Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Industrial Materials / Iluka Resources Limited / FY2007 Annual Report

Iluka Resources Limited
Annual Report 2007

ILU · ASX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker ILU
Exchange ASX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Industrial Materials
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2007 Annual Report · Iluka Resources Limited
Loading PDF…
ILUKA Annual Report 2007

I
l
u
k
a
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s

L
i
m

i
t
e
d

A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

2
0
0
7

A
B
N
3
4
0
0
8
6
7
5
0
1
8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s
t
n
e
t
n
o
c

Directors’ Report 

Remuneration Report 

Financial Report 

Corporate Governance 

Leadership Team 

Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources 

Sustainable Development 

Corporate Information 

1

8

20

87

93

95

99

107

Explanation of Structure of Annual Report Documents 

 Notice of Annual General Meeting

The 2007 Annual Report provides shareholders with detailed 
information in relation to the fi nancial statements, Directors’ 
Report (including remuneration report), Mineral Resources and Ore 
Reserves and sustainable development.  The Annual Shareholder 
Review provides a summary of Iluka’s 2007 fi nancial year and is 
available on Iluka’s website, www.iluka.com.

The 53rd Annual General Meeting of Iluka Resources Limited will 
be held at the Argyle Ballroom at the Parmelia Hilton Hotel, 14 Mill 
Street, Perth, Western Australia on Wednesday 21 May 2008.

A separate Notice of Meeting and Proxy Form have been sent to 
registered shareholders.

Australian currency is shown in this Report unless otherwise 
indicated.

Iluka Resources Limited, ABN 34 008 675 018
Level 23, 140 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000
GPO Box U1988, Perth WA 6845
Telephone  + 61 8 9360 4700 
Facsimile  + 61 8 9360 4777
Website 

www.iluka.com

t
r
o
p
e
R

’
s
r
o
t
c
e
r
i
D

The Directors present their report on the consolidated 
entity consisting of Iluka Resources Limited and the 
entities it controlled at the end of, or during, the year 
ended 31 December 2007.

Directors

The following individuals were Directors of Iluka 
Resources Limited during the whole of the fi nancial year 
and up to the date of this report:

Ian Colin Robert Mackenzie (Chairman)
Robert Lindsay Every (Deputy Chairman effective 
11 December 2007)
Grahame David Campbell
Valerie Anne Davies
Donald Marshall Morley
George John Pizzey
Gavin John Rezos
David Alexander Robb

Principal Activities

The activities of the consolidated entity consist of the 
exploration, mining, concentration and separation of 
mineral sands, production of ilmenite, rutile, synthetic 
rutile and other titaniferous concentrates, zircon and 
coal and sales of these products throughout the world.

Signifi cant Changes

There were no signifi cant changes in the state of affairs 
of the Group during the fi nancial year.

Review of Operations

Financial Commentary

Section I – Overview

Reported Earnings

Iluka recorded a net profi t after tax and minority 
interests (NPAT) for the year ended 31 December 2007 of 
$51.1 million, compared with $21.0 million for the prior 
year (or $116.9 million before Signifi cant Items).

Mineral Sands EBIT, excluding the signifi cant items 
incurred in 2006, decreased by $50.4 million to $86.1 

million.  Mineral Sands EBITDA reduced by $26.7 million 
to $230.6 million, despite an initial contribution of $36.6 
million from the Murray Basin.  Earnings were impacted 
adversely by the higher Australian dollar exchange rate, 
reduced sales volumes of higher value products and an 
increased proportion of production in Western Australia 
being from the newer higher cost ore bodies.

The average A$/US$ spot exchange rate for 2007 was 
83.90 cents compared with 75.35 cents for 2006.  The 
negative impact on NPAT from Australian sourced sales 
was $46.1 million for the full year, including $28.6 million 
in the second half.  Lower sales volumes also impacted 
profi ts, mitigated in part by price increases during 2007 
of approximately 5 per cent.

Iluka’s interest in the Narama Coal joint venture has 
been classifi ed as a discontinued operation, with the sale 
completed on 15 January 2008.  Narama’s contribution 
to NPAT was $10.9 million (2006: $9.4 million).

Earnings per share (EPS) for 2007 were 21.6 cents 
(2006: 9.1 cents).  

Cash Flow

Cash fl ow from operations of $95.5 million was 33 per 
cent lower than in 2006 due to lower sales revenues and 
increased production costs following commissioning of 
the Murray Basin.  Capital expenditure at $118.2 million, 
was $54.5 million lower than in 2006 due mainly to lower 
expenditure for the Murray Basin project.  Overall capital 
expenditure for the Murray Basin and Eucla projects was 
$34.3 million compared to $64.0 million in 2006.

Dividend

In the context of current Group earnings, cash fl ows and 
the franking credit position, together with the capital 
required to develop Jacinth-Ambrosia and Murray Basin 
2, the Board decided not to pay a 2007 fi nal dividend.  
The economics of both projects are attractive and the 
Board believes that, at this stage, capital expenditure for 
these projects is the most appropriate use of available 
funds.

Gearing

Gearing (net debt/net debt + equity) was 44.3 per cent 
at 31 December 2007, compared with 45.4 per cent at 
31 December 2006 and 45.0 per cent at 30 June 2007. 
Net debt at 31 December 2007 of $598.1 million was 
$1.6 million higher than at 31 December 2006 and $10.4 
million lower than at 30 June 2007.

Iluka Resources Limited 

1

 
Section II – Income Statement Analysis 

The composition of the company’s 2007 results is summarised in 
Table 1 below, followed by a narrative of each line item.

prices achieved for all products and increased rutile sales from 
Murray Basin production.  Revenue from Florida/Georgia was 
$12.9 million lower in 2007 following the cessation of mining in 
2006, with 2007 operations comprising only a tails retreatment 
programme. 

Table 1: Group Profi t and Loss Summary – $million

Other Income

This represents profi t from the sale of rehabilitated land in the 
South West of Western Australia.

Cash Costs of Production

The decrease is due mainly to the reduction in costs in Florida/ 
Georgia following the closure of mining operations in 2006 offset 
by 2007 being the fi rst full year of production in the Murray Basin 
following the commissioning of the Hamilton Mineral Separation 
Plant in January 2007 and the commencement of mining 
operations in March 2006.  Cash costs of production in Florida/ 
Georgia decreased by $38.8 million to $10.6 million. Cash costs of 
production in the Murray Basin increased by $30.0 million to $64.6 
million.

Inventory Movement

The increase is mainly due to higher fi nished product inventories 
in the Mid West and Murray Basin.  The higher volumes on 
hand compared to the prior year refl ect some shipment delays 
associated with continuing diffi culties experienced by some 
customers in sourcing acceptable vessels, as well as Iluka’s own 
supply management considerations.

Marketing, Exploration and Technical Cash Costs

These comprise sales and marketing expenses, including 
Government royalties, exploration expenses and technical support 
costs.  The total includes $10.3 million (2006: $7.2 million) in 
respect of greenfi elds exploration and project expenses not 
associated with existing operations.

Depreciation and Amortisation

The increase is attributable to the commencement of production in 
the Murray Basin (increase of $10.7 million) and higher charges in 
Western Australia ($13.9 million) due mainly to mining operations 
being at shorter life ore bodies such as Cloverdale and Waroona 
where depreciation of mine establishment costs is higher than that 
associated with longer life ore bodies at other operations.

2007 

2006 

Variance

Sales Revenue  
Less: Hedging 
Other Income 
Cash Costs of Production 
Inventory Movement 
Marketing, Exploration and 
Technical Costs 

Mineral Sands EBITDA 
Depreciation and Amortisation 

Mineral Sands EBIT 
(excluding Signifi cant Items) 
Hedging  
Mining Area C 
Other Earnings  
Corporate 
Signifi cant Items 

Total EBIT  
Net Interest Costs 
Interest Capitalisation 
Other Financing Costs  

Profi t Before Tax 
Tax Expense 
Profi t from discontinued 
operation (Narama Coal) 
Minority Interests 

Net Profi t After Tax 

Mineral Sands EBIT

897.9 
(34.0) 
10.6 
(654.0) 
61.8 

(51.7) 

230.6 
(144.5) 

86.1 
34.0 
19.5 
3.6 
(19.5) 
- 

123.7 
(41.8) 
- 
(16.9) 

65.0 
(15.5) 

10.9 
(9.3) 

51.1 

962.1 
(28.9) 
- 
(670.9) 
49.6 

(54.6) 

257.3 
(120.8) 

136.5 
28.9 
18.7 
1.2 
(25.6) 
(87.1) 

72.6 
(40.5) 
13.5 
(13.4) 

32.2 
(10.1) 

9.4 
(10.5) 

21.0 

(64.2)
(5.1)
10.6
16.9
12.2 

2.9

(26.7)
(23.7)

(50.4)
5.1
0.8
2.4
6.1
87.1

51.1
(1.3)
(13.5)
(3.5)

32.8
(5.4)

1.5
1.2

30.1

Mineral Sands EBIT of $86.1 million was $50.4 million lower than 
in 2006, after adjusting for $99.6 million of mineral sands charges 
reported as signifi cant items in 2006.  An analysis of the individual 
businesses is contained in Section V, Operational Overview, with 
overall group commentary provided below.

Sales Revenue

Sales revenue includes $87.2 million in respect of Murray Basin, 
following the fi rst shipment from the Port of Portland in March 
2007. The reduced sales revenue related to lower volumes of 
zircon and synthetic rutile sales and the appreciation of the 
Australian dollar which more than offset the increased US dollar 

2

Annual Report 2007

 
Hedging

Other Financing Costs 

The $34.0 million gain from currency hedging, which is included in 
sales revenue, was $5.1 million higher than in 2006 due to a higher 
volume of hedge contracts.  $26.6 million of the gain relates to 
Iluka currency contracts which were closed in August 2006.  The 
contribution from CRL hedge benefi ts increased to $7.4 million 
(2006: $4.3 million) due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar.

Mining Area C

The EBIT contribution in 2007 refl ects lower one-off capacity 
payments ($2.0 million in 2007 compared to $3.0 million in 2006) 
which were offset by an increase in the ongoing iron ore royalty 
associated with higher US dollar denominated iron ore prices and 
increased sales tonnages.

Other Earnings

The main component of Other Earnings in 2007 was the fi nal New 
South Wales coal compensation receipts of $2.0 million that were 
received and recognised in the fi rst half.  There were no signifi cant 
components of Other Earnings in 2006.

These are primarily the unwind of the discount associated with the 
restoration and closure cost provisions which increased by $3.6 
million from 2006.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense of $15.5 million at an effective tax rate of 24% 
(2006: $10.1 million at 31%) increased due to higher earnings.  The 
effective tax rate is lower than the prevailing corporate tax rate 
of 30% due primarily to the concessional tax treatment of eligible 
research and development expenditure and the lower tax rates 
applicable in the United States.  The effective tax rate for 2006 was 
high as not all of the tax benefi ts of the US related signifi cant items 
were recognised.  The income tax expense relating to the earnings 
from Narama Coal forms part of the profi t from discontinued 
operations.

Discontinued Operation - Narama Coal 

The increased after tax contribution of $10.9 million (2006: 
$9.4 million) refl ects lower depreciation charges following the 
classifi cation of the operation as discontinued.

Corporate

These costs have reduced by 24 per cent compared with 2006 as a 
result of an increased focus on the appropriate nature and extent 
of corporate overhead costs in 2007 and a $1.1 million reduction in 
foreign exchange losses.

Minority Interests

Lower profi ts attributable to minority interests of $9.3 million 
(2006: $10.5 million) relate to a lower NPAT for Consolidated Rutile 
Ltd (Iluka 51.04%) and Ashton Coal (Iluka 93.3%).

Signifi cant Items

Section III – Outlook and Earnings Guidance

The signifi cant items in 2006 related to impairment charges in the 
South West of Western Australia ($60.0 million), additional iron 
oxide rehabilitation provisions ($25.0 million), closure costs, asset 
impairments and profi t on land sales in Florida/Georgia ($10.0 
million), coal compensation income of $12.5 million and other asset 
write-offs of $4.6 million.

Net Interest Costs

Interest costs (net of interest income) increased to $41.8 million 
(2006: $40.5 million).  Net debt at 31 December 2007 of $598.1 
million was $1.6 million higher than at the previous year end.  

Interest Capitalisation

Interest capitalisation associated with the development of the 
Murray Basin project ceased in December 2006 prior to the 
commissioning of the Mineral Separation Plant.

Iluka has previously advised the company is undergoing a 
transitional period until the commencement of Murray Basin Stage 
2 in 2009 and the Jacinth-Ambrosia project in the Eucla basin in 
mid 2010.  2008 full year guidance is based on the usual caveats 
for forward-looking statements.

The company provides NPAT guidance for 2008 in the range of $10 
million to $20 million, including the after tax proceeds from the 
Narama sale of approximately $30 million.  This guidance is based 
on the following factors:

• 

• 

Achievement of planned sales in 2008, particularly in the 
fi nal quarter of the year.  In 2007 approximately 12 per cent 
of annual sales revenue was associated with sales in the 
last month of the year, and

An average A$/US$ spot exchange rate of 90.00 cents for 
2008 (compared with 83.90 cents in 2007).

Iluka Resources Limited 

3

David Alexander Robb, BSc, GradDip (Personnel 
Administration), FAIM, FAICD (Managing Director)

Mr Robb (53) commenced as Managing Director on 18 October 
2006. Mr Robb was previously Managing Director, Wesfarmers 
Energy as well as Executive Director, Wesfarmers Limited.  Prior to 
joining Wesfarmers he held senior positions with British Petroleum 
in Australia and overseas, including chief executive responsibilities 
for a national service business in the US; for oil, chemicals, 
consumer goods, marine and aviation businesses in Malaysia and 
as Director responsible for oil marketing throughout South East 
Asia.  Mr Robb is Chairman of Consolidated Rutile Limited.

Other current directorships of listed companies: Consolidated 
Rutile Limited (October 2006 to present).  Former directorships of 
listed companies in the last three years: Wesfarmers Limited (July 
2004 to September 2006).

Grahame David Campbell, BE, MEng Sc, HON FIE Aust, 
FAICD, CP Eng

Mr Campbell (64) was appointed to the Board in December 1998. 
He has extensive experience in the mining and construction 
industries and is a past president of both the Association of 
Consulting Engineers (Australia) and the Australian Pipeline 
Industry Association. He is a Director of the Macro Engineering 
Council and Worley Parsons Limited. Mr Campbell is a member of 
the Audit and Risk Committee.

Other current directorships of listed companies: Worley Parsons 
Limited (November 2002 to present).  Former directorships of 
listed companies in the last three years: None.

Valerie Anne Davies, FAICD

Ms Davies (56) was appointed to the Board in July 1997. She 
is Principal of One.2.One Communications Pty Limited and a 
Director of Tourism Australia and HBF Health Funds Inc. Previous 
directorships include Gold Corporation, TAB (WA), ScreenWest, 
Relationships Australia and Integrated Group Limited.   Ms Davies 
has also been a member of the Boards of Management of the Asia 
Research Centre (Murdoch University) and Fremantle Hospital 
and Health Service.  She is a Councillor of the WA Division of the 
Australian Institute of Company Directors and a past recipient of 
the Telstra “WA Business Woman of the Year” award. Ms Davies is 
Chairperson of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee.

Other current directorships of listed companies: None.  Former 
directorships of listed companies in the last three years: 
Integrated Group Limited (August 1999 to June 2007).

NPAT sensitivity to currency movement, assuming current hedging, 
is expected to be approximately -$3 million NPAT for every one cent 
movement above 90 cents and +$6 million NPAT for every one 
cent movement between 90 cents and 82 cents and +$3 million 
NPAT for every one cent movement below 82 cents.

Please refer to Iluka’s Investment Presentation (released to the 
ASX 21 February 2008) for further details on factors infl uencing 
the company’s profi tability as well as other details.

Directors’ Profi les

Ian Colin Robert Mackenzie, BSc, BCom, MBA, FAICD 
(Chairman)

Mr Mackenzie (65) was appointed to the Board in July 1999. He 
is Chairman of the Bank of Western Australia Limited (BankWest) 
and HBOS Australia Pty Limited.  Mr Mackenzie was previously 
Managing Director of Romatex Limited, Managing Director 
and Chief Executive Offi cer of Bunnings Limited and Executive 
Chairman of Wesfi  Limited. Mr Mackenzie is a member of both the 
Remuneration and Nomination Committee and the Audit and Risk 
Committee.  Mr Mackenzie has indicated his intention to retire as a 
Director at the Company’s May 2008 Annual General Meeting.

Other current directorships of listed companies: None. Former 
directorships of listed companies in the last three years: Bank of 
Western Australia Limited (December 1994 to present - no longer 
listed).

Robert Lindsay Every, BSc, PhD, FTSE, FIE Aust, CP Eng, FAICD 
(Deputy Chairman)

Dr Every (62) was appointed to the Board in March 2004. He 
is Deputy Chairman and is expected to assume the position 
of Chairman following the retirement of Mr Mackenzie at the 
May 2008 Annual General Meeting.  Dr Every is a Director of 
Wesfarmers Limited and Boral Limited.  Dr Every was formerly the 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Offi cer of OneSteel Limited, 
a position from which he retired in May 2005.  He was also the 
Chairman of the New Zealand based listed company Steel and Tube 
Holdings Limited and Managing Director of Tubemakers of Australia 
Limited and President of BHP Steel Limited.  He was formerly a 
Director of Sims Group Limited.  Dr Every is a member of the Audit 
and Risk Committee.

Other current directorships of listed companies: Wesfarmers 
Limited (February 2006 to present), Boral Limited (September 2007 
to present).  Former directorships of listed companies in the last 
three years: Sims Group Limited (October 2005 to June 2007), 
OneSteel Limited (July 2000 to May 2005).

4

Annual Report 2007

Donald Marshall Morley, BSc, MBA, FAusIMM

Gavin John Rezos, BA, LLB, BJURIS, MAICD

Mr Morley (68) was appointed to the Board in December 2002. He 
was formerly the Chief Financial Offi cer and a Director of WMC 
Limited from which he retired in October 2002. He is Chairman of 
Alumina Limited and a Director of Spark Infrastructure Limited. Mr 
Morley is Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee.

Other current directorships of listed companies: Alumina Limited 
(December 2002 to present), Spark Infrastructure Limited 
(December 2005 to present).  Former directorships of listed 
companies in the last three years: None.

George John Pizzey, BE(Chem), Fell Dip (Management), FAIM, 
FAICD, FTSE

Mr Pizzey (62) was appointed to the Board in November 2005. He 
has extensive experience in mining and mineral processing. Mr 
Pizzey was Chairman of Alcoa of Australia and held a number of 
senior executive positions with Alcoa Inc (USA). He is a Director 
of Alumina Limited, Amcor Limited, St Vincent’s Medical Research 
Institute and Ivanhoe Grammar School. He was formerly the 
Chairman of ION Limited (in administration), Range River Gold 
Limited and the London Metal Exchange UK and a Director of WMC 
Resources Limited. Mr Pizzey is a member of the Remuneration 
and Nomination Committee.

Other current directorships of listed companies: Alumina Limited 
(June 2007 to present),  Amcor Limited (November 2003 to 
present).  Former directorships of listed companies in the last 
three years: Range River Gold Limited (June 2004 to April 2006), 
ION Limited (Administrator Appointed) (December 1999 to August 
2005), WMC Resources Limited (November 2003 to June 2005).

Mr Rezos (46) was appointed to the Board in June 2006. He 
has extensive Australian and international investment banking 
experience and is a former Investment Banking Director of the 
HSBC Group with regional roles during his HSBC career based 
in London, Sydney and Dubai.  Mr Rezos has held Chief Executive 
Offi cer positions and executive directorships of companies in the 
healthcare and technology areas in the UK, US and Singapore and 
was formerly a non-executive Director of Amity Oil NL (Antares).  
He is a Principal of Albion Capital Partners.  Mr Rezos is a member 
of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee.

Other current directorships of listed companies: None. Former 
directorships of listed companies in the last three years: Antares 
Energy Limited (formerly Amity Oil NL) (October 2001 to November 
2004), pSivida Limited (December 2000 to July 2006).

Company Secretary

The Company Secretary is Mr Cameron Wilson LLB.  Mr Wilson was 
appointed to the position of Company Secretary in 2004.  Before 
joining Iluka Mr Wilson held a range of legal and commercial roles 
at WMC Resources Limited and prior to that worked as a solicitor 
with a major legal practice.

Meetings of Directors

The numbers of meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors and 
of each Board Committee held during the year ended 31 December 
2007, and the numbers of meetings attended by each Director 
were:

Board of  
Directors’ meetings 

Audit and Risk 
Committee meetings 

Remuneration & Nomination
Committee meetings

 Number 
attended 

Number 
held 

Number 
attended 

Number 
held 

Number 
attended 

Number
held

10 

10 

10 

9 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

6 

6 

6 

- 

6 

6 

- 

- 

6 

6 

6 

- 

6 

6 

- 

- 

4 

4 

- 

4 

- 

- 

4 

4 

4

4

-

4

-

-

4

4

Director 

I C R Mackenzie 

D A Robb  

G D Campbell 

V A Davies 

R L Every  

D M Morley 

G J Pizzey 

G J Rezos  

Iluka Resources Limited 

5

 
 
 
Directors’ shareholding

Non-audit services

Directors’ shareholding is set out on page 14 of the Financial 
Report.

Remuneration Report

A remuneration report is set out on pages 8 to 18.  

Indemnifi cation and insurance of offi cers

The Company indemnifi es all Directors of the Company named 
in this report and current and former executive offi cers of the 
Company and its controlled entities against all liabilities to persons 
(other than the Company or a related body corporate) which 
arise out of the performance of their normal duties as Director or 
executive offi cer unless the liability relates to conduct involving 
bad faith.  The Company also has a policy to indemnify the Directors 
and executive offi cers against all costs and expenses incurred in 
defending an action that falls within the scope of the indemnity and 
any resulting payments. 

During the year the Company has paid a premium in respect of 
Directors’ and executive offi cers’ insurance.  The contract contains 
a prohibition on disclosure of the amount of the premium and the 
nature of the liabilities under the policy.

The Company may decide to employ the auditor on assignments 
additional to their statutory audit duties where the auditor’s 
expertise and experience with the Company and/or the 
consolidated entity are important.

Details of the amounts paid or payable to the auditor 
(PricewaterhouseCoopers) for audit and non-audit services 
provided during the year are set out below.

The Board of Directors has considered the position and, in 
accordance with the advice received from the Audit and Risk 
Committee, is satisfi ed that the provision of the non-audit services 
is compatible with the general standard of independence for 
auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001.  The Directors are 
satisfi ed that the provision of non-audit services by the auditor, 
as set out below, did not compromise the auditor independence 
requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following 
reasons:

• 

• 

fees paid to external auditors for non-audit services for the 
2007 year were below the limits prescribed by the Company 
policy; and

none of the services undermine the general principles 
relating to auditor independence as set out in APES 110 
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.

A copy of the auditors’ independence declaration as required under 
section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on page 19.

During the year the following fees were paid or payable for 
services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related 
practices and non-related audit fi rms:

Consolidated

(a)  Assurance services - Refer to Note 34

PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian fi rm:

Audit and review of fi nancial reports and other audit work under the Corporations Act 2001 

Related practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian fi rm 

Total remuneration for assurance services  

(b)  Taxation services

PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian fi rm:

Tax compliance services, including review of company income tax returns 

Related practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian fi rm 

Total remuneration for taxation services  

2007 
$ 

832,494 

60,400 

892,894 

21,000 

33,360 

54,360 

2006
$

755,020

63,000

818,020

71,220

9,333

80,553

6

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
Environmental regulations

Rounding of amounts

The Company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 98/0100, 
issued by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 
relating to the ‘rounding off’ of amounts in the Directors’ Report.  
Amounts in the Directors’ Report have been rounded off in 
accordance with that Class Order to the nearest hundred thousand 
dollars, or in certain cases, to the nearest dollar.

This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the 
Directors.

I C R Mackenzie
Chairman

Perth
12 March 2008

The Company’s Australian operations are subject to various 
Commonwealth and State laws governing the protection of 
the environment in areas such as air and water quality, waste 
emission and disposal, environmental impact assessments, 
mine rehabilitation and access to, and use of, ground water.  In 
particular, some operations are required to be licensed to conduct 
certain activities under the environmental protection legislation 
of the state in which they operate and such licenses include 
requirements specifi c to the subject site.

So far as the Directors are aware, there have been no material 
breaches of the Company’s licenses and all mining and exploration 
activities have been undertaken in compliance with the relevant 
environmental regulations.

Matters subsequent to the end of the 
fi nancial year

On 21 February 2008, the Company announced an intention to 
raise capital in the region of $350 million through a renounceable 
pro-rata entitlement offer. Detailed work on the fi nal structure 
and timing of this equity raising continues at the time of signing 
this report. Also on 21 February 2008, the Company indicated that 
it was well progressed in securing a single, enlarged corporate 
debt facility to replace and extend the maturities of certain of its 
existing facilities. The company has since executed a new $500 
million debt facility package comprising a Syndicated Term Loan 
Facility of $445 million and a Working Capital Facility of $55 million.

Except for the matters referred to above, the Directors are 
not aware of any other matter or circumstance not otherwise 
dealt with in the Directors’ Report that has or may signifi cantly 
affect the operations of the economic entity, the results of 
those operations or the state of affairs of the economic entity in 
subsequent fi nancial years.

Iluka Resources Limited 

7

)
d
e
t
i
d
u
A
(

t
r
o
p
e
R
n
o
i
t
a
r
e
n
u
m
e
R

Board Oversight of Remuneration – 
Remuneration and Nomination Committee

The Remuneration and Nomination Committee 
(Committee) operates in accordance with its charter as 
approved by the Board.  The Committee is comprised 
solely of independent non-executive Directors and was 
chaired by Ms Davies in 2007.  The Committee met 
four times in 2007, with all members of the Committee 
present at every meeting.

The Committee’s responsibility is to provide assistance 
and recommendations to the Board in support of the 
company’s objective of creating and delivering value for 
shareholders and in fulfi lling its corporate governance 
responsibilities relating to the following:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

overall remuneration strategy of the company, 
its development, review and implementation;

remuneration of executives, the Managing 
Director and non-executive Directors;

performance of the Managing Director and key 
executives; 

succession planning for key roles; and

assessment, composition and succession of the 
Board.

The Committee has the resources and authority 
appropriate to discharge its duties and responsibilities, 
including the authority to engage external professionals 
on terms it determines appropriate, without seeking the 
approval of the Board or management.  During the 2007 
year, the external advisers provided input on several 
matters relating to remuneration.  These advisers were:

• 

• 

• 

Ernst and Young, who provided advice in relation 
to the Iluka employee share plan;

Hay Group, who provided advice on staff and 
executive remuneration; and

Egan Associates, who provided remuneration 
advice in respect to the Managing Director and 
non-executive Directors.

In 2007, the Remuneration and Nomination Committee 
conducted a review of its charter and an evaluation of 
its performance. 

The remuneration policies and practices of CRL, 
a subsidiary of Iluka and a company listed on the 
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), are developed by 
the CRL Board and not by the Board or Remuneration 
and Nomination Committee of Iluka.  Information on 
these arrangements is available in the CRL Annual 
Report.

Remuneration Principles

Iluka’s performance is dependent on the quality of its 
employees and the alignment of their activities and 
performance with Iluka’s business objective – to create 
and deliver shareholder value.  Accordingly, Iluka’s 
remuneration policy is designed to attract, retain and 
motivate experienced executives and to ensure the 
focus of executives on shareholder value creation and 
delivery.  This policy is based on the following principles:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

alignment of executive and shareholder interests 
is supported by executive share ownership;

executives should be focused on both short and 
long term business performance;

the company’s need to attract and retain key 
executive talent;

executive rewards must be competitive within 
the sector in which Iluka operates;

an appropriate balance should be maintained 
between fi xed and variable components of 
executive remuneration; and

all aspects of executive remuneration should 
be transparent in terms of disclosure, comply 
with relevant legislative requirements and take 
account of market practice.

The remuneration of an executive or manager for 
performance is therefore linked to both annual business 
performance outcomes and to the company’s ability to 
generate competitive levels of shareholder value, as 
defi ned by Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and Return on 
Equity (ROE), on a longer term basis.

8

Annual Report 2007

 
 
A share purchased at the prevailing market price of $4.60 on 1 
January 2003 has since generated $0.98 in shareholder returns 
over the subsequent fi ve year period (a 21.3% return). This return 
has comprised aggregate dividend returns of $0.98 with nil share 
price growth over the period to 31 December 2007.  Over the 
corresponding fi ve year period, average executive total fi xed 
remuneration (for roles existing throughout that period) increased 
by 31 per cent.

Remuneration Structure

This Remuneration Report discloses remuneration details for the 
Managing Director, non-executive Directors and Key Management 
Personnel of the company and group in 2007.

Remuneration for executives comprises two components:

• 

• 

total fi xed remuneration (TFR) which is made up of base 
salary and superannuation, together with other salary 
sacrifi ce items such as novated leases and car parking.  
Employees are required to meet any fringe benefi ts tax 
obligations applicable to benefi ts; and

variable remuneration which is linked directly to 
performance of both the company and the individual 
executive and as such is deemed to be “at risk”.

The remuneration structure is designed to refl ect an appropriate 
balance between fi xed and variable remuneration to ensure that 
executive reward is aligned with the performance outcomes of the 
business. 

Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR)

In February 2007, Iluka adopted the Hay Job Evaluation 
methodology for job sizing to strengthen internal relativities and 
adopt a strong alignment to Hay Group remuneration practices and 
external markets.  Under the new structure, the company positions 
TFR at median levels of the market as defi ned by a comparator 
group of Australian companies within the resources market, 
as well as referencing job evaluation data and the individual 
competence levels of executives.  Allowance is also made for the 
highly competitive nature of the market for talent in the resources 
sector. 

Superannuation Benefi ts

Iluka has appropriate superannuation and pension arrangements 
in countries where it operates. In Australia the company 
contributes superannuation at the minimum required rate to each 
executive’s nominated eligible fund.  Individuals may elect to make 
further voluntary contributions from pre-tax salary.

All Australian based executives are entitled to contribute to the 
Iluka Superannuation Plan.  The plan is administered by ING 
Australia Limited as part of a master trust and over 90 per cent of 
employees are members.  The plan is primarily an accumulation 
style plan. A small number of employees have retained membership 
in a defi ned benefi t sub-plan, a legacy from the 1999 merger of 
Westralian Sands Limited with RGC Limited.  The defi ned benefi t 
sub-plan is closed to new members.  All executives (the executives 
detailed on page 16) participate in the Iluka Superannuation Plan 
on an accumulation basis.  

Variable Remuneration

Performance and Incentives

The current performance and incentive arrangements were 
introduced for the 2007 performance year.  The incentive 
arrangements comprise a Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP) and 
a Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). The distinct plans balance the 
short and long term aspects of business performance, refl ect 
market practice and support business needs.  

The incentive arrangements ensure a strong alignment between 
the incentive arrangements of executives and the creation and 
delivery of shareholder value and support Iluka’s aim of attracting, 
retaining and motivating experienced executives. 

The STIP and LTIP operate within the existing rules of the 
Directors, Executives and Employees Share Acquisition Plan 
(DEESAP), as approved by the shareholders at the company’s 
Annual General Meeting in May 1999.

At target levels of performance, the STIP represents two-thirds of 
potential variable remuneration, and the LTIP represents one-third.

Only nominated managers and executives participate in the STIP 
and LTIP.  The level of award opportunity is determined by an 
individual’s role within the business and capacity to impact the 
results of the company. In 2008, it is anticipated that approximately 
89 employees (including all executives) will participate in the LTIP, 
and approximately 160 employees (including all executives) will 
participate in the STIP.

Iluka Resources Limited 

9

Objectives, measures and targets for both the STIP and the LTIP 
are set on an annual basis and are subject to the approval of the 
Board. 

The target incentive opportunity for key executives under the STIP 
is 60 per cent of TFR and under the LTIP is 30 per cent of TFR.  At 
stretch levels of performance the incentive opportunity under the 
STIP increases to 90 per cent.

The Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP)

The STIP aims to provide incentive to executives whilst also 
promoting equity ownership, providing awards partly in cash and 
partly in deferred equity.

The STIP is linked to group and regional fi nancial and operational 
performance and has a focus on return on capital (ROC) as a 
key metric.  A combination of fi nancial and non-fi nancial targets, 
including safety and individual targets, are used to measure 
performance and determine outcome. Each metric refl ects the 
organisational unit within which the individual is located (for 
example, regional versus corporate roles) and is measured 
independently.  

The measures and weighting of objectives for the 2008 
performance year are:

• 

• 

Profi tability (ROC, EBIT and NPAT) 

Sustainability (all injury frequency rate,  
severity rate and notifi cations 
to government)

60 per cent

10 per cent

• 

Growth (individual objectives) 

30 per cent

The weighting of the growth measure is targeted at 30 per cent, 
however the Board (on the recommendation of the Managing 
Director) has discretion at any time to vary the growth weighting 
within a range from 20 per cent to 40 per cent.

The measures and weighting of objectives for the 2007 
performance year varied for the key management personnel as 
shown below:

•  

•  

Profi tability (ROC, EBIT and NPAT) 

60 or 70 per cent

Sustainability (all injury frequency rate,  
severity rate and notifi cations 
to government)

10 per cent

•  

Growth (individual objectives) 

20 or 30 per cent

10

Annual Report 2007

The STIP requires profi tability and sustainability performance 
exceeding 90 per cent of target before any award is payable for 
these measures.  Growth objectives are set at stretch levels 
and are linked to the achievement of key business growth and 
improvement outcomes.

The STIP award is determined after the year-end based on an 
assessment of the extent to which the individual’s objectives have 
been achieved. Outcomes are subject to rigorous one-up manager 
assessment and, for the Managing Director and key executives, by 
the Board. 

Half of the STIP award is to be paid in cash and half on a deferred 
basis in the form of restricted shares.  Fifty per cent of the 
restricted shares are subject to a time-based vesting period of one 
year after the end of the performance period. The remaining 50 per 
cent is subject to a time-based vesting period of two years after 
the end of the performance period. 

The process for determining the number of restricted shares to be 
awarded to each participant is determined by dividing the dollar 
value of the deferral component by the Volume Weighted Average 
Price (VWAP) of Iluka shares traded on the ASX over the fi ve 
trading days following release of the company’s full year results.

The deferred amount supports executive focus on both annual and 
multi-year performance, as well as providing a tangible retention 
factor.

To encourage executives to increase their shareholdings, voluntary 
deferral of up to 100 per cent of the STIP award is available.

At the time of the assessment of the 2007 STIP the Board 
exercised its discretion to re-weight the growth measure to 40 per 
cent for all Australian participants.  The additional value of the re-
weighted component was awarded in the form of restricted shares 
which will vest on 1 January 2009.

The Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

The LTIP provides a grant of equity in the form of share rights that 
vest after three years subject to performance over a three year 
period.  

The grant is split into two separate tranches, with one tranche (50 
per cent) being assessed based on return on equity (ROE) relative 
to an internal target and the other (50 per cent) based on Total 
Shareholder Return (TSR) performance relative to a comparator 
group consisting of companies which comprise the Materials 
Index and the ASX Mid Cap 50 Index at the commencement of the 
performance period (excluding property trusts and duplication). 
The two performance measures are applied as follows:

Return on Equity (ROE) tranche:

The ROE tranche of the LTIP grant vests based on a prospective 
three year ROE performance measure.  Half of the tranche vests 
for threshold performance with 100 per cent of the tranche vesting 
for achievement of target.  Vesting occurs on a straight-line basis 
for performance between threshold and target. Targets are set 
giving consideration to: 

• 

• 

• 

prior ROE performance history; 

planned strategic and business plan activity throughout the 
performance period; and 

comparable company performance. 

Total Shareholder Return (TSR) tranche:

The TSR tranche of the LTIP grant vests based on TSR relative to 
a peer group of companies. The comparator group consists of the 
companies which comprise the Materials Index and the ASX Mid 
Cap 50 Index at the commencement of the performance period 
(excluding property trusts and duplication).  This comparator 
group was chosen to provide a combination of companies from 
Iluka’s defi ned industry sector and companies of a similar 
market capitalisation to Iluka. The combined group also ensures 
a suffi ciently large peer group for performance measurement, 
and provides less likelihood of TSR performance being skewed to 
specifi c sub industry sectors or specifi c stocks.

