Enservco Corporation Annual Report 2019

← All annual reports

FY2019 Annual Report · Enservco Corporation

Loading PDF…

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION EDGAR FILING

Enservco Corp

Form: 10-K

Date Filed: 2020-03-20

Corporate Issuer CIK: 319458

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒

☐

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from _______ to ______

Commission file number: 001-36335

ENSERVCO CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

999 18th Street, Suite 1925N
Denver, CO
(Address of principal executive offices)

84-0811316
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

80202
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (303) 333-3678

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act:

Title of each class
Common stock, $0.005 par value

Ticker Symbol
ENSV

Name of each exchange on which registered
NYSE American

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act: ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark if the r egistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act: ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the regis trant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).☑
Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the be st of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-
K. ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐

Accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes ☐ No ☑

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $16.4 million based upon the closing sale price of
the Registrants Common Stock of $0.396 as of June 28, 2019, the last trading day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. This
determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of March 16, 2020, there were 55,612,829 shares of the Enservco Corporation ’s common stock outstanding.

Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.

Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.

Item 15.
Item 16.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Description of Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures

PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information

PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Summary of Form 10-K

5
17
33
33
35
35

36
40
40
58
58
99
99
99

100
100
100
100
100

101
103

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “ forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “anticipate,” “should,” “could,” “project,” “intend,”
“estimate,” “expect,” “believe,” “predict,” “budget,” “goal,” “plan,” “forecast,” “target” and other similar expressions.

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this annual report are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from what is expressed
in or indicated by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including, among
others, the risks set forth in the section of this annual report entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere throughout this annual report, as well as the following factors:

• Our lender under our existing Loan and Security Agreement (the "2017 Credit Agreement") has declared us to be in default on our $34.0
million outstanding loan and has reserved all its rights and remedies under the agreement including the right to accelerate and declare our
loans due and payable and to foreclose on substantially all of our property.

• substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern;
•

recent significant decreases in the prices for crude oil and natural gas which will likely result in exploration and production companies cutting
back their capital expenditures for oil and gas well drilling which in turn will result in significantly reduced demand for our drilling completion
services, thereby negatively affecting our revenues and results of operations;
fierce competition for the services we provide in our areas of operations, which has increased significantly due to the recent decrease in prices
for crude oil and natural gas;

•

• constraints on us as a result of our substantial indebtedness, including restrictions imposed on us under the terms of our credit facility

agreement and our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to repay our debt obligations;

• our capital requirements and uncertainty of obtaining additional funding on terms acceptable to us;
• price volatility of oil and natural gas prices, and the effect that lower oil and natural gas prices may have on our customers’ demand for our

services, the result of which may adversely impact our revenues and stockholders' equity;

• and the impact of general economic conditions on the demand for oil and natural gas and the availability of capital which may impact our

•

ability to perform services for our customers;
the geographical diversity of our operations which, while it could diversify the risks related to a slow-down in one area of operations, also
adds significantly to our costs of doing business;

• our history of losses and working capital deficits which, at times, were significant;
• weather and environmental conditions, including abnormal warm winters in our areas of operations that adversely impact demand for our

services;

• our ability to retain key members of our management and key technical employees;
•

the impact of environmental, health and safety and other governmental regulations, and of current or pending legislation with which we and
our customers must comply;

• developments in the global economy as well as pandemic risks related to the COVID-19 virus and resulting demand and supply for oil and

natural gas;
the effects of competition;
risks relating to any unforeseen liabilities;
federal and state initiatives relating to the regulation of hydraulic fracturing; and
further sales or issuances of our common stock and the price and volume volatility of our common stock.

•
•
•
•

All forward-looking statements, express or implied, contained in this annual report are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.
This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on
our behalf may issue. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this annual report.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Enservco Corporation (“ Enservco”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”, “we” or “us”) provides various services
to the domestic onshore oil and natural gas industry. These services include frac water heating (completion services); and hot oiling and acidizing
(production services). The Company owns and operates a fleet of approximately 390 specialized trucks, trailers, frac tanks and other well-site related equipment
and serves customers in several major domestic oil and gas fields including the DJ Basin/Niobrara area in Colorado, the Bakken area in North Dakota, the
Marcellus and Utica Shale area in Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Jonah Field, Green River and Powder River Basins in Wyoming, the Eagle Ford Shale in Texas,
and the Stack and Scoop plays in the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma.

Enservco was originally in corporated as Aspen Exploration Corporation under Delaware law on February 28, 1980 as a small exploration and production
oil and gas company. In 2009, Aspen disposed of its oil and natural gas producing assets and as a result was no longer engaged in active business operations.
On June 24, 2010, Aspen entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization with Dillco Fluid Service, Inc. (“Dillco”) which set forth the terms by
which Dillco became a wholly owned subsidiary of Aspen on July 27, 2010. On December 30, 2010, Aspen changed its name to “Enservco Corporation.”

The Company’s corporate offices are located at 999 18th Street, Suite 1925N, Denver, CO 80202. Our telephone number is (303) 333-3678. Our

website is www.enservco.com.

Going Concern

We do not generate adequate revenue to fund our current operations, and we incurred significant net operating losses during the years ended
December 31, 2019, and 2018, which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We are also in breach of two of our covenants as
well as a failure to pay a loan overadvance that has continued through the date of this report under the 2017 Credit Agreement resulting in our borrowings under
our existing 2017 Credit Agreement of $34.0 million being classified as a current liability. Accordingly, our financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business activities and the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of
business. We are also currently negotiating and working with East West Bank, a California banking corporation (“East West Bank”) in an effort to obtain a waiver
for our breaches of the 2017 Credit Agreement. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our renegotiation of the 2017 Credit Agreement and
our ability to further reduce costs and raise further capital, of which there can be no assurance. Further, there can be no assurance that we will successfully
obtain a waiver from the East West Bank or maintain or increase our cash flows from operations. Given our current financial situation we may be required to
accept terms on the transactions that are onerous to us.

Corporate Structure

The below table provides an overview of the Company ’s current subsidiaries and their activities.

Name
Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC (“ Heat
Waves”)

State of
Formation

Ownership

Business

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Oil and natural gas well services, including logistics and
stimulation.

Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC ("Adler")

Delaware

100% by Enservco

Operations integrated into Heat Waves during 2019.

Dillco Fluid Service, Inc. ("Dillco")

Kansas

100% by Enservco

Operations discontinued during 2018.

Heat Waves Water Management LLC
(“HWWM”)

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Operations discontinued during 2019.

HE Services, LLC (“HES”)

Nevada

100% by Heat Waves

No active business operations. Owns construction
equipment used by Heat Waves.

On October 26, 2018, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Adler Hot Oil Holdings, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests of Adler Hot Oil Service,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Adler”) for a gross aggregate purchase price of $12.5 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments (the
“Transaction”). Certain former members of Adler are also parties to the Agreement. Adler was a provider of frac water heating and hot oiling services, whose
assets consist primarily of vehicles and equipment, with a complementary base of customers in several oil and gas producing basins where the Company
operates.

Overview of Business Operations

Enservco primarily conducts its business operations through its principal operating subsidiary (Heat Waves ), which provides oil field services to the
domestic onshore oil and natural gas industry. These services include frac water heating, hot oiling, pressure testing, acidizing, chemical stimulation, freshwater
and saltwater hauling, well site construction and other general oil field services. The Company currently operates in the following geographic regions:

• Rocky Mountain Region, including eastern Colorado and southern Wyoming (D-J Basin and Niobrara formations), central Wyoming (Powder River and

Green River Basins), northwestern New Mexico (San Juan Basin), and western North Dakota and eastern Montana (Bakken area). The Rocky Mountain
Region operations are deployed from Heat Waves’ operations centers in Killdeer, ND, Williston, ND; Douglas, WY, and, Longmont, CO.

• Eastern USA Region, including the southern region of the Marcellus Shale formation (southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia) and the Utica

Shale formation in eastern Ohio. The Eastern USA Region operations are deployed from Heat Waves’ operations center in Carmichaels, PA.

• Central USA Region, including the Texas panhandle, and northwestern Oklahoma, and the Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas. The Central USA Region

operations are deployed from operations centers in Okarche, OK; and Jourdanton, TX.

Historically, the Company focused its growth strategy on strategic acquisitions of operating companies and expansion of services through capital
investment consisting of the acquisition and fabrication of property and equipment. That strategy also included expanding into new geographical territories as well
as expanding the services it provides. These strategies are exemplified by these activities:

(1)

(2)

From 2014 through 2016, the Company spent approximately $33.7 million for the acquisition and fabrication of additional frac water heating, hot
oiling, and acidizing equipment; and during 2018, acquired Adler Hot Oil Services, LLC, a provider of frac water heating and hot oiling services,
for a gross aggregate purchase price of approximately $12.5 million in order to expand our market share in the Bakken formation, DJ Basin, and
Marcellus/Utica shale formation.

To expand its footprint, in early 2010 Heat Waves began providing services in the Marcellus Shale natural gas field in southwestern
Pennsylvania and West Virginia, and in September 2011 Heat Waves extended its services into the D-J Basin / Niobrara formation and the
Bakken formation through opening new operation centers in southern Wyoming and western North Dakota, respectively. In late 2012 the
Company expanded its operations, through its Pennsylvania operation center, into the Utica Shale formation in eastern Ohio. Also, in early 2015
the Company expanded its operations into the Eagle Ford formation through opening a new operations center in southern Texas. In early 2019,
the Company expanded operations in the Powder River Basin by opening a new operations center in Douglas, Wyoming.

(3)

In January 2016, Enservco acquired various water transfer assets for approximately $4.3 million in order to provide water transfer services to its
customers in all of its operating areas. This segment was discontinued in 2019.

Operating Entities

As noted above, E nservco conducts its business operations and holds assets primarily through its subsidiary entity, Heat Waves. The following

describes the operations and assets of Enservco’s operating subsidiaries.

Heat Waves. Heat Waves provides a range of well stimulation/maintenance services to a diverse group of independent and major oil and natural gas

companies. The primary services provided are intended to:

(1)

(2)

Assist in the fracturing of formations for newly drilled oil and natural gas wells; and

Help maintain and enhance the production of existing well s throughout their productive life.

These services consist of frac water heating, hot oiling and acidizing. Heat Waves also provides some water hauling and well site construction services.
Heat Waves’ operations are currently in the major oil and natural gas areas in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, West
Virginia, and Wyoming.

Areas of Operations

The following map shows the areas in which the Company currently operates.

Business Segments

Enservco, through its operating subsidiaries, provides a range of services to owners and operators of oil and natural gas wells in the following business

segments. In 2019 we reorganized our business segments to align with how management evaluates the business.

Production Services

The Company's production services consist of acidizing, hot oiling services, and pressure testing. Operations are currently in Colorado, Wyoming, North

Dakota, Montana, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Texas, and Oklahoma. Production services accounted for approximatel y 34% of the Company’s total
revenues for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Acidizing - Acidizing entails pumping large volumes of specially formulated acids and/or chemicals into a well to dissolve materials blocking the flow of

the crude oil or natural gas. The acid is pumped into the well under pressure. Acidizing is most often used to increase permeability throughout the formation,
clean up formation damage near the wellbore caused by drilling, and to remove buildup of materials restricting the flow of crude oil and gas through perforations
in the well casing. For most customers, Heat Waves supplies the acid solution and also pumps that solution into a given well. As of December 31, 2019, Heat
Waves owned and operated a fleet of 7 acidizing units, each of which consist of a specially designed acid pump truck and an acid transport trailer.

Hot Oil Services – Hot oil services involve the circulation of a heated fluid, typically oil, to dissolve, melt, or dislodge paraffin or other hydrocarbon
deposits from the tubing of a producing well. Paraffin deposits build up over time from normal production operations, although the rate at which this paraffin
builds up depends on the chemical character of the crude oil or natural gas being produced. These services are performed by circulating and heating oil from a
well through a hot oil truck and then pumping it down the casing and back up the tubing to remove the deposits. As of December 31, 2019, Heat Waves owned
and operated a fleet of 70 Hot Oiling units. Based on customer needs and seasonal conditions, these vehicles are deployed among the service regions
as necessary in seeking to maximize their productive time.

Hot oil servicing also includes the heating of oil storage tanks. The heating of storage tanks is performed (i) to eliminate frozen water and other soluble

waste in the tanks; and (ii) because heated oil flows more efficiently from the tanks to transports hauling oil to the refineries in colder weather.

Pressure Testing – Pressure testing consists of pumping fluids into new or existing wells or other components of the well system such as

flow lines to detect leaks. Hot oil trucks and pressure trucks are used to perform this service.

Completion Services

The Company's completion services consist of frac water heating and other services. O perations are currently in Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico, North

Dakota, Montana, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Oklahoma. Completion services accounted for approximately 66% of the Company’s total revenues
for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Frac Water Heating – Frac Water Heating is the process of heating water used in connection with the fracturing process of completing a well. Fracturing
services are intended to enhance the production from crude oil and natural gas wells through the creation of conductive flowpaths to enable the hydrocarbons to
reach the wellbore where the natural flow has been restricted by underground formations. The fracturing process consists of pumping a fluid slurry, which largely
consists of fresh water and a proppant into a well at sufficient pressure to fracture (i.e. create conductive flowpaths) the formation. To ensure these solutions are
properly mixed and can flow freely, during certain parts of the year the water frequently needs to be heated to a sufficient temperature as determined by the well
owner/operator. As of December 31, 2019, Heat Waves and Adler owned and operated a fleet of 79 frac heaters designed to heat large amounts of water.

Ownership of Company Assets

The Company owns various equipment and other assets to provide its services and products. Substantially all of the equipment and personal property

assets owned by these entities are pledged as security under the Company's 2017 Credit Agreement with its bank lender.

Historically, as supply and demand require , the Company has leased additional trucks and equipment from time to time. These leases are generally for
periods of less than one year, and therefore are treated as operating leases for accounting purposes, and the rent expense associated with these leases is
reported in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 842 - Leases.

Competitive Business Conditions

We face intense competition in our operations. Competition is influenced by factors such as price, capacity, the quality/safety-record/availability of
equipment and work crews, and the reputation and experience of the service provider. The Company believes that an important competitive factor in establishing
and maintaining long-term customer relationships is having an experienced, skilled, and well-trained work force that is responsive to our customers’ needs.
Although we believe customers consider all of these factors, price is the primary factor in determining which service provider is awarded work.

The demand for our services fluctuates primarily in relation to the domestic commodity price (or anticipated price) of crude oil a nd natural gas which, in
turn, is largely driven by the domestic and worldwide supply of, and demand for, oil and natural gas, political events, as well as speculation within the financial
markets. Demand and prices are often volatile and difficult to predict and depend on events that are not within our control. Generally, as supply of oil and natural
gas decreases and demand increases, service and maintenance requirements increase as oil and natural gas producers drill new wells and attempt to maximize
the productivity of their existing wells to take advantage of the higher priced environment. Conversely, as the supply of commodities increase and demand and
crude oil and natural gas prices fall, oil and gas producers drill fewer wells and scale back or suspend service and maintenance work and put significant pressure
on well services providers such as us to reduce prices for our services. In the fourth quarter of 2019 and in 2020 to date our customers have cut back significantly
their work orders for our services as well as for the well services of our competitors and required us to reduce our prices in order to obtain or maintain our
business with them. We expect price competition will be fierce for the remainder of 2020.

The Company’s competition primarily consists of small and large regional or local contractors. The Company attempts to differentiate itself from its
competition in large part through its range, availability, and quality of services it has the capability to provide. The Company has invested a significant amount of
capital into purchasing, developing, and maintaining a fleet of trucks and other equipment that are critical to the services it provides. Further, the Company
concentrates on providing services to a diverse group of major and independent oil and natural gas companies in a number of geographical areas.

Dependence on One or a Few Major Customers

The Company serves numerous major and independent oil and natural gas companies that are active in our core areas of ope rations.

As of December 31, 2019, two customers represented more than 10% of the Company's accounts receivable balance at 16% and 11% respectively.

Revenues from one customer represented approximately 11% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The loss of our significant customers could have an adverse effect on the Company ’s business until the equipment is redeployed. Further, the Company
believes that if its customers shift production from any of the geographies in which it operates, the Company could effectively re-deploy its equipment into other
domestic geographic areas but it may require us to incur relocation expenses, which would reduce operating margins.

Seasonality

A significant portion of the Company’s operations is impacted by seasonal factors, particularly with regard to its frac water heating and hot oiling services.
In 2019, approximately 76% of our revenue was earned during the first and fourth fiscal quarters. In regard to frac water heating, because customers rely on
Heat Waves to heat large amounts of water for use in fracturing formations, demand for this service is much greater in the colder months. Similarly, hot oiling
services are in higher demand during the colder months when they are needed for maintenance of existing wells and to heat oil storage tanks.

Acidizing, hot oiling, and p ressure testing are performed throughout the year with revenues generally not impacted by weather to a significant degree.

Raw Materials

The Company purchases a wide variety of raw materials, parts, and components that are made by other manufacturers and suppliers for our use. The
Company is not dependent on any single source of supply for those parts, supplies or materials. However, there are a limited number of vendors for propane and
certain acids and chemicals. The Company uses a limited number of suppliers and service providers available to fabricate and/or construct the trucks and
equipment used in its hot oiling, frac water heating, and acid related services.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements or Labor Contracts

As is the situation with all companies in the frac water heating service business, we rely on certain procedures and pract

ices in performing our services.
In 2016, we were issued our first patent relating to an aspect of the frac water heating process. We have other patent applications pending regarding other
procedures used in our process of heating frac water. Further, Adler has been issued three United States patents and one Canadian patent and has two United
States patents pending related to aspects of the frac water heating process. We are aware that one unrelated company has been awarded four patents related, in
part, to a process for heating of frac water.

Government Regulation

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to a variety of government regulations ranging from environmental to Occupational Safety and Health Act
("OSHA") to the Department of Transportation. Our operations are also subject to stringent federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into
the environment or otherwise relating to health and safety or the protection of the environment. These federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to
protection of the environment, wildlife protection, historic preservation, and health and safety are extensive and changing. The trend in environmental legislation
and regulation is generally toward stricter standards, and we expect that this trend will continue as governmental agencies issue and amend existing regulations.
Failure to comply with these laws and regulations as they currently exist or may be amended in the future may result in the assessment of substantial
administrative, civil and criminal penalties, as well as the issuance of injunctions limiting or prohibiting activities. Adherence with these regulatory requirements
increases our cost of doing business and consequently affects our profitability. The Company does not believe that it is in material violation of any regulations
that would have a significant negative impact on the Company’s operations.

Through the routine course of providing services, the Company handles and stores bulk quantities of hazardous materials. If leaks or spills of hazardous
materials handled, transported or stored by us occur, the Company may be responsible under applicable environmental laws for costs of remediating any
damage to the surface or sub-surface (including aquifers).

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabilit y Act (“CERCLA”), also known as “Superfund,” and comparable state statutes
impose strict, joint and several liability on owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of “hazardous substances”
found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring cleanup actions, demands for reimbursement for government-incurred cleanup
costs, or natural resource damages, or for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused
by hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, and comparable state statutes
govern the disposal of “solid waste” and “hazardous waste” and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as
requirements for corrective actions. Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of “hazardous substance,” state laws affecting our
operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum-related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil field wastes as
“non-hazardous,” such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent
handling and disposal requirements. CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found
on drilling and production sites long after operations on such sites have been completed. Other statutes relating to the storage and handling of pollutants include
the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, which requires certain owners and operators of facilities that store or otherwise handle oil to prepare and implement spill
response plans relating to the potential discharge of oil into surface waters. The OPA contains numerous requirements relating to prevention of, reporting of, and
response to oil spills into waters of the United States. State laws mandate oil cleanup programs with respect to contaminated soil. A failure to comply with OPA’s
requirements or inadequate cooperation during a spill response action may subject a responsible party to civil or criminal enforcement actions.

In the course of the Company’s operations, it does not typically generate materials that are considered “hazardous substances.” One exception,
however, would be spills that occur prior to well treatment materials being circulated down hole. For example, if the Company spills acid on a roadway as a result
of a vehicle accident in the course of providing production/stimulation services, or if a tank with acid leaks prior to down hole circulation, the spilled material may
be considered a “hazardous substance.” In this respect, the Company may occasionally be considered to “generate” materials that are regulated as hazardous
substances and, as a result, may incur CERCLA liability for cleanup costs. Also, claims may be filed for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by
the release of hazardous substances or other pollutants.

The Clean Water Act (the “CWA”), and comparable state statutes, impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants, including spills and
leaks of oil and other substances, into waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the
terms of a permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) or an analogous state agency. The CWA regulates storm water run-off from oil and
natural gas facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit for certain activities. Such a permit requires the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm
water run-off from its operations. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other
waters of the United States unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and
administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of oil and other pollutants and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of
cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release.

