Quarterlytics / Energy / Coal / Bisichi PLC

Bisichi PLC

bisi · LSE Energy
Claim this profile
Ticker bisi
Exchange LSE
Sector Energy
Industry Coal
Employees 201-500
← All annual reports
FY2021 Annual Report · Bisichi PLC
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Bisichi PLC Annual Report 2021

Contents

 Principal activity, strategy & business model

STRATEGIC REPORT 
2   Chairman’s Statement
4 
5  Mining Review
7  Sustainable development
11  Principal risks & uncertainties
16  Financial & performance review 

GOVERNANCE
23 Directors and advisors
24 Five year summary
24 Financial calendar
25 Directors’ report
31   Statement of the Chairman of the remuneration committee
32 Annual remuneration report
40 Audit committee report
42 Valuers’ certificates
43 Directors’ responsibilities statement
44 Independent auditor’s report 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
54 Consolidated income statement
55 Consolidated statement of other comprehensive income
56 Consolidated balance sheet
58  Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity
59 Consolidated cash flow statement
60 Group accounting policies
68 Notes to the financial statements
94 Company balance sheet
95 Company statement of changes in equity
96 Company accounting policies

Strategic report
The Directors present the 
Strategic Report of the company 
for the year ending 31 December 
2021. The aim of the Strategic 
Report is to provide shareholders 
with the ability to assess how the 
Directors have performed their 
duty to promote the success of 
the company for the collective 
benefit of shareholders.

Bisichi PLC

11

 
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Chairman’s Statement
In the wake of the challenges arising from the Covid-19 pandemic, I am pleased to 
report to shareholders that for the year ended 31 December 2021, your company 
made a profit before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of 
£5.8million (2020: loss: £2.4 million) and an operating profit before depreciation, 
fair value adjustments and exchange movements (Adjusted EBITDA) of £5.0million 
(2020: loss: £1.1million). £4.3million in adjusted EBITDA is attributable to the 
second half of the year.

As we reflect back on the last two years, 
the most challenging priority for your 
Company was the continuity of our  
South African mining and processing 
operations, particularly during the peak  
of the Covid-19 pandemic. In early 2020, 
when global coal demand fell, the 
average weekly price of Free on Board 
(FOB) coal from Richards Bay Coal 
Terminal (API4 price) fell from a high  
of US$92 in January 2020 to $44 in 
mid-April 2020. Thereafter, prices 
remained largely supressed until the end 
of the year. Under these very difficult 
circumstances, your management worked 
tirelessly, along with our key stakeholders, 
to ensure that our South African 
operations continued operating in an 
efficient manner until global economic 
activity and our markets improved. 

As 2021 unfolded, an improvement in 
global economic activity had a significant 
impact on demand for coal in the 
international market, alleviating many  
of the challenges our South African 
operations faced in 2020. Strong demand 
for coal in the seaborne market resulted 
in significantly higher API4 prices, 
particularly in the second half of the year 
when the price peaked at over $245 in 
October. Overall, the API4 price averaged 
$125 in 2021 compared to $65 in 2020. 

Despite constraints in transporting  
coal for export on the South African rail 
network, constraints which were largely 
beyond our control, at Sisonke Coal 
Processing (our South African coal 
processing operation), we were able  
to take advantage of the improved 
international coal price by increasing our 
export sales during the year to 320,000 
metric tonnes (2020: 230,000 metric 
tonnes). The overall increase in Group 
revenue, operating costs and earnings 
during the year is mainly attributable  
to our coal processing operations. 

The overall performance of our South 
African operations would have been even 
better if we had not encountered some 
difficult mining conditions at Black Wattle, 
our South African mining operation, 
which impacted adversely our coal 
production during the period. Overall,  
the mine achieved production of 
1.04million metric tonnes compared to 
1.18million metric tonnes in 2020. 

During the year we continued to work 
closely with Vunani Mining, our BEE 
partner in Black Wattle, to seek further 
opportunities to extend the life of mine at 
Black Wattle. At the end of last year, 
Black Wattle signed an agreement to 
acquire an additional coal reserve 
contiguous to Black Wattle which 

required further drilling to ascertain its 
commercial viability and indicative size. 
We are very pleased to report that the 
recently concluded geological assessment 
indicates an expected run of mine tonnage 
of 6.1million metric tonnes. This reserve 
will be mined by opencast methods, the 
coal will be processed at Sisonke Coal 
Processing, and then sold into our 
existing markets. This new reserve, which 
is subject to regulatory approval, will 
extend Black Wattle’s life of mine to eight 
years. Vunani Mining played a key role in 
acquiring these reserves, and will share 
equally in any distributable income as 
part of their non-controlling interest in 
Black Wattle. Further details of this 
acquisition can be found in our Mining 
and Financial and Performance Reviews.         

Looking forward, we expect the Group’s 
mining production to improve further 
once we complete our transition into new 
mining areas at Black Wattle in the first 
half of 2022. In addition, we have seen 
coal market conditions continue to 
improve in 2022 to date. In the first 
quarter of this year, the weekly API4 price 
averaged $238 and exports from our 
South African operations in the first 
quarter of 2022 have been in line with the 
average export tonnages we achieved in 
2021. However, looking beyond the first 

2 Bisichi PLC

Strategic Report 

quarter, uncertainties remain, particularly 
with regard to the international coal  
price and the impact of constraints in  
transporting coal for export on the South 
African rail network. 

In the UK, despite the Covid-19 pandemic, 
we have seen rental revenue from our 
retail property portfolio remain stable in 
2021. Overall, the Group billed revenue 
from our directly owned property portfolio 
of £1.12million (2020: £1.18million) during 
the year. The Group continues to hold its 
joint venture investment, with London & 
Associated Properties PLC and Metroprop 
Real Estate Ltd, in the freehold of a retail 
and residential redevelopment in West 
Ealing, London. As previously announced, 
planning permission for an expanded 
residential redevelopment of 56 flats  
on the site has been received. Planning 
approval documents for the planning 
consent are currently being finalised and 
we look forward to updating shareholders 
further on the situation in due course. 

Finally, in light of the strong results 
achieved for the year and in 2022 to 
date, your directors believe the company 
has the financial strength to recommence 
distribution of dividends to shareholders. 
For the year ended 31 December 2021 
the directors recommend a dividend of 
4p (2020: Nil) per share and a special 
dividend of 2p (2020: Nil) per share. The 
dividends will be payable on Friday 29 
July 2022 to shareholders registered at 
the close of business on 8 July 2022. 

On behalf of the Board and shareholders, 
I would like to thank all of our staff for 
their hard work and dedication during 
the course of a difficult year.

Sir Michael Heller  
Chairman

13 April 2022

Bisichi PLC

33
33

  
Strategic Report
Principal activity, strategy  
& business model
The company carries on business as a mining company and its principal activity is 
coal mining in South Africa. The company’s strategy is to create and deliver long term 
sustainable value to all our stakeholders through our business model which can be 
broken down into three key areas:

1

2

3

Production & 
sustainability 
The Group strives to mine its 
South African coal reserves in 
an economical and sustainable 
manner that delivers long term 
value to all our stakeholders.

Processing & 
marketing
The Group seeks to achieve 
value from its South African coal 
processing infrastructure through 
the washing, transportation and 
marketing of coal into both the 
domestic and export markets. 

Acquisition & 
investment

The Group actively seeks new 
opportunities to extend the life of its 
existing mining and processing 
operations in South Africa. The 
Group aims to achieve this through 
new commercial arrangements and 
the acquisition of additional coal 
reserves nearby to our existing 
mining operations. 

In addition, we seek to balance the 
high risk of our mining operations 
with a dependable cash flow from our 
UK property investment operations 
and listed equity investment 
portfolios. The company primarily 
invests in retail property across the 
UK as well as residential property 
development. The UK Retail property 
portfolio is managed by London & 
Associated Properties PLC whose 
responsibility is to actively manage 
the portfolio to improve rental income 
and thus enhance the value of the 
portfolio over time.

4 Bisichi PLC

Strategic Report 
Mining review
We are pleased to report that, after a challenging 2020, higher prices for our coal have 
accelerated the recovery of our South African operations in 2021. Although we continued 
to manage the health and safety impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Group’s 
mining and processing operations in South Africa, business conditions significantly 
improved in 2021. Looking forward into 2022, to date we have continued to see higher 
coal prices contributing strongly to the performance of our South African operations. 

Covid-19 update
The Group continues to consult with the 
government authorities and its 
stakeholders in South Africa to ensure 
appropriate measures are taken across its 
South African mining and processing 
operations. Such measures have been 
primarily focussed on the health and 
safety of our employees. Further details 
on these measures can be found in our 
Sustainability report on page 7.

Production and operations 
Difficult mining conditions at Black Wattle, 
our South African mining operation, 
impacted production in 2021. Overall, the 
mine achieved production of 1.04 million 
metric tonnes compared to 1.18 million 
metric tonnes in 2020. Looking forward, 
the mine will be transitioning into new coal 
reserves over the first half of 2022 where 
mining conditions and production capacity 
is expected to improve in comparison to 
the reserves mined in 2021. Although 
mining production may be impacted in the 
first half of 2022, mining production is 
expected to improve once this transition 
to the new reserves is complete. Overall, 
we expect the Group’s mining production 
in 2022 to remain at similar levels to 2021.

As noted in the Chairman’s statement, we 
are very pleased to report the acquisition 
of 6.1 million metric tonnes of coal reserves 
contiguous to Black Wattle. The new 
reserve, which is currently subject to 
regulatory approval, will extend the life of 
mine of Black Wattle to eight years. The 
acquisition was negotiated in conjunction 
with a re-negotiation of 2.1million metric 
tonnes of separate coal reserves previously 
acquired from the same seller, as 
announced in our 2018 annual report. In 
addition to a nominal financial consideration, 
an option for offtake of processed coal from 
both reserves has been entered into with 
the seller. We would like to thank Vunani 
Mining, our Black Economic Empowered 
shareholders at Black Wattle, for their 
significant contribution in acquiring these 
reserves. In light of their integral 
involvement, it has been agreed that 
Vunani Mining will share equally in any 
distributable income from the coal 
reserves as part of their non-controlling 
interest in Black Wattle. This has been 
achieved through the issue of new shares 
in Black Wattle. Further details on the 
share issue can be found in the Financial 
and Performance Review on page 16. 

Main trends/markets 
Improvement in global economic activity 
had a significant impact on demand and 
prices achievable for our coal in 2021. In 
the international market the average 
weekly price of Free On Board (FOB) Coal 
from Richard Bay Coal Terminal (API4 
price) averaged $125 in 2021 compared 
to $65 in 2020 when coal prices and 
economic activity remained largely 
supressed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. 

The higher prices, along with a stable US 
Dollar compared to the South African 
Rand, resulted in the Group achieving an 
overall average Rand price of R1,129 per 
tonne of export coal sold from the mine in 
2021 compared to R547 in 2020. The 
Group’s export sales are via Richards Bay 
Coal Terminal, primarily under the Quattro 
programme which allows junior black-
economic empowerment coal producers 
direct access to the coal export market via 
the terminal. Although our export volumes 
to Richards Bay were limited by industry 
constraints in transporting coal for export 
on the South African rail network, overall 
exports volumes from our South African 
operations increased during the year to 
320,000 metric tonnes compared to 
230,000 metric tonnes in 2020. 

Bisichi PLC

55

Strategic Report Principal activity, strategy & business model 

Prospects 
Management would like to thank all our 
employees and stakeholders in helping 
overcome many of the unprecedented 
challenges presented by the Covid-19 
pandemic over the last two years. Going 
forward, I am confident that 2022 should 
be another successful year for our South 
African operations. 

Andrew Heller  
Managing Director

13 April 2022

Sustainable development 
The Group’s South African operations 
continue to strive to conduct business in a 
safe, environmentally and socially 
responsible manner. Some highlights of 
our Health, Safety and Environment 
performance in 2021:
• 
• 

  The Group’s South African operations 
recorded two Lost time Injuries during 
2021 (2020: One). 
  No cases of Occupational Diseases 
were recorded. 
  Zero claims for the Compensation for 
Occupational Diseases were submitted.

• 
• 

• 
• 

In South Africa, the new government 
regulated Broad-Based Socio-Economic 
Empowerment Charter for the Mining and 
Minerals Industry, 2020 (New Mining 
Charter) came into force from March 
2020. The New Mining Charter is a 
regulatory instrument that facilitates 
sustainable transformation, growth and 
development of the mining industry. The 
Group is committed to fully complying 
with the New Mining Charter and 
providing adequate resources to this area 
in order to ensure opportunities are 
expanded for historically disadvantaged 
South Africans (HDSAs) to enter the 
mining and minerals industry. In addition, 
we continue to adhere and make progress 
in terms of our Social and Labour Plan 
and our various BEE initiatives. A fuller 
explanation of these can be found in our 
Sustainable Development Report on page 
7.

These export constraints, arising from the 
problems of the rail network, contributed 
to a stable supply of coal to the South 
African domestic market in 2021. As a 
result, domestic coal prices in 2021 
remained largely unchanged by 
comparison with the 2020 prices; the 
Group achieved an average domestic 
price of R470 per tonne coal sold 
compared to R450 in 2020. Overall, 
domestic sales volumes from our South 
African operations increased during the 
year to 1.13million metric tonnes (2020: 
0.97million metric tonnes).

Overall, the Group achieved an average 
Rand price per tonne of coal sold of R616 
compared to R469 in 2020. In addition to 
the higher coal prices, higher overall sales 
volumes and a reduction in stocks 
contributed to the increase in Sterling 
Group revenue during the year. 

Looking forward into 2022, in the first 
quarter we have seen the API4 price 
average $238 and exports from our South 
African operations to date have been in 
line with the average export tonnages we 
achieved in 2021. However, looking 
beyond the first quarter, uncertainties 
remain. These are particularly with regard 
to the sustainability of the higher 
international coal price as well as the 
impact of continued constraints in 
transporting coal for export on the South 
African rail network. 

6 Bisichi PLC

 
 
 
Strategic Report
Sustainable development
The Group is fully committed to ensuring the sustainability of both our UK and 
South African operations and delivering long term value to all our stakeholders. 

Social, community and 
human rights issues
The Group believes that it is in the 
shareholders’ interests to consider social 
and human rights issues when 
conducting business activities both in the 
UK and South Africa. Various policies and 
initiatives implemented by the Group that 
fall within these areas are discussed 
within this report.

Health, Safety &  
Environment (HSE)
The Group is committed to creating a 
safe and healthy working environment for 
its employees and the health and safety 
of our employees is of the utmost 
importance. 

HSE performance in 2021:
• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 No cases of Occupational Diseases 
were recorded. 
 Zero claims for the Compensation for 
Occupational Diseases were submitted.
 No machines operating at Black Wattle 
exceeded the regulatory noise level.
 The Group’s South African operations 
recorded two Lost time Injuries during 
2021. 

In addition to the required personnel 
appointments and assignment of direct 
health and safety responsibilities on the 
mine, a system of Hazard Identification 
and Risk Assessments has been 
designed, implemented and maintained  
at Black Wattle and at Sisonke Coal 
Processing. 

Health and Safety training is conducted 
on an ongoing basis. We are pleased to 
report all relevant employees to date have 
received training in hazard identification 
and risk assessment in their work areas. 

A medical surveillance system is also in 
place which provides management with 
information used in determining measures 
to eliminate, control and minimise 
employee health risks and hazards and all 
Occupational Health hazards are 
monitored on an ongoing basis.

Various systems to enhance the current 
HSE strategy have been introduced as 
follows:
• 
• 

 In order to improve hazard identification 
before the commencing of tasks, mini 
risk assessment booklets have been 
distributed to all mine employees and 
long term contractors on the mine. 
 Dover testing is conducted for all 
operators. Dover testing is a risk 
detection and accident reduction tool 
which identifies employees’ problematic 
areas in their fundamental skills in 
order to receive appropriate training.
 A Job Safety Analysis form is utilised to 
ensure effective identification of 
hazards in the workplace.
 In order to capture and record 
investigation findings from incidents, an 
incident recording sheet is utilised by 
line management and contractors.
 Black Wattle Colliery utilises ICAM 
(Incident Cause Analysis Method).
 On-going training on first aid is being 
conducted with all employees involved 
with this discipline.

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

Covid-19 measures in 2021: 

The Group continues to monitor and 
adhere to all of the South African 
government’s Covid-19 related guidelines 
and regulations including all updates and 
advice from the National Department of 
Health, the Department of Minerals 
Resources and Energy and the Office of 
the President. These measures include:
• 
• 

 Regular communications with 
employees on all guidelines, 
government restrictions and best 
practice hygiene and health 
recommendations;
 Conducting various issue-based hazard 
identification and risk assessments;
 Temperature screening of those 
entering certain of our offices and sites;
 Working from home (in both the UK and 
South Africa), where possible or 
required;
 Social distancing measures at 
operating sites;
 Restrictions on non-essential visits  
to operating sites; and 
 Intensified cleaning and hygiene at 
offices and sites.   

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

Bisichi PLC

77

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Strategic Report Sustainable development

In particular the Group has endeavoured 
to follow the guidelines of the 10-point 
plan developed by the Department of 
Minerals Resources and Energy in line 
with the guidelines of the Department of 
Health and the National Institute of 
Communicable Diseases (NICD) as 
follows:
• 
• 

 Educate employees on the virus, 
symptoms and prevention.
 Follow guidelines from the NICD, 
educate health workers on how to 
manage Covid-19. Consider alternate 
arrangements for supply of chronic 
medication to reduce crowds.
 Ensure that all health workers have 
access to protective clothing, gloves, 
masks, cleaning materials and 
pharmaceutical agents.
 Vaccinate employees for seasonal 
influenza.
 All employees are encouraged to know 
their status, get onto ARVs if positive 
for HIV.
 Manage suspected cases or contacts 
of cases using guidelines from the 
NICD.
 Liaise with the NICD on procedure to 
be followed for suspected and 
confirmed cases.
 Only essential travel to areas with 
Covid-19 should be undertaken.
 All suspected and confirmed cases in 
the mining industry should be reported 
to the NICD.
 Monitor and stay aware of the latest 
information on the Covid-19 pandemic.

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

8 Bisichi PLC

Black Wattle Colliery Social 
and Labour Plan (SLP) and 
Community Projects
Black Wattle Colliery is committed to true 
transformation and empowerment as well 
as poverty eradication within the 
surrounding and labour providing 
communities.

Black Wattle is committed to providing 
opportunities for the sustainable socio-
economic development of its 
stakeholders, such as:
• 
• 

 Employees and their families, through 
Skills Development, Education 
Development, Human Resource 
Development, Empowerment and 
Progression Programmes.
 Surrounding and labour sending 
communities, through Local Economic 
Development, Rural and Community 
Development, Enterprise Development 
and Procurement Programmes.
 Empowering partners, through Broad-
Based Black Economic Empowerment 
(BBBEE) and Joint Ventures with 
Historically Disadvantaged South 
African (HDSA) new mining entrants 
and enterprises.
 The company engages in on going 
consultation with its stakeholders to 
develop strong company-employee 
relationships, strong company-
community relationships and strong 
company-HDSA enterprise 
relationships. 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

The key focus areas in terms of the 
detailed SLP programmes were updated 
as follows:
• 
• 

 Implementation of new action plans, 
projects, targets and budgets were 
established through regular workshops 
with all stakeholders.

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 A comprehensive desktop socio-
economic assessment was undertaken 
on baseline data of the Steve Tshwete 
Local Municipality (STLM) and 
Nkangala District Municipality (NDM).
 The STLM is still in the process of 
finalising its 2022-2027 Local 
Economic Development (LED) Plan. 
Once finalised, Black Wattle Colliery 
will select projects from the 2022-2027 
STLM LED plan for the inclusion in its 
2022-2027 SLP. The Black Wattle 
Colliery SLP will thereafter be 
submitted to the department of Mineral 
Resources and Energy for approval.
 The building of the new school hall at 
the Phumelele Secondary School in the 
Rockdale Township will be completed 
during the second quarter of 2022. 
 Various upgrades were initiated at the 
Evergreen School nearby to Black Wattle. 

Black Wattle has implemented various 
community initiatives including:
• 
• 

 A community training environmental 
project, where local community 
members are trained to safely cut and 
remove non-indigenous vegetation, the 
making, bagging and sales of charcoal.
 Certain community members have 
been identified for training in areas 
regarding mining and beneficiation.  
These areas include but are not limited 
to conveyor maintenance, operation of 
mining machinery and training in 
environmental waste management.
 An interlocking block manufacturing 
operation will be started during 2022, 
making interlocking blocks for building 
homes
 Two HDSA females completed their 
University studies in the 2021 academic 
year.
 Two local community HDSA members 
were enrolled for the new academic year.

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Strategic Report Sustainable development

Environment & Environment 
Management Programme
South Africa
Under the terms of the mine’s 
Environmental Management Programme 
approved by the Department of Mineral 
Resource and Energy (“DMRE”), Black 
Wattle undertakes a host of environmental 
protection activities to ensure that the 
approved Environmental Management Plan 
is fully implemented. In addition to these 
routine activities, Black Wattle regularly 
carries out environmental monitoring 
activities on and around the mine, including 
evaluation of ground water quality, air 
quality, noise and lighting levels, ground 
vibrations, air blast monitoring, and 
assessment of visual impacts. In addition to 
this Black Wattle also performs quarterly 
monitoring of all boreholes around the mine 
to ensure that no contaminated water filters 
through to the surrounding communities.

Black Wattle is fully compliant with the 
regulatory requirements of the 
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry 
and has an approved water use licence. 

Black Wattle Colliery has substantially 
improved its water management by 
erecting and upgrading all its pollution 
control dams in consultation with the 
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. 

A performance assessment audit was 
conducted to verify compliance to our 
Environmental Management Programme 
and no significant deviations were found.

United Kingdom
The Group’s UK activities are principally 
retail property investment as well as 
residential property development whereby 
we provide or develop premises which are 
rented to retail businesses or sold on to end 
users. We seek to provide tenants and 
users in both these areas with good quality 
premises from which they can operate or 
reside in an environmentally sound manner.

Procurement
In compliance with the Mining Charter 
and the Mineral and Petroleum Resource 
Development Act, the Group’s South 
African operations has implemented a 
BBBEE-focussed procurement policy 
which strongly encourages our suppliers 
to establish and maintain BBBEE 
credentials. At present, BBBEE 
companies provide approximately 90 
percent of Black Wattle’s equipment and 
services. 

Mining Charter
In South Africa, the new government 
regulated Broad-Based Socio-Economic 
Empowerment Charter for the Mining and 
Minerals Industry, 2020 (New Mining 
Charter) came into force from March 
2020. The New Mining Charter is a 
regulatory instrument that facilitates 
sustainable transformation, growth and 
development of the mining industry. The 
Group’s mining operation is expected to 
reach various levels of compliance to the 
New Mining Charter over a period of five 
years from March 2020. The Group is 
committed to providing adequate 
resources to this area in order to ensure 
full compliance to the New Mining Charter 
is achieved over the transitional period. 
As part of Black Wattle’s commitment to 
the New Mining Charter, the company 
seeks to: 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 Expand opportunities for historically 
disadvantaged South Africans 
(HDSAs), including women and youth, 
to enter the mining and minerals 
industry and benefit from the extraction 
and processing of the country’s 
resources;

 Utilise the existing skills base for the 
empowerment of HDSAs; and

 Expand the skills base of HDSAs in 
order to serve the community.

Employment
The Group’s South African operations are 
committed to achieving the goals of the 
South African Employment Equity Act 
and is pleased to report the following:

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 Black Wattle Colliery has exceeded the 
10 percent women in management and 
core mining target.

 Black Wattle Colliery has achieved over 
15 percent women in core mining.

 94 percent of the women at Black 
Wattle Colliery are HDSA females.

Black Wattle Colliery has successfully 
submitted their annual Employment 
Equity Report to the Department of 
Labour.

In terms of staff training some highlights 
for 2021 were: 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 12 employees were trained in ABET 
(Adult Basic Educational Training) on 
various levels; 

 An additional 9 disabled HDSA women 
continued their training on ABET levels 
one to four.

 We are pleased to confirm that 1 HDSA 
male completed his apprenticeships in 
2021.

 Further to the above we confirm that 1 
HDSA female was allocated a Bursary 
for the 2021 period whilst 2 HDSA 
males and 2 HDSA females continued 
their Bursaries.

Highlights for 2021 for Sisonke Coal 
Processing:

• 
• 

 5 employees were trained in ABET 
(Adult Basic Educational Training) on 
various levels  

Bisichi PLC

99

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Strategic Report Sustainable development

Employment terms and conditions for our 
employees based at our UK office and at 
our South African mining operations are 
regulated by and are operated in 
compliance with all relevant prevailing 
national and local legislation. Employment 
terms and conditions provided to mining 
staff meet or exceed the national 
average. The Group’s mining operations 
and coal washing plant facility are labour 
intensive and unionised. During the year 
no labour disputes, strikes or wage 
negotiations disrupted production or had 
a significant impact on earnings. The 
Group’s relations to date with labour 
representatives and labour related unions 
continue to remain strong.

In terms of directors, employees and 
gender representation, at the year end 
the Group had 9 directors (8 male, 1 
female), 6 senior managers (5 male, 1 
female) and 229 employees (160 male, 
69 female).

Anti-slavery and human 
trafficking
The Group is committed to the prevention 
of the use of forced labour and has a zero 
tolerance policy for human trafficking and 
slavery. The Group’s policies and 
initiatives in this area can be found within 
the Group’s Anti-slavery and human 
trafficking statement found on the 
Group’s website at www.bisichi.co.uk.  

Our reporting includes our energy use 
and emissions associated with our UK 
office, which are minimal (2 tonnes of 
CO2e). The IPCC methodology *Tier 1 (+2) 
Methodology (2006 with 2019 edits) - 
Low, Average, and High CH4 Emission 
Factors – Medium Scenario) was used to 
calculate emissions from surface coal 
mining activities. The Group has not 
implemented any energy efficiency 
programs or specific measures during the 
2021 year.

Green House Gas reporting
We have reported on all of the emission 
sources required under the Companies 
Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ 
Reports) Regulations.

The data detailed in these tables 
represent emissions and energy use for 
which the Group is responsible. To 
calculate our emissions, we have used the 
main requirements of the Greenhouse 
Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and a 
methodology adapted from the 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 
Change (2019), along with the UK 
Government GHG Conversion Factors for 
Company Reporting 2021. Any estimates 
included in our totals are derived from 
actual data which have been extrapolated 
to cover the full reporting periods. 

The group’s carbon footprint:

Emissions source:

Emissions from the combustion of fuel or the operation of 
any facility including fugitive emis-sions from refrigerants 
use

2021
CO2e 
Tonnes

2020 
CO2e 
Tonnes

41,960

46,162

Emissions resulting from the purchase of electricity, heat, steam 
or cooling by the company for its own use (location based) 

12,040

12,482

Total gross emissions 

Intensity:

Tonnes of CO2 per £ sterling of revenue  

Tonnes of CO2 per tonne of coal produced

54,000

58,644

0.0011

0.0020

0.0516

0.0497

kWh

kWh

Energy consumption used to calculate above emissions

83,079,614 99,450,585

Of which UK

10,186

5,571

10 Bisichi PLC

Strategic Report
Principal risks & uncertainties

PRINCIPAL RISK

PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE RISK

COAL PRICE AND VOLUME RISK COVID-19 RISK

The Group is exposed to coal price risk as its future revenues 
will be derived based on contracts or agreements with physical 
off-take partners at prices that will be determined by reference 
to market prices of coal at delivery date.

The Group’s South African mining and coal processing 
operational earnings are significantly dependent on 
movements in both the export and domestic coal price. 

The price of export sales is derived from a US Dollar-
denominated export coal price and therefore the price 
achievable in South African Rands can be influenced by 
movements in exchange rates and overall global demand and 
supply. The volume of export sales achievable can be 
influenced by rail capacity and export quota constraints at 
Richards Bay Coal Terminal under the Quattro programme.

The domestic market coal prices are denominated in South 
African Rand and are primarily dependant on local demand 
and supply.

In the short term, the Covid-19 pandemic and geo-political 
events in Ukraine may result in additional price volatility in both 
the export and domestic market due to fluctuations in both 
demand and supply.

Longer term both the demand and supply of coal in the 
domestic and global market may be negatively impacted by 
regulatory changes related to climate change and 
governmental CO2 emission commitments.  

The Group primarily focuses on managing its underlying 
production and processing costs to mitigate coal price volatility 
as well as from time to time entering into forward sales contracts 
with the goal of preserving future revenue streams. The Group 
has not entered into any such contracts in 2020 and 2021. 

The Group’s export and domestic sales are determined based on 
the ability to deliver the quality of coal required by each market 
together with the market factors set out opposite. Volumes of 
export sales achieved during the year were primarily dependent 
on the Group’s ability to produce the higher quality of coal 
required for export, obtaining adequate rail capacity and utilising 
allowable export quotas under the Quattro programme. The 
volume of domestic market sales achieved during the year were 
primarily dependant on local demand and supply as well as the 
Group’s ability to produce the overall quality of coal required. The 
Group continues to assess on an ongoing basis its dependence 
on the above factors and evaluate alternative means to ensure 
coal sales and prices achieved are optimised.

The Group assesses on an ongoing basis the impact that 
Covid-19, geo-political events in Ukraine, regulatory changes 
related to climate change and governmental CO2 emission 
commitments may have on the Group’s mining operations and 
future investment decisions.

Bisichi PLC

1111

Strategic Report Principal risks & uncertainties

PRINCIPAL RISK

 MINING RISK  

As with many mining operations, the reserve that is mined has 
the risk of not having the qualities and accessibility expected 
from geological and environmental analysis. This can have a 
negative impact on revenue and earnings as the quality and 
quantity of coal mined and sold by our mining operations may 
be lower than expected.

 CURRENCY RISK  

The Group’s operations are sensitive to currency movements, 
especially those between the South African Rand, US Dollar 
and British Pound. These movements can have a negative 
impact on the Group’s mining operations revenue as noted 
above, as well as operational earnings. 

The Group is exposed to currency risk in regard to the Sterling 
value of inter-company trading balances with its South African 
operations. It arises as a result of the retranslation of Rand 
denominated inter-company trade receivable balances into 
Sterling that are held within the UK and which are payable by 
South African Rand functional currency subsidiaries. 

The Group is exposed to currency risk in regard to the 
retranslation of the Group’s South African functional currency 
net assets to the Sterling reporting functional currency of the 
Group. A weakening of the South African Rand against Sterling 
can have a negative impact on the financial position and net 
asset values reported by the Group. 

PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE RISK

This risk is managed by engaging independent geological 
experts, referred to in the industry as the “Competent Person”, to 
determine the estimated reserves and their technical and 
commercial feasibility for extraction. In addition, management 
engage Competent Persons to assist management in the 
production of detailed life of mine plans as well as in the 
monitoring of actual mining results versus expected performance 
and management’s response to variances. The Group continued 
to engage an independent Competent Person in the current year. 
Refer to page 5 for details of mining performance.

Export sales within the Group’s South African operations are 
derived from a US Dollar-denominated export coal price. A 
weakening of the US Dollar can have a negative impact on the 
South African Rand prices achievable for coal sold by the 
Group’s South African mining operations. This in turn can have a 
negative impact on the Group’s mining operations revenue as 
well as operational earnings as the Group’s mining operating 
costs are Rand denominated. In order to mitigate this, the Group 
may enter into forward sales contracts in local currencies with 
the goal of preserving future revenue streams. The Group has 
not entered into any such contracts in 2021 and 2020. 

Although it is not the Group’s policy to obtain forward contracts 
to mitigate foreign exchange risk on inter-company trading 
balances or on the retranslation of the Group’s South African 
functional currency net assets, management regularly review the 
requirement to do so in light of any increased risk of future 
volatility.

Refer to the ‘Financial Review’ for details of significant currency 
movement impacts in the year.

12 Bisichi PLC

Strategic Report Principal risks & uncertainties

PRINCIPAL RISK

PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE RISK

 NEW RESERVES AND MINING PERMISSIONS

The life of the mine, acquisition of additional reserves, 
permissions to mine (including ongoing and once-off 
permissions) and new mining opportunities in South Africa 
generally are contingent on a number of factors outside of the 
Group’s control such as approval by the Department of Mineral 
Resources and Energy, the Department of Water Affairs and 
Forestry and other regulatory or state owned entities. 

In addition, the Group’s South African operations are subject to 
the government Mining Charter with the New Mining Charter 
coming into force from March 2020. Failure to meet existing 
targets or further regulatory changes to the Mining Charter, 
could adversely affect the mine’s ability to retain its mining 
rights in South Africa.

