UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-31615
DURECT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
94-3297098
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
10240 Bubb Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 777-1417
Title of Each Class
Common Stock $0.0001 par value per share
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Trading Symbol(s)
DRRX
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The NASDAQ Capital Market LLC
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ☐ NO ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 of the Act. YES ☐ NO ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period than the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Emerging growth company
☐
☒
☐
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
☐
☒
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously
issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ☐ NO ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $120,215,631 as of June 30, 2023 based upon the closing sale price on The Nasdaq Capital Market
reported for such date. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director and by each person who may be deemed to be an affiliate have been excluded. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily
a conclusive determination for other purposes.
There were 31,035,981 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock issued and outstanding as of March 26, 2024.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
DURECT CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1.
Business
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
ITEM 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
ITEM 1C
Cybersecurity
ITEM 2.
Properties
ITEM 3.
Legal Proceedings
ITEM 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
ITEM 5.
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
PART II
Equity Securities
ITEM 6.
[Reserved]
ITEM 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
ITEM 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
ITEM 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 9A.
Controls and Procedures
ITEM 9B.
Other Information
ITEM 9C.
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevent Inspections
ITEM 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
ITEM 11.
Executive Compensation
PART III
ITEM 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
ITEM 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
ITEM 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
ITEM 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
PART IV
Exhibit Index
ITEM 16.
Form 10-K Summary
Signatures
Page
1
29
64
64
66
66
66
67
67
68
83
84
119
119
120
120
121
126
141
144
145
146
147
151
152
Item 1. Business.
Overview
Part I
We are a biopharmaceutical company advancing novel and potentially lifesaving investigational therapies derived from our
Epigenetic Regulator Program. Larsucosterol, a new chemical entity in clinical development, is the lead candidate in our
Epigenetic Regulator Program. An endogenous, orally bioavailable small molecule, larsucosterol has been shown in both in vitro
and in vivo studies to play an important regulatory role in lipid metabolism, stress and inflammatory responses, and cell death
and survival. We are developing larsucosterol for alcohol-associated hepatitis (“AH”), a life-threatening acute liver condition with
no approved therapeutics and a 28-Day and 90-Day historical mortality rate of 20%-26% and 29%-31%, respectively. After
completing a Phase 2a trial in which 100% of AH patients treated with larsucosterol survived the 28-Day study period, we
conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b clinical trial called AHFIRM (trial in AH to evaluate saFety and effIcacy of
laRsucosterol treatMent). Through our AHFIRM trial, we evaluated larsucosterol’s potential to reduce mortality or liver
transplantation compared to a placebo with or without steroids at the investigators’ discretion. In total, we enrolled 307 patients
at leading hospitals in the U.S., Australia, E.U. and U.K. In November 2023, we announced topline data from the AHFIRM trial that
showed a compelling efficacy signal in favor of larsucosterol in the key secondary endpoint of mortality at 90 days. Both the 30
mg and 90 mg larsucosterol doses demonstrated clinically meaningful trends in reduction of mortality at 90 days with mortality
reductions of 41% (p=0.068) in the 30 mg arm and 35% (p=0.124) in the 90 mg arm compared with placebo. The numerical
improvement in the primary endpoint of mortality or liver transplant at 90 days did not achieve statistical significance for either
dose of larsucosterol. Both doses of larsucosterol in AHFIRM showed a more pronounced reduction in mortality in patients
enrolled in the U.S., representing 76% of patients enrolled in the trial. The reductions in mortality at 90 days were 57%
(p=0.014) in the 30 mg arm and 58% (p=0.008) in the 90 mg arm compared with placebo in the U.S. Larsucosterol was safe and
well tolerated. There were fewer treatment-emergent adverse events ("TEAEs") in the larsucosterol arms compared with
placebo. We are in ongoing communications with the FDA regarding next steps for the development of larsucosterol, including
the trial design for a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial in AH. We have also investigated larsucosterol in patients with metabolic
dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (“MASH”), also known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or NASH with encouraging results in
a Phase 1b clinical trial and may consider further development of larsucosterol for this and other indications.
In addition to our Epigenetic Regulator Program, we developed a novel and proprietary post-surgical pain product called
POSIMIR® that utilizes our innovative SABER® platform technology to enable continuous sustained delivery of bupivacaine, a non-
opioid local analgesic, over three days in adults. In February 2021, POSIMIR received FDA approval for post-surgical pain
reduction for up to 72 hours following arthroscopic subacromial decompression. In December 2021, we entered into a license
agreement (the “Innocoll Agreement”) with Innocoll Pharmaceuticals Limited (“Innocoll”), pursuant to which the Company
granted to Innocoll an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop, manufacture and commercialize
POSIMIR in the United States. In September 2022, Innocoll launched POSIMIR in the U.S.
NOTE: POSIMIR® is a trademark of Innocoll Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. in the U.S. and a trademark of DURECT Corporation
outside of the U.S. SABER®, ORADUR™ and ALZET® are trademarks of DURECT Corporation. Other trademarks referred to belong
to their respective owners. Full prescribing information for POSIMIR, including BOXED WARNING and Medication Guide can be
found at www.posimir.com. Full prescribing information for PERSERIS, including BOXED WARNING and Medication Guide can be
found at www.perseris.com.
1
As a result of the assignment of certain patent rights, we also receive single digit sales-based earn-out payments from U.S.
net sales of Indivior UK Limited (“Indivior”)’s PERSERIS® (risperidone) drug for schizophrenia and single-digit royalties from net
sales of Orient Pharma Co., Ltd. (“Orient Pharma”)’s Methydur Sustained Release Capsules (“Methydur”) for the treatment of
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) in Taiwan. We also manufacture and sell ALZET® miniature osmotic pumps used
in laboratory research.
Epigenetic Regulator Program and New Chemical Entities
Epigenetic regulation influences the expression of genes through the silencing or initiation of gene activity without
modifying the DNA sequence. For instance, methylation (the chemical binding of a methyl group) of cytosine nucleotides in
promoter regions of DNA, facilitated by DNA methyltransferases (“DNMTs”), will generally result in downregulation of gene
expression, while demethylation (removal of a methyl group) generally results in upregulation. DNA methylation/demethylation
can thus regulate the expression of relevant genes, especially clusters of master genes that further modulate crucial cellular
activities.
Our Epigenetic Regulator Program involved a multi-year collaborative effort with the Department of Internal Medicine at
Virginia Commonwealth University (“VCU”), the VCU Medical Center and the McGuire VA Medical Center. The knowledge base
supporting this program is a result of more than 30 years of lipid research by Shunlin Ren, M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Internal
Medicine at the VCU Medical Center. The lead compound from this program, larsucosterol, is an endogenous sulfated oxysterol,
which acts as an epigenetic regulator. Under a license with VCU, we hold the exclusive royalty-bearing worldwide right to develop
and commercialize larsucosterol and related molecules discovered in the program.
In March 2021, a peer-reviewed research paper regarding the proposed mechanism of action of larsucosterol was published
in The Journal of Lipid Research. The research showed that larsucosterol (referred to in the paper as “25HC3S”) bound to and
inhibited the activities of DNMTs 1, 3a and 3b, enzymes that add methyl groups to DNA (a process called “DNA methylation”), as
well as reduced DNA hypermethylation. DNMTs 1 and 3a have been shown to be over-expressed in the livers of patients with
severe AH. As such, by inhibiting DNMTs 1 and 3a activity, larsucosterol may inhibit DNA hypermethylation, thereby modulating
the expression of genes and pathways that are involved in crucial cellular activities, including those associated with cell death,
stress response, and lipid biosynthesis. These modulations may lead to improved cell survival, reduced lipid accumulation or
lipotoxicity, minimized inflammation, and enhanced liver regeneration, as has been observed in various in vivo animal models
and in results from our completed clinical trials in AH and MASH patients.
The biological activity of larsucosterol has been demonstrated in over a dozen different animal disease models involving
three animal species. Some of these models represent acute organ injuries (e.g., LPS-induced endotoxin shock, drug-induced
acute oxidative stress injury, ischemic-reperfusion-induced kidney and brain injury), and some represent chronic metabolic
disorders (e.g., MASH).
2
Our major product research and development efforts for larsucosterol are described in the following table:
Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis Program with Injectable Larsucosterol
In pharmacokinetic (“PK”) and toxicology studies conducted in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, minipigs and monkeys,
larsucosterol has been found to be well tolerated and safe by all routes of administration tested to date. These results support the
use of larsucosterol in completed and ongoing human safety, PK, proof-of-concept, and efficacy trials. The chronic toxicity of
larsucosterol was further assessed in a 6-month oral study in rats and in a 9-month oral study in dogs. These studies support the
use of larsucosterol in long duration human trials.
Market Opportunity. AH, an acute form of alcohol-associated liver disease, is associated with long-term heavy intake of
alcohol and often occurs after a recent period of increased alcohol consumption. AH is typically characterized by recent onset
jaundice and hepatic failure. A Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (“MELD”) score is a commonly used scoring system to assess
the severity and prognosis of AH patients. AH was associated with approximately 158,000 U.S. hospitalizations in 2020 according
to the available data published for that year. A retrospective analysis of 77 studies published between 1971 and 2016, which
included data from a total of 8,184 patients, showed the overall mortality from AH was 26% at 28 days, 29% at 90 days and 44%
at 180 days. A subsequent global study published in December 2021, which included 85 tertiary centers in 11 countries across 3
continents, prospectively enrolled 2,581 AH patients with a median MELD score of 23.5, reported mortality at 28 and 90 days of
approximately 20% and 31%, respectively.
There are no FDA approved therapies for AH and stopping alcohol consumption is necessary, but frequently not sufficient
for recovery in many moderate and severe patients. Corticosteroids do not improve survival at 90 days or one year, and have
demonstrated an increased risk of infection. In addition,
3
fewer than 50% of AH patients are eligible for corticosteroids. According to a recent study, the healthcare costs associated with
treating hospitalized AH patients and their length of hospital stay are significant.
Each hospitalization episode with AH
diagnosis for patients who:
Died during the hospitalization
Were discharged
Average length of stay
9 days
6 days
Average total charges during hospital
stay
$147,000
$53,000
Marlowe, N., Lam, D., Krebs, W., Lin, W. & Liangpunsakul, S. (2022) Prevalence, co-morbidities, and in-hospital mortality of
patients hospitalized with alcohol-associated hepatitis in the United States from 2015 to 2019. Alcoholism: Clinical and
Experimental Research.
The rate of AH patients undergoing liver transplantation has increased in recent years, although the total number of such
transplants is still relatively small and limited by organ availability. Average charges for a liver transplant exceed $875,000, and
patients require lifelong immunosuppressive therapy to prevent organ rejection.
Clinical Program.
Phase 2b AHFIRM Study
In January 2021, we announced the dosing of the first patient in our Phase 2b AHFIRM study of patients with severe AH.
AHFIRM was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multi-center Phase 2b study to evaluate the safety and
efficacy of larsucosterol in 307 patients with severe AH. The study was comprised of three arms targeting approximately 100
patients each: (1) placebo; (2) larsucosterol (30 mg); and (3) larsucosterol (90 mg). All patients received supportive care at the
investigators’ discretion, which for placebo patients may include 32 mg methylprednisolone if prescribed. In order to maintain
blinding, patients in the two active arms received matching placebo capsules if the investigator prescribed steroids. Patients
received an IV dose of larsucosterol or placebo (sterile water) on Day 1 and a second identical IV dose on Day 4 if they were still
hospitalized. The primary outcome measure was the 90-Day incidence of mortality or liver transplantation for patients treated
with larsucosterol compared to those treated with placebo. Secondary endpoints included the difference in 90-Day mortality
between patients treated with larsucosterol compared to those treated with placebo, the difference in 28-Day mortality or liver
transplantation for patients treated with larsucosterol compared to those treated with placebo, and the difference in mortality
between patients treated with larsucosterol compared to those treated with placebo. In November 2023, we announced topline
results from the AHFIRM trial, comprising 307 patients with severe AH.
Key AHFIRM Trial Topline Data Results:
•
•
•
Both the 30 mg and 90 mg larsucosterol doses demonstrated clinically meaningful trends in reduction of mortality at 90
days, the key secondary endpoint, with mortality reductions of 41% (p=0.068) in the 30 mg arm and 35% (p=0.124) in
the 90 mg arm compared with placebo.
The numerical improvement in the primary endpoint of mortality or liver transplant at 90 days did not achieve statistical
significance for either dose of larsucosterol.
Both doses of larsucosterol showed a more pronounced reduction in mortality in patients enrolled in the U.S.,
representing 76% of patients enrolled in the trial. The reductions in mortality at 90 days were 57% (p=0.014) for the 30
mg arm and 58% (p=0.008) for the 90 mg arm compared with placebo in the U.S.
•
Larsucosterol was safe and well tolerated. There were fewer TEAEs in the larsucosterol arms compared with placebo.
4
Mortality or Liver Transplantation at 90 Days
The primary endpoint for the AHFIRM trial was the reduction in mortality or liver transplantation at 90 days. The endpoint
was analyzed using a hierarchical assessment of patient outcomes to calculate a win probability for each of the 30 mg and 90 mg
dose of larsucosterol compared with placebo. The results for the primary endpoint were not statistically significant for either the
30 mg or 90 mg doses compared with placebo, though a numerical improvement was observed.
Patient Outcomes
Number of patients randomized
Number of patients with 90-day outcome data
Deaths (%)
Transplants (%)
Alive & Transplant-free (%)
Placebo*
103
102
25 (24.5%)
4 (3.9%)
73 (71.6%)
Larsucosterol
30 mg
102
99
15 (15.2%)
6 (6.1%)
78 (78.8%)
Larsucosterol
90 mg
102
101
17 (16.8%)
9 (8.9%)
75 (74.3%)
* One subject in the placebo group was confirmed alive at Day 90 but transplant status unknown. One patient received a liver
transplant and subsequently died.
Win Probability Analysis
Win Probability % at 90 days
p-value
1
Larsucosterol 30 mg vs. Placebo
Larsucosterol 90 mg vs. Placebo
Placebo
15.8%
30 mg
23.6%
0.196
Placebo
19.2%
90 mg
23.1%
0.533
1 Win probability was calculated based on the hierarchy of alive and transplant-free being superior to transplant and death and
transplant being superior to death. Comparisons of the same outcome were included in the denominator as ties.
Mortality at 90 Days
Mortality at 90 days was a key secondary endpoint for the AHFIRM trial. In this analysis, the 30 mg and 90 mg doses of
larsucosterol showed numerical trends toward a clinically meaningful survival benefit with 90-day mortality reductions of
approximately 41% and 35%, respectively, when compared to placebo, although these results were not statistically significant.
Group
Larsucosterol 30 mg (n=102)
Placebo (n=103)
Larsucosterol 90 mg (n=102)
Placebo (n=103)
Mortality at 90 Days
15.3%
25.8%
16.2%
24.9%
% Reduction vs. Placebo
-40.7%
Difference vs. Placebo
-10.5%
p-value
0.068
-34.9%
-8.7%
0.124
5
Mortality at 90 Days (U.S. patients)
When further analyzed by geography, both the 30 mg and 90 mg doses showed an enhanced survival benefit at 90 days
with reductions in 90-day mortality of 57% and 58%, respectively, in patients enrolled in the U.S., which represented 76% of the
total patients enrolled.
Group
Larsucosterol 30 mg (n=76)
Placebo (n=78)
Larsucosterol 90 mg (n=78)
Placebo (n=78)
Safety and Tolerability
Mortality at 90 Days
12.3%
28.5%
11.7%
27.9%
% Reduction vs. Placebo
-56.8%
Difference vs. Placebo
-16.1%
p-value
0.014
-58.1%
-16.2%
0.008
Both the 30 mg and 90 mg doses of larsucosterol were well tolerated. There were fewer TEAEs in the larsucosterol arms
compared with placebo.
Number of TEAEs
Phase 2a clinical trial
Placebo
721
Larsucosterol
30 mg
545
Larsucosterol
90 mg
567
In 2019, we completed a Phase 2a clinical trial evaluating safety and PK of intravenously (“IV”) infused larsucosterol in
patients with moderate and severe AH. Severity of AH was determined by MELD scores with moderate defined as MELD 11-20
and severe as MELD 21-30. This was an open label, dose escalation (30 mg, 90 mg and 150 mg), multi-center U.S. study,
designed to be conducted in two sequential parts. Part A included patients with moderate AH and Part B included patients with
severe AH.
In this Phase 2a trial, dose escalation was permitted following review of safety and PK results of the prior dose level by a
Dose Escalation Committee. The target number of patients for the study was 4 per dose group. Final enrollment included 19
patients with moderate (7 of 19) and severe AH (12 of 19), who received IV larsucosterol at 30 mg, 90 mg, or 150 mg doses.
Eight patients (four moderate and four severe) were dosed at 30 mg, seven patients (three moderate and four severe) were
dosed at 90 mg and four patients (all severe) were dosed at 150 mg. After being discharged on Day 2, one patient did not return
for the scheduled Day 7 and Day 28 follow-up visits; therefore Lille, bilirubin and MELD data reported below are based on 18
patients. The objectives of this study included assessment of safety, PK and pharmacodynamic signals, including liver
biochemistry, biomarkers and prognostic scores, including the Lille score, following larsucosterol treatment.
In November 2019, the results from this Phase 2a clinical trial of larsucosterol in AH were presented as a late-breaking oral
presentation at The Liver Meeting®. The study summary results were also selected for inclusion in the ‘Best of The Liver Meeting’
presentation in the alcohol-related liver disease category.
6
All 19 patients treated with larsucosterol in this trial survived the 28-day follow-up period and there were no drug-related
serious adverse events. Using an alternative measure of AH severity to MELD, Maddrey’s Discrimination Function (“DF”), 15 of
the 19 patients had DF scores of 32 or greater, indicating that they had severe AH. Patients treated with larsucosterol had a
statistically significant reduction from baseline in bilirubin at Day 7 and Day 28, and MELD at Day 28. Lille scores, which are used
in clinical practice to help determine the prognosis and response of AH patients after 7 days of treatment, were also statistically
significantly lower than those from a well-matched group of patients in a contemporary trial as well as several published historical
controls. 74% of all larsucosterol treated patients and 67% of those with severe AH were discharged from the hospital within 4
days after receiving a single dose of larsucosterol.
In the Phase 2a study of larsucosterol in AH, larsucosterol was well tolerated at all doses tested. There were no drug-
related serious adverse events and only three adverse events designated as possibly or probably related to larsucosterol: one
occurrence of moderate generalized pruritus, one mild rash and one grade two alkaline phosphatase elevation. There were no
discontinuations, early withdrawals or termination of study drug or study participation due to adverse events. All patients treated
with larsucosterol survived through the 28-Day follow-up period. Drug exposures were dose proportional and were not affected by
the severity of the disease.
Fast Track Designation
In December 2020, we announced that the FDA had granted larsucosterol Fast Track Designation for the treatment of AH.
The FDA grants Fast Track Designation to facilitate development and expedite the review of therapies with the potential to treat a
serious condition where there is an unmet medical need. A therapeutic that receives Fast Track Designation may benefit from
early and frequent communication with the agency in addition to a rolling submission of the marketing application, with the
objective of getting important new therapies to patients more quickly.
Chronic Liver Disease Program with Orally Administered Larsucosterol
Market Opportunity. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (“MASLD”) is the most common form of
chronic liver disease in both children and adults. It is estimated that MASLD, also known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
(NAFLD), affects approximately 35% to 50% of adults and 5-10% of children in North America. Metabolic dysfunction-associated
steatohepatitis (“MASH”), also known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or NASH, a more severe and progressive form of MASLD, is
one of the most common chronic liver diseases worldwide, with an estimated prevalence of 3-5% globally. In addition to these
liver diseases, there are a number of orphan liver diseases for which we may seek to develop larsucosterol.
Clinical Program. In 2020, we completed a Phase 1b randomized, multi-center, and open-label clinical study in the United
States to evaluate safety, PK and signals of biological activity of larsucosterol in MASH patients with stage 1-3 fibrosis.
Larsucosterol (at doses of 50 mg QD, 150 mg QD and 300 mg BID) was administered orally for 28 days with 20 patients or more
per dose group for a total of 65 patients in the trial. Key endpoints included safety and PK, and clinical chemistry/efficacy signals,
such as liver enzymes (e.g., ALT, AST and GGT (each as defined below)), serum lipids (e.g., triglycerides), biomarkers (e.g., CK-
18s, inflammatory cytokines), and insulin resistance (i.e., HOMA-IR), as well as liver fat content and liver stiffness by imaging
(e.g., MRI-PDFF (as defined below) and FibroScan®).
Both the 50 mg and 600 mg dose groups showed a statistically significant median reduction at Day 28 from baseline of
serum alanine aminotransferase (“ALT”) levels at -16% and -17%, respectively. The 600 mg dose group also showed statistically
significant median reductions at Day 28 from baseline of serum aspartate aminotransferase (“AST”) (-18%) and gamma-glutamyl
transferase (“GGT”) (-8%), and the 50 mg dose group had a statistically significant reduction at Day 28 from baseline in liver
stiffness as measured by Fibroscan® (-10%).
7
Patients in the 50 mg or 150 mg dose groups also had statistically significant median reduction at Day 28 from baseline of
serum triglycerides (-13% in the 50 mg group) or LDL-C (-11% in the 150 mg group). Patients with elevated baseline triglycerides
(≥200 mg/dL; n=16) across all dose groups had a median reduction at Day 28 from baseline of -24% (p <0.01). Furthermore,
patients in the 50 mg and 150 mg groups had 22% and 18%, respectively, median reductions (not statistically significant) of
HOMA-IR from baseline respectively after 4 weeks of daily oral dosing of larsucosterol. The 600 mg group did not show a change
in HOMA-IR.
At Day 28, 43% of patients in all three dose groups showed greater than or equal to 10% liver fat reduction from baseline
as measured by magnetic resonance imaging - proton density fat fraction ("MRI-PDFF"). In this subgroup, there was a significant
reduction from baseline in median liver fat content (-18%, -19%, and -23%, in the 50 mg, 150 mg and 600 mg groups,
respectively). The reduction of liver fat content was accompanied by a significant median reduction from baseline of serum ALT
(-21%, -19%, and -32%, in the 50 mg, 150 mg and 600 mg groups, respectively), as well as both CK-18, M30 and M65 (each as
defined below) in the 50 mg and 600 mg groups.
Larsucosterol was well tolerated at all three doses evaluated. There were no serious adverse events reported during the
study, and no discontinuations, early withdrawals or termination of study drug or study participation due to adverse events. PK
parameters after repeat dosing were comparable to those after a single dose (from a prior study), indicating no accumulation of
the drug after repeat dosing.
We have completed multiple Phase 1 trials in healthy subjects with orally administered larsucosterol. These include single-
ascending-dose and multiple-ascending-dose studies as well as a food effect study. In all these studies larsucosterol was well-
tolerated at all dose levels, with no serious treatment-related adverse events reported. Dose-related increases in plasma
concentrations were observed and no accumulation in plasma concentrations or food effects were observed with repeat dosing.
We also conducted a Phase 1b trial in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic MASH patients and MCS (matched by age, body mass
index and gender with normal liver function) utilizing orally administered larsucosterol. This was an open-label, single-ascending-
dose safety and PK study conducted in Australia in two successive dose cohorts (first a low dose of 50 mg and then a high dose of
200 mg). Both cohorts consisted of 10 MASH patients and 6 MCS. Data from this study were presented at the International Liver
Congress™ 2017 organized by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) in Amsterdam in April 2017. All patients
and MCS in this study tolerated larsucosterol well. One patient (with a prior history of arrhythmia and an ongoing viral infection)
in the high dose cohort experienced a serious adverse event (i.e., shortness of breath), which occurred without unusual
biochemical changes and resolved without intervention but was considered possibly treatment related by the physician due to its
temporal association with dosing. In both low and high dose cohorts, the PK parameters were comparable between the MASH
patients and the MCS. In addition, the systemic exposure following the low and high doses of larsucosterol was dose dependent.
8
While this study was not designed to assess efficacy, we observed statistically significant reductions from baseline levels of
several biomarkers after both doses of larsucosterol. A single oral dose of larsucosterol significantly reduced the levels of both
full-length (“M65”) and cleaved (“M30”) cytokeratin-18 (“CK-18”), bilirubin, hsCRP, and IL-18 in these subjects. The mean
reduction of full-length CK-18 (a generalized cell death marker) at the measured time point of greatest effect (12 hours after
dosing) was 33% in the low dose cohort and 41% in the high dose cohort. The mean decrease of cleaved CK-18 (a cell apoptosis
marker) at the measured time point of greatest effect (12 hours after dosing) was 37% in the low dose cohort and 47% in the
high dose cohort. The mean reduction of total bilirubin (a liver function marker) at the measured time point of greatest effect (12
hours after dosing) was 27% in the low dose cohort and 31% in the high dose cohort. The mean decrease of hsCRP (a marker of
inflammation) at the measured time point of greatest effect (24 hours after dosing) was 8% in the low dose cohort and 13% in the
high dose cohort. The mean decrease of IL-18 (an inflammatory mediator) at the measured time point of greatest effect (8 hours
after dosing) was 4% in the low dose cohort and 8% in the high dose cohort.
We also conducted a Phase 1b open-label, multi-center U.S. study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK of
larsucosterol in subjects with moderate (Child-Pugh B scores, n=10) and severe (Child-Pugh C scores, n=7) hepatic function
impairment ("HI"), and MCS (n=10) with normal hepatic function. Each subject received a single oral dose of 200 mg
larsucosterol. Results from this study were presented at the International Liver Conference 2021 (EASL). Larsucosterol was safe
and well-tolerated by all moderate and severe HI subjects with no adverse events and no dose-limiting toxicity reported
throughout the study. As expected, clearance of larsucosterol was decreased in HI subjects compared to MCS with normal hepatic
function, resulting in a 4-10-fold higher drug exposure (Cmax and AUC) in HI subjects. Additionally, a single oral dose of 200 mg
of larsucosterol in subjects with HI resulted in statistically significant median reductions from baseline of the apoptosis biomarker
M30 (cCK-18) at 12 hours post-dose.
Collectively, the biological signals observed in MASH and HI patients plus results from our animal models and cell culture
studies suggest potential therapeutic activity of larsucosterol for patients with liver diseases. However, additional studies are
required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of larsucosterol, and there is no assurance that these biomarker, clinical chemistry
and liver imaging effects will be associated with clinically relevant benefits, or that larsucosterol will demonstrate safety or
efficacy in treating liver diseases in our ongoing or future trials.
9
Approved and Commercial Pharmaceutical Products
POSIMIR® (bupivacaine solution)
POSIMIR (bupivacaine solution) for infiltration use is a novel and proprietary product that combines the strength of 660 mg
of bupivacaine base with the innovative SABER platform technology, enabling continuous sustained delivery of a non-opioid local
analgesic over three days in adults, which we believe coincides with the time period of the greatest need for post-surgical pain
control in most patients. POSIMIR contains more bupivacaine than any other approved single-dose sustained-release bupivacaine
product. At the end of surgery, POSIMIR is administered into the subacromial space under direct arthroscopic visualization,
where it continuously releases bupivacaine for 72 hours or more.
In February 2021, the FDA approved POSIMIR for infiltration use in adults for administration into the subacromial space
under direct arthroscopic visualization to produce post-surgical analgesia for up to 72 hours following arthroscopic subacromial
decompression.
In December 2021, we entered into the Innocoll Agreement, pursuant to which we granted to Innocoll an exclusive, royalty-
bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop, manufacture and commercialize POSIMIR in the U.S. with respect to all uses
and applications in humans. The Innocoll Agreement provides for the assignment of our supply agreement with a contract
manufacturing organization to Innocoll and also provides Innocoll with the right, within the U.S., to expand the approved
indications of POSIMIR. We retain, outside the U.S., all of the global rights to POSIMIR. Innocoll paid us an initial non-refundable,
upfront fee of $4.0 million as well as a fee in the amount of $1.3 million primarily to cover the manufacturing supplies and
excipients and certain equipment transferred to Innocoll pursuant to the terms of the Innocoll Agreement, and certain recently
incurred DURECT expenses the parties negotiated for Innocoll to reimburse. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we recognized $4.1
million as collaborative research and development and other revenue, $1.1 million as product revenue, and a reduction of $0.1
million in net equipment. At December 31, 2021, we included $5.3 million due from Innocoll in accounts receivable on our
balance sheet; these funds were received in January 2022. In August 2022, we were issued a new patent by the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office ("USPTO"), extending U.S. patent coverage of POSIMIR to at least 2041, resulting in an $8.0 million milestone
payment by Innocoll to the Company. In September 2022, Innocoll launched POSIMIR in the U.S., triggering a $2.0 million
milestone payment to the Company for the first commercial sale of
10
POSIMIR. As the commercial launch of POSIMIR progresses, we have and will continue to earn tiered, low double-digit to mid-teen
royalties on net product sales of POSIMIR in the U.S. We may earn additional milestone payments up to $122.0 million in the
aggregate, depending on the achievement of certain commercial, regulatory and intellectual property milestones with respect to
POSIMIR. Pursuant to the terms of the Innocoll Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Innocoll Agreement,
Innocoll is responsible for expenses relating to the manufacturing, development and commercialization of POSIMIR in the U.S.
PERSERIS™ (risperidone)
In September 2017, we entered into an agreement with Indivior, under which we assigned to Indivior certain patents that
may provide further intellectual property protection for PERSERIS, Indivior’s extended-release injectable suspension for the
treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Under the terms of the agreement with Indivior, we receive quarterly earn-out payments
that are based on a single-digit percentage of U.S. net sales of PERSERIS into 2026. Indivior commercially launched PERSERIS in
the U.S. in February 2019.
ORADUR™-ADHD Program
We developed a proprietary drug product for the treatment of ADHD called Methydur in collaboration with Orient Pharma, a
diversified multinational pharmaceutical, healthcare and consumer products company with headquarters in Taiwan. We have
licensed worldwide Methydur rights to Orient Pharma and they launched Methydur commercially in Taiwan in September 2020.
Orient Pharma may seek commercialization partners in other countries throughout the world, including China and the U.S. We
receive a single-digit royalty on sales of Methydur by Orient Pharma or its commercialization partners as well as potential
milestones and sub-license fees.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to develop multiple pharmaceutical products that address significant unmet medical needs and improve
patients’ quality of life. To achieve this objective, our strategy includes the following key elements:
Complete Clinical Development and Seek Regulatory Approval of Larsucosterol for the Treatment of AH. In the fourth
quarter of 2023, we completed our Phase 2b clinical trial (AHFIRM) as described above. We are in ongoing communications with
the FDA regarding next steps for the development of larsucosterol, including the trial design for a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial in
AH.
Maximize the Commercial Potential of Larsucosterol in AH. We are exploring the best approach to maximize the
commercial potential of larsucosterol, either by licensing to a commercial entity or continuing to develop and commercialize
larsucosterol ourselves. We believe that, if approved in the United States, a highly specialized commercial organization could
support the commercialization of larsucosterol in the United States. We believe this market can be effectively addressed with a
modest-sized commercial organization, including a hospital-focused sales force focused on hospitals. We may also seek strategic
collaborations to commercialize larsucosterol outside the United States.
Enable Product Development Through Strategic Agreements. We believe that entering into selective strategic
collaborations and other arrangements with respect to our product development programs and technology can enhance the
success of our product development and commercialization, leverage and exploit the value of our intellectual property portfolio,
mitigate our risk and enable us to better manage our operating costs. Additionally, such collaborations and arrangements enable
us to leverage investment by third parties and reduce our net cash burn, while retaining significant economic rights.
11
Strategic Agreements
We have entered into the following strategic collaboration and other key agreements:
Innocoll Pharmaceuticals Limited. In December 2021, we entered into the Innocoll Agreement, pursuant to which, we
granted to Innocoll an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop, manufacture and commercialize
POSIMIR in the U.S. with respect to all uses and applications in humans. The Innocoll Agreement provides for the assignment of
our supply agreement with a contract manufacturing organization to Innocoll and also provides Innocoll with the right, within the
U.S., to expand the approved indications of POSIMIR. We retain, outside the United States, all of the global rights to POSIMIR.
Innocoll paid us an initial non-refundable, upfront fee of $4.0 million as well as a fee in the amount of $1.3 million primarily to
cover the manufacturing supplies and excipients and certain equipment transferred to Innocoll pursuant to the terms of the
Innocoll Agreement, and certain recently incurred DURECT expenses the parties negotiated for Innocoll to reimburse. In the
fourth quarter of 2021, we recognized $4.1 million as collaborative research and development and other revenue, $1.1 million as
product revenue, and a reduction of $0.1 million in net equipment. At December 31, 2021, we included $5.3 million due from
Innocoll in accounts receivable on our balance sheet; these funds were received in January 2022. In August 2022, we were issued
a new patent by the USPTO, extending U.S. patent coverage of POSIMIR to at least 2041, resulting in an $8.0 million milestone
payment by Innocoll to the Company. In September 2022, Innocoll launched POSIMIR in the U.S., triggering a $2.0 million
milestone payment to the Company for the first commercial sale of POSIMIR. Thus, we recognized $10.0 million of milestone
revenue under the agreement with Innocoll during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022. As the commercial launch of
POSIMIR progresses, we have and will continue to earn tiered, low double-digit to mid-teen royalties on net product sales of
POSIMIR in the U.S. We may earn additional milestone payments up to $122.0 million in the aggregate, depending on the
achievement of certain commercial, regulatory and intellectual property milestones with respect to POSIMIR.
Pursuant to the terms of the Innocoll Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Innocoll Agreement,
Innocoll is responsible for expenses relating to the manufacturing, development and commercialization of POSIMIR in the United
States. The Innocoll Agreement includes customary representations and warranties on behalf of us and Innocoll, including
representations as to the licensed intellectual property, regulatory matters and compliance with applicable laws. The Innocoll
Agreement also provides for certain mutual indemnities for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants.
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation. In December 2012, we entered into an exclusive in-
license and research and development agreement with the Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation
regarding certain new chemical entities under development through our Epigenetic Regulator Program, including larsucosterol.
Under this licensing arrangement, we agreed to undertake certain efforts to bring licensed products to market, pay for
prosecution of related patents and report on progress to VCU. In addition, we are obligated to pay low single-digit percentage
patent royalties on net sales of licensed products, subject to annual minimum payments and additional milestone payments. This
license includes rights to ten patent families. We may terminate this agreement at any time by written notice, and VCU may
terminate this agreement by written notice if there is an uncured material breach.
Indivior UK Ltd. In September 2017, we entered into an agreement with Indivior, under which we assigned to Indivior
certain patents that may provide further intellectual property protection for PERSERIS, Indivior’s extended-release injectable
suspension for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Under the terms of the agreement with Indivior, we receive quarterly
earn-out payments that are based on a single digit percentage of U.S. net sales of PERSERIS into 2026. Indivior commercially
launched PERSERIS in the U.S. in February 2019. The agreement contains customary representations, warranties and indemnities
of the parties.
12
ALZET Commercial Product Line
The ALZET product line consists of miniature, implantable osmotic pumps and accessories used for research in mice, rats
and other laboratory animals. These pumps are neither approved nor intended for human use. ALZET pumps continuously deliver
drugs, hormones and other test agents at controlled rates from one day to six weeks without the need for external connections,
frequent handling or repeated dosing. In laboratory research, these infusion pumps can be used for systemic administration when
implanted under the skin or in the body. They can be attached to a catheter for IV, intracerebral, or intra-arterial infusion or for
targeted delivery, where the effects of a drug or test agent are localized in a particular tissue or organ. The wide use and
applications of the ALZET product line is evidenced by the more than 22,000 scientific references that now exist.
Marketing and Sales
Historically, we have established strategic distribution and marketing alliances for our product candidates to leverage the
established sales organizations that certain pharmaceutical companies have in markets we are targeting. In the future, we may
elect to build our own commercial, sales and marketing capability in order to capture more of the economic value of certain
products that we may develop. If we choose to enter into third-party collaborations to commercialize our pharmaceutical product
candidates, we may in the future enter into these alliances under circumstances that allow us to participate in the sales and
marketing of these products. We will continue to pursue strategic alliances and collaborators from time to time consistent with
our strategy to leverage the established sales organizations of third-party collaborators.
We market and sell our ALZET product line through a direct sales force in the U.S. and through a network of distributors
outside of the U.S. In March 2024, we announced that we had entered into a co-marketing and collaboration agreement with
Charles River Laboratories (“Charles River”) to jointly market and commercialize the ALZET product line to existing and new
customers in the pharmaceutical industry and academic laboratories over a multi-year period. Charles River will provide
dedicated marketing resources and collaborate with our team to develop and roll out a broad range of sales and marketing
initiatives for ALZET. We remain responsible for manufacturing, marketing support, order fulfillment and customer billing.
Suppliers
We purchase the larsucosterol drug substance from a third-party manufacturer and larsucosterol clinical trial materials from
another third-party manufacturer. As needed, we purchase sucrose acetate isobutyrate, a raw material for our SABER-based
pharmaceutical systems, including Methydur, POSIMIR, and ORADUR. We expect that we will continue to be able to obtain
sufficient supply of these raw materials to meet our needs for the foreseeable future. We do not have in place long term supply
agreements with respect to all of the components of any of our pharmaceutical product candidates, however, and are subject to
the risk that we may not be able to procure all required components in adequate quantities with acceptable quality, within
acceptable time frames or at reasonable cost.
Customers
Our product revenues principally are derived from sales of the ALZET product line to academic and pharmaceutical industry
researchers, and from the sale of certain key excipients that are included in POSIMIR, Methydur Sustained Release Capsules, and
other products. Until such time that we are able to bring our pharmaceutical product candidates to market, if at all, we expect
these to be our principal sources of product revenue. We also receive revenue from collaborative research and development
arrangements with third-party collaborators and earn-out revenue from our patent purchase agreement. In 2023, Indivior
accounted for 20% of our total revenue.
Manufacturing
The process for manufacturing our pharmaceutical product candidates is technically complex, requires special skills, and
must be performed in qualified facilities. We have entered into development and commercial manufacturing agreements with
third parties for the manufacture of larsucosterol and POSIMIR (now assigned to Innocoll). In addition, we have a small multi-
discipline manufacturing facility
13
in California that we have used to manufacture research and clinical supplies of several of our pharmaceutical product candidates
under good manufacturing practice (“GMP”), including larsucosterol dosage forms. In the future, we may develop additional
manufacturing capabilities for our pharmaceutical product candidates and components to meet our demands and those of our
third-party collaborators by contracting with third party manufacturers and by potentially constructing additional manufacturing
space at our current facilities in California. We manufacture our ALZET product line and certain key components for POSIMIR and
Methydur at one of our California facilities.
Patents and Proprietary Rights
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents, to protect trade secrets, to operate without infringing upon the
proprietary rights of others and to prevent others from infringing on our proprietary rights. Our policy is to seek to protect our
proprietary position by, among other methods, filing U.S. and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary molecules and
technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business. As of March 26, 2024, we
owned or exclusively in-licensed over 15 unexpired issued U.S. patents and over 165 unexpired issued foreign patents (which
include granted European patent rights that have been validated in various EU member states). In addition, we have over 20
pending U.S. patent applications and over 135 foreign applications pending in Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada and other
countries.
The patent status of our most advanced drug candidates is as follows:
Our Epigenetic Regulator Program includes ten in-licensed patent families and eleven patent families solely owned by us.
Eight patent families each include at least one granted patent that could provide protection until at least 2026, 2032, 2033, 2034,
2035, 2037, 2037 and 2037, respectively. The other patent families include pending patent applications, which if granted, could
result in patents providing protection until at least 2040 to 2044. Patent terms are potentially subject to terminal disclaimers as
well as patent term adjustments and extensions. Of the twenty-one patent families covering larsucosterol and/or other molecules
in the Epigenetic Regulator Program, two were only filed in the United States, and the other nineteen have been filed or likely will
be filed both in the U.S. and internationally. Since larsucosterol is an endogenous molecule, patent claims directed to
larsucosterol compositions of matter may be more difficult to maintain or enforce in the United States under Myriad Genetics and
other recent court decisions. One of the U.S. patents issued before Myriad Genetics, and nine of the larsucosterol U.S. patents
issued after Myriad Genetics. The granted claims in the U.S. include both composition of matter and method of treatment claims.
There can be no assurance that the pending patent applications will be granted. Further, there can be no assurance that VCU will
not attempt to terminate their license to us, which termination could result in the loss of our rights to these patent families.
In the United States, POSIMIR is covered by four patent families. Three patent families include granted patents that could
provide protection until 2025, 2026 and 2041, respectively. The other patent family includes a pending patent application, which
if granted, could result in a patent expiring in 2042. In Europe, POSIMIR is covered by two granted patents with one that could
expire in 2025 and one that could expire in 2026. The patent family that could provide protection until at least 2041 has been
filed in Europe.
Proprietary rights relating to our planned and potential products will be protected from unauthorized use by third parties
only to the extent that they are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. Patents
owned by or licensed to us may not afford protection against competitors, and our pending patent applications now or hereafter
filed by or licensed to us may not result in patents being issued. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect
our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S.
14
The patent positions of biopharmaceutical companies involve complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, their
enforceability cannot be predicted with certainty. Our patents or patent applications, or those licensed to us, if issued, may be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and the rights granted thereunder may not provide proprietary protection or
competitive advantages to us against competitors with similar technology. Furthermore, our competitors may independently
develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology developed by us. Because of the extensive time required for
development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that, before any of our products can be
commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in existence for only a short period following commercialization, thus
reducing any advantage of the patent, which could adversely affect our ability to protect future product development and,
consequently, our operating results and financial position.
Because patent applications in the U.S. are typically maintained in secrecy for at least 18 months after filing and since
publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we
were the first to make inventions or file for protection of inventions set forth in our patents or patent applications.