The Safe Drinking Water Act (the “ SDWA”), and the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the drilling and
operation of subsurface injection wells, such as the disposal wells owned and operated by the Company. The EPA directly administers the UIC program in some
states and in others the responsibility for the program has been delegated to the state. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal
well. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by oil and natural gas drilling, production, and related operations may result in fines,
penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SWDA and state laws. In addition, third party claims may be filed by landowners
and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages, and bodily injury.

Regulations in the states in which the Company owns and operates water injection wells (Okl ahoma) require us to obtain a permit to operate each of our
disposal wells. The applicable regulatory agency may suspend or modify one of our permits if the Company’s well operations are likely to result in pollution of
freshwater, substantial violation of permit conditions or applicable rules, or if the well leaks into the environment.

The Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended the SDWA to exclude hydraulic fracturing from the definition of “ underground injection” under certain
circumstances. However, the repeal of this exclusion has been advocated by certain advocacy organizations and others in the public. The EPA at the request of
Congress conducted a national study examining the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources and issued a final assessment report in
December 2016, which concluded that hydraulic fracturing activities can impact drinking water resources under some circumstances and identifies factors that
influence these impacts.

We incur, and expect to continue to incur, capital and operating costs to comply with t he environmental laws and regulations described herein. The

technical requirements of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly complex, stringent and expensive to implement.

If new federal or state laws or regulations that significantly rest rict hydraulic fracturing are adopted, such legal requirements could result in delays,
eliminate certain drilling and injection activities, make it more difficult or costly for our customers to perform fracturing and increase their and our costs of
compliance and doing business. It is also possible that drilling and injection operations utilizing our services could adversely affect the environment, which could
result in a requirement to perform investigations or clean-ups or in the incurrence of other unexpected material costs or liabilities.

Significant studies and research have been devoted to climate change and global warming, and climate change has developed into a major political issue
in the United States and globally. Certain research suggests that greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change and pose a threat to the environment.
Recent scientific research and political debate has focused in part on carbon dioxide and methane incidental to oil and natural gas exploration and production.
Many state governments have enacted legislation directed at controlling greenhouse gas emissions, and future state and federal legislation and regulation could
impose additional restrictions or requirements in connection with our operations and favor use of alternative energy sources, which could increase operating
costs and decrease demand for oil products. As such, our business could be materially adversely affected by domestic and international legislation targeted at
controlling climate change.

We are also subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including OSHA, and comparable state laws, whose purpose is to protect the
health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the federal
Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act and comparable state statutes require that information be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or
produced in our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens.

Because our trucks travel over public highways to get to customers ’ wells, the Company is subject to the regulations of the Department of
Transportation. These regulations are very comprehensive and cover a wide variety of subjects from the maintenance and operation of vehicles to driver
qualifications to safety. Violations of these regulations can result in penalties ranging from monetary fines to a restriction on the use of the vehicles. Under
regulations effective July 1, 2010, an uncured violation of regulations could result in a shutdown of all of the vehicles of Heat Waves. The Company does not
believe it is in violation of Department of Transportation regulations at this time that would result in a shutdown of vehicles.

Some states and certain municipalities have regulated, or are considering regulating hydraulic fracturing (“ fracking”) which, if accomplished, could impact
certain of our operations. While the Company does not believe that existing regulations and contemplated actions to limit or prohibit fracking have impacted its
activities to date, there can be no assurance that these actions, if taken on a wider scale, may not adversely impact the Company’s business operations and
revenues.

Employees

As of February 28, 2020, the Company employed 186 full time employees. Of these employees, 172 are employed by Heat Waves and 14 are

employed by Enservco. From time to time, the Company may hire contractors to perform work.

Available Information

We maintain a website at http://www.enservco.com. The information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not part of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished
pursuant to the Exchange Act, are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or
furnish those reports to, the SEC.

In addition, we maintain our corporate governance documents on our website, including our:

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees which contains information regarding our whistleblower procedures,

Insider Trading Policy,

Audit Committee Charter,

•

• Compensation Committee Charter,
Trading Blackout Policy, and
•

•

Related Party Transaction Policy.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock may be considered speculative and involves a high degree of risk, including among other items the risk factors
described below. These risk factors are intended to generally describe certain risks that could materially affect the Company and its current business operations
and activities.

You should carefully consider the risks described below and elsewhere herein in connection with any decision whether to acquire, hold or sell the
Company’s securities. The following list identifies and briefly summarizes certain risk but should not be viewed as complete or comprehensive. If any of the
contingencies discussed in the following paragraphs or other materially adverse events actually occur, the business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or a significant part of your
investment.

Liquidity and Debt Risks

Inadequate liquidity could materially and adversely affect our business operations.

We have significant outstanding indebtedness under our credit facility. As of December 31, 2019, we had fully drawn the $34.0 million available under
our credit facility and were in default under our 2017 Credit Agreement with East West Bank. In addition, we experienced significant declines in revenues in the
fourth quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020 compared to the prior year’s comparable quarters and have very limited cash flow. Due to this limited liquidity
and decreased cash flow, we may not be able to provide our services, which could lead to continued deterioration in our financial condition.

On January 6, 2020, the Company received a notice (the “Default Notice”) from East West Bank regarding events of default of the Company with
respect to the 2017 Credit Agreement. As a result of the events of default, East West Bank may accelerate the $34.0 million outstanding loan balance under the
2017 Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable. As of the date of this report, East West Bank has not accelerated the outstanding loan balance
amount but it may do so in the future.

The Default Notice indicates that the Company is in default under the 2017 Credit Agreement as a result of its:

•

failure to immediately repay a loan overadvance that occurred on October 10, 2019 that has continued through January 6, 2020;

failure to maintain a minimum liquidity of not less than $1,500,000 for the months ended October 31, 2019 and November 30, 2019; and

failure to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1:10 to 1:00 for the months ended October 31, 2019 and
November 30, 2019.

The Default Notice indicated that although East West Bank was not as of January 6, 2020, exercising its rights and remedies available as a result of the
events of default, it specifically did not waive its rights and remedies resulting from the events of default and it reserves all other available rights and remedies
under the Credit Agreement, certain other related documents and applicable law.

Our ability to pay interest and principal on our indebtedness and to satisfy our other obligations will depend upon our ability to achieve increased
utilization of our equipment, which is highly influenced by weather and customer's drilling activity. We cannot assure that our business will generate sufficient
cash flows from operations, or that future capital will be available to us in an amount sufficient to fund our liquidity needs. In the absence of adequate cash from
operations and other available capital resources, we could face substantial liquidity constraints. We are seeking additional debt and equity financing without
which we may have to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. If we do not succeed in these endeavors, we may
fail to continue as a going concern. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise capital through debt or equity financings on terms acceptable to us or at
all, or that we could consummate dispositions of assets or operations for fair market value, in a timely manner or at all. Furthermore, any proceeds that we could
realize from any financings or dispositions may not be adequate to meet our debt service or other obligations then due.

We are currently in a very difficult operating environment.

We face a very difficult operating environment in 2020 with exploration and production companies significantly cutting back their drilling and completions
plans and exerting significant pressure on us to reduce our prices for the services we provide. Additionally, as indicated above, we are in default under out 2017
Credit Agreement due to our operating results experienced in the fourth quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020 and we believe we will need additional debt
or equity capital to meet expected cash needs in the second quarter of 2020 and throughout the rest of 2020. We cannot assure that we will raise any such
capital on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Due to our lack of capital we may be forced to curtail operations in some or all of our locations which will materially
and adversely affect our revenues and our ability to continue as a going concern.

We are in violation of two covenants of our 2017 Credit Agreement as well as failure to pay an overadvance that has continued through the
date of this report and the bank has declared events of default and may claim remedies that would effectively put us out of business. Also, we may
be unable to meet the obligations of various financial covenants that are contained in the terms of our 2017 Credit Agreement.

Our 2017 Credit Agreement with East West Bank imposes numerous financial covenants on the Company including maintaining a prescribed fixed
charge coverage ratio, a minimum liquidity ratio at certain times, and it limits the Company's ability to make capital investments. This agreement has a variable
interest rate and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. We are currently in violation of two covenants as
discussed above, as well as failure to pay an overadvance that has continued through the date of this report. Although East West Bank has not as of March 20,
2020, exercised its rights and remedies available as a result of these covenant violations, it specifically did not waive its rights and remedies resulting from the
events of default and it continues to reserve all other available rights and remedies under the Credit Agreement, certain other related documents and applicable
law.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with these covenants, or that if we violate other covenants in the future that East West Bank
would be willing to provide waivers. Violation of these covenants could result in the acceleration of maturities under the default provisions of our 2017 Credit
Agreement and put into jeopardy our ability to operate as a going concern.

Our debt obligations have reduced, and may reduce in the future, our financial and operating flexibility.

As of December 31, 2019, we had borrowed approximately $34.0 million under our senior revolving credit facility and did not have any capacity available
under this facility. Additionally, as of December 31, 2019 we owed approximately $2.8 million to other parties pursuant to various secured and unsecured
subordinate debt agreements.

A high level of indebtedness subjects us to several material adverse risks. In particular, it may make it more likely that a reduction in the borrowing base
of our credit facility following a periodic redetermination could require us to repay a portion of outstanding borrowings, may impair our ability to obtain additional
financing in the future, and increases the risk that we may default on our debt obligations, as is presently occuring. In addition, we are required to devote a
significant portion of our cash flows to servicing our debt, and we are subject to interest rate risk under our credit facility, which bears interest at variable rates. An
increase in our interest rates could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Our ability to meet our debt obligations and to reduce our level of indebtedness depends on our future performance and as of March 2020 we had
experienced two significantly reduced operating quarters (2019 fourth quarter and 2020 first quarter) from the like quarters in the prior years. Thus, we are
extremely limited in our ability to repay any indebtedness without substantial debt restructuring and/or additional financing, either debt or equity, of which we can
make no assurance will occur. Also, because of these poor operating results, we expect that we will need operating capital to meet expected cash needs in the
second quarter of 2020 and throughout the rest of 2020. At this time, we do not have any commitments for such capital. Due to our lack of capital we may be
forced to curtail operations in some or all of our locations which will materially and adversely affect our revenues and our ability to continue as a going concern.

General economic conditions, weather, oil and natural gas prices and financial, business and other factors affect our operations and our future
performance. We experienced a heavy downturn in demand for our services in the fourth quarter of 2019 that has continued through 2020 to date. Many of these
factors are beyond our control. If we do not have sufficient funds on hand to pay our debt when due, we may be required to seek a waiver or amendment from
our lenders, refinance our indebtedness, incur additional indebtedness, sell assets or sell additional shares of our common stock. We may not be able to
complete such transactions on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Our failure to generate sufficient funds to pay our debts or to undertake any of these actions
successfully could result in a default on our debt obligations, which would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our auditors and management have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As disclosed in the consolidated financial statements in this report, we incurred net losses of $7.7 million and $5.9 million for the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Additionally, we are in violation of two of our 2017 Credit Agreement covenants, as well as continually having failed to pay an
overadvance through the date of this report have experienced revenue declines, have very limited liquidity and expect negative cash flow from operations in the
near term, and have suffered recurring losses from operations. We believe these circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on achievement of significantly increased revenues, raising equity or additional debt and/or a
combination transaction with another entity. If we are not able to generate the funds needed to cover our ongoing expenses, then we may be forced to cease
operations or seek bankruptcy protection, in which event our stockholders could lose their entire investment.

Operations Rel ated Risks

While our growth strategy includes seeking acquisitions of other oilfield services companies, we may not be successful in identifying,

making and integrating business or asset acquisitions, if any, in the future.

We anticipate that a component of our growth strategy may be to make geographically focused acquisitions of businesses or assets aimed to strengthen
our presence and expand services offered in selected regional markets. Pursuit of this strategy may be restricted by the on-going volatility and uncertainty within
the credit markets which may significantly limit the availability of funds for such acquisitions. Our ability to use shares of our common stock in an acquisition
transaction may be adversely affected by the volatility in the price of our common stock.

In addition to restricted funding availability, the success of this strategy will depend on our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates and to
negotiate acceptable financial and other terms. There is no assurance that we will be able to do so. The success of an acquisition also depends on our ability to
perform adequate due diligence before the acquisition and on our ability to integrate the acquisition after it is completed. While we intend to commit significant
resources to ensure that we conduct comprehensive due diligence, there can be no assurance that all potential risks and liabilities will be identified in connection
with an acquisition. Similarly, while we expect to commit substantial resources, including management time and effort, to integrating acquired businesses into
ours, there is no assurance that we will be successful in integrating these businesses. In particular, it is important that we be able to retain both key personnel of
the acquired business and its customer base. A loss of either key personnel or customers could negatively impact the future operating results of any acquired
business.

Our business is materially impacted by seasonal weather conditions.

Our businesses, particularly our frac heating and hot oil services, are impacted by weather conditions and temperatures. Unseasonably warm weather
during winter months reduces demand for the heating services and results in higher operating costs, as a percentage of revenue, due to the need to retain
equipment operators during these low demand periods. Management makes concerted efforts to reduce costs during these low demand periods by utilizing
operators in other business segments, reducing hours, and some instances utilizing seasonal layoffs.

Further, during the winter months, our customers may delay operations or we may not be able to operate or mo ve our equipment between locations

during periods of heavy snow, ice or rain, and during the spring some areas impose transportation restrictions due to muddy conditions caused by spring thaws.

We may be unable to implement price increases and recently have had to decrease existing prices on our core services.

We periodically seek to increase the prices of our services to offset rising costs and to generate increased revenues. We operate in a very competitive
industry and, as a result, we are not always successful in raising or maintaining our existing prices. Additionally, during periods of increased market demand, a
significant amount of new equipment may enter the market, which would also put pressure on the pricing of our services. Even when we are able to increase our
prices, we may not be able to do so at a rate that is sufficient to offset rising costs. Also, we may not be able to successfully increase prices without adversely
affecting our activity levels. The inability to maintain our prices or to increase the prices of our services to offset rising costs increase could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations. Recently, in the face of significantly reduced demand for oil field services resulting
from significant reduced capital expenditures, we have been forced to decrease our frac heating prices in order to obtain new business and obtain existing
business, which will result in lower margins for us and decrease operating revenues. We anticipate pricing pressure impacting our other service lines if lower oil
and gas prices persist.

We operate in a capital-intensive industry. We may not be able to finance future growth of our operations or future acquisitions.

Our business activities require substantial capital expenditures. If our cash flow from operating activities and borrowings under our existing credit facility
were not sufficient to fund our capital expenditure budget, we would be required to reduce these expenditures or to fund these expenditures through new debt or
equity issuances.

Our a bility to raise new debt or equity capital or to refinance or restructure our debt at any given time depends, among other things, on the condition of
the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Also, the terms of existing or future debt or equity instruments could further restrict our business
operations. The inability to finance future growth could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Increased labor costs or the unavailability of skilled workers could hurt our operations.

Companies in our industry, including us, are dependent upon the available labor pool of skilled workers. We compete with other oilfield services
businesses and other employers to attract and retain qualified personnel with the technical skills and experience required to provide our customers with the
highest quality service. We are also subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs such matters as minimum wage, overtime and other working
conditions, and which can increase our labor costs or subject us to liabilities to our employees. A shortage of skilled workers or other general inflationary
pressures or changes in applicable laws and regulations could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain skilled personnel and could require us to enhance
our wage and benefits packages. Labor costs may increase in the future or we may not be able to reduce wages when demand and pricing falls, and such
changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Historically, we have experienced a high employee turnover rate. Any difficulty we experience replacing or adding workers could adversely

affect our business.

We believe that the high turnover rate in our industry is attributable to the nature of oilfield services work, which is physically demanding and performed
outdoors, and to the seasonality of certain of our segments. As a result, workers may choose to pursue employment in areas that offer a more desirable work
environment at wage rates that are competitive with ours. The potential inability or lack of desire by workers to commute to our facilities and job sites, as well as
the competition for workers from competitors or other industries, are factors that could negatively affect our ability to attract and retain skilled workers. We may
not be able to recruit, train and retain an adequate number of workers to replace departing workers. The inability to maintain an adequate workforce could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

New U.S. tax legislation could adversely affect us and our shareholders.

On December 22, 2017, legislation referred to as the Tax Act was signed into law. The Tax Act is generally effective for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2017. The Tax Act includes significant amendments to the Internal Revenue Code, including amendments that significantly change the taxation of
business entities, including the deductibility of interest. Some of the amendments could adversely affect our business and financial condition, including by limiting
our ability to realize tax benefits from our NOLs, however we expect that, ultimately, the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% should be
beneficial to us.

Our business depends on domestic (United States) spending by the crude oil and natural gas industry which suffered significant price
volatility in 2019 and 2020, and such volatility may continue; our business has been, and may in the future be, adversely affected by industry and
financial market conditions that are beyond our control.

We depend on our customers’ ability and willingness to make operating and capital expenditures to explore, develop and produce crude oil and natural
gas in the United States. Customers’ expectations for future crude oil and natural gas prices, as well as the availability of capital for operating and capital
expenditures, may cause them to curtail spending, thereby reducing demand for our services and equipment. Major declines in oil and natural gas prices in 2019
and 2020 have resulted in substantial declines in capital spending and drilling programs across the industry. As a result of the declines in oil and natural gas
prices, many exploration and production companies have and are expected to substantially reduce drilling and completions programs at times and have required
service providers to make pricing concessions.

Industry conditions and specifically the market price for crude oil and natural gas are influenced by numerous domestic and global factors over which we
have no control, such as the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, domestic and worldwide economic conditions that are affected by several factors
beyond our control, weather conditions, political instability in oil and natural gas producing countries and perceived economic conditions. The volatility of the oil
and natural gas industry and the consequent impact on commodity prices as well as exploration and production activity could adversely impact the level of drilling
and activity by many of our customers. Where declining prices lead to reduced exploration and development activities in our market areas, the reduction in
exploration and development activities over a sustained period will have a negative long-term impact on our business. Several month periods of low oil and
natural gas prices typically result in increased pressure from our customers to make additional pricing concessions and impact our borrowing arrangements with
our principal bank. There can be no assurance that the prices we charge to our customers will return to former levels experienced.

There has also been significant political pressures for the United States economy to reduce its dependence on crude oil and natural gas due to the
perceived impacts on climate change. Furthermore, there have been significant political and regulatory efforts to reduce or eliminate hydraulic fracturing
operations in certain of our service areas, particularly in Colorado. Colorado legislature recently enacted a bill that could significantly restrict oil and gas drilling in
Colorado, thereby negatively affecting our revenues. These activities may make oil and gas investment and production less attractive.

Higher oil and gas prices do not necessarily result in increased drilling activity because our customers’ expectation of future prices also drives demand
for production maintenance and completion services. Oil and gas prices, as well as demand for our services, also depend upon other factors that are beyond our
control, including the following:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Supply and demand for crude oil and natural gas;
political pressures against crude oil and natural gas exploration and production;
cost of exploring for, producing, and delivering oil and natural gas;
expectations regarding future energy prices;
advancements in exploration and development technology;
adoption or repeal of laws regulating oil and gas production in the U.S.;
imposition or lifting of economic sanctions against foreign companies;
weather conditions;
rate of discovery of new oil and natural gas reserves;
tax policy regarding the oil and gas industry;
development and use of alternative energy sources; and
the ability of oil and gas companies to generate funds or otherwise obtain external capital for projects and production operations.

Ongoing volatility and uncertainty in the domestic and global economic and political environments have caused the oilfield services industry to
experience demand volatility. While our management is generally optimistic for the continuing development of the onshore North American oil and gas industry
over the long term, there are several political and economic pressures negatively impacting the economics of production from existing wells, future drilling
operations, and the willingness of banks and investors to provide capital to participants in the oil and gas industry. We believe that these cuts in spending will
continue to curtail drilling programs as well as discretionary spending on well services, and will continue to result in a reduction in the demand for our services,
the rates we can charge, and equipment utilization. In addition, certain of our customers could become unable to pay their suppliers, including us. Any of these
conditions or events would adversely affect our operating results.

Our success depends on key members of our management, the loss of any executive or key personnel could disrupt our business operations.

We depend to a large extent on the services of certain of our executive officers. The loss of the services of Ian Dickinson or Marjorie Hargrave, could
disrupt our operations. Although we have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Dickinson and Ms. Hargrave, that contain, among other things non-
compete and confidentiality provisions, we may not be able to enforce the non-compete and/or confidentiality provisions in the employment agreements.

We depend on several significant customers, and a loss of one or more significant customers could adversely affect our results of

operations.

Our top five customers accounted for approximately 35% and 39% of our total annual revenues for 2019 and 2018, respectively. The loss of any one of
these customers or a sustained decrease in demand by any of such customers could result in a substantial loss of revenues and could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.

While we believe our equipment could be redeployed in the current market environment if we lost any material customers, such loss could have an
adverse effect on our business until the equipment is redeployed. We believe that the market for our services is sufficiently diversified that it is not dependent on
any single customer or a few major customers.

Demand for the majority of our services is substantially dependent on the levels of expenditures by the domestic oil and natural gas industry.
We have no influence over our customers’ capital expenditures. On-going economic volatility could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Over the last several years, oil prices have experienced significant swings. Prices for crude oil and natural gas decreased significantly in 2019 and 2020,
to date, compared to prior years. Significant and sustained price declines have historically caused many of our customers to reduce or delay their oil and natural
gas exploration and production spending, which consequently resulted in decreased demand for our services, and exerted downward pressure on the prices we
charged for our services and products.

Also, an environment of increasing oil and natural gas prices can lead to increasing costs of exploring for and producing oil and natural gas. Though the
addition of frac stimulation into the domestic oil and gas industry has somewhat reduced the overall costs of producing oil and natural gas, the price of drill rigs,
pipe, other equipment, fluids, and oil field services and the cost to companies like us of providing those services, has generally increased along with increases in
oil and natural gas prices. The reduction in cash flows experienced by our customers during periods of lower oil and natural gas prices and the increase of the
costs of exploring for and producing oil and natural gas as noted above could have significant adverse effects on the financial condition of some of our
customers. This could result in project modifications, delays or cancellations, general business disruptions, and delay in, or nonpayment of, amounts that are
owed to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities could reduce our earnings and cash available for operations.

We are subject to increasingly stringent laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and the importation and use of hazardous materials,
including laws and regulations governing air emissions, water discharges and waste management. Government authorities have the power to enforce
compliance with their regulations, and violations are subject to fines, injunctions or both. We incur, and expect to continue to incur, capital and operating costs to
comply with environmental laws and regulations. The technical requirements of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly complex, stringent and
expensive to implement. These laws may provide for “strict liability” for damages to natural resources or threats to public health and safety. Strict liability can
render a party liable for damages without regard to negligence or fault on the part of the party. Some environmental laws provide for joint and several strict
liability for remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances.

We use hazardous substances and transport hazardous wastes in our operations. Accordingly, we could become subject to potentially material liabilities
relating to the investigation and cleanup of contaminated properties, and to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as the result of exposures to, or
releases of, hazardous substances. In addition, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, new laws and regulations, the discovery of previously
unknown contamination or the imposition of new or increased requirements could require us to incur costs and penalties, or become the basis of new or
increased liabilities that could reduce its earnings and cash available for operations. We believe we are currently in compliance with environmental laws and
regulations.

Intense competition within the well services industry may adversely affect our ability to market our services.

The well services industry is intensely competitive. It includes numerous small companies capable of competing effectively in our markets on a local
basis, as well as several large companies that possess substantially greater financial and other resources than us. Our larger competitors have greater resources
that allow those competitors to compete more effectively than us. Our small competitors may be able to react to market conditions more quickly. The amount of
equipment available may exceed demand at some point in time, which could result in active price competition.

We could be impacted by unfavorable results of legal proceedings, such as being found to have infringed on intellectual property rights.

As is the situation with other companies in the frac water heating service business, we rely on certain procedures and practices in performing our
services. In 2016, we were issued our first patent relating to an aspect of the frac water heating process and in 2017, a second patent was issued. We have other
patent applications pending regarding other procedures used in our process of heating frac water. We are aware that one unrelated company has been awarded
four patents related, in part, to a process for heating of frac water.

Our operations are subject to inherent risks, some of which are beyond our control. These risks may be self-insured, or may not be fully

covered under our insurance policies, but to the extent not covered, are self-insured by us.

Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the oil and natural gas industry, such as, but not limited to, accidents, blowouts, explosions, fires and

oil spills. These conditions can cause:

■ Personal injury or loss of life,
■ Damage to or destruction of property, equipment and the environment, and
■ Suspension of operations by our customers.

The occurrence of a significant event or adverse claim in excess of the insurance coverage that we maintain or that is not covered by insurance could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, claims for loss of oil and natural gas production and damage to
formations can occur in the well services industry. Litigation arising from a catastrophic occurrence at a location where our equipment and services are being
used may result in us being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting large claims.

We maintain insurance coverage that we believe to be customary in the industry against these hazards. In addition, in June 2015, we became self-
insured under our Employee Group Medical Plan for the first $50,000 per individual participant. However, we do not have insurance against all foreseeable risks,
either because insurance is not available or because of the high premium costs. The occurrence of an event not fully insured against, or the failure of an insurer
to meet its insurance obligations, could result in substantial losses to us. In addition, we may not be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at
reasonable rates. Insurance may not be available to cover any or all of the risks to which we are subject, or, even if available, it may be inadequate, or insurance
premiums or other costs could rise significantly in the future so as to make such insurance prohibitively expensive. It is likely that, in our insurance renewals, our
premiums and deductibles will be higher, and certain insurance coverage either will be unavailable or considerably more expensive than it has been in the
recent past. In addition, our insurance is subject to coverage limits, and some policies exclude coverage for damages resulting from environmental contamination.

Compliance with climate change legislation or initiatives could negatively impact our business.

The U.S. Congress has considered legislation to mandate reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and certain states have already implemented, or
may be in the process of implementing, similar legislation. Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court has held in its decisions that carbon dioxide can be regulated as
an “air pollutant” under the Clean Air Act, which could result in future regulations even if the U.S. Congress does not adopt new legislation regarding emissions.
At this time, it is not possible to predict how legislation or new federal or state government mandates regarding the emission of greenhouse gases could impact
our business; however, any such future laws or regulations could require us or our customers to devote potentially material amounts of capital or other
resources in order to comply with such regulations. These expenditures could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.

Anti-fracking initiatives and revisions of applicable state regulations could adversely impact our business.

Some states (including Colorado) and certain municipalities have regulated, or are considering regulating fracking which, if accomplished, could impact
certain of our operations. There can be no assurance that these actions, if taken on a wider scale, may not adversely impact our business operations and
revenues.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards may be subject to limitation and may result in increased future tax liability.

Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, contain rules that limit the ability of a corporation that undergoes
an “ownership change” to utilize its net operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”) and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. An
“ownership change” is generally defined as any change in ownership of more than 50% of a corporation’s stock over a rolling three-year period by stockholders
that own (directly or indirectly) 5% or more of the stock of the corporation, or arising from a new issuance of stock by the corporation. If an ownership change
occurs, Section 382 generally imposes an annual limitation on the use of pre-ownership change net operating losses, or NOLs, credits and certain other tax
attributes to offset taxable income earned after the ownership change. The annual limitation is equal to the product of the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate
and the value of the corporation’s stock immediately before the ownership change. This annual limitation may be adjusted to reflect any unused annual limitation
for prior years and certain recognized built-in gains for the year. In addition, Section 383 generally limits the amount of tax liability in any post-ownership change
year that can be reduced by pre-ownership change tax credit carryforwards. If we were to experience an "ownership change," this could result in increased U.S.
federal income tax liability for us if we generate taxable income after the ownership change. Limitations on the use of NOLs and other tax attributes could also
increase our state tax liabilities. The use of our tax attributes will also be limited to the extent that we do not generate positive taxable income in future tax
periods. As a result of these limitations, we may be unable to offset future taxable income, if any, with NOLs before such NOLs expire. Accordingly, these
limitations may increase our federal and state income tax liabilities.

As of December 31, 2019, we had U.S. federal NOLs of approximately $31.8 million and state NOLs of approximately $27.5 million.

While our growth strategy includes seeking acquisitions of other oilfield services companies, we may not be successful in identifying,

making and integrating business or asset acquisitions, if any, in the future.

At this time, we are very limited in considering potential acquisitions due to our deteriorating financial condition and immediate liquidity need. We
anticipate that a component of any future growth strategy may be to make geographically focused acquisitions of businesses or assets aimed to strengthen our
presence and expand services offered in selected regional markets. Pursuit of this strategy may be restricted by the on-going volatility and uncertainty within the
credit markets which may significantly limit the availability of any funds for such acquisitions. Our ability to use shares of our common stock in an acquisition
transaction may be adversely affected by the volatility in our stock price.

In addition to restricted funding availability, the success of this strategy will depend on our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates and to
negotiate acceptable financial and other terms. There is no assurance that we will be able to do so. The success of an acquisition also depends on our ability to
perform adequate due diligence before the acquisition and on our ability to integrate the acquisition after it is completed. While the Company intends to commit
significant resources to ensure that it conducts comprehensive due diligence, there can be no assurance that all potential risks and liabilities will be identified in
connection with an acquisition. Similarly, while we expect to commit substantial resources, including management time and effort, to integrating acquired
businesses into ours, there is no assurance that we will be successful in integrating these businesses. In particular, it is important that the Company be able to
retain both key personnel of an acquired business and its customer base. A loss of either key personnel or customers could negatively impact the future
operating results of any acquired business.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

We have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Stockholders may not receive funds without selling their

shares.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to
pay down debt and finance the expansion of our business. Our future dividend policy is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon
various factors, including our business, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and investment opportunities. In addition, we have agreed
with East West Bank, our principal lender that we will not pay any cash dividends on our common stock until our obligations to East West Bank are paid in full.
Accordingly, realization of a gain on a shareholder’s investment will depend on the appreciation of the price of our common stock.

Our board of directors can, without stockholder approval, cause preferred stock to be issued on terms that adversely affect holders of our

common stock.

Under our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which none are issued
and outstanding as of the date of this annual report. Also, our board of directors, without stockholder approval, may determine the price, rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares. If our board of directors causes shares of preferred stock to be issued, the rights of the holders
of our common stock would likely be subordinate to those of preferred holders and therefore could be adversely affected. Our board of directors’ ability to
determine the terms of preferred stock and to cause its issuance, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate
purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding common stock. Preferred shares issued by our
board of directors could include voting rights or super voting rights, which could shift the ability to control the Company to the holders of the preferred stock.
Preferred stock could also have conversion rights into shares of our common stock at a discount to the market price of our common stock, which could negatively
affect the market for our common stock. In addition, preferred stock would have preference in the event of liquidation of the corporation, which means that the
holders of preferred stock would be entitled to receive the net assets of the corporation distributed in liquidation before the holders of our common stock receive
any distribution of the liquidated assets.

The price of our common stock may be volatile regardless of our operating performan ce, and you may not be able to resell shares of our

common stock at or above the price you paid or at all.

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price at which you paid for such
shares. Our stock price volatility can be in response to a number of factors, including those listed in this section and elsewhere in this annual report. Many of
these volatility factors are beyond our control. Other factors that may affect the market price of our common stock include:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations;
liquidity;
sales of our common stock by our stockholders;
changes in oil and natural gas prices;
changes in our cash flow from operations or earnings estimates;
publication of research reports about us or the oil and natural gas exploration, production and service industry generally;
competition from other oil and gas service companies and for, among other things, capital and skilled personnel;
increases in market interest rates which may increase our cost of capital;
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings, and enforcement and legal actions;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur in the future;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
actions by our stockholders;
commencement of or involvement in litigation;
news reports relating to trends, concerns, technological or competitive developments, regulatory changes, and other related issues in our industry;
speculation in the press or investment community regarding our business;
political conditions in oil and natural gas producing regions;
general market and economic conditions; and
domestic and international economic, legal, and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance.

In addition, the U.S. securities markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations over the past several years. These fluctuations often
have been unrelated to the operating performance of companies in these markets. Market fluctuations and broad market, economic and industry factors may
negatively affect the price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Any volatility or a significant decrease in the market price of our
common stock could also negatively affect our ability to make acquisitions using our common stock. Further, if we were to be the object of securities class action
litigation as a result of volatility in our common stock price or for other reasons, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention
and resources, which could negatively affect our financial results.

Our existing shareholders would experience dilution if we elect to raise equity capital to meet our liquidity needs or finance a strategic

transaction.

As part of our strategy we may desire to raise c apital and or utilize our common stock to effect strategic business transactions. Either such action will
likely require that we issue equity (or debt) securities which would result in dilution to our existing stockholders. Although we will attempt to minimize the dilutive
impact of any future capital-raising activities or business transactions, we cannot offer any assurance that we will be able to do so. If we are successful in raising
additional working capital, we may have to issue additional shares of our common stock at prices at a discount from the then-current market price of our common
stock.

The value of our common stock may decline significantly if we are unable to maintain our NYSE American listing.

Our common stock has sold and may continue to sell at a price per share well below $1.00. The NYSE American rules contain requirements with respect
to continued listing standards, which include, among other things, when it appears to the Board of Directors of the Exchange that “the extent of public distribution
or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make further dealings on the Exchange inadvisable” (Rule 1002). Rule 1003 also
provides that the Exchange will not normally consider removing shares from listing where, like Enservco at the present time, “the issuer has at least 1,100,000
shares publicly held, a market value of publicly held shares of at least $15,000,000 and 400 round lot shareholders”.

On November 12, 2019 we received notification from the NYSE American LLC (the “NYSE American”) indicating that the Company is not in compliance
with Sections 1003(a)(i) and (ii) of the NYSE’s Company Guide in that it has reported stockholders’ equity of less than $2 million as of December 31, 2019, and
reported losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in its four most recent fiscal years.

The NYSE American has approved the Company’s plan to regain compliance with the NYSE’s continued listing standard related to stockholders’ equity.
Accordingly, Enservco’s common stock will continue to be listed on the NYSE American pursuant to an extension while it seeks to regain compliance with the
listing standards noted, subject to the Company’s compliance with other continued listing requirements.

If we fail to meet the requirements, our common stock may be delisted. If our common stock is delisted, we would be forced to list our common stock on
the OTC Markets or some other quotation medium, depending on our ability to meet the specific requirements of those quotation systems. In that case, we may
lose some or all of our institutional investors, and selling our common stock on the OTC Markets would be more difficult because smaller quantities of shares
would likely be bought and sold and transactions could be delayed. These factors could result in lower prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices for
shares of our common stock. Further, because of the additional regulatory burdens imposed upon broker-dealers with respect to de-listed companies, delisting
could discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our stock, further limiting the liquidity of our shares. These factors could have a material adverse
effect on the trading price, liquidity, value and marketability of our stock.

General Corporate Risks

Concentration of ownership makes it unlikely that any stockholder will be able to influence t he election of directors or engage in a change of

control transaction.

Five stockholders directly and indirectly own approximately 38% of the Company ’s outstanding common stock and have the ability to heavily influence
the election of our directors when they again stand for reelection. Furthermore, it is likely that no person seeking control of the Company through stock ownership
will be able to succeed in doing so without negotiating an arrangement to do so with these stockholders. For so long as these stockholders continue to own a
significant percentage of the outstanding shares of the Company common stock, they will retain such influence over the election of the board of directors and the
negotiation of any change of control transaction.

Provisions in our charter documents could prevent or delay a change in control or a takeover.

Provisions in our bylaws provide certain requirements for the nomination of directors which preclude a stockholder from nominating a candidate to stand
for election at any annual meeting. As described in Section 2.12 of the Company’s bylaws, nominations must be presented to the Company well in advance of a
scheduled annual meeting, and the notification must include specific information as set forth in that section. The Company believes that such a provision
provides reasonable notice of the nominees to the board of directors, but it may preclude stockholder nomination at a meeting where the stockholder is not
familiar with nomination procedures and, therefore, may prevent or delay a change of control or takeover.

Although the Delaware General Corporation Law includes § 112 which provides that bylaws of Delaware corporations may require the corporation to
include in its proxy materials one or more nominees submitted by stockholders in addition to individuals nominated by the board of directors, the bylaws of the
Company do not so provide. As a result, if any stockholder desires to nominate persons for election to the board of directors, the proponent will have to incur all
of the costs normally associated with a proxy contest.

Indemnification of officers and directors may result in unanticipated expenses.

The Delaware General Corporation Law, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws, and i ndemnification agreements between
the Company and certain individuals provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain circumstances, against
attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with us or activities on our
behalf. We also will bear the expenses of such litigation for any of our directors, officers, employees, or agents, upon such person’s promise to repay them if it is
ultimately determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by
us that we may be unable to recoup and could direct funds away from our business and products (if any).

We have significant obligations under the 1934 Act and the NYSE American.

Because we are a public company filing reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are subject to increased regulatory scrutiny and
extensive and complex regulation. The Securities and Exchange Commission has the right to review the accuracy and completeness of our reports, press
releases, and other public documents. In addition, we are subject to extensive requirements to institute and maintain financial accounting controls and for the
accuracy and completeness of our books and records. In addition to regulation by the SEC, we are subject to the NYSE American rules. The NYSE
American rules contain requirements with respect to corporate governance, communications with shareholders, and various other matters.

Our operations are subject to cyber-attacks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations and

consolidated financial condition.

Our operations are increasingly dependent on digital technologies and services. We use these technologies for internal purposes, including data storage,
processing and transmissions, as well as in our interactions with customers and suppliers. Digital technologies are subject to the risk of cyber-attacks. If our
systems for protecting against cybersecurity risks prove not to be sufficient, we could be adversely affected by, among other things: loss of or damage to
intellectual property, proprietary or confidential information, or customer, supplier, or employee data; interruption of our business operations; and increased costs
required to prevent, respond to, or mitigate cybersecurity attacks. These risks could harm our reputation and our relationships with customers, suppliers,
employees and other third parties, and may result in claims against us. These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of
operations and consolidated financial condition.

Information about our Executive Officers

The following table sets forth, as of March 15, 2020, certain information regarding the executive officers of Enservco:

Name
Ian Dickinson
Marjorie Hargrave

Age
47
56

Position
Chief Executive Officer & President
Chief Financial Officer

The following biographies describe the business experience of our executive officers:

Ian E. Dickinson, Age 47. Mr. Dickinson became our Chief Executive Officer and President on May 9, 2019 and was also appointed to the Company’s
Board of Directors on May 9, 2017. Mr. Dickinson joined the Company from Caddis Capital Investments, LLC (“Caddis”), an actively managed private equity firm,
where he had been a partner since July, 2016. Prior to joining Caddis, Mr. Dickinson served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Premier Oilfield
Equipment Company (“Premier”) from its acquisition by Altira Group, LLC in February, 2012, until July, 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Dickinson served as Senior Vice
President of Finance at Startek, Inc. (“SRT”), a global contact center outsource services provider, from March 2011 until February, 2012, and as Managing
Director at Slalom Consulting, LLC, leading the CFO Advisory Services practice from October, 2009 until March, 2011. His previous experience includes CFO
and corporate development roles at several private equity and venture capital backed companies. Mr. Dickinson began his career in various and expanding
leadership roles in finance and M&A at Quest Communications (acquired by CenturyLink), Nextel (acquired by Sprint), and ADT Security Services. Mr. Dickinson
is a member of Young President Organization – Colorado Chapter, and currently serves on the Board of Directors of Fox Management, LLC and the ACE
Scholarships Advisory Board. Mr. Dickinson is a graduate of Fort Lewis College in Durango, Colorado.

Marjorie Hargrave, Age 56. Ms. Hargrave became our Chief Financial Officer on July 24, 2019. Ms. Hargrave previously provided consulting services to
various companies in the areas of finance, administration, accounting, risk mitigation, human resources, and investor relations from 2016 to joining us in 2019.
Prior to her consulting work, Ms. Hargrave served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Strategic Planning for CTAP, LLC, a privately held
distributor of tubing and casing throughout the United States, from 2010 to 2016. Ms. Hargrave also served as Chief Financial Officer of High Sierra Energy, LP,
a start-up energy company which focused on midstream acquisitions, from 2005 to 2009. Ms. Hargrave’s previous experience also includes management and
associate roles with Black Hills Corporation, Xcel Energy, and Merrill Lynch & Co. Ms. Hargrave earned a bachelor’s degree in economics from Boston
University, and a master’s degree in economics from New York University.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth real property owned and lease d by the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019. Unless otherwise indicated,

the properties are used in Heat Waves’ operations.

Owned Properties:
Location/Description
Killdeer, ND(1)
• Shop
• Land – shop
• Housing
• Land – housing

Tioga, ND(2)
• Shop
• Land

Approximate Size

10,000 sq. ft.
8 acres
5,000 sq. ft.
2 acres

4,000 sq. ft.
6 acres

(1) Property is collateral for mortgage debt obligation.
(2) Location not currently used in operations.

Leased Properties:

Location/Description

Approximate Size

Base Rent

Lease Expiration

Longmont, CO
• Shop
• Land

Douglas, WY

• Shop
• Land

Carmichaels, PA
• Shop
• Land

Jourdanton, TX
• Shop
• Land

Bryan, TX(3)
• Shop
• Land

Okarche, OK
• Shop
• Land

Carrizo Springs, TX

• Land

Denver, CO (4)

• Corporate offices

Denver, CO

• Corporate offices

18,400 sq. ft.
5 acres

6,000 sq. ft.
5 acres

5,000 sq. ft.
12.1 acres

5,850 sq. ft.
2.3 acres

6,000 sq. ft.
1.6 acres

5,000 sq. ft.
2 acres

2.6 acres

7,352 sq. ft.

4,021 sq. ft.