The work performed in the acquisition and renewal of mining 
permits as well as the maintenance of compliance with permits 
includes factors such as environmental management, health and 
safety, labour laws and Black Empowerment legislation (such as 
the New Mining Charter); as failure to maintain appropriate 
controls and compliance may in turn result in the withdrawal of 
the necessary permissions to mine. The management of these 
regulatory risks and performance in the year is noted in the 
Mining Review on page 5 as well as in the Sustainable 
Development report on page 7 and in this section under the 
headings environmental risk, health & safety risk and labour risk. 
Additionally, in order to mitigate this risk, the Group strives to 
provide adequate resources to this area including the 
employment of adequate personnel and the utilisation of third 
party consultants competent in regulatory compliance related to 
mining rights and mining permissions. 

The Group also continues to actively seek new opportunities to 
expand its mining operations in South Africa through the 
acquisition of additional coal reserves and new commercial 
arrangements with existing mining right holders.

    POWER SUPPLY RISK

The current utility provider for power supply in South Africa 
is the government run Eskom. Eskom continues to undergo 
capacity problems resulting in power cuts and lack of provision 
of power supply to new projects. Any power cuts or lack of 
provision of power supply to the Group’s mining operations may 
disrupt mining production and impact on earnings.

The Group’s mining operations have to date not been affected by 
power cuts. However the Group manages this risk through 
regular monitoring of Eskom’s performance and ongoing ability to 
meet power requirements. In addition, the Group continues to 
assess the ability to utilise diesel generators as an alternative 
means of securing power in the event of power outages. 

FLOODING RISK  
The Group’s mining operations are susceptible to seasonal 
flooding which could disrupt mining production and impact on 
earnings.

Management monitors water levels on an ongoing basis and 
various projects have been completed, including the 
construction of additional dams, to minimise the impact of this 
risk as far as possible. 

Bisichi PLC

1313

Strategic Report Principal risks & uncertainties

PRINCIPAL RISK

PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE RISK

    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK

The Group’s South African mining operations are required to 
adhere to local environmental regulations. Any failure to adhere 
to local environmental regulations, could adversely affect the 
mine’s ability to mine under its mining right in South Africa.

    HEALTH & SAFETY RISK

Attached to mining there are inherent health and safety risks. 
Any such safety incidents disrupt operations, and can slow or 
even stop production. In addition, the Group’s South African 
mining operations are required to adhere to local Health and 
Safety regulations as well as enhanced health and Safety 
measures related to Covid-19.

    LABOUR RISK

The Group’s mining operations and coal washing plant facility 
are labour intensive and unionised. Any labour disputes, 
strikes or wage negotiations may disrupt production and 
impact earnings.

In line with all South African mining companies, the management 
of this risk is based on compliance with the Environment 
Management Plan. In order to ensure compliance, the Group 
strives to provide adequate resources to this area including the 
employment of personnel and the utilisation of third party 
consultants competent in regulatory compliance related to 
environmental management. 

To date, Black Wattle is fully compliant with the regulatory 
requirements of the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry 
and has an approved water use licence. Further details of the 
Group’s Environment Management Programme are disclosed in 
the Sustainable development report on page 7.

The Group has a comprehensive Health and Safety programme 
in place to mitigate this risk. Management strive to create an 
environment where Health and safety of our employees is of the 
utmost importance. Our Health & Safety programme provides 
clear guidance on the standards our mining operation is 
expected to achieve. In addition, management receive regular 
updates on how our mining operations are performing. Further 
details of the Group’s Health and Safety Programme are 
disclosed in the Sustainable Development report on page 7.

In order to mitigate this risk, the Group strives to ensure open 
and transparent dialogue with employees across all levels. In 
addition, appropriate channels of communication are provided to 
all employment unions at Black Wattle to ensure effective and 
early engagement on employment matters, in particular wage 
negotiations and disputes. 

Refer to the ‘Employment’ section on page 9 for further details.

14 Bisichi PLC

Strategic Report Principal risks & uncertainties

PRINCIPAL RISK

 CASHFLOW RISK

Commodity price risk, currency volatility and the uncertainties 
inherent in mining may result in favourable or unfavourable 
cashflows.

PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE RISK

In order to mitigate this, we seek to balance the high risk of our 
mining operations with a dependable cash flow from our UK 
property investment operations which are actively managed by 
London & Associated Properties PLC and our equity investment 
portfolio. Due to the long term nature of the leases, the effect on 
cash flows from property investment activities are expected to 
remain stable as long as tenants remain in operation. Refer to 
Financial and Performance review on page 20 for details of the 
property and investment portfolio performance. 

    PROPERTY VALUATION RISK

Fluctuations in property values, which are reflected in the 
Consolidated Income Statement and Balance Sheet, are 
dependent on an annual valuation of the Group’s commercial 
and residential development properties. A fall in UK commercial 
and residential property can have a marked effect on the 
profitability and the net asset value of the Group as well as 
impact on covenants and other loan agreement obligations.

The Group utilises the services of London & Associated Properties 
PLC whose responsibility is to actively manage the portfolio to 
improve rental income and thus enhance the value of the portfolio 
over time. In addition, management regularly monitor banking 
covenants and other loan agreement obligations as well as the 
performance of our property assets in relation to the overall 
market over time. 

The economic performance of the United Kingdom, including 
the potential final impact of the United Kingdom leaving the 
European Union (“Brexit”), the final impact of Covid-19 
pandemic, an impact from geo-political events in Ukraine as 
well as the current overall economic performance and trends of 
the UK retail market, may impact the level of rental income, 
yields and associated property valuations of the Group’s UK 
property assets including its investments in Joint Ventures.

Management continues to monitor and evaluate the impact of 
Brexit, the Covid-19 pandemic, geo-political events in Ukraine and 
the current economic performance of the UK retail market on the 
future performance of the Group’s existing UK portfolio. In 
addition, the Group assesses on an ongoing basis the 
performance of the UK retail market on the Group’s banking 
covenants, loan obligations and future investment decisions.   

Refer to page 20 for details of the property portfolio performance.

    COVID-19 RISK

The Group is continually assessing and managing any potential 
further risks brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic. Overall, 
the Group is primarily exposed to impacts on the health and 
safety of its employees and stakeholders. In the UK, 
uncertainties remain on the final impact on retail property 
revenue and values from the Covid-19 pandemic as outlined 
under property valuation risk above. In South Africa, the Group 
may be impacted by additional health and safety measures 
related to its workforce and coal price risk as outlined under 
the same heading above.

Risks faced by the business are assessed by the Board on an 
ongoing basis. 

Strategies for mitigating the risks have been defined and specific 
measures for achieving these have already been implemented. 
These include the measures outlined in the Sustainability 
development section of this report.

The final impact of the Covid-19 pandemic remains uncertain and 
the Group will adapt plans accordingly as any new information 
becomes available or government advice changes.

Bisichi PLC

1515

Strategic Report
Financial & performance review 
The movement in the Group’s Adjusted EBITDA from a loss of £1.1million in 2020 to 
a profit of £5.0million in 2021 can mainly be attributed to higher prices achievable for 
our coal and higher coal sale volumes from the Group’s South African operations in 
the second half of the year. This offset the higher operating costs achieved in 2021.  

EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and mining 
production are used as key performance 
indicators for the Group and its mining 
activities as the Group has a strategic focus 
on the long term development of its existing 
mining reserves and the acquisition of 
additional mining reserves in order to realise 
shareholder value. Mining production can 
be defined as the coal quantity in metric 
tonnes extracted from our reserves during 
the period and held by the mine before any 
processing through the washing plant. 
Whilst profit/(loss) before tax is considered 

as one of the key overall performance 
indicators of the Group, the profitability of 
the Group and the Group’s mining activities 
can be impacted by the volatile and capital 
intensive nature of the mining sector. 
Accordingly, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA 
are primarily used as key performance 
indicators as they are indicative of the value 
associated with the Group’s mining assets 
expected to be realised over the long term 
life of the Group’s mining reserves. In 
addition, for the Group’s property 
investment operations, the net property 

valuation and net property revenue are 
utilised as key performance indicators as 
the Group’s substantial property portfolio 
reduces the risk profile for shareholders by 
providing stable cash generative UK assets 
and access to capital appreciation. Certain 
key performance indicators below are not 
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice 
measures and are not intended as a 
substitute for those measures, and may or 
may not be the same as those used by 
other companies.

Key performance indicators 

The key performance indicators for the group are: 

For the group:

Operating profit /(loss) before depreciation, fair value adjustments and exchange movements (adjusted EBITDA)

EBITDA

Profit/(Loss) before tax

For our property investment operations:

Net property valuation 

Net property revenue 

For our mining activities:

Operating profit/(loss) before depreciation, fair value adjustments and exchange movements (adjusted EBITDA)

EBITDA

Mining production

Quantity of coal sold

16 Bisichi PLC

2021 
£’000 

2020 
£’000 

5,028

5,849

2,501

(1,111)

(2,387)

(5,196)

10,525

10,270

1,119

1,181

4,266

4,145

Tonnes
’000

1,046

1,447

(1,821)

(1,782)

Tonnes
’000

1,180

1,199

Strategic Report Financial & performance review 

The key performance indicators of the group  
can be reconciled as follows:
Revenue

Transport and loading cost

Mining and washing costs

Other operating costs excluding depreciation

Operating profit before depreciation, fair value adjustments and 
exchange movements (adjusted EBITDA)

Exchange movements

Fair value adjustments

Gains on investments held at fair value through profit and loss (FVPL)

Operating profit excluding depreciation

Share of loss in joint venture

EBITDA

Net interest movement

Depreciation

Profit before tax

The key performance indicators of the Group 
can be reconciled as follows:
Revenue 

Transport and loading cost 

Mining and washing costs

Other operating costs excluding depreciation

Operating (loss)/profit before depreciation, fair value adjustments 
and exchange movements (adjusted EBITDA)

Exchange movements

Fair value adjustments

Gains on investments held at fair value through profit and loss (FVPL)

Operating (loss)/profit excluding depreciation

Share of loss in joint venture

EBITDA

Net interest movement

Depreciation

Loss before tax

Mining
£’000
49,226

(5,569)

(32,438)

(6,953)

4,266

(121)

-

-

4,145

-

4,145

Mining
£’000
28,567

(1,906)

(22,739)

(5,743)

(1,821)

39

-

-

(1,782)

-

(1,782)

Property
£’000
1,119

-

-

(527)

592

-

255

-

847

(125)

722

Other
£’000
175

-

-

(5)

170

-

-

812

982

-

982

Property
£’000
1,181

Other
£’000
57

-

-

(523)

658

-

(1,295)

-

(637)

(87)

(724)

-

-

(5)

52

-

-

67

119

-

119

2021
£’000
50,520

(5,569)

(32,438)

(7,485)

5,028

(121)

255

812

5,974

(125)

5,849

(777)

(2,571)

2,501

2020
£’000
29,805

(1,906)

(22,739)

(6,271)

(1,111)

39

(1,295)

67

(2,300)

(87)

(2,387)

(616)

(2,193)

(5,196)

Bisichi PLC

1717

Strategic Report Financial & performance review 

Adjusted EBITDA is used as a key indicator 
of the operating trading performance of 
the Group and its operating segments 
representing operating profit before the 
impact of depreciation, fair value 
adjustments, gains/(losses) on disposal of 
other investments and foreign exchange 
movements. The Group’s operating 
segments include its South African mining 
operations and UK property. The 
performance of these two operating 
segments are discussed in more detail 
below. 

The Group achieved an EBITDA for the 
year of £5.8million (2020: loss 
£2.4million). The movement compared to 
the prior year can mainly be attributed to 
the operating profit before depreciation 
from our mining activities of £4.3million 
(2020: loss £1.8million). 

The Group’s fair value gains, related to 
our UK property were £0.3million (2020: 
loss £1.3million) and those related to 
investments held at fair value through 
profit and loss were £0.8million (2020: 
£0.1million). Overall, the Group reported 

an overall profit before tax of £2.5million 
(2020: loss £5.2 million). Taxation for the 
year increased to £0.8million (2020: gain 
of £1.4million). This resulted in the Group 
achieving an overall profit for the year 
after tax of £1.7million (2020: loss 
£3.8million), of which £1.5million (2020: 
loss £3.4million) was attributable to 
equity holders of the company. 

South African mining operations 
Performance
The key performance indicators of the group’s South African mining  
operations are presented in South African Rand and UK Sterling as follows:

Revenue 

Transport and loading costs

Mining and washing costs

South African Rand
2020
2021
R’000 
R’000

1,004,444

602,581

2021
£’000

49,223

(113,641)

(40,204)

(5,569)

UK Sterling 

2020 
£’000

28,567

(1,906)

(661,929)

(479,647)

(32,438)

(22,739)

Operating profit before other operating costs and depreciation

228,874

82,730

Other operating costs (excluding depreciation)

Operating profit before depreciation, fair value adjustments and 
exchange movements (adjusted EBITDA)

Exchange movements

EBITDA

Mining production in tonnes

Net Revenue per tonne of mining production

Mining and washing costs per tonne of mining production

Operating profit per tonne of mining production before other operating costs and depreciation 

11,216

(6,950)

4,266

(121)

4,145

2021
’000

1,046

2021
R

852

(633)

219

3,922

(5,743)

(1,821)

39

(1,782)

2020
’000

1,180

2020
R

477

(406)

71

Net Revenue per tonne of mining production can be defined as the revenue price achieved per metric tonne of mining production 
less transportation and loading costs.

18 Bisichi PLC

Strategic Report Financial & performance review 

A breakdown of the quantity of coal sold and revenue of the Group’s South African mining operations are presented in metric 
tonnes and South African Rand as follows:

Quantity of coal sold in tonnes

Revenue

Net Revenue per tonne of coal sold

Domestic
’000

1,127

Domestic
R’000

530,905

R

470

Mining and washing costs per tonne of coal sold

Operating profit per tonne of coal sold before  
other operating costs and depreciation 

Export
’000

320

Export
R’000

2021
’000

1,447

2021
R’000

473,539

1004,444

R

1,129

R

616

(457)

158

Domestic
’000

969

Domestic
R’000

442,516

R

450

Export
’000

230

Export
R’000

2020
’000

1,199

2020
R’000

160,065

602,581

R

547

R 

469

(400)

69

The quantity of coal sold can be defined 
as the quantity of coal sold in metric 
tonnes by the Group in any given period. 
Net Revenue per tonne of coal sold can 
be defined as the revenue price achieved 
less transportation and loading costs per 
metric tonne of coal sold. 

Total net revenue per tonne of coal sold 
for the Group’s mining and processing 
operations increased for the year from 
R469 per tonne of coal sold in 2020 to 
R616 in 2021, mainly attributable to the 
average price increase achieved in the 
export market. A decrease in mining 
production during the year, attributable to 
difficult mining conditions, was offset by 
an increase in buy-in coal processed and 
a decrease in coal inventories due to 
improved coal demand resulting in the 
quantity of coal sold for the year 
increasing to 1.447million tonnes (2020: 
1.199million tonnes). Overall, the increase 
in revenue per tonne of coal sold and the 
higher coal sales volumes, particularly in 
the export market, resulted in revenue 
from the Group’s South African mining 
operations increasing during the year to 
R1.005billion compared to revenue of 
R0.603billion in the prior year.

Mining and washing costs per tonne of 
coal sold during the year increased from 
R400 per tonne in 2020 to R457 per 
tonne in 2020 due to incremental 
increases in both mining and washing 
costs. This resulted in an increase in total 
mining and washing costs for the Group 
to R661.9million (2020: R479.6million). 

Other operating costs (excluding 
depreciation) of £6.95million (2020: 
£5.74million) include general administrative 
costs as well as administrative salaries and 
wages related to our South African mining 
operations that are incurred both in South 
Africa and in the UK. These costs are not 
significantly impacted by movements in 
mining production and coal processing. 
The increase during the year can mainly be 
attributed to lower administrative salaries 
and wages costs incurred in 2020 due to 
the financial performance of the Group in 
the same period. Overall costs in South 
Africa were in line with management’s 
expectations and local inflation. 

Overall, the movement in the Group’s 
Adjusted EBITDA from a loss of £1.1million 
in 2020 to a profit of £5.0million in 2021 
can mainly be attributed to higher prices 
achievable for our coal and increased coal 
sales from the Group’s South African coal 
processing operations. This offset the 
higher mining, washing and operating 
costs incurred in 2021. A further 
explanation of the mines operational 
performance can be found in the Mining 
Review on page 5. 

Non-controlling interest Black Wattle
As mentioned in the Chairman’s statement 
and Mining Review, the Group’s subsidiary 
Black Wattle Colliery (Pty) Ltd signed an 
agreement to acquire additional coal 
reserves during the year. The new reserves 
of 6.1million metric tonnes, will extend the 
life of mine of Black Wattle to eight years 
and remains subject to regulatory approval. 
The acquisition was negotiated in 
conjunction with a re-negotiation of 
2.1million metric tonnes of separate coal 
reserves previously acquired from the 
same seller, as previously announced in 
our 2018 annual report. 

Bisichi PLC

1919

Strategic Report Financial & performance review 

Vunani Mining (Pty) Ltd our black 
economic empowered shareholders at 
Black Wattle, were integral in the success 
in acquiring both of these reserves. As a 
result, it was agreed that Vunani Mining 
will share equally in any distributable 
economic benefit from the coal reserves 
as part of their non-controlling interest in 
Black Wattle. This has been achieved 
through a new shares issue in Black 
Wattle that was completed subsequent to 
year end on 12 April 2022. The total 
issued share capital in Black Wattle 
Colliery (Pty) Ltd was increased further 
from 1000 shares to 1002 shares at par of 
R1 through the following share issue:
••    a subscription of 1 “B” Share at par by 
Bisichi Mining (Exploration Limited), a 
100% subsidiary of the Group;

••    a subscription of 1 “B” Share at par by 

Vunani Mining (Pty) Ltd

The “B” shares rank pari passu with the 
ordinary shares save that they have sole 
rights to the distributable profits 
attributable to the above mining reserves 
held by Black Wattle Colliery (Pty) Ltd. A 
non-controlling interest is therefore 
recognised for all profits distributable to 
the “B” shares held by Vunani Mining (Pty) 
Ltd from the date of issue of the shares 
(12 April 2022). 

Details of Vunani’s non-controlling interest 
held at year end can be found in the 
Non-controlling interest note on page 88. 

UK property investment
Performance
The Group’s portfolio is managed actively 
by London & Associated Properties plc. 
Rental performance was marginally below 
levels achieved in 2021. Net property 
revenue (excluding joint ventures and 
service charge income) across the 

portfolio decreased during the year to 
£1.119million (2020: £1.181million). The 
property portfolio was externally valued  
at 31 December 2021 and the value of UK 
investment properties attributable to the 
Group at year end increased to 
£10.525million (2020: £10.270million) 
mainly due to the reduced impact of 
Covid-19.  

Joint venture property investments
The Group holds a £0.6million (2020: 
£0.7million) joint venture investment in 
Dragon Retail Properties Limited, a UK 
property investment company. The open 
market value of the company’s share of 
investment properties included within its 
joint venture investment in Dragon Retail 
Properties decreased marginally during 
the year to £1.040million (2020: 
£1.065million). 

The following table summarises the main components of the consolidated cashflow for the year:

Cash flow generated from operations before working capital and other items

Cash flow from operating activities

Cash flow from investing activities

Cash flow from financing activities

Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January

Exchange adjustment

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December comprise:

  Cash and cash equivalents as presented in the balance sheet

  Bank overdrafts (secured)

20 Bisichi PLC

Year ended
31 December
2021
£’000

Year ended
31 December
2020
£’000

5,028

4,432

(2,706)

(271)

1,455

(1,078)

105

482

3,018

(2,536)

482

(1,111)

449

(4,292)

(285)

(4,128)

2,878

172

(1,078)

3,768

(4,846)

(1,078)

Strategic Report Financial & performance review 

The Group continues to hold a £0.5million 
(2020: £0.6million) 50% joint venture 
investment in West Ealing Projects 
Limited, a UK unlisted property 
development company. West Ealing 
Projects Limited’s only asset is a property 
development in West Ealing, London. The 
carrying value of the Group’s share of the 
trading property inventory included within 
this development is valued at £3.7million 
(2020: £3.5million). The joint venture has 
obtained planning consent for a 
residential development of 56 flats. We 
look forward to updating shareholders 
further in due course.

During the year the Group acquired a one 
third joint venture investment holding in 
Development Physics Limited, a UK 
unlisted property development company. 
The remaining two thirds is held equally by 
London & Associated Properties PLC and 
Metroprop Real Estate Ltd. The company 
was set up with the purpose of delivering a 
residential development of 44 flats and 4 
town houses in Purley, London. 
Development Physics acquired a series of 
options on the site and has registered for 
planning permission for its development. At 
year end, the negative carrying value of the 
investment held by the Group was £3,000 
(2020: £Nil). We look forward to updating 
shareholders further in due course.

Overall, the Group achieved net property 
revenue of £1.2million (2020: £1.3million) 
for the year which includes the company’s 
share of net property revenue from its 
investment in joint ventures of £88,000 
(2020: £71,000). 

Other Investments
During the year the Group’s non-current 
investments held at fair value through 
profit and loss increased from £1.7million 
in 2020 to £3.6million due to net 
additions during the year of £1.2million 

(2020: £1.3million) and gains from 
investments of £0.7million (2020: 
£0.2million). The investments comprise of 
£1.56million (2020: £0.96million) 
investments listed on stock exchanges in 
the United Kingdom and £2.07million 
(2020: £0.79million) of investments listed 
on overseas stock exchanges. 

Cashflow & financial position 
Cash flow generated from operating 
activities increased compared to the prior 
year to £4.4million (2020: £0.4million). 
This can mainly be attributed to the 
operating profit during the year of 
£3.4million (2020: loss £4.5million) and a 
positive cash movement attributable to a 
decrease in stocks of £2.1million (2020: 
cash decrease of £1.1million). This offset 
an increase in trade receivables of 
£1.9million (2020: decrease £0.1million). 
All of the above can mainly be attributed 
to the improved coal sales and revenue 
per tonne achieved during the year.

Investing cashflows primarily reflect the 
net effect of capital expenditure during 
the year of £1.8million (2020: £3.2million) 
which can mainly be attributable to mine 
development costs at Black Wattle of 
£1.6million (2020: £2.5million). As at year 
end the Group’s mining reserves, plant 
and equipment had a carrying value of 
£9.0million (2020: £10.1 million) with 
capital expenditure being offset by 
depreciation of £2.5million (2020: 
£2.2milion) and exchange translation 
movements of £0.4million (2020: 
£0.6million) for the year. Other investing 
cashflows also include the net acquisition 
of listed investments of £0.9million 
(2020: £1.1million).

Cash outflows from financing activities 
includes a net decrease in borrowings of 
£0.3million (2020:£0.2million). In 
addition, no dividends were paid to 

shareholders during the year (2020: 
£0.1million). 

Overall, the Group’s cash and cash 
equivalents increased during the year by 
£1.5million (2020: decrease £4.1million). 
After taking into account an exchange 
gain of £0.1million (2020: £0.2million) on 
the translation of the Group’s year end 
net balance of cash and cash equivalents 
that were held in South African Rands, 
the Group’s net balance of cash and cash 
equivalents (including bank overdrafts) at 
year end was £0.5million (2020: negative 
amount of £1.1million).

The Group has considerable financial 
resources available at short notice 
including cash and cash equivalents 
(excluding bank overdrafts) of £3.0million 
(2020: £3.8 million) and listed 
investments of £4.3million (2020: 
£2.6million) as at year end. The above 
financial resources totalling £7.3million 
(2020: £6.4million).

The net assets of the Group reported as 
at year end were £17.8million (2020: 
£16.2million) and total assets at 
£38.1million (2020: £38.7million).

Liabilities decreased from £22.5million to 
£20.3million during the year primarily due 
to a decrease in current borrowings from 
£5.1million to £2.7million. The overall 
exchange loss recorded through the 
translation reserve on translation of the 
Group’s South African net assets at year 
end decreased to £0.05million (2020: 
£0.40million) as a result of the lower 
weakening of the South African Rand 
against UK sterling year to year. 

Further details on the Group’s cashflow 
and financial position are stated in the 
Consolidated Cashflow Statement on 
page 59 and the Consolidated Balance 
Sheet on page 56 and 57. 

Bisichi PLC

2121

Strategic Report Financial & performance review 

Loans
South Africa
The Group has a structured trade finance 
facility with Absa Bank Limited for 
R85million held by Sisonke Coal 
Processing (Pty) Limited, a 100% 
subsidiary of Black Wattle Colliery (Pty) 
Limited. This facility comprises of an 
R85million revolving facility to cover the 
working capital requirements of the 
Group’s South African operations. The 
facility is renewable annually at 25 
January and is secured against inventory, 
debtors and cash that are held in the 
Group’s South African operations. 

United Kingdom
The Group holds a 5 year term facility of 
£3.9m with Julian Hodge Bank Limited at 
an initial LTV of 40%. The loan is secured 
against the company’s UK retail property 
portfolio. The amount repayable on the 
loan at year end was £3.8million. The 
debt package has a five year term and is 
repayable at the end of the term in 
December 2024. In the last quarter of 
2021 the base interest rate on the loan 
changed from LIBOR to the Bank of 
England base rate. The overall interest 
cost of the loan is 4.00% above the Bank 
of England base rate. The loan is secured 
by way of a first charge over the 
investment properties in the UK which are 
included in the financial statements at a 
value of £10.5million. No banking 
covenants were breached by the Group 
during the year. 

22 Bisichi PLC
22

Statement regarding Section 
172 of the UK Companies Act  
Section 172 of the UK Companies Act 
requires the Board to report on how the 
directors have had regard to the matters 
outlined below in performing their duties. 
The Board consider the Group’s 
customers, employees, local 
communities, suppliers and shareholders 
as key stakeholders of the Group. During 
the year, the Directors consider that they 
have acted in a way, and have made 
decision that would, most likely promote 
the success of the Group for the benefit 
of its members as a whole as outlined in 
the matters below: 
• 
• 

  The likely consequences of any 
decision in the long term: see Principal 
activity, strategy & business model on 
page 4 and Principal Risks and 
Uncertainties on page 11;
  The interests of the Group’s employees; 
ethics and compliance; fostering of the 
Company’s business relationships with 
suppliers, customers and others; and 
the impact of the Group’s operations on 
the community and environment: see 
Sustainability report on page 7;
  The need to act fairly between members 
of the Company: see the Corporate 
Governance section on page 26.

• 
• 

• 
• 

The Group continues to seek opportunities 
to expand its operations in South Africa 
through the acquisition of additional coal 
reserves. In the UK, management is 
looking forward to progressing its property 
development opportunities in West Ealing 
and Development Physics as well as 
expanding on its equity investment 
portfolio. This is in line with the Group’s 
overall strategy of balancing the high risk 
of our mining operations with a dependable 
cash flow and capital appreciation from 
our UK property investment operations 
and equity investments. 

To date, the Group’s financial position has 
remained strong and at present, the 
Group has adequate financial resources 
to ensure the Group remains viable for 
the foreseeable future and that liabilities 
are met. A full going concern and viability 
assessment can be found in the Directors 
report on page 30.  

Further information on the outlook of the 
company can be found in both the 
Chairman’s Statement on page 2 and the 
Mining Review on page 5 which form part 
of the Strategic Report.

Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors

Future prospects
As mentioned in the Chairman’s statement, 
In the first quarter of the year, we have 
seen the API4 price average $238 and 
exports from our South African operations 
in the first quarter of 2022 have been in 
line with the average export tonnages we 
achieved in 2021. However, looking 
beyond the first quarter, uncertainties 
remain, particularly in regard to the 
sustainability of the higher international 
coal price and the impact of continued 
constraints in transporting coal for export 
on the South African rail network. 

Garrett Casey 
Finance Director

13 April 2022

 
 
 
Governance

MANAGEMENT TEAM

OTHER DIRECTORS AND ADVISORS

*  SIR MICHAEL HELLER 
  MA, FCA (Chairman)

  ANDREW R HELLER  
  MA, ACA  

(Managing Director)

  GARRETT CASEY  
  CA (SA) 

(Finance Director)

  ROBERT GROBLER 
  Pr Cert Eng 

(Director of mining)

O+  CHRISTOPHER A JOLL  

MA (Non-executive) 
Christopher Joll was appointed a 
Director on 1 February 2001. He has 
held a number of non-executive 
directorships of quoted and un-quoted 
companies and currently runs his own 
event management business. He is also 
a published author, lecturer and a writer 
and director of documentary films.

O *  JOHN A SIBBALD  
BL (Non-executive) 
John Sibbald has been a Director 
since 1988. After qualifying as a 
Chartered Accountant he spent 
over 20 years in stockbroking, 
specialising in mining and 
international investment.

  JOHN WONG  
  ACA, CFA  (Non-executive)  

(Appointed 15 October 2020)  
 John Wong was appointed a 
Director on 15 October 2020. After 
training as a Chartered accountant 
he has worked in the fund 
management industry for almost 20 
years and has extensive experience 
in investment management, in 
particular within the mining sector.

SECRETARY AND 
REGISTERED OFFICE
Garrett Casey CA (SA) 
12 Little Portland Street 
London W1W8BJ

BLACK WATTLE COLLIERY 
AND SISONKE COAL 
PROCESSING DIRECTORS 
Andrew Heller  
(Managing Director)
Ethan Dube 
Robert Grobler 
Garrett Casey  
Millicent Zvarayi 

COMPANY REGISTRATION
Company registration No. 
112155 (Incorporated in 
England and Wales)

WEBSITE
www.bisichi.co.uk

E-MAIL
admin@bisichi.co.uk

AUDITOR
Kreston Reeves LLP,  
London

PRINCIPAL BANKERS 
United Kingdom 
Julian Hodge Bank Limited
Santander UK PLC
Investec PLC 

South Africa 
ABSA Bank (SA) 
First National Bank (SA)

CORPORATE SOLICITORS
United Kingdom 
Ashfords LLP, London
Fladgate LLP, London 
Olswang LLP, London
Wake Smith Solicitors 
Limited, Sheffield

South Africa 
Beech Veltman Inc, 
Johannesburg
Brandmullers Attorneys, 
Middelburg
Cliffe Decker Hofmeyer, 
Johannesburg 
Herbert Smith Freehills, 
Johannesburg
Natalie Napier Inc, 
Johannesburg
Tugendhaft Wapnick 
Banchetti and Partners, 
Johannesburg

STOCKBROKERS
Shore Capital Stockbrokers 
Limited

REGISTRARS AND 
TRANSFER OFFICE
Link Group 
Shareholder Services 
The Registry 
10th Floor 
Central Square 
29 Wellington Street 
Leeds 
LS1 4DL

*  Member of the nomination committee

+  Senior independent director

O   Member of the audit, nomination 
and remuneration committees.

UK telephone:  
0371 664 0300

Calls are charged at the standard 
geographic rate and will vary by 
provider. Calls outside the United 
Kingdom will be charged at the 
applicable international rate. The 
helpline is open between 9.00 a.m. 
– 5.30 p.m., Monday to Friday 
excluding public holidays in 
England and Wales.  

Website: https://www.linkgroup.com/

Email: shareholderenquiries@
linkgroup.co.uk

Company registration number: 
341829 (England and Wales)

Bisichi PLC

2323

 
 
 
 
 
Governance
Five year summary

Consolidated income statement items

Revenue

Operating profit /(loss)

Profit/(Loss) before tax 

Trading profit /(loss) before tax

Revaluation and impairment profit /(loss) before tax 

EBITDA

Operating profit before depreciation, fair value 
adjustments and exchange movements (adjusted EBITDA)

Consolidated balance sheet items

Investment properties

Other non-current investments

Current Investments held at fair value

Other assets less liabilities less non-controlling interests

Total equity attributable to equity shareholders

Net assets per ordinary share (attributable)

Dividend per share

Financial calendar

2021
£’000

2020
£’000

2019
£’000

2018
£’000

2017
£’000

50,520

29,805

48,106

49,945

40,350

3,403

2,501

1,559

942

5,849

5,028

10,525

4,761

15,286

685

15,971

1,541

17,512

164.0p

6.00p

(4,493)

(5,196)

(3,881)

(1,315)

(2,387)

(1,111)

10,270

3,001

13,271

833

14,104

1,969

16,073

150,5p

0p

3,658

3,027

4,493

(1,466)

5,868

7,457

11,565

1,629

13,194

1,119

14,313

5,619

19,932

186.7p

1.00p

6,526

5,959

6,397

(438)

8,587

9,088

13,045

1,357

14,402

887

15,289

4,280

19,569

183.3p

6.00p

3,763

1,485

3,317

(1,832)

3,734

5,819

13,245

925

14,170

1,050

15,220

1,922

17,142

160.6p

5.00p

16 June 2022

Late August 2022

Late April 2023

Annual General Meeting

Announcement of half-year results to 30 June 2022

Announcement of results for year ending 31 December 2022

24 Bisichi PLC

Governance
Directors’ report
The directors submit their report together with the audited financial 
statements for the year ended 31 December 2021.

