UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period to
Commission File No. 001-36629
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
46-3656781
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
100 West Liberty Street, 12th Floor
Reno, Nevada 89501
(Address of principal executive offices)
Telephone: (775) 328-0100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, $.00001, par value
Trading symbol
CZR
Name of each exchange on which registered
NASDAQ Stock Market
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
☒
☐
Accelerated filer
Emerging growth company
☐
☐
Non-accelerated filer
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $3.6 billion at June 30, 2020 based upon the closing price for the shares of
CZR’s common stock as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market.
As of February 22, 2021, there were 208,277,434 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, net of treasury shares.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the Registrant’s Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. Such Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120
days after the conclusion of the Registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Market for Registrants’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Part I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Part II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Part III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Part IV
Item 15.
EXHIBITS
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Financial Statement Schedules
2
Page
3
14
26
26
28
28
29
30
31
57
58
58
58
61
62
62
62
62
62
63
64
69
70
Item 1. Business.
PART I
Caesars Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (“ERI” or “Eldorado”), is referred to as the “Company,”
“CEI,” “Caesars,” or the “Registrant,” and together with its subsidiaries may also be referred to as “we,” “us” or “our.”
We also refer to (i) our Consolidated Financial Statements as our “Financial Statements,” (ii) our Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as our “Statements of Operations,” (iii) our Consolidated Balance Sheets as our “Balance
Sheets,” and (iv) our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as our “Statements of Cash Flows.” References to numbered “Notes” refer to Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.
Overview
We are a geographically diversified gaming and hospitality company that was founded in 1973 by the Carano family with the opening of the Eldorado
Hotel Casino in Reno, Nevada. Our primary source of revenue is generated by gaming operations, and we utilize our hotels, restaurants, bars,
entertainment, racing, sportsbook offerings, retail shops and other services to attract customers to our properties.
We lease certain real property assets from third parties, including GLP Capital, L.P., the operating partnership of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(“GLPI”) and VICI Properties L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“VICI”).
Significant Transactions in 2020
On July 20, 2020, we completed the merger with Caesars Entertainment Corporation (“Former Caesars”) pursuant to which Former Caesars became our
wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, we currently own, lease or manage an aggregate of 54 domestic properties in 16 states
with approximately 54,600 slot machines, video lottery terminals (“VLTs”) and e-tables, approximately 3,200 table games and approximately 47,700 hotel
rooms as of December 31, 2020. We also have international operations in five countries outside of the U.S. In addition, we have other domestic and
international properties that are authorized to use the brands and marks of Caesars Entertainment, Inc., as well as other non-gaming properties. Upon
completion of our previously announced sales, or expected sales of certain gaming properties, we expect to continue to own, lease or manage 48 properties.
See Item 2, “Properties,” for more information about our properties.
In connection with the Merger, Caesars Entertainment Corporation changed its name to “Caesars Holdings, Inc.” and Eldorado Resorts, Inc. converted into
a Delaware corporation and changed its name to “Caesars Entertainment, Inc.” In addition, effective as of July 21, 2020 our ticker symbol on the NASDAQ
Stock Market changed from “ERI” to “CZR”. In connection with the Merger, we also entered into a Master Transaction Agreement (the “MTA”) with
VICI, pursuant to which, among other things, we agreed to consummate certain sale and leaseback transactions and amend certain lease agreements with
VICI and/or its affiliates with respect to certain property described in the MTA. See Item 7 for further discussion of the Merger and Acquisitions Related
Activities.
On July 1, 2020, the Company completed the sales of Isle of Capri Casino Kansas City (“Kansas City”) and Lady Luck Casino Vicksburg (“Vicksburg”).
On September 30, 2020, the Company completed the sale of Harrah’s Reno.
On April 24, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive purchase agreement with Twin River Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (“Twin River” or subsequently,
“Bally’s Corporation”) and certain of its affiliates for the sale of the equity interests of Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport Joint Venture and Columbia
Properties Tahoe, LLC, the entities that hold Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport (“Eldorado Shreveport”) and MontBleu Casino Resort & Spa
(“MontBleu”), for aggregate consideration of $155 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The definitive agreement provides that the
consummation of the sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. The sale of Eldorado
Shreveport closed on December 23, 2020 for $140 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment, and the sale of MontBleu is expected to
close in the first half of 2021.
On September 3, 2020, the Company and VICI entered into an agreement to sell Harrah’s Louisiana Downs Casino, Racing & Entertainment (“Harrah’s
Louisiana Downs”) to Rubico Acquisition Corp. for $22 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment, which proceeds will be split between
the Company and VICI. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to
close in the first half of 2021.
In connection with its review of the Merger, the Indiana Gaming Commission determined on July 16, 2020 that, as a condition to their approval of the
Merger, the Company is required to enter into agreements to divest of three properties within the state of Indiana in order to avoid undue economic
concentration. As discussed below, the Company has entered into agreements to sell
3
Tropicana Evansville (“Evansville”) and Caesars Southern Indiana. The Company plans to enter into an agreement to divest Horseshoe Hammond prior to
December 31, 2021, as the deadline was extended by the Indiana Gaming Commission.
On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Evansville to GLPI and Twin River for $480 million in cash, subject to a customary
working capital adjustment. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to
close in mid-2021.
Also on October 27, 2020, in conjunction with the execution of the agreement to sell Evansville, the Company’s subsidiaries, Isle Casino Bettendorf and
Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo (collectively, the “Exchanging Subsidiaries”), entered into an Exchange Agreement with GLPI pursuant to which the
Exchanging Subsidiaries agreed to transfer the real estate relating to the Isle Casino Bettendorf and Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo to GLPI in exchange for the
real estate relating to Evansville. The exchange transaction closed on December 18, 2020 and as a result of the lease being classified as a finance obligation
the exchange was accounted for as a debt modification. As a result of the exchange, the real estate relating to Evansville was removed from the master lease
with GLPI that we entered into in connection with the acquisition of Tropicana (the “GLPI Master Lease”) and the real estate relating to Isle Casino
Bettendorf and Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo is now subject to the GLPI Master Lease.
On November 18, 2020, the sale of Bally's Atlantic City to Bally’s Corporation was completed for $25 million. The proceeds from the sale were split
between the Company and VICI, and the Company received $5 million of net proceeds. In addition, on October 9, 2020, we reached an agreement to sell
the Bally’s brand to Bally’s Corporation for $20 million, while retaining the right to use the brand within Bally’s Las Vegas into perpetuity. We agreed to
reimburse Bally’s Corporation $30 million for capital expenditures required at Bally’s Atlantic City and recorded a liability within Accrued other liabilities
and recorded a charge to Discontinued operations, net of income taxes. We expect that such commitment will be satisfied by adjusting obligations under
certain sportsbook operating agreements between Bally’s Corporation and the Company following our expected acquisition of William Hill.
On December 1, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Belle of Baton Rouge (“Baton Rouge”) to CQ Holding Company, Inc. Pursuant
to the terms of the GLPI Master Lease, Baton Rouge will be removed from the GLPI Master Lease, and the rent payments to GLPI will remain unchanged.
GLPI will retain ownership of the real estate of Baton Rouge. The transaction is expected to close in mid-2021 and is subject to regulatory approvals and
other customary closing conditions.
On December 24, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (“EBCI”) for
$250 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. Our annual payments to VICI under the Regional Lease (as defined below) will decline
by $33 million upon closing of the transaction. Additionally, effective as of the closing of the transaction, the Company and EBCI will enter into a long-
term agreement for the continued use of the Caesars brand and Caesars Rewards loyalty program at Caesars Southern Indiana. The sale is subject to
satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021.
Former Caesars’ properties, including Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, Caesars Southern Indiana, Horseshoe Hammond, Harrah’s Reno, Caesars UK group,
including Emerald Resort & Casino, and Bally’s Atlantic City, have met held for sale criteria as of the date of the closing of the Merger. The sales of these
properties have or are expected to close within one year from the date of the closing of the Merger and the properties are classified as discontinued
operations.
Proposed Acquisition of William Hill
Since January 29, 2019, the Company has held 13 million ordinary shares of William Hill plc and a 20% ownership interest in William Hill US Holdco,
Inc. (“William Hill US”), its United States subsidiary (together, “William Hill”). Additionally, the Company receives a profit share from the operations of
sports betting and other gaming activities associated with the Company’s properties. See below for further detail.
On September 30, 2020, we announced that we had reached an agreement with William Hill plc on the terms of a recommended cash acquisition pursuant
to which we would acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital (other than shares owned by us or held in treasury) of William Hill plc, in an all-
cash transaction of approximately £2.9 billion, or $3.7 billion. The transaction is conditioned on, among other things, the approval of William Hill plc
shareholders, which was received on November 19, 2020, and receipt of required regulatory approvals. The Company announced the early termination of
the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”) relating to the proposed combination with William Hill
plc. A final UK court hearing is scheduled for the last week of March 2021 and we expect to close the acquisition shortly thereafter. See Note 1 for further
details.
4
COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
In January 2020, an outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was identified and has since spread throughout much of the world, including
the United States. All of our casino properties were temporarily closed for the period from mid-March 2020 through mid-May 2020 due to orders issued by
various government agencies and tribal bodies as part of certain precautionary measures intended to help slow the spread of the COVID-19 public health
emergency. On May 15, 2020, we began reopening our properties and have resumed certain operations at all of our properties as of December 31, 2020,
with the exception of additional temporary closures of Caesars Windsor, Harrah’s Philadelphia, and our properties in Illinois. Subsequently, Harrah’s
Philadelphia and our properties in Illinois have reopened. The COVID-19 public health emergency has had a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. We continued to pay our full-time employees through April 10, 2020,
including tips and tokens. Effective April 11, 2020, we furloughed approximately 90% of our employees, implemented salary reductions and committed to
continue to provide benefits to our employees during the duration of their respective furlough period. A portion of our workforce has returned to service as
the properties have resumed with limited capacities and in compliance with operating restrictions imposed by governmental or tribal orders, directives, and
guidelines. Due to the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency on our results of operations, we obtained waivers on the financial
covenants in Former Caesars credit facility agreement and the GLPI Master Lease. Furthermore, we obtained waivers in relation to annual capital
expenditure requirements under the leases with VICI.
Business Operations
Our consolidated business is composed of five complementary businesses that reinforce, cross-promote, and build upon each other: casino, food and
beverage, hotel, casino management services, retail and entertainment and other business operations, including online sports betting and iGaming.
Casino Operations
Our casino operations generate revenues from approximately 54,600 slot machines and 3,200 table games, including poker, as well as other games such as
keno, and race and online sportsbooks, all of which comprised approximately 67% of our total net revenues in 2020. Slot revenues generate the majority of
our casino revenues, particularly in our properties located outside of Las Vegas and Atlantic City.
Food and Beverage Operations
Our food and beverage operations generate revenues from our dining venues, bars, nightclubs, and lounges located throughout our casinos, as well as room
service in our hotels, and represented approximately 10% of our total net revenues in 2020. Many of our properties include several dining options, ranging
from upscale dining experiences to moderately-priced restaurants.
Hotel Operations
Hotel operations generate revenues from hotel stays at our properties in our approximately 47,700 guest rooms and suites worldwide and represented
approximately 13% of our total net revenues in 2020. Our properties operate at various price and service points, allowing us to host a variety of casino
guests, who are visiting our properties for gaming and other casino entertainment options, and non-casino guests who are visiting our properties for other
purposes, such as vacation travel or conventions.
Management Services
We earn revenue from fees paid for the management of five domestic casinos. Managed properties represent Caesars-branded properties where we provide
staffing and management services under management agreements.
Entertainment and Other Non-Gaming Operations
We provide a variety of retail and entertainment offerings at our properties. We operate various entertainment venues across the United States, including the
Colosseum at Caesars Palace and Zappos Theater at Planet Hollywood. These award-winning entertainment venues are scheduled to host prominent
headliners, such as Sting, Usher, Donny Osmond, Morrissey and the Scorpions.
The LINQ Promenade is an open-air dining, entertainment, and retail development located between The LINQ Hotel & Casino and Flamingo Las Vegas,
which features The High Roller, a 550-foot observation wheel, and Fly LINQ, the first and only zipline on the Las Vegas Strip. The retail stores offer guests
a wide range of options from high-end brands and accessories to souvenirs and decorative items.
5
CAESARS FORUM is a 550,000 square-foot conference center located at the center of the Las Vegas Strip. CAESARS FORUM features 300,000 square
feet of flexible meeting space, the two largest pillarless ballrooms in the world, LEED silver-rating, and FORUM Plaza, the first 100,000 square-foot
outdoor meeting and event space in Las Vegas. Though currently available for use, COVID-19 related restrictions have limited our ability to utilize the
convention center and meeting space.
Online Sports Betting and iGaming
In September 2018, we entered into a 25-year agreement, which became effective in January 2019, with William Hill pursuant to which we (i) granted to
William Hill the right to conduct betting activities, including operating sportsbooks, in retail channels and under our first skin and third skin for online
channels with respect to our current and future properties located in the United States and the territories and possessions of the United States, including
Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and (ii) agreed that William Hill will have the right to conduct real money online gaming activities utilizing our
second skin available with respect to properties in such territories. We received a 20% ownership interest in William Hill US as well as 13 million ordinary
shares of William Hill plc in exchange for the right to the use of certain skins (described above). The fair value of the William Hill US and William Hill plc
shares received has been deferred and is recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the 25-year term of the agreement. The amortization of deferred
revenues associated with our equity interests is included in other revenue within our Corporate and Other segment. Additionally, we receive a profit share
from the operations of betting and other online gaming activities operated under our licenses. See Note 5.
As mentioned above, we have entered into an agreement with William Hill plc on the terms of a recommended cash acquisition and the consummation of
the acquisition is conditioned on receipt of required regulatory approvals. Currently William Hill operates 37 sportsbooks at our properties in eight states
and, following the acquisition, Caesars and William Hill will be live with sports wagering across 15 U.S. states plus the district of Columbia.
Additionally, the post-merger entity will operate regulated online real money gaming businesses in four states, Nevada, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and
Michigan, and continue to leverage the World Series of Poker (“WSOP”) brand, and license the WSOP trademarks for a variety of products and services.
Players in New Jersey can play over 700 casino games including slots, table games, and video poker and we expect to similarly ramp the product offering
in Pennsylvania and Michigan.
Extensive usage of digital platforms and growing bettor demand are driving the market for online sports betting platforms in the United States. We believe
that the proposed acquisition of William Hill positions us to address this growing market.
In January 2021, we also made a strategic investment into a daily fantasy sports platform, as discussed below, which complements our strong mobile sports
and gaming network.
Sports Brand Partnerships — We continue to solidify local and national partnerships that align our casinos, resorts and brands with sports fans. In 2019, we
announced high-profile exclusive sports entertainment partnerships with the NFL, making Caesars the first-ever “Official Casino Sponsor” in the history of
the league. This historic partnership combines the NFL’s legendary events with our properties to bring unique experiences to Caesars patrons. This includes
exclusive rights to use NFL trademarks in the U.S. and U.K. to promote our properties, also enabling Caesars to host exclusive special events and
experiences. For example, in April 2019, Caesars and the NFL hosted the NFL Alumni Las Vegas Draft Party with exclusive fan access to an autograph
session with legendary NFL players, giveaways and an open bar at the LINQ Hotel & Casino. Caesars will continue to host brand activations at prominent,
high-profile NFL events, including the NFL Draft, NFL playoffs, and the Super Bowl during this multi-year partnership.
Additionally, on August 24, 2020, the Company and ESPN opened a new ESPN-branded studio at the LINQ Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas where ESPN
broadcasts sports betting-themed content and other programming. Under the agreement, Caesars has been designated as ESPN’s “Official Odds Provider,”
ESPN produces and distributes certain content across ESPN’s media platforms that features Caesars branding, and Caesars purchases advertising across
ESPN and its affiliated advertising platforms, among other terms. On September 10, 2020, the Company entered into a multi-year agreement with ESPN
including link integrations from ESPN’s website and app to sportsbooks with our sports betting partner, William Hill.
Market Activities
Other Developments
Our proposed acquisition of William Hill represents a compelling opportunity to improve the offering and experience for the customer by providing access
to Caesars’ brand and highly regarded loyalty program (which had approximately 60 million members at the end of 2020). The combined company will
also be afforded the ability to access our extensive and pre-existing relationships with various sports teams and events including being the Official Casino
Sponsor of the NFL. Further, the combined company’s market access across the U.S. would be increased and would benefit from a broad network of
sportsbook
6
locations.
In addition to the proposed acquisition, in January 2021, we made a strategic investment in the daily fantasy sports platform with operations across seven
professional sports in more than 35 states. The investment complements our strong mobile sports and gaming network by adding an innovative fantasy
sports platform, allowing more options to play both online and in-person, and is expected to be tied to Caesars Rewards to permit players to earn credits
redeemable for rewards and experiences, either online or at one of our casino resorts nationwide.
Trends
COVID-19 — The extent of the ongoing and future effects of the COVID-19 public health emergency on our business and the casino resort industry
generally is uncertain, but we expect that it will continue to have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The
extent and duration of the impact of COVID-19 will ultimately depend on future developments, including but not limited to, the duration and severity of
the outbreak, business recovery trends, restrictions on operations imposed by governmental authorities, the potential for authorities reimposing stay at
home orders or additional restrictions in response to continued developments with the COVID-19 public health emergency, the efficacy and availability of
vaccines, our ability to adapt to evolving operating procedures, the impact on consumer demand and discretionary spending, the length of time it takes for
demand to return and our ability to adjust our cost structures for the duration of the outbreak’s effect on our operations.
Online Betting and Gaming — Online betting and gaming is a rapidly developing sector of the e-commerce industry and we believe the digital segment of
the global betting and gaming industry will continue to grow in popularity and consumer confidence. The market for online betting platforms is being
driven by increased use of digital processes and global, growing bettor demand. We anticipate that the United States market will begin to have a strong and
steady uptake in active wagers as state-by-state legislation in the United States continues to evolve in response to recent legislation resulting in new
opportunities in the United States sports betting market. The extent and future effects of online betting and gaming on our casino properties is uncertain but
we expect that our online betting and gaming offering will be complementary to our brick-and-mortar casino business.
Competition
The casino entertainment business is highly competitive. The industry is comprised of a diverse group of competitors that vary considerably in size and
geographic diversity, quality of facilities and amenities available, marketing and growth strategies, and financial condition. In most regions, we compete
directly with other casino facilities operating in the immediate and surrounding areas. In Las Vegas, our largest jurisdiction, competition is expected to
increase in the coming years. For example, the Genting Group is developing a casino and hotel called Resorts World Las Vegas, which is expected to open
in summer 2021. It is located on the northern end of the Las Vegas Strip. In response to changing trends, Las Vegas operators have been focused on
expanding their non-gaming offerings, including upgrades to hotel rooms, new food and beverage offerings, and new entertainment offerings. There have
also been proposals for other large scale non-gaming development projects in Las Vegas by various other developers. Our Las Vegas Strip hotels and
casinos also compete, in part, with each other.
In recent years, many casino operators, including us, have been reinvesting in existing facilities, developing or rebranding new casinos or complementary
facilities, and acquiring established facilities. These reinvestment and expansion efforts combined with aggressive marketing strategies by us and many of
our competitors have resulted in increased competition in many regions. As companies have completed new expansion projects, supply has grown at a
faster pace than demand in some areas. The expansion of properties and entertainment venues into new jurisdictions also presents competitive issues.
Atlantic City, in particular, has experienced significant competitive pressure primarily due to the addition of gaming and room capacity associated with the
expansion of gaming in Maryland, New York, and Pennsylvania, as well as the opening of new properties. This has resulted in several casino closings in
recent years. Other examples of expected increases in competition in the markets include the recent legalization of casinos at licensed horse race tracks in
Nebraska in November 2020 and the opening of Live! Casino and Hotel Philadelphia in February 2021.
Our properties also compete with legalized gaming from casinos located on Native American tribal lands. While the competitive impact on operations in
Las Vegas from the continued growth of Native American gaming establishments in California remains uncertain, the proliferation of gaming in California
and other areas located in the same regions as our properties could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In some instances, particularly in the
case of Native American casinos, our competitors pay lower taxes or no taxes. In addition, certain states have legalized, and others may legalize, casino
gaming in specific areas, including metropolitan areas from which we traditionally attract customers. These factors create additional challenges for us in
competing for customers and accessing cash flow or financing to fund improvements for our casino and entertainment products that enable us to remain
competitive.
7
We also compete with other non-gaming resorts and vacation areas, various other entertainment businesses, and other forms of gaming, such as state
lotteries, on-track and off-track wagering, video lottery terminals, and card parlors. Our non-gaming offerings also compete with other retail facilities,
amusement attractions, food and beverage offerings, and entertainment venues. Internet gaming and sports betting also create additional competition for our
brick-and-mortar operations.
Resources Material to Business
Rewards Programs
We believe Caesars Rewards, which we acquired in 2020 as a result of the Merger, enables us to compete more effectively and capture a larger share of our
customers’ entertainment spending when they travel among regions versus that of a standalone property, which is core to our cross-market strategy. Legacy
ERI loyalty club members are able to link their account to Caesars Rewards.
Members who have joined Caesars Rewards can earn Reward Credits for qualifying gaming activity and qualifying hotel, dining and retail spending at all
Caesars-affiliated properties in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Dubai. Members can also earn additional Reward Credits when they
use their Caesars Rewards VISA credit card or make a purchase through a Caesars Rewards partner. Members can redeem their earned Reward Credits with
Caesars for hotel amenities, casino free play and other items such as merchandise, gift cards, and travel.
Caesars Rewards is structured in tiers (designated as Gold, Platinum, Diamond or Seven Stars), each with increasing member benefits and privileges.
Members are provided promotional offers based on their Tier Level, their engagement with Caesars-affiliated properties, aspects of their casino gaming
play, and their preferred spending choices outside of gaming. Member information is also used in connection with various marketing promotions, including
campaigns involving direct mail, email, our websites, mobile devices, social media, and interactive slot machines.
Intellectual Property and Resources
We use a variety of trade names, service marks, trademarks, patents and copyrights in our operations and believe that we have all the licenses necessary to
conduct our continuing operations. The development of intellectual property is part of our overall business strategy. We regard our intellectual property to
be an important element of our success. We have registered several service marks, trademarks, patents and copyrights with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office or otherwise acquired the licenses to use those which are material to conduct our business. We also own patents relating to unique casino
games. While our business as a whole is not substantially dependent on any one patent, trademark, copyright, we seek to establish and maintain our
proprietary rights in our business operations and technology through the use of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secret laws. We file applications
for and obtain patents, trademarks, and copyrights in the United States and foreign countries where we believe filing for such protection is appropriate,
including United States and foreign patent applications covering certain proprietary technology of Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC (“CES”). We also seek
to maintain our trade secrets and confidential information by nondisclosure policies and through the use of appropriate confidentiality agreements. CES’
United States patents have varying expiration dates.
We have not applied for the registration of all of our trademarks, copyrights, proprietary technology, or other intellectual property rights, as the case may
be, and may not be successful in obtaining all intellectual property rights for which we have applied. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights,
parties may infringe upon our intellectual property and use information that we regard as proprietary, and our rights may be invalidated or unenforceable.
The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights or intellectual property to as great of an extent as do the laws of the United States. In
addition, others may independently develop substantially equivalent intellectual property.
We own or have the right to use proprietary rights to a number of trademarks that we consider, along with the associated name recognition, to be valuable
to our business, including Eldorado, Silver Legacy, Isle, Lady Luck, Tropicana, Circus Circus, Caesars, Flamingo, Harrah’s, Horseshoe, Paris, Caesars
Rewards, WSOP, and licenses for the Planet Hollywood trademark used in connection with the Planet Hollywood in Las Vegas and for the Bally’s
trademark used in connection with Bally’s Las Vegas in Las Vegas.
8
Industry Overview
See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” See also Exhibit 99.1, “Gaming Overview,” to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Seasonality
We believe that business at our regional properties outside of Las Vegas is subject to seasonality, including seasonality based on the weather in the markets
in which they operate and the travel habits of visitors. Business in our properties can also fluctuate due to specific holidays or other significant events, such
as Easter (particularly when the holiday falls in a different quarter than the prior year), the WSOP tournament (with respect to our Las Vegas properties),
city-wide conventions, a large sporting event or a concert, or visits by our premium players. We also believe that any seasonality, holiday, or other
significant event may affect our various properties or regions differently.
Gaming Licenses and Governmental Regulations
The gaming and racing industries are highly regulated, and we must maintain our licenses and pay gaming taxes to continue our operations. We are subject
to extensive regulation under laws, rules and supervisory procedures primarily in the jurisdictions where our facilities are located or docked. These laws,
rules and regulations generally concern the responsibility, financial stability and characters of the owners, managers, and persons with financial interests in
the gaming operations. If additional gaming regulations are adopted in a jurisdiction in which we operate, such regulations could impose restrictions or
costs that could have a significant adverse effect on us. From time to time, various proposals have been introduced in legislatures of jurisdictions in which
we have operations that, if enacted, could adversely affect the tax, regulatory, operational or other aspects of the gaming industry and us. We do not know
whether or when such legislation will be enacted. Gaming companies are currently subject to significant state and local taxes and fees in addition to normal
federal and state corporate income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. Any material increase in these taxes or fees could
adversely affect us.
Some jurisdictions, including those in which we are licensed, empower their regulators to investigate participation by licensees in gaming outside their
jurisdiction and require access to periodic reports respecting those gaming activities. Violations of laws in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary
action in other jurisdictions.
Under provisions of gaming laws in jurisdictions in which we have operations, and under our organizational documents, certain of our securities are subject
to restriction on ownership which may be imposed by specified governmental authorities. The restrictions may require a holder of our securities to dispose
of the securities or, if the holder refuses, or is unable to dispose of the securities, we may be required to repurchase the securities.
A more detailed description of the regulations to which we are subject is contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
Internal Revenue Service Regulations
The Internal Revenue Service requires operators of casinos located in the United States to file information returns for U.S. citizens, including names and
addresses of winners, for keno, bingo and slot machine winnings in excess of stipulated amounts. The Internal Revenue Service also requires operators to
withhold taxes on some keno, bingo and slot machine winnings of nonresident aliens. We are unable to predict the extent to which these requirements, if
extended, might impede or otherwise adversely affect operations of, and/or income from, other games.
Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department (“FINCEN”) and the Nevada Gaming Authorities require
the reporting of currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social
security number. This reporting obligation began in May 1985 and may have resulted in the loss of gaming revenues to jurisdictions outside the United
States which are exempt from the ambit of these regulations. In addition to currency transaction reporting requirements, suspicious financial activity is also
required to be reported to FINCEN.
Other Laws and Regulations
Our businesses are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but
are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, food service, smoking, environmental matters, employees and employment
practices, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations could change or could be
interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted. Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in
interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results.
9
The sale of alcoholic beverages is subject to licensing, control and regulation by applicable local regulatory agencies. All licenses are revocable and are not
transferable. The agencies involved have full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any license, and any disciplinary action could, and revocation
would, have a material adverse effect upon our operations.
We also deal with significant amounts of cash in our operations and are subject to various reporting and anti-money laundering regulations. Such laws and
regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted. Material changes, new laws or
regulations, or material differences in interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results. See Item 1A, “Risk
Factors,” for additional discussion.
Taxation
Gaming companies are typically subject to significant taxes and fees in addition to normal federal, state and local income taxes, and such taxes and fees are
subject to increase at any time. We pay substantial taxes and fees with respect to our operations. From time to time, federal, state, local and provincial
legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax laws, or in the administration of such laws, affecting the gaming industry. It is not possible to
determine with certainty the likelihood of changes in tax laws or in the administration of such laws.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those relating to the use, storage,
discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous materials and solid, animal and hazardous wastes and exposure to hazardous materials. Such laws and
regulations can impose liability on potentially responsible parties, including the owners or operators of real property, to clean up, or contribute to the cost of
cleaning up, sites at which hazardous wastes or materials were disposed of or released. In addition to investigation and remediation liabilities that could
arise under such laws and regulations, we could also face personal injury, property damage, fines or other claims by third parties concerning environmental
compliance or contamination or exposure to hazardous materials and could be subject to significant fines or penalties for any violations. We have from time
to time been responsible for investigating and remediating, or contributing to remediation costs related to, contamination located at or near certain of our
facilities, including contamination related to underground storage tanks and groundwater contamination arising from prior uses of land on which certain of
our facilities are located. In addition, we have been, and may in the future be, required to manage, abate, remove or contain manure and wastewater
generated by concentrated animal feeding operations due to our racetrack operations, mold, lead, asbestos-containing materials or other hazardous
conditions found in or on our properties. Although we have incurred, and expect that we will continue to incur, costs related to the investigation,
identification and remediation of hazardous materials or conditions known or discovered to exist at our properties, those costs have not had, and are not
expected to have, a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
Reporting and Record-Keeping Requirements
We are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports and furnish any other information about us and our subsidiaries that gaming
authorities may require. We are required to maintain a current stock ledger that may be examined by gaming authorities at any time. If any securities are
held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to gaming authorities. A failure
to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. Gaming authorities may, and in certain jurisdictions do, require
certificates for our securities to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to specified gaming laws.
Human Capital Management
We aim to provide a workplace that is engaging, empowering, inclusive and respectful for all employees (our “Team Members”), embracing a culture of
openness, passion for service and recognition. Our ongoing investment in professional training and development, safety, health and wellbeing and Team
Member recognition linked to guest satisfaction are all important drivers of our success in delivering outstanding financial results and creating value for our
communities. We have approximately 54,000 employees at our domestic properties throughout our organization.
10
Labor Relations
Approximately 21,000 of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with certain of our subsidiaries. The majority of these employees
in various job positions are covered by the following agreements:
Employee Group
Las Vegas Culinary Employees
Atlantic City Food & Beverage and Hotel
Employees
Las Vegas Bartenders
Las Vegas Dealers
Approximate Number of Active
Employees Represented
12,500
Union
Culinary Workers Union, Local 226
Date on which Collective Bargaining
Agreement Becomes Amendable
May 31, 2023
3,000
1,200
2,100
UNITE HERE, Local 54
Bartenders Union, Local 165
United Auto Workers
May 31, 2022
May 31, 2023
September 30, 2023
Team Member Engagement, Compensation, Benefits, Development, Safety and Wellbeing
We strive to inspire our Team Members through our mission, vision and values, and our Code of Commitment (described below). To evaluate our Team
Member experience and our retention efforts, we monitor a number of employee measures, such as turnover rates and Team Member satisfaction. We are
revising our Team Member experience surveys to help us further understand the drivers of engagement and areas where we can improve.
Our compensation and benefits programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate our Team Members. In addition to competitive salaries and wages, we
provide a variety of short-term, long-term and incentive-based compensation programs to reward performance relative to key metrics relevant to our
business. We offer comprehensive benefit options including, but not limited to, retirement savings plans, health insurance coverage (including medical,
mental health, dental, vision and pharmacy), parental leave and company-paid life insurance.
We place utmost importance on creating a safe workplace for our Team Members, embedding procedures so that all our Team Members have the
awareness, knowledge and tools to make safe working a habit.
We also have maintained a wellness program to help our Team Members improve their health and wellbeing. This program has demonstrated improved
health metrics for participating employees and their covered family members helping reduce the cost of healthcare for Team Members and for the
Company. We are implementing enhancements and a relaunch in conjunction with the consolidation of our group health plans.
In 2020, we sponsored Caesars Cares, a 501(c)(3) charity that provides financial assistance to Team Members in need. Approximately 1,200 grants totaling
approximately $1 million were provided to Team Members in 2020, including those impacted by hurricanes in several of the communities in which we
operate and the COVID-19 public health emergency.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
We embrace diversity and aim to create an inclusive working environment that celebrates all our Team Members as individuals. Our diversity, equity and
inclusion (“DEI”) framework identifies five pillars of activity: advocacy, Team Members, suppliers, communities and guests for a holistic approach to
embedding DEI in everything we do. We publish our DEI data in our annual CSR report (described below). In 2020, 44% of leadership roles in the
Company were held by women and 40% were held by people of color. In 2021, we set our new goals around gender and racial diversity. By 2025, 50% of
leadership roles will be held by women. Furthermore, by 2025, 50% of leadership roles will be held by people of color.
COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
In 2020, the COVID-19 public health emergency brought unparalleled threats to the health and safety of our Team Members, guests, partners and
communities and created unprecedented challenges. Our foremost priority was to protect the health and safety of all those connected to our business while
operating in compliance with all applicable guidance, directives and protocols. We have made every effort to alleviate hardship by providing continued pay
for up to six weeks for furloughed Team Members, maintaining payment of health insurance premiums for furloughed Team Members, maintaining our
employee assistance programs and sponsoring Caesars Cares (see above). In our communities, we donated perishable goods amounting to thousands of
meals following the closure of dining facilities at our properties. We also donated funds, and our Team Members volunteered, to help organizations across
the United States to support community needs.
11
Corporate Social Responsibility
Caesars’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and senior executives view Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) as an integral element in the way we do
business, in the belief that being a good corporate citizen helps protect the company against risk, contributes to improved performance and helps foster
positive relationships with all those with whom we connect. The Board and our executive management are committed to being an industry leader in CSR
(which includes diversity, equity and inclusion, social impact, and environmental sustainability). In 2020, the Board and our leadership continued to engage
with our CEO-level external CSR Advisory Board comprised of experts representing DEI, business strategy, academia and investors, and used their
guidance to confirm our CSR priorities. These priorities are reflected in our eleventh annual CSR report, published in 2020 in accordance with Global
Reporting Initiative Standards.
CSR Committee of the Board
Following the Merger in July 2020, Caesars’ Board formed a CSR committee that defines the duties and responsibilities of the Board in supporting delivery
of our corporate purpose and CSR strategy as well as CSR-related aspects of corporate governance such as Board diversity.
Code of Commitment
Caesars is committed to being a responsible corporate citizen and environmental steward through our CSR strategy, PEOPLE PLANET PLAY. This is
reflected in our Code of Commitment which is our public pledge to our guests, Team Members, communities, business partners and all those we reach that
we will honor the trust they have placed in us through ethical conduct and integrity. We commit to:
•
•
•
PEOPLE: Supporting the wellbeing of our Team Members, guests and local communities.
PLANET: Taking care of the world we all call home.
PLAY: Creating memorable experiences for our guests and leading responsible gaming practices in the industry.
PEOPLE PLANET PLAY Strategy
Our PEOPLE PLANET PLAY strategy defines how we meet the obligations of our Code of Commitment and is aligned with global priorities articulated by
the United Nations as the Sustainable Development Goals. PEOPLE PLANET PLAY establishes multi-year targets in key areas of impact, including
science-based greenhouse gas emissions-reduction, formally approved by the Science Based Targets Initiative (“SBTi”), aligning with global best practices
on climate change action. We are reviewing our PEOPLE PLANET PLAY targets and expect to publish our targets after our first year as a combined entity.
Responsible Gaming
For more than thirty years, Caesars has maintained its Responsible Gaming (“RG”) program. We train tens of thousands of Team Members each year and a
cadre of RG Ambassadors throughout our properties to identify guests in need of assistance and provide support. In recent years, Caesars has contributed to
the National Center for Responsible Gaming, the National Council on Problem Gaming and other state programs to help advance responsible practices in
the gaming industry.
Environmental Stewardship
We take a proactive approach to environmental sustainability through our CodeGreen strategy established by Former Caesars in 2007, consistently
improving our performance across energy and greenhouse gas emissions efficiencies, reduction of water consumption and increasing waste diversion from
landfills. Caesars recognizes the impact climate change can play both on our business and the guests we serve. Identifying, assessing, and managing the
risks and opportunities therefore plays a vital role in our long-term strategic thinking on climate and water, and how we approach our CSR goals. Between
2011 and 2019, Former Caesars reduced its absolute Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions by 19.7%. In 2019, Former Caesars further
committed to mitigating its impact on climate change by updating our previously approved science based targets to be in line with well below 2 degrees
Celsius per SBTi: (i) reducing absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 35% by 2025, and 100% by 2050 from a 2011 base-year and (ii) having 60% of
suppliers by spend institute science-based GHG reduction targets for their operations by 2023. In 2021, we expect to establish a new baseline in order to
reaffirm our targets and goals as a combined company. Caesars is pursuing renewable energy sources and low-carbon options, including on site solar
developments. Our long-term goals include evaluating energy supply for each of our properties in pursuit of our SBTs.
We voluntarily participate in the CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project), an international nonprofit that drives sustainable economies. In 2020,
Caesars made the A List for climate and water security and earned a spot on the Supplier Engagement Leaderboard from CDP. Just 5% of companies
assessed by CDP make A List and only 7% make the Supplier Engagement Leaderboard.
12
We are committed to creating and investing in policies and procedures towards CSR efforts. In order to engage guests in our CSR efforts, we have branded
our hotel rooms with our PEOPLE PLANET PLAY messaging, inviting guests to play a role by using water, air-conditioning and towels with the
environment in mind. We promote sustainable sourcing of key food ingredients for our menus from sustainably managed farms and fisheries.
Community Investment
Caesars contributes extensively to our local communities to help them develop and prosper, through funding community projects, employee volunteering
and cash donations from the Caesars Foundation, a private foundation funded from our operating income. In 2020, the Caesars Foundation contributed $1.3
million to communities across the United States with an emphasis on COVID-19 crisis relief at the local level through food and shelter insecurity, wellness
and workforce development programs. The Foundation also continued to support significant national relationships that support diversity equity and
inclusion.
Many of our community partners are long-term collaborations. For example, our many years of partnership with Meals on Wheels America (“MOWA”) to
combat the issues of senior hunger and isolation cumulated in a national virtual summit during Seniors Appreciation Month in 2020 which addressed
exponential needs on the issues, particularly given the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency.
From 2018 through 2020, we hosted a national Economic Equity Tour through live webinars and on-line resources for thousands of women of color owned
small businesses, and diverse non-profits. Expert-led webinars provided resources in the areas of financial empowerment, nonprofit organization
development, and entrepreneurship.
Available Information
We are required to file annual, quarterly and other current reports and information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Because we
submit filings to the SEC electronically, access to this information is available at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). This site contains reports and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
We make our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports,
available free of charge on our corporate website (www.caesars.com/corporate) as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or
furnished to, the SEC. In addition, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on our website. We will provide reasonable quantities of electronic or paper copies of
filings free of charge upon request. In addition, we will provide a copy of the above referenced charters to stockholders upon request.
References in this document to our website address do not incorporate by reference the information contained on the website into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
13
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Risks Relating to Operating Our Business
The outbreak of COVID-19 has impacted our operations and caused an economic downturn, widespread unemployment and an adverse impact on
consumer sentiment, and we expect that our business and results of operations will continue to be adversely affected by the impact of COVID-19 for the
foreseeable future.
On March 13, 2020, in response to the coronavirus public health emergency the U.S. government declared a national state of emergency. In an effort to help
control the spread of COVID-19, public health officials imposed or recommended various measures. All of our casino properties were temporarily closed
for the period from mid-March 2020 due to orders issued by various government agencies and tribal bodies as part of certain precautionary measures
intended to help slow the spread of the COVID-19 public health emergency. See “Item 1 – Business - COVID-19 Public Health Emergency” for further
description of the precautionary measures imposed on us and the temporary closure of our casinos. While we began to open our properties beginning in
mid-May 2020 and almost all of our properties are currently open, our operations, financial results and cash flows have been, and we expect them to
continue to be, affected by social distancing measures, including reduced gaming operations arising from the reconfiguration of our gaming floor,
limitations on the number of customers present in our facilities, restrictions on hotel, food and beverage outlets and limits on events that would otherwise
attract customers to our properties.
COVID-19 has materially adversely affected the economy and financial markets of the United States and the world and has resulted in widespread
unemployment in the United States. Consumer demand for casino hotel and racetrack properties such as ours is particularly sensitive to downturns in the
economy, unemployment and the associated impact on discretionary spending on leisure activities which bring demand for casino hotel properties such as
ours. Reduced customer demand could result in lower occupancy rates, reduced visitation and additional disruptions in our casino business.
The impact of COVID-19 on our business remains uncertain. In particular, a delay in wide distribution of a vaccine, or a lack of public acceptance of a
vaccine, could lead people to continue to self-isolate and not participate in the economy at pre-pandemic levels for a prolonged period of time. To the
extent the U.S. economy and other major global economies experience a recession as a result of COVID-19, our business and operations could be
materially adversely affected.
The impact of changes in customer demand resulting from the economic downturn, widespread unemployment, reduced consumer confidence and
consumer fears on our properties cannot reasonably be determined, but it could be significant and protracted. As a result of the foregoing, we expect that
COVID-19 will continue to have a material impact on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations (including revenues and
profitability) for an extended period of time.
We face substantial competition in the hotel and casino industry, especially in Las Vegas, our largest jurisdiction, and expect that such competition will
continue.
The gaming industry is highly competitive and competition is intense in most of the markets in which we operate. We compete with a variety of gaming
operations, including land-based casinos, dockside casinos, riverboat casinos, casinos located on racing tracks and casinos located on Native American
reservations and other forms of legalized gaming such as video gaming terminals (VGTs) at bars, restaurants and truck stops and online gambling and
sports betting. We also compete, to a lesser extent, with other forms of legalized gaming and entertainment such as bingo, pull tab games, card parlors,
sportsbooks, fantasy sports websites, “cruise-to-nowhere” operations, pari-mutuel or telephonic betting on horse racing and dog racing, state-sponsored
lotteries, jai-alai and, in the future, may compete with gaming at other venues. In addition, we compete more generally with other forms of entertainment
for the discretionary spending of our customers. In some instances, particularly in the case of Native American casinos, our competitors pay lower taxes or
no taxes.
In recent years, many casino operators, including us, have reinvested in existing jurisdictions to attract new customers or to gain market share, thereby
increasing competition in those jurisdictions. As an example, in response to changing trends, Las Vegas operators have been focused on expanding their
non-gaming offerings, including upgrades to hotel rooms, new food and beverage offerings, and new entertainment offerings. The expansion of existing
casino entertainment properties, the increase in the number of properties, and the aggressive marketing strategies of many of our competitors have
increased competition in many markets in which we operate, and this intense competition is expected to continue. While the long term impact of COVID-
19 on these market dynamics remains uncertain, these competitive pressures have and are expected to continue to adversely affect our financial
performance.
Our brick-and-mortar operations face increasing competition as a result of the expansion of legalized online gaming and betting in a number of the
jurisdictions in which we operate. While we believe that we are well positioned to compete with new entrants to the betting and gaming market through
online betting and gaming, including through our online betting and gaming
14
offerings, the competitive dynamic is evolving and we cannot assure you that our results of operations will not be adversely impacted by the expansion of
legalized online gaming and betting.
States that already have legalized casino gaming may further expand gaming, and other states that have not yet legalized gaming may do so in the future.
We also compete with Native American gaming operations in California and other jurisdictions where Native American tribes operate large-scale gaming
facilities or otherwise conduct gaming activities on Native American lands, which we expect will continue to expand. Further expansion of legalized casino
gaming in jurisdictions in or near our markets or changes to gaming laws in states in which we have operations and in states near our operations could
increase competition and could adversely affect our operations.
Increased competition may require us to make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and enhance the competitive positions of our properties to
increase the attractiveness and add to the appeal of our facilities. Because a significant portion of our cash flow is required to pay obligations under our
outstanding indebtedness and our lease obligations, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient funds to undertake, or that we will be able to
obtain sufficient financing to fund, such expenditures. If we are unable to make such expenditures, our competitive position could be negatively affected.
Our business is sensitive to reductions in discretionary consumer spending as a result of downturns in the economy and other factors outside our
control.
Consumer demand for casino hotel and racetrack properties such as ours is particularly sensitive to downturns in the economy and the associated impact on
discretionary spending on leisure activities. Changes in discretionary consumer spending or consumer preferences brought about by factors such as
perceived or actual general economic conditions, effects of declines in consumer confidence in the economy, the impact of high energy and food costs, the
increased cost of travel, decreased disposable consumer income and wealth, fears of war and future acts of terrorism, or widespread illnesses or epidemics,
including COVID-19, can have a material adverse effect on leisure and business travel, discretionary spending and other areas of economic behavior that
directly impact the gaming and entertainment industries in general and could further reduce customer demand for the amenities that we offer. In addition,
increases in gasoline prices, including increases prompted by global political and economic instabilities, can adversely affect our operations because most
of our patrons travel to our properties by car or on airlines that may pass on increases in fuel costs to passengers in the form of higher ticket prices.
Win rates (hold rates) for our casino operations depend on a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control.
The gaming industry is characterized by an element of chance. Accordingly, we employ theoretical win rates to estimate what a certain type of game, on
average, will win or lose in the long run. In addition to the element of chance, win rates (hold percentages) are also affected by the spread of table limits
and factors that are beyond our control, such as a player’s skill, experience, and behavior, the mix of games played, the financial resources of players, the
volume of bets placed, and the amount of time players spend gambling. As a result of the variability in these factors, the actual win rates at our casinos may
differ from the theoretical win rates we have estimated and could result in the winnings of our gaming customers exceeding those anticipated. The
variability of win rates (hold rates) also have the potential to negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
We face the risk of fraud, theft, and cheating.
We face the risk that gaming customers may attempt or commit fraud or theft or cheat in order to increase winnings. Such acts of fraud, theft, or cheating
could involve the use of counterfeit chips or other tactics, possibly in collusion with our employees. Internal acts of cheating could also be conducted by
employees through collusion with dealers, surveillance staff, floor managers, or other casino or gaming area staff. Additionally, we also face the risk that
customers may attempt or commit fraud or theft with respect to our non-gaming offerings or against other customers. Such risks include stolen credit or
charge cards or cash, falsified checks, theft of retail inventory and purchased goods, and unpaid or counterfeit receipts. Failure to discover such acts or
schemes in a timely manner could result in losses in our operations. Negative publicity related to such acts or schemes could have an adverse effect on our
reputation, potentially causing a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
We extend credit to a portion of our customers, and we may not be able to collect gaming receivables from our credit customers.
We conduct our gaming activities on a credit and cash basis at many of our properties. Any such credit we extend is unsecured. Table games players
typically are extended more credit than slot players, and high-stakes players typically are extended more credit than customers who tend to wager lower
amounts. High-end gaming is more volatile than other forms of gaming, and variances in win-loss results attributable to high-end gaming may have a
significant positive or negative impact on cash flow and earnings in a particular period. We extend credit to those customers whose level of play and
financial resources warrant, in
15
the opinion of management, an extension of credit. These large receivables could have a significant impact on our results of operations if deemed
uncollectible. Gaming debts evidenced by a credit instrument, including what is commonly referred to as a “marker,” and judgments on gaming debts are
enforceable under the current laws of the jurisdictions in which we allow play on a credit basis, and judgments on gaming debts in such jurisdictions are
enforceable in all U.S. states under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution; however, other jurisdictions may determine that enforcement
of gaming debts is against public policy. Although courts of some foreign nations will enforce gaming debts directly and the assets in the U.S. of foreign
debtors may be reached to satisfy a judgment, judgments on gaming debts from U.S. courts are not binding on the courts of many foreign nations.
In addition, in November 2017, the Chinese government adopted new rules to control the cross-border transportation of cash and bearer negotiable
instruments, specifically to reduce the international transfer of cash in connection with activities that are illegal in China, including gambling. The Chinese
government has recently taken steps to prohibit the transfer of cash for the payment of gaming debts. These developments may have the effect of reducing
the collectability of gaming debts of players from China. It is unclear whether these and other measures will continue to be in effect or become more
restrictive in the future. These and any future foreign currency control policy developments that may be implemented by foreign jurisdictions could
significantly impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Compromises of our information systems or unauthorized access to confidential information or our customers’ personal information could materially
harm our reputation and business.
We collect and store confidential, personal information relating to our customers for various business purposes, including marketing and financial purposes,
and credit card information for processing payments. For example, we handle, collect and store personal information in connection with our customers
staying at our hotels and enrolling in Caesars Rewards. We may share this personal and confidential information with vendors or other third parties in
connection with processing of transactions, operating certain aspects of our business, or for marketing purposes. Our collection and use of personal data are
governed by state and federal privacy laws and regulations as well as the applicable laws and regulations in other countries in which we operate. Privacy
law is subject to frequent changes and varies significantly by jurisdiction. We may incur significant costs in order to ensure compliance with the various
applicable privacy requirements. In addition, privacy laws and regulations may limit our ability to market to our customers.
We assess and monitor the security of collection, storage, and transmission of customer information on an ongoing basis. We utilize commercially available
software and technologies to monitor, assess and secure our network. Further, some of the systems currently used for transmission and approval of payment
card transactions and the technology utilized in payment cards themselves, all of which can put payment card data at risk, are determined and controlled by
the payment card industry, and other such systems are determined and controlled by us. Although we have taken steps designed to safeguard our customers’
confidential personal information and important internal company data, our network and other systems and those of third parties, such as service providers,
could be compromised, damaged, or disrupted by a third-party breach of our system security or that of a third-party provider or as a result of purposeful or
accidental actions of third parties, our employees, or those employees of a third party, power outages, computer viruses, system failures, natural disasters,
or other catastrophic events. Our third-party information system service providers face risks relating to cybersecurity similar to ours, and we do not directly
control any of such parties’ information security operations. Advances in computer and software capabilities, encryption technology, new tools, and other
developments may increase the risk of a security breach. As a result of any security breach, customer information or other proprietary data may be accessed
or transmitted by or to a third party. Despite the measures we have implemented to safeguard our information, there can be no assurance that we are
adequately protecting our information.
Any loss, disclosure of, misappropriation of, or access to customers’ or other proprietary information or other breach of our information security could
result in legal claims or legal proceedings, including regulatory investigations and actions, or liability for failure to comply with privacy and information
security laws, including for failure to protect personal information or for misusing personal information, which could disrupt our operations, damage our
reputation, and expose us to claims from customers, financial institutions, regulators, payment card associations, employees, and other persons, any of
which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
We have cybersecurity insurance to respond to a breach which is designed to cover expenses around notification, credit monitoring, investigation, crisis
management, public relations and legal advice. We also carry other insurance which may cover ancillary aspects of the event; however, damage and claims
arising from a breach may not be completely covered or may exceed the amount of any insurance available.
16
Our reliance on our computer systems and software could expose us to great financial harm if any of our computer systems or software were subject to
any material disruption or corruption.
We rely significantly on our computer systems and software to receive and properly process internal and external data, including data related to Caesars
Rewards. A disruption or corruption of the proper functioning of our computer systems or software could cause us to lose data or record erroneous data,
which could result in material losses. We cannot guarantee that our efforts to maintain competitive computer systems and software will be successful. Our
computer systems and software may fail or be subject to bugs or other errors, resulting in service interruptions or other unintended consequences. If any of
these risks materialize, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations
Acts of terrorism, war, natural disasters, severe weather, and political, economic and military conditions may impede our ability to operate or may
negatively impact our financial results.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of war or hostility have created many economic and political uncertainties. For example, a substantial number of the
customers of our properties in Las Vegas use air travel. As a result of terrorist acts that occurred on September 11, 2001, domestic and international travel
was severely disrupted, which resulted in a decrease in customer visits to our properties in Las Vegas. Visitation to Las Vegas also declined for a period of
time following the mass shooting tragedy on October 1, 2017. We cannot predict the extent to which disruptions in air or other forms of travel as a result of
any further terrorist act, security alerts or war, uprisings, or hostilities in places such as Iraq, Afghanistan, and/or Syria or other countries throughout the
world, and governmental responses to those acts or hostilities, will directly or indirectly impact our business and operating results. For example, our
operations in Cairo, Egypt, were negatively affected from the uprising there in January 2011. As a consequence of the threat of terrorist attacks and other
acts of war or hostility in the future, premiums for a variety of insurance products have increased, and some types of insurance are no longer available. If
any such event were to affect our properties, we would likely be adversely affected.
In addition, natural and man-made disasters such as major fires, floods, severe snowstorms, hurricanes, earthquakes, and oil spills could also adversely
impact our business and operating results. Such events could lead to the loss of use of one or more of our properties for an extended period of time and
disrupt our ability to attract customers to certain of our gaming facilities. For example, our property in Lake Charles, Louisiana has been closed since
August 27, 2020 due to damage resulting from Hurricane Laura. Inadequate insurance or lack of available insurance for these and other certain types or
levels of risk could expose us to significant losses in the event that a catastrophe occurred for which we are underinsured. In most cases, we have insurance
that covers portions of any losses from a natural disaster, but it is subject to deductibles and maximum payouts in many cases. Although we may be covered
by insurance from a natural disaster, the timing of our receipt of insurance proceeds, if any, may be out of our control. In some cases, however, we may
receive no proceeds from insurance. Further, if properties subject to our leases with VICI and GLPI are impacted by a casualty event, such leases require us
to repair or restore the affected properties even if the cost of such repair or restoration exceeds the insurance proceeds that we receive. Under such
circumstances, the rent under such leases is required to be paid during the period of repair or restoration even if all or a portion of the affected property is
not operating. In addition to the damage caused to our properties by a casualty loss, we may suffer business disruption as a result of the casualty event or be
subject to claims by third parties that may be injured or harmed. While we carry general liability insurance and business interruption insurance, there can be
no assurance that insurance will be available or adequate to cover all loss and damage to which our business or our assets might be subjected and the timing
and receipt of insurance proceeds, if any, may be out of our control.
Our business may be subject to seasonal fluctuations that could result in volatility and have an adverse effect on our operating results.
Our business may be subject to some degree of seasonality. Weather conditions may deter or prevent customers from reaching the facilities or undertaking
trips. Such conditions would particularly affect customers who are traveling longer distances to visit our properties. Seasonality may cause our properties
working capital cash flow requirements to vary from quarter to quarter depending on the variability in the volume and timing of sales. Business in our
properties can also fluctuate due to specific holidays or other significant events, such as Easter (particularly when the holiday falls in a different quarter
than the prior year), the World Series of Poker tournament (with respect to our Las Vegas properties), city-wide conventions, a large sporting event or a
concert, or visits by our premium players. We also believe that any seasonality, holiday, or other significant event may affect our various properties or
regions differently. These factors, among other things, make forecasting more difficult and may adversely affect our properties’ ability to manage working
capital and to predict financial results accurately, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Our business is particularly sensitive to energy prices and a rise in energy prices could harm our operating results.
We are a large consumer of electricity and other energy and, therefore, higher energy prices may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Accordingly, increases in energy costs may have a negative impact on our operating results. Additionally,
17
higher electricity and gasoline prices that affect our customers may result in reduced visitation to our resorts and a reduction in our revenues. We may be
indirectly impacted by regulatory requirements aimed at reducing the impacts of climate change directed at up-stream utility providers, as we could
experience potentially higher utility, fuel, and transportation costs.
Any deterioration in our reputation or the reputation of our brands could adversely impact our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our business is dependent on the quality and reputation of our Company and brands. Events beyond our control could affect the reputation of one or more
of our properties or more generally impact our corporate or brand image. Other factors that could influence our reputation include the quality of the
services we offer and our actions with regard to social issues such as diversity, human rights and support for local communities. Broad access to social
media makes it easy for anyone to provide public feedback that can influence perceptions of us, our brands or our properties. It may be difficult to control
or effectively manage negative publicity, regardless of whether it is accurate. Negative events and publicity could quickly and materially damage
perceptions of us, our brands or our properties, which, in turn, could adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations through loss
of customers, loss of business opportunities, lack of acceptance of our company to operate in host communities, employee retention or recruiting
difficulties or other difficulties.
Risks related to Human Capital
We rely on our key personnel and we may face difficulties in attracting and retaining qualified employees for our casinos and race tracks.
Our future success will depend upon, among other things, our ability to keep our senior executives and highly qualified employees. The operation of our
business requires, qualified executives, managers and skilled employees with gaming and horse racing industry experience and qualifications who are able
to obtain the requisite licenses and approval from the applicable gaming authorities. We compete with other potential employers for employees, and we
may not succeed in hiring or retaining the executives and other employees that we need. A sudden loss of or inability to replace key employees could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, there has from time to time been a shortage of skilled
labor in our markets and the continued expansion of gaming near our facilities, including the expansion of Native American gaming and internet betting
and gaming, may make it more difficult for us to attract qualified candidates. While we believe that we will continue to be able to attract and retain
qualified employees, shortages of skilled labor will make it increasingly difficult and expensive to attract and retain the services of a satisfactory number of
qualified employees, and we may incur higher costs than expected as a result.
Work stoppages and other labor problems could negatively impact our future profits.
As of December 31, 2020, we had collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 21,000 employees. A lengthy strike or other work stoppages at
any of our casino properties could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
From time to time, we have also experienced attempts by labor organizations to organize certain of our non-union employees. These efforts have achieved
some success to date. We cannot provide any assurance that we will not experience additional and successful union activity in the future. The impact of this
union activity is undetermined and could negatively impact our results of operations.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our performers and other entertainment offerings on acceptable terms or at all.
While our ability to offer live performances has been limited due to COVID-19, historically our performers have drawn customers to our properties and
have been a significant source of our revenue. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our performers or other shows on acceptable terms or at
all. In addition, the third parties that we depend on for our properties’ entertainment offerings may become incapable or unwilling to provide their services
at the level agreed upon or at all.
Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure
Our substantial indebtedness and the fact that a significant portion of our cash flow is used to make interest payments and rent payments under our
lease agreements could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy
or our industry and prevent us from making debt service payments and rent payments.
18
As of December 31, 2020 we had $15.0 billion of outstanding face value indebtedness, in addition to leases with VICI and GLPI that require an annual rent
payment of $1.1 billion in 2021 and that are subject to annual escalation. See Note 10 for a description of our obligations under our leases with VICI and
GLPI and Note 12 for details regarding our debt outstanding and related restrictive covenants. As a result, a significant portion of our cash flow is applied
to make interest payments with respect to our outstanding debt and payments under our leases. These financial obligations may have important negative
consequences for us, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a significant portion of these funds to make
payments on our debt and lease obligations;
increasing our vulnerability to the COVID-19 pandemic and general adverse economic and industry conditions;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our businesses and the markets in which we operate;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors with debt and rent obligations that are less than ours;
increasing our vulnerability to, and limiting our ability to react to, changing market conditions, changes in our industry and economic downturns;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures, debt service, acquisitions, general
corporate or other obligations;
subjecting us to a number of restrictive covenants that, among other things, require us to make capital expenditures and limit our ability to pay
dividends and distributions, make acquisitions and dispositions, borrow additional funds and make other investments;
exposing us to interest rate risk due to the variable interest rate on borrowings under our credit facilities; and
affecting our ability to renew gaming and other licenses necessary to conduct our business.
Despite our current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still incur significant additional indebtedness. Incurring more indebtedness could
increase the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness, including additional secured indebtedness, and may enter into financing
obligations similar to our leases with VICI and GLPI in the future. As of December 31, 2020, we had $2.2 billion of borrowing capacity under our
revolving credit facilities, before consideration of $19 million in outstanding letters of credit under CEI Revolving Credit Facility and $65 million in
outstanding letters of credit under CRC Revolving Credit Facility. Further, our existing debt agreements currently permit, and we expect that agreements
governing debt that we incur in the future will permit, us to incur certain other additional secured and unsecured debt. Further, we may incur other
liabilities that do not constitute indebtedness. The risks that we face based on our outstanding indebtedness may intensify if we incur additional
indebtedness or financing obligations in the future.
The LIBOR calculation method may change and LIBOR is expected to be phased out after 2021.
Our credit facilities calculate interest on the outstanding principal balance using LIBOR. On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct
Authority (the “FCA”) announced it would phase out LIBOR as a benchmark by the end of 2021. In the meantime, actions by the FCA, other regulators or
law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the method by which LIBOR is calculated. At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect on our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of any such changes or any other reforms to LIBOR that may be enacted in the United Kingdom or
elsewhere.
A significant portion of our casinos are located on leased property. If we default on one or more leases, the applicable lessors could terminate the
affected leases and we could lose possession of the affected casino.
We currently lease certain parcels of land on which a significant portion of our properties are located. As a ground lessee, we have the right to use the
leased land; however, we do not hold fee ownership of the underlying land. Accordingly, we have no interest in the leased land or improvements thereon at
the expiration of the ground leases. If our use of the land underlying our casino properties is disrupted permanently or for a significant period of time, then
the value of our assets could be impaired and our business and operations could be adversely affected. Our leases provide that they may be terminated for a
number of reasons, including failure to pay rent, taxes or other payment obligations or the breach of other covenants contained in the leases. In particular,
our leases with GLPI and VICI require annual rent payments of at least $1.1 billion in 2021, which is subject to escalation annually, and obligate us to
make specified minimum capital expenditures with respect to the leased properties. If our business and properties fail to generate sufficient earnings, the
payments required to service the rent obligations under our leases with GLPI and VICI could materially and adversely limit our ability to react to changes
in our business and make acquisitions and investments in our properties. If we were to default on any one or more of these leases, the applicable lessors
could terminate the affected leases and we could lose possession of the affected land and any improvements on the land, including the hotels and casinos. A
termination of our ground leases or our leases with GLPI or VICI could result in a default under our debt agreements and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results
19
of operations. Further, in the event that any lessor of our leased properties, including GLPI or VICI, encounters financial, operational, regulatory or other
challenges, there can be no assurance that such lessor will be able to comply with its obligations under the applicable lease.
Certain of our leases, including our leases with GLPI and VICI, are “triple-net” leases. Accordingly, in addition to rent, we are required to pay, among other
things, the following: (1) lease payments to the underlying ground lessor for properties that are subject to ground leases; (2) facility maintenance costs; (3)
all insurance premiums for insurance with respect to the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties; (4) taxes levied on or with
respect to the leased properties (other than taxes on the income of the lessor); and (5) all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased
properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. We are responsible for incurring the costs described in the preceding sentence
notwithstanding the fact that many of the benefits received in exchange for such costs shall in part accrue to the lessor as the owner of the associated
facilities. In addition, we remain obligated for lease payments and other obligations under our leases with GLPI and VICI and other ground leases even if
one or more of such leased facilities is unprofitable or if we decide to withdraw from those locations. We could incur special charges relating to the closing
of such facilities including lease termination costs, impairment charges and other special charges that would reduce our net income and could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
We are subject to extensive governmental regulation, taxation policies and licensing, and gaming authorities have significant control over our
operations, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Licensing Requirements. The ownership and operation of casino gaming, online betting and gaming, riverboat and horse racing facilities are subject to
extensive federal, state and local regulation, and regulatory authorities at local, state and national levels have broad powers with respect to the licensing of
gaming businesses. We currently hold all state and local licenses and related approvals necessary to conduct our present gaming operations, but we must
periodically apply to renew many of our licenses and registrations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such renewals. Any failure to
maintain or renew our existing licenses, registrations, permits or approvals would have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, if additional laws or
regulations are adopted or existing laws or regulations are amended or interpreted differently, these regulations could impose additional restrictions or costs
that could have a significant adverse effect on us.
Gaming authorities with jurisdiction over our operations may, in their discretion, require the holder of any securities issued by us to file applications, be
investigated, and be found suitable to own our securities, and, if a holder is found unsuitable, we can be sanctioned, including the loss of approvals that are
required for us to continue our gaming operations in the relevant jurisdictions, if such unsuitable person does not timely sell our securities. Our officers,
directors and key employees are also subject to similar findings of unsuitability and the gaming authorities may require us to terminate the employment of
any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. See “Item 1 - Gaming Licenses and Governmental Regulations” and Exhibit 99.1 for further
description of the regulations to which we are subject. The results of findings of unsuitability could materially adversely affect our gaming operations.
Applicable gaming laws and regulations restrict our ability to issue securities, incur debt and undertake other financing activities. Such transactions would
generally require approval of applicable gaming authorities, and our financing counterparties, including lenders, might be subject to various licensing and
related approval procedures in the various jurisdictions in which we operate gaming facilities.
Compliance with Other Laws. We are also subject to a variety of other federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances that apply to non-
gaming businesses, including restrictions enacted in response to COVD-19, zoning, environmental, construction and land-use laws and regulations
governing smoking and the serving of alcoholic beverages. Our operations have been adversely impacted by regulations enacted to limit the spread of
COVID-19. In addition, legislation in various forms to ban indoor tobacco smoking has been enacted or introduced in many states and local jurisdictions,
including several of the jurisdictions in which we operate. If additional restrictions are enacted in our jurisdictions, we could experience a significant
decrease in gaming revenue and operating results at our properties and, particularly if such restrictions are not applicable to all competitive facilities in that
gaming market, our business could be materially adversely affected. The likelihood or outcome of similar legislation in other jurisdictions and referendums
in the future cannot be predicted, though any additional limitations on our operations would be expected to negatively impact our financial performance.
Regulations adopted by FINCEN require us to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day. U.S. Treasury Department
regulations also require us to report certain suspicious activity, including any transaction that exceeds $5,000, if we know, suspect or have reason to believe
that the transaction involves funds from illegal activity or is designed to evade federal regulations or reporting requirements. Substantial penalties can be
imposed if we fail to comply with these regulations. FINCEN has recently increased its focus on gaming companies.
20
We are required to report certain customer’s gambling winnings via form W-2G to comply with current Internal Revenue Service regulations. Should these
regulations change, we would expect to incur additional costs to comply with the revised reporting requirements.
Taxation and Fees. In addition, gaming companies are generally subject to significant revenue-based taxes and fees in addition to normal federal, state and
local income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. We pay substantial taxes and fees with respect to our operations. Tax laws
are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied, affecting the gaming industry. The large
number of state and local governments with significant current or projected budget deficits makes it more likely that those governments that currently
permit gaming will seek to fund such deficits with new or increased gaming taxes and/or property taxes and worsening economic conditions could intensify
those efforts. Any material increase, or the adoption of additional taxes or fees, could have a material adverse effect on our future financial results.
We expect to expand our sportsbook business and engage in online sportsbook, casino gaming and poker. There can be no assurance that regulations
authorizing such activities will be approved in the jurisdictions in which we operate or that the market for such gaming activities will develop as
expected.
During the second quarter of 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the federal ban on sports betting. As a result, several jurisdictions in which we
operate legalized sports betting and additional jurisdictions may do so in the future. We have entered into an agreement with William Hill plc on the terms
of a recommended cash acquisition pursuant to which we would acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital (other than shares owned by us or
held in treasury) of William Hill plc and we currently have relationships with (i) William Hill pursuant to which William Hill has agreed to operate as our
sports betting operator, including with respect to mobile and online sports wagering, for a period of 25 years, (ii) the Stars Group Inc. (“TSG”) pursuant to
which we agreed to provide TSG with options to obtain access to certain of our licenses for online sports wagering and real money online gaming and
poker, for a period of 20 years, (iii) various sports brands including NFL and ESPN, for limited events, and (iv) other online betting and gaming operators.
See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Partnerships and Acquisitions” for a further
description of the arrangements with William Hill, TSG, and additional sports brands. Currently William Hill operates 37 sportsbooks at our properties in
eight states and, following the acquisition, Caesars and William Hill will be live with sports wagering across 15 U.S. states plus the district of Columbia.
However, our ability to further expand our sports betting and online operations is dependent on adoption of regulations permitting sports betting in the
United. There can be no assurances when, or if, any such regulations will be adopted, or the terms of such regulations, in certain of the jurisdictions in
which we operate.