$25,300

June 2026

$7,000

December 2021

$7,500

April 2022

$8,150

June 2024

$5,345

August 2022

$6,000

October 2020

$2,500

September 2021

$15,976

June 2022

$7,854

April 2024

(3) Company is receiving $5,500 in monthly minimum rent under a sublease agreement for this leased property.
(4) Company is receiving approximately $10,900 in monthly minimum rent under a sublease agreement for this leased property.

Note - All leases have renewal clauses

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Enservco and Heat Waves were defendants in a civil lawsuit in federal court in Colorado, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00983-RBJ (“Colorado Case”), that
alleged that Enservco and Heat Waves, in offering and selling frac water heating services, infringed and induced others to infringe two patents owned by Heat-
On-The-Fly, LLC (“HOTF”)- i.e., the ‘993 Patent and the ‘875 Patent. In March of 2019, the parties moved to dismiss the Colorado Case. On March 15, 2019,
the Colorado Case was dismissed in its entirety without any finding of liability of Enservco or Heat Waves.

HOTF dismissed its claims with regard to the ‘993 Patent with prejudice and its claims with regard to the ‘875 Patent without prejudice. However, HOTF
agreed not to sue Enservco or Heat Waves in the future for infringement of the ‘875 Patent based on the same type of frac water heating services offered by
Heat Waves prior to and through March 13, 2019. Heat Waves dismissed its counterclaims against HOTF without prejudice in order to preserve its defenses.

While the Colorado Case was pending, HOTF was issued two additional patents, which were related to the ‘993 and ‘875 Patents, but were not part of
the Colorado Case. However, in March of 2015, a North Dakota federal court determined in an unrelated lawsuit (not involving Enservco or Heat Waves) that
the ‘993 Patent was invalid. The same court also found that the ‘993 Patent was unenforceable due to inequitable conduct by the patent owner and/or the
inventor. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals later confirmed, among other things, the North Dakota court’s findings of inequitable conduct. In light of the
foregoing, Management believes that final findings of invalidity and/or unenforceability of the ‘993 Patent based on inequitable conduct could serve as a basis to
affect the validity and/or enforceability of these additional HOTF patents.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE American under the symbol “ ENSV”. The table below sets forth the high and low daily closing sales prices of
the Company’s Common Stock during the periods indicated as reported by the New York Stock Exchange for each of the quarters in the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

2019

Price Range

2018

Price Range

High

Low

High

Low

0.62 $
0.72
0.50
0.26

0.36 $
0.37
0.21
0.14

1.06 $
1.47
1.23
0.80

0.63
0.86
0.65
0.34

The closing sales price of the Company ’s common stock as reported on March 16, 2020, was $0.10 per share.

Holders

As of March 16, 2020, there were 451 holders of record of Company common stock. This does not include an indeterminate number of persons who

hold our Common Stock in brokerage accounts and otherwise in “street name”.

Dividends

Holders of common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company did not declare

or pay dividends during its fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018, and has no plans at present to declare or pay any dividends.

Decisions concerning dividend payments in the future will depend on income and cash requirements. However, in its agreements with East West Bank,
our principal lender, the Company represented that it would not pay any cash dividends on its common stock until its obligations to East West Bank are satisfied.
Furthermore, to the extent the Company has any earnings, it will likely retain earnings to pay down debt, or expand corporate operations and not use such
earnings to pay dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following is provided with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities are

authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2019:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category
and Description

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,

Warrants, and Rights
(a)

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants, and Rights
(b)

Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance

Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(a))
(c)

1,945,333(1) $

655,000(2)

2,600,333

0.55

0.22

0.47

6,914,711(3)

6,914,711

Total

(1)

(2)

(3)

Represents (i) 1,470,667 unexercised options outstanding under the Company ’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, and (ii) 474,666 unexercised
options under the Company’s frozen 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (see below for further information).

Consists of (i) 30,000 warrants issued in June 2016 to the principals of the Company’s existing investor relations firm to acquire 30,000 shares
of Company common stock exercisable at $0.70 per share and (ii) 625,000 warrants issued to Cross River Partners, L.P. in connection with
an Amended and Restated Subordinated Loan Agreement discussed in more detail in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements
included in "Item 8. Financial Statements" of this report.

Calculated as 10,391,711 shares of common stock reserved for the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan less 1,470,667 options outstanding or
exercised under the 2016 Plan and 2,006,333 of Restricted Stock Award shares outstanding under the 2016 Plan. No additional stock option
grants will be granted under the 2010 Plan as summarized below.

Description of the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan:

On July 27, 2010, the Company ’s Board of Directors adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan permitted the granting of
equity-based awards to our directors, officers, employees, consultants, independent contractors and affiliates. The 2010 Plan was approved by the Company’s
stockholders in October 2010 and permitted the issuance of options that qualify as Incentive Stock Options pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

As discussed below, the 2010 Plan has been replaced by a new stock option plan and no additional stock o ption grants will be granted under the 2010
Plan. However, as of December 31, 2019, there were options to purchase 474,666 shares which remain outstanding under the 2010 Plan that were awarded
prior to the adoption of the 2016 Plan described below.

Description of the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan:

On July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the adoption of the Enservco Corporation 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “ 2016 Plan”),
which was approved by the stockholders on September 29, 2016. The 2016 Plan is administered by our Board of Directors, which may in turn delegate authority
to administer the 2016 Plan to a committee. Our plan administrator may make grants of cash and equity awards under the 2016 Plan to facilitate compliance with
Section 162(m) of the Code. Subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan, the plan administrator may determine the recipients, numbers and types of awards to be
granted, and the terms and conditions of the awards, including the period of their exercisability and vesting. On November 29, 2017, the Board of Directors
established a compensation committee that will administer the 2016 Plan.

The aggregate number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan will not exceed 10,391,711 shares through
September 29, 2026 (the stated life of the 2016 plan). As of December 31, 2019, there were options to purchase 1,470,667 shares outstanding, 926,666 options
had been exercised pursuant to the 2016 Plan, and 2,006,333 Restricted Stock Award shares outstanding under the 2016 Plan.

The 2016 Plan permits the granting of:

•
•
•
•
•
•

Stock options (including both incentive and non-qualified stock options);
Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”);
Restricted stock and restricted stock units;
Performance awards of cash, stock, other securities or property;
Other stock grants; and
Other stock-based awards.

Unless sooner discontinued or terminated by the Board, the 2016 Plan will expire on September 29, 2026. No awards may be made after that date.
However, unless otherwise expressly provided in an applicable award agreement, any award granted under the 2016 Plan prior to expiration extends beyond
the expiration of the 2016 Plan through the award’s normal expiration date.

Without the approval of the Company ’s stockholders, the Committee will not re-price, adjust or amend the exercise price of any options or the grant
price of any SAR previously awarded, whether through amendment, cancellation and replacement grant or any other means, except in connection with a stock
dividend or other distribution, including a stock split, merger or other similar corporate transaction or event, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the
benefits, or potential benefits intended to be provided under the 2016 Plan.

Other Stock Compensation Arrangements:

In November 2012, the Company granted each of the principals of its existing investor relations firm a warrant to purchase 112,500 shares of the
Company’s common stock (a total of 225,000 shares) for the firm’s part in creating awareness for the Company’s private equity placement, in November 2012,
as discussed herein. The warrants were exercisable at $0.55 per share for a five-year term. Each of the warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis. The
warrants also provide that subject to various conditions, the holders have piggy-back registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock that may be
acquired upon the exercise of the warrants. None of these warrants remain outstanding at December 31, 2019.

In June 2017, in connection with a subordinated loan agreement , the Company granted Cross River Partners, L.P. two five-year warrants to buy an
aggregate total of 1,612,902 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.31 per share, the average closing price of the Company’s
common stock for the 20-day period ended May 11, 2017. The warrants had a grant-date fair value of $0.19 per share and vested in full on June 28, 2017.
These warrants are accounted for as a liability in the balance sheet included in our financial statements included in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On June 29, 2018, all of these warrants were exercised, resulting in the issuance of $1,612,902 shares of the Company's common stock, and resulting in
proceeds of approximately $500,000 which were used to repay subordinated debt due to Cross River Partners, L. P.

On November 11, 2019 Enservco and Cross River Partners, L.P. entered into an Amended and Restated Subordinated Loan Agreement (the “Amended
Subordinated Loan”). The Amended Subordinated Loan increases the principal of the subordinated debt by $500,000 from $2.0 million to $2.5 million and
provides Cross River Partners with a five-year warrant to purchase 625,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share
which are fully vested upon issuance.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On November 30, 2017, a principal of the Company’s investor relations firm exercised common stock warrants to purchase 112,500 shares of Common
Stock, $0.005 par value, of the Company. The warrants were granted pursuant to an investor relations services agreement between the Company and that firm
as partial compensation for that firm’s part in creating awareness for the Company’s private equity placement in November 2012. The warrants were exercisable
at $0.55 per share for a five-year term ending on November 30, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the warrant agreement, the warrants were exercised on a
cashless basis and resulted in the issuance of 26,729 shares of common stock to the holder, and no cash proceeds to the Company. There were no underwriters
involved in any of the exercise transactions, and the Company paid no commissions or other remuneration as a result of the exercise of the warrants. The
holder of the warrant to whom the shares were issued is an existing security holder of the Company and represented to the Company that he is an accredited
investor; therefore, the shares were issued in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided in Section 3(a)(9), and Sections 4(a)(2) and (5) of the
Securities Act, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder. The transaction was made without any form of advertising or general solicitation, and the
holder of the warrant represented to the Company that he intended to acquire the shares for investment purposes only and without a view toward further
distribution.

On June 29, 2018, Cross River Partners, L.P. ("Cross River") exercised warrants to acquire 1,612,902 shares of our common stock. Proceeds of
$500,000 were used to reduce the principal balance of a subordinated loan held by Cross River. There were no underwriters involved in the transaction and the
Company issued the shares to Cross River in reliance on the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not
involving a public offering under Section 4(a)(2) of that act.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this Item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion provides information regarding the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and our financial

condition, liquidity and capital resources as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contain further detailed information, as well as the Risk Factors and the Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements included above.

Going Concern

Our financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business activities and the
realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. We incurred a net loss of $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
As of the balance sheet date of this report we had total current liabilities of $39.4 million, which exceeded our total current assets of $8.7 million by $30.7 million.
We are in breach of two of our covenants as well as failed to pay an overadvance that has continued through the date of this report related to the 2017 Credit
Agreement (as discussed in Note 7 of the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), resulting in our borrowings payable of
$34.0 million being classified in current liabilities. We have very limited liquidity and expect negative cash flow from operations in the near term.

We are also currently negotiating and working with East West Bank in an effort to obtain a waiver for our breaches of the 2017 Credit Agreement. Our
ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our renegotiation of the 2017 Credit Agreement and our ability to further reduce costs and raise further
capital, of which there can be no assurance. Further, there can be no assurance that we will successfully obtain a waiver from the East West Bank or maintain
or increase our cash flows from operations. Given our current financial situation we may be required to accept terms on the transactions that we are seeking that
are onerous to us. These factors raise substantial doubt over our ability to continue as a going concern and whether we will realize our assets and extinguish our
liabilities in the normal course of business and at the amounts stated in the financial statements.

OVERVIEW

The Company, through its subsidiary, Heat Waves Hot Oil Service, LLC ("Heat Waves"), provides a range of oil field services to the domestic onshore oil
and gas industry through two segments: 1) Production services, which include hot oiling and acidizing, and 2) Completion services, which includes frac water
heating. The Company owns and operates a fleet of approximately 390 specialized trucks, trailers, frac tanks and other well-site related equipment and serves
customers in several major domestic oil and gas areas, including the DJ Basin/Niobrara area in Colorado and Wyoming, the Bakken area in North Dakota, the
San Juan Basin in northwestern New Mexico, the Marcellus and Utica Shale areas in Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Jonah area, Green River and Powder River
Basins in Wyoming, the Eagle Ford Shale in Texas and the Stack and Scoop plays in the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary

Revenues for 2019 increased $266,000, or 1%, over 2018, due to generally stable industry conditions that deteriorated significantly in the fourth quarter
of 2019 and have continued through 2020 to date. During the year we reallocated some of our assets to better performing basins, increased our market share for
completion services through the Adler acquisition and revamped our executive team. Also, in 2019, we ceased operations of Heat Waves Water
Management. During 2018, we also ceased operations of Dillco Fluid Service, Inc. and our Heat Waves location in Kansas, while increasing our presence in the
Powder River Basin in eastern Wyoming, due to our outlook for activity levels in each location.

Segment profits for 2019 decreased by approximately $863,000 or 9%, to a profit of approximately $8.4 million from a profit of
approximately $9.3 million in 2018 due to a combination of higher fixed cost due to the acquisition of Adler Hot Oil Services, location consolidation
costs, and downward pricing pressures affecting our frac water heating services. Selling, general, & administrative expenses, excluding severance
and transition costs and acquisition-related expenses, increased by approximately $960,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared
to 2018, due primarily to general office expenses, related primarily to redundant Adler personnel, facilities, and related costs carried through the
heating season which have steadily been eliminated since late in the second quarter of 2019. These duplicative costs were due, in large part, to
the timing of the Adler acquisition coinciding with the start of heating season. We also made investments in our IT infrastructure, establishing an
electronic dispatch and ticketing system. In 2019, the resignation of our Chief Financial Officer resulted in Severance and Transition costs of
approximately $83,000. In 2018, the resignations of an officer and the Senior Vice President of Operations resulted in Severance and Transition
costs of approximately $633,000. Interest expense for 2019 increased by approximately $577,000 due to a higher average borrowing balance
related to the Adler acquisition, an increase in our borrowing rate due to the default in June 2019, and our increased time to collection on certain
customer receivables which was resolved in the third quarter of 2019.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $7.7 million, or $0.14 per share, compared to a net loss of

$5.9 million, or $0.11 per share, last year primarily due to the cost items and business dynamics noted above.

Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2019 was approximately $2.8 million compared to approximately $4.7 million in 2018. Adjusted

EBITDA is a non-GAAP number, and for a reconciliation to GAAP, see "Adjusted EBITDA" below.

Industry Overview

During 2019, WTI crude oil price averaged approximately $56.05 per barrel, versus an average of approximately $64.90 per barrel in 2018. The North
American rig count declined to 805 rigs in operation as of December 31, 2019, compared to 1,080 at the same time a year ago. Despite the lower oil price
environment and reduced rig count, we have grown our customer base and allocated resources to the most active basins. We are focused on increasing
utilization levels and optimizing the deployment of our equipment and workforce while maintaining high standards for service quality and safe operations. We
compete on the basis of the quality, breadth of our service offerings, and price.

The United States rig count bottomed out at approximately 400 in the spring of 2016 and increased to approximately 805 as of December 31,
2019 compared to approximately 1,080 at December 31, 2018, which translated into decreased activity for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared
to 2018.

In early March of 2020, the market experienced a precipitous decline in oil prices in response to oil demand concerns due to the economic impacts of the
COVID-19 virus and anticipated increases in supply from Russia and OPEC, particularly Saudi Arabia. While the impact of this oil price decline has yet to be felt
in demand for our services, we expect that our customers will reduce activity during this period of commodity price weakness and will also seek price reductions
for our services.

Segment Overview

Enservco’s reportable business segments are Production Services and Completion Services. These segments have been selected based

on management’s resource allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding the Company.

The following is a description of the segments.

Production Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of hot oil trucks and acidizing units to provide maintenance services to the domestic oil

and gas industry. These services include hot oil services and acidizing services.

Completion Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of frac water heating units to provide frac water heating services and related support

services to the domestic oil and gas industry.

Unallocated and other includes general overhead expenses and assets associated with managing all reportable operating segments which

have not been allocated to a specific segment.

Segment Results:

The following tables set forth revenue from operations and segment profits for our business segments for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and

2018 (in thousands):

REVENUES:

Production services
Completion services

Total Revenues

SEGMENT PROFIT (LOSS):

Production services
Completion services

Total Segment Profit (loss)

Production Services:

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2019

2018

14,704 $
28,322

43,026 $

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2019

2018

1,129 $
7,290

8,419 $

14,538
28,222

42,760

1,674
7,608

9,282

For 2019, production service revenue increased $166,000, or 1%, to $14.7 million. This increase was primarily attributable to our increased capacity and

customer base as a result of the acquisition of Adler.

Hot oil revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased 6% to $12.4 million compared to $11.7 million in 2018. The increase was primarily
due to the increase in our fleet size and market share in the basins we serve as a result of the acquisition of Adler, as well as to growth in our customer base in
our Central USA region.

Acidizing revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, decreased 20% to $2.3 million compared to $2.9 million in 2018. The year-over-year decline
was primarily driven by a decline in services performed for two customers in the Green River Basin and Eagle Ford Shale, who changed their maintenance
program. The decline was partially offset by new customer wins and growth in services performed for other customers and in new areas. The Company
continues to pursue customers and partner with chemical suppliers to develop new cost-effective acid programs in seeking to expand our acidizing services
across our service areas.

Segment profits for our production services decreased $545,000, or 33% in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to the investment in seeking to grow

the business in southern Texas which included additional hiring and training costs as well as the cost to open a new satellite facility in Carizzo Springs, Texas.

Completion Services:

Frac water heating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, remained flat compared to 2018. Our acquisition of Adler allowed us to realize
revenue from several customers we did not previously perform significant work for, and allowed us to increase services to other customers, particularly in the
Bakken and D-J Basin/Niobara. We also experienced increased demand in the Powder River, Marcellus and Utica shale basins during the first half of the year
which helped to offset declining industry conditions, including lower commodity prices and decreased drilling rig activity, during the fourth quarter of 2019.

Geographic Areas:

The Company operates in three geographically diverse regions of the United States . The following table sets forth revenue from operations for the
Company’s three geographic regions during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

BY GEOGRAPHY:
Production Services:

Rocky Mountain Region (1)
Central USA Region (2)
Eastern USA Region (3)

Total Production Services

Completion Services:

Rocky Mountain Region (1)
Central USA Region (2)
Eastern USA Region (3)

Total Completion Services
Total Revenues

Notes to tables:

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2019

2018

6,515 $
7,449
740
14,704

21,535
3,223
3,564
28,322
43,026 $

6,205
7,560
773
14,538

21,393
3,390
3,439
28,222
42,760

(1)

Includes the D-J Basin/Niobrara field (northeastern Colorado and southeastern Wyoming), the San Juan Basin (southeastern Colorado and Northeastern
New Mexico), the Powder River and Green River Basins (northeastern and southwestern Wyoming), the Bakken area (western North Dakota and
eastern Montana).
Includes the Scoop/Stack Shale in Oklahoma and the Eagle Ford Shale in Southern Texas .

(2)
(3) Consists of the southern region of the Marcellus Shale formation (southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Vi rginia) and the Utica Shale formation

(eastern Ohio).

Production segment revenue in the Rocky Mountain Region increased $310,000 or 5% for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the prior
year primarily due to an increase in hot oiling activity in the D-J Basin/Niobara and Bakken areas . Completion segment revenues stayed flat for the year ended
December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 due to a decreased demand for our services offset by our increased customer base and fleet size.

Production segment revenues in the Central USA region decreased approximately $111,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the

year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the closure of two facilities partially offset by increased activity in the Eagle Ford Shale.

Production segment revenues in the Eastern USA region remained relatively flat for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended

December 31, 2018 primarily due to decreased activity levels in the Marcellus shale formation.

Historical Seasonality of Revenues:

Because of the seasonality of our frac water heating business and, to a lesser extent, our hot oiling busines s, revenues generated during the cooler first
and fourth quarters of our fiscal year, constitute our “heating season,” and are typically significantly higher than revenues during the second and third quarters of
our fiscal year. In addition, the revenue mix of our service offerings changes outside our heating season as our Completion services (which includes frac water
heating) typically decrease as a percentage of total revenues and our Production services increase as a percentage of total revenue. Thus, the revenues
recognized in our quarterly financial statements in any given period are not indicative of the annual or quarterly revenues through the remainder of that fiscal
year.

As an indication of this quarter-to-quarter seasonality, the Company generated revenues of $32.9 million, or 76%, of its 2019 revenues during the first
and fourth quarters of 2019 compared to $10.1 million, or 24%, of 2019 revenues during the second and third quarters of 2019. In 2018, the Company generated
revenues of $32.6 million, or 76%, of its 2018 revenues during the first and fourth quarters of 2018 compared to $10.2 million, or 24%, of 2018 revenues during
the second and third quarters of 2017. In an effort to grow our year-round hot oiling revenues, we recently introduced a commission program to attract and retain
experienced hot oil operators, as these operators are able to retain customers in some cases regardless of which company the operator works for.

Direct Operating Expenses:

Direct operating expenses, which include labor costs, propane, fuel, chemicals, truck repairs and maintenance, supplies, insurance, and site overhead
costs for our operating segments increased by approximately $1.1 million or 3% during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to Adler-related costs in the first
half of 2019, and investment in growth in South Texas and Wyoming.