Review of business, future 
developments and post 
balance sheet events
The Group continues its mining activities. 
Income for the year was derived from 
sales of coal from its South African 
operations. The Group also has a 
property investment portfolio for which it 
receives rental income and a joint venture 
investment in a UK residential property 
development.

The results for the year and state of 
affairs of the Group and the company  
at 31 December 2021 are shown on 
pages 54 to 99 and in the Strategic 
Report on pages 2 to 22. Future 
developments and prospects are also 
covered in the Strategic Report and 
further details of any post balance sheet 
events can be found in note 32 to the 
financial statements. Over 98 per cent  
of staff are employed in the South African 
coal mining industry – employment 
matters and health and safety are dealt 
with in the Strategic Report.

The management report referred to in  
the Director’s responsibilities statement 
encompasses this Directors’ Report and 
Strategic Report on pages 2 to 22. 

Corporate responsibility
Environment 
The environmental considerations of the 
Group’s South African coal mining 
operations are covered in the Strategic 
Report on pages 2 to 22.

The Group’s UK activities are principally 
property investment whereby premises 
are provided for rent to retail businesses 

and a joint venture investment in a UK 
residential property development.

The Group seeks to provide those 
tenants with good quality premises from 
which they can operate in an efficient and 
environmentally friendly manner. 
Wherever possible, improvements, repairs 
and replacements are made in an 
environmentally efficient manner and 
waste re-cycling arrangements are in 
place at all the company’s locations.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Details of the Group’s greenhouse gas 
emissions for the year ended 31 
December 2021 can be found on page 10 
of the Strategic Report.
Employment
The Group’s policy is to attract staff and 
motivate employees by offering 
competitive terms of employment. The 
Group provides equal opportunities to all 
employees and prospective employees 
including those who are disabled. The 
Strategic Report gives details of the 
Group’s activities and policies concerning 
the employment, training, health and 
safety and community support and social 
development concerning the Group’s 
employees in South Africa.

Dividend policy 
As outlined in the Strategic report on page 
2 the directors are proposing the payment 
of a dividend of 4p (2020: 0p) and a 
special dividend of 2p (2020: Nil) per 
share for 2021. No interim dividend for 
2021 has been paid (Interim 2020: 0p).

The total dividend per ordinary share for 
2021 will therefore be 6p (2020: 0p) per 
ordinary share.

Investment properties and 
other properties
The investment property portfolio is 
stated at its open market value of 
£10,525,000 at 31 December 2021 
(2020: £10,270,000) as valued by 
professional external valuers. The open 
market value of the company’s share of 
investment properties and development 
property inventory held at cost included 
within its investments in joint ventures is 
£4,787,000 (2020: £4,597,000). 

Financial instruments
Note 22 to the financial statements sets 
out the risks in respect of financial 
instruments. The Board reviews and 
agrees overall treasury policies, 
delegating appropriate authority to the 
managing director. Treasury operations 
are reported at each Board meeting and 
are subject to weekly internal reporting. 

Directors
The directors of the company for the year 
were Sir Michael Heller, A R Heller, G J 
Casey, C A Joll, R J Grobler (a South 
African citizen), J A Sibbald and J Wong.

The directors retiring by rotation are Sir M 
A Heller, Mr C A Joll and Mr J A Sibbald 
who offers themselves for re-election. 

Sir Michael Heller has been an executive 
Director since 1972 and Chairman since 
1981. He is a Chartered Accountant and 
has a contract of employment 
determinable at six months’ notice. 

Bisichi PLC

2525

Governance Directors’ report

Christopher Joll was appointed a Director 
on 1 February 2001. He has held a number 
of non-executive directorships of quoted 
and un-quoted companies and currently 
runs his own event management business. 
He is also a published author, lecturer and 
a writer and director of documentary films.

John Sibbald has been a non-executive 
Director since 1988. He is a retired 
Chartered Accountant. For most of his 
career he was employed in stockbroking 
in the City of London where he 
specialised in mining and international 
investment. He has a contract of service 
determinable at three months’ notice.

No director had any material interest in 
any contract or arrangement with the 
company during the year other than as 
shown in this report.

Directors’ shareholdings
The interests of the directors in the 
shares of the company, including family 
and trustee holdings where appropriate, 
are shown on page 34 of the Annual 
Remuneration Report. 

Substantial interests 
The following have advised that they have 
an interest in 3 per cent. or more of the 
issued share capital of the company as at 
13 April 2022: 

London & Associated Properties PLC – 
4,432,618 shares representing 41.52 per 
cent. of the issued capital. (Sir Michael 
Heller is a director and shareholder of 
London & Associated Properties PLC).

Sir Michael 
Heller 

A R Heller 

330,117 shares 
representing 3.09 per 
cent. of the issued capital.

785,012 shares 
representing 7.35 per 
cent. of the issued capital.

26 Bisichi PLC

Stonehage 
Fleming 
Investment 
Management 
Ltd – 

1,981,154 shares 
representing 18.56 per 
cent. of the issued share 
capital.

James Hyslop  345,000 shares 

representing 3.23 per 
cent. of the issued share 
capital.

Disclosure of information to 
auditor 
The directors in office at the date of 
approval of the financial statements have 
confirmed that as far as they are aware 
that there is no relevant audit information 
of which the auditor is unaware. Each of 
the directors has confirmed that they 
have taken all reasonable steps they 
ought to have taken as directors to make 
themselves aware of any relevant audit 
information and to establish that it has 
been communicated to the auditor.

Indemnities and insurance
The Articles of Association and 
Constitution of the company provide for 
them to indemnify, to the extent permitted 
by law, directors and officers (excluding 
the Auditor) of the companies, including 
officers of subsidiaries, and associated 
companies against liabilities arising from 
the conduct of the Group’s business. The 
indemnities are qualifying third-party 
indemnity provisions for the purposes of 
the UK Companies Act 2006 and each of 
these qualifying third-party indemnities 
was in force during the course of the 
financial year ended 31 December 2021 
and as at the date of this Directors’ 
report. No amount has been paid under 
any of these indemnities during the year. 

The Group has purchased directors’ and 
officers’ insurance during the year. In 
broad terms, the insurance cover 
indemnifies individual directors and 
officers against certain personal legal 
liability and legal defence costs for claims 
arising out of actions taken in connection 
with Group business. 

Corporate Governance
The Board acknowledges the importance of 
good corporate governance. The 
paragraphs below set out how the company 
has applied this guidance during the year. 

Principles of corporate 
governance
The Group’s Board appreciates the value 
of good corporate governance not only in 
the areas of accountability and risk 
management, but also as a positive 
contribution to business prosperity. The 
Board endeavours to apply corporate 
governance principles in a sensible and 
pragmatic fashion having regard to the 
circumstances of the Group’s business. 
The key objective is to enhance and 
protect shareholder value.

Board structure
During the year the Board comprised the 
executive chairman, the managing 
director, two other executive directors 
and three non-executive directors. Their 
details appear on page 23. The Board is 
responsible to shareholders for the 
proper management of the Group. The 
Directors’ responsibilities statement in 
respect of the accounts is set out on 
page 43. The non-executive directors 
have a particular responsibility to ensure 
that the strategies proposed by the 
executive directors are fully considered. 

 
Governance Directors’ report

• 
• 

To enable the Board to discharge its duties, 
all directors have full and timely access to all 
relevant information and there is a 
procedure for all directors, in furtherance of 
their duties, to take independent 
professional advice, if necessary, at the 
expense of the Group. The Board has a 
formal schedule of matters reserved to it 
and meets bi-monthly.

The Board is responsible for overall Group 
strategy, approval of major capital 
expenditure projects and consideration of 
significant financing matters.

• 
• 

The following Board committees, which 
have written terms of reference, deal with 
specific aspects of the Group’s affairs:
• 
• 

 The nomination committee comprises of 
two non-executive directors C A Joll 
(Chairman) and JA Sibbald as well as the 
executive chairman. The committee is 
responsible for proposing candidates for 
appointment to the Board, having regard 
to the balance and structure of the 
Board. In appropriate cases recruitment 
consultants are used to assist the 
process. Each director is subject to 
re-election at least every three years.
 The remuneration committee is 
responsible for making recommendations 
to the Board on the company’s 
framework of executive remuneration and 
its cost. The committee determines the 
contractual terms, remuneration and 
other benefits for each of the executive 
directors, including performance related 
bonus schemes, pension rights and 
compensation payments. The Board itself 
determines the remuneration of the 
non-executive directors. The committee 
comprises of two non-executive directors 
C A Joll (Chairman) and JA Sibbald. The 
company’s executive chairman is 
normally invited to attend meetings. The 
report on directors’ remuneration is set 
out on pages 32 to 39.

 The audit committee comprises of two 
non-executive directors C A Joll 
(Chairman) and JA Sibbald. Its prime 
tasks are to review the scope of external 
audit, to receive regular reports from the 
company’s auditor and to review the 
half-yearly and annual accounts before 
they are presented to the Board, 
focusing in particular on accounting 
policies and areas of management 
judgment and estimation. The committee 
is responsible for monitoring the controls 
which are in force to ensure the integrity 
of the information reported to the 
shareholders. The committee acts as a 
forum for discussion of internal control 
issues and contributes to the Board’s 
review of the effectiveness of the 
Group’s internal control and risk 
management systems and processes. 
The committee also considers annually 
the need for an internal audit function. It 
advises the Board on the appointment of 
external auditors and on their 
remuneration for both audit and 
non-audit work, and discusses the 
nature and scope of the audit with the 
external auditors. The committee, which 
meets formally at least twice a year, 
provides a forum for reporting by the 
Group’s external auditors.

Meetings are also attended, by invitation, 
by the company chairman, managing 
director and finance director.

The audit committee also undertakes a 
formal assessment of the auditors’ 
independence each year which includes:
• 
• 

 a review of non-audit services provided 
to the Group and related fees;
 discussion with the auditors of a written 
report detailing consideration of any 
matters that could affect independence 
or the perception of independence;

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 a review of the auditors’ own procedures 
for ensuring the independence of the 
audit firm and partners and staff involved 
in the audit, including the regular rotation 
of the audit partner; and
 obtaining written confirmation from the 
auditors that, in their professional 
judgement, they are independent.

The audit committee report is set out on 
page 40. 

An analysis of the fees payable to the 
external audit firm in respect of both audit 
and non-audit services during the year is 
set out in Note 5 to the financial statements.

Performance evaluation – 
board, board committees and 
directors
The performance of the board as a whole 
and of its committees and the non-
executive directors is assessed by the 
chairman and the managing director and 
is discussed with the senior independent 
director. Their recommendations are 
discussed at the nomination committee 
prior to proposals for re-election being 
recommended to the Board. The 
performance of executive directors is 
discussed and assessed by the 
remuneration committee. The senior 
independent director meets regularly with 
the chairman and both the executive and 
non-executive directors individually 
outside of formal meetings. The directors 
will take outside advice in reviewing 
performance but have not found this 
necessary to date.

Bisichi PLC

2727

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Governance Directors’ report

Independent directors
The senior independent non-executive 
director is Christopher Joll. The other two 
independent non-executive directors are 
John Sibbald and John Wong. 

Christopher Joll has been a non-
executive director for over twenty years, 
John Sibbald has been a non-executive 
director for over thirty years and John 
Wong was appointed to the Board on 15 
October 2020. The Board encourages 
the non-executive directors to act 
independently. The board considers that 
their length of service does not, and has 
not, resulted in their inability or failure to 
act independently. In the opinion of the 
Board, Christopher Joll and John Sibbald 
continue to fulfil their role as independent 
non-executive directors.

The independent directors regularly meet 
prior to Board meetings to discuss 
corporate governance issues.

Internal control
The directors are responsible for the 
Group’s system of internal control and 
review of its effectiveness annually. The 
Board has designed the Group’s system of 
internal control in order to provide the 
directors with reasonable assurance that its 
assets are safeguarded, that transactions 
are authorised and properly recorded and 
that material errors and irregularities are 
either prevented or would be detected 
within a timely period. However, no system 
of internal control can eliminate the risk of 
failure to achieve business objectives or 
provide absolute assurance against 
material misstatement or loss.

The key elements of the control system in 
operation are:
• 
• 

  the Board meets regularly with a formal 
schedule of matters reserved to it for 
decision and has put in place an 

28 Bisichi PLC

Board and board committee meetings
The number of meetings during 2021 and attendance at regular Board meetings and 
Board committees was as follows:

Meetings  

Meetings 
Attended

Sir Michael Heller

A R Heller

G J Casey

R J Grobler

C A Joll

J A Sibbald

Board
Nomination committee
Audit committee

Board
Audit committee

Board
Audit committee

Board

Board 
Audit committee
Nomination committee
Remuneration committee

Board
Audit committee
Nomination committee
Remuneration committee

held

5
1
2

5
2

5
2

5

5
2
1
1

5
2
1
1

5

5
1
2

5
2

5
2

1

5
2
1
1

2
0
1
0

1

J Wong

Board

• 
• 

• 
• 

organisational structure with clearly 
defined lines of responsibility and with 
appropriate delegation of authority;
  there are established procedures for 
planning, approval and monitoring of 
capital expenditure and information 
systems for monitoring the Group’s 
financial performance against approved 
budgets and forecasts;
  UK property and financial operations are 
closely monitored by members of the 
Board and senior managers to enable 
them to assess risk and address the 
adequacy of measures in place for its 
monitoring and control. The South 
African operations are closely supervised 
by the UK based executives through 
daily, weekly and monthly reports from 
the directors and senior officers in South 
Africa. This is supplemented by regular 
visits by the UK based finance director to 

the South African operations which 
include checking the integrity of 
information supplied to the UK. The 
directors are guided by the internal 
control guidance for directors issued by 
the Institute of Chartered Accountants in 
England and Wales.

During the period, the audit committee has 
reviewed the effectiveness of internal 
control as described above. The Board 
receives periodic reports from its 
committees.

There were no significant issues identified 
during the year ended 31 December 2021 
(and up to the date of approval of the 
report) concerning material internal control 
issues. The directors confirm that the 
Board has reviewed the effectiveness of the 
system of internal control as described 
during the period.

 
 
 
Governance Directors’ report

Communication with 
shareholders
Communication with shareholders is a 
matter of priority. Extensive information 
about the Group and its activities is given 
in the Annual Report, which is made 
available to shareholders. Further 
information is available on the company’s 
website, www.bisichi.co.uk. There is a 
regular dialogue with institutional 
investors. Enquiries from individuals on 
matters relating to their shareholdings 
and the business of the Group are dealt 
with informatively and promptly.

Takeover directive
The company has one class of share 
capital, ordinary shares. Each ordinary 
share carries one vote. All the ordinary 
shares rank pari passu. There are no 
securities issued in the company which 
carry special rights with regard to control of 
the company. The identity of all substantial 
direct or indirect holders of securities in the 
company and the size and nature of their 
holdings is shown under the “Substantial 
interests” section of this report above.

A relationship agreement dated 15 
September 2005 (the “Relationship 
Agreement”) was entered into between the 
company and London & Associated 
Properties PLC (“LAP”) in regard to the 
arrangements between them whilst LAP is 
a controlling shareholder of the company. 
The Relationship Agreement includes a 
provision under which LAP has agreed to 
exercise the voting rights attached to the 
ordinary shares in the company owned by 
LAP to ensure the independence of the 
Board of directors of the company.

Other than the restrictions contained in the 
Relationship Agreement, there are no 
restrictions on voting rights or on the 
transfer of ordinary shares in the company. 
The rules governing the appointment and 
replacement of directors, alteration of the 
articles of association of the company and 
the powers of the company’s directors 
accord with usual English company law 

provisions. Each director is re-elected at 
least every three years. The company is not 
party to any significant agreements that 
take effect, alter or terminate upon a 
change of control of the company following 
a takeover bid. The company is not aware 
of any agreements between holders of its 
ordinary shares that may result in 
restrictions on the transfer of its ordinary 
shares or on voting rights.

There are no agreements between the 
company and its directors or employees 
providing for compensation for loss of 
office or employment that occurs because 
of a takeover bid.

The Bribery Act 2010
The Bribery Act 2010 came into force on 
1 July 2011, and the Board took the 
opportunity to implement a new Anti-
Bribery Policy. The company is committed 
to acting ethically, fairly and with integrity 
in all its endeavours and compliance of 
the code is closely monitored.

Annual General Meeting
The annual general meeting of the company 
(“Annual General Meeting”) will be held at 
Meeting Room 2, 12 Charles II Street, St 
James, London SW1Y 4QU on Thursday, 
16 June 2022 at 11.00 a.m. Resolutions  
1 to 10 will be proposed as ordinary 
resolutions. More than 50 per cent. of 
shareholders’ votes cast must be in 
favour for those resolutions to be passed.  

The directors consider that all of the 
resolutions to be put to the meeting are in 
the best interests of the company and its 
shareholders as a whole. The Board 
recommends that shareholders vote in 
favour of all resolutions.

Please note that the following paragraph 
is a summary of resolution 10 to be 
proposed at the Annual General Meeting 
and not the full text of the resolution. You 
should therefore read this section in 
conjunction with the full text of the 
resolutions contained in the notice of 
Annual General Meeting.

Directors’ authority to allot 
shares (Resolution 10)
In certain circumstances it is important 
for the company to be able to allot shares 
up to a maximum amount without 
needing to seek shareholder approval 
every time an allotment is required. 
Paragraph 10.1.1 of resolution 10 would 
give the directors the authority to allot 
shares in the company and grant rights  
to subscribe for, or convert any security 
into, shares in the company up to an 
aggregate nominal value of £355,894. 
This represents approximately 1/3 (one 
third) of the ordinary share capital of the 
company in issue (excluding treasury 
shares) at 13 April 2022 (being the last 
practicable date prior to the publication  
of this Directors’ Report). Paragraph 
10.1.2 of resolution 10 would give the 
directors the authority to allot shares in 
the company and grant rights to 
subscribe for, or convert any security 
into, shares in the company up to a 
further aggregate nominal value of 
£355,894, in connection with a pre-
emptive rights issue. This amount 
represents approximately 1/3 (one third) 
of the ordinary share capital of the 
company in issue (excluding treasury 
shares) at 13 April 2022 (being the last 
practicable date prior to the publication  
of this Directors’ Report).
Therefore, the maximum nominal value  
of shares or rights to subscribe for, or 
convert any security into, shares which 
may be allotted or granted under resolution 
10 is £711,788. Resolution 10 complies 
with guidance issued by the Investment 
Association (IA).
The authority granted by resolution 109 
will expire on 31 August 2023 or, if earlier, 
the conclusion of the next annual general 
meeting of the company. The directors 
have no present intention to make use of 
this authority. However, if they do exercise 
the authority, the directors intend to 
follow emerging best practice as regards 
its use as recommended by the IA.

Bisichi PLC

2929

Governance Directors’ report

Donations
No political donations were made during 
the year (2020: £nil).

Going concern
The Group’s business activities, together 
with the factors likely to affect its future 
development are set out in the 
Chairman’s Statement on the preceding 
page 2, the Mining Review on pages 5 to 
6 and its financial position is set out on 
page 21 of the Strategic Report. In 
addition Note 22 to the financial 
statements includes the Group’s treasury 
policy, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, 
foreign exchange risks and credit risk. 

In South Africa, a structured trade finance 
facility with Absa Bank Limited for 
R85million is held by Sisonke Coal 
Processing (Pty) Limited, a 100% 
subsidiary of Black Wattle Colliery (Pty) 
Limited. This facility comprises of a 
R85million revolving facility to cover the 
working capital requirements of the 
Group’s South African operations. The 
facility is renewable annually at 25 
January and is secured against inventory, 
debtors and cash that are held in the 
Group’s South African operations. The 
Directors do not foresee any reason why 
the facility will not continue to be renewed 
at the next renewal date, in line with prior 
periods and based on their banking 
relationships. 

The directors expect that the coal market 
conditions experienced by its South 
African coal mining and processing 
operations in 2021 will be similar going 
into 2022. The directors therefore have a 
reasonable expectation that the mine will 
achieve positive levels of cash generation 
for the Group in 2022. As a 
consequence, the directors believe that 
the Group is well placed to manage its 
South African business risks successfully. 

In the UK, forecasts demonstrate that the 
Group has sufficient resources to meet 
its liabilities as they fall due for at least 
the next 12 months, from the approval of 
the financial statements, including those 
related to the Group’s UK Loan facility 
outlined below. 

The Group holds a 5 year term facility of 
£3.9m with Julian Hodge Bank Limited at 
an initial LTV of 40%. The loan is secured 
against the company’s UK retail property 
portfolio. The amount repayable on the 
loan at year end was £3.9million. The 
debt package has a five year term and is 
repayable at the end of the term in 
December 2024. In the last quarter of 
2021 the base interest rate on the loan 
changed from LIBOR to the Bank of 
England base rate. The overall interest 
cost of the loan is 4.00% above the Bank 
of England base rate. All covenants on 
the loan were met during the year and the 
directors have a reasonable expectation 
that the Group has adequate financial 
resources at short notice, including cash 
and listed equity investments, to ensure 
the existing facility’s covenants are met 
on an ongoing basis. 

Dragon Retail Properties Limited 
(“Dragon”), the Group’s 50% owned joint 
venture, holds a Santander bank loan of 
£1.2million secured against its investment 
property, see note 14. The bank loan of 
£1.164million is secured by way of a first 
charge on specific freehold property at a 
value of £2.08 million. The interest cost 
of the loan is 2.75 per cent above the 
bank’s base rate. A refinancing of this 
loan is currently underway. The loan 
originally expired in October 2020 but 
has been extended to April 2022, and the 
lender has offered to extend this further if 
required. Dragon has agreed terms with a 
new lender to refinance this loan in full 
and are expecting to complete this 
shortly.

Subsequent to year end in the first 
quarter of 2022 geo-political events in 
Ukraine resulted in higher global energy 
prices. Although the final outcome of the 
events in Ukraine is uncertain, the 
Directors at present do not foresee the 
events having a significant negative 
impact on the Group’s UK and South 
African operations ability to remain in 
operation for the foreseeable future. 

Detailed budget and cash flow forecasts 
for the Group’s operations demonstrated 
that the Group has sufficient resources to 
meet its liabilities as they fall due for at 
least the next 12 months and the 
Directors believe the Group would be able 
to manage its business risks and have 
adequate cash resources to continue in 
operational existence for the foreseeable 
future. As a result of the banking facilities 
held as well as the acceptable levels of 
cash expected to be held by the Group 
over the next 12 months, the Directors 
believe that the Group has adequate 
resources to continue in operational 
existence for the foreseeable future and 
that the Group is well placed to manage 
its business risks. Thus they continue to 
adopt the going concern basis of 
accounting in preparing the annual 
financial statements.

By order of the board

G.J Casey 
Secretary

12 Little Portland Street 
London W1W8BJ 

13 April 2022

30 Bisichi PLC

Governance
Statement of the Chairman of 
the remuneration committee
The remuneration committee presents its report for the year 
ended 31 December 2021. The report is presented in two parts 
in accordance with the remuneration regulations.

Both of the above reports have been 
prepared in accordance with The Large & 
Medium-sized Companies and Groups 
(Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) 
Regulations 2013.

The company’s auditors, Kreston reeves 
LLP are required by law to audit certain 
disclosures and where disclosures have 
been audited they are indicated as such.

Christopher Joll 
Chairman – remuneration committee

12 Little Portland Street 
London W1W8BJ

13 April 2022

The first part is the Annual Remuneration 
Report which details remuneration 
awarded to Directors and non-executive 
Directors during the year. The shareholders 
will be asked to approve the Annual 
Remuneration Report as an ordinary 
resolution (as in previous years) at the 
AGM in June 2022. During the year, in light 
of the performance of the Group, the 
board determined to award bonuses to 
certain executive directors of the Group. 

The second part is the Remuneration 
Policy which details the remuneration 
policy for Directors, and can be found at 
www.bisichi.co.uk. The current 
remuneration policy was subject to a 
binding vote which was approved by 
shareholders at the AGM in July 2020. 
The approval will continue to apply for a 3 
year period commencing from then. The 
committee reviewed the existing policy 
and deemed that no changes were 
necessary to the current arrangements. 

Bisichi PLC

3131

Governance
Annual remuneration report

The following information has been audited:

Single total figure of remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2021:

Salaries 
and Fees 
£’000

Benefits 
£’000

Bonuses 
£’000

Long Term 
Incentive 
Awards 
£’000

Pension 
£’000

Executive Directors
Sir Michael Heller

A R Heller

G J Casey

R Grobler

Non–Executive Directors
C A Joll*

J A Sibbald*
J Wong (appointed 15 October 
2021)

83

495

185

205

40

3
50

-

34

17

11

-

3
-

-

400

200

176

-

-
-

Total

1,061

65

776

*Members of the remuneration committee for the year ended 31 December 2021 

Single total figure of remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2020:

-

-

-

-

-

-
-

-

Total 
Fixed 
Remuner-
ation
£’000

Total 
Variable 
Remuner-
ation
£’000

Total
2021 
£’000

83

929

421

409

40

6
50

83

529

221

233

40

6
50

-

400

200

176

-

-
-

-

-

19

17

-

-
-

36

1,938

1,162

776

Salaries 
and Fees 
£’000

Benefits 
£’000

Bonuses 
£’000

Long Term 
Incentive 
Awards 
£’000

Pension 
£’000

Total 
Fixed 
Remuner-
ation
£’000

Total 
Variable 
Remuner-
ation
£’000

Total
2020
£’000

Executive Directors
Sir Michael Heller

A R Heller

G J Casey

R Grobler

Non–Executive Directors
C A Joll*
J A Sibbald*

J Wong (appointed 15 October 
2020)

83

495

154

193

40
3

12

-

56

20

10

-
3

-

Total

980

88

*Members of the remuneration committee for the year ended 31 December 2020 

-

-

-

-

-
-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-

-

-

-

-

11

16

-
-

-

83

551

185

219

40
6

12

83

551

185

219

40
6

12

27

1,096

1,096

-

-

-

-

-
-

-

-

32 Bisichi PLC

Governance Annual remuneration report

Summary of directors’ terms

Executive directors
Sir Michael Heller

A R Heller

G J Casey
R J Grobler

Non-executive directors
C A Joll

J A Sibbald
J Wong

Date of  
contract

Unexpired 
term

Notice  
period

November 1972 Continuous

January 1994

Continuous

June 2010
April 2008

Continuous
Continuous

February 2001

Continuous

October 1988
October 2020

Continuous
Continuous

6 months

3 months

3 months
3 months

3 months

3 months
3 months

Pension schemes and incentives 
Two (2020: Two) directors have benefits under money purchase pension schemes. Contributions in 2021 were £35,177 (2020: 
£27,323), see table above. There are no additional benefits payable to any director in the event of early retirement.

Scheme interests awarded during the year
During the year no share options were granted under share option schemes. 

Share option schemes
The company currently has only one Unapproved Share Option Scheme which is not subject to HM revenue and Customs (HMRC) 
approval. The 2012 scheme was approved by the remuneration committee of the company on 28 September 2012. 

Number of share options
Options 
granted/
(Surren-
dered)
in 
2021

31
December 
2021

Exercisable 
from

Exercisable 
to

-

-

-
-

150,000

18/09/2015 17/09/2025

150,000 06/02/2018 06/02/2028

150,000
18/09/2015 17/09/2025
230,000 06/02/2018 06/02/2028

Option 
price*

1 January
2021

87.01p

73.50p

87.01p
73.50p

150,000

150,000

150,000
230,000

The 2012 Scheme
A R Heller

A R Heller

G J Casey
G J Casey

*Middle market price at date of grant

No consideration is payable for the grant of options under the 2012 Unapproved Share Option Scheme. There are no performance 
or service conditions attached to the 2012 Unapproved Share Option scheme. No part of the award was attributable to share price 
appreciation and no discretion has been exercised as a result of share price appreciation or depreciation.  During the year, there 
were no changes to the exercise price or exercise period for the options.

Bisichi PLC

3333

Governance Annual remuneration report

Payments to past directors
No payments were made to past directors in the year ended 31 December 2021 (2020: £nil).

Payments for loss of office
No payments for loss of office were made in the year ended 31 December 2021 (2020: £nil).

Statement of Directors’ shareholding and share interest
Directors’ interests
The interests of the directors in the shares of the company, including family and trustee holdings where appropriate, were as follows:

Sir Michael Heller

A R Heller

R J Grobler

G J Casey

C A Joll 

J A Sibbald
J Wong

Beneficial

Non-beneficial

31.12.2021

1.1.2021

31.12.2021

148,783

785,012

-

148,783

785,012

-

40,000

40,000

-

-
-

-

-
-

181,334

-

-

-

-

-
-

1.1.2021

181,334

-

-

-

-

-
-

There are no requirements or guidelines for any director to own shares in the Company.

The following section is 
unaudited.
The following graph illustrates the 
company’s performance compared 
with a broad equity market index over 
a ten year period. Performance is 
measured by total shareholder return. 
The directors have chosen the FTSE 
All Share Mining index as a suitable 
index for this comparison as it gives 
an indication of performance against 
a spread of quoted companies in the 
same sector.

The middle market price of Bisichi 
PLC ordinary shares at 31 December 
2021 was 60p (2020: 109p). During 
the year the share price ranged 
between 45p and 120p.

)
d
e
s
a
b
e
r
(
e
c
i
r
P
e
r
a
h
S

160.00

140.00

120.00

100.00

80.00

60.00

40.00

20.00

34 Bisichi PLC

– Bisichi Mining

– FTSE All Share

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016 

2017

2018

2019

2020

 
 
Governance Annual remuneration report

Remuneration of the Managing Director over the last ten years
The table below demonstrates the remuneration of the holder of the office of 
Managing Director for the last ten years for the period from 1 January 2012 
to 31 December 2021.

Year
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012

Managing 
Director
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller
A R Heller

Managing 
Director 
Single total 
figure of
remuneration
£’000
929
551
1,035
1,073
898
850
912
862
614
721

Annual  
bonus  
payout
against  

maximum
opportunity* 
%
27%
0%
34%
34%
25%
22%
22%
22%
N/A
N/A

Long-term 
incentive
vesting rates 
against 
maximum 
opportunity*
%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Bisichi PLC does not have a Chief Executive so the table includes the equivalent information for the Managing Director.

*There were no formal criteria or conditions to apply in determining the amount of bonus payable or the number of shares to be issued prior to 2014.

Percentage change in remuneration and Company performance

Director 
Executive:
Sir Michael Heller
A R Heller 1
G J Casey 1
R Grobler 1
Non-Executive:
C A Joll
J A Sibbald
J Wong 2
Employee remuneration on a full-time equivalent basis:
Employees of the Company 1&3

Base Salary 
% Change 
2021 v 2020

Benefits 
% Change 
2021 v 2020

Bonuses 
% Change 
2021 v 2020

0%
0%
20%
6%

0%
0%
0%

8%

0%
(39%)
(10%)
3%

0%
0%
0%

(26%)

0%
N/A
N/A
N/A

0%
0%
0%

N/A

1  Bonus changes from 2021 to 2020 for AR Heller, G J Casey, R Grobler and Employees of the Company are disclosed as not applicable as no bonuses were 

awarded to the various directors and employees in 2020. 

2  Mr J Wong was appointed as a non-executive Director on 15 October 2020 so the annual change is apportioned.

3  The comparator group chosen is all UK based employees as the remuneration committee believe this provides the most accurate comparison of underlying 

increases based on similar annual bonus performances utilised by the Group.

Bisichi PLC

3535

Governance Annual remuneration report

Relative importance of spend on pay
The total expenditure of the Group on remuneration to all employees (see Notes 29 and 9 to the financial statements) is shown below:

Employee remuneration
Distribution to shareholders (see note below)

2021
£’000

7,491
641

2020
£’000

5,890
-

The distribution to shareholders in the current year is subject to shareholder approval at next the Annual General Meeting.

Statement of implementation of remuneration policy
The remuneration policy was approved at the AGM on 9 July 2020. The policy took effect from the conclusion of the AGM and will 
apply for 3 years unless changes are deemed necessary by the remuneration committee. The company may not make a 
remuneration payment or payment for loss of office to a person who is, is to be, or has been a director of the company unless that 
payment is consistent with the approved remuneration policy, or has otherwise been approved by a resolution of members. During 
the year, there were no deviations from the procedure for the implementation of the remuneration policy as set out in the policy.