Our planned or potential products may be covered by third-party patents or other intellectual property rights, in which case
we may need to obtain a license to continue developing or marketing these products. Any required licenses may not be available
to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we do not obtain any required licenses, we could encounter delays in product introductions
while we attempt to design around these patents, or could find that the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring
such licenses is foreclosed. Litigation may be necessary to defend against or assert such claims of infringement, to enforce
patents issued to us, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us, or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary
rights of others. In addition, interference, derivation, post-grant oppositions, and similar proceedings may be necessary to
determine rights to inventions in our patents and patent applications. Litigation or similar proceedings could result in substantial
costs to and diversion of effort by us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. These efforts by us may not be successful.
We may rely, in certain circumstances, on trade secrets to protect our technology. However, trade secrets are difficult to
protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees
and certain contractors. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that we will have adequate
remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered by
competitors. To the extent that our employees, consultants or contractors use intellectual property owned by others in their work
for us, disputes may also arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
Government Regulation
The FDA and comparable regulatory agencies in state and local jurisdictions and in foreign countries impose substantial
requirements upon the development, manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical products. These agencies and other federal,
state and local entities regulate research and development activities and, among other things, the testing, manufacture, quality
control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, distribution, record keeping, approval, advertising and promotion of our products.
We believe that our products in development will be regulated as drugs by the FDA rather than as biologics or devices.
U.S. Drug Development Process
The standard process required by the FDA under the new drug provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (the
“FDCA”) before our products in development may be marketed in the U.S. generally involves the following:
•
preclinical laboratory and animal tests performed under current good laboratory practices;
15
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application which must become effective before human
clinical trials may begin;
approval by an independent institutional review board (“IRB”) or ethics committee before each human clinical trial may
be initiated;
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with IND regulations, code of good
clinical practice (“GCP”), requirements and other clinical trial-related regulations to establish the safety and efficacy of
the proposed pharmaceutical product candidates in their intended uses;
submission of an NDA to the FDA for approval of commercial marketing and sale, or of an NDA supplement for approval
of a new indication if the proposed pharmaceutical product candidate is already approved for another indication;
satisfactory completion of an FDA pre-approval inspection of manufacturing facilities and selected clinical investigators
for their compliance with current good manufacturing practice and current GCPs;
if the FDA convenes an advisory committee, satisfactory completion of the advisory committee review;
FDA approval of an NDA; and
compliance with any post-approval requirements, including the potential requirement to conduct post-approval studies.
Section 505 of the FDCA describes three types of NDAs: (1) an application that contains full reports of investigations of
safety and effectiveness (section 505(b)(1)); (2) an application that contains full reports of investigations of safety and
effectiveness but where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies not conducted by or for the
applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference (section 505(b)(2)); and (3) an application that
contains information to show that the proposed pharmaceutical product candidate is identical in active ingredient, dosage form,
strength, route of administration, labeling, quality, performance characteristics and intended use, among other things, to a
previously approved product (section 505(j)). We expect that our drug candidates deriving from our Epigenetic Regulator
Program will be evaluated for approval after submission of an NDA under section 505(b)(1).
The testing and approval process require substantial time, effort, and financial resources, and we cannot be certain that
any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Preclinical development of a drug candidate can take several years to
complete, with no guarantee that an IND based on those studies will become effective to even permit clinical testing to begin.
Even though several of our pharmaceutical product candidates utilize active drug ingredients that are commercially marketed in
the United States in other dosage forms, we need to establish safety and effectiveness of those active ingredients in the
formulation and dosage forms that we are developing.
Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of the product candidate, its chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as
animal studies to assess the potential safety and efficacy of the pharmaceutical product candidate. We then submit the results of
the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, to the FDA as part of an IND, which must
become effective before we may begin human clinical trials. Each subsequent new clinical protocol must also be submitted to the
FDA under the IND. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30-Day
time period, raises concerns or questions about the conduct of the trials as outlined in the IND and imposes a clinical hold. In
such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before clinical trials can begin. Our submission
of an IND may not
16
result in FDA authorization to commence clinical trials. A separate submission to the existing IND must be made for each
successive clinical trial conducted during product development. Further, an independent IRB at each medical center proposing to
conduct the clinical trials must review and approve any clinical study as well as the related informed consent forms and
authorization forms that permit us to use individually identifiable health information of study participants.
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap:
•
•
•
Phase 1: The drug is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients and tested for safety, dosage
tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion.
Phase 2: The drug is administered to a limited patient population with the target disease or condition in clinical trials
to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product candidate for
specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
Phase 3: When Phase 2 clinical trials demonstrate that a dosage range of the product candidate is effective and has
an acceptable safety profile, Phase 3 clinical trials are undertaken and the drug is administered to an expanded patient
population to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy and to further test for safety in well-controlled clinical trials to
generate enough data to statistically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the product candidate for approval, to
establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product candidate, and to provide adequate information for the labeling
of the product.
In the case of product candidates for severe diseases, such as chronic pain, or life-threatening diseases such as cancer, the
initial human testing is often conducted in patients with the target diseases or conditions rather than in healthy volunteers. Since
these patients already have the target disease or condition, these studies may provide initial evidence of efficacy traditionally
obtained in Phase 2 trials, and thus these trials are frequently referred to as Phase 1/2 clinical trials or Phase 1b trials. Progress
reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if serious
adverse events occur. We cannot be certain that we will successfully complete Phase 1, Phase 2 or Phase 3 clinical trials of our
pharmaceutical product candidates in development within any specific time period, if at all. Furthermore, the FDA or the IRB or
the sponsor may suspend clinical trials at any time for various reasons, including a finding that the subjects or patients are being
exposed to an unacceptable health risk. During the clinical development of product candidates, sponsors frequently meet and
consult with the FDA to ensure that the design of their studies will likely provide data both sufficient and relevant for later
regulatory review; however, no assurance of approvability can be given by the FDA.
NDA Review and Approval Processes
Assuming successful completion of all testing in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements, the results of
product development, preclinical studies and clinical studies are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA for approval of the
marketing and commercial shipment of the product. Submission of an NDA may require the payment of a substantial user fee to
the FDA, and although the agency has defined user fee goals for the time in which to respond to sponsor applications, there can
be no assurance that the FDA will act in any particular timeframe. The FDA may deny approval of an NDA if the applicable
regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical trials be conducted. Even if such data is submitted, the FDA
may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. An NDA may be approved with significant
restrictions on its labeling, marketing and distribution under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy or otherwise that could
restrict the commercial applications of a product or impose costly procedures in connection with the commercialization or use of
the product. Once issued, the FDA may withdraw product approval if ongoing regulatory standards are not maintained or if safety
problems occur after the product reaches the market. Requirements for additional Phase 4 studies (post approval marketing
studies) to confirm safety and effectiveness in a broader commercial use population may be imposed as a condition of marketing
approval. In addition, the FDA may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the effects of
17
approved products which have been commercialized, and the FDA has the power to require changes in labeling or to prevent
further marketing of a product based on the results of these post-marketing programs. Any comparative claims comparing a
product to other dosage forms or competitive products typically need to be supported by two adequate and well-controlled head-
to-head clinical trials.
Satisfaction of FDA requirements or similar requirements of state, local and foreign regulatory agencies typically takes
several years and the actual time required may vary substantially, based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the
pharmaceutical product and of the disease or condition. Government regulation may delay or prevent marketing of potential
products for a considerable period of time and impose costly procedures upon our activities. We cannot be certain that the FDA
or any other regulatory agency will grant approval for any of our pharmaceutical products under development on a timely basis,
if at all. Success in preclinical or early-stage clinical trials does not assure success in later stage clinical trials. Targets and
pathways identified in vitro may be determined to be less relevant in clinical studies and results in animal model studies may not
be predictive of human clinical results. Furthermore, data obtained from clinical activities is not always conclusive and may be
susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Evolving safety concerns can
result in the imposition of new requirements for expensive and time-consuming tests, such as for QT interval cardiotoxicity
testing. Even if a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific indications. Further,
even after regulatory approval is obtained, any problems associated with a product may result in restrictions on the product or
even complete withdrawal of the product from the market. Any pharmaceutical products that we may develop and obtain
approval for would also be subject to adverse findings of the active drug ingredients being marketed in different dosage forms
and formulations. Delays in obtaining, or failures to obtain regulatory approvals would have a material adverse effect on our
business. Marketing our pharmaceutical products abroad will require similar regulatory approvals and is subject to similar risks. In
addition, we cannot predict what adverse governmental regulations may arise from future U.S. or foreign governmental action.
Expedited Development and Review Programs
There are several FDA programs intended to help facilitate the development of new drugs that meet certain criteria.
Specifically, new drugs are eligible for Fast Track designation if they are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition
and demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the condition. Fast Track designation applies to the
combination of the product and the specific indication for which it is being studied. The sponsor of a new drug may request the
FDA to designate the drug as a Fast Track product at any time during the clinical development of the product. Under a Fast Track
designation, the FDA may consider for review sections of the marketing application on a rolling basis before the complete
application is submitted, if the sponsor provides a schedule for the submission of the sections of the application, the FDA agrees
to accept sections of the application and determines that the schedule is acceptable, and the sponsor pays any required user
fees upon submission of the first section of the application.
A product candidate is eligible for priority review if it has the potential to provide safe and effective therapy where no
satisfactory alternative therapy exists or a significant improvement in the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of a disease
compared to marketed products. The FDA will attempt to direct additional resources to the evaluation of an application for a new
drug or biological product designated for priority review to facilitate the review. Under priority review, the FDA’s goal is to review
an application in six months once it is filed, compared to ten months for a standard review. Priority review designation does not
change the scientific/medical standard for approval or the quality of evidence necessary to support approval.
Additionally, a product candidate that is being studied for safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening
illnesses and provides meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments may receive accelerated approval, which means
that it may be approved on the basis of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials establishing that the product has an effect on
a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit, or on the basis of an effect on an intermediate clinical
18
endpoint other than survival or irreversible morbidity, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and
the availability or lack of alternative treatments. As a condition of approval, the FDA may require that a sponsor of a drug
receiving accelerated approval perform adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical trials with due diligence and, under
the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (“FDORA”), the FDA is permitted to require, as appropriate, that such trials be
underway prior to approval or within a specific time period after the date of approval for a product granted accelerated approval.
In addition, for products being considered for accelerated approval, unless otherwise informed by the FDA, the FDA generally
requires that all advertising and promotional materials intended for dissemination or publication within 120 days following
marketing approval be submitted to the agency for review during the pre-approval review period, and that after 120 days
following marketing approval, all advertising and promotional materials must be submitted at least 30 days prior to the intended
time of initial dissemination or publication. Under FDORA, the FDA has increased authority for expedited procedures to withdraw
approval of a drug or indication approved under accelerated approval if, for example, the confirmatory trial fails to verify the
predicted clinical benefit of the product.
A product may also be eligible for receipt of a Breakthrough Therapy designation under the provisions of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation Act (“FDASIA”). The Breakthrough Therapy designation is intended to expedite the FDA’s
review of a potential new drug for serious or life-threatening diseases where “preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug
may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as
substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development.” The designation of a drug as a Breakthrough Therapy
provides the same benefits as are available under the Fast Track program, as well as intensive FDA guidance on the product’s
development program. If a drug is designated as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA will provide more intensive guidance on the
drug development program and expedite its review. Fast Track designation, priority review, accelerated approval and
Breakthrough Therapy designation do not change the standards for approval, but they may expedite the development or
approval process.
Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or
condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or 200,000 or
more individuals in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making
the product available in the United States for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product. Orphan
drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the identity of the
therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any
advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process. If a product that has orphan drug
designation subsequently receives FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is
entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug
for the same indication, except in limited circumstances, for seven years. These circumstances are an inability to supply the drug
in sufficient quantities or a situation in which a new formulation of the orphan drug has shown superior safety or efficacy or a
major contribution to patient care. Competitors, however, may receive approval of either a different product for the same
indication or the same product for a different indication but that could be used off-label in the orphan indication. Orphan drug
exclusivity could also block the approval of one of our products for seven years if a competitor obtains earlier approval of the
same product, as defined by the FDA, for the same indication we are seeking approval, or if our product is determined to be
contained within the scope of the competitor’s product for the same indication or disease. If we pursue marketing approval for an
indication broader than the orphan drug
19
designation we have received, we may not be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity. Orphan drug status in the European Union
(“EU”) has similar, but not identical, requirements and benefits.
Post-Approval Regulation
Any pharmaceutical products manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and
continuing regulation by the FDA, including record-keeping requirements and reporting of adverse experiences with the product
or the active pharmaceutical ingredient or other components of the product. The FDA may also require post-approval clinical or
non-clinical trials. Drug manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and
state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and state agencies for compliance with good
manufacturing practices, which impose procedural and documentation requirements upon us and our third-party manufacturers.
We cannot be certain that we or our present or future suppliers will be able to comply with the GMP regulations and other FDA
regulatory requirements.
The FDCA strictly regulates drug product marketing, prohibits manufacturers from marketing drug products for off-label use
and regulates the distribution of drug samples. The FDA has actively enforced regulations prohibiting the marketing of products
for unapproved uses, and federal and state authorities are also actively litigating against sponsors who promote their drugs for
unapproved uses under various fraud and abuse and false claims act statutes. We and our products are also subject to a variety
of state laws and regulations in those states or localities where our products are or will be marketed. Any applicable state or local
regulations may hinder our ability to market our products in those states or localities. We are also subject to numerous federal,
state and local laws relating to such matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, environmental protection, fire
hazard control, and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances. We may incur significant costs to comply with
such laws and regulations now or in the future.
The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted which could prevent or delay
regulatory approval of our product candidates. Moreover, increased attention to the containment of health care costs in the U.S.
and in foreign markets could result in new government regulations that could have a material adverse effect on our business. We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or
administrative action, either in the U.S. or abroad.
The Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") regulates chemical compounds as Schedule I, II, III, IV or V substances, with
Schedule I substances considered to present the highest risk of substance abuse and Schedule V substances the lowest risk.
Certain active ingredients in ORADUR-Methylphenidate are listed by the DEA as Schedule II under the Controlled Substances Act
of 1970. Consequently, their manufacture, research, shipment, storage, sale and use are subject to a high degree of oversight
and regulation. For example, all Schedule II drug prescriptions must be signed by a physician, physically presented to a
pharmacist and may not be refilled without a new prescription. Furthermore, the amount of Schedule II substances we can obtain
for clinical trials and commercial distribution is limited by the DEA and our quota may not be sufficient to complete clinical trials
or meet commercial demand. There is a risk that DEA regulations may interfere with the supply of the drugs used in our clinical
trials, and, in the future, our ability to produce and distribute our products in the volume needed to meet commercial demand,
which could negatively impact us and our collaborators.
Other Healthcare Laws
In addition to FDA and DEA restrictions on the marketing of pharmaceutical products, other foreign, federal and state
healthcare regulatory laws restrict business practices in the pharmaceutical industry. These laws include, but are not limited to,
federal and state anti‑kickback, false claims, data privacy and security, and physician payment and drug pricing transparency
laws.
20
The U.S. federal Anti‑Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly and willfully
offering, paying, soliciting, receiving or providing any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, to induce or in
return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease, or order of any good, facility, item
or service reimbursable, in whole or in part, under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. The term
“remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value. The Anti‑Kickback Statute has been interpreted to
apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers,
formulary managers and beneficiaries on the other hand. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory
safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly. Practices
that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases, or recommendations may be
subject to scrutiny if they do not meet the requirements of a statutory or regulatory exception or safe harbor. Failure to meet all
of the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se
illegal under the U.S. federal Anti‑Kickback Statute. Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case‑by‑case
basis based on a cumulative review of all its facts and circumstances. Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent
requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal
healthcare covered business, the statute has been violated. In addition, a person or entity does not need to have actual
knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. Moreover, a claim including items
or services resulting from a violation of the U.S. federal Anti‑Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes
of the federal civil False Claims Act. The majority of states also have anti‑kickback laws, which establish similar prohibitions and,
in some cases, may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third‑party payor, including commercial insurers.
The federal false claims laws, including the civil False Claims Act, prohibit, among other things, any person or entity from
knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false, fictitious or fraudulent claim for payment to, or approval by, the federal
government, knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent
claim to the federal government, or knowingly making a false statement to avoid, decrease, or conceal an obligation to pay
money to the U.S. federal government. A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S.
government. Actions under the civil False Claims Act may be brought by the Attorney General or as a qui tam action by a private
individual in the name of the government. Moreover, a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the U.S.
federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.
The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics, and medical
supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific
exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMMS”), information related to payments or
other “transfers of value” made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, and chiropractors),
certain non-physician providers (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse
anesthetists and anesthesiologist assistants, and certified-nurse midwives), and teaching hospitals, and applicable manufacturers
and applicable group purchasing organizations to report annually to CMMS ownership and investment interests held by physicians
and their immediate family members.
There are federal price reporting laws, which require manufacturers to calculate and report complex pricing metrics to
government programs, and such reported prices may be used in the calculation of reimbursement and/or discounts on approved
products.
Similar state and local laws and regulations may also restrict business practices in the pharmaceutical industry, such as
state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to business practices, including but not limited to, research,
distribution, sales, and marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-
governmental third-party payors, including private insurers, or by patients themselves; state laws that require pharmaceutical
companies to
21
comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated
by the federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral
sources; state laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to pricing information and marketing
expenditures or which require tracking gifts, compensation and other remuneration and items of value provided to physicians,
other healthcare professionals and entities; and state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales
representatives. Finally, the Physician Self-Referral (“Stark”) Law prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid
patients to providers of “designated health services” with whom the physician or a member of the physician’s immediate family
has an ownership interest or compensation arrangement, unless a statutory or regulatory exception applies.
Violations of any of these laws and other applicable healthcare fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal and
civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, the possibility of exclusion from federal healthcare programs
(including Medicare and Medicaid), disgorgement and corporate integrity agreements, which impose, among other things,
rigorous operational and monitoring requirements on companies. Similar sanctions and penalties, as well as imprisonment, also
can be imposed upon executive officers and employees of such companies.
Coverage and Reimbursement
Sales of any pharmaceutical product depend, in part, on the extent to which such product will be covered by third-party
payors, such as federal, state and foreign government healthcare programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare
organizations, and the level of reimbursement for such product by third-party payors. In the United States, no uniform policy
exists for coverage and reimbursement for pharmaceutical products among third-party payors. Therefore, decisions regarding the
extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided are made on a plan-by-plan basis. The process for determining
whether a third-party payor will provide coverage for a product typically is separate from the process for setting the price of such
product or for establishing the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved.
Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not
include all of the FDA-approved products for a particular indication, or place products at certain formulary levels that result in
lower reimbursement levels and higher cost-sharing obligation imposed on patients. One third-party payor’s decision to cover a
particular medical product or service does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage for the medical product or
service, and the level of coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, the coverage
determination process will often require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor
separately, which can be a time-consuming process, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be
applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. Additionally, a third-party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a product
does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved.
Moreover, as a condition of participating in, and having products covered under, certain federal healthcare programs, such
as Medicare and Medicaid, we may become subject to federal laws and regulations that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to
calculate and report certain price reporting metrics to the government, such as Medicaid Average Manufacturer Price (“AMP”),
and Best Price, Medicare Average Sales Price, the 340B Ceiling Price and Non-Federal AMP reported to the Department of Veteran
Affairs, and with respect to Medicaid, pay statutory rebates on utilization of manufacturers’ products by Medicaid beneficiaries.
Compliance with such laws and regulations require significant resources and any findings of non-compliance may have a material
adverse effect on our revenues.
Healthcare Reform
In the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of
legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system. In the United States, by way of example, in March 2010, the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care Education and Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “Affordable
Care Act”), was
22
enacted in the United States. Among the provisions of the Affordable Care Act of importance to our potential product candidates,
the Affordable Care Act: established an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures or imports certain specified
branded prescription drugs and biologic agents; expanded eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs; increased the statutory
minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program; created a Medicare Part D coverage gap
discount program; established a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in and conduct
comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research; and established a Center for Medicare &
Medicaid Innovation at Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to test innovative payment and service delivery models to lower
Medicare and Medicaid spending.
There have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act. For
example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 included a provision that repealed, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared
responsibility payment imposed by the Affordable Care Act on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage
for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate.” On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court
dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional in its entirety because the
individual mandate was repealed by Congress. Thus, the Affordable Care Act will remain in effect in its current form. However, it
is possible that the Affordable Care Act will be subject to additional judicial or Congressional challenges in the future.
Further, the Affordable Care Act has been subject to various health reform measures. For example, prior to the U.S.
Supreme Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, the Biden administration issued an executive order that initiated a special enrollment
period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act marketplace. The executive order
also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to
healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work
requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid
or the Affordable Care Act. In addition, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”)
into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in
Affordable Care Act marketplaces through plan year 2025 and includes several measures intended to lower the cost of
prescription drugs and related healthcare reforms. Specifically, the IRA authorizes and directs the Department of Health and
Human Services (“HHS”) to set drug price caps for certain high-cost Medicare Part B and Part D qualified drugs, with the initial list
of drugs to be selected by September 1, 2023, and the first year of maximum price applicability to begin in 2026. The IRA further
authorizes the HHS to penalize pharmaceutical manufacturers that increase the price of certain Medicare Part B and Part D drugs
faster than the rate of inflation. On June 30, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), issued new guidance
detailing the requirements and parameters of the first round of price negotiations, to take place during 2023 and 2024, for
products subject to the “maximum fair price” provision that would become effective in 2026. On August 29, 2023, HHS
announced the list of the first ten drugs that will be subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare drug price negotiation
program is currently subject to legal challenges. CMS and HHS will continue to issue and update guidance as these programs are
implemented. Finally, the IRA creates significant changes to the Medicare Part D benefit design by capping Part D beneficiaries’
annual out-of-pocket spending at $2,000 and eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program, both beginning in
2025, by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost through a newly established manufacturer discount
program. In addition, on December 7, 2023, the Biden administration announced an initiative to control the price of prescription
drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (“NIST”) published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In
Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in
rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework.
The implementation of government-imposed cost containment measures or other healthcare
23
reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our product candidates if
approved. It is currently unclear how any such challenges and other litigation, and the healthcare reform measures of the current
U.S. presidential administration will impact the Affordable Care Act and our business as well as how the IRA will be effectuated.
Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. These changes
include reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year that will remain in effect through 2031 unless
additional Congressional action is taken, except for a temporary suspension from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022 and
limited reductions to 1% from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic with the 2% payment reduction
having resumed on July 1, 2022. Following the resumption of the sequester, under current legislation, the actual reduction in
Medicare payments will vary from 1% in 2022 to up to 4% in the final fiscal year of this sequester. Further, the American
Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers and
increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.
Additionally, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 into law, which eliminates the
statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for single source and
innovator multiple source drugs, which began on January 1, 2024.
Further, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their
marketed products, which has resulted in several presidential executive orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed and
enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the
relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement
methodologies for pharmaceutical products. For example, the marketing, pricing and sale of the Company’s products are subject
to regulation, investigations and legal actions including under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program under the Affordable Care Act,
which has increased the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the program as well as a new methodology
by which rebates are owed for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected. We are also subject to federal and
state false claims acts, as well as federal and state antitrust and consumer protection laws. Increased scrutiny of health care
industry business practices in recent years by government agencies and state attorneys general in the U.S., and any resulting
investigations and prosecutions, carry risk of significant civil and criminal penalties including, but not limited to, debarment from
participation in such government healthcare programs.
Individual states in the United States have also become increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing
regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product and medical device pricing, including price or patient reimbursement
constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in
some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on
payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition
and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to
determine what pharmaceutical products and medical devices to purchase and which suppliers will be included in their
prescription drug and other healthcare programs. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or
other restrictions could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
These initiatives, as well as other healthcare reform measures that have been adopted and may be adopted in the future,
may result in more rigorous coverage criteria, new payment methodologies and in additional downward pressure on the price
that we receive for any approved or cleared product and product candidates, if approved, and could seriously harm our future
revenues. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid, or other government programs may result in a similar
reduction in payments from private payors. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may
arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we or our partners are slow or
unable to adapt to new requirements or policies, or if we or our partners are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our
products and product candidates may lose
24
any regulatory approval that may have been obtained, which would reduce the likelihood that we may achieve or sustain
profitability, or be able to enter attractive collaboration agreements, which would adversely affect our business.
Foreign Regulation
Outside the United States, our ability to market a product is contingent upon receiving a marketing authorization from the
appropriate regulatory authorities. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, marketing authorization, pricing and
reimbursement vary widely from country to country. At present, foreign marketing authorizations are applied for at a national
level, although within the EU regional registration procedures are available to companies wishing to market a product in more
than one EU member state. If the competent regulatory authority is satisfied that adequate evidence of safety, quality and
efficacy has been presented, a marketing authorization may be granted. This foreign regulatory approval process involves all of
the risks associated with FDA approval discussed above and may also include additional risks.
Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities in
non-US countries prior to the commencement of clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. Certain countries
outside of the United States have a process that requires the submission of a clinical trial application (“CTA”) much like an IND
prior to the commencement of human clinical trials. In the EU, a CTA must be submitted for each trial to the competent health
authority and to independent ethics committees by national procedure for a single country trial or by EMA submission portal
Clinical Trials Information System for a multinational study. Once the CTA is approved in accordance with the requirements in the
concerned countries, clinical trial development may proceed in those countries and are conducted in accordance with GCP and
other applicable regulatory requirements.
To obtain regulatory approval of an investigational drug under EU regulatory systems, we must submit a marketing
authorization application (“MAA”). This application is similar to the NDA in the United States, with the exception of, among other
things, regional and/or country-specific document requirements. Drugs can be authorized in the EU by using the centralized,
mutual recognition, decentralized or national authorization procedures described below.
The EMA implemented the centralized procedure for the approval of human drugs to facilitate marketing authorizations that
are valid throughout the EU. This procedure results in a single marketing authorization granted by the European Commission that
is valid across the EU. Under the centralized procedure, the maximum timeframe for the evaluation of an MAA by the EMA is 210
days (excluding clock stoppages for requests by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) for additional
written or oral information to be provided by the applicant). A positive opinion on the MAA by the CHMP then needs to be
endorsed by the European Commission within approximately 67 days. Accelerated assessment might be granted by the CHMP in
exceptional cases, in which case the EMA ensures that the evaluation for the opinion of the CHMP is completed within 150 days
(excluding clock stops) and the opinion issued thereafter.
The mutual recognition procedure (“MRP”) for the approval of human drugs is an alternative approach to facilitate
individual national marketing authorizations within the EU. The MRP may be applied for all human drugs for which the centralized
procedure is not obligatory. The MRP is based on the principle of the mutual recognition by EU member states of their respective
national marketing authorizations. Based on a marketing authorization in the reference member state, the applicant may apply
for marketing authorizations in other member states. In such case, the reference member state shall update its existing
assessment report about the drug. After the assessment is completed, copies of the report are sent to all member states,
together with the approved summary of product characteristics, labeling and package leaflet. The concerned member states then
recognize the decision of the reference member state and the summary of product characteristics, labeling and package leaflet.
National marketing authorizations shall be granted within 30 days after acknowledgement of the agreement.
25
Should any member state refuse to recognize the marketing authorization by the reference member state, the member
states shall make all efforts to reach a consensus. If this fails, the procedure is submitted to an EMA scientific committee for
arbitration. The opinion of this EMA Committee is then forwarded to the Commission, for the start of the decision making process.
As in the centralized procedure, this process entails consulting various European Commission Directorates General and the
Standing Committee on Human Medicinal Products or Veterinary Medicinal Products, as appropriate.
Legislation similar to the Orphan Drug Act has been enacted in other countries outside of the United States, including the
EU. The orphan legislation in the EU is available for therapies addressing conditions that affect five or fewer out of 10,000
persons, are life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions and for which no satisfactory treatment is authorized. The
market exclusivity period is for ten years, although that period can be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year,
available evidence establishes that the product does not justify maintenance of market exclusivity.
For other countries outside of the EU, such as non-EU countries in Eastern Europe, Middle-East, Latin America, Japan or
other countries in Asia, the requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement
vary. In all cases, again, the clinical trials are conducted in accordance with GCP and the other applicable regulatory
requirements.
If we fail to comply with applicable foreign regulatory requirements, we may be subject to, among other things, fines,
suspension of clinical trials, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating
restrictions and criminal prosecution.
Competition
We may face competition from other companies in numerous industries including pharmaceuticals, medical devices and
drug delivery.
Competition for larsucosterol, if approved, will depend on the specific indication(s) for which larsucosterol is approved.
Afimmune Ltd., Alfasigma S.p.A., Akaza Bioscience Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Immuron Ltd., Mallinckrodt
plc, MedRegen LLC, Novartis Pharma AG, PharmaKing Co. Ltd, Surrozen, Inc., and others have development plans for products to
treat AH. Our current and potential competitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection or commercializing products before
us. Many of these entities have significantly greater research and development capabilities than we do, as well as substantially
more marketing, manufacturing, financial and managerial resources. These entities represent significant competition for us.
Acquisitions of, or investments in, competing pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies by large corporations could increase
such competitors’ financial, marketing, manufacturing and other resources.
Competition for our ALZET product line primarily consists of customers choosing to utilize delivery methods for their
research projects other than an osmotic pump. We also face competition for our ALZET product line from other companies
including low-cost foreign competitors.
Any pharmaceutical products we develop will compete in highly competitive markets. Many of our potential competitors in
these markets have greater development, financial, manufacturing, marketing, and sales resources than we do and we cannot be
certain that they will not succeed in developing products or technologies which will render our technologies and products
obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, many of those potential competitors have significantly greater experience than we do in
their respective fields.
Corporate History, Headquarters and Website Information
We were incorporated in Delaware in February 1998. Our principal executive offices are located at 10240 Bubb Road,
Cupertino, California 95014. Our telephone number is (408) 777-1417, and our website address is www.durect.com. Information
contained on our website is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the inclusion of our website address in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K is an inactive textual reference only. We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form
26
10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and any amendments to these reports or other information filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably
practicable after we file these reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The SEC maintains an internet site
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the
SEC. The SEC’s website to access all of this information is www.sec.gov. Our Code of Ethics can be found on our website.
We also use our website, including the investor relations section of our website, to announce important information about
us and other matters in order to achieve broad, non-exclusionary distribution of information to the public and to comply with our
disclosure obligations under Regulation Fair Disclosure. We encourage investors and others to review the information we make
public in these locations, as such information could be deemed to be material information. Information contained on or accessible
through our website is not a part of this report, and all website addresses in this report are intended to be inactive textual
references only.
Human Capital
Our approach to human capital resource management starts with our mission to advance novel and potentially lifesaving
investigational therapies derived from our Epigenetic Regulator Program. Our industry exists in a complex regulatory
environment. The unique demands of our industry, together with the challenges of running an enterprise focused on the
discovery, development, manufacture and commercialization of innovative medicines, require talent that is highly educated
and/or has significant industry experience. Additionally, for certain key functions, we require specific scientific expertise to
oversee and conduct R&D activities and the complex manufacturing requirements for biopharmaceutical products.
The biopharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and recruiting and retaining employees is critical to the continued
success of our business. We are an equal opportunity employer and we are fundamentally committed to creating and
maintaining a work environment in which employees are treated with respect and dignity. All human resources policies, practices
and actions related to hiring, promotion, compensation, benefits and termination are administered in accordance with the
principal of equal employment opportunity, meaning that they are made on the basis of individual skills, knowledge, abilities, job
performance and other legitimate criteria and without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression or
identity, ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, age, mental or physical disability, genetic information, any veteran status, any
military status or application for military service, or membership in any other category protected under applicable law. By
focusing on employee retention and engagement, we also improve our ability to support our clinical trials, our pipeline, our
platform technologies, business and operations, and also protect the long-term interests of our stockholders. Our success also
depends on our ability to attract, engage and retain a diverse group of employees.
Our base pay program aims to compensate management and staff members relative to the value of the contributions of
their role, which takes into account the skills, knowledge and abilities required to perform each position, as well as the experience
brought to the job. We also provide annual incentive programs to reward our management team and staff members in alignment
with achievement of Company-wide goals that are established annually and designed to drive aspects of our strategic priorities
that support and advance our strategy across our Company. Our management team and staff members are eligible for the grant
of equity awards under our long-term incentive program that are designed to align the experience of these staff with that of our
stockholders. All management team and staff members also participate in a regular performance measurement process that
aligns pay to performance and through which they receive performance and development feedback.
27
Our benefit programs are also generally broad-based, promote health and overall well-being and emphasize saving for
retirement. All management team and regular staff members are eligible to participate in the same core health and welfare and
retirement savings plans. Other employee benefits include employee stock purchase plan, medical plans, dental plans, vacation
and sick-pay plans, employee assistance programs, flexible spending accounts, life and accident insurance and short and long-
term disability benefits.
Our Compensation Committee provides oversight of our compensation plans, policies and programs.
As of March 26, 2024, we had 58 employees, including 26 in research and development, 9 in manufacturing and 23 in
selling, general and administrative. At least 24 of our employees have advanced degrees of some sort (e.g., MD, PhD, DVM, JD,
MBA). The Company strives for gender diversity and diversity beyond gender throughout the organization. Of our employees,
36% are male and 64% are female. From time to time, we also employ independent contractors to support our research,
development and administrative organizations. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining unit, and we
have never experienced a work stoppage. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers and their ages as of March 26, 2024 are as follows:
Name
James E. Brown, D.V.M.
Timothy M. Papp, M.B.A.
Norman L. Sussman, M.D.
Age
67
48
71
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Medical Officer
Position
James E. Brown, D.V.M., co-founded DURECT in February 1998 and has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer
and on our Board of Directors since June 1998. He previously worked at ALZA Corporation as Vice President of Biopharmaceutical
and Implant Research and Development from June 1995 to June 1998. Prior to that, Dr. Brown held various positions at Syntex
Corporation, a pharmaceutical company, including Director of Business Development from May 1994 to May 1995, Director of
Joint Ventures for Discovery Research from April 1992 to May 1995, and held a number of positions including Program Director for
Syntex Research and Development from October 1985 to March 1992. Dr. Brown holds a B.A. from San Jose State University and
a D.V.M. (Doctor of Veterinary Medicine) from the University of California, Davis where he also conducted post-graduate work in
pharmacology and toxicology.
Timothy M. Papp, MBA, joined DURECT in July 2022 as Chief Financial Officer and brings over 25 years of corporate
finance experience to DURECT, including 15 years in the Biopharma sector. Prior to joining DURECT, he was a Managing Director
of Healthcare Investment Banking at RBC Capital Markets, LLC from 2020 to 2021. Previously he was a Managing Director of
Healthcare Investment Banking at Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (“Stifel”), where he worked from 2010 to 2020. Prior to Stifel,
he was a Vice President of Healthcare Investment Banking at Cowen and Company, LLC (“Cowen”), where he worked from 2007
to 2010. Mr. Papp also held positions at KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Rodman & Renshaw LLC prior to joining Cowen. Mr.
Papp graduated from Duke University with a Bachelor of Science in economics and earned a Master of Business Administration
from The Wharton School with a concentration in finance.
28
Norman L. Sussman, M.D., FAASLD, joined DURECT as Chief Medical Officer in November 2020. He has extensive
clinical experience and expertise in the field of liver disease and brings over 30 years of clinical research and development
experience in academia and industry. Prior to joining DURECT he was an Associate Professor of Medicine and Surgery at Baylor
College of Medicine and a faculty member of Baylor College of Medicine intermittently since 1985. During that time, he served as
a Principal Investigator for research focused on the assessment and management of acute liver failure and artificial liver support.
Dr. Sussman gained leadership experience in industry as the founder and Vice President of both Amphioxus Cell Technologies
from 1995 to 2003 and Hepatix, Inc from 1993 to 1995. Most recently, he has also served in senior leadership roles as a member
of the Baylor Faculty Senate and as Director of the telehealth program, Project ECHO®, at Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center. Dr.
Sussman received his MBBCh from the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. He then completed his
residency at St. Louis University Hospital and his post-doctoral fellowship at Washington University. He is Board Certified in
Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology, and Transplant Hepatology. Dr. Sussman is also a Fellow of the American Association of the
Study of Liver Disease, which is a designation that recognizes his superior level of professional achievement in the field of
hepatology.
29
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, a number of factors may affect our business and
prospects. These factors include but are not limited to the following, which you should consider carefully in evaluating our
business and prospects. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and
growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
Summary
• We are dependent on the success of larsucosterol and the path to regulatory approval is uncertain; we cannot be
•
certain that it will receive regulatory approval or be commercialized
The FDA or other regulatory agencies may require more information or clinical studies for our product candidates, and
our product candidates may never be approved
• We will require, and may have difficulty or be unsuccessful in raising needed capital in the future to continue to
operate as a going concern
• We contract with third parties for the manufacture of larsucosterol and expect to continue to do so for any required
additional clinical trials as well as the commercialization of larsucosterol. Our reliance on third parties increases the risk
that submissions for regulatory approval of larsucosterol may be delayed or that we will not have sufficient quantities
of larsucosterol available at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development and
commercialization efforts of larsucosterol
Safety data and indications of activity from completed Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of larsucosterol may not predict
safety, activity or therapeutic efficacy in future trials
Future clinical trials for larsucosterol may be delayed and may not demonstrate efficacy or safety
The FDA’s Fast Track Designation of larsucosterol may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or
approval
Open-label trials of larsucosterol in MASH and AH have inherent limitations
•
• We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the
•
•
•
•
development and commercialization of our product candidates
Key components of larsucosterol are provided by a limited number of suppliers, and supply shortages or loss of these
suppliers could result in delays or interruptions in supply or increased costs
• Macroeconomic uncertainties have in the past impacted and may continue to adversely impact our business, including
posing challenges to conducting clinical trials
• We have a significant amount of debt. Compliance with repayment obligations and other covenants may be difficult;
failure to fulfill our obligations may cause the repayment obligations to accelerate
•
• We do not control the commercialization of POSIMIR, PERSERIS or Methydur
•
For certain of our product candidates, we depend to a large extent on third-party collaborators, and we have limited or
no control over their development, sales, distribution, disclosure, regulatory strategy or potential commercialization
Our business strategy includes relying on third parties to support development, clinical trials, manufacturing and
commercialization of product candidates
Cancellation of third-party collaborations may adversely affect potential economic benefits
Our cash flows are likely to differ from our reported revenues and earnings
Failure to comply with governmental regulations could materially harm our business
•
•
•
• We have a history of operating losses, expect to continue to have losses and may never achieve or maintain
profitability and we may not successfully manage our Company through varying business cycles
• We depend upon key personnel who may terminate their employment with us at any time, and we may not be able to
attract and retain sufficient qualified personnel on a timely basis, if at all
29
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Cyber-attacks or other failures in telecommunications or information technology systems could result in information
theft, data corruption and significant disruption of our business operations
Our business involves environmental risks and risks related to handling regulated substances
As a non-accelerated filer, we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act and, consequently, some investors may find our common stock less attractive
If we are unable to protect, maintain or enforce our intellectual property rights or secure rights to third-party
intellectual property, or if our intellectual property rights are inadequate to protect our technology and product
candidates, our competitive position could be harmed, we may lose valuable assets, lose market share or incur costly
litigation or our third-party collaborators may choose to terminate their agreements with us
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, the value of our technology could be materially
adversely affected and our business would be harmed
The markets for our pharmaceutical products, product candidates and for our ALZET product line are rapidly changing
and competitive, and new products or technologies developed by others could impair our ability to establish, maintain
or grow our business and remain competitive
Our relationships with physicians, patients and third-party payers are subject to anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, privacy
and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual
damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings
• We could be exposed to significant product liability claims and we are subject to healthcare laws and regulations, which
could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages and reputational harm
Healthcare reform measures could hinder or prevent our product candidates’ commercial success
•
• Market acceptance of, and market opportunity for, our products or product candidates is uncertain, and failure to
achieve market acceptance or adequate reimbursement from third-party payers will delay our ability to generate or
grow revenues
Inability to train physicians to use our products may prevent market acceptance of our products
Our stock price has in the past and may in the future not meet the minimum bid price for continued listing on Nasdaq
Our operating history makes evaluating our stock difficult and the price of our stock may be volatile
Investors may experience substantial dilution of their investment
Our ability to use net operating losses and other tax attributes is uncertain and may be limited
•
•
•
•
•
• We have broad discretion over the use of our cash and investments, which may not always yield a favorable return
•
•
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law could discourage an acquisition of us
Having Delaware as the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders could limit our
stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes
Because our Company is a “smaller reporting company,” we may take advantage of certain scaled disclosures
available to us, resulting in holders of our securities receiving less Company information than they would receive from
a public company that is not a smaller reporting company
•
Risks Related To Our Business
We are dependent on the success of larsucosterol and the path to regulatory approval is uncertain; we cannot be certain that
it will receive regulatory approval or be commercialized
30
Our business depends substantially on the successful development of larsucosterol, which has completed multiple clinical
trials, including a Phase 2b clinical trial (AHFIRM) in patients with severe AH, topline results of which were announced in
November 2023. The AHFIRM trial did not achieve the primary endpoint of a statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality
or liver transplant for each dose of larsucosterol versus placebo. Accordingly, future clinical trials may be required to establish
clinically and statistically significant proof of efficacy, and sufficient evidence of safety to support regulatory approval. We are
communicating with the FDA about the next steps for the development of larsucosterol for AH, including the size and design of
the Phase 3 clinical trial, the specific primary and secondary endpoints for the clinical trial, inclusion and exclusion criteria,
duration of follow up, size of the safety databases, statistical analysis plans and other matters. There is no assurance that future
clinical trials will establish efficacy of larsucosterol to treat AH or will not result in unanticipated side effects. If larsucosterol fails
to demonstrate safety or efficacy at any time or during any phase of development, we would experience potentially significant
delays in, or be required to abandon development of larsucosterol, which would materially harm our business.
