Quarterlytics / Headlam Group

Headlam Group

head · LSE
Claim this profile
Ticker head
Exchange LSE
Sector
Industry
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2005 Annual Report · Headlam Group
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Europe’s leading
floorcovering
distributor

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Headlam has a clear and focused strategy based on the creation 
of a diverse and autonomous structure. The group operates
through 46 separate businesses in the UK and a further three 
in Continental Europe.

A key factor contributing to the group’s success is the
individuality of experienced management teams who are
responsible for the market presence, development and 
ultimate profitability of their businesses.

Each business is supported by the commitment to continued
investment in people, product, facilities and IT. This commitment
has provided the basis for the group’s growth and subsequent
performance enabling it to develop into Europe’s leading
floorcovering distributor.

02 Market Presence
10
14
20
24
25
26
28
31
38
45

Chairman’s Statement
Chief Executive’s Review
Financial Review
Directors, Officers and Advisers
Financial Calendar
Directors’ Report
Corporate and Social Responsibility
Corporate Governance
Remuneration Report
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

46

47
48

Independent Auditors’ Report to the 
Members of Headlam Group plc
Consolidated Income Statement 
Statement of Recognised Income and 
Expense
Balance Sheets
Cash Flow Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements

49
51
52
109 Principal Trading Subsidiaries
110 Financial Record
111 Notice of Annual General Meeting

Financial Highlights

Financial Highlights

Sales (£m)

Operating 
Profit (£m)

Earnings 
Per Share (p)

Proposed
Dividends (p)

* not restated for IFRS

487

465

434

412

396

01
*

02
*

03
*

04

05

41.5

38.9

32.1

30.4

33.5

01
*

02
*

03
*

04

05

33.1

31.3

27.3

23.3

24.4

01
*

02
*

03
*

04

05

18.0

16.25

13.85

12.55

11.40

01
*

02
*

03
*

04

05

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

01

+4.7%

+2.6m

+5.8%

+10.8%

02

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Market Presence

The UK operating structure incorporates 46 individual
businesses located across 21 distribution centres. 
Of these, 25 are multi-product distribution businesses
that trade on a regional basis. Six of the businesses
provide national multi-product distribution whilst
the remaining 15 are suppliers of specific types of
floorcovering that target particular sectors within
the residential and commercial markets.

Our business in France operates from two distribution
centres and 20 service centres and the businesses in
Switzerland and the Netherlands each operate from
a single distribution centre. All three businesses on
the Continent offer an extensive range of floorcovering
products providing full national coverage across
their respective countries.

Market Presence

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

03

Regional Multi-product Distribution HFD

04

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Market Presence (continued)

Regional Multi-product Distribution MCD

MCD

MCD

Market Presence

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

05

National Multi-product Distribution Network

06

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Market Presence (continued)

National Residential and Commercial Specialist Products

National
Carpets

Market Presence

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

07

European Multi-product Distribution

Lethem-Vergeer - The Netherlands

La Maison du Sol - France

Belcolor Flooring - Switzerland 

LMS Warehouses

LMS Regional Service Centres

08

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

We are able to offer

the independent floor

covering retailer and

contractor a huge

breadth of product

including the latest

trends and

innovations.

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

09

Our businesses have clearly focused market objectives across a broad range of

floorcovering products and are supported by comprehensive stockholdings.

10

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Chairman’s Statement

The group has had another successful year despite more difficult
market conditions in 2005. The group's revenue and profit for the
year were another record, with improvements being achieved
across all sections of the business.

Revenues from the group’s activities amounted to £486.6 million,
an increase of 4.7% on last year, and profit before tax increased
by 6.0% to £40.8 million.

Earnings and dividend
Basic earnings per share increased by 5.8% from 31.3p to 33.1p.
The board is recommending a final dividend of 13.60p per share,
an increase of 11.0% on last year. This increases the total
dividend for the year by 10.8% from 16.25p to 18.00p. If
approved, the final dividend will be paid on 3 July 2006 to
shareholders on the register at 9 June 2006.

Operations
We have continued with our strategy of businesses operating
autonomously to maximise market presence. We now have 46
businesses operating from 21 distribution centres in the UK and
whilst enjoying this individuality, all the businesses operate to 
a defined strategy and comply with consistent reporting
procedures. 

These businesses have clearly focused market objectives across 
a broad range of floorcovering products and are supported by
comprehensive stockholdings. This ensures that we have strong
long-term relationships with the leading floorcovering
manufacturers and most importantly, offer the independent
floorcovering retailer and contractor a huge breadth of product,
including the latest trends and innovations.

During the year, we completed the construction of the
distribution facility in Tamworth at a cost of £5.2 million
bringing the total amount invested on this facility to £13.9
million. Construction also commenced on the new purpose built
freehold facility for our Wilkies business based in Leeds. During
2005, we invested £2.0 million and a further £9.4 million will be
expended before the site becomes operational during the autumn
of 2006.

to retire from the board which I shall do at the conclusion of the
forthcoming AGM.

Graham Waldron, who has a wealth of experience in the
floorcovering industry, will continue to guide the strategy of the
group in an executive capacity and following my retirement, be
appointed Chairman.

I am pleased to have welcomed in recent months Dick Peters 
and Mike O'Leary to the board as non-executive directors, both 
of whom I expect will make positive contributions to the future
growth and development of the group. 

It is with much sadness that I record the death of Roger Dickens
in January 2006 and we send our sincere sympathy to Lainey
Dickens and family. Roger was a highly respected member of our
board and we have lost a valued colleague and friend. We shall
miss him.

Employees
The group has great strength in its management teams across the
whole business. It has been a particular pleasure to see how this
has developed over the twelve years I have been a director. The
group's performance reflects the commitment, dedication and
efforts of our employees in providing the services given to our
customers. The board wishes to record its thanks to all our
employees for their hard work and continued customer service.

Outlook
The group’s structure and strategy of autonomous sales and
marketing activities with common operational and financial
disciplines is firmly established. This allows the individual
businesses to optimise their relationship with suppliers and
customers. 

With the benefit of these activities, our businesses in the UK 
and Continental Europe have made a positive start to 2006 and
we believe the group is well positioned to achieve its objectives
for the year.

The Board
I have now completed twelve years as a non-executive director of
Headlam, the past six as Chairman and the time has come for me

Trevor Larman, Chairman

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

11

Our businesses in the UK and
Continental Europe have made 
a positive start to 2006 and 
we believe the group is well
positioned to achieve its
objectives for the year.

Trevor Larman, Chairman

12

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

We continue to invest in the latest order processing technology to help

service our customers requirements.

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

13

We are committed to

offering our customers

a comprehensive

product range with

stock levels to service

their demand.

14

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Chief Executive’s Review

We are very pleased with the performance of the group in 2005.
The UK businesses produced a particularly positive result
following the significant growth in 2004. These businesses were
able collectively to increase sales by 2.4% on a like for like basis,
in more difficult market conditions and therefore established a
further increase in our market share. 

The businesses are defined into four specific sectors.

Regional multi-product: we have 25 businesses that operate
regionally from their distribution facility, supplying floorcovering
across all of our product categories. These businesses increased
their sales by 1.9% and contribute 68% of UK turnover.

The Continental European businesses in France, Switzerland and
the Netherlands continue to improve their sales and profitability.

National multi-product: Mercado through its six business
identities and extensive product range was again able to improve
its market position.

UK operations
The success of the UK businesses is established through the
autonomous sales and marketing activities of 46 businesses
operating from 21 distribution facilities. The experienced
managers of these businesses continually work with the world’s
leading floorcovering manufacturers to develop and launch new
products. 

We have 297 employed external sales people who position these
new products with independent flooring retailers and contractors,
ensuring that our customers are at the forefront of all product
innovation. These sales people subsequently maximise the market
presence of their individual businesses and the group as a whole.

It is fundamental to the group strategy and culture that whilst
encouraging this sales and marketing autonomy, each of the
businesses operate from an identical IT platform and comply with
standard operational and financial disciplines.

Residential specialist: we enjoyed significant growth within
the 12 businesses specialising in middle to high price carpet
products, increasing their sales by 41% and now contributing
11% of UK turnover.

Commercial specialist: our three businesses increased sales 
by 2.8% and are now able to take full advantage of increased
capacity following their relocation to the new facility in
Tamworth.

Customers
Our customers, principally independent floorcovering retailers 
and contractors, continued to prosper. The group’s ongoing
growth reflects the market presence of our active accounts 
which total 35,748.

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

15

The experienced managers 
of our businesses continually 
work with the world’s leading
floorcovering manufacturers
to develop and launch new
products. 

Tony Brewer, Group Chief Executive

Business Sectors

Proportion by Product

Regional Multi-product (68%)

National Multi-product (16%)

Residential Specialist (11%)

Commercial Specialist (5%)

Carpet (50%)

Vinyl (13%)

Laminate & Wood (5%)

Accessories (6%)

Contract (26%)

16

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Chief Executive’s Review (continued)

Products
Total carpet sales, which represent 50% of UK turnover, increased
by 4%. This increase was aided by the launch of 2,486 new
ranges, established in our customers through 626,482 point of
sale items. Residential vinyl increased by 6%, supported by 693
new products marketed through 167,360 displays and samples.
Wood and laminate products saw a small decline in sales,
however this performance improved during the latter part 
of 2005. 

All residential product categories including wood and laminate
have seen an improving sales trend during the first three months
of 2006. 

As planned, our stock increased during the year with the
enlarged capacity at Tamworth and Coleshill, in addition to 
the extension to our facilities at Thatcham and Stockport. 
This further demonstrates our commitment to our customers to
offer a comprehensive product range with stock levels to service
their demand.

Construction is now underway for the 105,000 square feet
purpose built freehold distribution facility for Wilkies, our
regional multi-product business based in Leeds. This will be
completed in the autumn of this year, enabling Wilkies to
develop further its residential and commercial business in the
north of England. 

Sales in the contract sector which represent 26% of UK turnover,
showed strong growth of 8%. During the second half of 2005 and
the first quarter of 2006, we have invested in additional sales
people in order to enhance our market position and subsequently
accelerate our sales growth in the contract sector.

The strong cash generation by our operations allows continued
investment to strengthen further the group’s position. We have
other projects at various stages of the planning and development
process, to ensure that the group remains the leader in European
floorcovering distribution.

Investments
The new purpose built freehold distribution facility in Tamworth
became fully operational during the year and also allowed us to
move four businesses from Coleshill, therefore releasing capacity
in the Coleshill distribution facility. 

Europe
It is very encouraging to see our Continental European
businesses in France, Switzerland and the Netherlands 
continue to improve their performance. This has been achieved
consistently over the last four years. Market conditions and

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

17

Outlook
The first 12 weeks of 2006 have shown a positive sales trend
throughout our businesses in both the UK and Continental
Europe.

Each of our businesses are clearly focused on maximising their
individual market presence and with the contribution from all 
of these initiatives, we look forward to achieving another
successful year.

Tony Brewer, Group Chief Executive

business development opportunities give every confidence 
that these businesses can continue to grow their sales and
profitability over the coming years.

Acquisitions
During 2005 we acquired the businesses of Clarendon Carpets 
and Gaskell Wool Rich. We are currently investing in the sales 
and marketing of new products for both of these businesses
along with the Gaskell Wool Rich brand of Mr Tomkinson Carpets
and expect to enhance their performance during 2006. 

We continue to evaluate other acquisition opportunities, both 
in the UK and Continental Europe and with a cautious approach,
we would expect to further enlarge the number of business
activities.

Information Technology
LMS, our French business with two warehouses and 20 regional
facilities, was successfully converted onto our common IT
platform in January 2006. This completes the process that all of
our businesses in the UK and Continental Europe now operate on
the same IT system. This reflects the group policy of allowing
sales and marketing autonomy with identical operational and
financial controls.

18

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

During the year the

extensions to our

facilities at Thatcham

and Stockport and our

new distribution

facility in Tamworth

all became fully

operational.

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

19

Strong cash generation allows continued investment to ensure the group

remains the leader in European floorcovering distribution.

20

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Financial Review

International Financial Reporting Standards
Following a change in regulations, the group is reporting its
financial statements in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU. The group
formerly reported its results under UK Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (UK GAAP).

The results for 2005 comply with these new requirements and the
accounting policies adopted under IFRS have been used to restate
the comparative information for the year ended 31 December 2004.

Both the group and the company are preparing their financial
statements in accordance with IFRS for the first time and
consequently both have applied IFRS 1. An explanation of how
the transition to IFRS has affected the reported financial
performance, financial position and cash flows of the group is
provided in note 33.

In addition to exempting companies from the requirement to
restate comparatives for IAS 32 and IAS 39, IFRS 1 grants certain
exemptions from the full requirements of IFRS in the transition
period. The following exemptions have been taken in these
financial statements:

Business combinations – Business combinations that occurred
prior to 1 January 2004 have not been restated.

Properties - Both the group and the company have elected to
restate the carrying value of freehold and long leasehold
properties as at 1 January 2004 to historical cost. Previously,
properties were stated at a combination of historical cost and
market value.

Employee benefits – All cumulative actuarial gains and losses 
on defined benefit plans have been recognised in equity at 
1 January 2004.

Cumulative translation differences – Cumulative translation
differences for all foreign operations have been set to zero at 
1 January 2004. Any gains and losses arising in the income
statement on the subsequent disposal of an overseas subsidiary
undertaking will only include those exchange gains or losses
arising from the date of transition.

Share based payments – IFRS 2 - Share based payments, has
been applied only to grants of equity settled share based

payments made after 7 November 2002 that had not vested by 
1 January 2005.

Following initial adoption, the group has taken the option not
to comply with the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39.
Consequently, all movements in the fair value of the hedge are
recognised immediately in the income statement, within net
financing costs.

A summary of the differences arising from the change to IFRS
compared with the reporting basis used prior to the introduction
of IFRS are shown below for the consolidated income statement
and balance sheet.

Consolidated income statement
for year ended 31 December

2005
£000

2004
£000

Profit before goodwill amortisation 
and taxation – previous reporting basis
Intangibles amortisation
Retirement benefit obligation
Share based payments
Property leases
Additional depreciation on revalued properties

42,279
(836)
(463)
(196)
(3)
59

39,259
(836)
62
(57)
(3)
59

Profit before tax – IFRS

40,840

38,484

Balance sheet
at 31 December

Net assets – previous reporting basis
Intangibles amortisation
Goodwill
Retirement benefit obligation
Deferred taxation
Revaluation reserve
Property leases
Dividends
Cash flow hedging

2005
£000

2004
£000

(1,672)
1,050

140,910 126,868
(836)
918
(20,886) (17,853)
6,322
(6,975)
(42)
13,958
—

7,828
(6,916)
(46)
15,572
(13)

Net assets – IFRS

135,827 122,360

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

21

The group’s operating profit
increased by 6.7% from £38.9 to
£41.5 million with the UK and
Continental European businesses
achieving increases of 8.0% and
5.6% respectively.

Stephen Wilson, Group Finance Director

22

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Financial Review (continued)

Overall, the effects of the change on profit before tax have not
been significant. For 2005, profit before goodwill amortisation
and taxation, derived on the basis used for previous reporting,
reduced by £1,439,000 or 3.4%. The equivalent adjustment for
2004 was a reduction in profit before goodwill amortisation and
taxation of £775,000 or 2.0%.

As with the income statement, the overall effect on net assets
arising from the adoption of IFRS, has not been particularly
significant. Net assets derived from the previous reporting basis
reduced by £5,083,000 in 2005 and £4,508,000 in 2004.

Trading performance
Group revenues increased during the year by 4.7% from £464.8
million to £486.6 million. Like for like improvement from the UK
businesses amounted to 2.4% whilst the Continental European
businesses achieved a collective like for like increase of 3.6% or
3.0% at constant rates of exchange.

Further contributions to revenue for 2005 were made by National
Carpets and Kingsmead, the two businesses acquired during 2004
but registering their first full year results during 2005 and
Clarendon and Gaskell Wool Rich acquired during 2005.

The group’s operating profit increased by 6.7% from £38.9
million to £41.5 million with the UK and Continental European
businesses achieving increases before unallocated corporate
expenses of 8.0% and 5.6% respectively. At constant rates of
exchange, the increase for Continental Europe was 5.0%.

Financial income and expense
The components of financial income and expense are as follows:

Financial income
Bank interest
Other interest received
Return on defined pension plan assets

Financial expense
Bank loans, overdrafts 

and other financial expenses

Interest on defined benefit 
pension plan obligation

Finance leases

Net financing costs

2005
£000

1,329
87
2,477

2004
£000

886
141
2,273

3,893

3,300

(1,503)

(997)

(2,987)
(61)

(2,654)
(89)

(4,551)

(3,740)

(658)

(440)

Net financing costs excluding net expenses relating to the defined
benefit pension plans increased from £59,000 to £148,000 mainly
as a consequence of increased investment in inventory during
2005. Net finance expense relating to the pension plans was
higher during the year, rising from £381,000 to £510,000, because
of the net increase in the employee benefits liability.

Taxation
The effective rate of taxation reduced to 30.2% compared with
30.5% for the previous year. The rate reflects the group’s current
mix of business and it is anticipated that the effective tax rate
should remain at around these levels for the foreseeable future.

Employee benefits
During the year, the net deficit relating to the defined benefit
pension plans, as measured under IAS 19 – Employee benefits
increased by £2.1 million from £18.4 million to £20.5 million. 
The deficit relates to the following:

UK plan
French retirement indemnity premium

£000

(20,226)
(286)

(20,512)

The Year in Review

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

23

Whilst the UK plan asset base has benefited from the recent
revival in the value of equities, the plan liabilities have increased
at a faster rate because of the decline in bond yields.

During the year, the UK plan actuary completed the triennial
actuarial valuation of the UK defined benefit pension plan. The
net deficit, as at 31 March 2005, amounted to £13.1 million. The
principal differences between the IAS 19 deficit and the actuarial
valuation are as follows:

Actuarial valuation
Investment returns
Variation in assumptions relating to discount rates
Death in service liability
Other factors

IAS 19 deficit

£000

(13,100)
4,500
(11,700)
(1,000)
1,074

(20,226)

As already commented on in the Chief Executive’s Review, the
additional net investment in working capital this year was due 
to the inventory investment required to support the additional
capacity available from the new and extended facilities. This
additional inventory investment amounted to £9.0 million.

Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash outflows from investing activities totalled £9.5 million
compared with £16.8 million during 2004. The year on year
reduction was attributable to lower levels of expenditure on
acquisitions and investment in property, plant and equipment.
For 2006, gross investment on property, plant and equipment is
forecast to increase to approximately £15.3 million.

Changes in net funds
Group net funds remained virtually unchanged compared with
2004 at £35.5 million.

Stephen Wilson, Group Finance Director

Following final determination of the valuation, the company and
trustees of the UK plan discussed a number of alternatives to
assist with mitigating the cost of the plan. However, it was
decided that these alternative arrangements would penalise the
active members who currently represent 18% of total plan
membership.

The company has elected to maintain its commitment to the plan
and in order to discharge the deficit, agreed to pay additional
contributions. The additional contributions are intended to
remove the deficit over 15 years, a period that equates with the
average remaining working life of active plan members and will
be subject to review every three years at the time the plan
actuary completes the plan valuation. Additional contributions
during 2005 amounted to £722,000. These additional amounts 
to be paid in 2006 will total £1,080,000 and contributions will
increase at the rate of salary inflation thereafter.

CASH FLOWS AND NET FUNDS

Cash generated from operating activities
Net cash generated from operating activities was £22.7 million, 
a decrease of £10.1 million compared with last year. The main
reason for this decline was the net investment in working capital
in 2005 of £10.7 million compared with a net cash release from
working capital in 2004 of £2.7 million.

24

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Directors, Officers and Advisors

BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

T G Larman ◆●■
Non-executive Chairman
Trevor was appointed a non-executive director
in March 1994 and became Chairman on 
1 January 2000. He was formerly the Finance
Director of NFC plc (now Exel plc). He is a
fellow of the Institute of Chartered Certified
Accountants and a fellow of the Association 
of Corporate Treasurers. Age 60. 

A J Brewer ■
Group Chief Executive
Tony was appointed an executive director in
June 1991, becoming Managing Director of the
Floorcoverings Division in January 1992, and
was appointed Group Chief Executive in
November 2000. He has 28 years experience 
in the floorcovering industry. Age 45.

G Waldron ❉
Executive Director
Graham was appointed an executive director in
June 1991. He is the non-executive Chairman of
Tandem Group plc. He has 53 years experience
in the floorcovering industry. Age 75. 

S G Wilson 
Group Finance Director
Steve was appointed Group Finance Director in
December 1991. He is the non-executive
Chairman of Synergy Healthcare plc and is a
fellow of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants. Age 51. 

T J Anderson ◆●■
Non-executive Director
Tom was appointed a non-executive director in
August 1998 and has chaired the Remuneration
Committee since December 1998. He was
formerly a non-executive director of Azlan
Group PLC and a group general manager of
Electrocomponents Plc. He is a chartered
engineer and a member of the Institute of
Electrical Engineers. Age 67.

R J Dickens, CBE, DL ◆●■
Non-executive Director
Roger was appointed a non-executive director
in February 2004 and chaired the Audit
Committee since March 2004. Age 58. Sadly
Roger passed away on 29 January 2006.

R W Peters ◆●■
Non-executive Director
Dick was appointed a non-executive director in
December 2005. He was formerly Senior Partner
for the East Midlands practice of Deloitte &
Touche in Nottingham. He is a BSc in
Mathematics and Statistics and is a fellow of
the Institute of Chartered Accountants. Age 51. 

A R Judge ▲
Managing Director, Coleshill and Tamworth
businesses
Tony joined the company in May 1992 and is
Managing Director of all businesses operating
from the Coleshill and Tamworth distribution
centres. Tony has 25 years experience in the
floorcovering industry. Age 41.  

M K O’Leary ◆●■
Non-executive Director
Mike was appointed a non-executive director in
March 2006. He has more than twenty years of
public company board experience, focused
primarily in the technology sector. He spent 14
years in helping to build Misys into a global FTSE
100 company following its initial public offering
in 1987 and has also served as Chief Executive
at Marlborough Stirling, a FTSE 250 outsourcing
business. Mike has worked in domestic and
international markets and brings a wealth of
general management experience to the company.
Age 53. 

G M Duggan 
Company Secretary
Geoff joined the company in April 1998. He is
an associate of the Institute of Chartered
Secretaries and Administrators and a fellow of
the Chartered Institute of Management
Accountants. Age 45. 

◆ Audit committee
● Remuneration committee
■ Nomination committee
▲ Executive management 
❉ Charities committee

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 

A J W Simpson ▲
Managing Director UK Operations
Andrew joined the company during September
1991 and is the Managing Director of UK
Operations. Andrew has 33 years experience in
the floorcovering industry. Age 53.  

G B Phillips ▲
Finance Director Operations
Gary joined the company in June 1992 and is
the Finance Director of floorcovering
operations. He is an associate of the Chartered
Institute of Management Accountants. Age 42.  

K R Yates ▲
Managing Director, Mercado
Keith joined Mercado in April 1983 and was
subsequently appointed its Managing Director
in 1996. Keith has 23 years experience in the
floorcovering industry. Age 50. 

ADVISERS

Auditors
KPMG Audit Plc
2 Cornwall Street
Birmingham B3 2DL

Taxation Advisers
Deloitte & Touche
Four Brindleyplace
Birmingham B1 2HZ

Principal Bankers
Barclays Bank PLC
PO Box 34
15 Colmore Row
Birmingham B3 2BY

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
Corporate and Institutional Banking
5th Floor, 2 St Philips Place
Birmingham B3 2RB

Solicitors
Eversheds
115 Colmore Row
Birmingham B3 3AL

Stockbrokers
Arden Partners Limited
Arden House
17 Highfield Road, Edgbaston
Birmingham B15 3DU

Registrars
Capita Registrars
Northern House
Woodsome Park
Fenay Bridge
Huddersfield HD8 0LA

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

25

Financial Calendar

Group Results
Annual General Meeting
Interim results announced
Full year results announced

Dividend Dates
Final dividend for 2005, if approved, payable to qualifying shareholders on the 

register as at 9 June 2006

Interim dividend for 2006 announced
Interim dividend for 2006 payable

1 June 2006
September 2006
March 2007

3 July 2006
September 2006
January 2007

26

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Director’s Report

The directors present their annual report and the audited
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005. 

