonnes  from  the  underground. 
Open-pit mining resumed in the fourth quarter of 2021 for the first 
time since the second quarter of 2020. The Rama pit is expected to 
be commissioned in the first quarter of 2022. Fleet replacement and 
an improvement in underground efficiency in 2021 has resulted in a 
record year for underground tonnes mined. 

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in 
the fourth quarter of 2021 were 14% and 15% lower, respectively, 
than the prior quarter, primarily due to the successful transition to 
grid power from diesel in the underground. This was combined with 
improved  underground  ore  delivery,  at  a  higher  grade,  after  the 
delivery  of  new  fleet  purchased  in  prior  quarters. All-in  sustaining 
costs per ounce6 in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 5% higher than 
the  prior  quarter  as  a  result  of  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital 
expenditures6, partially offset by lower total cash costs per ounce6. 
Capital  expenditures  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  78% 
higher  than  the  third  quarter  of  2021,  driven  by  higher  minesite 
sustaining  capital  expenditures6  as  well  as  higher  project  capital 
expenditures6 predominantly relating to the initial capital spend on 
the  restart  of  the  open-pit  mine,  procurement  of  key  underground 
equipment  in  line  with  our  automation  and  optimization  plan,  and 
completion of the brine treatment facility. 

2021 compared to 2020
North  Mara’s  income  for  2021  was  in  line  with  the  prior  year  as 
lower sales volume was offset by a higher realized gold price6 and 
lower cost of sales per ounce7. 

090

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis1,770

1,799

290

261

214

214

INCOME AND EBITDA6,a

300

200

1,393
1,268

187

100

112

0

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Gold Market Price ($/oz)

a.   The  results  are  presented  on  a  63.9%  basis  from  January  1,  2019  to 
September 30, 2019, on a 100% basis from October 1, 2019 to December 
31, 2019 and on a 84% basis starting January 1, 2020, the date the GoT’s 
16% free carried interest was made effective.

In  2021,  gold  production  was  largely  in  line  with  the  prior  year  as 
higher throughput was offset by lower grades processed. Both mill 
throughput and underground tonnes mined reached annual records 
in 2021. 

PRODUCTION 
(thousands of ounces)

300

150

0

261

260

230
to
260

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Cost of sales per ounce7 in 2021 was 3% lower than the prior year, 
due  to  lower  depreciation  following  the  temporary  cessation  of 
open-pit  mining  in  2020,  partially  offset  by  higher  total  cash  costs 
per ounce6. The increase in total cash costs per ounce6 of 11% was 
mainly  due  to  increased  royalty  expense  due  to  a  higher  realized 
gold  price6,  combined  with  higher  operating  costs  related  to  the 
water  treatment  plant.  All-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  was  8% 
higher than the prior year, primarily due to higher total cash costs 
per  ounce6,  partially  offset  by  a  decrease  in  minesite  sustaining 
capital expenditures6.

COST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6  
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

929

702

1,001

966

777

820
to
900

930
to
1,010

670
to
730

1,000

992

800

600

400

200

0

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a. Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

In  2021,  capital  expenditures  decreased  by  9%  compared  to  the 
prior year, driven by lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures6 
as  well  as  lower  project  capital  expenditures6,  mainly  due  to 
investments in the prior year related to the tailings storage facility 
and other water management initiatives. 

2021 compared to Guidance
Gold production in 2021 of 260 thousand ounces was in the upper 
end of the guidance range of 240 to 270 thousand ounces. Cost of 
sales  per  ounce7  of  $966  was  slightly  below  the  guidance  range 
of $970 to $1,020 per ounce. Total cash costs per ounce6 and and 
all-in sustaining costs per ounce6 of $777 and $1,001, respectively, 
were  both  within  the  guidance  ranges  of  $740  to  $790  per  ounce 
and $960 to $1,100 per ounce, respectively.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 091

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisBULYANHULU (84% basis)a, TANZANIA

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

Change

12/31/21

12/31/20

 Change

12/31/19

Underground tonnes mined (000s)

Average grade (grams/tonne)

Underground mined

Processed

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

Recovery rate

Gold produced (000s oz)

Gold sold (000s oz)

Revenue ($ millions)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

Income ($ millions)
EBITDA ($ millions)b
EBITDA marginc
Capital expenditures ($ millions)

Minesite sustainingb
Projectb

Cost of sales ($/oz)
Total cash costs ($/oz)b
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b
All-in costs ($/oz)b

243

8.86

8.18

234

93%

57

53

101

50

51

65

64%

31

17

14

956

567

897

1,159

198

23%

9.91

9.82

179

94%

53

49

91

53

37

50

55%

10

5

5

1,073

724

827

937

(11%)

(17%)

31%

(1%)

8%

8%

11%

(6%)

38%

30%

16%

210%

240%

180%

(11%)

(22%)

8%

24%

730

9.23

8.95

661

93%

178

166

303

179

122

170

56%

70

29

41

1,079

709

891

1,138

83

780%

n/a

8.81

1.35

1,618

62%

44

103

202

154

27

87

43%

64

6

58

1,499

832

895

1,459

5%

563%

(59%)

50%

304%

61%

50%

16%

352%

95%

30%

9%

383%

(29%)

(28%)

(15%)

0%

(22%)

n/a

1.09

1,531

50%

27

27

39

33

(14)

0

0%

5

2

3

1,207

676

773

850

a.   Formerly part of Acacia Mining plc. On September 17, 2019, Barrick acquired all of the shares of Acacia it did not already own. The results presented are on 
a 63.9% basis until September 30, 2019 (notwithstanding the completion of the Acacia transaction on September 17, 2019, we consolidated our interest in 
Acacia and recorded a non-controlling interest of 36.1% in the income statement for the entirety of the third quarter of 2019 as a matter of convenience); on 
a 100% basis from October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019; and on a 84% basis starting January 1, 2020, the date the GoT’s 16% free carried interest was 
made effective. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are based on our share. 

b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment
There  were  two  LTIs  recorded  at  Bulyanhulu  during  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021,  which  resulted  in  an  LTIFR8  of  1.34  per  million 
hours worked, versus 1.40 in the prior quarter. The TRIFR8 for the 
fourth quarter of 2021 was 2.69 per million hours worked, compared 
to 4.88 in the prior quarter. 

There  were  four  LTIs  recorded  at  Bulyanhulu  in  2021,  which 
resulted in an LTIFR8 of 0.72 per million hours worked versus 0.32 
in  2020. The TRIFR8  for  2021  was  2.90  per  million  hours  worked, 
compared  to  2.30  in  the  prior  year.  No  Class  19  environmental 
incidents occurred during 2021 or 2020. 

Financial Results
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Bulyanhulu’s income for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 38% higher 
than the third quarter of 2021, mainly due to higher sales volumes 
and lower cost of sales per ounce7 following the successful ramp-
up  of  the  underground  operation  into  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021, 
combined with a higher realized gold price6.

In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  gold  production  was  8%  higher 
than  the  prior  quarter. This  increase  was  driven  by  the  successful 
ramp-up  of  the  underground  operation,  which  achieved  steady-
state production during the quarter. 

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in  
the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  11%  and  22%  lower,  respectively, 
than the prior quarter mainly due to the impact of higher production. 
All-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021 
was  8%  higher  than  the  prior  quarter,  mainly  as  a  result  of  higher 
minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures6,  partially  offset  by  lower 
total cash costs per ounce6. 

Capital  expenditures  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  210% 
higher than the third quarter of 2021, mainly due to increased minesite 
sustaining  capital  expenditures6  related  to  the  replacement  of  the 
underground  mobile  fleet.  This  was  combined  with  higher  project 
capital  expenditures6  relating  to  the  process  plant  optimization, 
capitalized drilling and life of mine design improvements identified 
during the underground re-start project. 

2021 compared to 2020
Bulyanhulu’s  income  for  2021  was  352%  higher  than  the  prior 
year,  primarily  due  to  higher  sales  volumes  related  to  the  ramp-
up of underground mining and processing operations, as described 
above. This was combined with lower cost of sales per ounce7 and 
a higher realized gold price6. 

092

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisCOST OF SALES7, TOTAL CASH COSTS6  
AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS6 ($ per ounce)

1,600

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

1,499

895

832

1,079

891

709

950
to
1,030

850
to
930

630
to
690

2020

2021

2022 (est)a

Cost of Sales

Total Cash Costs

AISC

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

In 2021, capital expenditures increased by 9% compared to the prior 
year,  driven  by  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures6 
mainly from the replacement of the underground mobile fleet as well 
as capitalized drilling of the underground. This was partially offset 
by  lower  project  capital  expenditures6  as  the  mine  transitioned  to 
steady state.

2021 compared to Guidance
Gold  production  in  2021  of  178  thousand  ounces  was  within  the 
guidance  range  of  170  to  200  thousand  ounces.  Cost  of  sales 
per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  of  $1,079  and  $709, 
respectively,  were  higher  than  the  guidance  ranges  of  $980  to 
$1,030 per ounce and $580 to $630 per ounce, respectively. All-in  
sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  of  $891  was  also  higher  than  the 
guidance  range  of  $810  to  $860  per  ounce. All  cost  metrics  were 
higher  than  the  guidance  ranges  due  to  higher  than  expected 
dilution,  additional  drilling  to  improve  grade  control  reconciliation, 
and  the  timing  of  concentrate  sales  resulting  in  lower  copper  
by-product credits. 

INCOME AND EBITDA6,a

150

100

50

0

-50

1,393
1,268

0

-14

1,799

170

122

1,770

87

27

1,800

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

2019

2020

2021

Income ($ millions)

EBITDA ($ millions)

Market Gold Price ($/oz)

a.   The  results  are  presented  on  a  63.9%  basis  from  January  1,  2019  to 
September 30, 2019, on a 100% basis from October 1, 2019 to December 31,  
2019 and on a 84% basis starting January 1, 2020, the date the GoT’s 16% 
free carried interest was made effective.

In  2021,  gold  production  was  304%  higher  than  the  prior  year, 
primarily due to the ramp-up of underground mining and processing 
following the restart of underground mining operations at the end of 
the third quarter of 2020. For most of the prior year, Bulyanhulu was 
a tailings re-treatment operation.

PRODUCTION 
(thousands of ounces)

200

100

0

27

2019

44

2020

170
to
200

2021 (est)

a.  Based on the midpoint of the guidance range.

Cost  of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in  2021 
were 28% and 15% lower, respectively, than the prior year, mainly 
due to the impact of higher gold production following the successful 
ramp-up  of  underground  mining  and  processing  in  2021.  All-in 
sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  was  in  line  with  the  prior  year  due  to 
lower total cash costs per ounce6, largely offset by higher minesite 
sustaining capital expenditures6.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 093

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisOTHER MINES – GOLD

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

For the three months ended

12/31/21

Total
cash
costs
($/oz)a

All-in
sustaining
costs
($/oz)a

1,205

1,481

1,301

1,938

Cost of
sales
($/oz)

1,494

1,770

–

–

–

Gold 
produced
(000s oz)

50

35

–

Capital
Expend-
ituresb

Gold
produced
(000s oz) 

Cost of
sales
($/oz)

2

15

–

41

26

4
–

1,579

1,870

1,000
–

9/30/21
Total
cash
costs
($/oz)a

1,139

1,493

967
–

All-in
sustaining
costs
($/oz)a

Capital
Expend-
ituresb

1,329

2,276

970
–

7

20

0
–

Tongon (89.7%)

Hemlo
Buzwagic (84%)
Porgerad (47.5%)

a.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
b.  Includes both minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures.
c.   With the end of mining at Buzwagi in the third quarter of 2021, as previously reported, we have ceased to include production or non-GAAP cost metrics for 

Buzwagi from October 1, 2021 onwards. 

d.  As Porgera has been on care and maintenance since April 25, 2020, no operating data or per ounce data is provided. 

Tongon (89.7% basis), Côte d’Ivoire
Gold production for Tongon in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 22% 
higher  than  the  prior  quarter,  reflecting  higher  grades  processed, 
throughput  and  recoveries. As  previously  disclosed,  production  in 
the  third  quarter  of  2021  was  impacted  by  a  heavy  rainy  season. 
Cost of sales per ounce7 in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 5% lower 
than the prior quarter due to lower depreciation, partially offset by 
higher total cash costs per ounce6. Total cash costs per ounce6 were 
6% higher than the prior quarter, primarily due to higher mill power 
consumption reflecting increased throughput. All-in sustaining costs 
per ounce6 in the fourth quarter of 2021 were lower than the prior 
quarter,  due  to  lower  minesite  sustaining  capital  expenditures6, 
partially offset by the increase in total cash costs per ounce6.

Gold production in 2021 of 187 thousand ounces was within the 
guidance range of 180 to 200 thousand ounces. Cost of sales per 
ounce7 of $1,504 was also within the guidance range of $1,470 to 
$1,520 per ounce. Total cash costs per ounce6 and all-in sustaining 
costs  per  ounce6  of  $1,093  and  $1,208,  respectively,  were  both 
above  the  guidance  ranges  of  $1,000  to  $1,050  per  ounce  and 
$1,140  to  $1,190  per  ounce,  respectively,  driven  by  increased 
material mined and processed with lower grade and recoveries.

Hemlo, Ontario, Canada
Hemlo’s gold production in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 35% higher 
than  the  prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  higher  grades  and  higher 
ore tonnes mined due to improved underground performance. Cost 
of  sales  per  ounce7  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  in  the  fourth 
quarter of 2021 were 5% and 1% lower, respectively, than the prior 
quarter due to the impact of higher sales volumes. All-in sustaining 
costs per ounce6 decreased by 15% compared to the prior quarter, 
primarily due to lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures6 and 
lower total cash costs per ounce6. 

As expected and previously disclosed, gold production in 2021 
of 150 thousand ounces was below the guidance range of 200 to 220 
thousand ounces, which was due to lower underground productivity 
impacted by Covid-19 movement restrictions that slowed the ramp-
up of underground development, temporary seismicity issues, and 
a  mine  shutdown  following  the  tragic  fatality  in  July  2021  of  an 
employee  from  our  underground  mining  contractor.  Cost  of  sales 
per  ounce7  of  $1,693  and  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  of  $1,388 
were  both  above  the  guidance  ranges  of  $1,200  to  $1,250  per 
ounce and $950 to $1,000 per ounce, respectively. All-in sustaining 
costs  per  ounce6  of  $1,970  was  also  higher  than  the  guidance 
range of $1,280 to $1,330 per ounce. As expected and previously 
disclosed, per ounce cost metrics in 2021 were above guidance due 
to  a  significant  increase  in  royalty  expense  from  a  higher  realized 
gold price6 and mining in specific underground zones that incurred 
a higher net profit interest royalty burden. Costs were also impacted 
by lower production volumes as described above. 

Porgera (47.5% basis), Papua New Guinea
On April 9, 2021, BNL signed a binding Framework Agreement with 
PNG and Kumul Minerals, a state-owned mining company, setting 
out the terms and conditions for the reopening of the Porgera mine. 
On February 3, 2022, the Framework Agreement was replaced by 
the  Commencement  Agreement.  The  Commencement  Agreement 
was signed by PNG, Kumul Minerals, BNL and its affiliate Porgera 
(Jersey)  Limited  on  October  15,  2021,  and  it  became  effective  on 
February 3, 2022, following signature by Mineral Resources Enga 
Limited  (“MRE”),  the  holder  of  the  remaining  5%  of  the  original 
Porgera  joint  venture.  The  Commencement  Agreement  reflects 
the  commercial  terms  previously  agreed  to  under  the  Framework 
Agreement, namely that PNG stakeholders will receive a 51% equity 
stake  in  the  Porgera  mine,  with  the  remaining  49%  to  be  held  by 
BNL or an affiliate. BNL is jointly owned on a 50/50 basis by Barrick 
and Zijin Mining Group. Accordingly, following the implementation of 
the Commencement Agreement, Barrick’s current 47.5% interest in 
the Porgera mine is expected to be reduced to a 24.5% interest as 
reflected  in  Barrick’s  reserve  and  resource  estimates  for  Porgera. 
BNL  will  retain  operatorship  of  the  mine.  The  Commencement 
Agreement  also  provides  that  PNG  stakeholders  and  BNL  and  its 
affiliates will share the economic benefits derived from the reopened 
Porgera  Mine  on  a  53%  and  47%  basis  over  the  remaining  life  of 
mine, respectively, and that the Government of PNG will retain the 
option to acquire BNL’s or its affiliate’s 49% equity participation at 
fair market value after 10 years.

The  provisions  of  the  Commencement  Agreement  will  be 
implemented,  and  work  to  recommence  full  mine  operations  at 
Porgera will begin, following the execution of a number of definitive 
agreements  and  satisfaction  of  a  number  of  conditions.  These 
include  a  Shareholders  Agreement  among  the  shareholders  of  a 
new  Porgera  joint  venture  company,  an  Operatorship  Agreement 
pursuant  to  which  BNL  will  operate  the  Porgera  mine,  as  well  as 
a  Mine  Development  Contract  to  accompany  the  new  SML  that 
the  new  Porgera  joint  venture  company  will  apply  for  following  its 
incorporation. Under the terms of the Commencement Agreement, 
BNL will remain in possession of the site and maintain the mine on 
care and maintenance.

Porgera  was  excluded  from  our  2021  guidance  and  will 
also  be  excluded  from  our  2022  guidance.  We  expect  to  update 
our  guidance  following  both  the  execution  of  all  of  the  definitive 
agreements  to  implement  the  binding  Commencement Agreement 
and  the  finalization  of  a  timeline  for  the  resumption  of  full  mine 
operations.  Refer  to  notes  21  and  35  to  the  Financial  Statements 
for more information.

094

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
OTHER MINES – COPPER

SUMMARY OF OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

Copper 
production
(millions of
pounds)

78

27

21

12/31/21

Cost of
sales
($/lb)

C1 cash
costs
($/lb)a

2.16

3.14

1.36

1.54

2.35

1.11

For the three months ended

9/30/21

All-in
sustaining
costs
($/lb)a

Capital
Expend-
ituresb

Copper
production
(millions of
pounds)

3.29

3.42

1.27

79

35

3

57

24

19

Cost of
sales
($/lb)

2.54

3.13

1.51

C1 cash
costs
($/lb)a
1.76

2.33

1.35

All-in
sustaining
costs
($/lb)a
2.68

2.77

1.55

Capital
Expend-
ituresb
30

21

2

Lumwana

Zaldívar (50%)

Jabal Sayid (50%)

a. Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
b. Includes both minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. 

Lumwana, Zambia
Copper  production  for  Lumwana  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021 
was  37%  higher  compared  to  the  prior  quarter,  resulting  from 
higher  grades  processed,  improved  recovery  and  a  significant 
improvement  in  throughput  driven  by  higher  mill  availability.  Cost 
of  sales  per  pound7  and  C1  cash  costs  per  pound6  in  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021  were  15%  and  13%  lower,  respectively,  than  the 
prior  quarter  primarily  due  to  higher  capitalized  stripping,  partially 
offset by higher mining costs. Cost of sales per pound7 was further 
impacted  by  lower  depreciation  expense.  In  the  fourth  quarter  of 
2021, all-in sustaining costs per pound6 increased by 23% compared 
to  the  prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  higher  minesite  sustaining 
capital expenditures6 mainly related to new mining equipment and 
stripping, partially offset by lower C1 cash costs per pound6.

Copper  production  in  2021  of  242  million  pounds  was  below  
the  guidance  range  of  250  to  280  million  pounds,  mainly  due  to 
lower mill and equipment availability. A new fleet was commissioned 
in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  which  improved  availability  and  was 
a  key  driver  in  the  significant  increase  in  production  quarter-on-
quarter. Cost of sales per pound7 of $2.25 was above the guidance 
range of $1.85 to $2.05 per pound, while C1 cash costs per pound6 
of  $1.62  was  within  the  guidance  range  of  $1.45  to  $1.65.  All-in 
sustaining  costs6  of  $2.80  per  pound  were  above  the  guidance 
range of $2.25 to $2.45 per pound, due to the timing of shipments. 
Higher  cost  metrics  are  mainly  attributed  to  a  higher  realized 
copper price6, which resulted in a higher royalty expense, whereas 
the guidance ranges were based on a copper price of $2.75/lb as 
previously disclosed. 

Zaldívar (50% basis), Chile
Copper  production  for  Zaldívar  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was 
13%  higher  than  the  prior  quarter,  mainly  due  to  higher  grades 
processed. Cost of sales per pound7 and C1 cash costs per pound6 
in the fourth quarter of 2021 were in line with the prior quarter. All-
in sustaining costs per pound6 increased by 23% compared to the 
prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  higher  minesite  sustaining  capital 
expenditures6 that were previously deferred as a result of Covid-19 
movement restrictions earlier in the year.

Copper  production  in  2021  of  97  million  pounds  was  within 
the  guidance  range  of  90  to  110  million  pounds.  Cost  metrics  per 
pound were above the guidance ranges mainly due to cost overruns 
relating to site maintenance. Cost of sales per pound7 for 2021 was 
$3.19 compared to guidance of $2.30 to $2.50 per pound. C1 cash 
costs  per  pound6  was  $2.38  compared  to  guidance  of  $1.65  to 
$1.85 per pound, and all-in sustaining costs per pound6 was $2.94 
compared to guidance of $1.90 to $2.10 per pound. 

Jabal Sayid (50% basis), Saudi Arabia
Jabal Sayid’s copper production in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 
11% higher compared to the prior quarter, mainly due to increased 
throughput. Cost of sales per pound7 and C1 cash costs per pound6 
in the fourth quarter of 2021 were 10% and 18% lower, respectively, 
than  the  prior  quarter  mainly  due  to  the  impact  of  higher  sales 
volume. All-in  sustaining  costs  per  pound6  in  the  fourth  quarter  of 
2021 decreased by 18% when compared to the prior quarter, mainly 
due to the lower C1 cash costs per pound6, with minesite sustaining 
capital expenditures6 remaining consistent with the prior quarter.

Copper  production  in  2021  of  76  million  pounds  was  near  the 
midpoint of the guidance range of 70 to 80 million pounds, with the 
mine exceeding expectations on grade and the mill delivering across 
all quarters. Cost of sales per pound7 for 2021 was $1.38, finishing 
below  the  guidance  range  of  $1.40  to  $1.60  per  pound.  C1  cash 
costs per pound6 were $1.18, which was within the guidance range 
of $1.10 to $1.30 per pound. All-in sustaining costs per pound6 were 
$1.33, also within guidance of $1.30 to $1.50 per pound. 

GROWTH PROJECT UPDATES 
Goldrush Project, Nevada, USA 
Since the conclusion of the public scoping period in September 2021, 
the  Bureau  of  Land  Management’s  (“BLM”)  Environmental  Impact 
Statement (“EIS”) contractor (Stantec) has completed the Draft EIS 
(“DEIS”)  documents. The  draft  documents  will  be  reviewed  by  the 
local,  state,  and  federal  BLM  offices  before  being  made  available 
for public review and comment. We expect the public review period 
for  the  DEIS  to  begin  in  the  first  quarter  of  2022,  and  it  will  last 
for 45 days. Public meetings will be held to gather comments and 
answer  questions  from  the  public.  Comments  gathered  during 
the  public  review  of  the  DEIS  will  then  be  addressed  in  the  Final 
EIS  (“FEIS”)  documents.  We  continue  to  expect  the  issuance  of 
a Record of Decision (“ROD”) in the second half of 2022, which is 
reflected in the current mine plan.

As  the  permitting  process  progresses,  mine  development  has 
continued  in  the  Red  Hill  mining  zone  at  Goldrush.  Development 
is  currently  focused  on  the  upper  portions  of  Red  Hill,  where 
dewatering  of  the  ore  body  is  not  required. Additionally,  the  Multi-
Purpose Drift (“MPD”) continues to be developed to the north over 
the top of the orebody. The MPD will serve as a platform for continued 
underground  exploration  drilling  of  the  Red  Hill  and  Crow  mining 
zones. Test mining of underground longhole stopes commenced in 
November 2021. Test stoping will allow for the validation of mining 
rock mass conditions and increase the amount of ore available for 
bulk metallurgical testing through the Carlin roasters.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 095

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
Capital  purchases  of  mobile  mining  equipment  continued  in 
the fourth quarter of 2021. Assembly has begun on a modular dry 
facility just outside of the existing office/shop facility near the Cortez 
Hills Open Pit. Engineering work is progressing on Ventilation Raise 
#1  (“VR1”),  the  materials  handling  system,  and  the  underground 
backfill system. The drilling of test wells for the first three dewatering 
wells is currently expected to begin in the third quarter of 2022.

The  headcount  ramp-up  at  Goldrush  also  continues,  with  127 
NGM  employees  on-site  at  year-end.  Headcount  is  planned  to 
increase to 233 over the course of 2022. 

As  at  December  31,  2021,  we  have  spent  $290  million  on  a 
100%  basis  (including  $26  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021) 
on  the  Goldrush  project,  inclusive  of  the  exploration  declines. 
This  capital  spent  to  date,  together  with  the  remaining  expected  
pre-production  capital  (until  commercial  production  begins  in  
2025),  is  anticipated  to  be  slightly  less  than  the  $1  billion  initial 
capital  estimate  previously  disclosed  for  the  Goldrush  project  (on 
a 100% basis). 

Turquoise Ridge Third Shaft, Nevada, USA14
Construction  of  the  Third  Shaft  at  Turquoise  Ridge,  which  has  
a  hoisting  capacity  of  5,500 
to  
advance  according  to  schedule  and  within  budget.  We  continue 
to  expect  commissioning  in  late  2022.  Together  with  increased 
hoisting capacity, the Third Shaft is expected to provide additional 
ventilation  for  underground  mining  operations  as  well  as  shorter 
haulage distances. 

tonnes  per  day,  continues 

Construction activities continued in the fourth quarter of 2021, 
focusing on shaft steel installation. At the end of the quarter, shaft 
steel  equipping  reached  28%  completion  as  measured  by  steel 
weight. Furthermore, commissioning of the concrete/shotcrete slick 
line  was  successfully  completed,  construction  on  the  2280  level 
materials handling system restarted and surface construction of the 
additional  main  exhaust  fan  at  the  No. 1  Shaft  began.  Permanent 
conveyance deliveries have started and a contract is now in place for 
the construction of the change house facility, which will commence 
in 2022. The focus of the project will remain on shaft equipping for 
the first quarter of 2022, followed by final headframe refit.

As at December 31, 2021, we have spent $222 million (including 
$7 million in the fourth quarter of 2021) out of an estimated capital 
cost of approximately $300–$330 million (100% basis). 

Pueblo Viejo Expansion, Dominican Republic15
life  extension  
The  Pueblo  Viejo  plant  expansion  and  mine 
project  is  designed  to  increase  throughput  to  14  million  tonnes 
per  annum,  allowing  the  operation  to  maintain  minimum  average  
annual gold production of approximately 800,000 ounces after 2022 
(100% basis). 

Engineering design of the plant expansion continued to progress 
during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  and  is  now  essentially  complete 
(from  97%  as  of  the  third  quarter  of  2021).  94%  of  the  contracts 
and  purchase  orders  have  been  placed.  Steel  fabrication  is  now 
complete  and  91%  of  the  manufactured  steel  required  had  been 
shipped at the end of the fourth quarter of 2021.

Construction for the plant expansion is now 26% complete (from 
16%  as  of  the  third  quarter  of  2021).  Earthworks  were  75%  and 
civil  concrete  works  were  60%  complete  at  the  end  of  the  fourth 
quarter of 2021. Steel and mechanical installation has started, and 
will  ramp  up  through  the  first  quarter  of  2022  upon  the  arrival  of 
materials. We expect completion of the plant expansion by the end 
of 2022.

The  social,  environmental,  and  technical  studies  for  additional 
tailings  and  mine  waste  rock  capacity  continued  to  advance, 
including  the  review  of  alternative  sites,  in  consultation  with  the 
government.  Detailed  design  and  engineering  of  these  alternative 
sites is ongoing. We are continuing to engage with local stakeholders 
to review concerns and feedback. 

As  of  December  31,  2021,  we  have  incurred  $450  million 
(including $112 million in the fourth quarter of 2021) on the project. 
As  previously  disclosed,  the  project  has  experienced  logistical 

challenges  and  related  delays  primarily  due  to  the  impact  of  the 
Covid-19  pandemic  on  the  global  supply  chain,  and  consequently 
the  capital  cost  of  the  project  is  now  estimated  at  approximately 
$1.4 billion (100% basis).

Bulyanhulu Re-Start and Optimization
During the fourth quarter of 2021, Bulyanhulu achieved record gold 
production  of  68  thousand  ounces  (100%  basis)  since  resuming 
mining operations, which is higher than the 2022 planned quarterly 
run-rate of 55 to 60 thousand ounces (100% basis). In addition, full 
commissioning  of  the  grinding  and  gravity  circuits  has  now  been 
completed,  enabling  the  plant  to  achieve  steady  throughput  rates 
of  2,500  tonnes  per  day. As  the  construction  phase  of  this  project 
has been completed, it will no longer be separately reported in this 
section of the MD&A.

The  internal  feasibility  study  for  Bulyanhulu  delivered  mineral 
reserve growth of 670 thousand ounces year on year (100% basis), 
net of 2021 depletion, as a direct result of the underground resource 
conversion  drill  program  at  Deep  West.  Accordingly,  the  updated 
mine plan is now expected to deliver an average of 240 thousand 
ounces (100% basis) per annum for the majority of the life of mine, 
in  excess  of  10  years.  Furthermore,  mineral  reserve  conversion 
drilling is planned to convert the lower half of the Deep West panel 
during 2022.

Zaldívar Chloride Leach Project, Chile 
Zaldívar is jointly owned by Antofagasta and Barrick, and is operated 
by  Antofagasta.  In  December  2019,  the  Board  of  Compañía 
Minera Zaldívar approved the Chloride Leach Project. The project 
contemplates  the  construction  of  a  chloride  dosing  system,  an 
upgrade  of  the  solvent  extraction  plant  and  the  construction  of 
additional washing ponds.

During the fourth quarter of 2021, the fourth solvent extraction 
processing  stream  (Train  D)  was  modified  and  recommissioned. 
Capital  is  trending  in  line  with  the  approved  budget.  Construction 
of  the  project  was  substantially  complete  at  the  end  of  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021  and  subsequently  completed  in  January  2022. 
Commissioning is expected in the first quarter of 2022.   

Upon commissioning, the project is expected to increase copper 
recoveries  by  more  than  10%  through  the  addition  of  chlorides  to 
the  leach  solution  and  with  further  potential  upside  in  recoveries 
possible  depending  on  the  type  of  ore  being  processed.  This 
process  is  based  on  a  proprietary  technology  called  CuproChlor® 
that was developed by Antofagasta at its Michilla operation, which 
had ore types similar to those that are processed at Zaldívar. Once 
in  full  operation,  the  project  is  expected  to  increase  production  at 
Zaldívar by approximately 10 to 15 thousand tonnes per annum at 
lower operating costs over the remaining life of mine. 

As at December 31, 2021, we have spent $180 million (including 
$15 million in the fourth quarter of 2021) out of an estimated capital 
cost of approximately $189 million (100% basis).

Veladero Phase 7 Leach Pad, Argentina 
In  November  2021,  the  board  of  Minera Andina  del  Sol  approved 
the Phase 7A leach pad construction project. Construction of Phase 
7B will commence following the completion of Phase 7A subject to 
approval  by  the  Board.  Construction  on  both  phases  will  include 
sub-drainage  and  monitoring,  leak  collection  and  recirculation, 
impermeabilization,  and  pregnant  leaching  solution  collection. 
Additionally, the north channel (non-contacted water management) 
will be extended along the leach pad facility. 

Construction  of  Phase  7A  commenced  in  November  2021. 
Overall  project  progress  was  at  20%  completion  at  the  end  of  the 
fourth  quarter  of  2021,  slightly  ahead  of  schedule.  Completion  is 
expected in mid-2022, in line with the mine plan.

As  at  December  31,  2021,  we  have  spent  $10  million  out  of 
an  estimated  capital  cost  of  $75  million  (100%  basis).  Subject  to 
approval  by  the  board  of  Minera  Andina  del  Sol,  construction  of 
Phase 7B is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2022.

096

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisVeladero Power Transmission, Chile-Argentina 
In 2019, we commenced construction of an extension to the existing 
Pascua-Lama  power  transmission  line  to  connect  to  Veladero. 
Upon  completion,  the  power  transmission  line  will  allow  Veladero 
to  convert  to  grid  power  exported  from  Chile  and  cease  operating 
the current high-cost diesel generation power plant located at site. 
A power purchase price agreement was executed during the fourth 
quarter  of  2019  to  supply  power  from  renewable  energy  that  will 
significantly reduce Veladero’s carbon footprint. This is expected to 
reduce CO2 equivalent emissions by 100,000 tonnes per year upon 
commissioning.

We  have  now  completed  the  construction  of  the  Veladero  
Power  Transmission  project,  which  is  expected  to  be  energized  
in  the  first  half  of  2022,  subject  to  final  authorization.  As  of  
December  31,  2021,  we  have  spent  $52  million  to  complete  the 
project (100% basis).

EXPLORATION AND MINERAL  
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
The  foundation  of  our  exploration  strategy  starts  with  a  deep 
organizational understanding that exploration is an investment and 
a  value  driver  for  the  business  –  not  a  process.  Our  strategy  has 
multiple  elements  that  all  need  to  be  in  balance  to  deliver  on  the 
Company’s business plan for growth and long-term sustainability.

First,  we  seek  to  deliver  projects  of  a  short-  to  medium-term 
nature that will drive improvements in mine plans. Second, we seek 
to make new discoveries that add to Barrick’s Tier One Gold Asset1 
portfolio. Third, we seek to optimize the value of major undeveloped 
projects.  Finally,  we  seek  to  identify  emerging  opportunities  early 
in  their  value  chain  and  secure  them  by  an  earn-in  or  outright 
acquisition, where appropriate.

Our  exploration  approach  is  to  first  understand  the  geological 
framework and ore controls. We then design exploration programs 
based  upon  that  understanding,  instead  of  simply  drilling  for 
mineralized  intervals.  This  has  put  us  in  good  stead  with  robust 
results from multiple projects highlighted in the following section.

North America
Carlin, Nevada, USA16,17
At  North  Leeville,  results  from  the  2021  resource  delineation 
program  have  delivered  a  maiden  inferred  resource  of  1.9  million 
tonnes  at  11.5  g/t  for  0.70  million  ounces  (on  a  100%  basis). The 
bulk  of  high-grade  mineralization  occurs  in  a  200  meter  by  135 
meter  area,  with  significant  growth  opportunity  along  prospective 
northwest  and  north-northeast  structures. Additional  assay  results 
from  hole  NLX-00010  extend  the  previously  reported  42.4  meters 
with  a  further  14.3  meters  of  high-grade  mineralization,  producing 
a final intercept of 56.7 meters at 28.39 g/t Au. A subsequent hole, 
NLX-00012, located approximately 60 meters to the east returned 
two  intercepts  including  4.3  meters  at  8.88  g/t Au  and  7.8  meters 
at 26.03 g/t Au. The results confirm the continuity of mineralization 
along  prominent  low  angle  structural  and  stratigraphic  controls  in 
that direction. Resource delineation drilling will continue into 2022 
to  capture  additional  high-value  ounces,  while  exploration  drilling 
will test down-dip opportunities along interpreted feeder faults. 

Exploration drifting continued from the south, with underground 
drilling  successfully  executing  the  drill  program  planned  to  infill 
the  deposit  along  its  southern  extents.  Overall,  North  Leeville  is 
defined  as  a  1  by  1.2  kilometer  zone  of  stratiform  mineralization, 
primarily  hosted  at  or  near  the  contact  of  the  Devonian  Rodeo 
Creek  and  Popovich  Formations,  with  high-grade  centers  focused 
on northwest and north-northeast structures, defining epicenters of 
high-value ounces within a rough 200 by 250 meter area, currently 
constrained only by drilling and open to the south and northeast. 

Along the Post-Gen fault corridor beneath the southern margin 
of  the  Goldstrike  stock,  a  final  drill  hole  was  completed  at  the  
Dogma  target.  While  the  hole  intersected  favorable  breccia  and 
alteration, the lithology was unfavorable and is expected to return 

only  low-grade  mineralization  through  the  targeted  zone.  Focus 
along the fertile Post fault corridor has moved north of the Goldstrike 
stock, where down-dip extensions of several high-grade ore bodies 
remain open. 

Resource  delineation  drilling  at  REN  was  completed  in  the 
fourth quarter of 2021, with the addition of a metallurgical core hole 
to increase the understanding of recoveries within the JB Zone. On 
a  100%  basis,  this  program  has  delivered  a  maiden  resource  of  
50 thousand ounces in the indicated category (0.11 million tonnes 
at  14.40  g/t  Au)  and  1.2  million  ounces  in  the  inferred  category  
(5.2  million  tonnes  at  7.3  g/t  Au),  and  has  further  expanded 
exploration  upside  potential.  Drilling  completed  in  the  fourth 
quarter  of  2021  targeted  high  upside  potential  areas  outside  the 
newly  defined  resource  footprint  and  highlighted  the  potential  for 
resource  expansion  both  on  the  eastern  side  of  the  drift,  south  of 
the JB Zone (MRC-21015: 16.6 meters at 9.63 g/t Au, ~100m south 
of  existing  underground  drilling)  and,  on  the  western  side  of  the  
drift,  highlighting  the  high-grade  potential  of  the  Corona  Corridor 
(MRC-21001:  40.2  meters  at  27.60  g/t Au  in  the  north  and  MRC-
21011: 16.8 meters at 7.03 g/t Au towards the south). Mineralization 
in  the  west  remains  open  north,  south  and  to  the  west.  While  on 
the east, mineralization remains unconstrained by drilling up to 800 
meters to the south, at East Banshee.

Cortez, Nevada, USA18
At  the  Cortez  Hills  underground  mine,  drill  testing  of  a  fertile  
fault and inferred feeder below the mine referred to as the Hanson 
Footwall  target  was  successful.  To  date,  multiple  intersections  
(16.9  meters  at  11.24  g/t  Au  in  the  third  quarter  of  2021  and  
22.6 meters at 23.07 g/t Au in the fourth quarter of 2021), provide 
encouragement for expansion along strike and down-dip. Follow-up 
step-out drill testing is planned to start in early 2022.

Follow-up  drilling  to  grow  the  deposit  westward  at  the  Distal 
target intersected skarn alteration and quartz-sulfide veins that are 
associated  with  the  previously  encountered  Distal  mineralization. 
Further  to  the  northwest,  field  mapping  and  sampling  highlights 
additional  potential  associated  with  parallel  structures  containing 
strong  alteration,  and  surface  gold  mineralization.  Mapping  and 
sampling is ongoing with drilling planned for 2022 in this new area 
of the deposit.

Further  west  at  Swift,  an  exploration  earn-in  joint  venture  for 
Nevada Gold Mines, geologic mapping in conjunction with soil and 
rock chip sampling was undertaken and has validated and expanded 
the  extents  of  known  surface  anomalies.  Drilling  of  a  framework 
core hole was initiated to assess depth and alteration of favorable 
lower  plate  carbonate  host  rocks  in  an  area  of  sparse  drilling  and 
strong surficial geochemistry.

Fourmile, Nevada, USA
At Fourmile, drilling northwest of the Dorothy breccia at the northern 
extents of known mineralization, returned a narrow interval of high-
grade  mineralization  along  with  a  thick  interval  of  breccia  that 
has  anomalous  pathfinder  geochemistry.  This  anomalous  breccia 
indicates proximity to mineralization and warrants follow-up work to 
vector  to  its  source.  Further  north,  mapping  continues  tracing  the 
northward projection of known fertile faults and the northern margin 
of  the  premineral  Mill  Canyon  stock  where  strong  geochemical 
anomalies  are  focused.  Framework  drilling  commenced  during 
the fourth quarter of 2021, targeting the intersection of anomalous 
structures  identified  from  mapping  to  assess  the  potential  of  this 
frontier area several kilometers north of Fourmile.

Turquoise Ridge, Nevada, USA14
Improvements in the understanding of the Turquoise Ridge district 
geology  continues  to  be  delivered  from  data  mining,  re-logging, 
and  section  work.  Updates  to  the  geologic  model  using  the  new 
interpretations continues to highlight opportunities in the camp and 
multiple targets have been developed.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 097

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisSphinx scout drilling results have all been received, intersecting 
gold  mineralization  and  strong  multi-element  leakage  along  three 
primary structural corridors. Follow-up drilling to test the down-dip 
intersection of these fertile faults with favorable host rocks at depth 
is  in  progress.  Additional  reverse  circulation  (“RC”)  drilling  in  the 
Fence  Line  target,  towards  the  Mega  Pit,  is  planned  to  define  the 
extent  of  a  newly  recognized  area  of  strong  Carlin-type  chemical 
anomalism.  The  program  planned  for  2022  is  significantly  larger 
than in recent years.

Hemlo, Canada
Infill  drilling  is  ramping  up  through  2022  in  the  western  extension 
(E-Zone). The E-Zone consists of fine grain visible gold associated 
with  deformed  quartz-carbonate  veining  and  intense  carbonate 
alteration.  This  varies  from  the  typical  C-Zone  mineralization  to 
the  east,  which  is  mainly  associated  with  strong  feldspathization, 
indicating the E-Zone might be a more distal ore zone to the main 
ore body. A second rig has been added and the E-Zone is on track 
to  add  a  new  mining  area  near  surface,  which  will  be  accessible 
from the 9975 level. 

The  most  significant  reserve  and  resource  material  was  
added in the Lower C-Zone, with continuation of the Lower C-Zone 
high-grade  ore  shoots  defined  approximately  200  meters  below 
current development.

Uchi Belt, Canada
In  the  second  half  of  2021,  Barrick  executed  four  exploration 
earn-in agreements to secure consolidated land packages totaling 
~124,000 hectares of highly prospective and underexplored ground 
in the western Uchi Belt of northern Ontario. The properties cover 
over 130 kilometers of strike along prospective structural corridors 
within  the  belt,  and  are  all  early-stage  greenfield  projects  with 
excellent discovery potential. Each of the option agreements allow 
Barrick  a  clear  path,  through  various  expenditure  and  milestone 
commitments, to earn a minimum 70% interest in the properties. 

On  the  South  Uchi  option  with  Kenorland  Minerals  in  the  east 
of  the  belt,  a  property-wide  till  survey  has  been  completed  and 
partial  results  to  date  have  identified  an  anomalous  gold-arsenic 
train  within  the  eastern  half  of  the  property  package,  coincident 
with the approximately 40 kilometer long arsenic anomaly identified 
from  legacy  lake  sediment  data.  Multiple  barren  grid  lines  to  the 
immediate northeast, in the up-ice flow direction from the anomalous 
area, suggests that the source is proximal. 

A Lidar survey was flown over the three western properties in the 
fourth quarter of 2021, which will be used to map the geomorphology 
to understand the glaciation history ahead of till surveys when the 
weather permits in 2022.

Latin America & Asia Pacific
Pueblo Viejo, Dominican Republic15
Delineation  work  progressed  at  the  Arroyo  del  Rey  target,  where 
mapping  identified  multiple  silica  alteration  events  and  rock 
chip  samples  yielded  mineralization  at  surface,  extending  the 
geochemical  footprint  of  the  target  to  1.5  by  0.7  kilometers,  along 
a  northeast  trend  which  is  consistent  with  historical  geophysics 
anomalies. An  induced  polarization  survey  is  planned  for  the  first 
quarter of 2022 to further define targets for drill testing later in the 
year. The first phase of drilling at the Zambrana Central target failed 
to intersect a significant system, but did add support to the concept 
of  a  blind  target  below  the  thrusted  Hatillo  limestones  within  the 
Pueblo Viejo corridor, where significant high chargeability and low 
magnetic anomalies are present. 

Pascua-Lama Project Area, Argentina and Chile
At Pascua, the review of the incoming metallurgical results from the 
5,537 meter metallurgical campaign is ongoing. Initial results from 
bottle roll tests are being reviewed, and variability in data is being 
correlated  to  the  underlying  geology  models.  Flotation  variability 
testwork  results  are  expected  in  the  first  quarter  of  2022.  Bottle 
roll tests are showing indicative results that portions of the orebody 
do recover well through direct cyanidation. As a result, we plan to 

initiate a small 3,000 meter campaign in the first half of 2022 to test 
for  leachability  of  these  ore  types. This  work  continues  in  support 
of  our  effort  to  rebuild  a  geometallurgical  model  and  processing 
optionality review from first principles data.

At  Lama,  we  began  a  detailed  review  of  the  potential  high-
sulfidation  epithermal  targets  in  the  immediate  district  that  could 
tie into a greater Pascua- Lama project or optionality for Veladero. 
A drill program is being finalized and will be initiated with two rigs 
in  the  first  half  of  2022,  with  an  objective  of  defining  targets  that 
warrant future work, or elimination from ongoing optionality reviews.

El Indio Belt, Argentina and Chile
The  El  Indio  Belt  spans  for  over  120  kilometers  along  the  Chile-
Argentina  border  in  the  high  Andes,  from  Alturas-Del  Carmen 
at  the  southern  end  to  El  Encierro  in  the  north.  Barrick  controls 
significant ground over this highly productive and prospective belt. 
Our  exploration  efforts  have  been  focused  on  delineating  targets 
with potential to deliver value, including drill testing in nine different 
targets during 2021, with an additional six targets at drill-ready stage 
planned for 2022. Generative work has delivered seven additional 
targets for delineation, which are expected to represent additional 
exploration opportunities.

At Alturas-Del Carmen, work in the fourth quarter of 2021 was 
focused on a drilling campaign at Alturas, to test structural controls 
within  the  system  that  could  yield  higher-grade  controls  and 
preferred ore continuity, within the larger framework of the deposit. 
Drilling at the Del Carmen targets is expected to resume in the first 
quarter of 2022. 

Two holes drilled at Carmen Norte, located immediately to the 
north of the Rojo Grande mineralization in Del Carmen, confirmed 
the  presence  of  porphyry  style  mineralization,  associated  with 
reduced high-sulfidation mineralization in the upper part of the drill 
holes. However, grades are expected to be weak and a decision on 
further work will be made when results are received.

A  geophysical  survey  consisting  of  induced  polarization  and 
ground  magnetics  was  completed  at  the  Tayta  target  in  Bañitos 
identifying a strong conductive area related to a large mineralized 
stockwork surrounded by a high chargeability anomaly, interpreted 
to be part of the quartz-sericite-pyrite halo of a sizeable gold-copper 
porphyry  system.  One  framework  drillhole  was  completed  during 
the fourth quarter of 2021, which intersected intense quartz-pyrite-
molybdenite and chalcopyrite mineralization in a favorable, strongly 
magnetized and altered microdioritic host rock. These observations 
support the potential for a previously unexplored porphyry target at 
Tayta and further drilling is being planned. 

three  drillholes  successfully 

In  Chile,  drilling  started  at  the Azufreras  target  in  the  El  Indio 
Camp,  where 
intercepted  high-
sulfidation  style  alteration,  associated  with  different  styles  of 
phreatomagmatic  breccias  below  a  cover  of  250  to  300  meters 
of  a  fresh  or  weakly  altered  tuff,  which  creates  challenges  for 
the  economic  potential  of  the  target.  Upon  the  completion  of  two 
additional holes that are underway to test for shallower concepts in 
the target, a decision on further work will be made. 

Veladero District, Argentina
At Cerro Pelado, work continued through the fourth quarter of 2021 
to  consolidate  recent  drill  results  into  the  greater  Veladero  3D 
geological model. The updated model will be drill tested in the first 
quarter  of  2022,  with  the  objective  of  defining  a  viable  project  for 
inclusion in the Veladero life of mine plan.

Delineation  work  was  carried  out  at  Zancarron, 

located 
39  kilometers  to  the  south  of  Veladero,  in  an  area  containing 
structurally  controlled  high-sulphidation  veins. Two  drillholes  were 
subsequently completed at Zancarron, intersecting several intervals 
of  vuggy  silica  and  silicification  that  is  often  associated  with  high 
grade  in  the  system.  Assays  are  pending.  Additionally,  ongoing 
work shows potential for continuity of the Zancarron system under 
cover  to  the  southeast,  where  geochemical  results  from  talus 
sampling has revealed a 400 meter long gold and copper anomaly 
associated with alteration, that may represent the upper parts of a 
high-sulfidation system. 

098

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisEl Quevar, Argentina
Results received from an extensive talus fines sampling campaign at 
El Quevar has defined five areas for follow-up work within the large 
(greater  than  570  square  kilometer)  mining  property.  Consistent 
pathfinder anomalies (arsenic, antimony, bismuth) of a large, high-
sulphidation  system  have  been  defined  and  are  coincident  with 
significant  structures. This  information  supports  the  presence  of  a 
fully preserved target. 

A  controlled-source  audio-frequency  geophysical  survey 
was  completed  during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  and  drilling  is 
scheduled to start in the first quarter of 2022.

Porgera, Papua New Guinea
As  discussed  on  page  62,  Porgera  is  currently  on  temporary  
care  and  maintenance  and  consequently,  all  exploration  activities 
have ceased.

Japan Gold Strategic Alliance, Japan
Regional  scale  geochemical  sampling  programs  along  with 
geophysical  gravity  surveys  have  been  completed  and  interpreted 
over the majority of the portfolio and have led to the identification of 
a number of exciting target areas for further work. The Japan Gold 
and  Barrick  teams  are  working  collaboratively  to  prioritize  these 
areas of interest and define the follow-up work programs.

Makapa Project, Guyana
Systematic  geological  and  geochemical  screening  along  a  
60  kilometer  zone  of  the  Makapa-Kuribrong  Shear  Zone  is 
supporting the interpretation of prospectivity beneath post-mineral 
sand cover. A wide-spaced air-core drilling program is in progress 
and  low-level  gold  and  pathfinder  anomalism  in  the  southeastern 
extents of the project is coincident with and potentially controlled by 
a newly interpreted truncated fold closure. Drilling along the shear 
zone is ongoing.

Reunion Gold Strategic Alliance, Guiana Shield
Drilling  commenced  on  the  NW  Extension  project  in  Suriname 
late  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  and  10  drill  holes  have  been 
completed  to  date.  The  purpose  of  the  program  is  to  geologically 
and  geochemically  screen  the  projection  of  interpreted  structural 
corridors, similar to those associated with gold mineralization at the 
Rosebel gold deposit located 70 kilometers to the southeast. Post-
mineral cover on average has been less than or equal to 30 meters 
thick to date and bedrock comprised of volcanics and sediments is 
broadly  consistent  with  the  interpreted  geology.  Analytical  results 
are pending and the drilling program will continue through the first 
quarter of 2022.  

Africa & Middle East
Bambadji, Senegal
At  Bambadji,  in  addition  to  doubling  our  land  position  over  
the prospective Faleme Volcanics Domain, further data integration 
continued  to  upgrade  the  geology  models,  while  geochemistry  
has generated additional robust anomalies to be tested in the next 
field season. 

Kabewest continues to emerge as a new discovery and further 
modeling  undertaken  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  supports 
potential for significant upside. The next phase of drilling is planned 
to  define  the  down-dip  extent  of  the  system  and  target  potentially 
blind mineralization along strike.

At Soya, a new soil sampling program has already delineated four 
kilometers of high tenor anomalies to the north with a prospective 
north-northwest  corridor  emerging  along  strike  from  Gounkoto  on 
the  eastern  margin  of  the  albitite. An  RC  drilling  program  is  being 
designed to test this area and the potential strike extension of the 
Gounkoto domain boundary into the Bambadji permit.

At  Baqata  Ridge,  additional  rock  sampling  was  undertaken  to 
assess  the  tenor  of  mineralization  in  the  host  sandstone  between 
already  defined  high-grade  quartz-carbonate-hematite-pyrite  vein 
arrays.  This  new  sampling  returned  values  from  hematite  altered 
sandstone supporting the high-grade potential of this target. Further 
mapping and drilling are planned to rapidly progress this Gara-style 
deposit (an underground mine at Loulo-Gounkoto).

Loulo-Gounkoto, Mali19
At  Yalea  Ridge,  Phase  2  drilling  continues  with  the  aim  of  further 
defining  the  extents  and  footprint  of  the  system,  while  providing 
detailed  geological  information  to  enable  the  building  of  the  first 
integrated  3D  geological  model  of  the  target.  In  the  fourth  quarter 
of 2021, drilling successfully intersected the system at 400 meters 
vertical  depth  with  results  including:  3.20  meters  at  15.53  g/t Au, 
12.40 meters at 3.33 g/t Au and 5.23 meters at 9.54 g/t Au. To date, 
the highest gold grades are associated with sheeted quartz veinlets 
and hematite-quartz shear veins. 

Along strike to the north from Yalea Ridge, at Sansamba West, 
first  pass  aircore  drilling  over  previously  defined  auger  anomalies 
returned encouraging results in a similar geological setting to Yalea 
Ridge.  Intersections  associated  with  hematite  alteration  included 
3.00 meters at 3.05 g/t Au, 6.00 meters at 2.89 g/t Au, including 2.00 
meters at 7.36 g/t Au and 8.00 meters at 3.57 g/t Au, including 4.00 
meters  at  5.77  g/t.  This  confirms  continuity  of  the  system  over  at 
least a 1.20 kilometer strike length beyond Yalea Ridge, highlighting 
the continued prospectivity of this trend. 

At  Loulo  1-2  Complex  (Yalea  Structure),  the  stratigraphic 
framework  has  been  resolved  with  recent  diamond  drilling  and 
historical  reverse  circulation  and  diamond  drill  holes  have  been 
relogged  within  this  framework.  Next  steps  are  to  incorporate  the 
relogged  structural  architecture  and  assess  complexities  that  may 
influence  grade  and  shoot  distribution.  The  outcomes  from  this 
model update will dictate subsequent drill planning. 

At  the  Faraba  Complex,  drilling  through  2021  was  aimed  to 
assess the continuity of mineralization through this entire complex 
and  figure  out  the  potential  for  merging  two  resources  into  one 
mineralized  system.  Drilling  has  confirmed  the  continuation  of 
Faraba  Main  mineralization  (footwall  zones  1  and  2)  300  meters 
to the north into Faraba Gap, and main zone 2 mineralization has 
been  traced  280  meters  south  from  Faraba  North  into  Faraba 
Gap.  In  addition,  the  possibility  for  a  high-grade  horizontal  shoot 
within  the  Dip  Domain  Boundary  Structure,  beneath  the  current 
optimized  pit  shell  has  been  identified.  Overall,  results  are  very 
encouraging  for  building  a  continuous  resource  through  this  area. 
Further infill drilling is required and will be designed and planned for 
commencement in the first quarter of 2022. 

At  Gounkoto  DB1,  located  two  kilometers  to  the  south  of 
Gounkoto,  drill  results  within  the  overall  DB  structure  have  been 
weak.  However,  drilling  did  intersect  39  meters  of  high-grade 
footwall zone mineralization which indicates potential for Gounkoto-
style  mineralization.  Geological  modeling  is  ongoing  with  further 
drilling planned for early in the first quarter of 2022.

Tongon, Côte d’Ivoire20
At  Seydou  North,  step-out  drilling  is  confirming  an  additional  
90  meters  down-plunge  continuity  of  mineralization  at  depth. 
Results  include  16.13  meters  at  2.32  g/t Au  and  10.90  meters  at  
2.27 g/t Au. Infill resource conversion drilling has returned better than 
expected results including 35 meters at 8.99 g/t Au and 28 meters  
at 6.24 g/t Au. Geotechnical drilling to support an updated pit design 
commenced in January 2022.

Building  on  auger  results  along  the  fertile  Stabilo  trend  from 
the second quarter of 2021, ten targets were identified, ranked and 
drill  tested  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021.  New  potential  zones  of 
mineralization  have  been  identified  at  multiple  targets  with  initial 
results including 15 meters at 3.54 g/t Au from the Koro A2 target 
and  10  meters  at  0.96  g/t Au  from  the  Koro A1  target. Additional 
high  priority  targets  are  Jubula  Main  and  Jubula  West.  A  second 
phase of drilling to test these targets will commence in 2022.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 099

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  At  Bulyanhulu,  detailed  regolith  mapping  shows  prospective 
geology  and  mineralized  trends  are  largely  covered  by  lake 
sediments  and  river  alluvium,  preserving  the  exploration  potential 
of  the  district.  Results  from  recent  geochemical  drilling  through 
this  cover  have  generated  several  priority  targets  in  the  northeast 
of  the  mining  license.  Two  of  these  targets  are  drill-ready  for  the 
first quarter of 2022. Program objectives are to discover additional 
resources  that  will  increase  our  inventory  and  introduce  open-pit 
flexibility into the mine plan. 

Regional Exploration, Tanzania
After  the  successful  granting  of  2,600  square  kilometers  of  new 
regional permits earlier in 2021, reconnaissance field programs and 
exploration planning intensified during the fourth quarter of 2021. In 
the Ndalilo and Maji-Moto districts, over 330 kilometers of traverses 
were  completed  leading  to  the  delivery  of  six  priority  areas  of 
interest  and  two  new  structural  corridors  with  over  10  kilometers 
of  prospective  strike  (combined)  for  advancement  in  the  first  half 
of 2022.

Delivering  on  our  strategy  of  increased  investment  in  new 
growth  opportunities,  in  partnership  with  the  Government  of 
Tanzania,  we  have  entered  into  a  binding  agreement  with  Tembo 
Gold  Corporation  for  the  acquisition  of  six  highly  prospective 
prospecting  licenses  adjacent  to  the  Bulyanhulu  mining  permit. 
These  licenses  contain  extensions  to  prospective  structures  and 
geology and have the potential to add mineral reserves to Barrick’s 
asset  base  in  Tanzania.  This  transaction  is  subject  to  customary 
regulatory  approvals,  which  are  expected  to  be  complete  in  the 
first quarter of 2022. Reconnaissance programs are currently being 
designed for implementation as soon as approvals are complete. 

Egypt, Regional Exploration
In  Egypt,  the  administrative  and  technical  setup  in-country  is 
progressing. Field visits to the four licenses areas were undertaken 
in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021.  Field  observations  validate  regional 
spectral  interpretation  from  satellite  imagery.  Detailed  alteration, 
lithological  and  structural  mapping 
is  underway  using  high-
resolution,  multi-spectral  satellite  imagery  to  aid  rapid  testing  of 
ground and targets during the first year field program in 2022. 

Jabal Sayid, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia22
At  Jabal  Sayid  Lode  1,  exploration  drilling  intersected  significant 
copper  mineralization  of  135.7  meters  at  1.93%  Cu,  indicating 
strong potential to grow the Lode 1 resource along strike and down-
plunge to the southwest. Geological observations from this part of 
the deposit continue to support the presence of a conceptual feeder 
at depth, with infill drilling planned for the first half of 2022. 

to 

Ongoing  exploration  continues 

identify  multiple  new 
opportunities  along  the  target  palaeosurface  along  strike  from  
Lode 4. A key exploration focus is the North Gossan target located 
500 meters north of Lode 4. Multiple zones of VMS-style alteration 
within  the  favorable  rhyolite  host  stratigraphy  was  observed  in 
exploration  drilling  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021.  Additional  gaps, 
including  around  known  lodes  and  possible  new  mineralization 
along  strike  to  the  south-southwest  will  be  advanced  in  2022, 
including the South Gossan and Wadi Ghafara targets. 

Regional Exploration, Côte d’Ivoire
At  Fonondara  on  the  Boundiali  permit,  results  from  two  deep 
diamond  drillholes  confirmed  the  extension  of  mineralization  for 
more  than  75  vertical  meters  and  infill  drilling  to  assess  satellite 
potential to Tongon is currently being planned.

Kibali, Democratic Republic of Congo21
At  KCD,  the  third  hole  and  final  hole  of  the  deep  drilling  program 
was  completed,  testing  500  meters  down  plunge  of  the  9000  and 
12000  lode  systems.  The  targeted  lodes  and  related  banded  iron 
formation (“BIF”) were not intersected; however, a 150 meter wide 
zone of alteration with anomalous mineralization was intersected at 
the 9000 lode targeted depth. Analysis of the data suggests the BIF 
and lodes have swung slightly to the southeast. The next phase of 
exploration  will  commence  after  additional  infill  drilling  up  plunge 
more clearly defines the trend of these lodes.

Also at KCD, three underground conversion drillholes targeting 
the high-grade 3106 lode were extended by exploration, to test for 
opportunities  to  the  northwest  of  the  main  KCD  system. All  holes 
intersected a new BIF with alteration and anomalous mineralization. 
This  indicates  exploration  potential  to  the  northwest  of  the  main 
KCD  system  between  KCD  and  the  Gorumbwa  and  Kombokolo 
deposits,  opening  a  kilometer  scale  exploration  play  that  is  very 
sparsely tested. Additional drilling is being planned.

At Kalimva, the first hole of a 19 hole follow -st the down-plunge 
continuation  of  high-grade  shoots  and  to  assess  the  continuity 
of  mineralization  between  shoots  along  the  structure.  This  hole 
was  located  on  the  expected  edge  of  the  system  and  confirmed 
lithologies,  structure,  alteration  and  anomalous  mineralization. 
Remaining  holes  in  this  program  will  continue  to  be  drilled  in  
early 2022.

At Kolapi, the first phase of drilling commenced to test open-pit 
potential  along  a  1.6  kilometer  section  of  the  prolific  KZ  structure 
between the Oere and Mofu pits. Significant results thus far include 
4 meters at 3.8 g/t Au, including 1 meter at 6.27 g/t Au. This open-
pit opportunity is close to mine infrastructure including the Ikamva-
Kalimva-Oere haul road.

At  Makoro,  fieldwork  aims  to  build  geological  understanding 
behind  stream  sediment  and  soil  anomalies.  Observations  and 
results  indicate  a  shear  zone  system  comprising  a  number  of  sub 
parallel  structures  that  extend  over  two  kilometers.  Exploration 
is  just  commencing  but  lithosamples  and  pit  groove  samples  are 
returning  encouraging  results.  The  shear  zone  remains  open 
along strike towards the northwest and southeast. Exploration and 
construction of the geology model is ongoing.

North Mara and Bulyanhulu, Tanzania
Building upon work reported in the third quarter of 2021, mapping 
and  rock  chip  sampling  continued  at  North  Mara  with  a  1,020 
square kilometer area completed during the fourth quarter of 2021. 
This  has  delivered  four  new  areas  of  interest  over  priority  targets 
showing  key  indicators  for  mineralization  including  host  rocks, 
structure, alteration and geochemical pathfinders.

At the Ochuna target, located 45 kilometers west of the Rama 
deposit,  the  structural  review  to  update  the  geology  mode  has 
concluded.  This  work  shows  several  east-northeast  and  west-
northwest  zones  of  higher-grade  mineralization,  controlled  by 
lithologic  contacts  and  increased  vein  intensity.  Intervening  rock 
between  the  higher-grade  mineralization  contains  broad  halos  of 
lower-grade  disseminated  pyrite,  which  increases  mineralization 
continuity in the system. Resource estimation and pit optimization 
activities are planned for early 2022 to further evaluate this target 
as a potential new satellite opportunity.

100

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisREVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
Revenue

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD PRODUCTION VARIANCE (000s oz)
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021

($ millions, except 
per ounce/pound 
data in dollars)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Gold

000s oz solda
000s oz  
  produceda
Market price  

($/oz)

Realized price  

($/oz)b

Revenue

Copper

millions lbs solda
millions lbs  
  produceda
Market price  

($/lb)

Realized price  

($/lb)b

Revenue

Other sales

1,234

1,071

4,468

4,879

5,467

1,203

1,092

4,437

4,760

5,465

1,795

1,790

1,799

1,770

1,393

1,793

2,977

1,771

2,531

1,790

1,778

10,738

11,670

1,396

9,186

113

126

101

100

423

415

457

457

355

432

4.40

4.25

4.23

2.80

2.72

4.63

263

70

3.98

209

86

4.32

962

285

2.92

697

228

2.77

393

138

Total revenue

3,310

2,826

11,985

12,595

9,717

a.  On an attributable basis. 
b.   Further  information  on  these  non-GAAP  financial  measures,  including 
detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.

Both  2021  gold  and  copper  production  of  4.44  million  ounces 
and  415  million  pounds,  respectively,  were  within  the  guidance 
ranges  of  4.4  to  4.7  million  ounces  and  410  to  460  million  
pounds, respectively.

Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  gold  revenues  increased  by  18% 
compared to the third quarter of 2021 primarily due to higher sales 
volume, combined with a higher realized gold price6. The average 
market price for the three month period ended December 31, 2021 
was $1,795 per ounce versus $1,790 per ounce for the prior quarter. 
During  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  the  gold  price  ranged  from  
$1,746  per  ounce  to  $1,877  per  ounce  and  closed  the  quarter  at 
$1,806 per ounce. Gold prices in the fourth quarter of 2021 continued 
to be volatile as a result of impacts relating to the Covid-19 pandemic, 
including  the  progress  of  vaccine  distribution  and  emergence  of 
variants,  as  well  as  growing  concerns  about  increased  levels  of 
inflation  and  expectations  for  continued  economic  recovery  that  
are forecast to lead to increases in benchmark interest rates in the 
near future. 

Q3 2021

Carlin (61.5%)

Cortez (61.5%)

Veladero (50%)

Bulyanhulu (84%)

North Mara (84%)

Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)

Kibali (45%)

Other

Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)

Pueblo Viejo (60%)

Q4 2021

1,092

86

39

13

4

3

0

(1)

(2)

(11)

(20)

1,203

In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  attributable  gold  production  was  
111 thousand ounces higher than the prior quarter, primarily due to 
the strong performance from Carlin and Cortez following the repair 
of the Goldstrike roaster completed at the end of the third quarter 
of 2021, which allowed for increased processing of material mined 
from both sites. Gold sales volume also benefited as Veladero sold 
a portion of its built-up gold inventory.

