CAMP4 Therapeutics Corporation Annual Report 2004

FY2004 Annual Report · CAMP4 Therapeutics Corporation
Loading PDF…
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2004

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-12182

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as speciﬁed in its Charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

1401 N. Rice Avenue
Oxnard, California
(Address of principal executive ofﬁces)

95-3647070
(I.R.S. Employer
Identiﬁcation No.)

93030
(Zip Code)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (805) 987-9000

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:

TITLE OF EACH CLASS
None

NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
$.01 par value Common Stock
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has ﬁled all reports required to be ﬁled by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such
ﬁling requirements for the past 90 days. Yes H No h

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent ﬁlers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in deﬁnitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. H

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated ﬁler (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes h No H

The aggregate market value of the common stock of the Registrant held by non-afﬁliates computed by reference
to the price at which the common stock was last sold as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently
completed second ﬁscal quarter was approximately $54,455,000.

There were 23,070,097 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of May 24, 2004.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Company’s deﬁnitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
July 30, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Form 10-K. This Proxy
Statement will be ﬁled within 120 days after the end of the ﬁscal year covered by this report.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

THE COMPANY

PART I

California Ampliﬁer, Inc. (the “Company”) designs, manufactures and markets microwave equipment used
in the reception of television programming transmitted from satellites and wireless terrestrial transmission sites,
and two-way transceivers used for wireless high-speed Internet (broadband) service. The Company’s Satellite
business unit designs and markets reception products principally for the Direct Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”)
subscription television market in the United States, as well as a line of consumer and commercial products for
video and data reception. The Wireless Access business unit designs and markets integrated reception and two-
way transmission equipment for broadband data and video applications. California Ampliﬁer is an ISO 9001
certiﬁed company.

The consolidated ﬁnancial statements include the accounts of the Company (a Delaware corporation) and its
wholly-owned French subsidiary, California Ampliﬁer SARL. The French subsidiary essentially functions as an
international sales ofﬁce for the Wireless Access business unit.

As further described in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements, in April 2002 the
Company acquired the DBS dish antenna business of Kaul-Tronics, Inc. and two afﬁliated companies (collectively,
“Kaul-Tronics”). The results of operations of this DBS dish antenna business are included since that date in the
Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements in the Satellite business segment.

As further described in Note 14 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements, in July 2001 the
Company sold its 51% interest in Micro Pulse, a company engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of
antennas and ampliﬁers used principally in global positioning satellite (GPS) applications. Accordingly, the results
of operations of Micro Pulse, which represented a separate business segment of the Company, have been presented
as a discontinued operation in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for ﬁscal year 2002.

The Company was incorporated in California in 1981 and was reincorporated in Delaware in 1987.

RECENT DEVELOPMENT

On April 12, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Vytek Corporation (“Vytek”), a privately-held
company headquartered in San Diego, California engaged in providing hardware and software products and services
that enable both wireless and wireline access to video, voice and data. Vytek has approximately 280 employees
with 10 ofﬁces nationwide. During its 11 months ended November 30, 2003, Vytek recorded unaudited revenues
of approximately $38.4 million. During this period, Vytek generated approximately 40% of its revenues from
wireless and embedded technology products and 60% of its revenues from software development and professional
services.

In connection with this acquisition, the Company: (i) issued approximately 7,268,700 shares of its common
stock to Vytek’s selling stockholders; (ii) issued and deposited 854,700 shares of its common stock into an escrow
fund; (iii) paid approximately $5,000 in lieu of fractional shares; (iv) converted all Vytek employee stock options
outstanding at the time of the merger into a total of 148,821 fully vested Company stock options that had an
aggregate fair value under the Black-Scholes formula of approximately $1,850,000; and (v) incurred total
transaction costs estimated to be $2,550,000. See Note 16 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements
for a description of the escrow fund.

The common shares issued to Vytek’s selling stockholders and issued/deposited to the escrow fund were valued
at $11.26 per share, which was the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq National
Market for the period beginning two trading days before and ending two trading days after December 23, 2003,
the day the acquisition terms were agreed to and announced. The aggregate purchase price, including the shares
deposited into the escrow fund, is approximately $96 million.

See “Vytek Corporation” caption below for an additional description of Vytek’s business.

2

SATELLITE PRODUCTS

The Satellite business unit generates its revenue almost entirely from the sale of outdoor satellite television
reception equipment, with such products accounting for substantially all (98% to 99%) of Satellite segment revenues
in ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002. Sales of the Company’s Satellite business segment amounted to $121 million,
$88.4 million and $78.9 million in ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Such amounts represented 94.1%,
88.4% and 78.3%, respectively, of consolidated sales in these ﬁscal years.

The Company’s principal satellite products are installed at subscribers’ premises to receive subscription
television programming signals that are transmitted from orbiting satellites. The Company’s satellite television
reception products consist principally of a reﬂector dish antenna, feedhorn, and electronics which receive, process
and amplify satellite television signals for distribution over coaxial cable into the building. The dish antenna reﬂects
the satellite microwave signal back to a focal point where a feedhorn collects the microwaves and transfers the
signals into an integrated ampliﬁer/downconverter that is referred to in the satellite industry as a Low Noise Block
Feed (“LNBF”). The microwave ampliﬁer boosts the signal millions of times for further processing. The
downconverter changes the signal from a microwave frequency into a lower intermediate frequency that a satellite
television receiver can acquire, recognize and process to create a picture.

Beginning in the early 1980s the Company was a leading supplier of ampliﬁers and downconverters to the
“large backyard dish” markets worldwide, primarily the United States in the 1980s and 1990s, and Brazil and the
Middle East in the early and mid-1990s. In April 1999, the Company purchased substantially all of the satellite
television products business of Gardiner Communications Corp. This acquisition provided the Company immediate
entry into the DBS subscription television market in North America.

For the past several years, substantially all of the Company’s satellite product sales consisted of DBS products,
because sales of large backyard satellite dish products and other legacy satellite products had declined to a negligible
level. The Company believes that outdoor reception equipment for the DBS television industry will continue to
be its principal satellite product line for the foreseeable future.

WIRELESS ACCESS PRODUCTS

The Company’s Wireless Access business unit accounted for 5.9%, 11.6% and 21.7% of consolidated net sales

in ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Revenue of the Wireless Access business segment revenue by product line for the last three years is as follows

(in $000s):

Wireless television products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Broadband wireless access antenna transceivers . . . . . . . .
Total Wireless Access revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal year ended February 28,

2004

$5,722
1,894
$7,616

2003

$10,004
1,603
$11,607

2002

$ 4,867
16,949
$21,816

Wireless television products are sold to operators of terrestrial wireless television systems (also known as
“Wireless Cable”), and include signal scrambling equipment to encode premium video programming prior to
transmission and reception equipment which is installed at the subscribers’ premises in direct line-of-sight of
terrestrial transmission towers. The reception equipment consists of an antenna to receive the signal, integrated
electronics which “downconvert” (i.e., change) the signal from a microwave frequency to a television frequency,
a low noise ampliﬁer and, if applicable, electronics to decode scrambled signals.

Broadband wireless access antenna transceivers are devices sold to internet service providers or systems
integrators which are mounted outside a subscriber’s premises in direct line-of-sight of a terrestrial transmission
tower, enabling the subscriber to receive two-way high-speed Internet access. These transceivers enable wireless
broadband Internet service via a microwave frequency band (Multichannel Multipoint Distribution System, or
“MMDS”). The transceiver is connected by coaxial cable to a modem inside the subscriber’s premises. The modem
either transmits or receives signals to or from the transceiver. The Company’s revenues from this product line

3

declined substantially after ﬁscal 2002 because the largest owners of this wireless spectrum in the U.S., including
Sprint, ceased the rollout of this wireless broadband service in 2001 principally because of high subscriber
acquisition costs.

In 2003, the Company announced that it had developed an adaptive digital beam-forming smart antenna
technology for use in enhanced access points for high-speed Internet access over wireless networks which use the
802.11 standard, commonly referred to as “Wi-Fi”. The Company believes that this access point technology, named
RASTERTM, effectively addresses issues such as range, data throughput and tolerance to interference that have
hindered the widespread deployment of 802.11 networks. The Company is continuing the development of this
technology, and plans to begin beta testing during calendar year 2004.

For additional information regarding the Company’s sales by business segment and geographical area, see

Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements.

MANUFACTURING

Electronic devices, components and made-to-order assemblies used in the Company’s products are generally
obtained from a number of suppliers, although certain components are obtained from sole source suppliers. Some
devices or components are standard items while others are manufactured to the Company’s speciﬁcations by its
suppliers. The Company believes that most raw materials are available from alternative suppliers. However, any
signiﬁcant interruption in the delivery of such items could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

Over the past several years, printed circuit board assembly has been outsourced to contract manufacturers in
the Paciﬁc Rim. The Company performs ﬁnal assembly and test of most its Satellite LNBF and Wireless Access
products at its facilities in Ventura County, California. Printed circuit assemblies are mounted in various aluminum
and plastic housings, electronically tested, and subjected to additional environmental tests on a sampled basis prior
to packaging and shipping.

Satellite dish antennas are manufactured on a subcontract basis by a non-afﬁliated metal fabrication company
in the U.S. In addition, one of the Company’s Satellite LNBF products is manufactured on a subcontract basis by
a company located in Taiwan.

A substantial portion of the Company’s components, and substantially all printed circuit board assemblies and
housings, are procured from foreign suppliers and contract manufacturers located primarily in Hong Kong, mainland
China, Taiwan, and other Paciﬁc Rim countries. Any signiﬁcant shift in U.S. trade policy toward these countries,
or a signiﬁcant downturn in the economic or ﬁnancial condition of, or any political instability in, these countries,
could cause disruption of the Company’s supply chain or otherwise disrupt the Company’s operations, which could
adversely impact the Company’s business.

Since the fourth quarter of ﬁscal 2004, the price of raw steel, which is a key material for the Company’s satellite
dish antenna products, has increased substantially, which could adversely affect proﬁt margins in ﬁscal 2005. The
Company is taking steps to minimize the impact of these cost increases by, among other things, passing through
these cost increases to customers to the extent possible given competitive market conditions.

ISO 9001 INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION

In 1995, the Company became registered to ISO 9001, the widely recognized international standard for quality
management in product design, manufacturing, quality assurance and marketing. The Company believes that ISO
certiﬁcation is important to its business because most of the Company’s key customers expect their suppliers to
have and maintain ISO certiﬁcation. The registration assessment was performed by Underwriter’s Laboratory, Inc.
according to the ISO 9001:1994 International Standard. Continuous assessments to maintain certiﬁcation are
performed semi-annually, and the Company has maintained its certiﬁcation through each audit evaluation, most
recently in February 2004. In addition, the Company conducts internal audits of processes and procedures on a
quarterly basis. The Company believes that the loss of its ISO certiﬁcation could have a material adverse effect
on its operations, and the Company can provide no assurance that it will be successful in continuing to maintain
such certiﬁcation.

4

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Each of the markets the Company competes in is characterized by technological change, evolving industry
standards, and new product features to meet market requirements. During the last three years, the Company has
focused its research and development resources primarily on Satellite DBS products, two-way wireless non-line-
of-sight integrated transceiver/modems, smart antenna technology for use in 802.11 “Wi-Fi” broadband wireless
networks, and signal enhancing products for mobile telephones that operate in the Personal Communications
Services (“PCS”) spectrum near 1900 megahertz. In addition, development resources were allocated to broaden
existing product lines, reduce product costs and improve performance by product redesign efforts.

Research and development expenses in ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $5,363,000, $5,982,000 and
$7,337,000, respectively. During this three year period the Company’s research and development expenses have
ranged between 4.2% and 7.3% of annual sales.

SALES AND MARKETING

The Company’s sales are predominantly made to customers in the United States. The following table
summarizes the Company’s sales by geographic region for the last three years, as percentages of consolidated sales:

United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Latin America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended February 28,

2004

95.6%
1.3%
1.5%
1.0%
0.2%
0.4%
100.0%

2003

90.5%
4.1%
2.4%
2.3%
0.3%
0.4%
100.0%

2002

82.4%
1.3%
1.7%
2.2%
11.7%
.7%
100.0%

The Company sells its Satellite products primarily to U.S. DBS system operators, systems integrators and
distributors for incorporation into complete subscription satellite television systems. The Company sells its Wireless
Access products directly to system operators as well as through distributors and system integrators. See Note 13
to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements for sales by business segment.

The Company’s sales and marketing functions for both business units are centralized at its corporate
headquarters in Ventura County, California. In addition, the Company has sales ofﬁces and personnel in Paris, France
and Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Sales to customers that accounted for 10% or more of consolidated annual sales in any one of the last three

years, as a percent of consolidated sales, are as follows:

Customer

A
B
C
D
E

Segment

Satellite
Satellite
Satellite
Wireless
Satellite

Year ended February 28,

2004

39.4%
22.9%
5.9%
0.1%
—

2003

43.8%
9.8%
9.5%
—
0.1%

2002

25.8%
.2%
30.6%
13.5%
11.7%

Echostar Communications Corporation (identiﬁed as Customer A in the table above), owns and operates the
DISH satellite television service in the U.S. DirecTV Group Inc. (identiﬁed as Customer B in the table above) is
the largest satellite television service provider in the U.S. The Company believes that the loss of Echostar or DirecTV
as a customer would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ﬁnancial position and results of operations.

Sprint (identiﬁed as Customer D in the table above), ceased its rollout of ﬁrst generation line-of-sight ﬁxed
wireless broadband Internet service in 2001. As a result, the Company’s sales to this customer were negligible in
ﬁscal years 2004 and 2003.

5

COMPETITION

The Company’s markets are highly competitive. In addition, if the markets for the Company’s products grow,
the Company anticipates increased competition from new companies entering such markets, some of whom may
have ﬁnancial and technical resources substantially greater than those of the Company. The Company believes that
competition in its markets is based primarily on performance, reputation, product reliability, technical support and
price. The Company’s continued success in these markets will depend in part upon its ability to continue to design
and manufacture quality products at competitive prices.

Satellite Products:

The Company believes that its principal competitors for its Satellite Products business include Sharp
Corporation, Wistron NeWeb Corporation, Winegard Company, Andrew Corporation, Microelectronics
Technology, Inc. and ProBrand. Based on information announced quarterly by the U.S. DBS system operators as
to the total number of subscribers and the subscriber turnover rate, the Company believes that it is a leading supplier
to the market for outdoor subscriber premise equipment for the U.S. satellite television industry. In the Satellite
television market, the Company believes its reputation for performance and quality allows the Company a
competitive advantage if pricing of its products is comparable to its competitors. Because the Company’s Satellite
products are not proprietary, it is possible that they may be duplicated by low-cost producers, resulting in price
and margin pressures.