The market for sports betting and online gaming is rapidly evolving and highly competitive with an increasing number of competitors. The success of our
sportsbook and online betting and gaming partners, our interest in William Hill and TSG and the results of operations from sports betting and online
sportsbook and gaming conducted at our properties or under the authority of our licenses are dependent on a number of factors that are beyond our control,
including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the timing of adoption of regulations authorizing such betting and gaming activities and the restrictions contained in such regulations;
the tax rates and license fees applicable to such activities;
our ability to gain market share in a newly developing market;
the potential that the market does not develop at all or does not develop as we anticipate;
our ability to compete with new entrants in the market;
changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences; and
the availability and popularity of other forms of entertainment.
There can be no assurance as to the returns that we will receive from our current and anticipated sports betting and online gaming operations or our other
relationships that we have granted rights to market access or future similar arrangements with other market service providers.
We may not be able to protect the intellectual property rights we own or may be prevented from using intellectual property necessary for our business.
The development of intellectual property is part of our overall business strategy, and we regard our intellectual property to be an important element of our
success. We rely primarily on trade secret, trademark, domain name, copyright, and contract law to protect the intellectual property and proprietary
technology we own. We also actively pursue business opportunities in the United States and in international jurisdictions involving the licensing of our
trademarks to third parties. It is possible that third parties may copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property or proprietary technology without
authorization or otherwise infringe on our rights. For example, while we have a policy of entering into confidentiality, intellectual property invention
assignment, and/or non-competition and non-solicitation agreements or restrictions with our employees, independent
21
contractors, and business partners, such agreements may not provide adequate protection or may be breached, or our proprietary technology may otherwise
become available to or be independently developed by our competitors. The laws of some foreign countries may not protect proprietary rights or
intellectual property to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, the unauthorized use or
reproduction of our trademarks could diminish the value of our trademarks and our market acceptance, competitive advantages, or goodwill, which could
adversely affect our business.
Third parties have alleged and may in the future allege that we are infringing, misappropriating, or otherwise violating their intellectual property rights.
Third parties may initiate litigation against us without warning or may send us letters or other communications that make allegations without initiating
litigation. We may elect not to respond to these letters or other communications if we believe they are without merit, or we may attempt to resolve these
disputes out of court by negotiating a license, but in either case it is possible that such disputes will ultimately result in litigation. Any such claims could
interfere with our ability to use technology or intellectual property that is material to the operation of our business. Such claims may be made by
competitors seeking to obtain a competitive advantage or by other parties, such as entities that purchase intellectual property assets for the purpose of
bringing infringement claims. We also periodically employ individuals who were previously employed by our competitors or potential competitors, and we
may therefore be subject to claims that such employees have used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former
employers.
At any time, we may have to rely on litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, determine the validity and scope of the
proprietary rights of others, or defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Any such litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in
substantial costs and the diversion of resources and the attention of management. If unsuccessful, such litigation could result in the loss of important
intellectual property rights, require us to pay substantial damages, subject us to injunctions that prevent us from using certain intellectual property, require
us to make admissions that affect our reputation in the marketplace, and require us to enter into license agreements that may not be available on favorable
terms or at all. Finally, even if we prevail in any litigation, the remedy may not be commercially meaningful or fully compensate us for the harm we suffer
or the costs we incur. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are or may become involved in legal proceedings that, if adversely adjudicated or settled, could impact our business and financial condition.
From time to time, we are named in lawsuits or other legal proceedings relating to our respective businesses. Some of these matters involve commercial or
contractual disputes, intellectual property claims, legal compliance, personal injury claims, and employment claims. As with all legal proceedings, no
assurances can be given as to the outcome of these matters. Moreover, legal proceedings can be expensive and time consuming, and we may not be
successful in defending or prosecuting these lawsuits, which could result in settlements or damages that could significantly impact our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Completion of the Merger and the WH Acquisition and the Integration of the Company and Former Caesars and William
Hill
We may fail to consummate the WH Acquisition or may not consummate it on the terms described herein.
On September 30, 2020, we announced that we had reached an agreement with William Hill plc on the terms of a recommended cash acquisition pursuant
to which we would acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital (other than shares owned by us or held in treasury) of William Hill plc, in an all-
cash transaction of approximately £2.9 billion, or $3.7 billion (the “WH Acquisition”). While we received the approval of William Hill plc shareholders
and obtained the early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”), the WH
Acquisition remains subject to gaming regulatory approvals. See “The WH Acquisition is subject to the receipt of governmental approvals that may impose
conditions that could have an adverse effect on us or, if not obtained, could prevent consummation of the WH Acquisition.” As a result, the possible timing
and likelihood of the completion of the WH Acquisition are uncertain, and, accordingly, there can be no assurance that such acquisition will be completed
on the expected terms, anticipated schedule or at all.
In the event that we fail to consummate the WH Acquisition, we will have issued a significant number of additional shares of common stock and we will
not have acquired the revenue generating assets that will be required to produce the earnings and cash flow we anticipated. As a result, failure to
consummate the WH Acquisition would adversely affect our earnings per share and our ability to make distributions to stockholders. If the WH Acquisition
is not consummated, we could be subject to a number of risks that may adversely affect our business and the market price of our common stock, including:
22
• we will be required to pay costs relating to the WH Acquisition, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory and printing fees, whether or not the
•
•
WH Acquisition is consummated;
time and resources committed by our management to matters relating to the WH Acquisition could otherwise have been devoted to pursuing other
beneficial opportunities;
the market price of our common stock could decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the WH
Acquisition will be consummated; and
• we would not realize the benefits we expect to realize from consummating the WH Acquisition.
Any increased costs associated with the delay or abandonment of the WH Acquisition, in addition to the impact of COVID-19, may adversely impact our
ability to remain in compliance with our covenants contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness and lease obligations, and our liquidity.
Moreover, if the WH Acquisition is not consummated, our reputation in our industry and in the investment community could be damaged, and the market
price of our common stock could decline.
The WH Acquisition is subject to the receipt of governmental approvals that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on us or, if not
obtained, could prevent consummation of the WH Acquisition.
Consummation of the WH Acquisition remains subject to gaming regulatory approvals, including, without limitation, including, among others, the Gaming
Board For the Bahamas, Indiana Gaming Commission, Nevada Gaming Control Board and Gaming Commission, and New Jersey Division of Gaming
Enforcement. Additionally, the combination requires the English High Court's final approval and administrative and post-closing approvals from other US
and international agencies. There can be no assurance that these approvals will be obtained and that the other conditions to consummating the WH
Acquisition will be satisfied.
In addition, the governmental authorities from which the regulatory approvals are required may impose conditions on the consummation of the WH
Acquisition or require changes to the terms of the WH Acquisition or agreements to be entered into in connection with the WH Acquisition. Such
conditions or changes and the process of obtaining regulatory approvals could have the effect of delaying or impeding consummation of the WH
Acquisition or of imposing additional costs or limitations on us following consummation of the WH Acquisition, any of which might have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The integration of the Company and Former Caesars and William Hill may present significant challenges. We cannot be sure that we will be able to
realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger and the WH Acquisition in the anticipated time frame or at all.
Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger and the WH Acquisition will significantly depends on our ability to integrate the businesses of
Former Caesars and William Hill into the Company in the anticipated time frame or at all. The combination of independent businesses is a complex, costly
and time-consuming process. As a result, we are required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating the business practices and
operations of Former Caesars into those of the Company and we expect that our acquisition of William Hill will present similar challenges. The integration
process may disrupt the businesses and, if implemented ineffectively or inefficiently, would preclude realization of the full benefits expected by us. The
failure to successfully integrate Former Caesars and William Hill into the Company and to manage the challenges presented by the integration process
successfully may result in an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the business of the Company, which may have the effect of depressing the market
price of our common stock.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our strategies, objectives
and plans for future development or acquisitions of properties or operations, as well as expectations, future operating results, trends and other information
that is not historical information. When used in this report, the terms or phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “expects,”
“might,” “may,” “estimates,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “will likely continue,” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. Specifically, forward-looking statements may include, among others, statements concerning:
•
•
•
the impact of COVID-19 on our business and financial condition;
projections of future results of operations or financial condition;
our ability to consummate the acquisition of William Hill and the announced dispositions of certain of our properties, including required
divestitures of certain properties located in Indiana and MontBleu;
23
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
expectations regarding our business and results of operations of our existing casino properties and prospects for future development;
expectations regarding trends that will affect our markets and the gaming industry generally, including expansion of internet betting and gaming,
and the impact of those trends on our business and results of operations;
our ability to comply with the covenants in the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness and leases;
our ability to meet our projected debt service obligations, operating expenses, and maintenance capital expenditures;
expectations regarding availability of capital resources;
our intention to pursue development opportunities and additional acquisitions and divestitures;
our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Former Caesars, William Hill and future development, acquisition and
partnership opportunities; and
the impact of regulation on our business and our ability to receive and maintain necessary approvals for our existing properties and future projects
and operation of online sportsbook, poker and gaming.
Any forward-looking statements are based upon underlying assumptions, including any assumptions mentioned with the specific statements, as of the date
such statements were made. Such assumptions are in turn based upon internal estimates and analyses of market conditions and trends, management plans
and strategies, economic conditions and other factors. Such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and
uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and are subject to change. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties
because they relate to events and depend upon future circumstances that may not occur. Actual results and trends may differ materially from any future
results, trends, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made,
and we assume no duty to update forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other
person that the forward-looking statements will be achieved. Undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements. Some of the
contingencies and uncertainties to which any forward-looking statement contained herein are subject include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the extent and duration of the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s business, financial results and liquidity;
the impact and cost of, and our ability to adapt to, evolving operating procedures in response to continued developments with COVID-19;
the impact of actions we have undertaken to reduce costs and improve efficiencies to mitigate losses as a result of the COVID-19 public health
emergency, which could negatively impact guest loyalty and our ability to attract and retain our employees;
the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency and resulting unemployment and changes in general economic conditions on discretionary
consumer spending and customer demand;
our substantial indebtedness and significant financial commitments, including our obligations under our lease arrangements, could adversely affect
our results of operations and our ability to service such obligations, react to changes in our markets and pursue development and acquisition
opportunities;
restrictions and limitations in agreements governing our debt and leased properties could significantly affect our ability to operate our business and
our liquidity;
risks relating to payment of a significant portion of our cash flow as debt service and rent under the leases of our casino properties with VICI and
GLPI;
financial, operational, regulatory or other potential challenges that may arise as a result of leasing of a number of our properties;
our ability to adapt to the very competitive environments we operate in as we face increasing competition, including through legalization of online
betting and gaming;
uncertainty regarding the expansion of online betting and gaming, including the impact of such expansion on our brick-and-mortar business and
our ability to compete in the online market;
24
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the ability to identify suitable acquisition opportunities and realize growth and cost synergies from any future acquisitions;
the impact of governmental regulation on our business and the cost of complying or the impact of failing to comply with such regulations;
changes in gaming taxes and fees in jurisdictions in which we operate;
risks relating to pending claims or future claims that may be brought against us;
changes in interest rates and capital and credit markets;
our ability to comply with certain covenants in our debt documents and lease arrangements;
our ability to collect gaming receivables from our credit customers;
the effect of disruptions or corruption to our information technology and other systems and infrastructure;
the effect of seasonal fluctuations;
our particular sensitivity to energy prices;
deterioration in our reputation or the reputation of our brands;
our ability to attract and retain customers;
our ability to protect the intellectual property rights we own;
our ability to expand our sportsbook business and engage in online sportsbook, casino gaming and poker;
• weather or road conditions limiting access to our properties;
•
•
the effect of war, terrorist activity, acts of violence, natural disasters, public health emergencies and other catastrophic events;
the intense competition to attract and retain management and key employees in the gaming industry; and
• Other factors described in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained herein and our reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
In addition, the acquisition of William Hill and the announced dispositions of certain of our properties, including required divestitures, create additional
risks, uncertainties and other important factors, including but not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the possibility that the proposed transactions are not consummated when expected or at all because required regulatory or other approvals are not
received or other conditions to the consummation thereof are not satisfied on a timely basis or at all;
the possibility that one or more of such transactions do not close on the terms described herein or that we are required to modify aspects of one or
more of such transactions to obtain, or otherwise take action to satisfy conditions imposed in connection with, required regulatory approvals;
risks associated with increased leverage as a result of the proposed acquisition of William Hill;
the possibility that the anticipated benefits of the proposed transactions are not realized when expected or at all;
the incurrence of significant transaction and acquisition-related costs and the possibility that the transactions may be more expensive to complete
than expected;
competitive responses to the proposed transactions;
legislative, regulatory and economic developments;
the ability to retain certain of our key employees and William Hills’ key employees;
the outcome of legal proceedings that may be instituted as a result of the proposed transactions;
25
•
•
•
•
the impact of the proposed transactions, or the failure to consummate the proposed transactions, on our stock price;
diversion of management’s attention from our ongoing operations;
the impact of the announcement or consummation of the proposed transactions on the Company’s relationships with third parties, which may
make it more difficult to maintain business relationships; and
other risks and uncertainties described in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained herein and our reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-
K filed with the SEC.
In light of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur. These forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date on which this statement is made, even if subsequently made available on our website or otherwise, and we do not
intend to update publicly any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which the statement is made, except
as may be required by law.
You should also be aware that while we from time to time communicate with securities analysts, we do not disclose to them any material non-public
information, internal forecasts or other confidential business information. Therefore, you should not assume that we agree with any statement or report
issued by any analyst, irrespective of the content of the statement or report. To the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain projections,
forecasts or opinions, those reports are not our responsibility and are not endorsed by us.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
As of December 31, 2020, the following are our properties, including those that were sold during the year. All amounts are approximations.
Property
Location
Casino
Space–
Sq. Ft.
Slot
Machines
Table
Games
Hotel
Rooms and
Suites
(a)
(a)
(a)
Las Vegas Segment
Owned-Domestic
Bally’s Las Vegas
The Cromwell
Flamingo Las Vegas
The LINQ Hotel & Casino
Paris Las Vegas
Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino
Leased
Caesars Palace Las Vegas
Harrah’s Las Vegas
Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
Regional Segment
Owned-Domestic
Circus Circus Reno
Eldorado Gaming Scioto Downs
Eldorado Resort Casino Reno
Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport
Grand Victoria Casino
Hoosier Park
Indiana Grand
Isle of Capri Casino Boonville
Isle of Capri Casino Hotel Lake Charles
Isle of Capri Casino Kansas City
Isle of Capri Casino Lula
Isle Casino Hotel - Black Hawk
(a)
(d)
(a)
(b)
(c)
68,400
41,600
72,300
36,300
95,300
64,500
124,200
88,800
117,300
63,100
142,000
71,500
28,900
36,700
55,300
80,100
26,000
26,200
39,800
57,000
28,900
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Reno, NV
Columbus, OH
Reno, NV
Shreveport, LA
Elgin, IL
Anderson, IN
Shelbyville, IN
Boonville, MO
Westlake, LA
Kansas City, MO
Lula, MS
Black Hawk, CO
26
890
350
1,090
710
950
1,070
1,560
1,310
1,050
350
2,160
790
810
1,090
1,480
1,090
860
1,180
890
860
850
70
50
90
50
100
110
170
90
70
—
—
30
30
30
30
60
20
50
10
20
20
2,810
190
3,450
2,240
2,920
2,500
3,970
2,540
2,520
1,570
—
810
400
—
—
—
140
490
—
490
400
Property
(e)
(g)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(d)
(a)(f)
(a)(e)(h)
Isle Casino Racing Pompano Park
Lady Luck Casino - Black Hawk
Lady Luck Casino Vicksburg
Silver Legacy Resort Casino
Tropicana Evansville
Leased
Bally’s Atlantic City
Belle of Baton Rouge Casino & Hotel
Caesars Atlantic City
Caesars Southern Indiana
Harrah’s Atlantic City
Harrah’s Council Bluffs
Harrah’s Gulf Coast
Harrah’s Joliet
Harrah’s Lake Tahoe
(a)
Harrah’s Laughlin
Harrah’s Louisiana Downs
Harrah’s Metropolis
Harrah’s New Orleans
Harrah’s North Kansas City
Harrah’s Philadelphia
Harrah’s Reno
Harveys Lake Tahoe
Horseshoe Bossier City
Horseshoe Council Bluffs
Horseshoe Hammond
Horseshoe Tunica
Isle Casino Bettendorf
(k)
Isle Casino Waterloo
Lumière Place Casino
MontBleu Casino Resort & Spa
Trop Casino Greenville
Tropicana Casino and Resort, Atlantic City
Tropicana Laughlin Hotel & Casino
(a)(e)(h)
(a)(h)(i)
(a)(j)
(b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(k)
Managed, International, CIE Segment
(a)(h)
(a)(h)
(a)(h)
(a)(h)
(a)(h)
(a)(h)
Owned-International
Caesars Cairo
Ramses Casino
Emerald Casino Resort
Alea Glasgow
Alea Nottingham
The Empire Casino
(a)(h)
Manchester235
Playboy Club London
Rendezvous Brighton
The Sportsman
Managed
Harrah’s Ak-Chin
Harrah’s Cherokee
Harrah’s Cherokee Valley River
Harrah’s Resort Southern California
(a)(h)
(a)(h)
(a)(h)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
Casino
Space–
Sq. Ft.
Slot
Machines
Table
Games
Hotel
Rooms and
Suites
45,000
14,900
25,000
90,100
46,300
127,200
28,500
113,400
74,400
156,300
21,400
31,900
39,000
53,600
56,400
12,000
24,300
101,100
60,100
110,500
42,800
46,700
28,300
59,900
116,500
63,000
35,500
37,400
75,000
40,500
22,800
121,900
43,700
6,500
2,700
37,400
22,000
15,200
20,400
—
10,000
15,000
5,800
65,200
191,800
65,000
72,900
800
380
580
800
720
1,760
350
2,130
660
2,040
480
630
1,090
770
600
820
450
1,380
770
2,270
590
310
1,140
1,370
1,260
980
640
600
1,330
210
340
2,360
560
30
40
410
50
50
150
40
20
60
40
830
2,100
700
1,110
20
10
—
30
20
120
10
150
80
160
20
30
30
60
40
—
20
100
60
70
20
50
70
60
110
100
20
20
20
10
10
120
10
20
20
20
20
10
40
30
20
20
10
20
160
180
50
—
—
90
1,680
—
1,210
290
1,140
500
2,590
250
500
200
510
1,510
—
260
450
390
—
930
740
600
150
—
510
510
190
490
440
—
2,360
1,490
—
—
190
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
530
1,110
180
1,090
Location
Pompano Beach, FL
Black Hawk, CO
Vicksburg, MS
Reno, NV
Evansville, IN
Atlantic City, NJ
Baton Rouge, LA
Atlantic City, NJ
Elizabeth, IN
Atlantic City, NJ
Council Bluffs, IA
Biloxi, MS
Joliet, IL
Lake Tahoe, NV
Laughlin, NV
Bossier City, LA
Metropolis, IL
New Orleans, LA
N. Kansas City, MO
Chester, PA
Reno, NV
Lake Tahoe, NV
Bossier City, LA
Council Bluffs, IA
Hammond, IN
Tunica, MS
Bettendorf, IA
Waterloo, IA
St. Louis, MO
Stateline, NV
Greenville, MS
Atlantic City, NJ
Laughlin, NV
Egypt
Egypt
South Africa
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Phoenix, AZ
Cherokee, NC
Murphy, NC
Funner, CA
27
Property
(a)(l)
Horseshoe Baltimore
Caesars Windsor
Kings & Queens Casino
Caesars Dubai
(a)
(a)
(a)
Location
Baltimore, MD
Canada
Egypt
United Arab Emirates
Casino
Space–
Sq. Ft.
133,300
100,000
2,100
—
Slot
Machines
Table
Games
Hotel
Rooms and
Suites
1,900
470
30
—
210
—
10
—
—
—
—
580
____________________
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
These properties were acquired from the Merger with Former Caesars on July 20, 2020.
In April 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Eldorado Shreveport and MontBleu. The sale of Eldorado Shreveport closed on December 23, 2020, and the sale of MontBleu
is expected to close in the first half of 2021. As of December 31, 2020, MontBleu's assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale.
Hurricane Laura caused severe damage to Isle of Capri Casino Hotel Lake Charles (“Lake Charles”). Lake Charles has been temporarily closed since the end of August 2020 due to
damages. The property remains closed until construction of a new land-based casino is complete.
Kansas City and Vicksburg were sold on July 1, 2020.
On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Tropicana Evansville, which is expected to close mid-2021 and on December 24, 2020, the Company entered into an
agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana, which is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021. In addition, the Company plans to enter into an agreement to divest of Horseshoe
Hammond prior to December 31, 2021, as the deadline was extended by the Indiana Gaming Commission. As of December 31, 2020, Evansville’s assets and liabilities were classified as
held for sale.
Bally's Atlantic City was sold on November 18, 2020.
On December 1, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Belle of Baton Rouge to Casino Queen Holdings, which is expected to close in mid-2021. As of December 31, 2020,
Belle of Baton Rouge's assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale.
As a result of the Merger, these properties met the requirements for presentation as discontinued operations and held for sale as of December 31, 2020.
On September 3, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, which is expected to close in the first half of 2021.
Harrah’s Reno was sold on September 30, 2020.
On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into agreement with GLPI to exchange real estate relating to Isle Casino Bettendorf and Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo for the real estate relating
to Evansville. The exchange closed on December 18, 2020.
As of December 31, 2020, Horseshoe Baltimore was 44.3% owned and held as an equity-method investment.
In addition to our properties listed above, other domestic and international properties, including Harrah’s Northern California, are authorized to use the
brands and marks of Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Other properties of ours include The LINQ Promenade, next to The LINQ Hotel & Casino (the “LINQ”) and the CAESARS FORUM conference center in
our Las Vegas segment. The LINQ Promenade is an open-air dining, entertainment, and retail promenade located on the east side of the Las Vegas Strip
that features the High Roller, a 550-foot observation wheel, and the Fly LINQ Zipline attraction. The CAESARS FORUM is a 550,000 square feet
conference center with 300,000 square feet of flexible meeting space, two of the largest pillarless ballrooms in the world and direct access to the LINQ.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
For a discussion of our “Legal Proceedings,” refer to Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements located elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-
K.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
28
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “CZR”. As of February 22, 2021, there were approximately 341 holders of
record of our common stock.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain all of our earnings to finance the development of our business, and thus, do
not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Payment of any cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion
of our Board and will depend upon, among other things, our future earnings, operations and capital requirements, our general financial condition, general
business conditions and restrictions that may be in place under our borrowing arrangements or existing lease agreements.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
We maintain long-term incentive plans which allow for granting stock-based compensation awards for directors, employees, officers, and consultants or
advisers who render services to the Company or its subsidiaries, based on Company Common Stock, including performance-based and incentive stock
options, restricted stock or restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance stock units, market-based stock units (“MSUs”), stock appreciation rights, and
other stock-based awards or dividend equivalents. See Note 15 for a description of our stock-based compensation plans.
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2020, with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities that we have
authorized for issuance.
Plan Category
Number of securities to be
issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
(1)
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted average
exercise price
of outstanding options,
(2)
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
3,537,404 $
22.57
5,614,787
___________________
(1)
Includes (a) 176,724 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options with a weighted-average exercise price of $22.57 (of which, 111,478 shares were assumed
through the Merger with a weighted-average exercise price of $28.91), and (b) 3,360,680 unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance stock units (“PSUs”), and market-based
units (“MSUs”), (of which 2,001,953 RSUs and MSUs were assumed through the Merger).
RSUs, PSUs, and MSUs do not have an exercise price and therefore are not included in the calculation of the weighted-average exercise price.
(2)
Common Stock Offerings
On June 19, 2020, we completed the public offering of 20,700,000 shares (including the shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ overallotment option) of
Company Common Stock, at an offering price of $39.00 per share, which provided $772 million of proceeds, net of fees and estimated expenses of
$35 million.
On October 1, 2020, we completed the public offering of 35,650,000 shares (including the shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ overallotment option)
of Company Common Stock, at an offering price of $56.00 per share, which provided $1.9 billion of proceeds, net of fees and estimated expenses of
$50 million.
Share Repurchase Program
In November 2018, our Board authorized a common stock repurchase program of up to $150 million of stock (the “Share Repurchase Program”) pursuant
to which we may, from time to time, repurchase shares of common stock on the open market (either with or without a 10b5-1 plan) or through privately
negotiated transactions. The Share Repurchase Program has no time limit and may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice. There is no
minimum number of shares of common stock that we are required to repurchase under the Share Repurchase Program.
As of December 31, 2020, we have acquired 223,823 shares of common stock under this program since 2018 at an aggregate value of $9 million and an
average of $40.80 per share. No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.
29
Transactions Related to Convertible Notes issued by Former Caesars
Former Caesars issued $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of 5% convertible senior notes maturing in 2024 (the “5% Convertible Notes”). The 5%
Convertible Notes are convertible into the weighted average of the number of shares of Company Common Stock and amount of cash actually received per
share by holders of common stock of Former Caesars that made elections for consideration in the Merger. As of December 31, 2020, we have paid
approximately $903 million and issued approximately 10.8 million shares related to conversions of the 5% Convertible Notes and the remaining
outstanding balance could result in the additional issuance of an aggregate of 4.5 million shares of Company Common Stock.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph demonstrates a comparison of cumulative total returns of the Company, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (“S&P 500”) and the
Dow Jones US Gambling Index for the period since our common stock began trading on September 22, 2014. The following graph assumes $100 invested
in each of the above groups and the reinvestment of dividends, if applicable.
Past stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The performance graph should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference
into any other of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act of 1934, unless we specifically incorporate the performance graph by
reference therein.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Not used.
30
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Caesars Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (“ERI” or “Eldorado”), is referred to as the “Company,”
“CEI,” “Caesars,” or the “Registrant,” and together with its subsidiaries may also be referred to as “we,” “us” or “our.”
We also refer to (i) our Consolidated Financial Statements as our “Financial Statements,” (ii) our Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as our “Statements of Operations,” (iii) our Consolidated Balance Sheets as our “Balance
Sheets,” and (iv) our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as our “Statements of Cash Flows.” References to numbered “Notes” refer to Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.
Objective
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to be a narrative explanation of the
financial statements and other statistical data that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements to enhance an investor’s
understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations. Our objectives are: (i) to provide a narrative explanation
of our financial statements that will enable investors to see the Company through the eyes of management; (ii) to enhance the overall financial disclosure
and provide the context within which financial information should be analyzed; and (iii) to provide information about the quality of, and potential
variability of, our earnings and cash flows so that investors can ascertain the likelihood that past performance is indicative of future performance.
Overview
We are a geographically diversified gaming and hospitality company that was founded in 1973 by the Carano family with the opening of the Eldorado
Hotel Casino in Reno, Nevada. We partnered with MGM Resorts International to build Silver Legacy Resort Casino in Reno, Nevada in 1993 and,
beginning in 2005, we grew through a series of acquisitions, including the acquisition of Eldorado Shreveport in 2005, MTR Gaming Group, Inc. in 2014,
Circus Circus Reno (“Circus Reno”) and the 50% membership interest in the Silver Legacy that was owned by MGM Resorts International in 2015, Isle of
Capri Casinos, Inc. (“Isle” or “Isle of Capri”) in 2017 and Grand Victoria Casino (“Elgin”) and Tropicana Entertainment, Inc. (“Tropicana”) in 2018. Prior
to the Merger (as defined below), we operated 23 gaming facilities in 11 states, with no international operations, featuring approximately 23,900 slot
machines, video lottery terminals (“VLTs”) and e-tables, approximately 660 table games and approximately 11,300 hotel rooms.
On July 20, 2020, we completed the merger with Caesars Entertainment Corporation (“Former Caesars”) pursuant to which Former Caesars became our
wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, we currently own, lease or manage an aggregate of 54 domestic properties in 16 states
with approximately 54,600 slot machines, VLTs and e-tables, approximately 3,200 table games and approximately 47,700 hotel rooms as of December 31,
2020. We also have international operations in five countries outside of the U.S. In addition, we have other domestic and international properties that are
authorized to use the brands and marks of Caesars Entertainment, Inc., as well as other non-gaming properties. Upon completion of our previously
announced sales, or expected sales, of certain gaming properties, we expect that we will continue to own, lease or manage 48 properties. Our primary
source of revenue is generated by gaming operations, and we utilize hotels, restaurants, bars, entertainment, racing, sportsbook offerings, retail shops and
other services to attract customers to our properties.
In connection with the Merger, Caesars Entertainment Corporation changed its name to “Caesars Holdings, Inc.” and Eldorado Resorts, Inc. converted into
a Delaware corporation and changed its name to “Caesars Entertainment, Inc.” In addition, effective as of July 21, 2020 our ticker symbol on the NASDAQ
Stock Market changed from “ERI” to “CZR”. In connection with the Merger, we also entered into a Master Transaction Agreement (the “MTA”) with VICI
Properties L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“VICI”), pursuant to which, among other things, we agreed to consummate certain sale and leaseback
transactions and amend certain lease agreements with VICI and/or its affiliates, with respect to certain property described in the MTA. See Note 3 for
further discussion of the Merger and related transactions.
As of December 31, 2020, we owned 20 of our casinos and leased 29 casinos in the U.S. We have leases with GLP Capital, L.P., the operating partnership
of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (“GLPI”), including our Master Lease that we entered into in connection with the acquisition of Tropicana on
October 1, 2018 (as amended, the “GLPI Master Lease”) and our Lumière lease. Eight of the leased casinos are subject to leases with GLPI, and we lease
an additional 21 casinos from other third parties, including VICI. See descriptions under the “GLPI Master Lease” and “VICI Leases.”
31
We periodically divest assets that we do not consider core to our business to raise capital or, in some cases, to comply with conditions, terms, obligations or
restrictions imposed by antitrust, gaming and other regulatory entities. A summary of recently completed and planned divestitures of our properties as of
December 31, 2020 is as follows:
Segment
Property
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Presque Isle Downs & Casino (“Presque”)
Lady Luck Casino Nemacolin (“Nemacolin”)
Mountaineer Casino, Racetrack and Resort (“Mountaineer”)
Isle Casino Cape Girardeau (“Cape Girardeau”)
Lady Luck Casino Caruthersville (“Caruthersville”)
Isle of Capri Casino Kansas City (“Kansas City”)
Lady Luck Casino Vicksburg (“Vicksburg”)
Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport (“Eldorado Shreveport”)
MontBleu Casino Resort & Spa (“MontBleu”)
Tropicana Evansville (“Evansville”)
Belle of Baton Rouge Casino & Hotel (“Baton Rouge”)
Date Sold
January 11, 2019
March 8, 2019
December 6, 2019
December 6, 2019
December 6, 2019
July 1, 2020
July 1, 2020
December 23, 2020
N/A
N/A
N/A
(a)
(a)
(d)
(c)
(b)
(b)
Discontinued operations (e):
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Managed, International,
CIE
Managed, International,
CIE
Harrah’s Reno
Bally’s Atlantic City
Harrah’s Louisiana Downs
Caesars Southern Indiana
Horseshoe Hammond
Emerald Resort & Casino
Caesars Entertainment UK
(f)
(g)
September 30, 2020
November 18, 2020
N/A
N/A
N/A
(c)(i)
(h)
(c)
N/A
N/A
Location
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
West Virginia
Missouri
Missouri
Missouri
Mississippi
Louisiana
Nevada
Indiana
Louisiana
Nevada
New Jersey
Louisiana
Indiana
Indiana
South Africa
United Kingdom
(a)
(b)
(c)
We closed the sales of Kansas City and Vicksburg on July 1, 2020 and recorded a gain of approximately $8 million during the year ended
December 31, 2020.
On April 24, 2020, we entered into a definitive purchase agreement with Twin River Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (“Twin River” or “Bally’s
Corporation”) and certain of its affiliates for the sale of the equity interests of Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport Joint Venture and Columbia
Properties Tahoe, LLC, the entities that hold Eldorado Shreveport and MontBleu, respectively, for aggregate consideration of $155 million, subject
to a customary working capital adjustment. The definitive agreement provides that the consummation of the sale is subject to satisfaction of
customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. The sale of Eldorado Shreveport closed on December 23, 2020 for
$140 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment and we recognized a gain of approximately $29 million during the year ended
December 31, 2020. The sale of MontBleu is expected to close in the first half of 2021. MontBleu met the requirements for presentation as assets
held for sale as of December 31, 2020. However, the pending divestitures of MontBleu did not meet the requirements for presentation as
discontinued operations and MontBleu’s results of operations are included in income from continuing operations in the periods presented. As a
result of the agreement to sell MontBleu, an impairment charge totaling $45 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 due
to the carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds from the sale.
In connection with its review of the Merger, the Indiana Gaming Commission determined on July 16, 2020 that, as a condition to their approval of
the Merger, we are required to enter into agreements to divest of three properties within the state of Indiana in order to avoid undue economic
concentration. On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Evansville to GLPI and Twin River for $480 million in cash,
subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required
regulatory approvals and is expected to close in mid-2021. In addition, on December 24, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to divest
of Caesars Southern Indiana (See (i) below). We expect to enter into an agreement to sell Horseshoe Hammond prior to December 31, 2021, as the
deadline was extended by the Indiana Gaming Commission. Evansville met the requirements for presentation as assets held for sale as of
December 31, 2020, while Caesars Southern Indiana and Horseshoe Hammond met the requirements for presentation as held for sale and
discontinued operations.
32
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
On December 1, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Baton Rouge to CQ Holding Company, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the
GLPI Master Lease, Baton Rouge will be removed from the GLPI Master Lease, and the rent payments to GLPI will remain unchanged. GLPI will
retain ownership of the real estate of Baton Rouge. As a result of the agreement to sell Baton Rouge, an impairment charge totaling $50 million
was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds. The transaction is
expected to close in mid-2021 and is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.
These Former Caesars properties met held for sale criteria as of the acquisition date. The sales of these properties have or are expected to close
within one year from the date of the closing of the Merger and the properties are classified as discontinued operations.
On September 30, 2020, the Company and VICI completed the sale of Harrah’s Reno to and affiliate of CAI Investments for $42 million. The
proceeds from the sale were split between the Company and VICI, and the Company received $8 million of net proceeds.
On November 18, 2020, the Company and VICI completed the sale of Bally's Atlantic City to Bally’s Corporation for $25 million. The proceeds
from the sale were split between the Company and VICI, and the Company received $5 million of net proceeds. As a result of the sale, the
Company agreed to reimburse Bally’s Corporation $30 million for capital expenditures required at Bally’s Atlantic City and recorded a liability
within Accrued other liabilities and recorded a charge to Discontinued operations, net of income taxes. Our commitment will be satisfied by
adjusting obligations under certain sportsbook operating agreements between Bally’s Corporation and the Company following our expected
acquisition of William Hill. In addition, on October 9, 2020, we reached an agreement to sell the Bally’s brand to Bally’s Corporation for
$20 million, while retaining the right to use the brand within Bally’s Las Vegas into perpetuity.
On September 3, 2020, the Company and VICI entered into an agreement with Rubico Acquisition Corp. to sell Harrah’s Louisiana Downs for
$22 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment, where the proceeds will be split between the Company and VICI. The sale is
subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the first half of 2021.
On December 24, 2020, the Company entered into agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (“EBCI”)
for $250 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. Caesar’s annual payments to VICI under the Regional Lease will decline by
$33 million upon closing of the transaction. Additionally, effective as of the closing of the transaction, Caesars and EBCI will enter into a long-
term agreement for the continued use of the Caesars brand and Caesars Rewards loyalty program at Caesars Southern Indiana. The sale is subject
to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021.
Merger and Acquisitions Related Activities
Merger with Caesars Entertainment Corporation
On July 20, 2020, the Merger was consummated and Former Caesars became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. The strategic rationale for the Merger
includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Creation of the largest owner, operator and manager of domestic gaming assets;
•
• Diversification of the Company’s domestic footprint;
• Access to iconic brands, rewards programs and new gaming opportunities expected to enhance customer experience; and
•
Realization of significant identified synergies.
Based on the closing price of $38.24 per share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“Company Common Stock”), reported on
the NASDAQ Stock Market on July 20, 2020, the aggregate implied value of the aggregate merger consideration paid to former holders of Former Caesars
common stock in connection with the Merger was approximately $8.5 billion, including approximately $2.4 billion in the Company Common Stock and
approximately $6.1 billion in cash. The aggregate merger consideration transferred also included approximately $2.4 billion related to the repayment of
certain outstanding debt balances of Former Caesars and approximately $48 million of other consideration paid, which includes $19 million related to a
transaction success fee, for the benefit of Former Caesars, and $29 million for the replacement of equity awards of certain employees attributable to
services provided prior to the Merger.
33
Pursuant to the Merger, each share of Former Caesars common stock was converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof and
subject to proration, approximately $12.41 of cash consideration or approximately 0.3085 shares of Company Common Stock, with a value equal to
approximately $12.41 in cash (based on the volume weighted average price per share of Company Common Stock for the 10 trading days ending on July
16, 2020). Following the consummation of the Merger, stockholders of the Company and stockholders of Former Caesars held approximately 61% and
39%, respectively, of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock.
We recognized acquisition-related transaction costs in connection with the Merger of $160 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, and $80 million
for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Tropicana Entertainment Inc.
On October 1, 2018, we acquired Tropicana in a cash transaction valued at $1.9 billion (the “Tropicana Acquisition”). At the closing of the transaction
Tropicana became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. Immediately prior to our acquisition, Tropicana sold Tropicana Aruba Resort and GLP Capital, L.P.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI, acquired substantially all of Tropicana’s real estate, other than the real estate underlying MontBleu and Lumière, for
approximately $964 million. We acquired the real estate underlying Lumière for $246 million with the proceeds of a $246 million loan from GLPI. We
funded the remaining consideration payable with our cash on hand and cash on hand at Tropicana, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and
proceeds from our offering of $600 million of 6% senior notes due 2026.
Substantially concurrently with the acquisition of the real estate portfolio by GLPI, we entered into a triple net master lease for the Tropicana properties
acquired by GLPI (“GLPI Master Lease”). The initial annual rent under the terms of the lease was approximately $88 million and is subject to annual
escalation. We do not have the ability to terminate the obligations under the Master Lease prior to its expiration without GLPI’s consent.
In connection with the purchase of the real estate related to Lumière, Tropicana St. Louis RE LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, and GLPI entered
into a loan agreement, dated as of October 1, 2018 (the “Lumière Loan”), relating to a loan of $246 million by GLPI to Tropicana St. Louis RE to fund the
purchase price of the real estate underlying Lumière. The Lumière Loan was guaranteed by us, bore interest at a rate equal to 9.27% and had a maturity
date of October 1, 2020. On June 24, 2020, the Company received approval from Missouri Gaming Commission to sell the real estate underlying Lumière
to GLPI and leaseback the property under a long-term financing obligation. As of December 31, 2020, the Lumière loan has been satisfied in full and the
real estate has been refinanced under a financing obligation.
Grand Victoria Casino
On August 7, 2018, we completed the acquisition (the “Elgin Acquisition”) of the Grand Victoria Casino (“Elgin”) in Elgin, Illinois. We purchased Elgin
for $329 million, including a working capital adjustment totaling $1 million. The Elgin Acquisition was financed using cash on hand and borrowings under
the Company’s revolving credit facility.
Partnerships and Acquisition Opportunities
William Hill
In September 2018, we entered into a 25-year agreement, which became effective January 29, 2019, with William Hill plc and William Hill U.S. Holdco.
Inc. (“William Hill US”), its U.S. subsidiary (together, “William Hill”) pursuant to which we (i) granted to William Hill the right to conduct betting
activities, including operating sportsbooks, in retail channels and under our first skin and third skin for online channels with respect to our current and
future properties located in the United States and the territories and possessions of the United States, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and
(ii) agreed that William Hill will have the right to conduct real money online gaming activities utilizing our second skin available with respect to properties
in such territories. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we received a 20% ownership interest in William Hill US with an initial value of approximately
$129 million as well as 13 million ordinary shares of William Hill plc with an initial value of approximately $27 million upon closing of the transaction in
January 2019. We granted William Hill the right to the use of certain skins in exchange for an equity method investment. The fair value of the William Hill
US and William Hill plc shares received has been deferred and is recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the 25-year agreement term. The
amortization of deferred revenues associated with our equity interests is included in other revenue within our Corporate and Other segment. Additionally,
we receive a profit share from the operations of betting and other gaming activities associated with our properties.
On September 30, 2020, we announced that we had reached an agreement with William Hill plc on the terms of a recommended cash acquisition pursuant
to which we would acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital (other than shares owned by us or held in treasury) of William Hill plc, in an all-
cash transaction of approximately £2.9 billion, or $3.7 billion. To
34
provide liquidity to fund the cash purchase price for the proposed acquisition, we entered into various financing transactions. On September 25, 2020, we
borrowed $900 million under the CEI Revolving Credit Facility (defined below), which was fully repaid in October 2020. On October 1, 2020, we raised
an additional $1.9 billion through a public offering of Company Common Stock which was deposited into an escrow account. As of December 31, 2020,
these funds in escrow were classified as restricted cash and will remain restricted until the proposed acquisition of William Hill plc closes. In order to
manage the risk of appreciation of the GBP denominated purchase price the Company has entered into foreign exchange forward contracts.
In connection with the proposed acquisition of William Hill plc, on September 29, 2020, the Company entered into a debt financing commitment letter
pursuant to which the lenders party thereto have committed to arrange and provide a newly formed subsidiary of the Company with (a) a £1.0 billion senior
secured 540-day bridge loan facility, (b) a £116 million senior secured 540-day revolving credit facility and (c) a £503 million senior secured 60-day bridge
loan facility (collectively, the “Debt Financing”). The proceeds of the Debt Financing will be used (i) to pay a portion of the cash consideration for the
proposed acquisition, (ii) to refinance certain of William Hill plc's and its subsidiaries' existing debt, (iii) to pay fees and expenses related to the acquisition
and related transactions and (iv) for working capital and general corporate purposes.
Pending negotiation of the loan agreement for the Debt Financing, on October 6, 2020, our newly formed subsidiary entered into a £1.5 billion Interim
Facilities Agreement (the “Interim Facilities Agreement”) with Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to provide: (a) a 90-
day £1.0 billion interim asset sale bridge facility and (b) a 90-day £503 million interim cash confirmation bridge facility.
The transaction is conditioned on, among other things, the approval of William Hill plc shareholders, which was received on November 19, 2020, and
receipt of required regulatory approvals. On December 28, 2020, we obtained the early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”) relating to the proposed combination with William Hill plc. A final UK court hearing is scheduled for the
last week of March 2021 and we expect to close the acquisition shortly thereafter.
The Stars Group/Flutter Entertainment
In November 2018, the Company entered into a 20-year agreement with The Stars Group Inc. (“TSG”) pursuant to which we agreed to provide TSG with
options to obtain access to our second skin for online sports wagering and third skin for real money online gaming and poker, in each case with respect to
states in which our properties are located. Under the terms of the agreement, we received 1 million TSG common shares. The fair value of the shares
received has been deferred and is recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the 20-year agreement term. All shares are subject to a 1 year
restriction on transfer from the date they are received. On May 5, 2020, Flutter Entertainment plc (“Flutter”) completed the acquisition of all of the issued
and outstanding common shares of TSG in exchange for 0.2253 Flutter shares per common share of TSG. In addition, we receive a revenue share from the
operation of the applicable verticals by TSG under our licenses. In December 2020, the Company sold 121,285 of these Flutter shares for net proceeds of
approximately $24 million.
Reportable Segments
Segment results in this MD&A are presented consistent with the way our management assesses the operating results, assesses performance and allocates
resources of the Company, which is a consolidated view that adjusts for the effect of certain transactions related to reportable segments within the
Company. We view each property as an operating segment. Prior to the Merger, our principal operating activities occurred in five geographic regions and
reportable segments: West, Midwest, South, East and Central, in addition to Corporate and Other. Following the Merger, our principal operating activities
occur in three regionally-focused reportable segments. The Company’s reportable segments are: (1) Las Vegas, (2) Regional, and (3) Managed,
International, CIE, in addition to Corporate and Other. See Item 2. Properties for listing of properties by segment.
Presentation of Financial Information
The financial information included in this Item 7 for the period after our acquisition of Former Caesars on July 20, 2020 is not fully comparable to the
periods prior to the acquisition. In addition, the presentation of financial information included in this Item 7 for the periods after our sales and acquisitions
of various properties are not fully comparable to the periods prior to their respective sale dates.
This MD&A is intended to provide information to assist in better understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations. Our
historical operating results may not be indicative of our future results of operations because of the factors described in the preceding paragraph and the
changing competitive landscape in each of our markets, including changes in market and societal trends, as well as by factors discussed elsewhere herein.
We recommend that you read this MD&A in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
35
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior year presentations have been made to conform to the current period presentation. Marketing and promotions expense
previously disclosed for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 has been reclassified to Casino and pari-mutuel commissions expense and General
and administrative expense based on the nature of the expense.
Key Performance Metrics
Our primary source of revenue is generated by our gaming operations, but we use our hotels, restaurants, bars, entertainment, retail shops, racing,
sportsbook offerings and other services to attract customers to our properties. Our operating results are highly dependent on the volume and quality of
customers visiting and staying at our properties. Key performance metrics include volume indicators such as table games drop and slot handle, which refer
to amounts wagered by our customers. The amount of volume we retain, which is not fully controllable by us, is recognized as casino revenues and is
referred to as our win or hold. In addition, hotel occupancy and price per room designated by average daily rate (“ADR”) are key indicators for our hotel
business. Our calculation of ADR consists of the average price of occupied rooms per day including the impact of resort fees and complimentary rooms.
Complimentary room rates are determined based on an analysis of retail or cash rates for each customer segment and each type of room product to estimate
complimentary rates which are consistent with retail rates. Complimentary rates are reviewed at least annually and on an interim basis if there are
significant changes in market conditions. Complimentary rooms are treated as occupied rooms in our calculation of hotel occupancy.
Significant Factors Impacting Financial Results
The following summary highlights the significant factors impacting our financial results during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Acquisitions and Transaction Costs
•
•
•
Caesars – The Merger closed on July 20, 2020. Transaction costs related to our acquisition of Former Caesars totaled $160 million and
$80 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Tropicana – Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 include incremental revenues and expenses attributable to the seven
properties we acquired in our acquisition of Tropicana on October 1, 2018. Transaction expenses related to our acquisition of Tropicana totaled $4
million and $18 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Elgin – Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 include incremental revenues and expenses for the period of August 7,
2018 through December 31, 2018 attributable to Elgin. Transaction expenses related to our acquisition of Elgin totaled $0.2 million and $4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Divestitures and Discontinued Operations
• Divestitures – We closed the sale of Eldorado Shreveport on December 23, 2020 and recorded a gain of approximately $29 million during the year
ended December 31, 2020. We closed the sales of Kansas City and Vicksburg on July 1, 2020 and recorded a gain of approximately $8 million
during the year ended December 31, 2020. We closed the sales of Presque and Nemacolin on January 11, 2019 and March 8, 2019, respectively,
and recorded a total net gain of $22 million, substantially related to the sale of Presque. We closed the sales of Mountaineer, Cape Girardeau and
Caruthersville on December 6, 2019 and recorded a net gain of $29 million during the fourth quarter of 2019. The properties that have been sold
are collectively referred to as “Divestitures.” In conjunction with the classification of MontBleu and Baton Rouge’s operations as assets held for
sale as a result of the announced sale, impairment charges totaling $45 million and $50 million, respectively, were recorded during the year ended
December 31, 2020 due to the carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds. None of the sales listed met requirements for
presentation as discontinued operations and the results of operations of the relevant entities are included in income from continuing operations for
the periods prior to their respective closing dates.
• Discontinued Operations – As result of the Merger, Former Caesars properties, including Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, Caesars Southern Indiana,
Horseshoe Hammond, Harrah’s Reno, Caesars UK group, including Emerald Resort & Casino, and Bally’s Atlantic City, have met held for sale
criteria as of the date of the closing of the Merger. The sales of these properties have or are expected to close within one year from the date of the
closing of the Merger and the properties are classified as discontinued operations. Additionally, we closed the sale of Harrah’s Reno on September
30, 2020 and Bally’s Atlantic City on November 18, 2020. As a result of the sale of Bally’s Atlantic City, Caesars agreed to reimburse Bally’s
Corporation $30 million for capital expenditures required at Bally’s Atlantic City and recorded a liability within Accrued other liabilities and a
charge to Discontinued operations, net of income taxes. Our
36
commitment will be satisfied by adjusting obligations under certain sportsbook operating agreements between Bally’s Corporation and the
Company following our expected acquisition of William Hill.
Financing and Lease Transactions
•
•
New Debt Transactions related to the Merger – In connection with the Merger, we issued new notes, entered into a new credit agreement and
assumed certain of Former Caesars indebtedness. In addition, we terminated previously outstanding credit agreements and discharged outstanding
notes. As a result of these transactions, described more fully in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below, we recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $132 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, which is recorded within Loss on extinguishment of debt on the
Statement of Operations, as well as an additional $388 million of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to 2019. We
also recorded a net gain of $16 million on conversions related to the 5% Convertible Notes during the year ended December 31, 2020.
VICI Leases – Upon consummation of the Merger, CEI assumed obligations of certain real property assets leased from VICI by Former Caesars
under various lease agreements. We recorded interest expense of $491 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.
• GLPI Master Lease – We accounted for the GLPI Master Lease as a deferred financing obligation effective October 1, 2018. We recorded interest
expense in the amount of $104 million, $99 million and $24 million during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively,
which was in excess of the cash lease payments as we continue to accrete up the liability during the earlier periods of the GLPI Master Lease.
•
Tropicana Financing – On September 20, 2018, we issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.0% senior notes due 2026. The
proceeds from the notes were used to fund the Tropicana Acquisition which closed on October 1, 2018. We incurred $10 million of incremental
interest expense on these notes for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Other Significant Factors
•
COVID-19 Public Health Emergency – In January 2020, an outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was identified and has since
spread throughout much of the world, including the United States. All of our casino properties were temporarily closed for the period from mid-
March 2020 through mid-May 2020 due to orders issued by various government agencies and tribal bodies as part of certain precautionary
measures intended to help slow the spread of the COVID-19 public health emergency. On May 15, 2020, we began reopening our properties and
have resumed certain operations at all of our properties as of December 31, 2020, with the exception of additional temporary closures of Caesars
Windsor, Harrah’s Philadelphia, and our properties in Illinois. Subsequently, Harrah’s Philadelphia and our properties in Illinois have reopened.
The COVID-19 public health emergency has had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2020. We continued to pay our full-time employees through April 10, 2020, including tips and tokens. Effective April
11, 2020, we furloughed approximately 90% of our employees, implemented salary reductions and committed to continue to provide benefits to
our employees during the duration of their respective furlough period. A portion of our workforce has returned to service as the properties have
resumed with limited capacities and in compliance with operating restrictions imposed by governmental or tribal orders, directives, and guidelines.
Due to the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency on our results of operations, we obtained waivers on the financial covenants
in our Former Caesars credit facility agreement and the GLPI Master Lease.
The extent of the ongoing and future effects of the COVID-19 public health emergency on our business and the casino resort industry generally is
uncertain, but we expect that it will continue to have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The extent
and duration of the impact of COVID-19 on our business, results of operations and financial condition will ultimately depend on future
developments, including but not limited to, the duration and severity of the outbreak, the efficacy and availability of vaccines, restrictions on
operations imposed by governmental authorities, the potential for authorities reimposing stay at home orders or additional restrictions in response
to continued developments with the COVID-19 public health emergency, our ability to adapt to evolving operating procedures, the impact on
consumer demand and discretionary spending, the length of time it takes for demand to return and our ability to adjust our cost structures for the
duration of the outbreak’s effect on our operations.
•
Impairment Charges – As a result of declines in recent performance and the expected impact on future cash flows as a result of COVID-19, we
recognized impairment charges in our Regional segment related to goodwill and trade names totaling $100 million and $16 million, respectively,
during the year ended December 31, 2020. In addition, as a result of the agreements to sell properties in our Regional segment, as well as certain
corporate assets, impairment charges
37
totaling $99 million were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds.
• Weather and Construction Disruption – Our Regional segment was negatively impacted by severe weather, including flooding, during the first
quarter of 2019 compared to the same current year period. Additionally, our Regional segment was negatively impacted by disruption to our
casino floor and hotel availability associated with renovation projects at our Black Hawk properties during the construction period from January to
June 2019. In late August 2020, our Regional segment was negatively impacted by Hurricane Laura, causing severe damage to Isle of Capri
Casino Hotel Lake Charles (“Lake Charles”), which remains closed as the construction of a new land-based casino is in process. We recorded an
insurance receivable of $44 million, of which $15 million related to fixed asset impairments and $29 million related to remediation costs and
repairs that have been incurred during year ended December 31, 2020.
Results of Operations
The following table highlights the results of our operations:
(Dollars in millions)
Net revenues:
Las Vegas
Regional
Managed, International, CIE
Corporate and Other
(a)
Total
Net (loss) income
(b)
:
Adjusted EBITDA
Las Vegas
Regional
Managed, International, CIE
Corporate and Other
(a)
Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA
Net (loss) income margin
Adjusted EBITDA margin
(c)
$
$
$
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2018
751
$
—
$
2,545
163
15
3,474
(1,758)
133
671
34
(101)
737
(50.6)%
21.2 %
$
$
$
$
2,520
—
8
2,528
81
—
732
—
(35)
697
$
$
$
$
—
2,055
—
1
2,056
95
—
548
—
(32)
516
3.2 %
27.6 %
4.6 %
25.1 %
___________________
(a)
Corporate and Other includes revenues related to certain licensing revenue and various revenue sharing agreements. Corporate and Other expenses include corporate overhead costs,
which consist of certain expenses, such as: payroll, professional fees, travel expenses and other general and administrative expenses that do not directly relate to or have not otherwise been
allocated to a property. Expenses incurred for corporate activities that are directly attributable to a property or are otherwise incurred to support a property are allocated to each property.
See the “Supplemental Unaudited Presentation of Consolidated Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”)” discussion later in this
MD&A for a description of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of net (loss) income to Adjusted EBITDA related margins.
Net (loss) income margin is calculated as net (loss) income divided by net revenues.
(b)
(c)
Consolidated comparison of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Comparisons between 2020 and 2019 are described below. A discussion of changes in our results of operations between year ended December 31, 2019
compared to 2018 has been omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K and can be found in “Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018” of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
38
Net Revenues
Net revenues were as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Net revenues:
Years Ended December 31,
Variance
Percent Change
Variance
Percent Change
2020
2019
2018
2020 vs 2019
2019 vs 2018
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
Net Revenues
$
$
2,337 $
337
450
350
3,474 $
1,808 $
301
300
119
2,528 $
1,553 $
247
184
72
2,056 $
529
36
150
231
946
29.3 % $
12.0 %
50.0 %
194.1 %
37.4 % $
255
54
116
47
472
16.4 %
21.9 %
63.0 %
65.3 %
23.0 %
Consolidated revenues increased for the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of our acquisition of Former Caesars on July 20, 2020. This was offset
by a decline in revenues associated with the impact of COVID-19 public health emergency and, to a lesser extent, divestitures of certain properties
discussed earlier. All of our casino properties were temporarily closed for the period from mid-March 2020 through mid-May 2020 due to orders issued by
various government agencies and tribal bodies as part of certain precautionary measures intended to help slow the spread of the COVID-19 public health
emergency. On May 15, 2020, we began reopening our properties and have resumed certain operations at all of our properties as of December 31, 2020,
with the exception of additional temporary closures of Caesars Windsor, Harrah’s Philadelphia, and our properties in Illinois. Subsequently, Harrah’s
Philadelphia and our properties in Illinois have reopened. Our property in Lake Charles remains closed as a result of damage suffered in Hurricane Laura
and will remain closed until construction of a new land-based casino is complete. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency, including
local and state regulations and the implementation of social distancing and health and safety protocols, our properties are subject to reduced gaming
capacity and hotel occupancy, limited operation of food and beverage outlets, live entertainment events and conventions. As a result, gaming revenue
represents a larger portion of our total revenues following the reopening of our properties as compared to earlier periods, which we expect to continue until
such time as we are able to fully operate our non-gaming amenities following the reduction or elimination of social distancing and safety and health
protocols, and other regulatory restrictions limiting capacity and other aspects of our business.
Our diversified portfolio has yielded mixed results as the properties have reopened under the conditions noted above. Net revenues for properties which
have historically relied on a local customer base, not dependent on air travel or convention business, showed a smaller decrease as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2019 results. These properties’ gaming and hotel revenues have historically been the largest portion of their total revenue. Properties
in destination markets such as Las Vegas, Atlantic City, Northern Nevada and New Orleans, which have historically relied on a broader regional and
national customer base or convention business have declined significantly as compared to the prior year period. These destination markets were impacted
by restrictions on, and an overall decline in, air travel related to COVID-19. These properties have historically relied on a broader mix of revenue sources
including convention, entertainment, and food and beverage offerings. As a result of reduced visitation, air travel, state and local restrictions on capacity,
and social distancing and safety and health protocols, these sources of revenue have been materially reduced as compared to prior periods.
39
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses were as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Operating Expenses:
Years Ended December 31,
Variance
Percent Change
Variance
Percent Change
2020
2019
2018
2020 vs 2019
2019 vs 2018
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
$
Hotel
Other
General and administrative
Corporate
Impairment charges
Depreciation and amortization
Transaction costs and other operating
costs
1,197 $
261
170
140
882
195
215
583
268
905 $
239
99
46
503
66
1
222
37
824 $
203
65
39
381
46
14
157
17
Total operating expenses
$
3,911 $
2,118 $
1,746 $
292
22
71
94
379
129
214
361
231
1,793
32.3 % $
9.2 %
71.7 %
*
75.3 %
195.5 %
*
162.6 %
*
84.7 % $
81
36
34
7
122
20
(13)
65
20
372
9.8 %
17.7 %
52.3 %
17.9 %
32.0 %
43.5 %
(92.9)%
41.4 %
117.6 %
21.3 %
___________________
* Not meaningful.
Casino and pari-mutuel expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages associated with our gaming operations, marketing and promotions and gaming
taxes. Hotel expenses consist principally of salaries, wages and supplies associated with our hotel operations. Food and beverage expenses consist
principally of salaries and wages and costs of goods sold associated with our food and beverage operations. Other expenses consist principally of salaries
and wages and costs of goods sold associated with our retail, entertainment and other operations.
Casino and pari-mutuel, hotel, food and beverage, and other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased year over year as a result of our
acquisition of Former Caesars. This was partially offset as a result of the temporary closures of all of our properties due to the COVID-19 public health
emergency, which reduced our salaries and wages, gaming taxes, costs of goods sold, and other expenses. As discussed above, our reopened properties are
operating with reduced gaming and hotel capacity and limited food and beverage options. In addition, our properties have reduced marketing and
promotional spend, resulting in further declines in gaming expenses.
General and administrative expenses include items such as information technology, facility maintenance, utilities, property and liability insurance, expenses
for administrative departments such as accounting, compliance, purchasing, human resources, legal and internal audit, and property taxes. Property, general
and administrative expenses also include stock-based compensation expense for certain property executives, sports sponsorships and other marketing
expenses not directly related to our gaming operations.
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased year over year as the result of our acquisition of Former Caesars.
This was offset by actions taken to reduce our cost structure while our properties were temporarily closed and during the period of reduced operations due
to the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency, which are discussed above and implemented.
For the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the same prior year period, corporate expenses increased primarily due to the acquisition of Former
Caesars offset by reductions in salaries and wages due to reductions in workforce implemented as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 public health
emergency.
For the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the same prior year period, depreciation and amortization expense increased mainly due to the
acquisition of Former Caesars offset by ceasing depreciation and amortization expense on assets held for sale and the Divestitures.
For the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the same prior year period, transaction costs and other operating costs increased primarily due to costs
or fees incurred related to the Merger, various project exit fees and related write offs, and higher severance expense related to synergies associated with the
Merger.
40
Impairment charges increased by $214 million in 2020 due to impairment related to goodwill and trade names recognized due to a triggering event
resulting from the COVID-19 public health emergency as well as impairments related to our held for sale properties recognized due to the carrying value
exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds.
Other expense
Other expense was as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Other expense
Years Ended December 31,
Variance
Percent Change
Variance
Percent Change
2020
2019
2018
2020 vs 2019
2019 vs 2018
Interest expense, net
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Other (loss) income
Provision for income taxes
$
(1,174) $
(197)
176
(126)
(286) $
(8)
9
(44)
(172) $
—
(3)
(40)
(888)
(189)
167
(82)
* $
*
*
(186.4)%
(114)
(8)
12
(4)
(66.3)%
*
*
(10.0)%
___________________
* Not meaningful.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, interest expense, net increased year over year as a result of our acquisition of Former Caesars. Outstanding debt
assumed, additional debt raised, and assumed financing obligations resulted in the increase in interest expense.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the loss on extinguishment of debt increased year over year due to the early repayment of outstanding debt as a
result of our acquisition of Former Caesars.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, other (loss) income increased year over year mainly due to a gain of $169 million related to the change in the
foreign currency exchange rate associated with restricted cash held in GBP for, and a derivative contract related to, our expected acquisition of William
Hill.
The effective tax rate was (7.7%) for 2020, 35.2% for 2019, and 29.8% for 2018. The effective tax rate in 2020 differed from the statutory rate of 21%
primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets due to the series of transactions with VICI during the year.
Segment comparison for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Las Vegas Segment
(Dollars in millions)
Revenues:
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA margin
Net (loss) income attributable to Caesars
___________________
* Not meaningful.
Years Ended December 31,
Variance
Percent
Change
Variance
Percent
Change
2020
2019
2018
2020 vs 2019
2019 vs 2018
—
—
—
—
—
—
— %
—
$
$
$
$
319
130
186
116
751
133
* $
*
*
*
* $
* $
17.7 pts
—
—
—
—
—
—
(287)
* $
—
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
$
$
$
319
130
186
116
751
133
17.7 %
(287)
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
— %
—
$
$
$
$
41
Las Vegas segment’s net revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of the acquisition of Former Caesars. As of December 31, 2020, all of our
Las Vegas properties were reopened. All of our properties within the Las Vegas segment reopened with reduced gaming and hotel capacity with limited
food and beverage offerings as well as limited capacity at a few entertainment shows. As of December 31, 2020, convention venues have not reopened due
to capacity limitations.
In the period between properties reopening and December 31, 2020, all of our reopened properties in the Las Vegas segment experienced a significant
decline in net revenues and Adjusted EBITDA compared to Former Caesars’ prior year results for the same properties due to the general weakness in the
economic environment resulting from reduced visitation and travel to Las Vegas resulting from the COVID-19 public health emergency. Compared to our
Regional Segment, Adjusted EBITDA margin for our Las Vegas segment experienced a more significant negative impact from declines in revenue, as well
as rent expense associated with our Rio lease beginning in December 2019.
Regional Segment
(Dollars in millions)
Revenues:
Years Ended December 31,
Variance
Percent
Change
Variance
Percent
Change
2020
2019
2018
2020 vs 2019
2019 vs 2018
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
$
1,972
$
1,808
$
1,553
$
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA margin
Net (loss) income attributable to Caesars
206
264
103
2,545
671
26.4 %
(338)
$
$
$
301
300
111
2,520
732
29.0 %
398
$
$
$
247
184
71
2,055
548
26.7 %
320
$
$
$
$
$
$
164
(95)
(36)
(8)
25
(61)
9.1 % $
(31.6)%
(12.0)%
(7.2)%
1.0 % $
(8.3)% $
(2.6) pts
255
54
116
40
465
184
16.4 %
21.9 %
63.0 %
56.3 %
22.6 %
33.6 %
2.3 pts
(736)
(184.9)% $
78
24.4 %
Regional segment’s net revenues increased as a result of our merger with Former Caesars. Adjusted EBITDA and margin decreased for the year ended
December 31, 2020 compared to the same prior year period as a result of property closures due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. All of our
properties in our Regional segment, with the exception of Lake Charles, Harrah’s Philadelphia and our properties in Illinois reopened as of December 31,
2020. Subsequently, Harrah’s Philadelphia and our properties in Illinois have reopened. All of our properties within the Regional segment reopened with
reduced gaming and hotel capacity and with limited food and beverage offerings.
In the period between properties reopening and December 31, 2020, our Regional properties experienced a decline in net revenues as compared to the prior
year. The majority of our Regional properties other than Atlantic City, Northern Nevada and New Orleans, Adjusted EBITDA declined slightly as
compared to prior year, when including Former Caesars’ prior year, for the same properties. Adjusted EBITDA margin for these properties was higher as
compared to prior year due to operating with a reduced workforce, reducing marketing costs, and limiting certain lower margin food and beverage
offerings.
Properties in Atlantic City, Northern Nevada and New Orleans experienced significant declines in net revenues and Adjusted EBITDA as compared to prior
year and Former Caesars’ prior year for the same properties as they were all negatively impacted by reduced visitation and limitations on capacity due to
the COVID-19 public health emergency.
42
Managed, International & CIE Segment
(Dollars in millions)
Revenues:
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Other
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA margin
Net (loss) income attributable to Caesars
___________________
* Not meaningful.
Years Ended December 31,
Variance
Percent
Change
Variance
Percent
Change
2020
2019
2018
2020 vs 2019
2019 vs 2018
$
$
$
$
46
1
116
163
34
20.9 %
38
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
— %
—
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
— %
—
$
$
$
$
46
1
116
163
34
38
* $
*
*
* $
* $
20.9 pts
—
—
—
—
—
* $
—
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Managed, International, CIE segment’s net revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of the acquisition of Former Caesars. All of our managed
properties have reopened as of December 31, 2020, with the exception of Caesars Windsor. Our CIE business was not closed at any point related to the
COVID-19 public health emergency.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, net revenues for Managed, International and CIE declined as compared to Former Caesars’ prior period related to
reimbursed management costs related to Caesars Windsor remaining closed throughout the current period. Excluding that, net revenues increased primarily
related to increased revenue in our CIE business. Adjusted EBITDA for Managed, International and CIE increased as compared to Former Caesars’ prior
period.
Corporate & Other
(Dollars in millions)
Revenues:
Other
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
___________________
* Not meaningful.
Years Ended December 31,
Variance
Percent
Change
Variance
Percent
Change
2020
2019
2018
2020 vs 2019
2019 vs 2018
$
$
$
15 $
15 $
8 $
8 $
1 $
1 $
7
7
87.5 % $
87.5 % $
(101) $
(35) $
(32) $
(66)
(188.6)% $
7
7
(3)
*
*
(9.4)%
Supplemental Unaudited Presentation of Consolidated Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted
EBITDA”) for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Adjusted EBITDA (described below), a non-GAAP financial measure, has been presented as a supplemental disclosure because it is a widely used measure
of performance and basis for valuation of companies in our industry and we believe that this non-GAAP supplemental information will be helpful in
understanding our ongoing operating results. Management has historically used Adjusted EBITDA when evaluating operating performance because we
believe that the inclusion or exclusion of certain recurring and non-recurring items is necessary to provide a full understanding of our core operating results
and as a means to evaluate period-to-period results. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest expense, (benefit) provision for income
taxes, unrealized (gain) loss on investments and marketable securities, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, impairment charges,
transaction expenses, severance expense, selling costs associated with the divestitures of properties, equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates,
(gain) loss on the sale or disposal of property and equipment, (gain) loss related to divestitures, changes in the fair value of certain derivatives and certain
non-recurring expenses such as sign-on and retention bonuses, business optimization expenses and transformation expenses, litigation awards and
settlements, losses on inventory associated with properties temporarily closed as a result of the COVID-19 public health emergency, contract exit or
termination costs, and regulatory settlements. Adjusted EBITDA also excludes the expense associated with certain of our leases as these transactions were
accounted for as financing obligations and the associated expense is included in
43
interest expense. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of performance or liquidity calculated in accordance with GAAP, is unaudited and should not be
considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss) as an indicator of our operating performance. Uses of cash flows that are not
reflected in Adjusted EBITDA include capital expenditures, interest payments, income taxes, debt principal repayments, payments under our leases with
affiliates of GLPI and VICI Properties Inc. and certain regulatory gaming assessments, which can be significant. As a result, Adjusted EBITDA should not
be considered as a measure of our liquidity. Other companies that provide EBITDA information may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do.
