Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Steel / Ferrexpo

Ferrexpo

fxpo · LSE Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker fxpo
Exchange LSE
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Steel
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2023 Annual Report · Ferrexpo
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
D E T E R M I N E D

Ferrexpo plc
Annual Report & Accounts 2023

Contents

We are determined to 
protect our people and 
our assets so that we 
may continue to operate 
and contribute positively 
to Ukrainian society and 
the economy. 

As a leading European 
supplier of premium iron 
ore pellets we are enabling 
the transition to green steel. 
Our products are important 
to Ukraine and to customers 
around the world. 

Strategic Report 

01

Executive Chair’s Statement 
Chief Financial Officer’s Statement 
Operating during a time of war 
Our Business 
  Business Model 
  Value Proposition 
  Strategic Framework 
  KPIs 
Operational Review 
Market Review 
Financial Review 
Responsible Business Review

Introduction 

  Safety 
  Net Zero Pathway 
  Double Materiality Assessment 
  Life Cycle Assessment 
  TCFD Disclosures 
  Diversity, Equity and Inclusion 
  Governance 
Non-Financial Information Statement 
Stakeholder Engagement – Section 172 
Risk Management 
Principal Risks 
Viability Statement 

02
04
06

08
10
12
14
18
22
26

32
34
36
38
42
43
60
62
63
64
72
74
91

Corporate Governance 

Financial Statements 

Additional Disclosures 
Alternative Performance Measures 
Glossary 

93

158

235
236
238

WE ARE DETERMINED

Look out for our 
operational Q&As

Throughout the report this year,  
you will find Q&As from our colleagues 
across different areas of our business 
discussing what it is like operating during  
a time of war.

References to Ferrexpo plc 
For references to Ferrexpo plc in this report see glossary.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
01

Executive 
Chair and CFO 
statements 

Operating 
during a time 
of war 

02

Operational 
Review

06

Market 
Review

18

22

Financial 
Review

Responsible 
business

26

32

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS02

Executive Chair’s Statement

Ferrexpo has demonstrated a 
strong performance during a 
time of war and we should be 
proud of our achievements. 
In the face of extraordinary 
circumstances, we have 
continued to produce, export, 
and preserve cash.

Dear Shareholder
The challenges that Ferrexpo faced in 
2023 cannot be understated. After two 
years of war in Ukraine, our people and our 
business continue to be severely affected. 

Our strategy to move early and right-size our 
business, so that we are more responsive 
to ever changing circumstances, is working. 
During the year, we have worked tirelessly 
to protect our people, preserve the integrity 
of our assets, and contribute to local society 
and the national economy. In the face of 
such extraordinary circumstances, we 
have continued to produce and export our 
products and preserve cash. I believe that 
the company has performed exceptionally 
well and despite the challenges we 
should be proud of our achievements.

War
This announcement covers the financial year 
2023, the second year of war since Russia 
commenced its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 
February 2022 and at the time of the publication 
of this report it is already the third year. 

Beyond the challenges in Ukraine, it would 
appear that the wider world is entering a 
new era of geopolitical uncertainty. Old 
conflicts have reignited, new ones are 
emerging, and autocratic leaders and their 
nationalist agendas are prevailing in and 
across many countries and regions.

Against this increasingly volatile and complex 
backdrop, it is perhaps inevitable, regrettably, 
that when it comes to Ukraine, a certain level 
of ‘war weariness’ is starting to appear.

Weariness, however, is not an option for the 
people of Ukraine who at no point have lost 
sight of what is at stake – the very existence 
of the Ukrainian state. It is my observation 
that the Ukrainian identity has strengthened 
over this period, which has bolstered the 
resilience and commitment of Ukrainians 
– who remain as determined as ever.

Reconstruction
Today, even during a time of war, Ukraine 
is already considering what sort of state it 
wants to be when the war is over, and how 
to reconstruct its political system, economy 
and society as a whole. In December 2023, 
this thinking took a decisive direction when 
the EU opened member accession talks with 
Ukraine. Setting a path for the integration of 
Ukraine into the EU is the right thing, and one 
in which Ferrexpo can play a critical role.

As Ukraine embarks on the task of economic 
reconstruction, government and business 
must work together to agree on the steps 
needed to create an investment environment 
that will help rebuild Ukraine as quickly 
as possible and shorten the path to EU 
membership. This includes upholding the 
rule of law, creating a level playing field for 
business and gaining the trust of a new set 
of investors who see prospects for rapid, 
sustained growth in the country after the 
war. It also means rooting out much of the 
corruption that is endemic in Ukraine.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

03

Limitations on our logistics corridors have 
again constrained our ability to export, 
which forced us to limit production levels. 
We have been able to operate one, sometimes 
two, of our four pellet lines to match the 
reduced export capacity available to us. 
The lack of access to Black Sea export 
routes, in particular, sharply reduced 
opportunities to export product volumes 
to the Middle East and Asia, however, this 
has started to ease since early 2024.

Thanks
There were some Board changes during the 
year. Ann-Christin Andersen and Graeme 
Dacomb resigned from the Board and I would 
like to express my thanks to both. I would 
also like to extend my thanks to Jim North 
who stepped down as CEO in April 2023. 
I had the pleasure over eight years to observe 
the tremendous positive impact Jim had on 
modernising and expanding Ferrexpo. Jim 
is both a pragmatic realist and a visionary, 
and he possesses the rare balance of being 
technically brilliant and a skilful diplomat. The 
war impeded his objectives to grow Ferrexpo 
towards an annual net-zero production of 
24 million tonnes, but he has left us a road 
map that we will resume when the time is right.

Following Jim’s departure I assumed 
responsibility as interim Executive Chair, 
leading the business with an experienced 
Executive management team whom in 
2024 will celebrate working at Ferrexpo for 
a collective 100 years, and in the industry 
for 150 years. As I said in last year’s report 
when I was Non-executive Chair, strong 
governance is essential now more than ever, 
and whilst my interim role as an Executive 
Chair is admittedly a combined role, we do 
not believe now is the right time to make 
any significant management changes.

Finally, I wish to thank each and every 
one of our employees as well as our local 
communities for the bravery and resolve 
they have continued to show in the face 
of such fierce adversity and express my 
gratitude to all those associated with 
Ferrexpo for their contribution and continued 
support over the past 12 months.

Lucio Genovese
Executive Chair, Ferrexpo plc

Ferrexpo holds a pivotal position in shaping 
Ukraine’s future. As a UK-based public 
limited company, we uphold governance 
standards that instil confidence in international 
investors, safeguarding their investments. Our 
commitment extends beyond financial security; 
we aim to bolster and expand our capabilities 
to drive growth in the Ukrainian economy. 
With a focus on producing premium products 
essential for steel producers’ decarbonisation 
efforts, especially within Europe, we are poised 
to facilitate the growth of sustainable trade 
between Ukraine and the EU. Our dedication 
to this cause marks our distinctive role in 
Ukraine’s reconstruction. Ferrexpo is uniquely 
positioned to lead the charge towards a 
prosperous and sustainable future for Ukraine.

People
Our future hinges upon our people – our 
steadfast workforce, their families, and the 
communities we serve. This commitment 
unequivocally extends to those members of 
our workforce who are bravely serving in the 
Armed Forces of Ukraine. We honour their 
sacrifice and eagerly anticipate their return 
to the roles we have preserved for them.

Ferrexpo stands out for its unparalleled 
combination of large-scale and top-tier 
assets within our industry. However, it is 
the unwavering dedication of our workforce 
that truly fuels the productivity of these 
assets. So, at this point, I’d like to express 
our heartfelt gratitude to each and every 
member of our team for their tireless 
efforts and unwavering determination.

I am deeply saddened that 19 of our 
colleagues were killed serving in the Armed 
Forces of Ukraine in 2023, bringing the total to 
35 since February 2022. We bow for each of 
these brave souls. May they rest in peace and 
be remembered for their extraordinary courage 
and sacrifice. At the date of this report, 641 
of our colleagues are serving in the armed 
forces, equal to 9% of our total workforce. 

Safety and wellbeing
Throughout the year, Ukraine has continued to 
face regular attacks from Russia, influencing 
how we ensure the wellbeing of our people, 
who remain our primary concern. We are 
committed to ensuring their safety and offering 
comprehensive physical and psychological 
support during these challenging times. 
Examples of this include providing protective 
clothing for those serving in the armed forces, 
building bomb shelters for those working in 
industrial functions, the provision of meals 
for those on longer shifts, permitting those in 
administrative functions to work from home 
and offering child care in safe bomb shelters. 
We continue to provide broader assistance 
through our humanitarian aid programmes, 
which have provided housing, food and 

medicine, funded the donation of equipment, 
and support programmes and initiatives. 

Safety must be thought of in new and broader 
terms. For example, as the war evolves we 
are starting to see people return from the 
armed forces. The rehabilitation of veterans 
into the workforce is challenging, especially 
for those with physical and mental injuries. 
We have helped with physical rehabilitation, 
including prosthetics, and emotional 
trauma. This extends to support for family 
members too. It is our role to foresee and 
adapt to these changes, so that we can 
continue to keep our people as safe as 
possible and support their wellbeing.

Skills
The enlisting of such a large amount of 
our Ukrainian workforce, particularly those 
with technical skills, has had an inevitable 
impact on our human and operational 
capacity. The workforce that remained 
on site have proven remarkably agile 
and flexible, ensuring the continuity of all 
activities. Our training centres have risen to 
the challenge to help people develop new 
skills, including internally displaced people 
joining our workforce, and for others learning 
to upskill and cross-skill, to provide the 
optimum flexibility across our workforce. 

The determination of our employees has 
proven invaluable in overcoming some 
disruptions to vital infrastructure, an 
inevitable eventuality of Russia’s regular 
attacks on Ukraine. While we did suffer 
some downtime as a result of damage to 
electricity transformers, roads and bridges, 
our speedy repairs, sometimes working with 
various authorities has meant that operational 
disruptions were mostly short lived.

Assets and logistics
Thanks to the resilience of our employees 
the Company’s assets remain intact 
and operational. Together, we have 
continued to seek to preserve Ferrexpo’s 
underlying value as well as the Company’s 
significance for the Ukrainian economy.

During the year, we continued to invest in 
our assets, such as the construction and 
commissioning of the press filtration complex, 
to improve the quality of our products. 
Resources have been devoted to undertaking 
desktop reviews and engineering analysis. 
By completing these studies at a time of 
considerable constraint, we will not only 
be in a far better position to recommission 
production in the future, but also have more 
clarity when we reinitiate upgrade and 
expansion projects. We will continue with 
this advanced preparatory work into 2024.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS04

Chief Financial Officer’s Statement

The challenges of the last year have 
accelerated our learning and adoption 
to make us more agile and responsive 
to ever changing circumstances. 
The cohesion shown by our employees 
across the business demonstrates a team 
that is unified and working together to 
overcome any challenges that they face.

Dear Stakeholders,
As we reflect on 2023, another year blighted 
by Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, 
I am proud that we are able to report 
operating and financial results that reflect 
the determination of our people in these 
difficult times. The cohesion shown by our 
employees across the various departments 
of the business demonstrates a team that is 
unified and working together to overcome any 
challenge they face. This fortitude has made 
us stronger and allows us to understand what 
our people and operations are capable of.

While the challenges of the past year 
have been formidable, they have also 
accelerated our learning and adaptation, 
making us more agile and responsive to 
the ever evolving situation on the ground.

As we started 2023, we once again faced 
significant uncertainties surrounding the 
energy supply in the winter months, given 
previous attacks on the electricity grid 
and other infrastructure. This compelled 
us to manage our working capital and 
stocks effectively to mitigate the potential 
risk of blackouts while ensuring we could 
fulfil our obligations to customers. 

Pleasingly, the team’s cohesiveness, 
coupled with our proactive planning ahead 
of time meant we were able to manage 
through this uncertain start to the year. 
As we headed for the second quarter, and 
bolstered by a strong liquidity position, we 
seized market opportunities and restarted 
an additional pelletiser, thereby increasing 
our production capability and flexibility. 

With stable production from the first pellet line, 
and an initial contribution from the second 
pellet line, total iron ore pellet production for 
the first half was almost 2 million tonnes, a 57% 
increase compared to the second half of 2022.

Unfortunately, any expectations for further 
growth in production and sales in the 
second half of the year were thwarted 
by the continued inability to use the 
Black Sea for exports, which would have 
justified us further expanding capacity for 
exports to the Middle East and Asia. 

Despite these setbacks, we adjusted our 
operational plans swiftly, leveraging alternative 
routes into Europe and other Black Sea 
ports, to maintain sales levels while reducing 
production to align with market conditions. 
As a result, we ended the year producing at the 
logistics capacity available to us at 4.2 million 
tonnes of pellet and concentrate production.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

05

WE ARE DETERMINED

Look out for our Q&As with colleagues

Throughout this year’s report, colleagues from different functions across the  
business share their insights to explain what it is like working during a time of war.

See the pages below for their stories:

Culture 
page 15

Facilities 
page 17

Procurement 
page 21

Sales 
page 25

Internal reporting 
page 29

Translation 
page 31

CSR 
page 35

Processing 
page 37

HR 
page 41

Administration 
page 61

Logistics 
page 67

Transport 
page 68

Communications 
page 71

In terms of budgeting, we encountered some 
surprises, notably in logistics challenges 
and costs, however iron ore prices were 
strong in the final quarter helping to offset 
these costs. Indeed, for the year as a whole 
our unit costs reduced. All in all, thanks to 
years of investment prior to the war, our 
quality assets and premium product range 
continues to ensure our net cash position.

It was important that throughout 2023, we 
maintained a prudent approach to cash 
allocation, focusing on key operational and 
capital projects essential for sustaining our 
business amid volatile wartime conditions. 

The Group operates in an evolving political, 
fiscal and legal environment in Ukraine and 
the risks associated with this heightened 
further in 2023 and early 2024. As result, the 
Group has recognised provisions totalling 
US$128 million, including US$124 million 
for one specific ongoing legal dispute. See 
details in Note 2 Basis of preparation and 
Note 30 Commitments, contingencies and 
legal disputes to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements in respect of the possible 
impact on the Group’s business activities.

Looking ahead to the start of the new 
year, we remain cautiously optimistic. 
In particular, logistics costs have improved, 
providing us with a favourable environment 
to capitalise on market opportunities.

As we navigate the complexities of operating 
in a dynamic geopolitical landscape, our focus 
remains on building resilience, optimising 
our assets, and enhancing operational 
flexibility. Our high quality assets have been 
instrumental in providing stability amidst 
uncertainty, underscoring the importance 
of prudent investments made in the past.

In conclusion, while the road ahead will 
no doubt continue to present its share of 
challenges, we are confident in our ability to 
navigate through uncertainty and are prepared 
to continue delivering the embedded value 
in our quality assets to our shareholders. 
We appreciate your continued support and 
trust as we navigate these uncertain times.

Nikolay Kladiev
Chief Financial Officer, Ferrexpo plc

1.  Source: Independent research provided by CRU.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS06

Operating during a time of war

The full-scale invasion of Ukraine commenced 
on 24 February 2022. With all our production 
based in Ukraine, our workforce and operations 
are affected by the ongoing war. In this section we 
explain how the war is affecting our people and 
how we are managing the business at this time.

People 
The safety and wellbeing of our people 
is paramount, especially during a time 
of war. At the end of 2023 our Ukrainian 
workforce comprised 6,432 employees 
and 933 contractors. In addition, 641 
colleagues are currently serving in the Armed 
Forces of Ukraine, whom we support on 
an ongoing basis with safety equipment, 
clothing and other essentials throughout 
the time that they are in the military. 

As the war progresses, the availability of 
people and skills is becoming more complex. 
More members of our workforce are being 
conscripted to join the armed forces. Ferrexpo 
employees are attractive candidates because 
they possess the technical and mechanical 
skills that the army needs, the very skills that 
are critical to our production processes.

During 2023, more than 700 employees 
resigned or left our business. Although 
our operations are over 250 kilometres 
from the front lines, many have chosen to 
leave the region and move to the far west 
of Ukraine or abroad. This is in addition 
to the 900 or so that left in 2022. 

The business continues to carry a large 
workforce while operating at a reduced 
capacity. This means that to date there 
has been the sufficient amount of people 
to continue operations. As the business 
continues to restore idled capacity, many 
employees are back to a full working week, 
with some already working overtime. We 
are also recruiting more people, including 
younger and older people, and more women. 
At our Ferrexpo Technical Expertise Centre, 
multiple initiatives have been established 
to upskill, cross-skill and reskill employees, 
including fast tracking vocational training 
and qualifications programmes.

In 2023, 67 colleagues were demobilised from 
the armed forces, 46 of whom have returned 
to work. During the year, we expanded our 
support for veterans to include physical 
rehabilitation and psychological support. 
Veterans unable to return to their previous 
functions due to factors such as noise and 
vibration, are offered the opportunity to train 
and qualify for other more suitable roles.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Remembering  
those we have lost
Tragically, 19 colleagues were 
killed serving in the armed forces 
during 2023, bringing the total 
to 35 since February 2022. 

2023

Yuriy Bilenko, age 38

Serhii Buhuev, age 42

Oleksiy Bulba, age 45

Serhiy Chemkayev, age 44

Maksym Chystyakov, age 24

Volodymyr Holub, age 54

Oleksiy Khanilevych, age 24

Rostyslav Ledovskyy, age 25

Dmytro Lysachenko, age 28

Roman Lytvynenko, age 31

Vitaliy Med, age 40

Ihor Novohatniy, age 39

Volodymyr Pavlenko, age 43

Petro Perovskiy, age 25

Andrii Petrenko, age 49

Serhii Pizniy, age 34

Oleksandr Smyrnov, age 32

Vladyslav Solomko, age 33

Oleksandr Terlenko, age 48

2022

Dmytro Belikov, age 32

Oleksiy Bridnya, age 33

Andriy Chernya, age 37

Oleksandr Chugainov, age 54

Guy Dudka, age 52

Andriy Dukanych, age 33

Serhiy Kharlamov, age 57

Serhii Kondyk, age 31

Denys Koshovyy, age 31

Oleksiy Nazimov, age 25

Kostyantyn Orchikov, age 30

Oleksandr Scherbakov, age 28

Denys Svyrydov, age 50

Yaroslav Taran, age 50

Oleksiy Yatskov, age 36

Anatoliy Zakupets, age 37

Slava Ukraini.

07

In response, the Group sales strategy focused 
on premium European customers that could 
be reached by rail or a combination of rail and 
river barge using the Company’s owned barge 
fleet company First-DDSG Logistics. Another 
export route was later developed by rail to the 
Ukrainian border, and onward transportation 
by barge through inland waterways to 
a Black Sea port in another country.

The business learnt to be nimble and adapt 
to the many challenges it faced in 2023. 
Altering mining and processing to produce 
different products to meet customer needs, 
sourcing supplies of critical inputs, managing 
inventories to reduced logistics capacity, and 
finding alternative routes to supply customers.

The determination of the workforce, the 
flexibility of our operations, and our premium 
products sold to premium customers are 
our strengths, and explain how we are 
continuing to operate during a time of war.

Humanitarian support

US$25M

Local communities
During the early stages of the war, it was clear 
that the local communities where we operate 
needed humanitarian support. Although many 
people left, displaced people fleeing the war 
in the eastern regions passed through, and in 
some instances, settled in the Poltava region. 
In early 2022 the Ferrexpo Humanitarian 
Fund was established, which combined with 
associated CSR funding at the date of this 
report has donated US$25 million to foster 
over 100 individual programmes and initiatives.

As the war protracts, the needs of society 
are changing. In the early stages of the 
war, the immediate focus was to help 
house and feed people. This situation 
has settled now. Indeed, of the many 
new people that settled in the region, 
102 have taken employment at Ferrexpo. 

The focus of humanitarian support has 
evolved. Presently, we are committed to 
supporting our colleagues actively serving 
in the armed forces, as well as aiding in 
the rehabilitation of veterans. Additionally, 
contributions are directed towards addressing 
critical national emergencies, such as 
providing assistance to the residents of 
the Kherson region in the aftermath of 
the Nova Kakhovka Dam explosion.

In Horishni Plavni, the town centred on our 
operations, we continue to offer community 
support through commitments to cultural and 
social programmes, education and medical 
facilities, and infrastructure. This support 
also includes programmes and initiatives 
that support sports, social clubs and arts, 
along with physical and mental health.

Operations and logistics
Our operations are large in scale. The process 
flow is relatively simple: mining, processing 
and beneficiation, with considerable built-
in production flexibility at each stage.

During 2023, reduced logistics availability 
forced us to reduce production to a 
roughly a third of our full capacity. 

In addition to people, our operations rely on 
many inputs, including, energy, chemicals 
and equipment. Since the start of the full-
scale invasion, we have learnt to adapt to 
ever-changing conditions. This can mean 
finding new suppliers as our traditional 
suppliers have suffered from the war, or 
where logistics routes are no longer available.

Before the full-scale invasion, Ferrexpo 
transported its products using its own fleet 
of rail wagons and barges to customers in 
Europe, or via rail to Ukrainian Black Sea ports 
for onward transportation by ship, primarily 
from the Group’s joint venture facilities at the 
Port of Pivdennyi. Access to Ukrainian Black 
Sea ports was severely restricted in 2023, with 
only a handful of vessels leaving with cargoes 
of iron ore towards the end of the year.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS08

Our Business Model

Ferrexpo is a vertically integrated, 
pure-play iron ore pellet producer 
and supplier 

What we do

MINING

PROCESSING

TRANSPORTATION  
AND LOGISTICS

The competitive advantages that help us to create value

QUALITY 
ASSETS

LOW-COST 
PRODUCTION

GLOBAL 
DISTRIBUTION

Our world-class, long-life 
deposits hold 5.7 billion tonnes of 
JORC-compliant mineral resources.

Contiguous open pit mines use 
modern equipment and have an 
industry-leading safety performance.

Our ore processing metallurgical 
beneficiation and pelletiser plants 
produce a variety of pellets at a 
competitive cost.

Established and efficient large-scale 
plants with built-in operational flexibility 
to supply evolving customer needs. 

Owned transport equipment and 
logistics infrastructure, including 
rail, ports, river and ocean vessels.

Flexible handling and shorter 
delivery times to Europe and 
MENA than global peers.

50years

Mineral Reserves

12MT

Annual capacity from 
four pelletising lines

3rd

Largest exporter of  
pellets globally (pre-war)

REINVESTMENT INTO PEOPLE, TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND R&D

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

What we do

The competitive advantages that help us to create value

09

Our high quality products are preferred by premium steel producers 
around the world and are enabling the transition to green steel, 
whilst at the same time supporting the Ukrainian economy.

MARKETING

The outcomes we deliver

ECONOMIC

ROBUST PRE-WAR EARNINGS TRACK RECORD

SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTIONS

FISCAL CONTRIBUTIONS

PREMIUM 
PRODUCTS

SOCIAL

We have relationships with premium 
steel mills around the world, serving 
customers in Europe, MENA, Asia 
and North America.

Our premium products enable us 
to add more value for customers, 
supporting higher margins. 

65-67%

Fe content in all our products

INVESTMENT IN UKRAINE

SUPPORT DURING TIME OF WAR

SUPPORTING OUR WORKFORCE AND COMMUNITIES

DEVELOPING OUR WORKFORCE

ENVIRONMENTAL

ENABLING GREEN STEEL

SUPPORTING THE DRIVE TO NET ZERO

See how our activities create value  
for all of our stakeholders on page 64

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS10

Value Proposition

Why  
invest in 
Ferrexpo?

What’s the industry challenge?

The essential  
nature of steel

Transition to  
green steel

>1.85BN

Total steel production  
in 2023 (tonnes)

7%

Global greenhouse  
gas emissions currently 
generated through steel 
production

Iron ore is the main ingredient to make 
steel, on which our everyday lives depend. 
If something is not made of steel, it is made 
using it. Steel is also integral to the energy 
transition, critical for energy generation 
technologies such as wind turbines, 
transmission infrastructure and usage, and 
end-user products such as electric vehicles.

However, traditional steel production 
is emissions-intensive. Legislation and 
environmentally conscious end-users 
are facing a shift to lower and zero carbon 
steel. Consequently, steel producers will 
be forced to transition to lower and zero 
carbon feedstocks and production methods.

US$1.7T

Value of iron ore-steel value chain 
in 2022

+200MT 
green steel

Forecast global lower and zero 
carbon steel demand growth 
by 2030

30%

Forecast growth in demand  
for steel by 2050

80MT DR pellets

Forecast global demand growth 
for DR pellets by 2030, over one 
third of which in Europe

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
11

Why are we well positioned for the future?

Our industry-
leading products

Our unique scale, 
structure and 
infrastructure

Our focus on 
responsible 
operations

-37%

Lower global warming 
potential of steel made 
with Ferrexpo DR pellets

+50years

Life-of-mine high grade  
magnetite deposits

0.32LTIFR

Improved safety performance. 
2023 below five-year historical 
average 0.69

Ferrexpo is already a leading supplier 
of premium iron ore pellets and Direct 
Reduction Iron (“DR”) pellets, the products 
needed to transition to lower carbon steel. 
When used in an electric arc furnace 
(“EAF”), our DR pellets are proven to 
improve productivity and lower-carbon 
emissions by over a third compared to 
the traditional sinter and coal process.

As the only publicly listed, vertically 
integrated iron ore pellet producer and 
supplier of its size in Europe, Ferrexpo is 
uniquely positioned. The established scale 
of our assets, and the infrastructure, 
technology and skills that we have invested 
in over decades are difficult to replicate.

Before the war, Ferrexpo was the world’s 
third-largest exporter of iron ore pellets. 
We have committed to decarbonisation and 
Net Zero by 2050. Our safety performance 
is industry leading. We are a significant 
contributor to the local communities where 
we operate, and the Ukrainian economy. 

100MTPA

Large scale 

50% reduction

Forecast DR grade pellet deficit by 
2031 as pellets outpace traditional 
concentrates

Mines and pellet lines ensure 
variable and flexible production

2050 net-zero pathway, targeting 
50% reduction in Scope 1 and 2  
by 2030 

Pellet 
efficiency

Owned logistics 
infrastructure 

US$25M

DR pellets command premium 
prices due to their efficiency in 
lower carbon steel making

Providing multiple export routes  
to a global customer base

Funding for more than 100 
humanitarian projects and initiatives

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
12

Strategic Framework

Strategic direction

Strategic goal

Goals

01

High quality 
production

02

Focus on 
sustainability

03

Low cost  
operations

04

World class 
customer network

Focus on higher 
grade premium iron 
ore products needed 
to enable the transition 
to lower-carbon steel.

Through sustainable, 
ethical partnerships, 
realise value for all 
stakeholders. Prioritising 
support for Ukraine 
during a time of war.

Conserve the integrity 
of our assets, and 
continue investing to 
maintain competitive 
cost of production.

Working in partnership 
with our customers to 
improve efficiencies 
and decarbonise 
steel production.

05

Disciplined capital 
allocation

Prudent capital framework 
that balances operational 
and societal demands 
during a time of war.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

13

Achievements in 2023

Focus for 2024

–  High grade focus with 100% of all pellet and 

concentrate production grading 65% Fe or higher.
–  Second pelletiser line restarted adding production 

capacity and flexibility.

–  Resilient performance in challenging conditions during 

a time of war.

–  Continue to develop product portfolio.
–  Continue to invest in high grade and lower carbon forms of iron ore.
–  Completion of press filtration technology to improve product quality 

and cost efficiencies.

– 

Improved safety performance with an LTIFR of 0.32 
below the five-year trailing average of 0.69.
–  Zero fatalities for the third consecutive year.
–  Completion of a double materiality exercise.
–  Completion of a life cycle assessment for DR pellets.
–  Ongoing activities funded by Ferrexpo Humanitarian 

Fund.

–  Continue strong safety performance.
–  Respond to the needs of our workforce and local communities 

during a time of war.

–  Undertake a further life cycle assessment for blast furnace 
pellets to better understand environmental impact of other 
portfolio products.

–  Use the findings in the double materiality work to enhance our 

–  Lowering of Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2% per unit 

annual Responsible Business Report.

of production basis.

–  Publish a Climate Report that complies with latest regulations. 

–  C1 costs fell by 8% to US$76.5 per tonne due to 

–  Ensure that operations can continue to be flexible and 

devaluation of Ukrainian hvyrnia, lower gas prices and 
cost saving initiatives.

adapt to customers’ needs.

–  Balance supply risks for key consumables with effective 

cost control.

–  Continue to implement cost-saving initiatives across the 

Group’s operations.

–  The Group maintained contact with its global customer 
base through its sales teams in Europe, the MENA 
region and Asia.

–  Focus on accessible logistics resulted in 81% of sales 
to European customers, with the balance of sales to 
MENA customers.

–  Agreements signed with European customers to 

explore longer-term cooperation to decarbonise the 
steel value chain.

–  Balance sheet strength with net cash position 

increasing marginally to US$108 million. 

–  Ongoing capital investment, totalling US$101 million 
for the year, including sustaining and modernisation 
capital expenditure.

–  Continue to analyse safe and cost effective solutions for seaborne 

markets, including Ukrainian Black Sea ports.

–  Continue to liaise with customers and suppliers on decarbonisation 
efforts, to develop future sales in DR pellets in electric arc furnaces.

–  Ensure that the needs of all stakeholders are met and balanced 

through a measured approach to capital investment and balance 
sheet maintenance.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS14

Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”)

Measuring our performance

Financial KPIs

Underlying EBITDA

(Loss)/Profit after tax

Net cash flow from operating activities

US$130M

-US$85M

US$101M

2023

US$130M

2023

-US$85M

2023

US$101M

2022

2021

2020

2019

US$765M

2022

US$220M

2022

US$301M

US$1,439M

2021

US$871M

2021

US$1,093M

US$859M

US$586M

2020

2019

US$635M

US$403M

2020

2019

US$687M

US$473M

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Underlying EBITDA is an Alternative 
Performance Measure – please see 
page 236 for more details. 

The Group calculates the underlying 
EBITDA as profit before tax and finance plus 
depreciation and amortisation, adjusted 
for net gains and losses from disposal of 
investments property, plant and equipment, 
effects from share-based payments, write-offs 
and impairment losses and exceptional items.

The remuneration packages of the 
Group’s executive management team 
include references to Underlying EBITDA. 
See page 143 for more details.

2023 performance
Underlying EBITDA in 2023 fell 83% to US$130 
million, mainly due to lower production, sales 
volumes, realised prices and pellet premiums, 
partially offset by an 8% decrease in C1 costs.

Underlying EBITDA also includes operating 
foreign exchange gains of US$31 million 
in 2023 compared to US$339 million in 
2022. These foreign exchange differences 
are predominantly dependent on the 
fluctuation of the exchange rate of the 
Ukrainian hryvnia against the US dollar.

2024 outlook
The future performance of the Group is largely 
dependent on the ongoing war situation in 
Ukraine and the levels of achievable sales due 
to logistics restrictions.

In addition to Alternative Performance 
Measures, Ferrexpo considers the IFRS 
results of the Group to be an important 
measurement of profitability. Loss after tax 
is reported in the Group’s Consolidated 
Income Statement on page 171. Loss after 
tax is the earnings of a business after all 
income taxes have been deducted.

2023 performance
For the financial year the Group reported a 
loss of US$85 million, due to provisions for 
ongoing legal proceedings and disputes 
in Ukraine totalling US$128 million as at 
31 December 2023. Without the effect from 
these provisions, the result for the financial 
year 2023 would have been a profit of US$46 
million, compared to US$220 million in 2022.

2024 outlook
Like other factors, the Group’s 
outlook for the year ahead is heavily 
dependent on the war situation.

In addition to the factors discussed in 
the Underlying EBITDA section, loss after 
tax also considers the tax impact on the 
Group and other factors such as interest 
and finance expenses. Given that Ferrexpo 
remains in a net cash position, with no 
debt, these are currently not material in the 
Group’s overall financial performance. 

In light of the Group’s net cash position and 
operations being based in Ukraine, the Group 
does not expect to take on any new material 
debt facilities in 2024, but remains in contact 
with a number of potential capital providers.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Net cash flow from operating activities 
represents the cash flow generating ability 
of the Group, and measures the funding a 
company generates from ongoing, regular 
business activities, such as production 
and sales. It is reported in the Group’s 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 
on page 174. It also indicates the level of 
cash flow available for investments, returns 
to shareholders and debt reduction.

2023 performance
The net cash flow from operating activities 
for the year was US$101 million, and was 
considered by the Group in its capital 
allocation framework, including capital 
expenditure, shareholder returns, and 
exceptional bail payments for managers 
of one of the Group’s subsidiaries. 

Despite the lower cash flow generation, the 
Group maintained a closing balance of cash 
and cash equivalents at US$115 million as 
of 31 December 2023 (2022: US$113).

2024 outlook
The Group’s financial performance, including 
net cash flow from operating activities, 
is dependent on the ongoing war, with 
a wide range of potential outcomes. 

The Group continues to focus on high grade, 
high quality forms of higher margin iron ore, 
which the Group expects will allow it to remain 
competitive throughout the commodities cycle.

15

WE ARE DETERMINED

Mykola Stakhiv,  
Head of the Corporate Museum, FPM

The Ferrexpo museum in Horishni 
Plavni is a place of cultural pride 
for the local community. Managed 
by Mykola, the museum collection 
covers the history of the local 
region and Ferrexpo. It is also an 
important learning institution 
through its affiliations with local 
schools.

 What is the biggest impact the 
war has had on your job?
With the beginning of a full-scale invasion, 
the opportunities to update exhibitions, 
accept excursions, and implement 
museum projects were significantly limited.

What has the war taught you 
about how you do your job?
Since the start of the war in 2014 and 
through the COVID pandemic, we have 
learned to work under restrictions and with 
extreme conditions. Although on a smaller 
scale, we continued to conduct excursions 
and exhibitions, working with more archival 
materials. We have also been cooperating 
with Ferrexpo employees serving in the 
armed forces to accession documents, 
photos, and items from the war as 
evidence of Russian aggression.

What do you look forward to most 
about your job when the war ends?
In the future we hope to create a museum 
website and digital archive so that we can 
widen our audiences. There are lots of 
opportunities for new exhibitions. I believe 
that preserving history is important. It is 
important for the development of Ferrexpo 
and the corporate spirit of its employees.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

C1 cash cost of production

US$76.5/T

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

US$76.5/T

US$83.3/T

US$55.8/T

US$41.5/T

US$47.8/T

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

C1 cash cost of productionA (“C1 costs”) 
is an Alternative Performance Measure – 
please see page 236 for more details.

The C1 cash cost of production is the cost 
of production processes to the factory 
gate, divided by production to derive a 
cost per tonne figure. This is an industry 
standard measurement and can be used 
to assess the relative competitiveness.

The remuneration packages of the Group’s 
executive management team include 
references to the Group’s C1 cash cost of 
production. Please see page 143 for more.

2023 performance
C1 costs per tonne depends on production 
volumes due to large fixed overheads. The 
average C1 costs for 2023 fell 8% to US$76.50 
per tonne, mainly due to devaluation of the 
local currency in the second half of 2022, the 
positive net effect of lower gas prices and 
higher electricity and cost saving initiatives, 
partially offset by the negative effects of fixed 
cost absorption from operating below capacity.

2024 outlook
The war in Ukraine affects a range of 
production outcomes. Should risks and 
restrictions ease in the coming year, 
the Group would expect its C1 cash 
costs to reduce, as the Group would 
benefit from economies of scale through 
operating at an increased capacity. 

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS16

Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”) continued

Non-financial KPIs

Lost-time injury frequency rate (“LTIFR”)

Diversity in management roles

Greenhouse gas emissions

0.32 LTIFR

22.3% female

89kg/t

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

0.32

0.51

0.41

0.79

0.58

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

22.3%

2023

20.9%

20.1%

18.2%

17.5%

2022

2021

2020

2019

89kg/t

91kg/t

92kg/t

110kg/t

132kg/t

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, and 5.

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Safety is the Group’s highest priority. 

An organisation’s LTIFR is a lagging indicator 
of safety. It is calculated as the number of 
lost-time injuries incurred by an organisation’s 
workforce (being employees and contractors)
per million hours worked. LTIFR is an industry 
standard measurement and an important 
indicator of how safe the work environment is.

The remuneration packages of the 
Group’s executive management team 
include references to the Group’s LTIFR. 
Please see page 143 for more details of 
the Group’s incentive programme.

2023 performance
The Group’s LTIFR has remained at a relatively 
low level for approximately five years, falling 
from an average of 1.18 (2016–2018) to an 
average of 0.32 for 2023, ahead of the Group’s 
historical five-year trailing average of 0.69. 

Safety performance is also measured via 
the number of fatalities at the Group’s 
operations, which have remained fatality 
free for more than three successive years.

2024 outlook
The Group has maintained a low level of 
injuries and injury incidents in recent years. 
The Group aims to continue this progress, 
through targeting zero lost-time injuries. 

In 2022, Ferrexpo introduced a ‘Zero 
Harm’ policy that aims to ensure all 
workers return home safely from every 
shift. Please see page 34 for more on 
our approach to health and safety.

Ferrexpo has initiatives to promote 
diversity in many forms – including 
based on gender, disability, sexual 
orientation and cultural diversity.

Gender diversity is measured in a number 
of ways, including total workforce and 
female representation in management 
positions. The Group prefers to focus on 
female representation in management 
roles as it is a reflection of women 
progressing their careers at Ferrexpo.

The remuneration packages of the Group’s 
executive management team, include 
references to the Group’s workforce diversity. 
Please see page 143 for more details.

2023 performance
Female representation in managerial 
positions increased to 22% in 2023 
following a multi-year trend from 18% in 
2019. The Group target is 25% by 2030.

2024 outlook
The Group’s diversity programme is 
targeting female representation in a number 
of departments, at a range of levels within 
our organisation. Our lead programme for 
promoting gender diversity in management 
roles is our Fe_munity Women in Leadership 
programme (“Fe_munity”), which is now 
in its fourth year of selecting and training 
high potential future female leaders of our 
business. This programme has trained over 
200 participants since this project’s inception.

Please see page 60 for more on our 
approach to diversity in our workforce.

The Group understands the importance 
of climate change and we report emissions 
of greenhouse gases (Scope 1, 2 and 3) to 
track decarbonisation efforts. Due to the 
war in Ukraine, we consider emissions per 
tonne, not absolute emissions, as the most 
representative performance measure.

The remuneration packages of the Group’s 
executive management team, include 
references to the Group’s greenhouse gas 
emissions. Please see page 143 for more.

2023 performance
Scope 1 and 2 emissions per tonne fell 2% 
in 2023, reflecting a reduction in the ancillary 
activities due to lower production and more 
electricity being sourced from cleaner 
sources including hydro and nuclear power. 

However, no DR pellets were produced in 
2023, consequently, Scope 3 emissions 
on a unit basis increased to 1.33 tCO2/t 
of pellet production from 1.24 tCO2/t 
in 2022. Absolute Scope 3 emissions 
nevertheless decreased 25% year-on-year 
due to the overall lower production. 

2024 outlook
The Group aims to continue its 
decarbonisation pathway, although 
a protracted war may require some 
revisions to its targets in future. The 
current targets are a 50% reduction in 
Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030.

Due to the war in Ukraine, it is difficult 
to estimate short-term outcomes in 
emissions reduction, but we remain 
focused on our goal to decarbonise.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

17

Sales volume by region

81% to Europe

2023

2022

2021

Region

  Europe

 MENA

 Asia

    Other

2023

2022

2021

3,397

4,655

5,268

777

611

1,402

0

0

917

4,290

0

389

Link to strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Sales during 2023 have been restricted due 
to limited access to Ukrainian Black Sea 
ports, and therefore focused on premium 
European customers accessible by rail. 

Located in Europe, Ferrexpo is closer to 
European and MENA customers, whilst 
still competitive with global peers to Asian 
markets. This was demonstrated during the 
Covid-19 pandemic when we successfully 
pivoted sales towards China, increasing our 
total sales to this market to over 50%.

2023 performance
In 2023, over three quarters of all sales were 
to European customers. During this period, 
we were able to strengthen our relationships 
with these customers and commitments to 
jointly improve efficiencies and decarbonise 
together. Transporting by rail, inland waterways 
and sea, provided multiple logistics channels 
to reach European customers. The remaining 
19% of sales were in the MENA region. 

A total of over 100,000 tonnes of DR pellets 
were sold from stocks during the year. 

2024 outlook
Towards the end of 2023, there were examples 
of others exporting via Ukrainian Black Sea 
ports. Ferrexpo plans to resume exporting 
via this route and start up an additional 
pellet line depending on the ability to export 
consistent and sufficient volumes in a safe and 
cost effective manner whenever possible.

WE ARE DETERMINED

Nataliya Orekhova,  
Canteen Manager, FYM

What is the biggest impact the 
war has had on your job?
The war taught me to work even when it is 
difficult emotionally and physically. I go to 
work because people need me, because 
they need a hot meal and a friendly face 
to ask them: “How are you doing?”

When the war finishes, what will 
be different for your work? 
The war has already changed my 
job, I now realise more than ever how 
important it is. When the war ends there 
will be more pleasant reasons to get 
together, without the joyful moments 
being interrupted by air raids.

Across our operations there are 
various kitchens and canteens 
that serve food for our workforce 
and visitors. Nataliya joined 
Ferrexpo in July 2012 as a chef, 
and since 2016 has been valued 
as the Canteen Manager at the 
Yeristova operation.

 As the war progresses, what 
has changed in how you undertake 
your work?
I’ve always associated my work with 
pleasure, from the positive emotions of 
delicious food. After February 24, 2022, 
everything changed, and at work too. 
The preparation of food for banquets 
turned into cooking for internally 
displaced people. And the leisure time I 
used to enjoy during peace time turned 
to support for children and adults who 
lived in temporary accommodation.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
18

Operational Review

During 2023, the Group maintained 
production, operating two mines 
and up to two of four pelletiser 
lines, achieving production of 
4.2 million tonnes.

Viktor Lotous,
Head of Ferrexpo’s 
Operations in Ukraine 
(FPM General Director)

As a large scale premium iron ore pellet 
and concentrate exporter, access to 
logistics is critical. Due to the ongoing war 
in Ukraine, our activities in 2023 reduced 
according to available export logistics. 
Attacks on Ukraine’s electricity energy and 
transport infrastructure also continued, at 
times limiting our ability to import supplies, 
and produce and export our products.

Health and safety
2023 was the third consecutive year that 
we have reported zero fatalities at our 
operations. For the year, the Group reported 
a rolling 12-month LTIFR of 0.32, below the 
historic five-year trailing average of 0.69.

Reserves and resources
Ferrexpo controls licences covering a 
series of contiguous deposits located 
along the Kremenchuk Magnetic Anomaly, 
a magnetite deposit that extends for 
more than 50 kilometres. The Group has 
mines on three deposits and additional 
licences for deposits immediately to 
the north of our current operations.

Across the Group’s three active mines, 
JORC-compliant Ore Reserves are estimated 
to be 1,615 million tonnes of iron ore, with 
an iron (“Fe”) content of 32% Fe (2022: 
1,627 million tonnes grading 32% Fe). 

The JORC-compliant Mineral Resource 
estimate across our three mines is 5,737 million 
tonnes of iron ore, with an iron (“Fe”) content 
of 32% Fe (2022: 5,749 million tonnes grading 
32% Fe), which is inclusive of Ore Reserves. 

Processing activities
Reflecting reduced logistics availability, 
processing volumes decreased 
by 33% during 2023 to 12 million 
tonnes (2022: 17 million tonnes).

In addition, at a number of exploration 
properties immediately north of our active 
mines, we have exploration stage properties 
with a combined non-JORC compliant 
Mineral Resource estimate of 14 billion tonnes 
of iron ore, grading 34% Fe (collectively 
referred to as the “Northern Deposits”).

A table detailing the Group’s JORC-compliant 
Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources as at 
1 January 2024 is detailed on page 21.

Mining activities
Throughout the year, we continued to scale our 
mining operations according to the processing 
plant ore requirements, determined by logistics 
availability. Mining activities focused on the 
Poltava and Yeristovo Mines, with volumes 
totalling 36 million tonnes (2022: 55 million 
tonnes). Different sections of the pits were 
mined depending on the concentrate and 
pellet quality required by individual customers. 

In 2022, the Group produced 353,000 
tonnes of DR pellets, equivalent to 6% of 
total output. No DR pellets were produced 
in 2023, however, sales of 100,000 tonnes 
from stocks were achieved. Nevertheless, 
during this challenging time for the country, 
the work on DR pellets continues, in particular, 
we are improving our pellet production 
technology by finding a technical solution 
for the coating of our pellets. This was made 
possible through the initiative of internal 
experts united by a common goal to enhance 
the quality of final products. A temporary 
solution for coating of FDP pellets has 
already been implemented at Pellet Lines 
1 & 2. Now we are elaborating a permanent 
solution for all four pelletising lines to install 
the system that will coat FDP pellets with a 
mixture tailored to customer requirements. 
The development of design documentation 
is underway. Due to these projects, steel 
customers are expected to improve their 
technological manufacturing processes.

See our KPIs on pages 14

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

19

Following Russian attacks on Ukraine’s energy 
infrastructure during 4Q 2022, the Group 
was forced to temporarily cease production 
for several weeks. In preparation for similar 
attacks in 4Q 2023, throughout 2Q and 3Q 
2023, the Group built stocks of finished pellets 
at its operations and at various staging points 
across its logistics network in Ukraine and 
overseas so that it would be able to continue 
supplying its customers. Fortunately, there 
were far fewer attacks in 4Q 2023, so the 
Group was able to reduce production and 
drawdown from it stocks to supply customers.

Growth programme
The Group’s expansion and decarbonisation 
programmes remain longer-term objectives. 
The initial Wave 1 programme to add 3 million 
tonnes production capacity a year continues to 
be analysed for implementation after the war 
ends. Desktop work, including optimisation 
studies, is ongoing, however wherever possible 
investment has been deferred. Nevertheless, 
despite the ongoing war, various capital 
expenditure projects aimed at improving 
product quality and efficiencies advanced. For 
example, in July 2023 the Company installed 
and implemented the first stage of modern 
press filtration technology at the pellets 
workshop. This technology helps to strengthen 
finished pellets, whilst increasing productivity 
and reducing iron losses, which results in costs 
savings and a reduction in Scope 1 emissions.

Operational performance

(000’t unless otherwise stated)

2023

2022

YoY change

Production

Iron ore mined

Strip ratio

Iron ore processed

Concentrate production

Pellet production

– Direct reduction pellets (67% Fe)

– Premium blast furnace pellets (65% Fe)

Commercial concentrate production

Iron ore sales

– Pellets

– Concentrate

– Total products sold

12,112

18,837

2.0

1.9

11,576

17,375

5,314

3,845

0

3,845

307

3,868

306

4,174

8,025

6,053

353

5,700

124

6,055

128

6,183

(36%)

3%

(33%)

(34%)

(36%)

(100%)

(33%)

148%

(36%)

140%

(32%)

Outlook
Logistics availability will continue to determine 
sales and production during 2024. The Group 
intends to continue the operation of two 
pelletiser lines. Depending on the availability 
to export through different Black Sea ports, 
the opportunity to expand production further 
with the restart of the third pelletiser line 
remains. This will be contingent on sufficient 
supply of consumables, a balanced and 
skilled workforce, and logistics capacity.

During the first phase of the war in 2022, 
the Group responded quickly to protect 
its employees and protect the integrity of 
its assets. During 2023, the Group has 
become more agile and flexible, and was 
able to deliver to its closest customers.

Whilst the Group cannot with any certainty 
offer production and cost guidance for 2024, 
there are some opportunities to enhance 
efficiencies, production and sales.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS20

Operational Review continued

JORC-Compliant Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources1

JORC-compliant Ore Reserves

Gorishne-Plavninske-Lavrykivske (“GPL”)

Yerystivske

Total

Proven

Probable

Total

Fe  
total 
%

Fe  
magnetic 
%

33

30

32

26

25

26

Mt

818

288

1,106

Fe  
total 
%

Fe  
magnetic 
%

31

33

32

23

26

24

Mt

1,119

496

1,615

Fe  
total 
%

Fe  
magnetic 
%

32

32

32

24

26

25

Mt

301

208

509

Measured

Indicated

Inferred

Total

JORC-compliant Mineral Resources

Mt

Fe  
total 
%

Fe  
magnetic 
%

Gorishne-Plavninske-
Lavrykivske (“GPL”)

Yerystivske

Bilanivske

Total

467

257

336

1,060

35

35

31

34

29

29

24

27

Fe  
total 
%

Fe  
magnetic 
%

30

34

31

31

22

27

23

23

Mt

744

382

217

1,343

Fe  
total 
%

Fe  
magnetic 
%

32

33

30

32

24

27

21

24

Mt

2,827

1,208

1,702

5,737

Fe  
total 
%

Fe  
magnetic 
%

31

34

31

32

24

27

23

24

Mt

1,616

569

1,149

3,334

1.  The Group’s JORC-compliant Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources shown above are based on an independent review completed by Bara Consulting, and are shown on a depleted basis 

as of 1 January 2024. The Group previously reported a resource estimate of 326Mt for the Galeschynske deposit.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

21

WE ARE DETERMINED

Nataliia Mozghova,
Head of the Department of Equipment, Raw Materials 
and Materials Procurement Strategy, FPM

Nataliia has worked at Ferrexpo 
for 24 years. She joined as an 
economist and ten years later 
established the procurement 
service where she is now the 
department head.

How has the war most affected 
your work?
We have always taken our responsibilities 
seriously and worked hard to ensure the 
best prices and quality of goods and 
services for our enterprises in Ukraine. 
Before the full-scale invasion, we had 
developed procurement strategies for most 
of the goods and services, which allowed us 
to sign long-term contracts with suppliers 
based on formula pricing. We had a 
predictable, stable, and wide base of reliable 
suppliers. Logistics was not a problem – we 
could purchase for deliveries through ports, 
railways, and any other means beneficial 
for the company. With the onset of the war, 
many suppliers lost their businesses due 
to occupation and the destruction of their 
operations. Logistics paths were interrupted, 
and ports closed. Some of the foreign 
and Ukrainian enterprises we worked with 
fell under sanctions, and many suppliers 
initially refused to deliver products due to 
the dangers and a refusal to cooperate 
on formula pricing. This forced us to work 

on monthly contracts which significantly 
increasing our administrative burden. 
However, despite all the challenges, we 
made every effort to continue supplying 
our enterprise with everything needed 
in a timely manner. I am proud that we 
have been able to successfully maintain 
a stable procurement process.

What has the war taught you 
in procurement work?
The war taught us flexibility. We became 
more responsive to change, developed an 
understanding, and significantly improved 
our patience skills when urgent purchases 
were needed for different divisions of 
Ferrexpo. During the war, the procurement 
teams at Ferrexpo reorganized into a single 
and united team. Despite the somewhat 
different approaches in procurement 
policies we had before the war, we are glad 
that we now work as a unified team with 
well-coordinated systems.

How will the end of the war 
affect your work?
Our great hope is that we can work with more 
stability after the war – these are the main 
changes we look forward to. We have come 
to understand that we are capable of a lot if 
we work as a united team. We will continue 
to look for the best suppliers, continue 
negotiations, and continue to provide the 
best service we can for our colleagues.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS22

Market Review

Stronger than  
forecast iron ore prices 
supported reduced 
sales volumes.

Yaroslavna Blonska,
Acting Chief Marketing Officer

Benchmark iron ore prices gained 15%  
over the year and ended 2023 at an 
18-month high. Pellet premiums, however, 
remained weak throughout much of the 
year, improving only in the last few months, 
which bodes well for the year ahead. 

Ferrexpo produces premium iron ore pellets 
with a minimum 65% Fe content, which 
are priced off quoted market benchmarks, 
and include a pellet premium that takes 
into account quality specifications.

The 65% Fe iron ore fines price opened the 
year at US$131 per tonne. As China emerged 
from strict pandemic related restrictions and 
in anticipation of stocking ahead of the peak 
Chinese construction season, prices rose 
to a peak US$149 per tonne in 1Q 2023. 

Actual demand, however, did not meet 
expectations, and consequently prices fell 
in 2Q 2023 to a low of US$110 per tonne.

Uncertainty prevailed through the remainder 
of 2Q and into 3Q 2023 as the market 
responded to short-term macro-economic 
and construction industry signals. 
This resulted in volatile prices, oscillating 
between US$110 and US$135 per tonne.

A clearer and more positive picture emerged 
in 4Q 2023 as China asserted its pursuit of 
accelerated economic growth dependent 
on steel-intensive sectors. At this time, 
market supply was tight with inventories at 
historically low levels. Therefore, a strong 
rally in prices ensued in 4Q 2023, increasing 
over 20% from October 2023 to end the 
year just shy of US$150 per tonne.

The price of iron ore is very dependent 
on China. In 2024, government policy 
supporting industrial sectors has stimulated 
demand for steel. However, certain risks 
remain. The margins for manufacturing 
steel are still low, due to weak demand 
for rebar, used in construction.

However, market commentators 
are forecasting flat supply for 2024, 
with limited growth from the largest 
producers, Australia and Brazil. 

Customer sales in 2023

4.2MT

During the first full year of war, the 
Group achieved sales of 4.2 million 
tonnes. With no access to the 
Ukrainian Black Sea ports, exports 
were constrained to the availability 
of rail capacity for exports direct 
to Europe and alternative Black 
Sea ports. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

23

Chart: CISA daily crude steel production (Mt)

2.50

2.25

2.00

1.75

1.50

First Mid Last
Jan
2023

First Mid Last
Feb

First Mid Last
Mar

First Mid Last
Apr

First Mid Last
May

First Mid Last
Jun

First Mid Last
Jul

First Mid Last
Aug

First Mid Last
Sept

First Mid Last
Oct

First Mid Last
Nov

First Mid Last
Dec

2022

2021

High grade premiums
The premium for higher grade 65% Fe 
iron ore fines contracted by a third in 2023 
to US$12 per tonne. This is typical when 
there is weakness in the steel market as 
producers prefer lower cost iron ore grades to 
preserve their margins. However, premiums 
improved marginally during December 
2023 due to disruptions to global supply. 
Longer term, as steel production is forced 
to decarbonise, it is expected that margins 
should widen further because higher grade 
ores generate less emissions in steel making. 

Iron ore pellet market 
review & outlook
Iron ore pellets are preferred by steelmakers 
because they can increase productivity and 
lower emissions. This is mainly because with 
pellets, there is no need for a coal intensive 
process in steel making called sintering.

In 2023, the iron ore pellet market experienced 
some volatility, though remained robust. 
Overall pellet supply globally grew by 
1%1. Brazilian producers recommissioned 
capacity that was idled following tailings 
disasters. The increase in exports from 
Brazil offset supply disruptions from Ukraine 
and Russia. Because of Chinese steel 
production margins, there was less incentive 
to consume pellets and, consequently, pellet 
premiums deteriorated throughout the year.

Chart: Iron ore prices (2023)

200

150

100

50

Jan 23

Feb 23

Mar 23

Apr 23 May 23

Jun 23

Jul 23

Aug 23

Sep 23

Oct 23

Nov 23

Dec 23

Platts 65%

Platts 62%

Chart: Chinese domestic steel margins (2023)

260

240

200

160

120

80

40

0

-40

-80

1.  Source: CRU

-120

2023

Apr

Jul

Oct

AMVSA00 - MVS HRC China Domestic Steel Mill Margin

AMVSB00 - MVS RebarChina Domestic Steel Mill Margin

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS24

Market Review continued

Chart: Monthly Brazilian pellet exports (Mt)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

CISA daily crude steel production (Mt/d)

Brazilian pellet exports

Looking ahead to 2024, the recovery of iron 
ore prices due to the Chinese government 
supporting economic growth, a recovery 
in European demand, and ongoing supply 
constraints, market commentators are 
forecasting an improvement in steel 
margins and, therefore, pellet demand.

By the end of 2023, several blast furnaces 
in the region had restarted, whilst a large 
European producer was forced to suspend 
exports due to infrastructure constraints. 

Therefore, in an improving pricing 
environment, an increase in demand for 
Ferrexpo’s pellets is being observed.

Market development efforts
Ferrexpo has continued its market 
development efforts despite the ongoing war. 
In 2023, Memorandums of Understanding 
were signed with several premium steel makers 
in Europe and Asia for the supply of high 
grade direct reduction (“DR”) pellets to help 
them transition to lower carbon steel making.

DR pellet demand growth is forecast to 
significantly outpace traditional pellets and 
therefore one of our strategies is to focus on 
this premium product. We are collaborating 
with a variety of potential customers around 
the world to test our product suitability 
and tailor DR pellet specifications to suit 
each customer’s technical requirements. 
These include reducing silica content 
(gangue elements), coating (to improve 
physical interaction in the DR module), and 
improving on pellet compression strength.

2022

YoY change

120

139

19

72

87

24

13

–

(5%)

(34%)

(38%)

(34%)

(14%)

(20%)

1%

Summary of industry key statistics

(All figures US$/tonne, unless stated otherwise)

Iron ore fines price (62% Fe, CFR China)1

Iron ore fines price (65% Fe, CFR China)1

Average 65% Fe spread over 62% Fe1

Atlantic (blast furnace) pellet premium1

Direct reduction pellet premium1

C3 freight (Brazil – China)2

C2 freight (Brazil – Netherlands)2

2023

120

132

12

45

57

21

10

Global steel production (million tonnes)3

1,850

1,832

1.  Source: S&P Global Commodity Insights. 
2.  Source: Baltic Exchange.
3.  Source: World Steel Association. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

25

FE content %

WE ARE DETERMINED

Wallace Woo and Aly Mansour

Based in Ferrexpo’s Dubai office, 
Wallace Woo is the Marketing 
Portfolio Optimisation Manager, 
specialising in commodity and 
freight markets and Aly Mansour is 
the Regional Marketing Manager for 
the Middle East.

What is the biggest impact the war 
has had on your job?
The war severely disrupted supply chains 
so we had to move fast and establish 
alternative export channels by sea, road 
and rail to minimise any impact on our 
customers. This meant a lot of travel to 
ensure close cooperation with existing and 
new logistics partners. This collaboration 
remains vital because we want to maintain 
high standards of quality control.

What has the war taught you?
Frequent communication with our 
stakeholders, especially customers and 
shipping partners, was key. Even in an 
uncertain environment we want them 
to remain confident in Ferrexpo’s ability 
to deliver in a stable manner. We learnt 
that through frequent and transparent 
dialogue, together we were able to generate 
creative solutions to overcome complex 
logistics problems due to the war.

When the war finishes, what will 
be different for you?
We look forward to helping Ferrexpo 
return to full capacity and, in particular, 
growing the huge potential for our high 
grade direct reduction pellets. We have the 
opportunity to become a leading partner in 
the decarbonisation of the steel value chain. 
We are actually already working closely 
with certain customers on commercial and 
technical initiatives. It is exciting to think how 
Ferrexpo will play a big role in green steel.

68

67

66

65

64

63

62

61

60

59

Ferrexpo 
Premium 
Pellets

Ferrexpo 
Direct 
Reduction 
Pellets

62 Index 
(Medium 
Grade 
Benchmark)

65 Index 
(High 
Grade 
Benchmark)

Ferrexpo 2023 sales portfolio 

10%

90%

 Long term contracts

 Other

3.7mt

0.4mt

Ferrexpo continues to sell the 
majority of its products under 
long-term contracts, which secures 
stable offtake volume for the Group 
and commands greater certainty of 
supply for customers.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
26

Financial Review

Cash positive operations 
during a time of war have 
allowed for continued 
controlled investment whilst 
maintaining a stable net 
cash position.

Nikolay Kladiev,
Chief Financial Officer

Net cash position

US$108M 

Stable net cash position in difficult 
and challenging environment (2022: 
US$106 million).

Net cash flows from  
operating activities

US$101M

Positive operating cash flow 
generation, although lower than 
previous year (2022: US$301 million), 
affected by the war. 

Summary
The ongoing war in Ukraine continued to 
affect the Group’s operational and financial 
performance in 2023. Taking into account 
logistics and energy limitations throughout 
2023, production volumes were aligned 
with sales potential to manage the working 
capital and maintain a strong net cash 
position. The general market and price 
environment was favourable for iron ore 
products, whilst energy prices developed 
differently to 2022 (higher electricity price, 
and lower gas price), the Group’s operating 
cash flow generation declined compared to 
the previous year, which included two months 
of sales prior to Russia’s full-scale invasion. 

Despite the ongoing war, we invested 
US$101 million into our assets in Ukraine 
in 2023 and were able to finish the year 
with a net cash position of US$108 
million as at 31 December 2023.

Revenue
Group revenues declined by 48% to 
US$652 million in 2023 (2022: US$1,248 
million), mainly due to restricted access 
to export routes. Consequently, sales 
volumes were 32% lower at 4.2 million 
tonnes in 2023 (2022: 6.2 million tonnes).

In addition to lower sales volumes, Group 
revenue in 2023 was affected by a 5% decline 
in the annual average benchmark iron ore 
price (65% Fe) and a 28% decline in the annual 
average pellet premium. On the positive side, 

lower rates for international freight improved 
the Group’s net back realised prices for sales 
under the International Commercial Terms 
(“Incoterms”) of FOB (“Free on Board”). 
However, due to lack of access to Ukrainian 
Black Sea ports, the Group’s FOB sales were 
lower than in 2022, which included almost 
two months of access to the port of Pivdennyi 
before the war began. For more information 
on the market factors governing pricing of the 
Group’s products, please see pages 80 to 85.

Since the beginning of the war, the Group’s 
export routes have predominantly involved 
either the railing of products direct to European 
customers, or the railing of iron ore pellets to 
the Group’s barging subsidiary on the River 
Danube for delivery to specific customers in 
Europe, or by barge to other non-Ukrainian 
Black Sea ports, for onward sale by ship. This 
incurs higher logistics costs and a longer cash 
conversion cycle. More detail is provided in 
the ‘Market Review’ section of this report.

C1 cash cost of production
Cost of sales in 2023 totalled US$362 million, 
compared to US$582 million in 2022. The 
decrease predominantly results from the lower 
pellet production volume, which decreased 
from 6.1 million tonnes in 2022 to 3.8 million 
tonnes (-38%). The Group’s production volume 
is currently aligned to accessible logistics 
capacity to minimise the working capital 
outflow. The C1 cash cost of production 
(“C1 costs”) reflects the Group’s operating 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

27

Underlying EBITDA margin

20%

Underlying EBITDA margin remains 
positive (2022: 61% boosted also by 
significant foreign exchange gains 
in 2023).

Capital investment

US$101M

Continued unavoidable investments 
in 2023, aligned to lower cash flow 
generation (2022: US$161 million).

Breakdown of C1 costs in 2023

US$76.5/t

(2022: US$83.3/t)

 Electricity

 Natural gas and sunflower husks

 Fuel (including diesel)

 Materials

 Personnel

 Maintenance and repairs

 Grinding media

 Royalties

 Explosives

32%

9%

7%

8%

11%

16%

6%

9%

2%

The numbers above are rounded to full decimals.

costs for the production of iron ore pellets from 
its own ore, with a breakdown of the different 
cost components shown in the table below.

Additionally, there was a positive effect from 
the decrease of the Group’s average C1 costs, 
decreasing to US$76.5 per tonne, compared 
to US$83.3 per tonne in 2022 (-8%). The C1 
costs per tonne also depends on the Group’s 
production volumes. The change in 2023 is 
predominantly driven by the effects of the 
significant devaluation of the local currency 
in the second half of 2022, the positive net 
effect of lower gas prices and higher electricity 
and additional cost saving initiatives, which 
were partially offset by the negative effects 
from the fixed cost absorption as the Group 
operated its assets below nameplate capacity.

The main C1 costs drivers are the price of 
electricity, natural gas and diesel in Ukraine 
being outside of the Group’s control, which 
collectively represent 48% (2022: 49%) of the 
total cost base as presented in the table below.

Following a sharp increase in global energy 
prices during 2022, the average Brent price 
for oil in 2023 and the average price for 
natural gas decreased by 17% and 68% 
respectively in US dollar terms, compared 
to the 18% and 67% increases recorded in 
2022. The average electricity price in Ukraine 
increased in 2023 by 12% in US dollar terms, 
peaking at US$112 per megawatt-hour 
(“MWh”) in November 2023, compared to 
an average of US$83 per MWh in 2022. 

Another important component of the Group’s 
C1 costs that is outside of the Group’s control 
are the royalties in Ukraine, which accrue and 
are paid based on a tiered system, which came 
into effect in January 2022. Based on this 
regime, royalties are calculated based on the 
benchmark index price for a medium-grade 
(62% Fe) iron ore fines price and computed 
based on the cost of different iron ore products. 
The rate varies between 3.5%, 5.0% and 10% 
depending on benchmark index price for 62% 
Fe. The total royalty expense totalled US$25 
million in 2023, compared to US$41 million in 
2022, mainly driven by the lower production 
volume, but also by the effect of lower index 
prices during some periods in 2023.

Group operating costs, denominated in 
Ukrainian hryvnia (“UAH”), account for 
approximately two thirds of the Group’s C1 
costs. Consequently, changes in hryvnia to 
dollar rates can have a significant impact 
on the Group’s operating costs, including 
the C1 costs. The UAH depreciated in the 
last quarter of 2023 from 36.569 to 37.982 
to the US dollar as of 31 December 2023, 
resulting in a significantly lower effect on the 
Group’s C1 costs than in the previous year.

In line with previous years, the Group’s 
C1 costs represent the cash cost of the 
production of iron pellets from own ore 
(‘to the mine gate’), divided by production 

volume from own ore. This excludes non-
cash costs such as depreciation, pension 
costs and inventory movements, as well as 
the costs of purchased ore, concentrate 
and gravel. The C1 cash cost of production 
(US dollars per tonne) is regarded as an 
Alternative Performance Measure (“APM”).

Breakdown of C1 costs
C1 costs in 2023 were down by 8% in 2023 
to US$76.5 per tonne, with this decrease 
principally related to the reduction in the 
unit cost of energy such as natural gas 
and fuel (principally diesel), partially offset 
by higher electricity costs in Ukraine. This 
change is demonstrated in the chart on the 
right, with energy-related costs comprising 
48% of our C1 costs (2022: 49%). 

The considerable reduction of the proportion 
for natural gas and sunflower husks, driven 
by a significant decrease of the prices for 
gas on the global markets, was offset by the 
increase of the proportion for the electricity, 
driven by higher prices in Ukraine. See 
section “C1 cash cost of production” for 
further information on price changes.

The increase of the proportion for materials 
and personnel is the net effect from the 
flat fixed component and the higher local 
inflation, partially offset by the effects from the 
devaluation of the local currency in Ukraine.

In light of the ongoing war in Ukraine 
resulting in lower production activities, 
the Group scaled further back on the 
maintenance and repair programme for 
its mining and processing equipment.

Selling and distribution costs
Total selling and distribution costs decreased 
to US$161 million in 2023 (2022: US$236 
million), mainly reflecting lower sales via 
seaborne markets due to the unavailable 
Black Sea ports in Ukraine, but also due to 
the overall lower sales volume in 2023. As a 
result, CFR sales volume decreased to 168 
thousand tonnes, compared to 1,218 thousand 
tonnes in 2022, reducing the international 
freight costs from these sales by US$51 
million. However, international freight costs 
in 2023 were also affected by higher freight 
costs for the export of some of the Group’s 
products through an alternative Black Sea 
ports, with some of the services provided by 
the Group’s barging subsidiary First-DDSG.

Seaborne logistics routes are generally the 
lowest cost and most efficient way for delivering 
the Group’s products to its customers. Since 
the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Group 
has established new logistics routes and 
relationships with alternative logistics providers 
and port operators. These routes rely heavily 
on rail, where capacity is restricted and 
demand is high from other industries, and also 
on river barges, which combined are more 
expensive. Although the situation generally 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
28

Financial Review continued

improved in 2023 compared to 2022, the 
Ukrainian rail network continues to be under 
pressure to handle goods otherwise exported 
via Ukraine’s Black Sea ports. This is further 
exacerbated by the long journey time through 
Ukraine’s western borders. Whilst improving, 
the journey time is still slightly longer than 
before the war, resulting in a negative impact 
on the Group’s cash conversion cycle.

Applicable rail tariffs remained unchanged 
in 2023, after a 70% increase in July 2022 
for 20 types of cargo – even when using the 
Group’s own rail wagons. The effect from 
the higher tariffs was however partially offset 
in US dollar terms due to the significant 
depreciation of the local currency in July 2022.

General and administrative expenses
General, administrative and other expenses 
in 2023 remained stable at US$64 million 
compared to 2022. Positive impacts from 
effective cost management and savings 
have, however, been offset by higher legal 
costs relating to Group’s ongoing legal 
disputes. See Note 30 Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes to the 
Consolidated Financial Statements for further 
information on the ongoing legal challenges 
and disputes of the Group in Ukraine.

Other operating expenses 
Other operating expenses decreased from 
US$310 million in 2022 to US$29 million 
in 2023, predominantly due to a non-cash 
impairment loss of US$254 million recorded 
in the first half of 2022 on the Group’s 
non-current operating assets, including 
property, plant and equipment, goodwill and 
intangible assets, and other non-current 
assets. The recorded impairment loss in 
2022 resulted from the Group’s lower cash 
flow generation and higher war-related 
discount rate. The Group’s non-current 
operating assets have been tested again for 
impairment as at 31 December 2023 based 
on the Group’s latest long-term model. The 
impairment test performed did not result in 
an additional impairment loss or a partial or 
full reversal of the recorded impairment loss. 

Ukrainian hryvnia vs. US dollar2

UAH per USD

Spot 15.04.24

39.399

Opening rate 01.01.23

36.568

Closing rate 31.12.23

37.982

Average 2023

36.574

Average 2022
32.342

Key Financial Performance Indicators

US$ million (unless stated otherwise)

Total pellet production (kt)

Sales volumes (kt)

Iron ore price (65% Fe Index, US$/t)1

Revenue

C1 cash cost of production (US$/t)

Underlying EBITDA A

Underlying EBITDA A margin

Debt servicing

Capital investmentA

Closing net cash

Currency
Ferrexpo prepares its accounts in US 
dollars. The functional currency of the 
Group’s operations in Ukraine is the 
Ukrainian hryvnia, as approximately two 
thirds of the Group’s operating costs are 
historically denominated in local currency. 

As a result of the significant balance in foreign 
currencies currently held by the NBU, the local 
currency remained relatively stable until the 
end of 2023, compared to a depreciation of the 
Ukrainian hryvnia by 34% during the financial 
year 2022. The Ukrainian hryvnia remained 
unchanged at 36.568 to the US dollar from 
21 July 2022 to 3 October 2023, when the 
National Bank of Ukraine (“NBU”) lifted the 
peg in place since the devaluation of the 
local currency from 29.255 to 36.568 (34%). 
With a continuation of Martial Law during 
2023, the NBU has maintained significant 
currency and capital controls in Ukraine. 
These measures limit the possibility to convert 
balances in local currency into US dollars, 
and the ability to transfer US dollars between 
onshore and offshore accounts of the Group. 
See Note 30 Commitments, contingencies 
and legal disputes to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements for further information.

Operating and non-operating foreign 
exchange gains/losses
Given that the functional currency of the 
Ukrainian subsidiaries is the hryvnia, a 
depreciation of the hryvnia against the US 
dollar results in a foreign exchange gains 
on the Group’s Ukrainian subsidiaries’ US 
dollar denominated receivable balances from 
the sale of pellets. The operating foreign 
exchange gains were US$31 million in 2023 
compared to a gain of US$339 million in 
2022, when the hryvnia depreciated by 34%.

As for the operating foreign exchange gains, 
the non-operating foreign exchange losses are 
mainly due to the depreciation of the hryvnia 
against the US dollar. The non-operating 
foreign exchange lossed decreased from 
US$63 million in 2022 to US$8 million in 2023 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

2023

3,845

4,174

132

652

76.5

130

20%

0

101

108

2022

YoY change

6,053

6,183

139

1,248

83.3

765

61%

42

161

106

(36%)

(32%)

(5%)

(48%)

(8%)

(83%)

(41pp)

(100%)

(37%)

2%

and is primarily related to the translation of 
US dollar denominated loan payable balances 
of the Group’s Ukrainian subsidiaries.

For further information on the operating 
foreign exchange gains and the non-operating 
foreign exchange losses, please see Note 
9 Foreign exchange gains and losses to 
the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Underlying EBITDA
Despite the loss for the year, underlying EBITDA 
remained positive in 2023, but decreased by 
83% to US$130 million, mainly due to lower 
operational performance as a result of the 
war and lower operating foreign exchange 
gains in 2023 compared to 2022. The effect of 
US$131 million of provisions recognised as at 
31 December 2023 for ongoing legal disputes 
is considered as an exceptional item and is 
therefore excluded from the Group’s underlying 
EBITDA. In agreement with the Group’s 
definition of the underlying EBITDA (see page 
236 in the Alternative Performance Measures 
“APMs” section), the Group’s underlying EBITDA 
includes operating foreign exchange gains of 
US$31 million in 2023 compared to US$339 
million in 2022. These foreign exchange 
differences are predominantly dependent on 
the fluctuation of the exchange rate of the 
Ukrainian hryvnia against the US dollar.

Additionally, the decrease of the underlying 
EBITDA is also affected by a decrease of the 
sales volumes by 32% and realised prices by 
21%, driven by lower benchmark iron ore fines 
price and pellet premiums in 2023, partially 
offset by an 8% decrease in C1 costs.

Net finance expense
The Group’s finance expenses remained stable 
at US$5 million compared to US$4 million 
in 2022. The vast majority of the expense 
is related to the calculated interest on the 
Group’s pension scheme, without any cash 
outflow effects, and to bank charges. With the 

1.  Source: S&P Global Commodity Insights.
2.  Source: National Bank of Ukraine.

29

WE ARE DETERMINED

Volodymyr Plotnikov and Iryna Mokhtan

What is the biggest impact the  
war has had on your jobs?
The war has reduced our ability to plan 
with as much confidence as we used to. 
Nevertheless, we realise the importance 
of our work and how it contributes to 
the sustainability of the Company in the 
current circumstances. So we continue 
working without losing optimism.

What do you look forward to most 
about your job when the war ends?
During the war we’ve acquired new 
knowledge and skills and learnt to be 
more resourceful, all of which have 
enhanced our performance. We look 
forward to applying what we have learnt 
to post-war scenarios as Ferrexpo regains 
leadership in the industrial sector and 
contributes to Ukraine’s recovery.

The Project Management Office 
Reporting Team are part of the 
finance function based at FPM. 
Their work is broad, involved in 
all aspects of financial and ESG 
reporting and modelling. Managed 
by Volodymyr and supported by 
Irina, their work supports all the 
functions of the business across 
all our offices worldwide.

How has the war changed how you 
perform your work?
On the one hand the war has reduced 
our productive working hours due to 
interruptions from air raids. On the other 
hand, our work load has increased as we 
are required to prepare more calculations 
more frequently, to model changing 
scenarios. To an extent, this has helped 
to shift the focus from the negative news 
and adapt to the new working conditions, 
but also to increase personal productivity.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

exception of lease liabilities, the Group does 
not have any outstanding interest-bearing 
loans and borrowings, therefore there are no 
interest expenses incurred on finance facilities.

At the same time, interest income increased 
five-fold to US$5 million compared to US$1 
million in 2022 as the Group invested the 
available funds in deposits due to the rise in 
interest rates on the global financial markets.

Further details on finance expense are 
disclosed in Note 10 Net finance expense 
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income tax
In 2023, the Group’s income tax expense 
was US$16 million (2022: US$119 million). The 
effective tax rate for 2023 was 26.1% (2022: 
35%). The effective tax rate for the financial 
year 2023 was affected by effects from the 
recognition of provisions for legal disputes in 
Ukraine totalling US$131 million, which are not 
tax deductible and an additional allowance of 
US$10 million on deferred tax assets recognised 
by the Group’s two major subsidiaries in 
Ukraine. For further information see Note 30 
Commitments, contingencies and legal disputes 
and Note 11 Taxation. The effective tax rate 
in the comparative year was predominantly 
driven by an impairment loss of US$254 million 
on the Group’s non-current operating assets, 
which is not tax deductible in Ukraine. 

In 2023, the income tax paid by the Group 
totalled US$13 million (2022: US$110 million), of 
which US$12 million was paid in Ukraine (2022: 
US$91 million). The income tax paid includes 
withholding tax considered as income tax paid.

Further details on taxation are 
disclosed in Note 11 Taxation to the 
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Items excluded from 
underlying earnings
The underlying EBITDA in the comparative 
year was adjusted by the impairment loss 
of US$254 million recorded in 2022 as a 
result of a reduction in the carrying value 
of the Group’s assets in Ukraine due to 
the war. The impairment test performed 
as of 31 December 2023 did not result in 
an additional impairment loss or a partial 
or full reversal of the recorded impairment 
loss. See Note 13 Plant, property and 
equipment to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements for more information. 

As announced on 29 January 2024, following 
subsequent and unexpected events in Ukraine 
in relation to a claim against one of the Group’s 
Ukrainian subsidiaries, the Group recorded 
a provision for legal disputes in the amount 
of US$124 million (UAH4,727 million). The 
provision is in respect of a contested sureties 
claim lost in a court of appeal in Ukraine. The 
Group’s subsidiary in Ukraine filed a cassation 
appeal to the Supreme Court of Ukraine and 

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS30

Financial Review continued

the first hearing scheduled for 20 March 2024 
did not take place as the presiding judge 
recused himself. Following the appointment 
of a new panel of judges, on 1 April 2024 
the Supreme Court suspended the possible 
enforcement of the decision of the court of 
appeal. A Supreme Court hearing on 17 April 
2024 considered primarily procedural matters 
and the next court hearing is scheduled for 
27 May 2024. Further to that, the Group also 
recognised a provision in the amount of US$4 
million (UAH136 million) following a negative 
decision from a court of appeal in respect 
of a claim made by two former minority 
shareholders of one of the Group’s major 
subsidiaries in Ukraine. The effect of the total 
provisions recognised as at 31 December 
2023 in the amount of US$131 million for the 
above-mentioned legal disputes is considered 
as an exceptional item and is therefore 
excluded from the Group’s underlying EBITDA. 

For further information see Note 
30 Commitments, contingencies 
and legal disputes.

Loss for the year
The Group’s result for the financial year 
2023 is a loss of US$85 million, mainly 
resulting from the recognition of provisions 
for ongoing legal proceedings and disputes 
in Ukraine totalling US$131 million as at 
31 December 2023. Without the effect from 
these provisions, the result for the financial 
year 2023 would have been a profit of US$46 
million, compared to US$220 million in 2022, 
reflecting a 82% decrease in the Group’s 
operating profit as a result of the ongoing 
war, as well as significantly lower net foreign 
exchange gains of US$23 million in 2023, 
compared to US$276 million in 2022. 

Cash flows and cash and 
cash equivalents
Operating cash flow before changes in working 
capital decreased by 76% to US$103 million 
compared to US$434 million in the previous 
year. The lower operating cash flow generation 
is driven by the Group’s lower operating profit. 
There was an overall working capital inflow 
of US$13 million compared to an outflow of 
US$20 million in 2022. The inflow in 2023 
largely reflects the increase of the trade 
receivable balance due to increased sales 
volumes in the last two months of 2023, the 
significant decrease of the inventories as a 
result of the Group’s destocking activities 
and positive effect from regular VAT refunds 
received in 2023, resulting in a significant 
decrease of the outstanding VAT balance 
in Ukraine as at 31 December 2023. 

The lower net cash flow from operating 
activities of US$101 million, compared to 
US$301 million in 2022, was considered by the 
Group in its capital allocation, including capital 
expenditure and shareholder returns, and 
exceptional bail payments for four managers 

of one of our subsidiaries in Ukraine in 2023. 
See sections below for further information.

Despite the lower overall cash flow 
generation, the Group managed to 
maintain its closing balance of cash and 
cash equivalents at US$115 million as of 
31 December 2023, compared to US$113 
million as of 31 December 2022.

The balance of cash and cash equivalents 
held in Ukraine amounts to US$11 million 
as at 31 December 2023 (31 December 
2022: US$45 million). Following the adopted 
Martial Law in Ukraine, the National Bank of 
Ukraine (“NBU”) has introduced significant 
currency and capital control restrictions in 
Ukraine. These measures are affecting the 
Group in terms of its cross-border payments 
to be made, which are restricted and may 
be carried out only in exceptional cases. For 
further information see Note 30 Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes to the 
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Capital investment
Capital expenditure in 2023 totalled US$101 
million compared to US$161 million in 2022. 
Of the total amount spent in 2023, sustaining 
and modernisation capital expenditure 
was US$31 million (2022: US$57 million), 
covering the activities at all of the Group’s 
major business units. Due to the ongoing 
operational and logistics constraints as 
a result of the ongoing war in Ukraine, 
the Group further reduced the level of its 
investments in sustaining capital expenditure 
projects, by reviewing and optimising the 
level and timing of its repair activities. 

The Group also reconsidered the timing of its 
strategic development projects resulting in a 
reduction of the related capital expenditure to 
US$70 million, compared to US$104 million 
in 2022. As such, major projects advanced in 
2023 include US$22 million spent on stripping 
activities for future production growth and 
US$13 million spent on the enhancement of 
the Group’s press filtration complex, which will 
help raise pelletising capacity in the near term 
once operations return to full capacity. The 
Group continued to invest US$22 million in the 
concentrator and pelletiser projects as part of 
the Wave 1 Expansion Programme to manage 
previously entered commitments and also spent 
US$3 million in the development and exploration 
of the Belanovo deposit, as well as US$1 million 
in a hydrolysis plant for the trial of hydrogen use 
as a fuel in the Group’s pelletiser. For further 
information on the Group’s activities to grow 
its business in 2023, please see page 19. 

Considering the lower cash flow generation no 
ordinary dividends were paid during the 2023 
calendar year (2022 total: 13.2 US cents or 
US$155 million). The Group has a shareholder 
returns policy outlining the Group’s intention 
to deliver up to 30% of free cash flows as 
dividends in respect of a given year. The Group 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

has announced on 18 January 2024 an interim 
dividend of 3.3 US cents for the financial year 
2023, reflecting that the Group performed well 
in the second half of 2023, which was due for 
payment to the shareholders on 23 February 
2024. Following subsequent and unexpected 
events in Ukraine relating to a claim against 
one of the Group’s Ukrainian subsidiaries, the 
Group announced on 20 February 2024 the 
decision to withdraw this interim dividend. For 
further information see Note 30 Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes.

Debt and maturity profile
Ferrexpo has maintained a strong balance 
sheet in 2023, including the absence of gross 
debt and the net cash position of US$108 
million as at 31 December 2023 (2022: US$106 
million). With the exception of lease liabilities, 
the Group does not have any outstanding 
interest-bearing loans and borrowings 
as of 31 December 2023 and 2022.

As of 31 December 2023, the credit ratings 
agency Moody’s had a long-term corporate 
and debt rating for Ferrexpo of Caa3, with a 
negative outlook. The credit ratings agency 
Fitch maintains a CCC+ with a negative 
outlook rating on the Group. While the 
credit rating of Ferrexpo is capped by the 
sovereign credit rating of Ukraine, the ceilings 
for credit ratings ascribed to Ferrexpo by 
Moody’s and Fitch are higher (one notch 
above sovereign, Ca, for Moody’s and three 
notches above sovereign, CC, for Fitch). In 
December 2023, S&P reinstated the Credit 
Rating of Ferrexpo at CCC, at the same level 
with the sovereign credit rating of Ukraine.

Related party transactions
The Group enters into arm’s length transactions 
with entities under the common control of 
Kostyantin Zhevago and his associates. 
All these transactions are considered to 
be in the ordinary course of business.

During the financial year 2023, the Group 
made bail payments totalling US$15 
million on behalf of four members of the 
top management of one of the Group’s 
subsidiaries in Ukraine in respect of various 
legal actions and ongoing court proceedings 
initiated by certain governmental bodies 
against the Group’s subsidiaries and 
members of the top management in Ukraine. 
See also below under Contingent liabilities 
and legal disputes and Note 34 Related 
party disclosures to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements for further details.

Contingent liabilities and 
legal disputes
The Group is exposed to risks associated with 
operating in a developing economy during a 
time of war and the current circumstances 
facing the Group’s controlling shareholder. 
As a result, the Group is subject to various 
legal actions and ongoing court proceedings 

31

WE ARE DETERMINED

Dmitriy Kampaniets and Daria Leschenko

The translation and interpretation 
team at Ferrexpo is an important 
and integral part of the 
organisation. The eight strong team 
collectively speak six languages. 
They work not only on site dealing 
with technical aspects of the 
business, but also travel with 
management to provide support 
during technical visits, events and 
trainings, and critically, during 
business negotiations.

As the war progresses, what has 
changed in your job function?
There is a stronger sense of unity. We 
are one people with one enemy, so we 
should not have discord among ourselves. 
Accordingly we’ve noticed that there is 
more empathy and a desire to help each 
other at work. We aim to complete our 
work professionally and quickly, which 
means that mutual assistance with 
colleagues has significantly strengthened.

What is the biggest impact the war  
has had on your job?
The war has hardened our characters, 
like pellets in a kiln. We want to contribute 
as much as possible to victory. Seeing 
how the Company is facing so many 
challenges, we have come to understand 
the importance of our work: the correct 
interpretation with foreign specialists helps 
colleagues make the right decisions faster; 
the correct translation of an equipment 
operating manual helps with proper 
maintenance and lower costs. We do 
everything to be as useful as possible 
for the Company and for Ukraine.

What do you look forward to most 
about your job when the war ends?
When the war ends, we will welcome 
the return of our employee warriors. 
We relish the time when there is more 
live communication in our work, so 
that we can see the versatility and 
application of knowledge and skills so 
that the Company can grow again.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

initiated by different government agencies in 
Ukraine. There is a risk that the independence 
of the judicial system and its immunity from 
economic and political influences in Ukraine is 
not upheld, consequently Ukrainian legislation 
might be inconsistently applied to resolve the 
same or similar disputes. As a result, the Group 
is exposed to a number of higher risk areas 
than those typically expected in a developed 
economy, which require a significant portion 
of critical judgements to be made by the 
management. In respect of the contested 
sureties claim, if the final Supreme Court ruling 
is not in favour of FPM, the claimant may take 
steps to appoint either a state or a private 
bailiff and request the commencement of the 
enforcement procedures, which could have 
a material negative impact on the Group’s 
business activities and its ability to continue 
as a going concern, as the assets of FPM 
could be seized or subject to a forced sale. 
In addition to the afore-mentioned claim, a 
supplier and related party to the Group filed by 
an application to open bankruptcy proceedings 
(“creditor protection proceedings”) against 
the Group’s major subsidiary in Ukraine. The 
possible commencement of the enforcement 
of the decision of the Ukrainian court of 
appeal, which is currently suspended by 
a decision of the Supreme Court, and the 
possible opening of creditor protection 
proceedings might potentially affect the 
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

See Note 2 Basis of preparation and Note 
30 Commitments, contingencies and legal 
disputes to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements as well as the Principal Risks 
section on pages 72 to 90 for further details.

Going concern
As at the date of the approval of these 
Consolidated financial statements, the war is 
still ongoing and poses a significant threat to 
the Group’s mining, processing and logistics 
operations within Ukraine. As a result, a 
material uncertainty still remains as some of 
the uncertainties remain outside of the Group 
management’s control, with the duration and 
the impact of the war still unable to be predicted 
at this point of time. In addition to the war-
related material uncertainty, the Group is also 
exposed to the risks associated with operating 
in a developing economy, which may or may not 
be exacerbated by the war and/or the current 
circumstances facing the Group’s controlling 
shareholder (see Ukraine country risk on pages 
75 to 79). As a result, the Group is exposed 
to a number of risk areas that are heightened 
compared to those expected in a developed 
economy, such as an environment of political, 
fiscal and legal uncertainties, which represents 
another material uncertainty as at the approval 
of these consolidated financial statements. 

See Note 2 Basis of preparation to the 
Consolidated Financial Statements 
for further information.

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS32

Responsible Business Review

As the war in Ukraine protracts, 
we continue to prioritise our workforce  
and the communities where we operate. 
However, we must also keep sight of our 
broader sustainability and environmental 
objectives, so that we continue to 
contribute to the global steel industry’s 
pathway to low emissions.

Natalie Polischuk
Chair, Health, Safety, 
Environment and Community 
(“HSEC”) Committee

In this section, I would like to present the 
report on the work of HSEC Committee 
for 2023, having been appointed Chair of 
the Committee in May 2023. The activities 
of HSEC Committee include oversight of 
Ferrexpo’s policies and strategic supervision 
of management systems aimed at achieving 
the health and safety of our employees, 
supporting the communities in which we 
operate and managing environmental risks. 
As a responsible business, we have an 
important role to play in supporting society 
and the economy, and also as a trusted 
environmental steward. As a public company 
quoted on the London Stock Exchange, 
adhering to strict international governance 
and environmental standards, we are an 
established example of how to operate to 
global standards in a Ukrainian context. 

People first
Amid wartime conditions, we continue 
to prioritise safety and wellbeing 
of our employees, as their lives are 
the top priority for Ferrexpo. 

The full-scale war has had a significant 
impact on Ferrexpo people. Since February 
2022, a total of 754 of our employees have 
been drafted to serve in the Armed Forces 
of Ukraine, while 35 tragically lost their lives 
defending the country. Our approach has been 
to do everything possible in the circumstances 
to help our employees and their families. 

We have established a comprehensive 
support programme providing material, 
medical, psychological and employment 
assistance for both those drafted to the 
Armed Forces and the returning veterans. 

While no one in Ukraine, including our 
employees, can be absolutely safe amid 
full-scale war and frequent missile attacks on 
the region, we are doing everything possible 
to protect the safety of our workforce and 
wider community, for example the provision 
of safe childcare and bomb shelters for 
employees and their children in local schools. 
Such support is conducted through Ferrexpo 
Humanitarian Fund, which was established 
in February 2022 and has initiated over 
100 projects and initiatives. Each project is 
approved by the HSEC Committee to ensure 
good governance in the approval process. 
Examples of projects supported include 
providing accommodation, meals, donating 
vehicles and equipment, and providing medical 
support. At the same time, we continue to 
implement our critical long-term safety at 
workplace initiatives, such as training to 
eliminate the most common types of high-
risk incidents at the production sites. 

While needs change as the war prolongs, 
our people want to be continuously employed 
in a safe manner, and live in a community 
that fosters their wellbeing. Ferrexpo Charity 
Fund, which has been providing direct 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

US$25M

Total humanitarian support provided 
to date, including the Ferrexpo 
Humanitarian Fund and associated 
CSR funding, assisting more 
than 100 individual projects.

support to local communities for more than 
12 years now, continues to work together 
with stakeholders, including local authorities, 
residents and public organisations, to 
develop and implement social projects.

While placing primary importance on 
protecting the safety of our employees, 
we also strive more widely to foster a trust-
based work environment, exhibiting zero 
tolerance for discrimination based on any 
personal attributes. We remain dedicated 
to safeguarding labour and human rights 
throughout the business, in line with UN 
Sustainable Development Goals. 

33

Advancing sustainability initiatives 
and climate change
It is important that we don’t lose sight of our 
sustainability commitments, however at the 
same time, we must acknowledge that the war 
is affecting how we will need to consider our 
long-term decarbonisation roadmap. Whilst 
significant investments cannot be made at 
the moment and some of the initiatives and 
projects are currently suspended due to war, 
Ferrexpo maintains its ongoing ecological 
approach and practices and continues to plan 
for a greener future. It is pleasing to report 
that during 2023 two significant projects were 
completed with our environmental consultants 
Ricardo plc: Life Cycle assessment 
and Double Materiality assessment.

Through working with Ricardo, Ferrexpo 
aims to further develop its forward-looking 
understanding around climate change and 
the Group’s pathway to net-zero emissions 
and a clear picture of iron ore pellets in the 
decarbonisation of the global steel industry. 

The Life Cycle assessment independently 
verified that when a steel manufacturer 
uses Ferrexpo DR pellets, in an electric arc 
furnace, to produce a tonne of steel billet, 
37% less carbon is emitted compared to 
traditional steel production methods.

This is significant for Ferrexpo because 
it establishes the critical role that our 
products play in enabling the transition to 
lower carbon steel production. During the 
year ahead, we plan to undertake further 
studies to understand more about our other 
products, and work with some of our premium 
steel customers in Europe to assess other 
opportunities to decarbonise further.

The Double Materiality assessment combines 
impact materiality with financial materiality, 
providing a more in-depth analysis of what 
issues are material to us as an organisation. 
The results demonstrated that topics relating 
to governance and responsible business 
were considered the most important by 
stakeholders, closely followed by our role 
in enabling the transition to green steel and 
how we can ensure ongoing employment 
for our workforce. Sustainability risks 
cannot be considered in isolation. As 
part of the project, we engaged senior 
managers of the Group in the discussion 
on their integrated strategies for managing 
sustainability risks and opportunities. 

Responsible business and 
sustainability reporting
In 2023, we published our eighth 
Responsible Business Report, which 
can be found on our website. The report 
provided a comprehensive overview of our 
sustainability initiatives and performance 
across many of the standards under the 
framework published by the Global Reporting 
Initiative. It also provided an opportunity 
to highlight some of the remarkable 
achievements made by our colleagues 
in the most difficult of circumstances.

Our stated target is to reduce carbon Scope 
1 and 2 carbon emissions by 2030 (baseline: 
2019). During 2023, our emissions fell 2% 
compared to the previous year, representing 
a 32% reduction compared to 2019. We are 
continuing to progress certain initiatives that 
will contribute to significant further reductions, 
for example, the implementation of trolley 
assist haulage systems in our mines. However, 
work on this, as for so many other projects, is 
limited to desktop optimisations at this time 
as the engineering and equipment suppliers 
are unable to visit Ukraine. It is likely that 
our carbon reduction targets will need to be 
revisited as the war prolongs. Once the war 
is over and its impact is assessed, we plan to 
return to our decarbonisation journey in full.

The remainder of this section of the 
Annual Report provides a more detailed 
assessment and reporting of the most 
important responsible business, climate 
and sustainability topics. Whilst we 
prioritise the safety and wellbeing of our 
people, we have also made progress on 
all fronts, demonstrating our ongoing 
responsible contribution to society, the 
economy and the environment.

I would like to thank all our workforce 
for their resilience and for embracing 
the fundamental values of sustainability 
to help deliver this progress under the 
most challenging circumstances. 

Natalie Polischuk
Chair, HSEC Committee

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS34

Responsible Business: Safety

Protecting the  
safety of our people

Our workforce comprises 
over 8,000 employees 
and contractors. 95% 
of our workforce is based 
in Ukraine, with many 
currently serving in the 
armed forces. During a 
time of war, protecting 
their safety and wellbeing 
is paramount.

Health and safety performance

Safety indicators (lagging)

Fatalities

Lost time injuries

Lost time injury frequency rate (“LTIFR”)

All injuries frequency rate (“AIFR”)

Near miss events

Significant incidents

Restricted work days

Severity rate (average lost days per incident)

Safety indicators (leading)

Health and safety inspections

Health and safety meetings

Health and safety inductions

Training hours

Hazard reports

High visibility management tours

Protecting our people
At Ferrexpo, we have a global workforce 
comprising over 8,000 employees and 
contractors, and colleagues some of whom 
are currently serving in the Armed forces 
of Ukraine. 95% of the workforce is based 
in Ukraine, mainly at our operations in the 
Poltava region, but also other colleagues 
work in other functions and services in Kyiv 
and another locations across Ukraine. 

Given the scale of our workforce and 
the nature of our activities, it was never 
an option to evacuate our people during 
the war. Our people wish to and need to 
continue working. Being employed is critical 
during a time of war. Therefore, it is our 
responsibility to take extensive measures 
to protect our workforce during this time, 
both in the workplace, and, where possible, 
in the communities where they live. 

Measures taken have included remote 
working for those with suitable roles, to 
ensure that they were as far from the front 
line as possible. Measures for our on-site 
workforce have included the provision of 
air-raid shelters, adjusting shift patterns 
to align with night-time curfews and the 
provision of free meals in light of disruption 
to supply chains in local communities.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

2023

2022

Change

0

5

0.32

0.64

1

4

675

169

6,282

1,466

2,897

7,264

688

149

0

9

0.51

0.99

1

8

934

104

5,413

1,388

5,332

6,828

740

157

–

(44%)

(37%)

(35%)

–

(50%)

(28%)

63%

16%

6%

(46%)

5%

(7%)

(5%)

35

WE ARE DETERMINED

Olga Mokra, Acting CSR Manager, FPM

Corporate Social Responsibility 
is managed at a local level by a 
team of professionals. Olga started 
working at our Belanovo operation 
as a CSR Specialist in 2020, 
transferring recently to FPM as 
Acting CSR Manager.

As the war progresses, how has 
your job changed?
After the initial shock I actually found 
a real thirst to work more and to work 
harder. I joined the team managing our 
Humanitarian Fund and find the work 
immensely rewarding. Time is critical, and 
we’ve had to learn to work fast, which we 
have achieved by being united. Despite 
everything possible and impossible, 
we are able to complete our work.

What has the war taught you 
about how you do your job?
War is not the time to give in to doubt. 
It is important not to let emotions get 
in the way. The war taught me to be 
focused and balanced, and how to make 
decisions and complete actions quickly.

When the war ends, what will be 
different in your work?
Work will be different not only compared to 
how it is now, but also how it was before the 
war. So many challenges have arisen during 
this time and we have learnt to overcome 
them. I think the last thing I will want to do is 
to slow down. In fact, we will not have time 
to rest, because after the war our workload 
will likely increase as we restore Ukraine.

Zero

The Group recorded a third 
successive year without a fatality. 

In the early phases of the war, when 
uncertainty arose over the continued provision 
of social services, the Group commenced 
an on-site childcare facility for the children of 
employees, which was staffed by Ferrexpo 
volunteers, to ensure that children could be 
close by and safe during such an uncertain 
period of time. As the war evolved, the 
need for such facilities diminished as life 
began to resume in Ukraine, with schools 
opening and a ‘new normal’ beginning. 

As the conflict evolved in 2022, so did our 
response. We focused our efforts on the 
supply of key equipment such as armoured 
ambulances and food packages to towns 
along the front line. In late 2023, needs shifted 
again, and psychological wellbeing has 
become more important as people try to deal 
with the stress of living in a protracted war. 

At the time of this report, 641 of our brave 
colleagues are serving in the Armed Forces 
of Ukraine. We are proud of their efforts to 
defend Ukraine, and continue to support 
them by providing personal protective 
equipment and other essentials.

In 2023, 67 colleagues were demobilised from 
the armed forces, 46 of whom have returned 
to work. During the year, we expanded our 
support for veterans to include physical 
rehabilitation and psychological support. 
Veterans unable to return to their previous 
functions due to factors such as noise and 
vibration, are offered the opportunity to train 
and qualify for other more suitable roles.

In 2023, the Group recorded a third 
successive year without a fatality. The 
average recoded lost-time injury frequency 
rate (“LTIFR”) for the year was 0.32, an 
improvement on the 0.51 recorded last year 
and materially below the historic average.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
36

Responsible Business: Environmental Stewardship

Net Zero pathway

We recognise the importance of addressing 
climate change and the need for Ferrexpo 
to present a clear and considered approach 
towards reducing our emissions footprint.

Greenhouse gas emissions footprint and energy consumption (2023/2022)

2023 Data (% change to 2022)

2022 Data

Absolute basis  
(kilotonnes CO2e)

Unit basis  
(kg CO2e per 
tonne)

Absolute basis  

(kilotonnes CO2e)

Unit basis  
(kg CO2e per 
tonne)

Scope 1 emissions
Scope 2 emissions

Subtotal (S1+S2) 
emissions

247 (-27%)
137 (-39%)

57 (+4%)
32 (-11%)

384 (-32%)

89 (-2%)

Scope 3 emissions

5,707 (-25%) 1,326 (+7%)

Total emissions

6,092 (-26%) 1,416 (+7%)

Biofuels emissions 
(reported separately)

Energy consumption 
(kWh)

4 (-39%)

1 (-12%)

2,162,913,319 (-29%)

–

3,052,942,993

341
223 

564

7,642

8,206

6

55
36

91

1,237

1,329

1

–

‘Unit basis’ represents the intensity ratio, aligning to requirements of SECR (Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting).

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Scope 1 emissions
Scope 1 direct emissions principally relate 
to three activities at our operations – diesel 
consumption (primarily used in mining 
activities), natural gas (primarily used in 
pelletising activities) and gasoil (primarily 
used in inland waterway logistics activities). 
Collectively, these three sources of emissions 
represented 97% of Scope 1 emissions in 
2023 (2022: 97%), with emissions from the 
consumption of diesel and gasoil for transport 
making up 60% of Scope 1 emissions (2022: 
55%) and natural gas making up 37% of 
Scope 1 emissions (2022: 43%). In addition, 
we track a further 15 sources of Scope 1 
emissions across our operations, ensuring 
that multiple aspects of our operations 
are covered in our emissions estimates. 

Absolute Scope 1 emissions fell by 27% 
in 2023, in part reflecting lower production 
due to war related constraints. Scope 1 
emissions on a unit of basis rose 4%, due 
to an increased utilisation of alternative 
logistics channels for exports, which have 
resulted in an increased consumption of 
gasoil. Calculations of Scope 1 and Scope 
2 emissions have been independently 
assured for a third successive year.

Scope 2 emissions
Scope 2 indirect emissions relate exclusively 
to our purchasing of electricity from third 
parties, which is predominantly used in our 
concentrator equipment. On an absolute basis, 
this fell by 39%, also due to lower production. 
On a unit basis, Scope 2 emissions fell 
by 11% due to an increased proportion 
of electricity being sourced from cleaner 
sources including hydro and nuclear power. 

Scope 3 emissions
For Ferrexpo Scope 3 emissions primarily 
relate to the type of iron ore pellet produced, 
since the downstream processing of iron ore 
accounted for 96% of Scope 3 emissions 
in 2023. In 2022, direct reduction (“DR”) 
pellets represented 6% of all production, 
resulting in lower Scope 3 emissions for 
that year. However, in 2023, no DR pellets 
were produced. Consequently, Scope 3 
emissions in 2023 on a unit basis increased 
to 1.33tCO2/t of pellet production from 
1.24 tCO2/t of pellet production in 2022 
respectively. Absolute Scope 3 emissions 
nevertheless decreased 25% year-on-year 
due to the overall lower production in 2023.

Methodology
Ferrexpo’s methodology for calculating its 
GHG emissions footprint utilises, where 
possible, emissions factors provided by the 
Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which is in line 
with reporting requirements under the Global 
Reporting Initiatives (“GRI”) framework for 
reporting sustainability topics. Through using 
carbon factors provided by the Greenhouse 

37

WE ARE DETERMINED

Serhiy Palekha, Pelletising Plant Manager

Serhiy has worked at Ferrexpo for 
over 20 years. He started his career 
as a foreman at the FPM pellet 
production workshop. He was 
appointed manager of the 
pelletising plant at FPM in 2017.

As the war progresses, what has 
changed in your role?
After the full-scale invasion, we had to 
perform our work completely differently. 
Sometimes we operate with only 
one pelletiser line, sometimes with 
two. Sometimes we were forced to 
shut down altogether. In the first few 
months, planning for the future seemed 
incomprehensible. Before the war we 
always had planned production and for 
maintenance for years ahead. All this had 
to be adjusted as we changed the way 
we operate at a variably reduced scale.

What has the war taught you 
about how you do your job?
It became clear that the production and 
maintenance departments had to work 
closer together. Many of our colleagues 
that are skilled in maintenance and 
repair work have joined the armed 
forces. As we prepare plans to operate 
three lines, co-operation is going to 
be more important than ever that we 
work across our departments and help 
each other out whenever necessary.

When the war ends, what will be 
different for you in your job work?
When the war ends I look forward to 
the safe return of our colleagues from 
the pelletising plant who are currently 
fighting on the battle front. As we restore 
production to all four pelletiser lines, we 
will need our colleagues to return so that 
we can minimise any skills shortages.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

-2%

Scope 1 and 2 emissions fell 2% 
in 2023, in part reflecting lower 
production due to war related 
constraints.

Gas Protocol, the Group is able to provide 
carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions figures 
(“CO2e”) that also account for emissions of 
both methane (CH4) and nitrogen oxide (N2O).

Water
Our operations include multiple water cycle 
interactions, from the water ingress into our 
mines, to recycling water in our processing 
operations, to the River Dnipro, which 
flows adjacent to our operations. Testing 
of water quality has continued throughout 
2023, with any discharged water quality 
tested across more than 12 different 
chemical elements or attributes. In our 
processing plant, where water is utilised in 
the processing of iron ore, we once again 
recycled 97% of process water (2022: 98%).

Waste generation
The Group generates solid form waste in 
its mining operations (overburden in the 
form of waste rock and sand), as well as 
emissions of other gases and dust from 
its mining and processing operations.

During 2023, waste removal from 
mining activities fell by 45% due to lower 
production. It is important to note that the 
overburden and waste removed from our 
mining operations is non-hazardous and 
is stored in on-site waste dumps designed 
by our mine planning department.

Aside from greenhouse gases, gaseous 
emissions include those emitted from our 
processing operations (NO2, SO2, and CO), 
with emissions from such sources declining 
by an average of 30% during the year, in line 
with mining volumes. Dust emissions in 2023 
increased 9% compared to the previous year.

Elsewhere in our operations, we continued 
to expand our domestic waste recycling 
programme with collection bins and 
sorting facilities. All four of our main 
operating subsidiaries in Ukraine now 
have active recycling programmes.

ISO-certified systems
Ferrexpo now has an ISO-compliant 
environment management system (ISO 
14001:2015) at both FPM and FBM, with the 
latter achieving accreditation during 2022. 
This is in addition to accreditation of our 
Energy Management System (ISO 50001:2018) 
at the same two subsidiaries, with FBM 
also acquiring this accreditation in 2022.

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS38

Responsible Business: Double Materiality Assessment

In 2023, Ferrexpo continued its sustainability 
strategy on many fronts, including by proactively 
initiating a Double Materiality Assessment (“DMA”). 

The DMA has been conducted in collaboration 
with our sustainability consultants, Ricardo 
Plc, and is a process used to evaluate 
and understand the impact of Ferrexpo’s 
activities not only on our own financial 
performance (financial materiality – outside-
in) but also the impact of the Company’s 
activities on the environment and society 
(impact materiality – inside-out). Our strong 
commitment to sustainable business 
practices is evident through our proactive 
approach, ensuring compliance with 
regulations while reinforcing our responsibility 
to our employees and communities. 

We conducted the materiality assessment 
by following the guidance documents 
from the European Financial Reporting 
Advisory Group (“EFRAG”), which, at the 
time of our assessment, were in draft form. 
Additionally, we referenced the Annex 
associated with the Corporate Sustainability 
Reporting Directive (“CSRD”), which contains 
the European Sustainability Reporting 
Standards. This underscores our dedication 
to staying abreast of new sustainability 
standards and regulatory requirements, and 
adopting best practices in sustainability. 

The work involved proactively contacting 
a range of stakeholders, demonstrating 
our strong commitment and dedication to 
fostering engagement and transparency, 
even in challenging times.

Stakeholder analysis
Ferrexpo conducted a comprehensive 
stakeholder mapping exercise, identifying 
over 70 stakeholders categorised into 
11 groups, comprising both internal and 
external stakeholders. Using a matrix to 
assess stakeholder importance based 
on their interest and influence, Ferrexpo 
identified Directors and Executives (internal), 
Auditors (external), and Suppliers (external) 
as having the highest interest and influence. 
It is essential to emphasise that stakeholder 
mapping is an iterative process, allowing 
Ferrexpo to continually update and refine its 
approach to ensure effective stakeholder 
engagement and management.

Identification of material topics 
related to sustainability matters
Ferrexpo diligently collaborated to identify 
and compile a comprehensive list of 21 
sub-topics encompassing Environmental, 
Social and Governance (“ESG”) topics, while 
considering their potential impacts, risks, and 
opportunities (“IROs”). This process involved 
leveraging various sources such as Ferrexpo’s 
previous impact materiality assessment (using 
the GRI universal standard for reporting), 
European Sustainability Reporting Standards 
(ESRS) 1 AR16, international and sector-
specific standards (International Financial 
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), Sustainability 
Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”)), ESG 
raters, regulations and competitor analysis. 
This meticulous approach ensured that 
our sustainability strategy is well informed, 
addressing both financial and multi-
stakeholder sustainability matters that are 
critical for both Ferrexpo and our stakeholders.

Materiality assessment process

Our materiality assessment process in 2023 included the following: 

STAKEHOLDER 
ANALYSIS

IDENTIFICATION 
OF MATERIAL 
TOPICS

STAKEHOLDER 
ENGAGEMENT

IMPACT 
MATERIALITY

FINANCIAL 
MATERIALITY

DOUBLE 
MATERIALITY 
MATRIX

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

39

and perspectives of colleagues in Ukraine 
during a time of war. By understanding the 
needs and experiences of our workforce 
during this challenging period, we will better 
adapt and respond to their concerns.

Additionally, we interviewed a total of 17 
internal and external stakeholders, including 
Directors and Executives from Ferrexpo, 
auditors, bank institutions, brokers, customers, 
NGOs, suppliers, trade associations, and 
investors. These interviews helped to further 
identify and validate the potential material ESG 
topics from an impact perspective (external 
interviews), risks and opportunities from a 
financial perspective (internal interviews with 
Directors and Executives), as well as provide 
context on external stakeholder views and 
expectations related to the ESG topics. 

Impact materiality
We rigorously assessed our direct and 
indirect impact on both the environment 
and society, under the guidance of our 
sustainability consultants, Ricardo Plc. To 
ensure comprehensiveness, the results of the 
stakeholder questionnaire were applied to 
an impact materiality scoring assessment to 
evaluate the scale of actual and/or potential 
negative and positive impacts from their 
perspective, considering both perceived 
impact and scope (i.e. how widespread 
the impact is). We further conducted an 
internal assessment that considered the 
extent and potential for irremediability of the 
actual negative impacts. Under the EFRAG 
guidance, materiality is based on the severity 
of the impact, which considers scale, scope, 
irremediability as it relates to actual impacts, 
including likelihood for potential impacts. 

Stakeholder engagement
Internal and external stakeholders were invited 
to complete an online materiality questionnaire. 
A total of 156 internal and external responses 
were captured in both English and Ukrainian. 
The online questionnaire asked respondents to 
rank the impact of the Ferrexpo’s activities on 
the selected ESG sub-topics. The information 
gathered from both internal and external 
stakeholders, including their ranked impact, 
directly informed the materiality of the topics.

This analysis revealed that both our internal 
and external stakeholders have a profound 
interest in Social and Governance issues, 
specifically focusing on areas such as 
Employee Health and Safety, Employee Rights 
and Training, Employment and Turnover, 
Responsible Business, and Corporate 
Governance. Of particular note is the 
internal stakeholder feedback we received, 
which predominantly originated from within 
Ukraine. This ‘bottom-up’ response provided 
a valuable snapshot of the sentiments 

Ferrexpo 2023 Double Materiality Matrix

Y
T
I
L
A
I
R
E
T
A
M

T
C
A
P
M
I

L
A
C
I
T
I
R
C

T
N
A
C
I
F
I
N
G
I
S

T
N
A
T
R
O
P
M
I

E
V
I
T
A
M
R
O
F
N
I

1.1

1.9

2.7

3.3

3.4

1.5

2.1

2.8

1.2

1.6

1.7

2.3

2.6

1.8

2.4

3.2

1.3

2.2

2.5

3.1

1.4

INFORMATIVE

IMPORTANT

SIGNIFICANT

CRITICAL

FINANCIAL MATERIALITY

Key

 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

1.1   Air Quality and GHG emissions
1.2   Biodiversity
1.3   Climate Change
1.4   Energy Management and Sourcing
1.5   Green Technologies
1.6   Land Use
1.7   Pollution
1.8   Resource Management
1.9   Water and Waste Management

 SOCIAL ISSUES

2.1   Community
2.2   Conflict Risk
2.3   Diversity and Inclusion
2.4   Employee Health and Safety
2.5   Employee Rights and Training
2.6   Employment and Turnover
2.7   Green Steel
2.8   Supply Chain Management

 GOVERNANCE ISSUES

3.1   Corporate Governance
3.2   Data Privacy and Security
3.3   Responsible Business
3.4   Risk and Compliance

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
40

Responsible Business: Double Materiality Assessment continued

To validate the accuracy and robustness 
of our assessments, moderation sessions 
were conducted internally, followed by 
additional sessions with our stakeholders. 
These sessions fostered dialogue and 
ensured consensus on final scores, 
culminating in a comprehensive and 
reliable materiality assessment.

Financial materiality
To perform the financial materiality, we 
identified and evaluated the risks and 
opportunities associated with each 
sustainability sub-topic. To achieve this, 
an initial list of risks and opportunities was 
compiled for each sustainability sub-topic, 
drawing influence from internal and external 
reputable sources to ensure all relevant 
financial aspects were considered when 
defining sustainability sub-topics. These 
sources included the Capitals Coalition, 
TCFD and SASB, Ferrexpo’s risk register 
and internal stakeholder interviews. A final 
financial materiality score for sustainability 
sub-topics was derived by aggregating the 
averages of likelihood of occurrence and 
monetary impact (financial magnitude) scores 
for each associated risk and opportunity. 
These scores were then categorised 
into levels such as Minimal, Informative, 
Important, Significant, or Critical.

Additionally, as recommended by EFRAG, 
each sub-topic was assigned a Dependencies 
on Capitals, evaluating how different 
forms of capital (such as financial, natural, 
human, social, and manufactured) can 
impact both financial and sustainability 
performance. This provided valuable insights 
into their interconnectedness with our 
Company activities. To ensure accuracy and 
comprehensiveness, these rankings were 
shared and verified during a concluding 
Impact and Financial Materiality Workshop. 
This collaborative effort ensured that all 
potential financial impacts on the Company 
were adequately considered and addressed.

Double Materiality results
The results from both the impact materiality 
assessment and the financial materiality 
assessment have been consolidated to 
form Ferrexpo’s Double Materiality Matrix.

Based on the Double Materiality Matrix, nine 
material topics were identified, shown in the 
upper green corner. The materiality threshold 
was meticulously examined to gauge the 
probability and potential financial impacts 
across short-, medium-, and long- term 
horizons. This evaluation was integrated with 
our enterprise risk management framework 
to identify, examine and agree on the 
potential financial effects. The threshold 
was established collectively through internal 
stakeholder consensus. Moving forward, 
we will continue to refine these thresholds, 
particularly, as we update our risk register, 
aiming to introduce suitable quantitative criteria 
where applicable. These nine topics are, 
therefore, considered material to Ferrexpo:

Category

Topics

Environment Climate Change

Environment Green Technologies

Environment Resource Management

Social

Social

Social

Employee Health & Safety

Employment & Turnover

Green Steel

Governance Corporate Governance

Governance Data Privacy & Security

Governance Responsible Business

We recognise the utmost importance of 
prioritising our employees’ health and safety, 
especially within the context of an ongoing 
war. The Double Materiality Matrix reinforces 
our corporate focus on these critical areas. 
This assessment serves as a testament to 
the determination of our team at this time, 
reflecting their sentiments and expectations. 
As we navigate through these challenges, we 
remain strong in our commitment to ensuring 
the wellbeing of our employees. We are 
determined to continue providing support and 
resources to safeguard their health and safety.

The insights derived from this assessment 
will play a pivotal role in preparing Ferrexpo 
for compliance with the CSRD and related 
ESRS. We are committed to bridging any 
gaps and strengthening our metrics, targets, 
policies, and action plans with renewed focus 
on these key material topic priorities. These 
findings will inform our sustainability strategy, 
guiding our efforts toward long-term value 
creation and fostering positive societal impact.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
41

WE ARE DETERMINED

Yuliya Klevova,  
HR Director

Yuliya’s career at Ferrexpo 
started in IT almost 30 years ago. 
In 1999 she transferred to HR 
working her way up to become 
the department head and more 
recently the HR Director. 

What has the war taught you 
and your colleagues?
The war has made us adapt to different 
working conditions but also unite behind 
shared goals. Managers at all levels have 
heightened their focus on the emotional 
state of their respective team members 
by introducing in-person meetings with 
colleagues, supplemented by group 
chats in messenger apps, fostering an 
environment where employees could share 
their experiences and support each other, 
thus helping them adjust their approach 
to work. We have also learned to work 
within tighter budgets, to perform more 
duties in shorter time frames, and to focus 
on the safety of the entire workforce – a 
paramount concern, which is even more 
important in these challenging times.

One of the most interesting things we 
noticed is the capacity for teams and 
individuals to mobilise and self-organise. 
For instance, within a single weekend, 
an on-site 24/7 children’s centre was 

established from scratch, with volunteers 
from across the organisation, irrespective 
of position or seniority. Another initiative 
included employees starting a theatre 
club, which provided an outlet for 
channelling pent-up energy and alleviating 
anxiety. These initiatives exemplify the 
resourcefulness of our middle-level 
managers and regular employees.

If you could do something 
differently since the war started, 
what would it be?
I wouldn’t change a thing, because I know 
that all decisions made were executed 
promptly and with due consideration for 
the welfare of all our colleagues. Amidst 
the backdrop of war, our responsibilities 
extend beyond our daily tasks to encompass 
the preservation of our people’s mental 
well-being. Despite the challenges 
posted by frequent sirens signalling air 
raid alerts and the constant stream of 
distressing news, it is clear to us that 
people want to work while their relatives 
and colleagues are on the frontlines fighting 
for the independence of our country. 

How will the end of the war affect 
you and your colleagues?
The challenge of securing skilled people 
is looming, but we are already taking 
proactive steps to address this. Initiatives 
include conducting career guidance work 

among young adults and encouraging 
participation in the Ferrexpo scholarship 
programme. We also offer current 
employees the opportunity to expand their 
skills by taking appropriate training courses 
at the Center of Technical Expertise, or to 
pursue higher education to advance their 
careers. Another initiative involves working 
with demobilised employees, who, after 
physical and psychological rehabilitation, 
are welcome to return to their positions, 
which are being held for them during their 
service in the Armed Forces. If a veteran 
cannot return to his previous workplace for 
health reasons, he is offered another role, 
coupled with retraining if necessary. These 
measures not only strengthen individuals 
but also the Company as a whole.

We of course recognise the psychological 
consequences of Russia’s military 
aggression, resulting in many employees 
suffering from PTSD, even those that have 
not been mobilised. The war has severely 
affected numerous aspects of our once 
tranquil lives, eroding any sense of security, 
while inflicting stress and trauma. It is 
imperative that we begin addressing these 
psychological ramifications by prioritising 
the mental wellbeing of our employees 
because the impact of their psychological 
state directly influences their ongoing mental 
health and productivity in the workplace.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSIn terms of hotspots for embodied carbon, 
for both routes, the iron making stage 
has the largest contribution within the 
study, with emissions from coal and 
natural gas being the key drivers. 

The associated embodied carbon value 
of Ferrexpo DR pellets was calculated to 
be 172kg CO2 eq per tonne of DR pellets. 
Diving down into these results showed 
that energy consumption in Ferrexpo’s 
beneficiation and pelletisation processes 
are the hotspot contributors. The mining 
stage contributes 17% to the total value per 
tonne of DR pellets. Like the other stages, 
this value is driven by energy usage in 
excavation as well as embodied impacts 
of the explosives modelled in the study. 

Net Zero journey
We are using the LCA to explore how to 
drive down our impacts further, engaging 
with our downstream value chain but also 
investigating how to address hotspots 
within our own operations. The steps we 
are taking include practical and impactful 
initiatives targeted at the hotspots identified 
in our study, engaging with our customers 
to better understand and model how our 
pellets are used, and implementing a process 
of continual monitoring and improvement 
of our own data collection to enhance the 
accuracy and robustness of our results. 

While embodied carbon emissions are our 
main focus, our LCA approach is enabling 
us to drive sustainability improvements 
across a whole suite of environmental 
issues including water and waste. 

Our life cycle thinking highlights our 
commitment to sustainability, extending 
beyond our own operations to the downstream 
sectors where our products play a crucial 
role in catalysing positive change. 

42

Responsible Business: DR pellet life cycle assessment

Life Cycle 
Assessment

The Life Cycle Assessment (“LCA”)
that we completed during 2023 forms 
an important part of understanding 
our Net Zero pathway. This 
comprehensive LCA was completed 
in collaboration with environmental 
consultants Ricardo Plc to evaluate 
our contribution to the potential 
environmental impacts related to 
steel production, focusing on our 
role as iron ore pellet producers.

several iron and steel manufacturers to obtain 
data for those stages outside of our control. 
Where data was not available, reputable 
LCA databases were used to gap fill to 
ensure that all necessary impact sources 
were captured. The study was carried out 
using SimaPro software, using the widely 
used ecoinvent database for secondary 
data, and complies with ISO 14040 and 
ISO 14044, the key underlying standards 
for LCA. Furthermore, it was independently 
critically reviewed and found to be in 
accordance with these standards.

What the results show
We recognise the important role Ferrexpo 
plays in enabling the decarbonisation of the 
steel industry and we are dedicated to driving 
the industry towards greater sustainability. 
It is, therefore, gratifying to see that the 
modelled DRI-EAF route, which utilises our 
DR pellet, offers decarbonisation opportunities 
for steel manufacturers, with reductions of 
almost 40% of embodied carbon emissions 
compared to the more traditional sinter-
BF-BOF route, observed in the study. 

Method

Embodied carbon 
emissions per kg of  
SAE 1006 grade steel

Pellet-DRI-EAF route 1.35 kg CO2 eq

Sinter-BF-BOF route 2.15 kg CO2 eq

Scope and boundary
The scope of the LCA was to assess the 
cradle-to-gate environmental footprint of 
manufacturing steel billet using our DR 
(direct reduction) pellets, a crucial precursor 
to downstream steel production. The study 
compared two distinct production methods 
for SAE 1006 grade steel: a DR pellet-Direct 
Reduction Iron (“DRI”)-Electric Arc Furnace 
(“EAF”) route and a sinter-Blast Furnace 
(“BF”)-Basic Oxygen Furnace (“BOF”) method, 
the latter being the more traditional steel 
making route which relies more heavily on 
coal and coke usage, rather than natural 
gas and electricity which can be from clean 
sources. The study assessed the embodied 
carbon impacts of each route using the 
Global Warming Potential (“GWP”) indicator 
which reports in terms of carbon dioxide 
equivalents (CO2 eq.), as well as a range of 
other potential environmental impacts. 

Findings
The results show that the Ferrexpo DR pellet 
route can reduce 37% of embodied carbon 
emissions compared to the ‘traditional fossil 
based’ sinter-BF route for producing SAE 
1006 grade steel. We are using this baseline 
result as a starting point to build on, to 
address impact hotspots and further minimise 
our overall impact on climate change. 

Data sources and assumptions
In terms of the underlying data used for 
the study, we utilised historical activity data 
from 2021 (the most recent data which 
was available at the time of the study) for 
our mining, beneficiation and pelletisation 
operations, as well as collaborating with 

Breakdown for one tonne of steel from sinter-BF-BOF and pellet-DRI-EAF routes

SINTER-BF-BOF

9%

70%

21%

PELLET-DRI-EAF

23%

61%

16%

-37%

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

GWP-TOTAL, KG CO2 EQ. PER TONNE OF STEEL

  Steel making

  Iron making

  Sinter /pellet making

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

43

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures

Summary disclosure against 
TCFD recommendations

Ferrexpo’s 2023 climate-related 
financial disclosures for the purposes 
of Listing Rule 9.8.6R(8) and section 
414CB of the Companies Act 2006 are 
detailed below. Ferrexpo considers 
that it has made climate-related 
financial disclosures consistent with 
the four recommendations and 11 
recommended disclosures of the 
Task Force on Climate-Related 
Financial Disclosures (TCFD), 
covering governance, strategy, risk 
management, and metrics and targets. 
Ferrexpo recognises the importance of regularly 
updating our climate scenario analysis to ensure 
relevant, accurate and insightful information about 
our climate-related risks and opportunities. We 
remain committed to conducting a thorough update 
in the upcoming year. During this process, we will 
seek to expand the relevant quantitative evaluation of 
our climate-related risks and opportunities and 
further expand on the cross-cutting industry metrics. 
We want to assure our stakeholders that we are 
dedicated to ensuring that we provide accurate and 
insightful information about our climate-related risks 
and opportunities.

Governance 

Board oversight of climate-related 
risks and opportunities.
–  The Board of Directors has ultimate oversight 
of the Group’s strategy, including its approach 
to the effect of climate change on the Group’s 
business model. The Board considers climate-
related issues as part of its decision-making, 
including in relation to risk management, 
annual budgets and business plans.

–  Climate change was a standing 

agenda item at all five scheduled Board 
meetings throughout the year. 

–  The Health, Safety, Environment and Community 

(HSEC) Committee has been delegated 
management of climate-related issues by 
the Board. Three members of the executive 
management team serve on the HSEC Committee 
and Independent Non-executive Director Natalie 
Polischuk, the Director primarily responsible for 
climate-related matters, serves as Chair. The 
HSEC Committee met four times during the 
year (2022: four) and climate change has been 
a standing agenda item at all scheduled HSEC 
Committee meetings throughout the year. The 
HSEC Committee receives information about 
climate-related issues through activities such as 
internal briefings by members of the executive 
management team and briefings from external 
advisors. Feedback from this Committee 

on the Group’s progress on climate change 
related matters, including progress against 
climate-related goals and targets, is provided 
to the Board after each Committee meeting. 
–  The Audit Committee serves as a partner to the 
Board, diligently monitoring the organisation’s 
risk exposure and risk appetites, including in 
relation to climate-related risks, to ensure they 
align with established thresholds. Additionally, 
the Audit Committee provides an oversight 
function by reviewing the effectiveness of 
implemented risk management and control 
systems. The Audit Committee is assisted in 
its oversight role by the Group’s internal audit 
function, which undertakes both regular and ad 
hoc reviews of risk management controls and 
procedures, including in relation to climate-
related risks; the results of these reviews are 
reported to the Audit Committee. The Chair 
of the Audit Committee reports to the Board 
after each meeting on all matters within its 
duties and responsibilities, including any 
climate-related matters that were discussed.

Management’s role in assessing 
and managing climate related 
risks and opportunities.
–  The Executive Committee oversees 

implementation of the Group’s strategy 
in relation to climate change. 

–  In addition to the role of the HSEC 

Committee described above, the Group’s 
executive management team monitors and 
assesses climate-related risks through 
its risk monitoring activities as part of the 
Group’s Finance, Risk Management and 
Compliance (FRMCC) Committee, which 
met ten times in 2022 (2022: ten).

–  Further information on the FRMCC Committee 
and how management assesses and manages 
climate-related risks and opportunities is set 
out in the ‘Risk Management’ disclosures 
below and in the flowchart on page 73. 

Strategy 

Climate-related risks and opportunities 
over the short, medium, and long term
–  Climate change poses multifaceted 

risks to the mining and steel sector and 
is a Principal Risk for the Group. 

–  The Group has identified several specific climate-

related risks and opportunities through a series of 
stakeholder interviews and desk-based research. 

–  This process resulted in a shortlist of key 

potential risks and opportunities for Ferrexpo 
within different category areas, including 
transition risks associated with the transition 
to a lower carbon economy and physical 
risks arising from acute weather events or 
longer-term chronic changes to the climate.
–  Climate-related risks and opportunities were 
considered over the following time horizons: 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

short-term (less than two years), medium-term 
(more than two but less than ten years) and 
long-term (greater than ten years). The definition 
of each time horizon is broadly aligned to the 
Group’s medium-term climate change targets 
for 2030, with a ten-year window for action from 
the Group’s baseline year (2019), with short-
term and long-term horizons set at either side 
of this definition, including longer time horizons 
to 2050 and 2100 to capture the long-term 
trajectory of climate change and its potential 
impacts on the Group’s operations and strategy. 

–  We used scenario analysis to determine which 
risks and opportunities could have a material 
financial impact on our business, by evaluating 
the impacts on operating costs, ability to generate 
revenues, business interruption, supply chain 
issues and the timing of key company events and 
milestones across the selected climate scenarios. 
For further information, see the ‘Resilience based 
on climate change scenarios’ disclosures below.

–  A detailed description of the climate-related 

risks and opportunities potentially arising in the 
short, medium and long term that could have a 
material financial impact on the Group is included 
on pages 46 to 59. For each climate-related 
issue we have detailed the data required to 
analyse the financial impact on our business. 

Impact on the Ferrexpo Business 
Strategy and Financial Planning 
–  Consideration of topics relating to climate change 
is a fundamental aspect of Ferrexpo’s business 
model with the Group releasing a standalone 
report on climate change in December 2022. 
Through the work completed with sustainability 
consultants Ricardo, the Group was able 
to upgrade and broaden its suite of carbon 
emissions reduction targets see pages 36 to 37.
–  The climate-related risks and opportunities that 
have been identified through scenario analysis 
serve as the foundation for Ferrexpo’s business 
strategy and financial planning across the short, 
medium and long term time horizons set out 
above, guiding our actions and investments to 
mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities in 
alignment with our long-term sustainability goals.

–  Regular review and integration of climate-

related risks and opportunities into business 
strategy has led the Group to increase its 
focus on direct reduction pellets, which have 
a lower emissions footprint and represent 
a pathway to low emissions steelmaking. 
Ferrexpo continues to invest in research 
and to implement new technologies that are 
expected to lower Ferrexpo’s organisational 
Scope 1 and 2 emissions footprint, and 
following a successful trial, the Group now 
has its own solar power plant capacity to 
meet its minimum power requirements. 
–  Climate-related risks input into financial 

planning processes through the consideration 
of the potential carbon emissions footprint 

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS44

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

of existing and proposed operating projects 
and capital investment projects.

–  Given the current war in Ukraine and reduced 

level of operating activities in Ukraine, 
the Group is currently not assessing new 
operational or capital investment projects. 
–  Climate-related factors are expected to have 
a impact on the financial performance in 
the short to medium term due to increased 
operating costs and the need for increased 
capital investment, (for details see Note 2 Basis 
of preparation to the Consolidated financial 
statements) but present opportunities in the 
long term through the expected rise in demand 
for iron ore products that are relevant for 
low emissions steelmaking (Green Steel). 

Resilience based on climate 
change scenarios 
–  With support from Ricardo, we conducted climate 

scenario analysis in 2022 across three wide-
ranging scenarios to examine impacts over our 
selected time horizons. The climate scenarios 
were selected based on their ability to capture a 
wide spectrum of potential outcomes related to 
the rate and severity of environmental change. 
These scenarios were developed by reputable 
independent climate change authorities and 
reflect varying degrees of legislative ambition 
expected from governments in the years ahead.

–  Due to the split of transitional and physical 

risks and opportunities, two publicly available, 
scientifically recognised organisations were 
selected to assess the business impact of 
and our resilience to each material climate-
related risk and opportunity identified through 
scenario analysis under different hypothetical 
futures: the International Environment Agency 
(IEA) and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 
Change (IPCC). In total, three scenarios were 
selected across those developed by the 
IEA and IPCC. The scenarios included: 
– 

– 

– 

IEA Sustainable Development Scenario 
(SDS): a “well below” 2°C by 2100 
scenario, achieved through policies 
that adhere to the Paris Agreement. 
IEA Stated Policy Scenario (STEPS): a worst 
case, “business as usual scenario” (one of 
two modelled here). A more conservative 
benchmark whereby governments are 
assumed to not reach all announced goals. 
Instead, it takes a more granular, sector-by-
sector look at what has actually been put 
in place to reach these and other energy-
related objectives, taking account not just of 
existing policies and measures, but also a 
look at those that are under development.
IPCC SSP4: a worst case, “business as 
usual scenario” (one of two modelled here), 
in which a divided approach to climate 
change continues to widen through unequal 
investments in human capital, combined 
with increasing disparities in economic 
opportunity and political power, leading 
to increasing inequalities and stratification 
both across and within countries.

–  For a comprehensive understanding of our 
scenario analysis, see pages 43 to 59. This 
provides a detailed account of the selected 
scenarios, their respective characteristics 
and metrics, as well as a detailed table for 
each risk and opportunity, including their 
business and financial impacts, ratings 
against scenarios, geographical distribution, 
and potential strategic actions. 

–  In a time of climate uncertainty, Ferrexpo 

maintains its strong commitment to sustainability, 
striving for continuous improvement in our climate 

change strategy and the resilience of our Group. 
We are closely following the evolving risks and 
opportunities stemming from climate change for 
Ferrexpo, positioning ourselves to capitalise on 
the increasing market demand for low carbon 
emissions steel production. While regulatory shifts 
in the shipping industry may raise concerns about 
operating costs, our scenario analysis indicates 
that short-term impacts are manageable, with 
medium- and long-term risks being monitored 
and solutions being investigated. Through 
ongoing scenario analysis and the reinforcement 
of mitigation strategies, we are confident the 
resilience of our business and climate change 
adaptation efforts. Our proactive actions 
exemplify our strong commitment to action and 
innovation, firmly embedding sustainability into our 
operations and business and financial planning. 

–  While the climate scenario analysis was not 
updated in 2023, we reviewed the risks and 
opportunities as part of the Double Materiality 
Assessment (see pages 38-40) and using the 
enterprise risk management (ERM) tool that was 
implemented in 2022 to record and monitor risks.

–  We are collaborating with Ricardo to conduct a 

comprehensive update and review of the analysis 
during 2024, which will include an expansion 
of our consideration of cross-industry metrics 
and where possible, further quantifying the 
financial impact of the risks and opportunities. 
This process will involve incorporating the latest 
data, emerging trends, and evolving legislative 
and regulatory frameworks into our climate 
strategy thereby strengthening our resilience. 
This approach will seek to ensure that our 
climate scenario analysis remains accurate 
and aligns with the most recent scientific and 
industry developments. It is expected that future 
phases of work will require site visits to our 
operations in Ukraine, which are not possible at 
the current time. The Group will provide further 
updates on this work stream in due course. 

–  We acknowledge the importance of being 

transparent and accountable in our approach 
to climate transition and we have been 
following the development of the Transition 
Plan Taskforce (TPT) Disclosure Framework 
and believe this to be a valuable guide for 
consistent climate transition plans. As such, we 
aim to develop and communicate our strategic 
climate ambitions in alignment with the TPT 
and demonstrate how these are integrated 
into our operational strategies, governance 
mechanisms, and financial planning.

Risk management

Process for identifying and 
assessing climate-related risks.
–  The Board of Directors has ultimate 

responsibility for the identification of emerging 
and principal risks, including climate-
related risks, and associated strategies 
to manage and mitigate such risks. 

–  The Group has an internal risk register which 

considers emerging and principal risks related to 
the business, including climate-related risks, and 
determines their relative significance by reference 
to monetary impact, probability, maximum 
foreseeable loss, trend and mitigating actions. The 
risk register is updated monthly and discussed by 
executive management at the Group’s FRMCC 
Committee, where the completeness of the 
risk register is also considered and any new 
identifiable risks added. The risk register is also 
discussed and reviewed by the Audit Committee, 
at least quarterly per year. The FRMCC 
Committee ultimately reports into the Board for 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

further review and approval of the risk register.
–  As part of its consideration of climate-related 

risks, the FRMCC Committee also monitors how 
existing and proposed regulatory requirements 
such as the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment 
Mechanism (CBAM) may pose a risk to our 
business and may impact our future strategy. 

Managing climate-related Risks 
–  The Board monitors the Group’s risk 

management and internal control systems 
on an ongoing basis, supported by the 
Audit Committee, Executive Committee 
and HSEC Committee, as set out above.
–  Where a risk is deemed to be sufficiently 
significant in terms of potential impact or 
likelihood, appropriate risk mitigation measures 
are sought, including with the assistance 
of third party specialists where relevant. 
–  The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial 
Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief 
Marketing Officer have been delegated 
responsibility for managing specific risks within 
the business, including climate-related risks, on 
a day-to-day basis related to their functions. 

–  Further information on the actions taken 
to manage and mitigate risks relating 
to climate change is set out in the 
‘Principal Risks’ section on page 74. 

How processes for identifying, 
assessing, and managing climate-
related risks are integrated into the 
company’s overall risk management.
–  The Group’s processes for identifying, 

assessing, and managing climate-related risks 
are fully integrated into the Group’s overall 
risk governance framework, further details 
of which are set out above and in the ‘Risk 
Management’ section on pages 72 to 73.

Metrics and targets

Metrics used to assess climate-
related risks and opportunities 
–  The Group uses a wide range of climate-related 
metrics including GHG emissions (Scopes 1, 
2 and 3 and emissions intensity), as well as 
consumption of diesel, electricity and natural gas, 
water usage and waste generation and land use 
including biodiversity baseline mapping. Further 
information on these metrics is provided in the 
‘Responsible Business’ section on pages 36 to 37. 

–  Ferrexpo is also monitoring various key 

performance indicators (KPIs) to assess and 
manage climate-related risks and opportunities. 
These include steel carbon intensity, trends in 
carbon pricing, data on electric arc furnace steel 
production, recycling rates and volumes of scrap 
steel outputs, international shipping emissions, 
per tonne-kilometre efficiency, renewable energy 
availability and costs, green steel market trend, 
and related client preferences. These metrics 
and targets were selected based on their 
direct relevance to the Group’s operations and 
their ability to effectively track policy, market 
and technological changes. These KPIs have 
remained consistent since the last disclosure, 
however, Ferrexpo plans to re-evaluate these 
metrics during the 2024 TCFD refresh to ensure 
they continue to align with the Group’s goals 
and the expectations of stakeholders. By 
consistently tracking these indicators, we aim 
to ensure that our strategies and actions are 
aligned with climate-related targets and that 
we remain responsive to the evolving market 
demands and environmental imperatives.
–  Metrics relating to carbon reduction progress 

45

are incorporated into remuneration policies. Our 
remuneration policy includes consideration for 
sustainability-linked topics in the Short-Term 
Incentive Plan for executives, such as targets 
on an annual basis that are intended to help 
deliver our medium-term (2030) carbon reduction 
goals on Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, as 
well as elevating the production of higher grade 
direct reduction iron ore pellets, which are key 
to lowering the Group’s Scope 3 emissions.

–  Following a reduction in the risks associated with 
the war in Ukraine, the Group expects that new 
investments will be assessed using a price of 
carbon that is reflective of the prevailing carbon 
price within the EU Emissions Trading System, 
as was the case prior to the war in Ukraine. 

Greenhouse gas emission
–  The Group’s Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions in 

2023 and in 2022 (to allow for trend analysis), 
as well as the methodology used to calculate 
GHG emissions, are set out on page 36. 

–  The Group engaged MHA to conduct an 

independent limited assurance process in 
relation to the Group’s Scope 1 and Scope 
2 carbon emissions disclosures for 2022, 
which was completed in March 2023 and is 
available on our website at www.ferrexpo.com/
media/2bhnh3rv/independent-accountants-
limited-assurance-report-ferrexpo-plc-2022.pdf. 

Targets
–  Throughout 2021 and 2022, we developed our 

decarbonisation pathway, outlined in our Climate 
Change Report 2022, where we announced our 
carbon emissions reduction targets. Using a 
2019 baseline year, Ferrexpo aims to reduce its 
Scope 1 (direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect 
emissions from purchased electricity) emissions 
footprint by 50% by 2030 and Net Zero by 2050, 
though these targets may need to be adjusted 
due to the war. We introduced a new medium-
term target of reducing Scope 3 emissions by 
10% by 2030 and by 50% by 2050. Due to the war 

in Ukraine, we consider emissions per tonne, not 
absolute emissions, as the most representative 
performance measure. Our performance 
against these targets is set out on page 16.

–  We have mapped our progress in terms of climate 

governance maturity against the Transition 
Pathway Initiative (TPI) Centre’s “Management 
Quality Staircase”. Following the publication of our 
Climate Change Report and Scope 3 targets in 
December 2022, in addition to the independent 
assurance work completed in March 2023, we 
have assessed our progress to have reached 
Level 4 of reporting. The TPI Centre’s Staircase 
is particularly helpful for understanding the 
forward-looking component of our reporting 
journey that lies ahead and highlights a need 
for us to develop our understanding of the 
impact of climate change on our business 
costs as an area of focus for future work.

Material topics

(Note: 

 denotes key focus area for Ferrexpo.)

Risk matrix

External factor

Key focus area?

Market and technology shift

Increasing demand for low carbon emissions 
steelmaking

Movement towards circular economy principles

Mineral commodity shift: From iron ore to other 
minerals

Policy and legal

Shipping: Targets and regulations on carbon 
emissions

Carbon pricing/tax: Targets and regulations on 
carbon emissions

Energy crisis in Ukraine

Reporting: Targets and regulations on carbon 
emissions

Increase in insurance costs

Reputation

Increased consumer and investor climate 
consciousness

Climate action transparency: Increased demand 
from consumer and investors

Physical risks

Water stress (chronic)

Sea level rise (chronic)

Increase in storm intensity (acute)

Climate-induced conflict

Surface temperature rise

Opportunity for increased community and host 
country engagement over climate change related 
issues 

E
C
N
A
C
I
F
I
N
G
I
S

(Note: Bubble size denotes the scale of the potential impact on the Ferrexpo business.)

LIKELIHOOD

Code

Issue area

Matrix score

Top risk areas 
identified

CC

Climate-induced conflict

CEP

CP

Movement towards circular 
economy principles

Carbon pricing/tax: Targets and 
regulations on carbon emissions

CPU

Energy crisis in Ukraine

IIC

LCS

SCE

SI

SR

Increase in consumer and 
investor climate consciousness

Demand for low carbon emissions 
steelmaking

Shipping: Targets and regulations 
on carbon emissions

Increase in storm intensity (acute)

Sea level rise (chronic)

#3

#1

#2

Low

Low/Medium

Medium

Medium/High

High

1.  Source: CRU. Natural gas based direct reduction without carbon capture.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSLCSSICPUCCCEPSCESRCPIIC46

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

TCFD Disclosures

Introduction
In reviewing the possible risks and opportunities facing Ferrexpo as a result of climate change, a series of interviews were held with a range of 
our stakeholders. This process was established to determine perceptions around climate change and Ferrexpo’s business model. In turn, this 
information was subsequently mapped across three climate change scenarios, to produce the conclusions shown in this section. 

Through a mix of desk-based research and key stakeholder interviews, a number of shortlists have been developed of key potential risks and 
opportunities for Ferrexpo within the category areas, as shown in the summary table below.

Category

Market and 
technology

Description

Risks

Key risk areas: (1) demand for low emissions steel, and (2) movement towards circular economy 
principles. 

Through the scenario analysis conducted, the key risk themes across the scenarios that have been 
identified include a slight decrease in profit due to a decrease in global iron ore price, and increased 
demand for steel produced with a lower carbon emissions footprint (trending towards lower emissions 
and ultimately zero emissions “Green Steel”). IEA SDS predicts a reduced carbon emissions footprint of 
steel from 1.4tCO2/t steel in 2019 to 0.6tCO2/t steel in 2050. IEA STEPS predicts a reduction in carbon 
emissions footprint of steel from 1.4tCO2/t steel in 2019 to 1.1tCO2/t steel in 2050, with both scenarios 
predicting an increase in EAF’s share of global steel production to rise to c.50% by 2050.

Opportunities

Potential material opportunities: (1) demand for low emissions steel, and (2) movement towards circular 
economy principles. 

Through the scenario analysis conducted, the key opportunity themes across the scenarios include the 
strong position Ferrexpo currently holds with regards to the movement towards “Green Steel” (via direct 
reduction (“DR”) pellets and EAF steelmaking), with there being potential to increase pellet premiums 
and revenues.

Physical

Risks

Potential material opportunities: (1) Sea level rise (chronic), (2) Increase in storm intensity (acute), and (3) 
Climate induced conflict.

Through the scenario analysis conducted, the key risk themes across the scenarios include an increase 
in global sea level rise, an increase in global storm intensity and frequency, and a possibility for 
increased global conflict (more applicable for IEA STEPS and IPCC SSP4 scenarios). 

Opportunities

Not applicable – through the scenario analysis, only risks have been identified.

Policy and legal Risks

Key risk areas: (1) shipping targets and regulations on carbon emissions, (2) carbon pricing/tax targets 
and regulations on carbon emissions, and (3) a climate change related energy crisis in Ukraine. 

Through the scenario analysis, the key risk themes across the scenarios include the introduction of 
global carbon prices (set global prices for IEA STEPS and IEA SDS, and regional specific carbon prices 
for IPCC SSP4), a potential risk of insufficient energy access in Ukraine in IPCC SSP4, and a need for 
investment in decarbonising the shipping sector across all scenarios.

Opportunities

Potential material opportunities: (1) shipping: targets and regulations on carbon emissions, (2) carbon 
pricing/tax: targets and regulations on carbon emissions, and (3) a climate change related energy crisis 
in Ukraine. 

Through the scenario analysis conducted, the key opportunity themes across the scenarios includes a 
competitive advantage in the market should Ferrexpo successfully decarbonise its shipping operations, 
a financial advantage should Ferrexpo decrease their emissions to below the market average (secured if 
2050 net zero targets are achieved), and opportunity for Ferrexpo to diversify and become independent 
of Ukraine‘s national grid through the Group producing its own renewable energy.

Reputational

Risks

Key risk area: (1) increase in climate consciousness amongst customers, investors and other 
stakeholders. 

Through the scenario analysis, the key risk themes across the scenarios include an increase in positive 
sentiment towards green steel and/or iron ore from consumers and investors, resulting in potential for 
financial loss from not meeting customer and investor demands.

Opportunities

Potential material opportunity: (1) increase in climate consciousness amongst customers and investors. 

Through the scenario analysis, the key opportunity themes across the scenarios include an opportunity 
for Ferrexpo to upscale production of iron ore pellet types that are compatible with “Green Steel” to 
appeal to the market before other market competitors.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

47

Scenario analysis aims to look at the resilience of a business against different climate change scenarios, varying in the speed and severity of climate 
change over time, and the associated response by governments worldwide in terms of policy change.

As depicted in the figure opposite, climate change driven impacts on the operating environment may take the form of market and technology shifts, 
reputational factors, the impact of changes (or insufficient change) to government policy and legal frameworks, and physical impacts. 

Risks and opportunities may take the form of a transition risk, whereby companies do not respond quickly enough to a changing operating 
environment and/or shifting stakeholder expectations. Physical risks include the more obvious, direct impacts on a business, such as flooding and 
increasing storm events near a business’s operations, or more indirect impacts such as rising sea levels, and the impact that this could have on 
global trade routes and access to customers.

In evaluating the impact on a business, climate change risks and opportunities may affect a wide range of factors, such as a company’s operating 
costs, ability to generate revenues, supply chains, ability to operate continuously, and the timing of key company events and/or milestones. 

Businesses will need to have an answer to the key question:  
“What strategy is in place to transition business models to ones  
that remain valuable once ambitious climate policies are in place?”

APPLY CLIMATE SCENARIOS

Markets and  
technology shifts

Reputation

Transition  
risks and opportunities

Policy and 
legal

Physical climate 
change

Physical  
risks and opportunities

Evaluate business impacts:

•  Operating costs

•  Revenues

•  Supply chain

•  Business interruption

•  Timing

Source: Ricardo Plc.

APPLY CLIMATE SCENARIOS

CLIMATE RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES: SPECIFIC TO SECTOR, GEOGRAPHY AND TIME

Market and  
technology shifts

–  Reduced market 

– 

demand for emissions 
intensive products.
Increased demand 
for low carbon products 
and services.

Policy and legal

Reputation

Physical risks

–  Ambitious targets to 
decarbonise sectors, 
such as the energy and 
transport sectors.
Increased cost of 
production and taxes.

– 

–  Loss of trust and brand 
value if not risks and 
impacts are not 
addressed.

–  Opportunity to enhance 
reputation through 
responsible purpose.

–  Access to finance. 

–  Chronic changes to 
weather resulting in 
fundamental shifts.
–  More frequent acute 
weather events, 
such as fires, storms, 
and flooding.

–  Supply chain disruption.

–  Disruptive business 

–  Liability risks.

models.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS48

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

Climate 
scenario 
analysis

In undertaking our modelling exercise, 
climate scenarios were selected on the 
basis of giving a range of outcomes (rate 
of environmental change and severity of 
change) as a result of different levels of 
legislative ambition taken by governments 
in the coming years. Scenarios were also 
selected on the basis of being produced 
by a range of reputable independent 
authorities on climate change. 

1. International Energy Agency (“IEA”) 
Sustainable Development Scenario 
(“SDS”) 

Description: a “well below” 2°C scenario, 
achieved through policies that adhere to  
the Paris Agreement.

Summary:

This path sets out a plausible path to concurrently 
achieve universal access to energy, the objectives of 
the Paris Agreement, and a reduction in air pollution.

Characteristics:

Characteristics:

Characteristics:

–  A well below 2°C pathway.
–  Surge in clean energy policies and green investment.
–  All existing net zero pledges achieved in full.
–  Extensive efforts to realise near-term emissions 

reductions.

–  Number of western economies to reach net zero 

emissions by 2050, China by 2060, and a number 
of other countries by 2070 latest.

–  In alignment with the United Nations Sustainable 

Development Goals.

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Scenario metric

IEA SDS (Sustainable Development Scenario)

IEA STEPS (Stated Policies Scenario)

IPCC SSP4 (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 4)

Average global temperature increase (°C) by 2050

Average global temperature increase (°C) by 2100

1.7°C

1.6°C

Policy intervention

Time horizon

Transition risks  
(as a function of carbon price, with pricing correct as of 
studies completed in June 2022)

Transition risks  
(as a function of carbon intensity of steel production)

Orderly or disorderly transition

Potential overall impact on Ferrexpo (determined via stakeholder 
interviews and desktop studies, categorised on basis of 
occurrence and likelihood, see risk matrix on page 45 for more).

Low

Medium

High

Increased policy beyond what has already 
been committed to, from 2021

Only policies that are active in 2021, including what has 

Increased policy after 2030, demonstrating 

been committed to and what has been proposed

a rapid transition to decarbonisation

Present day to 2100

HIGH
(US$95/t) in 2050 
Global carbon price

HIGH
(0.6tCO2/t) by 2050

Orderly

“Well below” 2.0°C scenario (Paris Agreement aligned)

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

2. IEA Stated Policies Scenario (“STEPS”)

3. IPCC Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 4 

(“SSP4”)

Description: a worst case, “business as  

Description: a worst case, “business as  

usual scenario” (one of two modelled here).  

usual scenario” (one of two modelled here). 

A more conservative benchmark whereby 

governments are assumed to not reach all 

announced goals.

Summary:

Divided approach to climate change 

continues to widen through unequal 

investments in human capital.

Summary:

The STEPS scenario provides a more conservative 

Inequality (A Road Divided). Highly unequal investments 

benchmark for the future, because it does not take it for 

in human capital, combined with increasing disparities 

granted that governments will reach all announced goals. 

in economic opportunity and political power, lead to 

Instead, it takes a more granular, sector-by-sector look 

increasing inequalities and stratification both across 

at what has actually been put in place to reach these and 

and within countries.

other energy-related objectives, taking account not just of 

existing policies and measures, but also a look at those 

that are under development.

–  Sector-by-sector look at what has actually been put in 

–  A gap widens between an internationally connected 

place to reach goals and other energy-related objectives.

society that contributes to knowledge and capital 

–  Takes into account not just existing policies and 

measures but also those under development.

–  Includes “Fit for 55” measures announced by the 

European Commission in July 2021 (55% reduction in 

emissions by 2030 compared with 1990 baseline).

intensive sectors of the global economy, and a 

fragmented collection of lower income, poorly 

educated societies that work in a labour intensive, 

low-tech economy.

–  Social cohesion degrades, and conflict and unrest 

become increasingly common.

–  Technology development is high in the high-tech 

economy and sectors.

–  Globally connected energy sector diversifies, with 

investments in both intensive fuels like coal and 

unconventional oil, but also low carbon sources.

2.0°C

2.6°C

Present day to 2100

MEDIUM

(US$90/t) in 2050 

Global carbon price

MEDIUM

(1.1tCO2/t) by 2050

Potential for orderly or disorderly

Present day to 2100

MEDIUM

Regional carbon price in the short term, 

global carbon price in the long term

2.2°C

3.7°C

N/A

Disorderly

49

2. IEA Stated Policies Scenario (“STEPS”)

3. IPCC Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 4 
(“SSP4”)

Description: a worst case, “business as  
usual scenario” (one of two modelled here).  
A more conservative benchmark whereby 
governments are assumed to not reach all 
announced goals.

Description: a worst case, “business as  
usual scenario” (one of two modelled here). 
Divided approach to climate change 
continues to widen through unequal 
investments in human capital.

Summary:

Summary:

Summary:

The STEPS scenario provides a more conservative 
benchmark for the future, because it does not take it for 
granted that governments will reach all announced goals. 
Instead, it takes a more granular, sector-by-sector look 
at what has actually been put in place to reach these and 
other energy-related objectives, taking account not just of 
existing policies and measures, but also a look at those 
that are under development.

Inequality (A Road Divided). Highly unequal investments 
in human capital, combined with increasing disparities 
in economic opportunity and political power, lead to 
increasing inequalities and stratification both across 
and within countries.

Characteristics:

Characteristics:

–  Sector-by-sector look at what has actually been put in 

place to reach goals and other energy-related objectives.

–  Takes into account not just existing policies and 
measures but also those under development.
–  Includes “Fit for 55” measures announced by the 

European Commission in July 2021 (55% reduction in 
emissions by 2030 compared with 1990 baseline).

–  A gap widens between an internationally connected 
society that contributes to knowledge and capital 
intensive sectors of the global economy, and a 
fragmented collection of lower income, poorly 
educated societies that work in a labour intensive, 
low-tech economy.

–  Social cohesion degrades, and conflict and unrest 

become increasingly common.

–  Technology development is high in the high-tech 

economy and sectors.

–  Globally connected energy sector diversifies, with 
investments in both intensive fuels like coal and 
unconventional oil, but also low carbon sources.

1. International Energy Agency (“IEA”) 

Sustainable Development Scenario 

(“SDS”) 

Description: a “well below” 2°C scenario, 

achieved through policies that adhere to  

the Paris Agreement.

This path sets out a plausible path to concurrently 

achieve universal access to energy, the objectives of 

the Paris Agreement, and a reduction in air pollution.

Characteristics:

–  A well below 2°C pathway.

–  Surge in clean energy policies and green investment.

–  All existing net zero pledges achieved in full.

–  Extensive efforts to realise near-term emissions 

reductions.

–  Number of western economies to reach net zero 

emissions by 2050, China by 2060, and a number 

of other countries by 2070 latest.

–  In alignment with the United Nations Sustainable 

Development Goals.

Scenario metric

Average global temperature increase (°C) by 2050

Average global temperature increase (°C) by 2100

Policy intervention

Time horizon

Transition risks  

(as a function of carbon price, with pricing correct as of 

studies completed in June 2022)

Transition risks  

(as a function of carbon intensity of steel production)

Orderly or disorderly transition

1.7°C

1.6°C

Present day to 2100

HIGH

(US$95/t) in 2050 

Global carbon price

(0.6tCO2/t) by 2050

HIGH

Orderly

IEA SDS (Sustainable Development Scenario)

IEA STEPS (Stated Policies Scenario)

IPCC SSP4 (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 4)

Increased policy beyond what has already 

been committed to, from 2021

Only policies that are active in 2021, including what has 
been committed to and what has been proposed

Increased policy after 2030, demonstrating 
a rapid transition to decarbonisation

2.0°C

2.6°C

2.2°C

3.7°C

Present day to 2100

MEDIUM
(US$90/t) in 2050 
Global carbon price

MEDIUM
(1.1tCO2/t) by 2050

Potential for orderly or disorderly

Present day to 2100

MEDIUM
Regional carbon price in the short term, 
global carbon price in the long term

N/A

Disorderly

Worst case, “business as usual” scenarios

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS50

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

Materiality assessment

Key topic: 

Key topic: 

Low carbon emissions steelmaking.

Shipping targets and regulations on 
carbon emissions.

Key topic: 

Carbon pricing and taxes. 

Summary: 
Increasing regulations on the shipping 
industry as carbon emissions targets 
are introduced, with measures 
similar to the EU’s Carbon Border 
Adjustment Mechanism (“CBAM”), 
will likely increase costs.

Given the current regulatory landscape, 
this factor is unlikely to impact the Group 
in the short term (0 to 5 years), but over 
the medium to long term will likely pose 
a risk, as it will increase the Group’s cost 
base as technology to aid decarbonisation 
is implemented. However, this topic may 
present an opportunity to the Group if 
Ferrexpo is successful in decarbonising 
its shipping operations, potentially 
providing a competitive advantage.

This topic is assessed to be a medium 
to high risk across all three climate 
change scenarios for 2050 to 2100.

Summary: 
Mandatory pricing and taxes of carbon 
emissions, increasing the operating costs 
for those consuming fossil fuels and/
or generating industrial emissions. 

In the medium to long term, carbon 
pricing will negatively impact profitability 
through increasing operating costs. This 
risk will be exacerbated if the Group fails 
to adequately reduce emissions over 
time. If the Group does, however, reduce 
its emissions, then this will present the 
Group with an opportunity as it will have a 
competitive advantage over its peer group. 
Significant opportunity lies in achieving 
net zero targets, ahead of others. 

This topic is assessed to be a medium 
to high risk across all three climate 
change scenarios for 2050 to 2100.

Summary: 
Increasing market demand for low carbon 
emissions steelmaking, which in turn 
will affect demand for the various raw 
materials required for the production 
of steel. In the short term, this shift 
presents an opportunity to Ferrexpo 
as the drive towards Green Steel will 
increase demand for direct reduction 
(“DR”) pellets, which are a form of iron 
ore that can be used in direct reduced 
iron-electric arc furnace (“DRI-EAF”) 
steelmaking. Through this opportunity, 
Ferrexpo can increase the premium paid 
for its products by customers, potentially 
increasing revenues as a result. 

In the long term (2050 to 2100), the 
movement towards green steel presents 
a risk to the Group as other market 
competitors will begin to supply green 
steel producers, resulting in an increase 
in competitor products, such as DR 
pellets for use in DRI-EAF steelmaking. 
In this scenario, Ferrexpo would lose 
its competitive advantage to be a 
market leader that it currently has.

This topic is assessed to be a medium 
to high risk across all three climate 
change scenarios for 2050-2100.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
51

Scenario analysis: in detail

DEMAND FOR LOW CARBON EMISSIONS STEELMAKING | 

 MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY SHIFTS

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

The carbon intensity of steel:

Financial impacts

To meet national, international and 
industrial climate targets, the general 
market is required to shift towards lower 
carbon emissions steelmaking. 

Opportunity for Ferrexpo:  
short term

Ferrexpo is in a strong position to support 
this shift through producing more green 
steel, increasing the premium and revenue 
as a result. 

?   Risk to Ferrexpo: long term
Other competitors in the market may start 
to produce green steel too, including direct 
reduction (“DR”) pellets for use in electric 
arc furnaces. Potential for Ferrexpo no 
longer to be seen as “market leaders”  
in the transition. 

– 

– 

IEA SDS: assumes a decrease in steel 
carbon intensity from 1.4tCO2/t in 2019 
to 0.6 tCO2/t by 2050.
IEA STEPS: assumes a decrease in steel 
carbon intensity from 1.4tCO2/t in 2019 
to 1.1 tCO2/t by 2050.

Electric arc furnace (EAF) uptake:

– 

– 

IEA SDS: assumes an increase in EAF 
share of steel production from 29% in 
2019 to 57.5% by 2050.
IEA STEPS: assumes an increase in EAF 
share of steel production from 29% in 
2019 to 47.4% by 2050.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing







–  Any correlation between changes in 

revenue/market price and any change 
in global steel carbon intensity due to 
carbon policy impacts.

Performance against competitors

–  The carbon intensity of Ferrexpo 

products compared to competitors.

Geographical spread of 
market changes

–  Any change in global steel production 

methods due to technology 
development and consumer preference.
–  Any trends in these KPIs geographically, 
compared to the location of Ferrexpo 
market base.

04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Establish manufacturing capability for technology and equipment required to 
integrate into market shift to green steel. The sooner Ferrexpo can integrate 
technologies that aid the reduction of carbon emissions, such as use of green 
hydrogen in the pelletising process, the further Ferrexpo will be ahead of other 
market competitors. 

Short–medium 
term

Monitor Ferrexpo product carbon emissions intensity compared to other 
market competitors to ensure Ferrexpo can stay ahead as market leaders in 
this transition, ensuring increased premium and revenue.

Medium–long 
term

Incorporate continuous monitoring of global steel carbon emissions intensity 
requirements and incorporate into the Ferrexpo business strategy. Decisions 
on diversification and development of low energy intensive steel can thereby 
be influenced.

Continuous

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
  
52

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

MOVEMENT TOWARDS CIRCULAR ECONOMY PRINCIPLES | 

 MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY SHIFT

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

Global movement towards circular 
economy principles, driving an increase in 
scrap steel recycling and repurposing rates.  

?   

Risk to Ferrexpo: 
medium–long term

Reduced demand for virgin iron ore, 
resulting in a decrease in Ferrexpo sales 
and growth.

The repurposing rates, recycling rates 
and volume of scrap steel output:

– 

– 

IEA SDS: assumes an increase in metallic 
scrap input from 32.1% in 2019 to 45.3% 
by 2050.
IEA STEPS: assumes an increase in 
metallic scrap input from 32.1% in 2019 to 
44.7% by 2050.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing







Financial impacts

–  Any correlation between changes in 

revenue/market price and global scrap 
steel recycling rates.

Geographical spread of market/
technology changes

– 

– 

– 

Identify potential methods / 
technologies / equipment which can 
be utilised to repurpose / recycle 
scrap steel.
Identify main countries where circular 
economy shift is increasing, and 
companies that are adopting the scrap 
steel recycling method.
Identify markets for repurposed and 
recycled steel to establish client base 
for products.

04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Map out the existing and potential client base to develop an understanding of 
key markets and clients. 

Short–medium 
term

Incorporate into Ferrexpo business strategy: continuous monitoring of 
global scrap steel recycling rates, including identification of main countries 
where a shift to a circular economy is increasing. Decisions on investment, 
diversification, and development of new products can therefore be influenced.

Continuous

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
53

SHIPPING: TARGETS AND REGULATIONS ON CARBON EMISSIONS | 

 POLICY AND LEGAL

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

Carbon emission targets and regulation 
on the shipping sector are introduced. 
This may include the EU’s Carbon Border 
Adjustment Mechanism (“CBAM”), making 
more energy intensive shipping methods 
more expensive. 

Opportunity for Ferrexpo:  
medium-long term

If Ferrexpo is successful at decarbonising 
its shipping operations, it may provide a 
competitive advantage, should regulations 
and additional CBAM legislation be 
introduced. 

?   

Risk to Ferrexpo:  
medium-long term

Increased costs on Ferrexpo from shipping 
decarbonisation technology requirements.

The intensity of shipping sector targets 
introduced:

– 

– 

IEA SDS: assumes international shipping 
emission trajectory consistent with a 50% 
reduction by 2050 from a 2008 baseline. 
Ban of trucks with internal combustion 
engines by 2035.

IEA STEPS: 30% improvement in energy 
efficiency per tonne-kilometre in new ships 
and policies to aid the decarbonisation of 
shipping.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing









Financial impacts

–  Any revenue and/or market price 
changes influenced by the need 
for investment in decarbonisation 
technologies to achieve any shipping 
targets implemented.

Performance against competitors

–  The cost of CBAM for Ferrexpo, 

compared to competitors. There could 
also be positive reputational impacts if 
Ferrexpo is seen as a market leader in 
the area and vice versa.

Distribution of policy changes

–  The financial impact on Ferrexpo is 

dependent on the nature of shipping 
policy implemented. If financial policies 
to support any technology transition 
are available, the impact on industry 
is reduced.

04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Assess technologies that are available to decarbonise Ferrexpo shipping 
operations, and if these are plausible solutions that could support Ferrexpo 
in aligning with potential future shipping regulations and targets. 

Short–medium 
term

Invest in the technology required to meet any shipping targets and regulations. 
This is dependent on the scale and boundary of policies introduced, when and 
where they are introduced, and the technology that is available at the time. 

Medium–long 
term

Monitor the targets and regulations that are introduced to the shipping sector 
in different regions whereby Ferrexpo operates. Assess the quantitative 
financial risks of these scenarios and incorporate this risk into all business 
plans and decision-making.

Continuous

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
  
 
54

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

CARBON PRICING/TAX: TARGETS AND REGULATIONS ON CARBON EMISSIONS | 

 POLICY AND LEGAL

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

A mandatory (increasing) global carbon 
price for fossil fuel and industrial emissions. 

Opportunity for Ferrexpo:  
short–medium term

Financial advantage compared to market 
competitors if emissions are reduced to 
levels below the market average. If 2050 
net zero target is achieved, then this may 
present and opportunity for Ferrexpo. 

Risk to Ferrexpo:  
medium–long term

?   
Decrease in profits due to increase in 
carbon tax, if Ferrexpo does not sufficiently 
reduce it’s carbon emissions. 

Global mandatory carbon price  
(USD/tCO2):
– 

IEA SDS: assumes 35 by 2040, 95 by 
20501.
IEA STEPS: assumes 65 by 2030, 75 by 
2040, 90 by 20501.
IPCC SSP4: assumes regional carbon 
price in the short term, global carbon price 
in the long term.

– 

– 

Increases beyond this expected to 2100. 
IEA scenario carbon price assumes that 
Ferrexpo operates in emerging and 
developing economies. Carbon price for 
operating in advanced economies is larger.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing









Financial impacts

–  Any correlation between changes in 

revenue/market price and any change 
in mandatory carbon price.

Performance against competitors

–  Progress in emission reductions 
achieved compared to targets.
–  Ferrexpo emissions and carbon tax 

compared to competitors.

Distribution of policy changes

–  Any difference in carbon price 

geographically and the relevance 
to Ferrexpo operations.

–  Any difference in carbon price, 
boundary and scope based on  
markets/industries and the relevance 
to Ferrexpo operations.

04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Understand the capacity for technology, equipment and offsetting required 
to transition Ferrexpo to a net zero business by 2050.

Short–medium 
term

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Monitor Ferrexpo product carbon intensity and carbon footprint compared 
to other market competitors to ensure Ferrexpo can stay ahead of market 
leaders, ensuring increased revenue in comparison. Carbon tax boundaries 
and scope should be monitored as this will determine if Ferrexpo products 
can support the market in reducing the carbon tax burden.

Incorporate net zero roadmap and continuous monitoring of global carbon 
prices into Ferrexpo business strategy. Decisions on diversification and 
development of carbon reduction technology/processes can thereby be 
directly influenced. Emission reduction performance against targets should 
be regularly monitored to asses exposure and vulnerability to risk.

Medium–long 
term

Continuous

1. 

 Carbon pricing correct as of timing of studies completed (June 2022).

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

  
55

ENERGY CRISIS IN UKRAINE | 

 POLICY AND LEGAL

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

Climate change related natural, 
economic or political events, which 
could leave Ukraine’s energy system 
vulnerable to crises.  

Opportunity for Ferrexpo: 
continuous

Ferrexpo’s mining operations are located 
in Ukraine and are highly energy intensive, 
with Ferrexpo very sensitive to changes 
in energy provision. 

Risk to Ferrexpo:  
short–medium term

?   
Opportunity for Ferrexpo to diversify and 
become independent of the Ukraine energy 
grid through producing their own renewable 
energy.

Energy policy: access and renewable 
make-up:

– 

– 

– 

IEA SDS: assumes fair access to clean 
energy for all, globally, meaning impact 
of risk is minimal.
IEA STEPS: assumes not all governments 
will reach announced goals*.
IPCC SSP4: assumes uncertainty in the 
fossil fuel market*.

*  Ukraine’s climate and energy policy has been rated 
as highly insufficient by the Climate Action Tracker, 
suggesting a vulnerability of Ferrexpo to this risk.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing









Financial impacts

– 

Increased energy costs due to instability 
in Ukraine’s energy market and the 
impact of this on revenue.

Performance against competitors

–  Monitoring of competitor risk to similar 

constraints.

–  Access to clean and sufficient energy in 
Ukraine, compared to other countries.

Composition of Ukraine energy

–  Renewable composition of the grid, 

compared to Ferrexpo renewable and 
emission targets.

–  The cost/benefits of private renewable 
generation compared to grid supply.

04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Assess the cost/benefit of investing in a private renewable energy supply, 
independent of the Ukrainian grid. 

Short–medium 
term

Monitor the political instability of Ukraine, mitigation options/influence to 
overcome this, and integrate the impacts of this risk on Ferrexpo operations 
and reputation into business decisions and long-term plans.

Continuous

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
56

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

CONSUMER AND INVESTOR CONSCIOUSNESS | 

 REPUTATION

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

An increase in positive sentiment towards 
Green Steel (and associated sources of iron 
ore) from both consumers and investors. 
Assumes an associated increase in 
demand for climate action transparency. 

Opportunity for Ferrexpo:  
short-medium term

Ferrexpo are moving towards the scaled 
production of iron ore for the Green Steel 
market. There is an opportunity to upscale 
this production and become a key player in 
the market. 

Risk to Ferrexpo:  
medium–long term

?   
Risk of reputational loss if net zero targets 
are not met, and/or competitors perform 
better in the sector than Ferrexpo, 
potentially leading to financial losses.

Consumer and investor demand for 
climate action:

– 

– 

– 

IEA SDS: Not specified. This scenario 
models a world that achieves sustainable 
development, and in such a scenario, 
Ferrexpo would have to outperform current 
targets to compete with its competitors. 
This is more likely a risk than an opportunity.
IEA STEPS: Not specified. Assumes 
extensive change but not all government 
and industry targets are met, suggesting 
Ferrexpo has an opportunity to become a 
market leader.
IPCC SSP4: Not specified. In a disorderly 
transition, it is likely this is more an 
opportunity than a risk to Ferrexpo.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing







Financial impacts

–  Any changes in revenue/market price, 
correlated to Ferrexpo’s reputation on 
climate action and sustainability.

–  Understanding consumer and investor 

opinions on Ferrexpo and climate action 
would be beneficial for this risk/
opportunity.

Performance against competitors

–  Benchmarking sustainability 

performance, communication and 
reputation against competitors.

04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Benchmarking exercise of Ferrexpo sustainability and climate action 
achievements, and communication and reputation performance against 
competitors. A particularly beneficial aspect of this will be understanding 
both consumer and investor opinions of Ferrexpo, including in its recent 
roadmap to net zero.

Short–medium 
term

Consideration should be given to the communication of any climate and 
sustainability action. As we move closer towards carbon budgets and net zero 
targets, focus will be on those who can not only achieve sustainability, but 
demonstrate and communicate it effectively. Consumers and investors are 
likely to become more scrutinous of greenwashing. 

Medium–long 
term

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Climate and sustainability action should be taken, taking into account the 
benchmarking previously completed. Foresight will be needed to stay ahead 
of competitors. 

Continuous

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

  
57

CLIMATE-INDUCED CONFLICT | 

 PHYSICAL RISKS

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

Climate change related natural, economic 
or political events create political instability 
and/or conflict that impacts on Ferrexpo 
operations and trade. 

?  Risk to Ferrexpo: continuous
In a world of climate induced political 
instability, there is an increased potential 
that Ferrexpo operations, employees or 
supply chain will be negatively impacted, 
potentially leading to deceased profits, 
sales, funding and reputation.

The frequency of climate-induced 
political instability:

– 

– 

– 

IEA SDS: assumes sustainable 
development is achieved, reducing the 
likelihood of climate-induced conflict.
IEA STEPS: assume sustainable 
development is not achieved, and covers 
the possibility of policies, commitments 
and targets not being reached. Climate-
induced conflict is therefore plausible in 
this scenario.
IPCC SSP4: physical impacts most 
extreme in a 3.7°C scenario, and transition 
is more disorderly, therefore climate-
induced conflict is likely.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing









Revenue changes

–  Any correlation between climate-
induced conflict or instability and 
revenue.

Performance against competitors

–  Benchmarking against competitors on 
climate conflict mitigation, and support 
provided for employees impacted. 
Potential reputational impacts from this.

Distribution of instability

–  The impact of this risk is heavily 

– 

determined by the location of any 
climate-induced political instability 
compared to Ferrexpo operations.
Indirect impacts may encompass 
Ferrexpo trade routes (e.g. shipping 
of products) and so these should be 
closely monitored.

04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Assess climate-induced conflict and political instability by likelihood, Ferrexpo 
operating and trading locations and Ferrexpo business plan timeframes.

Short–medium 
term

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Incorporate the risks identified in the short–medium term into decision 
making. The likelihood of climate-induced political instability and/or conflict 
is increased by the physical impacts of climate change, the climate change 
policy implemented and where these both occur. This risk is difficult to 
distinguish from non climate-induced instabilities but should still be 
recognised where possible.

Continuous

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS58

Responsible Business: TCFD Disclosures continued

SEA LEVEL RISE (CHRONIC) | 

 PHYSICAL RISKS

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

Global sea level rise increase, leading to 
direct or indirect impacts on Ferrexpo 
operations, employees or supply chain. 

?  Risk to Ferrexpo: continuous
Disruption to ports and navigation routes, 
particularly from the port of Pivdennyi in 
Southern Ukraine and in receiving ports. 
Disruption also to employees and the 
Ferrexpo general supply chain.

Sea level rise along distribution routes 
and ports:

– 

– 

IEA SDS: Not specified. Under a 1.5°C 
scenario, the IPCC SSP2 suggests an 
average global sea level rise of 0.2m by 
2050 and 0.4m by 2100, exposing 
128–139 million people.
IEA STEPS and IPCC SSP4: Not 
specified. Under a >2°C scenario, sea 
level rise is modelled between 0.32–0.63m 
by 2100*.

*  Comparable scenario: IPCC’s Relative Concentration 

Pathway (“RC”) 4.6-6.

Financial impact

–  Any revenue/market price changes 

correlated to an increase in sea level 
rise. This could be indirect e.g. port/
distribution disruption from sea level 
rise.
Impacts of sea level rise on assets, 
and insurance for assets.

– 

Employees and reputation

–  There is also a reputation risk here, 

dependent on how Ferrexpo responds 
to employees, operational facilities and 
supply chains facing disruption due to 
sea level rise.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing









04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Assess the quantitative risk of sea level rise to Ferrexpo’s supply chain and 
shipping operations, including the most vulnerable shipping routes, ports, 
customers and employees. Incorporate this risk into decision making.

Short–medium 
term

Research mitigation and adaptation options for those areas of Ferrexpo 
operations, supply chain and workforce identified as at risk from sea level rise. 
If those identified are outside of Ferrexpo’s direct operations, consider 
engaging with those third parties to increase resilience to sea level rise. 

Medium–long 
term

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

59

INCREASE IN STORM FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY (ACUTE) | 

 PHYSICAL RISKS

01. DESCRIPTION

02. SUGGESTED KPIS TO MONITOR THE RISK

03. DATA REQUIRED TO ANALYSE IMPACTS

Outline

Increase in storm frequency and intensity, 
leading to direct or indirect impacts on 
Ferrexpo’s operations, employees or 
supply chains. 

?  Risk to Ferrexpo: continuous
Disruption to ports and navigation routes, 
and in receiving ports. Disruption also to 
employees and Ferrexpo’s general supply 
chain.

Sea level rise along distribution routes 
and ports:

– 

– 

– 

IEA SDS: Not specified. Under a 1.5°C 
scenario, storm intensity and frequency 
are likely to increase.
IEA STEPS: Not specified. Under a >2°C 
scenario, storm intensity and frequency 
are likely to increase. The magnitude of 
this impact is likely to be larger than the 
IEA’s SDS scenario.
IPCC SSP4: Not specified. Under a >2°C 
scenario, storm intensity and frequency 
are likely to increase. The magnitude of 
this impact is likely to be larger than the 
IEA’s SDS scenario.

Financial impact

–  Any revenue/market price changes 
correlated to an increase in storm 
frequency and intensity. This could 
be direct (e.g. damage to Ferrexpo 
infrastructure, product and employees), 
or indirect (e.g. port/distribution 
disruption and widescale economic 
impacts).

Employees and reputation

–  There is also a reputational risk here, 

dependent on how Ferrexpo responds 
to employees and facilities facing storm 
disruption.

POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE FOLLOWING AREAS

Revenues

Expenditures

Assets and 
liabilities

Capital and 
financing









04.  SCENARIO RISK/ 

OPPORTUNITY RATING

05. POTENTIAL STRATEGIC ACTIONS TO MANAGE RISK AND TIMEFRAME

Source: Ricardo Plc.

Date

2050

2100

Assess the quantitative risk of an increase in storm frequency and intensity 
to Ferrexpo’s supply chain and shipping operations, including the most 
vulnerable shipping routes, ports, customers and employees. Incorporate 
this risk into decision making.

Short–medium 
term

Research mitigation and adaptation options for those areas of Ferrexpo’s 
operations, supply chain and workforce that have been identified as being at 
risk from an increase in storm frequency and intensity. If those identified are 
outside of Ferrexpo’s directly-owned operations, Ferrexpo should consider 
engaging with those third parties to increase resilience to these storms.

Medium–long 
term

IEA SDS

IEA STEPS

IPCC SSP4

Overall impact  
on the business:

Low

Medium

High

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS60

Responsible Business: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

Ferrexpo places great 
importance on creating a 
workplace culture in which 
all contributions are valued, 
different perspectives are 
embraced, and biases are 
acknowledged and mitigated.

Greg Nortje,
Chief Human Resources Officer

Ferrexpo places great importance on creating 
a workplace culture in which all contributions 
are valued, different perspectives are 
embraced, and biases are acknowledged 
and mitigated. This commitment is set out in 
the Company’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion 
(“DEI”) Policy which was adopted by the Board 
in 2019. This policy is designed to prohibit all 
forms of unfair discrimination (on the basis of 
disability, pregnancy and parenthood, race, 
national or ethnic origin, age, gender, sexual 
orientation, political opinion, and social origin).

In support of the Policy, the Company’s 
diversity initiatives are focused on helping 
us to develop a diverse workforce that 
embraces difference and an inclusive 
working environment where all employees 
regardless of their background, marital 
status, age, ethnicity, sexual orientation 
or gender can realise their full potential.

DEI progress in 2023
Our DEI efforts have increased significantly 
in recent years, with increased stakeholder 
focus and a greater emphasis on companies 
having a sustainable, inclusive culture. Our 
DEI efforts continued in 2023, but some 
planned internal events could not be held 
due to disruption arising from the war in 
Ukraine and were held over to 2024. 

Activities that were progressed included 
an inaugural ‘school for clerks’, involving 
32 employees with disabilities, with the 
aim of equipping these employees with 

appropriate practical life skills to support 
their inclusion and equal participation 
in the ‘normal’ life of the company.

Fe_munity Teens programme was also 
offered online to 54 teenagers drawn from 
the local community surrounding the Group’s 
operations. This new programme is part of 
Ferrexpo’s Corporate Social Responsibility 
work within the local communities surrounding 
our operations and is built around the themes 
of self-discovery, self-directed learning and 
personal growth. The programme, in keeping 
with the broader Fe_munity programme, aims 
to accelerate the development of participants as 
they navigate the challenges and gender biases 
that might hinder their personal progression 
at secondary or at tertiary education level 
or generally within broader society. It is 
particularly noteworthy that this programme 
was conceptualised and run by the alumni of 
the previous three Fe_munity programmes.

In 2023, DEI sensitivity and unconscious bias 
training was also provided to students who 
are attending the local technical college as 
well as students that are enrolled in a special 
maths and science class in one of the schools 
in Horishni Plavni, that is sponsored annually 
by Ferrexpo. The proportion of managerial 
roles held by women rose from 20.9% in 2022 
(81 female managers) to 22.3% in 2023 (87 
female managers), with this upward trend 
expected to continue into 2024, despite the 
war in Ukraine. This trend means that the 
Group is tracking well to achieve its stated 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

30.9%

Positions held by women accounted 
for 30.9% of our total employee 
workforce in 2023 (2022: 28.7%)1.

22.3%

Women in management roles 
across the Group increased to 
22.3% in 2023 (2022: 20.9%)2.

25%

Target of 25% of management 
positions to be held by women by 
2030. Progress to date has seen an 
increase from 18% in 2019 to 22.3% 
in 2023.

1.  Of the total employee workforce in 2023 (6,889) (2022: 
7,983), 2,130 positions were held by women and 4,759 
held by men.

2.  Of the total number of management roles in 2023 (391), 87 
positions were held by women and 304 were held by men.

61

WE ARE DETERMINED

Victoria Shcherbak and Tamara Shvets

Victoria and Tamara work as 
administrators at Ferrexpo’s  
Kyiv office, where they contribute 
to creating a comfortable and 
positive work environment for  
their colleagues.

How has the war changed your 
approach to work?
We have learnt to adapt and sometimes 
learn on the fly. We cannot halt life and 
stop planning due to the war. What’s our 
plan b, our plan c? Imagine driving a car 
and the satellite navigation charts a route, 
but suddenly the road is blocked. The tech 
doesn’t complain, it provides an immediate 
alternative route. The ability to navigate  
in uncharted territories has become a  
new skill.

What has the war taught you about 
how you perform your job?
Two things: make it a priority to replenish 
your mental and emotional reserves, and 
always have backup external batteries! 
Simple and disciplined self-care methods 
are mandatory, this includes getting 
sufficient sleep, outdoor walks, cultivating 
positive emotions, and incorporating 
humour into everyday life. Tackling 
significant challenges becomes more 
manageable by breaking them down 
into simple and comprehensible steps.

When the war is over, what will be 
different for you in your job function?
After the war concludes our focus will shift 
from crisis response to building out strategic 
initiatives. The end of the war marks a 
transition from reactive roles to proactive 
engagement. And we will be armed with the 
resilience that we have developed during 
war time. Resilience is a choice to live, a 
choice that embodies the enduring hope 
that will guide us through reconstruction.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

target of at least 25% of managerial roles 
to be held by women by 2030. The overall 
number of women in the workforce also 
improved in 2023 to 30.9% (2022: 28.7%).

Our Inclusion School, which is a training 
programme for our employees in Ukraine, 
began in 2021, and restarted in late 2022 
flowing into the early part of 2023. Topics 
covered in this programme are aimed at 
fostering inclusiveness and diversity, and 
how this can help Ferrexpo’s business model. 
More than 200 of Ferrexpo’s employees 
completed this course by the end of 1Q 
2023. Online learning covers topics such as 
identifying different forms of discrimination, 
why it is important to eliminate prejudice 
and how tolerance can help Ukraine 
to tackle its wartime challenges. Our 
Inclusion School was also extended at the 
beginning of 2023 to include local authority 
employees who are keen to learn more about 
challenging prejudice and discrimination.

The activities in 2023 helped to generate 
a positive working environment that 
supports people’s mental health 
and wellbeing, regardless of age, 
gender or other characteristics.

Additionally, the Group’s 2022 Responsible 
Business Report is available on our website 
at https://www.ferrexpo.com/responsibility/
responsible-business-reports/

Gender diversity targets for 2030
At Ferrexpo, we have a gender diversity 
target of ensuring 25% of managerial roles 
are filled by women by 2030. To date, our 
diversity efforts have enabled us to progress 
the level of women in management roles 
from 18% in 2019 to 22.3% in 2023, which 
has been possible through a range of 
diversity initiatives in Ukraine and across 
the Group, as well as sustainability-linked 
incentives within the Group’s Remuneration 
Policy (see page 143 for more details).

We are specifically targeting diversity at the 
managerial level, rather than total diversity, as 
this helps to encourage career progression 
and opportunities for women, which may 
not otherwise be available. Our workforce 
does, however, include a higher proportion of 
women (2023: 30.9%) than our mining-sector 
peers that operate in the developing world1.

External recognition in 2023
Our DEI efforts are not going unnoticed, with 
external recognition of the forward thinking 
that Ferrexpo is introducing to its business.

In 2023, the Group’s multi-component 
Fe_munity programme, covering corporate, 
all Ukraine and teenagers, won first prize 
at the all Ukrainian HR PRO Awards in 
the Diversity and Inclusion category.

1.  Comprising mining companies in the FTSE 350 Index 
where the main focus of mining is outside of Australia 
and Canada.

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS62

Responsible Business: Governance

Governance: 
Building trust

With good corporate governance, companies are able 
to build trust with their stakeholders. Through trust, 
companies can enjoy the benefits of a strong brand 
that stakeholders can associate with.

Board composition
Effective corporate governance starts with the 
Board of Directors (“Board”). As of the date of 
this document, Ferrexpo’s Board comprises 
six Directors – including two Executive 
Directors and four Independent Non-
executive Directors. For more details of the 
Board composition and activities during the 
year, please see the Corporate Governance 
section of this report (page 93). 

Board changes and 
position appointments
During the year, in February 2023, Natalie 
Polischuk was appointed a member of the 
Committee of Independent Directors.

Following the Annual General Meeting, in 
May 2023, Jim North resigned as an Executive 
Director and Nikolay Kladiev was appointed as 
an Executive Director. Ann-Christin Andersen 
resigned as an independent Non-executive 
Director and Natalie Polischuk was appointed 
as Chair of the Group HSEC’s Committee. 

At the end of June 2023, Jim North resigned 
as Chief Executive Officer. Following his 
resignation as Chief Executive Officer, the 
decision was taken to combine the roles 
of the Chair and Chief Executive Officer on 
an interim basis as with the ongoing war in 
Ukraine and the need for business continuity 
it was not considered the right time to 
commence an external search process for a 
new Chief Executive Officer. To this end, in 
July 2023, Lucio Genovese was appointed 
to act as Executive Chair on an interim basis 
and assume leadership of the Group. 

In October 2023, Stuart Brown was appointed 
as an independent Non-executive Director and 
a member of the Audit Committee. Following 
an orderly handover process, Graeme 
Dacomb resigned at the end of December 
2023 as an independent Non-executive 

Director and Chair of the Audit Committee. In 
January 2024, Stuart Brown was appointed 
as Chair of the Audit Committee and a 
member of the Remuneration Committee. 
Most recently in February 2024, Stuart 
Brown was appointed a member of the 
Committee of Independent Directors. 

FTSE Women Leaders Review
The FTSE Women Leaders Review is an 
independent, business-led framework 
supported by the Government, which sets 
recommendations for Britain’s largest 
companies to improve the representation 
of Women on Boards and in Leadership 
positions. As a result of this work, the FTSE 
Women Leaders Review recommends 
that companies listed within the FTSE 350 
have at least 40% female representation 
at Board level by the end of 2025, as 
well as at least one woman appointed as 
chair, senior independent director (“SID”), 
CEO or CFO by the end of 2025. 

As of the date of this report, Ferrexpo’s 
Board is 33% female (31 December 2022: 
43%), meaning that although Ferrexpo 
met the requirement for a female in one of 
the stated roles, with Fiona MacAulay as 
the Group’s SID, due to Board changes 
the recommendation for Board gender 
diversity set by the FTSE Women Leaders 
Review was unfortunately not met. 

The Group is also focusing on increasing 
diversity further down its organisational 
structure; details of this work can be found 
on pages 60 to 61, and in the Corporate 
Governance Report on page 93.

20%

Female representation on the 
Group’s Executive Committee 
(one out of five members).

33%

Female representation on the 
Group’s Board of Directors 
(two out of six Directors).

40%

Target for gender diversity 
at Board level, as set by the 
FTSE Women Leaders Review.

3

Three of the Group’s six Directors 
appointed in the past four years.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

63

Related party matters
The Group has a controlling shareholder that 
also has a number of different businesses with 
which the Group has a commercial relationship. 

In order to maintain strong levels of corporate 
governance, and to ensure that these 
business relationships are conducted on 
an arm’s length basis, the Group has both the 
Committee of Independent Directors at the 
Board level and the Executive Related Party 
Matters Committee at the management level.

Parker Review 
The Parker Review was an independent 
review in 2021 led by Sir John Parker, which 
considered how to improve the ethnic and 
cultural diversity of UK Boards to better reflect 
their employee base and the communities 
they serve. In order to encourage progress 
in ethnic diversity, the Parker Review 
proposed a target of one Director from an 
ethnic minority group on the Boards of 
FTSE 250 companies by December 2024.

The search for an independent Non-executive 
Director from a minority ethnic group has 
been launched and is ongoing.

Corporate governance controls
The Group’s financial advisors are Liberum 
Capital Limited (“Liberum”), which also 
provide broking services to the Group. As a 
London-listed company, it is best practice for 
the Company to have a Sponsor to provide 
advice and guidance on certain corporate 
matters, with BDO LLP appointed in this role.

Stakeholder engagement
As a responsible, modern company, we aim to 
engage with our shareholders, to understand 
their concerns and priorities. Shareholder 
engagement is conducted via a range of 
methods – from various reports published on 
an annual basis (Annual Report and Accounts 
and Responsible Business Report), to our 
corporate website and social media channels. 

We also endeavour to engage with 
stakeholders located within Ukraine and 
overseas, with this made possible through 
communications in both Ukrainian and English. 
In 2023, we communicated in both languages 
across the majority of our social media 
channels and the 2022 Responsible Business 
Report, as well as selected press releases.

Please see page 48 for more details of how we 
engage with each of our stakeholder groups.

Non-financial information statement
The Ferrexpo Group complies with the non-financial reporting requirements contained in Sections 414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act 
2006. The table below, and information it refers to, is intended to help stakeholders understand the Company’s position on key non-financial 
matters. This builds on existing reporting that the Company already does under the following frameworks: Global Reporting Initiative, Guidance 
on the Strategic Report (UK Financial Reporting Council), UN Global Compact, UN Sustainable Development Goals and UN Guiding Principles. 
In addition to its Annual Reports, Ferrexpo also publishes a standalone report covering its Responsible Business activities, with the report for 
2022 available on the Group’s website and the report for 2023 expected to be released during the course of 2024.

Reporting requirements

Reports, policies and standards

Additional information

Risks

Environmental

Climate Change Report
Tailings Management

Employees

Ethics and Responsible Business Policy
Code of Conduct
Health and Safety Policy

Human rights

Human Rights Policy
Data Privacy Policy
Anti-Slavery and Trafficking Statement
Information Security

Social matters

Donations Policy
Community Policy

Anti-corruption 
and anti-bribery

Anti-Bribery Policy 
Anti-Money Laundering and 
Counter Terrorist Financing Policy 
Fraud Risk Management 
Whistleblowing Policy

Principal risks and 
impact on business 
activities

Non-financial KPIs

Greenhouse gas emissions (pages 36 to 37)
Energy consumption (page 36)
www.ferrexpo.com/responsibility/protecting-environments

Health and safety (pages 34 to 35)
Diversity, equity and inclusion (pages 60 to 61)
www.ferrexpo.com/responsibility/workforce-development
www.ferrexpo.com/responsibility/safety-performance

Diversity, equity and inclusion (page 60)
Ferrexpo Code of Conduct 
www.ferrexpo.com/about-ferrexpo/corporate-governance/
policies-and-standards

Operating during a time of war (pages 6-7)
Social engagement (page 64)
www.ferrexpo.com/responsibility/supporting-communities

Internal controls (page 119)
Governance (page 62)
Governance Report (pages 93 to 157)
www.ferrexpo.com/about-ferrexpo/corporate-governance/
policies-and-standards
www.ferrexpo.com/whistleblowing

Business Model (page 8)
Risk Management (page 72)
Viability Statement (page 91)
Going Concern Statement (page 155)

Key Performance Indicators (page 14)

Principal Risks, pages 74 
to 90

Principal Risks, pages 74 
to 90

Principal Risks, pages 74 
to 90

Principal Risks, pages 74 
to 90

Principal Risks, pages 74 
to 90

Principal Risks, pages 74 
to 90

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS64

Stakeholder Engagement – Section 172

Ongoing engagement with all stakeholders is 
important so that we can understand what is 
important to them, and how we can generate 
value together.

Further details on the Group’s approach to the matters outlined in Section 172 can be found in the following sections of this report:

Section 172 factor

Key examples

Employees and wider 
workforce

–  Operating during a time of war
–  Responsible Business: Safety
–  Responsible Business: Diversity, equity and inclusion
–  Operating during a time of war: Q&As with various functions and colleagues
–  Case study: Double materiality

Suppliers and 
customers

–  Market Review
–  Strategic Framework
–  Case study: Double Materiality

Local communities

–  Operating during a time of war

Environment

–  Responsible Business: Net Zero pathway 
–  Case study: DR pellet life cycle assessment
–  Case study: Double materiality
–  Scenario analysis selection and TCFD disclosures

High standards of business  –  Business Model

Investors

–  Responsible Business Review
–  Responsible Business: Governance
–  Risk Management

–  Executive Chair’s Statement
–  CFO’s Review
–  Business Model
–  Value Proposition

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Page

06
32
32
45

22
12

06

36
42
38
43

08
32
62
72

02
04
08
10

65

The Group considers its 
stakeholders to include:

1. Workforce

See page 66

2. Customers

See page 67

3. Suppliers

See page 68

4. Communities

See page 69

5. The Environment

See page 69

6.  Government  

and its agencies

See page 70

7. Investors

See page 70

In addition, throughout this report are 12 
Q&As with colleagues in various functions 
across the business discussing how the war 
is affecting how they work, what has changed 
and impacts on our various stakeholders, and 
how they anticipate that they will adapt to 
working life when the war is over. The 
purpose of these Q&A-style case studies are 
to convey a deeper insight into the people 
and culture of Ferrexpo, and the determined 
spirit they collectively demonstrate.

The Board of Directors acts to promote 
the long-term sustainable success of the 
Company for the benefit of shareholders as a 
whole. This long-term sustainable success 
includes governing the business in the short 
term during a time of war and more broadly 
the challenging operating environment in 
Ukraine. In doing so the importance of having 
due regard to the matters set out in Section 
172(1)(a) to (f) of the Companies Act 2006 is 
recognised, notably:

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

the likely consequences of any decision in 
the long term;
the interests of the Company’s employees;
the need to foster the Company’s business 
relationships with suppliers, customers 
and others;
the impact of the Company’s operations 
on the community and the environment;
the desirability of the Company 
maintaining a reputation for high standards 
of business conduct; and 
the need to act fairly as between members 
of the Company.

The Board receives regular training and 
briefings on directors’ duties and updates 
in relation to corporate governance 
developments and stakeholder engagement. 
New directors appointed to the Board receive 
tailored, individual briefings on their duties 
and obligations as part of their induction.

The following section outlines the Group’s 
different stakeholder groups, engagement 
activities conducted in 2023 and feedback 
that was received as part of this work. Each 
section provides an overview of the work 
completed to date in response to this 
feedback, and any further plans that the 
Board has for the year ahead.

How considering stakeholders in 
decision making works in practice
The Group engages regularly with 
stakeholders, with interactions largely led 
by the day-to-day management team with 
Board-level interactions where appropriate. 
Where management-level engagement has 
taken place, feedback is provided to the 
Board by way of regular reporting and 
updates at meetings to help inform decision 
making and ensure stakeholder views and 
considerations are taken into account. 

During Board discussions, the Board 
considers as appropriate the various 
stakeholders’ interests and the potential 
impact of decisions on relevant stakeholder 
groups for the purposes of Section 172 of the 
Companies Act 2006. This includes 
considering competing stakeholder interests 
and the differential impact certain decisions 
may have on different constituencies. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS66

Section 172 continued

1. Workforce

Ferrexpo’s talented and engaged 
workforce is a core strength of 
Ferrexpo’s business, on which we 
continue to rely during a time of war. 
Through a close working relationship 
between employer and employees, 
company and contractors, we are 
able to respond to the evolving needs 
of our workforce.

Our engagement activities in 2023
Ferrexpo aims to communicate with its 
workforce, which is based in a number 
of geographic locations and a range of 
settings, in a variety of ways to communicate 
effectively with different individuals and 
groups in multiple languages. The type 
of communication channels used to 
communicate with members of the workforce 
varies. We use a range of methods including 
electronic communications tools (such as 
email, online learning, electronic bulletins, 
corporate websites and messaging 
platforms), social media channels and 
traditional print media, both our own company 
newspaper in addition to local and national 
media at our operations in Ukraine, and also 
our corporate offices, including Switzerland 
and the United Kingdom.

We engage throughout the calendar year. 
Given that more than 95% of our workforce 
is located in Ukraine, it is important that 
where possible the Board maintains a 
strong presence in the country, both in Kyiv 
and in the region in which we operate.

In normal circumstances, Directors frequently 
visit our operations in Ukraine, however this is 
difficult during a war. But, in December 2023, 
over two days, Ukrainian resident Independent 
Non-executive Director Mr Lisovenko, 
also Non-executive Director Designate 
for workforce engagement, visited our 
operations in Ukraine and hosted a number 
of engagement sessions with a cross section 
representing a range of stakeholder groups 
within our workforce, including operations 
personnel, a selection of middle managers 
from all three business units, senior female 
leaders, alumni of our Fe_munity Women in 
Leadership programmes and people with 
disabilities and community stakeholders.

During the engagement sessions, members 
of the workforce made comments and 
suggestions on a range of matters and 
posed questions for subsequent response 
by the Board. In February 2024, the Board 
considered the comments, concerns, 
suggestions and questions and will provide 
feedback to the workforce via established 
communication channels. For example, 
members of the workforce requested more 
detail in respect of the current approach 
of running one and sometimes two pellet 
lines, in response to logistics constraints 
caused by the war and that the quality of 
personal protective clothing be improved.

In addition to direct engagement, such as 
face-to-face meetings in the workplace, the 
Group utilises its website, public reports and 
social media channels. As of February 2023, 
the Group had over 20,000 followers across 
Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn, with 
the majority of subscribers being located in 
Ukraine. The Group typically issues 20 to 30 
posts on social media a month, with each post 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

representing an opportunity to convey topics 
of interest to stakeholders. These posts not 
only cover corporate news, but also topics of 
important local and national interest and news 
about local personalities, including for example 
a video series about veteran rehabilitation.

Workforce engagement occurs across 
multiple languages, to ensure that the Group 
communicates with both its Ukrainian and 
international stakeholders. The Group has 
communicated on social media platforms 
in both English and Ukrainian for several 
years, and in 2022 published its Responsible 
Business Report in Ukrainian for the first time, 
helping to keep local stakeholders informed 
of the Group’s sustainability initiatives.

Further details on our engagement with 
the workforce can be found in the section 
‘Operating during a time of war’ on pages 
6 to 7, in the sections on ‘Responsible 
business: safety’ on page 34 and ‘Responsible 
business: diversity, equity and inclusion’ 
from page 60, the case study ‘Double 
materiality’ on pages 38 to 40, and in the 
various employee Q&As listed on page 5.

Our response to feedback 
The Board understands the importance of 
Ferrexpo having a strong presence within 
Ukraine, where more than 95% of our 
employees and contractors are based, to 
ensure effective engagement. As such, the 
Board includes two Ukrainian Independent 
Non-executive Directors and one Ukrainian 
Executive Director. Through this presence, 
Vitalii Lisovenko, the Board’s nominated 
representative for workforce engagement, 
was able to visit our operations during 2023.

The Board regularly interacts with the 
Group’s executive management team 
through its various committees, and the 
Health, Safety, Environment and Community 
(“HSEC”) Committee comprises three 
Directors of the Group and one member 
of the executive management team. 

Plans for engagement in 2024
Engagement activities will continue into 
2024 to understand the evolving concerns 
and requirements of our workforce. 

Mr Lisovenko, independent Non-
executive Director Designate for workforce 
engagement, will visit our operations in 
Ukraine and host a number of engagement 
sessions with a cross section representing 
a range of stakeholder groups within our 
workforce and community stakeholders. 

The Group typically conducts an employee 
engagement survey every year and intends 
to complete such an exercise during 2024.

67

2. Customers

WE ARE DETERMINED

Ralf Jina and Sandra Groher

Ralf and Sandra work at  
First-DDSG, our Danube barging 
business. Balázs manages logistics 
and commercial matters, and 
Sandra HR related matters, 
including crewing activities.

As the war progresses, what has 
changed for you?
We had to shift operations from the 
Upper Danube region and long distance 
routes to the Lower Danube shuttling to 
alternative Black Sea ports, rethinking 
our strategy and operations, in particular 
how we manage our fleet of 220 vessels 
and barges. We redirected many barges 
to support increased Ukrainian demand 
there. There were difficulties initially, for 
example crews could not simply leave 
Ukraine; so we had to bring the vessels 
to the people, not the other way around. 
We are proud we stepped up to the 
challenge and supported Ukraine.

What has the war taught you about 
how you do your job?
It’s shown us the need to act swiftly, 
even how to anticipate the next move 
and stay ahead. It’s not enough to simply 
’react’ to a change, one has to adopt a 
strategic manner. For example, there was 
a period when good crews were hard to 
come by and retain so we kept in close 
contact with our crewing companies 
to really understand the needs of the 
crews and respond accordingly. It’s been 
challenging, but also rewarding to see 
what we can achieve in uncertain times.

How will the end of the war affect 
your work?
There will be more change, but we feel 
ready for it. We’ll be taking everything we’ve 
learned during this period and use it in 
the future. I’m confident that the lessons 
we have learnt will guide us through the 
post-war adjustments. We know now that 
we can deal with whatever comes our way.

Our customers are important to the 
business, with investments in high 
grade and high quality forms of iron 
ore designed to meet their needs. 
Through constructive, long-term 
customer relationships, the Group 
aims to generate value for all 
stakeholder groups.

Our engagement activities in 2023
The Group continues to experience 
material disruption to its logistics network 
following Russia’s full-scale invasion 
of Ukraine in February 2022, which 
resulted in limited access to Ukrainian 
Black Sea ports and reduced access 
to the Ukrainian railway network.

As a result, our ability to deliver our products 
to customers in 2023 was limited to 4.2 million 
tonnes sold during the year (2022: 6.2 million 
tonnes). In the early stages of the war, our 
marketing team held extensive discussions 
with customers, and through strong, long-
standing relationships the Group was able 
to redirect sales to European customers 
by rail and later via alternative Black Sea 
ports to the MENA region and Europe. 

Further details of the restrictions imposed as 
a consequence of the conflict are provided 
in the section ‘Operating during a time of 
war’ on pages 6 to 7 and in the section 
‘Market Review’ on pages 22 to 25.

Our response to feedback
Customers are increasingly focused on climate 
change and sustainability, particularly in 
Europe due to legislative or other requirements 
for steel producers to reduce their carbon 
emissions. To provide clarity to customers, 
the Board was proud to issue the Group’s 
first standalone Climate Change Report in 
December 2022 and later accelerate its carbon 
reduction targets. Changes included an 
increase to the medium-term (2030) emissions 
reduction target to 50% (from 30%) and 
inclusion of Scope 3 emissions targets within 
the Group’s suite of forward-facing targets. 

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
68

Section 172 continued

3. Suppliers

The Group’s suppliers are 
important for sustainable 
operations, especially during a 
time of war. Suppliers represent 
a principal aspect of the local 
and global footprint that the Group 
creates through its day-to-day 
business activities, which helps 
develop a positive local presence 
and a brand that is identifiable to 
other stakeholder groups such as 
potential investors and customers. 
Through conducting ourselves in a 
clear and transparent fashion, we 
hope to also promote Ukraine as a 
destination for other businesses. 

Our engagement activities in 2023
The Group’s operations paid a total of 
US$514 million to suppliers in 2023 (2022: 
US$912 million). Given the location of our 
operations and the situation in Ukraine, the 
Group has continued to engage extensively 
with its suppliers – many of whom are facing 
similar challenges to Ferrexpo. It has been 
important to seek clarification on the status 
of their operations during the war and where 
necessary identify alternative suppliers 
where disruptions have occurred or the 
risk of disruption is perceived to be high. 

Through engagement, the Group has 
continued to raise awareness of the need for 
humanitarian support caused by the invasion 
and encouraged customers to make donations 
directly to various relief funds. We are grateful 
for these acts of kindness. The Group is 
proud to have long-standing relationships 
with a number of local and international 
suppliers, which have helped to support the 
Group during the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Further details on our engagement with 
suppliers can be found in the section 
‘Operating during a time of war’ on 
pages 6 to 7.

Our response to feedback
The Group is an important player in the 
local economy in the Poltava Region, and 
therefore it is important that it maintains 
constructive relationships with suppliers, 
for example by paying suppliers promptly. 

By imposing a Code of Conduct and engaging 
with suppliers, the Group aims to reduce 
the risks associated to it through issues 
in the supply chain such as environmental 
concerns and modern slavery.

WE ARE DETERMINED

Petro Tsektor, Road Vehicle Driver, FPM

Petro’s driving career spans 23 
years, though he only joined 
Ferrexpo ten years ago. He started 
at Ferrexpo driving mining trucks, 
before he changed to driving cars 
in 2016.

What is the biggest impact the war 
has had on your job?
After the full-scale invasion, not much 
has changed in my work. I always check 
the vehicle several times before the trip, 
its technical condition and the availability 
of all documents. I’m steadfast; I make 
sure to reach the destination on time.

What has the war taught you about 
how you do your job?
Under martial law conditions, I pay particular 
attention to the route, especially if I am on 
a business trip to populated areas that are 
close to the battle front. I need to think, in 
advance, of several options for the route, 
taking into account the weather conditions 
and focusing on safety of both my 
passengers and myself. For me, the main 
thing is to be optimistic about every trip!

What do you look forward to most 
about your job when the war ends?
After the Victory, I want to travel around 
Ukraine to hero-cities and settlements that 
were most affected by enemy attacks. 
It will be important to always remember, 
and tell the next generations about 
what happened. Of course, there will be 
more business trips, and the emotional 
state of my passengers will be better.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

69

Ferrexpo has spent US$25 million on over 100 
projects and initiatives. Projects are individually 
reviewed and approved by members of the 
HSEC Committee, to ensure that governance 
standards are maintained. Many projects are 
proposed by local community leaders and 
groups. The Group will continue to support 
Ukraine and communities throughout the 
country through the Ferrexpo Humanitarian 
Fund, the Ferrexpo Charity Fund and 
associated CSR funds during this difficult time.

Plans for engagement in 2024
As the war prolongs, the needs of our 
workforce, local communities and Ukrainian 
society are changing. The original focus on the 
immediate need to provide accommodation, 
food and medical services has lessened and 
the focus is shifting to longer-term issues such 
as veteran rehabilitation and mental health. 
The HSEC Committee is reviewing how best 
to respond to the evolving needs and provide 
targeted support in the appropriate manner. 

5. The 
Environment

The natural environment is important 
to the Group as it demonstrates the 
present day success of our business 
with multiple stakeholder groups and 
also that of future generations. The 
natural environment encompasses 
many factors, from greenhouse gas 
emissions and emissions of other 
gases into the air, to our interactions 
with the water cycle, land 
rehabilitation and biodiversity around 
our operations, amongst others.

Our engagement activities in 2023
Climate change is a key focus area 
for a number of stakeholder groups, 
with rising pressure to act to limit 
the effects of climate change. 

Engagement on the natural environment 
occurs with local and national government 
bodies to ensure compliance with local 
legislation and best practice. Engagement 
with local communities is conducted through 
regular meetings with community leaders 
and representatives. The Group interacts 
with its workforce through regular staff 
meetings and internal communications, 
which includes feedback mechanisms 
to ensure local voices are heard. 

Engagement helps suppliers improve 
their services, as well as gaining a better 
perception of the Ferrexpo business, in turn 
facilitating the Group’s ability to operate.

Plans for engagement in 2024
Supplier engagement is expected to 
continue into 2024 with a similar focus as 
in previous years – seeking local goods 
and services where possible, to support 
the Ukrainian economy, and engaging to 
ensure supplier governance throughout 
Ferrexpo’s supply chain. In addition, the 
Group is increasingly engaging to understand 
the greenhouse gas emissions footprint 
of suppliers, as this is directly relevant 
to Ferrexpo’s Scope 3 emissions.

Plans for engagement in 2024
The Group is in regular contact with its 
customers. This includes regular meetings 
with actual or potential customers and also 
visits to their operations around the world. 
One area of focus for the Group is the DR 
pellet market, which is forecast to outpace 
other iron ore products in terms of demand, 
especially in Europe and the MENA region.

4. Communities

Our social licence to operate is 
earned by successful engagement 
with the communities where we 
operate and broader society. 
Ferrexpo has established close 
relationships with its local 
communities and continues  
to work hard to maintain their respect. 

Our engagement activities in 2023
The Group has developed strong ties with 
local communities. Ferrexpo is a large local 
and economic contributor in the Poltava 
Region. We also understand the connection 
between our workforce in Ukraine and 
the communities, many of whom rely on 
Ferrexpo for their socio-economic stability.

Our deep relationships with local stakeholders 
enabled us to engage quickly and 
meaningfully at the start of the full-scale 
invasion in February 2022 to understand the 
immediate material issues and risks facing 
communities and how we could effectively 
respond with humanitarian support.

We also published our Responsible Business 
Report in Ukrainian to foster engagement 
with local audiences on sustainability topics, 
which are particularly relevant to them. 

The Group regularly engages with communities 
through traditional forms of communication 
(for example, printed media and local television 
channels), and electronic media such as 
the Group’s websites, public reports and 
dual-language social media channels.

Further details on our engagement with 
communities can be found in the section 
‘Operating during a time of war’ on pages 
6 to 7.

Our response to feedback
The Group regularly provides direct support 
to local communities through the Ferrexpo 
Humanitarian Fund which has been in place 
since the start of the war and the Ferrexpo 
Charity Fund, which has been in operation 
since 2011. During exceptional times, such as 
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the 
global Covid-19 pandemic, the Board has 
sought to provide additional support, to 
respond to extraordinary situations. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS70

Section 172 continued

Further details on our environmental 
approach can be found in the responsible 
business sections of this report, including 
‘Net Zero pathway’ on page 36, TCFD 
disclosures from page 43 and Climate 
scenario analysis from page 48. Two case 
studies on DR pellet life cycle analysis on 
page 42 and double materiality on pages 38 
to 40 also provide context on the activities 
we concluded in 2023.

Our response to feedback
The Board approved the publication of the 
inaugural Climate Change Report in December 
2022. This report represented the output of 
our collaboration work with environmental 
consultants Ricardo Plc (“Ricardo”). Through 
this work stream, the Group has developed 
a potential pathway to net zero iron ore 
pellet production, as well as climate scenario 
modelling to determine risks and opportunities 
related to Ferrexpo’s business and industry 
sector. For more information, please see 
the Group’s website (www.ferrexpo.com).

In 2022, the Group also set revised, more 
ambitious greenhouse gas emissions 
reduction targets. The Group is now 
targeting a 50% reduction in its Scope 1 
and 2 emissions by 2030 (on a combined 
basis per unit of production).

In addition, the Board maintains climate 
change as a standing agenda item for all 
scheduled Board meetings and HSEC 
Committee maintains climate change as a 
standing item on the agenda for all meetings, 
with meetings held on a quarterly basis.

Executive remuneration is also aligned 
to the Group’s climate change goals, 
with performance targets relating 
to climate-related matters.

Plans for engagement in 2024
The Group continued to maintain reporting 
of its environmental footprint in 2023. 
This included the completion of the life 
cycle analysis of the Group’s DR pellets 
to produce steel in an electric arc furnace. 
The outcomes of this work are highlighted 
in this report. The Group has plans to 
undertake a further life cycle analysis of 
certain other products during 2024.

6. Government 
and its agencies

Ferrexpo engages with governments 
in the countries in which the Group 
operates through dialogue with 
representatives of host governments 
and local authorities. In each 
jurisdiction, the Group aims to 
develop long-term, positive 
relationships through regular 
and transparent interactions. 

Our engagement activities in 2023
The Group has a number of legal permits 
and licences required to operate in host 
countries, which are administered by the 
Group’s internal legal and government 
liaison teams, as well as external advisors.

Engagement with the Ukrainian government 
agencies is critical due to the ongoing 
war in Ukraine. Lines of communication 
are necessary to allow the Board and 
management to understand the numerous 
changes to the operating environment, which 
has changed significantly throughout the war. 
This includes information sharing to keep 
our workforce safe, updates on the supply of 
power and access to transport and logistics 
infrastructure from port closures, limitations 
to rail access and the availability of electricity, 
amongst other effects. Additionally, we have 
kept in constant contact with the government 
to understand the needs of communities 
across Ukraine as the war evolves.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Further details on our engagement 
with government and its agencies are 
discussed in the Executive Chair’s 
Review on pages 2 and 3.

Our response to feedback
Through engagement, the Group aims to 
establish a constructive line of communication 
with host governments, to facilitate further 
investment and continued operations in 
each country. The Group has operations 
and corporate offices across seven different 
countries, in addition to marketing offices in 
a further three countries, ensuring the Group 
has a global presence in a global marketplace. 

Plans for engagement in 2024
The Group aims to continue to proactively 
engage with government stakeholders in the 
jurisdictions where it operates, in line with 
previous years.

7. Investors

As a company quoted on the London 
Stock Exchange, global investors are 
important to Ferrexpo, especially 
our international shareholder base. 
Through developing close ties with 
investors of all sizes, the Group  
can promote itself as well as raise 
awareness of Ukraine’s potential.

Our engagement activities in 2023
The Group has maintained a premium 
listing on the London Stock Exchange 
since June 2007 and as a result has a 
large investor base, comprising more 
than 500 institutions or organisations 
and private shareholders as of January 

2024, located in more than 30 countries 
or jurisdictions. The Group’s independent 
shareholders range from international 
investment funds managing billions of 
dollars, to individual private shareholders. 

The Group regularly meets in person with 
investors in London, Europe and North 
America, and regularly speaks to investors 
located around the world. Direct engagement 
with investors can take the form of ad hoc 
meetings, video calls or telephone calls, as 
well as results calls following either the full 
year or interim results in March and August, 
respectively. Following each set of financial 
results, the Group will liaise with the sales 
team at its broker Liberum to arrange a 
series of investor meetings, referred to as an 
investor roadshow. Additionally, the Group 
regularly speaks to the analyst community 
at a number of investment banks and events 
that they host. Through this interaction, the 
Group is able to assist its analyst following 
to produce accurate and considered 
investment research on Ferrexpo.

In addition to the above activities, the Group 
also hosts its Annual General Meeting 
(“AGM”) usually held in May each year, which 
represents an opportunity for all investors to 
meet and engage meaningfully with the Board. 

Further details on engagement with 
investors can be found in our value 
proposition on pages 10 and 11. 

Our response to feedback
The Group aims to communicate with all 
shareholders and uses a range of methods 
to do so. In 2023, we have published two 
formal reports for our stakeholders – an 
Annual Report and Accounts in April and a 
Responsible Business Report in December. 

Given investors’ increasing reliance on 
sustainability data in making investment 
decisions, it is evident that there is a need 
to ensure the quality of this information is 
high. As such, we have sought to undertake 
an independent assurance process of our 
safety and carbon emissions data for 2023.

Plans for engagement in 2024
The Group has a regular schedule of 
engagement activities throughout the calendar 
year, including the Group’s annual reporting 
suite, investor roadshows associated with 
financial results, quarterly production reports 
and attendance at investor conferences. In 
addition, the Group provides numerous press 
releases, presentations and social media 
postings, which are produced as required for 
company news and events or otherwise.

71

WE ARE DETERMINED

Nick Bias and Vladyslav Mortikov

Nick and Vladyslav manage the 
communications function for the 
business. They are responsible  
for investor relations, external  
and internal communications, 
including social media.

As the war has progressed, what 
has changed?
We are more focussed on our employees 
than ever, aiming to keep them informed 
and as positive as possible. We have 
broadened our social media activities, 
improved frequency and formats, 
launched monthly updates so that we can 
communicate directly and more frequently.

As the business is right-sized we must 
work harder with a smaller budget. 
We maintain our regulatory reporting, 
focus on select opportunities, and use 
social media more. We produce most 
of our own content, and are proud of 
our video work, especially a series we 
produced about veteran rehabilitation.

What has the war taught you?
Being quiet is not an option. We have 
learnt that we have plenty to say and 
contribute. We know that the realities on 
the ground are often different from what 
is reported, so our role must be to help 
broaden awareness, and share our real-life 
perspectives. Everything we do requires 
consideration because there are so many 
complex issues and sensitivities to balance.

When the war is over, what will be 
different for you?
It is currently our responsibility to report 
internally and externally about colleagues 
killed serving in the Armed Forces of 
Ukraine. We look forward to the day  
when we do not have to do this and  
gladly refocus internal communications  
to supporting the rehabilitation of veterans 
back into the workforce and the restart  
of production capacity.

We recognise that interest in Ferrexpo  
will be intense when the war ends. We 
are curiously sensitive because interest 
has been limited during a time of war, 
however, we are already preparing.

Q&A

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS72

Risk Management

Assessing and 
managing risk

Ferrexpo identifies and assesses risks based on each 
risk’s probability of occurrence and the severity of any 
event. The Group aims to mitigate the potential impact of 
each risk through its management of day-to-day activities, 
taking a prudent approach to risk where possible.

Risk assessment for 2023
The risk matrix opposite depicts the 
Principal Risks facing the Group. 

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 
February 2022, has had a significant impact 
on the Group’s ability to operate. Further 
details on the conflict risk facing the Group 
are provided on page 75 of this report.

In addition to the war in Ukraine, a secondary 
effect of the conflict is the increased political 
alignment within Ukraine. It is unclear as to 
the eventual impact of this change on the 
Group, which in turn creates a potential 
risk for the Group should the political 
landscape shift adversely. Further details 
of the risks associated with operating 
in Ukraine are provided on page 76.

Climate change is a rising Principal Risk, 
and the Group is facing both physical 
and transitional risks, which requires 
increased reporting requirements. This 
topic is covered on pages 36 to 37 and 
90 of this report, with particular reference 
to climate change related risk reporting 
under the Task Force on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) framework.

Risk identification
Ferrexpo aims to manage risks across its 
business through the early identification 
of potential risks before they emerge, 
with senior managers and the Group’s 
executive management team responsible 
for maintaining risk registers for each area 
of the Ferrexpo business. Risk registers 
are regularly reviewed and updated, 
with local risk owners reporting to senior 
management teams on a regular basis.

The Group risk register records risks on the 
basis of the likelihood of occurrence and 
level of potential impact on the Ferrexpo 
business. A total of 49 risks were included 
on the Group risk register as of December 
2023, with risks ranging from the war in 
Ukraine (both direct and indirect), risks 
relating to operating in Ukraine, operational 
risks such as the risk of a pit wall failure, 
health and safety-related risks, and risks 
relating to information technology and climate 
change. Further to the Group risk register, 
which records the risks with the most serious 
potential impact and likelihood of occurrence, 
operating entities maintain their own local 
risk registers, which feed into the Group 
risk register. In 2023, the Group continued 
to develop and operate an enterprise 
risk management (“ERM”) tool that was 
implemented in 2022 to record and monitor 
risks, which is the platform for the reporting 
and assessment of risks within the Group.

The Group considers emerging risks to 
be risks that are newly developing, or 
increasing in potential severity of impact, or 
changing risks that are difficult to quantify.

The risks that are assessed by the 
Group’s management to be Principal 
Risks are presented on pages 74 to 90.

Risk mitigation
Risks are inherent in operating a business 
and it is through effective risk identification, 
risk management, prudent decision making 
and other risk mitigation measures that the 
Group can understand and mitigate the 
risks that the business faces. The Group’s 
management team, however, understands 
that it cannot eliminate all risk. The Group’s 
approach to risk mitigation for each of the 
Group’s Principal Risks is presented opposite.

Risk governance framework
Risks are reported internally on a monthly 
basis, as part of the Finance, Risk 
Management and Compliance (“FRMC”) 
Committee, with the Group’s senior leadership 
team reviewing the Group-level risk matrix, 
which plots the likelihood of occurrence 
against the potential severity of impact, and 
identifying material changes in either variable 
to all of the risks listed. Risks are reported on 
the Group risk register to the FRMC Committee 
on a monthly basis, with each risk attributed 
a potential monetary impact should an event 
occur. The FRMC Committee reports to the 
Group’s Executive Committee, which in turn 
reports to the Board, which has the ultimate 
responsibility for the Group’s approach to 
risk management. The Audit Committee, a 
sub-committee of the Board, assists the Board 
in its regular monitoring of the risks faced by 
the Group. The Group’s internal audit function 
assists with the process of risk review, and 
conducts ad hoc reviews of risk management 
controls and procedures. For more information 
on the Audit Committee’s monitoring and 
assessment of the effectiveness of the risk 
management and internal control systems, 
see the Audit Committee Report on page 114.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

73

Risk management process

Ferrexpo Board

–  Takes overall responsibility for maintaining 

sound risk management and internal 
control systems.

–  Sets strategic objectives and defines  

risk appetite.

–  Monitors the nature and extent of risk 

exposure, which includes principal and 
emerging risks.

Audit Committee

Executive Committee

–  Supports the Board in monitoring risk  

exposure and risk appetites.

–  Reviews effectiveness of risk management  

and control systems.

–  Assesses and mitigates Group-wide risk.
–  Monitors internal controls.

Health, Safety, Environment and 
Community (“HSEC”) Committee

–  Oversees corporate social responsibility 

related matters and performance.

–  Has specific focus on safety and climate 

change related risks.

Finance, Risk Management 
and Compliance (“FRMC”) Committee

–  Monitors centralised financial 
risk  management structures.
 Monitors Group compliance.

– 

Internal audit function

– 

 Supports the Audit Committee in reviewing 
the effectiveness of risk management.

–  Tests internal control systems and 

recommends improvements.

Operational level

– 

 Risk management processes and internal 
controls embedded across all Ferrexpo 
operations.

Principal risks materiality matrix 

The Principal Risks identified in the heat map 
to the right highlight which risks could have 
the greatest severity of impact on the Group’s 
operations and viability.

Key

1.1   Conflict risk
1.2   Ukraine country risk
1.3   Counterparty risk
2.   Global demand for steel
3.1    Changes in pricing methodology
3.2    Iron ore prices
3.3    Pellet premiums
3.4    Seaborne freight rates
4.1   Risks relating to producing our products
4.2   Risks relating to the delivery of our products
4.3   Risks relating to health and safety
4.4   Risks relating to operating costs
4.5    Risks relating to information technology 

and cybersecurity
 Risks relating to climate change

5.  

T
C
A
P
M
I

F
O

L
E
V
E
L

Please see pages 74 to 90  
of this report for a full  
summary of Principal Risks 

4.5

4.4

1.2

1.1

5.

1.3

3.4

2.

3.2

3.3

3.1

4.1

4.2

4.3

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

LIKELIHOOD

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
74

Principal Risks

Understanding  
risks and our  
business model

Principal Risks are those considered to 
have the greatest potential impact on 
Ferrexpo’s business, assessed on the 
bases of impact and probability.

Each Principal Risk is linked to the 
aspects of the Group’s strategy that 
could be impacted if an event were 
to occur.

1.  Produce high quality pellets. 

2.  Achieve low cost production. 

3.  Maintain strong relationships 
with a network of premium 
customers. 

4.  Conduct business in a safe  
and sustainable manner. 

5.  Retain a balanced approach  

to capital allocation.

Risk currently considered 
to be materially increasing 
in significance to the 
Group’s activities.

Risk currently considered to 
be neither materially increasing 
nor materially decreasing 
in significance to the 
Group’s activities.

Risk currently considered 
to be materially decreasing 
in significance to the 
Group’s activities.

Introduction
This section outlines the Principal Risks facing 
the Group in 2023, each of which have the 
ability to negatively affect the Group, either 
in isolation or in combination with other risk 
areas. Principal Risks are defined as factors 
that may negatively affect the Group’s ability 
to operate in its normal course of business, 
and may be internal, in the form of risks 
derived through the Group’s own operations 
and activities, or external, such as political 
risks, market risks or climate change related 
risks. The Principal Risks listed here are 
neither exhaustive, nor are they mutually 
exclusive, and therefore one risk area may 
negatively impact another risk area.

Principal Risks include, but are not necessarily 
limited to, those that could result in events 
or circumstances that might threaten the 
Group’s business model, future performance, 
solvency or liquidity and reputation.

Risks are inherently unpredictable, and, 
therefore, the risks outlined in this report are 
considered the main risks facing the Group. 
New risks may emerge during the course of 
the coming year, and existing risks may also 
increase or decrease in severity of impact 
and/or likelihood of occurrence, and this is 
why it is important to conduct regular reviews 
of the Group’s risk register throughout the 
year. The Group maintains a more extensive 
list of risks, covering over 40 different risks 
at the Group level, with additional risks 
considered in local risk registers at each 
operating entity. The Group risk register is 
reviewed on a monthly basis for completeness 
and relevance by the Group’s Finance, Risk 
Management and Compliance (“FRMC”) 
Committee, which ultimately reports into the 
Board for further review and approval of the 
risk register. The Group risk register is also 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

reviewed by the Audit Committee at least four 
times a year. The members of the Executive 
Committee manage risk within the business 
on a day-to-day basis. The Committee 
includes the Chief Executive Officer, Chief 
Financial Officer, Chief Marketing Officer, 
Group Chief Human Resources Officer and 
General Director of Ferrexpo Poltava Mining.

The Group’s management team continually 
reviews and updates its view on, and approach 
to, risks facing the Group. This section of the 
Annual Report and Accounts primarily covers 
risks facing the Group in 2023, but also early 
2024, up until the publication date of this 
report. A further update on the Principal Risks 
will be provided in the Interim Financial Results, 
which is due to be published in August 2024.

Key themes
Ongoing war in Ukraine since the 
full-scale invasion in February 2022
On 24 February 2022, Russia launched a 
full-scale military invasion of Ukraine, with 
the conflict continuing into its third year 
as of the date of this report. This event 
has significantly changed the operating 
environment for businesses in Ukraine on 
an unprecedented scale. Please see page 
75 for more information on this risk area.

Ukraine country risk
This area has been listed as a Principal Risk 
facing the Group since listing in 2007, and 
the Group has successfully operated amid 
challenging circumstances for more than 
16 years. The war in Ukraine has served 
to escalate a number of risks relating to 
Ukraine, including risks relating to the 
political environment and the independence 
of the judicial system. Please see page 76 
for more information on this risk area.

Climate change
An important topic for any modern business, 
with discussions with multiple stakeholder 
groups centring on the Group’s efforts to 
reduce emissions both in the Ferrexpo 
business, but also in the Group’s value chain 
(Scope 3 emissions). As a consequence of 
rising stakeholder focus on this topic, the 
Group published its first standalone report on 
climate change in December 2022. Please see 
page 90 for more information on this risk area.

Cybersecurity
As a business seeking to modernise, the 
Group is increasingly reliant on electronic 
software for the management of key 
operational and administrative activities. 
As a business primarily operating in 
Ukraine, the Group has faced heightened 
cybersecurity threats from malicious parties 
since 2014, coinciding with Russia’s initial 
invasion of Ukraine. Please see page 89 
for more information on this risk area.

75

1. Country risk

1.1. Conflict risk (external risk)

Responsibility
Board of Directors including Executive Chair

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

Due to the war, a proportion of the Group’s 
workforce in Ukraine are serving or have 
served in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 
Some have relocated to safer locations. As 
such, the Group faces potential risks around 
being able to adequately skill its operations 
and the associated ancillary services.

Additional risks related to the war in 
Ukraine include, but are not limited to, 
restrictions related to the cost effective and 
timely transport of the Group’s products, 
restrictions in accessing markets, rising 
costs related to reduced output and 
alternative supply arrangements and the 
impact on employee safety and wellbeing. 
A summary of the war’s impacts is 
provided on pages 6 to 7 of this report.

Risk mitigation

The health and safety of the workforce 
is the Group’s primary concern. 

Whilst it is difficult for a company such 
as Ferrexpo to defend itself from direct 
military activities since Russia’s full-scale 
invasion, the Group has taken multiple 
measures to keep its workforce, their 
families and local communities safe from 
the threats posed by Russian aggression. 
Measures have included remote working 
for those able to do so, timing of shift 
patterns to fit with curfew hours, the 
provision of on-site childcare facilities to 
ensure children are close and employees 
are not having to travel unnecessarily, 
construction of new and renovation of 
older bomb shelters and the provision of 
protective equipment such as armoured 
vests and helmets for employees serving 
in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The 
Group has also engaged in extensive 
discussions with local authorities, and has 
stepped up to provide financial assistance 
through the Ferrexpo Humanitarian 
Fund, with oversight by the Board of 
Directors of Ferrexpo to ensure good 
governance in all support activities. Please 
see page 7 for more on this subject. 

The Group will continue to take 
measures as required to protect its 
workforce, and their families and local 
communities, for the duration of the 
war, and during the post-war period 
where continued support is required.

It is over two years since Russia’s full-scale 
invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. 
Ferrexpo’s main operations are in the Poltava 
region of central Ukraine, which has not 
seen any direct combat between Russian 
and Ukrainian forces. Ukraine has, however, 
faced numerous missile and drone strikes, 
including the Poltava region. The Group’s 
facilities have not been directly targeted 
by Russian missile strikes, but a number 
of neighbouring third party facilities such 
as the Kremenchuk oil refinery and state 
owned electricity infrastructure have been 
damaged by such attacks. Such damage can 
affect the Group’s ability to source various 
inputs needed for ongoing production. 

The war in Ukraine is placing a strain on 
the economy of Ukraine, with a number of 
businesses closing, unemployment, and lower 
tax revenues. At the same time, spending 
on the military and social programmes have 
increased. Consequently, the government 
of Ukraine has sought to increase revenues 
through changes to its fiscal policies, such 
as increases to railway tariffs, as well as 
implementing measures to stabilise the 
economy, such as enacting laws for the 
repatriation of funds and currency controls. A 
number of these measures have the potential 
to either directly or indirectly affect Ferrexpo 
negatively through consequences such 
as lower revenues and a more restrictive 
operating environment. Due to the strain 
placed on the Ukrainian economy, the 
exchange rate for the Ukrainian hryvnia 
depreciated significantly at the start of the 
full-scale invasion in 2022. The government 
immediately responded with the introduction 
a peg for the hryvnia to the US dollar set at 
UAH 29.25 per US dollar, however, it was 
forced to devalue the currency to was 36.5 per 
US dollar in July 2022. In October 2023, the 
government announced that it would allow for 
limited fluctuations of its currency, scrapping 
the peg that had been in place since Russia’s 
invasion 20 months earlier, with the central 
bank stating a shift to a “managed flexible 
exchange rate”. This new policy resulted in 
short term volatility. Fluctuation in the Hryvnia 
can have a significant impact on the Group’s 
costs, assets and shareholders’ equity. For 
more information, please see page 28. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS76

Principal Risks continued

1. Country risk (continued)

1.2. Ukraine country risk (external risk)

Responsibility
Board of Directors including Executive Chair

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

The considerations outlined here are 
separate to the risks relating to the 
ongoing war in Ukraine, but some or all of 
them may be exacerbated by the current 
conflict (see page 75 for risks relating 
specifically to the conflict in Ukraine).

Ferrexpo’s main operations are in Ukraine, 
which is considered to be a lower middle 
income economy, under the classifications 
provided by the World Bank1. Ukraine is a 
country that placed at rank 77 in the United 
Nations’ Development Programme’s (“UNDP”) 
Human Development Index (as published in 
the latest report on 8 September 2022)2, and 
is therefore classified as having a “high” level 
of human development (based on factors such 
as life expectancy and levels of education). 
This ranking places it in a similar bracket to 
China (79) and Sri Lanka (73), other countries 
considered to be developing economies. 
As a result of operating in a developing 
economy, the Group is subject to a number of 
elevated risks, such as the fiscal and political 
stability of Ukraine, independence of the 
judiciary, access to key inputs and capital, 
exposure to monopolies and other influential 
businesses (particularly those that are related 
parties to the government of Ukraine), in 
addition to a range of other factors. As a 
result of being a business in a developing 
economy, the Group is exposed to heightened 
risks around corruption, with Ukraine 
placing 116 in Transparency International’s 
Corruption Perceptions Index (“CPI”)3.

Through the Group’s exposure to an operating 
environment in a developing economy, 
Ferrexpo has been subject to a number of 
risk areas that are heightened relative to 
those expected of a developed economy. 
Risks associated with the war in Ukraine are 
covered on page 75 of this report, but there 
are indirect risks associated with the war, such 
as the increasing political unity within Ukraine 
and determination to drive political, fiscal or 
economic change, the latter often associated 
with financial and military agreements struck 
with western governments and organisations.

This change can be exhibited in a number 
of practical applications, which can 
include, but are not limited to, changes 
to the regulatory environment, potential 
increases to tax and royalty rates, increased 
disclosure requirements or operational 
restrictions. Changes may be made as a 
result of government decision making, a 

third party international partner, lender, or 
another party within Ukraine, and therefore 
the rationale for changes may not correlate 
with the official agenda of the government 
of Ukraine. As a result of this local instability, 
which is amplified by the war in Ukraine, 
sources of capital for businesses deriving 
their revenues from Ukraine are limited at 
the present time, which in turn may reduce 
the operational flexibility of the Group.

The independence of the judiciary system 
in Ukraine has been frequently referenced 
in the Principal Risks section of the Group’s 
Annual Report and Accounts, and this is 
a consideration that remains particularly 
relevant for the Group today. As described 
in Note 30 (Commitments, contingencies 
and legal disputes) to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements, the Group is currently 
subject to several legal proceedings in 
Ukraine that are similar in part to previously 
heard legal proceedings, and it cannot be 
guaranteed that the Ukrainian legal system 
will always provide a ruling in line with the 
laws of Ukraine or international law.

On 7 December 2022, Ferrexpo Poltava 
Mining (“FPM”) received a claim in the amount 
of UAH4,727 million (US$124 million as at 
31 December 2023) in respect of contested 
sureties. These contested sureties relate 
to Bank Finance & Credit which the Group 
previously used as its main transactional 
bank in Ukraine. Bank Finance & Credit is 
still going through the liquidation process 
after having been declared insolvent by the 
National Bank of Ukraine and put under 
temporary administration on 18 September 
2015. The counterparty in this claim alleges 
that it acquired rights under certain loan 
agreements originally concluded between 
the Bank Finance & Credit and various 
borrowers by entering into the assignment 
agreement with the State Guarantee Fund on 
6 November 2020. The counterparty further 
claims that FPM provided sureties to Bank 
F&C to ensure the performance of obligations 
under these loan agreements. On 26 January 
2024, the Ukrainian court of appeal has 
confirmed a claim against FPM in the amount 
of UAH4,727 million (US$124 million as at 
31 December 2023). On 30 January 2024, 
FPM filed an appeal to the Supreme Court 
in Ukraine and the first hearing scheduled 
for 20 March 2024 did not take place. 
Following the appointment of a new panel of 
judges, on 1 April 2024 the Supreme Court 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

suspended the possible enforcement of the 
decision of the court of appeal. A Supreme 
Court hearing on 17 April 2024 considered 
primarily procedural matters and the next 
court hearing is scheduled for 27 May 2024.

Although the Group remains of the view that 
FPM has compelling arguments to defend 
its positions, the Group has recognised a 
full provision totalling US$124 million for 
this ongoing legal dispute. As at the date 
of approval of these consolidated financial 
statements, no enforcement procedures have 
commenced and on 1 April 2024 the Supreme 
Court suspended the possible enforcement 
of the decision of the Ukrainian court of 
appeal, so that such enforcement procedures 
cannot be initiated by the claimant until a final 
decision is made by the Supreme Court, or 
the Supreme Court’s suspension order is 
otherwise lifted. If the final Supreme Court 
ruling is not in favour of FPM, the claimant 
may take steps to appoint either a state or a 
private bailiff and request the commencement 
of the enforcement procedures, which could 
have a material negative impact on the Group’s 
business activities and its ability to continue 
as a going concern, as the assets of FPM 
could be seized or subject to a forced sale. 
In addition to the afore-mentioned claim, a 
supplier and related party to the Group filed an 
application to open bankruptcy proceedings 
(“creditor protection proceedings”) against 
the Group’s major subsidiary in Ukraine. The 
possible commencement of the enforcement 
of the decision of the Ukrainian court of 
appeal, which is currently suspended by 
a decision of the Supreme Court, and the 
possible opening of creditor protection 
proceedings might potentially affect the 
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern 
and, as a consequence, its viability.

The contested sureties claim and decision 
of the court of appeal are other examples 
of the risk of operating in a dynamic and 
adverse political landscape in Ukraine, 
which creates additional challenges 
for both the Group’s subsidiaries in 
Ukraine and also for the Group itself.

As referenced in the Group’s previous public 
reporting, including in the Group’s Interim 
Results published in August 2023, there are 
outstanding allegations relating to the Group’s 
controlling shareholder, Kostyantin Zhevago, 
that remain unresolved, and there is a risk 
that assets owned or controlled (or alleged 
to be owned or controlled) by the Group’s 

77

1. Country risk (continued)

1.2. Ukraine country risk (external risk) (continued)

controlling shareholder may be subject to 
restrictions, in Ukraine or elsewhere, or that 
the Group may be impacted by, or become 
involved in, legal proceedings relating to 
these matters, in Ukraine or elsewhere.

As disclosed in 2022 annual report and 
accounts, subsequent to the detention of 
Mr Zhevago in France on 27 December 2022 
at the request of the authorities in Ukraine, 
the Supreme Court of France rejected the 
appeal in November 2023 and ruled that 
Mr Zhevago should not be extradited to 
Ukraine. The legal case relates to the potential 
extradition of Mr Zhevago, and associated 
legal claims being made in Ukraine, and 
remains outstanding as of the date of this 
report. The risks relating to the Group as 
a result of this legal action, and potential 
further legal action, cannot be accurately 
estimated at the present time, nor can the 
potential timeline for resolving any matters.

As a consequence of recent events relating to 
the Group’s controlling shareholder, as outlined 
above, the Group may experience adverse 
effects, such as negative media attention, a 
reduced ability to operate within Ukraine and 
overseas due to negative perceptions of the 
Group, and a restricted operating environment 
for aspects of the Group’s business, such 
as closure (or suspension) of relationships 
with stakeholder groups such as banking 
services. The Group’s relationships both 
upstream and downstream may also be 
negatively impacted by events related to the 
Group’s controlling shareholder, such that 
the Group is limited or impaired in its ability 
to do business overseas in a specific country 
or region. In addition, restrictions imposed 
on the Group’s controlling shareholder (or 
negative perceptions of the Group’s controlling 
shareholder) may potentially have an adverse 
effects on the Group within Ukraine, with a 
restriction on the Group’s ability to successfully 
operate its business model. A number of legal 
claims or legislative actions within Ukraine 
are known as of today – as detailed in this 
section, and further actions to restrict the 
Group’s ability to operate may arise in the 
future. It is difficult for the Group to predict 
the scale or nature of such restrictions, and 

1.  Source: World Bank, link. (Accessed 24 February 2024)
2.  Source: UNDP, link. (Accessed 23 February 2024)
3.  Source: Transparency International, link. (Accessed 

26 February 2024)

therefore the Group is limited in its ability to 
pre-empt and mitigate risks in this area.

The Group is subject to a number of 
actions by the government of Ukraine that 
threaten to destabilise, or have the effect 
of destabilising, the operating environment 
in which the Group exists. For example, in 
previous years, the government of Ukraine 
has cancelled exploration licences by 
Presidential decree, providing minimal detail 
in terms of an explanation or rationale. 

As previously referenced in the Group’s 
2021 Annual Report and Accounts, in June 
2021, the government of Ukraine cancelled a 
mining licence for an early-stage exploration 
project known as Galeschynske, which is a 
licence held by Ferrexpo Belanovo Mining 
and located to the north of the Belanovo mine 
(without forming part of this mine). This matter 
remains outstanding, and there remains a 
risk that this dispute may increase in scale 
or severity for the Group. The Group has 
been informed of other licence disputes by 
the government, which are similar in scale 
to the licence dispute discussed above. It is 
difficult for the Group to predict the outcome 
of existing licence disputes, and whether 
new claims and/or disputes may arise in 
relation to the Group’s operating licences. 

In March 2023 restrictions were placed on 
shares held by Ferrexpo AG (“FAG”), the 
Group’s Swiss subsidiary, in three main 
operating subsidiaries of the Group in 
Ukraine, covering 50.3% of the shares held 
in each subsidiary. The Kyiv Commercial 
Court ordered the arrest (freeze) of 50.3% 
of FAG’s shareholding in each of Ferrexpo 
Poltava Mining (“FPM”), Ferrexpo Yeristovo 
Mining (“FYM”) and Ferrexpo Belanovo Mining 
(“FBM”). This court order was issued by the 
Kyiv Commercial Court during a hearing in 
the commercial litigation between the Deposit 
Guarantee Fund and Mr. Zhevago, the Group’s 
controlling shareholder, in relation to the 
liquidation of Bank Finance & Credit in 2015. 
The Group’s subsidiaries affected by this court 
order, including FAG, filed appeals in Ukraine 
to remove the restrictions. The court of appeal 
refused on 26 July 2023 to satisfy the appeals 
of FAG, FPM, FYM and FBM in relation to the 
restriction covering 50.3% of corporate rights in 
FPM, FYM and FBM. The Group’s subsidiaries 
filed cassation appeals to the Supreme Court 
of Ukraine. On 10 January 2024, the Supreme 
Court in Ukraine rejected the cassation appeals 
and the restrictions in the Deposit Guarantee 
Fund case remain effective. For more details of 
this case please see Note 30 Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Also in relation to the commercial litigation 
between the National Bank of Ukraine 
(the “NBU”) and Mr. Zhevago, the Group’s 
controlling shareholder, in relation to the 
personal surety of Mr. Zhevago for the loan 
provided by the NBU to the Bank Finance & 
Credit, the Chief State Bailiff of the Ministry 
of Justice of Ukraine issued a resolution 
on arrest of debtor’s property as part of 
intended enforcement proceedings. The 
state bailiff has imposed an arrest on part of 
the corporate rights of 50.3% of the issued 
share capital of FYM and FBM, assuming 
that these rights are owned by Mr. Zhevago. 

FAG filed lawsuits in October 2023 to cancel 
the arrest and to block the enforcement 
procedure. On 30 November 2023, a court 
of first instance suspended the enforcement 
proceeding to forcefully sell Ferrexpo AG’s 
corporate rights in FYM and FBM. The state 
bailiff filed an appeal. For more details of this 
case please see Note 30 (Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes).

As previously referenced in the Group’s 2022 
Annual Report and Accounts, a number of the 
Group’s subsidiaries in Ukraine received letters 
from the Office of the Prosecutor General, 
notifying them of an ongoing investigation 
into a potential underpayment of royalties 
between 2018 and 2021 (the “Investigation”). 
On 3 February 2023, one of the Group’s senior 
managers in Ukraine received a notice of 
suspicion in relation to this Investigation. On 
6 February 2023, as part of the Investigation, 
a court order was issued in Ukraine freezing 
the bank accounts of Ferrexpo Poltava Mining 
(“FPM”). These actions by the government 
of Ukraine mirror actions taken in similar 
investigations into other metals and mining 
companies in Ukraine, and therefore represent 
a scenario that the Group was aware of and 
able to partially mitigate the associated risks. It 
is important to note that the Group may not be 
able to successfully challenge this court order 
to freeze FPM’s bank accounts and may not 
be able to successfully challenge the claims 
being made as part of the Investigation. The 
Group has managed to get certain aspects 
of this court order to be repealed, enabling 
the Group to pay certain amounts such as 
salaries and taxes (but other restrictions 
remain in place).On 31 October 2023, a notice 
of suspicion was delivered to another top 
manager. On 13 November 2023, the court 
approved the bail in the amount of close to 
UAH 800 million. An appeal was filed, and 
after several court dates were postponed, the 
next hearing is scheduled for 29 April 2024. 

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS78

Principal Risks continued

1. Country risk (continued)

1.2. Ukraine country risk (external risk) (continued)

In addition to the royalties investigation, 
on 10 January 2023 the State Bureau of 
Investigations (“SBI”) in Ukraine and on 
17 January 2023 The National Police of 
Ukraine performed several searches in respect 
of investigations on alleged illegal extraction 
of minerals (“rubble”). FPM’s position is that 
the minerals in question are not a separate 
mineral resource, but that it is a waste product 
resulting from the crushing of iron ore during 
the technical process for the production of 
iron ore pellets. The sales of the rubble were 
subject to inspections by the State Service 
for Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine for many 
years and were suspended by the Group 
in September 2021. The outcome of such 
investigations are the notices of suspicion 
issued to the management of FPM by the 
SBI on 29 June 2023 and by the National 
Policy of Ukraine on 22 September 2023 with 
subsequent payments of bails totalling UAH122 
million (US$3 million at this point of time) and 
UAH400 million (US$11 million at this point 
in time), respectively, that were approved by 
the court. In the pre-trial investigation of the 
rubble case and following an application from 
the prosecutor to arrest (freeze) all rail wagons 
and railway access tracks owned by FPM, 
a court of first instance issued the order to 
do so. FPM filed an appeal and a hearing of 
the court of appeal on 30 October 2023 the 
court of appeal confirmed the arrest of assets 
(freeze), but refused to provide clarifications 
on the exact scope of the order which created 
an alleged restriction on the use of one type of 
FPM’s rail cars. Since that time FPM has not 
been using this type of rail cars (totalling 1,339 
units), but continues to use another type of 
its rail cars (totalling 1,043 units). The Group 
is engaging with the authorities in Ukraine 
and intends to appeal the claims issued as 
part of these investigations. Stakeholders 
should note that the Group may not be able 
to successfully challenge the claims being 
made as part of these pre-trail investigations. 

For more details of these cases see  
Note 30 Commitments, contingencies 
and legal disputes. 

The Group’s exposure to operating in Ukraine 
can result in high velocity risks. Risk velocity 
relates to how fast a risk may escalate in 
scale and affect an organisation, with high 
velocity risks considered to be those that move 
rapidly from a starting point of having a low 
likelihood and scale of impact, to having a high 
likelihood and scale of impact. Examples of 

high velocity risks would be natural disasters 
and armed conflict, both of which could 
be difficult to predict in advance and could 
have a significant impact on a business. 

The risk factors discussed here in this section, 
either individually or in combination, have 
the ability to materially adversely affect the 
Group’s ability to operate its production 
and other facilities, ability to export its iron 

ore products, access to new debt facilities 
and ability to repay debt, ability to reinvest 
in the Group’s asset base, either in the form 
of sustaining capital investment (to maintain 
production or expansion), capital investment 
for future growth, or the Group’s ability to 
pay dividends, could result in a material 
financial loss for the Group and could result 
in a loss of control of the Group’s assets.

Ferrexpo has a high profile given its 
international client base and London listing, 
and it is important that Ferrexpo’s Board of 
Directors and relevant senior management 
continue to engage with the Group’s 
stakeholders to effectively communicate 
the economic contribution that Ferrexpo 
makes to Ukraine and to show that it 
operates to high international standards.

As set out in detail in the risk description, the 
Group is involved in a number of ongoing 
legal proceedings, some of which may 
potentially lead to attempted seizures of the 
Group’s funds, movable and immovable 
assets and corporate rights in Ukrainian 
subsidiaries. In case of the commencement 
of enforcement procedures for any ongoing 
legal disputes, the Group will challenge 
every order and action of claimants or 
bailiffs in the court, which is expected to 
delay for a reasonably long period of time 
and block the seizure of funds and assets

Risk mitigation

Ferrexpo operates in accordance with 
relevant laws and utilises internal legal 
counsel and external legal advisors 
as required to monitor and adapt to 
legislative changes or challenges. 

The Group maintains a premium listing 
on the London Stock Exchange and is 
subject to high standards of corporate 
governance, including the UK Corporate 
Governance Code and UK Market Abuse 
Regulation. Ferrexpo has a relationship 
agreement in place with Kostyantin 
Zhevago, which stipulates that the 
majority of the Board of Directors must 
be independent of Mr Zhevago and his 
associates. For all related party transactions, 
appropriate procedures, systems and 
controls are in place and adhered to. 

Ferrexpo prioritises a strong internal control 
framework including high standards of 
compliance and ethics. The Group operates 
a centralised compliance structure that 
is supported and resourced locally at 
the Group’s operations. Ferrexpo has 
implemented policies and procedures 
throughout the Group including regular 
training. Ferrexpo prioritises sufficient total 
liquidity levels and strong credit metrics 
to ensure smooth operations should 
geopolitical or economic weakness disrupt 
the financial system of Ukraine. Ferrexpo 
looks to maintain a talented workforce 
through skills training and competitive 
wages, taking into account movements 
of the Ukrainian hryvnia against the 
US dollar and local inflation levels. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

79

1. Country risk (continued)

1.3. Counterparty risk (external risk)

Responsibility
Board of Directors including Executive Chair

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
4

Risk mitigation

In terms of supplier governance, the 
Compliance team conducts regular checks 
on all suppliers, screening entities for a 
number of risks and elevating those deemed 
to be higher risk for further consideration by 
FRMC Committee as to their eligibility. For 
entities that the Group conducts business 
with, the Group has developed a Code of 
Conduct for Suppliers, which as of 2023 
is referenced in 90% of all contracts equal 
to approximately 2,000 due diligence 
checks completed on potential third parties 
(2022: 90% and 1,300 checks).The Group’s 
exposure to the failure of a counterparty, or 
the failure of a party to provide its contracted 
goods and services, is managed through the 
Group engaging with a range of suppliers, 
where possible, in addition to sufficient 
cash reserves to maintain the Group’s 
overall liquidity. Where it is not possible or 
practical to source goods and services from 
multiple providers, the Group considers 
alternative goods and services to meet its 
needs and to reduce single party risk.

With regard to the structures in place to 
monitor and manage counterparty risk, the 
Finance, Risk Management and Compliance 
(“FRMC”) Committee, is an executive 
sub-committee of the Board charged with 
ensuring that systems and procedures 
are in place for the Group to comply with 
laws, regulations and ethical standards. 

The FRMC Committee met ten times in 2023 
(2022: ten) and is attended by the Group 
Compliance Officer and, as necessary, 
by the local compliance officers from the 
operations, who present regular reports and 
ensure that the FRMC Committee is given 
prior warning of regulatory changes and 
their implications for the Group. The FRMC 
Committee enquires into the ownership of 
potential suppliers deemed to be “high risk”, 
and oversees the management of conflicts 
of interests below Board level and general 
compliance activities (including under the 
UK Bribery Act 2010, the Modern Slavery 
Act, the Criminal Finances Act, and the 
EU General Data Protection Regulation).

The Group aims to minimise risk around 
the timely provision of goods and 
services through maintaining sufficient 
cash reserves and liquidity, as well 
as maintaining alternative suppliers 
should one counterparty fail. 

The Board aims to ensure adherence 
to the highest standards of diligence, 
oversight, governance and reporting with all 
charitable donations, with the Health, Safety, 
Environment and Community (“HSEC”) 
Committee required to provide approval 
for community support expenditures.

As a business operating in a lower middle 
income economy, and also as a business 
operating in a country that is currently 
engaged in an armed conflict, there are 
significant risks in respect of the Group’s 
business interactions with third party suppliers 
of goods and services. Risks may relate to a 
number of subject areas, including (but not 
limited to) governance and corruption risks, 
risk of collapse, risks relating to monopolies 
and situations whereby alternative suppliers 
may not be available, and counterparty risks 
relating to the conflict in Ukraine whereby 
counterparties may be exposed to Russia 
(with such relationships potentially not 
being known to the Group). The full-scale 
Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has 
imposed a significant strain on the economy 
of Ukraine and has therefore heightened 
the counterparty risks facing the Group.

A secondary effect of the ongoing war in 
Ukraine is that the Group may be affected in 
its ability to conduct effective due diligence 
on counterparties given the imposition 
of martial law in Ukraine, and other war-
related restrictions. The Group has had 
to change a number of key suppliers in 
since February 2022, and in doing so, 
has had to conduct due diligence checks 
as part of each new relationship, which 
carries inherent risk to the Group.

Counterparty risks may result in direct 
consequences for the Group such as 
financial harm and operational issues in 
sourcing material, and also include indirect 
consequences such as damage to the 
Group’s reputation either within Ukraine 
or with international stakeholders, such 
as investors, lenders and customers.

Additionally, as outlined on page 76 (Ukraine 
Country Risk), recent events relating to the 
controlling shareholder of the Group have 
resulted in secondary effects on a number 
of business relationships of the Group. 
The Group is currently managing these 
risks either through existing relationships 
or through new relationships, and it should 
be noted that any new (or change of 
existing) business relationship carries an 
inherent counterparty risk to the Group.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS80

Principal Risks continued

2. Market related risks

2. Risks relating to the global demand for steel

Responsibility
Board of Directors  
including Executive Chair

Risk appetite
Medium

Link to strategy
3 and 5

Risk mitigation

Under normal circumstances, the Group 
has the ability to mitigate risks around 
demand for steel through its global 
customer base, with the Group having 
the ability to geographically arbitrage 
its products. During 2023, the Group 
had no access to Ukrainian Black Sea 
ports, resulting in a shift to European 
customers accessible by rail. When the 
Group has been able to access alternative 
Black Sea ports, the size of shipments 
have been lower at higher costs.

Other risk mitigation activities include 
the Group’s ability to produce high 
quality forms of iron ore, which typically 
command higher premiums with 
customers and also tend to be more in 
demand throughout the economic cycle. 

Ferrexpo operates in a country whereby 
the local currency, the Ukrainian hryvnia, 
is a currency which is correlated to the 
performance of commodity prices, and 
historically the Group has experienced 
depreciation in the hryvnia at times of lower 
commodity prices, which in turn reduces 
the Group’s dollar-denominated cost base. 
Movements in the hryvnia-dollar exchange 
rate can, however, be influenced by other 
factors and may not necessarily reduce 
costs at times of low iron ore prices.

The Group is a part of the global steel 
value chain, which is a sector that is 
heavily reliant on global connectivity, and 
global factors that affect the supply and 
demand balance of both steel and the 
raw materials required for making steel. 

Steel is typically made using processes 
that involve iron ore, a portion of scrap steel 
(depending on the process method) and 
energy (which can include coal, natural gas 
and electricity). Prices for these key inputs 
can be volatile, and are factors that will move 
independently of any single steel producer’s 
control, and will therefore have the ability to 
significantly affect the profitability of individual 
steel producers. Additional factors governing 
the input costs, and therefore profitability, 
of steelmakers include: the availability and 
cost of labour, requirements for capital 
investments to sustain or grow output, the 
availability of raw materials and energy (in 
addition to unit costs), the cost and availability 
of logistics routes and the presence of 
lower cost competitors in key markets.

Global steel demand varies considerably 
and can be significantly influenced by factors 
outside of the control of a steel producer, 
such as political instability (e.g. the war 
in Ukraine), global energy prices, and the 
macro outlook for the global economy. 
In addition to these macro-economic 
environment factors, individual steel producing 
facilities and regions may be affected by 
national, regional and local factors such 
as political instability, political intervention, 
weather events, cybersecurity events, and 
climate change, amongst other factors.

Given that the factors listed here have the 
potential to materially affect the profitability 
of steel mills, individual companies and 
facilities may respond to cyclically higher 
costs or weaker market conditions by 
reducing or halting steel production, until 
more favourable market conditions resume. 
This in turn could have a material effect on 
suppliers to such businesses, including 
iron ore producers such as Ferrexpo.

A more recent trend has seen a surge in 
awareness of climate change related issues, 
which is driving increased changes within 
various levels of the operating environment 
for steel companies – from local and regional 
government enacting legislation related to 
climate change, to customers and local 
communities demanding that steel production 
involve lower emissions. Efforts to counter the 
effects of climate change in the steel industry, 
which typically focus on the reduction of 
carbon emissions in the production of steel, 
could generate higher operating costs in 
the near term, and higher requirements for 
capital investment over the medium to long 
term. Whilst operating costs for steelmakers 
could increase in the near term as a result 
of emissions reduction measures, end 
users of steel may not agree to higher steel 
prices, and therefore profit margins could 
decrease until such costs are lowered or 
successfully passed through to end users.

The structure of the global steel industry 
relies on a consistent supply of materials 
to steel mills and a consistent offtake of 
finished steel by customers. As a consumer 
of bulk commodities, such as iron ore and 
coal, the timely and reliable delivery of 
these materials is required for stable steel 
prices, since any disruption in the delivery 
process can create short and medium-term 
spikes in steel prices. Equally, a scenario 
whereby global markets encounter an 
excessive supply of steel, either through an 
unforeseen downturn in end-user demand, 
or disruptive increases in steel supply, could 
have a negative effect on steel prices.

Global steel markets also rely on the consistent 
availability of logistics pathways, and events 
such as the ongoing attacks on shipping in 
the Red Sea since October 2023, serve to 
demonstrate the possibility of short-term 
pricing fluctuations in shipping freight rates 
(both positive and negative) when global 
logistics chains are not functioning optimally.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

81

3. Risks related to realised pricing

3.1. Changes in pricing methodology (external risk)

Responsibility
Executive Chair and  
Chief Marketing Officer

Risk appetite
Medium

Link to strategy
1, 3 and 5

Risk mitigation

The Group aims to price its products 
through clear and consistent engagement 
with customers, with the Group seeking 
to develop mutually beneficial long-term 
relationships. Through consistent supply 
and consistent high quality of the Group’s 
products, Ferrexpo aims to maintain 
strong relationships with its customers. 

Through strong customer relationships, the 
Group aims to ensure that the net realised 
prices received for its iron ore products are 
in line with the international benchmarks 
for pricing of similar products, in addition 
to premiums paid for the quality and 
specification of the product being sold. 

Ferrexpo endeavours to achieve the 
prevailing market price at all times, 
and the Group aims to be a low cost 
producer and therefore cash flow positive 
throughout the commodities cycle. 

Pricing formulas for iron ore pellets are 
governed by multiple factors, including the 
iron ore fines prices, a premium for additional 
ferrum content, pellet premiums, freight rates 
and additional quality premiums and discounts 
depending on the type of iron ore pellet or 
concentrate supplied and its chemistry.

Industry-wide factors, which are outside 
of the Group’s control, can influence the 
methodology for pricing iron ore products, 
in addition to the various premiums and 
discounts that are applied by individual 
customers and regions. Premiums or 
discounts paid for specific characteristics 
may change and adversely affect the 
Group’s ability to market specific products.

Should the standard industry pricing 
methodology change in the future, it could 
have a positive or negative impact on 
the Group in the form of realised prices 
for iron ore pellets and concentrates, 
and therefore affect the Group’s financial 
performance. Additional potential impacts 
of changing perceptions around pricing 
methodology could include a restriction in 
the Group’s ability to sell its products to 
specific customers and geographic regions, 
should such stakeholders elect to pursue 
a different pricing methodology with an 
alternative of iron ore products suppliers.

As a producer of high grade forms of iron 
ore (grading 65% Fe and above), over time, 
the Group has developed customer pricing 
agreements with customers on the basis of 
high grade benchmark fines indices (grading 
65% Fe). Such agreements enable the Group 
to realise the value of the iron content in its 
products, with high grade (65% Fe) fines 

index trading an average of US$12 per tonne 
above the medium grade (62% Fe) in 2023 
(2022: US$19 per tonne)1. The premiums 
paid for material priced using the high grade 
benchmark index reflect the more restricted 
supply of higher grade iron ores into the 
global market, with the majority of supply 
being either low or medium grade iron ores. 
Premiums paid for higher grade iron ores 
(referred to as the “ferrum premium”) also 
reflect the operational benefits to steel mills 
through higher blast furnace productivity 
and lower emissions profiles associated 
with higher grade input materials.

The Group also relies on pricing structures for 
its pellets to include a pellet premium, which 
reflects the high quality, pelletised nature of 
the iron ore delivered to customers. Given 
the benefits of pellets to steelmakers (namely 
improved furnace productivity and lower 
greenhouse gas emissions), it is accepted 
practice that steelmakers pay an additional 
premium for iron ore pellets (referred to as the 
“pellet premium”). Pellet premiums have varied 
significantly in recent years, which reflects both 
supply and demand-related factors. Given 
the scale of the pellet premium relative to 
the iron ore fines index and pelletising costs, 
significant shifts in pellet premiums would have 
a significant impact on profitability and product 
differentiation. A number of pellet premiums 
are quoted by third parties, which are 
computed in a variety of ways. Any switch from 
using one specified pellet premium to another 
quoted pellet premium, could also result in a 
difference in realised pricing for the Group.

1.  Bloomberg

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS82

Principal Risks continued

3. Risks related to realised pricing (continued)

3.2. Iron ore prices (external risk)

Responsibility
This risk cannot be controlled 
however it is monitored

Risk appetite
Medium

Link to strategy
1, 3 and 5

This factor is one that is connected to risks 
related to the global demand for steel (see 
page 80), since demand for steel directly 
impacts the pricing of raw materials used 
to produce steel, such as iron ore.

As a company that derives the majority 
of its revenues from iron ore products, 
Ferrexpo is inherently exposed to iron ore 
prices, either in the form of benchmark 
iron ore fines prices, or pellet premiums. 
Variations in iron ore prices come in a 
number of forms, from the underlying iron 
ore price, the ferrum and pellet premium in 
addition to discounts and premiums applied 
for the naturally occurring trace elements 
in ores such as silica and alumina.

The iron ore fines price is the largest 
component of pricing for the Group’s 
products, which averaged US$132 per 
tonne in 2023 (65%Fe1, 2022: US$139 per 
tonne). As discussed in the Market Review 
section (see page 22, iron ore fines prices are 
predominantly affected by Chinese demand, 
which is the largest import market globally.

The quoted price for iron ore fines is called 
the benchmark index, and is applicable 
for forms of iron ore that have a specified 
chemistry that is amenable for steelmaking, 
such as the percentage of each trace 
element contained (e.g. silica, alumina 
and phosphorus). The Group’s products 
typically conform to the requirements of the 
benchmark index, and therefore tend not to 
have penalties applied. Iron ores that do not 
comply with the benchmark index, however, 
will be subject to a range of penalties, 
which may vary significantly depending on 
a range of market factors and technical 
requirements of each steel mill. Any variation 
in the quality and chemistry of the Group’s 
iron ore that is sold in any given period could 
therefore result in penalties being incurred.

A secondary component of the pricing 
structure of the Group’s products is the pellet 
premium, which is applied to the sale of iron 
ore pellets. This premium is significant to the 
Group, and historically can represent up to 
an additional 50% on top of the benchmark 
iron ore fines index. This component of the 
pricing structure of the Group’s products 
is discussed in detail on page 23.

1.  Source: S&P Global Commodity Insights.

Should reputational issues concerning the 
Group and its UBO affect existing or potential 
relationships in steelmaking regions that 
demand Ferrexpo’s high-grade product 
offerings, the Group may no longer be 
able to realise the same level of product 
pricing as previously experienced.

The Group aims to mitigate price risk through 
producing high grade, low impurity iron ore 
products, which receive premiums when 
sold to customers, rather than penalties 
or discounts. Through such products, the 
Group has been able to build a higher-margin 
business, which in turn enables further 
investment in the Group’s production facilities.

In addition, the Group aims to be a low 
cost producer of iron ore products. 
Through operating with a lower cost base 
than the Group’s peers, particularly when 
the premiums paid for pellet quality and 
specification are considered, Ferrexpo aims 
to remain competitive on a global basis.

Ferrexpo’s operating costs are partly 
correlated with commodity prices. When 
the commodities cycle is in a downward 
phase, Ferrexpo typically receives a lower 
selling price, but the Group’s cost base 
also tends to decline as a result of local 
currency devaluation. The Ukrainian hryvnia 
is a commodity-related currency and has 
historically depreciated during periods of 
low commodity prices, although movements 
of the Ukrainian hryvnia against the US 
dollar can also be influenced by short-
term geo-political and other factors.

Ferrexpo regularly reviews its options in 
respect of hedging sales. The Group’s 
current strategy is to not enter into such 
hedging agreements due to the relatively 
low liquidity of this market and high 
costs involved. The Group will continue 
to review this strategy as the market for 
hedging iron ore pellets evolves, which may 
increase the attractiveness of hedging.

Risk mitigation

The Group aims to mitigate price risk 
through producing high grade, low 
impurity iron ore products, which receive 
premiums when sold to customers, 
rather than penalties and/or discounts. 
Through such products, the Group has 
been able to build a high-margin business, 
which in turn enables further investment 
in the Group’s production facilities.

In addition, the Group aims to be a low 
cost producer of iron ore products. 
Through operating with a lower cost base 
than the Group’s peers, particularly when 
the premiums paid for grade and form 
(pellets) are considered, Ferrexpo aims 
to remain competitive on a global basis.

Furthermore, Ferrexpo’s operating costs 
are partly correlated with commodity 
prices. When the commodities cycle is 
in a downward phase, Ferrexpo typically 
receives a lower selling price, but the 
Group’s cost base also tends to decline as 
a result of local currency devaluation. The 
Ukrainian hryvnia is a commodity-related 
currency and historically over the long-term 
it has depreciated during periods of low 
commodity prices, although movements 
of the Ukrainian hryvnia against the US 
dollar can also be influenced by short-term 
political factors, in addition to other factors.

Ferrexpo regularly reviews its options in 
respect of hedging the price of its output. 
The Group’s current strategy is to not 
enter into such hedging agreements 
due to the relatively low liquidity of this 
market and high cost of entering into such 
arrangements. The Group will continue 
to review this strategy as the market for 
hedging iron ore pellets develops over 
time, which may eventually reduce the 
effective cost of such arrangements.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

83

3. Risks related to realised pricing (continued)

3.3. Pellet premiums 

Responsibility
Executive Chair and  
Chief Marketing Officer

The pricing of the Group’s products includes a 
pellet premium. This references the pelletised 
nature of Ferrexpo’s products and the benefits 
they offer in the steel making process. 
Consequently iron ore pellets customers will 
pay a premium over and above the prevailing 
iron ore fines price. The pellet premium is 
one of the principal factors that enables 
the Group to generate higher-margins.

Factors governing the pellet premium in 
any given year include supply and demand 
for iron ore pellets. Demand factors can be 
related to the global macro-economy and 
steelmakers desire to optimise their production 
and productivity, which tends to result in 
demand from steelmakers. Pellet demand 
can also be affected by emissions reduction 
legislation. Iron ore pellets remove the need 
for sintering in steel making, a process that 
typically uses coal. Steelmakers that utilise a 
greater proportion of pellets in a blast furnace 
can therefore reduce the overall emissions 
footprint of steel production. See the section 
on Ferrexpo DR pellets in electric arc furnaces 
in this report for an example on pages 42.

The overall supply of iron ore pellets is relatively 
constrained, with existing producers typically 
producing at their nameplate capacity and 
the construction of new pelletiser capacity 
usually requiring significant capital investment 
to establish production facilities and the 
associated infrastructure required to support 
the production and transportation of bulk 
commodities to customers. Consequently, 
there has been limited new pelletising 
capacity come on line in the past five years.

Risk appetite
Medium

Link to strategy
1, 3 and 5

Supply-side disruption has been prominent 
factor in recent years, with the failure of two 
tailings dams in Brazil resulting in significant 
volatility in supply from two of the largest 
pellets exporters to the global steel industry. 
Both of the companies involved in these 
incidents have now resumed production 
from the affected production facilities, and 
therefore the market is absorbing the return 
of this production at increasing rates.

Should reputational concerns over the Group 
and its UBO affect existing or potential 
relationships, the Group may no longer 
be able to realise the same level of pellet 
premiums as previously experienced.

Risk mitigation

Despite being one of the largest iron 
ore pellet exporters, the Group’s market 
share is not sufficient to be a price setter. 
Consequently, therefore the Group 
realised pellet premiums tend to follow the 
level set by larger market participants.

To mitigate this, the Group’s strategy is 
to be a low cost producer. Historically, 
the Group has operated as one of the 
lower costs pelletising operators, and 
therefore swing producers have tended 
to moderate the pellet premium at times 
of low pricing by withdrawing from the 
market supporting a floor in prices due 
to a tightening in supply. The Group 
has had to operate below its nameplate 
capacity during 2023 due to the ongoing 
war in Ukraine. As such, pelletising costs 
marginally increased to US$30 per tonne 
in 2023 (2022: US$29 per tonne). Despite 
this increase, the Group has managed 
to keep pelletising costs below the 
prevailing pellet premium for the year.

The strategy of targeting low cost 
production is enhanced through Ferrexpo’s 
location in Ukraine, with the Ukrainian 
hryvnia having a close correlation to 
commodity pricing, which therefore tends 
to devalue at times of low commodity 
pricing, reducing the Group’s cost base.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS84

Principal Risks continued

3. Risks related to realised pricing (continued)

3.4.  Seaborne freight rates (external risk)

Responsibility
Executive Chair and  
Chief Marketing Officer

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
2, 3 and 5

Further freight-related realised effects, or 
potential risks, of the war in Ukraine include 
an increase in the insurance premiums 
required for vessels travelling to Black Sea 
ports (Ukrainian ports or otherwise), and the 
delayed loading and unloading times which 
can result in increased demurrage costs. 

The Group is also aware of potential risks 
that relate to recent events with the Group’s 
UBO (see pages 76 to 78), which may affect 
Ferrexpo’s ability to conduct business 
relationships with freight providers. Should 
third party concerns relating to these 
matters prevent Ferrexpo from engaging in 
business relationships with specific freight 
providers, then the Group may incur higher 
freight rates and a smaller pool of ship 
owners prepared to work with the Group.

The pricing of a bulk commodity, such 
as Ferrexpo’s iron ore products, typically 
includes a component of the net realised 
pricing that considers the cost of transporting 
material to the customer. For Ferrexpo, this 
pricing typically refers to either the C3 or 
C2 freight indices (published by the Baltic 
Exchange), as these are reflective of the 
shipping cost for accessing either the Asian 
or European market (respectively). Freight 
rates are a deduction from the pricing 
received from the pellet, and therefore higher 
freight rates will result in lower net realised 
pricing for the Group, and vice versa. 

The factors driving freight rates include the 
prevailing fuel cost for ships, the availability of 
vessels at a given point in time, and insurance 
policies required for ships to service the 
required route (the latter being a significant 
factor for chartering parties looking to ship 
via the Black Sea during the present time). 

As a guide, the C3 freight index (representing 
a seaborne Brazil-China trade route on 
a capesize vessel) was US$24.99 per 
tonne at the end of 2023 compared to 
US$20.07 per tonne at the end of 20221.

Additionally, the war in Ukraine has had an 
impact on the Group’s ability to charter vessels 
with ship owners, as the limited availability 
of Ukrainian Black Sea ports has reduced 
the Group’s access to the seaborne market. 
Whilst the increased costs associated with 
trading within the Black Sea have been 
reflected in Black Sea freight rates since 
the outset of the war, the Group has on 
occasion chartered vessels from alternative 
Black Sea ports due to the Group’s strong 
relationships with ship owners. Only recently, 
since January 2024, the Group has resumed 
shipments from the Port Pivdenniy in Ukraine, 
while continuing to closely monitor the risk of 
access to the Black Sea ports in Ukraine.

Risk mitigation

The Group has its own in-house freight 
specialist, which helps the Group to 
receive a competitive rate for freight 
cargoes. The Group’s management team 
regularly visit and speak with ship owners 
around world and it is therefore possible to 
maintain a detailed understanding of both 
the global freight market and ship owners.

As a result of the Group’s operations 
being located in Ukraine, seaborne 
freight chartering has been reduced in 
2023 (following Russia’s closure of the 
Black Sea to Ukrainian ports), and as 
such the Group has increasingly relied 
on its European customer network for 
sales. Despite this, the international 
freight rate is still relevant for the 
business, as many contracts reference 
a quoted freight rate and the Group has 
maintained some seaborne sales.

The Group currently does not enter into 
hedging arrangements for freight rates, 
which is an approach consistent with 
the Group’s strategy on other forms of 
hedging. This approach is continually 
reviewed by the Group’s management 
team, and such arrangements may 
be entered into if it is deemed to 
be beneficial to the Group.

The Group’s freight department 
regularly monitors freight-related risks 
associated with the war in Ukraine, 
or otherwise, with an aim of ensuring 
effective decision making in light of 
changes to the operating landscape.

1.  Source: Baltic Index / S&P Global

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

85

4. Operating risks

4.1. Risks relating to producing our products

Responsibility
Executive Chair, Chief Operating Officer 
and Chief Marketing Officer

Risk appetite
Medium

Link to strategy
2, 3 and 5

Risk mitigation

The Group employs an experienced 
management team and has a management 
structure in place to monitor, and where 
necessary, manage risks as and when 
these risks escalate. The Group’s business 
model is in a sector that has inherent risk 
in the mining and processing of materials, 
with these risks being manageable and, 
where possible, mitigation measures 
are utilised to ensure the safe operation 
of the Group’s facilities to ensure the 
efficient production of the Group’s iron 
ore products. The Group maintains a 
risk register of more than 40 risk areas, 
which is monitored on a frequent basis 
by the Group’s operational teams and 
reported to the relevant management 
committees. Where an operational risk 
is deemed to be sufficiently significant in 
terms of potential impact or likelihood, 
appropriate risk mitigation measures 
are sought, often with the assistance of 
third party specialists, where relevant.

Efforts aimed at maintaining equipment 
include ongoing repairs, keeping stocks 
of replacement parts and materials, and 
supporting contractors. To ensure stable 
energy supply, the Group cooperates 
with governmental organisations through 
joint projects to upgrade of the energy 
structure. The Group also has its own 
solar power plant capacity to meet 
its minimum power requirements.

To manage the availability of skills, 
the Group has expanded it’s 
recruitment and training programmes 
to attract and train more people. 

The Group’s operations involve the mining of 
iron ore, which requires detailed planning of 
blasting, excavation and haulage activities, 
to deliver sufficient quantities of iron ore in 
a timely manner to the Group’s processing 
plant, which crushes, grinds and beneficiates 
the material from in-situ iron ore grades 
(ranging approximately 25-30% Fe) to high 
grade concentrate (either 65% or 67% Fe) 
for Ferrexpo’s direct sale or pelletising. In 
the pelletising facilities, the concentrate is 
converted into pellets via a series of kilns, 
operating at approximately 1,300oC. The 
above processes are complex and carry 
inherent risks as a result. The Group is 
able to mitigate such risks through a range 
of activities and the collective experience 
of the Group’s executive management 
and operating teams, but it may not be 
possible to eliminate all risk factors.

As a business with its main operating assets 
located in Ukraine, the Group has faced 
significant risks relating to the ongoing war 
in Ukraine, which are summarised in the 
Principal Risks shown on page 73 of this 
report. The Group has also faced a number 
of indirect consequences of the war in its 
operations, such as a number of skilled 
personnel departing Ferrexpo’s operations 
to either serve in the Armed Forces of 
Ukraine or relocating away from the conflict, 
the Ukrainian authorities requiring the 
delivery of specific equipment for military 
use (typically light vehicles), interruptions in 
the availability of specific materials relevant 
for the conflict such as detonators, niter, 
fuel and restrictions on operating practices, 
such as scheduled blasting in the pits.

Outside of risks that directly relate to the war 
in Ukraine, the Group faces material risks 
relating to its mining operations that include 
(but are not limited to) health and safety-
related risks, the risk of a pit wall failure or 
fall of ground incident in the Group’s mines, 
equipment failure (either due to operator 
oversight, failures in maintenance practices 
or failure despite acceptable levels of 
maintenance), weather events preventing 
access to the Group’s operations, poor 
planning processes resulting in a lack of 
high grade iron ore for processing, or the 
failure of drilling to optimise face availability 

or identify the correct location of ore and 
waste material. Risks in the processing plant, 
covering the beneficiation and pelletisation of 
material, also include (but are not limited to) 
equipment failure and unscheduled equipment 
downtime, a lack of spare parts, a lack of 
key input materials, unsuitable equipment for 
processing of certain ore types, operating 
restrictions and extreme weather events (or 
other events potentially related to climate 
change) that may impact the ability to produce 
or store the Group’s products. As operations 
continue to be modernised, the Group also 
faces cybersecurity-related risks from cyber 
threats and other factors that may impair 
the Group’s ability to operate its electronic 
equipment – see page 89 for more details.

The risks described above are typically 
short-term events and the Group also faces 
longer-term risks, such as climate change 
(see page 90) and country risks related to 
Ukraine (see page 76). Potential risks related to 
climate change are also detailed on pages 48 
to 59 of this report, and have been identified 
through the Group’s recent collaboration with 
environmental consultants Ricardo Plc. 

The Group is also aware of potential risks 
that relate to recent events with the Group’s 
UBO (see pages 76 to 78), which may affect 
Ferrexpo’s ability to source key input materials 
and labour either within Ukraine or overseas. 
Should third party concerns relating to these 
matters prevent Ferrexpo from engaging 
in business relationships with specific 
providers of materials and labour, then the 
Group may have challenges in its ability to 
produce, or incur higher costs relating to the 
sourcing of the same inputs from a smaller 
group of providers or group of people.

Despite the current limitations, the Group 
continues to maintain production and retains 
the ability to increase production depending 
on logistics availability. The availability of 
skills however, is becoming more challenging 
due to conscription and emigration.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS86

Principal Risks continued

4. Operating risks (continued)

4.2. Risks relating to delivering our products to customers

Responsibility
Executive Chair, Chief Operating Officer 
and Chief Marketing Officer

Risk appetite
Medium

Link to strategy
2, 3 and 5

The Group is a producer of a bulk commodity, 
meaning that its business model relies on 
timely and consistent access to a logistics 
network with sufficient capacity to transfer 
a large volume of material to the Group’s 
customer base around the world. Any 
interruption to the scale, availability or reliability 
of this logistics network has the potential 
to significantly affect the Group’s ability to 
operate its business model and generate 
cash flow. The nature of being a producer 
of a bulk commodity means that should an 
interruption of logistics occur, there may be 
limited time or sufficient funding available to 
efficiently remedy the situation or stockpile 
excess material, potentially resulting in 
a temporary suspension of the Group’s 
production facilities and an associated effect 
on the Group’s ability to generate revenues 
and maintain a strong balance sheet. 

The Group’s logistics network is multi-
nodal, including the Group’s use of the 
railway network in Ukraine and further 
afield across Europe, a stake in a berth 
at a port facility in south west Ukraine 
(used for loading vessels for the seaborne 
market), and an inland waterway logistics 
business along inland waterways. 

Examples of risks relating to the Group’s 
logistics network, aside from those specifically 
relating to the ongoing Russian invasion of 
Ukraine (covered on pages 76 to 78), range 
from those potentially affecting railway 
logistics, which include (but are not limited 
to) the unexpected closure or suspension of 
sections of the railway network in Ukraine or 
Europe required for deliveries, a reduction 
in rail capacity related to the phasing out 
of outdated equipment and insufficient 
investment in replacement equipment, 
potential political interference in the Group’s 
ability to book railway access and wagons 

(including the restriction on the use of one 
type of FPM’s rail cars noted in Note 30). 
Extreme weather events (either related to 
climate change or otherwise) and a lack of 
personnel to operate rail locomotives and 
infrastructure effectively. The Group faces 
similar risks relating to its use of inland 
waterway logistics, including on the River 
Danube, and in addition includes risks relating 
to abnormally high and low water levels, 
which may impede passage of vessels. Such 
risks are expected to be exacerbated in 
the future by the potential impact of climate 
change. Similar risks are posed to the Group 
and its ability to access seaborne markets 
should extreme weather events (either 
climate change related or otherwise) affect 
operations at the Port of Pivdennyi or other 
ports used by the Group, or shipping routes 
such as the Suez Canal and Red Sea.

The Group is also aware of potential risks 
that relate to recent events with the Group’s 
UBO (see page 76 to 78), which may affect 
Ferrexpo’s ability to secure bookings on 
key logistics routes either within Ukraine or 
overseas. Should third party concerns relating 
to these matters prevent Ferrexpo from 
engaging in business relationships with specific 
logistics providers, then the Group may incur 
difficulties in its ability to ship products, or 
may incur higher costs relating to the sourcing 
of logistics options along alternative routes.

It should be noted that during 2023 the 
Group benefited from more stable rail 
transportation within Ukraine. Also, the Group 
operated from its own pellet transshipment 
site on the Ukrainian border, in addition 
to various warehouses in Ukraine and 
in other countries to endure the stable 
supply of its goods to its customers.

Risk mitigation

Since listing in 2007, the Group has sought 
to invest in its logistics capabilities and 
overall capacity, to ensure cost effective 
and sufficient access to a logistics 
network. This has involved the purchase 
of railcars, including a fleet of over 3,000 
wagons, which helps ensure availability, 
despite the freeze of part of own wagons 
(as disclosed in Note 30),, reduce 
operating costs and ensure product quality 
whilst pellets are in transit to customers. 
Similarly, the Group owns a 49.9% stake 
in a berth at the Port of Pivdennyi in south 
west Ukraine, along with a trans-shipment 
vessel (“Iron Destiny”), which permits the 
Group to load trans-shipment vessels for 
the seaborne market. Iron Destiny was 
outside of Ukrainian waters undergoing 
routine maintenance at the time of Russia’s 
invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, 
ensuring safe ownership. The Group also 
owns its inland waterway logistics provider 
(First-DDSG), which is based in Vienna, 
Austria, and has locations along the River 
Danube and other inland waterways.

To maintain timely access to its logistics 
network, the Group maintains close 
working relationships with logistics 
providers and related parties that are key 
players in the Group’s logistics operations.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

87

4. Operating risks (continued)

4.3. Risks relating to health and safety

Responsibility
Executive Chair, Chief Operating Officer 
and Chief Human Resources Officer 

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

Effective management of health and 
safety related risks is important due to 
the inherent risks involved in the nature 
of mining and processing operations. 
The processes involved in the mining 
and processing of metalliferous rock has 
progressed significantly in recent years, 
but risks remain if policies and procedures 
are not followed correctly, or if equipment 
is not maintained and used correctly. 

Mining activities involve the use of large 
scale heavy equipment, such as haul trucks, 
excavators and bulldozers, with each item 
of equipment weighing a considerable 
number of tonnes and which are expected 
to regularly move around to a number of 
locations throughout a shift. The operation 
of mining equipment is inherently dangerous 
if operators are not correctly trained, or 
if due care and attention are not applied 
when operating each item of equipment. 
Activities within a mine include the drilling and 
blasting of rock, excavation and transport of 
ore to either the processing plant or waste 
dumps, watering of surfaces to reduce dust 
emissions and the construction of waste 
dumps to a specified design. Activities are 
typically conducted 24 hours a day, at which 
during certain time, poor weather and low 
light conditions are a risk for operators, 
even though the Group has extensive 
lighting on equipment during dark hours.

Risk mitigation

The Group’s approach to mitigating safety 
risks is to understand the causal factors 
of safety incidents, through creating 
risk registers for each activity being 
undertaken or area within the Group’s 
main operations. The Group also records 
leading indicators of safety, with an aim 
to monitor and improve these factors, to 
reduce the risk of a safety-related incident 
occurring. Examples of leading indicators 
include the number of training courses 
undertaken, high visibility safety tours by 
senior managers, safety inspections and 
hazard reports completed. In the instance 
of a safety-related event occurring, the 
Group aims to learn from each event, to 
reduce the risk of a repeat occurrence. 
Lagging indicators of safety help the 
Group’s management team to record 
the effectiveness of safety measures 
being implemented, and the main 
indicators used to track performance are 
the Group’s lost time injury frequency 
rate (“LTIFR”), total recordable injury 
frequency rate and fatalities.

Throughout its operations, the Group 
is seeking to implement modern 
forms of technology, including 
autonomous equipment, which 
help to remove operators from 
hazardous working environments.

1.  Source: Reuters, link. (Accessed 23 February 2024)
2.  Source: Reuters, link. (Accessed 23 February 2024)

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS88

Principal Risks continued

4. Operating risks (continued)

4.4. Risks relating to operating costs

Responsibility
Executive Chair and  
Chief Financial Officer

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
2 and 5

The use of natural gas is a key component of 
the Group’s pelletising operations and its use 
is therefore essential for the production of iron 
ore pellets.

The Group is also aware of potential risks that 
relate to recent events with the Group’s UBO 
(see pages 76 to 78), which may affect 
Ferrexpo’s ability to source key input materials 
and labour either within Ukraine or overseas. 
Should third party concerns relating to these 
matters prevent Ferrexpo from engaging in 
business relationships with specific providers 
of materials and skills, then the Group may 
incur difficulties in its ability to produce, or 
incur higher costs relating to the sourcing of 
the same inputs from a smaller group of 
providers or people.

The Group benefits open access to the 
energy market, allowing it to obtain energy 
resources at market prices. Additionally, the 
cost of production is supported by the 
depreciation of the national currency and 
long-term relationships with suppliers of key 
standardised materials. 

Risk mitigation

The Group has operated through a 
number of commodity cycles and the 
Group’s operations have been in 
production for over 50 years, and through 
this experience of operating, the Group’s 
management team has developed an 
understanding of cost effective production 
and the required level of goods and 
services to optimise the Group’s 
profitability at any given level of 
production.

The Group has a number of measures in 
place to reduce and minimise operating 
costs, where possible, to maintain 
profitability throughout any given 
commodity cycle. For input goods that 
are a requirement of the production of 
pellets, the Group aims to minimise use 
and develop substitutes for use in the 
Group’s operations, which may help 
reduce reliance on a single input (or 
limited number of inputs), and thereby 
reduce risks relating to the cost and 
supply of individual inputs. As an 
example, a partial substitute would be the 
use of sunflower husks in the Group’s 
pelletiser, which is used to fuel the 
pelletiser. In 2023, the Group successfully 
sourced 32% of the pelletiser’s heating 
energy from sunflower husks (2022: 21%). 
Other examples of substitution of goods 
within the Group’s operations include the 
use of different manufacturers of mining 
equipment, with different suppliers of 
spare parts, which reduces operational 
risks and can reduce operational costs.

The Group’s business comprises a number of 
open-pit mining operations, an iron ore 
processing complex and a range of ancillary 
activities that support the safe production of 
the Company’s products, which requires a 
range of input goods and services. The 
Group’s costs are subject to a range of 
factors, some of which are controlled by the 
Group, whilst others are outside of the 
Group’s control, meaning that resulting 
profitability may fluctuate. 

The Group operates in an energy intensive 
industry, and therefore requires a range of 
commodity-based inputs such as diesel and 
natural gas, as well as electricity, which are 
subject to market factors outside of 
Ferrexpo’s control and can influence the 
Group’s overall profitability. Examples include 
natural gas prices which increased 
significantly during 2022, though have abated 
in 2023.

Further to energy costs, inflationary pressures 
continued to be absorbed during 2023. Cost 
inflation has the potential to affect a wide 
range of the Group’s input costs at its 
operations, with the Group potentially not able 
to effectively counter such pressures due to 
the benchmark pricing of the Group’s 
products. 

A primary cause of cost inflation has been the 
Group’s inability to operate at its nameplate 
capacity due to the war in Ukraine, resulting 
in the absorption of fixed cost on lower 
production, i.e. increasing unit costs. 
Additionally, inflationary pressures have been 
seen on a global basis since 2022, a reflection 
in energy prices, though in turn equipment 
and maintenance costs, salaries and wages. 
Consumer price inflation in Ukraine in 2023 is 
estimated to have slowed to 12.9%1 (2022: 
26.6%2), reflecting the exceptional 
circumstances experienced since 2022 in 
Ukraine, but also globally. Given that the 
Russian invasion of Ukraine remains ongoing, 
it is expected that the negative impacts of the 
war will continue to be experienced by the 
Group, such as lower production and higher 
unit costs.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

89

4. Operating risks (continued)

4.5. Risks relating to information technology (“IT”) 
systems and cybersecurity

Responsibility
Executive Chair

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
1, 2 and 3

The Group is increasingly adapting to modern 
technologies for the safe, efficient and cost 
effective production of its products and the 
associated ancillary services. With IT systems 
becoming increasingly important to the 
Group’s business activities, the risks 
associated with IT security and the continued 
availability of IT systems have increased in 
recent years, particularly in light of the 
increased complexity of cyberattacks on IT 
systems. Cybersecurity threats may take the 
form of, but are not limited to malware, 
ransomware, phishing, denial-of-service 
attacks, and password attacks.

Cyberattacks, such as malware and 
ransomware, are often unreported in the 
mainstream media by companies and 
governments wishing to avoid negative 
publicity. It is therefore difficult to ascertain 
the full extent to which the Group is facing 
cybersecurity risks. In the past, published 
cyberattacks affecting companies and 
governments have closed or limited a 
company’s ability to produce, or have 
withheld or disclosed confidential information, 
and have withheld access to key operational 
infrastructure.

A consequence of the war is a shortage of IT 
personnel due to conscription. The availability 
of skilled IT people is becoming a challenge in 
Ukraine and replacing people can take longer 
than before the war.

The Group is exposed to heightened risks 
related to cybersecurity at the present. The 
war takes place in a number of environments, 
including attacks on IT systems in Ukraine. 
Attacks can be expected on any IT system in 
Ukraine as a result of the war, and therefore, 
organisations such as Ferrexpo may be the 
target of an attack due to its location, or as 
part of a hybrid war to damage the economy 
of Ukraine. Consequently, it is difficult for the 
Group to predict the source, scale or nature 
of any cyberattack.

Risk mitigation

The Group’s IT department conducts 
regular reviews of the general IT 
landscape and provides regular cyber 
awareness training for employees as well 
as ad hoc notification when new threats 
are identified. The Group also regularly 
reviews requirements on data protection, 
with email security bulletins circulated to 
ensure internal IT users are provided with 
up-to-date information on cybersecurity. 
The Group has also implemented a 
dynamic approach to anti-malware 
policies, to ensure an adaptive approach 
for new threats as they emerge. 

In 2023, the Group’s IT infrastructure was 
adapted to meet the needs of longer war. 
The Group invested resources and efforts 
in strengthening cross-backup 
infrastructure to meet updated Group 
disaster recovery policies. 

Following a series of cyberattacks on 
different corporate networks this year, the 
Group’s IT department initiated a project 
to upgrade the Group’s global network 
connectivity links and their underlying 
technology. As a result of these efforts, 
the Group was able to withstand a DoS 
attack this year with minimal disruption to 
its production and communication 
processes. Additionally, the IT department 
,together with the executive committee, 
constantly assess the need of ISO 2700x 
compliance audits on bi-quarterly or 
quarterly term. In parallel, the Group must 
respond to the possibility of cyberwarfare 
and conventional warfare tactics, for 
example by commissioning of additional 
IT infrastructure in bomb shelters. Other 
examples of vigilance include the 
deployment of extensive power control 
systems, and urgent upgrades and 
migrations due to vulnerabilities. 

Further to existing practices and 
protocols, the Group regularly updates 
the software and hardware in use 
throughout its business, to reduce the 
Group’s exposure to known weaknesses 
in cybersecurity.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS90

Principal Risks continued

5. Risks relating to climate change

Responsibility
Board of Directors including Executive Chair

Risk appetite
Low

Link to strategy
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

With regard to Scope 1 and 2 emissions, 
the Group has initiated a number of projects 
to reduce these categories of emissions, 
including a clean power purchasing strategy. 
Further information on the Group’s Scope 1, 
2 and 3 emissions can be found on pages 
36 to 37. The Group is continuing to study 
options to reduce diesel consumption 
by installing clean electricity powered 
pantograph-trolley-assist technology to 
haul trucks out of the open pit mines.

Through these projects, the Group stated 
objective was to produce iron ore pellets on 
a net zero basis by 2050. For further details 
of the net zero pathway identified through 
working with Ricardo Plc, as well as the 
Group’s carbon emissions reduction targets, 
please see the Group’s Climate Change 
Report for 2022 on the Group’s website here.

The Board and management team 
understand that further reductions in these 
emissions are possible in the coming 
years, however, due to a protracted war 
there is no certainty that these can be fully 
achieved. This means that the Board will 
need to assess its targets and possibly 
restate the Group’s Net Zero pathway.

Climate change represents a challenge for 
the modern world, with multiple stakeholders 
seeking to adapt to a low-emissions future. 

Climate change poses a number of physical 
and transition risks as the world seeks 
to reduce emissions and its reliance on 
technologies and activities that are relatively 
intensive for the emission of greenhouse 
gases. See Note 2 Basis of preparation for 
details on potential impact on the consolidated 
financial statements. Physical risks are those 
that affect the physical environment – such as 
increased heat events, prolonged droughts 
and low water levels, dust emissions, and 
the increased severity of precipitation 
events. Transition risks are those that relate 
to society’s shift to a low emissions future, 
such as reputational risks and the risk of 
technologies becoming redundant in a low-
emissions future.. A review of potential climate 
change related risks was conducted as part 
of the work carried out with environmental 
consultants Ricardo Plc in 2022, with this work 
detailed in the Group’s Climate Change Report. 
A materiality assessment as part of this work 
identified the following as the main risk areas 
facing Ferrexpo: (a) demand for low carbon 
emissions steelmaking, (b) shipping: targets 
and regulations on carbon emissions and (c) 
carbon pricing/tax: targets and regulations 
on carbon emissions. Further details of 
the work completed in collaboration with 
Ricardo Plc are available in Ferrexpo’s Climate 
Change Report on the Group’s website.

At this stage in the global development 
curve on climate change science and 
decarbonisation efforts, there is a 
heightened degree of stakeholder focus 
on decarbonisation efforts. Given this 
focus, there is an associated expectation of 
progress being made that may not match 
the availability of relevant technology and 
equipment, or the financial viability of any 
technology, and therefore there is a risk of 
rising stakeholder concern if a company’s 
decarbonisation plans and targets are not 
effectively communicated, or are deemed 
insufficient. Should stakeholders require 
further action or increased efforts for 
decarbonisation of a business, this may 
create additional financial, operational 
and reputational risks for the business.

Risk mitigation

The Group understands the importance of 
climate change, both in its impact on the 
business, as well as the Group’s potential 
impact on climate change. The Group 
aims to reduce its emissions over time and 
has set a series of reduction targets for 
its greenhouse gases (principally carbon 
dioxide) for the medium and long term 
(2030 and 2050, respectively). In December 
2022, the Group published its inaugural 
standalone Climate Change Report, which 
represents the first phase of work completed 
with environmental specialists Ricardo Plc. 
This report details a number of measures 
that the Group is either utilising today to 
reduce emissions, or plans to use in the 
future, in order to achieve these emissions 
targets. The full report is available on the 
Group’s website https://www.ferrexpo.
com/news-media/press-releases/2022/
publication-of-climate-change-report/).

The Group has a streamlined approach to 
reducing emissions, focusing where possible 
on activities that generate the greatest 
emissions, as well as identifying low cost 
solutions that may reduce the impacts of the 
Group’s activities. The main source of the 
Group’s overall emissions (being Scopes 
1, 2 and 3 collectively) is the downstream 
use of iron ore pellets in steelmaking, which 
accounted for 85% of total emissions in the 
Group’s baseline year of 2019. In order to 
reduce this aspect of emissions, one of the 
Group’s objectives is to increase its focus 
on production of direct reduction (“DR”) 
pellets, which are used in an alternative 
method of steelmaking (the direct reduced 
iron – electric arc furnace process), which 
results in DR pellets generating 37% 
lower emissions when converted to steel, 
compared to the Group’s blast furnace 
pellets, as assessed by Ricardo plc. More on 
this can be seen on page 42 in this report. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

91

Viability Statement

Review of planning process and outlook 

Assessing the Principal Risks to our business 
model and potential financial impact of an event 
occurring, protecting the equity value of our 
business for the benefit of all our stakeholders.

The Board monitors the Group’s risk 
management and internal control systems on 
an ongoing basis, and confirms that during the 
year it carried out a robust assessment of the 
principal and emerging risks facing the Group, 
their potential impact and the mitigating strategies 
in place, as described on pages 74 to 90.

Time horizon
The Board has reviewed the long-term prospects 
of the business, which remain aligned with 
Ferrexpo’s life of mine assumptions. For the 
purposes of assessing the Group’s viability, 
the Board has elected to look at the Ferrexpo 
business on a five year time horizon, with a 
particular focus on the short-term time horizon 
of 12 to 18 months, in light of the ongoing 
war in Ukraine and the material uncertainties 
operating in developing economy that this poses 
to the Group in terms of its going concern and 
viability. The Group has historically reviewed the 
viability of its business model over a five year 
time period given the long life nature of mining 
assets, including the period required to invest 
in such assets and taking into account the cash 
flows generated by those assets, as well as the 
cyclical nature of the commodities industry. As 
such, a five year time period was considered 
an appropriate length for the Board’s strategic 
planning period, with a heightened focus on 
additional risks in the coming 12 to 18 months.

Factors associated with 
the war in Ukraine 
Due to the significance, scale and unpredictable 
nature of the ongoing war in Ukraine, specific 
attention has been applied in the Group’s 
approach to assessing its viability. The war 
in Ukraine has represented, and will continue 
to represent, a significant risk to the Group’s 
ability to continue its operations in future 
periods. Since the full-scale Russian invasion 
of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, the Group has 
demonstrated a resilience that has enabled 
it to operate with a high degree of flexibility, 
and to adapt its operations to changing 
circumstances, albeit at lower capacity.

Emerging and existing risks related to the 
ongoing war are reported to the Executive 
Committee, available risk mitigation procedures 
are discussed, and the results are regularly 
reported to the Group’s Board of Directors. Risks 
that have been identified as a consequence of 
the war in Ukraine include risks to the health, 
safety and wellbeing of the Group’s workforce, 
the Group’s ability to operate its assets, including 
the availability of logistics capacity required 
for the delivery of the Group’s products to 
customers and the supply of key input materials 
required for the production process. For more 
information, please see the Principal Risks 
disclosed on pages 74 to 90 of this report.

Factors associated with operating 
in a developing economy
In addition to the war-related material uncertainty, 
the Group is also exposed to the risks associated 
with operating in a developing economy, which 
may or may not be exacerbated by the war or 
the current circumstances facing the Group’s 
controlling shareholder (see Ukraine country 
risk on pages 76 to 78). As a result, the Group 
is exposed to a number of risk areas that are 
heightened compared to those expected in a 
developed economy, including political, legal 
and fiscal uncertainties, which represent other 
material uncertainties at the time of the approval 
of the consolidated financial statements.

As disclosed in Note 30 Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes, several 
circumstances facing the Group have led to an 
escalation of certain risks, including risks relating 
to the political environment and the independence 
of the legal system, which could have a material 
negative impact on the Group’s business activity 
and reputation and as a result its viability. The 
main risks relate to a contested sureties claim in 
the amount of UAH4,727 million (US$124 million 
as at 31 December 2023), which was confirmed 
on 26 January 2024 by a Ukrainian court of 
appeal, and the application to open bankruptcy 
proceedings (“creditor protection proceedings”) 
against the Group’s major subsidiary in Ukraine 
filed by a supplier and related party to the 
Group for an amount of UAH4.6 million (US$117 
thousand as at 15 April 2024. The possible 
commencement of the enforcement of the 
decision of the Ukrainian court of appeal, which 
is currently suspended by the decision of the 
Supreme Court of Ukraine, and the possible 
opening of creditor protection proceedings 
might affect the Group’s ability to continue 
as a going concern and, as a consequence, 
its viability. See Note 2 Basis of preparation 
and Note 30 Commitments, contingencies 
and legal disputes to the consolidated 
financial statements for further information. 

Factors associated with 
climate change
The Group has considered a range of physical 
and transition risks, as outlined on page 45 of 
this report and depicted in detail in the Group’s 
Climate Change Report. This process has 
identified that the transition to a low carbon 
economy and demand for low emissions 
steelmaking as being the main climate-related 
risk facing Ferrexpo and its business model. 
A range of additional transition and physical 
risks were considered as part of this review. 

Previously, the Group has announced a range 
of climate-related emissions reduction targets 
for the years 2030 and 2050. In achieving these 
targets, so far a 32% reduction achieved since 
2019 for Scope 1 and 2 emissions (combined 
basis, per tonne of production). The Board 
understands that further reductions in these 
emissions are possible in the coming years, 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

however, due to a prolonged war there is no 
certainty that these can be fully achieved. This 
means that the Board will need to consider its 
targets and possibly restate the Group’s Net 
Zero pathway at some point in the future.

Business planning process
In response to the ongoing war in Ukraine, the 
Group has temporarily revised its approach 
to its business activities and investments 
from its business model shown on pages 8 
to 9. This approach has been implemented 
to concentrate on the Group’s ability to 
continue to generate cash in the challenging 
operating environment, which will enable the 
Group to employ its workforce, preserve its 
assets and sustain its business. As a result, 
investments are currently focused on settlement 
commitments related to expenditure on growth 
capital projects, affordable sustaining capital 
expenditure and modernisation of existing 
equipment and other development projects.

Prior to the beginning of the war, in order 
to maintain a clear strategic direction, the 
Group’s management team regularly assessed 
the risks faced by the Group against the 
ability of the Group to conduct business in 
accordance with its business model. 

This review is conducted regularly to maintain 
a clear understanding of the risks faced by the 
business and how these factors may influence 
the business. Following the start of the full-scale 
invasion of Ukraine, the Group’s management 
team has also focused on constantly assessing 
the risks that may directly, or indirectly, impair 
the Group’s ability to manage the Ferrexpo 
business in light of the impact of the war on the 
business and operating environment in Ukraine. 

Modelling process
In the normal course of business, the Group 
operates a detailed financial model of its 
business. Recently, this work stream has focused 
on the potential impacts arising from the ongoing 
war in Ukraine, in addition to the more traditional 
input factors such as the market factors that 
influence the price of the Group’s products, and 
operational factors that influence the Group’s 
ability to produce the required volume and quality 
of iron ore pellets demanded by the market, 
as determined in the Group’s forward-looking 
sales plan. As a result of the continued restricted 
access to the logistics network in Ukraine, the 
level of the Group’s production remains aligned 
to currently possible sales to minimise working 
capital outflow and maintain a solid net cash 
position. As a result, the production capacity 
used for the base-case cash flow projection 
is expected to be approximately 45% of the 
pre-war level for the financial year 2024, before 
an increase to approximately 80% in 2025 and 
an expected recovery to pre-war levels in 2026. 
In addition to the impact of the available logistics 
network, the Group’s management team has also 
assessed the risks associated with the potential 
disruption of the supply of key consumables, such 
as natural gas, electricity and diesel fuel, in addition 
to the supply of critical pieces of equipment. The 
Group has also considered external and internal 
analysis of the short-term and longer-term supply 

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS92

Viability Statement continued

and demand dynamics on the international market 
for iron ore products as well as more specific 
local supply and demand balances affecting its 
major customers to assess the expected pricing 
of the Group’s iron ore products for the period 
covered by the Group’s long term model. 

Stress testing
In determining the viability of the business, the 
Directors have stress tested the individual risks 
and combination of risks that could materially 
affect the future viability of the Ferrexpo business. 
At the present time, the risk that the Group 
is primarily exposed to is the ongoing war in 
Ukraine and current circumstances facing the 
Group’s controlling shareholder in Ukraine 
(see the Principal Risks section, pages 74 to 
90). Historically, Ferrexpo’s business model 
has also faced risks relating to the volatility 
of iron ore fines prices, pellet premiums and 
cost inflation in Ukraine, which are factors that 
continue to govern the Group’s profitability. 

As mentioned above, it is currently expected that 
the Group will only produce again at full capacity 
in 2026 which will be contingent on the ongoing 
war in Ukraine, its effects on the Group’s ability 
to operate its assets in Ukraine, and the ability 
to deliver its products to the Group’s customers. 
For a summary of the various war related impacts 
on the Group, please see pages 6 and 7.

The Group’s long-term financial model is adjusted 
to primarily reflect below full capacity production 
due to limited logistics access. The Group’s sales 
volumes in future periods will depend on the 
potential to expand seaborne sales to the Group’s 
customers beyond Europe. The Group’s financial 
model anticipates some optionality for seaborne 
sales when it is considered safe to do so.

Assuming no mitigating actions, the 
Group’s financial modelling indicates 
the following sensitivities:

–  A 10% reduction in the received price in 2024 
would reduce the Group’s Underlying EBITDA 
by US$11.0 per tonne.

–  A general 10% increase in the cost of 

production would decrease Group Underlying 
EBITDA by US$6.1 per tonne, 

–  A 10% decrease in production volumes and 
associated 5% increase in production costs, 
would decrease Underlying EBITDA by 
US$7.6 per tonne.

Sensitivities beyond 2024 will depend 
on the underlying sales and production 
volumes, realised prices and production 
costs during each period, in addition to 
other unknown macro-economic factors.

As a result of the remaining material uncertainty 
outside of the Group’s control, the Group has 
also prepared stress tests with more severe 
adverse changes, such as a combination of 
various sensitivities, which is however less 
likely to incur due to a natural hedge between 
iron prices and prices for key input material, 
and a prolonged period of lower production 
and sales volumes as seen during the months 
December 2022 to February 2023. The stress 
test for the most severe adverse changes, such 
as a combination of all reasonably possible 

or plausible adverse changes, shows that the 
Group would deplete its available cash balance 
by November 2024, without making use of any 
available mitigating actions within its control. It 
is however management’s position that such 
a combination is unlikely to happen as a result 
of the historical natural hedge between iron 
ore prices and prices for key input materials.

Following a negative decision from the court 
of appeal in respect of a contested sureties 
claim received, the Group recognised a full 
provision in the amount of UAH4,727 million 
(US$124 million as at 31 December 2023) for 
this claim. A potential future cash outflow, 
which also depends on the details of a possible 
enforcement in the event of a negative decision 
by the Supreme Court, is likely to have a 
significant impact on the Group’s future cash 
flow generation and available liquidity and its 
viability. See also Note 2 Basis of preparation 
and Note 30 Commitments, contingencies 
and legal disputes for further details.

In addition to stress testing associated with the 
ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the additional stress 
test scenarios performed include the following: 

–  Operational incidents that could have a 

significant impact on production volumes;
–  A deterioration in the Group’s long-term cost 
position on the industry cost curve; and
–  Operating constraints due to Ukrainian 

country risk.

In respect of mitigating actions in response to 
the conflict in Ukraine, please see page 75 for 
more detail. In more general areas, mitigating 
actions implemented by the Group may include, 
but are not limited to, a reduction or cancellation 
of discretionary expenditure such as dividends, 
non-essential capital investment and repairs 
and maintenance, or other operating costs, 
adjusting capital allocation, reducing working 
capital requirements, altering mining schedules 
and accessing additional funding. The Directors 
take comfort in both the Group’s historical 
cash generation ability, particularly in 2015 and 
2016 at a time when the iron ore price traded at 
historically low prices, and the Group’s ability to 
repay its debt facilities, with the early repayment 
of the Group’s principal debt facility in June 2021. 
This ability to repay debt facilities is derived from 
the operational flexibility of the Group and level 
of cash generation, as demonstrated through 
the Group’s ability to continued shipment of 
products in 2022, despite the war in Ukraine.

As a result of the Group’s flexibility and resilience, 
the Group’s net cash position increased by a 
relatively small amount during 2023. Since the 
end of 2020, the Group has moved into a net 
cash position, and had a net cash position of 
US$108 million as at 31 December 2023 (as of 
31 December 2022: US$106 million). As at the 
date of the approval of the Group’s Consolidated 
Financial Statements, the Group is in a net cash 
position of approximately US$91 million and 
has an available cash balance of approximately 
US$96 million. Based on the assessment 
performed, the Directors have a reasonable 
expectation that the Group will be able to 
continue to operate and meet its liabilities as they 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

fall due over the period of their assessment. This 
is, however, dependent on significant factors 
that are outside of the Group’s control, and the 
Directors have assumed the following when 
assessing the Group’s resilience to the potential 
threat from the war in Ukraine and its viability:

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

the continued ability to operate in Ukraine;
the ability to redesign the Group’s mining and 
processing plans in order to align them to 
changing circumstances;
the continued availability of stable electricity 
supply at the required level;
the ability to secure supplies of key 
consumables and equipment; and
the ability to use the Group’s currently 
available logistics network or make use of 
alternative options, if needed.

As disclosed in Note 2 Basis of preparation in 
the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements 
on page 176, although the Group has managed 
to continue its operations since the beginning 
of the war in a volatile and developing economy 
in Ukraine, this continues to pose a significant 
threat to the Group’s operations. The risks 
of operating in a dynamic and adverse legal 
system in Ukraine have been increased in 2023 
and early 2024 and, as a result, the Group 
recognised provisions totalling US$128 million 
for ongoing legal disputes that represent another 
material uncertainty resulting in its ability to 
continue as a going concern (see Note 30 
Commitments, contingencies and legal disputes 
to the Consolidated Financial Statements 
Having assessed the current situation of the 
war in Ukraine and increase of certain risks, 
including the political environment and the 
independence of the legal system in Ukraine, 
all identified available mitigating actions and the 
results of management’s assessment of the 
Group’s going concern and long-term viability, 
a material uncertainty still remains as some 
of the uncertainties are outside of the Group 
management’s control, such as the duration 
and the impact of the war and/or political, 
legal and fiscal environment in Ukraine, which 
is currently not predictable. An unfavourable 
outcome in a contested sureties claim and the 
application to open bankruptcy proceedings 
(“creditor protection proceedings”) against the 
Group’s major subsidiary in Ukraine filed by a 
supplier and related party to the Group might 
have an adverse impact on the Group’s cash 
flow generation, profitability and liquidity.

In performing this assessment, the Directors 
have also considered the Group’s resilience 
to climate change risks (covering a range 
of physical risks and transition risks).

The Strategic Report was approved 
by the Board on 17 April 2024 and 
signed on behalf of the Board by:

Lucio Genovese
Executive Chair

93

Corporate Governance

A strong core 
helps guide us

Governance 
at a Glance

Strategic Report 

Corporate Governance 

Executive Chair’s Introduction 
Governance at a Glance 
Board of Directors 
Executive Committee 
Corporate Governance Compliance 
Diversity 
Corporate Governance Report 
Audit Committee Report 
Nominations Committee Report 
Remuneration Report 
Directors’ Report 
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 

Financial Statements 

Additional Disclosures 
Alternative Performance Measures 
Glossary 

01

93

94
96
98
100
101
103
104
114
121
126
152
157

158

235
236
238

96

Committee 
Reports

114-151

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS94

Executive Chair’s Introduction

Committed to upholding high 
standards of corporate governance 
during exceptionally challenging times 
and delivering on our promises.

Lucio Genovese,
Executive Chair

Dear Shareholder
At the time of writing, the war in Ukraine 
has been ongoing for more than two years, 
and so before reflecting on the progress 
made during 2023, it is important to 
acknowledge the devastating impacts which 
the Russian invasion of Ukraine is having on 
Ukraine and the people, local communities, 
businesses operating within the country 
and the day-to-day lives of Ukrainians. 

Now more than ever strong governance is 
essential to help see Ferrexpo through these 
exceptionally challenging times. As you 
would expect, the Board has been meeting 
regularly to discuss the ongoing situation 
in Ukraine, receiving regular updates from 
the management team as to the Group’s 
response and scenario planning for different 
eventualities that may impact the business. 
Protecting the Group’s workforce remains a 
key priority, as well as taking steps to protect 
the business and thereby the stakeholders of 
the business. This will remain a key priority 
during 2024 and the Board will continue to 
focus on exercising strong governance during 
these unprecedented and difficult times.

I am pleased to present the Corporate 
Governance Report, which sets out an 
overview of the means by which the Company 
is directed and controlled, our governance 
structure, and highlights the governance 
activities of the Board and its principal 
committees during the course of the year.

The Board remains fully committed to 
maintaining good corporate governance 
practices throughout the Group which 
underpin all of its actions. The structure, 
policies and procedures we have adopted, 
which are described in this report, the 
Directors’ Report and reports from each of the 
Board Committees, reflect our commitment. 
We recognise the need to keep them under 
review and make changes where necessary 
to ensure that standards are maintained 
and reflect ever-evolving best practice. This 
report also explains how we have complied 
with the principles of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code during the year.

The Board’s role includes managing the 
risks facing the business. This includes 
taking into account the risks associated with 
the country of operation, counterparties, 
operational and financial risks including 
health, safety, environmental and climate 
change risks, together with market volatility 
and commodity pricing, financing and 
refinancing exposures. As new risks emerge 
our approach to evaluating risk appetite is 
reassessed. The Board’s role is also to support 
and challenge management and to ensure 
that the way we operate promotes the long-
term sustainable success of Ferrexpo plc.

Operation of the Board during the 
war in Ukraine and governance 
framework
Against the backdrop of the continuing war in 
Ukraine, we remained focused on the health, 
safety and wellbeing of our people globally, 
who have continued to deliver for the Group, 
our shareholders and stakeholders through the 
testing times over the last couple of years. Our 
people have helped ensure business continuity 
and have safeguarded our operations, whilst 
maintaining good corporate governance 
practices and our system of internal control.
During the year, the Board has continued to 
operate effectively and without disruption 
notwithstanding the ongoing challenges 
facing the Group. Some Board members 
attended Board meetings virtually due to 
travel restrictions. All scheduled Board 
meetings were held and the Board continued 
to uphold and maintain good corporate 
governance, the corporate agenda and the 
flow of information across the Group.

We have also ensured Directors’ on-boarding 
programmes continued as planned. The 
format of hybrid (combination of physical 
and virtual) Board meetings provided the 
Board with greater opportunities to engage 
with each other, management and members 
of the workforce. During 2023, the Board 
site visit to our operations in Horishni Plavni 
was cancelled due to the Russian invasion 
of Ukraine as was the case in the previous 
three years due to the Russian invasion of 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

95

Key highlights in 2023 and  
early 2024:
–  supporting our workforce and the 
operations throughout the Russian 
invasion of Ukraine;

–  health and safety and employee wellbeing;
–  zero fatalities;
–  continued with the search for a Director 

from an ethnic minority group;

–  appointment of interim Executive Chair;
–  appointment of Independent Non-

executive Director;

–  appointment of Executive Director;
–  appointment of Audit Committee Chair;
–  appointment of female Independent 

Non-executive Director to Chair HSEC 
Committee;

–  succession planning at Board and 

management level;

–  strengthened cyber security; and
– 

focus on shareholder and key stakeholder 
engagement.

Key priorities for 2024:
–  supporting our workforce and the 

operations through the Russian invasion of 
Ukraine;

–  health and safety and employee wellbeing;
–  prepare for changes to 2024 Corporate 

Governance Code;
recruit a Director from an ethnic minority 
group;

–  aim to improve Board diversity and meet 

targets;

–  succession planning at Board and diversity 

at management level;

–  continue focus on shareholder and key 

stakeholder engagement; and

–  continue to strengthen and broaden cyber 

security.

I hope you find this report useful and 
informative. I look forward to engaging with as 
many of you as possible at our 2024 Annual 
General Meeting in person and would like to 
encourage you to vote your shares even if you 
cannot attend in person, so that we gain a 
better understanding of the views of our 
shareholders as a whole.

Lucio Genovese
Executive Chair
17 April 2024

Ukraine and the global Covid-19 pandemic. 
The Board site visit was replaced with a 
Board Strategy Day followed by a regulatory 
and legal upskilling and training Day. 

the Board keeps its balance of skills, 
knowledge, experience, independence and 
diversity under review, which is beneficial in 
bringing new perspectives to the Board. 

We continued to enhance our shareholder 
and stakeholder engagement and we 
place their interests at the centre of our 
considerations for key decisions. Our 
Section 172 Statement set out on pages 
64 to 71 provides further details on how 
the Board complied throughout the year.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has 
not adversely impacted the operation 
of the Board or its Committees. 

Supporting local communities 
during the war in Ukraine
During the year, in addition to our continued 
support for communities locally, the Ferrexpo 
Humanitarian Fund which was set up as 
a dedicated fund, initially in the amount of 
US$1.5 million and increased to US$15 million, 
continued to support the communities in 
Ukraine. This funding enabled the purchase 
of personal protective equipment and 
equipment for local hospitals amongst other 
things (see the Responsible Business section 
of the Strategic Report on pages 32 to 63. 

In addition to the Ferrexpo Humanitarian 
Fund, regular community support activities 
took place largely in Ukraine and donations 
were made within a Board-approved 
framework agreed annually at the time of 
setting the budget. All such community 
support and donations are subject to internal 
control and approval limits applicable 
within the individual subsidiaries of the 
Group, which are set by the Board.

The Board exercises control of the Ferrexpo 
Humanitarian Fund and local charitable 
spending via its Health, Safety, Environment 
and Community (“HSEC”) Committee, 
which oversees and directs these activities 
and receives reports detailing the spend. 

Board changes
The issue of diversity, both in the Boardroom 
and throughout the entire Group, is taken 
very seriously by the Board as we believe 
this improves effectiveness, encourages 
constructive debate, delivers strong 
performance and enhances the success 
of the business. Ensuring that we have a 
culture which promotes and values diversity, 
and one which is maintained throughout the 
business, is a continual prime focus and is 
underpinned by our Diversity, Equity and 
Inclusion Policy, which sets our objectives.

Further to significant Board changes and 
commitments made last year, we announced 
further changes to the Board and Board 
Committee roles during the year. In 
accordance with best practice requirements 
of the UK Corporate Governance Code, 

resigned as an independent Non-executive 
Director and Chair of the Audit Committee. 

– 

–  On 25 May 2023, Jim North resigned as an 
Executive Director and Nikolay Kladiev was 
appointed as an Executive Director. 
Ann-Christin Andersen resigned as an 
independent Non-executive Director and 
Natalie Polischuk was appointed as Chair 
of the Group HSEC’s Committee.

–  On 30 June 2023, Jim North resigned as 
Chief Executive Officer. On behalf of the 
Board and everyone at Ferrexpo, I would 
like to thank Jim for his significant and 
outstanding contribution to the Group to 
modernise and optimise operational 
efficiency and exemplary leadership while 
transforming the entire business and 
establishing the foundations for Ferrexpo’s 
growth strategy in Ukraine. 

–  On 1 July 2023, I was appointed to act as 
Executive Chair on an interim basis and 
assume leadership of the Group.

–  On 22 October 2023, Stuart Brown was 

appointed as an independent Non-
executive Director and a member of the 
Audit Committee. 

–  On 31 December 2023, Graeme Dacomb 

–  Since the end of the reporting year, on 
1 January 2024, Stuart Brown was 
appointed as Chair of the Audit 
Committee. 

Throughout the year, the Board continued 
to search for an Independent Non-executive 
Director from an ethnic minority group, 
led by the Nominations Committee and 
supported by external consultants.

Until May 2023, there were three female 
Directors further strengthening Board 
independence and diversity. Due to Board 
changes, by the end of the year female 
representation unfortunately dropped down 
to 29% but currently stands at 33%. 

Board performance review 
In line with the UK Corporate Governance 
Code, Board performance was assessed 
externally in 2021 and internally in 2022. 
Therefore, during the year, an internally 
assessed review of the performance and 
effectiveness of the Board, its Committees 
and each of the Directors was undertaken. 
A report on the process, activities, findings 
and actions of the evaluation can be found 
on pages 110 to 112. An external Board 
performance evaluation will take place in 2024. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS96

Governance at a Glance

Group structure

SHAREHOLDERS

BOARD

AUDIT  
COMMITTEE 

REMUNERATION  
COMMITTEE 

NOMINATIONS  
COMMITTEE 

Responsibilities include: 

Responsibilities include: 

Responsibilities include: 

–  Monitoring integrity of financial statements.
–  Reviewing internal control and risk 

management systems.

–  Relationship with external auditor.

–  Reviewing and approving all aspects of 

remuneration for Executive Directors and 
members of the Executive Committee.
–  Aligning remuneration policy and practices 

to support strategy.

–  Engaging with shareholders to receive 
feedback on remuneration policy and 
outcomes.

–  Considering and approving the knowledge, 
skills and experience mix required for the 
Board to best deliver the Company’s 
objectives.
Identifying and nominating (for Board 
approval) candidates to fill Board vacancies, 
having due regard to the need to satisfy the 
Board’s skills requirements.

– 

Read the Audit  
Committee Report  
on page 114

Read the Directors’  
Remuneration Report  
on page 126

Read the Nominations  
Committee Report  
on page 121

COMMITTEE OF INDEPENDENT  
DIRECTORS (“CID”) 

HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT 
AND COMMUNITY (“HSEC”) COMMITTEE 

EXECUTIVE CHAIR AND  
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE1 

Responsibilities include: 

Responsibilities include: 

Responsibilities include: 

–  Ensuring compliance with related party 

–  Formulating and monitoring the 

transaction rules and the Relationship 
Agreement.

–  Authorising (if appropriate) related party 
transactions on behalf of the Board.
–  Conflicts of interest procedure under the 

Companies Act 2006.

implementation of the Group’s policy on 
issues relating to health and safety, 
environment and community as they affect 
operations. 

–  Execution of Board-approved strategies.
–  Delegated authority levels for senior 

management.

–  Development and implementation of Group 

policies.

–  Specific focus on safety and climate change 

–  All material matters not reserved for the 

impacts.

entire Board.

Find out more  
on page 106

Find out more in the  
Responsible Business section  
on page 32

Find out more  
on page 102 

1.  The Finance, Risk Management and Compliance Committee, Investment Committee and the Executive Related Party Matters Committee all report to the Executive Committee.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
 
 
 
 
 
97

Board diversity, tenure and balance

Board balance

Board diversity – Gender

Board diversity – Age

2023

2023

2023

 Independent:  

 Non-independent:  

 Executive Chair:  

 Executive:  

4

0

1

1

 Female:  

 Male:  

2

4

 40-49:  

 50-59:  

 60+:  

1

2

3

Board diversity – Ethnic group

Board tenure

2023

2023

 White:  

  Mixed/Multiple  
Ethnic Group:  

6

0

 0-5 years:  

 5-9 years:  

 9+ years:  

4

1

1

Skills matrix

Expertise

Mining, Global Resource Industry

Business leadership and strategy

Corporate governance

ESG/Sustainability

Financial, Audit & Risk

CIS geographical experience 

Government and international relations

HSEC

Human capital management/Remuneration

Investor relations management

Risk management

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

100%

% of Board 
members

63%

71%

67%

71%

92%

88%

67%

71%

75%

79%

92%

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS98

Board of Directors

An experienced Board

Raffaele (Lucio) Genovese 
Executive Chair

Date of appointment
1 July 2023 as Acting Executive Chair

24 August 2020 as Chair

13 February 2019 as Non-independent  
Non-executive Director

Current external appointments
Currently, he serves as chair of CoTec 
Holdings, listed on NEX Board of the TSVX, 
since 2021; and chief executive officer of 
Nage Capital Management AG, a Swiss based 
investment and advisory firm, since 2004.

Previous appointments
Previously, he was non-executive director of 
Nevada Copper Inc 2016–2023; non-executive 
director of Mantos Copper SA, 2015–2022; 
independent non-executive director of Ferrous 
Resources Limited, 2014–2019; chair of Firestone 
Diamonds Plc, 2012–2020; an Independent Non-
executive Director of Ferrexpo plc, 2007–2014; 
senior executive officer, Copper Division, Glencore 
International, 1996–1999 and chief executive officer, 
CIS Operations, Glencore International, 1992–1998.

Skills, expertise and contribution
Lucio contributes to Ferrexpo plc over 35 
years of commercial experience in the metals 
and mining industry. He worked at Glencore 
International AG where he held several senior 
positions including the CEO of the CIS region.

Lucio brings a deep knowledge across the Ferrous 
and Non-Ferrous Mining sector, including in iron 
ore. He has extensive experience of operating in 
emerging markets, specifically in the CIS states. 
As a previous Board member (from 2007 to 2014) 
and as a Board member of Ferrexpo AG, Lucio 
has in-depth knowledge of the Group which is 
extremely valuable to the Company at a Board level.

Nikolay Kladiev
Executive Director 
Chief Financial Officer

Date of appointment
25 May 2023 as Executive Director

Nikolay was appointed Group Chief 
Financial Officer on 4 August 2021.

Current external appointments
N/A

Previous appointments
Nikolay joined the Group in 2005, and contributed 
significantly to the Group’s IPO. Since 2007, 
Nikolay has served on the Board of FPM as CFO. 
During his 18 years with Ferrexpo, Nikolay has 
overseen FPM’s finance function, and has been 
directly responsible for maintaining the Group’s 
position as a low cost pellet producer during this 
time. Prior to Ferrexpo, Nikolay held a number 
of audit positions with Arthur Andersen and 
Ernst & Young in Ukraine and Eastern Europe. 

Skills, expertise and contribution
Nikolay is a Chartered Accountant (UK) and has 
a Masters in International Economic Relations 
from Kyiv National Economic University.

Fiona MacAulay
Senior Independent 
Non-executive Director

Date of appointment
12 August 2019

10 February 2022 as Senior Independent Director 

Current external appointments
Non-executive director of Dowlais Group plc 
since April 2023; Non-executive director of 
Costain Group Plc since April 2022; non-executive 
director of Chemring Group plc since 2020. 

Previous appointments
Previously, she was non-executive chair of IOG Plc 
2019–2023; non-executive director of AIM listed 
Coro Energy, 2017–2022; chief executive officer 
of Echo Energy plc, 2017–2018; non-executive 
director, 2018–2019 and chief operating officer 
of Rockhopper Exploration plc, 2013–2017.

Skills, expertise and contribution
Fiona contributes to Ferrexpo plc over 35 years’ 
experience in the upstream oil and gas sector 
including key roles in a number of leading oil 
and gas firms across the large, mid and small 
cap space including Mobil, BG Group, Amerada 
Hess, Echo Energy and Rockhopper.

Fiona brings a strong focus on health, safety, 
climate change and culture with a deep 
understanding of the factors influencing the 
management for safe, efficient and commercial 
operations. In 2022, she completed a Diligent 
Climate Leadership Certification programme. 
She has extensive operational experience in 
emerging energy which enables her to bring 
positive insight on a broad range of issues 
to Board and Committee discussions. 

Committee membership

Committee membership

Committee membership

C

N/A

C  

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
Gender breakdown

Key to committee membership

 Male  

 Female  

67%

33%

  Audit Committee

  Remuneration Committee

 Nominations Committee

  Committee of Independent 
Directors (“CID”)

  Health, Safety, Environment and 
Community (“HSEC”) Committee

  Executive Chair and Executive 
Committee

C  Committee Chair

99

Vitalii Lisovenko
Independent 
Non-executive Director

Natalie Polischuk
Independent 
Non-executive Director

Stuart Brown
Independent 
Non-executive Director

Date of appointment
28 November 2016

Date of appointment
29 December 2021

Date of appointment
22 October 2023

Current external appointments
Currently, she serves as non-executive 
director of Dobrobut (Ukraine), since 2018. 

Previous appointments
Previously, she was non-executive 
director and treasurer of Lycée Français 
Anne de Kyiv, 2014–2020.

Skills, expertise and contribution
Natalie brings over 25 years of private equity 
experience in Eastern Europe, having held 
a number of senior roles at private equity 
funds in the region and having acted as an 
independent advisor on a number of M&A 
and due diligence projects in Ukraine.

Current external appointments
Currently, he serves as Non-executive Chairman of 
Lucapa Diamond Company Limited, since 2024.

Previous appointments
Previously, he was president and CEO of Mountain 
Province Diamonds Inc 2018–2021; CEO of 
Firestone Diamonds Plc 2013–2018; Group CFO 
and Acting Joint CEO De Beers Group 2006–2011

Skills, expertise and contribution
Stuart is a seasoned mining executive with 
extensive board-level experience. He previously held 
both CFO and CEO roles at De Beers and its various 
subsidiaries, where he played a central role in 
reshaping the group and positioning it for the future. 
Most recently, Stuart served as President and CEO 
at Mountain Province Diamonds Inc., a company 
listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and as CEO 
of Firestone Diamonds Plc, formerly listed on AIM 
where he established a track record of building 
teams and leading business transformation to 
develop lean, agile, high-performing organisations.

Current external appointments
Currently, he serves as a non-executive advisor 
to the Minister of Finance of Ukraine, having 
previously served as an executive counsellor 
to the Minister of Finance. He also serves as a 
non-executive director of the Supervisory Board 
of National Depositary of Ukraine since 2014. 

Previous appointments
Previously, he was an executive director of 
Ukreximbank (Ukraine), 2006–2010; an executive 
director of Alfa Bank Ukraine, 2010–2014; a 
non-executive director of Amsterdam Trade 
Bank, 2013–2014; and a non-executive alternate 
director, Black Sea Trade and Development 
Bank (Greece), 2014–2019; and since 1994 
held various positions in the Finance Ministry of 
Ukraine. He also was an Associate Professor of 
Finance at the Kyiv State Economic University.

Skills, expertise and contribution
Vitalii contributes to Ferrexpo plc over 25 
years’ experience in government finance. In 
2005, he served as the head of the Trade and 
Economic Mission at the Ukrainian Embassy 
in London. He was an Associate Professor of 
Finance at the Kyiv State Economic University. 

Vitalii brings extensive experience in the field of 
Ukrainian government finance together with a 
deep understanding of geopolitical developments 
in Ukraine, which is valuable to the Group. 

Committee membership

Committee membership

Committee membership

C  

C  

C  

Non-executive Director designate 
for workforce engagement.

Natalie was appointed as a member of the 
Committee of Independent Directors in 
February 2023. She was appointed Chair 
of the HSEC Committee in May 2023. 

Stuart was appointed Chair of Audit 
Committee and a member of the Remuneration 
Committee in January 2024. He was 
appointed a member of the Committee of 
Independent Directors in February 2024.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
100

Executive Committee

An experienced and focused 
Management Team

Raffaele (Lucio) Genovese 
Executive Chair 

Nikolay Kladiev
Chief Financial Officer

For more information see page 98 for details.

For more information see page 98 for details.

Viktor Lotous
FPM General Director and the Chair of 
FPM Supervisory Board

Viktor brings to the Executive Committee 
more than 35 years of mining and processing 
experience as well as deep understanding 
of Ferrexpo, its culture and context.

Skills and experience
Viktor began his career with FPM in 1986. In 1997, 
he assumed the role of Chief Engineer and in 
2007 was appointed General Director and Chair 
of the Supervisory Board of FPM. In this role, he 
is charged with leading and ensuring safe and 
responsible operations, optimising performance, 
executing future growth options and delivering 
commercial value across the company’s operational 
footprint in Ukraine. In 2023, Viktor additionally 
assumed the position of Chief Operating Officer, on 
an interim basis, with operational oversight of the 
Group’s assets in Ukraine. He is a graduate of Kryvyi 
Rih Mining and Ore Institute, and of the Kyiv National 
Economic University, specialising in Finance.

Greg Nortje
Chief Human Resources Officer

Yaroslavna Blonska
Acting Chief Marketing Officer

Greg joined Ferrexpo in January 2014. 

He previously held a variety of international 
Human Resources leadership positions with Anglo 
American and BHP Billiton before establishing 
his own human resources consultancy firm 
to a range of clients across the UK. Particular 
specialisms include project management and 
business change execution, organisational 
effectiveness, talent management, governance 
and compliance, and leadership development.

Skills and experience
He has Advanced Management qualifications 
from the University of Stellenbosch Business 
School and the Gordon Institute of Business 
Science, a Bachelor of Arts degree and a 
postgraduate Diploma in Education from 
the University of the Witwatersrand.

Yaroslavna was appointed the Acting Chief 
Marketing Officer on 22 August 2022.

Yaroslavna joined Ferrexpo in 2002.

Since joining Ferrexpo Yaroslavna has held a 
number of key roles within the Group’s Marketing 
team, including Head of Sales for customers in 
Europe and Turkey, management of the Group’s 
Asian and European customers, membership 
of the representative board for the Group’s port 
loading subsidiary, TIS-Ruda. Yaroslavna has been 
acting as a focal point for the Group’s government 
and public relations within Ukraine. She has also 
been managing Ferrexpo’s office in Kyiv since 
2006. Yaroslavna has been helping to facilitate 
the Group’s Fe_munity Women in Leadership 
programme as a speaker and a mentor.

Skills and experience
She holds a Master of Business Administration 
degree from Kyiv State Economic University 
and a post graduate Diploma in Law from 
Taras Shevchenko National University, Kyiv.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Corporate Governance Compliance

101

As a premium listed company on the London Stock Exchange, the Company is 
subject to the 2018 Corporate Governance Code. This section explains how we 
applied the principles of the 2018 Corporate Governance Code. A copy of the 
Corporate Governance Code can be found at frc.org.uk. 

Statement of Compliance (in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.6R(5))
The Board considers the Company has complied throughout the year ended 31 December 2023 with all the provisions of the 2018 Corporate 
Governance Code except as set out below: 

–  Provision 9: The Chair was not independent on appointment and the role of Chief Executive and Chairman is undertaken by one person – 

Lucio Genovese, the Company’s Executive Chair.

–  Provision 19: The Chair has remained in post for more than nine years since his first appointment to the Board in June 2007. Mr Genovese’s 
tenure ran from 12 June 2007 to 1 August 2014, and he rejoined the Board on 13 February 2019. Therefore, whilst the total tenure exceeds 
nine years there was a significant break in Mr Genovese’s tenure between 2014 and 2019. 

Explanations for not complying with provisions 9 and 19 of the Corporate Governance Code as the Chair was not independent on appointment, 
the role of Chief Executive and Chairman should not be undertaken by the same person and his tenure exceeds the recommended nine-year 
term are provided below. The Corporate Governance Code sets out the governance principles and provisions that applied to the Company 
during 2023. The Corporate Governance Code is not a rigid set of rules, and consists of principles and provisions. The Company complied with 
all the principles and detailed provisions of the Corporate Governance Code in 2023 except for Provisions 9 and 19. Provision 9 recommends 
that the Chair be independent on appointment and the role of the Chair and Chief Executive should not be undertaken by the same person. 
Provision 19 recommends that the Chair should not remain in post beyond nine years from the date of first appointment to the Board. 

Explanations for non-compliance with Provision 9 and 19:

As explained in previous annual reports the Chair was not independent on appointment, however, the Board was satisfied that Mr Genovese 
is fully independent from all the Company’s shareholders and has been during his entire tenure as a Non-executive Director. Additionally, upon 
his appointment as Chair the members of the Nominations Committee were comfortable based on their own experiences that Mr Genovese 
conducts himself with professional and personal integrity with an independent mindset and brings valuable challenge to the Board based on 
his in-depth understanding of the key drivers and challenges faced by the Group.

Following the resignation of the Chief Executive Officer, the decision was taken to combine the roles of the Chair and Chief Executive Officer on 
an interim basis as with the ongoing war in Ukraine and the need for business continuity it was not considered the right time to commence an 
external search process for a new Chief Executive Officer.

Although the role of the Chair and Chief Executive are undertaken by the same person, the Board believes that there is sufficient separation of 
responsibilities of the roles usually undertaken by the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer amongst the Executive Chair, the Chief Financial 
Officer, the Senior Independent Director, the Committee of Independent Directors, the Group Company Secretary and the Company’s Senior 
Management team. The Board, with assistance from the Nomination Committee, keeps this temporary arrangement under review.

Mr Genovese was first appointed to the Board as a Director in June 2007 and retired in August 2014. After a near five-year break, he re-joined 
the Board in February 2019 as a non-Independent Non-executive Director. In August 2020 he was appointed as Chair of the Board and most 
recently in July 2023 he was appointed interim Executive Chair.

Mr Genovese has led the Board through the continuing Russian invasion of Ukraine, ensuring continuity of the Board agenda and meetings 
together with ongoing corporate initiatives whilst operating at a time of war. 

The Board believes Mr Genovese is the right person to chair the Board and exercise executive leadership of the Group at this time. To provide 
continuity of his sound leadership, the Board requests your support to re-elect Mr Genovese at the 2024 AGM.

Further details on the composition of the Board and its Committees are set out on page 104 and further details of the role of the Senior 
Independent Director are set out on page 106. 

The Board confirms that at the date of this report, unless otherwise explained above, the Company fully complied with all relevant provisions of 
the Corporate Governance Code. Further information on the Company’s compliance with the Principles of the Corporate Governance Code can 
be found on the following pages:

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS102

Corporate Governance Compliance continued

Board leadership and 
Company purpose

Principle A:   Executive Chair’s Statement page 2, Stakeholder Engagement – Section 172 Statement pages 64 to 71, 

Skills Matrix page 97

Principle B:  Executive Chair’s Statement page 2, Our Business Model pages 8 to 10, Understanding our Strategic 

Direction pages 12 to 14, Stakeholder Engagement – Section 172 Statement pages 64 to 71
Principle C:  Key Performance Indicators pages 14 to 17, Risk Management pages 72 to 73, Principal risks pages 74 

to 90, Internal Controls page 119

Principle D:  Executive Chair’s Review page 2, Our Stakeholders page 65, Responsible Business: Safety and our 
People page 34, Operating during a time of war: Local communities page 6, Responsible Business: 
Governance pages 62 to 63, Stakeholder Engagement – Section 172 pages 64 to 71

Principle E:  Non-Financial Information Statement page 63, Our engagement activities in 2023 page 64, Stakeholder 

and workforce engagement page 108, Whistleblowing Policy page 120

Division of 
responsibilities

Principle F:  Executive Chair’s Introduction page 2, Statement of Compliance page 101, Role Descriptions page 106, 

Board Leadership pages 107 to 109, Board Evaluation pages 110 to 112

Principle G:  Group Structure page 96, Board of Directors pages 98 to 99, Role Descriptions page 106
Principle H:  Corporate Governance At a Glance page 96, Board of Directors pages 98 to 99, Time Commitment page 

Composition, 
succession, 
evaluation

105, Role Descriptions page 106

Principle I:  Skills Matrix page 97, Time commitment and Non-executive Director external appointments during 2023 

page 105, Board Leadership pages 107 to 109

Principle J:  Diversity page 97, Nominations Committee Report page 121
Principle K:  Board Diversity, tenure and balance page 97, Board Composition page 104 Skills Matrix page 97, 

Succession Planning and Recruitment page 122

Principle L:  Board Evaluation pages 110 to 112

Audit, risk, 
internal control

Principle M:  External Audit page 120, Internal Audit page 119
Principle N:  Audit Committee Report pages 114 to 120, Responsibility statement of the Directors in respect of the 

Annual Reports and Accounts page 157

Principle O:  Risk Management pages 72 to 73, Principal Risks pages 74 to 90, Internal Control and Risk Management 

page 119

Remuneration

Principle P:  Remuneration policy pages 126 to 151
Principle Q:  Our approach to remuneration page 126, Performance and Reward pages 126 to 127, Implementation of 

the remuneration policy in 2024 page 128 

Principle R:  Remuneration Report pages 126 to 151

Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules
By virtue of the information included in this Corporate Governance Report and the Directors’ Report, the Company complied with the corporate 
governance statement requirements of the FCA’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

103

Diversity

We report our Board and executive management diversity data as at 31 December 2023 in accordance with the new UK Listing Rules disclosure 
requirements and our progress in meeting the new UK Listing Rules board diversity targets. 

As at 31 December 2023, following director changes during the year, women represented 29% of the Board see page 95 and accordingly the 
target of 40% females on the Board has not been met. A male director resigned on 31 December 2023 which increased the percentage of 
females on the board to 33% as at 1 January 2024. Fiona MacAulay is the Senior Independent Director, see page 98 and therefore one of the 
senior Board positions was occupied by a woman; however, so far a Director from an ethnic minority background has not yet been appointed. 
The Board remains committed to enhancing its gender and ethnic diversity and during the year, actively continued the search for a further 
Independent Non-executive Director from an ethnic minority background, led by the Nominations Committee and supported by external 
consultants, see page 124. 

The gender diversity of the Board and executive management as at 31 December 2023:

Men

Women

Other categories

Not specified/prefer not to say

Number of Board 
members

Percentage of the 
Board

Number of senior 
positions on the 
Board (CEO, CFO, 
SID and Chair)*

Number in 
executive 
management

Percentage of 
executive 
management

5

2

–

–

71%

29%

–

–

2

1

–

–

5

1

–

–

83%

17%

–

–

* 

The role of Chair and CEO were combined on 1 July 2023 and counted as one position in order not to double count.

The ethnic diversity of the Board and executive management as at 31 December 2023:

White British or other White (including minority-white groups)

Mixed/Multiple Ethnic Groups

Asian/Asian British

Black/African/Caribbean/Black British

Other ethnic group, including Arab

Not specified/prefer not to say

Number of Board 
members

Percentage of the 
Board

Number of senior 
positions on the 
Board (CEO, CFO, 
SID and Chair)

Number in 
executive 
management

Percentage of 
executive 
management

7

–

–

–

–

–

100%

–

–

–

–

–

3

–

–

–

–

–

6

-

–

–

–

–

100%

-

–

–

–

–

* 

The role of Chair and CEO were combined on 1 July 2023 and counted as one position in order not to double count.

Notes: 
–  Executive management for these purposes includes the Group Company Secretary but excludes administrative and support staff (as defined by the UK Listing Rules). 
– 

The Company confirms that the approach to collecting data forming the basis of the gender and ethnic diversity of the Board and senior management of the Company was consistent 
for the purposes of reporting under both LR 9.8.6R(9) and (10) and was consistent across all individuals in relation to whom data was reported. Board members, members of executive 
management and the Group Company Secretary were provided with a standard form questionnaire on a strictly confidential and voluntary basis to allow the individual to self-report on 
their gender and ethnicity (or to specify that they do not wish to report such data). The questionnaire was fully aligned to the definitions set out in the UK Listing Rules, with individuals 
asked to specify: 

i. 

self-reported gender identity – selection from (a) male, (b) female, (c) other category/please specify and (d) not specified/prefer not to say; and 

ii.  self-reported ethnic background – selection from (a) White British or other White (including minority-white groups), (b) Mixed/Multiple Ethnic Groups, (c) Asian/Asian British, (d) Black/

African/Caribbean/Black British, (e) Other ethnic group, including Arab and (f) not specified/prefer not to say. 

– 

The Executive Committee includes the Group Company Secretary. For the purposes of the UK Corporate Governance Code, the gender balance of those in senior management (i.e. the 
Executive Committee and their direct reports) was 68.2% male and 31.8% female. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS104

Corporate Governance Report

Controlling shareholder – Relationship Agreement
The Company’s largest shareholder is Fevamotinico S.a.r.l., which as at date of this report holds 49.3% of the voting rights in Ferrexpo plc. 
Fevamotinico S.a.r.l. is wholly owned by The Minco Trust. The Minco Trust is a discretionary trust that has three beneficiaries, consisting of 
Kostyantin Zhevago and two other members of his family. Mr Zhevago is therefore considered a controlling shareholder of the Company. In 
accordance with the UK Listing Rules, Mr Zhevago, The Minco Trust and Fevamotinico S.a.r.l. have entered into a Relationship Agreement with 
the Company (the “Relationship Agreement”) to ensure that the Group is capable of carrying on its business independently, that transactions and 
arrangements between the Group, Fevamotinico S.a.r.l., The Minco Trust and Mr Zhevago (and each of their associates) are at arm’s length and 
on normal commercial terms, and that at all times a majority of the Directors of the Company shall be independent of Fevamotinico S.a.r.l., The 
Minco Trust and Mr Zhevago. Under the Relationship Agreement, Mr Zhevago is entitled to appoint himself as a Director or another person as his 
representative Director, in each case in a non-executive capacity. During the year, Mr Zhevago has not exercised this right. The Relationship 
Agreement terminates if, inter alia, the shareholding of Mr Zhevago and his associates in the Company falls below 24.9%.

Statement of Compliance with UK Listing Rules, Rule 9.8.4 (14)
–  Ferrexpo has complied with the independence provisions contained in UK Listing Rule 9.2.2ADR(1) during 2023.
–  So far as Ferrexpo is aware, each of Mr Zhevago and Fevamotinico S.a.r.l. and their associates have also complied with the independence 

provisions contained in UK Listing Rule 9.2.2ADR(1) during 2023.

–  So far as Ferrexpo is aware, the procurement obligation set out in LR 9.2.2B(2)(a) (which requires Mr Zhevago and Fevamotinico S.a.r.l. to 
procure that The Minco Trust, the non-signing controlling shareholders (being the beneficiaries of The Minco Trust other than Mr Zhevago) 
and their associates comply with the independence provisions contained in UK Listing Rule 9.2.2ADR(1)) has also been complied with 
during 2023.

The Board
The Board is responsible for setting the Group’s objectives and policies, providing effective leadership within the framework of prudent and 
effective controls required for a public company. The Board has a formal schedule setting out the matters requiring Board approval and 
specifically reserved to it for decision. These include:

–  approving the Group strategy and budget;
–  annual and long-term capital expenditure plans;
–  approving contracts for more than a certain monetary amount;
–  monitoring financial performance and critical business issues;
–  approval of major projects and contract awards;
–  approval of key policies and procedures including for dividends, treasury, charitable donations and corporate social responsibility;
–  approval of procedures for the prevention of fraud and bribery; and
– 

through the CID, monitoring and authorising related party transactions.

Certain aspects of the Board’s responsibilities have been delegated to the Committees shown in the chart on page 96 to ensure compliance 
with the Companies Act 2006, FCA Listing Rules and Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules and the UK Corporate Governance Code. 
The terms of reference for each of the Audit Committee, Nominations Committee, Remuneration Committee and HSEC Committee are available 
on the Company’s website at www.ferrexpo.com/about-ferrexpo/corporate-governance/board-committees. 

It is the responsibility of the Executive Chair and Executive Committee to manage the day-to-day running of the Group.

Board composition and independence
As of 31 December 2023, the Board comprised two Executive Directors and five Independent Non-executive Directors who are considered by 
the Board to be independent in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code. This structure ensures that the Executive Directors are 
subject to appropriate independent and constructive challenge by the Non-executive Directors, and that no single Director can dominate or 
unduly influence decision-making. 

Composition of the Board and Committees as of 31 December 2023 is presented in the table below:

Board member

Role

R L Genovese

Executive Chair

F MacAulay

Senior Independent Non-executive Director

N Kladiev

V Lisovenko

G Dacomb2

N Polischuk

S Brown

Executive Director/Chief Financial Officer

Independent Non-executive Director and
Designate for Employee engagement

Independent Non-executive Director

Independent Non-executive Director

Independent Non-executive Director

1.  The HSEC Committee also includes some members of senior management.
2.  Resigned as a Director on 31 December 2023.
•   Committee member.
••  Committee Chair.

Audit Remuneration

Nominations

CID

HSEC1

••

 •

•

••

•

•

•

•

••

•

•

•

••

•

•

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

105

The Board considers that it is of a sufficient size to ensure that the requirements of the business are met without placing undue reliance on any 
one Director.

Biographical details of the Directors at the date of this report are set out on pages 98 and 99.

Time commitment
It is expected that a Non-executive Director of the Company will normally spend at least two and a half days a month, on average, on Ferrexpo’s 
affairs. The expected time commitment for the Senior Independent Director, the Committee Chairs and, in particular, the Executive Chair is 
considerably more than that. The Non-executive Directors are required to confirm at least annually that they are able to commit sufficient time to 
the affairs of the Company, and all of our Non-executive Directors have given this confirmation in respect of 2023.

All of the Non-executive Directors have been able to make themselves available for the majority of the ad hoc Board and Committee meetings 
and update calls held during the year, notwithstanding their external commitments. The attendance of the Directors at Board and Committee 
meetings during 2023 is shown in the table below.

Non-executive Director external appointments during 2023
During 2023, Ms MacAulay was appointed as non-executive director of Dowlais Group PLC, a company listed on the London Stock Exchange. 
This appointment was considered a significant appointment for Ms MacAulay for the purposes of the UK Corporate Governance Code, and, in 
advance of the appointment, Ms MacAulay sought the prior approval of the Board. As part of approving this additional appointment, the Board 
considered a range of factors, including the existing appointments of Ms MacAulay, the time commitment expected in the role as a Ferrexpo 
Director, attendance records at Ferrexpo Board and committee meetings, institutional investor guidance on the number of board roles in respect 
of over-boarding and the additional time commitment from the new role. The Board was satisfied having regard to these matters that the 
additional role would not adversely impact the ability of Ms MacAulay to perform her existing role on the Ferrexpo Board and its committees. 

Board and Committee meeting attendance in 2023 

Attended/Eligible to attend

Director

Scheduled

Ad hoc Scheduled

Ad hoc Scheduled

Ad hoc Scheduled

Ad hoc Scheduled

Ad hoc Scheduled

Ad hoc

Board

Audit

Remuneration

Nominations

CID

HSEC4

AC Andersen1

G Dacomb2

R L Genovese

N Kladiev3

V Lisovenko

F MacAulay4

J North5

N Polischuk6

S Brown7

3/3

5/5

5/5

2/2

5/5

5/5

3/3

5/5

1/1

1/3

5/10

9/10

5/7

7/10

6/10

2/3

6/10

1/1

5/5

5/5

4/4

5/5

1/1

2/2

4/4

4/4

4/4

2/2

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

3/2

5/5

5/5

5/5

1/2

5/5

4/5

5/5

4/4

3/4

2/2

2/2

4/4

1.  Ms Andersen resigned on 25 May 2023. 
2.  Mr Dacomb resigned on 31 December 2023.
3.  Mr Kaldiev was appointed as an Executive Director on 25 May 2023.
4.  Ms MacAulay stepped down as a member of the Audit Committee on 1 August 2023.
5.  Mr North resigned as Executive Director on 25 May 2023.
6.  Ms Polischuk was appointed as a member of the Committee of Independent Directors 9 February 2023.
7.  Mr Brown was appointed as an independent Non-executive Director and a member of the Audit Committee on 22 October 2023.

During the year, there were a number of ad hoc Board and Committee meetings at short notice or update calls which dealt with (amongst other 
things) the Russian invasion of Ukraine and other developments in Ukraine involving or impacting the Group. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
106

Corporate Governance Report continued

Role descriptions
A summary of the roles of the Chair, the CEO, the Executive Chair, the Senior Independent Director, the Non-executive Directors and the 
Company Secretary is set out in the following table. The table also includes an overview of the role of the Executive Committee and of the 
Committee of Independent Directors. The roles of the Audit and Nominations Committees are set out later in this Corporate Governance Report, 
the role of the HSEC Committee in the Strategic Report on page 30, and the role of the Remuneration Committee in the Remuneration Report on 
page 126.

Role

Chair

Description

The Chair is responsible for leadership of the Board, ensuring its effectiveness, setting its agenda, ensuring that it receives 
accurate, clear and timely information, and ensuring effective communication with shareholders. The Chair also ensures that 
there is a constructive relationship between the Executive and Non-executive Directors. At least once annually the Chair 
holds meetings with the Non-executive Directors without the Executive Director present. Mr Genovese’s other current 
responsibilities are set out in the biographical notes on page 98. Due to the complexity of the jurisdictions in which the Group 
operates and in light of Russia’s current invasion of Ukraine, the time commitment of the role significantly increased during 
the reporting period especially with the need to engage proactively with the broad range of stakeholders. 

CEO

The role of the CEO is to provide leadership of the executive team, implement Group strategy through executive committees, 
chair the Executive Committee, and oversee and implement Board-approved actions. 

Executive 
Chair

With effect from 1 July 2023 the roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer as described above have been combined on an 
interim basis.

Senior 
Independent 
Director

The Senior Independent Director, in conjunction with the other Independent Non-executive Directors, assists in 
communications and meetings with shareholders and other stakeholders concerning corporate governance matters. At least 
once a year, the Senior Independent Director meets the Non-executive Directors, without the Chair present, to evaluate the 
Chair’s performance. The Senior Independent Director is also available to discuss with shareholders any issues that the Chair 
has been unable to resolve to shareholders’ satisfaction.

Non-executive 
Directors

Company 
Secretary

Executive 
Committee

Committee of 
Independent 
Directors 
(“CID”)

The Non-executive Directors provide an independent and objective viewpoint to Board discussions and bring experience 
from a variety of industry backgrounds. Their role is to provide constructive support and challenge to executive management. 
Acting either as the Board or as members of its Committees, the Non-executive Directors approve budgets; discuss and 
contribute to strategic proposals and agree on corporate strategy; monitor the integrity, consistency and effectiveness of 
financial information, internal controls and risk management systems; monitor management’s execution of strategy against 
agreed targets and determine their remuneration accordingly (see the Remuneration Report on page 126); and monitor 
executive succession planning (for Board succession planning, see the Nominations Committee Report on page 122). From 
time to time, where delegated by the Board, individual Non-executive Directors may take on additional functions in areas in 
which they have particular knowledge or expertise.

The Company Secretary is responsible for ensuring that Board procedures are followed and that applicable rules and 
regulations are complied with. The Company Secretary is also responsible for advising the Board on all governance matters 
and for ensuring, with the Chair, that information reaches Board members in a timely fashion, so that they are alerted to 
issues and have time to reflect on them properly before deciding how to address them. All Directors have access to the 
advice and services of the Company Secretary.

The Executive Committee is a key decision-making body of the Group, responsible for managing and taking all material 
decisions relating to the Group, apart from those set out in the Schedule of Matters Reserved for the Board. It has delegated 
responsibility from the Board for the execution of Board-approved strategies for the Group, for ensuring that appropriate 
levels of authority are delegated to senior management, for the review of organisational structures and for the development 
and implementation of Group policies. The Executive Committee meets regularly during the year.

The CID is composed of the Senior Independent Director and three other Independent Non-executive Directors. The CID 
considers and, if appropriate, authorises on behalf of the Board, related party transactions and otherwise ensures 
compliance with the related party transaction rules and the Relationship Agreement entered into between Fevamotinico 
S.a.r.l., Mr Zhevago, The Minco Trust and the Company. The CID holds delegated authority to consider and, if appropriate, 
approve situations which give rise to an actual or potential conflict of interest for any member of the Board in accordance 
with the Companies Act 2006. The CID keeps under review the authorisation and approval process relating to related party 
transactions (which are also reviewed in detail by the Executive Related Party Matters Committee (“ERPMC”)) and satisfies 
itself that, as required under the Relationship Agreement, transactions with the Group’s controlling shareholders or their 
associates are conducted at an arm’s length basis and on normal commercial terms.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

107

Legal and other actions against the 
Group in Ukraine
Throughout the year the Board had to address 
an increasing number of legal and other 
actions being taken against the Group in 
Ukraine, many of which related to matters not 
directly involving the Group. These actions 
included a freeze (“arrest”) being placed on 
50.3% of the shares which Ferrexpo owns in 
three of its Ukrainian operating subsidiaries, 
the blocking of bank accounts of Ferrexpo’s 
main operating subsidiary in Ukraine, Ferrexpo 
Poltava Mining (“FPM”), and the arrest of senior 
management personnel in FPM in connection 
with the alleged illegal sale of waste products. 
This latter action resulted in Ferrexpo 
having to make bail payments in Ukraine of 
approximately US$15 million. Furthermore, the 
Board had to address and assess the risks 
related to the contested surities claim in the 
amount of UAH4.7 billion (US$124 million as 
at 31 December 2023) and the application 
to open bankruptcy proceedings (“creditor 
protection proceedings”) against the Group’s 
major subsidiary in Ukraine filed by a supplier 
and a related party of the Group because an 
unfavourable outcome in these two cases 
would have an adverse impact on the Group’s 
cash flow generation, profitability and liquidity. 
Further details can be found in Note 2 Basis 
of preparation and Note 30 Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes to the 
Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Board has taken or overseen a number 
of actions intended to protect the interests 
and assets of the Group and all of its 
shareholders, including commencing legal 
actions in Ukraine where possible and making 
appropriate representations to Government 
officials both in Ukraine and elsewhere 
about the need to protect Ferrexpo’s 
interests and ensure that any private 
matters relating to the Group’s controlling 
shareholder do not adversely impact the 
Group. This has included emphasising 
that as a Company with a premium listing 
on the London Stock Exchange the 
Company is required to, and does, operate 
independently of its controlling shareholder.

Board Leadership

Before setting out the Board’s activities in 
2023, it is important to note that since the 
Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Board has 
continued to meet regularly to discuss the 
ongoing situation in Ukraine, the execution 
of the Group’s business continuity plans, 
planning for different eventualities and 
adjustments to the corporate calendar. 
The Board receives regular updates from 
the management team as to the Group’s 
response and scenario planning for different 
eventualities. Protecting the Group’s workforce 
is a key priority, as well as taking steps 
to protect the business and thereby the 
stakeholders of the business. This will remain 
a key priority for the Board during 2024.

Board activity in 2023
Five scheduled Board meetings were held 
in 2023 (supplemented by other ad hoc 
meetings, telephone or video conferences 
and written resolutions as required from 
time to time). Although all scheduled Board 
meetings were held in person, some ad 
hoc meetings and Board calls were held 
via video conference with management 
team members and other Group personnel 
joining to discuss matters as appropriate. 
The Board intends to continue to hold its 
scheduled meetings in person during 2024.

The Board’s programme of meetings allows 
key areas of focus to be established and 
reviewed on a regular basis. A review of the 
Board forward agenda was undertaken early in 
the year to align key focus areas with strategy. 
Rolling agendas have been developed within 
the Board forward agenda for the Board, Audit, 
Nominations and Remuneration Committees 
to ensure the necessary standing items 
are covered during the course of the year, 
and sufficient time is allocated to strategic 
discussions, with extra time factored in for ad 
hoc and additional items. Agendas are agreed 
with the Chair (or with the Chair of the relevant 
Committee) and timeframes set in advance for 
the various meetings, thereby ensuring that the 
full agenda can be covered in the time allotted.

Board and Committee meeting packs are 
prepared by management following input 
on the agendas formulated by the Company 
Secretary and the respective Chairs, and 
made available electronically prior to the 
meeting via a secure online Board portal, 
thereby allowing the Directors adequate 
time to consider the variety of issues 
to be presented and discussed. In the 
minutes of the meetings, issues identified 
for follow-up are set out, ensuring that 
matters raised by the Directors are actioned 
and reported back in a timely manner.

At each scheduled Board meeting, the 
Directors receive a report from each of the 
Executive Chair and the Chief Financial 
Officer and will review and approve the 
minutes from previous Board meetings and 
note Board Committee minutes. There is 
also an oral report from the Chair of each 
Board Committee, providing an overview 
of the matters discussed at the Committee 
meetings which are held before the scheduled 
Board meetings. The Board may also 
receive a report from the Chief Marketing 
Officer relating to updates on the Group’s 
marketing strategy, product development and 
relationships with the Group’s customers. 

The Executive Chair’s report will include 
matters relating to production and operations, 
safety measures and performance against 
targets, iron ore market conditions, growth 
projects, implementation of diversity and 
inclusion policies and updates on the position 
in Ukraine. The Chief Financial Officer’s report 
covers financial performance as compared 
to budget, financial forecasts and cash 
flow position, with a particular focus during 
2023 on the going concern assessment 
given the situation in Ukraine. The Executive 
Chair will report on developments relating 
to investor and stakeholder engagement 
(including shareholder feedback), relevant 
corporate governance matters and Board 
refreshment and succession planning. 

In addition to formal Board and Committee 
meetings, the Senior Independent Director 
holds meetings with the Independent 
Non-executive Directors as required, 
enabling open discussions without 
the Executives Director present. 

The following sets out an overview of the key 
areas of focus for the Board during the year.

Russian invasion of Ukraine
The impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine 
remained the key area of focus during the 
year, with the Board undertaking regular 
reviews of the Group’s response to the 
invasion. The Board received regular updates 
from the management team on the Group’s 
response to the invasion, including the safety, 
protection and wellbeing of the workforce and 
details of the support provided to those 
affected by the invasion and their families. 
Updates on safety measures put in place at 
the mine sites and other locations to protect 
the Group’s workforce and assets were also 
provided. The Board also continued the 
Ferrexpo Humanitarian Fund to support 
communities across Ukraine. For further 
details see page 32.

More information can be found throughout 
this Annual Report and Accounts. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS108

Corporate Governance Report continued

Board Leadership (continued)

Climate change and decarbonisation
Climate change has been a standing 
agenda item at all scheduled Board 
meetings and meetings of the HSEC 
Committee throughout the year and will 
continue to be a standing agenda item.

During the year, the Board approved a 
second phase of work to be undertaken by 
Riccardo Plc. This work involved a double-
materiality assessment of the Company’s 
impact on climate change and the impact 
of climate change on the Company.

The risks and opportunities relating to climate 
change that are specific to Ferrexpo are 
summarised in the Task Force for Climate-
related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) on 
pages 43 to 59 of the Strategic Report.

Financial position and liquidity
The Board continuously reviews the 
financial position of the Group, including 
performance against targets, balance 
sheet strength and liquidity. 

During the year, the Group has maintained 
a strong balance sheet, including low levels 
of gross debt and had a positive net cash 
position of US$108 million as at 31 December 
2023 (2022: US$106 million). The Group has 
no debt facilities as at 31 December 2023. 

The Company’s Preliminary and 
Interim results and Annual Report were 
scrutinised and approved by the Board.

Cyber security strategy
In light of heightened cyber security risks 
facing the business due to the ongoing war in 
Ukraine and the rise in cyber security attacks 
globally, maximum protection against cyber 
security attack is a top priority for the Group. 

Stakeholders and workforce 
engagement
Stakeholder considerations and culture 
are an important part of the Board’s 
discussions and decision making. The 
information on pages 64 to 71 provides a 
review of stakeholder engagement activities 
during the year and explains how the Board 
considers stakeholders in decision making.

In December 2023, over two days, 
Mr Lisovenko, Non-executive Director 
Designate for workforce engagement, 
visited our operations in Ukraine and hosted 
a number of engagement sessions with 
a cross section representing a range of 
stakeholder groups within our workforce, 
including operations personnel, a selection 
of middle managers from all three business 
units, senior female leaders, alumni of 
our “Fe_munity” women in leadership 
programmes and people with disabilities. 

During the engagement sessions, members 
of the workforce made comments and 
suggestions on a range of matters and 
posed questions for subsequent response 
by the Board. In February 2024, the Board 
considered the comments, concerns, 
suggestions and questions and will provide 
feedback to the workforce via established 
communication channels. For example, 
members of the workforce requested more 
detail in respect of the current approach 
of running one and sometimes two pellet 
lines, in response to logistics constraints 
caused by the war and that the quality of 
personal protective clothing be improved. For 
further details see page 66 Employees and 
wider workforce, Section 172 Statement. 

The Group also engages with its workforce 
through the biennial employee engagement 
survey, which was last conducted in 2021. The 
survey unfortunately could not be carried out 
in 2023 due to variable staffing of operations 
imposed by constraints brought about 
by the ongoing war, where approximately 
one third of all employees who manually 
complete the survey using tablets are on 
furlough. The Group has employed other 
ways of listening to the workforce, such as 
holding discussions in crib rooms prior to 
shift and including questions and answers 
functionally on the Company’s intranet site and 
eliciting employee feedback via the Rakuten 
Viber social media app. These workforce 
listening channels are an integral aspect of 
understanding the priorities and concerns 
of our people, and help to set priorities for 
the coming period. The Board considers the 
results of the employee listening programme 
and discusses feedback with the Executive 
Chair and the Chief Human Resources Officer, 
including plans for further engagement by 
functional heads with their teams to better 
understand the feedback and to develop joint 
action points focusing on areas of strength 
and areas for improvement. Investigations are 
underway to find a way to conduct a global 
Employee Engagement Survey in 2024.

Board balance and independence
Ensuring the appropriate balance of skills, 
independence and diversity on the Board 
remains a key priority of the Group. 

In line with best practice requirements of the 
UK Corporate Governance Code, during the 
year, the Board reviewed the balance of skills, 
knowledge, experience, independence and 
diversity and focused on improving and 
rebalancing Independent Non-executive 
Director Board and Board Committee roles. 

To that end:

–  Stuart Brown was appointed as an 

independent Non-executive Director and 
a member of the Audit Committee on 
22 October 2023.

–  Natalie Polischuk was appointed as Chair 
of the Group’s Health, Safety, Environment 
and Community (“HSEC”) Committee on 
25 May 2023.

For further details see pages 121 to 124 of the 
Nominations Committee Report.

Governance and risk 
Following on from the governance 
improvement work carried out in 2020, 
during the year the Board carried out 
a review of the Articals of Association. 
Proposed updates to relfect current best 
practice will be put to a shareholder 
vote at the Annual General Meeting.

At each of its scheduled meetings the Board 
considered any updates to the principal 
and emerging risks of the Group, and in 
particular during 2023 considered the new 
risks facing the Group as a result of the 
ongoing Russian invasion and also changes 
to country-related risks. For further details, 
see pages 74 to 90 of the Strategic Report.

The Board is supported by the Executive 
Committee, which meets approximately 
monthly. All information submitted to the Board 
by management is reviewed and approved by 
the Executive Committee prior to submission.

Modern Slavery Act Statement
During the year, the Board reviewed and 
approved the Group’s Modern Slavery 
Act Statement for the year ended 
31 December 2022 (a copy of which 
is available at www.ferrexpo.com). 

Executive appointments and  
succession planning
Nikolay Kladiev was appointed as an 
Executive Director on 25 May 2023.

Lucio Genovese was appointed as Executive 
Chair on an interim basis on 1 July 2023.

For further details see page 123 of the 
Nominations Committee Report.

Other matters discussed were:

–  oral reports from the Chair of Board 
Committee meetings held before the 
Board meeting;

–  diversity and inclusion;
– 

internal succession planning – talent 
review;

–  succession planning for Non-executive 
Director recruitment and appointments;

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

– 

review of agenda and approval of minutes 
from previous Board meeting and note 
Board Committee minutes;
interactions with auditors;

– 
–  Executive Chair’s report including 

production and operations, iron ore market 
conditions, and updates on the Russian 
invasion of Ukraine and the position in 
Ukraine;
logistics update;

– 
–  update on DR growth markets;
–  Chief Financial Officer’s report including 
status vs. budget, forecasts, cash flow 
position, and funding update;
related party matters (including Directors’ 
interests/conflicts);
investor relations report (including 
shareholder feedback);

– 

– 

–  strategy, business plan and budget;
– 
formal risk review;
–  compliance matters; 
–  HSEC Committee matters, including 

Health and Safety, carbon reduction and 
community spending; and

–  Board refreshment, succession planning, 
Director independence and Committee 
composition.

Matters reviewed as required included:

– 

– 

the Group’s continued response to the 
Russian invasion of Ukraine and actions 
taken to protect the Group and its 
workforce;
review of half-year or annual results, going 
concern and viability, dividend policy and 
recommendations, investor presentation;

–  geopolitical matters;
– 

internal evaluation of the performance of 
the Board, Executive Chair, Directors and 
Company Secretary;
review of the AGM statement, and proxy 
agency comments and recommendations;

– 

–  annual review of bank relationships with 
the Group within and outside Ukraine;

–  annual review of the Treasury Policy;
–  approval of the 2022 Modern Slavery 

Statement; and
the CSR budget.

– 

During 2023, the Board also held sessions 
at which the relevant executive heads of 
department led detailed presentations on 
operations, finance, HR and management 
succession planning, sales and marketing, 
investor relations and communications.

109

Post AGM engagement
During the year, we consulted with 
shareholders in person and in writing on a 
number of important corporate governance 
issues, three of which were following 
significant votes against Resolutions 7, 11 
and 12 at the 2023 AGM (re-election of Vitalii 
Lisovenko, to authorise the directors to allot 
shares and to empower the directors to 
disapply pre-emption rights). Based on the 
feedback received, the Board understands 
that the votes against Vitalii Lisovenko arose 
as a result of concerns regarding certain 
historic corporate governance issues and 
the votes against resolutions 11 and 12 were 
primarily as a result of the Company’s largest 
shareholder not wanting to incur further 
dilution to its voting interest in the Company. 
The Company has since the AGM continued 
to engage with its largest shareholder in the 
ordinary course on a range of issues and 
will consult with the largest shareholder 
ahead of the 2024 AGM as to its position 
on the share allotment and disapplication 
of pre-emption rights resolutions. 

Board virtual site visit and  
Strategy Day
Due to travel restrictions resulting from the 
Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Board 
was unable to conduct the planned visit of 
the Group’s operations in Horishni Plavni, 
Ukraine. The alternative arrangement was 
a Board virtual site visit and Strategy Day. 

The Board received a progress update on 
actions taken from 2022 and noted the 
achievements and completion of all 2022 
actions during the year. 

The Board received presentations from 
executive management on:

Day 1
–  expected results and plan for 2024;
–  scenario planning for extended war and 

post-war preparation for Plant and Mining 
operations;

–  marketing scenario planning and 

alternative logistics;

–  organisational structure and Base Erosion 
and Profit Sharing requirements for 2024; 

–  ESG – Decarbonisation projects and 
Green Mining Electrification project 
update; and
Investor Relations – market engagement 
plans for 2023/24 given context of 
extended war.

– 

Day 2
– 

legal training for Directors from Legal 
advisers Herbert Smith Freehills.

The Board had a dedicated training session 
with its legal adviser Herbert Smith Freehills. 
This training session was held on Day 2 
of the Board Strategy Days in September 
2023 and covered key areas relevant to the 
Directors in responding to events facing 
the Group in Ukraine, including the seven 
statutory directors’ duties and actions which 
the Board may be able to take to protect the 
Group’s interest in Ukraine. Case studies 
of other mining and non-mining entities 
operating in a country at war or during a 
time of war were examined in detail. 

All matters discussed aligned with the Ferrexpo 
strategic pillars: Health and Safety, Financial 
Strength, Technology and Innovation, Product 
Quality, Growth and Licence to Operate.

The actions from the Strategy Day were 
collated and disseminated to the relevant 
executives for execution during the year.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
110

Corporate Governance Report continued

Board Evaluation

Board performance evaluation
Under the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Board is required to undertake annually a formal  
and rigorous evaluation of its own performance and that of its Committees and individual Directors.  
This evaluation should be externally facilitated every three years. 

Review of 2022 internal Board performance
The Board and its Committees consider their effectiveness regularly and the outcome and findings  
from the 2022 internal review were progressed throughout the year with the following actions taken: 

Board evaluation cycle

 2021: External

 2022: Internal

 2023: Internal

Action to be taken 

Actions taken

Board composition

The Board, with support from the Nominations Committee, continued its search for a Director 
from an ethnic minority background. Search agents were appointed and a number of candidates 
were selected for interview. The search continues.

Appointment of female Chair of HSEC Committee.

Due to Board changes, unfortunately female representation on the Board reduced from 43% in 
2022 to 29% as at 31 December 2023, although increased to 33% on 1 January 2024 following 
the resignation of a male director. 

Succession planning within 
the business and senior management 
including diversity

More females have been promoted during the year. To that end, the number of females in 
management roles (defined as roles that are grade 10 and above based on the Group’s internal 
grading system) increased by 1.4%, from 20.9% in 2022 to 22.3% in 2023. 

Balanced skill set 

Ensure Non-executive Directors 
continue to bring the right skill set 
and to balance the workload of the 
Board Committees

Explore ways to enhance workforce 
engagement and bring findings to the 
Boardroom

Overall, the number of females employed increased by 2.2%, from 28.7% in 2022 to 30.9% in 
2023.

The above outcomes are a result of the Group’s diversity programme targeting female 
representation and the lead programme for promoting gender diversity in management known  
as “Fe_munity” and the development of specific programmes designed to retain and promote 
females within the business, all of which are fully supported by the Board and senior 
management.

Following on from a wholesale refresh of the Board skills matrix in 2022, during the year the 
Board undertook a thorough review of the refreshed Board skills matrix and agreed that for the 
time being it is satisfactory and fit for purpose. A further review of the Board skills matrix will be 
undertaken in early 2024 to re-assess and address the skills matrix required particularly in light 
of the ongoing Board succession planning and the search for a director from an ethnic minority 
background.

During the year, the workload of the Board Committees was rebalanced with Ms MacAulay 
stepping down as a member of the Audit Committee on 1 August 2023 and the appointment of 
Ms Polischuk as Chair of the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee. Therefore, 
of the five Board Committees, 40% are chaired by females. 

The Board reviewed and changed the format of workforce engagement from large town hall 
sessions into smaller more intimate groups where individuals felt more comfortable to open up 
and raise matters. Members of the workforce welcomed the change in format which was 
reflected in their feedback of the event. Mr Lisovenko, Non-executive Director designate for 
workforce engagement, being resident in Ukraine, visited the workforce in December 2023 and 
provided feedback at the following scheduled Board meeting. 

Continue to improve Board reporting, 
particularly management report 
writing 

Board reporting has improved significantly with some key management reports streamlined.

Externally facilitated training among all report writers was not carried out due to other priorities 
arising from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but will be carried out in 2024, if possible. 

Corporate resourcing 

Increased resourcing in Secretariat needs to be completed.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

111

2023 Internal Board performance
During 2023, the annual performance evaluation of the Board and its Committees was carried out internally using a questionnaire led by the 
Group Company Secretary with external input from Clare Chalmers Ltd. The purpose was to build on the recommendations and areas identified 
from the externally facilitated evaluation in 2021.

The evaluation process involved the completion of questionnaires by Board and Committee members, with responses collated anonymously 
and analysed by Clare Chalmers Ltd together with the Group Company Secretary. 

The thematic evaluation focus areas included:

–  Board composition, including Executive Chair transition, succession, development, leadership and dynamics;
–  Board oversight: Strategy, performance, risk, people and culture;
–  stakeholders and decision making;
–  Board efficiency including secretarial support;
leadership and succession decision making;
– 
–  Board planning; and
– 

the effectiveness of Board Committees.

Preparation, questionnaire design and content, formal interviews and reporting:

–  Executive Chair and Group Company Secretary reviewed the 2022 recommendations and outcomes to set the 

scene for 2023.

PREPARATION

–  Executive Chair and Group Company Secretary held a scoping meeting to understand context and priorities.
–  Review of Board and Board Committee papers and other relevant documentation, including Strategy papers and 

the Board and Board Committee Forward Agenda Planner to identify key areas of focus.
Individual interviews were scheduled with the Senior Independent Director and all the Non-executive Directors.

– 

A comprehensive questionnaire was designed covering:

QUESTIONNAIRE 
DESIGN AND 
CONTENT

–  Board: Constitution and Commitment, Leadership, Efficiency of Board Process, Board’s role, Development, 

Stakeholders, of which there were 40 questions.

–  Audit Committee: Constitution and Commitment, Leadership, Efficiency of Committee Process, Committee’s role, 

Relationships, Development, of which there were 21 questions.

–  Remuneration Committee: Constitution and Commitment, Leadership, Efficiency of Committee Process, 

Committee’s role, Development, of which there were 20 questions.

–  Progress/Achievement of 2022 internal evaluation recommendations, of which there were six questions. 

FORMAL  
INTERVIEWS

–  Led by the Senior Independent Director, the other Directors also met without the Executive Chair present to 

evaluate the Executive Chair’s performance and, separately, the Senior Independent Director also evaluated the 
performance of the Directors.

–  The completed questionnaires were collated anonymously and analysed externally by Clare Chalmers Ltd together 

with the Group Company Secretary. 

REPORTING

–  Key findings and recommendations were shared with the Executive Chair, Senior Independent Director and Group 

Company Secretary, and a draft report was prepared for review.

–  The report was circulated to the Board and the feedback and comments from the questionnaires were discussed 

at a Board meeting, before deciding which recommendations to take forward.

The review also included feedback on individual performance. This informed the annual process of individual Director evaluation, led by the 
Senior Independent Director in place of the Executive Chair, which included one-to-one discussions with each Director on their performance, 
contribution and any additional training and development needs. The Senior Independent Director led the annual review of the Executive Chair, 
holding a one-to-one discussion to provide feedback on his performance. This was informed by a closed session of the Non-executive Directors, 
excluding the Executive Chair, led by the Senior Independent Director. The Senior Independent Director also engaged the Chief Financial Officer 
and Group Company Secretary to obtain their views on the Executive Chair’s performance.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
112

Corporate Governance Report continued

Board Evaluation (continued)

Feedback and report findings
The report was circulated to the Board and the feedback and comments from the questionnaires were discussed at a Board meeting, before 
deciding which recommendations to take forward. Led by the Senior Independent Director, the other Directors also met without the Executive 
Chair present to evaluate the Executive Chair’s performance and Senior Independent Director evaluated the performance of the Directors.

The questionnaire results demonstrated, despite the challenges associated with the war in Ukraine, progress has been made. Board members 
agreed that the transition from Chair to Executive Chair was well managed, the Board is working effectively with the correct skills and experience 
to support and to deal with challenges faced by the business; and that there is an open culture which responds well to constructive challenge. 

The Board has made progress over the past year, and there are some ideas on areas for development to ensure the Board works even more 
effectively. The evaluation process identified these development areas for focus in 2024. The Board will continue to consider and reflect on its 
composition and what may be required for a future Non-executive Director hire to include future roles, skills and Board diversity including gender 
and ethnicity. Issues are discussed and debated with full and frank discussions encouraged, and as the Board continues to develop, even further 
input to Board discussions would be welcome. More one-to-one meetings with the Executive Chair, Senior Independent Director and Board 
members could be used to discuss tailored individual development plans. The Executive Chair and Group Company Secretary will ensure 
appropriate time is allocated to all agenda topics.

The Board has considered the findings of the evaluation and, overall, the review concluded that the Board is well balanced in terms of Board 
dynamics but a further independent Non-executive Director would improve Board diversity. The Board is well led by a proactive and fully 
engaged Executive Chair. The environment in the boardroom encourages appropriate challenge and debate with no one voice dominating 
discussions. The Board and its Committees are well chaired and, except for the Nominations Committee which is run by the Executive Chair, run 
by committed Independent Non-executive Directors.

In response to the main recommendations of the evaluation report, the Board has agreed the following key areas for focus in 2024: 

Key areas for focus in 2024
Area

Board composition 

Succession planning

Actions to be taken

–  Continue to improve Board diversity in terms of ethnicity and gender. 

–  Embed sound succession planning within the business and senior management including 

diversity requirements.

Balanced skill set

–  Ensure Non-executive Directors continue to bring the right skill set and to balance the 

workload of the Board Committees, planning early for future skills and experience for Board 
succession.

Enhance workforce engagement

–  Continue to explore different ways to further enhance workforce engagement and bring 

Board efficiency and processes

findings into the Boardroom and to monitor culture and values in the organisation.

–  Continue to plan the agenda allowing appropriate time for the most important topics.
–  Consider an agenda slot at the end of some Board meetings for a wash-up session 

focusing on what went well and what could have gone better.

–  Consider a lessons learned exercise for the Board as well as a deep dive.

Corporate resourcing

–  Ensure bolstered resourcing for Secretariat. 

Long-term Incentive Plans

–  Continue to work on the LTIP measures and appropriateness.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

113

Board Training and Development

Training and professional 
development
The Executive Chair is responsible for agreeing 
training and development requirements 
with each Director to ensure they have the 
necessary skills and knowledge to continue 
to contribute effectively to the Board’s 
discussions. All Directors receive updates 
given to the Board as a whole on changes and 
proposed changes in laws and regulations 
affecting the Group, as and when necessary. 

During 2023, the Board had a dedicated 
training session with its legal adviser Herbert 
Smith Freehills. This training session was 
held on Day 2 of the Board Strategy Days 
in September 2023 and covered key areas 
relevant to the Directors in responding to 
events facing the Group in Ukraine, including 
the seven statutory directors’ duties and 
actions which the Board may be able to take 
to protect the Group’s interest in Ukraine. 
Case studies of other mining and non-mining 
entities operating in a country at war or during 
a time of war were examined in detail. 

Usually, site visits are held for the whole Board 
annually, so as to ensure that all Directors 
are familiar with the Group’s operations, and 
Directors may also visit the operations of 
the Group independently to the extent they 
feel this is necessary. Due to the ongoing 
conflict in Ukraine, the physical Board site 
visit was cancelled and replaced with a 
virtual site visit, as set out on page 109. 

All Directors may take independent 
professional advice at the expense of the 
Company in the furtherance of their duties.

Induction
Following appointment, all Directors are 
advised of their duties, responsibilities and 
liabilities as a director of a public listed 
company. In addition, an appropriate 
induction programme is provided to each 
Director upon appointment, taking into 
consideration the individual qualifications, 
experience and knowledge of the Director.

Induction training includes meeting senior 
executives of the Executive Committee, 
a detailed and structured site visit (or 
alternative arrangements, where required 
as a result of the ongoing conflict in 
Ukraine), meeting the Company Secretary, 
necessary training on corporate governance 
aspects, and receiving various key 
Company documentation and reports.

Mr Brown, who was appointed on 22 October 
2023, received director induction training 
in October 2023 and followed a tailored 
induction programme covering a range of 
key areas of the business. He met with the 
Company Secretary, who provided a Board 
Induction pack containing Company and 
Board information to assist with building an 
understanding of the nature and structure 
of the Group, its business and markets. The 
Board Induction pack also included information 
to help facilitate a thorough understanding 
of the role of a Director, the framework in 
which the Board operates, Group policies 
and procedures, constitutional documents 
and regulatory codes and guidelines. He 
also met with the Group’s external auditors, 
MHA, and with the Group’s legal advisers, 
Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF), to apprise him 
of some of the risks and legal challenges 
currently facing the Company. Mr Brown was 
also briefed by the Chief Financial Officer 
and Chief Human Resources Officer on the 
financial position of the Company and the 
Group’s risk management framework, as well 
as key issues related to the management 
of people and remuneration schemes.

In 2021, Ferrexpo introduced a Buddy 
programme for newly appointed Directors. 
The role of a Buddy is to provide mentoring 
for the first three months during orientation 
with the Company and its business. 
During the year, Mr Dacomb completed 
his Buddy duties for Mr Brown.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS114

Audit Committee Report

Focused on management’s going concern 
assessment while continuing to monitor the 
integrity of the financial results.

Stuart Brown
Chair of the Audit Committee 

Membership and  
meeting attendance

Scheduled meetings

Eligible  

Committee member

to attend

Attended

Graeme Dacomb 

Vitalii Lisovenko

Fiona MacAulay 

Natalie Polischuk

Stuart Brown

5

5

4

5

1

5

5

4

5

1

Dear Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to 
present the Audit Committee Report for 
the financial year ending 31 December 
2023. The aim of this report is to provide 
shareholders with insight into key areas that 
have been considered, how the Committee 
has discharged its responsibilities and lastly 
provide assurance on the integrity of the 
2023 Annual Report and Accounts.

The situation for the Group during the 
financial year 2023 continued to be strongly 
influenced by the ongoing war in Ukraine, 
which also led to a significantly increased 
involvement of the Committee to timely 
identify and analyse the additional risks in 
this unprecedented period for the Group.

The matters requiring increased involvement of 
the Committee were primarily the assessment 
of the Group’s going concern and viability 
in light of the material uncertainties, but 
also the considerations required when 
preparing the Group’s impairment test for 
its non-current operating assets as well as 
the escalation of a number of legal matters 
to be considered as a result of the change 
of the political environment in Ukraine. 

The Committee agenda focuses on audit, 
compliance and risk management within the 
Group, working closely with finance, external 

audit, internal audit and management. During the 
year, the Committee has robustly assessed the 
principal and emerging risks facing the business. 
The Committee throughout the year took into 
account the regular financial and internal audit 
reports made available to the Board, as well as 
discussing issues with management and the 
external auditors at intervals throughout the year.

As already disclosed for the Group Annual 
Report and Accounts for the financial years 
2022 and 2021, a critical area of focus for 
the Committee has been the going concern 
assessment itself and consequently the 
consideration of the preparation of the 
consolidated accounts on a going concern 
basis, considering the ongoing war in Ukraine 
and the circumstances under which the 
Group has to operate, including the political 
environment and the independence of the legal 
system in Ukraine. As at the date of the approval 
of these Consolidated Financial Statements, 
the war in Ukraine is still ongoing. Although the 
Group continued to demonstrate a high level 
of commitment and resilience enabling it to 
operate at a steady, but much lower capacity, 
the war continues to pose a significant threat 
to the Group’s mining, processing and logistics 
operations within Ukraine and represents a 
material uncertainty in terms of the Group’s 
ability to continue as a going concern.

Key activities of the Committee in 2023 

Key activities of the Audit Committee during 2023 are set out below.

February
–  Considered assumptions used for the going 

March
–  Received the Report of the auditors to the 

concern and viability assessments and 
impairment testing, including sensitivities and 
reverse stress tests.

–  Received an update on the progress of the 

2022 audit and analysed further work required.

Committee.

–  Reviewed letters of representation.
–  Reviewed the Audit opinion.
–  Reviewed the auditor’s Letter of Independence.
–  Reviewed the 2022 Annual Report and Financial 

–  Considered the draft Annual Report and 

Statements.

May
–  Received an update on 2022 audit follow up 

matters – Management letter points

–  Reviewed the auditors 2022 performance 
(Statutory Audit Service Order) – analysis 
of final detailed scores.

–  Reviewed 2023 audit planning, key dates and 

preliminary audit plan.

Accounts for 2022.

–  Reviewed the going concern assessment and 

–  Reviewed an update on 2022 recommendations 

–  Reviewed the questionnaire to be used to 

impairment test.

from Internal Audit.

assess the external auditor’s performance. 

–  Considered the going concern and viability 

–  Received an update on Cyber Security trends 

–  Reviewed Compliance Report including 

statements.

whistleblowing cases.

–  Reviewed the Group’s risk matrix and register.
–  Reviewed an update on the Directors’ Interests 

list and transactions with Related Parties.

–  Reviewed the Audit Committee 2023 

Forward Planner.

–  Received an update on Audit Reform.
–  Received an update on the FRC’s 

Audit Committee Minimum Standard 
consultation.

–  Held a private meeting with the auditors.

–  Discussed identified material uncertainties 

and assessment of mitigating actions.
–  Reviewed the Audit Committee Report.
–  Reviewed the auditors 2022 performance 
(Statutory Audit Service Order) – analysis 
of scores.

–  Reviewed the Compliance Report including 

whistleblowing cases.

–  Reviewed the Group’s risk matrix and register.
–  Held a private meeting with the auditors.

and proposed actions approved.
–  Received an update on Audit Reform.
–  Discussed the risk assurance map and new 

risk assurance platform

–  Reviewed a Compliance Report including 

whistleblowing cases.

–  Reviewed the Group’s risk matrix and register.
–  Reviewed an update on Directors’ Interests list 

and transactions with Related Parties.
–  Reviewed the Audit Committee 2023 

Forward Planner.

–  A private meeting with the auditors was held.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

115

In addition to the war-related material 
uncertainty, the Group is also exposed 
to the risks associated with operating in a 
developing economy, which may or may not 
be exacerbated by the war and/or the current 
circumstances facing the Group’s controlling 
shareholder (see Ukraine country risk on pages 
76 to 78). As a result, the Group is exposed 
to a number of risk areas that are heightened 
compared to those expected in a developed 
economy, such as an environment of political, 
fiscal and legal uncertainties, which represents 
another material uncertainty as at the date of 
the approval of these consolidated financial 
statements. The Committee had to address 
and assess also the risks related to a contested 
sureties claim in the amount of UAH4,727 million 
(US$124 million as at 31 December 2023) and 
the application to open bankruptcy proceedings 
(“creditor protection proceedings”) against the 
Group’s major subsidiary in Ukraine filed by 
a supplier and related party to the Group as 
an unfavourable outcome in these two cases 
might affect the Group’s ability to continue as a 
going concern. See Note 2 Basis of preparation 
and Note 30 Commitments, contingencies 
and legal disputes for further information.

As a result of the war, the local audit team in 
Ukraine could not be on-site and the required 
audit procedures have been performed 
remotely as it was done already for the 2022 
year-end audit. In terms of the audits on 
Group level, our external auditor MHA was 
on-site at our office in Baar and was able to 
complete its annual audit procedures for the 
preliminary and year-end audits as planned. 
Likewise, the Committee has been able to 
physically meet with both management and 
the auditors. The current situation in Ukraine 

required additional work from our external 
auditors, primarily in terms of the material 
uncertainty surrounding the Group’s going 
concern and viability assessment in light of 
the ongoing war, but also in relation to the 
escalation of the number of legal proceedings 
and disputes mainly as a result of the change 
of the political environment in Ukraine.

In addition to the war-related material 
uncertainty, the Group is also exposed 
to the risks associated with operating in 
a developing economy, which may or may 
not be exacerbated by the war and/or the 
current circumstances facing the Group’s 
controlling shareholder (see Ukraine country 
risk on pages 76 to 78). As a result, the 
Group is exposed to a number of risk areas 
that are heightened compared to those 
expected in a developed economy. 

During the year, the Committee continued 
to consider the status of the proposed 
regulatory change of the UK Government 
Consultation on ‘Restoring trust in audit 
and corporate governance: proposals on 
reforms’. The Committee reviewed the future 
potential impacts this could have on the 
Group as well as on the Committee in order 
to understand the latest developments and 
plan potential implications in a timely manner.

Increased TCFD disclosure requirements 
were also a focus for the Committee and 
environmental consultants Ricardo plc were 
involved to assist in enhancing the Group’s 
existing climate change reporting, scenario 
analysis and potential pathways to net zero 
iron ore pellet production. Through this 
work, Ricardo plc’s analysis has helped 
to enhance the Group’s carbon reduction 

targets, as announced in the Group’s 
Climate Change Report in December 
2023. However, considering the current 
situation in Ukraine and the challenging 
circumstances that are both outside of our 
control, we may also need to adjust our net 
zero targets and the way we report them.

During 2023 a life cycle analysis was completed 
on Ferrexpo DR pellets. The results show that 
the Ferrexpo DR pellet route (EAF) can reduce 
37% of embodied carbon emissions compared 
to the ‘traditional fossil based’ sinter-BF route 
for producing SAE 1006 grade steel. We are 
using this baseline result as a starting point 
to build on and address impact hotspots 
and further minimise our overall impact on 
climate change. This assessment was largely 
theoretical, so in 2024 the intention is to use this 
initial work for a more real scenario, namely, to 
model the emissions for blast furnace pellets 
sold to and processed to a large German 
customer. The Group was not required to do 
a follow up Climate Change Report in 2023, 
though the intention is to do one towards the 
end of 2024. This report will need to consider 
any changes in decarbonisation targets 
due to the ongoing war and in the inability 
to plan longer term at the current time. 

Detailed below is further information on the role, 
structure and key activities of the Committee 
and significant judgements it has considered in 
2023. I hope this additional information about 
the Committee and its activities is useful. 

Stuart Brown
Chair of the Audit Committee

Key activities of the Committee in 2023 

Key activities of the Audit Committee during 2023 are set out below.

July
–  Presentation and review of half-year accounts.
–  Reviewed the going concern assessment and 

impairment test. 

–  Considered the going concern statement.
–  Received auditor’s Review Report to the Audit 

Committee.

December
–  Received an update on TCFD and ESG double 

–  Received an update on proposed Audit Reform.
–  Reviewed a Compliance Report including 

materiality reporting.

–  Received a report on the outcome of the 

2022 Internal Audit plan and progress update 
on 2023.

–  Reviewed the preliminary Internal Audit plan 

whistleblowing cases.

–  Reviewed the Directors’ Interests list and 

transactions with Related Parties.

–  Reviewed the Group’s risk matrix and register. 
–  Reviewed the Audit Committee 2024 Forward 

Planner.

–  Received an update on Cyber Security and IT 

for 2024.

Security audit.

–  Considered the Group’s work plan for the 

–  Received an update on the ESG Disclosure 

2023 year end.

Audit.

–  Received an update on proposed Audit Reform.
–  Reviewed the Group’s risk matrix and register.
–  Reviewed the Director’s Interests list and 

transactions with Related Parties. 
Reviewed a Compliance Report, including 
whistleblowing cases.

–  Considered a report from the external auditors 
on progress of the preliminary audit for 2023.

–  Reviewed an external audit planning report.
–  Received an update on the 2024 internal 

audit plan.

–  Received a progress update on the 2023 internal 

audit matters.

–  Received an update on the planned process 

for the viability and going concern assessment.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS116

Audit Committee Report continued

Role of the Committee
The Committee’s objectives and 
responsibilities are set out in its terms of 
reference which are available to view on the 
Company’s website at ferrexpo.com. The 
Committee’s main responsibilities are:

–  Monitoring the integrity of the annual and 

interim financial statements and the 
accompanying reports to shareholders.
–  Making recommendations to the Board 

concerning the approval of the annual and 
interim financial statements.

–  Reviewing and monitoring the adequacy 
and effectiveness of the Group’s risk 
management and internal control 
mechanisms as well as in terms of the 
disclosures on the Group’s Principal Risks 
as contained on pages 74 to 90.

–  Approving the terms of reference of the 
internal audit function and assessing its 
effectiveness.

–  Approving the Internal Audit plan and 

receiving regular reports from the Group’s 
Head of Internal Audit.

–  Overseeing the Group’s relations with the 
external auditor, including an assessment 
of their independence, effectiveness and 
objectivity.

–  Overseeing completion of the Group’s 

going concern and viability assessment 
and statements thereon.

–  Reviewing and monitoring the Group’s 
whistleblowing procedures and the 
Group’s systems and controls for the 
prevention of bribery and corruption.

During the year ended 31 December 2023, 
the Committee has ensured that it has had 
oversight of all these areas listed. The Board 
also asked the Committee to advise it as to 
whether the Annual Report and Accounts are 
fair, balanced and understandable and 
provide the information necessary for 
shareholders to assess the Group’s position, 
performance, business model and strategy.

Committee membership 
and attendance
On 1 August 2023 Fiona MacAulay stepped 
down as a member of the Committee.

As at the year end, the Committee comprised 
four Independent Non-executive Directors:

–  Graeme Dacomb (Chair of the Committee);
–  Vitalii Lisovenko; 
–  Natalie Polischuk; and
–  Stuart Brown

Stuart Brown joined the Committee in 
October 2023 and was appointed Chair of the 
Committee with effect from 1 January 2024. 
In addition to the five meetings held in 2023, 
the Audit Committee has met twice to date 
in 2024. All members of the Committee are 
considered to possess appropriate knowledge 
and skills relevant to the activities of the 
Group, and Stuart Brown has recent and 
relevant financial experience. See page 99 of 
the Corporate Governance section regarding 
his skills, expertise and contributions.

In addition to its members, other individuals 
and external advisers, and the Executive 
Chair of the Board, may be invited to 
attend meetings of the Committee at the 
request of the Committee Chair. Regular 
attendees at meetings include the Chief 
Financial Officer, Group Financial Controller, 
Group Company Secretary and audit 
partners of our external auditor MHA. The 
Committee has an opportunity to meet 
with the external auditors at the end of its 
scheduled meetings, without the Executive 
Director or management being present.

Significant issues and judgements
The significant issues and judgements considered by the Committee in respect of the 2023 Annual Report and Accounts are set out below:

Judgements/actions taken

The ongoing war in Ukraine continues to pose a significant threat to the Group’s mining, processing and logistics operations, despite the fact that continued 
to demonstrate a high level of commitment and resilience enabling it to operate at a steady, but at a much lower capacity

The war related material uncertainty is predominantly related to the provision and availability of logistics capacity required for the production and delivery of the 
Group’s products to customers in its key markets, subject to the availability of Black Sea ports in Ukraine. As in the previous financial year, the Group had to 
adjust during the financial year 2023 its production level to the sales currently possible, which continues to have an impact on the Group’s cash flow generation 
and profitability.

Despite the unprecedented and challenging situation, the Group’s net cash position has remained stable at US$108 million, compared to US$106 million 
as at 31 December 2022. As at the date of the approval of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the Group is in a net cash position of approximately 
US$91 million with an available cash balance of approximately US$96 million. In addition to the available cash balance, the Group has an outstanding trade 
receivable balance of approximately US$49 million from its pellet and concentrate sales in January and February 2024, which are expected to be collected 
in the next few months.

As mentioned above, the Group is exposed to a number of risk areas that are heightened compared to those expected in a developed economy, such as 
an environment of political, fiscal and legal uncertainties, which require a significant portion of critical judgements to be made by the management, mainly in 
respect of a contested sureties claim in the amount of UAH4,727 million (US$124 million as at 31 December 2023, which required specific consideration also 
from a going concern perspective. See Note 30 Commitments, contingencies and legal disputes for further details, also in respect of the high degree of 
management judgement required, in respect of the potential impact of seizure of assets in respect of the contested sureties claim.

The Audit Committee has reviewed the key assumptions used for the Group’ long-term model, which forms the basis for the management’s going concern 
assessment. The key assumptions have been adjusted to reflect the latest developments in terms of currently possible sales volumes as well as latest market 
prices and production costs, which are adversely affected by lower production volumes. As in the previous long-term model in 2022, the production volume is 
currently aligned to the possible sales volume in order to maintain a solid net cash position. The latest base case of the long-term model shows that the Group 
has sufficient liquidity to continue its operations at a reduced level for the entire period of the management’s going concern assessment, even allowing for 
reasonably possible or plausible adverse changes in respect of realised prices, lower production and sales volumes as well as higher production costs.

However, as mentioned above, the production and sales volumes are heavily dependent on the logistics network available to the Group and the determination 
of the key assumptions requires a significant level of management estimation. 

The Audit Committee has also reviewed the Group’s reverse stress tests reflecting more severe adverse changes, such as a combination of all reasonably 
possible or plausible adverse changes in respect of realised prices, lower production and sales volumes as well as higher production costs, which is unlikely to 
happen in combination as a result of the natural hedge of iron ore prices and prices for key input materials. Based on the stress tests performed, it is expected 
that the Group would have sufficient liquidity for up to 12 months before making use of any available mitigating actions within its control, such as further 
reductions of uncommitted development capital expenditures and operating costs.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

117

Judgements/actions taken

However, as at the date of the approval of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the Group has assessed that, taking into account:

– 
– 

– 
– 

its available cash and cash equivalents;
its cash flow projections, adjusted for the effects caused by the war in Ukraine, for the period of the management’s going concern assessment covering 
a period of 18 months from the date of the approval of these Consolidated Financial Statements; 
the feasibility and effectiveness of all available mitigating actions within the Group management’s control for identified uncertainties; and
the legal merits in terms of the ongoing legal disputes mentioned above and potential future actions available to protect the interests of the Group in case 
of a negative decision from the Supreme Court of Ukraine and other courts in Ukraine;

there is a material uncertainty in respect of the ongoing war and the legal disputes, as some of the uncertainties remain outside of the Group management’s 
control, with the duration and the impact of the war still unable to be predicted, and the uncertainty remains in relation to independence of the judicial system 
and its immunity from economic and political influences in Ukraine.

In respect of the contested sureties claim mentioned above, no enforcement procedures have commenced as at the date of the approval of these consolidated 
financial statements, however the commencement of such procedures may be initiated by the claimant anytime between this approval and the date of the 
expected hearing by the Supreme Court. The commencement of the enforcement procedures could have a material negative impact on the Group’s business 
activities and its ability to continue as a going concern.

The Group’s Principal Risks section on pages 74 to 90 provided further information on the Ukrainian country risk to which the Group is seriously exposed, 
including the conflict risk and the risks related to operating in a developing economy.

Considering the current situation of the war in Ukraine, the Group’s ability to swiftly adapt to the changing circumstances caused by the war, as demonstrated 
during the financial years 2023 and 2022, and the results of the management’s going concern assessment, the Group continues to prepare its consolidated 
financial statements on a going concern basis. However, many of the identified uncertainties are outside of the Group management’s control, such as the 
duration and severity of potential threats, and are unpredictable, which may cast significant doubt upon the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

See Note 2 Basis of preparation to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 176 for further information.

The Committee also considered management’s analysis of the impact of the war in Ukraine on the Group’s viability. Although the Group has managed to 
continue its operations since the beginning of the war, the war continues to pose a significant threat to the Group’s mining, processing and logistics operations 
within Ukraine. The Committee concurs with management’s conclusion that, notwithstanding all of the available mitigating actions, a material uncertainty still 
remains as some of the identified uncertainties are outside of Group Management’s control. See Viability Statement on pages 91 to 92 for further information. 

Impairment considerations of the Group’s non-current operating assets as a result of the war (Note 13 to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements)
The ongoing war continues to have an adverse impact on the Group’s production and cash flow generation and it is expected that this will continue to be the 
case until the war comes to an end. Throughout 2023, the continued unavailability of the Port of Pivdennyi in Ukraine had a significant adverse impact on the 
Group’s seaborne sales and consequently on its cash flow generation. 

A number of significant judgements and estimates are used when preparing the Group’s financial long-term model, which are, together with the key 
assumptions used, reviewed by the Audit Committee. The Group’s long-term model is based on management’s best estimate of reasonably conservative key 
assumptions, taking also into account the current circumstances the Group has to operate in. Due to the continued restriction of the logistics network in 
Ukraine, the production volume is aligned to the possible sales volume. Further information on the key assumptions used are disclosed in Note 13 Property, 
plant and equipment. 

Based on the base case of the Group’s impairment test prepared for the 2023 year-end accounts, there is no additional impairment loss on the Group’s single 
cash generating unit’s operating non-current assets, including property, plant and equipment as well as other intangibles assets and other non-current assets, 
to be recognised as at 31 December 2023.

The Committee is aware that the level of judgement significantly increased, compared to the years before the war commenced. Beside the normal judgement 
in terms of production and sales volumes, anticipated prices for iron ore products and costs for input material, the outcome of the impairment test is also 
heavily dependent on when the war is expected to end. The production capacity used for the base-case cash flow projection is expected to be approximately 
45% of the pre-war level for the financial year 2024, before an increase to approximately 80% in 2025 and an expected recovery to pre-war levels in 2026.

As mentioned above, the preparation of the long-term model and the impairment testing in these unprecedented times involves a high degree of judgement 
and any adverse changes in key assumptions would further reduce the value in use of the Group’s operating non-current assets. Based on the sensitivities 
prepared, a delay of the recovery of the production and sales volumes to a pre-war level by another year, with all other assumptions remaining unchanged, 
would reduce the value in use of the Group’s non-current operating assets by approximately another US$326 million A reduction of the realised price by 
US$5 per tonne for each year until 2048 would increase the impairment loss by approximately US$171.6 million and a decrease of the production and sales 
volume by 10%, combined with an increase of the production costs by 5%, again for the entire period, would increase the impairment loss by approximately 
US$196.8 million whereas every 1.0% increase of the nominal pre-tax discount rate would increase the impairment loss by approximately US$52.6 million, with 
all other assumptions remaining unchanged. The recorded impairment during the financial year 2022 is to be reassessed at the end of any future reporting 
periods. If there are positive developments in the Group’s future cash flow generation and the relevant macro-economic data, a portion of the impairment loss 
might reverse in future periods. As at 31 December 2023, there is no partial or full reversal of the impairment loss recognised during the financial year 2022 to 
be recorded.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS118

Audit Committee Report continued

Judgements/actions taken

Taxation in general and tax legislation in Ukraine (Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
The Group operates across a number of jurisdictions through its value chain and prices its sales between its subsidiaries using international benchmark 
prices for comparable products covering product quality and applicable freight costs. The Group judges these to be on terms which comply with applicable 
legislation in the jurisdictions in which the Group operates. The pricing of cross-border transactions is an inherent risk for any multinational group and regular 
audits are to be expected. On 18 February 2020, the State Tax Service of Ukraine (“STS”), formerly known as SFS, commenced two tax audits for cross-border 
transactions between the Group’s major subsidiary in Ukraine and two subsidiaries of the Group outside of Ukraine in relation to the sale of iron ore products 
during the financial years 2015 to 2017. Further to that, on 14 June 2021, the STS commenced another tax audit for the financial years 2015 to 2017 for 
cross-border transactions of another Ukrainian subsidiary with the same two subsidiaries of the Group outside of Ukraine. 

The tax audits have been completed in the second half of the financial year 2023 and the Group’s two major subsidiaries in Ukraine received the tax audit 
reports on stating potential claims for underpayment of corporate profit taxes in Ukraine of UAH2,162 million (US$56.9 million as at 31 December 2023), 
including fines and penalties, and UAH259 million (US$6.8 million as at 31 December 2023), including fines and penalties, respectively. Both subsidiaries 
filed the objections against the potential claims stated in the tax audit reports received. 

Despite the two claims received, it is still management’s view that the Group has complied with the applicable legal provisions in all its cross-border 
transactions based on the relevant technical grounds, including those during the financial years 2015 to 2017 for which substantial claims have been received.

Having considered the background of the claims the Committee shares management’s view that the Group has complied with applicable legislation for its 
cross-border transactions based on the relevant technical grounds. As a consequence, no provision has been recognised as at 31 December 2023 for the 
two specific claims received as these claims will have to be heard by the courts in Ukraine. However, the Committee is aware that there is a risk that the 
independence of the judicial system and its immunity from economic and political influences in Ukraine is not upheld and if so the Group could be subject to 
material financial exposures relating to the tax audits.

Completeness of contingencies and legal disputes (Note 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
The Committee is aware that the Group is, in addition to the war-related uncertainties described under Assessment of the Group’s going concern and viability 
statements on page 91, also exposed to the risks associated with operating in a developing economy, which may or may not be exacerbated by the war and/or 
the current circumstances facing the Group’s controlling shareholder. As a result, the Group is exposed to a number of risk areas that are heightened 
compared to those expected in a developed economy, including an environment of political, fiscal and legal uncertainties. 

As disclosed in the 2022 Annual Report and Accounts and 2023 Interim Results, one of the Group’s major subsidiaries in Ukraine, Ferrexpo Poltava Mining 
(“FPM”), received in December 2022 a claim in the amount of UAH4,727 million (US$124 million as at 31 December 2023) in respected of contested sureties. 
In respect of this claim, the Group announced on 29 January 2024 that a Ukrainian court of appeal has confirmed the afore-mentioned claim against FPM in 
full (see Note 30 Commitments, contingencies and legal disputes for further details). The claim and court decision received is another example of operating in 
a dynamic and adverse political landscape in Ukraine, which creates additional challenges for the Group’s subsidiaries in Ukraine, but also for the Group itself. 

In accordance with the requirements of IAS 37 Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets, the management proposed to record a full provision for 
the contested sureties claim in the amount of US$124 million. The Committee reviewed the position paper of management addressing possible accounting 
implications, such as the recognition of a provision under the relevant accounting standard, but also on the Group’s going concern assessment. Considering 
the magnitude of this specific claim, the Committee concurred with management that a full provision for this ongoing legal dispute is to be recognised as at 
31 December 2023 and that this dispute represents another material uncertainty in terms of the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

A provision for the full amount is to be recognised as at 31 December 2023 as the decision of the court of appeal constitutes a legal obligation in accordance 
with the relevant accounting standard, despite the fact that FPM filed on 30 January 2024 a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court of Ukraine, and that the 
probability of a potential future outflow of resources is outside of the Group’s control. It is still management’s view that FPM has compelling arguments to 
defend its position in the Supreme Court of Ukraine as this claim is without substance and legal merits, but there is a risk that the independence of the judicial 
system and its immunity from economic and political influences in Ukraine is not upheld. See Note 30 Commitments, contingencies and legal disputes for 
further details, also in respect of the high degree of management judgement required, in respect of the potential impact of seizure of assets in respect of the 
contested sureties claim.

In addition to the contested sureties claim, the Group recognised also a provision over UAH136 million (US$4 million) for a challenge from two minority 
shareholders of FPM in respect of a challenge of squeeze-out procedures of minority shareholders commenced and completed during the financial year 2019.

The Group is currently involved in the following other ongoing legal proceedings and disputes, which are disclosed in full detail in Note 30 Commitments, 
contingencies and legal disputes to the Consolidated Financial Statements:

royalty-related investigation and claim;
investigations on use of waste product;

–  share dispute related to the Group’s major subsidiary in Ukraine;
– 
– 
–  currency control measures imposed in Ukraine;
–  ecological claims; and
–  cancellation of licence for Galeschynske deposit.

As mentioned above, the Group is operating in a developing economy and most of the matters to be considered by the Committee are seen to be a result 
of operating in such an environment. As at the date of the approval of these consolidated financial statements, no enforcement procedures have been 
commenced and on 1 April 2024 the Supreme Court of Ukraine suspended the possible enforcement of the decision of the Ukrainian court of appeal, so 
that such enforcement procedures cannot be initiated by the claimant until a final decision is made by the Supreme Court of Ukraine, or the Supreme Court’s 
suspension order is otherwise lifted. If the final ruling of the Supreme Court is not in favour of the FPM, the claimant may take steps to appoint either a state 
or a private bailiff and request the commencement of the enforcement procedures, which could have a material negative impact on the Group’s business 
activities and its ability to continue as a going concern, as the assets of FPM could be seized or subject to a forced sale.

Following the thorough review of management’s position and legal advice received for the matters listed above, the Committee concluded that the disclosures 
made in Note 30 Commitments, contingencies and legal disputes to the Consolidated Financial Statements provide an adequate level of detail to allow the 
reader of the accounts to understand the potential consequences and the related exposure. The Committee also concurs with management’s view that no 
additional provisions have to be recognised for other ongoing legal proceedings and disputes in the consolidated statement of financial position as at 
31 December 2023. 

Events after the reporting period (Note 35 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
The following two events after the reporting period are summarised below.

As disclosed in Note 30 Commitments, contingencies and legal disputes, the Group received two negative decisions from courts of appeal 
in Ukraine in respect of ongoing legal proceedings and disputes that commenced already during the financial year 2023. As a result of these 
negative court decisions, the Group recognised provisions in the amount of US$124 million for a contested sureties claim and US$3.7 million in 
relation to a claim from two former shareholders of one of the Group’s Ukrainian subsidiaries in respect of a squeeze-out of minority shareholders.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

119

Internal control and risk 
management

Internal controls – general
The Board, with assistance from the 
Committee, regularly reviews the policies 
and procedures making up the internal 
control and risk management system, and 
any significant matters reported by the 
Executive Committee. The risk register is 
considered at every scheduled Board and 
Committee meeting, with specific risks 
discussed in detail as and when required.

The Board has delegated its responsibility 
for reviewing the effectiveness of the internal 
control and risk management system to 
the Committee. In making its assessment, 
the Committee considers the reporting 
provided to it during the year in relation to 
internal control systems and procedures, 
including the risk matrix and register, and 
may request more detailed investigations 
into specific areas of concern if appropriate.

Key elements of the internal control and 
risk management system include:

–  The Group has in place a series of policies, 
practices and controls in relation to the 
financial reporting and consolidation 
processes, which are designed to address 
key financial reporting risks, including risks 
arising from changes in the business or 
accounting standards and to provide 
assurance of the completeness and 
accuracy of the content of the Annual 
Report and Accounts.

–  Regular review of risk and identification 
of key risks at the Executive Committee 
which are reviewed by the Committee and 
by the Board.

–  The FRMCC, an executive sub-committee, 
is charged, on behalf of the Executive 
Committee or Committee, as appropriate, 
with ensuring that, inter alia, systems and 
procedures are in place to comply with 
laws, regulations and ethical standards. 
The Group Compliance Officer attends 
FRMCC meetings, and, as necessary, 
local compliance officers from the Group’s 
operations, attend and present regular 
reports to ensure that the FRMCC is given 
prior warning of regulatory changes and 
their implications. The FRMCC enquires 
into the ownership of potential suppliers 
deemed to be “high risk”, and oversees 
the management of conflicts of interests 
below Board level and general compliance 
activities (including under the UK Bribery 
Act, the Modern Slavery Act, the Criminal 
Finances Act, and the EU General Data 
Protection Regulation). The FRMCC also 
reviews financial information, management 
accounts, taxation, cash management, 
risk including counterparty risk, the risk 
register and third party risks. The FRMCC 
met ten times in 2023.

–  Clearly defined organisational and 

reporting structure and limits of authority 
for transaction and investment decisions, 
including any with related parties.

–  Clearly defined processes for the review 
and approval of related party listings and 
transactions and appropriate review and 
approval from the Committee of 
Independent Directors and the Executive 
Related Party Matters Committee 
(“ERPMC”). Additional procedures are in 
place locally to ensure the completeness 
and the arm’s length nature of related 
party transactions, such as background 
checks and tender processes. The 
ERPMC met nine times in 2023.

–  Clearly defined information and financial 
reporting systems, including regular 
forecasts and an annual budgeting 
process with reporting against key 
financial and operational milestones.
Investment appraisal underpinned by 
the budgetary process, where capital 
expenditure limits are applied to delegated 
authority limits.

– 

–  The Investment Committee (an executive 

sub-committee) meets as required in order 
to consider and approve capital 
expenditures within limits delegated by the 
Executive Committee and the Board. The 
Investment Committee did not meet in 
2023 as no investment decisions were 
required since the onset of the war.
–  A budgetary process and authorisation 
levels to regulate capital expenditure. 
For expenditure beyond specified levels, 
detailed written proposals are submitted to 
the Investment Committee and Executive 
Committee and then, if necessary, to the 
Board for approval.

–  Clearly defined Treasury Policy (details of 
which are given in Note 27 Financial 
instruments to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements on pages 211 and 212), which 
is monitored and applied in accordance 
with pre-set limits for investment and 
management of the Group’s liquid 
resources, including a separate treasury 
function.
Internal audit by our in-house audit team 
based in Ukraine (see below), which 
monitors, tests and improves internal 
controls operating within the Group at all 
levels and reports directly to the Chair of 
the Committee, and to the Group CFO for 
line management purposes.

– 

–  A standard accounting manual is used by 
the finance teams throughout the Group, 
which ensures that information is gathered 
and presented in a consistent way that 
facilitates the production of the 
Consolidated Financial Statements.

–  A framework of transaction and entity-level 
controls to prevent and detect material 
error and loss.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

–  Anti-fraud measures through an internal 
security department operating in the 
Company’s key operating subsidiaries.
–  A whistleblowing policy is in place under 
which staff may in confidence, via an 
independent, secure website, raise 
concerns about financial or other 
impropriety, which are followed up 
by Internal Audit and reported on to 
the Board.

The Committee and the Board continued 
to review ongoing litigation affecting the 
Group throughout the year (see Note 30 
Commitments, contingencies and legal 
disputes to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements on pages 217 to 223), 
and received regular update reports and 
presentations from legal counsel.

Full details of the Group’s policy on credit, 
liquidity and market risks and associated 
uncertainties are set out in Note 27 Financial 
instruments to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements on pages 211 to 215. See also the 
Principal Risks section of the Strategic Report 
on page 72.

Internal audit
The internal audit function has a Group-wide 
remit, and the Head of Internal Audit (who has 
mining experience) reports directly to the Chair 
of the Committee and to the Group CFO.

The Committee reviews at least annually the 
effectiveness of the internal audit function by 
assessing outcomes against plan targets, and 
is satisfied, following its 2023 assessment, 
with the rigour of the internal audits and with 
management’s response to the audit findings 
and recommendations. The resources of 
internal audit are also monitored to ensure 
appropriate expertise and experience. An 
Internal Audit plan for 2024 was approved 
by the Committee in December 2023.

The Internal Audit plan for 2023 was approved 
by the Audit Committee. The full scope 
audits focused on the operations cycle, 
Griding bodies for FPM, procurement cycle 
for FYM, operational risks relating to Group 
sales for FAG, FME and FBM, Treasury cycle 
(financial controls) for FAG, FME and FBM, 
FPM Purchasing and Inventory Management 
– RM and MRO, DP Ferrotrans and First 
DDSG Logistics Holding GmbH. A limited 
scope review of the Ferrexpo Humanitarian 
Fund in Ukraine. The Committee received a 
report from the Head of Internal Audit twice 
during the year, and reviewed the progress 
of the Internal Audit plan with the external 
auditors and the Head of Internal Audit. 
The reports include the Head of Internal 
Audit’s assessment of the operation and 
effectiveness of relevant elements of the 
Company’s internal control systems, and 
formed part of the Committee’s ongoing 
monitoring and assessment of such systems.

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe Committee has also conducted its own 
detailed review of the disclosures in the Annual 
Report and Accounts, taking into account 
its own knowledge of Group’s strategy and 
performance, the consistency between 
different sections of the report, the accessibility 
of the structure and narrative of the report, 
and the use of key performance indicators.

The Committee is satisfied that, taken 
as a whole, the 2023 Annual Report 
and Accounts is fair, balanced and 
understandable and that it provides the 
information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Company’s position, 
performance, business model and strategy, 
and has advised the Board accordingly.

The Committee has also advised the Board 
on the process which has been undertaken 
in the year to support the longer-term 
Viability Statement required under the UK 
Corporate Governance Code. The Viability 
Statement is set out in the Strategic Report 
on page 91 and a statement setting out 
the Board’s assessment of the Company 
as a going concern is contained in the 
Directors’ Report on page 155 and Note 2 
Basis of preparation to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements on page 176.

Whistleblowing policy
In accordance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code, the Board is 
responsible for reviewing the Company’s 
whistleblowing arrangements, and 
receives regular reports from the Audit 
Committee and the Head of Internal Audit 
which detail any new whistleblowing 
incidents and, where appropriate, steps 
taken to investigate such incidents.

Stuart Brown
Chair of the Audit Committee
17 April 2024

120

Audit Committee Report continued

External audit

Auditor independence and assessment 
of audit process effectiveness
The Audit Committee and the Board place 
great emphasis on the independence 
and objectivity of the Company’s external 
auditors when performing their role in the 
Company’s reporting to shareholders.

The effectiveness of the audit process and 
the overall performance, independence 
and objectivity of the external auditors are 
reviewed annually at the end of the annual 
reporting cycle by the Committee, taking 
into account the views of management. This 
review is undertaken through a structured 
questionnaire, assessing the auditor’s 
performance under various headings: the 
robustness of the audit, the quality of delivery, 
the calibre of the audit team and value added 
advice. The results of the survey indicated that, 
overall, the external auditor’s performance 
was considered very good by the respondees 
with significant improvement in the scores 
from respondees in Ukraine. A couple of 
areas for improvement were noted but none 
impacted on the effectiveness of the audit. 
The outcome of the 2023 review in respect of 
the 2022 Annual Report and Accounts was 
discussed with the relevant partners of MHA.

The auditors also provide to the Committee 
information about policies and processes for 
maintaining independence and monitoring 
compliance with relevant current requirements, 
including those regarding the rotation of 
audit partners and staff, and the level of 
fees that the Company pays in proportion 
to the overall fee income of the firm. The 
Committee concluded that the auditors are 
providing the required quality in relation to 
the audit and that they have constructively 
challenged management where appropriate.

Taking into account the review of 
independence and performance of the external 
auditor, the Committee has recommended 
to the Board the reappointment of MHA. 
Resolutions reappointing MHA as external 
auditor and authorising the Directors to set 
the auditor’s remuneration will be proposed 
at the 2024 AGM. The Company notes that 
as of the end of the financial year 2023, the 
Company has engaged MHA as external 
auditor for five consecutive financial years. In 
light of the material uncertainty related to the 
ongoing war in Ukraine, the Committee does 
not consider it to be the right time, or in the 
best interests of the Company’s shareholders, 
to conduct a competitive tender process for 
the external audit. The Company proposes 
that it will next complete a competitive 
tender process during financial year 2027, 
subject to the situation in Ukraine having 
stabilised by that time. The Committee will 
continue to keep this position under review.

The Company has complied with the 
Statutory Audit Services Order issued by 
the UK Competition and Markets Authority 
Authority and with the Audit Committees 
and the External Audit: Minimum Standard 
published by the FRC in May 2023 for the 
financial year ended 31 December 2023.

There is regular open communication 
between the Committee and the external 
auditor, and the Committee met five times 
during the year. The Committee meets 
at least once a year with the external 
auditors without any representation 
from management being present.

Non-audit services
The Committee operates policies in respect 
of the provision of non-audit services and 
the employment of former employees of 
the auditors. These policies ensure that the 
external auditors are restricted to providing 
only those services which do not compromise 
their independence under applicable 
guidance and the FRC’s Ethical Standards. 

The policy on the provision of non-audit 
services prohibits the use of the auditors 
for the provision of transaction or payroll 
accounting, outsourcing of internal audit 
and valuation of material financial statement 
amounts. Any assignment that is proposed 
to be given to the auditors above a value 
of US$20,000 must first be approved by 
the Committee (and the Committee is 
routinely notified of all non-audit services). 

Fees for audit-related and non-audit-related 
services performed by the external auditors 
during 2022 are shown in Note 7 Operating 
expenses to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements on page 184. For 2023, no material 
non-audit services were performed by MHA.

Audit-related assurance services as at 
31 December 2023 include US$63 thousand 
regarding ESG-related disclosures in 
the Annual Report and Accounts under 
International Standard on Assurance 
Engagements ISAE (UK) 3000 (Revised) 
in respect of the process for reporting of 
selected safety and emissions data.

Financial reporting
The Board has asked the Committee to 
advise whether it considers the 2023 Annual 
Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, 
to be fair, balanced and understandable 
and that it provides the information 
necessary for shareholders to assess 
the Company’s position, performance, 
business model and strategy.

In providing its advice, the Committee noted 
that the factual content of the Annual Report 
and Accounts has been carefully checked 
internally, and that the document has been 
reviewed by senior management in order 
to ensure consistency and overall balance. 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Nominations Committee Report

121

The Committee is chaired by Lucio 
Genovese. The Committee consists of 
four Independent Non-executive Directors 
and, by invitation, is also attended by the 
Chief Human Resources Officer.

Dear Shareholder,
I am pleased to present the Nominations 
Committee Report for 2023 and provide a 
summary of the work that the Committee 
completed in the reporting year. The role of 
the Nominations Committee is to assist the 
Board in regularly reviewing its composition 
and those of its Committees, to lead the 
process for Board appointments, and ensure 
effective succession planning for the Board 
and senior management. The key activities 
undertaken in the year are described in more 
detail in this report. The Committee’s terms of 
reference are available to view online on the 
Company’s website (www.ferrexpo.com).

In 2023, the Committee was formally 
convened four times (2022: three) where the 
following was considered: 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

the composition and refreshment of the 
Board;
training and developing needs to ensure 
Board effectiveness;
reviewing and making recommendations 
as to the composition of the Board and its 
Committees in order to maintain a diverse 
Board with the appropriate mix of skills, 
experience, independence and 
knowledge;
the criteria for Non-executive and 
Executive Director appointments; 
reviewing and making recommendations 
as to the composition and diversity of the 
Board, Executive Committee and direct 
reports to Executive Committee members;
the engagement of executive search 
agencies to assist with Board 
appointments; 
reviewing candidates and making 
recommendations to the Board for the 
appointment of Nikolay Kladiev as an 
Executive Director, and the appointment of 
Stuart Brown as independent Non-
executive Director; 

–  approving actions to be taken in 2023 in 

– 

support of the achievement of the Group’s 
diversity and inclusion goals; and
reviewing the results of the Group’s annual 
talent review and succession plans for 
business critical roles.

The Committee also agreed to undertake an 
internal performance evaluation for the year to 
31 December 2023 (for further information 
see the Board’s Performance Evaluation on 
pages 110 to 112). The Company will conduct 
an external performance evaluation in 2024.

On 25 May 2023, Ann-Christin Andersen 
stood down from the Board as an independent 
Non-executive Director and as a member 
of the Committee. I would like to take this 
opportunity to acknowledge and thank her 
for the contribution she made to the work 
of the Board and the Committee while she 
served on both. Following her departure, 
a decision was taken to not replace her 
on the Committee in view of the workload 
already being undertaken by other Board 
members. The composition of the Committee 
will be revisited in the course of 2024.

The leadership of the Company was also 
restructured during 2023. Jim North, the 
Chief Executive Officer, resigned and left the 
Company at the end of June 2023. As a result 
of Mr North’s departure, Lucio Genovese 
assumed the role of Interim Executive Chair 
from 1 July 2023 and Nikolay Kladiev was 
promoted to the Board in the role of Chief 
Financial Officer with effect from the 2023 
AGM. These leadership changes ensured 
business continuity within an operating 
structure that enables timely decision making 
in what is a dynamic operating environment.

The Board places great importance on 
creating a workplace culture in which 
all contributions are valued, different 
perspectives are embraced, and so far as 
possible biases are acknowledged and 
mitigated. This commitment is set out in the 
Company’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion 
policy, which was adopted by the Board in 
2019. The Committee therefore continued 
to make recommendations to the Board 
on appointments to the Board and the 
Executive Committee as well as monitor 
senior appointments below the Executive 
Committee. The execution of these plans will 
remain a focus for the Committee to eliminate 
gender imbalances below the Board.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Lucio Genevese
Chair of the Nominations Committee

Membership and  
meeting attendance

Scheduled meetings

Eligible  

Committee member

to attend Attended

Lucio Genovese 

Ann-Christin Andersen

Graeme Dacomb

Vitalii Lisovenko

Fiona MacAulay

4

2

4

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

Read the Committee’s full objectives 
and responsibilities online: www.
ferrexpo.com/about-ferrexpo/corporate-
governance/board-committees/

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS122

Nominations Committee Report continued

Since the inception of the “Fe_munity” 
programme three years ago, more than 200 
women have been through the programme 
and the Committee was pleased to note that 
in 2023, progress continued to be made 
towards achieving gender balance across 
the Group. The proportion of managerial 
roles held by women has risen from 17.5% 
in 2019 (62 female managers) to 22.3% in 
2023 (87 female managers), with this upward 
trend expected to continue into 2024, despite 
the war in Ukraine. This trend means that 
the Group is tracking well to achieve its 
published target of at least 25% of managerial 
roles to be held by women by 2030. 

The Committee was also pleased to note 
that below the managerial level, the overall 
percentage of women in the workforce 
improved from 28.7% in 2022 to 30.9% in 
2023. However, it was noted that the overall 
number of employees had declined as a 
result of the war in Ukraine. In 2022, the 
number of females in the workforce stood 
at 2,290 but had declined to 2,130 females 
in the workforce in 2023. This decline is due 
to some employees leaving the Group due 
to the current circumstances in Ukraine.

As at 31 December 2023, the Committee 
was composed of three Independent 
Non-executive Directors, Graeme Dacomb, 
Vitalii Lisovenko and Fiona MacAulay. 
Graeme Dacomb stepped down from the 
Committee at the year end. I would like 
to thank the members of the Committee 
for all their work during the year.

Lucio Genovese
Chair of the Nominations Committee
17 April 2024

As a result of Ms Andersen stepping down 
from the Board in May 2023, the composition 
of the Board dropped below the gender 
diversity target of 40% set by the FTSE 
Women Leaders Review. The Board remains 
committed to ensuring that the composition of 
the Board meets this ratio but considering the 
challenges faced by the Group arising from the 
war in Ukraine, it was decided to not increase 
the number of Board Directors in 2023. This 
decision will be revisited in 2024 with a view 
to also meeting the ethnic minority target 
set by the Parker Review at the same time.

Aligned with the goals of the Parker Review, 
the Committee is committed to ensuring that 
the Board’s composition reflects the Group’s 
workforce and the communities where the 
Group operates. At the end of 2022, the 
Committee commissioned external search 
consultancy, Wilbury Stratton, to conduct 
research into how comparable organisations 
are responding to the Parker Review. The 
outcome of this study enabled the Board 
to chart a course to ensure a sustainable, 
diverse and ethnically representative Board. 
The Committee therefore progressed 
recruitment in 2023 but has not yet identified 
a suitable candidate for appointment given 
the challenges faced by the Company and 
constraints imposed on it by the war in 
Ukraine. The Board is nevertheless committed 
to making an appointment from an ethnic 
minority group to the Board ahead of the 
Parker Review deadline of December 2024.

The Group has formal policies in place to 
promote equality of opportunity across the 
whole organisation, regardless of gender, 
ethnicity, religion, disability, age or sexual 
orientation. The Group also operates a 
Fe_munity programme which aims to 
enhance and accelerate the development of 
our senior female managers and to support 
them as they navigate the challenges and 
gender biases that might hinder their career 
progression in the workplace and within 
broader society. The Group also hosts regular 
talks by senior female leaders from inside and 
outside our business, along with a mentoring 
scheme as part of this same programme. 

Membership and meetings
The Committee is chaired by Lucio 
Genovese and as at 31 December 2023 
its other members were Vitalii Lisovenko, 
Fiona MacAulay and Graeme Dacomb. 
Ms Ann-Christin Andersen stepped down 
from the Board on 25 May 2023, having 
also served as a member of the Committee 
until this date. Following a review of the 
workload of the others directors, a decision 
was taken not to replace Ms Andersen on 
the Committee at that time. Mr Dacomb 
stepped down from the Board and the 
Committee on 31 December 2023. A 
further review of Committee membership 
will be conducted in the course of 2024.

The Committee is required by its terms of 
reference to meet at least once a year and 
met on four scheduled occasions in 2023. 
All meetings were held face-to-face. All 
Non-executive Directors have a standing 
invitation to attend all Committee meetings, 
with the consent of the Committee Chair. 
In practice, most Directors generally attend 
all meetings. Discussions at the meetings 
covered the responsibilities outlined 
earlier, with particular focus on Board skills 
development and Non-executive and Executive 
succession planning and recruitment.

Succession planning 
and recruitment
The Committee is responsible for the 
composition, structure and size of the Board 
and its Committees, the appointment of 
Directors and executive management, and for 
ensuring effective succession planning for the 
Board and other business critical roles to fulfil 
the leadership needs of the organisation. The 
Committee also plays a vital role in ensuring 
that the Group continues to adhere to the 
high standards of corporate governance that 
our stakeholders rightly expect. It, therefore, 
works to ensure that the Board has the right 
members both now and in the future to deliver 
the Group’s strategy and ensure its long-term 
success. The Committee plans ahead for 
future recruitment to make sure that the 
Board continues to have the diversity, skills 
and experience it needs. The roles of all 
Directors are summarised on page 106.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

123

In 2023, the Committee revisited the training 
and development needs of the Board. As a 
result one director attended formal training 
with the UK Governance Institute and the 
full Board received briefings on ESG and 
corporate governance topics. The Committee 
also asked the Chief Human Resources 
Officer to refresh the Board’s Skills matrix to 
ensure that the matrix remains up to date to 
inform the recruitment and development of 
Board directors (for further information see the 
Board’s skills matrix on page 97). This work 
will be progressed in the course of 2024.

The Committee also participated in the 
process to appoint Lucio Genovese as 
Executive Chair, following the resignation 
of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Jim 
North. The Committee considered that 
attracting suitable external candidates for 
the CEO role would be impacted by the 
ongoing war in Ukraine, and therefore took 
a decision to postpone conducting a formal 
search until the war ends. As an interim 
measure, the Committee recommended 
that Mr Genovese assume leadership of the 
Group, on an interim basis, until a formal 
market search can be undertaken.

In 2023, the Committee also recommended 
the appointment of the CFO, Mr Nikolay 
Kladiev as an Executive Director of the 
Company. This appointment underscores 
the Company’s robust talent management 
process which identifies individuals with 
high potential for inclusion in succession 
plans for business critical roles.

Ms Ann-Christen Andersen stepped down 
as an independent Non-executive Director 
in May 2023. As a consequence, a search 
was progressed to find a replacement and 
Stonehaven International, a global search firm, 
was retained by the Committee to assist with 
the search. Stonehaven is accredited under the 
UK Government’s Enhanced Code of Conduct 
for Executive Search Firms and the Voluntary 
Code of Conduct on diversity best practice. 
The firm has no other connection with the 
Company. Prior to the search commencing, 
the Committee agreed the skills and 
experience it considered necessary for the role 
and also stipulated that candidates needed 
audit experience in order to provide further 
bench strength in relation to financial and risk 
management oversight of the Board. Lists of 
potential candidates were then identified by 
Stonehaven and discussed with Committee 
members to agree shortlists to be interviewed. 
Shortlisted candidates were interviewed 
by members of the Committee and, where 
practical, other Directors. Following these 
interviews, the Committee recommended 
the appointment of Mr Stuart Brown who 
joined the Board on 22 October 2023.

When progressing recruitment, the Board 
seeks to ensure that a broad range of diverse 
candidates are taken into account including 
when drawing up shortlists of candidates for 
appointment to the Board, and the Board will 
only engage executive search consultants 
who have signed up to the Voluntary Code 
of Conduct for executive search firms. The 
final decision to make appointments to the 
Board is, however, made on merit against 
objective criteria, so as to ensure that the 
strongest possible candidate for the role 
is recruited. However, the Committee will 
continue to ensure that the Diversity, Equity 
and Inclusion policy is considered when 
conducting all searches for Board positions, 
and will take account of the recommendations. 

Election and re-election
In accordance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code, Stuart Brown and Nikolay 
Kladiev will stand for election and all other 
Directors for re-election by shareholders at the 
Company’s AGM scheduled for May 2024. The 
range of skills and experience offered by the 
current Board is mentioned in this report and 
is set out on pages 98 to 99. The Committee 
and the Board consider the performance of 
each of the Directors standing for election or 
re-election to be fully satisfactory and have 
demonstrated commitment to their respective 
roles. The Board, therefore, strongly supports 
the election and re-election of all Directors 
and recommends that shareholders vote in 
favour of the relevant resolutions at the AGM.

Board diversity policy
The Board places great importance on having 
an inclusive and diverse Board and workforce 
and recognises the important leadership 
role that the Board needs to play in creating 
an environment in which all contributions 
are valued, different perspectives are 
embraced, and so far as possible biases are 
acknowledged and mitigated. In support of this 
goal, the Board adopted a Diversity, Equity and 
Inclusion policy (“DEI Policy”) in 2019 which is 
kept under review by the Committee. The DEI 
Policy aims to promote equality of opportunity 
across the whole organisation, regardless of 
gender, ethnicity, religion, disability, age or 
sexual orientation as well as address gender 
diversity imbalances in the workforce while 
also delivering sustainable talent pipelines for 
succession to senior leadership roles. The 
Board shares ownership with the Executive 
Committee of the DEI Policy and progress 
updates are presented to the Board for 
review every six months to assess progress 
against the targets and enable adjustments 
to be made to the programme where 
necessary. A summary of the Board’s diversity 
information can be found on page 103.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS124

Nominations Committee Report continued

In support of its DEI goals, the Group has 
formal policies in place to promote equality 
of opportunity across the whole organisation, 
regardless of gender, ethnicity, religion, 
disability, age or sexual orientation. The 
Group also operates a Fe_munity programme 
which aims to enhance and accelerate the 
development of our senior female talent and to 
support them as they navigate the challenges 
and gender biases that might hinder their 
career progression in the workplace and 
within broader society. In 2023, running this 
programme for a fourth time was disrupted 
and postponed as external facilitators involved 
in the delivery of the programme were unable 
to travel to Ukraine because of the war. Instead 
a mentorship programme was initiated using 
alumni from previous programmes to mentor 
women within the workforce identified to 
attend the fourth Fe_munity programme. 
This mentorship programme will continue 
alongside the Fe_munity programme and 
other DEI related activities in 2024.

In 2023, the Group was able to hold 
regular talks by senior female leaders from 
inside and outside the business and host 
a Fe_teens programme which followed a 
similar format to the full-scale Fe_munity 
programme. This programme is aimed at 
young women in the surrounding community 
and is part of the Group’s broader corporate 
social responsibility initiative to support 
the overall development of Ukrainian 
society as well as interest young people to 
consider a career in the mining industry.

In 2023, the Committee was pleased to 
note that the proportion of managerial roles 
held by women rose from 20.9% in 2022 (81 
female managers) to 22.3% in 2023 (87 female 
managers), with this upward trend expected 
to continue into 2024, despite the war in 
Ukraine. This trend means that the Group is 
tracking well to achieve its stated target of at 
least 25% of managerial roles to be held by 
women by 2030. The Committee was also 
pleased to note that the overall number of 
women in the workforce for 2023 improved 
from 28.7% in 2022 to 30.9% in 2023. 

The Committee places high importance 
on having a diverse, inclusive and 
sustainable Board and workforce and, 
to this end, the Committee reviews and 
approves succession plans each year for 
business critical roles, including reviewing 
succession plans for the Board.

Following the resignations of Ms Ann-Christin 
Andersen and Mr Graeme Dacomb in the 
year, and the appointment of Mr Stuart 
Brown, the Committee is satisfied that the 
present composition of the Board provides an 
appropriate mix of skills, experience, diversity 
and perspectives on the Board. However, 
the Committee has noted that following 
Ms Andersen’s departure that the Board’s 
composition no longer meets the gender 
ratio set by the Hampton Alexander Review 
of 33% women on boards nor the increased 
target of 40% by the FTSE Women Leaders 
Review. The Board takes account of this 
ratio and expects to meet this target again 
through an appointment to the Board in 2024.

During the course of the year, the Committee 
also reviewed the talent pipeline and 
succession plans for business-critical roles 
at the Group and at Operational levels and 
confirmed development plans for identified 
high potentials which included actions to 
mitigate identified knowledge and skills gaps 
over the short to medium term. The Committee 
noted that specific focus and attention was 
needed to ensure adequate succession 
coverage for the Group Chief Financial 
Officer, Group Chief Marketing Officer, Group 
Treasurer at the corporate level and Production 
Director, Capital Construction Director and IT 
Director at the operations level. The Committee 
requested the Chief Human Resources 
Officer to develop strategies in the first half 
of 2024 for execution in the second half of 
2024 that will enhance succession coverage 
of these business critical roles and assure 
business continuity in 2024 and beyond.

The Board is committed to ensuring that 
the Board is not only composed of an 
appropriate mix of skills and experience but 
that it is also representative of the broader 
society within which the Group operates 
and reflects a sustainable, diverse and 
ethnically representative Board. In support 
of this objective, the Company retained 
Wilbury Stratton, an external search and 
research consultancy, to conduct recruitment 
in 2023 for a minority ethnic director as 
defined by the Parker Review. Arising from 
this search, the Committee interviewed a 
number of candidates presented but did 
not find an appropriate candidate with 
the necessary experience profile and skill 
set to augment the existing skills of the 
Board. The search will continue in 2024 
and despite the added complexity imposed 
by the war in Ukraine, the Board remains 
committed to making an appointment 
ahead of the Parker Review deadline for 
FTSE 250 companies of December 2024.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

125

Board diversity policy update 
Board objective

Progress in 2023

Foster a diverse and 
inclusive workplace 
culture aligned with 
the Company’s Values, 
Purpose and Strategy

Increase Board gender 
diversity and women 
in management below 
the Board

Monitor diversity 
programme outcomes 
and make adjustments 
to ensure overall 
objectives are met

–  Upgrading of facilities and access points continued at operations to enable accommodation of people with 

disabilities.

–  Fe_munity teens programme was run in the local community to foster the recruitment of women into the 

workforce.

–  Assessment of workforce technical skills in the plant continued and training conducted to ensure workforce 

capability supports business requirements.

–  Unconscious bias training implemented for junior and middle managers at operations to enhance diversity 

awareness at leadership levels.

–  An update of the Board’s skills matrix was initiated which will be further progressed in 2024.
–  Formal search launched for an additional Non-executive Director from a minority ethnic group to meet the 

– 

requirements of the Parker Review.
Initiatives in 2023 advanced women in leadership to 22.3% (87 female managers) (2022: 20.9% (81 female 
managers)); target for 2024 (towards target of 25% by 2030) set at 22.8% by the end of 2024.

–  Total female representation as percentage of the workforce currently at 30.9% (2,130 female employees) 

(2022: 28.7% (2,290 female employees)).

–  Board review conducted of the Group’s talent pipeline and succession plans for senior business critical 

leadership roles, including identification of female candidates for accelerated development.

–  Undergraduate bursary programme targeting women continued in 2023.

New and repeat activities planned for 2024, subject to any restrictions imposed by the war in Ukraine, will include:

–  Workforce Diversity and Inclusion education.
–  Unconscious bias training for senior management.
–  Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (“STEM”) ambassador visits to local schools and colleges.
–  STEM streamers competition run online with students from local schools.
–  Fe_munity programme for potential women leaders at operations.
–  Selection of bursary award school leavers.

Workforce diversity
Ferrexpo’s policy is to employ a diverse 
workforce and thought is given to recruit 
as widely as possible, taking into account, 
amongst other things, gender, race, social 
background, education and disability. In 
2019, the Board set a diversity target of 25% 
women in leadership to be achieved by 2030. 
Achieving this target remains a challenge in 
view of there being historically a very limited 
number of female applicants for technical 
jobs in the natural resources sector.

During the year, the Committee reviewed the 
progress made towards the Group’s target 
and although the overall number of women 
in the workforce increased to 30.9% (2,130 
female employees) (2022: 28.7% (2,290 
female employees)), the number of women in 
leadership positions advanced to 22.3% (87 
female managers (2021: 20.9% (81 female 
managers)). The Committee was gratified with 
this result and in order to sustain this upward 
trend, the Committee approved diversity and 
inclusion actions for execution in 2024. 

Gender diversity targets were included in 
the Executive Business Scorecard for the 
first time in 2021 to provide additional focus 
and attention on the achievement of this 
strategic imperative. A diversity target has 
again been included in the scorecard for 
2024 of 23.3%. This target represents the 
appointment of an additional four women in 
senior leadership positions by the end of 2024.

Disability
Ferrexpo is proud to employ registered 
disabled staff representing more than 4% 
of our Ukrainian workforce. This helps us 
to reflect the diversity in wider society as 
well as deliver on our legal obligations. 

The Corporate Governance Report was 
approved by the Board on 17 April 2024.

Lucio Genovese 
Chair of the Nominations Committee
17 April 2024

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS126

Remuneration Report

The Committee is chaired by Fiona MacAulay. The 
Committee consists of three independent Non-executive 
Directors as required by the UK Corporate Governance 
Code and is also attended by the Chair of the Board 
and, by invitation, the Executive Chair, the Chief Human 
Resources Officer, and a representative from Korn Ferry, 
the Committee’s independent advisor.

Fiona MacAulay
Chair of the Remuneration Committee

Membership and  
meeting attendance

Main objective
To establish and maintain on behalf of the 
Board a policy on executive remuneration 
to deliver the Company’s strategy and 
value for shareholders; to agree, monitor 
and report on the remuneration of 
Directors and senior executives; and to 
review wider workforce remuneration and 
other policies in accordance with the UK 
Corporate Governance Code. 

A statement to shareholders 
from the Chair of the 
Remuneration Committee 
As Chair of the Remuneration Committee, 
I am pleased to present the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report1 for the year ended 
31 December 2023.

This report is split into the following sections:

1.  this Statement to shareholders from the 
Chair of the Remuneration Committee 
– summarising the decisions taken by the 
Committee;

Scheduled 
meetings

Ad hoc meetings

2.  an “At a glance” overview of 

Committee 
member

Fiona 
MacAulay

Graeme 
Dacomb

Vitalii 
Lisovenko

Ann-
Christin  
Andersen

Eligible  

Eligible  

to attend Attended

to attend Attended

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

Read the Committee’s 
full objectives and 
responsibilities online: 
https://www.ferrexpo.com/
about-ferrexpo/corporate-
governance/board-
committees/

remuneration;

3.  the proposed new Directors’ 

Remuneration Policy for which 
shareholder approval is being sought at 
the 2024 AGM; 

4.  the Annual Report on Remuneration, 

setting out how we have paid Directors in 
2023 and how we intend to operate the 
policy in 2024.

Our approach to remuneration 
The Committee strives to align the interests 
of the executives with shareholders, and the 
Board keeps under review the structure and 
level of remuneration afforded through short 
and long-term incentive schemes. It is the 
policy of the Board to align executive and 
shareholder interests by linking a substantial 
proportion of executive remuneration to 
performance, basing short-term rewards on 
a balanced portfolio of financial, operational, 
ESG and strategic performance targets with 
long-term alignment with shareholders through 
the operation of multi-year share-based plans. 

Our policy is purposefully weighted 
towards short-term performance targets 
given the Company’s focus on operational 
excellence and the fact that Ferrexpo does 
not control the price of iron ore, which is 
dictated by market conditions. As a result, 
setting performance targets that align to 
the factors directly within the control of the 
executive team is considered appropriate.

We ensure that remuneration packages are 
competitive through assessing remuneration 
packages against the relevant market 
comparables to ensure that Ferrexpo 
can attract, motivate and retain talented 
executives. We align remuneration with 
shareholders through the performance 
conditions we set, share-based pay delivered 
through partial deferral of annual bonus into 
shares and the operation of annual awards 
under a share plan and through market 
consistent share ownership guidelines. 
This approach applies across the executive 
leadership team and has resulted in a robust 
link between pay and performance to date.

Board changes during 2023 
On 25 May 2023, Ann-Christin Andersen 
stood down from the Board as a Non-
executive Director and as a member of the 
Remuneration Committee. She has served on 
the Committee since July 2021. I would like 
to thank her for her contribution to the work 
of the Committee while she was a member.

The leadership of the Company was 
restructured during the 2023 financial 
year following our former Chief Executive 
Officer, Jim North, leaving at the end of 
June 2023. The treatment of the former 
CEO’s remuneration on cessation was in 
line with the Policy and applicable legal 
requirements with full details, including in 
respect of the exercise of discretion by the 
Committee, provided on pages 149 to 150.

As part of the leadership changes, Lucio 
Genovese assumed the role of Interim 
Executive Chair (“Executive Chair”) from 1 July 
2023 and Nikolay Kladiev was promoted 
to the Board in the role of Chief Financial 
Officer with effect from the 2023 AGM. 

1.  This report has been prepared by the Remuneration Committee (the “Committee”) on behalf of the Board in accordance 

with the requirements of the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority, Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized 
Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 (as amended in 2013, 2018 and 2019) and the UK 
Corporate Governance Code. The elements subject to audit are highlighted throughout.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

127

These leadership changes ensured business 
continuity within an operating structure 
that enables timely decision taking in what 
is a dynamic operating environment.

On assuming the role of Executive Chair in 
July 2023, it was agreed Lucio Genovese 
would receive an additional fixed fee on an 
interim basis whilst he serves in the role. 
The total fixed fee was set at US$1,000,000, 
split between the rate in his former role as 
Non-executive Chair of US$525,000 and an 
additional interim fee of US$475,000. This 
additional fee reflects his increased time 
commitment in role and non-participation 
in the Company’s incentive plans. 

Mr Kladiev, the Chief Financial Officer 
(“CFO”), was appointed to the Board with 
effect from the 2023 AGM. His salary was 
set at CHF450,000 and, in line with the 
Policy, he continues to participate in the 
annual bonus scheme and remain eligible 
for annual awards under the LTIP. Full details 
of his pay are included within this report.

Business context and 2023 
employee remuneration
The second year of war in Ukraine continued 
to impact the Group’s operations in 
Ukraine, creating a high level of operational 
variability which impacted the Company’s 
remuneration schemes. This necessitated 
the Company to adopt an agile approach 
to remuneration in 2023 to ensure that the 
Group’s remuneration practices fulfilled 
their original intent. The Committee spent 
time overseeing Group-wide pay decisions 
in our exceptional circumstances.

Despite the rigours of war, management 
worked tirelessly to protect the Group’s 
workforce and preserve the integrity of 
our assets to enable us to continue to 
produce and sell our high-grade pellets. 
The strategy to right-size our business 
quickly, to enable us to be more responsive 
to unpredictable circumstances has proved 
successful. The workforce likewise showed 
incredible resilience and commitment in very 
challenging circumstances. The Group also 
made unprecedented contributions from 
its Humanitarian Fund, focusing its efforts 
on the support for employees called up to 
serve in the military, a variety of humanitarian 
initiatives, including providing food and 
accommodation for internally displaced 
people and assistance to surrounding 
communities and healthcare aid, including the 
provision of medicines, medical equipment 
and vehicles throughout the country.

Employees remain the bedrock of Ferrexpo’s 
operations and we are unwavering in our 
determination to support our people and 
to safeguard them and their families. Amid 
the prevailing circumstances, the Group 
implemented a rehabilitation programme 
for employees returning from serving in the 

military to support their reintegration into 
the workplace. The programme includes 
medical care and physical rehabilitation, 
the provision of prosthetics, as well as 
psychological counselling and support 
for employees and their families.

As was the case in 2022, the lack of access to 
Black Sea export routes in 2023 constrained 
our export capacity, sharply reducing 
opportunities to export product volumes to 
some customers in the Middle East and Asia. 
This forced us to curb production levels and 
only operate one, and sometimes two, of our 
four pellet lines to match the reduced export 
capacity available. As a result of the Group’s 
variable production profile, it was necessary 
to adjust the Group’s remuneration schemes. 
The variable rate of production throughout the 
year meant that the deployment of operational 
employees had to be constantly scaled up or 
down to align with the required production 
profile each week. While the majority of 
production-related personnel remained on 
full pay, their production-related variable 
monthly pay was impacted. Production staff 
in excess of requirements were placed on 
furlough on two-thirds pay, and administrative 
staff and some support staff were placed 
on a shorter shift roster of seven instead of 
eight hours per day and paid commensurately 
to align with the lower production profile.

Although the Group’s operations only 
operated at around half capacity, a decision 
was taken to maintain employment levels 
and not to lay off excess staff to reciprocate 
the unwavering commitment shown by 
employees to work despite the perilous 
environment within which the Company was 
forced to operate in 2023. To minimise the 
impact on earnings and alleviate some of the 
effects of the cost of living crisis, the Group 
took a decision to pay a special bonus at 
the end of the year, to staff at operations, of 
between 10% and 50% of salary dependent 
on organisational level and to award a general 
salary increase of 10% from April 2024.

The Group’s collective agreements include 
provisions designed to provide equal 
remuneration for men and women performing 
the same job. This approach helps to ensure 
that salaries, incentives, benefits and other 
forms of compensation – both monetary 
and non-monetary – remain free from 
discrimination based on gender, race, religion 
or trade union membership. These principles 
are also enshrined in the Group’s Code of 
Conduct, and approach to remuneration, 
which ensures an equitable approach to 
salary adjustments for employees returning 
from extended absences, such as paternity 
and maternity leaves or military service.

The economic consequences of the war and 
the general downturn in the global economy 
were also felt by employees in other Group 
office locations as soaring energy prices 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

and higher inflation impacted households 
worldwide. Given these inflationary pressures, 
the Committee agreed adjustments in 
base salaries for all employees aligned with 
prevailing CPI in the Group’s various locations.

2023 Executive remuneration 
As detailed above, the ongoing impact of 
the Russian invasion of Ukraine resulted in 
a number of operational challenges which 
contributed to lower production volumes 
and profitability than was the case in 2022. 
This meant our financial and operational 
performance was generally below the 
threshold targets set in our annual bonus 
for 2023 albeit we continued production 
throughout the year and delivered a Group 
cash EBITDA of US$63 million. Outside of 
the financial and operational targets set for 
2023, due to the dedication of our colleagues 
in challenging circumcentres, we delivered 
strongly against our safety, diversity and 
carbon reduction targets in addition to 
efficiently managing our pellet stockpiles. We 
also made progress against a number of key 
strategic objectives set for the bonus at the 
start of 2023, including in the areas of business 
optimisation and compliance. Outside of the 
strategic targets set at the start of 2023, we 
also responded to the dynamic environment 
that we were operating in, including opening 
new shipping routes to market to enable 
continued supply to our customers. In this 
context based on performance against the 
targets set at the start of the year, the CFO 
achieved a bonus at 49.6% of the maximum 
(74.4% of salary) for the year under review. This 
payment was consistent with the wider bonus 
awards in the Company and the Committee 
was comfortable that this bonus award 
reflected the challenging year for the Group 
and the wider stakeholder experience, and 
therefore did not apply discretion. Full details 
of the performance assessment are set out 
on page 144. The former CEO and Executive 
Chair were not eligible for the 2023 STIP.

With regard to the 2021 LTIP, vesting was 
based on the TSR outperformance of a 
tailored comparator group (75% weighting), 
Production of 67% Fe pellets (12.5% weighting) 
and carbon emissions reductions (12.5% 
weighting) over a three-year vesting period 
to 31 December 2023. The Committee 
assessed the performance of the Company 
over the full three-year performance period 
and noted that the Russian invasion of Ukraine 
on 24 February 2022 had weighed heavily on 
the Company’s share price, resulting in TSR 
being below the bespoke Index of comparable 
Iron Ore and Composite Miners and therefore 
there was no vesting under this element. 
However, with regards to the proportion of 
67% Fe pellets produced as a percentage of 
total pellet production, we delivered 3.71% 
which exceeded the lower end of the target 
range set for the 2021 award of 3% and so 

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS128

Remuneration Report continued

achieved vesting at 4.28% of the possible 
12.5% for this part of award. Over the same 
period, our carbon emissions intensity, 
which takes into account emissions relative 
to the production delivered reduced by 6.1% 
which was above the maximum target set 
for the 2021 award of 5% and so the 12.5% 
of the total award available for this part of 
the award vested in full. Taken as a whole, 
the Committee therefore determined that the 
2021 LTIP vested at 16.78% of maximum.

being retained so that in the event that the 
Russian invasion of Ukraine comes to an 
end, the Committee has the option to return 
to Performance Shares if the operating 
environment is sufficiently robust to enable 
the Company to do so. Any move to grant 
Performance Shares would only take place 
following appropriate dialogue with the 
Company’s shareholders and the Company 
does not intend to grant Restricted Shares 
and Performance Shares in combination.

–  Performance underpin: the Committee 

will consider the Company’s performance 
relative to its mid to long-term financial, 
operational and sustainability plans as well 
as individual performance and may reduce 
the vesting level, including to zero, if 
performance is not considered consistent 
with the Board’s plans. This assessment 
will take into account the dynamic 
operating environment that currently 
prevails as a result of the Russian invasion 
of Ukraine. 

–  FY2024 Proposed Award to the CFO:

–  Restricted Share Awards: 25% of salary.
–  The proposed award level has been 
set in relation to Nikolay Kladiev’s 
appointment to the PLC Board having 
had regard to (i) his importance to the 
Company (ii) historic awards to the 
Executive Directors at Ferrexpo (iii) 
our current share price and (iv) wider 
market practice where grants of 
Performance Share Awards are typically 
in the region of 150% of salary to 200% 
of salary for a FTSE 250 company CFO. 

The use of Restricted Share Awards will 
provide alignment with the Company and 
shareholders, whilst the simplicity and greater 
certainty provides a key retention tool for the 
senior management in these difficult and 
uncertain operating conditions. 

The CFO, Nikolay Kladiev, will be the only 
Director receiving Restricted Share Awards, 
however, the Policy will also be applied to the 
wider Executive Committee on the same 
terms albeit at different award levels. Lucio 
Genovese, as Interim Executive Chair, will not 
participate in this or any incentive plans. 

For the purposes of consistency between 
the short and long-term incentive plans, the 
revised Policy has also been updated with 
some modest changes to the wording such 
that the discretions afforded to the Committee 
in the annual bonus an long-term incentive 
plans have been aligned and this is consistent 
with the updated long-term incentive plan 
rules being presented at the 2024 AGM.

2024 Remuneration Policy change: 
Introduction of Restricted Shares 
In designing our revised Policy, we took into 
consideration the Investment Association’s 
guidance in moving from Performance to 
Restricted Share Awards. The key features of 
our proposed long-term incentive provision 
are as follows:

–  Annual Award Limit: a 50% discount in 
moving from Performance to Restricted 
Share Awards;
–  Restricted Share Awards: 100% of 

salary;

–  Performance Share Awards: 200% of 
salary (as above, current Policy limit 
and not expected to be used during the 
ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine).
–  Vesting: three years after grant, subject 
to continued service, with any shares 
vesting subject to a two-year holding 
period;

Key activities of the Committee in 2023 

The Committee’s key activities during the 2023 financial year were:

February
–  Consulting on FY 2022 remuneration outcomes 
with both shareholders and advisory bodies.
–  Planning stakeholder engagement for 2023.
–  Determining the 2022 bonus outturn.
–  Determining vesting of the 2020 Long-term 

Incentive Plan awards.

–  Setting 2023 annual bonus targets.
–  Reviewing 2023 Long-term Incentive Plan TSR 

March
–  Considering the impact of the war in Ukraine on 

2023 remuneration.

–  Approving the application of the Remuneration 

Policy for 2023.

–  Determining the size of 2023 Long-term 

Incentive Plan awards and the performance 
conditions.

–  Approving awards under the Company’s share 

peer group constituents.

plans. 

–  Signing off the 2022 Remuneration Report.

May
–  Approving exit payments for the CEO.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

With remuneration outcomes aligned across 
the executive leadership of the Group 
and after considering wider stakeholder 
experience through the year, and the additional 
achievements that were delivered outside of 
the bonus plan targets, the Committee was 
comfortable with remuneration outcomes and 
that the policy was operating as intended. 

Remuneration Policy review and 
2024 implementation
With our current Directors’ Remuneration 
Policy due to expire at the 2024 AGM, the 
Committee undertook a review of the operation 
of the Policy during 2023. The conclusion of 
the review was that all aspects of the Policy 
remained appropriate with the exception of the 
long-term incentive plan given the challenges 
noted above in terms of long-term target 
setting and the operation of the shareholding 
requirements given the effect of the Russian 
invasion of Ukraine on the Company’s 
share price and the modest level of awards 
made under the long-term incentive plan.

For completeness, our pay model to date has 
been to provide a market competitive total 
remuneration opportunity through a market 
consistent base salary, an annual bonus 
(using a balanced scorecard of financial, 
operational, ESG and non-financial targets), 
pension and benefits all provided at the same 
time as operating a minimum share ownership 
expectation. Our long-term incentive has 
been modest grants of Performance Shares 
Awards linked to relative total shareholder 
return and sustainability targets. 

The Russian invasion has caused volatility in 
our share price as well as constraining our 
production and so the continued use of our 
current long-term incentive performance 
metrics (relative TSR versus industry peers 
and production of more efficient DR pellets 
at 67%+ Fe) is no longer appropriate as our 
ability to achieve the targets, specifically the 
total shareholder return target, is likely to be 
as much impacted by external factors as 
management actions. As a result, while we 
intend to return to Performance Shares over 
the longer term, we are to seek approval 
to grant Restricted Shares to facilitate the 
retention and motivation of the leadership 
team in the most challenging of external 
circumstances. However, our up-dated Policy 
will retain the ability to grant Performance 
Share awards within it. This flexibility is only 

129

2024 Remuneration Policy application
Subject to the approval of the Policy at the 
2024 AGM, it is our intention to apply the 
Policy as set out below: 

–  The CFO’s salary, consistent with other 
members of the Executive Committee in 
the UK and Switzerland, was increased 
by 4% with effect from 1 January 2024. 
The Committee was comfortable with 
increasing his salary at 4% as part of a 
process of moving his salary, and total 
remuneration package, into line with market 
practice for the role of a FTSE 250 CFO. 
Across the Company, salary budgets 
were set taking into account the rates of 
inflation in the locations in which Ferrexpo 
operates and ranged from 1.5% to 10%. 

–  The annual bonus opportunity for the 

CFO will be 150% of salary. Performance 
will be measured against a balanced 
scorecard of financial, operational and 
ESG targets as summarised on page 146. 
In the current circumstances, reflecting 
the Committee’s objective of incentivising 
and rewarding on a collective basis given 
the challenges presented by the Russian 
invasion of Ukraine, there will be no tailored 
strategic targets set at Group executive 
level in the annual bonus plan for 2024 
(previously strategic targets accounted for 
40% of the total bonus). The performance 
targets set for the 2024 STIP have been 
agreed to reflect the current operating 
environment, and the Committee adopted 
a revised framework under which it will 
determine bonuses for 2024. This revised 
framework continues to include targets 
set with reference to the Company’s 
budget each year but provides greater 
flexibility to take account of the dynamic 
external environment caused by the 
ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. Full 

details are included on page 145. One 
quarter of any bonus earned after tax 
is deferred into shares for two years.

–  The Committee intends to grant the CFO a 
Restricted Share award with a face value of 
25% of his salary, i.e. at the lower end of the 
award possible under the Policy. The award 
will vest three years after grant, subject 
to continued service, with any shares 
vesting subject to a two-year holding 
period. The award will also be subject to 
a performance underpin detailed above.

Consideration of shareholders 
and employees 
We consulted with shareholders in 2023 
in relation to the renewal of the Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy and shareholders 
were understanding of the rationale for the 
proposed changes and so were supportive 
of the proposal. The Committee welcomes 
feedback provided by shareholders and 
considers it in full prior to taking final decisions.

The Committee was also grateful for the 
shareholder and advisory body input into 
the treatment of our 2020 LTIP award on 
vesting in light of the Russian invasion of 
Ukraine. Full details of the treatment of this 
award were set out in the 2022 Directors’ 
Remuneration Report following a short 
consultation in late 2022 and early 2023. 
The 2022 Directors’ Remuneration Report 
received over 97% support at the 2023 AGM.

The Committee also noted feedback on 
remuneration provided by the Employee 
Engagement Non-executive Director, Vitalii 
Lisovenko, which was elicited directly from 
employees during a series of employee 
engagement sessions held with all levels of 
employees in late 2023. These sessions tested 
a range of employee engagement elements 
including the effectiveness of remuneration 
and benefits policies and the understanding 

of the alignment between executive 
remuneration and wider company pay policy. 

Understandably, employees raised concerns 
about the impact on pay resulting from 
the decrease in the level of production. 
The reasons for the current situation were 
explained with more frequent communication 
sessions planned throughout 2024 with the 
timing dependent on market developments. 
The announcement of a general salary 
increase of 10% planned for April 2024 
was welcomed and employees were 
appreciative that there had been no layoffs 
as has been the case at other companies 
in Ukraine that are operating within the 
same challenging business environment.

It was also noted that, while the approach to 
remuneration is understood and is generally 
considered to be working effectively, work 
remains ongoing to improve the alignment 
between remuneration with individual 
performance to ensure differentiated 
outcomes. The progress made to date will 
be progressed further in 2024 by the Chief 
Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”). The 
CHRO will also work with the designated 
Employee Engagement Non-executive 
Director, Vitalii Lisovenko, to further 
develop two-way feedback in relation to 
remuneration policies and practices.

I hope you are able to support the rationale for 
the decisions we have taken during the year 
and support the resolution for the approval 
of the Policy and Remuneration Report at 
the 2024 AGM. If you have any questions 
or comments, please feel free to reach 
out through the Chief Human Resources 
Officer (email: g.nortje@ferrexpo.ch).

Fiona MacAulay
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
17 April 2024

July
–  Consideration of 2023 AGM feedback.
–  Reviewing market developments and institutional 

investor issues raised during the 2023 AGM 
season.

–  Considering the treatment of share awards for 

departing executives.

–  Reviewing Remuneration Policy.
–  Approving supplementary fee for the interim 

Executive Chair.

November
–  Reviewing shareholder and advisory body 

feedback in relation to the 2024 Remuneration 
Policy.

–  Reviewing market pay benchmarking data and 
approving any proposed salary increases for 
members of the Executive Committee.

–  Considering performance to date against 2023 

annual bonus targets.

–  Reviewing shareholder advisory body guideline 

updates for 2024 AGM season.

–  Approving amendments to the Long-term 
Incentive Plan rules ahead of 2024 AGM.

–  Approving the 2024 Remuneration Committee 

Planner.

Anticipated key activities of the 
Committee in 2024
–  Consider 2024 AGM feedback.
–  Confirm the application of the new 2024 

Remuneration Policy supports the Company’s 
strategy.

–  Implementing the new 2024 Remuneration 

Policy. 

–  Consider the evolution of performance targets in 
line with the implementation of the business 
strategy through the current challenging 
operating environment.

–  Monitor senior management remuneration.
–  Ensure remuneration decisions are taken in the 
context of the wider stakeholder experience 
through the period.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

Key activities of the Committee in 2023 

The Committee’s key activities during the 2023 financial year were:

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS130

Remuneration Report continued

At a glance (not subject to audit)

Element

Operation

Salary:
To attract and retain 
talent by ensuring 
base salaries are 
competitive in the 
market in which the 
individual is employed

Pension and 
benefits:
To provide market 
competitive benefits

Short-term 
Incentive Plan 
(“STIP”):
To focus management 
on delivery of annual 
business priorities 
which tie into the 
long-term strategic 
objectives of the 
business

–  Annual review by the Committee
– 

Increases typically in line with wider workforce

–  Aligned with pension and benefits offered to local workforce 

–  Maximum opportunity of 150% of salary
–  Target opportunity of 75% of salary
–  Performance conditions based on a scorecard of financial, 

operational and ESG targets

–  Targets set to reflect the Company’s 2024 budget with Committee 

judgement to be used to assess the extent of under or over 
performance so that there is flexibility to take into account the 
dynamic environment caused by the ongoing war in Ukraine

–  Safety underpin
–  25% of bonus deferred into shares for two years

Time-horizon

2024

 2025

 2026

 2027

 2028

Summary of 2023 STIP Business scorecard outcomes  
(60% of bonus)

Total Shareholder Return

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

)
y
r
a
a
s

l

f

o
%

(

t
n
e
m
y
a
p
s
u
n
o
B

Group 
EBITDA 

Safety – 
LTIFR

Diversity
ratio

Carbon 
spend

Production 
volume

Full cash 
costs 
reported

FYM Total 
Movement

Pellet 
stockpile

Total

150

100

)

£

(

l

e
u
a
V

50

0

31 Dec
2020

31 Dec
2021

31 Dec
2022

31 Dec
2023

  Ferrexpo 
—  Ferrexpo —  2023 LTIP Index —  FTSE 250 Index —  FTSE All-Share Index

  FTSE All-Share Index

  2023 LTIP Index 

  FTSE 250 Index 

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

 
 
 
 
 
131

Element

Operation

Time-horizon

2024

 2025

 2026

 2027

 2028

Long-term 
Incentive Plan 
(“LTIP”):
To motivate 
participants to deliver 
appropriate longer-
term returns to 
shareholders by 
encouraging them to 
see themselves not 
just as managers, but 
as part-owners of the 
business

To reflect the current exceptional circumstances of the Company (and 
in particular the challenge of setting long-term performance 
conditions), it is expected that the LTIP will be used to grant 
Restricted Share awards from 2024 that will normally be eligible to 
vest subject to continued employment on the following basis:

–  Policy maximum: 100% of salary (150% in exceptional 

circumstances)

–  Vesting period of three years with a two-year post-vesting holding 

period

–  Performance underpin: the Committee will consider the 

Company’s performance relative to its mid to long-term financial, 
operational and sustainability plans as well as individual 
performance and may reduce the vesting level, including to zero, if 
performance is not considered consistent with the Board’s plans. 
This assessment will take into account the dynamic operating 
environment that currently prevails as a result of the Russian 
invasion of Ukraine. 

The current LTIP also enables performance-related share awards to 
be made on the following basis:

–  Policy maximum: 200% of salary (300% in exceptional 

circumstances)

–  Performance based typically on relative TSR (75% weighting) in 
conjunction with, for example, production (12.5% weighting) and 
carbon emissions (12.5% weighting)

–  Performance measured over three years with two-year post 

vesting holding period

It is not expected that performance-related share awards will be 
made to Executive Directors during the 2024 to 2026 financial years 
unless the current Russian invasion of Ukraine ends. A return to 
performance-related share awards would follow appropriate dialogue 
with shareholders. The limits set out above for restricted share 
awards are set at 50% of the equivalent limits for performance-related 
share awards, in line with Investment Association guidance although 
awards in practice are expected to be materially below the maximum 
levels included in the Policy.

Share ownership 
guideline:
To provide alignment 
of interests between 
Executive Directors 
and shareholders

–  Executive Directors are required to build and maintain a 

shareholding of 200% of salary.

–  Applies for two years post-cessation of employment.

200% of salary

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
132

Remuneration Report continued

Part A: policy section (not subject to audit)

This part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report sets out the Remuneration Policy for the Directors of the Company, which will be put 
to a binding shareholder vote and become formally effective from the 2024 Annual General Meeting, and is intended to apply for three 
years from that date, unless shareholder approval is sought for earlier changes.

Committee
The terms of reference for the Committee were updated during 2020 to comply with changes made to the UK Corporate Governance Code. The 
revised terms of reference were approved by the Board and its duties include the determination of the policy for the remuneration of the Chair of 
the Board, Executive Directors, the members of the Executive Committee, and the Company Secretary as well as their specific remuneration 
packages, including pension rights and, where applicable, any compensation payments. In determining such policy, the Committee is expected 
to take into account all factors which it deems necessary to ensure that members of the senior executive management of the Group are provided 
with appropriate incentives to encourage strong performance and are, in a fair and responsible manner, rewarded for their individual 
contributions to the success of the Group.

The composition of the Committee and its terms of reference comply with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code and are 
available for inspection on the Group’s website at www.ferrexpo.com.

Key principles of the remuneration policy
Ferrexpo’s remuneration policy is designed to help attract, motivate and retain talented executives to help drive the future growth and 
performance of the business. The policy aims to:

–  align executive and shareholder interests; 
– 
– 

link an appropriate proportion of remuneration to performance; 
reward based on a balanced portfolio of performance conditions, where appropriate (e.g. annual business priorities, financial and operational 
targets and individual performance); and 

–  provide rewards that are competitive in the relevant markets to help attract, motivate and retain talented executives.

In determining the Company’s Remuneration Policy, the Committee takes into account the particular business context of the Group, the industry 
segment, the geography of its operations, the relevant talent market for each executive, the location of the executive and remuneration in that 
local market and best practice guidelines set by institutional shareholder bodies. The Committee will continue to give full consideration to the 
principles set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code in relation to Directors’ remuneration and to the guidance of investor relations bodies.

From the policy review undertaken, the Committee is satisfied that the remuneration policy and its application take due account of the six factors 
listed in the UK Corporate Governance Code:

–  Clarity – our policy is well understood by our management team and has been clearly articulated to our shareholders. A key part of our Chief 

Human Resources Officer’s role is engaging with our wider employee base on all our people matters (including remuneration) and we monitor the 
effectiveness of this process through the feedback received. The Board is comfortable that our remuneration policy is clearly understood by our 
employees.

–  Simplicity – the Committee is very mindful of the need to avoid overly complex remuneration structures which can be misunderstood and deliver 
unintended outcomes. Therefore, one of the Committee’s objectives is to ensure that our executive remuneration policies and practices are as 
simple to communicate and operate as possible, while also supporting our strategy.

–  Risk – For Executive Directors, our remuneration policy is designed to ensure that inappropriate risk-taking is not encouraged and will not be 
rewarded via: (i) the use of a balanced scorecard in the short-term incentive plan which employs a blend of financial, operational and non-
financial metrics; (ii) the use of equity via our LTIP (together with shareholding requirements); and (iii) malus/clawback provisions which the 
Executive Directors are required to accept to receive payments under the STIP and awards under the LTIP and which would normally be 
enforced by reducing the number of shares and/or cash subject to outstanding and unvested awards in the first instance. For the Executive 
Chair, given the interim nature of the role, our remuneration policy is designed to ensure that inappropriate risk-taking is not encouraged and 
will not be rewarded by making the Executive Chair ineligible to receive variable remuneration.

–  Predictability – our incentive plans are subject to individual caps, with our share plans also subject to market standard dilution limits. The 

scenario charts on page 138 illustrate how the rewards potentially receivable by our executives vary based on performance delivered and share 
price growth.

–  Proportionality – there is a clear link between individual awards, delivery of strategy and our long-term performance. In addition, the significant 
role played by incentive/at-risk pay, together with the structure of Executive Directors’ service contracts, ensures that poor performance is not 
rewarded.

–  Alignment to culture – Ferrexpo has a strong operational focus which is reflected in its incentives with safety at the heart of its activities and this 
is supported through the use of a specific safety measure in the annual bonus and the ability to reduce the formula-based outcomes based on 
safety performance. Similarly, incentives may also include climate-related performance targets (as primary targets or as underpins) linked to the 
Company’s strategic climate goals.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

133

Changes from the previous Remuneration Policy
The key changes to this Remuneration Policy, from the previous policy approved by shareholders at the 2020 AGM, and as described in the 
Chair’s introductory statement, are as follows:

the introduction of non-performance related restricted share awards under the LTIP to better support the Company’s strategy;

– 
–  aligning the wording in relation to the Committee’s potential use of discretion so that the provisions in the LTIP are consistent with the short-term 
incentive plan. As detailed above, while it is not expected that performance-related LTIP awards will be granted to Executive Directors during the 
operation of the 2024 Remuneration Policy, the policy and LTIP rules will be updated so the discretion provisions are consistent with the 
short-term incentive plan in the event that future performance-related awards are granted. Within the LTIP this would enable the Committee to 
adjust formulaic outcomes (upwards and downwards) as appropriate, taking into account such factors as it determines to be relevant, including 
the broader performance of the Group, individual performance and/or the operating environment of the Group; and

–  a change to the share ownership guidelines so that Executive Directors are only required to retain 50% of the net of tax shares vesting under the 

LTIP (from both performance share awards and restricted share awards) or received under their deferred bonus until the share ownership 
guidelines are met (rather than, as at present, 100% of the net of tax shares vesting).

Executive Director policy table
This section of our report summarises the policy for each component of Executive Director remuneration. The principles below also apply where 
appropriate to the members of the Executive Committee.

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation

Opportunity

Performance metrics

Fixed pay

Base salary
To attract and retain talent 
by ensuring base salaries 
are competitive in the 
market in which the 
individual is employed.

Base salaries are typically reviewed annually, 
with reference to: the individual’s role, experience 
and performance; business performance; salary 
levels for equivalent posts at relevant 
comparators; cost of living and inflation (taking 
account of the location of the executive); and the 
range of salary increases applying across the 
Group.

Pension
To provide retirement 
benefits.

Executive Directors will, as appropriate, be 
offered membership of a scheme which complies 
with relevant legislation (where necessary, 
additional pension entitlements will be provided) 
or cash in lieu of pension.

For information, pension for UK-based 
employees is currently set at a maximum of 
5% of salary with pension for Swiss-based 
employees is differentiated by age and is also 
set at up to 5% of salary. 

Statutory lump sums and/or end of service 
gratuities may be accrued each year and may be 
payable on termination in line with the relevant 
legislation where this exists.

Business and, where 
relevant for current 
Executive Directors, 
individual performance 
are considerations in 
setting base salary.

Not performance 
related.

Base salary increases are applied 
in line with the outcome of 
reviews, which will not exceed 5% 
p.a. (or, if higher, the applicable 
inflation rate) on an annualised 
basis over the period over which 
this policy applies. Increases 
above this level may be applied 
where appropriate to reflect 
changes in the scale, scope and 
responsibility attaching to the role 
and market comparability 
(including following appointment 
to the Board on a on a below 
market base salary).

Executive Directors will receive a 
pension that is aligned with the 
typical (i.e. most common) 
practice for employees in the 
location that the executive is 
based.

The employer contribution will 
normally be limited to a 
percentage of base salary. 
Associated benefits and variable 
pay will only be included where 
there is a statutory requirement to 
do so.

The employer contribution will be 
limited to 10% of salary or higher 
subject to compliance with local 
statutory requirements to reflect 
actual practice in the Company.

Benefits 
Competitive in the market 
in which the individual is 
employed.

Benefits are paid to comply with local statutory 
requirements and as applicable to attract or 
retain executives of a suitable calibre. They 
include life insurance, personal accident, travel 
and medical insurance. Where appropriate, 
additional benefits may be offered, including, but 
not limited to, accommodation allowances, 
travel, enhanced sick pay, relocation/expatriate 
relocation benefits, tax and legal advice.

Benefits’ values vary by role and 
eligibility and costs are reviewed 
periodically. Increases to the 
existing benefits will not normally 
exceed applicable inflation. 
Increases above this level may be 
applied, where appropriate, to 
reflect changes in role, scope, 
location and responsibility.

Not performance 
related.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS134

Remuneration Report continued

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation

Opportunity

Performance metrics

Variable pay

Short-term Incentive Plan 
(“STIP”)
To focus management on 
delivery of annual business 
priorities which tie into the 
long-term strategic 
objectives of the business, 
which include, but are not 
limited to, developing the 
reserve base, increasing 
production, reducing costs, 
reducing the risk profile of 
the business, expanding 
the customer portfolio, and 
expanding geographically.

Targets are set at the start of the year against 
which performance is measured. The Committee 
determines the extent to which these have been 
achieved. The Committee can exercise judgment 
in determining an appropriate outcome at 
performance levels both below and above the 
target level of performance for each performance 
measure. The Committee also has the ability to 
adjust bonus outcomes based on its assessment 
of individual contribution. Furthermore, the 
Committee can exercise discretion to adjust the 
formulaic outcome or amount of bonus payable 
(upwards and downwards), taking into account 
such factors as it determines to be relevant, 
including factors outside of management control 
or where it believes the outcome is not truly 
reflective of individual performance or in line with 
overall Company performance.

Maximum opportunity of 150% of 
salary.

Performance related.

The target opportunity is 50% of 
maximum and the threshold 
opportunity is up to one-third of 
maximum.

Performance targets 
can include financial, 
non-financial and 
personal achievement 
criteria measured over 
one financial year.

The Committee has 
discretion to make 
changes in future years 
to reflect the evolving 
nature of the strategic 
imperatives that may be 
facing the Company.

Normally paid as a mixture of cash and deferred 
shares with the cash portion paid following the 
publication of the audited results. The deferred 
share portion will normally be a minimum of 25% 
of the total bonus (with after tax bonus used to 
acquire shares or the deferral taking place 
through a deferred share award) with the shares 
eligible for release after a period of two years. 
Dividend equivalents may accrue on deferred 
bonus shares.

Malus and clawback provisions will apply in the 
case of individual gross misconduct, an error in 
assessing performance against the condition, 
corporate failure (for which the individual was 
partly or wholly responsible) and/or in the event 
that the individual is found legally responsible 
for:
–  a material misstatement of the Annual 

Accounts; or

–  a failure of risk management or reputational 

damage to the Company.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

135

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation

Opportunity

Performance metrics

Long-term Incentive Plan 
(“LTIP”)
To motivate participants to 
deliver appropriate 
longer-term returns to 
shareholders by 
encouraging them to see 
themselves not just as 
managers, but as part-
owners of the business.

The LTIP framework was originally approved by 
shareholders at the 2018 AGM to enable the 
grant of performance share awards 
(“Performance Share Awards”) and will be 
amended at the 2024 AGM to enable the grant of 
restricted share awards (“Restricted Share 
Awards”). It is not expected that Performance 
Share Awards will be granted to Executive 
Directors during the 2024 to 2026 policy period 
but the Committee reserves the right to revisit 
this position should the Russian invasion of 
Ukraine end.

To the extent that an LTIP award vests, this will 
include the applicable dividends on the shares 
earned during the vesting period. Subsequent 
dividends on shares held by participants are paid 
in shares.

Vesting of Restricted Share awards is normally 
subject to a three-year continued employment 
requirement and consideration of a performance 
underpin.

Vesting of Performance Share Awards is subject 
to performance measured over a period of at 
least three years. The Committee can exercise 
discretion to adjust the extent of vesting 
(upwards and downwards), taking into account 
such factors as it determines to be relevant, 
including the broader performance of the Group, 
individual performance and/or the operating 
environment of the Group.

A two-year holding period applies to shares 
vesting under the LTIP.

Malus and clawback provisions will apply in the 
case of individual gross misconduct, an error in 
assessing performance against the condition or 
underpin, corporate failure (for which the 
individual was partly or wholly responsible) and/
or in the event that the individual is found legally 
responsible for:
–  a material misstatement of the Annual 

Accounts; or

–  a failure of risk management or reputational 

damage to the Company.

The LTIP provides for:
–  annual Restricted Share 

Awards up to an aggregate 
limit of 100% of salary in 
normal circumstances. This 
limit may be exceeded in 
exceptional circumstances but 
will not exceed 150% of salary; 
and

–  annual Performance Share 
Awards up to an aggregate 
limit of 200% of salary in 
normal circumstances. This 
limit may be exceeded in 
exceptional circumstances but 
will not exceed 300% of salary. 
The threshold opportunity is 
20% of maximum.

The above LTIP limits are 
cumulative, with value of shares 
subject to Restricted Share 
Awards counting double vis-à-vis 
the Performance Share Award 
limits. It that it is not envisaged 
that an Executive Director would 
receive both types of an award in 
the same financial year.

–  Restricted Share 

Awards are subject 
to a performance 
underpin. The 
Committee will 
consider the 
Company’s 
performance relative 
to its mid to 
long-term financial, 
operational and 
sustainability plans 
as well as individual 
performance and 
may reduce the 
vesting level, 
including to zero, if 
performance is not 
considered 
consistent with the 
Board’s plans. This 
assessment will take 
into account the 
dynamic operating 
environment that 
currently prevails as 
a result of the 
Russian invasion of 
Ukraine. 

Should Performance 
Share Awards be 
granted, the Committee 
would determine 
appropriate performance 
conditions, in advance 
of granting each award. 

It is expected that 
relative TSR would 
remain the primary 
performance condition 
for Performance Share 
Awards. Other 
performance conditions 
may, however, be used 
in combination with 
relative TSR.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS136

Remuneration Report continued

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation

Opportunity

Performance metrics

Share ownership guideline
To provide alignment of 
interests between 
Executive Directors and 
shareholders.

The Company operates a shareholding 
requirement which is subject to periodic review.

As a minimum, Executive Directors are expected 
to retain 50% of the post-tax shares vesting 
under the LTIP and shares deferred under the 
annual bonus (on an after tax basis) until the 
shareholding requirement is met.

Following cessation of employment, Executive 
Directors are expected to hold the lower of 200% 
of salary and the value of shares held on 
cessation for two years.

Executive Directors are required 
to build and maintain a 
shareholding to the value of at 
least 200% of salary.

Executive Directors are required 
to hold the lower of 200% of 
salary and the value of shares 
held on cessation for two years 
post cessation.

The share ownership guideline 
does not apply to the Executive 
Chair.

Not performance related.

The Committee maintains discretion to disapply 
the policy as it considers appropriate in 
exceptional circumstances (e.g. death). The 
post-cessation guideline will apply to shares 
deferred under the annual bonus (on an after tax 
basis) and shares which vest under existing and 
future LTIP awards (after tax) during the 
Executive Director’s tenure.

Rationale for performance targets
The STIP is based on performance categories that are key to delivering on our long-term strategy. Performance targets are set at the beginning 
of the financial year to reflect business priorities and other corporate objectives, and can include financial, non-financial and personal 
achievement criteria.

Performance targets are set at such a level as to be stretching but achievable, with regard to the particular strategic priorities and economic 
environment in a given performance period. The STIP target is set with reference to the annual budget approved by the Board and the 
Committee uses its judgement to determine appropriate stretch in targets from threshold to maximum performance levels. The Committee 
believes that using multiple targets for the purposes of the STIP provides for a balanced assessment of performance over the year.

For Restricted Share Awards granted under the LTIP, while the Committee intends to return to the grant of Performance Share Awards over the 
longer term (e.g. subject to relative TSR and sustainability targets), the grant of non-performance related Restricted Share Awards will facilitate 
the retention and motivation of the leadership team in the most challenging of external circumstances. However, Restricted Share Awards for 
Executive Directors will be subject to an underpin whereby the Committee will consider the Company’s performance relative to its mid to 
long-term financial, operation and sustainability plans as well as individual performance and may reduce the vesting level, including to zero, if 
performance is not considered consistent with the Board’s plans. This assessment will take into account the dynamic operating environment that 
currently prevails as a result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and will consider the extent to which the value delivered on vesting is as a result 
of windfall gains.

Rationale for Executive Chair not receiving variable pay
Given the interim nature of the Executive Chair role, and the expectation that the Executive Chair will return to his position as Non-executive 
Chair following the end of his tenure, the Committee has determined that it would not currently be appropriate for the Executive Chair to receive 
variable remuneration.

Remuneration of senior executives below the Board
The policy and practice with regard to the remuneration of senior executives below the Board is broadly aligned with that of the Executive 
Directors.

Payments resulting from existing awards
Executive Directors are eligible to receive payment resulting from the vesting of any award made prior to the approval and implementation of the 
remuneration policy detailed in this report.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

137

Non-executive Director policy table
This section of our report summarises the policy for each component of Non-executive Director remuneration.

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation

Opportunity

Performance metrics

Fees

Annual fee for the Chair.

To attract and retain talent 
by ensuring fees are market 
competitive and reflect the 
time commitment required 
of Non-executive Directors 
in different roles.

Annual base fee for Non-executive Directors. 
Additional fees are paid for additional 
responsibilities including to the Senior 
Independent Director and the Chairs of the 
Committees and/or in relation to the Non-
executive Director who will be a representative 
of employees as well as for representation on 
subsidiary Boards, where appropriate.

Fees are reviewed from time to time, taking into 
account the time commitment, responsibilities 
and fees paid by comparable companies, and 
also taking into consideration geography and 
risk profile.

Not performance related.

Changes to Non-executive 
Director fees are applied in line 
with the outcome of the review 
undertaken by the Chair and 
Executive Directors.

Additional remuneration may 
be provided in connection with 
fulfilling the Company’s business 
(e.g. any expenses incurred 
fulfilling Company business may 
be reimbursed including any 
associated tax).

The maximum aggregate fees, 
per annum, for all Non-executive 
Directors allowed by the 
Company’s Articles of 
Association is £5 million.

For the avoidance of doubt, 
additional remuneration received 
by the Chair by way of salary 
under his service contract while 
he serves as Executive Chair shall 
not count towards these limits.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS138

Remuneration Report continued

Pay-for-performance: scenario analysis
The graph below illustrates estimates of the potential future reward opportunity and the potential split between the different elements of 
remuneration under four different performance scenarios: “Below threshold”, “On-target” and “Maximum” and “Maximum assuming 50% share 
price growth”. The Executive Chair only receives a fixed fee in respect of his duties and therefore receives the same remuneration in all scenarios. 
The assumptions for the CFO are summarised in the table below.

Scenario

Fixed pay

STIP

LTIP

Below threshold

On-target

Maximum

Maximum, assuming 50% 
share price growth

Base salary, pension 
and benefits as 
applicable for 2024 
financial year1

No STIP (0% of salary)

On-target STIP (75% of salary)

Maximum STIP (150% of salary)

Maximum STIP (150% of salary)

Full vesting of the RSP Award – assumed 
normal maximum policy of 100% of salary, 
although in practice awards to Executive 
Directors are significantly lower

As above, but modelling the impact of a 50% 
increase to share price

1.  Benefits have been included at US$19,534 based on the annualised 2023 benefit provision to the CFO.

Executive Chair US$ (' 000)

Minimum 

100%

Target

100%

Maximum

100%

100%

Maximum 
with 50% 
share price 
growth

0

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Fixed Pay

STIP

LTIP

LTIP value with 50% share price growth

CFO US$ ('000)

Minimum 

51%

Target

37%

Maximum

28%

26%

Maximum 
with 50% 
share price 
growth

0

49%

27%

42.4%

37%

1,063

36%

1,454

28.2%

25%

1,845

12%

2,106

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Fixed Pay

STIP

LTIP

LTIP value with 50% share price growth

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

139

Remuneration policy for new appointments
The Committee’s approach to setting remuneration for new Executive Directors is to ensure that the Company’s pay arrangements are in the 
best interests of Ferrexpo and its shareholders. To do this, the Company takes into account internal pay levels, the external market, location of 
the executive and remuneration received at the previous employer. The Committee reserves discretion to offer appropriate benefit arrangements, 
which may include the continuation of benefits received in a previous role. Variable pay awards (excluding any potential “buy-out” awards, 
described below) for a newly appointed Executive Director will be as described in the policy table, subject to the same maximum opportunities. 
Different performance targets and conditions may be set initially for incentives in the first year of appointment to recognise the timing of their 
appointment during the year. The rationale will be clearly explained in each case.

In addition, the Committee may make an award in respect of a new appointment to “buy out” existing incentive awards forfeited on leaving a 
previous employer. In such cases, the compensatory award would typically be on a like-for-like basis with similar time to vesting, performance 
conditions and likelihood of the targets being met. The fair value of the buy-out award would not be greater than the awards being replaced. 
To facilitate such a buy-out, the Committee may grant a bespoke award under the Listing Rules exemption available for this purpose.

In cases of appointing a new Executive Director by way of internal promotion, the Group will honour any contractual commitments made prior 
to his or her promotion to Executive Director.

In every case, the Board will pay both the appropriate, but also the necessary, rate of pay to attract an executive who in the view of the Board will 
contribute to shareholder value.

The approach to setting Non-executive Director fees on appointment is in line with the approach taken for the fee review set out in the Non-
executive Director policy table earlier in this report and will also take into account fee levels for existing Non-executive Directors.

Details of Executive Directors service contracts
The Chief Financial Officer, Nikolay Kladiev is employed under a contract of employment with Ferrexpo AG, a Group company (the “employer”), 
as is Lucio Genovese in respect of the executive function of his role. The principal terms of their service contracts not otherwise set out in this 
report are as follows: save in circumstances justifying summary termination, Mr Kladiev’s service contract with the employer is terminable on not 
less than six months’ notice to be given by the employer or not less than six months’ notice to be given by Mr Kladiev. Given the interim nature of 
Mr Genovese’s role, these periods are three months respectively and the contract is for a fixed-term of twelve months, which can be extended by 
mutual agreement. Neither contract has any special provisions in the event of a change of control.

Executive Director

Position

Date of contract

Length of current contract

From employer

From employee

Lucio Genovese

Executive Chair

1 July 2023

Nikolay Kladiev

CFO

7 July 2021

12 months

Indefinite 

3 months

6 months

3 months

6 months

Notice period

Under their service contracts, Mr Genovese and Mr Kladiev are entitled to 25 working days’ paid holiday per year plus public holidays and other 
forms of leave in accordance with applicable legislation. The Executive Director’s service contracts contain a provision exercisable at the option 
of the employer to pay an amount on early termination of employment equal to the respective notice period. If the employer elects to make such 
a payment (which in practice it will do if the speed and certainty afforded by this provision are thought to be in the best interests of shareholders), 
the Executive Directors will be entitled under their contracts to receive all components of their base salaries, and accrued but untaken holiday 
where applicable and required under law for the extent of the notice period. In addition to the contractual rights to a payment on loss of office, 
any employee, including the Executive Directors, may have additional statutory and/or common law rights to certain additional payments, for 
example, in a redundancy situation. 

Policy for loss of office payments
The following principles apply when determining payments for loss of office for the Executive Directors and any new Executive Directors.

The employer will take account of all relevant circumstances on a case-by-case basis including (but not limited to): the sums stipulated in the 
service contract (including base salary during his or her notice period, accrued but untaken holiday, and allowances/benefits); whether the 
Executive Director has presided over an orderly handover; the contribution of the Executive Director to the success of the Company during his 
or her tenure; and the need to compromise any claims that the Executive Director may have. The Company may, for example, if the Committee 
considers it to be appropriate:

–  enter into agreements with Executive Directors which may include the provision of legal fees or the settlement of liabilities in return for a single 

– 

one-off payment or subsequent payments subject to appropriate conditions; 
reimburse reasonable relocation costs where an Executive Director (and, where relevant, their family) had originally relocated to take up the 
appointment;
terminate employment other than in accordance with the terms of the contract (bearing in mind the potential consequences of doing so); or 
– 
–  enter into new arrangements with the departing Executive Director (for example, confidentiality, restrictive covenants and/or consultancy 

arrangements).

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS140

Remuneration Report continued

If the individual is considered a “good” leaver (e.g. for reasons of death, ill-health, injury or disability, retirement, redundancy, their employing 
company ceasing to be a member of the Group, the business (or part) of the business in which they are employed being transferred to a 
transferee which is not a member of the Group, or any other reason which the Committee in its absolute discretion permits) any outstanding LTIP 
awards will, except in the case of death, be pro-rated for time and any performance conditions will be measured (in the case of Performance 
Share Awards) and any performance underpins considered (in the case of Restricted Share Awards). The Committee retains discretion to alter 
these provisions (as permitted by the relevant plan rules) on a case-by-case basis following a review of circumstances, in order to ensure fairness 
to both shareholders and participants with any amended conditions to be similarly challenging having had regard to the relevant circumstances. 
In considering the exercise of discretion as set out above, the Committee will take into account all relevant circumstances which it considers are 
in the best interests of the Company, for example, ensuring an orderly handover, performance of the executive during his or her tenure as 
Director, performance of the Company as a whole and perception of the payment amongst the shareholders, general public and employee 
base. The Committee has discretion to determine that an annual bonus should remain payable under the STIP notwithstanding termination of 
office or employment.

In the event of a change of control, the vesting period under the LTIP ends and awards may be exercised or released to the extent to which the 
performance conditions attaching to Performance Share Awards and any conditions under any performance underpin attaching to Restricted 
Share Awards have, in the Committee’s opinion, been achieved up to that time. Pro-rating for time applies but the Committee has discretion to 
allow awards to be exercised or released to a greater extent if it considers it appropriate having regard to the circumstances of the transaction 
and the Company’s performance up to the date of the transaction.

It is the Committee’s policy to review contractual arrangements prior to new appointments in light of developments in best practice. The 
Executive Director’s service contracts are available to view at the Company’s registered office.

External appointments 
It is the Board’s policy to allow the Executive Directors to accept directorships of other quoted companies, provided that they have obtained 
the consent of both the CEO and Chair of the Board (i.e. the Executive Chair only while he remains in post) and which should be notified to the 
Board. No external directorships of quoted companies are currently held by the Executive Directors.

Details of Non-executive Directors’ letters of appointment
The Chair and Non-executive Directors have each entered into a letter of appointment with the Company. The Non-executive Directors are each 
appointed subject to their election and annual re-election by shareholders. Their appointments may be terminated by either party giving not less 
than three months’ notice. The key terms of current letters of appointment are as follows:

Date of first appointment

Date of election/re-election

Non-executive Director 

L Genovese1

S Brown

V Lisovenko

F MacAulay

N Polischuk

Position

Chair

Non-executive Director

12 February 2019

22 October 2023

Non-executive Director

28 November 2016

Non-executive Director

12 August 2019

Non-executive Director

29 December 2021

2024 AGM

2024 AGM

2024 AGM

2024 AGM

2024 AGM

1.  Details of the service contract which governs the additional services which Mr Genovese has agreed to provide while he serves as Executive Chair are set out in the section headed 

‘Details of Executive Directors service contracts’ above. 

Employee context
In making remuneration decisions, the Committee also considers the pay and employment conditions throughout the Group. Prior to the 
annual pay review and throughout the year, the Committee receives reports from the CEO, or Executive Chair, setting out the circumstances 
surrounding, and potential changes to, broader employee pay. The CEO, or Executive Chair, consults as appropriate with key employees and 
the relevant professionals throughout the Group. This forms part of the basis for determining changes in Executive Director and senior executive 
remuneration which also takes into consideration factors detailed earlier in this report. 

Consideration of shareholder views
The Committee takes into consideration views expressed by shareholders and their proxy advisers regarding remuneration, either at the AGM, 
or by correspondence, or at one-to-one or Group meetings and shareholder events or otherwise by considering these views at the relevant 
Committee meetings which are subsequently reported to and considered by the Board as a whole. The Committee takes shareholder and their 
proxy adviser’s feedback into careful consideration when reviewing remuneration and regularly reviews the Directors’ remuneration policy in the 
context of key institutional shareholder guidelines and best practice. It is the Committee’s policy to consult with major shareholders prior to 
making any major changes to its executive remuneration structure.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

141

Part B: Annual Report on Remuneration (audited)

The following section provides details of how the remuneration policy was implemented during the year. Throughout this report, the 
remuneration of Directors who are paid in foreign currencies are disclosed in local currencies to facilitate year-on-year comparisons, 
uninfluenced by exchange rate fluctuations.

Committee membership in 2023
The Committee currently comprises three Independent Non-executive Directors. Fiona MacAulay is Chair of the Remuneration Committee, with 
the other members of the Committee being Stuart Brown and Vitalii Lisovenko. During the year, Ann-Christin Andersen and Graeme Dacomb 
stepped down from the Board and Committee in May and December 2023 respectively, with Stuart Brown being appointed to the Committee in 
February 2024.

The Committee met on four scheduled occasions and on two ad hoc occasions in 2023. Attendance at meetings by individual members, 
together with a summary of the topics discussed at meetings in 2023 is set out in the Chair’s Introductory Statement on pages 126 to 129.

The Executive Chair, Jim North (while CEO) and the Chief Human Resources Officer (the “CHRO”) attended meetings of the Committee at the 
invitation of the Chair of the Committee, and the Company Secretary acts as secretary to the Committee. The other Non-executive Directors and 
other members of management may also attend meetings by invitation where appropriate. No Director is present when their own remuneration is 
being discussed.

Advisors
Following a competitive tender, the Committee appointed Korn Ferry in October 2019 to provide advice to the Committee. Korn Ferry is a 
member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and adheres to its code of conduct.

Korn Ferry’s fees for services provided to the Committee in 2023 totalled £90,366 which were charged based on the time spent advising the 
Committee. Korn Ferry also provides general remuneration advice to management in respect of remuneration elsewhere in the Group. The 
Committee evaluates the support provided by its advisors periodically and is satisfied that the advice received is independent and objective and 
that the advisors did not have any connections with Ferrexpo which may impair their independence.

The CEO, or the Executive Chair, and the CHRO provide guidance to the Committee on remuneration packages of senior executives employed 
by the Group (but not in respect of their own remuneration).

Single total figure of remuneration – audited
The table below sets out in a single figure for each currency of payment the total remuneration received by each Executive Director during the 
year ending 31 December 2023 and the prior year. Mr North was the CEO in the period from 1 January to 30 June 2023 at which point he 
stepped down from the role and the Board. Mr Genovese assumed the role of Executive Chair from 1 July 2023. Mr Kladiev, the CFO, was 
appointed to the Board with effect from the 2023 AGM on 25 May 2023.

Salary / fee1

Benefits2

STIP3

LTIP4

Pension5

Total 
(single figure)6

Total fixed 
remuneration
(single figure)6

Total variable 
remuneration
(single figure)6

Executive Directors

N Kladiev (2023)7

CHF283,862

– CHF335,000

CHF4,648

CHF11,354 CHF634,864 CHF295,216 CHF339,648

N Kladiev (2022)

–

–

J North (2023)8

US$489,120

US$18,657

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

US$32,520

– US$540,297 US$507,777

US$32,520

J North (2022)

US$959,050 US$221,183 US$720,000 US$246,618

– US$2,146,851 US$1,180,233 US$966,618

Executive Chair

L Genovese (2023)9

US$237,500

–

–

–

US$11,819 US$249,319 US$249,319

–

L Genovese (2022)

See Non-executive Director table below

The figures have been calculated as follows:
1.  Base salary: amount earned for the year. Mr Kladiev salary is from 25 May 2023 when he joined the Board.
2.  Benefits: the taxable value of benefits received in the year (accommodation allowance/provision and healthcare).
3.  STIP: the total bonus earned based on performance during the year. Further details are provided on pages 143 to 145. 
4.  LTIP: the market value of shares that vested based on performance to 31 December of the relevant year (2023: 16.78% vested and 2022: 71.6% vested). For 2021, LTIP value for J North 

includes dividends of US$17,331, and for N Kladiev CHF2,477 over the performance period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2023 (2022: J North – US$89,845).

5.  Pension: N Kladiev receives an employer pension contribution of 4% of salary which is in line with the Swiss employee pension arrangement which is differentiated by age in Switzerland. 

Mr North did not participate in a pension scheme in line with normal practice in Dubai. Whilst working in Dubai, under local legislation he accrued a lump-sum gratuity payment which is 
paid on leaving employment and is equivalent to c.8.33% of salary per year of his service. Within the reporting period an amount of US$68,208 (2022: US$80,088) was accrued towards 
the statutory gratuity. Following J North’s cessation of employment this amount has been paid to him. Mr Genovese receives an employer pension contribution of 5% of his salary as 
Executive Chair which is in line with the Swiss employee pension arrangement in Switzerland.

6.  Average exchange rates: 2023 – £1=US$1.2440 and £1=CHF1.1169; 2022 – £1=US$1.2105.
7.  Mr Kladiev was appointed to the Board with effect from the 2023 AGM on 25 May 2023. The remuneration included in the table reflects the period 25 May to 31 December 2023.
8.  Mr North assumed the role of Acting CEO from the 2020 AGM on 28 May 2020 and was appointed CEO on 14 February 2022. Mr North was appointed to the Board on 5 July 2020. 

Remuneration for 2022 is in respect of the period as Acting CEO from 1 January to 13 February 2022 and as CEO from 14 February 2022 to 31 December 2023. Remuneration for 2023 is 
in respect of the period as CEO from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2023, when Mr North stepped down as CEO and remained on garden leave, leaving the Company on 31 October 2023. 
Full details of his leaving arrangements are set out on pages 149 to 150.

9.  Mr Genovese assumed the role of Executive Chair on 1 July 2023 following Mr North stepping down as CEO. The remuneration included in the table above reflects the amounts paid in 

respect of this role. Remuneration earned prior to this date and currently in respect of his role as Non-executive Chair of the Company is detailed in the table below.

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTS142

Remuneration Report continued

The table below sets out in a single figure for each currency of payment the total remuneration received by each Non-executive Director for the 
year ending 31 December 2023 and the prior year. 

Non-executive Directors

L Genovese (Chair)1

V Lisovenko2

F MacAulay (Senior Independent Director)2,3

AC Andersen3

S Brown

G Dacomb4

N Polischuk

K Zhevago5

All figures shown in currency of payment, US$000

2023

2022

Fees

Benefits

Pension

Total

Fees

Benefits

Pension

Total

578

196

200

80

27

176

153

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

578

196

200

80

27

176

153

–

500

190

188

153

–

161

136

135

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

500

190

188

153

–

161

136

135

1.  Mr Genovese retired from the Ferrexpo plc Board on 1 August 2014 and was subsequently reappointed on 12 February 2019. He was appointed Chair of Ferrexpo plc on 25 August 2020 
and assumed the role of Executive Chair from 1 July 2023. The above table reflects his fee as Board Chair. The portion of remuneration earned for his role as Executive Chair is disclosed 
in the Executive Director table above. In addition to his base fee, Mr Genovese received a one-off payment of US$57,292 for additional time spent on Board matters in the first quarter of 
2023. This payment was in relation to the exceptional time commitment required as a result of the ongoing impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Mr Genovese also serves as a 
Non-executive Director of Ferrexpo AG and, in 2023, received a fee of US$80,000 p.a. (2022: US$80,000).

2.  Mr Lisovenko served as the SID until 10 February 2022, and the post was then assumed by Ms MacAulay with effect from 10 February 2022.
3.  Ms MacAulay served as Chair of the HSEC Committee until 9 February 2022, the post was then assumed by Ms Andersen with effect from 9 February 2022 and subsequently, assumed 

4. 

by Ms Polischuk on 25 May 2023.
In addition to his base fee, as disclosed in last year’s Directors’ Remuneration Repot, Mr Dacomb received a one off payment in 2022 of US$30,000 for additional time spent overseeing 
the preparation of the Group’s financial accounts and dealing with the Group’s external auditors.

5.  Mr Zhevago received a fee in 2022 in line with other Non-executive Directors (i.e. US$135,000). He resigned from his role of Non-executive Director with effect from 29 December 2022. 
Mr Zhevago maintains a consultancy arrangement with the company to provide strategic advice and manage relationships with key stakeholders. This consultancy arrangement was 
suspended in January 2023 following his resignation as a Non-executive Director and stepping down from the Board on 29 December 2022. He did not receive any payments in 2023 under 
this consultancy arrangement.

Implementation of remuneration policy

Salary
Base salaries are reviewed annually with reference to the individual’s role, experience and performance; business performance; salary levels at 
relevant comparators; and the range of salary increases applying across the Group. 

Lucio Genovese receives a fixed fee for his role as Executive Chair set on appointment at US$1,000,000 made up of his current fee of 
US$525,000 as Board Chair and an additional US$475,000 on an interim basis while he serves as Executive Chair. This fee reflects his increased 
time commitment in role and non participation in the Company’s incentive plans. 

On his being appointed to the Board in May 2023, Mr Kladiev’s base salary was CHF450,000. Following the Company’s annual pay review, with 
budgets varying between 1.5% and 10% of payroll, the CFO’s salary was increased by 4% with effect from 1 January 2024 after having regard to 
his location and increase awarded to the wider workforce.

Mr North’s salary as CEO for 2023 was US$978,240 prior to his departure. 

Executive Director

N Kladiev

1.  From appointment to the Board on 25 May 2023.
2.  Based on average exchange rates: 2023 – US$1=CHF0.8979; 2022 – CHF1=US$0.9244.

Base salary at:

Position

1 January 2024

25 May 20231

CFO

CHF468,000

CHF450,000

Pensions and other benefits – audited
The Group does not operate a separate pension scheme for Executive Directors. In line with other employees, under the rules of the Zurich 
pension scheme that is mandatory as a condition of service for employees in Switzerland, Mr Kladiev receives a Company pension contribution 
of 4% of salary and Mr Genovese receives a 5% pension contribution in respect of the salary he receives in relation to the executive function of 
his role.

In line with standard company practice in Dubai, Mr North did not participate in a pension scheme. Whilst working in Dubai, under local 
legislation he accrued a lump-sum gratuity payment which is paid on leaving employment in the country and is accrued at a rate equivalent to 
c.8.33% of salary per year of his service. In the 2023 reporting period, an amount of US$68,208 was accrued towards the statutory gratuity 
(2022: US$80,089).

Mr North was also eligible for other benefits whilst he was an Executive Director as set out in the Executive Director Remuneration Policy earlier 
in the report. This included an allowance toward the cost of accommodation, schooling for his dependent children and use of a car in Dubai up 
to a maximum of US$225,000 p.a. In 2023, Mr North did not make use of this allowance (2022: US$204,687).

Ferrexpo plc Annual Reports & Accounts 2023

143

2023 STIP outcome – audited
The Company, as a single product producer of iron ore pellets with a focused customer portfolio, sets its performance targets to ensure that the 
Directors and senior executives are motivated to enhance shareholder value both in the short term and over the longer term.

Key performance targets based on the budget and the Company’s key strategic priorities for 2023 were set for the Directors and senior 
executives. Targets during the year related to financial performance, ESG and operational performance, as well as strategic targets relating to 
enhancing female diversity in leadership positions. Safety (behavioural safety initiatives and improvements in risk management) was included as 
a modifier, decreasing the total result in the event of a fatality.

The targets and performance against these for 2023 are shown in the table below. Financial and operational targets are normalised, as in 
previous years, to take account of actual iron ore prices and sales pricing outside of a 5% band, operating forex losses or gains, and other major 
raw material cost price items such as gas, electricity and fuel prices as appropriate, to the extent that these were not under the direct control of 
management. These adjustments ensure that the targets fulfil their original intent and are no more or less challenging than when set in light of the 
adjustments made. No adjustments were made to ESG, sales or production indicators such as volumes and costs.

The Committee has discretion to manage bonus outcomes retrospectively; it can confirm, increase, reduce or cancel bonus payments to reflect 
current market conditions and affordability.

In 2023, the threshold performance equated to a bonus potential of 50% of salary, on-target performance to a bonus potential of 75% of salary 
and stretch performance to a bonus potential of 150% of salary. 

The level of achievement against each of the targets for 2023, as determined by the Committee for Mr Kladiev as CFO, is summarised below. The 
Executive Chair is not eligible to participate in the STIP and the former CEO, J North, became ineligible to receive a payment under the STIP for 
2023 as a result of his cessation of employment.

Business scorecard (60% of STIP)

KPI

Measure/target

Weighting
%

Threshold
50%

Financial

Group EBITDA (US$, million)

15.0%

138

Target
75%

151

Stretch
150%

Scorecard 
outcome

Assessment

Max
as a %
of salary

Bonus
awarded
as a %
of salary

163

63

Below threshold

22.5%

0.0%

ESG

LTIFR