Consideration by the directors of matters relating to directors’ remuneration
The remuneration committee considered the executive directors remuneration and the board considered the non-executive 
directors remuneration in the year ended 31 December 2021. The Company did not engage any consultants to provide advice or 
services to materially assist the remuneration committee’s considerations.

Shareholder voting
At the Annual General Meeting on 22 June 2021, there was an advisory vote on the resolution to approve the remuneration report, 
other than the part containing the remuneration policy. In addition, on 9 July 2020 there was a binding vote on the resolution to 
approve the current remuneration policy the results of which are detailed below:

Resolution to approve the Remuneration Report (22 June 2021)
Resolution to approve the Remuneration Policy (9 July 2020)

% of votes 
for

% of votes
against

No of votes
withheld

72.05%
69.87%

27.95%
30.13%

-
-

The remuneration committee and directors have considered the percentage of votes against the resolutions to approve the 
remuneration report and policy. Reasons given by shareholders, as known by the directors, have been the level of remuneration 
awarded and the general remuneration policy itself. The remuneration committee consider the remuneration policy and 
performance conditions within remain appropriate and therefore no further action has been taken.

Service contracts
All executive directors have full-time contracts of employment with the company. Non-executive directors have contracts of service. 
No director has a contract of employment or contract of service with the company, its joint venture or associated companies with a 
fixed term which exceeds twelve months. Directors notice periods (see page 33 of the annual remuneration report) are set in line 
with market practice and of a length considered sufficient to ensure an effective handover of duties should a director leave the 
company. 

All directors’ contracts as amended from time to time, have run from the date of appointment. Service contracts are kept at the 
registered office. 

36 Bisichi PLC

Governance Annual remuneration report

Remuneration policy table
The remuneration policy table below is an extract of the Group’s current remuneration policy on directors’ remuneration, which was 
approved by a binding vote at the 2020 AGM. The approved policy took effect from 9 July 2020. A copy of the full policy can be 
found at www.bisichi.co.uk.

Element Purpose

Policy

Operation

Considered by remuneration 
committee on appointment.

Reviewed annually 

Paid monthly in cash

Executive directors
Base 
salary

To recognise:

Skills 
Responsibility
Accountability
Experience 
Value

Pension

To provide 
competitive 
retirement 
benefits

Set at a level considered 
appropriate to attract, retain 
motivate and reward the 
right individuals.

Company contribution 
offered at up to 10% of 
base salary as part of overall 
remuneration package.

Benefits

To provide a 
competitive 
benefits package

Contractual benefits can 
include but are not limited to:

Car or car allowance
Group health cover
Death in service cover
Permanent health insurance

Opportunity and performance 
conditions

No individual director will be awarded 
a base salary in excess of £700,000 
per annum.

No specific performance conditions 
are attached to base salaries.

The contribution payable 
by the company is included 
in the 

Company contribution offered at up to 
10% of base salary as part of overall 
remuneration package.

director’s contract of 
employment. 

No specific performance conditions 
are attached to pension contributions.

Paid into money purchase 
schemes
The committee retains 
absolute discretion to 
approve changes in 
contractual benefits in 
exceptional circumstances 
or where factors outside 
the control of the Group 
lead to increased costs (e.g. 
medical inflation)

The costs associated with benefits 
offered are closely controlled and 
reviewed on an annual basis.

No director will receive benefits of a 
value in excess of 30% of his base 
salary.

No specific performance conditions 
are attached to contractual benefits.

The value of benefits for each director 
for the year ended 31 December 2021 
is shown in the table on page 32.

Bisichi PLC

3737

 
 
 
Governance Annual remuneration report

Element Purpose

Policy

Operation

Opportunity and performance conditions

Annual 
Bonus

To reward and 
incentivise

In assessing the 
performance of the 
executive team, 
and in particular to 
determine whether 
bonuses are merited 
the remuneration 
committee takes 
into account the 
overall performance 
of the business. 

Bonuses are 
generally offered in 
cash

The remuneration 
committee 
determines the 
level of bonus on 
an annual basis 
applying such 
performance 
conditions and 
performance 
measures as 
it considers 
appropriate

Share 
Options

To provide executive 
directors with a 
long-term interest in 
the company

Granted under 
existing schemes 
(see page 33)

Offered at 
appropriate times 
by the remuneration 
committee

The current maximum bonus opportunity will not 
exceed 200% of base salary in any one year, but the 
remuneration committee reserves the power to award 
up to 300% in an exceptional year.

There is no formal framework by which the company 
assesses performance and performance conditions 
and measures will be assessed on an annual basis 
by the remuneration committee. In determining the 
level of the bonus, the remuneration committee will 
take into account internal and external factors and 
circumstances that occur during the year under 
review. The performance measures applied may 
be financial, non-financial, corporate, divisional or 
individual and in such proportion as the remuneration 
committee considers appropriate to the prevailing 
circumstances. The company does not consider, 
given the company’s size, nature and stage of 
operations that a formal framework is required.
Entitlement to share options is not subject to any 
specific performance conditions.

Share options will be offered by the remuneration 
committee as appropriate taking into account the 
factors considered above in the decision making 
process in determining remuneration policy. 

The aggregate number of shares over which options 
may be granted under all of the company’s option 
schemes (including any options and awards granted 
under the company’s employee share plans) in any 
period of ten years, will not exceed, at the time of 
grant, 10% of the ordinary share capital of the 
company from time to time. In determining the limits 
no account shall be taken of any shares where 
the right to acquire the shares has been released, 
lapsed or has otherwise become incapable of 
exercise.

The company currently has one Share Option 
Scheme (see page 33). For the 2012 scheme the 
remuneration committee has the ability to impose 
performance criteria in respect of any new share 
options granted, however there is no requirement 
to do so. There are no performance conditions 
attached to the options already issued under the 
2012 scheme, the options vest on issue and there 
are no minimum hold periods for the resulting 
shares issued on exercise of the option.

38 Bisichi PLC

 
Governance Annual remuneration report

Element Purpose

Policy

Operation

Opportunity and performance conditions

Non-executive directors
Base 
salary

To recognise:

Skills
Experience
Value

Pension

Benefits

Share 
Options

Reviewed annually No individual director will be awarded a base salary in excess of 

£60,000 per annum.

No specific performance conditions are attached to base 
salaries.

Considered by 
the board on 
appointment.

Set at a level 
considered 
appropriate to 
attract, retain 
and motivate the 
individual. 

Experience and 
time required 
for the role are 
considered on 
appointment.

No pension offered

The costs associated with the benefit offered is closely 
controlled and reviewed on an annual basis.

No director will receive benefits of a value in excess of 30% of 
his base salary.

No specific performance conditions are attached to contractual 
benefits.

The committee 
retains the 
discretion to 
approve changes in 
contractual benefits 
in exceptional 
circumstances 
or where factors 
outside the control 
of the Group lead to 
increased costs (e.g. 
medical inflation)

No benefits offered 
except 

to one non-
executive director 
who is eligible for 
health 

cover (see annual 
remuneration 
report 

page 32) 

Non-executive 
directors do not 
participate in 
the share option 
schemes

In order to ensure that shareholders have sufficient clarity over director remuneration levels, the company has, where possible, 
specified a maximum that may be paid to a director in respect of each component of remuneration. The remuneration committee 
consider the performance measures outlined in the table above to be appropriate measures of performance and that the KPI’s 
chosen align the interests of the directors and shareholders. 

Details of remuneration of other company employees can be found in Note 29 to the financial statements.

Bisichi PLC

3939

Governance
Audit committee report
The committee’s terms of reference have been approved by the board and 
follow published guidelines, which are available from the company secretary. 
The audit committee comprises the two non-executive directors, Christopher 
Joll (chairman), an experienced financial PR executive and John Sibbald, a 
retired chartered accountant.

• 
• 

• 
• 

  participate in the selection of a new 
external audit partner and agree the 
appointment when required; 
  undertake a formal assessment of the 
auditors’ independence each year 
which includes:

  ~  a review of non-audit services 

provided to the Group and related 
fees;

  ~  discussion with the auditors of a 

written report detailing all 
relationships with the company and 
any other parties that could affect 
independence or the perception of 
independence;

  ~  a review of the auditors’ own 
procedures for ensuring the 
independence of the audit firm and 
partners and staff involved in the 
audit, including the regular rotation of 
the audit partner; and

  ~  obtaining written confirmation from 

the auditors that, in their professional 
judgement, they are independent.

• 
• 

• 
• 

The Audit Committee’s prime tasks are to:
  review the scope of external audit, to 
• 
• 
receive regular reports from the auditor 
and to review the half-yearly and 
annual accounts before they are 
presented to the board, focusing in 
particular on accounting policies and 
areas of management judgment and 
estimation;
  monitor the controls which are in force 
to ensure the integrity of the 
information reported to the 
shareholders; 
  assess key risks and to act as a forum 
for discussion of risk issues and 
contribute to the board’s review of the 
effectiveness of the Group’s risk 
management control and processes; 
  act as a forum for discussion of internal 
control issues and contribute to the 
board’s review of the effectiveness of 
the Group’s internal control and risk 
management systems and processes;
  consider each year the need for an 
internal audit function;
  advise the board on the appointment of 
external auditors and rotation of the 
audit partner every five years, and on 
their remuneration for both audit and 
non-audit work, and discuss the nature 
and scope of their audit work;

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

40 Bisichi PLC

Meetings
The committee meets prior to the annual 
audit with the external auditors to discuss 
the audit plan and again prior to the 
publication of the annual results. These 
meetings are attended by the external 
audit partner, managing director, director 
of finance and company secretary. Prior to 
bi-monthly board meetings the members 
of the committee meet on an informal 
basis to discuss any relevant matters 
which may have arisen. Additional formal 
meetings are held as necessary. 

During the past year the committee:
• 
• 

  met with the external auditors, and 
discussed their reports to the Audit 
Committee;
  approved the publication of annual and 
half-year financial results;
  considered and approved the annual 
review of internal controls;
  decided that due to the size and nature 
of operation there was not a current 
need for an internal audit function;
  agreed the independence of the 
auditors and approved their fees for 
both audit related and non-audit 
services as set out in note 5 to the 
financial statements.

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Governance Audit committee report

Financial reporting 
As part of its role, the Audit Committee 
assessed the audit findings that were 
considered most significant to the 
financial statements, including those 
areas requiring significant judgment and/
or estimation. When assessing the 
identified financial reporting matters, the 
committee assessed quantitative 
materiality primarily by reference to profit 
before tax. The Board also gave 
consideration to:
• 
• 

  the carrying value of the Group’s total 
assets, given that the Group operates a 
principally asset based business;
  the value of revenues generated by the 
Group, given the importance of coal 
production and processing; 
  Adjusted EBITDA, given that it is a key 
trading KPI, when determining 
quantitative materiality; and 
  Going concern, given the potential 
impact of macro-economic activity on 
the Group’s operations. 

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

External Auditors 
Kreston Reeves LLP were appointed as 
the statutory auditors during the year and 
they have expressed their willingness to 
continue in office and a resolution to 
reappoint them will be proposed at the 
forthcoming Annual General Meeting. In 
the United Kingdom the company is 
provided with extensive administration 
and accounting services by London & 
Associated Properties PLC which has its 
own audit committee and employs a 
separate firm of external auditors, RSM 
UK Audit LLP. BDO South Africa Inc. acts 
as the external auditor to the South 
African companies, and the work of that 
firm was reviewed by Kreston Reeves LLP 
for the purpose of the Group audit. 

Christopher Joll 
Chairman – audit committee

12 Little Portland Street 
London W1W8BJ

13 April 2022

The qualitative aspects of any financial 
reporting matters identified during the 
audit process were also considered when 
assessing their materiality. Based on the 
considerations set out above we have 
considered quantitative errors individually 
or in aggregate in excess of 
approximately £300,000 to £350,000 to 
be material.

Bisichi PLC

4141

 
 
 
 
Governance
Valuers’ certificates
To the directors of Bisichi PLC

In accordance with your instructions we have carried out a valuation of the freehold property interests held as at 31 December 
2021 by the company as detailed in our Valuation Report dated 16 February 2022.

Having regard to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the open market value as at 31 December 2021 of the interests owned 
by the company was £10,525,000 being made up as follows:

Freehold
Leasehold

Leeds 
16 February 2022

£’000

8,230
2,295

10,525

Carter Towler
Regulated by Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors

42 Bisichi PLC

Governance
Directors’ responsibilities statement
The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the 
financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. 

Company law requires the directors to 
prepare financial statements for each 
financial year. Under that law the directors 
are required to prepare the Group 
financial statements in accordance with 
UK-adopted international accounting 
standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006. 
The directors have elected to prepare the 
company financial statements in 
accordance with United Kingdom 
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice 
(United Kingdom Accounting Standards 
and applicable law). Under company law 
the directors must not approve the 
financial statements unless they are 
satisfied that they give a true and fair view 
of the state of affairs of the Group and 
company and of the profit or loss for the 
Group for that period. 

• 
• 

• 
• 

In preparing these financial statements, 
the directors are required to:
• 
• 

  select suitable accounting policies and 
then apply them consistently;
  make judgements and accounting 
estimates that are reasonable and 
prudent;
  state with regard to the Group financial 
statements whether they have been 
prepared in accordance with UK-
adopted international accounting 
standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006 subject to any material 
departures disclosed and explained in 
the financial statements;

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

  state with regard to the parent 
company financial statements, whether 
applicable UK accounting standards 
have been followed, subject to any 
material departures disclosed and 
explained in the financial statements; 
  prepare the financial statements on the 
going concern basis unless it is 
inappropriate to presume that the 
company and the Group will continue in 
business; and
  prepare a director’s report, a strategic 
report and director’s remuneration 
report which comply with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006.

The directors are responsible for keeping 
adequate accounting records that are 
sufficient to show and explain the 
company’s transactions and disclose with 
reasonable accuracy at any time the 
financial position of the company and 
enable them to ensure that the financial 
statements comply with the Companies 
Act 2006 and, as regards the Group 
financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS 
Regulation. They are also responsible for 
safeguarding the assets of the company 
and hence for taking reasonable steps for 
the prevention and detection of fraud and 
other irregularities. The Directors are 
responsible for ensuring that the annual 
report and accounts, taken as a whole, are 
fair, balanced, and understandable and 
provides the information necessary for 
shareholders to assess the Group’s 
performance, business model and strategy.

Website publication
The directors are responsible for ensuring 
the annual report and the financial 
statements are made available on a 
website. Financial statements are 
published on the company’s website in 
accordance with legislation in the United 
Kingdom governing the preparation and 
dissemination of financial statements, 
which may vary from legislation in other 
jurisdictions. The maintenance and 
integrity of the company’s website is the 
responsibility of the directors. The 
directors’ responsibility also extends to 
the ongoing integrity of the financial 
statements contained therein.

Directors’ responsibilities 
pursuant to DTR4
The directors confirm to the best of their 
knowledge:
• 
• 

  the Group financial statements have 
been prepared in accordance with 
UK-adopted international accounting 
standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006 and give a true and fair view of 
the assets, liabilities, financial position 
and profit and loss of the Group.
  the annual report includes a fair review 
of the development and performance of 
the business and the financial position 
of the Group and the parent company, 
together with a description of the 
principal risks and uncertainties that 
they face.

• 
• 

Bisichi PLC

4343

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

• 
• 

• 
• 

  the financial statements have been 
prepared in accordance with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006

Governance
Independent auditor report to the shareholders of 
Bisichi Plc for the year ended 31 December 2021
Opinion 
We have audited the financial statements 
of Bisichi PLC (the ‘parent company’) and 
its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the year 
ended 31 December 2021 which comprise 
the consolidated income statement, 
consolidated statement of other 
comprehensive income, consolidated and 
company balance sheets, consolidated 
and company statements of changes in 
equity, consolidated cash flow statement 
and notes to the financial statements, 
including a summary of significant Group 
accounting policies. The financial 
reporting framework that has been 
applied in their preparation of the group 
financial statements is applicable law and 
UK adopted international accounting 
standards. The financial reporting 
framework that has been applied in the 
preparation of the parent company 
financial statements is applicable law and 
United Kingdom Accounting Standards, 
including FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure 
Framework (United Kingdom Generally 
Accepted Accounting Practice).

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance 
with International Standards on Auditing 
(UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our 
responsibilities under those standards are 
further described in the Auditor’s 
responsibilities for the audit of the 
financial statements section of our report. 
We are independent of the Group in 
accordance with the ethical requirements 
that are relevant to our audit of the 
financial statements in the UK, including 
the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to 
listed entities, and we have fulfilled our 
other ethical responsibilities in 
accordance with these requirements. We 
believe that the audit evidence we have 
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to 
provide a basis for our opinion.

  Evidence obtained that management 
have undertaken a formal going concern 
assessment, including sensitivity 
analysis on cash flow forecasts, clear 
consideration of external factors 
including the COVID pandemic and the 
war in Ukraine and the potential liquidity 
impact of these on cash balances 
including available facilities.

  Analysed the financial strength of the 
business at the year end date and 
considered key trends in balance sheet 
strength and business performance 
over the last three years.

  Confirmations gained that operation of 
the business, including mine production 
and sale at Black Wattle Colliery have 
not been disrupted in the period by any 
external or internal factors.

  Testing the mechanical integrity of 
forecast model by checking the 
accuracy and completeness of the 
model, including challenging the 
appropriateness of estimates and 
assumptions with reference to empirical 
data and external evidence.

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

In our opinion, the financial statements:

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

  the financial statements give a true and 
fair view of the state of the Group’s and 
of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 
December 2021 and of the Group’s 
profit for the year then ended;

  the group financial statements have 
been properly prepared in accordance 
with UK adopted international 
accounting standards; 

  the parent company financial 
statements have been properly 
prepared in accordance with United 
Kingdom Generally Accepted 
Accounting Practice; and

44 Bisichi PLC

Conclusions relating to going 
concern
In auditing the financial statements, we 
have concluded that the Directors’ use of 
the going concern basis of accounting in 
the preparation of the financial 
statements is appropriate. Our evaluation 
of the directors assessment of the Group 
and Parent companies ability to continue 
to adopt the going concern basis of 
accounting including the following:

• 
• 

  Gained an understanding of the 
systems and controls around 
managements’ going concern 
assessment, including for the 
preparation and review process for 
forecasts and budgets.

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

  Based on our above assessment we 
performed our own sensitivity analysis 
in respect of the key assumptions 
underpinning the forecasts.

  We performed stress-testing analysis on 
the core cash generating units of the 
business to confirm cash inflow levels 
needed to maintain minimal liquidity 
required to meet liabilities as they fall due.

  We considered post year end 
performance of the business, 
comparing this to budget as well as 
considering the development of key 
liquidity ratios in the business.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

An overview of the scope of 
our audit
As part of designing our audit, we 
determined materiality and assessed the 
risks of material misstatement in the 
financial statements. In particular, we 
looked at where the directors made 
subjective judgements, for example in 
respect of significant accounting 
estimates that involved making 
assumptions and considering future 
events that are inherently uncertain. As in 
all of our audits we also addressed the 
risk of management override of internal 
controls, including evaluating whether 
there was evidence of bias by the 
directors that represented a risk of 
material misstatement due to fraud.

•   •    The group’s banking facility 

documentation was reviewed to ensure 
that any covenants in place have not 
been breached.

•   •    We reviewed the adequacy and 
completeness of the disclosure 
included within the financial statements 
in respect of going concern.

Based on the work we have performed, 
we have not identified any material 
uncertainties relating to events or 
conditions that, individually or collectively, 
may cast significant doubt on the entity’s 
ability to continue as a going concern for 
a period of at least twelve months from 
when the financial statements are 
authorised for issue.

In relation to the Group and Parent 
Company’s reporting on how they have 
applied the UK Corporate Governance 
Code, we have nothing material to add or 
draw attention to in relation to the 
directors’ statement in the financial 
statements about whether the directors 
considered it appropriate to adopt the 
going concern basis of accounting. 

Our responsibilities and the 
responsibilities of the directors with 
respect to going concern are described in 
the relevant sections of this report. 
However, because not all future events or 
conditions can be predicted, this 
statement is not a guarantee as to the 
Group’s and Parent Company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern.

Corporate Governance 
Statement 
The Listing Rules require us to review the 
directors’ statement in relation to going 
concern, longer-term viability and that 
part of the Corporate Governance 
Statement relating to the Group’s and 
Parent Company’s compliance with the 
provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code specified for our 
review. 

Based on the work undertaken as part of 
our audit, we have concluded that each of 
the following elements of the Corporate 
Governance Statement is materially 
consistent with the financial statements 
or our knowledge obtained during the audit: 

•   •   Directors’ statement with regards to the 
appropriateness of adopting the going 
concern basis of accounting and any 
material uncertainties identified set out 
on page 30; 

•   •   Directors’ explanation as to its 

assessment of the company’s prospects, 
the period this assessment covers and 
why the period is appropriate set out on 
page 22; 

•   •   Board’s confirmation that it has carried 
out a robust assessment of the emerging 
and principal risks set out on pages 11 
to 15; 

•   •   The section of the Annual Report that 

describes the review of effectiveness of 
risk management and internal control 
systems set out on page 28 and 

•   •   The section describing the work of the 
Risk and Audit Committee set out on 
page 27.

Bisichi PLC

4545

Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

Our application of materiality

Materiality

£359,600

£355,000

Group financial statements

Parent company financial statements

Basis for determining 
materiality

Rationale for benchmark 
applied

2% of net assets

Capped below group materiality

The group's principal activity of that of 
an exploration and mining operation and 
investment property holdings. To this end the 
business is highly asset focused. Therefore a 
benchmark for materiality of the NA's of the 
group is considered to be appropriate.

The parent company materiality has been 
capped at below group materiality. This was to 
address the aggregation risk in the group audit.

Performance materiality  £269,700

£269,600

Basis for determining 
performance materiality

Rationale for 
performance materiality 
applied

75% of materiality

Capped below group materiality

On the basis of our risk assessments, together 
with our assessment of the Group’s overall 
control environment, our judgement was 
that performance materiality was 75% of 
our planning materiality. In assessing the 
appropriate level, we consider the nature, the 
number and impact of the audit differences 
identified in the previous year’s audit.

The parent company performance materiality 
has been capped at below group performance 
materiality. This was to address the aggregation 
risk in the group audit.

Triviality threshold 

£17,980

£17,975

Basis for determining 
triviality threshold

5% of materiality 

Capped below group materiality

We reported all audit differences found in 
excess of our triviality threshold to the 
directors and the management board. For 
each Group company within the scope of 
our Group audit, we allocated a 
materiality that is less than our overall 
Group materiality. The range of 
materiality allocated across each Group 
company was between £227,000 and 
£23,300. The scope of our audit was 
influenced by our application of 

materiality as we set certain quantitative 
thresholds for performance materiality 
and use these thresholds as a 
consideration tool to help to determine 
the scope of our audit and the nature, 
timing and extent of our audit procedures 
on the individual financial statement line 
items and disclosures and in evaluating 
the effect of misstatements, both 
individually and in aggregate on the 
financial statements as a whole.

We determined component materiality for 
the parent company to be capped at 
below group materiality. This was also the 
case for group subsidiaries registered 
outside of the UK. For the UK-registered 
trading subsidiaries, 4% of that 
subsidiary’s net assets was used. 
Performance materiality was set in the 
range of 70-80% of component 
materiality.   

46 Bisichi PLC

Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

Coverage overview

Totals at 31 December 
2021:

Full statutory audit 
(Kreston Reeves and BDO)

Group revenue
£50,519,592

Group profit/(loss) before tax
£2,501,171

Group net assets
£17,835,066

£50,519,592 (100%)

£2,377,426 (95%)

£17,092,472 (96%)

Limited procedures

£Nil

£123,745 (5%)

£742,594 (4%)

We tailored the scope of our audit to 
ensure that we performed sufficient 
work to be able to give an opinion on 
the financial statements as a whole, 
taking into account the structure of the 
Group and the parent company, the 
accounting processes and controls, 

and the industry in which they operate.

Our scoping considerations for the 
Group audit were based both on 
financial information and risk. As noted 
above limited assurance audit work – 
which is to say the audit of balances 

and transactions material at a group 
level – was only applied in respect of a 
small element of the group. The below 
table summarises for the parent 
company, and its subsidiaries, in terms 
of the level of assurance gained:

Group component
Bisichi PLC

Mineral Products Limited

Bisichi (Properties) Limited

Bisichi Northampton Limited

Black Wattle Colliery (Pty) Limited

Sisonke Coal Processing (Pty) Limited

Black Wattle Klipfontein (Pty) Limited

Bisichi Coal Mining (Pty) Limited

All other group undertakings

Level of assurance
Full statutory audit (Kreston Reeves)

Full statutory audit (Kreston Reeves)

Full statutory audit (Kreston Reeves)

Full statutory audit (Kreston Reeves)

Full statutory audit (BDO)

Full statutory audit (BDO)

Full statutory audit (BDO)

Full statutory audit (BDO)

Limited assurance (Kreston Reeves)

Bisichi PLC

4747

Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, 
in our professional judgment, were of 
most significance in our audit of the 
financial statements of the current period 
and include the most significant assessed 

risks of material misstatement (whether 
or not due to fraud) that we identified, 
including those which had the greatest 
effect on: the overall audit strategy, the 
allocation of resources in the audit; and 
directing the efforts of the engagement 
team. These matters were addressed in 

the context of our audit of the financial 
statements as a whole, and in forming our 
opinion thereon, and we do not provide a 
separate opinion on these matters. This is 
not a complete list of all risks identified by 
our audit.

Revenue recognition: £50,519,592

Significance and nature of key risk
Revenue is a key performance indicator for users in 
assessing the group’s financial statements. Revenue 
generated has a significant impact on cash inflows and 
profit before tax for the group. As such revenue is a 
key determinant in profitability and the group’s ability to 
generate cash.

Revenue comprises two key revenue streams: the sale of 
coal and property rental income.

Coal revenue is recognised when the customer has a legally 
binding obligation to settle under the terms of the contract.

Rental income is recognised in the Group income statement 
on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

How our audit addressed the key risk
Sales of coal and coal processing services in the period were 
tested from the trigger point of the sale to the point of recognition 
in the financial statements, corroborating this to contract sales or 
service terms and the recognition stages detailed in IFRS 15.

Rental income revenue was recalculated based on the terms 
included in signed lease agreements. Again, the recognition 
stages detailed the relevant standards were carefully considered 
to ensure revenue recognised was in line with these. This 
substantive testing covered 100% of total property rental 
revenues.

Revenue streams were further analytically reviewed via 
comparison to our expectations. Expectations were based on 
a combination of prior financial data/budgets and our own 
assessments based on our knowledge gained of the business.

Cut-off of revenue was reviewed by analysing sales recorded 
during the period just before and after the financial year end and 
determining if the recognition applied was appropriate. 

Walkthrough testing was performed to ensure that key systems 
and controls in place around the revenue cycle operated as 
designed.

The accuracy of revenue disclosures in the accounts were 
confirmed to be consistent with the revenue cycle observed and 
audited. The completeness of these disclosures was confirmed by 
reference to the full disclosure requirements as detailed in IFRS 
15.

Key observations communicated to the Risk and Audit Committee
We have no concerns over the material accuracy of revenue recognised in the financial statements.

48 Bisichi PLC

Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

Valuation/impairment of investment properties: £10,700,134

Significance and nature of key risk
Investment properties comprise freehold and long leasehold 
land and buildings. Investment properties are carried at fair 
value in accordance with IAS 40.

How our audit addressed the key risk
Appropriate classification of investment properties under IAS 40 
was considered, especially in relation to long leasehold land and 
buildings.

Investment properties are revalued annually by professional 
external surveyors and included in the balance sheet at their 
fair value.  Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair 
values of assets are recognised in the consolidated income 
statement in the period to which they relate.  In accordance 
with IAS 40, investment properties are not depreciated. 

The fair value of the head leases is the net present value of 
the current head rent payable on leasehold properties until 
the expiry of the lease.

External valuation reports were obtained and vouched to stated 
fair values. The competence and independence of the valuation 
experts was carefully considered to ensure that the reports they 
produce can be relied upon. 

The key assumptions made within these reports were reviewed 
and considered for reasonableness, including rental yield 
analysis. We have further performed our own separate impairment 
considerations to consider if events/factors in place at year end 
present material impairment indicators.

Key observations communicated to the Risk and Audit Committee
We have no concerns over the material accuracy of investment property values recognised in the financial statements.

Valuation/impairment of mining reserves and development: £8,896,000

Significance and nature of key risk
The purpose of mine development is to establish secure 
working conditions and infrastructure to allow the safe and 
efficient extraction of recoverable reserves.

How our audit addressed the key risk
The accounting requirements of IFRS 6 and IAS 16 were 
considered to ensure capitalisation of costs to mine development 
under IAS 16 was appropriate.

Depreciation on mine development costs is not charged 
until production commences or the assets are put to 
use. On commencement of full commercial production, 
depreciation is charged over the life of the associated mine 
reserves extractable using the asset on a unit of production 
basis. 

The unit of production calculation is based on tonnes 
mined as a ratio to proven and probable reserves 
and also includes future forecast capital expenditure.  
The cost recognised includes the recognition of any 
decommissioning assets related to mine development.

In considering impairment indicators, as governed by IAS 36, 
the life of mine assessment was obtained. All significant input 
variables were considered and stress-tested to assess headroom 
between modelling and the value of mine development.

Consideration was given to the competence and independence of 
the technical expert involved with the production of historic technical 
reports on which the life of mine assessment is partially built. 

Depreciation of mine development was recalculated based on 
the unit of production basis to ensure accurately recorded. This 
basis was also considered for reasonableness by reference to the 
accounting policies of industry peers.

The accuracy and appropriateness of mine development 
disclosures in the accounts were confirmed to be consistent with 
the mine development accounting cycle observed and audited.

Key observations communicated to the Risk and Audit Committee
We have no concerns over the material accuracy of mining reserves and development values recognised in the financial 
statements.

Bisichi PLC

4949

Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

Other information
The other information comprises the 
information included in the annual report 
other than the financial statements and 
our auditor’s report thereon. The directors 
are responsible for the other information 
contained within the annual report. Our 
opinion on the financial statements does 
not cover the other information and, except 
to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in 
our report, we do not express any form of 
assurance conclusion thereon. Our 
responsibility is to read the other information 
and, in doing so, consider whether the 
other information is materially inconsistent 
with the financial statements or our 
knowledge obtained in the course of the 
audit, or otherwise appears to be materially 
misstated. If we identify such material 
inconsistencies or apparent material 
misstatements, we are required to 
determine whether this gives rise to a 
material misstatement in the financial 
statements themselves. If, based on the 
work we have performed, we conclude 
that there is a material misstatement of 
this other information, we are required to 
report that fact. We have nothing to report 
in this regard.

Our opinion on the 
remuneration report 
Kreston Reeves has audited the Annual 
remuneration report set out on pages 32 
to 39 of the Annual Report for the year 
ended 31 December 2021. The directors 
of the Company are responsible for the 
preparation and presentation of the 
Remuneration Report in accordance with 
the Companies Act 2006. Kreston Reeves’ 
responsibility is to express an opinion on 
the Remuneration Report, based on our 
audit conducted in accordance with 
International Accounting Standards. In 
Kreston Reeves’ opinion, the Remuneration 
Report of the Group for the year, complies 
with the requirements of the Companies 
Act 2006.

50 Bisichi PLC

Our consideration of climate 
change related risks
The financial impacts on the Group of 
climate change and the transition to a low 
carbon economy (“climate change”) were 
considered in our audit where they have 
the potential to directly or indirectly 
impact key judgements and estimates 
within the financial statements. 

The Group continues to develop its 
assessment of the potential impacts of 
climate change. Climate risks have the 
potential to materially impact the key 
judgements and estimates within the 
financial report. Our audit considered 
those risks that could be material to the 
key judgement and estimates in the 
assessment of the carrying value of 
non-current assets and closure and 
rehabilitation provisions. 

The key judgements and estimates 
included in the financial statements 
incorporate actions and strategies, to the 
extent they have been approved and can 
be reliably estimated in accordance with 
the Group’s accounting policies. 
Accordingly, our key audit matters 
address how we have assessed the 
Group’s climate related assumptions to 
the extent they impact each key audit 
matter. Our audit procedures were 
performed with the involvement of our 
climate change and valuation specialists.

Opinions on other matters 
prescribed by the Companies 
Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work 
undertaken in the course of the audit:
••   the information given in the strategic 

report and the directors’ report for the 
financial year for which the financial 
statements are prepared is consistent 
with the financial statements; and
••   the strategic report and the directors’ 

report have been prepared in accordance 
with applicable legal requirements.