The definition of Adjusted EBITDA may not be the same as the definitions used in any of our debt agreements.
The following table summarizes our Adjusted EBITDA for our operating segments for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, in
addition to reconciling net (loss) income to Adjusted EBITDA in accordance with US GAAP (unaudited):
Year Ended December 31, 2020
(In millions)
Net loss attributable to Caesars
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Interest expense, net
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Other loss (income)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Impairment charges
Depreciation and amortization
Stock-based compensation expense
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Other items
(d)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Adjusted EBITDA
(a)
(In millions)
Net income (loss) attributable to Caesars
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Other loss (income)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Interest expense, net
Depreciation and amortization
Impairment charges
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Stock-based compensation expense
Other items
(d)
(c)
Adjusted EBITDA
$
$
$
$
44
Less: Divest. Add:
Disc. Ops
(e)(h)
CEI
(1,757) $
(1)
1,174
126
(176)
197
215
583
78
268
30
737 $
Pre-Acq. CEC
(f)
Total
(g)(i)
93 $
—
49
9
(12)
—
(33)
(5)
1
(6)
(2)
94 $
(1,059) $
(67)
750
(224)
(45)
—
189
559
26
71
54
254 $
(2,723)
(68)
1,973
(89)
(233)
197
371
1,137
105
333
82
1,085
Year Ended December 31, 2019
CEI
Less: Divestitures
(h)
Pre-Acq. CEC
(f)
Total
(i)
81 $
—
44
(9)
8
286
222
1
37
20
7
697 $
(51) $
—
(37)
—
—
10
(29)
—
(1)
(1)
—
(109) $
(1,195) $
(3)
(141)
587
—
1,370
1,021
468
136
88
80
2,411 $
(1,165)
(3)
(134)
578
8
1,666
1,214
469
172
107
87
2,999
(a)
(In millions)
Net income attributable to Caesars
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Other loss (income)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Interest expense, net
Depreciation and amortization
Impairment charges
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Stock-based compensation expense
Other items
(d)
(c)
Adjusted EBITDA
CEI
Less: Divestitures
(h)
Pre-Acq. CEC
(f)
Pre-Acq. Trop &
Elgin
(j)
Total
(i)
Year Ended December 31, 2018
$
$
95 $
—
40
3
—
172
157
14
17
13
5
516 $
(47) $
—
(11)
—
—
(17)
(52)
(14)
—
(1)
(1)
(143) $
303 $
1
(121)
(791)
1
1,346
1,145
78
155
79
112
2,308 $
56 $
—
19
1
1
2
64
—
4
—
32
179 $
407
1
(73)
(787)
2
1,503
1,314
78
176
91
148
2,860
____________________
(a)
Other loss (income) for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily represents gains resulting from the change in the foreign currency exchange rate associated with restricted cash held in
GBP and a derivative contract associated with our expected acquisition of William Hill, gains on William Hill UK and Flutter stock held by the Company and realized gain on conversion of
CEC’s 5% convertible notes. Partially offsetting these gains is a loss on the change in fair value of the derivative liability related to CEC’s 5% convertible notes. Other loss (income) for the
year ended December 31, 2019 primarily represents unrealized loss on the change in fair value of the derivative liability related to CEC’s 5% convertible notes.
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily represents loss on early repayment of debt in connection with the consummation of the Merger. Loss on
extinguishment of debt for the year ended December 31, 2019 is related to the pro-rated write off of deferred financing costs associated with permanent payments on the ERI Term Loan.
Transaction costs and other operating costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 primarily represent costs related to the Merger with Former Caesars, various contract or
license termination exit costs, and severance costs. Transaction costs for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily represent costs related to the Tropicana acquisition.
Other items include internal labor charges related to certain departed executives and contract labor and other miscellaneous items.
Discontinued operations include Horseshoe Hammond, Caesars Southern Indiana, Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, Caesars UK group including Emerald Resorts & Casino, and Bally’s
Atlantic City.
Pre-acquisition CEC represents results of operations for Former Caesars for the period from January 1, 2020 to July 20, 2020, the date on which the Merger was consummated, for the year
ended December 31, 2020, respectively, and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Such figures are based on unaudited internal financial statements and have not been
reviewed by the Company’s auditors and, for the 2020 periods, do not conform to GAAP.
2020 Total for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes results of operations from discontinued operations and from Former Caesars prior to July 20, 2020, the date on which the
Merger was consummated. Such presentation does not conform to GAAP or the Securities and Exchange Commission rules for pro forma presentation; however, we believe that the
additional financial information will be helpful to investors in comparing current results with results of prior periods. This is non-GAAP data and should not be considered a substitute for
data prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should be viewed in addition to the results of operations reported by the Company.
Divestitures for the year ended December 31, 2020 include results of operations for Kansas City and Vicksburg, Eldorado Shreveport, Harrah’s Reno, and Bally’s Atlantic City. Divestitures
for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 include results of operations for Presque, Nemacolin, Mountaineer, Cape Girardeau, Caruthersville, Kansas City, Vicksburg, Eldorado
Shreveport, Harrah’s Reno and Bally’s Atlantic City. Such figures are based on unaudited internal financial statements and have not been reviewed by the Company’s auditors and do not
conform to GAAP.
2020, 2019, and 2018 Totals for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 exclude results of operations from divestitures as detailed in (g) and includes results of operations from
discontinued operations and from Former Caesars prior to July 20, 2020, the date, on which the Merger was consummated. Such presentation does not conform to GAAP or the Securities
and Exchange Commission rules for pro forma presentation; however, we believe that the additional financial information will be helpful to investors in comparing current results with
results of prior periods. This is non-GAAP data and should not be considered a substitute for data prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should be viewed in addition to our reported
results of operations.
Pre-acquisition Trop & Elgin represents results of operations for Tropicana for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and for Elgin for the period beginning January 1, 2018 and
ending August 6, 2018. Such figures are based on unaudited internal financial statements and have not been reviewed by the Company’s auditors and do not conform to GAAP.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are a holding company and our only significant assets are ownership interests in our subsidiaries. Our ability to fund our obligations depends on
existing cash on hand, contracted asset sales, cash flow from our subsidiaries and our ability to raise capital. Our primary sources of liquidity and capital
resources have been existing cash on hand, cash flow from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of debt
and equity securities and proceeds from completed asset sales and sale leaseback transactions.
45
Our cash requirements fluctuate significantly depending on our decisions with respect to business acquisitions or divestitures and strategic capital
investments to maintain the quality of our properties. Our operating cash flows also significantly depend on our properties to remain open. As describe
above, all of our casino properties were temporarily closed for the period from mid-March 2020 through mid-May 2020 due to orders issued by various
government agencies and tribal bodies to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Beginning on May 15, 2020, we began reopening our properties and as of
December 31, 2020 we have resumed operations at all of our properties, with the exception of additional temporary closures of Caesars Windsor, Harrah’s
Philadelphia, and our properties in Illinois. In an effort to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 public health emergency on our business and maintain
liquidity, we furloughed approximately 90% of our employees beginning on April 11, 2020. A portion of the workforce has returned to service as the
properties have resumed with limited capacities and in compliance with operating restrictions in accordance with governmental orders, directives and
guidelines. As a result of these payroll changes combined with other cost saving measures, our operating expenses and operating cash flows were reduced
significantly.
In an effort to maintain liquidity and provide financial flexibility as the effects of COVID-19 public health emergency continued to evolve and impact
global financial markets, we borrowed $465 million under our revolving credit facility on March 16, 2020, which we repaid utilizing, in part, proceeds
from the sale of our interests in Kansas City and Vicksburg. Additionally, on June 19, 2020, we completed a public offering of 20,700,000 shares of
Company Common Stock, at an offering price of $39.00 per share, which provided $772 million of proceeds, net of fees and estimated expenses of
$35 million, for general corporate purposes.
On July 1, 2020, we completed the sale of Kansas City and Vicksburg for $230 million and used a portion of the proceeds to repay the outstanding balance
under our revolving credit facility. In addition, we closed the sale of Harrah’s Reno on September 30, 2020 which provided additional proceeds of
$8 million, net of certain closing costs.
On July 6, 2020, we issued $3.4 billion aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 (the “CEI Senior Secured Notes”), $1.8
billion aggregate principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “CEI Senior Notes”) and $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.75%
Senior Secured Notes due 2025 (the “CRC Senior Secured Notes”).
On July 20, 2020, in connection with the Merger, we consummated certain sale leaseback transactions with VICI with respect to Harrah’s New Orleans,
Harrah’s Laughlin and Harrah’s Resort Atlantic City, including the Harrah’s Atlantic City Waterfront Conference Center, for approximately $1.8 billion of
net proceeds. Additionally, we received a one-time payment from VICI of approximately $1.4 billion for amendments to the VICI Leases. Furthermore, we
entered into an incremental agreement to the existing CRC credit agreement, for an incremental term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $1.8 billion.
In connection with the consummation of the Merger, on July 20, 2020, our current and future liquidity significantly changed. A portion of the proceeds
from our newly issued debt and proceeds we received from VICI, as well as cash on hand generated from the sale of Company Common Stock, were used
(a) to fund a portion of the cash consideration of the Merger, (b) to prepay in full the loans outstanding and terminate all commitments under our existing
credit agreement, dated as of April 17, 2017, (c) to satisfy and discharge our Senior Notes, (d) to repay $975 million of the outstanding amount under the
existing CRC Revolving Credit Facility, (e) to repay in full the loans outstanding and terminate all commitments under the existing CEOC, LLC credit
agreement, dated as of October 6, 2017, (f) to pay fees and expenses related to the financing arrangements, and (g) for general corporate purposes.
Additionally, we entered into the CEI Revolving Credit Facility which provides for a five-year senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate
principal amount of $1.2 billion, that matures in 2025.
On September 18, 2020, we entered into a $400 million loan agreement with a subsidiary of VICI for a term of five years, with such loan secured by,
among other things, a first priority fee mortgage on the Caesars Forum Convention Center (the “Forum Convention Center Mortgage Loan”). The interest
rate on the Forum Convention Center Mortgage Loan is initially 7.7% per annum, which escalates annually to a maximum interest rate of 8.3% per annum.
After the second anniversary of the closing of the loan, we have the option of prepaying the loan, which may include a premium.
As of December 31, 2020, our cash on hand and revolving borrowing capacity were as follows:
(In millions)
Cash and cash equivalents
Revolver capacity
Revolver capacity committed to letters of credit
Total
December 31, 2020
1,758
2,210
(84)
3,884
$
$
On September 30, 2020, we announced that we had reached an agreement with William Hill on the terms of a recommended cash acquisition pursuant to
which we would acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital (other than shares owned by us or held in treasury) of William Hill, in an all-cash
transaction of approximately £2.9 billion, or $3.7 billion. As required
46
by UK regulations, we were required to provide a cash confirmation of funding for our potential acquisition of William Hill. In support of the confirmation
process, on September 25, 2020, we borrowed $900 million on our CEI Revolving Credit Facility. The transaction remains conditional on, among other
things, approvals from state, federal and international regulators. We entered into a foreign exchange forward contract to hedge the risk of appreciation of
the GBP denominated purchase price for the proposed William Hill acquisition. Under the agreement, we have agreed to purchase £536 million at a
contracted exchange rate. The forward term of the contract ends on March 31, 2021.
On October 1, 2020, we completed a public offering of 35,650,000 shares of Company Common Stock at an offering price of $56.00 per share. Net
proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses, were approximately $1.9 billion which we
intend to use for general corporate purposes, including to finance a portion of the proposed William Hill acquisition. As of December 31, 2020, we have
restricted cash of approximately $1.9 billion which we expect to apply to pay a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition.
On October 6, 2020, we entered into a £1.5 billion Interim Facilities Agreement with Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Pursuant to the Interim Facilities Agreement, such lenders have made available to the Company: (a) a 540-day £1.0 billion asset sale bridge facility and (b)
a 60-day £503 million cash confirmation bridge facility (collectively, the “Facility”). The Facility may be used to finance the acquisition, refinance or
otherwise discharge the indebtedness of William Hill and its subsidiaries, pay transaction fees and expenses related to the foregoing and for working capital
and general corporate purposes, among other things. The availability of the borrowings under the Facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain customary
conditions. If drawn upon, outstanding borrowings under the Facility will bear interest at a rate equal to the London interbank offered rate plus 3.50% per
annum. We entered into the Interim Facilities Agreement in connection with requirement under applicable United Kingdom law to demonstrate that we
have “funds certain” to pay the entirety of the cash purchase price for the proposed acquisition of William Hill. We do not intend to borrow under the
Interim Facilities Agreement. Instead, we intend to negotiate long-form financing documentation pursuant to which a subsidiary will incur the Debt
Financing for the acquisition.
In addition to the capital required to complete the proposed acquisition of William Hill, we expect that our primary capital requirements going forward will
relate to the operation and maintenance of our properties, taxes, servicing our outstanding indebtedness, and rent payments under the GLPI Master Lease,
the VICI Leases and other leases. We make capital expenditures and perform continuing refurbishment and maintenance at our properties to maintain our
quality standards. Our capital expenditure requirements for 2021 are expected to significantly increase as a result of the additional properties acquired in
the Merger and new development projects. We also funded $400 million to escrow as of the closing of the Merger and will utilize those funds in accordance
with a three year capital expenditure plan in the state of New Jersey, and an additional $25 million was funded in the fourth quarter of 2020 for
improvements at our racing properties within the state of Indiana. These amounts are currently included in restricted cash. We are also in the process of a
more than $47 million renovation to the resort rooms and suites of Silver Legacy Resort Casino, projected to be completed by summer 2021. In relation to
the extension of the casino operating contract and ground lease for Harrah’s New Orleans (see Note 11), we are required to make a capital investment of
$325 million by July 15, 2024.
Cash spent for capital expenditures totaled $163 million, $171 million, $147 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively,
related to our growth and maintenance capital projects. The following table summarizes our estimates for 2021 capital expenditures:
(In millions)
Atlantic City
Indiana
Total estimated capital expenditures from restricted cash
Lake Charles
New Orleans
Other growth and maintenance projects
(a)
Total estimated capital expenditures from unrestricted cash and insurance proceeds
Total estimated capital expenditures in 2021
Low
High
$
$
175 $
5
180
75
25
325
425
605 $
225
15
240
125
50
350
525
765
____________________
(a)
Includes capital expenditures that may be incurred at our Atlantic City, Indiana and Lake Charles properties for normal maintenance projects in addition to amounts described above.
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall on Lake Charles as a Category 4 storm. The hurricane severely damaged the Isle of Capri Casino Lake
Charles, as a result of which the Company has recorded an insurance receivable of $44 million, of
47
which $15 million related to fixed asset impairments and $29 million related to remediation costs and repairs that have been incurred in the year ended
December 31, 2020. The property will remain closed until construction of a new land-based casino is complete.
A significant portion of our liquidity needs are for debt service and payments associated with our leases. In addition to our newly issued debt, our debt
obligations increased as a result of outstanding debt of Former Caesars that remained outstanding following the consummation of the Merger. Our
estimated debt service (including principal and interest) is approximately $907 million for 2021. We also lease certain real property assets from third
parties, including GLPI and VICI. We estimate our lease payments to be approximately $1.1 billion for 2021.
The 5% Convertible Notes (defined below) remain outstanding following the consummation of the Merger. As a result of the Merger, the 5% Convertible
Notes are convertible into weighted average of the number of shares of Company Common Stock and the amount of cash actually received per share by
holders of common stock of Former Caesars that made elections for consideration in the Merger. The 5% Convertible Notes are convertible at any time at
the option of the holders thereof or the Company. We do not intend to exercise our option to cause the conversion of the 5% Convertible Notes prior to
maturity. As of December 31, 2020, we have paid approximately $903 million and issued approximately 10.8 million shares upon conversion of
$770 million in aggregate principal amount of the 5% Convertible Notes during 2020. At such time as the holders of the 5% Convertible Notes elect to
cause conversion, we estimate using cash of $379 million and issuing 4.5 million shares to settle the remaining outstanding 5% Convertible Notes as of
December 31, 2020.
On April 24, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive purchase agreement with Twin River and certain of its affiliates for the sale of the equity interests
of Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport Joint Venture and Columbia Properties Tahoe, LLC, the entities that hold Eldorado Shreveport and MontBleu,
respectively, for aggregate consideration of $155 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The definitive agreement provides that the
consummation of the sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. On December 23, 2020, the
Company consummated the sale of Eldorado Shreveport to Bally's Corporation for $140 million resulting in a gain of $29 million. MontBleu is expected to
close in the first half of 2021.
On September 3, 2020, the Company and VICI entered into agreement to sell Harrah’s Louisiana Downs with Rubico Acquisition Corp. for $22 million,
subject to a customary working capital adjustment, where the proceeds will be split between the Company and VICI. The sale is subject to satisfaction of
customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the first half of 2021.
We previously reached an agreement with VICI and closed the sale of Bally’s Atlantic City Hotel & Casino to Bally’s Corporation for $25 million on
November 18, 2020. The proceeds from the sale were split between the Company and VICI, and the Company received $5 million of net proceeds. In
addition, on October 9, 2020, we reached an agreement to sell the Bally’s brand to Bally’s Corporation Worldwide Holding, Inc. for $20 million, while
retaining the right to use the brand within Bally’s Las Vegas into perpetuity.
On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Evansville to GLPI and Twin River for $480 million in cash, subject to a customary
working capital adjustment. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to
close in mid-2021.
On December 1, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with CQ Holding Company, Inc. to sell the equity interests of Baton Rouge. The
definitive agreement provides that the consummation of the sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory
approvals and is expected to close in mid-2021.
On December 24, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana to the EBCI for $250 million, subject to a customary
working capital adjustment. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to
close in the third quarter of 2021.
In addition to the agreements above, we also expect to enter into additional agreements to divest of Horseshoe Hammond prior to December 31, 2021.
Further, we expect to enter into agreements to sell several other non-core properties including our international properties within our Caesars UK group,
which includes Emerald Resorts Casino. We expect these divestitures to close by mid-year 2021.
If the agreed upon selling price for future divestitures does not exceed the carrying value of the assets, we may be required to record additional impairment
charges in future periods which may be material.
We expect that our current liquidity, cash flows from operations, borrowings under committed credit facilities and proceeds from the announced asset sales,
will be sufficient to fund our operations, capital requirements and service our outstanding
48
indebtedness for the next twelve months. However, the COVID-19 public health emergency has had, and is expected to continue to have, an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations and has caused, and may continue to cause, disruption in the financial markets. While we have
undertaken efforts to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 on our business and maintain liquidity, the extent of the ongoing and future effects of the COVID-
19 public health emergency on our business, results of operations and financial condition is uncertain and may adversely impact our liquidity in the future.
Our ability to access additional capital may be adversely affected by the disruption in the financial markets caused by the COVID-19 public health
emergency, restrictions on incurring additional indebtedness contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness and the impact of the public health
emergency on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Debt and Master Lease Covenant Compliance
The CRC Credit Agreement, the CEI Revolving Credit Facility and the indentures related to the CRC Senior Notes and CEI Senior Secured Notes contain
covenants which are standard and customary for these types of agreements. These include negative covenants, which, subject to certain exceptions and
baskets, limit our ability to (among other items) incur additional indebtedness, make investments, make restricted payments, including dividends, grant
liens, sell assets and make acquisitions. The covenants in the indenture for the 5% Convertible Notes are limited as a result of amendments that became
effective in connection with the consummation of the Merger.
The CRC Revolving Credit Facility and CEI Revolving Credit Facility include a maximum first-priority net senior secured leverage ratio financial
covenant of 6.35:1, which is applicable solely to the extent that certain testing conditions are satisfied. Failure to comply with such covenants could result
in an acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness outstanding under the relevant debt documents.
The Company’s results of operations have been materially adversely affected by the impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency. As a result, the
current terms of the CRC Credit Agreement and the CEI Credit Agreement provide that the financial covenant measurement period is not effective through
September 30, 2021 so long as CRC and the Company, respectively, comply with a minimum liquidity requirement, which includes any such availability
under the applicable revolving credit facilities.
The GLPI Master Lease contains certain operating, capital expenditure and financial covenants thereunder, and our ability to comply with these covenants
was negatively impacted by the effects of the COVID-19 public health emergency on our results of operations. On June 15, 2020, we entered into an
amendment to the GLPI Master Lease which provides certain relief under these covenants in the event of facility closures due to public health emergencies,
governmental restrictions and certain other instances of unavoidable delay. On July 17, 2020, the amendment to the GLPI Master Lease became effective as
the Company obtained all necessary approvals and the applicable waiting period expired. Furthermore, the Company obtained waivers from VICI with
relation to annual capital expenditure requirements for 2020.
As of December 31, 2020, we were in compliance with all of the applicable financial covenants under the CEI Credit Agreement, CEI Senior Secured
Notes, CRC Credit Agreement, CEI Senior Notes, CRC Senior Secured Notes, 5% Convertible Notes, the GLPI Leases and VICI Leases.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 8, 2018, we issued a press release announcing that our Board has authorized a $150 million common stock repurchase program (the “Share
Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which we may, from time to time, repurchase shares of common stock on the open market (either with or without a
10b5-1 plan) or through privately negotiated transactions. The Share Repurchase Program has no time limit and may be suspended or discontinued at any
time without notice. There is no minimum number of shares of common stock that we are required to repurchase under the Share Repurchase Program.
As of December 31, 2020, we have acquired 223,823 shares of common stock under the program at an aggregate value of $9 million and an average of
$40.80 per share. No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.
49
Debt Obligations and Leases
New Debt Transactions
We were party to a credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto dated as of April 17, 2017 (as
amended, the “ERI Credit Facility”), consisting of a $1.5 billion term loan facility and a $500 million revolving credit facility.
In an effort to maintain liquidity and provide financial flexibility as the effects of COVID-19 continued to evolve and impact global financial markets, we
borrowed $465 million under the ERI Credit Facility on March 16, 2020, which we repaid in July 2020 utilizing, in part, proceeds from the sale of our
interests in Kansas City and Vicksburg.
On July 6, 2020, Colt Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Escrow Issuer”) issued $3.4 billion aggregate principal amount of
6.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2025, $1.8 billion aggregate principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes due 2027 and $1.0 billion aggregate principal
amount of 5.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2025.
On July 20, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, the Company entered into a new credit agreement which provides a five-year senior
secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.2 billion. In addition, Caesars Resort Collection, LLC, which became a wholly-
owned subsidiary of the Company as a result of the Merger (“CRC”), entered into incremental agreements to the CRC Credit Agreement (described below)
for an aggregate principal amount of $1.8 billion.
A portion of the proceeds from these arrangements was used to prepay in full the loans outstanding and terminate all commitments under the ERI Credit
Facility, and to satisfy and discharge the Company’s 6% Senior Notes due 2025, 6% Senior Notes due 2026, and the 7% Senior Notes due 2023.
The 6% Senior Notes due 2025 were redeemed at a redemption price of 104.5%, the 7% Senior Notes due 2023 were redeemed at a redemption price of
103.5%, and $210 million aggregate principal amount of the 6% Senior Notes due 2026 was redeemed at a redemption price of 106% with the remaining
balance redeemed at a redemption price of 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus the Applicable Premium, as defined in the indenture for the
6% Senior Notes due 2026. The redemption of these senior notes resulted in a loss on extinguishment of $132 million during the year ended December 31,
2020, which is recorded within Loss on extinguishment of debt on the Statement of Operations.
CEI Senior Secured Notes due 2025
On July 6, 2020, Escrow Issuer issued $3.4 billion in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% CEI Senior Secured Notes due 2025 pursuant to an indenture
dated July 6, 2020 (the “CEI Senior Secured Notes”), by and among the Escrow Issuer, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as collateral agent. In connection with the consummation of the Merger, we assumed the rights and obligations under the CEI Senior Secured
Notes and the indenture governing the CEI Senior Secured Notes on July 20, 2020. The CEI Senior Secured Notes will mature on July 1, 2025 with interest
payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2021.
CEI Senior Notes due 2027
On July 6, 2020, Escrow Issuer issued $1.8 billion in aggregate principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes due 2027 pursuant to an indenture, dated July 6,
2020 (the “CEI Senior Notes”), by and between the Escrow Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. We assumed the rights and obligations
under the CEI Senior Notes and the indenture governing the CEI Senior Notes on July 20, 2020. The CEI Secured Notes will mature on July 1, 2027 with
interest payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2021.
CRC Senior Secured Notes due 2025
On July 6, 2020, Escrow Issuer issued $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2025 pursuant to an indenture, dated July 6,
2020 (the “CRC Senior Secured Notes”), by and among the Escrow Issuer, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman
Islands Branch, as collateral agent. CRC assumed the rights and obligations under the CRC Senior Secured Notes and the indenture governing the CRC
Senior Secured Notes on July 20, 2020. The CRC Senior Secured Notes will mature on July 1, 2025 with interest payable semi-annually in cash in arrears
on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2021.
50
CEI Revolving Credit Facility
On July 20, 2020, we entered into a new credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, U.S. Bank National Association, as
collateral agent, and certain banks and other financial institutions and lenders party thereto, as well as an incremental amendment thereto, which provide for
a five-year CEI Revolving Credit Facility for an aggregate principal amount of $1.2 billion. The CEI Revolving Credit Facility matures in 2025 and
includes a letter of credit sub-facility of $250 million.
The interest rate per annum applicable under the CEI Revolving Credit Facility, at the Company’s option is either (a) LIBOR adjusted for certain additional
costs, subject to a floor of 0% or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the prime rate as
determined by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and (iii) the one-month adjusted LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, in each case plus an applicable margin. Such
applicable margin shall be 3.25% per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan and 2.25% per annum in the case of any base rate loan, subject to three 0.25%
step-downs based on the Company’s total leverage ratio.
Additionally, we are required to pay a commitment fee in respect of any unused commitments under CEI Revolving Credit Facility in the amount of 0.50%
of principal amount of the commitments of all lenders, subject to a step-down to 0.375% based upon the Company’s total leverage ratio. We are also
required to pay customary agency fees as well as letter of credit participation fees computed at a rate per annum equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR
borrowings on the dollar equivalent of the daily stated amount of outstanding letters of credit, plus such letter of credit issuer’s customary documentary and
processing fees and charges and a fronting fee in an amount equal to 0.125% of the daily stated amount of such letter of credit.
We had $1.2 billion of available borrowing capacity, after consideration of $19 million in outstanding letters of credit under CEI Revolving Credit Facility,
as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding under the CEI Revolving Credit Facility.
Convention Center Mortgage Loan
On September 18, 2020, we entered into a loan agreement with VICI to borrow a five-year, $400 million Forum Convention Center mortgage loan (the
“Mortgage Loan”). The Mortgage Loan bears interest at a rate of, initially, 7.7% per annum, which escalates annually to a maximum interest rate of 8.3%
per annum.
Lumière Loan
The Company borrowed $246 million from GLPI to fund the purchase price of the real estate underlying Lumière, which was scheduled to mature on
October 1, 2020. On June 24, 2020, the Company received approval from Missouri Gaming Commission to sell the real estate underlying Lumière to GLPI
and leaseback the property under a long-term financing obligation. As of December 31, 2020, the Lumière loan has been satisfied in full and the real estate
has been refinanced under a financing obligation. See Note 10.
Assumed Debt Activity
Former Caesars and its subsidiaries incurred the following indebtedness that remained outstanding following the consummation of the Merger.
CRC Term Loans and CRC Revolving Credit Facility
In connection with the Merger, we assumed the CRC senior secured credit facility (the “CRC Senior Secured Credit Facilities”), which included a
$1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility (the “CRC Revolving Credit Facility”) and an initial $4.7 billion seven-year first lien term loan (the “CRC
Term Loan”), which was increased by $1.8 billion pursuant to an incremental agreement executed in connection with the Merger (the “CRC Incremental
Term Loan”).
The CRC Revolving Credit Facility matures in 2022 and includes a letter of credit sub-facility. The CRC Term Loan matures in 2024. The CRC
Incremental Term Loan matures in 2025. Each of the CRC Term Loan and the CRC Incremental Term Loan require scheduled quarterly principal payments
in amounts equal to 0.25% of the original aggregate principal amount, with the balance due at maturity. The credit agreement for the CRC Revolving Credit
Facility also includes customary voluntary and mandatory prepayment provisions, subject to certain exceptions. As of December 31, 2020, approximately
$65 million was committed to outstanding letters of credit. As of December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding under the CRC Revolving
Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the CRC Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to either (a) LIBOR adjusted for certain additional costs, subject to a floor of 0%
or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%,
51
(ii) the prime rate as determined by Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent under the CRC Credit Agreement and (iii) the one-
month adjusted LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, in each case plus an applicable margin. Such applicable margin shall be (a) with respect to the CRC Term Loan,
2.75% per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan or 1.75% per annum in the case of any base rate loan, (b) with respect to the CRC Incremental Term Loan,
4.50% per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan or 3.50% in the case of any base rate loan and (c) in the case of the CRC Revolving Credit Facility, 2.25%
per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan and 1.25% per annum in the case of any base rate loan, subject in the case of the CRC Revolving Credit Facility
to two 0.125% step-downs based on CRC’s senior secured leverage ratio, the ratio of first lien senior secured net debt to adjusted earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization. The CRC Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a financial covenant discussed below.
In addition, CRC is required to pay a commitment fee in respect of any commitments under the CRC Revolving Credit Facility in the amount of 0.50% of
the principal amount of the commitments, subject to step-downs to 0.375% and 0.25% based upon CRC’s senior secured leverage ratio. CRC is also
required to pay customary agency fees as well as letter of credit participation fees computed at a rate per annum equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR
borrowings on the dollar equivalent of the daily stated amount of outstanding letters of credit, plus such letter of credit issuer’s customary documentary and
processing fees and charges and a fronting fee in an amount equal to 0.125% of the daily stated amount of such letter of credit.
CRC Notes
On October 16, 2017, CRC issued $1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior notes due 2025 (the “CRC Notes”).
Former Caesars 5% Convertible Notes
On October 6, 2017, Former Caesars issued $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.00% convertible senior notes maturing in 2024 (the “5%
Convertible Notes”).
The 5% Convertible Notes are convertible into weighted average of the number of shares of Company Common Stock and amount of cash actually
received per share by holders of common stock of Former Caesars that made elections for consideration in the Merger. As of December 31, 2020, we have
paid approximately $903 million and issued approximately 10.8 million shares upon conversion of $770 million of the 5% Convertible Notes during 2020.
The Company has determined that the 5% Convertible Notes contain derivative features that require bifurcation. The Company separately accounts for the
liability component and equity conversion option of the 5% Convertible Notes. The portion of the overall fair value allocated to the liability was calculated
by using a market-based approach without the conversion features included. The difference between the overall instrument value and the value of the
liability component was assumed to be the value of the equity conversion option component. The value of the liability is determined based on a discounted
cash flow of the debt instrument. See Note 8 for more information on the 5% Convertible Notes’ fair value measurements.
Net amortization of the debt issuance costs and the discount and/or premium associated with the Company’s indebtedness totaled $80 million, $8 million
and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization of debt issuance costs is computed using the effective
interest method and is included in interest expense.
VICI Leases
Upon consummation of the Merger, we assumed obligations of certain real property assets leased from VICI by Former Caesars under the following
agreements: (i) for a portfolio of properties at various locations throughout the United States (the “Non-CPLV lease”), (ii) for Caesars Palace Las Vegas
(the “CPLV lease”), (iii) for Harrah’s Joliet Hotel & Casino (the “Joliet Lease”) and (iv) for Harrah’s Las Vegas (the “HLV Lease”). These lease agreements
provided for annual fixed rent (subject to escalation) of $773 million during an initial period, then rent consisting of both base rent and variable rent
elements. The lease agreements had a 15-year initial term and four five-year renewal options. The lease agreements included escalation provisions
beginning in year two of the initial term and continuing through the renewal terms. The lease agreements also included provisions for variable rent
payments calculated, in part, based on increases or decreases of net revenue of the underlying lease properties, commencing in year eight of the initial term
and continuing through the renewal terms.
Former Caesars entered into a Golf Course Use Agreement with VICI, which has a 35-year term (inclusive of all renewal periods), pursuant to which such
affiliates of the Company agreed to pay (i) an annual payment of $10 million, subject to escalation, (ii) an annual use fee of $3 million, subject to escalation
beginning in the second year, and (iii) certain per-round fees, all as more particularly set forth in the Golf Course Use Agreement.
In connection with the closing of the Merger on July 20, 2020, we consummated a series of transactions with VICI and certain of its affiliates in accordance
with the MTA entered on June 24, 2019 and certain purchase and sales agreement entered on
52
September 26, 2019. We consummated sale leaseback transactions related to Harrah’s New Orleans, Harrah’s Laughlin and Harrah’s Resort Atlantic City,
including the Harrah’s Atlantic City Waterfront Conference Center, for approximately $1.8 billion of net proceeds. The CPLV Lease with VICI was
amended, among other things, (i) add Harrah’s Las Vegas (“HLV”) to the leased premises thereunder (and in connection therewith HLV Lease was
terminated), (ii) add (subject to certain adjustments) the rent payable with respect to HLV under such terminated stand-alone lease to such lease and further
increase the annual rent payable with respect to HLV by approximately $15 million, (iii) increase the annual rent with respect to CPLV by approximately
$84 million and (iv) extend the term of such lease so that following the amendment of such lease there will be 15 years remaining until the expiration of the
initial term. In addition, Harrah’s New Orleans, Harrah’s Laughlin, and Harrah’s Resort Atlantic City, including the Harrah’s Atlantic City Waterfront
Conference Center, were added to the Non-CPLV lease (as amended, the “Regional Lease”) and such lease was further amended to increase the annual rent
thereunder by $154 million in the aggregate related to such added properties and extend the term of such lease so that following the amendment of such
lease there will be 15 years remaining until the expiration of the initial term. Furthermore, the Joliet Lease, as well as the term of the Golf Course Use
Agreement, were extended such that there will be 15 years remaining until the expiration of the initial term.
On December 24, 2020, the Company entered into agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (“EBCI”) for
$250 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. Caesar’s annual payments to VICI Properties under the Regional Lease will decline by
$33 million upon closing of the transaction.
Our VICI lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and totaled $11.0 billion as of December 31, 2020. Furthermore, we obtained waivers from VICI
with relation to annual capital expenditure requirements for 2020. See Note 10 to our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for additional
information about our VICI Lease and related matters.
GLPI Leases
Our GLPI Master Lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and totaled $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, our GLPI Master Lease
contains certain operating, capital expenditure and financial covenants thereunder, and our ability to maintain compliance with these covenants was also
negatively impacted. On June 15, 2020, we entered into an amendment to the GLPI Master Lease which, among other things, provides certain relief under
these covenants in the event of facility closures due to pandemics, governmental restrictions and certain other instances of unavoidable delay. As of July 17,
2020, the amendment to the GLPI Master Lease became effective as we obtained all necessary approvals and the applicable waiting period expired. See
Note 10 to our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for additional information about our GLPI Master Lease and related matters.
Other Liquidity Matters
We are faced with certain contingencies involving litigation and environmental remediation and compliance. These commitments and contingencies are
discussed in greater detail in “Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings” and Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements, both of which are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, new competition may have a material adverse effect on our revenues and could have a similar
adverse effect on our liquidity. See “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business” which is included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with GAAP. In preparing our financial statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of
the amounts and disclosures included in the financial statements, giving regard to materiality. When more than one accounting principle, or method of its
application, is generally accepted, we select the principle or method that we consider to be the most appropriate under specific circumstances. Application
of these accounting principles requires us to make estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties. Certain of our accounting policies,
including those in connection with business combinations, certain fair value measurements, income taxes, long-lived assets, goodwill and indefinite lived
intangible assets, allowance for doubtful accounts related to certain gaming receivables, self-insurance reserves, and litigation, claims and assessments
require that we apply significant judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates.
We consider accounting estimates to be critical accounting policies when:
•
•
the estimates involve matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made; and
different estimates or changes to estimates could have a material impact on the reported financial position, changes in financial position, or results
of operations.
53
By their nature, these judgments and estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our judgments and estimates are based on our historical
experience, terms of existing contracts, observance of trends in the industry, information gathered from customer behavior, and information available from
other outside sources, as appropriate. Due to the inherent uncertainty involving judgments and estimates, actual results may differ from those estimates.
Our most critical accounting estimates and assumptions are in the following areas:
Business Combinations
We applied the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” in the accounting for our acquisitions of
Former Caesars, Tropicana, Elgin and our previous acquisitions. It required us to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their
acquisition date fair values, which were determined using market, income, and cost approaches, or a combination. Goodwill as of the respective acquisition
dates was measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed. Goodwill is generally the result of expected synergies of the combined company or an assembled workforce.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired primarily include trademarks, Caesars Rewards acquired in the Merger, customer relationships and gaming
rights. The fair value for these intangible assets was determined using either the relief from royalty method and excess earnings method under the income
approach or a replacement cost market approach.
Trademarks and Caesars Rewards were valued using the relief from royalty method, which presumes that without ownership of such trademarks or loyalty
program, we would have to make a stream of payments to a brand or franchise owner in return for the right to use their name or program. By virtue of this
asset, we avoid any such payments and record the related intangible value of the Company’s ownership of the brand name or program.
Customer relationships were valued using the cost approach and the incremental cash flow method under the income approach. The incremental cash flow
method compares the prospective cash flows with and without the customer relationships in place to estimate the fair value of the customer relationships,
with the fair value assumed to be equal to the discounted cash flows of the business that would be lost if the customer relationships were not in place and
needed to be replaced.
Gaming rights include our gaming licenses in various jurisdictions and may have indefinite lives or an estimated useful life. The fair value of the gaming
rights was determined using the excess earnings or replacement cost methodology, based on whether the license resides in gaming jurisdictions where
competition is limited to a specified number of licensed gaming operators. The excess earnings methodology is an income approach methodology that
estimates the projected cash flows of the business attributable to the gaming license intangible asset, which is net of charges for the use of other identifiable
assets of the business including working capital, fixed assets and other intangible assets. The replacement cost of the gaming license was used as an
indicator of fair value.
Trade receivables and payables and other current and noncurrent assets and liabilities were valued at the existing carrying values as they represented the
estimated fair value of those items at the acquisition date. Assets and liabilities held for sale are recorded at fair value, less costs to sell, based on the
agreements reached as of the acquisition date, or an income approach.
The fair value of the financing obligations were calculated as the net present value of both the fixed base rent payments and the forecasted variable
payments plus the expected residual value of the land and building returned at the end of the expected usage period.
The fair value of land was determined using the sales comparable approach. The market data is then adjusted for any significant differences, to the extent
known, between the identified comparable sites and the site being valued. The value of building and site improvements was estimated via the income
approach. Other personal property assets such as furniture, gaming and computer equipment, fixtures, computer software, and restaurant equipment were
valued using the cost approach which is based on replacement or reproduction costs of the asset. The cost approach is an estimation of fair value developed
by computing the current cost of replacing a property and subtracting any depreciation resulting from one or more of the following factors: physical
deterioration, functional obsolescence, and/or economic obsolescence.
Cash flow estimates are significant to many valuations described above and may include forecasts with assumptions regarding factors such as recent and
budgeted operating performance, future growth rates, and the determination of appropriate discount rates to estimate fair value. These inputs involve
significant assumptions including the future effects of COVID-19 as well as the realization of synergies anticipated from a business combination, which
may not be realized as projected. Certain assumptions, such as the effects of COVID-19, may be beyond our control.
54
Fair Value Measurements
The 5% Convertible Notes contain derivative features that require bifurcation. We estimate the fair value of the 5% Convertible Notes using a market-based
approach that incorporates the value of both straight debt and conversion features of the notes. The valuation model incorporates actively traded prices of
the 5% Convertible Notes as of the reporting date, the value of CEI’s equity into which these notes could convert, and assumptions regarding the
incremental cost of borrowing for CEI. The fair value of the 5% Convertible Notes derivative liability is subject to interest rate and market price risk due to
the conversion features of the notes and other factors. Generally, as the fair value of fixed interest rate debt increases (due to a decrease in interest rates) the
derivative liability decreases and as the fair value of fixed interest rate debt decreases (due to an increase in interest rates) the derivative liability increases.
The fair value of the 5% Convertible Notes derivative liability may also increase as the market price of our stock rises or due to increased volatility in our
stock price which will result in a loss recognized in our Statement of Operations, and decrease as the market price of our stock falls or due to decreased
volatility in our stock price which will result in income recognized in our Statement of Operations. On October 6, 2017, Former Caesars issued $1.1 billion
aggregate principal amount of 5% Convertible Notes. As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of the derivative associated with the 5% Convertible Notes
was $326 million when the price per share of our common stock was $74.27. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized a loss of
$111 million associated to the changes in fair value of the derivative as a result of fluctuations in the share price of our common stock.
We use interest rate swaps, which are derivative instruments classified as hedging transactions, to limit our exposure to interest rate risk. Derivative
instruments are recognized in the financial statements at fair value. The estimated fair values of our derivative instruments are based on market prices
obtained from dealer quotes. Such quotes represent the estimated amounts we would receive or pay to terminate the contracts. Our derivative instruments
contain a credit risk that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreements. We minimize that risk by evaluating the creditworthiness of
our counterparties, which are limited to major banks and financial institutions. The fair values of our derivative instruments are adjusted for the credit
rating of the counterparty, if the derivative is an asset, or adjusted for the credit rating of the Company, if the derivative is a liability.
See Note 8 for more details regarding fair value measurements and Item 7A for quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.
Income Taxes
We and our subsidiaries file income tax returns with federal, state and foreign jurisdictions. Our income tax returns are subject to examination by the
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax authorities. Positions taken in tax returns are sometimes subject to uncertainty in the tax laws and may not
ultimately be accepted by the IRS or other tax authorities. See Note 17 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the status
and impact of examinations by tax authorities.
We record income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and
as attributable to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on
the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred
tax assets is assessed periodically based on the “more likely than not” realization threshold. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature,
frequency, and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, our experience
with operating loss and tax credit carryforwards not expiring unused, and tax planning alternatives.
When there is a recent history of operating losses and negative normalized earnings and a return to operating profitability has not yet been demonstrated,
we cannot rely on projections of future taxable earnings for purposes of assessing recoverability of our deferred tax assets. In such cases, we use systematic
and logical methods to estimate when deferred tax liabilities will reverse and generate taxable income and when deferred tax assets will reverse and
generate tax deductions. Our most significant deferred tax asset relates to the failed sale-leaseback obligation with VICI and GLPI (see Note 10). The
reversal of this deferred tax asset requires judgment and estimates and has a material impact on the determination of the amount of valuation allowance
required.
Under the applicable accounting standards, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. The accounting standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim
periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions.
55
Long-Lived Assets
We have significant capital invested in our long-lived assets, and judgments are made in determining the estimated useful lives of assets, salvage values to
be assigned to assets, and if or when an asset has been impaired. The accuracy of these estimates affects the amount of depreciation and amortization
expense recognized in our financial results and whether we have a gain or loss on the disposal of an asset. We assign lives to our assets based on our
standard policy, which is established by management as representative of the useful life of each category of asset. We review the carrying value of our long-
lived assets whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows
expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating
results, trends and prospects, planned construction and renovation projects, as well as the effect of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic,
legal, and regulatory factors. In estimating expected future cash flows for determining whether an asset is impaired, assets are grouped at the lowest level of
identifiable cash flows, which, for most of our assets, is the individual property. See Note 6 for additional information.
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
Assessing goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment is a process that requires significant judgment and involves detailed qualitative
and quantitative business-specific analysis and many individual assumptions which fluctuate between assessments.
We determine the estimated fair value of each reporting unit based on a combination of EBITDA, valuation multiples, and estimated future cash flows
discounted at rates commensurate with the capital structure and cost of capital of comparable market participants, giving appropriate consideration to the
prevailing borrowing rates within the casino industry in general. We also evaluate the aggregate fair value of all of our reporting units and other non-
operating assets in comparison to our aggregate debt and equity market capitalization at the test date. EBITDA multiples and discounted cash flows are
common measures used to value businesses in our industry.
We determine the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets using either the relief from royalty method or the excess earnings method under the
income approach or replacement cost market approach. The determination of fair value of our reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets requires
management to make significant assumptions and estimates around the forecasts as well as the selection of discount rates and valuation multiples. Changes
in these estimates could have a significant impact on the fair value of our reporting units and intangible assets and the amount of goodwill or indefinite-
lived intangible asset impairments, if any.
Forecasts and the determination of appropriate discount rates and valuation multiples used to determine the fair value of our reporting units and indefinite-
lived intangible assets involves significant assumptions and estimates. Assumptions include those used assess future effects of COVID-19 as well as the
realization of synergies anticipated from the Merger which may not be realized at the projected rate.
As a result of declines in recent performance and the expected impact on future cash flows as a result of COVID-19, we recognized impairment charges in
our Regional segment related to goodwill and trade names totaling $100 million and $16 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2020.
As a result of the agreement to sell Baton Rouge, an impairment charge totaling $50 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to
the carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds. The impairment charges resulted in a reduction to the carrying amounts of the right-of-use
assets, property and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles totaling $1 million, $47 million and $2 million, respectively, recorded in the Regional
segment.
As a result of the agreement to sell MontBleu, an impairment charge totaling $45 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the
carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds. The impairment charges resulted in a reduction to the carrying amounts of the right-of-use
assets, property and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles totaling $18 million, $23 million and $4 million, respectively, recorded in the Regional
segment.
We acquired Former Caesars on July, 20, 2020 and allocated the total purchase consideration transferred to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their respective fair values, including goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, and therefore, the fair value of the Former Caesars
reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets do not significantly exceed their respective carrying values. As of October 1, 2020, two other reporting
units in the Regional Segment with goodwill totaling $208 million had fair values that did not significantly exceed their respective carrying values. To the
extent gaming volumes deteriorate in the near future, discount rates increase significantly, or we do not meet our projected performance, we may recognize
further impairments, and such impairments could be material. See Note 7 for additional information.
56
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Gaming
We reserve an estimated amount for gaming receivables that may not be collected to reduce the Company’s receivables to their net carrying amount.
Methodologies for estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts range from specific reserves to various percentages applied to aged receivables.
Historical collection rates are considered, as are customer relationships, in determining specific reserves. As with many estimates, management must make
judgments about potential actions by third parties in establishing and evaluating our reserves for allowance for doubtful accounts. As of December 31,
2020, a 5% increase or decrease to the allowance determined based on a percentage of aged receivables would change the reserve by approximately
$14 million.
Self-Insurance Reserves
We are self-insured for various levels of general liability, employee medical insurance coverage and workers’ compensation coverage. Insurance claims and
reserves include accruals of estimated settlements for known claims, as well as accruals of estimates for claims incurred but not yet reported. We utilize
independent consultants to assist management in its determination of estimated insurance liabilities. While the total cost of claims incurred depends on
future developments, in managements’ opinion, recorded reserves are adequate to cover future claims payments. Self-insurance reserves for employee
medical claims and workers’ compensations are included in accrued payroll and related on the consolidated balance sheets. Self-insurance reserves for
general liability claims are included in accrued other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Due to the novel nature of the disruption resulting from the COVID-19 public health emergency, actuarial data is limited for determining its effect. The
assumptions utilized by our actuaries are subject to significant uncertainty and if outcomes differ from these assumptions or events develop or progress in a
negative manner, the Company could experience a material adverse effect and additional liabilities may be recorded in the future. Alternatively, as a result
of the current work stoppages, a reduction of claims in future periods could be beneficial to our financial condition and results of operations.
Litigation, Claims and Assessments
We utilize estimates for litigation, claims and assessments. These estimates are based on our knowledge and experience regarding current and past events,
as well as assumptions about future events. If our assessment of such a matter should change, we may have to change the estimates, which may have an
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see
Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and
commodity prices. We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from variable rate long-term debt arrangements. Our exposure to foreign exchange
risk is primarily attributable to funds held in operating and escrow accounts which are denominated in British Pounds (GBP).
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2020, the face value of our long-term debt was $15.0 billion, including variable-rate long-term borrowings of $6.4 billion. No amounts
were outstanding under our revolving credit facilities.
As a result of the Merger, we assumed Former Caesars’ interest rate swaps, of which seven interest rate swap agreements are currently in place to fix the
interest rate on $2.3 billion of variable rate debt. As a result, net of these interest rate swaps, $4.1 billion of debt remains subject to variable interest rates, as
of December 31, 2020, for the term of the agreements. See Note 12 for additional information. The difference to be paid or received under the terms of the
interest rate swap agreements is accrued as interest rates change and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense as settlements occur. Changes in the
variable interest rates to be received pursuant to the terms of the interest rate swap agreements will have a corresponding effect on future cash flows.
We do not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
57
The table below provides information as of December 31, 2020 about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates including the
cash flows associated with amortization, the notional amounts of interest rate derivative instruments, and related weighted average interest rates. Principal
amounts are used to calculate the payments to be exchanged under the related agreements and weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward
rates in the yield curve as of December 31, 2020 and should not be considered a predictor of actual future interest rates.
(Dollars in millions)
Liabilities
Long-term debt
Fixed rate
Average interest rate
Variable rate
Average interest rate
Interest Rate Derivatives
Interest rate swaps
(a)
Variable to fixed
Average pay rate
Average receive rate
____________________
(a)
2021
2022
Expected Maturity Date
2023
2024
2025
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
2
6.4 %
65
3.6 %
$
$
2
6.4 %
65
3.6 %
$
1,050
$
1,250
$
2.7 %
1.3 %
2.7 %
1.8 %
$
$
$
2
6.4 %
65
3.8 %
—
— %
— %
$
$
$
317
6.5 %
4,436
6.4 %
—
— %
— %
$
$
$
6,502
8.4 %
1,724
6.6 %
—
— %
— %
$
$
$
1,843
8.1 %
—
— %
—
— %
— %
8,668
7.1 %
6,355
4.1 %
$
$
9,179
6,287
2,300
2.7 %
1.5 %
These amounts represent the interest rate swap notional amounts that mature at the end of each respective year. See Note 12 for additional information.
As of December 31, 2020, borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities were variable-rate borrowings. Assuming a 100 basis-point increase in
LIBOR, our annual interest cost would change by $41 million based on gross amounts outstanding at December 31, 2020.
LIBOR is expected to be discontinued after 2021. The interest rate per annum applicable to loans under our credit facilities are, at our option, either LIBOR
plus a margin or a base rate plus a margin. The credit facilities permit the administrative agent to select, in its reasonable discretion, an alternative base rate
in the event that LIBOR is discontinued, but there can be no assurances as to what alternative base rates may be and whether such base rate will be more or
less favorable than LIBOR and any other unforeseen impacts of the potential discontinuation of LIBOR. We intend to continue monitoring the
developments with respect to the potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 and work with our lenders to ensure any transition away from LIBOR will
have minimal impact on our financial condition, but can provide no assurances regarding the impact of the discontinuation of LIBOR.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risks
The Company entered into a foreign exchange forward contract to hedge the risk of appreciation of the GBP denominated purchase price related to William
Hill. On October 9, 2020, the Company entered into a foreign exchange forward contract to purchase £536 million at a contracted exchange rate. As of
December 31, 2020, the forward contract was valued at $40 million and was recorded in Other long-term assets. A corresponding unrealized gain of
$40 million related to the change in fair value was recorded in the Other (loss) income in the Statement of Operations.
As of December 31, 2020, we held approximately $2.5 billion of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash denominated in GBP. Although these funds are
subject to changes in foreign exchange rates, such risk is expected to be mitigated as we anticipate using these funds for the purchase price of William Hill,
which is also denominated in GBP.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Our consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements, including the reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP and Ernst & Young
LLP thereon, are included at pages 71 through 132 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
that we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded,
58
processed, summarized, evaluated and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under the Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K Annual Report and as required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b)
promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K Annual Report are effective to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported within the time periods
specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Exchange Act) for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the
Company’s management regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes.
Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated and assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K Annual Report based upon the framework set forth in the Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation and
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
The Company completed its acquisition of Caesars Entertainment Corporation and changed its name to Caesars Entertainment, Inc. on July 20, 2020.
Accordingly, the acquired assets and liabilities of Caesars Entertainment Corporation are included in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2020 and the results of its operations and cash flows are reported in our consolidated statement of operations and cash flows for the year ended December
31, 2020 from the date of acquisition. We are currently in the process of integrating policies, processes, information technology systems and other
components of internal controls over financial reporting of the combined business. Management will continue to evaluate our internal control over financial
reporting as we complete our integration. In accordance with SEC staff guidance permitting a company to exclude an acquired business from
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the year in which the acquisition is completed, management
has excluded Caesars Entertainment Corporation from its internal control assessment. Caesars Entertainment Corporation represents 34% of Caesars
Entertainment, Inc.’s consolidated assets as of December 31, 2020, and 59% of Caesars Entertainment, Inc’s net revenue for the year ended December 31,
2020.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2020, as stated in its report which follows below.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as noted below, during the quarter ended December 31, 2020, there were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
On July 20, 2020, we completed the acquisition of Caesars Entertainment Corporation. See Part IV, Item 15, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
Note 3. Acquisitions, Purchase Price Accounting and Pro forma Information, for a discussion of the acquisition and related financial data. The Company is
in the process of integrating Caesars Entertainment Corporation into our internal controls over financial reporting. As a result of these integration activities,
certain controls will be evaluated and may be changed. Excluding the acquisition, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
59
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Caesars Entertainment, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020,
based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, of the Company and our report dated February 26, 2021, expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements.
As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control
over financial reporting at Caesars Entertainment Corporation, which was acquired on July 20, 2020, and whose financial statements constitute 34% of
total assets and 59% of revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. Accordingly, our audit
did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Caesars Entertainment Corporation.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 26, 2021
60
Item 9B. Other Information.
Not applicable.
61
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
PART III
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders (our
“Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than April 30, 2021, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities
Act.
We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct applicable to all directors and employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The code of business conduct and ethics is posted on our website, http://www.caesars.com/corporate (accessible
through the “Governance” caption of the Investors page) and a printed copy will be delivered on request by writing to the Corporate Secretary at Caesars
Entertainment, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 100 West Liberty Street, 12th Floor, Reno, NV 89501. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement
regarding certain amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of its code of business conduct and ethics by posting such information on our website.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission no later than April 30, 2021, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Act.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission no later than April 30, 2021, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Act.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission no later than April 30, 2021, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Act.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission no later than April 30, 2021, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Act.
62
PART IV
Item 15. Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)(i) Financial Statements
Included in Part II (Item 8) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a)(ii) Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant Parent Company Only as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2020,
2019, and 2018
We have omitted schedules other than the ones listed above because they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial
statements or notes to the financial statements.
(a)(iii) Exhibits
63
Exhibit
Number
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5**
10.6**
Description of Exhibit
Method of Filing
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 24, 2019, by and among Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Eldorado
Resorts, Inc. and Colt Merger Sub, Inc.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on June 25, 2019.
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 15, 2019, by and among Caesars
Entertainment Corporation, Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and Colt Merger Sub, Inc.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on August 16, 2019.
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Eldorado Resorts, Inc., Delta Merger Sub, Inc., GLP Capital, L.P. and
Tropicana Entertainment Inc., dated as of April 15, 2018.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on April 16, 2018.
Certificate of Incorporation of Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Bylaws of Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Description of Capital Stock
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Filed herewith.
Indenture (6.25% CEI Senior Secured Notes due 2025) dated as of July 6, 2020, by and between Colt Merger Sub,
Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 7, 2020.
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2020, to Indenture (6.25% CEI Senior Secured Notes due 2025), dated as
of July 6, 2020, by and among Colt Merger Sub, Inc., Eldorado Resorts, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto
and U.S. Bank National Association.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Indenture (8.125% CEI Senior Notes due 2027) dated as of July 6, 2020, by and between Colt Merger Sub, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 7, 2020.
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2020, to Indenture (8.125% CEI Senior Notes due 2027), dated as of July
6, 2020, by and among Colt Merger Sub, Inc., Eldorado Resorts, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and U.S.
Bank National Association.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Indenture (5.75% CRC Secured Notes due 2025) dated as of July 6, 2020, by and between Colt Merger Sub, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 7, 2020.
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2020, to Indenture (5.75% CRC Secured Notes due 2025), dated as of July
6, 2020, by and among Colt Merger Sub, Inc., CRC Finco, Inc., Caesars Resort Collection, LLC, the subsidiary
guarantors party thereto, U.S. Bank National Association and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Indenture (5.00% CEC Convertible Notes due 2024), dated as of October 6, 2017, between Caesars Entertainment
Corporation and Delaware Trust Company, as trustee.
First Supplemental Indenture (5.00% CEC Convertible Notes due 2024), dated November 27, 2019 between Caesars
Entertainment Corporation and Delaware Trust Company, as trustee.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
October 13, 2017.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
November 29, 2019.
Second Supplemental Indenture (5.00% CEC Convertible Notes due 2024), dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among
Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and Delaware Trust Company.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Indenture (5.25% CRC Notes due 2025), dated October 16, 2017, by and among CRC Escrow Issuer, LLC, CRC Finco,
Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee.
Supplemental Indenture (5.25% CRC Notes due 2025), dated December 22, 2017, by and among Caesars Resort
Collection, LLC, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, CRC Finco, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as trustee.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
October 16, 2017.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
December 22, 2017.
CPLV Lease (conformed through the Second Amendment), dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among CPLV Property
Owner LLC, Desert Palace LLC and CEOC, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Third Amendment to CPLV Lease, dated as of September 30, 2020, by and among CPLV Property Owner LLC, Desert
Palace LLC and CEOC, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
on November 9, 2020.
Fourth Amendment to CPLV Lease, dated as of November 18, 2020, by and among CPLV Property Owner LLC, Desert
Palace LLC and CEOC, LLC.
Filed herewith.
Guaranty of Lease, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among Eldorado Resorts, Inc., CPLV Property Owner LLC and
Claudine Propco LLC (CPLV).
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Non-CPLV Lease (conformed through the Fifth Amendment), dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among the entities
listed on Schedules A and B thereto and CEOC, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Sixth Amendment to Non-CPLV Lease, dated as of September 30, 2020, by and among the entities listed on Schedules
A and B thereto and CEOC, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
on November 9, 2020.
64
Exhibit
Number
10.7
10.8
10.9**
10.10**
10.11
10.12
Description of Exhibit
Method of Filing
Seventh Amendment to Non-CPLV Lease, dated as of November 18, 2020, by and among the entities listed on
Schedules A and B thereto and CEOC, LLC.
Filed herewith.
Guaranty of Lease, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and the entities listed on Schedule
A thereto (Non-CPLV).
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Second Amendment, dated as of July 20, 2020, to Lease (Joliet), dated as of October 7, 2017, by and between Harrah’s
Joliet Landco LLC and Des Plaines Development Limited Partnership.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Third Amendment to Lease (Joliet), dated as of September 30, 2020, to Lease (Joliet), dated as of October 7, 2017, by
and between Harrah’s Joliet Landco LLC and Des Plaines Development Limited Partnership.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
on November 9, 2020.
Fourth Amendment to Lease (Joliet), dated as of November 18, 2020, to Lease (Joliet), dated as of October 7, 2017, by
and between Harrah’s Joliet Landco LLC and Des Plaines Development Limited Partnership.
Filed herewith.
Guaranty of Lease, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and between Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and Harrah’s Joliet Landco LLC
(Joliet).
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
10.13*
Right of First Refusal Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and between Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and VICI
Properties L.P. (Las Vegas Strip).
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
10.14
10.15
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.26
Right of First Refusal Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and between Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and VICI
Properties L.P. (Horseshoe Baltimore).
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Second Amendment, dated as of July 20, 2020, to Golf Course Use Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2017, by and
among Rio Secco LLC, Cascata LLC, Chariot Run LLC, Grand Bear LLC, Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC, CEOC,
LLC and, solely for purposes of Section 2.1(c) thereof, Caesars License Company, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Amended and Restated Put-Call Right Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among Claudine Propco, LLC and
Eastside Convention Center, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Second Amended and Restated Put-Call Right Agreement entered into as of September 18, 2020 by and among
Claudine Propco LLC and Caesars Convention Center Owner, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on September 18, 2020.
Put-Call Right Agreement entered into as of July 20, 2020 by and between Centaur Propco LLC and Caesars Resort
Collection, LLC.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Omnibus License and Enterprise Services Agreement, dated as of
July 20, 2020, by and among Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC, CEOC, LLC, Caesars Resort Collection LLC, Caesars
License Company, LLC and Caesars World LLC (including as Exhibit A thereto a conformed copy of the Third
Amended and Restated Omnibus License and Enterprise Services Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2018, as
amended).
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on July
21, 2020.
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among Eldorado Resorts, Inc., the lenders party thereto from time
to time, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Incremental Assumption Agreement No. 1, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among Eldorado Resorts, Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2017, by and among Caesars Resort Collection, LLC, the other borrowers
from time to time party thereto, the lenders party thereto, and Credit Suisse, AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as
administrative agent.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
December 22, 2017.
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2020, by and among Caesars Resort Collection, LLC, the
subsidiary loan parties party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as
administrative agent.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on June
12, 2020.
Incremental Assumption Agreement No. 1, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among Caesars Resort Collection, LLC,
the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as
administrative agent.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Incremental Assumption Agreement No. 2, dated as of July 20, 2020, by and among Caesars Resort Collection, LLC,
the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lender party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as
administrative agent.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on July 21, 2020.
Caesars Entertainment Corporation Amended and Restated Escrow Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2016,
between Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
10.27†
Amendment and Restatement of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective August
3, 2007.
65
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
October 13, 2017.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on August
9, 2007.
Exhibit
Number
10.28†
10.29†
10.30†
10.31†
10.32†
10.33†
10.34
10.35
10.36
Amendment and Restatement of Park Place Entertainment Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan,
effective as of August 3, 2007.
Description of Exhibit
Amendment and Restatement of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Executive Supplemental Savings Plan, effective as of
August 3, 2007.
Amendment and Restatement of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Executive Supplemental Savings Plan II, effective as of
August 3, 2007.
First Amendment to the Amendment and Restatement of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Executive Supplemental Savings
Plan II, effective as of February 9, 2009.
Second Amendment to the Amendment and Restatement of the Caesars Entertainment Corporation Executive
Supplemental Savings Plan II (fka Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Executive Supplemental Savings Plan II), effective as
of November 5, 2014.
Caesars Entertainment Corporation Second Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Trust
Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2016, between Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Trademark License Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2017, between Caesars License Company, LLC and Desert
Palace LLC.
Amended and Restated Casino Operating Contract, dated April 1, 2020, by and between Jazz Casino Company, L.L.C.
and the State of Louisiana, by and through the Louisiana Gaming Control Board.
Method of Filing
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on August
9, 2007.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on August
9, 2007.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on August
9, 2007.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
February 13, 2009.
Previously filed on Form 10-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on March
16, 2015.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
October 13, 2017.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
October 13, 2017.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on April
6, 2020.
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Casino Operating Contract, made and entered into as of April 9, 2020,
and made effective as of April 1, 2020, by and between Jazz Casino Company, L.L.C. and the State of Louisiana, by
and through the Louisiana Gaming Control Board.
Previously filed on Form 8-K/A
filed by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
April 14, 2020.
10.37†
Caesars Entertainment Corporation 2012 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.38†
Amendment No. 1 to the Caesars Entertainment Corporation 2012 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.39†
Amendment No. 2 to the Caesars Entertainment Corporation 2012 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.40†
Amendment No. 3 to the Caesars Entertainment Corporation 2012 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.41†
Amendment No. 4 to the Caesars Entertainment Corporation 2012 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.42†
2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
10.43†
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2009 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.
10.44†
Isle of Capri Casino, Inc. Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement.
10.45†
Caesars Entertainment Corporation 2017 Performance Incentive Plan.
66
Previously filed on Form S-1/A filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
February 2, 2012.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on July
25, 2012.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on May
20, 2015.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on May
20, 2016.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on August
2, 2016.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
by MTR Gaming Group, Inc. on
August 9, 2010.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. on
October 9, 2015.
Previously filed on Form 10-K filed
by Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. on
June 17, 2015.
Previously filed on Form S-8 filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
October 6, 2017.
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
10.46†
Amendment No. 1 to Caesars Entertainment Corporation 2017 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.47†
Caesars Entertainment Corporation Executive Supplemental Savings Plan III.
10.48†
Caesars Entertainment Corporation Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.49†
Caesars Acquisition Company 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.50†
Eldorado Resorts, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan
10.51†
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement.
Method of Filing
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on April
6, 2018.
Previously filed on Form S-8 filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
December 13, 2018.
Previously filed on Form S-8 filed
by Caesars Holdings, Inc. on
December 13, 2018.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
by Caesars Acquisition Company on
April 16, 2014.
Previously filed on Form S-8 POS
filed on June 29, 2019.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
on November 9, 2020.
10.52†
Form of Director Non-Deferred Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the Eldorado Resorts, Inc. 2015
Equity Incentive
Previously filed on Form 10-K filed
on February 28, 2020.
10.53†
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the Amended & Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan.
Filed herewith.
10.54†
10.55†
10.56†
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement Performance-Based (TSR) pursuant to the Amended & Restated 2015
Equity Incentive Plan.
Filed herewith.
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Time-Based Award Agreement pursuant to the Eldorado Resorts, Inc. 2015 Equity
Incentive Plan.
Previously filed on Form 10-K filed
on February 28, 2020.
Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the Eldorado Resorts, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive
Plan.
10.57†
Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the Eldorado Resorts, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.58
10.59†
10.60†
10.61†
10.62†
10.63†
10.64†
10.65†
10.66†
10.67
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2017, by and among Eldorado Resorts, Inc., Recreational
Enterprises, Inc., GFIL Holdings, LLC and certain of its affiliates.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on May 1, 2017.
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2019, by and between Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and Bret
Yunker.
Previously filed on Form 8-K on
February 5, 2019.
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2018, by and between Eldorado
Resorts, Inc. and Gary Carano
Previously filed on Form 8-K on
January 22, 2019.
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated September 28, 2018, by and between
Gary Carano and Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
Previously filed on Form 8-K on
October 1, 2018.
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2018, by and between Eldorado
Resorts, Inc. and Thomas Reeg
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on January 22, 2018.
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated September 28, 2018, by and between
Thomas Reeg and Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on October 1, 2018.
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2018, by and between Eldorado
Resorts, Inc. and Anthony Carano
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on January 22, 2018.
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated September 28, 2018, by and between
Anthony Carano and Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
Previously filed on Form 8-K filed
on October 1, 2018.
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2018, by and between Eldorado
Resorts, Inc. and Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Previously filed on Form 10-K filed
on February 27, 2018.
Amended and Restated Omnibus Amendment to Leases, dated as of October 27, 2020, by and among the entities listed
on schedule A thereto, CPLV Property Owner LLC, Claudine Propco LLC, Harrah’s Joliet Landco LLC, CEOC, LLC,
the entities listed on schedule B thereto, Desert Palace LLC, Harrah’s Las Vegas, LLC and Des Plaines Development
Limited Partnership.
