Enservco Corporation Annual Report 2017

← All annual reports

FY2017 Annual Report · Enservco Corporation

Loading PDF…

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION EDGAR FILING

Enservco Corp

Form: 10-K

Date Filed: 2018-03-22

Corporate Issuer CIK: 319458

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X]

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from _______ to ______

Commission file number: 001-36335

ENSERVCO CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

501 South Cherry St., Ste. 1000
Denver, CO
(Address of principal executive offices)

84-0811316
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

80246
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (303) 333-3678

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act:

Title of each class
Common stock, $0.005 par value

Name of each exchange on which registered
NYSE American

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act: ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark if the r egistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act: ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the regis trant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the be st of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-
K. ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting com pany)

Accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes ☐ No ☑

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $12.2 million based upon the closing sale price of
the Registrants Common Stock of $ 0.31 as of June 30, 2017, the last trading day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter. This
determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of March 15, 2018, there were 51,263,334 shares of the Enservco Corporation ’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the registrant ’s definitive information statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later
than 120 days after the registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, in connection with the registrant’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, are
incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.

Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.

Item 15.
Item 16.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Description of Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures

PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information

PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Summary of Form 10-K

5
16
29
29
30
30

31
34
34
47
47
73
73
74

74
74
74
75
75

75
77

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “ forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “anticipate,” “should,” “could,” “project,” “intend,”
“estimate,” “expect,” “believe,” “predict,” “budget,” “goal,” “plan,” “forecast,” “target” and other similar expressions.

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this annual report are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from what is expressed
in or indicated by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including, among
others, the risks set forth in the section of this annual report entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere throughout this annual report, as well as the following factors:

•

capital requirements and uncertainty of obtaining additional funding on terms acceptable to us;

our ability to negotiate with our lender under our credit agreement in seeking to waive potential bank agreement covenant violations and to receive
more favorable covenant terms and maintain or allow more borrowing capacity;
price volatility of oil and natural gas prices, and the effect that lower oil and natural gas prices may have on our customers ’ demand for our services,
the result of which may adversely impact our revenues and stockholders' equity;
a decline in oil or natural gas production, and the impact of genera l economic conditions on the demand for oil and natural gas and the availability of
capital which may impact our ability to perform services for our customers;
the broad geographical diversity of our operations which, while expected to diversify the risks related to a slow-down in one area of operations, also
adds significantly to our costs of doing business;
constraints on us as a result of our substantial indebtedness, including restrictions imposed on us under the terms of our credit facility agreement and
our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to repay our debt obligations;
our history of losses and working capital deficits which, at times, were significant;

weather and environmental conditions, including abnormal warm winters in our areas of operations that adversely impact demand for our services;

reliance on a limited number of customers;

our ability to retain key members of our management and key technical employees;

impact of environmental, health and safety and other governmental regulations, and of current or pending legislation with which we and our
customers must comply;
developments in the global economy;

changes in tax laws;

the effects of competition;

the effect of seasonal factors;

risks relating to any unforeseen liabilities;

federal and state initiatives relating to the regulation of hydraulic fracturing; and

further sales or issuances of our common stock and the price and volume volatility of our common stock.

All forward-looking statements, express or implied, contained in this annual report are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.
This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons
acting on our behalf may issue. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this annual report.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

PART I

Enservco Corporation (“ Enservco”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”, “we” or “us”) provides various services
to the domestic onshore oil and natural gas industry. These services include frac water heating, hot oiling and acidizing (well enhancement services); water
transfer and water treatment (water transfer services); water hauling, fluid disposal, frac tank rental (water hauling services); and, excavating, grading, and dirt
hauling services (construction services). The Company owns and operates a fleet of more than 630 specialized trucks, trailers, frac tanks and other well-site
related equipment and serves customers in several major domestic oil and gas fields including the DJ Basin/Niobrara area in Colorado, the Bakken area in
North Dakota, the Marcellus and Utica Shale area in Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Jonah Field, Green River and Powder River Basins in Wyoming, the Eagle
Ford Shale and Austin Chalk in Texas, the Mississippi Lime and Hugoton field area in Kansas and the Stack and Scoop plays in the Anadarko Basin in
Oklahoma.

Enservco was originally in corporated as Aspen Exploration Corporation under Delaware law on February 28, 1980 for the primary purpose of acquiring,
exploring and developing oil and natural gas and other mineral properties. During the first half of 2009, Aspen disposed of its oil and natural gas producing
assets and as a result was no longer engaged in active business operations. On June 24, 2010, Aspen entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization with Dillco Fluid Service, Inc. (“Dillco”) which set forth the terms by which Dillco became a wholly owned subsidiary of Aspen on July 27, 2010.
On December 30, 2010, Aspen changed its name to “Enservco Corporation.”

The Company’s executive (or corporate) offices are located at 501 South Cherry St., Ste. 1000, Denver, CO 80246. Our telephone number is (303) 333-

3678, and our facsimile number is (720) 974-3417. Our website is www.enservco.com.

Corporate Structure

The below table provides an overview of the Company ’s current subsidiaries and their activities.

Name
Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC (“ Heat
Waves”)

State of
Formation

Ownership

Business

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Oil and natural gas well services, including logistics and
stimulation.

Dillco Fluid Service, Inc.

Kansas

100% by Enservco

Oil and natural gas field fluid logistic services primarily in the
Hugoton field area in western Kansas and northwestern
Oklahoma.

Heat Waves Water Management LLC
(“HWWM”)

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Water Transfer and Water Treatment Services

HE Services, LLC (“HES”)

Nevada

100% by Heat Waves

Real GC, LLC (“ Real GC”)

Colorado

100% by Heat Waves

No active business operations. Owns construction
equipment used by Heat Waves.

No active business operations. Owns real property in Garden
City, Kansas that is used by Heat Waves.

transfer
In November 2015, HWWM was organized under Colorado law as a wholly owned subsidiary of Enservco for the purpose of launching a water
service division. Effective January 1, 2016, HWWM acquired various water transfer assets from WET Oil Services, LLC (‘WET”) including vehicles, high and low
volume pumps, manifolds, pipe, and other support equipment. In addition, effective January 1, 2016, HWWM acquired water treatment equipment which utilizes
technology in devices sold under the name of HydroFLOW and various water transfer assets including high and low volume pumps, lay flat hose, trailers,
generators, pipe and other equipment from HII Technologies, Inc. and its affiliates (“HIIT”). The total purchase price for both acquisitions was approximately $4.3
million. HydroFLOW products offer water treatment services based on patented hydropath technology that can remove bacteria and scale from water using
electrical induction to reduce or eliminate down-hole scaling and corrosion. HWWM provides water transfer services and water treatment services to the onshore
oil and natural gas sector.

Overview of Business Operations

Enservco primarily conducts its business operations through its principal operating subsidiaries (Heat Waves, HWWM, and Dillco), which provide oil field
services to the domestic onshore oil and natural gas industry. These services include frac water heating, hot oiling, pressure testing, acidizing, water transfer,
bacteria and scale treatment, freshwater and saltwater hauling, fluid disposal, frac tank rental, well site construction and other general oil field services. As
described in the table above, certain assets utilized by Heat Waves, HWWM, and Dillco in their business operations are owned by other subsidiary entities. The
Company currently operates in the following geographic regions:

• Rocky Mountain Region, including eastern Colorado and southern Wyoming (D-J Basin and Niobrara formations), central Wyoming (Powder River and

Green River Basins), northwestern New Mexico (San Juan Basin), and western North Dakota and eastern Montana (Bakken area). The Rocky Mountain
Region operations are deployed from Heat Waves’ operations centers in Killdeer, ND; Rock Springs, WY; and, Platteville, CO.

• Eastern USA Region, including the southern region of the Marcellus Shale formation (southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia) and the Utica

Shale formation in eastern Ohio. The Eastern USA Region operations are deployed from Heat Waves’ operations center in Carmichaels, PA.

• Central USA Region, including the Mississippi Lime and Hugoton area in southwestern Kansas, Texas panhandle, and northwestern Oklahoma, and the

Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk in south Texas. The Central USA Region operations are deployed from operations centers in Garden City and Hugoton,
KS; Okarche, OK; and in Bryan and Jourdanton, TX.

Historically, the Company focused its growth strategy on strategic acquisitions of operating companies and expansion of services through capital
investment consisting of the acquisition and fabrication of property and equipment. That strategy also included expanding into new geographical territories as well
as expanding the services it provides. These strategies are exemplified by these activities:

(1)

(2)

From 2014 through 2016, the Company spent approximately $33.7 million for the acquisition and fabrication of additional frac water heating, hot
oiling, and acidizing equipment; and

To expand its footprint, in early 2010 Heat Waves began providing services in the Marcellus Shale natural gas field in southwestern
Pennsylvania and West Virginia, and in September 2011 Heat Waves extended its services into the D-J Basin / Niobrara formation and the
Bakken formation through opening new operation centers in southern Wyoming and western North Dakota, respectively. In late 2012 the
Company expanded its operations, through its Pennsylvania operation center, into the Utica Shale formation in eastern Ohio. Also, in early 2015
the Company expanded its operations into the Eagle Ford formation through opening a new operations center in southern Texas. During 2017,
the Company expanded operations in southern Texas by opening a new operations center In Bryan, Texas.

(3)

To expand its services, in January 2016, Enservco acquired various water transfer assets for approximately $4.3 million in order to provide
water transfer services and bacteria and scaling treatment solutions to its customers in all of its operating areas.

The years 2014 through early 2017 were challenging for us. The decline in drilling, completion and service activities throughout the industry that started in
2014 and continued during most of 2016 due to low oil and natural gas prices resulted in significantly reduced demand for our services in 2015 and 2016.
Positive developments occurred in 2017 as industry conditions improved, with increased and stable commodity prices and an increase in completion and
production activities, which we believe had an impact on us beginning with our fourth quarter 2017 results. To fund operations through the downturn and into the
recent recovery, we have relied on cash provided by various lenders, including senior lenders pursuant to our credit facilities. Our borrowing balance historically
peaks early in the first quarter of the year as the increase in our direct variable costs related to our frac water heating services are incurred and paid. During the
latter portion of the first quarter and throughout the second quarter we convert the related receivables into cash which we use to reduce our outstanding
borrowings. As of March 15, 2018, we had approximately $25.7 million outstanding and $4.1 million available under our revolving credit facility.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further information.

As the domestic onshore oil and natural gas industry continues the current recovery, the Company expects to continue to pursue its growth strategies by
increasing utilization of its existing fleet of equipment, increasing the volume and scope of current services offered to our new and existing customers, exploring
acquisitions relating to existing or complimentary service lines as capital and market conditions permit, expanding the geographic areas in which it operates, and
making further investments in adding to its assets and equipment.

Operating Entities

As noted above, E nservco conducts its business operations and holds assets primarily through its subsidiary entities. The following describes the

operations and assets of Enservco’s operating subsidiaries.

Dillco. From its inception in 1974, Dillco has focused primarily on providing water hauling/disposal/storage services, well site construction services and
frac tank rental to energy companies working in the Hugoton gas field in southwestern Kansas and northwestern Oklahoma. Water hauling and disposal services
have been the primary sources of Dillco’s revenue. Dillco currently owns and operates a fleet of water hauling trucks and related assets, including specialized
tank trucks, frac tanks, water disposal wells, construction and other related equipment. These assets transport, store and dispose of both fresh and salt water, as
well as provide well site construction and maintenance services.

Heat Waves. Heat Waves provides a range of well stimulation/maintenance services to a diverse group of independent and major oil and natural gas

companies. The primary services provided are intended to:

(1)

(2)

Assist in the fracturing of formations for newly drilled oil and natural gas wells; and

Help maintain and enhance the production of existing well s throughout their productive life.

These services consist of frac water heating, hot oiling and acidizing. Heat Waves also provides some water hauling and well site construction services.
Heat Waves’ operations are currently in the major oil and natural gas areas in Colorado, Kansas, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
Texas, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

HWWM. HWWM was organized in November 2015 as a new wholly owned subsidiary of Enservco for the purpose of launching a new water

management division. In connection therewith, HWWM acquired approximately $4.3 million of water management assets from HIIT and WET in January 2016.

HWWM provides water transfer services, bacteria and scaling treatment soluti ons, and equipment rental to customers in the oil and natural gas industry.
Water transfer entails using high and low volume pumps, lay flat hose, aluminum pipe and manifolds to move fresh and/or recycled water from a water source
such as a well, pond, lake, river, stream, or water storage facility to frac tanks at drilling locations to be used in connection with well completion activities. In
addition to providing traditional water transfer services, HWWM also utilized a patented hydropath technology (distributed under the name of HydroFLOW) to
provide bacteria and scaling treatment services to the oil and gas industry. HydroFLOW utilizes electrical induction to reduce or eliminate down-hole scaling and
corrosion and to reduce or eliminate bacteria in water. The hydropath technology is owned by HydroPath Holdings Limited. Pursuant to a Sales Agreement with
the North American master distributor, HydroFLOW U.S.A., HWWM had the exclusive right to sell or rent HydroFLOW devices in connection with bacteria
deactivation and scale treatment services for treating injection and disposal wells, fracking water and recycled water in the oil and gas industry to customers in
the United States (except in Texas where the right regarding injection and disposal wells is exclusive to only 20 companies but non-exclusive for the remaining
companies in Texas). HydroFLOW has a potentially lower-cost and environmentally friendly alternative to conventional chemical treatment of frac and recycled
water which could significantly reduce the use, and therefore cost, of chemicals now used by oil and gas companies; however, in 2017 demand for the
technology did not support our previous purchase commitments to HydroFLOW. Therefore, as of January 1, 2018, HWWM terminated its agreement with
HydroFLOW.

Areas of Operations

The following map shows the primary areas in which the Company currently operates.

Business Segments

Enservco, through its operating subsidiaries, provides a range of services to owners and operators of oil and natural gas wells in the following business

segments.

Well Enhancement Services

The Company’s well enhancement services consist of frac water heating, acidizing, hot oiling services, and pressure testing. These services are provided
primarily by Heat Waves which, as of December 31, 2017 utilized a fleet of approximately 240 custom designed trucks and other related equipment. Heat
Waves’ operations are currently in southwestern Kansas, northwestern Oklahoma, Texas panhandle, southern Wyoming (Niobrara), Colorado (D-J Basin),
southwestern Pennsylvania/northwestern West Virginia (Marcellus Shale), eastern Ohio (Utica Shale), western North Dakota and eastern Montana (Bakken
formation), and southern Texas (Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk). Well enhancement services accounted for approximately 85% and 73% of the Company’s
total revenues for fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Frac Water Heating – Frac Water Heating is the process of heating water used in connection with the fracturing process of completing a well. Fracturing
services are intended to enhance the production from crude oil and natural gas wells through the creation of conductive flowpaths to enable the hydrocarbons to
reach the wellbore where the natural flow has been restricted by underground formations. The fracturing process consists of pumping a fluid slurry, which largely
consists of fresh water and a proppant into a well at sufficient pressure to fracture (i.e. create conductive flowpaths) the formation. To ensure these solutions are
properly mixed and can flow freely, during certain parts of the year the water frequently needs to be heated to a sufficient temperature as determined by the well
owner/operator. As of December 31, 2017, Heat Waves owned and operated a fleet of 52 frac heaters (or the equivalent of 80 burner boxes) designed to heat
large amounts of water.

Acidizing - Acidizing entails pumping large volumes of specially formulated acids and/or chemicals into a well to dissolve materials blocking the flow of
the crude oil or natural gas. The acid is pumped into the well under pressure. Acidizing is most often used to increase permeability throughout the formation,
clean up formation damage near the wellbore caused by drilling, and to remove buildup of materials restricting the flow of crude oil and gas through perforations
in the well casing. For most customers, Heat Waves supplies the acid solution and also pumps that solution into a given well. As of December 31, 2017, Heat
Waves owned and operated a fleet of 7 acidizing units which consist of a specially designed acid pump truck and an acid transport trailer.

Hot Oil Services – Hot oil services involve the circulation of a heated fluid, typically oil, to dissolve, melt, or dislodge paraffin or other hydrocarbon
deposits from the tubing of a producing well. Paraffin deposits build up over time from normal production operations, although the rate at which this paraffin
builds up depends on the chemical character of the crude oil or natural gas being produced. These services are performed by circulating and heating oil from a
well through a hot oil truck and then pumping it down the casing and back up the tubing to remove the deposits.

Hot oil servicing also includes the heating of oil storage tanks. The heating of storage tanks is done (i) to eliminate frozen water and other soluble waste
in the tank for which the operator’s revenue is reduced at the refinery; and (ii) because heated oil flows more efficiently from the tanks to transports taking oil to
the refineries in colder weather.

As of December 31, 2017, Heat Waves owned and operated a fleet of 57 hot oil trucks. Based on customer needs and seasonal conditions, these

vehicles are deployed among the service regions as necessary in seeking to maximize their productive time.

Pressure Testing – Pressure testing consists of pumping fluids into new or existing wells or other components of the well system such as flow lines to

detect leaks. Hot oil trucks and pressure trucks are used to perform this service.

Water Transfer Services

Water transfer services consists primarily of water transfer services. These services commenced in first quarter of 2016 with revenue being generated in
the fourth quarter of 2016 after acquisition of water transfer assets from WET and HIIT in January 2016. Water transfer services accounted for approximately 5%
and 1% of the Company’s total revenues for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Water Transfer Services – Water transfer entails using high and low volume pumps, lay flat hose, aluminum pipe and manifolds to move fresh and/or

recycled water from a water source such as a pond, lake, river, stream, or storage facility to frac tanks at drilling locations to be used in connection with fracking
activities. Water transfer differs from water hauling in that water transfer is typically used in connection with well completion activities and involves moving water
via pumps, hoses and pipes whereas water hauling involves moving water via bobtail trucks or water transports for either service or completion work.

Water Hauling Services

Water hauling services include water hauling, salt water disposal, and frac tank rental services. These services are primarily provided by Dillco to

customers in the Hugoton gas field in western Kansas and northwestern Oklahoma. Water hauling services accounted for approximately 9% and 16% of the
Company’s total revenues for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Water Hauling – As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned or leased, and operated approximately 67 water hauling trucks and trailers equipped
with pumps to move water from/to wells, tanks and other storage facilities. A majority of the Company’s trucks consist of transports with a hauling capacity of up
to 130 barrels (each barrel being equal to 42 U.S. gallons). The trucks are used to:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Transport water to fill frac tanks on well locations,

Transport contaminated water produced as a by-product of producing wells to disposal wells, including disposal wells that we own and operate,
and
Transport drilling and completion fluids to and from well locations; following completion of fracturing operations, the trucks are used to transport
the flow-back produced as a result of the fracturing process from the well site to disposal wells.

Most wells produce residual salt or fresh water in conjunction with the extraction of the oil or natural gas. The Company ’s trucks pick up water at the well
site and transport it to a disposal well for injection or to other environmentally sound surface recycling facilities. This is regular maintenance work that is
performed on a periodic basis depending on the volume of water a well produces.

Typically, the Company and a customer enter into a contract for water hauling services after that customer has completed a competitive bidding process.
In these instances, we are our customers' "first call" for services, and work is performed for the customer based on agreed-upon rates and actual work performed.
In other certain instances, customers with requirements for minor or incidental water hauling services usually purchase the services on a “call out” basis and
charged according to a published schedule of rates. The Company competes for services on both a call out and contractual basis.

Disposal Well Services – The Company owns four disposal wells in Kansas and Oklahoma that allow for the injection of salt water and incidental non-

hazardous oil and natural gas wastes. These wells are used exclusively by the Company for its customers.

Our trucks frequently transport fluids to be disposed of into these disposal wells. These wells a re located in proximity to our customers’ producing wells.
Most oil and natural gas wells produce varying amounts of water throughout their productive lives. In the states in which we operate, oil and natural gas wastes
and water produced from oil and natural gas wells are required by law to be disposed of in authorized facilities, including permitted water disposal wells. All of the
Company’s disposal wells are licensed by state authorities pursuant to guidelines and regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Safe Drinking
Water Act and are completed in an environmentally sound manner in permeable formations below the fresh water table.