Matters on which we are 
required to report by exception
In the light of our knowledge and 
understanding of the Group and parent 
company and its environment obtained in 
the course of the audit, we have not 
identified material misstatements in the 
strategic report or the directors’ report.

We have nothing to report in respect of 
the following matters in relation to which 
the Companies Act 2006 requires us to 
report to you if, in our opinion:
••   adequate accounting records have not 
been kept by the parent company, or 
returns adequate for our audit have not 
been received from branches not 
visited by us; or

••   the parent company financial 

statements are not in agreement with 
the accounting records and returns; or

••   certain disclosures of directors’ 

remuneration specified by law are not 
made; or

••   we have not received all the information 
and explanations we require for our audit

Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the directors’ 
responsibilities statement (set out on 
page 43), the directors are responsible 
for the preparation of the financial 
statements and for being satisfied that 
they give a true and fair view, and for 
such internal control as the directors 
determine is necessary to enable the 
preparation of financial statements that 
are free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error. 

In preparing the financial statements, the 
directors are responsible for assessing 
the Group’s and parent company’s ability 
to continue as a going concern, 
disclosing, as applicable, matters related 
to going concern and using the going 
concern basis of accounting unless the 
directors either intend to liquidate the 
Group or parent company or to cease 

Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

operations, or have no realistic alternative 
but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for 
the audit of the financial 
statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable 
assurance about whether the financial 
statements as a whole are free from 
material misstatement, whether due to 
fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s 
report that includes our opinion. 
Reasonable assurance is a high level of 
assurance but is not a guarantee that an 
audit conducted in accordance with ISAs 
(UK) will always detect a material 
misstatement when it exists. 
Misstatements can arise from fraud or 
error and are considered material if, 
individually or in the aggregate, they 
could reasonably be expected to 
influence the economic decisions of users 
taken on the basis of these financial 
statements. 

Capability of the audit in detecting 
irregularities, including fraud

Based on our understanding of the group 
and industry, and through discussion with 
the directors and other management (as 
required by auditing standards), we 
identified that the principal risks of 
non-compliance with laws and regulations 
related to health and safety, anti-bribery 
and employment law. We considered the 
extent to which non-compliance might 
have a material effect on the financial 
statements. We also considered those 
laws and regulations that have a direct 
impact on the preparation of the financial 
statements such as the Companies Act 
2006. We communicated identified laws 
and regulations throughout our team and 
remained alert to any indications of 
non-compliance throughout the audit. We 
evaluated management’s incentives and 
opportunities for fraudulent manipulation 
of the financial statements (including the 
risk of override of controls), and 

determined that the principal risks were 
related to posting inappropriate journal 
entries to increase revenue or reduce 
expenditure, management bias in 
accounting estimates and judgemental 
areas of the financial statements such as 
the valuation of investment properties 
and mining reserve and development 
asset. Audit procedures performed by the 
group engagement team and component 
auditors included:
••   We obtained an understanding of the 
legal and regulatory frameworks that 
are applicable to the Group and 
determined that the most significant 
are those that relate to the reporting 
framework and the relevant tax 
compliance regulations in the 
jurisdictions in which Bisichi PLC 
operates. In addition, we concluded 
that there are certain significant laws 
and regulations that may have an effect 
on the determination of the amounts 
and disclosures in the financial 
statements, mainly relating to health 
and safety, employee matters, bribery 
and corruption practices, environmental 
and certain aspects of company 
legislation recognising the regulated 
nature of the Group’s mining and oil 
and gas activities and its legal form.
••   Detailed discussions were held with 

management to identify any known or 
suspected instances of non- 
compliance with laws and regulations.
••   Identifying and assessing the design 

effectiveness of controls that 
management has in place to prevent 
and detect fraud.

••   Challenging assumptions and 

judgements made by management in 
its significant accounting estimates, 
including assessing the capabilities of 
the property valuers and discussing 
with the valuers how their valuations 
were calculated and the data and 
assumptions they have used to 
calculate these.

••   Performing analytical procedures to 
identify any unusual or unexpected 
relationships, including related party 
transactions, that may indicate risks of 
material misstatement due to fraud.
••   Confirmation of related parties with 

management, and review of 
transactions throughout the period to 
identify any previously undisclosed 
transactions with related parties 
outside the normal course of business.
••   Reading minutes of meetings of those 
charged with governance, reviewing 
internal audit reports and reviewing 
correspondence with relevant tax and 
regulatory authorities.

••   Review of significant and unusual 
transactions and evaluation of the 
underlying financial rationale 
supporting the transactions.

••   Identifying and testing journal entries, 
in particular any manual entries made 
at the year end for financial statement 
preparation.

••   We ensured our global audit team 

(including Kreston Reeves and BDO) 
has deep industry experience through 
working for many years on relevant 
audits, including experience of mining 
and investment property management. 
Our audit planning included considering 
external market factors, for example 
geopolitical risk, the potential impact of 
climate change, commodity price risk 
and major trends in the industry.

Because of the inherent limitations of an 
audit, there is a risk that we will not detect 
all irregularities, including those leading 
to a material misstatement in the financial 
statements or non-compliance with 
regulation. This risk increases the more 
that compliance with a law or regulation is 
removed from the events and 
transactions reflected in the financial 
statements, as we will be less likely to 
become aware of instances of non-
compliance.

Bisichi PLC

5151

Governance Independent auditor report to the shareholders of Bisichi Plc

Use of our report
This report is made solely to the 
company’s members, as a body, in 
accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of 
the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work 
has been undertaken so that we might 
state to the company’s members those 
matters we are required to state to them 
in an auditor report and for no other 
purpose. To the fullest extent permitted 
by law, we do not accept or assume 
responsibility to anyone other than the 
company and the company’s members as 
a body, for our audit work, for this report, 
or for the opinions we have formed.

Anne Dwyer BSc(Hons) FCA (Senior 
Statutory Auditor) 

For and on behalf of 

Kreston Reeves LLP 

Chartered Accountants 
Statutory Auditor 
London

Date: 19 April 2022

As part of an audit in accordance with 
ISAs (UK), we exercise professional 
judgment and maintain professional 
scepticism throughout the audit. We also:

report. However, future events or 
conditions may cause the Group or the 
parent company to cease to continue 
as a going concern.

••   Identify and assess the risks of material 

••   Evaluate the overall presentation, 

misstatement of the financial 
statements, whether due to fraud or 
error, design and perform audit 
procedures responsive to those risks, 
and obtain audit evidence that is 
sufficient and appropriate to provide a 
basis for our opinion. The risk of not 
detecting a material misstatement 
resulting from fraud is higher than for 
one resulting from error, as fraud may 
involve collusion, forgery, intentional 
omissions, misrepresentations, or the 
override of internal control.

••   Obtain an understanding of internal 

control relevant to the audit in order to 
design audit procedures that are 
appropriate in the circumstances, but 
not for the purpose of expressing an 
opinion on the effectiveness of the 
Group’s internal control.

••   Evaluate the appropriateness of 
accounting policies used and the 
reasonableness of accounting 
estimates and related disclosures made 
by the directors.

••   Conclude on the appropriateness of the 

directors’ use of the going concern 
basis of accounting and, based on the 
audit evidence obtained, whether a 
material uncertainty exists related to 
events or conditions that may cast 
significant doubt on the Group’s or the 
parent company’s ability to continue as 
a going concern. If we conclude that a 
material uncertainty exists, we are 
required to draw attention in our 
auditor’s report to the related 
disclosures in the financial statements 
or, if such disclosures are inadequate, 
to modify our opinion. Our conclusions 
are based on the audit evidence 
obtained up to the date of our auditor’s 

structure and content of the financial 
statements, including the disclosures, 
and whether the financial statements 
represent the underlying transactions 
and events in a manner that achieves 
fair presentation.

••   Obtain sufficient appropriate audit 
evidence regarding the financial 
information of the entities or business 
activities within the Group to express 
an opinion on the consolidated financial 
statements. We are responsible for the 
direction, supervision and performance 
of the Group audit. We remain solely 
responsible for our audit opinion.

We communicate with those charged 
with governance regarding, among other 
matters, the planned scope and timing of 
the audit and significant audit findings, 
including any significant deficiencies in 
internal control that we identify during 
our audit.

Other matters which we are 
required to address
We were appointed by the audit committee 
on 19 November 2021 to audit the financial 
statements for the year ending 31 
December 2021. Our total uninterrupted 
period of engagement is 1 year, covering 
the year ended 31 December 2021. The 
non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s 
Ethical Standard were not provided to the 
group or the parent company and we 
remain independent of the group and the 
parent company in conducting our audit. 
During the period under review, agreed 
upon procedures were completed in 
respect of a number of the group’s service 
charge accounts. Our audit opinion is 
consistent with the additional report to the 
audit committee.

52 Bisichi PLC

 
Financial statements

54  Consolidated income statement

55	 Consolidated	statement	of other	comprehensive income

56	 Consolidated	balance	sheet

58	 Consolidated	statement	of	changes	in shareholders’	equity

59	 Consolidated	cash	flow	statement

60	 Group	accounting	policies

68	 Notes	to	the	financial	statements

94	 Company	balance	sheet

95	 Company	statement	of	changes	in	equity

96	 Company	accounting	policies

Bisichi	PLC

53

 
Financial statements

Financial statements
Consolidated income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2021

Group revenue
Operating	costs

Operating	profit/(loss)	before	
depreciation,	fair	value	adjustments	
and	exchange	movements
Depreciation

Operating	profit/(loss)	before	fair	value	
adjustments	and	exchange	movements

Exchange	(losses)/gains

Increase/(Decrease)	in	value	of	
investment	properties
Gain	on	investments	held	at	fair	value

Operating profit/(loss)
Share	of	loss	in	joint	ventures

Profit/(Loss) before interest and 
taxation
Interest	receivable
Interest	payable

 Profit/(Loss) before tax
Taxation

 Profit/(Loss) for the year

Attributable to:
Equity	holders	of	the	company
Non-controlling	interest

Profit/(Loss) for the year
Profit/(Loss)	per	share	–	basic

Profit/(Loss)	per	share	–	diluted

Notes

2
3

3

1

4

1
13

7

5
8

27

10

10

2021
Revaluations 
and  
impairment
£’000

-
-

-

-

-

-

255

812

1,067
(125)

942

-
-

942
(342)

600

600
-

600

2021
Trading
£’000

50,520
(45,492)

5,028

(2,571)

2,457

(121)

-

-

2,336
-

2,336

22
(799)

1,559
(453)

1,106

891
215

1,106

2021
Total
£’000

50,520
(45,492)

5,028

2020
Trading
£’000

29,805
(30,916)

(1,111)

(2,571)

2,457

(2,193)

(3,304)

39

-

-

(3,265)
-

(3,265)

25
(641)

(3,881)
1,225

(2,656)

(2,216)
(440)

(2,656)

(121)

255

812

3,403
(125)

3,278

22
(799)

2,501
(795)

1,706

1,491
215

1,706

13.96p

13.94p

2020
Revaluations	
and  

impairment
£’000

-
-

-

-

-

-

2020
Total
£’000

29,805
(30,916)

(1,111)

(2,193)

(3,304)

39

(1,295)

(1,295)

67

(1,228)
(87)

(1,315)

-
-

(1,315)
177

(1,138)

(1,138)
-

(1,138)

67

(4,493)
(87)

(4,580)

25
(641)

(5,196)
1,402

(3,794)

(3,354)
(440)

(3,794)

(31.42p)

(31.42p)

Trading	gains	and	losses	reflect	all	the	trading	activity	on	mining	and	property	operations	and	realised	gains.	Revaluation	gains	 
and	losses	reflects	the	revaluation	of	investment	properties	and	other	assets	within	the	Group	and	any	proportion	of	unrealised	
gains	and	losses	within	Joint	Ventures.	The	total	column	represents	the	consolidated	income	statement	presented	in	accordance	
with	IAS	1.	

54 Bisichi	PLC

 
Financial statements
Consolidated statement of other 
comprehensive income
for the year ended 31 December 2021

Profit/(Loss) for the year

Other comprehensive income/(expense):

Items that may be subsequently recycled to the income statement:
Exchange	differences	on	translation	of	foreign	operations

Other comprehensive income for the year net of tax

Total comprehensive income for the year net of tax

Attributable to: 
Equity	shareholders
Non-controlling	interest

2021
£’000

1,706

(60)

(60)

1,646

1,439
207

1,646

2020
£’000

(3,794)

(467)

(467)

(4,261)

(3,752)
(509)

(4,261)

Bisichi	PLC 55

Financial statements
Consolidated balance sheet
at 31 December 2021

Assets

Non-current assets
Investment	properties

Mining	reserves,	plant	and	equipment

Investments	in	joint	ventures	accounted	for	using	equity	method
Other	investments	at	fair	value	through	profit	and	loss	(“FVPL”)	

Total non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories

Trade	and	other	receivables

Investments	in	listed	securities	held	at	FVPL
Cash	and	cash	equivalents

Total current assets

Total assets

Liabilities

Current liabilities
	 Borrowings

	 Trade	and	other	payables
	 Current	tax	liabilities

Total current liabilities

Non-current liabilities
	 Borrowings

	 Provision	for	rehabilitation

					Lease	liabilities
	 Deferred	tax	liabilities

Total non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

56 Bisichi	PLC

Notes

2021
£’000

2020
£’000

11

12

13
13

16

17

18

20

19

20

21

31
23

10,700

9,065

1,130
3,631

24,526

1,253

8,626

685
3,018

13,582

38,108

(2,666)

(10,743)
(726)

(14,135)

(3,853)

(1,390)

(389)
(506)

(6,138)

(20,273)

17,835

10,471

10,174

1,255
1,746

23,646

3,445

6,958

833
3,768

15,004

38,650

(5,110)

(10,856)
(209)

(16,175)

(3,943)

(1,442)

(427)
(474)

(6,286)

(22,461)

16,189

Financial statements Consolidated balance sheet

Equity
	 Share	capital

	 Share	premium	account

	 Translation	reserve

	 Other	reserves
	 Retained	earnings

Total equity attributable to equity shareholders
Non-controlling	interest

Total equity 

Notes

24

25

27

2021
£’000

1,068

258

2020
£’000

1,068

258

(2,540)

(2,488)

707
18,019

17,512

323

17,835

707
16,528

16,073

116

16,189

These	financial	statements	were	approved	and	authorised	for	issue	by	the	board	of	directors	on	13	April	2022	and	signed	on	its	
behalf	by:

A R Heller 
Director	

G J Casey 
Director

Company Registration No. 112155 

Bisichi	PLC

5757

 
 
	
Financial statements
Consolidated statement of changes 
in shareholders’ equity
for the year ended 31 December 2021

Balance at 1 January 2020

Loss	for	the	year
Other	comprehensive	expense

Total	comprehensive	expense	
for	the	year
Dividend	(note	9)

Share
capital
£’000

1,068

-
-

-

-

Share
Premium
£’000

Transla-
tion
reserves
£’000

Other
reserves
£’000

Retained
earnings
£’000

Total
£’000

258

(2,090)

707

19,989

19,932

Non-
controlling 
interest
£’000
625

-
-

-

-

-
(398)

(398)

-

-
-

-

-

(3,354)
-

(3,354)

(3,354)
(398)

(3,752)

(107)

(107)

Balance at 1 January 2021

1,068

258

(2,488)

707

16,528

16,073

Profit	for	the	year
Other	comprehensive	income

Total	comprehensive	income	for	
the	year
Dividend	(note	9)

-
-

-

-

-
-

-

-

-
(52)

(52)

-

-
-

-

-

1,491
-

1,491

1,491
(52)

1,439

-

-

Balance at 31 December 2021

1,068

258

(2,540)

707

18,019

17,512

58 Bisichi	PLC

Total
equity
£’000

20,557

(3,794)
(467)

(4,261)

(107)

16,189

1,706
(60)

1,646

-

17,835

(440)
(69)

(509)

-

116

215
(8)

207

-

323

Financial statements
Consolidated cash flow statement
for the year ended 31 December 2021

Cash flows from operating activities 
Operating	profit/Loss	
Adjustments	for:
	 Depreciation
	 Unrealised	(gain)/loss	on	investment	properties
	 Gain	on	investments	held	at	FVPL
	 Exchange	adjustments
Cash flow before working capital
Change	in	inventories
Change	in	trade	and	other	receivables
Change	in	trade	and	other	payables
Cash generated from operations
Interest	received
Interest	paid
Income	tax	paid
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition	of	reserves,	property,	motor	vehicles,	plant	and	equipment
Investment	in	joint	venture
Disposal	of	other	investments
Acquisition	of	other	investments
Cash flow from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings	drawn
Borrowings	and	lease	liabilities	repaid
Equity	dividends	paid
Minority	dividends	paid
Cash flow from financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash	and	cash	equivalents	at	1	January
Exchange	adjustment
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December
Cash	and	cash	equivalents	at	31	December	comprise:
	 Cash	and	cash	equivalents	as	presented	in	the	balance	sheet
	 Bank	overdrafts	(secured)

Year ended
31 December
2021
£’000

Year	ended
31	December
2020
£’000

3,403

(4,493)

2,571
(255)
(812)
121
5,028
2,105
(1,900)
192
5,425
22
(799)
(216)
4,432

(1,781)
-
705
(1,630)
(2,706)

46
(317)
-
-
(271)
1,455
(1,078)
105
482

3,018
(2,536)
482

2,193
1,295
(67)
(39)
(1,111)
(1,127)
122
3,379
1,263
25
(641)
(198)
449

(3,186)
-
253
(1,359)
(4,292)

61
(239)
(107)
-
(285)
(4,128)
2,878
172
(1,078)

3,768
(4,846)
(1,078)

Bisichi	PLC

5959

Financial statements
Group accounting policies
for the year ended 31 December 2021

Basis of accounting 
The	results	for	the	year	ended	31	
December	2021	have	been	prepared	in	
accordance	with	UK-adopted	
international	accounting	standards	in	
conformity	with	the	requirements	of	the	
Companies	Act	2006.	In	applying	the	
Group’s	accounting	policies	and	
assessing	areas	of	judgment	and	
estimation	materiality	is	applied	as	

detailed	on	page	40	of the	Audit	
Committee	Report.	The	principal	
accounting	policies	are	described	below:

The	Group	financial	statements	are	
presented	in £	sterling	and	all	values	are	
rounded	to	the	nearest	thousand	pounds	
(£000)	except	when	otherwise	stated.	

The	functional	currency	for	each	entity	in	
the	Group,	and	for	joint	arrangements	

and	associates,	is	the	currency	of	the	
country	in	which	the	entity	has	been	
incorporated.	Details	of	which	country	
each	entity	has	been	incorporated	can	be	
found	in	Note	15	for	subsidiaries	and	Note	
14	for	joint	arrangements	and	associates.	

The	exchange	rates	used	in	the	accounts	
were	as	follows:

Year-end	rate
Annual	average

£1 Sterling: Rand
2021

2020 

£1 Sterling: Dollar
2021 

2020 

20.7672
20.4060

20.0145
21.0936

1.3706
1.3685

1.3663
1.2833

Going concern
The	Group	has	prepared	cash	flow	
forecasts	which	demonstrate	that	the	
Group	has	sufficient	resources	to	meet	
its	liabilities	as	they	fall	due	for	at	least	
the	next	12	months	from	date	of	signing.	

In	South	Africa,	a	structured	trade	finance	
facility	with	Absa	Bank	Limited	for	
R85million	is	held	by	Sisonke	Coal	
Processing	(Pty)	Limited,	a	100%	
subsidiary	of	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	
Limited.	This	facility	comprises	of	a	
R85million	revolving	facility	to	cover	the	
working	capital	requirements	of	the	
Group’s	South	African	operations.	The	
facility	is	renewable	annually	at	25	
January	and	is	secured	against	inventory,	
debtors	and	cash	that	are	held	in	the	
Group’s	South	African	operations.	The	
Directors	do	not	foresee	any	reason	why	
the	facility	will	not	continue	to	be	renewed	
at	the	next	renewal	date,	in	line	with	prior	
periods	and	based	on	their	banking	
relationships.	

The	directors	expect	that	the	coal	market	
conditions	experienced	by	its	South	
African	coal	mining	and	processing	
operations	in	2021	will	be	similar	going	
into	2022.	The	directors	therefore	have	a	
reasonable	expectation	that	the	mine	will	
achieve	positive	levels	of	cash	generation	
for	the	Group	in	2022.	As	a	
consequence,	the	directors	believe	that	
the	Group	is	well	placed	to	manage	its	
South	African	business	risks	successfully.	

In	the	UK,	forecasts	demonstrate	that	the	
Group	has	sufficient	resources	to	meet	
its	liabilities	as	they	fall	due	for	at	least	
the	next	12	months,	from	the	approval	of	
the	financial	statements,	including	those	
related	to	the	Group’s	UK	Loan	facility	
outlined	below.	

The	Group	holds	a	5	year	term	facility	of	
£3.9m	with	Julian	Hodge	Bank	Limited	at	
an	initial	LTV	of	40%.	The	loan	is	secured	
against	the	company’s	UK	retail	property	
portfolio.	The	amount	repayable	on	the	
loan	at	year	end	was	£3.9million.	The	

debt	package	has	a	five	year	term	and	is	
repayable	at	the	end	of	the	term	in	
December	2024.	In	the	last	quarter	of	
2021	the	base	interest	rate	on	the	loan	
changed	from	LIBOR	to	the	Bank	of	
England	base	rate.	The	overall	interest	
cost	of	the	loan	is	4.00%	above	the	Bank	
of	England	base	rate.	All	covenants	on	
the	loan	were	met	during	the	year	and	the	
directors	have	a	reasonable	expectation	
that	the	Group	has	adequate	financial	
resources	at	short	notice,	including	cash	
and	listed	equity	investments,	to	ensure	
the	existing	facility’s	covenants	are	met	
on	an	ongoing	basis.	

Dragon	Retail	Properties	Limited	
(“Dragon”),	the	Group’s	50%	owned	joint	
venture,	holds	a	Santander	bank	loan	of	
£1.2million	secured	against	its	investment	
property,	see	note	14.	The	bank	loan	of	
£1.164million	is	secured	by	way	of	a	first	
charge	on	specific	freehold	property	at	a	
value	of	£2.08	million.	

60 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Group accounting policies

The	interest	cost	of	the	loan	is	2.75	per	
cent	above	the	bank’s	base	rate.	A	
refinancing	of	this	loan	is	currently	
underway.	The	loan	originally	expired	in	
October	2020	but	has	been	extended	to	
April	2022,	and	the	lender	has	offered	to	
extend	this	further	if	required.	Dragon	has	
agreed	terms	with	a	new	lender	to	
refinance	this	loan	in	full	and	are	
expecting	to	complete	this	shortly.

Subsequent	to	year	end	in	the	first	
quarter	of	2022	geo-political	events	in	
Ukraine	resulted	in	higher	global	energy	
prices.	Although	the	final	outcome	of	the	
events	in	Ukraine	is	uncertain,	the	
Directors	at	present	do	not	foresee	the	
events	having	a	significant	negative	
impact	on	the	Group’s	UK	and	South	
African	operations	ability	to	remain	in	
operation	for	the	foreseeable	future.	

As	a	result	of	the	banking	facilities	held	
as	well	as	the	acceptable	levels	of	cash	
expected	to	be	held	by	the	Group	over	
the	next	12	months,	the	Directors	believe	
that	the	Group	has	adequate	resources	
to	continue	in	operational	existence	for	
the	foreseeable	future	and	that	the	Group	
is	well	placed	to	manage	its	business	
risks.	Thus	they	continue	to	adopt	the	
going	concern	basis	of	accounting	in	
preparing	the	annual	financial	
statements.

International Financial Reporting 
Standards (IFRS)
The	Group	has	adopted	all	of	the	new	
and	revised	Standards	and	Interpretations	
issued	by	the	International	Accounting	
Standards	Board	(“IASB”)	that	are	
relevant	to	its	operations	and	effective	for	
accounting	periods	beginning	1	January	
2021. 

A	number	of	new	standards,	amendments	
to	standards	and	interpretations	have	
been	issued	but	are	not	yet	effective	for	
the	Group.	The	Group	has	not	adopted	
any	Standards	or Interpretations	in	
advance	of	the	required	implementation	
dates.	The	application	of	these	new	
standards,	amendments	and	
interpretations	are	not	expected	to	have	a	
significant	impact	on	the	Group’s	income	
statement	or	balance	sheet.

We	are	committed	to	improving	disclosure	
and	transparency	and	will	continue	to	work	
with	our	different	stakeholders	to	ensure	
they	understand	the	detail	of	these	
accounting	changes.	We	continue	to	remain	
committed	to	a	robust	financial	policy.

Key judgements and estimates
Areas	where	key	estimates	and	judgements	
are	considered	to	have	a	significant	effect	
on	the	amounts	recognised	in	the	financial	
statements	include:	

Life of mine and reserves
The	directors	consider	their	judgements	
and	estimates	surrounding	the	life	of	the	
mine	and	its	reserves	to	have	significant	
effect	on	the	amounts	recognised	in	the	
financial	statements	and	to	be	an	area	
where	the	financial	statements	are	
subject	to	significant	estimation	
uncertainty.	The	life	of	mine	remaining	is	
currently	estimated	at	8	years.	This	life	of	
mine	is	based	on	the	Group’s	existing	
coal	reserves	including	reserves	acquired	
but	subject	to	regulatory	approval.	The	
Group	actively	seeks	new	opportunities	
to	extend	the	life	of	mine	of	its	existing	
mining	operations	or	develop	new	
independent	mining	operations	in	South	
Africa.	The	life	of	mine	excludes	future	coal	
purchases	and	coal	reserve	acquisitions.	

The	Group’s	estimates	of	proven	and	
probable	reserves	are	prepared	utilising	
the	South	African code for	the	reporting	
of	exploration	results,	mineral	resources	
and	mineral	reserves	(the SAMREC	code)	
and	are	subject	to	assessment	by	an	
independent	Competent	Person	
experienced	in	the	field	of	coal	geology	
and	specifically	opencast	and	pillar	coal	
extraction.	Estimates	of	coal	reserves	
impact	assessments	of	the	carrying	value	
of	property,	plant	and	equipment,	
depreciation	calculations	and	
rehabilitation	and	decommissioning	
provisions.	There	are	numerous	
uncertainties	inherent	in	estimating	coal	
reserves	and	changes	to	these	
assumptions	may	result	in	restatement	of	
reserves.	These	assumptions	include	
geotechnical	factors	as	well	as	economic	
factors	such	as	commodity	prices,	
production	costs	and	yield.

Depreciation, amortisation of mineral 
rights, mining development costs and 
plant & equipment
The	annual	depreciation/amortisation	
charge	is	dependent	on	estimates,	
including	coal	reserves	and	the	related	
life	of	mine,	expected	development	
expenditure	for	probable	reserves,	the	
allocation	of	certain	assets	to	relevant	ore	
reserves	and	estimates	of	residual	values	
of	the	processing	plant.	The	charge	can	
fluctuate	when	there	are	significant	
changes	in	any	of	the	factors	or	
assumptions	used,	such	as	estimating	
mineral	reserves	which	in	turn	affects	the	
life	of	mine	or	the	expected	life	of	
reserves.	Estimates	of	proven	and	
probable	reserves	are	prepared	by	an	
independent	Competent	Person.	
Assessments	of	depreciation/
amortisation	rates	against	the	estimated	
reserve	base	are	performed	regularly.	
Details	of	the	depreciation/amortisation	
charge	can	be	found	in	note	12.

Bisichi	PLC

6161

Financial statements Group accounting policies

Provision for mining rehabilitation 
including restoration and  
de-commissioning costs 
A	provision	for	future	rehabilitation	
including	restoration	and	
decommissioning	costs	requires	
estimates	and	assumptions	to	be	made	
around	the	relevant	regulatory	
framework,	the	timing,	extent	and	costs	
of	the	rehabilitation	activities	and	of	the	
risk	free	rates	used	to	determine	the	
present	value	of	the	future	cash	outflows.	
The	provisions,	including	the	estimates	
and	assumptions	contained	therein,	are	
reviewed	regularly	by	management.	The	
Group	annually	engages	an	independent	
expert	to	assess	the	cost	of	restoration	
and	final	decommissioning	as	part	of	
management’s	assessment	of	the	provision.	
Details	of	the	provision	for	mining	
rehabilitation	can	be	found	in	note	21.	

Impairment 
Property,	plant	and	equipment	
representing	the	Group’s	mining	assets	in	
South	Africa	are	reviewed	for	impairment	
when	there	are	indicators	of	impairment.	
The	impairment	test	is	performed	using	
the	approved	Life	of	Mine	plan	and	those	
future	cash	flow	estimates	are	discounted	
using	asset	specific	discount	rates	and	
are	based	on	expectations	about	future	
operations.	The	impairment	test	requires	
estimates	about	production	and	sales	
volumes,	commodity	prices,	proven	and	
probable	reserves	(as	assessed	by	the	
Competent	Person),	operating	costs	and	
capital	expenditures	necessary	to	extract	
reserves	in	the	approved	Life	of	Mine	
plan.	Changes	in	such	estimates	could	
impact	recoverable	values	of	these	
assets.	Details	of	the	carrying	value	of	
property,	plant	and	equipment	can	be	
found	in	note	12.	

The	impairment	test	indicated	significant	
headroom	as	at	31	December	2021	and	
therefore	no	impairment	is	considered	
appropriate.	The	key	assumptions	
include:	coal	prices,	including	domestic	
coal	prices	based	on	recent	pricing	and	
assessment	of	market	forecasts	for	
export	coal;	production	based	on	proven	
and	probable	reserves	assessed	by	the	
independent	Competent	Person	and	
yields	associated	with	mining	areas	
based	on	assessments	by	the	Competent	
Person	and	empirical	data.	An	10%	
reduction	in	average	forecast	coal	prices	
or	a	14%	reduction	in	yield	would	give	
rise	to	a	breakeven	scenario.	However,	
the	directors	consider	the	forecasted	
yield	levels	and	pricing	to	be	appropriate	
and	supportable	best	estimates.

Fair value measurements of 
investment properties 
An	assessment	of	the	fair	value	of	
investment	properties,	is	required	to	be	
performed.	In	such	instances,	fair	value	
measurements	are	estimated	based	on	
the	amounts	for	which	the	assets	and	
liabilities	could	be	exchanged	between	
market	participants.	To	the	extent	
possible,	the	assumptions	and	inputs	
used	take	into	account	externally	
verifiable	inputs.	However,	such	
information	is	by	nature	subject	to	
uncertainty.	The	fair	value	of	investment	
property	is	set	out	in	note	11,	whilst	the	
carrying	value	of	investments	in	joint	
ventures	which	themselves	include	
investment	property	held	at	fair	value	by	
the	joint	venture	is	set	out	at	note	13.	

Measurement of development property
The	development	property	included	
within	the	Group’s	joint	venture	
investment	in	West	Ealing	Projects	limited	
is	considered	by	Management	to	fall	
outside	the	scope	of	investment	property.	

A	property	intended	for	sale	in	the	
ordinary	course	of	business	or	in	the	
process	of	construction	or	development	
for	such	sale,	for	example,	property	
acquired	exclusively	with	a	view	to	
subsequent	disposal	in	the	near	future	or	
for	development	and	resale	is	expected	to	
be	recorded	under	the	accounting	standard	
of	IAS	2	Inventories.	The	directors	have	
discussed	the	commercial	approach	with	
the	directors	of	the	underlying	joint	
venture	and	the	current	plan	is	to	sell	or	
to	complete	the	development	and	sell.	
The	Directors	therefore	consider	the	key	
judgement	of	accounting	treatment	of	the	
property	development	under	IAS	2	
Inventories	to	be	correct.	

IAS	2	Inventories	require	the	capitalised	
costs	to	be	held	at	the	lower	of	cost	or	
net	realisable	value.	At	31	December	
2021,	the	costs	capitalised	within	the	
development	based	on	a	director’s	
appraisal	for	the	property	estimated	the	
net	realisable	value	at	a	surplus	over	the	
cost	for	the	development.	The	directors	
have	reviewed	the	underlying	inputs	and	
key	assumptions	made	in	the	appraisal	
and	consider	them	adequate.	However,	
such	information	is	by	nature	subject	to	
uncertainty.	The	cost	of	the	development	
property	is	set	out	in	note	14.	

Basis of consolidation
The	Group	accounts	incorporate	the	
accounts	of	Bisichi	PLC	and	all	of	its	
subsidiary	undertakings,	together	with	
the	Group’s	share	of	the	results	of	its	joint	
ventures.	Non-controlling	interests	in	
subsidiaries	are	presented	separately	
from	the	equity	attributable	to	equity	
owners	of	the	parent	company.	On	
acquisition	of	a	non-wholly	owned	
subsidiary,	the	non-controlling	
shareholders’	interests	are	initially	
measured	at	the	non-controlling	interests’	
proportionate	share	of	the	fair	value	of	
the	subsidiaries	net	assets.	