Copper  revenues  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  increased 
by  26%  compared  to  the  prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  a  higher 
realized copper price6, combined with higher copper sales volume. 
The average market price in the fourth quarter of 2021 was $4.40 
per pound versus $4.25 per pound in the prior quarter. In the fourth 
quarter  of  2021,  the  realized  copper  price6  was  higher  than  the 
market copper price due to the impact of positive provisional pricing 
adjustments,  whereas  a  negative  provisional  pricing  adjustment 
was recorded in the prior quarter. During the fourth quarter of 2021, 
the copper price ranged from $4.10 per pound to $4.66 per pound 
and  closed  the  quarter  at  $4.40  per  pound.  Copper  prices  in  the 
fourth  quarter  of  2021  were  positively  influenced  by  economic 
optimism following the lifting of some pandemic related restrictions, 
supply constraints and low copper stockpiles.

Attributable  copper  production  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021 
increased  by  26  million  pounds  compared  to  the  prior  quarter, 
primarily  at  Lumwana  due  to  increased  throughput  levels.  Copper 
sales  were  lower  than  production,  primarily  due  to  the  timing  of 
shipments at Lumwana.

2021 compared to 2020
In  2021,  gold  revenues  decreased  by  8%  compared  to  the  prior 
year, primarily due to a decrease in sales volumes, partially offset 
by an increase in the realized gold price6. The average market gold 
price  for  2021  was  $1,799  per  ounce  versus  $1,770  per  ounce  in 
the prior year. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 101

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
Production Costs

($ millions, except 
per ounce/pound 
data in dollars)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Gold

Site operating  
  costs

Depreciation

Royalty expense
Community  
relations

Cost of sales
Cost of sales  

($/oz)a

Total cash costs  

($/oz)b

All-in sustaining  
  costs ($/oz)b

Copper

Site operating  
  costs

Depreciation

Royalty expense
Community  
relations

Cost of sales
Cost of sales  

($/lb)a

C1 cash costs  

($/lb)b

All-in sustaining  
  costs ($/lb)b

512

93

9

1,157

1,025

4,218

1,889

371

4,421

1,975

410

4,274

1,902

308

475

93

8

26

26

30

1,771

1,601

6,504

6,832

6,514

1,075

1,122

1,093

1,056

1,005

715

739

725

971

1,034

1,026

63

43

28

0

134

73

60

27

2

162

266

197

103

3

569

699

967

292

208

54

2

556

671

894

224

100

34

3

361

2.21

2.57

2.32

2.02

2.14

1.63

1.85

1.72

1.54

1.69

2.92

2.60

2.62

2.23

2.52

a.   Gold  cost  of  sales  per  ounce  is  calculated  as  cost  of  sales  across  our 
gold  operations  (excluding  sites  in  closure  or  care  and  maintenance) 
divided  by  ounces  sold  (both  on  an  attributable  basis  using  Barrick’s 
ownership  share).  Copper  cost  of  sales  per  pound  is  calculated  as  cost 
of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an 
attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). 

b.   Further  information  on  these  non-GAAP  financial  measures,  including 
detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.

In  2021,  attributable  gold  production  was  4,437  thousand 
ounces, or 323 thousand ounces lower than the prior year, mainly 
due  to  the  mechanical  mill  failure  at  Carlin’s  Goldstrike  roaster, 
Porgera being placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, 
lower underground productivity related to Covid-19 restrictions that 
slowed  the  ramp-up  of  underground  development  at  Hemlo,  and 
lower grades and throughput at Tongon reflecting the change in the 
mine  plan  related  to  the  previously  disclosed  mine  life  extension 
to  2023.  This  was  combined  with  reduced  heap  leach  processing 
operations at Veladero through the first half of 2021 due to Covid-19 
related  delays  in  the  commissioning  of  Phase  6  of  the  leach  pad 
and  lower  grades  processed  in  line  with  the  mine  and  stockpile 
processing  plan  at  Pueblo  Viejo.  These  impacts  were  partially 
offset  by  increased  production  at  Bulyanhulu  following  the  ramp-
up of underground mining and processing operations starting near 
the  end  of  2020.  Gold  sales  were  higher  than  gold  production  in 
2021  as  Veladero  sold  a  portion  of  its  built-up  gold  inventory.  In 
2020,  gold  sales  were  higher  than  gold  production  following  the  
recommencement of exports of concentrate stockpiled in Tanzania, 
which was completed in the third quarter of 2020.

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD PRODUCTION VARIANCE (000s oz)
Year ended December 31, 2021

2020

Other*

Carlin (61.5%)

Pueblo Viejo (60%)

Veladero (50%)

North Mara (84%)

Kibali (45%)

Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)

Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)

Cortez (61.5%)

Bulyanhulu (84%)

2021

4,760

(287)

(101)

(54)

(54)

(1)

2

4

16

18

134

4,437

* Other consists primarily of Porgera, Tongon, Hemlo and Buzwagi.

Copper  revenues  for  2021  were  up  38%  compared  to  the  prior 
year due to a higher realized copper price6, partially offset by lower 
copper  sales  volume.  In  both  2021  and  2020,  the  realized  copper 
price6 was higher than the market copper price as a result of positive 
provisional pricing adjustments to copper sales that were subject to 
finalization at the end of each year. 

Attributable copper production for 2021 was 42 million pounds 
lower than the prior year, mainly due to lower grades processed and 
lower throughput at Lumwana. 

102

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
2021 compared to Guidance
2021 cost of sales applicable to gold7 was $1,093 per ounce, slightly 
higher than our guidance range of $1,020 to $1,070 per ounce. Gold 
total cash costs6 for 2021 of $725 per ounce was at the higher end 
of the guidance range of $680 to $730, while all-in sustaining costs6 
for 2021 of $1,026 per ounce was slightly higher than the guidance 
range of $970 to $1,020 per ounce. The higher gold cost metrics are 
mainly driven by the Nevada Mining Education Tax, which became 
effective  on  July  1,  2021  and  therefore  was  not  factored  into  our 
guidance for the year (refer to page 74), as well as higher royalty 
expense due to a higher realized gold price6. 

2021  cost  of  sales  applicable  to  copper7  and  C1  cash  costs6 
were  $2.32  per  pound  and  $1.72  per  pound,  respectively,  higher 
than  our  guidance  ranges  of  $1.90  to  $2.10  per  pound  and  $1.40 
to  $1.60  per  pound,  respectively.  2021  copper  all-in  sustaining 
costs6 of $2.62 per pound was also higher than our guidance range 
of  $2.00  to  $2.20  per  pound. All  copper  cost  metrics  for  the  year 
were above guidance due to the impact of lower production, higher 
maintenance costs at Zaldívar and higher royalty expense driven by 
a higher realized copper price6.

Capital Expendituresa

($ millions)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Minesite    
  sustainingb,c
Project capital  
  expendituresb,d
Capitalized interest

Total    
  consolidated  
  capital  
  expenditures
Attributable  
  capital  
  expenditurese
2021 Attributable  
  capital  
  expenditures  
  guidancee

431

234

4

386

1,673

1,559

1,320

179

4

747

15

471

24

370

11

669

569

2,435

2,054

1,701

552

456

1,951

1,651

1,512

$1,800 
to
$2,100

a.  These amounts are presented on a cash basis.
b.   Further  information  on  these  non-GAAP  financial  measures,  including 
detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.

c.  Includes both minesite sustaining and mine development.
d.   Project capital expenditures are included in our calculation of all-in costs, 

but not included in our calculation of all-in sustaining costs.

e.   These  amounts  are  presented  on  the  same  basis  as  our  guidance  on  

page 63.

Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In the fourth quarter of 2021, cost of sales applicable to gold was 
11%  higher  compared  to  the  third  quarter  of  2021,  primarily  as  a 
result  of  higher  sales  volume.  Our  45%  interest  in  Kibali  is  equity 
accounted and we therefore do not include its cost of sales in our 
consolidated  gold  cost  of  sales.  On  a  per  ounce  basis,  cost  of 
sales  applicable  to  gold7  and  total  cash  costs6,  after  including  our 
proportionate share of cost of sales at our equity method investees, 
were 4% and 3% lower, respectively, than the prior quarter, primarily 
at Cortez due to sales mix with a higher proportion from lower cost 
underground production and at Carlin resulting from continued cost 
discipline, offset by the impact of planned maintenance and higher 
natural gas prices at Pueblo Viejo. 

In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  gold  all-in  sustaining  costs6 
decreased  by  6%  on  a  per  ounce  basis  compared  to  the  prior 
quarter,  primarily  due  to  lower  total  cash  costs  per  ounce6  as 
discussed  above,  combined  with  lower  minesite  sustaining  capital 
expenditures6 on a per ounce basis.

In the fourth quarter of 2021, cost of sales applicable to copper 
was  17%  lower  than  the  prior  quarter,  primarily  due  to  lower 
depreciation  and  higher  capitalized  stripping,  partially  offset  by 
higher mining costs at Lumwana. Our 50% interests in Zaldívar and 
Jabal Sayid are equity accounted and therefore we do not include 
their  cost  of  sales  in  our  consolidated  copper  cost  of  sales.  On  a 
per  pound  basis,  cost  of  sales  applicable  to  copper7  and  C1  cash 
costs6 after including our proportionate share of cost of sales at our 
equity method investees, decreased by 14% and 12%, respectively, 
compared  to  the  prior  quarter  primarily  due  to  higher  capitalized 
stripping, partially offset by higher mining costs at Lumwana. Cost 
of  sales  per  pound  was  further  impacted  by  lower  depreciation 
expense at Lumwana. 

In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  copper  all-in  sustaining  costs6, 
which  have  been  adjusted  to  include  our  proportionate  share  of 
equity  method  investees,  were  12%  higher  per  pound  than  the 
prior quarter, primarily reflecting higher minesite sustaining capital 
expenditures6 at Lumwana mainly related to new mining equipment 
and stripping, partially offset by lower C1 cash costs per pound6. 

2021 compared to 2020
In 2021, cost of sales applicable to gold was 5% lower than the prior 
year  primarily  due  to  lower  sales  volume.  On  a  per  ounce  basis, 
cost  of  sales  applicable  to  gold7,  after  including  our  proportionate 
share  of  cost  of  sales  at  our  equity  method  investees,  and  total 
cash  costs  per  ounce6  were  both  4%  higher  than  the  prior  year, 
primarily due to the impact of lower grades, mainly at Tongon and 
North Mara. 

In  2021,  gold  all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce6  increased  by 
6%  compared  to  the  prior  year  primarily  due  to  higher  total  cash 
costs per ounce6, combined with higher minesite sustaining capital 
expenditures6.

In 2021, cost of sales applicable to copper was 2% higher than 
the prior year, primarily due to higher royalties at Lumwana, which 
is a function of a higher realized copper price6. Our 50% interests 
in Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid are equity accounted and therefore we 
do not include their cost of sales in our consolidated copper cost of 
sales. On a per pound basis, cost of sales applicable to copper7 and 
C1  cash  costs6,  after  including  our  proportionate  share  of  cost  of 
sales at our equity method investees, increased by 15% and 12%, 
respectively,  compared  to  the  prior  year,  primarily  due  to  higher 
royalty expense as a result of a higher realized copper price6 and 
the impact of lower sales volume.

Copper  all-in  sustaining  costs  per  pound6  was  17%  higher  
than  the  prior  year,  primarily  reflecting  the  higher  total  C1  cash 
costs per pound6, combined with higher minesite sustaining capital 
expenditures6.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 103

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In the fourth quarter of 2021, total consolidated capital expenditures 
on  a  cash  basis  were  18%  higher  than  the  third  quarter  of  2021, 
due to an increase in both minesite sustaining capital expenditures6 
and  project  capital  expenditures6.  Minesite  sustaining  capital 
expenditures6  increased  by  12%  compared  to  the  prior  quarter, 
primarily at Lumwana due to new mining equipment and stripping, at 
North Mara from the initial capital spend on the restart of the open-
pit  mine,  and  at  Bulyanhulu  mainly  for  the  long-term  underground 
fleet. Project capital expenditures6 increased by 30% primarily due 
to  the  plant  expansion  and  mine  life  extension  project  at  Pueblo 
Viejo, the development of the third underground mine and expansion 
of  power  capacity  at  Loulo-Gounkoto,  and  the  commencement  of 
construction for the Phase 7A leach pad at Veladero. 

2021 compared to 2020
In  2021,  total  consolidated  capital  expenditures  on  a  cash  basis 
increased by 19% compared to the prior year. This was primarily due 
to a 59% increase in project capital expenditures6 mainly attributable 
to the Pueblo Viejo plant expansion and mine life extension project, 
as  well  as  the  development  of  the  third  underground  mine  and 
expansion of power capacity at Loulo-Gounkoto. This was partially 
offset by a decrease at Cortez due to lower cost development and 
exploration  activities  at  Goldrush  underground.  The  increase  in 
project  capital  expenditures6  was  combined  with  higher  minesite 
sustaining  capital  expenditures6  of  7%,  mainly  resulting  from  the 
Phase  6  leach  pad  expansion  at  Veladero,  and  at  Carlin  due  to 
an  increase  in  capitalized  waste  stripping  and  the  purchase  of  an 
oxygen plant at the Goldstrike autoclave. This was combined with 
an increase at Turquoise Ridge relating to underground equipment 
purchases and process efficiency related projects.

2021 compared to Guidance
Attributable capital expenditures for 2021 of $1,951 million was at 
the lower end of the guidance range of $1,800 to $2,100 million. 

General and Administrative Expenses 

($ millions)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Corporate  
  administrationa
Share-based  
  compensationb
Tanzaniac
General & 
  administrative  
  expenses
2021 General &  
  administrative  
  expenses  
  guidance

32

7

0

39

23

118

118

148

4

0

33

0

67

0

37

27

27

151

185

212

~$190

a.   For  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  corporate 
administration  costs  include  approximately  $nil  and  $nil,  respectively,  of 
severance costs (September 30, 2021: $nil; 2020 $nil; 2019: $18 million).
b.   Based on US$19.00 share price as at December 31, 2021 (September 30,  
2021:  US$18.24;  2020:  US$22.78;  2019:  $18.59)  and  excludes  share-
based compensation relating to Tanzania.

c. Formerly known as Acacia Mining plc. 

Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In the fourth quarter of 2021, general and administrative expenses 
increased  by  $12  million  compared  to  the  third  quarter  of  2021, 
primarily due to higher spend on external services. 

2021 compared to 2020
General  and  administrative  expenses  decreased  by  $34  million 
compared to the prior year due to lower share-based compensation 
expense  as  a  result  of  our  lower  share  price  in  the  current  period 
compared to an increase in the same prior year period.

2021 compared to Guidance
General  and  administrative  expenses  were  lower  than  guidance 
of  ~$190  million.  Corporate  administration  expenses  of  $118 
million  were  below  our  guidance  of  ~$130  million,  highlighting  the 
continued benefit of our cost reduction activities, while share-based 
compensation expense of $33 million was lower than our guidance 
of ~$60 million, resulting from a decrease in our share price.

Exploration, Evaluation and Project Costs

($ millions)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Global exploration  
  and evaluation

Project costs:

Pascua-Lama

Other
Corporate  
  development
Business   

improvement  
  and innovation
Global exploration  
  and evaluation  
  and project  
  expense
Minesite    
  exploration and  
  evaluation

Total exploration,  
  evaluation  
  and project  
  expenses
2021 total E&E 
  and project  
  expenses  
  guidance

35

16

11

8

0

70

12

26

122

143

143

9

8

4

0

47

20

46

39

16

0

37

27

9

0

49

20

51

10

223

216

273

64

79

69

82

67

287

295

342

$280  
to  
$320

104

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Exploration, evaluation and project expenses for the fourth quarter 
of  2021  increased  by  $15  million  compared  to  the  prior  quarter. 
This was primarily due to higher project costs at Pascua-Lama and 
higher  global  exploration  and  evaluation  costs  mainly  at  Nevada 
Gold  Mines  due  to  increased  drilling.  This  was  partially  offset  by 
lower minesite exploration and evaluation costs, primarily at Carlin. 

2021 compared to 2020
Exploration,  evaluation  and  project  costs  for  2021  decreased  by 
$8 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to lower global 
exploration  and  evaluation  costs  at  Fourmile  and  lower  minesite 
exploration and evaluation costs, mainly at Carlin due to lower drill 
and  crew  availability.  This  was  partially  offset  by  higher  project 
costs across various projects.

2021 compared to Guidance
Exploration,  evaluation  and  project  expenses  for  2021  of  $287 
million  were  within  the  guidance  range  of  $280  to  $320  million. 
Exploration and evaluation costs of $223 million were slightly lower 
than the guidance range of $230 million to $250 million and project 
expenses of $64 million were in the middle of the guidance range of 
$50 million to $70 million.

Finance Costs, Net

($ millions)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Interest expensea
Accretion
Loss on debt  
  extinguishment

Interest capitalized

Other finance costs

Finance income

Finance costs,  
  net
2021 finance  
  costs, net  
  guidance

90

10

0

(5)

1

94

13

0

(4)

0

(12)

(10)

84

93

357

48

0

(16)

8

(42)

355
$330 
to 
$370 

342

41

15

(24)

1

(28)

435

75

3

(14)

1

(31)

347

469

a.   For the three months and year ended December 31, 2021, interest expense 
includes  approximately  $9  million  and  $35  million,  respectively,  of  non-
cash interest expense relating to the gold and silver streaming agreements 
with Wheaton and Royal Gold, Inc. (September 30, 2021: $8 million; 2020: 
$34 million; 2019: $103 million).

Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In the fourth quarter of 2021, finance costs, net decreased by 10% 
compared  to  the  prior  quarter,  mainly  due  to  minor  decreases  in 
both  interest  expense  and  accretion,  combined  with  marginally 
higher finance income.

2021 compared to 2020
In  2021,  finance  costs,  net  were  2%  higher  than  the  prior  year, 
primarily  due  to  higher  interest  expense,  combined  with  higher 
accretion resulting from an increase in market interest rates. This was  
partially offset by a loss on debt extinguishment of $15 million occurring  
in  the  same  prior  year  period.  The  loss  on  debt  extinguishment 
in  the  prior  year  was  due  to  the  make-whole  repurchase  of  the 
outstanding $337 million of principal of our 3.85% notes due 2022. 

2021 compared to Guidance
Finance costs, net for 2021 of $355 million were within the guidance 
range of $330 to $370 million. 

Additional Significant Statement of Income Items

($ millions)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Impairment  
  charges  

(reversals)

Loss on currency  

translation
Other (income)  
  expense

14

13

(130)

10

5

18

(63)

(269)

(1,423)

29

50

109

(67)

(178)

(3,100)

Impairment Charges (Reversals)

($ millions)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21
Post-tax  
(our 
share)

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19
Post-tax  
Post-tax  
(our 
(our 
share)
share)

Post-tax  
(our 
share)

Post-tax  
(our 
share)

Asset impairments  

(reversals)
Lagunas Norte

Pueblo Viejo

Golden Sunlight

Hemlo

Tanzania

Pascua-Lama
Nevada Gold  
  Mines

Lumwana

Veladero

Other

Total asset 

impairment  

  charges  

(reversals)

Tax effects  
  and NCI

Total impairment  
  charges  

(reversals)

0

0

12

0

(1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(2)

10

9

5

14

10

0

10

(86)

(2)

12

4

3

1

0

0

0

4

0

2

0

0

(91)

0

6

0

0

15

12

(277)

0

0

0

296

48

(663)

2

14

(64)

(68)

(568)

1

(201)

(855)

(63)

(269)

(1,423)

Impairment Charges (Reversals)
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  net  impairment  charges  were  
$9  million  (net  of  tax  and  non-controlling  interests)  compared  to  
$10  million  (net  of  tax  and  non-controlling  interests)  in  the  prior 
quarter. The net impairment charge in both the current quarter and 
prior quarter relate to miscellaneous assets. 

2021 compared to 2020
In 2021, we recognized $64 million (net of tax and non-controlling 
interests)  of  net  impairment  reversals  for  non-current  assets. This 
was  mainly  due  to  the  impairment  reversal  at  Lagunas  Norte  of  
$86 million (net of tax) resulting from the agreement to sell our 100% 
interest  to  Boroo.  This  compares  to  net  impairment  reversals  of  
$68 million (net of tax and non-controlling interests) in 2020 mainly 
from our Tanzanian assets as the agreement with the Government 
of Tanzania was made effective in the first quarter of 2020. 

Refer  to  note  21  to  the  Financial  Statements  for  a  full  
description  of  impairment  charges,  including  pre-tax  amounts  and 
sensitivity analysis.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 105

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss on Currency Translation
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
Loss  on  currency  translation  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  was 
$13 million compared to $5 million in the prior quarter. The losses 
in  both  quarters  mainly  relate  to  unrealized  foreign  currency 
translation  losses  from  the  depreciation  of  the  Argentine  peso. 
The  current  quarter  was  also  impacted  by  the  depreciation  of  the 
Zambian  kwacha,  whereas  in  the  prior  quarter  the  appreciation  of 
the  Zambian  kwacha  partially  offset  the  losses  on  the  Argentine 
peso. Fluctuations in these currencies versus the US dollar revalue 
our  peso  and  kwacha  denominated  value-added  tax  receivable 
balances. 

2021 compared to 2020
Loss  on  currency  translation  for  2021  was  $29  million  compared 
to  $50  million  in  the  prior  year.  The  losses  in  both  years  mainly 
relate to unrealized foreign currency losses from the Argentine peso 
and  the  Zambian  kwacha,  however  the  rate  of  depreciation  of  the 
Argentine peso moderated compared to the same prior year period. 
Fluctuations  in  these  currencies  versus  the  US  dollar  revalue 
our  peso  and  kwacha  denominated  value-added  tax  receivable 
balances. 

Other Expense (Income)
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  other  income  was  $130  million 
compared  to  other  expense  of  $18  million  in  the  prior  quarter. 
Other income in the fourth quarter of 2021 mainly relates to a gain 
on  the  sale  of  Lone  Tree  of  $205  million  (refer  to  note  4  to  the 
Financial  Statements  for  more  information),  partially  offset  by  a  
$25 million litigation settlement, $21 million of supplies obsolescence 
at  Buzwagi,  and  care  and  maintenance  expenses  at  Porgera.  In 
the  prior  quarter,  other  expense  primarily  relates  to  care  and 
maintenance expenses at Porgera and losses on the revaluation of 
warrant investments. 

2021 compared to 2020
Other income was $67 million in 2021 compared to $178 million in 
the prior year. In 2021, we recognized a gain on the sale of Lone Tree 
of $205 million, partially offset by care and maintenance expenses 
at  Porgera  of  $51  million,  a  $25  million  litigation  settlement  and 
supplies  obsolescence  at  Buzwagi  of  $21  million.  In  2020,  other 
income  mainly  relates  to  gains  of  $180  million  reflecting  gains 
on  the  sale  of  Eskay  Creek  ($59  million),  Massawa  ($54  million), 
Morila ($27 million), and Bullfrog ($22 million). Refer to note 4 to the 
Financial Statements for more information. This was combined with 
a  gain  of  $104  million  on  the  remeasurement  of  the  residual  cash 
liability  relating  to  our  silver  sale  agreement  with  Wheaton.  This 
was partially offset by care and maintenance expenses at Porgera 
of $51 million and donations made to our host communities relating 
to the Covid-19 pandemic. 

For  a  further  breakdown  of  other  expense  (income),  refer  to 

note 9 to the Financial Statements.

Income Tax Expense
Income  tax  expense  was  $1,344  million  in  2021.  The  unadjusted 
effective  income  tax  rate  for  2021  was  29%  of  the  income  before 
income taxes.

The  underlying  effective  income  tax  rate  on  ordinary  income 
for 2021 was 27% after adjusting for the impact of net impairment 
reversals;  the  impact  of  deferred  taxes  at  Hemlo;  the  impact  of 
the  sale  of  long-lived  assets;  the  impact  of  the  settlement  of  the 
Massawa  Senegalese  Tax  Dispute;  the  impact  of  tax  reform 
measures  in Argentina;  the  impact  of  foreign  currency  translation 
gains  and  losses  on  tax  balances;  the  impact  of  non-deductible 
foreign  exchange  losses;  the  impact  of  the  Porgera  mine  being 
placed  on  care  and  maintenance;  the  impact  of  the  recognition 
and de-recognition of deferred tax assets; and the impact of other 
expense adjustments.

We  record  deferred  tax  charges  or  credits  if  changes  in  facts 
or  circumstances  affect  the  estimated  tax  basis  of  assets  and 
therefore,  the  expectations  in  our  ability  to  realize  deferred  tax 
assets.  The  interpretation  of  tax  regulations  and  legislation  as 
well  as  their  application  to  our  business  is  complex  and  subject 
to  change.  We  have  significant  amounts  of  deferred  tax  assets, 
including  tax  loss  carry  forwards,  and  also  deferred  tax  liabilities. 
We  also  have  significant  amounts  of  unrecognized  deferred  tax 
assets (e.g. for tax losses in Canada). Potential changes in any of 
these amounts, as well as our ability to realize deferred tax assets, 
could significantly affect net income or cash flow in future periods. 
For  further  details  on  income  tax  expense,  refer  to  note  12  to  the 
Financial Statements.

RECONCILIATION TO CANADIAN  
STATUTORY RATE

For the years ended

At 26.5% statutory rate

12/31/21

12/31/20

1,228

1,311

Increase (decrease) due to:
Allowances and special tax deductionsa
Impact of foreign tax ratesb
Expenses not tax deductible

Taxable gains on sales of long-lived assets
Net currency translation (gains) losses on  
  current and deferred tax balances
Tax impact from pass-through entities  
  and equity accounted investments

Current year tax gains not recognized
Recognition and de-recognition of  
  deferred tax assets

Adjustments in respect of prior years
Increase to income tax related  
  contingent liabilities

Impact of tax rate changes

Withholding taxes

Mining taxes
Tax impact of amounts recognized  
  within accumulated OCI

Other items

Income tax expense

(138)
(84)

118

24

23

(330)

(18)

(31)

24

19

66

110

323

8

2

(151)
(32)

154

0

(19)

(309)

(9)

(61)

(53)

42

1

100

383

(21)

(4)

1,344

1,332

a.   We  are  able  to  claim  certain  allowances,  incentives  and  tax  deductions 

unique to extractive industries that result in a lower effective tax rate.

b.   We operate in multiple foreign tax jurisdictions that have tax rates different 

than the Canadian statutory rate.

The more significant items impacting income tax expense in 2021 
and 2020 include the following:

Currency Translation
Deferred tax balances are subject to remeasurement for changes in 
Current and deferred tax balances are subject to remeasurement for 
changes in currency exchange rates each period. This is required in 
countries where tax is paid in local currency and the subsidiary has 
a different functional currency (e.g. US dollars). The most significant 
balances relate to Argentine and Malian tax liabilities.

In  2021,  a  tax  expense  of  $23  million  arose  from  translation 
losses on tax balances, mainly due to the weakening of the Argentine 
peso and the West African CFA franc against the US dollar. In 2020, 
a tax recovery of $19 million arose from translation losses and gains 
on  tax  balances  due  to  the  weakening  of  the Argentine  peso  and 
strengthening  of  the  West African  CFA  franc,  respectively,  against 
the  US  dollar.  These  net  translation  losses  (gains)  are  included 
within income tax expense (recovery).

106

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
Withholding Taxes
In  2021,  we  have  recorded  $66  million  of  dividend  withholding 
taxes  related  to  the  undistributed  earnings  of  our  subsidiaries  in 
Argentina,  Côte  d’Ivoire,  Saudi Arabia  and  the  United  States.  We 
have also recorded $33 million (2020: $87 million, related to Côte 
d’Ivoire,  Tanzania  and  the  United  States)  of  dividend  withholding 
taxes  related  to  the  distributed  earnings  of  our  subsidiaries  in 
Argentina, Saudi Arabia and the United States.

Accounting for Joint Ventures and Associates
Nevada Gold Mines is a limited liability company treated as a flow 
through  partnership  for  US  tax  purposes.  The  partnership  is  not 
subject  to  federal  income  tax  directly,  but  each  of  its  partners  is 
liable for tax on its share of the profits of the partnership. As such, 
Barrick accounts for its current and deferred income tax associated 
with the investment (61.5% share) following the principles in IAS 12. 

FINANCIAL CONDITION REVIEW

SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET AND KEY FINANCIAL RATIOS
($ millions, except ratios and share amounts)

As at December 31

Total cash and equivalents

Current assets

Non-current assets

Total Assets

Current liabilities excluding short-term debt
Non-current liabilities excluding long-term debta

Debt (current and long-term)

Total Liabilities

Total shareholders’ equity

Non-controlling interests

Total Equity

Total common shares outstanding (millions of shares)

Key Financial Ratios:

Current ratiob
Debt-to-equityc

Mining Taxes
Nevada Gold Mines is subject to a Net Proceeds of Minerals tax in 
Nevada at a rate of 5% and the tax expense recorded in 2021 was 
$136  million  (2020:  $149  million).  Other  significant  mining  taxes 
include the Dominican Republic’s Net Profits Interest tax, which is 
determined  based  on  cash  flows  as  defined  by  the  Pueblo  Viejo 
Special  Lease  Agreement.  A  tax  expense  of  $180  million  (2020: 
$212 million) was recorded for this in 2021. Both taxes are included 
on a consolidated basis in the Company’s consolidated statements 
of income.

2021

5,280

2,969

38,641

46,890

2,071

7,362

5,150

14,583

23,857

8,450

32,307

1,779

3.95:1

0.16:1

2020

5,188

2,955

38,363

46,506

2,200

7,441

5,155

14,796

23,341

8,369

31,710

1,778

3.67:1

0.16:1

2019

3,314

3,573

37,505

44,392

2,001

7,028

5,536

14,565

21,432

8,395

29,827

1,778

2.90:1

0.19:1

a.  Non-current financial liabilities as at December 31, 2021 were $5,578 million (2020: $5,486 million; 2019: $5,559 million).
b.   Represents current assets (excluding assets held-for-sale) divided by current liabilities (including short-term debt and excluding liabilities held-for-sale) as at 

December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

c.  Represents debt divided by total shareholders’ equity (including minority interest) as at December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019.

Balance Sheet Review
Total  assets  were  $46.9  billion  at  December  31,  2021,  slightly 
higher than total assets at December 31, 2020. 

Our  asset  base  is  primarily  comprised  of  non-current  assets 
such  as  property,  plant  and  equipment  and  goodwill,  reflecting 
the capital-intensive nature of the mining business and our history 
of  growth  through  acquisitions.  Other  significant  assets  include 
production  inventories,  indirect  taxes  recoverable  and  receivable, 
concentrate  sales  receivables,  other  government  transaction  and 
joint venture related receivables, and cash and equivalents. 

Total  liabilities  at  December  31,  2021  were  $14.6  billion,  
slightly  lower  than  total  liabilities  at  December  31,  2020.  Our 
liabilities  are  primarily  comprised  of  debt,  other  non-current 
liabilities such as provisions and deferred income tax liabilities, and 
accounts payable.

Shareholders’ Equity

February 8, 2022

Common shares

Stock options

Number of shares

1,779,331,037

–

Financial Position and Liquidity
We  believe  we  have  sufficient  financial  resources  to  meet  our 
business requirements for the foreseeable future, including capital 
expenditures,  working  capital  requirements,  interest  payments, 
share  buybacks  and  dividends. To  date,  we  have  not  experienced 
significant negative impacts to liquidity as a result of the Covid-19 
pandemic.  During  2021,  our  cash  balance  benefited  from  strong 
cash  flow  from  operating  activities  and  cash  exceeded  debt  as  at 
December 31, 2021, for the second year in a row, despite a record 
$1.4 billion in cash returns paid to shareholders in 2021, inclusive 
of a $750 million return of capital distribution.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 107

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
Total  cash  and  cash  equivalents  as  at  December  31,  2021 
were  $5.3  billion.  This  cash  and  cash  equivalents  balance  does 
not include cash held by our equity method investments, including 
approximately $500 million (our share) at Kibali. The cash and cash 
equivalents held at Kibali are subject to various steps before they 
can  be  distributed  to  the  joint  venture  shareholders  and  are  held 
across three banks in the Democratic Republic of Congo, including 
two  domestic  banks.  Our  capital  structure  comprises  a  mix  of 
debt,  non-controlling  interest  (primarily  at  Nevada  Gold  Mines) 
and shareholders’ equity. As at December 31, 2021, our total debt 
was  $5.2  billion  (debt  net  of  cash  and  equivalents  was  negative  
$130 million) and our debt-to-equity ratio was 0.16:1. This compares 
to debt as at December 31, 2020 of $5.2 billion (debt, net of cash 
and  cash  equivalents  was  negative  $33  million),  and  a  debt-to-
equity ratio of 0.16:1. 

In  2022,  we  have  capital  commitments  of  $425  million 
and  expect  to  incur  attributable  sustaining  and  project  capital 
expenditures6  of  approximately  $1,900  to  $2,200  million  in  2022 
based  on  our  guidance  range  on  page  63.  In  2022,  we  have  
$308 million in interest payments and other amounts as detailed in 
the table on page 110. In addition, we have contractual obligations 
and  commitments  of  $658  million  in  purchase  obligations  for 
supplies and consumables. We expect to fund these commitments 
through operating cash flow, which is our primary source of liquidity, 
as well as existing cash balances.

Our  operating  cash  flow  is  dependent  on  the  ability  of  our 
operations  to  deliver  projected  future  cash  flows.  The  market 
prices  of  gold,  and  to  a  lesser  extent  copper,  are  the  primary 
drivers  of  our  operating  cash  flow.  Other  options  to  enhance 
liquidity  include  further  portfolio  optimization  and  the  creation  of 
new  joint  ventures  and  partnerships;  issuance  of  equity  securities 
in  the  public  markets  or  to  private  investors,  which  could  be 
undertaken  for  liquidity  enhancement  and/or  in  connection  with 
establishing  a  strategic  partnership;  issuance  of  long-term  debt 
securities  in  the  public  markets  or  to  private  investors  (Moody’s 
and  S&P  currently  rate  Barrick’s  outstanding  long-term  debt  as 
investment  grade,  with  ratings  of  Baa1  and  BBB,  respectively); 
and drawing on the $3.0 billion available under our undrawn Credit 
Facility  (subject  to  compliance  with  covenants  and  the  making  of 
certain representations and warranties, this facility is available for 
drawdown  as  a  source  of  financing).  In  May  2021,  we  amended 
the  credit  and  guarantee  agreement  (the  “Credit  Facility”)  with 
certain  Lenders,  which  requires  such  Lenders  to  make  available 
to  us  a  credit  facility  of  $3.0  billion  or  the  equivalent  amount  in 
Canadian dollars. The Credit Facility, which is unsecured, currently 
has  an  interest  rate  of  London  Interbank  Offered  Rate  (“LIBOR”) 
plus  1.125%  on  drawn  amounts,  and  a  standby  rate  of  0.11%  on 
undrawn amounts. The Credit Facility also includes terms to replace 
LIBOR with a suitable replacement once that matter is resolved. As 
part  of  the  amendment,  the  termination  date  of  the  Credit  Facility 
was extended from January 2025 to May 2026. The Credit Facility 
was undrawn as at December 31, 2021. The key financial covenant 
in our undrawn credit facility requires Barrick to maintain a net debt 
to  total  capitalization  ratio  of  less  than  0.60:1.  Barrick’s  net  debt 
to  total  capitalization  ratio  was  0.00:1  as  at  December  31,  2021 
(0.00:1 as at December 31, 2020).

Summary of Cash Inflow (Outflow)

($ millions)

For the  
three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

Net cash provided 
  by operating  
  activities

Investing activities
Capital  
  expenditures
Investment  

(purchases)  

  sales
Cash acquired  
in Merger

Divestitures
Dividends received 

from equity 

  method  

investments

Other

Total investing 
(outflows)  
inflows

Financing activities
Net change  
in debta
Dividendsb
Return of Capital
Net disbursements 
to non-controlling 
interests

Other

Total financing 
  outflows
Effect of  
  exchange rate

Increase   

(decrease) 
in cash and 
  equivalents

1,387

1,050

4,378

5,417

2,833

(669)

(569)

(2,435)

(2,054)

(1,701)

(46)

0

8

306

14

0

0

0

53

17

(46)

0

27

520

37

220

0

283

141

124

0

751

750

217

33

(387)

(499)

(1,897)

(1,286)

50

(5)

(159)

(250)

(5)

(158)

(250)

(27)

(634)

(750)

(379)

(547)

0

(309)

(548)

0

(363)

14

(270)

(1,092)

(1,356)

37

115

28

(281)

(1)

(763)

(646)

(2,388)

(2,254)

(1,139)

0

0

(1)

(3)

(1)

237

(95)

92

1,874

1,743

a.   The  difference  between  the  net  change  in  debt  on  a  cash  basis  and  
the  net  change  on  the  balance  sheet  is  due  to  changes  in  non-cash 
charges, specifically the unwinding of discounts and amortization of debt 
issue costs.

b.   For  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  we  declared 
and  paid  dividends  per  share  in  US  dollars  totaling  $0.09  and  $0.36, 
respectively  (September  30,  2021:  declared  and  paid  $0.09;  2020: 
declared and paid $0.31; 2019: declared $0.13 and paid $0.20, and also 
paid $2.69 per share to Randgold shareholders).

108

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Q4 2021 compared to Q3 2021
In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  we  generated  $1,387  million  in 
operating cash flow, compared to $1,050 million in the prior quarter. 
The increase of $337 million was primarily due to lower cash taxes 
paid, combined with an increase in realized gold and copper prices6 
as  well  as  higher  gold  and  copper  sales  volumes.  Operating  cash 
flow was further impacted by lower cost of sales per ounce/pound7. 
These  impacts  were  partially  offset  by  an  unfavorable  movement 
in working capital, mainly in other current assets and receivables, 
which was partially offset by a favorable movement in inventory. 

Cash  outflows  from  investing  activities  in  the  fourth  quarter 
of  2021  were  $387  million,  compared  to  $499  million  in  the  prior 
quarter. The decreased outflow was primarily due to an increase in 
dividends  from  our  equity  method  investments,  partially  offset  by 
an  increase  in  capital  expenditures.  Cash  outflows  from  investing 
activities was further impacted by the purchase of i-80 Gold shares 
by NGM pursuant to the Exchange Agreement to acquire the 40% 
interest in South Arturo that NGM did not already own in exchange 
for the Lone Tree and Buffalo Mountain properties and infrastructure.
Net  financing  cash  outflows  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021 
amounted  to  $763  million,  compared  to  $646  million  in  the  prior 
quarter. The increase of $117 million is primarily due to an increase 
in disbursements to non-controlling interests, primarily to Newmont 
in relation to their interest in Nevada Gold Mines. 

from 

Cash  outflows 

investing  activities 

2021 compared to 2020
In  2021,  we  generated  $4,378  million  in  operating  cash  flow, 
compared to $5,417 million in the prior year. The decrease of $1,039 
million was primarily due to higher cash taxes paid, lower gold and 
copper  sales  volumes  and  higher  cost  of  sales  per  ounce/pound7. 
This was partially offset by higher realized gold and copper prices6. 
for  2021  were  
$1,897  million  compared  to  $1,286  million  in  the  prior  year.  The 
increased outflow of $611 million was primarily due to an increase 
in  capital  expenditures,  namely  the  Pueblo  Viejo  plant  expansion 
and  mine  life  extension  project,  as  well  as  the  development  of 
the  third  underground  mine  and  expansion  of  power  capacity  at 
Loulo-Gounkoto.  This  was  combined  with  cash  proceeds  of  $283 
million  from  the  sale  of  Massawa  as  well  as  net  investment  sales 
of  $220  million  mainly  from  the  sale  of  shares  in  Shandong  Gold, 
both occurring in the prior year. These impacts were partially offset 
by higher dividends received from our equity method investments, 
specifically Jabal Sayid, Zaldívar and Kibali, in the current year.

Net  financing  cash  outflows  for  2021  amounted  to  $2,388 
million,  compared  to  $2,254  million  in  the  prior  year.  The  higher 
outflow  of  $134  million  is  primarily  due  to  the  payment  of  the  
$750 million return of capital distribution in 2021 and higher dividends 
paid,  reflecting  Barrick’s  continued  strong  financial  performance. 
This  was  partially  offset  by  the  make-whole  repurchase  of  the 
outstanding $337 million of principal of our 3.85% notes due 2022 
in January 2020 and a decrease in disbursements to non-controlling 
interests, primarily to Newmont in relation to their interest in Nevada 
Gold Mines, in the current year. 

Summary of Financial Instrumentsa
As at December 31, 2021

Financial Instrument

Principal/Notional Amount

 Associated Risks

Cash and equivalents

Accounts receivable 

Other investments

Accounts payable

Debt

Restricted share units

Deferred share units

$5,280 million

	Q Interest rate
	Q Credit

$623 million

$414 million

	Q Credit
	Q Market

	Q Market
	Q Liquidity

$1,448 million

	Q Liquidity

$5,176 million

	Q Interest rate

$31 million

	Q Market

$13 million

	Q Market

a.   Refer to notes 25, 26 and 28 to the Financial Statements for more information regarding financial instruments, fair value measurements and financial risk 

management, respectively.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 109

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation and Claims
We are currently subject to various litigation proceedings as disclosed 
in  note  35  to  the  Financial  Statements,  and  we  may  be  involved  in 
disputes  with  other  parties  in  the  future  that  may  result  in  litigation. 
If  we  are  unable  to  resolve  these  disputes  favorably,  it  may  have  a 
material  adverse  impact  on  our  financial  condition,  cash  flow  and 
results of operations.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments
In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts that give 
rise  to  commitments  for  future  minimum  payments.  The  following 
table  summarizes  the  remaining  contractual  maturities  of  our 
financial  liabilities  and  operating  and  capital  commitments  shown 
on an undiscounted basis:

($ millions)

Debta

Repayment of principal

Capital leases

Interest

Provisions for environmental rehabilitationb

Restricted share units

Pension benefits and other  
  post-retirement benefits
Minimum royalty paymentsc

Purchase obligations for supplies  
  and consumablesd
Capital commitmentse
Social development costsf
Other obligationsg

Total

Payments due as at December 31, 2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027 and 
thereafter

0

15

308

254

24

4

1

658

425

14

9

1,712

0

12

307

155

7

4

2

188

18

12

17

722

0

5

306

101

0

4

2

149

0

10

17

594

12

5

306

96

0

4

2

139

0

10

17

591

47

3

304

96

0

4

2

134

0

9

17

616

5,050

27

3,836

1,927

0

41

1

450

0

64

348

Total

5,109

67

5,367

2,629

31

61

10

1,718

443

119

425

11,744

15,979

a.   Debt and Interest – Our debt obligations do not include any subjective acceleration clauses or other clauses that enable the holder of the debt to call for early 
repayment, except in the event that we breach any of the terms and conditions of the debt or for other customary events of default. We are not required to 
post any collateral under any debt obligations. Projected interest payments on variable rate debt were based on interest rates in effect at December 31, 2021. 
Interest is calculated on our long-term debt obligations using both fixed and variable rates.

b.   Provisions for environmental rehabilitation – Amounts presented in the table represent the undiscounted uninflated future payments for the expected cost of 

provisions for environmental rehabilitation.

c.  Minimum royalty payments are related to continuing operations and are presented net of recoverable amounts.
d.   Purchase obligations for supplies and consumables – Includes commitments related to new purchase obligations to secure supply of acid, tires and cyanide 

for our production process.

e.  Capital commitments – Purchase obligations for capital expenditures include only those items where binding commitments have been entered into.  
f.  Social development costs – Includes a commitment of $14 million in 2027 and thereafter related to the funding of a power transmission line in Argentina.
g.  Other obligations includes the Pueblo Viejo JV partner shareholder loan and the deposit on the Pascua-Lama silver sale agreement with Wheaton. 

REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

Quarterly Informationa

2021

2020

($ millions, except where indicated)

Revenues
Realized price per ounce – goldb
Realized price per pound – copperb

Cost of sales

Net earnings

Per share (dollars)c
Adjusted net earningsb
Per share (dollars)b,c

Q4

3,310

1,793

4.63

1,905

726

0.41

626

0.35

Q3

2,826

1,771

3.98

1,768

347

0.20

419

0.24

Operating cash flow
Cash consolidated capital expendituresd
Free cash flowb

1,387

1,050

669

718

569

481

Q2

2,893

1,820

4.57

1,704

411

0.23

513

0.29

639

658

(19)

Q1

2,956

1,777

4.12

1,712

538

0.30

507

0.29

1,302

539

763

Q4

3,279

1,871

3.39

1,814

685

0.39

616

0.35

1,638

546

1,092

Q3

3,540

1,926

3.28

1,927

882

0.50

726

0.41

1,859

548

1,311

Q2

3,055

1,725

2.79

1,900

357

0.20

415

0.23

1,031

509

522

Q1

2,721

1,589

2.23

1,776

400

0.22

285

0.16

889

451

438

a.  Sum of all the quarters may not add up to the annual total due to rounding.
b.  Further information on these non-GAAP financial measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included on pages 111 to 137 of this MD&A.
c.  Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.
d.  Amounts presented on a consolidated cash basis.

110

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
Our recent financial results reflect our emphasis on cost discipline, 
an  agile  management  structure  that  empowers  our  site  based 
leadership  teams  and  a  portfolio  of  Tier  One  Gold  Assets1.  This, 
combined with rising gold and copper prices, has resulted in stronger 
operating  cash  flows.  The  positive  free  cash  flow6  generated, 
together with the proceeds from various divestitures, have allowed 
us  to  continue  to  strengthen  our  balance  sheet  over  the  past  two 
years and to increase returns to shareholders. 

These same fundamentals have also driven higher net earnings 
in  recent  quarters.  Net  earnings  has  also  been  impacted  by  the 
following  items  in  each  quarter  which  have  been  excluded  from 
adjusted net earnings6. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we recorded a 
gain of $118 million (net of tax and non-controlling interest) related 
to  the  disposition  of  Lone  Tree.  In  the  first  quarter  of  2021,  we 
recorded a net impairment reversal of $86 million (no tax impact) at 
Lagunas Norte resulting from the agreement to sell our 100% interest 
of the mine to Boroo. In the first quarter of 2020, we recorded a net 
impairment  reversal  of  $115  million  (net  of  tax  effects),  resulting 
from the agreement with the Government of Tanzania being signed 
and made effective in that quarter. 

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL 
REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS  
AND PROCEDURES
Management  is  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining 
adequate  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  and  disclosure 
controls and procedures. Internal control over financial reporting is 
a framework designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding 
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial 
statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  IFRS.  The 
Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  framework 
includes  those  policies  and  procedures  that  (i)  pertain  to  the 
maintenance  of  records  that,  in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and 
fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and  dispositions  of  the  assets  of  the 
Company;  (ii)  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are 
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements 
in accordance with IFRS, and that receipts and expenditures of the 
Company  are  being  made  only  in  accordance  with  authorizations 
of  management  and  directors  of  the  Company;  and  (iii)  provide 
reasonable  assurance  regarding  prevention  or  timely  detection  of 
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets 
that  could  have  a  material  effect  on  the  Company’s  consolidated 
financial statements.

Disclosure controls and procedures form a broader framework 
designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  other  financial 
information disclosed publicly fairly presents in all material respects 
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the 
Company  for  the  periods  presented  in  this  MD&A  and  Barrick’s 
Annual Report. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures 
framework  includes  processes  designed  to  ensure  that  material 
information  relating  to  the  Company,  including  its  consolidated 
subsidiaries, is made known to management by others within those 
entities to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Together,  the  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  and 
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  frameworks  provide  internal 
control  over  financial  reporting  and  disclosure.  Due  to  its  inherent 
limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  and  disclosure 
may  not  prevent  or  detect  all  misstatements.  Further, 
the 
effectiveness  of  internal  control  is  subject  to  the  risk  that  controls 
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that 
the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may change.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over 
financial  reporting  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021  that 
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, 
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The  management  of  Barrick,  at  the  direction  of  our  President 
and  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Senior  Executive  Vice-President, 
Chief  Financial  Officer,  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  design 
and  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  the 
end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  the  framework 
and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework 
(2013)  as  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations 
of  the  Treadway  Commission  (COSO).  Based  on  that  evaluation, 
management  concluded  that  the  Company’s  internal  control  over 
financial reporting was effective as at December 31, 2021.

Barrick’s  annual  management  report  on  internal  control  over 
financial reporting and the integrated audit report of Barrick’s auditors 
for the year ended December 31, 2021 will be included in Barrick’s 
2021  Annual  Report  and  its  2021  Form  40-F/Annual  Information 
Form on file with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and 
Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities.

IFRS CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES  
AND ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Management  has  discussed  the  development  and  selection  of  
our  critical  accounting  estimates  with  the Audit  &  Risk  Committee 
of  the  Board  of  Directors,  and  the  Audit  &  Risk  Committee  has 
reviewed  the  disclosure  relating  to  such  estimates  in  conjunction 
with its review of this MD&A. The accounting policies and methods 
we  utilize  determine  how  we  report  our  financial  condition  and 
results  of  operations,  and  they  may  require  Management  to  make 
estimates or rely on assumptions about matters that are inherently 
financial  statements  have  been 
uncertain.  The  consolidated 
prepared  in  accordance  with  IFRS  as  issued  by  the  International 
Accounting  Standards  Board  (“IASB”)  under  the  historical  cost 
convention,  as  modified  by  revaluation  of  certain  financial  assets, 
derivative  contracts  and  post-retirement  assets.  Our  significant 
accounting  policies  are  disclosed  in  note  2  to  the  Financial 
Statements, including a summary of current and future changes in 
accounting policies.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
Certain accounting estimates have been identified as being “critical” 
to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations 
because  they  require  us  to  make  subjective  and/or  complex 
judgments  about  matters  that  are  inherently  uncertain;  or  there  is 
a  reasonable  likelihood  that  materially  different  amounts  could  be 
reported  under  different  conditions  or  using  different  assumptions 
and  estimates.  Our  significant  accounting  judgments,  estimates  
and  assumptions  are  disclosed  in  note  3  to  the  accompanying 
Financial Statements.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 
MEASURES
Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net  
Earnings per Share
Adjusted  net  earnings  is  a  non-GAAP  financial  measure  which 
excludes the following from net earnings:

	Q Impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, 

property, plant and equipment, and investments;

	Q Acquisition/disposition gains/losses;
	Q Foreign currency translation gains/losses;
	Q Significant tax adjustments; and
	Q Tax effect and non-controlling interest of the above items.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 111

Management’s Discussion and Analysisfor 

the 

Management  uses  this  measure  internally  to  evaluate  our 
reporting  periods 
underlying  operating  performance 
presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future 
operating results. Management believes that adjusted net earnings 
is  a  useful  measure  of  our  performance  because  impairment 
charges,  acquisition/disposition  gains/losses  and  significant  tax 
adjustments  do  not  reflect  the  underlying  operating  performance 
of  our  core  mining  business  and  are  not  necessarily  indicative  of 
future  operating  results.  Furthermore,  foreign  currency  translation 
gains/losses  are  not  necessarily  reflective  of  the  underlying 
operating results for the reporting periods presented. The tax effect 
and non-controlling interest of the adjusting items are also excluded 
to  reconcile  the  amounts  to  Barrick’s  share  on  a  post-tax  basis, 
consistent with net earnings.
As  noted,  we  use 

internal  purposes. 
this  measure 
Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance 
do  not  reflect  the  types  of  items  we  adjust  for.  Consequently, 
the  presentation  of  adjusted  net  earnings  enables  investors 

for 

to  better  understand 

and  analysts 
the  underlying  operating 
performance  of  our  core  mining  business  through  the  eyes  of 
management. Management periodically evaluates the components 
of  adjusted  net  earnings  based  on  an  internal  assessment  of 
performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating  
performance  of  our  business  segments  and  a  review  of  the  non-
GAAP  financial  measures  used  by  mining  industry  analysts  and 
other mining companies.

is 

intended 

Adjusted  net  earnings 

to  provide  additional 
information  only  and  does  not  have  any  standardized  definition 
under  IFRS  and  should  not  be  considered  in  isolation  or  as  a 
substitute  for  measures  of  performance  prepared  in  accordance 
with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating 
profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other 
companies may calculate these measures differently. The following 
table  reconciles  these  non-GAAP  financial  measures  to  the  most 
directly comparable IFRS measure.

RECONCILIATION OF NET EARNINGS TO NET EARNINGS PER SHARE, ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS AND 
ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars)

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

For the three months ended

For the years ended

Net earnings attributable to equity holders of the Company
Impairment charges (reversals) related to long-lived assetsa
Acquisition/disposition gainsb
Loss on currency translation
Significant tax adjustmentsc
Other expense (income) adjustmentsd
Tax effect and non-controlling intereste
Adjusted net earnings
Net earnings per sharef
Adjusted net earnings per sharef

726

14

(198)

13

(29)

36

64

626

0.41

0.35

347

10

(5)

5

45

12

5

419

0.20

0.24

2,022

(63)

(213)

29

125

73

92

2,065

1.14

1.16

2,324

(269)

(180)

50

(119)

71

165

2,042

1.31

1.15

3,969

(1,423)

(2,327)

109

34

(687)

1,227

902

2.26

0.51

a.   Net impairment reversals primarily relate to non-current asset reversals at Lagunas Norte in the current year and primarily relate to our Tanzanian assets in 

the prior year. 

b.   Acquisition/disposition gains for the current year primarily relate to the gain on the sale of Lone Tree in the fourth quarter of 2021, while the prior year mainly 

relates to the gains on the sale of Eskay Creek, Massawa, Morila and Bullfrog. 

c.   Significant tax adjustments in the current year primarily relate to deferred tax expense as a result of tax reform measures in Argentina, the foreign exchange 
impact on current tax expense in Peru and the remeasurement of current and deferred tax balances, the acquisition of the 40% interest in South Arturo that 
NGM did not already own, the sale of Lagunas Norte, the settlement of the Massawa Senegalese tax dispute and the recognition/derecognition of our deferred 
taxes in various jurisdictions. In 2020, significant tax adjustments primarily relate to deferred tax recoveries as a result of tax reform measures in Argentina 
and adjustments made in recognition of the net settlement of all outstanding disputes with the Government of Tanzania. 

d.   Other expense adjustments for both the current and prior year primarily relate to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera. The current year periods were 
also impacted by a $25 million litigation settlement. The prior year was further impacted by the impact of changes in the discount rate assumptions on our 
closed mine rehabilitation provision and donations related to Covid-19, partially offset by the gain on the remeasurement of the residual cash liability relating 
to our silver sale agreement with Wheaton. 

e.  Tax effect and non-controlling interest for the current year primarily relates to acquisition/disposition gains.
f.  Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.

Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow is a measure that deducts capital expenditures from 
net cash provided by operating activities. Management believes this 
to be a useful indicator of our ability to operate without reliance on 
additional borrowing or usage of existing cash.

Free  cash  flow  is  intended  to  provide  additional  information 
only  and  does  not  have  any  standardized  definition  under  IFRS, 
and  should  not  be  considered  in  isolation  or  as  a  substitute  for 
measures  of  performance  prepared  in  accordance  with  IFRS. The 
measure is not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow 
from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may 
calculate this measure differently. The following table reconciles this 
non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

RECONCILIATION OF NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES TO FREE CASH FLOW 

($ millions)

Net cash provided by operating activities

Capital expenditures

Free cash flow

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

1,387

(669)

718

1,050

(569)

481

4,378

(2,435)

1,943

5,417

(2,054)

3,363

2,833

(1,701)

1,132

112

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisCapital Expenditures
Starting  with  this  MD&A,  we  have  included  minesite  sustaining 
capital expenditures and project capital expenditures as non-GAAP 
financial measures. Capital expenditures are classified into minesite 
sustaining  capital  expenditures  or  project  capital  expenditures 
depending  on  the  nature  of  the  expenditure.  Minesite  sustaining 
capital  expenditures  is  the  capital  spending  required  to  support 
current  production  levels.  Project  capital  expenditures  represent 
the capital spending at new projects and major, discrete projects at 
existing operations intended to increase net present value through 
higher production or longer mine life. Management believes this to 
be a useful indicator of the purpose of capital expenditures and this 
distinction is an input into the calculation of all-in sustaining costs 
per ounce and all-in costs per ounce.

Classifying capital expenditures is intended to provide additional 
information only and does not have any standardized definition under 
IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute 
for  measures  of  performance  prepared  in  accordance  with  IFRS. 
Other  companies  may  calculate  these  measures  differently.  The 
following  table  reconciles  these  non-GAAP  financial  measures  to 
the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

RECONCILIATION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 

($ millions)

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Project capital expenditures

Capitalized interest

Total consolidated capital expenditures

Total cash costs per ounce, All-in sustaining costs 
per ounce, All-in costs per ounce, C1 cash costs 
per pound and All-in sustaining costs per pound
Total  cash  costs  per  ounce,  all-in  sustaining  costs  per  ounce  and 
all-in costs per ounce are non-GAAP financial measures which are 
calculated  based  on  the  definition  published  by  the  World  Gold 
Council  (a  market  development  organization  for  the  gold  industry 
comprised of and funded by gold mining companies from around the 
world, including Barrick, the “WGC”). The WGC is not a regulatory 
organization.  Management  uses  these  measures  to  monitor  the 
performance of our gold mining operations and its ability to generate 
positive  cash  flow,  both  on  an  individual  site  basis  and  an  overall 
company basis.

Total  cash  costs  start  with  our  cost  of  sales  related  to  gold 
production  and  removes  depreciation,  the  non-controlling  interest 
of  cost  of  sales  and  includes  by-product  credits.  All-in  sustaining 
costs  start  with  total  cash  costs  and  includes  minesite  sustaining 
capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general and administrative 
costs,  minesite  exploration  and  evaluation  costs  and  reclamation 
cost accretion and amortization. These additional costs reflect the 
expenditures made to maintain current production levels.

All-in costs starts with all-in sustaining costs and adds additional 
costs that reflect the varying costs of producing gold over the life-
cycle  of  a  mine,  including:  project  capital  expenditures  (capital 
spending  at  new  projects  and  major,  discrete  projects  at  existing 
operations  intended  to  increase  net  present  value  through  higher 
production  or  longer  mine  life)  and  other  non-sustaining  costs 
(primarily non-sustaining leases, exploration and evaluation costs, 
community  relations  costs  and  general  and  administrative  costs 
that are not associated with current operations). These definitions 
recognize  that  there  are  different  costs  associated  with  the  life-
cycle  of  a  mine,  and  that  it  is  therefore  appropriate  to  distinguish 
between sustaining and non-sustaining costs.

We believe that our use of total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs 
and all-in costs will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders 
of  Barrick  in  understanding  the  costs  associated  with  producing 
gold,  understanding  the  economics  of  gold  mining,  assessing  our 
operating  performance  and  also  our  ability  to  generate  free  cash 
flow  from  current  operations  and  to  generate  free  cash  flow  on 
an  overall  company  basis.  Due  to  the  capital-intensive  nature  of 

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

431

234
4

669

386

179

4

569

1,673

747
15

2,435

1,559

471

24

2,054

1,320

370

11

1,701

the  industry  and  the  long  useful  lives  over  which  these  items  are 
depreciated,  there  can  be  a  significant  timing  difference  between 
net  earnings  calculated  in  accordance  with  IFRS  and  the  amount 
of  free  cash  flow  that  is  being  generated  by  a  mine  and  therefore 
we believe these measures are useful non-GAAP operating metrics 
and  supplement  our  IFRS  disclosures.  These  measures  are  not 
representative of all of our cash expenditures as they do not include 
income  tax  payments,  interest  costs  or  dividend  payments. These 
measures do not include depreciation or amortization.

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs 
are intended to provide additional information only and do not have 
standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be considered 
in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared 
in accordance with IFRS. These measures are not equivalent to net 
income  or  cash  flow  from  operations  as  determined  under  IFRS. 
Although  the  WGC  has  published  a  standardized  definition,  other 
companies may calculate these measures differently.

In  addition  to  presenting  these  metrics  on  a  by-product  basis, 
we  have  calculated  these  metrics  on  a  co-product  basis.  Our  co-
product  metrics  remove  the  impact  of  other  metal  sales  that  are 
produced  as  a  by-product  of  our  gold  production  from  cost  per 
ounce calculations but does not reflect a reduction in costs for costs 
associated with other metal sales.

C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound 
are  non-GAAP  financial  measures  related  to  our  copper  mine 
operations.  We  believe  that  C1  cash  costs  per  pound  enables 
investors  to  better  understand  the  performance  of  our  copper 
operations  in  comparison  to  other  copper  producers  who  present 
results on a similar basis. C1 cash costs per pound excludes royalties 
and production taxes and non-routine charges as they are not direct 
production costs. All-in sustaining costs per pound is similar to the 
gold  all-in  sustaining  costs  metric  and  management  uses  this  to 
better  evaluate  the  costs  of  copper  production.  We  believe  this 
measure  enables  investors  to  better  understand  the  operating 
performance of our copper mines as this measure reflects all of the 
sustaining  expenditures  incurred  in  order  to  produce  copper.  All-
in  sustaining  costs  per  pound  includes  C1  cash  costs,  sustaining 
capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general and administrative 
costs,  minesite  exploration  and  evaluation  costs,  royalties  and 
production taxes, reclamation cost accretion and amortization and 
write-downs taken on inventory to net realizable value.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 113

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisRECONCILIATION OF GOLD COST OF SALES TO TOTAL CASH COSTS, ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS AND ALL-IN 
COSTS, INCLUDING ON A PER OUNCE BASIS

 ($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

Footnote

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

For the three months ended

For the years ended

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

Depreciation

Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments

By-product credits
Realized losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives
Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Sustaining leases

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other

 All-in sustaining costs

Global exploration and evaluation and project expense

Community relations costs not related to current operations
Project capital expenditures

Non-sustaining leases

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (non-operating sites)

Non-controlling interest and copper operations and other

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

a
b

c

d

e

f

g

h

e

f

g

h

i

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

1,771

(512)

1,601

(475)

52

(70)
0
0

(7)

(351)

883

39

12

431

13

12

51

(86)
0
0

14

(314)

791

27

20

386

9

14

(191)

1,199

(140)

1,107

70

0
234

0

2

(71)

1,434

1,234

1,075

715

753

971

1,009

1,162

1,200

47

0
179

0

4

(53)

1,284

1,071

1,122

739

794

1,034

1,089

1,199

1,254

6,504

(1,889)

217

(285)
0
0

(48)

(1,261)

3,238

151

64

1,673

41

50

(636)

4,581

223

0
747

0

13

(240)

5,324

4,468

1,093

725

765

1,026

1,066

1,192

1,232

6,832

(1,975)

6,514

(1,902)

222

(228)
0
1

(129)

(1,312)

3,411

185

79

1,559

31

46

(594)

4,717

216

1
471

4

10

(157)

5,262

4,879

1,056

699

727

967

995

1,079

1,107

226

(138)
1
(55)

(102)

(878)

3,666

212

69

1,320

27

65

(470)

4,889

273

2
370

0

22

(105)

5,451

5,467

1,005

671

689

894

912

996

1,014

a.  Realized losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives

 Includes realized hedge losses of $nil and $nil for the three months and year ended December 31, 2021, respectively (September 30,  
2021: $nil; 2020: $nil; 2019: $nil), and realized non-hedge losses of $nil and $nil for the three months and year ended December 31, 2021, 
respectively (September 30, 2021: $nil; 2020: $nil; 2019: $1 million). Refer to note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information.

b.  Non-recurring items

 These costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been excluded from the calculation of total cash costs. Non-recurring 
items in 2019 relate to organizational restructuring. 

c.  Other

 Other  adjustments  for  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021  include  the  removal  of  total  cash  costs  and  by-product 
credits associated with Pierina, Golden Sunlight starting in the third quarter of 2019, Morila starting in the third quarter of 2019 up until 
its divestiture in November 2020, Lagunas Norte starting in the fourth quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in June 2021 and Buzwagi 
starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, which are producing incidental ounces, of $7 million and $51 million, respectively (September 30, 
2021: $6 million; 2020: $104 million; 2019: $92 million). 

d.  Non-controlling interests 

 Non-controlling  interests  include  non-controlling  interests  related  to  gold  production  of  $527  million  and  $1,923  million,  respectively, 
for  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021  (September  30,  2021:  $481  million;  2020:  $1,959  million;  2019:  
$1,306 million). Non-controlling interests include Nevada Gold Mines from July 1, 2019, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon; North 
Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi (until September 30, 2019, notwithstanding the completion of the Acacia transaction on September 17, 
2019, we consolidated our interest in Acacia and recorded a non-controlling interest of 36.1% in the income statement for the entirety of 
the third quarter of 2019 as a matter of convenience; and from January 1, 2020 onwards, the date the GoT’s 16% free carried interest 
was made effective). Refer to note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information.

114

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
e.  Exploration and evaluation costs

 Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite if it supports current mine operations and project if it relates to 
future projects. Refer to page 104 of this MD&A.

f.  Capital expenditures

 Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project 
capital expenditures are capital spending at new projects and major, discrete projects at existing operations intended to increase net 
present value through higher production or longer mine life. Significant projects in the current year are the expansion project at Pueblo 
Viejo,  construction  of  the  Third  Shaft  at  Turquoise  Ridge,  the  development  of  the  Gounkoto  underground  and  the  Veladero  Phase  7 
expansion. Refer to page 103 of this MD&A.

g.  Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization

 Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provisions 
of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites.

h.  Non-controlling interest and copper operations

 Removes general & administrative costs related to non-controlling interests and copper based on a percentage allocation of revenue. Also 
removes exploration, evaluation and project expenses, rehabilitation costs and capital expenditures incurred by our copper sites and the 
non-controlling interest of Nevada Gold Mines (including South Arturo) from July 1, 2019, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon; North 
Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi (until September 30, 2019 notwithstanding the completion of the Acacia transaction on September 17,  
2019, we consolidated our interest in Acacia and recorded a non-controlling interest of 36.1% in the income statement for the entirety of 
the third quarter of 2019 as a matter of convenience; and from January 1, 2020 onwards, the date the GoT’s 16% free carried interest 
was  made  effective).  It  also  includes  capital  expenditures  applicable  to  our  equity  method  investment  in  Kibali.  Figures  remove  the 
impact of Pierina, Golden Sunlight starting in the third quarter of 2019, Morila starting in the third quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture 
in November 2020, Lagunas Norte starting in the fourth quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in June 2021 and Buzwagi starting in the 
fourth quarter of 2021. The impact is summarized as the following:

($ millions)

For the three months ended

For the years ended

Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

General & administrative costs

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites)

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

All-in sustaining costs total

Global exploration and evaluation and project costs

Project capital expenditures

All-in costs total

i.  Ounces sold – equity basis

(4)

(2)

(3)

(182)

(191)

(6)

(65)

(71)

(4)

(7)

(4)

(125)

(140)

(4)

(49)

(53)

(21)

(19)

(14)

(582)

(636)

(19)

(221)

(240)

(25)

(25)

(14)

(530)

(594)

(25)

(132)

(157)

(58)

(16)

(13)

(383)

(470)

(54)

(51)

(105)

 Figures remove the impact of Pierina, Golden Sunlight starting in the third quarter of 2019, Morila starting in the third quarter of 2019 
up until its divestiture in November 2020, Lagunas Norte starting in the fourth quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in June 2021 and 
Buzwagi  starting  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021.  Some  of  these  assets  are  producing  incidental  ounces  while  in  closure  or  care  and 
maintenance.

j.  Cost of sales per ounce

 Figures  remove  the  cost  of  sales  impact  of  Pierina  of  $7  million  and  $20  million,  respectively,  for  the  three  months  and  year  ended 
December 31, 2021 (September 30, 2021: $6 million; 2020: $18 million; 2019: $113 million); starting in the third quarter of 2019, Golden 
Sunlight of $nil and $nil, respectively, for the three months and year ended December 31, 2021 (September 30, 2021: $nil; 2020: $nil; 
2019: $1 million); starting in the third quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in November 2020, Morila of $nil and $nil, respectively, for 
the three months and year ended December 31, 2021 (September 30, 2021: $nil; 2020: $22 million; 2019: $23 million); and starting in 
the fourth quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in June 2021, Lagunas Norte of $nil and $37 million, respectively, for the three months 
and  year  ended  December  31,  2021  (September  30,  2021:  $nil;  2020:  $92  million;  2019:  $26  million),  and  Buzwagi  of  $nil  and  $nil, 
respectively,  for  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021  (September  30,  2021:  $nil;  2020:  $nil;  2019:  $nil),  which  are 
producing incidental ounces. Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in 
closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

k.  Per ounce figures

 Cost of sales per ounce, cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on 
amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

l.  Co-product costs per ounce

 Cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis remove the impact 
of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as:

($ millions)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

70

(25)

45

86

(27)

59

285

(108)

177

228

(92)

136

138

(48)

90

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 115

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RECONCILIATION OF GOLD COST OF SALES TO TOTAL CASH COSTS, ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS AND ALL-IN 
COSTS, INCLUDING ON A PER OUNCE BASIS, BY OPERATING SEGMENT

($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

Footnote

Carlina

Cortezb

Turquoise
Ridgec

Long

Canyond Phoenixd

For the three months ended 12/31/21

Nevada 
Gold
 Minese

Hemlo

North 
America

Cost of sales applicable to  
  gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures
Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs
Ounces sold – equity basis  

(000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

434

(82)

0

0

0

(135)

217

0

4

99

2

3

(42)

283

0

0

0

283

297

899

728

729

950

951

950

951

271

(89)

(1)

0

0

(70)

111

0

2

50

0

3

(22)

144

0

29

(11)

162

170

984

657

661

853

857

958

962

163

(51)

(1)

0

0

(43)

68

0

0

23

0

1

(9)

83

0

9

(4)

88

84

1,194

819

821

996

998

1,061

1,063

54

(37)

0

0

0

(6)

11

0

1

3

0

0

(2)

13

0

0

0

13

34

999

325

326

384

385

384

385

87

(21)

(47)

0

1

(8)

12

0

1

6

0

0

(3)

16

0

0

0

16

26

2,047

443

1,533

614

1,704

614

1,704

1,009

(280)

(49)

0

1

(262)

419

0

11

188

2

7

(81)

546

0

33

(13)

566

611

1,023

687

736

893

942

927

976

60

(9)

0

0

0

0

51

0

0

15

0

0

0

66

0

0

0

66

34

1,770

1,481

1,487

1,938

1,944

1,939

1,069

(289)

(49)

0

1

(262)

470

0

11

203

2

7

(81)

612

0

33

(13)

632

645

1,063

729

775

948

994

980

1,945

1,026

116

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the three months ended 12/31/21

Footnote

Pueblo Viejo

Veladero

Latin America &  
Asia Pacific

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Sustaining capital leases

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs
Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g
h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

185

(57)

(12)

0

0

(47)

69

0

1

45

0

2

(20)

97

1

112

(46)

164

113

987

612

677

858

923

1,453

1,518

109

(37)

(1)

0

0

0

71

0

0

22

0

1

0

94

0

6

0

100

83

1,279

834

852

1,113

1,131

1,179

1,197

294

(94)

(13)

0

0

(47)

140

0

1

67

0

3

(20)

191

1

118

(46)

264

196

1,131

707

752

964

1,009

1,332

1,377

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 117

Management’s Discussion and Analysis($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the three months ended 12/31/21

Footnote

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North
 Maram

Tongon Bulyanhulum

Buzwagim,n

Africa & 
Middle East

Cost of sales applicable to  

  gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation and 
project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

181

(72)

0

0

0

(21)

88

0

4

17

0

1

(4)

106

0

46

(9)

143

128

1,139

685

686

822

823

1,109

93

(37)

(1)

0

0

0

55

0

3

12

3

0

0

73

0

7

0

80

95

979

582

586

776

780

844

72

(15)

0

0

0

(9)

48

0

0

28

0

1

(5)

72

0

10

(1)

81

70

79

(15)

(1)

0

0

(6)

57

0

0

3

1

1

(1)

61

0

0

0

61

47

858

679

688

1,033

1,042

1,150

1,494

1,205

1,209

1,301

1,305

1,278

59

(17)

(6)

0

0

(6)

30

0

0

20

0

0

(3)

47

0

17

(3)

61

53

956

567

678

897

1,008

1,159

1,110

848

1,159

1,282

1,270

484

(156)

(8)

0

0

(42)

278

0

7

80

4

3

(13)

359

0

80

(13)

426

393

1,067

705

723

915

933

1,078

1,096

118

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

Footnote

Carlina

Cortezb

Turquoise
Ridgec

Long

Canyond Phoenixd

For the three months ended 9/30/21

Nevada 
Gold
 Minese

Hemlo

North 
America

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital 
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs
Ounces sold – equity basis  

(000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

335

(67)

0

0

0

(104)

164

0

8

91

0

2

(38)

227

0

0

0

227

202

1,017

814

815

1,124

1,125

1,124

240

(75)

(1)

0

0

(63)

101

0

3

51

0

3

(23)

135

0

28

(11)

152

155

(50)

0

0

0

(40)

65

0

1

20

0

0

(8)

78

0

15

(6)

87

126

1,164

800

803

1,065

1,068

1,199

82

1,169

788

792

943

947

1,053

1,125

1,202

1,057

55

(41)

0

0

0

(6)

8

0

1

2

0

0

(1)

10

0

0

0

10

42

796

201

201

251

251

251

251

95

(26)

(51)

0

8

(10)

16

0

0

3

0

1

(1)

19

0

0

0

19

33

1,777

499

1,299

582

1,382

582

880

(259)

(52)

0

8

(223)

354

0

13

171

1

6

(73)

472

0

48

(19)

501

485

1,123

734

790

975

1,031

1,035

54

(11)

(1)

0

0

0

42

0

1

20

1

1

0

65

0

0

0

65

29

1,870

1,493

1,498

2,276

2,281

2,277

934

(270)

(53)

0

8

(223)

396

0

14

191

2

7

(73)

537

0

48

(19)

566

514

1,165

776

829

1,047

1,100

1,103

1,382

1,091

2,282

1,156

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 119

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the three months ended 9/30/21

Footnote

Pueblo Viejo

Veladero

Latin America &  
Asia Pacific

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Sustaining capital leases

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs
Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g
h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

186

(61)

(16)

0

0

(43)

66

0

1

40

0

2

(18)

91

0
81

(32)

140

125

895

521

600

728

807

1,117

1,196

58

(17)

(2)

0

0

0

39

0

1

29

1

0

0

70

0
0

0

70

44

1,315

882

922

1,571

1,611

1,571

1,611

244

(78)

(18)

0

0

(43)

105

0

2

69

1

2

(18)

161

0
81

(32)

210

169

1,038

616

685

960

1,029

1,247

1,316

120

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the three months ended 9/30/21

North
 Maram

Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

Africa & 
Middle East

Footnote

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital 
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

188

(68)

0

0

0

(25)

95

0

5

52

0

1

(11)

142

0

21

(4)

159

134

1,109

708

708

1,056

1,056

1,184

1,184

Kibali

92

(36)

0

0

0

0

56

0

1

11

2

0

0

70

0

8

0

78

93

987

597

601

751

755

838

842

76

(14)

(1)

0

0

(10)

51

0

0

13

0

2

(2)

64

0

9

(2)

71

65

72

(20)

0

0

0

(6)

46

0

1

9

0

0

(1)

55

0

1

0

56

41

993

796

803

985

992

1,105

1,579

1,139

1,143

1,329

1,333

1,344

62

(15)

(5)

0

0

(6)

36

0

0

6

0

0

(1)

41

0

6

(1)

46

49

6

0

0

0

0

(1)

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

5

6

1,073

724

1,000

967

806

827

909

937

976

970

979

970

979

496

(153)

(6)

0

0

(48)

289

0

7

91

2

3

(15)

377

0

45

(7)

415

388

1,104

747

760

970

983

1,071

1,084

1,112

1,348

1,019

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 121

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

Footnote

Carlina

Cortezb

Turquoise
Ridgec

Long

Canyond Phoenixd

For the year ended 12/31/2021

Nevada 
Gold
 Minese

Hemlo

North 
America

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs
Ounces sold – equity basis  

(000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

1,451

(276)

(2)

0

0

(451)

722
0

22

424

2

10

(177)

1,003

0

0

0

1,003

922

968

782

784

1,087

1,089

1,087

927

(294)

(3)

0

0

(243)

387
0

10

192

0

11

(86)

514

0

96

(37)

573

508

1,122

763

767

1,013

1,017

1,129

615

(200)

(5)

0

0

(158)

252
0

1

77

0

1

(30)

301

0

56

(22)

335

337

1,122

749

757

892

900

993

1,089

1,133

1,001

193

(144)

0

0

0

(19)

30
0

4

8

0

1

(5)

38

0

0

0

38

161

739

188

188

238

238

238

238

346

(89)

(194)

0

9

(28)

44
0

1

20

1

2

(9)

59

0

0

0

3,532

(1,003)

(204)

0

9

(899)

1,435
0

41

746

5

25

(318)

1,934

0

158

(61)

257

(45)

(1)

0

0

0

211
0

2

82

2

2

0

299

0

0

0

3,789

(1,048)

(205)

0

9

(899)

1,646
0

43

828

7

27

(318)

2,233

0

158

(61)

59

2,031

299

2,330

111

1,922

398

1,428

533

1,563

533

2,039

1,072

705

764

949

1,008

997

152

1,693

1,388

1,394

1,970

1,976

1,970

2,191

1,115

752

807

1,020

1,075

1,064

1,563

1,056

1,976

1,119

122

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the year ended 12/31/2021

Footnote

Pueblo Viejo

Veladero

Latin America & 
Asia Pacific

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Sustaining capital leases

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs
Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

f

g
h

i

g
h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

739

(234)

(58)

0

0

(178)

269

0

4
160

0

8

(71)

370

1

358

(144)

585

497

896

541

610

745

814

1,178

1,247

262

(85)

(7)

0

0

0

170

0

1
136

1

2

0

310

0

6

0

316

206

1,256

816

850

1,493

1,527

1,520

1,554

1,001

(319)

(65)

0

0

(178)

439

0

5
296

1

10

(71)

680

1

364

(144)

901

703

1,028

622

680

969

1,027

1,282

1,340

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 123

Management’s Discussion and Analysis($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the year ended 12/31/2021

Footnote

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North
 Maram

Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

Africa & 
Middle East

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation and  
  project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

732

(278)

0

0

0

(91)

363

0

18

199

2

4

(44)

542

0

98

(19)

621

558

1,049

650

650

970

970

1,111

1,111

373

(141)

(2)

0

0

0

230

0

5

54

10

1

0

300

0

16

0

316

367

1,016

627

631

818

822

861

865

296

(56)

(2)

0

0

(38)

200

0

0

62

0

6

(11)

257

0

32

(5)

284

257

966

777

784

1,001

1,008

1,105

310

(84)

(1)

0

0

(23)

202

0

3

18

2

1

(3)

223

0

0

0

223

185

1,504

1,093

1,096

1,208

1,211

1,206

212

(57)

(15)

0

0

(22)

118

0

0

34

0

1

(5)

148

0

49

(8)

189

166

1,079

709

787

891

969

1,138

65

(2)

0

0

0

(10)

53

0

0

0

0

0

0

53

0

0

0

53

41

1,334

1,284

1,277

1,291

1,284

1,291

1,112

1,209

1,216

1,284

1,988

(618)

(20)

0

0

(184)

1,166

0

26

367

14

13

(63)

1,523

0

195

(32)

1,686

1,574

1,092

740

751

968

979

1,070

1,081

124

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

Footnote

Carlina

Cortezb

Turquoise
Ridgec

Long

Canyond Phoenixd

For the year ended 12/31/2020

Nevada 
Gold
 Minese

Hemlo

North 
America

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs
Ounces sold – equity basis  

(000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

1,624

(306)

(2)

0

0

(507)

809

0

30

381

1

8

(163)

1,066

0

0

0

1,066

1,024

976

790

791

1,041

1,042

1,041

764

(221)

(2)

0

0

(208)

333

0

7

235

0

13

(98)

490

0

146

(56)

580

491

958

678

680

998

1,000

1,179

1,042

1,181

575

(184)

(7)

0

0

(148)

236

0

7

39

0

0

(18)

264

0

44

(17)

291

332

1,064

711

723

798

810

879

891

227

(165)

0

0

0

(24)

38

0

8

35

0

2

(17)

66

0

0

0

66

161

869

236

238

405

407

405

407

365

(94)

(137)

0

0

(51)

83

0

0

29

1

3

(13)

103

0

0

0

3,555

(970)

(148)

0

0

(938)

1,499

0

52

748

4

26

(321)

2,008

0

200

(76)

281

(44)

(1)

0

0

0

236

0

1

79

0

1

0

317

0

0

0

3,836

(1,014)

(149)

0

0

(938)

1,735

0

53

827

4

27

(321)

2,325

0

200

(76)

103

2,132

317

2,449

126

1,772

649

1,315

814

1,480

814

2,134

1,029

702

745

941

984

998

224

1,256

1,056

1,060

1,423

1,427

1,424

2,358

1,050

735

774

987

1,026

1,039

1,480

1,041

1,428

1,078

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 125

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the year ended 12/31/2020

Footnote

Pueblo Viejo

Veladero

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization  

(operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

735

(224)

(57)

0

0

(182)

272

0

3

132

0

6

(56)

357

1

91

(37)

412

541

819

504

568

660

724

761

825

213

(69)

(5)

0

0

0

139

0

0

98

2

4

0

243

0

15

0

258

186

1,151

748

777

1,308

1,337

1,390

1,419

Porgerao
106

(25)

(1)

0

0

0

80

0

2

11

3

0

0

96

0

0

0

96

87

1,225

928

934

1,115

1,121

1,116

1,122

Latin America  
& Asia Pacific

1,054

(318)

(63)

0

0

(182)

491

0

5

241

5

10

(56)

696

1

106

(37)

766

814

938

604

654

856

906

942

992

126

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the year ended 12/31/2020

Footnote

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North
 Maram

Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

Africa & 
Middle East

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs
Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

719

(267)

0

0

0

(90)

362

0

11

213

3

3

(46)

546

0

19

(4)

561

542

1,060

666

666

1,006

1,006

1,034

1,034

397

(174)

(1)

0

0

0

222

0

2

49

9

1

0

283

0

2

0

285

364

1,091

608

612

778

782

782

786

318

(91)

(2)

0

0

(36)

189

0

0

68

0

4

(12)

249

0

35

(5)

279

269

992

702

709

929

936

1,039

1,046

380

(167)

0

0

0

(22)

191

0

3

8

2

0

(1)

203

0

0

0

203

255

1,334

747

748

791

792

791

792

184

(72)

(10)

0

0

(16)

86

0

0

7

0

1

(1)

93

0

69

(11)

151

103

1,499

832

913

895

976

1,459

1,540

211

(11)

(22)

0

0

(28)

150

0

0

1

1

0

0

152

0

0

0

152

174

1,021

859

968

871

980

871

980

2,209

(782)

(35)

0

0

(192)

1,200

0

16

346

15

9

(60)

1,526

0

125

(20)

1,631

1,707

1,119

701

719

893

911

954

972

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 127

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

Footnote

Carlina

Cortezb

Turquoise
Ridgec

Long

Canyond Phoenixd

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration  
  and evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs
Ounces sold – equity basis  

(000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

1,310

(312)

(1)

(10)

0

(266)

721

0

17

307

0

10

(102)

953

0

0

0

953

967

1,004

746

747

984

985

984

985

751

(240)

(1)

0

0

(99)

411

0

8

129

0

16

(44)

520

0

332

(128)

724

798

762

515

516

651

652

903

904

425

(140)

(2)

0

0

(75)

208

0

4

70

1

2

(21)

264

0

45

(10)

299

356

846

585

588

732

735

834

837

101

(70)

0

0

0

(12)

19

0

6

26

0

0

(12)

39

0

0

0

39

57

1,088

333

335

681

683

681

683

154

(36)

(48)

0

0

(27)

43

0

1

22

0

2

(10)

58

0

0

0

58

45

2,093

947

1,600

1,282

1,935

1,282

1,935

For the year ended 12/31/2019

Nevada 
Gold
 Minese

Hemlo

North 
America

2,741

(798)

(52)

(10)

0

(479)

1,402

0

36

554

1

30

(189)

1,834

0

295

(48)

247

(27)

(1)

(23)

0

0

196

0

1

47

1

2

0

247

0

0

0

2,988

(825)

(53)

(33)

0

(479)

1,598

0

37

601

2

32

(189)

2,081

0

295

(48)

2,081

247

2,328

2,223

924

634

657

828

851

938

961

217

1,137

904

907

1,140

1,143

1,141

1,144

2,440

943

655

677

851

873

953

975

128

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the year ended 12/31/2019

Footnote

Pueblo Viejo

Veladero

Porgerao

Kalgoorliep

Latin America & 
Asia Pacific

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)
Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation  
  and project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs
Ounces sold – equity basis  

(000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

721

(196)

(61)

(2)

0

(187)

275

0

0

107

0

10
(47)

345

8

0

(3)

350

584

747

471

536

592

657

600

665

323

(115)

(8)

(1)

0

0

199

0

3

91

2

5
0

300

0

15

0

315

271

1,188

734

759

1,105

1,130

1,162

1,187

284

(42)

(3)

0

0

0

239

0

2

45

3

(2)
0

287

0

0

0

287

285

994

838

848

1,003

1,013

1,003

1,013

223

(38)

(1)

0

0

0

184

0

6

52

4

3
0

249

0

0

0

249

210

1,062

873

876

1,183

1,186

1,183

1,186

1,551

(391)

(73)

(3)

0

(187)

897

0

11

295

9

16
(47)

1,181

8

15

(3)

1,201

1,350

937

664

716

874

926

885

937

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 129

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the year ended 12/31/2019

Footnote

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North 
Maram

Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

Africa & 
Middle East

Cost of sales applicable  

to gold production

Depreciation

By-product credits

Non-recurring items

Other

Non-controlling interests

Total cash costs

General & administrative costs
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs
Minesite sustaining capital    
  expenditures

Sustaining capital leases
Rehabilitation – accretion and  
  amortization (operating sites)

Non-controlling interests

All-in sustaining costs

Project exploration and evaluation and 
project costs

Project capital expenditures

Non-controlling interests

All-in costs

Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces)

Cost of sales per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce
Total cash costs per ounce  
(on a co-product basis)

All-in sustaining costs per ounce
All-in sustaining costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

All-in costs per ounce
All-in costs per ounce  

(on a co-product basis)

f

g

h

i

g

h

j,k

k

k,l

k

k,l

k

k,l

751

(295)

0

0

0

(91)
365

0

12

165

3

1

(37)

509

0

4

(1)

512

575

1,044

634

634

886

886

891

891

403

(196)

(1)

0

0

0
206

0

3

41

1

0

0

251

0

2

0

253

363

1,111

568

571

693

696

701

704

310

(97)

(2)

0

0

(51)
160

0

0

48

0

3

(13)

198

0

9

(3)

204

248

953

646

654

802

810

824

832

402

(186)

(1)

0

0

(23)
192

0

3

11

2

0

(2)

206

0

0

0

206

245

1,469

787

789

844

846

846

848

45

(19)

(1)

0

0

(7)
18

0

0

2

0

1

(1)

20

0

3

(1)

22

27

138

(8)

(1)

0

0

(36)
93

0

0

0

1

1

0

95

0

0

0

95

81

1,207

676

709

773

806

840

1,240

1,156

1,166

1,178

1,188

1,178

873

1,188

2,049

(801)

(6)

0

0

(208)
1,034

0

18

267

7

6

(53)

1,279

0

18

(5)

1,292

1,539

1,126

673

677

834

838

842

846

a. 

 On July 1, 2019, Barrick’s Goldstrike and Newmont’s Carlin were contributed to Nevada Gold Mines and are now collectively referred to 
as Carlin. As a result, the amounts presented represent Goldstrike on a 100% basis (including our 60% share of South Arturo) up until 
June 30, 2019, and the combined results of Carlin and Goldstrike (including our share of South Arturo) on a 61.5% basis thereafter. On 
September 7, 2021, Barrick announced NGM had entered into an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire the 40% interest in 
South Arturo that NGM did not already own in exchange for the Lone Tree and Buffalo Mountain properties and infrastructure. Operating 
results  within  our  61.5%  interest  in  Carlin  includes  NGM’s  60%  interest  in  South  Arturo  up  until  May  30,  2021,  and  100%  interest 
thereafter, reflecting the terms of the Exchange Agreement which closed on October 14, 2021.

b.   On July 1, 2019, Cortez was contributed to Nevada Gold Mines, a joint venture with Newmont. As a result, the amounts presented are 
on a 100% basis up until June 30, 2019, and on a 61.5% basis thereafter. Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as 
part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush. 

c. 

 Barrick owned 75% of Turquoise Ridge through to the end of the second quarter of 2019, with our joint venture partner, Newmont, owning 
the remaining 25%. Turquoise Ridge was proportionately consolidated on the basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control 
have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities relating to the arrangement. The figures presented in this table are based on 
our 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge until June 30, 2019. On July 1, 2019, Barrick’s 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge and Newmont’s 
Twin Creeks and 25% interest in Turquoise Ridge were contributed to Nevada Gold Mines. Starting July 1, 2019, the results represent 
our 61.5% share of Turquoise Ridge and Twin Creeks, now referred to as Turquoise Ridge.

d.  A 61.5% interest in these sites was acquired as a result of the formation of Nevada Gold Mines on July 1, 2019. 

e. 

 Represents  the  combined  results  of  Cortez,  Goldstrike  (including  our  60%  share  of  South Arturo)  and  our  75%  interest  in Turquoise 
Ridge until June 30, 2019. Commencing July 1, 2019, the date Nevada Gold Mines was established, the results represent our 61.5% 
interest  in  Cortez,  Carlin  (including  Goldstrike  and  NGM’s  60%  interest  in  South  Arturo  up  until  May  30,  2021  and  100%  interest 
thereafter), Turquoise Ridge (including Twin Creeks), Phoenix and Long Canyon.

130

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f.  Non-recurring items 

 Non-recurring items in 2019 relate to organizational restructuring. These costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been 
excluded from the calculation of total cash costs. 

g.  Exploration and evaluation costs

 Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite sustaining if it supports current mine operations and project if it 
relates to future projects. Refer to page 104 of this MD&A.

h.  Capital expenditures 

 Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project 
capital expenditures are capital spending at new projects and major, discrete projects at existing operations intended to increase net 
present value through higher production or longer mine life. Significant projects in the current year are the expansion project at Pueblo 
Viejo,  construction  of  the  Third  Shaft  at  Turquoise  Ridge,  the  development  of  the  Gounkoto  underground  and  the  Veladero  Phase  7 
expansion. Refer to page 103 of this MD&A.

i.  Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization 

 Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provision 
of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites.

j.  Cost of sales per ounce

 Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) 
divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

k.  Per ounce figures  

 Cost of sales per ounce, total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based 
on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

l.  Co-product costs per ounce  

 Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis removes the 
impact of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as:

($ millions)

For the three months ended 12/31/21

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits  

(net of non-controlling interest)

($ millions)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits  

(net of non-controlling interest)

($ millions)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest 
By-product credits  

(net of non-controlling interest)

($ millions)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest 
By-product credits  

(net of non-controlling interest)

Carlina

Cortezb

Turquoise
 Ridgec

Long 
Canyond

Phoenixd

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

47

(18)

29

Nevada 
Gold 
Minese

49

(18)

31

Hemlo

Pueblo 
Viejo

0

0

0

12

(5)

7

For the three months ended 12/31/21

Veladero

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North 
Maram

Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

6

(1)

5

Carlina
0

Cortezb
1

Turquoise
 Ridgec
0

Long 
Canyond
0

Phoenixd
51

0

0

(1)

0

0

0

0

0

Veladero

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

(20)

31

North 
Maram
1

0

1

For the three months ended 9/30/21

Nevada 
Gold 
Minese
52

(21)

31

Hemlo

Pueblo 
Viejo

1

0

1

16

(6)

10

For the three months ended 9/30/21

Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n
0

5

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 131

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Carlina

Cortezb

Turquoise
 Ridgec

Long 

Canyond Phoenixd

Nevada 
Gold 
Minese

2

(1)

1

3

(1)

2

5

(2)

3

0

0

0

194

(75)

204

(79)

119

125

For the year ended 12/31/21

Hemlo

Pueblo 
Viejo

1

0

1

58

(23)

35

For the year ended 12/31/21

Veladero

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North 
Maram Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

7

0

7

0

0

0

2

0

2

2

0

2

1

0

1

15

(2)

13

0

0

0

Carlina
2

Cortezb
2

Turquoise
 Ridgec
7

Long 

Canyond Phoenixd
137

0

Nevada 
Gold 
Minese
148

(1)

1

(1)

1

(3)

4

0

0

(53)

(57)

84

91

For the year ended 12/31/20

Hemlo

Pueblo 
Viejo

1

0

1

57

(23)

34

For the year ended 12/31/20

Veladero

5

0

5

Porgerao
1

0

1

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North 
Maram Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

0

0

0

1

0

1

2

0

2

0

0

0

10

(2)

8

22

(4)

18

Carlina
1

Cortezb
1

Turquoise
 Ridgec
2

Long 

Canyond Phoenixd
48

0

Nevada 
Gold 
Minese
52

0

1

0

1

(1)

1

0

0

(18)

(19)

30

33

For the year ended 12/31/19

Hemlo

Pueblo 
Viejo

1

0

1

61

(24)

37

For the year ended 12/31/19

Veladero Porgerao Kalgoorliep
1

8

3

0

8

0

3

0

1

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Kibali

North 
Maram Tongon Bulyanhulum Buzwagim,n

0

0

0

1

0

1

2

0

2

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits (net of  
non-controlling interest)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits (net of  
non-controlling interest)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits (net of  
non-controlling interest)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits (net of  
non-controlling interest)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits (net of  
non-controlling interest)

By-product credits

Non-controlling interest
By-product credits (net of  
non-controlling interest)

m.   Formerly part of Acacia Mining plc. On September 17, 2019, Barrick acquired all of the shares of Acacia it did not already own. The results 
presented are on a 63.9% basis until September 30, 2019 (notwithstanding the completion of the Acacia transaction on September 17, 
2019, we consolidated our interest in Acacia and recorded a non-controlling interest of 36.1% in the income statement for the entirety of 
the third quarter of 2019 as a matter of convenience); on a 100% basis from October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019; and on a 84% basis 
starting January 1, 2020, the date the GoT’s 16% free carried interest was made effective. The results in the table and the discussion 
that follows are based on our share.

n.   With the end of mining at Buzwagi in the third quarter of 2021, as previously reported, we have ceased to include production or non-GAAP  

cost metrics for Buzwagi from October 1, 2021 onwards. 

o.   As Porgera was placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, no operating data or per ounce data was provided for  the  three 

month periods ended December 31, 2021 and September 30, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2021. 

p.   On November 28, 2019, we completed the sale of our 50% interest in Kalgoorlie in Western Australia to Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited  
for  total  cash  consideration  of  $750  million.  The  transaction  resulted  in  a  gain  of  $408  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31, 
2019. The operating results reported for Kalgoorlie reflect the Company’s attributable share of Kalgoorlie’s results until the date of divestiture. 

132

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisRECONCILIATION OF COPPER COST OF SALES TO C1 CASH COSTS AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS, 
INCLUDING ON A PER POUND BASIS

($ millions, except per pound information in dollars)

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

For the three months ended

For the years ended

 Cost of sales

Depreciation/amortization

Treatment and refinement charges

Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments
Less: royalties and production taxesa
By-product credits

Other

 C1 cash cost of sales

General & administrative costs

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization

Royalties and production taxes

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Sustaining leases
Inventory write-downs

 All-in sustaining costs
 Pounds sold – consolidated basis (millions pounds)
 Cost of sales per poundb,c
 C1 cash costs per poundb
 All-in sustaining costs per poundb

134

(43)

39

88

(28)

(6)

0

184

5

2

28

5

104

3

0

331

113

2.21

1.63

2.92

162

(60)

42

74

(27)

(2)

0

189

3

1

27

3

40

2
0

265

101

2.57

1.85

2.60

569

(197)

161

313

(103)

(15)

0

728

17

6

103

14

234

9

0

556

(208)

157

267

(54)

(15)

0

703

18

8

54

5

223

9
0

1,111

1,020

423

2.32

1.72

2.62

457

2.02

1.54

2.23

361

(100)

99

288

(35)

(9)

(5)

599

19

15

35

6

215

5
0

894

355

2.14

1.69

2.52

a.   For  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  royalties  and  production  taxes  include  royalties  of  $28  million  and  $103  million,  respectively 

(September 30, 2021: $27 million, 2020: $54 million and 2019: $34 million).

b.   Cost of sales per pound, C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.
c.   Copper  cost  of  sales  per  pound  is  calculated  as  cost  of  sales  across  our  copper  operations  divided  by  pounds  sold  (both  on  an  attributable  basis  using 

Barrick’s ownership share). 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 133

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisRECONCILIATION OF COPPER COST OF SALES TO C1 CASH COSTS AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS, 
INCLUDING ON A PER POUND BASIS, BY OPERATING SITE

($ millions, except per pound information in dollars)

Cost of sales

Depreciation/amortization

Treatment and refinement charges
Less: royalties and production taxesa
By-product credits

Other

C1 cash cost of sales

Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization
Royalties and production taxesa
Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

Sustaining leases

Inventory write-downs

All-in sustaining costs
Pounds sold – consolidated basis (millions pounds)
Cost of sales per poundb,c
C1 cash costs per poundb
All-in sustaining costs per poundb

12/31/21

For the three months ended

9/30/21

Zaldívar

Lumwana

Jabal  
Sayid

Zaldívar

Lumwana

Jabal  
Sayid

84

(21)

0

0

0

0

63

1

0

4

22

1

0

91

26

3.14

2.35
3.42

134

(43)

31

(28)

0

0

94

1

28

0

79

1

0

203

62

2.16

1.54
3.29

33

(8)

8

0

(6)

0

27

0

0

1

3

1

0

32

25

1.36

1.11
1.27

79

(20)

0

0

0

0

59

0

0

3

8

1

0

71

25

3.13

2.33
2.77

162

(60)

38

(27)

0

0

113

1

27

0

30

1

0

172

64

2.54

1.76
2.68

19

(4)

4

0

(2)

0

17

0

0

0

2

0

0

19

12

1.51

1.35
1.55

($ millions, except per pound  
information in dollars)

12/31/21

12/31/20

12/31/19

For the years ended December 31

Zaldívar Lumwana

Jabal  
Sayid

Zaldívar Lumwana

Cost of sales

Depreciation/amortization

Treatment and refinement charges
Less: royalties and production taxesa
By-product credits

Other

C1 cash cost of sales

Rehabilitation – accretion  
  and amortization
Royalties and production taxesa
Minesite exploration and  
  evaluation costs

Minesite sustaining  
  capital expenditures

Sustaining leases

Inventory write-downs

All-in sustaining costs
Pounds sold – consolidated basis 

(millions pounds)

Cost of sales per poundb,c
C1 cash costs per poundb
All-in sustaining costs per poundb

314

(79)

0

0

0

0

235

1

0

13

37

4

0

290

98

3.19

2.38

2.94

569

(197)

140

(103)

0

0

409

5

103

0

189

3

0

99

(21)

21

0

(15)

0

84

0

0

1

8

2

0

709

95

253

2.25

1.62

2.80

72

1.38

1.18

1.33

262

(72)

1

0

0

0

191

0

0

4

39

5

0

239

106

2.46

1.79

2.25

Jabal  
Sayid

104

(27)

19

0

(15)

0

81

0

0

1

9

0

0

556

(208)

137

(54)

0

0

431

8

54

0

175

4

0

672

91

277

2.01

1.56

2.43

74

1.42

1.11

1.24

Zaldívar Lumwana

Jabal  
Sayid

307

(86)

0

0

0

0

221

5

0

6

34

3

0

269

125

2.46

1.77

2.15

361

(100)

80

(35)

0

(5)

301

10

35

0

166

2

0

514

169

2.13

1.79

3.04

93

(27)

19

0

(9)

0

76

0

0

0

15

0

0

91

61

1.53

1.26

1.51

a.   For  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  royalties  and  production  taxes  include  royalties  of  $28  million  and  $103  million,  respectively 

(September 30, 2021: $27 million, 2020: $54 million and 2019: $34 million).

b.   Cost of sales per pound, C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.
c.   Copper  cost  of  sales  per  pound  is  calculated  as  cost  of  sales  across  our  copper  operations  divided  by  pounds  sold  (both  on  an  attributable  basis  using 

Barrick’s ownership share). 

134

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA  is  a  non-GAAP  financial  measure,  which  excludes  the 
following from net earnings:

	Q Income tax expense;
	Q Finance costs;
	Q Finance income; and
	Q Depreciation.

Management  believes  that  EBITDA  is  a  valuable  indicator  of  our 
ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund 
working  capital  needs,  service  debt  obligations,  and  fund  capital 
expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose. EBITDA 
is  also  frequently  used  by  investors  and  analysts  for  valuation 
purposes  whereby  EBITDA  is  multiplied  by  a  factor  or  “EBITDA 
multiple”  that  is  based  on  an  observed  or  inferred  relationship 
between EBITDA and market values to determine the approximate 
total enterprise value of a company.

Adjusted  EBITDA  removes  the  effect  of  impairment  charges; 
acquisition/disposition  gains/losses;  foreign  currency  translation 
gains/losses;  and  other  expense  adjustments.  We  also  remove 
the  impact  of  the  income  tax  expense,  finance  costs,  finance 
income and depreciation incurred in our equity method accounted 
investments.  We  believe  these  items  provide  a  greater  level  of 
consistency  with  the  adjusting  items  included  in  our  adjusted  net 
earnings reconciliation, with the exception that these amounts are 
adjusted  to  remove  any  impact  on  finance  costs/income,  income 
tax expense and/or depreciation as they do not affect EBITDA. We 
believe this additional information will assist analysts, investors and 
other stakeholders of Barrick in better understanding our ability to 
generate  liquidity  from  our  full  business,  including  equity  method 
investments,  by  excluding  these  amounts  from  the  calculation 
as  they  are  not  indicative  of  the  performance  of  our  core  mining 
business  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  underlying  operating 
results for the periods presented.

intended 

EBITDA  and  adjusted  EBITDA  are 

to  provide 
additional information to investors and analysts and do not have any 
standardized definition under IFRS, and should not be considered 
in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared 
in  accordance  with  IFRS.  EBITDA  and  adjusted  EBITDA  exclude 
the  impact  of  cash  costs  of  financing  activities  and  taxes,  and 
the  effects  of  changes  in  operating  working  capital  balances,  and 
therefore  are  not  necessarily  indicative  of  operating  profit  or  cash 
flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies 
may calculate EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA differently.

RECONCILIATION OF NET EARNINGS TO EBITDA AND ADJUSTED EBITDA

($ millions)

Net earnings

Income tax expense
Finance costs, neta

Depreciation

EBITDA
Impairment charges (reversals) of long-lived assetsb
Acquisition/disposition gainsc

Loss on currency translation
Other expense (income) adjustmentsd
Income tax expense, net finance costsa, and depreciation  

from equity investees

Adjusted EBITDA

For the three months ended

For the years ended

12/31/21

9/30/21

12/31/21

12/31/20

 12/31/19

1,152

304

74

557

2,087

14

(198)

13

36

118

2,070

612

323

80

538

1,553

10

(5)

5

12

94

1,669

3,288

1,344

307

2,102

7,041

(63)

(213)

29

73

391

7,258

3,614

1,332

306

2,208

7,460

(269)

(180)

50

71

360

7,492

4,574

1,783

394

2,032

8,783

(1,423)

(2,327)

109

(687)

378

4,833

a. Finance costs exclude accretion.
b.   Net impairment reversals primarily relate to non-current asset reversals at Lagunas Norte in the current year and primarily relate to our Tanzanian assets in 

the prior year. 

c.   Acquisition/disposition gains for the current year primarily relate to the gain on the sale of Lone Tree in the fourth quarter of 2021, while the prior year mainly 

relates to the gains on the sale of Eskay Creek, Massawa, Morila and Bullfrog. 

d.   Other expense adjustments for both the current and prior year primarily relate to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera. The current year periods were 
also impacted by a $25 million litigation settlement. The prior year was further impacted by the impact of changes in the discount rate assumptions on our 
closed mine rehabilitation provision and donations related to Covid-19, partially offset by the gain on the remeasurement of the residual cash liability relating 
to our silver sale agreement with Wheaton. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 135

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
RECONCILIATION OF SEGMENT INCOME TO SEGMENT EBITDA

($ millions)

Income

Depreciation

EBITDA

Income

Depreciation

EBITDA

Income

Depreciation

EBITDA

Income

Depreciation

EBITDA

Income
Depreciation

EBITDA

Carlina 

(61.5%)

Cortezb 
(61.5%)

247

51

298

139

55

194

Turquoise 
Ridgec 

(61.5%)

Nevada 
Gold 
Minesd 

(61.5%)

Pueblo 
Viejo 
(60%)

Loulo-
Gounkoto 
(80%)

Kibali 
(45%)

Veladero 
(50%)

North
Marae
(84%)

Bulyanhulue 

(84%)

51

31

82

617

176

793

90

35

125

74

58

132

71

37

108

43

37

80

68

12

80

51

14

65

For the three months ended 12/31/21

Carlina 

(61.5%)

Cortezb 
(61.5%)

147

41

188

77

46

123

Turquoise 
Ridgec 

(61.5%)

Nevada 
Gold 
Minesd 

(61.5%)

Pueblo 
Viejo 
(60%)

Loulo-
Gounkoto 
(80%)

Kibali 
(45%)

Veladero 
(50%)

North
Marae
(84%)

Bulyanhulue 

(84%)

51

31

82

333

162

495

113

37

150

84

53

137

74

36

110

24

17

41

52

12

64

37

13

50

For the three months ended 9/30/21

Carlina 

(61.5%)

Cortezb 
(61.5%)

733

170

903

337

181

518

Turquoise 
Ridgec 

(61.5%)

Nevada 
Gold 
Minesd 

(61.5%)

Pueblo 
Viejo 
(60%)

Loulo-
Gounkoto 
(80%)

Kibali 
(45%)

Veladero 
(50%)

229

123

352

1,675

630

2,305

445

142

587

380

222

602

278

141

419

118

85

203

For the year ended 12/31/21

North
Marae
(84%)

214

47

261

Bulyanhulue 

(84%)

122

48

170

For the year ended 12/31/20

Carlina 

(61.5%)

Cortezb 
(61.5%)

Turquoise 
Ridgec 

(61.5%)

795

188

983

385

138

523

229

113

342

Carlina 

(61.5%)

Cortezb 
(61.5%)

Turquoise 
Ridgec 

(61.5%)

370
239

609

459
197

656

201
92

293

Nevada 
Gold 
Minesd 

(61.5%)

1,636

596

2,232

Nevada 
Gold 
Minesd 

(61.5%)

1,050
592

1,642

Pueblo 
Viejo 
(60%)

Loulo-
Gounkoto 
(80%)

Kibali 
(45%)

Veladero 
(50%)

508

136

644

358

214

572

244

174

418

114

69

183

North
Marae
(84%)

214

76

290

Bulyanhulue 

(84%)

27

60

87

For the year ended 12/31/19

Pueblo 
Viejo 
(60%)

Loulo-
Gounkoto 
(80%)

Kibali 
(45%)

Veladero 
(50%)

402
120

522

190
236

426

108
196

304

57
115

172

North
Marae
(84%)

112
75

187

Bulyanhulue 

(84%)

(14)
14

0

a.   On  July  1,  2019,  Barrick’s  Goldstrike  and  Newmont’s  Carlin  were  contributed  to  Nevada  Gold  Mines  and  are  now  referred  to  as  Carlin. As  a  result,  the 
amounts presented represent Goldstrike on a 100% basis (including our 60% share of South Arturo) up until June 30, 2019, and the combined results of 
Carlin and Goldstrike (including our share of South Arturo) on a 61.5% basis thereafter. On September 7, 2021, Barrick announced NGM had entered into 
an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire the 40% interest in South Arturo that NGM did not already own in exchange for the Lone Tree and Buffalo 
Mountain properties and infrastructure. Operating results within our 61.5% interest in Carlin includes NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo up until May 30, 
2021, and 100% interest thereafter, reflecting the terms of the Exchange Agreement which closed on October 14, 2021.

b.   On July 1, 2019, Cortez was contributed to Nevada Gold Mines, a joint venture with Newmont. As a result, the amounts presented are on a 100% basis up 
until June 30, 2019, and on a 61.5% basis thereafter. Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez 
management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush. 

c.   Barrick owned 75% of Turquoise Ridge through to the end of the second quarter of 2019, with our joint venture partner, Newmont, owning the remaining 25%. 
Turquoise Ridge was proportionately consolidated on the basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have rights to the assets and obligations 
for the liabilities relating to the arrangement. The figures presented in this table are based on our 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge until June 30, 2019. On 
July 1, 2019, Barrick’s 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge and Newmont’s Twin Creeks and 25% interest in Turquoise Ridge were contributed to Nevada Gold 
Mines. Starting July 1, 2019, the results represent our 61.5% share of Turquoise Ridge and Twin Creeks, now referred to as Turquoise Ridge.

d.   Represents the combined results of Cortez, Goldstrike (including our 60% share of South Arturo) and our 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge until June 30, 2019. 
Commencing July 1, 2019, the date Nevada Gold Mines was established, the results represent our 61.5% interest in Cortez, Carlin (including Goldstrike and 
NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo up until May 30, 2021 and 100% interest thereafter), Turquoise Ridge (including Twin Creeks), Phoenix and Long Canyon.
e.   Formerly  part  of Acacia  Mining  plc.  On  September  17,  2019,  Barrick  acquired  all  of  the  shares  of Acacia  it  did  not  own.  Operating  results  are  included  
at  63.9%  until  September  30,  2019  (notwithstanding  the  completion  of  the  Acacia  transaction  on  September  17,  2019,  we  consolidated  our  interest  in  
Acacia and recorded a non-controlling interest of 36.1% in the income statement for the entirety of the third quarter of 2019 as a matter of convenience), on 
a 100% basis from October 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, and on an 84% basis thereafter as the GoT’s 16% free-carried interest was made effective from 
January 1, 2020. 

136

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisRealized Price
Realized  price  is  a  non-GAAP  financial  measure  which  excludes 
from sales:

	Q Unrealized gains and losses on non-hedge derivative contracts;
	Q Unrealized  mark-to-market  gains  and  losses  on  provisional 

pricing from copper and gold sales contracts;
	Q Sales attributable to ore purchase arrangements;
	Q Treatment and refining charges; and
	Q Cumulative  catch-up  adjustment  to  revenue  relating  to  our 

streaming arrangements. 

This  measure  is  intended  to  enable  Management  to  better 
understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold and 
copper  sales  because  unrealized  mark-to-market  values  of  non-
hedge  gold  and  copper  derivatives  are  subject  to  change  each 
period due to changes in market factors such as spot and forward 
gold and copper prices, so that prices ultimately realized may differ 
from  those  recorded.  The  exclusion  of  such  unrealized  mark-to-
market gains and losses from the presentation of this performance 
measure  enables  investors  to  understand  performance  based  on 
the realized proceeds of selling gold and copper production.

The gains and losses on non-hedge derivatives and receivable 
balances  relate  to  instruments/balances  that  mature  in  future 
periods,  at  which  time  the  gains  and  losses  will  become  realized. 
The  amounts  of  these  gains  and  losses  reflect  fair  values  based 
on market valuation assumptions at the end of each period and do 
not  necessarily  represent  the  amounts  that  will  become  realized 
on  maturity.  We  believe  this  provides  investors  and  analysts 
with  a  more  accurate  measure  with  which  to  compare  to  market 
gold  prices  and  to  assess  our  gold  sales  performance.  For  those 
reasons, management believes that this measure provides a more 
accurate  reflection  of  our  Company’s  past  performance  and  is  a 
better indicator of its expected performance in future periods.

The  realized  price  measure  is  intended  to  provide  additional 
information,  and  does  not  have  any  standardized  definition  under 
IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for 
measures  of  performance  prepared  in  accordance  with  IFRS. The 
measure is not necessarily indicative of sales as determined under 
IFRS.  Other  companies  may  calculate  this  measure  differently. 
The  following  table  reconciles  realized  prices  to  the  most  directly 
comparable IFRS measure.

RECONCILIATION OF SALES TO REALIZED PRICE PER OUNCE/POUND

($ millions, except  
per ounce/pound  
information in dollars) 

Sales
Sales applicable to  
  non-controlling interests
Sales applicable to equity 
  method investmentsa,b
Realized non-hedge gold/copper 
  derivative gains
Sales applicable to sites in care 
  and maintenancec
Treatment and refining charges
Otherd
Revenues – as adjusted
Ounces/pounds sold  

(000s ounces/millions pounds)c

Realized gold/copper price  
  per ounce/pounde

For the three months ended

Gold

Copper

For the years ended

Gold

Copper

12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21

9/30/21 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19 12/31/21 12/31/20 12/31/19

2,977

2,531

263

209

10,738

11,670

9,186

962

697

393

(931)

(799)

0

0

(3,323)

(3,494)

(1,981)

172

166

222

154

660

648

543

0

0

483

492

0

(8)

1

2

0

(11)

9

0

2,213

1,896

1,234

1,071

0

0

39

0

524

113

0

0

42

0

405

101

0

(88)

10

2

0

1

(170)

(140)

7

13

0

22

7,999

8,674

7,631

1,830

1,337

4,468

4,879

5,467

423

457

0

0

157

0

0

0

99

0

984

355

1,793

1,771

4.63

3.98

1,790

1,778

1,396

4.32

2.92

2.77

0

707

0

0

161

0

a.   Represents  sales  of  $172  million  and  $661  million,  respectively,  for  the  three  months  and  year  ended  December  31,  2021  (September  30,  2021:  $166 
million; 2020: $648 million; 2019: $505 million) applicable to our 45% equity method investment in Kibali and $nil and $nil, respectively (September 30, 2021: 
$nil; 2020: $nil; 2019: $39 million) applicable to our 40% equity method investment in Morila for gold. Represents sales of $119 million and $423 million, 
respectively, for the three months and year ended December 31, 2021 (September 30, 2021: $108 million; 2020: $298 million; 2019: $343 million) applicable 
to our 50% equity method investment in Zaldívar and $111 million and $305 million, respectively (September 30, 2021: $50 million; 2020: $204 million; 2019: 
$168 million) applicable to our 50% equity method investment in Jabal Sayid.

b.   Sales applicable to equity method investments are net of treatment and refinement charges. 
c.   Figures exclude Pierina, Golden Sunlight starting in the third quarter of 2019, Morila starting in the third quarter of 2019 up until its divestiture in November 
2020, Lagunas Norte starting in the fourth quarter of 2019, and Buzwagi starting in the fourth quarter of 2021 up until its divestiture in June 2021 from the 
calculation of realized price per ounce. Some of these assets are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance.

d.   Represents cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue relating to our streaming arrangements. Refer to note 2f to the Financial Statements for more information.
e.  Realized price per ounce/pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 137

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
The scientific and technical information contained in this MD&A has 
been reviewed and approved by Craig Fiddes, SME-RM, Manager –  
Resource  Modeling,  Nevada  Gold  Mines;  Chad  Yuhasz,  P.Geo, 
Mineral  Resource  Manager,  Latin  America  &  Asia  Pacific;  Simon 
Bottoms,  CGeol,  MGeol,  FGS,  FAusIMM,  Mineral  Resources 
Manager:  Africa  &  Middle  East;  Rodney  Quick,  MSc,  Pr.  Sci.Nat, 
Mineral  Resource  Management  and  Evaluation  Executive;  John 
Steele, CIM, Metallurgy, Engineering and Capital Projects Executive; 
and Rob Krcmarov, FAusIMM, Technical Advisor to Barrick – each 
a  “Qualified  Person”  as  defined  in  National  Instrument  43-101  – 
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. 

All  mineral  reserve  and  mineral  resource  estimates  are 
estimated  in  accordance  with  National  Instrument  43-101  – 
Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects.  Unless  otherwise 
noted, such mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are as 
of December 31, 2021.

ENDNOTES 
1 

6 

7 

2 

3 

4 

5 

 A  Tier  One  Gold Asset  is  an  asset  with  a  reserve  potential  to 
deliver  a  minimum  10-year  life,  annual  production  of  at  least 
500,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over the 
mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve.
 A  Tier  Two  Gold Asset  is  an  asset  with  a  reserve  potential  to 
deliver  a  minimum  10-year  life,  annual  production  of  at  least 
250,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over the 
mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve. 
 A  Tier  One  Copper Asset  is  an  asset  with  a  reserve  potential 
of  greater  than  five  million  tonnes  of  contained  copper  and  
C1 cash costs per pound over the mine life that are in the lower 
half of the industry cost curve. 
 A Strategic Asset is an asset which in the opinion of Barrick, has 
the potential to deliver significant unrealized value in the future. 
 Currently consists of Barrick’s Lumwana mine and Zaldívar and 
Jabal Sayid copper joint ventures.
 Further  information  on  these  non-GAAP  financial  measures, 
including  detailed  reconciliations,  is  included  on  pages  111  to 
137 of this MD&A.
 Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across 
our  gold  operations  (excluding  sites  in  closure  or  care  and 
maintenance)  divided  by  ounces  sold  (both  on  an  attributable 
basis  using  Barrick’s  ownership  share).  Copper  cost  of  sales 
per  pound  is  calculated  as  cost  of  sales  across  our  copper 
operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis 
using Barrick’s ownership share). 
 Total  reportable  incident  frequency  rate  (“TRIFR”)  is  a  ratio 
calculated as follows: number of reportable injuries x 1,000,000 
hours divided by the total number of hours worked. Reportable 
injuries  include  fatalities,  lost  time  injuries,  restricted  duty 
injuries, and medically treated injuries. Lost time injury frequency 
rate  (“LTIFR”)  is  a  ratio  calculated  as  follows:  number  of  lost 
time  injuries  x  1,000,000  hours  divided  by  the  total  number  of 
hours worked.
 Class  1  –  High  Significance  is  defined  as  an  incident  that 
causes  significant  negative  impacts  on  human  health  or  the 
environment or an incident that extends onto publicly accessible 
land and has the potential to cause significant adverse impact 
to surrounding communities, livestock or wildlife. 
10  Preliminary figures and subject to external assurance.

8 

9 

11   All  mineral  resource  and  mineral  reserve  estimates  of  tonnes, 
Au  oz, Ag  oz  and  Cu  lb  are  reported  to  the  second  significant 
digit. All measured and indicated mineral resource estimates of 
grade and all proven and probable mineral reserve estimates of 
grade for Au g/t, Ag g/t and Cu % are reported to two decimal 
places.  All  inferred  mineral  resource  estimates  of  grade  for 
Au  g/t,  Ag  g/t  and  Cu  %  are  reported  to  one  decimal  place. 
2021  polymetallic  mineral  resources  and  mineral  reserves  are 
estimated  using  the  combined  value  of  gold,  copper  &  silver 
and accordingly are reported as Gold, Copper & Silver mineral 
resources and mineral reserves.

12   Estimated  in  accordance  with  National  Instrument  43-101  –  
Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects  as  required  by 
Canadian securities regulatory authorities. Estimates are as of 
December  31,  2021,  unless  otherwise  noted.  Proven  reserves 
of 240 tonnes grading 2.20 g/t, representing 17 million ounces 
of  gold,  and  380  million  tonnes  grading  0.41%,  representing 
3,400  million  pounds  of  copper.  Probable  reserves  of  1,000 
tonnes grading 1.60 g/t, representing 53 million ounces of gold, 
and  1,100  million  tonnes  grading  0.37%,  representing  8,800 
million  pounds  of  copper.  Measured  resources  of  490  tonnes 
grading  2.05  g/t,  representing  32  million  ounces  of  gold,  and 
680  million  tonnes  grading  0.38%,  representing  5,700  million 
pounds of copper. Indicated resources of 2,800 tonnes grading 
1.40  g/t,  representing  130  million  ounces  of  gold,  and  2,500 
million  tonnes  grading  0.34%,  representing  19,000  million 
pounds  of  copper.  Inferred  resources  of  1,000  tonnes  grading 
1.3 g/t, representing 42 million ounces of gold, and 450 million 
tonnes  grading  0.2%,  representing  2,100  million  pounds  of 
copper.  Complete  mineral  reserve  and  mineral  resource  data 
for  all  mines  and  projects  referenced  in  this  MD&A,  including 
tonnes, grades, and ounces, can be found on pages 145 to 151 
of Barrick’s Annual Report 2021. 

13   Estimated  in  accordance  with  National  Instrument  43-101  –  
Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects  as  required  by 
Canadian  securities  regulatory  authorities.  Estimates  are 
as  of  December  31,  2020,  unless  otherwise  noted.  Proven 
reserves  of  280  million  tonnes  grading  2.37  g/t,  representing 
21  million  ounces  of  gold,  and  350  million  tonnes  grading 
0.39%,  representing  3,000  million  pounds  of  copper.  Probable 
reserves  of  990  million  tonnes  grading  1.46  g/t,  representing 
47  million  ounces  of  gold,  and  1,100  million  tonnes  grading 
0.39%, representing 9,700 million pounds of copper. Measured 
resources  of  530  million  tonnes  grading  2.11  g/t,  representing 
36  million  ounces  of  gold,  and  600  million  tonnes  grading 
0.36%, representing 4,800 million pounds of copper. Indicated 
resources of 2,800 million tonnes grading 1.41 g/t, representing 
130  million  ounces  of  gold,  and  2,500  million  tonnes  grading 
0.36%,  representing  20,000  million  pounds  of  copper.  Inferred 
resources  of  980  million  tonnes  grading  1.4  g/t,  representing  
43 million ounces of gold, and 440 million tonnes grading 0.2%, 
representing  2,200  million  pounds  of  copper.  Complete  2020 
mineral  reserve  and  mineral  resource  data  for  all  mines  and 
projects referenced in this MD&A, including tonnes, grades, and 
ounces,  can  be  found  on  pages  34  to  47  of  Barrick’s  Annual 
Information Form/Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,  
2020  on  file  with  Canadian  provincial  securities  regulatory 
authorities and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
14   See the Technical Report on the Turquoise Ridge mine, dated 
March  25,  2020,  and  filed  on  SEDAR  at  www.sedar.com  and 
EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 25, 2020.

15   See  the  Technical  Report  on  the  Pueblo  Viejo  mine,  Sanchez 
Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic, dated March 19, 2018, 
and  filed  on  SEDAR  at  www.sedar.com  and  EDGAR  at  www.
sec.gov on March 23, 2018.

138

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis16   North Leeville Significant Interceptsa

Drill Holeb
NLX-00009

NLX-00010

NLX-00012

CGX-21086

Azimuth

23

117

305

90

Drill Results from Q4 2021

Dip

(79)

(72)

(79)

(81)

Interval (m)

822.3 – 833.9

791.6 – 848.3
826.9 – 831.2

837.3 – 845.1

773.6 – 778.8

Width (m)c
11.6

56.7
4.3

7.8

5.2

Au (g/t)

12.00

28.39
8.88

26.03

24.50

  a.  All intercepts calculated using a 3.4 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 3.0 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.
  b.  Carlin Trend drill hole nomenclature: Project area (NLX – North Leeville, CGX – Leeville) followed by hole number.
  c.  True widths of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.

 The  drilling  results  for  the  Carlin  Trend  contained  in  this  MD&A  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  National  Instrument  43-101 
–  Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects.  All  drill  hole  assay  information  has  been  manually  reviewed  and  approved  by  staff 
geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by an independent laboratory, ALS 
Minerals. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality 
assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on North Leeville conform to 
industry accepted quality control methods.

17  REN Significant Interceptsa

Drill Holeb

Azimuth

MRC-21001

301

MRC-21010

MRC-21011

MRC-21014

MRC-21015

239

262

80

96

80

Drill Results from Q4 2021

Dip

(28)

(22)

(27)

(29)

(20)

(20)

Interval (m)

273.7 – 313.9

329.2 – 341.4

   235 – 260.3

266.9 – 276.1

299.6 – 307.2

347.5 – 351.7

413.9 – 430.7

286.8 – 298.1

242.2 – 258.8

   274 – 293.5

Width (m)c
40.2

True Width (m)c
15.8

12.2

25.3

9.3

7.6

4.3

16.8

11.3

16.6

19.5

12.9

15.9

13.1

9.1

9.1

12.2

7.6

12.2

14.0

Au (g/t)

27.6

13.78

16.94

24.75

5.11

5.25

7.03

17.49

9.63

5.25

  a.  All intercepts calculated using a 3.4 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 3.0 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.
  b.  Carlin Trend drill hole nomenclature: Project area (MRC – Ren) followed by hole number. 
  c.  True widths of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.

 The drilling results for REN contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards 
of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects. All  drill  hole  assay  information  has  been  manually  reviewed  and  approved  by  staff  geologists  and 
re-checked  by  the  project  manager.  Sample  preparation  and  analyses  are  conducted  by  an  independent  laboratory,  ALS  Minerals. 
Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance 
procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on REN conform to industry accepted 
quality control methods.

18  CHUG Hanson Footwall Significant Interceptsa

Drill Holeb

Azimuth

CMX-21012

CMX-21008

CMX-21025

217

093

228

Drill Results from Q4 2021

Dip

42

55

47

Interval (m)

   479.6 – 499.5

564.4 – 577

   584.4 – 608.1

True Width (m)c
16.9

Au (g/t)

11.24

No Significant Interceptd

No Significant Interceptd
22.6

23.07

  a.  All intercepts calculated using a 4.2 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2.5 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.
  b.  Cortez drill hole nomenclature: Project (CMX – CHUG Minex) followed by the year (21 for 2021) then hole number. 
  c.  True widths of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.
  d.   Sub-grade  intercepts  in  drillhole  CMX-21012  of  12.6  m  at  2.59  g/t  and  CMX-21008  of  5.2  m  at  2.75  g/t  and  5.1  m  at  1.91  g/t  using  a  1.0  g/t  cutoff 
uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2.5 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width, have been listed in previous reports for the purpose of showing 
the presence of the mineral system.

 The drilling results for Cortez contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards 
of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects. All  drill  hole  assay  information  has  been  manually  reviewed  and  approved  by  staff  geologists  and 
re-checked  by  the  project  manager.  Sample  preparation  and  analyses  are  conducted  by  an  independent  laboratory,  ALS  Minerals. 
Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance 
procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling at Cortez conform to industry accepted 
quality control methods.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 139

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19  Loulo-Gounkoto Significant Interceptsa

Drill Results from Q4 2021

Drill Holeb

Azimuth

Dip

Interval (m)

336.8 – 340

Width (m)c
3.20

Au (g/t)

15.53

Includingd
Interval (m) Width (m)c

Au (g/t)

YRDH024

229.26

(56.48)

371.65 – 377.45

346.03 – 348.67

131.1 – 138.5

139.1 – 141.7

YRDH027

230.26

(56.16)

156.5 – 162.4

296.8 – 299.9

YRDH029

225.00

(55.00)

300.9 – 303.45

312.7 – 315.15

YRDH030

225.00

(55.00)

320.5 – 324.8

2.64

5.80

7.40

2.60

5.90

3.10

2.55

2.45

4.30

312 – 324.4

12.40

YRDH031

230.00

(55.00)

343.2 – 345.6

337.17 – 342.4

YRAC0015

YRAC0017

270.00

270.00

(60.00)

(60.00)

YRAC0029

270.00

(60.00)

YRAC0030

YRAC0031

YRAC0045

YRAC0047

YRAC0048

270.00

270.00

270.00

270.00

270.00

(60.00)

(60.00)

(60.00)

(60.00)

(60.00)

27 – 30

42 – 48

13 – 18

57 – 59

63 – 66

2 – 13

15 – 22

7 – 10

30 – 32

13 – 15

27 – 35

5.23

2.40

3.00

6.00

5.00

2.00

3.00

11.00

7.00

3.00

2.00

2.00

8.00

1.30

0.76

6.03

6.64

2.89

0.77

2.41

0.64

0.92

3.33

9.54

1.72

3.05

2.89

0.52

0.69

1.02

0.96

1.26

0.58

1.21

1.94

3.57

42 – 44

2.00

7.36

28 – 32

4.00

5.77

  a.   All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2 m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 2 m total width.
  b.   Loulo-Gounkoto drill hole nomenclature: prospect initial YR (Yalea Ridge and Sansamba West), followed by type of drilling AC (Air Core), RC (Reverse 

Circulation), DH (Diamond Drilling) RCDH (RC/Diamond Tail).

  c.  True widths uncertain at this stage.
  d.   All intercepts calculated using a 3.0 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2 m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 2 m total width.

 The drilling results for the Loulo-Gounkoto property contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 
43-101  –  Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects. All  drill  hole  assay  information  has  been  manually  reviewed  and  approved  by 
staff  geologists  and  re-checked  by  the  project  manager.  Sample  preparation  and  analyses  are  conducted  by  SGS  Laboratories,  an 
independent  laboratory.  Industry  accepted  best  practices  for  preparation  and  fire  assaying  procedures  are  utilized  to  determine  gold 
content.  Procedures  are  employed  to  ensure  security  of  samples  during  their  delivery  from  the  drill  rig  to  the  laboratory.  The  quality 
assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Loulo property conform 
to industry accepted quality control methods.

140

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20  Nielle Significant Interceptsa

Drill Results from Q4 2021

Drill Holeb

Azimuth

Dip

SNRC052

SNRC053

SNRCDH001

SNRCDH002

SNRCDH003
SNRCDH004
SNRCDH005

SNRCDH006

SNRCDH007

SNRCDH008

SNRCDH009

SNRC057

SNRC060

SNRC103

SNRC105

SNRC106

SNRC108
SNRC114
SNRC115
SNRC118

SNRC119

SNRC120

SNRC122

119

117

121

115

117
120
120

114

117

298

300

117

120

119

125

115

120
128
126
119

114

126

118

(51)

(53)

(50)

(52)

(50)
(54)
(53)

(58)

(53)

(53)

(53)

(50)

(51)

(49)

(49)

(52)

(50)
(53)
(51)
(54)

(51)

(47)

(48)

Interval (m)

144.00 – 146.00
169.00 – 175.00
183.00 – 186.00
213.00 – 215.00
219.00 – 223.00
225.00 – 233.00
140.00 – 142.00
188.00 – 205.00
208.00 – 210.00
219.00 – 222.00
254.00 – 262.00
263.00 – 274.70
277.26 – 284.00
286.40 – 293.08
372.00 – 374.00
384.50 – 387.20
202.00 – 206.00
225.00 – 228.00
198.00 – 200.00
208.00 – 210.00
222.00 – 225.00
236.00 – 240.00
350.07 – 366.20
346.80 – 349.95
286.80 – 291.32
296.18 – 300.96
303.00 – 306.00
311.00 – 314.00
317.70 – 323.00
328.85 – 332.90
294.00 – 300.10
317.35 – 322.55
324.40 – 331.00
335.37 – 338.61
355.90 – 361.90
387.10 – 390.80
38.00 – 42.00
43.00 – 48.00
52.00 – 54.00
189.00 – 191.00
207.00 – 209.00
217.00 – 230.00
50.00 – 64.00
66.00 – 68.00
90.00 – 102.00
109.00 – 120.00
26.00 – 61.00
65.00 – 69.00
74.00 – 76.00
0.00 – 5.00
9.00 – 12.00
73.00 – 76.00
29.00 – 38.00
115.00 – 122.00
73.00 – 76.00
85.00 – 90.00
43.00 – 51.00
67.00 – 69.00
117.00 – 122.00
123.00 – 132.00

Width (m)c
2.00
6.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
8.00
2.00
17.00
2.00
3.00
8.00
11.70
6.74
6.68
2.00
2.70
4.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
16.13
3.15
4.52
4.78
3.00
3.00
5.30
4.05
6.10
5.20
6.60
3.24
6.00
3.70
4.00
5.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
13.00
14.00
2.00
12.00
11.00
35.00
4.00
2.00
5.00
3.00
3.00
9.00
7.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
2.00
5.00
9.00

Au (g/t)

2.90
1.43
1.15
2.63
1.29
4.52
1.01
2.87
2.07
11.77
1.91
5.17
2.11
5.20
0.56
1.54
2.29
1.31
0.90
2.69
0.75
0.92
2.32
2.96
1.36
2.20
0.88
2.16
2.20
1.49
0.87
4.30
1.60
1.56
4.79
1.65
8.24
1.25
0.58
0.50
0.59
2.08
12.01
1.19
1.95
10.47
8.99
1.32
0.53
21.46
0.93
6.62
2.60
4.94
0.70
12.54
3.39
0.96
1.08
4.20

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 141

Management’s Discussion and Analysis20  Nielle Significant Interceptsa (continued)

Drill Holeb

Azimuth

SNRC123

SNRC125

SNRC127

SNRC128
SNRC129

SNRC131

SNRC132
SNRC133
SNRC134

SNRC135

SNRC136

SNRC137
SNRC138
SNRC139
SNRC158
SNRC160

SNRC161
SNRC162
SNRC164

SNDDH003A

SNRC073A
KORAC001
KORAC002
KORAC009
KORAC021

KORAC022

117

120

125

123
120

120

120
120
125

125

121

122
120
123
120
121

131
120
120

295

121
120
120
120
120

120

Drill Results from Q4 2021
Dip

Interval (m)
88.00 – 90.00
96.00 – 106.00
8.00 – 11.00
14.00 – 25.00
26.00 – 28.00
91.00 – 106.00
107.00 – 117.00
56.00 – 58.00
61.00 – 84.00
21.00 – 33.00
73.00 – 78.00
83.00 – 85.00
91.00 – 93.00
95.00 – 115.00
8.00 – 10.00
36.00 – 38.00
40.00 – 68.00
6.00 – 20.00
161.00 – 176.00
93.00 – 102.00
104.00 – 109.00
120.00 – 124.00
126.00 – 137.00
65.00 – 72.00
79.00 – 91.00
94.00 – 96.00
101.00 – 114.00
25.00 – 27.00
38.00 – 41.00
43.00 – 45.00
54.00 – 66.00
68.00 – 70.00
17.00 – 22.00
179.00 – 182.00
52.00 – 57.00
48.00 – 51.00
50.00 – 57.00
60.00 – 63.00
66.00 – 70.00
74.00 – 80.00
83.00 – 101.00
8.00 – 18.00
25.00 – 28.00
275.42 – 284.00
321.10 – 332.00
338.00 – 343.00
351.10 – 354.20
138.00 – 140.00
148.00 – 152.00
164.00 – 166.00
177.00 – 179.00
190.00 – 203.00
87.00 – 92.00
12.00 – 23.00
50.00 – 60.00
29.00 – 32.00
41.00 – 48.00
51.00 – 66.00

Width (m)c
2.00
10.00
3.00
11.00
2.00
15.00
10.00
2.00
23.00
12.00
5.00
2.00
2.00
20.00
2.00
2.00
28.00
14.00
15.00
9.00
5.00
4.00
11.00
7.00
12.00
2.00
13.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
12.00
2.00
5.00
3.00
5.00
3.00
7.00
3.00
4.00
6.00
18.00
10.00
3.00
8.58
10.90
5.00
3.10
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
13.00
5.00
11.00
10.00
3.00
7.00
15.00

Au (g/t)
1.28
6.23
4.44
7.22
0.99
1.92
5.37
1.67
7.03
4.53
2.09
1.51
0.90
4.59
1.04
0.58
6.24
3.59
5.91
2.22
2.97
0.93
1.98
3.04
12.80
0.79
7.91
6.50
3.59
20.75
3.00
0.58
1.76
1.08
4.42
3.26
1.04
3.64
2.37
2.87
8.91
4.84
1.31
0.79
2.27
1.23
2.29
2.23
2.07
2.46
1.69
4.06
0.69
0.88
0.96
1.22
1.05
3.54

(50)

(50)

(51)

(51)
(50)

(52)

(50)
(50)
(51)

(49)

(53)

(51)
(50)
(50)
(50)
(51)

(50)
(50)
(50)

(52)

(50)
(50)
(50)
(50)
(50)

(50)

a. All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2 m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 2 m width.
b. Nielle  drill  hole  nomenclature:  prospect  initial  SN  (Seydou  North),  KOR  (Koro),  followed  by  type  of  drilling  RC  (Reverse  Circulation),  DDH  (Diamond 

Drilling), RCDH (RC pre-collar with Diamond Tail), or AC (Air Core).

c. True widths are uncertain at this stage.

142

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis The  drilling  results  for  the  Nielle  property  contained  in  this  MD&A  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  National  Instrument  
43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff 
geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by SGS, an independent laboratory. 
Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance 
procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Nielle property conform to industry 
accepted quality control methods.

21  Kibali Significant Interceptsa

Drill Holeb

Azimuth

KPRC0001

KPRC0002

290

290

Dip

(60)

(60)

Drill Results from Q4 2021

Interval (m)

Width (m)c

Au (g/t)

Interval (m)

Includingd
Width (m)

Au (g/t)

100.00 – 104.00

26.00 – 30.00

4.00

4.00

3.80

0.83

   101.00 – 
102.00

1.00

6.27

  a.   All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2 m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 25% total width.
  b.  Kibali drill hole nomenclature: prospect initial KP (Kolapi) followed by type of drilling RC (Reverse Circulation) with no designation of the year.
  c.  True width of intercepts uncertain at this stage.
  d.   All including intercepts, calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped, minimum intercept width is 1m, no internal dilution, with grade significantly 

above (>40%) the overall intercept grade.

 The  drilling  results  for  the  Kibali  property  contained  in  this  MD&A  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  National  Instrument  
43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff 
geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by SGS, an independent laboratory. 
Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance 
procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Kibali property conform to industry 
accepted quality control methods.

22  Jabal Sayid Significant Interceptsa

Drill Holeb
BDH1153
BDH4084

Azimuth

273
21

Drill Results from Q4 2021

Dip

(75)
(52)

Interval (m)

375.20 – 510.90
5.00 – 11.00

Width (m)c
135.70
6.00

Cu (%)

1.93
0.78

  a.   All intercepts calculated using a 0.5% Cu cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2 m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 5 m total width.
  b.  Jabal Sayid drill hole nomenclature: BDH (surface diamond hole) followed by lode and hole number.
  c.  True widths uncertain at this stage.

 The  drilling  results  for  the  Jabal  Sayid  property  contained  in  this  MD&A  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  National  Instrument  
43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff 
geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS Jeddah, an independent 
laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality 
assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Jabal Sayid property 
conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 143

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS

ALL-IN  SUSTAINING  COSTS:  A  non-GAAP  measure  of  cost  per 
ounce/pound  for  gold/copper.  Refer  to  page  114  of  this  MD&A  for 
further information and a reconciliation of the measure.

AUTOCLAVE:  Oxidation  process  in  which  high  temperatures  and 
pressures  are  applied  to  convert  refractory  sulfide  mineralization 
into amenable oxide ore.

BY-PRODUCT: A secondary metal or mineral product recovered in 
the milling process such as silver.

C1  CASH  COSTS:  A  non-GAAP  measure  of  cost  per  pound  for 
copper. Refer to page 133 of this MD&A for further information and 
a reconciliation of the measure.

CONCENTRATE:  A  very  fine,  powder-like  product  containing  the 
valuable ore mineral from which most of the waste mineral has been 
eliminated.

CONTAINED  OUNCES:  Represents  ounces 
the  ground 
before  loss  of  ounces  not  able  to  be  recovered  by  the  applicable 
metallurgical processing process.

in 

DEVELOPMENT: Work carried out for the purpose of gaining access 
to an ore body. In an underground mine, this includes shaft sinking, 
crosscutting, drifting and raising. In an open-pit mine, development 
includes the removal of overburden (more commonly referred to as 
stripping in an open pit).

DILUTION:  The  effect  of  waste  or  low-grade  ore  which  is 
unavoidably  extracted  and  comingled  with  the  ore  mined  thereby 
lowering the recovered grade from what was planned to be mined.

DORÉ:  Unrefined  gold  and  silver  bullion  bars  usually  consisting 
of  approximately  90  percent  precious  metals  that  will  be  further 
refined to almost pure metal.

DRILLING:
Core: drilling with a hollow bit with a diamond cutting rim to produce 
a cylindrical core that is used for geological study and assays.
Reverse circulation: drilling that uses a rotating cutting bit within a 
double-walled drill pipe and produces rock chips rather than core. 
Air or water is circulated down to the bit between the inner and outer 
wall of the drill pipe. The chips are forced to the surface through the 
center of the drill pipe and are collected, examined and assayed. 
In-fill: drilling closer spaced holes in between existing holes, used 
to  provide  greater  geological  detail  and  to  help  upgrade  resource 
estimates to reserve estimates.
Step-out:  drilling  to  intersect  a  mineralized  horizon  or  structure 
along strike or down-dip.

EXPLORATION: Prospecting, sampling, mapping, drilling and other 
work involved in searching for minerals.

FREE CASH FLOW: A non-GAAP measure that reflects our ability to 
generate cash flow. Refer to page 112 of this MD&A for a definition.

GRADE: The amount of metal in each tonne of ore, expressed as 
grams per tonne (g/t) for precious metals and as a percentage for 
most other metals.
Cut-off grade: the minimum metal grade at which an ore body can 
be economically mined (used in the calculation of ore reserves).
Mill-head grade: metal content per tonne of ore going into a mill for 
processing. 
Reserve grade: estimated metal content of an ore body, based on 
reserve calculations.

HEAP LEACHING: A process whereby gold/copper is extracted by 
“heaping” broken ore on sloping impermeable pads and continually 
applying  to  the  heaps  a  weak  cyanide  solution/sulfuric  acid  which 
dissolves 
the  contained  gold/copper.  The  gold/copper-laden 
solution is then collected for gold/copper recovery.

HEAP LEACH PAD: A large impermeable foundation or pad used 
as a base for stacking ore for the purpose of heap leaching.

MILL: A processing facility where ore is finely ground and thereafter 
undergoes  physical  or  chemical  treatment  to  extract  the  valuable 
metals.

MINERAL  RESERVE:  See  pages  145  to  151  –  Summary  Gold/
Copper Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources.

MINERAL  RESOURCE:  See  pages  145  to  151  –  Summary  Gold/
Copper Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources.

OPEN PIT: A mine where the minerals are mined entirely from the 
surface.

ORE: Rock, generally containing metallic or non-metallic minerals, 
which can be mined and processed at a profit.

ORE  BODY: A  sufficiently  large  amount  of  ore  that  can  be  mined 
economically.

OUNCES: Troy ounce is a unit of measure used for weighing gold 
at 999.9 parts per thousand purity and is equivalent to 31.1035g.

RECLAMATION: The process by which lands disturbed as a result 
of  mining  activity  are  modified  to  support  future  beneficial  land 
use.  Reclamation  activity  may  include  the  removal  of  buildings, 
equipment,  machinery  and  other  physical  remnants  of  mining, 
closure  of  tailings  storage  facilities,  leach  pads  and  other  mine 
features, and contouring, covering and re-vegetation of waste rock 
dumps and other disturbed areas.

RECOVERY  RATE: A  term  used  in  process  metallurgy  to  indicate 
the  proportion  of  valuable  material  physically  recovered  in  the 
processing  of  ore.  It  is  generally  stated  as  a  percentage  of  the 
valuable material recovered compared to the total material originally 
contained in the ore.

REFINING: The final stage of metal production in which impurities 
are removed through heating to extract the pure metal.

ROASTING: The treatment of sulfide ore by heat and air, or oxygen 
enriched air, in order to oxidize sulfides and remove other elements 
(carbon, antimony or arsenic). 

STRIPPING: Removal of overburden or waste rock overlying an ore 
body in preparation for mining by open-pit methods. 

TAILINGS:  The  material  that  remains  after  all  economically  and 
technically  recoverable  precious  metals  have  been  removed  from 
the ore during processing.

TOTAL CASH COSTS: A non-GAAP measure of cost per ounce for 
gold. Refer to page 114 of this MD&A for further information and a 
reconciliation of the measure.

144

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisMineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

The tables on the next seven pages set forth Barrick’s interest in the total proven and probable gold, silver and copper reserves and in the 
total measured, indicated and inferred gold, silver and copper resources and certain related information at each property. For further details 
of  proven  and  probable  mineral  reserves  and  measured,  indicated  and  inferred  mineral  resources  by  category,  metal  and  property,  see 
pages 145 to 151.

The  Company  has  carefully  prepared  and  verified  the  mineral  reserve  and  mineral  resource  figures  and  believes  that  its  method  of 
estimating  mineral  reserves  has  been  verified  by  mining  experience.  These  figures  are  estimates,  however,  and  no  assurance  can  be 
given  that  the  indicated  quantities  of  metal  will  be  produced.  Metal  price  fluctuations  may  render  mineral  reserves  containing  relatively 
lower grades of mineralization uneconomic. Moreover, short-term operating factors relating to the mineral reserves, such as the need for 
orderly development of ore bodies or the processing of new or different ore grades, could affect the Company’s profitability in any particular 
accounting period.

DEFINITIONS
A  mineral  resource  is  a  concentration  or  occurrence  of  diamonds, 
natural  solid  inorganic  material,  or  natural  solid  fossilized  organic 
material  including  base  and  precious  metals,  coal,  and  industrial 
minerals in or on the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of 
such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic 
extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics 
and  continuity  of  a  mineral  resource  are  known,  estimated  or 
interpreted  from  specific  geological  evidence  and  knowledge. 
Mineral resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological 
confidence, into inferred, indicated and measured categories.

An inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource 
for  which  quantity  and  grade  or  quality  can  be  estimated  on  the 
basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably 
assumed,  but  not  verified,  geological  and  grade  continuity.  The 
estimate  is  based  on  limited  information  and  sampling  gathered 
through  appropriate  techniques  from  locations  such  as  outcrops, 
trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

An indicated mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource 
for  which  quantity,  grade  or  quality,  densities,  shape  and  physical 
characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient 
to  allow  the  appropriate  application  of  technical  and  economic 
parameters,  to  support  mine  planning  and  evaluation  of  the 
economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed 
and  reliable  exploration  and  testing  information  gathered  through 
appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, 
pits,  workings  and  drill  holes  that  are  spaced  closely  enough  for 
geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.

A measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource 
for  which  quantity,  grade  or  quality,  densities,  shape  and  physical 
characteristics  are  so  well  established  that  they  can  be  estimated 
with  confidence  sufficient  to  allow  the  appropriate  application  of 

technical and economic parameters, to support production planning 
and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate 
is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing 
information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations 
such  as  outcrops,  trenches,  pits,  workings  and  drill  holes  that 
are  spaced  closely  enough  to  confirm  both  geological  and  grade 
continuity.

Mineral resources, which are not mineral reserves, do not have 

demonstrated economic viability.

A  mineral  reserve  is  the  economically  mineable  part  of  a 
measured  or  indicated  mineral  resource  demonstrated  by  at  least 
a  preliminary  feasibility  study.  This  study  must  include  adequate 
information  on  mining,  processing,  metallurgical,  economic  and 
other  relevant  factors  that  demonstrate,  at  the  time  of  reporting, 
that economic extraction can be justified.

A mineral reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for 
losses that may occur when the material is mined. Mineral reserves 
are  sub-divided  in  order  of  increasing  confidence  into  probable 
mineral reserves and proven mineral reserves. A probable mineral 
reserve  is  the  economically  mineable  part  of  an  indicated  and,  in 
some  circumstances,  a  measured  mineral  resource  demonstrated 
by  at  least  a  preliminary  feasibility  study.  This  study  must  include 
adequate 
information  on  mining,  processing,  metallurgical, 
economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time 
of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified.

A proven mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a 
measured mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary 
feasibility  study.  This  study  must  include  adequate  information  on 
mining,  processing,  metallurgical,  economic  and  other  relevant 
factors  that  demonstrate,  at  the  time  of  reporting,  that  economic 
extraction is justified.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 145

GOLD MINERAL RESERVES1,2,3

As at December 31, 2021

PROVEN

PROBABLE

TOTAL

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
ozs
(Moz)

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
ozs
(Moz)

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
ozs
(Moz)

Based on attributable ounces

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST
Bulyanhulu surface

Bulyanhulu underground

Bulyanhulu (84.00%) total

Jabal Sayid surface

Jabal Sayid underground

Jabal Sayid (50.00%) total

Kibali surface

Kibali underground

Kibali (45.00%) total

Loulo-Gounkoto surface

Loulo-Gounkoto underground

Loulo-Gounkoto (80.00%) total

North Mara surface

North Mara underground

North Mara (84.00%) total

Tongon surface (89.70%)

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TOTAL

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC
Norte Abierto surface (50.00%)

Porgera surface4
Porgera underground4

Porgera (24.50%) total4
Pueblo Viejo surface (60.00%)

Veladero surface (50.00%)

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC TOTAL

NORTH AMERICA
Carlin surface

Carlin underground
Carlin (61.50%) total5
Cortez surface
Cortez underground6

Cortez (61.50%) total

Hemlo surface
Hemlo underground

Hemlo (100%) total

Long Canyon surface (61.50%)

Phoenix surface (61.50%)

Turquoise Ridge surface

Turquoise Ridge underground

Turquoise Ridge (61.50%) total

NORTH AMERICA TOTAL

TOTAL

See “Mineral Reserves and Resources Endnotes”.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

0.072

0.34 0.00079

0.039

0.040

0.37

1.4

1.7

0.81

1.2

2.0

0.037

0.16

0.20

0.095

4.1

2.4

–

0.13

0.13

0.53

0.13

3.2

0.95

3.6

4.5

0.095

0.21

0.31

6.3

6.4

5.0

9.4

14

9.6

8.4

18

0.66

0.90

1.6

2.0

42

0.19

0.19

2.31

4.54

3.76

2.62

4.45

3.48

1.73

5.56

3.93

1.51

3.00

110

0.65

–

6.79

6.79

2.20

0.41

0.74

2.58

9.25

6.01

2.13

8.57

4.43

–

0.58

0.58

7.5

9.8

130

11

12

24

1.4

0.78

2.2

0.018
0.34

0.36

0.21

8.3

18

8.8

26

61

240

0.32 0.00018
0.055
5.02

4.79

1.43

0.72

2.13

11.05

5.09

4.81

2.20

0.055

0.0097

0.19

1.2

3.1

4.3

9.4

17

0.00010

10.42 0.000035

0.00010 10.42 0.000035

10

10

–

6.7

6.7

12

11

23

12

21

33

37

5.9

43

5.9

120

480

4.8

2.6

7.4

68

80

640

73

7.0

80

37

26

63

–
6.1

6.1

0.40

96

8.3

12

20

270

1,000

7.76

7.76

–

0.33

0.33

2.51

4.54

3.50

3.26

5.03

4.38

1.73

3.12

1.92

1.99

3.29

0.59

3.66

6.25

4.59

2.22

0.82

0.84

2.18

8.18

2.70

1.66

7.77

4.16

–
5.19

5.19

1.06

0.59

1.90

9.89

6.59

2.64

1.60

2.5

2.5

–

0.071

0.071

0.95

1.6

2.6

1.3

3.4

4.7

2.1

0.59

2.6

0.38

13

9.2

0.56

0.53

1.1

4.9

2.1

17

5.1

1.8

6.9

2.0

6.5

8.5

–
1.0

1.0

0.013

1.8

0.51

3.7

4.3

23

53

10

10

7.76

7.76

2.5

2.5

0.072

0.34 0.00079

13

13

17

21

37

22

29

51

38

6.8

44

7.9

160

600

4.8

3.2

8.0

76

90

770

84

19

100

39

27

65

0.26

0.26

2.45

4.54

3.60

2.98

4.86

4.06

1.73

3.44

1.99

1.87

3.22

0.60

3.66

6.34

4.75

2.22

0.77

0.83

2.23

8.86

3.46

1.68

7.79

4.17

0.11

0.11

1.3

3.0

4.3

2.1

4.6

6.7

2.1

0.75

2.8

0.47

17

12

0.56

0.66

1.2

5.4

2.2

21

6.0

5.4

11

2.1

6.7

8.8

0.018
6.4

0.32 0.00018
1.1
5.18

6.4

0.61

100

26

5.16

1.18

0.60

2.05

21 10.39

46

330

1,300

5.74

3.04

1.71

1.1

0.023

2.0

1.7

6.9

8.6

32

69

146

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Mineral Reserves and Mineral ResourcesCOPPER MINERAL RESERVES1,2,3,7

As at December 31, 2021

Based on attributable pounds

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST
Bulyanhulu surface

Bulyanhulu underground

Bulyanhulu (84.00%) total

Jabal Sayid surface

Jabal Sayid underground

Jabal Sayid (50.00%) total

Lumwana surface (100%)

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TOTAL

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC
Norte Abierto surface (50.00%)

Zaldívar surface (50.00%)

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC TOTAL

NORTH AMERICA

Phoenix surface (61.50%)

NORTH AMERICA TOTAL
TOTAL

See “Mineral Reserves and Resources Endnotes”.

SILVER MINERAL RESERVES1,2,3,7

As at December 31, 2021

Based on attributable ounces

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST

Bulyanhulu surface
Bulyanhulu underground

Bulyanhulu (84.00%) total

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TOTAL
LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC
Norte Abierto surface (50.00%)

Pueblo Viejo surface (60.00%)

Veladero surface (50.00%)

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC TOTAL
NORTH AMERICA

Phoenix surface (61.50%)

NORTH AMERICA TOTAL

TOTAL

See “Mineral Reserves and Resources Endnotes”.

PROVEN
Cu
Grade
(%)

Tonnes
(Mt)

Contained 
Cu
(Mlb)

PROBABLE

Tonnes
(Mt)

Cu
Grade
(%)

Contained 
Cu
(Mlb)

TOTAL
Cu
Grade
(%)

Contained 
Cu
(Mlb)

Tonnes
(Mt)

–

–

–

0.072

6.3

6.4

68

75

110

180

300

11

11

380

–

–

–

3.06

2.30

2.31

0.51

0.67

0.19

0.45

0.35

0.17

0.17

0.41

–

–

–

4.9

320

330

770

1,100

480

1,800

2,300

40

40

0.00010

10

10

–

6.7

6.7

410

420

480

42

530

130

130

3,400

1,100

0.61

0.37

0.37

–

2.24

2.24

0.58

0.60

0.23

0.34

0.24

0.17

0.17

0.37

0.0014

0.00010

82

82

–

330

330

5,200

5,600

2,400

320

2,700

470

470

8,800

10

10

0.072

13

13

470

500

600

230

820

140

140

1,500

0.61

0.37

0.37

3.06

2.27

2.27

0.57

0.61

0.22

0.43

0.28

0.17

0.17

0.38

0.0014

82

82

4.9

650

650

6,000

6,700

2,900

2,100

5,000

510

510

12,000

PROVEN
Ag
Grade
(g/t)

Tonnes
(Mt)

Contained 
Ag
(Moz)

–
–

–

–

–
–

–

–

110

1.91

7.5 11.18

9.8 12.41

130

3.21

8.3

8.3

140

7.40

7.40

3.46

–
–

–

–

7.0

2.7

3.9

14

2.0

2.0

16

PROBABLE

Tonnes
(Mt)

Ag
Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
Ag
(Moz)

TOTAL
Ag
Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
Ag
(Moz)

Tonnes
(Mt)

0.00010
10

4.32 0.000014
2.3
6.92

0.00010
10

4.32 0.000014
2.3
6.92

10

10

6.92

6.92

480

1.43

68 14.85

80 14.78

630

4.58

96

96

740

6.35

6.35

4.84

2.3

2.3

22

33

38

93

20

20

120

10

10

6.92

6.92

600

1.52

76 14.49

90 14.52

2.3

2.3

29

35

42

760

4.34

110

100

100

880

6.43

6.43

4.62

22

22

130

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 147

Mineral Reserves and Mineral ResourcesGOLD MINERAL RESOURCES1,2,3,8,9

As at December 31, 2021

MEASURED (M)10

INDICATED (I)10

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
ozs
(Moz)

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
ozs
(Moz)

(M) + (I)10
Contained 
ozs
(Moz)

INFERRED11

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
ozs
(Moz)

Based on attributable ounces

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST
Bulyanhulu surface

Bulyanhulu underground

Bulyanhulu (84.00%) total

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Jabal Sayid surface

0.072

0.34 0.00079

Jabal Sayid underground

Jabal Sayid (50.00%) total

Kibali surface

Kibali underground

Kibali (45.00%) total

Loulo-Gounkoto surface

Loulo-Gounkoto underground

Loulo-Gounkoto (80.00%) total

North Mara surface

North Mara underground

North Mara (84.00%) total

Tongon surface (89.70%)

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TOTAL

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC

Alturas surface (100%)

Norte Abierto surface (50.00%)

Pascua Lama surface (100%)

Porgera surface4
Porgera underground4

Porgera (24.50%) total4
Pueblo Viejo surface (60.00%)

Veladero surface (50.00%)

LATIN AMERICA AND  
  ASIA PACIFIC TOTAL12
NORTH AMERICA
Carlin surface 

Carlin underground
Carlin (61.50%) total5
Cortez surface
Cortez underground6

Cortez (61.50%) total

Donlin surface (50.00%)

Fourmile underground (100%)

Hemlo surface

Hemlo underground

Hemlo (100%) total

Long Canyon surface

Long Canyon underground

Long Canyon (61.50%) total

Phoenix surface (61.50%)
Turquoise Ridge surface

Turquoise Ridge underground

Turquoise Ridge (61.50%) total

NORTH AMERICA TOTAL

TOTAL

6.8

6.9

7.1

14

21

9.5

16
25
13

0.64

13

2.8

70

–

190

43

–

0.64

0.64

63

11

0.22

0.23

2.26

4.63

3.84

2.57

4.57
3.82
2.54

3.56

2.59

1.79

3.15

–

0.63

1.86

–

6.66

6.66

2.03

0.39

310

1.09

28

23

51

1.4
1.2

2.6

3.9

–

2.33

7.53

4.68

2.12
8.06

4.88

2.52

–

0.049

0.050

0.52

2.1

2.6

0.79

2.3
3.1
1.0

0.073

1.1

0.16

7.1

–

3.9

2.6

–

0.14

0.14

4.1

0.14

11

2.1

5.6

7.8

0.096
0.32

0.41

0.31

–

0.024

0.48 0.00037

0.66

0.68

0.54

–

0.54

13
25

4.64

4.50

2.66

–

2.66

0.65
2.12

11 10.28

36

110

490

4.57

4.08

2.05

0.098

0.099

0.046

–

0.046

0.27
1.7

3.5

5.3

14

32

See “Mineral Reserves and Resources Endnotes”.

148

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

0.00010 10.42 0.000035

0.000035

17

17

–

7.9

7.9

20

22

42

14

30
44
40

18

58

7.8

180

–

1,100

390

10

4.2

14

150

130

8.92

8.92

–

0.37

0.37

2.25

4.06

3.18

3.31

4.94
4.42
1.41

2.04

1.61

2.21

3.34

–

0.53

1.49

3.21

6.20

4.09

2.04

0.71

1,800

0.92

150

12

170

92
32

120

270

1.82

6.97

2.20

1.07
7.40

2.71

2.24

1.00 10.90

27

11

38

5.3

0.90

4.73

2.03

2.45

1.1 10.68

6.5

230
23

18

41

870

2,800

3.87

0.51
2.00

8.84

5.05

1.99

1.40

4.8

4.8

–

0.092

0.092

4.8

4.8

0.00079

0.14

0.14

1.5

2.8

4.3

1.5

4.8
6.2
1.8

1.2

3.0

0.55

19

–

19

19

1.0

0.84

1.9

10

2.9

52

9.0

2.7

12

3.2
7.7

11

19

0.35

0.78

1.7

2.5

0.42

0.38

0.80

3.7
1.5

5.2

6.6

56

130

2.0

5.0

6.9

2.3

7.1
9.3
2.8

1.3

4.1

0.71

26

–

22

21

1.0

0.98

2.0

14

3.0

63

11

8.4

19

3.3
8.0

11

20

0.35

0.78

1.8

2.6

0.47

0.38

0.85

4.0
3.2

8.7

12

70

160

–

24

24

–

1.3

1.3

3.7

6.6

10

3.2

8.3
12
5.0

7.8

13

3.5

64

260

370

15

3.9

1.3

5.3

38

18

–

8.0

8.0

–

0.6

0.6

2.1

3.0

2.7

2.1

3.1
2.8
1.1

1.8

1.6

2.7

4.5

1.1

0.4

1.7

2.5

6.5

3.5

1.7

0.7

710

0.8

58

10.0

68

62
15

76

46

6.4

5.4

3.7

9.1

1.1

0.53

1.6

30
10

0.68

11

250

1,000

1.2

7.5

2.1

0.5
5.9

1.6

2.0

10.6

0.9

5.6

2.8

0.8

9.1

3.6

0.4
1.8

6.2

2.0

2.0

1.3

–

6.2

6.2

–

0.022

0.022

0.25

0.64

0.89

0.22

0.82
1.0
0.18

0.46

0.65

0.30

9.1

8.9

4.4

0.86

0.31

0.28

0.59

2.1

0.39

17

2.2

2.4

4.6

1.1
2.8

3.9

3.0

2.2

0.15

0.67

0.82

0.029

0.16

0.19

0.36
0.60

0.14

0.74

16

42

Mineral Reserves and Mineral ResourcesCOPPER MINERAL RESOURCES1,3,7,8,9

As at December 31, 2021

MEASURED (M)10

INDICATED (I)10

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(%)

Contained 
lbs
(Mlb)

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(%)

Contained 
lbs
(Mlb)

(M) + (I)10
Contained 
lbs
(Mlb)

INFERRED11

Tonnes
(Mt)

Grade
(%)

Contained 
lbs
(Mlb)

Based on attributable pounds

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST
Bulyanhulu surface

Bulyanhulu underground

Bulyanhulu (84.00%) total

Jabal Sayid surface

Jabal Sayid underground

Jabal Sayid (50.00%) total

Lumwana surface (100%)

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TOTAL

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC
Norte Abierto surface (50.00%)

Zaldívar surface (50.00%)

LATIN AMERICA AND  
  ASIA PACIFIC TOTAL

NORTH AMERICA

Phoenix surface (61.50%)

NORTH AMERICA TOTAL

TOTAL

0.00010 0.61

0.0014

0.0014

–

–
–

0.072

6.8

6.9

93

99

–

–
–

3.06

2.60

2.60

0.51

0.65

–

–
–

4.9

390

390

1,000

1,400

17 0.41
17 0.41

–

–

7.9 2.22

7.9 2.22

150
150

–

380

380

880 0.54

10,000

910 0.55

11,000

170

390

0.21

0.40

790

3,400

1,000 0.21

240 0.36

4,700

1,900

150
150

4.9

770

780

11,000

12,000

5,500

5,300

–

24
24

–

1.3

1.3

7.6

33

360

26

–

0.4
0.4

–

1.4

1.4

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.3

–

200
200

–

38

38

93

330

1,400

190

560

0.34

4,200

1,300 0.24

6,600

11,000

390

0.2

1,600

16

16

680

0.16

0.16

0.38

55

55

310 0.15

310 0.15

1,000

1,000

1,100

1,100

5,700

2,500 0.34

19,000

24,000

32

32

450

0.1

0.1

0.2

90

90

2,100

See “Mineral Reserves and Resources Endnotes”.

SILVER MINERAL RESOURCES1,3,7,8,9

As at December 31, 2021

MEASURED (M)10

INDICATED (I)10

Based on attributable ounces

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST
Bulyanhulu surface

Bulyanhulu underground

Bulyanhulu (84.00%) total

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TOTAL

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC
Norte Abierto surface (50.00%)

Pascua-Lama surface (100%)

Pueblo Viejo surface (60.00%)

Veladero surface (50.00%)

LATIN AMERICA AND  
  ASIA PACIFIC TOTAL

NORTH AMERICA

Phoenix surface (61.50%)

NORTH AMERICA TOTAL

TOTAL

Tonnes
(Mt)

Ag
Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
Ag
(Moz)

Tonnes
(Mt)

Ag
Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
Ag
(Moz)

(M) + (I)10
Contained 
Ag
(Moz)

INFERRED11

Tonnes
(Mt)

Ag
Grade
(g/t)

Contained 
Ag
(Moz)

0.00010

4.32 0.000014

0.000014

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

190

1.62

43 57.21

63 11.47

11 11.35

–

–

–

–

10

79

23

4.0

17

17

17

7.31

7.31

7.31

1,100

1.23

390 52.22

150 12.63

130 14.19

310 11.68

120

1,800 14.56

13

13

6.74

6.74

320 11.48

2.8

2.8

120

230

230

5.88

5.88

2,000 13.50

3.9

3.9

3.9

43

660

63

58

820

43

43

870

3.9

3.9

3.9

53

740

86

62

940

46

46

990

–

24

24

24

370

15

38

18

–

6.3

6.3

6.3

1.0

17.8

9.0

13.8

440

2.8

30

30

500

5.6

5.6

3.1

–

4.9

4.9

4.9

11

8.8

11

8.1

39

5.4

5.4

50

See “Mineral Reserves and Resources Endnotes”.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 149

Mineral Reserves and Mineral ResourcesSUMMARY GOLD MINERAL RESERVES1,2,3

For the years ended December 31

2021

2020

Based on attributable ounces

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST
Bulyanhulu surface

Bulyanhulu underground

Bulyanhulu Total

Buzwagi surface

Jabal Sayid surface

Jabal Sayid underground

Jabal Sayid Total
Kibali surface

Kibali underground

Kibali Total 

Loulo-Gounkoto surface 

Loulo-Gounkoto underground 

Loulo-Gounkoto Total 

North Mara surface

North Mara underground

North Mara Total

Tongon surface 

AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TOTAL

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC

Norte Abierto surface
Porgera surface4
Porgera underground4

Porgera Total4
Pueblo Viejo surface

Veladero surface

LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA PACIFIC TOTAL

NORTH AMERICA
Carlin surface

Carlin underground

Carlin Total5

Cortez surface
Cortez underground6

Cortez Total

Hemlo surface

Hemlo underground

Hemlo Total

Long Canyon surface

Phoenix surface 

Turquoise Ridge surface 

Turquoise Ridge underground 

Turquoise Ridge Total 

NORTH AMERICA TOTAL

TOTAL

See “Mineral Reserves and Resources Endnotes”.

Ownership
%

Tonnes 
(Mt)

Grade 
(g/t)

Ounces 
(Moz)

Ownership
%

Tonnes 
(Mt)

Grade 
(g/t)

Ounces 
(Moz)

84.00% 0.00010

10.42 0.000035

84.00%

84.00%

84.00%

50.00%

50.00%

50.00%
45.00%

45.00%

45.00%

80.00%

80.00%
80.00%

84.00%

84.00%

84.00%

89.70%

50.00%

24.50%

24.50%

24.50%

60.00%

50.00%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

100%

100%

100%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

10

10

–

0.072

13

13
17

21

37

22

29
51

38

6.8

44

7.9

160

600

4.8

3.2

8.0

76

90

770

84

19

100

39

27

65

0.018

6.4

6.4

0.61

100

26

21

46

330

1,300

7.76

7.76

–

0.34

0.26

0.26
2.45

4.54

3.60

2.98

4.86
4.06

1.73

3.44

1.99

1.87

3.22

0.60

3.66

6.34

4.75

2.22

0.77

0.83

2.23

8.86

3.46

1.68

7.79

4.17

0.32

5.18

5.16

1.18

0.60

2.05

10.39

5.74

3.04

1.71

2.5

2.5

–

0.00079

0.11

0.11
1.3

3.0

4.3

2.1

4.6
6.7

2.1

0.75

2.8

0.47

17

12

0.56

0.66

1.2

5.4

2.2

21

6.0

5.4

11

2.1

6.7

8.8

0.00018

1.1

1.1

0.023

2.0

1.7

6.9

8.6

32

69

84.00%

84.00%

84.00%

84.00%

50.00%

50.00%

50.00%
45.00%

45.00%

45.00%

80.00%

80.00%

80.00%

84.00%

84.00%

84.00%

89.70%

50.00%

47.50%

47.50%

47.50%

60.00%

50.00%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

100%

100%

100%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

61.50%

–

6.9

6.9

1.7

–

–

12
14

20

34

17

31

48

18

7.3

26

9.3

140

600

9.2

6.3

15

83

110

810

91

19

110

52

11

64

0.57

9.0

9.6

3.1

95

26

17

43

320

1,300

–

8.92

8.92

0.76

–

–

0.23
2.47

4.81

3.84

3.21

4.93

4.33

1.44

5.01

2.46

1.92

3.52

0.60

3.66

6.34

4.75

2.31

0.75

0.88

2.21

9.17

3.42

1.52

9.38

2.92

0.77

5.08

4.82

2.21

0.58

2.03

10.92

5.58

2.80

1.66

–

2.0

2.0

0.042

–

–

0.090
1.1

3.1

4.2

1.7

5.0

6.7

0.85

1.2

2.0

0.57

16

12

1.1

1.3

2.4

6.2

2.6

23

6.5

5.6

12

2.6

3.4

6.0

0.014

1.5

1.5

0.22

1.8

1.7

6.0

7.7

29

68

150

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resourcesreserves 

(“reserves”)  and  mineral 

required  by  Canadian  securities 

MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES ENDNOTES
 Mineral 
resources 
1. 
(“resources”)  have  been  estimated  as  at  December  31,  2021 
(unless otherwise noted) in accordance with National Instrument 
43-101  –  Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects  (“NI 
43-101”)  as 
regulatory 
authorities. For United States reporting purposes, the SEC has 
adopted  amendments  to  its  disclosure  rules  to  modernize  the 
mineral  property  disclosure  requirements  for  issuers  whose 
securities  are  registered  with  the  SEC  under  the  Securities 
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). 
These  amendments  became  effective  February  25,  2019  (the 
“SEC  Modernization  Rules”)  with  compliance  required  for  the 
first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021. The SEC 
Modernization  Rules  replace  the  historical  property  disclosure 
requirements  for  mining  registrants  that  were  included  in  SEC 
Industry  Guide  7,  which  will  be  rescinded  from  and  after  the 
required  compliance  date  of  the  SEC  Modernization  Rules. 
As  a  result  of  the  adoption  of  the  SEC  Modernization  Rules, 
the  SEC  now  recognizes  estimates  of  “measured”,  “indicated” 
and  “inferred”  mineral  resources.  In  addition,  the  SEC  has 
amended  its  definitions  of  “proven  mineral  reserves”  and 
“probable  mineral  reserves”  to  be  substantially  similar  to  the 
corresponding  Canadian  Institute  of  Mining,  Metallurgy  and 
Petroleum definitions, as required by NI 43-101. U.S. investors 
should  understand  that  “inferred”  mineral  resources  have  a 
great  amount  of  uncertainty  as  to  their  existence  and  great 
uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. In addition, 
U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all 
of  Barrick’s  mineral  resources  constitute  or  will  be  converted 
into reserves. Mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations 
have  been  prepared  by  employees  of  Barrick,  its  joint  venture 
partners or its joint venture operating companies, as applicable, 
under  the  supervision  of  regional  Mineral  Resource  Managers 
Simon  Bottoms,  Africa  &  Middle  East  Mineral  Resource 
Manager;  Chad  Yuhasz,  Latin  America  &  Australia  Pacific 
Mineral  Resource  Manager;  Craig  Fiddes,  North  America 
Resource  Modeling  Manager  and  reviewed  by  Rodney  Quick, 
Barrick’s  Mineral  Resource  Management  and  Evaluation 
Executive.  Reserves  have  been  estimated  based  on  an 
assumed gold price of US$1,200 per ounce, an assumed silver 
price  of  US$16.50  per  ounce,  and  an  assumed  copper  price 
of  US$2.75  per  pound  and  long-term  average  exchange  rates 
of  1.30  CAD/US$,  except  at  Zaldívar,  where  mineral  reserves 
for 2020 and 2021 were calculating using Antofagasta guidance 
and an assumed copper price of US$3.10 per pound. Reserve 
estimates incorporate current and/or expected mine plans and 
cost levels at each property. Varying cut-off grades have been 
used  depending  on  the  mine  and  type  of  ore  contained  in  the 
reserves.  Barrick’s  normal  data  verification  procedures  have 
been employed in connection with the calculations. Verification 
procedures  include  industry-standard  quality  control  practices. 
Resources as at December 31, 2021 have been estimated using 
varying  cut-off  grades,  depending  on  both  the  type  of  mine  or 
project, its maturity and ore types at each property.

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

 In  confirming  our  annual  reserves  for  each  of  our  mineral 
properties,  projects,  and  operations,  we  conduct  a  reserve 
test  on  December  31  of  each  year  to  verify  that  the  future 
undiscounted cash flow from reserves is positive. The cash flow 
ignores all sunk costs and only considers future operating and 
closure expenses as well as any future capital costs.
 All  mineral  resource  and  mineral  reserve  estimates  of  tonnes,  
Au oz, Ag oz and Cu lb are reported to the second significant digit. 
 Porgera  mineral  reserves  and  mineral  resources  are  reported 
on  a  24.5% 
interest  basis,  reflecting  Barrick’s  expected 
ownership  interest  following  the  implementation  of  the  binding 
Commencement  Agreement  entered  into  by  Barrick  Niugini 
Limited  (“BNL”),  its  affiliate  Porgera  (Jersey)  Limited,  the 
Government  of  Papua  New  Guinea  (“PNG”),  Kumul  Minerals 
Holdings  Limited,  a  state-owned  mining  company,  and 
Mineral  Resources  Enga  Limited,  effective  February  3,  2022. 
the  Framework 
The  Commencement  Agreement  replaced 
Agreement  signed  in  April  2021  and  provides,  among  other 
things,  for  ownership  of  Porgera  to  be  held  in  a  new  joint 
venture owned 51% by PNG stakeholders and 49% by BNL or 
an  affiliate.  BNL  is  jointly  owned  on  a  50/50  basis  by  Barrick 
and Zijin Mining Group and will retain operatorship of the mine 
under  the  terms  of  the  Commencement  Agreement.  Efforts 
are  ongoing  to  execute  definitive  agreements  to  implement 
the  Commencement Agreement  and  finalize  a  timeline  for  the 
reopening  of  the  Porgera  mine  and  resumption  of  full  mine 
operations. For additional information, see page 62 of Barrick’s 
Annual Report 2021.
 On October 14, 2021, NGM acquired the 40% interest in South 
Arturo  that  NGM  did  not  already  own  from  i-80  Gold  Corp. 
Accordingly,  Carlin  mineral  reserve  and  resource  estimates 
include South Arturo on a 36.9% basis as at December 31, 2020, 
and on a 61.5% basis as at December 31, 2021. For additional 
information,  see  page  61  of  Barrick’s  Annual  Report  2021.
 Cortez  underground  includes  20  million  tonnes  at  7.29  g/t  for  
4.8  million  ounces  of  probable  reserves,  23  million  tonnes 
at  7.07  g/t  for  5.2  million  ounces  of  indicated  resources  and 
14  million  tonnes  at  6.0  g/t  for  2.8  million  ounces  of  inferred 
resources related to Goldrush. As noted in endnote #9, mineral 
resources are reported on an inclusive basis.
 2021  polymetallic  mineral  resources  and  mineral  reserves  are 
estimated  using  the  combined  value  of  gold,  copper  &  silver 
and accordingly are reported as gold, copper and silver mineral 
resources and mineral reserves.
 Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have 
demonstrated economic viability. 

9.  Mineral resources are reported inclusive of mineral reserves.
10.  All measured and indicated mineral resource estimates of grade 
and all proven and probable mineral reserve estimates of grade 
for Au g/t, Ag g/t and Cu % are reported to two decimal places.
11.   All inferred mineral resource estimates of grade for Au g/t, Ag g/t  

and Cu % are reported to one decimal place.

12.  On June 1, 2021, Barrick sold its 100% interest in the Lagunas 
Norte  gold  mine  to  Boroo  Pte  Ltd.  For  additional  information, 
see page 61 of Barrick’s Annual Report 2021.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 151

Mineral Reserves and Mineral ResourcesManagement’s Responsibility

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements

The  accompanying  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been 
prepared by and are the responsibility of the Board of Directors and 
Management of the Company.

The  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  in 
accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  as 
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and reflect 
Management’s  best  estimates  and  judgments  based  on  currently 
available information. The Company has developed and maintains 
a  system  of  internal  controls  in  order  to  ensure,  on  a  reasonable 
and cost effective basis, the reliability of its financial information.

The  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  audited  by 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants. 
Their report outlines the scope of their examination and opinion on 
the consolidated financial statements.

Graham Shuttleworth
Senior Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
February 15, 2022

Management’s Report on Internal  
Control over Financial Reporting

over  financial  reporting.  Based  on  management’s  assessment,  
Barrick’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  effective  as  at 
December 31, 2021.

The  effectiveness  of  the  Company’s  internal  control  over 
financial  reporting  as  at  December  31,  2021  has  been  audited  by 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, 
as  stated  in  their  report  which  is  located  on  pages  153 – 155  of 
Barrick’s 2021 Annual Financial Statements.

Barrick’s  management 
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.

responsible 

for  establishing  and 

is 

Barrick’s  management  assessed 

the  effectiveness  of 
the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  at  
December  31,  2021.  Barrick’s  Management  used  the  Internal 
Control – Integrated Framework (2013) as issued by the Committee 
of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of 
the  Treadway  Commission 
(COSO)  to  evaluate  the  effectiveness  of  Barrick’s  internal  control 

152

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

 
Independent Auditor’s Report

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders  
of Barrick Gold Corporation 

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal 
Control over Financial Reporting
We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets 
of  Barrick  Gold  Corporation  and  its  subsidiaries  (together,  the 
Company)  as  of  December  31,  2021  and  2020,  and  the  related 
consolidated  statements  of 
income, 
changes in equity, and cash flow for the years then ended, including 
the  related  notes  (collectively  referred  to  as  the  consolidated 
financial statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal 
control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2021,  based 
on  criteria  established  in  Internal  Control  –  Integrated  Framework 
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 
Treadway Commission (COSO).

income,  comprehensive 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to 
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position 
of  the  Company  as  of  December  31,  2021  and  2020,  and  its 
financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended 
in  conformity  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards 
as  issued  by  the  International  Accounting  Standards  Board.  Also 
in  our  opinion,  the  Company  maintained,  in  all  material  respects, 
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 
2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated 
Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

financial  reporting, 

internal  control  over 

Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated 
financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over 
financial  reporting,  and  for  its  assessment  of  the  effectiveness 
of 
the 
accompanying  Management’s  Report  on  Internal  Control  over 
Financial  Reporting.  Our  responsibility  is  to  express  opinions  on 
the  Company’s  consolidated  financial  statements  and  on  the 
Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  based  on  our 
audits.  We  are  a  public  accounting  firm  registered  with  the  Public 
Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States)  (PCAOB) 
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in 
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable 
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
and the PCAOB. 

included 

in 

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of 
the  PCAOB.  Those  standards  require  that  we  plan  and  perform 
the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the 
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, 
whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control 
over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. 

Our  audits  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements  included 
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement 
of  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  whether  due  to  error  or 
fraud,  and  performing  procedures  that  respond  to  those  risks. 
Such  procedures  included  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence 
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial 
statements.  Our  audits  also  included  evaluating  the  accounting 
principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management, 
as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall  presentation  of  the  consolidated 
financial  statements.  Our  audit  of  internal  control  over  financial 
reporting  included  obtaining  an  understanding  of  internal  control 
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness 
exists,  and  testing  and  evaluating  the  design  and  operating 
effectiveness  of  internal  control  based  on  the  assessed  risk.  Our 
audits  also  included  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we 
considered  necessary  in  the  circumstances.  We  believe  that  our 
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over 
Financial Reporting
A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  a  process 
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability 
of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements 
for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted 
accounting  principles.  A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial 
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to 
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and 
fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and  dispositions  of  the  assets  of  the 
company;  (ii)  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are 
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements 
in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  and 
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only 
in  accordance  with  authorizations  of  management  and  directors 
of  the  company;  and  (iii)  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding 
prevention  or  timely  detection  of  unauthorized  acquisition,  use, 
or  disposition  of  the  company’s  assets  that  could  have  a  material 
effect on the financial statements. 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial 
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections 
of  any  evaluation  of  effectiveness  to  future  periods  are  subject  to 
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes 
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or 
procedures may deteriorate.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 153

Independent Auditor’s Report Addressing 

the  matter 

involved  performing  procedures 
and  evaluating  audit  evidence  in  connection  with  forming  our 
overall  opinion  on  the  consolidated  financial  statements.  These 
procedures  included  testing  the  effectiveness  of  controls  relating 
to  management’s  impairment  (impairment  reversal)  assessments 
for  goodwill  and  other  non-current  assets,  including  controls  over 
the  significant  assumptions  used  in  management’s  estimates  of 
the FVLCD of the CGUs. These procedures also included, among 
others,  testing  management’s  process  for  estimating  the  FVLCD 
of  the  CGUs  with  goodwill  and  for  each  CGU  where  there  is  an 
indicator  of  impairment  (or  impairment  reversal);  evaluating  the 
appropriateness of the methods and discounted cash flow models 
used;  testing  the  completeness  and  accuracy  of  underlying  data 
used  in  the  models  and  evaluating  the  reasonableness  of  the 
significant  assumptions  used  by  management  in  the  estimates 
of  FVLCD.  Evaluating  the  reasonableness  of  the  significant 
assumptions used by management in the estimates of FVLCD with 
respect to future metal prices, operating and capital costs and NAV 
multiples  involved  (i)  comparing  future  metal  prices  to  external 
industry  data;  (ii)  comparing  operating  and  capital  costs  to  recent 
actual operating and capital costs incurred and assessing whether 
these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other 
areas  of  the  audit,  where  appropriate;  and  (iii)  comparing  NAV 
multiples to evidence of value from comparable market information. 
The work of management’s specialists was used in performing the 
procedures  to  evaluate  the  reasonableness  of  future  production 
levels,  including  mineral  reserves  and  mineral  resources,  and 
the  fair  value  of  mineral  resources  outside  LOM  plans  for  certain 
CGUs. As a basis for using this work, the management’s specialists’ 
qualifications were understood and the Company’s relationship with 
management’s specialists was assessed. The procedures performed 
also included evaluation of the methods and assumptions used by 
management’s specialists, tests of the data used by management’s 
specialists  and  an  evaluation  of  management’s  specialists’ 
findings.  Professionals  with  specialized  skill  and  knowledge  were 
used  to  assist  in  evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  the  methods 
and  discounted  cash  flow  models  and  the  reasonableness  of  the 
weighted average costs of capital and NAV multiple assumptions.

Uncertain tax positions 
As described in Notes 2, 3, 30 and 35 to the consolidated financial 
statements,  the  Company  is  subject  to  assessments  by  various 
taxation  authorities,  who  may  interpret  tax  legislation  differently 
than  the  Company.  As  disclosed  by  management,  the  Company 
operates  in  certain  jurisdictions  that  have  increased  degrees 
of  political  and  sovereign  risk  and  while  host  governments  have 
historically  supported 
the  development  of  natural  resources 
by  foreign  companies,  tax  legislation  in  these  jurisdictions  is 
developing.  Management  is  required  to  assess  uncertainties  and 
make  significant  judgments  when  assessing  the  outcome  and 
amounts  recorded  for  uncertain  tax  positions.  If  actual  results  
are  significantly  different  from  the  Company’s  assessments,  this 
could  necessitate  future  adjustments  to  tax  income  and  expense 
already recorded. 

Critical Audit Matters

The  critical  audit  matters  communicated  below  are  matters 
arising  from  the  current  period  audit  of  the  consolidated  financial 
statements that were communicated or required to be communicated 
to  the  Audit  &  Risk  Committee  and  that  (i)  relate  to  accounts 
or  disclosures  that  are  material  to  the  consolidated  financial 
statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, 
or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters 
does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial 
statements,  taken  as  a  whole,  and  we  are  not,  by  communicating 
the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the 
critical  audit  matters  or  on  the  accounts  or  disclosures  to  which 
they relate. 

Impairment (impairment reversal) assessments for goodwill 
and other non-current assets
As described in Notes 2, 3, 20 and 21 to the consolidated financial 
statements,  the  Company’s  goodwill  and  other  non-current  assets 
are tested for impairment if there is an indicator of impairment and 
in  the  case  of  goodwill  annually  during  the  fourth  quarter.  Other 
non-current assets are tested for impairment reversal if there is an 
indicator of reversal of impairment. Goodwill impairment charges are 
not  reversible.  Impairment  assessments  and  impairment  reversal 
assessments  are  conducted  at  the  level  of  the  cash  generating 
unit  (CGU),  which  is  the  lowest  level  for  which  identifiable  cash 
flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and 
includes  most  liabilities  specific  to  the  CGU.  For  operating  mines 
and  projects,  the  individual  mine/project  represents  a  CGU  for 
impairment and impairment reversal assessments. The Company’s 
goodwill and other non-current assets balances as of December 31, 
2021 were $4.8 billion and $32.8 billion, respectively. Management 
estimated the recoverable amounts of the CGUs as the Fair Value 
Less  Costs  of  Disposal  (FVLCD)  using  discounted  estimates  of 
future  cash flows derived from the most recent life of mine (LOM) 
plans, estimated fair values of mineral resources outside LOM plans 
and the application of a specific Net Asset Value (NAV) multiple for 
each  CGU,  where  applicable.  Management’s  estimates  of  FVLCD 
of the CGUs included significant assumptions with respect to future 
metal  prices,  operating  and  capital  costs,  weighted  average  costs 
of capital, NAV multiples, future production levels, including mineral 
reserves  and  mineral  resources,  and  the  fair  value  of  mineral 
resources  outside  LOM  plans,  where  applicable.  Management’s 
estimates  of  future  production  levels,  including  mineral  reserves 
and  mineral  resources,  and  the  fair  value  of  mineral  resources 
outside LOM plans, are based on information compiled by qualified 
persons (management’s specialists).
The  principal  considerations 

that 
performing  procedures  relating  to  the  impairment  (impairment 
reversal)  assessments  for  goodwill  and  other  non-current  assets 
is  a  critical  audit  matter  are  (i)  the  significant  judgment  by 
management,  including  the  use  of  management’s  specialists,  in 
estimating  the  FVLCD  of  the  CGUs;  (ii)  a  high  degree  of  auditor 
judgment,  subjectivity  and  effort  in  performing  procedures  and 
evaluating  management’s  significant  assumptions  with  respect  to 
future metal prices, operating and capital costs, weighted average 
costs  of  capital,  NAV  multiples,  future  production  levels,  including 
mineral  reserves  and  mineral  resources,  and  the  fair  value  of 
mineral  resources  outside  LOM  plans,  where  applicable;  and  (iii) 
the  audit  effort  involved  the  use  of  professionals  with  specialized 
skill and knowledge. 

for  our  determination 

154

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Independent Auditor’s Reportfor  our  determination 

The  principal  considerations 

that 
performing procedures relating to uncertain tax positions is a critical 
audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when 
assessing  the  outcome  and  amounts  recorded  for  uncertain  tax 
positions,  which  include  a  high  degree  of  estimation  uncertainty; 
(ii)  a  high  degree  of  auditor  judgment,  subjectivity  and  effort  in 
timely 
performing  procedures  and  evaluating  management’s 
identification,  recognition  and  accurate  measurement  of  uncertain 
tax  positions;  (iii)  the  evaluation  of  audit  evidence  available  to 
support the amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions is complex 
and  resulted  in  significant  auditor  judgment  as  the  nature  of  the 
evidence is often highly subjective; and (iv) the audit effort involved 
the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge. 

Addressing 

the  matter 

involved  performing  procedures 
and  evaluating  audit  evidence  in  connection  with  forming  our 
overall  opinion  on  the  consolidated  financial  statements.  These 
procedures  included  testing  the  effectiveness  of  controls  relating 
to  the  identification  and  recognition  of  the  amounts  recorded  for 
uncertain  tax  positions,  controls  addressing  the  completeness  of 
the uncertain tax positions, and controls over the measurement of 
the amounts recorded, as well as consolidated financial statement 
disclosures. These procedures also included, among others, testing 
the  information  used  in  the  calculations  of  the  amounts  recorded 
for uncertain tax positions; testing the calculations of the amounts 
recorded  for  uncertain  tax  positions  by  jurisdiction,  including 
management’s assessment of the technical merits of tax positions; 
testing  the  completeness  of  management’s  assessment  of  both 
the identification of uncertain tax positions and possible outcomes 
of  each  uncertain  tax  position  by  reading  correspondence  with 
taxation  authorities;  and  evaluating  the  related  disclosures  in  the 
consolidated  financial  statements.  Professionals  with  specialized 
skill  and  knowledge  were  used  to  assist  in  evaluating  the  status 
including  obtaining  
and  results  of 
to  management’s 
and  reading  external 
positions,  where  applicable.  These  professionals  with  specialized 
skill  and  knowledge  were  also  used  to  assist  in  evaluating  the 
completeness  and  measurement  of  the  Company’s  uncertain  tax 
positions, including evaluating the reasonableness of management’s 
assessment of whether tax positions are probable of being accepted 
by the taxation authority, the application of relevant tax legislation, 
and estimated interest and penalties.

tax  assessments 
legal  advice  related 

income 

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto, Canada
February 15, 2022

We have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1982. We 
have not been able to determine the specific year we began serving 
as auditor of the Company.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 155

Independent Auditor’s Report Consolidated Statements of Income

Barrick Gold Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States dollars, except per share data)

Revenue (notes 5 and 6)

Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (notes 5 and 7)
General and administrative expenses (note 11)
Exploration, evaluation and project expenses (notes 5 and 8)
Impairment reversals (note 10)
Loss on currency translation
Closed mine rehabilitation (note 27b)
Income from equity investees (note 16)
Other (income) expense (note 9)

Income before finance items and income taxes
Finance costs, net (note 14)

Income before income taxes
Income tax expense (note 12)

Net income
Attributable to:
Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation 
Non-controlling interests (note 32)
Earnings (loss) per share data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation (note 13) 

Net income

  Basic
  Diluted

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2021

$ 11,985

2020
$ 12,595

7,089
151
287
(63)
29
18
(446)
(67)

4,987

(355)

4,632

(1,344)
$  3,288

$  2,022
$  1,266

7,417
185
295
(269)
50
90
(288)
(178)

5,293

(347)

4,946

(1,332)
$  3,614

$  2,324
$  1,290

$  1.14
$  1.14

$  1.31
$  1.31

156

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements  
of Comprehensive Income

Barrick Gold Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States dollars)

Net income

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
  Unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax $nil and $nil
  Realized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax $nil and $nil
  Currency translation adjustments, net of tax $nil and $nil 

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:
  Actuarial gain (loss) on post-employment benefit obligations, net of tax ($1) and $1

  Net change in value of equity investments, net of tax $8 and ($38)

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

Total comprehensive income

Attributable to:
Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation

Non-controlling interests

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2021

$  3,288

2020

$  3,614

–
3
2

2

(44)

(37)

(3)
4
(7)

(6)

148

136

$  3,251

$  3,750

$  1,985

$  1,266

$  2,460

$  1,290

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 157

Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

Barrick Gold Corporation
For the years ended December 31 (in millions of United States dollars)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income

Adjustments for the following items:

Depreciation

Finance costs (note 14)

Net impairment reversals (note 10)

Income tax expense (note 12)
Income from investment in equity investees (note 16)
Loss on currency translation

Gain on sale of non-current assets (note 9)

Change in working capital (note 15)

Other operating activities (note 15) 

Operating cash flows before interest and income taxes

Interest paid 
Income taxes paid1

Net cash provided by operating activities

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Property, plant and equipment

Capital expenditures (note 5)

Sales proceeds

Divestitures (note 4)

Investment (purchases) sales

Dividends received from equity method investments 
Shareholder loan repayments from equity method investments

Net cash used in investing activities 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Lease repayments

Debt repayments 

Dividends (note 31)

Return of capital (note 31)

Funding from non-controlling interests (note 32)
Disbursements to non-controlling interests (note 32)
Other financing activities (note 15) 

Net cash used in financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents 

Cash and equivalents at beginning of year (note 25a)

Cash and equivalents at the end of year 

2021

2020

$  3,288

$  3,614

2,102

390

(63)

1,344
(446)
29

(213)
(273)

(203)

5,955

(303)

(1,274)

4,378

2,208

364

(269)

1,332
(288)
50

(180)
(211)

(190)

6,430

(295)

(718)

5,417

(2,435)

(2,054)

35

27

(46)

520
2

(1,897)

(20)

(7)

(634)

(750)

12

(1,104)
115

(2,388)

(1)

92

5,188

$  5,280

45

283

220

141
79

(1,286)

(26)

(353)

(547)

–

11
(1,367)
28

(2,254)

(3)

1,874

3,314

$  5,188

1  Income taxes paid excludes $69 million (2020: $203 million) of income taxes payable that were settled against offsetting VAT receivables.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

158

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Financial Statements 
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets

Barrick Gold Corporation
As at December 31 (in millions of United States dollars)

ASSETS
Current assets

  Cash and equivalents (note 25a)

  Accounts receivable (note 18)

Inventories (note 17)

  Other current assets (note 18)

Total current assets 

Non-current assets

  Non-current portion of inventory (note 17)

  Equity in investees (note 16)

  Property, plant and equipment (note 19)

Intangible assets (note 20a)

  Goodwill (note 20b)

  Deferred income tax assets (note 30)

  Other assets (note 22)

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities

  Accounts payable (note 23)

  Debt (note 25b)

  Current income tax liabilities

  Other current liabilities (note 24)

Total current liabilities 
Non-current liabilities

  Debt (note 25b)

  Provisions (note 27)

  Deferred income tax liabilities (note 30)

  Other liabilities (note 29)

Total liabilities
Equity

Capital stock (note 31)
Deficit
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

Other

Total equity attributable to Barrick Gold Corporation shareholders
  Non-controlling interests (note 32)

Total equity
Contingencies and commitments (notes 2, 17, 19 and 36)

Total liabilities and equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Signed on behalf of the Board,

Mark Bristow, Director 

J. Brett Harvey, Director

2021

2020

$  5,280

$  5,188

623

1,734

612

8,249

2,636

4,594

24,954

150

4,769

29

1,509

558

1,878

519

8,143

2,566

4,670

24,628

169

4,769

98

1,463

$ 46,890

$ 46,506

$  1,448

$  1,458

15

285

338

2,086

5,135

2,768

3,293

1,301

14,583

28,497

(6,566)
(23)

1,949

23,857

8,450

32,307

20

436

306

2,220

5,135

3,139

3,034

1,268

14,796

29,236
(7,949)
14

2,040

23,341

8,369

31,710

$ 46,890

$ 46,506

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 159

Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements  
of Changes in Equity

Barrick Gold Corporation
(in millions of United States dollars)

Common 
Shares  
(in thousands)

Capital 
stock

Deficit

Accumulated 
other 
comprehensive 
(loss) income1

Total equity 
attributable to 
shareholders

Non- 
controlling 
interests

Other2

Total  
equity

Attributable to equity holders of the Company 

At January 1, 2021

1,778,190   $ 29,236   $  (7,949) 

$  14   $ 2,040  

Net income
Total other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income

  Transactions with owners
  Dividends (note 31)

  Return of capital (note 31)

 Acquisition of South Arturo  
  non-controlling interest (note 4)
 Issued on exercise of stock options

 Funding from non-controlling  

interests (note 32)

 Disbursements to non-controlling 

interests (note 32)

 Dividend reinvestment plan (note 31)

  Share-based payments

–
–
–   $ 

2,022
–

–
–
–   $  2,022  

–
(37)
$  (37)  $ 

–

–

–
50

–

–

192

899

–

(750)

–
–

–

–

5

6

(634)

–

–
–

–

–

(5)

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–
–
–  

–

–

(85)
–

–

–

–

(6)

$  23,341   $  8,369   $ 31,710
3,288
(37)
$  1,985   $  1,266   $  3,251

2,022
(37)

1,266
–

(634)

(750)

(85)
–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(86)
–

12

(634)

(750)

(171)
–

12

(1,111)

(1,111)

–

–

–

–

  Total transactions with owners

1,141   $ 

(739)  $ 

(639) 

$ 

–   $ 

(91) 

$ 

(1,469)  $ (1,185)  $  (2,654)

At December 31, 2021

1,779,331   $ 28,497   $  (6,566) 

$  (23)  $ 1,949  

$  23,857   $  8,450   $ 32,307

At January 1, 2020
  Net income

  Total other comprehensive income
  Total comprehensive income

  Transactions with owners

  Dividends (note 31)

 Issuance of 16% interest in Tanzania 
  mines (note 21)

 Sale of Acacia exploration properties

 Issued on exercise of stock options

 Funding from non-controlling 

interests (note 32)

 Disbursements to non-controlling 

interests (note 32)

 Dividend reinvestment plan (note 31)

  Share-based payments

1,777,927   $ 29,231   $  (9,722) 

$ (122)  $ 2,045  

–

–
–   $ 

–

2,324

–
–   $  2,324  

–

–

136

$  136   $ 

–

–

–

99

–

–

164

–

–

–

–

1

–

–

4

–

(547)

–

–

–

–

–

(4)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–  

–

–

(13)

–

–

–

–

8

$  21,432   $  8,395   $ 29,827
3,614

1,290

2,324

136

136
$  2,460   $  1,290   $  3,750

–

(547)

–

(547)

–

(13)

1

–

–

–

8

238

238

13

–

11

–

1

11

(1,578)

(1,578)

–

–

–

8

  Total transactions with owners

263   $ 

5   $ 

(551) 

$ 

–   $ 

(5) 

$ 

(551)  $ (1,316)  $  (1,867)

At December 31, 2020

1,778,190   $ 29,236   $  (7,949) 

$  14   $ 2,040  

$  23,341   $  8,369   $ 31,710

1  Includes cumulative translation adjustments as at December 31, 2021: $94 million loss (December 31, 2020: $95 million loss). 
2  Includes additional paid-in capital as at December 31, 2021: $1,911 million (December 31, 2020: $2,002 million). 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

160

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Financial Statements  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated  
Financial Statements

Barrick  Gold  Corporation.  Tabular  dollar  amounts  in  millions 
of  United  States  dollars,  unless  otherwise  shown.  References 
to  A$,  ARS,  C$,  CLP,  DOP,  EUR,  GBP,  PGK,  SAR,  TZS,  XOF, 
ZAR,  and  ZMW  are  to  Australian  dollars,  Argentine  pesos, 
Canadian dollars, Chilean pesos, Dominican pesos, Euros, British 
pound  sterling,  Papua  New  Guinea  kina,  Saudi  riyal,  Tanzanian  
shilling, West African CFA franc, South African rand, and Zambian 
kwacha, respectively.

1.  CORPORATE INFORMATION
Barrick  Gold  Corporation  (“Barrick”,  “we”  or  the  “Company”)  is  a 
corporation  governed  by  the  Business  Corporations  Act  (British 
Columbia). The Company’s corporate office is located at Brookfield 
Place, TD Canada Trust Tower, 161 Bay Street, Suite 3700, Toronto, 
Ontario,  M5J  2S1.  The  Company’s  registered  office  is  925  West 
Georgia Street, Suite 1600, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3L2. 
We are principally engaged in the production and sale of gold and 
copper,  as  well  as  related  activities  such  as  exploration  and  mine 
development. We sell our gold and copper into the world market. 

We  have  ownership  interests  in  producing  gold  mines  that 
are  located  in  Argentina,  Canada,  Côte  d’Ivoire,  the  Democratic 
Republic  of  Congo,  the  Dominican  Republic,  Mali,  Tanzania  and 
the United States. Our mine in Papua New Guinea was placed on 
care and maintenance in April 2020. We have ownership interests 
in producing copper mines in Chile, Saudi Arabia and Zambia. We 
also have exploration and development projects located throughout 
the Americas and Africa. 

2.  MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICY INFORMATION
a)  Statement of Compliance
These  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  prepared 
in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards 
(“IFRS”)  as  issued  by  the  International  Accounting  Standards 
Board  (“IASB”)  under  the  historical  cost  convention,  as  modified 
financial  
by  revaluation  of  derivative  contracts  and  certain 
assets.  Accounting  policies  are  consistently  applied  to  all  years 
presented,  unless  otherwise  stated.  These  consolidated  financial 
statements  were  approved  for  issuance  by  the  Board  of  Directors 
on February 15, 2022.

b)  Basis of Preparation
These  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts 
of  Barrick,  its  subsidiaries  its  share  of  joint  operations  (“JO”) 
and  its  equity  share  of  joint  ventures  (“JV”).  For  non  wholly-
owned,  controlled  subsidiaries,  profit  or  loss  for  the  period  that  is 
attributable to non-controlling interests is typically calculated based 
on the ownership of the minority shareholders in the subsidiary.  

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 161

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsOutlined below is information related to our joint arrangements and entities other than 100% owned Barrick subsidiaries at December 31, 2021: 

Nevada Gold Mines3,4
North Mara3,5
Bulyanhulu3,5
Buzwagi3,5
Loulo-Gounkoto3
Tongon3
Pueblo Viejo3
Norte Abierto Project

Donlin Gold Project
Porgera Mine6,7
Veladero
Kibali8
Jabal Sayid8
Zaldívar8

Place of business

United States 

Tanzania

Tanzania

Tanzania

Mali

Côte d’Ivoire

Dominican Republic

Chile

United States

Papua New Guinea

Argentina

Democratic Republic of Congo

Saudi Arabia

Chile

Entity type

Subsidiary

Subsidiary

Subsidiary

Subsidiary

Subsidiary

Subsidiary

Subsidiary

JO

JO

JO

JO

JV

JV

JV

Economic interest1 
61.5%

84%

84%

84%

80%

89.7%

60%

50%

50%

47.5%

50%

45%

50%

50%

Method2
Consolidation

Consolidation

Consolidation

Consolidation

Consolidation

Consolidation

Consolidation

Our share

Our share

Our share

Our share

Equity Method

Equity Method

Equity Method

1  Unless otherwise noted, all of our JOs are funded by contributions made by the parties sharing joint control in proportion to their economic interest.
2  For our JOs, we recognize our share of any assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the JO.
3   We  consolidate  our  interests  in  Carlin,  Cortez, Turquoise  Ridge,  Phoenix,  Long  Canyon,  North  Mara,  Bulyanhulu,  Buzwagi,  Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon  and 
Pueblo Viejo and record a non-controlling interest for the 38.5%, 38.5%, 38.5%, 38.5%, 38.5%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 20%, 10.3% and 40%, respectively, that we 
do not own. 

4   Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is Nevada Gold Mines’ (“NGM”) 60% interest in South Arturo. On September 7, 2021, NGM announced it had entered  
into an Exchange Agreement with i-80 Gold to acquire the 40% interest in South Arturo that NGM did not already own in exchange for the Lone Tree and 
Buffalo Mountain properties and infrastructure. The exchange transaction closed on October 14, 2021, bringing Barrick’s ownership of South Arturo to 61.5%.
5   As  part  of  the  Framework Agreement  effective  January  1,  2020,  the  Government  of  Tanzania  receives  half  of  the  economic  benefits  from  the  Tanzanian 
operations (Bulyanhulu, Buzwagi and North Mara) from taxes, royalties, clearing fees and participation in all cash distributions made by the mines, after the 
recoupment of capital investments. Earnings are recorded on a proportional basis based on our equity interests each period, with a true-up calculated and 
recorded annually to ensure the terms of the agreement are being fulfilled.

6  We have joint control given that decisions about relevant activities require unanimous consent of the parties to the joint operation.
7   We recognize our share of Porgera on a 47.5% interest basis, reflecting Barrick’s undisputed ownership position prior to April 24, 2020, and the ownership 
position Barrick is asserting in its legal proceedings in the Papua New Guinea (“PNG”) court. On August 16, 2019, the special mining lease (the “SML”) at 
Porgera was terminated and on April 24, 2020, the PNG government indicated that the SML would not be extended. On April 9, 2021, the PNG government 
and Barrick Nuigini Limited (“BNL”), the 95% owner and operator of the Porgera joint venture, agreed on a partnership for the future ownership and operation 
of  the  mine  under  a  binding  Framework  Agreement.  The  Framework  Agreement  was  replaced  by  the  more  detailed  Commencement  Agreement,  which 
became effective on February 3, 2022. Under the terms of the binding Commencement Agreement, ownership of Porgera will be held in a new joint venture 
owned 51% by PNG stakeholders and 49% by BNL or an affiliate. BNL is jointly owned on a 50/50 basis by Barrick and Zijin Mining Group and therefore 
Barrick expects to hold a 24.5% interest in the Porgera mine following the implementation of the Commencement Agreement. BNL will retain operatorship 
of the mine. The parties are working towards the signing of definitive agreements, at which time, full mine recommencement work will begin. For additional 
information, see note 35.

8   Barrick  has  commitments  of  $574  million  relating  to  its  interest  in  the  joint  ventures,  including  purchase  obligations  disclosed  in  note  17  and  capital 

commitments disclosed in note 19.

c)  Business Combinations
On  the  acquisition  of  a  business,  the  acquisition  method  of 
accounting is used.

d)  Foreign Currency Translation
The  functional  currency  of  all  of  our  operations  is  the  US  dollar. 
We  translate  non-US  dollar  balances  for  these  operations  into  
US dollars as follows:

	Q Property,  plant  and  equipment  (“PP&E”),  intangible  assets 
and  equity  method  investments  using  the  rates  at  the  time  of 
acquisition;

	Q Fair  value  through  other  comprehensive  income  (“FVOCI”) 
equity  investments  using  the  closing  exchange  rate  as  at 
the  balance  sheet  date  with  translation  gains  and  losses 
permanently recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”);
	Q Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  using  the  closing  exchange 
rate  as  at  the  balance  sheet  date  with  translation  gains  and 
losses recorded in income tax expense;

	Q Other  assets  and  liabilities  using  the  closing  exchange  rate 
as at the balance sheet date with translation gains and losses 
recorded in other income/expense; and

	Q Income and expenses using the average exchange rate for the 
period, except for expenses that relate to non-monetary assets 
and liabilities measured at historical rates, which are translated 
using the same historical rate as the associated non-monetary 
assets and liabilities.

e)  Revenue Recognition
We  sell  our  production  in  the  world  market  through  the  following 
distribution  channels:  gold  bullion  is  sold  in  the  gold  spot  market, 
to independent refineries or to our non-controlling interest holders; 
and gold and copper concentrate is sold to independent smelting or 
trading companies.

Gold Bullion Sales
Gold  bullion  is  sold  primarily  in  the  London  spot  market. The  sale 
price  is  fixed  on  the  date  of  sale  based  on  the  gold  spot  price. 
Generally, we record revenue from gold bullion sales at the time of 
physical delivery, which is also the date that title to the gold passes.

162

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsConcentrate Sales
Under  the  terms  of  concentrate  sales  contracts  with  independent 
smelting companies, gold and copper sales prices are provisionally 
set  on  a  specified  future  date  after  shipment  based  on  market 
prices.  We  record  revenues  under  these  contracts  at  the  time  of 
shipment,  which  is  also  when  the  risk  and  rewards  of  ownership 
pass  to  the  smelting  companies,  using  forward  market  gold  and 
copper  prices  on  the  expected  date  that  final  sales  prices  will  be 
determined. Variations between the price recorded at the shipment 
date and the actual final price set under the smelting contracts are 
caused by changes in market gold and copper prices, which result 
in the existence of an embedded derivative in accounts receivable. 
The  embedded  derivative  is  recorded  at  fair  value  each  period 
until  final  settlement  occurs,  with  changes  in  fair  value  classified 
as  provisional  price  adjustments  and  included  in  revenue  in  the 
consolidated statement of income and presented separately in note 6  
of these consolidated financial statements.

Streaming Arrangements
As the deferred revenue on streaming arrangements is considered 
variable  consideration,  an  adjustment  is  made  to  the  transaction 
price  per  unit  each  time  there  is  a  change  in  the  underlying 
production profile of a mine (typically in the fourth quarter of each 
year).  The  change  in  the  transaction  price  per  unit  results  in  a 
cumulative  catch-up  adjustment  to  revenue  in  the  period  in  which 
the change is made, reflecting the new production profile expected 
to  be  delivered  under  the  streaming  agreement.  A  corresponding 
cumulative  catch-up  adjustment  is  made  to  accretion  expense, 
reflecting the impact of the change in the deferred revenue balance. 

f)  Exploration and Evaluation
Exploration expenditures are the costs incurred in the initial search 
for  mineral  deposits  with  economic  potential  or  in  the  process 
of  obtaining  more  information  about  existing  mineral  deposits. 
Exploration  expenditures  typically  include  costs  associated  with 
prospecting,  sampling,  mapping,  diamond  drilling  and  other  work 
involved in searching for ore.

Evaluation expenditures are the costs incurred to establish the 
technical  and  commercial  viability  of  developing  mineral  deposits 
identified through exploration activities or by acquisition. Evaluation 
expenditures include the cost of (i) establishing the volume and grade  
of deposits through drilling of core samples, trenching and sampling 
activities in an ore body that is classified as either a mineral resource 
or  a  proven  and  probable  reserve;  (ii)  determining  the  optimal 
methods  of  extraction  and  metallurgical  and  treatment  processes; 
(iii)  studies  related  to  surveying,  transportation  and  infrastructure 
requirements; (iv) permitting activities; and (v) economic evaluations  
to  determine  whether  development  of  the  mineralized  material  is 
commercially  justified,  including  scoping,  prefeasibility  and  final 
feasibility studies.

Exploration  and  evaluation  expenditures  are  expensed  as 
incurred  unless  management  determines  that  probable  future 
economic benefits will be generated as a result of the expenditures. 
Once  the  technical  feasibility  and  commercial  viability  of  a 
program  or  project  has  been  demonstrated  with  a  prefeasibility 
study,  and  we  have  recognized  reserves  in  accordance  with  the 
Canadian  Securities Administrators’  National  Instrument  43-101  – 
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, we account for future 
expenditures incurred in the development of that program or project 
in accordance with our policy for Property, Plant and Equipment, as 
described in note 2l.

g)  Production Stage
A  mine  that  is  under  construction  is  determined  to  enter  the 
production  stage  when  the  project  is  in  the  location  and  condition 
necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended 
by  management.  We  use  the  following  factors  to  assess  whether 
these  criteria  have  been  met:  (1)  the  level  of  capital  expenditures 
compared  to  construction  cost  estimates;  (2)  the  completion  of 
a  reasonable  period  of  commissioning  and  testing  of  mine  plant 
and  equipment;  (3)  the  ability  to  produce  minerals  in  saleable 

form  (within  specifications);  and  (4)  the  ability  to  sustain  ongoing 
production of minerals.

When  a  mine  construction  project  moves  into  the  production 
stage, the capitalization of certain mine construction costs ceases 
and  costs  are  either  capitalized  to  inventory  or  expensed,  except 
for  capitalizable  costs  related  to  property,  plant  and  equipment 
additions or improvements, open pit stripping activities that provide 
a  future  benefit,  underground  mine  development  or  expenditures 
that  meet  the  criteria  for  capitalization  in  accordance  with  IAS  16 
Property, Plant and Equipment.

h)  Taxation
Current  tax  for  each  taxable  entity  is  based  on  the  local  taxable 
income  at  the  local  statutory  tax  rate  enacted  or  substantively 
enacted at the balance sheet date and includes adjustments to tax 
payable or recoverable in respect of previous periods.

Deferred  tax  is  recognized  using  the  balance  sheet  method  in 
respect of all temporary differences between the tax bases of assets 
and  liabilities,  and  their  carrying  amounts  for  financial  reporting 
purposes, except as indicated below.

Deferred  income  tax  liabilities  are  recognized  for  all  taxable 

temporary differences, except:

	Q Where  the  deferred  income  tax  liability  arises  from  the  initial 
recognition of goodwill, or the initial recognition of an asset or 
liability in an acquisition that is not a business combination and, 
at  the  time  of  the  acquisition,  affects  neither  the  accounting 
profit nor taxable profit or loss; and

	Q In  respect  of  taxable  temporary  differences  associated  with 
investments in subsidiaries and interests in joint arrangements, 
where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can 
be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences 
will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred  income  tax  assets  are  recognized  for  all  deductible 
temporary  differences  and  the  carry  forward  of  unused  tax  assets 
and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable 
profit  will  be  available  against  which  the  deductible  temporary 
differences and the carry forward of unused tax assets and unused 
tax losses can be utilized, except:

	Q Where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible 
temporary  difference  arises  from  the  initial  recognition  of 
an  asset  or  liability  in  an  acquisition  that  is  not  a  business 
combination and, at the time of the acquisition, affects neither 
the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and

	Q In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with 
investments in subsidiaries and interests in joint arrangements, 
deferred  tax  assets  are  recognized  only  to  the  extent  that  it 
is  probable  that  the  temporary  differences  will  reverse  in  the 
foreseeable  future  and  taxable  profit  will  be  available  against 
which the temporary differences can be utilized.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at 
each  balance  sheet  date  and  reduced  to  the  extent  that  it  is  no 
longer  probable  that  sufficient  taxable  profit  will  be  available  to 
allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized. To 
the extent that an asset not previously recognized fulfills the criteria 
for recognition, a deferred income tax asset is recorded.

Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis at the tax 
rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which the asset is 
realized  or  the  liability  is  settled,  based  on  tax  rates  and  tax  laws 
enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. 

Current  and  deferred  tax  relating  to  items  recognized  directly 
in equity are recognized in equity and not in the income statement.
The  Company  is  subject  to  assessments  by  various  taxation 
authorities,  who  may  interpret  tax  legislation  differently  than  the 
Company. Tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adjusted by 
the Company to reflect its best estimate of the probable outcome of 
assessments and in light of changing facts and circumstances, such 
as the completion of a tax audit, expiration of a statute of limitations, 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 163

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsthe refinement of an estimate, and interest accruals associated with 
the  uncertain  tax  positions  until  they  are  resolved.  Some  of  these 
adjustments  require  significant  judgment  in  estimating  the  timing 
and amount of any additional tax expense. 

Royalties and Special Mining Taxes
Income  tax  expense  includes  the  cost  of  royalties  and  special 
mining 
that  are  calculated  
based  on  a  percentage  of  taxable  profit  whereby  taxable  profit 
represents  net  income  adjusted  for  certain  items  defined  in  the 
applicable legislation.

to  governments 

taxes  payable 

	Q  Net profits interest (“NPI”) royalty to a party other  

than a government,

	Q Modified net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty,
	Q Net smelter return sliding scale (“NSRSS”) royalty,
	Q Gross proceeds sliding scale (“GPSS”) royalty,
	Q Gross smelter return (“GSR”) royalty,
	Q Net value (“NV”) royalty,
	Q Land tenement (“LT”) royalty, and a
	Q Gold revenue royalty.

Indirect Taxes
Indirect  tax  recoverable  is  recorded  at  its  undiscounted  amount, 
and  is  disclosed  as  non-current  if  not  expected  to  be  recovered 
within twelve months.

l)  Property, Plant and Equipment

Estimated Useful Lives of Major Asset Categories

i)  Other Investments 
Investments  in  publicly  quoted  equity  securities  that  are  neither 
subsidiaries nor associates are categorized as FVOCI pursuant to 
the irrevocable election available in IFRS 9 for these instruments. 
FVOCI  equity  investments  are  recorded  at  fair  value  with  all 
realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded permanently in 
OCI. Warrant investments are classified as fair value through profit 
or loss (“FVPL”). 

j)  Inventory
Material  extracted  from  our  mines  is  classified  as  either  ore  or 
waste.  Ore  represents  material  that,  at  the  time  of  extraction,  we 
expect  to  process  into  a  saleable  form  and  sell  at  a  profit.  Raw 
materials are comprised of both ore in stockpiles and ore on leach 
pads as processing is required to extract benefit from the ore. Ore 
is accumulated in stockpiles that are subsequently processed into 
gold/copper  in  a  saleable  form.  The  recovery  of  gold  and  copper 
from  certain  oxide  ores  is  achieved  through  the  heap  leaching 
process. Work in process represents gold/copper in the processing 
circuit  that  has  not  completed  the  production  process,  and  is  not 
yet  in  a  saleable  form.  Finished  goods  inventory  represents  gold/
copper in saleable form.

Metal  inventories  are  valued  at  the  lower  of  cost  and  net 
realizable  value.  Cost  is  determined  on  a  weighted  average  basis 
and  includes  all  costs  incurred,  based  on  a  normal  production 
capacity,  in  bringing  each  product  to  its  present  location  and 
condition.  Cost  of  inventories  comprises  direct  labor,  materials 
and contractor expenses, including non-capitalized stripping costs; 
depreciation on PP&E including capitalized stripping costs; and an 
allocation  of  general  and  administrative  costs. As  ore  is  removed 
for  processing,  costs  are  removed  based  on  the  average  cost  per 
ounce/pound  in  the  stockpile.  Net  realizable  value  is  determined 
with  reference  to  relevant  market  prices  less  applicable  variable 
selling and processing costs.

Mine  operating  supplies  represent  commodity  consumables 
and other raw materials used in the production process, as well as 
spare parts and other maintenance supplies that are not classified 
as capital items. Provisions are recorded to reduce mine operating 
supplies  to  net  realizable  value,  which  is  generally  calculated  by 
reference to its salvage or scrap value, when it is determined that 
the  supplies  are  obsolete.  Inventory  provisions  are  reversed  to 
reflect  subsequent  recoveries  in  net  realizable  value  where  the 
inventory is still on hand.

k)  Royalties
Certain of our properties are subject to royalty arrangements based 
on mineral production at the properties. The primary type of royalty 
is  a  net  smelter  return  (“NSR”)  royalty.  Under  this  type  of  royalty 
we pay the holder an amount calculated as the royalty percentage 
multiplied  by  the  value  of  gold  production  at  market  gold  prices 
less third-party smelting, refining and transportation costs. Royalty 
expense  is  recorded  on  completion  of  the  production  or  sales 
process in cost of sales. Other types of royalties include:

Buildings, plant and equipment
Underground mobile equipment

Light vehicles and other mobile equipment  

Furniture, computer and office equipment

1 – 38 years
3 – 7 years

1 – 7 years

1 – 7 years

Buildings, Plant and Equipment
At  acquisition,  we  record  buildings,  plant  and  equipment  at  cost, 
including  all  expenditures  incurred  to  prepare  an  asset  for  its 
intended  use.  These  expenditures  consist  of:  the  purchase  price; 
brokers’ commissions; and installation costs including architectural, 
design  and  engineering  fees,  legal  fees,  survey  costs,  site 
preparation  costs,  freight  charges,  transportation  insurance  costs, 
duties, testing and preparation charges.

Buildings,  plant  and  equipment  are  depreciated  on  a  straight-
line  basis  over  their  expected  useful  life,  which  commences  
when the assets are considered available for use. Once buildings, 
plant  and  equipment  are  considered  available  for  use,  they  are 
measured  at  cost  less  accumulated  depreciation  and  applicable 
impairment losses.

Depreciation  on  equipment  utilized  in  the  development  of 
assets,  including  open  pit  and  underground  mine  development,  is 
recapitalized as development costs attributable to the related asset.

Mineral Properties
Mineral  properties  consist  of:  the  fair  value  attributable  to  mineral 
reserves  and  resources  acquired  in  a  business  combination  or 
asset  acquisition;  underground  mine  development  costs;  open  pit 
mine  development  costs;  capitalized  exploration  and  evaluation 
costs;  and  capitalized  interest.  In  addition,  we  incur  project  costs 
which  are  generally  capitalized  when  the  expenditures  result  in  a 
future benefit.

i)  Acquired Mining Properties
On  acquisition  of  a  mining  property,  we  prepare  an  estimate 
of  the  fair  value  attributable  to  the  proven  and  probable  mineral 
reserves,  mineral  resources  and  exploration  potential  attributable 
to the property. The estimated fair value attributable to the mineral 
reserves  and  the  portion  of  mineral  resources  considered  to  be 
probable  of  economic  extraction  at  the  time  of  the  acquisition  is 
depreciated  on  a  units  of  production  (“UOP”)  basis  whereby  the 
denominator is the proven and probable reserves and the portion of 
mineral resources considered to be probable of economic extraction 
based on the current life of mine (“LOM”) plan that benefit from the 
development and are considered probable of economic extraction. 
The estimated fair value attributable to mineral resources that are 
not  considered  to  be  probable  of  economic  extraction  at  the  time 
of the acquisition is not subject to depreciation until the resources 
become  probable  of  economic  extraction  in  the  future.  The 
estimated fair value attributable to exploration licenses is recorded 
as  an  intangible  asset  and  is  not  subject  to  depreciation  until  the 
property enters production.

164

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
ii) Underground Mine Development Costs
At our underground mines, we incur development costs to build new 
shafts, drifts and ramps that will enable us to physically access ore 
underground. The  time  over  which  we  will  continue  to  incur  these 
costs  depends  on  the  mine  life.  These  underground  development 
costs are capitalized as incurred.

Capitalized underground development costs are depreciated on 
a  UOP  basis,  whereby  the  denominator  is  the  estimated  ounces/
pounds  of  gold/copper  in  proven  and  probable  reserves  and  the 
portion  of  resources  considered  probable  of  economic  extraction 
based on the current LOM plan that benefit from the development 
and are considered probable of economic extraction.

iii) Open Pit Mine Development Costs
In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove overburden 
and  other  waste  materials  to  access  ore  from  which  minerals  can 
be  extracted  economically.  The  process  of  mining  overburden  
and  waste  materials  is  referred  to  as  stripping.  Stripping  costs 
incurred in order to provide initial access to the ore body (referred 
to  as  pre-production  stripping)  are  capitalized  as  open  pit  mine 
development costs.

Pre-production  stripping  costs  are  capitalized  until  an  “other 
than  de  minimis”  level  of  mineral  is  extracted,  after  which  time 
such costs are either capitalized to inventory or, if it qualifies as an 
open  pit  stripping  activity  that  provides  a  future  benefit,  to  PP&E. 
We  consider  various  relevant  criteria  to  assess  when  an  “other 
than de minimis” level of mineral is produced. Some of the criteria 
considered would include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) 
the amount of minerals mined versus total ounces in ore expected 
over the LOM; (2) the amount of ore tonnes mined versus total LOM 
expected  ore  tonnes  mined;  (3)  the  current  stripping  ratio  versus 
the strip ratio expected over the LOM; and (4) the ore grade mined 
versus the grade expected over the LOM.

Stripping costs incurred during the production stage of an open 
pit are accounted for as costs of the inventory produced during the 
period that the stripping costs are incurred, unless these costs are 
expected  to  provide  a  future  economic  benefit  to  an  identifiable 
component of the ore body. Components of the ore body are based 
on the distinct development phases identified by the mine planning 
engineers  when  determining  the  optimal  development  plan  for 
the  open  pit.  Production  phase  stripping  costs  generate  a  future 
economic  benefit  when  the  related  stripping  activity:  (1)  improves 
access  to  a  component  of  the  ore  body  to  be  mined  in  the  future; 
(2)  increases  the  fair  value  of  the  mine  (or  open  pit)  as  access  to 
future mineral reserves becomes less costly; and (3) increases the 
productive  capacity  or  extends  the  productive  life  of  the  mine  (or 
open  pit).  Production  phase  stripping  costs  that  are  expected  to 
generate a future economic benefit are capitalized as open pit mine 
development costs.

Capitalized  open  pit  mine  development  costs  are  depreciated 
on a UOP basis whereby the denominator is the estimated ounces/
pounds  of  gold/copper  in  proven  and  probable  reserves  and  the 
portion  of  resources  considered  probable  of  economic  extraction 
based on the current LOM plan that benefit from the development 
and are considered probable of economic extraction.

Construction-in-Progress
Assets  under  construction  are  capitalized  as  construction-in-
progress until the asset is available for use. The cost of construction-
in-progress  comprises  its  purchase  price  and  any  costs  directly 
attributable to bringing it into working condition for its intended use. 
Construction-in-progress amounts related to development projects 
are  included  in  the  carrying  amount  of  the  development  project. 
Construction-in-progress  amounts  incurred  at  operating  mines 
are  presented  as  a  separate  asset  within  PP&E.  Construction-in-
progress  also  includes  deposits  on  long  lead  items.  Construction-
in-progress is not depreciated. Depreciation commences once the 
asset is complete, commissioned and available for use.

Capitalized Interest
We  capitalize  interest  costs  for  qualifying  assets.  Qualifying  
assets  are  assets  that  require  a  significant  amount  of  time  to 
prepare  for  their  intended  use,  including  projects  that  are  in  the 
exploration  and  evaluation,  development  or  construction  stages. 
Qualifying  assets  also  include  significant  expansion  projects  at 
our  operating  mines.  Capitalized  interest  costs  are  considered  an 
element  of  the  cost  of  the  qualifying  asset  which  is  determined 
based  on  gross  expenditures  incurred  on  an  asset.  Capitalization 
ceases  when  the  asset  is  substantially  complete  or  if  active 
development  is  suspended  or  ceases.  Where  the  funds  used  to 
finance  a  qualifying  asset  form  part  of  general  borrowings,  the 
amount capitalized is calculated using a weighted average of rates 
applicable  to  the  relevant  borrowings  during  the  period.  Where 
funds  borrowed  are  directly  attributable  to  a  qualifying  asset,  the 
amount capitalized represents the borrowing costs specific to those 
borrowings. Where surplus funds available out of money borrowed 
specifically  to  finance  a  project  are  temporarily  invested,  the  total 
capitalized interest is reduced by income generated from short-term 
investments of such funds. 

m)   Impairment (and Reversals of Impairment)  

of Non-Current Assets

We  review  and  test  the  carrying  amounts  of  PP&E  and  intangible 
assets with finite lives when an indicator of impairment is considered 
to  exist.  Impairment  assessments  on  PP&E  and  intangible  assets 
are  conducted  at  the  level  of  the  cash  generating  unit  (“CGU”), 
which is the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely 
independent  of  the  cash  flows  of  other  assets  and  includes  most 
liabilities specific to the CGU. For operating mines and projects, the 
individual mine/project represents a CGU for impairment testing.

The recoverable amount of a CGU is the higher of Value in Use 
(“VIU”) and Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal (“FVLCD”). We have 
determined that the FVLCD is greater than the VIU amounts and is 
therefore  used  as  the  recoverable  amount  for  impairment  testing 
purposes. An  impairment  loss  is  recognized  for  any  excess  of  the 
carrying amount of a CGU over its recoverable amount where both 
the recoverable amount and carrying value include the associated 
other assets and liabilities, including taxes where applicable, of the 
CGU. Where it is not appropriate to allocate the loss to a separate 
asset,  an  impairment  loss  related  to  a  CGU  is  allocated  to  the 
carrying amount of the assets of the CGU on a pro rata basis based 
on the carrying amount of its non-monetary assets.

Impairment Reversal
An assessment is made at each reporting date to determine whether 
there is an indication that previously recognized impairment losses 
may no longer exist or may have decreased. A previously recognized 
impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the 
assumptions  used  to  determine  the  CGU’s  recoverable  amount 
since  the  last  impairment  loss  was  recognized.  This  reversal 
is  recognized  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  and  is 
limited to the carrying value that would have been determined, net 
of  any  depreciation  where  applicable,  had  no  impairment  charge 
been  recognized  in  prior  years.  When  an  impairment  reversal  is 
undertaken,  the  recoverable  amount  is  assessed  by  reference  to 
the higher of VIU and FVLCD. We have determined that the FVLCD 
is  greater  than  the  VIU  amounts  and  is  therefore  used  as  the 
recoverable amount for impairment testing purposes. 

n)  Intangible Assets
On  acquisition  of  a  mineral  property  in  the  exploration  stage,  
we  prepare  an  estimate  of  the  fair  value  attributable  to  the 
exploration  licenses  acquired,  including  the  fair  value  attributable 
to  mineral  resources,  if  any,  of  that  property. The  fair  value  of  the 
exploration  license  is  recorded  as  an  intangible  asset  (acquired 
exploration  potential)  as  at  the  date  of  acquisition.  When  an 
exploration  stage  property  moves  into  development,  the  acquired 
exploration  potential  attributable  to  that  property  is  transferred  to 
mining interests within PP&E.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 165

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsWe  also  have  water  rights  associated  with  our  mineral 
properties. Upon acquisition, they are measured at initial cost and 
are depreciated when they are being used. They are also subject to 
impairment  testing  when  an  indicator  of  impairment  is  considered 
to exist.

o)  Goodwill
Goodwill  is  tested  for  impairment  in  the  fourth  quarter  and  also 
when there is an indicator of impairment. At the date of acquisition, 
goodwill is assigned to the CGU or group of CGUs that is expected 
to  benefit  from  the  synergies  of  the  business  combination.  For 
the  purposes  of  impairment  testing,  goodwill  is  allocated  to  the 
Company’s operating segments, which are our individual minesites, 
and  corresponds  to  the  level  at  which  goodwill  is  internally 
monitored  by  the  Chief  Operating  Decision  Maker  (“CODM”). 
Goodwill impairment charges are not reversible.

p)  Debt
Debt  is  recognized  initially  at  fair  value,  net  of  financing  costs 
incurred,  and  subsequently  measured  at  amortized  cost.  Any 
difference  between  the  amounts  originally  received  and  the 
redemption  value  of  the  debt  is  recognized  in  the  consolidated 
statements of income over the period to maturity using the effective 
interest method.

q)  Environmental Rehabilitation Provision
Mining,  extraction  and  processing  activities  normally  give  rise  to 
obligations  for  environmental  rehabilitation.  Rehabilitation  work 
can  include  facility  decommissioning  and  dismantling;  removal  or 
treatment of waste materials; site and land rehabilitation, including 
compliance  with  and  monitoring  of  environmental  regulations; 
security  and  other  site-related  costs  required  to  perform  the 
rehabilitation work; and operation of equipment designed to reduce 
or eliminate environmental effects. The extent of work required and 
the associated costs are dependent on the requirements of relevant 
authorities and our environmental policies. Routine operating costs 
that  may  impact  the  ultimate  closure  and  rehabilitation  activities, 
such  as  waste  material  handling  conducted  as  an  integral  part  of 
a  mining  or  production  process,  are  not  included  in  the  provision. 
Abnormal costs arising from unforeseen circumstances, such as the 
contamination  caused  by  unplanned  discharges,  are  recognized 
as  an  expense  and  liability  when  the  event  that  gives  rise  to  an 
obligation occurs and reliable estimates of the required rehabilitation 
costs can be made.

Provisions  for  the  cost  of  each  rehabilitation  program  are 
normally recognized at the time that an environmental disturbance 
occurs  or  a  new  legal  or  constructive  obligation  is  determined. 
When  the  extent  of  disturbance  increases  over  the  life  of  an 
operation,  the  provision  is  increased  accordingly. The  major  parts 
of the carrying amount of provisions relate to closure/rehabilitation 
of tailings facilities, heap leach pads and waste dumps; demolition 
of  buildings/mine  facilities;  ongoing  water  treatment;  and  ongoing 
care and maintenance and security of closed mines. Costs included 
in  the  provision  encompass  all  closure  and  rehabilitation  activity 
expected  to  occur  progressively  over  the  life  of  the  operation  at  
the time of closure and post-closure in connection with disturbances 
as  at  the  reporting  date.  Estimated  costs  included  in  the 
determination of the provision reflect the risks and probabilities of 
alternative estimates of cash flows required to settle the obligation 
at each particular operation. The expected rehabilitation costs are 
estimated based on the cost of external contractors performing the 
work  or  the  cost  of  performing  the  work  internally  depending  on 
management’s intention.

The timing of the actual rehabilitation expenditure is dependent 
upon a number of factors such as the life and nature of the asset, 
the operating license conditions and the environment in which the 
mine  operates.  Expenditures  may  occur  before  and  after  closure 
and  can  continue  for  an  extended  period  of  time  depending  on 
rehabilitation requirements. Rehabilitation provisions are measured 
at  the  expected  value  of  future  cash  flows,  which  exclude  the 
effect of inflation, discounted to their present value using a current  

US dollar real risk-free pre-tax discount rate. The unwinding of the 
discount,  referred  to  as  accretion  expense,  is  included  in  finance 
costs  and  results  in  an  increase  in  the  amount  of  the  provision. 
Provisions  are  updated  each  reporting  period  for  changes  to 
expected  cash  flows  and  for  the  effect  of  changes  in  the  discount 
rate,  and  the  change  in  estimate  is  added  or  deducted  from  the 
related  asset  and  depreciated  over  the  expected  economic  life  of 
the operation to which it relates.

Significant  judgments  and  estimates  are  involved  in  forming 
expectations  of  future  activities,  the  amount  and  timing  of  the 
associated  cash  flows  and  the  period  over  which  we  estimate 
those cash flows. Those expectations are formed based on existing 
environmental and regulatory requirements or, if more stringent, our 
environmental policies which give rise to a constructive obligation. 
When  provisions  for  closure  and  rehabilitation  are  initially 
recognized,  the  corresponding  cost  is  capitalized  as  an  asset, 
representing  part  of  the  cost  of  acquiring  the  future  economic 
benefits  of  the  operation.  The  capitalized  cost  of  closure  and 
rehabilitation activities is recognized in PP&E and depreciated over 
the expected economic life of the operation to which it relates.

Adjustments to the estimated amount and timing of future closure 
and rehabilitation cash flows are a normal occurrence in light of the 
significant judgments and estimates involved. The principal factors 
that can cause expected cash flows to change are: the construction 
of  new  processing  facilities;  changes  in  the  quantities  of  material 
in reserves and resources with a corresponding change in the life 
of  mine  plan;  changing  ore  characteristics  that  impact  required 
environmental  protection  measures  and  related  costs;  changes  in 
water quality or volumes that impact the extent of water treatment 
required;  changes  in  discount  rates;  changes  in  foreign  exchange 
rates;  changes  in  Barrick’s  closure  policies;  and  changes  in  laws 
and regulations governing the protection of the environment.

Rehabilitation  provisions  are  adjusted  as  a  result  of  changes  
in  estimates  and  assumptions.  Those  adjustments  are  accounted 
for  as  a  change  in  the  corresponding  cost  of  the  related  assets, 
including the related mineral property, except where a reduction in 
the  provision  is  greater  than  the  remaining  net  book  value  of  the 
related  assets,  in  which  case  the  value  is  reduced  to  nil  and  the 
remaining adjustment is recognized in the consolidated statements 
of  income.  In  the  case  of  closed  sites,  changes  in  estimates  and 
assumptions  are  recognized  immediately  in  the  consolidated 
statements  of  income.  For  an  operating  mine,  the  adjusted 
carrying  amount  of  the  related  asset  is  depreciated  prospectively. 
Adjustments  also  result  in  changes  to  future  finance  costs. 
Provisions  are  discounted  to  their  present  value  using  a  current  
US  dollar  real  risk-free  pre-tax  discount  rate  and  the  accretion 
expense is included in finance costs.

r)  Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize the expense related to these plans over the vesting 
period, beginning once the grant has been approved and announced 
to the beneficiaries.

Cash-settled  awards  are  measured  at  fair  value  initially  using 
the market value of the underlying shares on the day preceding the 
date of the grant of the award and are required to be remeasured 
to  fair  value  at  each  reporting  date  until  settlement.  The  cost  is 
then recorded over the vesting period of the award. This expense, 
and any changes in the fair value of the award, is recorded to the 
same  expense  category  as  the  award  recipient’s  payroll  costs. 
The  cost  of  a  cash-settled  award  is  recorded  within  liabilities  until 
settled. Barrick offers cash-settled (Restricted Share Units (“RSU”), 
Deferred  Share  Units  (“DSU”)  and  Performance  Granted  Share 
Units (“PGSU”)) awards to certain employees, officers and directors 
of the Company.

We  use  the  accelerated  method  (also  referred  to  as  ‘graded’ 
vesting)  for  attributing  stock  option  expense  over  the  vesting 
period.  Stock  option  expense  incorporates  an  expected  forfeiture 
rate. The  expected  forfeiture  rate  is  estimated  based  on  historical 
forfeiture  rates  and  expectations  of  future  forfeiture  rates.  We  
make  adjustments  if  the  actual  forfeiture  rate  differs  from  the 
expected rate.

166

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsRestricted Share Units
Under  our  Long-Term  Incentive  Plan,  selected  employees  are 
granted  RSUs  where  each  RSU  has  a  value  equal  to  one  Barrick 
common share. RSUs generally vest within three years in cash and 
the after-tax value of the award may be used to purchase common 
shares  on  the  open  market,  depending  on  the  terms  of  the  grant. 
Additional  RSUs  are  credited  to  reflect  dividends  paid  on  Barrick 
common shares over the vesting period.

A liability for RSUs is measured at fair value on the grant date 
and is subsequently adjusted for changes in fair value. The liability 
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, with 
a corresponding charge to compensation expense, as a component 
of  general  and  administrative  expenses  and  cost  of  sales. 
Compensation  expenses  for  RSUs  incorporate  an  estimate  for 
expected forfeiture rates based on which the fair value is adjusted.

Deferred Share Units
Under our DSU plan, Directors must receive at least 63.6% of their 
basic  annual  retainer  in  the  form  of  DSUs  or  cash  to  purchase 
common  shares  that  cannot  be  sold,  transferred  or  otherwise 
disposed of until the Director leaves the Board. Each DSU has the 
same value as one Barrick common share. DSUs must be retained 
until  the  Director  leaves  the  Board,  at  which  time  the  cash  value 
of  the  DSUs  is  paid  out.  Additional  DSUs  are  credited  to  reflect 
dividends  paid  on  Barrick  common  shares.  The  initial  fair  value 
of the liability is calculated as of the grant date and is recognized 
immediately.  Subsequently,  at  each  reporting  date  and  on 
settlement, the liability is remeasured, with any change in fair value 
recorded as compensation expense in the period. Officers may also 
elect to receive a portion or all of their incentive compensation in the 
form of DSUs. We also allow granting of DSUs to other officers and 
employees at the discretion of the Board Compensation Committee.

Performance Granted Share Units
Under  our  PGSU  plan,  selected  employees  are  granted  PGSUs, 
where each PGSU has a value equal to one Barrick common share. 
Annual PGSU awards are determined based on a multiple ranging 
from three to six times base salary (depending on position and level 
of responsibility) multiplied by a performance factor. The number of 
PGSUs granted to a plan participant is determined by dividing the 
dollar  value  of  the  award  by  the  closing  price  of  Barrick  common 
shares  on  the  day  prior  to  the  grant,  or  if  the  grant  date  occurs 
during  a  blackout  period,  by  the  greater  of  (i)  the  closing  price  of 
Barrick common shares on the day prior to the grant date and (ii) the 
closing price of Barrick Common Shares on the first day following 
the expiration of the blackout. 

PGSUs vest within three years in cash, and the after-tax value 
of  the  award  is  used  to  purchase  common  shares  on  the  open 
market. Generally, these shares cannot be sold until the employee 
meets their share ownership requirement (in which case only those 
Barrick  Shares  in  excess  of  the  requirement  can  be  sold),  or  until 
they retire or leave the company.

The initial fair value of the liability is calculated as of the grant 
date  and  is  recognized  within  compensation  expense  using  the 
straight-line method over the vesting period. Subsequently, at each 
reporting  date  and  on  settlement,  the  liability  is  remeasured,  with 
any changes in fair value recorded as compensation expense.

s)   New Accounting Standards Adopted  

during the Year

Disclosure of Accounting Policies (Amendments to IAS 1 
Presentation of Financial Statements)
We  have  early  adopted 
‘Disclosure  of  Accounting  Policies 
(Amendments  to  IAS  1  Presentation  of  Financial  Statements)’ 
starting with these financial statements. The amendments to IAS 1  
provide  guidance  and  examples  to  help  entities  apply  materiality 
judgments  to  the  accounting  policy  disclosures  included  in  this  
note 2. 

t)   New Accounting Standards Issued But Not  

Yet Effective

Certain  new  accounting  standards  and  interpretations  have  been 
published  that  are  not  mandatory  for  the  current  period  and  have 
not been early adopted. These standards are not expected to have a 
material impact on Barrick in the current or future reporting periods.

3.   CRITICAL JUDGMENTS, ESTIMATES, 

ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS

Many  of  the  amounts  included  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheet 
require  management  to  make  judgments  and/or  estimates.  These 
judgments and estimates are continuously evaluated and are based 
on  management’s  experience  and  knowledge  of  the  relevant  facts 
and  circumstances.  Actual  results  may  differ  from  the  estimates. 
Information  about  such  judgments  and  estimates  is  contained  in 
the description of our accounting policies and/or other notes to the 
financial  statements.  The  key  areas  where  judgments,  estimates 
and assumptions have been made are summarized below.

Life of Mine (“LOM”) Plans and Reserves  
and Resources
Estimates of the quantities of proven and probable mineral reserves 
and mineral resources form the basis for our LOM plans, which are 
used for a number of important business and accounting purposes, 
including: the calculation of depreciation expense; the capitalization 
of  production  phase  stripping  costs; 
the  current/non-current 
classification  of  inventory;  the  recognition  of  deferred  revenue 
related  to  streaming  arrangements  and  forecasting  the  timing  of 
the payments related to the environmental rehabilitation provision. 
In  addition,  the  underlying  LOM  plans  are  used  in  the  impairment 
tests  for  goodwill  and  non-current  assets.  In  certain  cases,  these 
LOM plans have made assumptions about our ability to obtain the 
necessary permits required to complete the planned activities. We 
estimate our mineral reserves and resources based on information 
compiled  by  qualified  persons  as  defined  in  accordance  with  the 
Canadian  Securities  Administrators’  National  Instrument  43-101 
–  Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects  requirements.  To 
calculate  our  gold  reserves,  as  at  December  31,  2021,  we  have 
used a gold price assumption of $1,200 per ounce, consistent with 
the  prior  year.  To  calculate  our  measured,  indicated,  and  inferred 
gold  resources,  as  at  December  31,  2021,  we  have  used  a  gold 
price  assumption  of  $1,500  per  ounce,  consistent  with  the  prior 
year. Refer to notes 19 and 21.

Inventory
The  measurement  of  inventory  including  the  determination  of  its 
net  realizable  value,  especially  as  it  relates  to  ore  in  stockpiles, 
involves  the  use  of  estimates.  Net  realizable  value  is  determined 
with  reference  to  relevant  market  prices  less  applicable  variable 
selling  expenses.  Estimation  is  also  required  in  determining  the 
tonnage,  recoverable  gold  and  copper  contained  therein,  and  in 
determining  the  remaining  costs  of  completion  to  bring  inventory 
into its saleable form. Judgment also exists in determining whether 
to  recognize  a  provision  for  obsolescence  on  mine  operating 
supplies, and estimates are required to determine salvage or scrap 
value of supplies. 

Estimates  of  recoverable  gold  or  copper  on  the  leach  pads 
are calculated from the quantities of ore placed on the leach pads 
(measured tonnes added to the leach pads), the grade of ore placed 
on the leach pads (based on assay data) and a recovery percentage 
(based on ore type).

Impairment and Reversal of Impairment for  
Non-Current Assets and Impairment of Goodwill
Goodwill and non-current assets are tested for impairment if there is 
an indicator of impairment or reversal of impairment, and in the case 
of goodwill annually during the fourth quarter, for all of our operating 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 167

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementssegments.  We  consider  both  external  and  internal  sources  of 
information  for  indications  that  non-current  assets  and/or  goodwill 
are  impaired.  External  sources  of  information  we  consider  include 
changes in the market, economic, legal and permitting environment 
in which the CGU operates that are not within its control and affect 
the  recoverable  amount  of  mining  interests  and  goodwill.  Internal 
sources  of  information  we  consider  include  the  manner  in  which 
mining  properties  and  plant  and  equipment  are  being  used  or  are 
expected  to  be  used  and  indications  of  economic  performance  of 
the  assets.  Calculating  the  FVLCD  of  CGUs  for  non-current  asset 
and  goodwill  impairment  tests  requires  management  to  make 
estimates and assumptions with respect to future production levels, 
operating, capital and closure costs in our LOM plans, future metal 
prices, foreign exchange rates, Net Asset Value (“NAV”) multiples, 
fair  value  of  mineral  resources  outside  LOM  plans  in  relation  to 
the  assumptions  related  to  comparable  entities  and  the  market 
values  per  ounce  and  per  pound  and  weighted  average  costs  of 
capital.  Changes  in  any  of  the  assumptions  or  estimates  used  in 
determining  the  fair  values  could  impact  the  impairment  analysis. 
Refer to notes 2m, 2o and 21 for further information. 

Provisions for Environmental Rehabilitation 
Management assesses its provision for environmental rehabilitation 
on  an  annual  basis  or  when  new  information  becomes  available. 
This assessment includes the estimation of the future rehabilitation 
costs (including water treatment), the timing of these expenditures, 
and the impact of changes in discount rates and foreign exchange 
rates. The actual future expenditures may differ from the amounts 
the  estimates  made  are  significantly 
currently  provided 
different  than  actual  results  or  if  there  are  significant  changes  in 
environmental  and/or  regulatory  requirements  in  the  future.  Refer 
to notes 2q and 27 for further information.

if 

is  required 

the  development  of  natural  resources  by 

Taxes
Management 
to  assess  uncertainties  and  make 
judgments  and  estimations  regarding  the  tax  basis  of  assets  and 
liabilities  and  related  deferred  income  tax  assets  and  liabilities, 
amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions, the measurement of 
income tax expense and indirect taxes such as royalties and export 
duties,  and  estimates  of  the  timing  of  repatriation  of  earnings, 
which would impact the recognition of withholding taxes and taxes 
related to the outside basis on subsidiaries/associates. While these 
amounts represent management’s best estimate based on the laws 
and  regulations  that  exist  at  the  time  of  preparation,  we  operate 
in  certain  jurisdictions  that  have  increased  degrees  of  political 
and  sovereign  risk  and  while  host  governments  have  historically 
supported 
foreign 
companies,  tax  legislation  in  these  jurisdictions  is  developing  and 
there  is  a  risk  that  fiscal  reform  changes  with  respect  to  existing 
investments  could  unexpectedly  impact  application  of  this  tax 
legislation.  Such  changes  could  impact  the  Company’s  judgments 
about the amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions, tax basis of 
assets  and  liabilities,  and  related  deferred  income  tax  assets  and 
liabilities,  and  estimates  of  the  timing  of  repatriation  of  earnings. 
This  could  necessitate  future  adjustments  to  tax  income  and 
expense  already  recorded.  A  number  of  these  estimates  require 
management  to  make  estimates  of  future  taxable  profit,  as  well 
as  the  recoverability  of  indirect  taxes,  and  if  actual  results  are 
significantly  different  than  our  estimates,  the  ability  to  realize  the 
deferred  tax  assets  and  indirect  tax  receivables  recorded  on  our 
balance sheet could be impacted. Refer to notes 2h, 12, 30 and 35 
for further information. 

Contingencies
Contingencies  can  be  either  possible  assets  or  possible  liabilities 
arising from past events which, by their nature, will only be resolved 
when one or more future events not wholly within our control occur 
or  fail  to  occur.  The  assessment  of  such  contingencies  inherently 
involves  the  exercise  of  significant  judgment  and  estimates  of  the 

168

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

outcome of future events. In assessing loss contingencies related to 
legal proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted claims 
that  may  result  in  such  proceedings  or  regulatory  or  government 
actions  that  may  negatively  impact  our  business  or  operations, 
the  Company  with  assistance  from  its  legal  counsel  evaluates  the 
perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims or 
actions  as  well  as  the  perceived  merits  of  the  nature  and  amount 
of  relief  sought  or  expected  to  be  sought,  when  determining  the 
amount,  if  any,  to  recognize  as  a  contingent  liability  or  assessing 
the impact on the carrying value of assets. If the assessment of a 
contingency suggests that a loss is probable, and the amount can 
be  reliably  estimated,  then  a  loss  is  recorded.  When  a  contingent 
loss is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but 
the  amount  of  loss  cannot  be  reliably  estimated,  then  details  of 
the  contingent  loss  are  disclosed.  Loss  contingencies  considered 
remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, 
in which case we disclose the nature of the guarantee. Contingent 
assets are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. 
Refer to note 35 for more information.

Pascua-Lama Value Added Tax
The  Pascua-Lama  project  received  $411  million  as  at  December 
31, 2021 ($459 million as at December 31, 2020) in value added tax 
(“VAT”) refunds in Chile relating to the development of the Chilean 
side of the project. Under the current arrangement this amount must 
be repaid if the project does not evidence exports for an amount of 
$3,538  million  within  a  term  that  expires  on  December  31,  2026, 
unless extended. 

In  addition,  we  have  recorded  $48  million  in  VAT  recoverable 
in Argentina as at December 31, 2021 ($53 million as at December 
31, 2020) relating to the development of the Argentinean side of the 
project. These amounts may not be fully recoverable if the project 
does not enter into production and are subject to foreign currency 
risk as the amounts are recoverable in Argentine pesos.

Streaming Transactions
The upfront cash deposit received from Royal Gold on the gold and 
silver streaming transaction for production linked to Barrick’s 60% 
interest in the Pueblo Viejo mine has been accounted for as deferred 
revenue  since  we  have  determined  that  it  is  not  a  derivative  as  it 
will be satisfied through the delivery of non-financial items (i.e., gold 
and  silver)  rather  than  cash  or  financial  assets.  It  is  our  intention 
to settle the obligations under the streaming arrangement through 
our  own  production  and  if  we  were  to  fail  to  settle  the  obligations 
with Royal Gold through our own production, this would lead to the 
streaming arrangement becoming a derivative. This would cause a 
change to the accounting treatment, resulting in the revaluation of 
the fair value of the agreement through profit and loss on a recurring 
basis. Refer to note 29 for further details.

The deferred revenue component of our streaming agreements 
is considered variable and is subject to retroactive adjustment when 
there  is  a  change  in  the  timing  of  the  delivery  of  ounces  or  in  the 
underlying  production  profile  of  the  relevant  mine.  The  impact  of 
such  a  change  in  the  timing  or  quantity  of  ounces  to  be  delivered 
under a streaming agreement will result in retroactive adjustments 
to both the deferred revenue recognized and the accretion recorded 
prior to the date of the change. Refer to note 2e. For further details 
on streaming transactions, including our silver sale agreement with 
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (“Wheaton”), refer to note 29.

Covid-19
On  March  11,  2020,  the  Covid-19  outbreak  was  declared  a 
pandemic  by  the  World  Health  Organization.  The  pandemic  and 
efforts  to  contain  it  have  had  a  significant  effect  on  commodity 
prices and capital markets. We continue to enforce certain operating 
procedures  to  respond  to  Covid-19,  and  to  date,  our  operations 
have  not  been  significantly  impacted  by  the  pandemic  with  the 
exception  of  Veladero,  where  the  commissioning  of  the  Phase  6 
leach  pad  was  delayed  to  the  second  quarter  of  2021  following 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsmovement restrictions implemented by the government of Argentina 
during  the  construction  phase.  Hemlo  also  experienced  a  slower 
ramp-up  of  underground  development  in  2021  due  to  Covid-19 
movement restrictions which impacted production. Notwithstanding 
the  proactive  and  considered  actions  taken  to  maintain  a  safe 
workplace,  it  is  possible  that  in  the  future  there  will  be  negative 
impacts  on  our  operations  or  supply  chain  and  the  pandemic 
and  associated  disruptions  may  trigger  actions  such  as  reduced 
mining and production activities at our operations. This could have 
a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  cash  flows,  earnings,  results  of 
operations and financial position.

Our sites have continued to produce and sell their production, 
with  no  significant  disruptions  to  date  other  than  Veladero  and 
Hemlo,  as  noted  above.  Our  ability  to  maintain  production  across 
our  operations  combined  with  increased  market  gold  prices,  has 
resulted in Barrick being able to deliver $4.4 billion in operating cash 
flow for the year ended December 31, 2021. Barrick has $5.3 billion 
in  cash,  an  undrawn  $3.0  billion  credit  facility  and  no  significant 
debt repayments due until 2033, providing us with sufficient liquidity 
to manage through this period of uncertainty.

Other Notes to the Financial Statements

Note Page

Acquisitions and Divestitures
Segment Information
Revenue
Cost of Sales
Exploration, Evaluation and Project Expenses
Other Expense (Income)
Impairment (Reversals) Charges 
General and Administrative Expenses

Income Tax Expense
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Finance Costs, Net
Cash Flow – Other Items
Investments
Inventories
Accounts Receivable and Other Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment
Goodwill and other Intangible Assets
Impairment and Reversal of Non-Current Assets
Other Assets
Accounts Payable
Other current Liabilities
Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurements
Provisions
Financial Risk Management
Other Non-Current Liabilities
Deferred Income Taxes
Capital Stock
Non-Controlling Interests
Related Party Transactions
Stock-Based Compensation
Contingencies

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35 

169
170
173
174
174
175
175
175

175
176
177
177
178
179
180
180
182
182
185
185
185
185
189
190
190
192
193
195
195
196
196
197

4.  ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
a)  Lagunas Norte
On  February  16,  2021,  Barrick  announced  it  had  entered  into  an 
agreement to sell its 100% interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine 
in  Peru  to  Boroo  Pte  Ltd.  (“Boroo”)  for  total  consideration  of  up 
to  $81  million,  with  $20  million  of  cash  consideration  on  closing, 
additional  cash  consideration  of  $10  million  payable  on  the  first 
anniversary  of  closing  and  $20  million  payable  on  the  second 
anniversary  of  closing,  a  2%  net  smelter  return  royalty,  which 
may  be  purchased  by  Boroo  for  a  fixed  period  after  closing  for  
$16  million,  plus  a  contingent  payment  of  up  to  $15  million  
based on the two-year average gold price. An impairment reversal 
of $86 million was recognized in the first quarter of 2021. Refer to 
note 21 for further details. The transaction closed on June 1, 2021 
and we recognized a gain on sale of $4 million in the second quarter 
of 2021 based on a final fair value of consideration of $65 million. 
We remain contractually liable for all tax matters that existed prior 
to our divestiture until these matters are resolved. In addition, Boroo 
assumed 50% of the $173 million reclamation bond obligations for 
Lagunas Norte upon closing and will assume the other 50% within 
one year of closing.

b)   Acquisition of South Arturo  
Non-Controlling Interest

On September 7, 2021, Barrick announced NGM had entered into a 
definitive  asset  exchange  agreement  (the  “Exchange Agreement”) 
with  i-80  Gold  Corp.  (“i-80  Gold”)  to  acquire  the  40%  interest  in 
South  Arturo  that  NGM  did  not  already  own,  in  exchange  for  the 
Lone  Tree  and  Buffalo  Mountain  properties  and  infrastructure, 
which  were  in  care  and  maintenance  at  the  time.  The  exchange 
transaction closed on October 14, 2021. 

The  Exchange  Agreement  provides  for  payment  to  NGM  of 
contingent  consideration  of  up  to  $50  million  based  on  mineral 
resources  from  the  Lone  Tree  property.  In  connection  with  the 
asset  exchange,  NGM  also  entered  into  toll-milling  agreements 
providing  i-80  Gold  with  interim  processing  capacity  at  NGM’s 
autoclave facilities until the earlier of the three-year anniversary of 
the asset exchange and the date on which the Lone Tree facility is 
operational, and separately at NGM’s roaster facilities for a 10-year 
period,  which  was  assigned  a  fair  value  of  $nil.  In  addition,  each 
party  assumed  the  environmental  liabilities  and  closure  bonding 
for their acquired properties. In conjunction with the closing of the 
transaction on October 14, 2021, NGM subscribed for $48 million in 
common shares of i-80 Gold.

We assigned a fair value of $175 million to the transaction and 
recognized  a  gain  of  $205  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  in 
relation  to  the  disposition  of  Lone  Tree.  Lone  Tree  was  in  a  net 
liability  position,  which  resulted  in  a  gain  that  exceeded  the  fair 
value. In addition, we recognized a loss of $85 million in equity in 
the fourth quarter, representing our share of the difference between 
the carrying value of the South Arturo non-controlling interest and 
the fair value of the transaction.

c)  Massawa Project
On  March  4,  2020,  Barrick  and  our  Senegalese  joint  venture 
partner  completed  the  sale  of  our  aggregate  90%  interest  in 
the  Massawa  project  (“Massawa”)  in  Senegal  to  Teranga  Gold 
Corporation  (“Teranga”),  now  Endeavour  Mining  Corporation,  for 
total consideration fair valued at $440 million on the date of closing. 
Barrick  received  92.5%  of  the  consideration  for  its  interest  in  the 
Massawa  project,  with  the  balance  received  by  Barrick’s  local 
Senegalese partner. Barrick received a net of $256 million in cash 
and 19,164,403 Teranga common shares (worth $104 million at the 
date of closing) plus a contingent payment of up to $46.25 million 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 169

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsf)  Morila
On  November  10,  2020,  Barrick  and  AngloGold  Ashanti  Limited 
completed the sale of our combined 80% interest in the Morila gold 
mine  in  Mali  to  Firefinch  Limited  (previously  Mali  Lithium  Limited) 
for $28.8 million cash consideration. The State of Mali continues to 
hold the remaining 20% of the Morila gold mine. The consideration 
received was allocated against the interests that AngloGold Ashanti 
and  Barrick  held  in  Morila,  as  well  as  intercompany  loans  that 
Barrick  held  against  Morila,  and  the  transaction  resulted  in  a  gain 
for Barrick of $27 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

reviews 

the  operating 

5.  SEGMENT INFORMATION
Barrick’s  business  is  organized  into  eighteen  minesites  and 
one  project.  Barrick’s  CODM  (Mark  Bristow,  President  and  Chief 
results,  assesses 
Executive  Officer) 
performance  and  makes  capital  allocation  decisions  at 
the 
minesite,  Company  and/or  project  level.  Each  individual  minesite 
and the Pascua-Lama project are operating segments for financial 
reporting  purposes.  Our  presentation  of  our  reportable  operating 
segments  consists  of  nine  gold  mines  (Carlin,  Cortez,  Turquoise 
Ridge, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Kibali, Veladero, North Mara 
and  Bulyanhulu).  Starting  in  the  first  quarter  of  2021,  Goldrush 
was  included  as  part  of  Cortez  as  the  CODM  began  reviewing 
the  operating  results  and  assessing  performance  on  a  combined 
level. The  remaining  operating  segments,  including  our  remaining 
gold mines, copper mines and project, have been grouped into an 
“other”  category  and  will  not  be  reported  on  individually.  Segment 
performance is evaluated based on a number of measures including 
operating income before tax, production levels and unit production 
costs. Certain costs are managed on a consolidated basis and are 
therefore  not  reflected  in  segment  income.  Prior  period  figures 
have  been  restated  to  reflect  the  changes  made  to  our  reportable 
operating segments in the current year.

based  on  the  three-year  average  gold  price,  which  was  valued  at 
$28 million at the date of closing. The cash consideration received 
was net of $25 million that Barrick provided through its participation 
in  the  $225  million  syndicated  debt  financing  facility  secured  by 
Teranga  in  connection  with  the  transaction.  In  the  first  quarter  of 
2021,  we  received  full  repayment  of  the  outstanding  loan.  The 
difference between the fair value of consideration received and the 
carrying  value  of  the  assets  on  closing  was  $54  million  and  was 
recognized as a gain in the first quarter of 2020. 

d)  Eskay Creek
On  August  4,  2020  Barrick  entered  into  a  definitive  agreement  
with  Skeena  Resources  Limited  (“Skeena”)  pursuant  to  which 
Skeena exercised its option to acquire the Eskay Creek project in 
British Columbia and Barrick waived its back-in right on the Eskay 
Creek  project.  The  consideration  under  the  definitive  agreement 
consisted  of:  (i)  the  issuance  by  Skeena  of  22,500,000  units  (the 
“Units”),  with  each  Unit  comprising  one  common  share  of  Skeena 
and one half of a warrant, with each whole warrant entitling Barrick 
to purchase one additional common share of Skeena at an exercise 
price  of  C$2.70  each  until  the  second  anniversary  of  the  closing 
date; (ii) the grant of a 1% NSR royalty on the entire Eskay Creek 
land package; and (iii) a contingent payment of C$15 million payable 
during  a  24-month  period  after  closing. The  transaction  closed  on 
October  5,  2020  and  we  recognized  a  gain  of  $59  million  for  the 
year ended December 31, 2020.

e)  Bullfrog
On  October  13,  2020,  wholly-owned  subsidiaries  of  Barrick  and 
Bullfrog Gold Corp. (“Bullfrog”) entered into a definitive agreement 
pursuant to which Barrick agreed to sell to Bullfrog all of Barrick’s 
mining  claims,  historical  resources,  permits,  rights  of  way  and  
water  rights  in  the  Bullfrog  mine  area  (the  “Barrick  Lands”). 
Consideration  for  the  transaction  consisted  of  (i)  the  issuance  by 
Bullfrog of 54,600,000 units, with each unit comprising one common 
share  of  Bullfrog  and  one  warrant  entitling  Barrick  to  purchase  
one  additional  common  share  of  Bullfrog  at  an  exercise  price  of 
C$0.30  each  until  the  fourth  anniversary  of  the  closing  date,  and  
(ii)  a  2%  NSR  royalty  on  all  minerals  produced  from  the  Barrick 
Lands,  subject  to  a  maximum  aggregate  NSR  royalty  of  5.5%  on 
any  individual  mining  claim  and  a  minimum  0.5%  NSR  royalty 
granted to Barrick on any individual mining claim. The transaction 
closed on October 26, 2020 and we recognized a gain of $22 million 
for the year ended December 31, 2020. 

170

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME INFORMATION

For the year ended December 31, 2021
Carlin2 
Cortez2
Turquoise Ridge2
Pueblo Viejo2
Loulo-Gounkoto2
Kibali

Veladero
North Mara2
Bulyanhulu2
Other Mines2
Reportable segment total

Share of equity investee

Segment total

Cost of Sales

Site operating 
costs, 
royalties and 
community 

Revenue

relations Depreciation

Exploration, 
evaluation 
and project 
expenses

$  2,687  

$  1,175  

$ 

276  

$ 

1,485

987

1,514

1,249

661

382

552

361

633

415

505

454

232

177

240

155

2,659

$ 12,537  
(661)

$ 11,876  

1,179

$  5,165  
(232)

$  4,933  

294

200

234

278

141

85

56

57

580

$  2,201  
(141)

$  2,060  

$ 

$ 

22  

10

1

5

18

5

1

–

–

10

72  
(5)

67  

Other 
expenses
 (income)1

Segment 
income  
(loss)

$ 

25  

$  1,189

1

–

11

25

5

1

2

2

81

153  
(5)

148  

$ 

$ 

547

371

759

474

278

118

254

147

809

$  4,946
(278)

$  4,668

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME INFORMATION

For the year ended December 31, 2020
Carlin2
Cortez2
Turquoise Ridge2
Pueblo Viejo2
Loulo-Gounkoto2
Kibali

Veladero
North Mara2
Bulyanhulu2
Other Mines2
Reportable segment total

Share of equity investee
Segment total

Cost of Sales

Site operating 
costs, 
royalties and 
community 

Revenue

relations Depreciation

Exploration, 
evaluation 
and project 
expenses

$  2,952  

$  1,318  

$ 

306  

$ 

30  

Other 
expenses
 (income)1
1  

$ 

Segment 
income  
(loss)

$  1,297

1,409

960

1,613

1,208

648

333

571

240

543

391

511

452

223

144

227

112

3,124

$ 13,058  

(648)
$ 12,410  

1,414

$  5,335  

(223)
$  5,112  

222

184

224

267

174

69

91

72

715

$  2,324  

(174)
$  2,150  

$ 

$ 

12

7

11

11

2

–

–

–

14

87  

(2)
85  

4

3

(6)

29

5

6

(1)

25

55

628

375

873

449

244

114

254

31

926

$ 

$ 

121  

(5)
116  

$  5,191

(244)
$  4,947

1   Includes accretion expense, which is included with finance costs in the consolidated statements of income. For the year ended December 31, 2021, accretion 

expense was $26 million (2020: $22 million). 

2   Includes  non-controlling  interest  portion  of  revenues,  cost  of  sales  and  segment  income  (loss)  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  for  Pueblo  Viejo,  
$617  million,  $294  million,  $318  million  (2020:  $660  million,  $293  million,  $365  million),  Nevada  Gold  Mines,  $2,362  million,  $1,359  million,  $991  million  
(2020:  $2,432  million,  $1,369  million,  $1,036  million),  North  Mara,  Bulyanhulu  and  Buzwagi,  $159  million,  $92  million,  $63  million  (2020:  $194  million,  
$114 million, $76 million), Loulo-Gounkoto, $250 million, $146 million, $95 million (2020: $242 million, $144 million, $90 million) and Tongon, $38 million,  
$32 million, $5 million (2020: $52 million, $39 million, $14 million). 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 171

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RECONCILIATION OF SEGMENT INCOME TO INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

For the years ended December 31

Segment income

Other revenue

Other cost of sales/amortization

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses not attributable to segments

General and administrative expenses

Other income not attributable to segments

Impairment reversals

Loss on currency translation

Closed mine rehabilitation

Income from equity investees
Finance costs, net (includes non-segment accretion)1
Gain on non-hedge derivatives

Income before income taxes

1  Includes debt extinguishment losses of $nil (2020: $15 million losses).

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

2021

2020

$  4,668  

$  4,947

109

(96)

(220)

(151)

187

63

(29)

(18)

446

(329)

2

185

(155)

(210)

(185)

262

269

(50)

(90)

288

(325)

10

$  4,632  

$  4,946

United States

Mali

Dominican Republic

Democratic Republic of Congo

Chile

Zambia

Tanzania

Argentina

Canada

Saudi Arabia

Papua New Guinea

Côte d'Ivoire

Peru

Unallocated

Total

Non-current assets

Revenue

As at
Dec. 31, 
2021

As at
Dec. 31,
2020

2021

2020

$ 16,355  

$ 16,233  

$  6,134  

$  6,298

4,709

4,602

3,267

1,937

1,793

1,767

1,739

517

382

330

191

113

939

4,659

4,219

3,278

2,027

1,720

1,703

1,686

479

369

347

266

186

1,253

1,249

1,514

–

–

962

993

382

291

–

–

369

91

–

1,208

1,613

–

–

697

1,214

333

407

–

140

508

177

–

$ 38,641  

$ 38,425  

$ 11,985  

$ 12,595

172

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES INFORMATION 

As at December 31

Carlin

Cortez

Turquoise Ridge

Pueblo Viejo

Loulo-Gounkoto

Kibali

Veladero

North Mara

Bulyanhulu

Other Mines

Reportable segment total

Other items not allocated to segments

Total
Share of equity investee
Total

 Segment Capital 
Expenditures1
2021

2020

$ 

422  
277

$ 

144

533

313

70

144

93

80

351

395

399

97

228

243

53

104

89

79

345

$  2,427  

$  2,032

129

$  2,556  
(70)
$  2,486  

89

$  2,121
(53)
$  2,068

1   Segment  capital  expenditures  are  presented  for  internal  management  reporting  purposes  on  an  accrual  basis.  Capital  expenditures  in  the  consolidated 
statements of cash flow are presented on a cash basis. In 2021, cash expenditures were $2,435 million (2020: $2,054 million) and the increase in accrued 
expenditures was $51 million (2020: $14 million increase).

6.  REVENUE

For the years ended December 31
Gold sales1
Spot market sales

Concentrate sales

Provisional pricing adjustments

Copper sales1
Copper concentrate sales

Provisional pricing adjustments

Other sales2
Total

2021

2020

$ 10,491  

$ 11,129

246

1

520

21

$ 10,738  

$ 11,670

$ 

915  
47
962  
285  
$ 
$ 11,985  

$ 

$ 

644

53

697

228

$ 

$ 

$ 12,595

1   Revenues include amounts transferred from OCI to earnings for commodity 

cash flow hedges. 

2  Revenues from the sale of by-products from our gold and copper mines.

For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  the  Company  has  three 
customers  that  individually  account  for  more  than  10%  of  the 
Company’s total revenue. These customers represent approximately 
24%,  13%  and  10%  of  total  revenue.  However,  because  gold  can 
be sold through numerous gold market traders worldwide (including 
a  large  number  of  financial  institutions),  the  Company  is  not 
economically dependent on a limited number of customers for the 
sale of its product.

Principal Products
All of our gold mining operations produce gold in doré form, except 
Phoenix,  Bulyanhulu  and  Porgera  (until  it  was  placed  on  care 
and  maintenance  in  April  2020),  which  produce  both  gold  doré 
and  gold  concentrate.  Gold  doré  is  unrefined  gold  bullion  bars 
usually  consisting  of  90%  gold  that  is  refined  to  pure  gold  bullion 
prior  to  sale  to  our  customers.  Concentrate  is  a  semi-processed 
product  containing  the  valuable  metal  minerals  from  which  most 
of  the  waste  mineral  has  been  eliminated.  Our  Lumwana  mine 
produces a concentrate that primarily contains copper. Our Phoenix 
mine  produces  a  concentrate  that  contains  both  gold  and  copper. 
Incidental revenues from the sale of by-products, primarily copper, 
silver and energy at our gold mines, are classified within other sales.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 173

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provisional Copper and Gold Sales
We  have  provisionally  priced  sales  for  which  price  finalization, 
referenced  to  the  relevant  copper  and  gold  index,  is  outstanding 
at  the  balance  sheet  date.  Our  exposure  at  December  31,  2021 
to the impact of future movements in market commodity prices for 
provisionally priced sales is set out in the following table:

At December 31, 2021, our provisionally priced copper sales subject 
to  final  settlement  were  recorded  at  an  average  price  of  $4.34/lb 
(2020:  $3.17/lb).  At  December  31,  2021,  our  provisionally  priced 
gold sales subject to final settlement were recorded at an average 
price of $1,819/oz (2020: $1,899/oz). The sensitivities in the above 
tables  have  been  determined  as  the  impact  of  a  10%  change  in 
commodity  prices  at  each  reporting  date,  while  holding  all  other 
variables, including foreign currency exchange rates, constant.

Volumes subject to 
final pricing
 Copper (millions)
 Gold (000s)

2021

2020

45

41

49

22

Impact on net 
income before 
taxation of 10% 
movement in  
market price

2021

$  20  
8

2020

$  16

4

As at December 31

Copper pounds

Gold ounces

7.  COST OF SALES

For the years ended December 31
Site operating cost1,2,3
Depreciation1
Royalty expense

Community relations

Gold

Copper

Other4

Total

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

$  4,218  
1,889

$  4,421  
1,975

$ 

371

26

410

26

266  
197

103

3
569  

$ 

$ 

292  
208

54

2
556  

$ 

–  

$ 

16

–

–
16  

$ 

$ 

3  

25

–

1
29  

$  4,484  
2,102

$  4,716
2,208

474

29

464

29

$  7,089  

$  7,417

Total

$  6,504  

$  6,832  

$ 

1   Site operating costs and depreciation include charges to reduce the cost of inventory to net realizable value of $22 million (2020: $29 million). Refer to note 17.
2  Site operating costs includes the costs of extracting by-products.
3  Includes employee costs of $1,396 million (2020: $1,520 million).
4  Other includes corporate amortization.

8.   EXPLORATION, EVALUATION  
AND PROJECT EXPENSES

For the years ended December 31
Global exploration and evaluation1
Project costs:

  Pascua-Lama

  Other

Corporate development
Minesite exploration and evaluation1
Total exploration, evaluation  
and project expenses

2021

2020

$ 

122  

$ 

143

46

39

16

64

37

27

9

79

$ 

287  

$ 

295

1  Approximates the impact on operating cash flow.

174

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
9.  OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)

11.  GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

For the years ended December 31

2021

2020

For the years ended December 31

Corporate administration

$ 

$ 

17  
12

19

(1)

Share-based compensation
Total1

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

118  
33
151  

$ 

118

67

$ 

185

Other Expense:

  Litigation costs

  Write-offs (reversals)

 Bulyanhulu reduced operations  
  program costs1

  Bank charges

  Porgera care and maintenance costs

  Covid-19 donations

  Buzwagi supplies obsolescence

  Litigation settlements

  Other

Total other expense

Other Income:
  Gain on sale of long-lived assets2
  Remeasurement of silver sale liability3
  Peru tax disputes settlement

 Loss (gain) on warrant investments  
  at FVPL

  Gain on non-hedge derivatives

Interest income on other assets

  Other

Total other income

Total

–

7

51

–

21

25

17
150  

(213) 
–
–

16

(2)

(15)

(3)
(217) 
(67) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

22

16

51

24

–

–

20

$ 

151

(104)

7

(9)

(10)

(21)

(12)

$ 

$ 

(329)

(178)

1  Primarily relates to care and maintenance costs.
2   2021  includes  a  gain  of  $205  million  from  the  disposal  of  Lone  Tree.  
2020 includes a gain of $59 million from the sale of Eskay Creek, a gain of 
$54 million from the sale of Massawa, a gain of $27 million from the sale of 
Morila, and a gain of $22 million from the sale of Bullfrog. Refer to note 4  
for further details. 

3  Refer to note 29 for further details. 

$ 

(180)

Deferred tax

1 Includes employee costs of $101 million (2020: $128 million).

12.  INCOME TAX EXPENSE

For the years ended December 31

2021

2020

Tax on profit

Current tax

  Charge for the year
  Adjustment in respect of prior years1

 Origination and reversal of temporary   
  differences in the current year
  Adjustment in respect of prior years1

Income tax expense
Tax expense related to  
  continuing operations

Current

  Canada

International

Deferred

  Canada

International

$  1,031  
(32)
999  

$ 

$  1,122

59

$  1,181

$ 

289  
56
345  
$ 
$  1,344  

$ 

263

(112)

$ 

151

$  1,332

$ 

(9) 

$ 

14

1,008

1,167

$ 

999  

$  1,181

$ 

38  

$ 

(6)

307
345  
$ 
$  1,344  

157

151

$ 

$  1,332

10.  IMPAIRMENT (REVERSALS) CHARGES

Income tax expense

For the years ended December 31
Impairment reversals of long-lived assets1  
Impairment of intangibles1
Total

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

(63) 
–
(63) 

$ 

(281)

12

$ 

(269)

1  Refer to note 21 for further details.

1   Includes  adjustments  to  equalize  the  difference  between  prior  year’s 
tax  return  and  the  year-end  provision. The  2020  amount  also  includes  a 
current tax expense and a deferred tax recovery from the resolution of all 
outstanding disputes between Barrick and the GoT. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 175

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RECONCILIATION TO CANADIAN STATUTORY RATE

For the years ended December 31

At 26.5% statutory rate

2021

2020

$  1,228  

$  1,311

Increase (decrease) due to:
Allowances and special tax deductions1
Impact of foreign tax rates2
Expenses not tax deductible

Taxable gains on sales of long-lived assets
Net currency translation (gains) losses  
  on current and deferred tax balances
Tax impact from pass-through entities  
  and equity accounted investments

Current year tax gains not recognized
Recognition and de-recognition of  
  deferred tax assets

Adjustments in respect of prior years
Increase to income tax related  
  contingent liabilities

Impact of tax rate changes

Withholding taxes

Mining taxes
Tax impact of amounts recognized  
  within accumulated OCI

Other items

Income tax expense

(138)

(84)

118

24

23

(330)

(18)

(31)

24

19

66

110

323

8

2

(151)

(32)

154

–

(19)

(309)

(9)

(61)

(53)

42

1

100

383

(21)

(4)

$  1,344  

$  1,332

1   We  are  able  to  claim  certain  allowances,  incentives  and  tax  deductions 

unique to extractive industries that result in a lower effective tax rate.

2   We operate in multiple foreign tax jurisdictions that have tax rates different 

than the Canadian statutory rate.

Currency Translation
Current and deferred tax balances are subject to remeasurement for 
changes in currency exchange rates each period. This is required in 
countries where tax is paid in local currency and the subsidiary has 
a different functional currency (e.g. US dollars). The most significant 
balances relate to Argentine and Malian tax liabilities.

In  2021,  a  tax  expense  of  $23  million  arose  from  translation 
losses on tax balances, mainly due to the weakening of the Argentine 
peso and the West African CFA franc against the US dollar. In 2020, 
a tax recovery of $19 million arose from translation losses and gains 
on  tax  balances  due  to  the  weakening  of  the Argentine  peso  and 
strengthening  of  the  West African  CFA  franc,  respectively,  against 
the  US  dollar.  These  net  translation  losses  (gains)  are  included 
within income tax expense (recovery).

Nevada Mining Education Tax
A new mining excise tax applied to gross proceeds became effective 
on  July  1,  2021  following  the  passing  of Assembly  Bill  495  at  the 
Nevada Legislative Session ended on May 31, 2021. The revenue 
generated by this new excise tax will be directed towards education. 
The new excise tax is a tiered tax, with the highest rate at 1.1% and 
first payment expected in April 2022. 

The  bill  does  not  take  into  consideration  expenses  or  costs 
incurred  to  generate  gross  proceeds;  therefore,  this  tax  is  treated 
as a gross receipts tax and not as a tax based on income subject to 
IAS 12. As a result, this new tax is reported as a component of cost 
of sales and not as an income tax expense.

Argentina Deferred Taxes
On June 16, 2021, Argentina enacted a law increasing its corporate 
tax  rate  from  30%  to  35%  for  2021  and  thereafter.  This  law 
supersedes  previous  legislation  that  was  expected  to  enforce  a 
corporate tax rate of 25% for 2021 and thereafter. In addition, the 
dividend withholding tax was decreased from 13% to 7% for 2021 
and thereafter.

A  deferred  tax  expense  of  $72  million  was  recorded  in  the 

second quarter of 2021 as a result of the tax reform measures.

Withholding Taxes
In  2021,  we  have  recorded  $66  million  of  dividend  withholding 
taxes  related  to  the  undistributed  earnings  of  our  subsidiaries  in 
Argentina,  Côte  d’Ivoire,  Saudi Arabia  and  the  United  States.  We 
have  also  recorded  $33  million  (2020:  $87  million  related  to  Côte 
d’Ivoire,  Tanzania  and  the  United  States)  of  dividend  withholding 
taxes  related  to  the  distributed  earnings  of  our  subsidiaries  in 
Argentina, Saudi Arabia and the United States.

Nevada Gold Mines
Nevada Gold Mines is a limited liability company treated as a flow 
through  partnership  for  US  tax  purposes.  The  partnership  is  not 
subject  to  federal  income  tax  directly,  but  each  of  its  partners  is 
liable for tax on its share of the profits of the partnership. As such, 
Barrick accounts for its current and deferred income tax associated 
with the investment (61.5% share) following the principles in IAS 12. 

Mining Taxes
In addition to corporate income tax, we pay mining taxes in the United 
States  (Nevada),  the  Dominican  Republic,  Canada  (Ontario)  and 
Peru. Nevada Gold Mines is subject to a Net Proceeds of Minerals 
tax in Nevada at a rate of 5% and the tax expense recorded in 2021 
was $136 million (2020: $149 million). Other significant mining taxes 
include the Dominican Republic’s Net Profits Interest tax, which is 
determined  based  on  cash  flows  as  defined  by  the  Pueblo  Viejo 
Special  Lease  Agreement.  A  tax  expense  of  $180  million  (2020: 
$212 million) was recorded for this in 2021. Both taxes are included 
on a consolidated basis in the Company’s consolidated statements 
of income.

13.  EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

For the years ended December 31  
($ millions, except shares in millions and per share amounts in dollars)

Net income

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

Net income attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation

Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic and diluted earnings per share data attributable to the  
  equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation

2021

2020

Basic

$  3,288

(1,266)

$  2,022
1,779

Diluted

$  3,288

(1,266)

$  2,022
1,779

Basic

$  3,614

(1,290)

$  2,324

1,778

Diluted

$  3,614

(1,290)

$  2,324

1,778

$  1.14

$  1.14

$  1.31

$  1.31

176

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.  FINANCE COSTS, NET

For the years ended December 31
Interest expense1
Amortization of debt issue costs

Amortization of premium

Interest on lease liabilities

Loss (gain) on interest rate hedges
Interest capitalized2
Accretion

Loss on debt extinguishment

Finance income

Total

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

357  
1

(1)

5

3

(16)

48

–

(42)
355  

$ 

342

2

(1)

5

(5)

(24)

41

15

(28)

$ 

347

1  Interest in the consolidated statements of cash flow is presented on a cash basis. In 2021, cash interest paid was $303 million (2020: $295 million).
2  For the year ended December 31, 2021, the general capitalization rate was 6.00% (2020: 5.90%). 

15.  CASH FLOW – OTHER ITEMS

OPERATING CASH FLOWS – OTHER ITEMS 

For the years ended December 31

Adjustments for non-cash income statement items:

  Gain on non-hedge derivatives

  Stock-based compensation expense 

  Loss (gain) on warrant investments at FVPL

Increase in estimate of rehabilitation costs at closed mines

  Net inventory impairment charges (note 17)

  Remeasurement of silver sale liability (note 29)

  Buzwagi supplies obsolescence

Change in other assets and liabilities
Settlement of stock-based compensation1
Settlement of rehabilitation obligations

Other operating activities

Cash flow arising from changes in:

  Accounts receivable

Inventory

  Other current assets 

  Accounts payable
  Other current liabilities1
Change in working capital

FINANCING CASH FLOWS – OTHER ITEMS

For the years ended December 31

Pueblo Viejo JV partner shareholder loan

GoT shareholder loan

Debt extinguishment costs 

Other

Other financing activities

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

(2) 
81

(10)

87

(9)

90

29

(104)

–

(70)

(97)

(106)

$ 

(190)

$ 

(192)

121

(133)

42
(49)

$ 

(211)

16

18

13

–

21

(120)

(97)

(133)
(203) 

(46) 
(163)

(178)

140
(26)
(273) 

$ 

$  

$ 

2021

2020

$ 

131  

$ 

(16)

–

–

$ 

115  

$ 

42

–

(15)

1

28

1   2020 figures have been restated to reflect the change in presentation to present settlement of stock-based compensation ($97 million) separately from other 

current liabilities.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 177

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.  INVESTMENTS

EQUITY ACCOUNTING METHOD INVESTMENT CONTINUITY

At January 1, 2020

Equity pick-up from equity investees

Dividends received from equity investees

Shareholder loan repayment/disbursements

At December 31, 2020

Equity pick-up from equity investees

Dividends received from equity investees

Shareholder loan repayment

At December 31, 2021

Kibali

Jabal Sayid

Zaldívar

Other

Total

$  3,218  

$ 

296  

$ 

955  

$ 

58  

$  4,527

201

(140)

–

74

–

(1)

12

–

–

1

(1)

(3)

288

(141)

(4)

$  3,279  

$ 

369  

$ 

967  

$ 

55  

$  4,670

219

(231)

–

159

(146)

–

68

(142)

–

–

(1)

(2)

446

(520)

(2)

$  3,267  

$ 

382  

$ 

893  

$ 

52  

$  4,594

SUMMARIZED EQUITY INVESTEE FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Kibali

Jabal Sayid

Zaldívar

For the years ended December 31

Revenue
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)

Depreciation 

Finance expense (income)

Other expense (income)

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income

Total comprehensive income 

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEET

For the years ended December 31
Cash and equivalents1
Other current assets2
Total current assets
Non-current assets2
Total assets
Current financial liabilities (excluding trade,  
  other payables & provisions)

Other current liabilities

Total current liabilities
Non-current financial liabilities (excluding trade,  
  other payables & provisions)

Other non-current liabilities

Total non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

2021

2020

2021

$  1,469  

$  1,440  

$ 

515

314

(1)

68
573  
(141)
432  
432  

$ 

$ 

$ 

Kibali

2021
$  1,116  

298

$  1,414  
4,310
$  5,724  

495

387

(1)

43
516  
(94)
422  
422  

2020

944  
131

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$  1,075  
4,559
$  5,634  

$ 

$ 

16  

$ 

143
159  

$ 

19  

103
122  

42

68

$ 

709
777  
936  
$ 
$  4,788  

$ 

653
695  
817  
$ 
$  4,817  

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2020

400  
154

54

–

4
188  
(40)
148  
148  

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

847  
469

158

(4)

25
199  
(61)
138  
138  

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

595
380

143

1

32

39

(15)

24

24

597  
157

42

1

(5)
402  
(84)
318  
318  

Jabal Sayid

Zaldívar

2021

2020

2021

85  

$ 

178
263  
419
682  

13  

136
149  

–

14
14  
163  
519  

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

71  
68
139  
429
568  

4  

59
63  

–

12
12  
75  
493  

$ 

$ 

171  
493
664  

2,031
$  2,695  

$ 

$ 

142
226  

134

$ 

529
663  
889  
$ 
$  1,806  

84  

$ 

$ 

$ 

2020
271

392

663

2,123

$  2,786

36

257

293

125

545

670

963

$ 

$ 

$ 

$  1,823

1   Kibali cash and equivalents are subject to various steps before they can be distributed to the joint venture shareholders and are held across three banks in 

the Democratic Republic of Congo, including two domestic banks. 

2   Zaldívar other current assets include inventory of $384 million (2020: $323 million). The 2020 figures have been updated to reflect a $284 million reclassification 

of short-term inventory to long-term inventory. 

The information above reflects the amounts presented in the financial information of the joint venture adjusted for differences between IFRS 
and local GAAP and fair value adjustments on acquisition of equity in investees.

178

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RECONCILIATION OF SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO CARRYING VALUE 

Opening net assets

Income for the period

Dividends received from equity investees

Dividends declared in prior year and received in current year

Closing net assets, December 31

Barrick’s share of net assets 

Equity earnings adjustment

Goodwill recognition

Carrying value

17.  INVENTORIES

As at December 31

Raw materials

   Ore in stockpiles

  Ore on leach pads
Mine operating supplies

Work in process

Finished products

Non-current ore in stockpiles and on leach pads1

Kibali

Jabal Sayid

$  4,817  

$ 

493  

Zaldívar

$  1,823

432

(461)

–

318

(292)

–

138

(285)

130

$  4,788

$519  

$  1,806

2,156

–

1,111

259

–

123

903

(10)

–

$  3,267  

$ 

382  

$ 

893

Gold

Copper

2021

2020

2021

2020

$  2,587

$  2,742

$ 

174

$ 

114

663
593

108

76

591
615

117

114

–
79

–

90

–
54

–

97

$  4,027

(2,462)

$  1,565

$  4,179

(2,452)

$  1,727

$ 

343

$ 

265

(174)

(114)

$ 

169

$ 

151

1  Ore that we do not expect to process in the next 12 months is classified within other long-term assets.

INVENTORY IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

ORE IN STOCKPILES 

For the years ended December 31

2021

2020

As at December 31

2021

2020

Cortez

Phoenix

Carlin

Inventory impairment charges

$ 

$ 

22  
–

–
22  

$ 

$ 

17

10

2

29

Gold
  Carlin

  Pueblo Viejo

  Turquoise Ridge

  Loulo-Gounkoto

  North Mara

  Cortez

  Lagunas Norte

  Veladero

  Phoenix

  Tongon

  Porgera

  Buzwagi

  Hemlo

  Other

Copper
  Lumwana

$ 

986  
674

405

161

93

81

–

51

73

33

30

–

–

–

$  1,029

646

365

171

133

127

73

58

47

33

30

15

14

1

174

114

$  2,761  

$  2,856

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 179

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ORE ON LEACH PADS 

As at December 31

2021

2020

18.   ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND OTHER 

CURRENT ASSETS

Gold

Carlin

Veladero

Cortez

Long Canyon

Turquoise Ridge
Phoenix

Pierina

Lagunas Norte

$ 

209  
196

113

77

41
23

4

$ 

179

133

58

33

39
26

2

–
663  

121

591

$ 

$ 

Purchase Commitments
At December 31, 2021, we had purchase obligations for supplies and 
consumables of approximately $1,718 million (2020: $1,882 million).

19.  PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT

As at December 31

Accounts receivable

2021

2020

  Amounts due from concentrate sales

$ 

242  

$ 

  Other receivables

Other current assets
  Value added taxes recoverable1

  Prepaid expenses
  Other2

381

$ 

623  

$ 

319

206

87

265

293

558

208

227

84

$ 

612  

$ 

519

1   Primarily  includes  VAT  and  fuel  tax  recoverables  of  $25  million  in  Mali, 
$90 million in Tanzania, $141 million in Zambia, $39 million in Argentina, 
and  $11  million  in  the  Dominican  Republic  (Dec.  31,  2020:  $59  million,  
$35 million, $52 million, $37 million, and $11 million, respectively).

2   Balance  includes  $50  million  asset  reflecting  the  final  settlement  of 

Zambian tax matters. 

At January 1, 2021

Net of accumulated depreciation
Additions5
Capitalized interest

Divestiture

Disposals

Depreciation

Impairment reversals (impairments)
Transfers6
At December 31, 2021

At December 31, 2021

Cost

Accumulated depreciation and impairments

Net carrying amount – December 31, 2021

Buildings, plant 
and equipment1

Mining property
costs subject
to depreciation2,4

Mining property
costs not subject

to depreciation2,3

$  7,473  

$ 13,569  

$  3,586  

23

–

(50)

(7)

(1,139)

42

194

154

–

(2)

(1)

(1,053)

(13)

1,831

$  6,536  

$ 14,485  

$ 17,237  

(10,701)

$  6,536  

$ 31,824  

(17,339)

$ 14,485  

2,366

16

(1)

(10)

–

1

(2,025)

$  3,933  

$ 15,876  

(11,943)

$  3,933  

Total

$ 24,628

2,543

16

(53)

(18)

(2,192)

30

–

$ 24,954

$ 64,937

(39,983)

$ 24,954

1   Additions  include  $22  million  of  right-of-use  assets  for  lease  arrangements  entered  into  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021  (2020:  $4  million). 
Depreciation includes depreciation for leased right-of-use assets of $18 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 (2020: $21 million). The net carrying 
amount of leased right-of-use assets was $53 million as at December 31, 2021 (2020: $50 million). 

2   Includes capitalized reserve acquisition costs, capitalized development costs and capitalized exploration and evaluation costs other than exploration license 

costs included in intangible assets.

3   Assets not subject to depreciation include construction-in-progress, projects and acquired mineral resources and exploration potential at operating minesites 

and development projects.

4   Assets  subject  to  depreciation  include  the  following  items  for  production  stage  properties:  acquired  mineral  reserves  and  resources,  capitalized  mine 

development costs, capitalized stripping and capitalized exploration and evaluation costs.

5  Additions include revisions to the capitalized cost of closure and rehabilitation activities.
6  Primarily relates to long-lived assets that are transferred between categories within PP&E once they are placed into service. 

180

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At January 1, 2020

Cost

Accumulated depreciation and impairments

Net carrying amount – January 1, 2020
Additions5
Capitalized interest
Disposals

Depreciation

Impairment reversals
Transfers6
At December 31, 2020

At December 31, 2020

Cost

Accumulated depreciation and impairments

Net carrying amount – December 31, 2020

Buildings, plant 
and equipment1

Mining property
costs subject
to depreciation2,4

Mining property
costs not subject

to depreciation2,3

$ 18,544  

(10,791)

$  7,753  

10

–
(24)

(1,219)

260

693

$ 27,268  

(14,980)

$ 12,288  

259

–
(1)

(1,146)

412

1,757

$  7,473  

$ 13,569  

$ 18,361  

(10,888)

$  7,473  

$ 29,901  

(16,332)

$ 13,569  

$ 16,050  

(11,950)

$  4,100  

1,919

24
(12)

–

5

(2,450)

$  3,586  

$ 15,531  

(11,945)

$  3,586  

Total

$ 61,862

(37,721)

$ 24,141

2,188

24
(37)

(2,365)

677

–

$ 24,628

$ 63,793

(39,165)

$ 24,628

1   Additions  include  $22  million  of  right-of-use  assets  for  lease  arrangements  entered  into  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021  (2020:  $4  million). 
Depreciation includes depreciation for leased right-of-use assets of $18 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 (2020: $21 million). The net carrying 
amount of leased right-of-use assets was $53 million as at December 31, 2021 (2020: $50 million). 

2   Includes capitalized reserve acquisition costs, capitalized development costs and capitalized exploration and evaluation costs other than exploration license 

costs included in intangible assets.

3   Assets not subject to depreciation include construction-in-progress, projects and acquired mineral resources and exploration potential at operating minesites 

and development projects.

4   Assets  subject  to  depreciation  include  the  following  items  for  production  stage  properties:  acquired  mineral  reserves  and  resources,  capitalized  mine 

development costs, capitalized stripping and capitalized exploration and evaluation costs.

5  Additions include revisions to the capitalized cost of closure and rehabilitation activities.
6  Primarily relates to long-lived assets that are transferred between categories within PP&E once they are placed into service. 

c)  Capital Commitments
In addition to entering into various operational commitments in the 
normal course of business, we had commitments of approximately 
$443  million  at  December  31,  2021  (2020:  $223  million)  for 
construction activities at our sites and projects.

d)  Other Lease Disclosure
The Company leases various buildings, plant and equipment as part 
of the normal course of operations. Lease terms are negotiated on 
an individual basis and contain a wide range of different terms and 
conditions. Refer to note 25 for a lease maturity analysis. Included 
in net income for 2021 are short-term payments and variable lease 
payments  not  included  in  the  measurement  of  lease  liabilities  of 
$10 million (2020: $14 million) and $67 million (2020: $35 million), 
respectively.

a)   Mineral Property Costs Not Subject  

to Depreciation

Carrying amount at December 31
Construction-in-progress1
Acquired mineral resources and 
  exploration potential

Projects

  Pascua-Lama

  Norte Abierto

  Donlin Gold

2021

2020

$  2,114  

$  1,208

165

780

662

212

786

741

653

198

$  3,933  

$  3,586

1  Represents assets under construction at our operating minesites.

b)   Changes in Gold and Copper Mineral  

Life of Mine Plan

As part of our annual business cycle, we prepare updated estimates 
of proven and probable gold and copper mineral reserves and the 
portion  of  resources  considered  probable  of  economic  extraction 
for each mineral property. This forms the basis for our LOM plans. 
We  prospectively  revise  calculations  of  amortization  expense  for 
property,  plant  and  equipment  amortized  using  the  UOP  method, 
where the denominator is our LOM ounces. The effect of changes 
in  our  LOM  on  amortization  expense  for  2021  was  a  $128  million 
decrease (2020: $170 million decrease).

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 181

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20.  GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
a)  Intangible Assets

Opening balance January 1, 2020
Additions

Disposals

Amortization and impairment losses

Closing balance December 31, 2020
Disposals5
Amortization and impairment losses

Closing balance December 31, 2021

Cost

Accumulated amortization and impairment losses

Net carrying amount December 31, 2021

Water rights1
$  72  

–

(5)

–

Technology2
7  
$ 
–

–

(1)

$  67  

$ 

6  

(6)

–

$  61  

$  61  

–

$  61  

–

–

$ 

6  

$  17  

(11)

$ 

6  

Supply
contracts3
7  
$ 
–

–

(3)

4  

–

(3)

1  

$ 

$ 

$  39  

(38)

$ 

1  

Exploration 
potential4
$  140  

5

(41)

(12)

Total

$  226
5

(46)

(16)

$  92  

$  169

(10)

–

$  82  

$  252  

(170)

$  82  

(16)

(3)

$  150

$  369

(219)

$  150

1  Relates to water rights in South America, and will be amortized through cost of sales when we begin using these in the future.
2  The amount is amortized through cost of sales using the UOP method over LOM ounces of the Pueblo Viejo mine, with no assumed residual value.
3   Relates to a supply agreement with Michelin North America Inc. to secure a supply of tires and is amortized over the effective term of the contract through 

cost of sales.

4   Exploration potential consists of the estimated fair value attributable to exploration licenses acquired as a result of a business combination or asset acquisition. 

The carrying value of the licenses will be transferred to PP&E when the development of attributable mineral resources commences.

5  Exploration potential disposals relate to the sale of Acacia exploration properties.

b) Goodwill

Carlin
Cortez1
Turquoise Ridge

Phoenix

Hemlo

Loulo-Gounkoto

Total

Closing balance 
December 31, 2020

$  1,294  

Additions

$ 

–  

$ 

Disposals

Closing balance
December 31,2021

899

722

119

63

1,672

$  4,769  

–

–

–

–

–

$ 

–  

$ 

–  
–

–

–

–

–
–  

$  1,294

899

722

119

63

1,672

$  4,769

1   Starting in Q1 2021, Goldrush is included as part of Cortez as the CODM began reviewing the operating results and assessing performance on a combined 

level. The goodwill of Cortez and Goldrush has been combined and the prior period has been changed to reflect this presentation.

On a total basis, the gross amount and accumulated impairment losses are as follows:

Cost 

Accumulated impairment losses December 31, 2021

Net carrying amount December 31, 2021

$ 12,211

(7,442)

$  4,769

21.  IMPAIRMENT AND REVERSAL OF NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
Summary of impairments (reversals)
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded net impairment reversals of $63 million (2020: net impairment reversals of $269 million) 
for non-current assets, as summarized in the following table:

For the years ended December 31

Tanzania

Cortez

Pueblo Viejo

Lagunas Norte

Golden Sunlight

Hemlo

Intangible assets

Other

Total impairment (reversals) losses of long-lived assets

182

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

5  
–

(7)

(86)

15

5

–

5
(63) 

$ 

(304)

10

5

–

–

–

12

8

$ 

(269)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2021 Indicators of Impairment and Reversals
In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  as  per  our  policy,  we  performed  our 
annual goodwill impairment test as required by IAS 36 and identified 
no impairments. Also in the fourth quarter of 2021, we reviewed the 
updated LOM plans for our other operating minesites for indicators 
of  impairment  or  reversal.  We  noted  an  indicator  of  impairment  at 
Long Canyon and an indicator of impairment reversal at Lumwana.

Long Canyon
The  delayed  timing  of  permitting  activities  and  an  updated 
geological  model  resulting  in  lower  production  over  the  LOM  plan 
represented  impairment  triggers  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021. 
We  have  performed  an  analysis  and  concluded  that  the  carrying 
amount remains recoverable under the revised LOM plan. The key 
assumptions used in this assessment are consistent with our testing 
of goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of 2021, as listed below.

Lumwana
In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021,  the  Zambian  government  enacted 
amendments  to  the  income  tax  laws,  effective  January  1,  2022, 
which allow for the deductibility of royalties when calculating income 
tax.  We  determined  that  this  was  an  indicator  of  an  impairment 
reversal,  therefore  we  performed  an  analysis  of  the  FVLCD  and 
concluded that no reversal was appropriate at this time.

First Quarter 2021
Lagunas Norte
As  described  in  note  4,  on  February  16,  2021,  we  announced  an 
agreement to sell our 100% interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine 
in  Peru  to  Boroo  for  total  consideration  of  up  to  $81  million.  An 
impairment reversal of $86 million was recognized in the first quarter 
of 2021 based on the March 31, 2021 fair value of the consideration 
to  be  received  of  $63  million.  Lagunas  Norte  was  in  a  net  liability 
position,  which  resulted  in  an  impairment  reversal  that  exceeded 
the FVLCD. The transaction closed on June 1, 2021.

Porgera
On April 9, 2021, the Papua New Guinea (“PNG”) government and 
Barrick  Niugini  Limited  (“BNL”,  the  95%  owner  and  operator  of 
the  Porgera  joint  venture)  agreed  on  a  partnership  for  the  future 
ownership  and  operation  of  the  Porgera  mine.  Porgera  has  been 
on  care  and  maintenance  since April  2020,  when  the  government 
declined  to  renew  its  special  mining  lease  (“SML”).  The  financial 
impact  will  be  determined  once  all  definitive  agreements,  which  
are  currently  being  negotiated,  have  been  signed.  We  have 
determined  that  the  carrying  value  of  our  47.5%  share  of  Porgera 
($299  million  as  at  December  31,  2021)  remains  recoverable  and 
there  is  no  impairment  loss  to  recognize.  The  ultimate  resolution 
of  this  dispute  may  differ  from  this  assumption  and  there  is  no 
certainty  that  the  carrying  value  will  remain  recoverable.  Refer  to 
note 35 for more information.

2020 Indicators of Impairment and Reversals
Fourth Quarter 2020
In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2020,  as  per  our  policy,  we  performed  our 
annual goodwill impairment test as required by IAS 36 and identified 
no impairments. Also in the fourth quarter of 2020, we reviewed the 
updated LOM plans for our other operating minesites for indicators 
of impairment or reversal. We noted one indicator of impairment at 
Veladero and no indicators of impairment reversal.

Veladero
In  December  2020,  Veladero  began  a  transition  to  a  new  heap 
leach  valley  facility  to  process  subsequent  phases  of  the  open 
pit. During the transition phase, heap leach processing operations 
at  Veladero  were  reduced  until  the  Phase  6  leach  pad  expansion 
was  commissioned  later  in  2021.  We  performed  an  analysis  and 
concluded that the carrying amount remains recoverable under the 
revised  LOM  plan.  The  key  assumptions  used  in  this  assessment 
were consistent with our testing of goodwill impairment in the fourth 
quarter of 2020, as listed below.

Porgera
As described in note 35, on April 24, 2020, we received communication  
from the Government of Papua New Guinea that the Special Mining 
Lease  will  not  be  extended,  and  therefore  Porgera  was  placed 
on  temporary  care  and  maintenance  on  April  25,  2020.  We  have 
performed an analysis and concluded that the carrying value of our 
47.5%  share  of  Porgera  ($297  million  as  at  December  31,  2020) 
remains  recoverable.  The  ultimate  resolution  of  this  dispute  may 
differ from this assumption and there is no certainty that the carrying 
value will remain recoverable.

Tanzania
On January 24, 2020, Barrick formalized the establishment of a joint 
venture between Barrick and the GoT and resolution of all outstanding 
disputes  between  Barrick  and  the  GoT,  including  the  lifting  of  the 
previous  concentrate  export  ban,  effective  immediately.  Effective 
January  1,  2020,  the  GoT  received  a  free  carried  shareholding 
of  16%  in  each  of  the  Tanzania  mines  (Bulyanhulu,  Buzwagi  and 
North Mara), a 16% interest in the shareholder loans owed by the 
operating companies and will receive half of the economic benefits 
from  the Tanzanian  operations  from  taxes,  royalties,  clearing  fees 
and participation in all cash distributions made by the mines, after 
the recoupment of capital investments. 

We  have  determined  this  to  be  an  indicator  of  impairment 
reversal, as the resolution of the long-standing dispute has led to a 
decrease in the risk adjustment previously included in the weighted 
average cost of capital (“WACC”) and the removal of the estimated 
impact  of  the  previously  anticipated  issuance  of  the  equity  to  the 
GoT. The key assumptions and estimates used in determining the 
FVLCD are a short-term gold price of $1,350 per ounce, long-term 
gold  price  of  $1,300  per  ounce,  NAV  multiples  of  1.1–1.3  and  a 
WACC  of  5.4%–6.2%.  Management  assumed  the  resumption  of 
concentrate  sales  and  exports  commencing  in  the  second  quarter 
of 2020 and the resumption of production from underground mining 
at Bulyanhulu in 2020. We identified that the FVLCD exceeded the 
carrying value and a full non-current asset impairment reversal was 
recognized in 2020 of $663 million at Bulyanhulu and $46 million at 
North Mara, based on a FVLCD of $1,237 million and $967 million, 
respectively. No impairment reversal was recognized at Buzwagi.

Similar assumptions were also used to determine the fair value 
of the 16% equity interest in each of the operating mines that was 
given to the GoT. The recognition of this non-controlling interest in 
the three Tanzanian mines resulted in a loss of $238 million being 
recognized  in  the  first  quarter  of  2020. The  assignment  of  16%  of 
the existing shareholder loans also resulted in the recognition of a 
$167 million loss in the first quarter of 2020. 

As  the  signing  of  the  agreement  to  resolve  all  outstanding 
disputes  with  the  GoT  caused  the  impairment  reversal,  loss  
on  equity  issuance  and  loss  on  assignment  of  shareholder  
loans,  the  financial  impact  has  been  aggregated  and  presented  
as  a  $304  million  net  impairment  reversal  on  the  consolidated  
statement of income.

Key Assumptions
Recoverable amount has been determined based on the estimated 
FVLCD,  which  has  been  determined  to  be  greater  than  the  VIU 
amounts. The key assumptions and estimates used in determining 
the  FVLCD  are  related  to  future  metal  prices,  weighted  average 
costs  of  capital,  NAV  multiples  for  gold  assets,  operating  costs, 
exchange 
future 
production  levels,  continued  license  to  operate,  evidence  of  value 
from  current  year  disposals  and  the  expected  start  of  production 
for our projects. In addition, assumptions are related to observable 
market  evaluation  metrics,  including  identification  of  comparable 
entities,  and  associated  market  values  per  ounce  and  per  pound 
of  reserves  and/or  resources,  as  well  as  the  fair  value  of  mineral 
resources outside of LOM plans.

rates,  capital  expenditures,  closure  costs, 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 183

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsGold
For  the  gold  segments  where  a  recoverable  amount  was  required 
to  be  determined,  FVLCD  was  determined  by  calculating  the  net 
present  value  (“NPV”)  of  the  future  cash  flows  expected  to  be 
generated  by  the  mines  and  projects  within  the  CGU  (Level  3  of 
the  fair  value  hierarchy). The  estimates  of  future  cash  flows  were 
derived from the most recent LOM plans and, where the LOM plans 
exclude  a  material  portion  of  total  reserves  and  resources,  we 
assign  value  to  reserves  and  resources  not  considered  in  these 
models.  Based  on  observable  market  or  publicly  available  data, 
including forward prices and equity sell-side analyst forecasts, we 
make  an  assumption  of  future  gold  and  silver  prices  to  estimate 
future  revenues.  The  future  cash  flows  for  each  gold  mine  are 
discounted using a real WACC, which reflects specific market risk 
factors  for  each  mine.  Some  gold  companies  trade  at  a  market 
capitalization  greater  than  the  NPV  of  their  expected  cash  flows. 
Market  participants  describe  this  as  a  “NAV  multiple”,  which 
represents the multiple applied to the NPV to arrive at the trading 
price. The NAV multiple is generally understood to take account of 
a variety of additional value factors such as the exploration potential 
of the mineral property, namely the ability to find and produce more 
metal  than  what  is  currently  included  in  the  LOM  plan  or  reserve 
and resource estimates, and the benefit of gold price optionality. As 
a result, we applied a specific NAV multiple to the NPV of each CGU 
within each gold segment based on the NAV multiples observed in 
the market in recent periods and that we judged to be appropriate 
to the CGU.

Assumptions
The  short-term  and  long-term  gold  price  assumptions  used  in  our 
fourth  quarter  2021  impairment  testing  are  $1,700  and  $1,500 
per  ounce,  respectively.  The  short-term  and  long-term  gold  price 
assumptions  used  in  our  fourth  quarter  2020  impairment  testing 
were  $1,700  and  $1,400  per  ounce,  respectively.  The  increase  in 
the long-term gold price assumption from 2020 was not considered 
an  indicator  of  impairment  reversal  as  the  increased  price  would 
not, in isolation, have resulted in the identification of an impairment 
reversal  at  our  mines  with  reversible  impairments.  The  other  key 
assumptions  used  in  our  impairment  testing,  based  on  the  CGUs 
tested in each year, are summarized in the table below: 

2021

$3.00

2020

$3.00

Copper price per lb (long-term)

WACC – gold (range)

WACC – gold (avg)

WACC – copper 

NAV multiple – gold (avg)

LOM years – gold (avg)

Sensitivities
Should  there  be  a  significant  increase  or  decline  in  commodity 
prices,  we  would  take  actions  to  assess  the  implications  on  our 
LOM plans, including the determination of reserves and resources, 
and  the  appropriate  cost  structure  for  the  CGU.  The  recoverable 
amount of the CGU would be affected by these changes and also be 
impacted by other market factors such as changes in NAV multiples 
and the value per ounce/pound of comparable market entities.

We  performed  a  sensitivity  analysis  on  each  gold  CGU  that 
was tested as part of the goodwill impairment test, as well as those 
gold CGUs which we believe are most sensitive to changes in the 
key assumptions. We flexed the gold prices and the WACC, which 
are  the  most  significant  assumptions  that  impact  the  impairment 
calculations.  We  first  assumed  a  +/-  $100  per  ounce  change  in 
our  gold  price  assumptions,  while  holding  all  other  assumptions 
constant.  We  then  assumed  a  +/-1%  change  in  our  WACC, 
independent from the change in gold prices, while holding all other 
assumptions constant. Finally, we assumed a +/- 0.1 change in the 
NAV multiple, while holding all other assumptions constant. These 
sensitivities help to determine the theoretical impairment losses or 
impairment reversals that would be recorded with these changes in 
gold prices, WACC and NAV multiple. If the gold price per ounce was 
decreased by $100, the following impairments would be recognized: 
a goodwill impairment of $329 million at Loulo-Gounkoto and a non-
current  asset  impairment  of  $134  million  at  Veladero.  If  the  NAV 
multiple was decreased by 0.1, a non-current asset impairment of 
$91 million would be recognized at Veladero.

We also performed a sensitivity analysis on the Lumwana CGU. 
We  flexed  the  copper  prices  and  the  WACC,  which  are  the  most 
significant  assumptions  that  impact  the  impairment  calculations. 
We  first  assumed  a  +/-  $0.25  per  pound  change  in  our  copper 
price  assumptions,  while  holding  all  other  assumptions  constant. 
We then assumed a +/-1% change in our WACC, independent from 
the  change  in  copper  prices,  while  holding  all  other  assumptions 
constant.  These  sensitivities  help  to  determine  the  theoretical 
impairment losses or impairment reversals that would be recorded 
with these changes in copper prices and WACC. If the copper price 
per pound was decreased by $0.25, a non-current asset impairment 
of $393 million would be recognized. If the copper price per pound 
was increased by $0.25, a non-current asset impairment reversal of 
$351 million would be recognized.

The  carrying  value  of  the  CGUs  that  are  most  sensitive  to 
changes in the key assumptions used in the FVLCD calculation are:

3%–8%

3%–12%

As at December 31, 2021

4%  

12%

1.2

19

5%

n/a

1.3

20

Loulo-Gounkoto

Lumwana

Veladero

Long Canyon

Carrying Value

$  4,214

1,578

774

495

184

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
22.  OTHER ASSETS

As at December 31
Value added taxes receivable1
Other investments2
Notes receivable3
Norte Abierto JV Partner Receivable
Restricted cash4
Prepayments5
Derivative assets6
Other

$ 

199  
414

$ 

123

150

147

253

53

170

193

428

154

193

146

161

40

148

$  1,509  

$  1,463

1   Includes VAT and fuel tax receivables of $47 million in Argentina, $94 million  
in Tanzania and $58 million in Chile (Dec. 31, 2020: $52 million, $79 million 
and $61 million, respectively). 

2   Includes equity investments in other mining companies. 
3   Primarily  represents  the  interest  bearing  promissory  note  due  from 

NovaGold.

4   Primarily represents the cash balance at Pueblo Viejo that is contractually 
restricted in respect of disbursements for environmental rehabilitation that 
are expected to occur near the end of Pueblo Viejo’s mine life.
5  Primarily relates to prepaid royalties at Carlin and Pueblo Viejo.
6   Primarily consists of contingent consideration received as part of the sale 

of Massawa and Lagunas Norte. Refer to note 4. 

23.  ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

As at December 31

Accounts payable

Accruals

24.  OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

2021

2020

As at December 31

2021

2020

Provision for environmental rehabilitation  

(note 27b)

Deposit on Pueblo Viejo gold and silver   
  streaming agreement

Share-based payments (note 34a)

Pueblo Viejo JV partner shareholder loan

Other

$ 

166  

$ 

131

43

57

9

63
338  

$ 

47

67

–

61

$ 

306

25.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 
Financial  instruments  include  cash;  evidence  of  ownership  in  an 
entity;  or  a  contract  that  imposes  an  obligation  on  one  party  and 
conveys a right to a second entity to deliver/receive cash or another 
financial  instrument.  Information  on  certain  types  of  financial 
instruments  is  included  elsewhere  in  these  consolidated  financial 
statements  as  follows:  accounts  receivable  (note  18);  restricted 
share units (note 34a).

a)  Cash and Equivalents
Cash  and  equivalents  include  cash,  term  deposits,  treasury  bills 
and money market investments with original maturities of less than 
90 days.

$ 

2021

539  
909

$ 

2020

929

529

$  1,448  

$  1,458

As at December 31

Cash deposits

Term deposits

Money market investments

2021

2020

$  3,691  
1,582

7

$  3,713

1,469

6

$  5,280  

$  5,188

Of  total  cash  and  cash  equivalents  as  of  December  31,  2021, 
$nil  (2020:  $nil)  was  held  in  subsidiaries  which  have  regulatory 
regulations,  contractual  restrictions  or  operate  in  countries  where 
exchange  controls  and  other  legal  restrictions  apply  and  are 
therefore not available for general use by the Company. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 185

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
b)  Debt and Interest1

5.7% notes3,10
5.25% notes4
5.80% notes5,10
6.35% notes6,10
Other fixed rate notes7,10
Leases8
Other debt obligations
5.75% notes9,10

Less: current portion12

5.7% notes3,10
3.85%/5.25% notes4
5.80% notes5,10
6.35% notes6,10
Other fixed rate notes7,10
Leases8
Other debt obligations
5.75% notes9,10
Acacia credit facility11

Less: current portion12

Closing 
balance 
Dec. 31, 2020

Proceeds

Repayments

Amortization 
and other2

Closing 
balance 
Dec. 31, 2021

$ 

842  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

$ 

1  

$ 

744

395

594

1,081

66

590

843

$  5,155  

(20)

$  5,135  

$ 

$ 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–  

–

–  

–

–

–

–

(20)

(7)

–

$ 

(27) 

–

$ 

(27) 

$ 

$ 

–

–

–

1

22

(2)

–

22  

–

22  

Closing 
balance 
Dec. 31, 2019

Proceeds

Repayments

$ 

842  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

Amortization 
and other2
–  

$ 

1,079

395

594

1,080

96

594

842

14

$  5,536  

(375)

$  5,161  

$ 

$ 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–  

–

–  

(337)

–

–

–

(26)

(2)

–

(14)

$ 

(379) 

–

$ 

(379) 

$ 

$ 

2

–

–

1

(4)

(2)

1

–

(2) 

–

(2) 

843

744

395

594

1,082

68

581

843

$  5,150

(15)

$  5,135

Closing 
balance 
Dec. 31, 2020

$ 

842

744

395

594

1,081

66

590

843

–

$  5,155

(20)

$  5,135

1 

 The agreements that govern our long-term debt each contain various provisions which are not summarized herein. These provisions allow Barrick, at its 
option,  to  redeem  indebtedness  prior  to  maturity  at  specified  prices  and  also  may  permit  redemption  of  debt  by  Barrick  upon  the  occurrence  of  certain 
specified changes in tax legislation.

2  Amortization of debt premium/discount and increases (decreases) in capital leases.
3  Consists of $850 million (2020: $850 million) of our wholly-owned subsidiary Barrick North America Finance LLC (“BNAF”) notes due 2041.
4  Consists of $750 million (2020: $750 million) of 5.25% notes which mature in 2042. 
5  Consists of $400 million (2020: $400 million) of 5.80% notes which mature in 2034.
6  Consists of $600 million (2020: $600 million) of 6.35% notes which mature in 2036.
7 

 Consists of $1.1 billion (2020: $1.1 billion) in conjunction with our wholly-owned subsidiary BNAF and our wholly-owned subsidiary Barrick (PD) Australia 
Finance Pty Ltd. (“BPDAF”). This consists of $250 million (2020: $250 million) of BNAF notes due 2038 and $850 million (2020: $850 million) of BPDAF notes 
due 2039.
 Consists  primarily  of  leases  at  Nevada  Gold  Mines,  $18  million,  Loulo-Gounkoto,  $25  million,  Lumwana,  $6  million,  Hemlo,  $4  million,  Pascua-Lama,  
$2 million and Tongon, $4 million (2020: $18 million, $28 million, $8 million, $2 million, $2 million and $4 million, respectively).
 Consists of $850 million (2020: $850 million) in conjunction with our wholly-owned subsidiary BNAF.

9 
10   We provide an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee on all BNAF, BPDAF, Barrick Gold Finance Company (“BGFC”), and Barrick (HMC) Mining (“BHMC”) 
notes  and  generally  provide  such  guarantees  on  all  BNAF,  BPDAF,  BGFC,  and  BHMC  notes  issued,  which  rank  equally  with  our  other  unsecured  and 
unsubordinated obligations.

8 

11    Consists of an export credit backed term loan facility.
12   The current portion of long-term debt consists of leases ($15 million; 2020: $13 million), and other debt obligations ($nil; 2020: $7 million).

186

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
5.7% Notes
In  June  2011,  BNAF  issued  an  aggregate  of  $4.0  billion  in  debt 
securities  consisting  of  $850  million  of  5.70%  notes  that  mature 
in  2041  issued  by  BNAF  (collectively,  the  “BNAF  Notes”).  Barrick 
provides  an  unconditional  and  irrevocable  guarantee  of  the  BNAF 
Notes,  which  rank  equally  with  Barrick’s  other  unsecured  and 
unsubordinated obligations.

3.85% and 5.25% Notes
On  April  3,  2012,  we  issued  an  aggregate  of  $2  billion  in  debt 
securities comprised of $1.25 billion of 3.85% notes that mature in 
2022 and $750 million of 5.25% notes that mature in 2042. During 
2015, $913 million of the 3.85% notes was repaid. On January 31, 
2020, the remaining $337 million of the 3.85% notes was repaid.

Other Fixed Rate Notes
On  October  16,  2009,  we  issued  debentures  through  our  wholly-
owned  indirect  subsidiary  BPDAF  consisting  of  $850  million  of 
30-year  notes  with  a  coupon  rate  of  5.95%.  We  also  provide  an 
unconditional  and 
these  payments, 
irrevocable  guarantee  of 
which  rank  equally  with  our  other  unsecured  and  unsubordinated 
obligations. 

In  September  2008,  we  issued  an  aggregate  of  $1.25  billion 
of notes through our wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries BNAF and 
BGFC  consisting  of  $250  million  of  30-year  notes  with  a  coupon 
rate  of  7.5%.  We  also  provide  an  unconditional  and  irrevocable 
guarantee  of  these  payments,  which  rank  equally  with  our  other 
unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.

5.75% Notes
On  May  2,  2013,  we  issued  an  aggregate  of  $3  billion  in  notes 
through  Barrick  and  our  wholly-owned  indirect  subsidiary  BNAF 
consisting  of  $850  million  of  5.75%  notes  issued  by  BNAF  that 
mature  in  2043.  $2  billion  of  the  net  proceeds  from  this  offering 
was used to repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit 

facility  at  that  time.  We  provide  an  unconditional  and  irrevocable 
guarantee  on  the  $850  million  of  5.75%  notes  issued  by  BNAF, 
which  rank  equally  with  our  other  unsecured  and  unsubordinated 
obligations.

Amendment and Refinancing of the Credit Facility
In  May  2021,  we  amended  the  credit  and  guarantee  agreement 
(the  “Credit  Facility”)  with  certain  Lenders,  which  requires  such 
Lenders to make available to us a credit facility of $3.0 billion or the 
equivalent  amount  in  Canadian  dollars.  The  Credit  Facility,  which 
is  unsecured,  currently  has  an  interest  rate  of  London  Interbank 
Offered  Rate  (“LIBOR”)  plus  1.125%  on  drawn  amounts,  and  a 
standby rate of 0.11% on undrawn amounts. The Credit Facility also 
includes terms to replace LIBOR with a suitable replacement once 
that matter is resolved. The replacement of LIBOR is not expected 
to have an impact on the consolidated financial statements. As part 
of  the  amendment,  the  termination  date  of  the  Credit  Facility  was 
extended from January 2025 to May 2026. The Credit Facility was 
undrawn as at December 31, 2021.

Acacia Credit Facility
In  January  2013,  Acacia  concluded  negotiations  with  a  group  of 
commercial banks for the provision of an export credit backed term 
loan facility (the “Facility”) for the amount of $142 million. The Facility 
was  put  in  place  to  fund  a  substantial  portion  of  the  construction 
costs  of  the  carbon  in  leach  (“CIL”)  circuit  at  the  process  plant 
at  Bulyanhulu.  The  Facility  had  a  term  of  seven  years  and,  when 
drawn,  the  spread  over  LIBOR  was  250  basis  points. The  Facility 
was  repayable  in  equal  installments  over  the  term  of  the  Facility, 
after a two-year repayment holiday period. At December 31, 2014, 
the  full  value  of  the  Facility  was  drawn.  During  2015,  $14  million 
was  repaid.  During  2016,  $29  million  was  repaid.  During  2017,  
$28 million was repaid. During 2018, $28 million was repaid. During 
2019, $29 million was repaid. In January 2020, the final installment 
of $14 million was paid.

INTEREST

For the years ended December 31 

5.7% notes

3.85%/5.25% notes

5.80% notes

6.35% notes

Other fixed rate notes

Leases
Other debt obligations

5.75% notes

Deposits on Pascua-Lama silver sale agreement (note 29)

Deposits on Pueblo Viejo gold and silver streaming agreement (note 29)

Other interest

Less: interest capitalized

Effective
rate1
5.74%  
5.29%

5.85%

6.41%

6.38%

7.66%

6.25%

5.79%

2.82%

6.24%

2021

Interest
cost

$ 

49

40

23

38

70

5

35

49

4

31

21

$ 

365

(16)

$ 

349

Effective
rate1
5.73%

5.31%

5.84%

6.39%

6.38%

6.09%
6.16%

5.77%

0.53%

6.44%

2020

Interest
cost

$ 

49

41

23

38

70

5
34

49

1

33

–

$ 

343

(24)

$ 

319

1   The effective rate includes the stated interest rate under the debt agreement, amortization of debt issue costs and debt discount/premium and the impact of 

interest rate contracts designated in a hedging relationship with debt.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 187

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SCHEDULED DEBT REPAYMENTS1 

7.73% notes2
7.70% notes2
7.37% notes2
8.05% notes2
6.38% notes2
5.80% notes

5.80% notes
6.45% notes2
6.35% notes
7.50% notes3
5.95% notes3
5.70% notes

5.25% notes

5.75% notes

Issuer

Maturity 
Year

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027 and 
thereafter

Total

BGC

BGC

BGC

BGC

BGC

BGC

BGFC

BGC

BHMC

BNAF

BPDAF

BNAF

BGC

BNAF

2025  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

$ 

7  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

$ 

2025

2026

2026

2033

2034

2034

2035

2036

2038

2039

2041

2042

2043

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

5

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

32

15

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

200

200

200

300

600

250

850

850

750

850

7

5

32

15

200

200

200

300

600

250

850

850

750

850

Minimum annual payments  
  under leases 

$ 

$ 

–  

15  

$ 

$ 

–  

12  

$ 

$ 

–  

5  

$ 

$ 

12  

5  

$ 

$ 

47  

$  5,050  

$  5,109

3  

$ 

27  

$ 

67

1  This table illustrates the contractual undiscounted cash flows, and may not agree with the amounts disclosed in the consolidated balance sheet.
2  Included in Other debt obligations in the Long-Term Debt table.
3  Included in Other fixed rate notes in the Long-Term Debt table.

The time frame and manner in which we manage those risks varies 
for each item based upon our assessment of the risk and available 
alternatives for mitigating risk. For these particular risks, we believe 
that derivatives are an appropriate way of managing the risk.

We use derivatives as part of our risk management program to 
mitigate variability associated with changing market values related 
to the hedged item. Many of the derivatives we use meet the hedge 
effectiveness  criteria  and  are  designated  in  a  hedge  accounting 
relationship.

Certain derivatives are designated as either hedges of the fair 
value of recognized assets or liabilities or of firm commitments (“fair 
value hedges”) or hedges of highly probable forecasted transactions 
(“cash  flow  hedges”),  collectively  known  as  “accounting  hedges”. 
Hedges  that  are  expected  to  be  highly  effective  in  achieving 
offsetting  changes  in  fair  value  or  cash  flows  are  assessed  on  an 
ongoing  basis  to  determine  that  they  actually  have  been  highly 
effective  throughout  the  financial  reporting  periods  for  which  they 
were  designated.  Some  of  the  derivatives  we  use  are  effective  in 
achieving our risk management objectives, but they do not meet the 
strict hedge accounting criteria. These derivatives are considered to 
be “non-hedge derivatives”.

During  2021  and  2020,  we  did  not  enter  into  any  derivative 
contracts  for  US  dollar  interest  rates,  currencies,  or  commodity 
inputs. During 2020, we sold 57 thousand ounces of producer gold 
collars. We had no contracts outstanding at December 31, 2021.

c)  Derivative Instruments (“Derivatives”)
In  the  normal  course  of  business,  our  assets,  liabilities  and 
forecasted transactions, as reported in US dollars, are impacted by 
various market risks including, but not limited to:

Item

	Q Revenue

	Q Cost of sales

	Q Consumption of diesel 
fuel, propane, natural 
gas, and electricity

	Q Non-US dollar 
expenditures

Impacted by

	Q Prices of gold, silver  

and copper

	Q Prices of diesel fuel, 
propane, natural gas, 
and electricity

	Q Currency exchange 

rates – US dollar versus 
A$, ARS, C$, CLP, DOP, 
EUR, PGK, TZS, XOF, 
ZAR and ZMW

	Q General and administration, 
exploration and evaluation 
costs

	Q Currency exchange rates – 
US dollar versus A$, ARS, 
C$, CLP, DOP, GBP, PGK, 
TZS, XOF, ZAR, and ZMW

	Q Capital expenditures

	Q Non-US dollar capital 

	Q Currency exchange 

expenditures

rates – US dollar versus 
A$, ARS, C$, CLP, DOP, 
EUR, GBP, PGK, XOF, 
ZAR, and ZMW

	Q Consumption of steel

	Q Price of steel

	Q Interest earned on cash 

	Q US dollar interest rates

and equivalents

	Q Interest paid on fixed-rate 

	Q US dollar interest rates

borrowings

188

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
26.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair  value  is  the  price  that  would  be  received  to  sell  an  asset  or 
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market 
participants  at  the  measurement  date.  The  fair  value  hierarchy 
establishes three levels to classify the inputs to valuation techniques 
used  to  measure  fair  value.  Level  1  inputs  are  quoted  prices 
(unadjusted)  in  active  markets  for  identical  assets  or  liabilities. 
Level  2  inputs  are  quoted  prices  in  markets  that  are  not  active, 
quoted  prices  for  similar  assets  or  liabilities  in  active  markets, 

inputs  other  than  quoted  prices  that  are  observable  for  the  asset 
or  liability  (for  example,  interest  rate  and  yield  curves  observable 
at commonly quoted intervals, forward pricing curves used to value 
currency  and  commodity  contracts  and  volatility  measurements 
used to value option contracts), or inputs that are derived principally 
from  or  corroborated  by  observable  market  data  or  other  means. 
Level  3  inputs  are  unobservable  (supported  by  little  or  no  market 
activity). The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1  
inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

a)  Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

At December 31, 2021

Cash and equivalents
Other investments1
Derivatives

Receivables from provisional copper and gold sales

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS 

At December 31, 2020

Cash and equivalents
Other investments1
Derivatives

Receivables from provisional copper and gold sales

Quoted Prices in 
Active Markets for 
Identical Assets 
(Level 1)

Significant  
Other Observable 
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs  
(Level 3)

$  5,280  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

414

–

–

–

53

242

–

–

–

Aggregate  
Fair Value

$  5,280

414

53

242

$  5,694  

$ 

295  

$ 

–  

$  5,989

Quoted Prices in 
Active Markets for 
Identical Assets 
(Level 1)

Significant  
Other Observable 
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs  
(Level 3)

$  5,188  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

428

–

–

–

40

265

–

–

–

Aggregate  
Fair Value

$  5,188

428

40

265

$  5,616  

$ 

305  

$ 

–  

$  5,921

1 Includes equity investments in other mining companies. 

b)  Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities

At December 31

Financial assets
  Other assets1
  Other investments2
  Derivative assets3

Financial liabilities
  Debt4
  Other liabilities

2021

2020

Carrying 
amount

Estimated 
fair value

Carrying 
amount

Estimated 
fair value

$ 

382  

$ 

414

53

$ 

849  

$ 

382  
414

53
849  

$ 

571  

$ 

428

40

571

428

40

$  1,039  

$  1,039

$  5,150  

$  6,928  

$  5,155  

$  7,288

473

473

382

382

$  5,623  

$  7,401  

$  5,537  

$  7,670

1  Includes restricted cash and amounts due from our partners.
2  Includes equity investments in other mining companies. Recorded at fair value. Quoted market prices are used to determine fair value.
3  Primarily consists of contingency consideration received as part of the sale of Massawa and Lagunas Norte. 
4   Debt is generally recorded at amortized cost except for obligations that are designated in a fair-value hedge relationship, in which case the carrying amount is 
adjusted for changes in fair value of the hedging instrument in periods when a hedge relationship exists. The fair value of debt is primarily determined using 
quoted market prices. Balance includes both current and long-term portions of debt.

We do not offset financial assets with financial liabilities.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 189

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c)   Assets Measured at Fair Value on a  

Non-Recurring Basis Valuation Techniques

Derivative Instruments
The fair value of derivative instruments is determined using either 
present  value  techniques  or  option  pricing  models  that  utilize  a 
variety of inputs that are a combination of quoted prices and market-
corroborated  inputs.  The  fair  value  of  all  our  derivative  contracts 
includes  an  adjustment  for  credit  risk.  For  counterparties  in  a  net 
asset position, credit risk is based upon the observed credit default 
swap  spread  for  each  particular  counterparty,  as  appropriate.  For 
counterparties  in  a  net  liability  position,  credit  risk  is  based  upon 
Barrick’s observed credit default swap (“CDS”) spread. The fair value 
of US dollar interest rate and currency swap contracts is determined 
by discounting contracted cash flows using a discount rate derived 
from observed LIBOR and swap rate curves and credit default swap 
rates. In the case of currency contracts, we convert non-US dollar 
cash  flows  into  US  dollars  using  an  exchange  rate  derived  from 
currency swap curves and CDS rates. The fair value of commodity 
forward  contracts  is  determined  by  discounting  contractual  cash 
flows using a discount rate derived from observed LIBOR and swap 
rate  curves  and  CDS  rates.  Contractual  cash  flows  are  calculated 
using a forward pricing curve derived from observed forward prices 
for  each  commodity.  Derivative  instruments  are  classified  within 
Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Receivables from Provisional Copper and Gold Sales
The  fair  value  of  receivables  arising  from  copper  and  gold  sales 
contracts that contain provisional pricing mechanisms is determined 
using the appropriate quoted forward price from the exchange that 
is the principal active market for the particular metal. As such, these 
receivables,  which meet the definition of an embedded derivative, 
are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other Long-Term Assets
The fair value of property, plant and equipment, goodwill, intangibles 
and other assets is determined primarily using an income approach 
based on unobservable cash flows and a market multiples approach 
where applicable, and as a result is classified within Level 3 of the 
fair value hierarchy. Refer to note 21 for disclosure of inputs used to 
develop these measures.

27.  PROVISIONS
a)  Provisions

As at December 31

2021

2020

Environmental rehabilitation (“PER”)

$  2,559  

$  2,950

Post-retirement benefits

Share-based payments
Other employee benefits

Other

48

17
42

102

43

24
25

97

$  2,768  

$  3,139

b)  Environmental Rehabilitation

At January 1

PERs divested during the year

Closed Sites

Impact of revisions to expected cash 
  flows recorded in earnings

  Settlements

  Cash payments

  Settlement gains

  Accretion

Operating Sites

  PER revisions in the year

  Settlements

  Cash payments

  Settlement gains

  Accretion
At December 31
Current portion (note 24)

2021

2020

$  3,081  
(265)

$  3,078

(6)

44

(89)

(6)

18

(42)

(44)

(2)

30

$  2,725  
(166)
$  2,559  

79

(67)

(3)

16

1

(39)

(3)

25
$  3,081
(131)

$  2,950

The  eventual  settlement  of  substantially  all  PERs  estimated  is 
expected to take place between 2022 and 2061.

The  total  PER  has  decreased  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2021  by 
$97  million  primarily  due  to  spending  incurred  during  the  quarter, 
combined with the divestment of our Lone Tree mine and changes 
in  cost  estimates  at  our  Pascua-Lama,  Lumwana  and  Buzwagi 
properties.  For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  our  PER 
balance decreased by $356 million primarily due to the divestment 
of our Lagunas Norte mine and spending incurred during the year.  
A  1%  increase  in  the  discount  rate  would  result  in  a  decrease  in 
PER by $315 million and a 1% decrease in the discount rate would 
result in a decrease in PER by $nil (as the discount rate used was 
0%), while holding the other assumptions constant.

28.  FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Our  financial  instruments  are  comprised  of  financial  liabilities 
and  financial  assets.  Our  principal  financial  liabilities,  other  than 
derivatives, comprise accounts payable and debt. The main purpose 
of  these  financial  instruments  is  to  manage  short-term  cash  flow 
and raise funds for our capital expenditure program. Our principal 
financial  assets,  other  than  derivative  instruments,  are  cash  and 
equivalents and accounts receivable, which arise directly from our 
operations.  In  the  normal  course  of  business,  we  use  derivative 
instruments to mitigate exposure to various financial risks.

We  manage  our  exposure  to  key  financial  risks  in  accordance 
with our financial risk management policy. The objective of the policy 
is  to  support  the  delivery  of  our  financial  targets  while  protecting 
future financial security. The main risks that could adversely affect 
our financial assets, liabilities or future cash flows are as follows:
 Market risk, including commodity price risk, foreign currency 
a. 
and interest rate risk;

b.  Credit risk;
c.  Liquidity risk; and
d.  Capital risk management.

Management designs strategies for managing each of these risks, 
which  are  summarized  below.  Our  senior  management  oversees 
the management of financial risks. Our senior management ensures 
that our financial risk-taking activities are governed by policies and 
procedures  and  that  financial  risks  are  identified,  measured  and 
managed in accordance with our policies and our risk appetite. All 
derivative  activities  for  risk  management  purposes  are  carried  out 
by the appropriate personnel.

190

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a)  Market Risk
Market  risk  is  the  risk  that  changes  in  market  factors,  such  as 
commodity  prices,  foreign  exchange  rates  or  interest  rates,  will 
affect the value of our financial instruments. We manage market risk 
by either accepting it or mitigating it through the use of derivatives 
and other economic hedging strategies.

Commodity Price Risk
Gold and Copper
We  sell  our  gold  and  copper  production  in  the  world  market.  The 
market  prices  of  gold  and  copper  are  the  primary  drivers  of  our 
profitability  and  ability  to  generate  both  operating  and  free  cash 
flow.  Our  corporate  treasury  group  implements  hedging  strategies 
on an opportunistic basis to protect us from downside price risk on 
our gold and copper production. We did not enter into any positions 
during  the  year.  During  2020,  we  sold  57  thousand  ounces  of 
producer gold collars. We do not have any positions outstanding as 
at December 31, 2021. Our gold and copper production is subject 
to market prices.

Fuel
We  consume  diesel  fuel  and  natural  gas  to  run  our  operations. 
Diesel fuel is refined from crude oil and is therefore subject to the 
same  price  volatility  affecting  crude  oil  prices. Therefore,  volatility 
in crude oil and natural gas prices have a direct and indirect impact 
on our production costs.

Foreign Currency Risk
The  functional  and  reporting  currency  for  all  of  our  operating 
segments  is  the  US  dollar  and  we  report  our  results  using  the  
US  dollar.  The  majority  of  our  operating  and  capital  expenditures 
are  denominated  and  settled  in  US  dollars.  We  have  exposure  to 
the Argentine  peso  through  operating  costs  at  our  Veladero  mine, 
and  peso  denominated  VAT  receivable  balances.  In  addition,  we 
have  exposure  to  the  Canadian  and  Australian  dollars,  Chilean 
peso,  Papua  New  Guinea  kina,  Peruvian  sol,  Zambian  kwacha, 
Tanzanian shilling, Dominican peso, West African CFA franc, Euro, 
South African rand, and British pound through mine operating and 
capital costs. Consequently, fluctuations in the US dollar exchange 
rate against these currencies increase the volatility of cost of sales, 
general  and  administrative  costs  and  overall  net  earnings,  when 
translated into US dollars.

Interest Rate Risk
Interest  rate  risk  refers  to  the  risk  that  the  value  of  a  financial 
instrument  or  cash  flows  associated  with  the  instruments  will 
fluctuate  due  to  changes  in  market  interest  rates.  Currently,  our 
interest  rate  exposure  mainly  relates  to  interest  receipts  on  our 
cash  balances  ($5.3  billion  at  the  end  of  the  year);  the  mark-to-
market value of derivative instruments; and to the interest payments 
on our variable-rate debt ($0.1 billion at December 31, 2021).

The  effect  on  net  earnings  and  equity  of  a  1%  change  in  
the  interest  rate  of  our  financial  assets  and  liabilities  as  at  
December 31, 2021 is approximately $37 million (2020: $30 million).

b)  Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill its performance 
obligations  under  the  terms  of  a  financial  instrument.  Credit  risk 
arises  from  cash  and  equivalents,  trade  and  other  receivables  as 
well as derivative assets. For cash and equivalents and trade and 
other receivables, credit risk exposure equals the carrying amount 

on  the  balance  sheet,  net  of  any  overdraft  positions.  To  mitigate 
our inherent exposure to credit risk we maintain policies to limit the 
concentration  of  credit  risk,  review  counterparty  creditworthiness 
on  a  monthly  basis,  and  ensure  liquidity  of  available  funds.  We 
also  invest  our  excess  cash  and  equivalents  in  highly  rated 
financial institutions, primarily within the United States and Canada. 
Furthermore, we sell our gold and copper production into the world 
market  and  to  financial  institutions  and  private  customers  with 
strong  credit  ratings.  Historically,  customer  defaults  have  not  had 
a significant impact on our operating results or financial position.

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting 
date is the carrying value of each of the financial assets disclosed 
as follows:

As at December 31

Cash and equivalents

Accounts receivable

Derivative assets

2021

2020

$  5,280  

$  5,188

623

53

558

40

$  5,956  

$  5,786

c)  Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of loss from not having access to sufficient 
funds  to  meet  both  expected  and  unexpected  cash  demands.  We 
manage our exposure to liquidity risk by maintaining cash reserves, 
access to undrawn credit facilities and access to public debt markets, 
by  staggering  the  maturities  of  outstanding  debt  instruments  to 
mitigate refinancing risk and by monitoring of forecasted and actual 
cash  flows.  Details  of  the  undrawn  credit  facility  are  included  in 
note 25.

Our  capital  structure  comprises  a  mix  of  debt,  non-controlling 
interest  and  shareholders’  equity.  As  at  December  31,  2021,  our 
total  debt  was  $5.2  billion  (debt  net  of  cash  and  equivalents  was 
$(130) million) compared to total debt as at December 31, 2020 of 
$5.2 billion (debt net of cash and equivalents was $(33) million).

Our  operating  cash  flow  is  dependent  on  the  ability  of  our 
operations to deliver projected future cash flows. The market prices 
of  gold,  and  to  a  lesser  extent  copper,  are  the  primary  drivers 
of  our  operating  cash  flow.  Other  options  to  enhance  liquidity 
include  further  portfolio  optimization  and  the  creation  of  new  joint 
ventures  and  partnerships;  issuance  of  equity  securities  in  the 
public  markets  or  to  private  investors,  which  could  be  undertaken 
for  liquidity  enhancement  and/or  in  connection  with  establishing  a 
strategic  partnership;  issuance  of  long-term  debt  securities  in  the 
public markets or to private investors (Moody’s and S&P currently 
rate  Barrick’s  outstanding  long-term  debt  as  investment  grade, 
with  ratings  of  Baa1  and  BBB,  respectively);  and  drawing  on  the 
$3.0  billion  available  under  our  undrawn  credit  facility  (subject  to 
compliance with covenants and the making of certain representations 
and  warranties,  this  facility  is  available  for  drawdown  as  a  source 
of  financing).  The  key  financial  covenant  in  the  Credit  Facility 
(undrawn as at December 31, 2021) requires Barrick to maintain a 
net debt to total capitalization ratio, as defined in the agreement, of 
0.60:1  or  lower  (Barrick’s  net  debt  to  total  capitalization  ratio  was 
0.00:1 as at December 31, 2021).

The  following  table  outlines  the  expected  maturity  of  our 
significant  financial  assets  and  liabilities  into  relevant  maturity 
groupings  based  on  the  remaining  period  from  the  balance  
sheet  date  to  the  contractual  maturity  date.  As  the  amounts 
presented in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows, 
these  balances  may  not  agree  with  the  amounts  disclosed  in  the 
balance sheet.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 191

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
As at December 31, 2021 
(in $ millions)

Cash and equivalents

Accounts receivable

Derivative assets

Trade and other payables

Debt

Other liabilities

As at December 31, 2020 
(in $ millions)

Cash and equivalents

Accounts receivable

Derivative assets

Trade and other payables

Debt

Other liabilities

Less than 1 year

1 to 3 years 

3 to 5 years 

Over 5 years 

$ 5,280  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

623

–

1,448

15

30

–

53

–

17

196

–

–

–

67

92

–

–

–

5,077

155

Less than 1 year

1 to 3 years 

3 to 5 years 

Over 5 years 

$ 5,188  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

$ 

–  

558

–

1,458

20

31

–

40

–

16

72

–

–

–

20

36

–

–

–

5,125

243

Total 

$ 5,280

623

53

1,448

5,176

473

Total 

$ 5,188

558

40

1,458

5,181

382

d)  Capital Risk Management
Our  objective  when  managing  capital  is  to  provide  value  for 
shareholders  by  maintaining  an  optimal  short-term  and  long-term 
capital structure in order to reduce the overall cost of capital while 
preserving  our  ability  to  continue  as  a  going  concern.  Our  capital 
management  objectives  are  to  safeguard  our  ability  to  support 
our  operating  requirements  on  an  ongoing  basis,  continue  the 
development and exploration of our mineral properties and support 
any  expansion  plans.  Our  objectives  are  also  to  ensure  that  we 
maintain a strong balance sheet and optimize the use of debt and 
equity  to  support  our  business  and  provide  financial  flexibility  in 
order  to  maximize  shareholder  value.  We  define  capital  as  total 
debt less cash and equivalents and it is managed by management 
subject  to  approved  policies  and  limits  by  the  Board  of  Directors. 
We have no significant financial covenants or capital requirements 
with our lenders or other parties other than what is discussed under 
liquidity risk in note 28c.

29.  OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

As at December 31

2021

2020

Deposit on Pascua-Lama silver  
  sale agreement
Deposit on Pueblo Viejo gold and silver   
  streaming agreement1
Long-term income tax payable

GoT shareholder loan

Pueblo Viejo JV partner shareholder loan

Provision for offsite remediation

Other

$ 

154  

$ 

149

438

267

150

164

52

76

447
321

167

42

50

92

$  1,301  

$  1,268

1   Revenues  of  $44  million  were  recognized  in  2021  (2020:  $53  million) 
through the draw-down of our streaming liabilities relating to a contract in 
place at Pueblo Viejo.

GoT Shareholder Loan
On January 24, 2020, Barrick formalized the establishment of a joint 
venture  between  Barrick  and  the  GoT.  Effective  January  1,  2020, 
the GoT received a 16% interest in the shareholder loans owed by 
Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi, of which $167 million was payable to the 
GoT. During 2021, $16 million was repaid. 

Pueblo Viejo Shareholder Loan
In  November  2020,  Pueblo  Viejo  entered  into  a  $1.3  billion  loan 
facility  agreement  with  its  shareholders  (the  “PV  Shareholder 
Loan”)  to  provide  long-term  financing  to  expand  the  mine.  The 
shareholders  will  lend  funds  pro  rata  in  accordance  with  their 
shareholding in Pueblo Viejo. The PV Shareholder Loan is broken 
up  into  two  facilities:  $0.8  billion  of  funds  that  can  be  drawn  on  a 
pro  rata  basis  until  June  30,  2022  (“Facility  I”)  and  $0.5  billion  of 
funds  that  can  be  drawn  on  a  pro  rata  basis  until  June  30,  2025 
(“Facility  II”). Amortized  repayments  for  Facility  I  are  due  to  begin 
twice yearly on the scheduled repayment dates after the earlier of 
full  drawdown  of  Facility  I  or  June  30,  2022,  with  a  final  maturity 
date of February 28, 2032. Amortized repayments for Facility II are 
due to begin twice yearly on the scheduled repayment dates after 
the  earlier  of  full  drawdown  of  Facility  II  or  June  30,  2025,  with  a 
final maturity date of February 28, 2035. The interest rate on drawn 
amounts  is  LIBOR  plus  400  basis  points.  During  2021  and  2020, 
$327 million and $104 million, respectively, were drawn on Facility I,  
including $131 million and $42 million, respectively, from Barrick’s 
Pueblo Viejo JV partner.

Pascua-Lama Silver Sale Agreement
Our  silver  sale  agreement  with  Wheaton  requires  us  to  deliver  
25  percent  of  the  life  of  mine  silver  production  from  the  Pascua-
Lama  project  once  it  is  constructed  and  required  delivery  of  
100  percent  of  silver  production  from  the  Lagunas  Norte,  Pierina 
and Veladero mines until March 31, 2018. In return, we were entitled 
to an upfront cash payment of $625 million payable over three years 
from  the  date  of  the  agreement,  as  well  as  ongoing  payments  in 
cash of the lesser of $3.90 (subject to an annual inflation adjustment 
of 1 percent starting three years after project completion at Pascua-
Lama)  and  the  prevailing  market  price  for  each  ounce  of  silver 

192

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
30.  DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
Recognition and Measurement
We  record  deferred  income  tax  assets  and  liabilities  where 
temporary  differences  exist  between  the  carrying  amounts  of 
assets  and  liabilities  in  our  balance  sheet  and  their  tax  bases. 
The  measurement  and  recognition  of  deferred  income  tax  assets 
and  liabilities  takes  into  account:  substantively  enacted  rates  that 
will  apply  when  temporary  differences  reverse;  interpretations  of 
relevant  tax  legislation;  estimates  of  the  tax  bases  of  assets  and 
liabilities;  and  the  deductibility  of  expenditures  for  income  tax 
purposes. In addition, the measurement and recognition of deferred 
tax assets takes into account tax planning strategies. We recognize 
the  effect  of  changes  in  our  assessment  of  these  estimates  and 
factors when they occur. Changes in deferred income tax assets and 
liabilities  are  allocated  between  net  income,  other  comprehensive 
income, equity and goodwill based on the source of the change.

Current income taxes of $66 million have been provided in the 
year  on  the  undistributed  earnings  of  certain  foreign  subsidiaries. 
Deferred income taxes have not been provided on the undistributed 
earnings  of  all  other  foreign  subsidiaries  for  which  we  are  able  to 
control  the  timing  of  the  remittance,  and  it  is  probable  that  there 
will be no remittance in the foreseeable future. These undistributed 
earnings amounted to $18,016 million as at December 31, 2021.

SOURCES OF DEFERRED INCOME TAX  
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

As at December 31

Deferred tax assets

Tax loss carry forwards

Tax credits

Environmental rehabilitation
Post-retirement benefit obligations  
  and other employee benefits

Other working capital

Other

Deferred tax liabilities

Property, plant and equipment

Inventory

Accrued interest payable

Classification:

Non-current assets 

Non-current liabilities

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

330  
10

262

30

68

5
705  

$ 

456

13

358

30

70

3

$ 

930

(3,556)

(416)

3

(3,375)

(463)

(28)

$  (3,264) 

$  (2,936)

$ 

29  
(3,293)
$  (3,264) 

$ 

98

(3,034)

$  (2,936)

delivered  under  the  agreement. An  imputed  interest  expense  was 
recorded  on  the  liability  at  the  rate  implicit  in  the  agreement.  The 
liability plus imputed interest was amortized based on the difference 
between  the  effective  contract  price  for  silver  and  the  amount  of 
the ongoing cash payment per ounce of silver delivered under the 
agreement.  The  completion  date  guarantee  under  the  silver  sale 
agreement  for  Pascua-Lama  was  originally  December  31,  2015 
but  was  subsequently  extended  to  June  30,  2020.  Per  the  terms 
of the amended silver purchase agreement, if the requirements of 
the completion guarantee were not satisfied by June 30, 2020, then 
Wheaton had the right to terminate the agreement within 90 days of 
that date, in which case, they would have been entitled to the return 
of the upfront consideration paid less credit for silver delivered up 
to the date of that event.

liability  was  remeasured 

Given  that,  as  of  September  28,  2020,  Wheaton  had  not 
exercised  its  termination  right,  a  residual  liability  of  $253  million 
remains due on September 1, 2039 (assuming no future deliveries 
to  
are  made).  This  residual  cash 
$148  million  as  at  September  30,  2020,  which  is  the  present 
value  of  the  liability  due  in  2039  discounted  at  a  rate  estimated 
for comparable liabilities, including Barrick’s outstanding debt. This 
remeasurement resulted in a gain of $104 million recorded in Other 
Income (refer to note 9) for the year ended December 31, 2020. The 
liability of $148 million was reclassified from other current liabilities 
to  other  non-current  liabilities  as  at  September  30,  2020  and  will 
be measured at amortized cost in future periods. The liability had a 
balance of $154 million as at December 31, 2021.

Pueblo Viejo Gold and Silver Streaming Agreement
On  September  29,  2015,  we  closed  a  gold  and  silver  streaming 
transaction  with  Royal  Gold,  Inc.  (“Royal  Gold”)  for  production 
linked  to  Barrick’s  60  percent  interest  in  the  Pueblo  Viejo  mine. 
Royal Gold made an upfront cash payment of $610 million and will 
continue to make cash payments for gold and silver delivered under 
the agreement. The $610 million upfront payment is not repayable 
and Barrick is obligated to deliver gold and silver based on Pueblo 
Viejo’s production. We have accounted for the upfront payment as 
deferred  revenue  and  will  recognize  it  in  earnings,  along  with  the 
ongoing cash payments, as the gold and silver is delivered to Royal 
Gold. We will also be recording accretion expense on the deferred 
revenue balance as the time value of the upfront deposit represents 
a significant component of the transaction.

Under  the  terms  of  the  agreement,  Barrick  will  sell  gold  and 

silver to Royal Gold equivalent to:

	Q 7.5 percent of Barrick’s interest in the gold produced at Pueblo 
Viejo  until  990,000  ounces  of  gold  have  been  delivered,  and 
3.75 percent thereafter.

	Q 75  percent  of  Barrick’s  interest  in  the  silver  produced  at  
Pueblo Viejo until 50 million ounces have been delivered, and 
37.5  percent  thereafter.  Silver  will  be  delivered  based  on  a  
fixed recovery rate of 70 percent. Silver above this recovery rate 
is not subject to the stream.

Barrick  will  receive  ongoing  cash  payments  from  Royal  Gold 
equivalent  to  30  percent  of  the  prevailing  spot  prices  for  the  first 
550,000 ounces of gold and 23.1 million ounces of silver delivered. 
Thereafter  payments  will  double  to  60  percent  of  prevailing  spot 
prices  for  each  subsequent  ounce  of  gold  and  silver  delivered. 
Ongoing cash payments to Barrick are tied to prevailing spot prices 
rather  than  fixed  in  advance,  maintaining  exposure  to  higher  gold 
and silver prices in the future.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 193

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPIRY DATES OF TAX LOSSES

Non-capital tax losses1
Barbados

Canada

Chile

Saudi Arabia

Tanzania

United Kingdom

Zambia

Others

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026+

$ 

97  

$ 

399  

$ 

213  

$ 

220  

$ 

138  

$ 

–

–

–

–

–

32

–

–

–

–

–

–

2

–

–

–

–

–

–

2

–

–

–

–

–

–

1

–

2,146

–

–

–

–

11

59

No  
expiry  
date

Total

–  

–

$  1,067

2,146

894

349

1,296

190

–

45

894

349

1,296

190

48

104

$ 

129  

$ 

401  

$ 

215  

$ 

221  

$  2,354  

$  2,774  

$  6,094

1  Represents the gross amount of tax loss carry forwards translated at closing exchange rates at December 31, 2021.

The  non-capital  tax  losses  include  $4,995  million  of  losses  which 
are  not  recognized  in  deferred  tax  assets.  Of  these,  $99  million 
expire in  2022,  $401 million expire in 2023, $214 million expire in 
2024, $221 million expire in 2025, $2,287 million expire in 2026 or 
later, and $1,772 million have no expiry date.

Deferred tax assets not recognized relate to: non-capital loss carry 
forwards of $1,048 million (2020: $1,168 million), capital loss carry 
forwards  with  no  expiry  date  of  $321  million  (2020:  $323  million), 
and  other  deductible  temporary  differences  with  no  expiry  date  of 
$1,414 million (2020: $1,638 million).

SOURCE OF CHANGES IN DEFERRED TAX BALANCES

Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets
We  recognize  deferred  tax  assets  taking  into  account  the  effects 
of local tax law. Deferred tax assets are fully recognized when we 
conclude that sufficient positive evidence exists to demonstrate that 
it  is  probable  that  a  deferred  tax  asset  will  be  realized.  The  main 
factors considered are:

	Q Historic and expected future levels of taxable income;
	Q Tax plans that affect whether tax assets can be realized; and
	Q The nature, amount and expected timing of reversal of taxable 

temporary differences.

For the years ended December 31

Temporary differences

Property, plant and equipment

Environmental rehabilitation

Tax loss carry forwards

AMT and other tax credits

Inventory

Other

Levels of future income are mainly affected by: market gold, copper 
and silver prices; forecasted future costs and expenses to produce 
gold and copper; quantities of proven and probable gold and copper 
reserves;  market  interest  rates;  and  foreign  currency  exchange 
rates.  If  these  factors  or  other  circumstances  change,  we  record 
an  adjustment  to  the  recognition  of  deferred  tax  assets  to  reflect 
our latest assessment of the amount of deferred tax assets that is 
probable will be realized..

Intraperiod allocation to:
Income from continuing operations 
  before income taxes

Income Tax Payable

Other comprehensive (income) loss

Other

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS NOT RECOGNIZED

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

(181) 
(97)

(127)

(3)

48

32
(328) 

(345) 
(2)

19

–
(328) 

$ 

(112)

29

(54)

(14)

81

(10)

(80)

$ 

$ 

(151)

65

(6)

12

$ 

(80)

As at December 31

Argentina

Australia

Barbados

Canada

Chile

Côte d’Ivoire

Mali

Peru

Saudi Arabia

Tanzania

United Kingdom

Zambia

INCOME TAX RELATED CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

At January 1
Net additions based on uncertain tax  
  positions related to prior years

Reductions for tax positions of prior years
At December 311

2021

2020

$ 

266  

$ 

327

19

(28)
257  

39

(100)

$ 

266

$ 

1   If  reversed,  the  total  amount  of  $257  million  would  be  recognized  as  a 
benefit  to  income  taxes  on  the  income  statement,  and  therefore  would 
impact the reported effective tax rate.

$ 

$ 

2021

118  
302

27

966

1,059

6

11

79

71

105

36

3

2020

105

298

10

1,127

1,037

6

9

281

70

110

36

40

$  2,783  

$  3,129

194

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAX YEARS STILL UNDER EXAMINATION

Argentina 

Australia

Canada

Chile

Côte d'Ivoire 

Democratic Republic of Congo

Dominican Republic 

Mali

Papua New Guinea 

Peru 

Saudi Arabia

Tanzania 

United States 

Zambia 

2010–2011, 2015–2021

2017–2021

2015–2021

2015–2021

2020–2021

2019–2021

2015–2021

2017–2021

2006–2021

2015–2021

2020–2021

2018–2021

2021

2018–2021

31.  CAPITAL STOCK
Authorized Capital Stock
Our  authorized  capital  stock  is  composed  of  an  unlimited  number 
of  common  shares  (issued  1,779,331,037  common  shares  as  at 
December 31, 2021). Our common shares have no par value.

Dividends
In  2021,  we  declared  and  paid  dividends  in  US  dollars  totaling  
$634 million (2020: $547 million). 

The Company’s dividend reinvestment plan resulted in $5 million  

(2020: $4 million) reinvested into the Company.

Return of Capital
At  the Annual  and  Special  Meeting  on  May  4,  2021,  shareholders 
approved a $750 million return of capital distribution. This distribution 
was derived from a portion of the proceeds from the divestiture of 
Kalgoorlie  Consolidated  Gold  Mines  in  November  2019  and  from 
other  recent  dispositions  made  by  Barrick  and  its  affiliates  in  line 
with our strategy of focusing on our core assets. The total return of 
capital distribution was paid in three equal tranches of $250 million 
on June 15, 2021, September 15, 2021 and December 15, 2021.

Share Buyback Program
At the February 15, 2022 meeting, the Board of Directors authorized 
a share buyback program for the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of 
the Company’s outstanding common shares over the next 12 months. 
The actual number of common shares that may be purchased, 
if  any,  and  the  timing  of  any  such  purchases,  will  be  determined 
by Barrick based on a number of factors, including the Company’s 
financial  performance,  the  availability  of  cash  flows,  and  the 
consideration  of  other  uses  of  cash,  including  capital  investment 
opportunities, returns to shareholders, and debt reduction.

The  repurchase  program  does  not  obligate  the  Company 
to  acquire  any  particular  number  of  common  shares,  and  the 
repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time 
at the Company’s discretion.

32.  NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
a)  Non-Controlling Interests (“NCI”) Continuity

NCI in subsidiary at December 31, 2021

38.5%

40%

16%

20%

10.3%

Various

Nevada 
Gold Mines

Pueblo 
Viejo

Tanzania 
Mines1

Loulo-
Gounkoto

Tongon

Other

Total

At January 1, 2020

Share of income (loss)

Cash contributed
Increase in non-controlling interest2
Disbursements

At December 31, 2020

Share of income

Cash contributed
Decrease in non-controlling interest3
Disbursements

$  6,039  

$  1,424  

$ 

–  

$ 

901  

$ 

47  

$ 

(16) 

$  8,395

965

–

–

196

–

–

(1,026)

(427)

57

–

251

(45)

68

–

–

(36)

9

–

–

(17)

$  5,978  

$  1,193  

$ 

263  

$ 

933  

$ 

39  

$ 

980

–

(49)

(848)

174

–

–

(178)

35

–

–

–

71

–

–

(51)

6

–

–

(16)

(5)

11

–

(27)

(37) 

–

12

(37)

(18)

1,290

11

251

(1,578)

$  8,369

1,266

12

(86)

(1,111)

At December 31, 2021

$  6,061  

$  1,189  

$ 

298  

$ 

953  

$ 

29  

$ 

(80) 

$  8,450

1  Tanzania mines consist of North Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi. 
2  Refer to note 21 for further details. 
3  Refer to note 4 for further details. 

b)  Summarized Financial Information on Subsidiaries with Material Non-Controlling Interests

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS

As at December 31

Current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Nevada Gold Mines

Pueblo Viejo 

Tanzania Mines

Loulo-Gounkoto

Tongon

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

  $  3,351   $  6,111   $ 

394   $ 

491   $ 

637   $ 

530   $ 

444   $ 

347   $ 

205   $ 

Non-current assets

13,750

13,708

4,724

4,342

1,798

1,758

4,712

4,660

192

  $ 17,101   $ 19,819   $  5,118   $  4,833   $  2,435   $  2,288   $  5,156   $  5,007   $ 

397   $ 

Total liabilities

  $  1,805   $  1,902   $  1,882   $  1,293   $  1,452   $  1,589   $ 

599   $ 

135   $ 

194

561

1,244

636

1,266

633

1,249

240

1,053

926

526

1,024

565

141

575
716   $ 

32

567

76

59

288

265

553

118

76

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 195

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the years ended 
December 31

Revenue
Income from continuing  
  operations after tax
Other comprehensive  

income

Total comprehensive  

income

Dividends paid to NCI2

Nevada Gold Mines

Pueblo Viejo 

Tanzania Mines1

Loulo-Gounkoto

Tongon

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

  $  6,135   $  6,299   $  1,514   $  1,613   $ 

993   $  1,213   $  1,249   $  1,208   $ 

368   $ 

507

2,246

2,439

9

–

361

–

418

–

284

–

653

–

322

–

339

–

52

–

  $  2,255   $  2,439   $ 
848   $  1,026   $ 
  $ 

361   $ 
48   $ 

418   $ 
6   $ 

284   $ 
–   $ 

653   $ 
45   $ 

322   $ 
51   $ 

339   $ 
36   $ 

52   $ 
20   $ 

83

–

83

–

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended 
December 31

Net cash provided by  
  operating activities
Net cash used in  

investing activities

Net cash used in  
  financing activities
Net increase (decrease)  
in cash and cash   

Nevada Gold Mines

Pueblo Viejo 

Tanzania Mines1

Loulo-Gounkoto

Tongon3

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

  $  3,035   $  3,518   $ 

541   $ 

820   $ 

373   $ 

609   $ 

605   $ 

497   $ 

61   $ 

252

(962)

(971)

(2,208)

(2,668)

(522)

(101)

(223)

(651)

(178)

(100)

(181)

(270)

(297)

(254)

(226)

(189)

(17)

(8)

(143)

(119)

  equivalents

  $ 

(135)  $ 

(121)  $ 

(82)  $ 

(54)  $ 

95   $ 

158   $ 

54   $ 

82   $ 

(99)  $ 

125

1  Tanzania mines consist of North Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi.
2  Includes partner distributions.
3  2020 figures have been updated to present a $117 million reclassification between operating and financing activities related to dividends paid. 

33.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The  Company’s  related  parties  include  its  subsidiaries,  joint 
operations, joint ventures and key management personnel. During its 
normal course of operations, the Company enters into transactions 
with  its  related  parties  for  goods  and  services.  Transactions 
between  the  Company  and  its  subsidiaries  and  joint  operations, 
which  are  related  parties  of  the  Company,  have  been  eliminated 
on  consolidation  and  are  not  disclosed  in  this  note.  There  were 
no  other  material  related  party  transactions  reported  in  the  year.

Remuneration of Key Management Personnel
Key  management  personnel  include  the  members  of  the  Board  of 
Directors and the executive leadership team. Compensation for key 
management personnel (including Directors) was as follows:

34.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
a)   Restricted Share Units (RSUs) and Deferred 

Share Units (DSUs)

Compensation  expense  for  RSUs  was  a  $31  million  charge 
to  earnings  in  2021  (2020:  $45  million)  and  is  presented  as  a 
component  of  general  and  administrative  expenses  and  cost 
of  sales,  consistent  with  the  classification  of  other  elements  of 
compensation expense for those employees who had RSUs.

Compensation  expense  for  RSUs  incorporates  an  expected 
forfeiture  rate.  The  expected  forfeiture  rate  is  estimated  based 
on  historical  forfeiture  rates  and  expectations  of  future  forfeiture 
rates. We make adjustments if the actual forfeiture rate differs from 
the  expected  rate.  At  December  31,  2021,  the  weighted  average 
remaining contractual life of RSUs was 0.75 years (2020: 0.83 years).

For the years ended December 31
Salaries and short-term employee benefits1 
Post-employment benefits2
Share-based payments and other3

2021

2020

$ 

$ 

36  
6

25
67  

$ 

$ 

33

4

45

82

1  Includes  annual  salary  and  annual  short-term  incentives/other  bonuses 

earned in the year.

2  Represents Company contributions to retirement savings plans.
3  Relates to DSU, RSU, and PGSU grants and other compensation.

DSU AND RSU ACTIVITY  
(NUMBER OF UNITS IN THOUSANDS)

DSUs

Fair  
value

RSUs

Fair  
value

At January 1, 2020

476   $ 

8.8

3,110   $  41.5

Settled for cash

Forfeited

Granted

Credits for dividends

Change in value

–

–

85

–

–

–

–

2.0

–

2.0

(2,136)

(313)

1,923

39

–

(47.3)

(5.7)

35.2

0.9

14.0

At December 31, 2020

561   $  12.8

2,623   $  38.6

Settled for cash

Granted

Credits for dividends

Change in value

–

117

–

–

–

2.2

–

(2.4)

(1,435)

1,300

30

–

(36.2)

26.4

0.6

1.6

At December 31, 2021

678   $  12.6

2,518   $  31.0

196

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
b)  Performance Granted Share Units (PGSUs)
In 2014, Barrick launched a PGSU plan. Under this plan, selected 
employees  are  granted  PGSUs,  where  each  PGSU  has  a  value 
equal  to  one  Barrick  common  share.  At  December  31,  2021,  
2,873 thousand units had been granted at a fair value of $43 million 
(2020: 3,962 thousand units at a fair value of $52 million).

c)  Stock Options
Under  Barrick’s  stock  option  plan,  certain  officers  and  key 
employees  of  the  Company  may  purchase  common  shares  at  an 
exercise  price  that  is  equal  to  the  closing  share  price  on  the  day 
before the grant of the option. The grant date is the date when the 
details  of  the  award,  including  the  number  of  options  granted  by 

individual and the exercise price, are approved. Stock options vest 
evenly over four years, beginning in the year after granting. Options 
are exercisable over seven years. At December 31, 2021, nil (2020: 
0.1 million) stock options were outstanding. 

Compensation  expense  for  stock  options  was  $nil  in  2021 
(2020:  $nil),  and  is  presented  as  a  component  of  corporate 
administration,  consistent  with  the  classification  of  other  elements 
of  compensation  expense  for  those  employees  who  had  stock 
options. The recognition of compensation expense for stock options 
had no impact on earnings per share for 2021 and 2020.

Total  intrinsic  value  relating  to  options  exercised  in  2021  was 
$1 million (2020: $2 million). As at December 31, 2021, there was 
$nil (2020: $nil) of total unrecognized compensation cost relating to 
unvested stock options. 

EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION ACTIVITY (NUMBER OF SHARES IN MILLIONS)

C$ options

At January 1

Exercised

At December 31

US$ options

At January 1

Cancelled/expired

At December 31

35.  CONTINGENCIES
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements 
are issued that may result in a loss to the Company, but which will 
only  be  resolved  when  one  or  more  future  events  occur  or  fail  to 
occur. The impact of any resulting loss from such matters affecting 
these financial statements and noted below may be material.

Litigation and Claims
In  assessing  loss  contingencies  related  to  legal  proceedings  that 
are  pending  against  us  or  unasserted  claims  that  may  result  in 
such  proceedings,  the  Company  with  assistance  from  its  legal 
counsel, evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or 
unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of 
relief sought or expected to be sought.

2021

2020

Shares

0.1

(0.1)

–

–

–

–

Average 
Price

Shares

Average 
Price

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

10

10

–

–

–

–

0.2

(0.1)

0.1

0.1

(0.1)

–

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

10

10

10

32

32

–

Proposed Canadian Securities Class Actions (Pascua-Lama) 
Between April  and  September  2014,  eight  proposed  class  actions 
were  commenced  against  the  Company  in  Canada  in  connection 
with  the  Pascua-Lama  project.  Four  of  the  proceedings  were 
commenced  in  Ontario,  two  were  commenced  in  Alberta,  one 
was  commenced  in  Saskatchewan,  and  one  was  commenced  in 
Quebec.  The  proceedings  alleged  that  the  Company  made  false 
and  misleading  statements  to  the  investing  public  relating  to 
(among  other  things)  capital  cost  and  schedule  estimates  for  the 
Pascua-Lama  project  (the  “Project”),  environmental  compliance 
matters  in  Chile,  as  well  as  alleged  internal  control  failures  and 
certain accounting-related matters. 

Two of the Ontario proceedings were subsequently consolidated 
into one proceeding. That consolidated proceeding and the Quebec 
proceeding have moved ahead in the manner described below. None 
of  the  other  five  proceedings  has  been  pursued.  One  was  never 
served, one was dismissed on consent, two were discontinued and 
one was stayed by Court order.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 197

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  Statement  of  Claim  in  the  remaining  Ontario  proceeding 
indicates that the proposed representative plaintiffs purport to seek 
damages on behalf of any person who acquired Barrick securities 
during  the  period  from  May  7,  2009  to  November  1,  2013.  The 
defendants in this proceeding are the Company and Aaron Regent, 
Jamie  Sokalsky,  Ammar  Al-Joundi  and  Peter  Kinver  (all  of  whom 
are  former  officers  of  the  Company),  and  the  claim  for  damages 
is stated to be more than $3 billion. In August 2018, the Company 
and other defendants delivered their Statement of Defence. In June 
2019, plaintiffs’ counsel indicated that they are pursuing claims only 
in respect of the period from July 28, 2011 to November 1, 2013. 

The Quebec proceeding purports to be on behalf of any person 
who  resides  in  Quebec  and  acquired  Barrick  securities  during  
the  period  from  May  7,  2009  to  November  1,  2013.  However, 
the  parties  agreed  that,  by  operation  of  the  applicable  statute  of 
limitations,  statutory  secondary  market  misrepresentation  claims 
could only be pursued in respect of the period from April 30, 2011 
to  November  1,  2013.  The  focus  of  the  Quebec  proceeding  is  on 
allegations  concerning  the  Company’s  public  disclosures  relating 
to  matters  of  environmental  compliance.  The  defendants  are  the 
Company and Messrs. Regent, Sokalsky, Al-Joundi and Kinver, and 
an unspecified amount of damages is being sought. No Statement 
of Defence has been filed or is required to be filed at this stage.

In  both  Ontario  and  Quebec,  the  proposed  representative 
plaintiffs  have  brought  motions  seeking:  (i)  leave  of  the  Court 
to  proceed  with  statutory  secondary  market  misrepresentation 
claims  pursuant  to  provincial  securities  legislation;  and  (ii)  orders 
certifying  the  actions  as  class  actions,  and  therefore  allowing  the 
proposed  representative  plaintiffs  to  pursue  statutory  secondary 
market misrepresentation claims and other claims on behalf of the 
proposed classes. 

In  the  Quebec  proceeding,  both  motions  were  heard  in  May 
2019  with  additional  oral  submissions  in  December  2019.  In 
March  2020,  the  Superior  Court  of  Quebec  denied  both  motions. 
As a result, subject to appeal, the proposed representative plaintiff 
cannot  pursue  the  statutory  secondary  market  misrepresentation 
claims,  and  can  only  pursue  his  other  purported  claims  on  an 
individual  basis  rather  than  on  behalf  of  other  shareholders.  The 
proposed  representative  plaintiff  has  filed  an  appeal.  The  hearing 
of that appeal has not yet been scheduled.

In the Ontario proceeding, the motion for leave to proceed with 
statutory secondary market misrepresentation claims was heard in 
July  2019.  In  October  2019,  the  Ontario  Superior  Court  of  Justice 
dismissed  all  but  one  of  those  claims,  and  dismissed  all  of  the 
statutory  secondary  market  misrepresentation  claims  as  against 
Mr.  Regent  and  Mr.  Kinver.  With  respect  to  the  sole  remaining 
statutory  secondary  market  misrepresentation  claim,  the  Court 
denied  leave  to  proceed  in  respect  of  securityholders  other  than 
common  shareholders.  The  sole  remaining  statutory  secondary 
market misrepresentation claim pertains to a statement concerning 
the  water  management  system  in  Chile  made  by  the  Company  in 
its  Management’s  Discussion  and Analysis  for  the  second  quarter 
of  2012.  The  Company  filed  a  motion  in  the  Divisional  Court  for 
leave to appeal the decision to allow that claim to proceed, which 
was denied in October 2020. The proposed representative plaintiffs  
filed  an  appeal  to  the  Ontario  Court  of  Appeal  in  respect  of  the 
claims  that  were  dismissed,  which  was  heard  over  two  days  in 
November 2020.

On February 19, 2021, the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the 
proposed representative plaintiffs’ appeal in part. The Ontario Court 
of Appeal set aside the Ontario Superior Court’s decision dismissing 
statutory secondary market misrepresentation claims pertaining to 
the Company’s capital cost and scheduling estimates as well as to 
certain  accounting  and  financial  reporting  issues,  and  remitted  to 

the  Ontario  Superior  Court  the  issue  of  whether  leave  to  proceed 
should  be  granted  in  respect  of  those  claims.  The  Ontario  Court 
of Appeal upheld the Ontario Superior Court’s decision dismissing 
statutory secondary market misrepresentation claims pertaining to 
certain environmental matters in Chile. The Company subsequently 
filed  an  application  for  leave  to  appeal  to  the  Supreme  Court  of 
Canada. This application was dismissed on July 29, 2021. 

As a result, the case has been returned to the Ontario Superior 
Court, which will determine anew whether to grant leave to proceed 
with  the  balance  of  the  plaintiffs’  statutory  secondary  market 
misrepresentations claims. The Superior Court heard the Plaintiffs’ 
motion  for  leave  to  proceed  in  respect  of  those  claims  in  January 
2022. The Court has reserved its judgment.

The  motion  for  class  certification  in  Ontario  has  not  yet  been 
heard.  The  Ontario  Superior  Court  has  indicated  that  it  currently 
does not intend to hear that motion until after the plaintiffs’ motion 
for  leave  to  proceed  in  respect  of  the  balance  of  their  statutory 
secondary market misrepresentation claims is determined.

The  Company  intends  to  vigorously  defend  the  remaining 
proposed  Canadian  securities  class  actions.  No  amounts  have 
been  recorded  for  any  potential  liability  arising  from  any  of  the 
proposed class actions, as the Company cannot reasonably predict 
the outcome. 

Pascua-Lama – SMA Regulatory Sanctions 
In May 2013, Compañía Minera Nevada (“CMN”), Barrick’s Chilean 
subsidiary that holds the Chilean portion of the Project, received a 
Resolution  (the  “Original  Resolution”)  from  Chile’s  environmental 
regulator (the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente, or “SMA”) that 
requires  CMN  to  complete  the  water  management  system  for  the 
Project in accordance with the Project’s environmental permit before 
resuming  construction  activities  in  Chile.  The  Original  Resolution 
also  required  CMN  to  pay  an  administrative  fine  of  approximately 
$16 million for deviations from certain requirements of the Project’s 
Chilean  environmental  approval,  including  a  series  of  reporting 
requirements  and  instances  of  non-compliance  related  to  the 
Project’s water management system. CMN paid the administrative 
fine in May 2013. 

In  June  2013,  CMN  began  engineering  studies  to  review  the 
Project’s  water  management  system  in  accordance  with  the 
Original  Resolution.  The  studies  were  suspended  in  the  second 
half of 2015 as a result of CMN’s decision to file a temporary and 
partial closure plan for the Project. The review of the Project’s water 
management  system  may  require  a  new  environmental  approval 
and the construction of additional water management facilities. 

In  June  2013,  a  group  of  local  farmers  and  indigenous 
communities  challenged  the  Original  Resolution.  The  challenge, 
which  was  brought  in  the  Environmental  Court  of  Santiago,  Chile 
(the  “Environmental  Court”),  claimed  that  the  fine  was  inadequate 
and  requested  more  severe  sanctions  against  CMN  including 
the  revocation  of  the  Project’s  environmental  permit.  The  SMA 
presented  its  defense  of  the  Original  Resolution  in  July  2013.  On 
August  2,  2013,  CMN  joined  as  a  party  to  this  proceeding  and 
vigorously  defended  the  Original  Resolution.  On  March  3,  2014, 
the  Environmental  Court  annulled  the  Original  Resolution  and 
remanded  the  matter  back  to  the  SMA  for  further  consideration  in 
accordance with its decision (the “Environmental Court Decision”). 
In particular, the Environmental Court ordered the SMA to issue a 
new administrative decision that recalculated the amount of the fine 
to  be  paid  by  CMN  using  a  different  methodology  and  addressed 
certain  other  errors  it  identified  in  the  Original  Resolution.  The 
Environmental  Court  did  not  annul  the  portion  of  the  Original 
Resolution  that  required  the  Company  to  halt  construction  on  the 
Chilean  side  of  the  Project  until  the  water  management  system  is 

198

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
completed  in  accordance  with  the  Project’s  environmental  permit. 
On  December  30,  2014,  the  Chilean  Supreme  Court  declined  to 
consider  CMN’s  appeal  of  the  Environmental  Court  Decision  on 
procedural  grounds. As  a  result  of  the  Supreme  Court’s  ruling,  on 
April  22,  2015,  the  SMA  reopened  the  administrative  proceeding 
against CMN in accordance with the Environmental Court Decision. 
On April 22, 2015, CMN was notified that the SMA had initiated 
a new administrative proceeding for alleged deviations from certain  
requirements  of  the  Project’s  environmental  approval,  including 
with respect to the Project’s environmental impact and a series of 
monitoring requirements. In May 2015, CMN submitted a compliance 
program  to  address  certain  of  the  allegations  and  presented  its  
defense to the remainder of the alleged deviations. The SMA rejected  
CMN’s proposed compliance program on June 24, 2015, and denied 
CMN’s  administrative  appeal  of  that  decision  on  July  31,  2015.  
On  December  30,  2016,  the  Environmental  Court  rejected  CMN’s 
appeal and CMN declined to challenge this decision. 

On June 8, 2016, the SMA consolidated the two administrative 
proceedings  against  CMN  into  a  single  proceeding  encompassing 
both  the  reconsideration  of  the  Original  Resolution  in  accordance 
with  the  decision  of  the  Environmental  Court  and  the  alleged 
deviations from the Project’s environmental approval notified by the 
SMA in April 2015. 

reduced 

the  original  administrative 

On January 17, 2018, CMN received the revised resolution (the 
“Revised  Resolution”)  from  the  SMA,  in  which  the  environmental 
regulator 
from 
approximately $16 million to $11.5 million and ordered the closure 
of  existing  surface  facilities  on  the  Chilean  side  of  the  Project  in 
addition  to  certain  monitoring  activities.  The  Revised  Resolution 
does  not  revoke  the  Project’s  environmental  approval.  CMN  filed 
an  appeal  of  the  Revised  Resolution  on  February  3,  2018  with 
the  First  Environmental  Court  of  Antofagasta  (the  “Antofagasta 
Environmental Court”). 

fine 

On  October  12,  2018,  the  Antofagasta  Environmental  Court 
issued  an  administrative  ruling  ordering  review  of  the  significant 
sanctions  ordered  by  the  SMA.  CMN  was  not  a  party  to  this 
process. In its ruling, the Antofagasta Environmental Court rejected 
four of the five closure orders contained in the Revised Resolution 
and remanded the related environmental infringements back to the 
SMA for further consideration. A new resolution from the SMA with 
respect to the sanctions for these four infringements could include a 
range of potential sanctions, including additional fines, as provided 
in  the  Chilean  legislation.  The  Antofagasta  Environmental  Court 
upheld the SMA’s decision to order the closure of the Chilean side 
of the Project for the fifth infringement. 

Following the issuance of the Revised Resolution, the Company 
reversed  the  estimated  amount  previously  recorded  for  any 
additional proposed administrative fines in this matter. In addition, 
the  Company  reclassified  Pascua-Lama’s  proven  and  probable 
gold reserves as measured and indicated resources and recorded  
a pre-tax impairment of $429 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. 
No additional amounts have been recorded for any potential liability 
arising from the Antofagasta Environmental Court’s October 12, 2018  
ruling  and  subsequent  review  by  the  SMA,  as  the  Company 
cannot  reasonably  predict  any  potential  losses  and  the  SMA 
has  not  issued  any  additional  proposed  administrative  fines. 
On  March  14,  2019,  the  Chilean  Supreme  Court  annulled 
the  October  12,  2018  administrative  decision  of  the  Antofagasta 
Environmental  Court  on  procedural  grounds  and  remanded  the 
case back to the Environmental Court for review by a different panel 
of judges. The Chilean Supreme Court did not review the merits of 
the Revised Resolution, which remains in effect.

On September 17, 2020, the Antofagasta Environmental Court 
issued  a  ruling  in  which  it  upheld  the  closure  order  and  sanctions 
imposed on CMN by the SMA in the Revised Resolution from January 
2018. As part of its ruling, the Environmental Court also ordered the 
SMA  to  reevaluate  certain  environmental  infringements  contained 
in  the  Revised  Resolution  which  may  result  in  the  imposition  of 
additional  fines  against  CMN.  The  Company  confirmed  that  it  will 
not appeal the Environmental Court’s decision, and the Chilean side 
of  the  Pascua-Lama  project  will  now  be  transitioned  to  closure  in 
accordance with that ruling. 

On  October  6,  2020,  a  group  of  local  farmers  challenged  the 
Environmental Court’s decision. The challenge, which was brought 
before  the  Chilean  Supreme  Court,  claims  that  the  fines  imposed 
by  the  SMA  were  inadequate  and  seeks  to  require  the  SMA  to 
issue  additional  and  more  severe  sanctions  against  CMN.  The 
Chilean  Supreme  Court  has  accepted  the  appeal  and  the  parties 
have presented their arguments on the merits. The decision of the 
Chilean Supreme Court is pending. 

Veladero – Operational Incidents and Associated Proceedings 
Minera Andina del Sol SRL (formerly, Minera Argentina Gold SRL) 
(“MAS”), the joint venture company that operates the Veladero mine, 
is the subject of various regulatory proceedings related to operational 
incidents  at  the  Veladero  Valley  Leach  Facility  (“VLF”)  occurring 
in  March  2017  (the  “March  2017  incident”),  September  2016  (the 
“September 2016 incident”) and September 2015 (the “September 
2015  incident”),  and  involving  the  San  Juan  Provincial  mining 
authority,  the Argentine  federal  government,  and  certain  residents 
of Jachal, Argentina. Regulatory authorities were notified following 
the occurrence of each of these incidents, and remediation and/or  
monitoring  activities  were  undertaken  as  appropriate.  Although 
the  September  2015  incident  resulted  in  the  release  of  cyanide-
bearing  process  solution  into  a  nearby  waterway,  environmental 
monitoring conducted by MAS and an independent third party has 
demonstrated  that  the  incident  posed  no  risk  to  human  health  at 
downstream  communities.  Monitoring  and  inspection  following  the 
September 2016 incident and remediation and inspection following 
the  March  2017  incidents  confirmed  that  those  incidents  did  not 
result in any long-term environmental impacts. 

Regulatory Proceedings and Actions 
San Juan Provincial Regulatory Proceedings
On  October  9,  2015,  the  San  Juan  Provincial  mining  authority 
initiated  an  administrative  sanction  process  against  MAS  for 
alleged  violations  of  the  Mining  Code  relating  to  the  September 
2015  incident.  MAS  was  formally  notified  of  the  imposition  of  an 
administrative  fine  in  connection  with  the  incident  on  March  15, 
2016. MAS sought reconsideration of certain aspects of the decision 
but paid the administrative fine of approximately $10 million (at the 
then-applicable Argentine peso to U.S. dollar exchange rate) while 
the  request  for  reconsideration  was  pending.  After  the  San  Juan 
government  rejected  MAS’  administrative  appeal  of  this  decision, 
on  September  5,  2017,  the  Company  commenced  a  legal  action  
to  continue  challenging  certain  aspects  of  the  decision  before  the 
San Juan courts, which is ongoing.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 199

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsMAS is also the subject of a consolidated provincial regulatory 
proceeding  related  to  the  September  2016  incident  and  the  
March  2017  incident.  MAS  received  notice  of  a  resolution  on  
December 27, 2017, from the San Juan Provincial mining authority 
requiring  payment  of  an  administrative  fine  of  approximately  
$5.6  million  (calculated  at  the  prevailing  exchange  rate  on  
December 31, 2017) for both the September 2016 incident and the 
March 2017 incident. On January 23, 2018, in accordance with local 
requirements, MAS paid the administrative fine and filed a request  
for  reconsideration  with  the  San  Juan  Provincial  mining  authority.  
MAS  was  notified  in  March  2018  that  the  San  Juan  Provincial 
mining authority had rejected the request for reconsideration of the 
administrative  fine. A  further  appeal  will  be  heard  and  decided  by 
the Governor of San Juan.

Provincial Amparo Action
Following  the  March  2017  incident,  an  “amparo”  protection  action 
(the “Provincial Amparo Action”) was filed against MAS in the Jachal 
First  Instance  Court,  San  Juan  Province  (the  “Jachal  Court”)  by 
individuals who claimed to be living in Jachal, San Juan Province, 
Argentina,  seeking  the  cessation  of  all  activities  at  the  Veladero 
mine or, alternatively, a suspension of the mine’s leaching process. 
On  March  30,  2017,  the  Jachal  Court  rejected  the  request  for  an 
injunction to cease all activities at the Veladero mine, but ordered, 
among  other  things,  the  suspension  of  the  leaching  process.  The 
Jachal Court lifted the leaching process suspension in June 2017. 
The  Jachal  Court  tried  to  join  this  proceeding  with  the  Federal 
Amparo Action (as defined below), triggering a jurisdictional dispute. 
On December 26, 2019, the Argentine Supreme Court ruled on the 
jurisdictional  dispute  in  favor  of  the  Federal  Court  in  connection 
with the Federal Amparo Action described below, meaning that the 
Jachal  Court  has  retained  jurisdiction  over  the  Provincial Amparo 
Action  and  the  two  amparo  actions  were  not  effectively  joined.  
The  Provincial Amparo Action  case  file  has  not  yet  been  remitted 
to  the  Jachal  Court  by  the  Supreme  Court  (see  “Federal Amparo 
Action” below).

Federal Amparo Action
On April 4, 2017, the National Minister of Environment of Argentina 
filed an amparo protection action in the Federal Court in connection 
with the March 2017 incident (the “Federal Amparo Action”) seeking 
an order requiring the cessation and/or suspension of activities at 
the  Veladero  mine.  MAS  submitted  extensive  information  to  the 
Federal  Court  about  the  incident,  the  then-existing  administrative 
and  provincial  judicial  suspensions,  the  remedial  actions  taken  by 
the Company and the lifting of the suspension orders described in 
the Provincial Amparo Action above, and challenged the jurisdiction 
of the Federal Court as well as the standing of the National Minister 
of  Environment  and  requested  that  the  matter  be  remanded  to 
the  Jachal  Court.  The  Province  of  San  Juan  also  challenged  the 
jurisdiction  of  the  Federal  Court  in  this  matter.  On  December  26, 
2019,  the  Argentine  Supreme  Court  ruled  on  the  jurisdictional 
dispute in favor of the Federal Court. The Company was notified on 
October 1, 2020, that the National Ministry of the Environment had 
petitioned  the  Federal  Court  to  resume  the  proceedings  following 
the Supreme Court’s decision that the Federal Court is competent 
to hear the case. The Federal Court ordered the resumption of the 
proceedings on February 19, 2021.

Civil Action
On  December  15,  2016,  MAS  was  served  notice  of  a  civil  action  
filed  before  the  San  Juan  Provincial  Court  by  certain  persons 
allegedly  living  in  Jachal,  San  Juan  Province,  claiming  to  be 
affected  by  the  Veladero  mine  and,  in  particular,  the  VLF.  The 
plaintiffs requested a court order that MAS cease leaching metals 
with cyanide solutions, mercury and other similar substances at the 
mine  and  replace  that  process  with  one  that  is  free  of  hazardous 
substances,  implement  a  closure  and  remediation  plan  for  the 
VLF  and  surrounding  areas,  and  create  a  committee  to  monitor 
this process. These claims were supplemented by new allegations 
that the risk of environmental damage had increased as a result of 
the  March  2017  incident.  MAS  replied  to  the  lawsuit  in  February 
2017 and it also responded to the supplement claim and intends to 
continue defending this matter vigorously.

Criminal Matters
Provincial Criminal Proceedings
In August 2017, the San Juan Court of Appeals confirmed criminal 
indictments  against  eight  current  and  former  MAS  employees 
in  connection  with  the  September  2015  incident  (the  “Provincial 
Criminal  Action”).  MAS  is  not  a  party  to  the  Provincial  Criminal 
Action. On August 23, 2018, the defendants in the Provincial Criminal 
Action were granted probation. All defendants have now completed 
the  probationary  period  and,  having  complied  with  good  behavior 
and community service requirements, have requested dismissal of 
the charges against them without admitting to any wrongdoing. On 
June 21, 2021, the Court issued a decision dismissing all charges 
against the defendants. The case is now closed.

Federal Criminal Matters
A  federal  criminal  investigation  was  initiated  by  a  Buenos  Aires 
federal  court  (the  “Federal  Court”)  based  on  the  alleged  failure 
of  certain  current  and  former  federal  and  provincial  government 
officials and individual directors of MAS to prevent the September 
2015  incident  (the  “Federal  Investigation”).  On  May  5,  2016,  the 
National  Supreme  Court  of  Argentina  limited  the  scope  of  the 
Federal Investigation to the potential criminal liability of the federal 
officials, ruling that the Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to 
investigate the solution release.

On April 11, 2018, the federal judge indicted three former federal 
officials, alleging breach of duty in connection with their actions and 
omissions related to the failure to maintain adequate environmental 
controls during 2015 and the case was sent to trial.

In June 2018, the federal judge ordered additional environmental 
studies in the communities downstream from the Veladero mine, but 
this order was overturned due to lack of jurisdiction by the Federal 
Supreme Court on October 8, 2020.

Glacier Investigation
On October 17, 2016, a separate criminal investigation was initiated 
by the federal judge overseeing the Federal Investigation based on 
the alleged failure of federal officials to regulate the Veladero mine 
under  Argentina’s  glacier  legislation  (the  “Glacier  Investigation”) 
with  regard  to  the  September  2015  incident.  On  June  16,  2017, 
MAS submitted a motion to challenge the federal judge’s decision to 
assign the Glacier Investigation to himself, and to request that it be 
admitted as a party in order to present evidence supporting MAS. 
On September 14, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeals ordered the 
federal judge to consolidate the two investigations and clarified that 
MAS is not a party to the case and therefore does not have standing 
to seek the recusal of the federal judge, but nonetheless recognized 
MAS’ right to continue to participate in the case (without clarifying 
the scope of those rights).

200

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsOn November 27, 2017, the federal judge indicted four former 
federal officials, alleging abuse of authority in connection with their 
actions  and  omissions  related  to  the  enforcement  of  Argentina’s 
glacier legislation. The Court of Appeals confirmed the indictments 
and on August 6, 2018, the case was assigned to a federal trial judge.
In  total,  six  former  federal  officials  were  indicted  under  the 
Federal  Investigation  and  the  Glacier  Investigation  and  will  face 
trial. In 2019, one of the former federal officials, who was indicted 
on  separate  charges  under  both  investigations,  passed  away  and 
charges against him were dropped.

Due  to  the  Argentine  response  to  Covid-19  and  a  procedural 
challenge by one of the former federal officials, the oral arguments 
originally scheduled for April and May 2020 in this matter have been 
postponed and have not yet been rescheduled.

for  2010  and  2011,  amounting 

Veladero – Tax Assessment and Criminal Charges
On December 26, 2017, MAS received notice of a tax assessment 
to  
(the  “Tax  Assessment”) 
ARS  543  million  (approximately  $6.5  million  at  the  prevailing 
exchange rate at December 31, 2020), plus interest and fines. The 
Tax Assessment  primarily  claims  that  certain  deductions  made  by 
MAS were not properly characterized, including that (i) the interest 
and foreign exchange on loans borrowed between 2002 and 2006 
to  fund  Veladero’s  construction  should  have  been  classified  as 
equity  contributions,  and  (ii)  fees  paid  for  intercompany  services 
were not for services related to the operation of the Veladero mine.
On  June  21,  2018,  the  Argentinean  Federal  Tax  Authority 
(“AFIP”)  confirmed  the  Tax  Assessment,  which  MAS  appealed  to 
the Federal Tax Court on July 31, 2018. A hearing for the appeal has 
not yet been scheduled.

The  Company  filed  Mutual Agreement  Procedure  applications 
in Canada on December 21, 2018, and in Argentina on March 29, 
2019,  pursuant  to  the  Canada-Argentina  Income  Tax  Convention 
Act  (the  “Canada-Argentina  Tax  Treaty”)  to  escalate  resolution  of 
the Tax Assessment  to  the  competent  authority  (as  defined  in  the 
Canada-Argentina Tax Treaty) in an effort to seek efficient resolution 
of the matter.

In November 2018, MAS received notice that AFIP filed criminal 
charges against current and former employees serving on its board 
of  directors  when  the  2010  and  2011  tax  returns  were  filed  (the 
“Criminal Tax Case”).

Hearings for the Criminal Tax Case were held between March 25  
and  March  27,  2019.  The  defendants  filed  a  motion  to  dismiss 
based on the statute of limitations, which was granted in part and 
appealed by the prosecution.

On  June  2,  2021  the  trial  court  issued  a  decision  dismissing 
the  Criminal  Tax  Case  against  the  directors.  AFIP  appealed  and 
on  September  24,  2021,  the  Mendoza  Federal  Court  of  Appeals 
partially  reversed  the  trial  court’s  decision,  ruling  that  there  was 
insufficient  evidence  to  either  indict  the  directors  or  dismiss  the 
case  against  them,  and  ordering  additional  investigation  by  the 
trial court. The Criminal Tax Case was remanded to the trial court 
in  accordance  with  the  decision  of  the  Mendoza  Federal  Court  of 
Appeals, and the trial court has ordered additional evidence to be 
prepared by the court-appointed expert. 
The  Company  believes  that  the Tax Assessment  and  the  Criminal 
Tax Case are without merit and intends to defend the proceedings 
vigorously.

Perilla Complaint
In 2009, Barrick Gold Inc. and Placer Dome Inc. were purportedly 
served  in  Ontario  with  a  complaint  filed  in  November  2008  in  the 
Regional Trial Court of Boac (the “Court”), on the Philippine island 
of Marinduque, on behalf of two named individuals and purportedly 
on  behalf  of  the  approximately  200,000  residents  of  Marinduque. 
The  complaint  alleges  injury  to  the  economy  and  the  ecology  
of  Marinduque  as  a  result  of  the  discharge  of  mine  tailings  from  
the  Marcopper  mine  into  Calancan  Bay,  the  Boac  River,  and  the 
Mogpog  River.  Placer  Dome  Inc.,  which  was  acquired  by  the 
Company  in  2006,  had  been  a  minority  indirect  shareholder  of 
the  Marcopper  mine.  The  plaintiffs  are  claiming  for  abatement  of 
a  public  nuisance  allegedly  caused  by  the  tailings  discharge  and 
for nominal damages for an alleged violation of their constitutional 
right  to  a  balanced  and  healthful  ecology.  In  June  2010,  Barrick 
Gold  Inc.  and  Placer  Dome  Inc.  filed  a  motion  to  have  the  Court 
resolve  their  unresolved  motions  to  dismiss  before  considering 
the plaintiffs’ motion to admit an amended complaint and also filed 
an  opposition  to  the  plaintiffs’  motion  to  admit  on  the  same  basis. 
By  Order  dated  November  9,  2011,  the  Court  granted  a  motion  to 
suspend the proceedings filed by the plaintiffs. It is not known when 
these motions or the outstanding motions to dismiss will be decided 
by  the  Court.  To  date  neither  the  plaintiffs  nor  the  Company  has 
advised  the  Court  of  an  intention  to  resume  the  proceedings. The 
Company intends to defend the action vigorously. No amounts have 
been recorded for any potential liability under this complaint, as the 
Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome. 

Writ of Kalikasan 
In February 2011, a Petition for the Issuance of a Writ of Kalikasan 
with  Prayer  for  Temporary  Environmental  Protection  Order  was 
filed  in  the  Supreme  Court  of  the  Republic  of  the  Philippines  (the 
“Supreme Court”) in Eliza M. Hernandez, Mamerto M. Lanete and 
Godofredo L. Manoy (the “Petitioners”) versus Placer Dome Inc. and 
Barrick Gold Corporation. In March 2011, the Supreme Court issued 
an  En  Banc  Resolution  and  Writ  of  Kalikasan,  directed  service  of 
summons on Placer Dome Inc. (“Placer Dome”) and the Company, 
ordered  Placer  Dome  and  the  Company  to  make  a  verified  return 
of  the  Writ  within  ten  (10)  days  of  service  and  referred  the  case 
to  the  Court  of  Appeal  (the  “Court”)  for  hearing.  The  Petition 
alleges  that  Placer  Dome  violated  the  Petitioners’  constitutional 
right  to  a  balanced  and  healthful  ecology  as  a  result  of,  among 
other things, the discharge of tailings into Calancan Bay, the 1993 
Maguila-Guila  dam  break,  the  1996  Boac  River  tailings  spill  and 
failure  of  Marcopper  to  properly  decommission  the  Marcopper 
mine. The Petitioners have pleaded that the Company is liable for 
the  alleged  actions  and  omissions  of  Placer  Dome,  which  was  a 
minority  indirect  shareholder  of  Marcopper  at  all  relevant  times, 
and  is  seeking  orders  requiring  the  Company  to  environmentally 
remediate the areas in and around the mine site that are alleged to 
have sustained environmental impacts. A Writ of Kalikasan brought 
under the then-new Rules of Procedure in Environmental Cases (the 
“Environmental Rules”) is intended to be a mechanism for speedy 
relief  and  the  Environmental  Rules  impose  rigid  deadlines  and 
other requirements on such proceedings, including that a petitioner 
file  and  serve  all  evidence  on  which  it  relies  at  the  outset  of  the 
proceeding  and  a  respondent  file  all  evidence  on  which  it  relies 
within 10 days of being served. While the Company complied with 
this  requirement  and  filed  extensive  affidavit  evidence,  including 
expert affidavits, at the time it filed its Return Ad Cautelam in April 
2011, the Petitioners did not file any affidavits in support of their Writ 
and  the  only  evidence  filed  or  referenced  by  the  Petitioners  was 
various  documents  and  news  articles  with  no  person  testifying  to 
their contents. The Company filed a motion challenging the Court’s 
jurisdiction  over  both  the  proceedings  and  the  Company  at  the 
outset of the proceedings, and also challenged the constitutionality 
of the Environmental Rules pursuant to which the Petition was filed.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 201

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsIn  October  2011,  the  proceedings  were  suspended  to  permit 
the  Petitioners  to  explore  the  possibility  of  a  settlement. Although 
discussions  ended  without  a  resulting  settlement  by  December 
2013,  with  the  exception  of  a  few  inquiries  by  the  Court  as  to 
the  status  of  the  settlement  and  the  Petitioners’  intentions,  the 
proceedings  remained  essentially  inactive  between  October  2011 
and  September  2018  when  the  Petitioners  sought  to  have  the 
suspension lifted and the proceedings resume. 

In March 2019, the Court lifted the suspension of proceedings. 
Between  March  2019,  when  the  suspension  of  proceedings  was 
lifted and January 2020, the Court has: (i) rejected the Company’s 
constitutional  objections  and  held  that  the  Court  has  jurisdiction 
based  on  a  “tentative”  determination  that  the  Company  was 
doing  business  in  the  Philippines  made  exclusively  on  the  basis 
of  unproved  allegations  made  by  the  Petitioners  in  their  petition; 
(ii)  directed  a  court-annexed  mediation,  which  did  not  result  in 
settlement;  (iii)  dismissed  the  Company’s  arguments  that  the 
proceedings should be dismissed for delay, laches and due process 
reasons;  (iv)  conducted  a  preliminary  case  conference  in  January 
2020; and (v) permitted the Petitioners to file late two affidavits in 
September  2019,  over  the  Company’s  objections.  The  Company 
has consistently challenged all adverse Court decisions, including 
by  way  of  certiorari  to  the  Supreme  Court.  In  all  instances,  such 
attempts have been unsuccessful.

A  tentative  trial  date  in  March  2020  was  postponed  due  to 
the  Philippine  government’s  response  to  the  Covid-19  pandemic. 
Subsequently,  a  September  2020  trial  date  was  set,  but  later 
cancelled  by  the  Court  because  of  a  late  request  by  Petitioners’ 
counsel, over the objections of the Company.

Since June 2020, the Petitioners have taken numerous steps to 
attempt to seek to expand the issues for consideration by the Court 
in these proceedings beyond the scope of the original Writ and also 
to  supplement  the  evidentiary  record  outside  the  strict  limitations 
of  the  Environment  Rules,  including  by:  (i)  filing  a  motion  asking 
the Court to issue a Temporary Environmental Protection Order on 
broader  grounds  than  those  pleaded  in  the  original  Writ;  (ii)  filing 
a  motion  requesting  a  discovery  order  for  the  “ocular  inspection” 
of  various  physical  locations  in  or  around  the  Marcopper  Mine 
site  on  the  basis  of  alleged  issues  not  previously  pleaded  in  the 
original Writ; and (iii) filing a motion days prior to a scheduled trial 
date  seeking  to  cancel  the  trial  date  and  revert  the  proceedings 
to  the  preliminary  conference  stage  to  allow  the  Petitioners  to 
file  additional  evidence,  to  add  additional  individuals  to  their  list 
of  witnesses,  and  to  file  additional  judicial  affidavits  on  behalf  of 
additional witnesses. The Company has objected to such steps in 
materials filed with the Court. 

On October 27, 2020, the Province of Marinduque filed a Motion 
for Leave to Intervene and a Petition in Intervention in the Supreme 
Court  (the  “Intervention  Motion”).  In  the  Intervention  Motion,  the 
Province sought leave to intervene in the case and effectively also 
sought  to  expand  the  scope  of  relief  to  include  claims  regarding 
alleged maintenance and structural integrity issues of infrastructure 
at the Marcopper Mine site, amongst other issues not raised in the 
original  Writ  of  Kalikasan.  On  November  17,  2020,  the  Supreme 
Court  issued  a  Resolution  referring  the  Intervention  Motion  to 
the  Court;  however,  the  Company  did  not  receive  notice  of  this 
Resolution until January 26, 2021. On January 21, 2021, the Court 
issued  a  resolution  admitting  the  Intervention  Motion  before  the 
Court,  granting  the  Intervention  Motion  and  accepting  for  filing 
the Petition in Intervention. The January 21, 2021 Resolution was 
issued  without  the  Court  affording  the  Company  due  process  and 
an opportunity to respond to the merits of the Intervention Motion. 
On  February  9,  2021  the  Company  filed  a  Motion  for  Partial 
Reconsideration of the January 21, 2021 Resolution seeking to set 
aside  the  granting  of  the  Intervention  Motion  by  the  Court  and  to 
have the Intervention Motion dismissed.

On  November  25,  2020,  the  Court  set  a  new  trial  date  of  
December 2, 2020. The trial began on December 2, 2020, with the 
Petitioners calling a new witness not disclosed prior to September 
2020  and  stating  their  intention  to  call  seven  more  unspecified 
witnesses. The Company has made multiple filings and submissions 
recording  its  objections  to  the  Petitioners  being  permitted  to  call 
witnesses  whose  affidavits  have  been  delivered  outside  the 
prescribed  time  requirements  and  years  after  the  Company  has 
filed its evidence in response to the Petitioners claims.

On  January  7,  2021,  the  Petitioners  filed  an  urgent  motion  to 
cancel the second trial date scheduled for January 11, 2021 on the 
basis  that  the  witness  they  intended  to  call  would  not  be  able  to 
appear at the hearing. The Company objected. Although the Court 
issued  an  order  dismissing  the  Petitioners’  request  to  cancel  the 
January  11,  2021  hearing  date,  the  Court  nevertheless  effectively 
granted the relief sought by the Petitioners by acknowledging that 
the Petitioners’ next witness could be called instead on the reserved 
hearing date on January 27, 2021.

On  January  21,  2021,  the  Court  ruled  on  the  Company’s 
objections to the Petitioners being permitted to call witnesses whose 
affidavits are delivered late and ordered the Petitioners to submit all 
of their remaining judicial affidavits within a non-extendable 15 days  
from  notice  (by  February  10,  2021).  It  is  not  clear  how  many 
additional witnesses the Petitioners intend to call or will be permitted 
to call. The Company intends to seek reconsideration of this ruling.
The  Petitioners  called  one  witness  on  January  27,  2021.  One 
additional  judicial  affidavit  was  delivered  by  the  Petitioners  by 
February  10,  2021  and  the  Petitioners  manifested  their  intention 
to  introduce  additional  evidence  without  judicial  affidavits.  The 
Company  objected  to  Petitioners’  manifested  intention  as  well  as 
to  the  admissibility  of  the  additional  judicial  affidavit  delivered  by 
the Petitioners.

On  February  17,  2021,  the  Province  of  Marinduque  filed  a 
Motion  to  Implead  asking  the  Court  of  Appeal  to  add  Marcopper 
Mining  Corporation  as  a  respondent.  On  March  1,  2021,  the 
Company  filed  both  a  Manifestation  submitting  that  the  Motion  to 
Implead  is  premature  in  light  of  the  Company’s  Motion  for  Partial 
Reconsideration  filed  February  9,  2021,  and  an  Opposition  to  the 
Motion  to  Implead.  The  February  24,  2021  hearing  date  did  not 
proceed.

On March 26, 2021, the Company filed a Petition for Certiorari 
in  the  Supreme  Court  seeking  to  set  aside  the  Court  of  Appeals’ 
rulings of November 25, 2020 and January 21, 2021 relating to the 
Petitioners’  ability  to  call  additional  witnesses  and  file  additional 
judicial affidavits.
On  June  14,  2021,  the  Court  of  Appeals  released  a  Resolution 
denying  the  Company’s  Motion  for  Partial  Reconsideration  filed 
February 9, 2021 as well as the Province of Marinduque’s Motion to 
Implead Marcopper Mining Corporation as a respondent.
  On June 25, 2021, the Company filed a Return Ad Cautelam in 
response to the Province of Marinduque’s Petition for Intervention.

On  July  2,  2021,  the  Province  of  Marinduque  filed  a  Motion 
for  Reconsideration  of  the  June  14,  2021  Resolution  of  the  Court 
of  Appeals  denying  the  Motion  to  Implead  Marcopper  Mining 
Corporation  as  a  respondent.  On  July  15,  2021,  the  Company 
filed  its  Comment  Ad  Cautelam  in  response  to  the  Province  of 
Marinduque’s Motion for Reconsideration.

On  July  26,  2021,  the  Petitioners  filed  their  Formal  Offer  of 
Evidence,  which  formally  concludes  the  Petitioners’  evidence 
portion  of  the  trial.  The  Company  responded  to  and  opposed  the 
Petitioners’ Offer of Evidence on October 27, 2021.

202

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsOn  September  10,  2021,  the  Company  filed  a  Petition  for 
Certiorari of the January 21, 2021 and June 14, 2021 Resolutions 
of the Court of Appeals, which granted the Province of Marinduque 
leave to intervene in the Writ of Kalikasan proceeding and denied 
the Company’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of that decision. 
The Company’s Petition for Certiorari of the January 21, 2021 and 
June 14, 2021 Resolutions of the Court of Appeals was dismissed 
by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on November 10, 2021.

Court  filing  deadlines  in  the  Philippines  were  suspended  from 
August 4, 2021 until October 18, 2021 due to Covid-19 quarantine 
requirements. 

On  November  2,  2021,  the  Company  filed  a  Motion  to  Strike 
and  Reply  in  respect  of  the  Province  of  Marinduque’s  Petition  in 
Intervention.

The next trial date has not been scheduled.
No amounts have been recorded for any potential liability under 
this matter, as the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome. 
The Company intends to continue to defend the action vigorously. 

Reko Diq Arbitration 
Barrick currently indirectly holds 50% of the shares of Tethyan Copper 
Company  Pty  Limited  (“TCC”),  with Antofagasta  plc  (“Antofagasta”)  
indirectly  holding  the  other  50%.  On  November  15,  2011,  the 
Government of the Province of Balochistan notified Tethyan Copper 
Company Pakistan (Private) Limited (“TCCP”) (the local operating 
subsidiary of TCC) of the rejection of TCCP’s application for a mining 
lease for the Reko Diq project, to which TCCP was lawfully entitled 
subject only to “routine” government requirements. On November 28,  
2011,  TCC  filed  a  request  for  international  arbitration  against  the 
Government  of  Pakistan  (“GOP”)  with  the  International  Centre  for 
Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) asserting breaches of 
the  Bilateral  Investment  Treaty  (“BIT”)  between  Australia  (where 
TCC is incorporated) and Pakistan. 

On  March  20,  2017,  the Tribunal  issued  its  decision,  rejecting 
the GOP’s position. In March 2019, ICSID closed the record in the 
arbitration. 

In  July  2019,  ICSID  awarded  $5.84  billion  in  damages  to 
TCC  in  relation  to  the  arbitration  claims  and  unlawful  denial  of 
a  mining  lease  for  the  Reko  Diq  project  (the  “ICSID  Award”). 
Damages include compensation of $4.087 billion in relation to the 
fair  market  value  of  the  Reko  Diq  project  at  the  time  the  mining 
lease  was  denied,  and  interest  until  the  date  of  the  ICSID Award  
of $1.753 billion. Compound interest continues to apply at a rate of 
US Prime +1% per annum until the ICSID Award is paid. 

In November 2019, the GOP applied to annul TCC’s damages 
award, which resulted in an automatic stay on TCC from pursuing 
enforcement  action.  ICSID  has  constituted  a  committee  (the 
“Annulment  Committee”) 
the  annulment  application, 
consisting of a president from South Korea and additional members 
from Mexico and Finland. 

to  hear 

On  September  17,  2020,  with  respect  to  the  automatic  stay 
of  enforcement  of  the  July  12,  2019  ICSID Award,  the Annulment 
Committee ruled that: (i) the stay of enforcement of the ICSID Award 
would be continued on a conditional basis; (ii) Pakistan shall provide 
an unconditional and irrevocable bank guarantee or letter of credit 
for  25%  of  the  ICSID Award,  plus  accrued  interest  as  of  the  date 
of the decision, from a reputable international bank based outside 
of  Pakistan,  pledged  in  favor  of  TCC  and  to  be  released  on  the 
order  of  the  Committee;  (iii)  Pakistan  shall  provide  the Annulment 
Committee with a letter signed by Pakistan’s Minister of Finance or 
the official having full authority to bind Pakistan that, to the extent 
the  ICSID  Award  is  not  annulled,  it  undertakes  to  recognize  and 
pay  the  ICSID Award  in  compliance  with  its  obligations  under  the 
ICSID convention; and (iv) should Pakistan not furnish the security 
and  undertaking  in  the  terms  as  set  out  above,  to  the  satisfaction 
of the Annulment Committee, within 30 days after notification of the 
decision, the stay of enforcement in the amount of 50% of the ICSID 
Award,  plus  accrued  interest  as  of  the  date  of  the  decision,  shall 
be lifted.

If  Pakistan  does  not  satisfy  its  security  and  undertaking 
obligation, in order to commence collection TCC must within 30 days 
satisfy  two  conditions:  (1)  establish  an  escrow  account  under  the 
sole control of an international escrow agent and under the direction 
of the Annulment Committee into which any collected amounts will 
be placed; and (2) provide “an undertaking, to the satisfaction of the 
Annulment  Committee,  that,  if  the  ICSID Award  is  annulled,  TCC 
will pay any amounts that Pakistan cannot recover from the escrow 
account that will hold assets obtained from enforcement, excluding 
those  amounts  due  to  Pakistan’s  third-party  creditors.”  To  date, 
Pakistan has not posted the surety or undertaking.

On November 20, 2020, TCC commenced collection actions in 
the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”). On December 3, 2020, the BVI Court  
recognized  the  ICSID Award,  issued  a  provisional  charging  order 
against  shares  of  PIA  Investments,  Minhal  Inc.  and  PIA  Hotels, 
companies TCC alleges to be assets of the GOP, injunctions against  
dissipation  of  value  and  or  redomiciling  those  companies,  and 
receivership over the assets of those companies. On May 25, 2021, 
at  the  behest  of  the  GOP,  the  BVI  Court  dissolved  the  provisional 
charging order and the injunctions. TCC appealed the BVI Court’s 
decision  to  dissolve  the  order  and  injunctions  to  the  Eastern 
Caribbean Supreme Court and is vigorously prosecuting the appeal.
On  March  16,  2021,  ICSID  registered  a  request  for  revision 
filed  by  the  GOP,  resulting  in  a  provisional  stay  on  enforcement 
of  the  ICSID  Award.  The  original  panel  that  decided  the  case  
has 
request.  On  
September  7,  2021,  the  panel  rejected  Pakistan’s  request  to 
continue  the  provisional  stay  on  enforcement  of  the  ICSID Award 
and lifted it. TCC is vigorously opposing the revision request.

reconstituted 

to  hear 

revision 

itself 

the 

The Annulment  Committee  held  its  merits  hearing  on  May  26 
through  29,  2021.  The  decision  of  the  Annulment  Committee  is 
pending.

The  Company  has  been  engaging  with  the  GOP  to  discuss 
a  mutually  acceptable  framework  agreement  for  the  potential 
development  of  the  Reko  Diq  project.  These  discussions  are 
ongoing, and the parties may not agree on terms for the development 
of  the  project  and  resolution  of TCC’s  dispute  with  the  GOP. TCC 
is continuing to protect its right to payment under the ICSID Award 
while negotiations continue. 

The Company cannot reasonably estimate the financial effect of 

the ICSID Award. No amounts have been recognized at this time. 

Porgera Special Mining Lease Extension
Porgera’s Special Mining Lease (“SML”) terminated on August 16, 
2019. The Company applied for a 20-year extension of the SML in 
June 2017 and has been engaging with the Government of Papua 
New  Guinea  on  this  matter  since  then.  On  August  2,  2019,  the 
National  Court  of  Papua  New  Guinea  ruled  that  the  provisions  of 
the  country’s  1992  Mining  Act  applied  to  the  Porgera  gold  mine, 
thus allowing it to continue operating while the application to extend 
its SML was being considered. 

On  April  25,  2020,  the  Porgera  gold  mine  was  put  on  care 
and  maintenance,  after  Barrick  Niugini  Limited  (“BNL”),  the  95% 
owner  and  operator  of  the  Porgera  joint  venture,  received  a 
communication  from  the  Government  of  Papua  New  Guinea  that 
its  application  for  the  20-year  extension  of  the  SML  had  been 
refused.  While  the  Company  believed  the  Government’s  decision 
not  to  extend  the  SML  was  tantamount  to  nationalization  without 
due process and in violation of the Government’s legal obligations 
to BNL, it nevertheless engaged in discussions with Prime Minister 
Marape  and  his  Government  to  agree  on  a  revised  arrangement 
under which the Porgera mine could be reopened, for the benefit of 
all stakeholders involved. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 203

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsOn April 9, 2021, BNL signed a binding Framework Agreement 
with  the  Independent  State  of  Papua  New  Guinea  (“PNG”)  and 
Kumul  Minerals  Holdings  Limited  (“Kumul  Minerals”),  a  state-
owned  mining  company,  setting  out  the  terms  and  conditions 
for  the  reopening  of  the  Porgera  mine.  On  February  3,  2022, 
the  Framework  Agreement  was  replaced  by  the  more  detailed 
Porgera Project Commencement Agreement (the “Commencement 
Agreement”). The Commencement Agreement was signed by PNG, 
Kumul  Minerals,  BNL  and  its  affiliate  Porgera  (Jersey)  Limited  on 
October  15,  2021,  and  it  became  effective  on  February  3,  2022, 
following  signature  by  Mineral  Resources  Enga  Limited  (“MRE”), 
the holder of the remaining 5% of the original Porgera joint venture. 
The  Commencement  Agreement  reflects  the  commercial  terms 
previously agreed to under the Framework Agreement, namely that 
PNG  stakeholders  will  receive  a  51%  equity  stake  in  the  Porgera 
mine, with the remaining 49% to be held by BNL or an affiliate. BNL 
is jointly owned on a 50/50 basis by Barrick and Zijin Mining Group. 
Accordingly,  following  the  implementation  of  the  Commencement 
Agreement, Barrick’s current 47.5% interest in the Porgera mine is 
expected to be reduced to a 24.5% interest as reflected in Barrick’s 
reserve  and  resource  estimates  for  Porgera.  BNL  will  retain 
operatorship  of  the  mine.  The  Commencement  Agreement  also 
provides that PNG stakeholders and BNL and its affiliates will share 
the economic benefits derived from the reopened Porgera Mine on 
a 53% and 47% basis over the remaining life of mine, respectively, 
and  that  the  Government  of  PNG  will  retain  the  option  to  acquire 
BNL’s or its affiliate’s 49% equity participation at fair market value 
after 10 years.

The  provisions  of  the  Commencement  Agreement  will  be 
implemented,  and  work  to  recommence  full  mine  operations  at 
Porgera will begin, following the execution of a number of definitive 
agreements  and  satisfaction  of  a  number  of  conditions.  These 
include  a  Shareholders  Agreement  among  the  shareholders  of  a 
new  Porgera  joint  venture  company,  an  Operatorship  Agreement 
pursuant  to  which  BNL  will  operate  the  Porgera  mine,  as  well  as 
a  Mine  Development  Contract  to  accompany  the  new  Special 
Mining Lease (“SML”) that the new Porgera joint venture company 
will  apply  for  following  its  incorporation.  Under  the  terms  of  the 
Commencement Agreement,  BNL  will  remain  in  possession  of  the 
site and maintain the mine on care and maintenance.

In the meantime, under standstill arrangements contemplated by 
the  Commencement Agreement,  all  legal  and  arbitral  proceedings 
previously initiated by the parties in relation to the Porgera dispute 
are  to  be  suspended.  These  proceedings  include  Judicial  Review 
actions filed by BNL against the Government of Papua New Guinea 
in April and September 2020, and international arbitration initiated 
by  Barrick  (PD)  Australia  Pty  Limited,  the  Company’s  subsidiary 
and  an  investor  in  the  Porgera  mine,  before  the  World  Bank’s 
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) 
in September 2020. 

In  December  2021,  a  group  of  local  landowners  known  as  the 
Justice Foundation for Porgera initiated a proceeding in the Papua 
New Guinea Supreme Court in which they seek a declaration that 
as  customary  landowners  they  own  and  can  mine  the  minerals 
situated  on  their  customary  lands  including  at  the  Porgera  mine, 
and that certain provisions of the Mining Act and related provisions 
of the Papua New Guinea Constitution are invalid.

BNL  intends  to  intervene  in  this  matter  to  protect  its  rights 
under  the  Commencement Agreement  and  will  defend  its  position 
vigorously. 

On February 10, 2022, the Company was informed that certain 
directors of a shareholder of MRE have sought standing to challenge 
the  validity  of  MRE’s  signature  of  the  Commencement Agreement 
and this matter has been referred to mediation to which BNL is not 
a party.

Porgera Tax Audits
In  April  2020,  BNL  received  a  position  paper  from  the  Internal 
Revenue  Commission  (“IRC”)  in  Papua  New  Guinea  asserting 
various  proposed  adjustments  and  other  tax  liabilities  amounting 
to  $131  million  (not  including  penalties,  based  on  the  kina  foreign 
exchange  rate  as  at  December  31,  2021)  arising  from  tax  audits 
of  BNL  conducted  for  2006  through  2015.  BNL  responded  to 
the  position  paper  on  June  30,  2020.  On  October  2,  2020,  BNL 
received amended assessments from the IRC which increased the 
amount  of  proposed  adjustments  and  other  taxes  to  $485  million 
(including  penalties,  based  on  the  kina  foreign  exchange  rate  as 
at December 31, 2021). The Company has reviewed the amended 
assessments and concluded that there is no merit to the IRC’s tax 
audit  adjustments,  except  for  certain  immaterial  items  for  which 
a  provision  had  already  been  made.  BNL  filed  objections  to  the 
amended assessments on November 30, 2020 in accordance with 
the Papua New Guinea Income Tax Act, and the Company remains 
in discussions with the IRC with respect to this matter.

The Company intends to defend its position vigorously and has 
not  recorded  any  additional  estimated  amounts  for  the  potential 
liability  arising  from  the  amended  assessments  as  the  Company 
cannot reasonably predict the outcome.

Tanzania – Concentrate Export Ban and Related Disputes 
On March 3, 2017, the GoT announced a general ban on the export 
of  metallic  mineral  concentrates  (the  “Ban”)  following  a  directive 
made  by  the  President  to  promote  the  creation  of  a  domestic 
smelting industry. Following the directive, Acacia ceased all exports 
of its gold/copper concentrate (“concentrate”) including containers 
previously approved for export prior to the Ban located at the port 
in Dar es Salaam. 

During the second quarter of 2017, the GoT initiated investigations 
which  resulted  in  allegations  of  historical  undeclared  revenue  and 
unpaid  taxes  by  Acacia  and  its  predecessor  companies.  Acacia 
subsequently  received  adjusted  assessments  for  the  tax  years 
2000–2017 from the Tanzania Revenue Authority for a total amount 
of approximately $190 billion for alleged unpaid taxes, interest and 
penalties. In addition, following the end of the third quarter of 2017, 
Acacia  was  served  with  notices  of  conflicting  adjusted  corporate 
income  tax  and  withholding  tax  assessments  for  tax  years  2005 
to  2011  with  respect  to  Acacia’s  former  Tulawaka  joint  venture, 
and  demands  for  payment,  for  a  total  amount  of  approximately  
$3  billion. Acacia  disputed  these  assessments  through  arbitration 
and the Tanzanian tax appeals process, respectively. 

In addition to the Ban, new and amended legislation was passed 
in Tanzania in early July 2017, including various amendments to the 
2010  Mining Act  and  a  new  Finance Act.  The  amendments  to  the 
2010  Mining  Act  increased  the  royalty  rate  applicable  to  metallic 
minerals  such  as  gold,  copper  and  silver  to  6%  (from  4%),  and 
the  new  Finance  Act  imposes  a  1%  clearing  fee  on  the  value  of 
all minerals exported from Tanzania from July 1, 2017. In January 
2018,  new  Mining  Regulations  were  announced  by  the  GoT 
introducing, among other things, local content requirements, export 
regulations  and  mineral  rights  regulations,  the  scope  and  effect 
of  which  remain  under  review.  Barrick  continued  to  monitor  the 
impact  of  new  legislation  in  light  of Acacia’s  Mineral  Development 
Agreements with the GoT. 

On  October  19,  2017,  Barrick  announced  that  it  had  agreed 
with  the  GoT  on  a  proposed  framework  for  a  new  partnership 
between Acacia and the GoT. Acacia did not participate directly in 
these  discussions  as  the  GoT  had  informed  Barrick  that  it  wished 
to continue dialogue solely with Barrick. Barrick and the GoT also 
agreed to form a working group that would focus on the resolution 

204

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsof outstanding tax claims against Acacia. Key terms of the proposed 
framework  announced  by  Barrick  and  the  GoT  included  (i)  the 
creation  of  a  new  Tanzanian  company  to  provide  management 
services  to  Acacia’s  Bulyanhulu,  Buzwagi  and  North  Mara  mines 
and all future operations in the country with key officers located in 
Tanzania and Tanzanian representation on the board of directors; (ii) 
maximization of local employment of Tanzanians and procurement 
of goods and services within Tanzania; (iii) economic benefits from 
Bulyanhulu,  Buzwagi  and  North  Mara  to  be  shared  on  a  50/50 
basis, with the GoT’s share delivered in the form of royalties, taxes 
and  a  16%  free  carry  interest  in  Acacia’s  Tanzanian  operations; 
and (iv) in support of the working group’s ongoing efforts to resolve 
outstanding  tax  claims,  Acacia  would  make  a  payment  of  $300 
million to the GoT, staged over time, on terms to be settled by the 
working group. Barrick and the GoT also reviewed the conditions for 
the lifting of the Ban.

On February 20, 2019, Barrick announced that it had arrived at  
a proposal with the GoT that set forth the commercial terms to resolve  
outstanding disputes concerning Acacia’s operations in Tanzania. 

On May 19, 2019, the GoT Negotiating Team wrote to Acacia’s 
three Tanzanian operating companies (the “TMCs”) to indicate that 
the  GoT  had  resolved  not  to  proceed  to  execute  final  agreements 
for  the  resolution  of  Acacia’s  disputes  if  Acacia  was  one  of  the 
counterparties to the agreements.

On  July  12,  2019, Acacia’s  North  Mara  mine  received  a  letter 
from the Mining Commission of the Tanzanian Ministry of Minerals 
informing  it  that  the  Mining  Commission  is  soon  to  conduct  
an  inspection  of  North  Mara’s  gold  production  (the  “No  Export 
Letter”).  The  No  Export  Letter  stated  that  export  permits  for  gold 
shipments  from  North  Mara  would  be  issued  following  completion 
of this inspection.

Following an investigation conducted by the Mining Commission 
on July 30 and 31, 2019, the North Mara mine received a letter from 
the  Mining  Commission  (the  “Inspection  Findings  Letter”)  stating 
that  it  believes  that  certain  provisions  of  the  Mining  Regulations, 
2010  were  violated  and  directing  the  North  Mara  mine  to  submit 
a  feasibility  study  report  and  current  mine  plan  for  its  approval  by 
August 16, 2019. The Inspection Findings Letter also authorized the 
resumption of gold exports from North Mara subject to its adherence 
to the export procedure.

On July 19, 2019, the Acacia Transaction Committee Directors 
and  Barrick  published  a  firm  offer  announcement  pursuant  to 
Rule  2.7  of  the  City  Code  on  Takeovers  and  Mergers  (“Rule  2.7 
Announcement”) announcing that they had reached agreement on 
the terms of a recommended final offer by Barrick for the ordinary 
share  capital  of Acacia  that  Barrick  did  not  already  own,  with  the 
belief  that  the  recommended  final  offer  would  enable  Barrick  to 
finalize  the  terms  of  a  full,  final  and  comprehensive  settlement  of 
all of Acacia’s existing disputes with the GoT. To facilitate this and 
in  anticipation  of  the  Rule  2.7  Announcement,  on  July  17,  2019, 
Acacia announced that Bulyanhulu Gold Mine Limited and Pangea 
Minerals Limited would immediately seek a stay of their international 
arbitration proceedings with the GoT. 

On  September  12,  2019,  the  High  Court  of  Justice  in  England 
and Wales made an order sanctioning the scheme of arrangement 
under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Scheme”), and on 
September 17, 2019, Barrick completed the acquisition of all of the 
shares of Acacia that the Company did not already own pursuant to 
the Scheme. Acacia ceased trading on the London Stock Exchange 
and  became  a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  Barrick  called  Barrick  
TZ Limited. 

On  October  20,  2019,  Barrick  announced  that  it  had  reached 
an agreement with the GoT to settle all disputes between the GoT 
and  the  mining  companies  formerly  operated  by  Acacia  but  now 
managed  by  Barrick.  The  final  agreements  were  submitted  to  the 
Tanzanian Attorney General for review and legalization. 

The  terms  of  the  signed  agreement  are  consistent  with  those 
previously  announced,  including  the  payment  of  $300  million 
to  settle  all  outstanding  tax  and  other  disputes  (the  “Settlement 
Payment”);  the  lifting  of  the  concentrate  export  ban;  the  sharing 
of  future  economic  benefits  from  the  mines  on  a  50/50  basis; 
and  a  dispute  resolution  mechanism  that  provides  for  binding 
international  arbitration.  The  50/50  division  of  economic  benefits 
will be maintained through an annual true-up mechanism, which will 
not account for the Settlement Payment. 

The  Settlement  Payment  will  be  paid  in  installments,  with  an 
initial payment of $100 million which was paid to the GoT following 
the  resumption  of  mineral  concentrate  exports.  Five  subsequent 
annual payments of $40 million each will be made, starting on the 
first  anniversary  of  the  fulfillment  of  all  conditions  of  the  signed 
agreement, subject to certain cash flow conditions. 

On  January  24,  2020,  Barrick  announced  that  the  Company 
had  ratified  the  creation  of Twiga  (“Twiga”)  at  a  signing  ceremony 
with  the  President  of  Tanzania,  formalizing  the  establishment  of 
a  joint  venture  between  Barrick  and  the  GoT  and  resolution  of  all 
outstanding  disputes  between  Barrick  and  the  GoT,  including  the 
lifting of the previous concentrate export ban, effective immediately. 
The  GoT  received  a  free  carried  shareholding  of  16%  in  each  of 
the Tanzania mines (Bulyanhulu, Buzwagi and North Mara), a 16% 
interest in the shareholder loans owed by the operating companies 
and  will  receive  its  half  of  the  economic  benefits  from  taxes, 
royalties,  clearing  fees  and  participation  in  all  cash  distributions 
made  by  the  mines  and  Twiga,  after  the  recoupment  of  capital 
investments. Twiga will provide management services to the mines.
In October 2020, Twiga paid a maiden interim cash dividend of 

$250 million, of which $40 million was paid to the GoT.

Barrick  and  the  GoT  continue  efforts  to  fulfill  their  respective 
obligations  to  satisfy  all  conditions  of  the  signed  agreement, 
primarily  with  respect  to  the  execution  and  delivery  of  formal 
termination documents for the settlement of all outstanding disputes 
between the two parties.

See  note  21  of  these  Financial  Statements  for  impairment 

losses/reversals arising from these matters.

Tanzanian Revenue Authority Assessments
The Tanzanian Revenue Authority (“TRA”) issued a number of tax 
assessments  to  Acacia  related  to  past  taxation  years  from  2002 
onwards. Acacia  believed  that  the  majority  of  these  assessments 
were  incorrect  and  filed  objections  and  appeals  accordingly  in  an 
attempt to resolve these matters by means of discussions with the 
TRA  or  through  the  Tanzanian  appeals  process.  Overall,  it  was 
Acacia’s assessment that the relevant assessments and claims by 
the TRA were without merit. 

The  claims  include  an  assessment  issued  to  Acacia  in  the 
amount  of  $41.3  million  for  withholding  tax  on  certain  historic 
offshore  dividend  payments  paid  by  Acacia  (then  African  Barrick 
Gold  plc)  to  its  shareholders  from  2010  to  2013. Acacia  appealed 
this  assessment  on  the  substantive  grounds  that,  as  an  English 
incorporated company, it was not resident in Tanzania for taxation 
purposes.  In  August  2020,  the  Tanzanian  Court  of  Appeal  found 
African  Barrick  Gold  plc  (now  called  Barrick  TZ  Limited)  to  be  
tax  resident  in  Tanzania  upholding  an  earlier  decision  from  the 
Tanzania  Revenue  Authority,  and  that  as  a  result,  withholding 
tax  was  payable  on  the  dividends  of  $41.3  million,  plus  accrued 
interest,  previously  declared  and  paid  between  2010  to  2013, 
inclusive. During October 2020, Barrick TZ Limited filed a motion for 
the Court of Appeal to review this decision with written submissions 
following in December 2020. No date has been set for the Court of 
Appeal to review its decision. 

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 205

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsthe  Chilean 

to  approximately  $1  billion 

Internal  Revenue  Service  (“Chilean 
in  outstanding 

Zaldívar Chilean Tax Assessment 
On  August  28,  2019,  Barrick’s  Chilean  subsidiary  that  holds  
the  Company’s  interest  in  the  Zaldívar  mine,  Compañía  Minera 
Zaldívar  Limitada  (“CMZ”),  received  notice  of  a  tax  assessment  
IRS”) 
from 
amounting 
taxes,  
including  interest  and  penalties  (the  “Zaldívar  Tax  Assessment”). 
The Zaldívar Tax Assessment primarily claims that CMZ improperly 
claimed  a  deduction  relating  to  a  loss  on  an  intercompany 
transaction  prior  to  recognizing  and  offsetting  a  capital  gain  on  
the  sale  of  a  50%  interest  by  CMZ  in  the  Zaldívar  mine  to  
Antofagasta  in  2015.  CMZ  filed  an  administrative  appeal  with  the 
Chilean  IRS  on  October  14,  2019.  Following  initial  meetings  with 
CMZ,  the  Chilean  IRS  agreed  with  CMZ’s  position  and  reduced 
the  Assessment  to  $678  million  (including  interest  and  penalties 
as at December 31, 2021). CMZ will continue discussions with the 
Chilean IRS, prior to the authority’s final decision. 

On  March  17,  2020,  Compañía  Minera  Zaldívar  Limitada 
(“CMZ”),  Barrick’s  Chilean  subsidiary  that  holds  the  Company’s 
interest  in  the  Zaldívar  mine,  filed  a  claim  against  the  Chilean  
IRS  at  the  Tax  Court  of  Coquimbo  (the  “Tax  Court”)  to  nullify  
the  tax  assessment  relating  to  the  sale  of  a  50%  interest  by 
CMZ  in  the  Zaldívar  mine  to  Antofagasta  in  2015  (the  “2015  Tax 
Assessment”). The Chilean IRS filed their response to CMZ’s claim 
on April 13, 2020. 

On  May  22,  2020,  the  Tax  Court  held  a  conciliation  hearing 
which  did  not  result  in  the  resolution  of  the  matter. The Tax  Court 
then  granted  a  joint  proposal  from  CMZ  and  the  Chilean  IRS  to 
suspend  the  legal  case  until  October  2020  while  settlement 
discussions continue. 

In April 2020, the Chilean IRS initiated an audit of CMZ for 2016 
relating to the same claims included in the 2015 Tax Assessment. 
This audit resulted in a new tax assessment against CMZ (the “2016 
Tax Assessment”). On September 9, 2020, CMZ filed a claim at the 
Tax Court to nullify the 2016 Tax Assessment and the Chilean IRS 
filed its response on October 7, 2020. 
On September 29, 2020, the Tax Court approved CMZ’s request to 
consolidate its challenges to the 2015 and 2016 Tax Assessments 
(collectively, the “Zaldívar Tax Assessments”) in a single proceeding. 
Court  proceedings  have  been  delayed  as  a  result  of  the  Covid-19 
pandemic, but are expected to commence in March 2022.

The  Company  believes  that  the  Zaldívar  Tax  Assessments 
are without merit and intends to vigorously defend its position. No 
amounts have been recorded for any potential liability arising from 
the Zaldívar Tax Assessments as the Company cannot reasonably 
predict the outcome. 

Massawa Senegalese Tax Dispute 
The  Company  received  a  Notice  for  Reassessment,  dated  May  7, 
2020, from the Senegalese Tax Authority (“SRA”) asserting capital 
gains and withholding tax liabilities and penalties of approximately 
$228 million (as calculated at December 31, 2020) arising from the 
disposal  of  the  subsidiary  that  held  the  Company’s  interest  in  the 
Massawa  project  in  March  2020.  The  amount  was  subsequently 
reduced to $216 million (as calculated at December 31, 2020) in a 
Confirmation of Reassessment dated July 13, 2020. The Company 
has  reviewed  the  Notice  for  Reassessment  and  the  Confirmation 
of Reassessment and has concluded that the proposed tax claims 
are  without  merit  as  Massawa’s  mining  convention  with  the  State 
of  Senegal  specifically  precludes  them.  The  Company  submitted 
its responses to the SRA on June 5, 2020 and September 2, 2020.

Further TRA assessments were issued to Acacia in January 2016 
in the amount of $500.7 million, based on an allegation that Acacia 
was resident in Tanzania for corporate and dividend withholding tax 
purposes. The corporate tax assessments were levied on certain of 
Acacia’s net profits before tax. Acacia appealed these assessments 
at  the  TRA  Board  level.  Acacia’s  substantive  grounds  of  appeal 
were  based  on  the  correct  interpretation  of  Tanzanian  permanent 
establishment principles and law, relevant to a non-resident English 
incorporated company. 

In  addition,  the TRA  issued  adjusted  tax  assessments  totaling 
approximately  $190  billion  for  alleged  unpaid  taxes,  interest  and 
penalties,  apparently  issued  in  respect  of  alleged  and  disputed 
under-declared  export  revenues,  and  appearing  to  follow  on  from 
the  announced  findings  of  the  First  and  Second  Presidential 
Committees.  For  more  information  about  these  adjusted  tax 
assessments, see “Tanzania – Concentrate Export Ban and Related 
Disputes” above. 

On  October  20,  2019,  Barrick  announced  that  it  had  reached 
an agreement with the GoT to settle all disputes between the GoT 
and  the  mining  companies  formerly  operated  by  Acacia  but  now 
managed  by  Barrick.  The  final  agreements  were  submitted  to  the 
Tanzanian Attorney General for review and legalization. 

On  January  24,  2020,  Barrick  announced  that  the  Company 
had  ratified  the  creation  of  Twiga  Minerals  Corporation  at  a 
signing  ceremony  with  the  President  of  Tanzania,  formalizing 
the  establishment  of  a  joint  venture  between  Barrick  and  the 
Government  of  Tanzania  (“GoT”)  and  resolution  of  all  outstanding 
disputes  between  Barrick  and  the  GoT,  including  the  lifting  of  the 
previous  concentrate  export  ban,  effective  immediately.  The  GoT 
will  receive  a  free  carried  shareholding  of  16%  in  each  of  the 
former Acacia  mines  (Bulyanhulu,  Buzwagi  and  North  Mara),  and 
will  receive  its  half  of  the  economic  benefits  from  taxes,  royalties, 
clearing fees and participation in all cash distributions made by the 
mines and Twiga, after the recoupment of capital investments. 

The  terms  of  the  signed  agreement  are  consistent  with  
those  previously  announced,  including  the  Settlement  Payment;  
the  lifting  of  the  concentrate  export  ban;  the  sharing  of  future 
economic benefits from the mines on a 50/50 basis; and a dispute 
resolution  mechanism 
international 
arbitration.  The  50/50  division  of  economic  benefits  will  be 
maintained  through  an  annual  true-up  mechanism,  which  will  not 
account for the Settlement Payment. 

that  provides 

for  binding 

The  Settlement  Payment  will  be  paid  in  installments,  with  an 
initial payment of $100 million which was paid to the GoT following 
the  resumption  of  mineral  concentrate  exports.  Five  subsequent 
annual payments of $40 million each will be made, starting on the 
first  anniversary  of  the  fulfillment  of  all  conditions  of  the  signed 
agreement, subject to certain cash flow conditions.

All  of  the  tax  disputes  with  the TRA  were  considered  resolved 
as  part  of  the  settlement  with  the  GoT  described  above  under 
“Tanzania  –  Concentrate  Export  Ban  and  Related  Disputes.” 
As  noted  above,  Barrick  and  the  GoT  continue  efforts  to  fulfill 
their  respective  obligations  to  satisfy  all  conditions  of  the  signed 
agreement,  primarily  with  respect  to  the  execution  and  delivery  of 
formal termination documents for the settlement of all outstanding 
disputes between the two parties.

206

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsOn March 10, 2021, the Company filed an application with the 
International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) in Paris in accordance 
with  the  Mining  Convention  for  Gold  and  Related  Substances, 
dated  November  24,  2003,  pertaining  to  the  Senegal  mining  code 
between  the  Government  of  the  Republic  of  Senegal  and  the 
Company. On July 16, 2021, the ICC confirmed the appointment of 
three arbitrators to the tribunal.

On  September,  21  2021,  the  Company  and  the  Government 
of  the  Republic  of  Senegal  settled  the  Massawa  tax  dispute.  On 
December 16, 2021, the ICC confirmed that both parties had agreed 
to withdraw from the arbitration and the matter is now settled.

The settlement amount has been paid by the Company and no 

provision has been retained for this matter.

Kibali Customs Dispute
At the end of January and in early February 2022, Kibali Goldmines 
SA, which owns and operates the Kibali gold mine in the Democratic 
Republic  of  the  Congo,  received  fifteen  claims  from  the  Direction 
Générale des Douanes et Accises (“Customs Authority”) concerning 
customs  duties.  The  Customs  Authority  claims  that  incorrect 
import  duty  tariffs  have  been  applied  to  the  importation  of  certain 
consumables  and  equipment  for  the  Kibali  gold  mine.  In  addition, 
they  claim  that  the  exemption  available  to  Kibali  Goldmines  SA, 
which was granted in relation to the original mining lease, no longer 
applies.  Finally,  the  Customs  Authority  claims  that  a  service  fee 
paid on the exportation of gold was paid to the wrong government 
body. The claims, including substantial penalties and interest, total 
$339 million. 

The Company has examined the Customs Authority claims and 
concluded  that  they  are  without  merit,  as  they  seek  to  challenge 
established  customs  practices  which  have  been  accepted  by  the 
Customs  Authority  for  many  years  and,  where  relevant,  are  in 
line  with  ministerial  instruction  letters.  No  amounts  have  been 
recorded for any potential liability arising from these claims as the 
Company  cannot  reasonably  predict  the  outcome.  The  Company 
will vigorously defend its position that the Customs Authority claims 
are unfounded.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 207

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsShareholder Information

Shares are traded on two stock exchanges

New York
Toronto

TICKER SYMBOL
NYSE: GOLD 
TSX: ABX

2021 DIVIDEND PER SHARE
US$0.37 (paid in respect of the 2021 financial year)

COMMON SHARES

(millions)

Outstanding at December 31, 2021

Weighted average in 2021

NUMBER OF REGISTERED SHAREHOLDERS AT  
DECEMBER 31, 2021
15,659

Basic

Fully diluted

1,779

1,779

1,779

CLOSING PRICE OF SHARES

December 31, 2021

NYSE

TSX

US$19.00

C$24.05

The  Company’s  shares  were  split  on  a  two-for-one  basis  in  1987, 
1989 and 1993.

VOLUME OF SHARES TRADED

(millions) 

NYSE

TSX

2021

4,395

956

2020

4,704

1,285

SHARE TRADING INFORMATION

New York Stock Exchange

Quarter

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Toronto Stock Exchange

Quarter

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Share Volume  
(millions)

2021

1,231

1,027

1,041

1,096

4,395

2020
1,200

1,213

1,177

1,114

4,704

Share Volume  
(millions)

2021

2020

299

255

190

212

956

356

325

310

294

1,285

High

2021

US$24.95

2020
US$22.57

25.37

22.30

21.19

28.50

31.22

29.60

Low

2021

US$18.64

2020
US$12.65

19.94

17.56

17.27

18.26

25.87

22.22

High

2021

2020

C$31.85

C$29.93

30.65

27.97

26.66

40.13

41.09

38.76

Low

2021

2020

C$23.63

C$17.52

25.08

22.30

22.33

25.86

34.36

28.60

208

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Shareholder Information

PERFORMANCE DIVIDEND POLICY 
At the February 15, 2022 meeting, the Board of Directors approved 
a  performance  dividend  policy  that  will  enhance  the  return  to 
shareholders  when  the  Company’s  liquidity  is  strong.  In  addition 
to  our  base  dividend,  the  amount  of  the  performance  dividend  on 
a quarterly basis will be based on the amount of cash, net of debt, 
on  our  consolidated  balance  sheet  at  the  end  of  each  quarter  as 
per the schedule below. This performance dividend calculation will 
commence  after  our  March  31,  2022  consolidated  balance  sheet, 
with a potential payment in the second quarter of the year.

Performance 
Dividend 
Level

Level I

Level II

Level III

Level IV

Threshold 
Level

Net cash  
<$0

Net cash 
>$0 and 
<$0.5B

Net cash 
>$0.5B  
and <$1B
Net cash 
>$1B

Quarterly 
Base 
Dividend

$0.10 
per share

$0.10 
per share

Quarterly 
Performance 
Dividend

Quarterly 
Total 
Dividend

$0.00 
per share

$0.05 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.15 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.20 
per share

$0.10 
per share

$0.15 
per share

$0.25 
per share

The  declaration  and  payment  of  dividends  is  at  the  discretion  of 
the Board of Directors, and will depend on the company’s financial 
results,  cash  requirements,  future  prospects,  the  number  of 
outstanding common shares, and other factors deemed relevant by 
the Board.

DIVIDEND PAYMENTS
In  2020,  Barrick  paid  an  aggregate  cash  dividend  of  $0.31  per 
common share – $0.07 on March 16, $0.07 on June 15, $0.08 on 
September 15 and $0.09 on December 15.

In 2021, Barrick paid an aggregate cash dividend of $0.36 per 
common share – $0.09 on March 15, $0.09 on June 15, $0.09 on 
September 15 and $0.09 on December 15.

RETURN OF CAPITAL
At  the Annual  and  Special  Meeting  on  May  4,  2021,  shareholders 
approved  a  $750-million  return  of  capital  distribution.  This 
distribution  was  derived  from  a  portion  of  the  proceeds  from  the 
divestiture of Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines in November 2019 
and  from  other  recent  dispositions  made  by  Barrick  and  its  affiliates 
in  line  with  its  strategy  of  focusing  on  its  core  assets.  The  total 
return  of  capital  distribution  was  effected  in  three  equal  tranches 
of  $250  million.  The  first  tranche  was  paid  on  June  15,  2021,  
to  shareholders  of  record  at  the  close  of  business  on  May  28,  
2021.  The  second  tranche  was  paid  on  September  15,  2021,  to 

shareholders of record at the close of business on August 31, 2021. 
The third tranche was paid on December 15, 2021, to shareholders 
of record at the close of business on November 30, 2021.

FORM 40-F
The  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  40-F  is  filed  with  the  
United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  This  report 
is  available  on  Barrick’s  website  www.barrick.com  and  will  be 
made  available  to  shareholders,  without  charge,  upon  written 
request  to  the  Secretary  of  the  Company  at  the  Head  Office  at 
corporatesecretary@barrick.com or at 416-861-9911.

SHAREHOLDER CONTACTS
Shareholders  are  welcome  to  contact  the  Investor  Relations 
Department 
the  Company  at  
for  general 
investor@barrick.com or at 416-861-9911.

information  on 

For more information on such matters as share transfers, dividend 
cheques and change of address, inquiries should be directed to the 
Company’s Transfer Agents.

TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS
TSX Trust Company
P.O. Box 700, Postal Station B
Montreal, Quebec, Canada  H3B 3K3
or
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 – 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY  11219, USA

Telephone: 1-800-387-0825 
Toll-free throughout North America 
Fax: 1-888-249-6189
Email: shareholderinquiries@tmx.com  
Website: www.tsxtrust.com

AUDITORS
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Toronto, Canada

ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on  
Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 10:00 am (Toronto time). 

Please visit www.barrick.com/investors/AGM for meeting details.

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 209

Cautionary Statement on  
Forward-Looking Information

“goal”, 

“budget”, 

“estimate”, 

“continue”, 

Certain  information  contained  or  incorporated  by  reference  in  this 
Annual  Report  2021,  including  any  information  as  to  our  strategy, 
projects,  plans  or  future  financial  or  operating  performance, 
constitutes  “forward-looking  statements”.  All  statements,  other 
than  statements  of  historical  fact,  are  forward-looking  statements. 
The  words  “believe”,  “expect”,  “anticipate”,  “vision”,  “target”, 
“plan”,  “opportunities”,  “objective”,  “assumption”,  “intend”,  “aims” 
“project”, 
“potential”, 
“strategy”,  “prospective”,  “following”,  “future”,  “may”,  “will”,  “can”, 
“could”,  “would”  and  similar  expressions  identify  forward-looking 
statements. In particular, this Annual Report 2021 contains forward-
looking  statements  including,  without  limitation,  with  respect  to: 
Barrick’s goal to be the world’s most valued gold and copper mining 
business; Barrick’s forward-looking production guidance; estimates 
of future cost of sales per ounce for gold and per pound for copper, 
total cash costs per ounce and C1 cash costs per pound, and all-in 
sustaining  costs  per  ounce/pound;  cash  flow  forecasts,  including 
Barrick’s  forecasted  5-year  attributable  free  cash  flow;  projected 
capital,  operating  and  exploration  expenditures,  including  with 
respect to Barrick’s 5-year plans for the Group and each of its North 
America,  Latin  America  and  Asia  Pacific  and  Africa  and  Middle 
East regions and Barrick’s 10-year production profile; mine life and 
production  rates;  Barrick’s  engagement  with  local  communities  to 
manage the Covid-19 pandemic; potential mineralization and metal 
or  mineral  recoveries;  our  ability  to  identify,  invest  in  and  develop 
potential  Tier  One  assets;  our  future  plans,  growth  potential, 
financial  strength,  investments  and  overall  strategy,  including  with 
respect  to  dispositions  of  non-core  assets,  maximizing  the  long-
term  value  of  our  strategic  copper  business,  and  our  participation 
in  the  future  consolidation  of  the  gold  industry;  our  plans  and 
expected  completion  and  benefits  of  our  growth  and  capital 
projects,  including  the  Goldrush  Project,  Turquoise  Ridge  Third 
Shaft, Pueblo Viejo plant expansion and mine life extension project, 
Bulyanhulu  production  ramp-up,  and  Veladero  Phase  7  leach  pad 
and  power  transmission  projects;  our  ability  to  convert  resources 
into reserves; the potential for North Mara and Bulyanhulu to reach 
Tier One status as a combined complex; Barrick’s global exploration 
strategy  and  planned  exploration  activities  in  each  of  its  North 
America, Latin America and Asia Pacific and Africa and Middle East 
regions;  the  partnership  between  Barrick  and  the  Government  of 
Tanzania; the timeline for execution and effectiveness of definitive 
agreements  and  formation  of  a  new  joint  venture  to  implement 
the  Commencement Agreement  between  Papua  New  Guinea  and 
Barrick  Niugini  Limited  and  Barrick’s  expected  change  in  equity 
interest  in  Porgera;  the  duration  of  the  temporary  suspension  of 
operations  at  Porgera  and  timeline  to  recommence  operations, 
including the potential to restart operations in July 2022; our ability 
to establish a mutually beneficial partnership with the Government 
of Pakistan and local stakeholders to develop the Reko Diq project; 
asset sales, joint ventures and partnerships, including the expected 
benefits  of  the  South Arturo  asset  exchange,  the  sale  of  Lagunas 
Norte, and the disposition of other non-core assets; our sustainability 
strategy  and  performance  as  measured  by  our  Sustainability 
Scorecard;  Barrick’s  strategy,  plans,  targets  and  goals  in  respect 
of  environmental  and  social  governance  issues,  including  its 
biodiversity action plans, grievance and resettlement management, 
and  economic  and  social  development  priorities  within  our  host 
communities,  such  as  Covid-19  vaccine  and  disease  prevention 
programs,  local  hiring,  procurement,  training  and  community 
development  initiatives;  Barrick’s  greenhouse  gas  emissions  targets 
and associated emissions reduction initiatives, including our plans 

to  address  Scope  3  emissions;  our  digital  innovation  initiatives; 
plans to repurchase Barrick shares pursuant to the share buyback 
program,  which  does  not  obligate  the  Company  to  acquire  any 
particular number of common shares and which may be suspended 
or discontinued at any time at the Company’s discretion; Barrick’s 
performance  dividend  policy,  including  the  criteria  for  payment  of 
dividends;  and  expectations  regarding  future  price  assumptions, 
financial performance and other outlook or guidance.

Forward-looking  statements  are  necessarily  based  upon  a 
number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates 
and  assumptions  related  to  the  factors  set  forth  below  that,  while 
considered  reasonable  by  the  Company  as  at  the  date  of  this 
Annual  Report  2021  in  light  of  management’s  experience  and 
perception  of  current  conditions  and  expected  developments, 
are  inherently  subject  to  significant  business,  economic  and 
competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown 
factors  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially  from  those 
projected  in  the  forward-looking  statements  and  undue  reliance 
should  not  be  placed  on  such  statements  and  information.  Such 
factors  include,  but  are  not  limited  to:  fluctuations  in  the  spot  and 
forward price of gold, copper or certain other commodities (such as 
silver, diesel fuel, natural gas and electricity); risks associated with 
projects  in  the  early  stages  of  evaluation  and  for  which  additional 
engineering  and  other  analysis  is  required;  risks  related  to  the 
possibility that future exploration results will not be consistent with 
the Company’s expectations, that quantities or grades of reserves 
will  be  diminished,  and  that  resources  may  not  be  converted  to 
reserves; risks associated with the fact that certain of the initiatives 
described in this Annual Report 2021 are still in the early stages and 
may  not  materialize;  changes  in  mineral  production  performance, 
exploitation  and  exploration  successes;  risks  that  exploration 
data may be incomplete and considerable additional work may be 
required  to  complete  further  evaluation,  including  but  not  limited 
to drilling, engineering and socioeconomic studies and investment; 
the  speculative  nature  of  mineral  exploration  and  development; 
lack  of  certainty  with  respect  to  foreign  legal  systems,  corruption 
and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; changes 
in  national  and  local  government  legislation,  taxation,  controls  or 
regulations  and/or  changes  in  the  administration  of  laws,  policies 
and  practices;  expropriation  or  nationalization  of  property  and 
political  or  economic  developments  in  Canada,  the  United  States 
or other countries in which Barrick does or may carry on business 
in  the  future;  risks  relating  to  political  instability  in  certain  of  the 
jurisdictions in which Barrick operates; timing of receipt of, or failure 
to  comply  with,  necessary  permits  and  approvals,  including  the 
issuance  of  a  Record  of  Decision  for  the  Goldrush  Project;  non-
renewal  of  key  licenses  by  governmental  authorities,  including 
non-renewal  of  Porgera’s  special  mining  lease;  failure  to  comply 
with  environmental  and  health  and  safety  laws  and  regulations; 
contests  over  title  to  properties,  particularly  title  to  undeveloped 
properties,  or  over  access  to  water,  power  and  other  required 
infrastructure;  the  liability  associated  with  risks  and  hazards  in 
the  mining  industry,  and  the  ability  to  maintain  insurance  to  cover 
such losses; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme 
weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; 
damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived 
occurrence  of  any  number  of  events,  including  negative  publicity 
with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or 
dealings with community groups, whether true or not; risks related to 
operations near communities that may regard Barrick’s operations 
as being detrimental to them; litigation and legal and administrative 

210

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

Many  of  these  uncertainties  and  contingencies  can  affect  our 
actual  results  and  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially 
from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements 
made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-
looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of 
the  forward-looking  statements  made  in  this  Annual  Report  2021 
are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is 
made  to  the  most  recent  Form  40-F/Annual  Information  Form  on 
file  with  the  SEC  and  Canadian  provincial  securities  regulatory 
authorities  for  a  more  detailed  discussion  of  some  of  the  factors 
underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect 
Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-
looking  statements  contained  in  this  Annual  Report  2021.  We 
disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-
looking  statements  whether  as  a  result  of  new  information,  future 
events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

proceedings;  operating  or  technical  difficulties  in  connection  with 
mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges, 
tailings  dam  and  storage  facilities  failures,  and  disruptions  in  the 
maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information 
technology  systems;  increased  costs,  delays,  suspensions  and 
technical  challenges  associated  with  the  construction  of  capital 
projects;  risks  associated  with  working  with  partners  in  jointly 
controlled assets; risks related to disruption of supply routes which 
may cause delays in construction and mining activities; risk of loss 
due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; risks 
associated  with  artisanal  and  illegal  mining;  risks  associated  with 
Barrick’s  infrastructure,  information  technology  systems  and  the 
implementation  of  Barrick’s  technological  initiatives;  the  impact  of 
global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and 
the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash 
flows; the impact of inflation; adverse changes in our credit ratings; 
fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest 
rates;  risks  arising  from  holding  derivative  instruments  (such  as 
credit  risk,  market  liquidity  risk  and  mark-to-market  risk);  risks 
related  to  the  demands  placed  on  the  Company’s  management, 
the  ability  of  management  to  implement  its  business  strategy  and 
enhanced political risk in certain jurisdictions; uncertainty whether 
some or all of Barrick’s targeted investments and projects will meet 
the Company’s capital allocation objectives and internal hurdle rate; 
whether  benefits  expected  from  recent  transactions  are  realized; 
business  opportunities  that  may  be  presented  to,  or  pursued  by, 
the  Company;  our  ability  to  successfully  integrate  acquisitions  or 
complete  divestitures;  risks  related  to  competition  in  the  mining 
industry;  employee  relations  including  loss  of  key  employees; 
availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and 
labor;  risks  associated  with  diseases,  epidemics  and  pandemics, 
including  the  effects  and  potential  effects  of  the  global  Covid-19 
pandemic; risks related to the failure of internal controls; and risks 
related  to  the  impairment  of  the  Company’s  goodwill  and  assets. 
Barrick  also  cautions  that  its  2022  guidance  may  be  impacted 
by  the  unprecedented  business  and  social  disruption  caused  by 
the  spread  of  Covid-19.  In  addition,  there  are  risks  and  hazards 
associated  with  the  business  of  mineral  exploration,  development 
and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, 
unusual  or  unexpected  formations,  pressures,  cave-ins,  flooding 
and  gold  bullion,  copper  cathode  or  gold  or  copper  concentrate 
losses (and  the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain 
insurance, to cover these risks).

Barrick Gold Corporation   |    Annual Report 2021 211

Corporate Office and 
General Inquiries

Barrick Gold Corporation
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1
Canada

Telephone: +1 416 861-9911
Toll Free (North America): 1-800-720-7415

www.barrick.com

212

Annual Report 2021   |    Barrick Gold Corporation

I
I

B
B
A
A
R
R
R
R
C
C
K
K
G
G
O
O
L
L
D
D
C
C
O
O
R
R
P
P
O
O
R
R
A
A
T
T
O
O
N
N

I
I

Annual  Report  2021

Building our future

|
|

A
A
n
n
n
n
u
u
a
a

l
l

R
R
e
e
p
p
o
o
r
r
t
t

2
2
0
0
2
2
1
1

|
|

B
B
u
u

i
i
l
l

i
i

d
d
n
n
g
g

o
o
u
u
r
r

f
f

u
u
t
t
u
u
r
r
e
e

BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION

Corporate Office:
TD Canada Trust Tower
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
Toronto, Canada M5J 2S1

Tel:  +1 416 861-9911
Toll-free throughout North America:
1 800 720-7415

www.barrick.com

Connect with us