Fifty per cent of the TSR tranche vests if Iluka ranks at the 50th 
percentile of the comparator group, with 100 per cent vesting at 
the 75th percentile of the comparator group. Vesting occurs on 
a straight-line basis for performance between the 50th and 75th 
percentile of the comparator group.

All offers (including plans vested in the 2007 year) and details 
of the maximum allocation for the Managing Director and key 
executives are shown on page 14.  It should be noted that 
the maximum allocations listed are subject to the respective 
performance criteria.  If at the end of the performance period 
the performance criteria have not been met there will be no 
entitlement to shares.

Previous Performance Incentive Programs: 
2005 and 2006

During 2005 and 2006 Iluka operated the Performance Incentive 
Program (PIP) which has since been superseded by the STIP and 
LTIP plans introduced in 2007.  

In February 2006, the Board approved a number of refi nements to 
the PIP following its fi rst year of operation. 

For participating executives, 50 per cent of any award made was 
in the form of cash and the balance was required to be deferred in 
the form of share rights.  Only nominated managers and executives 
participated in the PIP.  The level of potential award opportunity 

was determined by an individual’s role within the business 
and capacity to impact the results of the company.  In 2006, 39 
employees participated in the cash and equity form of PIP, with a 
further 75 staff nominated for the cash only form of the plan.

The following table sets out the maximum incentive opportunity for 
2005 and 2006:

                                                    Maximum incentive award (% of TFR) 
 Managing Director
Executives 

2005 performance year 

2006 performance year 

80% 

90% 

125% 

125% 

The size of incentive award was determined at year-end based on 
an assessment of the extent to which the individual’s objectives 
had been achieved. 

The PIP provided for an ‘at risk’ element of remuneration requiring 
the attainment of annually set, pre-determined objectives and 
targets. Objectives were both fi nancial and non-fi nancial and 
were developed individually for participating staff.  Performance 
objectives related to fi nancial (NPAT & ROE), environmental, health 
and safety performance, business improvement projects and 
specifi c targets within the executive’s functional responsibilities.  
Individual objectives were required to align directly with the 
company’s strategic plan and annual budgets. The weighting of 
fi nancial and non-fi nancial measures were as follows:

(% of award)

Financial  Environmental and  Key individual

health and safety 

objectives

2005 performance year 

2006 performance year 

35% 

50% 

10-15% 

10-15% 

50-55% 

35-40% 

Each measure and objective had robust targets defi ned at 
threshold (minimum level of performance required), target 
(performance as budgeted) and stretch (superior performance 
– maximum level of award).  Objectives, measures and targets set 
in 2006 were subject to the approval of the Board, and applicable 
to both the cash and equity components of the plan. 

Outcomes of PIP objectives were subject to a rigorous one up 
assessment and, for the Managing Director and key executives, by 
the Board.

In 2005 and 2006, threshold achievement required a 90 per 
cent achievement of the target or budgeted performance of the 
company and paid 45 per cent of the apportioned award.  Target 
achievement required meeting 100 per cent of this criterion and 
paid 65 per cent of the apportioned award.  Stretch achievement 
required a 120 per cent performance against this criterion, 
and paid 100 per cent of the apportioned award.  There was no 
additional payment applicable to the executive above stretch, 
nor was any award payable below threshold level of fi nancial 
achievement. 

Iluka Resources Limited 

11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For both the 2005 and 2006 plans, the fi nancial and non-fi nancial 
objectives and measures were the only criteria required for 
determining the share entitlements of executives.

a one up manager approval process applies with fi nal Managing 
Director authority prior to any award or remuneration review being 
implemented.

For the 2005 PIP, at the end of the performance period in 
December 2005, performance criteria were assessed for each 
executive and an incentive award determined based on the level of 
achievement. Half of the incentive award was paid in cash in March 
2006.  Executives receive the remaining half of the award as rights 
to fully paid shares in annual instalments of 25 per cent over four 
years.  Further, a four year holding period applies to each grant of 
shares.  The fi rst tranche of the 2005 PIP vested in January 2007.  

For the 2006 PIP, at the end of the performance period in 
December 2006, performance criteria were assessed for each 
executive and an incentive award determined based on the level of 
achievement. Half of the incentive award was paid in cash in March 
2007.   Executives receive the remaining half as rights to fully paid 
shares over three years in one third instalments which commenced 
in January 2007. The four year holding period on vested Share 
Rights applicable in the 2005 year was replaced by a 50 per cent 
minimum holding requirement once all shares have vested in the 
2006 plan.  Once share rights vest, the awarded shares will be 
purchased on the open market.

Securities Trading 

Iluka’s policy in relation to employees holding Iluka securities is 
set out in the Company’s Securities Trading Policy, which can be 
found on the Company’s website at www.iluka.com.   The policy 
sets out the circumstances in which employees may trade in 
company securities, and thereby seeks to ensure employees do not 
breach the laws concerning insider trading.

Remuneration Review

The company conducts a review of the remuneration of 
executives and staff on an annual basis.  Guidelines for reviews 
are considered by the Board following recommendation by 
the Remuneration and Nomination Committee in February of 
each year.  Review guidelines are based upon the outcomes 
of direct and related market review data and external advice 
from the company’s remuneration advisers.  All employees and 
executives participate in a performance review process which is 
used in conjunction with market data to determine appropriate 
remuneration recommendations.

Individual progress against objectives is reviewed throughout the 
performance year with formal reviews occurring at half year and at 
the conclusion of the performance year.

Recommendations by the Managing Director for STIP and LTIP 
award outcomes and remuneration for key executives are 
submitted to the Remuneration and Nomination Committee in 
February of each year.  In respect of all other eligible participants, 

12

Annual Report 2007

Employee Share Plan 

The company also operates an employee share plan under the 
rules of the Iluka Resources Limited Employee Share Plan.  The 
Board may, from time to time, at its discretion, make written offers 
to participate in the plan.  

In 2007, Iluka introduced an employee ‘gift’ share plan (Gift Plan).  
Under the terms of the Gift Plan, offers were made to eligible 
employees (permanent employees with a minimum of twelve 
months service) in Australia and the United States to receive 
shares to the value of A$1,000.  

To satisfy the legislative requirements of both Australia and the 
United States, Australian employees received the shares under 
a tax-exempt plan, with a three year sale restriction period (a 
holding lock can be applied during the restriction period).  As 
US employees do not have access to a tax exemption plan, they 
were offered a gift of free shares up to A$1,000 through a grant 
of restricted shares.  The shares will be held under the plan rules 
with a restriction period of three years.  To enable US employees to 
receive a tax deferral, strict forfeiture conditions apply.

Of the 762 Australian employees eligible to participate, 608 (80 
per cent) accepted the offer.  In the US, 81 of 159 (51 per cent) 
employees participated.  Overall, a total of 689 of 921 (75 per 
cent) eligible employees accepted the Gift Plan offer at a cost of 
$609,000.

Consistent with usual industry practice, shares acquired under 
the Gift Plan are not subject to performance conditions as the 
primary objective of the plan is to encourage share ownership by 
all employees and thereby increase the alignment of employee 
attitudes and actions with shareholder value creation and delivery.

Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration

The remuneration of the non-executive Directors is determined 
by the Board on recommendation from the Remuneration and 
Nomination Committee within a maximum aggregate amount 
approved by shareholders at an Annual General Meeting.  The 
current maximum amount of non-executive Directors’ fees as 
approved by shareholders is $1.1 million.  The total amount paid in 
2007, including superannuation, was $955,852.

A review of Iluka’s non-executive Director fees was conducted 
during the year by Egan Associates.  The review took into account 
the nature of Directors’ work, their responsibilities and survey 
data on comparative companies.  As a result of this review, the 
following fees were applied from 1 July 2007:

• 

• 

Non-executive Director Fees
Board Chairman 
(inclusive of Committee fees) 
Board Member 

Board Member Committee Fees
Audit and Risk Committee Chair 
Remuneration and Nomination 
Committee Chair 
Audit and Risk Committee Member 
Remuneration and Nomination 
Committee Member 

$251,870 per annum
$95,000 per annum

$35,000 per annum

$25,000 per annum
$17,500 per annum

$12,500 per annum

The minimum required employer superannuation contribution is 
paid into each Director’s nominated eligible fund and is in addition 
to the above fees.  Based on the above fee structure, the current 
total non-executive Director remuneration is $941,870 per annum, 
excluding superannuation, or $1,026,639 including superannuation.  

David Robb - Managing Director

Non-executive Directors are able to purchase company shares 
under the DEESAP utilising the funds that would otherwise be 
payable to Directors as fees.  These shares are acquired on market 
and all transaction costs are borne by the relevant Director.  
Details of Directors’ share purchases are listed on page 14.  
No performance conditions are attached to these shares as they 
are purchased using sacrifi ced fees.

Executive Employment Agreements

Remuneration and other terms of employment for the Managing 
Director and key executives are formalised in service agreements.  
The Managing Director and key executives are employed on rolling 
agreement basis with no specifi ed fi xed terms.  The Managing 
Director and key executives are on total fi xed remuneration (TFR) 
arrangements, inclusive of superannuation.

Total Fixed Remuneration 

Short Term Incentive 

Long Term Incentive 

Share Rights 

Retention Arrangements 

Termination Arrangements
With Notice 

Without Notice 

Voluntary Termination 

Termination for  
Other Reasons 

Protection of Interests 

Weighting
50 per cent
10 per cent

$1,100,000 for the year ended 31 December 2007
$1,500,000 from 1 January 2008
90 per cent of TFR at target with up to 120 per cent of TFR for stretch performance awarded 50 per cent as cash and 
50 per cent as deferred equity
Measure 
Profi tability (ROC, EBIT, NPAT) 
Sustainability (all injury frequency rate, 
severity rate, notifi cations to government)
Growth (individual objectives) 
A grant of equity in the form of share rights of up to 30 per cent of TFR measured over of a three year performance period
Measure 
ROE 
TSR 
As disclosed in the 2006 Remuneration Report, Mr Robb purchased approximately $500,000 of Iluka shares prior to 
commencing employment which were matched with an equivalent award of share rights (71,851 shares) due to vest on 
1 July 2008.
Mr Robb was granted a further 52,970 share rights as part of the 2007 LTIP offer of which, subject to meeting performance 
criteria, part or all may vest at the conclusion of the three year period.
At the time of fi nalising this Report, the Board was in the process of developing an incentive and retention plan for the 
Managing Director. If approved by the Board the plan will be subject to shareholder approval at the upcoming Annual General 
Meeting on 21 May 2008.

Weighting
50 per cent
50 per cent

40 per cent

Employment can be terminated during the contract period by giving 12 months notice or pay in lieu of notice plus a pro-rata 
short term incentive component.  All shares to which Mr Robb is entitled under the DEESAP will vest within three months 
of termination.
In the case of misconduct and in certain other circumstances, employment can be terminated without notice and with no 
entitlement to any payment under the executive incentive plan.
Employment may be terminated by giving six months notice.  Any pro-rata award under the executive incentive plan will be at 
the discretion of the Board.
•  By Iluka on the ground of redundancy or by Mr Robb if, at the instigation of the Board, he suffers a material diminution in his 

status as Chief Executive Offi cer and Managing Director, by giving 24 months notice (if given in the fi rst three 
years of employment) or 12 months notice (thereafter) provided that Iluka may elect, or Mr Robb may require Iluka, to pay Mr 
Robb an equivalent amount of TFR in lieu of notice; or 

•  By Iluka if Mr Robb suffers illness, accident or other cause which renders him unable to perform his duties, by giving Mr Robb 

six months TFR.

•   In the circumstances described above, a termination payment equal to the total incentive target for which there would have 
been an entitlement under the executive incentive plan for the relevant year calculated on a pro-rata basis for the relevant 
notice period given by the company.

Mr Robb is restrained from engaging in certain activities during his employment, and for a period following termination of his 
employment, in order to protect Iluka’s interests. The Executive Employment Agreement contains provisions relating to the 
protection of confi dential information and intellectual property.

Iluka Resources Limited 

13

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Executive Service Agreements

Major provisions of the agreements relating to key executives included in this Remuneration Report are set out below.

Executive 

M Adams 

P Beilby 

P Benjamin 

D Calhoun 

C Cobb 

D Grant 

V Hugo 

D McMahon 

H Umlauff 

C Wilson 

Position 

Termination Notice Period 
by Iluka 

Termination Notice Period 
by Employee 

General Manager Western Region 

General Manager Murray Basin 

General Manager Exploration & Geology 

Executive General Manager People  
& Communities

Managing Director CRL 

Chief Financial Offi cer 

General Manager Sales & Marketing 

Chief Financial Offi cer 

General Manager SA Development &  
Project Management

General Manager Corporate Services & 
Company Secretary

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

Termination
Payments

9 months

9 months

12 months

12 months

12 months

12 months

12 months

12 months

12 months

12 months 

D Calhoun, D Grant and D McMahon have ceased employment with Iluka.

Share Rights and Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel

                                                            Number of Shares 
Name 

 Balance  
held at  
01/01/07 

Received on 
vesting of share  
rights during the year 

Other changes 
during 
the year 

Balance 
 held at  
31/12/07 

Balance  
held at 
01/01/07  

 Number of Share Rights
Vested as 
shares during 
2007 

Granted  
during  
2007* 

Lapsed  Balance
held at 
during 
31/12/07
 2007 

Non-Executive Directors
76,072 
G Campbell 
35,272 
V Davies 
17,540 
R Every 
42,256 
I Mackenzie 
25,000 
D Morley 
10,000 
G Pizzey 
- 
G Rezos 

Executive Director
D Robb 

70,000 

Executives
M Adams 
P Beilby 
P Benjamin 
D Calhoun 
D Grant 
V Hugo 
D McMahon 
H Umlauff 
C Wilson 

- 
11,940 
7,287 
200 
5,400 
7,510 
- 
- 
100 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

2,242 
14,364 
9,104 
27,903 
16,594 
15,322 
- 
2,423 
4,776 

9,668 
830 
710 
1,554 
1,012 
405 
40,474 

85,740 
36,102 
18,250 
43,810 
26,012 
10,405 
40,474 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

2,835 

72,835 

71,851 

52,970 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

42 
1,065 
659 
(28,103) 
(21,994) 
- 
- 
46 
- 

2,284 
27,369 
17,050 
- 
- 
22,832 
- 
2,469 
4,876 

- 
30,732 
15,436 
19,425 
36,105 
33,396 
- 
- 
16,548 

24,786 
19,316 
24,986 
28,895 
12,755 
24,197 
21,669 
32,937 
24,483 

(2,242) 
(14,364) 
(9,104) 
(27,903) 
(16,594) 
(15,322) 
- 
(2,423) 
(4,776) 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-  124,821

- 

22,554
(6,774)  28,910
(3,549)  27,769
-
(20,417) 
(32,266) 
-
(6,528)  35,743
(21,669) 
-
30,514
- 
36,255
- 

* Granted during 2007 includes the full grant of the 2006 PIP and Share Rights offered under the 2007 LTI.

The numbers of shares in the company and share rights for ordinary shares in the company are set out above for each director of Iluka 
Resources Limited and other key management personnel of the group, including their personally related entities.  There were no shares 
granted during the reporting period as compensation.

14

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Incentive opportunity for 2008 

Short-Term Incentive (Cash + Deferred Equity) 

Long-Term Incentive (Equity)1 

At Target   
90% of 
fi xed remuneration 

At Stretch  
120% of 
fi xed remuneration 

$ Value 
of maximum number of share rights 
30% of fi xed remuneration

Incentive as % of
TR at target2

$1,350,000 

$1,800,000 

$450,000 

55%

At Target   
60% of 
fi xed remuneration 

At Stretch  
90% of 
fi xed remuneration 

$ Value 
of maximum number of share rights 
30% of fi xed remuneration

 Incentive as % of
TR at target2

$264,000 
$214,200 
$254,400 
$235,800 
$339,000 
$264,000 

$396,000 
$321,300 
$381,600 
$353,700 
$508,500 
$396,000 

$132,000 
$107,100 
$127,200 
$117,900 
$169,500 
$132,000 

47%
47%
47%
47%
47%
47%

Name 

D A Robb 

Name 

M Adams 
P Beilby 
P Benjamin 
V Hugo 
H Umlauff 
C Wilson 

1.  Shows the $ value of the LTI opportunity to be granted in the form of share rights in 2008.
2.  Total Remuneration (TR) represents the annual total available earnings inclusive of fi xed remuneration plus short and long term incentives at target.  The table above shows the ‘at 

risk’ (variable) remuneration as a percentage of total remuneration.

Remuneration report disclosures

Details of Remuneration

Details of the remuneration of the directors and other Key 
Management Personnel (as defi ned in AASB 124 Related Party 
Disclosures) of Iluka Resources Limited and the Iluka Resources 
Limited Group are set out in the following tables.  Other key 
management personnel of the company and the group are the 
following executives who have authority for planning, directing and 
controlling the activities of the company and the group.

M Adams 
P Beilby 
P Benjamin 
D Calhoun1 

D Grant2 
V Hugo 
D McMahon3 
H Umlauff 

C Wilson 

General Manager, Western Region
General Manager, Murray Basin
General Manager, Exploration & Geology
Executive General Manager, People & 
Communities
Chief Financial Offi cer
General Manager, Sales & Marketing 
Chief Financial Offi cer
General Manager, South Australian 
Development & Project Management
General Manager, Corporate Services & 
Company Secretary

1 
2 
3 

D Calhoun ceased employment 30 November 2007.
D Grant ceased employment 16 February 2007.
D McMahon appointed as an Executive 29 January 2007 and ceased 
employment 17 January 2008.

For the remainder of this Note, Key Management Personnel 
other than Directors of the consolidated entity are referred to as 
‘Executives’.

The above persons were also Executives during the year ended 31 
December 2006, except:

•  

• 

•  

•  

• 

M Adams, appointed as an Executive 1 January 2007.

P Beilby, appointed as an Executive 1 January 2007.

P Benjamin, appointed as an Executive 24 May 2006.

V Hugo, appointed as an Executive 21 February 2006.

H Umlauff, appointed as an Executive 9 May 2006. 

The following persons were also Executives during the year ended 
31 December 2006:

•  

• 

• 

S Ward, ceased employment as Executive General Manager 
Sales & Marketing on 10 February 2006.

M Bourke, ceased employment as Executive General 
Manager Technical Services on 3 March 2006.

W Bisset, ceased employment as Executive General 
Manager Global Operations on 31 December 2006.

In addition, the Managing Director of Consolidated Rutile Limited, 
C Cobb, is a group executive whose remuneration must be 
disclosed under the Corporations Act 2001 as one of the fi ve 
highest remunerated executives.

Amounts in the ‘PIP cash’ column are dependent on the 
satisfaction of performance conditions as set out in the section 
headed “Performance Incentive Plan” above.  Amounts in the 
Share Based Payments column relate to the component of the fair 
value of awards from prior years made under the various incentive 
plans attributable to the year.  All other elements of remuneration 
are not directly related to performance.

Iluka Resources Limited 

15

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term employee benefi ts

Non-Monetary  Other 

Superannuation 

Termination 

2007

Name 

 Cash Salary 
 & fees1  
$ 

Non-executive Directors**
G Campbell 
V Davies 
R Every 
I Mackenzie 
D Morley 
G Pizzey 
G Rezos 

107,750 
114,000 
105,250 
225,577 
124,000 
102,750 
101,409 

STIP 
Cash 
$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

Executive Director
D Robb3 

1,009,174 

245,902 

Executives
M Adams4 
P Beilby4 
P Benjamin* 
D Calhoun5* 
D Grant6 
V Hugo 
D McMahon7* 
H Umlauff* 
C Wilson 

345,948 
274,822 
323,173 
376,853 
50,441 
317,404 
382,928 
488,991 
314,035 

32,010 
28,917 
50,738 
102,025 
- 
44,627 
- 
71,694 
52,763 

Benefi ts 
$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

- 

- 
- 
5,250 
120,803 
653 
5,250 
- 
2,634 
5,250 

$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

- 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

Share Based 
Payments2
$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

Total

$

117,448
124,260
115,341
241,109
135,160
111,998
110,536

$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

- 

354,485 

1,700,387

- 
- 
- 
454,828 
43,095 
- 
- 
- 
- 

42,934 
54,409 
56,589 
105,645 
- 
71,241 
- 
52,120 
72,717 

452,027
396,623
480,994
1,171,131
101,251
482,118
417,392
659,448
488,730

$ 

9,698 
10,260 
10,091 
15,532 
11,160 
9,248 
9,127 

90,826 

31,135 
38,475 
45,244 
10,977 
7,062 
43,596 
34,464 
44,009 
43,965 

Other Group Executive
C Cobb8* 

344,737 

203,181 

- 

48,263 

- 

- 

596,181

1.  Cash salary includes salary that is sacrifi ced for the purchase of shares during the year.
2.  Represents the estimated monetary value of shares rights under grant for the year ended 31 December 2007. The indicative valuation was determined in accordance with the 

measurement criteria of accounting standard AASB 2 Share-based payment with the fair value of shares at grant date being recognised as remuneration on a straight-line basis 
between grant date and vesting date. A negative value in share based payments arises where amounts recognised as remuneration in prior years are reversed due to employee 
forfeiture of the share rights prior to vesting.

3.  As disclosed in 2006, D Robb has elected to defer the cash component of his 2007 STIP award into Iluka shares provided for under the terms of the STIP.
4.  Appointed as an Executive 1 January 2007.
5.  Ceased employment 30 November 2007. Termination benefi t consisted of Severance $424,000 in accordance with terms of the contract of employment regarding termination plus 

payment of statutory leave entitlements $30,828. Non-monetary benefi t relates to relocation and associated FBT pursuant to terms of the contract of employment.

6.  Ceased employment 16 February 2007. Termination benefi t relates to statutory leave entitlements $43,095.
7.  Commenced employment 29 January 2007, ceased employment 17 January 2008.
8.  Remuneration and incentives arrangements for C Cobb are determined by the CRL Board of Directors. Further details can be obtained from the CRL annual report.

*   Denotes one of the 5 highest paid executives of the Group, as required to be disclosed under the Corporations Act 2001.
**   n/a denotes that Non-executive Directors are not eligible for these arrangements.

16

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
2006

Name 

Short-term employee benefi ts

 Cash Salary 
 & fees11  
$ 

PIP 
Cash12 
$ 

Non-Monetary  Other 

Superannuation 

Termination 

Non-executive Directors
W Barr1 
G Campbell 
V Davies 
R Every 
I Mackenzie 
D Morley 
G Pizzey 
G Rezos2 
R Tastula1 

Executive Director
D Robb3 
K Folwell4 

Executives
P Benjamin5 
W Bissett6* 
M Bourke7 
D Calhoun* 
D Grant* 
V Hugo8 
H Umlauff9 
S Ward10* 
C Wilson 

33,850 
96,585 
70,200 
94,000 
193,114 
45,292 
94,000 
52,068 
33,850 

206,422 
668,901 

174,884 
577,943 
53,294 
385,864 
378,308 
256,951 
273,389 
49,430 
272,089 

Benefi ts 
$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

200,000 
76,734 

- 
658,939 

54,594 
95,018 
- 
60,446 
90,945 
47,889 
51,844 
- 
50,913 

3,117 
7,810 
4,045 
- 
5,094 
4,395 
- 
562 
5,094 

$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

$ 

3,046 
8,693 
41,797 
8,460 
17,380 
74,880 
8,460 
4,686 
3,046 

18,578 
14,205 

11,597 
14,205 
6,712 
14,205 
51,327 
37,504 
23,770 
6,920 
36,681 

40,568 

Share Based 
Payments13
$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

Total

$

36,896
105,278
111,997
102,460
210,494
120,172
102,460
56,754
36,896

$ 

n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 
n/a 

- 
1,009,398 

50,871 
(273,046) 

475,871
2,155,131

- 
558,467 
287,810 
- 
- 
- 
- 
556,806 
- 

26,240 
57,182 
(97,844) 
48,925 
(4,842) 
64,938 
- 
(134,749) 
44,783 

270,432
1,310,625
254,017
509,440
520,832
411,677
349,003
478,969
409,560

- 

- 

519,601

Other Group Executive
C Cobb14* 

315,741 

163,292 

- 

1.  W Barr and R Tastula retired 11 May 2006.
2.  G Rezos appointed 20 June 2006.
3.  D Robb appointed 18 October 2006. Cash incentive of $200,000 and grant of 71,851 share rights (share based payment value of $50,871 to December 2006) made pursuant to 

terms of contract of employment in lieu of participation in 2006 Performance Incentive Plan.

4.  K Folwell ceased employment 31 August 2006. Termination benefi ts consisted of Severance $913,500 in accordance with terms of the contract of employment regarding termination 
plus payment of statutory leave entitlements $95,898. Non-monetary benefi t relates to relocation allowance and associated FBT pursuant to terms of the contract of employment 
regarding termination.

5.  P Benjamin appointed to Executive 24 May 2006.
6.  W Bissett ceased employment 31 December 2006. Termination benefi ts consisted of Severance $515,000 in accordance with terms of the contract of employment regarding 

termination plus payment of statutory leave entitlements $43,468.

7.  M Bourke ceased employment 3 March 2006.
8.  V Hugo appointed to Executive 21 February 2006.
9.  H Umlauff appointed to Executive 9 May 2006.
10.  S Ward ceased employment 10 February 2006. Termination benefi ts consisted of Severance $485,000 in accordance with terms of the contract of employment regarding termination 

plus payment of statutory leave entitlements $71,806.

11.  Cash salary includes salary that is sacrifi ced for the purchase of shares during the year.
12.  Represents incentives payable in relation to the cash component of the 2006 Performance Incentive Plan paid in March 2007.
13.  Represents the estimated monetary value of shares rights under grant for the year ended 31 December 2006. The indicative valuation was determined in accordance with the 

measurement criteria of accounting standard AASB 2 Share-based payment with the fair value of shares at grant date being recognised as remuneration on a straight-line basis 
between grant date and vesting date. A negative value in share based payments arises where amounts recognised as remuneration in prior years are reversed due to employee 
forfeiture of the share rights prior to vesting.

14.  Remuneration and incentive arrangements for C Cobb are determined by the CRL Board of Directors. Further details can be obtained from the CRL annual report.

*   Denotes one of the 5 highest paid executives of the Group, as required to be disclosed under the Corporations Act 2001.
**   n/a denotes that Non-executive Directors are not eligible for these arrangements .

Iluka Resources Limited 

17

 
 
 
 
 
 
STIP Share Rights awarded to the Managing Director and Executives 
for 2007 Performance

Name 
Directors of Iluka Resources Limited
D Robb 

Executives of Iluka Resources Limited
M Adams 
P Beilby 
P Benjamin 
D Calhoun 
D Grant 
V Hugo 
D McMahon 
H Umlauff 
C Wilson 

Vesting Date

01/01/09 

01/01/10

33,501 

33,502 

18,666 
17,446 
14,269 
- 
- 
12,311 
- 
20,037 
14,913 

4,361 
3,940 
6,913 
- 
-
6,080 
- 
9,768 
7,189

Share Based Compensation

The tables below summarise awards of Shares and Share Rights 
made under the various incentive schemes described in the 
Variable Remuneration section during the year, and those awards 
from prior years that are still to vest.

Actual awards made under previous LTI and PIP plans in 2007

 Performance Period and Plan

2004 LTI 

2006 PIP

01/01/04 - 31/12/061 

01/01/06 - 31/12/062

Name 

Number of shares 

Number of share rights

Directors of Iluka Resources Limited
D Robb 

- 

Executives of Iluka Resources Limited
M Adams 
P Beilby 
P Benjamin 
D Calhoun 
D Grant3  
V Hugo 
D McMahon4 
H Umlauff 
C Wilson  

- 
10,866 
5,693 
- 
9,641 
10,472 
- 
- 
- 

Fair Value per Share
or Share Right5 

$2.47 

-

6,728
4,581
7,651
8,478
4,251
6,717
-
7,271
7,148

$4.00

1  Grant date 1 March 2007.  Vesting date 1 March 2007, with a 10 year holding lock 

until 1 April 2017.

2  Grant date 1 January 2007.  Vests in three equal tranches on 1 January 2007, 

2008 and 2009.

3  D Grant ceased employment 16 February 2007.  Mr Grant qualifi ed to receive 

tranche 1 of the 2006 PIP.

4  D McMahon appointed 29 January 2007 and ceased employment 17 January 2008.
5 

The valuations were determined in accordance with AASB 2 Share Based 
Payments by the Directors. The valuations were performed using an option pricing 
model.

18

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As lead auditor for the audit of Iluka Resources Limited for the year ended 31 December 2007, I declare that, to the best 
of my knowledge and belief, there have been:

(a) 

no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; 
and

(b) 

no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.

This declaration is in respect of Iluka Resources Limited and the entities it controlled during the year.

David J Smith 
Partner 
PricewaterhouseCoopers

Perth
12 March 2008

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

n
o
i
t
a
r
a
l
c
e
D
e
c
n
e
d
n
e
p
e
d
n
I

’
s
r
o
t
i
d
u
A

Iluka Resources Limited 

19

 
 
 CONTENTS

Financial Report

Income Statements 

Balance Sheets 

Statements of Recognised Income and Expense 

Cash Flow Statements 

Notes to the Financial Statements 

Directors’ Declaration 

Independent Audit Report to the Members 

21

22

23

24

25

84

85

t
r
o
p
e
R

l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F

20

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Revenue from continuing operations 

Other income 
Expenses, excluding borrowing costs, closure costs
and impairment charges 

Exchange gains on foreign currency borrowings 

Interest and fi nance charges 

Rehabilitation and restoration accretion expense 

Total borrowing costs 

Closure costs and impairment charges 

Profi t (loss) before income tax 

Income tax (expense) benefi t 

Profi t from continuing operations 

Profi t from discontinued operations 

Profi t for the year 

Profi t attributable to minority interest 

Profi t attributable to members of Iluka Resources Limited 

Earnings per share for profi t from continuing operations attributable 
to the ordinary equity holders of the Company:

Basic earnings per share 

Diluted earnings per share 

Earnings per share for profi t attributable to the ordinary equity 
holders of the Company:

Basic earnings per share 

Diluted earnings per share 

The above income statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

Consolidated 

 Parent entity

2007 
$M 

920.1 

13.6 

2006 
$M 

983.4 

43.0 

2007 
$M 

277.3 

10.5 

2006
$M

346.0

- 

(808.3) 

(847.7) 

(251.9) 

(268.1)

8.0 

(43.0) 

(5.6) 

(48.6) 

- 

(4.7) 

8.6 

3.9 

- 

3.9 

- 

3.9 

10.5

(28.3)

(2.8)

(31.1)

(60.0)

(2.7)

10.3

7.6

-

7.6

-

7.6

- 

(43.8) 

(16.6) 

(60.4) 

- 

(29.0) 

(13.0) 

(42.0) 

- 

(104.5) 

65.0 

(15.5) 

49.5 

10.9 

60.4 

(9.3) 

51.1 

32.2 

(10.1) 

22.1 

9.4 

31.5 

(10.5) 

21.0 

Cents 

Cents 

17.0 

17.0 

21.6 

21.6 

5.0

5.0

9.1 

9.1

Notes 

5 

6 

7 

7 

7 

7 

8 

9 

44 

44 

44 

44 

Iluka Resources Limited 

21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance sheets
as at 31 December 2007

ASSETS 

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents 
Receivables 
Inventories 
Derivative fi nancial instruments 
Current tax assets 
Other  
Assets of disposal group classifi ed as held for sale 

Total current assets 

Non-current assets 

Receivables 
Inventories 
Other fi nancial assets 
Property, plant and equipment 
Derivative fi nancial instruments 
Deferred tax assets 
Intangible assets 
Other  

Total non-current assets 

Total assets 

LIABILITIES 

Current liabilities

Payables 
Interest-bearing liabilities 
Current tax liabilities 
Provisions 
Liabilities of a disposal group classifi ed as held for sale 

Total current liabilities 

Non-current liabilities 

Interest-bearing liabilities 
Deferred tax liabilities 
Provisions 

Total non-current liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

EQUITY

Contributed equity 
Reserves 
Retained (losses) profi ts 

Parent entity interest 

Minority interest 

Total equity 

The above balance sheets should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

22

Annual Report 2007

Notes 

10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
9 

16 
21 
17 
18 
13 
19 
20 
22 

23 
24 
26 
25 
9 

27 
28 
29 

30 
31(a) 
31(b) 

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

19.9 
190.5 
319.9 
7.8 
12.7 
11.2 
31.6 

593.6 

- 
- 
1.2 
1,246.4 
1.0 
9.9 
15.2 
0.7 

1,274.4 

2006 
$M 

17.4 
232.2 
249.4 
3.5 
- 
17.9 
33.2 

553.6 

3.8 
5.5 
1.2 
1,266.3 
1.7 
14.9 
16.8 
0.7 

1,310.9 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

- 
44.7 
70.7 
2.1 
12.4 
6.7 
- 

- 
56.1
77.7
-
-
0.5
-

136.6 

134.3

289.2 
- 
849.2 
246.2 
0.7 
- 
- 
- 

315.2
2.7
849.2
227.9
-
-
-
-

1,385.3 

1,395.0

1,868.0 

1,864.5 

1,521.9 

1,529.3

113.1 
230.7 
8.3 
55.2 
6.8 

414.1 

387.3 
44.7 
270.3 

702.3 

133.4 
194.0 
19.4 
57.9 
6.7 

411.4 

419.9 
56.8 
259.9 

736.6 

1,116.4 

1,148.0 

751.6 

716.5 

662.6 
23.8 
(2.8) 

683.6 

68.0 

751.6 

611.0 
39.7 
(3.5) 

647.2 

69.3 

716.5 

33.9 
230.7 
- 
16.9 
- 

281.5 

387.3 
9.0 
88.0 

484.3 

765.8 

756.1 

662.6 
21.0 
72.5 

756.1 

- 

756.1 

41.9
188.5
8.6
18.9
-

257.9

419.9
6.1
75.0

501.0

758.9

770.4

611.0
39.8
119.6

770.4

-

770.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statements of Recognised Income and Expense
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Exchange differences on translation of foreign entities 

Cash fl ow hedges, net of tax 

Actuarial losses on defi ned benefi t plans 

Net expense recognised directly in equity 

Profi t for the year 

Total recognised income and expense for the year 

Total recognised income and expense for the year is attributable to:

Members of Iluka Resources Limited 

Minority interest 

Notes 

31 

31 

31 

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

3.2 

(16.4) 

(0.2) 

(13.4) 

60.4 

47.0 

37.4 

9.6 

47.0 

2006 
$M 

(0.6) 

(10.9) 

(0.1) 

(11.6) 

31.5 

19.9 

9.0 

10.9 

19.9 

2007 
$M 

- 

2006
$M

-

(16.7) 

(11.4)

- 

(16.7) 

3.9 

(12.8) 

(12.8) 

- 

(12.8) 

-

(11.4)

7.6

(3.8)

(3.8)

-

(3.8)

The above statements of recognised income and expense should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

Iluka Resources Limited 

23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Consolidated 

Parent entity

Notes 

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

957.4 

(841.4) 

116.0 

1.3 

- 

(45.2) 

(39.7) 

47.2 

(18.5) 

14.5 

19.0 

0.9 

95.5 

1,010.1 

(855.2) 

154.9 

1.3 

- 

(41.2) 

(23.8) 

49.7 

(20.1) 

1.5 

18.7 

1.2 

142.2 

(118.2) 

(172.7) 

- 

16.2 

- 

41.9 

(102.0) 

(130.8) 

37.4 

(16.4) 

(39.4) 

(10.8) 

39.4 

(0.1) 

10.1 

3.6 

17.4 

(1.1) 

19.9 

123.9 

(74.6) 

(51.2) 

(10.0) 

- 

- 

(11.9) 

(0.5) 

18.2 

(0.3) 

17.4 

244.3 

(218.2) 

26.1 

- 

1.0 

(44.4) 

(26.3) 

15.6 

- 

- 

- 

0.5 

(27.5) 

(52.3) 

44.4 

9.0 

1.1 

37.4 

(10.9) 

(39.4) 

- 

39.4 

(0.1) 

26.4 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Cash fl ows from operating activities 

Receipts from customers (inclusive of goods and services tax) 

Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of goods and services tax) 

Interest received 

Management fees from controlled entity 

Borrowing costs 

Income taxes paid  

Goods and services tax received 

Payments for exploration expenditure 

Coal compensation receipts 

Royalty income 

Receipts from other operating activities 

Net cash infl ow (outfl ow) from operating activities 

42 

Cash fl ows from investing activities

Payments for property, plant and equipment 

Loans from controlled entities 

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 

Net cash (outfl ow) infl ow from investing activities 

Cash fl ows from fi nancing activities 

Proceeds from borrowings 

Repayment of borrowings 

Dividends paid  

Dividends paid to minority interests in controlled entities 

Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares 

Share issue costs 

Net cash infl ow (outfl ow) from fi nancing activities 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 

Financing arrangements 

Non-cash fi nancing and investing activities 

32 

10 

24,27

43

The above cash fl ow statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

24

Annual Report 2007

2006
$M

312.4

(249.2)

63.2

-

0.9

(40.4)

(9.9)

17.0

-

-

-

0.6

31.4

(43.5)

13.3

0.2

(30.0)

123.9

(74.1)

(51.2)

-

-

-

(1.4)

-

-

-

-

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contents of the Notes to the Financial Statements

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

Reserves and retained profi ts 

Dividends 

Key management personnel 

Remuneration of auditors 

Retirement benefi t obligations 

Contingent liabilities 

Commitments 

Related party transactions 

Investments in signifi cant controlled entities 

Deed of cross guarantee 

Interests in joint ventures 

Reconciliation of profi t after income tax to net cash  
infl ow (outfl ow) from operating activities 

Non-cash investing and fi nancing activities 

Earnings per share 

Share-based payments 

Events occuring after the balance sheet date 

63

65

66

68

68

73

74

75

76

77

79

79

79

80

81

83

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

Summary of signifi cant accounting policies 

Critical accounting estimates and judgements 

Financial risk management 

Segment information 

Revenue 

Other income 

Expenses 

Income tax  

Discontinued operation 

Current assets - Cash and cash equivalents 

Current assets - Receivables 

Current assets - Inventories 

Derivative fi nancial instruments 

Current assets - Current tax assets 

Current assets - Other 

Non-current assets - Receivables 

Non-current assets - Other fi nancial assets 

Non-current assets - Property, plant and equipment 

Non-current assets - Deferred tax assets 

Non-current assets - Intangible assets 

Non-current assets - Inventories 

Non-current assets - Other 

Current liabilities - Payables 

Current liabilities - Interest-bearing liabilities 

Current liabilities - Provisions 

Current liabilities - Current tax liabilities 

Non-current liabilities - Interest-bearing liabilities 

Non-current liabilities - Deferred tax liabilities 

Non-current liabilities - Provisions 

Contributed equity 

26

37

38

42

44

44

45

46

47

48

48

49

50

51

51

51

51

52

54

55

55

55

56

56

56

56

57

60

60

61

Iluka Resources Limited 

25

 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies

The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of 
the Financial Report are set out below.  These policies have been 
consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise 
stated.  The Financial Report includes separate fi nancial statements 
for Iluka Resources Limited as an individual entity and the 
consolidated entity consisting of Iluka Resources Limited and its 
subsidiaries.