Sales, General and Administrative Expenses:

Sales, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $960,000, or 18%, to $6.2 million in 2019 compared to $5.2 million in
2018 primarily due to an increase in our bad debt reserve, an increase in compensation costs for our larger management team and an increase in general office
expenses, both partially due to our acquisition of Adler, and an increase in professional fees related to investment in our IT infrastructure and processes.

Patent Litigation and Defense Costs:

Patent litigation and defense costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 declined to $10,000 compared to $80,000 for 2018. As discussed in Item 3. –
Litigation, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado issued a decision on March 15, 2019 to dismiss this case in its entirety without any finding of
liability of Enservco or Heat Waves. We expect costs related to our defense of such claim to be minimal going forward.

Depreciation and Amortization:

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased approximately $821,000, or 17%, from 2018 due to

depreciation on equipment acquired in the Adler acquisition, partially offset by additional equipment becoming fully depreciated during 2019.

Severance and Transition Costs:

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized costs of approximately $83,000 related to the departure of its former Chief
Financial Officer. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized costs of approximately $633,000, related to the departure of a former
officer and the former Senior Vice President of Field Operations. The costs incurred during 2018 primarily consist of payments to the former officer and Senior
Vice President of Field Operations, but also include acceleration of stock-based compensation costs.

Income (Loss) from operations:

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized a loss from operations of $3.6 million compared to a loss of $1.4 million for 2018. The
in sales, general and administrative

loss of $2.2 million was primarily due

in segment profits, and an

to a decrease

increase

increased
expenses described above.

Interest Expense:

Interest expense increased approximately $577,000, or 26%, from 2018. The increase in our average borrowings along with increased interest rates on

our floating rate debt partially offset the decrease from the accelerated charges.

Discontinued Operations:

Loss from discontinued operations increased approximately $525,000 or 29% from 2018. Loss from discontinued operations for the year ended included

an impairment loss on assets held-for-sale of approximately $130,000 partially offset by a gain on disposal of equipment of approximately $129,000.

Income Taxes:

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had recorded a full valuation allowance on a net deferred tax asset of $4.9 million. Our income tax provision of
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, reduced the gross amount of the deferred tax asset and we reduced the valuation allowance by a like
amount which resulted in a net tax expense of approximately $32,000. Income tax expense was approximately $32,000 in 2019, compared to a tax expense of
$32,000 in 2018.

Adjusted EBITDA*:

Management believes that, for the reasons set forth below, Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure) is a valuable measurement of the Company's

liquidity and performance and is consistent with the measurements offered by other companies in Enservco's industry.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our net income to Adjusted EBITDA for years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2019

2018

(7,652) $

(5,865)

2,808
32
6,870
2,058

275
83
10
64
127
(80)
-
(1,252)
156
153
1,172
2,766 $

2,228
32
6,264
2,659

393
633
80
-
130
(237)
224
-
-
407
416
4,705

Net Loss
Add Back (Deduct)
Interest Expense
Provision for income taxes expense (benefit)
Depreciation and amortization (including discontinued operations)

EBITDA*
Add Back (Deduct)

Stock-based compensation
Severance and transition costs
Patent litigation and defense cost
One-time software expense
Impairment loss
(Gain) loss on sale and disposal of equipment (including discontinued operations)
Acquisition-related expenses
Gain on settlement
Adler consolidation
Other expense
EBITDA related to discontinued operations

Adjusted EBITDA

*Note: See below for discussion of the use of non-GAAP financial measurements.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Non-GAAP results are presented only as a supplement to the financial statements and for use within
management’s discussion and analysis based on U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The non-GAAP financial information is provided to
enhance the reader's understanding of the Company’s financial performance, but no non-GAAP measure should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of the most directly comparable GAAP measures to non-GAAP measures are provided
herein.

EBITDA is defined as net income, before interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA excludes noncash stock-
based compensation from EBITDA and, when appropriate, other items that management does not utilize in assessing the Company’s ongoing operating
performance as set forth in the next paragraph. None of these non-GAAP financial measures are recognized terms under GAAP and do not purport to be an
alternative to net income as an indicator of operating performance or any other GAAP measure.

All of the items included in the reconciliation from net income to EBITDA and from EBITDA to Adjus ted EBITDA are either (i) non-cash items (e.g.,
depreciation, amortization of purchased intangibles, stock-based compensation, impairment losses, etc.) or (ii) items that management does not consider to be
useful in assessing the Company’s ongoing operating performance (e.g., income taxes, gain or losses on sale of equipment, acquisition-related expenses, patent
litigation and defense costs, severance and transition costs, the gain on settlement as discussed in Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, impairment loss, one-time software expenses, the expenses to consolidate former Adler facilities, other expense (income),
EBITDA related to discontinued operations, etc.). In the case of the non-cash items, management believes that investors can better assess the company’s
operating performance if the measures are presented without such items because, unlike cash expenses, these adjustments do not affect the Company’s ability
to generate free cash flow or invest in its business.

We use, and we believe investors benefit from the presentation o f, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating our operating performance because it
provides us and our investors with an additional tool to compare our operating performance on a consistent basis by removing the impact of certain items that
management believes do not directly reflect our core operations. We believe that EBITDA is useful to investors and other external users of our financial
statements in evaluating our operating performance because EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard
to items such as interest expense, taxes, and depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting
methods and book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired. Additionally, our fixed charge coverage ratio
covenant associated with our 2017 Credit Agreement with East West Bank require the use of Adjusted EBITDA in specific calculations.

Because not all companies use identical calculations, the Company’s presentation of non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to other
similarly titled measures of other companies. However, these measures can still be useful in evaluating the Company’s performance against its peer companies
because management believes the measures provide users with valuable insight into key components of GAAP financial disclosures.

Changes in Adjusted EBITDA*

Adjusted EBITDA from operations declined $1.9 million to $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to an adjusted EBITDA of

$4.7 million for 2018, primarily due the increase in sales, general, and administrative expenses and the decline in segment profits as described above.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table summarizes our statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and (combined with the working capital

table and discussion below) is important for understanding our liquidity (amounts in thousands):

Net cash provided by ( used in) operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period

Years Ended December 31,
2018
2019

4,467 $
(458)
(3,603)
406

257

663 $

The following table sets forth a summary of certain aspects of our balance sheet at December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Current Assets
Total Assets
Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Working Capital (Current Assets net of Current Liabilities)
Stockholders’ equity

Overview:

Years Ended December 31,
2018
2019

8,731 $
42,976
39,738
45,652
(31,007)
(2,676)

1,336
(7,274)
5,804
(134)

391

257

13,530
49,021
7,452
44,419
6,078
4,602

We do not currently generate adequate revenue to satisfy our current operations and expect we will need substantial additional capital to maintain
operations for at least the remainder of 2020 absent a significant increase in demand for our services, which we do not expect. We cannot assure that we will be
successful in raising additional debt or equity capital, if at all. We incurred significant net operating losses during the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018,
which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We are also in breach of two of our covenants under the 2017 Credit Agreement
resulting in our borrowings thereunder of $34.0 million being classified as current liability, as well as failure to pay an overadvance that has continued through the
date of this report. Accordingly, our financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business
activities and the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. We are also currently negotiating and working with East West
Bank in an effort to obtain a waiver for our breaches of the 2017 Credit Agreement. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our renegotiation
of the 2017 Credit Agreement and our ability to further reduce costs and raise further capital, of which there can be no assurance. Further, there can be no
assurance that we will successfully obtain a waiver from the East West Bank or maintain or increase our cash flows from operations. Given our current financial
situation we may be required to accept terms on the transactions that we are seeking that are less favorable than would be otherwise available.

We have relied on cash flow from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit agreements, and equity and debt offerings to satisfy our liquidity
needs. Our ability to fund operating cash flow shortfalls, fund capital expenditures, and make acquisitions will depend upon our future operating performance and
on the availability of equity and debt financing. At December 31, 2019, we did not have any availability under the New Credit Facility. Our capital requirements for
2020 are anticipated to include, but are not limited to, operating expenses, debt servicing, and capital expenditures, including maintenance of our existing fleet of
assets.

As described in more detail in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements” of

this report, on August 10,
2017, we entered into the 2017 Credit Agreement with East West Bank which provides for a three-year $30 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the
“2017 Credit Facility”), that replaced the $30 million senior secured revolving credit Facility (the “Prior Credit Facility”) provided under the Amended and Restated
Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “2014 Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC”).

The 2017 Credit Agreement allows us to borrow up to 85% of our eligible receivables and up to 85% of the appraised value of our eligible equipment.

We used initial proceeds of approximately $21.8 million to repay all amounts due pursuant to the 2014 Credit Agreement, and pay other closing costs and fees.

In connection with the acquisition of Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC, on October 26, 2018 (the "Adler Acquisition"), Enservco and East West Bank entered
into a Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Consent (the “Second Amendment”), which amended the 2017 Credit Agreement. Pursuant to
the Second Amendment to LSA, East West Bank consented to the Adler Acquisition and increased the maximum borrowing limit of the senior secured revolving
credit facility provided to Enservco under the 2017 Credit Agreement to $37.0 million. Proceeds of $6.2 million from the increased senior secured revolving credit
facility were used in the Adler Acquisition to make the cash payments at closing and retire the indebtedness of Adler. In connection with the Second
Amendment the capital expenditure limitation contained within the Loan Agreement was increased to $3.0 million from $2.5 million. On August 12, 2019, we
entered into the Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Waiver with East West Bank that (i) waived a covenant default; (ii) provided for slightly
higher interest rates on borrowings under the 2017 Credit Facility; and (iii) reduced our allowable capital expenditures in any fiscal year from $3.0 million to $1.5
million.

On October 26, 2018, in connection with the Second Amendment to LSA, Adler entered into a Joinder Agreement, pursuant to which Adler was joined

as a party to the Loan Agreement.

As of December 31, 2019, we had an outstanding principal loan balance under the 2017 Credit Agreement of approximately $34.0 million with weighted-
average interest rates of 5.47% per year for the $28.0 million of outstanding LIBOR Rate borrowings and 6.75% per year for the $6.0 million of outstanding prime
rate borrowings.

The 2017 Credit Agreement has certain customary financial covenants and consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019, as described below:

(i)

(ii)

a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined, not less than 1.10 to 1.00, measured as of the last day of each month based on trailing
twelve-month information);

In periods when the trailing twelve-month fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.20 to 1.00, we are required to maintain minimum liquidity of
$1,500,000 (including excess availability under the 2017 Credit Agreement and balance sheet cash).

On January 6, 2020, the Company received a notice (the “Default Notice”) from East West Bank regarding events of default of the Company with

respect to the 2017 Credit Agreement.

The Default Notice indicates that the Company is in default under the 2017 Credit Agreement as a result of its:

•failure to immediately repay a loan overadvance that occurred on October 10, 2019 that has continued through January 6, 2020;

•failure to maintain a minimum liquidity of not less than $1,500,000 for the months ended October 31, 2019 and November 30, 2019; and

•failure to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1:10 to 1:00 for the months ended October 31, 2019 and November 30, 2019.

We are also currently negotiating and working with East West Bank in an effort to obtain a waiver for our breaches of the 2017 Credit Agreement. Our
ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our renegotiation of the 2017 Credit Agreement and our ability to further reduce costs and raise further
capital, of which there can be no assurance. Further, there can be no assurance that we will successfully obtain a waiver from the East West Bank or maintain
or increase our cash flows from operations. Given our current financial situation we may be required to accept terms on the transactions that we are seeking that
are onerous to us. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on achievement of significantly increased revenues, raising equity or additional debt
and/or a combination transaction with another entity. If we are not able to generate the funds needed to cover our ongoing expenses, then we may be forced to
cease operations or seek bankruptcy protection, in which event our stockholders could lose their entire investment.

Liquidity:

As of December 31, 2019, our available liquidity was $663,000 which represented our cash balance and we did not have any availability on the 2017
Credit Facility (subject to a covenant requirement that we maintain $1.5 million of available liquidity in periods where our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than
1.2:1). We utilize the 2017 Credit Facility to fund working capital requirements and investments, and during the year ended December 31, 2019, we received net
cash proceeds from our various lines of credit of approximately $61,000 and additionally received $125,000 in non-cash proceeds to fund expenses related to
the notes.

Working Capital:

As of December 31, 2019, we had negative working capital of approximately $31.0 million compared to working capital of $6.1 million as of December
31, 2018. The decrease in working capital was primarily attributable to the classification of our 2017 Credit Agreement to short term as well as the short term
note payable to the seller of Adler, partially offset by a decrease in our other current liabilities as of December 31, 2019, compared to December 31, 2018.

Deferred Tax Asset, net:

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had recorded a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax assets to zero.

Cash flow from Operating Activities:

Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased approximately $3.1 million to $4.5 million compared to cash used
in operating activities of $1.3 million during 2018, primarily due to (i) the increase in cash provided by the monetization of accounts receivable and the increase
in cash flows related to the change in accounts payable balances during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 partially offset by the increase in
Net Loss..

Cash flow from Investing Activities:

Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $457,000 compared to $7.3 million during 2018. The decrease is primarily

attributable to the acquisition of Adler, as described in more detail Note 4 to our financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements” of this report.

Cash flow from Financing Activities:

Cash used in financing activities for year ended December 31, 2019 was $3.6 million compared to cash provided by financing activities of $5.8 million for
the year ended 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we received proceeds from our revolving credit facility to fund the acquisition of Adler. The
change is due to our repayment of the Seller Subordinated Note related to the purchase of Adler.

Outlook:

Over the past two years we have invested significantly in process improvement initiatives designed to make the Company operate more efficiently and
take better advantage of our expanded fleet and national leadership position in frac water heating. We face a very difficult operating environment in 2020 with
exploration and production companies significantly cutting back their drilling and completions plans and exerting significant pressure on us to reduce our prices
for the services we provide. Additionally, as indicated above, we are in default under out 2017 Credit Agreement and we will need additional debt or equity
capital to continue operations through 2020. We cannot assure that we will raise such capital on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Due to our lack of capital we
may be forced to curtail operations in some or all of our locations which will materially adversely affect our revenues and our ability to continue as a going
concern. In the event we are able to continue as a going concern, our long-term goals include driving increased fleet utilization, optimizing fleet deployment,
driving further operating efficiencies through technology and proactive cost management, and de-levering our balance sheet. Our business is heavily dependent
on exploration and production activity levels, which fluctuate based on commodity prices, capital budgets and other factors. Activity levels have significantly
declined in the fourth quarter of 2019 due to year-end capital budget exhaustion, decreases in drilling and completion activity and substantial price decreases for
crude oil and natural gas that occurred during the first quarter of 2020. Those declines may be partially mitigated by demand for our Production Services. We
continue to seek opportunities to expand our business operations through organic growth, including increasing the volume of current services offered to our new
and existing customers. We will also continue to expand our customer relationships while maintaining an appropriate balance between recurring maintenance
work and drilling and completion related services.

Capital Commitments and Obligations:

Our capital obligations as of December 31, 2019 consist primarily the 2017 Credit Agreement which matures August 10, 2020. In addition, we also
have scheduled principal payments under certain term loans and operating leases. General terms and conditions for amounts due under these commitments and
obligations are summarized in the notes to the financial statements. As discussed above, our lender under the 2017 Credit Agreement has declared us to be in
default on our $34.0 million of indebtedness due to it and has reserved all its rights and remedies under the agreement including the right to accelerate and
declare our loans due and payable and to foreclose on the collateral pledged, in whole or in part.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of December 31, 2019, we had no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on
our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are
material to our stockholders.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles req uires management to make a variety of
estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements, and (ii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods covered by the financial statements.

Our management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and
assumptions affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increase, these judgments become even more subjective and complex. Although we believe that
our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates and assumptions based upon
actual results may have a material impact on our results of operation and/or financial condition. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

While all of the significant accounting estimates are important to the Company ’s financial statements, the following accounting policies and the estimates

derived there from have been identified as being critical.

Going Concern

Our financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business activities and the
realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. We incurred a net loss of $7.7 for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of
the balance sheet date of this report we had total current liabilities of $39.4 million, which exceeded our total current assets of $8.7 million by $30.7 million. We
are in breach of two of our covenants and have failed to repay overadvance that has continued through the date of this report related to the 2017 Credit
Agreement (as discussed in Note 7 of the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), resulting in our borrowings payable of
$34.0 million being classified in current liabilities.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the renegotiation of the 2017 Credit Agreement and/or raising further capital. These factors
raise substantial doubt over our ability to continue as a going concern and whether we will realize our assets and extinguish our liabilities in the normal course of
business and at the amounts stated in the financial statements.

We are currently negotiating with East West Bank, however given our current financial situation we may be forced to accept terms on these transactions
that are less favorable than would be otherwise available. As of the date of this report East West Bank has not waived our breaches of the 2017 Credit
Agreement.

Accounts Receivable:

Accounts receivable are stated at the amounts billed to customers, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. The Company provides an allowance
for uncollectable accounts based on a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. The allowance for
uncollectible amounts is continually reviewed and adjusted to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to cover future losses. The allowance is
management's best estimate of uncollectible amounts and is determined based on historical collection experience related to accounts receivable coupled with a
review of the current status of existing receivables. The losses ultimately incurred could differ materially in the near term from the amounts estimated in
determining the allowance.

Long-Lived Assets:

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impa irment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recovered. The Company looks primarily to the discounted future cash flows in its assessment of whether or
not long-lived assets have been impaired.

Income Taxes:

The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a
change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities will be recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income taxes are
classified as a net current or non-current asset or liability based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting purposes. A deferred
tax asset or liability that is not related to an asset or liability for financial reporting is classified according to the expected reversal date. The Company records a
valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that it believes is more likely than not expected to be realized.

The Company accounts for any uncertainty in income taxes by recognizing the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not
that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company measures the tax
benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate resolution. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. As
such, the Company is required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance
surrounding income tax law and regulations change over time and may result in changes to the Company’s subjective assumptions and judgments which can
materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income. The result of the reassessment of the
Company’s tax positions did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Interest and penalties associated with tax positions are recorded in the period assessed as income tax expense. The Company files income tax returns
in the United States and in the states in which it conducts its business operations. The Company’s United States federal income tax filings for tax years
2014 through 2018 remain open to examination. In general, the Company’s various state tax filings remain open for tax years 2014 to 2018.

Business Combinations.

We utilize the purchase method to account for acquisitions of businesses and assets. The value of the purchase consideration takes into account the
degree to which the consideration is objective and measurable such as cash consideration paid to a seller. Pursuant to purchase method accounting, we allocate
the cost of the acquisition to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on fair values as of the acquisition date. The purchase price allocations are based on
appraisals, discounted cash flows, quoted market prices and estimates by management.

In estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, we make various assumptions. The most significant assumptions relate to the
estimated fair values assigned to intangible assets. To estimate the fair values of these assets, we employed the income, market, or a cost approach, as
appropriate. The income valuation method represents the present value of future cash flows over the life of the asset using: (i) discrete financial forecasts, which
rely on management’s estimates of volumes, commodity prices, revenue and operating expenses; (ii) long-term growth rates; and (iii) appropriate discount
rates. The market valuation method uses prices paid for a reasonably similar asset by other purchasers in the market, with adjustments relating to any
differences between the assets. The cost valuation method is based on the replacement cost of a comparable asset at prices at the time of the acquisition
reduced for depreciation of the asset.

Stock-based Compensation:

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the award as described below, and is recognized

over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the equity grant.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model as a method for determining the estimated grant date fair value for all stock options awarded to
employees, independent contractors, officers, and directors. The expected term of the options is based upon evaluation of historical and expected exercise
behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based upon U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life of the
grant. Volatility is determined upon historical volatility of our stock and adjusted if future volatility is expected to vary from historical experience. The dividend yield
is assumed to be none as we have not paid dividends nor do we anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company used the market-value of Company stock to determine the fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awards. The fair-value is

updated quarterly based on actual forfeitures.

The Company used a Lattice model to determine the fair value of market-based restricted stock awards.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this Item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Financial Statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and
Board of Directors of Enservco Corporation

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Enservco Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018; the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended; and the related notes (collectively referred to as the
“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method for accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption
of the new lease standard. The Company adopted the new lease standard using a modified retrospective approach.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has substantial debt obligations that are due within one year. The ongoing capital and operating
expenditures, including the debt interest payments, will vastly exceed the amount of cash on hand and the revenue the Company expects to generate from
operations in the near future. These conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 2, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud,
and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.