Roger Dickens sadly passed away on 19th January 2006.

Directors
The names of the directors of the company at the date of this
report and biographical details are given on page 24. A complete
list of directors who served during the year is shown within the
remuneration report on page 41. No other person has acted as 
a director of the company during the financial year ended 
31 December 2005. Details of directors’ service contracts are
given in the report on corporate governance. 

The company’s articles require that one third of the directors
retire by rotation each year. Accordingly, the directors retiring by
rotation at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) are
Graham Waldron and Tony Brewer, both of whom, being eligible,
offer themselves for re-election. The ordinary resolution for the
re-election of Graham Waldron will expire at the conclusion of
the next AGM. 

Dick Peters was appointed to the board on 1 December 2005 and,
in accordance with the company’s articles of association, offers
himself for election at the forthcoming AGM. Dick has recently
retired as the Senior Partner for the East Midlands practice of
Deloitte & Touche based in Nottingham. He has considerable
experience of auditing large companies, both UK and overseas,
transactional support and project management activities and the
board believes that his business knowledge and considerable
financial and management expertise will be a positive
contribution as the group continues to develop. In accordance
with the recommendations of the Combined Code relating to non-
executive directors, the board believes that Dick Peters should be
elected and makes such a recommendation to shareholders. 

Mike O’Leary was appointed to the board on 10 March 2006 and
in accordance with the company’s articles of association, offers
himself for election at the forthcoming AGM. Mike has more than
twenty years of public company board experience, focused
primarily in the technology sector. He has worked in domestic
and international markets and brings a wealth of general
management experience to the company. In accordance with the
recommendations of the Combined Code relating to non-executive
directors, the board believes that Mike O’Leary should be elected
and makes such a recommendation to shareholders.

Trevor Larman retires from the board at the conclusion of the
forthcoming AGM having completed twelve years as a non-
executive director, at which time he will be succeeded in the
short term by Graham Waldron. It had been the board’s intention
that Roger Dickens succeed Trevor however this sadly was not
possible. We are actively seeking to appoint an additional non-
executive director and would hope to be able to announce a
successor to Graham in the next twelve months. Graham has
extensive experience in the flooring industry and has guided the
company for many years, serving as Chairman from 1991 until
2000 when Trevor was appointed. Graham will not be joining the
various committees of the board and will not participate in any
bonus or share option schemes. 

No director had, at any time during the period under review, a
material interest in any contract with the company or any of its
subsidiaries.

Directors’ interests in the company’s shares are shown on pages
42 and 43.

Principal activity
The group’s activities are wholly aligned to the sales, marketing,
supply and distribution of floorcovering products. The principal
subsidiary undertakings are listed on page 109. 

Review of the business
A review of the group’s trading operations and future
developments is contained in the Chairman’s Statement, the
Group Chief Executive’s Review and the Financial Review on pages
10 to 23.

Dividends
An interim dividend of 4.4p per share (2004: 4.00p) was paid on
3 January 2006 and your board is recommending a final dividend
of 13.60p per share (2004: 12.25p), making a total dividend of
18.00p per share for the year (2004: 16.25p). The final dividend,
if approved by shareholders at the AGM, will be payable on 
3 July 2006 to shareholders whose names appear on the register
at the close of business on 9 June 2006.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

27

Director’s Report continued

Supplier payment policy
The group’s policy with regard to the payment of suppliers is to
agree the terms of payment as part of the conditions of supply of
goods and services. The group seeks to strictly comply with these
payment terms whenever it is satisfied that the supplier has
provided the goods and services in accordance with the agreed
terms and conditions. The payment policy has been and will
continue to be developed to meet the group’s specific
requirements and is not based on any particular code or standard
relating to payment practice. The number of creditor days of the
company at 31 December 2005 was 41 days (2004: 41 days).

Employment, training and development
The group remains committed to providing a workplace that is
safe and environmentally sound and which complies with
applicable laws and regulations. The group expects employees to
respect confidential information and company time and assets
and believes in open and honest communication, fair treatment
and equal opportunities. The group supports the fundamental
principles of good governance.

It is the group’s policy that employment opportunities, training,
career development and promotion should be available to all,
irrespective of age, gender, ethnic origin, religion or disability.
Due consideration is given to applications for employment, having
regard to the particular aptitudes and abilities of the applicants.
Any employee who develops a disability during employment is
given the opportunity to retrain for alternative employment
where practicable, given the nature of the group’s activities. 

The group’s human resources policies are available to all staff 
and include guidance on employment matters, ethics, equal
opportunities, staff benefits and training and development.

It is the group’s continued practice to maintain employee
participation and involvement in matters which affect their
interests. The group places considerable value on the
involvement of its employees and has continued to keep them
informed on matters affecting them as employees and on the
various factors affecting the performance of the group. This is
achieved through formal and informal meetings and through the
annual and interim financial statements. Employee
representatives are consulted regularly on a wide range of
matters affecting their current and future interests. 

The directors encourage employee interest in the group’s
performance through the executive and savings related share
option schemes. 

Employee turnover remains low and as a result the employee
base remains stable. The group is firmly committed to developing
the potential of its people and regularly reviews its succession
planning processes. Recruitment, training and development is
designed to ensure the group has suitably skilled and qualified
employees to meet the operational needs of the business and
offer the opportunity for employees to develop and grow.
Training is delivered primarily through internal resources with
assistance from external providers on specialist subjects as and
when required.

The group considers it important that its employees provide for
their retirement and accordingly provides opportunities for them
to participate in retirement programmes.

Health and safety
The group monitors its health and safety processes and seeks to
make continual improvements. The group provides guidance and
solutions to the operating businesses on all aspects of health
and safety and serves to strengthen further the health and safety
culture within the group. The system sets and closely monitors
the achievement of standards for health and safety on all sites
and during the year the average performance exceeded the
benchmark standard set by the group. The board is committed to
ensuring that the group’s activities are carried out in accordance
with relevant statutory provisions and all reasonable and
appropriate measures are taken to avoid risk to employees or
others who may be affected. Whilst management is committed to
providing a safe working environment with the appropriate
working practices and training, this can only be achieved if
employees equally give their commitment to a rigorous health
and safety culture. The group continues to improve its health and
safety performance with a reduction in reportable accidents and
dangerous occurrences to the Health and Safety Executive. There
were no prosecutions for breaches of health and safety in the
year and furthermore, there were no fatalities. 

28

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Director’s Report continued

Corporate and Social Responsibility
Introduction
This is the first year that we have formally reported on our
environmental and social responsibility performance. Whilst we
have not previously highlighted these aspects of the business, we
have had a management structure in place for many years that
allows the consideration of social and environmental factors by
both individual businesses within the group and also at a group
level. Our links with external stakeholders continue to grow
including improved customer liaison and community involvement.

We monitor our performance against objectives with the aim of
continual improvement. In addition to improvements in respect
of environmental and social responsibility performance, we have
continued to make positive moves in waste and energy
management, supply chain accountability, sustainable development,
health and safety and staff development and welfare. 

Our policy
Our policy sets out the framework for the development and
implementation of corporate social responsibility activities across
the group.

We will conduct all our business activities in a fair and balanced
manner, respecting and responding to legal, social and ethical
issues arising from our commercial activities. 

We are committed across the group to continued progress in the
following areas:
• improving the quality of our products, processes and services.
• becoming an employer of choice.
• improving our health and safety performance.
• working with the local communities around our businesses.
• protecting the environment.
• achieving sustained growth and profitability.

These areas reflect our main responsibilities as the leading
European floorcovering distributor. They will be widened to
encompass other stakeholders as our corporate and social
responsibility programme develops.

Improving the quality of our products, processes and
services
We aim to increase awareness and communication of the
environmental strategy and commitments through a programme
of employee training.   

We work with our main suppliers to improve working practices
and the environmental management of our supply chain,
although we recognise that many of our main suppliers already
work to exacting standards. We seek to improve in these areas
and would comment on our commitment as follows: 

• increase the use of environmental specification.
• increase the volume of certified sustainable natural products.
• reduce the amount of CO2 emissions.
• reduce fuel consumption and vehicle emissions.
• reduce the amount of waste sent to landfill.
• increase recycling rates.
• reduce the amount of packaging.
• increase the use of green energy.
• reduce water consumption.
• encourage the use of whole life cost assessments.
• encourage pollution prevention initiatives.

We seek to reduce energy and water consumption through the
development of an awareness programme communicated to
employees, the introduction on repair, renewal or installation of
energy or water efficient techniques and equipment. 

We continue to invest in the commercial and private vehicles
that we operate replacing them every five and three years
respectively, so improving operational efficiencies and reducing
operating costs and vehicle emissions.   

Our operations predominantly create waste materials in the form
of protective plastic wrapping, cardboard and wooden pallets. We
aim to collect the plastic and cardboard in discreet types and,
with the use of baler units that we have invested in over the last
few years, despatch these to specialist re-processing agents.
Wooden pallets are re-cycled where possible or sent to specialist
re-processors. In addition we recycle the cardboard poles that are
used in the centre of rolls of carpet and vinyl until they are no
longer capable of being re-used. In these ways we seek to reduce
the amount of waste that is sent to landfill sites. Guidance on
waste management is issued to the managers of the individual
businesses to increase awareness of the need to control waste.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

29

Director’s Report continued

Corporate and Social Responsibility – continued
We continue to work with our suppliers to improve the re-cycling
content of packaging materials and consequently reduce our
packaging waste.

Becoming an employer of choice
At the heart of the group are our people who seek to deliver
their best for the business, which combined with a fair and
responsive way of doing business, generates a common ambition
to add significant value. Our policy towards employees is set out
above in the section on employment, training and development.

Improving our health and safety performance
The group attaches great significance to the management of the
health, safety and welfare of both its employees and others. To
this end we have adopted a policy that is available for inspection
at all operating locations and which is reviewed on a regular basis. 

The board has put in place policies that seek to ensure that
group operations are carried out at all times in such a manner as
to ensure, so far as it is reasonably practicable, the health and
safety at work of employees and all persons likely to be affected,
including other contractors, clients, staff and members of the
public where appropriate.

The value of employee participation in delivering this commitment
is recognised and management teams are encouraged to create a
supportive culture. To achieve this we endeavour to ensure that:

Protecting the environment
We have a structure in place that facilitates the pooling of
information and resources to ensure best practice is shared 
across the group. In recognising our responsibility to protect the
environment we have adopted an environmental policy which is
reviewed periodically. Our policy seeks to cover the various
aspects that affect our businesses, including the following:

• maintaining a management framework for implementing the

environmental policy objectives into business decision making,
alongside commercial, safety and other factors.

• complying with applicable environment legislation, regulations

and standards.

• developing operational procedures designed to minimise

pollution risks and to deal effectively with any incidents which
occur.

• taking positive action to minimise waste and to encourage

recycling wherever practical.

• improving efficiency in the use of facilities, energy, water and

raw materials.

• working with our advisors, suppliers and sub-contractors to
ensure effective environmental supply chain management,
alongside quality, price and other purchasing criteria.

• reducing the environmental impact of our products through

improved design and specification.

• training employees to enhance their awareness of, and

commitment to, maximising environmental performance.

• reviewing the group’s environmental policy periodically to take

• We continue to improve health and safety systems, procedures

account of organisational, legislative and fiscal changes.

and guidance.

• Personnel are aware of this policy.
• We maintain high standards of health and safety.
• A consistent reporting structure is maintained.
• Adequate resources are provided.

Further details are given above in the section on health and safety.

Working with the local communities around our businesses.
We recognise that our business should be conducted in a socially
as well as environmentally responsible way. Listening to and
learning from what our customers, employees, suppliers and
other stakeholders tell us about what is important to them is a
feature of how we work. It has helped us keep in touch with
what is happening in the markets in which we operate. We are
committed to managing the social responsibilities connected
with our business in an open and honest way. 

The group seeks to improve its environmental performance and to
minimise the impact of its operations. 

Achieving sustained growth and profitability
Whilst achieving the groups goal of sustained growth and
profitability in future years, there are a number of key areas
which will assist in attaining the financial objectives at the same
time as meeting our corporate social responsibility obligations.

Through improving our understanding and control of our supply
chain, we shall be investigating the benefits from using green
specification guides and developing an appropriate strategy. 
We shall continue to work with suppliers to ensure products are
supplied from renewable sources and that their manufacturing
processes fairly reward employees and do not seek to exploit. 
We shall continue to work with our suppliers to investigate the
potential for improvements in product design. 

30

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Director’s Report continued

Corporate and Social Responsibility – continued
We place great importance on effectively managing our operations
to minimise the likelihood of adverse impact. We pro-actively
manage our facilities to minimise energy consumption utilising
energy efficient lighting and heating. Our new sites are subjected
to an environmental assessment prior to any construction taking
place. This allows solutions to any identified environmental issues
to be incorporated into the planning process. Recognising that
development can be potentially damaging, we seek to minimise
energy consumption during the construction of new premises and
the effects on the environment. Wherever possible, subject to the
operating constraints of the business, existing trees and vegetation
are retained and augmented as necessary. Existing sites are
maintained in a tidy condition to minimise ecological impact.  

As part of our commitment to sustainable development we work
with transport consultants to formulate green travel plans
incorporating car sharing schemes and provision for bicycles
when designing new facilities.

We recognise that our business operations will be around for
many years, having an impact on future generations, and to this
end we work with local authorities to design new properties
which not only comply with guidelines but seek to blend in with
their surroundings through the careful use of quality materials,
landscaping and design features. We support the desire to see
development take place in sustainable locations. Our new facility
under construction in Leeds to re-house the Wilkies business is
on the site of a former engineering business, the former premises
having been removed by specialists and areas of environmental
concern remediated. 

Financial Risk Management
The financial risk management and objectives of the group and
the exposure of the group to credit, interest rate and foreign
currency risk are set out in note 23. 

Donations
The group’s Charities Committee considers requests for charitable
donations within a set criteria. The group contributed charitable
donations of £36,289 (2004: £26,705) during the year. The board
has maintained its policy of not making political donations.

Share Capital
Details of the company’s share capital, including the number of
shares issued during the period under review are given in note 22
to the financial statements. Since the year end the company has
issued 194,613 ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of
options under the Headlam Group 2002 Savings Related Share
Option Scheme. 

During the year under review options over 1,300,000 shares
(2004: nil) were granted to the group’s directors and employees
under the company’s share option schemes.

Substantial shareholdings
At the date of this report, the following interests in 3% or more
of the issued ordinary share capital had been notified to the
company.

Number of shares

%

Legal & General
Investment Management
Aberforth Smaller Companies 
trust plc
Aviva plc

3,346,519

2,744,600
2,715,594

3.89

3.17
3.15

AGM
The notice of the fifty eighth AGM to be held at 10.00am on 
1 June 2006 at the group’s distribution facility in Coleshill,
Warwickshire has been mailed to shareholders with this Annual
Report. 

Allotment of shares
The directors have received authority from shareholders to allot
ordinary shares for cash otherwise than on a pro-rata basis. The
authority is limited to allotting up to 4,335,748 ordinary shares,
representing approximately 5% of the issued share capital at
that time. Although no such issues have been made, the
directors will seek renewal of these two authorities from
shareholders at the AGM.

Purchase of own shares
In common with many other companies, the group seeks annually
a limited authority from shareholders to purchase its own ordinary
shares. Legislation now permits shares purchased by the company
to be held in treasury rather than being cancelled immediately,
for future resale in the market, for use in connection with
employee share schemes or for cancellation at a later date. The
purchase of the company’s own shares would only be made if the
directors regarded such purchase as earnings enhancing.
Although no such purchases have been made, the directors will
seek to renew the authority from shareholders at the AGM.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

31

Director’s Report continued

Corporate and Social Responsibility – continued
Directors fees
Article 98 of the articles of association of the company prescribes
the maximum amount in fees payable in aggregate to non-executive
directors each year. Current fees for non-executive directors are
approaching this figure and the board believes that it is prudent
to raise the authority thereunder to allow the board, should it
deem it appropriate, to increase non-executive fees beyond that
level. It is therefore proposed to increase the maximum amount
from £150,000 to £200,000.

Indemnity to Directors and Officers
The articles of association of the company currently provide that
every director or other officer of the company shall, in certain
circumstances, be indemnified out of the assets of the company
against any liability incurred by him in defending any
proceedings, whether civil or criminal, for negligence, default,
breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the affairs of the
company. The amendment proposed by resolution 11 of the
notice of meeting will, if approved, enable the company to make
use of the changes introduced by the Companies (Audit,
Investigations and Community Enterprise) Act 2004 that relax
certain of the current prohibitions on companies indemnifying
their directors against liability and permit companies to pay
directors’ defence costs as they are incurred.

Auditors
KPMG Audit Plc has expressed its willingness to continue in office
as auditor of the company and a resolution for its re-appointment
and to authorise the directors to agree its remuneration will be
proposed at the forthcoming AGM. Auditors remuneration and
fees paid are set out in note 3 to the financial statements.

Corporate Governance 
The Combined Code on Corporate Governance came into effect for
UK listed companies for reporting years beginning on or after 
1 November 2003. Following publication of the Code, the board
reviewed its procedures with a view to complying with its
detailed provisions. The following paragraphs, together with the
report on directors’ remuneration on pages 38 to 44, provide a
description of how the group has applied the main and
supporting principles of the Combined Code. The directors’
statement of compliance with the Code is given on page 37.

The Board of Directors
The board is collectively responsible for the success of the group.
Its role is to provide entrepreneurial leadership within a
framework of prudent and effective controls which enables risk to
be assessed and managed; to set strategic aims, ensure that the
necessary financial and human resources are in place to meet its
objectives, review management performance; to set the group’s
values and standards and ensure that its obligations to its
shareholders and others are understood and met. 

Specific responsibilities reserved to the board include:

• setting group strategy and approving an annual budget and

medium term projections.

• reviewing operational and financial performance.
• approving acquisitions, divestments and capital expenditure.
• reviewing the group’s systems of financial control and risk

management.

• ensuring that appropriate management development and

succession plans are in place.

• reviewing the health and safety and environmental

performance of the group.

• approving appointments to the board and to the position of

Company Secretary, and approving policies relating to directors’
remuneration and the severance of directors’ contracts.
• ensuring that a satisfactory dialogue takes place with

shareholders.

The directors’ responsibility for the preparation of accounts is
explained on page 45. The directors confirmation that they
consider it appropriate to prepare the accounts for 2005 on a
going concern basis is given on page 37.

Further details of the board’s role in relation to the group’s
systems of internal control and risk management are given on
pages 35 and 36. Descriptions of the specific responsibilities
which have been delegated to the principal board committees 
are given on pages 33 to 34.

At the end of 2005 the board comprised three executive and four
non-executive directors including the Chairman. Biographical
details of the directors are given on page 24. With the exception
of the Chairman, who is presumed under the Combined Code not
to be independent, all the non-executive directors are regarded
by the board as independent. The board does not consider that
any relationships or circumstances exist that are likely to affect
the judgement of any director.

32

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Director’s Report continued

Corporate Governance – continued
The board normally meets ten times a year, including at least one
meeting at a group operating business. Comprehensive briefing
papers are provided to all directors one week before board
meetings. During the year there are sufficient opportunities for
the Chairman to meet with the non-executive directors without
the executive directors being present should this be deemed
appropriate. 

All directors have direct access to the advice and services of the
Company Secretary who is tasked with ensuring that board
procedures are followed. In addition, directors may, in
furtherance of their duties, take independent professional advice,
if necessary, at the company’s expense.

Chairman and Chief Executive
The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive are split. Whilst
collectively they are responsible for the leadership of the group,
the Chairman’s primary responsibility is for leading the board and
ensuring its effectiveness and the Group Chief Executive is
responsible for running the business.

The other significant current commitments of the Chairman are
listed in his biography on page 24 and the board is satisfied that
his existing commitments do not unduly restrict his availability
to the group.

Induction and professional development
On joining the board, a director receives a comprehensive
induction pack which includes background information about the
group and its directors, details of board meeting procedures,
directors’ responsibilities, procedures for dealing in company
shares and a number of other governance-related issues. The
director meets with the Group Chief Executive to be briefed on
the general group strategy encompassing visits to group
businesses. External training, particularly on matters relating to
the role of a director and the role and responsibilities of board
committees, is arranged as appropriate. Ongoing training is
provided as and when necessary and may be identified in annual
performance reviews or on an ad hoc basis. The suitability of
external courses is kept under review by the Company Secretary.
Training and development of directors in the year took various
forms, including visits to group businesses, both with the board
as a whole and with the Group Chief Executive, and attendance
by certain directors at courses run by professional bodies and
solicitors, attendance at external training sessions and seminars
on matters relevant to members of remuneration committees,

seminars facilitated by external audit practices on the
implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards
and workshops run by external bodies on various commercial and
regulatory matters.

Board appointments and performance evaluation
There is a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure for the
appointment of new directors to the board. This is described in
the section on the nominations committee below. The non-
executive directors are initially appointed for a three-year term
and, subject to review and re-election, can serve up to a
maximum of three such terms.

During the year, using an in-house process the board conducted,
a formal and rigorous evaluation of its own performance and that
of its committees and individual directors, including the
Chairman. The process involved the completion of detailed
questionnaires in respect of each board member. The output from
the questionnaires was compiled into a report prepared for the
board at its meeting in October. No actions were considered
necessary as a result of the evaluations. The board intends to
conduct a further evaluation of its performance during 2006.

Director re-election
All directors are subject to re-election by shareholders at the first
AGM following their appointment by the board. Under the articles
of association of the company, each of the directors is required
to retire by rotation at least once every three years. Details of
the directors retiring and seeking re-election at an AGM are given
to shareholders in the Notice of Meeting.

Communicating with shareholders
Meetings between directors, senior management and major
institutional shareholders are held during the year.

The Senior Independent Director and the other non-executive
directors are encouraged to attend presentations to analysts and
shareholders, in particular the annual and interim results
presentations.

The Group Finance Director reports twice a year to the board on
meetings with investors. These reports include summaries
prepared by the company’s brokers on the market’s reaction to
results announcements and the subsequent meetings between
management and investors. External brokers’ reports on the
company are circulated to all directors.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

33

Director’s Report continued

Corporate Governance – continued
All directors normally attend the AGM and shareholders are
invited to ask questions during the meeting and to meet with
directors after the formal proceedings have ended. Shareholders
at the meeting are advised as to the level of proxy votes
received, including the percentage for and against each
resolution together with the level of abstentions, following 
each vote on a show of hands. 

The group seeks to present an accurate, objective and balanced
picture in its annual and interim reports, trading statements,
results presentations and City announcements in a style and
format which is appropriate to the intended audience. Copies 
of annual and interim reports are available on its website.

Board Committees
The terms of reference of the following board committees are
available upon request.

Audit Committee
The audit committee consists of the independent non-executive
directors which operated under the Chairmanship of Roger
Dickens during 2005.

Following the death of Roger Dickens subsequent to the year end,
Dick Peters was appointed Chairman of the audit committee on
27 February 2006 having joined the audit committee in
December 2005. The committee monitors the integrity of the
company’s financial statements and the effectiveness of the
external audit process. It is responsible for ensuring that an
appropriate relationship between the company and the external
auditors is maintained, including reviewing non-audit services
and fees, and makes recommendations to the board on the
appointment, reappointment or dismissal of the external
auditors. It also reviews the group’s systems of internal control
and the processes for monitoring and evaluating the risks facing
the group on an ongoing basis. 

The committee periodically reviews its terms of reference and its
effectiveness and recommends to the board any changes required
as a result of such review. The audit committee meets at least
twice a year, including meetings before the annual and interim
results announcements. 

Members’ attendance record at meetings of the committee in
2005 is given on page 35. The committee has authority to
investigate any matters within its terms of reference, to access
resources, to call for information and to obtain external
professional advice at the cost of the company.

Only members of the committee are entitled to be present at
meetings however the auditors, Group Chief Executive and Group
Finance Director attend when appropriate. At each meeting there
is an opportunity for the external auditors to discuss matters
with the committee without any executive management being
present. The committee has independent access to the external
auditors who have direct access to the Chairman of the
committee outside formal committee meetings. The Audit
committee has the specific task of keeping under review the
nature and extent of non-audit services provided by the external
auditors in order to ensure that objectivity and independence are
maintained. The external auditors have in place processes to
ensure their independence is maintained including safeguards to
ensure that, where they do provide non-audit services, their
independence is not compromised. They have written to the
audit committee confirming that, in their opinion, they are
independent. 