Frac Tank Rental – The Company also generates a small amount of revenues from the rental of frac tanks in the Hugoton field area. As of December
31, 2017, the Company owned approximately 26 frac tanks, which can store up to 500 barrels of water and are used by oilfield operators to store fluids at the well
site, including fresh water, salt water, and acid for frac jobs, flowback, temporary production and mud storage. Frac tanks are used during all phases of the life of
a producing well. The Company generally rents frac tanks at daily rates and charges hourly rates for the transportation of the tanks to and from the well site.

Construction Services

Construction services consist of excavation, grading and dirt hauling services. These services are primarily provided in Colorado to help increase
utilization of the Company’s equipment and personnel during the slower non-heating months. This segment also utilizes sub-contractors as needed to
supplement Company resources. Construction services accounted for approximately 1% and 11% of the Company’s total revenues for fiscal 2017 and 2016,
respectively.

Ownership of Company Assets

The Company owns various equipment and other assets to provide its services and products. Substantially all of the equipment and personal property

assets owned by these entities are subject to security interests from loans and credit facilities utilized by the Company.

Historically, as supply and demand require , the Company has leased additional trucks and equipment from time to time. These leases are generally for
periods of less than one year, and therefore are treated as operating leases for accounting purposes, and the rent expense associated with these leases is
reported ratably over the term of the lease.

Competitive Business Conditions

We face intense competition in our operations. Competition is influenced by factors such as price, capacity, the quality/safety-record/availability of
equipment and work crews, and the reputation and experience of the service provider. The Company believes that an important competitive factor in establishing
and maintaining long-term customer relationships is having an experienced, skilled, and well-trained work force that is responsive to our customers’ needs.
Although we believe customers consider all of these factors, price is often the primary factor in determining which service provider is awarded work.

The demand for our services fluctuates primarily in relation to the domestic commodity price (or anticipated price) of oil a nd natural gas which, in turn, is
largely driven by the domestic and worldwide supply of, and demand for, oil and natural gas, political events, as well as speculation within the financial markets.
Demand and prices are often volatile and difficult to predict and depend on events that are not within our control. Generally, as supply of oil and natural gas
decreases and demand increases, service and maintenance requirements increase as oil and natural gas producers drill new wells and attempt to maximize the
productivity of their existing wells to take advantage of the higher priced environment. Conversely, as the supply of commodities increase and demand and crude
oil and natural gas prices fall, oil and gas producers drill fewer wells and scale back or suspend service and maintenance work.

The Company’s competition primarily consists of small and large regional or local contractors. The Company attempts to differentiate itself from its
competition in large part through its range and quality of services it has the capability to provide. The Company invests a significant amount of capital into
purchasing, developing, and maintaining a fleet of trucks and other equipment that are critical to the services it provides. Further, the Company concentrates on
providing services to a diverse group of major and independent oil and natural gas companies in a number of geographical areas. We believe we have been
successful using this business model and believe it will enable us to grow our business in the event the oil and gas industry has continuing need for the type of
service we provide.

Dependence on One or a Few Major Customers

The Company serves numerous major and independent oil and natural gas companies that are active in our core areas of ope rations.

As of December 31, 2017, a receivable from one customer comprised more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance; at approximately

11%. Revenues from this customer represented 8% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017.

While the Company believes its equipment could be redeployed in the current market environment if it lost any material customers, such loss could have
an adverse effect on the Company’s business until the equipment is redeployed. We believe that the market for the Company’s services is sufficiently diversified
that it is not dependent on any single customer or a few major customers.

Seasonality

A significant portion of the Company’s operations is impacted by seasonal factors, particularly with regard to its frac water heating and hot oiling services.
In 2017, approximately 69% of revenue was earned during the first and fourth quarters. In regard to frac water heating, because customers rely on Heat Waves
to heat large amounts of water for use in fracturing formations, demand for this service is much greater in the colder months. Similarly, hot oiling services are in
higher demand during the colder months when they are needed for maintenance of existing wells and to heat oil storage tanks.

Acidizing and p ressure testing are performed throughout the year with higher revenues typically during non-winter months.

Water hauling from producing wells is not as seasonal as our other services since wells produce water whenever they are pumping regardless of
weather conditions. Hauling of water for the drilling or fracturing of wells is also not seasonal but dependent on when customers decide to drill or complete wells.

Although they are relatively new businesses to us, we believe water transfer services are not seasonal. However, our water transfer services depend

upon the level of drilling, well completion, and production activities.

Raw Materials

The Company purchases a wide variety of raw materials, parts, and components that are made by other manufacturers and suppliers for our use. The
Company is not dependent on any single source of supply for those parts, supplies or materials. However, there are a limited number of vendors for propane and
certain acids and chemicals. The Company utilizes a limited number of suppliers and service providers available to fabricate and/or construct the trucks and
equipment used in its hot oiling, frac water heating, and acid related services.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements or Labor Contracts

The Company enters into agreements with local property owners where its disposal wells are located by which the Company genera lly agrees to pay
those property owners a fixed amount per month plus a percentage of revenues derived from utilizing those wells. The terms of these agreements are separately
negotiated with each property owner, and during its 2017 and 2016 fiscal years the total amount paid under these various agreements by the Company was
immaterial to the Company and its business operations.

As is the situation with all companies in the frac water heating service business, we rely on certain procedures and pract

ices in performing our services.
In 2016, we were issued our first patent relating to an aspect of the frac water heating process. We have other patent applications pending regarding other
procedures used in our process of heating frac water. We are aware that one unrelated company has been awarded four patents related, in part, to a process for
heating of frac water. For a further discussion of this, see Item 3 – Litigation, below.

Pursuant to a Sales Agreement with HydroFLOW USA (“ Sales Agreement”), HWWM had the exclusive right to sell or rent patented hydropath devices in
connection with bacteria deactivation and scale treatment services for treating injection and disposal wells, frack water and recycled water in the oil and gas
industry to customers in the United States. The hydropath technology is owned by HydroPath Holdings Limited. Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, the Company
was required to pay royalties on certain rental transactions and was required to meet certain annual purchase commitments in order to maintain the exclusivity
provision under the Sales Agreement. As of December 31, 2017, no royalties had been paid under the Sales agreement. As of January 1, 2018, HWWM
terminated its agreement with HydroFLOW USA.

Government Regulation

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to a variety of government regulations ranging from environmental to OSHA to the Department of
Transportation. Our operations are also subject to stringent federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise
relating to health and safety or the protection of the environment. These federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment,
wildlife protection, historic preservation, and health and safety are extensive and changing. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation is
generally toward stricter standards, and we expect that this trend will continue as the governmental agencies issue and amend existing regulations. Failure to
comply with these laws and regulations as they currently exist or may be amended in the future may result in the assessment of substantial administrative, civil
and criminal penalties, as well as the issuance of injunctions limiting or prohibiting activities. Strict adherence with these regulatory requirements increases our
cost of doing business and consequently affects our profitability. The Company does not believe that it is in material violation of any regulations that would have a
significant negative impact on the Company’s operations.

Through the routine course of providing services, the Company handles and stores bulk quantities of hazardous materials. If leaks or spills of hazardous
materials handled, transported or stored by us occur, the Company may be responsible under applicable environmental laws for costs of remediating any
damage to the surface or sub-surface (including aquifers).

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabilit y Act (“CERCLA”), also known as “Superfund,” and comparable state statutes
impose strict, joint and several liability on owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of “hazardous substances”
found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring cleanup actions, demands for reimbursement for government-incurred cleanup
costs, or natural resource damages, or for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused
by hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, and comparable state statutes
govern the disposal of “solid waste” and “hazardous waste” and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as
requirements for corrective actions. Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of “hazardous substance,” state laws affecting our
operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum-related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil field wastes as
“non-hazardous,” such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent
handling and disposal requirements. CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found
on drilling and production sites long after operations on such sites have been completed. Other statutes relating to the storage and handling of pollutants include
the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, which requires certain owners and operators of facilities that store or otherwise handle oil to prepare and implement spill
response plans relating to the potential discharge of oil into surface waters. The OPA contains numerous requirements relating to prevention of, reporting of, and
response to oil spills into waters of the United States. State laws mandate oil cleanup programs with respect to contaminated soil. A failure to comply with OPA’s
requirements or inadequate cooperation during a spill response action may subject a responsible party to civil or criminal enforcement actions.

In the course of the Company’s operations, it does not typically generate materials that are considered “hazardous substances.” One exception,
however, would be spills that occur prior to well treatment materials being circulated down hole. For example, if the Company spills acid on a roadway as a result
of a vehicle accident in the course of providing well enhancement/stimulation services, or if a tank with acid leaks prior to down hole circulation, the spilled
material may be considered a “hazardous substance.” In this respect, the Company may occasionally be considered to “generate” materials that are regulated as
hazardous substances and, as a result, may incur CERCLA liability for cleanup costs. Also, claims may be filed for personal injury and property damage allegedly
caused by the release of hazardous substances or other pollutants.

The Clean Water Act (the “CWA”), and comparable state statutes, impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants, including spills and
leaks of oil and other substances, into waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the
terms of a permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) or an analogous state agency. The CWA regulates storm water run-off from oil and
natural gas facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit for certain activities. Such a permit requires the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm
water run-off from its operations. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other
waters of the United States unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and
administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of oil and other pollutants and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of
cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release.

The Safe Drinking Water Act (the “ SDWA”), and the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the drilling and
operation of subsurface injection wells, such as the disposal wells owned and operated by the Company. The EPA directly administers the UIC program in some
states and in others the responsibility for the program has been delegated to the state. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal
well. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by oil and natural gas drilling, production, and related operations may result in fines,
penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SWDA and state laws. In addition, third party claims may be filed by landowners
and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages, and bodily injury.

Regulations in the states in which the Company owns and operates water injection wells (Kansas and Okl ahoma) require us to obtain a permit to
operate each of our disposal wells. The applicable regulatory agency may suspend or modify one of our permits if the Company’s well operations are likely to
result in pollution of freshwater, substantial violation of permit conditions or applicable rules, or if the well leaks into the environment.

The Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended the SDWA to exclude hydraulic fracturing from the definition of “ underground injection” under certain
circumstances. However, the repeal of this exclusion has been advocated by certain advocacy organizations and others in the public. The EPA at the request of
Congress conducted a national study examining the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources and issued a final assessment report in
December 2016, which concluded that hydraulic fracturing activities can impact drinking water resources under some circumstances and identifies factors that
influence these impacts.

We incur, and expect to continue to incur, capital and operating costs to comply with t he environmental laws and regulations described herein. The

technical requirements of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly complex, stringent and expensive to implement.

If new federal or state laws or regulations that significantly rest rict hydraulic fracturing are adopted, such legal requirements could result in delays,
eliminate certain drilling and injection activities, make it more difficult or costly for our customers to perform fracturing and increase their and our costs of
compliance and doing business. It is also possible that drilling and injection operations utilizing our services could adversely affect the environment, which could
result in a requirement to perform investigations or clean-ups or in the incurrence of other unexpected material costs or liabilities.

Significant studies and research have been devoted to climate change and global warming, and climate change has developed into a major political issue
in the United States and globally. Certain research suggests that greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change and pose a threat to the environment.
Recent scientific research and political debate has focused in part on carbon dioxide and methane incidental to oil and natural gas exploration and production.
Many state governments have enacted legislation directed at controlling greenhouse gas emissions, and future state and federal legislation and regulation could
impose additional restrictions or requirements in connection with our operations and favor use of alternative energy sources, which could increase operating
costs and decrease demand for oil products. As such, our business could be materially adversely affected by domestic and international legislation targeted at
controlling climate change.

We are also subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, and
comparable state laws, whose purpose is to protect the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA
community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the federal Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act and comparable state statutes require that
information be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local
government authorities and citizens.

Because our trucks travel over public highways to get to customers ’ wells, the Company is subject to the regulations of the Department of
Transportation. These regulations are very comprehensive and cover a wide variety of subjects from the maintenance and operation of vehicles to driver
qualifications to safety. Violations of these regulations can result in penalties ranging from monetary fines to a restriction on the use of the vehicles. Under
regulations effective July 1, 2010, an uncured violation of regulations could result in a shutdown of all of the vehicles of Heat Waves, Dillco or HWWM. The
Company does not believe it is in violation of Department of Transportation regulations at this time that would result in a shutdown of vehicles.

Some states and certain municipalities have regulated, or are considering regulating hydraulic fracturing (“ fracking”) which, if accomplished, could impact
certain of our operations. While the Company does not believe that existing regulations and contemplated actions to limit or prohibit fracking have impacted its
activities to date, there can be no assurance that these actions, if taken on a wider scale, may not adversely impact the Company’s business operations and
revenues.

Employees

As of February 28, 2018, the Company employed 249 full time employees. Of these employees, 170 are employed by Heat Waves, 37 by Dillco, 27 by

HWWM, and 15 are employed by Enservco. From time to time, the Company may hire contractors to perform work.

Available Information

We maintain a website at http://www.enservco.com. The information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not part of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically
file such reports with, or furnish those reports to, the SEC.

In addition, we maintain our corporate governance documents on our website, including our:

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees which contains information regarding our whistleblower procedures,

Insider Trading Policy,

Audit Committee Charter,

•

• Compensation Committee Charter,
Trading Blackout Policy, and
•

•

Related Party Transaction Policy.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The Company’s securities are highly speculative and involve a high degree of risk, including among other items the risk factors described below. The

below risk factors are intended to generally describe certain risks that could materially affect the Company and its current business operations and activities.

You should carefully consider the risks described below and elsewhere herein in connection with any decision whether to acquire, hold or sell the
Company’s securities. The following list identifies and briefly summarizes certain risk but should not be viewed as complete or comprehensive. If any of the
contingencies discussed in the following paragraphs or other materially adverse events actually occur, the business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or a significant part of your
investment.

Operations Rel ated Risks

Our business is materially impacted by seasonal weather conditions.

Our businesses, particularly our frac heating and hot oil services, are impacted by weather conditions and temperatures. Unseasonably warm weather
during winter months reduces demand for the heating services and results in higher operating costs, as a percentage of revenue, due to the need to retain
equipment operators during these low demand periods. The Company has experienced unseasonably warm weather during parts of its heating season during
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, which has impacted well enhancement service revenues and profits. Management makes concerted efforts to
reduce costs during these low demand periods by utilizing operators in other business segments, reducing hours, and some instances utilizing seasonal layoffs.

Further, during the winter months, our customers may delay operations or we may not be able to operate or mo ve our equipment between locations
during periods of heavy snow, ice or rain, and during the spring some areas impose transportation restrictions due to the muddy conditions caused by the spring
thaws.

We may be unable to implement price increases or ma intain existing prices on our core services.

We periodically seek to increase the prices of our services to offset rising costs and to generate increased revenues. We operate in a very competitive
industry and, as a result, we are not always successful in raising or maintaining our existing prices. Additionally, during periods of increased market demand, a
significant amount of new equipment may enter the market, which would also put pressure on the pricing of our services. Even when we are able to increase our
prices, we may not be able to do so at a rate that is sufficient to offset rising costs. Also, we may not be able to successfully increase prices without adversely
affecting our activity levels. The inability to maintain our prices or to increase the prices of our services to offset rising costs increase could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

We participate in a capital-intensive industry. We may not be able to finance future growth of our operations or future acquisitions.

Our business activities require substantial capital expenditures. If our cash flow from operating activities and borrowings under our existing credit facility
were not sufficient to fund our capital expenditure budget, we would be required to reduce these expenditures or to fund these expenditures through new debt or
equity issuances.

Our a bility to raise new debt or equity capital or to refinance or restructure our debt at any given time depends, among other things, on the condition of
the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Also, the terms of existing or future debt or equity instruments could further restrict our business
operations. The inability to finance future growth could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Increased labor costs or the unavailability of skilled workers could hurt our operations.

Companies in our industry, including us, are dependent upon the available labor pool of skilled workers. We compete with other oilfield services
businesses and other employers to attract and retain qualified personnel with the technical skills and experience required to provide our customers with the
highest quality service. We are also subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs such matters as minimum wage, overtime and other working
conditions, and which can increase our labor costs or subject us to liabilities to our employees. A shortage in the labor pool of skilled workers or other general
inflationary pressures or changes in applicable laws and regulations could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain personnel and could require us to
enhance our wage and benefits packages. Labor costs may increase in the future or we may not be able to reduce wages when demand and pricing falls, and
such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Historically, we have experienced a high employee turnover rate. Any difficulty we experience replacing or adding workers could adversely

affect our business.

We believe that the high turnover rate in our industry is attributable to the nature of oilfield services work, which is physically demanding and performed
outdoors, and to the seasonality of certain of our segments. As a result, workers may choose to pursue employment in areas that offer a more desirable work
environment at wage rates that are competitive with ours. The potential inability or lack of desire by workers to commute to our facilities and job sites, as well as
the competition for workers from competitors or other industries, are factors that could negatively affect our ability to attract and retain skilled workers. We may
not be able to recruit, train and retain an adequate number of workers to replace departing workers. The inability to maintain an adequate workforce could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards may be subject to limitation and may result in increased future tax liability.

Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, contain rules that limit the ability of a corporation that undergoes
an “ownership change” to utilize its net operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”) and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. An
“ownership change” is generally defined as any change in ownership of more than 50% of a corporation’s stock over a rolling three-year period by stockholders
that own (directly or indirectly) 5% or more of the stock of the corporation, or arising from a new issuance of stock by the corporation. If an ownership change
occurs, Section 382 generally imposes an annual limitation on the use of pre-ownership change net operating losses, or NOLs, credits and certain other tax
attributes to offset taxable income earned after the ownership change. The annual limitation is equal to the product of the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate
and the value of the corporation’s stock immediately before the ownership change. This annual limitation may be adjusted to reflect any unused annual limitation
for prior years and certain recognized built-in gains for the year. In addition, Section 383 generally limits the amount of tax liability in any post-ownership change
year that can be reduced by pre-ownership change tax credit carryforwards. If we were to experience an "ownership change," this could result in increased U.S.
federal income tax liability for us if we generate taxable income after the ownership change. Limitations on the use of NOLs and other tax attributes could also
increase our state tax liabilities. The use of our tax attributes will also be limited to the extent that we do not generate positive taxable income in future tax
periods. As a result of these limitations, we may be unable to offset future taxable income, if any, with NOLs before such NOLs expire. Accordingly, these
limitations may increase our federal and state income tax liabilities.

As of December 31, 2017, we had U.S. federal NOLs of approximately $20.3 million and state NOLs of approximately $ 24.5 million.

New U.S. tax legislation could adversely affect us and our shareholders.

On December 22, 2017, legislation referred to as the Tax Act was signed into law. The Tax Act is generally effective for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2017. The Tax Act includes significant amendments to the Internal Revenue Code, including amendments that significantly change the taxation of
business entities, including the deductibility of interest. Some of the amendments could adversely affect our business and financial condition, including by limiting
our ability to realize tax benefits from our NOLs, however we expect that, ultimately, the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% should be
beneficial to the Company.

Our business depends on domestic (United States) spending by the crude oil and natural gas industry which has suffered significant negative
price volatility since July 2014, and such volatility may continue; our business has been, and may in the future be, adversely affected by industry and
financial market conditions that are beyond our control.

We depend on our customers’ ability and willingness to make operating and capital expenditures to explore, develop and produce crude oil and natural
gas in the United States. Customers’ expectations for future crude oil and natural gas prices, as well as the availability of capital for operating and capital
expenditures, may cause them to curtail spending, thereby reducing demand for our services and equipment. Major declines in oil and natural gas prices since
July 2014 (when prices were at approximately $100 per barrel) have resulted in substantial declines in capital spending and drilling programs across the industry.
As a result of the declines in oil and natural gas prices, most exploration and production companies shut down or substantially reduced drilling programs and
required service providers to make pricing concessions. Over the two years ended December 31, 2017, the Company offered pricing concessions to a number of
customers. Typically, these concessions have been made with the intent to maintain existing service volumes and/or develop additional business.