Larsucosterol may not be eligible to receive regulatory approval from the FDA or other regulatory agencies and begin
commercialization for a number of years, if ever. This uncertainty may make it difficult to predict the timing or expense required
to obtain regulatory approval for larsucosterol. If we are unable to reach an agreement with the FDA or other regulatory agencies
regarding the development of larsucosterol, including the trial design for a Phase 3 clinical trial in AH for larsucosterol’s clinical
development, we may curtail, limit or discontinue our development activities for this product candidate. Even if we ultimately
receive regulatory approval for larsucosterol, we or our potential future partners, if any, may be unable to commercialize it
successfully for a variety of reasons. These include, for example, the future availability of alternative, potentially superior or less
expensive treatments, lack of cost-effectiveness, the lack of favorable access and/or commercial pricing, the cost or technical
challenges of manufacturing the product on a commercial scale and competition with other treatments. The success of
larsucosterol may also be limited by the prevalence and severity of any adverse side effects, including mortality.
The FDA or other regulatory agencies may require more information or clinical studies for our product candidates, and our
product candidates may never be approved
The AHFIRM trial did not achieve the primary endpoint of a statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality or liver
transplant for each dose of larsucosterol versus placebo. The failure to adequately demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of
larsucosterol to the satisfaction of the FDA and other regulatory agencies will result in delays to the regulatory approval or non-
approvability of larsucosterol. Future clinical trials may not demonstrate the sufficient levels of safety and efficacy necessary to
obtain the requisite regulatory approvals for larsucosterol or may require such significant numbers of patients or additional costs
to make it impractical to satisfy the regulatory agency’s requirements, and thus larsucosterol may not be approved for
marketing. During the review process, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may request additional information regarding the
efficacy or safety of larsucosterol and providing such additional information could require significant additional work and
expense, and take a significant amount of time, resulting in a material delay of approval or the failure to obtain approval or lead
our Company to abandon the development of larsucosterol. Additionally, the FDA, or other regulatory agencies, may also request
more information regarding the chemistry, manufacturing or controls related to larsucosterol, and answering such questions
could require significant additional work and expense, and take a significant amount of time, resulting in a material delay of
approval or the failure to obtain approval or abandonment of larsucosterol. Even if larsucosterol receives FDA or other regulatory
agency approval, the regulatory agency may require that we conduct additional clinical or non-clinical studies after such
approval, place limitations on the use of our products in applicable labels, require marketing under a Risk Evaluation and
Mitigation Strategy program, include
31
commercially unattractive language in the approved product label, delay approval to market our products or limit the indicated
use of our products, which may harm our business and results of operations.
We will require and may have difficulty or be unsuccessful in raising needed capital in the future to continue to operate as a
going concern
Our business currently does not generate sufficient revenues to meet our capital requirements and we do not expect that it
will do so in the near future. We have expended and will continue to expend substantial funds to conduct the research,
development, manufacturing and clinical testing of larsucosterol.
Presently, we do not have sufficient cash resources to meet our plans for the next twelve months from the issuance of the
financial statements included herein. Our recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows and need for additional capital
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, our independent registered public accounting
firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31,
2023. We will require additional financing to fund our operations or we will have to significantly curtail or discontinue our
operations to conserve our capital resources. Additional funds may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, and such
availability will depend on a number of factors, some of which are outside of our control, including general capital markets
conditions and investors’ view of our prospects and valuation. Further, investors’ perception of our ability to continue as a going
concern may make it more difficult for us to obtain financing, or necessitate that we obtain financing on terms that are more
favorable to investors, and could result in the loss of confidence by investors, suppliers and employees. Our continued operations
are contingent on our ability to raise additional capital or license or otherwise monetize our assets. If we do not acquire sufficient
additional funding or alternative sources of capital to meet our working capital needs, we will have to substantially curtail or
discontinue our operations, resulting in delays in the development of larsucosterol and in generating revenue.
Our actual capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
continued progress and cost of our research and development programs;
progress with preclinical studies and clinical trials;
the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals, if any;
costs involved in establishing manufacturing capabilities for pre-clinical, non-clinical, clinical and commercial quantities
of our product candidates;
success in entering into collaboration agreements and achieving milestones under such agreements;
regulatory actions with respect to our products and product candidates;
costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing intellectual property rights;
costs of developing sales, marketing and distribution channels and our ability and that of our collaborators to sell our
products, products we have a financial interest in and, eventually, product candidates;
competing technological and market developments;
• market acceptance of our products, products we have a financial interest in and, eventually, product candidates;
•
any failure to comply with the covenants in our debt instruments that results in acceleration of repayment obligations;
32
•
•
costs for recruiting and retaining employees and consultants; and
unexpected legal, accounting and other costs and liabilities related to our business.
We may consume available resources more rapidly than currently anticipated, resulting in the need for additional funding.
For example, we do not currently have sufficient funding to complete a Phase 3 trial of larsucosterol, if required by the FDA. We
may seek to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings, convertible debt financings, collaborative arrangements
with corporate collaborators or other sources, which, in each case, may be dilutive to existing stockholders and may cause the
price of our common stock to decline. In addition, in the event that additional funds are obtained through arrangements with
collaborators or other sources, we may have to relinquish rights to some of our technologies, products or product candidates that
we would otherwise seek to develop or commercialize ourselves.
We contract with third parties for the manufacture of larsucosterol and expect to continue to do so for any required additional
clinical trials as well as the commercialization of larsucosterol. Our reliance on third parties increases the risk that submissions
for regulatory approval of larsucosterol may be delayed or that we will not have sufficient quantities of larsucosterol available
at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development and commercialization efforts of larsucosterol
We currently rely on third-party contractors to manufacture, package, label and distribute clinical supplies of injectable
larsucosterol, and we expect to establish supply agreements for commercial quantities of larsucosterol following approval for
marketing by applicable regulatory authorities. We also expect to rely on third-party contractors to manufacture larsucosterol for
use in future clinical trials. As of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our third-party manufacturer has not
established a final process for the commercial supply of injectable larsucosterol and neither we nor our third-party manufacturer
have completed stability testing required to submit and obtain regulatory approval for the use of larsucosterol in the treatment of
AH. Reliance on third-party contractors entails risks including, but not limited to:
•
•
•
our inability to identify and negotiate manufacturing and supply agreements with suitable manufacturers;
delays in the development of manufacturing process technologies and stability testing;
our inability to control manufacturing process development and its timing;
• manufacturing delays if our third-party contractors give greater priority to the supply of other products over
larsucosterol or otherwise do not satisfactorily perform according to the terms of our agreements with such
contractors;
•
•
•
•
•
•
possible terminations or nonrenewals of agreements by our third-party contractors at a time that is costly or
inconvenient for us;
possible breaches by third-party contractors of our agreements with such contractors;
failures by third-party contractors to comply with applicable regulatory requirements;
possible mislabeling of clinical supplies, which could result in the supply of incorrect dose amounts or the improper
identification of the active drug and/or placebo;
the possibility that clinical supplies will not be delivered to clinical sites on time, leading to clinical trial interruptions, or
that drug supplies will not be distributed to commercial vendors in a timely manner, resulting in lost sales; or
possible misappropriations of our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and know-how.
33
Additionally, we may incur delays in the regulatory submissions or approval of larsucosterol due to manufacturing process
development and stability testing, or from the need to identify or qualify alternative third-party manufacturers. Our current and
anticipated future dependence upon third parties for the manufacturing of larsucosterol may adversely affect our future profit
margins and our ability to commercialize any of our products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.
Safety data and indications of activity from completed Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of larsucosterol may not predict safety,
activity or therapeutic efficacy in future trials
Safety data and indications of activity from completed Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of larsucosterol, or from geographic or
other subset analyses of the AHFIRM trial, may ultimately not be correlated with treatment or improvement in the associated
disease, and there is a risk that larsucosterol may not demonstrate therapeutic efficacy in subsequent placebo-controlled trials.
For example, the AHFIRM trial did not achieve the primary endpoint of a statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality or
liver transplant for each dose of larsucosterol versus placebo. The failure of larsucosterol to show efficacy in one indication may
negatively affect its perceived value in other indications, and the emergence of safety signals in ongoing or future clinical trials
would significantly harm our business.
From time to time, we may publicly disclose preliminary or “topline” data from our clinical trials, which is based on a
preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a
more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and
conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate
all data. As a result, the topline results that we report, including the preliminary Phase 2b clinical data for AHFIRM reported in
November 2023, may differ from, and may not be indicative of, future results of the same clinical trials, or different conclusions
or considerations may qualify such topline results once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also
remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being different from the preliminary data we
previously published. As a result, topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available and negative
differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could materially adversely affect the prospects of any product
candidate that is impacted by such data updates.
Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations,
conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the
particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate or product and the value of our
company in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is
typically a summary of extensive information, and others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise
appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed
significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product, product
candidate or our business. If the topline data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory
authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates
may be harmed.
Future clinical trials for larsucosterol may be delayed and may not demonstrate efficacy or safety
Future trials of larsucosterol in patients with AH are subject to potential delays for several reasons, including without
limitation:
•
•
the FDA or other regulatory agencies disagreeing as to the design or implementation of our clinical trials;
failure to agree with the FDA or other regulatory agencies regarding the trial design, including without limitation
inclusion and exclusion criteria or primary and secondary endpoints;
34
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
failure to reach, or delays in reaching, an agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research
organizations ("CROs"), and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary
significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
failure to obtain institutional review board ("IRB") approval at each site;
delays, suspension, or termination of clinical trials by the IRB responsible for overseeing the trial at a particular trial
site;
slower than expected rates of recruitment of patients or failure to recruit a sufficient number of patients;
delays in manufacturing or delivery of drug product to clinical trial sites;
patients dropping out of the trial after enrollment or withdrawing consent;
clinical sites deviating from trial protocol, dropping out of a trial, or failing to comply with regulatory requirements;
government, IRB, or other regulatory delays or “clinical holds” requiring suspension or termination of the trials;
COVID-19, flu or other diseases having an adverse effect on patients’ willingness to participate in a trial;
protocol amendments; and
the availability of capital to conduct such future trials.
There can also be no assurance that biological activity demonstrated in previous animal disease models or earlier clinical
trials of larsucosterol will also be seen in future clinical trials, or that any clinically relevant biological activity will be observed, or
that enrollment rates in future trials will be favorable or that these additional trials will not identify safety issues. Failure of future
trials to achieve desired results in their anticipated timeframe could negatively impact our business and ability to raise additional
capital.
Moreover, success in future research, preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will
be successful, and we cannot be sure that the results of later clinical trials will replicate the results of prior clinical trials and non-
clinical testing. Any future clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that our potential drug candidates are safe for humans
and effective for indicated uses. This failure would cause us to abandon a drug candidate and may delay development of other
potential drug candidates. Any delay in, or termination of, future non-clinical testing or clinical trials will delay the filing of any
future investigational new drug application ("IND") and new drug application ("NDA") with the FDA or the equivalent applications
with pharmaceutical regulatory authorities outside the United States and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize any potential
drugs and generate product revenues. The results of AHFIRM, including the topline data from our AHFIRM Phase 2b trial, may not
be indicative of future results.
The FDA’s Fast Track Designation of larsucosterol may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval
The FDA grants Fast Track Designation to therapies that are considered capable of addressing unmet medical needs and
possess the potential to treat serious or life-threatening disease conditions in order to facilitate its development and expedite the
review procedure. Even though larsucosterol has received Fast Track Designation for the treatment of AH, we may not experience
a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures, or receive FDA approval at all, in
that indication or any other. A Fast Track Designation does not change the standards for approval. The
35
FDA may also withdraw Fast Track Designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical
development program.
In addition, the statutes and regulations that define the timelines and criteria for approval of drugs and biologics are
subject to change by the U.S. Congress and the responsible administrative agencies. For example, the Prescription Drug User Fee
Act (“PDUFA”) authorizes the FDA to collect fees and use them for the review of human drug applications and defines the review
time targets for such applications. The current legislative authority for PDUFA will expire in September 2027. New legislation will
then be required for the FDA to continue collecting prescription drug user fees in future fiscal years and for manufacturers to
have clarity regarding the time the FDA will spend in review before granting regulatory approval. If PDUFA reauthorization is not
completed in the future, the review and approval times for new drugs like larsucosterol could be significantly longer than
currently expected, which could delay potential marketing approval and launch.
Open-label trials of larsucosterol in MASH and AH have inherent limitations
Certain previously completed MASH and AH trials of larsucosterol were open-label trials with no control groups. Open label
trials have inherent risk of bias given that the patients and physicians know that the patients received active study drug, which
can lead to placebo effects. Trials without control groups have an inherent risk in that the comparisons used to determine the
study drug’s effect and side effect profile are based on comparisons with baseline (pre-treatment) levels (for blood chemistry and
biomarker endpoints) and/or with historical controls, which may not have been conducted under similar enough conditions to
make accurate comparisons and/or draw accurate conclusions from those comparisons. Additionally, larger placebo-controlled
clinical trials are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of larsucosterol to treat any indication, including AH and MASH.
There can be no assurance that ongoing or future studies will demonstrate the safety or efficacy of larsucosterol in a statistically
significant or clinically meaningful manner.
We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and
commercialization of our product candidates
We may experience delays in completing our preclinical studies and initiating or completing clinical trials, and we may
experience numerous unfavorable events during, or as a result of, any future clinical trials that we may conduct that could delay
or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:
•
•
•
•
•
regulators, institutional review boards ("IRBs"), or ethics committees may not authorize us or our investigators to
commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at one or more prospective trial sites;
we may experience delays in reaching, or fail to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with prospective trial sites and
prospective CROs, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among
different CROs and trial sites. We may be forced to accept unfavorable contract provisions in such agreements based
on country, territory or local laws or requirements of institutions or IRBs where important clinical investigators practice;
clinical trials of our product candidates have in the past and may in the future produce negative or inconclusive results,
clinical trial subjects receiving placebo or placebo may experience better than expected outcomes, and we may decide,
or regulators may require us, to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials or we may decide to abandon
product development programs;
clinical trial sites or clinical investigators may not comply with the study protocol or applicable laws;
the number of patients required for clinical trials of our product candidates may be larger than we anticipate,
enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate, or
36
•
•
•
•
•
participants may drop out of these clinical trials or fail to return for post-treatment follow-up at a higher rate than we
anticipate;
our third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us
in a timely manner, or at all, or may deviate from the clinical trial protocol or drop out of the trial, which may require
that we add new clinical trial sites or investigators;
we may elect to, or regulators or IRBs or ethics committees may require us or our investigators to, suspend or
terminate clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that
the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;
the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate;
the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of our product
candidates may be insufficient or inadequate; and
our product candidates may have undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics, causing us or our
investigators, regulators or IRBs or ethics committees to suspend or terminate the trials, or reports may arise from
preclinical or clinical testing of other therapies that raise safety or efficacy concerns about our product candidates.
We could encounter delays if a clinical trial is delayed, suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions at
which such trials are being conducted, by the Data Safety Monitoring Board for such trial or by the FDA or other regulatory
authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination or clinical hold due to a number of factors, including
failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical
trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, changes in clinical trial design, safety issues or adverse
side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a product, or changes in governmental regulations or administrative
actions. We may also delay, suspend or terminate a clinical trial due to a lack of adequate funding to commence or continue the
clinical trial. Many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also
ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. Further, the FDA may disagree with our clinical trial
design and our interpretation of data from clinical trials, or may change the requirements for approval even after it has reviewed
and commented on the design for our clinical trials.
Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or regulatory approvals. We do not
know whether any of our future clinical trials will begin as planned, or whether any of our current or future clinical trials will need
to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Significant preclinical study or clinical trial delays, also could shorten
any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to
bring products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm
our business and results of operations. Any delays in our ongoing or future preclinical or clinical development programs may
harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.
Key components of larsucosterol are provided by a limited number of suppliers, and supply shortages or loss of these suppliers
could result in delays or interruptions in supply or increased costs
We purchase larsucosterol from a third-party supplier and we currently have a third-party sole manufacturer for GMP
supplies of larsucosterol. The third party supplier is our sole manufacturer of the larsucosterol drug substance and the third party
manufacturer is our sole source for the drug product required for development and commercialization of our larsucosterol drug
candidate.
The reliance on a sole or limited number of manufacturers and suppliers could result in:
37
•
•
•
an inability to obtain an adequate supply of larsucosterol;
delays associated with finding and contracting with a new supplier/manufacturer (if we can find one capable of
replacing the old supplier and negotiate commercially reasonable terms) and then transferring the know-how and
technology required to perform the services to the new supplier; and
reduced control over pricing, quality and delivery time.
There can be no assurance that we will receive sufficient quantities of larsucosterol to commence and conduct the non-
clinical trials, clinical trials and CMC activities we are planning, and delays in supply or manufacturing could delay development of
larsucosterol. In addition, if additional third parties in our supply chain are adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from
macroeconomic events, including staffing shortages, raw material shortages, production slowdowns and/or disruptions in delivery
systems, our supply chain may be disrupted in other ways, further limiting our ability to manufacture our product candidates for
our clinical trials and conduct our research and development operations.
We have supply agreements in place for certain components of our products and product candidates, but do not have in
place long term supply agreements with respect to all of the components of any of our products or product candidates. Therefore,
the supply of a particular component could be terminated without our consent at any time without penalty to the supplier. In
addition, we may not be able to procure required components or drugs from third-party suppliers at a commercially reasonable
quantity, quality, cost and timing. In addition, certain of our suppliers may encounter delays in providing their services. Any
interruption in the supply of single source components (including active pharmaceutical ingredients, excipients, or components
like vials, stoppers, filters and the like), products or product candidates, could cause us to seek alternative sources of supply or
attempt to manufacture these items internally if feasible. Furthermore, in some cases, we are relying on our third-party
collaborators to procure supply of necessary components. If the supply of any components for our products or product candidates
is interrupted, components from alternative suppliers may not be available in sufficient volumes or at acceptable quality levels
within required timeframes, if at all, to meet our needs or those of our third-party collaborators. This could delay our ability to
obtain commercial product supplies or complete development and obtain approval for commercialization and marketing of our
product candidates, causing us to lose sales, incur additional costs, delay new product introductions and could harm our
reputation and make access to capital more difficult, expensive or impossible. Supply chain disruptions have affected and are
likely to continue to affect the manufacturing and shipment of goods globally. Any delay in production or delivery of the
components and drug substances used in our products or product candidates for any reason, could adversely impact our business
and hinder our growth.
Macroeconomic uncertainties have in the past impacted and may continue to adversely impact our business, including posing
challenges to conducting clinical trials
Global economic and business activities continue to face widespread macroeconomic uncertainties, including labor
shortages and supply chain disruptions, inflation and monetary supply shifts, as well as recession risks, which may continue for
an extended period, which may have an adverse impact on the economies and financial markets of many countries, resulting in a
severe and prolonged global economic downturn that could continue to affect demand for our ALZET product line and could have
an adverse impact on our business operations and financial condition. Further, such macroeconomic uncertainties may also
adversely impact our ability to raise additional capital to provide sufficient funding to continue our product development efforts,
including clinical trials, which would make it more difficult for companies such as ours to access capital.
Additionally, inflation has the potential to adversely affect our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of
operations by increasing our overall cost structure. The existence of inflation in the economy has resulted in, and may continue to
result in, higher interest rates and capital costs, supply
38
shortages, increased costs of labor, increased manufacturing costs and clinical trial costs, weakening exchange rates and other
similar effects. As a result of inflation, we have experienced and may continue to experience cost increases.
The extent to which such macroeconomic uncertainties impact our operations will depend on future developments, which
are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence. As a result, there have been and may continue to be longer lead
times required for acquiring components and supplies used in manufacturing of larsucosterol, and there have been periods of
reduced demand for our ALZET products, which are used in scientific and pre-clinical research. We may continue to experience
disruptions that could severely impact our business, preclinical studies and clinical trials including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical trials;
delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting clinical site investigators and clinical site
staff;
diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals serving as
our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials;
interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site data monitoring, due to limitations on travel or safety
precautions imposed or recommended by federal, state or local governments, employers and others or interruption of
clinical trial subject visits and study procedures, which may impact the integrity of subject data and clinical study
endpoints, the ability to collect, ship and analyze biological samples from clinical trial patients due to concerns about
potential contamination of samples and/or exposure of clinical staff to patients with certain diseases;
interruption or delays in the operations of the FDA or other regulatory authorities, which may impact review and
approval timelines;
disruption or delays in manufacturing of clinical and commercial supplies due to issues experienced by our contract
manufacturing organizations and/or shortages and delays in obtaining raw materials and supplies required in the
manufacturing processes;
interruption of or delays in receiving supplies of our products and product candidates from our contract manufacturing
organizations due to staffing shortages, production slowdowns or stoppages, prioritization of pandemic-related
activities over ours and disruptions in delivery systems;
interruptions in preclinical studies due to restricted or limited operations at laboratory facilities;
limitations on employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our preclinical studies, clinical
trials, and manufacturing activities including because of sickness of employees or their families or the desire of
employees to avoid contact with groups of people; and
• material delays and complications with respect to our research and development programs.
We have a significant amount of debt. Compliance with repayment obligations and other covenants may be difficult, and
failure to fulfill our obligations under the applicable loan agreements may cause our repayment obligations to accelerate
In July 2016, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “Loan Agreement”) with Oxford Finance LLC
("Oxford Finance"), pursuant to which Oxford Finance provided a $20 million secured single-draw term loan to us with an initial
maturity date of August 1, 2020. The term loan was fully drawn at close and the proceeds were used for working capital and
general business requirements.
39
Following five amendments, we made interest only payments under the amended Loan Agreement until June 1, 2023, followed by
consecutive monthly payments of principal and interest in arrears continuing through September 1, 2025, the final maturity date
of the term loan. The Loan Agreement provides for a floating interest rate (7.95% initially and 12.75% as of December 31, 2023)
based on an index rate plus a spread and an additional payment equal to 10% of the principal amount of the term loan, which is
due when the term loan becomes due or upon the prepayment of the facility. Any increases in prevailing interest rates could
increase our expenses under the Loan Agreement. If we elect to prepay the term loan, there is also a prepayment fee between
0.75% and 2.5% of the principal amount of the term loan depending on the timing of prepayment. Our debt repayment
obligations under the Loan Agreement may prove a burden to our Company as they become due, particularly following the
expiration of the interest-only period. Increased payment requirements that started after June 2023 increase our cash
expenditures and may eventually require us to raise additional capital or renegotiate or refinance the Loan Agreement. There can
be no assurance that additional capital will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that we would be able to successfully
renegotiate or refinance the Loan Agreement on acceptable terms, if at all.
The Loan Agreement contains customary events of default, including, among other things, our failure to fulfill certain of our
obligations under the Loan Agreement and the occurrence of a material adverse change in our business, operations or condition
(financial or otherwise), a material impairment of the prospect of repayment of any portion of the term loan, the failure to deliver
an unqualified audit report and board approved financial projections within time periods set forth in the Loan Agreement, or a
material impairment in the perfection or priority of lender’s lien in the collateral or in the value of such collateral. In the event of
default by us under the Loan Agreement, the lender would be entitled to exercise its remedies thereunder, including the right to
accelerate the debt, upon which we may be required to repay all amounts then outstanding under the Loan Agreement, which
could harm our business, operations and financial condition.
In addition, the term loan is secured by substantially all of our assets, except that the collateral does not include any equity
interests in our Company, any intellectual property (including all licensing, collaboration and similar agreements relating thereto),
and certain other excluded assets. The Loan Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by us,
which covenants limit our ability to convey, sell, lease, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of certain of our assets; engage in
any business other than the businesses currently engaged in by us or reasonably related thereto; liquidate or dissolve; make
certain management changes; undergo certain change of control events; create, incur, assume, or be liable with respect to
certain indebtedness; grant certain liens; pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments; make certain investments;
make payments on any subordinated debt; and enter into transactions with any of our affiliates outside of the ordinary course of
business or permit our subsidiaries to do the same. Complying with these covenants may make it more difficult for us to
successfully execute our business strategy.
40
We do not control the commercialization of POSIMIR, PERSERIS or Methydur
We rely on Innocoll for the commercialization of POSIMIR. The current approved labeling for POSIMIR is limited, and Innocoll
is responsible for completing post-marketing non-clinical studies and any additional studies required by the FDA, and negative
results from these studies could adversely affect commercialization of POSIMIR. Innocoll is also responsible for manufacturing
POSIMIR. If Innocoll does not successfully grow POSIMIR sales, the royalty payments we receive under our agreement with them
will be limited and we may not receive additional milestone payments from them. Additionally, we rely on Indivior for the
commercialization of PERSERIS. There can be no assurance that PERSERIS sales will maintain current levels or grow materially. If
Indivior does not successfully grow PERSERIS sales, future earn-out payments we receive under our agreement with them will be
limited. Both POSIMIR and PERSERIS are subject to boxed warnings that may make them more difficult to commercialize. Further,
we rely on Orient Pharma for the commercialization of Methydur. If Orient Pharma does not successfully grow Methydur sales, the
royalty payments we receive under our agreement with them will be limited. The sales of each of these products may be
negatively impacted by challenging macroeconomic conditions.
For certain of our product candidates, we depend to a large extent on third-party collaborators, and we have limited or no
control over their development, sales, distribution and disclosure for those product candidates
Our performance for certain of our product candidates depends to a large extent on the ability of our third-party
collaborators to successfully develop and obtain regulatory approvals. We have entered into agreements with Innocoll, Indivior
and Orient Pharma under which we granted such third parties the right to develop, apply for regulatory approval for, market,
promote or distribute certain products or product candidates, subject to payments to us in the form of product royalties, earn-out
and other payments. We have limited or no control over the expertise or resources that any collaborator may devote to the
development, clinical trial strategy, regulatory approval, marketing or sale of these product candidates, or the timing of their
activities. Any of our present or future collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected. These collaborators may
breach or terminate their agreement with us or otherwise fail to conduct their collaborative activities successfully and in a timely
manner. Enforcing any of these agreements in the event of a breach by the other party could require the expenditure of
significant resources and consume a significant amount of management time and attention. Our collaborators may also conduct
their activities in a manner that is different from the manner we would recommend or would have chosen had we been
developing such product candidates ourselves. Further, our collaborators may elect not to develop or commercialize product
candidates arising out of our collaborative arrangements or not devote sufficient resources to the development, clinical trials,
regulatory approval, manufacture, marketing or sale of these product candidates. If any of these events occur, we may not
recognize revenue from the commercialization of our product candidates based on such collaborations. In addition, these third
parties may have similar or competitive products to the ones which are the subject of their collaborations with us, or relationships
with our competitors, which may reduce their interest in developing or selling our products or product candidates. We may not be
able to control public disclosures made by some of our third-party collaborators, which could negatively impact our stock price.
Our business strategy includes relying on third parties to support development, clinical testing, manufacturing and
commercialization of our products and product candidates.
Our current business strategy includes reliance on third-party CROs, consultants, service providers and suppliers to provide
critical services to support development, clinical testing, and manufacturing of our products and product candidates, including,
but not limited to larsucosterol and others. For example, we currently depend on third-party vendors to manage and monitor
most of our clinical trials. We rely on third parties to manufacture or perform manufacturing steps relating to our products,
product candidates and components. We anticipate that we will continue to rely on these and other third-party contractors to
41
support development, clinical testing, and manufacturing of our products and product candidates. Third parties may not execute
their responsibilities and tasks competently in compliance with their contractual obligations to us, applicable laws and regulations
or in a timely or cost-effective fashion. Failure of these contractors to provide the required services in a competent or timely
manner or on reasonable commercial terms could materially delay the development and approval of our product candidates or
commercialization of our products, increase our expenses and materially harm our business, financial condition, results of
operations and access to capital.
Cancellation of third-party collaborations may adversely affect potential economic benefits
Third-party collaboration agreements typically allow the third party to terminate the agreement (or a specific program
within an agreement) at will by providing notice. Termination can result from failure of the collaboration to achieve anticipated
milestones, from changes in strategy of the other party or for other reasons. In these cases, the product rights revert to us or
certain rights of the partner to use our proprietary technology are terminated. If there have been payments under such
agreements that are being recognized over time, termination of such agreements (or programs) can lead to a near-term increase
in our reported revenues resulting from the immediate recognition of the balance of such payments. Termination deprives us of
potential future economic benefits under such agreements, and may make it more difficult, unattractive or impossible to enter
into agreements with other third parties for use of the assets and/or technologies that were subject to the terminated agreement.
For example, termination of our agreements with Innocoll or Orient Pharma could have negative effects on our Company.
Our cash flows are likely to differ from our reported revenues and earnings
Our revenues and earnings may differ from our cash flows from revenue-generating activities. Upfront payments received
upon execution of collaborative agreements may be recorded as deferred revenue, in which case they would be recognized over
the period of performance for the related performance obligations with the third-party collaborator pursuant to the applicable
agreement. The period of performance obligations may also be revised on a prospective basis. Assumptions related to revenue
recognition for performance obligations provided over time are reviewed in each accounting period and changes are recorded in
the current period. In certain circumstances, changes in assumptions related to the measure of progress for a performance
obligation performed over time could result in negative revenue or the acceleration of revenue for an accounting period.
Failure to comply with governmental regulations could materially harm our business
Developing, manufacturing, marketing or promoting a drug is subject to very strict regulations and controls. Furthermore,
clearance or approval may entail ongoing requirements for post-marketing studies or surveillance. The manufacture and
marketing of drugs are subject to continuing FDA and foreign regulatory review and requirements that we update our regulatory
filings. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, manufacturer or facility, or our failure to update
regulatory files, may result in restrictions, including withdrawal of the product from the market. Any of the following or other
similar events, if they were to occur, could delay or preclude us from further developing, marketing or realizing full commercial
value of our products or product candidates, which in turn would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations:
•
•
•
•
failure to obtain or maintain requisite governmental approvals;
failure to meet GMP, good laboratory practice and/or other governmental requirements for drug development;
failure to obtain approvals for commercially valuable intended uses of our products and product candidates; or
FDA required product withdrawals, clinical holds or warnings arising from identification of serious adverse side effects
in our products and product candidates.
42
Manufacturers of drugs must comply with the applicable FDA GMP regulations, which include production design controls,
testing, quality control and quality assurance requirements as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and
documentation. Compliance with current GMP regulations is difficult and costly. Manufacturing facilities are subject to ongoing
periodic inspection by the FDA and corresponding state and in some cases, foreign agencies, including unannounced inspections,
and must be licensed before they can be used for the commercial manufacture of our products and product candidates. We
and/or our present or future suppliers and distributors may be unable to comply with the applicable GMP regulations and other
FDA and/or foreign regulatory requirements. If we, our third-party collaborators or our respective suppliers do not achieve
compliance for our products or product candidates we or they manufacture, the FDA or foreign equivalents may refuse or
withdraw marketing clearance or approvals, put our or our partner’s clinical trial on hold, withdraw or reject an investigational
NDA or require product recall, which may cause interruptions or delays in the development, manufacture and sale of our products
and product candidates.
We have a history of operating losses, expect to continue to have losses and may never achieve or maintain profitability and
we may not successfully manage our Company through varying business cycles
We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception in 1998 and, as of December 31, 2023, had an
accumulated deficit of approximately $589.0 million. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses over the next
several years as we continue to incur significant costs for research and development, clinical trials, manufacturing, sales, and
general and administrative functions. Our ability to achieve profitability depends upon our ability, alone or with others, to
successfully complete the development of our proposed product candidates, obtain the required regulatory clearances,
manufacture and market our proposed product candidates and successfully commercialize our approved products. Development
of pharmaceutical product candidates is costly and requires significant investment. In addition, we may choose to license from
third parties either rights to particular drugs or other appropriate technology and/or intellectual property rights for use in our
products and product candidates. The license fees as well as the operating costs of using or developing these technologies or
rights would increase the costs of our products and product candidates as well as our operating costs generally.
Our revenues over the last two years are from the ALZET product line, from earn-out payments from Indivior related to
sales of PERSERIS, from certain excipient sales, from royalty payments from Orient Pharma related to sales of Methydur in
Taiwan, from payments under collaborative research and development agreements with third parties and from milestones and
royalties from Innocoll related to POSIMIR. We do not expect that our revenues will exceed our operating expenses in the near
future. We do not anticipate meaningful revenues to derive from the commercialization and marketing of our products and
product candidates in the near future, do not expect to receive additional milestone payments in the near term or meaningful
royalties from POSIMIR until the product achieves meaningful sales (if ever) and therefore do not expect to generate sufficient
revenues to cover expenses or achieve profitability in the near future.
43
Our success will depend on properly sizing our Company through growth and contraction cycles caused in part by changing
business conditions, which places a significant strain on our management and on our administrative, operational and financial
resources. For example, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, from 2020 to 2022, we required most of our personnel,
including all of our administrative employees, to work remotely, restricted on-site staff to only mandatory personnel,
implemented social distancing on-site, and closed certain of our offices temporarily. While we have switched to a hybrid remote
model, our continued reliance on personnel working remotely makes us more susceptible to reduced productivity, disruptions,
delays, and other adverse impacts on our business. In addition, this model could increase our cyber security risk, create data
accessibility concerns, and make us more susceptible to communication disruptions, any of which could adversely impact our
business operations or delay necessary interactions with the FDA, manufacturing sites, research or clinical trial sites. To mitigate
similar future cycles, we may expand or contract our facilities, our operational, financial and management systems and our
personnel. If we are unable to manage growth and contractions effectively, our business would be harmed.
Changes in tax law could adversely affect our business and financial condition
The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state, and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the
legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive
application) could adversely affect us or holders of our common stock. Many such changes have been made in the past and
changes are likely to continue to occur in the future. For example, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the
“American Rescue Plan Act”, which included extenders to the refundable employee retention credit under the Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act and limitations to executive compensation effective for tax years beginning after
2026. Future changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, financial condition or results of
operations.
We may develop our own sales force and commercial group to market future products but we have limited sales and
marketing experience and may not be able to do so effectively
We have a small sales and marketing group focused on our ALZET product line. We may choose to develop our own sales
force and commercial group to market larsucosterol, if approved, or other products that we may develop in the future.
Developing a sales force and commercial group would require substantial expenditures and the hiring of qualified personnel. We
have limited sales and marketing experience, and may not be able to effectively recruit, train or retain sales and marketing
personnel. If we are not able to put in place an appropriate sales force and commercial group for our products in development
and provide that commercial team with sufficient financial and other resources, we may not be able to effectively launch or
commercialize these or any other products. We may not be able to effectively sell our products and product candidates, if
approved, and our failure to do so could limit or materially harm our business.
We and our third-party collaborators may not sell our product candidates effectively
We and our third-party collaborators (including Innocoll, Indivior and Orient Pharma) compete with many other companies
that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations. Our marketing and sales efforts and those of our
third-party collaborators may be unable to compete successfully against these other companies. We and our third-party
collaborators, where applicable, may be unable to establish a sufficient sales and marketing organization on a timely basis, if at
all. We and our third-party collaborators, where applicable, may be unable to engage qualified distributors. Even if engaged,
these collaborators and distributors may:
•
fail to adequately market our products or product candidates;
44
•
•
•
•
•
fail to satisfy financial or contractual obligations to us;
cease operations, terminate our collaboration or re-allocate resources away from our products or product candidates
with little or no notice to us;
offer, design, manufacture or promote competing product lines;
fail to maintain adequate inventory and thereby restrict use of our products or product candidates; or
build up inventory in excess of demand thereby limiting future purchases of our products or product candidates
resulting in significant quarter-to-quarter variability in our sales.
The failure by us or our third-party collaborators to effectively develop, gain regulatory approval for, sell, manufacture and
market our products and product candidates will hurt our business, prospects, financial results and may impact our access to
capital.
We depend upon key personnel who may terminate their employment with us at any time, and we may not be able to attract
and retain sufficient qualified personnel on a timely basis, if at all
Our success will depend to a significant degree upon the continued services of key management, technical and scientific
personnel. In addition, our success will depend on our ability to attract and retain other highly skilled personnel, particularly as
we develop and expand our Epigenetic Regulator Program. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and the process of
hiring and integrating such qualified personnel is often lengthy. The market for qualified personnel in the San Francisco Bay Area
is very competitive and we may be unable to recruit such personnel on a timely basis, if at all. Our management and other
employees may voluntarily terminate their employment with us at any time. The loss of the services of key personnel, or the
inability to attract and retain additional qualified personnel, could result in delays to product development or approval, loss of
sales and diversion of management resources as well as difficulties or inability to raise sufficient capital to fund our Company’s
operations.
Cyber-attacks or other failures in telecommunications or information technology systems could result in information theft, data
corruption and significant disruption of our business operations
We utilize information technology, systems and networks to process, transmit and store electronic information in
connection with our business activities. As use of digital technologies has increased, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks
and attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks, have increased in frequency and sophistication.
These threats pose a risk to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our
data, and may cause a disruption in our operations, harm our reputation, cause us to pay to retrieve our data if it becomes
infected or otherwise subject to ransomware, and increase our stock trading risk. There can be no assurance that we will be
successful in preventing cyber-attacks or successfully mitigating their effects. Similarly, there can be no assurance that our third-
party collaborators, distributors and other contractors and consultants will be successful in protecting our clinical and other data
that is stored on their systems. Any cyber-attack or destruction or loss of data could have a material adverse effect on our
business and prospects. In addition, we may suffer reputational harm or face litigation or adverse regulatory action as a result of
cyber-attacks or other data security breaches and may incur significant additional expense to implement further data protection
measures.
Our business involves environmental risks and risks related to handling regulated substances
In connection with our research and development activities and our manufacture of materials, products and product
candidates, we are subject to federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and policies governing the use, generation,
manufacture, storage, air emission, effluent discharge, handling and disposal of certain materials, biological specimens and
wastes. Although we believe that we have complied with the applicable laws, regulations and policies in all material respects and
have not been required to correct any material noncompliance, we may be required to incur significant costs to comply
45
with environmental and health and safety regulations in the future. Our research and development involves the use, generation
and disposal of hazardous materials, including but not limited to certain hazardous chemicals, solvents, agents and biohazardous
materials. Although we believe that our safety procedures for storing, handling and disposing of such materials comply with the
standards prescribed by state and federal regulations, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or
injury from these materials. We currently contract with third parties to dispose of these substances generated by us, and we rely
on these third parties to properly dispose of these substances in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If these third
parties do not properly dispose of these substances in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to
legal action by governmental agencies or private parties for improper disposal of these substances. The costs of defending such
actions and the potential liability resulting from such actions are often very large. In the event we are subject to such legal action
or we otherwise fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations governing the use, generation and disposal of hazardous
materials and chemicals, we could be held liable for any damages that result, and any such liability could exceed our resources.
As a non-accelerated filer, we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
and, consequently, some investors may find our common stock less attractive
We are a non-accelerated filer as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, and as such, are not required to provide an
auditor attestation of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, which is generally required for SEC
reporting companies under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Therefore, our internal controls over financial reporting will
not receive the level of review provided by the process relating to the auditor attestation included in annual reports of issuers
that are subject to the auditor attestation requirements. Because we are not required to have our auditors provide an attestation
of our management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, a material weakness in internal control may remain
undetected for a longer period. In addition, investors may find our common stock less attractive because we are not required to
comply with the auditor attestation requirements. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may
be a less active trading market for our common stock and the trading price for our common stock as well as our ability to raise
capital may be negatively affected.
Delays or difficulties in the enrollment of subjects in clinical trials may increase our overall development expenses and delay
clinical trial data and receipt of necessary regulatory approvals
Successful and timely completion of clinical trials will require that we enroll a sufficient number of subjects and/or patients
within a reasonable period of time. Enrollment, a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials, is affected by many factors
including the size and nature of the patient population, our ability to recruit clinical sites and the ability of clinical sites to
successfully recruit subjects to participate in clinical trials. Trials may be subject to delays as a result of patient enrollment taking
longer than anticipated or patient withdrawal. We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for larsucosterol if we are
unable to sign and maintain sufficient clinical sites, locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in
these trials as required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities or if we are unable to collect and analyze biological samples
required for trial endpoints. It is possible that the inclusion and exclusion criteria for patients to be enrolled in these trials may
make the trials more difficult to conduct or may significantly extend the time required for enrollment and the cost of these trials.
We cannot predict how successful we will be at enrolling patients in our clinical trials. Enrollment is affected by many
factors including:
•
•
the eligibility criteria for the trial in question;
the prevalence and incidence of the conditions being studied;
46
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
challenges with patient access, hospital prioritization, clinical trial staff availability, ability to collect, ship and analyze
patients’ biological samples, availability of personal protective equipment, swabs, reagents and other materials and
supplies;
the perceived risks and benefits of our product candidates;
clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the product candidate being studied in relation to
other available therapies, including any new drugs or therapeutic biologics that may be approved for the indications we
are investigating;
the efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;
competition for clinical sites and patients from other clinical trials;
the willingness of potential clinical trial patients to provide informed consent to participate in the trial;
the patient referral practices of physicians;
the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment; and
the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients.
Our inability to sign up and maintain sufficient clinical trial sites and/or enroll a sufficient number of patients for clinical
trials would result in significant delays and could require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Enrollment delays in
these clinical trials may result in increased development costs for our drug candidates or delays in regulatory filings and
approvals, which would cause the value of our Company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing.
Changes in tax law could adversely affect our business and financial condition
The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state, and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the
legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive
application) could adversely affect us or holders of our common stock. Many such changes have been made in the past and
changes are likely to continue to occur in the future. For example, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the
“American Rescue Plan Act”, which included extenders to the refundable employee retention credit under the Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act and limitations to executive compensation effective for tax years beginning after
2026. Future changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, financial condition or results of
operations.