62 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Group accounting policies

Thereafter,	the	carrying	amount	of	
non-controlling	interests	is	the	amount	of	
those	interests	at	initial	recognition	plus	
the	non-controlling	interests’	share	of	
subsequent	changes	in	equity.	For	
subsequent	changes	in	ownership	in	a	
subsidiary	that	do	not	result	in	a	loss	of	
control,	the	consideration	paid	or	
received	is	recognised	entirely	in	equity.	

The	definition	of	control	assumes	the	
simultaneous	fulfilment	of	the	following	
three	criteria:

• 
• 

• 
• 

• 
• 

 	The	parent	company	holds	decision-
making	power	over	the	relevant	
activities	of	the	investee,

 	The	parent	company	has	rights	to	
variable	returns	from	the	investee,	and

 	The	parent	company	can	use	its	
decision-making	power	to	affect	the	
variable	returns.

Investees	are	analysed	for	their	relevant	
activities	and	variable	returns,	and	the	
link	between	the	variable	returns	and	the	
extent	to	which	their	relevant	activities	
could	be	influenced	in	order	to	ensure	the	
definition	is	correctly	applied.	

Revenue
The	Group’s	revenue	from	contracts	with	
customers,	as	defined	under	IFRS	15,	
includes	coal	revenue	and	service	charge	
income. 

Coal	revenue	is	derived	principally	from	
export	revenue	and	domestic	revenue.	

Both	export	revenue	and	domestic	
revenue	is	recognised	when	the	customer	
has	a	legally	binding	obligation	to	settle	
under	the	terms	of	the	contract	when	the	
performance	obligations	have	been	
satisfied,	which	is	once	control	of	the	
goods	has	transferred	to	the	buyer	at	the	
delivery	point.	For	export	revenue	this	is	
generally	recognised	when	the	product	is	
delivered	to	the	export	terminal	location	
specified	in	the	customer	contract,	at	

which	point	control	of	the	goods	have	
been	transferred	to	the	customer.	For	
domestic	coal	revenues	this	is	generally	
recognised	on	collection	by	the	customer	
from	the	mine	or	from	the	mine’s	rail	
siding	when	loaded	into	transport,	where	
the	customer	pays	the	transportation	
costs.	Fulfilment	costs	to	satisfy	the	
performance	obligations	of	coal	revenues	
such	as	transport	and	loading	costs	
borne	by	the	Group	from	the	mine	to	the	
delivery	point	are	recoded	in	operating	
costs.  

Coal	revenue	is	measured	based	on	
consideration	specified	in	the	contract	
with	a	customer	on	a	per	metric	tonne	
basis.	Both	export	and	domestic	
contracts	are	typically	on	a	specified	coal	
volume	basis	and	less	than	a	year	in	
duration.	Export	contracts	are	typically	
linked	to	the	price	of	Free	on	Board	(FOB)	
Coal	from	Richards	Bay	Coal	Terminal	
(API4	price).	Domestic	contracts	are	
typically	linked	to	a	contractual	price	
agreed.	

Service	charges	recoverable	from	tenants	
are	recognised	over	time	as	the	service	is	
rendered.	

Lease	property	rental	income,	as	defined	
under	IFRS	16,	is	recognised	in	the	Group	
income	statement	on	a	straight-line	basis	
over	the	term	of	the	lease.	This	includes	
the	effect	of	lease	incentives.

Expenditure
Expenditure	is	recognised	in	respect	of	
goods	and	services	received.	Where	coal	
is	purchased	from	third	parties	at	point	of	
extraction	the	expenditure	is	only	
recognised	when	the	coal	is	extracted	
and	all	of	the	significant	risks	and	
rewards	of	ownership	have	been	
transferred.

Investment properties 
Investment	properties	comprise	freehold	
and	long	leasehold	land	and	buildings.	
Investment	properties	are	carried	at	fair	
value	in	accordance	with	IAS	40	
‘Investment	Properties’.	Properties	are	
recognised	as	investment	properties	
when	held	for	long-term	rental	yields,	and	
after	consideration	has	been	given	to	a	
number	of	factors	including	length	of	
lease,	quality	of	tenant	and	covenant,	
value	of	lease,	management	intention	for	
future	use	of	property,	planning	consents	
and	percentage	of	property	leased.	
Investment	properties	are	revalued	
annually	by	professional	external	
surveyors	and	included	in	the	balance	
sheet	at	their	fair	value.	Gains	or	losses	
arising	from	changes	in	the	fair	values	of	
assets	are	recognised	in	the	consolidated	
income	statement	in	the	period	to	which	
they	relate.	In	accordance	with	IAS	40,	
investment	properties	are	not	
depreciated.	The	fair	value	of	the	head	
leases	is	the	net	present	value	of	the	
current	head	rent	payable	on	leasehold	
properties	until	the	expiry	of	the	lease.

Mining reserves, plant and 
equipment and development cost
The	cost	of	property,	plant	and	equipment	
comprises	its	purchase	price	and	any	
costs	directly	attributable	to	bringing	the	
asset	to	the	location	and	condition	
necessary	for	it	to	be	capable	of	
operating	in	accordance	with	agreed	
specifications.	Freehold	land	included	
within	mining	reserves	is	not	depreciated.	
Other	property,	plant	and	equipment	is	
stated	at	historical	cost	less	accumulated	
depreciation.	The	cost	recognised	
includes	the	recognition	of	any	
decommissioning	assets	related	to	
property,	plant	and	equipment.	

Bisichi	PLC

6363

 
 
 
Financial statements Group accounting policies

• 
• 

• 
• 

 	the	Group	can	identify	the	component	
of	the	ore	body	for	which	access	has	
been	improved;	and

  the	costs	relating	to	the	stripping	
activity	associated	with	that	component	
or	components	can	be	measured	
reliably.

In	determining	the	relevant	component	of	
the	coal	reserve	for	which	access	is	
improved,	the	Group	componentises	its	
mine	into	geographically	distinct	sections	
or	phases	to	which	the	stripping	activities	
being	undertaken	within	that	component	
are	allocated.	Such	phases	are	
determined	based	on	assessment	of	
factors	such	as	geology	and	mine	
planning.

The	Group	depreciates	deferred	costs	
capitalised	as	stripping	assets	on	a	unit	of	
production	method,	with	reference	the	
tons	mined	and	reserve	of	the	relevant	
ore	body	component	or	phase.	The	cost	
is	recognised	within	Mine	development	
costs	within	the	balance	sheet.

Other assets and depreciation
The	cost,	less	estimated	residual	value,	of	
other	property,	plant	and	equipment	is	
written	off	on	a	straight-line	basis	over	
the	asset’s	expected	useful	life.	This	
includes	the	washing	plant	and	other	key	
surface	infrastructure.	Residual	values	
and	useful	lives	are	reviewed,	and	
adjusted	if	appropriate,	at	each	balance	
sheet	date.	Changes	to	the	estimated	
residual	values	or	useful	lives	are	
accounted	for	prospectively.	Heavy	
surface	mining	and	other	plant	and	
equipment	is	depreciated	at	varying	rates	
depending	upon	its	expected	usage.

The	depreciation	rates	generally	applied	
are:	

Mining	
equipment	

Motor	 
vehicles

Office	
equipment

5	–	10	per	cent	per	annum	of	
the	earlier	of	its	useful	life	or	
the	life	of	the	mine

25	–	33	per	cent	per	annum

10	–	33	per	cent	per	annum

Provisions and contingent liabilities
Provisions	are	recognised	when	the	
Group	has	a	present	obligation	as	a	result	
of	a	past	event	which	it	is	probable	will	
result	in	an	outflow	of	economic	benefits	
that	can	be	reliably	estimated.

A	provision	for	rehabilitation	of	the	mine	
is	initially	recorded	at	present	value	and	
the	discounting	effect	is	unwound	over	
time	as	a	finance	cost.	Changes	to	the	
provision	as	a	result	of	changes	in	
estimates	are	recorded	as	an	increase	/	
decrease	in	the	provision	and	associated	
decommissioning	asset.	The	
decommissioning	asset	is	depreciated	in	
line	with	the	Group’s	depreciation	policy	
over	the	life	of	mine.	The	provision	
includes	the	restoration	of	the	
underground,	opencast,	surface	
operations	and	de-commissioning	of	plant	
and	equipment.	The	timing	and	final	cost	
of	the	rehabilitation	is	uncertain	and	will	
depend	on	the	duration	of	the	mine	life	
and	the	quantities	of	coal	extracted	from	
the	reserves.	

The	purpose	of	mine	development	is	to	
establish	secure	working	conditions	and	
infrastructure	to	allow	the	safe	and	
efficient	extraction	of	recoverable	reserves.	
Depreciation	on	mine	development	costs	is	
not	charged	until	production	commences	
or	the	assets	are	put	to	use.	On	
commencement	of	full	commercial	
production,	depreciation	is	charged	over	
the	life	of	the	associated	mine	reserves	
extractable	using	the	asset	on	a	unit	of	
production	basis.	The	unit	of	production	
calculation	is	based	on	tonnes	mined	as	a	
ratio	to	proven	and	probable	reserves	and	
also	includes	future	forecast	capital	
expenditure.	The	cost	recognised	includes	
the	recognition	of	any	decommissioning	
assets	related	to	mine	development.	

Post production stripping
In	surface	mining	operations,	the	Group	
may	find	it	necessary	to	remove	waste	
materials	to	gain	access	to	coal	reserves	
prior	to	and	after	production	commences.	
Prior	to	production	commencing,	stripping	
costs	are	capitalised	until	the	point	where	
the	overburden	has	been	removed	and	
access	to	the	coal	seam	commences.	
Subsequent	to	production,	waste	
stripping	continues	as	part	of	extraction	
process	as	a	mining	production	activity.	
There	are	two	benefits	accruing	to	the	
Group	from	stripping	activity	during	the	
production	phase:	extraction	of	coal	that	
can	be	used	to	produce	inventory	and	
improved	access	to	further	quantities	of	
material	that	will	be	mined	in	future	
periods.	Economic	coal	extracted	is	
accounted	for	as	inventory.	The	
production	stripping	costs	relating	to	
improved	access	to	further	quantities	in	
future	periods	are	capitalised	as	a	
stripping	activity	asset,	if	and	only	if,	all	of	
the	following	are	met:

• 
• 

 	it	is	probable	that	the	future	economic	
benefit	associated	with	the	stripping	
activity	will	flow	to	the	Group;

64 Bisichi	PLC

 
 
  
Financial statements Group accounting policies

Management	exercises	judgment	in	
measuring	the	Group’s	exposures	to	
contingent	liabilities	through	assessing	
the	likelihood	that	a	potential	claim	or	
liability	will	arise	and	where	possible	in	
quantifying	the	possible	range	of	financial	
outcomes.	Where	there	is	a	dispute	and	
where	a	reliable	estimate	of	the	potential	
liability	cannot	be	made,	or	where	the	
Group,	based	on	legal	advice,	considers	
that	it	is	improbable	that	there	will	be	an	
outflow	of	economic	resources,	no	
provision	is	recognised.

Employee benefits
Share based remuneration
The	company	operates	a	share	option	
scheme.	The	fair	value	of	the	share	
option	scheme	is	determined	at	the	date	
of	grant.	This	fair	value	is	then	expensed	
on	a	straight-line	basis	over	the	vesting	
period,	based	on	an	estimate	of	the	
number	of	shares	that	will	eventually	vest.	
The	fair	value	of	options	granted	is	
calculated	using	a	binomial	or	Black-
Scholes-Merton	model.	Payments	made	
to	employees	on	the	cancellation	or	
settlement	of	options	granted	are	
accounted	for	as	the	repurchase	of	an	
equity	interest,	i.e.	as	a	deduction	from	
equity.	Details	of	the	share	options	in	
issue	are	disclosed	in	the	Directors’	
Remuneration	Report	on	page	32	under	
the	heading	Share	option	schemes	which	
is	within	the	audited	part	of	that	report.	

Pensions 
The	Group	operates	a	defined	contribution	
pension	scheme.	The	contributions	
payable	to	the	scheme	are	expensed	in	the	
period	to	which	they	relate.

Foreign currencies
Monetary	assets	and	liabilities	are	
translated	at	year	end	exchange	rates	and	
the	resulting	exchange	rate	differences	
are	included	in	the	consolidated	income	
statement	within	the	results	of	operating	
activities	if	arising	from	trading	activities,	
including	inter-company	trading	balances	
and	within	finance	cost/income	if	arising	
from	financing.

For	consolidation	purposes,	income	and	
expense	items	are	included	in	the	
consolidated income statement at 
average	rates,	and	assets	and	liabilities	
are	translated	at	year	end	exchange	rates.	
Translation	differences	arising	on	
consolidation	are	recognised	in	other	
comprehensive	income.	Foreign	exchange	
differences	on	intercompany	loans	are	
recorded	in	other	comprehensive	income	
when	the	loans	are	not	considered	as	
trading	balances	and	are	not	expected	to	
be	repaid	in	the	foreseeable	future.	Where	
foreign	operations	are	disposed	of,	the	
cumulative	exchange	differences	of	that	
foreign	operation	are	recognised	in	the	
consolidated	income	statement	when	the	
gain	or	loss	on	disposal	is	recognised.	

Transactions	in	foreign	currencies	are	
translated	at	the	exchange	rate	ruling	on	
the	transaction	date.	

Financial instruments
Financial	assets	and	financial	liabilities	are	
recognised	in	the	Group’s	consolidated	
statement	of	financial	position	when	the	
Group	becomes	a	party	to	the	contractual	
provisions	of	the	instrument.	

Financial assets
Financial	assets	are	classified	as	either	
financial	assets	at	amortised	cost,	at	fair	
value	through	other	comprehensive	
income	(“FVTOCI”)	or	at	fair	value	through	

profit	or	loss	(“FVPL”)	depending	upon	the	
business	model	for	managing	the	
financial	assets	and	the	nature	of	the	
contractual	cash	flow	characteristics	of	
the	financial	asset.	

A	loss	allowance	for	expected	credit	
losses	is	determined	for	all	financial	
assets,	other	than	those	at	FVPL,	at	the	
end	of	each	reporting	period.	The	Group	
applies	a	simplified	approach	to	measure	
the	credit	loss	allowance	for	trade	
receivables	using	the	lifetime	expected	
credit	loss	provision.	The	lifetime	expected	
credit	loss	is	evaluated	for	each	trade	
receivable	taking	into	account	payment	
history,	payments	made	subsequent	to	
year	end	and	prior	to	reporting,	past	
default	experience	and	the	impact	of	any	
other	relevant	and	current	observable	data.	
The	Group	applies	a	general	approach	on	
all	other	receivables	classified	as	financial	
assets.	The	general	approach	recognises	
lifetime	expected	credit	losses	when	there	
has	been	a	significant	increase	in	credit	
risk	since	initial	recognition.

The	Group	derecognises	a	financial	asset	
when	the	contractual	rights	to	the	cash	
flows	from	the	asset	expire,	or	when	it	
transfers	the	financial	asset	and	
substantially	all	the	risks	and	rewards	of	
ownership	of	the	asset	to	another	party.	
The	Group	derecognises	financial	
liabilities	when	the	Group’s	obligations	are	
discharged,	cancelled	or	have	expired.

Bank loans and overdrafts
Bank	loans	and	overdrafts	are	included	as	
financial	liabilities	on	the	Group	balance	
sheet	at	the	amounts	drawn	on	the	
particular	facilities	net	of	the	unamortised	
cost	of	financing.	Interest	payable	on	
those	facilities	is	expensed	as	finance	
cost	in	the	period	to	which	it	relates.

Bisichi	PLC

6565

Financial statements Group accounting policies

Lease liabilities
For	any	new	contracts	entered	into	the	
Group	considers	whether	a	contract	is,	or	
contains	a	lease.	A	lease	is	defined	as	‘a	
contract,	or	part	of	a	contract,	that	
conveys	the	right	to	use	an	asset	(the	
underlying	asset)	for	a	period	of	time	in	
exchange	for	consideration’.	To	apply	this	
definition	the	Group	assesses	whether	the	
contract	contains	an	identified	asset	and	
has	the	right	to	obtain	substantially	all	of	
the	economic	benefits	from	use	of	the	
identified	asset	throughout	the	period	of	
use.	

At	lease	commencement	date,	the	Group	
recognises	a	right-of-use	asset	and	a	
lease	liability	on	the	balance	sheet.	

Right-of-use	assets,	excluding	property	
head	leases,	have	been	included	in	
property,	plant	and	equipment	and	are	
measured	at	cost,	which	is	made	up	of	the	
initial	measurement	of	the	lease	liability	
and	any	initial	direct	costs	incurred	by	the	
Group.	The	Group	depreciates	the	
right-of-use	assets	on	a	straight-line	basis	
from	the	lease	commencement	date	to	
the	earlier	of	the	end	of	the	useful	life	of	
the	right-of-use	asset	or	the	end	of	the	
lease	term.

At	the	commencement	date,	the	Group	
measures	the	lease	liability	at	the	present	
value	of	the	lease	payments	unpaid	at	
that	date,	discounted	using	the	interest	
rate	implicit	in	the	lease	if	that	rate	is	
readily	available	or	the	Group’s	
incremental	borrowing	rate.	Liabilities	
relating	to	short	term	leases	are	included	
within	trade	and	other	payables.

Lease	payments	included	in	the	
measurement	of	the	lease	liability	are	
made	up	of	fixed	payments	and	variable	
payments	based	on	an	index	or	rate,	
initially	measured	using	the	index	or	rate	
at	the	commencement	date.	Subsequent	
to	initial	measurement,	the	liability	will	be	
reduced	for	payments	made	and	increased	
for	interest.	It	is	re-measured	to	reflect	
any	reassessment	or	modification.	When	
the	lease	liability	is	re-measured,	the	
corresponding	adjustment	is	reflected	in	
the	right-of-use	asset,	or	profit	and	loss	if	
the	right-of-use	asset	is	already	reduced	
to	zero.

Lease	liabilities	that	arise	for	investment	
properties	held	under	a	leasehold	interest	
and	accounted	for	as	investment	property	
are	initially	calculated	as	the	present	value	
of	the	minimum	lease	payments,	reducing	
in	subsequent	reporting	periods	by	the	
apportionment	of	payments	to	the	lessor.

The	Group	has	elected	to	account	for	
short-term	leases	and	leases	of	low-value	
assets	using	the	practical	expedients	
available	in	IFRS	16.	Instead	of	recognising	
a	right-of-use	asset	and	lease	liability,	the	
payments	in	relation	to	these	are	
recognised	as	an	expense	in	profit	or	loss	
on	a	straight-line	basis	over	the	lease	term.

Investments
Current	financial	asset	investments	and	
other	investments	classified	as	non-
current	(“The	investments”)	comprise	of	
shares	in	listed	companies.	The	
investments	are	measured	at	fair	value.	
Any	changes	in	fair	value	are	recognised	
in	the	profit	or	loss	account	and	
accumulated	in	retained	earnings.	

66 Bisichi	PLC

Trade receivables
Trade	receivables	are	accounted	for	at	
amortised	cost.	Trade	receivables	do	not	
carry	any	interest	and	are	stated	at	their	
nominal	value	as	reduced	by	appropriate	
expected	credit	loss	allowances	for	
estimated	recoverable	amounts	as	the	
interest	that	would	be	recognised	from	
discounting	future	cash	payments	over	
the	short	payment	period	is	not	
considered	to	be	material.

Trade payables
Trade	payables	cost	are	not	interest	
bearing	and	are	stated	at	their	nominal	
value,	as	the	interest	that	would	be	
recognised	from	discounting	future	cash	
payments	over	the	short	payment	period	
is	not	considered	to	be	material.

Other financial assets and liabilities
The	Group’s	other	financial	assets	and	
liabilities	not	disclosed	above	are	
accounted	for	at	amortised	cost.

Joint ventures
Investments	in	joint	ventures,	being	those	
entities	over	whose	activities	the	Group	
has	joint	control,	as	established	by	
contractual	agreement,	are	included	at	
cost	together	with the	Group’s	share	of	
post-acquisition	reserves,	on	an	equity	
basis.	Dividends	received	are	credited	
against	the	investment.	Joint	control	is	
the	contractually	agreed	sharing	of	control	
over	an	arrangement,	which	exists	only	
when	decisions	about	relevant	strategic	
and/or	key	operating	decisions	require	
unanimous	consent	of	the	parties	sharing	
control.	Control	over	the	arrangement	is	
assessed	by	the	Group	in	accordance	
with	the	definition	of	control	under	IFRS	
10.	Loans	to	joint	ventures	are	classified	
as	non-current	assets	when	they	are	not	
expected	to	be	received	in	the	normal	
working	capital	cycle.	Trading	receivables	
and	payables	to	joint	ventures	are	
classified	as	current	assets	and	liabilities.

Financial statements Group accounting policies

Inventories
Inventories	are	stated	at	the	lower	of	cost	
and	net	realisable	value.	Cost	includes	
materials,	direct	labour	and	overheads	
relevant	to	the	stage	of	production.	Cost	
is	determined	using	the	weighted	average	
method.	Net	realisable	value	is	based	on	
estimated	selling	price	less	all	further	
costs	of	completion	and	all	relevant	
marketing,	selling	and	distribution costs.	

Impairment
Whenever	events	or	changes	in	
circumstance	indicate	that	the	carrying	
amount	of	an	asset	may	not	be	
recoverable	an	asset	is	reviewed	for	
impairment.	This	includes	mining	
reserves,	plant	and	equipment	and	net	
investments	in	joint	ventures.	A	review	
involves	determining	whether	the	carrying	
amounts	are	in	excess	of	their	
recoverable	amounts.	An	asset’s	
recoverable	amount	is	determined	as	the	
higher	of	its	fair	value	less	costs	of	
disposal	and	its	value	in	use.	Such	
reviews	are	undertaken	on	an	asset-by-
asset	basis,	except	where	assets	do	not	
generate	cash	flows	independent	of	other	
assets,	in	which	case	the	review	is	
undertaken	on	a	cash	generating	unit	
basis.

If	the	carrying	amount	of	an	asset	
exceeds	its	recoverable	amount	an	
asset’s	carrying	value	is	written	down	to	
its	estimated	recoverable	amount	(being	
the	higher	of	the	fair	value	less	cost	to	
sell	and	value	in	use)	if	that	is	less	than	
the	asset’s	carrying	amount.	Any	change	
in	carrying	value	is	recognised	in	the	
comprehensive	income	statement.

Deferred tax
Deferred	tax	is	the	tax	expected	to	be	
payable	or	recoverable	on	differences	
between	the	carrying	amounts	of	assets	
and	liabilities	in	the	financial	statements	
and	the	corresponding	tax	bases	used	in	

the	tax	computations,	and	is	accounted	
for	using	the	balance	sheet	liability	
method.	Deferred	tax	liabilities	are	
generally	recognised	for	all	taxable	
temporary	differences	and	deferred	tax	
assets	are	recognised	to	the	extent	that	it	
is	probable	that	taxable	profits	will	be	
available	against	which	deductible	
temporary	differences	can	be	utilised.	In	
respect	of	the	deferred	tax	on	the	
revaluation	surplus,	this	is	calculated	on	
the	basis	of	the	chargeable	gains	that	
would	crystallise	on	the	sale	of	the	
investment	portfolio	as	at	the	reporting	
date.	The	calculation	takes	account	of	
indexation	on	the	historical	cost	of	the	
properties	and	any	available	capital	
losses.

Deferred	tax	is	calculated	at	the	tax	rates	
that	are	expected	to	apply	in	the	period	
when	the	liability	is	settled	or	the	asset	is	
realised.	Deferred	tax	is	charged	or	
credited	in	the	Group	income	statement,	
except	when	it	relates	to	items	charged	or	
credited	directly	to	other	comprehensive	
income,	in	which	case	it	is	also	dealt	with	
in	other	comprehensive	income.

Dividends
Dividends	payable	on	the	ordinary	share	
capital	are	recognised	as	a	liability	in	the	
period	in	which	they	are	approved.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash	comprises	cash	in	hand	and	
on-demand	deposits.	Cash	and	cash	
equivalents	comprises	short-term,	highly	
liquid	investments	that	are	readily	
convertible	to	known	amounts	of	cash	
and	which	are	subject	to	an	insignificant	
risk	of	changes	in	value	and	original	
maturities	of	three	months	or	less.	The	
cash	and	cash	equivalents	shown	in	the	
cashflow	statement	are	stated	net	of	
bank	overdrafts	that	are	repayable	on	
demand	as	per	IAS	7.	This	includes	the	
structured	trade	finance	facility	held	in	

South	Africa	as	detailed	in	note	22.	
These	facilities	are	considered	to	form	an	
integral	part	of	the	treasury	management	
of	the	Group	and	can	fluctuate	from	
positive	to	negative	balances	during	the	
period.

Segmental reporting
For	management	reporting	purposes,	the	
Group	is	organised	into	business	
segments	distinguishable	by	economic	
activity.	The	Group’s	material	business	
segments	are	mining	activities	and	
investment	properties.	These	business	
segments	are	subject	to	risks	and	returns	
that	are	different	from	those	of	other	
business	segments	and	are	the	primary	
basis	on	which	the	Group	reports	its	
segment	information.	This	is	consistent	
with	the	way	the	Group	is	managed	and	
with	the	format	of	the	Group’s	internal	
financial	reporting.	Significant	revenue	
from	transactions	with	any	individual	
customer,	which	makes	up	10	percent	or	
more	of	the	total	revenue	of	the	Group,	is	
separately	disclosed	within	each	
segment.	All	coal	exports	are	sales	to	
coal	traders	at	Richard	Bay’s	terminal	in	
South	Africa	with	the	risks	and	rewards	
passing	to	the	coal	trader	at	the	terminal.	
Whilst	the	coal	traders	will	ultimately	sell	
the	coal	on	the	international	markets	the	
Company	has	no	visibility	over	the	
ultimate	destination	of	the	coal.	
Accordingly,	the	export	sales	are	
recorded	as	South	African	revenue.

Bisichi	PLC

6767

Financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2021

1. SEGMENTAL REPORTING 

Business analysis 

Significant	revenue	customer	A

Significant	revenue	customer	B

Significant	revenue	customer	C
Other	revenue	

Segment revenue 

Operating	(loss)/profit	before	fair	value	adjustments	
& exchange movements
Revaluation	of	investments	&	exchange	movements

Operating profit and segment result

Segment assets

Unallocated assets
	 –	Non-current	assets
	 –	Cash	&	cash	equivalents

Total assets excluding investment in joint ventures and assets held for sale

Segment	liabilities
Borrowings

Total liabilities

Net assets

Non segmental assets
	 –	Investment	in	joint	ventures	

Net assets as per balance sheet 

Geographic analysis

Revenue

Operating	profit/(loss)	and	segment	result

Depreciation

Non-current	assets	excluding	investments

Total net assets
Capital	expenditure

68 Bisichi	PLC

Mining
£’000

23,206

12,656

6,169
7,195

49,226

1,695

(121)

1,574

17,350

2021

Property
£’000

Other
£’000

-

-

-
1,119

1,119

592

255

847

12,242

-

-

-
175

175

170

812

982

4,319

(12,227)
(2,680)

(14,907)

(1,522)
(3,839)

(5,361)

(5)
-

(5)

United
Kingdom
£’000

1,294

687

(32)

10,748

14,400
35

South
Africa
£’000

49,222

2,716

(2,539)

9,018

3,435
1,781

Total 
£’000

23,206

12,656

6,169
8,489

50,520

2,457

946

3,403

33,911

48
3,018

36,977

(13,754)
(6,519)

(20,273)

16,704

1,131

17,835

Total
£’000

50,516

3,403

(2,571)

19,766

17,835
1,816

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

1. SEGMENTAL REPORTING CONTINUED

Business analysis 

Significant	revenue	customer	A

Significant	revenue	customer	B

Significant	revenue	customer	C
Other	revenue	

Segment revenue 

Operating	(loss)/profit	before	fair	value	adjustments	
& exchange movements
Revaluation	of	investments	&	exchange	movements

Operating profit and segment result

Segment assets

Unallocated assets
	 –	Non-current	assets
	 –	Cash	&	cash	equivalents

Total assets excluding investment in joint ventures and assets held for sale

Segment	liabilities
Borrowings

Total liabilities

Net assets

Non segmental assets
	 –	Investment	in	joint	ventures	

Net assets as per balance sheet 

Mining
£’000

9,042

7,588

6,291
5,646

28,567

(4,014)

39

(3,975)

19,110

2020

Property
£’000

Other
£’000

-

-

-
1,181

1,181

658

(1,295)

(637)

11,891

-

-

-
57

57

52

67

119

2,581

(11,919)
(5,253)

(17,172)

(1,471)
(3,799)

(5,270)

(19)
-

(19)

Total 
£’000

9,042

7,588

6,291
6,884

29,805

(3,304)

(1,189)

(4,493)

33,582

45
3,768

37,395

(13,409)
(9,052)

(22,461)

14,934

1,255

16,189

Bisichi	PLC

6969

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

1. SEGMENTAL REPORTING CONTINUED

Geographic analysis

Revenue

Operating	profit/(loss)	and	segment	result

Depreciation

Non-current	assets	excluding	investments

Total net assets
Capital	expenditure

2. REVENUE

Revenue from contracts with customers:
Coal	sales	and	processing

Service	charges	recoverable	from	tenants

Other:
Rental income
Other	revenue

Revenue 

United
Kingdom
£’000

1,238

(931)

(21)

10,516

13,279
36

South
Africa
£’000

28,567

(3,562)

(2,172)

10,129

2,910
3,435

Total
£’000

29,805

(4,493)

(2,193)

20,645

16,189
3,471

2021
£’000 

2020 
£’000

49,226

130

989
175

28,567

156

1,025
57

50,520

29,805

Segmental	mining	revenue	is	derived	principally	from	coal	sales	and	is	recognised	once	the	control	of	the	goods	has	transferred	
from	the	Group	to	the	buyer.	Segmental	property	revenue	is	derived	from	rental	income	and	service	charges	recoverable	from	
tenants.	This	is	consistent	with	the	revenue	information	disclosed	for	each	reportable	segment	(see	note	1).	Rental	income	is	
recognised	on	a	straight-line	basis	over	the	term	of	the	lease.	Service	charges	recoverable	from	tenants	are	recognised	over	time	
as	the	service	is	rendered.	Revenue	is	measured	based	on	the	consideration	specified	in	the	contract	with	the	customer	or	tenant.	

3. OPERATING COSTS

Mining
Property

Cost of sales
Administration

Operating costs 

The	direct	property	costs	are:

	 Direct	property	expense
  Bad debts

Operating	costs	above	include	depreciation	of	£2,571,000	(2020:	£2,193,000).

70 Bisichi	PLC

2021
£’000 

38,008
400

38,408
9,655

48,063

351
49

400

2020 
£’000

24,645
342

24,987
8,122

33,109

272
70

342

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

4. (LOSS)/GAIN ON REVALUATION OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
The	reconciliation	of	the	investment	(deficit)/surplus	to	the	gain	on	revaluation	of	investment	properties	in	the	income	statement	is	
set	out	below:

Investment	deficit	
Gain/(Loss)	on	valuation	movement	in	respect	of	head	lease	payments

Loss on revaluation of investment properties

5. PROFIT BEFORE TAXATION
Profit	before	taxation	is	arrived	at	after	charging:

Staff costs (see note 29)

Depreciation

Exchange	loss

Fees	payable	to	the	company’s	auditor	for	the	audit	of	the	company’s	annual	accounts

Fees	payable	to	the	company’s	auditor	and	its	associates	for	other	services:

	 The	audit	of	the	company’s	subsidiaries	pursuant	to	legislation

	 Audit	related	services

	 Non-audit	related	services
Decrease/(Increase)	in	value	of	Inventory

2021
£’000 

255
(26)

229

2021
£’000 

7,491

2,571

(121)

51

37

-

-
2,105

2020 
£’000	

(1,313)
18

(1,295)

2020 
£’000	

5,890

2,193

39

84

26

4

2
(1,128)

The	directors	consider	the	auditors	were	best	placed	to	provide	the	above	non-audit	and	audit	related	services	which	refer	to	
regulatory	matters.	The	audit	committee	reviews	the	nature	and	extent	of	non-audit	services	to	ensure	that	independence	is	
maintained.

6. DIRECTORS’ EMOLUMENTS
Directors’	emoluments	are	shown	in	the	Directors’	remuneration	report	on	page	32	which	is	within	the	audited	part	of	that	report.

7. INTEREST PAYABLE

On	bank	overdrafts	and	bank	loans

Unwinding	of	discount

Lease	liabilities
Other	interest	payable

Interest payable 

2021
£’000 

2020
£’000	

554

-

29
216

799

547

-

26
68

641

Bisichi	PLC

7171

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

8. TAXATION

(a) Based on the results for the year:
Current	tax	-	UK

Current	tax	-	Overseas
Corporation	tax	-	adjustment	in	respect	of	prior	year	–	UK

Current	tax
Deferred	tax

Total tax in income statement charge 

2021
£’000 

2020
£’000	

-

750
-

750
45

795

-

12
2

14
(1,416)

(1,402)

 (b) Factors affecting tax charge for the year:
The	corporation	tax	assessed	for	the	year	is	different	from	that	at	the	standard	rate	of	corporation	tax	in	the	United	Kingdom	of	
19.00%	(2020:	19%).

The	differences	are	explained	below:

Profit/	Loss	on	ordinary	activities	before	taxation

Tax	on	profit/	loss	on	ordinary	activities	at	19.00%	(2020:	19.00%)

Effects	of:

Expenses	not	deductible	for	tax	purposes

Capital	gains\(losses)	on	disposal

Adjustment	to	tax	rate

Other	differences
Adjustment	in	respect	of	prior	years

Total tax in income statement (credit) / charge

(c) Analysis of United Kingdom and overseas tax:
United	Kingdom	tax	included	in	above:

Current	tax
Deferred	tax

Overseas	tax	included	in	above:

Current	tax
Adjustment	in	respect	of	prior	years

Current	tax
Deferred	tax

2,501

475

49

20

260

(9)
-

795

-
152

152

750
-

750
(107)

643

(5,196)

(987)

23

-

(360)

(80)
2

(1,402)

-
(312)

(312)

12
2

14
(1,104)

(1,090)

Overseas	tax	is	derived	from	the	Group’s	South	African	mining	operation.	Refer	to	note	1	for	a	report	on	the	Groups’	mining	and	
South	African	segmental	reporting.	The	adjustment	to	tax	rate	arises	due	to	the	deferred	tax	rate	used	in	the	UK	for	the	year	of	
25%	(2020:	19%)	and	the	corporation	tax	rate	assessed	in	South	Africa	for	the	year	of	28%	(2020:	28%)	being	different	from	
the	corporation	tax	rate	in	the	UK.	
72 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

9. SHAREHOLDER DIVIDENDS

Dividends	paid	during	the	year	relating	to	the	prior	period

Dividends	relating	to	the	current	period:
Proposed	dividend	for	2021

Proposed	special	dividend	for	2021

2021 
Per share

-

4p

2p

6p

2021 
£’000

-

2020
Per	share

1.00p

427

214

641

-

-

2020 
£’000

107

-

-

The	dividends	relating	to	the	current	period	are	not	accounted	for	until	they	have	been	approved	at	the	Annual	General	Meeting.	

10. PROFIT/(LOSS) AND DILUTED PROFIT/(LOSS) PER SHARE
Both	the	basic	and	diluted	profit/(loss)	per	share	calculations	are	based	on	a	profit	after	tax	of	£1,491,000	(2020:	loss	of	
£3,354,000).	The	basic	profit/(loss)	per	share	has	been	calculated	on	a	weighted	average	of	10,676,839	(2020:	10,676,839)	
ordinary	shares	being	in	issue	during	the	period.	The	diluted	profit	per	share	has	been	calculated	on	the	weighted	average	number	
of	shares	in	issue	of	10,676,839	(2020:	10,676,839)	plus	the	dilutive	potential	ordinary	shares	arising	from	share	options	of	21,923	
(2020:	Nil)	totalling	10,698,762	(2020:	10,676,839).

11. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

Valuation	at	1	January	2021
Revaluation

Valuation at 31 December 2021

Valuation at 1 January 2020
Revaluation

Valuation at 31 December 2020

Historical	cost

At 31 December 2021
At	31	December	2020

Freehold	
£’000

Long	
Leasehold
£’000

Head 
Lease
£’000

7,875
355

8,230

9,020
(1,145)

7,875

5,851

5,851

2,395
(100)

2,295

2,545
(150)

2,395

728

728

201

(26)

175

183

18

201

-

-

Total
£’000

10,471
229

10,700

11,748 
(1,277)

10,471

6,579

6,579

Long	leasehold	properties	are	those	for	which	the	unexpired	term	at	the	balance	sheet	date	is	not	less	than	50	years.	All	
investment	properties	are	held	for	use	in	operating	leases	and	all	properties	generated	rental	income	during	the	period.	

Freehold	and	Long	Leasehold	properties	were	externally	professionally	valued	at	31	December	on	an	open	market	basis	by:

Carter	Towler	

2021 
£’000

10,525

2020
£’000

10,270

The	valuations	were	carried	out	in	accordance	with	the	Statements	of	Asset	Valuation	and	Guidance	Notes	published	by	The	Royal	
Institution	of	Chartered	Surveyors.

Each	year	external	valuers	are	appointed	by	the	Executive	Directors	on	behalf	of	the	Board.	The	valuers	are	selected	based	upon	
their	knowledge,	independence	and	reputation	for	valuing	assets	such	as	those	held	by	the	Group.

Bisichi	PLC

7373

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

11. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES CONTINUED
Valuations	are	performed	annually	and	are	performed	consistently	across	all	investment	properties	in	the	Group’s	portfolio.	At	
each	reporting	date	appropriately	qualified	employees	of	the	Group	verify	all	significant	inputs	and	review	the	computational	
outputs.	Valuers	submit	their	report	to	the	Board	on	the	outcome	of	each	valuation	round.

Valuations	take	into	account	tenure,	lease	terms	and	structural	condition.	The	inputs	underlying	the	valuations	include	market	rent	
or	business	profitability,	likely	incentives	offered	to	tenants,	forecast	growth	rates,	yields,	EBITDA,	discount	rates,	construction	
costs	including	any	specific	site	costs	(for	example	section	106),	professional	fees,	developer’s	profit	including	contingencies,	
planning	and	construction	timelines,	lease	regear	costs,	planning	risk	and	sales	prices	based	on	known	market	transactions	for	
similar	properties	to	those	being	valued.

Valuations	are	based	on	what	is	determined	to	be	the	highest	and	best	use.	When	considering	the	highest	and	best	use	a	valuer	
will	consider,	on	a	property	by	property	basis,	its	actual	and	potential	uses	which	are	physically,	legally	and	financially	viable.	
Where	the	highest	and	best	use	differs	from	the	existing	use,	the	valuer	will	consider	the	cost	and	likelihood	of	achieving	and	
implanting	this	change	in	arriving	at	its	valuation.

There	are	often	restrictions	on	Freehold	and	Leasehold	property	which	could	have	a	material	impact	on	the	realisation	of	these	
assets.	The	most	significant	of	these	occur	when	planning	permission	or	lease	extension	and	renegotiation	of	use	are	required	or	
when	a	credit	facility	is	in	place.	These	restrictions	are	factored	in	the	property’s	valuation	by	the	external	valuer.

IFRS	13	sets	out	a	valuation	hierarchy	for	assets	and	liabilities	measured	at	fair	value	as	follows:	

Level	1:	

valuation	based	on	inputs	on	quoted	market	prices	in	active	markets

Level	2:		
directly	or	from	market	prices	or	indirectly	derived	from	market	prices.

valuation	based	on	inputs	other	than	quoted	prices	included	within	level	1	that	maximise	the	use	of	observable	data	

Level	3:		

where	one	or	more	significant	inputs	to	valuations	are	not	based	on	observable	market	data

The	inter-relationship	between	key	unobservable	inputs	and	the	Groups’	properties	is	detailed	in	the	table	below:	

Class of property  
Level 3

Freehold	–	external	
valuation

Valuation technique

Key  
unobservable inputs

Income	capitalisation Estimated	rental	

value	per	sq	ft	p.a
Equivalent	Yield

Carrying/
fair value
2021
£’000

8,230

Carrying/
fair	value
2020
£’000

Range 
(weighted 
average) 
2021

Range	
(weighted	
average)	
2020

7,875

£6 – £29 

£6	–	£27	

(£21)

8.9% – 14.7% 

(£19)
9.4%	–	

(11.2%)

16.7%	

Long	leasehold	–	
external	valuation

Income	capitalisation Estimated	rental	

2,295

2,395

£9 – £9 

value	per	sq	ft	p.a

Equivalent	yield

(11.8%)

£8	–	£8	

(£8)

(£9)

9.8% – 9.8% 

8.9%	–	8.9%	

(9.8%)

(8.9%)

At 31 December 2021

10,525

10,270

There	are	interrelationships	between	all	these	inputs	as	they	are	determined	by	market	conditions.	The	existence	of	an	increase	in	
more	than	one	input	would	be	to	magnify	the	input	on	the	valuation.	The	impact	on	the	valuation	will	be	mitigated	by	the	
interrelationship	of	two	inputs	in	opposite	directions,	for	example,	an	increase	in	rent	may	be	offset	by	an	increase	in	yield.

74 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

11. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES CONTINUED
The	table	below	illustrates	the	impact	of	changes	in	key	unobservable	inputs	on	the	carrying	/	fair	value	of	the	Group’s	properties:

Freehold	–	external	valuation

Long	Leasehold	–	external	valuation

12. MINING RESERVES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Cost	at	1	January	2021

Exchange	adjustment

Additions
Disposals

Cost at 31 December 2021

Accumulated	depreciation	at	1	January	2021

Exchange	adjustment

Charge	for	the	year
Disposals

Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 2021

Net book value at 31 December 2021

Cost	at	1	January	2020

Exchange	adjustment

Additions
Disposals

Cost at 31 December 2020

Accumulated	depreciation	at	1	January	2020

Exchange	adjustment

Charge	for	the	year
Disposals

Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 2020

Net book value at 31 December 2020

Estimated rental  
value 10% increase  
or decrease

2021
£’000

2020
£’000

Equivalent yield
25 basis point contrac-
tion or expansion
2021
£’000

2020
£’000

823 / (823)

788	/	(788)

203 / (193)

185	/	(177)

230 / (230)

240	/	(240)

60 / (57)

69	/	(65)

Mining
equipment	
and	develop-
ment costs
£’000

Mining
reserves
£’000

Motor
vehicles
£’000

Office
equipment
£’000

1,138

(41)

-
-

1,097

1,123

(41)

7
-

1,089

8

1,226

(88)

-
-

1,138

1,212

(89)

-
-

1,123

15

28,371

(1,059)

1,772
(21)

29,063

18,399

(710)

2,499
(21)

20,167

8,896

26,674

(1,733)

3,430
-

28,371

17,405

(1,136)

2,130
-

18,399

9,972

372

(11)

35
-

396

215

(7)

56
-

264

132

361

(25)

36
-

372

171

(10)

54
-

215

157

174 

(4)

9
-

179 

144

(3)

9
-

150

29

175 

(6)

5
-

174 

140

(5)

9
-

144

30

Total
£’000

30,055

(1,115)

1,816
(21)

30,735

19,881

(761)

2,571
(21)

21,670

9,065

28,436

(1,852)

3,471
-

30,055

18,928

(1,240)

2,193
-

19,881

10,174

Bisichi	PLC

7575

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

12. MINING RESERVES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT CONTINUED
Included	in	the	above	line	items	are	right-of-use	assets	over	the	following:

Mining
Equipment	
and	develop-
ment costs 
£’000

Motor
vehicles
£’000

263

-

(6)
(38)

219

52

248

(18)
(19)

263

2021
Other 
£’000

1,746

701

1,630

(446)
-

3,631

45

35

-
(32)

48

29

36

-
(20)

45

2020

Net  
investment	 

in	joint
ventures
assets
£’000

1,342

-

-

-
(87)

1,255

Total
£’000

308

35

(6)
(70)

267

81

284

(18)
(39)

308

2020
Other
£’000

287

201

1,359

(101)
-

1,746

2021

Net  
investment in 
joint
ventures
assets
£’000

1,255

-

-

-
(125)

1,130

Net	book	value	at	1	January	2021

Additions

Exchange	adjustment
Depreciation

Net book value at 31 December 2021

Net	book	value	at	1	January	2020

Additions

Exchange	adjustment
Depreciation

Net book value at 31 December 2020

13. INVESTMENTS HELD AS NON-CURRENT ASSETS

At	1	January

Share	of	(loss)/gain	in	investment

Additions

Disposals
Share	of	(loss)/gain	in	joint	ventures

Net assets at 31 December

76 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

13. INVESTMENTS HELD AS NON-CURRENT ASSETS CONTINUED

Other	investments	comprise	of	the	following:	

Net	book	value	of	unquoted	investments

Net	book	and	market	value	of	readily	realisable	investments	listed	on	stock	exchanges	in	the	United	
Kingdom
Net	book	and	market	value	of	readily	realisable	investments	listed	on	overseas	stock	exchanges

2021
£’000 

-

1,564

2,067

3,631

2020 
£’000	

-

959

787

1,746

14. JOINT VENTURES

Development Physics Limited 
The	company	owns	a	third	of	the	issued	share	capital	of	Development	Physics	Limited,	an	unlisted	property	development	company.	
At	year	end,	the	negative	carrying	value	of	the	investment	held	by	the	Group	was	£3,000	(2020:	£Nil).	The	remaining	two	thirds	is	
held	equally	by	London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC	and	Metroprop	Real	Estate	Ltd.	Development	Physics	Limited	is	incorporated	
in	England	and	Wales	and	its	registered	address	is	12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	W1W8BJ.	It	has	issued	share	capital	of	99	
(2020:	99)	ordinary	shares	of	£1	each.	No	dividends	were	received	during	the	period.	

Dragon Retail Properties Limited
The	company	owns	50%	of	the	issued	share	capital	of	Dragon	Retail	Properties	Limited,	an	unlisted	property	investment	
company.	At	year	end,	the	carrying	value	of	the	investment	held	by	the	Group	was	£637,000	(2020:	£670,000).	The	remaining	
50%	is	held	by	London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC.	Dragon	Retail	Properties	Limited	is	incorporated	in	England	and	Wales	and	
its	registered	address	is	12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	W1W8BJ.	It	has	issued	share	capital	of	500,000	(2020:	500,000)	
ordinary	shares	of	£1	each.	No	dividends	were	received	during	the	period.	It	holds	a	Santander	bank	loan	of	£1.164million	secured	
against	its	investment	property.	The	bank	loan	of	£1.164million	is	secured	by	way	of	a	first	charge	on	specific	freehold	property	at	a	
value	of	£2.08	million.	The	interest	cost	of	the	loan	is	2.75	per	cent	above	the	bank’s	base	rate.	A	refinancing	of	this	loan	is	
currently	underway.	The	loan	originally	expired	in	October	2020	but	has	been	extended	to	April	2022,	and	the	lender	has	offered	
to	extend	this	further	if	required.	The	company	has	agreed	terms	with	a	new	lender	to	refinance	this	loan	in	full	and	are	expecting	
to	complete	this	shortly.

West Ealing Projects Limited 
The	company	owns	50%	of	the	issued	share	capital	of	West	Ealing	Projects	Limited,	an	unlisted	property	development	company.	
At	year	end,	the	carrying	value	of	the	investment	held	by	the	Group	was	£496,000	(2020:	£585,000).	The	remaining	50%	is	held	
by	London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC.	West	Ealing	Projects	Limited	is	incorporated	in	England	and	Wales	and	its	registered	
address	is	12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	W1W8BJ.	It	has	issued	share	capital	of	1,000,000	(2020:	1,000,000)	ordinary	shares	
of	£1	each.	No	dividends	were	received	during	the	period.	

Bisichi	PLC

7777

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

14. JOINT VENTURES CONTINUED

Development	
Physics
£’000

Turnover

Profit	and	loss:

(Loss)/Profit	before	depreciation,	
interest	and	taxation
Depreciation	and	amortisation

(Loss)/Profit	before	interest	and	
taxation

Interest	Income
Interest	expense

(Loss)/Profit	before	taxation
Taxation

(Loss)/Profit after taxation

Balance sheet

Non-current assets

Cash	and	cash	equivalents

Property	inventory

Other	current	assets
Other	current	liabilities

Net current assets 

Non-current	borrowings
Other	non-current	liabilities

Net assets at 31 December

Share of net assets at 31 December

-

(10)

-

(10)

-
-

(10)
-

(10)

-

-

232

27
(269)

(10)

-
-

(10)

(3)

Dragon
£’000

168

West	 

Ealing
£’000

58

2021
£’000

226

Dragon
£’000

143

West	 

Ealing
£’000

192

2020
£’000

335

(32)

(3)

(35)

-
(31)

(66)
-

(66)

2,091

27

-

374
(53)

348

(1,165)
-

1,274

637

(215)

(257)

(280)

-

(215)

-
(1)

(216)
38

(178)

-

5

7,494

70
(6,549)

1,020

(28)
-

992

496

(3)

(260)

-
(32)

(292)
38

(254)

2,091

32

7,726

471
(6,871)

1,358

(1,193)
-

2,256

1,130

(10)

(290)

-
(28)

(318)
44

(274)

2,146

12

-

460
(92)

380

(1,186)
-

1,340

670

100

-

100

-
-

100
-

100

-

27

7,056

103
(5,962)

1,224

(54)
-

1,170

585

(180)

(10)

(190)

-
(28)

(218)
44

(174)

2,146

39

7,056

563
(6,054)

1,604

(1,240)
-

2,510

1,255

78 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

15. SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
The	company	owns	the	following	ordinary	share	capital	of	the	subsidiaries	which	are	included	within	the	consolidated	financial	
statements:

Activity

Percentage	of
share	capital

Registered	address

Country	of
incorporation

Directly held:
Mineral	Products	Limited

Share	dealing 100%

Bisichi	(Properties)	Limited

Property

100%

Bisichi	Northampton	Limited

Property

100%

Bisichi	Trustee	Limited	

Property

100%

Urban	First	(Northampton)	Limited

Property

100%

Bisichi	Mining	(Exploration)	Limited

Ninghi	Marketing	Limited

Bisichi	Mining	Management	
Services Limited

Holding	
company

Dormant

100%

90.1%

Dormant

100%

Bisichi	Coal	Mining	(Pty)	Limited

Coal	mining

100%

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

12	Little	Portland	Street,	London,	
W1W8BJ

England	 
and	Wales

England	 
and	Wales

England	 
and	Wales

England	 
and	Wales

England	 
and	Wales

England	 
and	Wales

England	 
and	Wales

England	 
and	Wales

Samora	Machel	Street,	Bethal	Road,	
Middelburg,	Mpumalanga,	1050

South	Africa

Indirectly held:
Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Limited

Coal	mining

62.5%

Samora	Machel	Street,	Bethal	Road,	
Middelburg,	Mpumalanga,	1050

South	Africa

Sisonke	Coal	Processing	(Pty)	Limited

Coal 
processing

62.5%

Samora	Machel	Street,	Bethal	Road,	
Middelburg,	Mpumalanga,	1050

South	Africa

Black	Wattle	Klipfontein	(Pty)	Limited

Coal	mining

62.5%

Samora	Machel	Street,	Bethal	Road,

South	Africa

Amandla	Ehtu	Mineral	Resource	
Development (Pty)	Limited

Dormant

70%

Middelburg,	Mpumalanga,	1050
Samora	Machel	Street,	Bethal	Road,

Middelburg,	Mpumalanga,	1050

South	Africa

Details	on	the	non-controlling	interest	in	subsidiaries	are	shown	under	note	27.

Bisichi	PLC

7979

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

16. INVENTORIES

Coal
Washed

Mining	Production

Work	in	progress
Other

17.  TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Financial assets falling due within one year:
	 Trade	receivables

	 Amount	owed	by	joint	venture

	 Other	receivables

Non-financial instruments falling due within one year:
	 Prepayments	and	accrued	income

2021
£’000 

1,185

59

-
9

2020
£’000	

2,924

394

111
16

1,253

3,445

2021
£’000 

6,328

1,067

984

247

8,626

2020 
£’000	

5,155

952

680

171

6,958

Financial	assets	falling	due	within	one	year	are	held	at	amortised	cost.	The	fair	value	of	trade	and	other	receivables	approximates	
their	carrying	amounts.	The	Group	applies	a	simplified	approach	to	measure	the	credit	loss	allowance	for	trade	receivables	using	
the	lifetime	expected	credit	loss	provision.	The	lifetime	expected	credit	loss	is	evaluated	for	each	trade	receivable	taking	into	
account	payment	history,	payments	made	subsequent	to	year	end	and	prior	to	reporting,	past	default	experience	and	the	impact	of	
any	other	relevant	and	current	observable	data.	The	Group	applies	a	general	approach	on	all	other	receivables	classified	as	
financial	assets.	At	year	end,	the	Group	allowance	for	doubtful	debts	provided	against	trade	receivables	was	£140,000	(2020:	
£91,000).

18. INVESTMENTS IN LISTED SECURITIES HELD AT FVPL 

Market value of listed Investments:
Listed	in	Great	Britain
Listed	outside	Great	Britain

Original	cost	of	listed	investments

Unrealised	surplus	/	deficit	of	market	value	versus	cost

80 Bisichi	PLC

2021
£’000 

478
207

685

846

(161)

2020 
£’000	

567
266

833

1,098

(265)

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

19. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Trade	payables

Amounts	owed	to	joint	ventures

Lease	liabilities	(Note	31)

Other	payables

Accruals	
Deferred	Income

2021
£’000 

7,171

156

65

2,281

844
226

2020 
£’000	

7,168

156

81

1,839

1,374
238

10,743

10,856

20. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES – BORROWINGS

Current

Non-current

Bank	overdraft	(secured)
Bank	loan	(secured)

2021
£’000 

2,536
130

2,666

2020 
£’000	

4,846
264

5,110

Bank	overdraft	and	loan	instalments	by	reference	to	the	balance	sheet	date:

	 Within	one	year

	 From	one	to	two	years
	 From	two	to	five	years

Bank	overdraft	and	loan	analysis	by	origin:

	 United	Kingdom
	 Southern	Africa

2021
£’000 

-
3,853

3,853

2021
£’000 

2,666

11
3,842

6,519

3,839
2,680

6,519

2020 
£’000	

-
3,943

3,943

2020 
£’000	

5,110

128
3,815

9,053

3,799
5,254

9,053

In	South	Africa,	an	R85million	trade	facility	is	held	with	Absa	Bank	Limited	by	Sisonke	Coal	Processing	(Pty)	Limited	(“Sisonke	Coal	
Processing”)	in	order	to	cover	the	working	capital	requirements	of	the	Group’s	South	African	operations.	The	interest	cost	of	the	
loan	is	at	the	South	African	prime	lending	rate	plus	3.8%	The	facility	is	renewable	annually	each	January,	is	repayable	on	demand	
and	is	secured	by	way	of	a	first	charge	over	specific	pieces	of	mining	equipment,	inventory	and	the	debtors	of	the	relevant	
company	which	holds	the	loan	which	are	included	in	the	financial	statements	at	a	value	of	£8,843,219.	All	banking	covenants	were	
either	adhered	to	or	waived	by	Absa	Bank	Limited	during	the	year.	

In	the	UK,	the	Group	holds	a	£3.96million	term	loan	facility	with	Julian	Hodge	Bank	Limited.	The	loan	is	secured	against	the	
Group’s	UK	retail	property	portfolio.	The	debt	package	has	a	five	year	term	and	is	repayable	at	the	end	of	the	term	in	December	
2024.	In	the	last	quarter	of	2021	the	base	interest	rate	on	the	loan	changed	from	LIBOR	to	the	Bank	of	England	base	rate.	The	
overall	interest	cost	of	the	loan	is	4.00%	above	the	Bank	of	England	base	rate.	The	loan	is	secured	by	way	of	a	first	charge	over	
the	investment	properties	in	the	UK	which	are	included	in	the	financial	statements	at	a	value	of	£10,525,000.	No	banking	
covenants	were	breached	by	the	Group	during	the	year.

Bisichi	PLC

8181

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

20. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES – BORROWINGS CONTINUED
Consistent	with	others	in	the	mining	and	property	industry,	the	Group	monitors	its	capital	by	its	gearing	levels.	This	is	calculated	as	
the	total	bank	loans	and	overdraft	less	remaining	cash	and	cash	equivalents	as	a	percentage	of	equity.	At	year	end	the	gearing	of	
the	Group	was	calculated	as	follows:

2021
£’000 

6,519
(3,018)

3,501

17,512

20.0%

Bank 
borrowings	
£’000

Bank 
overdrafts
£’000

Lease	
liabilities
£’000

4,402

4,842

(56)

(139)

(330)

334

2021
£’000

9,561

(154)

(2,443)

9

-

-

6,973

4,207

4,846

262

(18)

(39)

303

508

2021
£’000 

1,442

(52)

-
-

2020 
£’000	

9,053
(3,768)

5,285

16,073

32.9%

2020
£’000

9,506

(404)

156

303

9,561

2020
£’000	

1,554

(112)

-
-

1,390

1,442

Total	bank	loans	and	overdraft
Less	cash	and	cash	equivalents	(excluding	overdraft)

Net debt

Total equity attributable to shareholders of the parent

Gearing

Analysis	of	the	changes	in	liabilities	arising	from	financing	activities:

Bank  
borrowings	
£’000

Bank  

overdrafts
£’000

Lease	
liabilities
£’000

Balance	at	1	January

Exchange	adjustments

Cash	movements	excluding	
exchange	adjustments
Additions	

4,207

(10)

(214)

4,846

(138)

(2,172)

-

-

Balance	at	31	December	

3,983

2,536

508

(6)

(57)

9

454

21. PROVISION FOR REHABILITATION

As	at	1	January

Exchange	adjustment

Increase	in	provision
Unwinding	of	discount

As	at	31	December

82 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Total financial assets and liabilities
The	Group’s	financial	assets	and	liabilities	are	as	follows,	representing	both	the	fair	value	and	the	carrying	value:

Financial 
Assets
measured	
at
amortised	
cost
£’000

Financial 
Liabilities
measured	
at
amortised	
cost
£’000

Cash	and	cash	equivalents

3,018

Non-current	other	
investments	held	at	FVPL

Investments	in	listed	
securities	held	at	FVPL		

- 

- 

Trade	and	other	receivables

8,379

-

-

-

-

Bank	borrowings	and	
overdraft

Lease	Liabilities
Other	liabilities

- 

- 
- 

11,397

(6,519)

(454)
(11,178)

(18,151)

Investments	 
held	at	
FVPL	
£’000

-

3,631

2021
£’000

3,018

3,631

685 

685

- 

- 

- 
- 

4,316

8,379

(6,519)

(454)
(11,178)

(2,438)

Financial 
Assets
measured	
at
amortised	
cost
£’000

3,768

- 

- 

6,787

Financial 
Liabilities
measured	
at
amortised	
cost
£’000

-

-

-

-

- 

- 
- 

(9,053)

(508)
(10,746)

Investments	 
held	at	
FVPL	
£’000

-

1,746

2020
£’000

3,768

1,746

833 

833

- 

- 

- 
- 

6,787

(9,053)

(508)
(10,746)

10,555

(20,307)

2,579

(7,173)

Investments	in	listed	securities	held	at	fair	value	through	profit	and	loss	fall	under	level	1	of	the	fair	value	hierarchy	into	which	fair	
value	measurements	are	recognised	in	accordance	with	the	levels	set	out	in	IFRS	7.	The	comparative	figures	for	2020	fall	under	
the	same	category	of	financial	instrument	as	2021.

The	carrying	amount	of	short	term	(less	than	12	months)	trade	receivable	and	other	liabilities	approximate	their	fair	values.	The	fair	
value	of	non-current	borrowings	in	note	20	approximates	its	carrying	value	and	was	determined	under	level	2	of	the	fair	value	
hierarchy	and	is	estimated	by	discounting	the	future	contractual	cash	flows	at	the	current	market	interest	rates	for	UK	borrowings	
and	for	the	South	African	overdraft	facility.	The	fair	value	of	the	lease	liabilities	in	note	31	approximates	its	carrying	value	and	was	
determined	under	level	2	of	the	fair	value	hierarchy	and	is	estimated	by	discounting	the	future	contractual	cash	flows	at	the	current	
market	interest	rates.

Treasury policy
Although	no	derivative	transactions	were	entered	into	during	the	current	and	prior	year,	the	Group	may	use	derivative	transactions	
such	as	interest	rate	swaps	and	forward	exchange	contracts	as	necessary	in	order	to	help	manage	the	financial	risks	arising	from	
the	Group’s	activities.	The	main	risks	arising	from	the	Group’s	financing	structure	are	interest	rate	risk,	liquidity	risk,	market	risk,	
credit	risk,	currency	risk	and	commodity	price	risk.	There	have	been	no	changes	during	the	year	of	the	main	risks	arising	from	the	
Group’s	finance	structure.	The	policies	for	managing	each	of	these	risks	and	the	principal	effects	of	these	policies	on	the	results	
are	summarised	below.

Interest rate risk 
Interest	rate	risk	is	the	risk	that	the	value	of	a	financial	instrument	or	cashflows	associated	with	the	instrument	will	fluctuate	due	to	
changes	in	market	interest	rates.	Interest	rate	risk	arises	from	interest	bearing	financial	assets	and	liabilities	that	the	Group	uses.	
Treasury	activities	take	place	under	procedures	and	policies	approved	and	monitored	by	the	Board	to	minimise	the	financial	risk	
faced	by	the	Group.	Interest	bearing	assets	comprise	cash	and	cash	equivalents	which	are	considered	to	be	short-term	liquid	
assets	and	loans	to	joint	ventures.

Bisichi	PLC

8383

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED
Interest	bearing	borrowings	comprise	bank	loans,	bank	overdrafts	and	variable	rate	finance	lease	obligations.	The	rates	of	interest	
vary	based	on	Bank	of	England	in	the	UK	and	PRIME	in	South	Africa.

As	at	31	December	2021,	with	other	variables	unchanged,	a	1%	increase	or	decrease	in	interest	rates,	on	investments	and	
borrowings	whose	interest	rates	are	not	fixed,	would	respectively	change	the	profit/loss	for	the	year	by	£80,000	(2020:	£37,000).	
The	effect	on	equity	of	this	change	would	be	an	equivalent	decrease	or	increase	for	the	year	of	£80,000	(2020:	£37,000).	

Liquidity risk 
The	Group’s	policy	is	to	minimise	refinancing	risk.	Efficient	treasury	management	and	strict	credit	control	minimise	the	costs	and	
risks	associated	with	this	policy	which	ensures	that	funds	are	available	to	meet	commitments	as	they	fall	due.	As	at	year	end	the	
Group	held	borrowing	facilities	in	the	UK	in	Bisichi	PLC	and	in	South	Africa	in	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd.

The	following	table	sets	out	the	maturity	profile	of	contractual	undiscounted	cash	flows	of	financial	liabilities	as	at	31	December:

Within	one	year

From	one	to	two	years

From	two	to	five	years
Beyond	five	years

2021
£’000 

14,122

238

4,391
129

2020 
£’000	

16,174

371

4,268
232

18,880

21,045

The	following	table	sets	out	the	maturity	profile	of	contractual	undiscounted	cash	flows	of	financial	liabilities	as	at	31	December	
maturing	within	one	year:

Within	one	month

From	one	to	three	months
From	four	to	twelve	months

2021
£’000 

11,509

1,699
914

14,122

2020 
£’000	

13,088

2,106
980

16,174

In	South	Africa,	an	R85million	trade	facility	is	held	with	Absa	Bank	Limited	by	Sisonke	Coal	Processing	(Pty)	Limited	(“Sisonke	Coal	
Processing”)	in	order	to	cover	the	working	capital	requirements	of	the	Group’s	South	African	operations.	The	interest	cost	of	the	
loan	is	at	the	South	African	prime	lending	rate	plus	3.8%	The	facility	is	renewable	annually	each	January,	is	repayable	on	demand	
and	is	secured	against	inventory,	debtors	and	cash	that	are	held	by	Sisonke	Coal	Processing	(Pty)	Limited.	The	facility	is	included	
in	cash	and	cash	equivalents	within	the	cashflow	statement.	

In	the	UK,	the	Group	holds	a	£3.96million	term	loan	facility	with	Julian	Hodge	Bank	Limited.	The	loan	is	secured	against	the	
Group’s	UK	retail	property	portfolio.	The	debt	package	has	a	five	year	term	and	is	repayable	at	the	end	of	the	term	in	December	
2024.	In	the	last	quarter	of	2021	the	base	interest	rate	on	the	loan	changed	from	LIBOR	to	the	Bank	of	England	base	rate.	The	
overall	interest	cost	of	the	loan	is	4.00%	above	the	Bank	of	England	base	rate.