Previously filed on Form 10-Q filed
on November 9, 2020.
67
Previously filed on Registration
Statement Form S-1 filed by
Eldorado Resorts, Inc. June 14,
2015.
Previously filed on Form 10-K filed
on March 1, 2019.
Exhibit
Number
10.68
10.69w
14
21
23.1
23.2
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
99.1
99.2
101.1
101.2
101.3
101.4
101.5
101.6
104
Description of Exhibit
Amended and Restated Master Lease, dated as of June 15, 2020, by and between Tropicana Entertainment, Inc. and
GLP Capital L.P.
Method of Filing
Previously filed on Form 8- K filed
on June 15, 2020.
UK Interim Facilities Agreement dates as of October 6, 2020, by and among a subsidiary of Caesars Entertainment,
Inc.. Deutsche Bank AG. London Branch and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as arrangers.
Previously filed on Form 8-K on
October 8, 2020.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
Certification of Thomas R. Reeg pursuant to Rule 13a-14a and Rule 15d-14(a)
Certification of Bret Yunker pursuant to Rule 13a-14a and Rule 15d-14(a)
Certification of Thomas R. Reeg in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Certification of Bret Yunker in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Gaming and Regulatory Overview
Financial Information of Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
Inline XBRL Instance Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
______________________
†
*
**
w
Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Certain schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K.
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K because such information is (i) not material and (ii) could
be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.
Annexes, schedules and/or exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K.
68
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Dated: February 26, 2021
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
By:
/s/ Thomas R. Reeg
Thomas R. Reeg
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Thomas R. Reeg
Thomas R. Reeg
/s/ Bret Yunker
Bret Yunker
/s/ Stephanie D. Lepori
Stephanie D. Lepori
/s/ Gary L. Carano
Gary L. Carano
/s/ Bonnie Biumi
Bonnie Biumi
/s/ Jan Jones Blackhurst
Jan Jones Blackhurst
/s/ Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr.
Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr.
/s/ Don Kornstein
Don Kornstein
/s/ Courtney Mather
Courtney Mather
/s/ Michael E. Pegram
Michael E. Pegram
/s/ David P. Tomick
David P. Tomick
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and
Director
February 26, 2021
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
February 26, 2021
Chief Administrative and Accounting Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer)
February 26, 2021
Executive Chairman of the Board
February 26, 2021
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
69
February 26, 2021
February 26, 2021
February 26, 2021
February 26, 2021
February 26, 2021
February 26, 2021
February 26, 2021
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
70
Page
71
75
76
77
78
79
81
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020,
the related consolidated statement of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2020,
and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020, and the results of its operations and its
cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial
statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing
procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to
those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits
also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or
required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2)
involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion
on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical
audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Merger with Caesars Entertainment Corporation – Refer to Note 3 to the Financial Statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
On July 20, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of Caesars Entertainment Corporation (“Former Caesars”) for total purchase consideration of
$10.9 billion. The Company accounted for the acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Accordingly, the total
purchase consideration transferred was allocated to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values, which
included $3.4 billion of intangible assets and $8.9 billion of goodwill that was assigned to the Former Caesars reporting units.
The Company used various income approaches to determine the fair value of the acquired intangible assets and reporting units that were assigned goodwill.
These income approaches required management to make significant assumptions and estimates around expected cash flows and projected financial results
related to revenues and EBITDA giving effect to expected changes in operating results in future years (collectively the “forecasts”) as well as the selection
of discount rates. The forecasts and selection of discount rates included assumptions and estimates around the impact of the COVID-19 public health
emergency (“COVID-19”) and the realization of significant identified synergies. Changes in these assumptions and estimates could have a significant
impact on the fair value of the intangible assets and reporting units that were assigned goodwill. Therefore, auditing
71
the forecasts and the selection of discount rates involved a higher degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity as well as an increased level of audit effort,
including the involvement of valuation specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the forecasts and the selection of discount rates used by management to determine the fair value of the acquired intangible
assets and the reporting units that were assigned goodwill included the following:
• We tested the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over the forecasts and the selection of discount rates.
• We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts.
• We evaluated the assumptions and estimates included in the forecasts by: 1) comparing the forecasts to information included in the Company’s
communications to the Board of Directors, earnings and press releases, gaming industry reports, investor presentations, and analyst reports for the
Company and certain of its peer companies; 2) comparing estimated competitive impacts with historical competitive impacts experienced; 3)
assessing the impact of COVID-19 relative to published economic, governmental, and gaming and travel industry expectations; and 4) conducting
inquiries with property management.
• We evaluated management’s ability to accurately estimate the identified synergies by comparing the estimated synergies to actual synergies
realized in historical acquisitions completed by the Company.
• With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the discount rates selected by management, including assessing the impact of the
uncertainty in the forecasts, testing the market-based source information underlying the selection of the discount rates and the mathematical
accuracy of the discount rate calculations, and developing a range of independent estimates and comparing those to the discount rates selected by
management.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Refer to Note 7 to the Financial Statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets balances were $9.7 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2020. The
Company performed its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis as of October 1, 2020. The Company acquired Former
Caesars on July, 20, 2020 and allocated the total purchase consideration transferred to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
respective fair values, including goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, and therefore, the fair value of the Former Caesars reporting units and
indefinite-lived intangible assets do not significantly exceed their respective carrying values. As of October 1, 2020 two of the Company’s other reporting
units in the Regional Segment with goodwill totaling $208 million had fair values that did not significantly exceed their respective carrying values.
Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company recorded $100 million of goodwill impairments related to five other reporting units in
the Regional Segment and $22 million of indefinite-lived intangible asset impairments related to tradenames.
The Company’s evaluation of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment involves the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit
and indefinite-lived intangible asset to its respective carrying value. The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units based on a combination of
EBITDA, valuation multiples, and estimated future cash flows discounted at rates commensurate with the capital structure and cost of capital of
comparable market participants, giving appropriate consideration to the prevailing borrowing rates within the casino industry in general. The Company
determines the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets using either the relief from royalty method or the excess earnings method under the income
approach.
The determination of fair value of its reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets requires management to make significant assumptions and
estimates around the forecasts as well as the selection of discount rates and valuation multiples. Changes in these estimates could have a significant impact
on the fair value of the Company’s reporting units and intangible assets and the amount of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible asset impairments, if any.
The forecasts and the selection of discount rates and valuation multiples used to determine the fair value of the Company’s reporting units and indefinite-
lived intangible assets involved significant assumptions and estimates around the impact of COVID-19 and the realization of significant identified
synergies. Therefore, auditing the forecasts and the selection of discount
72
rates and valuation multiples involved a higher degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity as well as an increased level of audit effort, including the
involvement of valuation specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the forecasts and the selection of discount rates and valuation multiples used by management to determine the fair value of
the Company’s reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets included the following:
• We tested the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over the forecasts and the selection of discount rates and valuation multiples.
• We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts.
• We evaluated the assumptions and estimates included in management’s forecasts by: 1) evaluating the impact of qualitative and quantitative
factors to the impairment conclusions for the Former Caesars reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets subsequent to the acquisition
date; 2) comparing the forecasts to information included in the Company’s communications to the Board of Directors, earnings and press releases,
gaming industry reports, investor presentations, and analyst reports for the Company and certain of its peer companies; 3) comparing estimated
competitive impacts with historical competitive impacts experienced; 4) assessing the impact of COVID-19 relative to published economic,
governmental, and gaming and travel industry expectations; and 5) conducting inquiries with property management.
• We evaluated management’s ability to accurately estimate the identified synergies by comparing the estimated synergies to actual synergies
realized in historical acquisitions completed by the Company.
• With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the discount rates and valuation multiples selected by management, including
assessing the impact of the uncertainty in the forecasts on the discount rates and valuation multiples, testing the market-based source information
underlying the selection of both the discount rates and valuation multiples and the mathematical accuracy of the discount rate and valuation
multiple calculations, and developing a range of independent estimates and comparing those to the discount rates and valuation multiples selected
by management.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 26, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.
73
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Caesars Entertainment, Inc., (formerly Eldorado Resorts Inc.) (the Company) as of
December 31, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (a)(ii)
(collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial
statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing
procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to
those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits
also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2011 to 2020.
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 27, 2020
74
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
CURRENT ASSETS:
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash and investments
Accounts receivable, net
Due from affiliates
Inventories
Prepayments and other current assets
Assets held for sale ($130 and $0 attributable to our VIEs)
Total current assets
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
Property and equipment, net
Gaming licenses and other intangibles, net
Goodwill
Other assets, net
Total assets
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current portion of long-term debt
Accounts payable
Accrued interest
Accrued other liabilities
Liabilities related to assets held for sale ($130 and $0 attributable to our VIEs)
Total current liabilities
Long-term financing obligation
Long-term debt, less current portion
Deferred income taxes
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 208,049,417 and 77,569,117 issued and outstanding, net of treasury shares,
par value $0.00001 as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively
Paid-in capital
(Accumulated deficit) Retained earnings
Treasury stock at cost, 223,823 shares held at December 31, 2020 and 2019
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Caesars stockholders' equity
Noncontrolling interests
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$
$
$
$
1,758 $
2,021
338
44
44
250
2,212
6,667
173
14,333
4,253
9,723
1,236
36,385 $
67 $
165
229
1,239
885
2,585
12,295
14,073
1,166
1,232
31,351
—
6,382
(1,391)
(9)
34
5,016
18
5,034
36,385 $
206
4
54
4
18
66
253
605
136
2,615
1,111
910
264
5,641
246
62
36
307
37
688
971
2,325
197
343
4,524
—
760
366
(9)
—
1,117
—
1,117
5,641
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
75
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
(In millions, except per share data)
REVENUES:
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
Net revenues
EXPENSES:
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
General and administrative
Corporate
Impairment charges
Depreciation and amortization
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Total operating expenses
Operating (loss) income
OTHER EXPENSE:
Interest expense, net
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Other (loss) income
Total other expense
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net (loss) income from continuing operations, net of income taxes
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes
Net (loss) income
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net (loss) income attributable to Caesars
Net (loss) income per share - basic and diluted:
Basic (loss) income per share
Diluted (loss) income per share
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
$
$
$
$
2,337 $
337
450
350
3,474
1,197
261
170
140
882
195
215
583
268
3,911
(437)
(1,174)
(197)
176
(1,195)
(1,632)
(126)
(1,758)
—
(1,758)
1
(1,757) $
(13.50) $
(13.50) $
130
130
1,808 $
301
300
119
2,528
905
239
99
46
503
66
1
222
37
2,118
410
(286)
(8)
9
(285)
125
(44)
81
—
81
—
81 $
1.04 $
1.03 $
78
79
1,553
247
184
72
2,056
824
203
65
39
381
46
14
157
17
1,746
310
(172)
—
(3)
(175)
135
(40)
95
—
95
—
95
1.23
1.22
77
78
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
76
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In millions)
Net (loss) income
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Change in fair market value of interest rate swaps, net of tax
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Comprehensive (loss) income
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Caesars
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
(1,758) $
9
26
35
(1,723)
1
(1)
—
(1,723) $
81 $
—
—
—
81
—
—
—
81 $
95
—
—
—
95
—
—
—
95
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
77
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Caesars Stockholders' Equity
Common Stock
Treasury
Stock
Shares
Amount
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Amount
Noncontrolling
interests
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
76 $
1
—
—
— $
—
—
—
747 $
13
—
—
195 $
—
—
95
— $
—
—
—
— $
—
(9)
—
— $
—
—
—
—
77
—
1
—
—
78
1
67
—
62
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(12)
748
—
20
—
(8)
760
72
3,172
—
2,381
24
—
—
290
(5)
—
81
—
366
—
—
(1,757)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
—
(9)
—
—
—
—
(9)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1)
—
—
1
—
—
—
208 $
—
—
—
— $
(16)
(18)
7
6,382 $
—
—
—
(1,391) $
—
—
—
34 $
—
—
—
(9) $
—
18
—
18 $
942
13
(9)
95
(12)
1,029
(5)
20
81
(8)
1,117
72
3,172
(1,758)
2,381
24
35
(16)
—
7
5,034
(In millions)
Balance, January 1, 2018
Issuance of restricted stock units
Purchase of treasury shares
Net income
Shares withheld related to net share
settlement of stock awards
Balance, December 31, 2018
Cumulative change in accounting
principle, net of tax
Issuance of restricted stock units
Net income
Shares withheld related to net share
settlement of stock awards
Balance, December 31, 2019
Issuance of restricted stock units
Issuance of common stock, net
Net loss
Shares issued to Former Caesars
shareholders
Former Caesars replacement awards
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax
Shares withheld related to net share
settlement of stock awards
Acquired noncontrolling interests
Other
Balance, December 31, 2020
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
78
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
(1,758) $
81 $
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of deferred financing costs, discount and debt premium
Provision for doubtful accounts
Deferred revenue
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Non-cash lease amortization
Unrealized (gain) loss on restricted investment
Stock compensation expense
Loss (gain) on sale of businesses and disposal of property and equipment
Impairment charges
(Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes
Change in fair value of derivative
Foreign currency transaction gain
Other non-cash adjustments to net (loss) income
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Income taxes (receivable) payable
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
Other
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment, net
Former Caesars acquisition, net of cash acquired
Acquisition of gaming rights
Purchase of restricted investments
Proceeds from sale of businesses, property and equipment, net of cash sold
Proceeds from the sale of investments
Net cash used in business combinations
Proceeds from insurance related to property damage
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
Other
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt and revolving credit facilities
Repayments of long-term debt and revolving credit facilities
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing arrangement
Financing obligation payments
Debt issuance and extinguishment costs
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Cash paid to settle convertible notes
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards
Purchase of treasury stock
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
79
583
156
29
(11)
197
14
(34)
78
(7)
215
176
(9)
(129)
(1)
(70)
6
(40)
27
(4)
(582)
(163)
(6,394)
(35)
—
366
25
—
17
(1)
6
(6,179)
9,765
(3,742)
3,224
(49)
(356)
2,718
(903)
(16)
—
10,641
222
18
1
(7)
8
3
(9)
20
(50)
1
(2)
—
—
3
5
10
(22)
31
—
313
(171)
—
—
—
536
5
—
—
(1)
—
369
33
(736)
—
—
(1)
—
—
(8)
—
(712)
95
157
8
2
—
—
1
3
13
1
14
34
—
—
(1)
6
—
7
(17)
—
323
(147)
—
—
(8)
1
—
(1,113)
—
(1)
—
(1,268)
1,161
(70)
—
—
(26)
—
—
(12)
(9)
1,044
(In millions)
CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash from discontinued operations
Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash classified as assets held for sale
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period
RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH TO
AMOUNTS REPORTED WITHIN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Restricted and escrow cash included in other noncurrent assets
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid
Income taxes (refunded) paid, net
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payables for capital expenditures
Exchange for sale-leaseback financing obligation
Shares issued to settle convertible notes
Shares issued to Former Caesars shareholders
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
$
$
11
(6)
5
(15)
129
3,999
217
4,216 $
1,758 $
2,021
437
4,216 $
892 $
(7)
40
246
454
2,381
—
—
—
—
—
(30)
247
217 $
206 $
4
7
217 $
277 $
51
11
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
99
148
247
231
9
7
247
166
(4)
12
—
—
—
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
80
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Caesars Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as
Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (“ERI” or “Eldorado”), and its consolidated subsidiaries which may be referred to as the “Company,” “CEI,” “Caesars,” “we,”
“our,” or “us” within these financial statements.
We also refer to (i) our Consolidated Financial Statements as our “Financial Statements,” (ii) our Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as our “Statements of Operations,” (iii) our Consolidated Balance Sheets as our “Balance
Sheets,” and (iv) our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as our “Statements of Cash Flows.” References to numbered “Notes” refer to Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
The Company is a geographically diversified gaming and hospitality company that was founded in 1973 by the Carano family with the opening of the
Eldorado Hotel Casino in Reno, Nevada. The Company partnered with MGM Resorts International to build Silver Legacy Resort Casino (“Silver Legacy”)
in Reno, Nevada in 1993 and, beginning in 2005, grew through a series of acquisitions, including the acquisition of Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport
(“Eldorado Shreveport”) in 2005, MTR Gaming Group, Inc. in 2014, Circus Circus Reno and the 50% membership interest in the Silver Legacy that was
owned by MGM Resorts International in 2015, Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (“Isle” or “Isle of Capri”) in 2017 and Grand Victoria Casino (“Elgin”) and
Tropicana Entertainment, Inc. (“Tropicana”) in 2018.
On July 20, 2020, the Company completed the merger with Caesars Entertainment Corporation (“Former Caesars”) pursuant to which Former Caesars
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, the Company currently owns, leases or manages an
aggregate of 54 domestic properties in 16 states with approximately 54,600 slot machines, video lottery terminals (“VLTs”) and e-tables, approximately
3,200 table games and approximately 47,700 hotel rooms as of December 31, 2020. We also have international operations in five countries outside of the
U.S. In addition, we have other domestic and international properties that are authorized to use the brands and marks of Caesars Entertainment, Inc., as well
as other non-gaming properties. Upon completion of our previously announced sales, or expected sales of certain gaming properties, we expect to continue
to own, lease or manage 48 properties. See Note 19. The Company’s primary source of revenue is generated by gaming operations, and the Company
utilizes its hotels, restaurants, bars, entertainment, racing, sportsbook offerings, retail shops and other services to attract customers to its properties.
In connection with the Merger, Caesars Entertainment Corporation changed its name to “Caesars Holdings, Inc.” and Eldorado Resorts, Inc. converted into
a Delaware corporation and changed its name to “Caesars Entertainment, Inc.” In addition, effective as of July 21, 2020 the Company’s ticker symbol on
the NASDAQ Stock Market changed from “ERI” to “CZR”. In connection with the Merger, the Company also entered into a Master Transaction
Agreement (the “MTA”) with VICI Properties L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“VICI”), pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed
to consummate certain sale and leaseback transactions and amend certain lease agreements with VICI and/or its affiliates, with respect to certain property
described in the MTA. See Note 3 for further discussion of the Merger and related transactions.
On January 11, 2019 and March 8, 2019, respectively, the Company completed its sales of Presque Isle Downs & Casino (“Presque”) and Lady Luck
Casino Nemacolin (“Nemacolin”), which are both located in Pennsylvania. On December 6, 2019, the Company completed its sales of Mountaineer
Casino, Racetrack and Resort (“Mountaineer”), Isle Casino Cape Girardeau (“Cape Girardeau”) and Lady Luck Casino Caruthersville (“Caruthersville”).
Mountaineer is located in West Virginia and Cape Girardeau and Caruthersville are located in Missouri.
On July 1, 2020, the Company completed the sales of Isle of Capri Casino Kansas City (“Kansas City”) and Lady Luck Casino Vicksburg (“Vicksburg”).
On September 30, 2020, the Company completed the sale of Harrah’s Reno.
On April 24, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive purchase agreement with Twin River Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (“Twin River” or subsequently,
“Bally’s Corporation”) and certain of its affiliates for the sale of the equity interests of Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport Joint Venture and Columbia
Properties Tahoe, LLC, the entities that hold Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport (“Eldorado Shreveport”) and MontBleu Casino Resort & Spa
(“MontBleu”), for aggregate consideration of $155 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The definitive agreement provides that the
consummation of the sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. The sale of Eldorado
Shreveport closed on December 23, 2020 for $140 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment, and the sale of MontBleu is expected to
close in the first half of 2021.
81
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
On September 3, 2020, the Company and VICI entered into an agreement to sell Harrah’s Louisiana Downs Casino, Racing & Entertainment (“Harrah’s
Louisiana Downs”) to Rubico Acquisition Corp. for $22 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment, which proceeds will be split between
the Company and VICI. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to
close in the first half of 2021.
In connection with its review of the Merger, the Indiana Gaming Commission determined on July 16, 2020 that, as a condition to their approval of the
Merger, the Company is required to enter into agreements to divest of three properties within the state of Indiana in order to avoid undue economic
concentration. As discussed below, the Company has entered into agreements to sell Tropicana Evansville (“Evansville”) and Caesars Southern Indiana.
The Company plans to enter into an agreement to divest Horseshoe Hammond prior to December 31, 2021, as the deadline was extended by the Indiana
Gaming Commission.
On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Evansville to GLPI and Twin River for $480 million in cash, subject to a customary
working capital adjustment. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to
close in mid-2021.
Also on October 27, 2020, in conjunction with the execution of the agreement to sell Evansville, the Company’s subsidiaries, Isle Casino Bettendorf and
Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo (collectively, the “Exchanging Subsidiaries”), entered into an Exchange Agreement with GLPI pursuant to which the
Exchanging Subsidiaries agreed to transfer the real estate relating to the Isle Casino Bettendorf and Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo to GLPI in exchange for the
real estate relating to Evansville. The exchange transaction closed on December 18, 2020 and as a result of the lease being classified as a financing
obligation the exchange was accounted for as a debt modification. As a result of the exchange, the real estate relating to Evansville was removed from the
master lease with GLPI that we entered into in connection with the acquisition of Tropicana (the “GLPI Master Lease”) and the real estate relating to Isle
Casino Bettendorf and Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo is now subject to the GLPI Master Lease.
On November 18, 2020, the sale of Bally's Atlantic City to Bally’s Corporation was completed for $25 million, of which, we received 25% and VICI
received 75%. In addition, on October 9, 2020, we reached an agreement to sell the Bally’s brand to Bally’s Corporation for $20 million, while retaining
the right to use the brand within Bally’s Las Vegas into perpetuity. Caesars agreed to reimburse Bally’s Corporation $30 million for capital expenditures
required at Bally’s Atlantic City and recorded a liability within Accrued other liabilities and recorded a charge to Discontinued operations, net of income
taxes. Our commitment will be satisfied by adjusting obligations under certain sportsbook operating agreements between Bally’s Corporation and the
Company following our expected acquisition of William Hill.
On December 1, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Belle of Baton Rouge (“Baton Rouge”) to CQ Holding Company, Inc. Pursuant
to the terms of the GLPI Master Lease, Baton Rouge will be removed from the GLPI Master Lease, and the rent payments to GLPI will remain unchanged.
GLPI will retain ownership of the real estate of Baton Rouge. The transaction is expected to close in mid-2021 and is subject to regulatory approvals and
other customary closing conditions.
On December 24, 2020, the Company entered into agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana to Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (“EBCI”) for
$250 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. Caesar’s annual payments to VICI under the Regional Lease (as defined below) will
decline by $33 million upon closing of the transaction. Additionally, effective as of the closing of the transaction, Caesars and EBCI will enter into a long-
term agreement for the continued use of the Caesars brand and Caesars Rewards loyalty program at Caesars Southern Indiana. The sale is subject to
satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021.
Former Caesars properties, including Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, Caesars Southern Indiana, Horseshoe Hammond, Harrah’s Reno, Caesars UK group,
including Emerald Resort & Casino, and Bally’s Atlantic City, have met held for sale criteria as of the date of the closing of the Merger. The sales of these
properties have or are expected to close within one year from the date of the closing of the Merger and the properties are classified as discontinued
operations.
Proposed Acquisition of William Hill
The Company has entered into agreements, which became effective January 29, 2019, with William Hill plc and William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc. (“William
Hill US”), its U.S. subsidiary (together, “William Hill”) which granted to William Hill the right to conduct betting activities, including operating certain of
our sportsbooks, in retail channels under certain skins (described below) for online channels with respect to the Company’s current and future properties,
and conduct certain real money online gaming activities. The Company received a 20% ownership interest in William Hill US as well as 13 million
ordinary shares of William Hill plc, which carry certain time restrictions on when they can be sold. See Note 5 related to the investments in William Hill.
Additionally, the Company receives a profit share from the operations of sports betting and other gaming activities associated with the Company’s
properties.
82
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
On September 30, 2020, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement with William Hill plc on the terms of a recommended cash acquisition
pursuant to which the Company would acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital (other than shares owned by the Company or held in
treasury) of William Hill plc, in an all-cash transaction of approximately £2.9 billion, or $3.7 billion. To provide liquidity to fund the cash purchase price
for the proposed acquisition, the Company entered into various financing transactions. On September 25, 2020, the Company borrowed $900 million under
the CEI Revolving Credit Facility (defined below), which was fully repaid in October 2020. See Note 12. On October 1, 2020, the Company raised
approximately $1.9 billion through a public offering of Company Common Stock, which was deposited into an escrow account. As of December 31, 2020,
these funds in escrow were classified as restricted cash and will remain restricted until the proposed acquisition of William Hill plc closes. See Note 15. In
order to manage the risk of appreciation of the GBP denominated purchase price the Company has entered into a foreign exchange forward contract. See
Note 8.
In connection with the proposed acquisition of William Hill plc, on September 29, 2020, the Company entered into a debt financing commitment letter
pursuant to which the lenders party thereto have committed to arrange and provide a newly formed subsidiary of the Company with (a) a £1.0 billion senior
secured 540-day bridge loan facility, (b) a £116 million senior secured 540-day revolving credit facility and (c) a £503 million senior secured 60-day bridge
loan facility (collectively, the “Debt Financing”). The proceeds of the Debt Financing will be used (i) to pay a portion of the cash consideration for the
proposed acquisition, (ii) to refinance certain of William Hill plc's and its subsidiaries' existing debt, (iii) to pay fees and expenses related to the acquisition
and related transactions and (iv) for working capital and general corporate purposes.
Pending negotiation of the loan agreement for the Debt Financing, on October 6, 2020, a newly formed subsidiary of the Company entered into a
£1.5 billion interim facilities agreement (the “Interim Facilities Agreement”) with Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to
provide: (a) a 90-day £1.0 billion interim asset sale bridge facility and (b) a 90-day £503 million interim cash confirmation bridge facility, which agreement
will be terminated upon the execution of the loan agreement for the Debt Financing.
The transaction is conditioned on, among other things, the approval of William Hill plc shareholders, which was received on November 19, 2020, and
receipt of required regulatory approvals. On December 28, 2020, we obtained the early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”) relating to the proposed combination with William Hill plc. A final UK court hearing is scheduled for the
last week of March 2021 and we expect to close the acquisition shortly thereafter.
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), which
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. Management believes the accounting estimates are appropriate and reasonably determined. Actual amounts could differ
from those estimates.
The executive decision maker of the Company reviews operating results, assesses performance and makes decisions on a “significant market” basis.
Management views each of the Company’s casinos as an operating segment. Operating segments are aggregated based on their similar economic
characteristics, types of customers, types of services and products provided, and their management and reporting structure. Prior to the Merger, our
principal operating activities occurred in five geographic regions and reportable segments: West, Midwest, South, East and Central, in addition to Corporate
and Other. Following the Merger, the Company’s principal operating activities occur in three regionally-focused reportable segments. The reportable
segments are based on the similar characteristics of the operating segments with the way management assesses these results and allocates resources, which
is a consolidated view that adjusts for the effect of certain transactions between these reportable segments within Caesars: (1) Las Vegas, (2) Regional, and
(3) Managed, International, CIE, in addition to Corporate and Other. See Note 19 for a listing of properties included in each segment.
The presentation of financial information herein for the period after the Company’s acquisition of Former Caesars on July 20, 2020 is not fully comparable
to the periods prior to the acquisition. In addition, the presentation of financial information herein for the periods after the Company’s sales of various
properties are not fully comparable to the periods prior to their respective sale dates. See Note 4 for details.
Consolidation of Subsidiaries and Variable Interest Entities
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Caesars and its subsidiaries after elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions.
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
We consolidate all subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest and VIEs for which we or one of our consolidated subsidiaries is the
primary beneficiary. Control generally equates to ownership percentage, whereby (i) affiliates
83
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
that are more than 50% owned are consolidated; (ii) investments in affiliates of 50% or less but greater than 20% are generally accounted for using the
equity method where we have determined that we have significant influence over the entities; and (iii) investments in affiliates of 20% or less are generally
accounted for as investments in equity securities.
We consider ourselves the primary beneficiary of a VIE when we have both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the results of the
VIE and the right to receive benefits or the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could be potentially significant to the VIE. We review our
investments for VIE consideration if a reconsideration event occurs to determine if the investment continues to qualify as a VIE. If we determine an
investment no longer qualifies as a VIE, there may be a material effect to our financial statements.
Consolidation of Korea Joint Venture
The Company has a joint venture to acquire, develop, own, and operate a casino resort project in Incheon, South Korea (the “Korea JV”). We determined
that the Korea JV is a VIE and the Company is the primary beneficiary, and therefore, we consolidate the Korea JV into our financial statements. As of
December 31, 2020, the assets and liabilities of the Korea JV were classified as held for sale. The sale subsequently closed on January 21, 2021. See
Note 4.
Recent Developments Related to COVID-19
In January 2020, an outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was identified and has since spread throughout much of the world, including
the United States. All of the Company’s casino properties were temporarily closed for the period from mid-March 2020 through mid-May 2020 due to
orders issued by various government agencies and tribal bodies as part of certain precautionary measures intended to help slow the spread of the COVID-
19 public health emergency. On May 15, 2020, the Company began reopening properties and has resumed certain operations at substantially all of our
properties as of December 31, 2020, with the exception of additional temporary closures of Caesars Windsor, Harrah’s Philadelphia, and our properties in
Illinois. Subsequently, Harrah’s Philadelphia and our properties in Illinois have reopened. The COVID-19 public health emergency has had a material
adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company continued to
pay its full-time employees through April 10, 2020, including tips and tokens. Effective April 11, 2020, the Company furloughed approximately 90% of its
employees, implemented salary reductions and committed to continue to provide benefits to its employees during the duration of their respective furlough
period. A portion of the Company’s workforce has returned to service as the properties have resumed with limited capacities and in compliance with
operating restrictions imposed by governmental or tribal orders, directives, and guidelines. Due to a triggering event resulting from the COVID-19 public
health emergency, the Company recognized impairment charges related to goodwill and trade names during the year ended December 31, 2020. See Note 7
for details.
Due to the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency on the Company’s results of operations, in June 2020 the Company obtained waivers
on the financial covenants in its Former Caesars credit facility agreement and the GLPI Master Lease. In addition, Former Caesars obtained a waiver of the
financial covenant in the credit agreement by and among Caesars Resort Collection, LLC and the lenders thereunder (the “CRC Credit Agreement”).
Furthermore, the Company obtained waivers from VICI in relation to annual capital expenditure requirements for 2020. See Note 12 for details.
The extent of the ongoing and future effects of the COVID-19 public health emergency on the Company’s business and the casino resort industry generally
is uncertain, but the Company expects that it will continue to have a significant impact on its business, results of operations and financial condition. The
extent and duration of the impact of COVID-19 will ultimately depend on future developments, including but not limited to, the duration and severity of
the outbreak, restrictions on operations imposed by governmental authorities, the potential for authorities reimposing stay at home orders or additional
restrictions in response to continued developments with the COVID-19 public health emergency, the Company’s ability to adapt to evolving operating
procedures, the impact on consumer demand and discretionary spending, the length of time it takes for demand to return, the efficacy and availability of
vaccines and the Company’s ability to adjust its cost structures for the duration of the outbreak’s effect on its operations.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Additional significant accounting policy disclosures are provided within the applicable notes to the Financial Statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents include investments in money market funds that can be redeemed immediately at the current net asset value
per share. A money market fund is a mutual fund whose investments are primarily in short-term debt securities designed to maximize current income with
liquidity and capital preservation, usually maintaining per share net asset value at a constant amount, such as one dollar. Cash and cash equivalents also
include cash maintained for gaming operations. The carrying amounts approximate the fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments (Level
1).
84
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Restricted Cash and Investments. The significant portion of our restricted cash relates to $1.9 billion, which was primarily raised from the proceeds of our
sale of common stock to fund a portion of the purchase price for the proposed acquisition of William Hill (See Note 1). Restricted cash also includes
certificates of deposit and cash restricted under certain operating agreements or restricted for future capital expenditures in the normal course of business.
Investments consist primarily of debt and equity securities, held by the Company’s captive insurance subsidiaries, which are regularly purchased with the
intention to resell in the short term. Restricted investments include shares acquired in conjunction with the Company’s sports betting agreements with
William Hill that contain restrictions related to the ability to liquidate shares within a specified timeframe. The trading securities are carried at fair value
with changes in fair value recognized in current period income (See Note 8).
Advertising. Advertising costs are expensed in the period the advertising initially takes place and are included in marketing and promotions expenses
within operating expenses. Advertising costs included in marketing and promotion expenses were $64 million, $29 million and $34 million for the years
ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior year presentations have been made to conform to the current period presentation. Marketing and promotions expense
previously disclosed for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 has been reclassified to Casino and pari-mutuel commissions expense and General
and administrative expense based on the nature of the expense.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Pronouncements Implemented in 2020
In June 2016 (modified in November 2018), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit
Losses related to the timing of recognizing impairment losses on financial assets. The new guidance lowers the threshold on when losses are incurred, from
a determination that a loss is probable to a determination that a loss is expected. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019. Adoption of the guidance required a modified-retrospective approach and a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings to the first
reporting period that the update is effective. The Company adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2020. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a
Service Contract. This amendment aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract
with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an
internal use software license). This generally means that an intangible asset is recognized for the software license and, to the extent that the payments
attributable to the software license are made over time, a liability also is recognized. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license,
the entity should account for the arrangement as a service contract. This generally means that the fees associated with the hosting element (service) of the
arrangement are expensed as incurred. The amendment was effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company
adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2020. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This
amendment modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and was effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December
15, 2019. The Company adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2020. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General. This amendment improves
disclosures over defined benefit plans and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2020 with early adoption allowed. The
Company adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2021, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This amendment modifies accounting guidelines for
income taxes and is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020 with early adoption allowed. We adopted the new guidance
during the fourth quarter of 2020 on a prospective basis for each topic applicable to the Company, with the exception of amendments related to entities not
subject to tax, which was applied retrospectively. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements.
85
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Pronouncements to Be Implemented in Future Periods
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04 (amended through January 2021), Reference Rate Reform. The amendments in this update are intended to
provide relief to the companies that have contracts, hedging relationships or other transactions that reference the London Inter-bank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”) or another reference rate which is expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform on a prospective basis. The amendments
provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions if certain criteria are met. The
adoption of, and future elections under, ASU 2020-04 are not expected to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements as the standard
will ease, if warranted, the requirements for accounting for the future effects of the rate reform. The amendments in this update are effective as of March
12, 2020 and companies may elect to apply the amendments prospectively through December 31, 2022. The Company has not yet adopted this new
guidance as of December 31, 2020 and is evaluating the qualitative and quantitative effect the new guidance will have on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options and Derivatives and Hedging. This update amends guidance on
convertible instruments and the guidance on derivative scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity. The amendments for convertible instruments
reduce the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock. In addition, the amendments provide guidance on
instruments that will continue to be subject to separation models and improves disclosure for convertible instruments and guidance for earnings per share.
Furthermore, the update amends guidance for the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity to reduce form-over-substance-based
accounting conclusions. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. These amendments should be applied on either a modified retrospective basis or a fully retrospective basis. The Company is currently
assessing the effect the adoption of this standard will have on our prospective financial statements.
Note 3. Acquisitions, Purchase Price Accounting and Pro forma Information
Merger with Caesars Entertainment Corporation
On July 20, 2020, the Merger was consummated and Former Caesars became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The strategic rationale for the
Merger includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Creation of the largest owner, operator and manager of domestic gaming assets
•
• Diversification of the Company’s domestic footprint
• Access to iconic brands, rewards programs and new gaming opportunities expected to enhance customer experience
•
Realization of significant identified synergies
The total purchase consideration for Former Caesars was $10.9 billion. The estimated purchase consideration in the acquisition was determined with
reference to its acquisition date fair value.
(In millions)
Cash consideration paid
Shares issued to Former Caesars shareholders
Cash paid to retire Former Caesars debt
Other consideration paid
Total purchase consideration
Consideration
6,090
2,381
2,356
48
10,875
$
$
Based on the closing price of $38.24 per share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“Company Common Stock”), reported on
NASDAQ on July 20, 2020, the aggregate implied value of the aggregate merger consideration paid to former holders of Former Caesars common stock in
connection with the Merger was approximately $8.5 billion, including approximately $2.4 billion in the Company Common Stock and approximately
$6.1 billion in cash. The aggregate merger consideration transferred also included approximately $2.4 billion related to the repayment of certain
outstanding debt balances of Former Caesars and approximately $48 million of other consideration paid which includes $19 million related to a transaction
success fee, for the benefit of Former Caesars, and $29 million for the replacement of equity awards of certain employees attributable to services provided
prior to the Merger.
Pursuant to the Merger, each share of Former Caesars common stock was converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof and
subject to proration, approximately $12.41 of cash consideration or approximately 0.3085 shares of Company Common Stock, with a value equal to
approximately $12.41 in cash (based on the volume weighted average price per share of Company Common Stock for the 10 trading days ending on July
16, 2020). Following the consummation of the Merger, stockholders of the Company and stockholders of Former Caesars held approximately 61% and
39%, respectively, of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock.
86
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
The fair values are based on management’s analysis including preliminary work performed by third party valuation specialists, which are subject to
finalization over the one-year measurement period. The purchase price accounting for Former Caesars is preliminary as it relates to determining the fair
value of certain assets and liabilities, including goodwill, and is subject to change. The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the
purchase consideration to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Former Caesars, with the excess recorded as goodwill as of
December 31, 2020:
(In millions)
Current and other assets
Property and equipment
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Other noncurrent assets
(a)
Total assets
Current liabilities
Financing obligation
Long-term debt
Noncurrent liabilities
Total liabilities
Noncontrolling interests
Net assets acquired
Fair Value
4,149
12,691
8,922
3,364
676
29,802
1,836
8,149
6,591
2,333
18,909
18
10,875
$
$
$
$
____________________
(a)
Intangible assets consist of gaming licenses valued at $388 million, trade names valued at $2.1 billion, the Caesars Rewards programs valued at $523 million and customer relationships
valued at $403 million.
As noted above, the preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to a measurement period and has since been revised during the fourth quarter ended
December 31, 2020, from our initial estimates. The net impact of these changes in our initial valuations was a $273 million increase to goodwill. Changes
included a $115 million decrease to current and other assets, a $39 million decrease in property and equipment, a $185 million decrease in intangible assets,
and an $8 million decrease in other noncurrent assets. Additionally, current liabilities were decreased by $60 million, the assumed financing obligation was
increased by $15 million and noncurrent liabilities were decreased by $29 million. The effect of these revisions during the fourth quarter did not have a
material impact on our Statement of operations.
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined using the market, income, and cost approaches, or a combination. Valuation
methodologies under both a market and income approach used for the identifiable net assets acquired in the Former Caesars acquisition make use of Level
3 inputs, such as expected cash flows and projected financial results. The market approach indicates value for a subject asset based on available market
pricing for comparable assets.
Trade receivables and payables and other current and noncurrent assets and liabilities were valued at the existing carrying values as they represented the
estimated fair value of those items at the Former Caesars acquisition date. Assets and liabilities held for sale are recorded at fair value, less costs to sell,
based on the agreements reached as of the acquisition date, or an income approach.
Certain financial assets acquired were determined to have experienced more than insignificant deterioration of credit quality since origination. A
reconciliation of the difference between the purchase price of financial assets, including acquired markers, and the face value of the assets is as follows:
(In millions)
Purchase price of financial assets
Allowance for credit losses at the acquisition date based on the acquirer’s assessment
Discount / (premium) attributable to other factors
Face value of financial assets
$
$
95
89
2
186
The fair value of land was determined using the sales comparable approach. The market data is then adjusted for any significant differences, to the extent
known, between the identified comparable sites and the site being valued. The value of building and site improvements was estimated via the income
approach. Other personal property assets such as furniture, gaming and computer equipment, fixtures, computer software, and restaurant equipment were
valued using the cost approach which is based
87
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
on replacement or reproduction costs of the asset. The cost approach is an estimation of fair value developed by computing the current cost of replacing a
property and subtracting any depreciation resulting from one or more of the following factors: physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and/or
economic obsolescence.
Non-amortizing intangible assets acquired primarily include trademarks, Caesars Rewards and gaming rights. The fair value for these intangible assets was
determined using either the relief from royalty method and excess earnings method under the income approach or a replacement cost market approach.
Trademarks and Caesars Rewards were valued using the relief from royalty method, which presumes that without ownership of such trademarks or loyalty
program, the Company would have to make a stream of payments to a brand or franchise owner in return for the right to use their name or program. By
virtue of this asset, the Company avoids any such payments and records the related intangible value of the Company’s ownership of the brand name or
program. The acquired Trademarks, including Caesars Rewards are indefinite lived intangible assets.
Customer relationships are valued using an income approach, comparing the prospective cash flows with and without the customer relationships in place to
estimate the fair value of the customer relationships, with the fair value assumed to be equal to the discounted cash flows of the business that would be lost
if the customer relationships were not in place and needed to be replaced. We estimate the useful life of these customer relationships to be approximately
seven years.
Gaming rights include our gaming licenses in various jurisdictions and may have indefinite lives or an estimated useful life. The fair value of the gaming
rights was determined using the excess earnings or replacement cost methodology, based on whether the license resides in gaming jurisdictions where
competition is limited to a specified number of licensed gaming operators. The excess earnings methodology is an income approach methodology that
estimates the projected cash flows of the business attributable to the gaming license intangible asset, which is net of charges for the use of other identifiable
assets of the business including working capital, fixed assets and other intangible assets. The replacement cost of the gaming license was used as an
indicator of fair value. The acquired gaming rights have indefinite lives, with the exception of one jurisdiction in which we estimate the useful life of the
license to be approximately 34 years.
Goodwill is the result of expected synergies from the operations of the combined company and the assembled workforce of Former Caesars. The final
assignment of goodwill to reporting units has not been completed. The goodwill acquired will not generate amortization deductions for income tax
purposes.
The fair value of long-term debt has been calculated based on market quotes. The fair value of the financing obligations were calculated as the net present
value of both the fixed base rent payments and the forecasted variable payments plus the expected residual value of the land and building returned at the
end of the expected usage period.
The Company recognized acquisition-related transaction costs in connection with the merger with Former Caesars of $160 million and $80 million for the
years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. These costs were associated with legal, IT costs, internal labor and professional services and were
recognized as Transaction costs and other operating costs in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For the period of July 20, 2020 through December 31, 2020, Former Caesars generated net revenues of $2.0 billion and net loss of $1.2 billion.
Tropicana
Acquisition Summary
On April 15, 2018, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Tropicana in a cash transaction valued at $1.9 billion
(the “Tropicana Acquisition”). At the closing of the transaction on October 1, 2018, a subsidiary of the Company merged into Tropicana and Tropicana
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Immediately prior to the merger, Tropicana sold Tropicana Aruba Resort and Casino and Gaming and
Leisure Properties, Inc. (“GLPI”) acquired substantially all of Tropicana’s real estate, other than the real estate underlying MontBleu and Lumière, for
approximately $964 million. The Company acquired Tropicana’s operations and certain real estate for $927 million. Substantially concurrently with the
acquisition of the real estate portfolio by GLPI, the Company also entered into a triple net master lease with GLPI (the “Master Lease”) (see Note 10). The
Company funded the purchase of the real estate underlying Lumière with the proceeds of a $246 million loan and funded the remaining consideration
payable with cash on hand at the Company and Tropicana, borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility and proceeds from the Company’s
offering of $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 6% senior notes due 2026. These instruments were refinanced during 2020 (see Note 12).
Transaction expenses related to the Tropicana Acquisition totaled $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
88
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Final Purchase Price Accounting
The total purchase consideration for the Tropicana Acquisition was $927 million. The purchase consideration in the acquisition was determined with
reference to its acquisition date fair value.
(In millions)
Cash consideration paid
Lumière Loan
Cash paid to retire Tropicana's long-term debt
ERI portion of taxes due
Purchase consideration
Consideration
640
246
35
6
927
$
$
The fair values are based on management’s analysis including work performed by third party valuation specialists. The following table summarizes the
final allocation of the purchase consideration to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Tropicana, with the excess recorded as goodwill
as of December 31, 2019:
(In millions)
Current and other assets
Property and equipment
Property subject to the financing obligation
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Other noncurrent assets
(a)
Total assets
Current liabilities
Financing obligation to GLPI
Noncurrent liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets acquired
Fair Value
179
436
957
211
248
55
2,086
175
957
27
1,159
927
$
$
$
$
____________________
(a)
Intangible assets consist of gaming licenses valued at $125 million, trade names valued at $67 million and customer relationships valued at $56 million.
As of September 30, 2019, the Company finalized its valuation procedures and adjusted the Tropicana preliminary purchase price accounting to their final
values. The net impact of these changes was a $9 million decrease to goodwill. Changes included a $16 million increase to other noncurrent assets
primarily related to certain long-term receivables offset by $7 million of other changes to liabilities.
Valuation methodologies under both a market and income approach used for the identifiable net assets acquired in the Tropicana Acquisition make use of
Level 3 inputs including discounted cash flows.
Trade receivables and payables, inventories and other current and noncurrent assets and liabilities were valued at the existing carrying values as they
represented the estimated fair value of those items at the Tropicana Acquisition date.
The fair value of land (excluding the real property acquired by GLPI) was determined using the market approach, which arrives at an indication of value by
comparing the site being valued to sites that have been recently acquired in arm’s-length transactions. The market data is then adjusted for any significant
differences, to the extent known, between the identified comparable sites and the site being valued. Building and site improvements were valued under the
cost approach using a direct cost model built on estimates of replacement cost. Personal property assets with an active and identifiable secondary market
such as riverboats, gaming equipment, computer equipment and vehicles were valued using the market approach. Other personal property assets such as
furniture, fixtures, computer software, and restaurant equipment were valued using the cost approach which is based on replacement or reproduction costs
of the asset. The cost approach is an estimation of fair value developed by computing the current cost of replacing a property and subtracting any
depreciation resulting from one or more of the following factors: physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and/or economic obsolescence. The
income approach incorporates all tangible and intangible property and served as a ceiling for the fair values of the acquired assets of the ongoing business
enterprise, while still taking into account the premise of highest and best use. In the instance where the business enterprise value developed via the income
approach was exceeded by the initial fair values of the underlying assets, an adjustment to reflect economic obsolescence was made to the tangible assets
on a pro rata basis to reflect the contributory value of each individual asset to the enterprise as a whole.
89
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The real estate assets that were sold to GLPI and leased back by the Company were adjusted to fair value concurrently with the acquisition of Tropicana.
The fair value of the properties was determined utilizing the direct capitalization method of the income approach. In allocating the fair value to the
underlying acquired assets, a fair value for the buildings and improvements was determined using the above mentioned cost approach method. To
determine the underlying land value, the extraction method was applied wherein the fair value of the building and improvements was deducted from the fair
value of the property as derived from the direct capitalization approach to determine the fair value of the land. The fair value of GLPI’s real estate assets
was determined to be $957 million.
The fair value of the gaming licenses was determined using the multi period excess earnings or replacement cost methodology, based on whether the
license resides in gaming jurisdictions where competition is limited to a specified number of licensed gaming operators. The excess earnings methodology
is an income approach methodology that estimates the projected cash flows of the business attributable to the gaming license intangible asset, which is net
of charges for the use of other identifiable assets of the business including working capital, fixed assets and other intangible assets. Under the respective
state’s gaming legislation, the property specific licenses can only be acquired if a theoretical buyer were to acquire each existing facility. The existing
licenses could not be acquired and used for a different facility. The properties’ estimated future cash flows were the primary assumption in the respective
valuations. Cash flow estimates included net gaming revenue, gaming operating expenses, general and administrative expenses, and tax expense. The
replacement cost methodology is a cost approach methodology based on replacement or reproduction cost of the gaming license as an indicator of fair
value.
The Company has assigned an indefinite useful life to the gaming licenses. The Company considered, among other things, the expected use of the asset, the
expected useful life of other related assets or asset groups, any legal, regulatory, or contractual provisions that may limit the useful life, the Company’s own
historical experience in renewing similar arrangements, the effects of obsolescence, demand and other economic factors, and the maintenance expenditures
required to obtain the expected cash flows. The Company determined that no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors limit the
useful lives of these intangible assets. Tropicana had licenses in New Jersey, Missouri, Mississippi, Nevada, Indiana, and Louisiana. The renewal of each
state’s gaming license depends on a number of factors, including payment of certain fees and taxes, providing certain information to the state’s gaming
regulator, and meeting certain inspection requirements. However, the Company’s historical experience has not indicated, nor does the Company expect, any
limitations regarding its ability to continue to renew each license. No other competitive, contractual, or economic factor limits the useful lives of these
assets. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that the useful lives of these licenses are indefinite.
Trade names were valued using the relief from royalty method, which presumes that without ownership of such trademarks, the Company would have to
make a stream of payments to a brand or franchise owner in return for the right to use their name. By virtue of this asset, the Company avoids any such
payments and records the related intangible value of the Company’s ownership of the brand name. The primary assumptions in the valuation included
revenue, pre-tax royalty rate, and tax expense. The Company has assigned an indefinite useful life to the trade names after considering, among other things,
the expected use of the asset, the expected useful life of other related assets or asset groups, any legal, regulatory, or contractual provisions that may limit
the useful life, the Company’s own historical experience in renewing similar arrangements, the effects of obsolescence, demand and other economic
factors, and the maintenance expenditures required to obtain the expected cash flows. In that analysis, the Company determined that no legal, regulatory,
contractual, competitive, economic or other factors limit the useful lives of these intangible assets.
Customer relationships were valued using the cost approach and the incremental cash flow method under the income approach. The incremental cash flow
method is used to estimate the fair value of an intangible asset based on a residual cash flow notion. This method measures the benefits (e.g., cash flows)
derived from ownership of an acquired intangible asset as if it were in place, as compared to the acquirer’s expected cash flows as if the intangible asset
were not in place (i.e., with-and-without). The residual or net cash flows of the two models is ascribable to the intangible asset. The Company has
estimated a 3-year useful life on the customer relationships.
Goodwill is the result of expected synergies from combining operations of the acquired and acquirer. The goodwill acquired is fully amortizable for tax
purposes.
For the period from the Tropicana acquisition date of October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, Tropicana generated net revenues of $205 million and
net loss of $9 million.
Elgin
Final Purchase Price Accounting
On August 7, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of one hundred percent of the partnership interests in Elgin. As a result of the Elgin
Acquisition, Elgin became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company purchased
90
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Elgin for $328 million plus a $1 million working capital adjustment. The Elgin Acquisition was financed using cash on hand and borrowings under the
Company’s revolving credit facility.
Transaction expenses related to the Elgin Acquisition totaled less than $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The total purchase consideration for the Elgin Acquisition was $329 million. The purchase consideration in the acquisition was determined with reference
to its acquisition date fair value.
(In millions)
Cash consideration paid
Working capital and other adjustments
Purchase consideration
Consideration
328
1
329
$
$
The fair values are based on management’s analysis including work performed by third party valuation specialists. As of September 30, 2019, the Company
finalized its valuation procedures and no changes were recorded to the acquisition date fair values as disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2018. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase consideration to the identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed of Elgin, with the excess recorded as goodwill as of December 31, 2019:
(In millions)
Current and other
Property and equipment
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Other noncurrent assets
(a)
Total assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets acquired
Consideration
25
61
60
206
1
353
22
2
24
329
$
$
$
$
____________________
(a)
Intangible assets consist of gaming licenses valued at $164 million, trade names valued at $13 million and customer relationships valued at $29 million.
Valuation methodologies under both a market and income approach used for the identifiable net assets acquired in the Elgin Acquisition made use of Level
3 inputs including discounted cash flows.
Trade receivables and payables, inventories and other current and noncurrent assets and liabilities were valued at the existing carrying values as they
represented the estimated fair value of those items at the Elgin Acquisition date.
The fair value of land was determined using the market approach, which arrives at an indication of value by comparing the site being valued to sites that
have been recently acquired in arm’s-length transactions. The market data is then adjusted for any significant differences, to the extent known, between the
identified comparable sites and the site being valued. Building and site improvements were valued under the cost approach using a direct cost model built
on estimates of replacement cost. Personal property assets with an active and identifiable secondary market such as riverboats, gaming equipment,
computer equipment and vehicles were valued using the market approach. Other personal property assets such as furniture, fixtures, computer software, and
restaurant equipment were valued using the cost approach which is based on replacement or reproduction costs of the asset.
The cost approach is an estimation of fair value developed by computing the current cost of replacing a property and subtracting any depreciation resulting
from one or more of the following factors: physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and/or economic obsolescence. The income approach
incorporates all tangible and intangible property and served as a ceiling for the fair values of the acquired assets of the ongoing business enterprise, while
still taking into account the premise of highest and best use.
The Company has assigned an indefinite useful life to the gaming licenses. The fair value of the gaming license was determined using the multi period
excess earnings method. The excess earnings methodology, which is an income approach methodology that allocates the projected cash flows of the
business to the gaming license intangible assets less charges for the use of other identifiable assets of Elgin including working capital, fixed assets and
other intangible assets. This methodology was considered
91
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
appropriate as the gaming license is the primary asset of Elgin. The property’s estimated future cash flows were the primary assumption in the respective
valuations. Cash flow estimates included net gaming revenue, gaming operating expenses, general and administrative expenses, and tax expense. The
renewal of the gaming license depends on a number of factors, including payment of certain fees and taxes, providing certain information to the state’s
gaming regulator, and meeting certain inspection requirements. However, the Company’s historical experience has not indicated, nor does the Company
expect, any limitations regarding its ability to continue to renew the license. No other competitive, contractual, or economic factor limits the useful lives of
this asset. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that the useful life of this license is indefinite.
Customer relationships were valued using the cost approach and the incremental cash flow method under the income approach. The incremental cash flow
method is used to estimate the fair value of an intangible asset based on a residual cash flow notion. This method measures the benefits (e.g., cash flows)
derived from ownership of an acquired intangible asset as if it were in place, as compared to the acquirer’s expected cash flows as if the intangible asset
were not in place (i.e., with-and-without). The residual or net cash flows of the two models is ascribable to the intangible asset. The Company has
estimated a four-year useful life on the customer relationships.
The trade name was valued using the relief-from-royalty method. The primary assumptions in the valuation included revenue, pre-tax royalty rate, and tax
expense. The Company has assigned the trade name an indefinite useful life after considering, among other things, the expected use of the asset, the
expected useful life of other related assets or asset groups, any legal, regulatory, or contractual provisions that may limit the useful life, the Company’s own
historical experience in renewing similar arrangements, the effects of obsolescence, demand and other economic factors, and the maintenance expenditures
required to obtain the expected cash flows. In that analysis, the Company determined that no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other
factors limit the useful lives of these intangible assets.
Goodwill is the result of expected synergies from combining operations of the acquired and acquirer. The goodwill acquired is fully amortizable for tax
purposes.
For the period from the Elgin acquisition date of August 7, 2018 through December 31, 2018, Elgin generated net revenues of $63 million and net income
of $8 million.
Unaudited Pro Forma Information
Merger with Caesars Entertainment Corporation
The following unaudited pro forma financial information is presented to illustrate the estimated effects of the acquisition of Former Caesars as if it had
occurred on January 1, 2019. The pro forma amounts include the historical operating results of the Company and Former Caesars prior to the acquisition,
with adjustments directly attributable to the acquisition. The pro forma results include adjustments and consequential tax effects to reflect incremental
depreciation and amortization expense to be incurred based on preliminary fair values of the identifiable property and equipment and intangible assets
acquired, the incremental interest expense associated with the issuance of debt to finance the acquisition and the adjustments to exclude acquisition related
costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2020 and to recognize these costs during the year ended December 31, 2019 as if incurred on January 1,
2019. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what the consolidated results of operations of the combined company
were, nor does it reflect the expected realization of any synergies or cost savings associated with the acquisition.
(In millions)
Net revenues
Net loss
Net loss attributable to Caesars
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2020
$
5,642 $
(2,738)
(2,670)
10,134
(1,039)
(1,035)
These pro forma results do not necessarily represent the results of operations that would have been achieved if the Merger had taken place on January 1,
2019, nor are they indicative of the results of operations for future periods. The pro forma amounts include the historical operating results of the Company
and Former Caesars prior to the Merger with adjustments directly attributable to the Merger.
Tropicana
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018, as if the
Tropicana Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2017.
92
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(In millions)
Net operating revenues
Net income
Year Ended December
31,
2018
$
2,736
93
These pro forma results do not necessarily represent the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place on January 1,
2017, nor are they indicative of the results of operations for future periods. The pro forma amounts include the historical operating results of the Company
and Tropicana prior to the Tropicana Acquisition with adjustments directly attributable to the Tropicana Acquisition.
Elgin
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018, as if the Elgin
Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2017.
(In millions)
Net operating revenues
Net income
Year Ended December
31,
2018
$
2,153
106
These pro forma results do not necessarily represent the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place on January 1,
2017, nor are they indicative of the results of operations for future periods. The pro forma amounts include the historical operating results of the Company
and Elgin prior to the Elgin Acquisition with adjustments directly attributable to the Elgin Acquisition.
Note 4. Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
The Company periodically divests assets that it does not consider core to its business to raise capital or, in some cases, to comply with conditions, terms,
obligations or restrictions imposed by antitrust, gaming and other regulatory entities. The carrying value of assets that meet the criteria for asset held for
sale are compared to the expected selling price and any expected losses are recorded immediately. Gains or losses associated with the disposal of assets
held for sale are recorded within other operating costs, unless the assets represent a discontinued operation.
Held for sale - Continuing operations
MontBleu, Evansville and Baton Rouge
On April 24, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive purchase agreement with Twin River and certain of its affiliates for the sale of the equity interests
of Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport Joint Venture and Columbia Properties Tahoe, LLC, the entities that hold Eldorado Shreveport and MontBleu,
respectively, for aggregate consideration of $155 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The definitive agreement provides that the
consummation of the sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. Both MontBleu and
Eldorado Shreveport were within the Regional segment. On December 23, 2020, the Company consummated the sale of Eldorado Shreveport to Bally's
Corporation (formerly Twin River) for $140 million resulting in a gain of $29 million. MontBleu is expected to close in the first half of 2021.
MontBleu met the requirements for presentation as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2020, but did not meet the requirements for presentation as
discontinued operations and MontBleu’s results of operations are included in income from continuing operations in the periods presented.
As a result of the agreement to sell MontBleu, an impairment charge totaling $45 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the
carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds. The impairment charges resulted in a reduction to the carrying amounts of the right-of-use
assets, property and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles totaling $18 million, $23 million and $4 million, respectively, recorded in the Regional
segment.
On July 16, 2020, in connection with its review of the Merger, the Indiana Gaming Commission concluded that the Company will need to enter into
agreements to divest of three properties within the state of Indiana in order to avoid undue economic concentration as a condition to their approval of the
Merger. On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Evansville to GLPI and Twin River for $480 million in cash, subject to a
customary working capital adjustment. The sale is
93
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to close in mid-2021. On December 24,
2020, the Company entered into an agreement to divest of the assets of Caesars Southern Indiana. In addition, the Company plans to enter into an
agreement to divest of Horseshoe Hammond prior to December 31, 2021, as the deadline was extended by the Indiana Gaming Commission. Evansville
met the requirements for presentation as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2020, while Caesars Southern Indiana and Horseshoe Hammond met the
requirements for presentation as held for sale and discontinued operations.
On December 1, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with CQ Holding Company, Inc. to sell the equity interests of Baton Rouge. The
definitive agreement provides that the consummation of the sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory
approvals and is expected to close in mid-2021. Baton Rouge met the requirements for presentation as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2020.
As a result of the agreement to sell Baton Rouge, an impairment charge totaling $50 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to
the carrying value exceeding the estimated net sales proceeds. The impairment charges resulted in a reduction to the carrying amounts of the right-of-use
assets, property and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles totaling $1 million, $47 million and $2 million, respectively, recorded in the Regional
segment. See Note 7.
As of December 31, 2020, Korea JV’s assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale. On January 21, 2021, the Company consummated the sale of
Korea JV for less than $1 million.
The assets and liabilities held for sale were as follows as of December 31, 2020:
(In millions)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents, net
Property and equipment, net
Goodwill
Gaming licenses and other intangibles, net
Other assets, net
Assets held for sale
Current liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
MontBleu
Evansville
Baton Rouge
Korea
December 31, 2020
$
$
$
$
3 $
37
—
—
32
72 $
8 $
63
71 $
7 $
302
9
138
49
505 $
12 $
24
36 $
2 $
2
—
—
1
5 $
2 $
1
3 $
The following information presents the net revenues and net (loss) income for the Company’s properties that are held for sale:
(In millions)
Net revenues
Net loss
Held for sale - Sold
MontBleu
$
31 $
(42)
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Evansville
Baton Rouge
Korea
98 $
(5)
15 $
(70)
8
90
—
—
32
130
108
22
130
—
(1)
Presque, Nemacolin, Mountaineer, Caruthersville, Cape Girardeau, Kansas City, Vicksburg and Shreveport Divestitures
The sale of Presque closed on January 11, 2019 resulting in a gain on sale of $22 million, net of final working capital adjustments, for the year ended
December 31, 2019. The sale of Nemacolin closed on March 8, 2019 resulting in a gain of less than $1 million on the sale, net of final working capital
adjustments, for the year ended December 31, 2019. The sales of Mountaineer, Caruthersville and Cape Girardeau were consummated on December 6,
2019, resulting in a gain of $29 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. On July 1, 2020, the Company consummated the sale of the equity interests
of the entities that hold Vicksburg and Kansas City to Twin River for $230 million resulting in a gain of $8 million.
Prior to their respective closing dates, Presque, Nemacolin, Mountaineer, Caruthersville, Cape Girardeau, Kansas City, and Vicksburg met the requirements
for presentation as assets held for sale under generally accepted accounting principles. However, they did not meet the requirements for presentation as
discontinued operations. All properties were previously reported in the Regional segment. As described above, the Company entered into an agreement and
sold Shreveport during the year ended December 31, 2020.
94
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following information presents the net revenues and net (loss) income of properties sold during the year ended December 31, 2020:
(In millions)
Net revenues
Net (loss) income
Kansas City
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Vicksburg
Shreveport
$
18 $
3
7 $
(1)
68
12
The following information presents the net revenues and net (loss) income of held for sale properties for the year ended December 31, 2019:
(In millions)
Net revenues
Net (loss) income
Presque
Nemacolin
Mountaineer
Cape
Girardeau
Caruthersville
Kansas City
Vicksburg
Year Ended December 31, 2019
$
3 $
—
5 $
(1)
118 $
11
54 $
8
33 $
5
63 $
11
The following information presents the net revenues and net (loss) income of held for sale properties for the year ended December 31, 2018:
(In millions)
Net revenues
Net income (loss)
The assets and liabilities held for sale were as follows as of December 31, 2019:
(In millions)
Assets:
Property and equipment, net
Goodwill
Gaming licenses and other intangibles, net
Other assets, net
Assets held for sale
Current liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
Held for sale - Discontinued operations
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Presque
Nemacolin
140 $
14
December 31, 2019
Kansas City
Vicksburg
39 $
40
91
36
206 $
3 $
33
36 $
$
$
$
$
$
21
(1)
33
(4)
31
9
3
4
47
2
—
2
As result of the Merger, certain Former Caesars properties, including Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, Caesars Southern Indiana, Horseshoe Hammond, Harrah’s
Reno, Caesars UK group, including Emerald Resorts & Casino, and Bally’s Atlantic City (“Bally’s AC”) met held for sale criteria as of the date of the
closing of the Merger. The sales of these properties have or are expected to close within one year from the date of the closing of the Merger and the
properties are classified as discontinued operations. Caesars UK group, including Emerald Resorts & Casino, is within the Managed, International, CIE
segment while all other discontinued operations are in the Regional segment.
On September 3, 2020, the Company and VICI entered into an agreement to sell Harrah’s Louisiana Downs Casino, Racing & Entertainment (“Harrah’s
Louisiana Downs”) with Rubico Acquisition Corp. for $22 million, subject to a customary working capital adjustment, where the proceeds will be split
between the Company and VICI. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is
expected to close in the first half of 2021.
On September 30, 2020, the Company and VICI completed the sale of Harrah’s Reno for $42 million. The proceeds from the sale were split between the
Company and VICI, and the Company received $8 million of net proceeds.
On November 18, 2020, the Company and VICI completed the sale of Bally's AC to Bally’s Corporation for $25 million. The proceeds from the sale were
split between the Company and VICI, and the Company received $5 million of net proceeds. As a result of the sale, Caesars agreed to reimburse Bally’s
Corporation $30 million for capital expenditures required at Bally’s
95
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Atlantic City and recorded a liability within Accrued other liabilities and a charge to Discontinued operations, net of income taxes. Our commitment will be
satisfied by adjusting obligations under certain sportsbook operating agreements between Bally’s Corporation and the Company following our expected
acquisition of William Hill.
On December 24, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana to the EBCI for $250 million, subject to customary
purchase price adjustments. The sale is subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals and is expected to
close in the third quarter of 2021.
The following information presents the net revenues and net (loss) income for the Company’s properties that are part of discontinued operations for the
year ended December 31, 2020:
(In millions)
Net revenues
Net (loss) income
Horseshoe
Hammond
Caesars UK
$
154 $
26
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Harrah’s
Louisiana Downs Harrah’s Reno
19 $
5
— $
(5)
23 $
5
Bally’s AC
Caesars
Southern
Indiana
45 $
(37)
88
4
The assets and liabilities held for sale as a discontinued operation were as follows as of December 31, 2020:
(In millions)
Assets:
Cash
Property and equipment, net
Goodwill
Gaming licenses and other intangibles, net
Other assets, net
Assets held for sale
Current liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
(a)
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
Horseshoe
Hammond
Caesars UK
Harrah’s Louisiana
Downs
Caesars Southern
Indiana
December 31, 2020
$
$
$
$
18 $
402
141
30
38
629 $
26 $
72
98 $
32 $
75
3
28
117
255 $
73 $
120
193 $
6 $
11
3
5
—
25 $
6 $
6
12 $
8
418
136
23
4
589
13
332
345
____________________
(a)
We have included $336 million of deferred finance obligation as held for sale liabilities for Caesars Southern Indiana and Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, which represent our preliminary
purchase price allocation of the liability which will be derecognized upon completion of those divestitures. We have not included any portion of the deferred finance obligation associated
with Horseshoe Hammond as held for sale as we do not yet have any sale agreements in place or know the effect of any possible master lease modification on our deferred finance lease
liability.
Note 5. Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliates
William Hill
The Company entered into a 25-year agreement, which became effective January 29, 2019, with William Hill, which granted to William Hill the right to
conduct betting activities, including operating our sportsbooks, in retail channels under certain skins for online channels with respect to the Company’s
current and future properties, and conduct certain real money online gaming activities. The Company received a 20% ownership interest in William Hill
US, as well as 13 million ordinary shares of William Hill plc, which carry certain time restrictions on when they can be sold. Additionally, the Company
receives a profit share from the operations of sports betting and other gaming activities associated with the Company’s properties. “Skin” in the context of
this agreement refers to the Company’s ability to grant to William Hill an online channel that allows William Hill to operate online casino and sports
gaming activities in reliance on, and utilizing the benefit of, any licenses granted to the Company or its subsidiaries.
On September 30, 2020, the Company announced its intention to acquire William Hill plc in an all-cash transaction. See Note 1.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s receivable from William Hill totaled $7 million and $4 million, respectively, and is reflected in Due
from affiliates on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company is accounting for its investment in William Hill US under the equity method. The fair value of the Company’s initial investment in William
Hill US of $129 million at January 29, 2019 was determined using Level 3 inputs. As of
96
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2020 and 2019, the carrying value of the Company’s interest in William Hill US totaled $128 million and $127 million, respectively, and is
recorded in Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company is accounting for its investment in William Hill plc as an investment in equity securities. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair value
of the William Hill plc shares totaled $44 million and $29 million, respectively, net of cumulative unrealized gains of $17 million and $2 million,
respectively, and is included in Other assets, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recorded unrealized gains of $15 million and
$2 million during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 8.
As described above, the Company granted William Hill the right to the use of certain skins to operate online sports betting operations through our market
access in each state and operate retail sports betting in our current and future properties for an equity method investment. The fair value of the William Hill
US and William Hill plc shares received have been deferred and are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the 25-year agreement term. The
Company recognized revenue of $8 million and $5 million during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and is recorded in Other
revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the balance of the William Hill deferred revenue totaled
$134 million and $142 million, respectively, and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Note 6. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, except for assets acquired in our business combinations which were adjusted for fair value under ASC 805.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset as noted in the table below, or the term of the lease,
whichever is less. Costs of major improvements are capitalized, while costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Gains or
losses on the disposal of property and equipment are included in operating income.
Our property and equipment is subject to various operating leases for which we are the lessor. We lease our property and equipment related to our hotel
rooms, convention space and retail space through various short-term and long-term operating leases. See Note 10 for further discussion of our leases.
Buildings and improvements
Land improvements
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
Riverboats
3 to 40 years
12 to 40 years
3 to 15 years
30 years
The Company evaluates its property and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment based on its classification as held for sale or to be held and
used. Several criteria must be met before an asset is classified as held for sale, including that management with the appropriate authority commits to a plan
to sell the asset at a reasonable price in relation to its fair value and is actively seeking a buyer. For assets held for sale, the Company recognizes the asset at
the lower of carrying value or fair market value less costs to sell, as estimated based on comparable asset sales, offers received, or a discounted cash flow
model. For assets to be held and used, the Company reviews for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. The Company then compares the
estimated future cash flows of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying
value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then an impairment charge may be recorded for any
difference between fair value and the carrying value. All recognized impairment losses, whether for assets held for sale or assets to be held and used, are
recorded as operating expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2018, an impairment charge of $4 million was recorded related to the property and
equipment held for sale at Nemacolin. For the year ended December 31, 2019, an impairment charge totaling $1 million was recorded related to non-
operating real property located in Pennsylvania. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a tangible asset impairment of $4 million related
to the sale of corporate airplane. See Note 4 for further discussion of impairment on assets held for sale.
97
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Property and Equipment, Net
(In millions)
Land
Buildings, riverboats, and leasehold and land improvements
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
Construction in progress
Total property and equipment
Less: accumulated depreciation
Total property and equipment, net
Depreciation Expense
(In millions)
Depreciation expense
As of December 31,
2020
2019
$
$
2,174 $
11,686
1,404
118
15,382
(1,049)
14,333 $
652
1,973
625
31
3,281
(666)
2,615
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
527 $
191 $
145
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the related lease.
Note 7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net
The purchase price of an acquisition is allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date
of acquisition. The Company determines the estimated fair values after review and consideration of relevant information including discounted cash flows,
quoted market prices, and estimates made by management. To the extent the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, such excess is recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets must be reviewed for impairment at least annually and between annual test dates in certain circumstances.
The Company performs its annual impairment tests as of October 1 of each fiscal year. The Company performs this assessment more frequently if
impairment indicators exist. The Company performed the annual goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit with its
carrying amount. The Company determines the estimated fair value of each reporting unit based on a combination of EBITDA, valuation multiples, and
estimated future cash flows discounted at rates commensurate with the capital structure and cost of capital of comparable market participants, giving
appropriate consideration to the prevailing borrowing rates within the casino industry in general. The Company also evaluates the aggregate fair value of all
of its reporting units and other non-operating assets in comparison to its aggregate debt and equity market capitalization at the test date. EBITDA multiples
and discounted cash flows are common measures used to value businesses in the industry.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of trademarks and expenditures associated with obtaining racing and gaming licenses. Indefinite-lived
intangible assets are not subject to amortization but are subject to an annual impairment test. If the carrying amount of an indefinite-lived intangible asset
exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess amount.
Gaming rights represent intangible assets acquired from the purchase of a gaming entity located in a gaming jurisdiction where competition is limited, such
as when only a limited number of gaming operators are allowed to operate in the jurisdiction. These gaming license rights are not subject to amortization as
the Company has determined that they have indefinite useful lives. For gaming jurisdictions with high barriers of renewal of the gaming rights, such as
material costs of renewal, the gaming rights are deemed to have a finite useful life and are amortized over the expected useful life.
Finite-lived intangible assets consist of trade names and customer relationships acquired in business combinations. Amortization is recorded using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. The Company evaluates for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. When
indicators are noted, the Company then compares estimated future cash flows, undiscounted, to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash
flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is recorded.
98
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Changes in Carrying Value of Goodwill by Segment
(In millions)
Gross Goodwill
Balance as of January 1, 2019
Divestitures
Transferred to assets held for sale
Other
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Accumulated Impairment
Balance as of January 1, 2019
Transferred to assets held for sale
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Net carrying value, as of December 31, 2019
Gross Goodwill
Balance as of January 1, 2020
Transferred to assets held for sale (see Note 4)
Acquired
Balance as of December 31, 2020
(a)
Accumulated Impairment
Balance as of January 1, 2020
Impairment
Transferred to assets held for sale
Balance as of December 31, 2020
Net carrying value, as of December 31, 2020
(b)
Las Vegas
Regional
Managed,
International, CIE
CEI Total
$
$
$
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
— $
—
6,873
6,873
—
—
—
—
6,873 $
1,053 $
(41)
(81)
(9)
922
(45)
33
(12)
910 $
922 $
(17)
1,999
2,904
(12)
(100)
8
(104)
2,800 $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
— $
—
50
50
—
—
—
—
50 $
1,053
(41)
(81)
(9)
922
(45)
33
(12)
910
922
(17)
8,922
9,827
(12)
(100)
8
(104)
9,723
____________________
(a)
(b)
Includes goodwill acquired upon Merger. See Note 3 for further detail.
$281 million of goodwill within our Regional segment is associated with reporting units with zero or negative carrying value.
Changes in Carrying Value of Intangible Assets Other than Goodwill
(In millions)
Balance as of January 1
Impairment
Amortization expense
Transferred to assets held for sale (see Note 4)
Acquired
(a)
Balance as of December 31
Amortizing
Non-Amortizing
Total
2020
2019
2020
2019
2020
2019
$
$
53 $
—
(56)
(5)
487
479 $
83 $
—
(30)
—
—
53 $
1,058 $
(22)
—
(174)
2,912
3,774 $
1,278 $
—
—
(220)
—
1,058 $
1,111 $
(22)
(56)
(179)
3,399
4,253 $
1,361
—
(30)
(220)
—
1,111
____________________
(a)
Includes intangible assets acquired upon Merger and $35 million of acquisition of gaming rights. See Note 3 and Note 11 for further detail.
During 2020, the Company recognized impairment charges in our Regional segment related to goodwill and trade names totaling $100 million and
$16 million, respectively, due to declines in recent performance and the expected impact on future cash flows as a result of COVID-19.
For 2019, no reporting units were noted to have a carrying value in excess of fair value. As a result, no impairments were indicated as a result of this testing
for goodwill.
When assets are deemed to be held for sale, any associated intangible assets, including goodwill, are reclassified to Assets held for sale on our balance
sheets (see Note 4).
We used the Excess Earnings Method and a Cost Approach for estimating fair value for these gaming rights. We utilized an income approach using a
discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of our goodwill.
99
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Gross Carrying Value and Accumulated Amortization of Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill
(Dollars in millions)
Amortizing intangible assets
Customer relationships
Gaming rights and others
Non-amortizing intangible assets
Trademarks
Gaming rights
Caesars Rewards
December 31, 2020
Useful Life
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Carrying
Amount
Gross Carrying
Amount
December 31, 2019
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Carrying
Amount
3 - 7 years
34 years
$
$
488 $
84
572 $
(92) $
(1)
(93)
396 $
83
479 $
101 $
—
101 $
(48) $
—
(48)
2,161
1,090
523
3,774
4,253
$
53
—
53
165
893
—
1,058
1,111
Total amortizing and non-amortizing intangible assets, net
$
Amortization expense with respect to intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 totaled $56 million, $30 million and $13
million, respectively, which is included in depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Estimated Five-Year Amortization
(In millions)
Estimated annual amortization expense
Note 8. Fair Value Measurements
2021
2022
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2024
2025
$
77 $
64 $
60 $
60 $
60
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis: The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by
input level, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020 and 2019:
(In millions)
Assets:
Restricted cash and investments
Marketable securities
Derivative instruments - FX forward
Total assets at fair value
Liabilities:
Derivative instruments - 5% Convertible Notes
Derivative instruments - interest rate swaps
Total liabilities at fair value
(In millions)
Assets:
Restricted cash and investments
Marketable securities
Total assets at fair value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
December 31, 2020
1 $
23
—
24 $
—
—
— $
3 $
10
40
53 $
326
90
416 $
44 $
—
—
44 $
—
—
— $
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
December 31, 2019
11 $
27
38 $
2 $
8
10 $
29 $
—
29 $
48
33
40
121
326
90
416
42
35
77
$
$
$
$
$
100
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The change in restricted investments valued using Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:
(In millions)
Fair value of investment and liabilities at December 31, 2018
Non-cash consideration
Released from restrictions
Unrealized gain (loss)
Fair value of investment and liabilities at December 31, 2019
Value of additional investment received
Released from restrictions
Unrealized gain
Fair value at December 31, 2020
Restricted Cash and Investments
Level 3 Investment
$
Level 3 Other
Liabilities
—
(9)
13
(4)
—
2
(4)
2
—
16 $
27
(26)
12
29
5
(8)
18
44 $
$
The estimated fair values of the Company’s restricted cash and investments are based upon quoted prices available in active markets (Level 1), or quoted
prices for similar assets in active and inactive markets (Level 2), or quoted prices available in active markets adjusted for time restrictions related to the sale
of the investment (Level 3) and represent the amounts the Company would expect to receive if the Company sold the restricted cash and investments.
Restricted cash classified as Level 1 includes cash held in short-term certificate of deposit accounts or money market type funds. Restricted investments
include shares acquired in conjunction with the Company’s sports betting agreements that contain restrictions related to the ability to liquidate shares within
a specified timeframe.
In November 2018, the Company entered into a 20-year agreement with The Stars Group Inc. (“TSG”) to provide TSG with options to obtain access to a
second skin for online sports wagering and third skin for real money online gaming and poker with respect to the Company’s properties in the United
States. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received 1 million TSG common shares as a revenue share from the operation of the applicable
verticals by TSG under the Company’s licenses. The fair value of the shares received has been deferred and is recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis
over the 20-year agreement term. All shares are subject to a one year restriction on transfer from the date they are received. On May 5, 2020, Flutter
Entertainment PLC (“Flutter”) completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of TSG in exchange for 0.2253 Flutter shares
per common share of TSG.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair value of unrestricted shares totaled $10 million and $14 million, respectively, net of cumulative unrealized
gains of $5 million and $4 million, respectively, and is included in Prepayments and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company
recorded unrealized gains of $14 million and $1 million during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which are included in Other
(loss) income on the Statement of Operations. In December 2020, the Company sold 121,285 shares for net proceeds of approximately $24 million.
As noted above, the restriction on the Flutter shares expired in December 2020. As such, the shares were transferred from a Level 3 investment to a Level 1
investment. There were no other transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 investments.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities consist primarily of trading securities held by the Company’s captive insurance subsidiary and unrestricted shares acquired in
conjunction with the Company’s sports betting agreements. These investments also include collateral for several escrow and trust agreements with third-
party beneficiaries. The estimated fair values of the Company’s marketable securities are determined on an individual asset basis based upon quoted prices
of identical assets available in active markets (Level 1), quoted prices of identical assets in inactive markets, or quoted prices for similar assets in active and
inactive markets (Level 2), and represent the amounts the Company would expect to receive if the Company sold these marketable securities.
Derivative Instruments
The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
5% Convertible Notes - Derivative Liability
On October 6, 2017, Former Caesars issued $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of 5% Convertible Notes.
101
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The 5% Convertible Notes are convertible into the weighted average of the number of shares of Company Common Stock and amount of cash actually
received per share by holders of common stock of Former Caesars that made elections for consideration in the Merger. As a result, the 5% Convertible
Notes are convertible into a number of shares of Company Common Stock that is equal to approximately 0.014 shares of Company Common Stock and
$1.17 of cash per $1.00 principal amount of 5% Convertible Notes. The 5% Convertible Notes are convertible at any time at the option of the holders
thereof or the Company. We do not intend to exercise our option to convert these notes prior to maturity. As of December 31, 2020, approximately
$770 million of the 5% Convertible Notes have been converted into cash and shares resulting in a net gain of $16 million which is recorded within other
(loss) income on the Statement of Operations.
The outstanding balance of $325 million, of which $10 million was held in trust as of December 31, 2020, would result in the issuance of an aggregate
of 4.5 million shares of Company Common Stock and payment of $379 million upon conversion of the remaining outstanding 5% Convertible Notes. As
of December 31, 2020, the estimated remaining life of the 5% Convertible Notes is approximately 3.8 years.
Management analyzed the conversion features for derivative accounting consideration under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, (“ASC 815”) and
determined that the 5% Convertible Notes contain bifurcated derivative features and qualify for derivative accounting. In accordance with ASC 815, the
Company has bifurcated the conversion features of the 5% Convertible Notes and recorded a derivative liability. The 5% Convertible Notes derivative
features are not designated as hedging instruments. The derivative features of the 5% Convertible Notes are carried on the Company’s Balance Sheet at fair
value in Other long-term liabilities. The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and the changes in fair value as a result of
fluctuations in the share price of our common stock resulted in a loss of $111 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was recorded as a
component of Other (loss) income in the Statement of Operations. The derivative liability associated with the 5% Convertible Notes will remain in effect
until such time as the underlying convertible notes are exercised or terminated and the resulting derivative liability will be reclassified from a liability to
equity as of such date.
Valuation Methodology
The 5% Convertible Notes had an initial face value of $1.1 billion, an initial term of seven years, and a coupon rate of 5%.
As of December 31, 2020 we estimated the fair value of the 5% Convertible Notes using a market-based approach that incorporated the value of both the
straight debt and conversion features of the 5% Convertible Notes. The valuation model incorporated actively traded prices of the 5% Convertible Notes as
of the reporting date, and assumptions regarding the incremental cost of borrowing for CEI. The key assumption used in the valuation model is the actively
traded price of 5% Convertible Notes and the incremental cost of borrowing is an indirectly observable input. The fair value for the conversion features of
the 5% Convertible Notes is classified as Level 2 measurement.
Key Assumptions as of December 31, 2020:
• Actively traded price of 5% Convertible Notes - $207.00
•
Incremental cost of borrowing - 4.0%
Forward contracts
In relation to the proposed acquisition of William Hill plc, on September 28, 2020, the Company entered into a foreign exchange forward contract to hedge
the risk of appreciation of the GBP denominated purchase price. Under the agreement, the Company agreed to purchase £1.3 billion at a contracted
exchange rate, however, on October 1, 2020 the contract was cancelled without being executed. In addition, on October 9, 2020, the Company entered into
a separate foreign exchange forward contract to purchase £536 million at a contracted exchange rate. As of December 31, 2020, the forward contract was
valued at $40 million and was recorded in Other long-term assets. A corresponding unrealized gain of $40 million related to the change in fair value was
recorded in the Other (loss) income in the Statement of Operations. The fair value of the forward contract is classified as Level 2 measurement as the value
has been determined using quoted prices for similar assets in an active market.
Interest Rate Swap Derivatives
We assumed Former Caesars interest rate swaps to manage the mix of assumed debt between fixed and variable rate instruments. As of December 31, 2020,
we have seven interest rate swap agreements to fix the interest rate on $2.3 billion of variable rate debt related to the CRC Credit Agreement. The interest
rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedging instruments. The difference to be paid or received under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements is
accrued as interest rates change and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense at settlement. Changes in the variable interest rates to be received
pursuant to the terms of the interest rate swap agreements will have a corresponding effect on future cash flows.
102
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The major terms of the interest rate swap agreements as of December 31, 2020 were as follows:
Effective Date
1/1/2019
1/1/2019
1/1/2019
1/1/2019
1/1/2019
1/1/2019
1/2/2019
Valuation Methodology
Notional Amount
(In millions)
250
250
400
200
200
600
400
Fixed Rate Paid
2.196%
2.274%
2.788%
2.828%
2.828%
2.739%
2.707%
Variable Rate Received as of
December 31, 2020
0.14675%
0.14675%
0.1455%
0.14675%
0.14675%
0.14675%
0.14675%
Maturity Date
12/31/2021
12/31/2022
12/31/2021
12/31/2022
12/31/2022
12/31/2022
12/31/2021
The estimated fair values of our interest rate swap derivative instruments are derived from market prices obtained from dealer quotes for similar, but not
identical, assets or liabilities. Such quotes represent the estimated amounts we would receive or pay to terminate the contracts. The interest rate swap
derivative instruments are included in either Deferred charges and other assets or Deferred credits and other liabilities on our Balance Sheets. Our
derivatives are recorded at their fair values, adjusted for the credit rating of the counterparty if the derivative is an asset, or adjusted for the credit rating of
the Company if the derivative is a liability. None of our derivative instruments are offset and all were classified as Level 2.
Financial Statement Effect
The effect of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments on the Balance Sheet for amounts transferred into Accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss) (“AOCI”) before tax was a gain of $34 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. AOCI reclassified to Interest
expense on the Statements of Operations was $31 million for year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the interest rate swaps derivative
liability of $90 million was recorded in Other long-term liabilities. Net settlement of these interest rate swaps results in the reclassification of deferred gains
and losses within AOCI to be reclassified to the income statement as a component of interest expense as settlements occur. The estimated amount of
existing gains or losses that are reported in AOCI at the reporting date that are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is
approximately $58 million.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The changes in AOCI by component, net of tax, for the period through December 31, 2020 are shown below.
(In millions)
Balances as of December 31, 2019
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax
Balances as of December 31, 2020
Unrealized Net Gains
on Derivative
Instruments
Foreign Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Total
$
$
— $
(5)
31
26
26 $
— $
8
—
8
8 $
—
3
31
34
34
103
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 9. Accrued Other Liabilities
Accrued other liabilities consisted of the following:
(In millions)
Contract and contract related liabilities (See Note 13)
Accrued payroll and other related liabilities
Self-Insurance claims and reserves (See Note 11)
Accrued taxes
Operating lease liability
Disputed claims liability
Exit cost accrual
Other accruals
Total accrued other liabilities
Disputed Claims Liability and Exit Cost Accrual
December 31,
2020
2019
$
251 $
178
223
159
52
51
28
297
$
1,239 $
32
41
35
67
20
—
—
112
307
The disputed claims liability and exit cost accrual were assumed liabilities of Former Caesars. The disputed claims liability represents certain remaining
unsecured claims related to Former Caesars bankruptcy for which we have estimated the fair value of the remaining liability. Exit costs are related to the
unbundling of electric service provided by NV Energy and an Iowa greyhound pari-mutuel racing fund which we assumed from the Merger and other
system contracts.
Note 10. Leases
The Company has operating and finance leases for various real estate and equipment. Certain of the Company’s lease agreements include rental payments
based on a percentage of sales over specified contractual amounts, rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation and rental payments based on usage.
The Company’s leases include options to extend the lease term one month to 60 years. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material
restrictive covenants, other than those described below.
Lessee Arrangements
Operating Leases
We lease real estate and equipment used in our operations from third parties. As of December 31, 2020, the remaining term of our operating leases ranged
from 1 to 71 years with various extension options available, if we elect to exercise them. However, our remaining terms only include extension options that
we have determined are reasonably certain as of December 31, 2020. In addition to minimum rental commitments, certain of our operating leases provide
for contingent rentals based on a percentage of revenues in excess of specified amounts. We do not include costs associated with our non-lease components
in our lease costs disclosed in the table below. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we obtained $38 million of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets in
exchange for new lease liabilities.
Leases recorded on the balance sheet consist of the following:
(In millions)
ASSETS
Classification on the Balance Sheet
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
Operating lease ROU assets
(a)
Other assets, net
$
LIABILITIES
Current operating lease liabilities
Non-current operating lease liabilities
(a)
(a)
Accrued other liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
424 $
52
445
188
20
177
___________________
(a)
As noted above, we have elected the short-term lease measurement and recognition exemption and do not establish ROU assets or liabilities for operating leases with terms of 12 months or
less.
Other information related to lease terms and discount rates are as follows:
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term
Weighted Average Discount Rate
December 31, 2020
24.3 years
8.3%
December 31, 2019
34.0 years
7.2%
104
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The components of lease expense are as follows:
(In millions)
Operating lease expense
Short-term and variable lease expense
Total operating lease costs
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases is as follows:
(In millions)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows for operating leases
Maturities of lease liabilities are summarized as follows:
(In millions)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Thereafter
Total future minimum lease payments
Less: present value factor
Total lease liability
Finance Leases
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2020
51 $
49
100 $
20
42
62
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2020
46 $
24
$
$
$
Operating Leases
85
76
71
37
35
1,272
1,576
(1,079)
497
$
$
We have finance leases for certain equipment and real estate. As of December 31, 2020, our finance leases had remaining lease terms of up to
approximately 38 years, some of which include options to extend the lease terms in one month increments. Our finance lease ROU assets and liabilities
were $64 million as of December 31, 2020.
Financing Obligations
VICI Leases & Golf Course Use Agreement
Upon consummation of the Merger, CEI assumed obligations of certain real property assets leased from VICI by Former Caesars under the following
agreements: (i) for a portfolio of properties at various locations throughout the United States (the “Non-CPLV lease”), (ii) for Caesars Palace Las Vegas
(the “CPLV lease”), (iii) for Harrah’s Joliet Hotel & Casino (the “Joliet Lease”) and (iv) for Harrah’s Las Vegas (the “HLV Lease”). These lease agreements
provided for annual fixed rent (subject to escalation) of $773 million during an initial period, then rent consisting of both base rent and variable rent
elements. The lease agreements had a 15-year initial term and four five-year renewal options. The lease agreements included escalation provisions
beginning in year two of the initial term and continuing through the renewal terms. The lease agreements also included provisions for variable rent
payments calculated, in part, based on increases or decreases of net revenue of the underlying lease properties, commencing in year eight of the initial term
and continuing through the renewal terms. The fair value of the real estate assets and the related failed sale-leaseback financing obligations were estimated
based on the present value of the estimated future lease payments over the lease term of 15 years, plus renewal options, using an imputed discount rate of
approximately 11.25%.
In connection with the closing of the Merger on July 20, 2020, the Company and certain of its affiliates consummated a series of transactions with VICI in
accordance with the MTA and the purchase and sales agreements entered on September 26, 2019. The Company and certain of its affiliates consummated
sale-leaseback transactions related to Harrah’s New Orleans, Harrah’s Laughlin and Harrah’s Resort Atlantic City, including the Harrah’s Atlantic City
Waterfront Conference Center, for approximately $1.8 billion of net proceeds. The Non-CPLV lease was amended to include these properties (as amended,
the “Regional Lease”), and was further amended to increase the annual rent thereunder by $154 million in the aggregate related to such added properties
and extend the term of such lease so that following the amendment of such lease there will be 15 years remaining until the expiration of the initial term.
The Joliet Lease term was also amended such that 15 years remain until the expiration of the initial term.
105
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Former Caesars entered into a Golf Course Use Agreement with VICI, which has a 35-year term (inclusive of all renewal periods), pursuant to which such
affiliates of the Company agreed to pay (i) an annual payment of $10 million, subject to escalation, (ii) an annual use fee of $3 million, subject to escalation
beginning in the second year, and (iii) certain per-round fees, all as more particularly set forth in the Golf Course Use Agreement. Furthermore, the term of
the Golf Course Use Agreement was extended such that there will be 15 years remaining until the expiration of the initial term.
The amendment to the Regional Lease also contains a put-call agreement related to the Centaur properties, which are Hoosier Park and Indiana Grand,
pursuant to which the Company may require VICI to purchase and lease back (as lessor) the real estate components of the gaming and racetrack facilities of
Hoosier Park and Indiana Grand and VICI may require the Company to sell to VICI and lease back (as lessee) the real estate components of such gaming
and racetrack facilities. Election by either party to put or call the Centaur properties must be made during the election period beginning January 1, 2022 and
ending December 31, 2024. Upon either party exercising their option, the Centaur properties would be sold at the price in accordance with the agreement
and subsequently leased back to CEI by adding the leaseback to the pre-existing Regional lease agreement. As such, the Centaur properties would be leased
back over the remaining term of the Regional lease agreement and the Regional lease agreement annual rental payments would be increased by the amount
of rent required to achieve a rent coverage ratio of 1.3 as of the exercise date. A liability of $6 million associated with this agreement has been recorded
within Other long-term liabilities.
Additionally, in connection with the Merger, the Company received a one-time payment from VICI of approximately $1.4 billion for amendments to the
CPLV Lease (as amended, the “Las Vegas Lease”) to, among other things, (i) add the land and improvements of HLV to the lease and terminate the HLV
Lease, (ii) add the rent payable with respect to the HLV Lease and further increase the annual rent payable with respect to HLV by approximately
$15 million, (iii) increase the annual rent with respect to CPLV by approximately $84 million and (iv) extend the term of such lease so that following the
amendment of such lease there will be 15 years remaining until the expiration of the initial term. In connection with this modification of the CPLV Lease,
the land and building components subject to the lease amendments described above did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. The modifications to the
VICI Leases described above were accounted for as post-combination debt modifications.
On December 24, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Caesars Southern Indiana to the EBCI for $250 million, subject to a customary
working capital adjustment. As a result of this transaction, Caesars’ annual payments to VICI Properties under the Regional Lease will decline by
$33 million upon closing of the transaction, and variable rent under the lease shall exclude net revenue attributable to Caesars Southern Indiana.
GLPI Leases
The fair value of the real estate assets and the related failed sale-leaseback financing obligations were estimated based on the present value of the estimated
future lease payments over the lease term of 35 years, including renewal options, using an imputed discount rate of approximately 9.75%. The value of the
failed sale-leaseback financing obligations is dependent upon assumptions regarding the amount of the lease payments and the estimated discount rate of
the lease payments required by a market participant.
The GLPI Master Lease provides for the lease of land, buildings, structures and other improvements on the land (including barges and riverboats),
easements and similar appurtenances to the land and improvements relating to the operation of the leased properties. The GLPI Master Lease provides for
an initial term of 20 years (as amended below) with no purchase option. At the Company’s option, the GLPI Master Lease may be extended for up to four
five-year renewal terms beyond the initial 20-year term (as amended below).
On June 15, 2020, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Master Lease with GLPI, which, among other things, (i) extended the initial term
from 15 to 20 years (through September 2038), with four five-year renewals at the Company’s option, (ii) commencing October 1, 2020, removed the
percentage rent payable in exchange for an increase to the non-escalating portion of land base rent to $24 million, (iii) amended the dates on which, and the
amounts by which, the escalating portion of base rent escalates, and (iv) provided certain relief under the operating, capital expenditure and financial
covenants in the event of facility closures due to public health emergencies, governmental restrictions and certain other instances of unavoidable delay. The
amendment to the GLPI Master Lease became effective on July 17, 2020 following receipt of required regulatory approvals. If the Company elects to
renew the term of the GLPI Master Lease, the renewal will be effective as to all, but not less than all, of the leased property then subject to the GLPI Master
Lease. The GLPI Master Lease does not provide the Company with the option to purchase the leased property and the Company does not have the ability to
terminate its obligations under the GLPI Master Lease prior to its expiration without GLPI’s consent.
On June 24, 2020, the Company received approval from Missouri Gaming Commission to sell the real estate underlying Lumière to GLPI and leaseback
the property under a long-term financing obligation. On September 29, 2020, the sale was
106
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
consummated, resulting in satisfaction in full of the Lumière loan, and the Company entered into a lease with respect to the Lumière real estate (the
“Lumière Lease”) with an initial term that ends on October 31, 2033 and four five-year renewal options. As of December 31, 2020, the Lumière loan in
amount of $246 million has been satisfied in full and the real estate has been refinanced under a financing obligation.
On October 27, 2020, the Company’s Exchanging Subsidiaries entered into an Exchange Agreement with GLPI pursuant to which the Exchanging
Subsidiaries agreed to transfer the real estate relating to the Isle Casino Bettendorf and Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo to GLPI in exchange for the real estate
relating to Evansville. The exchange transaction closed on December 18, 2020 and as a result of the lease being classified as a finance obligation the
exchange was accounted for as a debt modification. As a result of the exchange, the real estate relating to Evansville was removed from the GLPI Master
Lease and the real estate relating to Isle Casino Bettendorf and Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo is now subject to the GLPI Master Lease.
Following the amendments and transactions above, the land and building components subject to the lease amendments described above did not qualify for
sale-leaseback accounting and are accounted for as debt modifications.
For these failed sale-leaseback transactions, the Company continues to reflect the real estate assets on the Balance Sheets in Property and equipment, net as
if the Company was the legal owner, and continues to recognize depreciation expense over their estimated useful lives.
The future minimum payments related to the GLPI Leases, including the Lumière Lease, and VICI Leases financing obligation, as amended, at
December 31, 2020 were as follows:
(In millions)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Thereafter
Total future payments
Less: Amounts representing interest
Plus: Residual values
Financing obligation
GLPI Leases
VICI Leases
109 $
110
111
112
114
4,789
5,345
(4,355)
241
1,231 $
961
1,066
1,087
1,107
1,122
44,223
49,566
(39,459)
897
11,004
$
$
Cash payments made relating to our long-term financing obligations during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:
(In millions)
Cash paid for principal
Cash paid for interest
(a)
GLPI Leases
December 31,
(a)
VICI Leases
December 31,
2020
2019
2020
2019
$
— $
93
— $
88
49 $
472
—
—
____________________
(a)
For the initial periods of the GLPI and VICI Leases, cash payments are less than the interest expense recognized, which causes the failed-sale leaseback obligation to increase during the
initial years of the lease term.
Lease Covenants
The GLPI Leases and VICI Leases contains certain operating, capital expenditure and financial covenants thereunder, and the Company’s ability to
maintain compliance with these covenants was also negatively impacted by the COVID-19 public health emergency. On June 15, 2020, the Company
entered into an amendment to the GLPI Master Lease which provides certain relief under these covenants in the event of facility closures due to public
health emergencies, governmental restrictions and certain other instances of unavoidable delay. Furthermore, the Company obtained waivers from VICI
with relation to annual capital expenditure requirements for 2020.
107
Lessor Arrangements
Lodging Arrangements
Lodging arrangements are considered short-term and generally consist of lease and nonlease components. The lease component is the predominant
component of the arrangement and consists of the fees charged for lodging. The nonlease components primarily consist of resort fees and other
miscellaneous items. As the timing and pattern of transfer of both the lease and nonlease components are over the course of the lease term, we have elected
to combine the revenue generated from lease and nonlease components into a single lease component based on the predominant component in the
arrangement. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized approximately $450 million in lease revenue related to lodging arrangements,
which is included in Hotel revenues in the Statement of Operations.
Conventions
Convention arrangements are considered short-term and generally consist of lease and nonlease components. The lease component is the predominant
component of the arrangement and consists of fees charged for the use of meeting space. The nonlease components primarily consist of food and beverage
and audio/visual services. Revenue from conventions is included in Other revenue in the Statement of Operations, and during the year ended December 31,
2020, we recognized approximately $3 million in lease revenue related to conventions.
Real Estate Operating Leases
We enter into long-term real estate leasing arrangements with third-party lessees at our properties. As of December 31, 2020, the remaining terms of these
operating leases ranged from 1 to 85 years, some of which include options to extend the lease term for up to five years. In addition to minimum rental
commitments, certain of our operating leases provide for contingent payments including contingent rentals based on a percentage of revenues in excess of
specified amounts and reimbursements for common area maintenance and utilities charges. As the timing and pattern of transfer of both the lease and
nonlease components are over the course of the lease term, we have elected to combine the revenue generated from lease and nonlease components into a
single lease component based on the predominant component in the arrangement. In addition, to maintain the value of our leased assets, certain leases
include specific maintenance requirements of the lessees or maintenance is performed by the Company on behalf of the lessees. During the year ended
December 31, 2020, we recognized approximately $41 million of real estate lease revenue, which is included in Other revenue in the Statement of
Operations. Real estate lease revenue includes $13 million of variable rental income for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Maturity of Lease Receivables as of December 31, 2020
(In millions)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Thereafter
Total
Note 11. Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
Operating Leases
50
50
47
41
37
719
944
$
$
We are party to various legal proceedings. Such proceedings can be costly, time consuming and unpredictable and, therefore, no assurance can be given that
the final outcome of such proceedings will not materially impact our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. While we maintain insurance
coverage that we believe is adequate to mitigate the risks of such proceedings, no assurance can be given that the amount or scope of existing insurance
coverage will be sufficient to cover losses arising from such matters.
On July 14, 2020, the Company filed a lawsuit for damages and declaratory relief in state court in New York relating to a transfer fee of $50 million that
was assessed by the Indiana Gaming Commission upon the Company’s purchase of Hoosier Park Racino and Casino in 2017 from Centaur Holdings, LLC.
Contemporaneous with the filing of the lawsuit, the Company notified Centaur that it was withholding payment of $50 million from Centaur Holdings that
was otherwise due as a portion of a deferred payment for the purchase from Centaur. In the lawsuit, the Company seeks a declaration from the Court that
the Sellers are required to indemnify Caesars for its losses arising out of or relating to payment of the transfer fee and that the Company is entitled to offset
the $50 million transfer fee against payments otherwise due to Centaur. The Defendants in that suit have filed
108
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Motions to Dismiss the Company’s claims. Briefing on the Motion has been concluded and the parties will await a decision from the Court.
General
In addition, we are a party to various legal and administrative proceedings, which have arisen in the normal course of our business. Estimated losses are
accrued for these proceedings when the loss is probable and can be estimated. The current liability for the estimated losses associated with these
proceedings is not material to our consolidated financial condition and those estimated losses are not expected to have a material impact on our results of
operations.
Contractual Commitments
Agreements with Horsemen and Pari-mutuel Clerks
The Federal Interstate Horse Racing Act and the state racing laws in Ohio and Florida require that, in order to simulcast races, we have written agreements
with the horse owners and trainers at those racetracks. In Ohio and Florida, we must have an agreement with the representative of the horse owners. We
have all the requisite agreements in place referenced in this sub section at Scioto Downs and Pompano. Certain agreements referenced above may be
terminated upon written notice by either party.
The following contractual commitments were assumed by the Company associated with Former Caesars as result of the consummation of the Merger.
Extension of Casino Operating Contract and Ground Lease for Harrah’s New Orleans
On April 1, 2020, the Company and the State of Louisiana, by and through the Louisiana Gaming Control Board (the “LGCB”), entered into an Amended
and Restated Casino Operating Contract (as amended by a First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Casino Operating Contract dated April 9, 2020,
the “Casino Operating Contract”) to amend and restate the casino operating contract between the Company and the LGCB with respect to Harrah’s New
Orleans to, among other things: (a) extend the term of the Company’s authority to conduct gaming operations at Harrah’s New Orleans for thirty (30) years
to 2054; (b) require the Company to make (i) a capital investment of $325 million on or around Harrah’s New Orleans by July 15, 2024 (subject to
extensions for force majeure events) (the “Capital Investment”), (ii) certain one-time payments totaling $65 million to the City of New Orleans (the “City”)
and the State of Louisiana, (iii) annual payments totaling $9 million to the City and the State of Louisiana and (iv) an annual license payment of $3 million
to the LGCB starting April 1, 2022; and (c) delay the date by which the Company must deliver certain payments to the State of Louisiana and the City
primarily driven by the reopening date of the casino.
On April 3, 2020, the Company, New Orleans Building Corporation (“NOBC”) and the City (collectively, the “Ground Lease Parties”) entered into a
Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement (as amended by a letter agreement of the same date, the “Ground Lease”) to amend and restate the ground
lease among the Ground Lease Parties with respect to Harrah’s New Orleans to, among other things: (a) require the Company to make (i) the Capital
Investment, (ii) certain payments to the City as also required by the Casino Operating Contract and (iii) certain one-time payments totaling $29 million to
NOBC; (b) increase the minimum amount of certain annual payments to be made by the Company to NOBC; (c) provide that NOBC approves (subject to
the satisfaction of certain conditions) of (i) the consummation of the Merger and (ii) a sale-leaseback transaction between the Company and an affiliate of
VICI; and (d) delay the date by which the Company must deliver certain payments to the City and NOBC primarily driven by the reopening date of the
casino.
Former Caesars made certain of the payments described above for a total of $61 million, of which $47 million was reflected as additional gaming rights
acquired. Subsequent to the Merger, the Company made additional payments totaling approximately $20 million which were also reflected as additional
gaming rights.
Sports Sponsorship/Partnership Obligations
We have agreements with certain professional sports leagues and teams, sporting event facilities and sports television networks for tickets, suites, and
advertising, marketing, promotional and sponsorship opportunities. As of December 31, 2020, obligations related to these agreements were $304 million
with contracts extending through 2035, which includes leasing of event suites that are generally considered short term leases for which we do not record a
right of use asset or lease liability. We recognize expenses in the period services are rendered in accordance with the various agreements. In addition, assets
or liabilities may be recorded related to the timing of payments as required by the respective agreement. On September 1, 2020, we amended our agreement
with Turner Sports, Inc. for advertising and televised specials. On September 10, 2020, the Company entered into a multi-year agreement with ESPN
including link integrations from ESPN’s website and app to sportsbooks with our sports betting partner, William Hill.
109
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Self-Insurance
We are self-insured for workers compensation and other risk insurance, as well as health insurance and general liability. Our total estimated self-insurance
liability was $223 million as of December 31, 2020.
Due to the novel nature of the disruption resulting from the COVID-19 public health emergency, actuarial data is limited for determining its effect. The
assumptions utilized by our actuaries are subject to significant uncertainty and if outcomes differ from these assumptions or events develop or progress in a
negative manner, the Company could experience a material adverse effect and additional liabilities may be recorded in the future. Alternatively, as a result
of the current work stoppages, a reduction of claims in future periods could be beneficial to our financial condition and results of operations.
Contingent Liabilities
Uncertainties
Since 2009, Harrah’s New Orleans has undergone audits by state and local departments of revenue related to sales taxes on hotel rooms, parking and
entertainment complimentaries. The periods that have been or are currently being audited are 2004 through 2016. In connection with these audits, certain
periods have been paid under protest or are currently in various stages of litigation. On July 2, 2019, the judge denied Harrah’s New Orleans’ motion for
partial summary judgment and granted the Department of Revenue’s (the “Department”) partial motion for summary judgment, finding that Harrah’s New
Orleans owes state sales taxes, as well as district and New Orleans occupancy taxes to the Department on all discounted or complimentary rooms furnished
by Harrah’s New Orleans to patrons or guests at Harrah’s New Orleans hotel and certain third party hotels. Harrah’s appealed the trial Court’s decision to
the Louisiana Court of Appeal, which Appeal was rejected. Harrah’s has since petitioned to the Louisiana Supreme Court for review of the Appeals Court’s
decision. On January 9, 2021, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued a ruling granting in part and denying in part the Company’s Petition for Appeal. In its
decision, the Supreme Court upheld the lower Courts’ decisions that the Company must pay taxes for complimentaries at Harrah’s New Orleans, but
overturned the lower Courts’ rulings that the Company must pay such taxes for third party hotels. This matter will now proceed to trial for a determination
of the amount of taxes due pursuant to the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling. Under Former Caesars, $9 million has been paid under protest and is being
held in escrow by the Department. Harrah’s New Orleans had accrued contingent liabilities of $43 million on December 31, 2020.
Weather disruption - Lake Charles
On August 27, 2020 Hurricane Laura made landfall on Lake Charles as a Category 4 storm. The hurricane severely damaged the Isle of Capri Casino Lake
Charles and the Company has recorded an insurance receivable of $44 million, of which $15 million related to fixed asset impairments and $29 million
related to remediation costs and repairs that have been incurred in the year ended December 31, 2020. The property will remain closed until construction of
a new land-based casino is complete.
110
Note 12. Long-Term Debt
(Dollars in millions)
Secured Debt
CEI Senior Secured Notes
CEI Revolving Credit Facility
ERI Term Loan
CRC Term Loan
CRC Incremental Term Loan
CRC Revolving Credit Facility
CRC Senior Secured Notes
Convention Center Mortgage Loan
Lumière Loan
Unsecured Debt
CEI Senior Notes
CRC Notes
5% Convertible Notes
6% Senior Notes
6% Senior Notes
7% Senior Notes
Special Improvement District Bonds
Long-term notes and other payables
Total debt
Current portion of long-term debt
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Final
Maturity
Rates
Face Value
Book Value
Book Value
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
2025
2025
N/A
2024
2025
2022
2025
2025
N/A
2027
2025
2024
2026
2025
2023
2037
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
6.25%
variable
N/A
variable
variable
variable
5.75%
7.70%
N/A
8.125%
5.25%
5.00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.30%
$
$
$
3,400 $
—
—
4,559
1,796
—
1,000
400
—
1,800
1,700
315
—
—
—
51
2
15,023
(67)
—
14,956 $
$
15,466
3,333 $
—
—
4,133
1,707
—
981
397
—
1,768
1,499
288
—
—
—
51
2
14,159
(67)
(19)
14,073 $
883 $
—
—
491
—
—
—
—
—
246
—
—
—
582
879
370
—
3
2,571
(246)
—
2,325
34
Deferred finance charges associated with the CEI Revolving Credit Facility
Long-term debt
Unamortized premiums, discounts and deferred finance charges
(d)
Fair value
____________________
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Borrowing rates for our revolving credit facilities vary based on the election made at the time of draw down.
LIBOR plus 2.75%.
LIBOR plus 4.50%.
Approximately $7 million of deferred financing costs related to our revolving credit facilities are included within Other assets, net as of December 31, 2019.
Annual Estimated Debt Service Requirements as of December 31, 2020
(In millions)
Annual maturities of long-term debt
Estimated interest payments
Total debt service obligation
(a)
2021
67 $
840
907 $
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2024
2025
Thereafter
Total
67 $
810
877 $
67 $
790
857 $
4,753 $
810
5,563 $
8,226 $
480
8,706 $
1,843 $
230
2,073 $
15,023
3,960
18,983
____________________
(a)
Debt principal payments are estimated amounts based on maturity dates and potential borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. Interest payments are estimated based on the
forward-looking LIBOR curve and include the estimated impact of the seven interest rate swap agreements related to our CRC Credit Facility (see Note 8). Actual payments may differ from
these estimates.
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt
The current portion of long-term debt as of December 31, 2020 includes the principal payments on the term loans, other unsecured borrowings, and special
improvement district bonds that are contractually due within 12 months.
111
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Debt Discounts or Premiums and Deferred Finance Charges
Debt discounts or premiums and deferred finance charges incurred in connection with the issuance of debt are amortized to interest expense based on the
related debt agreements primarily using the effective interest method. Unamortized discounts are written off and included in our gain or loss calculations to
the extent we extinguish debt prior to its original maturity date.
Fair Value
The fair value of debt has been calculated primarily based on the borrowing rates available as of December 31, 2020 based on market quotes of our
publicly traded debt. We classify the fair value of debt within Level 1 and Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
New Debt Transactions
The Company was party to a credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto dated as of April 17,
2017 (as amended the “ERI Credit Facility”), consisting of a $1.5 billion term loan facility (the “ERI Term Loan”) and a $500 million revolving credit
facility (the “ERI Revolving Credit Facility”).
In an effort to maintain liquidity and provide financial flexibility as the effects of COVID-19 continued to evolve and impact global financial markets, the
Company borrowed $465 million under the revolving credit facility on March 16, 2020, which we repaid in July 2020 utilizing, in part, proceeds from the
sale of the Company’s interests in Kansas City and Vicksburg.
On July 6, 2020, Colt Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Escrow Issuer”), issued $3.4 billion aggregate principal amount
of 6.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2025, $1.8 billion aggregate principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes due 2027 and $1.0 billion aggregate principal
amount of 5.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 (agreements defined below).
On July 20, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, the Company entered into a new credit agreement (“CEI Credit Agreement”), which
provide a five-year senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.2 billion. In addition, Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
(“CRC”) entered into incremental amendments to the CRC Credit Agreement, which provided a $1.8 billion incremental term loan (agreements defined
below).
A portion of the proceeds from these arrangements was used to prepay in full the loans outstanding and terminate all commitments under the ERI Credit
Facility, and to satisfy and discharge the Company’s 6% Senior Notes due 2025, 6% Senior Notes due 2026 and the 7% Senior Notes due 2023.
The 6% Senior Notes due 2025 were redeemed at a redemption price of 104.5%, the 7% Senior Notes due 2023 were redeemed at a redemption price of
103.5%, and $210 million aggregate principal amount of the 6% Senior Notes due 2026 was redeemed at a redemption price of 106% with the remaining
balance redeemed at a redemption price of 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus the Applicable Premium, as defined in the indenture for the
6% Senior Notes due 2026. The redemption of these senior notes resulted in a loss on extinguishment of $132 million during the year ended December 31,
2020, which is recorded within Loss on extinguishment of debt on the Statement of Operations.
CEI Senior Secured Notes due 2025
On July 6, 2020, the Escrow Issuer issued $3.4 billion in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 pursuant to an indenture
dated July 6, 2020 (the “CEI Senior Secured Notes”), by and among the Escrow Issuer, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as collateral agent. The Company assumed the rights and obligations under the CEI Senior Secured Notes and the indenture governing such
notes on July 20, 2020. The CEI Senior Secured Notes will mature on July 1, 2025 with interest payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on January 1 and
July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2021.
CEI Senior Notes due 2027
On July 6, 2020, the Escrow Issuer issued $1.8 billion in aggregate principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes due 2027 pursuant to an indenture, dated July
6, 2020 (the “CEI Senior Notes”), by and between the Escrow Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. The Company assumed the rights and
obligations under the CEI Senior Notes and the indenture governing such notes on July 20, 2020. The CEI Secured Notes will mature on July 1, 2027 with
interest payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2021.
112
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
CEI Revolving Credit Facility
On July 20, 2020, the Escrow Issuer entered into a new credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, U.S. Bank National
Association, as collateral agent, and certain banks and other financial institutions and lenders party thereto, which provide for a five-year CEI Revolving
Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.2 billion (the “CEI Revolving Credit Facility”). The CEI Revolving Credit Facility matures in 2025
and includes a letter of credit sub-facility of $250 million.
The interest rate per annum applicable under the CEI Revolving Credit Facility, at the Company’s option is either (a) LIBOR adjusted for certain additional
costs, subject to a floor of 0% or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the prime rate as
determined by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and (iii) the one-month adjusted LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, in each case plus an applicable margin. Such
applicable margin shall be 3.25% per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan and 2.25% per annum in the case of any base rate loan, subject to three 0.25%
step-downs based on the Company’s total leverage ratio.
Additionally, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee in respect of any unused commitments under CEI Revolving Credit Facility in the amount
of 0.50% of principal amount of the commitments of all lenders, subject to a step-down to 0.375% based upon the Company’s total leverage ratio. The
Company is also required to pay customary agency fees as well as letter of credit participation fees computed at a rate per annum equal to the applicable
margin for LIBOR borrowings on the dollar equivalent of the daily stated amount of outstanding letters of credit, plus such letter of credit issuer’s
customary documentary and processing fees and charges and a fronting fee in an amount equal to 0.125% of the daily stated amount of such letter of credit.
The Company had $1.2 billion of available borrowing capacity under the CEI Revolving Credit Facility, after consideration of $19 million in outstanding
letters of credit under CEI Revolving Credit Facility, as of December 31, 2020.
CRC Senior Secured Notes due 2025
On July 6, 2020, the Company issued $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2025 pursuant to an indenture, dated July 6,
2020 (the “CRC Senior Secured Notes”), by and among the Escrow Issuer, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman
Islands Branch, as collateral agent. In connection with the consummation of the Merger, CRC assumed the rights and obligations under the CRC Senior
Secured Notes and the CRC Senior Secured Notes. The CRC Senior Secured Notes will mature on July 1, 2025 with interest payable semi-annually in cash
in arrears on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2021.
Convention Center Mortgage Loan
On September 18, 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement with VICI to borrow a five-year, $400 million Forum Convention Center mortgage
loan (the “Mortgage Loan”). The Mortgage Loan bears interest at a rate of, initially, 7.7% per annum, which escalates annually to a maximum interest rate
of 8.3% per annum.
Lumière Loan
The Company borrowed $246 million from GLPI to fund the purchase price of the real estate underlying Lumière, which was scheduled to mature on
October 1, 2020. On June 24, 2020, the Company received approval from Missouri Gaming Commission to sell the real estate underlying Lumière to GLPI
and leaseback the property under a long-term financing obligation. As of December 31, 2020, the Lumière loan has been satisfied in full and the real estate
has been refinanced under a financing obligation. See Note 10.
Assumed Debt Activity
Former Caesars and its subsidiaries incurred the following indebtedness that remained outstanding following the consummation of the Merger.
CRC Term Loans and CRC Revolving Credit Facility
CRC is party to the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2017 (as amended, the “CRC Credit Agreement”), which included a $1.0 billion five-year
revolving credit facility (the “CRC Revolving Credit Facility”) and an initial $4.7 billion seven-year first lien term loan (the “CRC Term Loan”), which
was increased by $1.8 billion pursuant to an incremental agreement executed in connection with the Merger (the “CRC Incremental Term Loan”).
113
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The CRC Term Loan matures in 2024. The CRC Incremental Term Loan matures in 2025. The CRC Revolving Credit Facility matures in 2022 and
includes a letter of credit sub-facility. The CRC Term Loan requires scheduled quarterly principal payments in amounts equal to 0.25% of the original
aggregate principal amount, with the balance due at maturity. The CRC Credit Agreement also includes customary voluntary and mandatory prepayment
provisions, subject to certain exceptions. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $65 million was committed to outstanding letters of credit. As of
December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding under the CRC Revolving Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the CRC Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to either (a) LIBOR adjusted for certain additional costs, subject to a floor of 0%
or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the prime rate as determined by Credit Suisse AG,
Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent under the CRC Credit Agreement and (iii) the one-month adjusted LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, in each case
plus an applicable margin. Such applicable margin shall be (a) with respect to the CRC Term Loan, 2.75% per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan or
1.75% per annum in the case of any base rate loan, (b) with respect to the CRC Incremental Term Loan, 4.50% per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan or
3.50% in the case of any base rate loan and (c) in the case of the CRC Revolving Credit Facility, 2.25% per annum in the case of any LIBOR loan and
1.25% per annum in the case of any base rate loan, subject in the case of the CRC Revolving Credit Facility to two 0.125% step-downs based on CRC’s
senior secured leverage ratio (“SSLR”), the ratio of first lien senior secured net debt to adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization. The CRC Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a financial covenant discussed below.
In addition, CRC is required to pay a commitment fee in respect of any commitments under the CRC Revolving Credit Facility in the amount of 0.50% of
the principal amount of the commitments, subject to step-downs to 0.375% and 0.25% based upon CRC’s SSLR. CRC is also required to pay customary
agency fees as well as letter of credit participation fees computed at a rate per annum equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR borrowings on the dollar
equivalent of the daily stated amount of outstanding letters of credit, plus such letter of credit issuer’s customary documentary and processing fees and
charges and a fronting fee in an amount equal to 0.125% of the daily stated amount of such letter of credit.
CRC Notes
On October 16, 2017, CRC issued $1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior notes due 2025 (the “CRC Notes”).
Former Caesars 5% Convertible Notes
On October 6, 2017, Former Caesars issued $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.00% convertible senior notes maturing in 2024 (the “5%
Convertible Notes”).
The 5% Convertible Notes are convertible into the weighted average of the number of shares of Company Common Stock and amount of cash actually
received per share by holders of common stock of Former Caesars that made elections for consideration in the Merger. As of December 31, 2020, we have
paid approximately $903 million and issued approximately 10.8 million shares upon conversion of $770 million in aggregate principal amount of the 5%
Convertible Notes during 2020.
The Company has determined that the 5% Convertible Notes contain derivative features that require bifurcation. The Company separately accounts for the
liability component and equity conversion option of the 5% Convertible Notes. The difference between the overall instrument value and the value of the
liability component was assumed to be the value of the equity conversion option component. The value of the liability is determined based on a discounted
cash flow of the debt instrument. See Note 8 for more information on the 5% Convertible Notes’ fair value measurements.
Net amortization of the debt issuance costs and the discount and/or premium associated with the Company’s indebtedness totaled $80 million, $8 million
and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization of debt issuance costs is computed using the effective
interest method and is included in interest expense.
114
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Summary of Debt and Revolving Credit Facility Cash Flows from Financing Activities in 2020
(In millions)
CEI Senior Secured Notes
CEI Revolving Credit Facility
ERI Term Loan
CRC Term Loan
CRC Incremental Term Loan
CRC Senior Secured Notes
Convention Center Mortgage Loan
CEI Senior Notes
6% Senior Notes 2026
6% Senior Notes 2025
7% Senior Notes
ERI Revolving Credit Facility
Total
____________________
*
Does not include lease related extinguishment costs.
Debt Covenant Compliance
$
$
Proceeds
Repayments
Debt issuance and extension
costs and fees*
3,400 $
900
—
—
1,800
1,000
400
1,800
—
—
—
465
9,765 $
— $
900
499
23
5
—
—
—
600
875
375
465
3,742 $
73
16
—
—
96
21
3
34
54
39
13
—
349
The CRC Credit Agreement, the CEI Revolving Credit Facility and the indentures governing the CEI Senior Secured Notes, the CEI Senior Notes, the
CRC Senior Secured Notes and the CRC Notes contain covenants which are standard and customary for these types of agreements. These include negative
covenants, which, subject to certain exceptions and baskets, limit the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to (among other items) incur additional
indebtedness, make investments, make restricted payments, including dividends, grant liens, sell assets and make acquisitions.
The indenture for the 5% Convertible Notes contained limited covenants as a result of amendments that became effective in connection with the
consummation of the Merger. The CRC Revolving Credit Facility and CEI Revolving Credit Facility include a maximum first-priority net senior secured
leverage ratio financial covenant of 6.35:1, which is applicable solely to the extent that certain testing conditions are satisfied. Failure to comply with such
covenants could result in an acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness outstanding under the relevant debt document.
The Company’s results of operations have been materially adversely affected by the impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency. As a result, the
current terms of the CEI Credit Agreement and the CRC Credit Agreement provide that the financial covenant measurement period is not effective through
September 30, 2021 so long as the Company and CRC, respectively, comply with a minimum liquidity requirement, which includes any such availability
under the applicable revolving credit facilities.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company was in compliance with all of the applicable financial covenants under the CEI Credit Agreement, the CRC Credit
Agreement, CEI Senior Secured Notes, CEI Senior Notes, and CRC Senior Secured Notes, 5% Convertible Notes and CRC Notes.
Guarantees
The CEI Revolving Credit Facility and the CEI Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each existing and future material wholly-
owned domestic subsidiary of CEI (subject to certain exceptions) and are secured by substantially all of the existing and future property and assets of CEI
and its subsidiary guarantors (subject to certain exceptions). The CEI Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by such subsidiaries.
The CRC Credit Agreement and the CRC Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each existing and future material wholly-
owned domestic subsidiary of CRC (subject to certain exceptions) and are secured by substantially all of the existing and future property and assets of CEI
and its subsidiary guarantors (subject to certain exceptions). The CRC Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by such subsidiaries.
115
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 13. Revenue Recognition
Accounting Policies
Casino Revenues
The Company recognizes as casino revenue the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses, not the total
amount wagered. Progressive jackpots are accrued and charged to revenue at the time the obligation to pay the jackpot is established. Gaming revenues are
recognized net of certain cash and free play incentives. Pari-mutuel commissions consist of commissions earned from thoroughbred and harness racing and
importing of simulcast signals from other race tracks and are recognized at the time wagers are made. Such commissions are a designated portion of the
wagering handle as determined by state racing commissions and are shown net of the taxes assessed by state and local agencies, as well as purses and other
contractual amounts paid to horsemen associations. The Company recognizes revenues from fees earned through the exporting of simulcast signals to other
race tracks at the time wagers are made, which are recorded on a gross basis. Such fees are based upon a predetermined percentage of handle as contracted
with the other race tracks.
Non-gaming Revenues
Hotel, food and beverage, and other operating revenues are recognized as services are performed and is the net amount collected from the customer for
such goods and services. Hotel, food and beverage services have been determined to be separate, stand-alone performance obligations and is recorded as
revenue as the good or service is transferred to the customer over the customer’s stay at the hotel or when the delivery is made for the food and beverage.
Advance deposits for future hotel occupancy, convention space or food and beverage services contracts are recorded as deferred income until the revenue
recognition criteria has been met. The Company also provides goods and services that may include multiple performance obligations, such as for packages,
for which revenues are allocated on a pro rata basis based on each service's stand-alone selling price.
The Company’s consolidated statement of operations presents net revenue disaggregated by type or nature of the good or service. A summary of net
revenues disaggregated by type of revenue and reportable segment is presented below. We recast previously reported segment amounts to conform to the
way management assesses results and allocates resources for the current year. Refer to Note 1 and Note 19 for additional information on the Company’s
reportable segments.
(In millions)
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
Net revenues
(In millions)
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
Net revenues
(In millions)
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
Net revenues
$
$
$
$
$
$
Las Vegas
Regional
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Managed,
International &
CIE
Corporate and
Other
319 $
130
186
116
751 $
1,972 $
206
264
103
2,545 $
46 $
1
—
116
163 $
— $
—
—
15
15 $
Las Vegas
Regional
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Managed,
International &
CIE
Corporate and
Other
— $
—
—
—
— $
1,808 $
301
300
111
2,520 $
— $
—
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
8
8 $
Las Vegas
Regional
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Managed,
International &
CIE
Corporate and
Other
1,553 $
247
184
71
2,055 $
— $
—
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
1
1 $
— $
—
—
—
— $
116
Total
Total
Total
2,337
337
450
350
3,474
1,808
301
300
119
2,528
1,553
247
184
72
2,056
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Accounts Receivable and Credit Risk
We issue credit to approved casino customers following investigations of creditworthiness. Business or economic conditions or other significant events
could affect the collectability of these receivables. Accounts receivable are non-interest bearing and are initially recorded at cost.
Marker play represents a significant portion of our overall table games volume. We maintain strict controls over the issuance of markers and aggressively
pursue collection from those customers who fail to pay their marker balances timely. These collection efforts include the mailing of statements and
delinquency notices, personal contacts, the use of outside collection agencies and civil litigation. Markers are generally legally enforceable instruments in
the United States. Markers are not legally enforceable instruments in some foreign countries, but the United States assets of foreign customers may be
reached to satisfy judgments entered in the United States. We consider the likelihood and difficulty of enforceability, among other factors, when we issue
credit to customers who are not residents of the United States.
Trade receivables, including casino and hotel receivables, are typically non-interest bearing. Accounts are written off when management deems the account
to be uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts previously written off are recorded when received. An estimated allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained
to reduce the Company’s receivables to their carrying amount, which approximates fair value. The allowance is estimated based on specific review of
customer accounts, historical collection experience and reasonable forecasts which consider current economic and business conditions. Management
believes that as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, no significant concentrations of credit risk related to receivables existed.
Reserve for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
We reserve an estimated amount for receivables that may not be collected. Methodologies for estimating bad debt reserves range from specific reserves to
various percentages applied to aged receivables. Historical collection rates are considered, as are customer relationships, in determining specific reserves.
As with many estimates, management must make judgments about potential actions by third parties in establishing and evaluating our reserves for bad
debts.
Accounts receivable, net include the following amounts:
(In millions)
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage and hotel
Other
Accounts receivable, net
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
(In millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2018
Acquisitions
Provision for doubtful accounts
Write-offs less recoveries
Balance as of December 31, 2018
Provision for doubtful accounts
Write-offs less recoveries
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Former Caesars consolidation
Provision for doubtful accounts
Write-offs less recoveries
(b)
Balance as of December 31, 2020
____________________
(a)
Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
$
$
135 $
25
178
338 $
Contracts
Other
(a)
Total
$
$
1 $
1
1
(1)
2
1
1
4
95
18
3
120 $
— $
1
1
—
2
—
(1)
1
35
11
(29)
18 $
16
17
21
54
1
2
2
(1)
4
1
—
5
130
29
(26)
138
(b)
“Other” includes allowance associated with lease receivables under ASC 842. See Note 10 for further details.
See Note 3 for further details relating to the acquisition of Former Caesars.
117
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Contract and Contract Related Liabilities
The Company records contract or contract-related liabilities related to differences between the timing of cash receipts from the customer and the
recognition of revenue. The Company generally has three types of liabilities related to contracts with customers: (1) outstanding chip liability, which
represents the amounts owed in exchange for gaming chips held by a customer,(2) player loyalty program obligations, subsequently combined as Caesars
Rewards, which represents the deferred allocation of revenue relating to reward credits granted to Caesars Rewards members based on on-property
spending, including gaming, hotel, dining, retail shopping, and player loyalty program incentives earned, and (3) customer deposits and other deferred
revenue, which is primarily funds deposited by customers related to gaming play, advance payments received for goods and services yet to be provided
(such as advance ticket sales, deposits on rooms and convention space or for unpaid wagers), and deferred revenues associated with the Company’s existing
interests in William Hill (see Note 5). Except for deferred revenues related to William Hill, these liabilities are generally expected to be recognized as
revenue within one year of being purchased, earned, or deposited and are recorded within accrued other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Outstanding Chip Liability
The Company recognizes the impact on gaming revenues on an annual basis to reflect an estimate of the change in the value of outstanding chips that are
not expected to be redeemed. This estimate is determined by measuring the difference between the total value of chips placed in service less the value of
chips under our control. This measurement is performed on an annual basis utilizing a methodology in which a consistent formula is applied to estimate the
percentage of chips not in our custody that are not expected to be redeemed. In addition to the formula, certain judgments are made with regard to various
denominations and souvenir chips. The outstanding chip liability is included in accrued other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Caesars Rewards Loyalty Program
Caesars Rewards grants Reward Credits to Caesars Rewards Members based on on-property spending, including gaming, hotel, dining, and retail shopping
at all Caesars-affiliated properties. Members may redeem Reward Credits for complimentary or discounted goods and services such as rooms, food and
beverages, merchandise, free play, entertainment, and travel accommodations. Members are able to accumulate Reward Credits over time that they may
redeem at their discretion under the terms of the program. A member’s Reward Credit balance is forfeited if the member does not earn at least one Reward
Credit during a continuous six-month period.
Because of the significance of the Caesars Rewards program and the ability for customers to accumulate Reward Credits based on their past play, we have
determined that Reward Credits granted in conjunction with other earning activity represent a performance obligation. As a result, for transactions in which
Reward Credits are earned, we allocate a portion of the transaction price to the Reward Credits that are earned based upon the relative standalone selling
prices (“SSP”) of the goods and services involved. When the activity underlying the “earning” of the Reward Credits has a wide range of selling prices and
is highly variable, such as in the case of gaming activities, we use the residual approach in this allocation by computing the value of the Reward Credits as
described below and allocating the residual amount to the gaming activity. This allocation results in a significant portion of the transaction price being
deferred and presented as a Contract liability on our accompanying Balance Sheets. Any amounts allocated to Contract liabilities are recognized as revenue
when the Reward Credits are redeemed in accordance with the specific recognition policy of the activity for which the credits are redeemed. This balance is
further described below under Contract Liabilities.
Our Caesars Rewards loyalty program includes various tiers that offer different benefits, and members are able to earn credits towards tier status, which
generally enables them to receive discounts similar to those provided as complimentaries described below. We have determined that any such discounts
received as a result of tier status do not represent material rights, and therefore, we do not account for them as distinct performance obligations.
We have determined the SSP of a Reward Credit by computing the redemption value of credits expected to be redeemed. Because Reward Credits are not
otherwise independently sold, we analyzed all Reward Credit redemption activity over the preceding calendar year and determined the redemption value
based on the fair market value of the goods and services for which the Reward Credits were redeemed. We have applied the practical expedient under the
portfolio approach to our Reward Credit transactions because of the similarity of gaming and other transactions and the homogeneity of Reward Credits.
As part of determining the SSP for Reward Credits, we also determined that there is generally an amount of Reward Credits that is not redeemed, which is
considered “breakage.” We recognize the expected breakage proportionally with the pattern of revenue recognized related to the redemption of Reward
Credits. We periodically reassess our customer behaviors and revise our expectations as deemed necessary on a prospective basis.
118
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes the activity related to contract and contract-related liabilities:
(In millions)
Balance at January 1
Balance at December 31
Increase / (decrease)
Outstanding Chip Liability
2019
2020
$
$
10 $
32
22 $
9 $
10
1 $
Caesars Rewards
Customer Deposits and Other
Deferred Revenue
2020
2019
2020
2019
13 $
94
81 $
18 $
13
(5) $
172 $
278
106 $
28
172
144
The December 31, 2020 balances exclude liabilities related to assets held for sale recorded in 2020 and 2019 (see Note 4). The significant change in
contract and contract-related liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily due to the liabilities assumed subsequent to the Merger
with Former Caesars. The significant change in customer deposits and other deferred revenue during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily
attributed to the Company’s interests in William Hill received in exchange for providing a skin to William Hill for use over time. which is recorded in other
long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 5).
Complimentaries
The Company offers discretionary coupons and other discretionary complimentaries to customers outside of the loyalty program. Such complimentaries are
provided in conjunction with other revenue‑earning activities and are generally provided to encourage additional customer spending on those activities.
Accordingly, the Company allocates a portion of the transaction price received from such customers to the complimentary goods and services. The
Company performs this allocation based on the SSP of the underlying goods and services, which is determined based upon the weighted-average cash sales
prices received for similar services at similar points during the year. The retail value of complimentary food, beverage, hotel rooms and other services
provided to customers is recognized as a reduction of revenues for the department which issued the complimentary and revenue for the department
redeemed. Complimentaries provided by third parties at the discretion and under the control of the Company is recorded as an expense when incurred.
The Company’s revenues included complimentaries and loyalty point redemptions totaling $401 million, $292 million and $211 million for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Note 14. Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding during the reporting period.
Diluted EPS is computed similarly to basic EPS except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares from the
assumed exercise of stock options and the assumed vesting of restricted share units, if dilutive. The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming
that outstanding stock options were exercised, that outstanding restricted share units were released and that the proceeds from such activities were used to
acquire shares of common stock at the average market price during the reporting period.
For a period in which the Company generated a net loss, the weighted average shares outstanding - basic was used in calculating diluted loss per share
because using diluted shares would have been anti-dilutive to loss per share.
The following table illustrates the required disclosure of the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income per
share computations during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018:
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Net (loss) income available to Caesars
Shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock-based compensation awards
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
Basic (loss) income per share
Diluted (loss) income per share
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2020
(1,757) $
81 $
130
—
130
78
1
79
(13.50) $
(13.50) $
1.04 $
1.03 $
95
77
1
78
1.23
1.22
$
$
$
119
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Weighted-Average Number of Anti-Dilutive Shares Excluded from Calculation of EPS
(In millions)
Stock-based compensation awards
5% Convertible notes
Total anti-dilutive common stock
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2020
9
4
13
—
—
—
—
—
—
Note 15. Stock-Based Compensation and Stockholders’ Equity
Stock-Based Awards
The Company maintains long-term incentive plans which allow for granting stock-based compensation awards for directors, employees, officers, and
consultants or advisers who render services to the Company or its subsidiaries, based on Company Common Stock, including performance-based and
incentive stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance stock units, market-based stock units (“MSUs”), stock appreciation
rights, and other stock-based awards or dividend equivalents. Forfeitures are recognized in the period in which they occur.
Performance Incentive Plans
The Board of Directors (“Board”) adopted ERI’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (“2015 Plan”) on January 23, 2015 and the Company’s stockholders
subsequently approved the adoption of the 2015 Plan on June 23, 2015. On March 28, 2019, the Company’s Board approved an amendment to the 2015
Plan and the Company’s stockholders subsequently approved the adoption of the amended and restated 2015 Plan on June 24, 2019. The amendment to the
2015 Plan allows for 3 million shares available for grant, plus the number of shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan on the date the Company’s
stockholders approved the amendment.
Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company assumed the outstanding awards under the Former Caesars’ incentive plans, including the 2012
Performance Incentive Plan (the “2012 Incentive Plan”) and the 2017 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2017 Incentive Plan”). As of December 31, 2020,
there were approximately 111 thousand options outstanding under the 2012 Incentive Plan, which will expire between years 2022 and 2025 and there were
no RSUs outstanding under the 2012 Incentive Plan. Under the 2017 Incentive Plan, a total of 14 million shares of our common stock have been authorized
for issuance. No options have been granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan. As a result of the Merger, the Company no longer issues awards under the 2012
and 2017 Incentive Plans, as all future awards are issued under the 2015 Plan. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had 6 million shares available for
grant under the 2015 Plan, of which 2 million of unissued common shares were assumed from the Former Caesars’ 2017 Incentive Plan.
Stock options primarily vest ratably over three years. Certain RSUs granted to employees and executive officers vest and become non-forfeitable upon the
third anniversary of the date of grant, and certain RSUs granted to employees and executive officers vest ratably either over three or four years. RSUs
granted to non-employee directors generally vest immediately and are issued on the vesting date, or may be deferred until a later date such as the date that
is the earlier of termination of service on the Board or the consummation of a change of control of the Company. Performance awards relate to the
achievement of defined levels of performance and are generally measured over a one or two-year performance period depending upon the award
agreement. If the performance award levels are achieved, the awards earned will vest and become payable at the end of the vesting period, defined as either
a one or two calendar year period following the performance period. Payout ranges are from 0% up to 200% of the award target. MSUs cliff vest over three
years.
In connection with the Merger, Former Caesars’ outstanding performance-based stock options ceased to represent an option or right to acquire shares of
Former Caesars common stock and were converted into an option or right to purchase shares of Company Common Stock on the same terms and
conditions as were applicable to such option immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger. Former Caesars’ unvested RSUs and MSUs were
converted into a number of RSUs or MSUs, as applicable, in respect of shares of Company Common Stock and remained subject to the same terms and
conditions as were applicable to such RSUs and MSUs immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger.
120
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company granted both RSUs and MSUs to members of management. Vesting of the awards
varies, and includes awards that cliff vest after a two or three year service period, as well as awards that vest ratably on each anniversary during the three
year service period. In addition, awards were granted to certain key individuals related to their efforts and the related shareholder return from potential
transactions. Vesting of the awards is subject to various service and performance conditions and will accelerate and vest immediately upon the closing of a
qualifying transaction as defined by the agreements. Certain awards contained a market-based performance condition with which the fair value of the
awards was determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The grant date fair value for these awards with a market-based performance condition was
approximately $7 million.
Total stock-based compensation expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income was $78 million, $20 million and $13 million during the
years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts are included in corporate expenses and, in the case of certain property
positions, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Restricted Stock Unit Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2020, as part of the annual incentive program, the Company granted RSUs to employees of the Company with an
aggregate fair value of $63 million. Each RSU represents the right to receive payment in respect of one share of the Company’s Common Stock.
In connection with the Merger, on July 20, 2020, each Former Caesars’ RSU that was eligible to vest based solely on the passage of time that was
outstanding as of immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger was converted into a RSU in respect of Company Common Stock and remained
subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable as of immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger.
A summary of the RSUs activity, including performance awards, for the year ended December 31, 2020 is presented in the following table:
Unvested outstanding as of December 31, 2019
(c)
(b)
Granted
Acquired
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested outstanding as of December 31, 2020
Units
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
(a)
1,246,641 $
1,307,059
1,876,969
(1,477,352)
(38,724)
2,914,593
35.56
48.60
38.24
34.58
41.88
43.54
____________________
(a)
(b)
(c)
Represents the weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs, which is the share price of our common stock on the grant date.
Included are 21,965 RSUs granted to non-employee members of the Board during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Assumed RSU shares of Former Caesars as of the Merger date.
Market-Based Stock Unit Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company granted approximately 450 thousand MSUs that are scheduled to cliff vest in three years. On the
vesting date, recipients will receive between 0% and 200% of the granted MSUs in the form of Company Common Stock based on the achievement of
specified market and service conditions. Based on the terms and conditions of the awards, the grant date fair value of the MSUs was determined using a
Monte Carlo simulation model. Key assumptions for the Monte Carlo simulation model are the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, expected
dividends and correlation coefficient. The effect of market conditions is considered in determining the grant date fair value, which is not subsequently
revised based on actual performance. The aggregate value of MSUs granted during the year ended December 31, 2020 was $20 million.
In connection with the Merger, on July 20, 2020, each MSU of Former Caesars was converted into a MSU in respect of shares of Company Common Stock
and remained subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable as of immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger.
121
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Unvested outstanding as of December 31, 2019
(b)
Granted
Acquired
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested outstanding as of December 31, 2020
Units
— $
449,639
124,984
(128,536)
—
446,087
Weighted- Average
Fair Value
(a)
—
44.83
63.36
47.09
—
49.37
____________________
(a)
(b)
Represents the fair value determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
Assumed MSU shares of Former Caesars as of the Merger date.
Stock Option Activity
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019
(a)
Acquired
Exercised
Forfeited
Expired
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2020
Exercisable as of December 31, 2020
____________________
(a)
Assumed stock options of Former Caesars as of the Merger date.
Stock Option Exercises
(Dollars in millions)
Option Exercises:
Number of options exercised
Cash received for options exercised
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised
Unrecognized Compensation Cost
Shares
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(years)
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)
135,956 $
111,478
(70,608)
(102)
—
176,724
176,724
60,549
9.96
28.91
8.31
26.65
—
22.57
22.57
11.69
3.28 $
1.71
1.71
2.58
7
9
9
4
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
70,608
1 $
5 $
—
— $
— $
120,120
—
3
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $92 million of unrecognized compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-
average period of 1.5 years.
Common Stock Offerings
On June 19, 2020, the Company completed the public offering of 20,700,000 shares (including the shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ overallotment
option) of Company Common Stock, at an offering price of $39.00 per share, which provided $772 million of proceeds, net of fees and estimated expenses
of $35 million.
On October 1, 2020, the Company completed the public offering of 35,650,000 shares (including the shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’
overallotment option) of Company Common Stock, at an offering price of $56.00 per share, which provided $1.9 billion of proceeds, net of fees and
estimated expenses of $50 million.
Share Repurchase Program
In November 2018, the Board authorized a $150 million common stock repurchase program (the “Share Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which the
Company may, from time to time, repurchase shares of common stock on the open market (either with or
122
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
without a 10b5-1 plan) or through privately negotiated transactions. The Share Repurchase Program has no time limit and may be suspended or
discontinued at any time without notice. There is no minimum number of shares of common stock that the Company is required to repurchase under the
Share Repurchase Program.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company has acquired 223,823 shares of common stock at an aggregate value of $9 million and an average of $40.80 per
share. No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.
Note 16. Employee Benefit Plans
401(k) Plans
The Company offered several 401(k) plans to substantially all employees who are not covered by collective bargaining agreements, who meet certain
eligibility requirements, namely terms of service. During 2019, all existing 401(k) plans merged into a single plan. Under the combined plan, the employer
matches contributions equal to 50% of the first 6%. In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed Former Caesars’ 401(k) plan and makes
comparable matching contributions to employees covered by its plan document.
The Company’s matching contribution expense totaled $10 million, $6 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Mountaineer’s qualified defined contribution plan (established by West Virginia legislation) covered substantially all of its employees. Contributions to the
ERI 401(k) Plan for the benefit of Mountaineer employees were $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Mountaineer was sold on December 6,
2019.
Defined-Benefit Plan
Scioto Downs sponsors a noncontributory defined-benefit plan covering all full-time employees meeting certain age and service requirements. On May 31,
2001, the plan was amended to freeze eligibility, accrual of years of service and benefits. As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of the plan assets was $1
million, and the fair value of the benefit obligations was $1 million. The plan assets are comprised primarily of money market and mutual funds whose
values are determined based on quoted market prices and are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. We did not make cash contributions to the
Scioto Downs pension plan during 2020, 2019 and 2018.
In addition, the Company also sponsors a defined-benefit plan for certain Tropicana Casino and Resort, Atlantic City employees under a Variable Annuity
Pension Plan. As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of both, the plan assets and benefit obligations, was $20 million. Contributions to the plan were $2
million during both years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed a defined-benefit plan for employees of the London Clubs International subsidiary that provides
benefits based on final pensionable salary. The plan is no longer accepting participants or employee contributions. The assets of the plan are held in a
separate trustee-administered fund, and death-in-service benefits, professional fees, and other expenses are paid by the pension plan. Annual contributions
are made as required. We account for this plan under the immediate recognition method, under which actuarial gains and losses are recognized in our
Statements of Operations in the year in which the gains and losses occur rather than deferring them into Other comprehensive income/(loss) and amortizing
them over future periods. Any such amounts are recorded in the fourth quarter of each year, and during 2020, we recognized a gain of $7 million. These
amounts do not reflect current compensation costs and are recorded outside of Income from operations, within discontinued operations on our Statements
of Operations.
As of December 31, 2020 total plan assets were $244 million with projected benefit obligations totaling $264 million, resulting in a net pension liability of
$20 million, which is recorded within liabilities held for sale on our Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2020, our estimated long-term expected return on
assets for this plan is 3.9% with a 1.4% discount rate. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we contributed $4 million to the plan.
Deferred Compensation
Upon Merger, CEI assumed Former Caesars deferred compensation plans, the Caesars Entertainment Corporation Executive Supplemental Savings Plan III
(“ESSP III”) and the Caesars Entertainment Corporation Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan. These plans are unfunded, non-qualified deferred
compensation plans. Payment obligations pursuant to the plans are unsecured general obligations of the Company and affiliates of the Company employing
participants in the ESSP III. The liability as of December 31, 2020 was $2 million, which was recorded in Deferred credits and other liabilities.
123
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Deferred Compensation Plans
As of December 31, 2020, certain current and former employees of Caesars, and our subsidiaries and affiliates, have balances under: (i) the Harrah’s
Entertainment, Inc. Executive Supplemental Savings Plan, (ii) the Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Executive Supplemental Savings Plan II, (iii) the Park Place
Entertainment Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, (iv) the Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, and (v) the Harrah’s
Entertainment, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (collectively, the “existing deferred compensation plans”). These plans are deferred
compensation plans that allow certain employees an opportunity to save for retirement and other purposes.
Each of the plans is now frozen and is no longer accepting contributions. However, participants may still earn returns on existing plan balances based upon
their selected investment alternatives, which are reflected in their deferral accounts. The total liability recorded in Deferred credits and other liabilities for
these plans was $49 million as of December 31, 2020.
Trust Assets
CEI is a party to a trust agreement (the “Trust Agreement”) and an escrow agreement with respect to all five of the existing deferred compensation plans
(the “Escrow Agreement”), each structured as so-called “rabbi trust” arrangements, which holds assets that may be used to satisfy obligations under the
existing deferred compensation plans above. Amounts held pursuant to the Trust Agreement and the Escrow Agreement were approximately $94 million as
of December 31, 2020 and have been reflected within Deferred charges and other assets on the Balance Sheets.
Multi-employer Pension Plans
As a result of the Merger, the Company continues to contribute to a number of multi-employer defined benefit pension plans under the terms of collective
bargaining agreements that cover union-represented employees of Former Caesars. Prior to the Merger, no significant contributions were made to such
plans. The risks of participating in these multi-employer plans are different from a single-employer plan in the following respects:
i. Assets contributed to the multi-employer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
ii.
iii.
If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating
employers.
If the Company chooses to stop participating in some of its multi-employer plans, the Company may be required to pay those plans an amount
based on the underfunding of the plan, referred to as a “withdrawal liability.”
124
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Multi-employer Pension Plan Participation
Pension Fund
Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders
Pension Plan
(d)
Legacy Plan of the UNITE HERE Retirement
Fund
(d)(e)
EIN/Pension Plan
Number
88-6016617/001
82-0994119/001
Local 68 Engineers Union Pension Plan
Painters IUPAT
(d)(f)
51-0176618/001
52-6073909/001
Other Funds
Total Contributions
____________________
(a)
Pension Protection
(a)
Act Zone Status
Contributions
(In millions)
2020
Green
Red
Yellow
Yellow
FIP/RP
(b)
Status
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
$
$
2020
5
4
—
—
5
14
Surcharge
Imposed
No
No
No
No
Expiration Date of
Collective
Bargaining
(c)
Agreement
May 31, 2023
Various up to May 31,
2023
April 30, 2022
Various up to June 30,
2021
Represents the Pension Protection Act zone status for applicable plan year beginning January 1, except where noted otherwise. The zone status is based on information that the Company
received from the plan administrator and is certified by the plan’s actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65% funded, plans in the yellow zone are
between 65% and less than 80% funded, and plans in the green zone are at least 80% funded. All plans detailed in the table above utilized extended amortization provisions to calculate
zone status.
Indicates plans for which a financial improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented.
The terms of the current agreement continue indefinitely until either party provides appropriate notice of intent to terminate the contract.
Prior to the Merger, Former Caesars provided more than 5% of the total contributions for the plan years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. As of the date the financial statements were
issued, Forms 5500 were not available for the 2020 plan year.
The HEREIU Pension Fund consists of two separate plans, the Legacy Plan of the HEREIU Pension Fund and the Adjustable Plan of the HEREIU Pension Fund. CEI makes a single
contribution to the HEREIU Pension Fund, the Trustees of which allocate such contribution between the Legacy Plan and the Adjustable Plan. The contribution amount reflected to the
Legacy Plan is the aggregate contribution made to the HEREIU Pension Fund before such allocation between the Legacy Plan and the Adjustable Plan of the HEREIU Pension Fund.
Plan years begin July 1.
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Note 17. Income Taxes
The components of the Company’s provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are presented below.
Components of Income/(Loss) Before Income Taxes
(In millions)
United States
Outside of the U.S.
Income Tax Provision
(In millions)
United States
Current
Federal
State & Local
Deferred
Federal
State & Local
Outside of the U.S.
Current
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
(1,634) $
2
(1,632) $
125 $
—
125 $
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2018
(43)
(24)
202
(11)
2
126
$
$
31 $
14
5
(6)
—
44 $
135
—
135
4
3
16
17
—
40
$
$
125
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Allocation of Income Tax Provision
(In millions)
Income tax provision applicable to:
Income from operations
Discontinued operations
Other comprehensive income
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
126 $
(2)
8
44 $
—
—
40
—
—
The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019
and 2018:
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation
Federal statutory rate
State and local taxes
State tax rate adjustment
Stock compensation
Goodwill impairment and dispositions
Nondeductible transaction expenses
Nondeductible convertible notes costs
Decrease in uncertain tax positions
Deferred tax benefit of foreign subsidiaries held for sale
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Valuation allowance
Tax credits
Other
Effective income tax rate
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
21.0 %
3.8 %
1.6 %
(0.1)%
(1.6)%
(0.5)%
(1.0)%
0.9 %
1.0 %
— %
(33.3)%
0.1 %
0.4 %
(7.7)%
21.0 %
7.8 %
(2.3)%
1.8 %
7.4 %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
1.8 %
(1.1)%
(1.2)%
35.2 %
21.0 %
3.7 %
8.9 %
(1.8)%
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
(1.6)%
(0.3)%
(1.1)%
1.0 %
29.8 %
126
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s net deferred taxes at December 31, 2020 and 2019 are
as follows:
(In millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Loss carryforwards
Foreign investment - held for sale
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Deferred revenue
Excess business interest expense
State combined reporting deduction
Accrued expenses
Credit carryforwards
CARES Act deferred payroll tax
Compensation programs
Financing obligation
Long-term lease obligation
Other
Deferred tax liabilities:
Identified intangibles
Other debt-related items
Prepaid expenses
Unrealized foreign exchange gain
Fixed assets
Right-of-use assets
Other
Valuation allowance
Net deferred tax liabilities
As of December 31,
2020
2019
$
$
1,071 $
78
51
66
61
29
74
106
17
34
2,557
187
16
4,347
(836)
(108)
(33)
(31)
(2,424)
(154)
(6)
(3,592)
(1,921)
(1,166) $
27
—
1
41
2
—
10
—
—
7
125
41
2
256
(151)
—
(5)
—
(218)
(41)
(9)
(424)
(29)
(197)
As a result of the Merger described in Note 3, the Company acquired $772 million of additional net deferred tax liabilities, net of necessary valuation
allowances.
A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax
asset will not be realized. Management must analyze all available positive and negative evidence regarding realization of the deferred tax assets and make
an assessment of the likelihood of sufficient future taxable income. We have provided a valuation allowance on certain federal, state, and foreign deferred
tax assets that were not deemed realizable based upon estimates of future taxable income. Included in the increase of valuation allowance of $1.9 billion is
$1.4 billion that was acquired as a result of the Merger. Additionally, the Company increased its beginning of year valuation allowance by $8 million as a
result of the Merger.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $3.0 billion, $9.2 billion and $127 million,
respectively. The federal net operating loss includes $479 million that does not expire. The remaining federal and state net operating losses will begin to
expire in 2030 and 2021, respectively. The foreign net operating losses do not expire. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had federal general business
tax credit and research tax credit carryforwards of $108 million, which begin to expire in 2029.
In general, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code provides an annual limitation with respect to the ability of a corporation to utilize its net operating
loss carryovers, as well as certain built-in losses, against future taxable income in the event of a change in ownership. The acquisition of Former Caesars in
July 2020 resulted in a change in ownership for purposes of Section 382, making its provisions applicable to the Company. However, it is unlikely that the
annual limitation on tax attribute usage
127
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
resulting from the acquisition will adversely affect the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryovers against its future taxable income.
Reconciliation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits
(In millions)
Balance as of beginning of year
Acquisition of Former Caesars
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Settlements
Expiration of statutes
Balance as of end of year
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
— $
152
1
(4)
(12)
137 $
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
We classify reserves for tax uncertainties within Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Deferred credits and other liabilities in our Balance
Sheets, separate from any related income tax payable or Deferred income taxes. Reserve amounts relate to any potential income tax liabilities resulting
from uncertain tax positions as well as potential interest or penalties associated with those liabilities.
We accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During 2020, we increased our accrual by $2 million, primarily
due to the Merger. There was no accrual during 2019 and 2018. There was an accrual for the payment of interest and penalties of $2 million as of
December 31, 2020. Included in the balances of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020 was approximately $123 million of unrecognized tax
benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate.
The Company, including its subsidiaries, files tax returns with federal, state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company does not have tax sharing agreements
with the other members within the consolidated group. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to US federal or state and local tax
examinations by tax authorities for years before 2017. We believe that it is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax benefits liability will not
materially change within the next 12 months. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are subject to significant uncertainty. Although we believe
that adequate provision has been made for such issues, there is the possibility that the ultimate resolution of such issues could have an adverse effect on our
earnings. Conversely, if these issues are resolved favorably in the future, the related provision would be reduced, thus having a favorable impact on
earnings.
Note 18. Related Parties
REI
As of December 31, 2020, REI owned approximately 4.1% of outstanding common stock of the Company. The directors of REI are the Company’s
Executive Chairman of the Board, Gary L. Carano, its Chief Executive Officer and Board member, Thomas R. Reeg, and its former Senior Vice President
of Regional Operations, Gene Carano. In addition, Gary L. Carano also serves as the Vice President of REI and Gene Carano also serves as the Secretary
and Treasurer of REI. Members of the Carano family, including Gary L. Carano and Gene Carano, own the equity interests in REI. For each of the years
ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, there were no related party transactions between the Company and the Carano Family other than compensation,
including salary and equity incentives and the CSY Lease listed below.
C. S. & Y. Associates
The Company owns the entire parcel on which Eldorado Reno is located, except for approximately 30,000 square feet which is leased from C. S. & Y.
Associates which is an entity partially owned by REI (the “CSY Lease”). The CSY Lease expires on June 30, 2057. Rent pursuant to the CSY Lease
amounted to $0.6 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019 there were no amounts due to
or from C. S. & Y. Associates.
Transactions with Horseshoe Baltimore
The Company holds an interest in Horseshoe Baltimore of approximately 44.3% which is accounted for as an equity method investment and is considered
to be a related party. These related party transactions include items such as casino management fees, reimbursement of various costs incurred by the
Company, on behalf of Horseshoe Baltimore, and the allocation of other general corporate expenses. A summary of the transactions with Horseshoe
Baltimore is provided in the table below.
128
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(In millions)
Transactions with Horseshoe Baltimore
Management fees
Allocated expenses
Due from/to Affiliates
Year Ended December 31,
2020
$
3
2
Amounts due from or to affiliates for each counterparty represent the net receivable or payable as of the end of the reporting period primarily resulting from
the transactions described above and settled on a net basis by each counterparty in accordance with the legal and contractual restrictions governing
transactions by and among the Company’s consolidated entities.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, Due from affiliates, net was $44 million and $4 million, respectively, and represented transactions with Horseshoe
Baltimore and William Hill.
Note 19. Segment Information
The executive decision maker of the Company reviews operating results, assesses performance and makes decisions on a “significant market” basis.
Management views each of the Company’s casinos as an operating segment. Operating segments are aggregated based on their similar economic
characteristics, types of customers, types of services and products provided, and their management and reporting structure. Prior to the Merger, our
principal operating activities occurred in five geographic regions and reportable segments: West, Midwest, South, East and Central, in addition to Corporate
and Other. Following the Merger, the Company’s principal operating activities occur in three regionally-focused and reportable segments. The reportable
segments are based on the similar characteristics of the operating segments with the way management assesses these results and allocates resources, which
is a consolidated view that adjusts for the effect of certain transactions between these reportable segments within Caesars: (1) Las Vegas, (2) Regional, and
(3) Managed, International, CIE, in addition to Corporate and Other. See table below for a summary of these segments. Also, see Note 4, Note 6 and Note 7
for a discussion of the impairment of intangibles and long-lived assets related to certain segments.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our properties (listed by segment in which each property is reported) as of December 31, 2020:
129
Las Vegas
(a)
(a)
(a)
Bally’s Las Vegas
Caesars Palace Las Vegas
The Cromwell
Flamingo Las Vegas
(a)
Harrah’s Las Vegas
The LINQ Hotel & Casino
Paris Las Vegas
Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino
(a)
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Regional
Managed, International, CIE
Eldorado Resort Casino Reno
Silver Legacy Resort Casino
Circus Circus Reno
MontBleu Casino Resort & Spa
Tropicana Laughlin Hotel & Casino
Isle Casino Hotel - Blackhawk
Lady Luck Casino - Black Hawk
Isle Casino Waterloo
(c)
(a)
(a)
(a)
Harrah’s Atlantic City
Harrah’s Laughlin
Harrah’s New Orleans
Hoosier Park
Indiana Grand
Bally’s Atlantic City
Caesars Atlantic City
Caesars Southern Indiana
(a)(i)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)(b)(e)
(a)
(a)
Managed
Harrah’s Ak-Chin
Harrah’s Cherokee
Harrah’s Cherokee Valley River
Harrah’s Resort Southern California
Horseshoe Baltimore
Caesars Windsor
Kings & Queens Casino
(a)(h)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(d)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(c)(j)
Isle Casino Bettendorf
Isle of Capri Casino Boonville
Isle of Capri Casino Kansas City
Isle Casino Racing Pompano Park
Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport
Isle of Capri Casino Hotel Lake Charles
(k)
Belle of Baton Rouge Casino & Hotel
Isle of Capri Casino Lula
Lady Luck Casino Vicksburg
Trop Casino Greenville
Eldorado Gaming Scioto Downs
Tropicana Casino and Resort, Atlantic City Horseshoe Council Bluffs
Grand Victoria Casino
Lumière Place Casino
Tropicana Evansville
Harrah’s Council Bluffs
Harrah’s Gulf Coast
Harrah’s Joliet
Harrah’s Lake Tahoe
Harrah’s Louisiana Downs
Harrah’s Metropolis
Harrah’s North Kansas City
Harrah’s Philadelphia
Harrah’s Reno
Harveys Lake Tahoe
Horseshoe Bossier City
Horseshoe Hammond
Horseshoe Tunica
(a)(b)(e)
(a)(g)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(d)
(a)
(a)
(e)
(a)(b)(f)
(a)
(a)
(a)(b)
(a)(b)
(a)(b)
(a)(b)
Caesars Dubai
International
Caesars Cairo
Ramses Casino
Emerald Casino Resort
Alea Glasgow
Alea Nottingham
The Empire Casino
(a)(b)
Manchester235
Playboy Club London
Rendezvous Brighton
The Sportsman
CIE
Caesars Interactive Entertainment
(a)(b)
(a)(b)
(a)(b)
(a)(b)
(a)(b)
(a)
___________________
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
These properties were acquired from the Merger with Former Caesars on July 20, 2020.
As a result of the Merger, these properties met the requirements for presentation as discontinued operations and held for sale as of December 31, 2020.
In April 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Eldorado Shreveport and MontBleu. The sale of Eldorado Shreveport closed on December 23, 2020 and the sale of MontBleu
is expected to close in the first half of 2021. As of December 31, 2020, MontBleu's assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale.
Kansas City and Vicksburg were sold on July 1, 2020.
On October 27, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Evansville, which is expected to close mid-2021, and on December 24, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement
to sell Caesars Southern Indiana, which is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021. In addition, the Company plans to enter into an agreement to divest of Horseshoe Hammond prior
to December 31, 2021, as the deadline was extended by the Indiana Gaming Commission. As of December 31, 2020, Evansville’s assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale.
On September 3, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Harrah’s Louisiana Downs, which is expected to close in the first half of 2021.
Harrah’s Reno was sold on September 30, 2020.
As of December 31, 2020, Horseshoe Baltimore was 44.3% owned and held as an equity-method investment.
Bally's Atlantic City was sold on November 18, 2020.
Eldorado Resorts Casino Shreveport was sold on December 23, 2020.
On December 1, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Belle of Baton Rouge to Casino Queen Holdings, which is expected to close in mid-2021. As of December 31, 2020,
Belle of Baton Rouge's assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale.
In addition to our properties listed above, other domestic and international properties, including Harrah’s Northern California, are authorized to use the
brands and marks of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. Additionally, a few of our properties operate off-track betting locations, including Hoosier Park, which
operates Winner’s Circle Indianapolis and Winner’s Circle New Haven; and Indiana Grand, which operates Winner’s Circle Clarksville. The LINQ
Promenade, listed above in our Las Vegas segment, is an open-air dining, entertainment, and retail promenade located on the east side of the Las Vegas
Strip next to The LINQ Hotel & Casino (the “LINQ”) that features the High Roller, a 550-foot observation wheel, and the Fly LINQ Zipline attraction. We
also own the CAESARS FORUM conference center, which is a 550,000 square feet conference center with 300,000 square feet of flexible meeting space,
two of the largest pillarless ballrooms in the world and direct access to the LINQ.
130
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
“Corporate and Other” includes certain unallocated corporate overhead costs and other adjustments, including eliminations of transactions among
segments, to reconcile to the Company’s consolidated results.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain operating data for the Company’s three reportable segments, in addition to Corporate and
Other. We recast previously reported segment amounts to conform to the way management assesses results and allocates resources for the current year.
(In millions)
Las Vegas:
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
Regional:
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
Managed, International, CIE:
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
Corporate and Other:
Net revenues
Adjusted EBITDA
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
751 $
133
— $
—
2,545
671
163
34
15
(101)
2,520
732
—
—
8
(35)
—
—
2,055
548
—
—
1
(32)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA - By Segment to Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Caesars
Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a measure of the Company’s performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as revenues less operating expenses and is
comprised of net income/(loss) before (i) interest expense, net of interest capitalized and interest income, (ii) income tax (benefit)/provision, (iii)
depreciation and amortization, and (iv) certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance at an operating property
level.
In evaluating Adjusted EBITDA you should be aware that, in the future, we may incur expenses that are the same or similar to some of the adjustments in
this presentation. The presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that future results will be unaffected by unusual or
unexpected items.
Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure commonly used in our industry and should not be construed as an alternative to net income/(loss) as an indicator
of operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow provided by operating activities as a measure of liquidity (as determined in accordance with
GAAP). Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies within the industry. Adjusted EBITDA is
included because management uses Adjusted EBITDA to measure performance and allocate resources, and believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides
investors with additional information consistent with that used by management.
131
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(In millions)
Adjusted EBITDA by Segment:
Las Vegas
Regional
Managed, International, CIE
Corporate and Other
Reconciliation to net (loss) income attributable to Caesars:
(c)
(b)
(a)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Provision for income taxes
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Other (loss) income
Interest expense, net
Depreciation and amortization
Impairment charges
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Stock-based compensation expense
Other items
(d)
(e)
Net (loss) income attributable to Caesars
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
133 $
671
34
(101)
737
1
(126)
(197)
176
(1,174)
(583)
(215)
(268)
(78)
(30)
(1,757) $
— $
732
—
(35)
697
—
(44)
(8)
9
(286)
(222)
(1)
(37)
(20)
(7)
81 $
—
548
—
(32)
516
—
(40)
—
(3)
(172)
(157)
(14)
(17)
(13)
(5)
95
____________________
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Taxes are recorded at the consolidated level and not estimated or recorded to our Las Vegas, Regional, and Managed, International, CIE segments.
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily represents loss on early repayment of debt in connection with the consummation of the Merger.
Other (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily represents gains resulting from the change in the foreign currency exchange rate associated with restricted cash held in
GBP and a derivative contract associated with our expected acquisition of William Hill, gains on William Hill UK and Flutter stock held by the Company and realized gains on conversion
of CEC’s 5% convertible notes. Partially offsetting these gains is a loss on the change in fair value of the derivative liability related to CEC’s 5% convertible notes.
Transaction costs and other operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily represent costs related to the Merger, various contract or license termination exit costs,
professional services, other acquisition costs and severance costs.
Other items represent internal labor charges related to certain departed executives, retention bonuses, business optimization expenses and contract labor.
(In millions)
Capital Expenditures, Net
Las Vegas
(a)
Regional
Managed, International, CIE
Corporate and Other
(a)
Total
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
32 $
104
1
32
169 $
— $
166
—
5
171 $
—
135
—
12
147
___________________
(a)
Includes $6 million of capital expenditures related to properties classified as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.
(In millions)
Total Assets
Las Vegas
Regional
Managed, International, CIE
Corporate and Other
Total
Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
$
$
21,464 $
13,732
548
641
36,385 $
—
6,787
—
(1,146)
5,641
132
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Schedule I
(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets
Intercompany receivables
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
Investment in subsidiaries
Property and equipment, net
Other assets, net
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Intercompany payables
Long-term debt, less current portion
Deferred income taxes
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
As of December 31,
2020
2019
$
$
$
$
3,038 $
—
128
6,798
18
513
10,495 $
231 $
—
5,084
4
160
5,479
5,016
10,495 $
80
(562)
127
3,854
18
111
3,628
163
232
1,949
—
167
2,511
1,117
3,628
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Information.
133
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Schedule I
(In millions)
Net revenues
Expenses:
Corporate expense
Management fee
Depreciation and amortization
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Total operating expenses
Operating loss
Other expense:
Interest expense
Gain (loss) on interests in subsidiaries
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Other (loss) income
(Loss) income from operations before income taxes
Income tax (provision) benefit
Net (loss) income
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
7 $
7 $
71
(36)
6
113
154
(147)
(257)
(1,346)
(132)
197
(1,685)
(72)
(1,757) $
$
65
(22)
5
57
105
(98)
(141)
210
(8)
9
(28)
109
81 $
—
42
(25)
4
6
27
(27)
(116)
201
—
(3)
55
40
95
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Information.
134
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Schedule I
(In millions)
Cash flows used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment, net
Former Caesars acquisition
Net cash in business combinations
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
Proceeds from sale of businesses, property and equipment, net of cash sold
Proceeds from the sale of investments
Cash flows used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from long-term debt and revolving credit facilities
Debt issuance and extinguishment costs
Repayments of long-term debt and revolving credit facilities
Net proceeds from (payments to) related parties
Cash paid to settle convertible notes
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing arrangement
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Cash flows provided by financing activities
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash
Net increase/(decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period
RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH TO
AMOUNTS REPORTED WITHIN THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Cash and cash equivalents in current assets
Restricted cash in current assets
Restricted and escrow cash included in other assets, net
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
2020
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
(296) $
(64) $
(8)
(8,470)
—
—
—
24
(8,454)
9,365
(353)
(3,339)
1,320
(903)
3,219
(16)
—
2,718
12,011
129
3,390
44
3,434 $
1,114 $
1,895
425
3,434 $
$
$
$
(5)
—
—
(1)
(209)
—
(215)
33
(1)
(736)
1,022
—
—
(8)
—
—
310
—
31
13
44 $
44 $
—
—
44 $
(66)
(8)
—
(1,010)
—
—
—
(1,018)
915
(26)
(70)
285
—
—
(12)
(9)
—
1,083
—
(1)
14
13
13
—
—
13
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Information.
135
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Schedule I
1. Background and basis of presentation
These condensed parent company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Rule 12-04, Schedule 1 of Regulation S-X, as the restricted
net assets of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries exceed 25% of the consolidated net assets of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries
(the “Company”). This information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this filing.
2. Restricted net assets of subsidiaries
Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have restrictions on their ability to pay dividends or make intercompany loans and advances pursuant to financing
arrangements and regulatory restrictions. The amount of restricted net assets the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries held as of December 31, 2020 was
approximately $4.9 billion. Such restrictions are on net assets of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The amount of restricted net assets in the
Company’s unconsolidated subsidiaries was not material to the financial statements.
3. Commitments, contingencies, and long-term obligations
For a discussion of the Company’s commitments, contingencies, and long-term obligations under its senior secured credit facilities, see Note 11 and
Note 12 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
136
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
We have one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: our common stock, par value $0.00001
per share. The following is a general description of the terms and provisions of our capital stock and related provisions of our certificate of incorporation
and our bylaws, each of which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.1 is a part. The
following description is only a summary of the material provisions of our capital stock, certificate of incorporation and bylaws and does not purport to be
complete and is subject and qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DCGL, our
certificate of incorporation and our bylaws. We encourage you to read our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and the applicable provisions of the
DGCL for additional information.
Exhibit 4.1
General
Our authorized capital stock consists of 300,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share.
Common Stock
Dividend rights
We will be permitted to pay dividends if, as and when declared by our board of directors, subject to compliance with limitations imposed by the DGCL.
The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive and share equally in these dividends as they may be declared by our board of directors out of funds
legally available for such purpose. We do not currently expect to pay dividends on our common stock.
Voting rights
Our common stock votes as a single class on all matters on which stockholders are entitled to vote, and each share of our common stock is entitled to cast
one vote in person or by proxy on such matters. Holders of our common stock do not have the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. Directors
are elected by a plurality of the shares actually voting on the matter at each annual meeting or special meeting called for the purpose of electing such
directors at which a quorum is present.
Liquidation rights
Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of our common stock will be entitled to receive, after
payment or provision for payment of all our debts and liabilities, all of our assets available for distribution.
Preemptive rights
Holders of our common stock are not entitled to any preemptive rights to subscribe for additional shares of our common stock, nor are they liable to further
capital calls or to assessments by us. Therefore, if we issue additional shares without the opportunity for existing stockholders to purchase more shares, a
stockholder’s ownership interest in our Company may be subject to dilution.
Other Rights or Preferences
Our common stock has no sinking fund, redemption provisions, or conversion or exchange rights, other than redemption provisions related to compliance
with gaming laws.
Transfer agent and registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
39337.00400
Limitation of liability and indemnification matters
We have entered into indemnification agreements with certain of our executive officers and each of our directors pursuant to which we have agreed to
indemnify such executive officers and directors against liability incurred by them by reason of their services as an executive officer or director to the fullest
extent allowable under applicable law. We also provide liability insurance for each officer and director for losses arising from claims or charges made
against them while acting in their capacities as our officer or director.
To the extent that indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our executive officers and directors pursuant to the
foregoing, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is
therefore unenforceable.
National market listing
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “CZR.”
39337.00400
Exhibit 10.3
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of November 18, 2020, by and
among CPLV PROPERTY OWNER LLC and CLAUDINE PROPCO LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company
(collectively, and together with their respective successors and assigns, “Landlord”), DESERT PALACE LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company, CEOC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (for itself and as successor by merger to Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation), and HARRAH’S LAS VEGAS, LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company (collectively, and together with their respective successors and assigns, “Tenant”) and, solely for the purposes
of the last paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease (as defined below), Propco TRS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“Propco TRS”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Landlord, Tenant and, solely for the purposes of the last paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease, Propco TRS
are parties to that certain Lease (CPLV) dated as of October 6, 2017, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Lease
(CPLV), dated as of December 26, 2018, as amended by that certain Omnibus Amendment to Leases, dated as of June 1, 2020, as
amended by that certain Second Amendment to Lease (CPLV), dated as of July 20, 2020, as amended by that certain Third
Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 30, 2020, and to the extent amended by that certain Amended and Restated
Omnibus Amendment to Leases, dated as of October 27, 2020 (collectively, as amended, the “Lease”), pursuant to which
Landlord leases to Tenant, and Tenant leases from Landlord, certain real property as more particularly described in the Lease;
WHEREAS, on the date hereof, (i) Bally’s Park Place LLC (“Operator”), as operator, Bally’s Atlantic City LLC, as
seller, and Premier Entertainment AC, LLC (as successor by assignment to Twin River Management Group, Inc.) (“Purchaser”),
as purchaser, are closing a purchase and sale transaction under that certain Agreement of Sale, dated as of April 24, 2020, with
respect to certain real property and (ii) Operator and Purchaser are closing a purchase and sale transaction under that certain
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2020, with respect to certain casino and related operations and assets, in each
case under clauses (i) and (ii), associated with the gaming and entertainment facility known as “Bally’s Atlantic City”, located in
Atlantic City, New Jersey (the “Bally’s Transaction”); and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Bally’s Transaction, the parties hereto desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound hereby, agree as follows:
1.
Definitions
. Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings
applicable to such terms, respectively, as set forth in the Lease.
2.
Amendments to the Lease
.
a. Triennial Minimum Cap Ex Amount B. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of “Triennial
Minimum Cap Ex Amount B” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference therein to “Four Hundred Twenty-
One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a reference to “Four Hundred Five
Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)”.
b. Partial Periods.
i.
ii.
Section 10.5(a)(v)(b) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein to “Four Hundred
Twenty-One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a reference to “Four
Hundred Five Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)” and (b) replace the
reference therein to “One Hundred Forty Million Six Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-
Three and 33/100 Dollars ($140,633,333.33)” with a reference to “One Hundred Thirty-Five Million Sixty-Six
Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($135,066,666.67)” and
The second sentence of Section 10.5(a)(v) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein to
“Four Hundred Twenty-One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a
reference to “Four Hundred Five Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)” and (b)
replace the reference therein to “One Hundred Forty Million Six Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Three Hundred
Thirty-Three and 33/100 Dollars ($140,633,333.33)” with a reference to “One Hundred Thirty-Five Million Sixty-
Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($135,066,666.67)”.
3.
No Other Modification or Amendment to the Lease
. The Lease shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly amended or modified by this Amendment.
From and after the date of this Amendment, all references in the Lease to the “Lease” shall be deemed to refer to the Lease as
amended by this Amendment.
4.
Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Amendment shall be construed according to and governed by the laws
of the jurisdiction(s) specified by the Lease without regard to its or their conflicts of law principles. The parties hereto
hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction located in such applicable jurisdiction
in connection with any proceeding arising out of or relating to this Amendment.
2
5.
Counterparts
. This Amendment may be executed by one or more of the parties hereto on any number of separate counterparts,
and all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile and/or .pdf
signatures shall be deemed to be originals for all purposes.
6.
Effectiveness
. This Amendment shall be effective, as of the date hereof, only upon execution and delivery by each of the parties hereto.
7.
Miscellaneous. If any provision of this Amendment is adjudicated to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, in
whole or in part, it will be deemed omitted to that extent and all other provisions of this Amendment will remain in full
force and effect. Neither this Amendment nor any provision hereof may be changed, modified, waived, discharged or
terminated orally, but only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change,
modification, waiver, discharge or termination is sought. The paragraph headings and captions contained in this
Amendment are for convenience of reference only and in no event define, describe or limit the scope or intent of this
Amendment or any of the provisions or terms hereof. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and permitted assigns.
[Signature Page Follows]
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their duly authorized
representatives, all as of the date hereof.
LANDLORD:
CPLV PROPERTY OWNER LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
CLAUDINE PROPCO LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
TENANT:
[Signatures Continue on Following Pages]
[Signature Page to Fourth Amendment to Las Vegas Lease]
DESERT PALACE LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
CEOC, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
HARRAH’S LAS VEGAS, LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
Acknowledged and agreed, solely for the purposes of the last paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease:
[Signatures Continue on Following Pages]
[Signature Page to Fourth Amendment to Las Vegas Lease]
PROPCO TRS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
[Signature Page to Fourth Amendment to Las Vegas Lease]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT OF GUARANTOR
The undersigned (“Guarantor”) hereby: (a) acknowledges receipt of the Fourth Amendment to Lease (the “Amendment”; capitalized terms
used herein without definition having the meanings set forth in the Amendment), dated as of November 18, 2020, by and among CPLV
Property Owner LLC and Claudine Propco LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company, collectively as Landlord, Desert Palace LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company, CEOC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (for itself and as successor by merger to Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation), and Harrah’s Las Vegas, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
collectively as Tenant, and the other parties party thereto; (b) consents to the terms and execution thereof; (c) ratifies and reaffirms
Guarantor’s obligations to Landlord pursuant to the terms of that certain Guaranty of Lease, dated as of July 20, 2020 (the “Guaranty”), by
and between Guarantor and Landlord, and agrees that nothing in the Amendment in any way impairs or lessens the Guarantor’s obligations
under the Guaranty; and (d) acknowledges and agrees that the Guaranty is in full force and effect and is valid, binding and enforceable in
accordance with its terms.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Acknowledgment and Agreement of Guarantor to be duly executed as of
November 18, 2020.
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
[Signature Page to Acknowledgment and Agreement of Guarantor]
Exhibit 10.7
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of November 18, 2020, by and
among the entities listed on Schedule A attached hereto (collectively, and together with their respective successors and assigns,
“Landlord”), the entities listed on Schedule B attached hereto (collectively, and together with their respective successors and
assigns, “Tenant”) and, solely for the purposes of the penultimate paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease (as defined below),
Propco TRS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Propco TRS”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Landlord, Tenant and, solely for the purposes of the penultimate paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease,
Propco TRS, are parties to that certain Lease (Non-CPLV), dated as of October 6, 2017, as amended by that certain First
Amendment to Lease (Non-CPLV), dated as of December 22, 2017, as amended by that certain Second Amendment to Lease
(Non-CPLV) and Ratification of SNDA, dated as of February 16, 2018, as amended by that certain Third Amendment to Lease
(Non-CPLV), dated as of April 2, 2018, as amended by that certain Fourth Amendment to Lease (Non-CPLV), dated as of
December 26, 2018, as amended by that certain Omnibus Amendment to Leases, dated as of June 1, 2020, as amended by that
certain Fifth Amendment to Lease (Non-CPLV), dated as of July 20, 2020, as amended by that certain Sixth Amendment to
Lease, dated as of September 30, 2020, and to the extent amended by that certain Amended and Restated Omnibus Amendment
to Leases, dated as of October 27, 2020 (collectively, as amended, the “Lease”), pursuant to which Landlord leases to Tenant, and
Tenant leases from Landlord, certain real property as more particularly described in the Lease;
WHEREAS, on the date hereof, (i) Bally’s Park Place LLC (“Operator”), as operator, Bally’s Atlantic City LLC, as
seller, and Premier Entertainment AC, LLC (as successor by assignment to Twin River Management Group, Inc.) (“Purchaser”),
as purchaser, are closing a purchase and sale transaction under that certain Agreement of Sale, dated as of April 24, 2020, with
respect to certain real property and (ii) Operator and Purchaser are closing a purchase and sale transaction under that certain
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2020, with respect to certain casino and related operations and assets, in each
case under clauses (i) and (ii), associated with the gaming and entertainment facility known as Bally’s Atlantic City (the
“Existing BAC Facility”), located in Atlantic City, New Jersey (the “Bally’s Transaction”), which Existing BAC Facility is (prior
to the effectiveness of this Amendment) subject to the Lease; and
WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the Landlord and Tenant have effectuated a subdivision of a portion of the real property
associated with the Existing BAC Facility, such that the portion thereof commonly known as the Wild Wild West Casino, Sports
Book and Bar as more specifically described on Annex B-1 attached hereto (the “Wild Wild West Parcel”) shall comprise a
separate legal parcel; and
WHEREAS, (i) the Wild Wild West Parcel, (ii) the parcel known as Block 488, Lot 23, as more specifically described on
Annex B-2 attached hereto (the “Block 488 Parcel”), and (iii)
the operations and related assets associated therewith (collectively, the “Retained Facility”) are not included in, and are not being
sold to Purchaser in connection with, the Bally’s Transaction; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Bally’s Transaction, the parties hereto desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound hereby, agree as follows:
1.
Definitions. Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein without definition shall
have the meanings applicable to such terms, respectively, as set forth in the Lease.
2.
Amendments to the Lease.
A. Termination of the Lease as to the Bally’s Facility. Effective as of the date hereof:
a.
b.
the Lease is hereby terminated with respect to the Bally’s Leased Property (as defined below), the Bally’s Leased
Property no longer constitutes Leased Property under the Lease, and neither Landlord nor Tenant has any further
liabilities or obligations, from and after the date of this Amendment, in respect of the Bally’s Facility (as defined
below) and the Bally’s Leased Property (provided that any such liabilities or obligations arising prior to such date
shall not be terminated, limited or affected by or upon entry into this Amendment), and
the Guaranty hereby automatically, and without further action by any party, ceases to apply with respect to any
Obligations (as defined in the Guaranty) with respect to the Bally’s Facility or the Bally’s Leased Property to the
extent arising from and after the date of this Amendment (provided that any such Obligations arising prior to such
date shall not be terminated, limited or affected by or upon entry into this Amendment).
c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Lease shall continue in full force and effect with respect to (i) the balance of (x)
the Facilities (other than the Bally’s Facility) and (y) the Leased Property (other than the Bally’s Leased Property),
and (ii) the Retained Facility and Retained Leased Property (as defined below). The term “Bally’s Facility” shall
refer to the applicable Facility identified as Facility 13 on the list of the Facilities annexed as Exhibit A to the
Lease (prior to giving effect to the replacement of said Exhibit A pursuant to Section 2.N.i. of this Amendment),
other than the portion thereof pertaining to the Retained Facility. The term “Bally’s Leased Property” shall refer to
the Leased Property set forth on Annex A hereto and any other Leased Property pertaining to the Bally’s Facility
(excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, the Retained Leased Property). The term “Retained Facility” shall have
the meaning given such term in the Recitals hereto.
2
The term “Retained Leased Property” shall refer to the Wild Wild West Parcel, the Block 488 Parcel and any other
Leased Property pertaining to the Retained Facility.
B. Wild Wild West. Boardwalk Regency LLC has obtained all Gaming Licenses necessary to continue the operations of the
Wild Wild West Parcel under Boardwalk Regency LLC’s Gaming Licenses for the Facility known as Caesars Atlantic
City, and all operations and related assets associated with the Retained Facility have been conveyed to Boardwalk
Regency LLC. The Wild Wild West Parcel will be operated by Boardwalk Regency LLC as part of the Facility known as
Caesars Atlantic City, which will include, but not be limited to, the Wild Wild West Parcel being operated under the
Caesars Atlantic City Gaming License, provided, for the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing shall not require Caesars
Atlantic City to constitute a Continuous Operation Facility.
C. Rent. Landlord and Tenant hereby expressly acknowledge and agree that there shall be no reduction in the Rent under the
Lease as a result of the removal of the Bally’s Facility from the Lease or otherwise as a result of the Bally’s Transaction.
D. Variable Rent.
1. From and after the date hereof, for purposes of any calculation of Variable Rent under the Lease, including any
adjustments in Variable Rent based on increases or decreases in Net Revenue, such calculations of Net Revenue shall
exclude Net Revenue attributable to the Bally’s Facility.
2. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of “Base Net Revenue Amount” is hereby deleted
and replaced with the following:
“‘Base Net Revenue Amount’: An amount equal to the arithmetic average of the following: (i) Three
Billion Three Hundred Ninety-One Million Five Hundred Fifty-Nine Thousand Twenty and No/100 Dollars
($3,391,559,020.00), which amount Landlord and Tenant agree represents Net Revenue for the Fiscal
Period immediately preceding the first (1st) Lease Year (i.e., the Fiscal Period ending September 30, 2017),
(ii) Three Billion Four Hundred One Million Three Hundred Ninety-Three Thousand Two Hundred Four
and No/100 Dollars ($3,401,393,204.00), which amount Landlord and Tenant agree represents the Net
Revenue for the Fiscal Period immediately preceding the end of the first (1st) Lease Year (i.e., the Fiscal
Period ending September 30, 2018) and (iii) Three Billion Two Hundred Sixty-Four Million Four Hundred
Thirty-Two Thousand Four Hundred Twenty and No/100 Dollars ($3,264,432,420.00), which amount
Landlord and Tenant agree represents the Net Revenue for the Fiscal Period immediately preceding the end
of the second (2nd) Lease Year (i.e., the Fiscal Period ending September 30, 2019). For the avoidance of
doubt, the term “arithmetic average” as used in this definition refers to the quotient obtained by dividing (x)
the sum of the amounts set forth in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) by (y) three (3).”
3
E. Annual Minimum Cap Ex Amount. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of “Annual
Minimum Cap Ex Amount” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference therein to “One Hundred Nineteen
Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($119,300,000.00)” with a reference to “One Hundred Fourteen
Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($114,500,000.00)”.
F. Annual Minimum Per-Lease B&I Cap Ex Requirement. The Annual Minimum Per-Lease B&I Cap Ex Requirement shall
be unchanged by this Amendment. Further, Landlord and Tenant hereby acknowledge, for the avoidance of doubt, that
the Net Revenue attributable to the Bally’s Facility during the period the Bally’s Facility was included in the Lease (i.e.,
during the period from the Commencement Date until the date of this Amendment) shall be included for purposes of
calculating the Capital Expenditures required under Section 10.5(a)(ii) of the Lease (i.e., the Annual Minimum Per-Lease
B&I Cap Ex Requirement).
G. Triennial Allocated Minimum Cap Ex Amount B Floor. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition
of “Triennial Allocated Minimum Cap Ex Amount B Floor” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference
therein to “Three Hundred Twenty-Seven Million Eight Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($327,800,000.00)” with
a reference to “Three Hundred Eleven Million and No/100 Dollars ($311,000,000.00)”.
H. Triennial Minimum Cap Ex Amount A. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of “Triennial
Minimum Cap Ex Amount A” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference therein to “Five Hundred Ninety
Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($590,300,000.00)” with a reference to “Five Hundred Sixty-Six
Million Seven Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($566,700,000.00)”.
I. Triennial Minimum Cap Ex Amount B. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of “Triennial
Minimum Cap Ex Amount B” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference therein to “Four Hundred Twenty-
One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a reference to “Four Hundred Five
Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)”.
J. Partial Periods.
3. Section 10.5(a)(v)(b) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein to “Five Hundred Ninety
Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($590,300,000.00)” with a reference to “Five Hundred
Sixty-Six Million Seven Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($566,700,000.00)” and (b) replace the reference
therein to “One Hundred Ninety-Six Million Seven Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and
67/100 Dollars ($196,766,666.67)” with a reference to “One Hundred Eighty-Eight Million Nine Hundred
Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($188,900,000.00)”,
4
4. Section 10.5(a)(v)(c) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein to “Four Hundred
Twenty-One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a reference to “Four
Hundred Five Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)” and (b) replace the
reference therein to “One Hundred Forty Million Six Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-
Three and 33/100 Dollars ($140,633,333.33)” with a reference to “One Hundred Thirty-Five Million Sixty-Six
Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($135,066,666.67)”, and
5. The second sentence of Section 10.5(a)(v) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein to
“Five Hundred Ninety Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($590,300,000.00)” with a reference
to “Five Hundred Sixty-Six Million Seven Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($566,700,000.00)”, (b)
replace the reference therein to “One Hundred Ninety-Six Million Seven Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Six
Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($196,766,666.67)” with a reference to “One Hundred Eighty-Eight
Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($188,900,000.00)”, (c) replace the reference therein to
“Four Hundred Twenty-One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a
reference to “Four Hundred Five Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)” and (d)
replace the reference therein to “One Hundred Forty Million Six Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Three Hundred
Thirty-Three and 33/100 Dollars ($140,633,333.33)” with a reference to “One Hundred Thirty-Five Million Sixty-
Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($135,066,666.67)”.
K. Section 22.2(ix) Transfer.
6. Landlord and Tenant hereby acknowledge and agree that the Bally’s Transaction shall be deemed to be, and
treated as, a transfer and sale of the entire Leased Property with respect to a Facility pursuant to Section 22.2(ix)
of the Lease.
7. All of the applicable requirements and conditions set forth in Section 22.2(ix) of the Lease with respect to such
transfer and sale are deemed satisfied or waived by the execution of this Amendment and the consummation of
the closing of the Bally’s Transaction.
8. The 2018 Facility EBITDAR of Tenant for the Bally’s Facility is as set forth on Schedule C-2 annexed hereto.
9. The amounts of the 2018 EBITDAR Pool and 2018 EBITDAR Pool Before Fifth Amendment shall not be
reduced as a result of the Bally’s Facility no longer being a Facility under the Lease, and the removal of the
Bally’s Facility from the Lease shall not constitute a L1 Transfer or a L2 Transfer under the Lease.
5
10. The words, number and symbols “four and six-tenths percent (4.6%)” contained in Section 22.2(ix) of the Lease
are hereby deleted and replaced with the following: “two and seventy-three hundredths percent (2.73%)”.
11. For purposes of subsequent calculations of the L1/L2 EBITDAR to Rent Ratio under the Lease, the EBITDAR of
Tenant in respect of the Bally’s Facility shall be disregarded.
12. The treatment of the Bally’s Transaction hereunder is not intended to serve as a precedent for the treatment of
future dispositions (if any) which may be effectuated under Section 22.2(ix) of the Lease or otherwise.
L. PACE Reports. Clause (C) of Section 23.1(b)(i) of the Lease is hereby amended by replacing “(but only for the SPE
Tenants associated with the current Harrah’s Lake Tahoe, Harvey’s Lake Tahoe, Caesars Atlantic City and Bally’s
Atlantic City and Schiff Parcel property locations as set forth in Exhibit A)” with “(but only for the SPE Tenants
associated with the current Harrah’s Lake Tahoe, Harvey’s Lake Tahoe and Caesars Atlantic City property locations as set
forth in Exhibit A)”.
M. REA. Purchaser and Bally’s Atlantic City LLC (i.e., the Landlord entity which is the fee owner with respect to the
Retained Facility) have, on or about the date hereof, entered into a certain Reciprocal Easement Agreement (the “REA”)
affecting portions of the Retained Leased Property and portions of the real property formerly comprising the Bally’s
Leased Property, which REA is intended hereafter to be recorded. Tenant has participated together with Landlord in the
negotiation of, and hereby consents to, the REA. The REA shall be deemed to be a Property Document and a Permitted
Exception Document in each case for all purposes under the Lease.
N. Revisions to Exhibits and Schedules to the Lease. The Exhibits and Schedules to the Lease are hereby amended as
follows:
i. Facilities. Exhibit A annexed to the Lease (setting forth the list of Facilities under the Lease) is hereby replaced with
the replacement Exhibit A that is annexed hereto as Schedule C-1.
ii. Legal Description. The legal descriptions with respect to the Leased Property set forth on Exhibit B annexed to the
Lease are hereby amended such that the legal description with respect to the Leased Property pertaining to the
Existing BAC Facility as set forth on Annex A attached hereto is hereby deleted from said Exhibit B, and the legal
descriptions for the Wild Wild West Parcel and the Block 488 Parcel as set forth on Annex B-1 and Annex B-2,
respectively, shall be reinstated in said Exhibit B and included as part of the Leased Property pertaining to the Caesars
Atlantic City Facility.
iii. Property Specific IP. The list of Property Specific IP set forth on Exhibit H annexed to the Lease is hereby amended
such that:
6
(a) the following items of Property Specific IP listed thereon are hereby deleted from said Exhibit H:
Mark
Jurisdiction Brand
Specific/
Enterprise Property
Noodle Village
(logo)
New Jersey Bally’s
Specific
Studio
New Jersey Bally’s
Specific
Gold Tooth
Gerties
Mountain Bar
(and Logo)
New Jersey Bally’s
Specific
New Jersey Bally’s
Specific
Buck Wild
Arcade
United States
of America
Bally’s
Specific
Boardwalk
Cupcakes (logo)
United States
of America
Bally’s
Specific
Coyote Kate's
Slot Parlor
United States
of America
Bally’s
Specific
Wild, Wild West
Casino
United States
of America
Bally’s
Specific
$10,000
Pyramid
New Jersey Bally’s
Specific
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
Bally’s
Atlantic
City
App. No. App. Date Reg. No. Reg. Date Status
22733
3/30/2007 22733
3/30/2007 Registered
15289
7/14/1998 15289
7/14/1998 Registered
NA
12/5/2000 20,499
12/5/2000 Registered
NA
8/11/1997 14,809
8/11/1997 Registered
87/663083 10/27/2017 5504950 6/26/2018 Registered
86/422551 10/13/2014 4780684 7/28/2015 Registered
76/067657 6/9/2000
2523523 12/25/2001 Registered
75/106946 5/13/1996 2837537 5/4/2004 Registered
NA
2/26/1992 10,296
2/26/1992 Registered
(b) the following items of Property Specific IP are hereby added to said Exhibit H
7
Jurisdiction Brand
Specific/
Enterprise Property
New Jersey Caesars
Specific
New Jersey Caesars
Specific
Mark
Gold Tooth
Gerties
Mountain Bar
(and Logo)
Buck Wild
Arcade
United States
of America
Caesars
Specific
Boardwalk
Cupcakes (logo)
United States
of America
Caesars
Specific
Coyote Kate's
Slot Parlor
United States
of America
Caesars
Specific
Wild, Wild West
Casino
United States
of America
Caesars
Specific
$10,000
Pyramid
New Jersey Caesars
Specific
App. No. App. Date Reg. No. Reg. Date Status
NA
12/5/2000 20,499
12/5/2000 Registered
NA
8/11/1997 14,809
8/11/1997 Registered
87/663083 10/27/2017 5504950 6/26/2018 Registered
86/422551 10/13/2014 4780684 7/28/2015 Registered
76/067657 6/9/2000
2523523 12/25/2001 Registered
75/106946 5/13/1996 2837537 5/4/2004 Registered
NA
2/26/1992 10,296
2/26/1992 Registered
Caesars
Atlantic
City
Caesars
Atlantic
City
Caesars
Atlantic
City
Caesars
Atlantic
City
Caesars
Atlantic
City
Caesars
Atlantic
City
Caesars
Atlantic
City
iv. Description of Title Policies. The list of Title Policies set forth on Exhibit J annexed to the Lease is hereby amended
such that the reference thereon to the Title Policy relating solely to the Existing BAC Facility is hereby amended and
shall be deemed to refer only to the portions of such Title Policy (including as to the exceptions listed on Schedule B
thereto) that pertain to the Wild Wild West Parcel and the Block 488 Parcel.
v. Brands. The list of Brands set forth on Exhibit M annexed to the Lease is hereby amended such that “Bally’s” is
hereby deleted from said Exhibit M.
vi. Managed Facilities IP Trademarks. The list of Managed Facilities IP set forth on Exhibit P annexed to the Lease is
hereby amended such that “Bally’s Atlantic City” is hereby deleted from said Exhibit P.
vii. Tenant Entities. The list of entities comprising Tenant set forth on Schedule B annexed to the Lease shall be amended
such that Bally’s Park Place LLC shall be deleted from said Schedule B and Bally’s Park Place LLC shall no longer
be a Tenant under the Lease.
8
viii. Gaming Licenses. The list of Gaming Licenses set forth on Schedule 1 annexed to the Lease is hereby amended
such that (a) the Gaming Licenses bearing Unique IDs 294 and 446 relating to the Bally’s Facility are hereby deleted
from said Schedule 1, (b) the Gaming License of Boardwalk Regency LLC bearing Unique ID 447 is amended as set
forth below and (c) the following additional Gaming License of Boardwalk Regency LLC (not bearing a Unique ID)
is hereby added to Schedule 1:
Unique ID
Legal Entity Name
Boardwalk Regency
LLC
License
Category
Gaming
Type of License
Issuing Agency
State
Description of
License
Lottery License
State of NJ,
Lottery
Commission
New Jersey Lottery Terminals
for Caesars
Atlantic City and
Harrah’s Atlantic
City
447
Boardwalk Regency
LLC
Gaming
Casino License /
Sports Wagering
License
New Jersey Casino
Control
Commission
New Jersey Caesars Atlantic
City
ix. Maximum Fixed Rent Term. The schedule setting forth the Maximum Fixed Rent Term with respect to each Facility
set forth on Schedule 3 annexed to the Lease is hereby amended such that the reference to “Bally’s Atlantic City”
thereon is deleted (it being understood, for the avoidance of doubt, that the reference to “Caesars Atlantic City”
thereon shall be deemed to also include the Retained Facility).
x. Specified Subleases. The list of Specified Subleases set forth on Schedule 4 annexed to the Lease is hereby amended
such that (a) the Specified Subleases bearing Contract ID Nos. 8171, 8197, 8167, 14871, 8178, 8208, 8209, 8207 and
8215 and the six (6) additional Specified Subleases pertaining solely to the Bally’s Facility that do not have a
Contract ID No. are hereby deleted from said Schedule 4 and (b) the following Sublease is hereby added to said
Schedule 4:
9
Contract ID
Debtor(s)
Property
Name
Name of
Operation
Counterparty
Description
Contract Date
File Name
N/A
Boardwalk
Regency LLC
Caesars
Atlantic City
Guy's Bar-B-
Que Joint
GRF Enterprises,
LLC
RESTAURANT
LICENSE
AGREEMENT
12/22/2015
BAC Guy Fieri
BBQ Restaurant
License
Agreement Fully
Executed.pdf
xi. 2018 Facility EBITDAR. Schedule 11 annexed to the Lease (setting forth the 2018 Facility EBITDAR) is hereby
replaced with the replacement Schedule 11 that is annexed as Schedule C-2 hereto.
O. Corrections to Leased Property Legal Descriptions. The legal descriptions with respect to the Leased Property set
forth on Exhibit B annexed to the Lease are hereby amended such that the legal descriptions set forth on Annex C
attached hereto are hereby deleted from said Exhibit B (the “Released Missouri Property”). The Released Missouri
Property was released from the Lease prior to the date hereof.
P. Correction to Schedule of Permitted Property Sales. The list of properties set forth on Schedule 7 annexed to the
Lease is hereby amended such that the following properties listed thereon are hereby deleted from said Schedule 7:
Property
Owning Entity
Area
Street (# if
assigned)
formerly
Harrah’s
Louis
Miscellaneous
Land LLC
St.
Riverport
13971 Riverport
Drive
City
County
State
Zip
Property ID or
APN
Legal
Maryland Hts
St. Louis
Missouri
63043
11P540071
Harrah’s North
Kansas City
New Harrah’s
North Kansas
City LLC
7400 NE
Birmingham Rd
Randolph
MO
18-218-00-10-
001.00
Tract 2
3.
No Other Modification or Amendment to the Lease. The Lease shall remain in full force and effect except as
expressly amended or modified by this Amendment. From and after the date of this Amendment, all references in the
Lease to the “Lease” shall be deemed to refer to the Lease as amended by this Amendment.
4.
Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Amendment shall be construed according to and governed by the laws
of the jurisdiction(s) specified by the Lease without regard to its or their conflicts of law principles. The parties hereto
hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction located in such applicable jurisdiction
in connection with any proceeding arising out of or relating to this Amendment.
10
5.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by one or more of the parties hereto on any number of
separate counterparts, and all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same
instrument. Facsimile and/or .pdf signatures shall be deemed to be originals for all purposes.
6.
Effectiveness. This Amendment shall be effective, as of the date hereof, only upon execution and delivery by
each of the parties hereto.
7.
Miscellaneous. If any provision of this Amendment is adjudicated to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, in
whole or in part, it will be deemed omitted to that extent and all other provisions of this Amendment will remain in full
force and effect. Neither this Amendment nor any provision hereof may be changed, modified, waived, discharged or
terminated orally, but only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change,
modification, waiver, discharge or termination is sought. The paragraph headings and captions contained in this
Amendment are for convenience of reference only and in no event define, describe or limit the scope or intent of this
Amendment or any of the provisions or terms hereof. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and permitted assigns.
[Signature Page Follows]
11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their duly authorized
representatives, all as of the date hereof.
LANDLORD:
HORSESHOE COUNCIL BLUFFS LLC
HARRAH’S COUNCIL BLUFFS LLC
HARRAH’S METROPOLIS LLC
HORSESHOE SOUTHERN INDIANA LLC
NEW HORSESHOE HAMMOND LLC
NEW HARRAH’S NORTH KANSAS CITY LLC
GRAND BILOXI LLC
HORSESHOE TUNICA LLC
NEW TUNICA ROADHOUSE LLC
CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY LLC
BALLY’S ATLANTIC CITY LLC
HARRAH’S LAKE TAHOE LLC
HARVEY’S LAKE TAHOE LLC
HARRAH’S RENO LLC
BLUEGRASS DOWNS PROPERTY OWNER LLC
VEGAS DEVELOPMENT LLC
VEGAS OPERATING PROPERTY LLC
MISCELLANEOUS LAND LLC
PROPCO GULFPORT LLC
PHILADELPHIA PROPCO LLC
HARRAH’S ATLANTIC CITY LLC
NEW LAUGHLIN OWNER LLC
HARRAH’S NEW ORLEANS LLC
each, a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
HORSESHOE BOSSIER CITY PROP LLC
HARRAH’S BOSSIER CITY LLC
each, a Louisiana limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
[Signatures Continue on Following Pages]
[Signature Page to Seventh Amendment to Regional Lease]
[Signature Page to Seventh Amendment to Regional Lease]
TENANT:
CEOC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
HBR REALTY COMPANY LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
HARVEYS IOWA MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS RIVERBOAT/CASINO CRUISES LLC, an Illinois limited liability company,
CAESARS RIVERBOAT CASINO, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company,
ROMAN HOLDING COMPANY OF INDIANA LLC, an Indiana limited liability company,
HORSESHOE HAMMOND, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company,
HARRAH’S BOSSIER CITY INVESTMENT COMPANY, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company,
HARRAH’S NORTH KANSAS CITY LLC, a Missouri limited liability company,
GRAND CASINOS OF BILOXI, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company,
ROBINSON PROPERTY GROUP LLC, a Mississippi limited liability company,
TUNICA ROADHOUSE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
CAESARS NEW JERSEY LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company,
HARVEYS TAHOE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
PLAYERS BLUEGRASS DOWNS LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company,
CASINO COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, INC., an Indiana corporation,
HARVEYS BR MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Nevada corporation,
HARRAH’S LAUGHLIN, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
JAZZ CASINO COMPANY, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
HORSESHOE ENTERTAINMENT,
[Signature Page to Seventh Amendment to Regional Lease]
a Louisiana limited partnership
By: New Gaming Capital Partnership,
a Nevada limited partnership,
its general partner
By: Horseshoe GP, LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company,
its general partner
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC,
a New Jersey limited liability company
By: Caesars New Jersey LLC,
a New Jersey limited liability company,
its sole member
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
BALLY’S PARK PLACE LLC,
a New Jersey limited liability company
By: CEOC, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its sole member
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
HOLE IN THE WALL, LLC,
[Signature Page to Seventh Amendment to Regional Lease]
a Nevada limited liability company
By: CEOC, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its sole member
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA, LLC,
a Pennsylvania limited liability company
By: Harrah’s Chester Downs Investment Company, LLC,
its sole member
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
HARRAH’S ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC,
a New Jersey limited liability company
By: Caesars Resort Collection, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its sole member
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
[Signature Page to Seventh Amendment to Regional Lease]
Acknowledged and agreed, solely for the purposes of the penultimate paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease:
PROPCO TRS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
[Signature Page to Seventh Amendment to Regional Lease]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT OF GUARANTOR
The undersigned (“Guarantor”) hereby: (a) acknowledges receipt of the Seventh Amendment to Lease (the “Amendment”;
capitalized terms used herein without definition having the meanings set forth in the Amendment), dated as of November 18,
2020, by and among the entities listed on Schedule A attached thereto, as Landlord, and the entities listed on Schedule B attached
thereto, as Tenant and the other parties party thereto; (b) consents to the terms and execution thereof; (c) ratifies and reaffirms
Guarantor’s obligations to Landlord pursuant to the terms of that certain Guaranty of Lease, dated as of July 20, 2020 (the
“Guaranty”), by and between Guarantor and Landlord, and agrees that, except as expressly set forth in Section 2.A.ii. of the
Amendment, nothing in the Amendment in any way impairs or lessens the Guarantor’s obligations under the Guaranty; and (d)
acknowledges and agrees that the Guaranty is in full force and effect and is valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with its
terms.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Acknowledgment and Agreement of Guarantor to be duly executed
as of November 18, 2020.
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
[Signature Page to Acknowledgment and Agreement of Guarantor]
Horseshoe Council Bluffs LLC
Harrah’s Council Bluffs LLC
Harrah’s Metropolis LLC
Horseshoe Southern Indiana LLC
New Horseshoe Hammond LLC
Horseshoe Bossier City Prop LLC
Harrah’s Bossier City LLC
New Harrah’s North Kansas City LLC
Grand Biloxi LLC
Horseshoe Tunica LLC
New Tunica Roadhouse LLC
Caesars Atlantic City LLC
Bally’s Atlantic City LLC
Harrah’s Lake Tahoe LLC
Harvey’s Lake Tahoe LLC
Harrah’s Reno LLC
Bluegrass Downs Property Owner LLC
Vegas Development LLC
Vegas Operating Property LLC
Miscellaneous Land LLC
Propco Gulfport LLC
Philadelphia Propco LLC
Harrah’s Atlantic City LLC
New Laughlin Owner LLC
Harrah’s New Orleans LLC
Schedule A
LANDLORD ENTITIES
Schedule A
CEOC, LLC, successor in interest by merger to Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.
Schedule B
TENANT ENTITIES
HBR Realty Company LLC
Harveys Iowa Management Company LLC
Southern Illinois Riverboat/Casino Cruises LLC
Caesars Riverboat Casino LLC
Roman Holding Company of Indiana LLC
Horseshoe Hammond, LLC
Horseshoe Entertainment
Harrah’s Bossier City Investment Company, LLC
Harrah’s North Kansas City LLC
Grand Casinos of Biloxi, LLC
Robinson Property Group LLC
Tunica Roadhouse LLC
Boardwalk Regency LLC
Caesars New Jersey LLC
Bally’s Park Place LLC
Harveys Tahoe Management Company LLC
Players Bluegrass Downs LLC
Casino Computer Programming, Inc.
Harveys BR Management Company, Inc.
Hole in the Wall, LLC
Chester Downs and Marina, LLC
Harrah’s Atlantic City Operating Company, LLC
Harrah’s Laughlin, LLC
Jazz Casino Company, L.L.C.
Schedule B
Schedule C-1
NEW EXHIBIT A
[attached]
Schedule C-1
EXHIBIT A
FACILITIES
No.
1.
Property
Horseshoe Council Bluffs
State
Iowa
2.
Harrah’s Council Bluffs
Iowa
Fee Owner
Horseshoe Council Bluffs
LLC
Operating Entity
HBR Realty Company LLC
Harveys BR Management
Company, Inc.
Harrah's Council Bluffs
LLC
Harveys Iowa Management
Company LLC
Harrah’s Metropolis
Illinois
Harrah's Metropolis LLC
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest by merger to
Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
Southern Illinois
Riverboat/Casino Cruises
LLC
Horseshoe Southern Indiana
(now known as Caesars
Southern Indiana)
Indiana
Horseshoe Southern Indiana
LLC
Caesars Riverboat Casino,
LLC
Horseshoe Hammond
Indiana
Horseshoe Bossier City
Louisiana
Harrah’s Bossier City
(Louisiana Downs)
Louisiana
8.
Harrah’s North Kansas City
Missouri
New Horseshoe Hammond
LLC
Horseshoe Bossier City
Prop LLC
Harrah's Bossier City LLC
New Harrah's North Kansas
City LLC
Roman Holding Company
of Indiana LLC
Horseshoe Hammond, LLC
Horseshoe Entertainment
Harrah's Bossier City
Investment Company,
L.L.C.
Harrah’s North Kansas City
LLC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Schedule C-1
9.
10.
11.
12.
Harrah’s Gulf Coast
(formerly known as Grand
Biloxi Casino Hotel) and
Biloxi Land
Mississippi
Grand Biloxi LLC
Horseshoe Tunica
Mississippi and Arkansas
Horseshoe Tunica LLC
Tunica Roadhouse
Mississippi
New Tunica Roadhouse
LLC
Grand Casinos of Biloxi,
LLC
Casino Computer
Programming, Inc.
Robinson Property Group
LLC
Tunica Roadhouse LLC
Caesars Atlantic City
(includes Wild Wild West
and Block 488 Parcel)
New Jersey
Caesars Atlantic City LLC
Boardwalk Regency LLC
Bally's Atlantic City LLC
Caesars New Jersey LLC
13.
Harrah’s Lake Tahoe
Nevada
Harrah's Lake Tahoe LLC Harveys Tahoe Management
Company LLC
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest by merger to
Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
Harvey’s Lake Tahoe
Nevada and California
Harvey's Lake Tahoe LLC Harveys Tahoe Management
14.
15.
Reno Billboard Parcel
Nevada
Harrah's Reno LLC
Company LLC
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest by merger to
Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
Players Bluegrass Downs
LLC
16.
Bluegrass Downs
Kentucky
Bluegrass Downs Property
Owner LLC
Schedule C-1
17.
Las Vegas Land
Assemblage Properties
Nevada
Vegas Development LLC
Hole in the Wall, LLC
18.
Harrah’s Airplane Hangar
Nevada
Vegas Operating Property
LLC
20.
21.
22.
Land Leftover from
Harrah’s Gulfport
Mississippi
Propco Gulfport LLC
Vacant Land in Splendora,
TX
Vacant Land at Turfway
Park
Texas
Miscellaneous Land LLC
Kentucky
Miscellaneous Land LLC
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest
to
Caesars
Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
by merger
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest by merger to
Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest by merger to
Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest by merger to
Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
CEOC, LLC, successor in
interest by merger to
Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc.
23.
Harrah’s Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
Philadelphia Propco LLC Chester Downs and Marina,
LLC
Schedule C-1
24.
25.
26.
Harrah’s Atlantic City
New Jersey
Harrah’s Atlantic City LLC
Harrah’s Laughlin
Harrah’s New Orleans
Nevada
Louisiana
New Laughlin Owner LLC
Harrah’s New Orleans LLC
Harrah’s Atlantic City
Operating Company, LLC
Harrah’s Laughlin, LLC
Jazz Casino Company,
L.L.C.
Schedule C-1
Schedule C-2
NEW SCHEDULE 11
[attached]
Schedule C-2
Annex A
Bally’s Leased Property
Bally’s Park Place Hotel
ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING IN THE
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF POP LLOYD BOULEVARD (74.00' WIDE) AND
THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE (50.00' WIDE) AND EXTENDING FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT;
THENCE
1. NORTH 62° 32' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF POP LLOYD BOULEVARD A DISTANCE
OF 402.35' TO A POINT; THENCE
2. NORTH 27° 28' 00" WEST PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 84.00' TO THE NORTH LINE
OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 44; THENCE
3. NORTH 62° 32' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.60' TO THE WEST LINE OF PARK PLACE (60.00' WIDE); THENCE
4. SOUTH 27° 28' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 615.31' TO A POINT IN THE CURVED
INTERIOR LINE OF PARK; THENCE
5. SOUTHWESTWARDLY IN AND ALONG SAME AND CURVING TO THE LEFT ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCLE
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1679.20' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 20.05' TO A POINT OF TANGENCY IN SAME; THENCE
6. SOUTH 73° 42' 26.6" WEST STILL IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 538.51' TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF
MICHIGAN AVENUE; THENCE
7. NORTH 27° 28' 00" WEST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 422.95' TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING.
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE (950 FEET WIDE) DISTANT 715.20 FEET
AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC
AVENUE (60 FEET WIDE) THENCE FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT;
1. EASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE, 59.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
Annex A
2. SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVENUE, 33.00 FEET TO A DRILL HOLE; THENCE
3. EASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE, 76.85 FEET TO A NAIL; THENCE
4. SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVENUE, 21.12 FEET TO A NAIL; THENCE
5. EASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE, 66.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS DISTANT 150 FEET
WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF OHIO AVENUE (50 FEET WIDE); THENCE
6. SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVENUE, 1230.68 FEET TO THE EXTERIOR LINE IN THE ATLANTIC
OCEAN ESTABLISHED BY THE RIPARIAN COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY; THENCE
7. WESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE, IN AND ALONG SAID EXTERIOR LINE, 202.35 FEET TO THE
EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE IF SAME WERE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY; THENCE
8. NORTHERLY, IN AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE, IF EXTENDED, 1284.80 FEET TO
THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING
Together with the beneficial easement rights as set forth in Access and Parking Agreement recorded in VOL 13723
CFN#201412082.
Together with the beneficial easement rights as set forth in Easement Agreement Recorded in VOL 13724 CFN #2014012083.
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: KNOWN AS LOTS 1 & 3 IN BLOCK 45 AND LOT 4 IN BLOCK 44 AS SHOWN
ON THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX MAP
Boardwalk Parcel
ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT, PARCEL AND LOT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATE IN THE CITY OF
ATLANTIC CITY, COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE (50 FEET WIDE) DISTANT 715.20 FEET
AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC
AVENUE (60 FEET WIDE) THENCE FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT;
1. NORTH 62 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE, 59.50 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE
Annex A
2. SOUTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVENUE, 33.00 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE
3. NORTH 62 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE, 76.85 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE
4. SOUTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVENUE, 21.12 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE
5. NORTH 62 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE, 66.00 FEET;
THENCE
6. SOUTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF
1230.68 FEET TO A POINT IN THE RIPARIAN COMMISSIONERS LINE 2000 FEET SOUTH OF PACIFIC AVENUE;
THENCE
7. SOUTH 62 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 202.35 FEET TO
A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE IF EXTENDED; THENCE
8. NORTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 1284.80 FEET
TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
Together with the beneficial easement rights as set forth in Access and Parking Agreement recorded in VOL 13723
CFN#201412082.
Together with the beneficial easement rights as set forth in Easement Agreement Recorded in VOL 13724 CFN #2014012083.
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: KNOWN AS LOTS 5 IN BLOCK 45 AS SHOWN ON THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX
MAP. NOTE: Lands lying waterward of the Interior Line of the Public Park are assessed to the City of Atlantic City as Tax Lot
98 Block 1)
Bally’s Park Place Garage
ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING IN THE
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC AVENUE (60.00' WIDE) AND THE
EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE (50.00' WIDE) AND EXTENDING FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT;
THENCE
1. NORTH 62° 32' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 352.35'
TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF OHIO AVENUE (50.00' WIDE); THENCE
Annex A
2. SOUTH 27° 28' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 360.00' TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE
OF POP LLOYD BOULEVARD (74.00' WIDE); THENCE
3. SOUTH 62° 32' 00" WEST PARALLEL IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 352.35' TO THE EASTERLY LINE
OF MICHIGAN AVENUE; THENCE
4. NORTH 27° 28' 00" WEST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 360.00' TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING.
Together with the beneficial easement rights as set forth in Access and Parking Agreement recorded in VOL 13723
CFN#201412082.
Together with the beneficial easement rights as set forth in Easement Agreement Recorded in VOL 13724 CFN #2014012083.
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: KNOWN AS LOT 1 IN BLOCK 43 AS SHOWN ON THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX
MAP
Wild West Casino
ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING IN THE
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC AVENUE (60.00' WIDE) AND THE
EASTERLY LINE OF ARKANSAS AVENUE (50.00' WIDE) AND EXTENDING FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT;
THENCE
1. NORTH 62° 32' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 350.00'
TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE (50.00' WIDE); THENCE
2. SOUTH 27° 28' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 847.08' TO A POINT IN THE INTERIOR LINE
OF PARK; THENCE
3. SOUTH 73° 42' 27" WEST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 332.25' TO A POINT OF CURVATURE IN SAME;
THENCE
4. STILL IN AND ALONG SAME AND CURVING TO THE LEFT ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCLE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1259.09' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.86' TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF ARKANSAS AVENUE; THENCE
5. NORTH 27° 28' 00" WEST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 105.00' TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT
4.01 IN BLOCK 43; THENCE
Annex A
6. NORTH 62° 32' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG SAME, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 200.00'
TO A POINT; THENCE
7. NORTH 27° 28' 00" WEST PARALLEL WITH ARKANSAS AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 173.19' TO A POINT; THENCE
8. SOUTH 62° 32' 00" WEST PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 12.50' TO A POINT; THENCE
9. NORTH 27° 28' 00" WEST PARALLEL WITH ARKANSAS AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 50.00' TO A POINT; THENCE
10. SOUTH 62° 32' 00" WEST PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 187.50' TO THE WESTERLY
LINE OF ARKANSAS AVENUE; THENCE
11. NORTH 27° 28' 00" WEST IN AND ALONG SAME A DISTANCE OF 450.00' TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING.
Together with the beneficial easement rights as set forth in Declaration of Cross Easements recorded in Deed Book 6619, page
86.
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: KNOWN AS LOT 1 IN BLOCK 42 AS SHOWN ON THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX
MAP.
Hummock Avenue Parcel
ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING IN THE
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH LINE OF HUMMOCK AVENUE (50.00' WIDE) A DISTANCE OF 252.76' SOUTHWEST OF
OHIO AVENUE (50.00' WIDE) AND EXTENDING; THENCE
1. NORTH 62° 32' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF HUMMOCK AVENUE A DISTANCE OF
69.76' TO A POINT; THENCE
2. SOUTH 27° 28' 00" EAST PARALLEL WITH OHIO AVENUE AND AT RIGHT ANGLES TO HUMMOCK AVENUE A
DISTANCE OF 121.00' TO A POINT; THENCE
3. SOUTH 62° 32' 00" WEST PARALLEL WITH HUMMOCK AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 3.53' TO A POINT DISTANT
152.00' NORTHEAST OF BACHARACH BOULEVARD; THENCE
4. NORTH 76° 40' 59" WEST PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 15.44 TO A POINT;
THENCE
Annex A
5. SOUTH 13° 19' 00" WEST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 76.00' TO A
POINT; THENCE
6. NORTH 76° 40' 59" WEST PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 10.00' TO A POINT;
THENCE
7. NORTH 13° 19' 00" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 76.00' TO A
POINT; THENCE
8. NORTH 76° 40' 59" WEST PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 103.50' TO A POINT;
THENCE
9. NORTH 12° 59' 55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 48.57' TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF HUMMOCK AVENUE AND THE
POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS WITH OTHERS OVER THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED RIGHT OF WAY:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHEAST LINE OF BACHARACH BLVD. (70 FEET WIDE) DISTANT 570.5 FEET
SOUTHEAST OF ARKANSAS AVENUE (60 FEET WIDE) AND EXTENDING THENCE:
1. NORTHEASTWARDLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BLVD. 152 FEET; THENCE
2. SOUTHEASTWARDLY PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BLVD. 20 FEET; THENCE
3. SOUTHWESTWARDLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BLVD 152 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST LINE OF
BACHARACH BLVD.; THENCE
4. NORTHWESTWARDLY IN AND ALONG BACHARACH BLVD 20 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING.
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: BEING KNOWN AS LOTS 20, 21 & 22 IN BLOCK 488 OF THE ATLANTIC
CITY TAX MAP
TRACT I:
Air Rights Over Michigan Avenue
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE (50.00 WIDE), SAID POINT BEING
DISTANT 239.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC AVENUE (60.00 FEET WIDE), AND
EXTENDING; THENCE
Annex A
1. NORTH 62 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE AND CROSSING
MICHIGAN AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE; THENCE
2. SOUTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST IN AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN
AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE
3. SOUTH 62 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH PACIFIC AVENUE AND CROSSING
MICHIGAN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE; THENCE
4. NORTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST IN AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN
AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
BEING AN AREA ABOVE THE HORIZONTAL PLACE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE BETWEEN ELEVATION 46.00 FEET
AND ELEVATION 46.00 FEET 6 INCHES SAID ELEVATIONS IN REFERENCE TO U.S.C. AND G.S. DATUM
(ELEVATION 0.00 =MEAN SEA LEVEL)
FOR INFORMATION ONLY: BEING KNOWN AS KNOWN AS LOT 6 IN BLOCK 42 OF THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX MAP
TRACT II
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE (50.00 WIDE) SAID POINT BEING
DISTANT 503.17 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC AVENUE (60.00 FEET WIDE) AND
EXTENDING FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT; THENCE
1. SOUTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES EAST IN AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE, A
DISTANCE OF 27.16 FEET; THENCE
2. SOUTH 39 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, CROSSING MICHIGAN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 54.32
FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE; THENCE
3. NORTH 27 DEGREES 28 MINUTES WEST IN AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE, A
DISTANCE OF 27.16 FEET; THENCE
4. NORTH 39 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, CROSSING MICHIGAN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 54.32
FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF MICHIGAN AVENUE; THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
Annex A
THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED AIR RIGHTS WILL BE AT AN ELEVATION OF 20.00 N.G.V.D. DATUM (MEAN SEA
LEVEL= 0.00) AND THE TOP OF THE AIR RIGHTS WILL BE AT ELEVATION 46.00
FOR INFORMATION ONLY: BEING KNOWN AS KNOWN AS LOT 7 IN BLOCK 42 OF THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX MAP
Air Rights Over Ohio Avenue
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION for proposed air rights above Ohio Avenue required in conjunction with the Baily's -
Claridge Connection Project, situate in the City of Atlantic City, County of Atlantic and State of New Jersey being bounded and
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the easterly line of Ohio Avenue (50' wide), South 27 degrees, 28 minutes, 00 seconds East 350.00'
from the southerly line of Pacific Avenue (60' wide), and extending from said beginning point; thence
1. South 27 degrees 28 minutes 00 seconds East in and along the easterly line of Ohio Avenue 10.00’ to the northerly line of
Pop Lloyd Boulevard (74’ wide); thence
2. South 62 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West in and along same, parallel with Pacific Avenue 50.00’ to the westerly line of
Ohio Avenue; thence
3. North 27 degrees 28 minutes 00 seconds West in and along same, 10.00’ to a point; thence
4. North 62 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds East, parallel with Pacific Avenue 50.00 feet to the point and place of
BEGINNING.
The above described air rights are located a minimum of 14.00’ above the existing grade elevation of Ohio Avenue.
FOR INFORMATION ONLY: BEING KNOWN AS KNOWN AS LOT 4.02 IN BLOCK 44 OF THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX
MAP
AIR RIGHTS OVER POP LLOYD BOULEVARD AS SET FORTH IN CITY OF ATLANTIC ORDINANCE NO. 77 OF 1978
AND IN DEED BOOK 3442, PAGE 250.
FOR INFORMATION ONLY: BEING KNOWN AS KNOWN AS LOT 13 IN BLOCK 43 OF THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX
MAP
BEING ALSO KNOWN AS (REPORTED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY):
Block 42, Lot 1 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Annex A
Block 42, Lot 6 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 42, Lot 7 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 43, Lot 1 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 43, Lot 13 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 44, Lot 4 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 44, Lot 4.02 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 45, Lot 1 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 45, Lot 3 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 45, Lot 5 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Block 488, Lot 23 on the official tax map of the CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey
Annex A
Annex B-1
Wild Wild West Parcel
ALL that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land and premises situate, lying, and being in the City of Atlantic City, County of Atlantic,
and State of New Jersey, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the southeast line of Pacific Avenue (60.00’ wide) and the northeast line of Arkansas Avenue
(50.00’ wide) and extending from said beginning point; thence
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
North 62° 32’ 00” East in and along the southeast line of Pacific Avenue a distance of 154.00’ to a point in a proposed
subdivision line as shown on the below mentioned plan; thence
South 27° 28’ 00” East in and said line and parallel with Arkansas Avenue a distance of 288.00’ to a point in a second
proposed subdivision line as shown on the below mentioned plan; thence
North 62° 32’ 00” East in and along said line and parallel with of Pacific Avenue a distance of 196.00’ to a point in the
southwest line of Michigan Avenue (50.00’ wide); thence
South 27° 28’ 00” East in and said line a distance of 559.08’ to a point in the interior line of public park, also being the
northwest line of the Boardwalk R.O.W. (60.00’ wide); thence
South 73° 42’ 27” West in and along said line a distance of 332.25’ to a point of curvature in same; thence
Southwesterly still along said line and curving to the left along the arc of a circle having a radius of 1259.09’ an arc
distance of 24.47’ to the intersection of the aforesaid northeast line of Arkansas Avenue; thence
North 27° 28’ 00” West in and along said line a distance of 105.00’ to a point in the division line of lot 4.01; thence
North 62° 32’ 00” East in and along said line and parallel with of Pacific Avenue a distance of 200.00’ to a common
property corner of lot 4.01; thence
North 27° 28’ 00” West still in and along said division line and parallel with Arkansas a distance of 173.19’ to another
common property corner of lot 4.01; thence
(10)
South 62° 32’ 00” West still in and along said division line and parallel with Pacific Avenue a distance of 12.50’ to
another common property corner of lot 4.01; thence
Annex B-1
(11) North 27° 28’ 00” West still in and along said division line and parallel with Arkansas a distance of 50.00’ to another
common property corner
(12)
South 62° 32’ 00” West still in and along said division line and parallel with Pacific Avenue a distance of 187.50’ to a
point in the aforesaid northeast line of Arkansas Avenue; thence
(13) North 27° 28’ 00” West l in and along said line a distance of 450.00’ to the point and place of BEGINNING.
BEING known as a portion of lot 1, also being depicted as lot 1.05 in block 42 in the City of Atlantic City as shown on the below
mentioned plan
CONTAINING an area of 183,920.08 square feet
THIS legal description was prepared by Daniel J. Ponzio Sr. NJPLS and is composed in accordance with a minor subdivision
plan prepared by Arthur W. Ponzio Co. & Associates, Inc. dated 5/5/20 Project #35167
TOGETHER with the easements appurtenant to such land set forth in that certain Reciprocal Easement Agreement dated as of
November 18, 2020, by and between Premier Entertainment AC, LLC and Bally’s Atlantic City LLC and recorded in the Office
of the County Clerk of Atlantic County, New Jersey substantially concurrently with the execution of this Amendment.
Annex B-1
Annex B-2
Block 488 Parcel
ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING IN THE
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH LINE OF HUMMOCK AVENUE (50.00' WIDE) A DISTANCE OF 252.76' SOUTHWEST OF
OHIO AVENUE (50.00' WIDE) AND EXTENDING; THENCE
1. NORTH 62° 32' 00" EAST IN AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF HUMMOCK AVENUE A DISTANCE OF
69.76' TO A POINT; THENCE
2. SOUTH 27° 28' 00" EAST PARALLEL WITH OHIO AVENUE AND AT RIGHT ANGLES TO HUMMOCK AVENUE A
DISTANCE OF 121.00' TO A POINT; THENCE
3. SOUTH 62° 32' 00" WEST PARALLEL WITH HUMMOCK AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 3.53' TO A POINT DISTANT
152.00' NORTHEAST OF BACHARACH BOULEVARD; THENCE
4. NORTH 76° 40' 59" WEST PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 15.44 TO A POINT;
THENCE
5. SOUTH 13° 19' 00" WEST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 76.00' TO A
POINT; THENCE
6. NORTH 76° 40' 59" WEST PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 10.00' TO A POINT;
THENCE
7. NORTH 13° 19' 00" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 76.00' TO A
POINT; THENCE
8. NORTH 76° 40' 59" WEST PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 103.50' TO A POINT;
THENCE
9. NORTH 12° 59' 55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 48.57' TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF HUMMOCK AVENUE AND THE
POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS WITH OTHERS OVER THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED RIGHT OF WAY:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHEAST LINE OF BACHARACH BLVD. (70 FEET WIDE) DISTANT 570.5 FEET
SOUTHEAST OF ARKANSAS AVENUE (60 FEET WIDE) AND EXTENDING THENCE:
Annex B-2
1. NORTHEASTWARDLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BLVD. 152 FEET; THENCE
2. SOUTHEASTWARDLY PARALLEL WITH BACHARACH BLVD. 20 FEET; THENCE
3. SOUTHWESTWARDLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO BACHARACH BLVD 152 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST LINE OF
BACHARACH BLVD.; THENCE
4. NORTHWESTWARDLY IN AND ALONG BACHARACH BLVD 20 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING.
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: BEING KNOWN AS LOT 23 IN BLOCK 488 OF THE ATLANTIC CITY TAX
MAP.
Annex B-2
Annex C
Released Missouri Property
Vacant Land in Missouri
PARCEL NO. 1: A parcel of ground being all of Lot 1 of the "Resubdivision Plat of Riverport Tract 7", a subdivision recorded as Daily No.
1065, on June 23, 1994, in Plat Book 327, pages 89 through 92, St. Louis County Recorder’s Office, said parcel being more particularly
described as follows: Beginning at the most Southern corner of Lot 1, of said “Resubdivision Plat of Riverport Tract 7”, said corner being in
the Northeastern line of a Levee Easement recorded in Book 8351, page 1184, St. Louis County Recorder’s Office; thence North 23 degrees
10 minutes 00 seconds West 1291.20 feet along the Southwestern line of said Lot 1, and along the Northeastern line of said Levee Easement,
to an angle point therein; thence North 25 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East 250.00 feet along the Northwestern line of said Lot 1, being
also the Southeastern line of said Levee Easement, to the most Southwestern corner of a Drainage and Storm Water Easement recorded in
Book 8351 page 1187, St. Louis County Recorder’s Office; thence in a generally Northeastwardly direction, along the southeastern line of
said Drainage and Storm Water Easement and along the Northwestern line of said Lot 1, the following courses and distances: North 50
degrees 03 minutes 29 seconds East 262.30 feet, North 28 degrees 16 minutes 56 seconds East 222.78 feet to a point of curve; thence
Northeastwardly 246.83 feet along a curve to the right having a radius of 230.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 59 degrees 01 minute
32 seconds East 235.15 feet, to a point of tangency, in the Southern line of said Drainage and Storm Water Easement, and the Northern line of
said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 09 seconds East 464.11 feet along the Southern line of said Drainage and Storm Water
Easement, and the Northern line of said Lot 1, to the Northeastern corner of said Lot 1; thence South 23 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East
1521.93 feet along the Northeastern line of said Lot 1, being also the Southwestern line of Lot 2 of said “Resubdivision Plat of Riverport
Tract 7”, to the most Eastern corner of said Lot 1; thence South 66 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West 1273.47 feet along the Southeastern
line of said Lot 1, to its most Southern corner and the point of beginning.
PARCEL NO. 2: Non-Exclusive easements to use all private roadways as set forth in the First Revised and Restated Riverport Project Trust
Indenture recorded in Book 8191 page 380, as amended by instruments recorded in Book 8465 page 1068, Book 9013 page 1955, Book
10263 page 1872, Book 10694 page 1881, and Book 11104 page 991, Book 11304 page 1396, Book 11890 page 2353 and Book 15124 page
654 St. Louis County Records.
PARCEL NO. 3: Non-Exclusive easements, according to Infrastructure Easement Agreement recorded on July 22, 1994, in Book 10263 page
1910, St. Louis County Records.
PARCEL NO. 4: Easements (Levee Easement), according to instrument recorded on July 22, 1994, in Book 10263 page 1895 St. Louis
County Records.
PARCEL NO. 5: Non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable appurtenant easement for vehicle and pedestrian access, ingress and egress as set
forth in Book 10263 page 1926 and as amended in the Amended and Restated Roadway Easement Agreement recorded in Book 10694 page
1908.
TRACT 2:
Harrah’s North Kansas - CEOC
Annex C
All of Lots 1 through 33, both inclusive, and part of Lots 34 through 44, both inclusive, "PLAN OF RANDOLPH SUBDIVISION OF
EXHIBITS "B", "C", "E" AND "F"; Part of Lot 6, Block 38; Part of Lots 1 through 5, and All of Lot 6, Block 39, "PLAN OF RANDOLPH",
both being subdivisions in Randolph, Clay County, Missouri, together with vacated Third Street, vacated Locust Street, and the vacated
alleys lying therein, all being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, "PLAN OF RANDOLPH SUBDIVISION OF EXHIBITS "B", "C", "E", AND "F", said
corner being the intersection of the Southerly Right of Way line of the Norfolk & Southern Railroad (formerly Wabash Railroad) and the
West Right of Way line of Liberty Street, as both are now established; thence South 0 degrees 44 minutes 54 seconds West along the West
Right of Way line of said Liberty Street, a distance of 500.92 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 6, Block 39, "PLAN OF RANDOLPH";
thence South 80 degrees 48 minutes 37 seconds West, along the South line of said Lot 6 and the South line of Lot 5 of said Block 39, a
distance of 119.97 feet to a point on the Northerly Right of Way line of the Birmingham Drainage District as established by Condemnation
Case No. 7087 filed in the Circuit Court of Clay County; thence North 74 degrees 47 minutes 13 seconds West, along said Northerly Right of
Way line, a distance of 495.29 feet; thence Northerly continuing along said Northerly Right of Way line of the Birmingham Drainage District,
along a curve to the left, having an initial tangent bearing of North 72 degrees 34 minutes 03 seconds West, a radius of 672.93 feet, and a
central angle of 1 degree 25 minutes 20 seconds an arc distance of 16.70 feet to a point on the East Right of Way line of Interstate Highway
Route No. 435, as condemned by the State of Missouri in Case No. 33895 in the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, as set forth in the
Report of Commissioners filed for record December 30, 1966 under Document No. C-7308 in Book 917 at Page 600; thence North 2 degrees
17 minutes 24 seconds East, along said East Right of Way line, a distance of 286.87 feet to a point on the aforesaid Southerly Right of Way
line of the Norfolk & Southern Railroad (formerly the Wabash Railroad); thence North 80 degrees 48 minutes 37 seconds East along said
Southerly Right of Way line, a distance of 615.36 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Annex C
Exhibit 10.11
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of November 18, 2020, by and
among HARRAH’S JOLIET LANDCO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (together with its successors and assigns,
“Landlord”), DES PLAINES DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership (together with its
successors and assigns, “Tenant”) and, solely for the purposes of the last paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease (as defined
below), Propco TRS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Propco TRS”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Landlord, Tenant and, solely for the purposes of the last paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease, Propco TRS
are parties to that certain Lease (Joliet) dated as of October 6, 2017, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Lease
(Joliet), dated as of December 26, 2018, as amended by that certain Omnibus Amendment to Leases, dated as of June 1, 2020, as
amended by that certain Second Amendment to Lease (Joliet), dated as of July 20, 2020, as amended by that certain Third
Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 30, 2020, and to the extent amended by that certain Amended and Restated
Omnibus Amendment to Leases, dated as of October 27, 2020 (collectively, as amended, the “Lease”), pursuant to which
Landlord leases to Tenant, and Tenant leases from Landlord, certain real property as more particularly described in the Lease;
WHEREAS, on the date hereof, (i) Bally’s Park Place LLC (“Operator”), as operator, Bally’s Atlantic City LLC, as
seller, and Premier Entertainment AC, LLC (as successor by assignment to Twin River Management Group, Inc.) (“Purchaser”),
as purchaser, are closing a purchase and sale transaction under that certain Agreement of Sale, dated as of April 24, 2020, with
respect to certain real property and (ii) Operator and Purchaser are closing a purchase and sale transaction under that certain
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2020, with respect to certain casino and related operations and assets, in each
case under clauses (i) and (ii), associated with the gaming and entertainment facility known as Bally’s Atlantic City, located in
Atlantic City, New Jersey (the “Bally’s Transaction”); and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Bally’s Transaction, the parties hereto desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound hereby, agree as follows:
1.
Definitions
. Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings
applicable to such terms, respectively, as set forth in the Lease.
2.
Amendments to the Lease
.
a. Annual Minimum Cap Ex Amount. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of “Annual
Minimum Cap Ex Amount” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference therein to “One Hundred Nineteen
Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($119,300,000.00)” with a reference to “One Hundred Fourteen
Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($114,500,000.00)”.
b. Annual Minimum Per-Lease B&I Cap Ex Requirement. The Annual Minimum Per-Lease B&I Cap Ex Requirement
shall be unchanged by this Amendment. Further, Landlord and Tenant hereby acknowledge, for the avoidance of
doubt, that the Net Revenue attributable to the Bally’s Facility (as defined in the Seventh Amendment to the Regional
Lease being entered into concurrently with this Amendment) during the period the Bally’s Facility was included in the
Regional Lease (i.e., during the period from the “Commencement Date” (as defined in the Regional Lease) until the
date of this Amendment) shall be included for purposes of calculating the Capital Expenditures required under Section
10.5(a)(ii) of the Lease (i.e., the Annual Minimum Per-Lease B&I Cap Ex Requirement).
c. Triennial Allocated Minimum Cap Ex Amount B Floor. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the
definition of “Triennial Allocated Minimum Cap Ex Amount B Floor” is hereby revised and modified to replace the
reference therein to “Three Hundred Twenty-Seven Million Eight Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars
($327,800,000.00)” with a reference to “Three Hundred Eleven Million and No/100 Dollars ($311,000,000.00)”.
d. Triennial Minimum Cap Ex Amount A. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of
“Triennial Minimum Cap Ex Amount A” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference therein to “Five
Hundred Ninety Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($590,300,000.00)” with a reference to “Five
Hundred Sixty-Six Million Seven Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($566,700,000.00)”.
e. Triennial Minimum Cap Ex Amount B. Article II of the Lease is hereby amended such that the definition of “Triennial
Minimum Cap Ex Amount B” is hereby revised and modified to replace the reference therein to “Four Hundred
Twenty-One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a reference to “Four
Hundred Five Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)”.
f. Partial Periods.
2
i.
ii.
iii.
Section 10.5(a)(v)(b) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein to “Five Hundred
Ninety Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($590,300,000.00)” with a reference to “Five
Hundred Sixty-Six Million Seven Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($566,700,000.00)” and (b) replace
the reference therein to “One Hundred Ninety-Six Million Seven Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Six Hundred
Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($196,766,666.67)” with a reference to “One Hundred Eighty-Eight Million Nine
Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($188,900,000.00)”,
Section 10.5(a)(v)(c) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein to “Four Hundred
Twenty-One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($421,900,000.00)” with a reference to
“Four Hundred Five Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($405,200,000.00)” and (b) replace
the reference therein to “One Hundred Forty Million Six Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Three Hundred
Thirty-Three and 33/100 Dollars ($140,633,333.33)” with a reference to “One Hundred Thirty-Five Million
Sixty-Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($135,066,666.67)”, and
The second sentence of Section 10.5(a)(v) of the Lease is hereby amended to (a) replace the reference therein
to “Five Hundred Ninety Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($590,300,000.00)” with a
to “Five Hundred Sixty-Six Million Seven Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars
reference
($566,700,000.00)”, (b) replace the reference therein to “One Hundred Ninety-Six Million Seven Hundred
Sixty-Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars ($196,766,666.67)” with a reference to “One
Hundred Eighty-Eight Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($188,900,000.00)”, (c) replace
the reference therein to “Four Hundred Twenty-One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars
($421,900,000.00)” with a reference to “Four Hundred Five Million Two Hundred Thousand and No/100
Dollars ($405,200,000.00)” and (d) replace the reference therein to “One Hundred Forty Million Six Hundred
Thirty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Three and 33/100 Dollars ($140,633,333.33)” with a reference
to “One Hundred Thirty-Five Million Sixty-Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and 67/100 Dollars
($135,066,666.67)”.
g. Regional Lease Section 22.2(ix) Transfer.
i.
Landlord and Tenant hereby acknowledge and agree that the Bally’s Transaction shall be deemed to be, and
treated as, a transfer and sale of the entire “Leased Property” (as defined in the Regional Lease) with respect to
a “Facility” (as defined in the Regional Lease) pursuant to Section 22.2(ix) of the Regional Lease.
3
ii.
iii.
The 2018 Facility EBITDAR of Regional Tenant for the Bally’s Facility is as set forth on Schedule C-2
annexed to the Seventh Amendment to the Regional Lease.
The amount of the 2018 EBITDAR Pool shall not be reduced as a result of the Bally’s Facility no longer being
a Regional Facility under the Regional Lease, and the removal of the Bally’s Facility from the Regional Lease
shall not constitute a L1 Transfer or a L2 Transfer under the Regional Lease.
3.
No Other Modification or Amendment to the Lease
. The Lease shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly amended or modified by this Amendment.
From and after the date of this Amendment, all references in the Lease to the “Lease” shall be deemed to refer to the Lease as
amended by this Amendment.
4.
Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Amendment shall be construed according to and governed by the laws
of the jurisdiction(s) specified by the Lease without regard to its or their conflicts of law principles. The parties hereto
hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction located in such applicable jurisdiction
in connection with any proceeding arising out of or relating to this Amendment.
5.
Counterparts
. This Amendment may be executed by one or more of the parties hereto on any number of separate counterparts,
and all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile and/or .pdf
signatures shall be deemed to be originals for all purposes.
6.
Effectiveness
. This Amendment shall be effective, as of the date hereof, only upon execution and delivery by each of the parties hereto.
7.
Miscellaneous. If any provision of this Amendment is adjudicated to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, in
whole or in part, it will be deemed omitted to that extent and all other provisions of this Amendment will remain in full
force and effect. Neither this Amendment nor any provision hereof may be changed, modified, waived, discharged or
terminated orally, but only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change,
modification, waiver, discharge or termination is sought. The paragraph headings and captions contained in this
Amendment are for convenience of reference only and in no event define, describe or limit the scope or intent of this
Amendment or any of the provisions or terms hereof. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and permitted assigns.
[Signature Page Follows]
4
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their duly authorized
representatives, all as of the date hereof.
LANDLORD:
HARRAH’S JOLIET LANDCO LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske__________________
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
TENANT:
[Signatures Continue on Following Pages]
[Signature Page to Fourth Amendment to Joliet Lease]
DES PLAINES DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: Harrah’s Illinois LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company,
its general partner
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
Acknowledged and agreed, solely for the purposes of the last paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Lease:
[Signatures Continue on Following Pages]
[Signature Page to Fourth Amendment to Joliet Lease]
PROPCO TRS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ David Kieske__________________
Name: David Kieske
Title: Treasurer
CEOC, LLC hereby acknowledges this Amendment and reaffirms its joinder attached to the Lease.
[Signatures Continue on Following Pages]
[Signature Page to Fourth Amendment to Joliet Lease]
CEOC, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
[Signature Page to Fourth Amendment to Joliet Lease]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT OF GUARANTOR
The undersigned (“Guarantor”) hereby: (a) acknowledges receipt of the Fourth Amendment to Lease (the “Amendment”; capitalized terms
used herein without definition having the meanings set forth in the Amendment), dated as of November 18, 2020, by and among Harrah’s
Joliet Landco LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Landlord, Des Plaines Development Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
partnership, as Tenant, and the other parties party thereto; (b) consents to the terms and execution thereof; (c) ratifies and reaffirms
Guarantor’s obligations to Landlord pursuant to the terms of that certain Guaranty of Lease, dated as of July 20, 2020 (the “Guaranty”), by
and between Guarantor and Landlord, and agrees that nothing in the Amendment in any way impairs or lessens the Guarantor’s obligations
under the Guaranty; and (d) acknowledges and agrees that the Guaranty is in full force and effect and is valid, binding and enforceable in
accordance with its terms.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Acknowledgment and Agreement of Guarantor to be duly executed as of
November 18, 2020.
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
By: /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Name: Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
Title: Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
[Signature Page to Acknowledgment and Agreement of Guarantor]
Exhibit 10.53
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
This RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), is made as of the 20 day of
August 2020 (the “Grant Date”) between Caesars Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
[_________] (the “Participant”), and is made pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Amended & Restated 2015 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
th
Section 1.
Restricted Stock Units
. The Company hereby issues to the Participant, as of the Grant Date, [____] restricted stock units (the “RSUs”),
subject to such vesting, transfer and other restrictions and conditions as set forth in this Agreement (the “Award”). Each RSU
represents the right to receive the Fair Market Value of one Share, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement
and the Plan.
Section 2.
Vesting Requirements.
(a)
Generally. Except as otherwise provided herein, the RSUs shall vest and become non-forfeitable in
equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the Grant Date (each, a “Vesting Date”), subject to the Participant’s
continuous service or employment with the Company and its Affiliates (“Service”) from the Grant Date through the
applicable Vesting Date.
(b)
Change in Control. If the Participant receives a Replacement Award in respect of the RSUs (the
“Replacement Units”) upon a Change in Control that occurs prior to the final Vesting Date, then the unvested RSUs will
not vest upon such Change in Control and such Replacement Units shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting
schedule set forth in Section 2(a) above and continue to be subject to the terms of the Plan and this Agreement. If,
however, upon a Change in Control the Participant does not receive a Replacement Award in respect of the RSUs, then
any RSUs that are unvested and held by the Participant as of immediately prior to the Change in Control shall vest as of
immediately prior to the Change in Control (the “CIC Vested Awards”), and will be treated in accordance with Section
12(b) of the Plan, subject to the Participant’s continuous Service through the Change in Control.
(c)
Termination of Service without Cause, for Good Reason, or due to Death or Disability (other than
During the 24-Month Period Immediately Following a Change in Control). Notwithstanding Section 2(a) or Section 2(b)
hereof, in the event of the Participant’s termination of Service (i) by the Company and its Affiliates without Cause, (ii) to
the extent that the Participant is party to an employment agreement as of the date of termination that provides for “good
reason” protection, by the Participant for “Good Reason” or (iii) due to the Participant’s death or Disability, in each case,
at any time other
DEPTS.00106
than during the 24-month period immediately following a Change in Control, then the Participant will vest in a pro rata
portion of the Restricted Stock Units, determined by multiplying the number of Restricted Stock Units that would have
otherwise vested on the next-scheduled Vesting Date following the date of termination (the “Termination Date”) by a
fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days that the Participant provided continuous Service from the most
recent Vesting Date through the Termination Date (or, if no Vesting Date has occurred, from the Grant Date through the
Termination Date), and the denominator of which is 365. Any Restricted Stock Units that do not become vested pursuant
to the immediately-preceding sentence shall immediately be forfeited and cancelled, and the Participant shall not be
entitled to any compensation or other amount with respect thereto. For purposes of this Section 2(c), “Good Reason” shall
have the meaning (if any) set forth in the Participant’s employment agreement in effect as of the Termination Date, if
applicable.
(d)
Termination of Service without Cause, for Good Reason, or due to Death or Disability during the 24-
Month Period Immediately Following a Change in Control. Notwithstanding Sections 2(a)-(c) hereof, in the event of the
Participant’s termination of Service by the Company and its Affiliates without Cause, by the Participant for Good
Reason, or due to the Participant’s death or Disability, in each case, within the 24-month period immediately following a
Change in Control, then 100% of any then unvested Replacement Units shall immediately become fully vested and non-
forfeitable on the Termination Date. For purposes of this Section 2(d), “Good Reason” shall have the meaning set forth in
the Plan.
(e)
Other Terminations of Service. Upon the occurrence of a termination of the Participant’s Service for
any reason other than as provided for by Section 2(c) or 2(d) hereof, all outstanding and unvested RSUs shall immediately
be forfeited and cancelled, and the Participant shall not be entitled to any compensation or other amount with respect
thereto. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, upon a termination of the Participant’s Service for Cause, all
RSUs, whether vested or unvested, shall immediately be forfeited and cancelled, and the Participant shall not be entitled
to any compensation or other amount with respect thereto.
Section 3.
Settlement
. As soon as reasonably practicable following the applicable Vesting Date, Termination Date, or the occurrence of
a Change in Control where no Replacement Award has been provided, as applicable (and in any event within 10 days following
the applicable Vesting Date, Termination Date, or the occurrence of such Change in Control, as applicable), any RSUs that
become vested and non-forfeitable shall be paid, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, by the Company delivering to
the Participant a number of Shares equal to the number of RSUs that vested and became non-forfeitable pursuant to Section 2
hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Participant is subject to a trading blackout on the Vesting Date, Termination Date, or
the occurrence of such Change in Control, as applicable, then the applicable RSUs shall instead be settled and paid as soon as
reasonably practicable (and in any
2
th
event within 10 days) following the date on which the trading blackout is no longer applicable (but in no event later than March
15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Vesting Date, Termination Date, or the occurrence of such
Change in Control, as applicable, occurs).
Section 4.
Restrictions on Transfer
. No RSUs (nor any interest therein) may be sold, assigned, alienated, pledged, attached or otherwise transferred or
encumbered by the Participant otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and any such purported sale,
assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, transfer or encumbrance shall be void and unenforceable against the Company or any
Affiliate; provided that the designation of a beneficiary shall not constitute a sale, assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment,
transfer or encumbrance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the discretion of the Committee, RSUs may be transferred by the
Participant solely to the Participant’s spouse, siblings, parents, children and grandchildren or trusts for the benefit of such persons
or partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies or other entities owned solely by such persons, including, but not
limited to, trusts for such persons.
Section 5.
Investment Representation
. The Participant is acquiring the RSUs for investment purposes only and not with a view to, or in connection with,
the public distribution thereof in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). No Shares shall be
acquired unless and until the Company and/or the Participant shall have complied with all applicable federal or state registration,
listing and/or qualification requirements and all other requirements of law or of any regulatory agencies having jurisdiction,
unless the Committee has received evidence satisfactory to it that the Participant may acquire such shares pursuant to an
exemption from registration under the applicable securities laws. The Participant understands and agrees that none of the RSUs
may be offered, sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of except in compliance with this
Agreement and the Securities Act pursuant to an effective registration statement or applicable exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities or “blue sky” laws. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
contrary, the Company shall have no obligation to deliver any Shares hereunder or make any other distribution of benefits under
hereunder unless such delivery or distribution would comply with all applicable laws (including, without limitation, the Securities
Act), and the applicable requirements of any securities exchange or similar entity.
Section 6.
Adjustments
. The Award granted hereunder shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(b) of the Plan.
Section 7.
No Right of Continued Service
. Nothing in the Plan or this Agreement shall confer upon the Participant any right to continued Service with the
Company or any Affiliate.
3
Section 8.
Tax Withholding
. The Award shall be subject to tax and/or other withholding in accordance with Section 15(e) of the Plan.
Section 9.
No Rights as a Stockholder; Dividends
. The Participant shall not have any privileges of a stockholder of the Company with respect to any RSUs,
including without limitation any right to vote any Shares underlying such RSUs or to receive dividends or other distributions in
respect thereof, unless and until Shares underlying the RSUs are delivered to the Participant in accordance with Section 3 hereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any dividends payable with respect to the RSUs underlying the Award during the period from the
Grant Date through the date the applicable RSUs are settled in accordance with Section 3 hereof will accumulate in cash and be
payable to the Participant on a deferred basis, but only to the extent that the Award vests in accordance with Section 2 hereof. In
no event shall the Participant be entitled to any payments relating to dividends paid after the earlier to occur of the settlement or
forfeiture of the applicable RSUs underlying the Award and, for the avoidance of doubt, all accumulated dividends shall be
forfeited immediately upon the forfeiture or cancellation of the Award or applicable portion thereof.
Section 10.
Clawback
. The Award shall be subject to the Clawback and Recoupment Policy adopted by the Board on February 27, 2019,
as such policy may be amended from time to time. In addition, the Board may impose such other clawback, recovery or
recoupment provisions as the Board determines necessary or appropriate, including but not limited to a reacquisition right in
respect of previously acquired Shares or other cash or property upon the occurrence of Cause. The implementation of any
clawback policy will not be deemed a triggering event for purposes of any definition of “good reason” for resignation or
“constructive termination.”
Section 11.
Amendment and Termination
. Subject to the terms of the Plan, any amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by the parties
hereto. Notwithstanding the immediately-preceding sentence, subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee may waive any
conditions or rights under, amend any terms of, or alter, suspend, discontinue, cancel or terminate, this Agreement and/or the
Award; provided that, subject to the terms of the Plan, any such waiver, amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance,
cancellation or termination that would materially impair the rights of the Participant or any holder or beneficiary of the Award
shall not be effective without the written consent of the Participant, holder or beneficiary.
Section 12.
Construction
. The Award granted hereunder is granted by the Company pursuant to the Plan and is in all respects subject to the
terms and conditions of the Plan. The Participant hereby acknowledges that a copy of the Plan has been delivered to the
Participant and accepts the Award
4
hereunder subject to all terms and provisions of the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference. In the event of a conflict or
ambiguity between any term or provision contained herein and a term or provision of the Plan, the Plan will govern and prevail.
The construction of and decisions under the Plan and this Agreement are vested in the Committee, whose determinations shall be
final, conclusive and binding upon the Participant.
Section 13.
Governing Law
. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without
giving effect to the choice of law principles thereof, or principles of conflicts of laws of any other jurisdiction which could cause
the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.
Section 14.
Counterparts
. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 15.
Binding Effect
. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
Section 16.
Severability
. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or
enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, and each other provision of this Agreement shall be severable and
enforceable to the extent permitted by law.
Section 17.
Section 409A. This Agreement is intended to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A of the
Code and shall be construed and administered in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. The Restricted Stock Units granted
hereunder shall be subject to the provisions of Section 16 of the Plan.
Section 18.
Fr
actional Shares. No fractional shares shall be delivered under this Agreement. In lieu of issuing a fraction of a
share in settlement of vested RSUs, the Company shall be entitled to pay to Participant an amount in cash equal to the Fair
Market Value of such fractional share.
Section 19.
Entire Agreement
. This Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof and thereof.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
5
6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first written
above.
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
By:
Name:
Title:
PARTICIPANT
Participant’s Signature: _____________________
Date:
Name:
[Signature Page to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement]
Exhibit 10.54
PERFORMANCE-BASED (rTSR)
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
This Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made as of the 20th day of August 2020 (the “Grant
Date”) between Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”), and __________ (the “Participant”), and is made pursuant to the
terms of the Company’s Amended & Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used herein but not
defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
Section 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Units. The Company hereby grants to the Participant, on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth, an Award consisting of a maximum of [_____] restricted stock units (“Restricted Stock Units” or
“RSUs”), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan. Subject to Section 2, the Participant’s right
to receive all or any portion of the Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder is contingent upon the Company’s level of
achievement of the performance goal (“Performance Goal”) specified in the performance matrix attached as Exhibit A to this
Agreement (the “Performance Matrix”), measured over the “Performance Period” indicated in the Performance Matrix. The
Participant’s target-level Award hereunder is equal to [______] Restricted Stock Units (the “Target Award”). Subject to the terms
and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan, each Restricted Stock Unit represents the right to receive the Fair Market
Value of one Share, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement (including the Performance Matrix) and the
Plan.
Section 2. Vesting of the Restricted Stock Units.
i.Determination of Earned Award. Within 30 days following the end of the Performance Period, the
Committee shall determine whether and to what extent the Award of the Restricted Stock Units has been earned for the
Performance Period (the actual date of such Committee determination, the “Determination Date”). The Committee’s
determination of the foregoing shall be final and binding on the Participant. Upon such determination by the Committee,
the applicable portion of the Restricted Stock Units determined by the Payout Percentage (as defined in the Performance
Matrix) as a percentage of the Target Award shall vest and become non-forfeitable (subject to the Participant’s
continuous service with the Company and its Affiliates (“Service”) from the Grant Date through the Determination Date).
On the Determination Date, any Restricted Stock Units which do not vest in accordance with the immediately preceding
sentence shall immediately be forfeited and cancelled, and the Participant shall not be entitled to any compensation or
other amount with respect thereto.
ii.Change in Control. Notwithstanding Section 2(a), upon the occurrence of a Change in Control prior to the
Determination Date where a Replacement Award is provided to the Participant in lieu of the Restricted Stock Units, the
Restricted Stock Units
#4835-6029-9346v14DEPTS.00106
that remain outstanding as of immediately prior to the Change in Control (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any
Eligible Units (as defined below)) shall remain outstanding and unvested (the “Replacement Units”), and the Replacement
Units will continue to be eligible to vest and be earned in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon the
occurrence of a Change in Control prior to the Determination Date where a Replacement Award is not provided to the
Participant in lieu of the Restricted Stock Units, the Restricted Stock Units that remain outstanding as of immediately
prior to the Change in Control (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Eligible Units) shall immediately vest (i) at the
greater of (x) target level or (y) actual level of achievement (as determined in accordance with the Performance Matrix in
connection with the Change in Control), if the Change in Control occurs prior to the end of the Performance Period, or
(ii) at the actual level of achievement (as determined in accordance with Section 2(a)), if the Change in Control occurs
following the end of the Performance Period but prior to the Determination Date (in which case, the Determination Date
shall occur prior to the Change in Control) (as applicable, the “CIC Vested Awards”). Any CIC Vested Awards will be
treated in accordance with Section 12(b) of the Plan.
iii.Termination of Service without Cause, for Good Reason, or due to Death or Disability (other than During
the 24-Month Period Immediately Following a Change in Control). Notwithstanding anything in Section 2(a) or Section
2(d) to the contrary, upon the occurrence of a termination of the Participant’s Service prior to the Determination Date (i)
by the Company and its Affiliates without Cause, (ii) by the Participant for Good Reason, or (iii) by reason of the
Participant’s death or Disability (each, a “Qualifying Termination”) other than during the 24-month period immediately
following a Change in Control (the “CIC Period”), the Participant will remain eligible to vest (determined in accordance
with Section 2(a) following the end of the Performance Period) in a pro rata portion of the Restricted Stock Units,
determined by multiplying the total number of Restricted Stock Units outstanding and unvested immediately prior to the
Qualifying Termination by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days that the Participant provided
continuous Service during the Performance Period, and the denominator of which is the total number of days in the
Performance Period (such pro-rata portion, the “Eligible Units”). Any Restricted Stock Units that do not constitute
Eligible Units as a result of the immediately-preceding sentence shall immediately be forfeited and cancelled, and the
Participant shall not be entitled to any compensation or other amount with respect thereto.
iv.Qualifying Termination During the CIC Period. Notwithstanding anything in Section 2(a)-(c), if the
Participant incurs a Qualifying Termination during the CIC Period and prior to the Determination Date, then the
Participant’s Replacement Units (if any) shall vest (i) at the greater of (x) target level of achievement or (y) actual level of
achievement (as determined in accordance with the Performance Matrix as of the date of the Qualifying Termination), if
the Qualifying Termination occurs prior to the end of the Performance Period, or (ii) based on the actual level of
achievement (as determined in accordance with Section 2(a) following the end of the Performance Period) if the
Qualifying Termination occurs following the end of the Performance Period but prior to the
- 2 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
Determination Date and, in each case, any portion of the Replacement Units that do not vest as a result of the foregoing
shall be forfeited and cancelled.
v.Other Terminations of Service. Upon the occurrence of a termination of Participant’s Service prior to the
Determination Date for any reason other than as provided in Section 2(c) or (d), all unvested Restricted Stock Units shall
be forfeited and cancelled and Participant shall not be entitled to any compensation or other amount with respect thereto.
Section 3. Settlement. Any Restricted Stock Units that become vested and non-forfeitable pursuant to Section 2
(“Vested RSUs”) shall be settled within three days following the Determination Date (but in no event later than March 15 of the
calendar year following the calendar year in which the Performance Period ended); provided, however, that (a) if a Change in
Control occurs and a Replacement Award is not provided to Participant in lieu of the Restricted Stock Units, then the Vested
RSUs shall be settled immediately upon the Change in Control; and (b) if a Qualifying Termination occurs during the CIC
Period, and prior to the end of the Performance Period, then the vested portion of the Replacement Units determined in
accordance with Section 2(d) shall be settled within three days following the Qualifying Termination. Unless otherwise
determined by the Committee, Vested RSUs will be settled by the Company through the delivery to Participant of a number of
shares of common stock equal to the number of Vested RSUs (rounded down to the nearest whole number).
th
Section 4. Restrictions on Transfer. No Restricted Stock Units (nor any interest therein) may be sold, assigned, alienated,
pledged, attached or otherwise transferred or encumbered by the Participant otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution, and any such purported sale, assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, transfer or encumbrance shall be void and
unenforceable against the Company or any Affiliate; provided that the designation of a beneficiary shall not constitute a sale,
assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, transfer or encumbrance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the discretion of the
Committee, Restricted Stock Units may be transferred by the Participant solely to the Participant’s spouse, siblings, parents,
children and grandchildren or trusts for the benefit of such persons or partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies or
other entities owned solely by such persons, including, but not limited to, trusts for such persons.
Section 5. Investment Representation. The Participant is acquiring the Restricted Stock Units for investment purposes
only and not with a view to, or in connection with, the public distribution thereof in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the “Securities Act”). No Shares shall be acquired unless and until the Company and/or the Participant shall have
complied with all applicable federal or state registration, listing and/or qualification requirements and all other requirements of
law or of any regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, unless the Committee has received evidence satisfactory to it that the
Participant may acquire such shares pursuant to an exemption from registration under the applicable securities laws. The
Participant understands and agrees that none of the RSUs may be offered, sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or
otherwise disposed of except in compliance with this Agreement and the Securities Act pursuant to an effective registration
statement or applicable
- 3 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities or “blue sky” laws.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall have no obligation to deliver any Shares hereunder or make
any other distribution of benefits under hereunder unless such delivery or distribution would comply with all applicable laws
(including, without limitation, the Securities Act), and the applicable requirements of any securities exchange or similar entity.
Section 6. Adjustments. The Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder shall be subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 4(b) of the Plan.
Section 7. No Right of Continued Service. Nothing in the Plan or this Agreement shall confer upon the Participant any
right to continued service with the Company or any Affiliate.
Section 8. Limitation of Rights; Dividend Equivalents. The Participant shall not have any privileges of a stockholder of
the Company with respect to any Restricted Stock Units, including without limitation any right to vote any Shares underlying
such Restricted Stock Units or to receive dividends or other distributions in respect thereof, unless and until Shares underlying
the Restricted Stock Units are delivered to the Participant in accordance with this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
dividends payable with respect to the Restricted Stock Units during the period from the Grant Date through the date the
applicable Restricted Stock Units are settled in accordance with this Agreement will accumulate in cash and be payable to the
Participant on a deferred basis, but only to the extent that the Restricted Stock Units vest and are earned in accordance with this
Agreement. In no event shall the Participant be entitled to any payments relating to dividends paid after the earlier to occur of the
settlement or forfeiture of the applicable Restricted Stock Units and, for the avoidance of doubt, all accumulated dividends shall
be forfeited immediately upon the forfeiture or cancellation of the Restricted Stock Units or applicable portion thereof.
Section 9. Construction. The Award of Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder is granted by the Company pursuant to the
Plan and is in all respects subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. The Participant hereby acknowledges that a copy of the
Plan has been delivered to the Participant and accepts the Restricted Stock Units hereunder subject to all terms and provisions of
the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference. In the event of a conflict or ambiguity between any term or provision
contained herein and a term or provision of the Plan, the Plan will govern and prevail. The construction of and decisions under
the Plan and this Agreement are vested in the Committee, whose determinations shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the
Participant.
Section 10. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of
Nevada, without giving effect to the choice of law principles thereof, or principles of conflicts of laws of any other jurisdiction
which could cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Nevada.
- 4 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
Section 11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 12. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their
respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
Section 13. Section 409A. This Agreement is intended to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A of the Code and
shall be construed and administered in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. If a Change in Control constitutes a payment
event with respect to any portion of the RSUs that are determined to be subject to Section 409A of the Code, then, to the extent
required to avoid the imposition of additional taxes under Section 409A of the Code, the transaction or event shall only constitute
a Change in Control for purposes of the payment timing of such RSUs if such transaction also constitutes a “change in control
event,” as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(5). The Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder shall be subject to the
provisions of Section 16 of the Plan.
Section 14. Entire Agreement. The Participant acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement and the Plan constitute the
entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.
Section 15. Clawback. The Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the Clawback and Recoupment Policy adopted by
the Board on February 27, 2019, as such policy may be amended from time to time. In addition, the Board may impose such
other clawback, recovery or recoupment provisions as the Board determines necessary or appropriate, including but not limited to
a reacquisition right in respect of previously acquired Shares or other cash or property upon the occurrence of Cause. The
implementation of any clawback policy will not be deemed a triggering event for purposes of any definition of “good reason” for
resignation or “constructive termination.”
Section 16. Taxes. The Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to tax and/or other withholding in accordance with
Section 15(e) of the Plan.
Section 17. Fractional Shares. No fractional shares shall be delivered under this Agreement. In lieu of issuing a
fraction of a share in settlement of vested Restricted Stock Units, the Company shall be entitled to pay to Participant an amount
in cash equal to the Fair Market Value of such fractional share.
(SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE)
- 5 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first above written.
- 6 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
By:
Name: Stephanie Lepori
Title: Chief Administrative & Accounting Officer
PARTICIPANT
Participant’s Signature ______________________
Date:
Name:
- 7 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
EXHIBIT A
Performance Matrix
Target Award: Participant’s overall target-level Award hereunder is equal to______ Restricted Stock Units (the “Target Award”).
The “Performance Period” shall be July 20, 2020 through July 19, 2023.
The “Performance Goal” shall be the three-year total shareholder return (“TSR”) of the Company relative to the other entities in
the TSR Index (as defined below). Achievement of the Performance Goal shall be determined by the percentile rank of the
Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of each other entity in the TSR Index.
Determination of TSR: TSR for the Company and each other entity in the TSR Index shall be determined in accordance with the
following formula: TSR shall be calculated by dividing (a) the Closing Average Share Value by (b) the Opening Average Share
Value, expressed as a percentage.
For purposes of determining TSR:
“Opening Average Share Value” means the average, over the trading days in the Opening Average Period, of the closing price of
a company’s common stock multiplied by the Accumulated Shares for each day during the Opening Average Period. The
Opening Average Share Value for the Company shall be $40.16.
“Opening Average Period” means the 20 trading days immediately prior to the first day of the Performance Period.
“Accumulated Shares” means, for a given trading day, the sum of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) a cumulative number of
shares of a company’s common stock purchased with dividends declared on the applicable company’s common stock, assuming
same day reinvestment of the dividends in the common stock of such company at the closing price on the ex-dividend date, for
ex-dividend dates between the first day of the Performance Period and the applicable day.
“Closing Average Share Value” means the average, over the trading days in the Closing Average Period, of the closing price of a
company’s stock multiplied by such company’s Accumulated Shares for each trading day during the Closing Average Period.
“Closing Average Period” means the 20 trading days immediately prior to and including the last day of the Performance Period;
provided, that (i) in the case of a Change in Control where no Replacement Award is provided, the Closing Average Period shall
be the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Change in Control; and (ii) in the case of a Qualifying Termination during the
CIC Period, the Closing Average Period shall be the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of such Qualifying
Termination.
In the event the Committee determines that the common stock of the Company is not widely traded for purposes of determining
the Closing Average Share Value, the Committee shall in
- 8 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
good faith determine the fair market value of one Share as of the end of the Closing Average Period (taking into account any
factors the Committee deems appropriate, including but not limited to any recent transactions in the shares of common stock of
the Company), which shall be deemed to be the Company’s Closing Average Share Value.
The Company’s “Rank” shall be determined by the Company’s position within the ranking of each entity in the TSR Index
(including the Company) in descending order based on their respective TSRs (with the highest TSR having a Rank of one). For
purposes of developing the ordering provided in the immediately-preceding sentence, (A) any entity that filed for bankruptcy
protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code during the Performance Period shall be assigned the lowest order of any
entity in the TSR Index, and (B) any entity that is acquired during the Performance Period, or otherwise no longer listed on a
national securities exchange at the end of the Performance Period (other than the Company), shall be removed from the TSR
Index and shall be excluded for purposes of ordering the entities in the TSR Index (and for purposes of calculating the
Company’s Percentile).
After determining the Company’s Rank, the Company’s “Percentile” will be calculated as follows:
where:
“P” represents the Percentile which will be rounded, if necessary, to the nearest whole percentile by application of regular
rounding.
“N” represents the total number of entities in the TSR Index (including the Company, but after removal of any entities in
accordance with the calculation of the Rank).
“R” represents Company’s Rank (as determined above).
The “Payout Percentage” shall be determined as follows, subject to the exception below:
• Threshold Performance: If the Company’s Percentile equals 35%, the Payout Percentage shall be 50% of the Target
Award. The Payout Percentage shall equal zero if the Company Percentile is less than 35%.
• Target Performance: If the Company’s Percentile equals 50%, the Payout Percentage shall be 100% of the Target Award.
• Maximum Performance: If the Company’s Percentile equals or exceeds 75%, the Payout Percentage shall be 200% of the
Target Award.
- 9 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
•
Straight-line interpolation shall be used to determine the Payout Percentage for any Company Percentile between 35%
and 75 , based upon the Payout Percentages set forth above.
%
The following exception exists with respect to the Payout Percentage determination set forth above: If the Company’s absolute
TSR (irrespective of its Rank or Percentile) is less than 0%, then the Payout Percentage shall not exceed 100% of the Target
Award.
In addition to the Company, the “TSR Index” shall be comprised of the companies in the S&P 400 Midcaps as in effect on the
first day of the Performance Period (subject to adjustment as set forth in the definition of Rank above).
- 10 -
#4835-6029-9346v14
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
Exhibit 14
This Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which includes our Conflicts of Interest Policy attached as Exhibit A
hereto (collectively, the “Code”), embodies the commitment of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) to conduct business in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and ethical standards. All
employees, officers, and members of the Caesars Entertainment, Inc. Board of Directors (the “Board”) are expected to adhere
to those principals and procedures set forth in the Code that apply to them.
We also expect the consultants that we retain generally to abide by the Code.
The Code includes standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of
interest between personal and professional relationships;
Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company
files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in other public
communications made by the Company;
Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified
in the Code; and
(5)
Accountability for adherence to the Code.
Section I
A.
Implementation and Oversight of The Code
The Board is ultimately responsible for the implementation of the Code. The Board has designated the Company’s
Chief Legal Officer to be the compliance officer (such person, or such other person as the Board may subsequently designate
as the compliance officer, the “Compliance Officer”) for the implementation and administration of the Code, provided,
however, that notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Code, any matter submitted to the Audit Committee of the
Board pursuant to the Company’s Whistleblower Hotline Policy and Procedures shall not be reviewed or otherwise
administered by the Compliance Officer unless so directed by the Audit Committee.
Questions regarding the application or interpretation of the Code are inevitable.
1
#4814-7232-5410
Directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company should direct all questions to the Compliance Officer.
2
#4814-7232-5410
The Code, and all amendments of the Code, will be included in the Company’s periodic filings with the SEC and
will be available on the Company’s website.
Statements in the Code to the effect that certain actions may be taken only with the “Company’s approval” mean that
the Compliance Officer must give prior written approval before the proposed action may be undertaken. The Compliance
Officer will act in a manner that is consistent with the requirements and spirit of the Code.
The Code should be read in conjunction with the Company’s other policy statements, including, without
limitation, the Company’s Whistleblower Hotline Policy and Procedures, Conflicts of Interest Policy, Company’s
Securities Trading Policy and Gaming Compliance Policy.
Periodic training may be provided regarding the contents and importance of the Code and related policy statements
and the manner in which violations must be reported and waivers must be requested.
A.
Honest and Ethical Conduct
One person’s dishonest or unethical conduct can harm the Company’s reputation and compromise the trust that the
public and our shareholders have in the Company. For that reason, each director, officer, employee and consultant must be
familiar with and comply with the Code. Compliance with the Code - and therefore all laws and regulations - forms the
foundation of honest and ethical conduct. Accordingly, compliance with the Code is not simply expected; it is mandatory. In
addition, the Company expects that directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company will:
a. Establish an example by their behavior as a model for others subject to the Code.
b. Sustain a culture where honest and ethical conduct is recognized, valued and exemplified by all directors, officers,
employees, consultants and other representatives of the Company.
c. Personally, participate in, and where applicable, lead compliance efforts through meetings with others subject to the
Code and monitor compliance matters and programs.
d. Raise and encourage others to raise concerns and questions about ethical conduct and integrity.
The Company will take such disciplinary or preventive action as it deems appropriate to address any existing or
potential violation of the Code brought to its attention. The Company’s Conflicts of Interest Policy, which is attached to the
Code as Exhibit A, is an integral part of the Code and all Company directors, officers, employees and consultants should
conduct themselves in accordance with its requirements and spirit.
3
#4814-7232-5410
A personal conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s private interest improperly interferes with the interests
of the Company. Personal conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of Company policy, unless they have been
approved by the Company. In particular, a
4
#4814-7232-5410
director, officer, employee, or consultant must never use his or her position with the Company to obtain any improper
personal benefit for himself or herself, for his or her family members, or for any other person, including loans or guarantees
of obligations, from any person or entity, provided, however, that the Code is not intended to prohibit doing business with
vendors, service providers, licensed lenders and the like who do business with the Company, so long as one does not exploit
his or her position with the Company to obtain preferential treatment and so long as any such actions are not in violation of
any applicable law or regulation (including, without limitation, SEC and Nasdaq rules).
Service to the Company should never be subordinated to personal gain an advantage.
Conflicts of interest, unless properly waived by the Company, must be avoided.
Any director, officer, employee or consultant who is aware of a transaction or relationship that could reasonably be
expected to give rise to a conflict of interest should disclose and discuss the matter fully and promptly with the Compliance
Officer, provided however, that alternatively, any complaint may be reported anonymously as provided by the Company’s
Whistleblower Policy and Procedures referenced herein.
A.
Full, Fair, Accurate, Timely and Understandable Public Disclosure
It is the Company’s policy that the information in its public communications, including SEC filings, be full, fair,
accurate, timely, and understandable. All directors, officers, employees and consultants who are involved in the Company’s
disclosure process are responsible for acting in furtherance of this policy. In particular, these individuals are required to
maintain familiarity with the disclosure requirements applicable to the Company and are prohibited from knowingly
misrepresenting, omitting, or causing others to misrepresent or omit, material facts about the Company to others, whether
within or outside the Company, including the Company’s independent auditors. Our disclosures should comply with the letter
and the spirit of applicable law.
All directors, officers, employees and consultants must follow these guidelines:
a. Act honestly, ethically and with integrity.
b. Comply with the Code.
c. Endeavor to ensure full, fair, timely, accurate and understandable disclosure in the Company’s filings with the
SEC.
d. Through communication, make sure that others at the Company understand the Company’s obligations to the
public and under the law with respect to its disclosures, including that results are never more important than
compliance with the law.
e. Encourage others at the Company to raise questions and concerns regarding the Company’s public
disclosures and ensure that such questions and concerns are appropriately addressed.
5
#4814-7232-5410
a. Provide the Company’s directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors involved in the preparation of the
Company’s disclosures to the public with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and
understandable.
b. Act in good faith, responsibly, and with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material
facts or allowing such person’s independent judgment to be subordinated by others.
c. Proactively promote honest and ethical behavior among peers in the work environment.
d. Achieve proper and responsible use of and control over Company assets and resources.
e. Record or participate in the recording of entries in the Company’s books and records that are accurate.
f. Comply with the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls and procedures for financial
reporting and other policy statements.
A.
Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations
It is the Company’s policy to comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Some laws carry criminal
penalties. It is the personal responsibility of each director, officer, employee and consultant to adhere to the standards and
restrictions imposed by those laws, rules, and regulations. The Company expects each director, officer, employee and
consultant to refrain from any illegal, dishonest, or unethical conduct.
Generally, it is both illegal and against Company policy for any director, officer, employee and consultant who is
aware of material nonpublic information relating to the Company, any of the Company’s customers or any other private or
governmental issuer of securities to buy or sell any securities of those issuers, or recommend that another buy, sell or hold
the securities of those issuers. It is the Company’s policy for all directors, officers, employees and consultants to comply
with the Company’s Securities Trading Policy. Any director, officer, employee or consultant with questions regarding
these types of transactions should contact the Compliance Officer.
B.
Duty to Report and Raise Questions and Concerns; Internal Reporting Procedure
Each director, officer, employee, and consultant must report promptly to the Compliance Officer, as well as the
Director of Compliance of any involved Property, the existence (or good faith suspected existence) of any of the following:
• Any outside association, interest, relationship or activity, as it arises, that actually, potentially or apparently
involves a conflict of interest violation (or suspected violation) of the Code;
•
any action or inaction that does not comply with gaming laws or regulations in any jurisdiction in which
the Company does business;
6
#4814-7232-5410
•
•
any action or inaction that does not comply with any condition or limitation placed on any license or
approval granted by any Gaming Authority to the Company or any of its gaming operations;
any other event or circumstance which the employee, officer, director or consultant believes, in good
faith, could impact the Company’s suitability for licensure, or may bring discredit to the Company or the
gaming industry; and
•
any violation of the Code.
Failure to report such relationships, activities, interests, non-compliance with gaming laws or regulations or violations of
the Code will be a ground for disciplinary action.
In addition to the foregoing obligation to report to the Compliance Officer, employees who serve as Directors of
Compliance shall also report such relationships, activities, interests, non-compliance with gaming laws or regulations or
violations of the Code to the General Manager of the involved Property (unless the General Manager is the subject of, or
otherwise involved in, such actual or potential violation). If, after consultation with the Compliance Officer and the General
Manager, the Director of Compliance still maintains a good faith belief that the actual or potential violation has not been
adequately addressed, he or she shall report such matter directly to the Company’s Compliance Committee.
Subject to the provisions of the Code, the Compliance Officer will review disclosures of any actual, potential or
apparent violation of the Code with at least one member of the Company’s Compliance Committee and determine the
appropriate manner by which the Company’s approval or disapproval would be provided. Each director, officer, employee,
and consultant must cooperate fully in the review process by providing all information that the Compliance Officer deems
necessary to conduct an effective review. Company actions with respect to the conflict of interest or potential conflict of
interest will take into account the spirit of the Code.
Upon becoming employed by or associated with the Company each director, officer, employee, and consultant must
sign a statement reflecting awareness and understanding of the Code, including the Conflicts of Interest Policy (“Ethics
Statement”). At the same time, each director, officer, employee and consultant must report either the absence or presence of
actual, potential or apparent conflicts of interest. The Company may from time to time request that any such person affirm
his or her awareness of the Code and Conflicts of Interest Policy by delivering an updated Ethics Statement. A form of
Ethics Statement is attached as Exhibit B hereto.
All interests, relationships or participation in transactions disclosed by any director, officer, employee or consultant in
accordance with this policy shall be held in confidence unless the best interests of the Company dictate otherwise.
The Company recognizes the potentially serious impact of a false accusation.
7
#4814-7232-5410
Employees, officers, directors and consultants are expected as part of the ethical standards required by this Code to act
responsibly in reporting violations. Making a complaint without a
8
#4814-7232-5410
good-faith basis is itself a violation of the Code. Any employee, officer, director or consultant who makes a complaint in bad
faith will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including separation of employment.
Employees, officers, directors and consultants who report violations or suspected violations in good faith, as well as
those who participate in investigations, will not be subject to retaliation of any kind.
Retaliation, which will be broadly construed, is generally defined as the use of authority or influence for the purpose
of interfering with, or discouraging a report of, a violation of the Code or an investigation of an alleged Code violation. The
Company will not permit retaliation where a report of an actual or potential violation was made in good faith.
If you believe someone has retaliated against you because of your good faith report of an actual or suspected
violation, you should immediately advise Human Resources as well as the Compliance Officer, and the Director of
Compliance of the involved Property.
A.
Accountability
All who are subject to the Code are responsible for complying with it and for reporting any known or suspected
violations of it. The Company recognizes that such a mandate may not be meaningful without an accompanying provision for
accountability and discipline of violations of the Code.
Subject to the terms of the Code, reported violations of the Code will be investigated, addressed promptly and treated
confidentially to the extent possible. The Company will strive to impose discipline for each Code violation that fits the nature
and particular facts of the violation. The Company uses a system of progressive discipline and generally will issue warnings
or letters of reprimand for less significant, first-time violations. Violations of a more serious nature may result in termination
of employment or suspension without pay, demotion, loss or reduction of bonus or option awards, or any combination of such
disciplinary measures.
Violations of the Code that go unaddressed are treated by the SEC as implicit waivers of the Code. Accordingly, any
violation that is discovered and not addressed will have to be disclosed in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
SEC or applicable listing standards. In such cases, the SEC’s rules will require disclosure of the nature of any violation, the
date of the violation and the name of the person who committed the violation. Such disclosure would be harmful to the
Company and the individuals involved in the violation.
Subject to the provisions of the Code and the Company’s Whistleblower Policy and Procedures, all investigations of
reported violations of the Code will be supervised by the Compliance Officer. A violation shall be deemed to have occurred
and appropriate consequences shall be determined only by the Board of Directors, any of its committees, or such other
person designated by the Board to act on its behalf.
9
#4814-7232-5410
A.
Protected Disclosures
Nothing in this Code or any agreement between you and the Company:
• will preclude, prohibit or restrict you from (i) communicating with, any federal, state or local administrative or
regulatory agency or authority, including but not limited to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”); (ii) participating or cooperating in any investigation conducted by any governmental agency or
authority; or (iii) filing a charge of discrimination with the United States Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission or any other federal state or local administrative agency or regulatory authority.
•
•
prohibits, or is intended in any manner to prohibit, you from (i) reporting a possible violation of federal or
other applicable law or regulation to any governmental agency or entity, including but not limited to the
Department of Justice, the SEC, the U.S. Congress, and any governmental agency Inspector General, or (ii)
making other disclosures that are protected under whistleblower provisions of federal law or regulation.
Nothing in this Code or any agreement between you and the Company is intended to limit your right to receive
an award (including, without limitation, a monetary reward) for information provided to the SEC. You do not
need the prior authorization of anyone at the Company to make any such reports or disclosures, and you are
not required to notify the Company that you have made such reports or disclosures.
is intended to interfere with or restrain the immunity provided under 18 U.S.C.
§1833(b). You cannot be held criminally or civilly liable under any federal or state trade secret law for the
disclosure of a trade secret that is made (i) (A) in confidence to federal, state or local government officials,
directly or indirectly, or to an attorney, and (B) for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected
violation of law; (ii) in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if filed under
seal; or (iii) in connection with a lawsuit alleging retaliation for reporting a suspected violation of law, if filed
under seal and does not disclose the trade secret, except pursuant to a court order.
The foregoing provisions regarding protected disclosures are intended to comply with all applicable laws. If any laws
are adopted, amended or repealed after the date hereof, this Code shall be deemed to be amended to reflect the same.
A.
Corporate Opportunities
Section II
Directors, officers and employees owe a duty to the Company to advance the Company’s legitimate business interests
when the opportunity to do so arises. Directors, officers and employees are prohibited from taking for themselves (or
directing to a third party) a business
10
#4814-7232-5410
opportunity that is discovered through the use of corporate property, information, or position unless previously approved by
the Board. More generally, directors, officers, employees and
11
#4814-7232-5410
consultants are prohibited from using corporate property, information, or position for personal gain or competing with the
Company.
Sometimes the line between personal and Company benefits may be difficult to discern. The only prudent course of
conduct for our directors, officers, employees and consultants is to make sure that any use of Company property or services
that is not solely for the benefit of the Company is approved beforehand through the Compliance Officer.
A.
Confidentiality
In carrying out the Company’s business, directors, officers, employees and consultants often learn confidential or
proprietary information about the Company, its customers, or other third parties. Directors, officers, employees and
consultants must maintain the confidentiality of all information so entrusted to them, except when disclosure is authorized or
legally mandated. Confidential or proprietary information includes, among other things, any non-public information
concerning the Company, including its business relationships, financial performance, results or prospects, personnel
information, guest information, compensation data, computer processes, customer lists, marketing strategies, pending
projects or proposals, and any non-public information provided by a third party with the expectation that the information be
kept confidential and used solely for the business purpose for which it was conveyed. Directors, officers, employees and
consultants should refer to the Company’s Legal Department for more detailed guidance on this topic.
B.
Fair Dealing
The successful business operation and reputation of the Company are built upon the principals of fair dealing and
ethical conduct. Our reputation for integrity and excellence requires careful observance of the spirit and letter of all
applicable laws and regulations as well as a scrupulous regard for standards of conduct and personal integrity consistent with
this Code. We do not seek competitive advantages through illegal or unethical business practices. Each director, officer,
employee and consultant should endeavor to deal fairly with the Company’s customers, service providers, suppliers,
competitors, and other employees. No director, officer, employee or consultant should take unfair advantage of anyone
through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts, or any unfair
dealing practice.
C.
Equal Employment Opportunity and Harassment
Our focus in personnel decisions is on merit and contribution to the Company’s success.
Concern for the personal dignity and individual worth of every person is an indispensable element in the standard of conduct
that we have set for ourselves. The Company affords equal employment opportunity to all qualified persons without regard to
any impermissible criterion or circumstances. This means equal opportunity in regard to each individual’s terms and
conditions of employment and in regard to any other matter that affects in any way the working environment of the
employee. We do not tolerate or condone any type of discrimination prohibited by law, including harassment.
12
#4814-7232-5410
13
#4814-7232-5410
A.
Protection and Proper Use of Company Assets
All employees, officers, directors, and consultants should protect the Company’s assets and ensure their efficient use.
All Company assets should be used for legitimate business purposes only.
B.
Outside Activities/Employment
Non-salaried employees may hold a job with another employer so long as he or she notifies the Company and
satisfactorily performs his or her job responsibilities with the Company. All employees will be judged by the same
performance standards and will be subject to the Company’s scheduling demands, regardless of any existing outside work
requirements.
If the Company determines that an employee’s outside work interferes with performance or the ability to meet the
requirements of the Company as they are modified from time to time, the employee may be asked to terminate the outside
employment if he or she wishes to remain employed by the Company.
Any outside association, including employment and activities with other entities, should not encroach on the time and
attention any director, officer or employee is expected to devote to his or her Company duties and responsibilities, adversely
affect the quality or quantity of his or her work product or entail his or her use of any Company assets, including its real and
personal property, or imply (without the Company’s approval) the Company’s sponsorship or support. In addition, under no
circumstances is any director, officer or employee permitted to compete with the Company.
Section III
Waivers and Amendments of The Code
From time to time, the Board may amend the Code or waive certain provisions of the Code. Any such amendment
shall be disclosed in the manner and within the time required by applicable laws, regulations, rules and listing standards. Any
requests for a waiver of any provision of the Code must be submitted in writing to the Compliance Officer for review. If a
waiver of any provision of the Code is granted, the Company must publicly disclose the nature of the granted waiver,
including any implicit waiver, the name of the person requesting the waiver, the date of the waiver and any other disclosures
as and to the extent required by any rule of the SEC or applicable listing standard. Waivers of any provision of the Code may
be made only by the Board.
Section IV
Anonymous Reporting of Violations
14
#4814-7232-5410
Any violation of the Code and any violation by the Company or its directors, officers, employees or consultants of
the securities laws, rules or regulations or other laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Company may be reported
anonymously using any one of the methods described in the Company’s Whistleblower Hotline Policy and Procedures,
including,
15
#4814-7232-5410
without limitation, the making of a phone call to a whistleblower hotline at 800-418-6482, extension 687. All such calls shall
be subject to the Company’s Whistleblower Hotline Policy and Procedures. A copy of the Company’s Whistleblower Hotline
Policy and Procedures is available on the Company’s website, in employee break rooms and on employee bulletin boards.
Section V
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Any proposed transaction between the Company and a related party, or in which a related party would have a direct or
indirect material interest, must be promptly disclosed to the Compliance Committee of the Company. The Compliance
Committee is required to disclose such proposed transactions promptly to the Company’s Audit Committee.
Transactions with related parties must be approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Any director
having an interest in the transaction is not permitted to vote on such transaction. The Audit Committee will determine
whether or not to approve such transaction on a case by case basis and in accordance with the provisions of the Audit
Committee Charter and the Code. A “related party” is any of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
an executive officer of the Company;
a director (or director nominee) of the Company;
an immediate family member of any executive officer or director (or director nominee);
a beneficial owner of five percent or more of any class of the Company’s voting securities;
an entity in which one of the above described persons has a substantial ownership interest or control of such
entity; or
any other person or entity that would be deemed to be a related person under Item 404 of SEC
Regulation S-K or applicable Nasdaq rules and regulations.
Adopted by Board of Directors on October 31, 2019
16
#4814-7232-5410
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. CONFLICTS OF
EXHIBIT A
I.
GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY
INTEREST POLICY
It is the policy of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) that directors, officers and
employees (“covered persons”) at all levels be free from any interest, influence or relationship that might conflict, or appear
to conflict, with the best interests of the Company, and that they perform their work with undivided loyalty as measured by
the highest standards of law and ethics. The existence of an actual or potential conflict of interest depends on specific facts.
The principles discussed here are intended to alert covered persons to the possibilities and furnish general guidance. In any
uncertain situation, the covered persons should immediately discuss the matter fully and frankly with his/her supervisor.
Where there is any doubt as to the existence of a conflict of interest, the situation should be disclosed fully, in writing, to the
Company Compliance Officer.
II.
SCOPE OF COVERAGE
This policy applies to both direct and indirect interests of a covered person and members of his or her immediate
family. It extends to transactions by any person who may act on behalf of such covered person or family members in
connection with such interests. In general, a covered person will be regarded as having a beneficial interest in any property
owned or any transactions entered into by such covered person’s spouse or minor children.
Further, this policy is applicable to all parts of the Company including all domestic and foreign subsidiaries and
affiliated companies.
i.
Common Conflict of Interest Situations
The following sections describe a number of common categories of conflicts of interest. They illustrate the
application of Company policy to certain particular situations where conflicts are most likely to arise. They are not all-
inclusive, however, and do not cover all possible situations where conflicts might occur in violation of Company policy:
ii.
Relationships with Vendors, Purchasers and Competitors of the Company
Any covered person who holds any position or employment with, or who receives any compensation, credits or loans
from, or who owns or acquires, directly or indirectly, a beneficial interest in, or rights to the profits of income of, any
concern he or she has reason to believe may supply products or services to, or purchase from, or compete with, the
Company, is required to disclose the full details concerning such interest or relationship. In such circumstances, a conflict
may arise if such covered person is in a position to influence decisions with respect to any Company transaction involving
such other party and if the interest or relationship is such
1
#4814-7232-5410
that it might bring into question such covered person’s continued ability to make independent, impartial judgments in the
Company’s best interest. In this connection, the mere ownership of
2
#4814-7232-5410
securities of a vendor, purchaser or competitor which are listed on a stock exchange or publicly traded in a recognized over-
the-counter market and amounting to less than one percent of the class outstanding, need not be reported.
i.
Gifts or Favors
Acceptance of money, gifts or favors from an individual or concern which a covered person has reason to believe may
transact business, or may seek to transact business, with the Company, will constitute violation of this policy, unless such gift
or favor is of a nominal nature and extent ($100 or less) and is considered normal and customary under the circumstances. All
offers of gifts or favors beyond this policy should be immediately reported to the employee’s supervisor, in the case of a
covered person who is an employee, and to the Company’s Compliance Officer.
ii.
Sensitive Payments
The use of the Company funds or assets by employees for any unlawful purpose is strictly prohibited. Covered
persons shall not:
1.
2.
3.
Establish for any purpose undisclosed or unrecorded funds or assets of the Company.
Make false or artificial entries in the books and records of the Company for any reason.
Engage in any arrangement that results in such prohibited acts.
Any covered person having information or knowledge of any unrecorded fund or asset or any prohibited act shall
promptly report such matter to the Compliance Officer.
iii.
Foreign Transactions and Payments
Having due regard for the responsibilities relating to international operations, it is the Company’s policy that all
covered persons and agents comply with the ethical standards and applicable legal requirements of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and of each foreign country in which business is conducted.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act makes it a criminal offense for a United States company or agent acting on its
behalf to pay anything of value to any foreign government official to influence any official action in securing, retaining, or
directing business. This prohibition applies to bribes, kickbacks or like payments made directly to such foreign officials or
indirectly through seemingly legitimate payments such as commissions or consulting fees paid to overseas agents or
representatives.
3
#4814-7232-5410
i.
Political Campaign Contributions
Political campaign contributions include direct expenditures or contributions, in cash or property, to candidates for
nomination or election to public office or to political parties, as well as indirect assistance or support such as the furnishing
of goods, services or equipment, or other political fund-raising events.
No political campaign contributions shall be made by the Company in cash or by any other means whereby the
amount or origin of the contribution cannot be readily established by reference to the documents and records of the Company.
All contributions shall be made to the candidates authorized campaign committee, or to a political party, or to other recipients
who may legally receive such contributions and all reporting requirements of the state or local jurisdictions shall be complied
with. Each contribution shall be clearly recorded on the Company’s books as a political campaign contribution or its
equivalent and shall not be deducted for federal, state or local income tax purposes unless authorized under applicable law.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act also prohibits contributions to foreign political parties or candidates for foreign
political office for the purpose of influencing their actions to secure, retain or direct business. The prohibition applies
regardless of whether the contribution is lawful under the laws of the country in which it is made. Accordingly, company
policy strictly prohibits any payments with corporate funds, to, or any use of corporate assets for the benefit of, any foreign
political party or candidate for political office.
I.
SUMMARY OF GENERAL OBLIGATIONS OF EMPLOYEES
Under this policy, covered persons are responsible for:
•
•
Full and immediate disclosure of any interest which they or members of their immediate families have at the
time of association with the Company, or acquire during such covered person’s association with the
Company, which create or appear to create a possible conflict with the Company’s interests. In furtherance of
this, all new employees will be routinely provided a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Policy and will be
required to execute a signed acknowledgement of its receipt; and
Taking any actions regarded by the company as being necessary to eliminate or satisfactorily regulate a
conflict of interest situation.
II.
FAILURE TO COMPLY
Failure to comply with this policy and procedures can result in disciplinary actions up to and including termination of
employment, and/or initiation of appropriate legal action.
III.
FURNISHING DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
With respect to any disclosure information furnished in accordance with the Company’s Conflicts of Interest Policy,
the Company will endeavor to properly protect such information.
4
#4814-7232-5410
5
#4814-7232-5410
EXHIBIT B
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT CONFIRMATION STATEMENT
I, hereby confirm the following statements to Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”):
(1)
(2)
(3)
I am a director, officer, employee or consultant of the Company and/or one of its subsidiaries.
I have read and I understand the Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (the “Code”),
including its Conflicts of Interest Policy.
There is no actual, potential or apparent conflict of interest between myself or any of my immediate family
members and the Company (or any of its subsidiaries) that would violate the Code, except
Date:
.
(4)
I understand that the Code and all amendments to the Code are available for my review on the Company’s
website and upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary.
(Signature)
(Name)
(Title)
Director
1
#4814-7232-5410
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
As of February 26, 2021
Name
1300 WSED, LLC
1301 WSED, LLC
1400 WSED, LLC
3535 LV Corp.
3535 LV Newco, LLC
AC Conference Holdco., LLC
AC Conference Newco., LLC
Aster Insurance Ltd.
Aztar Indiana Gaming Company, LLC
Aztar Riverboat Holding Company, LLC
Bally's Las Vegas Manager, LLC
Bally's Park Place, LLC
Benco, LLC
BL Development, LLC
Black Hawk Holdings, L.L.C.
Boardwalk Regency LLC
Burlington Street Services Limited
BV Manager, LLC
Caesars Asia Limited
Caesars Bahamas Investment Corporation
Caesars Bahamas Management Corporation
Caesars Baltimore Acquisition Company, LLC
Caesars Baltimore Investment Company, LLC
Caesars Baltimore Management Company, LLC
Caesars Cayman Finance Limited
Caesars Cayman Finance 2 Limited
Caesars Convention Center Owner, LLC
Caesars Dubai, LLC
Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC
Caesars Entertainment Japan, LLC
Caesars Entertainment UK Ltd.
Caesars Entertainment Windsor Limited
Caesars Growth Bally's LV, LLC
Caesars Growth Baltimore Fee, LLC
Caesars Growth Cromwell, LLC
Caesars Growth Harrah's New Orleans, LLC
Caesars Growth Partners, LLC
Caesars Growth PH Fee, LLC
Caesars Growth PH, LLC
Caesars Growth Quad, LLC
Caesars Holdings, Inc.
Caesars Hospitality, LLC
Caesars Interactive Entertainment New Jersey, LLC
Caesars Interactive Entertainment, LLC
(1)
Exhibit 21
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
Delaware
Maryland
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Bermuda
Indiana
Indiana
Delaware
New Jersey
Nevada
Minnesota
Colorado
New Jersey
United Kingdom
Delaware
Hong Kong
Bahamas
Bahamas
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
United Kingdom
Canada
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Name
Caesars Interactive Holdco, LLC
Caesars International Hospitality, LLC
Caesars Korea Holding Company, LLC
Caesars Korea Services, LLC
Caesars License Company, LLC
Caesars Linq, LLC
Caesars Massachusetts Investment Company, LLC
Caesars Mayfair Limited
Caesars Nevada Newco LLC
Caesars New Jersey, LLC
Caesars Octavius, LLC
Caesars Ontario Holding, Inc.
Caesars Palace LLC
Caesars Palace Realty LLC
Caesars Parlay Holding, LLC
Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC
Caesars Trex, Inc.
Caesars UK Holdings Limited
Caesars UK Interactive Holdings Limited
Caesars Virginia, LLC
Caesars World International Corporation (S) PTE, Ltd.
Caesars World International Far East Limited
Caesars World, LLC
Caesars World Marketing LLC
Caesars World Merchandising, LLC
California Clearing Corporation
Capri Insurance Corporation
Catfish Queen Partnership in Commendam
Casino Computer Programming, Inc.
CBAC Borrower, LLC
(2)
CBAC Gaming, LLC
CBAC Holding Company, LLC
CC-Reno, LLC
CCR Newco, LLC
CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc.
Centaur Acquisition, LLC
Centaur Colorado, LLC
Centaur Holdings, LLC
Centroplex Centre Convention Hotel, L.L.C.
CEOC, LLC
CEWL Holdco, LLC
Chester Downs and Marina LLC
Chester Facility Holding Company, LLC
Christian County Land Acquisition Company, LLC
CIE Growth, LLC
Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture
Exhibit 21
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
United Kingdom
Nevada
New Jersey
Delaware
Canada
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
Indiana
Delaware
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Delaware
Singapore
Hong Kong
Florida
New Jersey
Nevada
California
Hawaii
Louisiana
Indiana
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Colorado
Indiana
Delaware
Delaware
Louisiana
Delaware
Delaware
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Nevada
(3)
(6)
(5)
(4)
Name
Columbia Properties Tahoe, LLC
Columbus Southeast Hotel Group, LLC
Corner Investment Company, LLC
CPLV Manager, LLC
CR Baltimore Holdings, LLC
CRC Finco, Inc.
Cromwell Manager, LLC
CRS Annex, LLC
Des Plaines Development Limited Partnership
Desert Palace, LLC
Downtown Management Company, LLC
Eastside Convention Center, LLC
Eldo Fit, LLC
Eldorado Holdco LLC
Eldorado Interactive, LLC
Eldorado Limited Liability Company
Eldorado Resorts, LLC
Elgin Holdings I, LLC
Elgin Holdings II, LLC
Elgin Riverboat Resort - Riverboat Casino
Emerald Safari Resort (Pty) Limited
Entertainment RMG Canada, Inc.
Flamingo CERP Manager, LLC
Flamingo Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC
GB Investor, LLC
Giles Road Developer, LLC
Golden Nugget Club Limited
Grand Casinos of Biloxi, LLC
Grand Casinos, Inc.
Harrah South Shore Corporation
Harrah's Arizona Corporation
Harrah's Atlantic City Operating Company, LLC
Harrah's Atlantic City Propco, LLC
Harrah's Bossier City Investment Company, LLC
Harrah's Chester Downs Investment Company, LLC
Harrah's Chester Downs Management Company, LLC
Harrah's Illinois LLC
Harrah's Interactive Investment Company
Harrah's Iowa Arena Management, LLC
Harrah's Las Vegas, LLC
Harrah's Laughlin, LLC
Harrah's Management Company
Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLC
Harrah's New Orleans Management Company, LLC
Harrah's North Kansas City LLC
Harrah's Operating Company Memphis, LLC
Harrah's Shreveport/Bossier City Investment Company, LLC
Exhibit 21
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
Nevada
Ohio
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
Illinois
South Africa
Canada
Nevada
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
United Kingdom
Minnesota
Minnesota
California
Nevada
New Jersey
Delaware
Louisiana
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
North Carolina
Nevada
Missouri
Delaware
Delaware
Name
Harveys BR Management Company, Inc.
Harveys Iowa Management Company, LLC
Harveys Tahoe Management Company, LLC
HBR Realty Company, LLC
HCAL, LLC
HLV CERP Manager, LLC
Hole in the Wall, LLC
Hoosier Park, LLC
Horseshoe Cincinnati Management, LLC
Horseshoe Entertainment
Horseshoe Gaming Holding, LLC
Horseshoe GP, LLC
Horseshoe Hammond, LLC
HP Dining & Entertainment, LLC
HP Dining & Entertainment II, LLC
HTM Holding, LLC
IC Holdings Colorado, Inc.
Inter Casino Management (Egypt) Limited
IOC Black Hawk County, Inc.
IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC
IOC Holdings, L.L.C.
IOC Manufacturing, Inc.
IOC Pittsburgh, Inc.
IOC Services, LLC
IOC-Boonville, Inc.
IOC-Lula, Inc.
IOC-Natchez, Inc.
IOC-PA, L.L.C.
IOC-Vicksburg, Inc.
IOC-Vicksburg, L.L.C.
Isle of Capri Bettendorf, LLC
Isle of Capri Bettendorf Marina Corporation
Isle of Capri Black Hawk, LLC
Isle of Capri Casinos, LLC
Isle Promotional Association, Inc.
Jazz Casino Company, LLC
JCC Fulton Development, LLC
JCC Holding Company II, LLC
JGB Vegas Retail Lessee, LLC
Keystone State Development, Inc.
Joliet Manager, LLC
Lady Luck Gaming Corporation
Lady Luck Vicksburg, Inc.
Laughlin CERP Manager, LLC
Laundry Newco, LLC
LCI (Overseas) Investments (Pty) Ltd.
Lighthouse Point, LLC
(7)
Exhibit 21
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Indiana
Delaware
Louisiana
Delaware
Nevada
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Nevada
Colorado
Isle of Man
Iowa
Colorado
Louisiana
MS
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Nevada
Mississippi
Mississippi
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Delaware
Iowa
Iowa
Colorado
Delaware
Colorado
Louisiana
Louisiana
Delaware
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Delaware
Mississippi
Nevada
Delaware
South Africa
Mississippi
Name
LINQCUP, LLC
London Clubs (Overseas) Limited
London Clubs Brighton Limited
Exhibit 21
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
Delaware
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
(8)
Name
London Clubs Glasgow Limited
London Clubs Holdings Limited
London Clubs International Limited
London Clubs Leeds Limited
London Clubs LSQ Limited
London Clubs Management Limited
London Clubs Manchester Limited
London Clubs Nottingham Limited
London Clubs Poker Room Limited
London Clubs South Africa Limited
London Clubs Southend Limited
London Clubs Trustee Limited
MB Development, LLC
MTR Gaming Group, Inc.
MVCE Middle East, LLC
New Centaur, LLC
New Gaming Capital Partnership
New Jazz Enterprises, LLC
New Robinson Property Group, LLC
New Tropicana Holdings, Inc.
New Tropicana OpCo, Inc.
Non-CPLV Manager, LLC
Octavius/Linq Intermediate Holding, LLC
Old PID, Inc.
OS Holdco, LLC
Pompano Park Holdings, LLC
Pompano Park JV Holdings, LLC
Parball LLC
Parball Newco, LLC
Paris CERP Manager, LLC
Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC
Parlay Solutions, LLC
PHW Las Vegas, LLC
PHW Manager, LLC
PHWCUP, LLC
PHWLV, LLC
Pier at Caesars LLC
Playboy Club (London) Limited
Players Bluegrass Downs, LLC
Players Holding, LLC
Players International, LLC
PPI, Inc.
PPI Development, LLC
PPI Development Holdings, LLC
Racelinebet, Inc.
Rio CERP Manager, LLC
Rio Properties, LLC
(10)
(9)
Exhibit 21
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
Scotland
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Nevada
Delaware
Dubai
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Pennsylvania
Nevada
Florida
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Delaware
Nevada
Nevada
Delaware
Nevada
New Jersey
United Kingdom
Kentucky
Nevada
Nevada
Florida
Delaware
Delaware
Oregon
Nevada
Nevada
Exhibit 21
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
Mississippi
Indiana
Indiana
Nevada
Ohio
Ohio
Nevada
Nevada
New Jersey
Illinois
Delaware
Massachusetts
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
United Kingdom
New Jersey
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
Nevada
Delaware
Delaware
Canada
Name
Robinson Property Group LLC
Roman Entertainment Corporation of Indiana
Roman Holding Company of Indiana, LLC
Romulus Risk and Insurance Company, Inc.
Scioto Downs, Inc.
SDRS, Inc.
Sharp Dressed Man Las Vegas, LLC
(11
Sharp Dressed Man Manager, LLC
Showboat Atlantic City Operating Company, LLC
Southern Illinois Riverboat/Casino Cruises, LLC
St. Charles Gaming Company, L.L.C.
(12)
Sterling Suffolk Racecourse, LLC
TEI (ES), LLC
TEI (St. Louis) RE, LLC
TEI (STLH), LLC
TEI R7 Investment LLC
The Caesars Foundation
The Quad Manager, LLC
The Sportsman Club Limited
Tropicana Atlantic City Corp.
Tropicana Entertainment, Inc.
Tropicana Laughlin, LLC
Tropicana St. Louis LLC
Tropicana St. Louis RE LLC
TropWorld Games LLC
Tunica Roadhouse LLC
Vegas Development Land Owner, LLC
Windsor Casino Limited
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
69% CEOC, LLC; 31% Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
75.8% CR Baltimore Holdings, LLC; 24.2% third party shareholders
42% Scioto Downs, Inc.; 58% third party shareholder
58.51% Caesars Baltimore Investment Company, LLC; 41.49% third party shareholders
80% Harrah's Illinois LLC; 20% third party shareholder
70% LCI (Overseas) Investments Pty Ltd.; 30% third party shareholders
8.65% GB Investor, LLC; 91.35% third party shareholder
49% Caesars Dubai LLC; 51% third party shareholder
50% PPI Development, LLC; 50% third party shareholder
50% Caesars Parlay Holdings, LLC; 50% third party shareholder
50% Caesars Hospitality, LLC; 50% third-party shareholder
4.09% Caesars Massachusetts Investment Company, LLC; 95.91% third party shareholders
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Exhibit 23.1
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-198830, 333-203227, 333-232336, and 333-245051 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement Nos. 333-233591 and 333-214422 on Form S-4, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-239175 and 333-218775 on Form S-3 of our
reports dated February 25, 2021, relating to the financial statements of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 26, 2021
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 23.2
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1) Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-218775 and 333-239175) and in the related Prospectus of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (formerly Eldorado Resorts, Inc.);
(2) Registration Statements on Form S-4 (Nos. 333-233591 and 333-214422) and in the related Prospectus of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (formerly Eldorado Resorts,
Inc.); and
(3) Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-198830, 333-203227, 333-232336, and 333-245051) of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (formerly Eldorado Resorts, Inc.)
of our report dated February 27, 2020 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (formerly Eldorado Resorts, Inc.) as of December
31, 2019 and for the two years then ended included this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (formerly Eldorado Resorts, Inc.) for the year ended
December 31, 2020.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 26, 2021
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a‑14(a) AND 15d‑14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Exhibit 31.1
I, Thomas R. Reeg, certify that:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10‑K of Caesars Entertainment, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(f) and
15d‑15(f) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: February 26, 2021
/s/ THOMAS R. REEG
Thomas R. Reeg
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Exhibit 31.2
I, Bret Yunker, certify that:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Caesars Entertainment, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: February 26, 2021
/s/ BRET YUNKER
Bret Yunker
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION
of
Thomas R. Reeg
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
I, Thomas R. Reeg, Chief Executive Officer of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1.
2.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
Date: February 26, 2021
/s/ THOMAS R. REEG
Thomas R. Reeg
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION
of
Bret Yunker
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
I, Bret Yunker, Chief Financial Officer of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1.
2.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
Date: February 26, 2021
/s/ BRET YUNKER
Bret Yunker
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1
General
Description of Governmental Regulations
The ownership, operation, and management of our gaming, betting and racing facilities (generically referred to herein as “gaming”) are subject to
significant regulation under the laws and regulations of each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Gaming laws are generally based upon declarations of
public policy designed to protect gaming consumers and the viability and integrity of the gaming industry. Gaming laws may also be designed to protect
and maximize state and local revenues derived through taxes and licensing fees imposed on gaming industry participants, as well as to enhance
development and tourism. To accomplish these public policy goals, gaming laws establish stringent procedures to ensure that participants in the gaming
industry meet certain standards of character and fitness. In addition, gaming laws require gaming industry participants to:
•
•
•
ensure that unsuitable individuals and organizations have no role in gaming operations;
establish procedures designed to prevent cheating and fraudulent practices;
establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures;
• maintain effective controls over their financial practices, including establishing minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the
safeguarding of assets and revenues;
• maintain systems for reliable record keeping;
•
•
•
file periodic reports with gaming regulators;
ensure that contracts and financial transactions are commercially reasonable, reflect fair market value and are arms-length transactions; and
establish programs to promote responsible gaming.
Typically, a state regulatory environment is established by statute and is administered by a regulatory agency with broad discretion to regulate the affairs of
owners, managers, and persons with financial interests in gaming operations. Among other things, gaming authorities in the various jurisdictions in which
we operate:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
adopt rules and regulations under the implementing statutes;
interpret and enforce gaming laws;
impose disciplinary sanctions for violations, including fines and penalties;
review the character and fitness of participants in gaming operations and make determinations regarding their suitability or qualification for
licensure;
grant licenses for participation in gaming operations;
collect and review reports and information submitted by participants in gaming operations;
review and approve transactions, such as acquisitions or change-of-control transactions of gaming industry participants, securities offerings and
debt transactions engaged in by such participants; and
establish and collect fees and taxes.
Any change in the laws or regulations of a gaming jurisdiction could have a material adverse effect on our gaming operations.
Licensing and Suitability Determinations
Gaming laws require us, each of our subsidiaries engaged in gaming operations, certain of our directors, officers and employees, and in some cases, certain
of our shareholders and holders of our debt securities, to obtain licenses from gaming authorities. Licenses typically require a determination that the
applicant qualifies or is suitable to hold the license. Gaming authorities have broad discretion in determining whether an applicant qualifies for licensing or
should be deemed suitable.
1
Criteria used in determining whether to grant or renew a license to conduct gaming operations, while varying between jurisdictions, generally include
consideration of factors such as:
•
•
•
•
•
the good character, honesty and integrity of the applicant;
the financial stability, integrity and responsibility of the applicant, including whether the operation is adequately capitalized in the state and
exhibits the ability to maintain adequate insurance levels; the quality of the applicant’s casino facilities;
the amount of revenue to be derived by the applicable state from the operation of the applicant’s casino;
the applicant’s practices with respect to minority hiring and training; and
the effect on competition and general impact on the community.
In evaluating individual applicants, gaming authorities consider the individual’s business experience and reputation for good character, the individual’s
criminal history and the character of those with whom the individual associates.
Many gaming jurisdictions limit the number of licenses granted to operate casinos within the state, and some states limit the number of licenses granted to
any one gaming operator. Licenses under gaming laws are generally not transferable without regulatory approval. Licenses in most of the jurisdictions in
which we conduct gaming operations are granted for limited durations and require renewal from time to time. There can be no assurance that any of our
licenses will be renewed. The failure to renew any of our licenses could have a material adverse effect on our gaming operations.
In addition to us and our direct and indirect subsidiaries engaged in gaming operations, gaming authorities may investigate any individual who has a
material relationship to or material involvement with any of these entities to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed. Our
officers, directors and certain key employees must file applications with the gaming authorities and may be required to be licensed, qualify or be found
suitable in many jurisdictions. Gaming authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause which they deem reasonable. Qualification and
suitability determinations require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant must pay
all the costs of the investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to gaming authorities and in addition to their authority to deny an
application for licensure, qualification or a finding of suitability, gaming authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position.
If one or more gaming authorities were to find that an officer, director or key employee fails to qualify or is unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to
continue having a relationship with us, we would be required to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, gaming authorities may require us to
terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications.
Moreover, in many jurisdictions, certain of our stockholders or holders of our debt securities may be required to undergo a suitability investigation similar
to that described above. Many jurisdictions require any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than a certain percentage of our voting
securities, typically 5%, to report the acquisition to gaming authorities, and gaming authorities may require such holders to apply for qualification or a
finding of suitability.
Most gaming authorities, however, allow an “institutional investor” to apply for a waiver. An “institutional investor” is generally defined as an investor
acquiring and holding voting securities in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor for passive investment purposes only, and not for the
purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a member of our board of directors, any change in our corporate charter, bylaws, management,
policies or operations, or those of any of our gaming affiliates, or the taking of any other action which gaming authorities find to be inconsistent with
holding our voting securities for passive investment purposes only. Even if a waiver is granted, an institutional investor generally may not take any action
inconsistent with its status when the waiver was granted without once again becoming subject to the foregoing reporting and application obligations.
Generally, any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within the prescribed period after being advised that it is required
by gaming authorities may be denied a license or found unsuitable, as applicable. Any stockholder found unsuitable or denied a license and who holds,
directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of our voting securities beyond such period of time, as may be prescribed by the applicable gaming
authorities, may be guilty of a criminal offense. Furthermore, we may be subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable
to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or any of our subsidiaries, we: (i) pay that person any dividend or interest upon our voting
securities; (ii) allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person; (iii) pay remuneration
in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise; or (iv) fail to pursue all
2
lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of said voting securities
for cash at fair market value.
The gaming jurisdictions in which we operate also require that suppliers of certain goods and services to gaming industry participants be licensed and
require us to purchase and lease gaming equipment, and certain supplies and services only from licensed suppliers.
Violations of Gaming Laws
If we or our subsidiaries violate applicable gaming laws, our gaming licenses could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked by gaming authorities,
and we and any other persons involved could be subject to substantial fines. Further, a supervisor or conservator can be appointed by gaming authorities to
operate our gaming properties, or in some jurisdictions, take title to our gaming assets in the jurisdiction, and under certain circumstances, earnings
generated during such appointment could be forfeited to the applicable state or states. Furthermore, violations of laws in one jurisdiction could result in
disciplinary action in other jurisdictions. As a result, violations by us of applicable gaming laws could have a material adverse effect on our gaming
operations.
Some gaming jurisdictions prohibit certain types of political activity by a gaming licensee, its officers, directors and key people. A violation of such a
prohibition may subject the offender to criminal and/or disciplinary action.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
We are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports and furnish any other information about us and our subsidiaries which
gaming authorities may require. Under federal law, we are required to record and submit detailed reports of currency transactions involving greater than
$10,000 at our casinos as well as any suspicious activity that may occur at such facilities. We are required to maintain a current stock ledger which may be
examined by gaming authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose
the identity of the beneficial owner to gaming authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable.
Gaming authorities may require certificates for our securities to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to specified gaming laws.
Review and Approval of Transactions
Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by us and our subsidiaries must be reported to and in some
cases approved by gaming authorities. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries may make a public offering of securities without the prior approval of certain
gaming authorities. Changes in control through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or otherwise are
subject to receipt of prior approval of gaming authorities. Entities seeking to acquire control of us or one of our subsidiaries must satisfy gaming authorities
with respect to a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control. Gaming authorities may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors
and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control to be investigated and licensed as part of the
approval process relating to the transaction.
Certain gaming laws and regulations in jurisdictions we operate in establish that certain corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of
voting securities and corporate defense tactics affecting us or our subsidiaries may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming, and as a result,
prior approval may be required before we may make exceptional repurchases of voting securities (such as repurchases which treat holders differently)
above the current market price and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. In certain jurisdictions, the gaming
authorities also require prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by the board of directors of a publicly traded corporation which is registered
with the gaming authority in response to a tender offer made directly to the registered corporation’s stockholders for the purpose of acquiring control of the
registered corporation.
Because of regulatory restrictions, our ability to grant a security interest in any of our gaming assets is limited and subject to receipt of prior approval from
gaming authorities. Further, a pledge of the stock of a subsidiary holding a gaming license and the foreclosure of such a pledge may be ineffective without
the prior approval of gaming authorities in certain jurisdictions. Moreover, our subsidiaries holding gaming licenses may be unable to guarantee a security
issued by an affiliated or parent company pursuant to a public offering, or pledge their assets to secure payment of the obligations evidenced by the security
issued by an affiliated or parent company, without the prior approval of certain gaming authorities.
Some jurisdictions also require us to file a report with the gaming authority within a prescribed period of time following certain financial transactions and
the offering of debt securities. Certain gaming authorities reserve the right to order such transactions rescinded.
3
Certain jurisdictions require the implementation of a compliance review and reporting system created for the purpose of monitoring activities related to our
continuing qualification. These plans require periodic reports to senior management of our company and to the regulatory authorities.
Certain jurisdictions require that an independent audit committee oversee the functions of surveillance and internal audit departments at our casinos.
License Fees and Gaming Taxes
We pay substantial license fees and taxes in many jurisdictions, including some of the counties and cities in which our operations are conducted, in
connection with our casino gaming operations, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved. Depending upon the
particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable with varying frequency. License fees and taxes are based upon such factors as:
•
•
•
•
a percentage of the gross gaming revenues received;
the number of gaming devices and table games operated;
admission fees for customers boarding our riverboat casinos; and/or
one time fees payable upon the initial receipt of license and fees in connection with the renewal of license.
In many jurisdictions, gaming tax rates are graduated, such that they increase as gross gaming revenues increase. Furthermore, tax rates are subject to
change, sometimes with little notice, and such changes could have a material adverse effect on our gaming operations.
In addition to taxes specifically unique to gaming, we are required to pay all other applicable taxes.
Operational Requirements
In most jurisdictions, we are subject to certain requirements and restrictions on how we must conduct our gaming operations. In many states, we are
required to give preference to local suppliers and include minority and women-owned businesses as well as organized labor in construction projects to the
maximum extent practicable as well as in general vendor business activity. Similarly, we may be required to give employment preference to minorities,
women and in-state residents in certain jurisdictions.
Some gaming jurisdictions also prohibit a distribution, except to allow for the payment of taxes, if the distribution would impair the financial viability of
the gaming operation. Moreover, many jurisdictions require a gaming operation to maintain insurance and post bonds in amounts determined by their
gaming authority. In addition, our ability to conduct certain types of games, introduce new games or move existing games within our facilities may be
restricted or subject to regulatory review and approval. Some of our operations are subject to restrictions on the number of gaming positions we may have
and the maximum wagers allowed to be placed by our customers.
Some jurisdictions apply specific conditions that impact our ability to conduct gaming and non-gaming operations. Examples include but are not limited to:
Our land-based casino in New Orleans operates under a casino operating contract (the “COC”) with the State of Louisiana by and through the Louisiana
Gaming Control Board, which assumed the regulatory authority, control and jurisdiction from the Louisiana Economic Development Control Board
pursuant to Louisiana Revised Statute 27:31. The COC was recently renegotiated to extend the term by thirty years to 2054. Under Louisiana state law, our
New Orleans casino is subject to restrictions on the number of hotel rooms, the amount of meeting space within the hotel and how we may market and
advertise the rates we charge for rooms. Also in Louisiana we are required to comply with certain operating conditions applicable to our subsidiaries. In
Mississippi we are required to provide certain amenities at our operations. In Iowa we have entered into agreements with non-profit organizations that hold
the license to conduct gambling games. Similar conditions are applicable to subsidiaries in additional jurisdictions.
4
Indian Gaming
The terms and conditions of management contracts and the operation of casinos and all gaming on Indian land in the United States are subject to the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, (the “IGRA”), which is administered by the National Indian Gaming Commission, (the “NIGC”), the gaming regulatory
agencies of tribal governments, and Class III gaming compacts between the tribes for which we manage casinos and the states in which those casinos are
located. IGRA established three separate classes of tribal gaming-Class I, Class II and Class III. Class I includes all traditional or social games solely for
prizes of minimal value played by a tribe in connection with celebrations or ceremonies. Class II gaming includes games such as bingo, pulltabs,
punchboards, instant bingo and non-banked card games (those that are not played against the house) such as poker. Class III gaming includes casino-style
gaming such as banked table games like blackjack, craps and roulette, and gaming machines such as slots and video poker, as well as lotteries and pari-
mutuel wagering. Harrah’s Ak-Chin and Harrah’s Resort Southern California (Rincon) provide Class II gaming and, as limited by the tribal-state compacts,
Class III gaming. Harrah’s Cherokee currently provides only Class III gaming.
IGRA prohibits all forms of Class III gaming unless the tribe has entered into a written agreement or compact with the state that specifically authorizes the
types of Class III gaming the tribe may offer. These compacts may address, among other things, the manner and extent to which each state will conduct
background investigations and certify the suitability of the manager, its officers, directors, and key employees to conduct gaming on tribal lands. We have
received our permanent certification from the Arizona Department of Gaming as management contractor for the Ak-Chin Indian Community’s casino, a
Tribal-State Compact Gaming Resource Supplier Finding of Suitability from the California Gambling Control Commission in connection with
management of the Rincon San Luiseno Band of Indians casino, and have been licensed by the relevant tribal gaming authorities to manage the Ak-Chin
Indian Community’s casino, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians’ casino and the Rincon San Luiseno Band of Indians’ casino, respectively. In addition,
we provide advisory services under an agreement with the Buena Vista Rancheria of We-Muk Indians of California tribe for their casino operated in Ione,
California.
IGRA requires NIGC approval of management contracts for Class II and Class III gaming as well as the review of all agreements collateral to the
management contracts. Management contracts which are not so approved are void.
Management contracts can be modified or canceled pursuant to an enforcement action taken by the NIGC based on a violation of the law or an issue
affecting suitability.
Indian tribes are sovereign with their own governmental systems, which have primary regulatory authority over gaming on land within the tribes’
jurisdiction. Therefore, persons engaged in gaming activities, including the company, are subject to the provisions of tribal ordinances and regulations on
gaming. These ordinances are subject to review by the NIGC under certain standards established by IGRA. The NIGC may determine that some or all of
the ordinances require amendment, and that additional requirements, including additional licensing requirements, may be imposed on the management
company. The possession of valid licenses from the Ak-Chin Indian Community, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians and the Rincon San Luiseno Band
of Indians, are ongoing conditions of our agreements with these tribes.
Riverboat Casinos
In addition to all other regulations generally applicable to the gaming industry, certain of our riverboat casinos are also subject to regulations applicable to
vessels operating on navigable waterways, including regulations of the U.S. Coast Guard, or alternative inspection requirements. These requirements set
limits on the operation of the vessel, mandate that it must be operated by a minimum complement of licensed personnel, establish periodic inspections,
including the physical inspection of the outside hull, and establish other mechanical and operational rules. In addition, the riverboat casinos may be subject
to future U.S. Coast Guard regulations, or alternative security procedures, designed to increase homeland security which could affect some of our
properties and require significant expenditures to bring such properties into compliance.
Racetracks
We conduct standard bred harness racing at Harrah’s Hoosier Park in Anderson, Indiana, harness racing at Harrah’s Philadelphia in Chester, Pennsylvania,
thoroughbred racing at Indiana Grand Racing & Casino in Shelbyville, Indiana, live horse racing at Louisiana Downs in Bossier City, Louisiana, horse
racing operations at our harness racing track Isle Casino Racing Pompano Park, located in Pompano Beach, Florida, and live standard bred harness racing
at Scioto Downs in the Columbus, Ohio area. Each of these facilities also offer pari-mutuel wagering and live wagering on races held at other facilities.
We currently operate a mix of poker, slot, table games and video lottery terminals at our racetracks depending on the local regulatory environment.
Generally, our gaming operations at racetracks are regulated in the same manner as our gaming operations in other jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions, our
ability to conduct gaming operations may be conditioned on the
5
maintenance of agreements or certain arrangements with horsemen’s or labor groups or meeting minimum live racing requirements.
Regulations governing our horse, and harness racing operations are, in most jurisdictions, administered separately from the regulations governing gaming
operations, with separate licenses and license fee structures. The racing authorities responsible for regulating our racing operations have broad oversight
authority, which may include: annually reviewing and granting racing licenses and racing dates; approving the opening and operation of off track wagering
facilities; approving simulcasting activities; licensing all officers, directors, racing officials and certain other employees of a racing licensee; and approving
certain contracts entered into by a racing licensee affecting racing, pari-mutuel wagering, account wagering and off track wagering operations.
Interactive & Internet Business
We are subject to various federal, state and international laws and regulations that affect our interactive business, including those relating to the privacy and
security of customer and employee personal information and those relating to the Internet, behavioral tracking, mobile applications, advertising and
marketing activities, sweepstakes and contests. Additional laws in all of these areas are likely to be passed in the future, which could result in significant
limitations on or changes to the ways in which we can collect, use, host, store or transmit the personal information and data of our customers or employees,
communicate with our customers, and deliver products and services, or may significantly increase our compliance costs. As our business expands to
include new uses or collection of data that is subject to privacy or security regulations, our compliance requirements and costs will increase and we may be
subject to increased regulatory scrutiny.
In recent years, Caesars Interactive Entertainment, LLC has entered into license agreements with third parties for the use of the World Series of Poker
brand on online gaming websites in Italy and France. In addition, the State of Nevada legalized real money online internet poker within the State. The
Nevada Gaming Commission adopted regulations and established licensing requirements for the operation of real money online internet poker in the State
of Nevada. Caesars Interactive Entertainment, LLC obtained the appropriate licenses in Nevada, and pursuant to a relationship with a third-party software
provider, operation of its real money website began in September 2013. The State of New Jersey also legalized real money online internet gaming within
the State. The New Jersey regulators adopted regulations and established licensing requirements for the operation of real money online internet gaming in
the State of New Jersey. Caesars Interactive Entertainment New Jersey, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caesars Interactive Entertainment, LLC,
obtained a casino license and was issued an Internet Gaming Permit. In conjunction with two third-party platform providers, operation of its real money
websites began in November 2013. Tropicana Atlantic City also received an Internet Gaming Permit and offers internet gaming services pursuant to that
permit. Several states, including Nevada and New Jersey, have also authorized internet- based sports wagering; we and our partners continue to monitor
these and other domestic markets for points of entry.
The gaming and other laws and regulations to which we are subject could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and
regulations could be enacted. For example, in 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) reversed its previously- issued opinion published in 2011,
which stated that interstate transmissions of wire communications that do not relate to a “sporting event or contest” fall outside the purview of the Wire Act
of 1961 (the “Wire Act”). The DOJ’s updated opinion, which is the subject of ongoing litigation in federal court, stated instead that the Wire Act was not
uniformly limited to gaming relating to sporting events or contests and that certain of its provisions apply to non-sports-related wagering activity. Any such
material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our
business and operating results.
Some of our social gaming products and features are based upon traditional casino games, such as slots and table games. Although we do not believe these
products and features constitute gambling, it is possible that additional laws or regulations may be passed in the future that would restrict or impose
additional requirements on our social gaming products and features.
Sports Book Wagering & Online Wagering
We and our partners are subject to various federal, state and international laws and regulations that affect our sports wagering and online wagering
businesses. Additional laws in any of these areas are likely to be passed in the future, which could result in impact to the ways in which we and our partners
are able to offer sports wagering and online wagering in jurisdictions that permit such activities.
6
Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information
Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
(Unaudited)
Exhibit. Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information
The following tables present the balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, statements of operations for years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019,
cash flows for years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2020 of Caesars Resort
Collection, LLC (“CRC”), as it consolidates into CEI as a wholly-owned subsidiary. “Other Operations, Eliminations” presents the operations of CEI’s
other subsidiaries, including eliminations of intercompany transactions. CEI consolidated balance does not include CRC until the period starting from July
20, 2020.
The consolidating condensed balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
December 31, 2020
Other
Operations,
Eliminations
CRC
(1)
December 31, 2019
CEI
Consolidated
CRC
(1)
Other Operations,
Eliminations
CEI Consolidated
(In millions)
CURRENT ASSETS:
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash and investments
Accounts receivable, net
Due from affiliates
Inventories
Prepayments and other current assets
Assets held for sale
Total current assets
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated
affiliates
Property and equipment, net
Gaming licenses and other intangibles, net
Goodwill
Other assets, net
Total assets
$
$
374 $
9
262
613
30
157
1,500
2,945
—
11,763
3,151
8,872
1,412
28,143 $
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current portion of long-term debt
Accounts payable
Accrued interest
Accrued other liabilities
Due to affiliates
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
$
Total current liabilities
Long-term financing obligation
Long-term debt, less current portion
Long-term debt to related party
Deferred income taxes
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Caesars stockholders’ equity
Noncontrolling interests
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
____________________
67 $
110
46
827
12
646
1,708
11,064
8,304
15
1,223
610
22,924
5,202
17
5,219
28,143 $
1,384
2,012
76
(569)
14
93
712
3,722
173
2,570
1,102
851
(176)
8,242
—
55
183
412
(12)
239
877
1,231
5,769
(15)
(57)
622
8,427
(186)
1
(185)
8,242
$
$
$
$
1,758 $
2,021
338
44
44
250
2,212
6,667
173
14,333
4,253
9,723
1,236
36,385 $
67 $
165
229
1,239
—
885
2,585
12,295
14,073
—
1,166
1,232
31,351
5,016
18
5,034
36,385 $
1,393 $
17
402
487
35
147
50
2,531
—
14,294
2,717
4,012
750
24,304 $
64 $
271
20
1,335
4
7
1,701
10,070
7,420
15
1,044
931
21,181
3,109
14
3,123
24,304 $
(1,187) $
(13)
(348)
(483)
(17)
(81)
203
(1,926)
136
(11,679)
(1,606)
(3,102)
(486)
(18,663) $
182 $
(209)
16
(1,028)
(4)
30
(1,013)
(9,099)
(5,095)
(15)
(847)
(588)
(16,657)
(1,992)
(14)
(2,006)
(18,663) $
206
4
54
4
18
66
253
605
136
2,615
1,111
910
264
5,641
246
62
36
307
—
37
688
971
2,325
—
197
343
4,524
1,117
—
1,117
5,641
(1)
In connection with the Merger, CEOC, LLC has been contributed to CRC and the results for the periods presented have been recast as the contribution was between entities under common
control.
Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information
Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
(Unaudited)
The consolidating condensed statements of operations for years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
(In millions)
REVENUES:
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
$
Net revenues
EXPENSES:
Casino and pari-mutuel commissions
Food and beverage
Hotel
Other
General and administrative
Corporate
Impairment charges
Depreciation and amortization
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Total operating expenses
Operating (loss) income
OTHER EXPENSE:
Interest expense, net
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Other (loss) income
Total other expense
(Loss) income from continuing operations
before income taxes
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
Net (loss) income from continuing
operations, net of income taxes
Discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
Net (loss) income
Net (loss) income attributable to
noncontrolling interests
Net (loss) income attributable to Caesars
$
____________________
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Other
Operations,
Eliminations
CEI Consolidated
CRC
(1)
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Other
Operations,
Eliminations
CEI Consolidated
CRC
(1)
2,574 $
591
686
610
4,461
(237) $
(254)
(236)
(260)
(987)
2,337 $
337
450
350
3,474
4,399 $
1,613
1,581
1,144
8,737
(2,591) $
(1,312)
(1,281)
(1,025)
(6,209)
1,529
472
263
310
1,145
224
68
938
169
5,118
(657)
(1,437)
—
(13)
(1,450)
(2,107)
(162)
(2,269)
—
(2,269)
(332)
(211)
(93)
(170)
(263)
(29)
147
(355)
99
(1,207)
220
263
(197)
189
255
475
36
511
—
511
1,197
261
170
140
882
195
215
583
268
3,911
(437)
(1,174)
(197)
176
(1,195)
(1,632)
(126)
(1,758)
—
(1,758)
2,485
1,128
486
599
1,520
258
468
1,019
91
8,054
683
(1,297)
—
(11)
(1,308)
(625)
66
(559)
—
(559)
(1,580)
(889)
(387)
(553)
(1,017)
(192)
(467)
(797)
(54)
(5,936)
(273)
1,011
(8)
20
1,023
750
(110)
640
—
640
5
(2,264) $
(4)
507 $
1
(1,757) $
(1)
(560) $
1
641 $
1,808
301
300
119
2,528
905
239
99
46
503
66
1
222
37
2,118
410
(286)
(8)
9
(285)
125
(44)
81
—
81
—
81
(1)
In connection with the Merger, CEOC, LLC has been contributed to CRC and the results for the periods presented have been recast as the contribution was between entities under common
control.
Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information
Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
(Unaudited)
The consolidating condensed statements of cash flows for years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
(In millions)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
CRC
(1)
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Other Operations,
Eliminations
CEI Consolidated
(582)
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Other Operations,
Eliminations
CRC
(1)
CEI Consolidated
313
Purchase of property and equipment, net
Former Caesars acquisition, net of cash acquired
Acquisition of gaming rights
Proceeds from sale of businesses, property and
equipment, net of cash sold
Proceeds from the sale of investments
Proceeds from insurance related to property
damage
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
Other
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt and revolving
credit facilities
Repayments of long-term debt and revolving
credit facilities
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing
arrangement
Financing obligation payments
Transactions with parent
Debt issuance and extinguishment costs
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Cash paid to settle convertible notes
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of
equity awards
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities
CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash from discontinued operations
Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted
cash classified as assets held for sale
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and
restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash,
beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of
period
____________________
866
(561)
—
—
475
—
5
—
—
(81)
—
(413)
—
(21)
174
—
—
—
—
(2)
(782)
(294)
—
(80)
14
—
—
—
—
200
131
(6,394)
45
352
25
17
(1)
6
(163)
(6,394)
(35)
366
25
17
(1)
6
(360)
(5,819)
(6,179)
3,938
(2,412)
3,219
(58)
(4,384)
(124)
—
—
—
—
179
11
(6)
5
(72)
—
(1,030)
1,422
5,827
(1,330)
5
9
4,384
(232)
2,718
(903)
(16)
—
9,765
(3,742)
3,224
(49)
—
(356)
2,718
(903)
(16)
—
10,462
10,641
(262)
—
—
—
57
129
5,029
(1,205)
11
(6)
5
(15)
129
3,999
217
—
—
—
(5)
—
518
904
(553)
390
—
—
61
5
(5)
(1)
—
450
33
(323)
—
21
(174)
(1)
—
—
(8)
2
(450)
—
—
—
5
—
(548)
(657)
$
392 $
3,824 $
4,216 $
1,422 $
(1,205) $
(1)
In connection with the Merger, CEOC, LLC has been contributed to CRC and the results for the periods presented have been recast as the contribution was between entities under common
control.
(171)
—
—
536
5
—
(1)
—
369
33
(736)
—
—
—
(1)
—
—
(8)
—
(712)
—
—
—
—
—
(30)
247
217
Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information
Caesars Resort Collection, LLC
(Unaudited)
The reconciliations of net income/(loss) attributable to Caesars to Adjusted EBITDA for quarter and year ended December 31, 2020 are as follows:
(In millions)
Net income/(loss) attributable to Caesars
Net income/(loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests
Net income from discontinued operations
Income tax (benefit)/provision
Other (income)/loss
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Interest expense
Depreciation and amortization
Impairment charges
Transaction costs and other operating costs
Stock-based compensation expense
Other items
Adjusted EBITDA
$
____________________
Three Months Ended December 31, 2020
Other
Operations,
Eliminations
CEI
Consolidated
(1)
CRC
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Other
Operations,
Eliminations
CEI
Consolidated
CRC
(1)
$
(468) $
(87) $
(555) $
(2,264) $
507 $
(1,757)
(2)
(1)
23
(1)
—
391
216
3
15
16
7
199 $
—
—
39
(176)
24
175
45
51
11
7
8
97 $
(2)
(1)
62
(177)
24
566
261
54
26
23
15
296 $
(5)
—
162
13
—
1,437
938
68
169
68
74
660 $
4
—
(36)
(189)
197
(263)
(355)
147
99
10
(44)
77 $
(1)
—
126
(176)
197
1,174
583
215
268
78
30
737
(1)
In connection with the Merger, CEOC, LLC has been contributed to CRC and the results for the periods presented have been recast as the contribution was between entities under common
control.