(a)  Basis of preparation

This general purpose fi nancial report has been prepared 
in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, other 
authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting 
Standards Board, Urgent Issues Group Interpretations and 
the Corporations Act 2001.

Compliance with IFRS
Australian Accounting Standards include Australian 
equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards 
(“AIFRS”).  Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the 
consolidated fi nancial statements and notes of Iluka 
Resources Limited comply with International Financial 
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  

Historical cost convention
These fi nancial statements have been prepared under the 
historical cost convention, as modifi ed by the revaluation 
of available-for-sale fi nancial assets, fi nancial assets and 
liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value 
through profi t or loss and certain classes of property, plant 
and equipment.

Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of fi nancial statements in conformity 
with AIFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting 
estimates.  It also requires management to exercise its 
judgement in the process of applying the consolidated entity’s 
accounting policies.  The areas involving a higher degree of 
judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and 
estimates are signifi cant to the fi nancial statements are 
disclosed in Note 2.

for the year then ended.  Iluka Resources Limited and 
its subsidiaries together are referred to in this fi nancial 
report as the Group or the consolidated entity.

Subsidiaries are all those entities (including special 
purpose entities) over which the Group has the power 
to govern the fi nancial and operating policies, generally 
accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half 
of the voting rights.  The existence and effect of 
potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or 
convertible are considered when assessing whether the 
Group controls another entity.

Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on 
which control is transferred to the Group.  They are de-
consolidated from the date that control ceases.

The purchase method of accounting is used to account 
for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group (refer to 
Note 1(g)).

Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised 
gains on transactions between Group companies are 
eliminated.  Unrealised losses are also eliminated 
unless the transaction provides evidence of the 
impairment of the asset transferred.  Accounting 
policies of subsidiaries have been changed where 
necessary to ensure consistency with the policies 
adopted by the Group.

Minority interests in the results and equity of 
subsidiaries are shown separately in the consolidated 
income statement and balance sheet respectively.

(ii)  Joint ventures

The consolidated entity has a coal operation and 
titanium minerals and zircon exploration activities which 
are conducted through joint ventures with other parties.  
The coal operation is classifi ed as a discontinued 
operation. Refer Note 9.

The proportionate interests in the assets, liabilities and 
expenses of the joint venture operations have been 
incorporated in the fi nancial statements under the 
appropriate headings.  Details of joint ventures are set 
out in Note 41.

(b) 

Principles of consolidation

(i)  Subsidiaries

The consolidated fi nancial statements incorporate 
the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of Iluka 
Resources Limited (‘’Company’’ or ‘’parent entity’’) as 
at 31 December 2007 and the results of all subsidiaries 

(c) 

Segment reporting

A business segment is identifi ed for a group of assets and 
operations engaged in providing products or services that 
are subject to risks and returns that are different to those of 
other business segments.

26

Annual Report 2007

Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies  

(continued)

A geographical segment is engaged in providing products 
or services within a particular economic environment and is 
subject to risks and returns that are different from those of 
segments operating in other economic environments.

(d) 

Foreign currency translation

(i)  Functional and presentation currency

Items included in the fi nancial statements of each of 
the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of 
the primary economic environment in which the entity 
operates (“the functional currency”).  The consolidated 
fi nancial statements are presented in Australian 
dollars, which is Iluka Resources Limited’s functional 
and presentation currency.

(ii)  Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the 
functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing 
at the dates of the transactions.  Foreign exchange 
gains and losses resulting from the settlement of 
such transactions and from the translation at year-
end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities 
denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in 
the income statement, except when deferred in equity 
as qualifying cash fl ow hedges and qualifying net 
investment hedges.

Translation differences on non-monetary fi nancial 
assets and liabilities are reported as part of the fair 
value gain or loss.  Translation differences on non-
monetary items, such as equities held at fair value 
through profi t or loss, are reported as part of the fair 
value gain or loss.  Translation differences on non-
monetary items, such as equities classifi ed as available-
for-sale fi nancial assets, are included in the fair value 
reserve in equity.

(iii)  Foreign currency loans

Loans drawn down from entities which are repayable in 
foreign currencies are translated to Australian dollars 
at exchange rates applicable at year-end. 

(iv)  Group companies

The results and fi nancial position of all the Group 
entities (none of which has the currency of a 
hyperinfl ationary economy) that have a functional 
currency different from the presentation currency are 
translated into the presentation currency as follows:

• 

• 

• 

assets and liabilities for each balance sheet 
presented are translated at the closing rate at the 
date of that balance sheet;

income and expenses for each income statement 
are translated at average exchange rates; and

all resulting exchange differences are recognised 
as a separate component of equity.

On consolidation, exchange differences arising from 
the translation of any net investment in foreign entities, 
and of borrowings and other currency instruments 
designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to 
shareholders’ equity.  When a foreign operation is sold 
or borrowings repaid, a proportionate share of such 
exchange differences are recognised in the income 
statement as part of the gain or loss on sale.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the 
acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets 
and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the 
closing rate.

(e)  Revenue recognition

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration 
received or receivable.  Amounts disclosed as revenue are 
net of returns, trade allowances and duties and taxes paid.  
Revenue is recognised for the major business activities as 
follows:

(i)  Product sales

Amounts are recognised as sales revenue when there 
has been a passing of risk to a customer, and:

• 

• 

• 

the product is in a form suitable for delivery and 
no further processing is required by, or on behalf 
of, the consolidated entity;

the quantity, quality and selling price of the 
product can be determined with reasonable 
accuracy; and

the product has been despatched to the customer 
and is no longer under the physical control of the 
consolidated entity or the customer has formally 
acknowledged legal ownership of the product 
including all inherent risks, albeit that the product 
may be stored in facilities the consolidated entity 
controls.

Gains and losses, including premiums paid or received, 
in respect of forward sales, options and other deferred 
delivery arrangements which hedge anticipated 
revenues from future production, are deferred and 
included in sales revenue when the hedged proceeds 
are received.

Iluka Resources Limited 

27

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(continued)

(ii)  Land development and resale

Land is not sold until the development work is 
completed, and revenue is recognised where there is a 
signed unconditional contract of sale.

(f) 

Income tax

The income tax expense or revenue for the period is the tax 
payable on the current period’s taxable income based on 
the national income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted 
by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable 
to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets 
and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the fi nancial 
statements, and to unused tax losses.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for 
temporary differences at the tax rates expected to apply 
when the assets are recovered or liabilities are settled, 
based on those tax rates which are enacted or substantively 
enacted for each jurisdiction.  The relevant tax rates are 
applied to the cumulative amounts of deductible and taxable 
temporary differences to measure the deferred tax asset 
or liability.  An exception is made for certain temporary 
differences arising from the initial recognition of an asset 
or a liability.  No deferred tax asset or liability is recognised 
in relation to these temporary differences if they arose in a 
transaction, other than a business combination, that at the 
time of the transaction did not affect either accounting profi t 
or loss or taxable profi t or loss.

Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible 
temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is 
probable that future taxable amounts will be available to 
utilise those temporary differences and losses.

Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for 
temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax 
bases of investments in controlled entities where the parent 
entity is able to  control the timing of the reversal of the 
temporary differences and it is probable that the differences 
will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Current and deferred tax balances attributable to amounts 
recognised directly in equity are also recognised directly in 
equity.

Tax consolidation legislation
Iluka Resources Limited and its wholly-owned Australian 
controlled entities have implemented the tax consolidation 
legislation.

28

Annual Report 2007

On adoption of the tax consolidation legislation, the entities 
in the tax consolidated group entered into a tax sharing 
agreement which, in the opinion of the Directors, limits the 
joint and several liability of the wholly-owned entities in the 
case of a default by the head entity, Iluka Resources Limited.

The entities have also entered into a tax funding agreement 
under which the wholly-owned entities fully compensate 
Iluka Resources Limited for any current tax payable 
assumed and are compensated by Iluka Resources Limited 
for any current tax receivable and deferred tax assets 
relating to unused tax losses or unused tax credits that 
are transferred to Iluka Resources Limited under the 
tax consolidation legislation.  The funding amounts are 
determined by reference to the amounts recognised in the 
wholly-owned entities fi nancial statements.

The amounts receivable/payable under the tax funding 
agreement are due upon receipt of the funding advice from 
the head entity, which is issued as soon as practicable after 
the end of each fi nancial year.  The head entity may also 
require payment of interim funding amounts to assist with 
its obligations to pay tax instalments.  The funding amounts 
are recognised as current intercompany receivables or 
payables.

(g)   Acquisitions of assets

The purchase method of accounting is used to account for 
all acquisitions of assets (including business combinations) 
regardless of whether equity instruments or other 
assets are acquired.  Cost is measured as the fair value 
of the assets given, shares issued or liabilities incurred 
or assumed at the date of exchange plus costs directly 
attributable to the acquisition.  Where equity instruments 
are issued in an acquisition, the fair value of the instruments 
is their published market price as at the date of exchange 
unless, in rare circumstances, it can be demonstrated that 
the published price at the date of exchange is an unreliable 
indicator of fair value and that other evidence and valuation 
methods provide a more reliable measure of fair value.  
Transaction costs arising on the issue of equity instruments 
are recognised directly in equity.

Identifi able assets acquired and liabilities and contingent 
liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured 
initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, 
irrespective of the extent of any minority interest.  The 
excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the 
consolidated entity’s share of the identifi able net assets 
acquired is recorded as goodwill.  If the cost of acquisition 
is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary 
acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the 
income statement, but only after a reassessment of the 
identifi cation and measurement of the net assets acquired.

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(j)  

Inventories

(continued)

Where settlement of any part of cash consideration is 
deferred, the amounts payable in the future are discounted 
to their present value as at the date of exchange.  The 
discount rate used is the entity’s incremental borrowing 
rate, being the rate at which a similar borrowing could be 
obtained from an independent fi nancier under comparable 
terms and conditions.

Costs relating to the acquisition of new areas of interest are 
capitalised as either exploration and evaluation expenditure, 
development properties or mine properties depending on 
the stage of development reached at the date of acquisition. 
Refer Note 1(y) for more information.

A liability for restructuring costs is recognised as at the 
date of acquisition of an entity or part thereof when there 
is a demonstrable commitment to the restructuring of the 
acquired entity and a reliable estimate of the amount of the 
liability can be made.

(h)   Cash and cash equivalents

For cash fl ow statement presentation purposes, cash and 
cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at 
call with fi nancial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid 
investments with original maturities of three months or 
less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash 
and which are subject to an insignifi cant risk of changes 
in value, and bank overdrafts.  Bank overdrafts are shown 
within interest-bearing liabilities in current liabilities on the 
balance sheet.

(i) 

Trade receivables

Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and 
subsequently measured at amortised cost, less provision 
for doubtful debts.  Trade and other receivables are due 
for settlement no more than 90 days from the date of 
recognition.

Collectibility of trade receivables is reviewed on an ongoing 
basis.  Debts which are known to be uncollectible are written 
off.  A provision for doubtful receivables is established when 
there is objective evidence that the consolidated entity 
will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the 
original terms of receivables.  The amount of the provision 
is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and 
the present value of estimated future cash fl ows, discounted 
at the original effective interest rate.  Cash fl ows relating 
to short-term receivables are not discounted if the effect of 
discounting is immaterial.  The amount of the provision is 
recognised in the income statement.

Finished goods and work in progress inventories are valued 
at the lower of cost and estimated net realisable value.

Costs represent weighted average cost and include 
direct costs and an appropriate portion of fi xed and 
variable overhead expenditure, including depreciation and 
amortisation.

Net realisable value is the amount estimated to be obtained 
from the sale of the item of inventory in the normal course 
of business, less any anticipated costs to be incurred prior 
to its sale.

Stores are valued at weighted average cost. 

Obsolete or damaged inventories have been valued at 
net realisable value.  A regular and ongoing review is 
undertaken to establish the extent of surplus items, and a 
provision is made for any potential loss on their disposal.

(k)   Non-current assets (or disposal groups) held for resale

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) are classifi ed 
as held for sale and stated at the lower of their carrying 
amount and fair value less costs to sell if their carrying 
amount will be recovered principally through a sale 
transaction rather than through continuing use.

An impairment loss is recognised for any initial or 
subsequent write-down of the asset (or disposal group) 
to fair value less costs to sell.  A gain is recognised for 
any subsequent increases in fair value less costs to sell 
of an asset (or disposal group), but not in excess of any 
cumulative impairment loss previously recognised.  A gain or 
loss not previously recognised by the date of the sale of the 
non-current asset (or disposal group) is recognised at the 
date of derecognition.

Non-current assets (including those that are part of a 
disposal group) are not depreciated or amortised while they 
are classifi ed as held for sale.  Interest and other expenses 
attributable to the liabilities of a disposal group classifi ed as 
held for sale continue to be recognised.

Non-current assets classifi ed as held for sale and the assets 
of a disposal group classifi ed as held for sale are presented 
separately from the other assets in the balance sheet.  The 
liabilities of a disposal group classifi ed as held for sale are 
presented separately from other liabilities in the balance 
sheet.

Iluka Resources Limited 

29

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(continued)

Movements in the hedging reserve in shareholders’ equity 
are shown in Note 31.

(l)  

Investments and other fi nancial assets

(i)  Fair value hedge

The consolidated entity classifi es its investments in the 
following categories: fi nancial assets at fair value through 
profi t or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity 
investments, and available-for-sale fi nancial assets.  The 
classifi cation depends on the purpose for which the 
investments were acquired.  Management determines the 
classifi cation of its investments at initial recognition and re-
evaluates this designation at each reporting date.

The only investment category for the current and preceding 
year is loans and receivables.

Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative fi nancial assets 
with fi xed or determinable payments that are not quoted in 
an active market.  They arise when the consolidated entity 
provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor with 
no intention of selling the receivable.  They are included in 
current assets, except for those with maturities greater than 
12 months after the balance sheet date which are classifi ed 
as non-current assets.  Loans and receivables are included 
in receivables in the balance sheet (Notes 11 and 16).

(m)   Derivatives

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date 
a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently 
remeasured to their fair value at balance date.  The method 
of recognising the resulting gain or loss depends on whether 
the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if 
so, the nature of the item being hedged.  The consolidated 
entity designates certain derivatives as either: (1) hedges 
of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or a fi rm 
commitment (fair value hedge); or (2) hedges of highly 
probable forecast transactions (cash fl ow hedges).

At the inception of the transaction, the consolidated entity 
documents the relationship between hedging instruments 
and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective 
and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.  
The consolidated entity also documents its assessment, both 
at transaction inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether 
the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have 
been and will continue to be highly effective in offsetting 
changes in fair values or cash fl ows of hedged items.

The fair values of various derivative fi nancial instruments 
used for hedging purposes are disclosed in Note 13.  

30

Annual Report 2007

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are 
designated and qualify as fair value hedges are 
recorded in the income statement, together with any 
changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability 
that are attributable to the hedged risk.

(ii)  Cash fl ow hedge

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of 
derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash 
fl ow hedges is recognised in equity in the hedging 
reserve.  The gain or loss relating to the ineffective 
portion is recognised immediately in the income 
statement.

Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in the 
income statement in the periods when the hedged 
item will affect profi t or loss (for instance when the 
forecast sale that is hedged takes place).  However, 
when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in 
the recognition of a non-fi nancial asset (for example, 
inventory) or a non-fi nancial liability, the gains and 
losses previously deferred in equity are transferred 
from equity and included in the measurement of the 
initial cost or carrying amount of the asset or liability.

When a hedging instrument expires or is sold or 
terminated, or when a hedge no longer meets the 
criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or 
loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity 
and is recognised when the forecast transaction is 
ultimately recognised in the income statement.  When 
a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, 
the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity 
is immediately transferred to the income statement.

(iii)  Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge 

accounting
Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge 
accounting.  Changes in the fair value of any derivative 
instrument that does not qualify for hedge accounting 
are recognised immediately in the income statement.

(n)   Fair value estimation

The fair value of fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities must 
be estimated for recognition, measurement and disclosure 
purposes.

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(continued)

The fair value of fi nancial instruments traded in active 
markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading 
and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market 
prices at the balance sheet date.  The quoted market price 
used for fi nancial assets held by the consolidated entity is 
the current bid price; the appropriate quoted market price 
for fi nancial liabilities is the current ask price.

The fair value of fi nancial instruments that are not traded in 
an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) 
is determined using valuation techniques.  The consolidated 
entity uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions 
that are based on market conditions existing at each balance 
date.  Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar 
instruments are used for long-term debt instruments held.  
Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash 
fl ows, are used to determine fair value for the remaining 
fi nancial instruments.  The fair value of interest rate swaps 
is calculated as the present value of the estimated future 
cash fl ows.  The fair value of forward exchange contracts 
is determined using forward exchange market rates at the 
balance sheet date.

The nominal value less estimated credit adjustments of 
trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate 
their fair values.  The fair value of fi nancial liabilities for 
disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future 
contractual cash fl ows at the current market interest 
rate that is available to the consolidated entity for similar 
fi nancial instruments.

 (o)   Property, plant and equipment

Land and buildings are shown at historical cost, less 
subsequent depreciation for buildings.  All other property, 
plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less 
depreciation.  Historical cost includes expenditure that is 
directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.  Land is 
not depreciated.  

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying 
amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, 
only when it is probable that future economic benefi ts 
associated with the item will fl ow to the consolidated entity 
and the cost of the item can be measured reliably.  All 
other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income 
statement during the fi nancial period in which they are 
incurred.

Mine specifi c plant, machinery and equipment refers to 
plant, machinery and equipment for which the economic 
useful life cannot extend beyond the life of its host mine.

Depreciation and amortisation of mine buildings, reserves 
and development and mine specifi c plant, machinery and 
equipment is provided for over the life of the relevant 
mine or asset, whichever is the shorter.  Depreciation and 
amortisation is determined on a straight-line basis.  The 
expected useful lives are as follows:

•  Mine buildings 

•  Mine specifi c plant,  
machinery and  
equipment 

• 

• 

Reserves and  
development

Other non-mine 
specifi c plant and 
equipment

the shorter of applicable mine 
life and 25 years

the shorter of applicable mine
or asset life and 25 years, 
depending on the nature of the 
asset

the applicable mine life

3-25 years 

The reserves and life of each mine and the remaining 
useful life of each class of asset are reassessed at regular 
intervals and the depreciation rates adjusted accordingly.

(p)  

Intangible assets

(i)    Patents and trademarks

Signifi cant costs associated with patents and 
trademarks are deferred and amortised on a straight-
line basis over the periods of their expected benefi t 
which is 25 years.

(ii)   Royalty income and amortisation of royalty assets

Royalty income included in the consolidated entity is 
recognised as revenue using an accrual basis.  Under 
the terms of the royalty agreements, royalty income 
is received on a quarterly basis and any under or over 
accrual applicable to previously recognised royalty 
income is adjusted for based on the receipt of the 
royalty income entitlement.

The royalty entitlement asset (Mining Area C) included 
in intangible assets is stated at cost less accumulated 
amortisation.  The cost of the asset is amortised on a 
straight-line basis so as to write-off the cost over its 
estimated useful life of 25 years.

Iluka Resources Limited 

31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(continued)

(q)   Trade and other payables

These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services 
provided to the consolidated entity prior to the end of 
fi nancial year which are unpaid.  The amounts are unsecured 
and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.

(r)   Borrowings

Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of 
transaction costs incurred.  Borrowings are subsequently 
measured at amortised cost.  Any difference between the 
proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption 
amount is recognised in the income statement over the 
period of the borrowings using the effective interest 
method.

Borrowings are classifi ed as current liabilities unless the 
consolidated entity has an unconditional right to defer 
settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the 
balance sheet date.

• 

it is more likely than not that an outfl ow of resources 
will be required to settle the obligation; and

• 

the amount has been reliably estimated.  

Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.

Where there are a number of similar obligations, the 
likelihood that an outfl ow will be required in settlement 
is determined by considering the class of obligations as a 
whole.  A provision is recognised even if the likelihood of an 
outfl ow with respect to any one item included in the same 
class of obligations may be small.

(u)   Employee benefi ts

(i)  Wages and salaries, annual leave and sick leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-
monetary benefi ts, annual leave and accumulating 
sick leave expected to be settled within 12 months of 
the reporting date are recognised in current liabilities 
- payables. Liabilities for non-accumulating sick leave 
are recognised when the leave is taken and measured 
at the rates paid or payable.

(s)   Borrowing costs

(ii)  Long service leave

Borrowing costs are recognised as expenses in the period in 
which they are incurred, except where they are included in 
the costs of qualifying assets.  Qualifying assets are assets 
that take more than 12 months to prepare for their intended 
use or sale.  

The capitalisation rate used to determine the amount 
of borrowing costs to be capitalised is the weighted 
average interest rate applicable to the entity’s outstanding 
borrowings during the year.  No interest was capitalised in 
2007, the weighted average interest rate applied in the prior 
year was 6.0 per cent.

Borrowing costs include:

• 

• 

interest on bank overdrafts and short-term and long-
term borrowings, including amounts paid or received 
on interest rate swaps;

amortisation of ancillary costs incurred in connection 
with the arrangement of borrowings; and

• 

fi nance lease charges.

(t)   Provisions

Provisions for legal claims are recognised when: 

• 

the consolidated entity has a present legal obligation 
as a result of past events;

32

Annual Report 2007

The liability for long service leave is recognised in the 
provision for employee benefi ts and measured as the 
present value of expected future payments to be made 
in respect of services provided by employees up to 
the reporting date.  Consideration is given to expected 
future wage and salary levels, experience of employee 
departures and periods of service.  Expected future 
payments are discounted using market yields at the 
reporting date on national government bonds with 
terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely 
as possible, the estimated future cash outfl ows.

(iii)  Retirement benefi t obligations

All employees of the consolidated entity are entitled 
to benefi ts on retirement, disability or death from 
the consolidated entity’s superannuation plans.  The 
consolidated entity has defi ned benefi t section and an 
accumulation type benefi ts section within its plans.  
The defi ned benefi t section provides defi ned lump sum 
benefi ts based on years of service and fi nal average 
salary.  The accumulation type benefi ts section receives 
fi xed contributions from consolidated entity companies 
and the consolidated entity’s legal or constructive 
obligation is limited to these contributions.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(continued)

A liability or asset in respect of defi ned benefi t 
superannuation plans is recognised in the balance 
sheet and is measured as the present value of the 
defi ned benefi t obligation at the reporting date plus 
actuarial gains (less actuarial losses) less the fair 
value of the superannuation fund’s assets at that 
date and any unrecognised past service cost.  The 
present value of the defi ned benefi t obligation is 
based on expected future payments which arise 
from membership of the fund to the reporting date, 
calculated annually by independent actuaries using the 
projected unit credit method.  Consideration is given to 
expected future wage and salary levels, experience of 
employee departures and periods of service.

Expected future payments are discounted using market 
yields at the reporting date on national government 
bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, 
as closely as possible, the estimated future cash 
outfl ows.

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience 
adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions 
are charged or credited to equity over the employees’ 
expected average remaining working lives. 

Past service costs are recognised immediately in 
income, unless the changes to the superannuation fund 
are conditional on the employees remaining in service 
for a specifi ed period of time (the vesting period).  In 
this case, the past service costs are amortised on a 
straight-line basis over the vesting period.

Future taxes that are funded by the consolidated 
entity and are part of the provision of the existing 
benefi t obligation (eg taxes on investment income 
and employer contributions) are taken into account in 
measuring the net liability or asset.

Contributions to the accumulation fund are recognised 
as an expense as they become payable.  Prepaid 
contributions are recognised as an asset to the 
extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future 
payments is available.

(iv)  Share-based payments

Share-based compensation benefi ts are provided to 
employees via the Performance Incentive Plan, the 
Directors, Executives and Employees Share Acquisition 
Plan and the Employee Share Ownership scheme.  
Information relating to these schemes is set out in 
Notes 33 and 45.

The fair value of shares granted under the 
Performance Incentive Plan is determined to be the 
closing share price on the grant date.  The fair value of 
the grant is charged as an expense through the income 
statement on a straight-line basis between the grant 
date and the vesting date of entitlements.

The fair value of entitlements offered under the Plan 
has been determined by the Directors, in accordance 
with the measurement criteria of Accounting Standard 
AASB 2 Share-Based Payment.   This fair value 
is recognised as an expense through the income 
statement on a straight line basis between the offer 
date and the vesting date for each respective plan.

Shares provided under the Employee Share Ownership 
scheme are purchased on-market, with the purchase cost 
being recognised as an employee benefi ts expense.

(v)  Profi t-sharing and bonus plans

The consolidated entity recognises a liability and 
an expense for bonuses and profi t-sharing based 
on a formula that takes into consideration the 
profi t attributable to the Company’s shareholders 
after certain adjustments.  The consolidated entity 
recognises a provision where contractually obliged 
or where there is a past practice that has created a 
constructive obligation.

(v)   Contributed equity

Ordinary shares are classifi ed as equity.  

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new 
shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, 
net of tax, from the proceeds.  Incremental costs directly 
attributable to the issue of new shares or options for the 
acquisition of a business, are not included in the cost of the 
acquisition as part of the purchase consideration.

(w)   Dividends

Provision is made for the amount of any dividend declared 
on or before the end of the fi nancial year but not distributed 
at balance date.

(x)   Earnings per share

(i)  Basic earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the 
profi t attributable to equity holders of the Company, 
excluding any costs of servicing equity other than 
ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of 
ordinary shares outstanding during the fi nancial year, 
adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued 
during the year.

Iluka Resources Limited 

33

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(continued)

All the above expenditure is carried forward up to 
commencement of operations at which time it is amortised 
in accordance with the policy stated in Note 1(o).

(ii)  Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share adjusts the fi gures used in 
the determination of basic earnings per share to take 
into account the after income tax effect of interest 
and other fi nancing costs associated with dilutive 
potential ordinary shares and the weighted average 
number of shares assumed to have been issued for no 
consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary 
shares.

(y)   Project exploration, evaluation and development 

expenditure

Exploration and evaluation expenditure is accumulated 
separately for each area of interest in accordance with 
AASB 6 Exploration and Evaluation of Mineral Resources.  
Such expenditure comprises net direct costs and an 
appropriate portion of related overhead expenditure.

Expenditure is carried forward when incurred in areas 
for which the consolidated entity has rights of tenure and 
where economic mineralisation is indicated, but activities 
have not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable 
assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically 
recoverable reserves and active and signifi cant operations 
in relation to the area are continuing.  Each such project is 
regularly reviewed.  If the project is abandoned or if it is 
considered unlikely the project will proceed to development, 
accumulated costs to that point are written off immediately.

Each area of interest is limited to a size related to a known 
or probable mineral resource capable of supporting a mining 
operation.

Identifi able exploration assets acquired from another 
mining company are recognised as assets at their cost of 
acquisition, as determined by the requirements of AASB 3 
Business Combinations.

Projects are advanced to development status when it is 
expected that accumulated and future expenditure can be 
recouped through project development or sale.  Capitalised 
exploration is transferred to mine reserves once the related 
ore body has achieved JORC reserve status and has been 
included in the life of mine plan.

Direct costs associated with the commissioning of plant and 
equipment are capitalised and included in property, plant 
and equipment.  Pre-commissioning costs in testing the 
processing plant are also capitalised.

34

Annual Report 2007

(z)   Non-current assets constructed by the 

consolidated entity

The cost of non-current assets constructed by the 
consolidated entity includes the cost of all materials 
used in construction, direct labour on the project, project 
management costs, borrowing costs incurred during 
construction and an appropriate proportion of variable and 
fi xed overheads.

Borrowing costs included in the cost of non-current assets 
are those costs that would have been avoided if the 
expenditure on the construction of the assets had not been 
made and are capitalised in accordance with the policy 
stated in Note 1(s).

(aa)   Rehabilitation and mine closure costs

The consolidated entity has obligations to dismantle, 
remove, restore and rehabilitate certain items of property, 
plant and equipment.

Under AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment, the cost of 
an asset must include any estimated costs of dismantling 
and removing the asset and restoring the site on which it 
is located.  The capitalised rehabilitation and mine closure 
costs are depreciated (along with the other costs included 
in the asset) over the asset’s useful life.  The depreciation 
expense is included in the cost of sales of goods.

AASB 137 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent 
Assets requires a provision to be raised for the present 
value of the estimated cost of settling the rehabilitation 
and restoration obligations existing at balance date.  Those 
costs that relate to rehabilitation and restoration obligations 
arising from the production process are recognised in 
production costs.  The estimated costs are discounted 
using a pre-tax discount rate that refl ects the time value of 
money.  The discount rate must not refl ect risks for which 
future cash fl ow estimates have been adjusted.  A discount 
rate of 6.0 per cent (2006: 6.0 per cent) has been used in 
calculating the rehabilitation and restoration provisions of 
the consolidated entity.

As the value of the provision represents the discounted 
value of the present obligation to restore, dismantle and 
rehabilitate, the increase in the provision due to the passage 
of time is recognised as an accretion expense within 
borrowing costs.  This borrowing cost is excluded from the 
cost of sales of goods.

 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(ad)   Restructuring costs

(continued)

(ab)  Recoverable amount of non-current assets

AASB 136 Impairment of Assets requires that depreciable 
assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for 
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances 
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  
An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which 
the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable 
amount.  The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s 
fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use.   Where there 
is no binding sale agreement or active market, fair value 
less costs to sell is based on the best information available 
to refl ect the amount the consolidated entity could receive 
for the Cash Generating Unit in an arms length transaction.   
For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are 
grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately 
identifi able cash fl ows (Cash Generating Units).

The estimates of future cash fl ows for each Cash Generating 
Unit are based on signifi cant assumptions including:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

estimates of the quantities of mineral reserves and 
resources for which there is a high degree of 
confi dence of economic extraction;

future production levels and the ability to sell that 
production;

future product prices based on the consolidated 
entity’s assessment of short and long term prices for 
each of the key products;

future exchange rates for the Australian dollar 
compared to the US dollar using external forecasts by 
recognised economic forecasters which project a 
medium term decline in the Australian dollar 
against the US dollar;

future cash costs of production, sustaining capital 
expenditure, rehabilitation and mine closure; and

the asset specifi c discount rate applicable to the Cash 
Generating Unit, based upon the consolidated entity’s 
weighted average cost of capital.

(ac)   Overburden costs

Expenditure associated with the removal of mine overburden 
is deferred and charged to the income statement over its 
useful life, which typically does not exceed one year.

Liabilities arising directly from undertaking a restructuring 
program, not in connection with the acquisition of an 
entity or operations, are recognised when a detailed 
plan of the restructuring activity has been developed and 
implementation of the restructuring program as planned 
has commenced, by either entering into contracts to 
undertake the restructuring activities or making a detailed 
announcement such that affected parties are in no doubt the 
restructuring program will proceed.

Liabilities for the cost of restructuring entities or operations 
acquired are recognised as at the date of acquisition 
of an entity, or part thereof, if the main features of the 
restructuring were planned and there was a demonstrable 
commitment to the restructuring at the acquisition date and 
this is supported by a detailed plan developed within three 
months of the acquisition or prior to the completion of the 
fi nancial report, if earlier.

The cost of restructuring provided for, other than related 
employee termination benefi ts, is the estimated cash fl ows, 
having regard to the risks of the restructuring activities, 
discounted using market yields at balance date on national 
government guaranteed bonds with terms to maturity and 
currency that match, as closely as possible, the expected 
future payments, where the effect of discounting is material.

Liabilities for employee termination benefi ts associated with 
restructurings are brought to account on the basis described 
in the accounting policy note for employee benefi ts (Note 
1(u)).  Liabilities for costs of restructurings and related 
employee termination benefi ts are disclosed in aggregate 
where the restructuring occurs as a consequence of an 
acquisition.

(ae)   Maintenance and repairs

Certain items of plant used in the primary extraction, 
separation and secondary processing of extracted minerals 
are subject to major overhaul on a cyclical basis.  Costs 
incurred during such overhauls are characterised as either 
in the nature of capital or in the nature of repairs and 
maintenance.  Work performed may involve:

(i)  

the replacement of a discrete sub-component asset, 
in which case an asset addition is recognised and the 
book value of the replaced item is written off; and

(ii)  demonstrably extending the useful life or functionality 
of an existing asset, in which case the relevant cost is 
added to the capitalised cost of the asset in question.

Iluka Resources Limited 

35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(continued)

Costs incurred during a major cyclical overhaul which do 
not constitute (i) or (ii) above, are written off as repairs and 
maintenance as incurred.  Costs qualifying for capitalisation 
under (i) or (ii) above are subsequently depreciated in 
accordance with Note 1(o).

General repairs and maintenance which are not 
characterised as part of a major cyclical overhaul are 
written off as incurred.

(af)   Rounding of amounts

The Company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 98/0100, 
issued by the Australian Securities and Investments 
Commission, relating to the ‘’rounding off’’ of amounts in 
the Financial Report.  Amounts in the Financial Report have 
been rounded off in accordance with that Class Order to the 
nearest hundred thousand dollars, or in certain cases, the 
nearest thousand dollars and the nearest dollar.

(ag)    New accounting standards and UIG interpretations 

not yet adopted

Certain new accounting standards and interpretations 
have been published that are not mandatory for 31 
December 2007 reporting periods.  The consolidated entity’s 
assessment of the impact of relevant new standards and 
interpretations is set out below. 

AASB-I 11 AASB 2 - Group and Treasury Share 
Transactions and AASB 2007-1 Amendments to 
Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 
Interpretation 11 
AASB-I 11 and AASB 2007-1 are effective for annual 
reporting periods commencing on or after 1 March 2007.  
AASB-I 11 addresses whether certain types of share-based 
payment transactions should be accounted for as equity-
settled or as cash settled transactions and specifi es the 
accounting in a subsidiary’s fi nancial statements for share-
based payment arrangements involving equity instruments 
of the parent.  The consolidated entity will apply AASB-I 
11 from 1 January 2008, but it is not expected to have any 
impact on the consolidated entity’s fi nancial statements.