Industry conditions and specifically the market price for crude oil and natural gas are influenced by numerous domestic and global factors over which the
Company has no control, such as the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, domestic and worldwide economic conditions, weather conditions, political
instability in oil and natural gas producing countries, and merger and divestiture activity among oil and natural gas producers. The volatility of the oil and natural
gas industry and the consequent impact on commodity prices as well as exploration and production activity could adversely impact the level of drilling and activity
by some of our customers. Where declining prices lead to reduced exploration and development activities in the Company’s market areas, the reduction in
exploration and development activities also may have a negative long-term impact on the Company’s business. Continued decline in oil and natural gas prices
may result in increased pressure from our customers to make additional pricing concessions in the future and may impact our borrowing arrangements with our
principal bank. There can be no assurance that the prices we charge to our customers will return to former levels.

There has also been significant political pressures for the United State s economy to reduce its dependence on crude oil and natural gas due to the
perceived impacts on climate change. Furthermore, there have been significant political and regulatory efforts to reduce or eliminate hydraulic fracturing
operations in certain of the Company’s service areas, particularly in Colorado. These activities may make oil and gas investment and production less attractive.

Higher oil and gas prices do not necessarily result in increased drilling activity because our customers ’ expectation of future prices also drives demand
for drilling services. Oil and gas prices, as well as demand for the Company’s services, also depend upon other factors that are beyond the Company’s control,
including the following:

•

Supply and demand for crude oil and natural gas;

political pressures against crude oil and natural gas exploration and production;

cost of exploring for, producing, and delivering oil and natural gas;

expectations regarding future energy prices;

advancements in exploration and development technology;

adoption or repeal of laws regulating oil and gas production in the U.S.;

imposition or lifting of economic sanctions against foreign companies;

weather conditions;

rate of discovery of new oil and natural gas reserves;

tax policy regarding the oil and gas industry;

development and use of alternative energy sources; and

the ability of oil and gas companies to generate funds or otherwise obtain external capital for pr ojects and production operations.

Ongoing volatility and uncertainty in the domestic and global economic and political environments have caused the oilfield services industry to
experience volatility in terms of demand. While our management is generally optimistic for the continuing development of the onshore North American oil and
gas industry, there are a number of political and economic pressures negatively impacting the economics of continuing production from some existing wells,
future drilling operations, and the willingness of banks and investors to provide capital to participants in the oil and gas industry. These cuts in spending will
continue to curtail drilling programs as well as discretionary spending on well services, and will continue to result in a reduction in the demand for the Company’s
services, the rates we can charge, and equipment utilization. In addition, certain of the Company’s customers could become unable to pay their suppliers,
including the Company. Any of these conditions or events could adversely affect our operating results.

Our success depends on key members of our management, the loss of any executive or key personnel could disrupt our business operations.

We depend to a large extent on the services of certain of our executive officers. The loss of the services of Ian Dickinson, Austin Peitz, Dustin Bradford
or other key personnel, could disrupt our operations. Although we have entered or intend to enter into employment agreements with Messrs. Dickinson, Peitz
and Bradford, that contain, among other things non-compete and confidentiality provisions, we may not be able to enforce the non-compete and/or confidentiality
provisions in the employment agreements.

We depend on several significant cu stomers, and a loss of one or more significant customers could adversely affect our results of

operations.

The Company’s top five customers accounted for approximately 43 % and 52% of its total annual revenues for 2017 and 2016, respectively. The loss of
any one of these customers or a sustained decrease in demand by any of such customers could result in a substantial loss of revenues and could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

While the Company believes our equipment could be redeployed in the current market environment if we lost any material customers, such loss could
have an adverse effect on the Company’s business until the equipment is redeployed. We believe that the market for the Company’s services is sufficiently
diversified that it is not dependent on any single customer or a few major customers.

Demand for the majority of our services is substantially dependent o n the levels of expenditures by the domestic oil and natural gas industry.
The Company has no influence over its customers’ capital expenditures. On-going economic volatility could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Beginning in the second half of 2014, oil prices declined substantially from historical highs, causing many of our customers to reduce or delay their oil
and natural gas exploration and production spending in 2015 and 2016, which consequently reduced their demand for our services, and exerted downward
pressure on the prices we charged for our services and products.

Also, an environment of increasing oil and natural gas prices can lead to increasing costs of exploring for and producing oil and natural gas. Though the
addition of frac stimulation into the domestic oil and gas industry has somewhat reduced the overall costs of producing oil and natural gas, the price of drill rigs,
pipe, other equipment, fluids, and oil field services and the cost to companies like the Company of providing those services, has generally increased along
with increases in oil and natural gas prices. The reduction in cash flows experienced by our customers during periods of lower oil and natural gas prices and the
increase of the costs of exploring for and producing oil and natural gas as noted above could have significant adverse effects on the financial condition of some
of our customers. This could result in project modifications, delays or cancellations, general business disruptions, and delay in, or nonpayment of, amounts that
are owed to the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities could reduce our earnings and cash available for operations.

We are subject to increasingly stringent laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and the importation and use of hazardous materials,
including laws and regulations governing air emissions, water discharges and waste management. Government authorities have the power to enforce
compliance with their regulations, and violations are subject to fines, injunctions or both. We incur, and expect to continue to incur, capital and operating costs to
comply with environmental laws and regulations. The technical requirements of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly complex, stringent and
expensive to implement. These laws may provide for “strict liability” for damages to natural resources or threats to public health and safety. Strict liability can
render a party liable for damages without regard to negligence or fault on the part of the party. Some environmental laws provide for joint and several strict
liability for remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances.

The Company uses hazardous substances and transports hazardous wastes in its operations. Accordingly, we could become subject to potentially
material liabilities relating to the investigation and cleanup of contaminated properties, and to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as the result of
exposures to, or releases of, hazardous substances. In addition, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, new laws and regulations, the discovery of
previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new or increased requirements could require the Company to incur costs and penalties, or become the
basis of new or increased liabilities that could reduce its earnings and cash available for operations. The Company believes it is currently in compliance with
environmental laws and regulations.

Intense competition within the well services industry may adversely affect our ability to market our services.

The well services industry is intensely competitive. It includes numerous small companies capable of competing effectively in our markets on a local
basis, as well as several large companies that possess substantially greater financial and other resources than the Company. The Company’s larger competitors
have greater resources that allow those competitors to compete more effectively than the Company. The Company’s small competitors may be able to react to
market conditions more quickly. The amount of equipment available may exceed demand at some point in time, which could result in active price competition.

The Company could be impacted by unfavorable results of legal proceedings, such as being found to have infringed on intellectual property

rights.

As is the situation with other companies in the frac water heating service business, we rely on certain procedures and practices in performing our
services. In 2016, we were issued our first patent relating to an aspect of the frac water heating process and in 2017, a second patent was issued. We have other
patent applications pending regarding other procedures used in our process of heating frac water. We are aware that one unrelated company (the “Patent
Owner”) has been awarded four patents related, in part, to a process for heating of frac water. The Patent Owner is currently in litigation with two different groups
of energy companies that are seeking to invalidate the first patent. A North Dakota court has issued a summary judgment that the first patent owned by the
Patent Owner is invalid. The same Court also found that this first patent is unenforceable due to inequitable conduct by the Patent Owner and/or the inventor.
The Patent Owner has filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to appeal this judgment and other adverse judgments and orders by
the North Dakota court. As of March 15, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has not issued a ruling on this case.

In October 2014, the Company was served with a complaint that alleges that Ens ervco and Heat Waves, in offering and selling frac water heating
services, infringed and induced others to infringe two patents owned by the Patent Owner including the first patent ruled invalid and unenforceable by the North
Dakota Court. The complaint seeks various remedies including injunctive relief and unspecified damages and relates to only a portion of Heat Waves’ frac water
heating services. Heat Waves has answered the complaint, denied the Patent Owner’s allegations of infringement and asserted counterclaims asking the Court
to find, among other things, that it does not infringe either patent and that both patents are invalid. The Patent Owner has replied to and denied those
counterclaims. In July 2015, a Colorado Court granted a joint request by Enservco, Heat Waves and the Patent Owner to stay the case. The lawsuit is now
stayed pending the outcome of the appeal by the Patent Owner of the summary judgment invalidating the Patent Owner’s first patent as set forth above. (See
Item 3 – Litigation, for more information about this matter.)

However, if Enservco and/or Heat Waves are found to be infringing, they could be liable for the payment of substantial damages/royalties and attorneys ’

fees, and/or be subject to a preliminary or permanent injunction prohibiting Heat Waves from heating frac water in a manner it may have been using.

Our operations are subject to inherent risks, some of which are beyond our control. These risks may be self-insured, or may not be fully

covered under our insurance policies, but to the extent not covered, are self-insured by the Company.

Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the oil and natural gas industry, such as, but not limited to, accidents, blowouts, explosions, fires and

oil spills. These conditions can cause:

■ Personal injury or loss of life,
■ Damage to or destruction of property, equipment and the environment, and
■ Suspension of operations by our customers.

The occurrence of a significant event or adverse claim in excess of the insurance coverage that we maintain or that is not covered by insurance could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, claims for loss of oil and natural gas production and damage to
formations can occur in the well services industry. Litigation arising from a catastrophic occurrence at a location where our equipment and services are being
used may result in us being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting large claims.

The Company maintains insurance coverage that we believe to be customary in the industry against these hazards. In addition, in June 2015, the
Company became self-insured under its Employee Group Medical Plan for the first $50,000 per individual participant. However, we do not have insurance
against all foreseeable risks, either because insurance is not available or because of the high premium costs. The occurrence of an event not fully insured
against, or the failure of an insurer to meet its insurance obligations, could result in substantial losses. In addition, we may not be able to maintain adequate
insurance in the future at reasonable rates. Insurance may not be available to cover any or all of the risks to which we are subject, or, even if available, it may be
inadequate, or insurance premiums or other costs could rise significantly in the future so as to make such insurance prohibitively expensive. It is likely that, in our
insurance renewals, our premiums and deductibles will be higher, and certain insurance coverage either will be unavailable or considerably more expensive than
it has been in the recent past. In addition, our insurance is subject to coverage limits, and some policies exclude coverage for damages resulting from
environmental contamination.

While our growth strategy includes seeking acquisitions of other oilfield services companies, we may not be successful in identifying,

making and integrating business or asset acquisitions, if any, in the future.

We anticipate that a component of our growth strategy may be to make geographically focu sed acquisitions of businesses or assets aimed to strengthen
our presence and expand services offered in selected regional markets. Pursuit of this strategy may be restricted by the on-going volatility and uncertainty within
the credit markets which may significantly limit the availability of funds for such acquisitions. Our ability to use shares of our common stock in an acquisition
transaction may be adversely affected by the volatility in the price of our stock.

In addition to restricted funding availability, the success of this strategy will depend on our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates and to
negotiate acceptable financial and other terms. There is no assurance that we will be able to do so. The success of an acquisition also depends on our ability to
perform adequate due diligence before the acquisition and on our ability to integrate the acquisition after it is completed. While the Company intends to commit
significant resources to ensure that it conducts comprehensive due diligence, there can be no assurance that all potential risks and liabilities will be identified in
connection with an acquisition. Similarly, while we expect to commit substantial resources, including management time and effort, to integrating acquired
businesses into ours, there is no assurance that we will be successful in integrating these businesses. In particular, it is important that the Company be able to
retain both key personnel of the acquired business and its customer base. A loss of either key personnel or customers could negatively impact the future
operating results of any acquired business.

In January 2016, HWWM, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired various assets including the water transfer assets of HIIT and WET for

approximately $4.3 million.

Compliance with climate change legislation or initiatives could negatively impact our business.

The U.S. Congress has considered legislation to mandate reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and certain states have already implemented, or
may be in the process of implementing, similar legislation. Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court has held in its decisions that carbon dioxide can be regulated as
an “air pollutant” under the Clean Air Act, which could result in future regulations even if the U.S. Congress does not adopt new legislation regarding emissions.
At this time, it is not possible to predict how legislation or new federal or state government mandates regarding the emission of greenhouse gases could impact
our business; however, any such future laws or regulations could require us or our customers to devote potentially material amounts of capital or other
resources in order to comply with such regulations. These expenditures could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.

Anti-fracking initiatives could adversely impact our business.

Some states and certain municipalities have regulated, or are considering regulating fracking which, if accomplished, could impact certain of our
operations. While the Company does not believe that these regulations and contemplated actions to limit or prohibit fracking have impacted its activities to date,
there can be no assurance that these actions, if taken on a wider scale, may not adversely impact the Company’s business operations and revenues.

Debt Related Risks

Our indebtedness, which is currently collateralized by substantial ly all of our assets, could restrict our operations and make us more

vulnerable to adverse economic conditions.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company owed approximately $30.0 million to banks, financial institutions, and other parties under various collateralized

debt obligations.

Our current and future indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:

■ Impair our ability to make investments and obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general

corporate purposes,

■ Limit our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to make

principal and interest payments on our indebtedness,

■ Make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business, our industry or the economy in general as a substantial portion of our operating cash flow
will be required to make principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, making it more difficult to react to changes in our business and in
industry and market conditions,

■ Put us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors that have less debt, or

■ Increase our vulnerability to interest rate increases to the extent that we incur additional variable rate indebtedness.

If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or are otherwise unable to obtain the funds required to make principal and interest payments on our
indebtedness, or if we otherwise fail to comply with the various debt service covenants and/or reporting covenants in the business loan agreements or other
instruments governing our current or any future indebtedness, we could be in default under the terms of our credit facilities or such other instruments.

The availability of borrowings under our credit facility is based on a borrowing base which is subject to redetermination by our lender based on a number
of factors and the lender’s internal credit criteria. In the event the amount outstanding under our credit facility at any time exceeds the borrowing base at such
time, we may be required to repay a portion of our outstanding borrowings on an accelerated basis.

In the event of a default, the holders of our indebtedness could elect to declare all the funds borrowed under those instruments to be due and payable
together with accrued and unpaid interest, the lenders under our credit facility could elect to terminate their commitments there-under and we or one or more of
our subsidiaries could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. Any of the foregoing consequences could restrict our ability to grow our business and cause the
value of our common stock to decline.

We may be unable to meet the obligations of various financial covenants that are contained in the terms of our loan agreements with our

principal lender, East West Bank.

The Company’s agreements with East West Bank impose various obligations and financial covenants on the Company. The outstanding amount under
the Amended Loan and Security Agreement, entered into with East West Bank in August 2017 and amended in November 2017 is due in August 2020. The
revolving credit agreement with East West Bank has a variable interest rate and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries.

Further, the related ag reements with East West Bank impose various financial covenants on the Company including maintaining a prescribed fixed
charge coverage ratio, a minimum liquidity ratio at certain times, and limit the Company's ability to make capital investments. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to comply with these covenants in the future, or that if we violate a covenant East West Bank would be willing to provide a waiver of such covenant.
Violation of these covenants could result in the acceleration of maturities under the default provisions of our loan and security agreement. As of December 31,
2017, we were in compliance with all financial covenants.

The variable rate indebtedness with East West Bank subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to

increase significantly.

The Company’s borrowings through East West Bank bear interest at variable rates, exposing the Company to interest rate risk. As of December 31,
2017, the Company had not yet entered into a hedging arrangement to protect against the interest rate risk associated with the remaining balance of the senior
revolving credit facility.

Our debt obligations, which may increase in the fu ture, may reduce our financial and operating flexibility.

As of December 31, 2017, we had borrowed approximately $27.1 million under our senior revolving credit facility and had approximately $2.1 million of
borrowing capacity available under this facility. Although the Company plans to utilize cash flow from operations during the first half of 2018 to reduce our
outstanding borrowings, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. If the Company is unable to reduce debt as planned or new debt or other
liabilities are added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face would increase.

A high level of indebtedness subjects us to a number of adverse risks. In particular, a high level of indebtedness may make it more likel y that a reduction
in the borrowing base of our credit facility following a periodic redetermination could require us to repay a portion of outstanding borrowings, may impair our
ability to obtain additional financing in the future, and increases the risk that we may default on our debt obligations. In addition, we may be required to devote a
significant portion of our cash flows to servicing our debt, and we are subject to interest rate risk under our credit facility, which bears interest at variable rates.
An increase in our interest rates could have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Our ability to meet our debt obligations and to reduce our level of indebtedness depends on our future performance. General economic conditions, oil and
natural gas prices and financial, business and other factors affect our operations and our future performance. Many of these factors are beyond our control. If we
do not have sufficient funds on hand to pay our debt when due, we may be required to seek a waiver or amendment from our lenders, refinance our
indebtedness, incur additional indebtedness, sell assets or sell additional shares of securities. We may not be able to complete such transactions on terms
acceptable to us, or at all. Our failure to generate sufficient funds to pay our debts or to undertake any of these actions successfully could result in a default on
our debt obligations, which would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

We have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Stockholders may not receive funds without selling their

shares.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to
pay down debt and finance the expansion of our business. Our future dividend policy is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon
various factors, including our business, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and investment opportunities. In addition, we have agreed
with East West Bank, our principal lender that we will not pay any cash dividends on our common stock until our obligations to East West Bank are paid in full.
Accordingly, realization of a gain on a shareholder’s investment will depend on the appreciation of the price of our common stock.

Our board of directors can, without stockholder approval, cause preferred stock to be issued on terms that adversely affect holders of our

common stock.

Under our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which none are issued
and outstanding as of the date of this annual report. Also, our board of directors, without stockholder approval, may determine the price, rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares. If our board of directors causes shares of preferred stock to be issued, the rights of the holders
of our common stock would likely be subordinate to those of preferred holders and therefore could be adversely affected. Our board of directors’ ability to
determine the terms of preferred stock and to cause its issuance, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate
purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Preferred shares issued by our
board of directors could include voting rights or super voting rights, which could shift the ability to control the Company to the holders of the preferred stock.
Preferred stock could also have conversion rights into shares of our common stock at a discount to the market price of our common stock, which could negatively
affect the market for our common stock. In addition, preferred stock would have preference in the event of liquidation of the corporation, which means that the
holders of preferred stock would be entitled to receive the net assets of the corporation distributed in liquidation before the holders of our common stock receive
any distribution of the liquidated assets. We have no current plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

The price of our common stock may be volatile regardless of our operating performan ce, and you may not be able to resell shares of our

common stock at or above the price you paid or at all.

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price at which you paid. Our s tock
price volatility can be in response to a number of factors, including those listed in this section and elsewhere in this annual report. Many of these volatility factors
are beyond our control. Other factors that may affect the market price of our common stock include:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations;
liquidity;
sales of our common stock by our stockholders;
changes in oil and natural gas prices;
changes in our cash flow from operations or earnings estimates;
publication of research reports about us or the oil and natural gas exploration, production and service industry generally;
competition from other oil and gas service companies and for, among other things, capital and skilled personnel;
increases in market interest rates which may increase our cost of capital;
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings, and enforcement and legal actions;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur in the future;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
actions by our stockholders;

•
•
•
•
•
•

commencement of or involvement in litigation;
news reports relating to trends, concerns, technological or competitive developments, regulatory changes, and other related issues in our industry;
speculation in the press or investment community regarding our business;
political conditions in oil and natural gas producing regions;
general market and economic conditions; and
domestic and international economic, legal, and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance.

In addition, the U.S. securities markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the
operating performance of companies in these markets. Market fluctuations and broad market, economic and industry factors may negatively affect the price of
our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Any volatility or a significant decrease in the market price of our common stock could also
negatively affect our ability to make acquisitions using our common stock. Further, if we were to be the object of securities class action litigation as a result of
volatility in our common stock price or for other reasons, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources, which
could negatively affect our financial results.

Our existing shareholders could experience further dilution if we elect to raise equity capital to meet our liquidity needs or finance a strategic

transaction.

As part of our strategy we may desire to raise c apital and or utilize our common stock to effect strategic business transactions. Either such action will
likely require that we issue equity (or debt) securities which would result in dilution to our existing stockholders. Although we will attempt to minimize the dilutive
impact of any future capital-raising activities or business transactions, we cannot offer any assurance that we will be able to do so. If we are successful in raising
additional working capital, we may have to issue additional shares of our common stock at prices at a discount from the then-current market price of our common
stock.

The value of our common stock may decline significantly if we are unable to maintain our NYSE American listing.