In 2005, the audit committee discharged its responsibilities by:

• reviewing the group’s draft 2004 preliminary annual results
announcement and financial statements and 2005 interim
results statement prior to board approval, including
consideration of the significant accounting judgements
contained therein, and reviewing the external auditors’
detailed reports thereon.

• reviewing the group’s trading update announcement prior to

release at the AGM.

• reviewing the appropriateness of the group’s accounting
policies including changes necessary in the light of the
transition to IFRS.

• reviewing regularly the potential impact on the group’s

financial statements of certain matters such as impairment 
of asset values, employee benefits and IFRS.

34

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Director’s Report continued

Corporate Governance – continued
• reviewing the effectiveness of the 2004 external audit process
and recommending to the board, after due consideration, the
reappointment of the incumbent external auditors at the AGM.

• reviewing the application of the board’s policy on non-audit

work performed by the group’s external auditors together with
the non-audit fees payable to the external auditors in 2004.

• reviewing the external auditors’ plan for the audit of the

group’s 2005 accounts, which included key areas of focus, key
risks on the accounts, confirmations of auditor independence
and the proposed audit fee, and approving the terms of
engagement for the audit.

• reviewing reports from the external auditors on the group’s

systems of internal control in advance of the announcement of
the group’s results for 2004 (the internal report included a
summary of and commentary on the business risks and internal
control processes) and reporting to the board on the results of
this review, and reviewing interim updates prior to the interim
results.

• receiving regular updates from management on key financial

control matters arising in the group.

• reviewing the results of the performance evaluation

questionnaire (see page 32) as it related to the committee and
approving certain consequential changes to the committee’s
procedures.

Remuneration Committee
The remuneration committee consists of the independent non-
executive directors under the chairmanship of Tom Anderson. The
committee is responsible for approving the terms of service and
setting the remuneration of the executive directors in accordance
with a remuneration policy which is approved by the board. It is
also responsible for determining the terms upon which the
service of executive directors is terminated, and for monitoring
the remuneration of senior managers just below board level. Non-
executive directors’ fees are determined by the board as a whole
and no director may influence their own remuneration benefits.

The committee meets periodically when required. Members’
attendance record at meetings of the committee in 2005 is given
on page 35. Only the members of the committee are entitled to
be present at meetings however the Group Chief Executive and
Group Finance Director attend when appropriate. The committee
has access to such information and advice both from within the
group and externally, at the cost of the company, as it deems
necessary. It is responsible for appointing consultants in respect
of executive directors’ remuneration.

The committee’s report on directors remuneration is set out in
the remuneration report on page 41.

Nominations Committee
The nominations committee consists of the non-executive
directors and the Chief Executive under the chairmanship in 2005
of Roger Dickens (except when the committee is dealing with the
appointment of a successor as Chairman of the board when the
Senior Independent Director chairs the committee). The
committee leads the process for identifying and makes
recommendations to the board on candidates for appointment as
directors of the company and as Company Secretary, giving full
consideration to succession planning and the leadership needs of
the group. It also makes recommendations to the board on the
composition and chairmanship of the audit and remuneration
committees. It keeps under review the structure, size and
composition of the board, including the balance of skills,
knowledge and experience and the independence of the non-
executive directors, and makes recommendations to the board
with regard to any changes. The committee meets periodically
when required. Members’ attendance record at meetings of the
committee in 2005 is given on page 35. Only members of the
committee are entitled to be present at meetings but others may
be invited by the committee to attend. The board has agreed the
procedures to be followed by the nominations committee in
making appointments to the various positions on the board and
as Company Secretary. The committee has access to such
information and advice both from within the group and
externally, at the cost of the company, as it deems necessary.
This may include the appointment of external executive search
consultants, where appropriate. The procedures referred to above
were used in the appointment during 2005 of Dick Peters as a
non-executive director. This included an assessment of the time
commitment expected from the director. Independent executive
search consultants were not used in connection with the
appointment.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

35

Director’s Report continued

Corporate Governance – continued
Directors’ attendance record
The attendance of directors at relevant meetings of the board
and of the remuneration, audit and nominations committees held
during 2005 was as follows:

Scheduled 
board 
(10 meetings)

Remuneration 
committee 
(3 meetings)

Audit
committee 
(3 meetings)

Nominations
committee
(4 meetings)

Non-executive director 
Trevor Larman (Chairman)

Executive directors
Tony Brewer (Group Chief Executive)
Stephen Wilson (Group Finance Director)
Graham Waldron

Non-executive directors
Tom Anderson (Senior Independent Director)
Roger Dickens
Dick Peters 
(appointed 1 December 2005)

10

10
10
10

10
6
1/1# 

3

*
*
*

3
0
1/1# 

3

*
*
*

3
0
1/1# 

4

4
*
*

4
1
1/1# 

*Executive directors do not attend these meetings unless invited to do so by the committee Chairman.

# Actual attendance/maximum number of meetings director could attend as a member.

Risk Management and Internal Controls
In accordance with the guidance of the Turnbull committee, the
directors are responsible for establishing and maintaining the
group’s systems of internal control and for reviewing their
effectiveness. The systems are designed to meet the group’s
particular needs and to manage, rather than eliminate, the risks
to which the businesses are exposed. By their nature, they
provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against
material misstatement or loss. The board considers that
the measures taken, including physical controls, segregation of
duties and reviews by management, provide sufficient and
objective assurance.

During the year the board maintained its process of hierarchical
reporting and review in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the
group’s system of financial and non-financial controls. The group
has developed a comprehensive series of operating and financial
control procedures which are applied at all businesses and the
group finance team perform annual reviews to verify that the
businesses are complying with the prescribed operating and
financial control procedures. In addition, the board reviews the
group’s high level internal controls and risk management
arrangements. Furthermore, the audit committee receive reports
from the external auditor on matters identified in the course of
its statutory audit work. 

36

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Director’s Report continued

Corporate Governance – continued
These provide a documented and auditable trail of accountability,
the results of which are periodically reviewed by management for
completeness and accuracy. These procedures allow for successive
assurances to be given at increasingly higher levels of
management through to the board. Planned corrective actions 
are monitored for timely completion. Having reviewed its
effectiveness, the directors are not aware of anything in the
group’s system of controls during the period covered by this
report and accounts which could render them ineffective. There
were no changes in the group’s internal controls or financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to affect, the group’s system of internal control. 

The group operates a comprehensive planning system, including
detailed reviews at all subsidiary undertakings, together with
formal reviews and approval of annual plans by the board. Actual
performance is reported on a monthly basis measured against
plan and prior year including a detailed explanation of major
variances. The company and its subsidiary undertakings have
implemented control procedures designed to ensure complete and
accurate accounting for financial transactions and
to limit the potential exposure to fraud. The group has clearly
defined guidelines for capital expenditure and investment
appraisal. These include annual plans, detailed appraisal and
review procedures, levels of authority and due diligence
requirements when businesses are acquired. Any acquisition or
disposal of a business needs formal board approval. The board
reports that full procedures are in place to achieve compliance
with the internal control aspects of the Code for the next
financial period.

The output of these reviews form an important element of
management reporting and a process is in place for monitoring
the achievement of action plans together with the identification
of new and emerging risks. An ongoing process of risk
management and internal control in accordance with the Code
has been in place for the financial year under review and up to
the date of this report. The group views the careful management
of risk as a key management activity in delivering business
opportunities. The ethos of the group, delegation of
responsibility and other control procedures together with
accounting policies and procedures are communicated through
the group and laid out in the group procedures manual which is
periodically updated. 

The objective of the group’s risk management processes is to
ensure sustainable development through the conduct of its
business in a way which:

• satisfies its customers.
• maintains proper relationships with suppliers and contractors.
• protects against losses from unforeseen causes.
• provides a safe and healthy workplace.
• develops environmentally friendly processes.
• minimises the cost and consumption of increasingly scarce

resources.

• prevents pollution and waste.
• maintains a positive relationship with the communities in

which it does business.

A high standard of health and safety management is promoted 
at all levels within the group. The group’s health and safety
approach is supported by training programmes at operating
businesses, group health and safety rules and monitoring and
auditing to promote a high level of awareness and commitment.
Individual businesses are assessed on a periodic basis, and
remedial solutions implemented where necessary. Line
management retain the responsibility for completion of 
action plans with progress being monitored and reported. 

The audit committee meets at least twice a year and in
accordance with its terms of reference, reviews the effectiveness
of the group’s systems of internal control. In accordance with the
Code the board has undertaken an assessment of the need for a
group internal audit function. The board considers that the
control systems and procedures undertaken by the group are
adequately performed by management and therefore does not
currently propose to introduce a group internal audit function 
but will keep the matter under review.

The integrity and competence of personnel is assessed during 
the recruitment process and monitored throughout employment.
Ethical standards expected of personnel are laid out in the group
procedures manual.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

37

Director’s Report continued

Corporate Governance – continued
Compliance with the Combined Code
Throughout 2005, the group was in compliance with the relevant
provisions of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance,
except with regard to the following aspects:

The Code provision A.3.1 states that the board should identify in
the annual report each non-executive director it considers to be
independent. The board should state its reasons if it determines
that a director is independent notwithstanding the existence of
relationships or circumstances which may appear relevant to its
determination, including, amongst the seven stated reasons, if
the director has served on the board for more than nine years
from the date of their first election. Trevor Larman was first
appointed on 28 March 1994 and has therefore served for a term
of more than nine year’s. However the board considers that he
continues to act independently.

The Code provision A3.2 states that except for smaller
companies, at least half of the board, excluding the Chairman,
should comprise non-executive directors determined by the board
to be independent. The board considers that compliance should
have regard to the size of the group’s operations and believes
that the structure of the Chairman, two non-executive’s and three
executive directors is appropriate for the business. 

The Code provision B1.6 refers to directors service contracts and
compensation and states that ‘notice or contract periods should
be set at one year or less. The company complied with this rule
following the signing of new agreements with executive directors
on 11 October 2005 which provide for a notice period of twelve
months. Prior to this change, executive directors notice period in
the event of a change of control was reducing from two years to
one year by January 2006. New executive appointments to the
board will similarly be subject to Code compliant service contracts.

The Code provisions B2.1 and C3.1 state that the board should
establish both an audit and a remuneration committee of at least
three, or in the case of smaller companies, two members, who
should all be independent non-executive directors. The group
complied with this provision following the appointment of Dick
Peters who became a member of each of the remuneration, audit
and nomination committees.

The Code provision D.1.1 states that the senior independent
director should attend sufficient meetings with a range of major
shareholders to listen to their views in order to help develop a
balanced understanding of the issues and concerns of major
shareholders. Whilst the opportunities exist, such meetings do
not currently take place, however the executive directors are fully
aware of the issues and concerns of the major shareholders and
share these with the board twice a year following the
announcement of interim and final results and at other times 
as appropriate.

Going Concern
The group continues to place considerable emphasis on its
budgeting and forecasting procedures and each month produces 
a forecast of trading and cash flow for the accounting period.
Accordingly, the group continues to have in place all the
procedures and information appropriate to the going concern
assessment required by the Combined Code on Corporate
Governance. Having reviewed the group’s resources and a range
of likely trading out-turns, the directors believe that they have
reasonable grounds for stating that the group has adequate
resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable
future and therefore to continue to adopt the going concern
basis in preparing the financial statements.

This directors report has been approved by the board and signed
on its behalf by 

Geoff Duggan
Company Secretary
10 April 2006

Registered office
PO Box 1
Gorsey Lane
Coleshill
Birmingham
B46 1LW
Company registered in England and Wales No. 460129

38

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Remuneration Report

Composition and role of the remuneration committee
The board’s remuneration committee comprises the independent
non-executive directors and is Chaired by Tom Anderson. Trevor
Larman and Roger Dickens were members of the committee
throughout 2005. Dick Peters became a member of the
committee when he joined the board in December 2005. 

To recognise performance against agreed objectives, the
committee has put in place an annual bonus scheme for
executive directors similar to that applying to other senior
executives in the group. Annual bonuses for executive directors
are only paid on the achievement of demanding individual,
business and corporate objectives.

The committee makes recommendations to the board, within
formal terms of reference, on the policy and framework of
executive remuneration and its cost to the company. The
committee is also responsible for the implementation of
remuneration policy and determining specific remuneration
packages for each of the executive directors. It has access to
advice provided by the Group Chief Executive, Company Secretary
and external consultants. During 2005 the committee sought
information from a wide variety of freely available published
sources to assist in the formulation of the committee’s
recommendations. Similar information was sought in respect 
of retirement benefits and non-executive directors’ fees during
the year.

This report, which will be submitted to the forthcoming AGM for
approval, explains how the company has applied the principles 
of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance that relate to
directors’ remuneration during the period. No director is involved
in the determination of, or votes on any matter relating to, their
own remuneration.

Remuneration policy
Framework and policy on executive directors’ remuneration
The group’s remuneration policy is designed to provide
competitive reward for its executive directors and other senior
executives, taking into account the company’s performance, the
markets in which the group operates and pay and conditions
elsewhere in the group.

In constructing the remuneration packages, the committee aims
to achieve a balance between fixed and variable compensation
for each director. Accordingly, a significant proportion of the
remuneration package depends on the attainment of demanding
performance objectives. In determining the level of base salaries
and the annual performance bonus scheme, the committee takes
into consideration the potential maximum remuneration that
executives could receive. The committee reviews these packages
and varies individual elements when appropriate from year to year. 

Under the executive share option scheme (ESOS) the practice is
to make conditional awards up to a maximum of 200% of gross
earnings when deemed appropriate. This scheme is designed to
align the interests of executive directors and other senior
executives with the longer term interests of shareholders by
rewarding them for delivering increased shareholder value. 

The group does not currently operate a long term incentive plan. 

Executive directors also participate in a non-contributory final
salary pension plan, details of which are given on page 44.

The committee believes that these arrangements, which are
further explained below, are important in providing a potential
remuneration package that will attract, retain and continue to
motivate executive directors and other senior executives in a
marketplace that is challenging and competitive in both
commercial and human resource terms. It is intended that the
current remuneration policy, of which the ESOS element has 
been approved by shareholders, will continue for 2006 and
succeeding years. 

The total emoluments of the executive directors are disclosed on
page 41. 

Components of remuneration
Base salary
The committee seeks to establish a base salary for each executive
director and other senior executives determined by individual
performance and having regard to market salary levels for similar
positions in comparable companies by reference to independent
sources. Base salaries are reviewed annually. Base salary is the
only element of remuneration that is pensionable. 

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

39

Remuneration Report

Annual performance bonus
At the beginning of each year, the committee reviews the bonus
scheme to ensure that it remains competitive in the marketplace,
continues to incentivise the executive directors and other senior
executives and aligns their interests with those of shareholders.
The scheme focuses on annual objectives and links individual
performance with business targets. The financial targets are
calculated by reference to the extent to which the group’s profit
before taxation exceeds the planned target. The remuneration
committee establishes the objectives that must be attained each
financial year if a bonus is to be paid. If the performance target
is not achieved the bonus is not normally payable. However, the
remuneration committee has discretion to award part payment if
circumstances are considered appropriate. The committee takes
account of the relative success of the group’s performance for
which the executive directors are responsible and the extent to
which strategic objectives are being attained. A maximum bonus
of 150% of basic salary is payable for achievement of
performance related targets including over performance. The
performance related elements of remuneration for executive
directors and executive management are paid in March following
the completion of the annual audit. Details of the payments to
directors are included in the directors’ remuneration for the year
on page 41. 

Executive share option schemes (ESOS)
To the extent that performance conditions are satisfied, options
granted under the ESOS become exercisable three years after the
date of grant and remain so until the tenth anniversary of grant
in respect of the approved scheme and the seventh anniversary
of grant in respect of the unapproved scheme. Performance
conditions are based on the extent to which growth in the
group’s earnings per share (EPS growth) exceeds growth in the
Retail Prices Index (RPI growth) over a three-year performance
period. EPS is calculated as fully diluted earnings per share. The
committee believes that this method of calculating EPS provides
an objective, independent and verifiable measure of the group’s
performance. In respect of each grant of options under the
approved scheme, the committee has determined that, for the
option to be exercisable, EPS growth must exceed RPI growth by

3% pa or more over the three-year performance period. In
respect of each grant of options under the unapproved scheme,
the committee has determined that, for options up to one times
eligible earnings to be exercisable, EPS growth must exceed RPI
growth by 3% pa or more over the three-year performance period
and by 5% or more over the three-year performance period for
options granted of between one times and two times eligible
earnings. Options granted prior to 2004 under the ESOS
permitted the group’s EPS to be measured annually for a further
two years from the date of grant of the options, with the
performance conditions increasing proportionately. Having
reviewed market practice regarding the retesting of performance
measures, the committee removed this element in respect of all
option grants from January 2004. The committee continues to
believe that, in relation to the ESOS, EPS growth in excess of RPI
growth is the most appropriate measure for determining the
increase in value delivered to shareholders by the company’s
executive directors and other senior executives. The committee
reviews the appropriateness of the performance measure and the
specific targets set when considering each new grant of options.
During 2006, it will consider the impact on EPS of the change in
reporting under IFRS in order to determine whether EPS will
remain the most appropriate and consistent performance measure
for this scheme. In August 2005, options were granted to Tony
Brewer and Steve Wilson equal to 82% and 80% respectively of
their base salary and, at lower rates, to certain other senior
executives. Details of options granted to executive directors are
shown on page 43. It is the company’s intention that new shares
be issued, subject to institutional guidelines, to satisfy the
exercise of options granted under the ESOS.

Long term incentive scheme (LTIS)
The group does not currently operate a long term incentive plan. 

40

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Remuneration Report continued

5 Year Return Index for FTSE 250 Index as at 31 December 2005

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

x
e
d
n
I

n
r
u
t
e
R

31 December
2001

31 December
2002

31 December
2003

31 December
2004

Headlam Group plc

FTSE MID 250 
Ex Investment Trust

31 December
2005

Source: Thomson Financial

Performance graph
The above graph has been included to meet the requirements of Schedule 7a of the Companies Act 1985. It shows the group’s
performance for the five year period to 31 December 2005 measured by total shareholder return (‘TSR’), compared with the performance
of the FTSE 250 index also measured by TSR, which is defined as share price growth, plus re-invested dividends. The FTSE 250 index
has been chosen because it provides a basis for comparison against companies in a relevant broad based equity index in which the
group is a constituent member.

Pension
Executive directors also participate in a non-contributory, final
salary pension plan, details of which are given on page 44.

Other employment benefits
In common with other senior management, executive directors
are entitled to a range of benefits, including a company car, life
assurance and private medical insurance. They are also eligible to
participate in the company’s Inland Revenue-approved sharesave
scheme which is open to all eligible employees on the same
basis, providing a long-term savings and investment opportunity. 

Service contracts
It is the company’s policy for the notice period in executive
directors’ service contracts not to exceed one year. The executive
directors’ service contracts have no fixed term but provide that
either the director or the company may terminate the
employment by giving one year’s written notice and that the
company may pay compensation in lieu of notice. Executive
directors’ service contracts were renewed in October 2005 to
reflect a notice period of one year.

 
Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

41

Remuneration Report continued

External appointments of executive directors
The board believes that experience of other companies’ practices
and challenges is valuable both for the personal development of
its executive directors and for the company. It is therefore the
company’s policy to allow each executive director to accept one
non-executive directorship of another company, although the
board retains the discretion to vary this policy. Fees received in
respect of external appointments are retained by the individual
director. Fees received in 2005 in respect of non-executive
appointments by Graham Waldron and Steve Wilson were £50,000
and £44,000 respectively.

Non-executive directors
Non-executive directors including the Chairman do not hold
service contracts. Their appointment is subject to the articles of
association and the dates they joined the board are shown on
page 24. Their fees are approved by the board. Upon the
recommendation of the board, the fees payable to Trevor Larman
as Chairman were agreed by the board as £75,000 per annum.

Following the examination of the role of non-executive directors
in the Higgs Report and the subsequent changes to the
Combined Code, in 2005 the board conducted a review of non-
executive directors’ fees (excluding fees paid to the chairman).
This took into account not only the need to attract individuals 
of the right calibre and experience, but also their increased
responsibilities and time commitment, as envisaged in the new
Code, and the fees paid by other companies. The board received
survey and other information from a variety of freely available
sources. As a result of this review, their annual fees were increased
from £30,000 to £31,500, with an additional £5,000 being paid 
to the respective Chairmen of the audit and remuneration
committees. The non-executive directors, including the Chairman,
do not participate in any of the company’s share schemes,
incentive plans or pension schemes. The remuneration report from
page 38 to page 41 up to this statement, with the exception of
the performance graph on page 40, has not been audited. From
this point until the end of the report on page 44 the disclosures
have been audited by the company’s auditors, KPMG.

Directors’ emoluments
Details of directors’ emoluments for the year ended 31 December 2005 are set out below.

Executive
Tony Brewer 
Steve Wilson 
Graham Waldron 

Non-executive
Trevor Larman 
Tom Anderson 
Roger Dickens 
Dick Peters (iii)

Salary and fees
2004
£000

2005
£000

425
310
80

70
35
35
3

375 
285 
75 

65 
30 
27 
— 

958

857 

Benefits

Performance related pay

Total

2005
£000

2004
£000

27
31
21

—
—
—
—

79

26 
29 
17 

— 
— 
— 
—

72 

2005
£000

465
350
—

—
—
—
—

2004
£000

562 
427 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 

2005
£000

917
691
101

70
35
35
3

2004
£000

963
741
92

65
30
27
—

815

989 

1,852

1,918

Benefits include all taxable benefits arising from employment by the company, mainly the provision of a company car.
Pensions and gains made by executive directors in respect of share options are excluded from the table above. The aggregate amount of gains made by
executive directors on the exercise of share options was £363,750 (2004: £998,000).

42

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Remuneration Report continued

Directors’ Interests in Shares
The following table and the tables on page 43 show the beneficial interests of the directors who held office at the end of the year in
the ordinary shares of the company and the interests of the executive directors who served during the year in the company’s share
schemes:

Executive Directors
Graham Waldron 
Tony Brewer 
Steve Wilson 
Non-executive Directors
Trevor Larman 
Tom Anderson 

Shareholdings at
31 December 2005 

Shareholdings at
31 December 2004

471,667
443,874
336,433

6,944
4,000

471,667
443,874
211,433

6,944
4,000

As at 5 January 2006, the beneficial shareholding of Graham Waldron had increased by 4,796 shares following the exercise of SAYE
options on their normal maturity date.

Directors’ interest in share option schemes
Executive schemes
During the year options held under the 1996 and 1998 unapproved schemes were exercised, details of which are shown under gains on
share options below.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

43

Remuneration Report continued

Details of executive options held by executive directors are set out below, a description of which is given on page 39.

Options
held at
1 January
2005

25,000
—
—
8,337

25,000
100,000
—
—
8,337

Options
granted
during 
the year

—
342,858
7,142
—

—
—
242,858
7,142
—

Options
exercised
during
the year

Options
held at
31 December
2005

Exercise
price
(pence)

Date from
which
exercisable

Expiry 
date

25,000(b)
—
—
—

25,000(a)
100,000(c)
—
—
—

—
342,858
7,142
8,337

—
—
242,858
7,142
8,337

225.50
420.00
420.00
197.00

225.50
128.00
420.00
420.00
197.00

Dec 2001
Aug 2008
Aug 2008
Jan 2008

Dec 2001
Jan 2004
Aug 2008
Aug 2008
Jan 2008

Dec 2005
Aug 2012
Aug 2015
Jun 2008

Dec 2005
Jan 2008
Aug 2012
Aug 2015
Jun 2008

4,796

—

—

4,796

197.00

Jan 2006

Jun 2006

Tony Brewer
1996 USOS(i)
1998 USOS (ii)
1998 ESOS(iii)
Sharesave(iv)
Steve Wilson
1996 USOS(i)
1998 USOS (ii)
1998 USOS(ii)
1998 ESOS(iii)
Sharesave(iv)
Graham Waldron
Sharesave(iv)

(i) Headlam Group Unapproved Executive share option scheme 1996 (1996 USOS)
Options were granted to executives under the terms of the 1996 USOS on 14 April 1998. Details of the operation of the scheme are provided on page 39.

(ii) Headlam Group Unapproved Executive share option scheme 1998 (1998 USOS)
Options were granted to executives under the terms of the 1998 USOS on 22 August 2005. Details of the operation of the scheme are provided on page 39.

(iii) Headlam Group Approved Executive share option scheme 1998 (1998 ESOS)
Options were granted to executives under the terms of the 1998 ESOS on 22 August 2005 Details of the operation of the scheme are provided on page 39.

(iv) Headlam Group Sharesave scheme 2002 (Sharesave)
The company operates an Inland Revenue-approved all-employee savings-related share option scheme in the UK. The scheme is designed to provide a long-term
savings and investment opportunity for employees and is described on page 40.

(v) Exercise of share options
The market prices of shares on the dates options were exercised were:
(a) 3 May 2005 at 398.00 pence
(b) 6 December 2005 at 400.00 pence
(c) 16 December 2005 at 405.00 pence

The closing price of a Headlam Group plc ordinary share on the last trading day of 2005 (30 December) was 432.00 pence. The range during the year was 464.25
pence (high) and 385.00 pence (low).

44

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Remuneration Report continued

Pension Benefits
Tony Brewer and Stephen Wilson participate in the group’s defined benefit (final salary) pension scheme which provides benefits at a
normal retirement age of sixty based upon pensionable service and basic pay, bonus being excluded. The maximum pension payable
under the scheme is two-thirds of final pensionable pay subject to Inland Revenue limits. There are four times earnings lump sum
death-in-service benefits and pension provisions for members’ dependents. During 2006, the company will be reviewing its pension
policy as a result of the 2004 Pensions Act, the 2004 Finance Act and the result of the triennial valuation at the end of March 2005.

Details of pensions earned by the executive directors for the year ended 31 December 2005 are shown below

Increase in
accrued pension 
during the year 
£pa 
2,578
3,274

Transfer value 
of increase 
£ 
31,784
51,478

Accumulated
accrued pension 
at 31 December
2005 
£pa 
35,403
43,741

Change in
accrued pension
over the year 
£pa 
3,565
4,491

Accumulated
accrued pension 
at 31 December
2004
£pa
31,838
39,250

Tony Brewer 
Steve Wilson 

The increase in accrued pension during the year excludes any increase due to inflation of the accumulated accrued pension at the start 
of the year. 

The change in accrued pension over the year includes any increase due to inflation of the accumulated accrued pension at the start of
the year.

Tony Brewer 
Steve Wilson 

Transfer value of 
accrued pension at 
31 December transfer
2005 
£ 
438,955
689,336

Change in 
value 
over the year 
£pa 
90,277
145,325

Transfer value of
accrued pension at
31 December
2004
£
348,678
544,011

In addition to salary, Graham Waldron benefits from a payment of £7,000 (2004: £26,000) which is made directly to a personal
pension arrangement. The final contribution to these pension arrangements was made on 14 April 2005 on Graham Waldron reaching
his 75th birthday. 

On 23 March 2006 the normal retirement date of certain senior executives was moved from sixty to fifty five, including the two
executive directors participating in the scheme.

This report on remuneration has been approved by the board and signed on its behalf by 

Geoff Duggan
Company Secretary
10 April 2006

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

45

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 
in respect of the Annual Report and the financial statements 

The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and
the group and parent financial statements in accordance with
applicable law and regulations.  

• state whether they have been prepared in accordance with

IFRS as adopted by the EU.

Company law requires the directors to prepare group and parent
company financial statements for each financial year. Under that
law the directors are required to prepare the group financial
statements in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU and
have elected to prepare the parent company financial statements
on the same basis.  

The group and parent company financial statements are required
by law and IFRS as adopted by the EU to present fairly the
financial position of the group and the parent company and the
performance for that period; the Companies Act 1985 provides in
relation to such financial statements that references in the
relevant part of that Act to financial statements giving a true
and fair view are references to their achieving a fair presentation.  
In preparing each of the group and parent company financial
statements, the directors are required to:  

• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them

consistently.

• make judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent.

• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the group and the
parent company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting
records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the
financial position of the parent company and enable them to
ensure that its financial statements comply with the Companies
Act 1985. They have a general responsibility for taking such
steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets 
of the group and to prevent and detect fraud and other
irregularities.  

Under applicable law and regulations, the directors are also
responsible for preparing a Directors’ Report, Directors’
Remuneration Report and the Corporate Governance Statement
that comply with that law and those regulations.

The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of
the corporate and financial information included on the company’s
website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and
dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation
in other jurisdictions.

46

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of Headlam Group plc

We have audited the group and parent company financial
statements (the ‘‘financial statements’’) of Headlam Group plc 
for the year ended 31 December 2005 which comprise the
Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated and Parent
Company Balance Sheets, the Consolidated and Parent Company
Cash Flow Statement, the Consolidated and Parent Company
Statements of Recognised Income and Expense and the related
notes. These financial statements have been prepared under the
accounting policies set out therein. We have also audited the
information in the Directors’ Remuneration Report that is
described as having been audited. 

This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a 
body, in accordance with section 235 of the Companies Act 
1985. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might
state to the company’s members those matters we are required 
to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or
assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and 
the company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this 
report, or for the opinions we have formed. 

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors 
The directors’ responsibilities for preparing the Annual Report,
the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the financial statements
in accordance with applicable law and International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU are set out in
the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities on page 45. 

Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and the
part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited in
accordance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements and
International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). 

We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial
statements give a true and fair view and whether the financial
statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to
be audited have been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 1985 and as regards the financial statements,
Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. We also report to you if, in our
opinion, the Directors’ Report is not consistent with the financial
statements, if the company has not kept proper accounting records,
if we have not received all the information and explanations we
require for our audit, or if information specified by law regarding
directors’ remuneration and other transactions is not disclosed. 

We review whether the Corporate Governance Statement reflects
the company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the 2003
FRC Combined Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules
of the Financial Services Authority, and we report if it does not.
We are not required to consider whether the board’s statements
on internal control cover all risks and controls, or form an
opinion on the effectiveness of the group’s corporate governance
procedures or its risk and control procedures.

We read other information contained in the Annual Report and
consider whether it is consistent with the audited financial
statements. We consider the implications for our report if we
become aware of any apparent misstatements or material
inconsistencies with the financial statements. Our responsibilities
do not extend to any other information.

Basis of audit opinion 
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) issued by the Auditing
Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis,
of evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration
Report to be audited. It also includes an assessment of the
significant estimates and judgments made by the directors in the
preparation of the financial statements, and of whether the
accounting policies are appropriate to the group’s and company’s
circumstances, consistently applied and adequately disclosed. 

We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the
information and explanations which we considered necessary in
order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable
assurance that the financial statements and the part of the
Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are free from material
misstatement, whether caused by fraud or other irregularity or
error. In forming our opinion we also evaluated the overall adequacy
of the presentation of information in the financial statements
and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited. 

Opinion
In our opinion: 
• the group financial statements give a true and fair view, in

accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU, of the state of the
group’s affairs as at 31 December 2005 and of its profit for the
year then ended; 

• the parent company financial statements give a true and fair

view, in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU as applied
in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 1985,
of the state of the parent company’s affairs as a 31 December
2005; and

• the financial statements and the part of the Directors’
Remuneration Report to be audited have been properly
prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and, as
regards the financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. 

KPMG Audit Plc
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditor

2 Cornwall Street
Birmingham
B3 2DL

10 April 2006

Consolidated Income Statement
for the year ended 31 December 2005

Revenue
Cost of sales

Gross profit

Distribution expenses
Administrative expenses

Operating profit

Financial income
Financial expenses

Net financing costs

Profit before tax
Taxation

Profit for the year

Dividend per share

Earnings per share

Basic

Diluted

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

47

Note

2005
£000

2004
£000

2

2

6
6

3
7

486,635
(336,570)

464,789
(323,924)

150,065

140,865

(77,507)
(31,060)

(70, 592)
(31,349)

41,498

38,924

3,893
(4,551)

3,300
(3,740)

(658)

(440)

40,840
(12,352)

38,484
(11,738)

28,488

26,746

22

16.25p

13.85p

9

9

33.1p

32.8p

31.3p

31.0p

48 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Statements of Recognised Income and Expense
for year ended 31 December 2005

Foreign exchange translation differences

arising on translation of overseas operations
Recycling of cash flow hedging reserve balance
Actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit 

pension plans

Tax recognised on income and expenses 

recognised directly in equity

Note

Group

Company

2005
£000

(321)
13

2004
£000

(256)
–

2005
£000

2004
£000

–
–

(1,759)
–

(2,571)

(3,748)

(2,571)

(3,748)

910

1,143

910

1,143

Net income recognised directly in equity

(1,969)

(2,861)

(1,661)

(4,364)

Profit for the year

28,488

26,746

39,352

20,965

Total recognised income and expense 

22

26,519

23,885

37,691

16,601

Effect of change in accounting policy
Effect of adoption of IAS 32 and 39, net of tax,  
on 1 January 2005 (with 2004 not restated) on:
cash flow hedge reserve

13

13

–

–

–

–

–

–

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

49

Note

10
12
11
13

14
15

16

17

18
18

19
20

18

20
13

Group

Company

2005
£000

74,640
–
13,210
8,199

2004
£000

71,754
–
14,046
8,167

2005
£000

58,665
94,835
–
6,629

2004
£000

58,300
94,710
–
5,704

96,049

93,967

160,129

158,714

91,160
84,275
–
36,193

79,692
85,550
–
37,747

211,628
3,471

202,989
203

–
2,320
23,272
31,265

56,857
3,471

–
2,678
25,163
5,473

33,314
203

311,148

297,159

220,457

192,231

–
(471)
–
(141,529)
(1,080)
(11,139)

(279)
(1,124)
–
(142,028)
(722)
(11,053)

–
(471)
(855)
(5,532)
(1,080)
(3,500)

–
(430)
–
(5,331)
(722)
(4,841)

(154,219)

(155,206)

(11,438)

(11,324)

(267)
–
(19,432)
(1,403)

(738)
–
(17,643)
(1,212)

(267)
(49,732)
(19,146)
(1,616)

(738)
(48,930)
(17,192)
(96)

(21,102)

(19,593)

(70,761)

(66,956)

(175,321)

(174,799)

(82,199)

(78,280)

135,827

122,360

138,258

113,951

Balance Sheets 
at 31 December 2005

Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Investments in subsidiary undertakings
Intangible assets
Deferred tax assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings
Cash and cash equivalents

Non-current assets classified as held for sale

Total assets

Current liabilities
Bank overdraft
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Amounts due to subsidiary undertakings
Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
Income tax payable

Non-current liabilities
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Amounts due to subsidiary undertakings
Employee benefits
Deferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

50 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Balance Sheets continued
at 31 December 2005

Equity attributable to equity holders 

of the parent
Share capital
Share premium
Special reserve
Translation reserves
Retained earnings

Total equity

Note

22
22
22
22
22

Group

Company

2005
£000

2004
£000

2005
£000

2004
£000

4,326
52,280
–
(577)
79,798

4,306
51,731
–
(256)
66,579

4,326
52,280
20,578
(1,759)
62,833

4,306
51,731
20,578
(1,759)
39,095

135,827

122,360

138,258

113,951

These financial statements were approved by the board of directors on 10 April 2006 and were signed on its behalf by:

Tony Brewer
Director

Stephen Wilson
Director

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

51

Cash Flow Statements
for year ended 31 December 2005

Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before tax for the year
Adjustments for:
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
Financial income
Financial expense
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
Equity settled share-based payment expenses

Operating profit before changes 

in working capital and provisions
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other
receivables
Increase in inventories
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

Cash generated from the operations
Interest paid
Tax (paid)/received
Additional contributions to defined benefit pension plan

Note

Group

2005
£000

2004
£000

40,840

38,484

5,133
(3,893)
4,551
(228)
196

4,313
(3,300)
3,740
11
57

46,599

43,305

1,699
(11,335)
(1,085)

35,878
(1,456)
(10,994)
(722)

(8,118)
(3,753)
14,588

46,022
(1,093)
(12,082)
–

Company

2005
£000

135

1,249
(1,280)
2,035
(206)
71

2,004

1,801
–
832

4,637
(1,518)
843
(722)

2004
£000

1,558

913
(759)
597
(1)
2

2,310

3,560
–
573

6,443
(303)
(725)
–

5,415

Net cash from operating activities

22,706

32,847

3,240

Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Interest received
Dividends received
Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

598
1,335
–
(426)
(10,965)

282
1,055
–
(3,779)
(14,374)

445
1,154
39,910
–
(5,121)

152
949
18,345
(4,501)
(12,339)

Net cash from investing activities

(9,458)

(16,816)

36,388

2,606

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the issue of share capital
Repayment of borrowings
Payment of finance lease liabilities
Dividends paid 

570
(662)
(438)
(13,976)

2,763
(1,121)
(498)
(11,795)

570
–
(430)
(13,976)

2,763
–
(393)
(11,795)

Net cash from financing activities

(14,506)

(10,651)

(13,836)

(9,425)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held

(1,258)
37,468
(17)

5,380
32,119
(31)

25,792
5,473
–

(1,404)
6,877

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

25

36,193

37,468

31,265

5,473

52

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements

1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Headlam Group Plc (the “company”) is a company incorporated in
the UK.

The group financial statements consolidate those of the company
and its subsidiaries which together are referred to as the “group”.
The parent company’s financial statements present information
about the company as a separate entity and not about its group.

Both the parent company’s financial statements and the group’s
financial statements have been prepared and approved by the
directors in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as adopted by the EU (“IFRS”). On publishing the
parent company financial statements here together with the
group financial statements, the company is taking advantage of
the exemption in s230 of the Companies Act 1985 not to present
its individual income statement and related notes that form a
part of these approved financial statements.

The accounting policies set out below have, unless otherwise
stated, been applied consistently to all periods presented in
these consolidated financial statements and in preparing an
opening IFRS balance sheet at 1 January 2004 for the purposes
of the transition to IFRS. The principal exception is that, as more
fully explained below, financial instruments accounting is
determined on different bases in 2005 and 2004 due to the
transitional provisions of IAS 32 and IAS 39.

Judgements made by the directors, in the application of these
accounting policies that have significant effect on the financial
statements and estimates with a significant risk of material
adjustment in the next year are discussed in note 31.

Transition to IFRS
Both the company and the group are preparing their financial
statements in accordance with IFRS for the first time and
consequently both have applied IFRS 1. An explanation of how
the transition to IFRS has affected the reported financial
performance of the group and the financial position and cash
flows of the company and group is provided in note 32.

In addition to exempting companies from the requirement to
restate comparatives for IAS 32 and IAS 39, IFRS 1 grants certain
exemptions from the full requirements of IFRS in the transition
period. The following exemptions have been taken in these
financial statements:

• Business combinations – Business combinations that took
place prior to 1 January 2004 have not been restated.

• The company and the group have elected to restate the

carrying value of freehold and long leasehold properties as at
1 January 2004 to historical cost. Previously, properties were
stated at a combination of historical cost and market value.

• Employee benefits – All cumulative actuarial gains and losses
on defined benefit plans have been recognised in equity at 
1 January 2004.

• Cumulative translation differences – Cumulative translation

differences for all foreign operations have been set to zero at
1 January 2004. Any gains and losses arising in the income
statement on the subsequent disposal of an overseas
subsidiary undertaking will only include those exchange gains
or losses arising from the date of transition.

• Share based payments – IFRS 2 – Share based payments, has
been applied only to grants of equity settled share based
payments made after 7 November 2002 which had not vested
by 1 January 2005.

Following initial adoption, the group has decided not to apply
the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39. Consequently, all
movements in the fair value of the hedge are recognised
immediately in the income statement, within net financing costs.

Measurement convention
The company and group financial statements are prepared on the
historical cost basis except for derivative financial instruments
classified as fair value through the income statement. Non-
current assets held for sale are stated at the lower of previous
carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

53

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the group. Control exists
when the group has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern
the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain
benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting
rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are taken into
account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in
the consolidated financial statements from the date that control
commences until the date that control ceases.

Foreign currency
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the foreign
exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the
balance sheet date are translated at the foreign exchange rate
ruling at that date or the contracted date. Foreign exchange
differences arising on translation are recognised in the income
statement. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured
in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated
using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. 

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill
and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are
translated at foreign exchange rates ruling at the balance sheet
date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are
translated at an average rate for the period where this rate
approximates to the foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates 
of the transactions.

Exchange differences arising from this translation of foreign
operations are taken directly to the translation reserve. They are
released into the income statement upon disposal.

The group has taken advantage of relief available in IFRS 1 to
deem the cumulative translation differences for all foreign
operations to be zero at the date of transition to IFRS on 
1 January 2004.

Classification of financial instruments issued by the group
Following the adoption of IAS 32, financial instruments issued by
the group are treated as equity, i.e. forming part of shareholders’
funds, only to the extent that they meet the following two
conditions: 

(a)they include no contractual obligations upon the company, or
group as the case may be, to deliver cash or other financial
assets or to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities
with another party under conditions that are potentially
unfavourable to the company or group; and 

(b)where the instrument will or may be settled in the company’s
own equity instruments, it is either a non-derivative that
includes no obligation to deliver a variable number of the
company’s own equity instruments or is a derivative that will
be settled by the company exchanging a fixed amount of cash
or other financial assets for a fixed number of its own equity
instruments.

To the extent that this definition is not met, the proceeds of
issue are classified as a financial liability. Where the instrument
so classified takes the legal form of the company’s own shares,
the amounts presented in these financial statements for called 
up share capital and share premium account exclude amounts in
relation to those shares. 

Finance payments associated with financial liabilities are dealt
with as part of financial expenses. Finance payments associated
with financial instruments that are classified in equity are
dividends and are recorded directly in equity.

Investments in debt and equity securities
Investments in subsidiaries are carried at cost less impairment.

Where the consideration for the acquisition of a subsidiary
undertaking includes shares in the company to which the
provisions of Section 131 of the Companies Act 1985 apply, cost
represents the nominal value of shares issued, together with the
fair value of any additional consideration given and costs. In the
consolidated financial statements, the excess of the fair value of
the consideration of shares issued over the nominal value is
credited to the special reserve.

54

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED
Derivative financial instruments and hedging
Derivative financial instruments
Derivative transactions relate to forward foreign currency
contracts used to hedge the group’s exposure to currency risks
arising from selling and buying activities. In accordance with its
treasury policy, the group does not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading purposes. However, derivatives
that do not qualify for hedge accounting are accounted for as
trading instruments.

Derivative financial instruments are recognised at fair value. 
The gain or loss on remeasurement to fair value is recognised
immediately in the income statement. However, where derivatives
qualify for hedge accounting, recognition of any resultant gain or
loss depends on the nature of the item being hedged as
described below.

The fair value of forward exchange contracts is their quoted
market price at the balance sheet date, being the present value
of the quoted forward price.

Cash flow hedges
On initial adoption of IAS 39, where a derivative financial
instrument was designated as a hedge of the variability in cash
flows of a recognised asset or liability, or a highly probable forecast
transaction, the effective part of any cumulative gain or loss on
the derivative financial instrument since the inception of the hedge
relationship was recognised directly in the hedging reserve. 

The associated cumulative gain or loss is removed from equity
and recognised in the income statement in the same period or
periods during which the hedged forecast transaction affects
profit or loss.

Effect on the balance sheets at 1 January 2005

Trade and other payables
Interest payable

Cash flow hedging reserve

Following initial adoption, the group has decided not to apply
the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39. Consequently, all
movements in the fair value of the hedge are recognised
immediately in the income statement, within net financing costs.

Effect of first time adoption of IAS 32 and IAS 39 on 
1 January 2005
The group has taken advantage of the transitional arrangements
of IFRS 1 not to restate corresponding amounts in accordance
with IAS 32 and IAS 39. Instead the following policies were
applied in respect of financial instruments issued by the group,
investments in debt and equity securities, derivative financial
instruments and hedging:

In the comparative period, other than the following exceptions,
all financial assets and financial liabilities were carried at cost,
amortised as appropriate, less, in the case of financial assets,
provision for any permanent diminution in value. Gains and
losses on forward foreign exchange contracts treated as hedging
instruments were not recognised in the income statement. On
recognition of the hedged transaction the unrecognised gains
and losses arising on the instrument were recognised, either in
the income statement or combined into the carrying value of the
associated asset or liability.

The following adjustments necessary to implement the revised
policy have been made as at 1 January 2005 with the net
adjustment to net assets, after tax, taken through the 2005
statement of recognised income and expense. Corresponding
amounts for 2004 are presented and disclosed in accordance with
the requirements of the Companies Act 1985, SSAP 20 and FRS 4,
as applicable in 2004. The main differences between the 2004
and 2005 bases of accounting are shown and described below:

Group
£000

Company
£000

(13)

13

–

–

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

55

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

The nature of the main effects upon the balance sheets at 
1 January 2005 and upon the 2005 income statement, statements
of recognised income and expense and cash flow statements are
as follows:

• In 2005 hedging instruments and hedged items are accounted
for separately in the balance sheet. Gains and losses in both
are included in profit for the year when they arise, i.e. fair
value hedges, or when the hedged transaction occurs having
first recorded those on the hedging instrument in equity, i.e.
cash flow hedges, to the extent effective. In 2004 hedging
instruments were not recognised and hedged items were held
at cost, amortised as appropriate, without any adjustment in
respect of the hedged risk. On 1 January 2005, the hedged
items and hedging instruments are brought separately on to
the balance sheet in accordance with the 2005 policy. The
cash flow statements are unaffected by this change in
accounting policy.

The main effects on the primary statements in the comparative
year, had IAS 32 and IAS 39 been adopted, would have been
similar to those stated above.

Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.

Where parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have
different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items of
property, plant and equipment.

Leases in which the company and the group assume substantially
all the risks and rewards of ownership of the leased asset are
classified as finance leases. Where land and buildings are held
under finance leases the accounting treatment of the land is
considered separately from that of the buildings. Leased assets
acquired by way of finance lease are stated at an amount equal
to the lower of their fair value and the present value of the
minimum lease payments at inception of the lease, less
accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Lease payments
are accounted for as described below.

Depreciation is charged to the income statement on a straight-
line basis over their estimated useful lives. Land is not
depreciated. The annual rates applicable are:

Freehold and long leasehold properties – 2% 
Short leasehold properties
Motor vehicles
Office and computer equipment
Warehouse and production equipment – 10% - 20%

– period of lease
– 25%
– 10% - 33.3%

Intangible assets and goodwill
Subject to the transitional relief in IFRS 1, all business
combinations are accounted for by applying the purchase
method. Goodwill represents amounts arising on acquisition 
of subsidiaries. In respect of business acquisitions that have
occurred since 1 January 2004, goodwill represents the difference
between the cost of the acquisition and the fair value of the net
identifiable assets acquired. Identifiable intangibles are those
which can be sold separately or which arise from legal rights
regardless of whether those rights are separable.

Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment
losses. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units and is not
amortised but is tested annually for impairment. In respect of
associates, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the
carrying amount of the investment in the associate.

In respect of acquisitions prior to 1 January 2004, goodwill is
included on the basis of its deemed cost, which represents the
amount recorded under UK GAAP which was broadly comparable
save that only separable intangibles were recognised and
goodwill was amortised. On transition, certain items recognised
as other intangibles under IFRS, but not all such items, have
been separately accounted for with appropriate adjustments
against goodwill and amortisation of goodwill has ceased as
required by IFRS 1. 

56

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED
Intangible assets and goodwill –continued
Goodwill relating to acquisitions made prior to 1 January 1998,
and written off to reserves under UK GAAP, will not be charged 
to the consolidated income statement on subsequent disposal 
or termination of the acquired business.

Negative goodwill arising on an acquisition is recognised in the
income statement

Expenditure on research activities is recognised in the income
statement as an expense as incurred.

Expenditure on development activities is capitalised if the product
or process is technically and commercially feasible and the group
has sufficient resources to complete development. The expenditure
capitalised includes the cost of materials, direct labour and an
appropriate proportion of overheads. Other development
expenditure is recognised in the income statement as an expense
as incurred. Capitalised development expenditure is stated at cost
less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.

Other intangible assets that are acquired by the group are stated
at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. 
Amortisation is charged to the income statement on a straight-
line basis over the estimated useful lives of intangible assets
unless such lives are indefinite. Intangible assets with an
indefinite useful life and goodwill are systematically tested for
impairment at each balance sheet date. Other intangible assets
are amortised from the date they are available for use. The
estimated useful lives are as follows:

Customer lists

24 months

Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables are stated at their nominal amount,
discounted if material, less impairment losses.

Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable
value. Cost is based on the first-in first-out principle and
includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and
bringing them to their existing location and condition. Net
realisable value represents the estimated selling price less all
estimated costs of completion and costs to be incurred in
marketing, selling and distribution. 

Inventory provisions are determined by reference to each
individual product and are calculated by assessing the age,
condition and quantity of each individual product.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call
deposits. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form
an integral part of cash management of both the company and
group are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents
for the purpose only of the statement of cash flows.

Impairment
The carrying amounts of the group’s assets other than inventories
and deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each balance sheet date
to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any
such indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated.

For goodwill, assets that have an indefinite useful life and
intangible assets that are not yet available for use, the
recoverable amount is estimated at each balance sheet date.

An impairment loss is recognised whenever the carrying amount
of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable
amount. Impairment losses are recognised in the income
statement.

Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating units
are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill
allocated to cash-generating units and then to reduce the
carrying amount of the other assets in the unit on a pro rata
basis. A cash generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of
assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent
of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets.

Goodwill, assets that have an indefinite useful life and intangible
assets that are not yet available for use were tested for
impairment as at 1 January 2004, the date of transition to IFRS,
even through no indication of impairment existed.

When a decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale 
financial asset has been recognised directly in equity and there 
is objective evidence that the asset is impaired, the cumulative
loss that had been recognised directly in equity is recognised 
in profit or loss even though the financial asset has not been
derecognised. The amount of the cumulative loss that is
recognised in profit or loss is the difference between the
acquisition cost and current fair value, less any impairment loss
on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

57

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Calculation of recoverable amount
The recoverable amount of the group’s investments in held-to-
maturity securities and receivables carried at amortised cost is
calculated as the present value of estimated future cash flows,
discounted at the original effective interest rate, i.e., the
effective interest rate computed at initial recognition of these
financial assets. Receivables with a short duration are not
discounted.

The recoverable amount of other assets is the greater of their net
selling price and value in use. In assessing value in use, the
estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value
using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to
the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely
independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined
for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

Reversals of impairment
An impairment loss in respect of a held-to-maturity security or
receivable carried at amortised cost is reversed if the subsequent
increase in recoverable amount can be related objectively to an
event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised.

An impairment loss in respect of an investment in an equity
instrument classified as available for sale is not reversed through
profit or loss. If the fair value of a debt instrument classified as
available-for-sale increases and the increase can be objectively
related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was
recognised in profit or loss, the impairment loss is reversed
through profit or loss.

An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. 

In respect of other assets, an impairment loss is reversed when
there is an indication that the impairment loss may no longer
exist and there has been a change in the estimates used to
determine the recoverable amount.

An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s
carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would
have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no
impairment loss had been recognised.

Interest-bearing borrowings
Interest-bearing borrowings are recognised initially at fair value
less attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial
recognition, interest-bearing borrowings are stated at amortised
cost with any difference between cost and redemption value
being recognised in the income statement over the period of the
borrowings on an effective interest basis.

Employee benefits
The company and the group operate both defined benefit and
defined contribution plans, the assets of which are held in
independent trustee administered funds. The pension cost is
assessed in accordance with the advice of a qualified actuary.

Defined contribution plans
Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension
plans are recognised as an expense in the income statement 
as incurred.

Defined benefit plans
The group’s net obligation in respect of defined benefit pension
plans is calculated by estimating the amount of future benefit
that employees have earned in return for their service in the
current and prior periods; that benefit is discounted to determine
its present value, and the fair value of any plan assets, at bid
price, is deducted. The liability discount rate is the yield at the
balance sheet date using AA rated corporate bonds that have
maturity dates approximating to the terms of the group’s
obligations. The calculation is performed by a qualified actuary
using the projected unit credit method.

When the benefits of a plan are improved, the portion of the
increased benefit relating to past service by employees is
recognised as an expense in the income statement on a straight-
line basis over the average period until the benefits become
vested. To the extent that the benefits vest immediately, the
expense is recognised immediately in the income statement.

All actuarial gains and losses as at 1 January 2004, the date of
transition to IFRS, were recognised. In respect of actuarial gains
and losses that arise subsequent to 1 January 2004, the group
recognises them in the period they occur directly into equity
through the statement of recognised income and expense.

58

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED
Defined benefit plans – continued
Where the calculation results in a benefit to the group, the asset
recognised is limited to the present value of any future refunds
from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.

The group operates a group wide defined benefit pension plan.
As there is no contractual agreement or stated group policy for
charging the net defined benefit cost of the plan to participating
entities, the net defined benefit cost of the pension plan is
recognised fully by the sponsoring employer, which is Headlam
Group plc. The company then recognises a cost equal to its
contribution payable for the period. 

Share-based payment transactions
The company and group operate various equity settled share
option schemes under the approved and unapproved executive
schemes and savings related schemes.

Executive share option schemes – the option price may not be
less than the mid market value of the group’s shares at the time
when the options were granted or the nominal value.

Approved
These share options are subject to the movement of the group’s
earnings per share exceeding that of the General Index of Retail
Prices, all items, over the relevant period.

Unapproved
These share options are subject to the movement of the group
earnings per share exceeding that of the General Index of Retail
Prices, all items, by 2% per annum and 3% per annum over the
relevant period.

The performance is assessed by reference to the group’s
published results.

The fair value of options granted is recognised as an employee
expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is
measured at grant date and spread over the period during which
the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options.
The fair value of the options granted is measured using an option
valuation model, taking into account the terms and conditions
upon which the options were granted. The amount recognised as
an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share
options that vest except where forfeiture is due only to share
prices not achieving the threshold for vesting. 

When options are granted to employees of subsidiaries of the
company, the fair value of options granted is recognised as an
employee expense in the financial statements of the subsidiary
undertaking together with the capital contribution received. In
the financial statements of the company, the options granted are
recognised as an investment in subsidiary undertakings with a
corresponding increase in equity.

Revenue
Revenue from the sale of goods is measured at the fair value of
the consideration, net of trade discounts. Revenue from the sale
of goods is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of
ownership of the goods are transferred to the buyer, the amount
of revenue can be reliably measured and it is probable that the
economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to
the group.

Operating lease payments
Payments made under operating leases are recognised in the
income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the
lease. Lease incentives received are recognised in the income
statement as an integral part of the total lease expense.

Finance lease payments
Minimum lease payments are apportioned between the finance
charge and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance
charge is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to
produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining
balance of the liability.

Net financing costs
Net financing costs comprise interest payable, finance charges on
shares classified as liabilities, finance leases, interest receivable on
funds invested, foreign exchange gains and losses and gains and
losses on hedging instruments as outlined in the accounting
policy relating to derivative financial instruments and hedging
described above.

Interest income and interest payable is recognised in the income
statement as it accrues, using the effective interest method.
Dividend income is recognised in the income statement on the
date the entity’s right to receive payments is established.

The expected return on assets of funded defined benefits pension
plans, less administration expenses of pension plans are
recognised in financial income. The interest accruing on defined
benefit pension plan liabilities are recognised in financial expenses.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

59

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Taxation
Tax on the profit or loss for the year comprises current and
deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the income statement except to
the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity,
in which case it is recognised in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for
the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the
balance sheet date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect
of previous years.

IFRS not yet applied
The following IFRS’s are available for early application but have
not been applied by the company or group in these financial
statements:

• IFRS 7 ‘Financial instruments: Disclosure’ applicable for years

commencing on or after 1 January 2007

• Amendment to IFRS 39: Financial Guarantee Contracts’

applicable for years commencing on or after 1 January 2006

Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The
amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected
manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of
assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively
enacted at the balance sheet date.

The application of IFRS 7 in 2005 would not have affected the
balance sheets or income statement as the standard is concerned
only with disclosure. The group plans to adopt it on 1 January
2007.

The application of the amendment to IFRS 39 is not expected to
have any significant effect on the income statement.

A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is
probable that future taxable profits will be available against
which the asset can be utilised. 

Non-current assets held for sale
A non-current asset is classified as held for sale if its carrying
amount will be recovered principally through sale rather than
through continuing use, it is available for immediate sale and
sale is highly probable within one year.

On initial classification as held for sale, non-current assets 
and disposal groups are measured at the lower of previous
carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell with any
adjustments taken to profit or loss. The same applies to gains
and losses on subsequent remeasurement. IFRS 5 was adopted
early on 1 January 2004.

60

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

2 SEGMENT REPORTING

The group’s activities are wholly aligned to the sales, marketing, supply and distribution of floorcovering products. These activities are
carried out from business centres located in both the UK and Continental Europe. The group’s internal management structure and
financial reporting systems treat the UK and Continental Europe as two separate segments because of the difference in reward arising
from these two markets and this forms the basis for the geographical presentation of the primary segment information given below.

Revenue
External sales

Result
Segment result

Unallocated corporate expenses

Operating profit

Financial income
Financial expense
Taxation

Profit for the year

Other information
Segment assets including 
inter segment assets

Inter segment assets

Segment assets
Unallocated assets

Consolidated total assets

Segment liabilities including 
inter segment liabilities

Inter segment liabilities

Segment liabilities
Unallocated liabilities

Consolidated total liabilities

Capital expenditure
Depreciation
Amortisation
Asset impairment

UK

2005
£000

2004
£000

Continental Europe
2004
2005
£000
£000

Total

2005
£000

2004
£000

415,038

395,696

71,597

69,093

486,635

464,789

41,905

38,784

1,815

1,719

43,720

40,503

(2,222)

(1,579)

41,498

38,924

3,893
(4,551)
(12,352)

3,300
(3,740)
(11,738)

28,488

26,746

274,303
(3,229)

263,171
(3,424)

28,769
(365)

29,229
(187)

303,072
(3,594)

271,074

259,747

28,404

29,042

299,478
11,670

292,400
(3,611)

288,789
8,370

311,148

297,159

(127,623)
365

(127,560)
187

(18,238)
3,229

(20,219)
3,424

(145,861)
3,594

(147,779)
3,611

(127,258)

(127,373)

(15,009)

(16,795)

(142,267)
(33,054)

(144,168)
(30,631)

(175,321)

(174,799)

10,462
3,451
836
215

13,907
2,937
836
–

503
631
–
–

467
599
–
–

10,965
4,082
836
215

14,374
3,536
836
–

Each segment is a continuing operation.

Unallocated assets comprise deferred tax assets and assets held for resale. Unallocated liabilities comprise income tax, deferred tax
liabilities and employee benefits.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

61

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Management has access to information that provides details on sales and gross margin by principal product group and across the four
principal business sectors which comprise Regional multi-product, National multi-product, Residential specialist and Commercial
specialist. However, this information is not provided as a secondary segment since the group’s operations are not managed by reference
to these sub classifications and the presentation would require an arbitrary allocation of overheads, assets and liabilities undermining
the presentations validity and usefulness.

3 PROFIT BEFORE TAX AND AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION

The following are included in profit before tax:

Depreciation on property, plant and equipment
Amortisation of intangible assets
Impairment loss on property, plant and equipment
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
Equity settled share-based payment expenses
Operating lease rentals
Plant and machinery
Land and buildings

Auditors’ remuneration:

Group     – audit

– fees receivable by the auditors and their associates in respect of other services

Company – audit

2005
£000

4,082
836
215
(228)
196

7,369
1,707

2005
£000

181
63
59

2004
£000

3,554
836
–
11
57

6,819
1,844

2004
£000

170
42
37

Amounts paid to the company’s auditor in respect of services to the company, other than the audit of the company’s financial
statements, have not been disclosed as the information is required instead to be disclosed on a consolidated basis.

62

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

4 STAFF NUMBERS AND COSTS

The average number of people employed, including directors, during the year, analysed by category, was as follows:

Number of employees
Group

Number of employees
Company

2005

2004

2005

2004

By sector:

Floorcoverings
Central operations

By function:

Sales and distribution
Administration

The aggregate payroll costs were as follows:

Wages and salaries
Equity settled transactions
Social security costs
Contributions to defined contribution plans
Increase in liability for defined benefit plans

5 DIRECTORS’ EMOLUMENTS

Directors’ emoluments
Gains made on share options
Company contributions to money purchase pension plans

2,025
9

2,034

1,853
181

2,034

1,911
9

1,920

1,747
173

1,920

£000

£000

49,617
196
6,437
1,307
1,644

47,911
57
5,896
1,158
1,372

59,201

56,394

–
9

9

–
9

9

£000

2,603
71
324
8
1,644

4,650

2005
£000

1,852
364
7

–
9

9

–
9

9

£000

2,196
2
215
7
1,372

3,792

2004
£000

1,918
998
26

Further details of directors’ emoluments, share options and pension entitlement are given in the remuneration report on pages 38 and 44.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

63

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

6 FINANCE INCOME AND EXPENSE

Interest income
Bank interest
Other 

Return on defined pension plan assets

Financial income

Interest expense

Bank loans, overdrafts and other financial expenses
Interest on defined benefit pension plan obligation
Finance leases and similar hire purchase contracts

Financial expenses

7 TAXATION

Recognised in the income statement

Current tax expense
Current year
Adjustments for prior years

Deferred tax expense
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
Adjustments for prior years

Total tax in income statement

Reconciliation of effective tax rate

Profit before tax

Tax using the UK corporation tax rate 
Non-deductible expenses
Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions
Losses not recognised
Non-taxable gain on disposal
Over provided in prior years

2005
£000

1,329
87
2,477

3,893

2004
£000

886
141
2,273

3,300

(1,503)
(2,987)
(61)

(997)
(2,654)
(89)

(4,551)

(3,740)

2005
£000

12,764
(1,652)

11,112
(101)
1,341

2004
£000

12,685
331

13,016
(212)
(1,490)

1,240

(1,278)

12,352

11,738

2005

2004

%

£000

%

40,840

12,252
362
(38)
87
–
(311)

30%
0.9%
(0.1%)
0.2%

(0.8%)

30%
3.2%
0.0%
0.5%
0.2%
(3.0%)

£000

38,484

11,545
1,242
(9)
206
(87)
(1,159)

Total tax in income statement

30.2%

12,352

30.5%

11,738

During the period, certain computations under enquiry with HM Revenue and Customs have been finalised and agreed. The current
position has been reconciled to date, giving a net prior year credit of £311,000. This is made up of a current tax credit of £1,652,000
which, to a large extent, is matched with a corresponding deferred tax charge of £1,341,000.

64

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

8 CURRENT TAX LIABILITIES

The current tax liability of £11,139,000 (2004: £11,053,000) represents the amount of income taxes payable in respect of current and
prior year periods which exceed any amounts recoverable.

9 EARNINGS PER SHARE

The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share is based on the following data:

Earnings
Earnings for the purposes of basic earnings per share being profit 

attributable to equity holders of the parent

Earnings for the purposes of diluted earnings per share

Number of shares
Issued ordinary shares at 1 January
Effect of shares issued during the period

2005
£000

28,488

28,488

2004
£000

26,746

26,746

86,111,437
86,272

84,265,339
1,087,250

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of basic earnings per share

86,197,709

85,352,589

Effect of diluted potential ordinary shares:

Weighted average number of ordinary shares at 31 December 
Share options
Number of shares that would have been issued at fair value

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of 

diluted earnings per share

86,197,709
2,407,331
(1,813,602)

85,352,589
1,534,175
(737,011)

86,791,438

86,149,753

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

65

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

10 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – GROUP AND COMPANY

Group

Land & buildings

Freehold
£000

Long
leasehold
£000

Short
leasehold
£000

Plant &
equipment
£000

Under
construction
£000

Cost
Balance at 1 January 2004
Acquisitions through business combinations
Additions 
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale
Disposals
Effect of movements in foreign exchange
Reclassification

Balance at 31 December 2004

Balance at 1 January 2005
Additions
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale
Disposals
Effect of movements in foreign exchange
Asset impairment
Reclassification

Balance at 31 December 2005

Depreciation
Balance at 1 January 2004
Depreciation charge for the year
Acquisitions through business combinations
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale
Disposals
Effect of movements in foreign exchange
Reclassification

Balance at 31 December 2004

Balance at 1 January 2005
Depreciation charge for the year
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale
Disposals
Effect of movements in foreign exchange

Balance at 31 December 2005

Net book value
At 1 January 2004

48,693
–
1,101
(926)
–
62
119

49,049

49,049
3,052
(3,912)
–
(169)
(215)
11,922

59,727

3,198
1,118
–
(47)
–
27
59

4,355

4,355
1,170
(441)
–
(60)

5,024

45,495

At 31 December 2004 and 1 January 2005

44,694

At 31 December 2005

54,703

2,136
–
2,737
–
–
–
–

4,873

4,873
-
–
–
–
–
–

4,873

20
21
–
–
–
–
–

41

41
76
–
–
–

117

2,116

4,832

4,756

13,496
455
2,001
–
(1,063)
31
(22)

3,441
–
8,505
–
–
–
–

Total
£000

68,129
455
14,374
(926)
(1,063)
95
–

14,898

11,946

81,064

14,898
5,747
–
(1,696)
(135)
–
–

18,814

3,018
2,391
201
–
(932)
19
(23)

4,674

4,674
2,820
–
(1,530)
(100)

5,864

10,478

10,224

11,946
1,977
–
–
–
–
(11,922)

81,064
10,964
(3,912)
(1,696)
(304)
(215)
–

2,001

85,901

–
–
–
–
–
–
–

-

–
–
–
–
–

–

3,441

11,946

6,505
3,536
201
(47)
(932)
47
–

9,310

9,310
4,082
(441)
(1,530)
(160)

11,261

61,624

71,754

363
–
30
–
–
2
(97)

298

298
188
–
–
–
–
–

486

269
6
–
–
–
1
(36)

240

240
16
–
–
–

256

94

58

230

12,950

2,001

74,640

66

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

10 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – GROUP AND COMPANY – CONTINUED

Asset impairment
The asset impairment is recognised in administration expenses in the income statement. The impairment arises in connection with a
property that will be vacated during 2007 and which does not presently meet the requirements of IFRS 5 relating to non-current assets
held for sale. A preliminary assessment has indicated that net book value exceeds the property’s fair value which equates to market
value less marketing and selling costs.

Company

Land & buildings

Freehold
£000

Long
leasehold
£000

Short
leasehold
£000

Plant &
equipment
£000

Under
construction
£000

Cost
Balance at 1 January 2004
Additions 
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale
Disposals

Balance at 31 December 2004

Balance at 1 January 2005
Additions
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale
Disposals
Reclassification
Asset impairment

Balance at 31 December 2005

Depreciation
Balance at 1 January 2004
Depreciation charge for the year
Disposals
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale

Balance at 31 December 2004

Balance at 1 January 2005
Depreciation charge for the year
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale
Disposals

Balance at 31 December 2005

Net book value
At 1 January 2004

44,090
1,096
(926)
–

44,260

44,260
3,031
(3,912)
–
11,922
(215)

55,086

1,987
860
–
(47)

2,800

2,800
928
(441)
–

3,287

42,103

At 31 December 2004 and 1 January 2005

41,460

At 31 December 2005

51,799

2,136
2,737
–
–

4,873

4,873
–
–
–
–
–

4,873

20
21
–
–

41

41
76
–
–

117

2,116

4,832

4,756

196
–
–
–

196

196
–
–
–
–
–

196

196
–
–
–

196

196
–
–
–

196

-

–

–

Total
£000

50,436
12,340
(926)
(22)

3,441
8,505
–
–

11,946

61,828

11,946
1,977
–
–
(11,922)
–

61,828
5,121
(3,912)
(108)
–
(215)

2,001

62,714

–
–
–
–

-

–
–
–
–

–

2,684
913
(22)
(47)

3,528

3,528
1,034
(441)
(72)

4,049

3,441

11,946

47,752

58,300

573
2
–
(22)

553

553
113
–
(108)
–
–

558

481
32
(22)
–

491

491
30
–
(72)

449

92

62

109

2,001

58,665

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

67

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

10 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – GROUP AND COMPANY – CONTINUED

Leased plant and machinery
At 31 December 2005, the net carrying amount of leased plant and machinery was £nil (2004: £100,000). Depreciation for the year on
this asset was £nil (2004: £43,000).

Property, plant and equipment under construction
During the year ended 31 December 2005, the group acquired land in Leeds with the intention of building a new warehouse and
distribution facility on the site. The costs incurred up to the balance sheet date on this new facility were £2,001,000.

Fair value of UK freehold and long leasehold land and buildings
A full independent valuation of UK freehold and long leasehold land and buildings was carried out as at 31 December 2004 by Lambert
Smith Hampton, a firm of chartered surveyors and valuers, in accordance with the General Principles and Practice Statements contained
within the Appraisal and Valuation Standards produced by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. Properties were valued on an
existing use basis which is consistent with the basis used for previous valuations. The valuation revealed a surplus of £3,730,000
which when added to previous revaluations brings the total surplus at 31 December 2004 to £6,615,000. Following the adoption of
IFRS, the revaluation surplus is not reflected in the balance sheets of the company or the group.

68

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

11 INTANGIBLE ASSETS – GROUP 

Cost
Balance at 1 January 2004
Acquisitions through business combinations

Balance at 31 December 2004

Balance at 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2005

Amortisation 
Balance at 1 January 2004
Amortisation for the year

Balance at 31 December 2004

Balance at 1 January 2005
Amortisation for the year

Balance at 31 December 2005

Net book value
At 1 January 2004

At 31 December 2004 and 1 January 2005

At 31 December 2005

Amortisation
The amortisation charge is recognised in administration expenses in the income statement.

Impairment tests for cash-generating units containing goodwill
The following cash-generating units have significant carrying amounts of goodwill:

UK 
Continental Europe 

Goodwill
£000

Customer
lists
£000

78,778
–

78,778

78,778

65,568
–

65,568

65,568
–

65,568

13,210

13,210

13,210

–
1,672

1,672

1,672

–
836

836

836
836

1,672

–

836

–

Total
£000

78,778
1,672

80,450

80,450

65,568
836

66,404

66,404
836

67,240

13,210

14,046

13, 210

2005
£000

6,671
6,539

2004
£000

7,507
6,539

13,210

14,046

On acquisition, each cash-generating unit is fully integrated into the group’s business model and benefits from shared purchasing,
common IT systems and other shared support services including warehousing and logistics. Accordingly, it is not possible to separately
test each individual cash-generating unit for goodwill impairment.

Goodwill by geographical segments has been separately identified and measured for impairment. The recoverable amount of each cash-
generating unit has been assessed on a value in use basis using the operating profit of each geographical segment for 2005 and
extrapolating forward assuming forecast inflationary growth rates for the territories in which the cash-generating units are located.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

69

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

12 INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

The company has the following investments in subsidiaries:

Company

HFD Limited
MCD Group Limited
Lethem-Vergeer BV
DFA SA
Belcolor AG

Summary information on investments in subsidiary undertakings is as follows:

Cost
At 1 January 2005 
Share options granted to employees of subsidiary undertakings

Country of
Incorporation

Ownership

2005

2004

Great Britain
Great Britain
Netherlands
France
Switzerland

Shares
£000

118,143
125

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

Loans
£000

28,437
–

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

Total
£000

146,580
125

At 31 December 2005

118,268

28,437

146,705

Provisions
At 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2005

At 31 December 2004

Carrying value
At 31 December 2005

51,870

–

51,870

66,273

28,437

94,710

66,398

28,437

94,835

Loans shown as part of investment in subsidiaries occurred on acquisition and are deemed to be part of the investment cost of the
related business.

70

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

13 DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES – GROUP

Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following:

Assets

Liabilities

Net

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Employee benefits
Provisions
Other items

2005
£000

1,403

2005
£000

2004
£000

(539)
(7,047)
(377)
(236)

(386)
(5,772)
(382)
(1,627)

Tax (assets) / liabilities

(8,199)

(8,167)

1,403

Movement in deferred tax during the year

2004
£000

1,139
73
–
–
–

1,212

2005
£000

1,403
(539)
(7,047)
(377)
(236)

2004
£000

1,139
(313)
(5,772)
(382)
(1,627)

(6,796)

(6,955)

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Employee benefits
Provisions
Other

Movement in deferred tax during the prior year

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Employee benefits
Provisions
Other

1 January
2005
£000

Recognised
in income
£000

Recognised 31 December
2005
£000

in equity
£000

1,139
(313)
(5,772)
(382)
(1,627)

264
(226)
(194)
5
1,391

–
–
(1,081)
–
–

1,403
(539)
(7,047)
(377)
(236)

(6,955)

1,240

(1,081)

(6,796)

1 January
2004
£000

Recognised
in income
£000

Recognised
in equity
£000

31 December
2004
£000

1,981
(70)
(5,478)
(188)
(1,627)

(842)
(243)
1
(194)
–

(5,382)

(1,278)

–
–
(295)
–
–

(295)

1,139
(313)
(5,772)
(382)
(1,627)

(6,955)

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

71

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

13 DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES – COMPANY

Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following:

Assets

Liabilities

Net

Property, plant and equipment
Employee benefits
Provisions

2005
£000

–
(6,480)
(149)

2004
£000

–
(5,704)
–

2005
£000

1,616
–
–

Tax (assets)/liabilities

(6,629)

(5,704)

1,616

2004
£000

96
–
–

96

2005
£000

1,616
(6,480)
(149)

2004
£000

96
(5,704)
–

(5,013)

(5,608)

Movement in deferred tax during the year

Property, plant and equipment
Employee benefits
Provisions

Movement in deferred tax during the prior year

Property, plant and equipment
Employee benefits
Provisions

1 January
2005
£000

Recognised
in income
£000

Recognised 31 December
2005
£000

in equity
£000

96
(5,704)
–

1,520
(157)
(149)

–
(619)
–

1,616
(6,480)
(149)

(5,608)

1,214

(619)

(5,013)

1 January
2004
£000

Recognised
in income
£000

Recognised
in equity
£000

31 December
2004
£000

1,361
(4,608)
(64)

(1,265)
20
64

–
(1,116)
–

96
(5,704)
–

(3,311)

(1,181)

(1,116)

(5,608)

72

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

14 INVENTORIES

Finished goods and goods held for resale

Cost of sales consists of the following:

Material cost
Processing cost
Other

Group

2005
£000

2004
£000

91,160

79,692

Company

2005
£000

–

Group

Company

2005
£000

330,147
3,616
2,807

2004
£000

316,272
4,565
3,087

336,570

323,924

2005
£000

–
–
–

–

2004
£000

–

2004
£000

–
–
–

–

Processing cost includes the net movement in inventory provisions. During the year provisions increased by £136,000 (2004: £664,000) to
£5,869,000 (2004: £5,733,000). Inventory held at net book value at 31 December 2005 amounted to £24,882,000 (2004: £23,987,000).

15 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Trade receivables
Prepayments and accrued income
Other receivables

Group

Company

2005
£000

66,602
3,480
14,193

84,275

2004
£000

66,274
3,794
15,482

85,550

2005
£000

217
420
1,683

2,320

2004
£000

22
310
2,346

2,678

Included within trade and other receivables is £1,500,000 (2004: £1,500,000) for the group and £1,500,000 (2004: £1,500,000) for the
company expected to be recovered in more than twelve months.

16 CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND BANK OVERDRAFTS

Group

Company

Cash and cash equivalents per balance sheet
Bank overdrafts

2005
£000

36,193
–

2004
£000

37,747
(279)

2005
£000

31,265
–

Cash and cash equivalents per cash flow statements 

36,193

37,468

31,265

2004
£000

5,473
–

5,473

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

73

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

17 NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Assets classified as held for sale:
Property, plant and equipment

Group

Company

2005
£000

3,471

2004
£000

203

2005
£000

3,471

2004
£000

203

At 31 December 2005, assets classified as held for sale comprise two properties which are expected to be sold during 2006. Proceeds, 
net of sales and marketing costs, are likely to be £4,200,000.

At 31 December 2004, a property at Somerton was held for sale with a carrying value of £203,000 and, on 29 July 2005, it was
subsequently sold for proceeds of £397,000 net of costs totalling £5,000, creating a profit on disposal of £194,000. There was no gain 
or loss on initial classification of this asset.

18 OTHER INTEREST-BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS

This note provides information about the contractual terms of the group’s and company’s interest-bearing loans and borrowings. For
more information about the group’s and company’s exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk, see note 23.

Non-current liabilities
Finance lease liabilities

Current liabilities
Unsecured bank loans
Finance lease liabilities

Group

Company

2005
£000

267

267

–
471

471

2004
£000

738

738

687
437

1,124

2005
£000

267

267

–
471

471

2004
£000

738

738

–
430

430

The group has undrawn committed borrowing facilities expiring in one year or less which, at 31 December 2005, amounted to
£51,802,000 (2004: £54,529,000).

Terms and debt repayment schedule 
The unsecured bank loan from a Swiss bank, on which the interest was paid at a fixed rate of 1.98% was repaid during the year.

As more fully explained in note 23, classifications of financial liabilities are determined on different bases in 2005 and 2004 due to
the transitional provisions of IAS 32 and IAS 39.

74

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

18 OTHER INTEREST-BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS – CONTINUED

Analysis of debt in 2004
Debt may be analysed as falling due as follows:

Bank loans and overdrafts

On demand
Within one year

Finance lease liabilities
Finance lease liabilities are payable as follows:

Group
£000

Company
£000

279
687

966

–
–

–

Group

Less than one year
Between one and five years

Company

Less than one year
Between one and five years

Minimum
lease
payments
2005
£000

516 
267

783

Minimum
lease
payments
2005
£000

516 
267

783

Interest
2005
£000

Principal
2005
£000

(45)
–

(45)

471
267

738

Interest
2005
£000

Principal
2005
£000

(45)
–

(45)

471
267

738

Minimum 
lease
payments
2004
£000

523
738

Interest
2004
£000

(86)
(45)

Principal
2004
£000

437 
783

1,306

(131)

1,175

Minimum 
lease
payments
2004
£000

523
738

Interest
2004
£000

(86)
(45)

Principal
2004
£000

437
783

1,306

(131)

1,175

19 TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Trade payables
Taxation and social security
Non-trade payables and accrued expenses

Group

Company

2005
£000

109,765
10,585
21,179

2004
£000

110,455
9,204
22,369

141,529

142,028

2005
£000

192
365
4,975

5,532

2004
£000

1,506
–
3,825

5,331

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

75

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Pension plans
During the year, the group operated defined benefit and of defined contribution plans. The Headlam Group plc Staff Retirement
Benefits Scheme is the principal defined benefit plan which provides benefits to group employees that have been admitted into the
scheme. The scheme is self-administered and its assets are held independently of the company’s finances. The scheme is funded partly
by contributions from members and partly by contributions from the company at rates advised by professionally qualified actuaries. The
latest actuarial valuation was carried out as at 31 March 2005 using the projected unit method. The main annual rate assumptions
used by the actuary were, increase in salaries 4.5%, increase of pensions in payment 2.5%, discount rate before retirement 6.7%,
discount rate after retirement 4.7% and inflation 2.5%. Assets were taken at their audited market value at the valuation date.

The total group cost of operating the plans during the year was £2,951,000 (2004: £2,530,000) and, at 31 December 2005, there was
an amount of £156,000 (2004: £226,000) owed to the plans, being employer and employee contributions due for December 2005 but
not received by 31 December 2005.

Included within the total group cost are costs relating to the group’s defined contribution plans. The pension cost for the year
represents contributions payable by the group to the plans and amounted to £1,307,000 (2004: £1,158,000). Contributions amounting
to £76,000 (2004: £103,000) were payable to the scheme at 31 December 2005 and these are included in creditors.

As there is no contractual agreement or stated group policy for charging the net defined benefit cost of the plan to participating
entities, the net defined benefit cost of the pension plan is recognised fully by the sponsoring employer, which is Headlam Group plc.
The company then recognises a cost equal to its contribution payable for the period.

Group

Company

2005
£000

2004
£000

2005
£000

2004
£000

Present value of funded defined benefit obligations
Fair value of plan assets

(64,750)
44,524

(54,729)
36,815

(64,750)
44,524

(54,729)
36,815

Net obligations

(20,226)

(17,914)

(20,226)

(17,914)

Recognised liability for defined benefit obligations
Other long term employee benefits

(20,226)
(286)

(17,914)
(451)

(20,226)
–

(17,914)
–

Total employee benefits

Split:
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities

Total employee benefits

(20,512)

(18,365)

(20,226)

(17,914)

(1,080)
(19,432)

(722)
(17,643)

(1,080)
(19,146)

(722)
(17,192)

(20,512)

(18,365)

(20,226)

(17,914)

76

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Pension plans (continued)
Movements in present value of defined benefit obligation

At 1 January
Current service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial losses
Benefits paid
Contributions by members

At 31 December

Movements in fair value of plan assets

At 1 January
Expected return on plan assets
Actuarial gains
Contributions by employer
Contributions by members
Benefits paid

At 31 December  

Expense recognised in the income statement

Current service cost
Interest on defined benefit pension plan obligation
Expected return on defined benefit pension plan assets

Total              

Group

Company

2005
£000

54,729
1,134
2,987
6,711
(1,072)
261

2004
£000

47,184
991
2,646
4,786
(1,138)
260

2005
£000

54,729
1,134
2,987
6,711
(1,072)
261

2004
£000

47,184
991
2,646
4,786
(1,138)
260

64,750

54,729

64,750

54,729

Group

Company

2005
£000

36,815
2,477
4,134
1,909
261
(1,072)

2004
£000

33,018
2,273
1,030
1,372
260
(1,138)

2005
£000

36,815
2,477
4,134
1,909
261
(1,072)

2004
£000

33,018
2,273
1,030
1,372
260
(1,138)

44,524

36,815

44,524

36,815

Group

2005
£000

1,134
2,987
(2,477)

2004
£000

991
2,654
(2,273)

1,644

1,372

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

77

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Pension plans (continued)
The expense is recognised in the following line items in the income statement:

Administrative expenses
Finance expense

Group

2004
£000

991
381

1,372

2005
£000

1,134
510

1,644

Cumulative actuarial gains and losses reported in the statement of recognised income and expenses since 1 January 2004, the
transition date to IFRS, are £6,325,000 (2004: £3,756,000). Company £6,325,000 (2004: £3,756,000).

The fair value of the plan assets and the return on those assets were as follows:

Equities          
Government debt
Annuities
Other              

Group

Company

2005
Fair value
£000

2004
Fair value
£000

2005
Fair value
£000

2004
Fair value
£000

28,975
11,856
3,195
498

23,888
9,886
2,982
59

28,975
11,856
3,195
498

23,888
9,886
2,982
59

44,524

36,815

44,524

36,815

Actual return on plan assets 

6,611

3,303

6,611

3,303

The expected rates of return on plan assets are determined by reference to relevant indices. The overall expected rate of return is
calculated by weighting the individual rates in accordance with the anticipated balance in the plan’s investment portfolio.

78

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Principal actuarial assumptions, expressed as weighted averages, are as follows:

Discount rate
Future salary increases
Future pension increases
Inflation rate
Expected rate of return on plan assets

History of plans
The history of the plans for the current and prior periods is as follows:  
Balance sheet

Group

Company

2004
%

5.50
4.90
2.90
2.90
6.62

2005
%

5.00
4.90
2.90
2.90
6.12

2004
%

5.50
4.90
2.90
2.90
6.62

2005
%

5.00
4.90
2.90
2.90
6.12

Group

Company

2005
£000

2004
£000

2005
£000

2004
£000

Present value of defined benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets

(64,750)
44,524

(54,729)
36,815

(64,750)
44,524

(54,729)
36,815

Deficit

Experience adjustments

Experience adjustments on plan liabilities
Experience adjustments on plan assets

Experience adjustment as a percentage of plan liabilities
Experience adjustment as a percentage of plan assets

(20,226)

(17,914)

(20,226)

(17,914)

Group

Company

2005
£000

6,711
4,134

10.4%
9.3%

2004
£000

4,786
1,030

8.7%
2.8%

2005
£000

6,711
4,134

10.4%
9.3%

2004
£000

4,786
1,030

8.7%
2.8%

The group and company expect to contribute approximately £2,063,000 to defined benefit plans in the next financial year.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

79

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Share-based payments – Group 
Executive directors and executive management currently participate in executive share option schemes. The option price may not be
less than the greater of the mid-market value of the company’s shares at the time when the options were granted or the nominal
value. Options granted under the 1998 Inland Revenue approved scheme are normally exercisable between the third and tenth
anniversaries of their date of grant, subject to the movement of the group’s basic earnings per share exceeding that of the General
Index of Retail Prices, all items, over the relevant period.

Options granted under the 1996 and 1998 unapproved schemes are normally exercisable between the third and seventh anniversaries 
of their date of grant, subject to the movement of the group’s basic earnings per share exceeding that of the General Index of Retail
Prices, all items, by 2% per annum and 3% per annum respectively over the relevant period.

Additionally, the company operates a savings related share option scheme which is open to all UK employees subject to eligibility
criteria determined by the directors prior to each option grant. The most recent grant was on 28 October 2002 where all employees
with over one year’s service were invited to participate. As this savings related share option scheme was granted before 7 November
2002, the recognition and measurement principles in IFRS 2 have not been applied in accordance with the transitional provisions in
IFRS 1 and IFRS 2.

80

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

The terms and conditions of the grants are as follows, whereby all options are settled by physical delivery of shares:

Grant date/employees entitled

Unapproved 1998 scheme grant to
key management 14 December 1998

Number of 
instruments

2005

–

2004

50,000

Approved 1988 scheme grant to key
management 10 January 2001

35,500

102,500

Unapproved 1998 scheme grant to
key management 10 January 2001

–

274,063

Vesting conditions

Contractual life 
of options

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 3% pa over the relevant period

14/12/01 –
14/12/05

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices over the relevant period

10/01/04 –
10/01/11

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 3% pa over the relevant period

10/01/04 –
10/01/08

Three year sharesave scheme granted
to other employees 28 October 2002

Five year sharesave scheme granted
to other employees 28 October 2002

203,679

212,009

One year’s service

401,152

426,495

One year’s service

Approved 1998 scheme grant to key
management 14 April 2003

382,112

382,112

Unapproved 1998 scheme grant to
key management 14 April 2003

84,888

84,888

Unapproved 1998 scheme grant to
key management 22 August 2005

1,242,864

Approved 1998 scheme grant to key
management 22 August 2005

57,136

–

–

Total share options

2,407,331 1,532,067

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices over the relevant period

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices over the relevant period

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 3%-5% pa over the relevant
period

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 2% pa over the relevant period

22/04/08 –
22/08/15

01/01/06 –
30/06/06

01/01/08 –
30/06/08

14/04/06 –
14/04/13

14/04/06 –
14/04/10

22/04/08 –
22/08/12

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

81

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Share-based payments – Group – continued
The number and weighted average exercise prices of share options are as follows:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year
Exercised during the year
Granted during the year
Lapsed during the year

Weighted 
average 
exercise price
2005

Number
of options

2005

Weighted 
average
exercise price
2004

Number
of options

2004

186.5
141.9
420.0
197.0

1,532,067
(401,417)
1,300,000
(23,319)

166.5
149.6
–
179.3

3,417,356
(1,846,098)
–
(39,191)

Outstanding at the end of the year

319.9

2,407,331

186.5

1,532,067

Exercisable at the end of the year

128.0

35,500

139.4

426,563

Options were exercised on a regular basis during the year. The average share price during the year was 432.0p (2004: 415.0p). 

The options outstanding at the year end have an exercise price in the range of 128.0p to 420.0p and a weighted average contractual
life of 6.8 years.

The fair value of services received in return for share options granted are measured by reference to the fair value of share options granted.
The estimate of the fair value of the services received is measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. 

It is expected that the options will be exercised as soon as they reach maturity.

There are no market conditions associated with the share option grants.

The expected volatility is based on historic volatility calculated over the weighted average remaining life of the share options.

82

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Fair value at measurement date

Weighted average share price
Exercise price
Expected volatility (expressed as weighted average volatility used in the modelling 

under the Black-Scholes model)

Option life (expressed as weighted average life used in the modelling 

under the Black-Scholes model)

Expected dividends 
Risk-free interest rate (based on UK Gilts)

The total expenses recognised for the year arising from share based payments are as follows:

Share options granted in 2003 under the approved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2003 under the unapproved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2005 under the approved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2005 under the unapproved 1998 scheme

Total carrying amount of liabilities

2005

2004

89.01p

37.13p

432p
420p

31.84

3 years
3.6%
4.3%

2005
£000

47
10
6
133

196

415p
215p

26.68

3 years
3.3%
4.0%

2004
£000

47
10
–
–

57

Share-based payments – Company 
Executive directors and executive management currently participate in executive share option schemes. The option price may not be
less than the greater of the mid-market value of the group’s shares at the time when the options were granted or the nominal value.
Options granted under the 1998 Inland Revenue approved scheme are normally exercisable between the third and tenth anniversaries
of their date of grant, subject to the movement of the group’s basic earnings per share exceeding that of the General Index of Retail
Prices, all items, over the relevant period.

Options granted under the 1996 and 1998 unapproved schemes are normally exercisable between the third and seventh anniversaries 
of their date of grant, subject to the movement of the group’s basic earnings per share exceeding that of the General Index of Retail
Prices, all items, by 2% per annum and 3% per annum respectively over the relevant period.

Additionally, the company operates a savings related share option scheme which is open to employees subject to eligibility
criteria determined by the directors prior to each option grant. The most recent grant was on 28 October 2002 where employees
with over one year’s service were invited to participate. As this savings related share option scheme was granted before 
7 November 2002, the recognition and measurement principles in IFRS 2 have not been applied in accordance with the
transitional provisions in IFRS 1 and IFRS 2.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

83

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

The terms and conditions of the grants are as follows, whereby all options are settled by physical delivery of shares:

Grant date/employees entitled

Unapproved 1998 scheme grant to
key management 14 December 1998

Unapproved 1998 scheme grant to
key management 10 January 2001

Number of 
instruments

Vesting conditions

Contractual life 
of options

2005

–

–

2004

50,000

100,000

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 3% pa over the relevant period

14/12/01 –
14/12/05

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 3% pa over the relevant period

10/01/04 –
10/01/08

Five year sharesave scheme granted
to other employees 28 October 2002

38,144

38,144

One year’s service

Approved 1998 scheme grant to key
management 14 April 2003

15,000

15,000

Unapproved 1998 scheme grant to
key management 22 August 2005

628,574

Approved 1998 scheme grant to key
management 22 August 2005

21,426

–

–

Total share options

703,144

203,144

01/01/08 –
30/08/08

14/04/06 –
14/04/13

22/04/08 –
22/08/12

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices over the relevant period

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 3%-5% pa over the relevant
period

Movement of the group’s basic earnings per
share exceeding that of the General Index of
Retail Prices by 2% pa over the relevant period

22/04/08 –
22/08/15

84

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Share-based payments – Company – continued
The number and weighted average exercise prices of share options are as follows:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year
Exercised during the year
Granted during the year

Weighted 
average 
exercise price
2005

Number
of options

2005

Weighted 
average
exercise price
2004

171.4
160.5
420.0

203,144
(150,000)
650,000

192.5
200.4
–

Number
of options

2004

745,644
(542,500)
–

Outstanding at the end of the year

403.5

703,144

171.4

203,144

Exercisable at the end of the year

–

–

160.5

150,000

The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of share options exercised during the period was 403.0p (2004: 399.0).

The options outstanding at the year end have an exercise price in the range of 197.0p to 420.0p and a weighted average contractual
life of 9.1 years.

The fair value of services received in return for share options granted are measured by reference to the fair value of share options
granted. The estimate of the fair value of the services received is measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. It is
expected that the options will be exercised as soon as they reach maturity.

There are no market conditions associated with the share option grants. 

The expected volatility is based on historic volatility calculated over the weighted average remaining life of the share options.

Fair value at measurement date

Weighted average share price
Exercise price
Expected volatility (expressed as weighted average volatility used in the modelling 

under the Black-Scholes model)

Option life (expressed as weighted average life used in the modelling 

under the Black-Scholes model)

Expected dividends 
Risk-free interest rate (based on UK Gilts)

2005

2004

89.01

37.13p

432p
420p

31.84

3 years
3.6%
4.3%

415p
215p

26.68

3 years
3.3%
4.0%

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

85

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – CONTINUED

Share-based payments – Company – continued
The total expenses recognised for the year arising from share based payments are as follows:

Share options granted in 2003 under the approved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2005 under the approved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2005 under the unapproved 1998 scheme

Total carrying amount of liabilities

2005
£000

2
2
67

71

2004
£000

2
–
–

2

Share based payments awarded to employees of subsidiary undertakings and recognised as an investment in subsidiary undertakings in
the company are as follows:

Share options granted in 2003 under the approved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2003 under the unapproved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2005 under the approved 1998 scheme
Share options granted in 2005 under the unapproved 1998 scheme

Total carrying amount of investments

2005
£000

45
10
4
66

125

2004
£000

45
10
–
–

55

86 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

21 OTHER LONG TERM EMPLOYEE BENEFITS – GROUP

During the year, the group operated an employment indemnity scheme in connection with a foreign subsidiary undertaking to
provide for lump sum cash payments due to employees retiring on their normal retirement date. 

Present retirement indemnity obligations

Movements in present value of retirement indemnity obligations

Current service cost
Actuarial (gains)/losses

Group

Group

2005
£000

286

2005
£000

(9)
(156)

(165)

2004
£000

451

2004
£000

40
36

76

The current service cost and actuarial gains and losses are recognised in the income statement in administration expenses.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

87

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

22 CAPITAL AND RESERVES

Reconciliation of movement in capital and reserves – group

Balance at 1 January 2004
Total recognised income and expense
Equity-settled share based payment 

transactions, net of tax

Share options exercised by employees
Deferred tax on Schedule 23 

share options (pre Nov 2002)

Dividends 

Share
capital

Share
premium

Translation
reserve

£000

4,213
–

–
93

–
–

£000

£000

49,061
–

–
2,670

–
–

–
(256)

–
–

–
–

Balance at 31 December 2004

4,306

51,731

(256)

Balance at 1 January 2005
Adjustment in respect of adoption 

of IAS 32 and IAS 39 on 
1 January, net of tax

Total recognised income and expense
Equity-settled share based payment 

transactions, net of tax

Share options exercised by employees
Deferred tax on Schedule 23 

share options (pre November 2002)

Dividends 

4,306

51,731

(256)

–
(321)

(13)
13

–
–

–
20

–
–

–
–

–
549

–
–

–
–

–
–

Balance at 31 December 2005

4,326

52,280

(577)

The aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items that are charged or credited to equity is £7,167,000 (2004: £6,085,000).

Cash flow
hedging
reserve
£000

Retained
earnings

Total
equity

£000

£000

–
–

–
–

–
–

–

–

–
–

–
–

–

55,024
24,141

57
–

108,298
23,885

57
2,763

(848)
(11,795)

(848)
(11,795)

66,579

122,360

66,579

122,360

–
26,827

196
–

(13)
26,519

196
569

172
(13,976)

172
(13,976)

79,798

135,827

88

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

22 CAPITAL AND RESERVES – CONTINUED

Reconciliation of movement in capital and reserves – company

Share 
capital

Share
premium

Translation
reserve

Special
reserve

Retained
earnings

Total
parent
equity
£000

106,352
16,601

57
2,763

Balance at 1 January 2004
Total recognised income and expense
Equity-settled share based payment transactions, 

net of tax

Share options exercised by employees
Deferred tax on Schedule 23 

share options (pre Nov 2002)

Dividends 

£000

4,213
–

–
93

–
–

£000

£000

£000

£000

49,061
–

–
2,670

–
–

–
(1,759)

20,578
–

–
–

–
–

–
–

–
–

32,500
18,360

57
–

(27)
(11,795)

(27)
(11,795)

Balance at 31 December 2004

4,306

51,731

(1,759)

20,578

39,095

113,951

Balance at 1 January 2005
Total recognised income and expense
Equity-settled share based payment transactions, 

4,306
–

51,731
–

(1,759)
–

20,578
–

net of tax

Share options exercised by employees
Deferred tax on Schedule 23 

share options (pre Nov 2002)

Dividends 

–
20

–
–

–
549

–
–

–
–

–
–

–
–

–
–

39,095
37,691

196
–

113,951
37,691

196
569

(173)
(13,976)

(173)
(13,976)

Balance at 31 December 2005

4,326

52,280

(1,759)

20,578

62,833

138,258

The aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items that are charged or credited to equity is £6,066,000 (2004: £5,329,000).

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

89

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

22 CAPITAL AND RESERVES – CONTINUED

Share capital

In thousands of shares

On issue at 1 January 
Allotted under share option scheme

On issue at 31 December – fully paid

Authorised
Ordinary shares of 5p each
5.6% cumulative preference shares of £1 each

Allotted, called up and fully paid
Ordinary shares of 5p each
5.6% cumulative preference shares of £1 each

Shares classified as liabilities
Shares classified in shareholders funds

5.6% cumulative 
preference shares of £1 each

Ordinary shares

2005

2004

2005

2004

–
–

–

–
–

–

86,111.437
401,417

84,265,339
1,846,098

86,512,854

86,111,437

2005
£000

5,392
50

5,442

4,326
–

4,326

–
4,326

4,326

2004
£000

5,392
50

5,442

4,306
–

4,306

–
4,306

4,306

Ordinary shares
The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time and are entitled to one vote per share at
meetings of the company. 

Preference shares
The preference shares carry a fixed cumulative preferential dividend at the rate of 5.6% per annum. On a winding up they entitle the
holders to repayment of the capital paid up on the shares, together with a premium of 7.50p per share and a sum equal to any arrears
of the fixed dividend thereon.

The dividend will be calculated to the date of the return of capital and will be payable irrespective of whether such dividend has been
declared or earned or not, in priority to any payment to the holders of any other shares. The preference shares do not entitle the
holders to any further participation in the profits or assets of the company. The preference shares have no voting rights unless the
fixed cumulative preference dividend is in arrears for a period of six months or a resolution is to be proposed to alter the provisions of
the Memorandum of Association of the company with respect to its objects, or varying or abrogating any of the special rights or
privilege attached to preference shares, or for winding up the company.

90 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

22 CAPITAL AND RESERVES – CONTINUED

Translation reserve
The translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign
operations.

Cash flow hedging reserve
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments
related to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred.

Dividends

Interim dividend for 2004 of 4.0p paid 3 January 2005
Final dividend for 2004 of 12.25p paid 4 July 2005
Interim dividend for 2003 of 3.56p paid 5 January 2004
Final dividend for 2003 of 10.25p paid 1 July 2004

2005
£000

3,421
10,555
–
–

2004
£000

–
–
3,030
8,765

13,976

11,795

The final proposed dividend of 13.6p per share (2004: £12.25p per share) will not be provided for until authorised by shareholders at
the forthcoming AGM.

Interim dividends of 4.4p per share (2004: 4.0p per share) are provided for when the dividend is paid.

The total value of dividends proposed but not recognised at 31 December 2005 is £15,582,000 (2004: £13,976,000).

23 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The main risks arising in the normal course of the group’s business are credit risk, interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. Derivative
transactions relate to forward currency contracts used to manage the currency risks from the group’s selling and buying activities.

Credit risk
The group and company have a credit policy in place and the exposure to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit evaluations
are performed on all new customers requiring credit over a certain amount and these are frequently reviewed by management to limit
exposure. The group does not require collateral in respect of financial assets.

At the balance sheet date, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented
by the carrying amount of each financial asset, including derivative financial instruments, in the balance sheet.

Interest rate risk
The group and company are exposed to interest rate fluctuations on its borrowings and cash deposits. It borrows principally in sterling,
euros and Swiss francs at both fixed and floating rates and places cash on deposit in sterling and euros at floating rates. During the
year, with the exception of a fixed term facility amounting to £nil (2004: £687,000) denominated in Swiss francs, the group
maintained its policy of borrowing at floating rates.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

91

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

23 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – CONTINUED

Effective interest rates and repricing analysis – group
In respect of income-earning financial assets and interest-bearing financial liabilities, the following table indicates their effective
interest rates at the balance sheet date and the periods in which they mature or, if earlier, are repriced. 

2005

2004

Effective
interest
rate
%

Total
£000

0 to
<1years
£000

1 to
<2years
£000

Effective
interest
rate
%

Total
£000

0 to
<1years
£000

1 to
<2years
£000

2 to
<5 years
£000

Cash and cash equivalents
Finance lease liabilities
Unsecured Swiss franc bank loan
Bank overdrafts

4.57
6.00
–
–

36,193
(738)
–
–

36,193
(471)
–
–

–
(267)
–
–

4.59
6.00
1.98
2.49

37,747
(1,175)
(687)
(278)

37,747
(437)
(687)
(278)

–
(471)
–
–

–
(267)
–
–

35,455

35,722

(267)

35,607

36,345

(471)

(267)

The unsecured Swiss franc bank loan incurred interest at a fixed rate. 

Comparative information for 2004 is provided in accordance with previous GAAP.

Effective interest rates and repricing analysis – company
In respect of income-earning financial assets and interest-bearing financial liabilities, the following table indicates their effective 
interest rates at the balance sheet date and the periods in which they mature or, if earlier, are repriced. 

2005

2004

Effective
interest
rate
%

Total
£000

0 to
<1years
£000

1 to
<2years
£000

Effective
interest
rate
%

Total
£000

0 to
<1years
£000

1 to
<2years
£000

2 to
<5years
£000

Cash and cash equivalents
Finance lease liabilities

4.57
6.00

31,265
(738)

31,265
(471)

–
(267)

4.59
6.00

5,473
(1,168)

5,473
(430)

–
(471)

–
(267)

30,527

30,794

(267)

4,305

5,043

(471)

(267)

Comparative information for 2004 is provided in accordance with previous GAAP.

92 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

23 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – CONTINUED

Foreign currency risk
The group and company are exposed to movements in currency exchange rates arising from transaction currency cash flows and the
translation of the results and net assets of overseas subsidiary operations. These exposures, however, have not had a significant effect
on the results and financial position of the group overall. The currencies giving rise to this risk are primarily the euro and Swiss franc.

For the twelve month period to 31 December 2005, 4.4% (2004: 4.4%) of the group’s operating profit was derived from overseas
subsidiaries and at 31 December 2005, 8.5% (2004: 8.5%) of the group’s operating assets related to overseas subsidiary operations.
Hedge accounting, following the adoption of IFRS, has not been applied to these operations given their relative size and because of
the onerous level of compliance required under IAS 39. 

The group and company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge its foreign currency transactional risk. All forward exchange
contracts have maturities of less than one year after the balance sheet date.

Gains and losses on currency contracts recognised as a liability as at 31 December 2005 amounted to £43,000 (2004: £13,000).

Unrecognised gains and losses on currency contracts and the movements during the year based on previous GAAP were as follows:

Unrecognised gains and losses at 1 January
Gains and losses arising in previous years that were recognised in the year

Gains and losses arising before 1 January that were not recognised in the year
Gains and losses arising in the year that were not recognised in the year

Unrecognised gains and losses on currency contracts at 31 December

Gains and losses expected to be recognised in the next financial year

The group and company do not use derivatives other than as described above

Gains

£000

2004
Losses

£000

Total net
losses
£000

–
–

–
–

–

–

(1)
1

–
–

(13)

(13)

(1)
1

–
–

(13)

(13)

Sensitivity analysis
In managing interest rate and currency risks the company and group aims to reduce the impact of short-term fluctuations on company
and group’s earnings. In the short term, income statement and net asset volatility arising from these exposures is not considered
significant. Over the longer-term, however, permanent changes in interest rates and foreign exchange would have an impact on the
consolidated income statement.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

93

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

23 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – CONTINUED

Fair values
The fair values together with the carrying amounts shown in the balance sheet are as follows:

Assets
Cash and cash equivalent
Trade and other receivables

Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
Current
Non-current

Carrying
amount
2005
£000

36,193
84,275

Group

Company

Fair
value
2005
£000

36,193
84,275

Carrying
amount
2005
£000

36,193
2,320

Fair
value
2005
£000

36,193
2,320

120,468

120,468

38,513

38,513

141,529

141,529

5,532

5,532

471
267

471
267

471
267

471
267

142,267

142,267

6,270

6,270

Trade receivables, trade payables and cash and cash equivalents – Fair values are assumed to approximate to cost due to the short term
maturity of the instrument.

Borrowings, other financial assets and other financial liabilities – Where available, market values have been used to determine fair values.
Where market values are not available, fair values have been estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using prevailing
interest rate curves. Amounts denominated in foreign currencies are valued at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date.

94 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

23 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – CONTINUED

The main functional currencies of the group are sterling, euros, Swiss francs and US dollars. The following analysis of net monetary
assets and liabilities shows the group’s currency exposures after the effects of forward contracts used to manage currency exposure.

The amount shown represents the transactional exposures which give rise to the net currency gains and losses recognised in the
consolidated income statement. Such exposures comprise the monetary assets and monetary liabilities of the group which are not
denominated in the operating currency of the operating unit involved.

Sterling
Other European

Total

Sterling
Other European

Total

Sterling
amount
£000

–
3

3

Sterling
amount
£000

–
–

–

2005
Euro
value
£000

141
29

170

2004
Euro
value
£000

536
69

605

US Dollar
amount
£000

–
–

–

US Dollar
amount
£000

38
–

38

value
£000

141
32

173

value
£000

574
69

643

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

95

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

24 ACQUISITIONS OF SUBSIDIARIES

On 1 April 2005, the group acquired the trade and assets of the retail division of Gaskell Flooring Limited, trading as Gaskell Wool Rich
and Tomkinson Carpets, for £425,596, satisfied in cash. The business supplies residential carpets to independent floorcovering retailers
and department stores within the UK. In the nine months to 31 December 2005, the business contributed net profit of £161,000 to
the consolidated net profit for the year. If the acquisition had occurred on 1 January 2005, contribution to the group revenue would
have been an estimated £3,029,000 and net profit would have been an estimated £175,000.

Effect of acquisitions
The acquisitions had the following effect on the group’s assets and liabilities:

Acquiree’s net assets at the acquisition date:

Inventories

Net identifiable assets and liabilities

Goodwill on acquisition

Consideration paid

Net cash outflow

Acquiree’s book 
values
£000

Fair value
adjustments 
£000

Acquisition
amounts
£000

426

426

–

–

426

426

–

(426)

(426)

No goodwill has arisen on the acquisition of the retail division of Gaskell Flooring Limited and no value has been attributed to the
trade names or customer lists.

96 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

24 ACQUISITIONS OF SUBSIDIARIES – CONTINUED

Acquisitions completed during 2004 had the following effect on the group’s assets and liabilities:

Acquiree’s net assets at the acquisition date:

Plant and equipment
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other payables

Net identifiable assets and liabilities

Intangible asset on acquisition

Consideration paid

Satisfied by:
Cash
Deferred consideration
Acquisition costs capitalised

Analysis of cash flows:
On completion
Costs of acquisition
Cash and cash equivalents

Acquiree’s book 
values 
£000

Fair value
adjustments 
£000

Acquisition
amounts
£000

255
1,977
4,795
69
(4,320)

2,776

–
–
–
–
–

–

255
1,977
4,795
69
(4,320)

2,776

1,672

(4,448)

3,788
600
60

4,448

(3,788)
(60)
69

(3,779)

The acquisitions during 2004 relate to the purchase of N.C.G. Limited, completed on 30 April 2004 and Kingsmead Carpets which was
completed on 17 September 2004.

Deferred consideration relates to the acquisition of N.C.G. Limited. £300,000 was paid on 29 April 2005 and £300,000 will be paid on
28 April 2006.

The intangible asset relates to customer lists purchased with N.C.G. Limited and has been amortised in full during 2004 and 2005.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

97

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

25 ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET FUNDS

Cash at bank and in hand
Bank overdraft

Debt due after one year
Finance leases and similar hire purchase contracts

At
1 January
2005
£000

37,747
(279)

37,468
(687)
(1,176)

Cash
flows
£000

(1,527)
269

(1,258)
662
438

At
Translation 31 December
2005
differences
£000
£000

(27)
10

(17)
25
–

36,193
–

36,193
–
(738)

35,605

(158)

8

35,455

98 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

26 OPERATING LEASES

Non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:

Group

Less than one year
Between one and five years
More than five years

Company

Less than one year
Between one and five years

Land and
buildings
£000

–
–
2,741

2005
Plant and
machinery
£000

1,596
16,829
1,762

Total
£000

1,596
16,829
4,503

2,741

20,187

22,928

Land and
buildings
£000

2005
Plant and
machinery
£000

–
–

–

2
42

44

Total
£000

2
42

44

Land and
buildings
£000

–
–
3,302

3,302

Land and
buildings
£000

–
–

–

2004
Plant and
machinery
£000

1,672
17,385
596

Total
£000

1,672
17,385
3,898

19,653

22,955

2004
Plant and
machinery
£000

6
18

24

Total
£000

6
18

24

The group leases the majority of its motor and commercial vehicles on terms that range between three and five years.

During the year ended 31 December 2005, £9,076,000 was recognised as an expense in the consolidated income statement in respect
of operating leases (2004: £8,663,000).

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

99

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

27 CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

Group
During the year ended 31 December 2005, the group entered into contracts to purchase property, plant and equipment for £8,448,000
(2004: £4,085,000). These commitments are expected to be settled in the following financial year.

Company
During the year ended 31 December 2005, the company entered into contracts to purchase property, plant and equipment for £8,448,000
(2004: £nil). These commitments are expected to be settled in the following financial year.

28 CONTINGENCIES

Third party guarantees

29 RELATED PARTIES

Group

Company

2005
460

2004
240

2005
–

2004
–

Group
Identity of related parties
The group has a related party relationship with its subsidiaries and with its directors and executive officers.

Transactions with key management personnel
As at 31 December 2005, directors of the company and their immediate relatives controlled 1.6 per cent of the voting shares of 
the company. 

Key management personnel are considered to be the directors and their remuneration is disclosed within the Directors’ remuneration
report on page 41.

100 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

29 RELATED PARTIES – CONTINUED

Company
Identity of related parties
The company has a related party relationship with its subsidiaries and with its directors and executive officers.

Transactions with key management personnel
As at 31 December 2005, directors of the company and their immediate relatives control 1.6 per cent of the voting shares of 
the company. 

Key management are considered to be the directors and their remuneration is disclosed within the remuneration report on page 41.

Transactions with other group companies

Highest
during 

Balance at
the year 31 December
2005
£000

£000

Highest
during
the year

£000

Balance at
31 December
2004
£000

Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings

25,163

23,272

29,340

25,163

Amounts due to subsidiary undertakings

(50,587)

(50,587)

(50,682)

(48,930)

The disclosure of the year end balance and the highest balance during the year is considered to provide a meaningful representation of
transactions between the company and its subsidiaries in the year. The highest balance is generally at the start or close of the
financial period since this is the time when the company levies its management charge.

Transactions reported in the income statement

Rental income
Dividends received
Management charges 
Interest expense

For year 
ended
31 December
2005
£000

For year 
ended
31 December
2004
£000

4,752
39,911
1,910
(1,254)

4,036
18,345
2,186
(117)

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

101

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

30 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

With the exception of changes in directors, noted in the director’s report, there have been no events after the balance sheet date that
require disclosure.

31 ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS

Management discussed the development, selection and disclosure of the group’s critical accounting policies and estimates and the
application of these policies and estimates with the audit committee. In applying the accounting policies, appropriate estimates have
been made in a number of areas and the actual outcome may differ from the position described in the company’s and group’s balance
sheet at 31 December 2005. The key sources of estimation uncertainty at the balance sheet date that may give rise to a material
adjustment to the carrying value of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are as follows:

Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The group is committed to
investing in new facilities where existing facilities fail to provide satisfactory customer service in a cost effective manner. When
construction on a new facility is initiated, the existing facility is marketed for sale and this action can on occasions give rise to an
adverse difference between cost and fair value. It has been assumed that at the balance sheet date, cost equates to fair value.

Goodwill impairment 
The impairment test for goodwill is dependent on the forecasts of the cash flows of the cash-generating units and the assumptions
relating to growth rate. No impairment resulted from the annual impairment test for 2005.

Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets are recognised at the balance sheet date based on the assumption that there is a high expectation that the asset
will be realised in due course. This assumption is dependant on the group’s ability to generate sufficient future taxable profits.

Non-current assets classified as held for sale
The inclusion of assets within non-current assets classified as held for sale and the realisation of the expected proceeds is based on
the assumption that contracts will complete during the financial year.

Employee benefits
The deficit relating to the group’s defined benefit pension plans is assessed annually in accordance with IAS 19 and after taking
independent actuarial advice. The amount of the deficit is dependent on plan asset and liability values and the actuarial assumptions
used to determine the deficit. Assumptions include asset growth rates, pension and salary increases, price inflation, discount rate used
to measure actuarial liabilities and mortality rates.

102 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

32 EXPLANATION OF TRANSITION TO IFRS – GROUP

As stated in note 1, these are the company’s and group’s first consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

The accounting policies set out in note 1 have been applied in preparing the financial statements for the year ended 31 December
2005, the comparative information presented in these financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2004 and in the
preparation of an opening IFRS balance sheet at 1 January 2004, the company’s and group’s date of transition.

In preparing its opening IFRS balance sheet, the company and group have adjusted amounts reported previously in financial
statements prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, its former basis of accounting. An explanation of how the transition from UK GAAP
to IFRS has affected the group’s financial performance and the company and group financial position and cash flows is set out in the
following tables and the notes that accompany the tables.

Reconciliation of profit for year ended 31 December 2004

Revenue
Cost of sales

Gross profit
Net operating expenses

Operating profit 

Net financing costs

Profit before tax
Taxation

Profit for the year

Effect of
transition 
to IFRS 
£000

-
-

-
524

524

UKGAAP
£000

464,789
(323,924)

140,865
(102,465)

38,400

IFRS
£000

464,789
(323,924)

140,865
(101,941)

38,924

(59)

(381)

(440)

38,341
(11,975)

26,366

143
237

380

38,484
(11,738)

26,746

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

103

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

32 EXPLANATION OF TRANSITION TO IFRS – GROUP – CONTINUED

Reconciliation of equity

Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Deferred tax assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Assets classified as held for sale

1 January 2004
Effect of
transition 
to IFRS 
£000

(2,612)
–
6,232

IFRS
£000

61,624
13,210
7,458

31 December 2004
Effect of 
transition
to IFRS
£000

UK
GAAP
£000

75,256
13,964
1,390

(3,502)
82
6,777

IFRS
£000

71,754
14,046
8,167

3,620

82,292

90,610

3,357

93,967

–
260
–
(892)

73,889
73,137
32,336
150

79,692
85,293
37,747
3,975

–
257
–
(3,772)

79,692
85,550
37,747
203

UK
GAAP
£000

64,236
13,210
1,226

78,672

73,889
72,877
32,336
1,042

180,144

(632)

179,512

206,707

(3,515)

203,192

Total assets

258,816

2,988

261,804

297,317

(158)

297,159

Current liabilities
Short term borrowings
Current portion of long term 

borrowings

Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
Tax payable

(2,045)

–

(2,045)

(279)

–

(279)

(499)
(135,209)
–
(9,625)

–
11,658
–
–

(499)
(123,551)
–
(9,625)

(1,124)
(156,046)
–
(11,053)

–
14,018
(722)
–

(1,124)
(142,028)
(722)
(11,053)

(147,378)

11,658

(135,720)

(168,502)

13,296

(155,206)

104 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

32 EXPLANATION OF TRANSITION TO IFRS – GROUP – CONTINUED

1 January 2004
Effect of
transition 
to IFRS 
£000

UK
GAAP
£000

IFRS
£000

31 December 2004
Effect of 
transition
to IFRS
£000

UK
GAAP
£000

IFRS
£000

(1,175)
(375)
(1,628)

–
(14,166)
(442)

(1,175)
(14,541)
(2,070)

(738)
(451)
(758)

–
(17,192)
(454)

(738)
(17,643)
(1,212)

(3,178)

(14,608)

(17,786)

(1,947)

(17,646)

(19,593)

(150,556)

(2,950)

(153,506)

(170,449)

(4,350)

(174,799)

108,260

38

108,298

126,868

(4,508)

122,360

4,213
49,061
2,844
52,142

-
-
(2,844)
2,882

4,213
49,061
-
55,024

4,306
51,731
6,615
64,216

–
–
(6,615)
2,107

4,306
51,731
–
66,323

Non-current assets
Other interest-bearing 
loans and borrowings

Employee benefits
Deferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity attributable to 

equity holders of the parent 
Share capital
Share premium
Revaluation reserve
Retained earnings

Total equity 

108,260

38

108,298

126,868

(4,508)

122,360

Notes
Removal of property revaluation
As a result of opting to restate land and buildings back to their depreciated historical cost, property reported as a non-current asset has
reduced because the revaluation surplus has been eliminated and depreciation charged in the twelve month periods has also decreased.

Goodwill amortisation
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the acquired subsidiary
undertakings at the date of acquisition and is included on the balance sheet as a non-current asset. Under UK GAAP, goodwill was
amortised on a straight line basis over a period of 20 years representing the estimated useful economic life. This changes under IFRS
as goodwill is not amortised but tested at least annually for impairment. Goodwill is then held in the balance sheet at cost less any
accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill amortised in the twelve month periods under UK GAAP has therefore been reversed and the
amount reported under non-current assets is now subject to an annual impairment review.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

105

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

32 EXPLANATION OF TRANSITION TO IFRS – GROUP – CONTINUED

Non-current assets held for sale
Under IFRS, a non-current asset held for sale must, at the balance sheet date, be available for immediate sale in its present condition
and the sale must be highly probable and expected to be completed within one year. As a result, some of the properties that were
previously shown as assets held for resale within current assets under UK GAAP have been reclassified to property, plant and equipment
under non-current assets. These properties had a net book value of £623,000 at 1 January 2004 and £4,302,000 at 31 December 2004.
IFRS 5 has been adopted early and hence reflected at 31 December 2004.

Share based payments
Under UK GAAP, the expense of granting employee share options was the difference between the exercise price and market price at the
date the option was granted.

Under IFRS, the expense is based upon the fair value of the option, as spread over the vesting period and adjusted for non-market
conditions. The fair value of the share options granted after 7 November 2002 is calculated using an appropriate pricing model and the
expense is recognised in the consolidated income statement.

The charge for the group has been calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In accordance with the transitional
provisions of IFRS 2, no income statement expense has been recorded in respect of grants of share options made prior to 7 November
2002. There is no impact to net assets or distributable reserves as a result of this adjustment which is credited directly to equity.

Retirement benefit obligations
Under UK GAAP, the cost of the group’s defined benefit plan was reported by reference to SSAP 24 and further disclosures were
provided in accordance with FRS 17. These two standards have now been replaced by IAS 19.

Cumulative actuarial gains and losses have been recognised within equity as at 1 January 2004 in respect of the group’s defined
benefit plans as per the transitional exemption allowed by IFRS 1. This gives rise to a defined benefit scheme plan of £14,541,000 
at 1 January 2004 and a liability of £18,365,000 at 31 December 2004.

Deferred tax
Under UK GAAP, with the exception of permanent differences, deferred tax should be recognised on all timing differences that have
originated but not reversed by the balance sheet date. Non-reversing permanent differences fall outside the scope of deferred tax.

Under IFRS, deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of
assets and liabilities and their carrying value in the financial statements. Deferred tax is recognised in the consolidated income
statement except if it relates to an item that is recognised directly in equity, in which case it is dealt with in the consolidated
statement of changes in equity.

The group’s transitional balance sheet at 1 January 2004 includes additional deferred tax assets and liabilities amounting to
£6,232,000 and £442,000 respectively. The deferred tax assets principally relate to the tax provided on the defined benefit plan
liability and the need to provide for the tax on the gains arising on share based payments. The additional deferred tax liabilities occur
because of depreciating properties, acquired as part of a business combination, which are not eligible for tax relief.

The consolidated income statement for the twelve month period ended 31 December 2004 contains an additional deferred tax credit of
£237,000 because of the tax effects associated with the amortisation of intangibles assets and the recognition of additional costs
relating to the defined benefit plan.

106 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

32 EXPLANATION OF TRANSITION TO IFRS – GROUP – CONTINUED

Events after balance sheet date
Under UK GAAP, equity dividends were recognised in the year to which they related and were an adjustable post balance sheet event.

Under IFRS, final equity dividends proposed by the board are recognised only when approved by the shareholders at the AGM. Interim
dividends are recognised when paid or when they are approved by the shareholders. Dividends are shown as a movement in equity and
not on the face of the consolidated income statement.

Property leases
Under IFRS, property leases should be divided into two components with land and buildings considered as separate elements. Land is
normally classified as an operating lease unless title passes to the lessee at the end of the lease term. The building is classified as an
operating or finance lease by applying classification criteria in IAS 17 – Leases.

At 1 January 2004, one property has been reclassified. Land amounting to £300,000 has been treated as an operating lease and has
been transferred from property, plant and equipment under non-current assets and shown within other current assets in current assets.
The value attributed to the land is being amortised over the life of the lease term and recognised in the consolidated income
statement and, in the twelve month period to 31 December 2004, gives rise to an additional charge of £3,000.

There are no other material differences between the cash flow statement presented under IFRS and the cash flow statement presented
under UK GAAP.

Cash flow
There are no material differences between the cash flow statement for the group presented under IFRS and the cash flow statement
presented under UK GAAP.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

107

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

32 EXPLANATION OF TRANSITION TO IFRS – COMPANY

Reconciliation of equity

Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Investments in subsidiary 

undertakings

Deferred tax assets

Current assets
Trade and other receivables
Amounts due from subsidiary 

undertakings

Cash and cash equivalents
Assets classified as held for sale

1 January 2004
Effect of
transition 
to IFRS 
£000

UK
GAAP
£000

IFRS
£000

31 December 2004
Effect of 
transition
to IFRS
£000

UK
GAAP
£000

IFRS
£000

50,365

(2,612)

47,753

61,802

(3,502)

58,300

90,112
–

41
4,608

90,153
4,608

94,614
285

96
5,419

94,710
5,704

140,477

2,037

142,514

156,701

2,013

158,714

1,825

47,682
6,875
1,042

257

2,082

2,421

257

2,678

(18,342)
–
(892)

29,340
6,875
150

49,574
5,473
3,975

(24,411)
–
(3,772)

25,163
5,473
203

57,424

(18,977)

38,447

61,443

(27,926)

33,517

Total assets

197,901

(16,940)

180,961

218,144

(25,913)

192,231

Current liabilities
Other interest-bearing loans and

borrowings

Amount due to subsidiary

undertakings

Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
Tax payable

(393)

–

(393)

(430)

–

(430)

(915)
(14,757)
–
(3,805)

–
11,658
–
–

(915)
(3,100)
–
(3,805)

–
(19,350)
–
(4,841)

–
14,019
(722)
–

–
(5,331)
(722)
(4,841)

(19,870)

11,658

(8,212)

(24,621)

13,297

(11,324)

108 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notes to the Financial Statements continued

32 EXPLANATION OF TRANSITION TO IFRS – COMPANY – CONTINUED

1 January 2004
Effect of
transition 
to IFRS 
£000

UK
GAAP
£000

IFRS
£000

31 December 2004
Effect of 
transition
to IFRS
£000

UK
GAAP
£000

IFRS
£000

(1,168)

(49,766)
–
(903)

–

(1,168)

(738)

–

(738)

–
(14,166)
(394)

(49,766)
(14,166)
(1,297)

(48,930)
–
–

–
(17,192)
(96)

(48,930)
(17,192)
(96)

(51,837)

(14,560)

(66,397)

(49,668)

(17,288)

(66,956)

(71,707)

(2,902)

(74,609)

(74,289)

(3,991)

(78,280)

126,194

(19,842)

106,352

143,855

(29,904)

113,951

4,213
49,061
20,578
2,844
49,498

–
–
–
(2,844)
(16,998)

4,213
49,061
20,578
–
32,500

4,306
51,731
20,578
6,615
60,625

–
–

(6,615)
(23,289)

4,306
51,731
20,578
–
37,336

126,194

(19,842)

106,352

143,855

(29,904)

113,951

Non-current liabilities
Other interest-bearing loans 

and borrowings

Amounts due to subsidiary 

undertakings
Employee benefits
Deferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity attributable to 

equity holders of the parent 

Share capital
Share premium
Special reserve
Revaluation reserve
Retained earnings

Total equity

Notes
The IFRS adjustments relating to the company are in principal the same as those affecting the group. Therefore, the explanations given
above for the group are the same for the company with the exception of the following:

Goodwill amortisation
There is no corresponding adjustment in the company.

Events after the balance sheet date
Under UK GAAP, equity dividends receivable from subsidiary undertakings were recognised in the year and were an adjustable post
balance sheet event. Under IFRS, equity dividends are only recognised when the cash has been received from subsidiary undertakings.
Dividends are shown as a movement in equity.

Cash flow
There are no material differences between the cash flow statement for the company presented under IFRS and the cash flow statement
prepared under UK GAAP.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

109

Principal Trading Subsidiaries

* HFD Limited 
* MCD Group Limited 

Lethem-Vergeer BV 
DFA SA 
* Belcolor AG 

Place of
incorporation

Great Britain
Great Britain

Netherlands
France
Switzerland

All of these subsidiaries are wholly owned and are principally engaged as a distributor of floorcoverings and associated products.

* These subsidiaries are owned directly by Headlam Group plc. The investment in subsidiary undertakings comprises ordinary share capital and loans.

110

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Financial Record

Trading results
Revenue

Operating profit before goodwill amortisation
Goodwill amortisation

Operating profit
Loss on sale of land and buildings
(Loss)/profit on disposal of discontinued operations

Profit before net financing costs
Net financing costs

Profit on ordinary activities before tax
Taxation

(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities after taxation
Dividends

(Loss)/profit for the year

Proposed dividend per share

Earnings per share

Net assets

Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Deferred tax assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

Non-current assets classified as held for sale

Total assets

Current liabilities
Bank overdraft
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
Income tax payable

Non-current liabilities
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Employee benefits
Other payables
Deferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

2001
£000

2002
£000

2003
£000

2004
£000

2005
£000

434,122

395,723

412,295

464,789

486,653

32,111
(783)

31,328
(434)
(18,811)

12,083
(3,403)

8,680
(9,188)

(508)
(9,558)

(10,066)

11.40p

23.3p

37,913
12,741
—

50,654

70,742
74,163
44,464

189,369

7,025

247,048

(1,695)
(25,914)
(120,622)
—
(5,572)

30,362
(825)

29,537
—
861

30,398
(521)

29,877
(9,335)

20,542
(10,550)

9,992

12.55p

24.4p

44,607
13,767
—

58,374

66,951
67,605
35,522

170,078

6,591

235,043

(635)
(3,342)
(123,805)
—
(7,505)

33,514
(835)

32,679
—
—

32,679
(86)

32,593
(10,464)

22,129
(11,657)

10,472

13.85p

27.3p

64,236
13,210
—

77,446

73,889
72,877
32,336

179,102

1,042

257,590

(216)
(2,328)
(135,209)
—
(9,625)

38,924
—

38,924
—
—

38,924
(440)

38,484
(11,738)

26,746
—

26,746

16.25p

31.3p

71,754
14,046
8,167

93,967

79,692
85,550
37,747

41,498
—

41,498
—
—

41,498
(658)

40,840
(12,352)

28,488
—

28,488

18.0p

33.1p

74,640
13,210
8,199

96,049

91,160
84,275
36,193

202,989

211,628

203

3,471

297,159

311,148

(279)
(1,124)
(142,028)
(722)
(11,053)

—
(471)
(141,529)
(1,080)
(11,139)

(153,803)

(135,287)

(147,378)

(155,206)

(154,219)

(4,498)
—
(107)
(375)

(4,980)

(1,670)
—
(379)
(297)

(2,346)

(1,175)
—
(375)
(402)

(1,952)

(738)
(17,643)
—
(1,212)

(19,593)

(267)
(19,432)
—
(1,403)

(21,102)

(158,783)

(137,633)

(149,330)

(174,799)

(175,321)

88,265

97,410

108,260

122,360

135,827

The earnings per share for the years 2001 to 2003 is calculated by reference to operating profit before goodwill amortisation and exceptional items.

The information relating to the years 2001 to 2003 has not been restated for IFRS.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

111

Notice of Annual General Meeting

Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of Headlam Group plc will be held at the group’s distribution facility
located at Gorsey Lane, Coleshill, Birmingham, B46 1LW on Thursday 1 June 2006 at 10.00 a.m. for the following purposes.

As ordinary business

1 To receive, consider and adopt the report of the directors and the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005,

together with the auditors’ report.

2 To declare a final dividend.

3 To re-elect as a director Graham Waldron who retires in accordance with the Articles of Association and is eligible for re-election.

Graham Waldron has attained the age of 75, being born on 16 April 1930, therefore this resolution authorising his re-election as a
director for a period of twelve months expires at the conclusion of the next AGM.

4 To re-elect as a director Tony Brewer who retires in accordance with the Articles of Association and is eligible for re-election.

5 To elect as a director, Dick Peters who, following his appointment on 1 December 2005, retires in accordance with the Articles of

Association and is eligible for election.

6 To elect as a director, Mike O’Leary who, following his appointment on 10 March 2006, retires in accordance with the Articles of

Association and is eligible for election.

7 To re-appoint KPMG Audit Plc as auditors of the company until the conclusion of the next AGM.

8 To authorise the directors to agree the remuneration of the independent auditors of the company.

9 That the Remuneration Report set out on pages 38 to 44 of the Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 December 2005 be

approved.

As special business

As special business, to consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolutions, which will be proposed as to resolution 10 as an
Ordinary Resolution and as to resolutions 11 to 14 as Special Resolutions:

10 THAT, subject to and in accordance with Article 18 of the Articles of Association of the Company, the Directors be generally and

unconditionally authorised in accordance with section 80 of the Companies Act 1985 (the “Act”) (in substitution for any existing
authority to allot relevant securities) to exercise all the powers of the Company to allot relevant securities (within the meaning of
section 80 of the Act) up to a maximum nominal amount of £216,790, provided that such authority shall expire on 30 September
2007, or such earlier time as this authority shall next be revoked or varied by the Company in general meeting, but so that the
Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or agreement which would or might require relevant securities to be allotted after
such expiry, and the Directors may allot relevant securities in pursuance of such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred by
this resolution had not expired.

11 THAT, subject to the passing of resolution 10 as set out in the notice of this meeting, the directors be empowered pursuant to

section 95 of the Companies Act 1985 (the “Act”) (in substitution for any existing authority to allot equity securities) to allot equity
securities (as defined in section 94 of the Act) for cash pursuant to the general authority conferred by resolution 10 as set out in the
notice of this meeting and to sell relevant shares (as defined in section 94 of the Act) held by the company as treasury shares (as

112

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notice of Annual General Meeting continued

defined in section 162A of the Act) for cash, as if section 89(1) of the Act did not apply to such allotment or sale, provided that
this power shall be limited to allotments of equity securities and the sale of treasury shares:

(a) in connection with or pursuant to an offer by way of rights, open offer or other pre-emptive offer to the holders of shares in
the company and other persons entitled to participate therein in proportion (as nearly as practicable) to their respective
holdings, subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the directors may consider necessary or expedient to deal with
fractional entitlements or legal or practical problems under the laws of any territory or the regulations or requirements of any
regulatory authority or any stock exchange in any territory; and

(b) otherwise than pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above, up to an aggregate nominal amount of £216,790; and such power shall

expire on 30 September 2007, or such earlier time as this authority shall next be revoked or varied by the company in general
meeting, but so that the company may, before such expiry, make an offer or agreement which would or might require equity
securities to be allotted or treasury shares to be sold after such expiry, and the directors may allot equity securities or sell
treasury shares in pursuance of such offer or agreement as if the power conferred by this resolution had not expired.

12 THAT the company be generally and unconditionally authorised, pursuant to Article 12.2 of the Articles of Association of the

company and pursuant to section 166 of the Companies Act 1985 (the “Act”), to make market purchases (as defined in section 163
of the Act) of up to 13,007,600 ordinary shares of 5p each in the capital of the company (“Ordinary Shares”) on such terms and in
such manner as the directors of the company may from time to time determine, provided that:

(a) the amount paid for each Ordinary Share (exclusive of expenses) shall not be more than five per cent above the average of the
middle market quotation for an Ordinary Share as derived from the Daily Official List of London Stock Exchange plc for the five
business days before the date on which the contract for the purchase is made and, in any event, not less than 20p per
Ordinary Share; and

(b) the authority herein contained shall expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting of the company to be held in 2007

or on 30 September 2007, whichever is earlier, provided that the company may, before such expiry, make a contract to
purchase its own shares which would or might be executed wholly or partly after such expiry, and the company may make a
purchase of its own shares in pursuance of such contract as if the authority hereby conferred hereby had not expired.

13 That, with effect from the passing of the resolution Article 98 of the Articles of Association of the company be amended such that

the aggregate sum of fees payable to non-executive directors in respect of any year be increased by £50,000 to £200,000.

14 That the Articles of Association of the company be amended by the deletion of Article 184 and the insertion of a new Article 184

as follows:

‘‘184. (A) Without prejudice to any indemnity to which he may otherwise be entitled, every person who is or was a director,
secretary or other relevant officer of the company shall be indemnified and kept indemnified out of the company’s assets against
all liability incurred by him as such or as a director, secretary or relevant officer of an associated company:

(a) in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in respect of alleged negligence, default, breach of duty, breach of
trust or otherwise in relation to the company or an associated company or its or their affairs, in which judgement is given
in his favour or in which he is acquitted or in defending or settling any such proceedings which are otherwise disposed of
on terms previously agreed with the board or on terms otherwise approved by the board without a finding or admission of
negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust on his part; or

(b) in connection with any application under the statutes in which relief is granted to him by the court provided that this

article shall not grant, or entitle any such person to, indemnification to the extent that it would cause this article, or any
part of it, to be void under the statutes

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

113

Notice of Annual General Meeting continued

(B) Without prejudice to any indemnity to which he may otherwise be entitled (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any
indemnity under or pursuant to these articles) and to the extent permitted by the statutes, the board shall have power in the
name and on behalf of the company to:

(a) grant on such terms as it sees fit any person who is or was a director, secretary or other relevant officer of the company an

indemnity or indemnities out of the assets of the company in respect of any liability incurred by him as such or as a
director, secretary or relevant officer of an associated company and to amend, vary or extend the terms of any such
indemnity so granted, again on such terms as the board sees fit; and/or

(b) enter into and amend, vary or extend such arrangements as it sees fit:

(i) to provide any person who is or was a director, secretary or other relevant officer of the company with funds to meet
expenditure incurred or to be incurred by him in defending any criminal or civil proceedings brought against him as
such or as a director, secretary or relevant officer of an associated company or in connection with any application for
relief under the statutes; or

(ii) to enable any such person to avoid incurring any such expenditure 

(C) For the purposes of this article 184: 

(a) a ‘‘relevant officer’’ is any officer of the company or an associated company (other than in either case any person (whether

or not an officer of the company or an associated company) engaged by the company or an associated company as
auditor);

(b ‘‘associated company’’ has the meaning given to that term in section 309A of the Act; and
(c) a director shall be entitled to vote and to be counted in the quorum at any meeting of the board or a committee of the
board at which any indemnity, arrangement or proposal falling within any of the provisions of Articles 184 is to be
considered and, for the purposes of article 120, any interest which any director may have in such indemnity, arrangement
or proposal shall not be a material interest unless the terms of such indemnity, arrangement or proposal confer upon such
director a privilege or benefit not generally available to, or awarded to, any other director. The decision of the chairman of
the meeting as to whether the indemnity, arrangement or proposal to be considered at the meeting falls within the
provisions of Articles 184 or as to the materiality of any director’s interest therein for the purposes of this article and
article 120 shall be final and conclusive’’

To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolution which will be proposed as an ordinary resolution:

By order of the board

Geoff Duggan
Company Secretary
10 April 2006

Registered Office:-
PO Box 1
Gorsey Lane
Coleshill
Birmingham
B46 1LW

114

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Notice of Annual General Meeting continued

Notes

1 Any member entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting is entitled to appoint one or more proxies (who need not
be a member of the company) to attend and, on a poll, to vote instead of the member. A form of proxy for use by members at the
meeting is enclosed. Completion and return of a form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending and voting at the
meeting in person, should he subsequently decide to do so. In accordance with regulation 34 of the Uncertified Securities
Regulations 1995, the company has determined that only those members whose names are entered in the register of members at
10 a.m. on 30 May 2006 shall be entitled to attend and vote at the meeting.

2 In order to be valid, any form of proxy and power of attorney or other authority under which it is signed, or a notarially certified
or office copy of such power or authority must reach the Company’s Registrars, Capita Registrars of The Registry, 34 Beckenham
Road, Beckenham, Kent, BR3 4TU not less than 48 hours before the time of the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 

3 CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies by utilising the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may do so for

the meeting to be held on 1 June 2006 and any adjournment(s) thereof by utilising the procedures described in the CREST Manual.
CREST personal members or other CREST sponsored members, and those CREST members who have appointed (a) voting service
provider(s), should refer to their CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s), who will be able to take the appropriate action on
their behalf.

In order for a proxy appointment made by means of CREST to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a “CREST Proxy
Instruction”) must be properly authenticated in accordance with CRESTCo’s specifications and must contain the information
required for such instructions, as described in the CREST Manual. The message must be transmitted so as to be received by the
issuer’s agent (ID RAIO) by the latest time for receipt of proxy appointments specified in note 2 above. For this purpose, the time
of receipt will be taken to be the time (as determined by the timestamp applied to the message by the CREST Applications Host)
from which the issuer’s agent is able to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the manner prescribed by CREST. 

CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service providers should note that CRESTCo does not make
available special procedures in CREST for any particular messages. Normal system timings and limitations will, therefore, apply in
relation to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the responsibility of the CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST
member is a CREST personal member or sponsored member or has appointed (a) voting service provider(s), to procure that his
CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s) take(s)) such action as shall be necessary to ensure that a message is transmitted by
means of the CREST system by any particular time. In this connection, CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors
or voting service providers are referred, in particular, to those sections of the CREST Manual concerning practical limitations of the
CREST system and timings. 

The company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy Instruction in the circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of the
Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001. 

4 As permitted by Regulation 41 of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001, shareholders who hold shares in uncertificated

form must be entered on the company’s share register at 6.00 p.m. on 30 May 2006 in order to be entitled to attend and vote at
the Annual General Meeting. Such shareholders may only cast votes in respect of shares held at such time. Changes to entries on
the relevant register after that time shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend or vote at the meeting.

5 Copies of the directors’ service contracts and, where appropriate, letters of appointment, a summary of the directors’ transactions
in the company’s shares during the year and written terms of reference for each of the remuneration, audit and nomination
committees will be available for inspection at the registered office of the company during normal business hours on any
weekday (Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays excluded) from the date of this notice until the close of business on the
business day preceding the AGM and will also be available for inspection for at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting and
throughout the meeting. There are no service agreements between any director and any subsidiary of the company.

Accounts

Headlam Group plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2005

115

Notice of Annual General Meeting continued

Notes - continued

6 Biographical details of each director who is being proposed for re-appointment or re-election by shareholders, including their
membership of board committees, are set out in the annual report and accounts posted to shareholders at the same time as 
this notice.

Explanatory Notes:

Ordinary Business

Section 241A of the Companies Act 1985 requires quoted companies, at each general meeting at which statutory accounts are to
be laid, to propose an ordinary resolution approving the directors’ remuneration report for the year. Resolution 9 will be
proposed as an ordinary resolution for this purpose; a copy of the report is included in the annual report and accounts posted to
shareholders at the same time as this notice.

Explanation of Special Business

The Companies Act 1985 provides that directors shall only allot unissued shares with the authority of shareholders in general
meeting. Resolution 10 will be proposed as an Ordinary Resolution for the renewal of the directors’ general authority to issue
relevant securities up to an aggregate nominal amount of £216,790, representing approximately 5% of the current issued share
capital of the company. The directors have no present intention of exercising this authority. 

The Companies Act 1985 also provides that any allotment of new shares for cash must be made pro rata to individual
shareholders’ holdings, unless such provisions are disapplied under section 95 of the Companies Act 1985. Resolution 11 will be
proposed as a special resolution for the renewal of the directors’ authority to allot equity securities for cash, without first
offering them to shareholders pro rata to their holdings. This authority facilitates issues made by way of rights to shareholders
which are not strictly in accordance with section 89 of the Companies Act, and authorises other allotments of up to a maximum
aggregate nominal amount of £216,790 of shares, representing approximately 5% of the current issued share capital of the
company. This authority also allows the directors, within the same aggregate limit, to sell for cash shares that may be held by
the company in treasury. 
The directors have no present intention of exercising this authority.

Resolution 12 will be proposed as a special resolution for the renewal of the company’s authority to purchase its own shares in
the market for up to 13,007,600 Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 5% of the issued share capital of the company. The
price payable shall not be more than 5% above the average price of the middle market quotation as derived from the Daily Official
List of London Stock Exchange plc for the Ordinary Shares for the five business days before the purchase is made and in any
event not less than 5p per share, being the nominal value of the shares. It is the directors’ intention only to exercise the
authority to purchase the company’s shares where it would increase the earnings per share of those Ordinary Shares that are not
re-purchased. This power will only be used if the directors consider that to do so would be in the best interests of shareholders
generally.

116 Headlam Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2005

Shareholder helpline
Headlam’s shareholder register is maintained by Capita Registrars (“Capita”), who are responsible for making dividend payments and
updating the register, including details of changes to shareholders’ addresses and purchases or sales of Headlam shares. If you have a
question about your shareholding in Headlam you should contact: Capita Registrars, Northern House, Woodsome Park, Fenay Bridge,
Huddersfield, HD8 0LA, telephone +44 (0)870 1623131, email: shareholder.services@capitaregistrars.com

Frequent shareholder enquires
If you change your address
Please notify Capita in writing. If shares are held in joint names, the notification must be signed by the first-named shareholder.

If you change your name
Please notify Capita in writing and enclose a copy of any marriage certificate or change of name deed as evidence.

Lost Headlam share certificate
If your share certificate is lost or stolen, you should call Capita immediately. A letter of indemnity will be sent to you to sign. Capita
will charge for this service.

Duplicate shareholder accounts
If you receive more than one copy of Headlam communications you may have your shares registered inadvertently in at last two
accounts. This happens when the registration details of separate transactions differ slightly. If you wish to consolidate such multiple
accounts, call Capita to request the accounts are consolidated.

Buying and selling shares in the UK
If you wish to trade in Headlam shares, you can do so at Capita’s website, www.capitadeal.com or alternatively use a stockbroker or
high street bank which trades on the London Stock Exchange. There are many telephone and online services available. If you are
selling, you will need to present your share certificate at the time of sale.

Transferring Headlam shares
Transferring shares to someone else requires the completion of a stock transfer form. This form, and details of the procedure you need
to follow, is available from Capita website. Stamp duty is not normally payable if the transfer is to a relative or if there is no money
being paid in exchange for the shares.

Share prices information
Shareholders can find share prices listed in most national newspapers. Ceefax and Teletext pages also display share prices that are
updated regularly throughout the trading day. For a real-time buying or selling price, you should contact a stockbroker. Additionally
there is a link to the London Stock Exchange on the Headlam website.

The Headlam website
The Headlam website at www.headlam.com provides news and details of the company’s activities, plus information on the share price.
The investor information section of the website contains up-to-date information for shareholders including the company’s latest results
and key dates such as dividend payment dates.

ShareGift
ShareGift, the charity share donation scheme, is a free service for shareholders wishing to give shares to charitable causes. 
It may be especially useful for those who wish to dispose of a small parcel of shares which would cost more to sell than they are
worth. There are no capital gains tax implications (i.e. no gain or loss) on gifts of shares to charity and it is also possible to obtain
income tax relief. Further information can be obtained at www.sharegift.org

The Unclaimed Assets Register
The Unclaimed Assets Register is a unique search service that helps individuals to find their lost assets and re-establish contact with
financial institutions. It has a database of unclaimed life policies, pensions, unit trust holdings, and share dividends drawn from many
companies and can search for lost assets and entitlements. The Unclaimed Assets Register charges a small fixed fee for each search,
10% of which goes to charity. For further information, visit www.uar.co.uk

Designed and produced by corporateprm, Edinburgh and London. www.corporateprm.co.uk

Registered office
Headlam Group plc
PO Box 1
Gorsey Lane
Coleshill
Birmingham
B46 1LW

Website
www.headlam.com
E-mail
headlamgroup@headlam.com

Registration
Registered in England and Wales
Number 460129