We may develop our own sales force and commercial group to market future products but we have limited sales and
marketing experience and may not be able to do so effectively
We have a small sales and marketing group focused on our ALZET product line. We may choose to develop our own sales
force and commercial group to market larsucosterol, if approved, or other products that we may develop in the future.
Developing a sales force and commercial group would require substantial expenditures and the hiring of qualified personnel. We
have limited sales and marketing experience, and may not be able to effectively recruit, train or retain sales and marketing
personnel. If we are not able to put in place an appropriate sales force and commercial group for our products in development
and provide that commercial team with sufficient financial and other resources, we may not be able to effectively launch or
commercialize these or any other products. We may not be able to effectively sell our products and product candidates, if
approved, and our failure to do so could limit or materially harm our business.
We and our third-party collaborators may not sell our product candidates effectively
47
We and our third-party collaborators (including Innocoll, Indivior and Orient Pharma) compete with many other
companies that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations. Our marketing and sales efforts and
those of our third-party collaborators may be unable to compete successfully against these other companies. We and our
third-party collaborators, where applicable, may be unable to establish a sufficient sales and marketing organization on a
timely basis, if at all. We and our third-party collaborators, where applicable, may be unable to engage qualified distributors.
Even if engaged, these collaborators and distributors may:
•
•
•
•
•
•
fail to adequately market our products or product candidates;
fail to satisfy financial or contractual obligations to us;
cease operations, terminate our collaboration or re-allocate resources away from our products or product candidates
with little or no notice to us;
offer, design, manufacture or promote competing product lines;
fail to maintain adequate inventory and thereby restrict use of our products or product candidates; or
build up inventory in excess of demand thereby limiting future purchases of our products or product candidates
resulting in significant quarter-to-quarter variability in our sales.
The failure by us or our third-party collaborators to effectively develop, gain regulatory approval for, sell, manufacture
and market our products and product candidates will hurt our business, prospects, financial results and may impact our access
to capital.
Write-offs related to impairment of goodwill, long-lived assets, inventories and other non-cash charges may adversely impact
profitability and cause cash flows to differ from reported earnings
We may incur significant non-cash charges related to impairment write-downs of our long-lived assets, including
goodwill. We are required to perform periodic impairment reviews of our goodwill at least annually. The carrying value of
goodwill on our balance sheet was $6.2 million at December 31, 2023. To the extent these reviews conclude that the expected
future cash flows generated from our business activities are not sufficient to recover the cost of our long-lived assets, we will
be required to measure and record an impairment charge to write-down these assets to their realizable values. We completed
our last review during the fourth quarter of 2023 and determined that goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2023.
However, there can be no assurance that upon completion of subsequent reviews a material impairment charge will not be
recorded. If future periodic reviews determine that our assets are impaired and a write-down is required, it will adversely
impact or delay our profitability.
Inventories, in part, include certain excipients that are sold to customers and included in products and product
candidates in development. These inventories are capitalized based on management’s judgment of probable sale prior to their
expiration date which in turn is primarily based on management’s internal estimates. The valuation of inventory requires us to
estimate the value of inventory that may expire prior to use. We may be required to expense previously capitalized inventory
costs upon a change in our judgment, due to, among other potential factors, a denial or delay of approval of a product by the
necessary regulatory bodies, changes in product development timelines, or other information that suggests that the inventory
will not be saleable.
Global credit and financial market conditions could negatively impact the value of our investments
Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of 90 days or less
at the time of purchase. Our short-term investments consist primarily of readily marketable debt securities with original
maturities of greater than 90 days from the date of purchase but remaining maturities of less than one year from the balance
sheet date. Our long-term
48
investments consist primarily of readily marketable debt securities with maturities of one year or beyond from the balance
sheet date. No assurance can be given that deterioration in conditions of the global credit and financial markets would not
negatively impact our current portfolio of cash equivalents, short-term investments or long-term investments or our ability to
meet our financing objectives.
Our corporate headquarters, certain manufacturing facilities and personnel are located in a seismically active area near
wildfire zones
Our corporate headquarters, certain manufacturing facilities and personnel are located in a geographical area that is known
to be seismically active and prone to earthquakes, as well as wildfires and related power outages or power shortages. Should
such a natural disaster or power outage or power shortage occur, our ability to conduct our business could be severely restricted,
and our business and assets, including the results of our research, development and manufacturing efforts, could be harmed or
destroyed.
If we seek approval to commercialize our current or future drug candidates outside of the United States, a variety of risks
associated with international operations could harm our business
If we seek approval of our current or future drug candidates outside of the United States, we expect that we will be subject
to additional risks including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
different regulatory requirements for approval of therapies in foreign countries;
the potential for reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
the potential requirement of additional clinical studies in international jurisdictions;
unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements;
economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets;
compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;
foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses and reduced revenues, and other
obligations incident to doing business in another country;
foreign reimbursement, pricing and insurance regimes;
• workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;
•
•
production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and
business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters and public
health pandemics.
We have no prior experience in these areas. In addition, there are complex regulatory, tax, labor and other legal
requirements imposed by many of the individual countries in and outside of Europe with which we will need to comply. Many
biopharmaceutical companies have found the process of marketing their own products in foreign countries to be very
challenging.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
If we are unable to protect, maintain or enforce our intellectual property rights or secure rights to third-party intellectual
property, or if our intellectual property rights are inadequate to protect our
49
technology and product candidates, our competitive position could be harmed, we may lose valuable assets, lose market
share or incur costly litigation or our third-party collaborators may choose to terminate their agreements with us
Our ability to commercially exploit our products will depend significantly on our ability to obtain and maintain patents,
maintain trade secret protection and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of
pharmaceutical companies, including ours, are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. There can be no
assurance that the pending patent applications will be granted, and if granted, they may fail to result in issued patents with
claims that cover our product candidates or technologies.
As of March 26, 2024, we owned or exclusively in-licensed over 15 unexpired issued U.S. patents and over 165 unexpired
issued foreign patents (which include granted European patent rights that have been validated in various EU member states). In
addition, we have over 20 pending U.S. patent applications and over 135 foreign applications pending in Europe, Australia, Japan,
Canada and other countries.
There can be no assurance that the pending patent applications will be granted. Further, there can be no assurance that
VCU will not attempt to terminate their license to us, which termination could result in the loss of our rights to certain of these
patent families.
The patent positions of pharmaceutical companies, including ours, are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual
questions. In addition, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before the patent is issued. Even
if patents have been issued, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such
patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws
in the United States or elsewhere could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications
and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. Further, there can be no assurance that VCU will not attempt to terminate
their license to us, which termination could result in the loss of our rights to certain of these patent families. Consequently, our
patent applications or those that are licensed to us may not issue into patents, and any issued patents may not provide
protection against competitive technologies or may be held invalid if challenged. Our competitors may also independently
develop products similar to ours or design around or otherwise circumvent patents issued to us or licensed by us. Moreover,
patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States and in many other countries, the natural expiration of a patent is generally
20 years after it is filed, and once any patents covering a product expire, generic competitors may enter the market. We may not
be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on all of our
product candidates throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries
outside the United States may be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries
may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as U.S. law, if at all. Competitors may use our technologies in
jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise
infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as in the United States.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, the value of our technology could be materially adversely
affected and our business would be harmed
We also rely upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our
competitive position. We require our employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to execute confidentiality and
assignment-of-inventions agreements with us. These agreements typically provide that all materials and confidential information
developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and
not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances, and that all inventions arising out of the individual’s relationship
with us will be our exclusive property. These agreements may be breached, and
50
in some instances, we may not have an appropriate remedy available for breach of the agreements. Furthermore, our
competitors may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, reverse engineer our
information and techniques, or otherwise gain access to our proprietary technology. We also seek to preserve the integrity and
confidentiality of our confidential proprietary information by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and
electronic security of our information technology systems, but it is possible that these security measures could be breached. If
any of our confidential proprietary information were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we
would have no right to prevent such competitor from using that technology or information to compete with us, which could harm
our competitive position. We may be unable to meaningfully protect our rights in trade secrets, technical know-how and other
non-patented technology.
We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed
confidential information of third parties
We employ individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or biopharmaceutical companies. Although
we try to ensure that our employees, consultants and advisors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in
their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have
inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed confidential information of our employees’ former employers or other third parties.
Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. There is no guarantee of success in defending these claims, and
even if we are successful, litigation could result in substantial cost and be a distraction to our management and other employees.
Even if we are successful in defending against these types of claims, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual
property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses and could distract our technical and management personnel from
their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim
proceedings or developments, and, if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, that perception could
have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. This type of litigation or proceeding could substantially
increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development activities. Some of our competitors may be
able to sustain the costs of this type of litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially
greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of intellectual property litigation or other
intellectual property related proceedings could adversely affect our ability to compete in the marketplace.
We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship of our patents and other intellectual property
We or our licensors may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in
our owned or in-licensed patents, trade secrets, or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. For example, we or
our licensors may have inventorship disputes arise from conflicting obligations of employees, consultants or others who are
involved in developing our product candidates. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging
inventorship or our or our licensors’ ownership of our owned or in-licensed patents, trade secrets or other intellectual property. If
we or our licensors fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual
property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, intellectual property that is important to our product candidates.
Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to
management and other employees. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee
payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies and our patent protection could be reduced or
eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements
51
The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural,
documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. In addition, periodic maintenance
fees on issued patents often must be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies over the lifetime of the patent. While an
unintentional lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable
rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in premature abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent
application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could
result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official
actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or
our licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates, we may not be able to stop a
competitor from marketing drugs that are the same as or similar to our product candidates, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business.
We may be involved in lawsuits and other legal proceedings to protect or enforce our intellectual property, which could be
expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.Any such adverse result or determination could have a material adverse effect
on our business.
Competitors may infringe our issued patents or any patents issued as a result of our pending or future patent applications.
We may have to resort to litigation or arbitration to protect our intellectual property rights, or to determine their scope, validity or
enforceability. In addition, interference, derivation, post-grant oppositions, and similar proceedings may be necessary to
determine rights to inventions in our patents and patent applications. Enforcing or defending our proprietary rights is expensive,
could cause diversion of our resources and may be unsuccessful. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide
that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable or may refuse to stop the other party in such infringement proceeding from
using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. Any failure to enforce or
protect our rights could cause us to lose the ability to exclude others from using our technology to develop or sell competing
products. In addition, in some circumstances our collaborators have the first right to enforce our patents against third party
infringers, and such collaborators may not enforce such claims adequately or successfully or in the manner that we would do
ourselves. Litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims, with or without merit, are unpredictable
and generally expensive and time-consuming and, even if resolved in our favor, are likely to divert significant resources from our
core business, including distracting our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there
could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities
analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the market price of our
common stock. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings.
Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because
of their greater financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios. Accordingly, despite our
efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating or from successfully challenging our
intellectual property rights. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.
We may be sued by third parties claiming that our products or product candidates infringe on their intellectual property rights,
particularly because there is substantial uncertainty about the validity and breadth of biopharmaceutical patents
Numerous third-party U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications exist in the fields in which we are
developing product candidates, and there may be third-party patents or patent applications with claims to compositions,
formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment related to the use or manufacture of our product candidates and
technologies. We or our collaborators
52
may be exposed to future litigation by third parties based on claims that our products, product candidates or activities infringe
the intellectual property rights of others. We may also be subject to claims asserting that we, our collaborators, our employees,
consultants or advisors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their current or former employers or claims
asserting ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property. These risks are exacerbated by the fact that the validity
and breadth of claims covered in medical technology, pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents and the breadth and scope of
trade secret protection involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles are unresolved. Any
litigation or claims against us or our collaborators, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs, could place a significant
strain on our financial resources and could harm our reputation and business prospects. We also may not have sufficient funds to
litigate, particularly against parties with substantially greater resources. In addition, pursuant to our collaborative agreements,
we have provided our collaborators with the right, under specified circumstances, to defend against any claims of infringement of
the third-party intellectual property rights, and such collaborators may not defend against such claims adequately or successfully
or in the manner that we would do ourselves. Intellectual property litigation or claims could force us or our collaborators to do
one or more of the following, any of which could harm our business or financial results:
•
•
•
cease selling, incorporating or using any of our products or product candidates that incorporate the challenged
intellectual property;
obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which license may be costly or may not be
available on reasonable terms, if at all; or
redesign our products or product candidates, which would be costly and time-consuming and may not be successful.
Our collaboration agreements may depend on our intellectual property
We are party to collaborative agreements with Innocoll and Orient Pharma, among others. Our third-party collaborators
have entered into these agreements based on the exclusivity that our intellectual property rights confer on the products being
developed. The loss or diminution of our intellectual property rights could result in a decision by our third-party collaborators to
terminate their agreements with us. In addition, these agreements are generally complex and contain provisions that could give
rise to legal disputes, including potential disputes concerning ownership of intellectual property and data under collaborations.
Such disputes can lead to lengthy, expensive litigation or arbitration requiring us to devote management time and resources to
such disputes which we would otherwise spend on our business.
Risks Related To Our Industry
The markets for our pharmaceutical products, product candidates and for our ALZET product line are rapidly changing and
competitive, and new products or technologies developed by others could impair our ability to establish, maintain or grow our
business and remain competitive
The pharmaceutical industry is subject to rapid and substantial technological change. Developments by others may render
our products, product candidates under development or technologies noncompetitive or obsolete, or we may be unable to keep
pace with technological developments or other market factors. Technological competition in the industry from pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies, universities, governmental entities and others diversifying into the field is intense and is expected
to increase.
53
We may face competition from other companies in numerous industries including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, medical
devices and drug delivery. Competition for larsucosterol, if approved, will depend on the specific indication(s) for which
larsucosterol is approved. Afimmune Ltd., Alfasigma S.p.A., Akaza Bioscience Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH,
Immuron Ltd., Mallinckrodt plc, MedRegen LLC, Novartis Pharma AG, PharmaKing Co. Ltd, Surrozen, Inc., and others have
development plans for products to treat AH.
Competition for our ALZET product line primarily consists of customers choosing to utilize delivery methods for their
research projects other than an osmotic pump. We also face competition for our ALZET product line from other companies
including low cost foreign competitors.
We are engaged in the development of novel therapeutic technologies. Our resources are limited and we may experience
technical challenges inherent in such novel technologies. Competitors have developed or are in the process of developing
technologies that are, or in the future may be, the basis for competitive products. Some of these products may have an entirely
different approach or means of accomplishing similar therapeutic effects than our products and product candidates. Our
competitors may develop products that are safer, more effective or less costly than our products and product candidates and,
therefore, present a serious competitive threat to our product candidates and product offerings.
The widespread acceptance of therapies that are alternatives to ours may limit market acceptance of our products and
product candidates if commercialized. For example, post-operative pain is currently being treated by oral medication,
transdermal drug delivery systems, such as drug patches, long-acting and short-acting injectable products and implantable drug
delivery devices which are competitive with our products and product candidates. Many of these treatments are widely accepted
in the medical community and have a long history of use. The established use of these competitive products may limit the
potential for our products and product candidates to receive widespread acceptance if and when commercialized.
Our relationships with physicians, patients and third-party payers are subject to anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, privacy and
other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages,
reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings
Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payers will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of
POSIMIR and any additional product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party
payers and customers may expose us and our partners to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and
regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we and our partners may
market, sell and distribute our products. As a pharmaceutical company, even though we do not and may not control referrals of
healthcare services or bill directly to Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payers, federal and state healthcare laws and
regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse and patients’ rights are and will be applicable to our business. These regulations
include:
•
•
the Federal Healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully
soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or
in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service,
for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid, and which will
constrain our marketing practices and the marketing practices of our licensees, educational programs, pricing policies,
and relationships with healthcare providers or other entities;
the federal physician self-referral prohibition, commonly known as the Stark Law, which prohibits physicians from
referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to providers of “designated
54
•
•
•
•
•
•
health services” with whom the physician or a member of the physician’s immediate family has an ownership interest
or compensation arrangement, unless a statutory or regulatory exception applies;
federal false claims laws that prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing
to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other government reimbursement programs that are
false or fraudulent, and which may expose entities that provide coding and billing advice to customers to potential
criminal and civil penalties, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, and including as a result of claims
presented in violation of the Federal Healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law or other healthcare-related laws,
including laws enforced by the FDA;
the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal and civil
liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program and also created federal criminal laws that
prohibit knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false
statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services, and which as
amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, also imposes
obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission
of individually identifiable health information;
federal physician sunshine requirements under the Affordable Care Act, which requires manufacturers of drugs,
devices, biologics and medical supplies to report annually to HHS information related to payments and other transfers
of value to physicians, other healthcare providers, and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held
by physicians and other healthcare providers and their immediate family members and applicable group purchasing
organizations;
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which, among other things, strictly regulates drug product marketing,
prohibits manufacturers from marketing drug products for off-label use and regulates the distribution of drug samples;
state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws, which
may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-
governmental third-party payers, including private insurers, state laws requiring pharmaceutical companies to comply
with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance
promulgated by the federal government and which may require drug manufacturers to report information related to
payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures, many
of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by federal laws such as HIPAA, thus
complicating compliance efforts; and
HIPPA and other state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information or other personal
information, such as the European Union General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") (EU 2016/679), which require
limitations regarding access and use of certain personal and health information.
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare and privacy laws and
regulations do and will in the future involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our
business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse
or other healthcare or privacy laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any
55
other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties,
damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the
curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to
do business are found to not be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative
sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.
We could be exposed to significant product liability claims which could be time consuming and costly to defend, divert
management attention and adversely impact our ability to obtain and maintain insurance coverage
The testing, clinical development, manufacture, marketing and sale of our products and product candidates involve an
inherent risk that product liability claims will be asserted against us. Our present product liability insurance may be inadequate
and may not fully cover the costs of any claim(s) or any ultimate damages we might be required to pay. Product liability claims or
other claims related to our products and product candidates, regardless of their outcome, could require us to spend significant
time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages. Any successful product liability claim may prevent us from obtaining
adequate product liability insurance in the future on commercially desirable or reasonable terms. In addition, product liability
coverage may cease to be available in sufficient amounts or at an acceptable cost. An inability to obtain sufficient insurance
coverage at an acceptable cost or otherwise to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the
commercialization of our products or product candidates if and when approved. A product liability claim could also significantly
harm our reputation and delay or prevent market acceptance of our products and product candidates.
56
Healthcare reform measures could hinder or prevent our product candidates’ commercial success
In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of
legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system, including cost-containment measures that may reduce or limit
coverage and reimbursement for newly approved drugs, that could prevent or delay marketing approval of our product
candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities, affect our ability to profitably sell any product or product candidates for
which we obtain marketing approval and otherwise affect our future revenue and profitability and the future revenue and
profitability of our collaborators or potential collaborators. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of
initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs and improve the quality of healthcare. For
examples of healthcare reform measures, see “Part I, Item 1. Business—Government Regulation—Healthcare Reform” above.
Market acceptance of, and market opportunity for, our products or product candidates is uncertain, and failure to achieve
market acceptance will delay our ability to generate or grow revenues
Our future financial performance will depend upon the successful introduction and customer acceptance of our products or
products we have licensed to others, including larsucosterol, if approved, and Innocoll’s POSIMIR, Indivior’s PERSERIS and Orient
Pharma’s Methydur. Even if approved for marketing, these products and product candidates may not achieve market acceptance
or the market opportunities for our current and potential future product candidates may be smaller than we predicted, which
could adversely affect our future product revenues and could cause our business to suffer. The degree of market acceptance will
depend upon a number of factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the degree of unmet need in the market for the approved indication(s);
the receipt of regulatory clearance of marketing claims for the uses that we are developing;
the approved product labeling;
pricing, reimbursement and formulary access;
the degree of resources applied to promotion and other commercial activities;
the establishment and demonstration in the medical community of the safety and clinical efficacy of our products and
their potential advantages over existing therapies; and
pricing, access and reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors such as insurance companies, health
maintenance organizations, hospital formularies and other health plan administrators.
Physicians, patients, payers or the medical community in general may be unwilling to accept, utilize or recommend any of
the products we have developed. If these products do not achieve widespread market acceptance, we will not achieve
meaningful revenues.
If we or our third-party collaborators are unable to train physicians to use our products and product candidates to treat
patients’ diseases or medical conditions, we may not achieve market acceptance of our products
Broad use of certain of our products or out-licensed products, such as POSIMIR, will require extensive training of numerous
physicians on their proper and safe use. The time required to train physicians could delay adoption of our products and adversely
affect market acceptance of our products. We or third parties selling our products may be unable to rapidly train physicians in
numbers sufficient to generate adequate demand for our products. Any delay in training would materially delay the demand for
our products and harm our business and financial results. In addition, we or our partners may expend significant funds towards
such training before any orders are placed for our products, which would increase our expenses and harm our financial results.
57
If users of our products are unable to obtain adequate reimbursement from third-party payers, obtain access to our
product(s), or if new restrictive legislation is adopted, market acceptance of our products may be limited and we may not achieve
meaningful revenues or profitability
The continuing efforts of government and insurance companies, health maintenance organizations and other payers of
healthcare costs to contain or reduce costs of health care may affect our future revenues and profitability, and the future
revenues and profitability of our potential customers, suppliers and third-party collaborators and the availability of capital. For
example, in certain foreign markets, pricing, access and/or profitability of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to government
control. In the United States, recent federal and state government initiatives have been directed at lowering the total cost of
health care, and the U.S. Congress and state legislatures will likely continue to focus on health care reform, the cost of
prescription pharmaceuticals and on the reform of the Medicare and Medicaid systems. While we cannot predict whether any
such legislative or regulatory proposals will be adopted, the announcement or adoption of such proposals could materially harm
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The successful commercialization of our current and future products will depend in part on the extent to which appropriate
reimbursement levels for the cost of our products and related treatment are obtained from governmental authorities, private
health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”). Third-party payers often limit
access, payments and/or reimbursement for medical products and services. Also, the trend toward managed health care in the
United States and the concurrent growth of organizations such as HMOs, which could control or significantly influence the
purchase of health care services and products, as well as legislative proposals to reform health care or reduce government
insurance programs, may limit access, reimbursement or payment for our products. The cost containment measures that health
care payers and providers are instituting and the effect of any health care reform could materially harm our ability to operate
profitably and access capital.
Risks related to actions on trade by the U.S. and foreign governments could adversely affect our Company's results of
operations and financial condition
Changes in U.S. trade policy have resulted in, and could continue to result in, one or more U.S. trading partners adopting
responsive trade policy or tariffs making it more difficult or costly for us to export our products to those countries. The imposition
of additional tariffs by the United States could result in the adoption of additional tariffs by other countries. These measures could
result in increased costs for goods imported into the United States. A potential resulting trade war could have a significant
adverse effect on world trade and the world economy. This in turn could require us to increase prices to our customers which may
reduce demand, or, if we are unable to increase prices, result in lowering our margin on products sold.
We cannot predict future trade policy or the terms of any renegotiated trade agreements and their impact on our business.
The adoption and expansion of trade restrictions, the occurrence of a trade war, or other governmental action related to tariffs or
trade agreements or policies has the potential to adversely impact demand for our products, our costs, our customers, our
suppliers, and the U.S. economy, which in turn could adversely impact our business, financial condition, access to capital and
results of operations.
Risks Related To Our Common Stock
Our stock price has in the past and may in the future not meet the minimum bid price for continued listing on Nasdaq. Our
ability to continue operations or to publicly or privately sell equity securities and the liquidity of our common stock could be
adversely affected if we are delisted from Nasdaq
In several instances in the past, including as recently as December 21, 2023, we received written notifications from Nasdaq
informing us that because the closing bid price of our common stock was below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days (the
“Minimum Closing Bid Price Requirement”), our shares no longer complied with the Minimum Closing Bid Price Requirement for
continued listing on Nasdaq
58
under Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Each time, we were given a period of 180 days from the date of the notification and in one case
an extra 180-day period to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements by having the closing bid price of our common
stock listed on Nasdaq be at least $1.00 for at least 10 consecutive trading days.
If our shares again no longer comply with the Minimum Closing Bid Price Requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq
Capital Market under Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) and we do not regain compliance with the Minimum Closing Bid Price
Requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) within the applicable
180-day time period, Nasdaq will notify us that our securities will be subject to delisting. One strategy to regain compliance in
such circumstances would be to implement a reverse stock split. For example, we implemented such a strategy to regain
compliance with the Minimum Closing Bid Price Requirement when we completed a 1-for-10 reverse stock split in December
2022. We could also appeal Nasdaq’s determination to delist our securities to a Hearings Panel. During any appeal process,
shares of our common stock would continue to trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
There can be no assurance that we will regain compliance with the requirements for listing our common stock on the
Nasdaq Capital Market. Delisting from Nasdaq would constitute an event of default under our loan facility with Oxford, entitling
Oxford to accelerate our obligations under such facility, among other actions. Under such circumstances, we could be required to
renegotiate the repayment terms of our loan facility, on terms which would not be as favorable to our Company as our current
terms, or we could be required to take other actions, such as discontinuing some or all of our operations, selling assets, or other
actions. Delisting could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital through the public or private sale of equity
securities, would significantly affect the ability of investors to trade our securities and would negatively affect the value and
liquidity of our common stock. Delisting could also have other negative results, including the potential loss of confidence by
employees, the loss of institutional investor interest and fewer business development opportunities.
Additionally, there can be no assurance that a reverse stock split would result in a per-share market price that will maintain
compliance with the Minimum Closing Bid Price Requirement, that will attract institutional investors or investment funds or that
such share price will satisfy investing guidelines of institutional investors or investment funds. As a result, the trading liquidity of
our common stock could decline. Further, if the market price of our common stock declines, the percentage decline may be
greater than would have occurred in the absence of a reverse stock split.
Our operating history makes evaluating our stock difficult
Our quarterly and annual results of operations have historically fluctuated and we expect will continue to fluctuate for the
foreseeable future. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied upon as predictive
of future performance. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties encountered by
companies with a limited number of approved pharmaceutical products, particularly companies in new and rapidly evolving
markets such as pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. To address these risks, we must, among other things, obtain regulatory
approval for and commercialize our product candidates, which may not occur. We may not be successful in addressing these risks
and difficulties. We expect to require additional funds to complete the development of larsucosterol or our other product
candidates, and to fund operating losses to be incurred in the next several years.
The price of our common stock may be volatile
The stock markets in general, and the markets for pharmaceutical stocks in particular, have experienced extreme volatility
that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
59
Price declines in our common stock have in the past and could in the future result from general market and economic conditions
and a variety of other factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
adverse results (including adverse events or failure to demonstrate safety, efficacy or statistical significance) or delays
in our clinical and non-clinical trials of larsucosterol or other product candidates;
announcements of FDA non-approval of our product candidates, approvals with narrow indications, commercially
limiting labels, clinical holds or delays in the FDA or other foreign regulatory agency review process;
adverse actions taken by regulatory agencies or law enforcement agencies with respect to our products and product
candidates, clinical trials, manufacturing processes, accounting practices or sales and marketing activities, or those of
our third-party collaborators;
announcements of technological innovations, patents, product approvals, sales performance or new products by our
competitors;
failure of third-party collaborators to continue development or successful commercialization of the respective products
and product candidates they are developing or commercializing;
failure by our commercial licensee (Innocoll) to successfully manufacture and store adequate supplies, and/or to
achieve sales expectations and successfully commercialize POSIMIR;
regulatory, judicial and patent developments in the United States and foreign countries;
any lawsuit or arbitration involving us or our products and product candidates including intellectual property
infringement or product liability suits;
announcements concerning our competitors, or the biotechnology or pharmaceutical industries in general;
developments concerning our strategic alliances or termination of such alliances or acquisitions or dispositions;
actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;
changes in recommendations by securities analysts, misstatements or mischaracterizations in analyst reports or
dropping or lack of analyst coverage;
negative press coverage or online or social media misinformation about the Company or its partners or their respective
products or personnel;
deviations in our operating results from the estimates of analysts;
sales of our common stock by our executive officers or directors or sales of substantial amounts of common stock by us
or others;
potential failure to meet continuing listing standards from The Nasdaq Capital Market;
loss or disruption of facilities due to natural disasters;
acceleration of our debt obligations due to a determination by our lender that a material adverse change has occurred;
changes in accounting principles; or
loss of any of our key scientific or management personnel.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to factors which are beyond our control. The
stock market in general has periodically experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. For example, the COVID-19
pandemic, pronouncements by the Federal Reserve, inflation,
60
outbreaks of war such as between Russia and Ukraine or Israel and Hamas, oil price volatility and other factors have caused
broad stock market and industry fluctuations. In addition, the market prices of securities of technology and pharmaceutical
companies have also been extremely volatile, and have experienced fluctuations that often have been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations could result in extreme
fluctuations in the price of our common stock, which could cause a decline in the value of our common stock.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company’s securities, litigation has often been
brought against that company. If litigation of this type is brought against us, it could be extremely expensive, particularly if we
were to lose the lawsuit and have to pay damages, and divert management’s attention and our Company’s resources.
Investors may experience substantial dilution of their investment
In order to raise capital and for other purposes, we may in the future offer and issue additional shares of our common stock
or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, and the price per share at which we sell additional
shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock in future transactions may
be higher or lower than the price per share at which investors in our common stock bought their shares. In July 2021, we filed the
2021 Registration Statement to sell up to $250 million of securities from time to time in one or more public offerings, including up
to $75.0 million of shares of common stock through the 2021 Sales Agreement. Any sales in the public market of our common
stock, under the 2021 Sales Agreement, in offerings under our shelf registration statement or otherwise, could adversely affect
prevailing market prices for our common stock. In 2023, we raised net proceeds (net of commissions) of approximately $1.6
million from the sale of our common stock in the open market under the 2021 Sales Agreement. In February and March 2024, we
raised net proceeds (net of commissions) of approximately $648,000 from the sale of our common stock in the open market
under the 2021 Sales Agreement. As of March 26, 2024, we had up to $222.7 million of our securities available for sale under the
2021 Registration Statement, of which $72.7 million of our common stock are available pursuant to the 2021 Sales Agreement.
On February 3, 2023, we consummated a registered direct financing pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 1,700,000 shares
of our common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 300,000 shares of our common stock and common warrants to
purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock. Each share of common stock and accompanying common warrant and
each pre-funded warrant and accompanying common warrant were sold together at a combined offering price of $5.00 per share
and accompanying warrant or, in the case of pre-funded warrants, $4.99999 per pre-funded warrant and accompanying common
warrant. Additionally, on July 19, 2023, we consummated a registered direct financing pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of
2,991,027 shares of our common stock and common warrants to purchase up to 2,991,027 shares of our common stock. Each
share of common stock and accompanying common warrant were sold together at a combined offering price of $5.015 per share
and accompanying warrant. Investors have in the past and could in the future experience substantial dilution of their investment
as a result of subsequent exercises of the outstanding warrants.
In addition, as of December 31, 2023, 885,208 shares of our common stock were issuable upon exercise of stock options
outstanding under our stock option plans at a weighted average exercise price of $9.37 per share, 4,128,259 additional shares of
common stock were reserved for potential future issuance under our stock option plan, and an aggregate of 55,667 shares of
common stock were reserved for potential future issuance under our 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. At December 31, 2023,
we had 150,000,000 authorized shares of common stock and, as such, we have the ability to issue significantly more shares and
options in the future, which would result in substantial dilution to our stockholders, including investors in this offering.
61
Our ability to use net operating losses and certain other tax attributes is uncertain and may be limited
Our ability to use our federal and state net operating losses to offset potential future taxable income and related income
taxes that would otherwise be due is dependent upon our generation of future taxable income before the expiration dates of the
net operating losses, and we cannot predict with certainty when, or whether, we will generate sufficient taxable income to use
any or all of our net operating losses. In addition, utilization of net operating losses to offset potential future taxable income and
related income taxes that would otherwise be due is subject to annual limitations under the “ownership change” provisions of
Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code") and similar state
provisions, which may result in the expiration of net operating losses before future utilization. In general, under the Code, if a
corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership
over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating losses and other pre-change tax attributes
(such as research and development credit carryforwards) to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. Our
equity offerings and other changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, may have resulted or could
in the future result in an ownership change. If an ownership change limitation were to apply, utilization of our net operating
losses and tax credit carryforwards could be limited in future periods and a portion of the carryforwards could expire before being
available to reduce future income tax liabilities.
We have broad discretion over the use of our cash and investments, and their investment may not always yield a favorable
return
Our management has broad discretion over how our cash and investments are made and used. We may from time to time
invest in ways with which our stockholders may not agree and that do not yield favorable returns.
Our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage another company from
acquiring us
Provisions of Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or
acquisition that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for
your shares. These provisions include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock without any need for action by stockholders;
providing for a classified board of directors with staggered terms;
requiring supermajority stockholder voting to effect certain amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws;
eliminating the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent; and
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing
matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
Our bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes
between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes
with us or our directors, officers or employees
Our bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for any derivative action or
proceeding brought on behalf of our Company, any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director,
officer or other employee of our Company, any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the General
Corporation Law of Delaware or our Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws or any action asserting a claim governed by the internal
affairs
62
doctrine. The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable
for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our
directors, officers and other employees.
Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our certificate of incorporation to be
inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other
jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Because our Company is a “smaller reporting company,” we may take advantage of certain scaled disclosures available to us,
resulting in holders of our securities receiving less Company information than they would receive from a public company that
is not a smaller reporting company
We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act. As a smaller reporting company, we may take
advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies and will be able to take advantage of
these scaled disclosures for so long as (i) our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million
measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100 million during the
most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million
measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter. To the extent we take advantage of any reduced disclosure
obligations, it may make it harder for investors to analyze our Company’s results of operations and financial prospectus in
comparison with other public companies.
63
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy:
We recognize the importance of assessing, identifying, and managing material risks associated with cybersecurity threats,
as such term is defined in Item 106(a) of Regulation S-K. These risks include, among other things, operational risks; intellectual
property theft; fraud; extortion; harm to employees or customers; violation of privacy or security laws and other litigation and
legal risk; and reputational risks.
We also maintain an incident response plan to coordinate the activities we take to protect against, detect, respond to and
remediate cybersecurity incidents, as such term is defined in Item 106(a) of Regulation S-K, as well as to comply with potentially
applicable legal obligations and mitigate brand and reputational damage.
We have implemented several cybersecurity processes, technologies, and controls to aid in our efforts to identify, assess,
and manage material risks, as well as to test and improve our incident response plan. Our approach includes, among other
things:
• We conduct regular network and endpoint monitoring, vulnerability assessments, and penetration testing to improve
our information systems, as such term is defined in Item 106(a) of Regulation S-K. Disaster Recovery is tested using
various methods such as recovery exercises to simulate a response to a cybersecurity incident, and we use the findings
to improve our security, processes, procedures and technologies.
•
Regular cybersecurity training programs are in place for employees, management and directors. In addition, we
conduct annual customer data handling and use requirements training for all employees.
• We compare our processes to standards set by the NIST.
•
Incident handling incorporates the NIST incident handling framework to develop our cybersecurity response procedures
and to help us identify, protect, detect, respond and recover when there is an actual or potential cybersecurity incident.
• We routinely identify and filter out potential threats through threat intelligence processes, attack signatures, and
geographic IP filtering.
• We closely monitor emerging data protection laws such as GDPR and carefully implement changes to our processes
when required for compliance.
• We conduct regular phishing email simulations for all employees to enhance awareness and responsiveness to such
possible threats.
•
Through policy, practice and contract (as applicable), we require employees, as well as third-parties who provide
services on our behalf, to treat customer information and data with care.
• We maintain cybersecurity insurance coverage.
Our process for identifying and assessing material risks from cybersecurity threats incorporates a risk matrix for identifying
risk levels for interconnected systems. As part of this process appropriate disclosure personnel will collaborate with subject
matter specialists, as necessary, to gather insights for identifying and assessing material cybersecurity threat risks, their
severity, and potential mitigations.
64
As part of the above approach and processes, we regularly engage with assessors, consultants and other third-parties to
review various parts of our cybersecurity program to help identify areas for continued focus, improvement and/or compliance.
Our processes also address oversight and identification of cybersecurity threat risks from our use of third-party service
providers, including those in our supply chain. This involves, among other things, conducting pre-engagement risk-based
diligence, implementing contractual security and notification provisions, and ongoing monitoring as needed.
We describe whether and how risks from identified cybersecurity threats have materially affected or are reasonably likely
to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition, included as part of our risk
factor disclosures at Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which disclosures are incorporated by reference herein.
In the last two fiscal years, we have experienced no material cybersecurity incidents, and the expenses we have incurred
from any cybersecurity incidents were immaterial. This includes penalties and settlements, of which there were none.
Cybersecurity Governance:
Cybersecurity is an important part of our risk management processes and an area of increasing focus for our Board of
Directors (our “Board” or “Board of Directors”) and management.
The audit committee of our Board (the "Audit Committee") is responsible for the oversight of risks from cybersecurity
threats. At least annually, the Audit Committee receives an overview from management of our cybersecurity threat risk
management and strategy processes covering topics such as data security posture, results from third-party assessments,
progress towards pre-determined risk-mitigation-related goals, our incident response plan, and material cybersecurity threat risks
or incidents and developments, as well as the steps management has taken to respond to such risks. In such sessions, Audit
Committee members generally receive materials including a cybersecurity scorecard and other materials indicating current and
emerging cybersecurity threat risks, and describing our ability to mitigate those risks, and discusses such matters with our
Executive Director of IT. Members of the Audit Committee and the full Board are also encouraged to regularly engage in ad hoc
conversations with management on cybersecurity-related news events and discuss any updates to our cybersecurity risk
management and strategy programs. Materials of our cybersecurity threat risk management and strategy processes are also
periodically reviewed with the full Board.
Our cybersecurity risk management and strategy processes, which are discussed in greater detail above, are led by our
Executive Director of IT. This individual has over 25 years of prior work experience in various roles involving: managing
information security, developing cybersecurity strategy, implementing effective information and cybersecurity programs, and
developing and implementing IT change control policies and procedures, as well as holds several relevant degrees and
certifications, including a master’s degree in Computer Information Systems, Certified in Security+, and has completed extensive
cybersecurity training and testing in: Certified Professional Hacker (EMC White Hat Training), ISC2 Certified Information Systems
Security Professional (CISSP) Training, and NIST Framework Development and Deployment.
Our Executive Director of IT is informed about and monitors the prevention, mitigation, detection, and remediation of
cybersecurity incidents through management of, and participation in, the cybersecurity risk management and strategy processes
described above, including the operation of our incident response plan. If a cybersecurity incident is determined to be a material
cybersecurity incident, our incident response plan and cybersecurity disclosure controls and procedures define the process to
disclose such a material cybersecurity incident.
65
As discussed above, our Executive Director of IT reports to our CEO and informs the members of the Audit Committee and
the full Board about cybersecurity threat risks, among other cybersecurity related matters. All executives attend cybersecurity
training annually.
Item 2. Properties.
The following chart indicates the facilities that we lease, the location and size of each such facility and their designated use.
Location
Cupertino, CA
Approximate
Square Feet
30,149 sq. ft.
Operation
Office, Laboratory and
Manufacturing
Expiration
Lease expires 2027 (with an option to renew for an additional five
years)
Vacaville, CA
24,634 sq. ft.
Manufacturing
Lease expires 2028 (with an option to renew for an additional five
years)
We believe that our existing facilities are adequate to meet our current and foreseeable requirements.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are not a party to any material legal proceedings.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
66
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “DRRX”.
Holders
As of March 26, 2024, there were approximately 71 holders of record of shares of our common stock. This does not include
the number of persons whose stock is in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers.
Dividend Policy
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund the
development and growth of our business. Therefore, we do not currently anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Item 6. [Reserved]
67
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of December 31, 2023 and
2022 should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements, including the Notes thereto, and “Risk Factors” section
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. References to the “Company,” “DURECT,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to
DURECT Corporation.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or
elsewhere by management from time to time, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,”
“will,” “could,” “potentially,” “possibility,” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking
statements contained herein are based on current expectations and beliefs. Any such forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from those
discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.
Forward-looking statements made in this report include, but are not limited to, statements about:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the clinical trial plans and timelines for larsucosterol;
potential uses and benefits of larsucosterol to treat alcohol-associated hepatitis (“AH”), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis,
or other conditions;
the results and timing of clinical trials;
the likelihood of future clinical trial results of larsucosterol being positive with statistical significance and/or similar to
results from previous trials, the possible commencement of future clinical trials;
our communication with the FDA regarding next steps for the development of larsucosterol, including the trial design
for a Phase 3 clinical trial in AH;
our intention to seek, and ability to enter into and maintain strategic alliances and collaborations;
the potential benefits and uses of our products and product candidates, including larsucosterol and POSIMIR;
the potential milestone and royalty payments we may receive from Innocoll Pharmaceuticals Limited related to
POSIMIR, earn-out payments we may receive from Indivior UK Limited related to the commercialization of PERSERIS,
and milestone, sub-license fees and royalty payments we may receive from Orient Pharma Co., Ltd.;
• market opportunities for product candidates in our product development pipeline;
•
•
•
potential regulatory filings for or approval of larsucosterol;
the progress and results of our research and development programs and our evaluation of additional development
programs;
requirements for us to purchase pre-clinical, clinical trial and commercial supplies of product candidates and/or
products, as well as raw materials or active pharmaceutical ingredients from third parties, and the ability of third
parties to provide us with our requirements for such supplies and raw materials;
•
conditions for obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates;
68
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
submission and timing of applications for regulatory approval and timing of responses to our regulatory submissions;
the impact of FDA, European Medicines Agency and other government regulation on our business;
our ability to obtain, assert and protect patents and other intellectual property rights, including intellectual property
licensed to our collaborators, as well as avoiding the intellectual property rights of others;
products and companies that will compete with our products and the product candidates we develop and/or license to
third-party collaborators;
our employees, including the number of employees and the continued services of key management, technical and
scientific personnel;
our future performance, including our anticipation that we will not derive meaningful revenues from our products and
product candidates in development for at least the next twelve months, potential for future inventory write-offs and our
expectations regarding our ability to achieve profitability;
sufficiency of our cash resources, anticipated capital requirements and capital expenditures, our ability to comply with
covenants of our term loan, our need or desire for additional financing, including potential sales under our shelf
registration statement and our ability to continue to operate as a going concern;
our expectations regarding research and development expenses, and selling, general and administrative expenses;
the composition of future revenues; and
accounting policies and estimates.