Our common stock has recently sold and may continue to sell at a price per share well below $1.00. The NYSE American rules contain requirements
with respect to continued listing standards, which include, among other things, when it appears to the Board of Directors of the Exchange that “the extent of
public distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make further dealings on the Exchange inadvisable” (Rule 1002).
Rule 1003 also provides that the Exchange will not normally consider removing shares from listing where, like Enservco at the present time, “the issuer has at
least 1,100,000 shares publicly held, a market value of publicly held shares of at least $15,000,000 and 400 round lot shareholders”.

We believe we are in compliance with NYSE American listing requirements, but there can be no assurance that we will continue to meet
those listing requirements in the future. If we fail to meet the requirements, our common stock may be delisted. If our common stock is delisted, we would be
forced to list our common stock on the OTC Markets or some other quotation medium, depending on our ability to meet the specific requirements of those
quotation systems. In that case, we may lose some or all of our institutional investors, and selling our common stock on the OTC Markets would be more difficult
because smaller quantities of shares would likely be bought and sold and transactions could be delayed. These factors could result in lower prices and larger
spreads in the bid and ask prices for shares of our common stock. Further, because of the additional regulatory burdens imposed upon broker-dealers with
respect to de-listed companies, delisting could discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our stock, further limiting the liquidity of our shares.
These factors could have a material adverse effect on the trading price, liquidity, value and marketability of our stock.

General Corporate Risks

Concentration of ownership makes it unlikely that any stockholder will be able to influence t he election of directors or engage in a change of

control transaction.

Five stockholders directly and indirectly own approximately 47% of the Company ’s outstanding common stock and have the ability to heavily influence
the election of our directors when they again stand for reelection. Furthermore, it is likely that no person seeking control of the Company through stock ownership
will be able to succeed in doing so without negotiating an arrangement to do so with these stockholders. For so long as these stockholders continue to own a
significant percentage of the outstanding shares of the Company common stock, they will retain such influence over the election of the board of directors and the
negotiation of any change of control transaction.

Provisions in our charter documents could prevent or delay a change in control or a takeover.

Provisions in our bylaws provide certain requirements for the nomination of directors which preclude a stockholder from nominating a candidate to stand
for election at any annual meeting. As described in Section 2.12 of the Company’s bylaws, nominations must be presented to the Company well in advance of a
scheduled annual meeting, and the notification must include specific information as set forth in that section. The Company believes that such a provision
provides reasonable notice of the nominees to the board of directors, but it may preclude stockholder nomination at a meeting where the stockholder is not
familiar with nomination procedures and, therefore, may prevent or delay a change of control or takeover.

Although the Delaware General Corporation Law includes § 112 which provides that bylaws of Delaware corporations may require the corporation to
include in its proxy materials one or more nominees submitted by stockholders in addition to individuals nominated by the board of directors, the bylaws of the
Company do not so provide. As a result, if any stockholder desires to nominate persons for election to the board of directors, the proponent will have to incur all
of the costs normally associated with a proxy contest.

Indemnification of officers and directors may result in unanticipated expenses.

The Delaware General Corporation Law, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws, and i ndemnification agreements between
the Company and certain individuals provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain circumstances, against
attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with us or activities on our
behalf. We also will bear the expenses of such litigation for any of our directors, officers, employees, or agents, upon such person’s promise to repay them if it is
ultimately determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by
us that we may be unable to recoup and could direct funds away from our business and products (if any).

We have significant obligations under the 1934 Act and the NYSE American.

Because we are a public company filing reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are subject to increased regulatory scrutiny and
extensive and complex regulation. The Securities and Exchange Commission has the right to review the accuracy and completeness of our reports, press
releases, and other public documents. In addition, we are subject to extensive requirements to institute and maintain financial accounting controls and for the
accuracy and completeness of our books and records. In addition to regulation by the SEC, we are subject to the NYSE American rules. The NYSE
American rules contain requirements with respect to corporate governance, communications with shareholders, and various other matters.

Our operations are subject to cyber-attacks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations and

consolidated financial condition.

Our operations are increasingly dependent on digital technologies and services. We use these technologies for internal purposes, including data storage,
processing and transmissions, as well as in our interactions with customers and suppliers. Digital technologies are subject to the risk of cyber-attacks. If our
systems for protecting against cybersecurity risks prove not to be sufficient, we could be adversely affected by, among other things: loss of or damage to
intellectual property, proprietary or confidential information, or customer, supplier, or employee data; interruption of our business operations; and increased costs
required to prevent, respond to, or mitigate cybersecurity attacks. These risks could harm our reputation and our relationships with customers, suppliers,
employees and other third parties, and may result in claims against us. These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of
operations and consolidated financial condition.

Forward-looking statements may prove to be inaccurate.

In our effort to make the information in this report more meaningful, this report contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All statements
other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements within the meanings of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
1934 Act. Forward-looking statements in this report are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect the current expectations of our management concerning
future results and events. We have attempted to qualify our forward-looking statements with appropriate cautionary language to take advantage of the judicially-
created doctrine of “bespeaks caution” and other protections.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance and
achievements to be different from any future results, performance and achievements expressed or implied by these statements. These factors are not
necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements in this annual
report. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on our future results.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth real property owned and lease d by the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017. Unless otherwise indicated,

the properties are used in Heat Waves’ operations.

Owned Properties:
Location/Description
Killdeer, ND(1)
• Shop
• Land – shop
• Housing
• Land – housing

Tioga, ND(2)
• Shop
• Land
Garden City, KS
• Shop
• Land – shop
• Land – acid dock, truck storage, etc.

Hugoton, KS (Dillco)

• Shop/Office/Storage
• Land – shop/office/storage
• Office
• Land – office

(1) Property is collateral for mortgage debt obligation.
(2) Location not currently in operations.

Approximate Size

10,000 sq. ft.
8 acres
5,000 sq. ft.
2 acres

4,000 sq. ft.
6 acres

11,700 sq. ft.
1 acre
10 acres

9,367 sq. ft.
3.3 acres
1,728 sq. ft.
10 acres

Leased Properties:

Location/Description
Platteville, CO
• Shop
• Land

La Salle, CO

• Shop
• Land
Fort Lupton, CO
• Land

Rock Springs, WY

• Shop
• Land
Carmichaels, PA
• Shop
• Land
Jourdanton, TX
• Shop
• Land

Bryan, TX

• Shop
• Land
Okarche, OK

• Shop
• Land
Denver, CO (3)

• Corporate offices

Approximate Size

Monthly Rental

Lease Expiration

3,200 sq. ft.
1.5 acres

6,000 sq. ft.
3.0 acres

7.0 acres

10,200 sq. ft.
3 acres

5,000 sq. ft.
12.1 acres

5,850 sq. ft.
2.3 acres

6,000 sq. ft.
1.6 acres

5,000 sq. ft.
2 acres

7,352 sq. ft.

$3,000

Month-to-month

$8,000

January 2021

$4,500

June 2018

$6,500

Month-to-month

$7,500

April 2022

$8,150

June 2020

$5,345

August 2022

$6,000

October 2020

$16,848

June 2022

(3) Company is receiving $2,850 monthly under a short-term sublease agreement for a portion of this leased property.

Note - All leases have renewal clauses

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Enservco Corporation ("Enservco") and its subsidiary Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC (“Heat Waves”) are defendants in a civil lawsuit in federal court in
Colorado, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00983-RBJ (“Colorado Case”), that alleges that Enservco and Heat Waves, in offering and selling frac water heating services,
infringed and induced others to infringe two patents owned by Heat-On-The-Fly, LLC (“HOTF”). The complaint relates to only a portion of the frac water heating
services provided by Heat Waves. The Colorado Case is now stayed pending resolution of an appeal by HOTF of a North Dakota court’s ruling that the primary
patent (“the ‘993 Patent”) in the Colorado Case was invalid. Neither Enservco nor Heat Waves is a party to the North Dakota Case, which involves other energy
companies.

The ‘993 Patent has undergone several reexaminations by the USPTO and in February 2015, the USPTO rejected all 99 claims of the ‘993 Patent in the
latest reexamination. However, in May 2016, the USPTO reversed its decision and confirmed all 99 claims as being patentable over the cited prior art in the
reexamination proceeding. Further, in September 2016 and February 2017, HOTF was issued two additional patents, both of which could be asserted against
Enservco and/or Heat Waves. Management believes that final findings of invalidity and/or unenforceability of the ‘993 Patent based on inequitable conduct could
serve as a basis to affect the validity and/or enforceability of each of HOTF’s patents. If these Patents are ultimately held to be invalid and/or enforceable, the
Colorado Case would become moot.

As noted above, the Colorado Case has been stayed. However, in the event that HOTF ’s appeal is successful and the ‘993 Patent is found to be valid
and/or enforceable in the North Dakota Case, the Colorado Case may resume. To the extent that Enservco and Heat Waves are unsuccessful in their defense of
the Colorado Case, they could be liable for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees (both of which may be significant) and Heat Waves could possibly be
enjoined from using any technology that is determined to be infringing. Either result could negatively impact Heat Waves’ business and operations. At this time,
the Company is unable to predict the outcome of this case, and accordingly has not recorded an accrual for any potential loss.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE American under the symbol “ ENSV”. The table below sets forth the high and low daily closing sales prices of
the Company’s Common Stock during the periods indicated as reported by the New York Stock Exchange for each of the quarters in the years ended December
31, 2017 and 2016, respectively:

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

2017
Price Range

2016
Price Range

High

Low

High

Low

0.62 $
0.47
0.61
0.77

0.26 $
0.21
0.28
0.43

0.70 $
0.83
0.72
0.74

0.35
0.53
0.53
0.41

The closing sales price of the Company ’s common stock as reported on March 15, 2018, was $0. 95 per share.

Holders

As of March 15, 2018, there were approximately 450 holders of record of Company common stock. This does not include an indeterminate number of

persons who hold our Common Stock in brokerage accounts and otherwise in “street name”.

Dividends

Holders of common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company did not declare

or pay dividends during its fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016, and has no plans at present to declare or pay any dividends.

Decisions concerning dividend payments in the future will depend on income and cash requirements. However, in its agreements with East West Bank,
our principal lender, the Company represented that it would not pay any cash dividends on its common stock until its obligations to East West Bank are satisfied.
Furthermore, to the extent the Company has any earnings, it will likely retain earnings to pay down debt, or expand corporate operations and not use such
earnings to pay dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following is provided with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities are

authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2017:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category
and Description

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,

Warrants, and Rights
(a)

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants, and Rights
(b)

Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance

Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(a))
(c)

4,814,433(1) $

1,642,902(2)

6,457,335

0.71

0.32

0.61

7,045,111(3)

7,045,111

Total

(1)

(2)

Represents (i) 3,346,600 unexercised options outstanding under the Company ’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, and (ii) 1,467,833 unexercised
options under the Company’s frozen 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (see below for further information).

Consists of: (i) warrants issued in June 2016 to the principals of the Company’s existing investor relations firm to acquire 30,000 shares of
Company common stock exercisable at $0.70 per share and (ii) warrants issued in June 2017 in connection with a subordinated debt
agreement with Cross River Partners, L.P., our largest stockholder.

(3)

Calculated as 10,391,711 shares of common stock reserved for the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan less 3,346,600 options outstanding under the
2016 Plan. No additional stock option grants will be granted under the 2010 Plan as summarized below.

Description of the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan:

On July 27, 2010, the Company ’s Board of Directors adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan permitted the granting of
equity-based awards to our directors, officers, employees, consultants, independent contractors and affiliates. The 2010 Plan was approved by the Company’s
stockholders in October 2010 and permitted the issuance of options that qualify as Incentive Stock Options pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

As discussed below, the 2010 Plan has been replaced by a new stock option plan and no additional stock o ption grants will be granted under the 2010
Plan. However, as of December 31, 2017, there were options to purchase 1,467,833 shares which remain outstanding under the 2010 Plan that were awarded
prior to the adoption of the 2016 Plan described below.

Description of the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan:

On July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the adoption of the Enservco Corporation 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “ 2016 Plan”),
which was approved by the stockholders on September 29, 2016. The 2016 Plan is administered by our Board of Directors, which may in turn delegate authority
to administer the 2016 Plan to a committee. Our plan administrator may make grants of cash and equity awards under the 2016 Plan to facilitate compliance with
Section 162(m) of the Code. Subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan, the plan administrator may determine the recipients, numbers and types of awards to be
granted, and the terms and conditions of the awards, including the period of their exercisability and vesting. On November 29, 2017, the Board of Directors
established a compensation committee that will administer the 2016 Plan.

The aggregate number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan will not exceed 10,391,711 shares over the next ten

years (the stated life of the 2016 plan). As of December 31, 2017, there were options to purchase 3,346,600 shares outstanding under the 2016 Plan.

The 2016 Plan permits the granting of:

•
•
•
•
•
•

Stock options (including both incentive and non-qualified stock options);
Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”);
Restricted stock and restricted stock units;
Performance awards of cash, stock, other securities or property;
Other stock grants; and
Other stock-based awards.

Unless sooner discontinued or terminated by the Board, the 2016 Plan will expire on September 29, 2026. No awards may be made after that date.
However, unless otherwise expressly provided in an applicable award agreement, any award granted under the 2016 Plan prior to expiration extends beyond
the expiration of the 2016 Plan through the award’s normal expiration date.

Without the approval of the Company ’s stockholders, the Committee will not re-price, adjust or amend the exercise price of any options or the grant
price of any SAR previously awarded, whether through amendment, cancellation and replacement grant or any other means, except in connection with a stock
dividend or other distribution, including a stock split, merger or other similar corporate transaction or event, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the
benefits, or potential benefits intended to be provided under the 2016 Plan.

Other Stock Compensation Arrangements:

In November 2012, the Company granted each of the principals of its existing investor relations firm a warrant to purchase 112,500 shares of the
Company’s common stock (a total of 225,000 shares) for the firm’s part in creating awareness for the Company’s private equity placement, in November 2012,
as discussed herein. The warrants were exercisable at $0.55 per share for a five-year term. Each of the warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis. The
warrants also provide that subject to various conditions, the holders have piggy-back registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock that may be
acquired upon the exercise of the warrants. None of these warrants remain outstanding at December 31, 2017.

In June 2017, in connection with a subordinated loan agreement , the Company granted Cross River Partners, L.P. two five-year warrants to buy an
aggregate total of 1,612,902 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.31 per share, the average closing price of the Company’s
common stock for the 20-day period ended May 11, 2017. The warrants had a grant-date fair value of $0.19 per share and vested in full on June 28, 2017.
These warrants are accounted for as a liability in the balance sheet included in our financial statements included in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As of December 31, 2017, all of these warrants remain outstanding.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On November 30, 2017, a principal of the Company ’s investor relations firm exercised common stock warrants to purchase 112,500 shares of Common
Stock, $0.005 par value, of the Company. The warrants were granted pursuant to an investor relations services agreement between the Company and that firm
as partial compensation for that firm’s part in creating awareness for the Company’s private equity placement in November 2012. The warrants were exercisable
at $0.55 per share for a five-year term ending on November 30, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the warrant agreement, the warrants were exercised on a
cashless basis and resulted in the issuance of 26,729 shares of common stock to the holder, and no cash proceeds to the Company. There were no
underwriters involved in any of the exercise transactions, and the Company paid no commissions or other remuneration as a result of the exercise of the
warrants. The holder of the warrant to whom the shares were issued is an existing security holder of the Company and represented to the Company that he is
an accredited investor; therefore, the shares were issued in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided in Section 3(a)(9), and Sections 4(a)(2) and
(5) of the Securities Act, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder. The transaction was made without any form of advertising or general solicitation,
and the holder of the warrant represented to the Company that he intended to acquire the shares for investment purposes only and without a view toward further
distribution.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this Item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion provides information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and our financial

condition, liquidity and capital resources as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contain further detailed information, as well as the Risk Factors and the Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements included above.

OVERVIEW

The Company, through its subsidiaries, provides the following oil field services to the domest ic onshore oil and natural gas industry – (i) frac water
heating, hot oiling, pressure testing, and acidizing (well enhancement services); (ii) water transfer and bacteria and scale treatment services (water transfer
services); (iii) freshwater and saltwater hauling, fluid disposal, frac tank rental (water hauling services); and, (iv) well site construction and other general oil field
services (construction services). The Company owns and operates through its subsidiaries a fleet of more than 630 specialized trucks, trailers, frac tanks and
other well-site related equipment and serves customers in several major domestic oil and gas areas including the DJ Basin/Niobrara area in Colorado, the
Bakken area in North Dakota, the San Juan Basin in northwestern New Mexico, the Marcellus and Utica Shale areas in Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Jonah area,
Green River and Powder River Basins in Wyoming, the Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk in Texas and the Mississippi Lime and Hugoton areas in Kansas and
Oklahoma.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary

Several positive developments occurred in 2017. Overall demand for our services increased due to improved industry conditions and cooler
temperatures in several of our heating markets compared to 2016. In addition, we added three major customers that expanded our frac water heating business
that helped to offset warm weather in the Marcellus/Utica shale market during the winter of 2016-2017. Also, we continued to grow and expand our water
transfer business. We acquired these assets in January 2016 and due to the low crude oil prices in 2016, we were not able to generate any water transfer
business until late in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Revenues for 2017 increased $16.1 million, or 66%, over 2016, due to a 94 % increase in our core well enhancement revenue. Higher frac water heating
revenues in our Rocky Mountain region, improved demand for hot oil services in the Bakken, and continued expansion of hot oiling and acidizing services in the
Eagle Ford all contributed to the increase in well enhancement revenues. Water transfer revenues were approximately $1.9 million higher than last year due to
continued expansion of services.

Segment profits (losses) for 2017 improved by approximately $7.4 million, to profit of approximately $7.1 million from a loss of
approximately $213,000 in 2016 due to improved results from our well enhancement services and the results from our water transfer segment. General &
administrative expenses, excluding severance and transition costs, increased by approximately $ 679,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared
to 2016, due primarily to an increase in personnel costs at the corporate level. Severance and transition costs related to the resignation of the Company’s former
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of approximately $784,000 were incurred during 2017. Interest expense for 2017
increased approximately $495,000 from 2016 primarily due to $ 327,000 of accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs related to reduction in term and
extinguishment of the credit facility provided by PNC, and due to an increase in borrowing costs due to the higher weighted-average interest rate paid on
borrowings with PNC and other lenders, partially offset by savings related to the lower interest rate on our new credit facility provided by East West Bank, which
we closed on August 10, 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized a net loss of approximately $6.9 million or ($0.13) per share compared to a net loss

of $8.6 million or ($0.22) per share last year primarily due to the aforementioned increase in higher margin well enhancement revenues.

Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $ 3.4 million compared to a negative EBITDA of approximately $3.3

million in 2016.

Industry Overview

During 2017, improved commodity prices and an increase in active rigs in North America resulted in an increase in production and completion activities
by our customers, which led to an increase in demand for our services. While demand and pricing for the services we provide remain below levels we
experienced before the industry downturn that began in the last half of 2014, we believe current activity levels will support continued modest improvement in
both metrics. The Company has reacted to increases in demand by allocating resources to our most active customers and basins, as we focus on increasing
utilization levels and optimizing the deployment of our equipment and workforce, and maintaining a high service quality and safety record. The recent market
recovery has also allowed us to compete on the basis of the quality and breadth of our service offerings, as our customers focus on optimization in production.

Crude prices and the North American rig count have increased since the low points in February 2016 and May 2016, respectively. The United States rig
count bottomed out at approximately 400 in the spring of 2016 and increased to approximately 930 as of December 31, 2017, which translated into increased
activity for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 2016.

Segment Overview

Enservco’s reportable business segments are Well Enhancement Services, Water Transfer Services, Water Hauling Services, and Construction
Services. These segments have been selected based on changes in management’s resource allocation and performance assessment in making decisions
regarding the Company.

The following is a description of the segments:

Well Enhancement Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of frac water heating units, hot oil trucks and acidizing units to provide well enhancement and
completion services to the domestic oil and gas industry. These services include frac water heating, hot oil services, pressure testing, and acidizing
services.

Water Transfer Services: This segment utilizes high and low volume pumps, lay flat hose, aluminum pipe and manifolds and related equipment to move
fresh and/or recycled water from a water source such as a pond, lake, river, stream, or water storage facility to frac tanks at drilling locations to be used
in connection with well completion activities. Also included in this segment are water treatment services whereby to remove bacteria and scale from
water, the Company used patented hydropath technology under an agreement with HydroFLOW USA.

Water Hauling Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of trucks and related assets, including specialized tank trucks, vacuum trailers, storage tanks, and
disposal facilities to provide various water hauling services. These services are primarily provided by Dillco in the Hugoton area in Kansas and
Oklahoma.

Construction Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of trucks and equipment to provide supplementary construction and roustabout services to the oil
and gas and construction industry. In 2016, the Company used this fleet of equipment to provide dirt hauling services to a general construction
contractor in Colorado but due to low margins in this segment did not generate meaningful revenue in 2017.

Segment Results:

The following tables set forth revenue from operations and segment profits for the Company ’s business segments for the fiscal years ended December

31, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):

REVENUES:

Well Enhancement Services
Water Transfer Services
Water Hauling Services
Construction Services
Unallocated & Other

Total Revenues

SEGMENT PROFIT (LOSS):

Well Enhancement Services
Water Transfer Services
Water Hauling Services
Construction Services
Unallocated & Other

Total Segment Profit (loss)

Well Enhancement Services:

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2017

2016

34,686 $
2,128
3,684
254
-

40,752 $

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2017

2016

8,784 $
(538)
(295)
42
(845)

7,148 $

17,864
184
3,838
2,713
9

24,608

2,210
(1,445)
41
(279)
(740)

(213)

For 2017, well enhancement service revenue increased $16.8 million, or 94%, to $34.7 million. The increased demand for services is due to improved
industry conditions, the addition of three major customers in our frac water heating business, more normal winter temperatures, and an extended heating
season in our heating markets all contributed to the increase in revenues over last year.

Frac water heating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased 175% to $18.4 million compared to $6.7 million in 2016. Improved
industry conditions including higher commodity prices and increased drilling rig activity increased demand for our services over 2016. Particularly strong gains
are occurring from Marcellus Shale and Utica Shale locations in Pennsylvania as general industry activity has increased in the region due to increased
demand. Further, the addition of three additional customers in the Rocky Mountain region also contributed to a substantial increase in frac water heating in this
area.

Hot oil revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased 29% to $11.1 million compared to $8.6 million in 2016. Incremental hot oil service
revenues from our geographic expansion into the Eagle Ford combined with increased revenues in the DJ Basin and North Dakota due to improved commodity
prices were the primary drivers of the increase over last year.

Acidizing revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased 64% to $3.6 million compared to $2.2 million in 2016. The Company ’s continued
efforts to aggressively pursue customers and partner with chemical suppliers to develop new cost-effective acid programs have allowed us to expand our
acidizing services into the Eagle Ford Shale formation in Texas.

Segment profits for our core well enhancement services increased $6.6 million or 297% in 2017 compared to 2016. Increased revenues from the
aforementioned more normal winter temperatures, the extension of heating season into the second quarter, the rebound of oil prices, and addition of new
customers contributed to the improved segment profits. In the near future, the Company plans to continue to re-deploy equipment to more active basins to
increase utilization and improve this segment’s profits.

Water Transfer Services:

In January 2016, the Company acquired approximately $4.3 million of water transfer and water treatment assets, with the intent of launching a new water
transfer service line. Water transfer services involve the use of water pumps, lay flat hose, and aluminum pipe to transport water from a water source to a frac
site. This service is complementary to our frac water heating service in that the frac water we heat is provided by water transfer and allows bundling of these
services with our frac water heating services.

Also, in connection with the acquisition above, the Company acquired a new water treatment technology utilized in devices sold under the name of
HydroFLOW but discontinued the contract with HydroFLOW as of January 1, 2018 due to lack of meaningful sales. HydroFLOW products offer water treatment
services based on patented hydropath technology that can remove bacteria and scale from water using electrical induction to reduce or eliminate down-hole
scaling and corrosion. We continue to evaluate potential use cases for the technology for customers within and outside of the oil and natural gas industry.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Water Transfer Services accounted for 5% of total revenue, and increased by $ 1.9 million, to $2.1 million, due
to the incremental revenues from three new customers during 2017. We consider the water transfer services segment to be an opportunity to grow our business
with both new and existing customers and believe it offers opportunity to reduce the level of seasonality we have historically experienced. Segment results for the
water transfer segment in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include approximately $283,000 and $325,000 of marketing and trial costs related to
the HydroFLOW water treatment services, respectively.

Water Transfer segment losses for the year ended December 31, 2017, were approximately $538,000, compared to losses of $1.4 million in the year
ended December 31, 2016. The Company continued to market and conduct proof of concept studies for the new water treatment technology utilized in devices
sold under the name of HydroFLOW. As of January 1, 2018, the Company terminated its agreement with HydroFLOW. During the year ended December 31,
2017, the Company recognized revenues of approximately $22,000 related to HydroFLOW products.

Water Hauling Services

Water hauling service revenues, which represent approximately 9% of our 2017 consolidated revenues, declined approximately $ 154,000, or 4%, in
2017 compared to last year. The decline was primarily attributable to lower water hauling revenues in our Central USA region due to scaled back service work,
pricing concessions, the cessation of certain low margin accounts, and reduced service activity in our Central USA region due to heavy rains during February.

Water hauling revenues have continued to decline over the last four years as this segment of the oil and gas industry has become highly compe titive,
which has resulted in downward pressure on prices. As noted above, the Company has reduced prices to remain competitive but also elected to eliminate
certain low margin work.

The Company recorded a segment loss of approximately $295,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to profit of approximately

$41,000 in 2016.

Construction Services:

In May 2016, the Company began to provide dirt excavation and hauling services to general contractors in the construction industry to offset some of the
seasonal decline in revenues from our frac heating business and to utilize and retain key frac heating operators over the summer months. The Company used
some of its existing construction equipment in both Heat Waves and Dillco to launch this service.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized approximately $254,000 in construction services revenue compared to approximately
$2.7 million during 2016, of which $2.5 million related to a specific dirt hauling project in Colorado. Due to the size and deadlines associated with this project, the
Company supplemented its existing resources with sub-contractors. Logistical challenges and equipment issues related to the Colorado project, resulted in a
segment loss of $279,000 during 2016. The Company has utilized the construction segment to retain employees during slow periods.

Unallocated and Other:

Unallocated and other costs include costs which are not specifically allocated to the business segments above including labor, travel, and operating

costs for regional managers.

During 2017, unallocated costs increased 14% to $845,000 compared to $740,000 in 2016.

Geographic Areas:

The Company only does business in the United States, in what it believes are three geographically diverse regions. The following table sets forth revenue from
operations for the Company’s three geographic regions during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):

BY GEOGRAPHY:

Rocky Mountain Region (1)
Central USA Region (2)
Eastern USA Region (3)
Total Revenues

Notes to tables:

For the Year Ended
December 30,

2017

2016

25,642 $
13,297
1,813
40,752 $

13,674
9,631
1,303
24,608

(1)

(2)

Includes the D-J Basin/Niobrara field (northeastern Colorado and southeastern Wyoming), the Powder River and Green River Basins (northeastern and
southwestern Wyoming), the Bakken area (western North Dakota and eastern Montana). Heat Waves and HWWM operate in this region.
Includes the Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk (southern Texas) and Mississippi Lime and Hugoton Field (southwes tern Kansas, north central
Oklahoma, and the Texas panhandle). Heat Waves, Dillco, and HWWM operate in this region.

(3) Consists of the southern region of the Marcellus Shale formation (southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Vi rginia) and the Utica Shale formation

(eastern Ohio). Heat Waves is the only Company subsidiary operating in this region.

Revenues in the Rocky Mountain Region increased $12.0 million or 88% for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the prior year due
to several factors including (i) increased frac water heating activity in the DJ Basin/Niobrara Shale, Bakken area, and Wyoming basins due to more normal winter
temperatures and incremental revenues generated from three new customers, (ii) the ramp up of our water transfer business during 2017, and (iii) increased hot
oiling service activity in the Bakken area and DJ Basin.

Revenues in the Central USA region increased $3.7 million or 38% for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $9.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016, primarily due to incremental revenues from our geographic expansion into the Eagle Ford Shale. This increase was offset by a decline in
water hauling activity in the Hugoton field area. Scaled back service work due to heavy rains in February, 2017, price concessions and elimination of certain low
margin water hauling customers were the primary reasons for a decline in water hauling business in the Hugoton field area.

Revenues in the Eastern USA region increased approximately $510,000 to $1.8 million or 39% for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared
to $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to increased frac water heating and hot oil service activity in the Marcellus and Utica shale
basin. Unseasonably warm weather significantly reduced demand for heating services in this basin and essentially eliminated most of our frac water heating
revenue in the year ended December 31, 2016. However, industry conditions improved in 2017 as production increased commensurate to the increase in
infrastructure throughout the region to meet growing demand. During 2016 and certain periods of 2017, the Company redeployed certain frac heating equipment
to other regions to increase utilization rates.

Historical Seasonality of Revenues:

Because of the seasonality of our frac water heating and hot oiling busines s, revenues generated during the first and fourth quarters of our fiscal year,
covering the months during what we call our “heating season,” are significantly higher than revenues earned during the second and third quarters of the year. In
addition, the revenue mix of our service offerings also changes among quarters as our Well Enhancement Services (which includes frac water heating and hot
oiling) decrease as a percentage of total revenues and Water Hauling Services (water hauling) and other services increase. Thus, the revenues recognized in
our quarterly financials in any given period are not indicative of the annual or quarterly revenues through the remainder of that fiscal year.

As an indication of this quarter-to-quarter seasonality, the Company generated revenues of $ 28.0 million, or 69%, of its 2017 revenues during the first
and fourth quarters of 2017 compared to $12.8 million, or 31%, during the second and third quarters of 2017. In 2016, the Company generated revenues of
$15.0 million, or 61%, of its 2016 revenues during the first and fourth quarters of 2016 compared to $9.6 million, or 39%, during the second and third quarters of
2016. While the Company is pursuing various strategies to lessen these quarterly fluctuations by expanding and/or adding non-seasonal service lines, there can
be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so.

Direct Operating Expenses:

Direct operating expenses, which include labor costs, propane, fuel, chemicals, truck repairs and maintenance, supplies, insurance, and site overhead
costs for our operating segments increased by approximately $8.7 million or 36% during 2017 compared to last year, primarily due to the overall increase in
service activity in our well enhancement service segment as well as our new water transfer division.

General and Administrative Expenses:

General and administrative expenses increased approximately $679,000, or 18%, to $4.5 million in 2017 compared to $3.8 million in 2016 primarily due
to (i) payment and the accrual of 2017 annual bonuses to company personnel, (ii) an increase in stock compensation expense, including approximately
$100,000 in incremental expense due to the accelerated vesting of options granted to our former President and CEO, and (iii) consulting costs and contract labor
costs incurred during the executive transition period.

Patent Litigation and Defense Costs:

Patent litigation and defense costs for the year ended December 31, 2017 declined to $129,000 compar ed to $151,000 for 2016. As discussed in Item 3.
– Litigation, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado issued a decision on July 20, 2015 to stay the Company’s case with HOTF pending an appeal of a
2015 judgement by a North Dakota Court invalidating the ‘993 Patent. As a result of the stay, legal costs have been minimal since July 2015.

Enservco and Heat Waves deny that they are infringing any valid, enforceable claim of the asserted HOTF patents, and intend to continue to vigorously
defend themselves in the Colorado Case and challenge the validity and/or enforceability of these patents should the lawsuit resume. The Company expects
associated legal fees to be minimal going forward until the Colorado Case is resumed. In the event that HOTF’s appeal is successful and the ‘993 Patent is
found to be valid and/or enforceable in the North Dakota Case, the Colorado Case may resume.

Depreciation and Amortization:

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased approximately $377,000, or 5%, from 2016 primarily due to

certain assets of ours becoming fully depreciated in 2017.

Severance and Transition Costs:

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized costs of approximately $784,000, related to the departures of the former President
and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The costs incurred primarily comprise payments to the former executives pursuant to their respective
termination agreements and legal and professional costs directly related to the transition to the new management team. In addition, as described above, upon the
accelerated vesting of option grants made to our former President and CEO we incurred an incremental $100,000 in stock-based compensation expense.

Income (Loss) from operations:

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized a loss from operations of $4.7 million compared to a loss from operations of $11.0
million for 2016. The improvement of $6.3 million was primarily due to a $ 7.4 million increase in segment profits, partially offset by the increase in General and
Administrative Expenses and Severance and Transition Costs discussed above.

Interest Expense:

Interest expense increased approximately $495,000, or 28%, to $2.3 million in 2017 compared to $1.8 million in 2016, due primarily to approximately
$327,000 of accelerated amortization expense of debt issuance costs during 2017 related to reduction in term and extinguishment of our PNC credit facility. In
addition, higher amendment fees and increases in our effective interest rate due to amendments to our PNC credit facility also contributed to the increase. These
increases were partially offset by a $72,000 reduction in interest expense from 2016 related to the fair value adjustments related to our interest rate swap
agreement with PNC.

Income Taxes:

Income tax benefit was approximately $561,000 in 2017, compared to a tax benefit of $3.9 million in 2016. Our effective tax benefit rate was
approximately 24.3% in 2017 compared to an effective tax benefit rate of 37.0% in 2016. Our effective tax benefit in 2017 and 2016 approximates the federal
statutory rates enacted at the time of the reports.

Adjusted EBITDA*:

Management believes that, for the reasons set forth below, Adjusted EBITDA (even though a non-GAAP measure) is a valuable measurement of the

Company's liquidity and performance and is consistent with the measurements offered by other companies in the Company's industry.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA for years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):

EBITDA*
Net Loss
Add Back (Deduct)
Interest Expense
Provision for income taxes (benefit) expense
Depreciation and amortization

EBITDA*
Add Back (Deduct)

Stock-based compensation
Severance and transition costs
Patent litigation and defense expenses
Loss (Gain) on sale and disposal of equipment
Other expense (income)

Adjusted EBITDA

*Note: See discussion to follow below for use of non-GAAP financial measurements.

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2017

2016

(6,893) $

2,261
(561)
6,488
1,295

704
784
129
18
463
3,393 $

(8,551)

1,766
(3,938)
6,865
(3,858)

662
-
151
(242)
(44)
(3,331)

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Non-GAAP results are presented only as a supplement to the financial statements and for use within
management’s discussion and analysis based on U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The non-GAAP financial information is provided to
enhance the reader's understanding of the Company’s financial performance, but no non-GAAP measure should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of the most directly comparable GAAP measures to non-GAAP measures are provided
herein.

EBITDA is defined as net income (earnings), before interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA excludes
stock-based compensation from EBITDA and, when appropriate, other items that management does not utilize in assessing the Company’s ongoing operating
performance as set forth in the next paragraph. None of these non-GAAP financial measures are recognized terms under GAAP and do not purport to be an
alternative to net income as an indicator of operating performance or any other GAAP measure.

All of the items included in the reconciliation from net income to EBITDA and from EBITDA to Adjus ted EBITDA are either (i) non-cash items (e.g.,
depreciation, amortization of purchased intangibles, stock-based compensation, warrants issued, etc.) or (ii) items that management does not consider to be
useful in assessing the Company’s ongoing operating performance (e.g., income taxes, gain on sale of investments, loss on disposal of assets, patent litigation
and defense costs, severance and transition costs, other expense (income), etc.). In the case of the non-cash items, management believes that investors can
better assess the company’s operating performance if the measures are presented without such items because, unlike cash expenses, these adjustments do not
affect the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow or invest in its business.

We use, and we believe investors benefit from the presentation o f, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating our operating performance because it
provides us and our investors with an additional tool to compare our operating performance on a consistent basis by removing the impact of certain items that
management believes do not directly reflect our core operations. We believe that EBITDA is useful to investors and other external users of our financial
statements in evaluating our operating performance because EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard
to items such as interest expense, taxes, and depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting
methods and book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired. Additionally, our fixed charge coverage ratio
covenant associated with our Loan and Security Agreement with East West Bank require the use of Adjusted EBITDA in specific calculations.

Because not all companies use identical calculations, the Company’s presentation of non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to other
similarly titled measures of other companies. However, these measures can still be useful in evaluating the Company’s performance against its peer companies
because management believes the measures provide users with valuable insight into key components of GAAP financial disclosures.

Changes in Adjusted EBITDA*

Adjusted EBITDA from operations improved $6.7 million to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to an adjusted EBITDA of

negative $3.3 million for 2016, primarily due to the $ 7.4 million improvement in segment profit discussed above.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table summarizes our statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and (combined with the working capital

table and discussion below) is important for understanding our liquidity (amounts in thousands):

Net cash used in operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period

Years Ended December 31,
2016
2017

(3,989) $
(1,304)
5,063
(230)

621

391 $

(1,997)
(4,746)
6,559
(184)

805

621

The following table sets forth a summary of certain aspects of our balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):

Current Assets
Total Assets
Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Working Capital (Current Assets net of Current Liabilities)
Stockholders’ equity

Overview:

Years Ended December 31,
2016
2017

13,653 $
44,250
5,647
36,025
8,006
8,225

7,037
42,370
4,001
27,955
3,036
14,415

We have relied on cash flow from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit agreements, and equity offerings to satisfy our liquidity needs. Our
ability to fund operating cash flow shortfalls, fund capital expenditures, and make acquisitions will depend upon our future operating performance and on the
availability of equity and debt financing. At December 31, 2017, we had approximately $391,000 of cash and cash equivalents and approximately $ 2.1 million
available under our asset based senior revolving credit facility. Our capital requirements over the next 12 months are anticipated to include, but are not limited
to, operating expenses, debt servicing, and capital expenditures including maintenance of our existing fleet of assets.

As described in more detail Note 5 to our financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements” of this report, on August 10, 2017, we entered
into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “2017 Credit Agreement”) with East West Bank (“East West Bank”) which provides for a three-year $30 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”), that replaced the five-year $30 million senior secured revolving credit Facility (the “Prior Credit
Facility”) provided under the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “2014 Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank, National
Association (“PNC”).

The 2017 Credit Agreement allows us to borrow up to 85% of our eligible receivables and up to 85% of the appraised value of our eligible equipment.
We used initial proceeds of approximately $21.8 million to repay all amounts due pursuant to our Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security
Agreement (the "2014 Credit Agreement") with PNC Bank, National Association ("PNC"), and pay other closing costs and fees. Upon entering into the 2017
Credit Agreement, we had approximately $4.6 million available under the terms of the agreement.

On March 31, 2017, our largest shareholder, Cross River Partners, L.P., posted a letter of credit in the amount of $1.5 million in accordance with the
terms of the Tenth Amendment to the 2014 Credit Agreement. The letter of credit was converted into subordinated debt with a maturity date of June 28, 2022
with a stated interest rate of 10% per annum and a five-year warrant to purchase 967,741 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.31 per share.
On May 10, 2017, Cross River Partners, L.P. also provided $1.0 million in subordinated debt to us as required under the terms of our Tenth Amendment to the
2014 Credit Agreement. This subordinated debt has a stated annual interest rate of 10% and maturity date of June 28, 2022. In connection with this issuance of
subordinated debt, Cross River Partners L.P. was granted a five-year warrant to purchase 645,161 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.31 per
share.

As of December 31, 2017, we had an outstanding principal loan balance under the 2017 Credit Agreement of approximately $27.1 million. The interest
rate on borrowings under the 2017 Credit Agreement at December 31, 2017 was 5.06% per year for the $24.5 million of outstanding LIBOR Rate borrowings and
6.25% per year for the $ 2.6 million of outstanding Prime Rate borrowings, for a weighted average interest rate of 5.16%.

The 2017 Credit Agreement has certain customary financial covenants and consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017, as described below:

a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined, not less than 1.10 to 1.00, measured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter based on
trailing twelve-month information);

In periods when the trailing twelve-month FCCR is less than 1.20 to 1.00, we are required to maintain minimum liquidity of $1,500,000 (including
excess availability under the 2017 Credit Agreement and balance sheet cash).

(i)

(ii)

Liquidity:

As of December 31, 2017, our available liquidity was $2.4 million, which was substantially comprised of $ 2.1 million of availability on the credit
facility (subject to a covenant requirement that we maintain $1.5 million of available liquidity) and $391,000 in cash. We utilize the 2017 Credit Facility to fund
working capital requirements, and during the year ended December 31, 2017, we received net cash proceeds from our various lines of credit of approximately
$4.3 million, and additionally received $ 1.1 million in non-cash proceeds to fund interest due on the notes.

On August 10, 2017, an initial advance of $21.8 million was made under the New Credit Facility to repay in full all obligations outstanding under the Prior
Credit Facility and fees and expenses incurred in connection with the termination of the 2014 Credit Agreement and the origination of the 2017 Credit
Agreement. Upon entering the 2017 Credit Agreement and repaying all amounts due pursuant to the 2014 Credit Agreement, we had availability of
approximately $4.6 million under the New Credit Facility.

The Company has incurred substantial losses for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and negative cash from o perations in 2017 and 2016 of
approximately $4.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively. While we expect that recent positive industry trends and our focus on increasing the utilization of our
assets will allow us to improve our GAAP operating income and cash flows from operations, there is no assurance that we will not continue to incur losses from
operations.

Working Capital:

As of December 31, 2017, we had positive working capital of approximately $8.0 million compared to positive working capital of $3.0 million as of
December 31, 2016. The increase in working capital was primarily attributable to our increased receivables due to increased revenues in the fourth quarter of
2017 compared to the prior year.

Deferred Tax Asset, net:

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had recorded a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax assets to zero.

Cash flow from Operating Activities:

Cash flow used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased approximately $2.0 million to cash used in operating activities of
$4.0 million compared to cash used in operating activities of $2.0 million during 2016, primarily due to (i) the decrease in cash flows provided by the monetization
of accounts receivable during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016, (ii) our payment of approximately $612,000 to the provider of our
workers' compensation insurance policy in the year ended December 31, 2017, and (iii) severance and transition costs paid during the year ended December
31, 2017.

Cash flow from Investing Activities:

Cash flow used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1.3 million compared to $4.7 million during 2016. During 2017, the
cash used primarily comprised capital expenditures for maintenance of our existing fleet of assets and for assets acquired pursuant to our agreement with
HydroFLOW. During 2016, the Company purchased $4.3 million of water transfer assets from WET and HIIT.

Cash flow from Financing Activities:

Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 was $ 5.1 million compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$6.5 million for the year ended 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we borrowed a net $4.3 million (excluding non-cash advances for interest
payments) under our revolving credit facilities and issued subordinated debt of $1.0 million (excluding non-cash proceeds), to fund working capital requirements
and invest in our fleet of assets.

Outlook:

We believe that the current oil and gas environment provides us an opportunity to increase our cash flows through the increased utilization of our asset
base, due to industry dynamics and our focus on deploying our assets into areas where our services are in high demand. We have seen an increase in such
demand due to the increase and stability in oil and natural gas commodity prices from 2016 lows, and increases in the level of production and development
activities across the industry. Our financial results in 2017 reflect our successful operational execution in response to this increased demand, and we are
optimistic about the prospects for 2018. Our long-term goals include driving increased utilization of our assets, the optimized deployment of our fleet, and the
right-sizing of our balance sheet by paying down debt. We continue to seek opportunities to expand our business operations through organic growth, including
increasing the volume and scope of current services offered to our new and existing customers. We may identify additional services to offer to our customer
base, and make related investments as capital and market conditions permits. We will continue to explore adding high margin services that , diversify and expand
our customer relationships while maintaining an appropriate balance between recurring maintenance work and drilling and completion related services.

Capital Commitments and Obligations:

The Company’s capital obligations as of December 31, 2017 consists primarily of scheduled principal payments under certain term loans and operating
We do not have any scheduled principal
leases. We repaid all amounts due under the 2014 Credit Agreement using proceeds from the 2017 Credit Agreement.
payments under the 2017 Credit Agreement until August 10, 2020, however, the Company may need to make future principal payments based upon collateral
availability. General terms and conditions for amounts due under these commitments and obligations are summarized in the notes to the financial statements.

Pursuant to a Sales Agreement with HydroFLOW USA, HWWM had the exclusive right to sell or rent patented hydropath devices in connection with
bacteria deactivation and scale treatment services for treating injection and disposal wells, fracking water and recycled water in the oil and gas industry to
HWWM customers in the United States. Pursuant to the sales agreement, HWWM was required to pay 3.5% royalties of its gross revenues on certain rental
transactions and, in order to maintain the exclusivity provision under the agreement, we were required purchase approximately $655,000 of equipment per year
commencing in 2016 and ending 2025. In November 2016, we and HydroFLOW USA agreed to allocate $220,000 of the 2016 commitment to 2017, thereby
increasing the minimum purchase requirement for 2017 to $875,000. During 2017, we purchased $280,000 of equipment to meet our 2016 purchase
commitment for exclusivity. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we did not accrue or pay any royalties to HydroFLOW. We have negotiated a
release of all 2016 and 2017 purchase commitments, and, as of January 8, 2018, terminated our agreement with HydroFLOW.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company has no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our
stockholders.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles req uires management to make a variety of
estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements, and (ii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods covered by the financial statements.

Our management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and
assumptions affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increase, these judgments become even more subjective and complex. Although we believe that
our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates and assumptions based upon
actual results may have a material impact on our results of operation and/or financial condition. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 3 to the
Financial Statements included in Item 6 of this Form 10-K.

While all of the significant accounting estimates are important to the Company ’s financial statements, the following accounting policies and the estimates

derived there from have been identified as being critical.

Accounts Receivable:

Accounts receivable are stated at the amounts billed to customers, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. The Company provides an allowance
for uncollectable accounts based on a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. The allowance for
uncollectible amounts is continually reviewed and adjusted to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to cover future losses. The allowance is
management's best estimate of uncollectible amounts and is determined based on historical collection experience related to accounts receivable coupled with a
review of the current status of existing receivables. The losses ultimately incurred could differ materially in the near term from the amounts estimated in
determining the allowance.

Long-Lived Assets:

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impa irment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recovered. The Company looks primarily to the discounted future cash flows in its assessment of whether or
not long-lived assets have been impaired. No impairments were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.

Income Taxes:

The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a
change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities will be recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income taxes are
classified as a net current or non-current asset or liability based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting purposes. A deferred
tax asset or liability that is not related to an asset or liability for financial reporting is classified according to the expected reversal date. The Company records a
valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that it believes is more likely than not expected to be realized.

The Company accounts for any uncertainty in income taxes by recognizing the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not
that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company measures the tax
benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate resolution. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. As
such, the Company is required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance
surrounding income tax law and regulations change over time and may result in changes to the Company’s subjective assumptions and judgments which can
materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income. The result of the reassessment of the
Company’s tax positions did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Interest and penalties associated with tax positions are recorded in the period assessed as income tax expense. The Company files income tax returns
in the United States and in the states in which it conducts its business operations. The Company’s United States federal income tax filings for tax years 2013
through 2017 remain open to examination. In general, the Company’s various state tax filings remain open for tax years 2013 to 2017.

Stock-based Compensation:

The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model as a method for determining the estimated fair value for stock options awarded to employees,
officers, and directors. The expected term of the options is based upon evaluation of historical and expected further exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate
is based upon U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life of the grant. Volatility is determined upon
historical volatility of our stock and adjusted if future volatility is expected to vary from historical experience. The dividend yield is assumed to be none as we have
not paid dividends nor do we anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company uses a Binomial Lattice ("Lattice") model to determine the fair value of certain warrants. The expected term used was the remaining
contractual term. Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility over a term consistent with the remaining term. The risk-free interest rate is derived from
the yield on zero-coupon U.S. government securities with a remaining term equal to the contractual term of the warrants. The dividend yield is assumed to be
none.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this Item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Financial Statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Enservco Corporation
Denver, Colorado

OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Enservco Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for each year in the two‑year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related
notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each year in the two‑year period ended December 31,
2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BASIS FOR OPINION

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial
statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and
are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor
were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ EKS&H LLLP

March 22, 2018
Denver, Colorado

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2009.

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Inventories
Income tax receivable, current
Total current assets

Property and Equipment, net
Income tax receivable, noncurrent
Other Assets

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt
Total current liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities

Senior revolving credit facility
Subordinated debt
Long-term debt, less current portion
Deferred income taxes, net
Warrant liability

Total long-term liabilities
Total liabilities

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)

Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred stock. $0.005 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock. $0.005 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 51,197,989 and 51,171,260 shares issued,
respectively; 103,600 shares of treasury stock; and 51,094,389 and 51,067,660 shares outstanding,
respectively
Additional paid-in-capital
Accumulated deficit

Total stockholders’ equity

December 31,

2017

2016

391 $
11,761
868
576
57
13,653

29,417
57
1,123

44,250 $

5,465 $
182
5,647

27,066
2,229
252
-
831
30,378
36,025

621
4,814
971
407
224
7,037

34,618
-
715

42,370

3,683
318
4,001

23,181
-
304
469
-
23,954
27,955

255
19,571
(11,601)
8,225

255
18,868
(4,708)
14,415

42,370

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

44,250 $

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)

Revenues

Well enhancement services
Water transfer services
Water hauling services
Construction services
Other

Total revenues

Expenses

Well enhancement services
Water transfer services
Water hauling services
Construction services
Functional support
General and administrative expenses
Patent litigation and defense costs
Severance and transition costs
Depreciation and amortization

Total operating expenses

Loss from operations

Other income (expense)

Interest expense
(Loss) gain on disposal of equipment
Other (expense) income

Total other expense

Loss before tax benefit
Income tax benefit
Net loss

Loss per common share – basic and diluted

Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2017

2016

34,686 $
2,128
3,684
254
-
40,752

25,902
2,666
3,979
212
845
4,459
129
784
6,488
45,464

17,864
184
3,838
2,713
9
24,608

15,654
1,629
3,797
2,992
749
3,780
151
-
6,865
35,617

(4,712)

(11,009)

(2,261)
(18)
(463)
(2,742)

(7,454)
561
(6,893) $

(1,766)
242
44
(1,480)

(12,489)
3,938
(8,551)

(0.13) $

(0.22)

51,070

39,117

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)

Common
Shares

Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Accumulated
Earnings
(Deficit)

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

Balance at January 1, 2016

38,127 $

191 $

13,852 $

3,843 $

17,886

Stock issued in secondary offering
Stock issued for services
Stock-based compensation
Net loss

12,938
3
-
-

64
-
-
-

4,352
2
662
-

-
-
-
(8,551)

4,416
2
662
(8,551)

Balance at December 31, 2016

51,068 $

255 $

18,868 $

(4,708) $

14,415

Cashless exercise of warrants, net of issuance costs
Stock-based compensation, net of issuance costs
Net loss

26
-
-

-
-
-

-
703
-

-
-
(6,893)

Balance at December 31, 2017

51,094 $

255 $

19,571 $

(11,601) $

-
703
(6,893)

8,225

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2017

2016

(6,893) $

6,488
18
524
(331)
704
-
484
37

(7,069)
(168)
84
111
(403)
2,425
(3,989)

(1,766)
183
279
(1,304)

(1)

4,312
1,000
(189)
(59)

5,063

(230)

621

391

674
$
(222) $

$
1,500
(1,500) $
$
1,124

$
$

$
$
$

Depreciation and amortization
Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment
Unrealized loss on fair value of warrants
Deferred income taxes
Stock-based compensation
Stock issued for services
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount
Provision for bad debt expense

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Income taxes receivable
Other assets
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Net cash used in operating activities

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchases of property and equipment
Proceeds from insurance claims
Proceeds from disposal of equipment

Net cash used in investing activities

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Gross proceeds from stock issuance
Stock issuance costs and registration fees
Net line of credit borrowings
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Repayment of long-term debt
Payment of debt issuance costs for credit facilities

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period

Supplemental cash flow information:

Cash paid for interest
Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:

Non-cash proceeds from subordinated debt borrowings
Non-cash repayment of revolving credit facility
Non-cash proceeds from revolving credit facility

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

(8,551)

6,865
(242)
-
(3,938)
662
2
153
157

2,066
(99)
261
(1)
26
642
(1,997)

(5,165)
280
139
(4,746)

5,175
(758)
2,474
-
(282)
(50)
6,559

(184)

805

621

67
14

-
-
1,543

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Enservco Corporation (“ Enservco”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”, “we” or “us”) provide various services to
the domestic onshore oil and natural gas industry. These services include frac water heating, hot oiling and acidizing (well enhancement services); water transfer
and water treatment services (Water Transfer Services); water hauling, fluid disposal, frac tank rental (water hauling services); and dirt hauling and other general
oilfield services (construction services).

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been derived from the accoun ting records of Enservco Corporation, Heat Waves Hot Oil
Service LLC (“Heat Waves”), Dillco Fluid Service, Inc. (“Dillco”), Heat Waves Water Management LLC (“HWWM”), Trinidad Housing LLC, HE Services LLC, and
Real GC LLC (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the results of operations for the years then ended.

The below table provides an overview of the Company ’s current ownership hierarchy:

Name

Dillco Fluid Service, Inc.

State of
Formation
Kansas

Ownership
100% by Enservco

Oil and natural gas field fluid logistic services.

Business

Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Oil and natural gas well services, including logistics and
stimulation.

Heat Waves Water Management
LLC

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Water Transfer and Water Treatment Services.

HE Services LLC (“HES”)

Nevada

100% by Heat Waves

Real GC, LLC (“ Real GC”)

Colorado

100% by Heat Waves

No active business operations. Owns construction
equipment used by Heat Waves.

No active business operations. Owns real property in
Garden City, Kansas that is utilized by Heat Waves.

On November 24, 2015, HWWM was organized under Colorado law as a wholly owned subsidiary of Enservco for the purpose of launching a new water
management division. Effective January 1, 2016, HWWM acquired various water transfer assets from WET Oil Services, LLC (“WET”) and HII Technologies, Inc.
and its affiliates (“HIIT”) for approximately $4.3 million. As part of the HIIT transaction, HWWM also acquired a license for a new water treatment technology
utilized in devices sold under the name of HydroFLOW for the oil and gas industry. HydroFLOW products offer water treatment services based on patented
hydropath technology that can remove bacteria and scale from water using electrical induction to reduce or eliminate down-hole scaling and corrosion. HWWM
provides water transfer services and water treatment services to the onshore oil and natural gas sector.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of

America (“GAAP”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – Liquidity and Management's Plans

As described in more detail in Note 5, Revolving Credit Facilities on August 10, 2017, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the "2017 Credit
Agreement") with East West Bank, a California banking corporation ("East West Bank"), which provides for a three-year $30 million senior secured revolving
credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”). On August 10, 2017, we repaid approximately $21.5 million due under our prior credit facility with PNC Bank (the "Prior
Credit Facility") provided pursuant to the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement with PNC Bank, N.A. (the "2014 Credit
Agreement") using proceeds from New Credit Facility. Upon entering the 2017 Credit Agreement and repaying all amounts due pursuant to the 2014 Credit
Agreement, we had availability of approximately $4.6 million under the New Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2017, our available liquidity was approximately $ 2.4 million, which was substantially comprised of $2.1 million of availability under

the New Credit Facility provided pursuant to the 2017 Credit Agreement and approximately $391,000 in cash.

As of September 30, 2017, we were in violation of a loan covenant under the New Credit Facility that requires our Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement) (“FCCR”) to be not less than 1.10 to 1.00 at the end of each month, with a buildup beginning with January 1,
2017. Our FCCR as of September 30, 2017, was 0.62, calculated in accordance with the 2017 Credit Agreement, and constituted an Event of Default, as defined
in the 2017 Credit Agreement. On November 20, 2017, we entered into the First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Waiver with East
West Bank whereby East West Bank agreed to waive the default as well as the requirement for the months ending October 31, 2017 and
November 30, 2017 for an Amendment and Waiver fee of $20,000. As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants contained
in the 2017 Credit Agreement.

On March 31, 2017, the Company entered into the Tenth Amendment to the 2014 Credit Agreement that among other things (i) required t he Company
to raise $1.5 million in subordinated debt or post a letter of credit in favor of the bank by March 31, 2017; (ii) raise an additional $1 million of subordinated debt by
May 15, 2017; (iii) reduced the maturity date of the loan from September 12, 2019 to April 30, 2018; (iv) changed the definition of Adjusted EBITDA to include
proceeds from subordinated debt; and (v) change the calculation of fixed charge and leverage ratio from a trailing four-quarter basis to a quarterly build from the
quarter ended December 31, 2016. On March 31, 2017, the Company’s largest shareholder posted a letter of credit in the amount of $1.5 million in accordance
with the terms of the Tenth Amendment. As a result of moving the maturity date to April 30, 2018, the entire loan balance (approximately $25.7 million as of
March 28, 2017) was be classified as a current liability beginning in May 2017.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s available liquidity was $5.2 million, which was substantially comprised of $4.5 million of availability on the

Prior Credit Facility and $621,000 in cash. The Company continues to borrow from the New Credit Facility to fund working capital needs.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred substantial losses and negative cash from operations of approximately

$4.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The Company’s current operating plan indicates that it may continue to incur losses from operations.

Note 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company
continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions with which it invests. Enservco maintains its excess cash in various
financial institutions, where deposits may exceed federally insured amounts at times.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at the amounts billed to customers, net of an allowance fo r uncollectible accounts. The Company provides an allowance
for uncollectable accounts based on a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. The allowance for
uncollectible amounts is continually reviewed and adjusted to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to cover future losses. The allowance is
management's best estimate of uncollectible amounts and is determined based on historical collection experience related to accounts receivable coupled with a
review of the current status of existing receivables. The losses ultimately incurred could differ materially in the near term from the amounts estimated in
determining the allowance. As of December 31, 2017, a n d December 31, 2016, the Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately
$70,000 and $34,000, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2017 a n d 2016, the Company recorded bad debt expense (net of recoveries)
of approximately $37,000 and $157,000, respectively.

Concentrations

As of December 31, 2017, one customer comprised more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance; at approximately 11%. Revenues
from this customer represented approximately 8% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, there was one other customer which
represented more than 10% of total revenue for the year at approximately 13% for the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, three
customers each comprised more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance; at approximately 14%, 14% and 11%, respectively. Revenues from
these three customers represented 14%, 11% and 12% of total revenues, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Inventories

Inventory consists primarily of propane, diesel fuel and chemicals that are used in the servicing of oil wells and is carried at the lower of cost or net
realizable value in accordance with the first in, first out method (FIFO). The company periodically reviews the value of items in inventory and provides write-
downs or write-offs, of inventory based on its assessment of market conditions. Write-downs and write-offs are charged to cost of goods sold. During the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not recognize any write-downs or write-offs of inventory.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of ( 1) trucks, trailers and pickups; (2) water transfer pumps, pipe, lay flat hose, trailers, and other support equipment;
(3) real property which includes land and buildings used for office and shop facilities and wells u sed for the disposal of water; and ( 4) other equipment such as
tools used for maintaining and repairing vehicles, office furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment. Property and equipment is stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation. The Company capitalizes interest on certain qualifying assets that are undergoing activities to prepare them for their intended use.
Interest costs incurred during the fabrication period are capitalized and amortized over the life of the assets. The Company charges repairs and maintenance
against income when incurred and capitalizes renewals and betterments, which extend the remaining useful life, expand the capacity or efficiency of the assets.
Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of 5 to 30 years.

Any difference between net book value of the property and equipment and the proceeds of an assets ’ sale or settlement of an insurance claim is

recorded as a gain or loss in the Company’s earnings.

Leases

The Company conducts a m ajor part of its operations from leased facilities. Each of these leases is accounted for as operating leases. Normally, the
Company records rental expense on its operating leases over the lease term as it becomes payable. If rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis,
per terms of the agreement, the Company records a deferred rent expense and recognizes the rental expense on a straight-line basis throughout the lease term.
The majority of the Company’s facility leases contain renewal clauses and expire through June 2022. In most cases, management expects that in the normal
course of business, leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases. As of December 31, 2017, and 2016, the Company had a deferred rent liability of
approximately $96,000 and $92,000, respectively.

The Company amortizes leasehold improvements over the shorter of the life of the lease or the life of the improvements. During the years ended

December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized amortization for leasehold improvements o f approximately $39,000 and $26,000.

The Company has leased trucks and equipment in the normal course of business, which were recorded as an operating lease. The Company recorded
rental expense on equipment under operating leases over the lease term as it becomes payable; there were no rent escalation terms associated with these
equipment leases. The equipment leases contained a purchase options that allowed the Company to purchase the leased equipment at the end of the lease
term, based on the market price of the equipment at the time of the lease termination. There are no significant equipment leases outstanding as of December 31,
2017 and 2016.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset
may not be recovered. The Company reviews both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the business during the analysis of impairment. During the quantitative
review, the Company reviews the undiscounted future cash flows in its assessment of whether or not long-lived assets have been impaired. No impairments
were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, services are provided, and collection is

reasonably assured.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the diluted weighted average number of common shares. The diluted weighted average
number of common shares is computed using the treasury stock method for common stock that may be issued for outstanding stock options and warrants.

As of December 31, 2017, and 2016, there were outstanding stock options and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 6,457,335 and 4,391,169 shares of
Company common stock, respectively, which have a potentially dilutive impact on earnings per share. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the
Company incurred losses of approximately $6.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding
stock options and warrants was approximately $1.5 million. Dilution is not permitted if there are net losses during the period. As such, the Company does not
show dilutive earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Loan Fees and Other Deferred Costs

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into loan agreements and amendments thereto with its primary lending institutions. The majority
of these lending agreements and amendments require origination fees and other fees in the course of executing the agreements. For all costs associated with
the execution of the lending agreements, the Company recognizes these as capitalized costs and amortizes these costs over the term of the loan agreement. All
other costs not associated with the execution of the loan agreements are expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $232,000 in
unamortized loan fees and other deferred costs associated with the 2017 Credit Agreement, which we expect to charge to expense ratably over the three-year
term of that agreement.

Derivative Instruments

From time to time, the Company has interest rate swap agreements in place to hedge against changes in interest rates. The fair value of the Company ’s
derivative instruments are reflected as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends
on the intended use of the derivative instrument and the resulting designation. Transactions related to the Company’s derivative instruments accounted for as
hedges are classified in the same category as the item hedged in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company did not hold derivative instruments for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, for trading purposes.

In connection with the termination of the 2014 Credit Agreement, on August 10, 2017, we terminated the interest rate swap agreement with
PNC. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement were recorded in earnings. The Company was not party to any hedges as of December 31,
2017.

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets (Note 8) based on the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities will be recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Deferred income taxes are classified as a net current or non-current asset or liability based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial
reporting purposes. A deferred tax asset or liability that is not related to an asset or liability for financial reporting is classified according to the expected reversal
date. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that it believes is more likely than not expected to be realized.

Interest and penalties associated with tax positions are recorded in the peri od assessed as income tax expense. The Company files income tax returns
in the United States and in the states in which it conducts its business operations. The Company’s United States federal income tax filings for tax years
2013 through 2017 remain open to examination. In general, the Company’s various state tax filings remain open for tax years 2013 to 2017.

Fair Value

The Company follows authoritative guidance that applies to all financial assets and liabilities required to be measured and reported on a fair value basis.
The Company also applies the guidance to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including non-competition
agreements and goodwill. The guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that
maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.

Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. For 2017 the Company valued its warrants using the Binomial Lattice model. The
Company did not have any transfers between hierarchy levels during the year ended December 31, 2017. The financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are
classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:

Level 1:
Level 2:
Level 3:

Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities that are observable for the asset or liability; or

Unobservable pricing inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources, such as discounted cash flow models or valuations.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the award as described below, and is recognized

over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the equity grant.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model as a method for determining the estimated grant date fair value for all stock options awarded to
employees, independent contractors, officers, and directors. The expected term of the options is based upon evaluation of historical and expected exercise
behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based upon U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life of the
grant. Volatility is determined upon historical volatility of our stock and adjusted if future volatility is expected to vary from historical experience. The dividend yield
is assumed to be none as we have not paid dividends nor do we anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Management Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates
include the realization of accounts receivable, evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation expense, income tax provision, the
valuation of deferred taxes, and the valuation of warrant liability and the Company’s interest rate swap. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the fiscal 2017 presentation. These reclassifications have

no effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued

I n May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new revenue recognition guidance under Accounting Standards Update
("ASU") 2014-09 that will supersede the existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The new standard focuses on creating a single source of revenue
guidance for revenue arising from contracts with customers for all industries. The objective of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue when it
transfers the promised goods or services to its customers at an amount that represents what the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods
or services. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year (ASU 2015-14). This ASU will now be effective for annual periods, and interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original effective date of
December 15, 2016. Since the issuance of the original standard, the FASB has issued several other subsequent updates including the following: 1) clarification
of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations (ASU 2016-08); 2) further guidance on identifying performance obligations in a contract
as well as clarifications on the licensing implementation guidance (ASU 2016-10); 3) rescission of several SEC Staff Announcements that are codified in Topic
605 (ASU 2016-11); and 4) additional guidance and practical expedients in response to identified implementation issues (ASU 2016-12). The Company will
adopt the new guidance effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach, which recognizes the cumulative effect of application recognized
on that date. The adoption of this standard will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)”, which requires a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the
balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of
expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the
beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. We continue to evaluate the impact of this new standard on our consolidated
financial statements. Once adopted, the Company expects to recognize additional assets and liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet related to operating
leases with terms longer than one year.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a
consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2016-15)”, that clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the
statement of cash flows. The guidance also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of
more than one class of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual
periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect of ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 - Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following at (amounts in thousands):

Trucks and vehicles
Water transfer equipment
Other equipment
Buildings and improvements
Land
Disposal wells
Total property and equipment
Accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment – net

Note 5 – Revolving Credit Facilities

East West Bank Revolving Credit Facility

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

54,925 $
4,688
3,160
3,551
681
391
67,396
(37,979)
29,417 $

54,267
4,520
2,898
3,984
785
391
66,845
(32,227)
34,618

O n August 10, 2017, we entered into the 2017 Credit Agreement with East West Bank which provides for a three-year $30 million senior secured
revolving credit facility (the "New Credit Facility"). The 2017 Credit Agreement allows us to borrow up to 85% of our eligible receivables and up to 85% of the
appraised value of our eligible equipment. Under the 2017 Credit Agreement, there are no required principal payments until maturity and we have the option to
pay variable interest rate based on (i) 1-month LIBOR plus a margin of 3.5% or (ii) interest at the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus a margin of 1.75%. Interest
is calculated monthly and paid in arrears. Additionally, the New Credit Facility is subject to an unused credit line fee of 0.5% per annum multiplied by the amount
by which total availability exceeds the average monthly balance of the New Credit Facility, payable monthly in arrears. The New Credit Facility is collateralized
by substantially all of our assets and subject to financial covenants. The outstanding principal loan balance matures on August 10, 2020. Under the terms of the
2017 Credit Agreement, collateral proceeds will be collected in bank-controlled lockbox accounts and credited to the New Credit Facility within one business day.

As of December 31, 2017, we had an outstanding principal loan balance under the 2017 Credit Agreement of approximately $27.1 million with interest
rates of 5.06% and 4.88% per year for $24.5 million of outstanding LIBOR Rate borrowings and 6.25% per year for the approximately $2.6 million of outstanding
Prime Rate borrowings. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $2.1 million was available to be drawn under the 2017 Credit Agreement, subject to limitations
including the minimum liquidity covenant described below.

Under to the 2017 Credit Agreement, we are subject to the following financial covenants:

(1) Maintenance of a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (“FCCR”) of not less than 1.10 to 1.00 at the end of each month, with a buildup beginning on January

1, 2017, through December 31, 2017, upon which the ratio will be measured on a trailing twelve-month basis;

(2) In periods when the trailing twelve-month FCCR is less than 1.20 to 1.00, we are required to maintain minimum liquidity of $1,500,000 (including

excess availability under the 2017 Credit Agreement and balance sheet cash).

On August 10, 2017, an initial advance of approximately $21.8 million was made under the New Credit Facility to repay in full all obligations outstanding
under our Prior Credit Facility and fund certain closing costs and fees. Upon entering into the 2017 Credit Agreement, our trailing 12-month FCCR was less than
1.20 to 1.00. As a result, as of December 31, 2017 we were required to maintain minimum liquidity of $1,500,000. Our liquidity as of December 31, 2017, as
defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement, was $2.4 million. In addition, we have agreed with East West Bank that we will not pay any cash dividends on our
common stock until our obligations to East West Bank are paid in full. As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the
2017 Credit Agreement.

O n November 20, 2017, Enservco Corporation (the “Company”) entered into a First Amendment and Waiver (the “Amendment and Waiver”) with
respect to the 2017 Credit Agreement, dated November 20, 2017, by and among the Company and East West Bank. Pursuant to the Amendment and Waiver,
East West Bank waived an event of default with respect to the Company’s failure to satisfy the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio set forth in the 2017 Credit
Agreement for the reporting period ended September 30, 2017, and permitted the Company to forego testing of its fixed charge coverage ratio as of October 31,
2017 and November 30, 2017. In connection with the Amendment and Waiver, the Company agreed to pay East West Bank an amendment fee in the amount
of $20,000.

2014 PNC Credit Facility

In September 2014, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the "2014 Credit Agreement") with
PNC Bank, National Association ("PNC") which provided for a five-year $30 million senior secured revolving credit facility which replaced a prior revolving credit
facility and term loan with PNC that totaled $16 million (the "2012 Credit Agreement"). The 2014 Credit Agreement allowed the Company to borrow up to 85% of
eligible receivables and up to 75% of the appraised value of trucks and equipment. Under the 2014 Credit Agreement, there were no required principal payments
until maturity and the Company had the option to pay variable interest rate based on (i) 1, 2 or 3-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 4.50% to
5.50% for LIBOR Rate Loans or (ii) interest at PNC Base Rate plus an applicable margin of 3.00% to 4.00% for Domestic Rate Loans. Interest was calculated
monthly and added to the principal balance of the loan. Additionally, the Company incurred an unused credit line fee of 0.375%. The revolving credit facility
was collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and subject to financial covenants. On August 10, 2017 we repaid all amounts due under our
Prior Credit Facility with PNC Bank using proceeds from New Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2016, we had an outstanding principal loan balance under the 2014 Credit Agreement of $23.2 million. The interest rate at
December 31, 2016 ranged from 5.21% to 5.27% per year for the $21.3 million of outstanding LIBO R Rate Loans and 6.75% per year for the $1.9 million of
outstanding Domestic Rate Loans. As of December 31, 2016, approximately $4.5 million was available under the 2014 Credit Agreement. As of December 31,
2016, we were in compliance with our covenants under the 2014 Credit Agreement.

Debt Issuance Costs

We have capitalized certain debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the credit agreements discussed above and these costs are being amortized
to interest expense over the term of the facility on a straight-line basis. As of December 31, 2016, approximately $171,000, of unamortized debt issuance costs
were included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The long-term portion of debt issuance costs of
approximately $232,000 and $259,000 is included in Other Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for December 31, 2017 a n d 2016,
respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company amortized approximately $448,000 and $153,000 of these costs to Interest
Expense.

Interest Rate Swap

On September 17, 2015, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement wi th PNC to protect against variability in future interest payments
related to its 2014 Credit Agreement. The terms of the interest rate swap agreement included an initial notional amount of $10 million, a fixed payment rate of
1.88% plus applicable a margin ranging from 4.50% to 5.50% paid by the Company and a floating payment rate equal to LIBOR plus applicable margin of 4.50%
to 5.50% paid by PNC. The purpose of the swap agreement was to adjust the interest rate profile of the Company’s debt obligations and to achieve a targeted
mix of floating and fixed rate debt. In connection with the termination of the 2014 Credit Agreement, on August 10, 2017, we terminated the interest rate swap
agreement with PNC. Our cost to terminate the agreement was approximately $90,000, which compared to our estimate of the fair value of the swap prior to the
termination of approximately $72,000. We recorded the difference of approximately $18,000 as additional interest expense.

The cash flows were discounted by the credit risk of the Company derived by industry and Company performance. As of December 31, 2016, the

discount rate was 13.40%.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, the fair market value of the swap instrument decreased by approximately $72,000 and resulted in a
decrease to the liability and a reduction in interest expense. The interest rate swap liability is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the
Company’s balance sheet. As of December 31, 2016, the interest rate swap liability was $91,000. As of December 31, 2017, we were not party to any swap
instruments.

Note 6 – Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following at years December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

Subordinated Promissory Note, net of discount of approximately $163,000. Interest is at 10%, interest is paid
quarterly. Matures June 28, 2022

1,337 $

Subordinated Promissory Note, net of discount of approximately $108,000. Interest is at 10%, interest is paid
quarterly. Matures June 28, 2022

Real Estate Loan for our facility in North Dakota, interest at 3.75%, monthly principal and interest payment of

$5,255 ending October 3, 2028. Collateralized by land and property purchased with the loan.

Note payable to the seller of Heat Waves. The note was garnished by the Internal Revenue Service (“ IRS”) in

2009 and is due on demand; paid in annual installments of $36,000 per agreement with the IRS.

Mortgages payable to banks, interest ranging from 5.9% to 7.25%, due in monthly principal and interest

payments of $6,105, secured by land. Remaining principal balances were paid in February 2017.

Total
Less current portion
Long-term debt, net of current portion

Aggregate maturities of debt, excluding the 2017 Credit Agreement described in Note 5, are as follows (in thousands):

892

309

125

-
2,663
(182)
2,481 $

355

170

97
622
(318)
304

Years Ended December 31,

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total

182
54
56
59
2,290
22
2,663

Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair

value hierarchy (in thousands):

Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)

Fair Value Measurement Using
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Fair Value
Measurement

December 31, 2017

Derivative Instrument
Warrant liability

December 31, 2016

Derivative Instrument
Interest rate swap

Derivative Instruments

- $

831 $

831

- $

91 $

- $

The Company's warrant liability was valued as a derivative instrument at issuance and at December 31, 2017 using a Binomial Lattice ("Lattice") model,
using observable market inputs and management judgment based on the following assumptions: a risk-free interest rate of 2.14%, expected dividend yield of
0%, a term of 4.49 years, and a volatility of 89.58%. The valuation policies used are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs
used in the fair value calculations and the changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are
discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate.

The Company’s interest rate swap was valued using models which require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves,
credit spreads, and correlations of such inputs. Some of the model inputs used in valuing the derivative instruments trade in liquid markets, and therefore the
derivative instrument is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. For applicable financial assets carried at fair value, the credit standing of the
counterparties is analyzed and factored into the fair value measurement of those assets. The fair value estimates of our derivative financial instruments do not
reflect their actual trading value.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an
ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the carrying value of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and interest approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such items. The
carrying value of the Company’s credit agreements are carried at cost which are approximately the fair value of the debt as the related interest rate are at the
terms that approximate rates currently available to the Company.

The Company did not have any transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value measurement hier archy during the

years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Note 8 – Income Taxes

The income tax provision (benefit) from operations consists of the following (in thousands):

Current

Federal
State

Total Current

Deferred
Federal
State

Total Deferred

Total Income Tax Benefit

Reduction of U.S. federal corporate tax rate

December 31,

2017

2016

- $
-
-

(499)
(62)
(561)
(561) $

-
-
-

(3,577)
(361)
(3,938)
(3,938)

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”).
The Tax Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, we have recorded a decrease related to deferred tax
assets of approximately $585,000, with a corresponding adjustment to deferred income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2017.

A reconciliation of computed income taxes by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% and 34% to income (loss) from operations before

taxes to the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2017

2016

Computed income taxes at 21% and 34% for 2017 and 2016, respectively

(2,533) $

(4,229)

Increase in income taxes resulting from:

State and local income taxes, net of federal impact
Change in valuation allowance
Stock-based compensation
Change in tax rate
Other

(202)
1,193
408
585
(12)

(373)
389
262
-
13

Benefit for income taxes

(561) $

(3,938)

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are

deductible, management believes a valuation allowance should be recorded to reduce its net deferred tax assets to zero.

We have a requirement of reporting of taxes based on tax positions which meet a more likely than not standard and which are measured at the amount
that is more likely than not to be realized. Differences between financial and tax reporting which do not meet this threshold are required to be recorded as
unrecognized tax benefits. This standard also provides guidance on the presentation of tax matters and the recognition of potential IRS interest and penalties. As
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company does not have an unrecognized tax liability.

The Company has approximately $20.0 million of net operating losses that will begin to expire in the year 2035.

The components of deferred income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

Deferred tax assets

Reserves and accruals
Amortization
Capital losses and other
Non-qualified stock option expense
Tax credits
Loss Carryforwards

Total deferred tax assets

Valuation allowance

Net deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities

Depreciation

Total deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

December 31,

2017

2016

204 $
41
1
164
-
5,116
5,526
(1,500)
4,026

(4,026)
(4,026)

- $

239
100
1
390
113
5.949
6,792
(390)
6,402

(6,871)
(6,871)

(469)

The Company uses significant judgment in forming conclusions regarding the recoverability of its deferred tax assets and evaluates all available positive
and negative evidence to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. To the extent recovery does not appear likely, a
valuation allowance must be recorded. As of December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $1.5 million and $0.4 million as of December
31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

It is possible that the relative weight of positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax assets may change, which could result in
a material increase or decrease in the Company’s valuation allowance. Such a change could result in a material increase or decrease to income tax expense in
the period the assessment was made.

The Company classifies penalty and interest expense related to income tax liabilities as an other ex pense. During the year ended December 31, 2017,

The Company did not incur any interest and penalties for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company files tax re turns in the United States, in various states including Colorado, Kansas, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The
Company’s United States federal income tax filings for tax years 2014 through 2017 remain open to examination. In general, the Company’s various state tax
filings remain open for tax years 2013 to 2017.

Note 9 – Stockholders Equity

Secondary Stock Offering

On December 2, 2016, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement for the offer and sale in a firm commitment offering of 11,250,000 shares of
the Company’s common stock, $0.005 par value per share, at a public offering price of $0.40 per share. Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Company
granted the Underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to 1,687,500 additional shares of Common Stock (the “Additional Shares” and, together with the Initial
Shares, the “Shares”) at the public offering price. On December 5, 2016, the Underwriter exercised in full its option to purchase the Additional Shares. The
Company collected gross proceeds of $5.2 million which was offset by offering costs of $759,000, for net proceeds of $4.4 million. The offering costs were
recorded within additional paid in capital. The Company used the net proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness under its revolving credit facility thereby
increasing its liquidity for general corporate purposes, working capital, acquisitions and/or capital expenditures.

Stock Issued for Services

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock for services. During the year ended
December 2016, the Company issued 3,031 shares of common stock to a consultant as partial compensation for services provided to the Company. The shares
were granted under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and were fully vested and unrestricted at the time of issuance. For the years ended December 31, 2016, the
Company recorded approximately $2,000 of consulting expense for these services as non-cash compensation in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations.

Warrants

A summary of warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

Warrants

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2016

Issued
Exercised
Forfeited/Cancelled

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

Issued
Exercised
Forfeited/Cancelled

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

150,001 $
30,000
-
-
180,001 $
1,612,902
(112,500)
(37,500)
1,642,903 $

1,642,903 $

0.55
0.70
-
-
0.57
0.31
0.55
-
0.32

0.32

1.9 $
4.5
-
-
1.5 $
4.5
-
-
4.5 $

4.5 $

-
-
-
-
2
539
-
-
539

539

In June 2016, the Company granted a principal of the Company ’s existing investor relations firm warrants to acquire 30,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock in connection with a reduction of the firms ongoing monthly cash service fees. The warrants were issued at an initial exercise price of $0.70 per
share, subject to further adjustment based on a volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) for the 10 days prior to the issuance date of the warrants. There were
no adjustments made to the exercise price at date of issuance. The warrants had a grant-date fair value of $0.36 per share and vest over a one-year period,
15,000 on December 21, 2016 and 15,000 on June 21, 2017, provided the principal of the investor relations firm remains a consultant of the Company at time of
vesting. As of December 31, 2017, all of these warrants remain outstanding.

I n June 2017, in connection with a subordinated loan agreement described in more detail in Note 5, the Company granted Cross River Partners,
L.P. two five -year warrants to buy an aggregate total of 1,612,902 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.31 per share, the average
closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 20-day period ended May 11, 2017. The warrants had a grant-date fair value of $0.19 per share and
vested in full on June 28, 2017. These warrants are accounted for as a liability in the accompanying balance sheet. As of December 31, 2017, all of these
warrants remain outstanding.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, 112,500 warrants were exercised using the cashless option to acquire 26,729 shares of common stock. The

warrants exercised had a total intrinsic value of approximately $19,000 at the time of exercise.

Note 10 – Stock Options

Stock Option Plans

O n July 27, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The aggregate number of shares of
common stock that could be granted under the 2010 Plan was reset at the beginning of each year based on 15% of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding. As such, on January 1, 2016 the number of shares of common stock available under the 2010 Plan was reset to 5,719,069 shares based upon
38,127,129 shares outstanding on that date. Options were typically granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair value of the Company's common
stock at the date of grant with a vesting schedule of one to three years and a contractual term of 5 years. As discussed below, the 2010 Plan has been replaced
by a new stock option plan and no additional stock option grants will be granted under the 2010 Plan. As of December 31, 2017, there were options to purchase
1,467,773 shares outstanding under the 2010 Plan.

On July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the adoption of the Enservco Corporation 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”),
which was approved by the stockholders on September 29, 2016. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be granted under the 2016 Plan
is 8,000,000 shares plus authorized and unissued shares from the 2010 Plan totaling 2,391,711 for a total reserve of 10,391,711 shares. As of December 31,
2017, there were options to purchase 3,346,660 shares outstanding under the 2016 Plan.

A summary of the range of assumptions used to value stock options granted for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Expected term (in years)

For the Years Ended December 31,

2017

2016

89
1.4
-
3.0

-
–
-
–

93%
1.5%
-
3.5

81
0.57
-
1.0

-
–
-
–

104%
1.02%
-
3.5

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted options to acquire 2,971,600 shares of common stock with a weighted-average grant-
date fair value of $0.19 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017, no options were exercised. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the
Company granted options to acquire 3,525,000 shares of common stock with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $0.28 per share. During the year
ended December 31, 2016, no options were exercised.

The following is a summary of stock option activity for all equity plans for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):

Outstanding at January 1, 2016

Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or Expired

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or Expired

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

Vested or Expected to Vest at December 31, 2017
Exercisable at December 31, 2017

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

1.31
0.78
-
0.96

1.09
0.32
-
0.90
0.71
1.02
1.02

2.53 $

2.85 $

3.46 $
2.77 $
2.77 $

1,007
317

317

3,485,168 $
3,525,000
-
(2,799,000)

4,211,168 $
2,971,600
-
(2,368,334)
4,814,434 $
2,282,834 $
2,282,834 $

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the estimated fair value of the Company ’s
common stock and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had they exercised
their options on December 31, 2017.

As discussed below in the Forfeiture and Grant of Stock Options paragraph, on July 18, 2016, options to purchase 2,560,000 shares of common stock
that were granted under the 2010 Plan to certain officers and directors were cancelled pursuant to certain letter agreements. The Company subsequently
granted options to purchase 1,960,000 of shares under the 2016 Plan, which was approved by the stockholders on September 29, 2016. The New Options
contain relatively the same terms as the forfeited options, with the exception that the exercise price on New Options was not below the closing market price on
the date the Special Committee approved the New Options. Accordingly, the Company treated the forfeiture and granting of New Options as a modification of
stock options for accounting purposes.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recog nized stock-based compensation costs for stock options of approximately
$704,000 and $662,000, respectively, in general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2017, the Company expected all outstanding options to vest.
Compensation cost is revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of options vested due to service is likely to differ from previous
estimates.

A summary of the status of non-vested shares underlying the options are presented below:

Non-vested at January 1, 2016

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2016

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2017

Number of
Shares

Weighted-
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value

1,323,669 $
3,525,000
(1,934,835)
(1,254,000)
1,659,834 $
2,971,600
(2,003,167)
(96,668)
2,531,599 $

1.22
0.28
0.49
0.56
0.58
0.19
0.43
0.55
0.24

As of December 31, 2017, there was approximately $554,00 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested shares under the qualified

stock option plans which will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average period of 1.42 years.

Forfeiture and Grant of Stock Options

On June 17, 2016, the Board of Directors appointed a special committee of disinterested directors (the “Special Committee”) to address certain claims in
a letter dated June 14, 2016 from an attorney purporting to represent a stockholder of the Company regarding the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“2010 Plan”) and equity awards granted thereunder. After investigation and consultation with special counsel, the Special Committee verified that certain stock
options granted under the 2010 Plan had exceeded an applicable limitation in the 2010 Plan.

O n July 7, 2016, the Special Committee unanimously approved: (a) the rescission (and forfeiture by the holders) of certain stock option awards to
purchase 2,560,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that had been granted to various officers and directors in excess of the 2010 Plan’s limitations
(“Excess Shares”), and (b) the grant of new options to purchase 1,960,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “New Options”), pursuant to the 2016
Plan. The New Options were subject to: (i) each of the option holders entering into a rescission letter agreement with the Company and (ii) stockholder approval
of the 2016 Plan.

On July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved t he adoption of the 2016 Plan, which after stockholder approval thereof, replaced the
2010 Plan. Further, the Company entered into rescission letter agreements with the various executive officers and directors whereby each such officer/director
agreed to forfeit their Excess Shares. The Company agreed to grant the New Options pursuant to new stock option agreements that provide for vesting on
substantially the same schedule as the Excess Shares would have vested but could not have been exercised prior to stockholder approval of the 2016 Plan on
September 29, 2016. The exercise price of the New Options is the greater of the original exercise price of the Excess Shares or the closing market price on July
7, 2016, the date the Special Committee approved the New Options. Under the letter agreements, the termination date of each New Option is the termination
date of the rescinded option, except that if the termination date of the rescinded option is prior to the two-year anniversary of the date of the letter agreement,
then the termination date of the New Option is extended six months past the termination date of the rescinded option. Further, the Company agreed to submit
the 2016 Plan to the stockholders of the Company for approval and on September 29, 2016, the stockholders approved the 2016 Plan. The re-priced options did
not have any change in the non-cash compensation recognize during the period, since the re-priced fair-value was not in excess of the original fair value.

In November 2016, the Special Committee reached a settlement with the attorney and stockholder that sent the initial demand letter and agreed to pay

an immaterial amount in settlement of the matter above.

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

As of December 31, 2017, the Company leases facilities under lease commitments that expire through August 2022. All of these facility leases are

accounted for as operating leases. Future minimum lease commitments for these facilities and other operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter

Total

654
633
574
377
181
-
2,419

Rent expense under operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $808,000 and $789,000, respectively.

HydroFLOW Agreement

Pursuant to a Sales Agreement with HydroFLOW USA, HWWM has the exclusive right to sell or rent patented hydropath devices in connection with
bacteria deactivation and scale treatment services for treating injection and disposal wells, fracking water and recycled water in the oil and gas industry to
HWWM customers in the United States. Pursuant to the sales agreement, HWWM is required to pay 3.5% royalties of its gross revenues on certain rental
transactions and, in order to maintain the exclusivity provision under the agreement, the Company must purchase approximately $655,000 of equipment per year
commencing in 2016 and ending 2025. In November 2016, the Company and HydroFLOW USA agreed to allocate $220,000 of the 2016 commitment to 2017,
thereby increasing the minimum purchase requirement for 2017 to $875,000. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company completed the purchase
of $280,000 of equipment to fulfill its 2016 purchase commitment for exclusivity. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not
accrue or pay any royalties to HydroFLOW. The Company has negotiated a release of all 2016 and 2017 purchase commitments, while leaving intact the
exclusive right to sell or rent the patented hydropath devices through 2017. As of January 9, 2018, the Company terminated its Sales Agreement with
HydroFLOW USA.

Self-Insurance

In June 2015, the Company elected to become self-insured under its Employee Group Medical Plan for the first $50,000 per individual participant. The
Company has accrued a liability of approximately $102,000 and $23,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for insurance claims
that it anticipates paying in the future related to incidents that occurred during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Effective April 1, 2015, the Company entered into a workers ’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance policy with a term through March 31, 2018.
Under the terms of the policy, the Company is required to pay premiums in addition to a portion of the cost of any claims made by our employees, up to a
maximum of approximately $1.5 million over the term of the policy. In June 2017, an employee of one of our subsidiaries sustained bodily injury while in the
course of employment, and the projected cost of the claim exceeded the amount we had previously paid in under the policy. As a result, during the year ended
December 30, 2017, we made a payment of approximately $612,000 under the terms of the policy. The amount was based on an estimate of the total cost of
the claim, including costs that, as of December 31, 2017, have not yet been paid in connection with the claim. During the year ended December 31, 2017, our
insurance carrier formally denied the workers' compensation claim and is moving to close the claim entirely. We recorded approximately $438,000 in payments
made under the plan as a long-term asset, which we expect will either be recorded as expense or refunded to us by our insurance carrier, depending on the
outcome of the claim described above and any additional claims incurred under the policy. Per the terms of our policy, through December 31, 2017, we had paid
in approximately $1.6 million of the projected maximum plan cost of $1.6 million. As of December 31, 2017, we estimate that our maximum continued exposure
to this and other workers' compensation claims through the term of our policy and additional policy premiums is approximately $161,000.

Litigation

Enservco Corporation (“ Enservco”) and its subsidiary Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC (“Heat Waves”) are defendants in a civil lawsuit in federal court in
Colorado, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00983-RBJ (“Colorado Case”), that alleges that Enservco and Heat Waves, in offering and selling frac water heating services,
infringed and induced others to infringe two patents owned by Heat-On-The-Fly, LLC (“HOTF”). The complaint relates to only a portion of the frac water heating
services provided by Heat Waves. The Colorado Case is now stayed pending resolution of an appeal by HOTF of a North Dakota court’s ruling that the primary
patent (“the ‘993 Patent”) in the Colorado Case was invalid. Neither Enservco nor Heat Waves is a party to the North Dakota Case, which involves other energy
companies.

In the event that HOTF’s appeal is successful and the ‘993 Patent is found to be valid and/or enforceable in the North Dakota Case, the Colorado Case
m a y resume. To the extent that Enservco and Heat Waves are unsuccessful in their defense of the Colorado Case, they could be liable for enhanced
damages/attorneys’ fees (both of which may be significant) and Heat Waves could possibly be enjoined from using any technology that is determined to be
infringing. Either result could negatively impact Heat Waves’ business and operations. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of this case,
and accordingly has not recorded an accrual for any potential loss.

Note 12- Segment Reporting

Enservco’s reportable business segments are Well Enhancement Services, Water Transfer Services, Water Hauling Services, and Construction
Services. These segments have been selected based on management’s resource allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding the
Company.

The following is a description of the segments.

Water Transfer Services: This segment utilizes a high and low volume pumps, lay flat hose, aluminum pipe and manifolds and related equipment to
move fresh and/or recycled water from a water source such as a pond, lake, river, stream, or water storage facility to frac tanks at drilling locations to be
used in connection with well completion activities. Also included in this segment are water treatment services whereby the Company uses patented
hydropath technology under a sales agreement with HydroFLOW USA to remove bacteria and scale from water.

Construction Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of trucks and equipment to provide excavation grading, and dirt hauling services to the oil and gas
and construction industry. In 2016, the Company started utilizing these assets to provide dirt hauling services to a general contractor in Colorado.

Unallocated and other includes general overhead expenses and assets associated with managing all reportable operating segments which have not

been allocated to a specific segment.

The following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to Enservco ’s reportable segments (in thousands):

Well

Enhancement

Water
Transfer
Services

Water
Hauling

Construction
Services

Unallocated
& Other

Total

Year Ended December 31, 2017:

Revenues
Cost of Revenue
Segment Profit

Depreciation and Amortization

Capital Expenditures

Identifiable assets(1)

Year Ended December 31, 2016:

Revenues
Cost of Revenue
Segment Profit

Depreciation and Amortization

Capital Expenditures (Excluding
Acquisitions)

Identifiable assets(1)

34,686 $
25,902
8,784 $

2,128 $
2,666
(538) $

3,684 $
3,979
(295) $

4,817 $

985 $

655 $

1,184 $

487 $

89 $

37,651 $

2,986 $

1,730 $

254 $
212
42 $

- $

- $
845
(845) $

40,752
33,604
7,148

31 $

6,488

6 $

1,766

511 $

42,878

17,864 $
15,654
2,210 $

184 $
1,629
(1,445) $

3,838 $
3,797
41 $

2,713 $
2,992
(279) $

9 $
749
(740) $

24,608
24,821
(213)

4,932 $

1,146 $

669 $

- $

118 $

6,865

759 $

196 $

46 $

- $

16 $

1,017

33,827 $

3,516 $

2,048 $

600 $

305 $

40,296

(1)

Identifiable assets is calculated by summing the balances of accounts receivable, net; inventories; property and equipment, net; and other assets.

The following table reconcile s the segment profits reported above to the loss from operations reported in the consolidated statements of operations (in

thousands):

Segment profit (loss)
General and administrative expense
Patent litigation defense costs
Depreciation and amortization
Loss from Operations

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

7,148 $
(5,243)
(129)
(6,488)
(4,712) $

(213)
(3,780)
(151)
(6,865)
(11,009)

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information re quired to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the 1934 Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and
our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer (who is our principal executive officer), and Chief Financial Officer (who is our
principal accounting officer) has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by 1934 Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of December
31, 2017 (the end of the period covered by this report). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal accounting officer concluded
that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the 1934 Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.

The Company, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that its internal controls and procedures will pr event or
detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

In accordance with Item 308 of SEC Regulation S-K, management is required to provide an annual report regarding internal controls over our financial
reporting. This report, which includes management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, is found below. Inasmuch
as the Company is neither an accelerated filer nor a large accelerated filer, the Company is not obligated to provide an attestation report on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting by the Company’s registered public accounting firm.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (“ ICFR”) as defined in Rules 13a-
15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the 1934 Act. Our ICFR are intended to be designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our ICFR are expected to include
those policies and procedures that management believes are necessary that:

(1)

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly ref lect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the Company;

(2)

(3)

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with proper
authorizations of management and our directors; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, and accordingly, even effective internal
control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect of financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition,
effective internal control at a point in time may become ineffective in future periods because of changes in conditions or due to deterioration in the degree of
compliance with our established policies and procedures.

As of December 31, 2017, management (with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial O fficer) conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of the Company’s ICFR based on the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments by smaller reporting companies and non-
accelerated filers. Based on that assessment, management (with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer) concluded that,
during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

PART III

The information responsive to Items 401, 405, 406 and 407 of Regulation S-K to be included in our definitive proxy statement for our 2018 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2017, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Proxy Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information responsive to Items 402 and 407 of Regulation S-K to be included in our Proxy Statement is incorporated herein b y reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information responsive to Items 201(d) and 403 of Regulation S-K to be included in our proxy statement is incorporated her ein by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information responsive to Items 404 and 407 of Regulation S-K to be included in our Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information responsive to Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A to be included in our Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

Exhibit
No.

Title

3.01

3.02
3.03
10.01
10.02
10.03
10.04
10.05
10.06
10.07

10.08
10.09
10.10
10.11
10.12

10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18

10.19

10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation . (1)
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2)
Amended and Restated Bylaws. (3)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Austin Peitz. (5)(8)(9)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Ian Dickinson.
Loan and Security Agreement with East West Bank, a California banking corporation.
Form of Indemnification Agreement. (6)
2016 Stock Incentive Plan (4)
Subordinated Loan Agreement(10)
Subordinated Promissory Note – $1.0 Million(10)
Subordinated Promissory Note – $1.5 Million (10)
Warrant – 645,161 Shares (10)
Warrant – 967,741 Shares (10)
Executive Severance Agreement dated May 5, 2017, by and between Rick D. Kasch and the Company (11)
Executive Severance Agreement dated June 8, 2017, by and between Robert J. Devers and the Company (12)
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Waiver, dated November 20, 2017. (13)
Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of September 12, 2014. (16)
Consent and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated February 27, 2015 (17)
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement effective March 29, 2015. (18)
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement effective July 16, 2015. (19)
Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Pledge

Agreement effective October 19, 2015.(20)

Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement effective December 31, 2015. (21)
Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated March 29, 2016. (22)
Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement effective August 10, 2016. (23)
Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement effective October 4, 2016. (24)
Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement effective December 31, 2016 (25)
Underwriting agreement to issue and sell to William Blair & Company, LLC an offer and sale in a firm commitment offering of 11,250,000 common

stock shares.(26)

11.1
14.1
21.1
31.1
31.2
32.1

32.2

Statement of Computation of per share earnings. Filed herewith. (contained in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Whistleblower Policy. (7)
Subsidiaries of Enservco Corporation. Filed herewith.
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Principal Executive Officer). Filed herewith.
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Principal Financial Officer). Filed herewith.
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). Filed

herewith.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). Filed

herewith.

101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.LAB
101.PRE
101.DEF

XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Schema Document
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
XBRL Label Linkbase Document
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 2010, and filed on January 4, 2011.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 2014, and filed on June 25, 2014.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2010, and filed on July 28, 2010.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A and filed on August 16, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2014, and filed on July 3, 2014.
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.07 to the Company ’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2013 and filed on March 18, 2014.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2010, and filed on July 28, 2010.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2015, and filed on April 10, 2015.
Incorporated by referenc e from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 22, 2016, and filed on June 27, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 28, 2017, and filed on July 3, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 5, 2017, and filed on May 11, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 8, 2017, and filed on June 12, 2017.

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)

Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2017, and filed on November 21, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 12, 2017, and filed on December 18, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 5, 2017, and filed on May 11, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 12, 2014, and filed on September 18, 2014.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2015, and filed on March 5, 2015.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, nd filed on May 14, 2015.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, and filed on August 14, 2015.
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.12 to the Company ’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2015 and filed on March 30, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 19, 2016, and filed on January 20, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.14 to the Company ’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2015 and filed on March 30, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, and filed on August 12, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 29, 2016, and filed on October 5, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 3, 2017, and filed February 7, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2016, and filed on December 7, 2016.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the

SIGNATURES

undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

March 22, 2018

ENSERVCO CORPORATION,
a Delaware Corporation

/s/ Ian Dickinson
Principal Executive Officer and Chief Executive officer

/s/ Dustin Bradford
Principal Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer

(Power of Attorney)

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Ian Dickinson and Dustin Bradford his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
each acting along, with full power of stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the

Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Date

Name and Title

Signature

March 22, 2018

Ian Dickinson
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

/s/ Ian Dickinson

Dustin Bradford
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer)

/s/ Dustin Bradford

Richard A. Murphy
Chairman of the Board and Director

/s/ Richard A. Murphy

Keith J. Behrens
Director

Robert S. Herlin
Director

William A. Jolly
Director

Christopher Haymons
Director

/s/ Keith J. Behrens

/s/ Robert S. Herlin

/s/ William A. Jolly

/s/ Christopher Haymons

Exhibit 21.1

ENSERVCO CORPORATION
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
December 31, 2017

Name

State of Formation

Ownership

Dillco Fluid Service, Inc.

Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC

Heat Waves Water Management LLC

HE Services, LLC

Real GC, LLC

Kansas

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Nevada

100% by Heat Waves

Colorado

100% by Heat Waves

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Exhibit 31.1

I, Ian Dickinson, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Enservco Corporation;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant ’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

(b)

March 22, 2018

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant
over financial reporting.

’s internal control

/s/ Ian Dickinson
Ian Dickinson, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Exhibit 31.2

I, Dustin Bradford, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Enservco Corporation;

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

March 22, 2018

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant
over financial reporting.

’s internal control

/s/ Dustin Bradford
Dustin Bradford, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Enservco Corporation (the “ Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ian Dickinson, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

(2)

March 22, 2018

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material res pects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Ian Dickinson
Ian Dickinson, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Enservco Corporation (the “ Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dustin Bradford, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

(2)

March 22, 2018

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Dustin Bradford
Dustin Bradford, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer