More annual reports from Bassett Furniture Industries:
2021 ReportPeers and competitors of Bassett Furniture Industries:
Bassett Furniture Industries2 10 4A n n u Al R e p oRt “Our model has been painstakingly and purposefully crafted over 15 years and has matured into a proposition that is being increasingly embraced by consumers and has the potential to generate attractive financial returns in the years to come.” Rob Spilman, President and CEO, Bassett Furniture To Our Shareholders, I am particularly pleased to write our annual letter to shareholders this year. Many people have worked very hard over a number of years to remake Bassett Furniture into the vibrant home furnishings enterprise that it is today. Although our mission to grow the company’s value is by no means complete, it is gratifying to report the progress that was made in 2014 and explain why we look to the future with optimism. Despite having one less week on the fiscal calendar than in 2013, consolidated net sales for 2014 grew by 6.0% to $341 million, thanks in large part to particularly strong revenue growth during the final six months of the year. Net income grew by 82% to $9.3 million. If nothing else, the past several years have taught us that neither Bassett nor any other company in our sector can thrive during severe downturns in the world economy. Coming out of the Great Recession our industry has undoubtedly benefited from improving economic conditions. But we believe that Bassett’s recent success is attributable to more than increasing favorability in the macro environment. Our model has been painstakingly and purposefully crafted over 15 years and has matured into a proposition that is being increasingly embraced by consumers and has the potential to generate attractive financial returns in the years to come. For a small public company, our primary business platform is relatively complex. Within the sum of the parts of this complexity, however, lies the unique selling proposition that powers our business. Although various industry competitors claim to offer free in-home design services in their stores, very few embrace the strategy to drive their sales day in and day out. This requires a constant commitment to recruiting, training, and accountability that has become ingrained in our culture over many years. Without this discipline, a design culture will not thrive. Supporting our designers is technology that communicates the infinite custom options that are available in our product line and allows the consumer to visualize our furniture in their homes. In 2013 we finished a two year project to install a new network wide corporate retail operating system that is giving our management better insight into the key metrics of our operation. Currently, we are arming our design staffs with digital tablets to assist the sales process both in-store and in-home. Coupled with our bassettfurniture.com website, our technology assets seamlessly and efficiently navigate the consumer through their personalized Bassett design solution. Once the customer’s order is placed with our factories, our manufacturing facilities efficiently produce custom products that are specifically made for each client. In short, we do not build furniture to reside in a warehouse, we build it for our customers’ homes and we get it there in 30 days or less. Our partnership with Zenith Transportation is the final piece of the puzzle that enables us to make this happen every day. Zenith operates regional warehouses in eight states and a network of local home delivery centers that provide white glove delivery service and the high level of professionalism that our customers deserve. Custom Leather Newton, NC Custom Dining Martinsville, VA Consolidated Sales These capabilities come to life in our network of 60 corporately owned and 34 licensed Bassett Home Furnishings stores located in 28 states across the U.S. Six new corporate stores were opened in 2014. Building on last year, our 51 comparable corporate stores (those open at least 12 months) generated a best ever operating profit of $2.2 million. We plan to open two new stores in the Los Angeles market and another in the Washington, D.C. area in 2015. Also, we will relocate two Texas stores early in the year and we are in negotiations for several additional locations which may or may not come to pass depending on the ultimate terms of the leases. Meanwhile, our wholesale volume outside of our stores has doubled in the past four years as we have leveraged our selling strategy to grow our 75 Bassett Design Centers (BDC). Located within independently owned general furniture stores, our BDCs typically appeal to upscale retailers that utilize our merchandising programs to differentiate their stores in their local markets. $350,000 2011 2010 $200,000 $225,000 $250,000 $275,000 $300,000 $325,000 $235mm $253mm Looking ahead, our focus will largely center on wholesale revenue growth that we plan to achieve on several fronts. Accompanying recent the the debut of i m p r o v e d Bassettfurniture.com website was the late December launch of Bassett Baby and Kids. This effort is intended to leverage our 70 year history in the juvenile and youth furniture category and will initially be solely available on our website and in certain Bassett Home Furnishings retail stores. Another important new program for 2015 will be the birth of “Bench Made”, an American handmade dining program that will begin to grace retail showrooms in early spring. Partnering with nearby hardwood component manufacturers, we will prepare, distress, finish and assemble an assortment of solid maple tables and chairs in a newly renovated Bassett-owned facility located in Bassett, Virginia - a true startup. Finally, we are about to embark upon the largest makeover of our imported wood product assortment in recent memory. Months in the making, these new products have been carefully architected by our merchants, designers, engineers and finishing technicians to achieve the upscale casual vibe that we believe speaks to the Bassett consumer today. These new products have been planned to hit our stores in waves coinciding with key holiday selling periods throughout 2015. In association with this aggressive level of activity there are significant startup expenses that will be incurred over the course of 2015 that must be absorbed. Given the 11% compounded annual growth rate that we have posted over the past four years, we believe that the operational and capital investments required to support our retail expansion and the extension of our product assortment are prudent strategies for growth and will reward Bassett shareholders in the years to come. $340mm $321mm Finally, we plan to continue to allocate capital to grow our business and to further reward our shareholders. In addition to opening our new stores in 2014, we expanded our Martinsville, Virginia table plant, made improvements to our Newton, N.C. upholstery manufacturing complex, and further upgraded our website. In all, we invested about $18 million in the business in 2014 and we plan to dedicate a similar amount We in 2015. those balanced by investments paying $5.2 million of dividends to our shareholders and retiring $5.6 million of our common stock over the course of the year. While doing so, our balance sheet remained strong with $50 million of cash investments due in large part to the generation of $30 million of operating cash. 2013 2014 $269mm 2012 As always, I want to thank our shareholders, associates, and our Board of Directors for their support of Bassett this past year. Robert H. Spilman, Jr. President & CEO FINANCIAL SUMMARY Fiscal Years Ended November INCOME STATEMENT DATA 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Net Sales Income (loss) From Operations Net Income (loss) $340,738 15,131 9,299 $321,286 10,005 5,096 $269,672 5,080 26,713 $253,208 (19,857) 55,342 $235,254 (4,199) (2,002) PER SHARE DATA Diluted Income Cash Dividends Per Share Book Value Per Share BALANCE SHEET DATA Cash & Cash Equivalents Investments Total Assets Long-Term Debt Stockholders’ Equity $ 0.87 0.48 14.95 $ 0.47 0.42 14.50 $ 2.41 1.45 14.51 $ 4.79 0.60 13.44 $ (0.17) - 9.20 $ 26,673 23,125 240,746 1,902 156,832 $ 12,733 28,125 225,849 2,467 157,409 $ 45,566 - 227,180 3,053 157,280 $ 69,601 2,939 223,174 3,662 152,435 $ 11,071 - 197,317 4,295 106,305 Dollars in thousands except per share amounts Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Overview Bassett is a leading retailer, manufacturer and marketer of branded home furnishings. Our products are sold primarily through a network of Company-owned and licensee-owned branded stores under the Bassett Home Furnishings (“BHF”) name, with additional distribution through other wholesale channels including multi-line furniture stores, many of which feature Bassett galleries or design centers, specialty stores and mass merchants. We were founded in 1902 and incorporated under the laws of Virginia in 1930. Our rich 112-year history has instilled the principles of quality, value, and integrity in everything that we do, while simultaneously providing us with the expertise to respond to ever-changing consumer tastes and to meet the demands of a global economy. With 94 BHF stores at November 29, 2014, we have leveraged our strong brand name in furniture into a network of corporate and licensed stores that focus on providing consumers with a friendly environment for buying furniture and accessories. We created our store program in 1997 to provide a single source home furnishings retail store that provides a unique combination of stylish, quality furniture and accessories with a high level of customer service. The store features custom order furniture ready for delivery in less than 30 days, more than 1,000 upholstery fabrics, free in-home design visits, and coordinated decorating accessories. We believe that our capabilities in custom upholstery have become unmatched in recent years. Our manufacturing team takes great pride in the breadth of its options, the precision of its craftsmanship, and the speed of its delivery. The selling philosophy in the stores is based on building strong long-term relationships with each customer. Sales people are referred to as Design Consultants and are each trained to evaluate customer needs and provide comprehensive solutions for their home decor. We continue to strengthen the sales and design talent within our Company-owned retail stores. Our Design Consultants undergo extensive Design Certification training. This training has strengthened their skills related to our house call and design business, and is intended to increase business with our most valuable customers. In order to reach markets that cannot be effectively served by our retail store network, we also distribute our products through other wholesale channels including multi-line furniture stores, many of which feature Bassett galleries or design centers, specialty stores and mass merchants. We use a network of over 25 independent sales representatives who have stated geographical territories. These sales representatives are compensated based on a standard commission rate. We believe this blended strategy provides us the greatest ability to effectively distribute our products throughout the United States and ultimately gain market share. In September of 2011, we announced the formation of a strategic partnership with HGTV (Home and Garden Television), a division of Scripps Networks, LLC., which combines our 112 year heritage in the furniture industry with the penetration of 96 million households in the United States that HGTV enjoys today. As part of this alliance, the in-store design centers have been co-branded with HGTV to more forcefully market the concept of a “home makeover”, an important point of differentiation for our stores that also mirrors much of the programming content on the HGTV network. We believe the new co-branded design centers coupled with the targeted national advertising on HGTV have played a key role in our improved comparable store sales since their introduction following the third quarter of 2012. The following table summarizes the changes in store count during fiscal 2014: Company-owned stores Licensee-owned stores Total November 30, 2013 55 34 89 Openings* 6 - 6 Closed (1) - (1) Transfers - - - November 30, 2014 60 34 94 *Does not include openings and closures due to relocation of existing stores within a market. Due to the improved operating performance of our retail network along with continued improvement in underlying economic factors such as the housing market and consumer confidence, we have begun expanding our retail presence in various parts of the country. As part of this expansion we opened six new stores during fiscal 2014 as well as relocating two others. As a result, we spent $13,836 in capital expenditures for new and relocated stores in 2014. We expect to spend slightly less in 2015. 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) We expect to continue opening new stores in the future, primarily in underpenetrated markets where we currently have stores. We and certain licensees are actively engaged in site selection and lease negotiations for several locations and expect to open three to five new stores in 2015. While we currently expect to renew or extend three leases for Company- owned stores that expire in 2015, we will continue to evaluate whether it is more appropriate to reposition the stores to a more favorable location within the market as we do with any leases that come up for renewal. Specific plans for 2015 currently include opening new stores in Los Angeles (Woodland Hills), California and Dulles, Virginia, and the relocation of stores in San Antonio, Texas and Southlake, Texas where the lease expired in late 2014. During 2014, stores in the following locations were opened or relocated: New Stores Store Relocations Fort Worth, Texas Westport, Connecticut Annapolis, Maryland Burlington, Massachusetts Hartsdale, New York Rockville, Maryland Little Rock, Arkansas Boston (Chestnut Hill), Massachusetts As with any retail operation, prior to opening a new store we incur such expenses as rent, training costs and other payroll related costs. These costs generally range between $100 to $300 per store depending on the overall rent costs for the location and the period between the time when we take possession of the physical store space and the time of the store opening. Generally, rent payments between time of possession and opening of a new store are deferred and therefore rent costs recognized during that time do not require cash. Inherent in our retail business model, we also incur significant losses in the first two to three months of operation following a new store opening. Similar to other furniture retailers, we do not recognize a sale in the income statement until the furniture is delivered to our customer. Because our retail business model does not involve maintaining a stock of retail inventory that would result in quick delivery, and because of the custom nature of our furniture offerings, delivery to our customers usually does not occur until 30 days after an order is placed. We generally require a deposit at the time of order and collect the remaining balance when the furniture is delivered at which time the sale is recorded in the income statement. Coupled with the previously discussed store pre-opening costs, total start- up losses can range from $300 to $500 per store. While this expansion is initially costly to our operating results, we believe our site selection and new store presentation will generally result in locations that operate at or above a retail break-even level within 12 months of their opening. Even as these stores ramp up to break-even, we are realizing additional wholesale sales volume that will leverage the fixed costs in our wholesale business. We expect to continue opening and relocating stores in 2015. Our wholesale operations include an upholstery plant in Newton, North Carolina that produces a wide range of upholstered furniture. We believe that we are an industry leader with our quick-ship custom upholstery offerings. We also operate a custom dining manufacturing facility in Martinsville, Virginia. Most of our wood furniture and certain of our upholstery offerings are sourced through several foreign plants, primarily in Vietnam, Indonesia and China. We define imported product as fully finished product that is sourced internationally. For fiscal 2014, approximately 42% of our wholesale sales were of imported product compared to 46% for fiscal 2013. Our plans for 2015 include the launch of several significant new product categories. Beginning in the first quarter of 2015 we have introduced Bassett Baby and Kids in an effort to leverage our 70 year history in the juvenile and youth furniture products category. These products will initially be solely available on our website and in BHF retail stores. Another important new product program for 2015 will be “Bench Made”, a selection of American handmade dining furniture that will begin to appear in retail showrooms during the second quarter of 2015. Partnering with nearby hardwood component manufacturers, we will prepare, distress, finish, and assemble an assortment of solid maple tables and chairs in our newly renovated Bassett-owned facility in Bassett, Virginia. Finally, we plan to undertake a major makeover of our imported wood product assortment in 2015. All of these new products have been carefully designed in coordination with our merchants, designers, engineers and finishing technicians to achieve the upscale casual decor that we believe speaks to the Bassett consumer today. These new products are planned to appear in our stores in phases coinciding with key holiday selling periods throughout 2015. Our operating results for 2015 are expected to reflect the start-up costs associated with this increased level of product development activity. Traffic to our website, www.bassettfurniture.com, continues to grow. The ultimate goal of our digital strategy is to drive traffic to our retailers while deepening interactions with our consumers. Understanding that more and more consumers are using the web to research before making a purchase, we have worked diligently to enhance our online presence by making 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) it easier for consumers to browse our wide array of goods and build custom furniture. In 2015, we will continue to make improvements to our website and increase our social media presence to drive more visitors to our website and more qualified prospects to our stores. While sales through our website are currently not material, they have increased significantly in the last several years. We are leveraging our Company-owned and licensed store network to handle delivery and customer service for orders placed online. Analysis of Operations Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday of November, which periodically results in a 53-week year. Fiscal 2013 contained 53 weeks, while fiscal 2014 and 2012 each contained 52 weeks. Net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense, bad debt and notes receivable valuation charges, new store pre-opening costs, other charges, and income (loss) from operations were as follows for the years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013 and November 24, 2012: 2014 2013 2012 Net sales Gross profit SG&A New store pre-opening costs Other charges $ 340,738 182,421 166,073 100.0% $ 53.5% 48.7% 321,286 165,994 155,318 100.0% $ 51.7% 48.3% 269,672 141,322 134,801 1,217 - 0.4% 0.0% 671 - 0.2% 0.0% 371 1,070 Income from operations $ 15,131 4.4% $ 10,005 3.2% $ 5,080 100.0% 52.4% 50.0% 0.1% 0.4% 1.9% Sales for fiscal 2014 were $340,738 as compared to $321,286 for 2013 and $269,672 for 2012, representing increases of 6.1% and 19%, respectively. As noted above, fiscal 2013 contained 53 weeks while fiscal 2014 and 2012 contained 52 weeks. On an average weekly basis, sales for 2014 increased 8.1% over 2013. This trend primarily reflects the increase in the number of stores owned and operated by us, as well as growth in our wholesale shipments outside of our licensee network. Our consolidated net sales by segment were as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Wholesale Retail Inter-company elimination Consolidated net sales $ $ 223,993 $ 216,631 (99,886) 340,738 $ 215,451 $ 199,380 (93,545) 321,286 $ 185,187 171,633 (87,148) 269,672 Operating income was $15,131 for 2014 as compared to $10,005 for 2013 and $5,080 for 2012. These increases have been primarily attributable to improved wholesale margins along with improved pricing strategies at retail, partially offset by higher new store related costs (both pre- and post-opening), as we opened six new stores during 2014 as compared with two in 2013 and two in 2012. During fiscal 2012 our results of operations were negatively impacted by restructuring charges and lease exit costs totaling $1,070. Restructuring charges included a leasehold improvement impairment charge of $123 and closed plant asset impairment charges totaling $588. Lease exit costs totaled $359. See Note 15 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding these charges. Certain other items affecting comparability between periods are discussed below in “Investments and Real Estate Segment and Other Items Affecting Net Income (Loss)”. 3 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Segment Information We have strategically aligned our business into three reportable segments as described below: ● Wholesale. The wholesale home furnishings segment is involved principally in the design, manufacture, sourcing, sale and distribution of furniture products to a network of Bassett stores (Company-owned and licensee-owned retail stores) and independent furniture retailers. Our wholesale segment includes our wood and upholstery operations as well as all corporate selling, general and administrative expenses, including those corporate expenses related to both Company- and licensee-owned stores. We eliminate the sales between our wholesale and retail segments as well as the imbedded profit in the retail inventory for the consolidated presentation in our financial statements. ● Retail – Company-owned Stores. Our retail segment consists of Company-owned stores and includes the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities (including real estate) and capital expenditures directly related to these stores. ● Investments and Real Estate. Our investments and real estate segment consists of our short-term investments, our holdings of real estate leased or previously leased to licensees, and our equity investment in Zenith. We also hold an investment in Fortress, which we fully reserved during the first quarter of 2012. Although this segment does not have operating earnings, income or loss from the segment is included in other income (loss), net, in our consolidated statements of income. The following tables illustrate the effects of various intercompany eliminations on income (loss) from operations in the consolidation of our segment results: Year Ended November 29, 2014* Wholesale Retail Eliminations Consolidated Net sales Gross profit SG&A expense New store pre-opening costs Income (loss) from operations $ $ 223,993 $ 74,347 60,227 - 14,120 $ 216,631 $ 108,457 107,768 1,217 (528) $ (99,886) (1) $ (383) (2) (1,922) (3) - 1,539 $ 340,738 182,421 166,073 1,217 15,131 Year Ended November 30, 2013* Wholesale Retail Eliminations Consolidated Net sales Gross profit SG&A expense New store pre-opening costs Income (loss) from operations $ $ 215,451 $ 70,812 59,929 - 10,883 $ 199,380 $ 96,469 97,250 671 (1,452) $ (93,545) (1) $ (1,287) (2) (1,861) (3) - 574 $ 321,286 165,994 155,318 671 10,005 Year Ended November 24, 2012* Wholesale Retail Eliminations Consolidated Net sales Gross profit SG&A expense New store pre-opening costs Income (loss) from operations (4) $ $ 185,187 $ 59,817 52,317 - 7,500 $ 171,633 $ 82,361 84,057 371 (2,067) $ (87,148) (1) $ (856) (2) (1,573) (3) - 717 $ 269,672 141,322 134,801 371 6,150 (1) Represents the elimination of sales from our wholesale segment to our Company-owned BHF stores. (2) Represents the change for the period in the elimination of intercompany profit in ending retail inventory. (3) Represents the elimination of rent paid by our retail stores occupying Company-owned real estate. (4) Excludes the effects of restructuring and impairment charges and lease exit costs. These charges are not allocated to our segments. * 53 weeks for fiscal 2013 as compared with 52 weeks for fiscal 2014 and 2012. 4 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Wholesale Segment Net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense and operating income (loss) from operations for our Wholesale Segment were as follows for the years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013 and November 24, 2012: 2014 2013 2012 Net sales Gross profit SG&A Income from operations $ $ 223,993 74,347 60,227 14,120 100.0% $ 33.2% 26.9% 6.3% $ 215,451 70,812 59,929 10,883 100.0% $ 32.9% 27.8% 5.1% $ 185,187 59,817 52,317 7,500 100.0% 32.3% 28.3% 4.0% Wholesale shipments by category for the last three fiscal years are summarized below: 2014 2013 2012 Wood Upholstery Other Total $ $ 86,577 135,831 1,585 223,993 38.7% $ 60.6% 0.7% 100.0% $ 87,935 125,403 2,113 215,451 40.8% $ 58.2% 1.0% 100.0% $ 78,194 105,377 1,616 185,187 42.2% 56.9% 0.9% 100.0% Fiscal 2014 as Compared to Fiscal 2013 Net sales for the wholesale segment were $223,993 for 2014 as compared to $215,451 for 2013, an increase of $8,542, or 4.0%. On an average weekly basis (normalizing for the extra week in fiscal 2013), wholesale net sales increased 6.0%. Average weekly wholesale shipments to the open market (outside the Bassett Home Furnishings store network) for 2014 increased 10%, while average weekly shipments to the Bassett Home Furnishings store network increased by 4.2% compared to 2013. We have gained market share in the traditional furniture store channel as recent product offerings have been well received. Sales to our BHF store network were negatively impacted by slower business due to inclement weather during the winter months in early 2014 along with overall softness in the demand for wood furniture. Gross margins for the wholesale segment increased 30 basis points to 33.2% for 2014 as compared to 32.9% for 2013. This increase was primarily due to improved margins in the wood operations over the course of 2014 after discounting of discontinued product earlier in the year, and also due to the increased leveraging of fixed costs from higher sales volume in our upholstery operations. Wholesale SG&A increased $298 to $60,227 for 2014 as compared to $59,929 for 2013. SG&A costs as a percentage of sales decreased to 26.9% as compared to 27.6% for 2013 primarily due to tighter expense control. Income from operations was $14,120, or 6.3% of sales, for fiscal 2014 as compared to $10,883, or 5.1% of sales, for the prior year. Fiscal 2013 as Compared to Fiscal 2012 Net sales for the wholesale segment were $215,451 for 2013 as compared to $185,187 for 2012, an increase of $30,264, or 16%. On an average weekly basis (normalizing for the extra week in fiscal 2013), wholesale net sales increased 14%. Wholesale shipments to the open market (outside the Bassett Home Furnishings store network) for 2013 increased 38% and shipments to the Bassett Home Furnishings store network increased by 6.3% compared to 2012. This increase in open market shipments was driven by growth in the juvenile and traditional distribution channels. Gross margins for the wholesale segment were 32.9% for 2013 as compared to 32.3% for 2012. Margin improvement in the upholstery operations resulting from greater leverage of fixed costs due to increased sales volumes were partially offset by lower margins in the wood business from increased discounting of discontinued product. Wholesale SG&A increased $7,627 to $59,568 for 2013 as compared to $51,941 for 2013. SG&A costs as a percentage of sales decreased to 27.6% as compared to 28.0% for 2012. Profit improvement from leveraging fixed SG&A costs through higher sales volumes was partially offset by planned increased marketing and advertising costs of $1,072 to drive continued sales growth. 5 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Wholesale Backlog The dollar value of our wholesale backlog, representing orders received but not yet delivered to dealers and Company stores as of November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013, and November 24, 2012, was as follows: Year end wholesale backlog $ 13,644 $ 11,916 $ 11,988 2014 2013 2012 Retail Segment – Company Owned Stores Net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense, new store pre-opening costs and operating loss for our Retail Segment were as follows for the years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013 and November 24, 2012: 2014 vs 2013 2013 vs 2012 2014 2013 2013 2012 Net sales Gross profit SG&A expense New store pre-opening costs Loss from operations $ $ 216,631 108,457 107,768 100.0% $ 199,380 50.1% 96,469 49.7% 97,250 100.0% $ 199,380 48.4% 96,469 48.8% 97,250 100.0 % $ 171,633 48.4 % 82,361 48.8 % 84,057 100.0% 48.0% 49.0% 1,217 (528) 0.6% 671 -0.2% $ (1,452) 0.3% 671 -0.7% $ (1,452) 0.3 % 371 -0.7 % $ (2,067) 0.2% -1.2% The following tables present operating results on a comparable store basis for each comparative set of periods. Table A compares the results of the 51 stores that were open and operating for all of 2014 and 2013. Table B compares the results of the 47 stores that were open and operating for all of 2013 and 2012. Comparable Store Results: Table A: 2014 vs 2013 (51 Stores) Table B: 2013 vs 2012 (47 Stores) 2014 2013 2013 2012 Net sales Gross profit SG&A expense Income (loss) from operations $ 194,092 96,905 94,726 100.0% $ 187,146 49.9% 90,626 48.8% 90,389 100.0% $ 168,968 48.4% 82,072 48.3% 81,265 100.0 % $ 157,006 48.6 % 75,650 48.1 % 76,500 100.0% 48.2% 48.7% $ 2,179 1.1% $ 237 0.1% $ 807 0.5 % $ (850) -0.5% The following tables present operating results for all other stores which were not comparable year-over-year. Each table includes the results of stores that either opened or closed at some point during the 24 months of each comparative set of periods. All Other (Non-Comparable) Store Results: 2014 vs 2013 All Other Stores 2013 2014 2013 vs 2012 All Other Stores 2012 2013 Net sales Gross profit SG&A expense New store pre-opening $ 22,539 11,552 13,042 100.0% $ 12,234 5,843 51.3% 6,861 57.9% 100.0% $ 30,412 47.8% 14,397 56.1% 15,985 100.0 % $ 14,627 6,711 47.3 % 7,557 52.6 % 100.0% 45.9% 51.7% costs Loss from operations 1,217 $ (2,707) 5.4% 671 -12.0% $ (1,689) 5.5% 671 -13.8% $ (2,259) 2.2 % 371 -7.4 % $ (1,217) 2.5% -8.3% 6 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Fiscal 2014 as Compared to Fiscal 2013 Net sales for the 60 Company-owned stores were $216,631 for fiscal 2014 as compared to $199,380 for 2013, an increase of $17,251 or 8.7%. The increase was comprised of a $6,946 or 3.7% increase in comparable store sales and a $10,305 increase in non-comparable store sales. On an average weekly basis (normalizing for the extra week in the first quarter of 2013), comparable store sales increased 5.7%. While we do not recognize sales until goods are delivered to the consumer, we track written sales (the retail dollar value of sales orders taken, rather than delivered) as a key store performance indicator. Written sales for comparable stores increased by 4.3% for fiscal 2014 as compared to 2013. On an average weekly basis, written sales increased 6.4% over the prior year. The operating loss for the 60 Company-owned stores for fiscal 2014 was $528 as compared to an operating loss of $1,452 for 2013. This decline in the consolidated retail operating loss was primarily due to improved margins, partially offset by increased new store related opening costs, overlapping rent costs during the transition period for store relocations, and initial operating losses at newly opened locations. The 51 comparable stores generated operating income of $2,179 for 2014 as compared to $237 for the prior year. Gross margins at our comparable stores improved to 49.9% compared to 48.4% in the prior year due primarily to improved pricing strategies. SG&A expenses for comparable stores increased $4,337 to $94,726 or 48.8% of sales as compared to 48.3% for 2013. This increase is primarily due to planned increases in advertising spending, higher health care benefit costs, increased other overhead costs as the store network continues to grow and the effects of having one less week to leverage fixed costs. In addition, we incurred $222 of overlapping rent while two stores were in the process of being relocated. As with new store openings as described below, we begin to recognize rent expense at the date we take possession of the new store location. We will recognize rent expense on both locations until the date that the previously existing store closes. We completed relocations in Little Rock, Arkansas and Boston, Massachusetts during fiscal 2014, with two additional relocations in Texas expected to be completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. We define a store relocation as the closing of one store and opening of another store in the same market. Since there is no change in the store count for a specific market, we continue to include relocation costs as part of the comparable store operations. Losses from the non-comparable stores during fiscal 2014 were $2,707 which includes $1,217 of costs incurred prior to the opening of six stores during the year. These costs include rent, training costs and other payroll-related costs specific to a new store location incurred during the period leading up to its open and generally range between $100 to $300 per store based on the overall rent costs for the location and the period between the time when we take physical possession of the store space and the time when the store opens. Also included in the non-comparable store loss is $983 in post-opening losses from these six store openings. We incur losses in the first two to three months of operation following a store opening as sales are not recognized in the income statement until the furniture is delivered to its customers resulting in operating expenses without the normal sales volume. Because we do not maintain a stock of retail inventory that would result in quick delivery, and because of the custom nature of the furniture offerings, such deliveries are generally not made until after 30 days from when the furniture is ordered by the customer. Coupled with the pre-opening costs, total start-up losses typically amount to $300 to $500 per store. The remaining non-comparable stores incurred an operating loss of $507 during 2014. Each addition to our Company-owned store network results in incremental fixed overhead costs, primarily associated with local store personnel, occupancy costs and warehousing expenses. The incremental SG&A expenses associated with each new store will be ongoing. Fiscal 2013 as Compared to Fiscal 2012 Net sales for the 55 Company-owned stores were $199,380 for fiscal 2013 as compared to $171,633 for 2012, an increase of $27,747 or 16.2%. The increase was comprised of an $11,962 or 7.6% increase in comparable store sales and a $15,785 increase in non-comparable store sales. On an average weekly basis (normalizing for the extra week in the first quarter of 2013), comparable store sales increased 5.6%. While we do not recognize sales until goods are delivered to the consumer, we track written sales (the retail dollar value of sales orders taken, rather than delivered) as a key store performance 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) indicator. Written sales for comparable stores increased by 9.0% for fiscal 2013 as compared to 2012. On an average weekly basis, written sales increased 7.0% over the prior year. The operating loss for the 55 Company-owned stores for fiscal 2013 was $1,452 million as compared to an operating loss of $2,067 for 2012. The 47 comparable stores generated operating income of $807 for 2013 as compared to a loss of $850 for the prior year. Gross margins at our comparable stores improved to 48.6% compared to 48.2% in the prior year due primarily to improved pricing strategies, partially offset by a concerted effort during the first half of 2013 to reduce clearance inventory levels. SG&A expenses for comparable stores increased $4,765 to $81,265 or 48.1% of sales as compared to 48.7% for 2012. This decrease as a percent of sales is due to increased sales volumes leveraging fixed costs partially offset by planned increased retail overhead investments as we manage growth in store count. Losses from the non-comparable stores in 2013 were $2,259 which includes $671 of costs prior to the opening of three stores during the year and four other stores that will be opening in the first quarter of 2014. These costs include rent, training costs and other payroll-related costs specific to a new store location incurred during the period leading up to its open and generally range between $100 to $300 per store based on the overall rent costs for the location and the period between the time when the Company takes possession of the physical store space and the time of the store opening. Also included in the non-comparable store loss are post-opening losses from the store openings. We incur losses in the first two to three months of operation following a store opening as sales are not recognized in the income statement until the furniture is delivered to its customers resulting in operating expenses without the normal sales volume. Because we do not maintain a stock of retail inventory that would result in quick delivery, and because of the custom nature of the furniture offerings, such deliveries are generally not made until after 30 days from when the furniture is ordered by the customer. Coupled with the pre-opening costs, total start-up losses typically amount to $300 to $500 per store. Also included in the 2013 non-comparable stores are the operations of stores opened or acquired during 2012. Retail Comparable Store Sales Increases The following table provides year-over-year comparable store sales increases for the last three fiscal years. Due to fiscal 2013 containing 53 weeks, we have also provided such changes on an average weekly basis for comparability purposes. As reported: Delivered Written Average weekly basis: Delivered Written 2014 2013 2012 3.7% 4.3% 5.7% 6.4% 7.6% 9.0% 9.1% 10.6% 5.6% 7.0% 9.1% 10.6% Retail Backlog The dollar value of our retail backlog, representing orders received but not yet delivered to customers as of November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013, and November 24, 2012, was as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Year end retail backlog Retail backlog per open store $ 30,206 503 $ $ 22,483 409 $ $ 18,180 343 $ 8 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Investments and Real Estate Segment and Other Items Affecting Net Income (Loss) At November 29, 2014, our investments and real estate segment consists of our short-term investments, our holdings of retail real estate previously leased as licensee stores and our equity investment in Zenith. Previously, this segment also included our investments in marketable securities (which were liquidated during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012), and our investment in the Fortress Value Recovery Fund I, LLC (“Fortress”), which was fully impaired during the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Although this segment does not have operating earnings, income or loss from the segment is included in other income in our consolidated statements of income. We own 49% of Zenith Freight Lines, LLC (“Zenith”), which provides domestic transportation and warehousing services primarily to furniture manufacturers and distributors and also provides home delivery services to furniture retailers. We have contracted with Zenith to provide for substantially all of our domestic freight, transportation and warehousing needs for the wholesale business. In addition, Zenith provides home delivery services for almost half of our Company-owned retail stores. Zenith offers their customers best-of-class service and handling. We consider the expertise that Zenith exhibits in logistics to be a significant competitive advantage for us. In addition, we believe that Zenith is well positioned to take advantage of current growth opportunities for providing logistical services to the furniture industry. At November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, our investment in Zenith was $7,915 and $7,254, respectively. Investments and real estate income (loss) and other items affecting net income for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Income from unconsolidated affiliated company (1) Income from Continued Dumping & Subsidy Offset Act (2) Other than temporary impairment of investments (3) Interest expense (4) Retail real estate impairment charges (5) Loan and lease guarantee (expense) recovery (6) Investment income (7) Other (8) 661 - - (188) - 66 352 (1,415) 770 - - (255) (416) (40) 99 (1,976) 347 9,010 (806) (295) - 41 453 (1,816) Total other income (loss), net $ (524) $ (1,818) $ 6,934 (1) See note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to our income from Zenith, an unconsolidated affiliated company. (2) See note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to our income from the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (“CDSOA”). (3) Represents the full impairment of our investment in Fortress. See note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. See also table footnote 7 below. (4) Our interest expense consists primarily of interest on our retail real estate mortgage obligations. This expense has been declining steadily as those obligations have been repaid. (5) See note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to impairment charges and lease exit costs related to our retail real estate. (6) Loan and lease guarantee expense consists of adjustments to our reserves for the net amount of our estimated losses on loan and lease guarantees that we have entered into on behalf of our licensees. The recovery (expense) recognized for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2012 reflects the changes in our estimates of the risk that we may have to assume the underlying obligations with respect to our guarantees. (7) Investment income for fiscal 2014 includes both interest income and the gain from the partial liquidation of our previously impaired investment in Fortress (see note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. See also table footnote 3 above). Fiscal 2013 includes only interest income from cash equivalents and short term investments. Fiscal 2012 includes both interest income and net realized gains from the sale of marketable securities. (8) Fiscal 2014 includes $827 in death benefits received from life insurance policies covering former executives, compared with $304 of similar proceeds in fiscal 2013 and none in fiscal 2012. 9 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Provision for Income taxes We recorded an income tax provision (benefit) of $5,308, $3,091 and $(14,699) in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For fiscal 2014, our effective tax rate of approximately 36.3% differs from the statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to the effects of state income taxes, adjustments to state net operating loss carryforwards, a reduction in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and permanent differences arising from non-taxable income. For fiscal 2013, our effective tax rate of approximately 37.8% differs from the statutory rate of 34.0% primarily due to the effects of state income taxes and permanent differences arising from non-deductible expenses. For fiscal 2012, our effective tax rate of approximately (122.3)% differs from the statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to the reversal of the majority of the valuation allowance on existing deferred tax assets, resulting in a credit to income of $18,704. See note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our income tax provision (benefit), as well as our net deferred tax assets and other matters. We have net deferred tax assets of $14,969 as of November 29, 2014, which, upon utilization, are expected to reduce our cash outlays for income taxes in future years. It will require approximately $43,000 of future taxable income to utilize our net deferred tax assets. The Company’s fiscal 2013 and 2012 income tax returns are currently under examination by the IRS. Liquidity and Capital Resources We are committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet in order to weather difficult industry conditions, to allow us to take advantage of opportunities as market conditions improve, and to execute our long-term retail strategies. Our return to operating profitability over the last three years has enabled us to generate significantly improved operating cash flow over that time period. In addition, we have benefited from significant additional liquidity provided by the sale of our interest in IHFC in fiscal 2011 and the final distribution of funds from the CDSOA in fiscal 2012. Sale of IHFC & Final Distribution of CDSOA Funds During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we received $9,010 representing our share of the final distribution of duties that had been withheld by U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act. See note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the CDSOA final distribution. On May 2, 2011 we completed the sale of our investment in IHFC, receiving cash proceeds of $69,152 upon closing. Additional proceeds which were placed in escrow at closing have since been released to us, with $2,348 received in each of fiscal 2014 and 2013 and $1,410 received in fiscal 2012. These receipts represent the full amount of the funds originally escrowed and we have no further contingent obligations in connection with the sale of IHFC. Cash Flows Cash provided by operations for fiscal 2014 was $29,961 compared to cash provided by operations of $10,640 for 2013, an increase of $19,321. This improvement is primarily the result of our improved operating performance along with better overall working capital management. In addition, we received $3,060 in tenant improvement funds during 2014 associated with leasing new stores and store relocations. Cash provided by operations during 2014 was partially reduced by the placement of a $1,150 collateral deposit with one of our insurance carriers during the third quarter. Our overall cash position increased by $13,940 during fiscal 2014. Cash provided by operations was partially offset by net cash used in investing activities of $5,155, primarily consisting of capital expenditures for retail store expansion, remodeling and relocations substantially offset by proceeds from the maturity of short-term investments in certificates of deposit, the release of the remaining escrowed funds from the 2011 sale of our interest in IHFC, and proceeds from the disposition of real estate investment properties. Cash used in financing activities totaled $10,866, consisting primarily of dividend payments and stock repurchases under our existing share repurchase plan, of which $20,000 remains authorized as of November 29, 2014. With cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $49,798 on hand at November 29, 2014, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to fund operations for the foreseeable future. 10 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Debt and Other Obligations On December 18, 2012, we entered into a credit facility with our bank extending us a line of credit of up to $15,000. This line is secured by our accounts receivable and inventory. This facility contains certain covenants requiring us to maintain certain key financial ratios. We are in compliance with all covenants under the agreement and expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future. This line will mature in December of 2015, at which time we expect to obtain a new line under substantially similar terms. At November 29, 2014, we had $216 outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving availability under our credit line of $14,784. We have two mortgages totaling $2,218 outstanding as of November 29, 2014. We expect to satisfy the remaining mortgage obligations using cash flow from operations or our available cash on hand. We lease land and buildings that are used in the operation of our Company-owned retail stores as well as in the operation of licensee-owned stores. We had obligations of $92,558 at November 29, 2014 for future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year. We also have guaranteed certain lease obligations of licensee operators. Remaining terms under these lease guarantees range from approximately one to five years. We were contingently liable under licensee lease obligation guarantees in the amount of $3,164 at November 29, 2014. Dividends and Share Repurchases During fiscal 2014, we declared four quarterly dividends totaling $2,983, or $0.28 per share, and one special dividend of $2,102, or $0.20 per share. Cash dividend payments to our shareholders during fiscal 2014 totaled $5,155. We also repurchased 404,300 shares of our stock for $5,601 under our share repurchase program. The weighted-average effect of these share repurchases was to increase both our basic and diluted earnings per share in 2014 by approximately $0.01. Capital Expenditures We currently anticipate that total capital expenditures for fiscal 2015 will be approximately $18 million which will be used primarily for the build out of new stores and the remodeling of existing Company-owned stores. Our capital expenditure and working capital requirements in the foreseeable future may change depending on many factors, including but not limited to the overall performance of the new stores, our rate of growth, our operating results and any adjustments in our operating plan needed in response to industry conditions, competition or unexpected events. We believe that our existing cash, together with cash from operations, will be sufficient to meet our capital expenditure and working capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Subsequent Announcement of Intention to Acquire Zenith On January 21, 2015 we announced our intention to acquire the remaining 51% of Zenith Freight Lines, LLC in a transaction that is expected to close during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The purchase price is valued at $20,000 to be paid in increments of cash and Bassett common stock over a three year period. Fair Value Measurements We account for items measured at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820’s valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy: Level 1 Inputs– Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 2 Inputs– Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. 11 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Level 3 Inputs– Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers. We believe that the carrying amounts of our current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short- term nature of these items. The recurring estimate of the fair value of our mortgages payable for disclosure purposes (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) involves Level 3 inputs. Our primary non-recurring fair value estimates, typically involving the valuation of business acquisitions (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and asset impairments (see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) have utilized Level 3 inputs. Contractual Obligations and Commitments We enter into contractual obligations and commercial commitments in the ordinary course of business (See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of these obligations). The following table summarizes our contractual payment obligations and other commercial commitments and the fiscal year in which they are expected to be paid. Post employment benefit obligations (1) Real estate notes payable Other obligations & commitments Contractual advertising Interest payable Letters of credit Operating leases (2) Lease guarantees (4) Purchase obligations (3) 316 900 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total $ 1,052 $ 1,015 $ 338 900 2,500 2,500 118 - 935 $ 386 100 - 69 - 963 $ 361 200 - 94 - 884 $ 413 100 - 42 140 216 18,243 15,713 13,194 10,778 8,984 1,396 - - 424 - 739 - 737 - 404 300 - 14 - 10,187 $ 15,036 2,218 2,500 5,000 477 216 25,646 92,558 3,296 - 36,551 $121,301 - - Total $ 24,763 $ 21,321 $ 15,551 $ 12,692 $ 10,423 $ (1) Does not reflect a reduction for the impact of any company owned life insurance proceeds to be received. Currently, we have life insurance policies with net death benefits of $3,148 to provide funding for these obligations. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. (2) Does not reflect a reduction for the impact of sublease income to be received. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. (3) The Company is not a party to any long-term supply contracts with respect to the purchase of raw materials or finished goods. At the end of fiscal year 2014, we had approximately $19,694 in open purchase orders, primarily for imported inventories, which are in the ordinary course of business. Lease guarantees relate to payments we would only be required to make in the event of default on the part of the guaranteed parties. (4) This table does not reflect our estimated liability for uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest and penalties thereon, of $1,370 at November 29, 2014. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of this reserve. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We utilize stand-by letters of credit in the procurement of certain goods in the normal course of business. We lease land and buildings that are primarily used in the operation of BHF stores. We have guaranteed certain lease obligations of licensee operators as part of our retail strategy. See Contractual Obligations and Commitments table above and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion of operating leases, lease guarantees and loan guarantees, including descriptions of the terms of such commitments and methods used to mitigate risks associated with these arrangements. 12 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Contingencies We are involved in various claims and litigation as well as environmental matters, which arise in the normal course of business. Although the final outcome of these legal and environmental matters cannot be determined, based on the facts presently known, it is our opinion that the final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or future results of operations. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) which requires that certain estimates and assumptions be made that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in those financial statements and the related accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. We use our best judgment in valuing these estimates and may, as warranted, solicit external advice. Estimates are based on current facts and circumstances, prior experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable. The following critical accounting policies, some of which are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates, affect our consolidated financial statements. Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and its majority-owned subsidiaries for whom we have operating control. In accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, we have evaluated our licensees and certain other entities to determine whether they are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) of which we are the primary beneficiary and thus would require consolidation in our financial statements. To date we have concluded that none of our licensees nor any other of our counterparties represent VIEs. Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized when the risks and rewards of ownership and title to the product have transferred to the buyer. This generally occurs upon the shipment of goods to independent dealers or, in the case of Company-owned retail stores, upon delivery to the customer. Our wholesale payment terms generally vary from 30 to 60 days. For retail sales, we typically receive a significant portion of the purchase price as a customer deposit upon order, with the balance typically collected upon delivery. An estimate for returns and allowances has been provided in recorded sales. The contracts with our licensee store owners do not provide for any royalty or license fee to be paid to us. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”) outlines the four basic criteria for recognizing revenue as follows: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. SAB 104 further asserts that if collectibility of all or a portion of the revenue is not reasonably assured, revenue recognition should be deferred until payment is received. During fiscal 2014 and 2013, there were no dealers for which these criteria were not met. During fiscal 2012 there were two dealers for which these criteria were not met and therefore revenue was being recognized on a cost recovery basis. As of November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013 and November 24, 2012 there were no dealers that remained on a cost recovery basis. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. Our accounts receivable reserves were $1,249 and $1,607 at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively, representing 7.6% and 9.1% of our gross accounts receivable balances at those dates, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a review of specifically identified customer accounts in addition to an overall aging analysis. We evaluate the collectibility of our receivables from our licensees and other customers on a quarterly basis based on factors such as their financial condition, our collateral position, potential future plans with licensees and other similar factors. Our allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best estimate of potential losses on our accounts and notes receivable and is adjusted accordingly based on historical experience, current developments and present economic conditions and trends. Although actual losses have not differed materially from our previous estimates, future losses could differ from our current estimates. Unforeseen events such as a licensee or customer bankruptcy filing could have a material impact on our results of operations. Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined for domestic furniture inventories using the last-in, first-out method. The cost of imported inventories is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. We estimate an inventory reserve for excess quantities and obsolete items based on specific identification and historical write-offs, taking into account future demand and market conditions. Our reserves for excess and obsolete inventory were $1,412 and 13 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) $1,293 at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively, each representing 2.4% of our inventories on a last-in, first-out basis. If actual demand or market conditions in the future are less favorable than those estimated, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Valuation Allowance on Deferred Tax Assets – We evaluate our deferred income tax assets to determine if valuation allowances are required or should be adjusted. A valuation allowance is established against our deferred tax assets based on consideration of all available evidence, both positive and negative, using a “more likely than not” standard. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of recent losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, our experience with tax attributes expiring unused and tax planning alternatives. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Due to the losses incurred prior to fiscal 2011, we were in a cumulative loss position for the preceding three years which is considered significant negative evidence that is difficult to overcome on a “more likely than not” standard through objectively verifiable data. While our long-term financial outlook remained positive, we concluded that our ability to rely on our long- term outlook and forecasts as to future taxable income was limited due to uncertainty created by the weight of the negative evidence. As a result, we previously recorded a valuation allowance on certain of the deferred tax assets. In fiscal 2011, due to the gain recognized on the sale of our interest in IHFC, we were able to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and credits to significantly offset the taxable gain, resulting in a significant reduction of the valuation allowance. However, as the gain on the sale of IHFC did not represent a source of recurring future taxable income, we continued to record a valuation allowance against substantially all of our deferred tax assets as of November 26, 2011. Due to our positive earnings during fiscal 2012 and subsequent years, and the absence of any significant negative evidence to the contrary, we have concluded that we can rely on our positive long-term outlook and forecasts as to future taxable income in evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the reserve against the majority of our deferred tax assets was removed in fiscal 2012, resulting in a credit to income of $18,704, which is included in our net income tax benefit for 2012. Additional reductions in the reserve related to changes in laws which impact our ability to recover certain state net operating loss carryforwards resulted in a credit to income of $974, which is included in our net income tax expense for 2014. The remaining valuation allowance at November 29, 2014 is $70. Goodwill – Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the value assigned to tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. The acquisition of assets and liabilities and any resulting goodwill is allocated to the respective reporting unit; Wholesale, Retail or Investments and Real Estate. We review goodwill at the reporting unit level annually for impairment or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired. In accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill & Other, the goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary. However, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. The more likely than not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary and our goodwill is considered to be unimpaired. However, if based on our qualitative assessment we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we will proceed with performing the two-step process. Based on our qualitative assessment as described above, we have concluded that this goodwill is not impaired as of November 29, 2014. The first step compares the carrying value of each reporting unit that has goodwill with the estimated fair value of the respective reporting unit. Should the carrying value of a reporting unit be in excess of the estimated fair value of that reporting unit, the second step is performed whereby we must calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit. This second step represents a hypothetical purchase price allocation as if we had acquired the reporting unit on that date. Our impairment methodology uses a discounted cash flow analysis requiring certain assumptions and estimates to be made regarding future profitability of the reporting unit and industry economic factors. While we believe such assumptions and estimates are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from the projected amounts. 14 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share data) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - We periodically evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate long-lived assets may not be recoverable or that the remaining useful life may warrant revision. When such events or circumstances are present, we assess the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value will be recovered through the expected undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset. In the event the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value is recorded. When analyzing our real estate properties for potential impairment, we consider such qualitative factors as our experience in leasing and selling real estate properties as well as specific site and local market characteristics. Upon the closure of a Bassett Home Furnishings store, we generally write off all tenant improvements which are only suitable for use in such a store. Recent Accounting Pronouncements See note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements regarding the impact or potential impact of recent accounting pronouncements upon our financial position and results of operations. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK We are exposed to market risk from changes in the value of foreign currencies. Substantially all of our imports purchased outside of North America are denominated in U.S. dollars. Therefore, we believe that gains or losses resulting from changes in the value of foreign currencies relating to foreign purchases not denominated in U.S. dollars would not be material to our results from operations in fiscal 2015. We are exposed to market risk from changes in the cost of raw materials used in our manufacturing processes, principally wood, woven fabric, and foam products. An increase in the rate of in home construction could result in increases in wood and fabric costs from current levels, and the cost of foam products, which are petroleum-based, is sensitive to changes in the price of oil. We have potential exposure to market risk related to conditions in the commercial real estate market. Our retail real estate holdings of $6,302 and $10,435 at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively, for stores formerly operated by licensees as well as our holdings of $27,843 and $28,531 at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively, for Company-owned stores could suffer significant impairment in value if we are forced to close additional stores and sell or lease the related properties during periods of weakness in certain markets. Additionally, if we are required to assume responsibility for payment under the lease obligations of $3,296 and $3,698 which we have guaranteed on behalf of licensees as of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively, we may not be able to secure sufficient sub-lease income in the current market to offset the payments required under the guarantees. Number of Locations Aggregate Square Footage Net Book Value (in thousands) Real estate occupied by Company-owned and operated stores, included in property and equipment, net (1) 11 276,887 $ 27,843 Investment real estate: Leased Other (2) Total included in retail real estate 3 - 3 67,521 - 67,521 6,287 15 6,302 Total Company investment in retail real estate 14 344,408 $ 34,145 (1) Includes two properties encumbered under mortgages totaling $2,218 at November 29, 2014. (2) Consists of leasehold improvements in locations leased by the Company and subleased to licensees. 15 As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, “Bassett,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and its subsidiaries. References to 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 mean the fiscal years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013, November 24, 2012, November 26, 2011 and November 27, 2010. Please note that fiscal 2013 contained 53 weeks. SAFE-HARBOR, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and subsidiaries. Such forward-looking statements are identified by use of forward-looking words such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “estimates”, “expects”, “aimed” and “intends” or words or phrases of similar expression. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. No assurance can be given that any such matters will be realized. Important factors, which should be read in conjunction with Item 1A “Risk Factors”, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include: ● competitive conditions in the home furnishings industry ● general economic conditions, including the strength of the housing market in the United States ● overall retail traffic levels and consumer demand for home furnishings ● ability of our customers and consumers to obtain credit ● Bassett store openings ● store closings and the profitability of the stores (independent licensees and Company-owned retail stores) ● ability to implement our Company-owned retail strategies and realize the benefits from such strategies as they are implemented ● fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials, labor and sourced products ● results of marketing and advertising campaigns ● information and technology advances ● future tax legislation, or regulatory or judicial positions ● ability to efficiently manage the import supply chain to minimize business interruption ● concentration of domestic manufacturing, particularly of upholstery products, and the resulting exposure to business interruption from accidents, weather and other events and circumstances beyond our control 16 Consolidated Balance Sheets Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013 (In thousands, except share and per share data) Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,249 and $1,607 $ as of November 29, 2014 and November 29, 2013, respectively Inventories Deferred income taxes, net Other current assets Total current assets Property and equipment, net Other long-term assets Retail real estate Deferred income taxes, net Other Total other long-term assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable Accrued compensation and benefits Customer deposits Dividends payable Other accrued liabilities Total current liabilities Long-term liabilities Post employment benefit obligations Real estate notes payable Other long-term liabilities Total long-term liabilities Commitments and Contingencies Stockholders’ equity $ $ 2014 2013 26,673 $ 23,125 15,228 57,272 5,268 7,796 135,362 12,733 28,125 16,080 53,069 4,418 11,949 126,374 74,812 64,271 6,302 9,701 14,569 30,572 240,746 $ 10,435 10,734 14,035 35,204 225,849 22,251 $ 8,931 22,202 2,102 11,287 66,773 11,498 1,902 3,741 17,141 19,892 6,503 16,214 2,172 6,660 51,441 11,146 2,467 3,386 16,999 Common stock, $5 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 10,493,393 at November 29, 2014 and 10,859,318 at November 30, 2013 Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 52,467 106,339 (1,974 ) 156,832 240,746 $ 54,297 104,526 (1,414) 157,409 225,849 $ The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 17 Consolidated Statements of Income Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries For the years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013, and November 24, 2012 (In thousands, except per share data) 2014 2013 2012 Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit $ 340,738 $ 158,317 182,421 321,286 $ 155,292 165,994 Selling, general and administrative expenses excluding new store pre-opening costs New store pre-opening costs Restructuring and impairment charges Lease exit costs 166,073 1,217 - - 155,318 671 - - 269,672 128,350 141,322 134,801 371 711 359 Income from operations 15,131 10,005 5,080 Income from Continued Dumping & Subsidy Offset Act Other than temporary impairment of investments Income from unconsolidated affiliated company Interest expense Retail real estate impairment charges Other loss, net Income before income taxes Income tax expense (benefit) - - 661 (188) - (997) - - 770 (255 ) (416 ) (1,917 ) 9,010 (806) 347 (295) - (1,322) 14,607 8,187 12,014 5,308 3,091 (14,699) Net income $ 9,299 $ 5,096 $ 26,713 Net income per share Basic income per share Diluted income per share Dividends per share Regular dividends Special dividend $ $ $ $ 0.88 $ 0.48 $ 0.87 $ 0.47 $ 0.28 $ 0.20 $ 0.22 $ 0.20 $ 2.43 2.41 0.20 1.25 The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 18 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries For the years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013, and November 24, 2012 (In thousands) Net income Other comprehensive loss: Actuarial adjustment to supplemental executive retirement defined benefit plan (SERP) Income taxes related to SERP Net change in unrealized holding gains Income taxes related to unrealized holding gains Other comprehensive loss, net of tax 2014 2013 2012 $ 9,299 $ 5,096 $ 26,713 (918) 358 - - (560) (310 ) 119 - - (191 ) (656) 277 (211) (25) (615) Total comprehensive income $ 8,739 $ 4,905 $ 26,098 The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 19 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries For the years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013, and November 24, 2012 (In thousands) Operating activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used $ in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Equity in undistributed income of investments and unconsolidated affiliated companies Provision for restructuring and asset impairment charges Lease exit costs Other than temporary impairment of investments Tenant improvement allowances received from lessors Collateral deposited with insurance carrier Impairment and lease exit charges on retail real estate Deferred income taxes Other, net Changes in operating assets and liabilities Accounts receivable Inventories Other current and long-term assets Customer deposits Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Net cash provided by operating activities Investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment Proceeds from sales of property and equipment Acquisition of retail licensee stores Proceeds from sale of affiliate Proceeds from maturities and sales of investments Purchases of investments Cash received on notes receivable and other Net cash used in investing activities Financing activities: Repayments of real estate notes payable Issuance of common stock Repurchases of common stock Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Cash dividends Net cash used in financing activities Change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents - end of year $ 2014 2013 2012 9,299 $ 5,096 $ 26,713 7,316 6,198 5,473 (661) - - - 3,060 (1,150) - 544 264 775 (4,203) 1,548 5,912 7,257 29,961 (17,980) 5,157 - 2,348 5,000 - 320 (5,155) (528) 608 (5,602) (489) 300 (5,155) (10,866) 13,940 12,733 26,673 $ (770 ) - - - - - 416 2,282 677 (686 ) 4,847 (4,819 ) 3,961 (6,562 ) 10,640 (14,302 ) 958 - 2,348 - (28,125 ) 89 (39,032 ) (549 ) 706 (1,750 ) (226 ) 313 (2,935 ) (4,441 ) (32,833 ) 45,566 12,733 $ (347) 711 359 806 - - - (15,822) 977 (2,967) (11,307) (276) 3,015 621 7,956 (9,000) 19 (549) 1,410 4,854 (1,781) 1,240 (3,807) (570) 858 (7,015) (16) - (21,441) (28,184) (24,035) 69,601 45,566 The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 20 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries For the years ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013, and November 24, 2012 (In thousands, except share and per share data) Common Stock Additional paid-in Retained comprehensive Accumulated other Shares Amount capital earnings income (loss) Total Balance, November 26, 2011 11,342,332 $ 56,712 $ - $ 96,331 $ (608) $ 152,435 Comprehensive income Net income Actuarial adjustment to SERP Net change in unrealized holding gains Regular dividends ($0.20 per share) Special dividend ($1.25 per share) Issuance of common stock Purchase and retirement of common stock Stock-based compensation - - - - - 138,903 (644,395) - - - - - - 694 (3,222) - - - - - - 352 (988) 636 26,713 - - (2,214 ) (13,706 ) - (2,805 ) - - (379) (236) - - - - - 26,713 (379) (236) (2,214) (13,706) 1,046 (7,015) 636 Balance, November 24, 2012 10,836,840 54,184 - 104,319 (1,223) 157,280 Comprehensive income Net income Actuarial adjustment to SERP, net of tax Net change in unrealized holding gains, net of tax Regular dividends ($0.22 per share) Special dividend ($0.20 per share) Issuance of common stock Purchase and retirement of common stock Stock-based compensation Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation - - - - - 160,128 (137,650) - - - - - - 801 (688) - - - 5,096 - - (191) 5,096 (191) - - - (104) (937) 728 (2,393 ) (2,172 ) - (324 ) - - - - - - - - - (2,393) (2,172) 697 (1,949) 728 313 - - 313 - Balance, November 30, 2013 10,859,318 54,297 - 104,526 (1,414) 157,409 Comprehensive income Net income Actuarial adjustment to SERP, net of tax Regular dividends ($0.28 per share) Special dividend ($0.20 per share) Issuance of common stock Purchase and retirement of common stock Stock-based compensation Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation - - - - 69,619 (435,544) - - - - - 348 (2,178) - - - - - 260 (1,511) 951 9,299 - (2,983 ) (2,102 ) - (2,401 ) - - (560) - - - - - 9,299 (560) (2,983) (2,102) 608 (6,090) 951 - - 300 - - 300 Balance, November 29, 2014 10,493,393 $ 52,467 $ - $ 106,339 $ (1,974) $ 156,832 The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 21 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (In thousands, except share and per share data) 1. Description of Business Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Bassett”, “we”, “our”, the “Company”) based in Bassett, Va., is a leading manufacturer, marketer and retailer of branded home furnishings. Bassett’s full range of furniture products and accessories, designed to provide quality, style and value, are sold through an exclusive nation-wide network of 94 retail stores known as Bassett Home Furnishings (referred to as “BHF”). Of the 94 stores, the Company owns and operates 60 stores (“Company-owned retail stores”) with the other 34 being independently owned (“licensee operated”). We also distribute our products through other multi-line furniture stores, many of which feature Bassett galleries or design centers, specialty stores and mass merchants. The Company sourced approximately 42% of its wholesale products from various countries, with the remaining volume produced at its two domestic manufacturing facilities. 2. Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in November, which periodically results in a 53-week year. Fiscal 2013 contained 53 weeks, whereas fiscal 2014 and 2012 each contained 52 weeks. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and our majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"). Unless otherwise indicated, references in the Consolidated Financial Statements to fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 are to Bassett's fiscal year ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013 and November 24, 2012, respectively. References to the “ASC” included hereinafter refer to the Accounting Standards Codification established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as the source of authoritative GAAP. For comparative purposes, certain amounts in the 2013 and 2012 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 presentation. The equity method of accounting is used for our investment in an affiliated company in which we exercise significant influence but do not maintain a controlling interest. Consolidated net income includes our proportionate share of the net income or net loss of this company. We analyzed our licensees under the requirements for variable interest entities (“VIEs”). All of these licensees operate as BHF stores and are furniture retailers. We sell furniture to these licensees, and in some cases have extended credit beyond normal terms, made lease guarantees, guaranteed loans, or loaned directly to the licensees. We have recorded reserves for potential exposures related to these licensees. See Note 17 for disclosure of leases and lease guarantees. Based on financial projections and best available information, all licensees have sufficient equity to carry out their principal operating activities without subordinated financial support. Furthermore, we believe that the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the licensees’ operating performance continues to lie with the ownership of the licensee dealers. Our rights to assume control over or otherwise influence the licensees’ significant activities only exist pursuant to our license and security agreements and are in the nature of protective rights as contemplated under ASC Topic 810. We completed our assessment for other potential VIEs, and concluded that there were none. We will continue to reassess the status of potential VIEs including when facts and circumstances surrounding each potential VIE change. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Some of the more significant estimates include allowances for doubtful accounts, calculation of inventory reserves, valuation of income tax reserves, lease guarantees, insurance reserves, and assumptions related to our post- employment benefit obligations. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 22 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when the risks and rewards of ownership and title to the product have transferred to the buyer. This occurs upon the shipment of goods to independent dealers or, in the case of Company-owned retail stores, upon delivery to the customer. We offer terms varying from 30 to 60 days for wholesale customers. For retail sales, we typically collect a significant portion of the purchase price as a customer deposit upon order, with the balance typically collected upon delivery. These deposits are carried on our balance sheet as a current liability until delivery is fulfilled. Estimates for returns and allowances have been recorded as a reduction to revenue. The contracts with our licensee store owners do not provide for any royalty or license fee to be paid to us. Revenue is reported net of any taxes collected. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”) outlines the four basic criteria for recognizing revenue as follows: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. SAB 104 further asserts that if collectability of all or a portion of the revenue is not reasonably assured, revenue recognition should be deferred until payment is received. During fiscal 2014 and 2013, there were no dealers for which these criteria were not met. During fiscal 2012 there were two dealers for which these criteria were not met and therefore revenue was being recognized on a cost recovery basis. As of and subsequent to November 24, 2012 there have been no dealers that remained on a cost recovery basis. As of November 24, 2012 there was no deferred gross profit resulting from the cost recovery method carried on our balance sheet as a reduction of accounts receivable. For fiscal 2012, no revenue or cost was deferred during the year under the cost recovery method. Cash Equivalents The Company considers cash on hand, demand deposits in banks and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. Our short-term investments, which consist of certificates of deposit, are not considered cash equivalents since they have original maturities of greater than three months. Accounts Receivable Substantially all of our trade accounts receivable is due from customers located within the United States. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a review of specifically identified accounts in addition to an overall aging analysis. Judgments are made with respect to the collectibility of accounts receivable based on historical experience and current economic trends. Actual losses could differ from those estimates. The majority of our trade accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts are attributable to amounts owed to us by our licensees, with the remaining receivables due primarily from national account customers and traditional distribution channel customers. The percentages of our trade accounts receivable and related allowance for doubtful accounts owed to us by our licensees were as follows at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013: Portion of trade accounts receivable owed by licensees Portion of allowance for doubtful accounts attributable to licensees 2014 46% 58% 2013 50% 64% 23 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Customers Financial instruments that subject us to credit risk consist primarily of investments, accounts and notes receivable and financial guarantees. Investments are managed within established guidelines to mitigate risks. Accounts and notes receivable and financial guarantees subject us to credit risk partially due to the concentration of amounts due from and guaranteed on behalf of independent licensee customers. At November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, our aggregate exposure from receivables and guarantees related to customers consisted of the following: Accounts receivable, net of allowances (Note 4) Notes receivable, net of allowances Contingent obligations under lease and loan guarantees, less amounts recognized (Note 17) Total credit risk exposure related to customers 2014 2013 $ $ 15,228 $ 592 3,046 18,866 $ 16,080 632 3,523 20,235 At November 29, 2014 approximately 24% of the aggregate risk exposure, net of reserves, shown above was attributable to two licensees. At November 30, 2013, approximately 27% of the aggregate risk exposure, net of reserves, shown above was attributable to two licensees. In fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, no customer accounted for more than 10% of total net sales. We have no foreign manufacturing or retail operations. We define export sales as sales to any country or territory other than the United States or its territories or possessions. Our export sales were approximately $4,774, $4,603, and $4,596 in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Inventories Inventories (retail merchandise, finished goods, work in process and raw materials) are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined for domestic manufactured furniture inventories using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method because we believe this methodology provides better matching of revenue and expenses. The cost of imported inventories is determined on a first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis. Inventories accounted for under the LIFO method represented 40% of total inventory before reserves at both November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013. We estimate inventory reserves for excess quantities and obsolete items based on specific identification and historical write-offs, taking into account future demand and market conditions. If actual demand or market conditions in the future are less favorable than those estimated, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Property and Equipment Property and equipment is comprised of all land, buildings and leasehold improvements and machinery and equipment used in the manufacturing and warehousing of furniture, our Company-owned retail operations and the administration of the wholesale and Company-owned retail operations. This property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets utilizing the straight-line method. Buildings and improvements are generally depreciated over a period of 10 to 39 years. Machinery and equipment are generally depreciated over a period of 5 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized based on the underlying lease term, or the asset’s estimated useful life, whichever is shorter. Retail Real Estate Retail real estate is comprised of owned and leased properties which have been utilized by licensee operated BHF stores, including properties which are now leased or subleased to non-licensee tenants. These properties are located in high traffic, upscale locations that are normally occupied by large successful national retailers. This real estate is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and is depreciated over the useful lives of the respective assets utilizing the straight line method. Buildings and improvements are generally depreciated over a period of 10 to 39 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized based on the underlying lease term, or the asset’s estimated useful life, whichever is shorter. As of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, the cost of retail real estate included land totaling $1,990 and $3,502, respectively, and building and leasehold improvements of $8,831 and $11,635, respectively. As of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 24 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 2013, accumulated depreciation of retail real estate was $4,631 and $4,834, respectively. Depreciation expense was $400, $484, and $501 in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, and is included in other loss, net, in our consolidated statements of income. During the year ended November 29, 2014 we received proceeds from the disposition of retail real estate totaling $5,157. During the first quarter of fiscal 2014 we received $1,407 from the sale of our retail real estate investment property in Henderson, Nevada. This property had been classified as held for sale and included in other current assets in our consolidated balance sheet at November 30, 2013. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014 we received net proceeds in the amount of $3,750 from the sale of our retail real estate investment property located in Denver, Colorado. This asset had been included in retail real estate in our consolidated balance sheet at November 30, 2013. There were no material gains or losses associated with these dispositions during the year ended November 29, 2014. Impairment charges related to retail real estate totaled $416 for 2013 and are included in retail real estate impairment charges in other income, a component of non-operating expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. There were no retail real estate impairment charges in 2014. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of consideration given over the fair value of the tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. The acquisition of assets and liabilities and the resulting goodwill is allocated to the respective reporting unit: Wholesale, Retail or Investments and Real Estate. We review goodwill at the reporting unit level annually for impairment or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired. In accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill & Other, the goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary. However, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. The more likely than not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary and our goodwill is considered to be unimpaired. However, if based on our qualitative assessment we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we will proceed with performing the two-step process. Based on our qualitative assessment as described above, we have concluded that our goodwill is not impaired as of November 29, 2014. The first step compares the carrying value of each reporting unit that has goodwill with the estimated fair value of the respective reporting unit. Should the carrying value of a reporting unit be in excess of the estimated fair value of that reporting unit, the second step is performed whereby we must calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit. This second step represents a hypothetical application of the acquisition method of accounting as if we had acquired the reporting unit on that date. Our impairment methodology uses a discounted cash flow analysis requiring certain assumptions and estimates to be made regarding future profitability of the reporting unit and industry economic factors. While we believe such assumptions and estimates are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from the projected amounts. Impairment of Long Lived Assets We periodically evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate long-lived assets may not be recoverable or that the remaining useful life may warrant revision. When such events or circumstances are present, we assess the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value will be recovered through the expected undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. In the event the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value is recorded. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values depending on the nature of the assets. The long-term nature of these assets requires the estimation of cash inflows and outflows several years into the future. 25 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) When analyzing our real estate properties for potential impairment, we consider such qualitative factors as our experience in leasing and selling real estate properties as well as specific site and local market characteristics. Upon the closure of a Bassett Home Furnishings store, we generally write off all tenant improvements which are only suitable for use in such a store. Income Taxes We account for income taxes under the liability method which requires that we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Despite our belief that our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is adequate, it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of the resolution of any particular tax matters. We may adjust these liabilities as relevant circumstances evolve, such as guidance from the relevant tax authority or our tax advisors, or resolution of issues in the courts. These adjustments are recognized as a component of income tax expense in the period in which they are identified. We evaluate our deferred income tax assets to determine if valuation allowances are required or should be adjusted. A valuation allowance is established against our deferred tax assets based on consideration of all available evidence, both positive and negative, using a “more likely than not” standard. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of recent losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, our experience with tax attributes expiring unused and tax planning alternatives. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. See Note 11. The Company’s fiscal 2013 and 2012 income tax returns are currently under examination by the IRS. New Store Pre-Opening Costs Income (loss) from operations for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 includes new store pre-opening costs of $1,217, $671 and $371, respectively. Such costs consist of expenses incurred at the new store location during the period prior to its opening and include, among other things, facility occupancy costs such as rent and utilities and local store personnel costs related to pre-opening activities including training. New store pre-opening costs do not include costs which are capitalized in accordance with our property and equipment capitalization policies, such as leasehold improvements and store fixtures and equipment. Such capitalized costs associated with new stores are depreciated commencing with the opening of the store. There are no pre-opening costs associated with stores acquired from licensees, as such locations were already in operation at the time of their acquisition. Shipping and Handling Costs Costs incurred to deliver wholesale merchandise to customers are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense and totaled $16,162, $15,685, and $13,548 for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Costs incurred to deliver retail merchandise to customers are also recorded in selling, general and administrative expense and totaled $12,844, $10,855, and $9,957 for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Advertising Costs incurred for producing and distributing advertising and advertising materials are expensed when incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Advertising costs totaled $15,614, $14,750, and $13,296 in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. 26 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) Insurance Reserves We have self-funded insurance programs in place to cover workers’ compensation and health insurance. For the period from July 2011 through June 2012, workers’ compensation was covered under a guaranteed cost program. These insurance programs are subject to various stop-loss limitations and are partially re-insured through a captive insurance program. We accrue estimated losses using historical loss experience. Although we believe that the insurance reserves are adequate, the reserve estimates are based on historical experience, which may not be indicative of current and future losses. We adjust insurance reserves, as needed, in the event that future loss experience differs from historical loss patterns. Supplemental Cash Flow Information In addition to the amounts paid, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition of licensee stores reported under investing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows, the majority of such acquisitions were funded primarily through non-cash transactions in which receivables due from the licensees were settled in exchange for certain inventory and property and equipment of the licensees as well as the assumption of certain liabilities. There were no such acquisitions during fiscal 2014 and 2013, and the value of the non-cash portion of such transactions was $1,592 for 2012. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11 (ASU 2013-11), which updated the guidance in ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. The amendments in ASU 2013-11 generally provide guidance for the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. The guidance requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met. This guidance will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2015 fiscal year and is consistent with our present practice. In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), which updated the guidance in ASC Topic 205, Presentation of Financial Statements, and ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. The amendments in ASU 2014-08 change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations for all public and nonpublic entities. The amendments also require new disclosures about discontinued operations and disposals of components of an entity that do not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. This guidance will become effective for all disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years, and therefore will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2016 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations. In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), which creates ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, ASU 2014-09 supersedes the cost guidance in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition— Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and creates new Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs— Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, and early application is not permitted. Therefore the amendments in ASU 2014-09 will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2018 fiscal year. The Company is currently assessing the impact of implementing the new guidance. 27 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 3. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss The activity in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the fiscal years ended November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, which is comprised solely of post-retirement benefit costs related to our SERP, is as follows: Balance at November 24, 2012 Actuarial losses Net pension amortization reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss Tax effects Balance at November 30, 2013 Actuarial losses Net pension amortization reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss Tax effects Balance at November 29, 2014 $ $ (1,223) (434) 124 119 (1,414) (1,084) 166 358 (1,974) 4. Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable consists of the following: November 29, 2014 November 30, 2013 Gross accounts receivable Allowance for doubtful accounts Net accounts receivable $ $ 16,477 $ (1,249) 15,228 $ 17,687 (1,607) 16,080 Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows: 2014 2013 Balance, beginning of the year Additions charged to expense Write-offs Balance, end of the year $ $ 1,607 $ 77 (435) 1,249 $ 1,789 361 (543) 1,607 We believe that the carrying value of our net accounts receivable approximates fair value. The inputs into these fair value estimates reflect our market assumptions and are not observable. Consequently, the inputs are considered to be Level 3 as specified in the fair value hierarchy in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. See Note 7. 28 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 5. Inventories Inventories consist of the following: Wholesale finished goods Work in process Raw materials and supplies Retail merchandise Total inventories on first-in, first-out method LIFO adjustment Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory November 29, 2014 November 30, 2013 $ $ 31,399 $ 298 8,109 26,428 66,234 (7,550) (1,412) 57,272 $ 28,450 277 8,029 25,167 61,923 (7,561) (1,293) 53,069 We source a significant amount of our wholesale product from other countries. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, purchases from our two largest vendors located in China and Vietnam were $26,707, $24,217 and $23,416 respectively. We estimate an inventory reserve for excess quantities and obsolete items based on specific identification and historical write-offs, taking into account future demand, market conditions and the respective valuations at LIFO. The need for these reserves is primarily driven by the normal product life cycle. As products mature and sales volumes decline, we rationalize our product offerings to respond to consumer tastes and keep our product lines fresh. If actual demand or market conditions in the future are less favorable than those estimated, additional inventory write-downs may be required. In determining reserves, we calculate separate reserves on our wholesale and retail inventories. Our wholesale inventories tend to carry the majority of the reserves for excess quantities and obsolete inventory due to the nature of our distribution model. These wholesale reserves primarily represent design and style obsolescence. Typically, product is not shipped to our retail warehouses until a consumer has ordered and paid a deposit for the product. We do not typically hold retail inventory for stock purposes. Consequently, floor sample inventory and inventory for delivery to customers account for the majority of our inventory at retail. Retail reserves are based on accessory and clearance floor sample inventory in our stores and any inventory that is not associated with a specific customer order in our retail warehouses. Activity in the reserves for excess quantities and obsolete inventory by segment are as follows: Wholesale Segment Retail Segment Total Balance at November 26, 2012 Additions charged to expense Write-offs Balance at November 24, 2013 Additions charged to expense Write-offs Balance at November 30, 2014 $ $ 715 $ 2,309 (2,023) 1,001 1,666 (1,607) 1,060 $ 374 $ 383 (465) 292 331 (271) 352 $ 1,089 2,692 (2,488) 1,293 1,997 (1,878) 1,412 29 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 6. Property and Equipment Property and equipment consist of the following: Land Buildings and leasehold improvements Machinery and equipment Less accumulated depreciation November 29, 2014 November 30, 2013 $ $ 11,371 $ 90,204 70,184 171,759 (96,947) 74,812 $ 11,371 75,965 67,183 154,519 (90,248) 64,271 Depreciation expense associated with the property and equipment shown above was included in income from operations in our consolidated statements of income as follows: Cost of goods sold (1) Selling, general and adminstrative expenses (2) Total depreciation expense included in income from operations $ $ 542 $ 6,814 7,356 $ 595 $ 5,279 5,874 $ 619 4,508 5,127 2014 2013 2012 (1) All associated with our wholesale segment for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012. (2) Includes depreciation associated with our retail segment of $5,782, $4,531 and $3,955 for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The net book value of property and equipment utilized by Company-owned stores at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013 was $59,879 and $51,748 respectively. 7. Financial Instruments, Investments and Fair Value Measurements Financial Instruments Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments in certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, cost and equity method investments, accounts payable and long-term debt. Because of their short maturities, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments in certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value. Our cost and equity method investments generally involve entities for which it is not practical to determine fair values. Investments Our short-term investments at November 29, 2014 consist of certificates of deposit (CDs) with terms generally ranging from six to twelve months, bearing interest at rates ranging from 0.10% to 0.91% with a weighted average yield of approximately 0.21%. At November 29, 2014, the weighted average remaining time to maturity of the CDs was approximately five months. Each CD is placed with a Federally insured financial institution and all deposits are within Federal deposit insurance limits. Due to the nature of these investments and their relatively short maturities, the carrying amount of the short-term investments at November 29, 2014 approximates their fair value. Prior to November 24, 2012, our investments consisted of a portfolio of marketable securities and our investment in the Fortress Value Recovery Fund I, LLC (“Fortress”), During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 we liquidated our entire portfolio of marketable securities, resulting in a net gain of $313 which is included in income from investments in our accompanying consolidated statement of income for the year ended November 24, 2012. Our marketable securities had been classified as available-for-sale and were marked to market and recorded at their fair value. We measured the fair value of our marketable securities in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. 30 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) Prior to the liquidation of our available for sale securities, unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related income tax effect, had been excluded from income and were reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The realized earnings from our marketable securities portfolio include realized gains and losses, based upon specific identification, and dividend and interest income. Realized earnings were $453 for fiscal 2012. Realized earnings for the year ended November 24, 2012 include $208 of gains previously recorded in other comprehensive income. These amounts are recorded other loss, net in our consolidated statements of income. We hold an investment in the Fortress Value Recovery Fund I, LLC (“Fortress”). Due to significant declines in net asset values during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the highly illiquid nature of the investment, and the high degree of uncertainty regarding our ability to recover our investment in the foreseeable future, we fully impaired the carrying amount of this investment during the year ended November 24, 2012. During the year ended November 29, 2014, we recognized gains of $280 resulting from the partial liquidation of Fortress which is included in other loss, net in our consolidated statement of income. The timing and amount of future receipts, if any, from the liquidation of Fortress, remain uncertain, and will be recognized as gains in other income if and when notification of a distribution is received. Fair Value Measurement The Company accounts for items measured at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820’s valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy: Level 1 Inputs– Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 2 Inputs– Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. Level 3 Inputs– Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers. We believe that the carrying amounts of our current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short- term nature of these items. The recurring estimate of the fair value of our mortgages payable for disclosure purposes (see Note 12) involves Level 3 inputs. Our primary non-recurring fair value estimates, typically involving the valuation of business acquisitions (Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and asset impairments (see Note 15) have utilized Level 3 inputs. 8. Income from the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act During the year ended November 24, 2012, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) made a distribution to us of $9,010 representing our share of the final distribution of duties that have been withheld by Customs under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”). Certain manufacturers who did not support the antidumping petition (“Non-Supporting Producers”) filed actions in the United States Court of International Trade challenging the CDSOA's “support requirement” and seeking to share in the distributions. As a result, Customs held back a portion of those distributions (“the Holdback”) pending resolution of the Non-Supporting Producers' claims. The Court of International Trade dismissed all of the actions of the Non-Supporting Producers, who appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the Court of Appeals”). The Court of Appeals denied the Non-Supporting Producers’ request for an injunction to block the final distribution of the Holdback and allowed Customs to distribute the funds in April of 2012, including the Company’s share of $9,010. The Court of Appeals ruled against the Non-Supporting Producers, who then each filed petitions for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court to obtain a hearing of their appeal. These petitions have since been denied, effectively ending the appeals process and the possibility that Customs would seek a return of the final distribution. 31 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 9. Licensee Acquisitions and Goodwill As we continually monitor business relationships with our licensees, we may determine from time to time that it is in our best interest to acquire a licensee’s operations in order to mitigate certain risks associated with the poor performance or potential failure of a licensee. Such risks include loss of receivables or underlying collateral, potential impairment of the value of our investments in real estate used by a licensee or exposure to contingent liabilities under lease guarantees, and potential harm to our market share and brand integrity within a licensee’s market. In addition, we are sometimes approached by our licensees to acquire all or certain stores operated by the licensee. We evaluate such opportunities considering, among other things, the viability of the market and our participation in the store real estate. There were no acquisitions of licensee operations during fiscal 2014 and 2013. During fiscal 2012, we acquired one store located in Knoxville, Tennessee and two stores in the Orange County, California market. In both cases our licensees desired to exit those markets but continue operating in other markets. The acquisition price for the Knoxville store was $673, funded through the exchange of $485 in cash and $188 in existing accounts receivable for the net assets acquired from the licensee plus recognized goodwill of $375. The acquisition price for the two Orange County stores was $1,468, funded through the exchange of $64 in cash and $1,404 in existing accounts receivable for the net assets acquired plus recognized goodwill of $921. Our acquisitions were accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The following table summarizes the net assets acquired and consideration given in the store acquisitions which occurred in fiscal 2012: Net assets acquired: Inventory Property and equipment/other Goodwill Customer deposits and other accrued expenses $ 1,480 592 1,296 (1,227) 2012 Total net assets acquired $ 2,141 Consideration given: Accounts receivable Cash Total consideration $ 1,592 549 $ 2,141 The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at fair value in accordance with ASC 805. Acquired inventory is valued at expected retail sales price less an allowance for direct selling costs and profit thereon. Acquired property and equipment are valued based upon our estimate of replacement cost less an allowance for age and condition at the time of acquisition. Customer deposits and accrued expenses are expected to be settled at face value within a short period following acquisition; therefore face value is assumed to approximate fair value. The inputs into these fair value calculations reflect our market assumptions and are not observable. Consequently, the inputs are considered to be Level 3 as specified in the fair value hierarchy in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. See Note 7. The pro forma impact of the acquisitions is not presented as we believe it is impractical to do so. We were not able to compile what we believed to be complete, accurate and reliable accounting information to use as a basis for pro forma presentations without an unreasonable effort. Net sales and operating losses generated by these stores subsequent to their acquisition during fiscal 2012 were $1,646 and $62, respectively. The carrying value of our goodwill, which is included in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, was $1,731 at both November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013. Of this balance, $1,129 is allocated to our wholesale segment and $602 is allocated to our retail segment. There have been no changes in the carrying value of our goodwill subsequent to the 2012 acquisitions. We perform our annual goodwill impairment review as of the beginning of our fiscal fourth quarter. No impairment charges have been required since fiscal 2009. 32 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 10. Unconsolidated Affiliated Companies Zenith Freight Lines, LLC We own 49% of Zenith Freight Lines, LLC, (“Zenith”) which provides domestic transportation and warehousing services primarily to furniture manufacturers and distributors and also provides home delivery services to furniture retailers. We have contracted with Zenith to provide for substantially all of our domestic freight, transportation and warehousing needs for the wholesale business. In addition, Zenith provides home delivery services for several of our Company-owned retail stores. Our investment in Zenith was $7,915 at November 29, 2014 and $7,254 at November 30, 2013 and is recorded in other long-term assets. We paid Zenith approximately $31,308, $29,313 and $25,317, for freight expense and logistical services in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. At November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, we owed Zenith $2,628 and $2,580, respectively, for services rendered to us. We believe the transactions with Zenith are at current market rates. We recorded the following earnings (losses) in income from unconsolidated affiliated companies, net in our consolidated statements of income: Earnings recognized 2014 $ 661 $ 2013 2012 770 $ 347 See Note 21 regarding the announcement of our intention to acquire the remaining 51% of Zenith in 2015. International Home Furnishings Center In connection with the sale of our interest in International Home Furnishings Center, Inc. (“IHFC”) on May 2, 2011, to International Market Centers, L.P. (“IMC”), $6,106 of the sales proceeds were placed in escrow at the time of the sale to cover various contingencies. At various times during fiscal 2012, 2013 and 2014, the contingencies were satisfied without loss to the Company and the funds were released to us. The amounts collected in each year were as follows: Balance at November 26, 2011 Received in fiscal 2012 Balance at November 24, 2012 Received in fiscal 2013 Balance at November 30, 2013 Received in fiscal 2014 Balance at November 29, 2014 Total Escrow Receivable $ $ 6,106 (1,410) 4,696 (2,348) 2,348 (2,348) - The balance of $2,348 receivable at November 30, 2013 was included in other current assets in our consolidated balance sheet. In addition to the proceeds described above, at the time of the sale we acquired a minority interest in IMC in exchange for $1,000. IMC is majority owned by funds managed by Bain Capital Partners and a subsidiary of certain investment funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management, L.P, Our investment in IMC is included in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and is accounted for using the cost method as we do not have significant influence over IMC. 33 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 11. Income Taxes The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as follows: Current: Federal State Deferred: Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance Federal State Total 2014 2013 2012 $ 4,168 $ 596 759 $ 50 1,611 (487) (974) 221 1,297 5,308 $ 136 1,970 176 3,091 $ (18,704) 2,458 423 (14,699) $ Excess tax benefits in the amount of $300 and $313 were recognized as additional paid-in capital during fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, respectively, resulting from the exercise of stock options and the release of restricted shares. A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate, as a percentage of income before income taxes, is as follows: Statutory federal income tax rate Adjustments to state net operating loss carryforwards Change in income tax valuation allowance Change in income tax reserves State income tax, net of federal benefit Other Effective income tax rate 2014 2013 2012 35.0 % 3.3 (3.7) (1.7) 4.9 (1.5) 36.3 % 34.0 % - 1.7 0.1 3.7 (1.7 ) 37.8 % 35.0 % - (155.6) (3.3) 1.5 0.1 (122.3)% 34 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) The income tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards, which give rise to significant portions of the deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities, are as follows: November 29, 2014 November 30, 2013 $ Deferred income tax assets: Trade accounts receivable Inventories Property and equipment Notes receivable Retirement benefits State net operating loss carryforwards Unrealized loss from affiliates Lease termination accruals Net deferred rents Other Gross deferred income tax assets Valuation allowance Total deferred income tax assets Deferred income tax liabilities: Unrealized gains from affiliates Property and equipment Prepaid expenses and other Total deferred income tax liabilities 483 $ 2,384 - 1,599 6,093 1,141 595 167 2,251 1,699 16,412 (70) 16,342 963 282 128 1,373 618 2,277 756 1,592 5,626 2,482 988 349 1,256 1,142 17,086 (1,044) 16,042 755 - 135 890 Net deferred income tax assets $ 14,969 $ 15,152 Due to the losses incurred prior to fiscal 2011, we were in a cumulative loss position for the three years preceding fiscal 2011which is considered significant negative evidence that is difficult to overcome on a “more likely than not” standard through objectively verifiable data. While our long-term financial outlook remained positive, we concluded that our ability to rely on our long-term outlook and forecasts as to future taxable income was limited due to uncertainty created by the weight of the negative evidence. As a result, we previously recorded a valuation allowance on certain of the deferred tax assets. In fiscal 2011, due to the gain recognized on the sale of our interest in IHFC, we were able to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and credits to significantly offset the taxable gain, resulting in a $17,464 reduction of the valuation allowance. However, as the gain on the sale of IHFC did not represent a source of recurring future taxable income, we continued to record a valuation allowance against substantially all of our deferred tax assets as of November 26, 2011. Due to our positive earnings during fiscal 2012, and the absence of any significant negative evidence to the contrary, we concluded that we could rely on our positive long-term outlook and forecasts as to future taxable income in evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the reserve against the majority of our deferred tax assets was removed in fiscal 2012, resulting in a credit to income of $18,704, or $1.70 and $1.69 per basic and diluted share, respectively, which is included in our net income tax benefit for that year. The valuation allowance of $1,044 at November 30, 2013 was primarily related to state net operating loss carryforwards for which it was considered to be more likely than not that they would not be utilized prior to their expiration. During fiscal 2014 we reduced our valuation allowance related to adjustments to state net operating loss carryforwards primarily due to state tax law changes resulting in a credit to income of $974, or $0.09 per basic and diluted share. The remaining balance in the valuation allowance at November 29, 2014 was $70. 35 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) The following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets: 2014 2013 2012 Balance, beginning of the year Additions charged to expense Deductions reducing expense Balance, end of the year $ $ 1,044 $ - (974) 70 $ 908 $ 136 - 1,044 $ 19,612 - (18,704 ) 908 We have state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable state income of $22,439, which expire in varying amounts between 2015 and 2030. Realization is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the loss carryforwards. Income taxes paid, net of refunds received, during 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $2,367, $2,723, and $2,010, respectively. As of November 29, 2014, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $1,236 exclusive of interest and penalties. Of this balance, none would benefit the effective tax rate if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded. As of November 30, 2013, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $1,497, exclusive of interest and penalties. Of this balance, if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded, approximately $239 would benefit the effective tax rate. We regularly evaluate, assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances, which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period. The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits: Balance, beginning of the year $ Gross increases Gross decreases due to settlements Gross decreases primarily due to the expiration of statutes 2014 2013 2012 1,497 $ - (221) (40) 1,228 $ 401 - (132) 1,502 10 - (284) Balance, end of the year $ 1,236 $ 1,497 $ 1,228 We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, we recognized $7, $23, and $63 of interest expense recovery and $10, $31, and $57 of penalty expense recovery, respectively, related to the unrecognized benefits noted above in our consolidated statements of income. At November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, the consolidated balance sheets include accrued interest of $134 and $140, and penalties of $0 and $10, respectively, due to unrecognized tax benefits. At November 29, 2014,$1,370 representing the entire amount of our gross unrecognized tax benefits along with the accrued interest and penalties thereon is included in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as we believe it is likely these uncertain positions will be resolved in 2015. The corresponding balance as November 30, 2013 of $1,647 was included in other long-term liabilities. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company's federal and state tax positions and in the determination of its tax provision. Despite our belief that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is adequate, it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of the resolution of any particular tax matter. We may adjust these liabilities as relevant circumstances evolve, such as guidance from the relevant tax authority, or resolution of issues in the courts. These adjustments are recognized as a component of income tax expense in the period in which they are identified. The Company also cannot predict when or if any other future tax payments related to these tax positions may occur. We remain subject to examination for tax years 2011 through 2013 for all of our major tax jurisdictions. The Company’s fiscal 2012 and 2013 income tax returns are currently under examination by the IRS. 36 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) The IRS released the final and re-proposed tangible property regulations in September of 2013. While the regulations are now final, they are effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, which for the Company will be fiscal 2015. We have begun to evaluate the changes necessary to comply with the regulations and the related administrative procedures and the new regulations are not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements. 12. Real Estate Notes Payable and Bank Credit Facility Real Estate Notes Payable Real estate notes payable $ Current portion of real estate notes payable $ 2,218 $ (316) 1,902 $ 2,746 (279) 2,467 November 29, 2014 November 30, 2013 Certain of our retail real estate properties have been financed through commercial mortgages with an interest rate of 6.73%. These mortgages are collateralized by the respective properties with net book values totaling approximately $6,127 and $6,262 at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively. The current portion of these mortgages, $316 and $279 as of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively, has been included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The long-term portion, $1,902 and $2,467 as of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively, is presented as real estate notes payable in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these mortgages was $2,196 and $2,684 at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively. In determining the fair value we utilized current market interest rates for similar instruments. The inputs into these fair value calculations reflect our market assumptions and are not observable. Consequently, the inputs are considered to be Level 3 as specified in the fair value hierarchy in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. See Note 7. Maturities of real estate notes payable are as follows: Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2019 Thereafter $ $ 316 338 361 386 413 404 2,218 Bank Credit Facility On December 18, 2012, we entered into a new credit facility with our bank extending us a line of credit of up to $15,000. This credit facility, which matures in December 2015, is secured by our accounts receivable and inventory and contains certain covenants requiring us to maintain certain key financial ratios. We were in compliance with all covenants under the facility at November 29, 2014 and expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future. At November 29, 2014 we had $216 outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving availability under our credit line of $14,784. Total interest paid, including bank and mortgage debt, during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $176, $244 and $294, respectively. 37 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 13. Post-Employment Benefit Obligations Supplemental Retirement Income Plan We have an unfunded Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”) that covers one current and certain former executives. Upon retirement, the Supplemental Plan provides for lifetime monthly payments in an amount equal to 65% of the participant’s final average compensation as defined in the Supplemental Plan, which is reduced by certain social security benefits to be received and other benefits provided by us. The Supplemental Plan also provides a death benefit that is calculated as (a) prior to retirement death, which pays the beneficiary 50% of final average annual compensation for a period of 120 months, or (b) post-retirement death, which pays the beneficiary 200% of final average compensation in a single payment. We own life insurance policies on these executives with a current net death benefit of $3,148 at November 29, 2014 and we expect to substantially fund this death benefit through the proceeds received upon the death of the executive. Funding for the remaining cash flows is expected to be provided through operations. There are no benefits payable as a result of a termination of employment for any reason other than death or retirement, other than a change of control provision which provides for the immediate vesting and payment of the retirement benefit under the Supplemental Plan in the event of an employment termination resulting from a change of control. Summarized information for the plan measured as of the end of each year presented, is as follows: Change in Benefit Obligation: Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial losses Benefits paid Projected benefit obligation at end of year Accumulated Benefit Obligation 2014 2013 $ $ 9,775 $ 78 373 1,084 (934) 10,376 $ 9,805 71 350 434 (885) 9,775 $ 9,748 $ 9,215 Discount rate used to value the ending benefit obligations: 3.75% 4.00% Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet: Current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income: Transition obligation Actuarial loss Net amount recognized Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and accumulated other comprehensive income: $ $ $ $ 724 $ 9,652 10,376 $ 170 $ 3,046 3,216 $ 810 8,965 9,775 212 2,085 2,297 $ 1,535 $ 855 2014 2013 2012 Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost: Service cost Interest cost Amortization of transition obligation Amortization of other loss $ 78 $ 373 42 123 71 $ 350 42 81 54 376 42 11 Net periodic pension cost $ 616 $ 544 $ 483 38 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) Assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost: Discount rate Increase in future compensation levels 2014 2013 2012 4.00% 3.00% 3.75% 3.00% 4.25% 3.00% Estimated Future Benefit Payments (with mortality): Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2019 Fiscal 2020 through 2024 $ 724 695 667 639 610 3,432 Of the $3,216 recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at November 29, 2014, $42 of net transition obligation and $194 of net loss are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic pension cost during fiscal 2015. Deferred Compensation Plan We have an unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan that covers one current and certain former executives and provides for voluntary deferral of compensation. This plan has been frozen with no additional participants or benefits permitted. We recognized expense of $134, $288, and $312 in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, associated with the plan. The expense for fiscal 2014 is net of a credit to income of $124 due to a change in our estimate of the future obligation of a former employee. Our liability under this plan was $2,174 and $2,555 as of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively. The non-current portion of this obligation is included in post-employment benefit obligations in our consolidated balance sheets, with the current portion included in accrued compensation and benefits. Defined Contribution Plan We have a qualified defined contribution plan (Employee Savings/Retirement Plan) that covers substantially all employees who elect to participate and have fulfilled the necessary service requirements. Employee contributions to the Plan are matched at the rate of 15% of up to 8% of gross pay, regardless of years of service. Expense for employer matching contributions was $397, $340 and $175 during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 14. Capital Stock and Stock Compensation We account for our stock-based employee and director compensation plans in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. ASC 718 requires recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the financial statements over the period the employee is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively the vesting period) which we recognize on a straight-line basis. Compensation expense related to restricted stock and stock options included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was as follows: 2014 2013 2012 $ 951 $ 728 $ 636 Stock Option Plans In 1997, we adopted an Employee Stock Plan (the “1997 Plan”), and reserved for issuance 950,000 shares of common stock. An additional 500,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance in 2000. In addition, the terms of the 1997 Plan allow for the re-issuance of any stock options which have been forfeited before being exercised. Options granted under the 1997 Plan may be for such terms and exercised at such times as determined by the Organization, Compensation, and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors. Vesting periods typically range from one to three years. There are no shares available for grant under the 1997 Plan at November 29, 2014, however up to 500,000 shares associated with outstanding grants under the 1997 may become available for grant under the 2010 Plan (see below). 39 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) On April 14, 2010, our shareholders approved the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). All present and future non-employee directors, key employees and outside consultants for the Company are eligible to receive incentive awards under the 2010 Plan. Our Organization, Compensation and Nominating Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) selects eligible key employees and outside consultants to receive awards under the 2010 Plan in its discretion. Our Board of Directors or any committee designated by the Board of Directors selects eligible non- employee directors to receive awards under the 2010 Plan in its discretion. Five hundred thousand (500,000) shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the 2010 Plan. In addition, up to 500,000 shares that are represented by outstanding awards under the 1997 Employee Stock Plan which are forfeited, expire or are canceled after the effective date of the 2010 Plan will be added to the reserve and may be used for new awards under the 2010 Plan. Participants may receive the following types of incentive awards under the 2010 Plan: stock options, stock appreciation rights, payment shares, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares. Stock options may be incentive stock options or non- qualified stock options. Stock appreciation rights may be granted in tandem with stock options or as a freestanding award. Non-employee directors and outside consultants are eligible to receive restricted stock and restricted stock units only. We expect to issue new common stock upon the exercise of options. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate for the expected life at the time of grant, volatility is based on the average long-term implied volatilities of peer companies, the expected life is based on the estimated average of the life of options using the simplified method, and forfeitures are estimated on the date of grant based on certain historical data. We utilize the simplified method to determine the expected life of our options due to insufficient exercise activity during recent years as a basis from which to estimate future exercise patterns. There were no new grants of options made in 2014, 2013 or 2012. Changes in the outstanding options under our plans during the year ended November 29, 2014 were as follows: Outstanding at November 30, 2013 Granted Exercised Forfeited/Expired Outstanding at November 29, 2014 Exercisable at November 29, 2014 Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share 735,100 $ - (32,850) (265,000) 437,250 414,500 $ 15.08 - 9.65 20.92 11.94 12.16 Changes in the non-vested options under our plans during the year ended November 29, 2014 were as follows: Non-vested options outstanding at November 30, 2013 Granted Vested Forfeited/Expired Non-vested options outstanding at November 29, 2014 Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share 86,500 $ - (63,750) - 22,750 $ 6.31 - 5.69 - 8.04 Unrecognized compensation cost related to these non-vested options at November 29, 2014 is $49, all of which is expected to be recognized during fiscal 2015. 40 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) Additional information regarding our outstanding stock options at November 29, 2014 is as follows: Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Range of Exercise Prices $3.23 - $6.45 $6.45 - $9.67 $9.68 - $12.90 $12.91 - $16.13 $16.14 - $19.35 Shares 68,000 62,750 104,000 52,500 150,000 437,250 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 5.6 6.5 2.9 2.4 1.6 $ Weighted Average Exercise Price 4.38 8.03 10.60 14.73 16.96 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 4.38 8.03 10.60 14.89 16.96 Shares 68,000 40,000 104,000 52,500 150,000 414,500 Aggregate intrinsic value $ 3,349 $ 3,084 Additional information regarding activity in our stock options during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows: Total intrinsic value of options exercised Total fair value of options vested Total cash received from the exercise of options Excess tax benefits recognized as additional paid-in capital upon $ the exercise of options 2014 2013 2012 236 $ 200 382 72 387 $ 363 413 106 530 371 536 - Restricted Shares Changes in the outstanding non-vested restricted shares during the year ended November 29, 2014 were as follows: Non-vested restricted shares outstanding at November 30, 2013 Granted Vested and released Forfeited Non-vested restricted shares outstanding at November 29, 2014 Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share 165,893 $ 66,339 (108,495) - 123,737 $ 12.23 14.21 9.96 - 15.28 Restricted share awards granted in fiscal 2014 included the grant of 54,000 shares on January 15, 2014 which were subject to a performance condition as well as a service condition. The performance condition was based on a measure of the Company’s operating cash flow for 2014 and has now been satisfied. Shares will be issued on the first anniversary. They will remain subject to an additional two-year service requirement and will vest on the third anniversary of the grant. The remaining grants for 2014 consisted of 12,399 restricted shares granted to our non-employee directors on April 1, 2014 which will vest on the first anniversary of the grant. 41 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) During fiscal 2014, 108,495 restricted shares were vested and released, of which 97,200 shares had been granted to employees and 11,295 shares to directors. Of the shares released to employees, 31,234 shares were withheld by the Company to cover withholding taxes of $489. During fiscal 2013, 11,550 shares were withheld to cover withholding taxes of $202 arising from the vesting of restricted shares. Excess tax benefits of $228 and $207 were recognized during fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively, as additional paid-in capital upon the release of vested shares. Activity related to the vesting and release of restricted shares prior to fiscal 2013 was not material. Additional information regarding our outstanding non-vested restricted shares at November 29, 2014 is as follows: Grant Date July 13, 2012 July 17, 2013 January 15, 2014 April 1, 2014 Restricted Shares Granted Share Value at Grant Date Per Share Remaining Restriction Period (Years) 1,398 $ 56,000 54,000 12,339 123,737 11.69 16.64 14.12 14.59 0.6 3.6 2.1 0.3 Unrecognized compensation cost related to these non-vested restricted shares at November 29, 2014 is $1,403, expected to be recognized over approximately a three and one-half year period. Employee Stock Purchase Plan In 2000, we adopted and implemented an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) that allows eligible employees to purchase a limited number of shares of our stock at 85% of market value. Under the ESPP we sold 25,677, 38,206 and 42,211 shares to employees in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which resulted in an immaterial amount of compensation expense. 15. Restructuring, asset impairment, and other charges During 2012, our income from operations included the following charges: Restructuring and asset impairment charges: Asset impairment charges related to Company-owned retail store closures Asset impairment charges & demolition costs associated with closed plants Total restructuring and asset impairment charges Lease exit costs Lease exit costs related to Company-owned retail store closures Changes in estimates related to previously closed Company-owned retail stores Total lease exit costs Total charges related to restructuring, asset impairment, lease exit costs and debt cancellation included in loss from operations $ $ $ $ $ 123 588 711 228 131 359 1,070 Of the total restructuring, asset impairment charges and lease exit costs incurred in 2012, $719 was incurred in our wholesale segment while $351 was incurred in our retail segment. 42 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) The following table summarizes the activity related to our accrued lease exit costs: Balance, beginning of the year Provisions made to adjust previous estimates Payments on unexpired leases Accretion of interest on obligations Balance, end of the year Current portion included in other accrued liabilities Long-term portion included in other long-term liabilities 2014 2013 $ $ $ $ 907 $ 14 (510) 22 433 $ 117 $ 316 433 $ 2,614 (176) (1,610) 79 907 474 433 907 Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges During fiscal 2012, we incurred costs of $203 associated with the demolition of a previously closed manufacturing facility in Bassett, Virginia; non-cash charges of $385 associated with the write-down of a previously closed manufacturing facility in Mt. Airy, North Carolina; and $123 associated with the write off of abandoned leasehold improvements following the relocation of a retail store near Richmond, Virginia. Lease Exit Costs During fiscal 2012, we incurred non-cash charges of $228 for lease exit costs associated with the relocation of a retail store near Richmond, Virginia, as well as $131 of non-cash charges to reflect reduced estimates of recoverable lease costs at several previously closed retail locations. 16. Contingencies We are involved in various claims and actions, including environmental matters, which arise in the normal course of business. Although the final outcome of these matters cannot be determined, based on the facts presently known, it is our opinion that the final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or future results of operations. 17. Leases and Lease Guarantees Leases We lease land and buildings under operating leases that are used in the operation of our Company-owned retail stores as well as in the operation of independent licensee BHF stores. Our decision to exercise renewal options is primarily dependent on the level of business conducted at the location and the profitability thereof. Some store leases contain contingent rental provisions based upon sales volume. Lease terms range from one to 15 years and generally have renewal options of between five and 15 years. The following schedule shows future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of November 29, 2014: Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2019 Thereafter $ $ 18,243 15,713 13,194 10,778 8,984 25,646 92,558 43 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) Lease expense was $19,903, $18,403 and $17,123 for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. In addition to subleasing certain of these properties, we own retail real estate which we in turn lease to licensee operators of BHF stores. We also own real estate for closed stores which we lease to non-licensees. The following schedule shows minimum future rental income related to pass-through rental expense on subleased property as well as rental income on real estate owned by Bassett. Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2019 Thereafter $ $ 2,688 1,781 1,406 869 252 132 7,128 Real estate rental income (loss), net of expense (including lease costs, depreciation, insurance, and taxes), related to licensee stores and other investment real estate, was $(248), $(594) and $(468) in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is reflected in other expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Guarantees As part of the strategy for our store program, we have guaranteed certain lease obligations of licensee operators. Lease guarantees range from one to ten years. We were contingently liable under licensee lease obligation guarantees in the amount of $3,164 and $3,698 at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, respectively. In the event of default by an independent dealer under the guaranteed lease, we believe that the risk of loss is mitigated through a combination of options that include, but are not limited to, arranging for a replacement dealer, liquidating the collateral, and pursuing payment under the personal guarantees of the independent dealer. The proceeds of the above options are estimated to cover the maximum amount of our future payments under the guarantee obligations, net of reserves. The fair value of lease guarantees (an estimate of the cost to the Company to perform on these guarantees) at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, were not material. 18. Earnings Per Share The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share: Numerator: Net income Denominator: 2014 2013 2012 $ 9,299 $ 5,096 $ 26,713 Denominator for basic income per share - weighted average shares Effect of dilutive securities Denominator for diluted income per share — weighted average 10,552,462 140,569 10,721,652 150,897 10,992,017 103,394 shares and assumed conversions 10,693,031 10,872,549 11,095,411 Basic income per share: Net income per share — basic Diluted income per share: Net income per share — diluted 0.88 $ 0.48 $ 2.43 0.87 $ 0.47 $ 2.41 $ $ 44 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) For fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, the following potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the computations as there effect was anti-dilutive: Stock options Unvested restricted shares 2014 2013 2012 150,000 - 472,500 81,295 622,500 12,582 Total anti-dilutive securities 150,000 553,795 635,082 19. Segment Information We have strategically aligned our business into three reportable segments as defined in ASC 280, Segment Reporting, and as described below: ● Wholesale. The wholesale home furnishings segment is involved principally in the design, manufacture, sourcing, sale and distribution of furniture products to a network of Bassett stores (Company-owned and licensee-owned stores retail stores) and independent furniture retailers. Our wholesale segment includes our wood and upholstery operations as well as all corporate selling, general and administrative expenses, including those corporate expenses related to both Company- and licensee-owned stores. ● Retail – Company-owned Stores. Our retail segment consists of Company-owned stores and includes the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities (including real estate) and capital expenditures directly related to these stores. ● Investments and Real Estate. Our investments and real estate segment consists of our short-term investments, our holdings of real estate leased or previously leased as licensee stores, and our equity investment in Zenith. We also hold an investment in Fortress, which we fully reserved during the first quarter of 2012. Although this segment does not have operating earnings, income or loss from the segment is included in other income (loss), net, in our consolidated statements of income. Inter-company net sales elimination represents the elimination of wholesale sales to our Company-owned stores. Inter- company income elimination includes the embedded wholesale profit in the Company-owned store inventory that has not been realized. These profits will be recorded when merchandise is delivered to the retail consumer. The inter-company income elimination also includes rent paid by our retail stores occupying Company-owned real estate. 45 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) The following table presents segment information for each of the last three fiscal years: Net Sales Wholesale Retail Inter-company elimination Consolidated Income (loss) from Operations Wholesale Retail Inter-company elimination Restructuring and asset impairment charges Wholesale Retail Lease exit costs Consolidated income (loss) from operations Depreciation and Amortization Wholesale Retail Investments and real estate Consolidated Capital Expenditures Wholesale Retail Investments and real estate Consolidated Identifiable Assets Wholesale Retail Investments and real estate Consolidated 2014 2013 2012 223,993 $ 216,631 (99,886) 340,738 $ 215,451 $ 199,380 (93,545) 321,286 $ 185,187 171,633 (87,148) 269,672 14,120 $ (528) 1,539 - - - 15,131 $ 1,572 $ 5,344 400 7,316 $ 4,527 $ 13,836 - 18,363 $ 10,883 $ (1,452) 574 - - - 10,005 $ 1,342 $ 4,372 484 6,198 $ 3,839 $ 10,846 - 14,685 $ 7,500 (2,067) 717 (588) (123) (359) 5,080 1,171 3,760 542 5,473 3,092 5,898 10 9,000 124,848 $ 86,471 29,427 240,746 $ 109,958 $ 77,331 38,560 225,849 $ 145,861 68,583 12,736 227,180 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ A breakdown of wholesale sales by product category for each of the last three fiscal years is provided below: Wood Upholstery 2014 39% 61% 100% 2013 41% 59% 100% 2012 43% 57% 100% 46 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -Continued (In thousands, except share and per share data) 20. Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited) Net sales Gross profit Net income Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share First Quarter (1)(2) $ 75,647 $ 40,253 843 0.08 0.08 2014 Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 85,186 $ 45,018 2,256 0.22 0.21 94,720 51,837 3,649 0.35 0.35 85,185 $ 45,313 2,551 0.24 0.24 2013 First Quarter (1) Second Quarter Third Quarter (3) Fourth Quarter (4) Net sales Gross profit Net income (loss) Basic earnings (loss) per share Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 79,849 $ 41,360 980 0.09 0.09 81,223 $ 41,826 1,953 0.18 0.18 77,152 $ 38,723 556 0.05 0.05 83,062 44,085 1,607 0.15 0.15 The first quarter of fiscal 2013 includes 14 weeks. All other quarters presented above for fiscal 2013 and 2012 consist of 13 week fiscal periods. (1) The first quarter of fiscal 2014 included 13 weeks as compared with 14 weeks for the first quarter of 2013. On an average weekly basis, net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 were $5,819 per week as compared with $5,704 per week for the first quarter of fiscal 2013. (2) Includes $662 of income from death benefits from life insurance policies covering a former executive and a $140 gain from the partial liquidation of our investment in Fortress (see Note 7) (3) Includes $221 of tax benefit from the expiration of the statute of limitations on certain previously unrecognized tax benefits – see Note 11 for further information. (4) Includes $416 charge for impairment related to our investment property located in Henderson, Nevada. See Note 15 for further details 21. Subsequent Event On January 21, 2015 we announced our intention to acquire the remaining 51% of Zenith Freight Lines, LLC in a transaction that is expected to close during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The purchase price is valued at $20,000 to be paid in increments of cash and Bassett common stock over a three year period. See Note 10 regarding our current 49% interest in Zenith. 47 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The selected financial data set forth below for the fiscal years indicated were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements (including the notes thereto) and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere in, or incorporated by reference into, this report. 2014 2013 (1) 2012 2011 2010 Net sales Gross profit Operating income (loss) Gain on sale of affiliate Other income (loss), net Income (loss) before income taxes Income tax expense (benefit) Net income (loss) Diluted earnings (loss) per share Cash dividends declared Cash dividends per share Total assets Long-term debt Current ratio Book value per share $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 340,738 $ 182,421 $ 15,131 $ - $ (524) $ 14,607 $ 5,308 $ 9,299 $ 0.87 $ 5,085 $ 0.48 $ 240,746 $ 1,902 $ 2.03 to 1 14.95 $ 321,286 $ 165,994 $ 10,005 $ - $ (1,818) $ 8,187 $ 3,091 $ 5,096 $ 0.47 $ 4,565 $ 0.42 $ 225,849 $ 2,467 $ 2.46 to 1 14.50 $ 269,672 141,322 $ $ 5,080 (2) $ - $ 6,934 (4) $ $ 12,014 (14,699) (5) $ $ 26,713 $ 2.41 $ 15,920 $ 1.45 $ 227,180 3,053 $ 2.52 to 1 14.51 $ 253,208 $ $ 127,566 (20,622) (2) $ 85,542 (3) $ (5,169) (4) $ $ 59,571 $ (4,409) $ 55,342 $ 4.79 $ 6,757 $ 0.60 $ 223,174 3,662 $ 2.71 to 1 13.44 $ 235,254 112,688 (4,687) - 2,479 (4) (2,208) 206 (2,002) (0.17) - - 197,317 4,295 1.48 to 1 9.20 (1) Fiscal 2013 contained 53 weeks, whereas all other fiscal years presented above contained 52 weeks. (2) See note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements related to restructuring and asset impairment charges and lease exits costs of $1,070 recorded in 2012. Fiscal 2011 included restructuring and asset impairment charges of $6,228 as well as licensee debt cancellation charges of $6,447. (3) On May 2, 2011 we sold our 46.9% interest in International Home Furnishings Center, Inc. (“IHFC”) resulting in a gain of $85,542. (4) See note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements related to funds received from the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (“CDSOA”) in 2012 of $9,010. During 2011 and 2010, other income (loss), net included income from the CDSOA of $765 and $488, respectively. (5) See note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements related to the effects of changes in our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets during fiscal 2012. 48 Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated Schedule II Analysis of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts For the Years Ended November 29, 2014, November 30, 2013 and November 24, 2012 (amounts in thousands) Balance Beginning of Period Additions Charged to Cost and Expenses Deductions (1) Other Balance End of Period For the Year Ended November 24, 2012: Reserve deducted from assets to which it applies Allowance for doubtful accounts Notes receivable valuation reserves Income tax valuation allowance $ $ $ For the Year Ended November 30, 2013: Reserve deducted from assets to which it applies Allowance for doubtful accounts Notes receivable valuation reserves Income tax valuation allowance $ $ $ For the Year Ended November 29, 2014: Reserve deducted from assets to which it applies Allowance for doubtful accounts Notes receivable valuation reserves Income tax valuation allowance $ $ $ 2,092 $ 377 $ (680) $ - $ 1,789 4,140 $ (1) $ - $ - $ 4,139 19,612 $ - $ (18,704) $ - $ 908 1,789 $ 361 $ (543) $ - $ 1,607 4,139 $ - $ 908 $ 136 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,139 - $ 1,044 1,607 $ 77 $ (435) $ - $ 1,249 4,139 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,139 1,044 $ - $ (974) $ - $ 70 (1) Deductions are for the purpose for which the reserve was created. Deductions from the income tax valuation allowance for the years ended November 24, 2012 and November 29, 2014 were due to the removal of the majority of our valuation allowance, resulting in a net tax benefit for the year. 49 STOCKHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH Presented below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s Common Stock against the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the Company’s peer group. The Company’s peer group consists of the following: American Woodmark, Inc. Culp, Inc. The Dixie Group, Inc. Ethan Allan Interiors, Inc. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. Hooker Furniture Corporation Kirkland’s, Inc. La-Z-Boy Incorporated Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. This graph assumes that $100 was invested on November 28, 2009 in the Company’s Common Stock, the S&P Index and the two peer groups and that any dividends paid were invested. Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return Assumes Initial Investment of $100 November 2014 Assumes $100 Invested on November 28, 2009 Assumes Dividends Reinvested 50 Management’s Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (“Disclosure Controls”). Disclosure Controls, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Based upon their controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our Disclosure Controls are effective at a reasonable assurance level. We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. With the participation of our CEO and CFO, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of November 29, 2014 based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of November 29, 2014, based on those criteria. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. Bassett, Virginia January 22, 2014 51 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 29, 2014. Our audits also included Financial Statement Schedule II - Analysis of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three years in the period ended November 29, 2014. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries at November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 29, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of November 29, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework), and our report dated January 22, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Richmond, Virginia January 22, 2015 52 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries We have audited Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of November 29, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 29, 2014, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of November 29, 2014 and November 30, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 29, 2014 of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries and our report dated January 22, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Richmond, Virginia January 22, 2015 53 This Page Intentionally Left Blank This Page Intentionally Left Blank INVESTOR INFORMATION Internet Site Our site on the Internet has been updated recently and is filled with information about Bassett Furniture, including this annual report, detailed financial information and updates, information about our home furnishings products, and a dealer locator of Bassett stores and other stores that feature Bassett products. Visit us at bassettfurniture.com. Forward Looking Statements This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation and Reform Act of 1995 and within the meaning of Sections 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. When used in this Annual Report the words “hope,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan” or “planned,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned against placing undue reliance on these statements. Such statements, including but not limited to those regarding increases in sales, growth in the number of Bassett stores, improving gross margins, growth in earnings per share, changes in capital structure, the operating performance of licensed Bassett stores, and other Company-owned stores, are based upon management’s beliefs, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management, and involve various risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward- looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company. If the Company does not attain its goals, its business and results of operations might be adversely affected. For a discussion of factors that may impair the Company’s ability to achieve its goals, please see the cautionary statements in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of this Annual Report. Corporate Information and Investor Inquiries Our annual report and proxy statement together contain much of the information presented in the Form 10-K report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Individuals who wish to receive the Form 10-K or other corporate literature should visit our website at bassettfurniture.com or contact Investor Relations, at 276.629.6000. Transfer Agent - Stockholder Inquiries Stockholders with inquiries relating to stockholder records, stock transfers, change of ownership, change of address or dividend payments should write to: American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC Operations Center 6201 15th Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11219 Toll free: (800) 937-5449 Local & International: (718) 921-8124 Email: info@amstock.com Web site: www.amstock.com Annual Meeting The Bassett Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held Wednesday, March 11, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. EST at the Company’s headquarters in Bassett, Va. Market and Dividend Information Bassett’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ national market system under the symbol “BSET.” We had approximately 1300 registered stockholders on November 29, 2014. The range of per share amounts for the high and low market prices and dividends declared for the last two fiscal years are listed below: MARKET PRICES OF COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS DECLARED Quarter 2014 2013 2014 2013 HIGH LOW HIGH LOW First $16.19 $13.32 $14.60 $10.93 $0.06 $0.05 Second Third 16.02 15.73 13.13 12.07 15.96 17.49 12.52 13.82 Fourth 19.60 13.21 16.19 13.18 0.06 0.08 0.28 0.05 0.06 0.26 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAUL FULTON Chairman of the Board Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. ROBERT H. SPILMAN, JR. President and Chief Executive Officer Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. PETER W. BROWN, M.D. Retired Partner Virginia Surgical Associates KRISTINA K. CASHMAN President Guy and Larry Restaurants, LLC HOWARD H. HAWORTH Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Drexel Heritage Home Furnishings GEORGE W. HENDERSON, III Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Burlington Industries, Inc. OFFICERS J. WALTER MCDOWELL Former Chief Executive Officer Carolinas/Virginia Banking Wachovia Corporation DALE C. POND Retired Senior Executive Vice President Merchandising and Marketing Lowe’s Companies, Inc. WILLIAM C. WAMPLER, JR. Executive Director, New College Institute Former Member, Senate of Virginia WILLIAM C. WARDEN, JR. Former Executive Vice President Lowe’s Companies, Inc. ROBERT H. SPILMAN, JR. President and Chief Executive Officer JAy R. HERvEy Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Real Estate JOHN E. BASSETT, III Senior Vice President, Wood MATTHEW S. JOHNSON Vice President, Sales, Bassett and HGTV JASON W. CAMP Senior Vice President, Retail and Marketing MIKE R. KREIDLER Vice President, Upholstery Operations BRUCE R. COHENOUR Senior Vice President, Sales and Merchandising KENA A. LENARD Vice President, Textile and Accessory Merchandising J. MICHAEL DANIEL Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer PETER D. MORRISON Vice President, Marketing MARK S. JORDAN Senior Vice President, Upholstery LOUIS C. MOSSOTTI, JR. Vice President, Corporate Retail – Southeast Region EDWIN C. AvERy, JR. Vice President, Upholstery Product Development THOMAS E. PRATO Vice President, Sales, Bassett and HGTV DAvID C. BAKER Vice President, Corporate Retail J. CARTER UNDERWOOD Vice President, Wood Operations WILLIAM A. BENDALL Vice President, Sales, Export and Juvenile DAvID F. WALSH Vice President, Licensed Retail STEPHEN D. HARMON Vice President, Information Technology EDWARD H. WHITE Vice President, Human Resources BASSETT, VIRGINIA NASDAQ: BSET
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above