Wireless Access Products:

The Company believes that its principal competitors for its Wireless Cable television products include
TranSystem, Inc. and Telelynx, Inc., both Taiwanese companies, and that its principal competitors for broadband
wireless access products include, or could include, IPWireless Inc., NextNet Wireless, Inc. and Flarion
Technologies, Inc. The wireless equipment market sectors in which the Company competes are highly fragmented,
and although the Company was a leading supplier of ﬁrst generation line-of-sight MMDS transceivers for broadband
wireless service in calendar years 2000 and 2001, the Company believes that its share of the wireless market sectors
in which it competes is very small at the present time, in part because the MMDS broadband wireless access market
is largely dormant.

The Company believes that its product performance, reliability, low ﬁeld failure rate, technical support and
pricing have been its principal competitive advantages in the past. However, the Wireless Cable television sector
has been shrinking for a number of years, and the MMDS broadband wireless access sector is, as noted above,
largely dormant and will remain so unless the spectrum owners commence system deployments utilizing next
generation non-line-of-sight technology. The Company’s ability to capitalize on its past competitive advantages in
its Wireless business will depend in part on whether and when market demand substantially improves for MMDS
broadband wireless access products. In addition, the Company has not yet commercialized its technology targeted
at broadband wireless access networks which utilize the 802.11 standard.

BACKLOG

The Company’s products are sold to customers that do not usually enter into long-term purchase agreements,
and as a result, the Company’s backlog at any date is not signiﬁcant in relation to its annual sales. In addition, because
of customer order modiﬁcations, cancellations, or orders requiring wire transfers or letters of credit from
international customers, the Company’s backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of sales for any
future period.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Company’s timely application of its technology and its design, development and marketing capabilities

have been of substantially greater importance to its business than patents or licenses.

The Company currently has 22 patents ranging from design features for downconverter and antenna products
to its MultiCipher broadband scrambling system. Those that relate to its downconverter products do not give the
Company any signiﬁcant advantage since other manufacturers using different design approaches can offer similar

6

microwave products in the marketplace. In addition to its awarded patents, the Company currently has 11 patent
applications pending, including 5 patent applications related to smart antenna technology for use in 802.11
broadband wireless networks.

The Company believes that at the present time none of its patents are material to its existing operations. The
Company is currently pursuing several patents in its Wireless Access business unit that, if obtained, could be material
to its future operations.

California Ampliﬁert and MultiCiphert are federally registered trademarks of the Company.

EMPLOYEES

At February 28, 2004, the Company had approximately 260 employees and approximately 255 contracted
production workers. None of the Company’s employees are represented by a labor union. The contracted production
workers are engaged through independent temporary labor agencies in California.

VYTEK CORPORATION

As stated under “Recent Development” above, the Company completed its acquisition of Vytek on April 12,
2004. Vytek is a provider of technology integration solutions catering to the needs of enterprises and original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs), in the emerging wireless and mobile computing sector. Vytek provides integrated
solutions leveraging a mix of professional services and proprietary software and hardware platforms. In addition
to its experience with emerging wireless technologies, Vytek provides both the embedded computing platform and
the complex software systems to enable mobile computing.

Since being founded in April 2000, Vytek has completed seven principal acquisitions, including the acquisition
of Sonik Technologies, Inc. (subsequently renamed Vytek Products, Inc.), a provider of wireless communication
infrastructure equipment; Telamon, Inc. (subsequently renamed Vytek Messaging Services, Inc.), which is the
developer of TelAlert, a leading urgent messaging solution; Planet Technology Solutions, Inc. (subsequently
renamed Vytek Solutions, Inc.), an integrator of wireless solutions catering to retail and supply chain; Rubicon
Technologies, Inc. (subsequently renamed Vytek Public Safety Solutions, Inc.), a provider of software solutions
for municipal and other public safety organizations; MicroKnowledge, Inc., a provider of training services; and
Stellcom, Inc., a provider of mobile computing software and hardware solutions.

Vytek provides mobile and wireless technology solutions to its customers that incorporate an array of
technologies. Vytek’s solutions include state-of-the-art software and hardware, plus the customization services
needed to make them suitable for each customer. Vytek provides development and consulting services under either
“time and materials” or ﬁxed price contracts. Vytek’s customers range from enterprises seeking to utilize mobile
computing to technology innovators developing the next generation of technology devices. Vytek serves customers
in industries such as health care, entertainment, transportation and public safety, among others.

Vytek’s experience includes mobile computing, embedded computing, urgent messaging, enterprise content
delivery, and integrated networks. Vytek’s mobile computing expertise extends enterprise business processes to
mobile workers by establishing connectivity between enterprise applications and a wide range of mobile and
telephony devices. Embedded computing offerings include the development of end-to-end solutions that build and
connect a wide range of devices to back-end systems.

Vytek’s messaging and paging offerings include an urgent messaging software platform known as TelAlert
as well as a series of paging hardware products. Vytek also provides industry speciﬁc solutions such as its suite
of public safety applications that address the needs of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company’s corporate headquarters and its primary manufacturing operations are housed in a building
of approximately 100,000 square feet in Ventura County, California under a lease that runs through June 2011.
The Company also leases small facilities for a sales ofﬁce in France and a product design center in
Chanhassen, Minnesota.

7

In April 2002, as part of the acquisition of the satellite dish manufacturing operation of Kaul-Tronics, Inc.
(as further described in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements), the Company acquired three
buildings in Wisconsin, consisting of two manufacturing plants and one warehouse. During ﬁscal 2004, the
Company outsourced this satellite dish manufacturing operation to a non-afﬁliated metal fabrication company in
the U.S. As a result of this outsourcing, two of the three buildings in Wisconsin were sold during ﬁscal 2004. The
third building is classiﬁed as property held for sale at the end of ﬁscal 2004.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission:

In May 2001,

the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) opened an investigation into the
circumstances surrounding the misstatements in the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements for its 2000 and
2001 ﬁscal years caused by its former controller. In April 2004, the SEC concluded its investigation and issued
a cease and desist order directing the Company to not violate federal securities laws in the future.

Wage-related class action lawsuit:

On April 21, 2004, the Company was served with a complaint alleging certain violations of the California
labor code. Among other charges, the class action complaint alleges that from October 2000 to the present time
certain hourly employees did not take their lunch break within the time period prescribed by state law.
Notwithstanding that the delayed break was at the request of, and for the convenience of, the affected employees,
the Company believes that it could have a liability to pay a wage premium for these delayed lunch breaks. The
Company intends to defend itself vigorously against all allegations in the complaint and has established what
management believes to be an appropriate reserve in the quarter ended February 28, 2004.

Property lease lawsuit and cross-complaint

On May 21, 2004, the Company was served with a lawsuit ﬁled by the owner of a building in Camarillo,
California that was formerly used as the Company’s corporate ofﬁces and principal manufacturing plant under a
15-year lease agreement that expired on February 28, 2004. The lawsuit seeks damages for facility repairs that are
allegedly required in the range of $520,000 to $700,000. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and
intends to defend itself vigorously against all allegations. On May 27, 2004, the Company ﬁled a cross-complaint,
seeking payment by the building owner of approximately $180,000 in deposits and other amounts which the
Company believes it is owed.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the three months ended February 28, 2004, no matters were submitted to a vote of the Company’s

security holders.

8

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED

STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company’s Common Stock trades on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the ticker symbol CAMP. The
following table sets forth for the last two years the quarterly high and low sale prices for the Company’s Common
Stock, as reported by Nasdaq:

Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2004:

1st Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2nd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3rd Quarter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4th Quarter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2003:

1st Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2nd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3rd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4th Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LOW

HIGH

$3.07
3.07
4.05
7.40

$4.96
3.46
3.11
3.76

$ 4.23
4.42
11.60
16.87

$ 7.24
6.40
5.90
6.49

At May 24, 2004 the Company had approximately 1,600 stockholders of record. The number of stockholders
of record does not include the number of persons having beneﬁcial ownership held in “street name” which are
estimated to approximate 10,000. The Company has never paid a cash dividend and has no current plans to pay
cash dividends on its Common Stock.

At February 28, 2004, the Company had two option plans, the “1989 Plan” and the “1999 Plan”. Options to
purchase the Company’s common stock are granted to both employees and directors under the 1999 Plan. Options
can no longer be granted under the 1989 Plan. Both of these plans were approved by the Company’s stockholders.
Further information about these plans is set forth in Note 8 to the consolidated ﬁnancial statements. Certain
information about the plans is as follows:

Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights

2,578,138

Weighted-average
exercise price
of outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights

$10.05

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reﬂected in
the ﬁrst column)

62,250

The 1999 Plan contains an “evergreen” provision under which the pool of options available to grant is
replenished to 500,000 options on the ﬁrst day of each ﬁscal year. Pursuant to this evergreen provision, the pool
of options available to grant under the 1999 Plan was increased from 62,250 to 500,000 effective March 1, 2004.

9

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

OPERATING DATA
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses:

Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-operating income (exp.):

Settlement of litigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net
Total non-operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations

before income tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax (provision) beneﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . .
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gain on sale of discontinued operations,

Year ended February 28,

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

(In thousands except per share amounts)

$128,616
110,950
17,666

$100,044
79,511
20,533

$100,715
78,342
22,373

$117,129
94,128
23,001

$79,429
64,426
15,003

5,363
2,336
3,984
11,683
5,983

—
(243)
(243)

5,740
(26)
5,714

5,982
2,560
3,781
12,323
8,210

—
(215)
(215)

7,995
(2,835)
5,160

7,337
3,456
6,321
17,114
5,259

(1,125)
47
(1,078)

4,181
(1,307)
2,874

6,066
3,460
5,366
14,892
8,109

—
(359)
(359)

7,750
(2,810)
4,940

4,526
4,127
5,006
13,659
1,344

(9,500)
(60)
(9,560)

(8,216)
2,950
(5,266)

—

—

(25)

269

202

net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net income (loss)

—
$ 5,714

Earnings (loss) per share:

Basic:

Income (loss) from continuing operations . .
Income from discontinued operations . . . . . .
Gain on sale of discontinued operations . . .

Diluted:

Income (loss) from continuing operations . .
Income from discontinued operations . . . . . .
Gain on sale of discontinued operations . . .

$

$

$

$

0.39
—
—
0.39

0.37
—
—
0.37

—
5,160

0.35
—
—
0.35

0.35
—
—
0.35

$

$

$

$

$

1,615
4,464

0.21
—
0.12
0.33

0.21
—
0.11
0.32

$

$

$

$

$

February 28,

—
5,209

—
$ (5,064)

0.37
0.02
—
0.39

0.35
0.02
—
0.37

$ (0.44)
0.02
—
$ (0.42)

$ (0.44)
0.02
—
$ (0.42)

$

$

$

$

$

BALANCE SHEET DATA
Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital
Current ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

(In thousands)

$ 67,365
$ 24,589
$ 42,776
2.7
$ 97,642
$ 7,690
$ 65,363

$ 53,092
$ 18,405
$ 34,687
2.9
$ 89,597
$ 12,569
$ 58,623

$ 45,739
$ 15,480
$ 30,259
3.0
$ 56,688
$
3,628
$ 37,580

$ 35,523
$ 15,032
$ 20,491
2.4
$ 49,812
$
4,500
$ 29,624

$37,201
$32,729
$ 4,472
1.1
$51,497
$
145
$18,281

10

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

California Ampliﬁer designs, manufactures and markets microwave equipment used in the reception of
television programming transmitted from satellites and wireless terrestrial transmission sites, and two-way
transceivers used for wireless high-speed Internet (broadband) service. The Company’s Satellite business unit
designs and markets reception products principally for the Direct Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”) subscription
television market in the United States, as well as a line of consumer and commercial products for video and data
reception. The Wireless Access business unit designs and markets integrated reception and two-way transmission
ﬁxed wireless equipment for broadband data and video applications.

The Company’s Satellite products are sold primarily to the two U.S. DBS system operators, Echostar
Communications Corporation and DirecTV Group Inc., as well as to system integrators and distributors for
incorporation into complete subscription satellite television systems. The Company sells its Wireless Access
products directly to system operators as well as through distributors and system integrators.

Revenue consists principally of sales of outdoor reception equipment for the U.S. satellite television industry,
which accounted for over 90% of revenue in the ﬁscal year ended February 28, 2004. The DBS system operators
have approximately 20% share of the total subscription television market in the U.S. In calendar 2003, the size
of the U.S. DBS market grew by 11.8% from 19.35 million subscribers to 21.64 million subscribers.

Demand for the Company’s satellite television reception products are driven not only by the growth in the
overall DBS subscriber base, but also by product upgrade cycles and subscriber “churn”. Churn, which is deﬁned
as subscribers whose service is disconnected for any reason, is an important factor driving demand for the
Company’s satellite products because the outdoor reception equipment typically is not redeployed by the
service provider when churn occurs. Average monthly churn in the U.S. DBS market was approximately 1.53%
and 1.60% in calendar years 2003 and 2002, respectively. Given the size of the U.S. satellite television market
of about 20 million subscribers, this means that in calendar 2003 the aggregate churn amounted to approximately
4 million subscribers.

In April 2002 the Company acquired the satellite dish antenna manufacturing business of Kaul-Tronics. This
acquisition was driven by the strategic goal of becoming a vertically integrated supplier of outdoor customer premise
equipment to the DBS industry. Based on information currently available, the Company believes that its market
share of the outdoor reception equipment for the U.S. DBS industry is now approximately 50%. The Company
believes that the acquisition of Kaul-Tronics has helped increase its share of the overall market, but it has also
contributed to downward pressure on gross proﬁt margins in the satellite business segment because the antenna
dishes are more of a commodity product and therefore have lower margins than the LNBF portion of the outdoor
reception system. Recent increases in the cost of raw steel, which is the primary material for the antenna dishes,
is expected to put additional pressure on satellite product gross margins for at least the near-term future.

Revenue from sale of Wireless Access products accounted for over 20% of the Company’s total revenue in
ﬁscal 2004, but this business unit’s sales have declined over the past two years such that Wireless Access products
accounted for only about 6% of ﬁscal 2004 revenues.

The demand for our products has been affected in the past, and may continue to be affected in the future, by

various factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

• the timing, rescheduling or cancellation of orders from one of our key customers in our Satellite products

business and our ability, as well as the ability of our customers, to manage inventory;

• the rate of subscriber churn in the U.S. DBS market, and the ability of the system operators to manage and

reduce their churn rates

• the rate of growth in the overall subscriber base in the U.S. DBS market

• the economic and market conditions in the wireless communications markets;

11

• our ability to specify, develop or acquire, complete, introduce, market and transition to volume production

new products and technologies in a timely manner;

• the rate at which our present and future customers and end-users adopt our products and technologies in

our target markets.