36

Annual Report 2007

AASB 8 Operating Segments and AASB 2007-3 
Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards 
arising from AASB 8 
AASB 8 and AASB 2007-3 are effective for annual reporting 
periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009.  AASB 8 
will result in a change in the approach to segment reporting, 
as it requires adoption of a “management approach” to 
reporting on the fi nancial performance. The information 
being reported will be based on what the key decision-
makers use internally for evaluating segment performance 
and deciding how to allocate resources to operating 
segments.  The consolidated entity will adopt AASB 8 from 1 
January 2009.  Application of AASB 8 may result in different 
segments, segment results and different type of information 
being reported in the segment note of the Financial Report.  
However, it will not affect any of the amounts recognised in 
the fi nancial statements.

AASB-I 12 Service Concession Arrangements, AASB 
2007-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards 
arising from AASB Interpretation 12, revised UIG 4 
Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease 
and revised UIG 129 Service Concession Arrangements
AASB-I 12, AASB 2007-2, UIG 4 and the revised UIG 129 
are all effective for annual reporting periods commencing 
on or after 1 January 2008. AASB-I 12 provides guidance 
on the accounting by operators for public-to-private service 
concession arrangements under which private sector 
entities participate in the development, fi nancing, operation 
and maintenance of infrastructure for the provision of public 
services, such as transport, water and energy facilities. UIG 
4 has been amended to exclude public-to-private service 
concession arrangements from its scope and UIG 129 was 
revised to require some additional disclosures. The Group 
will apply AASB-I 12 and the related amended standards and 
interpretations from 1 July 2008.  Application of AASB-I 12 
will not have any impact on the Group’s fi nancial statements.

Revised AASB 123 Borrowing Costs and AASB 2007-6 
Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising 
from AASB 123 [AASB 1, AASB 101, AASB 107, AASB 
111, AASB 116 & AASB 138 and Interpretations 1 & 12]
The revised AASB 123 is applicable to annual reporting 
periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. It has 
removed the option to expense all borrowing costs and 
when adopted will require the capitalisation of all borrowing 
costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or 
production of a qualifying asset. There will be no impact on 
the fi nancial report of the Group, as the Group does already 
capitalise borrowing costs relating to qualifying assets.

 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 1.  Summary of significant accounting policies 

(a)   Critical accounting estimates and assumptions

(continued)

AASB-I 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes
AASB-I 13 is applicable to annual reporting periods 
commencing on or after 1 July 2008. It provides guidance 
on the accounting for customer loyalty programmes and 
requires that the fair value of the consideration received/
receivable in respect of a sale transaction is allocated 
between the award credits and the other components of 
the sale. The Group does not operate any customer loyalty 
programmes. AASB-I 13 will therefore have no impact on the 
Group’s fi nancial statements. The Group will apply AASB-I 13 
from 1 July 2008.

AASB-I 14 The Limit on a Defi ned Benefi t Asset, 
Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction
AASB-I 14 will be effective for annual reporting periods 
commencing 1 January 2008. It provides guidance on the 
maximum amount that may be recognised as an asset in 
relation to a defi ned benefi t plan and the impact of minimum 
funding requirements on such an asset. None of the Group’s 
defi ned benefi t plans are subject to minimum funding 
requirements and none of them is in a surplus position. 
The Group will apply AASB-I 14 from 1 July 2008, but it is 
not expected to have any impact on the Group’s fi nancial 
statements.

Revised AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements 
and AASB 2007-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting 
Standards arising from AASB 101
The revised AASB 101 that was issued in September 2007 is 
applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 
1 January 2009. It requires the presentation of a statement 
of comprehensive income and makes changes to the 
statement of changes in equity but will not affect any of the 
amounts recognised in the fi nancial statements. If an entity 
has made a prior period adjustment or a reclassifi cation of 
items in the fi nancial statements, it will need to disclose a 
third balance sheet (statement of fi nancial position), this one 
being as at the beginning of the comparative period.

Note 2.  Critical accounting estimates and judgements

Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are 
based on historical experience and other factors, including 
expectations of future events that are believed to be 
reasonable under the circumstances.

The consolidated entity makes estimates and assumptions 
concerning the future.  The resulting accounting estimates 
will, by defi nition, seldom equal the related actual results.  
The estimates and assumptions that have a signifi cant risk 
of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts 
of assets and liabilities within the next fi nancial year are 
discussed below:

(i)  Impairment of assets

The recoverable amount of each Cash Generating Unit 
(CGU) is determined as the higher of value-in-use and 
fair value less costs to sell, in accordance with Note 
1(ab).  These calculations require the use of estimates, 
which have been outlined in Note 1(ab).

Given the nature of the consolidated entity’s mining 
activities, future changes in long-term assumptions 
upon which these estimates are based, may give 
rise to material adjustments to the current or prior 
years.  This could lead to a reversal of part, or all, of 
impairment charges recorded in the current or prior 
years, or the recognition of additional impairment 
charges in the future.  

Due to the nature of the assumptions and their 
signifi cance to the assessment of the recoverable 
amount of each CGU, relatively modest changes in 
one or more assumptions could require a material 
adjustment (negative or positive) to the carrying value 
of the related non-current assets within the next 
reporting period.

The key sources of estimation uncertainty are set out 
below: 

• 

• 

future capital and operating costs for the 
Northern Murray Basin development;

estimates of exchange rates between the 
Australian and US dollars, which are based on 
independent forecasts by recognised economic 
forecasters and which project a medium term 
decline in the Australian dollar against the 
US dollar;

• 

estimates of sales prices for titanium minerals 
and zircon products; and 

• 

timing of access to reserves and resources.

The inter-relationships of the signifi cant assumptions 
upon which estimated future cash fl ows are based, 
however, are such that it is impracticable to disclose 
the extent of the possible effects of a change in a key 
assumption in isolation.

Iluka Resources Limited 

37

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 2.  Critical accounting estimates and 
judgements (continued)

(ii)  Exploration and evaluation expenditure

Expenditure with a value of $34.6 million (2006: 
$6.3 million) which does not form part of the Cash 
Generating Units assessed for impairment has been 
carried forward in accordance with Note 1(y) on the 
basis that exploration and evaluation activities have 
not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable 
assessment of the existence or otherwise of 
economically recoverable reserves and active and 
signifi cant operations in relation to the area are 
continuing.  In the event that signifi cant operations 
cease and/or economically recoverable reserves are 
not assessed as being present, this expenditure will be 
expensed to the Income Statement.

(iii)  Rehabilitation and mine closure provisions

As set out in Note 1(aa), these provisions represent 
the discounted value of the present obligation to 
restore, dismantle and rehabilitate certain items of 
property, plant and equipment.  The discounted value 
refl ects a combination of management’s assessment 
of the cost of performing the work required, the timing 
of the cash fl ows and the discount rate of 6.0 per cent 
(2006: 6.0 per cent).

A change in any, or a combination, of the three key 
assumptions used to determine the provisions could 
have a material impact to the carrying value of the 
provision.  In the case of provisions for assets which 
remain in use, adjustments to the carrying value of the 
provision are offset by a change in the carrying value 
of the related asset.  Where the provisions are for 
assets no longer in use or for obligations arising from 
the production process, the adjustment is refl ected 
directly in the Income Statement.  

(iv)  Income tax

The consolidated entity is subject to income taxes 
in Australia and the United States (US).  Signifi cant 
judgement is required in determining the provision 
for income taxes in each jurisdiction.  There are many 
transactions and calculations for which the ultimate 
determination is not fi nalised until statutory tax 
returns are lodged with the appropriate authorities.  
Where the fi nal tax outcome of these matters is 
different from the amounts that were initially recorded, 
such differences will impact upon the current and 

38

Annual Report 2007

deferred tax provisions in the period in which such 
determination is made which is usually the subsequent 
fi nancial year.

The key assumptions made regarding the income tax 
expense for the current year are the level of research 
and development expenditure that will qualify for 
concessional tax deductions and the level of capital 
gains on asset disposals that can be shielded by 
available capital losses not previously recognised. 
The tax effect of these amounts is $3.5 million and 
$0.5 million respectively.

(b) 

Critical judgements in applying the entity’s accounting 
policies

Recovery of deferred tax assets
Net deferred tax assets of $8.8 million (2006: $11.6 million) 
are carried in respect of the US operations, including 
$5.0 million (2006: $3.7 million) attributable to tax losses.  
Management has assessed that it is probable that these tax 
losses will be recoverable against future taxable profi ts to 
be generated in the US.

Note 3.  Financial risk management

The consolidated entity’s activities expose it to a variety of 
fi nancial risks: market risk (including currency risk, fair value 
interest rate risk and cash fl ow interest rate risk), credit risk and 
liquidity risk.  The consolidated entity’s overall risk management 
program focuses on the unpredictability of fi nancial markets 
and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the fi nancial 
performance of the consolidated entity.  

Financial risk management is managed by a central treasury 
department (Group Treasury) under policies approved by the Board 
of Directors.  

(a) 

 Market risk

(i)  Foreign exchange risk

Foreign exchange risk arises when future commercial 
transactions and recognised assets and liabilities 
are denominated in a currency that is not the entity’s 
functional currency.  The entity manages this by 
borrowing in US dollars to provide a hedge for the 
net US dollar denominated investment in overseas 
operations or through derivative instruments.

 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 3. 

Financial risk management (continued)

(ii)  Cash fl ow and fair value interest rate risk

The consolidated entity operates internationally and is 
exposed to foreign exchange risk arising predominantly 
from currency exposures to the US dollar. The parent 
entity and a controlled entity, Consolidated Rutile 
Limited (CRL), hedge this exposure through the use 
of derivative instruments in accordance with policies 
approved by the respective Boards.

Group sensitivity

At 31 December 2007, had the Australian dollar 
weakened/strengthened by 10 per cent against the US 
dollar compared to the exchange rate at that date of 
87.67 cents with all other variables held constant, the 
consolidated entity’s post tax profi t for the year would 
have been $2.3 million higher/$1.9 million lower (2006: 
$1.5 million higher/$1.2 million lower), mainly as a 
result of foreign exchange gains/losses on translation 
of US dollar denominated trade receivables and 
payables and US dollar denominated borrowings.

Equity would have been $50.0 million lower/$58.1 
million higher (2006: $3.9 million higher/$4.6 
million higher) had the Australian dollar weakened/
strengthened by 10 per cent against the US dollar, 
arising mainly from currency hedging contracts 
designated as cash fl ow hedges. The signifi cant change 
in equity’s sensitivity to movements in the Australian 
dollar/US dollar exchange rates between 2007 and 
2006 is due to the parent entity instigating a currency 
hedging program in December 2007 resulting in an 
increased amount of cash fl ow hedges open at 31 
December 2007. 

Parent entity sensitivity 

At 31 December 2007, had the Australian dollar 
weakened/strengthened by 10 per cent against the 
US dollar compared to the exchange rate at that date 
of 87.67 cents with all other variables held constant, 
the parent entity’s post tax profi t for the year would 
have been $8.4 million lower/$6.8 million higher 
(2006: $11.5 million lower/$9.4 million higher). This 
is as a result of foreign exchange gains/losses on 
the translation of US dollar denominated borrowings. 
The parent entity’s equity would have been $51.5 
million lower/$48.4 million higher (2006: $8.4 million 
lower/$13.4 million higher) had the Australian dollar 
weakened/strengthened by 10 per cent against the US 
dollar, mainly as a result of foreign forward exchange 
contracts designated as cash fl ow hedges in 2007, and 
the translation of US functional currency entity trade 
receivables and payables in 2006.

Interest rate risk arises from the consolidated 
entity’s borrowings.  When managing interest rate 
risk the consolidated entity seeks to minimise its 
overall cost of funds with a preference for variable 
interest rate exposures. During 2007 and 2006, the 
consolidated entity’s borrowings at variable rates were 
denominated in Australian dollars and US dollars.

Borrowings at variable rates expose the consolidated 
entity to cash fl ow interest rate risk while borrowings 
at fi xed rates expose the consolidated entity to fair 
value interest rate risk.

The Group does not account for any fi xed rate fi nancial 
assets and liabilities at fair value through profi t or 
loss, and the Group does not designate derivatives 
(interest rate swaps) as hedging instruments under a 
fair value hedge accounting model. Therefore a change 
in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect 
profi t or loss.

(iii)  Summarised sensitivity analysis 

The following table summarises the sensitivity of the 
Group’s fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities at 31 
December 2007 to foreign exchange risk, based on an 
Australian dollar to US dollar rate of 87.67 cents.  The 
+10.0 per cent sensitivity assumes a rate of 96.43 
cents and the -10.0 per cent sensitivity assumes a rate 
of 78.90 cents.

Iluka Resources Limited 

39

 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 3.  Financial risk management (continued)

Consolidated Entity - 31 December 2007 

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents 
Accounts receivable 
Derivatives  - cash fl ow hedges 

Financial  liabilities 

Trade payables 
Interest-bearing liabilities 

Total increase / (decrease) 

Parent Entity - 31 December 2007 

Financial assets

Accounts receivable 
Derivatives - cash fl ow hedges 

Financial  liabilities 

Trade payables 
Interest-bearing liabilities 

Total increase / (decrease) 

(b) 

Credit risk

  Foreign exchange risk

 -10.0% 

+10.0%

Profi t 
$M 

Equity 
$M 

Profi t 
$M 

Equity
$M

- 
14.9 
- 

1.4 
2.4 
(45.2) 

- 
(12.2) 
- 

(1.1)
(1.9)
54.1

Carrying 
Amount 
$M 

19.9 
190.5 
8.8 

(113.1) 
(618.0) 

(0.7) 
(11.9) 

(1.0) 
(7.6) 

0.6 
9.7 

0.8
6.2

2.3 

(50.0) 

(1.9) 

58.1

44.7 
2.8 

(33.9) 
(618.0) 

3.7 
- 

- 
(43.9) 

(0.2) 
(11.9) 

- 
(7.6) 

(8.4) 

(51.5) 

(3.0) 
- 

0.1 
9.7 

6.8 

-
42.2

-
6.2

48.4

The consolidated entity has no signifi cant concentrations of credit risk.  The consolidated entity has policies in place to ensure that sales 
of products and services are made to customers with an appropriate credit history.  The consolidated entity (excluding CRL) maintains 
an insurance policy to assist in managing the credit risk of its customers. Derivative counterparties and cash transactions are limited to 
high credit quality fi nancial institutions. The consolidated entity has policies that limit the amount of credit exposure to any one fi nancial 
institution.

(c) 

Liquidity risk

Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining suffi cient cash or credit facilities to meet the operating requirements of the 
business.  This is managed through committed undrawn facilities and prudent cash fl ow management.

The tables below analyse the consolidated entity’s and the parent entity’s fi nancial liabilities and net settled derivative fi nancial 
instruments into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the reporting date to the contractual maturity date. The 
amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash fl ows, except for interest rate swaps which are stated as notional 
principal amounts. Balances due within 12 months equal their carrying balances, as the impact of discounting is not signifi cant.

Consolidated Entity - At 31 December 2007 

Trade and other payables 
Interest-bearing liabilities 
Interest rate swaps 

Parent Entity - At 31 December 2007

Trade and other payables 
Interest-bearing liabilities 
Interest rate swaps 

40

Annual Report 2007

Less than 
1 year 
$M 

Between  
1 and 2 years 
$M 

Between  
2 and 5 years 
$M 

Over 5 years
$M

113.1 
230.7 
- 

33.9 
230.7 
- 

- 
121.7 
- 

- 
121.7 
- 

- 
181.2 
56.9 

- 
181.2 
56.9 

-
85.4
85.4

-
85.4
85.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 3.  Financial risk management (continued)

The tables below analyse the consolidated entity’s derivative fi nancial instruments that will be settled on a gross basis into relevant 
maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the balance sheet to the contractual maturity date.  The amounts disclosed in the 
table are the contractual undiscounted cash fl ows.   

Consolidated Entity - At 31 December 2007 

Forward foreign exchange contracts - cash fl ow hedges
- 
- 

infl ow (A$M) 
outfl ow (US$M) 

Collar Options - cash fl ow hedges
- 
- 

infl ow (A$M) 
outfl ow (US$M) 

Consolidated Entity - At 31 December 2006

Forward foreign exchange contracts - cash fl ow hedges
- 
- 

infl ow (A$M) 
outfl ow (US$M) 

Parent Entity - At 31 December 2007

Forward foreign exchange contracts - cash fl ow hedges
- 
- 

infl ow (A$M) 
outfl ow (US$M) 

Collar Options - cash fl ow hedges
- 
- 

infl ow (A$M) 
outfl ow (US$M) 

Parent Entity - At 31 December 2006

Forward foreign exchange contracts - cash fl ow hedges
- 
- 

infl ow (A$M) 
outfl ow (US$M) 

(d) 

Fair value estimation

Less than 1 year 
$M 

Between 1 and 2 years
$M

55.7 
43.1 

402.6 
353.0 

37.4 
26.5 

- 
- 

402.6 
353.0 

- 
- 

20.5
16.9

200.7 
176.0 

15.5
10.5

-
-

200.7 
176.0 

-
-

The fair value of fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure purposes.

The fair value of fi nancial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading and available-for-sale 
securities) is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date.  The quoted market price used for fi nancial assets held by the 
consolidated entity is the current bid price.

Derivative contracts classifi ed as held for trading are fair valued by comparing the contracted rate to the current market rate for a 
contract with the same remaining period to maturity.

The fair value of fi nancial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is determined 
using valuation techniques.  The consolidated entity uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market 
conditions existing at each balance date.  Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments are used for long-term debt 
instruments held.  Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash fl ows, are used to determine fair value for the remaining 
fi nancial instruments.  The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash fl ows.  The 
fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange market rates at the balance sheet date.

The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables is a reasonable approximation of their fair values due 
to the short-term nature of trade receivables.  The fair value of fi nancial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting 
the future contractual cash fl ows at the current market interest rate that is available to the consolidated entity for similar fi nancial 
instruments.

Iluka Resources Limited 

41

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 4.  Segment information

(a) 

Primary Reporting Format - Geographical Segments

2007 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

WA 

MB 

QLD - CRL 

VA 

FL/G 

MAC 

Other 

Continuing 
operations 
$M 

Discontinued 
operations
$M 

Sales to external customers  

575.2 

87.2 

124.6 

94.9 

16.0 

- 

Other revenue/income  

11.2 

- 

0.2 

0.6 

- 

19.9 

Total segment revenue/income 

586.4 

87.2 

124.8 

95.5 

16.0 

19.9 

- 

3.9 

3.9 

897.9 

35.8 

933.7 

Total segment result  

69.8 

8.9 

30.5 

13.7 

5.2 

19.6 

(24.0) 

123.7 

Rehabilitation and restoration 
accretion expense 

Interest and fi nance costs 

Interest revenue 

Profi t before income tax 

Income tax expense 

Net profi t for the year 

Segment assets  

Unallocated assets 

Total assets 

Segment liabilities  

Unallocated liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Acquisition of property, plant and
equipment and other non-current 
segment assets 

(16.6) 

(43.8) 

1.7 

65.0 

(15.5) 

49.5 

861.1  594.4 

198.1 

83.3 

21.8 

13.7 

41.4 

1,813.8 

22.6 

1,836.4 

326.6 

22.1 

46.9 

15.8 

22.8 

- 

4.4 

438.6 

671.0 

1,109.6 

76.2 

26.5 

7.0 

5.5 

2.7 

- 

17.8 

135.7 

Depreciation and amortisation expense 

90.7 

25.3 

14.5 

13.0 

0.2 

0.4 

0.8 

144.9 

Other non-cash expenses 

36.7 

1.2 

3.1 

0.2 

- 

- 

- 

41.2 

WA - Western Australia Operations

MB - Murray Basin (New South Wales/Victoria - Australia)

QLD - CRL Queensland, Australia

VA - Virginia, United States of America

FL/G - Florida/Georgia, United States of America

MAC - Mining Area C Iron Ore (Western Australia)

40.7 

- 

40.7 

16.0 

(0.5) 

- 

- 

15.5 

(4.6) 

10.9 

31.6 

- 

31.6 

6.8 

- 

6.8 

0.5 

3.0 

0.1 

Consolidated

$M

938.6

35.8

974.4

139.7

(17.1)

(43.8)

1.7

80.5

(20.1)

60.4

1,845.4

22.6

1,868.0

445.4

671.0

1,116.4

136.2

147.9

41.3

Other - Includes New South Wales and coal compensation, exploration, project expenses and other corporate costs incurred not attributable to any of the 
            group’s operating regions

42

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 4.  Segment information (continued)

2006 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

WA 

MB 

QLD - CRL 

VA 

FL/G 

MAC 

Other 

Continuing 
operations 
$M 

Discontinued 
operations
$M 

Sales to external customers  

Other revenue/income  

Total segment revenue/income 

Segment result before notable items 
(and impairment charges)  

696.1 

1.1 

697.2 

148.8 

Closure costs and impairment charges 

(60.0) 

Coal compensation 

Profi t on sale of Brunswick property 

Iron oxide provision 

Write-off of assets 

- 

- 

(25.0) 

- 

0.1 

0.1 

125.9 

111.2 

0.4 

0.5 

126.3 

111.7 

- 

19.1 

19.1 

- 

13.2 

13.2 

962.1 

64.3 

1,026.4 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

33.1 

27.9 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(4.6) 

18.7 

(43.7) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

12.5 

- 

- 

- 

28.9 

29.9 

58.8 

(25.1) 

(39.9) 

- 

29.9 

- 

- 

Total segment result  

63.8 

(4.6) 

33.1 

27.9 

(35.1) 

18.7 

(31.2) 

Rehabilitation and restoration 
accretion expense 

Interest and fi nance costs 

Interest revenue 

Profi t before income tax 

Income tax expense 

Net profi t for the year 

Segment assets  

Unallocated assets 

Total assets 

Unallocated liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Acquisition of property, plant and 
equipment and other non-current 
segment assets 

889.1 

554.8 

203.4 

111.0 

19.1 

13.2 

25.8 

1,816.4 

Segment liabilities  

315.0 

13.0 

40.3 

15.4 

38.7 

- 

28.8 

91.1 

61.7 

17.1 

4.8 

- 

- 

18.6 

193.3 

Depreciation and amortisation expense 

76.9 

14.6 

14.8 

13.2 

0.9 

0.4 

Other non-cash expenses 

33.5 

0.8 

2.2 

1.8 

12.8 

- 

0.4 

0.4 

121.2 

51.5 

159.7 

(99.9) 

12.5 

29.9 

(25.0) 

(4.6) 

72.6 

(13.0)  

(29.0) 

1.6 

32.2 

(10.1) 

22.1 

14.9 

1,831.3 

451.2 

690.1 

1,141.3 

Consolidated

$M

1,003.2

64.3

1,067.5

173.6

(99.9)

12.5

29.9

(25.0)

(4.6)

86.5

(13.4)

(29.0)

1.6

45.7

(14.2)

31.5

1,849.6

14.9

1,864.5

457.9

690.1

1,148.0

197.1

127.3

51.5

41.1 

- 

41.1 

13.9 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

13.9 

(0.4) 

- 

- 

13.5 

(4.1) 

9.4 

33.2 

- 

33.2 

6.7 

- 

6.7 

3.8 

6.1 

- 

Iluka Resources Limited 

43

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 4.  Segment information (continued)
(b) 

Secondary reporting format - business segments

Segment revenue from 
sales to external customers 

Segment assets 

Acquisition of property, 
plant & equipment & other
non-current segment assets

Continuing operations
Titanium minerals and zircon 
Iron ore royalty 

Discontinued operations
Coal 

Total 

2007 
$M 

897.9 
- 

897.9 

40.7 

40.7 

938.6 

2006 
$M 

962.1 
- 

962.1 

41.1 

41.1 

2007 
$M 

1,800.1 
13.7 

1,813.8 

31.6 

31.6 

2006 
$M 

1,803.2 
13.2 

1,816.4 

33.2 

33.2 

1,003.2 

1,845.4 

1,849.6 

Segment revenue is derived from sales to external customers domiciled in various geographical regions.   
Details of segment revenue by location of customers are as follows: 

2007 
$M 

135.7 
- 

135.7 

0.5 

0.5 

136.2 

2006
$M

193.3
-

193.3

3.8

3.8

197.1

  Consolidated

2007 
$M 

199.1 
306.2 
342.0 
50.6 

897.9 

40.7 

938.6 

2006
$M

211.2
329.5
338.5
82.9

962.1

41.1

1,003.2

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

897.9 

962.1 

258.1 

266.5

1.7 
0.1 
19.9 
0.5 

22.2 

1.6 
- 
19.1 
0.6 

21.3 

17.8 
1.1 
- 
0.3 

19.2 

78.1
0.9
-
0.5

79.5

920.1 

983.4 

277.3 

346.0

40.7 

41.1 

- 

11.3 
2.0 
0.3 
- 

13.6 

29.9 
12.5 
0.6 
- 

43.0 

4.9 
- 
0.1 
5.5 

10.5 

-

-
-
-
-

-

Continuing operations
North America 
Europe 
Asia 
Australia 

Discontinued operation
Australia 

Total sales revenue 

Note 5.  Revenue 

From continuing operations
Sales revenue
Sale of goods 

Other revenue
Interest 
Management fee income 
Royalty income 
Rental income 

From discontinued operation
Sales revenue
Sale of goods 

Note 6.  Other income
Net gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment 
Coal compensation receipts 
Sundry income 
Net foreign exchange gains 

44

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Consolidated 

Parent entity

Note 7.  Expenses

From continuing operations

Cost of production* 
Depreciation 
Amortisation 

Cost of sales of goods  

Corporate administration and fi nance 
Marketing and selling including government royalties 
Research and technical support 
Exploration and evaluation 

Expenses, excluding borrowing costs, closure costs and impairment
charges from continuing operations 

* Included in 2006 cost of production is $25.0 million (consolidated entity) and $9.4 million  

(parent entity) relating to the rehabilitation of iron oxide in tailings dams

2007 
$M 

592.0 
104.8 
40.1 

736.9 
19.5 
28.2 
9.9 
13.8 

2006 
$M 

646.3 
85.6 
35.6 

767.5 
25.6 
35.5 
6.3 
12.8 

2007 
$M 

171.2 
31.8 
12.0 

215.0 
18.0 
9.0 
9.9 
- 

808.3 

847.7 

251.9 

Expenses, excluding borrowing costs, closure costs and impairment
charges from discontinued operation 

24.7 

27.2 

Profi t (loss) before income tax includes the following specifi c expenses:

Florida/Georgia closure costs and impairment charges

Provision for diminution in asset values 
Rehabilitation and closure provisions 

Total Florida/Georgia closure costs and impairment charges 

Western Australian and Murray Basin impairment charges
South West - provision for diminution in asset values 
Murray Basin - write-off of assets 

Total Western Australian and Murray Basin impairment charges 

Total closure costs and impairment charges 

Borrowing costs from continuing operations

Interest and fi nance charges paid/payable 
Rehabilitation and restoration accretion expense 
Amortisation of deferred borrowing costs 
Interest capitalised 

Borrowing costs expensed from continuing operations 

Borrowing costs from discontinued operation  
(rehabilitation and restoration accretion expense) 

Operating lease expense 

Foreign exchange gains and losses

Net foreign exchange gains included in other income 
Exchange gains on foreign currency borrowings  
Net foreign exchange losses included in corporate costs 

Defi ned contribution superannuation expense 

Net realisable value of inventories recognised as expense 

Employee benefi ts expense 

- 
- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

43.5 
16.6 
0.3 
- 

60.4 

0.5 

10.9 

- 
- 
(1.1) 

(1.1) 

15.8 

12.3 

171.8 

27.6 
12.3 

39.9 

60.0 
4.6 

64.6 

104.5 

42.1 
13.0 
0.4 
(13.5) 

42.0 

0.4 

15.4 

- 
- 
(2.4) 

(2.4) 

14.5 

0.5 

166.8 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

42.7 
5.6 
0.3 
- 

48.6 

- 

2.8 

5.5 
8.0 
- 

13.5 

13.3 

6.4 

62.0 

2006
$M

196.6
27.5
7.4

231.5
19.8
10.5
6.3
-

268.1

-

-
-

-

60.0
-

60.0

60.0

41.4
2.8
0.4
(13.5)

31.1

-

3.6

-
10.5
(0.4)

10.1

14.5

0.5

62.7

Iluka Resources Limited 

45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 8.  Income tax

(a) 

Income tax expense (benefi t) 
Current tax 
Deferred tax 
Under (over) provided in prior years 

Income tax expense (benefi t) is attributable to: 
Profi t from continuing operations 
Profi t from discontinued operations 

Aggregate income tax expense (benefi t) 

Deferred income tax (revenue) expense included 
in income tax expense comprises:
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax assets (Note 19) 
(Decrease) increase in deferred tax liabilities (Note 28) 

(b)  Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense (benefi t) 

to prima facie tax payable
Profi t (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense 
Profi t from discontinued operation before income tax expense 

Tax at the Australian tax rate of 30% (2006: 30%) 
Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible (taxable) 
in calculating taxable income: 
Unfranked dividends received 
Tax base of foreign exchange hedge contracts 
Net foreign exchange losses 
Capital gains shielded by capital losses 
Research and development 
Other non-deductible / non-assessable items 
Benefi t of tax losses not recognised 

Difference in overseas tax rates 
Under (over) provision in prior years* 

Total income tax expense (benefi t) 

* 

Included in the net over provision of income tax in prior years is an amount of 
$1.7 million (2006: $3.7 million) for the consolidated entity relating to additional research 
and development deductions identifi ed subsequent to the 31 December 2006 and 
31 December 2005 year ends.

(c) 

Amounts recognised directly in equity
Aggregate current and deferred tax arising in the reporting period and 
not recognised in net profi t or loss but directly debited or credited to equity

Net deferred tax - debited (credited) directly to equity 
(Notes 19 and 28) 

46

Annual Report 2007

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

24.4 
(4.8) 
0.5 

20.1 

15.5 
4.6 

20.1 

1.5 
(6.3) 

(4.8) 

65.0 
15.5 

80.5 

24.1 

- 
- 
- 
(0.5) 
(3.5) 
0.6 
- 

20.7 

(1.1) 
0.5 

20.1 

35.2 
(16.2) 
(4.8) 

14.2 

10.1 
4.1 

14.2 

4.4 
(20.6) 

(16.2) 

32.2 
13.5 

45.7 

13.7 

0.9 
(0.2) 
- 
- 
(6.1) 
0.3 
8.5 

17.1 

1.9 
(4.8) 

14.2 

(17.1) 
10.4 
(1.9) 

(8.6) 

(8.6) 
- 

(8.6) 

- 
10.4 

10.4 

(4.7) 
- 

(4.7) 

(1.4) 

- 
- 
(2.2) 
- 
(3.5) 
0.4 
- 

(6.7) 

- 
(1.9) 

(8.6) 

19.2
(32.1)
2.6

(10.3)

(10.3)
-

(10.3)

-
(32.1)

(32.1)

(2.7)
-

(2.7)

(0.8)

-
-
(3.0)
-
(6.0)
-
(3.1)

(12.9)

-
2.6

(10.3)

(8.8) 

(1.9) 

(7.2) 

(5.5)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 8.  Income tax (continued)

(d) 

Tax losses

Unused capital losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised relating to the wholly-owned Australian controlled entities 
of approximately $120.0 million (tax at the Australian tax rate of 30%: $36.0 million). The benefi t of these unused capital losses will 
only be obtained if these entities derive future assessable income of a nature and amount suffi cient to enable the benefi t to be realised 
and these entities continue to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation and no changes in tax legislation 
adversely effect these entities in realising the benefi t from the deduction for the losses.

Unused revenue losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised relating to the United States controlled entities of 
approximately US$58.7 million (tax at the US tax rate of 20%: US$11.7 million). United States controlled entities are not part of the 
Australian tax consolidation group.

(e) 

Tax consolidation legislation

Iluka Resources Limited and its wholly-owned Australian controlled entities have implemented the tax consolidation legislation as of 1 
January 2004.  The accounting policy in relation to this legislation is set out in Note 1.

On adoption of the tax consolidation legislation, the entities in the tax consolidated group entered into a tax sharing agreement which, in 
the opinion of the Directors, limits the joint and several liability of the wholly-owned entities in the case of a default by the head entity, 
Iluka Resources Limited.

The entities have also entered into a tax funding agreement under which the wholly-owned entities fully compensate Iluka Resources 
Limited for any current tax payable assumed and are compensated by Iluka Resources Limited for any current tax receivable and 
deferred tax assets relating to unused tax losses or unused tax credits that are transferred to Iluka Resources Limited under the tax 
consolidation legislation.  The funding amounts are determined by reference to the amounts recognised in the wholly-owned entities’ 
fi nancial statements.

The amounts receivable/payable under the tax funding agreement are due upon receipt of the funding advice from the head entity, 
which is issued as soon as practicable after the end of each fi nancial year.  The head entity may also require payment of interim funding 
amounts to assist with its obligations to pay tax instalments.  The funding amounts are recognised as current intercompany receivables 
or payables.

Note 9.  Discontinued operation

(a)  Description

In February 2007, Iluka announced its intention to consider the divestment of its 50 per cent interest in the Narama Coal joint venture. 
On 7 August 2007, Iluka announced that it had reached agreement to sell its interest in the joint venture. The interest in the joint venture 
was sold on 15 January 2008 with effect from 1 January 2008 and is reported in this fi nancial report as a discontinued operation. The 
estimated profi t/gain on sale to be recognised in 2008 is $30.3 million subject to being able to utilise unused capital losses.

Financial information relating to the discontinued operation is set out below.  Further information is set out in Note 4  - Segment 
Information.  

Consolidated

(b) 

Financial performance and cash fl ow information

Revenue (Note 5) 
Expenses 

Profi t before income tax 

Income tax expense 

Profi t from discontinued operations 

Net cash infl ow from operating activities 
Net cash outfl ow from investing activities  

Net increase in cash generated by the division 

2007 

$M 

40.7 
(25.2) 

15.5 

(4.6) 

10.9 

21.4 
(0.3) 

21.1 

2006

$M

41.1
(27.6)

13.5

(4.1)

9.4

22.7
(0.9)

21.8

Iluka Resources Limited 

47

 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 9.  Discontinued operation (continued)

(c) 

Carrying amounts of assets and liabilities

Property, plant and equipment 

Trade receivables 

Inventories 

Total assets 

Trade creditors 

Provision for rehabilitation and mine closure 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

Note 10. Current assets - Cash and cash equivalents

Cash at bank and in hand 

Deposits at call 

Deposits at call

The deposits are bearing fl oating interest rates between 1.7 per cent and 
6.8 per cent (2006: 2.8 per cent and 7.0 per cent) on US dollar and 
Australian dollar denominated deposits.

Note 11. Current assets - Receivables

Trade receivables 

Other debtors 

Prepayments 

Goods and services tax (GST) 

48

Annual Report 2007

Consolidated

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

26.9 

3.0 

1.7 

31.6 

- 

(6.8) 

(6.8) 

29.4

3.6

0.2

33.2

(0.2)

(6.5)

(6.7)

24.8 

26.5

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

17.5 

2.4 

19.9 

15.1 

2.3 

17.4 

- 

- 

- 

-

-

-

160.0 

14.7 

7.7 

8.1 

190.5 

198.5 

21.2 

7.9 

4.6 

232.2 

33.7 

3.9 

4.9 

2.2 

44.7 

45.9

3.3

5.2

1.7

56.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 11. Current assets - Receivables (continued)

(a) 

Effective interest rates and credit risk

Information concerning the credit risk of both current and non current receivables is set out in the non current receivables note 
(Note 16).

(b) 

Foreign exchange and interest rate risk

The carrying amounts of the consolidated entity’s and parent entity’s receivables are denominated in the following currencies:

In millions

US Dollars 

Australian Dollars 

Euros 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 

2006 

2007 

2006

136.0 

32.5 

1.8 

151.2 

34.4 

2.8 

29.0 

11.0 

0.4 

36.1

10.2

0.3

For an analysis of the sensitivity of trade and other receivables to foreign exchange and interest rate risk refer to Note 3.

(c) 

Fair value and credit risk

Due to the short-term nature of these receivables, their carrying amount is approximate to their fair value.

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying amount of each class of receivables mentioned above.  
The consolidated entity does not hold any collateral as security.  Refer to Note 3 for more information on the risk management policy of 
the consolidated entity.

Note 12. Current assets - Inventories

Consumable stores

-   at cost 

Work in progress

-  at cost 

-  at net realisable value 

Finished goods

-  at cost 

-  at net realisable value 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

32.9 

29.2 

8.0 

9.8

82.9 

19.2 

102.1 

93.9 

91.0 

184.9 

319.9 

133.9 

1.8 

135.7 

82.4 

2.1 

84.5 

249.4 

22.4 

17.4 

39.8 

18.9 

4.0 

22.9 

70.7 

41.3

1.8

43.1

23.8

1.0

24.8

77.7

Write-downs of inventories to net realisable value recognised as an expense during the year ended 31 December 2007 amounted to $12.3 million (2006: $0.5 
million) for the consolidated entity and $6.4 million (2006: $0.5 million) for the parent entity.  

Iluka Resources Limited 

49

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 13. Derivative financial instruments 

Current assets

Fair value gain on foreign exchange derivatives  

Non-current assets

Fair value gain on foreign exchange derivatives  

(a) 

Instruments used by the consolidated entity 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

7.8 

1.0 

2006 
$M 

3.5 

1.7 

2007 
$M 

2.1 

0.7 

2006
$M

-

-

The consolidated entity is party to derivative fi nancial instruments in the normal course of business in order to manage foreign exchange 
and interest rate exposures. In accordance with the consolidated entity’s fi nancial risk management policies (refer to Note 3), hedging 
of foreign currency exposures is effected through forward exchange contracts and foreign currency options. 

(i)  Forward exchange contracts and foreign currency options - cash fl ow hedges

Sales revenue of the consolidated entity is mainly denominated in US dollars. Given the predominately Australian dollar cost 
base of the business, these US dollar sales create a foreign exchange exposure in terms of earnings and cash fl ow. In order to 
protect against this exposure, the consolidated entity has entered into forward exchange contracts and foreign currency options to 
forward sell US dollars.  

These forward exchange contracts and foreign currency options are hedging highly probable forecast sales over a two year 
timeframe. The contracts are timed to mature when receipts from customers are expected to be received.

The portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognised directly in 
equity.  When the cash fl ows occur, the consolidated entity adjusts the initial measurement of the component recognised in the 
balance sheet by the related amount deferred in equity.

Consolidated Entity

The group net asset position of foreign exchange derivatives at 31 December 2007 was $8.8 million (2006: $5.2 million).  During the 
year ended 31 December 2007, the consolidated entity transferred a total gain of $34.0 million (2006: $28.9 million) to the Income 
Statement from equity.  This gain predominantly represented the gains attributable to delivered contracts and those relating to 
contracts terminated early in August 2006 which were due for delivery in the year.

Parent Entity

The net asset position at 31 December 2007 was $2.8 million (2006: $Nil).  During the year ended 31 December 2007, a total of 
$26.6 million (2006: $24.6 million) was transferred to the Income Statement from equity.

On 25 August 2006, the parent entity closed out its hedge book. The parent entity reinstated currency hedging activities on 13 
December 2007. A profi t of $37.7 million had been generated in the prior period upon closure of the hedge book, and of the balance 
deferred in reserves, the remaining $26.6 million has been recognised during 2007 as revenue in line with the delivery dates of the 
original contracts.

(b) 

Credit risk exposures 

The consolidated entity has no signifi cant concentrations of credit risk. Derivative counterparties and cash transactions are limited to 
high credit quality fi nancial institutions. The consolidated entity (excluding CRL) has policies that limit the amount of credit exposure to 
any one fi nancial institution.

For an analysis of the exposure to credit risk refer to Note 27, and for further information regarding the consolidated entity’s risk 
management policy refer to Note 3.

(c) 

Interest rate and foreign exchange risk 

For an analysis of the sensitivity of derivatives to interest rate and foreign exchange risk refer to Note 3.

50

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 14. Current assets - Current tax assets

Current tax assets 

12.7 

- 

12.4 

-

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

The current tax asset has not been offset against the current tax liability as 
the respective amounts relate to different group entities where settlement 
on a net basis is not possible (Refer Note 26)

Note 15. Current assets - Other

Deferred overburden removal 

Note 16. Non-current assets - Receivables

Loans to controlled entities 
Prepayments 
Other debtors  

11.2 

17.9 

6.7 

0.5

- 
- 
- 

- 

- 
0.2 
3.6 

3.8 

289.2 
- 
- 

289.2 

315.0
0.2
- 

315.2

(a) 

Impaired receivables and receivables past due

None of the non-current receivables are impaired or past due but not impaired.

(b) 

Credit risk

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying 
amount of each class of receivables mentioned above.  The consolidated entity 
does not hold any collateral as security.  Refer to Note 3 for more information 
on the risk management policy of the consolidated entity. 

Note 17. Non-current assets - Other financial assets

Retirement benefi ts surplus (Note 35) 
Shares in controlled entities (Note 39) 

1.2 
- 

1.2 

1.2 
- 

1.2 

- 
849.2 

849.2 

-
849.2 

849.2

Iluka Resources Limited 

51

 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 18. Non-current assets - Property, plant and equipment

Land &  
Buildings 

$M 

Plant, 
Machinery &  
Equipment 

Mine 
Reserves & 
 Development 

Exploration & 
 Evaluation 

Project
Development
Expenditure 

$M 

$M 

$M 

$M 

86.7 

(18.4) 

68.3 

68.3 

6.5 

(6.6) 

- 

(8.0) 

(0.9) 

(0.2) 

6.5 

65.6 

87.7 

(22.1) 

65.6 

65.6 

9.2 

(4.6) 

- 

(1.1) 

(0.1) 

5.1 

74.1 

88.9 

(14.8) 

74.1 

1,235.3 

(655.5) 

579.8 

579.8 

74.0 

(0.4) 

- 

(73.1) 

(77.8) 

(7.7) 

152.0 

646.8 

1,384.2 

(737.4) 

646.8 

646.8 

49.2 

(0.2) 

- 

(91.2) 

(5.8) 

155.4 

754.2 

657.3 

(334.6) 

322.7 

322.7 

32.8 

- 

- 

(11.1) 

(40.7) 

(0.4) 

3.8 

307.1 

680.6 

(373.5) 

307.1 

307.1 

54.0 

- 

- 

(51.0) 

(0.5) 

42.9 

352.5 

1,539.9 

(785.7) 

754.2 

773.9 

(421.4) 

352.5 

58.9 

- 

58.9 

58.9 

7.0 

- 

(1.7) 

- 

- 

- 

(4.5) 

59.7 

59.7 

- 

59.7 

59.7 

5.5 

- 

(1.1) 

- 

- 

(37.4) 

26.7 

26.7 

- 

26.7 

Total

$M

2,363.5

(1,060.5)

1,303.0

1,303.0

193.3

(7.0)

(1.7)

(92.2)

(119.5)

(8.3)

(1.3)

1,266.3

2,450.6

(1,184.3)

1,266.3

1,266.3

135.7

(4.8)

(1.1)

(143.3)

(6.4)

-

325.3 

(52.0) 

273.3 

273.3 

73.0 

- 

- 

- 

(0.1) 

- 

(159.1) 

187.1 

238.4 

(51.3) 

187.1 

187.1 

17.8 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(166.0) 

38.9 

1,246.4

38.9 

- 

38.9 

2,468.3

(1,221.9)

1,246.4

Consolidated 

At 1 January 2006

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation 

Net written down value 

Year ended 31 December 2006

Opening written down value 

Additions 

Disposals 

Write-off of exploration expenditure 

Write-offs and impairment charges 

Depreciation/amortisation expense 

Foreign currency exchange differences 

Transfers/reclassifi cations 

Closing written down value 

At 31 December 2006

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation* 

Net written down value 

Year ended 31 December 2007

Opening written down value 

Additions 

Disposals 

Write-off of exploration expenditure 

Depreciation/amortisation expense 

Foreign currency exchange differences 

Transfers/reclassifi cations 

Closing written down value 

At 31 December 2007

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation* 

Net written down value 

*  Includes impairment charges.

52

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 18. Non-current assets - Property, plant and equipment (continued) 

Parent Entity 

At 1 January 2006 

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation 

Net written down value 

Year ended 31 December 2006

Opening written down value 

Additions 

Disposals 

Depreciation/amortisation expense 

Impairment charges 

Closing written down value 

At 31 December 2006

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation 

Net written down value 

Year ended 31 December 2007 

Opening written down value 

Additions 

Disposals 

Depreciation/amortisation expense 

Transfers/reclassifi cations 

Closing written down value 

At 31 December 2007

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation* 

Net written down value 

*  Includes impairment charges

38.0 

(4.8) 

33.2 

33.2 

6.8 

(0.3) 

(0.2) 

(8.0) 

31.5 

44.7 

(13.2) 

31.5 

31.5 

9.0 

(4.0) 

(0.1) 

- 

36.4 

41.2 

(4.8) 

36.4 

Land &  
Buildings 

$M 

Plant, 
Machinery &  
Equipment 

Mine
Reserves & 
 Development 

$M 

$M 

Total

$M

560.4

(286.2)

274.2

274.2

49.2

(0.6)

(34.9)

(60.0)

227.9

608.9

(381.0)

227.9

227.9

64.1

(4.1)

(43.8)

2.1

246.2

430.0 

(216.4) 

213.6 

213.6 

20.8 

(0.3) 

(23.0) 

(45.5) 

165.6 

449.9 

(284.3) 

165.6 

165.6 

7.2 

(0.1) 

(22.7) 

21.5 

171.5 

92.4 

(65.0) 

27.4 

27.4 

21.6 

- 

(11.7) 

(6.5) 

30.8 

114.3 

(83.5) 

30.8 

30.8 

47.9 

- 

(21.0) 

(19.4) 

38.3 

455.5 

140.1 

636.8

(284.0) 

(101.8) 

(390.6)

171.5 

38.3 

246.2

Iluka Resources Limited 

53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 18. Non-current assets - Property, plant and equipment (continued)

Mine reserves and development

Included in mine reserves and development are amounts totalling $229.8 million for the consolidated entity and $19.0 million for the parent 
entity (2006: $164.7 million and $21.8 million respectively) which have not been depreciated as mining of the related area of interest has not 
yet commenced.

Plant, machinery and equipment

Included in plant, machinery and equipment are amounts totalling $25.7 million for the consolidated entity and $7.8 million for the parent 
entity (2006: $39.8 million and $17.2 million respectively) which relate to assets under construction.  These amounts are not currently being 
depreciated as the assets are not ready for use.

Project development expenditure

Project development expenditure at 31 December 2007 comprises $11.9 million relating to Murray Basin Stage 2 and $27.0 million relating to 
the Jacinth-Ambrosia project. These amounts were not depreciated as the projects had not been commissioned.

Non-current assets pledged as security

Refer to Note 27 for information on non-current assets pledged as security by the parent entity or its controlled entities.

Note 19. Non-current assets - Deferred tax assets

The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to: 

Amounts recognised in profi t or loss 

Employee benefi ts 
Rehabilitation provisions 
Other provisions 
Borrowing expenses 
Accruals 
Tax revenue losses* 

Other 

Amounts recognised directly in equity

Cash fl ow hedges 
Set-off of deferred tax liabilities pursuant to set-off provisions (Note 28) 

Net deferred tax assets 

Movements:

Opening balance at 1 January 
Credited (charged) to the income statement (Note 8) 
Over (under) provision in prior years 
Credited (charged) directly to equity (Note 31) 

Closing balance at 31 December 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

10.9 
85.7 
4.8 
3.8 
1.4 
5.0 

- 

111.6 

(1.8) 
(99.9) 

9.9 

14.9 
(1.5) 
(2.2) 
(1.3) 

9.9 

8.0 
73.9 
6.2 
- 
1.9 
4.2 

1.3 

95.5 

- 
(80.6) 

14.9 

22.6 
(4.4) 
0.3 
(3.6) 

14.9 

3.6 
28.7 
0.8 
- 
0.6 
- 

- 

33.7 

3.6
21.8
0.7
-
1.1
-

-

27.2

- 
(33.7) 

-
(27.2)

- 

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

-

-
-
-
-

-

*  The balance is attributable to carried forward US tax losses which are probable of recoupment in ensuing years.

54

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 20. Non-current assets - Intangible assets

Consolidated 

At 1 January 2006

Cost 

Accumulated amortisation  

Net written down value  

Year ended 31 December 2006

Opening written down value 

Amortisation charge 

Closing written down value 

At 31 December 2006 

Cost 

Accumulated amortisation 

Net written down value  

Year ended 31 December 2007

Opening written down value 

Amortisation charge 

Closing written down value  

At 31 December 2007

Cost 

Accumulated amortisation 

Net written down value  

Patents,  
trademarks & 
licences  
$M 

Royalty
entitlement 
asset 
$M 

17.2 

(7.8) 

9.4 

9.4 

(1.3) 

8.1 

17.2 

(9.1) 

8.1 

8.1 

(1.2) 

6.9 

17.2 

(10.3) 

6.9 

10.0 

(0.9) 

9.1 

9.1 

(0.4) 

8.7 

10.0 

(1.3) 

8.7 

8.7 

(0.4) 

8.3 

10.0 

(1.7) 

8.3 

Total
$M

27.2

(8.7)

18.5

18.5

(1.7)

16.8

27.2

(10.4)

16.8

16.8

(1.6)

15.2

27.2

(12.0)

15.2

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

Note 21. Non-current assets - Inventories

Consumable stores

-  at cost 

Note 22. Non-current assets - Other

- 

5.5 

Deferred overburden 

0.7 

0.7 

- 

- 

2.7

-

Iluka Resources Limited 

55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 23. Current liabilities - Payables 

Trade payables 
Accrued expenses 
Annual leave accruals 
Other payables  

(a) 

Foreign currency risk

The carrying amounts of the consolidated entity’s and parent entity’s 
trade and other payables are denominated in the following currencies:

In millions

US Dollars 
Australian Dollars 

For an analysis of the sensitivity of trade and other payables to foreign 
currency risk refer to Note 3.

Note 24. Current liabilities - Interest-bearing liabilities

Secured

Bank loans 

Total secured interest-bearing liabilities 

Unsecured

Bank loans 
Trade fi nance facility 
Receivables acquisition facility  
Senior notes 1996 

Total unsecured interest-bearing liabilities 

Further details of the security relating to each of the secured liabilities and 
further information on the bank overdrafts and bank loans are set out in Note 27.

(a)   Risk Exposures

Details of the consolidated entity’s exposure to interest rate changes on 
interest-bearing liabilities are set out in Note 27.

Note 25. Current liabilities - Provisions
Employee benefi ts  
Rehabilitation and mine closure 
Other provisions 

Movements in each class of provision during the current fi nancial year, other 
than employee benefi ts, are set out in Note 29.

Note 26. Current liabilities - Current tax liabilities
Income tax 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

40.3 
59.6 
13.2 
- 

2006 
$M 

56.6 
64.0 
12.7 
0.1 

113.1 

133.4 

2007 
$M 

8.4 
20.1 
5.4 
- 

33.9 

2006
$M

11.2
25.4
5.3
-

41.9

14.4 
96.1 

14.6 
115.0 

1.4 
31.9 

1.5
40.1

- 

- 

51.3 
77.1 
68.1 
34.2 

230.7 

230.7 

5.5 

5.5 

56.9 
63.0 
68.6 
- 

188.5 

194.0 

- 

- 

51.3 
77.1 
68.1 
34.2 

230.7 

230.7 

-

-

56.9
63.0
68.6
-

188.5

188.5

13.8 
38.8 
2.6 

55.2 

10.8 
45.7 
1.4 

57.9 

5.7 
8.7 
2.5 

16.9 

4.5
13.5
0.9

18.9

8.3 

19.4 

- 

8.6

The current tax liability has not been offset against the current tax asset as the respective amounts relate to different group entities where 
settlement on a net basis is not possible (Refer Note 14)

56

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

Note 27. Non-current liabilities - Interest-bearing liabilities

Bank loans 
Senior notes 1996 
Senior notes 2003  
Bilateral loan notes 
Deferred borrowing costs 

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

121.7 
34.2 
142.3 
90.1 
(1.0) 

387.3 

102.0 
75.9 
142.3 
101.0 
(1.3) 

419.9 

121.7 
34.2 
142.3 
90.1 
(1.0) 

387.3 

(a) 

Financing arrangements

Unrestricted access was available at balance date to the following lines of credit:

Credit standby arrangements

Total facilities

Senior Notes - 1996 (i) 
Senior Notes - 2003 (ii) 
Syndicated Loan Note Facility (iii) 
Trade Finance Facility (iv) 
Bilateral Loan Note Facility (v) 
Receivables Acquisition Facility (vi) 
Short Term Loan (vii) 
CRL Syndicated Revolving Loan Credit Facility (viii) 
CRL Secured Working Capital Facility (ix) 
CRL Secured Bank Overdraft Facility (x) 

Used at balance date

Senior Notes - 1996 (i) 
Senior Notes - 2003 (ii) 
Syndicated Loan Note Facility (iii) 
Trade Finance Facility (iv) 
Bilateral Loan Note Facility (v) 
Receivables Acquisition Facility (vi) 
Short Term Loan (vii) 
CRL Secured Working Capital Facility (ix) 

Unused at balance date

Syndicated Loan Note Facility (iii) 
Trade Finance Facility (iv) 
Bilateral Loan Note Facility (v) 
Receivables Acquisition Facility (vi) 
CRL Syndicated Revolving Loan Credit Facility (viii) 
CRL Secured Working Capital Facility (ix) 
CRL Secured Bank Overdraft Facility (x) 

68.4 
142.3 
148.3 
85.0 
91.3 
68.3 
51.3 
15.0 
10.0 
0.5 

680.4 

68.4 
142.3 
121.7 
77.1 
90.1 
68.1 
51.3 
- 

619.0 

26.6 
7.9 
1.2 
0.2 
15.0 
10.0 
0.5 

61.4 

75.9 
142.3 
164.4 
85.0 
101.2 
75.9 
56.9 
15.0 
10.0 
0.5 

727.1 

75.9 
142.3 
102.0 
63.0 
101.0 
68.6 
56.9 
5.5 

615.2 

62.4 
22.0 
0.2 
7.3 
15.0 
4.5 
0.5 

111.9 

68.4 
142.3 
148.3 
85.0 
91.3 
68.3 
51.3 
- 
- 
- 

654.9 

68.4 
142.3 
121.7 
77.1 
90.1 
68.1 
51.3 
- 

619.0 

26.6 
7.9 
1.2 
0.2 
- 
- 
- 

35.9 

2006
$M

102.0
75.9
142.3
101.0
(1.3)

419.9

75.9
142.3
164.4
85.0
101.2
75.9
56.9
-
-
-

701.6

75.9
142.3
102.0
63.0
101.0
68.6
56.9
-

609.7

62.4
22.0
0.2
7.3
-
-
-

91.9

Iluka Resources Limited 

57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 27. Non-current liabilities - Interest-bearing liabilities (continued)

(i)  Senior Notes 1996 Series

The remaining tranches mature in: December 2008 US$30.0 million and December 2011 US$30.0 million.  As at 31 December 2007, 
US$60.0 million at an average interest rate of 7.6 per cent was outstanding on the Senior Notes (2006: US$60.0 million at 7.6 
per cent).

(ii)  Senior Notes 2003 Series

The Senior Notes - 2003 Series mature in three tranches being June 2010 US$40.0 million, June 2013 US$40.0 million and June 
2015 US$20.0 million.   As at 31 December 2007, US$100.0 million at an interest rate of 5.1 per cent was outstanding on the Senior 
Notes (2006: US$100.0 million at 5.1 per cent).

The translation exposure on these notes has been eliminated through a series of cross currency swap transactions.  On maturity of 
the notes the principal repayments are fi xed at an exchange rate of AUD/USD 0.7025. 

The swaps also convert the fi xed USD interest payments on the notes to an AUD variable interest rate exposure. As at 31 
December 2007, the cross currency swaps bear an average interest rate of 7.9 per cent (2006: 6.9 per cent). 

(iii)  Syndicated Loan Note Facility*

The Syndicated Loan Note Facility has a limit of US$130.0 million and maturity date of December 2009.  As at 31 December 2007, 
US$12.0 million and A$108.0 million at average interest rates of 5.3 per cent and 7.7 per cent respectively was outstanding under 
this agreement (2006: A$102.0 million at 7.0 per cent).

(iv)  Trade Finance Facility*

The Trade Finance Facility has a facility limit of A$85.0 million and during the year its maturity date was extended to February 2008. 
As at 31 December 2007, US$22.0 million and A$52.0 million was outstanding under this facility at interest rates of 5.1 per cent 
and 7.6 per cent respectively (2006: US$17.0 million and A$41.5 million at 5.6 per cent and 6.6 per cent respectively). Subsequent 
to year end the maturity was extended to 30 April 2008 and the facility limit reduced to A$80.0 million.

(v)  Bilateral Loan Note Facilities*

Bilateral Loan Note Facilities with two separate fi nanciers for US$40.0 million each mature in March 2010.  As at 31 December 
2007, A$90.1 million at an average interest rate of 7.5 per cent was outstanding under these agreements (2006: A$101.0 million at 
6.8 per cent).

(vi)  Receivables Acquisition Facility**

The Receivables Acquisition Agreement has a facility limit of US$60.0 million and has a maturity date of March 2008. As at 31 
December 2007, US$59.7 million was outstanding under this agreement at an interest rate of 5.25 per cent (2006: US$54.3 million 
at 5.6 per cent). Subsequent to year end the maturity was extended to 30 April 2008.

(vii) Short Term Loan*

The Short Term Loan Agreement has a facility limit of US$45.0 million and during the year its maturity date was extended February 
2008. As at 31 December 2007, A$51.3 million at an interest rate of 7.5 per cent was outstanding under this (2006: US$45.0 million 
at 5.6 per cent). Subsequent to year end the maturity was extended to 30 April 2008.

(viii) CRL Syndicated Revolving Loan Credit Facility

The Revolving Loan Credit Facility has a limit of A$15.0 million, and as at 31 December 2007 the facility was undrawn (2006: $Nil).

(ix)  CRL Secured Working Capital Facility

During the year, A$10.0 million Working Capital Facility was extended for a further 12 months to July 2008.  As at 31 December 
2007 the facility was undrawn (2006: A$5.5 million at 6.6 per cent).

(x)  CRL Secured Bank Overdraft Facility

The Bank Overdraft Facility has a limit of A$0.5 million, and at balance date this facility has not been used (2006: $Nil).

*  Subsequent to year end the company has entered into a new A$445 million Syndicated Term Loan Facility (STLF) which will replace these facilities.
**  Subsequent to year end the facility limit has been reduced to A$55 million and together with the A$445 million STLF referred to above forms a new A$500 million debt facility 

package.

58

Annual Report 2007

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 27. Non-current liabilities - 

Interest-bearing liabilities (continued) 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

Notes 

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

(b)  Assets pledged as security

The carrying amounts of assets pledged as security are against the CRL Secured Facility:

Cash and cash equivalents 
Current receivables 
Inventories 
Property, plant and equipment 

Total assets pledged as security 

(c) 

Interest rate risk exposure

10 
11 
12 
18 

4.2 
22.7 
23.7 
107.9 

158.5 

1.7 
29.1 
18.8 
110.8 

160.4 

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

-
-
-
-

-

The consolidated entity’s exposure to interest rate risk and the effective weighted average interest rate for each class of fi nancial liabilities is set out 
in the table below.  Exposures arise predominantly from liabilities bearing variable interest rates as the consolidated entity intends to hold fi xed rate 
liabilities to maturity.

Fixed interest rate

Floating  
interest rate 

$M 

- 

408.3 
142.3 

550.6 

- 

397.0 
142.3 

539.3 

1 year 
or less 

$M 

- 

34.2 
- 

34.2 

- 

- 
- 

- 

1 to 5 
years 

$M 

- 

91.1 
(56.9) 

34.2 

- 

132.8 
(56.9) 

75.9 

More than  
5 years 

Non-interest
bearing 

$M 

- 

85.4 
(85.4) 

- 

- 

85.4 
(85.4) 

- 

$M 

113.1 

- 
- 

113.1 

133.4 

- 
- 

133.4 

Total

$M

113.1

619.0
-

732.1

133.4

615.2
-

748.6

2007 

Payables (Note 23) 
Interest-bearing liabilities* 
(Notes 24 and 27) 
Interest rate swaps**  

2006

Payables (Note 23) 
Interest-bearing liabilities* 
(Notes 24 and 27) 
Interest rate swaps** 

* 

Excludes deferred borrowing costs

**   Notional principal amounts

(d)  Risk exposures 

The exposure of the consolidated entity’s and parent entity’s borrowings to interest rate 
changes and the contractual repricing dates at the balance dates are as follows:
Less than 1 year 
Between 1 and 2 years 
Between 2 and 5 years 
Over 5 years 

Australian dollar 
US dollar 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

196.5 
121.7 
147.0 
85.4 

550.6 

301.4 
253.7 

2006 
$M 

125.4 
68.6 
259.9 
85.4 

593.3 

250.0 
276.3 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

196.5 
121.7 
147.0 
85.4 

550.6 

301.4 
253.7 

119.9
68.6
259.9
85.4

533.3

244.5
276.3

For an analysis of the sensitivity of borrowings to interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk refer to Note 3.

Iluka Resources Limited 

59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 28. Non-current liabilities - Deferred tax liabilities

The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to:

Amounts recognised in profi t or loss 

Depreciation/amortisation 

Mining capital expenditure 

Foreign currency exchange 

Other 

Receivables 

Inventory 

Amounts recognised directly in equity

Cash fl ow hedges 

Set-off of deferred tax liabilities pursuant to set-off provisions (Note 19) 

Net deferred tax liabilities 

Movements:

Opening balance at 1 January 

Charged/(credited) to the income statement (Note 8) 

Charged/(credited) to equity (Notes 8 and 31) 

Under provision in prior years 

Closing balance at 31 December 

Note 29. Non-current liabilities - Provisions

Employee benefi ts 

Rehabilitation and mine closure 

Other provisions 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

118.2 

7.2 

3.6 

1.3 

3.3 

10.2 

143.8 

0.8 

144.6 

(99.9) 

44.7 

56.8 

(6.3) 

(10.1) 

4.3 

44.7 

4.7 

265.6 

- 

270.3 

106.3 

11.3 

1.9 

1.0 

5.3 

10.0 

135.8 

1.6 

137.4 

(80.6) 

56.8 

81.1 

(20.6) 

(5.5) 

1.8 

56.8 

6.6 

252.2 

1.1 

259.9 

33.2 

2.2 

3.7 

0.2 

0.1 

2.5 

41.9 

0.8 

42.7 

26.2

0.8

3.2

-

0.1

3.0

33.3

-

33.3

(33.7) 

9.0 

(27.2)

6.1

6.1 

10.4 

(7.2) 

(0.3) 

9.0 

1.0 

87.0 

- 

88.0 

35.6

(32.1)

(5.5)

8.1

6.1

2.1

72.0

0.9

75.0

60

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 29. Non-current liabilities - Provisions (continued)

Movements in each class of provision during the current fi nancial year, other than employee entitlements, are set out below:

Consolidated - 2007

Carrying amount at start of year 
Additional provisions recognised 
Payments 
Rehabilitation and restoration accretion expense 
Foreign exchange rate movements 
Unused amounts reversed 

Carrying amount at end of year 

Parent Entity - 2007

Carrying amount at start of year 
Additional provisions recognised 
Payments 
Rehabilitation and restoration accretion expense 
Unused amounts reversed 

Carrying amount at end of year 

Rehabilitation and 
mine closure 

Other
provisions

$m 

$m

297.9 
24.0 
(30.4) 
16.6 
(3.7) 
- 

304.4 

85.5 
13.9 
(9.3) 
5.6 
- 

95.7 

2.5
1.6
(0.6)
-
-
(0.9)

2.6

1.8
1.6
-
-
(0.9)

2.5

Movement in rehabilitation and mine closure provisions and other provisions represents an aggregate of current and non-current balances.

Note 30. Contributed equity

(a) 

Share Capital
Ordinary shares

Issued and paid up capital 

(b)  Movements in Ordinary Share Capital

Date 

Details 

1 January 2006 

Opening balance 

31 December 2006 

Balance 

1 January 2007 

Opening balance 

7 May 2007  

7 May 2007  

7 May 2007 
19 October 2007 

19 October 2007 

  Dividend Reinvestment Plan issue to shareholders 

  Dividend Reinvestment Plan issue to underwriter 

  Transaction costs arising on share issue 
  Dividend Reinvestment Plan issue to shareholders 

  Dividend Reinvestment Plan issue to underwriter 

31 December 2007 

Balance 

Parent entity 

Parent entity

2007 
Number of 
shares 

2006 
Number of 
shares 

2007 

2006

Paid up value  Paid up value

$M 

$M

242,237,328 

232,914,349 

662.6 

611.0

Number of shares 

Issue price 

232,914,349 

232,914,349 

232,914,349 

1,222,687 

3,637,993 

- 
1,017,118 

3,445,181 

242,237,328 

$5.68 

$5.77 

$5.27 

$5.35 

$M

611.0

611.0 

611.0

6.9

21.0

(0.1)
5.4

18.4

662.6

Iluka Resources Limited 

61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 30. Contributed equity (continued)

(c)  Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company in proportion to the 
number of and amounts paid on the shares held. On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or 
by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.

(d)  Dividend reinvestment plan 

The Company has established a fully underwritten dividend reinvestment plan under which eligible holders of ordinary shares can 
elect to have all or part of their dividend entitlements satisfi ed by the issue of new ordinary shares rather than by being paid in cash. 
Shares are issued under the plan at a discount to the market price of 2.5 per cent and 1.0 per cent to shareholders and the underwriter 
respectively.

In respect of the fi nal dividend distributed on 7 May 2007, 1,222,687 shares were issued to shareholders at a price of $5.68 per share. A 
further 3,637,993 shares were issued to the underwriter at a price of $5.77 per share. Issue costs relating to the issue of shares under 
the dividend reinvestment plan totalled $0.1 million.  In respect of the interim dividend on 19 October 2007, 1,017,118 shares were 
issued to shareholders at a price of $5.27 per share.  A further 3,445,181 shares were issued to the underwriter at a price of $5.35 per 
share.

(e) 

Capital risk management

The consolidated entity’s and the parent entity’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard their ability to continue as a going 
concern, so that they can continue to provide returns for shareholders and benefi ts for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal 
capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.

In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the consolidated entity may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, 
return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt.

The consolidated entity monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio and the level of net debt.  This ratio is calculated as net debt 
divided by total capital.  Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (including ‘interest-bearing liabilities’ as shown in the balance sheet) 
less cash and cash equivalents.  Total capital is calculated as ‘equity’ as shown in the balance sheet (including minority interest) plus net 
debt.  The consolidated entity manages net debt on a group basis with all debt being drawn by the parent entity.  All debt (excluding the 
specifi c CRL facilities described in Note 27) is under the terms of the various bank facilities.  Net debt and gearing for the parent entity 
are therefore not considered appropriate measures and therefore not reported. 

The gearing ratios at 31 December 2007 and 31 December 2006 were as follows:

Total borrowings* 

Less: cash and cash equivalents (Note 10) 

Net debt 

Total equity 

Gearing ratio 

* 

Excludes deferred borrowing costs

62

Annual Report 2007

Consolidated

2007 
$M 

619.0 

(19.9) 

599.1 

2006
$M

615.2

(17.4)

597.8

751.6 

716.5

44.3% 

45.4%

 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 31. Reserves and retained profits 

(a)  Reserves

Asset revaluation reserve 
Hedging reserve - cash fl ow hedges 
Employee share options reserve 
Foreign currency translation reserve 
Share-based payments reserve 
Defi ned benefi t superannuation reserve 

Movements:

Asset revaluation reserve

Balance 1 January 
Transfer to asset realisation reserve 
Transfer to retained earnings 

Balance 31 December 

Asset realisation reserve 
Balance 1 January 
Transfer from asset revaluation reserve 
Transfer to retained earnings 

Balance 31 December 

Hedging reserve - cash fl ow hedges

Balance 1 January 
Revaluation, net of tax 
Hedge assets recognised  
Transfer to net profi t, net of tax 
Attributable to minority interest 

Balance 31 December 

Employee options reserve
Balance 1 January  

Balance 31 December 

Foreign currency translation reserve

Balance 1 January  
Currency translation differences arising during the year  

Balance 31 December 

Share-based payments reserve
Balance 1 January  
Recognition of the fair value of equity instruments granted to employees  

Balance 31 December 

Defi ned benefi t superannuation reserve

Balance 1 January  
Decrease for the year 

Balance 31 December 

Consolidated  

Parent Entity

2007 
$M 

17.6 
4.1 
0.2 
1.7 
0.5 
(0.3) 

23.8 

18.9 
- 
(1.3) 

17.6 

- 
- 
- 

- 

20.5 
3.0 
1.9 
(21.0) 
(0.3) 

4.1 

0.2 

0.2 

(1.5) 
3.2 

1.7 

1.7 
(1.2) 

0.5 

(0.1) 
(0.2) 

(0.3) 

2006 
$M 

18.9 
20.5 
0.2 
(1.5) 
1.7 
(0.1) 

39.7 

20.3 
(1.4) 
- 

18.9 

4.7 
1.4 
(6.1) 

- 

31.4 
7.3 
- 
(17.8) 
(0.4) 

20.5 

0.2 

0.2 

(0.9) 
(0.6) 

(1.5) 

1.5 
0.2 

1.7 

- 
(0.1) 

(0.1) 

2007 
$M 

18.6 
1.9 
0.2 
- 
0.3 
- 

21.0 

19.3 
- 
(0.7) 

18.6 

- 
- 
- 

- 

18.6 
- 
1.9 
(18.6) 
- 

1.9 

0.2 

0.2 

- 
- 

- 

1.7 
(1.4) 

0.3 

- 
- 

- 

2006
$M

19.3
18.6
0.2
-
1.7
-

39.8

20.7
(1.4)
-

19.3

1.2
1.4
(2.6)

-

30.0
4.6
-
(16.0)
-

18.6

0.2

0.2

-
-

-

1.5
0.2

1.7

-
-

-

Iluka Resources Limited 

63

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 31. Reserves and retained profits (continued)

(b)  Retained profi ts

Movements in retained profi ts were as follows:

Balance 1 January 

Net profi t for the year 

Dividends 

Transfer from asset revaluation/asset realisation reserve 

Balance 31 December 

(c)  Nature and purpose of reserves

(i)  Asset revaluation reserve

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

(3.5) 

51.1 

(51.7) 

1.3 

(2.8) 

20.6 

21.0 

(51.2) 

6.1 

(3.5) 

119.6 

3.9 

(51.7) 

0.7 

72.5 

160.6

7.6

(51.2)

2.6

119.6

The asset revaluation reserve is used to record increments and decrements on the revaluation of non-current assets, as described 
in Note 1(o). Transfers are made to retained earnings on disposal of previously revalued assets.  The balance standing to the credit 
of the reserve may be used to satisfy the distribution of bonus shares to shareholders and is only available for the payment of cash 
dividends in limited circumstances as permitted by law.

(ii)  Asset realisation reserve

This reserve records the amount of asset revaluation reserve relating to disposed assets which is now available for distribution to 
shareholders.  The balance of this reserve was transferred to retained earnings at 31 December 2006 as the reserve is considered 
available for distribution to shareholders.

(iii)  Hedging reserve - cash fl ow hedges

The hedging reserve is used to record gains or losses (net of tax) on a hedging instrument in a cash fl ow hedge that are recognised 
directly in equity, as described in Note 1(m).  Amounts are recognised in profi t and loss when the associated hedged transaction 
affects profi t and loss.

(iv)  Employee share options reserve

The employee share options reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options issued but not exercised.

(v)  Foreign currency translation reserve

Exchange differences arising on translation of the net investment in foreign operations, including US dollar denominated debt used 
as a hedge of the net investment, are taken to the foreign currency translation reserve net of applicable income tax, as described 
in Note 1(d).  The reserve is recognised in profi t and loss when the net investment is disposed of.

(vi)  Employee share-based payments reserve

The employee share-based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of equity instruments granted but not yet issued to 
employees under the group’s various equity based incentive schemes. Refer Note 45.

(vii) Defi ned benefi t superannuation reserve

The defi ned benefi t superannuation reserve represents the actuarial gains and losses of the net position of the defi ned benefi t 
superannuation plans not yet recognised through the Income Statement. Refer Note 45.

64

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 32. Dividends

(a)  Ordinary shares

Final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2006 of 12 cents fully franked 
(2005: 12 cents partly franked to 9.6 cents at 30 per cent) per fully paid share 

Paid in cash 
Satisfi ed by issue of shares 

Interim dividend for the year ended 31 December 2007 of 10 cents fully franked 
(2006: 10 cents fully franked) per fully paid share

Paid in cash 
Satisfi ed by issue of shares 

(b)  Dividends not recognised at year-end 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

21.0 
6.9 

18.4 
5.4 

51.7 

27.9
-

23.3
-

51.2

The Directors have not declared a fi nal dividend (2006: 12 cents fully franked per fully paid ordinary share).  
The aggregate amount of the dividend not recognised as a liability at year-end, is 

- 

27.9

(c) 

Franked dividends

Franking credits available for subsequent fi nancial years based on a 
tax rate of 30 per cent (2006: 30 per cent) 

9.2 

20.0 

(3.6) 

8.6

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

The above amounts represent the balance of the franking account as at the end of the fi nancial year, adjusted for franking credits that 
will arise from the payment of the amount of the provision for income tax or receipt of income tax receivable.

The franking credits available to the consolidated entity include $8.5 million (2006: $11.0 million) for the Consolidated Rutile Limited 
group and $4.2 million (2006: $0.4 million) attributable to Ashton Coal Interests Pty Limited.  Distribution of franking credits by the 
parent entity is subject to receipt of fully franked dividends from Consolidated Rutile Limited which was 51.04 per cent owned by the 
parent entity at 31 December 2007 (2006: 51.04 per cent) and Ashton Coal Interests Pty Limited of which the parent entity owns 93.3 
per cent (2006: 93.3 per cent). There will be no impact on the franking account as no dividend was recommended since year-end  (2006: 
$12.0 million reduction in the franking account).

Iluka Resources Limited 

65

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 33. Key management personnel

Key Management Personnel

Key Management Personnel of the consolidated entity comprise Directors of Iluka Resources Limited as well as other specifi c employees of the 
consolidated entity who met the following criteria: ‘personnel who have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the 
activities of the consolidated entity, either directly or indirectly.’ 

The Key Management Personnel for the parent entity are the same as for the consolidated entity. Therefore, disclosure and balances in this 
Note relate to both the parent entity and the consolidated entity. 

Key Management Personnel – Directors

The following persons were Directors of Iluka Resources Limited during the fi nancial year:

(i)  Non-executive Directors

G Campbell
V Davies
R Every (Deputy Chairman)
I Mackenzie (Chairman)
D Morley
G Pizzey
G Rezos

(ii)  Managing Director and Chief Executive Offi cer

D Robb

All other above persons were Directors of Iluka Resources Limited for all of the fi nancial year, as well as for the fi nancial year ended 31 
December 2006, except D A Robb who was appointed as Managing Director on 18 October 2006 and G A Rezos who was appointed as a 
Director on 20 June 2006.  R A Tastula and W H J Barr were Directors until their retirement on 11 May 2006. 

Key Management Personnel - Employees other than Directors (‘The Executives’)

In addition to the Directors of the consolidated entity, the following employees met the defi nition of Key Management Personnel for the year 
ended 31 December 2007: 

M Adams 

P Beilby 

P J Benjamin 
D Calhoun1 
D Grant2 
V Hugo 
D McMahon3 
H Umlauff 

C Wilson 

General Manager Western Region

General Manager Murray Basin

General Manager Exploration & Geology

Executive General Manager People and Communities

Chief Financial Offi cer

General Manager Sales and Marketing 

Chief Financial Offi cer

General Manager SA Development & Project Management 

General Manager Corporate Services & Company Secretary

1 
2 
3 

D Calhoun ceased employment 30 November 2007.
D Grant ceased employment 16 February 2007.
D McMahon appointed as an Executive 29 January 2007 and ceased employment 17 January 2008.

66

Annual Report 2007

Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 33. Key management personnel (continued)

For the remainder of this Note, Key Management Personnel other than Directors of the consolidated entity are referred to as ‘Executives’.

The above persons were also Executives during the year ended 31 December 2006, except:
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  

M Adams, appointed as an Executive 1 January 2007.
P Beilby, appointed as an Executive 1 January 2007.
P Benjamin, appointed as an Executive 24 May 2006.
V Hugo, appointed as an Executive 21 February 2006.
H Umlauff, appointed as Executive 9 May 2006. 

The following persons were also Executives during the year ended 31 December 2006:
-  
-  
-  

S Ward, ceased employment as Executive General Manager Sales & Marketing on 10 February 2006.
M Bourke, ceased employment as Executive General Manager Technical Services on 3 March 2006.
W Bisset, ceased employment as Executive General Manager Global Operations on 31 December 2006.

Key Management Personnel Compensation (Consolidated and Parent Entity) 

Short Term Benefi ts 
$ 

Post Employment Benefi ts 
$ 

Share Based Payments 
$ 

Termination Benefi ts 
$ 

TOTAL
$

2007

Non-Executive Directors 

Executive Directors 

Executives 

TOTAL 

2006

Non-Executive Directors 

Executive Directors 

Executives 

TOTAL 

880,736 

1,255,076 

3,397,209 

5,533,021 

712,959 

1,810,996 

2,903,918 

5,427,873 

75,116 

90,826 

298,927 

464,869 

170,448 

32,783 

202,921 

406,152 

- 

354,485 

455,655 

810,140 

- 

(222,175) 

4,633 

(217,542) 

- 

- 

497,923 

497,923 

- 

1,009,398 

1,403,083 

2,412,481 

955,852

1,700,387

4,649,714

7,305,953

883,407

2,631,002

4,514,555

8,028,964

The company has taken advantage of the relief provided by the Corporations Regulation 2M.6.04 and has transferred the detailed remuneration 
and shareholding disclosures to the directors’ report.  The relevant information can be found in the remuneration report on pages 8 to 18.

Loans to Key Management Personnel 

No loans existed at the commencement of the year and no loans were made during the year ended 31 December 2007. 

Other Transactions with Key Management Personnel

There were no transactions which occurred between the consolidated entity and Key Management Personnel that were outside of the nature 
described below:

(a) 

(b) 

Occurrence was within a normal employee, customer or supplier relationship on terms and conditions no more favourable than those 
it is reasonable to expect the consolidated entity would have adopted if dealing at arms length with an unrelated individual;

Information about these transactions does not have the potential to adversely affect decisions about the allocation of scarce 
resources made by users of the fi nancial report, or the discharge of accountability by the Key Management Personnel; and

(c) 

The transactions are trivial or domestic in nature.

Therefore, specifi c details of other transactions with Key Management Personnel are not disclosed.

Iluka Resources Limited 

67

 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 34. Remuneration of auditors

During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided 
by the auditor of the parent entity, its related practices and non related audit fi rms:

(a)  Assurance services

Audit and audit related services

Fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers:

PwC Australia 

Other PwC fi rms 

Total remuneration for audit services  

Other assurance services 

PwC Australia 

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$ 

2006 
$ 

2007 
$ 

2006
$

807,610 

60,400 

868,010 

755,020 

63,000 

818,020 

635,000 

607,000

- 

-

635,000 

607,000

24,884 

- 

24,884 

-

Total remuneration for assurance services 

892,894 

818,020 

659,884 

607,000

(b) 

Taxation services

Fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers: 

PwC Australia 

Other PwC fi rms 

Total remuneration for taxation services 

Note 35. Retirement benefit obligations

(a) 

Superannuation plans

21,000 

33,360 

54,360 

71,220 

9,333 

80,553 

21,000 

71,220

- 

-

21,000 

71,220

Australia
All employees of the consolidated entity who do not elect an alternate fund under the Superannuation Fund Choice Legislation are 
entitled to benefi ts from the Iluka Section of the ING Master Trust (“Master Trust”) on retirement, disability or death.  The consolidated 
entity only provides superannuation through the Master Trust.  The vast majority of members are entitled to accumulation benefi ts only 
in the Master Trust.  The Master Trust also provides defi ned lump sum and pension benefi ts based on years of service and fi nal average 
salary for a small number of members.  The defi ned contribution section receives fi xed contributions from consolidated entity companies 
and the consolidated entity’s legal or constructive obligation is limited to these contributions. No balances are attributable to the parent 
entity.

USA
All employees of the US operations are entitled to benefi ts from the US operations’ pension plans on retirement, disability or death.  
The US operations have two defi ned benefi t plans and one defi ned contribution plan.  One of the defi ned benefi ts plans provides a 
monthly benefi t based on a set amount per month per year of service.  The other defi ned benefi t plan provides a monthly benefi t based 
on average salary and years of service.  The defi ned contribution plan receives an employee’s elected contribution and an employer’s 
match-up to a fi xed percentage and the entity’s legal or constructive obligation is limited to these contributions.

68

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 35. Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

The following sets out details in respect of the defi ned benefi t sections only of the Australian and US plans.

(b)  Balance sheet amounts

The amounts recognised in the balance sheet are determined as follows:

Defi ned benefi t plan obligation 

Defi ned benefi t fund plan assets 

Defi ciency of net market value of assets over the present value 
of employees’ accrued benefi t payments 

Past service costs  

Net liability in the balance sheet* 

Consolidated

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

20.4 

(17.9) 

2.5 

(1.4) 

1.1 

21.5

(17.4)

4.1

(2.7)

1.4

*  A surplus of $1.2 million (2006: $1.2 million) in respect of the Master Trust plan is included in the 2007 net defi ciency of $1.1 million (2006: $1.4 million).  That is, the amount 
recognised as a liability in the balance sheet totals $2.3 million (2006: $2.6 million) whilst the surplus amount of $1.2 million (2006: $1.2 million) has been recognised as an 
asset in the balance sheet (refer Note 17).  The surplus has been included in this note for reconciliation purposes only.

The consolidated entity may use any surplus in the defi ned benefi ts section of the Australian plans for the purposes of payment of 
superannuation expenses, a contribution holiday or a reduction in employer contributions.  No surplus funds were used during 2006 or 
2007.

(c) 

Categories of Plan Assets

The major categories of plan assets are as follows:

Cash 

Equity instruments 

Debt instruments 

Property 

Other assets 

Consolidated

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

1.1 

12.3 

2.7 

0.8 

1.0 

17.9 

0.6

11.8

2.8

1.1

1.1

17.4

The assets are invested with professional investment managers.  The number of shares (if any) of Iluka Resources Limited held by the 
managers is decided solely by the investment managers.

Iluka Resources Limited 

69

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 35. Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

(d)  Reconciliations

Reconciliation of the present value of the defi ned benefi t 
obligation, which is partly funded:

Balance at 1 January 

Current service cost 

Interest cost 

Contributions by plan participants 

Actuarial gains and losses 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes 

Benefi ts paid 

Curtailments 

Balance at 31 December 

Reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets:

Balance at 1 January 

Expected return on plan assets 

Actuarial gains and losses 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes 

Contributions by group companies 

Contributions by plan participants 

Benefi ts paid 

Balance at 31 December 

(e)  Amounts Recognised in Income Statement

Current service cost 

Interest cost 

Expected return on plan assets 

Net actuarial losses recognised in year 

Past service cost 

Gains on curtailments and settlements 

Total included in employee benefi ts expense 

Actual return on plan assets 

70

Annual Report 2007

Consolidated

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

21.5 

0.8 

1.2 

0.1 

0.5 

(1.3) 

(2.4) 

- 

20.4 

17.4 

1.3 

(0.3) 

(0.9) 

2.6 

0.1 

(2.3) 

17.9 

0.8 

1.2 

(1.3) 

0.2 

1.0 

(0.1) 

1.8 

1.0 

21.2

1.0

1.2

0.1

(0.1)

(1.1)

(0.4)

(0.4)

21.5

15.4

1.1

1.0

(0.6)

0.8

0.1

(0.4)

17.4

1.0

1.2

(1.1)

0.1

1.1

(0.2)

2.1

2.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 35. Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

(f) 

Principal actuarial assumptions

The principal actuarial assumptions used (expressed as weighted averages) were as follows:

Australia*

Discount rate 

Expected return on plan assets 

Future salary increases 

Expected rate of infl ation 

USA**

Discount rate 

Expected return on plan assets 

Future salary increases 

Expected rate of infl ation 

Consolidated

2007 
% 

2006
%

6.0 

6.5 

5.0 

2.0 

6.3 

7.5 

3.5 

3.0 

6.0

6.5

5.0

2.0

5.8

7.5

3.5

3.0

*   The expected rate of return on assets has been based on historical and future expectations of returns for each of the major categories of asset classes as well as the expected and 

actual allocation of plan assets to these major categories.  This resulted in the selection of a 7.2 per cent (2006: 7.2 per cent) rate of return gross of tax (and net of expenses) and a 6.5 
per cent (2006: 6.5 per cent) rate of return net of tax (and expenses).

**  The expected rate of return on assets has been based on historical and future expectations of returns for each of the major categories of asset classes as well as the expected and 

actual allocation of plan assets to these major categories.  This resulted in the selection of a 7.5 per cent (2006: 7.5 per cent) rate of return net of tax (and expenses).

(g) 

Employer contributions

Australia
Employer contributions to the defi ned benefi ts section of the plan are based on recommendations by the section’s actuary.  

The objective of funding is to ensure that the benefi t entitlements of members and other benefi ciaries are fully funded by the time 
they become payable.  To achieve this objective, the actuary has adopted a method of funding benefi ts known as the aggregate funding 
method.  This funding method seeks to have benefi ts funded by means of a total contribution which is expected to be a constant 
percentage of members’ salaries over their working lifetimes.

Using the funding method described above and particular actuarial assumptions as to the defi ned benefi ts plan’s future experience 
(as detailed below), the actuary recommended in the actuarial review, the payment of employer contributions to the defi ned benefi t 
plan ranging between 8.7 per cent and 24.6 per cent (2006: 0.0 per cent to 12.4 per cent) of salaries dependent on the defi ned benefi t 
category of membership.  

Total defi ned benefi t section employer contributions expected to be paid by consolidated entity companies for the year ending 31 
December 2008 are $0.3 million.

The economic assumptions used by the actuary to make the funding recommendations were a long term investment earning rate of 6.5 
per cent pa (net of fees and taxes), a salary increase rate of 5.0 per cent pa, an infl ation rate of 2.0 per cent pa and a discount rate of 
4.0 per cent pa for the pension liabilities. 

Iluka Resources Limited 

71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 35. Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

USA
Employer contributions to the defi ned benefi ts section of the plan are based on recommendations by the plan’s actuary.    

The objective of funding is to ensure that the benefi t entitlements of members and other benefi ciaries are fully funded by the time they 
become payable.  To achieve this objective, the actuary has adopted a method of funding benefi ts known as the Projected Unit Credit 
(PUC) method effective as at 1 January 2003.  Under the PUC method, unfunded past service is amortised over 10 years and future 
benefi t accruals are funded during participants’ working lifetime with cost varying based on the age of participants.  Actuarial gains/
losses are amortised over 5 years.

Using the funding method described above and particular actuarial assumptions as to the defi ned benefi ts section’s future experience 
(as detailed below), the actuary recommended in the actuarial review, the payment of $1.5 million (2006: $0.9 million) for the salaried 
defi ned benefi t plan and $0.4 million (2006: $0.2 million) for the hourly defi ned benefi t plan.  

Total employer contributions expected to be paid by consolidated entity companies for the year ending 31 December 2008 are $1.9 
million.

The economic assumptions used by the actuary to make the funding recommendations were a long term investment earning rate of 7.5 
per cent pa (2006: 7.5 per cent) (net of fees and taxes), a salary increase rate of 3.5 per cent (2006: 3.5 per cent) together with an age 
related promotional scale, an infl ation rate of 3.0 per cent (2006: 3.0 per cent) and a discount rate of 6.3 per cent (2006: 5.8 per cent) 
for the pension liabilities. 

(h)  Net fi nancial position of plan 

In accordance with AAS 25 Financial Reporting by Superannuation Plans the plan’s net fi nancial position is determined as the difference 
between the present value of the accrued benefi ts and the net market value of plan assets.

Australia
This has been determined from information supplied by the Master Trust, and a surplus of $1.2 million as at 31 December 2007 (2006: 
$1.2 million) was reported.

USA
The net fi nancial position of the USA plans has been determined as at the date of the most recent fi nancial report of the superannuation 
fund (31 December 2007), and in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Entitlements.  The defi ciency of $1.6 million as reported in the plans’ 
fi nancial report differs from the net liability of $2.3 million (2006: $2.6 million) recognised in the balance sheet as at 31 December 2007 
due to different measurement rules in the relevant accounting standards AAS 25 and IAS 19.

(i) 

Historic summary

Defi ned benefi t plan obligation 

Defi ned benefi t fund plan assets 

Defi ciency of net market value of assets over the present value 
of employees’ accrued benefi t payments 

Experience adjustments arising on plan liabilities 

Experience adjustments arising on plan assets 

72

Annual Report 2007

Consolidated

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2005 
$M 

2004
$M

20.4 

(17.9) 

21.5 

(17.4) 

2.5 

- 

- 

4.1 

- 

- 

21.2 

(15.4) 

5.8 

(0.3) 

0.3 

18.4

(14.1)

4.3

-

0.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

Note 36. Contingent liabilities

Contingent liabilities 

Details and estimates of maximum amounts of contingent liabilities are as follows:  

Performance, Commitments and guarantees (a) 

88.3 

75.2 

31.6 

31.3

(a)   The consolidated entity has negotiated a number of bank guarantees in favour of various government authorities and service providers to 

meet its obligations under exploration and mining tenements.

(b)    There is some risk that native title, as established by the High Court of Australia’s decision in the Mabo case, exists over some of the land 

over which the consolidated entity holds tenements or over land required for access purposes.  It is impossible at this stage to quantify 
the impact (if any) which these developments may have on the operations of the consolidated entity.

(c)    In the course of its normal business, the consolidated entity occasionally receives claims arising from its operating activities.  In the 

opinion of the Directors, all such matters are covered by insurance, or, if not covered, are without merit or are of such a kind or involve 
such amounts that would not have a material adverse effect on the operating results or fi nancial position of the consolidated entity if 
settled unfavourably.

(d)    In 2004, Iluka entered into a largely lump sum Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contract with Downer Mining (formerly 
Roche Mining) for the construction of a wet concentrator plant and a mining unit plant at Douglas and a mineral separation plant at 
Hamilton in Victoria, both in the Murray Basin.  The original contract price was $197.0 million.  Downer Mining was over 12 months late 
in completing construction activities.  Iluka has paid Downer Mining approximately A$205 million in payments under the EPC contract 
to date.  During the course of construction, Downer Mining lodged contractual claims in excess of $160.0 million in respect to the wet 
concentrator plant and mining unit plant at Douglas and the mineral separation plant at Hamilton.  In accordance with the procedures 
under the contract, Downer Mining’s claims were properly assessed and all but a small proportion were duly rejected as being without 
contractual and legal basis.  In October 2007, Downer Mining commenced proceedings in the Victorian Supreme Court claiming $68.4 
million from Iluka in respect to various alleged breaches by Iluka of the EPC contract.  This latest claim supersedes Downer Mining’s 
earlier ambit contractual claims of $160 million (referred to above).  Iluka also has signifi cant counterclaims against Downer Mining 
which will be detailed in its defence and counterclaim.  Based on detailed assessment and external specialist legal advice, the claims 
continue to be rejected and, accordingly, no liability has been recognised.

(e)    In December 2006, Iluka entered into an in-principle letter agreement with Bemax Resources Limited (Bemax) regarding the sale to 

Bemax of a series of tenements known as the Tutunup deposit. In the letter agreement, the two parties set out a process for agreeing on 
a net present value of the assets upon which the sale price would be based. The parties could not come to an agreement on the valuation, 
and negotiations for the sale ceased.  In December 2007 Bemax commenced proceedings against Iluka in the Supreme Court of Western 
Australia.  Bemax claims that the letter agreement created a binding obligation to sell the Tutunup tenements to Bemax for $12 million.  
Bemax is seeking specifi c performance of the letter agreement, or, if the court is not able to order Iluka to transfer the tenements to 
Bemax, damages for lost opportunities.  Based on detailed assessment and external specialist legal advice, the claims continue to be 
rejected and, accordingly, no liability has been recognised.

Iluka Resources Limited 

73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 37. Commitments

(a) 

Capital commitments

Capital expenditure for the acquisition of plant and equipment 
and mine development contracted for and payable not later than 
one year* 

*  Included in capital commitments for the consolidated entity are commitments in 

relation to the Murray Basin of $4.6 million (2006: $0.7 million).

(b) 

Exploration commitments

Exploration expenditure commitments payable*:

Within one year 

Later than one year but not later than fi ve years 

Later than fi ve years 

*  These costs are discretionary.  If the expenditure commitments are not met then 

the associated exploration and mining leases may be relinquished.

(c)    Lease commitments

Commitments in relation to operating leases contracted for at 
the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities, payable: 

Within one year 

Later than one year but not later than fi ve years 

Later than fi ve years 

(d)  Other commitments

Commitments for payments in relation to non-cancellable contracts are 
payable as follows*:

Within one year 

Later than one year but not later than fi ve years 

Later than fi ve years 

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

20.4 

9.0 

12.4 

4.1

17.5 

42.0 

50.2 

109.7 

14.5 

34.5 

51.8 

100.8 

8.5 

27.8 

18.1 

54.4 

40.6 

105.8 

61.8 

208.2 

8.0 

22.0 

19.1 

49.1 

38.8 

115.0 

81.7 

235.5 

9.6 

20.6 

12.9 

43.1 

3.3 

9.5 

2.8 

15.6 

7.0

12.6

10.8

30.4

2.6

4.8

0.7

8.1

36.5 

102.8 

60.0 

199.3 

34.4

113.0

80.0

227.4

*  Included in other commitments are amounts of $199.9 million (2006: $232.2 million) in respect of the consolidated entity and $199.3 million (2006: $227.4 million) in respect 

of the parent entity which relate to long term contracts for coal, gas, electricity and water used in the production process.  

74

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 38. Related party transactions

(a)  Directors and specifi ed executives

Disclosures relating to Directors and Key Management Personnel are set out in Note 33.

(b) 

Controlled entities and controlling entities

Details of material controlled entities are set out in Note 39. The ultimate Australian controlling entity and the ultimate parent entity in 
the wholly-owned group is Iluka Resources Limited.

Management fees applicable to the provision of services to Consolidated Rutile Limited, a materially controlled entity, covers treasury, 
taxation, exploration, internal audit, marketing and other corporate and operational services.  The fee charged for these services is 
based on commercial rates.

Aggregate amounts receivable from / payable to material controlled entities 
at balance date:

Non-current receivables (loans) 

Aggregate amounts included in the determination of profi t (loss) before 
income tax that resulted from transaction with other related parties:

Management fee revenue from material controlled entity 

(c)  Wholly-owned group

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$’000 

2006 
$’000 

2007 
$’000 

2006
$’000

- 

- 

- 

- 

2,996 

1,697

987 

940

The wholly-owned group consists of Iluka Resources Limited and its wholly-owned controlled entities.  Ownership interests in these 
material wholly-owned entities are set out in Note 39.

Transactions between Iluka Resources Limited and other entities in the wholly-owned group during the years ended 31 December 2007 
and 31 December 2006 consisted of:
 (i) 
loans advanced by Iluka Resources Limited;
loans repaid to Iluka Resources Limited;
 (ii)  
 (iii)   the payment of interest on the above loans; and
 (iv)   management services provided by Iluka Resources Limited.

Aggregate amounts included in the determination of profi t (loss) before income 
tax that resulted from transactions with entities in the wholly-owned group:

Interest revenue 

Aggregate amounts receivable from / payable to entities in the wholly-owned 
group at balance date:

Non-current receivables (loans) 

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$’000 

2006 
$’000 

2007 
$’000 

2006
$’000

- 

- 

- 

- 

17,686 

77,965

286,186 

313,222

Iluka Resources Limited 

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 38. Related party transactions (continued)

Loans are made between Iluka Resources Limited and certain entities in the wholly-owned group.  Where interest is levied it is payable/
receivable on the amount outstanding at commercial rates.  There were no borrowings by the parent entity in 2007 or 2006.  The average 
lending rate for the year for loans advanced by the parent entity was 6.5 per cent  (2006: 5.9 per cent).  There are no fi xed terms for the 
repayment of principal on loans.

Iluka Resources Limited has taken out insurance policies on behalf of certain controlled entities as part of a group wide insurance risk 
management programme.  The Company has a policy of insuring against risks which might materially affect the consolidated entity’s 
cash fl ow.  Risks covered include property damage, business interruption, public and product liability, fi delity, and Directors and offi cers’ 
liability.

(d) 

Transactions with related parties

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$’000 

2006 
$’000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2007 
$’000 

39,415 

15,399 

2006
$’000

28,987

10,101

39,415 

28,987

15,399 

10,101

Current tax payable assumed from wholly-owned tax consolidated entities 

Tax losses assumed from wholly-owned tax consolidated entities 

(e)  Outstanding balances arising from sale/purchase of 

goods and services

Current receivable (tax funding arrangement)

 Wholly-owned tax consolidated entities 

Current payables (tax funding agreement)
Wholly-owned tax consolidated entities 

(f) 

Other related parties

Information relating to joint venture interests is set out in Note 41.

Note 39. Investments in significant controlled entities

The consolidated fi nancial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following subsidiaries in accordance with the accounting policy 
described in Note 1(b).

Name of Entity 

Iluka Corporation Limited 
Basin Minerals Limited 
Iluka Midwest Limited 
The Nardell Colliery Pty Limited 
Consolidated Rutile Limited  
Iluka Administration Limited 
Iluka Resources Inc. 
Iluka Exploration Pty Limited 
Ashton Coal Interests Pty Limited 
Iluka (Eucla Basin) Pty Limited 

*The proportion of ownership interest is equal to the proportion of voting power held.

76

Annual Report 2007

Equity holding*

Country of 
 incorporation 

Australia 
Australia 
Australia 
Australia 
Australia 
Australia 
USA 
Australia 
Australia 
Australia 

2007 
% 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
51.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
93.3 
100.0 

2006
%

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
51.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
93.3
100.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 40. Deed of cross guarantee

In 1998, Iluka Resources Limited, Westlime (WA) Limited, Ilmenite Pty Limited, Southwest Properties Pty Limited, Western Mineral Sands Pty 
Limited and Yoganup Pty Limited were parties to a Deed of Cross Guarantee under which each company guarantees the debts of the others.  
By entering into the Deed, the wholly-owned entities have been relieved from the requirements to prepare a Financial Report and Directors’ 
Report under Class Order 98/1418 (as amended by Class Order 98/2017) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission 
(“ASIC”).

On 26 November 1999, ASIC approved a Deed of Cross Guarantee to add the following wholly-owned entities: Iluka Corporation Limited; 
Associated Minerals Consolidated Limited; Iluka Administration Limited; Iluka (NSW) Limited; Iluka Consolidated Pty Limited; Iluka Exploration 
Pty Limited; Gold Fields Asia Limited; Iluka International Limited; NGG Holdings Limited; Caroda Pty Limited; Iluka Midwest Limited; Western 
Titanium Limited; The Mount Lyell Mining and Railway Company Limited; Colinas Pty Limited; Renison Limited; Iluka Finance Limited; The 
Nardell Colliery Pty Limited; Glendell Coal Limited and Lion Properties Pty Limited.

On 30 January 2003, ASIC approved a further Deed of Assumption to add Basin Minerals Limited, Basin Minerals Holdings Pty Limited, Basin 
Properties Pty Limited and Swansands Pty Limited to the Deed of Cross Guarantee.  Relief from the requirement to prepare a Financial Report 
and Directors’ Report under the Class Order is effective for the fi nancial year ending December 2002 and subsequent fi nancial years.

During 2004, ASIC approved a Deed of Assumption for the removal of Iluka (NSW) Limited, Caroda Pty Limited and Colinas Pty Limited from the 
Deed of Cross Guarantee.  During 2005, these companies were deregistered.

During 2005, ASIC approved a further Deed of Assumption to add Iluka (Eucla Basin) Pty Limited to the Deed of Cross Guarantee.

All the above companies represent a Closed Group for the purposes of the Class Order, and as there are no other parties to the Deed of Cross 
Guarantee that are controlled by Iluka Resources Limited, they also represent the Extended Closed Group.

Set out below are condensed consolidated income statements for the years ended 31 December 2007 and 31 December 2006 of the Extended 
Closed Group.

Condensed Income Statement

Revenue from ordinary activities 

Interest and fi nance costs 

Exchange losses on foreign currency borrowings 

Other expenses from ordinary activities 

Impairment charges 

Income tax (expense) benefi t 

Profi t for the year 

Summary of Movements In Consolidated Retained Profi ts

Retained profi ts at the beginning of the fi nancial year 

Transfer from asset revaluation/asset realisation reserve 

Profi t for the year 

Dividends provided for or paid 

Retained profi ts at the end of the fi nancial year 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

757.6 

(57.6) 

(4.0) 

(646.7) 

- 

(11.3) 

38.0 

85.5 

1.2 

38.0 

(51.7) 

73.0 

794.0

(39.2)

(1.0)

(644.1)

(64.6)

6.1

51.2

79.4

6.1

51.2

(51.2)

85.5

Iluka Resources Limited 

77

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 40. Deed of cross guarantee (continued)

Set out below are consolidated balance sheets as at 31 December 2007 
and 31 December 2006 of the Extended Closed Group.

Condensed Balance Sheet

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents 
Receivables 
Inventories 
Derivative fi nancial instruments 
Current tax receivables 

Other 

Total current assets 

Non-current assets

Receivables 
Inventories 
Other fi nancial assets 
Property, plant and equipment 
Intangible assets 

Other 

Total non-current assets 

Total assets 

Current liabilities

Payables 
Interest-bearing liabilities 
Current tax liabilities 
Provisions 

Total current liabilities 

Non-current liabilities

Interest-bearing liabilities 
Deferred tax liabilities 
Provisions 
Other 

Total non-current liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

Equity

Contributed equity 
Reserves 
Retained profi ts 

Total equity 

78

Annual Report 2007

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

7.7 
144.2 
283.0 
2.1 
12.4 

13.2 

462.6 

72.2 
- 
149.9 
1,074.9 
15.1 

0.7 

1,312.8 

1,775.4 

85.6 
230.7 
- 
31.2 

347.5 

387.4 
39.9 
242.6 
- 

669.9 

5.0
167.3
209.5
-
-

16.3

398.1

110.4
5.5
149.9
1,078.5
16.8

-

1,361.1

1,759.2

110.7
188.5
8.6
30.1

337.9

419.9
43.1
220.2
0.1

683.3

1,017.4 

1,021.2

758.0 

738.0

662.6 
22.4 
73.0 

758.0 

611.0
41.5
85.5

738.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 41. Interests in joint ventures

(a)  Narama joint venture

The consolidated entity’s interest in the Narama Joint Venture is classifi ed as a discontinued operation, refer Note 9.

(b)  Other joint ventures

The consolidated entity also has a number of interests in joint ventures to explore for titanium minerals and zircon resources.  The 
consolidated entity’s share of expenditure in respect of these exploration activities is capitalised where appropriate in accordance with 
the accounting policy stated in Note 1(b)(ii), and no revenue is generated.  The consolidated entity’s share of the assets and liabilities in 
respect of these joint ventures is not material.

Note 42. Reconciliation of profit after income tax to 

net cash inflow (outflow) from operating activities

Profi t after income tax 
Depreciation and amortisation 
Previously capitalised exploration expenditure written-off 
Current year exploration expenditure capitalised 
Interest capitalised 
Net (gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment 
Net exchange differences on borrowings 
Rehabilitation, restoration and accretion expense and other borrowing cost unwind  
Non-cash employee benefi ts  
Asset impairments and write-offs 
Amortisation of deferred borrowing costs 
Other non-cash operating activities between group entities 
Hedge gains recognised in respect of hedge book realised in August 2006 
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Decrease (increase) in receivables 
Decrease (increase) in inventories 
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax assets 
Decrease (increase) in other operating assets 
Decrease (increase) in income tax receivable 
Increase (decrease) in payables 
Increase (decrease) in other operating liabilities 
Increase (decrease) in provision for income taxes payables 
Increase (decrease) in provision for deferred tax liabilities 
Increase (decrease) in other provisions 

Net cash infl ow (outfl ow) from operating activities 

Consolidated 

Parent entity

2007 
$M 

2006 
$M 

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

60.4 
147.9 
1.1 
(5.5) 
- 
(11.3) 
(9.7) 
17.5 
1.3 
- 
0.3 
- 
(26.6) 

40.4 
(68.6) 
3.8 
6.7 
(12.6) 
(13.3) 
(2.5) 
(6.6) 
(5.4) 
(21.8) 

95.5 

31.5 
127.3 
1.3 
(7.0) 
(13.5) 
(30.1) 
2.4 
13.4 
(0.5) 
92.2 
0.4 
- 
- 

(52.3) 
(51.8) 
6.0 
29.3 
- 
(12.9) 
2.8 
4.1 
(20.1) 
19.7 

142.2 

3.9 
43.8 
- 
- 
- 
(4.9) 
(17.3) 
5.7 
0.9 
- 
0.3 
(17.7) 
(26.6) 

12.6 
9.7 
- 
(9.3) 
(13.3) 
(3.2) 
(5.2) 
(9.9) 
11.4 
(8.4) 

(27.5) 

7.6
34.9
-
-
(13.5)
0.4
(8.2)
2.8
0.1
60.0
0.4
(79.7)
-

18.6
(15.3)
-
32.2
-
1.4
5.3
5.3
(26.1)
5.2

31.4

Note 43. Non-cash investing and financing activities

Non-cash investing and fi nancing activities consisted of shares to the value of $12.3 million paid to shareholders in respect of the dividend 
reinvestment program, details of which are set out in Note 30(d).

Iluka Resources Limited 

79

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 44. Earnings per share

(a)  Basic earnings per share

Profi t from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary  
equity holders of the company  

Profi t from discontinued operation 

Profi t attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the company 

(b)  Diluted earnings per share

Profi t from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary  
equity holders of the company  

Profi t from discontinued operation 

Profi t attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the company 

Reconciliations of earnings used in calculating earnings per share

Profi t for the year 

Net profi t attributable to minority interests 

Profi t from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders 
of the company used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share 

Profi t from discontinued operation 

Profi t attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the company used in 
calculating basic and diluted earnings per share 

Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as 
the denominator in calculating basic earnings per share 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary 
shares used as the denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share 

80

Annual Report 2007

Consolidated

2007 
Cents 

2006
Cents

17.0 

4.6 

21.6 

17.0 

4.6 

21.6 

5.0

4.1

9.1

5.0

4.1

9.1

  Consolidated

2007 
$M 

2006
$M

49.5 

(9.3) 

40.2 

10.9 

51.1 

22.1

(10.5)

11.6

9.4

21.0

  Consolidated

2007 
Number 

2006
Number

236,966,229 

232,914,349

236,966,229 

232,914,349

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 45. Share-based payments

During the year ended 31 December 2007 the following incentive plans were active: 

(a)    Short Term and Long Term Incentive Plans

The 2007 plan consists of two parts being, the Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP) and Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP).  Both plans are at 
risk components of remuneration which operate within the existing rules of the Directors, Executives and Employees Share Acquisition 
Plan (Plan), as approved by the shareholders at the Company’s Annual General Meeting in May 1999.

At target levels of performance, the STIP represents two-thirds of potential variable remuneration, and the LTIP represents one-third.  
Objectives, measures and targets for both the STIP and the LTIP are set on an annual basis and are subject to the approval of the Board.

Only nominated managers and executives participate in the short and long term incentive plans.  The level of award opportunity is 
determined by an individual’s role within the business and capacity to impact the results of the Company.

The target incentive opportunity for key management personnel under the STIP is 60 per cent of total fi xed remuneration (TFR) and 
under the LTIP is 30 per cent of TFR.  At stretch levels of performance the incentive opportunity under the STIP increases to 90 per cent.

(i)  Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP)

The STIP requires profi tability and sustainability performance exceeding 90 per cent of target before any award is payable for 
these measures.  Growth objectives are set at stretch levels and are linked to the achievement of key business growth and 
improvement outcomes.

Half of the STIP award is to be paid in cash and half on a deferred basis in the form of restricted shares.  Fifty per cent of the 
restricted shares are subject to a time-based vesting period of one year after the end of the performance period. The remaining 50 
per cent is subject to a time-based vesting period of two years after the end of the performance period.

The share rights granted in 1 January 2008 under the STIP to participating employees is 494,082.

(ii)  Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

The LTIP provides a grant of equity in the form of share rights that vest after three years subject to performance over the three 
year period.  

The grant is split into two separate tranches, with one tranche (50 per cent) being assessed based on return on equity (ROE) 
relative to an internal target and the other (50 per cent) based on Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance relative to a 
comparator group of companies. 

Targets are set giving consideration to: 
• 
• 
• 

prior ROE performance history; 
planned strategic and business plan activity throughout the performance period; and 
comparable company performance. 

The maximum share rights granted in 1 January 2007 under the LTIP to participating employees is 430,984.

(b)    Performance Incentive Plans

The Performance Incentive Plan (PIP) was introduced in March 2005 and applied to the 2005 and 2006 years. 

The maximum level of participation in 2006 for members of the executive team was 80% of total fi xed remuneration.  Upon achievement 
of pre-determined objectives, 40% maximum may be awarded as cash; the remaining 40% was required to be deferred in the form of 
share rights.

For the year ended 31 December 2006, Iluka’s fi nancial performance (NPAT and ROE) represented 50% of the apportionment, health 
and safety performance (LTIFR, AIFR, Level 2 Environmental Incidents) was apportioned at 10% and key objectives from the employee’s 
operational or functional responsibilities accounted for the balance.  Any share rights granted pursuant to the 2006 PIP had a grant date 
of 1 January 2007.

Iluka Resources Limited 

81

Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 45. Share-based payments (continued)

The fair value of shares granted under the PIP was determined at grant date.  The fair value of the grant was released as an expense 
through the Income Statement on a straight-line basis between the grant date and the vesting date of entitlements.

Maximum potential share rights granted under the PIP to  
participating employees on 1 January:  

  Consolidated 

  Parent entity

2007 
Number 

2006 
Number 

2007 
Number 

2006
Number

115,509 

126,208 

115,509 

126,208

(c)  Directors’, Executives’ and Employees’ Share Acquisition Plan

Prior to the introduction of the PIP in 2005, the Company operated Long-term Incentive Plans pursuant to the terms of the Directors’, 
Executives’ and Employees’ Share Acquisition Plan (Plan).  The Plan was approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting of the 
Company in May 1999.  From year to year the Board invited the Managing Director and other employees determined by the Board to hold 
an executive position, to participate in the Plan as a means of providing those employees with an incentive to enhance the performance 
of the Company.  The terms of the annual offer included an allocated maximum number of shares (maximum allocation) that will be 
acquired or retained under the Plan on behalf of the employee if certain performance criteria, as determined by the Board, are satisfi ed.

The performance criteria for each offer are based on total shareholder return against a pre-determined comparator group of companies 
over a three year performance period.  At the end of the performance period the performance of the Company against the comparator 
group is assessed and a determination is made as to how much of the maximum allocation the employee will be entitled to have acquired 
on his or her behalf by the Trustee.  Once the maximum allocation is determined, the Trustee purchases the shares and holds them on 
trust for the employee for a maximum period of ten years.  At the end of the ten years, or earlier if approved by the Board, the shares 
are transferred from the Trustee to the employee.

Since the Plan was approved by shareholders, there have been individual offers in respect to 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.  The 
performance period for the 2003 plan concluded and was assessed on 30 June 2006.  The performance period of the 2004 plan 
concluded and was assessed on 31 December 2006.  Shares awarded in 2007 pursuant to the 2004 plan as well as shares awarded in 
2006 pursuant to the 2003 plan are shown in the table below.

The fair value of entitlements offered under the Plan has been determined via an option pricing model.  This fair value is released as an 
expense through the Income Statement on a straight-line basis between the offer date and the assessment date for each respective 
plan.

Shares were awarded under the Directors’, Executives’ and  
Employees’ Share Acquisition Plan to participating employees  
on 1 March 2007 (25 August 2006). 

  Consolidated 

  Parent entity

2007 
Number 

2006 
Number 

2007 
Number 

2006
Number

109,584 

93,602 

109,584 

93,602

(d) 

Share rights provided to the managing director

The Managing Director was granted 71,851 share rights in October 2006, to match the shares he purchased prior to commencing 
employment on the basis that Iluka would match this with an equivalent award of share rights.

These share rights vest on 30 June 2008.  The fair value of these share rights has been determined at grant date - refer Note 36.  The 
fair value of the grant is released as an expense through the Income Statement between the grant date and the vesting date of the 
entitlements.

(e)    Expenses arising from share-based payment transactions

Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised  
during the year as part of employee benefi t expense were as follows: 

  Consolidated 

 Parent entity

2007 
$M 

1.3 

2006 
$M 

0.1 

2007 
$M 

0.9 

2006
$M

0.1

82

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007

Note 46. Events occuring after the balance sheet date

(a) Disposal of interest in the Narama Coal joint venture

On the 15 January 2008 Iluka disposed of its interest in the Narama Coal joint venture with effect from 1 January 2008 – refer to Note 9.

(b) Refi nancing of existing debt facilities

On 21 February 2008, the Company indicated that it was well progressed in securing a single, enlarged corporate debt facility to replace 
and extend the maturities of certain of its existing facilities. The company has since executed a new $500 million debt facility package 
comprising a Syndicated Term Loan Facility of $445 million and a Working Capital Facility of $55 million (refer Note 27(a)).

(c) Intended Equity Raising

On 21 February 2008, the Company announced an intention to raise capital in the region of $350 million through a renounceable pro-rata 
entitlement offer. Detailed work on the fi nal structure and timing of this equity raising continues at the time of approval of this fi nancial 
report.

Iluka Resources Limited 

83

7
0
0
2
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
1
3

n
o
i
t
a
r
a
l
c
e
D

’
s
r
o
t
c
e
r
i
D

In the Directors’ opinion:

(a) 

the fi nancial statements and notes set out on pages 21 to 83 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, 
including:

(i) 

complying with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional 
reporting requirements; and

(ii)  giving a true and fair view of the Company’s and consolidated entity’s fi nancial position as at 31 December 

2007 and of their performance for the fi nancial year ended on that date; and

(b) 

(c) 

(d) 

there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become 
due and payable; and

the audited remuneration disclosures set out on pages 8 to 18 of the Directors’ Report comply with Accounting 
Standards AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

at the date of this declaration, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the members of the Extended Closed 
Group identifi ed in Note 40 will be able to meet any obligations or liabilities to which they are, or may become, 
subject by virtue of the Deed of Cross Guarantee described in Note 40.

The Directors have been given the declarations by the Chief Executive Offi cer and Chief Financial Offi cer required by 
section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.

I C R Mackenzie
Chairman

D A Robb
Managing Director

Perth
12 March 2008

84

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
d
e
t
i

i

m
L
s
e
c
r
u
o
s
e
R
a
k
u
l
I

f
o

s
r
e
b
m
e
m
e
h
t

o
t

t
r
o
p
e
R

t
i
d
u
A

t
n
e
d
n
e
p
e
d
n
I

Report on the fi nancial report and the AASB 124 Remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report

We have audited the accompanying fi nancial report of Iluka Resources Limited (the company), which comprises the 
balance sheet as at 31 December 2007, and the income statement, statement of recognised income and expense and 
cash fl ow statement for the year ended on that date, a summary of signifi cant accounting policies, other explanatory 
notes and the directors’ declaration for both Iluka Resources Limited and the Iluka Resources Limited Group (the 
consolidated entity). The consolidated entity comprises the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or 
from time to time during the fi nancial year.

We have also audited the remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report under the heading “remuneration 
report” in pages 8 to 18 of the directors’ report and not in the fi nancial report.

Directors’ responsibility for the fi nancial report and the AASB 124 Remunerations disclosures contained in the 
directors’ report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the fi nancial report in 
accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the 
Corporations Act 2001. This responsibility includes establishing and maintaining internal control relevant to the 
preparation and fair presentation of the fi nancial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud 
or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable 
in the circumstances. In Note 1, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation 
of Financial Statements, that compliance with the Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards 
ensures that the fi nancial report, comprising the fi nancial statements and notes, complies with International Financial 
Reporting Standards.

The directors of the company are also responsible for the remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report.

Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the fi nancial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in 
accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical 
requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the 
fi nancial report is free from material misstatement. Our responsibility is to also express an opinion on the remuneration 
disclosures contained in the directors’ report based on our audit.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the fi nancial 
report and the remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report. The procedures selected depend on the 
auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the fi nancial report and the 
remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk 
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the 
fi nancial report and the remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report in order to design audit procedures 
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of 
the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the 
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the 
fi nancial report and the remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report. 

Our procedures include reading the other information in the Annual Report to determine whether it contains any material 
inconsistencies with the fi nancial report.

For further explanation of an audit, visit our website http://www.pwc.com/au/fi nancialstatementaudit.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

Iluka Resources Limited 

85

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or management.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.

Auditor’s opinion on the fi nancial report
In our opinion:

(a) 

the fi nancial report of Iluka Resources Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i) 

giving a true and fair view of the company’s and consolidated entity’s fi nancial position as at 31 December 2007 and of their 
performance for the year ended on that date; and

(ii)   complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations 
   Regulations 2001, and

(b) 

the fi nancial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1.

Auditor’s opinion on the AASB 124 Remuneration disclosures contained in the directors’ report. 
In our opinion, the remuneration disclosures that are contained in pages 8 to 18 of the directors’ report comply with section 300A of the 
Corporations Act 2001.

Perth
12 March 2008

PricewaterhouseCoopers

David J Smith 
Partner 

86

Annual Report 2007

 
  
 
e
c
n
a
n
r
e
v
o
G
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C

Approach to Corporate Governance

Iluka and its Board of Directors are committed 
to achieving the highest standards of corporate 
governance and acknowledge that this is essential 
in creating and building sustainable value for 
shareholders. The main elements of Iluka’s corporate 
governance practices are detailed in this statement.  
Overarching these detailed elements is the overall 
commitment of the Board of Directors to act honestly, 
ethically, diligently and in accordance with the law 
in serving the interests of Iluka’s shareholders, 
employees, customers and the communities in which 
Iluka operates.

ASX Corporate Governance 
Recommendations

Iluka considers that it meets each of the requirements 
of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) Corporate 
Governance Principles and Recommendations as 
revised and released in August 2007. 

The governance section of the Iluka website contains 
the company’s key governance policy documents. These 
include the:

• 

• 

•  

•  

•  

•  

•  

•  

Board Charter

Directors’ Code of Conduct

Audit and Risk Committee Charter

Remuneration and Nomination Committee 
Charter

Employee Code of Conduct

Securities Trading Policy

Continuous Disclosure and Market 
Communications Policy

Business Conduct Reporting and Control Policy
(Whistleblower Policy)

During 2007 the Board reviewed and updated a number 
of these key documents. Iluka will continue to update 
the corporate governance section of its website 
as it makes further improvements to its corporate 
governance practices.

Role and Responsibilities of the Board 
of Directors

The Board operates in accordance with the broad 
principles set out in its Charter. The overall role of the 
Board involves four key areas of responsibility: 

• 

• 

•  

• 

appointing and removing the Managing Director, 
determining his or her remuneration, terms and 
conditions of employment and assessment of 
the performance of the Managing Director and 
through him or her, the executive management 
group; 

determining the strategic direction and 
fi nancial objectives of the company and 
ensuring appropriate resources are available to 
management; 

monitoring the implementation and achievement 
of strategic and fi nancial objectives; and

reporting to shareholders and the investment 
community on the performance of the company. 

The implementation of corporate strategy and day-
to-day management of Iluka’s affairs are delegated 
to management; however, the Board retains specifi c 
responsibility for: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

reviewing and approving systems of risk 
management, internal control and compliance, 
codes of conduct, continuous disclosure and 
legal compliance;

reviewing and approving major capital 
expenditure, capital management, acquisitions 
and divestitures;

reviewing and approving business plans and 
budgets, including the setting of company 
performance objectives;

monitoring the company’s operational and 
fi nancial position and performance;

approving the company’s fi nancial and 
accounting policies and fi nancial statements;

monitoring compliance with control and 
accountability systems, regulatory requirements 
and ethical standards;

approving the fi nancial and other reporting 
mechanisms for adequate, accurate and timely 
information being provided to the Board;

approving processes, procedures and systems 
to ensure that fi nancial results are appropriately 
and accurately reported on a timely basis;

Iluka Resources Limited 

87

 
• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

reviewing executive succession planning and development;

approving the acquisition, establishment, disposal or 
cessation of any signifi cant business of the company;

approving the issue of any securities in the company;

approving any public statements which refl ect signifi cant 
issues of company policy or strategy;

approving any changes to the discretions delegated from 
the Board; and

deciding on any matters which exceed the authority limits 
delegated to the Managing Director.

Board Composition

Directors are considered and nominated by the Remuneration and 
Nomination Committee based on the skills and experience they 
are able to bring to Board deliberations on current and emerging 
issues. In addition, the Board seeks to ensure that the size of the 
Board and the blend of skills within its membership is conducive to 
effective discussion and effi cient decision-making. In recent years, 
the services of external search consultants have been used to 
assist with recruiting new Directors. Details of the members of the 
Board, their date of appointment, qualifi cations and experience are 
set out in the Directors’ Report under the heading ‘Directors’.

Iluka’s Constitution requires Directors to retire from offi ce no later 
than the third Annual General Meeting following their election. The 
Directors have adopted an internal guideline that the preferred 
length of service is ten years, unless otherwise requested by the 
Board to continue. 

In December 2007, the Chairman, Mr Ian Mackenzie, announced 
his intention to retire as Chairman and as a Director, at the 
company’s next Annual General Meeting to be held in May 2008.  
Associated with this decision, Dr Robert Every was appointed 
Deputy Chairman of the Board and is expected to assume the 
position of Chairman following the conclusion of the 2008 AGM.

Director Independence

The Board recognises the importance of independent judgement 
in the decision-making process. The Board’s Charter expressly 
requires that the majority of the Board be comprised of 
independent Directors and that the Chairman be an independent 
Director. To qualify as independent, a Director must be non-
executive and:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

must not be a substantial shareholder of the company 
or an offi cer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a 
substantial shareholder of the company;

within the last three years have not been employed in 
an executive capacity by the company or another group 
member, or been a Director of the company within three 
years after ceasing to hold any such employment;

within the last three years have not been a principal of a 
material professional adviser or a material consultant to 
the company or another group member, or an employee 
materially associated with the service provided;

not be a material supplier or customer of the company 
or other group member, or an offi cer of, or otherwise 
associated directly or indirectly with, a material supplier or 
customer;

have no material contractual relationship with the company 
or another group member other than as a Director of the 
company;

have not served on the Board for a period which could, 
or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere 
with the Director’s ability to act in the best interests of the 
company; and

be free from any interest and any business or other 
relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived 
to, materially interfere with the Director’s ability to act in 
the best interests of the company.

Applying the above criteria, the Board considers that all non-
executive Directors are independent.

The Board assesses the independence of new Directors upon 
appointment and reviews the independence of other Directors as 
appropriate.

Managing Director

The Managing Director, Iluka’s most senior employee, recommends 
policy, strategic direction and business plans for the Board’s 
approval and is responsible for managing the company’s day-to-
day activities.

The Managing Director is selected and appointed by the Board and 
is subject to an annual performance review by the non-executive 
Directors.

88

Annual Report 2007

Confl icts of Interest

Each Director has an ongoing responsibility to:

• 

• 

disclose to the Board actual or potential confl icts of interest 
that may, or might reasonably be thought to, exist between 
the interests of the Director and the interests of any other 
parties in carrying out the activities of the company; and

if requested by the Board, within a reasonable period, 
take such necessary and reasonable steps to remove any 
confl ict of interest.

If a Director cannot or is unwilling to remove a confl ict of interest 
then the Director must, in accordance with the Corporations Act 
2001, absent himself or herself from the room when discussion 
and/or voting occurs on matters about which the confl ict relates.

Director Education

Directors undergo an induction process upon appointment during 
which they are given a detailed briefi ng on the company. This 
includes meetings with key executives, tours of operational sites 
and presentations. Thereafter, in order to assist Directors to 
maintain an appropriate level of knowledge of the company and its 
operations, Directors undertake site visits and are provided with 
regular updates and briefi ngs on current and emerging issues. 

The Chairman sets aside time at the start of each scheduled Board 
meeting for non-executive Directors to meet with the Managing 
Director without other management present. In addition, the non-
executive Directors meet at least four times each year independent 
of management to discuss the position of the company and the 
performance of management.

Company Secretary

Mr Cameron Wilson is Iluka’s Company Secretary.  This position of 
Company Secretary is responsible for:

• 

• 

• 

• 

advising the Board on corporate governance principles; 

management of the company secretarial function;

attending all Board and Board committee meetings and 
taking minutes; and

communication with the Australian Securities Exchange 
(ASX).

Committees of the Board

To assist in the execution of its responsibilities and to allow 
detailed consideration of complex issues, the Board has 
established the following sub-committees:

Directors are encouraged to undertake continuing education 
relevant to the discharge of their duties. All reasonable costs of 
continuing Director education are met by the company.

• 

• 

Remuneration and Nomination Committee; and

Audit and Risk Committee.

Directors’ Access to Independent Advice

Each Director may, with prior written approval of the Chairman, 
obtain independent professional advice to assist the Director in 
fulfi lling their responsibilities. Any reasonable expenses incurred in 
obtaining that advice will be met by the company.

Board Meetings

The Board convenes on average for nine formal meetings per year 
including one meeting dedicated primarily to strategic planning.  
The agenda, frequency and length of meetings are determined 
by the Chairman in consultation with the Managing Director. The 
Chairman manages the conduct of meetings and strives to ensure 
open and constructive discussion between Board members and 
between the Board and management. Ad hoc Board and committee 
meetings may be convened to consider particular matters.

Each committee is comprised wholly of independent, non-executive 
Directors. The structure and membership of these committees 
are reviewed periodically. Each committee has its own written 
charter setting out its role and responsibilities, composition, 
structure, membership requirements and the manner in which the 
committee is to operate. Both of these charters are reviewed by 
the respective committees on an annual basis. Unless expressly 
delegated by the Board to one of its committees, all matters 
determined by committees are submitted to the full Board as 
recommendations for Board decision. Both the Remuneration 
and Nomination Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee are 
discussed separately below.

Board and Committee Performance Evaluation

The Board carries out a process of self-assessment regarding 
its performance in meeting key responsibilities. This annual 
review process serves to identify any areas of weakness and 
mechanisms for improving the functioning and performance of the 
Board, its relationship with management and to focus on specifi c 
performance objectives for the year ahead.  This annual review 
was last undertaken with the assistance of external consultants 
during September–December 2007.

Iluka Resources Limited 

89

Each of the Board’s committees also conducts an annual 
self-assessment of their performance in meeting their key 
responsibilities. These reviews serve to identify strengths, 
weaknesses and areas for improvement. The assessment for both 
committees was last undertaken in September–December 2007. 

Remuneration and Nomination Committee

The Remuneration and Nomination Committee consists of the 
following independent, non-executive Directors: Ms Valerie Davies 
(Chairman), Mr Ian Mackenzie, Mr John Pizzey and Mr Gavin Rezos.  
Details of Directors’ attendance at Remuneration and Nomination 
Committee meetings and their qualifi cations and experience are 
set out on pages 4 and 5.

The Committee’s responsibility is to provide assistance and 
recommendations to the Board in support of the company’s 
objective of creating and delivering value for shareholders and in 
fulfi lling its Corporate Governance responsibilities relating to the 
following:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

overall remuneration strategy of the company, its 
development, review and implementation; 

remuneration of executives and non-executive Directors; 

performance of the Managing Director and senior 
executives;

succession planning for key roles; and

assessment, composition and succession of the Board. 

Comprehensive details of the processes and principles underlying 
the work of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee are 
discussed in the Remuneration Report appearing on pages 8 to 18 
of this Report.

Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit and Risk Committee consists of the following 
independent, non-executive Directors: Mr Don Morley (Chairman), 
Mr Grahame Campbell, Dr Robert Every and Mr Ian Mackenzie.  
Mr Morley was a senior fi nancial executive of WMC Limited until 
his retirement in October 2002 and brings a high level of fi nancial 
expertise and experience to Iluka’s Audit and Risk Committee.  Full 
details of Mr Morley’s qualifi cations and experience and those of 
the other Committee members appear on pages 4 and 5.

The Committee regularly reviews the appropriateness of its 
composition in light of the skills and experiences of its members, 
the responsibilities of the Committee and having regard to any 
changes in the regulatory environment in which the company 
operates. At all times the Audit and Risk Committee is required 
under its charter to ensure that all members are fi nancially literate 
and have an appropriate understanding of the industries in which 
the company operates.

90

Annual Report 2007

The overall purpose of the Audit and Risk Committee is to 
protect the interests of the company’s shareholders and other 
stakeholders, on behalf of the Board, by overseeing processes in 
respect of:

• 

• 

• 

• 

the integrity of fi nancial reporting;

the adequacy of the control environment;

the process for the management of risk; and

the internal and external audit functions.

The broad responsibilities of the Audit and Risk Committee include 
assisting the Board to fulfi l its responsibilities by:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

considering the effectiveness of the accounting and internal 
control systems and management reporting, which are 
designed to safeguard company assets; 

serving as an independent and objective party to review 
fi nancial information prior to release to shareholders;

reviewing the accounting policies adopted within the group;

reviewing the performance of the internal and external 
audit functions;

evaluating the independence of the external auditor and 
ensuring that the provision of non-audit services by the 
external auditor does not adversely impact upon auditor 
independence;

reviewing and approving internal audit plans including 
identifi ed risk areas;

gaining assurance as to the adequacy of the company’s 
policies and processes for identifying, documenting and 
addressing risks;

reviewing other key fi nancial processes including tax, 
insurance, treasury operations and superannuation 
arrangements to ensure legal compliance and prudent 
management practices; and

reviewing processes and internal controls in place to 
ensure compliance with laws and regulations. 

In fulfi lling its responsibilities, the Audit and Risk Committee:

• 

• 

• 

• 

receives regular reports from management and the internal 
and external auditors;

meets regularly with the internal auditors, including 
meetings independent of management;

meets regularly with the external auditors, including 
meetings independent of management;

reviews any signifi cant disagreements between the 
auditors and management, irrespective of whether they 
have been resolved;

• 

• 

provides the internal and external auditors with a clear line 
of direct communication at any time to either the Chairman 
of the Audit and Risk Committee or the Chairman of the 
Board; and

has access to management as required and is able to seek 
third party expert advice if required.

Corporate Reporting

The Managing Director and Chief Financial Offi cer have made 
the following certifi cations to the Board with respect to the 2007 
accounts:

• 

• 

that the company’s fi nancial reports are complete and 
present a true and fair view, in all material respects, of the 
fi nancial condition and operational results of the company 
and group and are in accordance with relevant accounting 
standards; and

that the above statement is founded on a sound system of 
risk management and internal compliance and control and 
which implements the policies adopted by the Board and 
that the company’s risk management and internal control is 
operating effi ciently and effectively in all material respects.

Risk Assessment and Management

The Board, with assistance from the Audit and Risk Committee, 
is responsible for ensuring there are adequate processes and 
policies in place to identify, assess and mitigate risk. Iluka has 
implemented a formal Enterprise Risk Management program 
which establishes structured risk management processes, as 
well as ensuring that risk management concepts and awareness 
are embedded into the culture of the organisation. This program 
includes the involvement of senior executives, as well as the 
engagement of external risk management consultants as 
necessary. The key elements of Iluka’s risk management program 
are:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

classifi cation of risk into strategic, fi nancial, operational, 
compliance, information and project risks;

the quantifi cation and ranking of risk event consequences 
as insignifi cant through to catastrophic;

the processes to capture and document high-level risks;

processes to capture and document lower level risks 
through formalised site-based risk workshops and risk 
registers;

a comprehensive management representation program 
conducted twice annually which involves a detailed 
hierarchy of sign-offs on a wide range of risk issues; 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

the assignment of clear accountabilities for identifi ed risk 
issues to appropriate senior Iluka employees;

comprehensive regular reporting to the Board and senior 
management on key areas of safety, environment, treasury 
and exchange, legal matters and major projects;

targeted utilisation of both internal and external auditors to 
address specifi c areas of risk exposure and controls;

a company code of conduct providing the overarching 
context for behaviours and the way in which Iluka interacts 
with its stakeholders;

policies and procedures to address key internal controls;

the development of a company-wide intranet-based risk 
management database for communicating and updating 
progress on risk matters;

a fraud-control policy for the confi dential reporting of 
issues of unacceptable or undesirable conduct with 
protection against reprisal afforded to the whistleblower; 
and

• 

a comprehensive insurance program.

Audit Functions

The company’s current external auditing fi rm is 
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). During 2007, the company 
complied with its internal guidelines which require the fees paid to 
external auditors for non-audit-related work to remain below 50 
per cent of the audit-related fees without pre-approval by the Audit 
and Risk Committee. This guideline is intended to preserve the 
independence of the external audit function.

The external auditor will attend the Annual General Meeting 
and will be available to answer shareholder questions about the 
conduct of the audit and the preparation and content of the audit 
report.

Iluka has an internal audit function in part resourced by internal 
management and in part by KPMG. The internal audit function 
assists the Board by undertaking an objective evaluation of 
the company’s internal control framework. The Audit and Risk 
Committee is responsible for approving the program and scope 
of internal audit reviews to be conducted each fi nancial year. An 
assessment of the quality and focus of the internal audit function 
is undertaken periodically as part of the review of Audit and Risk 
Committee effectiveness.

Iluka Resources Limited 

91

The General Counsel and Company Secretary is responsible for 
communication with the ASX. This role includes responsibility for 
ensuring compliance with the continuous disclosure requirements 
in the ASX Listing Rules and overseeing and co-ordinating 
information disclosure to the ASX. In accordance with the ASX 
Listing Rules, the company immediately notifi es the ASX of 
information:

• 

• 

concerning the company that a reasonable person would 
expect to have a material effect on the price of the 
company’s securities; and

that would, or would be likely to, infl uence persons who 
commonly invest in securities in deciding whether to 
acquire or dispose of the company’s securities.  

Upon confi rmation of receipt from the ASX, the company places all 
information disclosed on the company’s website.

The company respects the rights of its shareholders and to 
facilitate the effective exercise of those rights, the company is 
committed to:

• 

• 

• 

• 

communicating effectively with shareholders through 
releases to the ASX, the company’s website, information 
distributed direct to shareholders and the general meetings 
of the company; 

giving shareholders ready access to balanced and 
understandable information about the company and 
corporate proposals;

making it easy for shareholders to participate in general 
meetings of the company; and 

requesting the external auditor to attend the Annual 
General Meeting and be available to answer shareholder 
questions about the conduct of the audit and the 
preparation and content of the auditor’s report. 

Iluka keeps shareholders and the market informed through the 
Annual Report, quarterly production and exploration reports and 
by disclosing material developments to the ASX as they occur. 
The company also makes available a telephone number and email 
address for shareholders to make inquiries of the company. 

From time to time, briefi ngs and site visits are arranged for share 
analysts and institutional investors. In conducting such briefi ngs, 
Iluka takes care to ensure that any price-sensitive information 
released is made available to all shareholders (institutional and 
private) and the broader investment market at the same time. 
Briefi ng materials are lodged with the ASX and then placed on the 
company’s website. 

Ethical Standards and Conduct

The company has an Employee Code of Conduct which identifi es 
the standard of ethical conduct expected of Iluka employees. In 
addition, the Board has specifi cally adopted a Code of Conduct for 
Directors which establishes guidelines for their conduct in carrying 
out their duties as Directors. 

Iluka has also established a fraud-control policy to provide for the 
confi dential reporting of issues of unacceptable or undesirable 
conduct (Business Conduct Reporting and Control Policy). The 
policy provides protection against reprisal to the whistleblower 
and enables confi dential disclosures to be made by the 
whistleblower to the fraud-control offi cer or, where applicable, if 
the matter is highly sensitive and the employee believes it more 
appropriate, direct to the internal audit function.

Securities Trading Policy

If Directors, offi cers and employees of the company intend to buy 
or sell the company’s securities (shares, options, warrants, etc.), 
they must do so in accordance with the company’s Securities 
Trading Policy.

Under the Securities Trading Policy, Directors and employees are 
prohibited from trading in the company’s securities if they are in 
possession of price-sensitive information which is not generally 
available to the market. In addition to this general prohibition, 
senior management and those employees involved in preparing the 
company’s statutory fi nancial information (“Restricted Employees”) 
and Directors are prohibited from buying or selling securities in 
the company during the period from the end of the fi nancial year 
or half fi nancial year to the time of the release of the annual or 
half-year results.

Prior to trading in the company’s securities, Directors must seek 
approval from the Chairman and Restricted Employees must seek 
approval from the General Counsel and Company Secretary.  In 
addition, Directors and Restricted Employees must confi rm to the 
Chairman or the General Counsel and Company Secretary (as the 
case may be) that they are not in possession of price-sensitive 
information that is not generally available to the market.

Shareholder Interface and Continuous Disclosure

The shareholders of the company elect Directors at an Annual 
General Meeting in accordance with the company’s constitution. 
Shareholders have the opportunity to express their views, ask 
questions about company business and vote on items of business 
for resolution by shareholders at the meeting. 

92

Annual Report 2007

m
a
e
T
p
i
h
s
r
e
d
a
e
L

lluka has a leadership team with extensive experience 
in the mineral sands and broader resources 
sector. Key technical capabilities in exploration, 
project development, operations and marketing is 
complemented by the corporate and head offi ce 
functions, led by Managing Director David Robb. 

Mark Adams, BSc (Mining Eng), MSc (Mineral 
Exploration), AusIMM
General Manager, Western Region
Mr Adams joined Iluka in 2006.  He has had an extensive 
career in the resources sector, including the gold, nickel 
and mineral sands business.  He spent six years with 
BHP as Mining Manager and then General Manager 
of the Cannington project. Mr Adams has also worked 
with Mount Isa Mines Ltd in senior mine development, 
technical and operational roles.

Peter Beilby, BSc (Mining Engineering)
General Manager, Murray Basin
Mr Beilby joined Iluka in 2001 and has over 25 years 
experience in the mining industry, including senior roles 
with the Wirralie Gold project in Queensland, Resident 
Manager of Normandy Mining for the Golden Crown 
mine, Project Manager for the Big Bell development and 
Resident Manager for the Silver Swan nickel mine.

Peter Benjamin, BSc (Hon), PostGrad Dip in 
Exploration and Business Admin
General Manager, Exploration and Geology
Mr Benjamin joined Iluka in 2001 as Group Manager 
Exploration. He was appointed to his current role 
in June 2006. Peter has extensive geological and 
exploration experience, holding roles with Australian 
Resources, Gold Mines of Australia and Mt Lyell Mining.

Matthew Blackwell, B Eng (Mech), Grad Dip 
(Tech Mgt), MBA
General Manager, Land Management
Mr Blackwell joined Iluka in 2004 as President, US 
Operations.  Prior to joining Iluka, Matthew was 
Executive Vice President of TSX listed Asia Pacifi c 
Resources and based in Thailand.  Mr Blackwell has a 
background in mining and processing with positions in 
project management, maintenance and production in the 
Australian mining industry.  

Simon Green, BA(Hons), ACA
General Manager, Finance & Commercial 
(Acting Chief Financial Offi cer)
Mr Green joined Iluka in 2006 as General Manager 
Finance after a twenty year career in audit and 
assurance with PricewaterhouseCoopers in Australia 
and the UK, specialising in the Energy and Resources 
sector. Mr Green was appointed acting Chief Financial 
Offi cer in January 2008.

Victor Hugo, BSc, MSc, PhD
General Manager, Sales and Marketing
Dr Hugo originally joined Iluka in 1998. After leaving 
Iluka in 2001 and working with the minerals sands 
industry research and consulting company TZMI, he 
re-joined Iluka in 2003 as General Manager Sales 
and Marketing. Dr Hugo was appointed to his present 
position in February 2006. He has also held positions 
with Richards Bay Minerals and Cable Sands.

Philip Nillsen, B Com, CA 
General Manager, Business Evaluation and Planning
Mr Nillsen joined Iluka in 1997.  He has worked in 
various corporate, fi nance, project and operational 
roles in Australia and the US. He was appointed Group 
Manager, Commercial in 2003.  In 2005, Mr Nillsen was 
appointed to the role of General Manager, Business 
Evaluations and Planning.

David McMahon, BCom
Chief Financial Offi cer (resigned January 2008)
Mr McMahon joined Iluka in January 2007 after 10 
years with Wesfarmers Energy Limited. Prior to joining 
Wesfarmers, David held senior corporate development 
and fi nance roles with Parkhill Lithgow & Gibson, 
Standard Chartered Australia Limited and Normandy 
Mining Limited. Mr McMahon resigned in January 2008, 
to relocate to Canada.

Robert Porter, BA (Hons), MSc, PhD
General Manager, Investor Relations and 
Corporate Affairs
Dr Porter joined Iluka in December 2005. He has 
worked in the investor relations area for over a decade 
with roles at BHP Billiton, BHP, Foster’s, Southcorp and 
Ampolex. Dr Porter has also held government relations 
roles at Westpac and BP.

Iluka Resources Limited 

93

 
Allan Sale
General Manager, USA
Mr Sale has over 40 years experience in the mineral sands industry 
covering a broad spectrum of the industry.  He joined Iluka in 1982 
after working at Richards Bay Minerals and Consolidated Rutile 
Limited.  He has extensive experience in the development and 
management of large scale and complex mining and processing 
operations. 

Hans Umlauff, B MEng (Hons), FIEAust
General Manager, South Australian Development &
Project Management
Mr Umlauff joined Iluka in June 2006 as Executive General 
Manager, Capital Projects. He has an extensive career in various 
Australian and international engineering, operational, project 
management and capital management roles with BHP Steel, BHP, 
Normandy Mining and Newmont Australia.

Steve Wickham,  Assoc. Dip in Mechanical Engineering 
General Manager, Technical Services and Best Practice
Mr Wickham is a mechanical engineer with extensive experience 
in senior and executive roles in Australia and South Africa in the 
manufacturing and mining sectors. Prior to joining Iluka in 2007, 
he was Chief Executive Offi cer of Ticor South Africa and Managing 
Director of Australian Zircon.

Cameron Wilson, LLB 
General Manager, Corporate Services and Company Secretary
Mr Wilson joined Iluka in late 2004 after seven years in a range of 
legal and commercial roles with WMC Resources Limited. He has 
specialised in mining, corporate and general commercial law for 
most of his professional career.

94

Annual Report 2007

The statement of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves 
presented in this Report has been produced in accordance 
with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral 
Resources and Ore Reserves, December 2004 (the JORC 
Code). 

The information in the 2007 Annual Report relating 
to Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves is based on 
information compiled by Competent Persons (as defi ned 
in the JORC Code).  Each of the Competent Persons 
for deposits located outside Australia are members of 
Recognised Overseas Professional Organisations (ROPOs) 
as listed by the ASX.  Each of the Competent Persons have, 
at the time of reporting, suffi cient experience relevant 
to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under 
consideration and to the activity they are undertaking to 
qualify as a Competent Person as defi ned by the JORC 
Code.  At the reporting date, each Competent Person listed 
in the 2007 Annual Report is a full-time employee of Iluka 
Resources Limited or Consolidated Rutile Limited.  Each 
Competent Person consents to the inclusion in the 2007 
Annual Report of the matters based on their information in 
the form and context in which it appears.

All of the Mineral Resources and Ore Reserve fi gures 
reported represent estimates at 31 December 2007.  All 
tonnes and grade information has been rounded, hence 
small differences may be present in the totals.  All of 
the Mineral Resources information is inclusive of Ore 
Reserves (i.e. Ore Reserves are a sub-set of Mineral 
Resources and are not additive). 

s
e
c
r
u
o
s
e
R

l
a
r
e
n
i
M
d
n
A
s
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
e
r
O

Iluka Resources Limited 

95

 
 
 
 
Iluka Ore Reserves Breakdown by Region and JORC Category at 31 December 2007

Summary of Ore Reserves(1)(2) for Iluka 

HM Assemblage(4)

Change

Rutile 
Grade  HM Tonnes
(%) 

Millions

5  

5  

5  

6  

6  

1  

1  

1  

13  

18  

16  

14  

14  

14  

-  

-   

-   

9  

7  

8  

6.42

(3.12)

(0.35)

3.16

(0.16)

0.06

6.01

Country 

Region 

Australia 

Eucla Basin 

Total 

Eucla Basin 

WA - Mid-West 

WA - Mid-West 

Total 

WA - Mid-West 

WA - South-West 

WA - South-West 

Total 

WA - South-West(5) 

Murray Basin 

Murray Basin 

Total 

Murray Basin(6) 

CRL North Stradbroke Island 

CRL North Stradbroke Island 

CRL North Stradbroke Island(7) 

Virginia 

Virginia 

Virginia(8) 

Proved 

Probable 

Grand Total 

Total 

 USA 

Total 

Total 

Total 

Total 

Notes: 
(1)  Competent Persons - Ore Reserves

Eucla Basin:  A Whatham (MAusIMM)

Ore Reserve 
Category (3) 

Ore Tonnes 
Millions 
$ 

In Situ HM 

HM 
Tonnes Millions  Grade 
(%) 

$ 

Probable 

Proved 

Probable 

Proved 

Probable 

Proved 

Probable 

Proved 

Probable 

Proved 

Probable 

98.4  

98.4  

9.0  

97.0  

106.0  

10.1  

59.8  

69.9  

20.4  

25.8  

46.2  

234.9  

125.7  

360.6  

20.1  

2.5  

22.6  

294.5  

409.3  

703.8  

6.42  

6.42  

0.66  

7.05  

7.71  

1.19  

5.57  

6.75  

3.82  

4.90  

8.72  

2.13  

1.00  

3.14  

1.82  

0.17  

1.99  

9.62  

25.11  

34.73  

6.5  

6.5  

7.3  

7.3  

7.3  

11.7  

9.3  

9.7  

18.8  

19.0  

18.9  

0.9  

0.8  

0.9  

9.1  

6.7  

8.8  

3.3  

6.1  

4.9  

Ilmenite 
Grade 
(%) 

Zircon 
Grade 
(%) 

28  

28  

52  

53  

53  

78  

76  

76  

49  

50  

49  

48  

47  

47  

72  

65  

71  

57  

51  

53  

50  

50  

14  

14  

14  

5  

9  

8  

11  

12  

12  

11  

11  

11  

16  

20  

16  

11  

22  

19  

       WA - Mid-West, WA - South-West and Murray Basin:  C Lee (MAusIMM)
       CRL North Stradbroke Island:  I Reudavey (MAIG)
       Virginia:  C Stilson (SME)
(2)  Ore Reserves are a sub-set of Mineral Resources.
(3)  Rounding may generate differences in last decimal place.
(4)  All mineralogy is reported as a percentage of in situ HM content.
(5)  Rutile component in WA - South-West operations is sold as a Leucoxene product.
(6)  Ilmenite currently has had no value ascribed in the reserve optimisation process for the Murray Basin. 
      Metallurgical testwork and marketing studies are presently underway; the outcomes of which may see a revision of the Ore Reserves.
(7)  Ore Reserve estimates are adjusted to refl ect Iluka ownership of 51.04% as at 31 December, 2007.
(8)  Rutile is included in Ilmenite for the Virginia region.

96

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
Iluka Ore Reserves Mined and Adjusted by Region at 31 December 2007

Summary of Ore Reserves Depletion(1)

Country 

Region 

Australia 

Total 

Eucla Basin 

Eucla Basin 

Eucla Basin 

 Ore Reserves 

Active Mines 

Non-Active Sites 

WA - Mid-West 

WA - Mid-West 

Active Mines 

Non-Active Sites 

Total 

WA - Mid-West 

WA - South-West 

WA - South-West 

Active Mines 

Non-Active Sites 

Total 

WA - South-West 

Murray Basin 

Murray Basin 

Murray Basin 

Active Mines 

Non-Active Sites 

CRL North Stradbroke Island  Active Mines 

CRL North Stradbroke Island  Non-Active Sites 

CRL North Stradbroke Island(4)   

Active Mines 

Non-Active Sites 

Virginia 

Virginia 

Virginia 

Active Mines 

Non-Active Sites 

Ore Reserves 

Total 

Total 

USA 

Total 

Total 

Total 

Total 

Notes: 

In Situ HM 
Tonnes 
Millions 
2006 

In Situ HM 
Tonnes 
Millions 
Mined 2007 

In Situ HM 
Tonnes(2) 
Millions 
Adjusted 2007 

In Situ HM 
Tonnes 
Millions 
2007 

In Situ HM
Tonnes(3)
Millions
Net Change

-   

-   

-   

3.14  

7.69  

10.83  

1.84  

5.27  

7.10  

2.63  

2.93  

5.56  

3.29  

-   

3.29  

1.04  

0.89  

1.93  

11.94  

16.78  

28.72  

-   

-   

-   

(1.19)  

-   

(1.19)  

(0.67)  

-   

(0.67)  

(0.66)  

-   

(0.66)  

(0.28)  

-   

(0.28)  

(0.35)  

-   

(0.35)  

(3.14)  

-   

(3.14)  

-   

6.42  

6.42  

(0.22)  

(1.71)  

(1.93)  

0.02  

0.30  

0.32  

0.00  

3.81  

3.81  

0.13  

-   

0.13  

0.18  

0.23  

0.41  

0.11  

9.05  

9.16  

-   

6.42  

6.42  

1.74  

5.97  

7.71  

1.19  

5.57  

6.75  

1.98  

6.74  

8.72  

3.14  

-   

3.14  

0.87  

1.12  

1.99  

8.91  

25.82  

34.73  

-  

6.42 

6.42 

(1.41) 

(1.71) 

(3.12) 

(0.65) 

0.30 

(0.35) 

(0.65) 

3.81 

3.16 

(0.16) 

-  

(0.16) 

(0.17) 

0.23 

0.06 

(3.03) 

9.05 

6.01 

(1)  Rounding may generate differences in last decimal place.

(2)  Adjusted fi gure includes write-downs and modifi cations in mine design.

(3)  Net change includes depletion by mining and adjustments.

(4)  Ore Reserve estimates are adjusted to refl ect Iluka ownership of 51.04% as at 31 December, 2007.

Iluka Resources Limited 

97

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Iluka Mineral Resource Breakdown by Region and JORC Category at 31 December 2007

Summary of Mineral Resources(1)(2) for Iluka 

 HM Assemblage(4)

Change

Rutile 
Grade  HM Tonnes
(%) 

Millions

5  
4  
5  

5  

7  
6  
6  

6  

1  
1  
2  

1  

13  
12  
14  

13  

14  
14  
13  

14  

-   
-   

-   

6 

7 

9 

7 

0.13 

(1.49) 

(4.36) 

4.30 

(0.65) 

(0.01) 

(2.07) 

Country 

Region 

Australia 

Eucla Basin 
Eucla Basin 
Eucla Basin(5) 

Total 

Eucla Basin 

WA - Mid-West 
WA - Mid-West 
WA - Mid-West 

Total 

WA - Mid-West 

WA - South-West 
WA - South-West 
WA - South-West 

Total 

WA - South-West(6) 

Murray Basin 
Murray Basin 
Murray Basin 

Total 

Murray Basin 

CRL North Stradbroke Island 
CRL North Stradbroke Island 
CRL North Stradbroke Island 

CRL North Stradbroke Island(7) 

Virginia 
Virginia 

Virginia(8) 

Measured 

Indicated 

Inferred 

Grand Total 

Total 

USA 

Total 

Total 

Total 

Total 

Total 

Mineral  
Resource 
Category(3) 

Measured 
Indicated 
Inferred 

Measured 
Indicated 
Inferred 

Measured 
Indicated 
Inferred 

Measured 
Indicated 
Inferred 

Measured 
Indicated 
Inferred 

Measured 
Indicated 

Material 
Tonnes 
Millions 

In Situ HM 
Tonnes 
Millions 

HM 
Grade 
(%) 

Ilmenite 
Grade 
(%) 

Zircon 
Grade 
(%) 

197.0  
21.9  
48.4  

267.3  

447.1  
257.9  
191.9  

897.0  

217.8  
128.3  
106.6  

452.7  

61.2  
139.9  
183.2  

384.4  

569.4  
43.0  
3.2  

615.7  

43.0  
0.4  

43.4  

1,535.5  

591.5  

533.3  

8.59  
0.46  
1.14  

10.19  

24.39  
12.90  
8.43  

45.72  

19.72  
9.00  
8.63  

37.35  

8.86  
16.05  
23.17  

48.08  

5.00  
0.45  
0.03  

5.49  

3.06  
0.02  

3.08  

69.62  

38.88  

41.40  

2,660.3  

149.90  

4.4  
2.1  
2.4  

3.8  

5.5  
5.0  
4.4  

5.1  

9.1  
7.0  
8.1  

8.2  

14.5  
11.5  
12.6  

12.5  

0.9  
1.0  
1.0  

0.9  

7.1  
4.2  

7.1  

4.5 

6.6 

7.8 

5.6 

29  
19  
13  

27  

52  
48  
50  

50  

79  
78  
73  

77  

48  
44  
53  

49  

47  
45  
44  

47  

69  
60  

69  

57 

53 

55 

55 

48  
51  
58  

49  

11  
11  
9  

11  

8  
8  
7  

8  

9  
9  
10  

10  

11  
11  
11  

11  

16  
16  

16  

15 

10 

11 

12 

Notes: 
(1) Competent Persons - Mineral Resources
Eucla Basin:  I Warland (MAusIMM)
WA - Mid-West and WA South-West:  I Shackleton (MAusIMM)
Murray Basin:  D Sleigh (MAusIMM)
CRL North Stradbroke Island:  I Reudavey (MAIG)
Virginia:  A Romeo (SME)

(2) Mineral Resources are inclusive of Ore Reserves.
(3) Rounding may generate differences in last decimal place.
(4) All mineralogy is reported as a percentage of in situ HM content.
(5) Mineral Resource estimates include a 51% interest in the Colona JV (Tripitaka) by Iluka as at 31 December, 2007.  
     This represents 69% Iluka ownership of HM tonnes for the Tripitaka Mineral Resource.
(6) Rutile component in WA - South-West operations is sold as a Leucoxene product.
(7) Mineral Resource estimates are adjusted to refl ect Iluka ownership of 51.04% as at 31 December, 2007.
(8) Rutile is included in Ilmenite for the Virginia region.

98

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
t
n
e
m
p
o
l
e
v
e
D
e
l
b
a
n
i
a
t
s
u
S

Sustainability is a key component of shareholder value 
creation and delivery for Iluka, and a central component 
of the company’s licence to operate. 

An external audit of Iluka’s Environment, Health and 
Safety systems was conducted at three operational 
sites in Queensland, Victoria and USA during 2007, with 
all other sites conducting self assessments. The average 
compliance score was 80.38 per cent.

Health and Safety

Health and safety remained a major focus for Iluka 
during 2007, as the company continued to improve 
performance. Iluka recorded a decrease in the overall 
number and severity of work place injuries during the 
year, with only medical treatment injuries increasing. 
The reporting of minor injuries will continue to be 
encouraged to ensure near miss incidents are properly 
assessed and managed.

Iluka’s loss time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) in 2007 
was 1.7, a reduction of 35 per cent from 2006. This 
equated to 9 Loss Time Injuries in 2007 compared to 17 
in 2006, the majority being soft tissue injuries due to 
strains. This is signifi cantly below the mining industry 
open cut metaliferrous LTIFR of 5.1.  The effective 
management of soft tissue injuries led to a reduction in 
the LTIFR but a corresponding increase in the medical 
treatment injury frequency rate which was 8.3 at the 
end of 2007, an increase of 26 per cent compared 
with 6.6 in 2006.  The all injury frequency rate (AIFR) 
improved with a 17 per cent reduction from 32.5 in 2006 
to 27 in 2007.  Iluka’s AIFR target for 2008 is 25.

The improved safety performance was the result 
of greater employee awareness and accountability, 
the continued use of risk assessment tools and the 
application of the Incident Cause Analysis Method to 
learn from adverse events.  Behavioural based safety 
programs were reviewed during the year and introduced 
at all operational sites.  The Iluka Action Tracking 
System was further improved with new internet based 
forms resulting in easier access for employees. 

During 2007, the company continued to pursue a range 
of health initiatives including:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

monitoring for health related exposures;

site discussions on lifestyle issues relating to 
health;

fatigue management in relation to long distance 
driving; 

audiometric testing; 

health and skin checks to assist in the early 
detection of skin cancer; and

infl uenza vaccinations.

People

Iluka recognises that a strong relationship with its 
employees is critical to support the achievement of its 
business objectives.  A full review of the company’s 
attraction and retention programs were completed in 
2007 to ensure employee alignment with the business 
plan.

Approximately 1600 people were employed at Iluka 
at the end of 2007 including operators, engineers, 
geologists and various other management and 
professional positions. In addition to this, contract 
mining and other activities account for an additional 
1000 personnel. 

Working with Communities

The quality and transparency of Iluka’s consultation 
with key stakeholders has been a key underpinning 
for the continuation of Iluka’s mining and processing 
operations, and in establishing its credentials in new 
areas of operation. 

In this regard, the company has a longstanding 
commitment to community consultation as an integral 
part of project planning and approvals, ongoing 
operational activities, as well as mine closure and 
rehabilitation planning. 

Iluka Resources Limited 

99

 
Iluka also maintains a targeted community support program to 
deliver both fi nancial and in-kind benefi ts to the communities 
in which it operates. Major contributions during 2007 included: 
Landcare Australia, education grants for the Far West Coast Native 
Title Group in South Australia, Orchestra Victoria, and in Western 
Australia the Capel Town Hall redevelopment, Iluka Busselton Jetty 
Swim, Catchment Kids Program, Gingin Environment Centre and 
the Midwest Clontarf Football Academy.  

The main issues that Iluka considers on an ongoing basis when 
working with communities include: impact on amenity, use of 
resources, such as water and energy, increased traffi c, land use, 
and overall social and economic benefi ts to a region. 

In Western Australia, community engagement at the Waroona 
mine site presented considerable challenges in 2007. Because of 
the close proximity of the operations to the township, a number 
of complaints were made by residents, mainly related to noise 
and dust. The company responded comprehensively to these 
concerns and implemented a range of noise mitigation activities.  
In addition, predictive noise modelling studies were undertaken to 
better understand the complex interplay between noise generated 
from its operations and that of ambient noise.  

As one example of the company’s engagement with communities, 
in South Australia an agreement was reached with the Far West 
Coast native title claimant group for mining activities on the 
Jacinth-Ambrosia and Tripitaka zircon deposits in the Eucla Basin.  
The agreement will provide direct economic compensation as well 
as educational, training and employment opportunities for the local 
indigenous population.  

Environment

Iluka is committed to operating in a responsible manner to 
reduce the impact of its mining and processing operations on the 
environment, maintain environmental biodiversity, and facilitate 
successful rehabilitation of areas previously mined. 

All environmental incidents recorded on site are classifi ed 
according to the severity of their impact1. During 2007, there was 
a 44 per cent reduction in Level 2 and Level 3 incidents, and a 23 
per cent increase in reported Level 1 incidents as a result of better 
systems, training and increased employee awareness.

One level 3 environmental incident occurred in 2007.  The incident 
occurred at the Eneabba mine site and involved the accidental 
clearing of 11.3 hectares of the South Eneabba Nature Reserve, 
including 5.7 hectares of native vegetation.  Iluka worked with the 
relevant West Australian regulatory authorities and effectively 
implemented measures to prevent a similar event occurring in the 
future. 

1  Level 1 – 5 rating system; Level 5 referring to the most serious environmental 

impact.  There were no Level 4 or 5 incidents in 2007.

100

Annual Report 2007

The main environmental issues identifi ed at Iluka’s operations 
continued to include: water usage, greenhouse gas emissions, 
energy usage, dust control, noise emissions, rehabilitation and 
biodiversity. 

Water Management

Water management continues to be a key priority at Iluka’s 
operations.  Iluka’s overall water usage increased by 16 per cent 
in 2007.   The increase in water consumption was associated with 
increased dredging operations at CRL, commencement of mining 
operations in the Murray Basin and previous under reporting in 
2006 in respect of the Mid West mining operations.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Management

The company recognises the importance attached to the level of 
greenhouse gas emissions as a potential contributor to climate 
change, and the increased governmental and societal focus on 
various potential schemes to reduce carbon dioxide equivalent 
(CO2e) emissions.  

In 2007, Iluka established a Greenhouse Strategy Working Group 
to ensure a better understanding of the evolving legislative 
environment for greenhouse gas emissions and to formulate, in 
this context, appropriate management initiatives in relation to 
Iluka’s greenhouse gas footprint. A focus of this work includes 
the use of coal in the synthetic rutile kiln process, fuels in its 
operations, in addition to indirect energy production through 
electricity consumption.  

Iluka’s CO2e emissions decreased by 6.6 per cent to 1,648 kilo 
tonnes in 2007, mainly due to decreased synthetic rutile production 
levels and improved energy use.  

The amount of energy used at Iluka’s operations increased by 9 
per cent between 2006 and 2007.  Iluka’s South West and Mid West 
operations consumed 48 per cent and 38 per cent respectively 
of the company’s total (including CRL) energy consumption, 
predominantly for the production of synthetic rutile where coal 
represents 54.7 per cent of the total energy consumption. 

Iluka is registered under the Australian Energy Effi ciency 
Opportunity Act and will audit energy consumption throughout 
2008.

Air Emissions 

Reviews of all air emission data (oxides of sulphur, carbon dioxide, 
oxides of nitrogen, particulates and water) is regularly conducted 
by internal personnel and external independent experts.  Iluka’s 
sites operate within relevant approved levels and national 
standards and do not pose a threat to the community or the 
environment.  Oxides of Nitrogen are detailed for the fi rst time in 
this report.

 
The overall level of particulates generated by Iluka increased by 
66 per cent due to the poor condition of the North Capel dedusting 
stack and a four month shutdown at Narngulu.  CRL contributed 55 
per cent of Iluka’s total particulates which was due to increased 
production and wind erosion during unusually dry conditions. 

Dust Control

Dust control at mine sites continued to be a focus for the company. 
Earth moving activities have the potential to generate dust, as do 
stockpiles of topsoil, overburden and waste. To minimise airborne 
dust, Iluka continued its practice of stabilising those areas using 
a combination of water, clay fi nes sourced from the mineral 
concentration process and hydro mulching with a mixture of annual 
grasses to aid the establishment of vegetative cover.  Priority is 
placed on stripping vulnerable areas during wetter and less windy 
months. 

Noise Emissions

Iluka actively seeks to minimise the impact of noise on surrounding 
neighbours from its mining and processing activities.  Noise 
management programs are developed for all new sites to help 
reduce noise where applicable and includes activities such as: 
baseline noise surveys conducted prior to commencing operations, 
predictive noise modelling to simulate known noise sources 
including environmental noise, restricting operating hours during 
high risk periods and the creation of noise bund walls and berms.  
Noise management plans are a key component of each site’s 
licence to operate. 

Planning

For each new project, Iluka develops a detailed environmental 
management plan to address any signifi cant environmental risks 
and to minimise land disturbance. These studies are undertaken in 
accordance with the environmental approvals process as required 
by the relevant State Government authority. 

During 2007, a range of environmental studies were undertaken 
which included:

• 

• 

• 

• 

ground and surface water monitoring and vegetation 
surveys for new projects;

pre-mining studies at Tutunup in Western Australia, 
including a vegetation survey, groundwater and surface 
water monitoring;

vegetation, fauna and soil studies for the Jacinth and 
Ambrosia deposits in the Eucla Basin of South Australia; 
and

various environmental studies for Murray Basin Stage 2 in 
Victoria.

Rehabilitation

Iluka undertakes a number of measures to minimise land 
disturbance during mining and to re-establish disturbed areas 
as sustainable ecosystems and community assets, upon the 
completion of mining.  In 2007, the amount of land disturbed 
decreased by 11 per cent compared with 2006 as fewer new 
mining areas were opened while the amount of rehabilitated land 
increased by 42 per cent. 

Biodiversity

Critical to protecting biodiversity is an understanding of the fl ora 
and fauna present within and around any potential disturbance 
areas. When signifi cant species or ecosystems are identifi ed 
during pre-mining, environmental assessments, specifi c research 
and management plans are implemented.

Iluka Resources Limited 

101

Supplementary EHS Statistical Data 2002 - 2007

Table 1: Iluka Safety Performance 
Injuries and Frequency Rates 2002 - 2007

Fatality 

LTI 

LTIFR 

MTI  

MTIFR 

First Aid 

FAIFR 

AIFR 

Minor 

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006  2007

0 

28 

6.3 

70 

16 

NA 

60.1 

NA 

NA 

0 

21 

4.7 

32 

6.7 

246 

72.9 

64.5 

309 

0 

7 

1.4 

42 

8.5 

210 

48.4 

52.3 

315 

0 

11 

1.9 

34 

5.7 

191 

27.6 

39.7 

435 

0 

17 

2.6 

43 

6.6 

152 

0

9

1.7

44

8.3

91

24.7 

17.1

32.5 

27

572 

563

2008 AIFR target: 25

Table 2: Site Safety Performance - Injuries 2007

Fatality 

LTI 

MTI 

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

Total 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4 

4 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

9 

8 

23 

2 

5 

0 

0 

4 

2 

FA 

21 

49 

5 

5 

0 

1 

5 

5 

MINOR

129

143

77

105

1

2

67

39

44 

91 

563 

Table 3: Site Drug Tests 2006 and 2007

2006 

2007

# Tests 

  % Detect 

# Tests 

% Detect

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

Total 

0 

558 

81 

265 

2 

0 

30 

49 

985 

0.0 

3.2 

7.4 

2.3 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

4.1 

3.3 

201 

199 

385 

188 

24 

0 

68 

143 

1208 

1.5

0.5

0.3

1.1

0

0

5.9

1.4

1.1

Table 4: Iluka Environment Incidents 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

2,459 

2,317 

137 

37 

1 

0 

97 

10 

0 

0 

927 

157 

1,085 

58 

2 

0 

0 

3 

0 

0 

846 

16 

1 

0 

0 

1,055

8

1

0

0

2,634 

2,424 

1,086 

1,146 

863 

1,064

Level 1 

Level 2 

Level 3 

Level 4 

Level 5 

TOTAL 

Table 5: Site Safety Performance - Frequency Rates 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

LTIFR  MTIFR 

LTIFR  MTIFR 

LTIFR  MTIFR  AIFR 

LTIFR  MTIFR  AIFR 

LTIFR  MTIFR  FAIFR  AIFR 

LTIFR  MTIFR  FAIFR  AIFR

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

Total 

Table Key

6 

6 

8.7 

NA 

NA 

6.6 

5.6 

2.2 

6.3 

12.7 

13 

20.8 

NA 

NA 

13.2 

30.8 

6.5 

16 

7.3 

3.5 

6.4 

8.5 

0 

2 

8.5  56.7 

2.4 

5.6  43.7 

14.1  72.3 

3 

9.8  65.3 

10 

11.7 

4.6 

3.1  65.9 

4.3 

4.3  19.9 

0 

0 

0  19.3 

0  76.4 

2.4 

11.9  28.6 

0 

0 

0 

4.3  50.5 

4.1  40.8 

4.6 

16 

NA 

NA 

0 

3.9 

0 

4.7 

NA 

NA 

3.1 

5.8 

NA 

6.7 

0 

NA 

1.4 

6.6 

NA 

23 

NA 

2.6 

0  15.7 

1.8 

1.8 

NA  14.5  46.2 

0 

0 

2.9 

4.3 

0 

5.4 

0 

0 

4.4 

16.7 

24 

13.5 

43.3  61.1 

5.2 

6.7 

0 

0 

31.9  37.1 

13.5  25.6 

5 

6.7 

5.3 

11 

5 

6.7 

8.9 

11 

3.3 

2.5 

2.3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

6.7 

17.5  27.5

13.5 

30.2  46.2

4.6 

7.9 

0 

0 

7.3 

3 

11.4  18.3

7.9  15.8

0 

0

17.1  17.1

9.1  16.4

7.5  10.5

8.5  52.3 

1.9 

5.7  39.7 

2.6 

6.6 

24.7  32.5 

1.7 

8.3 

17.1 

27

AIFR  =  All Injury Frequency Rate (include LTI, MTI and FAI)
FAI  =  First Aid Injury
FAIFR  =  First Aid Injury Frequency Rate
LTI  =  Lost Time Injury

LTIFR  =  Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate
MTI  =  Medical Treatment Injury 
MTIFR  =  Medical Treatment Injury Frequency Rate 
NA  =  Not Available

**  Other: Geology, Exploration, WA Projects, Eucla Basin project, Murray Basin Stage 2 project, Corporate 

102

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Table 6: Site Environment Incidents for 2007

Table 9: Site Oxides of Nitrogen (tonnes - t) 2002 - 2007

Environmental 
Performance 

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

Total 

Level 1 

Level 2 

Level 3 

Level 4 

Level 5

142 

567 

240 

38 

1 

0 

55 

12 

1,055 

1 

5 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

8 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Table 7: Site Particulates (tonnes - t) 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

South West 

Mid West 

154 

276 

Murray Basin 

NA 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

4 

93 

NA 

0 

NA 

184 

249 

NA 

330 

58 

NA 

0 

NA 

163 

348 

0 

292 

63 

NA 

4 

NA 

Total 

527 

821 

870 

138 

274 

0 

486 

63 

0 

3 

NA 

964 

78 

235 

0 

642 

17 

0 

7 

191

333

187

897

5

0

8

NA 

NA

979 

1,621

Table 8: Site Oxides of Sulphur (tonnes - t) 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

South West 

4,571 

3,407 

5,982 

7,446 

7,405 

7,200

Mid West 

327 

Murray Basin 

NA 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

4 

28 

NA 

NM 

NA 

287 

NA 

8 

34 

NA 

3 

NA 

454 

535 

275 

151

0 

3 

32 

NA 

5 

NA 

5 

5 

30 

19 

15 

NA 

0 

3 

9 

0 

27 

NA 

0

0

8

0

26

NA

Total 

4,930 

3,739 

6,476 

8,055 

7,719 

7,385

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

South West 

Mid West 

NM 

NM 

Murray Basin  NM 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

Total 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NA 

0 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NA 

0 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NA 

0 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NA 

0 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NA 

0 

147

0

24

443

3

0

202

NA

819

Table 10: Site Water Use (mega litres - ML) 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

South West 

5,289 

5,274 

4,513 

5,152 

5,781 

4,880

Mid West 

14,919 

17,469 

14,137 

15,359 

14,320 

17,558

Murray Basin 

NA 

NA 

2 

1,553 

1,122 

2,392

CRL 

25,687 

25,329 

54,000 

26,196 

23,711 

27,272

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

1,502 

1,500 

1,707 

1,524 

1,150 

NA 

1,119 

NM 

NA 

347 

NM 

324 

433 

141 

1,005 

3,275 

1,196 

2,092

NM 

NM 

11 

1

779

6

Total 

48,516 

49,919 

75,688 

53,492 

47,432 

54,980

Table 11: Site Water Discharge (mega litres - ML) 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

South West 

3,375 

4,886 

4,252 

6,961 

3,981 

6,509

Mid West 

0 

Murray Basin 

NA 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

0 

819 

NA 

0 

NA 

0 

NA 

0 

1,432 

NA 

14 

NA 

0 

NA 

0 

962 

93 

3 

NA 

0 

0 

0 

931 

170 

0 

NA 

0 

6 

0 

152 

10 

262 

6 

36

26

1,422

1,415

0

159

0

Total 

4,194 

6,332 

5,310 

8,062 

4,417 

9,567

Table Key

NA  =  Not Available
NM  =  Not Measured

**Other: Geology, Exploration, WA Projects, Eucla Basin Project, Murray Basin Stage 2 Project, Corporate

Iluka Resources Limited 

103

 
 
 
 
 
Table 12: Site Water Recycled (mega litres - ML) 2002 - 2007

Table 14: Site Energy Resources Used (%) 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

Total 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NM 

0

0

1

25,865

155

0

1,546

0

NM 

27,567

Coal 

Electricity 

58.7 

15.6 

Natural Gas 

10.3 

LPG 

Diesel 

Petrol 

Fuel, Oil 
& Greases 

Total 

1.1 

11.2 

0.1 

3.0 

100 

60.5 

15.5 

10.6 

0.1 

11.6 

0.1 

1.6 

100 

59.7 

16.1 

10.2 

0.1 

12.6 

0.1 

1.2 

100 

59.7 

19.2 

9.8 

0.1 

9.4 

0.1 

1.7 

100 

61.1 

15.8 

7.4 

0.0 

15.0 

0.0 

0.7 

100 

54.8

14.9

10.3

0.0

19.6

0.1

0.3

100

Table 13: Site Energy Use (Terajoules - TJ) 2002 - 2007

Table 15: Site Greenhouse Gases (kt CO2e) 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

South West 

5,862 

Mid West 

5,416 

5,897 

5,323 

6,447 

5,440 

6,663 

6,441 

6,019 

6,206 

7,725

6,047

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

NA 

571 

530 

NA 

243 

NM 

NA 

518 

424 

NA 

335 

NM 

NA 

519 

356 

213 

470 

NM 

112 

579 

378 

313 

501 

NM 

249 

793 

140 

220 

521 

4 

591

884

132

4

515

11

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

578 

615 

NA 

121 

59 

NA 

24 

NA 

596 

614 

NA 

179 

147 

NA 

71 

NA 

646 

627 

NA 

158 

85 

50 

69 

NA 

665 

691 

17 

192 

217 

188 

71 

NA 

651 

713 

46 

240 

19 

26 

70 

NA 

584

649

98

209

17

14

76

1

Total 

12,622 

12,497 

13,445 

14,565 

14,574 

15,909

Total 

1,397 

1,607 

1,635 

2,041 

1,765 

1,648

Table 16: Site Land Use - Disturbed, Rehabilitated, Open (hectares - Ha) 2002 - 2007

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007

Disturbed  Rehab  Disturbed  Rehab  Disturbed  Rehab  Open  Disturbed  Rehab  Open  Disturbed  Rehab Open  Disturbed  Rehab  Open

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

120 

193 

NA 

140 

212 

NA 

74 

NA 

183 

73 

NA 

124 

368 

NA 

31 

NA 

130 

210 

NA 

98 

193 

NA 

90 

NA 

104 

119 

NA 

68 

53 

NA 

41 

NA 

285 

129 

104 

167 

152 

231 

121 

NA 

200  1,785 

127  1,440 

NA 

66 

17 

14 

55 

NA 

104 

498 

699 

208 

419 

NA 

135 

101 

306 

127 

36 

285 

134 

NA 

133  1,864 

268  1,763 

0 

76 

375 

542 

149  1,450 

158 

67 

NA 

826 

371 

1 

172 

164 

73 

140 

0 

0 

113 

75 

134  1,902 

146  1,781 

0 

79 

448 

607 

447  1,003 

137 

71 

2 

689 

413 

74 

269 

131 

50 

101 

0 

0 

83 

49 

264 

1,907

54 

58 

36 

292 

646 

77 

59 

1,858

440

672

711

43

419

64

Total 

739 

779 

721 

385 

1,189 

479  5,153 

1,124 

851  7,192 

737 

1,016  6,917 

683 

1,486 

6,114

**Other: Geology, Exploration, WA Projects, Eucla Basin Project, Murray Basin Stage 2 Project, Corporate

104

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
Table 17: Site Waste Management Practices 2007

Chemical & Lab Waste 

Hydrocarbon Contam 

Tyres 

Paper & Cardboard 

Scrap Metal 

Grease & Oil 

Batteries

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

Table Key

- 

L/T 

L/T 

L/T 

L/T 

- 

C 

- 

- 

L 

- 

L/T 

- 

- 

C/T 

- 

C 

L/RU 

RE 

- 

RE/C 

L/RU 

RE/C 

L/RE 

RU/RE 

L/RE 

RE 

RU/RE 

L/C 

L/RU 

L/RE 

RE/C 

RU/RE 

RE/C 

RE 

RE/C 

RE/C 

RU/RE 

RE/C 

RE/C 

RU 

RE/T 

C 

RE/C 

- 

- 

C/T/RE 

- 

RU/RE

RU/RE

RE

RE/C

RE/C

-

RE/C

-

L  =   Disposal to Land Fill 
RU  =   Re-Use 
RE  =   Recycling 

T  = 
C  = 
= 
- 

Treatment off-site  
Collected by licensed contractor for a range of uses
not applicable

Table 18: Site Waste Management (tonnes - t) 2007

Chemical & Lab Waste 

Hydrocarbon Contam 

Tyres 

Paper & Cardboard 

Scrap Metal 

Grease & Oil 

Batteries

South West 

Mid West 

Murray Basin 

CRL 

Florida 

Georgia 

Virginia 

Other ** 

0 

5 

3 

1 

1 

0 

1 

0 

0 

87 

3 

55 

0 

0 

3 

0 

NA 

NA 

17 

0 

6 

8 

1 

2 

NA 

5 

6 

27 

60 

24 

21 

NA 

545 

364 

18 

537 

600 

200 

9 

NA 

NA 

384 

27 

1 

0 

0 

88 

0 

3

NA

2

3

NA

0

NA

0

**Other: Geology, Exploration, WA Projects, Eucla Basin Project, Murray Basin Stage 2 Project, Corporate

Iluka Resources Limited 

105

 
 
Figure 1: Iluka Environment, Health & Safety Management System Compliance

Figure 2: Iluka Level 2 and above Environmental Incidents

6
4 8
8

5
8

9
8

1
8

8
7

5
7

6
8 7
7

8
3
.
0
8

0
0
.
1
8

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

t
n
a

i
l

p
m
o
C
%

L
R
C

n
i
s
a
B
y
a
r
r
u
M

l

u
u
g
n
r
a
N
W
M

i

i

n
g
n
G
W
M

i

i

a
n
g
r
i
V

i

i

g
n
n
M
W
S

a
b
b
a
e
n
E
W
M

g
n
i
s
s
e
c
o
r
P
W
S

Site

7
0
‘

e
g
a
r
e
v
a

a
k
u
l
I

6
0
‘

e
g
a
r
e
v
a

a
k
u
l
I

Level 2 and above Environmental Incidents

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

5
7
1

9
5
1

7
0
1

1
6

02       03      04       05 

7
1

06 

9

07 

106

Annual Report 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n
o
i
t
a
m
r
o
f
n
I

e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C

Company Contact Details

Uncertifi cated Shareholders

Iluka Resources Limited 
ABN: 34 008 675 018

Registered Offi ce:
Level 23, 140 St George’s Terrace 
PERTH WA 6000

Postal Address:
GPO Box U1988 
PERTH WA 6845 Australia

Telephone:  +61 8 9360 4700
Facsimile:  +61 8 9360 4777 
Website:  www.iluka.com

This site contains information on Iluka’s products, 
marketing, operations, ASX releases, fi nancial and 
quarterly reports.  It also contains links to other sites, 
including the share registry.

Share Registry Inquiries

Shareholders who require information about 
their shareholdings, dividend payments or related 
administrative matters should contact the company’s 
share registry:

Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited
Level 2, Reserve Bank Building 
45 St Georges Terrace
PERTH WA 6000 

Postal Address: 
GPO Box D182
PERTH WA 6840 

Telephone:  +61 8 9323 2000 or 1300 557 010
Facsimile:  +61 8 9323 2033
Website:   www.computershare.com 

Each inquiry should refer to the shareholder number 
which is shown on issuer-sponsored holding statements 
and dividend statements. 

Stock Exchange Listing

Iluka’s shares are listed on the Australian Securities 
Exchange Limited.  The company is listed as “Iluka” with 
an ASX code of ILU.

Change of Address

Shareholders who have changed their address should 
give written advice of the change, quoting the relevant 
shareholder number, to the company’s share registry. 

The share register was converted on 27 April, 1998.  
Information regarding the company’s issuer-sponsored 
holdings is available from the company’s share registry.

Shareholder Review and Full Annual Report 
Mailing List

All shareholders are entitled to receive an Annual 
Shareholder Review and an Annual Report.  Shareholders 
wishing to receive one or both of these documents should 
write to the share registry and quote their shareholder 
number.  For new shareholders an election form is 
available to receive a copy of the Annual Shareholder 
Review and Annual Report.

Copies of the reports are available on Iluka’s website 
www.iluka.com.

Payment of Dividends

The Board of Directors announced its intention not to pay 
a fi nal dividend for 2007.

Tax File Numbers (TFN) 

The company is obliged to deduct tax from dividend 
payments, other than those which are fully franked, 
to shareholders registered in Australia who have not 
quoted their TFN to the company. Forms for notifying TFNs 
are sent to all new shareholders of the company. For 
shareholders who have not already quoted a TFN, they 
may do so by contacting the company’s share registry.  

2008 Calendar

21 February  Announcement of full year results

19 May 

Closure of acceptances of proxies for AGM

21 May 

Annual General Meeting – Parmelia Hilton, 
Perth, Western Australia

21 August 

Announcement of half year results

31 December  Financial year end

All dates are indicative and subject to change. 
Shareholders are advised to check with the company to 
confi rm timings.

Iluka Resources Limited 

107

 
 
108

Annual Report 2007

I
n
s
i
g
h
t
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
&
D
e
s
i
g
n