Denver, Colorado
March 19, 2020

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)

ASSETS

December 31,

2019

2018

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Inventories
Income tax receivable, current
Current assets of discontinued operations

Total current assets

Property and Equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Income tax receivable, non-current
Right-of-use asset - financing, net
Right-of-use asset - operating, net

Other Assets
Non-current assets of discontinued operations

TOTAL ASSETS

Current Liabilities

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Senior revolving credit facility
Note payable
Lease liability - financing, current
Lease liability - operating, current

Current portion of long-term debt
Current liabilities of discontinued operations

Total current liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities

Senior revolving credit facility
Subordinated debt
Long-term debt, less current portion
Lease liability - financing, less current portion
Lease liability - operating, less current portion
Other liability
Long-term liability of discontinued operations

Total long-term liabilities
Total liabilities

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)

Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred stock. $0.005 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock. $0.005 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 55,642,829 and 54,389,829 shares issued as of
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively; 103,600 shares of treasury stock; and 55,539,229 and
54,286,229 shares outstanding December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively
Additional paid-in-capital
Accumulated deficit

Total stockholders’ equity

663 $
6,424
1,016
398
43
187
8,731

26,620
546
828
14
569
3,793
445
1,430

42,976 $

4,470 $
33,994
-
207
848
147
72
39,738

-
2,381
198
259
3,009
33
34
5,914
45,652

257
9,848
1,043
514
85
1,783
13,530

30,858
546
1,033
28
-
-
650
2,376

49,021

3,094
-
3,868
-
-
149
341
7,452

33,882
1,832
312
-
-
941
-
36,967
44,419

278
22,066
(25,020)
(2,676)

271
21,797
(17,466)
4,602

49,021

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

42,976 $

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2019

2018

Revenues

Production services
Completion services
Total revenues

Expenses

Production services
Completion services
Sales, general and administrative expenses
Patent litigation and defense costs
Severance and transition costs
Gain on disposal of equipment
Impairment
Depreciation and amortization

Total operating expenses

Loss from operations

Other (expense) income

Interest expense
Gain on settlement
Other expense

Total other expense

Loss from continuing operations before tax benefit
Income tax expense
Loss from continuing operations
Discontinued operations (Note 6)

Loss from operations of discontinued operations (including gain on disposal of $129,000 and loss on
impairment of $130,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018)
Income tax expense
Loss on discontinued operations

Net loss

Loss from continuing operations per common share – basic and diluted
Loss from discontinued operations per common share – basic and diluted
Net loss per share

14,704 $
28,322
43,026

13,575
21,032
6,153
10
83
(73)
127
5,692
46,599

(3,573)

(2,805)
1,252
(162)
(1,715)

(5,288)
(32)
(5,320) $

(2,332)

-
(2,332)
(7,652) $

(0.10) $
(0.04)
(0.14) $

14,538
28,222
42,760

12,864
20,614
5,193
80
633
(104)
-
4,871
44,151

(1,391)

(2,228)
-
(407)
(2,635)

(4,026)
(32)
(4,058)

(1,807)

-
(1,807)
(5,865)

(0.08)
(0.03)
(0.11)

Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding

55,071

52,865

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)

Common
Shares

Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Accumulated
Earnings
(Deficit)

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

Balance at January 1, 2018

51,094 $

255 $

19,571 $

(11,601) $

8,225

Cashless exercise of warrants
Stock-based compensation, net of issuance costs
Cashless option exercise
Restricted share issuance
Restricted share cancellation
Net loss

1,613
-
663
1,043
(127)
-

9
-
3
5
(1)
-

1,862
371
(3)
(5)
1
-

-
-
-
-
-
(5,865)

1,871
371
-
-
-
(5,865)

Balance at December 31, 2018

54,286 $

271 $

21,797 $

(17,466) $

4,602

Opening balance adjustment
Stock-based compensation, net of issuance costs
Restricted share issuance
Restricted share cancellation
Net loss

-
-
1,523
(270)
-

-
-
7
-
-

-
277
(8)

98
-
-
-
(7,652)

Balance at December 31, 2019

55,539 $

278 $

22,066 $

(25,020) $

98
277
(1)
-
(7,652)

(2,676)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2019

2018

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net loss
Net loss from discontinued operations
Net loss from continuing operations
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

(7,652)
(2,332)
(5,320)

5,692
(73)
127
(1,252)
-
275
321
62
160

3,257
116
17
43
736
274
1,328
(727)
44
5,080
(613)
4,467

-
(1,191)
49
284
(858)
400
(458)

61
500
(3,700)
(115)
(326)
(1)
(3,581)
(22)
(3,603)

(5,865)
(1,807)
(4,058)

4,871
(104)
-
-
540
393
297
-
31

988
38
1,079
(28)
-
(120)
(2,806)
-
25
1,146
190
1,336

(6,164)
(1,058)
122
578
(6,522)
(752)
(7,274)

6,728
-
(800)
(93)
-
(31)
5,804
-
5,804

(134)
391
257

406
257
663

Depreciation and amortization
(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment
Impairment loss
Gain on settlement
Change in fair value of warrants
Stock-based compensation
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount
Lease termination expense
Provision for bad debt expense

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Income taxes receivable
Amortization of operating lease assets
Other assets
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Operating lease liabilities
Other liabilities

Net cash provided by operating activities - continuing operations
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities - discontinued operations

Net cash provided by operating activities

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Acquisition of Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC
Purchases of property and equipment
Proceeds from insurance claims
Proceeds from disposal of equipment
Net cash used in investing activities - continuing operations
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities - discontinued operations

Net cash used in investing activities

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net line of credit borrowings
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Repayment of long-term debt
Repayment of note
Payments of finance leases
Other financing
Net cash provided by financing activities - continuing operations
Net cash used in financing activities - discontinued operations

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

Net decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

Supplemental cash flow information:

Cash paid for interest
Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:

Non-cash proceeds from revolving credit facilities
Cashless exercise of stock options
Non-cash proceeds from warrant exercise
Non-cash subordinated debt principal repayment
Non-cash conversion of warrant liability to equity
Non-cash proceeds from subordinated debt borrowings
Non-cash repayment of revolving credit facility

$
$

$
$
$
$
$
$
$

2,281
32

$
$

125
-
-
-
-
-
-

$
$
$
$
$
$
$

1,838
32

141
994
500
(500)
1,371
4,800
-

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENSERVCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Enservco Corporation (“ Enservco”) through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”, “we” or “us”) provides various
services to the domestic onshore oil and natural gas industry. These services include frac water heating (completion services); and hot oiling and acidizing
(production services).

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been derived from the accoun ting records of Enservco Corporation, Heat Waves
Hot Oil Service LLC (“Heat Waves”), Dillco Fluid Service, Inc. (“Dillco”), Heat Waves Water Management LLC (“HWWM”), and Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC
("Adler") (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the results of operations for the years then ended.

The below table provides an overview of the Company ’s current ownership hierarchy:

Name

State of
Formation

Ownership

Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Business
Oil and natural gas well services, including logistics and
stimulation.

Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC

Delaware

100% by Enservco

Operations integrated into Heat Waves during 2019.

Heat Waves Water Management
LLC

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Discontinued operations in 2019.

Dillco Fluid Service, Inc.

Kansas

100% by Enservco

Discontinued operation in 2018.

HE Services LLC

Nevada

100% by Heat Waves

No active business operations. Owns construction
equipment used by Heat Waves.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“GAAP”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Going Concern

Our financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business activities and the
realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. We incurred a net loss of $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
As of the balance sheet date of this report we had total current liabilities of $39.7 million, which exceeded our total current assets of $8.7 million by $31.0 million.
We are in breach of two of our covenants and have failed to pay an overadvance that has continued through the date of this report related to the 2017 Credit
Agreement (as discussed in Note 7 of the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), resulting in our borrowings payable of
$34.0 million being classified in current liabilities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company
continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions with which it invests. Enservco maintains its excess cash in various
financial institutions, where deposits may exceed federally insured amounts at times.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at the amounts billed to customers, net of an allowance fo r uncollectible accounts. The Company provides an allowance
for uncollectible accounts based on a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. The allowance for
uncollectible amounts is continually reviewed and adjusted to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to cover future losses. The allowance is
management's best estimate of uncollectible amounts and is determined based on historical collection experience related to accounts receivable coupled with a
review of the current status of existing receivables. The losses ultimately incurred could differ materially in the near term from the amounts estimated in
determining the allowance. As of December 31, 2019, a n d December 31, 2018, the Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately
$246,000 and $116,000, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2019 a n d 2018, the Company recorded approximately $160,000 and $31,000,
respectively to bad debt expense.

Concentrations

As of December 31, 2019, two customers represented more than 10% of the Company's accounts receivable balance at 16% and 11% respectively.
Revenues from one customer represented approximately 11% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, no single
customer comprised more than 10% of the Company's accounts receivable balance. Revenues from one customer represented approximately 10% of total
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Inventories

Inventory consists primarily of propane, diesel fuel and chemicals that are used in the servicing of oil wells and is carried at the lower of cost or net
realizable value in accordance with the first in, first out method (FIFO). The Company periodically reviews the value of items in inventory and provides write-
downs or write-offs, of inventory based on its assessment of market conditions. Write-downs and write-offs are charged to cost of goods sold. During the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not recognize any write-downs or write-offs of inventory.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of ( 1) trucks, trailers and pickups; (2) water transfer pumps, pipe, lay flat hose, trailers, and other support equipment;
(3) real property which includes land and buildings used for office and shop facilities and wells u sed for the disposal of water; and ( 4) other equipment such as
tools used for maintaining and repairing vehicles, and office furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment. Property and equipment is stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation. The Company capitalizes interest on certain qualifying assets that are undergoing activities to prepare them for their intended use.
Interest costs incurred during the fabrication period are capitalized and amortized over the life of the assets. The Company charges repairs and maintenance
against income when incurred and capitalizes renewals and betterments, which extend the remaining useful life, expand the capacity or efficiency of the assets.
Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of 5 to 30 years.

Any difference between net book value of the property and equipment and the proceeds of an assets ’ sale or settlement of an insurance claim is

recorded as a gain or loss in the Company’s earnings.

Leases

The Company assesses whether an arrangement is a lease at inception. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the
balance sheet. We have elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all assets. Operating lease assets and operating
lease liabilities are calculated based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the lease start date. As most of our
leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease start date in determining the
present value of future payments. The operating lease asset is increased by any lease payments made at or before the lease start date and reduced by lease
incentives and initial direct costs incurred. The lease term includes options to renew or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise
that option. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. The depreciable life of lease assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the
lease term. Lease expense for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company conducts a m ajor part of its operations from leased facilities . Each of these leases is accounted for as an operating lease. Operating lease
assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date. Operating lease liabilities represent the present value of lease payments not yet paid.
Operating lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset and are based upon the operating lease liabilities adjusted for prepayments or accrued
lease payments, initial direct costs, lease incentives, and impairment of operating lease assets.

The Company amortizes leasehold improvements over the shorter of the life of the lease or the life of the improvements.

The Company has leased trucks and equipment in the normal course of business, which may be recorded as operating or financing leases, depending
on the term of the lease. The Company recorded rental expense on equipment under operating leases over the lease term as it becomes payable; there were no
rent escalation terms associated with these equipment leases. The Company records amortization expense on equipment under financing leases on a straight-
line basis as well as interest expense based on our implicit borrowing rate at the date of the lease inception. The equipment leases contain purchase options that
allow the Company to purchase the leased equipment at the end of the lease term, based on the market price of the equipment at the time of the lease
termination.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset
may not be recovered. The Company reviews both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the business during the analysis of impairment. During the quantitative
review, the Company reviews the undiscounted future cash flows in its assessment of whether or not long-lived assets have been impaired. The
Company recorded impairment charges of approximately $127,000 related to its salt water disposal wells which it expects to divest during 2020.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets received attributable to business acquisitions and combinations.
Goodwill and other intangible assets are measured for impairment at least annually and/or whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate impairment
may exist, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate. In assessing the value of goodwill, assets and liabilities are assigned to the reporting
units and the appropriate valuation methodologies are used to determine fair value at the reporting unit level. Identified intangible assets are amortized using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.

Revenue Recognition

We have adopted Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue - Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Accounting Standards Codification
("ASC") Topic 606, beginning January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective approach, which we have applied to contracts within the scope of the standard.
There was no material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements from adoption of this new standard. The Company evaluates
revenue when we can identify the contract with the customer, the performance obligations in the contract, the transaction price, and we are certain that the
performance obligations have been met. Revenue is recognized when the service has been provided to the customer. The vast majority of the Company's
services and product offerings are short-term in nature. The time between invoicing and when payment is due under these arrangements is generally 30 to 60
days. Revenue is not generated from contractual arrangements that include multiple performance obligations.

The Company’s agreements with its customers are often referred to as “price sheets” and sometimes provide pricing for multiple services. However,
these agreements generally do not authorize the performance of specific services or provide for guaranteed throughput amounts. As customers are free to
choose which services, if any, to use based on the Company’s price sheet, the Company prices its separate services on the basis of their standalone selling
prices. Customer agreements generally do not provide for performance, cancellation, termination, or refund type provisions. Services based on price sheets with
customers are generally performed under separately issued “work orders” or “field tickets” as services are requested.

Revenue is recognized for certain projects that take more than one day projects over time based on the number of days during the reporting period and

the agreed upon price as work progresses on each project.

Disaggregation of revenue

See Note 13 - Segment Reporting for disaggregation of revenue.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Earnings per Common Share - Basic is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Earnings per Common Share - Diluted earnings is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the diluted weighted average number of common shares.
The diluted weighted average number of common shares is computed using the treasury stock method for common stock that may be issued for outstanding
stock options and warrants.

As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, there were outstanding stock options and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 2,600,333 and 2,574,665 shares of
Company common stock, respectively, which have a potentially dilutive impact on earnings per share. As of December 31, 2019, these outstanding stock options
and warrants had no aggregate intrinsic value (the difference between the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2019, and the
exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money instruments). As of December 31, 2019, the outstanding stock options and warrants had no intrinsic
value. As of December 31, 2018, the aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding stock options and warrants was approximately $93,000. Dilution is not permitted if
there are net losses during the period. As such, the Company does not show diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Loan Fees and Other Deferred Costs

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into loan agreements and amendments thereto with its primary lending institutions. The majority
of these lending agreements and amendments require origination fees and other fees in the course of executing the agreements. For all costs associated with
the execution of the lending agreements, the Company recognizes these as capitalized costs and amortizes these costs over the remaining term of the loan
agreement. All other costs not associated with the execution of the loan agreements are expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately
$82,000 in unamortized loan fees and other deferred costs associated with the 2017 Credit Agreement, which we expect to charge to expense ratably over the
three-year term of that agreement.

Derivative Instruments

From time to time, the Company has interest rate swap agreements in place to hedge against changes in interest rates. The fair value of the Company’s
derivative instruments are reflected as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends
on the intended use of the derivative instrument and the resulting designation. Transactions related to the Company’s derivative instruments accounted for as
hedges are classified in the same category as the item hedged in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company did not hold derivative instruments at
December 31, 2019 or 2018, for trading purposes.

On February 23, 2018, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with East West Bank in order to hedge against the variability in cash flows from
future interest payments related to the 2017 Credit Agreement. The terms of the interest rate swap agreement included an initial notional amount of $10.0 million,
a fixed payment rate of 2.52% paid by us and a floating payment rate equal to LIBOR paid by East West Bank. The purpose of the swap agreement is to adjust
the interest rate profile of our debt obligations. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreement is recorded in Other Liabilities and changes to the fair value are
recorded to Other Expense.

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets (Note 9) based on the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities will be recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A
deferred tax asset or liability that is not related to an asset or liability for financial reporting is classified according to the expected reversal date. The Company
records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that it believes is more likely than not expected to be realized.

The Company accounts for any uncertainty in income taxes by recognizing the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if, in the Company's
opinion, it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.
The Company measures the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50%
likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous
and are often ambiguous. As such, the Company is required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding income tax exposures.
Interpretations of and guidance surrounding income tax law and regulations change over time and m a y result in changes to the Company’s subjective
assumptions and judgments which can materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income. The
result of the reassessment of the Company’s tax positions did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Interest and penalties associated with tax positions are recorded in the peri od assessed as Other expense. The Company files income tax returns in the
United States and in the states in which it conducts its business operations. The Company’s United States federal income tax filings for tax years 2016 through
2019 remain open to examination. In general, the Company’s various state tax filings remain open for tax years 2015 to 2019.

Fair Value

The Company follows authoritative guidance that applies to all financial assets and liabilities required to be measured and reported on a fair value basis.
The Company also applies the guidance to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including non-competition
agreements and goodwill. The guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that
maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.

Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Beginning in 2017, the Company valued its warrants using the Binomial Lattice model
("Lattice"). The Company did not have any transfers between hierarchy levels during the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018. The financial and
nonfinancial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:

Level 1:
Level 2:
Level 3:

Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities that are observable for the asset or liability; or

Unobservable pricing inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources, such as discounted cash flow models or valuations.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the award as described below, and is recognized

over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the equity grant.

The Company uses a Lattice model to determine the fair value of certain warrants. The expected term used was the remaining contractual term.
Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility over a term consistent with the remaining term. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the yield on zero-
coupon U.S. government securities with a remaining term equal to the contractual term of the warrants. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero.

The Company used the market-value of Company stock to determine the fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awarded in 2019 and

2018. The fair-value is updated quarterly based on actual forfeitures.

The Company used a Lattice model to determine the fair value of market-based restricted stock awarded in 2019 and 2018.

Management Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates
include the realization of accounts receivable, evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation expense, income tax provision, the
valuation of warrant liability and the Company’s interest rate swaps, and the valuation of deferred taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications have no

effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

Business Combinations

We recognize and measure the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition
date, with any remaining difference recorded as goodwill or gain from a bargain purchase. For material acquisitions, management typically engages an
independent valuation specialist to assist with the determination of fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest, if any, and
goodwill, based on recognized business valuation methodologies. If the initial accounting for the business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting
period in which the acquisition occurs, an estimate will be recorded. Subsequent to the acquisition, and not later than one year from the acquisition date, we will
record any material adjustments to the initial estimate based on new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition
date. An income, market or cost valuation method may be utilized to estimate the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling
interest, if any, in a business combination. The income valuation method represents the present value of future cash flows over the life of the asset using:
(i) discrete financial forecasts, which rely on management’s estimates of volumes, commodity prices, revenue and operating expenses; (ii) long-term growth
rates; and (iii) appropriate discount rates. The market valuation method uses prices paid for a reasonably similar asset by other purchasers in the market, with
adjustments relating to any differences between the assets. The cost valuation method is based on the replacement cost of a comparable asset at prices at the
time of the acquisition reduced for depreciation of the asset. See Note 4 – Business Combinations for additional information regarding our business
combinations.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which introduces the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those
leases classified as operating leases under previous guidance. The update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018,
including interim periods within those reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The original guidance required application on a modified retrospective
basis with the earliest period presented. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Targeted Improvements to ASC 842, Leases, which includes an
option to not restate comparative periods in transition and elect to use the effective date of ASC 842, Leases, as the date of initial application of transition.
Based on the effective date, the Company adopted this ASU beginning on January 1, 2019 and elected the transition option provided under ASU 2018-11.
This standard had a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet with the recognition of new right of use assets and lease liabilities for all operating
leases, as these leases typically have a non-cancelable lease term of greater than one year. Upon adoption, both assets and liabilities on our consolidated
balance sheets increased by approximately $2.4 million. The Company elected a package of transition practical expedients which include not reassessing
whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, not reassessing the lease classification of expired or existing leases, and not reassessing
initial direct costs for existing leases. The Company also elected a practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components. The Company did
not elect the practical expedient to use hindsight in determining the lease terms or assessing impairment of the Right-of-Use (‘ROU”) assets. See Note 12 -
Commitments and Contingencies for more information.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Statements - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments, which requires companies to measure credit losses utilizing a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires a consideration of a
broader range of reasonable and supportable information to ascertain credit loss estimates. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-13 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 - Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following at (amounts in thousands):

Trucks and vehicles
Other equipment
Buildings and improvements
Land
Disposal wells
Total property and equipment
Accumulated depreciation

Property and equipment, net

December 31,
2019

December 31,
2018

59,788 $
1,303
3,184
378
-
64,653
(38,033)
26,620 $

59,535
961
2,822
378
400
64,096
(33,238)
30,858

Note 4 – Business Combinations

Acquisition of Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC

On October 26, 2018, Enservco Corporation entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Adler Hot Oil Holdings,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), pursuant to which Enservco acquired all of the outstanding membership interests of Adler Hot Oil
Service, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Adler”) for a gross aggregate purchase price of $12.5 million, plus approximately $500,000 in working capital
adjustments (the “Transaction”). The purchase price allocation differs from the gross aggregate purchase price due to fair value adjustments to the indemnity
holdback, earnout, plus the discount on the subordinated note. Certain former members of Adler are also parties to the Agreement. Adler is a provider of frac
water heating and hot oiling services, whose assets consist primarily of vehicles and equipment, with a complementary base of customers in several oil and gas
producing basins where Enservco operates.

The consideration paid or to be paid by Enservco under the Agreement originally included: (i) $3.7 million in cash paid to or for the benefit of the Seller
at the closing; (ii) a subordinated promissory note issued to the Seller in the principal amount of $4.8 million, plus interest accrued thereon (the “Seller
Subordinated Note”), as further discussed below; (iii) retirement by Enservco of $2.5 million in indebtedness of Adler; (iv) an earn-out payment of up to $1.0
million in cash payable to the Seller (the "Earn-Out Payment"), the actual amount of which is subject to Enservco’s satisfaction of certain EBITDA-related
performance conditions during 2019; and (v) $1.0 million in cash held by Enservco and payable to the Seller on the 18 month anniversary of October 26, 2018,
subject to offset by Enservco for any indemnification obligations owed by the Seller or certain former members of Adler under the Agreement (the "Indemnity
Holdback Payment"). Certain aspects of the consideration have been modified since execution of the Agreement as further discussed below.

On April 4, 2019 Enservco and the Seller entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) in order to
resolve certain disputes and disagreements relating to the Transaction without litigation. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement the parties agreed to (i) waive all
rights of the Seller to the Earn-Out Payment and the Indemnity Holdback Payment, (ii) reduce the original principal balance of the Seller Subordinated Note from
$4,800,000 to $4,500,000, (iii) extend the maturity date of the Seller Subordinated Note from March 31, 2019 to April 10, 2019, subject to a nine day grace
period, and (iv) mutually release one another from any and all demands, claims and causes of action, existing, or arising out of or related to (A) the sale and
purchase of Adler, (B) the Purchase Agreement or the Ancillary Documents referred to therein, (C) Adler, (D) loans by the Seller to Adler, or (E) the transactions
or activities connected with any of the foregoing or any prior dealings of any of the Seller, on the one hand, and Enservco on the other hand, in each case
subject to exceptions for claims arising from breaches of the Settlement Agreement and enumerated provisions of the Purchase Agreement. All adjustments to
the original purchase accounting are recognized in the second quarter of 2019, when the settlement occurred. We also considered whether the execution of the
Settlement Agreement was an indicator of impairment regarding the recorded balance of goodwill and the definite-lived intangible assets. With regard to
goodwill, we determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying amount of the reporting unit was greater than its fair value, and thus determined
that further evaluation of goodwill for potential impairment was not necessary. We will perform a goodwill impairment analysis over the recorded balance on an
annual basis, or if we determine an indicator of impairment exists. With regards to the definite-lived intangible assets, we determined that there were no events
or changes in circumstances that would indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable, and therefore determined that a test for recoverability was not
required.

The acquisition of Adler qualified as a business combination and as such, we estimated the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of
the closing date. Additionally, we estimated the fair value of contingent consideration given. The fair value measure of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed applied various valuation methods to estimate the value of the intangibles that would provide a fair and reasonable value to a market participant, in
view of the facts available at the time. Each valuation method was analyzed to determine which method would generate the most reasonable estimate of value of
the Company’s intangible assets as of October 26, 2018. Both internal and external factors influencing the value of the intangibles were considered such as
Adler’s financial position, results of operations, historical financial data, future financial expectations, economic conditions, status of the oil and gas industry and
Adler’s position in the industry.

In connection with the execution of the Settlement Agreement, we reviewed our estimates and allocation of the fair value of assets acquired,
consideration transferred, and contingent consideration given in connection with the Transaction. In our judgment, the reduction in the fair value of
the consideration did not have a clear and direct link to the purchase price, and therefore the change in the fair value of the Indemnity Holdback Payment of
approximately $908,000, the change in the fair value of the Earn-Out Payment, of approximately $44,000, and the $300,000 reduction in the amount of the
Seller Subordinated Note, were each recorded as gains within Other Income (Expense) in the accompanying Statements of Operations

The goodwill of approximately $245,000 arising from the acquisition consists largely of the synergies expected be achieved from combining the

operations of Enservco and Adler. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following tables represent the consideration paid to the Seller and the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Consideration paid to Seller:
Cash consideration, including payment to retire Adler debt
Subordinated note, net of discount
Indemnity holdback at fair value
Earnout at fair value
Net purchase price

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

Cash
Accounts receivable, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Property, plant, and equipment
Intangible assets
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Total identifiable net assets
Goodwill
Total identifiable assets acquired

6,206
4,580
873
44
11,703

43
1,317
239
9,664
1,045
(850)
11,458
245
11,703

Below are consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 as though the acquisition of Adler had been completed

on January 1, 2018.

Total revenues
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Income (loss) per common share - basic and diluted

December 31,
2018

$
$
$

55,282
(4,515)
(0.12)

The pro forma results for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes adjustments related to the following purchase accounting and

acquisition related items:

- Elimination of Adler interest expense.
- Additional interest expense related to long-term debt issued to fund the acquisition.
- Adjustment to depreciation expense based on the adjustment of Adler's Property, plant, and equipment to fair value.
- Adjustment to remove certain professional fees from Adler's expenses.
- Adjustment to remove gain on extinguishment of debt from Adler's results.

Subordinated Note

In connection with the Transaction and pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, on October 26, 2018, Enservco issued to the Seller the Seller
Subordinated Note in the original principal amount of $4.8 million in connection with the Settlement Agreement, which was reduced to $4.5 million as discussed
above, and unpaid amounts thereunder beared simple interest at a rate of 8% per annum. Enservco was required to and made principal payments on November
30, 2018 of $800,000, on February 28, 2019 of $200,000, and on April 9, 2019, subject to a 10-day grace period, of all remaining outstanding principal and
interest. The Seller Subordinated Note was guaranteed by Enservco’s subsidiaries and secured by a junior security interest in substantially all assets of
Enservco and its subsidiaries. The Seller Subordinated Note is subject to a subordination agreement by and among Enservco, the Seller, and East West Bank.
On April 19, 2019, Enservco made the final payment to settle the principal balance and accrued interest on the Seller Subordinated Note and has no further
obligations to the Seller.

Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Consent

In connection with the Transaction, on October 26, 2018, Enservco and East West Bank entered into a Second Amendment to Loan and Security
Agreement and Consent (the “Second Amendment to LSA”), which amended the Loan and Security Agreement dated August 10, 2017 by and between
Enservco and East West Bank (the “Loan Agreement”). Pursuant to the Second Amendment to LSA, East West Bank consented to the Transaction and
increased the maximum borrowing limit of the senior secured revolving credit facility provided to Enservco under the Loan Agreement to $37.0 million. Proceeds
of $6.2 million from the increased senior secured revolving credit facility were used in the Transaction to make the cash payments at closing and retire the
indebtedness of Adler. In connection with the Second Amendment to LSA the capital expenditure limitation contained within the Loan Agreement was increased
to $3.0 million from $2.5 million.

On October 26, 2018, in connection with the Second Amendment to LSA, Adler entered into a Joinder Agreement, pursuant to which Adler was joined

as a party to the Loan Agreement.

Note 5 – Intangible Assets

The components of our intangible assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows (in thousands):

Customer relationships
Patents and trademarks
Total intangible assets
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying value

December 31,

2019

2018

626 $
441
1,067
(239)
828 $

626
441
1,067
(34)
1,033

The useful lives of our intangible assets are estimated to be five years. Amortization expense was approximately $205,000 for 2019.

The following table represents the amortization expense for the next five years (in thousands):

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Customer relationships
Intellectual property
Total intangible asset
amortization expense

125 $
90

215 $

125 $
90

215 $

125 $
90

215 $

104 $
79

183 $

-
-

Note 6 – Discontinued Operations

Heat Waves Water Management

During December, 2019, the Heat Waves Water Management business ceased operations for customers. The decision to discontinue HWWM was made
due to its history of net losses, declining revenues, and its failure to generate posiitive operating cash flow. The Company plans on selling off the HWWM assets
during 2020. HWWM was previously reported in the Water Transfer Services segment, however, the Company redefined its segments for the year ended
December 31, 2019, and Water Management Services is no longer a reporting segment.

Dillco

Effective November 1, 2018, the Dillco water hauling business ceased operations for customers. In December 2018, we held an auction for all of the
Dillco fixed assets which resulted in a gain of approximately $129,000. Additionally, we recorded an impairment charge of $130,000 related to land and building
sold subsequent to December 31, 2018.

The following table represents a reconciliation of the carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities disclosed as discontinued operations in

the Balance Sheets:

December 31,
2019

December 31,
2018

Carrying amount of major classes of assets included as part of discontinued
operations:

Accounts receivable, net
Inventories
Property and equipment, net
Receivable from equipment sales
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other assets

Total major classes of assets of the discontinued operations

Carrying amounts of major classes of liabilities included as part of discontinued
operations:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other liabilities

Total liabilities included as part of discontinued operations

175 $
-
1,373
-
12
57
1,617 $

47
59
106 $

978
-
2,376
760
45
-
4,159

341
-
341

The following table represents a reconciliation of the major classes of line items constituting pretax loss of discontinued operations that are

disclosed as discontinued operations in the Statements of Operations:

Revenue
Cost of sales
Sales, general, and administrative expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Other income and expense items that are not major

Pretax loss of discontinued operations related to major classes of pretax profit
Pretax gain on sale at auction
Pretax loss on impairment
Income tax benefit
Total loss on discontinued operations that is presented in the Statements of
Operations

December 31,
2019

December 31,
2018

3,303 $
(4,446)
(23)
(1,177)
11
(2,332)
-
-
-

(2,332) $

6,593
(6,908)
(101)
(1,393)
3
(1,806)
129
(130)
-

(1,807)

Note 7 – Debt

East West Bank Revolving Credit Facility

On August 10, 2017, we entered into the 2017 Credit Agreement, as amended, with East West Bank which provides for a three-year $37 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility"). The 2017 Credit Agreement allows us to borrow up to 85% of our eligible receivables and up to 85% of the
appraised value of our eligible equipment. Under the 2017 Credit Agreement, there are no required principal payments until maturity and we have the option to
pay variable interest rate based on (i) 1-month LIBOR plus a margin of 3.5% or (ii) interest at the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus a margin of 1.75%. Interest
is calculated monthly and paid in arrears. Additionally, the Credit Facility is subject to an unused credit line fee of 0.5% per annum multiplied by the amount by
which total availability exceeds the average monthly balance of the Credit Facility, payable monthly in arrears. The Credit Facility is collateralized by
substantially all of our assets and subject to financial covenants. The outstanding principal loan balance matures on August 10, 2020. Under the terms of the
2017 Credit Agreement, collateral proceeds are collected in bank-controlled lockbox accounts and credited to the Credit Facility within one business day.

As of December 31, 2019, we had an outstanding principal loan balance under the Credit Facility of approximately $34.0 million with a weighted
average interest rates of 5.47% per year for $28.0 million of outstanding LIBOR Rate borrowings and 6.75% per year for the approximately $6.0 million of
outstanding Prime Rate borrowings. As of December 31, 2019, our available cash was approximately $663,000 and we did not have any
availability under the 2017 Credit Agreement, as discussed below. As of June 30, 2019, we had borrowed approximately $753,000 in excess of
the maximum amount available under the Credit Facility and, under the Credit Facility we were required to immediately repay the borrowing
excess. While we paid all of the borrowing excess on July 3, 2019, the non-payment on July 1, 2019 constituted a payment default under the
Credit Agreement. On August 12, 2019, we entered into the Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Waiver with East West Bank
that (i) waived the foregoing default; (ii) provided for slightly higher interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility; and (iii) reduced our
allowable capital expenditures in any fiscal year from $3.0 million to $1.5 million.

Under the 2017 Credit Agreement, we are subject to the following financial covenants:

(1) Maintenance of a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (“FCCR”) of not less than 1.10 to 1.00 at the end of each month, with a build up beginning on

January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017, upon which the ratio is measured on a trailing twelve-month basis;

(2) In periods when the trailing twelve-month FCCR is less than 1.20 to 1.00, we are required to maintain minimum liquidity of $1,500,000 (including

excess availability under the Credit Facility and balance sheet cash).

As of December 31, 2019, we were in violation of two financial covenants contained in the 2017 Credit Agreement and we have failed to pay an
overadvance that has continued through March 2020.

On January 6, 2020, the Company received a notice (the “Default Notice”) from East West Bank regarding events of default of the Company with
respect to the Company's existing Loan and Security Agreement (the “2017 Credit Agreement”) by and between the Company and East West Bank, a California
banking corporation (“East West Bank”). As a result of the events of default, East West Bank may accelerate the $34.0 million outstanding loan balance under
the 2017 Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable. As of the date of this report, East West Bank has not accelerated the outstanding loan balance
amount but it may do so in the future.

The Default Notice indicates that the Company is in default under the 2017 Credit Agreement as a result of its:

•failure to immediately repay a loan overadvance that occurred on October 10, 2019 that has continued through January 6, 2020;

•failure to maintain a minimum liquidity of not less than $1,500,000 for the months ended October 31, 2019 and November 30, 2019; and

•failure to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1:10 to 1:00 for the months ended October 31, 2019 and November 30, 2019.

The Default Notice indicated that although East West Bank was not as of January 6, 2020, exercising its rights and remedies available as a result of the
events of default, it specifically did not waive its rights and remedies resulting from the the events of default and it reserves all other available rights and remedies
under the Credit Agreement, certain other related documents and applicable law.

Amended and Restated Subordinated Loan Agreement

Debt Issuance Costs

We have capitalized certain debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the Credit Facility discussed above and these costs are being amortized to
interest expense over the term of the facility on a straight-line basis. The long-term portion of debt issuance costs of approximately $82,000 and $208,000 is
included in Other Assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. During the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company amortized approximately $140,000 and $105,000, respectively, of these costs to Interest Expense.

Notes Payable

Long-term debt (excluding borrowings under our Credit Facility described above) consists of the following (in thousands):

December 31,
2019

December 31,
2018

Seller Subordinated Note. Interest is at 8%. Matured March 31, 2019

- $

4,000(1)

Subordinated Promissory Note with related party, Interest is at 10%, and is paid quarterly. Matures June 28,
2022

1,000

Subordinated Promissory Note with related party, Interest is at 10%, and is paid quarterly. Matures June 28,
2022

1,000

Subordinated Promissory Note with related party. Interest is at 10%, and is paid quarterly. Matures June 28,
2022

Real Estate Loan for a facility in North Dakota, interest at 5.75%, and monthly principal and interest payment of

$5,255 until October 3, 2028. Collateralized by land and property purchased with the loan.

Vehicle loans for three pickups, interest at 8.59%, monthly principal and interest payments of $3,966, matures
in August 2021

Note payable to the seller of Heat Waves. The note was garnished by the Internal Revenue Service (“ IRS”) in

2009 and is due on demand; paid in annual installments of $36,000 per agreement with the IRS.

Total
Less debt discount
Less current portion

Long-term debt, net of debt discount and current portion

500

218

53
2,845
(119)
(147)
2,579 $

258

113

89
6,460
(167)
(4,149)
2,144

(1) In accordance with the Settlement Agreement discussed in Notes 4 the agreed upon due date was extended to April 10, 2019, subject to a nine-day grace
period. On April 19, 2019, Enservco made the final payment to settle the principal balance and accrued interest on the Seller Subordinated Note and has no
further obligations to the Seller.

Aggregate maturities of debt, (excluding the 2017 Credit Agreement described in above) , are as follows (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total

148
85
2,558
54
-
-
2,845

Note 8 - Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair

value hierarchy (in thousands):

Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)

Fair Value Measurement Using
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Fair Value
Measurement

December 31, 2019

Derivative Instrument

Interest rate swap liability

December 31, 2018

Derivative Instrument asset

Earn-Out Payment liability
Indemnity Holdback Payment liability

Total liabilities which are measured at fair value

- $

- $
-
- $

The following table represents a reconciliation of our Level 3 liability measured at fair value (in thousands):

Fair value of Level 3 instrument at the beginning of the period
Warrant issues
Settlements
Change in fair value of warrant liability
Add: Liabilities related to acquisition of Adler
Less: Settlement of Adler liability

Fair value of Level 3 instrument at the end of period

23 $

75 $

- $
-
-

- $

44 $
887
931

44
887
931

Year Ended December 31,
2018
2019

931
-
-
-
-
(931)
- $

831
-
(1,371)
540
931
-
931

Derivative Instruments

The fair value of the interest rate swap is estimated using a discounted cash flow model. Such models involve using market-based observable inputs,
including interest rate curves. We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our nonperformance risk and respective counterparty’s
nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements, which we have concluded are not material to the valuation. Due to the interest rate swaps being unique
and not actively traded, the fair value is classified as Level 2.

The fair value of the Indemnity Holdback Payment liability was estimated based on the present value using a risk-adjusted interest rate of 9.5%. The
fair value of the Earn-Out Payment liability was estimated using a financial projection with a risk-adjusted interest rate of 9.5%.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an
ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and interest approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such items. The
carrying value of the Company’s credit agreements are carried at cost which are approximately the fair value of the debt as the related interest rate are at the
terms that approximate rates currently available to the Company.

The Company did not have any transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the

years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Note 9 – Income Taxes

The income tax provision (benefit) from operations consists of the following (in thousands):

Current

Federal
State

Total Current

Deferred
Federal
State

Total Deferred

Total Income Tax Benefit

Reduction of U.S. federal corporate tax rate

December 31,

2019

2018

- $
32
32

-
-
-
32 $

-
32
32

-
-
-
32

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”).
The Tax Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. In addition, for tax years beginning after January 1, 2018, net operating
losses can offset only 80% of taxable income in any given year. Furthermore, net operating losses can no longer be carried back, they must be carried forward.
The 20-year carryforward period has been replaced with an indefinite carryforward period.

A reconciliation of computed income taxes by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% to income (loss) from operations before taxes to the

provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2019

2018

Computed income taxes at 21% for 2019 and 2018, respectively

(1,118) $

(1,047)

Increase in income taxes resulting from:

State and local income taxes, net of federal impact
Change in valuation allowance
Stock-based compensation
Other

(154)
1,298
14
(8)

(Expense) Benefit for income taxes

32 $

(142)
1,373
(204)
52

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are

deductible, management recorded a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax assets to zero.

We have a requirement of reporting of taxes based on tax positions which meet a more likely than not standard and which are measured at the amount
that is more likely than not to be realized. Differences between financial and tax reporting which do not meet this threshold are required to be recorded as
unrecognized tax benefits. This standard also provides guidance on the presentation of tax matters and the recognition of potential IRS interest and penalties. As
of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company does not have an unrecognized tax liability.

The Company has approximately $27.5 million of net operating losses that will begin to expire in the year 2035.

The components of deferred income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows (in thousands):

Deferred tax assets

Reserves and accruals
Amortization
Capital losses and other
Non-qualified stock option expense
Loss Carryforwards

Total deferred tax assets

Valuation allowance

Net deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities

Depreciation

Total deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

December 31,

2019

2018

1,040 $
(12)
11
182
6,897
8,118
(4,951)
3,167

(3,167)
(3,167)

- $

476
(11)
1
165
5,901
6,532
(3,081)
3,451

(3,451)
(3,451)

The Company uses significant judgment in forming conclusions regarding the recoverability of its deferred tax assets and evaluates all available positive
and negative evidence to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. To the extent recovery does not appear likely, a
valuation allowance must be recorded. The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $4.9 million and $3.1 million as of December 31, 2019 a n d 2018,
respectively.

It is possible that the relative weight of positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax assets may change, which could result in
a material increase or decrease in the Company’s valuation allowance. Such a change could result in a material increase or decrease to income tax expense in
the period the assessment was made.

The Company classifies penalty and interest expense related to income tax liabilities as an other ex pense. The Company did not incur any interest and

penalties for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The Company files tax re turns in the United States, in various states including Colorado, Kansas, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The
Company’s United States federal income tax filings for tax years 2016 through 2019 remain open to examination. In general, the Company’s various state tax
filings remain open for tax years 2015 to 2019.

Note 10 – Stockholders Equity

Warrants

In June 2016, the Company granted a principal of the Company’s investor relations firm warrants to acquire 30,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock in connection with a reduction of the firm's ongoing monthly cash service fees. The warrants had a grant-date fair value of $0.36 per share and vested over
a one-year period, 15,000 on December 21, 2016 and 15,000 on June 21, 2017. As of December 31, 2019, all of these warrants remain outstanding and are
exercisable until June 21, 2021 at $0.70 per share.

In June 2017, in connection with a subordinated loan agreement, the Company granted Cross River two five-year warrants to buy an aggregate total of
1,612,902 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.31 per share, the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the
20-day period ended May 11, 2017. The warrants had a grant-date fair value of $0.19 per share and vested in full on June 28, 2017. On June 29, 2018 Cross
River exercised both warrants and acquired 1,612,902 shares of our $0.005 par value common stock. Proceeds from the exercise of the warrants in the amount
of $500,000 were used to reduce the subordinated debt balance. The warrants exercised had a total intrinsic value of approximately $1.4 million at the time of
exercise.

On November 11, 2019, in connection with a subordinated loan agreement, the Company granted Cross River one five year warrant to buy an
aggregate total of 625,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The warrants had a grant-date fair value $0.16 and
were fully vested upon issuance and remain outstanding and exercisable until November 11, 2024.

A summary of warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

Warrants

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2018

Issued
Exercised
Forfeited/Cancelled

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

Issued
Exercised
Forfeited/Cancelled

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

Exercisable at December 31, 2019

1,642,903 $
-
(1,612,903)
-
30,000 $
625,000
-
-
655,000 $

655,000 $

0.32
-
0.31
-
0.70
0.20
-
-
0.22

0.22

4.5 $
-
-
-
2.5 $
4.9
-
-
4.7 $

4.7 $

539
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Note 11 – Stock Options and Restricted Stock

Stock Options

O n July 27, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The aggregate number of shares of
common stock that could be granted under the 2010 Plan was reset at the beginning of each year based on 15% of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding. As such, on January 1, 2016 the number of shares of common stock available under the 2010 Plan was reset to 5,719,069 shares based upon
38,127,129 shares outstanding on that date. Options were typically granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair value of the Company's common
stock at the date of grant with a vesting schedule of one to three years and a contractual term of 5 years. As discussed below, the 2010 Plan has been replaced
by a new stock option plan and no additional stock option grants will be granted under the 2010 Plan. As of December 31, 2019, there were options to purchase
474,666 shares outstanding under the 2010 Plan.

On July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the adoption of the Enservco Corporation 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”),
which was approved by the stockholders on September 29, 2016. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be granted under the 2016 Plan
is 8,000,000 shares plus authorized and unissued shares from the 2010 Plan totaling 2,391,711 for a total reserve of 10,391,711 shares. As of December 31,
2019, there were options to purchase 1,470,667 shares and we had granted restricted stock shares of 2,006,333 that remained outstanding under the 2016
Plan.

A summary of the range of assumptions used to value stock options granted for the year ended December 31, 2017 are as follows:

Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Expected term (in years)

For the Year Ended
December 31,
2017

89
1.4
-
3.0

-
–
-
–

93%
1.5%
-
3.5

During the year ended December 31, 2019, no options were granted or exercised. During the year ended December 31, 2018, no stock options were

granted. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 1,230,002 options were exercised resulting in the issuance of 663,938 shares.

The following is a summary of stock option activity for all equity plans for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Outstanding at January 1, 2018

Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or Expired

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or Expired

Outstanding at December 31, 2019
Vested at December 31, 2019
Exercisable at December 31, 2019

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)

3.46 $

1,007

-
-

2.54 $
-
-
-
1.95 $
1.94 $
1.94 $

-
-

93
-
-
-
-
-
-

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

0.71
,
0.44
0.71

0.85
-
-
1.78
0.55
0.56
0.56

4,814,434 $
-
(1,230,002)
(1,039,767)

2,544,665 $
-
-
(599,332)
1,945,333 $
1,892,332 $
1,892,332 $

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the estimated fair value of the Company ’s
common stock and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had they exercised
their options on December 31, 2019.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recog nized stock-based compensation costs for stock options of approximately
$77, 0 0 0 a n d $241,000, respectively, in sales, general and administrative expenses. The Company currently expects all outstanding options to vest.
Compensation cost is revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of options vested due to service is likely to differ from previous
estimates.

A summary of the status of non-vested shares underlying the options are presented below:

Non-vested at January 1, 2018

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2018

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2019

Number of
Shares

Weighted-
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value

2,531,599 $
-
(1,284,666)
(653,100)
593,833 $
-
(485,999)
(54,833)
53,001 $

0.24
-
0.27
0.22
0.20
-
0.19
0.22
0.22

As of December 31, 2019, there was approximately $4,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested shares under the

Company's stock option plans which will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average period of 0.42 years.

Restricted Stock

Restricted shares issued pursuant to restricted stock awards under the 2016 Stock Plan are restricted as to sale or disposition. These restrictions lapse
periodically generally over a period of three years. Restrictions may also lapse for early retirement and other conditions in accordance with our established
policies. Upon termination of employment, shares on which restrictions have not lapsed must be returned to us, resulting in restricted stock forfeitures. The fair
market value on the date of the grant of the stock with a service condition is amortized and charged to income on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for the entire award. The fair market value on the date of the grant of the stock with a performance condition shall be accrued and recognized when it
becomes probable that the performance condition will be achieved. Restricted shares that contain a market condition are amortized and charged over the life of
the award.

A summary of the restricted stock activity is presented below:

Restricted shares at January 1, 2018

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Restricted shares at December 31, 2018

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Restricted shares at December 31, 2019

Number of
Shares

Weighted
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value

-
1,042,500
(58,333)
(147,500)
836,667
1,473,000
(43,334)
(260,000)
2,006,333

-
1.07
1.11
0.72
0.98
0.27
1.28
1.12
0.55

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized stock-based compensation costs for restricted stock of approximately
$199,000 and $153,000 in sales, general, and administrative expenses. Compensation cost is revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number
of restricted stock vested due to service is likely to differ from previous estimates.

The following table sets forth the weighted average outstanding of potentially dilutive instruments for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Stock options
Warrants
Weighted average

Year Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2,146,409
113,904
2,260,313

3,199,877
668,071
3,867,948

Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

On January 1, 2019, we adopted ASC 842, Leases. Results for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2019 are presented in accordance with ASC 842,
while prior period amounts are reported in accordance with ASC 840. On January 1, 2019, we recognized $2.4 million in right-of-use assets and $2.4 million in
lease liabilities, representing the present value of minimum payment obligations associated with leased facilities and certain equipment with non-cancellable
lease terms in excess of one year. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we entered into several finance leases related to equipment. We recognized
approximately $845,000 in right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. We made a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of approximately $98,000 at
January 1, 2019.

Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date. Operating lease liabilities represent the present value of lease
payments not yet paid. Operating lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset and are based upon the operating lease liabilities adjusted for
prepayments or accrued lease payments, initial direct costs, lease incentives, and impairment of operating lease assets. To determine the present value of lease
payments not yet paid, the Company uses the weighted average interest rate on its Credit Facility. Long-term leases typically contain rent escalations over the
lease term. The Company recognizes expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company has elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all applicable classes of underlying assets. Short-term disclosures include only
those leases with a term greater than one month and 12 months or less, and expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leases with an
initial term of 12 months or less, that do not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that we are reasonably certain to exercise, are not recorded on
the balance sheet.

The Company elected the expedient to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component for our entire population of operating lease

assets.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company leases facilities and certain equipment under lease commitments that expire through June 2026. Future

minimum lease commitments for these operating lease commitments are as follows (in thousands):

Twelve Months Ending December 31,

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter

Impact of discounting
Discounted value of lease obligations

Operating
Leases

Financing
Leases

1,011 $
964
774
641
473
534
4,397
(16)
4,381 $

259
232
75
-
-
-
566
(100)
466

The following table summarizes the components of our gross operating lease costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

Operating lease expense:
Current lease cost
Long-term lease cost
Total operating lease cost
Finance lease expense:
Amortization of right-of-use assets
Interest on lease liabilities
Total lease cost

Our weighted-average lease term and discount rate used during the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows:

Operating
Weighted-average lease term (years)
Weighted-average discount rate
Financing
Weighted-average lease term (years)
Weighted-average discount rate

Year Ended
December 31,
2019

954
411
1,365

219
28
247

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

4.60
6.08%

2.16
6.10%

Self-Insurance

In June 2015, the Company became self-insured under its Employee Group Medical Plan, and currently is responsible to pay the first $50,000 in
medical costs per individual participant for claims incurred in the calendar year up to a maximum of approximately $1.8 million per year in the aggregate based
on enrollment. The Company had an accrued liability of approximately $68,000 and $60,000 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, for
insurance claims that it anticipates paying in the future related to claims that occurred prior to December 31, 2019.

Effective April 1, 2015, the Company had entered into a workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance policy with a term through March 31,
2018. Under the terms of the policy, the Company was required to pay premiums in addition to a portion of the cost of any claims made by our employees, up to
a maximum of approximately $1.8 million over the term of the policy (an amount that was variable with changes in annualized compensation amounts). As of
December 31, 2019, a former employee of ours had an open claim relating to injuries sustained while in the course of employment, and the projected maximum
cost of the policy as determined by the insurance carrier included estimated claim costs that have not yet been paid or incurred in connection with the claim.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, our insurance carrier formally denied the workers' compensation claim and has moved to close the claim entirely.
Per the terms of our insurance policy, through December 31, 2018, we had paid in approximately $1.8 million of the projected maximum plan cost of $1.8
million, and had recorded approximately $1.6 million as expense over the term of the policy. We recorded the remaining approximately $189,000 in payments
made under the policy as a long-term asset, which we expect will either be recorded as expense in future periods, or refunded to us by the insurance carrier,
depending on the outcome of the individual claim described above, and the final cost of any additional open claims incurred under the policy. As of December
31, 2019, we believe we have paid all amounts contractually due under the policy. Effective April 1, 2018, we entered into a new workers’ compensation policy
with a fixed premium amount determined annually, and therefore are no longer partially self-insured for workers' compensation and employer's liability.

Litigation

Note 13- Segment Reporting

In 2019 we reorganized our business segments to align with how the oil and gas industry and our management team evaluates the business. Enservco’s
reportable business segments are Production Services and Completion Services. These segments have been selected based on management’s resource
allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding the Company.

The following is a description of the segments.

Production Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of hot oil trucks and acidizing units to provide maintenance services to the domestic oil and gas
industry. These services include hot oil services and acidizing services.

Completion Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of frac water heating units to provide frac water heating services to the domestic oil and gas industry.

Unallocated and other includes general overhead expenses and assets associated with managing all reportable operating segments which have not
been allocated to a specific segment.

The following tables set forth certain financial information with respect to Enservco ’s reportable segments (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 2019:

Revenues
Cost of Revenue
Segment Profit

Depreciation and Amortization

Capital Expenditures

Identifiable assets (1)

Year Ended December 31, 2018:

Revenues
Cost of Revenue
Segment Profit

Depreciation and Amortization

Capital Expenditures (Excluding Acquisitions)

Identifiable assets (1)

Production
Services

Completion
Services

Unallocated
& Other

Total

14,704
13,575
1,129

28,322
21,032
7,290

2,648

2,922

399

419

-
-
-

122

373

43,026
34,607
8,419

5,692

1,191

18,233

19,121

1,420

38,774

14,538
12,864
1,674

28,222
20,614
7,608

2,308

2,550

460

524

-
-
-

42,760
33,478
9,282

4,871

1,058

20,229

21,213

428

41,870

(1)

Identifiable assets is calculated by summing the balances of accounts receivable, net; inventories; property and equipment, net; and other assets.

The following table reconcile s the segment profits reported above to the loss from operations reported in the consolidated statements of operations (in

thousands):

Segment profit
Sales, general and administrative expenses
Patent litigation defense costs
Severance and transition costs
Gain (loss) from disposal of equipment
Impairment
Depreciation and amortization
Loss from Operations

Geographic Areas:

December 31,
2019

December 31,
2018

8,419 $
(6,153)
(10)
(83)
73
(127)
(5,692)
(3,573) $

9,282
(5,193)
(80)
(633)
104
-
(4,871)
(1,391)

The Company only does business in the United States, in what it believes are three geographically diverse regions. The following table sets forth
revenue from operations for the Company’s three geographic regions during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in
thousands):

BY GEOGRAPHY:
Production Services:

Rocky Mountain Region (1)
Central USA Region (2)
Eastern USA Region (3)

Total Production Services

Completion Services:

Rocky Mountain Region (1)
Central USA Region (2)
Eastern USA Region (3)

Total Completion Services

Total Revenues

For the Year Ended
December 31,

2019

2018

6,515 $
7,449
740
14,704

21,535
3,223
3,564
28,322
43,026 $

6,205
7,560
773
14,538

21,393
3,390
3,439
28,222
42,760

Notes to tables:
(1) Includes the D-J Basin/Niobrara field (northeastern Colorado and southeastern Wyoming), the San Juan Basin (southeastern Colorado and northeastern
New Mexico), the Powder River and Green River Basins (northeastern and southwestern Wyoming), the Bakken area (western North Dakota and
eastern Montana).

(2) Includes the Scoop/Stack Shale in Oklahoma and the Eagle Ford Shale - in Texas.
(3) Consists of the southern region of the Marcellus Shale formation (southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia) and the Utica Shale formation

(eastern Ohio).

Note 14- Subsequent Events

In early March 2020, crude oil prices declined significantly in response to worldwide oil demand concerns due to the economic impacts of COVID-19,
which has also negatively impacted numerous other industries, domestic and international. These trends, including a potential economic downturn, and any
potential resulting direct and indirect negative impact to the Company, cannot be determined, but are expected to have a material prospective impact to the
Company’s operations, cash flows and liquidity.

On March 16, 2020, Heat Wave’s Hot Oil’s Oklahoma location was closed down due to: Unfavorable weather in Oklahoma during the fourth quarter of

2019 and the first quarter of 2020, profitability concerns and future demand uncertainty.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2019, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer). Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information re quired to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Beginning January 1, 2019, we adopted ASC 842 "Leases". Although the adoption of the new accounting standard did not have a material impact on
our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, we implemented changes to our processes
related to accounting for leases and related internal controls. These changes included the development of new policies related to the new leasing framework,
training, ongoing contract review requirements, and gathering of information to comply with disclosure requirements.

There has been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item will be included under the headings "Board of Directors," "Executive Officers," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance," and "Corporate Governance" in our definitive proxy statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required
information is incorporated therein.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item will be included under the heading "Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers" in our definitive proxy statement
for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item will be included under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in our definitive
proxy statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item will be included under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in our definitive proxy statement for
our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item will be included under the heading "Principal Accountant Fees and Services" in our definitive proxy statement for our
2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

100

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

Exhibit
No.

Title

PART IV.

3.01
3.02
3.03
4.1
10.01
10.02
10.03
10.04
10.05
10.06
10.07
10.08
10.09
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (1)
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2)
Amended and Restated Bylaws. (3)
Description of Securities. Filed herewith.
2016 Stock Incentive Plan (4)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Ian Dickinson. (5)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Dustin Bradford (8)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Kevin Kersting (9)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Marjorie A. Hargrave (16)
Loan and Security Agreement with East West Bank, a California banking corporation.
Form of Indemnification Agreement. (6)
Subordinated Loan Agreement(10)
Subordinated Promissory Note – $1.0 Million(10)
Subordinated Promissory Note – $1.5 Million (10)
Warrant – 645,161 Shares (10)
Warrant – 967,741 Shares (10)
Executive Severance Agreement dated January 8, 2018, by and between Tucker Franciscus and the Company
Executive Severance Agreement dated April 27, 2018, by and between Austin Peitz and the Company
Executive Severance and Consulting Agreement effective July 24, 2019, by and between Dustin Bradford and the Company
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Waiver, dated November 20, 2017. (13)
Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated October 26, 2018. (18)
Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated August 12, 2019. (17)
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement to purchase Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC. (19)
Seller Subordinated Promissory Note. (18)

(12)

(11)

(16)

101

11.1
14.1
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1

32.2

Statement of Computation of per share earnings. Filed herewith. (contained in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Whistleblower Policy. (7)
Subsidiaries of Enservco Corporation. Filed herewith.
Consent of Plante & Moran, PLLC
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Principal Executive Officer). Filed herewith.
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Principal Financial Officer). Filed herewith.
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). Filed

herewith.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). Filed

herewith.

101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.LAB
101.PRE
101.DEF

XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Schema Document
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
XBRL Label Linkbase Document
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 2010, and filed on January 4, 2011.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 2014, and filed on June 25, 2014.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2010, and filed on July 28, 2010.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A and filed on August 16, 2016.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 5, 2017 and filed May 11, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.07 to the Company ’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2013 and filed on March 18, 2014.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2010, and filed on July 28, 2010.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2018 and filed on April 27, 2018.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 21, 2018 and filed on May 22, 2018.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 28, 2017, and filed on July 3, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 8, 2018 and filed on January 9, 2018.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 27, 2018 and filed on April 30, 2018.

102

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)

Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2017, and filed on November 21, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 12, 2017, and filed on December 18, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 5, 2017, and filed on May 11, 2017.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2019, and filed on July 24, 2019.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on From 10-Q dated June 30, 2019 and filed on August 14, 2018.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on From 8-K dated October 26, 2018 and filed on November 1, 2018.
Incorporated by reference from the Company ’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2016, and filed on December 7, 2016.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

103

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the

SIGNATURES

undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

March 20, 2020

ENSERVCO CORPORATION,
a Delaware Corporation

/s/ Ian Dickinson
Chief Executive officer

(Power of Attorney)

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Ian Dickinson and Dustin Bradford his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
each acting along, with full power of stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2019, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the

Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Date

Name and Title

Signature

March 20, 2020

Ian Dickinson
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

/s/ Ian Dickinson

Marjorie Hargrave
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)

/s/ Marjorie Hargrave

Richard A. Murphy
Chairman of the Board and Director

/s/ Richard A. Murphy

Keith J. Behrens
Director

Robert S. Herlin
Director

William A. Jolly
Director

Christopher Haymons
Director

/s/ Keith J. Behrens

/s/ Robert S. Herlin

/s/ William A. Jolly

/s/ Christopher Haymons

104

Description of the Registrant’s Securities

Exhibit 4.1

The following summary of the Registrant’s equity securities is based on and qualified by the Registrant’s Second Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws. For a complete
description of the terms and provisions of the Registrant’s equity securities, refer to the Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws, both of which are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

General

The authorized capital stock of the Registrant consists of 110,000,000 shares, which are be divided into two classes,
consisting of 100,000,000 shares of common stock (“Common Stock”) and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”),
each with $0.005 par value per share.

Description of Common Stock

The holders of outstanding shares of Common Stock have the right to vote on all questions to the exclusion of all other
stockholders, each holder of record of Common Stock being entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock standing in the
name of the stockholder on the books of the Registrant, except as may be provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, in a
Preferred Stock designation, or as required by law.

Description of Preferred Stock

Under the Certificate of Incorporation, the board of directors of the Registrant is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of
Preferred Stock, of which none are issued and outstanding as of the date hereof. Also, the board of directors of the Registrant,
without stockholder approval, may determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of
those shares. If the board of directors of the Registrant causes shares of Preferred Stock to be issued, the rights of the holders of
the Common Stock would likely be subordinate to those of holders of Preferred Stock and therefore could be adversely affected.

Description of Common Stock Incentives

The Registrant’s board of directors and stockholders have approved its 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”), which replaced
the Registrant’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the 2016 Plan, the plan administrator may make grants of cash and equity
awards and may determine the recipients, numbers and types of awards to be granted, and the terms and conditions of the awards,
including the period of their exercisability and vesting.

The aggregate number of shares of the Common Stock reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan may not exceed 10,391,711
shares through September 29, 2026 (the stated life of the 2016 plan). As of December 31, 2019, there were options to purchase
1,470,667 shares outstanding, 926,666 options had been exercised pursuant to the 2016 Plan, and 2,006,333 Restricted Stock
Award shares outstanding under the 2016 Plan in respect of 2,006,333 shares of Common Stock.

The 2016 Plan permits the granting of:

• Stock options (including both incentive and non-qualified stock options);
• Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”);
• Restricted stock and restricted stock units;
• Performance awards of cash, stock, other securities or property;
• Other stock grants; and
• Other stock-based awards.

Unless sooner discontinued or terminated by the board of directors of the Registrant, the 2016 Plan will expire on September 29,
2026. No awards may be made after that date. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in an applicable award agreement,
any award granted under the 2016 Plan prior to expiration extends beyond the expiration of the 2016 Plan through the award’s
normal expiration date.

Without the approval of the Registrant’s stockholders, the committee of the 2016 Plan will not re-price, adjust or amend the
exercise price of any options or the grant price of any SAR previously awarded, except in connection with a stock dividend or other
distribution, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits, or potential benefits intended to be provided under the 2016
Plan.

Exhibit 21.1

ENSERVCO CORPORATION
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
December 31, 2019

Name

State of Formation

Ownership

Dillco Fluid Service, Inc.

Heat Waves Hot Oil Service LLC

Heat Waves Water Management LLC

HE Services, LLC

Adler Hot Oil Service, LLC

Kansas

Colorado

100% by Enservco

Nevada

100% by Heat Waves

Delaware

100% by Enservco

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Exhibit 23.1

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Enservco Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-222636 and 333-188156)
of our report dated March 19, 2020 relating to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

Denver, CO
March 19, 2020

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Exhibit 31.1

I, Ian Dickinson, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Enservco Corporation;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant ’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

(b)

March 20, 2020

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant
over financial reporting.

’s internal control

/s/ Ian Dickinson
Ian Dickinson, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Exhibit 31.2

I, Marjorie Hargrave, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Enservco Corporation;

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

March 20, 2020

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant
over financial reporting.

’s internal control

/s/ Marjorie Hargrave
Marjorie Hargrave, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Enservco Corporation (the “ Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ian Dickinson, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

(2)

March 20, 2020

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material res pects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Ian Dickinson
Ian Dickinson, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Enservco Corporation (the “ Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marjorie Hargrave, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

(2)

March 20, 2020

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Marjorie Hargrave
Marjorie Hargrave, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer