More annual reports from Great Panther Mining:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Great Panther Mining:
De Grey Mining LimitedA
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
2015
FINANCIAL REPORT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
31
32
33
34
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
35 - 65
CONTENTS
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
CORPORATE / CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
DIRECTORS REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT
1
2
3-12
13
14 - 19
20 -26
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION UNDER
27
SECTION 307C OF THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
28 - 29
30
CORPORATE DIRECTORY
GEOPACIFIC RESOURCES LIMITED
(a public, listed Company incorporated in New South Wales in 1986)
ACN 003 208 393
Directors in Office
(as at the date of this Report)
Milan Jerkovic, Non-Executive Chairman (Appointed 23 April 2013)
Ron Heeks, Managing Director (Appointed 28 March 2013)
Mark Bojanjac, Non-Executive Director (Appointed 28 March 2013)
Registered Office
Level 1, 278 Stirling Highway Claremont, WA 6010, Australia
Postal Address
P.O. Box 439, Claremont, WA 6910
Company Secretary
Mr John Lewis
Auditor
Somes Cooke,
Level 2, 35 Outram Street,
West Perth, WA 6005, Australia
Bankers
ANZ Banking Group Ltd Cnr Hay and Outram St West Perth WA
2
2013 ANNUAL REPORT
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
Dear Shareholder,
During 2015 Geopacific Resources Ltd (“Geopacific”) has completed a successful exploration program at the
company’s Kou Sa project including approximately 25,000 meters of drilling. Geophysical Surveys undertaken in
2015 have provided drilling targets that allowed us to define new mineralisation associated with known projects
and new areas with encouraging initial results.
The drilling at Kou Sa has expanded our knowledge of the 150 Prospect and exposed a core of mineralisation at
Prospect 160. Our maiden resource will be defined from these two prospects in mid 2016. We continue to explore
our other prospects and in late 2015 drilling successfully defined new epithermal gold and silver mineralisation
at prospect 190 (Gold).
The increase in the gold price has also led the Company
to undertake an independent review of its Fiji projects
and assess strategies to unlock value for shareholders in
2016. The results of this review were very encouraging and
highlighted the potential that several of the high grade, near
surface zones of mineralization already drilled may now
have with the current gold price.
In what has been a very difficult and directionless 2015 in
terms of commodity and financial markets, Geopacific has
made significant steps forward in terms of the ability to
raise the funds necessary to finance operations. During the
year we have successfully raised in excess of $26 million
through Placements to Institutional Investors and Rights
Issue offerings to existing shareholders. While the capital
markets around the world have shown poor investment
interest in exploration companies, we have continued to be
supported by dedicated current shareholders and significant
new investors during recent funding raisings.
I would like to thank all shareholders for their continued
support and in particular, to acknowledge the ongoing
significant support from our major shareholder Resource
Capital Funds and our new significant shareholder Tembo
Capital who made significant investments in the company
this year.
Support from our shareholders enabled Geopacific to meet
its milestone payments with the vendor of the Kou Sa project
in Cambodia and advance the exploration towards our initial
resource.
Geopacific has also successfully renegotiated the terms of
the agreement with the vendors of the Kou Sa project. The
milestone payment of US$6.3 million due in July 2016 has
been cancelled and in exchange the Vendors have agreed to
accept a payment US$1.575 at the financial completion of
the BFS and a capped 2 % royalty on production.
Our team, led by CEO Ron Heeks has done a magnificent job
in progressing the exploration while raising sufficient capital
in trying capital markets and I would like to acknowledge
their efforts which I am sure is supported by all shareholders.
Thank you for all your ongoing support which we are
confident will be rewarded in the medium to long term given
the impressive geological system that we have discovered
at Kou Sa which continues to grow in stature with ongoing
aggressive exploration being pursued by the company.
Milan Jerkovic
Chairman
1
2015 ANNUAL REPORTREVIEW OF OPERATIONS
Geopacific is pleased to provide this summary of the exploration works undertaken during the past
year at the Kou Sa Project in Cambodia and exploration licenses in Fiji.
During the course of the year, Geopacific continued to systematically explore the Kou Sa Project
with over 25,000 metres of drilling completed. The year commenced on a high note with several
new zones of mineralisation being identified, including Prospects 128 and 100 West. The discovery
of these zones was aided by the use of a variety of geochemical and geophysical datasets which
were collected. At Prospect 150, drilling continued to expand the known mineralisation and
simultaneously enabled an improved understanding of the geology of the prospect and wider
project area. Drilling also continued to deliver results at Prospect 160 where a thick core of copper
mineralisation was encountered that plunges around 200m to the north-west, highlighting the
economic significance of that prospect.
Gradient array geophysics has continued to provide accurate targets for drilling and assist with the
identification of new prospects, including Prospects 128, 100 West and 117 West. Soil geochemistry
has also been used effectively in the definition of drilling targets, identifying a gold anomaly in
the centre of the license with broad, low-grade gold mineralisation at surface. This area recently
named the Prospect 190 Gold zone has returned encouraging results from initial drilling.
The Fijian projects hold potential for future development, which was confirmed in a recent review.
These projects are at various stages of exploration from early to fairly advanced, with the presence
of deeper mineralised systems being identified in areas. Exploration to date has provided evidence
for porphyry, epithermal or both types of systems at all projects. There remains potential to
expand the already identified gold mineralisation at Faddy’s, which is the most advanced prospect
across all of the Fijian projects.
HIGHLIGHTS
> Kou Sa, Cambodia:
Intensive 3 rig drill program commenced:
•
•
geochemistry and geophysics continue to provide
high-quality targets for drilling;
thick core of copper mineralisation encountered at
Prospect 160 with a plunge length of around 200m;
• mineralisation at Prospect 150 extended to the
west with a potential feeder zone identified to the
north-west;
•
targets generated from IP geophysics encountered
significant new copper mineralisation at Prospects
128 and 100 West; and
Subsequent to year end:
• High-grade gold and silver mineralisation
from new gold
encountered down plunge
mineralisation at Prospect 190.
• Similarities between Prospect 190 and Prospect
170 highlights further gold potential.
2
•
> Fiji Projects:
geological
for
epithermal gold and porphyry mineralisation at all
projects; and
review highlighted potential
• majority of projects located within north-east-
trending volcanic belt that hosts significant
epithermal and porphyry mineralisation, including
Vatukoula and Tuvatu.
> Corporate
•
•
recapitalised the Company, raising in excess of
$25 million through a Placement and Rights
Issues;
renegotiated improved terms with the vendors of
the Kou Sa project.
2015 ANNUAL REPORT
EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
CAMBODIA EXPLORATION
KOU SA PROJECT CAMBODIA
Figure 1. Kou Sa Project location map
During the course of the year, Geopacific continued to
systematically explore the Kou Sa Project with over 25,000
metres of drilling completed. The year commenced on a
high note with several new zones of mineralisation being
identified, including Prospects 128 and 100 West. The
discovery of these zones was aided by the use of a variety
of geochemical and geophysical datasets which were
collected. At Prospect 150, drilling continued to expand
the known mineralisation and simultaneously enabled an
improved understanding of the geology of the prospect and
wider project area. Drilling also continued to deliver results
at Prospect 160 where a thick core of copper mineralisation
was encountered that plunges around 200m to the north-
west, highlighting the economic significance of that prospect.
Gradient array geophysics has continued to provide accurate
targets for drilling and assist with the identification of new
prospects, including Prospects 128, 100 West and 117
West. Soil geochemistry has also been used effectively in
the definition of drilling targets, identifying a gold anomaly
in the centre of the license with broad, low-grade gold
mineralisation at surface. This area recently named the
Prospect 190 Gold zone has returned encouraging results
from initial drilling.
3
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
Figure 2. Prospect location map over gradient array surveys
Background
The Kou Sa Project is located in northern Cambodia’s
Chep District, Phreah Vihear province and has excellent
discovery potential for mineral deposits of economic grade
and tonnage. Drill testing so far has produced zones of high
grade mineralisation including; 5m at 128.64 g/t Gold and
4.01% Copper. The Kou Sa Project has only been explored
by Geopacific since early 2013 and has continually shown
excellent discovery potential for polymetallic deposit (s) of
economic grade and tonnage. Modern exploration techniques
including systematic geochemistry and geophysics have
clearly outlined numerous mineral targets.
Geophysical Surveys
Geophysical techniques, such as gradient array, played
an important role in the identification of further sulphide
mineralisation. Gradient array surveys continued at Kou
Sa, filling areas between original surveys and covering new
areas like Prospect 170. This technique proved to be a “silver
bullet” for exploration in 2015, with new mineralisation
identified from this dataset including at Prospect 128 and
the new area to the west of Prospect 117.
Given the success of the gradient array surveys, deeper-
looking induced polarisation (“IP”) surveys were conducted
over a number of prospects. A down hole IP survey at
Prospect 117 was instrumental in the new interpretation of
the prospect’s mineralisation and assisted in the targeting
of further drilling. Deep-looking IP surveys over Prospects
150 and 160 showed strong responses around the known
mineralisation and a potential plunge in the mineralisation
to the north-west at Prospect 150.
LiDAR Survey
During the 2015 reporting year, a LiDAR survey was flown
over the license to provide a detailed digital terrain model
(“DTM”) of the project area. This DTM provided detailed
elevation data for use in interpreting the various exploration
datasets collected over the project, including drilling and
surface geochemistry. It has also been key in planning
further drilling programs and interpreting the structural
framework of the project.
Drilling
Diamond and RC drilling dominated the exploration program
conducted in the 2015 reporting year.
Diamond Drilling
RC Drilling
Combination RC/diamond holes
No. drill
holes
No. metres
drilled
111
133
15
13,507
10,016
2,713
4
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDrilling continued at the already established Prospects
150, 160, 128, 117, and 100, while ‘scout’ drilling targeted
geochemical and geophysical anomalies around
Prospect 117.
The Pyramid below shows the status of development and
process of advancement towards becoming a reserve for all
identified prospects at Kou Sa.
Figure 3. Development status of prospects
EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
PROSPECT 150
Copper, Gold and Silver
Drilling at Prospect 150 continued to define and extend the
high-grade, polymetallic (Cu-Au-Ag) mineralisation along
a strike length of 400m. The majority of the prospect has
been drilled to a nominal 40m x 40m pattern. Mineralisation
at this prospect is interpreted to be shallow dipping to the
northwest within a package of volcaniclastic rocks. Infill
drilling at Prospect 150 was successful in firming up the
mineralised zones already identified and confirming the
high-grade nature of the mineralisation.
Extensional drilling to the west of the prospect targeted a
potential feeder zone thought to be striking north north-
west. RC drilling was designed to intercept this zone close
to the surface and was successful in identifying significant
zones of mineralisation including 17m at 12.38% Cu eq.
from 19m (KRC145). This zone continued to the north-west
as diamond drilling continued to encounter this zone further
down plunge, with results including 5.3m at 3.52% Cu eq.
from 83.7m (KDH142).
Figure 4. Latest drilling results from Prospect 150 showing potential feeder zone
5
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
Figure 5. Plan map of Prospect 160 showing latest drilling results and interpretation
Figure 6. Section through thickest zone of mineralisation at Prospect 160
6
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
PROSPECT 160
Copper, Gold and Silver
Drilling at Prospect 160 was the highlight of the year with a
thick “core” to the copper sulphide mineralisation identified
from infill and extensional drilling. Results from this zone
have confirmed the high-grade nature of the mineralisation
at Prospect 160 and include intercepts such as 27m at 3.55%
Cu eq. from 69m (KRC184) and 41m at 1.69% Cu eq. from
55m (KRC199).
Prospect 160 was identified in late 2014 while following
up on weak copper mineralisation in drill hole KDH001.
Initial results included 14.8m at 3.18% copper from 29.2m
(KDH008). Infill and extensional drilling completed during
2015 has further defined mineralisation along a strike length
of about 400m with the zone exhibiting a shallow-dip to the
north-west.
Gradient array geophysics continued to prove effective at
identifying further sulphide mineralisation on the license
with drill testing of a large chargeability anomaly to the east
of Prospect 160 successfully intercepting significant copper
mineralisation.
PROSPECT 100
Copper and Gold
A strong chargeability anomaly to the west of Prospect 100
was identified with 3D IP geophysics. Results returned
significant copper sulphide mineralisation within a
package of volcanic rocks and limestone. Some of the
highest copper grades drilled to date were intercepted in
this prospect, including 13.6m at 3.82% Cu eq. from 39.5m
(KDH048) and 7.4m at 6.89% Cu eq. from 65.3m (KDH056)
as reported in the 2014 Annual Report. Subsequent drilling
confirmed these initial results with intercepts of 4.6m at
6.43% Cu eq. from 20.5m (KDH071) and 8.3m at 1.44%
Cu eq. from 82.8m (KDH069). The zone is thought to dip
steeply to the south and has not yet been fully tested along
strike and down-dip.
Figure 7. Drill results over IP Chargeability at Prospect 100
7
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
PROSPECT 128
Copper, Gold and Silver
PROSPECT 117
Copper, Gold and Silver
Drilling at the recently-discovered Prospect 128 has
identified several discrete zones of copper mineralisation
with a main cohesive zone in the north. These cover an area
of around 300m by 50m and a thickness of approximately
20m to 25m.
Results from this area have been encouraging, with initial
drilling returning intercepts such as 14.4m at 2.59% Cu
eq. from 31.1m including 5m at 5.31% Cu eq. from 40.5m
(KDH077). Subsequent infill RC and diamond drilling
continued to target mineralisation with intercepts including
22m at 1.65% Cu eq. from 20m including 4m at 3.27% Cu
eq. from 20m and 2m at 5.32% Cu eq. from 28m (KRC129).
Further copper mineralisation, with occurrences of gold
and silver, was identified to the south of the prospect, with
results including 1.9g/t Au, 62g/t Ag, and 0.93% Cu over 4m
in KRC140. This southern zone remains open to the south
and west.
A combination of the re-evaluation of previous work,
down-hole geophysical techniques, with further infill and
extensional drilling at Prospect 117 has advanced our
understanding of the mineralisation in this area. A new
interpretation suggests that the mineralisation can be joined
together to form discrete, continuous zones with a shallow
dip to the west – the true extent of which remains to be tested.
Significantly deeper holes to the west have encountered
stronger rock alteration and mineralogy including epidote,
hematite, and magnetite suggesting proximity to a ‘hot’,
deeper mineralising source.
Results from drilling completed in early 2015, which included
17.1m at 1.49% Cu eq. from 70.4m (KDH022), highlighted the
potential of the prospect to host significant mineralisation.
Evaluation of the drilling and geophysical datasets led to
an improved understanding of the prospect. Results from
subsequent drilling, towards the end of the year, included
11.9m at 2.27% Cu eq. from 87m (KDH133). These results
confirmed the interpretation and extended the known
mineralisation down dip to the west. Potential remains to
further extend this mineralisation down dip at Prospect 117.
Figure 8. Latest drilling results from Prospect 128
8
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
Figure 9. Section through Prospect 117 showing the mineralised horizons
PROSPECT 190
Copper, Gold and Silver
Another significant success during the 2015 reporting year
was that of Prospect 190. Prospect 190 at this stage is
split over a number of locations close to one another and is
characterised by a strong soil gold anomaly in the north and
chargeability anomalies in the south
Prospect 190 (South)
Copper and Gold
in the south
Drilling of the chargeability anomalies
encountered zones of copper sulphide mineralisation with
the best results coming from Zone C, which included 4.95m
at 3.01% Cu eq. from 31.2m (KDH110).
Prospect 190 (Gold)
Gold and Silver
The results from the gold soil anomaly at Prospect 190 Gold
identified a broad zone of gold and silver mineralisation
from surface within
favourable silica-sericite-pyrite
alteration. Early drilling of the anomaly identified zones
of moderate gold and silver mineralisation surrounded by
broad zones of lower grade material with a moderate to
steep dip southwards. Drilling in the latter half of the year
highlighted a higher-grade core to the mineralisation with
a potential plunge to the south-west. Results from this
zone (See figure 9) include 1.6m at 7.36g/t Au and 11.9g/t
Ag from 60.4m and 0.6m at 51.1g/t Au and 75.2g/t Ag from
64.8m (KDH122).
Subsequent to the reporting year, epithermal gold and
silver mineralisation was encountered for the first time
at Kou Sa, enhancing the potential of Prospect 190
(Gold). High-grade gold and silver mineralisation, 7.4m at
10.93g/t Au and 121.7g/t Ag from 88.4m including 4.6m
at 17.14g/t Au and 193.9g/t Ag from 91.2m (KDH178), was
intercepted within a zone of strongly altered rocks that are
also mineralised, confirming that the system improves
with depth.
9
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
Figure 10. Prospect 190 plan map showing drilling intercepts over gold geochemical anomaly
PROSPECT 117
Copper, Gold and Silver
Exploratory drilling around Kou Sa continued to identify
potential new prospects. A zone to the west of Prospect 117
was identified from gradient array geophysics and has some
of the highest copper-in-soil results close by in the regional
soil geochemistry data. An intercept of 4.9m at 2.21% Cu
eq. from 5.6m (KDH118) was encountered on one of the
chargeability anomalies along with an intercept of 7.9m at
1.15% Cu eq. from 8.7m (KDH129) on another chargeability
anomaly some 200m to the south-west. These results
represent a completely new area for the Kou Sa Project
and have confirmed the effectiveness of the gradient array
data to highlight further near-surface, copper-sulphide
mineralisation.
Ron Heeks, MD engaging with the community at the local primary school in Chep Villa
10
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
FIJIAN EXPLORATION
Figure 11. Fiji projects location map
The Fijian projects hold potential for future development,
which was confirmed in a recent review. These projects are
at various stages of exploration from early to fairly advanced,
with the presence of deeper mineralised systems being
identified in areas.
Exploration to date has provided evidence for porphyry,
epithermal or both types of systems at all projects. There
remains potential to expand the already identified gold
mineralisation at Faddy’s, which is the most advanced
prospect across all of the Fijian projects.
SABETO-VUDA PROJECT
SPL1361 & 1368 [Sabeto & Vuda]
100% Geopacific Ltd [Subsidiary of GPR]
Sabeto-Vuda occurs within a prospective north-east-
trending structural corridor that plays host to significant,
known porphyry and epithermal mineralisation, which
includes Vatukoula and Tuvatu. The exploration target for
testing at both Sabeto and Vuda is a deeper, alkalic porphyry
copper-gold system, which are typically limited in lateral
extent but tend to be higher grade than calc-alkalic porphyry
systems and also occur in clusters.
The Vuda Project is dominated by an extensive alteration
system anomalous in gold, which is coincident with an
annular magnetic low. Drilling within this system has
shown that the alteration passes from advanced argillic at
surface to phyllic alteration, and in some instances potassic
alteration, with the phyllic alteration containing gold
mineralisation. Numerous geophysical data sets (gravity,
airmagnetics and ZTEM) indicate that there is likely to be an
intrusive (porphyry) at depth that is feeding the epithermal
gold mineralisation at surface.
Sabeto is proximal to the Vuda alteration system and like
Vuda is in a prospective metallogenic belt. Numerous
exploration data sets have been collected over the licence
including geophysics, geochemistry, and drilling. Copper-
in a
gold mineralisation
Sanidine Feldspar Porphyry (SFP) at depth, with the best
grades associated with potassic alteration and bornite
mineralisation. Petrology has indicated that this porphyry
phase is not the mineralising phase and a further review of
the exploration data sets suggest that there is potential for a
deeper mineralised system.
in Sabeto occurs
identified
Sabeto and Vuda remain highly prospective licenses with the
potential for both of them to play host to a deeper porphyry
or epithermal system.
11
2015 ANNUAL REPORTEXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
NABILA PROJECT
SPL1216 & 1415 [Nabila & Kavukavu]
100% Millennium Mining (Fiji) Ltd [Subsidiary of GPR]
The Nabila Project area is located in the same north-east-
trending structural corridor of volcanic centres as Vuda/
Sabeto, Rakiraki, and the Vatukoula epithermal gold deposit.
The project comprises two licenses; Nabila [SPL1216] and
Kavukavu [SPL1415].
Nabila plays host to the Faddy’s epithermal gold deposit,
which has an historic, non-JORC compliant resource of
920,000t at 4.9g/t gold (144,000 ounces of contained gold).
Much of the historic exploration has been focussed on an
arcuate north east trending structural zone of some 2.3km
long, from the Mistry mine in the south to the Faddy deposits
in the north. There remains several locations of interest both
along and outside this structural zone with one such area to
the south-east of the main Faddy’s mineralisation exhibiting
malachite stained structures in fresh road cuttings.
Kavukavu lies south of Nabila and comprises volcaniclastics,
lavas, and limestones, intruded by a number of Colo-suite
calc-alkalic intrusions. Mineralisation identified to date are
associated with magnetite skarns around the village of Tau or
hydrothermal breccias located over a potassium radiometric
anomaly east of the village. A recent geological review of the
data has suggested that these hydrothermal breccias could
be related to porphyry / epithermal mineralisation at depth.
RAKIRAKI PROJECT
SPL1231, 1373 & 1436 [Rakiraki, Qalau & Tabuka]
50% Beta Ltd [Subsidiary of GPR]
The Rakiraki Project area comprises three contiguous
licenses located 35km north of the World class Vatukoula
epithermal gold deposit. Rakiraki, like Vatukoula is hosted
in a shoshonitic volcanic centre, with regional gravity
suggesting an underlying magmatic heat source.
The potential target for discovery at the Rakiraki Project is an
underground low sulphidation epithermal gold style deposit.
There are numerous prospects across the project area
that display characteristics of low sulphidation epithermal
mineralisation, with occurrences of high-grade (+15g/t)
gold mineralisation displaying classic low temperature
epithermal quartz textures (e.g. crustiform or colloform).
Exploration drilling to date has been shallow and limited.
The Tataiya vein system north-east of the town of Rakiraki
presents as the best target for a significant epithermal gold
system as it has considerable strike extent, has known high-
grade gold in rock sampling, and has limited drill testing
that has only tested to less than 50m below the surface.
CAKAUDROVE PROJECT
SPL1493 [Cakaudrove]
100% Geopacific Ltd [Subsidiary of GPR]
The Cakaudrove Project comprises one license held over
the Cakaudrove Peninsula on Fiji’s second main island of
Vanua Levu. The project is considered underexplored with
the majority of exploration in the past focussing on an area
of gold mineralisation identified in quartz veins on a silicified
ridge north of a small village called Dakuniba.
Geopacific conducted a number of exploration programs
over the license collecting geochemical, geological, and
geophysical data with the aim of finding either extensions
of the known mineralisation or further mineralisation in the
relatively underexplored parts of the license. Exploration
remains in the early stages with several geochemical and
geophysical anomalies still to be tested.
12
2015 ANNUAL REPORTCORPORATE / CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CORPORATE
Despite very difficult market conditions Geopacific has
successfully recapitalised the company raising in excess of
$26 million during the year as follows:
• $3.0 million 1 for 6 Rights Issue at $0.057 per share
completed in February 2015;
• $9.0 million Placement to Institutional Investors at
$0.06 per share in July; and
• $14.0 million 10 for 21 Rights Issued at $0.057 per share
in September 2015.
than a marketable parcel of shares ($500) were sold on
market and the proceeds distributed to shareholders. This
process was completed in early 2016.
During the year Mr Russell Fountain retired from the Board
of Directors after 10 years of service. Mr Fountain is a former
Chairman of the Company who continues to be available to
advise the company where necessary.
The Company also commence discussions with the Vendors
of the Kou Sa project to negotiate improved terms for the
projects acquisition.
These funds enabled the Company to continue its aggressive
exploration at Kou Sa project as well as undertake works at
our Fiji licences.
The Company commenced the process of reducing small
shareholdings by undertaking an Unmarketable Parcel
Facility where shareholders with holding that where less
Ultimately the Company was able to negotiate the
substitution of the US$6.3 million payment payable on 31
July 2016 with a payment of US$1.575 million payable upon
the financial closure of the Bankable feasibility Study for
the Kou Sa project and 2% Royalty on production at Kou Sa
capped at US$8.425 million.
Managing Director, Ron Heeks with the Cambodian
Ministry of Mines and Energy at the International
Mining and Resources Conference (IMARC) in
Melbourne. From left to right:
1) Mr. Chhe Lidin, Director, Department of
Cooperation and ASEAN Affairs
2) HE Yos Mony Rath, Director General, Department
of Mineral Resources
3) HE Suy Dimanche, Director General, General
Department of General Affairs
4) Ron Heeks, Managing Director, Geopacific
Resources Limited
5) HE Suy Sem, Minister of Mines and Energy
6) HE Meng Saktheara, Secretary of State, Ministry
of Mines and Energy
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
Constitution
The Company’s Corporate Governance Statement can be
found on the Company’s website at www.geopacific.com.au
under the ‘Corporate Governance’ tab.
The following governance-related documents can also be
found on the Company’s website.
Charters
• Board
• Audit and Risk Committee
• Nomination Committee
• Remuneration Committee
• Constitution of Geopacific Resources Limited
Policy and Procedures
• Code of Conduct
• Continuous Disclosure Policy
• Diversity Policy
• Share Trading Policy
• Shareholder Communication and Investor Relations
Policy
13
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Directors present their report together with the financial report of the Geopacific Group, being Geopacific Resources
Limited (“Geopacific”) (“the Company”) and its controlled entities for the financial year ended 31 December 2015, and the
auditors’ report thereon.
1 DIRECTORS
The Directors of the Company at any time during or since the end of the financial year are:
Milan Jerkovic – Chairman (Appointed 23 April 2013)
Mr Milan Jerkovic is a qualified geologist with postgraduate qualifications in Mining & Mineral Economics with over
30 years of experience in the mining industry involving resource evaluation, operations, financing, acquisition, project
development and general management.
Mr Jerkovic was most recently the Chief Executive Officer of Straits Resources Limited and has held positions with WMC,
BHP, Nord Pacific, Hargraves, Tritton and Straits Asia. Mr Jerkovic was the founding Chairman of Straits Asia Resources
and is currently Chairman of Blackham Resources Limited.
Mr Jerkovic is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the Australasian Institute
of Company Directors and holds a B. App. Sc (Geology), Post Graduate Diploma (Mineral Economics), Post Graduate
Diploma (Mining).
Mr Jerkovic was appointed Chairman of the Company on 1 August 2013 and is also a member of the Audit Committee.
Mr Jerkovic has the following interest in Shares in the Company as at the date of this report – 8,756,108 ordinary shares
and 500,000 Performance Rights.
Ron Stephen Heeks – Managing Director (Appointed 28 March 2013)
With nearly 30 years mining industry experience, Mr Heeks was a founder of Exploration and Mining Consultants and has
had previous experience with WMC, Newcrest, Newmont (US) and many years with RSG Consulting.
Mr Heeks has held senior roles in both mine management and exploration and is a Former General Manager – Technical
for Straits Asia Indonesian Operations and Chief Technical Officer for Adamus Resources Southern Ashanti Gold
Operation. He has lived and worked in various countries around the world gaining extensive experience in South-East
Asia and Indonesia in particular. Mr Heeks holds a B.App.Sc (Geol) and is a member of the Australian Institute of Mining
& Metallurgy (MAusIMM).
Mr Heeks was appointed Managing Director of the Company on 28 March 2013 after the Takeover of Worldwide Mining
Projects Ltd.
Mr Heeks has the following interest in Shares in the Company as at the date of this report – 5,523,757 ordinary shares
and 2,000,000 Performance Rights.
Mark Trevor Bojanjac, Executive Director (Appointed 28 March 2013)
Mr Bojanjac is a Chartered Accountant with over 20 years’ experience in developing resource companies. Mr Bojanjac was
a founding director of Gilt-Edged Mining Limited which discovered one of Australia’s highest grade gold mines and was
managing director of a public company which successfully developed and financed a 2.4m oz gold resource in Mongolia.
He also co-founded a 3million oz gold project in China.
Mr Bojanjac was most recently Chief Executive Officer of Adamus Resources Limited and oversaw its advancement from
an early stage exploration project through its definitive feasibility studies, and managed the debt and equity financing of
its successful Ghanaian gold mine.
Mr Bojanjac was appointed a Director of the Company on 28 March 2013 after the Takeover of Worldwide Mining Projects
Ltd. Mr Bojanjac is the Chairman of the Audit Committee. He also serves as Non- Executive Chairman of Canadian
explorer, Coventry Resources.
Mr Bojanjac has the following interest in Shares in the Company as at the date of this report – 3,041,666 ordinary shares
and 375,000 Performance Rights.
14
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
Russell John Fountain, BSc, PhD, FAIG, Non-executive Director (Resigned 18 August 2015)
Dr Fountain was appointed a Director and Chairman of the Company on 23 September, 2005. Russell is a Sydney-based
consulting geologist with 42 years of international experience in all aspects of mineral exploration, project feasibility and
mine development. Previous positions include President, Phelps Dodge Exploration Corporation; Exploration Manager,
Nord Pacific Ltd and Chief Geologist, CSR Minerals. Russell has had global responsibility for corporate exploration
programs with portfolios targeting copper, gold, nickel and mineral sands.
Russell has played a key role in the grassroots discovery of mines at Granny Smith (Au in WA), Osborne (Cu-Au in Qld)
and Lerokis (Au-Cu in Indonesia) and the development of known prospects into mines at Girilambone (Cu in NSW) and
Waihi (Au in NZ). Russell holds a PhD in Geology from the University of Sydney (1973), with a thesis based on his work at
the Panguna Mine (Cu-Au in PNG). He worked as a project geologist on the Namosi porphyry copper deposit in Fiji from
1972 to 1976. Russell is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, and Non-Executive Chairman of Finders
Resources Ltd.
Dr Fountain was Chairman of Finders Resources Limited until 27 August 2013, he held no other directorships of listed
companies in the last 3 years.
Dr Fountain resigned from the Board and all committees on 18 August 2015.
COMPANY SECRETARY
Mr John Lewis (Appointed 31 March 2013)
Mr Lewis is a Chartered Accountant with over 20 years’ post qualification experience specialising in the mining industry
for the last 10 years. Previously Mr Lewis worked in Corporate Advisory at Deloitte.
Mr Lewis was formerly Chief Financial Officer of Nickelore Limited and Chief Financial Officer, Director and Company
Secretary of Dragon Mountain Gold Limited.
Mr Lewis has the following interest in Shares in the Company as at the date of this report – 5,048,814 ordinary shares and
1,500,000 Performance Rights.
2 PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY
The principal activity of the Group is mineral exploration currently focussing on gold and copper deposits in Cambodia
and Fiji.
There were no other significant changes in the nature of this activity of the Group during the financial year
3 OPERATING RESULTS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
The loss for the Group for the year ended 31 December 2015 was $2,000,637 (2014: loss $1,636,029).
Review of Operations
Exploration during the year was again concentrated on the Kou Sa copper gold project in Cambodia where excellent
results continued to generate new targets while expanding those prospects already investigated.
Cambodian Project.
It was an exciting year for Geopacific resources Limited (“Geopacific”) and particularly for the Kou Sa Copper-Gold Project
in north-central Cambodia.
The year commenced with the recognition that gradient array IP geophysics proved to be an excellent targeting tool.
Combined with the existing geochemistry results, the IP geophysics allowed Geopacific to rapidly identify numerous
potential sulphide targets across the entire southern half of the licence. The first of the IP geophysics targets drilled
provided encouraging copper-sulphide results. As drilling progressed on these new target areas the potential of the Kou
Sa licenses began to be revealed.
15
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
Based on the results from early drilling the company raised $ 5.5m in a placement to sophisticated and existing
shareholders. Exploration continued at Kou Sa providing further results that paved the way for a subsequent and
significant capital raise of $23m. This raise included a placement of $9m, offered at a 20% premium to the market, to
well renowned resource industry funds – Resource Capital Funds (RCF) and new entrant, Tembo Capital. The balance of
the capital was raised through a fully underwritten rights issue. The capital raises were strongly supported by the existing
shareholders. Considering the difficult financial climate of 2015, the ability of Geopacific to raise such significant funds,
particularly for exploration, is seen as a positive endorsement of the management team and the projects.
The funds raised have enabled Geopacific to meet it’s ongoing purchase payment arrangements with the project vendors
and mount an aggressive exploration program – expanding the exploration potential and targeting several zones for near-
term production. For the second half of the year, one RC drill and two diamond rigs explored the Kou Sa license area. One
diamond rig was tasked with the ongoing evaluation of geochemical and geophysical targets while the other diamond and
the RC rig provided detailed assessments of several targets with the potential to provide an initial resource.
In conjunction with the drilling, a scoping study on the economics of commencing a mining operation in Cambodia was
initiated. This study included initial metallurgical test work, assessment of transport, mining and on-site operational
costs and an assessment of the fiscal regime of Cambodia.
The initial metallurgical test work revealed that the mineralisation at the Prospect 150 location provides impressive
metallurgical recoveries. Test work concentrated on producing a copper concentrate via conventional flotation methods.
Copper recoveries were in the high 90% range with gold recoveries in the mid-90% range and silver in the low 90%. No
deleterious elements reported to the concentrate.
These results are considered to be strong, with the gold recoveries much higher than in most copper-gold projects. It is
expected that copper recoveries for other zones, which don’t contain gold, will also be this good. The ability to provide a
high-quality, clean concentrate will enable Geopacific to supply a sought after product to smelters.
Project economics were favourably enhanced when the government installed a high-voltage, hydro-electric power line
through the Kou Sa license. The power line runs approximately 5 km from the expected mill location and is already being
used to supply cost-effective power to the exploration office. The addition of the powerline, to the recently constructed
bitumen highway has considerably improved operational logistics – all of which assists with the overall economics of the
project.
The ongoing success of the field program is largely credited to the dedication of Geopacific’s technical team. A high
proportion of the in-country team are Indonesian Nationals who have worked with the Board internationally, for over
a decade. Their technical experience and natural sensitivity to environmental and social aspects of the project and
surrounding areas has greatly assisted the efficiency and local support for Geopacific’s operations. This team, assisted by
the small but capable Perth-based support group have ensured that a productive and cost-effective exploration program
has been maintained. An often-overlooked aspect that impacts overall project viability – the ‘social licence to operate’ –
has been enhanced by the way this team interacts with local communities – particularly important in a remote area of a
country, which has very little history of exploration.
During the forthcoming year, Geopacific looks forward to continued exploration success at Kou Sa while progressing
towards production with an early cash flow scenario. It is envisaged that the initial mining operation will be of a scale
sufficient to test the systems of the country and determine the acceptance of mining, while simultaneously producing a
revenue stream for the company. This will provide the basis for expansion and increase of the resource base with further
exploration.
FIJI PROJECT
Work at the company’s Fiji projects has continued initially with desk top reviews of all projects. Subsequently Geopacific
undertook a number of Environmental Impact Assessments for proposed exploration works on the Fiji Projects which
were accepted by the Minerals & Resources Department in Fiji (“MRD”). As a result of these works the MRD granted 3
year extensions for 4 of the Groups licence areas. With all the licences for the Fiji projects renewed management expects
that exploration will ramp up in 2016.
In the later half of the 2015 year an assessment of geological structure and update of all the Fiji projects was commissioned.
The report highlighted the potential of some of the near surface gold mineralisation and the prospectivity of the company’s
epithermal gold deposits, most of are underexplored and are located near good infrastructure.
16
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
4 FINANCIAL POSITION
At the end of the financial year the Group had $12,589,002 (2014: $4,165,516) in cash and cash equivalent. Capitalised
exploration and evaluation expenditure was $26,157,372 (2014: $18,951,894).
Expenditure on exploration of tenements during the year was $7,205,477 (2014: $5,529,505).
5 DIVIDENDS
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend. No dividends have been paid or declared since the end of
the previous year.
6 STATE OF AFFAIRS
There were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group during the financial year except for the following:
• Geopacific announced a $23 million funding packing in July 2015 consisting of:
•
The issue of 150 million shares via a placement to sophisticated investors at $0.06 per share to raise
AUD$9 million
• A fully underwritten 10:21 non-renounceable rights issue to raise approximately AUD$14 million was completed
in August 2015.
7 EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE
Other than the following, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of this
report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the Directors of the Company
to affect substantially the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in
subsequent financial years.
On 8 February 2015 the Company announced it had successfully renegotiated the payment terms of the acquisition
agreement with the Vendor of the Kou Sa copper gold project in Cambodia. The terms defer the final payment of US$6.4M,
linking future payments to the achievement of two project development milestones being a payment of US$1.575 Million
at Bankable Feasibility Study and 2% royalty capped at US$8.425 Million at Production. No further vendor payments are
due on the Kou Sa Project until the project development milestones are reached, as the Company has made the January
milestone payment of US$3.15 Million.
8 DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS AND BENEFITS
The beneficial interest of each Director in the ordinary share capital of the Company as at the date of this report is:
M Jerkovic
M Bojanjac
R Heeks
Direct
Indirect
Shares
Options
Shares
Options
500,000
541,666
2,000,000
Nil
Nil
Nil
8,256,108
2,500,000
3,523,757
Nil
Nil
Nil
The beneficial interest of each Director in the Performance Rights of the Company as at the date of this report is:
M Jerkovic
M Bojanjac
R Heeks
Vesting
1 July 2016
500,000
375,000
2,000,000
17
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
9 DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
During the year ended 31 December 2015 a total of six Directors’ Meetings and two Audit Committee Meetings were held.
Directors’ attendance record is tabulated below.
Director
M Jerkovic
M T Bojanjac
R S Heeks
R J Fountain
Directors Meetings
Audit Committee Meetings
Attended *
Eligible to
Attend
Attended *
Eligible to
Attend
5
4
5
4
5
5
5
4
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
*Either in person, or by electronic means.
The Board of Directors takes ultimate responsibility for corporate governance including the functions of establishing
compensation arrangements of the Executive Director and its senior executives and officers, appointment and retirement
of non-executive Directors, appointment of auditors, areas of business risk, maintenance of ethical standards and Audit
Committees. The Board seeks independent professional advice as necessary in carrying out its duties and responsibilities.
10 LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS, PROSPECTS AND BUSINESS STRATEGIES
The Group will continue to develop its existing exploration tenements and seek to increase its tenement holdings by
acquiring further projects.
11 ENVIRONMENT REGULATIONS
Entities in the Group are subject to normal environmental regulations in areas of operations both in Cambodia and in Fiji.
There has been no breach of these regulations during the financial year, or in the period subsequent to the end of the
financial year and up to the date of this report.
12 SHARE OPTIONS
There were 2,688,768 options over unissued shares unexercised at 31 December 2015 (2014 – 4,688,768
Unlisted Options
During the financial year the following unlisted options over unissued shares were cancelled as they either did not meet
the vesting Conditions or they expired:
Number of Options Issued
Date of Issue
Exercise Price
2,000,000
5 April 2012
$0.30
Expiry Date
5 April 2015
The Company did not issue shares during the financial year on the exercise of any unlisted options.
Since the end of the financial year, no unlisted options have been exercised.
As at the date of this report unlisted options over unissued shares in the Company are:
Number of Options on Issue
Exercise Price
Expiry Date
800,000
200,000
1,688,768
$2.50
$5.00
$0.07452
(i)
(ii)
5 July 2017
(i) The Options are exercisable in whole or in part, not later than five years after the defining on Faddy’s Gold Deposit of
a JORC compliant ore reserve of over 200,000 ounces of contained gold.
(ii) The Options are exercisable in whole or in part, not later than ten years after the defining on Faddy’s Gold Deposit of
a JORC compliant ore reserve of over 1,000,000 ounces of contained gold.
Option holders do not have any rights to participate in any issues of shares or other interest in the Company or any other
entity.
18
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
13 INSURANCE OF OFFICERS
The Company has paid a premium to insure the Directors and Company Secretary of the Group in respect of certain legal
liabilities, including costs and expenses in successfully defending legal proceedings, whilst they remain as Directors and
for seven years thereafter. The insurance contract prohibits the disclosure of the total amount of the premiums and a
summary of the nature of the liabilities.
14 PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF COMPANY
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on
behalf of the Company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Company is a party, for the purpose of taking
responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or part of those proceedings.
No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the Company with leave of the Court under section 237
of the Corporations Act 2001.
15 LEAD AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
The lead auditor’s independence declaration for the year ended 31 December 2015 is set out on page 17.
16 AUDITOR
During the year the following fees were paid or payable to the auditors of Company for services provided by the auditor of
the Company, its related practices and non related audit firms:
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
Audit services
Somes Cooke
Audit and review of the financial report and other audit work under
the Corporations Act 2001
28,500
30,000
17 NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The Group may decide to employ the auditor on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where the auditor’s
expertise and experience with the Company and/or the Group are important.
No non-audit services were provided by the external auditors in respect of the current or preceding financial year.
19
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
18 REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED)
The remuneration report is set out under the following main headings:
A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration
B Details of remuneration
C Service agreements
D Share based compensation
A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration
The objective of the Group’s executive reward framework is to ensure reward for performance, being the development
of the Geopacific Resources exploration tenements. The framework aligns executive reward with achievement of
strategic objectives and the creation of value for shareholders, and conforms with market best practice for delivery
of reward. The Board ensures that executive reward satisfies the following key criteria for good reward governance
practices:
•
•
•
•
•
competitiveness and reasonableness;
acceptability to shareholders;
performance linkage / alignment of executive compensation;
transparency; and
capital management.
The Group has structured an executive remuneration framework that is market competitive and complimentary to
the reward strategy of the organisation and is aligned to:
• Shareholders’ interests:
• has economic profit as a core component of plan design;
•
focuses on sustained growth in shareholder wealth, consisting of dividends and growth in share price, and
delivering constant return on assets as well as focusing the executive on key non financial drivers of value;
and
attracts and retains high calibre executives.
•
• Executive directors’ interests:
•
•
•
•
rewards capability and experience;
reflects competitive reward for contribution to growth in shareholder wealth;
provides a clear structure for earning rewards; and
provides recognition for contribution.
The framework provides a mix of fixed and variable and a blend of short and long term incentives.
Non executive Directors
Fees and payments to non executive Directors reflect the demands, which are made on, and the responsibilities
of, the Directors. The Board reviews Non executive Directors’ fees and payments annually. The Board may from
time to time seek the advice of independent remuneration consultants to ensure non executive Directors’ fees and
payments are appropriate and in line with the market. The Chairman’s fees are determined independently to the fees
of non executive Directors based on comparative roles in the external market. The Chairman is not present at any
discussions relating to determination of his own remuneration.
Directors’ fees
Non executive Directors’ fees are determined within an aggregate Directors’ fee pool limit, which is periodically
recommended for approval by shareholders. The maximum currently stands at $400,000 per year in aggregate as
agreed at the 2012 Annual General Meeting.
A Director may also be paid fees or other amounts as the Directors determine, if a Director performs special duties
or otherwise performs duties outside the scope of normal duties of a Director. A Director may also be reimbursed for
out of pocket expenses incurred as a result of their directorship or any special duties.
B Details of remuneration
Details of the remuneration of the key management personnel (as defined in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures) of
Geopacific Resources and the Geopacific Resources Ltd Group are set out in the following tables.
The key management personnel of Geopacific Resources and the Group comprises of the Directors, Company
Secretary and the Exploration Manager.
20
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
Remuneration paid to key management personnel of Geopacific Resources and of the Group
2015
Short term
benefits
Post employment
benefits
Name
Salaries
and Fees
$
Super-
annuation
$
Termination
Payments
$
Share
based
payments
Rights
Total
$
$
Share based
payments
as % of
remuneration
Non executive Directors
R J Fountain (i)
M Jerkovic
M T Bojanjac
Sub total non
executive Directors
Executive Directors
R S Heeks
Sub-total directors
Other Key Management
Personnel
J C Lewis
S Whitehead
Sub-total Other Key
Management Personnel
Totals
53,030
75,000
40,000
-
7,125
3,800
168,030
10,925
240,000
408,030
240,000
119,266
359,266
10,925
-
11,330
11,330
767,296
22,255
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,850
23,800
17,850
70,880
105,925
61,650
59,500
238,455
95,200
335,200
154,700
573,655
71,400
17,850
311,400
148,446
89,250
459,846
243,950
1,033,501
25
22
29
28
23
12
(i) Resigned 18 August 2015
2014
Short term
benefits
Post employment
benefits
Name
Salaries
and Fees
$
Super-
annuation
$
Termination
Payments
$
Non executive Directors
R J Fountain (i)
M Jerkovic
M T Bojanjac
Sub total non
executive Directors
Executive Directors
R S Heeks
Sub-total directors
Other Key Management
Personnel
J C Lewis )
S Whitehead
Sub-total Key
Management Personnel
Totals
(i) Resigned 18 August 2015
56,667
75,000
98,915
-
7,031
3,750
230,582
10,781
240,000
470,582
-
10,781
240,000
119,266
359,266
-
11,181
11,181
829,848
21,962
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Share-
based
payments
Shares/
Options
$
Total
$
Share based
payments
as % of
remuneration
8,925
11,900
65,592
93,931
8,925
111,590
29,750
271,113
14%
13%
8%
47,600
287,600
17%
77,350
558,713
35,700
275,700
8,925
139,372
44,625
415,072
121,975
973,785
13%
6%
21
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
C Service agreements
The Non-executive Directors of the Company have entered agreements with the Company regarding their appointment
as follows:
Milan Jerkovic
• Fees $75,000 P.A.
• Statutory Superannuation
• LTI 1,000,00 Performance Rights
–
–
500,000 vesting after 12 months continuous service from 1 July 2014
500,000 vesting after 24 months continuous service from 1 July 2014
• No Notice Period.
Mark Bojanjac
• Fees $40,000 P.A.
• Statutory Superannuation
• LTI 750,00 Performance Rights
–
–
375,000 vesting after 12 months continuous service from 1 July 2014
375,000 vesting after 24 months continuous service from 1 July 2014
• No Notice Period
D Share based compensation
Geopacific Resources Limited Employee Performance Rights and Option Plans were approved by shareholders at the
annual general meeting held on 31 May 2012. All employees are eligible to participate in the plan. Plan performance
rights and options are granted under the plans for no consideration. Rights and options granted under the plan carry
no dividend or voting rights. When exercisable, each right or option is convertible into one ordinary share.
Options
During the year, no options over ordinary shares in the Company were provided as remuneration to the directors of
Geopacific Resources as set out below.
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
Name
M Jerkovic
M T Bojanjac
R S Heeks
R J Fountain
C B Bass
Other Key management Personnel
J C Lewis
S Whitehead
Number of options granted
during the year
Number of options vested
during the year
2015
2014
2015
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
333,334
-
-
The assessed fair value at grant date of options granted is allocated equally over the period from grant date to vesting
date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables above. Fair values at grant date are independently
determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the
option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the
expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option.
22
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
Performance Rights
During the year performance rights over ordinary shares in the Company were provided as remuneration to the
directors of Geopacific Resources as set out below.
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
Number of performance
rights granted during the year
Number of performance
rights vested during the year
Name
M Jerkovic
M T Bojanjac
R S Heeks
R J Fountain
Other Key management Personnel
J C Lewis
S Whitehead
2015
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,000,000
750,000
2015
500,000
375,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
750,000
375,000
3,000,000
1,500,000
375,000
375,000
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
The assessed fair value at grant date of the performance rights granted is allocated equally over the period from
grant date to vesting date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables above. Fair values at grant date are
independently determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the
term of the performance right, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the
underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option.
The conditions that must be met in order for the Performance Rights to vest are as follows:
•
•
50% will vest upon the performance by the eligible employee of 12 months continuous service from 1 July 2014;
and
50% will vest upon the performance by the eligible employee of 24 months continuous service from 1 July 2014.
Shares provided on exercise of remuneration options
No ordinary shares in the Company were provided as a result of the exercise of remuneration options to each director
of Geopacific and other key management personnel of the Group.
Shares issued on the exercise of options
No ordinary shares of the Company were issued during the year ended 31 December 2015 on the exercise of options
granted to key management personnel under the Employee Share Option Plan. No further shares have been issued
since that date. No amounts are unpaid on any of the shares.
23
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
Equity instrument disclosures relating to key management personnel
(i) Option holdings
The number of options over ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of
the Company and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are
set out below.
2015
Name
Balance at
the start
of the year
Granted
during the
year as
compensation
Other
changes
during
the year
Lapsed
during
the year
Held at
Resignation/
Termination
Balance
at the
end of
the year
Vested and
exercisable
at the end
of the year
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
R J Fountain
M Jerkovic
R S Heeks
M T Bojanjac
-
-
-
-
Other Key management Personnel
J C Lewis
S Whitehead
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
No options are vested and unexercisable at the end of the year.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2014
Name
Balance at
the start
of the year
Granted
during the
year as
compensation
Other
changes
during
the year
Lapsed
during
the year
Held at
Resignation/
Termination
Balance
at the
end of
the year
Vested and
exercisable
at the end
of the year
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
R J Fountain
M Jerkovic
R S Heeks
M T Bojanjac
-
-
-
-
Other Key management Personnel
J C Lewis
-
S Whitehead
500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
(ii) Performance Rights
The number of performance rights over ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each
Director of the Company and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related
parties, are set out below.
2015
Name
Balance at the
start of the
year
Granted during
the year
Vested and
Exercised
during the year
Balance at the
end of the year
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
Milan Jerkovic
Ron Heeks
Mark Bojanjac
R J Fountain
1,000,000
4,000,000
750,000
750,000
Other Key management Personnel
J Lewis
S Whitehead
3,000,000
750,000
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
375,000
375,000
375,000
375,000
1,500,000
1,500,000
375,000
375,000
2014
Name
Balance at the
start of the
year
Granted during
the year
Held at
Resignation/
Termination
Balance at the
end of the year
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
Milan Jerkovic
Ron Heeks
Mark Bojanjac
R J Fountain
-
-
-
-
Other Key management Personnel
J Lewis
S Whitehead
-
-
1,000,000
4,000,000
750,000
750,000
3,000,000
750,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,000,000
4,000,000
750,000
750,000
3,000,000
750,000
25
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ REPORT
(iii) Share holdings
The number of ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of the Company
and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, is set out below
2015
Name
Balance at the
start of the
year
Received
during the year
on the exercise
of options
Acquired
during the year
Held at
Resignation/
Termination
Balance at the
end of the year
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
Milan Jerkovic
Ron Heeks
Mark Bojanjac
R J Fountain
8,256,108
3,523,757
2,666,666
166,000
Other Key management Personnel
J Lewis
3,030,633
S Whitehead
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
2,000,000
375,000
375,000
1,518,181
375,000
-
-
-
8,756,108
5,523,757
3,041,666
541,000
-
-
-
4,548,814
375,000
2014
Name
Balance at the
start of the
year
Received
during the year
on the exercise
of options
Other changes
during the year
Held at
Resignation/
Termination
Balance at the
end of the year
Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited
Milan Jerkovic
Ron Heeks
Mark Bojanjac
R J Fountain
8,256,108
3,523,757
2,666,666
166,000
Other Key management Personnel
J Lewis
2,833,442
S Whitehead
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
END OF REMUNERATION REPORT
-
-
-
197,191
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8,256,108
3,523,757
2,666,666
166,000
3,030,633
-
The Directors Report, including the Remuneration Report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors:
Ron Heeks
Managing Director
Perth, Australia
Dated: 31 March 2016
26
2015 ANNUAL REPORT
LEAD AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
27
2015 ANNUAL REPORTINDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
28
2015 ANNUAL REPORTINDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
29
2015 ANNUAL REPORTDIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
The Directors of Geopacific Resources Limited declare that:
a)
the financial statements and notes, set out on pages 21 to 51 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
i.
complying with Australian Accounting Standards which as stated in accounting policy Note 1 to the financial
statements constitutes compliance with International Reporting Standards (IFRS) ; and
ii. giving a true and fair view of the financial position as at 31 December 2015 and of the performance for the year then
ended of the Consolidated Group; and
iii. the directors have been given the declarations required by S.295A of the Corporations Act 2001 from the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.
b)
in the directors’ opinion there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and
when they become due and payable.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors:
RS Heeks
Managing Director
Perth, Australia
Dated: 31 March 2016
30
2015 ANNUAL REPORTCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
Revenue from continuing operations
5
50,502
69,853
CONSOLIDATED
Note
2015
$
2014
$
Administration expenses
Consultancy expense
Depreciation expense
Employee benefits expense
Occupancy expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax
(119,255)
(649,568)
(105,661)
(1,035,988)
(140,667)
(219,667)
(416,807)
(79,158)
(806,455)
(183,795)
(2,051,139)
(1,705,882)
6
8
(2,000,637)
(1,636,029)
-
-
Loss for the year attributable to members of the parent company
(2,000,637)
(1,636,029)
Other comprehensive income-items that may be reclassified to profit
or loss:
Exchange differences on translating foreign controlled entities
642,769
147,326
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
642,769
147,326
Total comprehensive loss for the year attributable to members of the
parent entity
(1,357,868)
(1,488,703)
Basic loss per share (cents)
Diluted loss per share (cents)
25
25
(0.25)
(0.25)
(0.67)
(0.67)
The above statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income should be read
in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
31
2015 ANNUAL REPORTCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2015
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Prepayment
Plant and equipment
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Financial liabilities
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued capital
Reserves
Accumulated losses
TOTAL EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED
Note
2015
$
2014
$
9
10
12,589,002
754,788
4,165,516
290,482
13,343,790
4,455,998
11(a)
11(b)
13
26,157,372
18,951,894
8,581,940
150,846
-
209,681
34,890,158
19,161,575
48,233,948
23,617,573
1,072,935
14,881
2,453
762,230
63,635
13,391
1,090,269
839,256
1,090,269
839,256
47,143,679
22,778,317
60,099,072
34,686,214
1,085,287
401,522
(14,040,680)
(12,309,419)
47,143,679
22,778,317
14
15
16
17
18
The above statement of financial position should be read
in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
32
2015 ANNUAL REPORTCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
Consolidated
Issued Capital
$
Share Based
Payments
Reserve
$
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Reserve
$
Accumulated
Losses
$
Total
Equity
$
At 1 January 2015
34,686,214
602,469
(200,947)
(12,309,419)
22,778,317
Transactions with owners in
their capacity as owners
Shares issued during the year
26,090,485
Share issue costs
(677,627)
Performance rights vested
Options expired
Other Comprehensive loss for
the year
-
-
-
-
-
310,372
(269,376)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26,090,485
(677,627)
310,372
269,376
-
-
642,769
(2,000,637)
(1,357,868)
At 31 December 2015
60,099,072
643,465
441,822
(14,040,680)
47,143,679
At 1 January 2014
27,302,822
389,811
(348,273)
(10,673,390)
16,670,970
Transactions with owners in
their capacity as owners
Shares issued during the year
Share issue costs
Options issued
Options expired
Other Comprehensive loss for
the year
7,844,193
(460,801)
-
-
-
-
-
277,738
(65,080)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7,844,193
(460,801)
277,738
(65,080)
-
147,326
(1,636,029)
(1,488,703)
At 31 December 2014
34,686,214
602,469
(200,947)
(12,309,419)
22,778,317
The above statement of changes in equity should be read
in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
33
2015 ANNUAL REPORTCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 DECEMBER 2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts from customers
Payments to suppliers and employees
Interest received
CONSOLIDATED
Note
2015
$
2014
$
19,474
130,789
(1,711,271)
(1,066,048)
31,027
15,650
Net Cash used in Operating Activities
29(c)
(1,660,770)
(919,609)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Payments for plant and equipment
Proceed from disposal of plant and equipment
Exploration expenditure
Deposits paid for acquisition of Golden Resource Development
(46,827)
(44,069)
-
-
(10,756,795)
(5,529,505)
(5,030,622)
-
Net Cash used in Investing Activities
(15,834,244)
(5,573,574)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from share issue (net of cost)
Finance lease payments
Loans to a related party
Net Cash from Financing Activities
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Effect of exchange rates on cash held in foreign currencies
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of the Financial Year
25,415,454
7,330,794
(24,587)
(115,136)
(9,071)
(69,126)
25,275,731
7,252,597
759,414
642,769
4,165,516
2,328,335
147,326
3,258,776
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR
12,589,002
4,165,516
The above statement of cash flows should be read
in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
34
2015 ANNUAL REPORTCONTENTS OF THE NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
2 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
3 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
4 PARENT COMPANY INFORMATION
5 REVENUE
6 LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX
7 REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS
8
INCOME TAX
9 CURRENT ASSETS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
10 CURRENT ASSETS TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
11 NON CURRENT ASSETS EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE
12 NON CURRENT ASSETS JOINT ARRANGEMENTS
13 NON CURRENT ASSETS PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
14 CURRENT LIABILITIES TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
15 PROVISIONS
16 FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
17
ISSUED CAPITAL
18 RESERVES
19 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
20 COMMITMENTS
21 PARTICULARS RELATING TO CONTROLLED ENTITIES
22 KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES
23 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
24 SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
25 LOSS PER SHARE
26 EVENTS OCCURRING AFTER THE YEAR END
27 OPERATING SEGMENTS
28 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURES
29 NOTES TO THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PAGE
36
44
45
46
47
47
47
48
49
49
49
50
50
51
51
51
52
53
53
54
55
56
56
57
59
59
60
62
65
2015 ANNUAL REPORT
35
35
2015 ANNUAL REPORT
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Geopacific Resources Limited (‘the Company’) is a listed public company domiciled in Australia. The consolidated financial
report of the Company for the financial year ended 31 December 2015 comprises the Company and its controlled entities
(together referred to as the ‘Group’).
The separate financial statements of the parent entity, Geopacific Resources Limited, have not been presented within this
financial report as permitted by the Corporation Act 2001.
The financial report was authorized for issue by the directors on 31 March 2016.
Basis of preparation
The financial report is a general purpose financial report that has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting
Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting
Standards Board (AASB) and the Corporations Act 2001.
Australian Accounting Standards set out accounting policies that the AASB has concluded would result in a financial report
containing relevant and reliable information about transactions, events and conditions to which they apply. Compliance
with Australian Accounting Standards ensures that the financial statements and the notes thereto also comply with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
Except for cash flow information, the financial statements have been prepared on an accruals basis and are based on
historical costs, modified where applicable, by the measurement at fair value of selected non-current assets, financial
assets and financial liabilities.
Standards and Interpretations affecting amounts reported in the current period (and/or prior periods).
The Group has adopted all applicable new and revised Standards and Interpretations in the current year and these
standards have not significantly impacted the recognition, measurement and disclosure of the Group and its consolidated
financial statements for the financial year ended 31 December 2015.
New Accounting Standards for application in future periods.
The AASB has issued new and amended accounting standards and interpretations that have mandatory application dates
for future reporting periods and which the Group has decided not to early adopt. These standards and interpretations will
not materially impact on the Group’s financial statements.
Significant accounting policies
The following is a summary of the material accounting policies adopted by the Group in the preparation of the financial
report. The accounting policies have been consistently applied, unless otherwise stated.
(a) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and short-term deposits in the consolidated statement of financial position comprise cash at bank and in hand.
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and
which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
For the purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash
equivalents as defined above.
(b) Share Capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction from
the proceeds.
36
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(c) Employee benefits
(i) Wages and salaries and annual leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non monetary benefits, and annual leave expected to be wholly
settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services
up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.
All other amounts are considered other long term benefits for measurement purposes and are measured at the
present value of expected future payments to be made in respect to services provided by employees.
(ii) Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the
present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the
reporting date. Consideration is given to expected future salary levels, experience of employee departures
and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the reporting date on
national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated
future cash outflows.
(iii) Share based payments
The fair value of options granted to Directors and employees is recognised as an employee benefit expense with
a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period
during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options.
The fair value at grant date is independently determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model that takes
into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and
expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for
the term of the option.
The fair value of the options granted is adjusted to reflect market vesting conditions, but excludes the impact
of any non market vesting conditions (for example, profitability and sales growth targets). Non market vesting
conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable.
At each year end, the Company revises its estimate of the number of options that are expected to become
exercisable. The employee benefit expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent estimate.
Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is
transferred to share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are
credited to share capital.
(d) Financial Instruments
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions
to the instrument. For financial assets, this is equivalent to the date that the company commits itself to either the
purchase or sale of the asset (i.e. trade date accounting is adopted).
Financial instruments are initially measured at fair value plus transaction costs, except where the instrument
is classified ‘at fair value through profit or loss’, in which case transaction costs are expensed to profit or loss
immediately.
37
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(d) Financial Instruments (continued)
Derecognition
Financial assets are derecognised when the right to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or been
transferred. Financial liabilities are derecognised when the related obligations are either transferred, discharged or
expired. The difference between the carrying value of the financial liability extinguished or transferred to another
party and the fair value of consideration paid, including the transfer of non-cash assets or liabilities assumed, is
recognised in profit or loss.
Classification and subsequent measurement
Financial instruments are subsequently measured at fair value, amortised cost using the effective interest method,
or cost.
Financial assets are categorised as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables,
held-to-maturity investments or available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for
which the investments were acquired. Designation is re-evaluated at each financial year end, but there are restrictions
on reclassifying to other categories.
(i) Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not
quoted in an active market. Such assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gain
or losses are recognized in profit or loss through the amortisation process and when the financial asset is
derecognised.
(ii) Financial liabilities
Non derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortised cost
using the effective interest method.
(iii) Convertible Notes
The component parts of compound instruments (convertible notes) issued by the Group are classified separately
as financial liabilities and equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the
definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument.
Conversion options that will be settled by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a
fixed number of the Company’s own equity instruments is an equity instrument.
At the date of issue, the fair value of the liability component is estimated using the prevailing market interest
rate for similar non-convertible instruments. This amount is recognised as a liability on an amortised cost basis
using the effective interest method until extinguished upon conversion or at the instrument’s maturity date.
The conversion option classified as equity is determined by deducting the amount of the liability component from
the fair value of the compound instrument as a whole. This is recognised and included in equity, net of income tax
effects, and is not subsequently remeasured. In addition, the conversion option classified as equity will remain in
equity until the conversion option is exercised, in which case, the balance recognised in equity will be transferred
to issued capital. Where the conversion option remains unexercised at the maturity date of the convertible note,
the balance recognised in equity will be transferred to accumulated losses within equity.
No gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss upon conversion or expiration of the conversion option.
38
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(d) Financial Instruments (continued)
Transaction costs that relate to the issue of the convertible notes are allocated to the liability and equity components in
proportion to the allocation of the gross proceeds. Transaction costs relating to the equity component are recognised
directly in equity. Transaction costs relating to the liability component are included in the carrying amount of the
liability component and are amortised over the lives of the convertible notes using the effective interest method.
Impairment
At the end of each reporting period, the Group assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset
has been impaired. A financial asset (or a group of financial assets) is deemed to be impaired if, and only if, there is
objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events (a “loss event”) having occurred, which has an
impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset(s).
In the case of financial assets carried at amortised cost, loss events may include: indications that the debtors or
a group of debtors are experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal
payments; indications that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation; and changes in arrears or
economic conditions that correlate with defaults.
For financial assets carried at amortised cost (including loans and receivables), a separate allowance account is used
to reduce the carrying amount of financial assets impaired by credit losses. After having taken all possible measures
of recovery, if management establishes that the carrying amount cannot be recovered by any means, at that point
the written-off amounts are charged to the allowance account or the carrying amount of impaired financial assets is
reduced directly if no impairment amount was previously recognised in the allowance account.
When the terms of financial assets that would otherwise have been past due or impaired have been renegotiated, the
Group recognises the impairment for such financial assets by taking into account the original terms as if the terms
have not been renegotiated so that the loss events that have occurred are duly considered.
(e) Foreign currency transactions and balances
(i) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of
the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated
financial statements are presented in Australian dollars, which is Geopacific Resources Limited’s functional and
presentation currency.
(ii) Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing
at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such
transactions and from the translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated
in foreign currencies are recognised in the statement of profit and loss and other comprehensive income.
(iii) Group companies
The financial results and position of foreign operations, whose functional currency is different from the Group’s
presentation currency, are translated as follows:
—
—
—
assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates prevailing at that reporting date;
income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period; and
retained earnings are translated at the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction.
Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign operations are transferred directly to the Group’s foreign
currency translation reserve in the statement of changes in equity. These differences are recognised in the
statement of profit and loss and other comprehensive income in the period in which the operation is disposed of.
39
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(f) Goods and Services Tax (GST)/Value Added Tax (VAT)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST/VAT, unless the GST/VAT
incurred is not recoverable from the taxation authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition
of the asset or as part of the expense.
Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST/VAT receivable or payable. The net amount of
GST/VAT recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included with other receivables or payables in the
statement of financial position.
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST/VAT components of cash flows arising from investing or financing
activities which are recoverable from, or payable to the taxation authority, are presented as operating cash flows.
(g) Impairment of assets
Assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount
exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and
value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are
separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of
assets (cash generating units). Non financial assets other than goodwill that suffered an impairment are reviewed
for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
(h) Interests in Joint Arrangements
Joint arrangements represent the contractual sharing of control between parties in a business venture where
unanimous decisions about relevant activities are required.
Separate joint venture entities providing joint venturers with an interest to net assets are classified as a joint venture
and accounted for using the equity method.
Joint venture operations represent arrangements whereby joint operators maintain direct interests in each asset and
exposure to each liability of the arrangement. The consolidated group’s interests in the assets, liabilities, revenue
and expenses of joint operations are included in the respective line items of the consolidated financial statements.
Gains and losses resulting from sales to a joint operation are recognised to the extent of the other parties’ interests.
When the consolidated group makes purchases from a joint operation, it does not recognise its share of the gains and
losses from the joint arrangement until it resells those goods/assets to a third party.
(i)
Income tax
The income tax expense or revenue for the year is the tax payable on the current year’s taxable income based on
the notional income tax rate adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary
differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements,
and to unused tax losses.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences at the tax rates expected to apply when
the assets are recovered or liabilities are settled, based on those tax rates. The relevant tax rates are applied to the
cumulative amounts of deductible and taxable temporary differences to measure the deferred tax asset or liability.
An exception is made for certain temporary differences arising from the initial recognition of an asset or a liability.
No deferred tax asset or liability is recognised in relation to these temporary differences if they arose in a transaction,
other than a business combination, that at the time of the transaction did not affect either accounting profit or taxable
profit or loss.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for temporary differences between the carrying amount and
tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the Company is able to control the timing of the reversal of the
temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Current and deferred tax balances attributable to amounts recognised directly in equity are also recognised directly
in equity.
40
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(j) Loss per share
(i) Basic loss per share
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the result attributable to equity holders of the Company, excluding
any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the year.
(ii) Diluted loss per share
Diluted loss per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic loss per share to take into account
the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares
and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to
dilutive potential ordinary shares.
(k) Mineral Tenements and Deferred Mineral Exploration Expenditure
Mineral exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of
interest. These costs are carried forward only if they relate to an area of interest for which rights of tenure are
current and in respect of which:
•
•
such costs are expected to be recouped through the successful development and exploitation of the area of
interest, or alternatively by its sale; or
exploration and/or evaluation activities in the area have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable
assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves and active or significant
operations in, or in relation to, the area of interest are continuing.
In the event that an area of interest is abandoned or if the Directors consider the expenditure to be of reduced value,
accumulated costs carried forward are written off or impaired in the year in which that assessment is made. A
regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward
costs in relation to that area of interest.
Immediate restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs necessitated by exploration and evaluation activities
are expensed as incurred and treated as exploration and evaluation expenditure. Exploration activities resulting in
future obligations in respect of restoration costs result in a provision to be made by capitalising the estimated costs,
on a discounted cash basis, of restoration and depreciating over the useful life of the asset. The unwinding of the
effect of the discounting on the provision is recorded as a finance cost in the statement of profit and loss and other
comprehensive income.
(l) Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure
that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only
when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the
item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income during the financial year in which they are incurred.
Depreciation on assets is calculated using the straight line method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts, net of
their residual values, over their estimated useful lives, as follows:
– Plant and equipment
5% to 37.5%
– Computer software
– Motor vehicles
25%
25%
– Furniture and fittings
7% to 20%
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each year end.
An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is
greater than its estimated recoverable amount (note 1(g)).
41
2015 ANNUAL REPORT
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(l) Plant and equipment (continued)
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These gain and losses
are included in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. When revalued assets are sold, it
is Group policy to transfer the amounts included in other reserves in respect of those assets to retained earnings.
(m) Principles of consolidation
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Geopacific Resources Limited and its
subsidiaries as at and for the year ended 31 December each year (the Group).
Subsidiaries are entities the parent controls. The parent controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to,
variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over
the entity.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company,
using consistent accounting policies. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances
and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been
eliminated in full. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is obtained by the Group and
cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group.
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method
of accounting involves recognising at acquisition date, separately from goodwill, the identifiable assets acquired,
the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. The identifiable assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed are measured at their acquisition date fair values.
When measuring the consideration transferred in the business combination, any asset or liability resulting from a
contingent consideration arrangement is also included. Subsequent to initial recognition, contingent consideration
classified as equity is not remeasured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within entity. Contingent
consideration classified as an asset or liability is remeasured in each reporting period to fair value, recognising any
change to fair value in profit or loss, unless the change in value can be identified as existing acquisition date.
All transaction costs incurred in relation to business combinations are recognised as expenses in profit or loss when
incurred.
The difference between the above items and the fair value of the consideration (including the fair value of any pre-
existing investment in the acquiree) is goodwill or a discount on acquisition.
A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a loss of control is accounted for as an equity
transaction.
A list of controlled entities is contained in note 21.
(i) Business combinations
Business combinations occur where an acquirer obtains control over one or more businesses and results in the
consolidation of its assets and liabilities.
A business combination is accounted for by applying the acquisition method, unless it is a combination
involving entities or businesses under common control. The acquisition method requires that for each business
combination one of the combining entities must be identified as the acquirer (i.e. parent entity). The business
combination will be accounted for as at the acquisition date, which is the date that control over the acquiree is
obtained by the parent entity. At this date, the parent shall recognise, in the consolidated accounts, and subject
to certain limited exceptions, the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In addition,
contingent liabilities of the acquiree will be recognised where a present obligation has been incurred and its fair
value can be reliably measured.
Changes in the ownership interests in a subsidiary are accounted for as equity transactions and do not affect the
carrying values of goodwill.
42
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(n) Revenue recognition
(i) Sale of Goods and Disposal of Assets
Revenue from the sale of goods and disposal of other assets is recognised when the Group has passed the risks
and rewards of ownership to the buyer.
(ii)
Interest Income
Interest income is recognised using the effective interest method.
(iii) Rental Income
Rental Income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
(o) Comparative figures
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in
presentation for the current financial year.
(p) Leases
Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as
operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged
to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income on a straight line basis over the period of the lease.
(q) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which it
is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured.
Provisions are measured using the best estimate of the amounts required to settle the obligation at the end of the
reporting period.
43
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
2 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Group has exposure to a variety of risks arising from its use of financial instruments. This note presents information
about the Group’s exposure to the specific risks, and the policies and processes for measuring and managing those
risks. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout this financial report. The Board of Directors has overall
responsibility for the risk management framework.
(a) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to
meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from transactions with customers and investments.
Trade and other receivables
The Group has no investments and the current nature of the business activity does not result in trading receivables.
The receivables that the Group recognises through its normal course of business are short term in nature and the
most significant (in quantity) is the receivable from security deposits for tenements. The risk of non-recovery of
receivables from this source is considered to be negligible.
Cash deposits
The Group’s primary banker is the ANZ Banking Group. At balance date all operating accounts and funds held on
deposit are with this bank except in parts of Indonesia where these banks do not have branch offices. Except for
operating bank accounts in other jurisdictions, the Group currently has no significant concentrations of credit risk.
(b) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s
approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its
liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking
damage to the Group’s reputation.
The Group manages its liquidity risk by monitoring its cash reserves and forecast spending. Management is cognisant
of the future demands for liquid finance resources to finance the Group’s current and future operations, and
consideration is given to the liquid assets available to the Group before commitment is made to future expenditure
or investment.
(c) Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity
prices will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market
risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising
any return.
Foreign exchange risk
The Group and the parent entity operated in Fiji and Cambodia and are exposed to foreign exchange risks arising
from the fluctuations between the exchange rates of the Australian, United States and Fijian Dollar. The Group has
no further material foreign currency dealings other than the above.
Foreign exchange risk arises when future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities denominated
in a currency that is not the Group’s functional currency. The Group has not formalised a foreign currency risk
management policy however, it monitors its foreign currency expenditure in light of exchange rate movements.
Interest rate risk
As the Group has significant interest bearing assets, the Group’s income and operating cash flows are materially
exposed to changes in market interest rates. The assets are short term interest bearing deposits, and no financial
instruments are employed to mitigate risk (Note 28 – Financial Instruments).
44
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
2 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
(d) Capital management
The Board’s policy is to maintain a sound capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and
to sustain future development of the business. The Board of Directors monitors capital expenditure and cash flows
as mentioned in (b).
The Group’s objectives when managing capital is to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, so
as to maintain a strong capital base sufficient to maintain future exploration and development of its projects. In order
to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell
assets to reduce debt. The Group’s focus has been to raise sufficient funds through equity to fund exploration and
evaluation activities.
There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year. Risk management policies
and procedures are established with regular monitoring and reporting.
Neither the Company nor any of its controlled entities are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
3 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including
expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the Group and that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances.
The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by
definition, seldom equal the related actual results.
Key judgments
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
The Company’s accounting policy is stated at Note 1(k). There is some subjectivity involved in the carrying forward
as capitalised or writing off to the income statement exploration and evaluation expenditure, however the Board and
management give due consideration to areas of interest on a regular basis and are confident that decisions to either
write off or carry forward such expenditure reflect fairly the prevailing situation. In the year ended 31 December 2015 an
amount of $Nil has been written off (2014: $Nil).
Key Estimates
Share based payments
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the
date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by an internal valuation using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model. Refer Note 24 for details of estimates and assumptions used.
45
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
4 PARENT COMPANY INFORMATION
The following information has been extracted from the books and records of the parent and has been prepared in
accordance with Accounting Standards.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
ASSETS
Current assets
Non current assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY
Issued capital
Share based payments reserve
Accumulated losses
TOTAL EQUITY
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total loss
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Guarantees
2015
$
2014
$
11,444,245
4,065,195
36,271,249
20,362,973
47,715,494
24,428,168
292,895
292,895
267,366
267,366
60,166,622
34,686,214
429,547
602,468
(13,173,571)
(11,127,880)
47,422,598
24,160,802
(2,315,067)
(2,315,067)
(7,872)
(7,872)
Geopacific Resources Limited has not entered into any guarantees, in the current or previous financial year, in relation
to the debts of its subsidiaries.
Contingent liabilities
At 31 December 2015, Geopacific Resources Limited had no contingent liabilities. (2014: Nil)
Contractual commitments
At 31 December 2015, Geopacific Resources Limited had not entered into any contractual commitments for the acquisition
of property, plant and equipment. (2014: Nil)
46
2015 ANNUAL REPORT5 REVENUE
Rental income
Interest income – financial institutions
Other income
6 LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
17,041
19,907
13,554
50,502
52,750
15,650
1,453
69,853
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
Loss before income tax includes the following specific expenses:
Contributions to defined superannuation funds
23,655
17,564
7 REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
Amounts received or receivable by Somes Cooke
28,500
30,000
47
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
8
INCOME TAX
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
(a) Reconciliation of income tax to prima facie tax payable
Loss before income tax
(2,000,637)
(1,636,029)
Tax at the Australian rate of 30% (2014 – 30%)
(600,191)
(490,809)
Tax effect of:
Non-deductible share based payment
Exploration costs during the year
Exploration assets from business combination
Capital raising costs
Other non-deductible expenses
Deferred tax assets not brought to account
Income tax expense
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Capitalised Exploration and Evaluation expenditure
Less: Deferred Tax Assets
Accrued expenses
Employee entitlements
Deductible equity raising costs
Losses available to offset against future income
Net Deferred tax assets not recognised
89,597
43,232
(4,770,625)
(1,658,851)
-
(85,125)
49,863
-
(55,617)
30,447
5,316,481
2,131,598
-
-
(7,847,212)
(5,685,568)
(7,847,212)
(5,685,568)
-
(4,464)
203,262
6,920,300
7,119,098
(728,114)
(19,091)
(19,090)
156,434
4,290,714
4,408,967
(1,276,601)
The deferred tax assets associated with tax losses not brought to account will only be obtained if:
(i) the company and the consolidated entity derive further assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to
enable the benefit from the deductions to be realised;
(ii) the company and the consolidated entity continue to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the law;
and
(iv) no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the company’s and the consolidated entity’s ability in realising the
benefit from the deductions.
48
2015 ANNUAL REPORT9 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Current
Cash at bank
10 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
Current
Security deposits
Sundry debtors
Other receivable
GST receivable
11 EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
12,589,002
4,165,516
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
123,862
3,891
238,742
388,293
754,788
120,433
19,840
122,872
27,337
290,482
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
(a) Non-Current
Capitalised exploration expenditure carried forward
26,157,372
18,951,894
Movement during year
Carrying value – beginning of year
Additions
Carrying value – end of year
18,951,895
13,422,389
7,205,477
5,529,505
26,157,372
18,951,894
During the year the Company did not expense any previously capitalized exploration expenditure (2013: nil).
(b) Non-Current Prepayment
8,581,940
-
In January 2015, the Company’subsidiary Royal Australia Resources Ltd entered into an agreement to acquire 100%
of the Issued Capital of Golden Resource Development Co Ltd for principle payments of $US14.0 million plus interest
payment of US$1,275,750. Under the terms of the agreement payments of principle and interest will be made over time
until 31 July 2016. The First payment of US$1.4 million was made on 31 January 2015. The second principle payment of
US$3,150,000 was due and was paid on 31 July 2015.
49
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
12 JOINT ARRANGEMENTS
Interest in Joint Operations
RakiRaki (Fiji) Joint Venture
Geopacific Resources Limited has a 50% interest in Joint Venture
with Peninsula Energy Limited.
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
13 PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Non-Current
Plant, vehicles and equipment
At Cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Total plant and equipment
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
567,331
561,705
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
397,172
(246,326)
150,846
509,344
(299,662)
209,682
Movement - 2015
Plant &
Equipment
$
Computer
software
$
Motor
Vehicle
$
Lease
Vehicle
$
Furniture
& Fittings
$
Total
$
Balance at 1 January 2015
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation
141,929
8,193
(46,496)
27,414
9,991
-
-
8,515
31,824
209,682
30,619
(2,569)
-
-
-
58,803
(3,849)
(52,913)
(50,428)
(20,120)
(20,810)
(8,515)
(5,789)
(105,662)
Foreign exchange difference
Balance at 31 December 2015
31,877
95,075
2,078
19,363
11,365
18,606
-
-
(4,384)
17,802
40,936
150,846
50
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
13 PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)
Movement - 2014
Plant &
Equipment
$
Computer
software
$
Motor
Vehicle
$
Lease
Vehicle
$
Furniture
& Fittings
$
Total
$
Balance at 1 January 2014
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation
149,425
38,512
-
37,224
5,558
-
2,002
18,721
37,398
244,770
-
-
-
-
-
-
44,070
-
(46,008)
(15,368)
(2,002)
(10,206)
(5,574)
(79,158)
Balance at 31 December 2014
141,929
27,414
-
8,515
31,824
209,682
At 31 December 2014, a motor vehicle with a carrying amount of $ 8,515 (2013: $18,721) is secured under a finance lease
arrangement.
14 TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
Current
Sundry creditors and accruals
15 PROVISIONS
Current
Provisions
16 FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
CURRENT
Lease liabilities
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
1,072,935
762,230
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
14,881
63,635
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
2,453
13,391
51
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
17 ISSUED CAPITAL
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
Issued Capital
60,099,072
34,686,214
Reconciliation of movements during the period:
2015
No. of
Shares
$
No. of
Shares
2014
$
Balance as at 1 January
334,410,848
34,686,214
193,670,521
27,302,822
Shares issued pursuant to Rights Issue
52,631,579
3,000,000
Shares issued pursuant to a placement at 6 cents
150,000,000
9,000,000
Shares issued pursuant to Rights Issue - Institutional
component
137,665,015
7,571,576
118,069,475
6,493,821
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,120,000
56,000
95,989,889
5,279,443
12,130,438
697,500
31,500,000
1,811,250
416,667
6,400,000
-
-
-
-
-
25,000
-
-
-
-
-
(677,539)
(460,801)
799,593,584
60,099,072
334,410,848
34,686,214
Shares issued pursuant to Rights issue - retail
component
Shares issued to consultants in lieu of cash
Shares issued at conversion of Performance Rights
Shares issued on conversion of Convertible Notes
Shares issued pursuant to a placement at 5.5 cents
Shares issued pursuant to a placement at 5.75 cents
Shares issued pursuant to a placement at 5.75 cents
Less share issue costs
Balance as at 31 December
52
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
441,822
643,465
1,085,287
(200,947)
602,469
401,522
602,469
310,372
(269,376)
643,465
(200,947)
642,769
441,822
1,085,287
389,811
277,738
(65,080)
602,469
(348,273)
147,326
(200,947)
401,522
18 RESERVES
(a) Reserves
Foreign currency translation reserve
Share based payments reserve
(b) Movements
Share based payments reserve
Balance 1 January
Rights/Option expense
Options expired
Balance 31 December
Foreign currency translation reserve
Balance 1 January
Exchange gains during year
Balance 31 December
Total reserves
(c) Nature and purpose of reserves
Share based payments reserve
The share-based payments reserve records the value of unexercised options issued to employees and Directors
which have been taken to expenses, the value of options issued on acquisition of Millennium Mining (Fiji) Ltd, the
value of unexercised options granted pursuant to the Employee Share Option, and the value of Performance Rights
which have vested.
Foreign currency translation reserve
The foreign currency translation reserve records unrealised exchange gains and losses on translation of controlled
entities accounts during the year.
19 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Group does not have any contingent liabilities at the end of the reporting period.
53
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
20 COMMITMENTS
(a) Tenement Commitments
Entities in the Group are required to spend certain amounts to retain their interest in areas over which Special
Prospecting Licenses are held. All requirements have been complied with and all reports and lodgements have been
made. The Group is currently waiting on the reissue of certain licences by the Mineral and Resource Department of Fiji.
The following expenditure for 2015 is required.
Tenement
Tenement
Renewed to
Annual
Expenditure $FJD
SPL1216
21 January 2017
SPL 1231/1373
29 November 2018
200,000
75,000
SPL 1436
29 November 2018
50,000
SPL 1361
9 December 2016
300,000
SPL 1368
9 December 2016
500,000
SPL 1415
6 November 2016
75,000
Comments
Annual expenditure is budgeted amount lodged.
50% to be met by JV partner Imperial Mining (Fiji)
Ltd. Annual expenditure is budgeted amount lodged.
50% to be met by JV partner Imperial Mining (Fiji)
Ltd. Annual expenditure is budgeted amount.
Licence renewed for 3 years, final year expenditure
of FJD$500,000
Licence renewed for 3 years, final year expenditure
of FJD$800,000
Licence renewed for 3 years, final year expenditure
of FJD$150,000
SPL 1493
29 November 2018
50,000
Annual expenditure is budgeted amount.
(b) Finance lease commitments
Payable – minimum lease payments:
Payable not later than one year
Payable later than one year, but not later than five years
Minimum lease payments
Less future finance charge
Present value of minimum lease payments
(c) Operating lease commitments
Payable not later than one year
Payable later than one year, but not later than five years
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
2,453
-
2,453
(106)
2,347
13,742
-
13,742
(351)
13,391
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
130,311
238,904
369,215
140,035
256,731
396,766
Geopacific’s wholly owned subsidiary Worldwide has a lease over office premises at Level 1 278 Stirling Highway
Claremont which expires on 31 October 2017.
54
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
21 PARTICULARS RELATING TO CONTROLLED ENTITIES
Worldwide Mining Projects Pty Ltd
Eastkal Pte Ltd
PT IAR Indonesia Ltd
Beta Limited
Royal Australia Resources Ltd
Geopacific Limited
Millennium Mining (Fiji) Limited
Class of Share
Holding Company
2015
2014
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
%
100
100
100
100
85
100
100
%
100
100
100
100
85
100
100
Worldwide Mining Projects Pty Ltd is a company incorporated and carrying on business in Australia.
Eastkal Pte Ltd is a company incorporated and carrying on business in Singapore.
PT IAR Indonesia is a company incorporated and carrying on business in Indonesia.
Royal Australia Resources Ltd is a company incorporated and carrying on business in Cambodia. Petrochemicals
(Cambodia) Refinery Ltd holds a 15% minority interest in Royal Australia Resources Ltd.
Worldwide Mining Projects Pty Ltd and Petrochemicals (Cambodia) Refinery Ltd entered into a shareholders agreement
in December 2012 to explore, develop and hold the Kou Sa project.
Petrochemicals (Cambodia) Refinery Ltd will be a free carried joint venture partner until a decision to mine on the area
which is subject to the Kou Sa project is made, following which Petrochemicals (Cambodia) Refinery Ltd will:
a) Be granted an option to purchase further shares in Royal Australia Resources Ltd at fair market value to increase its
percentage shareholding to 20%; and
b) Contribute to all costs, expenses and liabilities incurred or sustained in proportion to its shareholding interest in
Royal Australia Resources Ltd.
Geopacific Limited, Beta Limited and Millennium Mining (Fiji) Limited are companies incorporated and carrying on
business in Fiji.
55
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
22 KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES
(a) Directors
The names of each person holding the position of Director of Geopacific Resources Ltd during the financial year were:
M Jerkovic
R S Heeks
M T Bojanjac
R J Fountain (retired 18 August 2015)
(b) Other key management personnel
All Directors are identified as key management personnel under AASB 124 “Related Party Disclosures”.
The Company Secretary, JC Lewis and Exploration Manager, S Whitehead, also meet the definition of key management
personnel.
(c) Key management personnel compensation
Short term employee benefits
Post employment benefits
Share based payments
Total Key Management Personnel compensation
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
767,296
22,255
243,950
1,033,501
829,848
21,962
121,975
973,785
Refer to the remuneration report contained in the Directors’ Report for details of the remuneration paid or payable
to each member of the Group’s key management personnel for the year ended 31 December 2015.
23 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
All transactions with related parties are on normal commercial terms and conditions.
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
Transactions with directors and associates of directors
Xavier Group Pty Ltd, a Company in which Mr Jerkovic is a
Director and shareholder, is utilised to provide services in
relation to Geopacific Resources Limited:
Consulting Services
493,103
68,423
56
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
24 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
(a) Employee Option Plan
Geopacific Resources Limited Employee Option Plan was approved by shareholders at the annual general meeting
held on 31 May 2012. All employees are eligible to participate in the plan.
Plan options are granted under the plan for no consideration. Options granted under the plan carry no dividend or
voting rights. When exercisable, each option is convertible into one ordinary share. No options have been granted
under the plan.
(b) Services
During the year the Company issued 416,667 shares as payment for services.
(c) Unlisted options issued
During the financial year no options over unissued shares were granted or exercised (2014 Nil). During the year the
following options were cancelled or lapsed unexpired (2014: 750,000).
Number of Options Issued
Date of Issue
Exercise Price
2,000,000
5 April 2012
$0.30
Expiry Date
5 April 2015
Schedule of Issued Unlisted Option Movements During the 2015 Year
Issue
Date
Expiry Date
Exercise
Price
05.04.2012
05.04.2015
06.06.2009
06.06.2009
(a)
(b)
$0.30
$2.50
$5.00
Number
on issue
1 January
2015
2,000,000
800,000
200,000
05.08.2014
05.08.2017
$0.07452
1,688,768
4,688,768
Granted
during
year
Lapsed
during
year
Number
on issue
31 December 2015
-
-
-
-
-
(2,000,000)
-
-
-
(2,000,000)
800,000
200,000
1,688,768
2,688,768
(a) The Options are exercisable in whole or in part, not later than five years after the defining on Faddy’s Gold
Deposit of a JORC compliant ore reserve of over 200,000 ounces of contained gold.
(b) The Options are exercisable in whole or in part, not later than ten years after the defining on Faddy’s Gold Deposit
of a JORC compliant ore reserve of over 1,000,000 ounces of contained gold.
57
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
24 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
(c) Unlisted options issued (continued)
Schedule of Issued Unlisted Option Movements During the 2014 Year
Issue
Date
Expiry Date
Exercise
Price
30.09.2011
30.09.2014
05.04.2012
30.09.2014
05.04.2012
05.04.2015
06.06.2009
06.06.2009
(a)
(b)
$0.30
$0.30
$0.30
$2.50
$5.00
Number
on issue
1 January
2014
500,000
250,000
2,000,000
800,000
200,000
Granted
during
year
Lapsed
during
year
Number
on issue
31 December 2014
-
-
-
-
-
(500,000)
(250,000)
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,000,000
800,000
200,000
1,688,768
4,688,768
05.08.2014
05.08.2017
$0.07452
-
1,688,768
3,750,000
1,688,768
(750,000)
(d) Performance rights issued
During the financial year, 6,400,000 performance rights issued in the prior year vested on completion of the vesting
conditions. At the year end date, 6,150,000 performance rights had not yet vested.
The conditions that must be met in order for the Performance Rights to vest are as follows:
•
50% will vest upon the performance by the eligible employee of 12 months continuous service from 1 July 2014;
and
•
50% will vest upon the performance by the eligible employee of 24 months continuous service from 1 July 2014.
Schedule of Performance Rights Movements During the 2015 Year
Issue
Date
Exercise
Price
Number
on issue
1 January
2015
Granted
during
year
Lapsed/
exercised
during
year
Number
on issue
31 December 2015
1 July 2014
Nil
12,550,000
-
(6,400,000)
6,150,000
Schedule of Performance Rights Movements During the 2014 Year
Issue
Date
Exercise
Price
Number
on issue
1 January
2014
Granted
during
year
Lapsed/
exercised
during
year
Number
on issue
31 December 2014
1 July 2014
Nil
-
12,550,000
-
12,550,000
58
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
25 LOSS PER SHARE
(a) Basic and diluted loss per share
CONSOLIDATED
2015
Cents
2014
Cents
Basic loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company
Diluted loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company
(0.25)
(0.25)
(0.67)
(0.67)
(b) Reconciliation of loss used in calculating loss per share
2015
$
2014
$
Basic and diluted loss per share
Loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company used
in calculating basic and diluted loss per share
(2,000,637)
(1,636,029)
(c) Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the
denominator in calculating basic and diluted loss per share.
2015
Number
2014
Number
792,776,917
242,855,979
All options on issue are considered anti-dilutive and thus have not been included in the calculation of diluted loss per
share. These options could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future.
26 EVENTS OCCURRING AFTER THE YEAR END
Other than the following, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of this
report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the Directors of the Company
to affect substantially the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in
subsequent financial years.
On 8 February 2015 the Company announced it had successfully renegotiated the payment terms of the acquisition
agreement with the Vendor of the Kou Sa copper gold project in Cambodia. The terms defer the final payment of US$6.4M,
linking future payments to the achievement of two project development milestones being a payment of US$1.575 Million
at Bankable Feasibility Study and 2% royalty capped at US$8.425 Million at Production. No further vendor payments are
due on the Kou Sa Project until the project development milestones are reached, as the Company has made the January
milestone payment of US$3.15 Million.
59
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
27 OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed by the Board in assessing
performance and determining the appropriate allocation of the Group’s resources. The Group also has had regard to the
qualitative thresholds for the determination of operating segments.
For management purposes the Group is organised into two operating segments based on geographical locations, which
involves mineral exploration and development in Cambodia and Fiji. All other corporate expenses are disclosed as
“Others” within this segment report. The Group’s principal activities are interrelated and the Group has no revenue from
operations.
All significant operating decisions are based on analysis of the Group as two segments. The financial results of these
segments are equivalent to the financial statements of the Company as a whole.
The accounting policies applied for internal reporting purposes are consistent with those applied in preparation of the
financial statements.
Revenue by geographical region
The Group has not generated revenue from operations, other than other revenue as below.
Cambodia
Fiji
Others
Total Other Revenue
The Group’s segment net loss before tax is as follows:
Cambodia
Fiji
Others
Total net loss before tax
2015
$
2014
$
38,754
107
11,641
50,502
-
-
69,853
69,853
2015
$
2014
$
(84,910)
(116,989)
(87,902)
(119,144)
(1,798,738)
(1,428,983)
(2,000,637)
(1,636,029)
60
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
27 OPERATING SEGMENTS (CONTINUED)
Assets by geographical region
The location of segment assets is disclosed below by geographical location of the assets.
Cambodia
Fiji
Others
Total Assets
2015
$
2014
$
27,908,164
11,487,404
7,714,890
12,610,894
7,621,593
4,508,576
48,233,948
23,617,573
The location of segment liabilities is disclosed below by geographical location of the liabilities.
Cambodia
Fiji
Others
Total Liabilities
2015
$
2014
$
770,364
990
318,915
1,090,269
462,719
14,283
362,254
839,256
61
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
28 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURES
Credit risk
The Directors do not consider that the Group’s financial assets are subject to anything more than a negligible level of
credit risk, and as such no disclosures are made. Refer to Note 2(a).
Impairment losses
The Directors do not consider that any of the Group’s financial assets are subject to impairment at the reporting date. No
impairment expense or reversal of impairment charge has occurred during the reporting period.
Liquidity risk
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding
the impact of netting agreements. Refer to Note 2(b):
Carrying
amount
$
Contractual
cash flows
$
6 months
or less
$
6-12 months
$
1-2
years
$
Consolidated
2015
Financial assets – cash
flows realisable
Cash and cash
equivalents
Trade and other
receivables
12,589,002
12,589,002
12,589,002
754,788
754,788
754,788
Total anticipated inflows
13,343,790
13,343,790
13,343,790
Carrying
amount
$
Contractual
cash flows
$
6 months
or less
$
6-12 months
$
Trade and other payables
1,072,935
1,072,935
1,072,935
Other financial liabilities
2,453
2,453
2,453
Total expected outflows
1,075,388
1,075,388
1,075,388
Net inflow/(outflow) on
financial instruments
12,268,402
12,268,402
12,268,402
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1-2
years
$
62
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
28 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
Carrying
amount
$
Contractual
cash flows
$
6 months
or less
$
6-12 months
$
1-2
years
$
2014
Financial assets – cash
flows realisable
Cash and cash
equivalents
Trade and other
receivables
4,165,516
4,165,516
4,165,516
290,482
290,482
290,482
Total anticipated inflows
4,455,998
4,455,998
4,455,998
Financial liabilities due
for payment
Trade and other payables
Other financial liabilities
Total expected outflows
Net inflow/(outflow) on
financial instruments
762,230
13,391
775,621
762,230
13,391
775,621
762,230
13,391
775,621
3,680,377
3,680,377
3,680,377
The weighted average interest rate for the interest bearing liabilities is 12% (2014:12%).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
63
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
28 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
Currency risk
The Group is exposed to foreign currency on expenditures that are dominated in a currency other than Australian Dollars.
The currency’s giving rise to this risk is primarily United States and Fiji Dollars.
Interest rate risk
At the reporting date the interest profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments were:
Fixed rate instruments:
Financial liabilities
Variable rate instruments:
Financial assets
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
2,453
2,453
13,391
13,391
12,589,002
12,589,002
4,165,516
4,165,516
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/ (decreased) equity and profit or
loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables remain constant.
Profit and Loss
Equity
100bp
increase
$
100bp
decrease
$
100bp
increase
$
100bp
decrease
$
2015
Variable rate instruments
125,890
(125,890)
125,890
(125,890)
2014
Variable rate instruments
Fair values
Fair values versus carrying amounts
41,655
(41,655)
41,655
(41,655)
The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities as described in the consolidated statement of financial position
represent their estimated net fair value.
64
2015 ANNUAL REPORTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
29 NOTES TO THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(a) For the purpose of the Statement of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents includes cash at bank.
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year as shown in the Statement of Cash Flows is reconciled to
the related items in the Statement of Financial Position as follows:
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
Cash at Bank
12,589,002
4,165,516
(b) Non Cash Financing
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
Share based payments (Note 24.d)
310,372
145,107
(c) Reconciliation of Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Loss for the year
Non-cash items:
Depreciation
Share based payments
Options expense
Interest on financial liability
Changes in Assets and Liabilities, net of the effects of
purchase of subsidiaries:
Decrease/(Increase) in trade and other receivables
Increase/(Decrease) in trade and other payables
Increase in provisions
CONSOLIDATED
2015
$
2014
$
(2,000,637)
(1,636,029)
105,663
310,372
-
-
(300,416)
273,002
(48,754)
79,158
145,107
67,551
1,209
76,586
319,974
26,835
Net Cash used in Operating Activities
(1,660,770)
(919,609)
65
2015 ANNUAL REPORTASX INFORMATION
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 31 March 2016.
A. Distribution of equity securities – ordinary shares
Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding:
1 – 1000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
100,001 and over
Total
Class of equity security
Ordinary shares
Number
Shares
22
21
35
291
239
608
4,981
64,233
316,127
12,093,736
787,114,507
799,593,584
There were 78 holders of less than a marketable parcel of 10,000 ordinary shares.
B. Equity security holders – ordinary shares
The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted equity securities - ordinary shares are listed below:
Ordinary shares
Number held
Percentage of
issued shares
354,912,172
197,760,104
27,751,427
16,622,124
8,843,053
7,135,753
7,053,381
6,606,414
6,352,942
5,541,176
4,669,123
4,089,918
3,700,000
3,525,000
3,476,364
2,739,131
2,666,667
2,666,667
2,572,888
2,500,000
2,500,000
44.387
24.733
3.471
2.079
1.106
0.892
0.882
0.826
0.795
0.693
0.584
0.511
0.463
0.441
0.435
0.343
0.334
0.334
0.322
0.313
0.313
673,684,304
125,909,280
799,593,584
84.25%
15.75%
100.00%
MERRILL LYNCH (AUSTRALIA) NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
NDOVU CAPITAL IV B.V.
HOME IDEAS SHOW PTY LTD
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above