• the qualiﬁcation, availability and pricing of competing products and technologies and the resulting effects

on sales and pricing of our products; and

For these and other reasons, the Company’s net revenue in ﬁscal 2004 may not necessarily be indicative of
future years’ revenue amounts. From time to time, the Company’s key customers signiﬁcantly reduce their product
orders, or may place signiﬁcantly larger orders, either of which can cause the Company’s quarterly revenues to
ﬂuctuate signiﬁcantly. The Company expects these ﬂuctuations to continue in the future.

As further discussed under the caption “Recent Developments” in Item I, on April 12, 2004 the Company
acquired Vytek Corporation, a privately-held company headquartered in San Diego, California engaged in providing
hardware and software products and services that enable both wireless and wireline access to video, voice and data.
This acquisition was motivated primarily by the strategic goals of increasing the Company’s presence in markets
which offer higher growth and proﬁt margin potential, and diversifying the Company’s business and customer base
beyond its current dependence on the two U.S. DBS system operators.

Material opportunities for the Company include increasing our market share for outdoor reception equipment
in the U.S. DBS market, expanding our presence in wireless industry market segments for both ﬁxed and mobile
wireless applications, and leveraging California Ampliﬁer’s high volume manufacturing capabilities to gain
production contracts with customers of Vytek’s product design and consulting engineering services. The Company’s
challenges include managing recent raw steel cost increases, improving product margins, and integrating the recent
acquisition of Vytek.

Basis of Presentation

The Company uses a 52-53 week ﬁscal year ending on the Saturday closest to February 28, which for ﬁscal
years 2004, 2003 and 2002 fell on February 28, 2004, March 1, 2003 and March 2, 2002, respectively. In these
consolidated ﬁnancial statements, the ﬁscal year end for all years is shown as February 28 for clarity of presentation.
Fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 all consisted of 52 weeks.

As described further in Note 14 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements, in July 2001 the
Company sold its 51% interest in Micro Pulse, a company engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of
antennas and ampliﬁers used principally in GPS applications. Accordingly, the results of operations of Micro Pulse,
which represented a separate business segment of the Company, have been presented as a discontinued operation
in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for ﬁscal year 2002.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its ﬁnancial condition and results of operations are based upon the
Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these ﬁnancial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the ﬁnancial statements and the reported amounts of
sales and expenses during the reporting periods. Areas where signiﬁcant judgments are made include, but are not
limited to: allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, product warranties, the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance, and the valuation of long-lived assets and goodwill. Actual results could differ materially from
these estimates.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company establishes an allowance for estimated bad debts based upon a review and evaluation of
speciﬁc customer accounts identiﬁed as known and expected collection problems, based on historical experience,
due to insolvency, disputes or other collection issues. As further described in Note 1 to the accompanying

12

consolidated ﬁnancial statements, the Company’s customer base is quite concentrated, with four customers
accounting for approximately 77% of the Company’s ﬁscal 2004 sales. Changes in either a key customer’s ﬁnancial
position, or the economy as a whole, could cause actual write-offs to be materially different from the recorded
allowance amount.

Inventories

The Company evaluates the carrying value of inventory on a quarterly basis to determine if the carrying value
is recoverable at estimated selling prices. To the extent that estimated selling prices do not exceed the associated
carrying values, inventory carrying amounts are written down. In addition, the Company generally treats inventory
on hand or committed with suppliers, which is not expected to be sold within the next 12 months, as excess and
thus appropriate write-downs of the inventory carrying amounts are established through a charge to cost of sales.
Estimated usage in the next 12 months is based on ﬁrm demand represented by orders in backlog at the end of
the quarter and management’s estimate of sales beyond existing backlog, giving consideration to customers’
forecasted demand, ordering patterns and product life cycles. Signiﬁcant reductions in product pricing, or changes
in technology and/or demand may necessitate additional write-downs of inventory carrying value in the future.

Product Warranties

The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. While
it engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the
quality of its component suppliers, the Company’s warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates and
material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates,
material usage or service delivery costs differ from management’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty
liability would be required.

Deferred Income Tax Asset Valuation Allowance

The deferred income tax asset reﬂects the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount
of assets and liabilities for ﬁnancial reporting purposes and for income tax purposes. A deferred income tax asset
is recognized if realization of such asset is more likely than not, based upon the weight of available evidence that
includes historical operating performance and the Company’s forecast of future operating performance. The
Company evaluates the realizability of its deferred income tax asset on a quarterly basis, and a valuation allowance
is provided, as necessary. During this evaluation, the Company reviews its forecasts of income in conjunction with
the positive and negative evidence surrounding the realizability of its deferred income tax asset to determine if a
valuation allowance is needed.

During ﬁscal years 2003 and 2002, the valuation allowance was reduced by an aggregate amount of $9,173,000,
substantially all of which related to tax beneﬁts associated with exercises of non-qualiﬁed stock options in prior
years and was therefore recognized by increasing additional paid-in capital. These reductions of the valuation
allowance in ﬁscal years 2003 and 2002 exhausted that portion of the valuation allowance that was related to tax
beneﬁts from option exercises. During ﬁscal 2004, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance was further reduced
by $1,405,000, which had the effect of reducing income tax expense by a corresponding amount. At February 28,
2004 the Company’s net deferred income tax asset was $6,763,000, which amount is net of a valuation allowance
of $630,000.

If in the future a portion or all of the $630,000 valuation allowance at February 28, 2004 is no longer deemed
to be necessary, reductions of the valuation allowance will decrease the income tax provision. Conversely, if in
the future the Company were to change its realization probability assessment to less than 50%, the Company would
provide an additional valuation allowance for all or a portion of the net deferred income tax asset, which would
increase the income tax provision.

13

Valuation of Long-lived Assets and Goodwill

The Company accounts for long-lived assets other than goodwill in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long Lived
Assets” (“SFAS 144”), which supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 and certain sections
of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 speciﬁc to discontinued operations. SFAS 144 classiﬁes long-lived
assets as either: (1) to be held and used; (2) to be disposed of by other than sale; or (3) to be disposed of by sale.
This standard introduces a probability-weighted cash ﬂow estimation approach to address situations where
alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or a range
is estimated for the amount of possible future cash ﬂows. The Company has adopted this statement, which has not
had a material impact on our ﬁnancial position or results of operations. SFAS 144 requires, among other things,
that an entity review its long-lived assets and certain related intangibles for impairment whenever changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. During ﬁscal 2004, the
Company recorded an impairment writedown of $739,000 on property and equipment which had become
underutilized due to increased outsourcing to contract manufacturers.

The Company also adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets”, on March 3, 2002 (the ﬁrst day of ﬁscal 2003). As a result, goodwill is no longer amortized,
but is subject to a transitional impairment analysis and is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently
as impairment indicators arise. The test for impairment involves the use of estimates related to the fair values of
the business operations with which goodwill is associated and is usually based on projected cash ﬂows or a market
value approach.

The Company believes the estimate of its valuation of long-lived assets and goodwill is a “critical accounting
estimate” because if circumstances arose that led to a decrease in the valuation it could have a material impact on
the Company’s results of operations.

Results of Operations, Fiscal Years 2002 Through 2004

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of sales represented by items included

in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations:

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses:

Research and development
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Settlement of litigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations before

income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gain on sale of discontinued Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended February 28,

2004

100.0%
86.3
13.7

2003

100.0%
79.5
20.5

2002

100.0%
77.8
22.2

4.2
1.8
3.1
4.6

—
(0.2)

4.4

—
4.4

—
4.4%

6.0
2.6
3.8
8.1

—
(0.2)

7.9

(2.8)
5.1

—
5.1%

7.3
3.4
6.3
5.2

(1.1)
—

4.1

(1.3)
2.8

1.6
4.4%

14

The Company’s sales and gross proﬁt by business segment for the last three years are as follows:

Segment

Satellite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wireless Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SALES BY SEGMENT

Year Ended February 28,

2004

2003

2002

$000s

$121,000
7,616
$128,616

% of
Total

$000s

% of
Total

$000s

94.1% $ 88,437
11,607
5.9%
100.0% $100,044

88.4% $ 78,899
11.6%
21,816
100.0% $100,715

% of
Total

78.3%
21.7%
100.0%

GROSS PROFIT BY SEGMENT

Segment

Satellite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wireless Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended February 28,

2004

2003

2002

$000s

$15,965
1,701
$17,666

% of
Total

$000s

% of
Total

$000s

90.4% $17,251
3,282
9.6%
100.0% $20,533

84.0% $15,469
6,904
16.0%
100.0% $22,373

% of
Total

69.1%
30.9%
100.0%

The Satellite business unit generates its revenue almost entirely from the sale of outdoor reception equipment
for use with subscription satellite television programming services. Such products accounted for 98% to 99% of
Satellite segment revenues in ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002. The remaining revenue of the Satellite segment
in these ﬁscal years was generated from the sale of commercial satellite products for video and data reception.

Revenue of the Wireless Access business segment revenue by product type for the last three years is as follows

(in $000s):

Wireless television products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Broadband wireless access antenna transceivers . . . . . . . .
Total Wireless Access segment revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Year 2004 compared to Fiscal Year 2003

Sales

Fiscal year ended February 28,

2004

$5,722
1,894
$7,616

2003

$10,004
1,603
$11,607

2002

$ 4,867
16,949
$21,816

Substantially all of the Company’s Satellite sales consist of outdoor reception equipment for the U.S. Direct
Broadcast Satellite (DBS) industry. Sales of Satellite products increased $32,563,000, or 37%, in ﬁscal 2004 from
ﬁscal 2003. This increase resulted primarily from substantially higher customer orders in ﬁscal 2004 for the latest
generation integrated ampliﬁer/downconverter products (referred to in the industry as Low Noise Block Feeds or
“LNBFs”), which have higher average selling prices compared to earlier generation LNBF products. Also, Satellite
revenues in the second half of ﬁscal 2003 were depressed because of lower unit sales of LNBF products caused
by a delay in obtaining customer acceptance of new product designs that were approved in the latter part of ﬁscal
2003’s third quarter. A new LNBF product was introduced during ﬁscal 2004 which generated sales of $8.8 million.
Also, the number of units sold in ﬁscal 2004 for all other LNBF products was approximately 13% higher than in
ﬁscal 2003, and the average selling price of these other LNBF products increased by approximately 16% in ﬁscal
2004 compared to ﬁscal 2003.

Sales of Wireless Access products in ﬁscal 2004 declined by $3,991,000, or 34%, from ﬁscal 2003. This decline

resulted mainly because ﬁscal 2003’s revenue included several large sales that were nonrecurring.

15

Gross Proﬁt and Gross Margins

In ﬁscal 2004, Satellite gross proﬁt declined by $1,286,000, or 7%, from ﬁscal 2003, and gross margin declined
to 13.2% this year from 19.5% in ﬁscal 2003. Despite the fact that Satellite sales in ﬁscal 2004 are 37% higher
than in ﬁscal 2003, the quarter-to-quarter volatility of sales in the ﬁscal 2004 was extreme, ranging from a low
of $16.6 million in the ﬁrst quarter and a high of $42.6 million in the third quarter. This volatility in sales, which
caused similar volatility in manufacturing activity, was caused by rapid shifts in demand on the part of the two
U.S. DBS service providers. This required the Company to make a rapid contraction in production capability in
the ﬁrst quarter, and a rapid expansion of production capability in the third quarter, all of which adversely affected
manufacturing efﬁciencies and gross margins.

Also contributing to the declines in Satellite gross proﬁt and gross margin in ﬁscal 2004 was the effect of
persistent competitive pricing pressures on certain Satellite products and signiﬁcantly higher freight costs incurred
for the procurement of raw materials and subassemblies in the third quarter of ﬁscal 2004. In addition, included
in Satellite cost of sales for ﬁscal 2004 were asset impairment writedowns of $739,000 on property and equipment
which had become underutilized due to increased outsourcing to contract manufacturers, and a lower of cost or
market inventory writedown of $242,000.

Wireless Access gross proﬁt decreased $1,581,000, or 48%, and gross margin for Wireless Access products
decreased to 22.3% in ﬁscal 2004 from 28.3% in ﬁscal 2003. The decline in Wireless Access gross proﬁt was
primarily due to the 34% year-over-year decrease in sales. The decline in Wireless gross margin in the latest year
is also attributable to the decrease in Wireless sales, which resulted in higher unabsorbed ﬁxed overhead costs that
are included in cost of sales.

See also Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements for additional operating data by

business segment.

Operating Expenses

Research and development expense decreased by $619,000, or 10%, from $5,982,000 in ﬁscal 2003 to
$5,363,000 in ﬁscal 2004. The decline in R&D expense in ﬁscal 2004 is due in part to the cancellation, in the third
quarter of ﬁscal 2003, of a product development contract for broadband wireless application speciﬁc integrated
circuits (ASICs) because the market timing for large scale deployment of this technology was considered to be
uncertain in the near-term future. This cancellation resulted in a reduction of approximately $345,000 in outside
service expense in ﬁscal 2004. Also contributing to the decline in R&D expense in ﬁscal 2004 was lower salaries
expense due to stafﬁng reductions ($420,000).

Selling expense decreased by $224,000, or 9%, in ﬁscal 2004 to $2,336,000 from $2,560,000 in ﬁscal 2003.
This decrease is primarily due to the fact that bad debts expense for ﬁscal 2003 included a charge of $258,000 to
write down the carrying amount of an available-for-sale investment in common stock that had been received in
ﬁscal 2002 in satisfaction of an accounts receivable balance from a customer that went through a legal
reorganization.

General and administrative expense increased by $203,000 in ﬁscal 2004 compared to ﬁscal 2003. This increase
was primarily due to the Company’s relocation of its facilities in Ventura County, California during the fourth quarter
of ﬁscal 2004. Expense incurred in connection with this relocation amounted to approximately $255,000.

Non-operating Expense, Net

Net non-operating expense increased by $28,000 from $215,000 in ﬁscal 2003 to $243,000 in ﬁscal 2004. This
increase in net non-operating expense is primarily attributable to a decline in foreign currency gains from $97,000
in ﬁscal 2003 to $75,000 in ﬁscal 2004.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 0.5% and 35.5% in ﬁscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decline
in effective tax rate is attributable primarily to the fact that, in ﬁscal 2004, reductions in the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance had a corresponding impact on the income tax provision. Prior to ﬁscal 2004, reductions of

16

the deferred tax asset valuation allowance were offset by increases in additional paid-in capital, and accordingly
the effective income tax rate in ﬁscal 2003 was not impacted by adjustments to the valuation allowance. See further
discussion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance in Note 7 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial
statements. In ﬁscal 2005, the effective income tax rate is expected to revert to a more normal level because the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance was substantially eliminated by the end of ﬁscal 2004.

Fiscal Year 2003 compared to Fiscal Year 2002

Sales

Sales of Satellite products increased $9,538,000, or 12.1% in ﬁscal 2003 from ﬁscal 2002. This increase
resulted from the acquisition of the Kaul-Tronics satellite antenna dish business on April 5, 2002, as further
described in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements. The acquired Kaul-Tronics business
accounted for approximately $16 million of Satellite segment sales during ﬁscal 2003, substantially all of which
consisted of antenna dishes and associated mounting hardware. Partially offsetting the ﬁscal 2003 revenue
contribution of the Kaul-Tronics business was a decline in revenue from the sale of LNBFs due to a decline of
approximately 8% in units sold. The average selling price of LNBFs in ﬁscal 2003 was relatively unchanged from
ﬁscal 2002.

Sales of Wireless Access products in ﬁscal 2003 decreased $10,209,000, or 47%, from ﬁscal 2002. This is
the net result of a $15,346,000 decline in sales of broadband wireless access antenna transceivers and a $5,137,000
increase in sales of Wireless Cable television products. The decline in broadband wireless transceivers is attributable
to a combination of the general slowdown in capital spending in the telecommunications industry and the
anticipation of next generation non-line of sight broadband wireless products. The Company does not anticipate
that its Wireless Access sales will increase appreciably until the broadband wireless service providers resume the
expansion of their subscriber bases. In response to the substantial decline in its broadband wireless product line,
the Company’s Wireless Access unit concentrated its sales efforts on foreign Wireless Cable television system
operators, and was able to grow this portion of its Wireless business in ﬁscal 2003 despite the fact that the overall
Wireless Cable television market is declining.

Gross Proﬁt and Gross Margins

Satellite gross proﬁt increased $1,782,000, or 11.5%, while gross margin for Satellite products was stable year
over year (19.5% and 19.6% in ﬁscal 2003 and ﬁscal 2002, respectively). Beneﬁting ﬁscal 2003 gross proﬁt and
gross margin were cost reductions on existing Satellite products arising from product design changes and negotiated
price reductions on raw material components. However, the positive impact of these cost reductions were largely
offset by several negative factors, speciﬁcally: production inefﬁciencies caused by delays in receiving materials
during and after the West Coast dockworkers lockout; lower average selling prices for mature LNBF products; costs
associated with production ramp-up of new Satellite products; raw steel price increases during ﬁscal 2003; and costs
in the aggregate amount of approximately $450,000 associated with a Satellite product replacement program in
the fourth quarter of ﬁscal 2003.

Since the fourth quarter of ﬁscal 2004, the price of raw steel, which is a key material for the Company’s satellite
dish antenna products, has increased substantially, which could adversely affect proﬁt margins in ﬁscal 2005. The
Company is taking steps to minimize the impact of these cost increases by, among other things, passing through
these cost increases to customers to the extent possible given competitive market conditions.

Wireless Access gross proﬁt decreased $3,622,000, or 52%, while gross margin for Wireless Access products
declined to 28.3% in ﬁscal 2003 from 31.6% in ﬁscal 2002. These declines are primarily attributable to the 47%
decrease in Wireless sales and the resultant higher unabsorbed ﬁxed overhead costs that are included in cost of sales.

Operating Expenses

Research and development expenses decreased by $1,355,000, or 18%, from $7,337,000 in ﬁscal year 2002
to $5,982,000 in ﬁscal year 2003. This decline is primarily due to headcount reductions and a reduced level of
subcontracted product development expenses of the Wireless Access business segment in ﬁscal 2003. In the second
quarter of ﬁscal 2003, the Company cancelled a product development contract for broadband wireless application

17

speciﬁc integrated circuits (ASICs) because the market timing for large scale deployment of this technology was
uncertain in the near-term future. As a result of this cancellation, expense associated with this product development
contract was $384,000 less in ﬁscal 2003 compared to ﬁscal 2002.

Selling expenses decreased by $896,000 from $3,456,000 in ﬁscal year 2002 to $2,560,000 in ﬁscal year 2003.
The decrease occurred primarily because ﬁscal 2002 selling expense included the write-off of a receivable from
a customer of the Company’s Wireless Access business unit in the amount of $817,000.

General and administrative expense decreased by $2,540,000 to $3,781,000 in ﬁscal 2003 from $6,321,000
in ﬁscal 2002. This decrease was due primarily to lower accounting and legal expenses of $1,365,000, lower
consulting expense of $182,000, lower employee recruiting and relocation expenses of $239,000, lower goodwill
amortization expense of $270,000 (because beginning in ﬁscal 2003 goodwill is no longer amortized, as discussed
further in Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements), and lower incentive compensation expense
of $104,000. Another factor contributing $215,000 to this year-to-year change is that G&A expense for ﬁscal 2002
includes a loss on sale of equipment of $58,000, while G&A expense for ﬁscal 2003 includes a gain on sale of
equipment of $157,000. Contributing to the year-to-year declines for accounting, legal and consulting expenses
discussed above were the fact that these professional service expenses for ﬁscal 2002 included approximately
$950,000 associated with the restatement of the Company’s ﬁscal 2000 and interim ﬁscal 2001 ﬁnancial statements.
Remaining reductions in professional service fees in ﬁscal 2003 compared to ﬁscal 2002 are primarily because ﬁscal
2002 amounts included legal fees in connection with several litigation matters, and because ﬁscal 2002 accounting
expense includes audit fees for redundant services due to the Company’s decision to terminate Arthur Andersen
and to engage KPMG to audit the ﬁscal 2002 ﬁnancial statements after Arthur Andersen had already begun its work
on that audit.

Operating income increased by $2,951,000 from $5,259,000 in ﬁscal year 2002 to $8,210,000 in ﬁscal year
2003. The principal reasons for the improvement are as described above—a $1.8 million decrease in gross proﬁt,
offset by a $4.8 million decrease in operating expenses.

Litigation Settlement

The “settlement of litigation” expense in the amount of $1,125,000 for ﬁscal 2002 represents an accrued
settlement of $925,000 for litigation brought against the Company as a result of the ﬁscal 2000 and 2001 ﬁnancial
misstatements caused by the Company’s former controller, and an accrual of $200,000 for a refund payable to an
insurance company involving a legal settlement reached in March 2000.

Income Tax Provision and Deferred Income Tax Asset

The effective tax rates for ﬁscal 2003 and 2002 were 35.5% and 31.3%, respectively. The increase in the
effective tax rate in ﬁscal 2003 compared to ﬁscal 2002 was attributable primarily to state income tax rate changes.

The deferred income tax asset valuation allowance was established in years prior to ﬁscal 2002 because
management believed at the time that it did not have the basis to conclude that it was more likely than not that
the deferred income tax asset would be fully realized in the future. Based on proﬁtable operations in the most recent
three year period, and on management’s internal forecast of future operating results, management believed that it
was more likely than not that the Company would generate sufﬁcient taxable income subsequent to ﬁscal 2003 to
utilize deferred tax assets of $6,530,000, and accordingly the deferred tax asset valuation allowance was reduced
by $5,389,000 during ﬁscal 2003. Because that portion of the valuation allowance that was reduced during ﬁscal
2003 was associated with tax deductions on non-qualiﬁed employee stock options which were exercised in earlier
years, the valuation allowance was reduced with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are its cash and cash equivalents, which amounted to $22,885,000
at February 28, 2004, and its $10 million working capital line of credit with a bank. During ﬁscal year 2004, cash and
cash equivalents increased by $938,000. This net increase consisted of cash provided by operating activities of
$5,094,000, proceeds from sale of property and equipment of $2,201,000, and proceeds from stock option exercises
of $617,000, less cash used for capital expenditures of $2,693,000 and net repayments of debt of $4,281,000.

18

Cash was used by an increase in operating working capital during ﬁscal 2004 in the aggregate amount of
$4,729,000, comprised of a $2,351,000 increase in accounts receivable, a $7,391,000 increase in inventories, a
$573,000 increase in prepaid expenses and other assets, and a decrease of $256,000 in accrued liabilities, partially
offset by an increase of $5,842,000 in accounts payable.

The Company believes that inﬂation and foreign currency exchange rates did not have a material effect on
its operations in ﬁscal 2004. The Company believes that ﬁscal year 2005 will not be impacted signiﬁcantly by foreign
exchange since a signiﬁcant portion of the Company’s sales are to U.S. markets, or to international markets where
its sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.

At February 28, 2004 the Company had a $10 million working capital line of credit with a commercial bank
that matures on August 3, 2005. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% or the bank’s
prime rate, and are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. At February 28, 2004, $1 million was
outstanding on this line of credit which is classiﬁed as long-term at that date. At February 28, 2003, there were
no outstanding borrowings under the line of credit. At February 28, 2004 and 2003, amounts reserved under the
line of credit for outstanding irrevocable stand-by letters of credit were $2,479,000 and $1,582,000, respectively.
The Company also has two term loans with this bank that had an aggregate outstanding principal balance of
$10,293,000 at February 28, 2004, as further described in Note 6 to the consolidated ﬁnancial statements.

The bank credit agreement that encompasses the working capital line of credit and the two bank term loans
contains certain ﬁnancial covenants and ratios that the Company is required to maintain, including a ﬁxed charge
coverage ratio of not less than 1.25, a current ratio of not less than 2.0, a leverage ratio of not more than 2.25, tangible
net worth of at least $19,050,000 (such minimum amount increasing by $1 million annually beginning on March 1,
2003), cash and cash equivalents not less than $8 million, and net income of at least $1.00 in each ﬁscal year. At
February 28, 2004 and 2003, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The bank credit agreement
contains a subjective acceleration clause that enables the bank to call the loans in the event of a material adverse
change (as deﬁned) in the Company’s business. Based on the Company’s history of proﬁtable operations and positive
operating cash ﬂow over the past four years, and based on the Company’s internal ﬁnancial forecasts for the next
year, the Company does not believe it is probable that the bank will assert the material adverse change clause in
the next 12 months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

Following is a summary of the Company’s contractual cash obligations as of February 28, 2004 (in thousands):

Future Cash Payments Due by Fiscal Year

Contractual Obligations

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

There-
after

Total

Debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total contractual cash obligations .

$ 3,603
697
27,148
$31,448

$3,823
732
—
$4,555

$2,139
732
—
$2,871

$1,728
741
—
$2,469

$ — $ — $11,293
5,539
1,874
27,148
—
$43,980
$1,874

763
—
$763

Purchase obligations consists of obligations under non-cancelable purchase orders, primarily for inventory

purchases of raw materials, components and subassemblies.

The Company believes that cash ﬂow from operations, together with amounts available under its working
capital line of credit, are sufﬁcient to support operations, fund capital equipment requirements and discharge
contractual cash obligations.

New Authoritative Pronouncements

See Note 1 of the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements for a description of new authoritative
accounting pronouncements either recently adopted or which had not yet been adopted by the Company as of the
end of ﬁscal 2004.

19

Forward Looking Statements

Forward looking statements in this Form 10-K which include, without limitation, statements relating to the
Company’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions, projections and other information regarding future
performance, are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. The words “may” “could”, “plans”, “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reﬂect the Company’s current views with
respect to future events and ﬁnancial performance and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including,
without limitation, product demand, market growth, new competition, competitive pricing and continued pricing
declines in the DBS market, supplier constraints, manufacturing yields, the ability to manage cost increases in
inventory materials including raw steel, timing and market acceptance of new product introductions, new
technologies, the ability to successfully integrate the acquisition of Vytek Corporation that was completed on
April 12, 2004, and other risks and uncertainties that are set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s
registration statement on Form S-4 (number 333-112851) as ﬁled with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 13, 2004. Such risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from historical
results or those anticipated. Although the Company believes the expectations reﬂected in such forward-looking
statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained.
The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. At February 28, 2004, the Company’s term
debt and credit facility with its bank are subject to variable interest rates. The Company monitors its debt and interest
bearing cash equivalents levels to mitigate the risk of interest rate ﬂuctuations. A ﬂuctuation of one percent in interest
rates would have an annual impact of approximately $100,000 net of tax on the Company’s consolidated statement
of operations.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

20

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
California Ampliﬁer, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of California Ampliﬁer, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of February 28, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and
comprehensive income and cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 28, 2004. These
consolidated ﬁnancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated ﬁnancial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the ﬁnancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the ﬁnancial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and signiﬁcant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall ﬁnancial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated ﬁnancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the ﬁnancial position of California Ampliﬁer, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2004 and 2003, and the results
of its operations and its cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 28, 2004 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated ﬁnancial statements, the Company implemented Statement of

Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on March 3, 2002.

/s/KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 6, 2004, except as to Note 16,
which is as of April 12, 2004

21

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PAR VALUE)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $211

and $273 at February 28, 2004 and 2003, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, equipment and improvements, net of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax assets, less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Current portion of long-term debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued payroll and employee beneﬁts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 3,000 shares authorized; no shares

issued or outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common Stock, $.01 par value; 30,000 shares authorized; 14,910 and
14,745 shares issued and outstanding at February 28, 2004 and
2003, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

February 28,

2004

2003

$22,885

$21,947

18,579
20,253
2,404
3,244
67,365

4,381
4,359
20,938
599
$97,642

$ 3,603
17,395
1,513
2,078
24,589
7,690

16,053
12,862
1,130
1,100
53,092

9,322
5,400
20,938
845
$89,597

$ 3,005
11,553
1,649
2,198
18,405
12,569

—

—

149
44,486
21,550
(822)
65,363
$97,642

147
43,441
15,836
(801)
58,623
$89,597

See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements.

22

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

Year ended February 28,

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses:

Research and development
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-operating income (expense):

Settlement of litigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Basic earnings per share:

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted earnings per share:

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2004

$128,616
110,950
17,666

5,363
2,336
3,984
11,683
5,983

—
(243)
(243)
5,740
(26)
5,714
—
—
$ 5,714

$

$

$

$

0.39
—
0.39

0.37
—
0.37

2003

$100,044
79,511
20,533

2002

$100,715
78,342
22,373

5,982
2,560
3,781
12,323
8,210

—
(215)
(215)
7,995
(2,835)
5,160
—
—
5,160

0.35
—
0.35

0.35
—
0.35

$

$

$

$

$

7,337
3,456
6,321
17,114
5,259

(1,125)
47
(1,078)
4,181
(1,307)
2,874
(25)
1,615
4,464

0.21
0.12
0.33

0.21
0.11
0.32

$

$

$

$

$

14,791

15,390

14,639

14,870

13,727

13,979

See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements.

23

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS)

Balances at February 28, 2001 . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation

adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . .
Tax beneﬁts from exercise of

non-qualiﬁed stock options . . . . .
Balances at February 28, 2002 . . . .
Net income and comprehensive

income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . .
Issuances of common stock . . . . . . .
Tax beneﬁts from exercise of

non-qualiﬁed stock options . . . . .
Balances at February 28, 2003 . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized loss on available-for-

sale investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . .
Tax beneﬁts from exercise of

non-qualiﬁed stock options . . . . .
Balances at February 28, 2004 . . . .

Common Stock

Shares

Amount

13,601
—

$136
—

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

$23,975
—

Retained
Earnings

$ 6,212
4,464

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

$(699)
—

—

29

—
13,630

—
64
1,051

—
14,745
—

—

165

—

—

—
136

—
1
10

—
147
—

—

2

—

69

3,525
27,569

—
159
10,074

5,639
43,441
—

—

615

—

—

—
10,676

5,160
—
—

—
15,836
5,714

—

—

(102)

—

—
(801)

—
—
—

—
(801)
—

(21)

—

Total

$29,624
4,464

(102)
4,362
69

3,525
37,580

5,160
160
10,084

5,639
58,623
5,714

(21)
5,693
617

—
14,910

—
$149

430
$44,486

—
$21,550

—
$(822)

430
$65,363

See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements.

24

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment impairment writedowns . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash litigation charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss on sale and disposal of equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in equity associated with tax beneﬁt from exercise

of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minority interest in loss of discontinued operation, net of tax .
Gain on sale of discontinued operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES . . . . . .
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of equipment and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of Kaul-Tronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING

Year ended February 28,

2004

2003

2002

$ 5,714

$ 5,160

$ 4,464

3,400
739
—
(227)

430
(233)
—
—

(2,351)
(7,391)
(573)
5,842
(256)
5,094

(2,693)
2,201
—
—

3,669
—
—
(157)

5,639
(2,950)
—
—

(7,834)
(2,360)
(61)
5,840
(1,467)
5,479

(1,670)
327
(16,534)
—

4,317
—
700
58

3,525
(2,233)
(24)
(1,615)

3,260
283
(880)
424
34
12,313

(1,534)
44
—
2,956

ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(492)

(17,877)

1,466

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from long-term debt
Debt repayments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING

ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EFFECT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,000
(5,281)
617

(3,664)
—
938
21,947
$22,885

12,000
(971)
160

11,189
—
(1,209)
23,156
$ 21,947

—
(599)
69

(530)
(102)
13,147
10,009
$23,156

See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements.

25

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING

POLICIES

Description of Business

California Ampliﬁer, Inc. (the “Company”) designs, manufactures and markets microwave equipment used
in the reception of television programming transmitted from satellites and wireless terrestrial transmission sites,
and two-way transceivers used for wireless high-speed Internet (broadband) service. The Company’s Satellite
business unit designs and markets reception products principally for the Direct Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”)
subscription television market in the United States, as well as a line of consumer and commercial products for video
and data reception. The Wireless Access business unit designs and markets integrated reception and two-way
transmission ﬁxed wireless equipment for broadband data and video applications.

As described further in Note 14, in July 2001 the Company sold its 51% interest in Micro Pulse, a company
engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of antennas and ampliﬁers used principally in global positioning
satellite (GPS) applications. Accordingly, the results of operations of Micro Pulse, which represented a separate
business segment of the Company, have been presented as a discontinued operation in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for ﬁscal year 2002.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated ﬁnancial statements include the accounts of the Company (a Delaware corporation) and its
wholly-owned French subsidiary, California Ampliﬁer SARL. All signiﬁcant intercompany transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.

Fiscal Year

The Company uses a 52-53 week ﬁscal year ending on the Saturday closest to February 28, which for ﬁscal
years 2004, 2003 and 2002 fell on February 28, 2004, March 1, 2003 and March 2, 2002, respectively. In these
consolidated ﬁnancial statements, the ﬁscal year end for all years is shown as February 28 for clarity of presentation.
Fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 all consisted of 52 weeks.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred,
the sales price is ﬁxed and determinable and collection of the sales price is probable. Generally, these criteria are
met at the time product is shipped, except for shipments made on the basis of “FOB Destination” terms, in which
case title transfers to the customer and the revenue is recorded by the Company when the shipment reaches the
customer. Customers do not have rights of return except for defective products returned during the warranty period.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and
Handling Fees and Costs”, the Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers as sales.
Shipping and handling fees included in sales for ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $345,000, $574,000 and
$224,000, respectively.

Concentrations of Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally
of money market instruments and trade receivables. The Company currently invests its excess cash in money market
mutual funds managed by or afﬁliated with its U.S. commercial bank. The Company had cash and cash equivalents

26

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING

POLICIES (Continued)

in one U.S. bank in excess of federally insured amounts. Cash and cash equivalents in U.S. and foreign banks is
as follows (in thousands):

U.S. banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

February 28,

2004

$22,280
605
$22,885

2003

$20,095
1,852
$21,947

Because the Company sells into markets dominated by a few large service providers, a signiﬁcant percentage
of consolidated sales and consolidated accounts receivable relate to a small number of customers. Sales to customers
which accounted for 10% or more of consolidated annual sales in any one of the last three years, as a percent of
consolidated sales, are as follows:

Customer

A
B
C
D
E

2004

39.4%
22.9%
5.9%
0.1%
—

Year ended February 28,

2003

43.8%
9.8%
9.5%
—
0.1%

2002

25.8%
0.2%
30.6%
13.5%
11.7%

The Company’s four largest customers in ﬁscal 2004, including one customer which does not appear in the

table above, accounted for approximately 77% of total sales in ﬁscal 2004.

Accounts receivable amounts at ﬁscal year-end from the customers referred to in the table above, expressed

as a percent of consolidated net accounts receivable, are as follows:

A
B
C

February 28,

2004

49.4%
22.0%
0.5%

2003

58.0%
5.5%
15.1%

Customers A, B, C and E are customers of the Satellite segment, while D is a customer of the Wireless

Access segment.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company establishes an allowance for estimated bad debts based upon a review and evaluation of speciﬁc
customer accounts identiﬁed as known and expected collection problems, based on historical experience, due to
insolvency, disputes or other collection issues. During ﬁscal 2002, the Company reserved for and wrote off accounts
receivable in the net amount of $817,000 due from a Wireless Access customer.

Inventories

Inventories include costs of materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventories are stated at the lower

of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined principally by the use of the ﬁrst-in, ﬁrst-out method.

27

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING

POLICIES (Continued)

Investments

The Company classiﬁes investments in one of three categories: trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity.
Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Held-to-maturity
securities are those securities that the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other securities
not included in trading or held-to-maturity are classiﬁed as available-for-sale.

Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of
premiums or discounts. Unrealized holding gains and losses on trading securities are included in earnings.
Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from
earnings and are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until realized, or until
holding losses are deemed to be permanent, at which time an impairment charge is recorded.

At February 28, 2004 and 2003, the Company had no trading or held-to-maturity investments. Its sole
available-for-sale investment, acquired in connection with the settlement during ﬁscal year 2002 of a former
customer’s outstanding accounts receivable balance, had a carrying value of $24,000 and $87,000 at February 28,
2004 and 2003, respectively, and is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying
balance sheet at those dates. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $258,000 on this investment during
ﬁscal 2003, which is included in selling expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations because
the investment asset had been initially recorded in ﬁscal 2002 with an offsetting reduction of bad debts expense,
which is also classiﬁed as a selling expense. During ﬁscal 2004, the Company sold a portion of this investment,
which generated net cash proceeds of $29,000. At February 28, 2004, the Company had an unrealized holding
loss of $21,000 for this available-for-sale investment that is carried as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss.

Property, equipment and improvements

Property, equipment and improvements are stated at cost. The Company follows the policy of capitalizing
expenditures that increase asset lives, and charging ordinary maintenance and repairs to operations, as incurred.
When assets are sold or disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and any resulting gain or loss is included in operating income.

Depreciation and amortization are based upon the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-
line method. Plant equipment and ofﬁce equipment are depreciated over useful lives ranging from two to ﬁve years,
while tooling is depreciated over 18 months. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease
term or the useful life of the improvements.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible
assets and identiﬁable intangible assets of businesses acquired. Through the end of ﬁscal 2002, goodwill was
amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. As a result of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, “Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets” effective March 3, 2002 (the ﬁrst day of ﬁscal 2003),
beginning in ﬁscal year 2003 goodwill is no longer being amortized. Instead, goodwill is evaluated periodically
for impairment pursuant to the provisions of this new pronouncement, as described in more detail under “New
Authoritative Pronouncements” below.

28

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING

POLICIES (Continued)

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets Other Than Goodwill

The Company reviews property and equipment and other long-lived assets other than goodwill for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability is measured by comparison of the asset’s carrying amount to the undiscounted future net cash ﬂows
an asset is expected to generate. If an asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured
by the amount at which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the projected discounted future cash ﬂows arising
from the asset.

Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of ﬁnancial

instrument for which it is practicable to estimate:

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable — The carrying amount is a reasonable

estimate of fair value given the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term debt — The carrying value approximates fair value since the interest rate on the long-term debt
approximates the interest rate which is currently available to the Company for the issuance of debt with similar
terms and maturities.

Warranty

The Company warrants its products against defects over periods ranging from 3 to 24 months. An accrual for
estimated future costs relating to products returned under warranty is recorded as an expense when products are
shipped. At the end of each quarter, the Company adjusts its liability for warranty claims based on its actual warranty
claims experience as a percentage of sales for the preceding three years. See Note 10 for a table of annual increases
in and reductions of the warranty liability for the last three years.

Deferred Income Tax Assets

Deferred income tax assets reﬂect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount
of assets and liabilities for ﬁnancial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. A deferred
income tax asset is recognized if realization of such asset is more likely than not, based upon the weight of available
evidence which includes historical operating performance and the Company’s forecast of future operating
performance. The Company evaluates the realizability of its deferred income tax assets on a quarterly basis, and
a valuation allowance is provided, as necessary, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting
for Income Taxes”. During this evaluation, the Company reviews its forecasts of income in conjunction with the
positive and negative evidence surrounding the realizability of its deferred income tax assets to determine if a
valuation allowance is needed.

Foreign Currency Translation and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Account

Historically, the Company’s French subsidiary used the local currency as its functional currency. The local
currency was the French franc until January 1, 2002 and the Euro beginning on that date. The ﬁnancial statements
of the French subsidiary were translated into U.S. dollars using current or historical exchange rates, as appropriate,
with translation gains or losses included in the accumulated other comprehensive loss account in the stockholders’
equity section of the consolidated balance sheet.

In connection with the conversion of the French subsidiary’s local currency from the franc to the Euro, the
Company evaluated which currency, the Euro or the U.S. dollar, is best suited to be used as the functional currency.
On the basis of this evaluation, management determined that the functional currency should be changed from the

29

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING

POLICIES (Continued)

Euro to the U.S. dollar, and this change was made effective February 1, 2002. As a result of this change, the foreign
currency translation account balance of $801,000 included in accumulated other comprehensive loss will remain
unchanged until such time as the French subsidiary ceases to be part of the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial
statements. No income tax expense or beneﬁt has been allocated to this component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss because the Company expects that undistributed earnings of this foreign subsidiary will be
reinvested indeﬁnitely.

The aggregate foreign exchange gains included in determining income from continuing operations were

$75,000, $97,000 and $11,000 in ﬁscal 2004, ﬁscal 2003 and ﬁscal 2002, respectively.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reﬂects the potential
dilution, using the treasury stock method, that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue Common Stock
were exercised or converted into Common Stock or resulted in the issuance of Common Stock that then shared
in the earnings of the Company. In computing diluted earnings per share, the treasury stock method assumes that
outstanding options are exercised and the proceeds are used to purchase common stock at the average market price
during the period. Options will have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market
price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options.

Accounting for Stock Options

As allowed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123”), the Company has elected
to continue to measure compensation cost under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”) and comply with the pro forma disclosure requirements of SFAS 123,
as set forth in Note 8.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied
the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands except per
share amounts):

Net income as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less total stock-based employee compensation

expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects . . . . . . . . . . .
Pro forma net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Earnings per share:

Basic —

Year ended February 28,

2004

$ 5,714

2003

$ 5,160

2002

$ 4,464

(2,672)
$ 3,042

(2,681)
$ 2,479

(4,494)
(30)

$

As reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pro forma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted —

As reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pro forma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$.39
$.21

$.37
$.20

$.35
$.17

$.35
$.17

$.33
$.00

$.32
$.00

30

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING

POLICIES (Continued)

Recent Authoritative Pronouncements

In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS 143”). SFAS 143 addresses ﬁnancial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs and applies
to all entities. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the
acquisition, construction, development and / or the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain
obligations of lessees. SFAS 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be
recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated
asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS 143 is effective
for ﬁnancial statements issued for ﬁscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS 143
in March 2003 (the beginning of its ﬁscal year 2004). The adoption of SFAS 143 did not have a material effect
on the Company’s results of operations, ﬁnancial position or liquidity.

In April 2002, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements
No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections”, which among other things
provides guidance in reporting gains and losses from extinguishments of debt and accounting for leases. The
Company adopted certain provisions of this statement in ﬁscal 2003, and the remaining provisions were adopted
in ﬁscal 2004. The adoption of this statement had no impact on the Company’s ﬁnancial position or its results
of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”
(“FIN 46”). FIN 46 clariﬁes the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial
Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling ﬁnancial
interest or do not have sufﬁcient equity at risk for the entity to ﬁnance its activities without additional subordinated
ﬁnancial support from other parties. The recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 46 are effective for newly
created variable interest entities formed after January 31, 2003, and for existing variable interest entities, on the
ﬁrst interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46 in the fourth quarter
of ﬁscal 2003 had no impact on the consolidated ﬁnancial statements. In December 2003, the FASB revised FIN
46 to exempt certain entities from its requirements and to clarify certain issues arising during the implementation
of FIN 46. The adoption of this revised interpretation in the fourth quarter of ﬁscal 2004 did not have any impact
on the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of ﬁnancial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the ﬁnancial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Areas where signiﬁcant judgments are made include, but are not limited to: allowance for doubtful accounts,
inventory valuation, product warranties, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, and valuation of long-lived
assets and goodwill. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

31

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2 — KAUL-TRONICS ACQUISITION

On April 5, 2002, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets, properties and business of Kaul-Tronics,
Inc., a Wisconsin corporation, and two afﬁliated companies (collectively, “Kaul-Tronics”). The results of Kaul-
Tronics’ operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements since that date. The
operations acquired by the Company involve primarily the design and manufacture of satellite antenna dishes used
in the DBS industry. The satellite antenna dishes of the type produced by Kaul-Tronics, and the downconverter/
ampliﬁer devices (“LNBFs”) of the type produced by the Company, together comprise the outdoor portion of
customer premise equipment for DBS television reception. In calendar year 2001, Kaul-Tronics had revenues of
approximately $36 million and pretax income of $4.8 million. Kaul-Tronics’ 2001 revenues included approximately
$12 million of LNBFs of the type produced by the Company.

The acquisition of Kaul-Tronics was motivated principally by the Company’s desire to vertically integrate into
the production and sale of DBS dish antennas, so that the Company can provide the entire outdoor portion of the
customer premise equipment and solidify its relationship with the satellite television system operators. Another
reason for the acquisition is that it provided the Company with new customers, speciﬁcally distributors of satellite
television reception products.

The total acquisition cost was $22,588,000, consisting of a cash payment to the sellers of $16,063,000, issuance
to the sellers of 929,086 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $6,054,000, and $471,000 for direct
costs of the acquisition including legal, accounting and ﬁnancial advisory fees. The acquisition gave rise to goodwill
of $17,651,000, which was assigned to the Company’s Satellite business segment. The value of the common shares
issued was determined based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the six trading
day period beginning two trading days before the acquisition was agreed to and ending two trading days after the
terms of the acquisition were announced.

Factors that contributed to a purchase price that resulted in the recognition of goodwill include the following:
(i) Kaul-Tronics has been engaged in designing, manufacturing and selling satellite television reception equipment
for approximately 20 years, during which time it became one of the largest suppliers of dish antennas to the U.S.
market; (ii) it had a reputation in the industry for high quality, reliable products, and it developed strong customer
relationships; (iii) Kaul-Tronics had a history of proﬁtable operations — in 1999, 2000 and 2001, Kaul-Tronics,
an S Corporation, had pretax income of $6,157,000, $3,236,000 and $4,798,000, respectively; and (iv) the agreed-
upon purchase price was supported by a fairness opinion issued by an independent ﬁnancial advisor.

The source of funds for the cash payment was the Company’s cash on hand and the proceeds of a $12 million
drawdown on the Company’s existing bank revolving line of credit which had been increased from $8 million to
$13 million effective April 3, 2002. On May 2, 2002, the $12 million outstanding principal balance on the revolver
was converted into a new $12 million term loan. This term loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% or the bank’s
prime rate.

Following is a computation of the goodwill arising from this acquisition (in thousands):

Total acquisition costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$22,588

Fair value of net assets acquired:

Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-compete agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities assumed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,030
4
675
3,323
400
(495)
Total fair value of net assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,937
$17,651

32

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2 — KAUL-TRONICS ACQUISITION (Continued)

The following pro forma information is presented as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of ﬁscal

2003 (in thousands):

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations per share:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended
February 28, 2003

As
reported

$100,044
$ 5,160

$
$

.35
.35

Pro
forma

$102,671
5,307
$

$
$

.36
.35

The “as reported” amounts for the year ended February 28, 2003 include the operating results of Kaul-Tronics
for the 11 month period beginning on the April 5, 2002 acquisition date. Pro forma adjustments for the year ended
February 28, 2003 consist mainly of adding Kaul-Tronics’ results for the month of March 2002.

Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 142, which the Company adopted effective at the beginning of ﬁscal 2003,
goodwill which arose from this transaction is not amortized. Instead, goodwill is evaluated on an annual basis for
impairment, as further discussed in Note 5. The goodwill arising from this acquisition is deductible for income taxes.

NOTE 3 — INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

February 28,

2004

$11,671
417
8,165
$20,253

2003

$ 9,627
—
3,235
$12,862

NOTE 4 — PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS

Property, equipment and improvements consist of the following (in thousands):

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plant equipment and tooling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ofﬁce equipment, computers and furniture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

February 28,

2004

2003

$

—
243
15,493
3,077
18,813
(14,432)

$

675
3,414
22,276
4,083
30,448
(21,126)

$ 4,381

$ 9,322

In April 2002, as part of the acquisition of the satellite dish manufacturing operation of Kaul-Tronics, Inc.
(as further described in Note 2), the Company acquired land and buildings in Wisconsin, consisting of two
manufacturing plants and one warehouse. During ﬁscal 2004, the Company outsourced this satellite dish
manufacturing operation to a non-afﬁliated metal fabrication company in the U.S. As a result of this outsourcing,
two of the three buildings in Wisconsin were sold during ﬁscal 2004. The third building, along with the associated

33

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 4 — PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS (Continued)

land and some manufacturing equipment no longer used in the business, is classiﬁed as property held for sale at
the end of ﬁscal 2004. The $1,476,000 carrying amount of property held for sale, which represents the estimated
net realizable value of this property and equipment, is included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets in
the consolidated balance sheet at February 28, 2004. A writedown of $165,000 to adjust the carrying amount of
property held for sale to net realizable value is included in cost of goods sold for ﬁscal 2004.

NOTE 5 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

As a result of adopting SFAS 142 at the beginning of ﬁscal 2003, the Company no longer records amortization
on goodwill. Prior to ﬁscal 2003, goodwill was being amortized at the rate of $270,000 per year. For the year ended
February 28, 2002, income from continuing operations and income from continuing operations per share adjusted
to exclude goodwill amortization expense is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

Income from continuing operations as reported . . . . . . . . .
Add back goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations as adjusted . . . . . . . . .

Income from continuing operations per share:

Basic —

As reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted —

As reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended
Feb. 28, 2002

$2,874
270
$3,144

$.21
$.23

$.21
$.22

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill in ﬁscal year 2003 is as follows (in thousands):

Balance as of February 28, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill acquired in April 2002 (Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance as of February 28, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 3,287
17,651
$20,938

There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill in ﬁscal year 2004.

All goodwill is associated with the Company’s Satellite business segment. The Company’s transitional
goodwill impairment test was conducted as of March 3, 2002 (the ﬁrst day of ﬁscal 2003). This test indicated that
there was no impairment of goodwill. The Company used a discounted cash ﬂow approach to estimate the fair value
of its Satellite reporting unit.

Annual goodwill impairment tests were conducted as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. These tests indicated
that there was no impairment of goodwill at those dates. The Company used a discounted cash ﬂow approach to
estimate the fair value of its Satellite reporting unit.

At February 28, 2004, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of covenants not to compete
acquired in conjunction with the Kaul-Tronics purchase (Note 2) was $400,000 and $200,000, respectively. The
covenants not to compete, which are included in Other Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at
February 28, 2004, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average life of approximately
4.1 years.

34

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 6 — FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS

Working capital line of credit

At February 28, 2004 the Company had a $10 million working capital line of credit with a commercial bank
that matures on August 3, 2005. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% or the bank’s
prime rate, and are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. At February 28, 2004, $1 million was
outstanding on this line of credit which is classiﬁed as long-term at that date. At February 28, 2003, there were
no outstanding borrowings under the line of credit. At February 28, 2004 and 2003, amounts reserved under the
line of credit for outstanding irrevocable stand-by letters of credit were $2,479,000 and $1,582,000, respectively.

Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

Bank term loan payable, interest ﬁxed at 4.75% until April 2, 2004

and thereafter ﬂoating at bank prime rate or ﬁxed at 1 or 3 month
LIBOR plus 2%, principal due in monthly installments ranging from
$85 to $86 through August 2, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Bank term loan payable, interest ﬂoating at LIBOR plus 2% or bank
prime rate, principal due in monthly installments of $150 through
April 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank working capital line of credit
Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less portion due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt

February 28,

2004

2003

$ 2,390

$ 3,574

7,903
1,000
11,293
(3,603)
$ 7,690

12,000
—
15,574
(3,005)
$12,569

The bank credit agreement that encompasses the working capital line of credit and the two bank term loans
contains certain ﬁnancial covenants and ratios that the Company is required to maintain, including a ﬁxed charge
coverage ratio of not less than 1.25, a current ratio of not less than 2.0, a leverage ratio of not more than 2.25, tangible
net worth of at least $19,050,000 (such minimum amount increasing by $1 million annually beginning on March 1,
2003), cash and cash equivalents not less than $8 million, and net income of at least $1.00 in each ﬁscal year. At
February 28, 2004 and 2003, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The bank credit agreement
requires the Company to make an annual accelerated principal payment on the term loan that matures in April 2008,
above and beyond scheduled monthly principal payments, in an amount equal to 25% of “free cash ﬂow” (as deﬁned
in the agreement) in the immediately preceding ﬁscal year. Pursuant to this provision, the Company has included
$775,000 in the current portion of long-term debt at February 28, 2004. The due date for this accelerated principal
payment is August 31, 2004.

The bank credit agreement contains a subjective acceleration clause that enables the bank to call the loans
in the event of a material adverse change (as deﬁned) in the Company’s business. Based on the Company’s history
of proﬁtable operations and positive operating cash ﬂow over the past four years, and based on the Company’s
internal ﬁnancial forecasts for the next year, the Company does not believe it is probable that the bank will assert
the material adverse change clause in the next 12 months.

35

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 6 — FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

Contractual Cash Obligations

Following is a summary of the Company’s contractual cash obligations as of February 28, 2004 (in thousands):

Future Cash Payments Due by Fiscal Year

Contractual Obligations

Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total contractual cash obligations . . . .

2005

$ 3,603
697
27,148

$31,448

2006

$3,823
732
—

$4,555

2007

$2,139
732
—

$2,871

2008

$1,728
741
—

$2,469

2009

$ —
763
—

$763

There-
after

$ —
1,874
—

$1,874

Total

$11,293
5,539
27,148

$43,980

Purchase obligations consists of obligations under non-cancelable purchase orders, primarily for inventory

purchases of raw materials, components and subassemblies.

Rent expense under operating leases was $929,000, $760,000 and $1,062,000 for ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and

2002, respectively.

NOTE 7 — INCOME TAXES

The Company’s income from continuing operations before income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended February 28,

2004

$5,649
91
$5,740

2003

$7,642
353
$7,995

2002

$3,930
251
$4,181

The tax provision for income from continuing operations consists of the following (in thousands):

Current:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Charge in lieu of taxes attributable to tax beneﬁt

from employee stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended February 28,

2004

2003

2002

$ (49)
1
(124)
(172)

245
(477)
—
(232)

430
$ 26

$

59
79
(57)
81

(2,395)
(490)
—
(2,885)

5,639
$ 2,835

$ (132)
(271)
9
(394)

(725)
(1,099)
—
(1,824)

3,525
$ 1,307

36

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 7 — INCOME TAXES (Continued)

Differences between the income tax provision and income taxes computed using the statutory federal income

tax rate are as follows (in thousands):

Income tax at statutory federal rate (34%) . . . . . . . . . . .
State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect
. .
Foreign taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extraterritorial income exclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended February 28,

2004

$ 1,952
193
(155)
(1,405)
(517)
(14)
(28)
26

$

2003

$2,718
106
(176)
505
(264)
(68)
14
$2,835

2002

$1,421
(194)
38
230
(154)
(102)
68
$1,307

The components of the net deferred income tax asset at February 28, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (in thousands):

Inventory reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warranty reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation and vacation accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capitalized R&D cost amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carryforward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

February 28,

2004

$

221
84
63
121
(274)
(1,099)
400
2,876
2,803
1,803
395
7,393
(630)
6,763
(2,404)
$ 4,359

2003

$

273
80
196
139
120
(499)
495
3,397
2,701
1,220
443
8,565
(2,035)
6,530
(1,130)
$ 5,400

At February 28, 2004, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $12.1
million and $790,000 for federal and state purposes, respectively. The federal NOLs expire at various dates through
2022, and the state NOLs expire at various dates through 2009.

As of February 28, 2004, the Company had foreign tax credit carryforwards of $633,000 expiring at various
dates through 2008, research and development tax credit carryforwards of $1,839,000 and $1,461,000 for federal
and state income tax purposes, respectively, expiring at various dates through 2014, and manufacturing investment
credit carryforwards of $1,016,000 for state income tax purposes expiring at various dates through 2014.

During ﬁscal years 2003 and 2002, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance was reduced by an aggregate
amount of $9,173,000, substantially all of which related to tax beneﬁts associated with exercises of non-qualiﬁed
stock options in prior years and was therefore recognized by increasing additional paid-in capital. These reductions
of the valuation allowance in ﬁscal years 2003 and 2002 exhausted that portion of the valuation allowance that
was related to tax beneﬁts from option exercises. In ﬁscal 2004, on the basis of management’s updated assessment
of the future realizability of the deferred tax assets, the valuation allowance was further reduced by $1,405,000,

37

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 7 — INCOME TAXES (Continued)

which had the effect of reducing the income tax provision by a corresponding amount. At February 28, 2004 the
Company’s net deferred income tax asset was $6,763,000, which amount is net of a valuation allowance of $630,000.

The Company has not provided withholdings and U.S. federal income taxes on approximately $485,000 of
undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries because such earnings are or will be reinvested indeﬁnitely in such
subsidiaries or will be approximately offset by credits for foreign taxes paid. It is not practical to determine the
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, that would be payable if such earnings were not reinvested indeﬁnitely.

NOTE 8 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Stock Options

The Company has two stock option plans for its employees, the 1989 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (“1989
Plan”), and the 1999 Stock Option Plan (“1999 Plan”). Under the 1999 Plan, stock options can be granted at prices
not less than 100% of the fair market value at the date of grant. Option grants become exercisable on a vesting
schedule established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the time of grant, usually over
a four-year period.

The following table summarizes the option activity for ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands except

dollar amounts):

Outstanding at February 28, 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at February 28, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at February 28, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at February 28, 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number
Shares

1,794
754
(29)
(315)
2,204
341
(64)
(169)
2,312
534
(165)
(103)
2,578

Weighted
Average
Option Price

$15.85
4.68
2.34
23.06
$11.17
5.22
2.53
11.44
$10.51
6.95
3.73
14.46
$10.05

38

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

Options outstanding at February 28, 2004 and related weighted average price and life information is as follows:

Range of
Exercise
Prices

$ 1.75 – $ 1.88
2.06 –
2.76
3.16 –
4.99
7.22
5.00 –
8.00 – 10.88
12.25 – 14.76
15.75 – 19.88
20.19 – 27.44
39.38 – 40.00
43.50 – 50.56
$ 1.75 – $50.56

Total
Options
Outstanding

155,500
193,250
1,023,050
533,088
73,750
172,000
102,500
58,000
115,000
152,000
2,578,138

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)

4.8
4.0
7.3
6.4
5.1
10.0
6.3
5.4
6.0
6.1
6.6

Total
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 1.79
2.25
3.99
5.66
8.86
14.75
19.49
25.43
39.97
44.99
$10.05

Options
Exercisable

155,500
193,250
553,550
336,588
73,750
750
79,500
53,000
113,750
122,000
1,681,638

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 1.79
2.25
4.35
5.99
8.86
12.25
19.38
25.48
39.98
45.35
$11.16

The weighted average fair value for stock options granted in ﬁscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $6.15, $4.48

and $4.58, respectively.

The number of stock options available for grant under the 1999 Stock Option Plan at the end of each ﬁscal
year was 62,250, 308,000 and 19,899 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Pursuant to the Company’s 1999 Stock
Option Plan, the number of options available to grant is replenished to 500,000 on the ﬁrst day of each ﬁscal year.
The 1989 Plan expired in May 1999 and no additional options may be granted under this plan.

As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company continues to apply the accounting rules of APB No. 25 governing
the recognition of compensation expense for options granted under its stock option plans. Such accounting rules
measure compensation expense on the ﬁrst date at which both the number of shares and the exercise price are known.
Under the Company’s plans, this would typically be the grant date. To the extent that the exercise price equals or
exceeds the market value of the stock on the grant date, no expense is recognized. As options are generally granted
at exercise prices not less than the market value on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized under
this accounting treatment in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of options at date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with

the following assumptions:

Expected life (years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended February 28,

2004

5
0%

2003

5
0%

2002

10

0%

The range for interest rates is 2.58% to 6.82%, and the range for volatility is 49% to 147%. The estimated
stock-based compensation cost calculated using the assumptions indicated totaled $3,686,000, $4,155,000 and
$6,713,000 in ﬁscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

At February 28, 2004, 14,909,512 preferred stock purchase rights are outstanding. Each right may be exercised
to purchase one-hundredth of a share of Series A Participating Junior Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $50
per right, subject to adjustment. The rights may be exercised only after commencement or public announcement
that a person (other than a person receiving prior approval from the Company) has acquired or obtained the right

39

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

to acquire 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The rights, which do not have voting rights,
may be redeemed by the Company at a price of $.01 per right within ten days after the announcement that a person
has acquired 20% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Company. In the event that the Company is
acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction, provision shall be made so that each holder of a
right shall have the right to receive that number of shares of common stock of the surviving company which at
the time of the transaction would have a market value of two times the exercise price of the right. 750,000 shares
of Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, are authorized.

NOTE 9 — EARNINGS PER SHARE

Following is a summary of the calculation of basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding for ﬁscal

2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

Year ended February 28,

2004

2003

2002

Weighted average shares:

Weighted average number of common shares

outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14,791

14,591

13,605

Weighted average number of shares issuable for

legal settlement
Basic weighted average number of common

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

48

122

shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14,791

14,639

13,727

Effect of dilutive securities:

Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted weighted average number of common

599

231

252

shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,390

14,870

13,979

Outstanding stock options in the amount of 1,220,000, 1,128,000 and 828,000 at February 28, 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, which had exercise prices ranging from $3.69 to $50.56, $4.95 to $50.56 and $5.69 to $50.56,
respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the years then ended because
the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of the Common Stock and accordingly
the effect of inclusion would be antidilutive.

NOTE 10 — OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

“Net cash provided by operating activities” in the consolidated statements of cash ﬂows includes cash payments

for interest and income as follows (in thousands):

Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes paid (net refunds received) . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended February 28,

2004

$ 527
$(170)

2003

$588
$262

2002

$323
$497

Following is the supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and ﬁnancing activities (in thousands):

Increase in valuation allowance for available-for-sale
investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Issuance of common stock as partial consideration

for acquisition of Kaul-Tronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock to reduce accrued liability .

40

Year ended February 28,

2003

—

$6,054
$4,030

2002

$—

$—
$—

2004

$21

$—
$—

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10 — OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves

Following is the Company’s schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves for the last three years

(in thousands):

Balance at
beginning
of period

Charged
(credited)
to costs and
expenses

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

Fiscal 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Warranty reserve:

Fiscal 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$467
417
273

$447
376
491

$991
(96)
34

$144
396
164

Deductions

$(1,041)
(48)
(96)

$ (215)
(281)
(496)

Balance
at end
of period

$417
273
211

$376
491
159

At February 28, 2003, the Company accrued warranty cost of $250,000 in connection with a claim from a
customer involving a potential product replacement program. This amount was reversed out of the warranty reserve
at February 28, 2004. See Note 11 for further description of this matter.

NOTE 11 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases its corporate ofﬁce and manufacturing plant in Ventura County, California under an
operating lease that expires June 30, 2011. The lease agreement requires the Company to pay all maintenance,
property taxes and insurance premiums associated with the building. In addition, the Company leases small facilities
in Minnesota and France. The Company also leases certain manufacturing equipment and ofﬁce equipment under
operating lease arrangements. A summary of future operating lease commitments is included in the contractual cash
obligations table in Note 6.

In March 2003, one of the Company’s customers made a $1.6 million claim against the Company for what
the customer described as its expected costs for a replacement program involving a product that had been supplied
by the Company. The Company accrued $250,000 at February 28, 2003 as its best estimate of the costs to resolve
this matter. This $250,000 accrual was reversed by the Company at February 28, 2004 because the customer that
made the claim did not provide any data to support its claim, and the Company accordingly concluded that the
matter was closed.

NOTE 12 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Yourish class action litigation:

In March 2000, the Company entered into a settlement agreement in the class action securities litigation entitled
Yourish v. California Ampliﬁer, Inc., et al. The ﬁnal portion of the settlement amount, consisting of 121,875 shares
of Company common stock, that previously were accrued as part of the Yourish legal settlement at $33.063 per
share, were issued on July 24, 2002, upon receipt of instructions from plaintiffs’ counsel. The primary amount of
the settlement was expensed by the Company in ﬁscal 2000. The Company also expensed $200,000 for this litigation
settlement in the ﬁscal year ended February 2002 as a result of having to repay a settlement contribution from an
insurance company.

2001 securities litigation:

Following the announcement by the Company in March 2001 of the resignation of its controller and
misstatements of the ﬁscal 2000 and 2001 ﬁnancial statements, the Company and certain ofﬁcers were named as

41

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

defendants in separate lawsuits that were subsequently combined into a single action. In December 2001, the parties
reached an agreement to settle this litigation for $1.5 million. Of this amount, the Company’s directors and ofﬁcers
liability insurance carrier agreed to contribute $575,000 toward the settlement, which amount was paid in December
2001. The Company accrued its $925,000 share of the settlement in the ﬁscal year ended February 28, 2002. Of
this amount, $425,000 was paid by the Company in December 2001, and the remaining $500,000 was paid in
October 2002 upon the Court’s ﬁnal approval of the settlement agreement.

Investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission:

In May 2001,

the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) opened an investigation into the
circumstances surrounding the misstatements in the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements for its 2000 and
2001 ﬁscal years caused by its former controller. In April 2004, the SEC concluded its investigation and issued
a cease and desist order directing the Company to not violate federal securities laws in the future.

Wage-related class action lawsuit:

On April 21, 2004, the Company was served with a complaint alleging certain violations of the California
labor code. Among other charges, the class action complaint alleges that from October 2000 to the present time
certain hourly employees did not take their lunch break within the time period prescribed by state law.
Notwithstanding that the delayed break was at the request of, and for the convenience of, the affected employees,
the Company believes that it could have a liability to pay a wage premium for these delayed lunch breaks. The
Company intends to defend itself vigorously against all allegations in the complaint and has established what
management believes to be an appropriate reserve in the quarter ended February 28, 2004.

Property lease lawsuit and cross-complaint

On May 21, 2004, the Company was served with a lawsuit ﬁled by the owner of a building in Camarillo,
California that was formerly used as the Company’s corporate ofﬁces and principal manufacturing plant under a
15-year lease agreement that expired on February 28, 2004. The lawsuit seeks damages for facility repairs that are
allegedly required in the range of $520,000 to $700,000. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and
intends to defend itself vigorously against all allegations. On May 27, 2004, the Company ﬁled a cross-complaint,
seeking payment by the building owner of approximately $180,000 in deposits and other amounts which the
Company believes it is owed.

NOTE 13 — SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA

Information by business segment is as follows:

Fiscal Year 2004:

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identiﬁable assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SATELLITE

$121,000
15,965

13.2%

WIRELESS
ACCESS

$ 7,616
1,701
22.3%

CORPORATE

TOTAL

—
—
—

$128,616
17,666

13.7%

12,750
80,169

(2,782)
9,208

(4,228)
8,266

5,740
97,642

42

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 13 — SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA (Continued)

Fiscal Year 2003:

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identiﬁable assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Year 2002:

SATELLITE

$88,437
17,251

WIRELESS
ACCESS

$11,607
3,282

19.5%

28.3%

CORPORATE

TOTAL

—
—
—

$100,044
20,533

20.5%

13,217
71,420

(1,226)
10,309

(3,996)
7,868

7,995
89,597

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identiﬁable assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SATELLITE

$78,899
15,469

WIRELESS
ACCESS

$21,816
6,904

19.6%

31.6%

CORPORATE

TOTAL

—
—
—

$100,715
22,373

22.2%

11,490
37,092

89
12,172

(7,398)
7,424

4,181
56,688

Included in cost of sales for Satellite products during the year ended February 28, 2004 were impairment
writedowns of $739,000 on property and equipment which had become underutilized due to increased outsourcing
to contract manufacturers. These impairment writedowns had an adverse impact of 0.6% on Satellite gross margin
in ﬁscal 2004.

The Company considers income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes to be the primary
measure of proﬁt or loss of its business segments. The amount shown for each year in the “Corporate” column
above for income (loss) from continuing operations consists of general and administrative expenses not allocated
to the business segments, and non-operating income/expense. General and administrative expense includes salaries
and wages for the CEO, the CFO, all ﬁnance and accounting personnel, human resource personnel, information
services personnel, and corporate expenses such as audit fees, director and ofﬁcer liability insurance, director fees
and expenses, and costs of producing and distributing the annual report to stockholders. Non-operating income/
expense includes interest income, interest expense, foreign currency gains and losses, and, in ﬁscal year 2002,
litigation settlement expense.

The Company does not have signiﬁcant long-lived assets outside the United States.

Sales information by geographical area for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2004 is

as follows (000s):

United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Latin America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended February 28,

2004

$123,235
1,623
1,877
1,263
227
391
$128,616

2003

$ 90,543
4,088
2,428
2,255
290
440
$100,044

2002

$ 82,936
1,309
1,738
2,258
11,816
658
$100,715

See also “Concentrations of Risk” in Note 1 for sales by major customer.

43

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 14 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On July 31, 2001, the Company sold its 51% ownership interest in Micro Pulse. After giving consideration
to disposition costs and cash of $275,000 which remained with the divested operation, the net cash proceeds of
this transaction amounted to $2,956,000. The sale generated an after-tax gain of $1,615,000.

Micro Pulse was the sole operating unit comprising the Company’s Antenna segment. Accordingly, operating
results for Micro Pulse have been presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the ﬁscal
year ended February 28, 2002 as a discontinued operation, and are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,556

Operating income (loss)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (105)

$ (25)

The net assets of Micro Pulse, and the Company’s basis in its investment in Micro Pulse, consisted of the

following on July 31, 2001, the date of sale (in thousands):

Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, equipment and improvements, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net assets of Micro Pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Minority interest in Micro Pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basis in Micro Pulse investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,845
269
142
(983)
1,273
(566)
$ 707

The gain on sale of the Company’s 51% interest Micro Pulse, shown in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations as “Gain on sale of discontinued operation, net of tax”, is comprised as follows
(in thousands):

Gross sales proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less disposal costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net sales proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Basis in Micro Pulse investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pre-tax gain on sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,408
(177)
3,231
(707)
2,524
(909)
$1,615

NOTE 15 — QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

The following summarizes certain quarterly statement of operations data for each of the quarters in ﬁscal years

2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except percentages and per share data):

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) diluted share . . . . . . . . .

First
Quarter

$18,566
1,306

7.0%
(1,102)
(0.07)

Second
Quarter

$24,197
3,200

13.2%
390
0.03

Fiscal 2004

Third
Quarter

$44,248
6,734

15.2%
3,452
0.22

Fourth
Quarter

$41,605
6,426

15.4%
2,974
0.18

Total

$128,616
17,666

13.7%
5,714
0.37

44

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15 — QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited) (Continued)

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per diluted share . . . . . . . . . . .

NOTE 16 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT

First
Quarter

$22,482
5,844

26.0%
1,466
0.10

Second
Quarter

$27,526
6,355

23.1%
1,818
0.12

Fiscal 2003

Third
Quarter

$23,965
4,378

18.3%
905
0.06

Fourth
Quarter

$26,071
3,956

15.2%
971
0.06

Total

$100,044
20,533

20.5%
5,160
0.35

On April 12, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Vytek Corporation (“Vytek”), a privately-held
company headquartered in San Diego, California engaged in providing hardware and software products and services
that enable both wireless and wireline access to video, voice and data. Vytek has approximately 280 employees
with 10 ofﬁces nationwide. During its eleven month period ended November 30, 2003, Vytek recorded unaudited
revenues of approximately $38.4 million. During this period, Vytek generated approximately 40% of its revenues
from wireless and embedded technology products and 60% of its revenues from software development and
professional services.

In connection with this acquisition, the Company: (i) issued approximately 7,268,800 shares of its common
stock to Vytek’s selling stockholders; (ii) issued and deposited 854,700 shares of its common stock into an escrow
fund; (iii) paid approximately $5,000 in lieu of fractional shares; (iv) converted all Vytek employee stock options
outstanding at the time of the merger into a total of 148,821 fully vested Company stock options that had an
aggregate fair value under the Black-Scholes formula of approximately $1,850,000; and (v) incurred total
transaction costs estimated to be $2,550,000.

The Company entered into an escrow agreement with a designated representative of the selling stockholders
of Vytek and an independent escrow agent. Under the terms of the escrow agreement, the 854,700 shares of the
Company’s common stock deposited into the escrow fund serve as security for potential indemnity claims by the
Company under the acquisition agreement. In addition, in the event Vytek’s balance sheet as of the acquisition date
reﬂects working capital (as deﬁned in the acquisition agreement) of less than $4 million, then the Company can
recover such deﬁciency from the escrow fund (the “Working Capital Adjustment”). Vytek’s stockholder
representative may direct the sale of some or all of the escrow shares for a price of at least $11.00 per share, and
deposit the proceeds received from such sale into the escrow fund. Subject to any claims by the Company for
indemniﬁcation or for the Working Capital Adjustment, except for an amount equal in value to $2 million, all shares
of Company common stock and any cash in the escrow fund will be released to the selling stockholders of Vytek,
in accordance with their pro rata interests, 15 months after the April 12, 2004 closing date. All remaining shares
of Company common stock and any remaining cash in the escrow fund will be released to the Vytek selling
stockholders two years after the closing date, subject to any then pending and unresolved claims for indemniﬁcation
or the Working Capital Adjustment.

The common shares issued to Vytek’s selling stockholders and issued/deposited to the escrow fund were valued
at $11.26 per share, which was the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq National
Market for the period beginning two trading days before and ending two trading days after December 23, 2003,
the day the acquisition terms were agreed to and announced. The aggregate purchase price, including the shares
deposited into the escrow fund, is approximately $96 million.

45

ITEM 9. DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL

DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company’s principal executive ofﬁcer and principal ﬁnancial ofﬁcer have concluded, based on their
evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures (as deﬁned in Regulations 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Report, that the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in reports that are ﬁled
or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal
executive ofﬁcer and principal ﬁnancial ofﬁcer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
speciﬁed in the rules and forms of the Securities Exchange Commission. There have been no signiﬁcant changes
in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors which could signiﬁcantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date that the evaluation was carried out. Additionally, no signiﬁcant deﬁciencies or material weaknesses in
such internal controls requiring corrective actions were identiﬁed.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The directors and executive ofﬁcers of the Company are as follows:

NAME

AGE

POSITION

Ira Coron (1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Richard Gold (1)(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Arthur Hausman (1)(2)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A.J. “Bert” Moyer (2)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

James Ousley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Frank Perna, Jr. (2)(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Thomas Ringer (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fred Sturm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Patrick Hutchins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Tracy Trent

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Richard Vitelle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1) Member of Compensation Committee.
(2) Member of Audit Committee.
(3) Designated as the Audit Committee ﬁnancial expert.
(4) Member of Governance and Nominating Committee

75

49

80

60

58

66

72

46

41

40

50

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director, President and

Chief Executive Ofﬁcer

President, Products Division

President, Solutions Division

Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial

Ofﬁcer and Corporate Secretary

IRA CORON has been Chairman of the Board for California Ampliﬁer, Inc. since March of 1994, and in
addition was the Chief Executive Ofﬁcer until 1997 and remained an ofﬁcer of the Company until February 1999.
From 1989 to 1994 he was an independent management consultant to several companies and venture capital ﬁrms.

46

He retired from TRW, Inc., after serving in numerous senior management positions from June 1967 to July 1989
among which was Vice President and General Manager of TRW’s Electronic Components Group. He also served
as a member of the Executive Committee of the Wireless Communications Association.

RICHARD GOLD has been a director of the Company since December 2000. He is a Venture Director with
InnoCal II, L.P., a venture capital partnership, a position held since May 2004. He served as President and Chief
Executive Ofﬁcer of Nova Crystals, Inc., a supplier of optical sensing equipment, from December 2002 until May
2004. From June 2002 to July 2003, he was Chairman of Radia Communications, Inc., a supplier of wireless
communications semiconductors. From January 1999 to June 2002, he was Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Ofﬁcer of Genoa Corporation, a supplier of optical communications semiconductors. From November
1991 through December 1998, Mr. Gold held various senior-level executive positions with Paciﬁc Monolithics,
Inc., a supplier of wireless communications equipment, including Vice President-Engineering, Chief Operating
Ofﬁcer and, from January 1997 through December 1998, President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer.

ARTHUR HAUSMAN has been a director of the Company since 1987. Mr. Hausman, a private investor,
currently serves as a director of Drexler Technology Corporation, a manufacturer of optical data storage products.
Until his retirement in 1988, he served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Ampex
Corporation, a manufacturer of professional audio-video systems, data/memory products and magnetic tape, where
he was employed for 27 years. Mr. Hausman was appointed by President Reagan to the President’s Export Council,
to the Council’s Executive Committee and to the Chairmanship of the Export Administration Subordinate
Committee of the Council for the period 1985 to 1989.

A.J. “BERT” MOYER has been a director of the Company since February 24, 2004. Mr. Moyer, a business
consultant and private investor, served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of QAD Inc., a
publicly held software company, from March 1998 until February 2000, and he subsequently served as a consultant
to QAD, assisting in the Sales Operations of the Americas Region. From February to July 2000, he served as
president of the commercial division of Proﬁt Recovery Group International, Inc. (now known as PRG-Schultz
International, Inc.), a publicly held provider of recovery audit services. Prior to joining QAD in 1998, Mr. Moyer
served as Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of Allergan Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company based in Irvine, California,
from 1995 to 1998. Mr. Moyer also serves on the board of QAD Inc., a provider of enterprise resource planning
software applications, Collectors Universe, Inc., a company engaged in grading, auctioning and selling high-end
collectibles, and Virco Manufacturing Corporation, which designs and produces furniture for the commercial and
education markets.

JAMES OUSLEY has been a director of the Company since April 20, 2004. Mr. Ousley served as President
and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Vytek Corporation, a wireless integration company, from September 2000 until Vytek
was acquired by the Company effective April 12, 2004. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Ousley was President, Chief
Executive Ofﬁcer and Chairman of Syntegra (USA) Inc. From 1992 to 1999, Mr. Ousley was President and Chief
Executive Ofﬁcer of Control Data Systems. Earlier in his career, Mr. Ousley held executive management positions
with Ceridian, including Executive Vice President of Control Data Corp. (now Ceridian) and President of Ceridian’s
Computer Products business. Mr. Ousley is also a director of ActivCard Corp., an authentication software company;
Bell Microproducts, a value-added distributor of storage products and systems, semiconductors and computer
products and peripherals; Datalink Corporation, a developer of enterprise-class information storage infrastructures;
Norstan, Inc., a communications integration company; and Savvis Communication Corporation, a provider of
Internet protocol (IP) applications and services.

FRANK PERNA, JR. has been a director since May 2000. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Perna was Chief Executive
Ofﬁcer of MagneTek. From 1994 to 1998 Mr. Perna was Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of EOS Corporation,
and from 1998 to the present has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of MSC Software. Mr. Perna
also serves as Chairman of the Board of Software.com and on the Board of Trustees of Kettering University.

THOMAS RINGER has been a director of the Company since August 1996. Since 1990, Mr. Ringer has been
actively involved as a member of the boards of directors for various public and private companies. Mr. Ringer is
currently Chairman of Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc., an investment banking and ﬁnancial services company,
Chairman of Document Sciences Corporation, a publicly held company engaged in developing and marketing
document automation and content management output software, Chairman of M.S. Aerospace, Inc., a privately held

47

manufacturer of aerospace fasteners, Chairman of the Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, an executive
education services company, and a member of the Board of Directors of Maxwell Technologies, Inc., a leading
ultracapacitor company. Prior to 1990, Mr. Ringer served as President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Recognition
Equipment Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed company, President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Fujitsu
Systems of America, Inc. and President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Computer Machinery Corporation.

FRED STURM was appointed Chief Executive Ofﬁcer, President and Director in August 1997. Prior to joining
the Company from 1990 to 1997, Mr. Sturm was President of Chloride Power Systems (USA), and Managing
Director of Chloride Safety, Security, and Power Conversion (UK), both of which are part of Chloride Group, PLC
(LSE: CHLD). From 1979 to 1990, he held a variety of general management positions with M/A-Com and TRW
Electronics, which served RF and microwave markets.

PATRICK HUTCHINS joined the Company as Vice President, Operations in August 2001, and was appointed
President of the Company’s Products Division effective April 12, 2004. From March 1997 until joining the
Company, Mr. Hutchins served in general management capacities with several units of Chloride Group PLC and
Genlyte Thomas LLC, most recently serving as the President and General Manager of Chloride Systems, a division
of Genlyte Thomas.

TRACY TRENT joined the Company as President of the Solutions Division effective April 12, 2004. From
April 3, 2003 until April 12, 2004, Mr. Trent served as Chief Operating Ofﬁcer of Vytek Corporation. Prior to his
role as COO of Vytek, Mr. Trent served as Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Stellcom, Inc., a company engaged in the
development and deployment of mobile computing technologies, services and solutions for enterprises and
technology providers. Stellcom was acquired by Vytek in April 2003. Mr. Trent also served in senior executive roles
from 1993 to 2000 at SAIC where he established and managed several technology divisions including the
Automotive Network Exchange (ANX) and the Health Solutions organization. Before joining SAIC, Mr. Trent held
business development roles at Digital Equipment Corporation and Sun Microsystems.

RICHARD VITELLE joined the Company as Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Ofﬁcer and Corporate
Secretary in July 2001. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Vice President of Finance and CFO of SMTEK
International, Inc., a publicly held electronics manufacturing services provider, where he was employed for a total
of 11 years. Earlier in his career Mr. Vitelle served as a senior manager with Price Waterhouse.

Ofﬁcers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Board Committees

The Company has a Compensation Committee that reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of
Directors with respect to the compensation of the Company’s executive ofﬁcers as well as administers the
Company’s Stock Option Plans.

The Company has an Audit Committee that reviews the scope of audit procedures employed by the Company’s
independent auditors, approves the audit fee charged by the independent auditors, reviews the audit reports rendered
by the Company’s independent auditors, and pre-approves all non-audit services to be performed by the independent
auditors. The Audit Committee reports to the Board of Directors with respect to such matters and recommends the
selection of independent auditors.

The Company has a Governance and Nominating Committee that reviews and makes recommendations on
the composition of the Board and its committees, evaluates and recommends candidates for election to the Board,
and reviews and makes recommendations to the full Board on corporate governance matters.

Code of Ethics

During ﬁscal 2004 the Company adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”)
that applies to all of the Company’s directors, ofﬁcers and employees. Section 14 of this Code of Ethics contains
a Financial Management Code of Ethics that applies speciﬁcally to the Company’s Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and
all ﬁnance and accounting employees including the Company’s senior ﬁnancial ofﬁcers, in accordance with Section
406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated

48

thereunder. The Code of Ethics is expected to be made available on the Company’s corporate website at
www.calamp.com in the near future. Until such time, a copy of the Code of Ethics may be obtained without charge
upon request to the Corporate Secretary of California Ampliﬁer, 1401 N. Rice Avenue, Oxnard, California 93030.
In the event that the Company makes changes in, or provides waivers from, the provisions of this Code of Ethics
that are required to be disclosed by SEC regulations, the Company intends to disclose these events on its
corporate website.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the Company’s deﬁnitive proxy statement
for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 30, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference and made
a part hereof.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information under the caption “Stock Ownership” in the Company’s deﬁnitive proxy statement for
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 30, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference and made a
part hereof.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information contained under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the
Company’s deﬁnitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 30, 2004 is
incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information contained under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the Company’s
deﬁnitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 30, 2004 is incorporated herein
by reference and made a part hereof.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

PART IV

(a) List of Financial Statements

The following ﬁnancial statements are ﬁled as part of this Report:

1. Financial Statements

Form 10-K
Page No.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Financial Statements Schedules:

Financial statement schedules are either not applicable, not required or the information
required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
Notes thereto included in this report.

49

3. Exhibits

Exhibits required to be ﬁled as part of this report are:

Exhibit
Number

2.1

2.2

3.1

3.1.1

3.2

3.2.1

4.1

10.1

10.1.1

10.1.2

10.1.3

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

Description

Asset Purchase Agreement dated April 5, 2002 between and among the Company, Kaul-Tronics,
Inc., NGP, Inc., and Interactive Technologies International, LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2002).

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated December 23, 2003 between the
Company and Vytek Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s
Registration Statement No. 333-112851 on Form S-4).

Certiﬁcate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-59702 on Form S-1).

Amendment to Certiﬁcate of Incorporation of the Company, as ﬁled with the Delaware Secretary
of State on September 19, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 of the Company’s
Interim Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 1996).

Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 1992).

Amendment to Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2004).

Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, amended and restated as of September 5, 2001, by
and between California Ampliﬁer, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K ﬁled on September 6, 2001).

1989 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the
Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-31427 on Form S-8).

Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.7 of the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-36944 on Form S-8).

Amendment No. 2 to the 1989 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.8 of the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-72704 on Form S-8).

Amendment No. 3 to the 1989 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.10 of the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-60879 on Form S-8).

The 1999 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s
Registration Statement No. 333-93097 on Form S-8).

Building lease dated June 10, 2003 between the Company and Sunbelt Enterprises for a facility
in Oxnard, California (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-1 ﬁled with the Company’s Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2003).

Form of Indemnity Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit ﬁled with Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 1988).

Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association
dated May 2, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2002).

10.5.1

Amendment No. 1 dated April 3, 2003 to the Loan and Security Agreement between the Company
and U.S. Bank National Association dated May 2, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-2
ﬁled with the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2003).

50

Exhibit
Number

10.5.2

10.5.3

10.5.4

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

21

23

31.1

31.2

32

Description

Amendment No. 2 dated July 3, 2003 to the Loan and Security Agreement between the Company
and U.S. Bank National Association dated May 2, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-2
ﬁled with the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2003).

Amendment No. 3 dated January 5, 2004 to the Loan and Security Agreement between the
Company and U.S. Bank National Association dated May 2, 2002 (ﬁled herewith).

Amendment No. 4 dated February 27, 2004 to the Loan and Security Agreement between the
Company and U.S. Bank National Association dated May 2, 2002 (ﬁled herewith).

Employment Agreement between the Company and Patrick Hutchins dated May 31, 2002 (ﬁled
herewith).

Employment Agreement between the Company and Fred Sturm dated May 31, 2002 (ﬁled
herewith).

Employment Agreement between the Company and Tracy Trent dated February 2, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Registration Statement No.
333-112851 on Form S-4).

Employment Agreement between the Company and Richard Vitelle dated May 31, 2002 (ﬁled
herewith).

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Certiﬁcation of Chief Executive Ofﬁcer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certiﬁcation of Chief Financial Ofﬁcer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certiﬁcation of Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.

During the three months ended February 28, 2004 the Company ﬁled the following reports on Form 8-K:

1. On December 23, 2003, the Company ﬁled a report on Form 8-K that (i) furnished a copy of its press
release announcing the ﬁnancial results for the Company’s third quarter ended November 30, 2003, and
(ii) ﬁled its press release announcing the signing on December 23, 2003 of a deﬁnitive agreement to
acquired Vytek Corporation.

2. On January 5, 2004, the Company ﬁled a report on Form 8-K that set forth as an exhibit the deﬁnitive
agreement entered into on December 23, 2003 to acquire Vytek Corporation, subject to stockholder
approvals.

3. On February 25, 2004, the Company ﬁled a report on Form 8-K with a press release announcing the

appointment of A.J. Moyer to the Company’s Board of Directors.

4. On February 27, 2004, the Company ﬁled a report on Form 8-K with a press release announcing the date
of a special stockholders meeting for the purpose of approving the Company’s acquisition of Vytek
Corporation.

51

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on May 27, 2004.

SIGNATURES

CALIFORNIA AMPLIFIER, INC.

By: /s/ Fred M. Sturm

Fred M. Sturm
Chief Executive Ofﬁcer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by

the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

/s/ Ira Coron
Ira Coron

/s/ Richard Gold
Richard Gold

/s/ Arthur Hausman
Arthur Hausman

/s/ A.J. Moyer
A.J. Moyer

/s/ James Ousley
James Ousley

/s/ Frank Perna, Jr.
Frank Perna, Jr.

/s/ Thomas Ringer
Thomas Ringer

/s/ Fred M. Sturm
Fred M. Sturm

/s/ Richard Vitelle
Richard Vitelle

Title

Date

Chairman of the Board of Directors

May 27, 2004

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

President, Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and
Director (principal executive ofﬁcer)

May 27, 2004

May 27, 2004

May 27, 2004

May 27, 2004

May 27, 2004

May 27, 2004

May 27, 2004

VP Finance, Chief Financial Ofﬁcer and
Treasurer (principal accounting ofﬁcer)

May 27, 2004

52