As	a	result	of	the	above	agreed	banking	facilities,	the	Directors	believe	that	the	Group	is	well	placed	to	manage	its	liquidity	risk.	

84 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED

Credit risk 
The	Group	is	mainly	exposed	to	credit	risk	on	its	cash	and	cash	equivalents,	trade	and	other	receivables	and	amounts	owed	by	
joint	ventures	as	per	the	balance	sheet.	The	maximum	exposure	to	credit	risk	is	represented	by	the	carrying	amount	of	each	
financial	asset	in	the	balance	sheet	which	at	year	end	amounted	to	£11,397,000	(2020:	£10,555,000).	

To	mitigate	risk	on	its	cash	and	cash	equivalents,	the	Group	only	deposits	surplus	cash	with	well-established	financial	institutions	
of	high	quality	credit	standing.

The	Group’s	credit	risk	is	primarily	attributable	to	its	trade	receivables.	Trade	debtor’s	credit	ratings	are	reviewed	regularly.	The	Group’s	
review	includes	measures	such	as	the	use	of	external	ratings	and	establishing	purchase	limits	for	each	customer.	The	Group	had	
amounts	due	from	its	significant	revenue	customers	at	the	year	end	that	represented	53%	(2020:	68%)	of	the	trade	receivables	
balance.	These	amounts	have	been	subsequently	settled.	The	Group	approach	to	measure	the	credit	loss	allowance	for	trade	
receivables	is	outlined	in	note	17.	At	year	end,	the	Group	allowance	for	doubtful	debts	provided	against	trade	receivables	was	£140,000	
(2020:	£91,000).	As	at	year	end	the	amount	of	trade	receivables	held	past	due	date	less	credit	loss	allowances	was	£201,000	(2020:	
£282,000).	To	date,	the	amount	of	trade	receivables	held	past	due	date	less	credit	loss	allowances	that	has	not	subsequently	been	
settled	is	£106,000	(2020:	£155,000).	Management	have	no	reason	to	believe	that	this	amount	will	not	be	settled.		

The	Group	exposure	to	credit	risk	on	its	loans	to	joint	ventures	and	other	receivables	is	mitigated	through	ongoing	review	of	the	
underlying	performance	and	resources	of	the	counterparty	including	evaluation	of	different	scenarios	of	probability	of	default	and	
expected	loss	applicable	to	each	of	the	underlying	balances.

Financial assets maturity 
On	31	December	2021,	cash	at	bank	and	in	hand	amounted	to	£3,018,000	(2020:	£3,768,000)	which	is	invested	in	short	term	bank	deposits	
maturing	within	one	year	bearing	interest	at	the	bank’s	variable	rates.	Cash	and	cash	equivalents	all	have	a	maturity	of	less	than	3	months.

Foreign exchange risk 
All	trading	is	undertaken	in	the	local	currencies	except	for	certain	export	sales	which	are	invoiced	in	dollars.	It	is	not	the	Group’s	
policy	to	obtain	forward	contracts	to	mitigate	foreign	exchange	risk	on	these	contracts	as	payment	terms	are	within	15	days	of	
invoice	or	earlier.	Funding	is	also	in	local	currencies	other	than	inter-company	investments	and	loans	and	it	is	also	not	the	Group’s	
policy	to	obtain	forward	contracts	to	mitigate	foreign	exchange	risk	on	these	amounts.	During	2021	and	2020	the	Group	did	not	
hedge	its	exposure	of	foreign	investments	held	in	foreign	currencies.	

The	principal	currency	risk	to	which	the	Group	is	exposed	in	regard	to	inter-company	balances	is	the	exchange	rate	between	
Pounds	sterling	and	South	African	Rand.	It	arises	as	a	result	of	the	retranslation	of	Rand	denominated	inter-company	trade	
receivable	balances	held	within	the	UK	which	are	payable	by	South	African	Rand	functional	currency	subsidiaries.	

Based	on	the	Group’s	net	financial	assets	and	liabilities	as	at	31	December	2021,	a	25%	strengthening	of	Sterling	against	the	
South	African	Rand,	with	all	other	variables	held	constant,	would	decrease	the	Group’s	profit	after	taxation	by	£218,000	(2020:	
£360,000).	A	25%	weakening	of	Sterling	against	the	South	African	Rand,	with	all	other	variables	held	constant	would	increase	the	
Group’s	profit	after	taxation	by	£364,000	(2020:	£601,000).	

The	25%	sensitivity	has	been	determined	based	on	the	average	historic	volatility	of	the	exchange	rate.	

The	table	below	shows	the	currency	profiles	of	cash	and	cash	equivalents:

Sterling

South	African	Rand
US	Dollar

2021
£’000 

1,397

1,017
604

3,018

2020 
£’000	

1,641

809
1,318

3,768

Cash	and	cash	equivalents	earn	interest	at	rates	based	on	Bank	of	England	rates	in	Sterling	and	Prime	in	Rand.

Bisichi	PLC

8585

	
Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED
The	tables	below	shows	the	currency	profiles	of	net	monetary	assets	and	liabilities	by	functional	currency	of	the	Group:

2021:

Sterling

South	African	Rand
US	Dollar

2020:

Sterling

South	African	Rand
US	Dollar

23. DEFERRED TAXATION

As	at	1	January	

Recognised	in	income
Exchange	adjustment

As	at	31	December

The	deferred	tax	balance	comprises	the	following:

Revaluations

Capital	allowances

Short	term	timing	difference

Unredeemed	capital	deductions
Losses	and	other	deductions

Sterling
£’000 

1,123

65
1,462

2,650

Sterling
£’000 

(70)

39
1,736

1,705

2021  
£’000

474

45
(13)

506

641

2,253

(832)

(1,057)
(499)

506

South  
African
Rands 
£’000 

-

(5,088)
-

(5,088)

South  
African
Rands 
£’000 

-

(8,878)
-

(8,878)

2020  
£’000

2,071

(1,416)
(181)

474

299

2,478

(692)

(645)
(966)

474

Refer	to	note	8	for	details	of	deferred	tax	recognised	in	income	in	the	current	year.	Tax	rates	of	25%	(2020:	19%)	in	the	UK	and	
28%	(2020:	28%)	in	South	Africa	were	utilised	to	calculate	year	end	deferred	tax	balances.

86 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

24. SHARE CAPITAL

Authorised:	13,000,000	ordinary	shares	of	10p	each

Allotted	and	fully	paid:

At	1	January	and	outstanding	at	31	December

25. OTHER RESERVES

Equity	share	options
Net	investment	premium	on	share	capital	in	joint	venture

2021
Number of 
ordinary
shares

2020
Number	of	
ordinary
shares

10,676,839

10,676,839

2021
£’000 

1,300

2020 
£’000	

1,300

2021
£’000

1,068

2021
£’000 

621
86

707

2020
£’000

1,068

2020 
£’000	

621
86

707

26. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
Details	of	the	share	option	scheme	are	shown	in	the	Directors’	remuneration	report	on	page	33	under	the	heading	Share	option	
schemes	which	is	within	the	audited	part	of	this	report.	Further	details	of	the	share	option	schemes	are	set	out	below.	

The	Bisichi	PLC	Unapproved	Option	Schemes:

Subscription
price per share

Period within 
which options
exercisable

Number	of	share
for	which	options
outstanding	at
31	December	2020

Number	of	
share	options	
lapsed/surrendered
/awarded
during	year

Number of  
share for which 
options
outstanding at
31 December 2021

87.0p
73.50p

Sep 2015 – Sep 2025 
Feb 2018 – Feb 2028

300,000
380,000

-
-

300,000
380,000

Year of grant

2015
2018

There	are	no	performance	or	service	conditions	attached	to	2015	and	2018	options	which	are	outstanding	at	31	December	2021.	

Bisichi	PLC

8787

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

26. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS CONTINUED

Outstanding	at	1	January

Lapsed/Surrendered	during	the	year
Issued	during	the	year

Outstanding	at	31	December

Exercisable at 31 December

27. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

As	at	1	January

Share	of	profit/(loss)	for	the	year

Dividends	paid
Exchange	adjustment

As	at	31	December

2021
Weighted
average
exercise 
price

79.46p

-
-

2021
Number

680,000

-
-

2020
Number

680,000

-
-

680,000

680,000

79.46p

79.46p

680,000

680,000

2021
£’000 

116

215

-
(8)

323

2020
Weighted
average
exercise	
price

79.46p

-
-

79.46p

79.46p

2020 
£’000	

625

(440)

-
(69)

116

The	non-controlling	interest	comprises	of	a	37.5%	interest	in	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	and	its	wholly	owned	subsidiary	
Sisonke	Coal	Processing	(Pty)	Ltd.	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	is	a	coal	mining	company	and	Sisonke	Coal	Processing	(Pty)	Ltd	
is	a	coal	processing	company	both	incorporated	in	South	Africa.	Summarised	financial	information	reflecting	100%	of	the	
underlying	consolidated	relevant	figures	of	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd’s	and	its	wholly	owned	subsidiary	Sisonke	Coal	
Processing	(Pty)	Ltd	is	set	out	below.	

Revenue
Expenses

Profit/(loss) for the year
Other	comprehensive	Income

Total comprehensive income for the year

Balance	sheet

	 Non-current	assets

	 Current	assets

	 Current	liabilities
	 Non-current	liabilities

Net assets at 31 December

88 Bisichi	PLC

2021
£’000 

49,225
(47,787)

1,438

-

1,438

9,019

9,329

(14,287)
(1,904)

2,157

2020
£’000

28,555
(31,498)

(2,943)

-

(2,943)

10,130

9,781

(16,915)
(2,224)

772

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

27. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST CONTINUED
The	non-controlling	interest	originates	from	the	disposal	of	a	37.5%	shareholding	in	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	in	2010	when	
the	total	issued	share	capital	in	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	was	increased	from	136	shares	to	1,000	shares	at	par	of	R1	(South	
African	Rand)	through	the	following	shares	issue:

-	 	a	subscription	for	489	ordinary	shares	at	par	by	Bisichi	Mining	(Exploration)	Limited	increasing	the	number	of	shares	held	from	

136	ordinary	shares	to	a	total	of	625	ordinary	shares;

-	 a	subscription	for	110	ordinary	shares	at	par	by	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd;

-	 a	subscription	for	265	“A”	shares	at	par	by	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd

Bisichi	Mining	(Exploration)	Limited	is	a	wholly	owned	subsidiary	of	Bisichi	PLC	incorporated	in	England	and	Wales.	

Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd	is	a	South	African	Black	Economic	Empowerment	company	and	minority	shareholder	in	Black	Wattle	
Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd.	

The	“A”	shares	rank	pari	passu	with	the	ordinary	shares	save	that	they	will	have	no	dividend	rights	until	such	time	as	the	dividends	
paid	by	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	on	the	ordinary	shares	subsequent	to	30	October	2008	will	equate	to	R832,075,000.

A	non-controlling	interest	of	15%	in	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	is	recognised	for	all	profits	distributable	to	the	110	ordinary	
shares	held	by	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd	from	the	date	of	issue	of	the	shares	(18	October	2010).	An	additional	non-controlling	
interest	will	be	recognised	for	all	profits	distributable	to	the	265	“A”	shares	held	by	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd	after	such	time	as	the	
profits	available	for	distribution,	in	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd,	before	any	payment	of	dividends	after	30	October	2008,	exceeds	
R832,075,000.

On	12	April	2022	the	total	issued	share	capital	in	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	was	increased	further	from	1000	shares	to	1002	
shares	at	par	of	R1	through	the	following	share	issue:

	a	subscription	of	1	“B”	Share	at	par	by	Bisichi	Mining	(Exploration	Limited);

	a	subscription	of	1	“B”	Share	at	par	by	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd

The	“B”	shares	rank	pari	passu	with	the	ordinary	shares	save	that	they	have	sole	rights	to	the	distributable	profits	attributable	to	
certain	mining	reserves	held	by	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd.	A	non-controlling	interest	is	recognised	for	all	profits	distributable	to	
the	“B”	shares	held	by	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd	from	the	date	of	issue	of	the	shares	(12	April	2022).		

Bisichi	PLC

8989

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

28. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related party:
London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC	(note	(a))

West	Ealing	Projects	Limited	(note	(b))

Dragon	Retail	Properties	Limited	(note	(c))
Development	Physics	Limited	(note	(d))

As at 31 December 2021

London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC	(note	(a))

West	Ealing	Projects	Limited	(note	(b))
Dragon	Retail	Properties	Limited	(note	(c))

As at 31 December 2020

At	31	December

During	the	year

Amounts	
owed
to	related	
party
£’000

Amounts	
owed
by	related	
party
£’000

Costs 
recharged
(to)/by	
related
party
£’000

Cash	paid	
(to)/by	
related
party
£’000

41

-

156
-

197

43

-
156

199

-

(998)

-
(67)

(1,065)

-

(952)
-

(952)

200

-

(36)
-

164

200

-
(36)

164

(192)

(158)

44
(67)

(373)

(190)

(112)
44

(258)

(a)   London & Associated Properties PLC	–	London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC	(“LAP”)	is	a	substantial	shareholder	and	parent	

company	of	Bisichi	PLC.	Property	management,	office	premises,	general	management,	accounting	and	administration	services	
are	provided	for	Bisichi	PLC	and	its	UK	subsidiaries.	Bisichi	PLC	continues	to	operate	as	a	fully	independent	company	and	
currently	LAP	owns	only	41.52%	of	the	issued	ordinary	share	capital.	However,	LAP	is	deemed	under	IFRS	10	to	have	
effective	control	of	Bisichi	PLC	for	accounting	purposes.

(b)   West Ealing Projects Limited –	West	Ealing	Projects	Limited	(“West	Ealing”)	is	an	unlisted	property	company	incorporated	in	

England	and	Wales.	West	Ealing	is	owned	equally	by	the	company	and	London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC	and	is	accounted	
as	a	joint	venture	and	treated	as	a	non-current	asset	investment.

(c)   Dragon Retail Properties Limited	–	(“Dragon”)	is	owned	equally	by	the	company	and	London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC.	

Dragon	is	accounted	as	a	joint	venture	and	is	treated	as	a	non-current	asset	investment.	

(d)   Development Physics Limited	–	Development	Physics	Limited	(“DP”)	is	an	unlisted	property	company	incorporated	in	England	
and	Wales.	DP	is	owned	equally	by	the	company,	London	&	Associated	Properties	PLC	and	Metroprop	Real	Estate	Ltd	and	is	
accounted	as	a	joint	venture	and	treated	as	a	non-current	asset	investment.

Key	management	personnel	comprise	of	the	directors	of	the	company	who	have	the	authority	and	responsibility	for	planning,	
directing,	and	controlling	the	activities	of	the	company.	Details	of	key	management	personnel	compensation	and	interest	in	share	
options	are	shown	in	the	Directors’	Remuneration	Report	on	pages	32	and	33	under	the	headings	Directors’	remuneration,	Pension	
schemes	and	incentives	and	Share	option	schemes	which	is	within	the	audited	part	of	this	report.	The	total	employers’	national	
insurance	paid	in	relation	to	the	remuneration	of	key	management	was	£189,000	(2020:	£97,000).	In	2012	a	loan	was	made	to	one	
of	the	directors,	Mr	A	R	Heller,	for	£116,000.	Interest	is	payable	on	the	Director’s	Loan	at	a	rate	of	6.14	per	cent.	There	is	no	fixed	
repayment	date	for	the	Director’s	Loan.	The	loan	amount	outstanding	at	year	end	was	£41,000	(2020:	£41,000)	and	no	repayment	
(2020:	£nil)	was	made	during	the	year.

90 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

28. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS CONTINUED
The	non-controlling	interest	to	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd	is	shown	in	note	27.	In	addition,	the	Group	holds	an	investment	in	Vunani	
Limited	with	a	fair	value	of	£45,000	(2020:	£38,000)	and	an	investment	in	Vunani	Capital	Partners	(Pty)	Ltd	of	£38,000	(2020:	
£nil).	Both	are	related	parties	to	Vunani	Mining	(Pty)	Ltd	and	are	classified	as	non-current	available	for	sale	investments.

29. EMPLOYEES

Staff	costs	during	the	year	were	as	follows:

Salaries

Social	security	costs

Pension	costs
Share	based	payments

The	average	weekly	numbers	of	employees	of	the	Group	during	the	year	were	as	follows:

Production
Administration

30. CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

Commitments	for	capital	expenditure	approved	and	contracted	for	at	the	year	end

2021
£’000 

6,995

189

307
-

7,491

2021

214
15

229

2021
£’000 

-

2020
£’000	

5,512

97

281
-

5,890

2020

221
15

236

2020 
£’000	

485

Bisichi	PLC

9191

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

31. LEASE LIABILITIES AND FUTURE PROPERTY LEASE RENTALS
The	lease	liabilities	are	secured	by	the	related	underlying	assets.	The	undiscounted	maturity	analysis	of	lease	payments	at	31	
December	2021	is	as	follows:

Within	one	year

Second	to	fifth	year
After	five	years

Discounting	adjustment

Present	value

Mining	
Equipment	&	
Development	
costs
£’000

Motor	Vehi-
cles
£’000

Head	
Lease	Prop-
erty
£’000

42

161
91

294
(62)

232

28

21
-

49
(2)

47

13

44
1,336

1,393
(1,218)

175

The	present	value	of	minimum	lease	payments	at	31	December	2021	is	as	follows:

Within	one	year		(Note	19)

Second	to	fifth	year
After	five	years

Present	value

Mining	
Equipment	&	
Development	
costs
£’000

Motor	Vehi-
cles
£’000

Head	
Lease	Prop-
erty
£’000

27

205
-

232

27

20
-

47

11

35
129

175

2021
£’000

83

226
1,427

1,736
(1,282)

454

2021
£’000

65

260
129

454

2020
£’000

84

236
1,680

2,000
(1,492)

508

2020
£’000

81

195
232

508

With	the	exception	of	short-term	leases	and	leases	of	low-value	underlying	assets,	each	lease	is	reflected	on	the	balance	sheet	as	
a	right-of-use	asset	and	a	lease	liability.	The	Group	classifies	its	right-of-use	assets	in	a	consistent	manner	to	its	property,	plant	
and	equipment.	Lease	liabilities	due	within	one	year	are	classified	within	trade	and	other	payables	in	the	balance	sheet.	

The	Group	has	one	lease	for	mining	equipment	in	South	Africa	and	one	lease	for	motor	vehicles	in	the	United	Kingdom.	Both	
leases	have	terms	of	less	than	5	years	are	either	non-cancellable	or	may	only	be	cancelled	by	incurring	a	substantive	termination	
fee.	Lease	payments	for	mining	equipment	are	subject	to	changes	in	consumer	price	inflation	in	South	Africa.	

The	Group	has	one	lease	contract	for	an	investment	property.	The	remaining	term	for	the	leased	investment	property	is	127	years	
(2020:	128	years).	The annual	rent	payable	is	the	higher	of	£7,500	or	6.25%	of	the	revenue	derived	from	the	leased	assets.

The	Group	has	entered	into	rental	leases	on	its	investment	property	portfolio	consisting	mainly	of	commercial	properties.	These	
leases	have	terms	of	between	1	and	106	years.	All	leases	include	a	clause	to	enable	upward	revision	of	the	rental	charge	on	an	
annual	basis	according	to	prevailing	market	conditions.

92 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

31. LEASE LIABILITIES AND FUTURE PROPERTY LEASE RENTALS CONTINUED
The	future	aggregate	minimum	rentals	receivable	under	non-cancellable	operating	leases	are	as	follows:

Within	one	year

Second	year

Third	year

Fourth	year

Fifth	year
After	five	years

2021
£’000 

948

830

776

710

634
9,956

13,854

2020 
£’000	

814

711

590

536

471
9,562

12,684

32. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS

Bank Guarantees
Bank	guarantees	have	been	issued	by	the	bankers	of	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Limited	on	behalf	of	the	company	to	third	parties.	
The guarantees	are	secured	against	the	assets	of	the	company	and	have	been	issued	in	respect	of	the	following:

Rail	siding

Rehabilitation	of	mining	land
Water	&	electricity

2021
£’000 

48

1,700
46

2020 
£’000	

50

1,441
48

Contingent tax liability
The	interpretation	of	laws	and	regulations	in	South	Africa	where	the	Group	operates	can	be	complex	and	can	lead	to	challenges	
from	or	disputes	with	regulatory	authorities.	Such	situations	often	take	significant	time	to	resolve.	Where	there	is	a	dispute	and	
where	a	reliable	estimate	of	the	potential	liability	cannot	be	made,	or	where	the	Group,	based	on	legal	advice,	considers	that	it	is	
improbable	that	there	will	be	an	outflow	of	economic	resources,	no	provision	is	recognised.

Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	is	currently	involved	in	a	tax	dispute	in	South	Africa	related	to	VAT.	The	dispute	arose	during	the	 
year	ended	31	December	2020	and	is	related	to	events	which	occurred	prior	to	the	years	ended	31	December	2020.	As	at	13	April	 
2022,	the	Group	has	been	advised	that	it	has	a	strong	legal	case,	that	it	has	complied	fully	with	the	legislation	and,	therefore,	no	
economic	outflow	is	expected	to	occur.	Because	of	the	nature	and	complexity	of	the	dispute,	the	possible	financial	effect	of	a	
negative	decision	cannot	be	measured	reliably.	Accordingly,	no	provision	has	been	booked	at	the	year	end.	At	this	stage,	the	 
Group	believes	that	the	dispute	will	be	resolved	in	its	favour.		

Bisichi	PLC

9393

Financial statements
Company balance sheet
at 31 December 2021

Fixed assets
Tangible	assets

Investment	in	joint	ventures
Other	investments

Current assets
Debtors	–	amounts	due	within	one	year

Debtors	–	amounts	due	in	more	than	one	year
Bank balances

Creditors	–	amounts	falling	due	within	one	year

Net current assets

Total assets less current liabilities
Creditors	–	amounts	falling	in	more	than	one	year

Net assets

Capital and reserves
Called	up	share	capital

Share	premium	account

Available	for	sale	reserve

Other	reserves
Retained	earnings

Shareholders’ funds

Notes

35

36
36

37

37

38

38

24

33

2021
£’000

93

665
9,987

10,745

3,636

220
788

4,644

(454)

4,190

14,935

(20)

14,915

1,068

258

-

622
12,967

14,915

2020
£’000

90

665
8,102

8,857

4,782

248
1,810

6,840

(563)

6,277

15,134

(16)

15,118

1,068

258

-

622
13,170

15,118

The	loss	for	the	financial	year,	before	dividends,	was	£203,000	(2020:	profit	£83,000)

The	company	financial	statements	were	approved	and	authorised	for	issue	by	the	board	of	directors	on	13	April	2022	and	signed	
on	its	behalf by:

A R Heller 
Director	

G J Casey 
Director

94 Bisichi	PLC

                     Company Registration No. 112155 

 
 
	
Financial statements
Company statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 31 December 2021

Balance	at	1	January	2020

Dividend	paid
Profit	and	total	comprehensive	income	for	the	year

Balance at 1 January 2021
Dividend	paid
Profit	and	total	comprehensive	income	for	the	year

Balance at 31 December 2021

Share	
capital
£’000

1,068

-
-

1,068
-
-

1,068

Share	
premium
£’000

258

-
-

258
-
-

258

Other
reserve
£’000

622

Retained
earnings
£’000

Shareholders
funds
£’000

13,194

15,142

-
-

622
-
-

622

(107)
83

13,170
-
(203)

12,967

(107)
83

15,118
-
(203)

14,915

Bisichi	PLC

9595

Notes to the financial statements

Financial statements
Company accounting policies
for the year ended 31 December 2021

The following are the main accounting 
policies of the company: 

•   •   the disclosure of the remuneration of 

key management personnel; and

Basis of preparation

The financial statements have been 
prepared in accordance with Financial 
Reporting Standard 100 Application of 
Financial Reporting Requirements and 
Financial Reporting Standard 101 
Reduced Disclosure Framework. The 
principal accounting policies adopted in 
the preparation of the financial 
statements are set out below.

The financial statements have been 
prepared on a historical cost basis, except 
for the revaluation of leasehold property 
and certain financial instruments.

Going concern 
Details on the Group’s adoption of the 
going concern basis of accounting in 
preparing the annual financial statements 
can be found on page 60.

Disclosure exemptions adopted
In preparing these financial statements 
the company has taken advantage of all 
disclosure exemptions conferred by FRS 
101 as well as disclosure exemptions 
conferred by IFRS 2, 7, 13 and 16. 

Therefore these financial statements do 
not include:

•   •   certain comparative information as 

otherwise required by IFRS;

•   •   certain disclosures regarding the 

company’s capital;

•   •   a statement of cash flows;

•   •   the effect of future accounting 
standards not yet adopted;

96 Bisichi PLC

•   •   disclosure of related party transactions 

with the company’s wholly owned 
subsidiaries.

In addition, and in accordance with FRS 
101, further disclosure exemptions have 
been adopted because equivalent 
disclosures are included in the company’s 
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Dividends received 
Dividends are credited to the profit and 
loss account when received.

Depreciation 
Provision for depreciation on tangible 
fixed assets is made in equal annual 
instalments to write each item off over its 
useful life. The rates generally used are: 

Office equipment  

10 – 33 percent

Joint ventures
Investments in joint ventures, being those 
entities over whose activities the Group 
has joint control as established by 
contractual agreement, are included at 
cost, less impairment.

Other Investments 
Investments of the company in 
subsidiaries are stated in the balance 
sheet as fixed assets at cost less 
provisions for impairment. 

Other investments comprising of shares 
in listed companies are classified at fair 
value through profit and loss. 

Foreign currencies  
Monetary assets and liabilities expressed 
in foreign currencies have been 
translated at the rates of exchange ruling 
at the balance sheet date. All exchange 
differences are taken to the profit and 
loss account.

Financial instruments 
Details on the Group’s accounting policy 
for financial instruments can be found on 
page 65. 

Deferred taxation 
Details on the Group’s accounting policy 
for deferred taxation can be found on 
page 67. 

Leased assets and liabilities
Details on the Group’s accounting policy 
for leased assets and liabilities can be 
found on page 66. 

Pensions
Details on the Group’s accounting policy 
for pensions can be found on page 65. 

Share based remuneration
Details on the Group’s accounting policy 
for share based remuneration can be 
found on page 65. Details of the share 
options in issue are disclosed in the 
directors’ remuneration report on page 
33 under the heading share option 
schemes which is within the audited part 
of this report.

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

33. PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT
A	separate	profit	and	loss	account	for	Bisichi	PLC	has	not	been	presented	as	permitted	by	Section	408(2)	of	the	Companies	Act	
2006.	The	loss	for	the	financial	year,	before	dividends	paid,	was	£203,000	(2020:	profit:	£83,000)

Details	of	share	capital	are	set	out	in	note	24	of	the	Group	financial	statements	and	details	of	the	share	options	are	shown	in	the	
Directors’	Remuneration	Report	on	page	33	under	the	heading	Share	option	schemes	which	is	within	the	audited	part	of	this	report	
and	note	26	of	the	Group	financial	statements.

34. DIVIDENDS
Details	on	dividends	can	be	found	in	note	9	in	the	Group	financial	statements.

35. TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS

Cost	at	1	January	2021
Additions

Cost at 31 December 2021

Accumulated	depreciation	at	1	January	2021
Charge	for	the	year

Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 2021

Net book value at 31 December 2021
Net	book	value	at	31	December	2020

Leasehold	
Property
£’000

Motor	
Vehicles
£’000

Office
equipment
£’000

45
-

45

-
-

-

45
45

69
35

104

24
32

56

48
45

70
-

70

70
-

70

-
-

Total
£’000

184
35

219

94
32

126

93

90

Leasehold	property	consists	of	a	single	unit	with	a	long	leasehold	tenant.	The	term	remaining	on	the	lease	is	38	years.	Motor	
Vehicles	comprise	wholly	of	Right	of	Use	leased	assets.	

36. INVESTMENTS

Net	book	value	at	1	January	2021

Invested	during	the	year

Repayment
Unrealised	surplus/deficit	over	cost

Net book value at 31 December 2021

Joint 
ventures
shares
£’000

Shares	in	
subsidiaries
£’000

Other	
investments
£’000

665

6,356

-

-
-

-

-
-

665

6,356

1,746

1,630

(446)
701

3,631

Total
£’000

8,102

1,630

(446)
701

9,987

Investments	in	subsidiaries	are	detailed	in	note	15.	In	the	opinion	of	the	directors	the	aggregate	value	of	the	investment	in	
subsidiaries	is	not	less	than	the	amount	shown	in	these	financial	statements.

Other	investments	comprise	of	£3,631,000	(2020:	£1,746,000)	shares	in	listed	companies.

Bisichi	PLC

9797

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

37. DEBTORS

Amounts due within one year:
Amounts	due	from	subsidiary	undertakings

Other	debtors

Joint	venture
Prepayments	and	accrued	income

Amounts due in more than one year:
Deferred	taxation

2021
£’000 

2020 
£’000	

2,421

94

1,065
56

3,636

220

220

3,709

85

952
36

4,782

248

248

Amounts	due	within	one	year	are	held	at	amortised	cost.	The	Group	applies	a	simplified	approach	to	measure	the	loss	allowance	
for	trade	receivables	using	the	lifetime	expected	loss	provision.	The	Group	applies	a	general	approach	on	all	other	receivables.	The	
general	approach	recognises	lifetime	expected	credit	losses	when	there	has	been	a	significant	increase	in	credit	risk	since	initial	
recognition.	The	company	has	reviewed	and	assessed	the	underlying	performance	and	resources	of	its	counterparties	including	its	
subsidiary	undertakings	and	joint	ventures.	

38. CREDITORS

Amounts falling due within one year:
Joint	venture

Other	taxation	and	social	security

Other	creditors

Lease	Liabilities
Accruals	and	deferred	income

Amounts falling due in more than one year:
Lease	Liabilities

2021
£’000 

2020 
£’000	

156

64

164

26
44

454

20

156

63

188

29
127

563

16

Lease	liabilities	comprise	of	leases	on	Motor	vehicles	with	remaining	leases	of	1-3	years.	With	the	exception	of	short-term	leases	
and	leases	of	low-value	underlying	assets,	each	lease	is	reflected	on	the	balance	sheet	as	a	right-of-use	asset	and	a	lease	liability.	

98 Bisichi	PLC

Financial statements Notes to the financial statements

39. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

At	31	December

Related party:
Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	(note	(a))
Ninghi	Marketing	Limited	(note	(b))

As at 31 December 2021

Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	(note	(a))
Ninghi	Marketing	Limited	(note	(b))

As at 31 December 2020 

At	31	 
December

Amounts	owed
by	related	party
£’000

During	the	year

Costs  

recharged	/
accrued	(to)/	
by	related	
party
£’000

Cash	paid	
(to)/	by	
related	party
£’000

(637)
(102)

(739)

(1,331)
(102)

(1,433)

(923)
-

(923)

(958)
-

(958)

1,617
-

1,617

-
-

-

(a)  Black Wattle Colliery (Pty) Ltd	–	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	is	a	coal	mining	company	based	in	South	Africa.	
(b)  Ninghi Marketing Limited	–	Ninghi	Marketing	Limited	is	a	dormant	coal	marketing	company	incorporated	in	England	&	Wales.	

Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	and	NInghi	Marketing	Limited	are	subsidiaries	of	the	company.

In	addition	to	the	above,	the	company	has	issued	a	company	guarantee	of	R20,061,917	(2020:	R20,061,917)	(South	African	Rand)	
to	the	bankers	of	Black	Wattle	Colliery	(Pty)	Ltd	in	order	to	cover	bank	guarantees	issued	to	third	parties	in	respect	of	the	
rehabilitation	of	mining	land.

A	provision	of	£102,000	has	been	raised	against	the	amount	owing	by	Ninghi	Marketing	Limited	in	prior	years	as	the	company	is	dormant.

In	2012	a	loan	was	made	to	one	of	the	directors,	Mr	A	R	Heller,	for	£116,000.	Further	details	on	the	loan	can	be	found	in	Note	28	of	
the	Group	financial	statements.	

Under	FRS	101,	the	company	has	taken	advantage	of	the	exemption	from	disclosing	transactions	with	other	wholly	owned	Group	
companies.	Details	of	other	related	party	transactions	are	given	in	note	28	of	the	Group	financial	statements.

41. EMPLOYEES

The	average	weekly	numbers	of	employees	of	the	company	during	the	year	were	as	follows:
Directors	&	administration

Staff	costs	during	the	year	were	as	follows:

Salaries

Social	security	costs

Pension	costs
Share	based	payments

2021
£’000 

2020
£’000	

5

1,426

189

31
-

1,646

5

758

97

28
-

883

Bisichi	PLC

9999