We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual
events or results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. For a
more detailed discussion of such forward looking statements and the potential risks and uncertainties that may impact upon their
accuracy, see the “Risk Factors” section and “Overview” section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. These forward-looking statements reflect our view only as of the date of this report. We
undertake no obligations to update any forward-looking statements. You should also carefully consider the factors set forth in
other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
This discussion and analysis generally addresses 2023 and 2022 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2023 and
2022. Discussions of 2021 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021 that are not included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K can be found in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on March 8,
2023, which is available free of charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and the investor relations section of our website at
www.durect.com/investors/sec-filings/. These website addresses are intended to be inactive, textual references only. None of the
materials on, or accessible through, these websites are part of this report or are incorporated by reference herein. Throughout
this section, references to number of shares, stock price and exercise price have generally been conformed to reflect the effects
of the Company’s 1-for-10 reverse stock split, effective December 5, 2022, unless otherwise specified herein.
69
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company advancing novel and potentially lifesaving investigational therapies derived from our
Epigenetic Regulator Program. Larsucosterol, a new chemical entity in clinical development, is the lead candidate in our
Epigenetic Regulator Program. An endogenous, orally bioavailable small molecule, larsucosterol has been shown in both in vitro
and in vivo studies to play an important regulatory role in lipid metabolism, stress and inflammatory responses, and cell death
and survival. We are developing larsucosterol for alcohol-associated hepatitis (“AH”), a life-threatening acute liver condition with
no approved therapeutics and a 28-Day and 90-Day historical mortality rate of 20%-26% and 29%-31%, respectively. After
completing a Phase 2a trial in which 100% of AH patients treated with larsucosterol survived the 28-Day study period, we
conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b clinical trial called AHFIRM (trial in AH to evaluate saFety and effIcacy of
laRsucosterol treatMent). Through our AHFIRM trial, we evaluated larsucosterol’s potential to reduce mortality or liver
transplantation compared to a placebo with or without steroids at the investigators’ discretion. In total, we enrolled 307 patients
at leading hospitals in the U.S., Australia, E.U. and U.K. In November 2023, we announced topline data from the AHFIRM trial that
showed a compelling efficacy signal in favor of larsucosterol in the key secondary endpoint of mortality at 90 days. Both the 30
mg and 90 mg larsucosterol doses demonstrated clinically meaningful trends in reduction of mortality at 90 days with mortality
reductions of 41% (p=0.068) in the 30 mg arm and 35% (p=0.124) in the 90 mg arm compared with placebo. The numerical
improvement in the primary endpoint of mortality or liver transplant at 90 days did not achieve statistical significance for either
dose of larsucosterol. Both doses of larsucosterol in AHFIRM showed a more pronounced reduction in mortality in patients
enrolled in the U.S., representing 76% of patients enrolled in the trial. The reductions in mortality at 90 days were 57%
(p=0.014) in the 30 mg arm and 58% (p=0.008) in the 90 mg arm compared with placebo in the U.S. Larsucosterol was safe and
well tolerated. There were fewer treatment-emergent adverse events ("TEAEs") in the larsucosterol arms compared with
placebo. We are in ongoing communications with the FDA regarding next steps for the development of larsucosterol, including
the trial design for a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial in AH. We have also investigated larsucosterol in patients with metabolic
dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (“MASH”), also known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or NASH with encouraging results in
a Phase 1b clinical trial and may consider further development of larsucosterol for this and other indications.
In addition to our Epigenetic Regulator Program, we developed a novel and proprietary post-surgical pain product called
POSIMIR® that utilizes our innovative SABER® platform technology to enable continuous sustained delivery of bupivacaine, a non-
opioid local analgesic, over three days in adults. In February 2021, POSIMIR received FDA approval for post-surgical pain
reduction for up to 72 hours following arthroscopic subacromial decompression. In December 2021, we entered into a license
agreement (the “Innocoll Agreement”) with Innocoll Pharmaceuticals Limited (“Innocoll”), pursuant to which the Company
granted to Innocoll an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop, manufacture and commercialize
POSIMIR in the United States. In September 2022, Innocoll launched POSIMIR in the U.S.
As a result of the assignment of certain patent rights, we also receive single digit sales-based earn-out payments from U.S.
net sales of Indivior UK Limited (“Indivior”)’s PERSERIS®(risperidone) drug for schizophrenia and single-digit royalties from net
sales of Orient Pharma Co., Ltd. (“Orient Pharma”)’s Methydur Sustained Release Capsules (“Methydur”) for the treatment of
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) in Taiwan. We also manufacture and sell ALZET® osmotic pumps used in
laboratory research.
NOTE: POSIMIR® is a trademark of Innocoll Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. in the U.S. and a trademark of DURECT Corporation
outside of the U.S. SABER®, ORADUR™ and ALZET® are trademarks of DURECT Corporation. Other trademarks referred to belong
to their respective owners. Full prescribing information for POSIMIR, including BOXED WARNING and Medication Guide can be
found at
70
www.posimir.com. Full prescribing information for PERSERIS, including BOXED WARNING and Medication Guide can be found at
www.perseris.com.
Collaborative Research and Development and Other Revenue
Collaborative research and development and other revenue consists of three broad categories: (a) the recognition of
upfront license payments over the period of our continuing involvement with the third party, (b) the reimbursement of qualified
research expenses by third parties, (c) milestone payments in connection with our collaborative agreements and (d) royalties and
earn-out payments from our agreements with third parties. During the last three years, we generated collaborative research and
development revenues from collaborative agreements with Innocoll and others.
Product Revenue
We also currently generate product revenue from the sale of two product lines:
•
•
ALZET® osmotic pumps which are used for animal research; and
certain key excipients that are included in Methydur and one excipient that is included in POSIMIR and in a marketed
animal health product.
Because we consider our core business to be developing and commercializing pharmaceuticals, we do not intend to
significantly increase our investments in or efforts to sell or market any of our existing product lines. However, we expect that we
will continue to make efforts to increase our revenues related to collaborative research and development by entering into new
collaborations.
Operating Results
Since our inception in 1998, we have generally had a history of operating losses. At December 31, 2023, we had an
accumulated deficit of $589.0 million. Our net losses were $27.6 million and $35.3 million for the years ended December 31,
2023 and 2022, respectively. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred to research and develop our product
candidates and, to a lesser extent, from selling, general and administrative costs associated with our operations and product
sales. We expect our research and development expenses to decrease in 2024 compared to 2023 as we have completed the
AHFIRM trial and are evaluating our research and development spending plans. We expect our selling, general and administrative
expenses to decrease in 2024 compared to 2023 due to lower patent expenses and lower employee expenses in 2024. We
expect to incur continuing losses and negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future. As disclosed in the
“Liquidity and Capital Resources” section, we have concluded that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a
going concern for a period of at least 12 months from the date of issuance of these financial statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. We believe that the most significant accounting estimates and assumptions relate to revenue
recognition, prepaid and accrued clinical costs, prepaid and accrued manufacturing costs, and valuation of warrant liabilities. We
base our estimates on historical experience, current circumstances and various other assumptions that our management believes
to be reasonable under the circumstances. In many instances, we could reasonably use different accounting estimates, and in
some instances changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual
results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are differences between
our estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows will be affected. We believe that the critical accounting estimates discussed
71
below are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these estimates involve a significant level of
estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on the financial condition or results of
operations of the registrant.
Revenue Recognition
Product Revenue, Net
We manufacture and sell ALZET osmotic pumps used in laboratory research, and manufacture and sell certain excipients
used by pharmaceutical companies as raw materials in certain of their products, including POSIMIR, a marketed animal health
product and Methydur.
Revenue from product sales is recognized when the customer obtains control of our product, which occurs at a point in
time, typically upon shipment to the customer. We expense incremental costs of obtaining a contract as and when incurred if
the expected amortization period of the asset that we would have recognized is one year or less.
Trade Discounts and Allowances: We provide certain customers with discounts that are explicitly stated in our contracts
and are recorded as a reduction of revenues in the period the related product revenue is recognized.
Product Returns: Consistent with industry practice, we generally offer customers a limited right of return for products that
have been purchased from us. We estimate the amount of our product sales that are probable of being returned by our
customers and record this estimate as a reduction of revenue in the period the related product revenue is recognized. We
currently estimate product return liabilities primarily using our own historical sales information. We expect product returns to be
minimal.
Collaborative Research and Development and Other Revenue
We enter into license agreements under which we license certain rights to our product candidates or products to third
parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to us of one or more of the following: non-refundable, up-
front license fees; reimbursement of development costs incurred by us under approved work plans; development, regulatory,
intellectual property and commercial milestone payments; payments for manufacturing supply services we provide ourselves or
through our contract manufacturers; and royalties on net sales of licensed products. Each of these payments results in
collaborative research and development revenues, except for revenues from royalties on net sales of licensed products and earn-
out revenues, which are classified as other revenues.
In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as we fulfill our obligations under each of our
agreements, we perform the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination
of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the
contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the
transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) we satisfy each performance
obligation. For arrangements that are determined to include multiple performance obligations, we must develop assumptions
that require judgment to determine the estimated stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified. These
assumptions may include: forecasted revenues, development timelines, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, discount rates
and probabilities of technical and regulatory success. We expect to recognize revenue for the variable consideration currently
being constrained when it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur.
Licenses of Intellectual Property: If the license to our intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other
performance obligations identified in the arrangement, we recognize revenues from the transaction price allocated to the license
when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. For performance
obligations comprised of licenses that are bundled with other promises, we utilize judgment to assess the nature of the combined
72
performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time
and, if over time, we apply an appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing related revenue from the
allocated transaction price. For performance obligations recognized over time, we evaluate the measure of progress each
reporting period and recognize revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis as collaborative research and development revenues.
Milestone Payments: At the inception of each arrangement that includes development milestone payments, we evaluate
whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimate the amount to be included in the transaction
price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated
milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of us or the licensee,
such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The transaction
price is then allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis, for which we recognize
revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. At the end of each subsequent reporting
period, we re-evaluate the probability of achievement of such development milestones and any related constraint, and if
necessary, adjust our estimate of the overall transaction price.
Manufacturing Supply Services: Arrangements that include a promise for future supply of raw materials or drug product for
either clinical development or commercial supply at the customer’s discretion are generally considered as options. We assess if
these options provide a material right to the customer and, if so, they are accounted for as separate performance obligations and
allocate a portion of the transaction price based on the estimated standalone selling price of the material right. If we are entitled
to additional payments when the customer exercises these options, the deferred transaction price and any additional payments
are recorded in collaborative research and development revenue when the customer obtains control of the goods.
Royalties and Earn-outs: For arrangements that include sales-based royalties or earn-outs, including milestone payments
based on first commercial sale or the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties
relate, we recognize revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which
some or all of the royalty or earn-out has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). To date, we have not
recognized material royalty revenue resulting from our collaborative arrangements or material earn-out revenues from any of our
agreements.
Research and development services: Revenue from research and development services that are determined to represent a
distinct performance obligation related to services performed under the collaborative arrangements with our third-party
collaborators is recognized over time as the related research and development services are performed using an appropriate
method of measuring progress. We evaluate the measure of progress each reporting period and recognize revenue on a
cumulative catch-up basis, as collaborative research and development revenue. Research and development expenses under the
collaborative research and development agreements generally approximate or exceed the revenue recognized under such
agreements over the term of the respective agreements. Deferred revenue may result when we do not expend the required level
of effort during a specific period in comparison to funds received under the respective agreement.
We receive payments from our customers based on development cost schedules established in each contract. Up-front
payments are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due, and may require deferral of revenue recognition to a
future period until we performs our obligations under these arrangements. Amounts are recorded as accounts receivable when
our right to consideration is unconditional. We do not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the
expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of the promised
goods or services to the customer will be one year or less.
73
Prepaid and Accrued Clinical Costs
We incur significant costs associated with third party consultants and organizations for pre-clinical studies, clinical trials,
contract research, regulatory advice and other research and development-related services. We are required to estimate
periodically the cost of services rendered but unbilled based on management’s estimates. Estimates are determined each
reporting period by reviewing the terms and conditions of the underlying contracts, reviewing open purchase orders and by
having detailed discussions with internal clinical personnel and third-party service providers as to the nature and status of the
services performed in relation to amounts billed. The costs for unbilled services are estimated by applying the rates and fees
applicable in the underlying contracts. If these good faith estimates are inaccurate, actual expenses incurred could materially
differ from our estimates.
Common Stock Warrants
We review the terms of debt instruments, equity instruments, and other financing arrangements to determine whether
there are embedded derivative features, including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and
accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Additionally, in connection with the issuance of financing
instruments, we may issue freestanding options and warrants.
We account for our common stock warrants in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity ("ASC 480")
and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). Based upon the provisions of ASC 480 and ASC 815, we account for common
stock warrants and pre-funded warrants as current liabilities if the warrant fails the equity classification criteria. Common stock
warrants and pre-funded warrants classified as liabilities are initially recorded at fair value on the grant date and remeasured at
each balance sheet date with the offsetting adjustments recorded in change in fair value of warrant liabilities within the
statements of operations.
We value our pre-funded warrants and common stock warrants classified as liabilities using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model or other acceptable valuation models, including the Monte-Carlo simulation model.
Results of Operations
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022
Revenue
Collaborative research and development and other revenue
We recognize revenue from collaborative research and development activities and service contracts. Collaborative research
and development and other revenue primarily represents reimbursement of qualified expenses related to collaborative
agreements with various third parties to research, develop and commercialize potential products using our drug delivery
technologies, and revenue from the recognition of upfront fees and milestone payments in connection with our collaborative or
license agreements.
74
We expect our collaborative research and development and other revenue to fluctuate in future periods pending our efforts
to enter into potential new collaborations, our existing third-party collaborators’ commitment to and progress in the research and
development programs, and any royalty or earn-out revenue recognized from collaborators or counterparties. The collaborative
research and development and other revenue associated with our major collaborators or counterparties are as follows (in
thousands):
Collaborator/Counterparty
Innocoll (1)
Other (2)
Total collaborative research and development and other revenue
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
7 $
2,270
2,277 $
10,015
3,189
13,204
(1)
(2)
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2022, we recognized $8.0 million of patent milestone revenue and $2.0
million of first commercial sale milestone revenue under the Innocoll Agreement. See Note 2 "Strategic Agreements" -
"Agreement with Innocoll" to our financial statements for further information regarding the Innocoll Agreement.
Includes: (a) amounts related to earn-out revenue from Indivior UK Limited (Indivior) with respect to PERSERIS net
sales; (b) feasibility programs and research and development activities funded by our collaborators and (c) royalty
revenue from Orient Pharma with respect to Methydur net sales.
The decrease in collaborative research and development and other revenue in 2023 compared with 2022 was primarily due
to lower revenue recognized from the Innocoll Agreement and feasibility agreements with other companies.
As of December 31, 2023, we had potential milestones of up to $122.0 million that we may receive in the future under our
collaborative arrangements, of which $10.0 million are development-based milestones, $2.0 million are patent-based milestones
and $110.0 million are sales-based milestones. Within the category of development-based milestones, $10.0 million are related
to regulatory approvals. In January 2023, we received a $2.0 million sales-based milestone payment that was achieved and
recognized in September 2022 for the first commercial sale of POSIMIR by Innocoll.
Product revenue, net
A portion of our revenues is derived from product sales, which include our ALZET osmotic pump product line, and certain
excipients that are included in POSIMIR, Methydur and in a marketed animal health product. Net product revenues were $6.3
million and $6.1 million in 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The increase in product revenues in 2023 was primarily attributable to higher product revenue related to the sale of
excipients that are included in Methydur, partially offset by lower revenue from our ALZET osmotic pump product line as a result
of lower units sold compared to 2022.
Operating Expenses
Cost of product revenues
Cost of product revenues includes the cost of product revenue from our ALZET product line, and certain excipients that are
included in POSIMIR, Methydur and a marketed animal health product. Cost of product revenues was $1.7 million and $1.6 million
in 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The increase in cost of product revenues in 2023 was primarily attributable to higher cost of goods sold related to certain
excipients that are included in Methydur, partially offset by lower cost of goods sold related to our ALZET product line arising
from lower units sold compared with 2022.
75
Stock-based compensation related to cost of product revenues was $17,000 and $20,000 in 2023 and 2022, respectively.
As of December 31, 2023, we had 9 manufacturing employees compared with 10 as of December 31, 2022.
Research and development
Research and development expenses are primarily comprised of salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation and other
compensation costs associated with research and development personnel, overhead and facility costs, preclinical and non-clinical
development costs, clinical trial and related clinical manufacturing costs, contract services, and other outside costs. Research and
development expenses were $29.4 million and $36.9 million in 2023 and 2022, respectively. Stock-based compensation
recognized related to research and development personnel was $1.2 million in each of 2023 and 2022.
Research and development expenses decreased by approximately $7.5 million in 2023 compared to 2022. The decrease in
2023 was primarily attributable to lower research and development costs associated with larsucosterol and the depot injectable
programs, partially offset by higher research and development costs associated with other research programs compared to 2022,
as more fully discussed below. We expect our research and development expenses to decrease in 2024 compared to 2023 as we
have completed the AHFIRM trial and are evaluating our research and development spending plans.
Research and development expenses associated with our major development programs were as follows (in thousands):
Larsucosterol
Depot injectable programs
Other
Total research and development expenses
Larsucosterol
Year Ended December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
26,246 $
320
2,785
29,351 $
34,048
1,588
1,226
36,862
Our research and development expenses for larsucosterol decreased to $26.2 million in 2023 from $34.0 million in 2022,
primarily due to lower clinical trial related expenses as we substantially completed the AHFIRM trial, and experienced lower
contract manufacturing expenses and lower employee-related costs for this drug candidate compared with 2022.
Depot injectable programs
Our research and development expenses for depot injectable programs decreased to $320,000 in 2023 from $1.6 million in
2022 primarily due to lower employee-related costs and lower outside expenses for these programs.
Other DURECT research programs
Our research and development expenses for all other research activities increased to $2.8 million in 2023 from $1.2 million
in 2022, primarily due to higher employee-related costs and higher outside expenses associated with these programs compared
with 2022.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had 27 and 42 research and development employees, respectively.
Our research and development programs may span as many as ten years or more, and estimation of completion dates or
costs to complete are highly speculative and subjective due to numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing
pharmaceutical products, including significant and changing government regulation, uncertainties of future preclinical and clinical
study results, uncertainties with our
76
collaborators’ commitment to and progress in the programs and uncertainties associated with process development and
manufacturing as well as sales and marketing. In addition, with respect to our development programs subject to third-party
collaborations, the timing and expenditures to complete the programs are subject to the control of our collaborators. Therefore,
we cannot reasonably estimate the timing and costs of the efforts necessary to complete the research and development
programs. For additional information regarding these risks and uncertainties, see “Risk Factors” above.
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses are primarily comprised of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation
associated with finance, legal, business development, sales and marketing (including sales and marketing expenses for our
ALZET product line) and other administrative personnel, overhead and facility costs, and other general and administrative costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $14.4 million and $15.9 million in 2023 and 2022, respectively. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.5 million in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to lower patent
expenses as well as lower employee expenses in 2023 compared with 2022. Stock-based compensation recognized related to
selling, general and administrative personnel was $1.4 million and $1.2 million in 2023 and 2022, respectively. We expect our
selling, general and administrative expenses to decrease in 2024 compared to 2023 due to lower patent expenses and lower
employee expenses in 2024.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had 23 and 26 selling, general and administrative personnel, respectively.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest and other income
Interest and other income were $2.1 million in both 2023 and 2022, respectively. Excluding a $1.25 million settlement
payment received from a former collaborator in 2022, interest and other income in 2023 was higher than 2022 as a result of
higher interest rates associated with our cash and investments in 2023 compared with 2022.
Interest expense
Interest expense was $2.8 million and $2.4 million in 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase in interest expense in 2023
compared to 2022 was primarily due to higher interest rates associated with the term loan with Oxford Finance in 2023 compared
to 2022.
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities
The fair value of warrant liabilities was $1.2 million and zero at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The change in
fair value of warrant liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2023 was comprised of a non-cash gain of $1.6 million for the
pre-funded warrants issued in February 2023, a non-cash gain of $7.2 million for the common warrants issued in February 2023
and a non-cash gain of $4.9 million for the common warrants issued in July 2023. There were no warrants issued during the year
ended December 31, 2022.
Issuance cost for warrants
The issuance cost for warrants was $1.6 million and zero during the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The issuance cost for warrants during the year ended December 31, 2023 was comprised of $1.2 million for the warrants issued
in February 2023 and $427,000 for the common warrants issued in July 2023.
Loss on issuance of warrants
Loss on issuance of warrants was $2.0 million and zero during the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The loss on issuance of warrants during the year ended December 31, 2023 was comprised of $2.0 million for the warrants issued
in February 2023.
77
Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2023, we had net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of
approximately $312.6 million, of which approximately $224.0 million will expire in the years 2024 through 2037, and
approximately $88.6 million will not expire under current tax laws. As of December 31, 2022, we had federal research and
development tax credits of approximately $19.0 million, which expire at various dates beginning in 2024 through 2043, if not
utilized. As of December 31, 2023, we had NOL carryforwards for state income tax purposes of approximately $266.2 million,
which expire in the years 2024 through 2043, and state research and development tax credits of approximately $18.5 million,
which do not expire under current tax laws. Utilization of the NOLs may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to
federal and state ownership change limitations. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of NOLs and credits before
utilization.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had net deferred tax assets of $123.4 million and $117.6 million, respectively.
Deferred tax assets reflect the net tax effects of NOLs and credit carryforwards and the temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. Accordingly, the net
deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance.
Because realization of such tax benefits is uncertain, we provided a 100% valuation allowance as of December 31, 2023
and 2022. Utilization of the NOL and R&D credits carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to
ownership change limitations that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future provided by Sections 382 and 383 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as well as similar state and foreign provisions. These ownership changes may
limit the amount of NOL and R&D credits carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax,
respectively. In general, an ownership change is defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a
three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research and
development credit carryforwards) to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. Since our formation, we
have raised capital through the issuance of capital stock on several occasions which, combined with the purchasing shareholders’
subsequent disposition of those shares, may have resulted in a change of control, as defined by Section 382, or could result in a
change of control in the future upon subsequent disposition. We issued $60.0 million of convertible notes in 2003 and
subsequently all of these notes had been converted as of December 31, 2008 into approximately 1.9 million shares of our
common stock. We also issued approximately 440,000 shares of our common stock to an institutional investor in connection with
an equity financing in September 2009. In December 2012, November 2013, April 2016, June 2019 and February 2021, we
completed underwritten public offerings in which we sold an aggregate of approximately 1.4 million, 820,000, 1.4 million, 2.9
million and 2.0 million shares, respectively, of our common stock pursuant to effective registration statements. In 2016, 2017,
2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, we issued approximately 520,000, 890,000, 960,000, 230,000, 530,000, 95,000, 3,000
and 1.6 million shares, respectively, of our common stock in the open market through Controlled Equity Offering sales
agreements with Cantor Fitzgerald pursuant to effective registration statements. In 2023, we completed two registered direct
offerings by selling an aggregate of approximately 4.7 million shares of common stock and accompanying warrants to purchase
an aggregate of approximately 5.3 million shares of common stock. These transactions may also have resulted in a change of
control as defined by Section 382 or could result in a change of control in the future upon the subsequent disposition of the
shares.
We have not currently completed a study to assess whether a change in control has occurred or whether there have been
multiple changes of control since our formation due to the significant complexity and cost associated with such a study and the
fact that there could be additional changes in the future. If we have experienced a change of control at any time since our
formation, utilization of our NOL or R&D credits carryforwards would be subject to an annual limitation under Sections 382 and
383 which is determined by first multiplying the value of our stock at the time of the ownership change by the
78
applicable long-term tax-exempt rate, and then could be subject to additional adjustments, as required. Any limitation may result
in expiration of a portion of our NOL or R&D credits carryforwards before utilization. Tax years 2000 to 2023 remain subject to
future examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which we are subject to tax.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception in 1998, we have generally had a history of operating losses and we expect to continue to incur
significant operating losses for the foreseeable future and may never become profitable. These losses have resulted primarily
from costs incurred to research and develop our product candidates and, to a lesser extent, from selling, general and
administrative costs associated with our operations and product sales. We had cash, cash equivalents and investments totaling
$29.8 million at December 31, 2023, which includes $150,000 of interest-bearing marketable securities classified as restricted
investments on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 as compared to cash, cash equivalents and investments totaling
$43.6 million at December 31, 2022. At December 31, 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $589.0 million.
Our cash and investments policy emphasizes liquidity and preservation of principal over other portfolio considerations. We
select investments that maximize interest income to the extent possible given these two constraints. We satisfy liquidity
requirements by investing excess cash in securities with different maturities to match projected cash needs and limit
concentration of credit risk by diversifying our investments among a variety of high credit-quality issuers.
As discussed below, we do not have sufficient cash resources to fund our planned operations, existing debt and contractual
commitments and planned capital expenditures. Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. Unless we secure additional
equity or debt financing, of which there can be no assurance, we may not be able to continue operations.
Cash Flows
We used $34.4 million and $26.3 million of cash in operating activities in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022,
respectively. Our cash provided by or used in operating activities differs from our net loss in part due to the timing and
recognition of upfront payments under collaborative agreements. Depending on the nature of the upfront payments received
upon execution of collaborative agreements, which can either be recognized as revenue upfront in full or primarily recorded as
deferred revenue and generally recognized over the period using a basis that best reflects the satisfaction of our performance
obligations with the third-party collaborator pursuant to the applicable agreement. The increase in cash used in operating
activities in 2023 compared to 2022 was primarily due to lower payments from our collaborators in 2023. We received
approximately $2.0 million and $13.3 million under the agreement with Innocoll in 2023 and 2022, respectively. The cash used in
operations was primarily to fund operations as well as our working capital requirements, partially offset by the changes in
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
We used $1.2 million of cash from investing activities and generated $19.8 million of cash from investing activities in the
years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The decrease in cash generated from investing activities in 2023 was
primarily due to a decrease in proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities, partially offset by an increase in
purchases of available-for-sale securities in 2023 compared with 2022.
We generated $20.5 million and $83,000 of cash from financing activities in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022,
respectively. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2023 was primarily due to cash proceeds received from the
registered direct offerings that were completed in February 2023 and in July 2023 and from the sale of our common stock in the
open market under the 2021 Sales Agreement, partially offset by principal payments on the term loan with Oxford Finance LLC
("Oxford Finance").
79
Shelf Registration Statement
In July 2021, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC (the “2021 Registration Statement”) (File No.
333-258333), which upon being declared effective in August 2021, terminated our registration statement filed in August 2018
(File No. 333-226518) and allowed us to offer up to $250.0 million of securities from time to time in one or more public offerings,
inclusive of up to $75.0 million of shares of our common stock which we may sell, subject to certain limitations, pursuant to the
2021 Sales Agreement. The 2021 Sales Agreement replaced a prior 2015 Sales Agreement.
In 2023, we raised net proceeds (net of commissions) of approximately $1.6 million from the sale of our common stock in
the open market under the 2021 Sales Agreement. From February 1, 2024 to March 26, 2024, we raised net proceeds (net of
commissions) of approximately $648,000 from the sale of our common stock in the open market under the 2021 Sales
Agreement.
As of March 26, 2024, we had up to $222.7 million of our securities available for sale under the 2021 Registration
Statement, of which $72.7 million of our common stock are available pursuant to the 2021 Sales Agreement.
Any material sales in the public market of our common stock, under the 2021 Sales Agreement or otherwise under the 2021
Registration Statement, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.
Term Loan
In July 2016, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the "Loan Agreement") with Oxford Finance LLC
("Oxford Finance"), pursuant to which Oxford Finance provided a $20.0 million secured single-draw term loan to us with an initial
maturity date of August 1, 2020. The term loan was fully drawn at close and the proceeds were used for working capital and
general business requirements. Following five amendments, we made interest only payments under the amended Loan
Agreement until June 1, 2023, and are making consecutive monthly payments of principal and interest in arrears to be paid
through September 1, 2025, the final maturity date of the term loan. The Loan Agreement provides for a floating interest rate
(7.95% initially and 12.75% as of December 31, 2023) based on an index rate plus a spread and an additional payment equal to
10% of the principal amount of the term loan, which is due when the term loan becomes due or upon the prepayment of the
facility. If we elect to prepay the term loan, there is also a prepayment fee between 0.75% and 2.5% of the principal amount of
the term loan depending on the timing of prepayment. Our debt repayment obligations under the Loan Agreement may prove a
burden to the Company as they become due, particularly following the expiration of the interest-only period.
The term loan is secured by substantially all of our assets, except that the collateral does not include any intellectual
property (including licensing, collaboration and similar agreements relating thereto), and certain other excluded assets. The Loan
Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by us, which covenants limit our ability to convey, sell,
lease, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of certain assets; engage in any business other than the businesses currently
engaged in by us or reasonably related thereto; liquidate or dissolve; make certain management changes; undergo certain
change of control events; create, incur, assume, or be liable with respect to certain indebtedness; grant certain liens; pay
dividends and make certain other restricted payments; make certain investments; and make payments on any subordinated
debt.
80
The Loan Agreement also contains customary indemnification obligations and customary events of default, including,
among other things, our failure to fulfill certain obligations under the 2016 Loan Agreement and the occurrence of a material
adverse change which is defined as a material adverse change in our business, operations, or condition (financial or otherwise), a
material impairment of the prospect of repayment of any portion of the term loan, or a material impairment in the perfection or
priority of lender’s lien in the collateral or in the value of such collateral. In the event of default by us under the 2016 Loan
Agreement, the lender would be entitled to exercise its remedies thereunder, including the right to accelerate the debt, upon
which we may be required to repay all amounts then outstanding under the Loan Agreement. As a result, the term loan was
reclassified to current liabilities from non-current liabilities on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 and December 31,
2022 due to recurring losses, liquidity concerns and a subjective acceleration clause in the Loan Agreement.
Going Concern
As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately $29.8 million in cash, cash equivalents and investments. In 2023, we
received approximately $22.7 million in net proceeds (net of placement agent fees and other offering expenses) from two
registered direct offerings and we raised net proceeds (net of commissions) of approximately $1.6 million from the sale of our
common stock in the open market under the 2021 Sales Agreement.
In accordance with ASU No. 2014-15 Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (subtopic 205-40), our
management evaluates whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. Based on our
evaluation, substantial doubt exists regarding our ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the
issuance of our financial statements.
Cash used in our operating activities is heavily influenced by the timing and structure of new corporate collaborations.
While one feature of our business strategy is seeking new corporate collaborations, assuming no new collaborations and no
milestone payments, we anticipate that cash used in operating activities will decrease in the near term. In 2023, there were no
significant changes in our commercial commitments and contractual obligations. In aggregate, we are required to make future
payments pursuant to our existing contractual obligations as follows (in thousands):
Contractual Obligations
Term loan (1)
Operating lease obligations
Total contractual cash obligations
2024
2025
2026 and
thereafter
$
$
8,571 $
1,483
10,054 $
8,429 $
1,401
9,830 $
— $
2,102
2,102 $
Total
17,000
4,986
21,986
(1)
Includes principal, interest and final payments and assumes no acceleration of obligations.
Presently, we do not have sufficient cash resources to fund our planned operations, existing debt and contractual
commitments and planned capital expenditures through at least the next 12 months from issuance of these financial statements.
We may consume available resources more rapidly than currently anticipated, resulting in the need for additional funding. We
expect to incur continuing losses and negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future.
We may decide to raise additional capital through a variety of sources in the short-term and in the long-term, including but
not limited to:
•
•
the public equity markets;
private equity financings;
81
•
•
•
collaborative arrangements;
asset sales; and/or
public or private debt.
There can be no assurance that we will enter into additional collaborative agreements or maintain existing collaborative
agreements, will earn collaborative revenues or that additional capital will be available on favorable terms to the Company, if at
all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to significantly reduce or re-focus our operations or to obtain funds
through arrangements that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our products, technologies or potential markets,
either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. To the extent
that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities would
result in ownership dilution to our existing stockholders (assuming convertible debt securities were converted into shares). These
factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our inability to obtain required funding in the
near future or our inability to obtain funding on favorable terms will have a material adverse effect on our operations and
strategic development plan for future growth. If we cannot successfully raise additional capital and implement our strategic
development plan, our liquidity, financial condition and business prospects will be materially and adversely affected, and we may
have to cease operations.
As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our
financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2023.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” – “Recent Accounting Pronouncements”, to our financial
statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated
effects on financial condition and results of operations, which is incorporated herein by reference.
82
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio and to our term loan.
Fixed rate securities and borrowings may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to fluctuations in interest rates,
while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall and floating rate borrowings may lead
to additional interest expense if interest rates increase. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short
of expectations due to changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities which have
declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. Our interest expense on the term loan may rise if the interest rates
increase.
Our primary investment objective is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly
increasing risk. Our portfolio includes money markets funds, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate debt, and U.S.
government agencies. The diversity of our portfolio helps us to achieve our investment objectives. As of December 31, 2023, 95%
of our investment portfolio was composed of investments maturing less than 90 days from the date of purchase.
The following table presents the amounts of our cash equivalents and investments that may be subject to interest rate risk
and the average interest rates as of December 31, 2023 by year of maturity (dollars in thousands):
Cash equivalents:
Fixed rate
Average fixed rate
Variable rate
Average variable rate
Short-term investments:
Fixed rate
Average fixed rate
Restricted investments:
Fixed rate
Average fixed rate
Total investment securities
Average rate
2024
951
5.26 %
23,602
5.61 %
1,280
5.46 %
150
0.11 %
25,983
5.33 %
$
$
$
$
$
As of December 31, 2023, the fair value of our term loan was estimated to be $16.7 million. The Loan Agreement provides
for interest only payments through June 1, 2023, followed by consecutive monthly payments of principal and interest in arrears
starting on June 1, 2023 and continuing through the maturity date of the term loan of September 1, 2025. The Loan Agreement
provides for a floating interest rate (7.95% initially and 12.75% as of December 31, 2023) based on an index rate plus a spread.
In addition, a payment equal to 10% of the principal amount of the term loan is due when the term loan becomes due or upon the
prepayment of the facility. If the Company elects to prepay the loan, there is also a prepayment fee of between 0.75% and 2.5%
of the principal amount of the term loan depending on the timing of prepayment. The obligation under the term loan is subject to
interest rate risk because the interest rates under the obligation may exceed current interest rates.
83
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
DURECT CORPORATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 42)
Balance Sheets
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Financial Statements
84
Page No.
85
88
89
90
91
92
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of DURECT Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of DURECT Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and
2022, the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In
our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December
31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit as well as negative cash flows from
operating activities and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's evaluation of the events and conditions and management’s plans regarding these matters are also described in
Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement,
whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
85
Critical audit matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements
that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures
that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The
communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and
we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the
accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Description of the Matter
How We Addressed the Matter
in Our Audit
Accrued clinical costs
At December 31, 2023, the Company had $1,578 thousand in accrued clinical costs. As described
in Note 1 of the financial statements, the Company incurs significant costs associated with third-
party service providers for its clinical trials. The Company is required to estimate periodically the
cost of services rendered but unbilled. Estimates are determined each reporting period by
reviewing the terms and conditions of the underlying contracts, reviewing open purchase orders
and by having detailed discussions with internal clinical personnel and third-party service
providers as to the nature and status of the services performed in relation to amounts billed. The
costs for unbilled services are estimated by applying the rates and fees applicable in the
underlying contracts.
Auditing management’s accounting for accrued clinical costs was especially challenging as
evaluating the nature and status of the services performed under the Company’s clinical
agreements in relation to amounts billed was dependent upon the accumulation of a high volume
of information from internal clinical personnel and third-party service providers.
Our audit procedures included, among others, obtaining an understanding of accrued clinical
costs by performing a fluctuation analysis over the accrued clinical costs, gaining an
understanding of key movements against our expectations, reviewing significant agreements in
place with the Company’s third-party clinical service providers, performing inquiries with
management to verify the nature and status of the services performed, confirming applicable
information directly with third-party clinical service providers, including: total amounts invoiced
during the year, estimated unbilled amounts, unpaid amounts, patient enrollment status for
clinical sites at December 31, 2023 and the terms and conditions of the underlying contracts. Our
procedures also included vouching significant accrued clinical costs at December 31, 2023 to
subsequent cash disbursements and tracing a sample of subsequent cash disbursements to
related invoices received by the Company to verify whether they were appropriately included or
excluded from the accrued clinical costs balance.
86
Description of the Matter
How We Addressed the Matter
in Our Audit
Initial accounting for the February 2023 pre-funded and common warrants
As described in Note 9 to the financial statements, in February 2023, the Company issued pre-
funded warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock and common warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of common stock in connection with a securities
purchase agreement. The pre-funded and common warrants were accounted for as current
liabilities on the balance sheet based on their estimated fair values of $1.7 million and $10.3
million as of February 8, 2023 (i.e., the issuance date), respectively. The Company calculated the
initial estimated fair value of the pre-funded warrants using a Black-Scholes option pricing model
and the initial estimated fair value of the common warrants using a Monte Carlo simulation
model.
Auditing the Company’s initial accounting and valuation for the February 2023 pre-funded and
common warrants was especially challenging with respect to the evaluation of the terms and
conditions of the securities purchase agreement in relation to the applicable accounting
guidance, as well as the reasonableness of management’s methodologies and related
assumptions for the estimation of the initial fair value of the pre-funded and common warrants,
including the likelihood of achieving certain clinical events and related impact on the Company's
common stock price.
Our audit procedures included, among others, reviewing the related securities purchase
agreement, assessing management’s application of the appropriate accounting guidance, such
as the determination that both the pre-funded and common warrants were required to be
presented as current liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet, and evaluating the Company's
use of appropriate valuation methodologies with support from a valuation specialist. Our audit
procedures over the most significant assumptions, including the likelihood of achieving certain
clinical events and related impact on the Company's common stock price, involved performing a
sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of changes on the estimated fair value and comparing
the assumptions to external industry data.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1998.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Francisco, California
March 28, 2024
87
DURECT CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
December 31,
2023
2022
$
28,400 $
1,280
A S S E T S
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $20 at December 31, 2023
and $21 at December 31, 2022)
Inventories, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Property and equipment, net
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Goodwill
Long-term restricted investments
Other long-term assets
Total assets
L I A B I L I T I E S A N D S T O C K H O L D E R S’ E Q U I T Y
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Term loan, current portion, net
Operating lease liabilities, current portion
Warrant liabilities
Total current liabilities
Operating lease liabilities, non-current portion
Other long-term liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 10,000 shares authorized; none issued
and outstanding
Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 150,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2023 and 2022,
respectively; 30,334 and 22,785 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023 and 2022,
respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated deficit
Stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
$
$
43,483
—
3,423
2,113
2,375
51,394
188
1,943
6,169
150
256
60,100
3,106
7,896
21,170
1,832
—
34,004
260
851
1,261
2,219
1,511
34,671
91
3,980
6,169
150
128
45,189 $
1,777 $
5,966
16,663
1,381
1,224
27,011
2,702
693
—
—
23
603,780
(14 )
(589,006 )
14,783
45,189 $
23
586,357
(13 )
(561,382 )
24,985
60,100
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
88
DURECT CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Collaborative research and development and other revenue
Product revenue, net
Total revenues
Operating expenses:
Cost of product revenues
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Total operating expenses
Loss from operations
Other income (expense):
Interest and other income
Interest and other expenses
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities
Issuance cost for warrants
Loss on issuance of warrants
Other income (expense), net
Net loss
Net change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification
adjustments and taxes
Total comprehensive loss
Net loss per share
Basic
Diluted
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
2,277 $
6,271
8,548
13,204
$
6,079
19,283
1,717
29,351
14,364
45,432
(36,884 )
2,129
(2,792 )
13,583
(1,627 )
(2,033 )
9,260
(27,624 )
1,588
36,862
15,915
54,365
(35,082 )
2,148
(2,399 )
—
—
—
(251 )
(35,333 )
(1 )
(3 )
$
(27,625 ) $
(35,336 ) $
6,331
7,646
13,977
1,955
31,846
14,449
48,250
(34,273 )
156
(2,148 )
—
—
—
(1,992 )
(36,265 )
(5 )
(36,270 )
$
$
(1.05 ) $
(1.20 ) $
(1.55 ) $
(1.55 ) $
(1.61 )
(1.61 )
Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss per share
Basic
Diluted
26,256
26,520
22,777
22,777
22,505
22,505
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
89
DURECT CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2020
20,353
$
20
$
529,884
$
(5 ) $
(489,784 ) $
40,115
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (loss)
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of
stock options and purchases of ESPP shares
Issuance of common stock upon equity
financings, net of issuance costs of $395
Stock-based compensation expense from stock
options and ESPP shares
Net loss
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
283
2,132
—
—
—
1
2
—
—
—
3,586
47,658
2,690
—
—
Balance at December 31, 2021
22,768
$
23
$
583,818
$
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of
stock options and purchases of ESPP shares
Issuance of common stock upon equity
financings, net of issuance costs of $0
Stock-based compensation expense from stock
options and ESPP shares
Net loss
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
14
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
59
25
2,455
—
—
Balance at December 31, 2022
22,785
$
23
$
586,357
$
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of
stock options and purchases of ESPP shares
Issuance of common stock in the February
2023 registered direct offering
Issuance of common stock in the July 2023
registered direct offering, net of issuance costs
of $673
Issuance of common stock pursuant to the
2021 Sales Agreement, net of issuance costs of
$32
Issuance of common stock upon warrant
exercises
Stock-based compensation expense from stock
options and ESPP shares
Net loss
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
Balance at December 31, 2023
11
1,700
2,991
1,623
1,224
—
—
—
30,334
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
23
$
34
—
8,540
1,564
3,013
4,272
—
—
603,780
$
—
—
—
—
(5 )
(10 ) $
—
—
—
—
(3 )
(13 ) $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1 )
(14 )
$
—
—
—
(36,265 )
—
(526,049 ) $
—
—
—
(35,333 )
—
(561,382 ) $
—
—
—
—
—
—
(27,624 )
—
(589,006 )
$
3,587
47,660
2,690
(36,265 )
(5 )
57,782
59
25
2,455
(35,333 )
(3 )
24,985
34
—
8,540
1,564
3,013
4,272
(27,624 )
(1 )
14,783
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
90
DURECT CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
(27,624 )
$
(35,333 )
$
(36,265 )
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
Gain (loss) on sale of equipment
Depreciation and accretion
Stock-based compensation
Amortization of debt issuance cost
Net accretion/amortization on investments
Changes in operating lease liabilities
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities
Loss on issuance of warrants
Issuance cost for warrants
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Deferred revenue
Total adjustments
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities
Net proceeds from sale of LACTEL product line
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Payments on equipment financing obligations
Payments on term loan principal
Net proceeds from issuances of common stock pursuant to the 2018 & 2021 Sales
Agreement
Net proceeds from issuances of common stock upon exercise of
stock options, and purchases of ESPP shares
Proceeds from issuances of warrants and common stock in the February 2023 registered
direct offering
Net proceeds from issuances of warrants and common stock in the July 2023 registered
direct offering
Term loan amendment cost
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of the
period (1)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of the period (1)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest
$
$
112
31
2,538
439
(83 )
(46 )
(13,583 )
2,033
427
2,162
(107 )
796
(1,329 )
(180 )
—
(6,790 )
(34,414 )
(52 )
84
(6,198 )
5,000
—
—
(1,166 )
(1 )
(5,000 )
1,564
34
10,000
13,900
—
20,497
(15,083 )
—
119
2,457
479
16
(77 )
—
—
—
3,054
(245 )
1,210
1,795
1,155
(910 )
9,053
(26,280 )
(111 )
—
—
19,947
—
—
19,836
(1 )
—
25
59
—
—
—
83
(6,361 )
43,633
28,550 $
49,994
43,633 $
(11
)
288
2,688
451
(76 )
(22 )
—
—
—
(5,440 )
(4 )
965
(367 )
384
98
(1,046 )
(37,311 )
(194 )
—
(52,298 )
48,830
3,994
14,979
15,311
(2 )
—
47,660
3,587
—
—
(713 )
50,532
28,532
21,462
49,994
2,332 $
1,800 $
1,617
(1) Includes restricted cash of $150,000 (presented as long-term restricted investments) on the balance sheets at each of
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
91
DURECT CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
DURECT Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 6, 1998. The Company is a
biopharmaceutical company committed to transforming the treatment of acute organ injury and chronic liver diseases by
advancing novel and potentially lifesaving therapies based on its endogenous epigenetic regulator program. Larsucosterol, the
Company's lead drug candidate, binds to and inhibits the activity of DNA methyltransferases ("DNMTs"), epigenetic enzymes
which are elevated and associated with hypermethylation found in alcohol-associated hepatitis ("AH") patients. Larsucosterol is in
clinical development for the potential treatment of AH, for which FDA has granted a Fast Track Designation; metabolic
dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (“MASH”), also known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or NASH is also being explored. In
addition, POSIMIR® (bupivacaine solution) for infiltration use, a non-opioid analgesic utilizing the innovative SABER® platform
technology, is FDA-approved and has been exclusively licensed to Innocoll Pharmaceuticals for commercialization in the United
States. The Company also manufactures and sells osmotic pumps used in laboratory research, and manufactures certain
excipients for certain clients for use as raw materials in their products.
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP). The preparation of the accompanying Financial Statements conforms to U.S. GAAP, which requires management to
make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates including, but not limited to, those
related to revenue recognition, the period of performance, identification of performance obligations and evaluation of milestones
with respect to our collaborations, the amounts of revenues, recoverability of inventory, certain accrued liabilities including
accrued clinical costs, asset retirement obligations, and valuation of warrant liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience and on various other market-specific and other relevant assumptions that the Company believes to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Reverse Stock Split
On December 5, 2022, the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock. The reverse
stock split also affected the Company's outstanding stock options, purchase rights and equity incentive plans and resulted in the
shares underlying such instruments being reduced and the exercise price being increased proportionately.
For all financial statement periods presented, references to number of shares, net loss per share, stock price and exercise
price have been conformed to reflect the effects of the Company’s 1-for-10 reverse stock split, effective December 5, 2022,
unless otherwise specified herein.
Liquidity and Need to Raise Additional Capital
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $589.0 million as well as negative cash flows from
operating activities. Presently, the Company does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its plans for the next twelve months
following the issuance of these financial statements. The Company will continue to require substantial funds to continue research
and development, including clinical trials of its product candidates. These factors raise substantial doubt
92
regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the issuance of these financial
statements. Management’s plans in order to meet its operating cash flow requirements include seeking additional collaborative
agreements for certain of its programs as well as financing activities such as public offerings and private placements of its
common stock, preferred stock offerings, issuances of debt and convertible debt instruments.
There are no assurances that such additional funding will be obtained and that the Company will succeed in its future
operations. If the Company cannot successfully raise additional capital and implement its strategic development plan, its
liquidity, financial condition and business prospects will be materially and adversely affected, and the Company may have to
cease operations. As further described in Note 8, the Company classified the remaining balance of its term loan as a current
liability on the Company’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 due to the timing of repayment obligations and due to
recurring losses, liquidity concerns and a subjective acceleration clause in the Company’s Loan Agreement. These financial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification
of assets and liabilities that may be necessary in the event the Company can no longer continue as a going concern.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase to be cash
equivalents. Investments with original maturities of greater than 90 days from the date of purchase but less than one year from
the balance sheet date are classified as short-term investments, while investments with maturities in one year or beyond one
year from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. Management determines the appropriate classification
of its cash equivalents and investment securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such determination as of each balance
sheet date. Management has classified the Company’s cash equivalents and investments as available-for-sale securities in the
accompanying financial statements. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Realized gains and losses are included in interest income.
There were no material realized gains or losses in the periods presented. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific
identification method.
The Company invests in debt instruments of government agencies, corporations, and money market funds with high credit
ratings. The Company has established guidelines regarding diversification of its investments and their maturities with the
objectives of maintaining safety and liquidity, while maximizing yield.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist principally of interest-bearing investments
and trade receivables. The Company maintains cash, cash equivalents and investments with various major financial institutions.
The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions. In addition, the
Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit quality of its investments.
Pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions account for a substantial portion of the Company’s trade receivables.
The Company provides credit in the normal course of business to its customers and collateral for these receivables is generally
not required. The risk associated with this concentration is limited to a certain extent due to the large number of accounts and
their geographic dispersion. The Company monitors the creditworthiness of its customers to which it grants credit terms in the
normal course of business. The Company maintains reserves for estimated credit losses and, to date, such losses have been
immaterial in all periods presented.
93
Customer and Product Line Concentrations
Revenue from the sale of products from the ALZET product line accounted for 70%, 31% and 46% of total revenue for
2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Indivior accounted for 20% of the Company's total revenue for 2023 and Innocoll accounted
for 52% and 37% of the Company’s total revenue for 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Total revenue by geographic region for the years 2023, 2022 and 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
United States
Europe
Japan
Others
Total
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
$
4,617 $
2,300
559
1,072
8,548 $
5,447 $
11,791
1,488
557
19,283 $
5,690
6,630
1,015
642
13,977
Revenue by geography is determined by the location of the customer.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. The
Company may be required to expense previously capitalized inventory costs upon a change in management’s judgment due to
new information that suggests that the inventory will not be saleable.
The Company’s inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
Raw materials
Work in-process
Finished goods
Total inventories
Property and Equipment
December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
165 $
1,164
890
2,219 $
168
1,151
794
2,113
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are
amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or the terms of the related leases,
whichever are shorter.
Goodwill
Goodwill is periodically assessed and evaluated for impairment. The Company operates in one operating segment and also
has only one reporting unit, which is the research, development and manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. The Company
assesses the impairment of goodwill at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. To date, the Company has not recorded any impairment charge related to goodwill.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment, intangible assets, and other long-term assets,
for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not
be fully recoverable.
If an indicator of impairment is present for any long-lived asset, the Company is required to determine whether the
undiscounted future cash flows from the long-lived asset is less than its carrying
94
amount. If so, impairment, if any, is calculated as the amount by which the long-lived asset's carrying value exceeds its
estimated fair value. Through December 31, 2023, there have been no material impairment losses.
Leases
ASC 842 requires the Company to recognize an operating lease right-of-use asset and corresponding operating lease
liability for the Company’s leased properties. The Company’s operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized
under ASC 842 based on the present value of lease payments over the remaining lease term at the lease commencement date.
In determining the net present value of lease payments, we estimate the incremental borrowing rate based on the information
available, including remaining lease term. As of December 31, 2023, the weighted-average remaining lease term was 3.48 years
for the Company’s leased properties.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based payments using a fair-value based method for costs related to all share-based
payments, including stock options and stock issued under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). The Company
estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company
recognizes compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period and accounts for forfeitures as they
occur. See Note 9 for further information regarding stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition
Product Revenue, Net
The Company manufactures and sells ALZET osmotic pumps used in laboratory research, and manufactures and sells
certain excipients used by pharmaceutical companies as raw materials in certain of their products, including POSIMIR, a marketed
animal health product and Methydur.
Revenues from product sales are recognized when the customer obtains control of the Company’s product, which occurs at
a point in time, typically upon shipment to the customer. The Company expenses incremental costs of obtaining a contract as
and when incurred if the expected amortization period of the asset that the Company would have recognized is one year or less.
Trade Discounts and Allowances: The Company provides certain customers with discounts that are explicitly stated in the
Company’s contracts and are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the period the related product revenue is recognized.
Product Returns: The Company generally offers customers a limited right of return for products that have been purchased.
The Company estimates the amount of its product sales that are probable of being returned by its customers and records this
estimate as a reduction of revenue in the period the related product revenue is recognized. The Company currently estimates
product return liabilities primarily using its historical sales information. The Company expects product returns to be minimal.
Collaborative Research and Development and Other Revenue
The Company enters into license agreements, under which it licenses certain rights to its product candidates or products to
third parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to the Company of one or more of the following: non-
refundable, up-front license fees; reimbursement of development costs incurred by the Company under approved work plans;
development, regulatory, intellectual property and commercial milestone payments; payments for manufacturing supply services
the Company provides itself or through its contract manufacturers; and royalties on net sales of licensed products. Each of these
payments results in collaborative research and development revenues, except for revenues from royalties on net sales of
licensed products and earn-out revenues, which are classified as other revenues.
95
In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under each of its
agreements, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii)
determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations including whether they are distinct in the
context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv)
allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company
satisfies each performance obligation. For arrangements that are determined to include multiple performance obligations, the
Company must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the estimated stand-alone selling price for each
performance obligation identified. These assumptions may include: forecasted revenues, development timelines, reimbursement
rates for personnel costs, discount rates and probabilities of technical and regulatory success. The Company expects to recognize
revenue for the variable consideration currently being constrained when it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not
occur.
Licenses of intellectual property: If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the
other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenues from the transaction price
allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the
license. For performance obligations comprised of licenses that are bundled with other promises, the Company utilizes its
judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance
obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the Company applies an appropriate method of measuring
progress for purposes of recognizing related revenues from the allocated transaction price. For performance obligations
recognized over time, the Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and recognizes revenues on a
cumulative catch-up basis as collaborative research and development revenues.
Milestone Payments: At the inception of each arrangement that includes development milestone payments, the Company
evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the
transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the
associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the
Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are
received. The transaction price is then allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis, for
which the Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. At the end of
each subsequent reporting period, the Company re-evaluates the probability of achievement of such development milestones
and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price.
Manufacturing Supply Services: Arrangements that include a promise for future supply of raw materials or drug product for
either clinical development or commercial supply at the customer’s discretion are generally considered as options. The Company
assesses if these options provide a material right to the customer and if so, they are accounted for as separate performance
obligations and allocated a portion of the transaction price based on the estimated standalone selling price of the material right.
If the Company is entitled to additional payments when the customer exercises these options, the deferred transaction price and
any additional payments are recorded in collaborative research and development revenue when the customer obtains control of
the goods.
96
Royalties and Earn-outs: For arrangements that include sales-based royalties or earn-outs, including milestone payments
based on first commercial sale or the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties
relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to
which some or all of the royalty or earn-out has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). To date, the Company
has not recognized material royalty revenue resulting from the Company’s collaborative arrangements or material earn-out
revenues from any of the Company’s agreements.
Research and development services: Revenue from research and development services that are determined to represent a
distinct performance obligation related to services performed under the collaborative arrangements with the Company’s third-
party collaborators is recognized over time as the related research and development services are performed using an appropriate
method of measuring progress. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and recognizes revenue
on a cumulative catch-up basis, as collaborative research and development revenue. Research and development expenses under
the collaborative research and development agreements generally approximate or exceed the revenue recognized under such
agreements over the term of the respective agreements. Deferred revenue may result when the Company does not expend the
required level of effort during a specific period in comparison to funds received under the respective agreement.
The Company receives payments from its customers based on development cost schedules established in each contract.
Up-front payments are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due and may require deferral of revenue recognition
to a future period until the Company performs its obligations under these arrangements. Amounts are recorded as accounts
receivable when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. The Company does not assess whether a contract has a
significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the
customer and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the customer will be one year or less.
Prepaid and Accrued Clinical Costs
The Company incurs significant costs associated with third party consultants and organizations for pre-clinical studies,
clinical trials, contract research, regulatory advice and other research and development-related services. The Company is
required to estimate periodically the cost of services rendered but unbilled based on management’s estimates. Estimates are
determined each reporting period by reviewing the terms and conditions of the underlying contracts, reviewing open purchase
orders and by having detailed discussions with internal clinical personnel and third-party service providers as to the nature and
status of the services performed in relation to amounts billed. The costs for unbilled services are estimated by applying the rates
and fees applicable in the underlying contracts. If these good faith estimates are inaccurate, actual expenses incurred could
materially differ from these estimates.
Prepaid and Accrued Manufacturing Costs
The Company incurs significant costs associated with third party consultants and organizations for manufacturing,
validation, testing and other research and development-related services. The Company is required to estimate periodically the
cost of services rendered but unbilled based on management’s estimates. Estimates are determined each reporting period by
reviewing the terms and conditions of the underlying contracts, reviewing open purchase orders and by having detailed
discussions with internal personnel and third-party service providers as to the nature and status of the services performed in
relation to amounts billed. The costs for unbilled services are estimated by applying the rates and fees applicable in the
underlying contracts. If these good faith estimates are inaccurate, actual expenses incurred could materially differ from these
estimates.
97
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses are primarily comprised of salaries and benefits associated with research and
development personnel, overhead and facility costs, preclinical and non-clinical development costs, clinical trial and related
clinical manufacturing costs, contract services, and other outside costs. Research and development costs are expensed as
incurred. Research and development costs paid to third parties under sponsored research agreements are recognized as the
related services are performed. In addition, research and development expenses incurred that are reimbursed by the Company’s
partners are recorded as collaborative research and development revenue.
Comprehensive Loss
Components of other comprehensive loss are comprised entirely of unrealized gains and losses on the Company’s
available-for-sale securities for all periods presented. Total comprehensive loss has been disclosed in the Company’s Statements
of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Segment Reporting
The Company operates in one operating segment, which is the research, development and manufacturing of
pharmaceutical products.
Common Stock Warrants
The Company accounts for its common stock warrants in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
("ASC 480") and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). Based upon the provisions of ASC 480 and ASC 815, the
Company accounts for common stock warrants and pre-funded warrants as current liabilities if the warrant fails the equity
classification criteria. Common stock warrants and pre-funded warrants classified as liabilities are initially recorded at fair value
on the grant date and remeasured at each balance sheet date with the offsetting adjustments recorded in change in fair value of
warrant liabilities within the statements of operations.
The Company values its pre-funded warrants and common stock warrants classified as liabilities using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model or other acceptable valuation models, including the Monte-Carlo simulation model.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and
common stock equivalents (i.e., options to purchase common stock) outstanding during the period, if dilutive, using the treasury
stock method for options.
98
The numerators and denominators in the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share were as follows (in thousands
except per share amounts):
Basic loss per share computation:
Net loss
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic
Net loss per share - basic
Diluted loss per share computation:
Net loss
Change in fair value of pre-funded warrant liabilities
Change in fair value of common warrant liabilities
$
$
$
Net loss adjusted for change in fair value of warrant liabilities
$
Weighted average shares used to compute basic net loss per share
Dilutive effect of pre-funded warrants
Dilutive effect of common warrants
Year Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
(27,624 ) $
26,256
(1.05 ) $
(35,333 ) $
22,777
(1.55 ) $
(36,265 )
22,505
(1.61 )
(27,624 ) $
1,557
2,775
(31,956 ) $
(35,333 ) $
—
—
(35,333 ) $
26,256
168
96
22,777
—
—
(36,265 )
—
—
(36,265 )
22,505
—
—
22,505
(1.61 )
Weighted average shares used to compute diluted net loss per
share
Net loss per share - diluted
26,520
(1.20 ) $
22,777
(1.55 ) $
$
The computation of diluted net loss per share for 2023, 2022 and 2021 excludes the impact of options to purchase 3.4
million, 2.8 million and 834,000 shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, as
such impact would be anti-dilutive.
Shipping and Handling
Costs related to shipping and handling are included in cost of revenues for all periods presented.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2020, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other
Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) — Accounting for
Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity ("ASU- 2020-06"), which, among other things, provides guidance
on how to account for contracts on an entity’s own equity. This ASU simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments
with characteristics of liabilities and equity. Specifically, the ASU eliminated the need for the Company to assess whether a
contract on the entity’s own equity (1) permits settlement in unregistered shares, (2) whether counterparty rights rank higher
stockholder’s rights, and (3) whether collateral is required. In addition, the ASU requires incremental disclosure related to
contracts on the entity’s own equity and clarifies the treatment of certain financial instruments accounted for under this ASU on
earnings per share. This ASU may be applied on a full retrospective of modified retrospective basis. For smaller reporting
companies, this ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. The Company early adopted this standard on January 1, 2023 and the adoption did not have any effect on the financial
statements as the Company did not have any such outstanding instruments as of January 1, 2023.
99
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13 (ASU 2016-13) “Financial Instruments - Credit
Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-13 requires measurement and recognition of
expected credit losses for financial assets. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 for small
reporting companies, including interim reporting periods within those years and must be adopted using a modified retrospective
approach, with certain exceptions. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2023 and the
adoption did not have a material effect on the financial statements.
2.
Strategic Agreements
The collaborative research and development and other revenue associated with the Company’s major third-party
collaborators are as follows (in thousands):
Collaborator/Counterparty
Innocoll (1)
Other (2)
Total collaborative research and development and other revenue
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
$
7 $
2,270
2,277 $
10,015 $
3,189
13,204 $
4,100
2,231
6,331
(1)
(2)
The Company signed a license agreement with Innocoll on December 21, 2021, pursuant to which Innocoll agreed to pay a
nonrefundable upfront license fee of $4.0 million and $1.3 million primarily for the sale of manufacturing supplies and
excipients. In December 2021, upon the transfer of control of the license, the manufacturing supplies and excipients, and
equipment to Innocoll, the Company recognized $4.1 million as collaborative research and development and other revenue,
$1.1 million as product revenue, and a reduction of $0.1 million in net equipment. In the twelve months ended December
31, 2022, the Company recognized $8.0 million of patent milestone revenue and $2.0 million of first commercial sale
milestone revenue under the license agreement with Innocoll.
Includes: (a) amounts related to earn-out revenue from Indivior UK Limited ("Indivior") with respect to PERSERIS net sales;
(b) feasibility programs and research and development activities funded by our collaborators and (c) royalty revenue from
Orient Pharma Co., Ltd. (“Orient Pharma”) with respect to Methydur net sales.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had potential milestones of up to $122.0 million that the Company may receive in
the future under its collaborative arrangements, of which $10.0 million are development-based milestones, $2.0 million are
patent-based milestones and $110.0 million are sales-based milestones. Within the category of development-based milestones,
$10.0 million are related to regulatory approvals. In January 2023, the Company received a $2.0 million sales-based milestone
payment that was achieved and recognized in September 2022 for the first commercial sale of POSIMIR by Innocoll.
Agreement with Innocoll
On December 21, 2021, the Company entered into a license agreement (the “Innocoll Agreement”) with Innocoll
Pharmaceuticals Limited (“Innocoll”). Pursuant to the Innocoll Agreement, the Company has granted Innocoll an exclusive, royalty
bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop, manufacture and commercialize in the United States, POSIMIR®, the
Company’s FDA-approved post-surgical pain product, with respect to all uses and applications in humans. The Innocoll Agreement
provides for the assignment of the Company’s supply agreement with its contract manufacturing organization to Innocoll and also
provides Innocoll with the right, within the United States, to expand the approved indications of POSIMIR. The Company retains,
outside the United States, all of the global rights to POSIMIR.
100
Upon execution of the Innocoll Agreement, Innocoll paid the Company an initial nonrefundable, upfront fee of $4.0 million
as well as a fee in the amount of $1.3 million primarily to cover the manufacturing supplies and excipients and certain equipment
transferred to Innocoll pursuant to the terms of the Innocoll Agreement, and certain recently incurred Company expenses the
parties negotiated for Innocoll to reimburse. The Innocoll Agreement includes customary representations and warranties on
behalf of the Company and Innocoll, including representations as to the licensed intellectual property, regulatory matters and
compliance with applicable laws. The Innocoll Agreement also provides for certain mutual indemnities for breaches of
representations, warranties and covenants.
The Company also evaluated Innocoll’s future purchases of an excipient from the Company and concluded that these
purchases are option rights, and are at market rates, and do not constitute a material right performance obligation. As such,
these future purchases have been excluded from the allocation of transaction price and the Company will account for them as
separate contracts when and if Innocoll elects to issue purchase orders for the excipient.
During December 2021, the upfront fee of $4.0 million as well as a fee in the amount of $1.2 million to cover reimbursed
expenses, the manufacturing supplies and excipients transferred to Innocoll pursuant to the terms of the Innocoll Agreement was
recognized as revenue when the performance obligations were satisfied in December 2021 and $0.1 million was recorded as a
net reduction in equipment in December 2021. At December 31, 2021, the Company included $5.3 million due from Innocoll in
accounts receivable on its balance sheet; these funds were received in January 2022.
In August 2022, the Company was issued a new patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, extending U.S. patent
coverage of POSIMIR to at least 2041, resulting in an $8.0 million milestone payment by Innocoll to the Company. In September
2022, Innocoll launched POSIMIR in the U.S., triggering a $2.0 million milestone payment to the Company for the first commercial
sale of POSIMIR. Thus, the Company recognized $10.0 million of milestone revenue under the agreement with Innocoll in 2022. As
the commercial launch of POSIMIR progresses, the Company will receive tiered, low double-digit to mid-teen royalties on net
product sales of POSIMIR in the United States. The Company may earn additional milestone payments of up to $122.0 million in
the aggregate, depending on the achievement of certain regulatory, commercial, and intellectual property milestones with
respect to POSIMIR.
Patent Purchase Agreement with Indivior
In September 2017, we entered into an agreement with Indivior (the “Indivior Agreement”), under which we assigned to
Indivior certain patents that may provide further intellectual property protection for PERSERIS, Indivior’s extended-release
injectable suspension for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. In consideration for such assignment, Indivior made non-
refundable upfront and milestone payments to DURECT totaling $17.5 million. Additionally, under the terms of the agreement
with Indivior, the Company receives quarterly earn-out payments into 2026 that are based on a single digit percentage of U.S.
net sales of PERSERIS. Indivior commercially launched PERSERIS in the U.S. in February 2019. The Indivior Agreement contains
customary representations, warranties and indemnities of the parties. Amounts recognized during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 related to earn-out revenues from PERSERIS have been immaterial and are included in
collaborative research and development and other revenue.
101
3.
Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the
measurement date. The Company’s valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company follows a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value. These levels of inputs are
the following:
•
•
•
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value
of the assets or liabilities.
The Company’s financial instruments are valued using quoted prices in active markets or based upon other observable
inputs. The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of December 31, 2023 (in thousands):
Money market funds
Certificates of deposit
Commercial paper
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$
$
951 $
—
—
951 $
— $
150
24,882
25,032 $
— $
—
—
— $
951
150
24,882
25,983
The following table sets forth the fair value of our financial assets that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as
of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):
Money market funds
Certificates of deposit
Commercial paper
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$
$
633 $
—
—
633 $
— $
150
40,465
40,615 $
— $
—
—
— $
633
150
40,465
41,248
The Company’s financial instruments are valued using quoted prices in active markets or based upon other observable
inputs. Money market funds are classified as Level 1 financial assets. Certificates of deposit, commercial paper, municipal bonds,
corporate debt securities, and U.S. Government agency securities are classified as Level 2 financial assets. The fair value of the
Level 2 assets is estimated using pricing models using current observable market information for similar securities. The
Company’s Level 2 investments include U.S. government-backed securities and corporate securities that are valued based upon
observable inputs that may include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets,
benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research publications. The fair value of commercial paper
is based upon the time to maturity and discounted using the three-month treasury bill rate. The average remaining maturity of
the Company’s Level 2 investments as of December 31, 2023 is less than twelve months and these investments are rated by S&P
and Moody’s at AAA or AA- for securities and A1, A2, P1 or P2 for commercial paper.
102
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):
Money market funds
Certificates of deposit
Commercial paper
Reported as:
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
Long-term restricted investments
Money market funds
Certificates of deposit
Commercial paper
Reported as:
Cash and cash equivalents
Long-term restricted investments
December 31, 2023
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
Loss
Estimated
Fair
Value
951 $
150
24,896
25,997 $
24,566 $
1,281
150
25,997 $
— $
—
—
— $
— $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
(14 )
(14 ) $
(13 ) $
(1 )
—
(14 ) $
951
150
24,882
25,983
24,553
1,280
150
25,983
December 31, 2022
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
Loss
Estimated
Fair
Value
633 $
150
40,478
41,261 $
41,111 $
150
41,261 $
— $
—
—
— $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
(13 )
(13 ) $
(13 ) $
—
(13 ) $
633
150
40,465
41,248
41,098
150
41,248
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
The following is a summary of the cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2023, by
contractual maturity (in thousands):
Mature in one year or less
Mature after one year through five years
December 31, 2023
Amortized
Cost
$
$
24,896 $
150
25,046 $
Estimated
Fair
Value
24,882
150
25,032
There were no securities that have had an unrealized loss for more than 12 months as of December 31, 2023.
As of December 31, 2023, unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments are not attributed to credit risk and are
considered to be temporary. The Company believes that it is more-likely-than-not that investments in an unrealized loss position
will be held until maturity or the recovery of the cost basis of the investment. To date, the Company has not recorded any
impairment charges on marketable securities related to other-than-temporary declines in market value.
103
Warrant Liabilities
The following table summarizes the activity of the Company’s Level 3 warrant liabilities as of December 31, 2023 and 2022
(in thousands):
Fair value at beginning of period - February 2023 issuance (Pre-funded warrants)
Initial fair value at the original issuance date
Change in fair value during the period
Fair value of liability classified warrants exercised
Fair value at end of period - February 2023 issuance (Pre-funded warrants)
Fair value at beginning of period - February 2023 issuance (Common warrants)
Initial fair value at the original issuance date
Change in fair value during the period
Fair value of liability classified warrants exercised
Fair value at end of period - February 2023 issuance (Common warrants)
Fair value at end of period - February 2023 issuance
Fair value at beginning of period - July 2023 issuance
Initial fair value at the original issuance date
Change in fair value during the period
Fair value of liability classified warrants exercised
Fair value at end of period - July 2023 issuance
Total fair value at end of period
February 2023 Warrants
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
$
— $
1,743
(1,557 )
(186 )
— $
— $
10,290
(7,151 )
(2,827 )
312 $
312 $
— $
5,788
(4,876 )
—
912 $
1,224 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
In February 2023, the Company issued pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 300,000 shares of common stock
and common warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering.
Pre-Funded Warrants
The pre-funded warrants were accounted for as current liabilities on the balance sheet and were adjusted to estimated fair
value at period end through “other income (expense)” on the statement of operations. The estimated fair value of the
outstanding pre-funded warrants was $1.7 million and zero as of February 8, 2023 (i.e., the issuance date) and December 31,
2023, respectively. In November 2023, all 300,000 shares of the pre-funded warrants were exercised in accordance with the
financing agreement, resulting in an issuance of 300,000 shares of common stock to the holder. The Company calculated the
estimated fair value of the pre-funded warrants using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following key assumptions:
Common stock price
Exercise price per share
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Contractual term (in years)
Expected dividend yield
$
$
February 8, 2023 (issuance)
5.81
0.00001
86.60 %
3.82 %
5.00
— %
104
Common Warrants
The common warrants are accounted for as current liabilities on the balance sheet and are adjusted to estimated fair value
at period end through “other income (expense)” on the statement of operations. The estimated fair value of the outstanding
common warrants was $10.3 million and $312,000 as of February 8, 2023 (i.e., the issuance date) and December 31, 2023,
respectively. In September 2023, 1,400,000 shares of the common warrants were exercised through the alternative cashless
exercise provision in accordance with the financing agreement, resulting in a net issuance of 924,000 shares to the holder. The
aggregate number of shares of our common stock issuable in such alternative cashless exercise equals the product of (x) the
aggregate number of shares of our common stock that would be issuable upon exercise of the common warrant in accordance
with the terms of such common warrant if such exercise were by means of a cash exercise rather than a cashless exercise and
(y) 0.66. The Company calculated the estimated fair value of the common warrants using a Monte Carlo simulation model with
the following key assumptions. In all cases, the Company took the likelihood of achieving certain clinical events and related
impact on the Company's common stock price into account.
The exercise price for the outstanding common warrants (i.e., 600,000 shares) was adjusted down from $5.00 per share to
$0.52 per share as of December 31, 2023 as a result of an anti-dilution provision in the common warrants issued in the February
2023 financing that was triggered by the sale of our common stock in the open market in November 2023.
Common stock price
Exercise price per share
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Contractual term (in years)
Expected dividend yield
July 2023 warrants
$
$
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
—
—
— %
— %
—
— %
0.59 $
0.51 $
118.00 %
3.93 %
4.10
— %
In July 2023, the Company issued common warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,991,027 shares of common stock in a
registered direct offering.
The common warrants are accounted for as current liabilities on the balance sheet and are adjusted to estimated fair value
at period end through “other income (expense)” on the statement of operations. The estimated fair value of the outstanding
common warrants was $5.8 million and $912,000 as of July 21, 2023 (i.e., the issuance date) and December 31, 2023,
respectively. The Company calculated the estimated fair value of the common warrants using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following key assumptions:
Common stock price
Exercise price per share
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Contractual term (in years)
Expected dividend yield
$
$
December 31, 2023
0.59 $
4.89 $
115.60 %
3.88 %
4.60
— %
December 31, 2022
—
—
— %
— %
—
— %
There were no exercises of the common warrants issued in the July 2023 registered direct offering.
105
4.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
Equipment
Leasehold improvements
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
Property and equipment, net
December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
6,737 $
8,245
14,982
(14,891 )
91 $
10,791
8,490
19,281
(19,093 )
188
Depreciation expense was $148,000, $150,000 and $132,000 in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded $375,000 and $607,000, respectively, as a liability which was
included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities on its balance sheet for asset retirement obligations associated with
the estimated restoration cost for its leased buildings.
5.
Restricted Investments
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had $150,000 recorded as restricted investments, which primarily served
as collateral for letters of credit securing a leased facility in California.
6.
Commitments
Operating Leases
The Company has lease arrangements for its facilities in California as follows.
Location
Cupertino, CA
Approximate
Square Feet
30,149 sq. ft.
Operation
Office, Laboratory and
Manufacturing
Expiration
Lease expires 2027 (with an option to renew for an additional five
years)
Cupertino, CA
20,100 sq. ft.
Office and Laboratory
Lease expired in February 2024 and was not renewed
Vacaville, CA
24,634 sq. ft.
Manufacturing
Lease expires 2028 (with an option to renew for an additional five
years)
Under these leases, the Company is required to pay certain maintenance expenses in addition to monthly rent. Rent
expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term for leases that have scheduled rental payment increases. Rent
expense under all operating leases was $2.0 million, $1.9 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022
and 2021. In determining the net present value of lease payments, the Company used its incremental borrowing rate of 13.8%
based on the information available, including remaining lease term, at the adoption date of ASC 842. As of December 31, 2023
and 2022, the weighted-average remaining lease term was 3.48 years and 0.99 years, respectively, for the Company’s leased
properties.
106
Future minimum payments under these noncancelable leases are as follows (in thousands):
Year ending December 31,
2024
2025
2026
2027 and thereafter
Less present value adjustment
Operating lease liabilities recognized
Operating
Leases
1,483
1,401
1,443
659
4,986
(903 )
4,083
$
7.
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 were comprised as follows (in thousands):
Accrued compensation and benefits
Accrued clinical costs
Accrued contract research and manufacturing cost
Others
Total
8.
Term Loan
December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
1,320 $
1,578
2,340
728
5,966 $
3,970
1,966
861
1,099
7,896
In July 2016, the Company entered into a $20.0 million secured single-draw term loan (as amended, the “Loan Agreement”)
with Oxford Finance LLC (“Oxford Finance”). The Company and Oxford Finance entered into five subsequent amendments to the
Loan Agreement in February 2018, November 2018, December 2019, March 2021 and May 2021. For amendments 1-3 and 5, the
Company paid Oxford Finance loan modification fees of $100,000, $900,000, $825,000 and $712,500, respectively. As amended,
the Loan Agreement provides for interest only payments through June 1, 2023, followed by consecutive monthly payments of
principal and interest in arrears starting on June 1, 2023 and continuing through the maturity date of the term loan of September
1, 2025. The Loan Agreement provides for a floating interest rate (7.95% initially and 12.75% as of December 31, 2023) based on
an index rate plus a spread. In addition, a payment equal to 10% of the principal amount of the term loan is due when the term
loan becomes due or upon the prepayment of the facility. If the Company elects to prepay the loan, there is also a prepayment
fee of between 0.75% and 2.5% of the principal amount of the term loan depending on the timing of prepayment. The $150,000
facility fee that was paid at the original closing, the loan modification fees and other debt offering/issuance costs have been
recorded as debt discount on the Company’s balance sheets and together with the final $2.0 million payment are being
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the revised term of the loan. The Company made principal
payments of $5.0 million in 2023.
The term loan is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, except that the collateral does not include any
intellectual property (including licensing, collaboration and similar agreements relating thereto), and certain other excluded
assets. The Loan Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company, which covenants
limit the Company’s ability to convey, sell, lease, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of certain assets of the Company; engage
in any business other than the businesses currently engaged in by the Company or reasonably related thereto; liquidate or
dissolve; make certain management changes; undergo certain change of control events; create, incur, assume, or be liable with
respect to certain indebtedness; grant certain liens; pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments; make certain
investments; and make payments on any subordinated debt.
107
The Loan Agreement also contains customary indemnification obligations and customary events of default, including,
among other things, the Company’s failure to fulfill certain obligations of the Company under the Loan Agreement and the
occurrence of a material adverse change which is defined as a material adverse change in the Company’s business, operations,
or condition (financial or otherwise), a material impairment of the prospect of repayment of any portion of the loan, or a material
impairment in the perfection or priority of lender’s lien in the collateral or in the value of such collateral. In the event of default by
the Company under the Loan Agreement, the lender would be entitled to exercise its remedies thereunder, including the right to
accelerate the debt, upon which the Company may be required to repay all amounts then outstanding under the Loan
Agreement, which could harm the Company’s financial condition. The conditionally exercisable call option related to the event of
default is considered to be an embedded derivative which is required to be bifurcated and accounted for as a separate financial
instrument. In the periods presented, the value of the embedded derivative is not material, but could become material in future
periods if an event of default became more probable than is currently estimated.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company was in compliance with all material covenants under the Loan Agreement and
there had been no material adverse change. In accordance with ASC 470-10-45-2, the term loan was classified as a current
liability on the Company’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 due to the timing of repayment
obligations and due to recurring losses, liquidity concerns and a subjective acceleration clause in the Company’s Loan
Agreement.
The fair value of the term loan approximates the carrying value. Future maturities due under the term loan as of December
31, 2023, are as follows (in thousands):
2024
2025
Total minimum payments
Less unamortized debt discount and accrued final payment
Carrying value of term loan, net
8,571
8,429
17,000
(337 )
16,663
9.
Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock
In July 2021, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC (the “2021 Registration
Statement”) (File No. 333-258333), which upon being declared effective in August 2021, allows the Company to offer up to
$250.0 million of securities from time to time in one or more public offerings, inclusive of up to $75.0 million of shares of the
Company’s common stock which the Company may sell, subject to certain limitations, pursuant to a sales agreement dated July
30, 2021 with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (the “2021 Sales Agreement”).
On December 5, 2022, the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock. The reverse
stock split also affected our outstanding stock options, purchase rights and equity incentive plans and resulted in the shares
underlying such instruments being reduced and the exercise price being increased proportionately.
Registered Direct Offerings
February 2023 Financing
On February 3, 2023, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with two institutional investors relating to
the purchase and sale of an aggregate of (i) 1,700,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, (ii) pre-funded
warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock, and (iii) accompanying common warrants, to purchase an aggregate of
2,000,000 shares of Common Stock, in a registered direct offering (the "February Offering"). The issuance date of the
108
common stock, the pre-funded warrants and the accompanying common warrants was February 8, 2023. The aggregate net
proceeds to the Company from the February Offering were approximately $8.8 million after deducting $1.2 million in placement
agent fees and other offering expenses, which were allocated to warrant liabilities and included in loss on issuance of warrants on
the statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.
The pre-funded warrants were exercisable immediately following the closing date of the February Offering and have an
unlimited term and an initial exercise price of $0.00001 per share. The common warrants were immediately exercisable and have
a five-year term and an initial exercise price of $5.00 per share, which was lowered to $4.89 per share as a result of an anti-
dilution provision in the common warrants issued in the February Offering that was triggered by the July Offering (as defined
below) and then lowered to $0.51 that was triggered by the sale of our common stock in the open market in November 2023. The
combined offering price was $5.00 per share and accompanying common warrant, or in the case of pre-funded warrants,
$4.99999 per pre-funded warrant and accompanying common warrant. A holder (together with its affiliates) may not exercise any
portion of a pre-funded warrant or common warrant to the extent that the holder would own more than 4.99% (or, at the election
of the holder 9.99%) of the Company’s outstanding common stock immediately after exercise.
The Company accounts for the pre-funded warrants and the common warrants as current liabilities based upon the
guidance of ASC 480 and ASC 815. The Company evaluated the common and pre-funded warrants under ASC 815-40, Derivatives
and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815-40”) and concluded that they do not meet the criteria to be classified in
stockholders’ equity. Specifically, the exercise of the pre-funded warrants could be settled in cash upon the occurrence of a
tender offer or exchange that involves 50% or more of the Company’s common stock. Because a change of 50% or more of the
Company’s common stock may not result in a change in control of the Company, the Company believes that the scope exception
related to the occurrence of a fundamental transaction in ASC 815-40 is not met. The common warrants have the same
characteristics as the pre-funded warrants related to the occurrence of a fundamental transaction, therefore the common
warrants are also precluded from equity classification. In addition, the holder of the common warrants is permitted to receive the
highest volume weighted average price ("VWAP") from the date of announcement of the fundamental transaction through the
date the holder provides notice of repurchase, as a way to protect the holder against reductions in the stock price in a
fundamental transaction, while allowing the holder to keep the benefits of an upside, which precludes the common warrants from
being considered indexed to the Company’s stock. Since the common and pre-funded warrants meet the definition of derivatives
under ASC 815, the Company records these warrants as current liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value, with subsequent
changes in their respective fair values recognized in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss at each reporting date.
Estimating fair values of liability-classified financial instruments requires the development of estimates that may, and are
likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition,
option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company’s common stock.
Because liability-classified financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair value, the Company’s financial
results will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes. Changes in estimated fair value are recognized as a
component of other income (expense) in the statement of operations.
At the date of issuance, the Company valued the common warrants using a Monte-Carlo valuation model due to the
presence of an alternative cashless settlement feature in the financing agreement that provides the warrant holders with an
alternative settlement feature to receive a fixed percentage of the shares underlying the warrants for no consideration. Because
this feature allows for the warrant holders to use an alternative mechanism to exercise their warrants in a manner that would
yield different values, a Monte-Carlo valuation model was determined to be appropriate. The Monte-Carlo valuation resulted in an
estimated fair value of the common warrants at issuance of $10.3 million. The pre-funded warrants were
109
valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model which is a common valuation method that is generally used for valuing
warrants that are for the exercise of a fixed number of shares at a fixed exercise price per share. The Black-Scholes method was
determined to be appropriate for the pre-funded warrants given the lack of alternative mechanisms to settle the warrants in a
manner that would yield different values, such as an alternative cashless settlement feature. The Black-Scholes valuation
resulted in an estimated fair value of the pre-funded warrants at issuance of $1.7 million.
Since the estimated fair value of the warrants at issuance was greater than the gross proceeds of $10.0 million received,
the Company recorded approximately $2.0 million (i.e., the difference of the estimated fair values of the warrants and the gross
proceeds received) as a loss on issuance of warrants on the statement of operations at issuance.
In September 2023, 1,400,000 shares of the common warrants were exercised in connection with the alternative cashless
exercise of the warrants, the Company issued 924,000 shares to the holder. The Company recorded a gain of $3.4 million
resulting from the exercise of the warrants in the accompanying statements of operations for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2023 and recorded $2.8 million in additional-paid-in capital upon the issuance of the shares on the balance sheet
as of December 31, 2023.
In November 2023, 300,000 shares of the pre-funded warrants were exercised in connection with the cashless exercise of
the warrants, the Company issued 300,000 shares to the holder. The Company recorded a gain of $561,000 resulting from the
exercise of the pre-funded warrants in the accompanying statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31,
2023 and recorded $186,000 in additional-paid-in capital upon the issuance of the shares on the balance sheet as of December
31, 2023.
As of December 31, 2023, common warrants to purchase 600,000 shares of the Company's common stock were
outstanding. At December 31, 2023, the Company updated the estimated fair value of the outstanding common warrants using a
Monte-Carlo valuation model resulting in an estimated fair value of $312,000, a decrease of $2.8 million for these common
warrants on the issuance date.
As of December 31, 2023, there were no pre-funded warrants outstanding.
The total gain of $7.2 million and $1.6 million resulting from the change in the estimated fair value of the liabilities for the
common warrants and pre-funded warrants was recorded as a change in the estimated fair value of warrant liabilities in the
accompanying statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, respectively.
The common warrant liability will be adjusted to estimated fair value at each balance sheet date until the warrants are
settled. Changes in the estimated fair value of the warrant liabilities are recognized as a component of other income (expense),
net in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
July 2023 Financing
On July 19, 2023, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with several institutional investors relating to
the purchase and sale of an aggregate of (i) 2,991,027 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and (ii)
accompanying common warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,991,027 shares of Common Stock, in a registered direct offering
(the “July Offering”). The issuance date of the common stock and the accompanying common warrants was July 21, 2023. The
aggregate net proceeds to the Company from the July Offering were approximately $13.9 million after deducting $1.1 million in
placement agent fees and other offering expenses.
The common warrants were immediately exercisable and have a five-year term and an initial exercise price of $4.89 per
share. The combined offering price was $5.015 per share and accompanying common warrant. A holder (together with its
affiliates) may not exercise any portion of the common warrants to the extent that the holder would own more than 4.99% (or, at
the election of the holder 9.99%) of the Company’s outstanding common stock immediately after exercise.
110
The common stock and common warrants are separate freestanding instruments. The estimated fair value of the common
stock issued in the July Offering as of the date of issuance (i.e., July 21, 2023) was $9.1 million, which was the number of shares
of 2,991,027 multiplied by the price per share as of the date of issuance of $3.05 per share. The common stock issued in the July
Offering was classified as equity on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company allocated the offering expenses related to the
July 2023 offering of $1.1 million based on the relative fair values of common stock and common warrants issued. The Company
recognized an expense for the amount allocated to the common warrants of $427,000 (included within other expense, net) upon
the closing of the offering in the twelve months ended December 31, 2023. The Company recorded the amount allocated to the
common stock of $673,000 as a reduction in additional paid-in capital on its balance sheets as of December 31, 2023.
The Company accounted for the common warrants issued in the July Offering as current liabilities based upon the guidance
of ASC 815. The Company evaluated the common warrants under ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s
Own Equity (“ASC 815-40”) and concluded that they do not meet the criteria to be classified in stockholders’ equity. Upon a
fundamental transaction, holders of the common warrants are permitted to settle warrants for a value determined using the
Black Scholes formula that incorporates a leveraged common stock price. Specifically, for purposes of the calculation, the stock
price is determined as the higher of the VWAP measured over the period from the date of announcement of the fundamental
transaction through the date the holder provides notice of repurchase, and the value received by common stockholders in such
fundamental transaction. This in effect protects the holder against reductions in the stock price that may result from a
fundamental transaction, while allowing the holder to keep the benefits of an upside. This feature precludes the common
warrants from being considered indexed to the Company’s stock.
Since the common warrants meet the definition of derivatives under ASC 815, the Company recorded these warrants as
current liabilities on the balance sheet at the estimated fair value, with subsequent changes in their respective estimated fair
values recognized in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss at each reporting date.
Estimating fair values of liability-classified financial instruments requires the development of estimates that may, and are
likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition,
option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company’s common stock.
Because liability-classified financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair value, the Company’s financial
results will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes. Changes in fair value are recognized as a component
of other income (expense) in the statement of operations.
The Company valued the common warrants issued in the July Offering using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The
Black-Scholes method was determined to be appropriate given the lack of alternative mechanisms to settle the warrants in a
manner that would yield different values, such as an alternative cashless settlement feature. The fair value of these warrants as
of the issuance date and as of December 31, 2023 were $5.8 million and $912,000, respectively. The gain of $4.9 million
resulting from the change in the fair value of the liability for these warrants was recorded as a change in estimated fair value of
warrant liabilities in the accompanying statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.
The common warrant liability will be adjusted to estimated fair value at each balance sheet date until the warrants are
settled. Changes in the estimated fair value of the warrant liabilities are recognized as a component of other income (expense),
net in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
As of December 31, 2023, none of the warrants issued in the July Offering have been exercised. Common warrants to
purchase 2,991,027 shares of the Company's common stock were outstanding with an exercise price of $4.89 per share.
111
ATM Financings
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, the Company raised net proceeds (net of commissions) of
approximately $1.6 million from the sale of approximately 1.6 million shares of the Company’s common stock in the open market
at a weighted average price of $0.98 per share pursuant to the 2021 Registration Statement and the 2021 Sales Agreement.
As of March 26, 2024, the Company had up to $222.7 million of the Company’s securities available for sale under the 2021
Registration Statement, of which $72.7 million of the Company’s common stock are available pursuant to the 2021 Sales
Agreement.
Description of Stock-Based Compensation Plans
2000 Stock Plan (Incentive Stock Plan)
In January 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders adopted the DURECT Corporation 2000 Stock Plan,
under which incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options and stock purchase rights may be granted to employees,
consultants and non-employee directors. The 2000 Stock Plan was amended by written consent of the Board of Directors in March
2000 and written consent of the stockholders in August 2000.
In April 2005, the Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the 2000 Stock Plan. At the Company’s annual
stockholders meeting in June 2005, the stockholders approved the amendments of the 2000 Stock Plan to: (i) expand the types of
awards that the Company may grant to eligible service providers under the Stock Plan to include restricted stock units, stock
appreciation rights and other similar types of awards (including other awards under which recipients are not required to pay any
purchase or exercise price) as well as cash awards; and (ii) include certain performance criteria that may be applied to awards
granted under the Stock Plan.
At the Company’s annual stockholders meeting in June 2010, the stockholders approved amendments of the 2000 Stock
Plan to: (i) provide that the number of shares that remain available for issuance will be reduced by two shares for each share
issued pursuant to an award (other than an option or stock appreciation right) granted on or after the date of the 2010 Annual
Meeting; (ii) expand the types of transactions that might be considered repricings and option exchanges for which stockholder
approval is required; (iii) provide that shares tendered or withheld in payment of the exercise price of an option or withheld to
satisfy a withholding obligation, and all shares with respect to which a stock appreciation right is exercised, will not again be
available for issuance under the Stock Plan; (iv) require that options and stock appreciation rights have an exercise price or base
appreciation amount that is at least fair market value on the grant date, except in connection with certain corporate transactions,
and that stock appreciation rights may not have longer than a 10-year term; (v) add new performance goals that may be used to
provide “performance-based compensation” under the 2000 Stock Plan; (vi) extend the term of the 2000 Stock Plan to the date
that is ten (10) years following the stockholders meeting; and (vii) expand the treatment of outstanding awards in connection
with certain changes of control of the Company to cover mergers in which the consideration payable to stockholders is not solely
securities of the successor corporation.
At the Company’s annual stockholders meeting in June 2011, June 2014, June 2016 and June 2018, the stockholders
approved amendments of the 2000 Stock Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for
issuance by 550,000 shares, 400,000 shares, 500,000 shares and 750,000 shares, respectively, each of which had previously
been approved by the Board of Directors.
At the Company’s annual stockholders meeting in June 2019, the stockholders approved an amendment of the 2000 Stock
Plan to extend the term of the 2000 Stock Plan to the date that is ten (10) years following the stockholders meeting.
112
In April 2013, the Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the 2000 Stock Plan to: (i) increase the number of
stock options granted to a non-employee director on the date which such person first becomes a director from 3,000 to 7,000
shares of common stock; each option shall have a ten-year term, become exercisable in installments of one-third of the total
number of options granted on each anniversary of the grant and have a two-year period following termination of Director status
in which the former director can exercise the option; (ii) modify the exercise period for future option grants to a non-employee
director in which a former director can exercise the option following termination of Director status from a one year period to a
two-year period.
Options granted under the 2000 Stock Plan expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. Options may be granted
with different vesting terms from time to time not to exceed five years from the date of grant. The option price of an incentive
stock option granted to an employee or of a nonstatutory stock option granted to any person who owns stock representing more
than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company (or any parent or subsidiary) shall be no less
than 110% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant. The option price of an incentive stock option granted to any
other employee shall be no less than 100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant.
At the Company’s annual stockholders meeting in June 2022, the stockholders approved an amendment of the 2000 Stock
Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance by 1,800,000 shares and to extend
the term of the 2000 Stock Plan to the date that is ten (10) years following the stockholders meeting.
A total of 6,429,650 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under this plan. The plan expires in June
2032.
As of December 31, 2023, 885,208 shares of common stock were available for future grant and options to purchase
4,128,259 shares of common stock were outstanding under the 2000 Stock Plan.
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In August 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. This purchase plan is implemented by a
series of overlapping offering periods of 24 months’ duration, with new offering periods, other than the first offering period,
beginning on May 1 and November 1 of each year and ending April 30 and October 31, respectively, two years later. The
purchase plan allows eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to the lower of
85% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the beginning of each offering period or at the end of each
purchase period. The initial offering period commenced on the effectiveness of the Company’s initial public offering.
In April 2010, the Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. At the
Company’s annual stockholders meeting in June 2010, the stockholders approved the amendment of the 2000 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan to: (i) increase the number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under the ESPP by 25,000
shares; (ii) extend the term of the ESPP to the date that is ten (10) years following the stockholders meeting; (iii) provide for six-
month consecutive offering periods beginning on November 1, 2010; (iv) revise certain provisions to reflect the final regulations
issued under Section 423 of the Code by the Internal Revenue Service; and (v) provide for the cash-out of options outstanding
under an offering period in effect prior to the consummation of certain corporate transactions as an alternative to providing for a
final purchase under such offering period.
In March 2015, the Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. At the
Company’s annual stockholders meeting in June 2015, the stockholders approved the amendments of the 2000 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan to: (i) increase the number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under the ESPP by 35,000
shares; and (ii) extend the term of the ESPP to the date that is ten (10) years following the stockholders meeting. At each of the
Company’s
113
annual stockholders meeting in June 2017 and in June 2020, the stockholders approved amendments of the 2000 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares our common stock authorized for issuance under the ESPP by 35,000 shares and
to re-approve its material terms. At the Company’s annual stockholders meeting in June 2023, the stockholders approved
amendments of the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock authorized for
issuance under the ESPP by 40,000 shares and to re-approve its material terms.
The plan expires in June 2033. A total of 365,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under this plan.
As of December 31, 2023, 55,667 shares of common stock were available for future grant and 309,333 shares of common stock
have been issued under the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
As of December 31, 2023, shares of common stock reserved for future issuance consisted of the following:
Stock options outstanding
Stock options available for grant
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
December 31,
2023
4,128,259
885,208
55,667
5,069,134
A summary of stock option activity under all stock-based compensation plans is as follows:
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Share
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in Years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)
Number of
Options
Outstanding at December 31, 2022
Options granted
Options exercised
Options forfeited
Options expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2023
Exercisable at December 31, 2023
Vested and expected to vest at
December 31, 2023
2,843,416 $
1,756,727 $
(1,077 ) $
(52,340 ) $
(418,467 ) $
4,128,259 $
2,596,670 $
12.97
4.36
5.07
9.83
12.76
9.37
11.52
4.82 $
—
6.22 $
4.54 $
—
—
—
4,128,259 $
9.37
6.22 $
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
was $4.36, $7.76 and $19.38 per share, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total
intrinsic value (i.e., the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of 2023 and the exercise
price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their in-the-money options on December 31, 2023. This amount changes based on the fair market value of the
Company’s common stock. The total value of options exercised was $1,400, $2,300 and $3.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Expenses for non-employee stock options are recorded over the vesting period of the options, which closely approximates
the non-employee’s performance period, with the value determined by the Black-Scholes option valuation method and
remeasured over the vesting term.
114
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had three stock-based equity compensation plans, which are described above. The
employee stock-based compensation cost that has been included in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss is
shown as below (in thousands):
Cost of product revenues
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
$
17 $
1,163
1,358
2,538 $
20 $
1,215
1,222
2,457 $
19
1,245
1,424
2,688
Because the Company had a net operating loss carryforward as of December 31, 2023, no excess tax benefits for the tax
deductions related to stock-based compensation were recognized in the statement of operations. Additionally, no incremental tax
benefits were recognized from stock options exercised during 2023, which would have resulted in a reclassification to reduce net
cash provided by operating activities with an offsetting increase in net cash provided by financing activities.
Determining Fair Value
Valuation and Expense Recognition. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-
Scholes option valuation model. The Company recognizes the expense on a straight-line basis. The expense for options is
recognized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period.
Expected Term. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that the options are expected to be
outstanding. The Company determines the expected life using historical options experience. This develops the expected life by
taking the weighted average of the actual life of options exercised and cancelled and assumes that outstanding options are
exercised uniformly from the current holding period through the end of the contractual life.
Expected Volatility. The Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s common stock.
Risk-Free Rate. The Company bases the risk-free rate that it uses in the Black-Scholes option valuation model on the
implied yield in effect at the time of option grant on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with substantially equivalent remaining
terms.
Dividends. The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and the Company does not anticipate
paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the
Black-Scholes option valuation model.
The Company used the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of options granted and shares purchased under its
stock plans and employee stock purchase plan for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
Stock Options
Risk-free rate
Expected dividend yield
Expected term (in years)
Volatility
Forfeiture rate (1)
(1)
The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
115
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
4.0-4.2%
1.8-4.2%
—
—
7.0-7.5
87-88%
7.0-7.3
83-86%
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.8-1.5%
—
7.0-7.8
85-86%
0.0 %
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Risk-free rate
Expected dividend yield
Expected term (in years)
Volatility
Year ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
4.6-5.1%
0.04-1.49%
—
0.5
—
0.5
88-104%
56-80%
0.04%
—
0.5
56-71%
There were 9,788, 13,575 and 11,367 shares purchased under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan during the
years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Included in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss
for the year ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $5,300, $19,000 and $57,000, respectively, in stock-based
compensation expense related to the recognition of expenses related to shares purchased under the Company’s employee stock
purchase plan.
As of December 31, 2023, $3.3 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock options is
expected to be recognized over the respective vesting terms of each award through 2027. The weighted average term of the
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense is 2.2 years.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2023:
Range of
Exercise Price
Number of
Options
Outstanding
Options Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(In years)
Options Exercisable
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Number of
Options
Exercisable
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
$3.12-$3.12
$3.32-$3.32
$4.00-$4.93
$5.07-$5.07
$5.15-$8.71
$8.80-$12.40
$12.60-$17.70
$18.70-$21.10
$21.90-$27.70
$28.00-$28.00
$3.12 - $28.00
350
715,000
72,250
980,745
700,800
614,788
426,987
524,111
75,728
17,500
4,128,259
9.62 $
9.64 $
8.30 $
8.44 $
6.49 $
2.31 $
3.07 $
4.15 $
5.57 $
1.45 $
6.22 $
3.12
3.32
4.54
5.07
7.04
11.12
14.19
20.71
24.32
28.00
9.37
— $
— $
25,600 $
537,444 $
484,810 $
612,335 $
416,987 $
430,095 $
71,899 $
17,500 $
2,596,670 $
—
—
4.56
5.07
6.61
11.12
14.11
20.77
24.33
28.00
11.52
The Company received $5,500, $8,000 and $3.4 million and $3.2 million in cash from option exercises under all stock-based
compensation plans for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
10.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method under ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items
for tax and financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. Additionally, the Company
must assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered as deductions from future taxable income. The Company
has provided a full valuation allowance on the Company’s deferred tax assets because the Company believes it is more likely
than not that its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company evaluates the realizability of its deferred tax assets on a
quarterly basis. The Company recorded a deferred
116
tax liability of $244,000 and $244,000 on its balance sheet at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, that arose from tax
amortization of an indefinite-lived intangible asset. The Company recorded a tax expense of zero in the years ended December
31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The reconciliation of income tax expenses (benefit), at the statutory federal income tax rate of 21%, to net income tax
benefit included in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
is as follows (in thousands):
U.S. federal taxes benefit at statutory rate
Change in valuation allowance
Stock-based compensation
Research and development tax credits
Warrants
Expiring net operating losses
Other
Total income tax (benefit) provision
Year Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
$
(5,801 ) $
3,733
631
(1,047 )
(2,084 )
4,540
28
— $
(7,420 ) $
1,152
371
(1,449 )
—
7,313
33
— $
(7,616 )
2,266
641
(954 )
—
5,612
51
—
In 2023, 2022 and 2021, total income tax provision (benefit) expense was zero. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect
the net tax effects of net operating loss, research and other credit carryforwards, and the temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards
Research and other credits
Section 174 R&D capitalization
Deferred revenue
Stock-based compensation
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities - right of use asset
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities
December 31,
2023
2022
83,752
21,679
11,004
—
3,076
4,976
124,487
(123,393 )
(1,338 )
(244 ) $
83,262
20,602
6,911
—
2,603
4,765
118,143
(117,639 )
(748 )
(244 )
$
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that the Company believes that these assets are more likely
than not to be realized. In making such a determination, all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results
of recent operations. If it is determined that the Company would be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of
their net recorded amount, the Company would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would
cause a provision benefit to be recognized. The recognition and measurement of tax benefits requires significant judgment.
Judgments concerning the recognition and measurement of tax benefit might change as new information becomes available.
Given the Company’s history of operating losses, the net deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. The
valuation allowance increased by $5.8 million, $1.3 million and $2.0 million during 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
117
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of
approximately $312.6 million, of which approximately $224.0 million will expire in the years 2024 through 2037, and
approximately $88.6 million which do not expire, and federal research and development tax credits of approximately $19.0
million, which expire at various dates beginning in 2024 through 2043, if not utilized.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of
approximately $266.2 million, which expire in the years 2024 through 2043, if not utilized, and state research and development
tax credits of approximately $18.5 million, which do not expire.
Utilization of the net operating losses may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to federal and state ownership
change limitations. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses before utilization.
At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $13.6 million
and $13.1 million, respectively (none of which, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate). The Company does
not believe there will be any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next twelve months.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at beginning of the year
Decrease related to prior year tax positions
Increase related to current year tax positions
Balance at end of the year
December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
13,068 $
(170 )
670
13,568 $
12,421
(188 )
835
13,068
Interest and penalty costs related to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, are classified as a component of interest and other
income, net in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company did not recognize any interest and penalties
expenses related to unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company is subject
to U.S. federal and state income tax examination for calendar tax years ending 2000 through 2023 due to unutilized net
operating losses and research credits.
Beginning with 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the option to deduct research and development expenditures
when incurred under Section 174 and requires taxpayers to capitalize and amortize domestic expenditures over five years and
foreign expenditures over fifteen years. Therefore, based on enacted law, there is a deferred tax asset reflected in the deferred
tax table for this item, which is offset by a valuation allowance.
11. Subsequent Events
From February 1, 2024 to March 26, 2024, the Company raised net proceeds (net of commissions) of approximately
$648,000 from the sale of approximately 702,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the open market at a weighted
average price of $0.94 per share pursuant to the 2021 Registration Statement and the 2021 Sales Agreement.
118
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15, DURECT’s management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the
effectiveness of DURECT’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based
on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that DURECT’s disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such
term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on that evaluation,
our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required
by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
119
Item 9B. Other Information.
During the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2023, none of our directors or officers informed us of the adoption or
termination of a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as those terms are defined in
Regulation S-K, Item 408.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
120
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The names of the executive officers of the Company and their ages, titles and biographies as of the date hereof are
incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 1, above.
DIRECTORS
Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with staggered three-year
terms.
Our Class III directors, whose terms expire at our 2024 annual meeting, are Mohammad Azab, James E. Brown and Gail M.
Farfel. Our Class I directors, whose terms expire at our 2025 annual meeting, are Terrence F. Blaschke and Gail J. Maderis. Our
Class II directors, whose terms expire at our 2025 annual meeting, are Peter S. Garcia and Judith J. Robertson. Only one class of
directors is elected at each annual meeting. The other classes continue to serve for the remainder of their three-year terms.
Directors
The names of our directors, their ages as of March 26, 2024 and certain other information about them are set forth below.
Name
James E. Brown, D.V.M.
Mohammad Azab, M.D., M. Sc., M.B.A. (1) (3) (4)
Terrence F. Blaschke, M.D. (3) (4)
Gail M. Farfel, Ph.D. (4)
Peter S. Garcia, M.B.A. (1) (2)
Gail J. Maderis, M.B.A. (1) (2)
Judith J. Robertson (2) (3)
Age
67
68
81
60
62
66
64
Position
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Director
Director, Chair of the Research and Development Committee
Director
Director, Chair of the Audit Committee
Chair of the Board, Chair of the Compensation Committee
Director, Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
(1) Member of the Compensation Committee
(2) Member of the Audit Committee
(3) Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
(4) Member of the Research and Development Committee
James E. Brown, D.V.M. for the biography of Dr. Brown, please see “Part I, Item 1” – “Executive Officers of the
Registrant” above. Dr. Brown’s scientific expertise and pharmaceutical industry experience as well as his valuable perspective as
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and co-founder are among the special qualifications that he brings to our Board of
Directors.
Mohammad Azab, M.D., M. Sc., M.B.A. has served on our Board of Directors since January 2021. Dr. Azab served as
President and Chief Medical Officer of Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Astex”) from January 2014 to November 2020 after holding
the position of Chief Medical Officer there commencing in July 2009. Upon retirement from his management role, Dr. Azab served
as the chair of the board of directors for Astex, a subsidiary of Otsuka pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd, till May 2022. Previously, Dr. Azab
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Intradigm Corporation, a developer of small interfering RNA cancer
therapeutics. Prior to this, Dr. Azab served as Executive Vice President of Research and Development, and Chief Medical Officer
of QLT Inc., and in several drug development leadership positions at Astra Zeneca in the UK and Sanofi Pharmaceuticals in
France. Dr. Azab holds his M.D. degree (M.B., B.Ch.) from Cairo University and a Master of Business Administration from the
Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario. He received post-graduate training and
121
degrees in oncology research from the University of Paris-Sud and biostatistics from the University of Pierre et Marie Curie in
Paris, France. Dr. Azab has more than 30 years of experience in clinical research, global drug development, and business
management and led the global development of several drugs currently approved in oncology and other therapeutic areas.
Currently, he also serves on the board of directors of Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Lisata Therapeutics. Dr. Azab’s scientific
background including his senior management experience in the pharmaceutical industry and his service as a board member on
multiple publicly traded companies are among the qualifications he brings to our Board of Directors.
Terrence F. Blaschke, M.D. has served on our Board of Directors since December 2006. Dr. Blaschke has served on the
faculty of Stanford University since 1974 and is Professor of Medicine and Molecular Pharmacology (Emeritus) at the Stanford
University School of Medicine. Dr. Blaschke held the position of Vice President of Methodology and Science at Pharsight
Corporation from 2000 to 2002. During the course of his career, Dr. Blaschke has served as an independent consultant working
with a number of leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Dr. Blaschke was formerly a board member of
Therapeutic Discovery Corporation until 1997 and Crescendo Pharmaceuticals until 2001, two publicly traded companies. He has
also worked as a special government employee for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) and has served as Chair of
the FDA's Generic Drugs Advisory Committee. After becoming emeritus, Dr. Blaschke joined the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation as a Senior Program Officer from 2012 to January 2016. Dr. Blaschke holds his M.D. degree from Columbia University
and a B.S. in Mathematics from the University of Denver. Dr. Blaschke’s medical and scientific expertise and pharmaceutical
industry experience relating to drug development are among the qualifications he brings to our Board of Directors.
Gail M. Farfel, Ph.D. has served on our Board of Directors since April 2019. Dr. Farfel served as the Chief Executive
Officer of ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. from September 2022 through December 2023. ProMIS is a biotechnology company focused
on the discovery and development of antibody therapeutics targeting misfolded proteins such as toxic oligomers, implicated in
the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Prior to that, Dr. Farfel served as the Executive Vice President and Chief
Development Officer of Zogenix, Inc. (“Zogenix”) from July 2015 and on the board of directors of Zogenix International Ltd., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Zogenix, Inc. until the acquisition of Zogenix by UCB Pharma S.A. in March 2022, where she oversaw
Nonclinical and Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs. Before joining Zogenix, Dr. Farfel was Chief Clinical and Regulatory
Officer of Marinus Pharmaceuticals Inc., a biopharma engaged in development of treatment for neurological disorders. Prior to her
entry into the biotech space, Dr. Farfel served as Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head for Neuroscience at Novartis
Pharmaceuticals Corporation, where she oversaw their portfolio of neurology and psychiatry products. Dr. Farfel began her career
in pharmaceutical drug development at Pfizer Inc., where she worked in Clinical Development and Global Medical Affairs,
directing programs through all stages of clinical development and regulatory submissions. Additionally, Dr. Farfel has served on
the board of directors of AVROBIO, Inc. since October 2020. Dr. Farfel is the author of over 50 scientific articles and presentations
in the areas of neuropsychopharmacology and drug effects and is a Director on the Board of the American Society for
Experimental Neurotherapeutics. She holds a Ph.D. in Neuropsychopharmacology from the University of Chicago, where she is a
Director on the Alumni Board. Dr. Farfel also holds a bachelor’s degree in Biochemistry from the University of Virginia. Dr. Farfel’s
pharmaceutical industry experience relating to executive management, strategic planning, medical and scientific expertise and
pharmaceutical industry experience as it relates to drug development and regulatory affairs are among the qualifications she
brings to our Board of Directors.
Peter S. Garcia, M.B.A. has served on our Board of Directors since December 2021. Mr. Garcia has worked as a Chief
Financial Officer in the life sciences industry for over 25 years and raised over $2 billion in capital during that period. He is
currently the Chief Financial Officer of ALX Oncology Holdings Inc. (“ALX”) since joining them in January 2020 and led their initial
public offering in July
122
2020 and follow on offering in December 2020. Prior to ALX, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2013
until 2019 at PDL BioPharma, Inc. (“PDL”), an acquirer of royalties and pharmaceutical assets. Before his time at PDL, Mr. García
served as Chief Financial Officer at BioTime, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company now known as Lineage Cell
Therapeutics. He previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Marina Biotech, Nanosys, Nuvelo, Novacept, IntraBiotics
Pharmaceuticals and Dendreon, and began his life science career at Amgen where he served in a number of financial roles of
increasing responsibility. Mr. García holds an M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles and a B.A. in Economics and
Sociology from Stanford University. Mr. Garcia’s pharmaceutical industry experience relating to finance and accounting,
executive management, treasury, employee benefits and audit matters are among the qualifications he brings to our Board of
Directors.
Gail J. Maderis, M.B.A. has served on our Board of Directors since January 2021 and as Chair of our Board of Directors
since March 2023. Ms. Maderis has served as Chair of the board of Antiva Biosciences, Inc. ("Antiva"), a venture funded
biopharma company developing topical therapies to treat the pre-cancerous lesions caused by human papillomavirus, since April
2023. From 2015 to April 2023, Ms. Maderis served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Antiva. From 2009 to 2015, Ms.
Maderis led BayBio, the industry organization representing and supporting Northern California's life science community, as its
President and Chief Executive Officer. From 2003 to 2009, Ms. Maderis served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Five
Prime Therapeutics, Inc., a protein discovery and development company focused on immuno-oncology. Prior to FivePrime, Ms.
Maderis held senior executive positions at Genzyme Corporation, including Founder and President of Genzyme Molecular
Oncology. Ms. Maderis also practiced management and strategy consulting with Bain & Co. She currently serves on the boards of
directors of Antiva and Valitor, Inc., as well as on the nonprofit boards of BIO (Emerging Company and Health Sections), California
Life Sciences Association, The Termeer Foundation and the University of California Berkeley Foundation Board of Trustees. Ms.
Maderis previously served on the board of directors of Allarity Therapeutics, Inc. (“Allarity”) from July 2021 until January 2023 and
on the board of directors of Allarity Therapeutics A/S, Allarity’s predecessor, since October 2020. She received a Bachelor of
Science in business from the University of California at Berkeley and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business
School. Ms. Maderis’ operational, industry and leadership experience in the biopharmaceutical industry as Chief Executive Officer
of Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc., Founder and President of Genzyme Molecular Oncology and her current position at Antiva, and
her insight into business and policy trends impacting the biopharma industry are among the qualifications she brings to our Board
of Directors.
Judith J. Robertson has served on our Board of Directors since April 2019. Since January 2022, Ms. Robertson has served
as the Chief Commercial Officer of Opthea Limited (“Opthea”) and previously was the Chief Commercial Officer of Aerie
Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Aerie”) from December 2016 to December 2018, during which time she built the commercial organization
and led the successful commercial launch of Rhopressa® (netarsudil) for glaucoma. Ms. Robertson joined Aerie from the Janssen
Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson (“Janssen”), where she was the Vice President and Global Commercial Strategy
Leader of Immunology, Ophthalmology, and Commercial Analytics from June 2013 to November 2016. Part of her duties at
Janssen included evaluating all external licensing and acquisition opportunities. Prior to Janssen, she was Vice President Global
Business Franchise Head of Ophthalmology at Novartis Pharma AG (“Novartis”) (f/k/a Alcon Laboratories, Inc.), Vice President
Global Franchise Head of Respiratory at Novartis, Vice President of Sales & Marketing of Respiratory and Dermatology at Novartis,
and President of Bristol Myers Squibb Canada Co. Ms. Robertson previously served on the board of directors of Opthea from June
2021 to January 1, 2022. Ms. Robertson holds a Master of Management from the Kellogg School of Business at Northwestern
University and holds a Bachelor of Arts in social science from Ryerson University. Ms. Robertson’s pharmaceutical industry
experience relating to executive leadership experience with pharmaceutical companies and her expertise with respect to sales,
marketing and commercialization of pharmaceutical products are among the qualifications she brings to our Board of Directors.
123
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Code of Ethics
In December 2023, the Board approved an amended Code of Ethics applicable to all of our employees, officers and
directors. The purpose of the Code of Ethics is to deter wrongdoing and, among other things, promote compliance with applicable
laws, fair dealing, proper use and protection of our assets, prompt and accurate public company reporting, reporting of
accounting complaints or concerns and avoidance of conflicts of interest and usurpation of corporate opportunities.
Our Code of Ethics can be found on our corporate website at www.durect.com under “Investors—Corporate Governance—
Documents & Charters.” If we make any substantive amendments to the Code of Ethics or grant any waiver from a provision of
the Code of Ethics to any executive officer or director, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver by a
method selected by the Board of Directors and in conformity with applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.
Whistleblower Policy
In December 2003, in compliance with Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors established procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and confidential, anonymous employee submissions of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters (“Whistleblower Policy”). In December 2023, the Board approved an amended
Whistleblower Policy. Our Whistleblower Policy can be found on our corporate website at www.durect.com under “Investors—
Corporate Governance—Documents & Charters.”
Audit Committee
Audit Committee The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.
In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board in its general oversight of our financial reporting, internal
controls and audit functions, and is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the work
of our independent registered public accounting firm. At the end of the last fiscal year, the Audit Committee was composed of the
following directors: Peter S. Garcia, Gail J. Maderis and Judy J. Robertson. Mr. Garcia has served as Chair of the Audit Committee
since June 2023 following the retirement of Mr. Hoffmann who served as Chair of the Audit Committee from September 2004 to
June 2023.
Among other matters, the Audit Committee monitors the activities and performance of our external auditors, including the
audit scope, external audit fees, auditor independence matters and the extent to which the independent registered public
accounting firm may be retained to perform non-audit services. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young
LLP, provides the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee
concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discusses with the independent registered public accounting firm and
management that firm’s independence.
In accordance with Audit Committee policy and the requirements of law, all services to be provided by Ernst & Young are
pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Pre-approval includes audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other
services. In its pre-approval and review of non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other factors, the
possible effect of the performance of such services on the auditor’s independence. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest
in maintaining auditor independence, the law prohibits a publicly traded company from obtaining certain non-audit services from
its auditing firm.
As required by Nasdaq rules, the members of the Audit Committee each qualify as “independent” under special standards
established for members of audit committees. The Audit Committee also includes
124
at least one member who has been determined by the Board to meet the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert”
in accordance with SEC rules. Peter S. Garcia has been determined by the Board of Directors to be “audit committee financial
experts.” Stockholders should understand that this designation is a disclosure requirement of the SEC related to Mr. Garcia’s
experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. The designation does not impose upon
Mr. Garcia any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than are generally imposed on either of them as members of the
Audit Committee and the Board, and their designation as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this SEC requirement
does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or the Board.
Hedging and Stock Ownership Policies
Our insider trading policy provides that all officers and employees of the Company, all members of the Board, and any
consultants and contractors to the Company that the Company designates, as well as, to the extent controlled by or benefiting
any of the foregoing persons, members of the immediate families (spouse, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren and
siblings, including any such relationships that arise through marriage or adoption) sharing a household with the officer,
employee, director, consultant or contractor, and any other member of the households of persons directly subject to this Policy,
and family trusts (or similar family entities) may not engage in any transactions that suggest speculation in our stock (that is, an
attempt to profit in short-term movements, either increases or decreases, in the stock price). The policy notes that many
“hedging” transactions, such as “collar” transactions, contingent or forward sales, and other similar or related arrangements, are
prohibited. Specifically, our insider trading policy precludes any employee or Officer from engaging in any “short” sale, “sale
against the box” or any equivalent transaction involving our stock (or the stock of any of our business partners in any of the
situations described above).
We do not have a stock ownership policy.
125
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Committee (for purposes of this analysis, the “Committee”) of the Board has responsibility for
establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence with our compensation practices. The Committee makes all
decisions regarding the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (our “CFO”), as well
as the other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table below (together with our CEO and CFO, our “Named
Executive Officers”) and all of our Vice Presidents. In this proxy, we refer to those persons as our “Officers.”
Philosophy and Elements
All of our compensation programs are designed to attract and retain key employees, motivating them to achieve corporate
and individual objectives and rewarding them appropriately for their performance. Different programs are geared to short and
longer-term performance with the goal of increasing stockholder value over the long term. Executive compensation programs
impact all employees by setting general levels of compensation and helping to create an environment of goals, rewards and
expectations. Because we believe the performance of every employee is important to our success, we consider the effect of
executive compensation and incentive programs on all of our employees.
We believe that the compensation of our Officers should reflect the extent of their success as a management team and in
addition, their individual performance in attaining key operating objectives, such as advancing our product pipeline, entering into
strategic collaborative agreements and maintaining our financial strength, and ultimately, increasing stockholder value. We
believe that the performance of our Officers in managing the Company, considered in light of general economic and specific
Company, industry and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation. We also believe
that their compensation should not be based on the short-term performance of our stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, but
rather that the price of our stock will, in the long-term, reflect our operating performance, and ultimately, the management of the
Company by our Officers. We seek to have the long-term performance of our stock reflected in executive compensation through
our stock option and other equity incentive programs.
Elements of compensation for our executives include: salary, bonus, stock incentive awards and perquisites. We choose to
pay each element of compensation to our executives in order to attract and retain the necessary executive talent, reward
performance and provide incentive for their balanced focus on long-term strategic goals as well as short-term performance. The
amount of each element of compensation is determined by or under the direction of the Committee, which uses the following
factors to determine the amount of salary and other benefits to pay each executive:
•
•
•
•
•
•
performance against corporate and individual objectives for the previous year;
value of their unique skills and capabilities to support our long-term performance;
performance of their general management responsibilities;
contribution as a member of our executive management team;
difficulty of achieving desired results in the coming year and years to follow; and
compensation paid by companies deemed by the Committee to be comparable to us.
These elements fit into our overall compensation objectives by helping to secure the future potential of our products and
operations, continuing to meet our business objectives, providing proper compliance and regulatory guidance, and helping to
create an effective and cohesive team. Our policy for allocating
126
between long-term and currently paid compensation is to ensure adequate base compensation to attract and retain personnel,
while providing incentives to maximize long-term value for us and our stockholders. Likewise, we provide cash compensation in
the form of base salary to meet competitive salary norms and reward performance on an annual basis and in the form of bonus
compensation to reward superior performance against specific annual goals. We provide non-cash compensation (i.e., stock
options) to reward superior performance against specific objectives and long-term strategic goals. Our compensation package for
our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2023 ranged from 41% to 64% in cash compensation and 36% to 59% in non-cash
compensation, including benefits and equity-related awards. We believe that this structure is competitive within the marketplace
and appropriate to fulfill our stated policies. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash
and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. Rather, the Committee reviews information from relevant
peer companies, and such other information as it considers appropriate, to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive
compensation.
Setting Officer Compensation
Process
At one or more meetings at the end of each fiscal year (usually in December) or early in the following fiscal year (usually in
January or February), the Committee reviews our performance during the fiscal year against established corporate objectives,
individual Officer performance and history of all the elements of each Officer’s total compensation in comparison with the
compensation of executive officers in an appropriate peer group as described below. After due consideration of the foregoing, the
Committee:
•
•
•
•
•
sets the base salaries for our Officers for the following fiscal year;
approves individual Officer bonus payments for performance for the prior fiscal year;
approves stock options that will be granted to each Officer for performance for the prior fiscal year;
adopts the management incentive plan (including objectives and weighting) for the following fiscal year; and
decides upon general compensation guidelines and overall salary, bonus and stock option budgets for all
employees.
The specific basis for the determination of base salaries, bonuses and stock option grants to Officers is detailed below.
Role of Executive Officers
The CEO annually reviews the performance of each Officer (other than his own performance, which is reviewed by the
Committee) with the assistance and input from our head of Human Resources. The conclusions reached and recommendations
made based on these reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and annual award amounts, are presented to the
Committee. Officers, other than the CEO, are not present at the time of these deliberations. The Committee can exercise its
discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards to executives and ultimately makes the final decision with
respect to the compensation of all our Officers. The CEO is not present during the Committee’s deliberations and discussion on
their individual compensation.
Benchmarking
To assist the Committee in benchmarking executive compensation for 2023, the Committee retained Larry Setren &
Associates, an independent compensation consulting firm, to collect and synthesize data from several sources as detailed below.
127
To benchmark our Officer cash bonus opportunities and equity awards and base salaries for fiscal year 2023, the
Committee reviewed compensation information as reported in the definitive proxies for fiscal year 2022 from the following public
life sciences companies: 89bio, Axcella, Atreca, Cymabay Therapeutics, CytomX Therapeutics, Eiger Biopharma, Gritstone bio,
Harpoon Therapeutics, Magenta Therapeutics, Ovid Therapeutics, Spero Therapeutics, Surrozen, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Unity
Biotechnology and Viking Therapeutics (the “Peer Companies”). The Committee selected the Peer Companies as a relevant
comparison group for us based on various criteria including similarity of business, employee headcount, market capitalization and
revenue, and reviewed the proposed Peer Companies with Larry Setren & Associates for appropriateness as a comparison group.
Where such source did not provide sufficient information with respect to the bonus and equity compensation of certain officer
positions, the Committee used compensation information from The Radford Global Life Sciences Survey (2022) (the “2022
Radford Survey”) as a supplement. The Committee took into consideration the summarized compensation data from the Peer
Companies along with the data from the 2022 Radford Survey when setting base salaries applicable for fiscal year 2023 and
determining the cash bonus opportunities and stock option awards for our Officers for fiscal year 2023.
Base Salary
It is the goal of the Committee to establish salary compensation for our Officers that is competitive with comparable peer
companies. In setting Officer base salaries for fiscal year 2023 (which were set in July 2023), the Committee reviewed the salary
compensation of officers with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities as reported in the 2022 Radford Survey
and definitive proxies of the Peer Companies. It is not our policy to pay our CEO or other Officers at the highest level relative to
their respective counterparts at the Peer Companies. In setting target compensation for our Officers, the Committee uses as a
reference point the 50th percentile of compensation paid to similarly situated executives at the Peer Companies. Variations to this
objective may occur as dictated by the experience and performance level of the individual and market factors. We believe that
this gives us the opportunity to attract and retain talented managerial employees both at the senior executive level and below,
yet conserves our financial resources, to the benefit of our stockholders.
For fiscal year 2023, the Committee, after considering market practice survey data of our Peer Companies, awarded a 4%
merit raise to the Officers as of July 1, 2023. The Committee approved the increase in base salary for each of the Officers based
on individual merit and performance. The following table summarizes the annual base salary rates of our Named Executive
Officers at fiscal year-end in 2023 compared to 2022.
Name
James E. Brown
Timothy M. Papp
Norman L. Sussman
2022
Base Salary ($)
2023
Base Salary ($)
574,918
415,000
413,332
597,914
431,600
429,865
Bonus (Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation)
The cash bonus element of our executive compensation is designed to reward our Officers for the achievement of shorter-
term corporate goals, measurable on an annual basis, as well as, with certain exceptions noted below for the CEO, individual
Officer performance. Our general process for determining the bonus element of our Officer compensation for fiscal year 2023
performance is set forth below.
In setting the target bonus for which each Officer would be eligible for fiscal 2023 performance, the Committee reviewed
the bonuses of officers with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at companies as reported in the 2022
Radford Survey and definitive proxies of the Peer Companies.
128
For performance in fiscal year 2023, the Committee set the target bonus for the CEO at 60% of such individual’s base
notional salary, and for all other Officers at 30%–40% of such individual’s base notional salary. The two factors used by the
Committee to determine the percentage of the target amount to be awarded to any individual Officer other than the CEO are the
individual performance of such Officer during the relevant fiscal year and the Company’s performance as a whole against pre-set
corporate objectives for fiscal year 2023 (the “Corporate Objectives”). The Committee retains the discretion to adjust actual
bonus payments based on other factors, as discussed below.
The Corporate Objectives for each fiscal year are typically established by the Committee in consultation with our Officers in
the first quarter of such fiscal year. The Corporate Objectives comprise product development, financial, business development
and operational goals with varying degrees of difficulty and have associated target dates for accomplishment. Each objective is
weighted based on its importance to the accomplishment of the Company’s plans. At the end of each fiscal year, the Committee
makes a determination of the overall percentage of the Corporate Objectives accomplished by the Company as a whole during
the fiscal year. The Committee exercises its reasonable discretion in determining the percentage of Corporate Objectives
accomplished by the Company, including, for example, taking into account the achievement of any listed objective above
expectations or the accomplishments of the Company that were not listed in the Corporate Objectives.
For fiscal year 2023, the Corporate Objectives against which Officer performance was evaluated consisted of, among
others, the following goals.
•
Financial
o
The principal financial goals were to operate within the approved corporate budget, meet revenue and cash
contribution targets for the ALZET® product line, have a cash and investments balance of at least $25 million at
the time of the AHFIRM data readout, and end 2023 with a minimum of 18 months of cash runway.
•
Product Development of Larsucosterol and Research and Development
o
The primary goals related to completing the AHFIRM trial by the end of the second quarter, publishing the Phase
2a results in a peer reviewed journal, achieving certain manufacturing targets, developing commercial launch
plans by the end of the second quarter, reporting topline data from AHFIRM by the end of 2023, submitting a
request for and End of Phase 2 meeting with the FDA, and completing certain defined steps for the pursuit of an
indication other than AH or for another new chemical entity.
The Committee believes that the accomplishments of the Company as a whole are an important measure of the
performance of all of our Officers, including the effectiveness of their leadership and teamwork. In particular, the percentage of
the total eligible amount that is normally awarded to the CEO as a bonus is based entirely on the Company’s overall performance
and accomplishment of the Corporate Objectives because the Committee believes that the paramount duty of this individual is
leadership. Thus, the bonus awarded to the CEO for a fiscal year is typically computed by multiplying the percentage determined
by the Committee based on Corporate Objectives accomplished and the Company’s overall performance by 60% of the CEO base
salary (the target bonus amount that he is eligible to receive as set by the Committee).
For a fiscal year, the Committee typically applies a weighting of Corporate Objectives (80% for Vice Presidents; 90% for
Senior Vice Presidents; and 95% for the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice Presidents) and applies a
weighting of individual performance (20% for Vice Presidents; 10% for Senior Vice Presidents; and 5% for the Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice Presidents) for Officers other than the CEO.
129
The individual performance of each Officer, except for the CEO, is assessed as part of an annual written performance
appraisal performed typically at the end of each fiscal year. At the end of each fiscal year or early in the following fiscal year,
each Officer, together with his or her supervisor (e.g., the CEO), agrees upon a written set of objectives for the following fiscal
year pertinent to the Officer individually (which includes goals for the functional area or business managed by such Officer). The
supervisor also assesses the accomplishments of the Officer in the most recently completed fiscal year against the applicable
pre-established objectives for that Officer in such year, and arrives at a percentage of goals accomplished. Thus, the bonus of
each Officer other than the CEO is typically determined as follows:
Bonus Amount = (A% * B% + C% * D%) * E% * Base Salary
A = the percentage (5%, 10% or 20%) of individual performance applicable to the Officer
B = the percentage of personal objectives accomplished by the Officer as determined by the Officer’s supervisor
C = the percentage (80%, 90% or 95%) of weighting of Corporate Objectives
D = the percentage of Corporate Objectives accomplished and overall performance by the Company as determined by the
Committee
E = the percentage (30%, 35% or 40%) of the base salary set as the maximum bonus target applicable to the Officer
Notwithstanding the general practice with respect to determination of Officer bonuses set forth above, the Committee
retains complete discretion to adjust the result obtained using the general approach for individual variations in performance or
business considerations.
The Board tracked performance against these corporate goals throughout fiscal year 2023. At the end of the year, the
Committee determined that no corporate bonuses would be paid to all employees (including our Named Executive Officers)
relative to 2023 performance, and thus did not come to a formal determination of the exact percentage of corporate goals that
had been achieved.
The total calculated bonus award for the Named Executive Officers for 2023 are set forth in the table below.
Name
James E. Brown
'Timothy M. Papp
Norman L. Sussman
Equity Incentive Program
2023
Base Salary ($)
597,914
431,600
429,865
Annual Incentive
Opportunity
Target
(as % of base salary)
60 %
40 %
40 %
Target ($)
358,748
172,640
171,946
Actual
2023
Earned Award ($)
—
—
—
We intend that our equity incentive program is the primary vehicle for offering long-term incentives and rewarding our
Officers and key employees. We also regard our equity incentive program as a key retention tool. This is a very important factor
in our determination of the type of award to grant and the number of underlying shares that are granted in connection with that
award. Because of the direct relationship between the value of an option and the market price of our common stock, we have
always believed that granting stock options is the best method of motivating our Officers to manage the Company in a manner
that is consistent with our interests and those of our stockholders. It is our typical practice to grant stock options to our Officers
and all employees annually in connection with our annual employee performance appraisal.
130
At the same meeting(s) during which the Committee determines our Officer base salaries for the following fiscal year and
bonuses for performance in the previous fiscal year, the Committee also determines the ranges of stock options for which our
Officers are eligible by rank. The Committee sets these ranges after consideration of (a) the value of equity incentive awards of
officers with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at the then-current peer companies, (b) the dilution that
would be created by the stock options awards for that fiscal year (the “Burn Rate”), (c) the overall value of equity held by our
employees as a retention incentive, and (d) the Company’s prior year performance. The Committee’s general philosophy is that
the value of our equity incentive awards to our Officers should be competitive with the then-current peer companies subject to
the Company maintaining a Burn Rate for its equity incentive programs that is not overly dilutive to our stockholders and
comparable to other companies in the then-current peer group.
For our annual stock option grant, which occurred on February 21, 2023, the Committee targeted a Burn Rate (computed as
total shares subject to the annual option grants to all employees including Officers for the 2023 fiscal year divided by total
outstanding shares as of December 31, 2022) of approximately 2.5%.
The factors used by the Committee to determine the specific number of shares underlying any stock option grant to any
individual Officer other than the CEO include the individual performance of such Officer during the prior fiscal year and the
performance of the Company as a whole against the Corporate Objectives, as well as the factors described below in “Timing and
Amount of Grants.” The specific number of shares underlying the stock option grants to our CEO is determined based on the
performance of the Company as a whole against the Corporate Objectives and review of option grants by Peer Companies.
In addition, our Board of Directors and Committee may grant equity compensation to our Officers and employees at any
time for incentive and retention purposes in keeping with our non-cash equity compensation practices outlined below.
August 2023 Option Grants
In August 2023, the Committee made the decision to grant performance-based stock options to our Named Executive
Officers and certain employees. The performance-based stock option grants will vest upon meeting certain specified
development and regulatory milestones within specified time frames related to larsucosterol for severe AH, with such vesting also
subject to the optionee providing continuous service to the Company through the date of the applicable vesting event.
Stock Option Practices
Overview
It is our practice to grant stock options to all of our employees. Stock option award levels are determined based on market
data and vary among individuals based on their positions within the Company and their individual performance. Stock options are
generally granted in connection with:
•
•
•
•
•
•
the hiring of employees (including Officers);
the promotion of employees (including Officers);
the annual performance appraisal of employees (including Officers);
rewarding certain employees (including Officers) for exceptional accomplishments;
periodically in lieu of cash bonuses or voluntary reductions in salary; and
from time to time for incentive and retention purposes.
131
We also, from time-to-time, and on an infrequent basis, grant stock options to certain consultants with specialized skills
who provide important services to us. All of our stock options are granted under and pursuant to the terms of our 2000 Stock
Plan.
Authority
The Board has delegated the authority to grant stock options under specified terms and conditions to a committee
consisting of our CEO, CFO and Vice President of Finance (the “Officer Committee”) in connection with the hiring and promotion
of non-Officer employees and the rewarding of non-Officer employees for exceptional performance. Other than as expressly
delegated by the Committee or the Board in accordance with the Stock Plan, the authority to grant stock options and other equity
compensation resides exclusively with the Committee or the Board. In particular, the Committee or the Board has the exclusive
authority to grant stock options to Directors and Officers.
Timing and Amount of Grants
Options to newly hired Officers are approved by action of our Board or the Committee by meeting or unanimous written
consent prior to and granted effective as of the first day of employment of such Officer, typically at the same time as the
ratification of their employment. Options to newly hired employees who are not Officers and where the number of shares
underlying the stock option grant does not exceed 5,000 shares are granted by unanimous written consent of the Officer
Committee on the tenth business day of the subsequent calendar month of their hire, and the Officer Committee meets or acts by
unanimous written consent on or before the tenth business day of the calendar month to approve the option grants to be made
on the tenth business day of the calendar month.
Annual grants of stock options to our employees and Officers are made usually in January or February of each year after the
conclusion of our annual Company-wide performance appraisal of all employees for the previous fiscal year. Even though the
Committee may complete the evaluation of the performance of Officers prior to the completion of the performance appraisal
process for the entire Company, it has been our practice in the last several years to grant the stock options to Officers
simultaneously with the grant of stock options to our employees. In determining the annual grant amounts, the Committee
considers a review of market data for comparable positions and each individual’s accumulated vested and unvested awards,
current and potential realizable value over time using stock appreciation assumptions, vesting schedules, comparison of
individual awards between Officers and in relation to other compensation elements, stockholder dilution and accounting expense,
and corporate performance as well as each individual’s performance.
Other than as described above with respect to newly hired employees, it is our practice to grant stock options (such as in
connection with promotions, rewarding exceptional accomplishments and grants to consultants) effective on the date of the
Board, Committee or Officer Committee’s action by meeting or unanimous written consent.
We do not have a policy that precludes the granting of stock options when the Company or the Board is in possession of
material nonpublic information or at certain periods in relation to our earnings releases. Although the Committee has considered
whether such a policy would be advisable, the Committee does not feel that adoption of such policy is warranted at present since
we grant stock options based on timelines in the normal course of business independent of the occurrence of these types of
events (e.g., at a pre-established date each month for newly hired employees, on the first date of employment for newly hired
Officers or upon the completion of the Company’s annual performance appraisal with respect to the annual grant). The
Committee will periodically review the need for any such type of policy on timing, but at present, reserves the right to grant stock
options at any time consistent with our policies, the Stock Plan and applicable laws and regulations.
132
Exercise Price and Other Terms
The exercise price for stock options we grant is the fair market value of our common stock as defined in the Stock Plan,
which is the closing price on the day of the grant of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Stock options granted to
our employees (including Officers) typically have a term of 10 years. Annual grants of stock options generally vest on a quarterly
basis over four years following the date of grant. Options in lieu of cash bonus generally vest immediately on the date of grant.
Options in lieu of salary generally vest quarterly over one (1) year following the date of grant. On an infrequent basis, the Board
or the Committee has granted stock options to employees (including Officers) with different vesting patterns consistent with the
Stock Plan. The term and vesting of options granted to consultants vary depending on the circumstances.
Stock options, subject to required vesting, are exercisable for the term of the option so long as the optionee maintains
continuous status as an employee or consultant with the Company. Generally, we have granted options that provide that if an
optionee’s service to the Company as an employee, consultant or director terminates, such individual’s vested options will
remain exercisable for periods of between 60 days and one year, with special longer periods of ten years for certain director
options and for up to seven years for certain options granted in lieu of salary or director fees. The Administrator shall have the
authority to extend the period of time for which an option is to remain exercisable following optionee’s termination; provided that
in no event will an option be exercisable later than the expiration of the term of the option.
Benefits
Except as otherwise described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Officers are not entitled to benefits that are not
otherwise available to all of our employees. In this regard it should be noted that we do not provide pension arrangements (other
than our 401(k) plan), post-retirement health coverage or similar benefits for our Officers or employees.
The benefits we provided in fiscal 2023 were as follows. We provide life insurance to all employees who work at least 30
hours per week (including Officers) with a limit of three times the employee’s salary (up to $350,000 of insurance per employee).
In addition, we offer medical, dental and vision insurance, and provide accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short-
term and long-term disability insurance to all employees who work at least 30 hours per week. We pay for approximately 85% of
the total premium for medical, dental and vision insurance, respectively, and 100% of the total premium for accidental death and
dismemberment insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance. Our Officers, as with our employees, are eligible to
participate in our 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Post-Employment Compensation
Pension Benefits
We do not provide pension arrangements or post-retirement health coverage for our executives or employees. Our
executive officers, as with all eligible employees, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. We do not provide matching
contributions for any of our employees including our Officers.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not provide any nonqualified deferred contribution or other deferred compensation plans.
Other Post-Employment Payments
All of our employees, including our Officers, are employees-at-will and as such do not have employment contracts with us.
We also do not provide post-employment health coverage or other benefits, except in connection with the change of control
agreements, details of which are included below under “Change of Control Agreements.”
133
Most Recent Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
The Committee noted that at the 2023 Annual Meeting held on June 21, 2023, the Company’s executive compensation was
approved on a non-binding, advisory basis based upon the following votes:
For
10,721,628
Against
Abstain
Broker Non-Vote
518,082
246,229
6,952,044
The Board of Directors and the Committee reviewed these final vote results and determined that, given the significant level
of support, no changes to our executive compensation philosophy, policies and decisions were necessary based solely on the
vote results.
Tax and Accounting Implications
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
While Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, places a limit of $1 million on the amount of
compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our executive officers, except
with respect to certain grandfathered “performance-based” arrangements, the Committee retains the discretion to award
compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to maintain flexibility in our
approach to executive compensation in order to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting,
motivating and retaining key executives.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation is estimated at the date of grant based on the stock award’s fair value using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite period in a manner similar to other forms of
compensation paid to employees and directors. Our financial statements include more information regarding accounting for
stock-based compensation.
134
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table shows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, compensation awarded to or paid to, or
earned by, our Chief Executive Officer and our other Named Executive Officers.
In 2023 and 2022, we did not grant any stock awards and we do not currently offer pension or nonqualified deferred
compensation plans.
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2023
Name and Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
James E. Brown, D.V.M.
President and Chief Executive Officer
2023
2022
(4
586,416
)
574,918
Option
Awards
(1)($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(2)($)
All Other
Compensation
(3)($)
Total
($)
—
—
812,320
628,164
—
272,076
47,048
38,867
1,445,784
1,514,025
Timothy M. Papp
Chief Financial Officer
Norman L. Sussman
Chief Medical Officer
2023
2022
423,300
207,500
—
—
243,696
209,400
—
66,466
4,316
2,958
671,312
486,324
2023
2022
(5
421,599
)
413,332
—
—
182,772
261,736
—
131,873
50,107
42,740
654,478
849,681
(1)
(2)
Amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options computed in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 718 granted during the year indicated. For more information, please see Note 9 of the consolidated financial
statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 regarding assumptions underlying
the valuation of equity awards. The grant date fair value of the options was determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model based on the fair market value on the date of grant. These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these
stock options and do not represent the actual economic value that may be realized by each Named Executive Officer. There
can be no assurance that these amounts will ever be realized.
The amounts for 2022 represent the bonus payments made pursuant to our incentive plan based on the achievement of
certain pre-determined corporate objectives set by the Committee. The total calculated bonus award for fiscal year 2022
performance was paid 25% in cash and 75% in options to all employees (including our Named Executive Officers) relative
to 2022 performance. The total shares subject to each bonus option were determined by using a standard Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. On February 21, 2023, the Committee granted 50,665 bonus options (with a value of $203,086) to Dr.
Brown; 12,377 bonus options (with a value of $49,612) to Mr. Papp and 24,557 bonus options (with a value of $98,434) to
Dr. Sussman. The bonus options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of a share of the Company’s
common stock on the grant date ($5.07) and were fully vested upon the date of grant. For more information regarding the
awards made to each Named Executive Officer, see the section titled “Bonus (Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation)” of
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. There were no bonuses awarded to our Named Executive Officers
relative to 2023 performance.
Includes amounts associated with insurance premiums we pay for Accidental Death and Dismemberment, Life, Medical,
Dental, Vision, short-term and long-term disability insurance and medical insurance waiver incentives and remote internet
reimbursement starting in May 2021, which are available to all employees.
(4) Dr. Brown’s salary increased from $574,918 to $597,914 effective July 1, 2023.
(5) Mr. Papp’s salary increased from $415,000 to $431,600 effective July 1, 2023.
(6) Dr. Sussman’s salary increased from $413,332 to $429,865 effective July 1, 2023.
(3)
135
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR—EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, certain information regarding outstanding option
awards at fiscal year-end for our Named Executive Officers. All options were granted under our 2000 Stock Plan. In addition, there
were no stock awards outstanding for the individuals named below at December 31, 2023.
Outstanding Option Awards at December 31, 2023
Name
James E. Brown
Timothy M. Papp
Norman L. Sussman
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
14,999
11,706
4,807
24,999
3,703
19,999
4,807
16,720
14,567
22,499
4,717
18,821
24,999
22,175
14,999
21,092
14,368
—
41,829
50,665
37,500
—
18,750
12,377
11,250
—
15,000
—
6,874
—
17,428
24,557
8,437
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,407
6,531
—
53,781
—
162,500
—
41,250
—
48,750
—
5,000
—
3,126
—
22,409
—
36,563
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10,450
—
—
—
250,000
—
—
—
50,000
—
5,000
—
5,000
—
—
—
50,000
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
Option
Grant Date
Option
Expiration
Date (1)
20.90
20.90
13.60
8.80
17.50
11.60
13.50
11.60
13.10
13.10
14.00
12.40
12.40
5.77
5.77
21.10
20.30
20.30
8.71
5.07
5.07
3.32
4.52
5.07
5.07
3.32
17.70
17.70
20.30
20.30
8.71
5.07
5.07
3.32
1/31/2014(4)
1/31/2014(3)
3/28/2014(5)
1/09/2015(4)
3/26/2015(5)
1/28/2016(4)
3/31/2016(5)
1/28/2016(3)
1/9/2017(3)
1/9/2017(4)
6/19/17(5)
1/26/2018(3)
1/26/2018(4)
1/23/2019(3)
1/23/2019(4)
1/21/2020(4)
1/15/2021(4)
1/15/2021(7)
1/6/2022(4)
2/21/2023(3)
2/21/2023(4)
8/23/2023(7)
7/1/2022(2)
2/21/2023(3)
2/21/2023(4)
8/23/2023(7)
11/2/2020(2)
11/2/2020(7)
1/15/2021(4)
1/15/2021(7)
1/6/2022(4)
2/21/2023(3)
2/21/2023(4)
8/23/2023(7)
1/31/2024
1/31/2024
3/28/2024
1/09/2025
3/26/2025
1/28/2026
3/31/2026
1/28/2026
1/9/2027
1/9/2027
6/19/2027
1/26/2028
1/26/2028
1/23/2029
1/23/2029
1/21/2030
1/15/2031
1/15/2031
1/6/2032
2/21/2033
2/21/2033
8/23/2033
7/1/2032
2/21/2033
2/21/2033
8/23/2033
11/2/2030
11/2/2030
1/15/2031
1/15/2031
1/6/2032
2/21/2033
2/21/2033
8/23/2033
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
The original term of these option grants is ten (10) years from the date of grant.
The vesting schedule associated with these option grants is as follows: one-fourth (1/4) of the total shares subject to such
option shall vest on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, and one-sixteenth (1/16) of the total shares subject to
the option shall vest quarterly over three (3) years following the one-year anniversary, subject to continued service on each
applicable vesting date.
The vesting schedule associated with these option grants is as follows: 100% of the total shares subject to such option
vested on the date of grant.
The vesting schedule associated with these option grants is as follows: one-sixteenth (1/16) of the total shares subject to
the option shall vest quarterly over four (4) years following the date of grant, subject to continued service on each
applicable vesting date.
136
(5)
(6)
(7)
The vesting schedule associated with these option grants is as follows: one-fourth (1/4) of the total shares subject to the
option shall vest quarterly over one (1) year following the date of grant, subject to continued service on each applicable
vesting date.
The vesting schedule associated with the option grant is as follows: one forty-eighth (1/48) of the total shares subject to the
option shall vest monthly over four (4) years following the date of grant, subject to continued service on each applicable
vesting date.
The vesting schedule associated with these option grants is as follows: the performance-based stock option grants will vest
upon meeting certain specified development and regulatory milestones within specified time frames related to larsucosterol
for severe AH, with such vesting also subject to the optionee providing continuous service to the Company through the date
of the applicable vesting event.
137
CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS
We maintain a change of control policy applicable to our officers who hold the rank of Vice President and above (who are
not party to any other change of control agreement with us) which provides that, in the event that such officer’s employment is
terminated without cause or constructively terminated, in connection with and prior to a change in our control, or within twenty-
four months following a change in our control, then: (1) the unvested portion of any stock option held by such officer shall
automatically accelerate so as to become completely vested as of the effective date of the termination, and (2) such officer shall
receive a cash payment equal to one year of such officer’s then current notional salary, provided that such cash payment will be
equal to two years of such officer’s then current notional salary in the case of James E. Brown.
In December 2020, our Committee amended the change of control policy to, among other things, provide that cash
payments would be made in the form of a lump sum rather than installments over 12 months, make certain changes with respect
to the restrictive covenants required to earn severance benefits, and make certain other clarifying changes. The policy, as
amended, provides any such severance benefits are conditioned upon such officer delivering to us an effective release of claims
against us, complying with certain non-disparagement covenants, and cooperating with the Company in order to ensure an
orderly transfer of his or her duties and responsibilities. If the Officer breaches any of these requirements, the Company will have
no further obligation to pay to the Officer any benefit under this policy, and the Officer will be obligated to repay to the Company
all benefits previously paid to, or on behalf of, the Officer under this policy. The policy contains a “better after-tax” provision,
which provides that if any of the payments to an executive constitutes a parachute payment under Code Section 280G, the
payments will either be (i) reduced or (ii) provided in full to the executive, whichever results in the executive receiving the
greater amount after taking into consideration the payment of all taxes, including the excise tax under Code Section 4999. In
December 2023, our Compensation Committee reviewed the policy and no changes were made.
Had a change in control occurred during fiscal 2023 and had their employment been terminated on December 31, 2023,
our Named Executive Officers would have been eligible to receive the payments set forth in the columns under the heading
“Terminations Within 24 Months of a Change in Control” in the table below without taking into account the impact of the “better
after-tax” provision.
Terminations Within 24 Months of a Change in Control
Name
James E. Brown
Timothy M. Papp
Norman L. Sussman
Severance
Payments ($)
1,195,828
431,600
429,865
Value of
Accelerated
Unvested
Options
(1)($)
—
—
—
(1)
The value of accelerated vesting of the options is based solely on the excess, if any, of $0.59 per share, the closing
market price on December 31, 2023, over the exercise price of the unvested portion (as of December 31, 2023) of our
Named Executive Officers’ stock options. Because many of our stock options have exercise prices higher than our
current stock price, if our stock value was higher at the time of any actual termination of employment, additional stock
options could have considerable value.
Compensation Recovery Policy
In accordance with the final rules adopted by the SEC and Nasdaq implementing the incentive-based compensation
recovery provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, our Board approved the Company’s Corporation Compensation Recovery Policy,
effective as of October 2, 2023, which provides that in the
138
event the Company is required to restate any of its financial statements that have been filed with the SEC, then the
Compensation Committee will seek to recover any erroneously awarded performance-based incentive-based compensation
(including any performance-based cash and equity awards and salary increases earned wholly or in part based on the attainment
of financial performance goals) received by any person who is or was a Section 16 officer during the three-fiscal year recovery
period.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Overview of Compensation and Procedures
The Compensation Committee reviews the level of compensation of our non-employee directors on an annual basis. To
determine how appropriate the current level of compensation for our non-employee directors is, we have historically obtained
data from a number of different sources including:
•
•
•
publicly available data describing director compensation in peer companies;
survey data collected by our human resources department; and
information obtained directly from other companies.
We compensate non-employee members of the Board through a mixture of cash and equity-based compensation. In 2021,
the Compensation Committee retained Larry Setren & Associates, an independent compensation consulting firm, to analyze the
director compensation programs. Subsequent to this review, effective January 1, 2022, each non-employee director became
eligible to receive a cash retainer fee equal to $40,000 per year in addition to annual cash retainer fees for serving on the
following committees: (a) Audit Committee (retainer of $8,000 or $22,500 for the chairperson), (b) Compensation Committee
(retainer of $6,000 or $15,000 for the chairperson), (c) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (retainer of $5,000 or
$12,000 for the chairperson), and (d) Research and Development Committee ($7,500 or $15,000 for the chairperson). The cash
retainer fees are paid on a quarterly basis in arrears. In connection with her appointment as the Chair of the Board, effective
March 17, 2023, Ms. Maderis receives a cash retainer fee of $70,000 per year.
All of our current non-employee directors receive stock option grants under our 2000 Stock Plan as part of their
compensation for their service. When each non-employee director first becomes a director, he or she receives nonstatutory
options to purchase shares of our common stock covering 7,000 shares. These options have a ten-year term and become
exercisable in installments of one-third of the total number of shares granted on each anniversary of the grant. Additionally, each
director who had served for at least 6 months received options to purchase additional shares of our common stock on the date of
the annual stockholder meeting (Annual Grant) covering 5,500 shares, and such Annual Grant vests on the day before the first
anniversary of the date of grant of the Annual Grant.
Options granted on or after June 24, 2013 may be exercised only (1) while the individual is serving as a director on the
Board, (2) within 12 months after termination by death or disability or (3) within 24 months after the individual’s term as director
ends for any other reason. In 2019, the Board extended the post termination exercise period of approximately 238,644 vested
options held by non-employee directors who served on the Board for more than 10 years based on a policy adopted by the Board.
The policy stipulated that upon retirement of any member of the Board who has served on the Board for at least 10 years prior to
the effective date of such retirement, all options held by such directors shall continue to be exercisable until the earlier of (a) the
termination date of such option or (b) 10 years after such director's retirement date.
Employee directors receive no additional compensation for serving on our Board of Directors.
139
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation of each non-employee member of our Board
of Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
Director Compensation for Fiscal 2023
Name
Mohammad Azab, M.D., M. Sc., M.B.A.
Terrence F. Blaschke, M.D.
Gail M. Farfel, Ph.D.
Peter S. Garcia, M.B.A.
David R. Hoffmann (1)
Gail J. Maderis, M.B.A.
Judith J. Robertson
Fees
Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)
Option
Awards
(2)($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total ($)
58,500
60,000
47,500
61,613
38,909
86,629
60,000
23,115
23,115
23,115
23,115
—
23,115
23,115
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
81,615
83,115
70,615
84,728
38,909
109,744
83,115
(1)
(2)
Mr. David R. Hoffmann retired from the Board in June 2023.
Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock option awards. In June 2023, an option to
purchase 5,500 shares of our common stock at $5.29 per share was granted under our 2000 Stock Plan to each of the
directors (with a fair value of $23,115 for each option grant). For more information, please see Note 9 of the Notes to
Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 regarding the assumptions
underlying the valuation of equity awards.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2023 of all of our
non-employee directors:
Name
Mohammad Azab, M.D., M. Sc., M.B.A.
Terrence F. Blaschke, M.D.
Gail M. Farfel, Ph.D.
Peter S. Garcia, M.B.A.
Gail J. Maderis, M.B.A.
Judith J. Robertson
140
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Unexercisable
12,916
49,098
23,500
10,167
12,916
23,500
7,834
5,500
5,500
7,833
7,834
5,500
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table presents information concerning the beneficial ownership of the shares of our common stock as of
March 26, 2024 by:
•
•
•
•
each stockholder whom we know to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;
each of our directors;
each of our Named Executive Officers; and
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules and regulations of the SEC. Shares of common stock subject to options,
warrants and conversion privileges that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024 are deemed to
be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such options, warrants or convertible securities for the purpose of
computing the number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage ownership of that person, but are not deemed to be
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated in the footnotes to
this table, and subject to applicable community property laws, these persons have sole voting and investment power with respect
to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned are based on 31,035,981 shares of common stock outstanding as
of March 26, 2024. Except as otherwise noted, the address of each person listed in the table is c/o DURECT Corporation, 10240
Bubb Road, Cupertino, California 95014.
Name of Beneficial Owners
Holders of 5% or more of our common stock
Ingalls & Snyder, LLC (1)
Directors and Named Executive Officers
James E. Brown, D.V.M. (2)
Timothy M. Papp (3)
Norman L. Sussman (4)
Mohammad Azab, M.D., M. Sc., M.B.A. (5)
Terrence F. Blaschke, M.D. (6)
Gail M. Farfel, Ph.D. (7)
Peter S. Garcia, M.B.A. (8)
Gail J. Maderis, M.B.A. (9)
Judith J. Robertson (10)
All executive officers and directors as a group
(9 persons) (11)
Amount
and Nature
of Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of Common
Stock
2,558,012
8.2 %
639,882
57,377
87,551
21,250
50,756
33,500
17,167
35,250
59,113
1,001,846
2.0 %
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
3.2 %
* Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
(1)
Based upon a Schedule 13G filed by Ingalls & Snyder, LLC on March 27, 2024. Ingalls & Snyder, LLC is deemed to be the
beneficial owner with shared dispositive power over 2,558,012 shares of our common stock. The stockholder's address is
1325 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10019.
141
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Includes 176,453 shares of our common stock held by James E. Brown, 56,000 shares of our common stock held by the
James & Karen Brown 1998 Trust U/A and 8,000 shares of our common stock held by the James & Karen Brown 2006 Trust
U/A. Also includes 399,429 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of
March 26, 2024.
Includes 57,377 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of options exercisable by Timothy M. Papp within 60
days of March 26, 2024.
Includes 900 shares of our common stock held by Norman L. Sussman. Also includes 86,651 shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024.
Includes 6,000 shares of our common stock held by Mohammad Azab. Also includes 15,250 shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024.
Includes 2,800 shares of our common stock held by Terrence F. Blaschke and 300 shares of our common stock held by the
Terrence and Jeannette Blaschke Trust U/A dated November 11, 1993. Also includes 47,656 shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024.
Includes 10,000 shares of our common stock held by Gail M. Farfel. Also includes 23,500 shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024.
Includes 7,000 shares of our common stock held by Peter S. Garcia. Also includes 10,167 shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024.
Includes 20,000 shares of our common stock held by the Gail J. Maderis Revocable Trust dated April 8, 2013 Gail Maderis
TTEE. Also includes 20,000 shares of our common stock held by Gail J. Maderis. Also includes 15,250 shares of our common
stock issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024.
(10) Includes 35,613 shares of our common stock held by Judith J. Robertson. Also includes 23,500 shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024.
(11) Includes an aggregate of 678,780 shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock
options exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2024 held by all of our executive officers and directors as a group.
142
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2023 with respect to the shares of our common stock that may
be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan Category
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(a)
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(b)
Number of
Securities
Remaining Available
for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total
4,128,259 $
—
4,128,259 $
9.37
—
9.37
940,875 (2)
—
940,875
(1)
(2)
Consists of the following equity compensation plans: (i) our 2000 Stock Plan and (ii) our 2000 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan.
Includes 885,208 shares of our common stock reserved under our 2000 Stock Plan for future issuance, and includes 55,667
shares of our common stock reserved under our 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for future issuance, including shares
that will be purchased during the most recent purchase period under the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan commencing
on November 1, 2023 and ending on April 30, 2024.
143
Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS
In accordance with the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the terms
and conditions of all related party transactions (as defined in Item 404 of Reg. S-K), other than compensation transactions, which
are subject to the auspices of the Compensation Committee. Although we have not entered into any financial transactions with
any immediate family member of any of our directors or executive officers, if we were to do so, any such material financial
transaction would need to be approved by the Audit Committee before we enter into such a transaction. The Audit Committee
also reviews and approves our proxy statement and the information contained therein.
INDEPENDENCE OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
Under Nasdaq listing standards, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors
within a specified period of the closing of the Company's initial public offering. In addition, the rules of Nasdaq require that,
subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate
governance committees be independent. Under the rules of Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in
the opinion of that company’s board of directors, the director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise
of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In
order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not,
other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors or any other board committee: (1)
accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its
subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries. We currently satisfy the audit
committee independence requirements of Rule 10A-3. Additionally, Compensation Committee members must not have a
relationship with us that is material to the director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of
a Compensation Committee member.
Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director and considered whether each director has a
material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her
responsibilities. As a result of this review, our Board determined that each of our directors who served during 2023 or is currently
serving, other than Dr. Brown and Dr. Farfel, was or is an independent director as defined under the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
During the last fiscal year, we granted options to purchase common stock to our employees and directors as reported in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. Such agreements
require us, among other things, to indemnify our officers and directors, other than for liabilities arising from willful misconduct of
a culpable nature, and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceedings against them as to which they could be
indemnified.
144
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
FEES BILLED FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm and principal accountants, billed the fees set forth below. All Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and Other
Fees for 2023 and 2022 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee according to the policies and procedures described above
under the caption “The Board, Board Committees and Meetings—Audit Committee.”
Audit Fees
Tax Fees
Total
Audit Fees
Years Ended
December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
1,238,524 $
83,298
1,321,822 $
974,200
76,146
1,050,346
Audit Fees include fees for audit services associated with the 2023 and 2022 audits of our annual financial statements and
the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Audit Fees also include fees for advice on
audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of annual and interim financial
statements, respectively. Additionally, the 2023 and 2022 Audit Fees include approximately $97,500 and $74,000, respectively,
related to the review of SEC registration statements, issuance of comfort letters, and issuance of consents.
Tax Fees
Tax fees include tax compliance services related to preparation of tax returns, assistance with filing of employee retention
credits with the Internal Revenue Service and other tax matters.
145
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements
PART IV
The Index to financial statements in Item 8 of this report is incorporated herein by reference as the list of the financial
statements required as part of this report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not
applicable or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information
required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) The list of exhibits are filed as part of or furnished with this annual report on Form 10-K as applicable.
146
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Index
Description
3.1
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on November 4, 2010).
3.2
3.3
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on June 20, 2018).
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on June 16, 2021).
3.4
Certificate of Correction to the Charter Amendment of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, as filed with the SEC on June 25, 2021).
3.5
3.6
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on June 16, 2022).
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 8, 2023).
3.7
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on December 17, 2014).
3.8
3.9
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating Preferred Stock of the Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended (File No. 333-128979),
as initially filed with the SEC on October 13, 2005).
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating Preferred Stock
of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615), as
filed with the SEC on August 5, 2010).
4.1*
Description of Securities of the Registrant Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
4.2
4.3
Form of Warrant (February 2023) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on February 7, 2023).
Form of Pre-Funded Warrant (February 2023) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on February 7, 2023).
147
Exhibit
Number
4.4
Form of Warrant (July 2023) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as
filed with the SEC on July 21, 2023).
Description
10.1+
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its Officers and Directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-35316),
as initially filed with the SEC on April 20, 2000).
10.2+
2000 Stock Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K, as filed with the SEC on June 16, 2022).
10.3+
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-31615) filed on June 22, 2023).
10.4
Modified Net Single Tenant Lease Agreement between the Company and DeAnza Enterprises, Ltd. dated as of
February 18, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form
S-1, as amended (File No. 333-35316), as initially filed with the SEC on April 20, 2000).
10.5
Lease between the Company and Renault & Handley Employee Investments Co. with commencement date of
January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File
No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on March 11, 2004).
10.6
First Lease Extension between the Company and Renault & Handley Employee Investments Co. effective March 1,
2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-
31615), as filed with the SEC on May 7, 2009).
10.7
Second Amendment to Lease between De Anza Enterprises and the Company dated as of August 6, 2009
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615),
as filed with the SEC on November 2, 2009).
10.8
Third Amendment to Lease between De Anza Enterprises and the Company dated as of December 21, 2010
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-31615), as
filed with the SEC on March 3, 2011).
10.9
Fourth Amendment to Lease between De Anza Enterprises and the Company dated as of August 20, 2013
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.71 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615),
as filed with the SEC on November 5, 2013).
10.10
Addendum II to Lease between the Company and Northwest Asset Management Company dated as of August 27,
2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.72 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-
31615), as filed with the SEC on November 5, 2013).
148
Exhibit
Number
10.11
Second Amendment to Lease between Handley Management Corporation, as successor-by-merger to Renault &
Handley Employee Investments Co. and the Company dated November 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.73 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on
February 28, 2014).
Description
10.12**
Exclusive License Agreement between the Company and Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property
Foundation dated December 5, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on March 3, 2015).
10.13
Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Oxford Finance LLC dated July 28, 2016. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the
SEC on November 1, 2016).
10.14
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Oxford Finance LLC dated February
28, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with SEC
on March 5, 2018).
10.15
Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Oxford Finance LLC dated
November 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed
with the SEC November 5, 2018).
10.16
Addendum III to Lease between the Company and Northwest Asset Management Company dated as of April 10,
2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-
31615), as filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018).
10.17
Fifth Amendment to Lease between De Anza Enterprises and the Company dated as of August 15, 2018
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on
August 17, 2018).
10.18
Third Amendment to Lease between Handley Management Corporation, as successor-by-merger to Renault &
Handley Employee Investments Co. and the Company dated September 17, 2018 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on September 21, 2018).
10.19
10.20
Amendment No. 1 to Exclusive License Agreement between the Company and Virginia Commonwealth University
Intellectual Property Foundation dated July 2, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on November 8, 2018).
Amendment No. 2 to Exclusive License Agreement between the Company and Virginia Commonwealth University
Intellectual Property Foundation dated March 6, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on November 8, 2018).
149
Exhibit
Number
Description
10.21
Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Oxford Finance LLC dated
December 31, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as
filed with the SEC on January 6, 2020).
10.22+
Executive Change of Control Policy, as amended December 9, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-31615), as filed with the SEC on March 5, 2021).
10.23
Fourth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Oxford Finance LLC dated March 3,
2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-
31615), as filed with the SEC on March 8, 2022).
10.24
Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Oxford Finance LLC dated May 28,
2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the
SEC on June 2, 2021).
10.25++ License agreement by and between the Company and Innocoll Pharmaceuticals Limited dated December 21, 2021
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-31615), as
filed with the SEC on March 8, 2022).
10.26
First Amendment to License Agreement by and between the Company and Innocoll Pharmaceuticals Limited dated
September 19, 2022 (incorporated by reference Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-31615) filed with the SEC on November 3, 2022).
10.27+
Offer letter between Timothy M. Papp and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on July 5, 2022).
10.28+
Offer letter between Norman L. Sussman and the Company dated October 12, 2020 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on November 2, 2022).
10.29+
Employment Agreement with James E. Brown (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-35316), as initially filed with the SEC on April 20,
2000).
10.30
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 3, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on February 7, 2023).
10.31
Addendum IV to Lease between the Company and Wescove Vacaville, LLC dated as of May 11, 2023 (incorporated
by reference Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615) filed with the SEC
on August 10, 2023).
10.32
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 19, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on July 21, 2023).
150
Exhibit
Number
Description
10.33
Sixth amendment to Lease between the Company and De Anza Enterprises LLC dated as of September 6, 2023
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-31615),
as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2023).
23.1*
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1*
Rule 13a-14(a) Section 302 Certification.
31.2*
Rule 13a-14(a) Section 302 Certification.
32.1***
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
32.2***
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
97.1*
Company Compensation Recovery Policy
101
The following financial statements from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2023, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, (ii)
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022
and 2021, (iii) Condensed Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and
2021, (iv) Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 and (v)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and including detailed tags.
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
* Filed herewith.
** Confidential treatment granted with respect to certain portions of this Exhibit.
*** Furnished, not filed.
+ Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
++ Certain portions of this exhibit (indicated by “[***]”) have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
The Company has elected not to include summary information.
151
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
DURECT CORPORATION
By:
/S/ JAMES E. BROWN
James E. Brown
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 28, 2024
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ JAMES E. BROWN
James E. Brown
/s/ TIMOTHY M. PAPP
Timothy M. Papp
/s/ MOHAMMAD AZAB
Mohammad Azab
/s/ TERRENCE F. BLASCHKE
Terrence F. Blaschke
/s/ GAIL M. FARFEL
Gail M. Farfel
/s/ PETER S. GARCIA
Peter S. Garcia
/s/ GAIL J. MADERIS
Gail J. Maderis
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 28, 2024
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
Director
Director
March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024
Director, Chair of the Board
March 28, 2024
/s/ JUDITH J. ROBERTSON
Director
March 28, 2024
Judith J. Robertson
152