JD Sports Fashion Plc
Hollinsbrook Way
Pilsworth
Bury BL9 8RR
Telephone 0161 767 1000
Facsimile 0161 767 1001
Corporate website
www.jdplc.com
Trading websites
www.jdsports.co.uk
www.size.co.uk
www.scottsonline.co.uk
www.bankfashion.co.uk
www.chausport.com
www.getthelabel.com
www.champion.ie
www.canterbury.com
www.canterburynz.com.au
www.canterburynz.net.nz
www.canterburynzusa.com
www.kooga-rugby.com
www.kukrisports.com
www.nicholasdeakins.com
Other websites
www.thedufferofstgeorge.com
2
Contents
Summary of Key
Performance Indicators
7
The Group
at a Glance
8
Executive Chairman’s
Statement
13 – 16
Financial and
Risk Review
19 – 21
Property and
Stores Review
26 – 27
Corporate and
Social Responsibility
31 – 35
The
Board
36
Directors’
Report
38 – 39
Corporate
Governance Report
41 – 43
Directors’
Remuneration Report
45 – 48
Statement of
Directors’ Responsibilities
52
Independent
Auditor’s Report
54
Consolidated
Income Statement
56
Group and Company Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income
56
Group and Company Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position
57
Group and Company Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Equity
58
Group and Company Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
59
Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements
60 – 102
Five Year
Record
103
Financial
Calendar
104
Shareholder
Information
104
3
4
You
are
now
entering
JD
country
Large format outdoor media, Trafford, Manchester
Manchester United vs Manchester City, 11 February 2011
5
6
A selection of footwear from the JD Easter 2011 campaign
Summary of Key
Performance
Indicators
Business Highlights
52 weeks to 29
January 2011
£000
52 weeks to 30
January 2010
£000
%
Change
883,669
769,785
+14.8
49.5%
79,927
81,565
(4,284)
75,643
78,629
114.84p
116.86p
23.00p
86,140
49.3%
67,294
67,391
(4,986)
62,308
61,393
88.16p
93.64p
18.00p
60,465
+18.8
+21.0
+21.4
+28.1
+30.3
+24.8
+27.8
Revenue
Gross profit %
Operating profit (before exceptional items)
Profit before tax and exceptional items
Exceptional items (i)
Operating profit
Profit before tax
Basic earnings per ordinary share
Adjusted basic earnings per ordinary share
Total dividend payable per ordinary share
Net cash at end of year (ii)
(i) Excludes share of exceptional items of joint
venture
(ii) Net cash consists of cash and cash
equivalents together with interest-bearing
loans and borrowings
• Total revenue increased by 14.8% to £883.7
million (2010: £769.8 million) with like for like
revenue increased by 3.1% (Sports Fascias
3.8%; Fashion Fascias -0.7%)
• Gross margin improved to 49.5% (2010: 49.3%)
with increased margin in all reporting segments
although the increase is diluted by greater
participation in Group performance from lower
margin distribution businesses which now
represent 9.5% of Group revenue (2010: 5.4%)
• Capital expenditure increased by £10.1 million to
£33.0 million (2010: £22.9 million) which included
the first three JD stores in France
• The new leased warehouse building shell in
Rochdale (866,250 sq ft including mezzanines)
has now been handed over by the developers and
the fit out process has started. Total anticipated fit
out costs are approximately £20.0 million of which
£3.9 million was incurred in the year. The move
to full operational use will be phased through the
early months of 2012
• Group profit before tax and exceptional items up
21% to £81.6 million (2010: £67.4 million)
• Final dividend payable increased by 31% to
• Profit before tax up 28% to £78.6 million
(2010: £61.4 million)
• Net cash position at the period end increased
to £86.1 million (2010: £60.5 million)
• Acquisition of Sonneti, Chilli Pepper and
Nanny State brands
19.2p (2010: 14.7p) bringing the total dividends
payable for the year up to 23.0p (2010: 18.0p),
an increase of 28% with a cumulative rise of 92%
over the last two years
• Acquisition of Champion completed post
year end, enhancing presence in the Republic
of Ireland
883.7
769.8
670.9
592.2
530.6
86.1
60.5
81.6
67.4
53.6
43.4
23.5
25.1
10.9
11.7
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Revenue (£m)
Net cash (£m)
Profit before tax and
exceptional items (£m)
7
Established in 1981 with a single store in Bury,
in the North West of England, JD Sports Fashion
Plc is now an international retailer and distributor
of sport and athletic inspired fashion clothing
and footwear.
The Group now has over 500 stores across a
number of retail fascias and is proud of the fact
that it provides its customers with the latest
products from the very best brands.
The Group also operates on-line businesses for
these retail fascias, providing the Group with a
truly multichannel, international platform.
JD is acknowledged as the leading specialist
multiple retailer of fashionable branded and own
brand sports and casual wear in the UK and
Republic of Ireland, combining globally recognised
brands such as Nike and Adidas with strong own
brand labels such as Mckenzie, Carbrini and The
Duffer of St George. JD has also now been
introduced to the European market with the
opening of our first 3 stores in France.
Size? was originally established to trial edgier
brands and footwear styles before introducing
them to the mass market through the JD fascia.
Size? is positioned as an ‘independent’ retailer
with each store having its own feel and loyal
catchment. Size? has recently celebrated its
10th birthday.
Scotts targets an older, more affluent male
consumer with brands such as Duck & Cover,
Henri Lloyd, Firetrap and Penguin, amongst others.
The Group also has a number of businesses
which design and distribute teamwear and
fashion product.
Canterbury was initially established in the New
Zealand province of Canterbury in 1904 to
manufacture and supply rugby jerseys. Backed
by over a century of rigorous on field testing,
Canterbury is one of the world’s largest rugby
brands. Canterbury will be providing the kit to
4 teams at the 2011 Rugby World Cup.
Kooga design, source and wholesale rugby
apparel and equipment, with teamwear, replica
and leisurewear ranges. Kooga is also sole kit
supplier to a number of professional rugby union
and rugby league clubs.
Kukri, acquired in February 2011, sources and
provides bespoke sports teamwear to schools,
universities and sports clubs. Teams design and
order their personalised kit on-line, with over 75
different sports catered for. In addition, Kukri
Sports Limited is sole kit supplier to a number
of professional sports teams.
Nicholas Deakins designs and manufactures
predominantly men’s footwear and clothing. Since
its inception in 1991, the brand has been moulded
into several collections with labels including
Nicholas Deakins Green Label clothing and
footwear, Deakins and Deakins kids.
Bank is aimed at the young male and female,
branded fashion-conscious consumer, selling fast
fashion brands such as Superdry, Paul’s Boutique,
Lipsy and Jack & Jones, as well as own brands
such as Ribbon and Rivington. The Bank fascia
continues to expand throughout the UK and will
open its first store in Northern Ireland in April 2011.
Focus are involved in the design, sourcing and
distribution of footwear and apparel both for own
brand and under license brands, such as Ecko,
Ellesse, Kickers and Le Coq Sportif, for both
group and external customers.
Chausport was acquired in May 2009 and sells
a strong range of international brands such as
Nike, Adidas and Le Coq Sportif together with
brands more specific to the French market such
as Redskins.
Champion was acquired in April 2011 and is one of
the leading retailers of sports apparel and footwear
in the Republic of Ireland with 22 stores in premium
locations in town centres and shopping centres. In
addition, it also has one store in Northern Ireland.
Getthelabel.com is an on-line and catalogue
business which offers customers significant
savings on branded fashion and footwear.
The Group
at a Glance
8
Devlin wearing The Duffer of St George rugby shirt
and Adidas PT footwear, both exclusive to JD
9
“The year ended
29 January
2011 has been
the seventh
successive
year of good
progress in
revenue and
profitability for
the Group”
10
Mckenzie Denim polo, exclusive to JD
11
12
Stolen Palazzo pant and
Ribbon denim gilet, both exclusive to Bank
Executive
Chairman’s
Statement
Introduction
The year ended 29 January 2011 has been the seventh successive year of
good progress in revenue and profitability for the Group. Profit before tax and
exceptional items improved by 21% to £81.6 million (2010: £67.4 million).
Such sustained performance continues to reflect the strength and uniqueness
of our brand and fascia offers as well as the strength of our management
teams. Our very strong cash position has also allowed us to continue to invest
in brands, our store portfolios and new businesses during the year and since
the year end.
Group profit before tax increased by 28% in the year to £78.6 million
(2010: £61.4 million) and Group profit after tax has increased by 31% to
£55.9 million (2010: £42.7 million).
Group operating profit (before exceptional items) for the year was up 19%
to £79.9 million (2010: £67.3 million) and comprises a Sports Fascias profit
of £73.3 million (2010: £64.1 million), a Fashion Fascias profit of £6.4 million
(2010: £3.3 million) and a Distribution segment profit of £0.2 million
(2010: loss of £0.1 million).
The year end net cash position has risen to £86.1 million (2010: £60.5 million).
The Group has recently negotiated terms on new committed rolling credit
and working capital facilities totalling £75 million. These new facilities expire
in October 2015 and when combined with our cash resources give the Group
the funding capability to continue to develop operationally and by acquisition
both in the United Kingdom and overseas. Confidence arising from the sustained
period of results improvement and the strength of our balance sheet has enabled
the Board to propose another significant increase in the level of dividends with
a final proposed dividend increase of 31% to 19.2p (2010: 14.7p) bringing the
total dividends payable for the year to 23.0p (2010: 18.0p), an increase of 28%
following on from the rises of 50% and 41% in the last two years.
Acquisitions
The Sports and Fashion retail offers continue to provide consumers with a
unique mix of sports and fashion brands in both apparel and footwear including
a substantial range of exclusive products as well as exclusive licensed and
own brands such as Mckenzie and Carbrini. We have continued to invest in
increasing the own brand offers through the acquisition of the Sonneti, Chilli
Pepper and Nanny State brands for a total consideration of £2.1 million. Since
the year end we have continued this strategy by acquiring the Fenchurch
brand for £1.1 million.
The strength of the JD offering gives potential for further replication
internationally, albeit in Europe initially. We see this as a key opportunity
wherever brands recognise our strength in developing brands and maintaining
their prestige. We started to exploit this opportunity when we acquired the
French retailer Chausport in May 2009. The first full year since the acquisition
contributed £36.4 million of revenue and £0.5 million of operating profit.
Like for like sales grew by 12.5% in the year and gross margin improved by
2.7% but overheads increased to support the opening of three JD stores in
France which opened late in the year. These latter stores are performing to
expectations so far.
We are looking at potential acquisitions and joint ventures in other territories
on a regular basis and we have no doubt that the Chausport acquisition has
enhanced our visibility and credibility as an overseas investor. Since the year
end we have acquired a further Sports Fascia chain in the Republic of Ireland,
Champion Sports (Holdings) (‘Champion’), for a nominal amount and have
also advanced €17.1 million to allow it to settle all of its indebtedness save
for €2.5 million of leasing finance. This has added 22 stores to the 8 already
operated in the Republic of Ireland and gives us a significant market position
throughout the whole of Ireland. It also gives us more local knowledge and a
strong management team on the ground.
After the year end we also acquired 80% of Kukri Sports Limited which
provides a bespoke teamwear offering across a wide range of sports in a
number of countries.
13
Sports Fascias
The Sports Fascias’ total revenue increased by 8% during the period to £667.2
million (2010: £615.5 million) with like for like sales for the year up by a further
3.8% (2010: 2.3%).
Gross margin achieved in the Sports Fascias increased from 50.6% to 51.0%
which we attribute to the continued improvement in the terminal stock position
in JD plus the impact from the extension of enhanced Group supplier terms
into the Chausport business.
As a result of this improved margin and continuing enhancement of the store
portfolio and its efficiencies, the operating profit (before exceptional items)
of the Sports Fascias rose to £73.3 million (2010: £64.1 million) in the year,
including a contribution of £0.5 million from Chausport (2010: £0.7 million).
The contribution from Chausport is lower than the previous year due to
the seasonal losses incurred in the early part of the year which were pre-
acquisition in the prior year.
The programme of store development has continued with 28 store openings
and 24 refurbishments or conversions. These include the opening of our first 3
JD stores in France (of which 1 was a conversion of a former Chausport store
in Lille), 5 new Chausport stores, 2 new Size? stores and 3 new JD stores in
airport locations. We have also opened a JD store at one of the UK’s busiest
train stations (Liverpool Street) which is our first store in this type of location
and, if successful, could be replicated in other major stations. 21 Sports
Fascias stores were closed in the period including 6 smaller Chausport stores.
Fashion Fascias
The Fashion Fascias are Bank and Scotts.
The Bank Fascia stores sell largely branded fashion to both males and
females, predominantly for the teenage to mid twenties sector. In the year
the store portfolio grew from 65 stores to 74 stores, still based predominantly
in the North and the Midlands. Total revenue in the year was £102.4 million
(2010: £82.8 million). This represents an organic decrease of 0.9% (2010:
+4.7%) although this decrease came from trading in the first half of the year
when the organic performance was measured against heavy clearance from
the prior year. This reduction in clearance activity is reflected in the fact that
gross margin achieved improved by a further 0.5% to 48.9% (2010: 48.4%)
after an increase of 2.3% in the prior year. Operating profit (before exceptional
items) was £5.2 million (2010: £3.0 million). The Board remains confident
that there is a significant opportunity to grow operating margin in this Fascia
through better stock management, own brand development and disciplined
store rollout although this will be challenging in 2011 as a result of VAT, cotton
and other fibre price increases and changes in brand distribution policy.
The Scotts Fascia stores sell branded fashion to older more affluent males and
there were 37 stores at the year end, largely in the North and the Midlands.
Total revenue in the year was £31.7 million (2010: £31.8 million) which was
flat organically. However, the balance of trading towards full price full margin
improved significantly driving an increase in the gross margin achieved to
49.5% (2010: 47.4%). This has led to an improved operating result with
operating profit (before exceptional items) of £1.2 million (2010: £0.3 million).
Distribution
The Distribution businesses delivered a small operating profit of £0.2 million
(2010: loss of £0.1 million) with a profit from Canterbury offset by ongoing
investment to build Getthelabel.com within Topgrade, and by losses incurred
in Kooga’s quietest trading period of the year, much of which fell prior to its
acquisition last year.
Canterbury delivered an operating profit of £1.1 million (2010: £0.1 million) on
total revenues of £48.3 million (2010: £15.4 million) with a strong performance
in both Australia and New Zealand where the brand was more sheltered from
the events that led to the administration of the former UK based Canterbury
business in 2009. The brand is still rebuilding its global network and it is hoped
that longer term gains will come from the new licences in South Africa and
Argentina, and the launch of a UK based business (in which we are the 75%
majority shareholder) focusing on developing a more fashion based product
offer to leverage the brand’s image and credibility. Canterbury will be providing
the kit for 4 teams at the forthcoming Rugby World Cup and the Board are
confident that this global exposure will enhance the reputation and penetration
of the Brand.
The Getthelabel.com on-line and catalogue business within Topgrade has now
been trading for over a year. Its sales progress is encouraging and on schedule
but the marketing and other investment required to achieve this means that
we believe it could take a further two years before it has sufficient critical
mass to deliver profits to the Group. This is not unusual in such businesses
and we remain optimistic about the long term profitability of this venture. As
a consequence of this, sales rose to £26.6 million (2010: £19.7 million) but
losses rose to £0.8 million (2010: £0.4 million) in the year. This was in line with
our expectations and we subsequently increased our stake in Topgrade from
51% to 80% during the year at a cost of £1.2 million.
Kooga Rugby went through a difficult period under its previous ownership and
a lot of effort has been focused on improving control over the commerciality
of the sponsorship properties and the profitability of product ranges and
accounts. An operating loss of £0.3 million was recorded for the year (2010:
profit of £0.2 million for the post-acquisition period) on sales of £6.5 million
(2010: £5.0 million). We have strengthened the management team which we
believe will lead to improvements in operating performance in due course.
Nicholas Deakins recorded a profit of £0.2 million (2010: £0.0 million) on
turnover of £3.4 million (2010: £2.5 million) in the year.
Joint Venture
Focus Brands Limited is involved in the design, sourcing and distribution of
footwear and apparel both for own brand and under license brands for both
group and external customers. Our share of operating results for the year was
an operating profit before exceptional items and after tax of £1.5 million
(2010: £0.5 million).
The exceptional items in the current year relate to unrealised gains on foreign
exchange contracts and the reversal of the impairment of the investment
held by Focus Brands Limited in Focus Group Holdings Limited, following
repayment of original purchase consideration by the vendors of Focus Group
Holdings Limited. The exceptional items in the prior year relate entirely to
unrealised losses on foreign exchange contracts.
After the year end we increased our holding in this business to 80% at an
initial cost of £1.0 million with potential further deferred consideration of
£250,000 depending on performance. The performance of this business will be
included in the Distribution segment in future.
Group Performance
Revenue
Total revenue increased by 14.8% in the year to £883.7 million (2010: £769.8
million) principally as a result of three factors: the Group’s positive like for like
sales performance of 3.1%, a net increase of 15 stores and £41.5 million of
sales from the pre acquisition period of the Chausport, Canterbury and Kooga
businesses.
Gross margin
Gross margin achieved increased in all segments. However, an increase in
the participation of the lower margin distribution businesses within the Group’s
overall performance from 5.4% to 9.5% means that the growth in overall Group
gross margin was limited to 0.2%.
Operating profits
Operating profit (before exceptional items) increased by £12.6 million to £79.9
million (2010: £67.3 million), a 19% increase on last year which follows a 24%
rise in the previous year. Group operating margin (before exceptional items)
has therefore increased by a further 0.3% to 9.0% (2010: 8.7%).
Following a decrease in the exceptional items to £4.3 million (2010: £5.0
million), Group operating profit rose from £62.3 million to £75.6 million.
The exceptional items (excluding share of exceptional items in joint venture)
comprise:
Impairment of investment property
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
Onerous lease provision
Total exceptional charge
£m
1.0
1.5
1.8
4.3
The impairment of investment property relates to a writedown in the valuation
of the St Albans warehouse occupied by Focus.
The loss on disposal includes both closed stores and assets written off in
refurbished stores.
The charge for onerous lease provisions includes £1.1 million for non-trading
stores and £0.7 million for trading stores.
Working Capital and Financing
As a consequence of having net cash throughout the year, the Group has net
financing income of £0.2 million compared to net financing costs in the prior
year of £0.4 million.
Year end net cash of £86.1 million represented a £25.6 million improvement on
the position at January 2010 (£60.5 million).
14
Net capital expenditure including disposal costs and premia received increased
in the year to £32.4 million (2010: £23.0 million) with capital expenditure
excluding disposal costs increasing by £10.1 million to £33.0 million (2010:
£22.9 million). This increase was focused on the core Sports Fascias where
the spend increased by £10.7 million to £25.6 million which included an
additional £3.9 million in the French business combined with £3.9 million
of spend connected with the new 866,250 sq ft warehouse (616,250 sq ft
footprint) at Kingsway, Rochdale. The Board anticipate that approximately
£15 million will be incurred in the year to 28 January 2012 on fitting out of the
warehouse. The demonstrable success of investing in the store portfolio means
that we anticipate maintaining spend on the stores at the current level.
Spend in the Fashion fascias decreased slightly by £0.7 million to £6.7 million.
This decrease does not mean that the Group is reducing its investment in the
Fashion fascias and is more a function of availability of appropriate property
and the timing of the projects.
Working capital remains well controlled with suppliers continuing to be paid to
agreed terms and settlement discounts taken whenever due.
Store Portfolio
We have made a further significant investment in the store portfolio during the
year with expenditure on both new stores and refurbishments of existing space.
We have also continued to rationalise our store portfolio wherever possible
but, with the current economic climate impacting heavily on retail property
occupancy levels, it remains very difficult to dispose of underperforming and/or
duplicate stores.
There was a net increase of 6 stores in the UK and Republic of Ireland JD and
Size? portfolios with 21 new stores offset by 15 closures. Our overall presence
has increased in France by 1 store with 7 new stores (including 2 JD stores
in Paris and Lyon) offset by the closure of 6 smaller Chausport stores. In
addition, one Chausport store has been converted to the JD ‘King of Trainers’
format in Lille and the success of that trial means that we will convert a further
2 Chausport stores (in Angers and Amiens) to this format in the current period.
There was a net addition of 9 stores in the Bank fascia with 13 store openings
offset by the closure of 4 stores. A loss making duplicate Scotts store in
Chester was also closed in the period.
We have refurbished a total of 29 stores in the year (including 3 stores where
space has been transferred between fascias). This means that over the last
four years we have opened a total of 108 stores and refurbished a further
123 stores.
During the year, store numbers (excluding trading websites) moved as follows:
Sports Fascias
Start of year
New stores
Transfers (1)
Closures
Remeasures
Close of year
JD and Size?
(UK and Republic of Ireland)
JD
(France)
Chausport
Total
Units
345
21
-
(15)
-
351
000 sq ft
1,100
65
(1)
(35)
2
1,131
Units
000 sq ft
Units
000 sq ft
-
2
1
-
-
3
-
4
1
-
-
5
75
5
(1)
(6)
-
73
78
10
(1)
(6)
(2)
79
(1) One JD store (Cardiff) was transferred to Bank in the period offset by the transfer of one store from Bank to JD (Sutton Coldfield).
One former Chausport store (Lille) was converted into a JD store.
Fashion Fascias
Start of year
New stores
Transfers
Closures
Remeasures
Close of year
Bank
Units
000 sq ft
65
13
-
(4)
-
74
176
42
1
(9)
-
210
Scotts
000 sq ft
85
-
-
(6)
(3)
76
Units
38
-
-
(1)
-
37
Units
420
28
-
(21)
-
427
Units
103
13
-
(5)
-
111
000 sq ft
1,178
79
(1)
(41)
-
1,215
Total
000 sq ft
261
42
1
(15)
(3)
286
15
Dividends and Earnings per Share
The Board proposes paying a final dividend of 19.20p (2010: 14.70p) bringing the
total dividend payable for the year to 23.00p (2010: 18.00p) per ordinary share.
The proposed final dividend will be paid on 1 August 2011 to all shareholders
on the register at 6 May 2011. The final dividend has been increased by 31%
with total dividends payable for the year increased by 28%. This follows a 50%
increase in the full year dividend in the prior year.
The adjusted earnings per ordinary share before exceptional items were 116.86p
(2010: 93.64p).
The basic earnings per ordinary share were 114.84p (2010: 88.16p).
Employees
As ever, after another record year, it is right to give credit and thanks to all our
employees around the world for delivering such exceptional results. We remain
committed to continuing to develop their skills and prospects through our
success, training and quality of operation.
Current Trading and Outlook
Following successive years of record results for the Group, the retail environment
has recently been significantly impacted by adverse fiscal changes in addition
to the multiple current economic pressures. Specifically, the increase in VAT for
the year to 28 January 2012 means that the same level of gross takings will
produce a contribution of approximately £16 million less than the previous year.
Simultaneously, but quite separately, we anticipate a reduction of real expenditure
levels by consumers at a time when product costs, particularly imported goods,
are increasing at a material rate.
Trading for the early part of the current financial year has been difficult to gauge
when Easter falls three weeks later than last year. For the 8 weeks to 26 March
2011 gross like for like sales (including e-commerce) were +0.4% whilst net sales
have declined 1.2% (Sports Fascias -1.4%, Fashion Fascias +0.0%). The decline
in net sales and the resulting reduced margin are directly as a result of the fiscal
changes referred to above.
Our core business already possesses very strong sales densities and margins,
being the result of continual growth in both measures for several years. Against
that background, therefore, it is inevitable that the Board is extremely cautious in
its outlook, particularly when the profits achieved for the year to 29 January 2011
are effectively rebased purely as a result of the impact of increased VAT.
On the positive side the business delivers strong operating ratios and high levels
of free cash generation. It has a robust balance sheet with £86.1 million net cash
balances at the year end which leaves the Group well positioned to extend the
retail opportunities which may arise and to continue to pursue a progressive
dividend policy.
Management remain highly focused on all avenues of revenue growth, margin
protection and cost control available to us to endeavour to deliver the optimum
outturn, minimise the impact of the factors above and, with a strong balance
sheet and dominant market position in our core business, we expect to be able
to deliver operational and financial progress for the Group over the long term.
Opportunities for profit growth overseas and development of our differentiated
and own brand proposition, combined with prospects for growth in our Distribution
business, all help to reduce the current threats to long term Group profitability and
give us the opportunity to maintain positive long term momentum in our business.
A further update will be made in our Interim Management Statement no later than
17 June 2011.
Peter Cowgill
Executive Chairman
13 April 2011
16
Nicholas Deakins Guvnor jacket,
available at Scotts
17
18
Fred Perry shirt and jacket,
available at Scotts
Financial
and Risk
Review
Introduction
Treasury Facilities
The £70 million bank syndicated facility which
was agreed in October 2006 was due to expire in
October 2011. This facility included a £60 million
revolving credit facility. Its availability provided the
Group with the funds to make major investments
should the appropriate opportunity have arisen.
The Board are keen to maintain this ability to move
quickly and so a new syndicated facility has been
agreed. This facility is for £75 million over 54 months
to October 2015. The £60 million revolving credit
facility has been maintained but the working capital
facility has been increased to £15 million. The Board
believe that this mix of facility is appropriate as the
cash flows are still cyclical in nature, particularly
around the trading peak at Christmas, although we
continue to try and remove the quarterly peaks from
the store rent payments by negotiating monthly rent
payments wherever possible at no additional cost.
The terms of this facility are disclosed in note 35 to
the accounts. The previous facility was negotiated
in 2006 when margins on bank facilities were
at a different level. Accordingly, the margin that
will be payable on the new facility has increased
from 0.75% to 1.25%. This new rate is in the
lower quartile of margins that are being agreed
on bank facilities at the current time. Significant
improvements in other areas of the new facility
pertaining to the Group’s ability to make investment
decisions have been obtained during the negotiation
process. The Board therefore believes that the new
facility enables the Group to make quick decisions
on significant investments, whilst giving increased
flexibility in the shorter term working capital cycle.
Interest rate hedging has not been put in place on
the new facility. The Directors continue to be
mindful of the potential volatility in base rates, but
at present do not consider a long term interest rate
hedge to be necessary given that the facility is not
used during substantial periods of the year.
This position is reviewed regularly, along with
the level of facility required.
The Group’s principal foreign exchange exposure
continues to be on the sourcing of own brand
merchandise from the Far East which usually has
to be paid for in US Dollars. A buying rate is set at
the start of the buying season (typically six to nine
months before product is received). At this point,
the Group aims to protect the anticipated US Dollar
requirement at rates at, or above, the buying rate
through appropriate foreign exchange instruments.
The Group’s forecast requirement for US Dollars
in the period to January 2012 is $86 million. Cover
is now in place for 2011 for $83 million meaning
that the Group is currently exposed on exchange
rate movements for $3 million of the current year’s
estimated requirement. The anticipated requirement
for the period to January 2013 is $95 million with
$10 million of cover in place at the current time.
Profit before tax increased by £17.2 million to
£78.6 million in the year. This improvement
was achieved through:
• Sales growth, both organic and from net new
space opened, in both the Sports and Fashion
Retail Fascias
• Improvement in gross margin achieved in all
segments
• Improved net cash position leading to net interest
received rather than paid
Taxation
The effective rate of tax on profit has decreased
by 1.5% to 28.9% primarily due to a decrease
in non-qualifying impairments within exceptional
items, combined with the utilisation of previously
unrecognised deferred tax assets.
Excluding both exceptional items and prior year
adjustments, the effective core tax rate has
decreased from 30.2% to 28.9%. This core effective
tax rate continues to be above the standard rate
due to the depreciation of non-current assets and
the incurrence of professional fees on corporate
transactions, both of which do not qualify for any
form of tax relief.
Earnings per Share
The basic earnings per share has increased by
30% from 88.16p to 114.84p. However, the Directors
consider the adjusted earnings per share to be a
more appropriate measure of the Group’s earnings
performance since it excludes the post-tax effect of
exceptional items (other than the loss on disposal
of non-current assets). The adjusted earnings per
share increased by 25% from 93.64p to 116.86p.
Dividends
A final cash dividend of 19.20p per share is
proposed which, if approved, would represent an
increase of 31% on the final dividend from the prior
year. Added to the interim dividend of 3.80p per
share, this takes the full year dividend to 23.00p,
which is an increase of 28% on the prior year.
The full year dividend has therefore grown by 92%
in 2 years. The dividend is covered 5.0 times by
basic earnings per share and 5.1 times by the
adjusted earnings per share.
Net Cash
The year end net cash position has increased by
£25.6 million to £86.1 million. Net capital
expenditure including disposal costs and premia
received increased in the year by £9.4 million to
£32.4 million with a further £9.6 million spent on the
acquisition of intangible assets (brands and
licences) in the year. In spite of the heavy level of
capital expenditure, the continued improvement in
the net cash position has enabled the Group to
deliver a further substantial enhancement in the
dividends to shareholders. The strong net cash
position also means that we are likely to fund the
approximately £20 million fit out of the new 866,250
sq ft (616,250 sq ft footprint) warehouse in
Rochdale from available cash. This expenditure on
the warehouse will not affect the investment that we
are making in the store portfolio, both in terms of
taking on new space and refurbishing existing
space, as this spend continues to drive improved
returns from the core retail businesses.
The net cash position has continued to benefit from
improved merchandising controls over stocks in the
retail fascias. Trade creditors continue to be paid
to terms to maximise settlement discounts with the
period end creditor days being 33 (2010: 36).
19
20
Chausport, Houdemont, Nancy, France
Intellectual property
The Group’s trademarks, patents designs and other
intellectual property rights are critical in maintaining
the value of the Group’s own brands and ensuring
that the Group’s businesses can use these
brands exclusively is critical in providing a point
of differentiation to their customers. The Group
therefore works with third party organisations to
ensure that the Group’s intellectual property is
registered in all relevant territories. The Group also
actively works to prevent counterfeit product being
passed off as legitimate.
Personnel
The success of the Group is partly dependent
upon the continued service of its key management
personnel and upon its ability to attract, motivate
and retain suitably qualified employees. To help
achieve this continued service, the Group has
competitive reward packages for all of its staff.
More specifically for the retail businesses, the
Group also has a long established and substantial
training function which seeks to develop training
for all levels of retail employees and thereby
increase morale and improve staff retention.
This then ensures that knowledge of the Group’s
differentiated product offering is not lost, thereby
enhancing customer service.
Treasury
Whilst the Group does not have any borrowings
from its core syndicated facility currently, any
borrowings that will be made are at variable rates
linked to LIBOR. Further details of the Group’s
interest rate risk are provided in note 24 on page 88.
The Group operates internationally and is exposed
to foreign exchange risk arising from various
currency exposures but primarily with respect to the
US dollar. As described earlier, this risk is managed
through the use of appropriate foreign currency
contracts. Further information is also provided in
note 24 on page 88.
Brian Small
Group Finance Director
13 April 2011
IT
The Group relies on its IT systems and networks
and those of the banks and the credit card companies
to service its retail customers all year round.
The principal legacy enterprise system is ideally
suited to the operations of the business but it is
heavily reliant on a very limited number of key
development staff. This risk is being mitigated
by improving documentation of the system and
increasing the development team. At some time
in the future the risk could be further mitigated by
moving to third party enterprise systems but not
without additional risk and significant additional cost.
Any long term interruption in the availability of the
core enterprise system would have a significant
impact on the retail businesses. The Group
manages this risk by the principal IT servers being
housed in a third party location which has a mirror
back up available should the primary servers or
links fail.
Distribution Specific
Credit risk
The distribution businesses could have a credit
risk if credit evaluations were not performed on all
customers requiring credit over a certain amount.
If the credit report presents an adverse picture the
management of the business concerned take a
commercial decision as to whether credit should
be given. All customers are monitored closely with
outstanding amounts chased rigorously and future
supplies stopped where necessary. Provisions are
made for customer debts where there is a probable
risk of non-payment.
All Businesses
Economic factors
As with other retailers and distributors into retail
businesses, the demand for the Group’s products
is influenced by a number of economic factors,
notably interest rates, the availability of consumer
credit, employment levels and ultimately, disposable
incomes. This is particularly relevant at the current
time, where there are significant cutbacks within
national and local government and so many
consumers have had to cut back on non-essential
spending. The Group seeks to manage this risk by
offering a highly desirable and competitively priced
product range, which is differentiated to that of the
Group’s competitors.
Reliance on non-UK manufacturers
The majority of both third party branded product
and the Group’s own branded product is sourced
outside of the UK. The Group is therefore exposed
to the risks associated with international trade and
transport as well as different legal systems and
operating standards. Whilst the Group can manage
the risk in the supply chain on its own and licensed
products, it has little control over the supply chain
within the third party brands. As such, the Group is
exposed to events which may not be under its control.
The Group works with its suppliers to ensure that
the products being sourced satisfy increasingly
stringent laws and regulations governing issues
of health and safety, packaging and labelling and
other social and environmental factors.
Risk Factors
Any business undertaking will involve some risk
with many risk factors common to any business no
matter what segment it operates in. The Directors
acknowledge however that certain risks and
uncertainties are more specific to the Group and
the markets in which its businesses operate. The
principal risk factors are assessed below:
Retail Specific
Brands
The retail fascias sell a mixture of third party and
own brand product (includes exclusive licences).
Therefore, it is heavily dependent on these brands
being desirable to the customer. The Group needs
all of its third party and own brands to maintain
their design and marketing prominence. The Group
also seeks to ensure it is not overly reliant on a
small number of brands by offering a stable of
brands which is constantly evolving. This includes
actively seeking additional brands which it can
either own or license exclusively.
Retail property factors
The retail landscape has seen significant changes
in recent years with a number of new developments
opened and a high volume of retail units becoming
vacant. The Group can be exposed where it has
committed itself to a long lease in a location which,
as a result of a more recent retail development, is
no longer as attractive to the customer so suffers
from reduced footfall. Wherever possible, the Group
will seek either to take out new leases for a period
not exceeding 10 years or to negotiate lease
breaks, thereby limiting this potential exposure and
affording the Group increased flexibility to respond
to such changes.
When the Group determines that the store
performance is unsatisfactory it approaches the
landlords to agree a surrender of the lease. Where
this is not possible, the Group would seek to
assign the lease or sublet it to another retailer. In
many cases, this necessitates the payment of an
incentive to the other retailer. The Group is mindful
of current economic factors and the adverse impact
on the potential for disposal from the high volume
of vacant units already available as a consequence
of a number of retailers going out of business in
recent years.
However, assigning the lease or finding a sub-
tenant is not without risk because if the other
retailer fails then the liability to pay the rent usually
reverts to the head lessee. The Group monitors
the financial condition of the assignees closely for
evidence that the possibility of a store returning is
more that remote and makes a provision for the
return of stores if this risk becomes probable. The
Board reviewed the list of assigned leases as at 29
January 2011 and does not feel that there are any
situations where the risk of the lease returning is
either more than remote or probable.
Warehouse operations
Warehousing operations in the UK are currently
split across two main sites. The Group has now
taken possession of the new warehouse in
Rochdale and whilst the consolidation of activity
and increased automation within the picking
process will bring significant operational and cost
benefits, there is an increased risk from both
equipment and system failure, together with the
inherent risk of having all the stock in one location.
The Group is working with its insurers on a robust
Business Continuity Plan which will come into
effect once the new warehouse becomes
operational in mid 2012.
The Group is also working on a robust change
management plan to ensure that there is no
interruption to supply to stores during the transition
phase from the current warehouses to the new facility.
Seasonality
The Group’s core retail business is highly seasonal.
Historically, the Group’s most important trading
period in terms of sales, profitability and cash flow
has been the Christmas season. Lower than expected
performance in this period may have an adverse
impact on results for the full year, which may cause
excess inventories that are difficult to liquidate.
21
“Profit before
tax and
exceptional
items improved
by 21% to
£81.6 million”
Pure Simple Sport hoody and leggings, both exclusive to JD
23
24
25
Property and
Stores Review
UK and Republic of Ireland
We continue to invest significantly in the store
portfolio both in terms of new stores and major
refurbishments of existing space. 34 new stores
opened in the period (21 Sports Fascias stores
and 13 Fashion Fascias stores) and 18 major
refurbishments were carried out and a further 2
stores were refitted following a transfer between
fascias. This means that over the last three
years we have opened a total of 88 stores and
refurbished a further 83 stores. As a consequence,
approximately 37% of the UK and Republic of
Ireland store portfolio as at 29 January 2011 has
a store fit which is less than three years old. We
maintain our belief that the modern and fashionable
environment which we provide in our stores is
of essential appeal to our customers and that
maintenance of the spend at current levels will have
a positive impact on future financial performance.
The 21 new Sports Fascias stores included 12
stores in new locations (including 2 Size? stores)
with the remaining 9 being replacement of existing
space. Included within the new stores are 3 new
stores at airport locations. We have also opened a
JD store at one of the UK’s busiest train stations
(Liverpool Street) which is our first store in this type
of location and, if successful, could be replicated
in other major stations or transport hubs. We have
opened 3 new Sports Fascias stores in the UK and
Republic of Ireland to date in the current period
and anticipate that we will open approximately
17 stores over the full year of which 3 will be
replacements of existing space. We anticipate that
we will close approximately 10 Sports Fascias
stores during the period including the 3 to be
closed for replacements, of which 2 are smaller
stores currently planned for conversion to the
Scotts fascia.
The 13 new Fashion Fascias stores were all
new Bank stores with 3 of the stores being
replacements of existing space including the
opening of a new 5,300 sq ft store in the Trafford
Centre which is 2,600 sq ft larger than the old
store. The old store in the Trafford Centre was
typical of the stores which we inherited when we
acquired the business in December 2007. However,
we believe that stores of this size are too small
to present a full product offer to both a male and
female consumer and so the emphasis for the store
openings in the current year will be on larger space
in prime locations with strong footfall in the fascia’s
heartlands in the Midlands, North of England and
Scotland. These planned openings also include
a store in Belfast which would represent Bank’s
first store in Ireland. We maintain our belief that
the store model and product offer from Bank can
support a portfolio across the UK and Republic
of Ireland in excess of 100 stores. However, we
do not feel yet that we have a product and brand
proposition that we can roll out in significant
numbers across the South of England and it is
this product development together with improving
the margin which will ultimately drive enhanced
future performance from this fascia. We currently
plan to open 10 new Bank stores in the current
period of which one has already opened to date.
No new Scotts stores opened in the period but we
do currently plan to open 3 new Scotts stores in the
coming year including the conversions of 2 former
JD stores.
The 18 major refurbishments included extensive
refits of the JD stores in Bullring, Uxbridge,
Cheshunt and Bolton Middlebrook.
26
The performance from stores which have been
refurbished continues to be pleasing with sales
growth exceeding the average growth across
all stores by more than 10%. This performance
justifies continued significant investment in
refurbishments and so it is likely that we will refit
a similar number of stores in the current year.
Refurbishments planned for the current year
include extensions in 3 JD stores where we will
take additional space to enable us to offer an
enhanced product and brand offer.
We have also continued to rationalise our store
portfolio but, with the current economic climate
impacting heavily on retail property occupancy
levels, it remains very difficult to dispose of stores,
unless leases have ended or contain a break
facility. We have, however, closed a further 20
underperforming and/or duplicate stores during
the year (15 Sports Fascias stores and 5 Fashion
Fascias stores). 3 JD stores have closed to date in
the current period.
France
In May 2009 we acquired Chausport SA who are
primarily a retailer of sports footwear in France.
This strategic acquisition gave the Group the
opportunity for future growth by entering a new and
sizeable European market outside of its established
base in the UK and Republic of Ireland.
7 new stores have opened in the period (5
Chausport and 2 JD) and 8 refurbishments
have been completed. In addition we have also
converted the former Chausport store in Lille to a
JD Fascia. The 5 new Chausport stores opened
included 4 replacements of existing space and 1
store in a new location.
Sports Fascias
JD – UK and Republic of Ireland
JD – France
Chausport
Size
First Sport
Nike (i)
Other Fascias
Total
(i) Store subsequently closed in current period.
Fashion Fascias
Bank
Scotts
Total
Group Total
The initial performance of the JD fascia stores
has been pleasing with the converted store in
Lille currently performing over 100% ahead of the
historical performance after 17 full trading weeks.
This performance has given us the confidence
to extend the trial and so we will convert 2 other
Chausport stores to the JD fascia in the current
year. In addition, we would also like to open at least
2 other JD stores in major conurbations and malls
in France, subject to locating suitable sites. Whilst
identifying suitable sites for JD in France is critical,
the performance of the JD business will also be
heavily influenced by optimising the brand and
product mix and tailoring this to the local market
where appropriate.
Chausport has historically not been well
represented in the major conurbations, as the
business has often been unable to pay the high
level of key money which is necessary to secure
access to these locations. The future strategy for
France will involve continuing to trial the JD fascia
in a number of major cities and shopping malls
where we will not self compete, whilst maintaining
the Chausport fascia in the smaller regional towns
and shopping centres where it is well established.
In the current year we also intend to open
approximately 2 new Chausport stores in France
and refurbish/relocate a similar number. These
stores will be fitted out using a store design
which the management team have developed
internally over the last 3 years. The performance
of stores fitted out using this design continues to
be promising and so the management team are
confident that it is right to roll this fit out in future
Chausport stores.
As with the UK and Republic of Ireland portfolio,
stores will be closed where necessary. We have
closed 6 Chausport stores during the year and
we currently anticipate that 2 stores will be closed
during the period, although one of these will relate
to the relocation of an old Chausport store into
larger space and a location with stronger footfall.
Store Portfolio
The store portfolio for the Group at 29 January
2011 and 30 January 2010 can be analysed
as follows:
No. Stores
000 sq ft
2011
2010
2011
2010
322
315
1,080
1,048
3
73
19
7
1
2
-
75
17
8
2
3
5
79
27
19
2
3
-
78
23
22
3
4
427
420
1,215
1,178
No. Stores
000 sq ft
2011
2010
2011
2010
74
37
65
38
111
103
210
76
286
176
85
261
538
523
1,501
1,439
27
28
King of Trainers,
a JD fascia, Lille, France,
opened 27 November 2010
“The year end net
cash position has
risen to £86.1 million”
29
Darfield Kiwi tee and Huntley check shirt,
Canterbury Spring/Summer 2011 range
30
Corporate and
Social Responsibility
The Group recognises that it has a responsibility to ensure its business
is carried out in a way that ensures high standards of environmental and
human behaviour. With the help and co-operation of all employees, the Group
endeavours to comply with all relevant laws in order to meet that duty and
responsibility wherever it operates. The major contributions of the Group in this
respect are detailed below.
RETAIL BUSINESSES
Employment
The Group is a large equal opportunities employer and a large training
organisation, with the Group’s retail businesses providing direct employment
and career development to thousands of people, primarily across the UK,
Republic of Ireland and France. The Group employs large numbers of school
leavers and university graduates and participates regularly in work experience
schemes with schools and colleges across both countries.
Training
The Group recognises that training for all levels of staff is vital to performance
and it also provides a mechanism for increasing morale and improving staff
retention. This ensures that knowledge of the Group’s differentiated product
offering is not lost, thereby enhancing customer service.
Retail staff at all levels in the Group’s core UK and Republic of Ireland retail
fascias are encouraged to seek development and progression ultimately up to
management level, with training provided by the Group’s long established and
substantial training function. Training is given in four main areas:
New management induction
Training academy for new
managers
Junior management
development
Management and
leadership workshops
No. of
courses in
a year
19
3
70
15
Length of
course
1 week
12 weeks
1 day
1 day
No. of
people on
each course
18
20
10
8
Chausport operate their own training programme. However, the managers
and assistant managers of the JD stores in France have their own bespoke
training programme organised by the UK training function which is designed to
ensure they operate their stores to standards consistent with JD in the UK and
Republic of Ireland.
Equal opportunities
The Group is committed to promoting policies which are designed to ensure
that employees and those who seek to work for the Group are treated equally
regardless of sex, marital status, sexual orientation, creed, colour, race or
ethnic origin.
The Group gives full and fair consideration to applications for employment
by people who are disabled, to continue whenever possible the development
of staff who become disabled and to provide equal opportunities for the
career development of disabled employees. It is also Group policy to provide
opportunities for the large number of people seeking flexible or part time hours.
Communication
The number and geographic dispersion of the Group’s operating locations
make it difficult, but essential, to communicate effectively with employees.
Communication with retail staff is primarily achieved through the management
in the regional and area operational structures. In addition, formal
communications informing all employees of the financial performance of
the Group are issued on a regular basis by the Group’s Human Resources
Department in the form of ‘Team Briefs’.
31
Stuart Fielden of Wigan Warriors
Rugby League Club and England,
wearing Kooga EVX shoulder pad
32
The Group is committed to using and subsequently reporting on appropriate
KPIs with regards to energy usage. Accordingly, the Group can report the
following in respect of locations in the UK and Republic of Ireland that
have been present for the full year for both years. As this is a like for like
comparison, the 2010 data has been updated to reflect store openings and
disposals in the current year:
2011
2010
%
Change
Energy Usage – Electricity (MWh)
46,242
47,555
Energy Usage – Natural Gas (MWh)
Total Energy Use (MWh)
Carbon Footprint (Tonnes CO2)
4,208
50,450
25,631
4,453
52,008
26,383
-3%
-6%
-3%
-3%
The Group has pledged to reduce its combined energy usage from these
levels by 3% year on year on a like for like basis until the end of the scheme.
This target and the associated operating standards that drive this target apply
to all the Group’s businesses.
The Group has again invested heavily in the period to 29 January 2011 in
replacing inefficient air conditioning systems. A further 26 stores now have
systems with market leading technologies which consume less energy whilst
providing an appropriate temperature for staff and visitors. This replacement
programme is ongoing and it is anticipated that a similar number of works will
be carried out in the period to 28 January 2012. Following the successful trial
of lower watt bulbs in stores, the Group has now adopted these bulbs across
all retail businesses reducing the electricity required for lighting by over 50%.
The Group is committed to investing in the necessary resources to help
achieve its targets on reducing carbon emissions, with the following works
planned for the year to 28 January 2012:
• Expanding the CMP to widen the awareness campaign, through better
training, improved communication and reporting
• Continuing the air conditioning replacement programme
• Increasing analysis and reporting of data provided by smart meters
• Expanding the use of building management systems in store to allow remote
monitoring and control
The Group is also aware of the need to purchase energy competitively from
renewable sources wherever possible. As a result, the Group has continued
with the Airtricity electricity supply contract in Northern Ireland and Republic
of Ireland, who source 100% of their electricity from renewable sources.
The Company has also agreed a contract with British Gas in the UK (except
Northern Ireland) to supply electricity from Good Quality Combined Heat
and Power (‘GQCHP’) sources. This means the UK and Republic of Ireland
businesses now get over 70% of all their electricity from sustainable sources.
Health and Safety
We are committed to ensuring a safe environment for all of our employees and
customers and actively encourage a positive health and safety culture
throughout the organisation. The Group recognises its responsibility for health
and safety and there is accountability from the Group Board and throughout
the various management levels within the business.
Our health and safety team have developed a comprehensive induction and
training programme which is regarded as an essential part of our commitment
to health and safety. Targeted safety awareness campaigns are run regularly
throughout the year and a monthly newsletter ensures that the safety message
is communicated effectively throughout the Group.
Our Health and Safety Committee meets regularly each year allowing
every employee the opportunity to raise any safety concerns through their
nominated representative.
To ensure that stores are designed and built with safety in mind, our health
and safety team has input into all our new and refitted stores from the initial
design through to opening. We conduct our own audit programme to ensure
the highest safety standards during the construction phase of all our
shop-fit projects.
We set targets to enable us to measure our performance. During the current
year we have seen positive improvements in the completion of internal health
and safety inspections and risk assessments, as a result of countrywide
presentations to the retail team, to increase awareness of our responsibilities.
Our health and safety team regularly review the management processes we
have in place, with the aim of maintaining our high standards, whilst adapting
to business and legislative changes.
Environment
The Group recognises the importance of protecting our environment for
future generations and is committed to carrying out its activities with due
consideration for the environmental impact of its operations particularly with
regards to:
• Ensuring efficient use of energy and other materials
• Minimising waste by recycling wherever possible
• Ensuring compliance with relevant legislation and codes of best practice
Energy
It is the Group’s aim to give customers an enjoyable retail experience with goods
presented in an environment that is both well lit and has a pleasant ambient
temperature. However, the Group accepts that all the businesses within it must
be responsible in their energy usage and associated carbon emissions.
To that end, the Group maintains a Carbon Management Programme (‘CMP’)
which aims to:
• Ensure there is an accurate baseline for consumption by working with
electricity suppliers to ensure that bills reflect actual usage
• Improve understanding of the drivers and timing of usage by investment in
‘smart’ electricity meters. This has been achieved in approximately 350 of the
Group’s stores. Combined with the stores where accurate and timely usage
data is already received, this means that in excess of 93% of the UK and
Republic of Ireland electricity consumption is automatically measured every
30 minutes. In addition to accurate billing for these stores, analysis of the
data has also shown that usage in non-trading periods is higher than would
be expected. The usage in these periods is being reduced through additional
training and investment in small scale building management systems
where appropriate
• Enhance staff awareness through training at store level, thereby ensuring
that retail staff understand that they have a key role in the CMP
• Pursue a multi-disciplined approach to the CMP to ensure all business
activities are aware of their impact on energy consumption
Under the current rules of the statutory Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy
Efficiency scheme (‘CRC’), the Group’s submission to the Environment Agency
will be aggregated with that of Pentland Group Plc who are the Group’s
ultimate holding company (see note 36). The Group is therefore working with
Pentland Group Plc on ensuring an efficient and effective transfer into the
new emissions trading scheme which was introduced in April 2010, as part of
the CRC. From an internal Group perspective, however, the Group Finance
Director will carry the responsibility for the entry and subsequent reporting on
targets in the first phase of the CRC, to 2013.
33
34
Ribbon maxi dress, exclusive to Bank,
Religion tee and Selected denim short,
also available at Bank
Environment (continued)
Recycling
Wherever possible, cardboard (the major packaging constituent) is taken back
to the Group’s distribution centres. The cardboard is then baled and passed to
recycling businesses for reprocessing. During the year, the Group increased its
recycling of cardboard to 423.3 tonnes (2010: 245.5 tonnes).
The Group is expanding its use of recycling opportunities wherever possible by
introducing a Dry Mixed Recycling (DMR) scheme to divert waste from landfill.
Recycling remains split into four main elements:
• The DMR scheme allows us to increase the recycling of cardboard, paper,
plastics and metal containers
• Confidential paper waste is shredded on collection by a recycling business
This business provides a ‘Certificate of Environmental Accomplishment’ which
states that the shredded paper, which was collected in the year, was the
equivalent of 1,211 trees (2010: 1,540 trees) with the reduction reflecting the
fact that some paper which was previously disposed of as confidential waste
to ensure it was recycled is now disposed of via the new DMR process
• Wood and metal waste is separated at our main distribution centres to further
reduce our waste to landfill liabilities
• Photocopier and printer toners (laser and ink) are collected and recycled for
charity by Environmental Business Products Limited
Plastic bags
Approximately 40% of the bags issued by the Group are high quality drawstring
duffle bags, which are generally reused by customers many times. However,
the Group is aware of the environmental impact of plastic bags and has sought
to minimise any impact through the following measures:
• The bags are made from 33% recycled material
ALL BUSINESSES
Ethical Sourcing
The Group seeks to provide its customers with high quality and value
merchandise from suppliers who can demonstrate compliance with
internationally accepted core labour and ethical standards throughout
their supply chain.
These standards are based upon the provisions of the Ethical Trading Initiative
(‘ETI’) Base Code and specifically cover areas such as wages, working hours,
health and safety and the right to freedom of association.
The Group requires all of its suppliers, both existing and new, to formally
commit to implementing the provisions of the ETI Base Code throughout their
supply chains. Prior to any orders being placed, all new suppliers are required
to complete the Group’s risk assessment form to indicate their degree of
compliance to the ETI Base Code. All existing suppliers are also required to
conduct this assessment on an annual basis. These forms are reviewed by the
Group’s Buying team members and Pentland Group’s Corporate and Social
Responsibility Manager and any areas of concern with regard to potential
non-compliance are investigated when visiting the factories concerned.
Due to the diverse nature and scope of the supply chain, it is not always
possible to visit all of the factories directly. Where instances of non-compliance
are identified from the risk assessment forms and the supplier cannot
be visited, they are required to confirm what corrective actions are being
undertaken to resolve the issue. These actions will be verified directly by the
Group’s Buying team members and Pentland Group’s Corporate and Social
Responsibility Manager as soon as practically possible on a future visit.
All suppliers are contractually obliged to comply with the Group’s
Conditions of Supply which includes a specific policy on ‘Employment
Standards for Suppliers’.
• The bags contain an oxo-biodegradable additive, which means that they
degrade totally over a relatively short life span
Community Engagement
In addition, the Group uses paper-based bags rather than plastic bags in its
stores in the Republic of Ireland.
The Group seeks to be involved in the community where it can make an
appropriate contribution from its resources and skills base. Examples of
this include:
• JD Sports Fashion Plc sponsorship of the City of Salford 10k run which took
place in September 2010
• Donations to The Geoff Thomas Foundation which works closely with
Leukaemia & Lymphoma Research on raising funds to speed up the delivery
of effective new treatments to patients with blood cancer
• Donations to The Marina Dalglish Appeal to improve cancer treatment
facilities in Liverpool
• Donations to Boot out Breast Cancer which raises funds to provide
equipment for as many breast cancer units in the North West as possible
• Donations to Cancer Research UK
• Donations to The Elizabeth Hardie Ferguson Charitable Trust Fund which
was founded by Sir Alex Ferguson and is dedicated to the memory of his
mother. The Trust acts as a fund raising body and distributes all proceeds to
deserving causes within the United Kingdom
• Sponsorship and donation of kit to local junior sports clubs and schools
Policy on Acquired Businesses
The Group has acquired a number of retail and distribution businesses in
recent years, and acknowledges that the high standards which the core retail
businesses have historically operated to, need to be replicated in the wider
global Group.
After making an acquisition, staff from the core retail businesses, with the
relevant knowledge and experience, work with the management teams at these
acquired businesses. The initial focus is to help the local management analyse
their position against these standards with action plans developed as necessary.
Standards of the existing Group companies, along with any future acquisitions,
will continue to be monitored, with action taken to maintain Group standards
as required.
35
The Board
Peter Cowgill
Executive Chairman
and Chairman of the
Nomination Committee
aged 58
Peter was appointed
Executive Chairman in March
2004. He was previously
Finance Director of the Group
until his resignation in June
2001. Since then he has been
a partner in Cowgill Holloway
Chartered Accountants. He is
a Non-Executive Director of a
number of private companies and
Non-Executive Chairman of United
Carpets Plc and MBL Group Plc.
Barry Bown
Chief Executive Officer aged 49
Barry joined the Board in 2000 and has
been with JD Sports Fashion Plc since
1984. He held the positions of Head of Retail,
Head of Buying and Merchandising and Chief
Operating Officer prior to his appointment as
Chief Executive Officer in 2000.
Brian Small
Group Finance Director aged 54
Brian was appointed Finance Director in January
2004. Immediately prior to his appointment he was
Operations Finance Director at Intercare Group Plc
and has also been Finance Director of a number of
other companies. He qualified as an accountant with
Price Waterhouse in 1981.
Colin Archer
Non-Executive Director, Chairman of the Audit
and Remuneration Committees and member of
the Nomination Committee aged 69
Colin was appointed a Non-Executive Director in
November 2001. He has over 40 years experience
in the banking and financial arenas, having
previously been an Assistant Corporate Director
with Barclays Bank Plc. He is also a member of the
Chartered Institute of Bankers.
Chris Bird
Non-Executive Director, member of the Audit,
Remuneration and Nomination Committees
aged 48
Chris was appointed to the Board in May 2003.
He is a marketing specialist with his own public
relations and marketing agency. He is also Chief
Executive of Sports Tours International Limited.
Chris has over 20 years media experience in
newspapers, commercial radio and sport.
Andrew Leslie
Non-Executive Director aged 64
Andrew was appointed to the Board in May 2010.
He has over 40 years of experience in the retail,
footwear and apparel sectors. Most recently he
was an Executive Board Director of Pentland
Brands Plc (which is a subsidiary of the ultimate
parent company Pentland Group Plc), from which
he retired in 2008. During his career, Andrew also
held a number of senior positions with British Shoe
Corporation, The Burton Group Plc and Timpson
Shoes Limited.
36
Adidas terrace styles, all available at JD
37
Directors’ Report
38
The Directors present their annual report and the
audited financial statements of JD Sports Fashion
Plc (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiaries (together
referred to as the ‘Group’) for the 52 week period
ended 29 January 2011.
Principal Activities and Business
Review
The principal activity of the Group is the retail and
distribution of sport and athletic inspired fashion,
footwear, apparel and accessories.
In accordance with the Companies Act 2006, a
review of the business providing a comprehensive
analysis of the main trends and factors likely to
affect the development, performance and position
of the business, including environmental, employee
and social and community issues, together with
the Group’s Key Performance Indicators and a
description of the principal risks and uncertainties
facing the business is detailed as follows:
• Summary of Key Performance Indicators (page 7)
• Chairman’s Statement (pages 13 to 16)
• Financial and Risk Review (pages 19 to 21)
• Property and Stores Review (pages 26 to 27)
• Corporate and Social Responsibility
(pages 31 to 35)
All the information set out in those sections is
incorporated by reference into, and is deemed to
form part of, this report.
The Corporate Governance Report (pages 41 to
43) and the Directors’ Remuneration Report (pages
45 to 48) are incorporated by reference into, and
are deemed to form part of, this report.
As per note 35 on page 100, the Group has
completed the following acquisitions since the
period end:
• On 7 February 2011, the Group acquired 80% of
the issued share capital of Kukri Sports Limited
• On 16 February 2011, the Group acquired a
further 31% of the issued share capital of Focus
Group Brands Limited
• On 4 April 2011, the Group acquired 100% of the
issued share capital of Champion Sports (Holdings)
In addition the Group has signed a new syndicated
committed £75 million bank facility for 54 months
to 11 October 2015. Further details of the terms of
this facility are included in the Financial and Risk
Review on page 19 and in note 35 on page 101.
Results
Revenue for the 52 week period ended 29 January
2011 was £883.7 million and profit before tax was
£78.6 million compared with £769.8 million and
£61.4 million respectively in the previous
financial year.
The Consolidated Income Statement is set out on
page 56.
Proposed Dividend
The Directors recommend a final dividend of
19.20p per ordinary share (2010: 14.70p), which
together with the interim dividend of 3.80p per
ordinary share (2010: 3.30p) makes the total
dividend payable for the year 23.00p (2010:
18.00p). If approved by shareholders at the
forthcoming Annual General Meeting, this will be
paid on 1 August 2011 to shareholders on the
register as at close of business on 6 May 2011.
Share Capital
As at 29 January 2011 the Company’s authorised
share capital was £3,107,500 divided into
62,150,000 ordinary shares of 5p each. As at 29
January 2011 the Company’s issued share capital
was £2,433,083 comprising 48,661,658 ordinary
shares of 5p each.
Shareholder and Voting Rights
All members who hold ordinary shares are entitled
to attend and vote at the Company’s Annual
General Meeting. On a show of hands at a general
meeting, every member present in person or by
proxy shall have one vote and, on a poll, every
member present in person or by proxy shall have
one vote for every ordinary share they hold. Subject
to relevant statutory provisions and the Company’s
Articles of Association, holders of ordinary shares
are entitled to a dividend where declared or paid
out of profits available for such purposes.
Restrictions on Transfer of Shares
The restrictions on the transfer of shares in the
Company are as follows:
• The Board may, in absolute discretion, refuse to
register any transfer of shares which are not fully
paid up (but not so as to prevent dealings in listed
shares from taking place), or which is in favour of
more than four persons jointly or which is in relation
to more than one class of share
• Certain restrictions may, from time to time, be
imposed by laws and regulations (for example,
insider trading laws)
• Restrictions apply pursuant to the Listing
Rules of the Financial Services Authority
whereby Directors and certain of the Group’s
employees require prior approval to deal in the
Company’s shares
The Company is not aware of any arrangement
between its shareholders that may result in
restrictions on the transfer of shares and/or
voting rights.
Authority to Purchase Own Shares
A resolution was passed at the 2010 Annual
General Meeting giving Directors authority to buy
back ordinary shares up to a maximum of 10%
of the total issued ordinary share capital of the
Company. As at the date of this report no shares
have been purchased under this authority.
Directors’ Interests
The interests of the Directors who held office at
29 January 2011 and their connected persons in
the Company’s ordinary shares are shown below:
Ordinary shares of 5p each
29 January
2011
30 January
2010
410,263
410,263
5,676
21,750
19,121
5,676
21,750
19,121
456,810
456,810
P Cowgill
B Bown
B Small
C Archer
There has been no change in the interests of the
Directors or their connected persons between 29
January 2011 and the date of this report.
Substantial Interests in Share Capital
As at 12 April 2011 the Company has been advised
of the following significant holdings of voting
rights in its ordinary share capital pursuant to the
Disclosure and Transparency Rules:
Number of
ordinary
shares/voting
rights held
%
Pentland Group Plc
27,963,722
57.47
Sports World
International Ltd
Aberforth Funds*
5,775,255
11.87
4,305,940
8.85
*Aberforth Funds have a further non-voting holding
of 1,682,900 ordinary shares.
Directors
The names and roles of the current Directors
together with brief biographical details are given
on page 36. The Directors are responsible for the
management of the business of the Company
and, subject to law and the Company’s Articles of
Association (‘Articles’), the Directors may exercise
all of the powers of the Company and may delegate
their power and discretion to committees.
The number of directors at any one point in time
shall not be less than two.
The Articles give the Directors power to appoint
and replace directors. Any director so appointed
shall hold office only until the dissolution of the first
AGM of the Company following appointment unless
they are re-elected during such meeting.
The Articles require that, at each AGM of the
Company, any director who was elected or last
re-elected at or before the AGM held in the third
calendar year before the then current calendar year
must retire by rotation and such further Directors
must retire by rotation so that in total not less than
one third of the Directors retire by rotation each
year. A retiring director is eligible for re-election.
The UK Corporate Governance Code applies to
financial years commencing on or after 29 June
2010 and provides for the annual re-election of
all directors. The Board has decided to comply
with this provision with immediate effect and
so all Directors listed on page 36 will retire at
the forthcoming AGM and, being eligible, offer
themselves for re-election.
Amendment of the Company’s Articles
of Association
The Company’s Articles of Association may only
be amended by a special resolution at a general
meeting of shareholders.
Change of Control – Significant
Agreements
Creditors Payment Policy
In the event of a change of control of the Company,
the Company and the lenders of the new £75
million bank syndicated facility shall enter into an
agreement to determine how to continue the facility.
If no agreement is reached within 20 business days
of the date of change in control, the lenders may,
by giving not less than 10 business days notice
to the Company, cancel the facility and declare all
outstanding loans, together with accrued interest
and all other amounts accrued immediately due
and payable.
Contractual Arrangements Essential
to the Business of the Group
The Board considers that continuing supply from
Nike and Adidas, being the main suppliers of third
party branded sporting products, to the Group’s
core sports fashion retail operation is essential to
the business of the Group.
Employees
The Group communicates with its employees
through team briefs and via the Company’s intranet
and notice boards. Views of employees are sought
on matters of common concern. Priority is given to
ensuring that employees are aware of all significant
matters affecting the Group’s performance and of
significant organisational changes.
For all trade creditors, it is the Group policy to:
• Agree terms of payment at the start of business
with the supplier
• Ensure that suppliers are aware of the terms
of payment
• Pay in accordance with its contractual and other
legal obligations
The average number of days taken to pay trade
creditors by the Group at the period end was 33
(2010: 36).
The Group does not follow any code or statement
on payment practice.
Auditor
KPMG Audit Plc have indicated their willingness to
accept reappointment as auditors of the Company.
A resolution proposing their reappointment
is contained in the notice of the forthcoming
Annual General Meeting and will be proposed to
shareholders at that meeting.
Disclosure of Information to the Auditor
Each person who is a Director at the date of
approval of this report confirms that:
The Group’s employee remuneration strategy is set
out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages
45 to 48.
• So far as he is aware, there is no relevant audit
information of which the Company’s auditor is
unaware
The Group is committed to promote equal
opportunities in employment regardless of
employees’ or potential employees’ sex, marital
status, sexual orientation, creed, colour, race,
ethnic origin or disability. Recruitment, promotion
and the availability of training are based on the
suitability of any applicant for the job and full
and fair consideration is always given to disabled
persons in such circumstances.
Should an employee become disabled during his or
her employment by the Group, every effort is made
to continue employment and training within their
existing capacity wherever practicable, or failing
that, in some alternative suitable capacity.
• Each Director has taken all the steps that he
ought to have taken as a Director to make himself
aware of any relevant audit information and to
establish that the Company’s auditor is aware of
that information
Going Concern
After making enquiries, the Directors have a
reasonable expectation that the Company, and
the Group as a whole, has adequate resources
to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future. For this reason, the financial
statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis.
Donations
During the financial year ended 29 January 2011
the Group did not make any political donations
(2010: £nil) and made charitable donations
of £39,000 (2010: £54,000). Of the charitable
donations, £10,000 was for The Geoff Thomas
Foundation which works closely with Leukaemia &
Lymphoma Research on raising funds to speed up
the delivery of effective new treatments to patients
with blood cancer.
Annual General Meeting (AGM)
Notice of the Company’s AGM to be held at 12
noon on 23 June 2011 at Hollinsbrook Way,
Pilsworth, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 8RR incorporating
explanatory notes of the resolutions to be proposed
at the meeting is enclosed, together with a form of
proxy. A copy of the Notice of AGM is available on
the Company’s website www.jdplc.com.
By order of the Board
Jane Brisley
Company Secretary
13 April 2011
39
40
Mckenzie fleece suit, exclusive to JD
Corporate
Governance Report
Combined Code
The Board is committed to high standards of corporate governance. This
report sets out how the Company has applied the main principles set out in
the Combined Code on Corporate Governance published by the Financial
Reporting Council in June 2008 (‘the Combined Code’) and the extent to which
the Company has complied with the provisions of the Code.
The Board
The Board consists of six directors: an Executive Chairman, two other
Executive Directors and three Non-Executive Directors. The name, position and
brief profile of each Director is set out on page 36.
Composition of the Board is kept under review and changes are made when
appropriate and in the best interests of the Group. Since publication of the
last Annual Report the Company appointed Andrew Leslie to the Board as
a Non-Executive Director. Mr Leslie has over 40 years of experience in the
retail, footwear and apparel sectors and his most recent position was as an
Executive Board Director of Pentland Brands Plc (which is a subsidiary of the
ultimate parent company Pentland Group Plc), from which he retired in 2008.
The Board considers that its composition during the year had the necessary
balance of Executive and Non-Executive Directors providing the desired
blend of skills, experience and judgement appropriate for the needs of the
Group’s business and overall effectiveness of the Board. None of the Directors
have served for more than three years without having been re-elected by
shareholders. Colin Archer is the senior independent Non-Executive Director.
Two Non-Executive Directors, Colin Archer and Chris Bird, are considered to
be independent by the Board. Colin Archer has served on the Board for more
than nine years, having been appointed on 6 November 2001. The Board
considers Mr Archer to be independent for the purposes of the Combined
Code as, in the Board’s view, he continues to be independent in character and
judgment notwithstanding his length of service. Andrew Leslie is not currently
considered to be independent by the Board for the purposes of the Combined
Code due to his former position as an executive director of Pentland Brands Plc,
a subsidiary of the Company’s largest shareholder. Mr Leslie does not
represent the interests of Pentland Group Plc on the Board and, due to the
period of time that will have elapsed since he retired in 2008, the Board
anticipate that it will determine him to be independent under the Code when
the Board next assesses this. The Board believes that all three Non-Executive
Directors have provided ample guidance to the Board and perform an effective
role in challenging the Executive Directors when appropriate.
The Board considers that all the Directors are able to devote sufficient time
to their duties as Directors of the Company. The brief biographical detail on
page 36 includes details of the Chairman’s other directorships of listed
companies. The Board is satisfied that these appointments do not conflict
with the Chairman’s ability to carry out his role effectively for the Group.
In accordance with the recommendations of the UK Corporate Governance Code,
all Directors will retire and offer themselves for re-election at the 2011 AGM.
41
Board operation
The Board is responsible for the direction, management and performance of
the Company. The Board met ten times during the year under review. Directors’
attendance at Board and Committee meetings is set out in the table below. The
Board is responsible for providing effective leadership and promoting success
of the Group.
The Board has a formal schedule of matters reserved specifically to it
for decisions which include major strategic matters, approval of financial
statements, acquisitions and disposals and significant capital projects. The
Board delegates certain powers to a number of committees.
Board papers are circulated to Directors prior to Board meetings which include
up-to-date financial information, reports from the Executive Directors and
papers on major issues for consideration by the Board. The Board has a formal
procedure for Directors to obtain independent professional advice.
All Board members have full access to the Company Secretary who is a
fully admitted solicitor and attends all Board and Committee meetings. The
Company Secretary is responsible for advising the Board on Corporate
Governance matters. The appointment and removal of the Company Secretary
is a matter for the Board as a whole to determine.
All newly appointed Directors will receive a tailored induction when they join
the Board or a Committee. Relevant training can be arranged as and when
deemed appropriate.
The Board has established a formal process for the annual evaluation of the
performance of the Board, its Committees and individual Directors. This has
been conducted through the completion by each Director of a questionnaire
prepared by the Company Secretary which encourages the Directors to
give his opinions on Board and Committee procedures, operation and
effectiveness as well as any other matter they wish to raise. The feedback
from the evaluation process has been presented to the Board by the Executive
Chairman. A separate questionnaire was completed by the Directors (other
than the Executive Chairman) in relation to the performance of the Executive
Chairman with the Senior Independent Director discussing the resulting
feedback with the other Non-Executive Directors, taking into account the views
of the other Executive Directors (excluding the Executive Chairman).
The division of responsibilities between the Executive Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer is in writing and has been agreed by the Board. The Chairman is
responsible for overall Board leadership, corporate strategy and communication
with major shareholders. The Chief Executive Officer’s responsibilities are
focused on the development of the Group’s core retail operations.
The Company, through its majority shareholder Pentland Group Plc, maintains
appropriate Directors and Officers liability insurance.
Attendance at Board and Committee meetings
Board Committees
There are three principal Board Committees to which the Board has delegated
certain of its responsibilities. The terms of reference for all three Committees
are available for inspection on request and are available on the Company’s
corporate website www.jdplc.com.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee currently comprises the two independent Non-Executive
Directors, Colin Archer (Chairman) and Chris Bird. The Committee’s principal
duties are to review draft annual and interim financial statements prior to being
submitted to the Board, reviewing the effectiveness of the Group’s system of
internal control and risk management and to review the performance and cost
effectiveness of the external auditor.
The Audit Committee met three times in the year with the external auditor
attending each meeting. Details of attendance at Audit Committee meetings
are set out above.
In the year the Audit Committee discharged its responsibilities by:
• Reviewing the Group’s draft financial statements and interim results
statement prior to Board approval and reviewing the external auditor’s
detailed reports thereon
• Reviewing the Group’s Christmas trading update announcement prior to release
• Reviewing the appropriateness of the Group’s accounting policies
• Reviewing regularly the potential impact on the Group’s financial statements
of certain matters such as impairments of fixed asset values and proposed
International Accounting Standards
• Reviewing the external auditor’s plan for the audit of the Group’s financial
statements, key risks of misstatement in the financial statements,
confirmations of auditor independence, audit fee and terms of engagement
of the auditor
• Reviewing non-audit fees payable to the Group’s external auditor.
In reviewing the non-audit fees, the Committee also considered the
independence of the external auditor and whether its engagement to supply
non-audit services is appropriate. During the year the Group has appointed
other accountancy firms to provide non-audit services
The Audit Committee is also responsible for ensuring that appropriate
arrangements are in place for employees to be able to raise matters of
possible impropriety in confidence.
A breakdown of the audit and non-audit related fees is set out in note 3 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 68. The Audit Committee
is satisfied that the level and scope of non-audit services performed by the
external auditor does not impact their independence.
Board
Meetings
Remuneration
Committee
Audit
Committee
Nomination
Committee
The Audit Committee keeps under review the relationship between the Group
and external auditor and, having considered the external auditor’s performance
during their period in office, recommends their reappointment.
Number of
meetings in
year
P Cowgill
B Bown
B Small
C Archer
C Bird
A Leslie*
10
10
10
10
10
10
7
4
3
-
3
4
4
-
3
3
-
3
3
3
-
1
1
-
-
1
1
-
*A Leslie joined the Board on 1 May 2010 and so his attendance reflects the
nine month period to 29 January 2011.
Peter Cowgill and Brian Small attended the Remuneration Committee
meetings and the Audit Committee meetings at the invitation of the members
of those committees.
Conflicts of interest
The Company’s Articles of Association permit the Board to consider and, if it
sees fit, to authorise situations where a Director has an interest that conflicts,
or possibly could conflict, with the interests of the Company. The Board
considers that the procedures it has in place for reporting and considering
conflicts of interest are effective.
42
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee currently comprises the two independent Non-
Executive Directors, Colin Archer (Chairman) and Chris Bird.
The Committee’s principal duties are to determine overall Group
remuneration policy, remuneration packages for Executive Directors and senior
management, the terms of Executive Director service contracts, the terms
of any performance-related schemes operated by the Group and awards
thereunder.
The Committee met four times during the year. Details of attendance at
Remuneration Committee meetings are set out in the previous table.
Further details about Directors’ remuneration are set out in the Directors’
Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 48.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee currently comprises the Executive Chairman and
the two independent Non-Executive Directors.
The Committee’s principal duties are to consider the size, structure and
composition of the Board, ensure appropriate succession plans are in place
for the Board and, where necessary, consider new appointments to the Board.
From time to time the full Board performs some of the duties of the Nomination
Committee.
The Nomination Committee met once during the year. Details of attendance at
the Nomination Committee meeting are set out in the table above.
During the year the Nomination Committee considered the appointment of
a further Non-Executive Director, Andrew Leslie, following recommendation
from Pentland Group Plc, the Company’s largest shareholder. Following due
consideration, the Nomination Committee recommended to the Board that Mr
Leslie be appointed as a Non-Executive Director. The Nomination Committee
did not consider the use of an external search consultancy nor open
advertisement to be necessary in relation to this appointment as Mr Leslie
was considered by the Nomination Committee to be a suitable candidate with
considerable relevant experience.
Internal Control
Shareholder Relations
There is an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the
significant risks faced by the Group. This process has been in place for the
year under review and accords with the Turnbull guidance.
The Board, in conjunction with the Audit Committee, has full responsibility
for the Group’s system of internal controls and monitoring their effectiveness.
However, such a system is designed to manage rather than eliminate
the risk of failure to achieve business objectives, and can only provide
reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement.
The Board has established a well-defined organisation structure with clear
operating procedures, lines of responsibility, delegated authority to executive
management and a comprehensive financial reporting process.
Key features of the Group’s system of internal control and risk management are:
The Executive Directors maintain an active dialogue with the Company’s major
shareholders to enhance understanding of their respective objectives. The
Executive Chairman provides feedback to the Board on issues raised by major
shareholders. This is supplemented by twice yearly formal feedback to the
Board on meetings between management, analysts and investors which seeks
to convey the financial market’s perception of the Group.
The Senior Independent Non-Executive Director is available to shareholders if
they have concerns which have not been resolved through dialogue with the
Executive Directors, or for which such contact is inappropriate.
External brokers’ reports on the Group are circulated to the Board for
consideration. In addition, the Non-Executive Directors attend results
presentations and analyst and institutional investor meetings whenever possible.
• Identification and monitoring of the business risks facing the Group, with
major risks identified and reported to the Audit Committee and the Board
• Detailed appraisal and authorisation procedures for capital investment
The AGM is attended by all Directors, and shareholders are invited to ask
questions during the meeting and to meet with Directors after the formal
proceedings have ended. At the AGM the level of proxies lodged on each
resolution is announced to the meeting after the show of hands for that resolution.
Compliance with the Combined Code
The Directors consider that during the year under review and to the date of this
report, the Company complied with the Combined Code.
This report was approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:
Jane Brisley
Company Secretary
13 April 2011
• Prompt preparation of comprehensive monthly management accounts
providing relevant, reliable and up-to-date information. These allow for
comparison with budget and previous year’s results. Significant variances
from approved budgets are investigated as appropriate
• Preparation of comprehensive annual profit and cash flow budgets allowing
management to monitor business activities and major risks and the progress
towards financial objectives in the short and medium term
• Monitoring of store procedures and the reporting and investigation of
suspected fraudulent activities
• Reconciliation and checking of all cash and stock balances and investigation
of any material differences
In addition, the Audit Committee receives reports from the external auditor in
relation to the financial statements and the Group’s system of internal controls.
The Group has a formal whistle blowing policy in place enabling employees to
raise concerns in relation to the Group’s activities on a confidential basis.
The Board has reviewed the effectiveness of the Group’s system of internal
controls and believes this to be effective. In establishing the system of internal
controls the Directors have regard to the materiality of relevant risks, the
likelihood of a loss being incurred and costs of control. It follows, therefore,
that the system of internal controls can only provide a reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance against the risk of material misstatement or loss.
The integration of the recently acquired businesses into the Group’s system of
internal controls is on-going.
The scope of internal audit work performed is determined by the Board
in conjunction with the Loss Control Director who reports directly to the
Board periodically. The primary focus has continued to be on security
and minimisation of unauthorised losses in the business using a team of
appropriately experienced employees.
The Company does not currently have a separate internal audit function.
Following annual review, the Board has determined that, due to the further
global expansion of the Groups’ activities, the appointment of an internal
auditor is now appropriate and a search and selection process is currently
underway to recruit a suitable candidate for this role.
The responsibility for internal control procedures within joint ventures rests
with the senior management of those operations. The Company monitors
its investment in such ventures and exerts influence through Board
representation.
43
44
Nike hoody and gilet, both exclusive to JD
Directors’
Remuneration
Report
This Report sets out the remuneration policy operated by the Group in respect
of the Executive Directors, together with disclosures on Directors’ remuneration
required by The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts
and Reports) Regulations 2008 (‘the Regulations’). The auditor is required
to report on the ‘auditable’ part of this Report and to state whether, in their
opinion, that part of the Report has been properly prepared in accordance
with the Companies Act 2006. The Report is therefore divided into separate
sections for audited and unaudited information.
The Board have reviewed the Group’s compliance with the Combined Code
on Corporate Governance (June 2008) (‘the Code’) on remuneration related
matters. It is the opinion of the Board that the Group complied with all
remuneration related aspects of the Code during the year.
The Report will be subject to an advisory shareholder vote at the Annual
General Meeting (‘AGM’) on 23 June 2011.
UNAUDITED INFORMATION
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee (the ‘Committee’) comprises two independent
Non-Executive Directors, being Colin Archer and Chris Bird. Colin Archer is
Chairman of the Committee.
The Committee assists the Board in determining the Group’s policy on
Executive Directors’ remuneration and determines the specific remuneration
packages for senior executives, including the Executive Directors, on behalf
of the Board. Peter Cowgill, the Executive Chairman, Barry Bown, the Chief
Executive Officer, and Brian Small, the Group Finance Director have assisted
the Committee when requested with regards to matters concerning key
executives below Board level.
The Committee can obtain independent advice at the Company’s expense
where they consider it appropriate and in order to perform their duties.
The Committee is formally constituted with written Terms of Reference,
which are available on the Company’s corporate website www.jdplc.com. The
Committee is willing to engage with any of the major shareholders or other
representative groups where appropriate concerning remuneration matters.
The Committee is mindful of the Company’s social, ethical and environmental
responsibilities and is satisfied that the current remuneration arrangements
and policies do not encourage irresponsible behaviour.
The Committee has met four times during the year under review with each
member attending all the meetings. Details of attendance at the Committee
meetings are set out on page 42.
Remuneration Policy
The Group operates in a highly competitive retail and distribution environment
and the Committee seeks to ensure that the level and form of remuneration is
appropriate to attract, retain and motivate Directors and senior managers who
are the cornerstone of the continued success of the Company.
Whilst it is inevitable that policies and practice in respect of remuneration will
evolve over time, it is the Committee’s belief that the key principles described
below, which applied in the year to 29 January 2011, remain appropriate and
will continue for the financial year to 28 January 2012:
• The total remuneration which can be earned should be set at a level which
ensures the retention and motivation of key executives of the necessary
calibre required to execute the business strategy and enhance shareholder
value
• Remuneration should be aligned with the key corporate metrics that drive
earnings growth and increased shareholder value with significant emphasis
on performance related pay measured over the longer term
• Incentive arrangements for key individuals should provide an appropriate
balance between fixed and performance related elements and be capable
of providing exceptional levels of total payment if outstanding performance
is achieved
45
Components of Remuneration
The main components of the current remuneration package are:
Cash based long term incentive plans
In 2008, the Committee proposed the introduction of a cash based Long Term
Incentive Plan (‘2008 LTIP’) in order to:
Base salary
The following factors are taken into account when determining base salary levels:
• Provide the Committee with the necessary mechanism with which to retain
the Executive Directors who are critical to driving shareholder value
• Remuneration levels at comparable UK retail companies
• The need for salaries to be competitive
• Provide the Executive Directors with the opportunity to earn competitive
rewards which was previously severely restricted by the absence of any long
term incentive plan
• The performance of the individual Executive Director and their contribution to
• Align the Executive Directors’ interests more closely with those of the shareholders
the business
• Experience and responsibilities
• Pay and employment conditions throughout the Group
The policy of the Committee is that the salaries of the Executive Directors
should be reviewed annually, although it reserves the right to review salaries
on a discretionary basis if it becomes apparent that the Group is at risk of
losing a key Board member or other senior executive, or if it believes an
adjustment is required to reflect market rates or performance. The Committee
exercised this discretionary right twice in the year. Firstly, the salary of the
Executive Chairman was increased from £422,742 to £700,000 with this
increase being applied retrospectively to 1 April 2010. The Committee believes
that this salary reflects the personal contribution that the Executive Chairman
has made to the turnaround of the Group since 2004, its outstanding
performance since then and the Executive Chairman’s substantial increased
time commitment. The Committee firmly believes that this salary increase
was necessary to ensure the retention of the Executive Chairman and that
his ongoing retention is critical in enhancing shareholder value. Secondly,
the salary of the Group Finance Director was increased from £191,941 to
£200,000 with this increase being applied from 1 October 2010.
The Committee have determined that salaries for the Executive Directors
should be increased (effective from 1 April 2011) as follows:
Executive
Director
P Cowgill
B Bown
B Small
Previous
Salary
£000
New
Salary
£000
Percentage
Increase
700
302
200
700
310
205
0.0%
2.5%
2.5%
Position
Against
Comparator
Group
Upper
Quartile
Lower
Quartile
Lower
Quartile
The Comparator Group for these purposes is the FTSE 250 companies.
These salary increases are consistent with pay increases implemented
throughout the Group.
Annual bonus
The Group offers Executive Directors and senior executives the opportunity
to earn performance related bonuses through the achievement of challenging
EPS targets. The Committee reviews these targets at the beginning and end
of each financial year to ensure that they remain fair and challenging and are
appropriate to the current market conditions and position of the Group.
Whilst the normal maximum bonus potential is 100% of salary, the Committee
has the discretion to pay bonuses above that level for exceptional performance.
This discretion was utilised in the year to 29 January 2011 with awards of
120% of salary awarded to the Executive Directors. The Committee feels
that this award is fully justified given that the Group’s performance was
considerably above market expectations early in the financial year.
Special retention payment
At the 2011 AGM, the Board will be proposing a special retention scheme for
the Executive Chairman designed to ensure that he is retained until at least
31 March 2014 and focused on driving shareholder value. The proposed
retention scheme has been discussed with two of the Company’s three
largest shareholders, Pentland Group Plc and Aberforth Funds, who are
supportive of it. Full details are set out in the 2011 Notice of Annual
General Meeting accompanying this Annual Report.
• Focus the Executive Directors on sustaining and improving the long-term
financial performance of the Company and reward them appropriately for
doing so
• Ensure a more appropriate balance in the Executive Directors’ compensation
between fixed and performance related elements
The 2008 LTIP was subsequently approved by shareholders at the Annual
General Meeting held on 26 June 2008 and consisted of two separate awards
that would pay out in cash after two and three years respectively, subject to
continued employment and meeting performance targets which would drive the
creation of shareholder value. The Committee gave considerable thought as to
whether the awards should pay out in cash or shares and decided that given
the current shareholder structure and the lack of a large free float, the delivery
mechanism should be in cash although all payments would be
non-pensionable.
The following table outlines the structure of the 2008 LTIP:
Performance To
Amount Payable:
P Cowgill
B Bown
B Small
Other Key Executives
1st Award
2nd Award
30 January 2010
£000
29 January 2011
£000
400
350
250
1,500
2,500
450
394
281
1,625
2,750
The targets for these awards were average headline earnings of £40 million
for the three year period ending 30 January 2010 and £48 million for the three
year period ending 29 January 2011. Consequently these awards have been
paid in full. Headline earnings are defined as profit before tax and exceptional
items (including the share of exceptional items of the joint venture).
To ensure the continued retention and motivation of the Executive Directors
and other Key Executives the Board put forward a new cash based Long Term
Incentive Plan (‘2010 LTIP’) to the Annual General Meeting held on 9 June
2010. This proposal, which was for a single payment only, was approved with
the structure set out below:
Performance To
Amount Payable:
P Cowgill
B Bown
B Small
Other Key Executives
2 February 2013
£000
500
437
313
2,750
4,000
The 2010 LTIP will be payable in full in 2013 if the following performance
conditions are both satisfied:
• Average headline earnings (defined above) of £74 million over the three year
performance period from 31 January 2010 to 2 February 2013
• Absolute headline earnings of at least £74 million in the year to 2 February 2013
Lower awards to a minimum of 40% will be paid on a sliding scale if the
performance on either of these criteria is in the range of £70 million to
£74 million. If the performance under either of these criteria is below
£70 million then no award will be payable.
46
Again, the Committee determined that, given the current shareholder structure
and the lack of a large free float, the delivery mechanism for the 2010 LTIP will
be in cash although all payments will be non-pensionable.
An amount of £2,250,000 has been recognised in the Consolidated Income
Statement for the period ended 29 January 2011 (2010: £1,750,000) being
one-third of the 2nd award of the 2008 LTIP payable (2010: one-third of 1st
award and one-third of 2nd award) and one-third of the 2010 LTIP payable
(2010: nil). These amounts are consistent with the vesting profile of a three
year performance period.
Other benefits
The Company makes contributions into individual personal pension schemes
for Barry Bown and Brian Small at a defined percentage of salary, excluding
bonus and other forms of remuneration.
Other benefits vary from director to director and include entitlement to a fully
expensed car, private health care for the Executive Director and immediate
family and life assurance to provide cover equal to four times the Executive
Director’s salary. Car benefits have been calculated in accordance with HM
Revenue and Customs scale charges.
The Executive Chairman does not receive any pension contribution
or car allowance.
The Committee actively reviews the levels of benefit received to ensure
that they remain competitive in the UK quoted environment.
Service Contracts
Total Shareholder Return
The following graph shows the Total Shareholder Return (’TSR’) of the Group
in comparison to the FTSE All Share General Retailers Index over the past five
years. The Committee consider the FTSE All Share General Retailers Index a
relevant index for total shareholder return comparison disclosure required under
the Regulations as the index represents the broad range of UK quoted retailers.
TSR is calculated for each financial year end relative to the base date of
31 January 2006 by taking the percentage change of the market price over
the relevant period, re-investing any dividends at the ex-dividend rate.
400
350
300
250
%
200
150
100
50
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
JD Sports Fashion Plc
Details of the contracts currently in place for Executive Directors are as follows:
FTSE All Share General Retailers Index
Date Of Contract
16 March 2004
20 February 2009
10 March 2004
Notice Period
(Months)
12
12
12
Unexpired Term
Rolling 12 months
Rolling 12 months
Rolling 12 months
P Cowgill
B Bown
B Small
Each service contract includes provision for compensation commitments in
the event of early termination. For each of the Executive Directors, these
commitments do not exceed one year’s salary and benefits. The Committee
consider these levels of compensation for loss of office appropriate in light of
the levels of basic salary levels and prevailing market conditions.
In the event of gross misconduct, the Company may terminate the service
contract of an Executive Director immediately and with no liability to make
further payments other than in respect of amounts accrued at the date of
termination.
The service agreements and letters of appointment are available for inspection
by shareholders at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting and during normal
business hours at the Company’s registered office address.
In accordance with the recommendations of the UK Corporate Governance
Code, all Directors will retire and offer themselves for re-election at the 2011
AGM.
Non-Executive Directorships
The Board recognises that Executive Directors may be invited to become
Non-Executive Directors of other businesses and that the knowledge and
experience which they gain in those appointments could be of benefit to the
Company. Prior approval of the Board is required before acceptance of any
new appointments.
During the year to 29 January 2011, only Peter Cowgill held Non-Executive
positions through his role as Non-Executive Chairman of United Carpets Group
Plc and MBL Group Plc. He has retained earnings of £372,000 in respect of
these offices.
Non-Executive Directors
The Non-Executive Directors have entered into letters of appointment with the
Company which are terminable by the Non-Executive Director or the Company
on not less than three months’ notice.
Non-Executive Director remuneration is determined by the Board taking into
account the scope and nature of their duties and market rates. The Non-
Executive Directors do not participate in the Company’s incentive arrangements
and no pension contributions are made in respect of them. Details of their fees
are set out in the audited information on page 48.
47
AUDITED INFORMATION
Individual Directors’ Emoluments
Directors’ salaries and benefits charged in the period to 29 January 2011 are
set out below together with comparatives for the period to 30 January 2010.
Salary and
Fees
Benefits
Excluding
Pensions
Annual
Performance
Related
Bonus
2011 Total
2010 Total
£000
£000
652
300
193
39
29
22
1,235
1
1
21
-
-
-
23
£000
840
362
240
-
-
-
£000
1,493
663
454
39
29
22
£000
1,321
587
393
38
28
-
1,442
2,700
2,367
2011 Pension
Costs
2010 Pension
Costs
£000
£000
-
24
23
-
-
-
47
-
22
22
-
-
-
44
P Cowgill (i)
B Bown
B Small
C Archer
C Bird
A Leslie (ii)
(i) Emoluments for Peter Cowgill in 2010 included £500,000 from the special
retention payment approved by shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting held on 26 June 2008. The final payment under this arrangement
was made in March 2010. The emoluments for 2011 reflect the increased
salary which was determined during the year.
(ii) Andrew Leslie joined the Board on 1 May 2010. His emoluments therefore
reflect the nine month period to 29 January 2011.
The pension contributions represent amounts payable to defined contribution
pension schemes.
Cash Based Long Term Incentive Plans
In addition, the following amounts have been provided in the period ended
29 January 2011 in respect of the Long Term Incentive Plans. The amounts
recognised comprise one third of the amount proposed for the 2nd award of
the 2008 LTIP based on Group performance in the final year of the three year
vesting period and one third of the 2010 LTIP based on Group performance in
the first year of the three year vesting period.
The 2010 LTIP will be payable in 2013 subject to the Group reaching certain
performance targets over the three year performance period to 2 February
2013 as described above.
P Cowgill
B Bown
B Small
2011
£000
317
277
177
771
2010
£000
283
248
177
708
This report has been prepared on behalf of the Board.
Colin Archer
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
13 April 2011
48
Bank, Trafford Centre, Manchester
49
50
“The final
dividend
has been
increased
by 31%”
South Africa international and
Canterbury Brand Ambassador, Bryan Habana,
wearing Canterbury technical Base Layer garments
51
Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities in
Respect of the Annual Report
and the Financial Statements
Responsibilities of Directors
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Group
and Parent Company financial statements in accordance with applicable law
and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Group and Parent Company
financial statements for each financial year. Under that law they are required
to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with IFRSs as
adopted by the EU and applicable law and have elected to prepare the Parent
Company financial statements on the same basis. Under company law the
Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied
that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and
Parent Company and of their profit or loss for that period. In preparing each
of the Group and Parent Company financial statements, the Directors are
required to:
• Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently
• Make judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent
• State whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as
adopted by the EU
• Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is
inappropriate to presume that the Group and the Parent Company will
continue in business
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that
are sufficient to show and explain the Parent Company’s transactions and
disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the
Parent Company and enable them to ensure that its financial statements
comply with the Companies Act 2006. They have general responsibility for
taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of
the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for
preparing a Directors’ Report, Directors’ Remuneration Report and Corporate
Governance Report that comply with that law and those regulations.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the
corporate and financial information included on the Group’s websites.
Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial
statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Responsibility Statement
Each of the Directors whose names and positions are set out on page 36
confirms that, to the best of their knowledge:
• The Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with the applicable set
of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities,
financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings
included in the consolidation taken as a whole
• The Directors’ Report includes a fair review of the development and
performance of the business and the position of the Company and the
undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face
By order of the Board
Brian Small
Group Finance Director
13 April 2011
52
Adidas hoody, track top,
tee and jog pants,
all available at JD
53
Independent Auditor’s
Report to the
Members of JD Sports
Fashion Plc
We have audited the financial statements of
JD Sports Fashion Plc for the year ended 29
January 2011, which comprise the Consolidated
Income Statement, Consolidated and Parent
Company Statement of Comprehensive Income,
Consolidated and Parent Company Statement
of Financial Position, Consolidated and Parent
Company Statement of Cash Flows, Consolidated
and Parent Company Statement of Changes in
Equity and the related notes set out on pages 56
to 102. The financial reporting framework that has
been applied in their preparation is applicable law
and International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRSs) as adopted by the EU and, as regards the
Parent Company financial statements, as applied in
accordance with the provisions of the Companies
Act 2006.
This report is made solely to the Company’s
members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter
3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit
work has been undertaken so that we might state
to the Company’s members those matters we are
required to state to them in an auditor’s report and
for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted
by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility
to anyone other than the Company and the
Company’s members, as a body, for our audit work,
for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of Directors
and Auditor
As explained more fully in the Statement of
Directors’ Responsibilities set out on page 52, the
Directors are responsible for the preparation of the
financial statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is
to audit, and express an opinion on, the financial
statements in accordance with applicable law
and International Standards on Auditing (UK and
Ireland). Those standards require us to comply
with the Auditing Practices Board’s (APB’s) Ethical
Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial
statements
A description of the scope of an audit of financial
statements is provided on the APB’s website at
www.frc.org.uk/apb/scope/private.cfm.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion:
• The financial statements give a true and fair view
of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent
Company’s affairs as at 29 January 2011 and of
the Group’s and the Parent Company’s profit for
the year then ended
• The Group financial statements have been
properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as
adopted by the EU
• The Parent Company financial statements have
been properly prepared in accordance with
IFRSs as adopted by the EU and as applied in
accordance with the provisions of the Companies
Act 2006
• The financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with the requirements of the
Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the
Group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS
Regulation
Opinion on other matters prescribed by
the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion:
• The part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report
to be audited has been properly prepared in
accordance with the Companies Act 2006
• The information given in the Directors’ Report
for the financial year for which the financial
statements are prepared is consistent with the
financial statements
• Information given in the Corporate Governance
Report with respect to internal control and risk
management systems in relation to financial
reporting processes and about share capital
structures is consistent with the financial
statements
Matters on which we are required to
report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the
following:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to
report to you if, in our opinion:
• Adequate accounting records have not been kept
by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for
our audit have not been received from branches
not visited by us
• The Parent Company financial statements and
the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report
to be audited are not in agreement with the
accounting records and returns
• Certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration
specified by law are not made
• We have not received all the information and
explanations we require for our audit
• A Corporate Governance Statement has not been
prepared by the Group
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:
• The Directors’ statement, set out on page 39,
in relation to going concern
• The part of the Corporate Governance Report
relating to the Company’s compliance with the
nine provisions of the June 2008 Combined Code
specified for our review
• Certain elements of the report to shareholders
by the Board on Directors’ remuneration
Stuart Burdass (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of:
KPMG Audit Plc
Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants
St James’ Square
Manchester
M2 6DS
13 April 2011
54
Carbrini hoody, exclusive to JD
55
Consolidated
Income Statement
For the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2011
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling and distribution expenses - normal
Selling and distribution expenses - exceptional
Selling and distribution expenses
Administrative expenses - normal
Administrative expenses - exceptional
Administrative expenses
Other operating income
Operating profit
Before exceptional items
Exceptional items
Operating profit
Share of results of joint venture before exceptional items
(net of income tax)
Share of exceptional items (net of income tax)
Share of results of joint venture
Financial income
Financial expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the period
Attributable to equity holders of the parent
Attributable to non-controlling interest
Basic earnings per ordinary share
Diluted earnings per ordinary share
Consolidated Statement
of Comprehensive Income
For the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2011
Profit for the period
Other comprehensive income:
Exchange differences on translation
of foreign operations
Total other comprehensive income for the period
Total comprehensive income and expense for the
period (net of income tax)
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
Note
883,669
(446,657)
437,012
(329,573)
(33,973)
2,177
75,643
79,927
(4,284)
75,643
1,475
1,348
2,823
618
(455)
78,629
(22,762)
55,867
55,884
(17)
114.84p
114.84p
(326,296)
(3,277)
(32,966)
(1,007)
4
4
4
17
17
17
7
8
3
9
10
10
(288,462)
(6,458)
(26,051)
1,472
769,785
(390,248)
379,537
(294,920)
(24,579)
2,270
62,308
67,294
(4,986)
62,308
539
(1,012)
(473)
385
(827)
61,393
(18,647)
42,746
42,900
(154)
88.16p
88.16p
GROUP
COMPANY
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
55,867
42,746
47,045
41,314
95
95
(248)
(248)
-
-
-
-
55,962
42,498
47,045
41,314
Attributable to equity holders of the parent
Attributable to non-controlling interest
55,979
(17)
42,652
(154)
47,045
-
41,314
-
56
Consolidated Statement
of Financial Position
As at 29 January 2011
Assets
Intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Investment property
Other assets
Equity accounted investment in joint venture
Investments
Deferred tax assets
Total non-current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Total current assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Income tax liabilities
Total current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Other payables
Provisions
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Total assets less total liabilities
Capital and reserves
Issued ordinary share capital
Share premium
Retained earnings
Other reserves
GROUP
COMPANY
As at
29 January 2011
£000
Note
As at
30 January 2010
(restated -
see note 1)
£000
As at
29 January 2011
£000
As at
30 January 2010
£000
13
14
15
16
17
18
27
20
21
22
23
25
26
23
25
26
27
28
58,315
78,120
3,000
13,047
3,458
-
125
50,215
67,434
4,053
13,232
635
-
-
28,096
51,539
3,000
3,590
-
9,064
1,082
19,395
47,445
4,053
3,787
-
7,864
610
156,065
135,569
96,371
83,154
84,490
37,105
90,131
74,475
31,657
64,524
47,472
82,535
81,204
44,125
77,380
56,954
211,726
170,656
211,211
178,459
367,791
306,225
307,582
261,613
(2,874)
(128,445)
(2,591)
(12,370)
(2,712)
(115,742)
(2,920)
(10,789)
-
(85,520)
(1,920)
(11,465)
-
(78,294)
(1,942)
(9,917)
(146,280)
(132,163)
(98,905)
(90,153)
(1,117)
(28,782)
(6,437)
-
(1,347)
(24,050)
(7,395)
(748)
-
(24,370)
(4,072)
-
-
(23,464)
(5,804)
-
(36,336)
(33,540)
(28,442)
(29,268)
(182,616)
(165,703)
(127,347)
(119,421)
185,175
140,522
180,235
142,192
2,433
11,659
171,916
(1,918)
2,433
11,659
125,341
(244)
2,433
11,659
166,143
-
2,433
11,659
128,100
-
Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent
184,090
139,189
180,235
142,192
Non-controlling interest
Total equity
1,085
1,333
-
-
185,175
140,522
180,235
142,192
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 13 April 2011 and were signed on its behalf by:
B Small
Director
Registered number: 1888425
57
Consolidated Statement
of Changes in Equity
For the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2011
GROUP
Ordinary
share
capital
£000
Share
premium
£000
Retained
earnings
£000
Other
equity
£000
Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
£000
Total equity
attributable
to equity
holders of
the parent
£000
Non-
controlling
interest
£000
Total
equity
£000
Balance at 31 January 2009
2,433
11,659
88,378
Profit for the period
Other comprehensive income:
Exchange differences on translation
of foreign operations
Total other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the period
Dividends to equity holders
Acquisition of non-controlling interest
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42,900
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42,900
(5,937)
-
Balance at 30 January 2010
2,433
11,659
125,341
Profit for the period
Other comprehensive income:
Exchange differences on translation
of foreign operations
Total other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the period
Dividends to equity holders
Put options held by non-controlling interests
Acquisition of non-controlling interest
Disposal of non-controlling interest
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
55,884
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
55,884
(9,002)
-
(627)
320
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,769)
-
-
4
102,474
1,295
103,769
-
42,900
(154)
42,746
(248)
(248)
(248)
(248)
-
-
(248)
(248)
(248)
-
-
42,652
(5,937)
-
(154)
-
192
42,498
(5,937)
192
(244)
139,189
1,333
140,522
-
55,884
(17)
55,867
95
95
95
95
-
-
95
95
95
55,979
(17)
55,962
-
-
-
-
(9,002)
(1,769)
(627)
320
-
-
(573)
342
(9,002)
(1,769)
(1,200)
662
Balance at 29 January 2011
2,433
11,659
171,916
(1,769)
(149)
184,090
1,085
185,175
Put options are held by the 49% non-controlling interest in Canterbury of New Zealand and 25% non-controlling interest in Canterbury International (Australia)
Pty Limited (see note 25).
COMPANY
Balance at 31 January 2009
Profit for the period
Total comprehensive income for the period
Dividends to equity holders
Balance at 30 January 2010
Profit for the period
Total comprehensive income for the period
Dividends to equity holders
Ordinary
share
capital
£000
Share
premium
£000
Retained
earnings
£000
Total
equity
£000
2,433
11,659
92,723
106,815
-
-
-
-
-
-
41,314
41,314
41,314
(5,937)
41,314
(5,937)
2,433
11,659
128,100
142,192
-
-
-
-
-
-
47,045
47,045
47,045
(9,002)
47,045
(9,002)
Balance at 29 January 2011
2,433
11,659
166,143
180,235
58
Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows
For the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit for the period
Share of results of joint venture
Income tax expense
Financial expenses
Financial income
Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets
Exchange differences on translation
Impairment of intangible assets
Impairment of non-current assets
Impairment of investment
Impairment of investment property
Profit on disposal of available for sale investments
Loss on disposal of non-current assets
Increase in inventories
Increase in trade and other receivables
Increase in trade and other payables
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
GROUP
COMPANY
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
Note
17
9
8
7
3
4
4
18
4
4
4
55,867
(2,823)
22,762
455
(618)
20,375
(158)
-
-
-
1,007
-
1,440
(9,622)
(5,209)
14,676
(455)
(22,002)
42,746
473
18,647
827
(385)
17,863
(49)
2,617
408
-
-
(4,089)
2,148
(6,062)
(8,179)
25,326
(827)
(15,848)
47,045
-
23,789
300
(844)
14,229
-
-
-
-
1,007
-
1,419
(3,347)
(6,111)
6,378
(300)
(21,761)
41,314
-
17,740
675
(549)
13,274
-
-
105
3,470
-
(4,089)
1,525
(1,114)
(23,597)
17,743
(675)
(16,089)
Net cash from operating activities
75,695
75,616
61,804
49,733
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received
Proceeds from sale of non-current assets
Disposal costs of non-current assets
Acquisition of intangible assets
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Acquisition of non-current other assets
Cash consideration of acquisitions
Cash acquired with acquisitions
Overdrafts acquired with acquisitions
Acquisition of available for sale investment
Proceeds from disposal of available for sale investment
Third party loan repayments
Loan repayments received from joint venture
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Repayment of interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Acquisition of non-controlling interest
Sale of subsidiary shares to non-controlling interest
Dividends paid
Net cash used in financing activities
13
14
11
11
11
19
19
16
11
12
29
618
1,082
(491)
(9,560)
(30,855)
(2,114)
-
-
-
-
-
-
923
385
532
(644)
(6,672)
(21,472)
(1,429)
(9,100)
2,273
(1,129)
(9,990)
16,132
80
1,750
844
19
(461)
(9,210)
(18,335)
(1,132)
-
-
-
-
-
-
923
549
2
(359)
-
(13,122)
(665)
(4,666)
-
-
(9,990)
16,132
80
1,750
(40,397)
(29,284)
(27,352)
(10,289)
(310)
(1,200)
662
(9,002)
(9,850)
(1,836)
-
-
(5,937)
-
(1,200)
-
(9,002)
(7,773)
(10,202)
(83)
-
-
(5,937)
(6,020)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
32
25,448
38,559
24,250
33,424
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
32
62,097
23,538
56,954
23,530
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
32
87,545
62,097
81,204
56,954
59
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements
1. Significant accounting policies
JD Sports Fashion Plc, (the ‘Company’) is a company incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom. The financial statements for the 52 week period ended
29 January 2011 represent those of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the ‘Group’). The Parent Company financial statements present
information about the Company as a separate entity and not about its Group.
The financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 13 April 2011.
Basis of preparation
European Union law (‘EU LAW’) (IAS Regulation EC 1606/2002) requires that the financial statements of the Group are prepared and approved in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU (‘adopted IFRSs’). The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of the
requirements of adopted IFRSs that are endorsed by the EU and effective at 29 January 2011.
The Company has chosen to present its own results under adopted IFRSs and by publishing the Company Financial Statements here, with the Group Financial
Statements, the Company is taking advantage of the exemption in s408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to present its individual income statement and related notes.
The financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, rounded to the nearest thousand.
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified for financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments)
at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with adopted IFRSs requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the
application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical
experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements
about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The judgements, estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in
which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.
The accounting policies set out below have unless otherwise stated been applied consistently to all periods present in these financial statements and have been
applied consistently by all Group entities.
The Group’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in the Executive Chairman’s
Statement and Financial and Risk Review on pages 13 and 19 respectively. In addition, details of financial instruments and exposures to interest rate, foreign
currency, credit and liquidity risks are outlined in note 24.
As at 29 January 2011, the Group had net cash balances of £86,140,000 (2010: £60,465,000) and undrawn committed borrowing facilities of £70,000,000.
Subsequent to the year end, a new committed borrowing facility of £75,000,000 has been agreed. Further information on this new facility is provided in note 35.
Given the funding position, the Directors believe that the Group is well placed to manage its business risks successfully.
After making enquiries, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in operational
existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Adoption of new and revised standards
From 31 January 2010 the Group has applied IFRS 3R ‘Business Combinations’ in accounting for business combinations. The change in accounting policy has
been applied prospectively.
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method as at the acquisition date, which is the date on which control is transferred to the Group.
Control is the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, the Group takes
into consideration potential voting rights that currently are exercisable.
For acquisitions on or after 31 January 2010, the Group measures goodwill at the acquisition date as:
• the fair value of the consideration transferred; plus
• the recognised amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree; plus
• if the business combination is achieved in stages, the fair value of the existing equity interest in the acquiree; less
• the net recognised amount of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
When the excess is negative, negative goodwill is recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.
The consideration transferred does not include amounts related to the settlement of pre-existing relationships. Such amounts are generally recognised in the
Consolidated Income Statement.
Costs related to the acquisition, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equity securities, that the Group incurs in connection with a business
combination are expensed as incurred.
Any contingent consideration payable is recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, it is not remeasured
and settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise, subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognised in the
Consolidated Income Statement.
For acquisitions from 1 February 2004 to 30 January 2010, goodwill represents the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the Group’s interest in the
recognised amount (generally fair value) of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquiree. When the excess was negative, negative
goodwill was recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement as an exceptional item. Transaction costs, other than those associated with the
issue of debt or equity securities, that the Group incurred in connection with business combinations were capitalised as part of the cost of the acquisition.
From 31 January 2010 the Group has applied IAS 27 ‘Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements’ (2008) in accounting for acquisitions of non-controlling
interests. The change in accounting policy has been applied prospectively and has had no impact on earnings per share. Under the new accounting policy,
acquisitions of non-controlling interests are accounted for as transactions with owners in their capacity as owners and therefore no goodwill is recognised as a
result of such transactions. The adjustments to non-controlling interests are based on a proportionate amount of the net assets of the subsidiary. Previously,
goodwill was recognised on the acquisition of non-controlling interests in a subsidiary, which represented the excess of the cost of the additional investment over
the carrying amount of the interest in the net assets acquired at the date of the transaction.
60
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
1. Significant accounting policies (continued)
Adoption of new and revised standards (continued)
A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been issued during the year ended 29 January 2011 but are not yet effective,
and therefore have not yet been adopted by the Group.
An amendment to IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’ (Classification of rights issues) is mandatory for years commencing on or after 1 February 2010.
The amendment allows rights, options or warrants to acquire a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments for a fixed amount of any currency to be
classified as equity instruments provided the entity offers the rights, options or warrants pro rata to all of its existing owners of the same class of its own non-
derivative equity instruments. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group.
Revised IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosure’ is mandatory for years commencing on or after 1 January 2011. The standard amends the definition of a related party
and modifies certain related party disclosure requirements for government-related entities. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant
impact on the Group.
IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ is applicable from 2013. If endorsed, this standard will simplify the classification of financial assets for measurement purposes,
but is not anticipated to have a significant impact on the financial statements.
The Group continues to monitor the potential impact of other new standards and interpretations which may be endorsed by the European Union and require
adoption by the Group in future reporting periods.
The Group does not consider that any other standards, amendments or interpretations issued by the IASB, but not yet applicable, will have a significant impact
on the financial statements.
Prior period restatement
The comparative Group Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 30 January 2010 has been restated to reflect the completion in the period to 29
January 2011 of initial accounting in respect of the acquisition of Kooga Rugby Limited made in the period to 30 January 2010. Adjustments made to the
provisional calculation of the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired, as reported at 30 January 2010, in the period to 29 January 2011, resulted in an
increase to goodwill of £94,000. The impact of this adjustment on the net liabilities is shown in note 11. As the acquisition of Kooga Rugby Limited occurred in
the year to 30 January 2010 this adjustment has no impact on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 31 January 2009 and so it has not been
presented in these accounts.
Basis of consolidation
I. Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. Control exists when the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so
as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that are presently exercisable are taken into account.
The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that
control ceases. Non-controlling interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the equity attributable to holders of the
parent. Non-controlling interests consist of the amount of those interests at the date that control commences and the attributable share of changes in equity
subsequent to that date.
II. Joint ventures
Joint ventures are entities over which the Group has joint control based on a contractual arrangement. The results and assets and liabilities of joint ventures
are incorporated in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting. Investments in joint ventures are carried in the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at cost and adjusted for post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of the net assets. Losses of the joint
venture in excess of the Group’s interest in it are not recognised.
III. Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intragroup balances, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intragroup transactions, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated
financial statements.
Property, plant and equipment
I. Owned assets
Items of property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Where parts of an item of property, plant
and equipment have different useful economic lives, they are accounted for as separate items.
II. Leased assets
Assets funded through finance leases and similar hire purchase contracts are capitalised as property, plant and equipment where the Group assumes
substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership. Upon initial recognition, the leased asset is measured at the lower of its fair value and the present
value of the minimum lease payments. Future instalments under such leases, net of financing costs, are included within interest-bearing loans and
borrowings. Rental payments are apportioned between the finance element, which is included in finance costs, and the capital element which reduces the
outstanding obligation for future instalments so as to give a constant charge on the outstanding obligation.
All other leases are accounted for as operating leases and the rental costs are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement on a straight line basis over
the life of the lease.
Legal fees and other costs associated with the acquisition of a leasehold interest are capitalised within non-current other assets. These costs are amortised
over the life of the lease.
Lease incentives are credited to the Consolidated Income Statement on a straight line basis over the life of the lease.
III. Depreciation
Depreciation is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement over the estimated useful life of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment.
The estimated useful economic lives are as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
Freehold land
not depreciated
Long leasehold properties
2% per annum on a straight line basis
Improvements to short leasehold properties
life of lease on a straight line basis
Computer equipment
Fixtures and fittings
3 - 4 years on a straight line basis
5 - 7 years, or length of lease if shorter, on a straight line basis
• Motor vehicles
25% per annum on a reducing balance basis
61
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
1. Significant accounting policies (continued)
Investment property
Investment property, which is property held to earn rentals, is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Investment property is
depreciated over a period of 50 years on a straight-line basis, with the exception of freehold land, which is not depreciated. The Group has elected not to revalue
investment property annually but to disclose the fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The fair value is based on an external valuation prepared by persons having the appropriate professional qualification and experience.
Intangible assets
I. Goodwill
All business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. Goodwill represents amounts arising on acquisition of subsidiaries.
For acquisitions on or after 31 January 2010, the Group measures goodwill at the acquisition date as:
• the fair value of the consideration transferred; plus
• the recognised amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree; plus
• if the business combination is achieved in stages, the fair value of the existing equity interest in the acquiree; less
• the net recognised amount of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
When the excess is negative, negative goodwill is recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.
In respect of business acquisitions that occurred from 1 February 2004 to 30 January 2010, goodwill represents the difference between the cost of the
acquisition and the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquiree. When the excess was negative (negative
goodwill), it was recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement as an exceptional item.
In respect of acquisitions prior to 1 February 2004, goodwill is included on the basis of its deemed cost, which represents the amount recorded under
previous GAAP. The classification and accounting treatment of business combinations that occurred prior to 1 February 2004 has not been reconsidered in
preparing the Group’s opening adopted IFRS balance sheet at 1 February 2004.
Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units (‘CGUs’) and is tested annually for
impairment. The CGUs used are the store portfolios and distribution companies acquired. The recoverable amount is compared to the carrying amount of
the CGU including goodwill. The recoverable amount of a CGU is determined based on value-in-use calculations.
II. Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets represent brand licences, brand names and purchased fascia names.
Brand licences are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation of brand licences is charged to the Consolidated
Income Statement over the term to the licence expiry on a straight line basis.
Brand names acquired are initially stated at fair value less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. The useful economic life of each purchased
brand name is considered to be finite. Amortisation of brand names is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement over their useful life on a straight
line basis.
Separately identifiable fascia names acquired are initially stated at fair value less accumulated impairment losses. The useful economic life of each
purchased fascia name is considered separately. Where the Directors believe that there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is
expected to generate a net cash flow, the specific fascia name is not amortised but is subject to annual impairment reviews.
Investments in subsidiary undertakings and joint ventures
In the Company’s accounts all investments in subsidiary undertakings and joint ventures are stated at cost less provisions for impairment losses.
Changes in ownership interest without a loss of control
In accordance with IAS 27 ‘Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements’ (2008), upon a change in ownership interest in a subsidiary without a loss of
control, the carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests are adjusted to reflect the changes in their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any
difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received is recognised directly
in equity and attributed to the owners of the parent. Acquisitions of non-controlling interests are therefore accounted for as transactions with owners in their
capacity as owners and no goodwill is recognised as a result of such transactions. Associated transaction costs are accounted for within equity.
Available for sale investments
Available for sale investments comprise investments in listed equity shares that are traded in an active market. Available for sale financial assets are measured
at fair value with fair value gains or losses recognised directly in equity through the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and recycled into the
Consolidated Income Statement on sale or impairment of the asset. A significant or prolonged decline in market value is deemed to be objective evidence of
impairment. At this point, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in equity is recognised in profit or loss for the period. Transaction costs that are
directly attributable to the acquisition of available for sale investments are added to the fair value on initial recognition.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is based on the weighted average principle. Provisions are made for obsolescence,
mark downs and shrinkage.
Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the Group’s Statement of Financial Position when the Group becomes a party to the contractual
provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial assets expire or are transferred.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expires.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised at amortised cost less impairment losses. A provision for the impairment of trade receivables is established when there is
objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor,
probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganisation and default or delinquency in payments are considered indicators that the trade
receivable is impaired. The movement in the provision is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
62
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
1. Significant accounting policies (continued)
Non-current other assets
I. Key money
Monies paid in certain countries to give access to retail locations are capitalised within non-current assets. These assets are not depreciated but will be
impaired if evidence exists that the market value is less than the historic cost. Gains/losses on key money from the subsequent disposal of these retail
locations are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
II. Deposits
Money paid in certain countries as deposits to store landlords as protection against non-payment of rent, is capitalised within non-current assets.
A provision for the impairment of these deposits is established when there is objective evidence that the landlord will not repay the deposit in full.
III. Legal fees
Legal fees and other costs associated with the acquisition of a leasehold interest are capitalised within non-current other assets and amortised over the life
of the lease.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits with an original maturity of three months or less. Bank overdrafts are included as a component of
cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, as these are used as an integral part of the Group’s cash management.
Net cash/interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Net cash consists of cash and cash equivalents together with other borrowings from bank loans and overdrafts, other loans, loan notes, finance leases and
similar hire purchase contracts.
Interest-bearing borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less attributable transaction costs. Following the initial recognition, interest-bearing borrowings
are stated at amortised cost with any difference between cost and redemption value being recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement over the period of
the borrowings on an effective interest basis.
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are non-interest-bearing and are stated at their cost.
Foreign currency translation
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rate of exchange at the reporting date. Exchange differences in monetary items are
recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate at the date of
the transaction.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the Group’s overseas operations are translated into sterling at the rate of exchange at the reporting date. Income
and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the accounting period. Foreign currency differences are recognised in Other Comprehensive
Income and are presented in the foreign currency translation reserve.
Derivative financial instruments
The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange and interest rate risks arising from operational, financing and
investment activities. In accordance with its treasury policy, the Group does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. However,
derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are accounted for as trading instruments.
Derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value and remeasured at each period end. The gain or loss on remeasurement to fair value is
recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement. However, where derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, recognition of any resultant gain or
loss depends on the nature of the item being hedged.
Interest rate swaps are recognised at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position with movements in fair value recognised in the Consolidated
Income Statement for the period. The fair value of interest rate swaps is the estimated amount that the Group would receive or pay to terminate the swap at the
reporting date, taking into account current interest rates and the respective risk profiles of the swap counterparties.
Put options held by non-controlling interests
The Group recognises put options over non-controlling interests in its subsidiary undertakings as a liability in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at
the present value of the estimated exercise price of the put option. Upon initial recognition, and for subsequent changes on remeasurement of the liability, a
corresponding entry is made to other equity.
Hedging of monetary assets and liabilities
Where a derivative financial instrument is used to hedge the foreign exchange exposure of a recognised monetary asset or liability, no hedge accounting is
applied and any gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Provisions
A provision is recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past
event, it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the obligation can be estimated reliably.
Within the onerous lease provision, management have provided against the minimum contractual lease cost less potential sublease income for vacant stores.
For loss making trading stores, provision is made to the extent that the lease is deemed to be onerous.
Within the onerous contracts provision, management make provisions where the expected benefits to be derived from a contract are lower than the unavoidable
cost of meeting the obligations under that contract.
Revenue
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and represents amounts receivable for goods and services provided in the
normal course of business, net of discounts and sales related taxes.
In the case of goods sold through the retail stores and trading websites, revenue is recognised when goods are sold and the title has passed, less provision for returns.
Accumulated experience is used to estimate and provide for such returns at the time of the sale. Retail sales are usually in cash, by debit card or by credit card.
In the case of goods sold through the distribution businesses, revenue is recognised when goods are sold and the title has passed less a provision for credit
notes. Distribution sales are either settled by cash received in advance of the goods being dispatched or made on agreed credit terms.
63
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
1. Significant accounting policies (continued)
Exceptional items
Items that are, in aggregate, material in size and unusual or infrequent in nature, are included within operating profit and disclosed separately as exceptional
items in the Consolidated Income Statement.
The separate reporting of exceptional items, which are presented as exceptional within the relevant category in the Consolidated Income Statement, helps
provide an indication of the Group’s underlying business performance. The principal items which will be included as exceptional items are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Loss/(profit) on the disposal of non-current assets
Provision for rentals on onerous property leases
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
Impairment of non-current other assets
Impairment of intangible assets
Impairment of available for sale investments
Impairment of investment property
Loss/(profit) on disposal of available for sale investments
Negative goodwill
Financial income
Financial income comprises interest receivable on funds invested. Financial income is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement on an effective
interest method.
Financial expenses
Financial expenses comprise interest payable on interest-bearing loans and borrowings. Financial expenses are recognised in the Consolidated Income
Statement on an effective interest method.
Income tax expense
Tax on the profit or loss for the year comprises current and deferred tax.
I. Current income tax
Current income tax expense is calculated using the tax rates which have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date, adjusted for any tax
paid in respect of prior years.
II. Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and
the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary differences are not provided for:
• Goodwill not deductible for tax purposes
•
•
The initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit
Differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted
or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilised.
Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
Impairment
The carrying amounts of the Group’s assets other than inventories and deferred tax assets are reviewed annually to determine whether there is any indication of
impairment. An impairment review is performed on individual cash-generating units (‘CGUs’). A CGU for the purposes of property, plant and equipment impairment
reviews is an individual store or a collection of stores where the cash flows are not independent. In respect of goodwill, the cash-generating units used to monitor
goodwill and test for impairment are the store portfolios and distribution companies acquired. If any such impairment exists then the asset’s recoverable amount
is estimated. Impairment losses are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement. Impairment losses in respect of goodwill are not reversed.
Pensions
The Group operates defined contribution pension schemes, the assets of which are held separately from those of the Group in independently administered
funds. Obligations for contributions to the defined contribution schemes are recognised as an expense in the Consolidated Income Statement when incurred.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with adopted IFRSs requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the
application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical
experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements
about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The judgements,
estimates and assumptions which have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities are discussed below:
Impairment of goodwill
Goodwill arising on acquisition is allocated to the cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination from
which goodwill arose. In the case of retail acquisitions, goodwill is allocated to groups of cash-generating units, being portfolios of stores, whereas for
acquisition of distribution businesses, goodwill is allocated to the individual distribution company acquired. The cash-generating units used to monitor
goodwill and test it for impairment are therefore the store portfolios and distribution companies acquired. The recoverable amounts of these cash-generating
units are determined based on value-in-use calculations. The use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows expected to arise from the
continuing operation of the cash-generating unit and the choice of a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value. See note 13 for further
disclosure on impairment of goodwill and review of the key assumptions used.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and non-current other assets
Property, plant and equipment and non-current other assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is not recoverable. The recoverable amount is the greater of the fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use.
Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at each reporting period date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer
exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is
reversed only to the extent that the assets carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would be held (net of depreciation) if no impairment
had been realised.
I.
II.
64
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
1. Significant accounting policies (continued)
Critical accounting estimates and judgements (continued)
III.
IV.
Impairment of other intangible assets with definite lives
The Group is required to test whether other intangible assets with a definite useful economic life have suffered any impairment. The recoverable amount of
brand names is based on an estimation of future sales and the choice of a suitable royalty and discount rate in order to calculate the present value. The
recoverable amount of brand licences is based on an estimation of future sales and other specific cash flows, the contracted royalty rate and the choice of a
suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value. Note 13 provides further disclosure on impairment of other intangible assets with definite lives,
including review of the key assumptions used.
Impairment of other intangible assets with infinite lives
The Group is required to test whether other intangible assets with an infinite useful economic life have suffered any impairment. The recoverable amount of
these assets is determined based on value-in-use calculations. The use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows expected to arise from
the continuing operation of the cash-generating unit and the choice of a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value. Note 13 provides
further detail of the judgements made by the Board in determining that the lives of acquired fascia names are infinite and further disclosure on impairment
of other intangible assets with infinite lives, including review of the key assumptions used.
V. Provisions to write inventories down to net realisable value
The Group makes provisions for obsolescence, mark downs and shrinkage based on historical experiences and management estimates of future events.
VI. Onerous property lease provisions
The Group makes a provision for onerous property leases on specific stores based on the anticipated future cash outflows relating to the contractual lease
cost less potential sublease income. The estimation of sublease income is based on historical experience and knowledge of the retail property market in the
area around each specific property. Significant assumptions and judgements are used in making these estimates and changes in assumptions and future
events could cause the value of these provisions to change. This would include sublet premises becoming vacant, the liquidation of an assignee resulting in
a property reverting to the Group or closing an uneconomic store and subletting at below contracted rent.
VII. Onerous contract provisions
The Group makes a provision for specific onerous contracts where there is a shortfall between the anticipated revenues and costs pertaining to those
contracts. Significant assumptions and judgements are used in making these estimates, and changes in assumptions and future events could cause the
value of these provisions to change.
VIII. Value of put options held by non-controlling interests
The Group recognises put options over non-controlling interests in its subsidiary undertakings as a liability in the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position at the present value of the estimated exercise price of the put option. The present value of the non-controlling interests’ put options are estimated
based on expected earnings in Board-approved forecasts and the choice of a suitable discount rate (see note 25).
IX. Estimation of useful economic lives of brand names
The Group amortises brand names over their useful economic life. In determining the useful economic life of each brand name, the Board considers the
market position of the brands acquired, the nature of the market that the brands operate in, typical product life cycles of brands and the useful economic
lives of similar assets that are used in comparable ways.
X. Determination of fair value of assets and liabilities on acquisition
For each acquisition, the Group reviews the appropriateness of the book values of the assets and liabilities acquired, taking into account the application of
Group accounting policies, to determine if fair value adjustments are required. The key judgements involved are the identification and valuation of intangible
assets which require the estimation of future cash flows and the selection of a suitable discount rate.
2. Segmental analysis
IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ requires the Group’s segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about components of the Group that are regularly
reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker to allocate resources to the segments and to assess their performance. The Chief Operating Decision Maker is
considered to be the Executive Chairman of JD Sports Fashion Plc.
Information reported to the Chief Operating Decision Maker is focused on the nature of the businesses within the Group. The Group’s reportable segments
under IFRS 8 are therefore as follows:
•
•
•
Sport retail - includes the results of the sport retail trading companies JD Sports Fashion Plc, John David Sports Fashion (Ireland) Limited, Chausport SA
and Duffer of St George Limited
Fashion retail - includes the results of the fashion retail trading companies Bank Fashion Limited and RD Scott Limited
Distribution businesses - includes the results of the distribution companies Topgrade Sportswear Limited, Nicholas Deakins Limited, Canterbury Limited
(including global subsidiary companies), Kooga Rugby Limited and Nanny State Limited
The Chief Operating Decision Maker receives and reviews segmental operating profit. Certain central administrative costs including Group Directors’ salaries are
included within the Group’s core ‘Sport retail’ result. This is consistent with the results as reported to the Chief Operating Decision Maker.
IFRS 8 requires disclosure of information regarding revenue from major products and customers. The majority of the Group’s revenue is derived from the retail of
a wide range of apparel, footwear and accessories to the general public. As such, the disclosure of revenues from major products and customers is not
appropriate.
Intersegment transactions are undertaken in the ordinary course of business on arms length terms.
The Board consider that certain items are cross divisional in nature and cannot be allocated between the segments on a meaningful basis. The share of results
of joint venture is presented as unallocated in the following tables, as this entity has trading relationships with companies in all of the three segments. An asset
of £3,458,000 (2010: £635,000) for the equity accounted investment in joint venture is included within the unallocated segment. Net funding costs and taxation
are treated as unallocated reflecting the nature of the Group’s syndicated borrowing facilities and its tax group. A deferred tax asset of £125,000 (2010: liability of
£748,000) and an income tax liability of £12,370,000 (2010: £10,789,000) are included within the unallocated segment.
Each segment is shown net of intercompany transactions and balances within that segment. The eliminations remove intercompany transactions and balances
between different segments which primarily relate to the net down of long term loans and short term working capital funding provided by JD Sports Fashion Plc
(within Sport retail) to other companies in the Group, and intercompany trading between companies in different segments.
65
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
2. Segmental analysis (continued)
Business segments
Information regarding the Group’s reportable operating segments for the 52 weeks to 29 January 2011 is shown below:
Income statement
Gross revenue
Intersegment revenue
Revenue
Operating profit before exceptional items
Exceptional items
Operating profit
Share of results of joint venture
Financial income
Financial expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the period
Total assets and liabilities
Total assets
Total liabilities
Sport
retail
£000
Fashion
retail
£000
Distribution
£000
Total
£000
667,224
134,110
(1,290)
(162)
85,498
(1,711)
886,832
(3,163)
665,934
133,948
83,787
883,669
73,340
(2,687)
6,399
(1,573)
70,653
4,826
188
(24)
164
79,927
(4,284)
75,643
2,823
618
(455)
78,629
(22,762)
55,867
Sport
retail
£000
Fashion
retail
£000
Distribution
£000
Unallocated
£000
Eliminations
£000
Total
£000
310,244
56,182
50,822
3,583
(53,040)
367,791
(120,727)
(51,546)
(51,013)
(12,370)
53,040
(182,616)
Total segment net assets/(liabilities)
189,517
4,636
(191)
(8,787)
-
185,175
Other segment information
Capital expenditure:
Brand licence purchased
Brand names purchased
Property, plant and equipment
Non-current other assets
Depreciation, amortisation and impairments:
Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets
Impairment of investment property
Sport
retail
£000
Fashion
retail
£000
Distribution
£000
Total
£000
7,500
1,710
23,553
2,092
-
-
6,656
22
-
350
646
-
7,500
2,060
30,855
2,114
15,679
1,007
3,454
-
1,242
-
20,375
1,007
66
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
2. Segmental analysis (continued)
Business segments (continued)
The comparative segmental results for the 52 weeks to 30 January 2010 are as follows:
Income statement
Gross revenue
Intersegment revenue
Revenue
Operating profit/(loss) before exceptional items
Exceptional items
Operating profit/(loss)
Share of results of joint venture
Financial income
Financial expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the period
Total assets and liabilities
Total assets
Total liabilities
Sport
retail
£000
Fashion
retail
£000
Distribution
£000
Total
£000
615,507
114,640
(1,225)
(394)
42,551
(1,294)
772,698
(2,913)
614,282
114,246
41,257
769,785
64,125
(642)
3,333
(4,355)
(164)
11
67,294
(4,986)
63,483
(1,022)
(153)
62,308
(473)
385
(827)
61,393
(18,647)
42,746
Sport
retail
£000
Fashion
retail
£000
Distribution
£000
Unallocated
£000
Eliminations
£000
Total
£000
264,394
51,180
40,572
635
(50,556)
306,225
(112,618)
(51,561)
(40,543)
(11,537)
50,556
(165,703)
Total segment net assets/(liabilities)
151,776
(381)
29
(10,902)
-
140,522
Other segment information
Capital expenditure:
Goodwill on acquisition (restated - see note 1)
Brand names on acquisition
Brand names purchased
Property, plant and equipment
Non-current other assets
Available for sale investment
Depreciation, amortisation and impairments:
Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets
Impairment of intangible assets
Impairment of non-current assets
Sport
retail
£000
Fashion
retail
£000
Distribution
£000
Total
£000
-
2,042
-
13,517
1,424
9,990
14,067
-
105
-
-
-
7,383
5
-
3,279
2,617
303
1,537
453
6,672
572
-
-
517
-
-
1,537
2,495
6,672
21,472
1,429
9,990
17,863
2,617
408
67
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
2. Segmental analysis (continued)
Geographical information
The Group’s operations are located in the UK, Republic of Ireland, France, Australia, New Zealand, United States of America and Hong Kong.
The following table provides analysis of the Group’s revenue by geographical market, irrespective of the origin of the goods/services:
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
Revenue
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
UK
Europe
Rest of world
801,728
55,027
26,914
722,221
45,094
2,470
883,669
769,785
The revenue from any individual country, with the exception of the UK, is not more than 10% of the Group’s total revenue.
The following is an analysis of the carrying amount of segmental non-current assets, excluding the investment in joint venture of £3,458,000 (2010: £635,000),
deferred tax assets of £125,000 (2010: £nil) and other financial assets of £nil (2010: £922,000), by the geographical area in which the assets are located:
Non-current assets
UK
Europe
Rest of world
3. Profit before tax
Profit before tax is stated after charging:
Auditor’s remuneration:
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Company’s annual accounts
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor and its associates for other services:
The audit of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation
Other services pursuant to legislation
Tax services
All other services
Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets:
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment - owned
Depreciation of investment property - owned
Amortisation of intangible assets
Amortisation of non-current other assets - owned
Impairments of non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets (see note 4)
Investment property (see note 4)
Other non-current assets
Rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases for:
Land and buildings
Other - plant and equipment
Provision to write down inventories to net realisable value
Foreign exchange loss recognised
Profit before tax is stated after crediting:
Rents receivable and other income from property
Sundry income
Foreign exchange gain recognised
2011
£000
135,852
16,362
268
2010
(restated -
see note 1)
£000
120,416
13,311
285
152,482
134,012
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
117
249
38
94
11
18,338
46
1,460
531
-
-
1,007
-
80,632
1,716
1,627
(568)
682
1,495
-
106
196
30
108
11
16,660
49
762
392
407
2,617
-
1
75,751
1,459
827
-
892
1,378
572
In addition, fees of £30,000 (2010: £25,000) were incurred and paid by Pentland Group Plc (see note 36) in relation to the non-coterminous audit of the Group for
the purpose of inclusion in their consolidated financial statements.
Non-current other assets comprise key money, store deposits and legal fees associated with the acquisition of leasehold interests (see note 16).
68
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
4. Exceptional items
Loss on disposal of non-current assets (1)
Impairment of non-current assets (2)
Onerous lease provision (3)
Selling and distribution expenses - exceptional
Impairment of intangible assets (4)
Impairment of investment property (5)
Profit on disposal of available for sale investments (6)
Administrative expenses - exceptional
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
Note
26
13
15
19
1,440
-
1,837
3,277
-
1,007
-
1,007
4,284
2,148
408
3,902
6,458
2,617
-
(4,089)
(1,472)
4,986
(1) Relates to the excess of net book value of property, plant and equipment and non-current other assets disposed over proceeds received
(2)
Relates to property, plant and equipment and non-current other assets in cash-generating units which are loss making, where it is considered that this
position cannot be recovered
(3)
Relates to the net movement in the provision for onerous property leases on trading and non-trading stores (see note 26)
(4)
Relates to the impairment in the period to 30 January 2010 of the residual goodwill on the acquisition of the entire issued share capital of RD Scott Limited
(see note 13)
(5) Relates to the impairment in the period to 29 January 2011 of investment property (see note 15)
(6)
The Group held a non-strategic investment in JJB Sports Plc until 9 December 2009 when it disposed of 65,018,098 ordinary shares for 25p per share,
giving a realised loss on disposal of £1,988,000. After recognising an impairment of £6,077,000 in the year ended 31 January 2009 this resulted in an
exceptional gain in the period to 30 January 2010 of £4,089,000 (see note 19)
5. Remuneration of Directors
Directors’ emoluments:
As Non-Executive Directors
As Executive Directors
Pension contributions
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
90
3,381
47
3,518
66
3,009
44
3,119
The remuneration of the Executive Directors includes retention payments totalling £nil (2010: £500,000) and provision for future LTIP payments of £771,000
(2010: £708,000). Further information on Directors’ emoluments is shown in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 45.
69
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
6. Staff numbers and costs
Group
The average number of persons employed by the Group (including Directors) during the period, analysed by category, was as follows:
GROUP
Sales and distribution
Administration
Full time equivalents
The aggregate payroll costs of these persons were as follows:
GROUP
Wages and salaries
Social security costs
Other pension costs (see note 31)
2011
10,906
325
11,231
6,759
2010
10,081
253
10,334
6,128
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
122,946
9,711
1,201
107,464
8,010
809
133,858
116,283
In the opinion of the Board, the key management as defined under IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ are the six Executive and Non-Executive Directors
(2010: five). Full disclosure of the Directors’ remuneration is given in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 45.
Company
The average number of persons employed by the Company (including Directors) during the period, analysed by category, was as follows:
COMPANY
Sales and distribution
Administration
Full time equivalents
The aggregate payroll costs of these person were as follows:
COMPANY
Wages and salaries
Social security costs
Other pension costs
7. Financial income
Bank interest
Other interest
70
2011
8,185
225
8,410
4,899
2010
7,875
207
8,082
4,706
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
85,913
5,911
484
92,308
80,718
5,372
449
86,539
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
579
39
618
240
145
385
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
8. Financial expenses
On bank loans and overdrafts
Amortisation of facility costs
Other interest
9.
Income tax expense
Current tax
UK corporation tax at 28.0% (2010: 28.0%)
Adjustment relating to prior periods
Total current tax charge
Deferred tax
Deferred tax (origination and reversal of temporary differences)
Adjustment relating to prior periods
Total deferred tax (credit)/charge (see note 27)
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
380
-
75
455
511
160
156
827
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
23,250
385
23,635
52
(925)
(873)
18,125
148
18,273
254
120
374
Income tax expense
22,762
18,647
Reconciliation of income tax expense
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
Profit before tax multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 28.0% (2010: 28.0%)
22,016
17,190
Effects of:
Expenses not deductible
Depreciation and impairment of non-qualifying non-current assets (including brand names
arising on consolidation)
Impairment of investment property
Loss on disposal of non-qualifying non-current assets
Reversal of non-qualifying impairment of available for sale investments
Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions
(Profit)/loss from joint venture - after tax result included
Non-qualifying impairment of goodwill on consolidation
Recognition of previously unrecognised tax losses
Other differences
Reduction in tax rate
Change in unrecognised temporary differences
(Over)/under provided in prior periods
845
1,056
282
77
-
35
(790)
-
(43)
-
(23)
(153)
(540)
259
936
-
267
(1,145)
(48)
132
733
(95)
150
-
-
268
Income tax expense
22,762
18,647
71
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
10. Earnings per ordinary share
Basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share at 29 January 2011 is based on the profit for the period attributable to equity holders of the
parent of £55,884,000 (2010: £42,900,000) and a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2011 of
48,661,658 (2010: 48,661,658).
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
Issued ordinary shares at beginning and end of period
48,661,658
48,661,658
Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share
Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share have been based on the profit for the period attributable to equity holders of the parent for each
financial period but excluding the post-tax effect of certain exceptional items. The Directors consider that this gives a more meaningful measure of the
underlying performance of the Group.
Profit for the period attributable to equity holders of the parent
Exceptional items excluding loss on disposal of non-current assets
Tax relating to exceptional items
Share of exceptional items of joint venture (net of income tax)
Profit for the period attributable to equity holders of the parent excluding exceptional items
Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share
11. Acquisitions
Current period acquisitions
Note
4
17
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
55,884
2,844
(514)
(1,348)
56,866
116.86p
42,900
2,838
(1,184)
1,012
45,566
93.64p
Acquisition of non-controlling interest in Topgrade Sportswear Limited
On 21 June 2010, the Group acquired a further 29% of the issued share capital of Hallco 1521 Limited (the intermediate holding company of Topgrade
Sportswear Limited) for a cash consideration of £1,200,000. This takes the Group’s holding to 80%. The Group’s original share of 51% was acquired on 7
November 2007. Topgrade Sportswear Limited is a distributor and multichannel retailer of sports and fashion clothing and footwear. As the Group already had
control of Hallco 1521 Limited, the increase in Group ownership has been accounted for as an equity transaction.
Nanny State Limited
On 4 August 2010, the Group (via its new subsidiary Nanny State Limited) acquired the global rights to the fashion footwear and apparel brand, ‘Nanny State’,
from D.R.I.P Brands Limited (in administration) and D.R. Shoes Limited (in administration) for a cash consideration of £350,000. Inventory with a value of
£141,000 and other debtors with a value of £86,000 were also acquired. The book value of the assets acquired is considered to be the fair value.
Included in the result for the 52 week period to 29 January 2011 is revenue of £771,000 and a loss before tax of £15,000 in respect of Nanny State Limited.
72
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
11. Acquisitions (continued)
Prior period acquisitions
Acquisition of Kooga Rugby Limited
On 3 July 2009, the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Kooga Rugby Limited for a consideration of £1 together with associated fees of
£30,000. Kooga Rugby Limited is involved in the design, sourcing and wholesale of rugby apparel, footwear and accessories and is sole kit supplier to a number
of professional rugby union and rugby league clubs.
During the 12 month period following acquisition, certain measurement adjustments have been made to the provisional fair values of the net liabilities of Kooga
Rugby Limited as at the acquisition date in accordance with IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’. The adjustments from 1 August 2009 to 30 January 2010 are
shown in the Annual Report and Accounts 2010. The adjustments from 31 January 2010 to determine the final fair value of liabilities acquired are shown below:
Acquiree’s net liabilities at the acquisition date:
Intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Net identifiable liabilities
Goodwill on acquisition
Consideration paid - satisfied in cash
Provisional fair
value at
30 January 2010
£000
Fair value
adjustments
£000
Fair value at
29 January 2011
£000
453
102
1,082
1,018
(1,449)
(2,035)
(584)
(1,413)
1,443
30
-
-
(94)
-
-
-
-
(94)
94
-
453
102
988
1,018
(1,449)
(2,035)
(584)
(1,507)
1,537
30
Acquisition of Chausport SA
On 19 May 2009, the Group (via its new subsidiary JD Sports Fashion (France) SAS) acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Chausport SA for a cash
consideration of £7,211,000 (€8,000,000) together with associated fees of £696,000. Chausport SA is a French retailer, which at the time of acquisition had 78
stores in premium locations in town centres and shopping centres across France.
During the 12 month period following acquisition, no measurement adjustments were made to the provisional fair values of the net assets of Chausport SA as at
the acquisition date.
Provisional fair
value at
30 January 2010
£000
Fair value
adjustments
£000
Fair value at
29 January 2011
£000
Acquiree's net assets at the acquisition date:
Property, plant and equipment
Non-current other assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Trade and other payables
Net identifiable assets
Goodwill on acquisition
Consideration paid - satisfied in cash
1,558
9,278
5,770
1,350
639
(2,318)
(8,370)
7,907
-
7,907
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,558
9,278
5,770
1,350
639
(2,318)
(8,370)
7,907
-
7,907
73
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
11. Acquisitions (continued)
Canterbury Limited
On 4 August 2009, the Group (via its new subsidiary Canterbury Limited) acquired the global rights to the rugby brands ‘Canterbury’ and ‘Canterbury of New
Zealand’ from Canterbury Europe Limited (in administration) for a cash consideration of £6,672,000. Inventory with a fair value of £4,289,000 was also acquired.
The book value of the assets acquired was considered to be the fair value and no goodwill arose on the acquisition.
The final fair value of the net assets acquired was £10,961,000. During the 12 month period following acquisition, no measurement adjustments have been
made to the provisional fair values of the net assets of Canterbury Limited as at the acquisition date.
Canterbury International (Far East) Limited
On 4 August 2009, Canterbury Limited acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Canterbury International (Far East) Limited for a cash consideration of £1.
The provisional fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired was £1. No goodwill arose on this acquisition.
The final fair value of the net assets acquired was £1. During the 12 month period following acquisition, no measurement adjustments have been made to the
provisional fair values of the net assets of Canterbury International (Far East) Limited as at the acquisition date.
Canterbury (North America) LLC
On 24 November 2009, Canterbury Limited (via its new subsidiary Canterbury (North America) LLC) acquired the key trading assets from Sail City Apparel
Limited (in liquidation). The total cash consideration paid was £442,000 which included inventory with a value of £392,000 with associated fees of £50,000.
The book value of the assets acquired was considered to be the fair value and no goodwill arose on the acquisition.
The final fair value of the net assets acquired was £442,000. During the 12 month period following acquisition, no measurement adjustments have been made to
the provisional fair values of the net assets of Canterbury (North America) LLC as at the acquisition date.
Acquisition of Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited
On 23 December 2009, Canterbury Limited acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited for a cash
consideration of £2 together with associated fees of £100,000. Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited operates the Canterbury brand in Australia.
During the 12 month period following acquisition, no measurement adjustments have been made to the provisional fair values of the net assets of Canterbury
International (Australia) Pty Limited as at the acquisition date.
Acquiree's net assets at the acquisition date:
Property, plant and equipment
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other payables
Intercompany loan
Net identifiable assets
Goodwill on acquisition
Consideration paid - satisfied in cash
Provisional fair
value at
30 January 2010
£000
Fair value
adjustments
£000
Fair value at
29 January 2011
£000
144
1,866
1,175
918
(3,386)
(617)
100
-
100
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
144
1,866
1,175
918
(3,386)
(617)
100
-
100
Acquisition of Canterbury of New Zealand Limited
On 23 December 2009, Canterbury Limited acquired 51% of the issued share capital of Canterbury of New Zealand Limited for a cash consideration of £1
together with associated fees of £200,000. Canterbury of New Zealand Limited operates the Canterbury brand in New Zealand.
During the 12 month period following acquisition, no measurement adjustments have been made to the provisional fair values of the net assets of Canterbury of
New Zealand Limited as at the acquisition date.
Acquiree's net assets at acquisition date:
Property, plant and equipment
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other payables
Income tax liabilities
Intercompany loan
Shareholder loan
Net identifiable assets
Non-controlling interest (49%)
Goodwill on acquisition
Consideration paid - satisfied in cash
74
Provisional fair
value at
30 January 2010
£000
Fair value
adjustments
£000
Fair value at
29 January 2011
£000
123
1,501
1,256
504
(1,450)
(8)
(771)
(763)
392
(192)
-
200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
123
1,501
1,256
504
(1,450)
(8)
(771)
(763)
392
(192)
-
200
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
11. Acquisitions (continued)
Acquisition of Duffer of St George Limited
On 24 November 2009, the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Duffer of St George Limited for a cash consideration of £863,000.
Duffer of St George Limited owns the global rights to the brand name ‘The Duffer of St George’.
During the 12 month period following acquisition, no measurement adjustments have been made to the provisional fair values of the net assets of Duffer of St
George Limited as at the acquisition date.
Acquiree's net assets at the acquisition date:
Intangible assets
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Deferred tax asset
Net identifiable assets
Goodwill on acquisition
Consideration paid - satisfied in cash
12. Disposals
Provisional fair
value at
30 January 2010
£000
Fair value
adjustments
£000
Fair value at
29 January 2011
£000
2,042
220
212
(1,616)
5
863
-
863
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,042
220
212
(1,616)
5
863
-
863
Disposal of 25% of issued ordinary share capital of Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited
On 28 January 2011, Canterbury Limited disposed of 25% of the issued ordinary share capital of Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited to the local
management team by issuing new shares in exchange for a cash consideration of AUD $1,100,000. This takes the Group’s shareholding to 75%. As the Group
has maintained control of Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited, the decrease in Group ownership has been accounted for as an equity transaction.
13. Intangible assets
GROUP
Cost or valuation
At 31 January 2009
Acquisitions (restated - see note 1)
At 30 January 2010
Acquisitions
Goodwill
£000
Brand licences
£000
Brand names
£000
Fascia name
£000
40,804
1,537
42,341
-
4,279
-
4,279
7,500
-
9,167
9,167
2,060
At 29 January 2011
42,341
11,779
11,227
Amortisation and impairment
At 31 January 2009
Charge for the period
Impairment
At 30 January 2010
Charge for the period
At 29 January 2011
Net book value
At 29 January 2011
At 30 January 2010
At 31 January 2009
7,252
-
2,617
9,869
-
9,869
422
362
-
784
424
1,208
32,472
10,571
32,472
33,552
3,495
3,857
-
400
-
400
1,036
1,436
9,791
8,767
-
5,481
-
5,481
-
5,481
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,481
5,481
5,481
Total
£000
50,564
10,704
61,268
9,560
70,828
7,674
762
2,617
11,053
1,460
12,513
58,315
50,215
42,890
75
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
13. Intangible assets (continued)
Goodwill impairment
The impairment in the prior period related to the residual goodwill on the acquisition in the year to 29 January 2005 of the entire issued share capital of RD Scott
Limited. An initial impairment of £2,000,000 was recognised in the year to 27 January 2007. Although the performance of the business had improved since this
point, it had not progressed sufficiently to justify carrying the remaining goodwill and so the remaining balance of £2,617,000 was impaired in the year to 30
January 2010.
Brand licences
Brand licences comprise the following:
I.
Fila brand licence
On 20 January 2011, the Group acquired a 10 year licence for the exclusive use of the Fila brand in the UK and Republic of Ireland for a cash consideration
of £7,500,000. This amount is being amortised on a straight line basis over the licence period. Amortisation of this intangible is included within cost of sales
in the Consolidated Income Statement.
II. Sergio Tacchini brand licence
The Group has a sub-licence to use the Sergio Tacchini brand in the UK until 2019. The original cost of £4,279,000 is being amortised on a straight line
basis over the licence period. Amortisation of this intangible is included within cost of sales in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Brand names
Brand names comprise the following:
I. Sonneti brand name
On 26 April 2010, the Group acquired the global rights to the fashion brand name, ‘Sonneti’, for £1,520,000. This brand name is being amortised over a
period of 10 years and the amortisation charge is included within administrative expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement. At 29 January 2011 the
net book value of this brand was £1,444,000.
II. Chilli Pepper brand name
On 18 June 2010, the Group acquired the European rights to the fashion brand name, ‘Chilli Pepper’, for £190,000. This brand name is being amortised
over a period of 10 years and the amortisation charge is included within administrative expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement. At 29 January
2011 the net book value of this brand was £181,000.
III. Nanny State brand name
On 4 August 2010, the Group acquired the global rights to the fashion footwear and apparel brand name, ‘Nanny State’, for £350,000. This brand name is
being amortised over a period of 10 years and the amortisation charge is included within administrative expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement.
At 29 January 2011 the net book value of this brand was £333,000.
IV. Canterbury brand name
In the prior year, the Group acquired the global rights to the rugby brands ‘Canterbury’ and ‘Canterbury of New Zealand’ for £6,672,000. This brand name is
being amortised over a period of 10 years and the amortisation charge is included within administrative expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement.
At 29 January 2011 the net book value of this brand was £5,672,000 (2010: £6,339,000).
V. Kooga brand name
In the prior year, as part of the acquisition of Kooga Rugby Limited, the Group acquired the global rights (excluding Australia and the Pacific Islands) to the ‘Kooga’
brand name. This brand name was valued at £453,000 and is being amortised over a period of 10 years, with the amortisation charge included within
administrative expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement. At 29 January 2011 the net book value of this brand was £382,000 (2010: £427,000).
VI. Duffer of St George brand name
In the prior year, as part of the acquisition of Duffer of St George Limited, the Group acquired the global rights to the brand name ‘The Duffer of St George’.
This brand name was valued at £2,042,000 and is being amortised over a period of 10 years, with the amortisation charge included within administrative
expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement. At 29 January 2011 the net book value of this brand was £1,779,000 (2010: £2,001,000).
Fascia name
The fascia name of £5,481,000 represents the fair value of the ‘Bank’ fascia name acquired as part of the acquisition of Bank Stores Holdings Limited and its
subsidiaries during the period ended 2 February 2008. The ‘Bank’ fascia name is not being amortised as management consider this asset to have an infinite
useful economic life. Factors considered by the Board in determining that the useful life of the Bank fascia name is infinite include:
•
•
•
The strength of the Bank fascia name in the branded fashion sector as demonstrated by increased revenues and levels of operating profit
The history of the fascia name and that of similar assets in the retail sector
The commitment of the Group to continue to operate Bank stores separately for the foreseeable future, including the ongoing investment in new stores
and refurbishments
76
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
13. Intangible assets (continued)
COMPANY
Cost or valuation
At 31 January 2009 and 30 January 2010
Acquisitions
At 29 January 2011
Amortisation and impairment
At 31 January 2009
Charge for the period
At 30 January 2010
Charge for the period
At 29 January 2011
Net book value
At 29 January 2011
At 30 January 2010
At 31 January 2009
Goodwill
£000
Brand licences
£000
Brand names
£000
19,945
-
4,279
7,500
19,945
11,779
4,045
-
4,045
-
422
362
784
424
4,045
1,208
-
1,710
1,710
-
-
-
85
85
Total
£000
24,224
9,210
33,434
4,467
362
4,829
509
5,338
15,900
10,571
1,625
28,096
15,900
15,900
3,495
3,857
-
-
19,395
19,757
Impairment tests for cash-generating units containing goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to the Group’s cash-generating units (‘CGUs’) and tested annually for impairment. The CGUs used are either the store portfolios or
distribution businesses acquired. The recoverable amount is compared to the carrying amount of the CGU including goodwill.
The recoverable amount of a CGU is determined based on value-in-use calculations. The carrying amount of goodwill by CGU is shown below:
Allsports store portfolio
First Sport store portfolio
Bank store portfolio
Topgrade Sportswear Limited
Nicholas Deakins Limited
Kooga Rugby Limited
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
924
14,976
14,154
17
864
1,537
2010
(restated -
see note 1)
£000
924
14,976
14,154
17
864
1,537
2011
£000
924
14,976
-
-
-
-
2010
£000
924
14,976
-
-
-
-
32,472
32,472
15,900
15,900
The key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations are set out below:
•
•
In relation to the Allsports store portfolio, First Sport store portfolio and Bank store portfolio, the cash flow projections are based on actual operating results,
together with financial forecasts and strategy plans approved by the Board covering a five year period. These forecasts and plans are based on both past
performance and expectations for future market development. Cash flows beyond this five year period are extrapolated using a growth rate of 2.0% (2010:
2.0%) which is an estimate of the growth based on past experience within the Group
In relation to Nicholas Deakins Limited and Kooga Rugby Limited the cash flow projections are based on actual divisional operating results together with
financial forecasts and strategy plans approved by the Board covering a five year period. These forecasts are based on both past performance and
expectations for future development. Cash flows beyond this five year period are extrapolated using a growth rate of 2.0% (2010: 2.0%) which is an estimate
based on past experience
•
The discount rate of 14.9% (2010: 12.7%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks and costs of capital of the Group
77
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
13. Intangible assets (continued)
Impairment tests for intangible assets with infinite lives
Intangible assets with infinite lives are tested annually for impairment by comparing the recoverable amount to their carrying value.
Fascia name
The recoverable amount of the Bank fascia name is determined based on a value-in-use method of valuation. The carrying value of the Bank intangible assets
are compared with the present value of future cash flows generated by the store portfolio. The cash flow projections are based on actual operating results,
together with financial forecasts and strategy plans approved by the Board covering a five year period. These forecasts and plans are based on both past
performance and expectations for future market development. Cash flows beyond this five year period are extrapolated using a growth rate of 2.0% (2010: 2.0%)
which is an estimate of the growth based on past experience within the Group. The discount rate of 14.9% (2010: 12.7%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks
and costs of capital of the Group.
Impairment tests for intangible assets with definite lives
Intangible assets with definite lives are tested annually for impairment by comparing the recoverable amount to their carrying value.
Brand names
The recoverable amount of brand names is determined based on a ‘royalty relief’ method of valuation, which takes projected future sales, applies a royalty rate
to them and discounts the projected future post-tax royalties to arrive at a net present value. The Group has used a pre-tax discount rate of 14.9% (2010: 12.7%)
to reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and risks specific to the assets, for which the future cash flow estimates have not been
adjusted. Projected future sales are based on Board approved forecasts up to five years, and subsequent sales projections assume an annual growth up to
2.0% over the remaining life of the brand names.
Brand licences
The recoverable amount of brand licences is based on an estimation of future sales and other specific cash flows, the contracted royalty rate and the choice of a
suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value. The Group has used a pre-tax discount rate of 14.9% (2010: 12.7%) to reflect the risks specific to
the assets, for which future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted. Projected future sales are based on a three year Board approved forecast. Subsequent
sales projections assume an annual growth of 5.0% for the following two years and then 2.0% over the remaining licence period.
Sensitivity analysis
A sensitivity analysis has been performed on the base case assumptions used for assessing the goodwill.
For the Kooga Rugby Limited cash-generating unit, changes in key assumptions could cause the carrying value of the unit to exceed its recoverable amount.
The Board has considered the possibility of the business achieving less revenue and gross profit than budgeted. Whilst the reduction in revenue would be
partially offset by a reduction in revenue related costs, the Board would also take actions to mitigate the loss of gross profit by reducing other costs.
Should the business have a 1.0% reduction in forecast gross profit and be unable to reduce selling and distribution and administrative costs, the reduction in
value-in-use would lead to an impairment of £445,000.
A reduction from 2.0% to nil in the growth rate, beyond the five year Board approved financial forecast and strategy plan, with no actions taken to change the
cost structure forecast, would lead to an additional impairment of £95,000.
For the Bank goodwill cash-generating unit, changes in key assumptions could cause the carrying value of the unit to exceed its recoverable amount.
The Board has considered the possibility of the business achieving less revenue and gross profit than budgeted. Whilst the reduction in revenue would be
partially offset by a reduction in revenue related costs, the Board would also take actions to mitigate the loss of gross profit by reducing other costs.
Should the business have a 5.0% reduction in forecast revenue and be unable to reduce selling and distribution and administrative costs, the reduction in value-
in-use would lead to an impairment of £1,160,000. All other assumptions remain unchanged.
With regards to the assessment of value-in-use of all other cash-generating units, the Board believe that there are no reasonably possible changes in any of the
key assumptions, which would cause the carrying value of the unit to exceed its recoverable amount.
78
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
14. Property, plant and equipment
GROUP
Cost
At 31 January 2009
Additions
Disposals
Exchange differences
On acquisition of subsidiaries
At 30 January 2010
Additions
Disposals
Exchange differences
At 29 January 2011
Depreciation and impairment
At 31 January 2009
Charge for period
Impairments
Disposals
Exchange differences
At 30 January 2010
Charge for period
Disposals
Exchange differences
At 29 January 2011
Net book value
At 29 January 2011
At 30 January 2010
At 31 January 2009
Improvements to
short leasehold
properties
£000
Land
£000
Computer
equipment
£000
Fixtures and
fittings
£000
Motor
vehicles
£000
-
-
-
-
-
-
942
-
-
942
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
942
-
-
14,938
2,172
(1,145)
48
144
16,157
2,492
(1,504)
59
11,153
1,445
(1,123)
(14)
212
11,673
2,325
(304)
73
109,495
17,823
(8,897)
19
1,571
120,011
24,922
(8,549)
(207)
17,204
13,767
136,177
8,254
1,212
37
(938)
14
8,579
1,890
(1,159)
53
8,255
1,604
11
(1,118)
(10)
8,742
1,870
(285)
69
56,629
13,784
359
(7,508)
(71)
63,193
14,515
(7,109)
(196)
9,363
10,396
70,403
7,841
7,578
6,684
3,371
65,774
2,931
56,818
2,898
52,866
298
32
(200)
-
-
130
174
(124)
7
187
78
60
-
(115)
-
23
63
(94)
3
(5)
192
107
220
Total
£000
135,884
21,472
(11,365)
53
1,927
147,971
30,855
(10,481)
(68)
168,277
73,216
16,660
407
(9,679)
(67)
80,537
18,338
(8,647)
(71)
90,157
78,120
67,434
62,668
Impairment charges of £nil (2010: £407,000) relate to all classes of property, plant and equipment in cash-generating units which are loss making and where it is
considered that the position cannot be recovered as a result of a continuing deterioration in the performance in the particular store. The cash-generating units
represent individual stores, or a collection of stores where the cash flows are not independent, with the loss based on the specific revenue streams and costs
attributable to those cash-generating units. Assets in impaired stores are written down to their recoverable amount which is calculated as the greater of the fair
value less costs to sell and value-in-use.
In the period to 29 January 2011, the addition of land of £942,000 (2010: £nil) relates to the purchase of a plot adjacent to the new Group warehouse, upon
which a new Group head office will be constructed.
79
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
14. Property, plant and equipment (continued)
COMPANY
Cost
At 31 January 2009
Additions
Disposals
At 30 January 2010
Additions
Disposals
At 29 January 2011
Depreciation and impairment
At 31 January 2009
Charge for period
Impairments
Disposals
At 30 January 2010
Charge for period
Disposals
At 29 January 2011
Net book value
At 29 January 2011
At 30 January 2010
Improvements to
short leasehold
properties
£000
Computer
equipment
£000
Fixtures and
fittings
£000
Motor
vehicles
£000
12,580
1,199
(989)
12,790
1,383
(1,184)
9,892
801
(85)
10,608
1,752
(197)
89,275
11,115
(6,520)
93,870
15,042
(5,486)
12,989
12,163
103,426
7,399
935
24
(809)
7,549
1,279
(935)
7,435
1,083
3
(84)
8,437
1,438
(195)
48,929
10,453
76
(5,549)
53,909
10,477
(4,763)
7,893
9,680
59,623
166
7
(15)
158
158
(82)
234
77
22
-
(13)
86
44
(53)
77
Total
£000
111,913
13,122
(7,609)
117,426
18,335
(6,949)
128,812
63,840
12,493
103
(6,455)
69,981
13,238
(5,946)
77,273
5,096
2,483
43,803
157
51,539
5,241
2,171
39,961
72
89
47,445
48,073
At 31 January 2009
5,181
2,457
40,346
80
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
15. Investment property
GROUP AND COMPANY
Cost
At 31 January 2009, 30 January 2010 and 29 January 2011
Depreciation and impairment
At 31 January 2009
Charge for period
At 30 January 2010
Charge for period
Impairment
At 29 January 2011
Net book value
At 29 January 2011
At 30 January 2010
At 31 January 2009
£000
4,160
58
49
107
46
1,007
1,160
3,000
4,053
4,102
Based on an external valuation, the fair value of the investment property as at 29 January 2011 was £3,000,000 (2010: £3,400,000).
Management consider the carrying value of the investment property to be impaired based on value-in-use projections of future rental income. Accordingly,
an impairment loss of £1,007,000 has been recognised in the period to write the asset down to its recoverable amount, which reflects the external valuation
performed (see note 4).
16. Non-current other assets
Loan notes receivable from joint venture
Key money
Deposits
Legal fees
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
-
8,419
779
3,849
2010
£000
922
8,553
659
3,098
13,047
13,232
2011
£000
-
-
-
3,590
3,590
2010
£000
922
-
-
2,865
3,787
The loan notes receivable from the joint venture earned interest at bank base lending rates plus a margin of 1.5%. £923,000 was repaid in the year including
interest accrued of £1,000 since the prior year end (2010: £1,750,000). As at 29 January 2011, the balance had been repaid in full.
Key money represents monies paid in certain countries to give access to retail locations.
Deposits represent money paid in certain countries to store landlords as protection against non-payment of rent.
Legal fees represents legal fees and other costs associated with the acquisition of leasehold interests.
Impairment losses of £nil (2010: £1,000) have been recognised on other assets in specific cash-generating units which are loss making.
The methodology behind identifying loss making cash-generating units is explained in note 14.
Amortisation of non-current other assets of £531,000 (2010: £392,000) has been recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement (see note 3).
81
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
17. Interest in joint venture
On 3 December 2007, the Group acquired 49% of the issued share capital of Focus Brands Limited for an initial cash consideration of £49,000 together with
associated fees of £456,000. Focus Brands Limited was a jointly controlled entity set up for the purposes of acquiring Focus Group Holdings Limited and its
subsidiary companies (‘Focus Group’). The Focus Group is involved in the design, sourcing and distribution of branded and own brand footwear, apparel and
accessories. As at 29 January 2011, Focus Brands Limited was jointly controlled with the former shareholders of Focus Group Holdings Limited.
On 16 February 2011, the Group acquired a further 31% of the issued share capital of Focus Brands Limited for a cash consideration of £1,000,000, with
potential further deferred consideration of £250,000 depending on performance (see note 35). As a result there is no further deferred consideration payable
on the original transaction.
The results and assets and liabilities of the Focus Group are incorporated in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting.
The interest in the joint venture in the Group’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Position is based on the share of the net assets, which are as follows:
Non-current assets
Current assets
Current liabilities
Total net assets
As at
29 January 2011
£000
As at
30 January 2010
£000
447
5,196
(2,185)
3,458
486
4,641
(4,492)
635
The Group’s share of the revenue generated by the joint venture in the period was £15,418,000 (2010: £11,774,000).
The amount included in the Consolidated Income Statement in relation to the joint venture is as follows:
52 weeks to 29 January 2011
52 weeks to 30 January 2010
Before
exceptionals
£000
Exceptionals
£000
After
exceptionals
£000
Before
exceptionals
£000
Exceptionals
£000
After
exceptionals
£000
Share of result before tax
Tax
Share of result after tax
2,102
(627)
1,475
1,549
(201)
1,348
3,651
(828)
2,823
740
(201)
539
(1,406)
394
(1,012)
(666)
193
(473)
As at 29 January 2011, the Group had loan notes receivable from Focus Brands Limited, including accrued interest thereon, to the value of £nil
(2010: £922,000).
The exceptional items in the current year relate to unrealised gains on foreign exchange contracts and the reversal of the impairment of the investment held by
Focus Brands Limited in Focus Group Holdings Limited, following repayment of original purchase consideration by the vendors of Focus Group Holdings Limited.
The exceptional items in the prior year relate entirely to unrealised losses on foreign exchange contracts.
82
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
18. Investments
COMPANY
Cost
At 31 January 2009
Additions
At 30 January 2010
Additions
At 29 January 2011
Impairment
At 31 January 2009
Impairments
At 30 January 2010 and 29 January 2011
Net book value
At 29 January 2011
At 30 January 2010
At 31 January 2009
£000
8,668
4,666
13,334
1,200
14,534
2,000
3,470
5,470
9,064
7,864
6,668
The additions to investments in the year comprise a £1,200,000 additional investment in Hallco 1521 Limited (the intermediate holding company of Topgrade
Sportswear Limited) which takes the Group’s holding to 80% and £1 investment relating to the acquisition of Nanny State Limited (100% owned) (see note 11).
The impairment in the prior period relates to the investment in RD Scott Limited (see note 13).
A full list of subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities is shown in note 37.
19. Available for sale investments
GROUP AND COMPANY
Cost
At 31 January 2009
Additions from rights issue and placing
Disposals
At 30 January 2010 and 29 January 2011
Fair value
At 31 January 2009
Additions from rights issue and placing
Proceeds on disposal net of fees paid
Gain on disposal
At 30 January 2010 and 29 January 2011
£000
8,130
9,990
(18,120)
-
2,053
9,990
(16,132)
4,089
-
The available for sale investments represented investments in listed equity securities. The Group held a non-strategic investment of 9.99% in JJB Sports Plc
until 9 December 2009 when it disposed of 65,018,098 ordinary shares for 25p a share, giving a realised loss on disposal of £1,988,000. With the impairment
recognised in the year ended 31 January 2009 of £6,077,000 this resulted in an exceptional gain in the period to 30 January 2010 of £4,089,000.
83
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
20. Inventories
GROUP
COMPANY
2010
(restated -
see note 1)
£000
2011
£000
2011
£000
2010
£000
Finished goods and goods for resale
84,490
74,475
47,472
44,125
The cost of inventories recognised as expenses and included in cost of sales for the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2011 was £452,520,000
(2010: £393,694,000).
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
2010
£000
2011
£000
2010
£000
13,626
1,955
21,524
-
10,535
2,179
18,943
-
902
601
13,566
67,466
312
876
12,003
64,189
37,105
31,657
82,535
77,380
Gross
£000
7,474
2,973
4,041
2011
Provision
£000
(56)
(25)
(781)
Net
£000
7,418
2,948
3,260
Gross
£000
5,634
2,571
3,246
2010
Provision
£000
(25)
(123)
(768)
Net
£000
5,609
2,448
2,478
14,488
(862)
13,626
11,451
(916)
10,535
Gross
£000
111
475
538
1,124
2011
Provision
£000
-
(26)
(196)
(222)
Net
£000
111
449
342
902
Gross
£000
151
146
123
420
2010
Provision
£000
-
(26)
(82)
(108)
Net
£000
151
120
41
312
21. Trade and other receivables
Current assets
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Prepayments and accrued income
Amounts owed by other Group companies
The ageing of trade receivables is detailed below:
GROUP
Not past due
Past due 30-60 days
Past 60 days
COMPANY
Not past due
Past due 30-60 days
Past 60 days
84
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
21. Trade and other receivables (continued)
The Board consider that the carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximate their fair value. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade
receivables are limited due to the majority of the Group’s customer base being large and unrelated. Therefore, no further credit risk provision is required in excess
of the normal provision for impairment losses, which has been calculated following individual assessments of credit quality based on historic default rates and
knowledge of debtor insolvency or other credit risk.
Movement on this provision is shown below:
At 31 January 2009
Created
Released
On acquisition of subsidiaries
Utilised
At 30 January 2010
Created
Released
Utilised
At 29 January 2011
GROUP
£000
COMPANY
£000
188
241
(105)
661
(69)
916
715
(45)
(724)
862
-
108
-
-
-
108
114
-
-
222
The other classes within trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets.
22. Cash and cash equivalents
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
2010
£000
2011
£000
2010
£000
Bank balances and cash floats
90,131
64,524
81,204
56,954
23. Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
GROUP
COMPANY
Current liabilities
Bank loans and overdrafts
Non-current liabilities
Bank loans and overdrafts
Other loans
2011
£000
2,874
2,874
287
830
2010
£000
2,712
2,712
600
747
1,117
1,347
2011
£000
2010
£000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
85
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
23. Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (continued)
The following provides information about the contractual terms of the Group and Company’s interest-bearing loans and borrowings. For more information about
the Group and Company’s exposure to interest rate risk, see note 24.
Bank facilities
As at 29 January 2011, the Group had a £70,000,000 revolving facility in the UK which was due to expire on 18 October 2011. Under this facility, a maximum of
10 drawdowns could be outstanding at any time with drawdowns made for a period of one, two, three or six months with interest payable at a rate of LIBOR plus
a margin of 0.75% (2010: 0.75%). The commitment fee on the undrawn element of the facility was 45% of the applicable margin rate.
At 29 January 2011, there were no amounts drawndown on this facility (2010: £nil).
Subsequent to the year end, a new committed borrowing facility of £75,000,000 has been agreed. Further information on this new facility is provided in note 35.
Bank loans and overdrafts
The following Group companies have overdraft facilities which are repayable on demand:
•
•
•
Topgrade Sportswear Limited £2,000,000 (2010: £2,000,000)
Nicholas Deakins Limited £600,000 (2010: £600,000)
Chausport SA €3,000,000 (2010: €2,450,000)
Further information on guarantees provided by the Company is disclosed in notes 24 and 34.
Included within bank loans and overdrafts are term loans of £575,000 (2010: £885,000) within Chausport SA which have been taken out to fund the
refurbishment of specific stores. The interest rates range from 5.10% to 6.50% and are secured on the fixtures in those particular stores.
The maturity of the bank loans and overdrafts is as follows:
Within one year
Between one and five years
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
2,874
287
3,161
2010
£000
2,712
600
3,312
2011
£000
2010
£000
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other loans
The Group has a loan payable to Herald Island Limited, the non-controlling interest in Canterbury of New Zealand Limited, which was acquired in the prior
period (see note 11). The loan attracts interest at 3.0% above the Group’s cost of funds and is repayable on exercise of the put and call option (see note 25).
The maturity of the other loans is as follows:
Between one and five years
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
830
830
2010
£000
747
747
2011
£000
-
-
2010
£000
-
-
86
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
24. Financial instruments
Financial assets
The Group’s financial assets are all categorised as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable
payments that are not quoted in an active market. The Group’s loans and receivables comprise ‘Trade and other receivables’, ‘Cash and cash equivalents’ and
‘Loan notes receivable from joint venture’ included within ‘Non-current other assets’ in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise short-term cash deposits with major United Kingdom and European clearing banks earning floating rates of interest based
upon bank base rates or rates linked to LIBOR. The currency profile of cash and cash equivalents is shown below:
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
2010
£000
2011
£000
2010
£000
Bank balances and cash floats
90,131
64,524
81,204
56,954
Sterling
Euros
US Dollars
Australian Dollars
New Zealand Dollars
Other
74,031
7,126
6,984
1,040
930
20
58,887
3,933
762
514
399
29
69,831
4,881
6,492
-
-
-
56,071
383
500
-
-
-
90,131
64,524
81,204
56,954
Included in trade and other receivables are the following foreign currency denominated receivables:
Euros
US Dollars
Australian Dollars
New Zealand Dollars
Other
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
1,350
802
1,845
1,179
387
2010
£000
1,107
294
1,653
1,219
378
2011
£000
240
12
-
-
-
2010
£000
-
-
-
-
-
Financial liabilities
The Group’s financial liabilities are all categorised as other financial liabilities. Other financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost. The Group’s other
financial liabilities comprise ‘Interest-bearing loans and borrowings’ and ‘Trade and other payables’.
The currency profile of interest-bearing loans and borrowings is shown below:
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Sterling
Euros
New Zealand Dollars
2011
£000
3,991
603
2,558
830
3,991
GROUP
2010
£000
4,059
1,567
1,745
747
4,059
COMPANY
2011
£000
2010
£000
-
-
-
-
-
Included in trade and other payables are the following foreign currency denominated payables:
Euros
US Dollars
Australian Dollars
New Zealand Dollars
Other
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
7,775
1,479
197
850
144
2010
£000
7,737
1,153
1,850
333
202
2011
£000
41
469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2010
£000
336
87
-
-
-
87
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
24. Financial instruments (continued)
Risk management
The Group’s operations expose it to a variety of financial risks that include the effects of changes in exchange rates, interest rates, credit risk and its liquidity
position. The Group manages these risks through the use of derivative instruments, which are reviewed on a regular basis. Derivative instruments are not
entered into for speculative purposes. There are no concentrations of risk in the period to 29 January 2011.
Interest rate risk
The Group finances its operations by a mixture of retained profits and bank borrowings. The Group’s borrowings are at floating rates, partially hedged by floating
rate interest on deposits, reflecting the seasonality of its cash flow. Interest rate risk therefore arises from bank borrowings. The Board regularly reviews the
interest rate risk of the Group and uses interest rate swaps to minimise exposure to interest rate fluctuations where appropriate. Given that the Group’s
syndicated facility was not drawn down during the year, the Board did not consider that an interest rate swap on the floating rate facility was necessary in the
period to 29 January 2011. The net fair value of swap liabilities at 29 January 2011 was £nil (2010: £nil).
The Group has potential bank floating rate financial liabilities on its revolving credit facility, together with overdraft facilities in subsidiary companies (see note 23).
There were no drawdowns from the revolving credit facility at 29 January 2011 (2010: £nil) thereby minimising the Group’s interest rate risk at the year end.
When drawdowns are made, the Group is exposed to cash flow interest risk. Under the new facility (see note 35) interest is paid at a rate of LIBOR plus a
margin of 1.25% (previous facility: 0.75%).
As at 29 January 2011 and 30 January 2010, the Group has no liabilities in respect of finance lease or similar hire purchase contracts.
A change of 1.0% in the average interest rates during the year, applied to the Group’s floating interest rate loans and borrowings as at the reporting date, would
change profit before tax by £24,000 (2010: £2,000) and would change equity by £24,000 (2010: £2,000). This assumes that all other variables remain
unchanged. Calculations are performed on the same basis as the prior year.
Foreign currency risk
The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on sales and purchases that are denominated in a currency other than pound sterling. The currencies giving rise
to this risk are the Euro and US Dollar with sales made in Euros and purchases made in both Euros and US Dollars (principal exposure). To protect its foreign
currency position, the Group sets a buying rate in each country for the purchase of goods in US Dollars at the start of the buying season (typically six to nine
months before the product is received) and then enters into a number of local currency/US Dollar contracts whereby the minimum exchange rate on the
purchase of dollars is guaranteed.
As at 29 January 2011, options have been entered into to protect approximately 93% of the US Dollar requirement for the period to January 2012. The balance
of the US Dollar requirement for the period will be satisfied by additional options or at spot rates. Hedge accounting is not applied.
As at 29 January 2011, the fair value of these instruments was a liability of £789,000 (2010: asset of £605,000) which has been included within current liabilities
(2010: current assets). A loss of £1,394,000 has been recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement for the change in fair value of these instruments.
A 10.0% strengthening of sterling relative to the following currencies as at the reporting date would have reduced profit before tax and equity as follows:
Euros
US Dollars
Australian Dollars
New Zealand Dollars
Other
Profit before tax
Equity
2011
£000
179
693
(2)
3
23
896
2010
£000
357
69
47
36
3
512
2011
£000
179
693
(2)
3
23
896
A 10.0% weakening of sterling relative to the following currencies as at the reporting date would have increased profit before tax and equity as follows:
Euros
US Dollars
Australian Dollars
New Zealand Dollars
Other
Profit before tax
Equity
2011
£000
219
848
(2)
3
28
1,096
2010
£000
392
76
52
40
3
563
2011
£000
219
848
(2)
3
28
1,096
Calculations are performed on the same basis as the prior year and the method assumes that all other variables remain unchanged.
2010
£000
357
69
47
36
3
512
2010
£000
392
76
52
40
3
563
88
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
24. Financial instruments (continued)
Credit risk
Credit risk arises from the possibility of customers and counterparties failing to meet their obligations to the Group. Investments of cash surpluses, borrowings and
derivative instruments are made through major United Kingdom and European clearing banks, which must meet minimum credit ratings as required by the Board.
All customers who wish to trade on credit terms are subject to credit verification procedures. Receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis and
provision is made for impairment where amounts are not thought to be recoverable (see note 21). At the reporting date there were no significant concentrations
of credit risk and receivables which are not impaired are believed to be recoverable.
The Group considers its maximum exposure to credit risk to be equivalent to total trade and other receivables of £37,105,000 (2010: £31,657,000), cash and
cash equivalents of £90,131,000 (2010: £64,524,000), deposits of £779,000 (2010: £659,000) and key money of £8,419,000 (2010: £8,553,000).
The Company has provided guarantees on banking facilities entered into by Topgrade Sportswear Limited, Nicholas Deakins Limited and Chausport SA totalling
£2,000,000, £600,000 and €3,000,000 respectively. As at 29 January 2011, these facilities were drawn down by £2,586,000 (2010: £1,567,000). In addition, the
£70,000,000 revolving credit facility agreement, which was in place as at 29 January 2011, encompassed cross guarantees between the Company, RD Scott
Limited, Bank Fashion Limited, Bank Stores Holdings Limited, Bank Stores Financing Limited, Athleisure Limited and First Sport Limited to the extent to which
any of these companies were overdrawn. As at 29 January 2011, these facilities were drawn down by £nil (2010: £nil). Subsequent to the year end, a new
committed borrowing facility of £75,000,000 has been agreed. Further information on this new facility is provided in note 35.
Liquidity risk
The Group manages its cash and borrowing requirement to minimise net interest expense, whilst ensuring that the Group has sufficient liquid resources to meet
the operating needs of the business. The forecast cash and borrowing profile of the Group is monitored on an ongoing basis, to ensure that adequate headroom
remains under committed borrowing facilities. The Board review 13 week and annual cash flow forecasts each month.
Information about the maturity of the Group’s financial liabilities is disclosed in note 23.
As at 29 January 2011, there were undrawn committed facilities with a maturity profile as follows:
Expiring in less than one year
Expiring in more than one year but no more than two years
2011
£000
70,000
-
2010
£000
-
70,000
70,000
70,000
The commitment fee on these facilities is 0.34% (2010: 0.34%).
Fair values
The fair values together with the carrying amounts shown in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 29 January 2011 are as follows:
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings - current
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings - non-current
Trade and other payables - current
Other payables - non-current
Note
21
22
23
23
25
25
GROUP
COMPANY
Carrying
amount
2011
£000
37,105
90,131
(2,874)
(1,117)
(128,445)
(28,782)
Fair value
2011
£000
37,105
90,131
(2,874)
(1,117)
(128,445)
(28,782)
Carrying
amount
2011
£000
82,535
81,204
-
-
(85,520)
(24,370)
Fair value
2011
£000
82,535
81,204
-
-
(85,520)
(24,370)
(33,982)
(33,982)
53,849
53,849
Unrecognised gains/(losses)
-
-
89
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
24. Financial instruments (continued)
Fair values (continued)
The comparatives at 30 January 2010 are as follows:
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings - current
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings - non-current
Trade and other payables - current
Other payables - non-current
Note
21
22
23
23
25
25
GROUP
COMPANY
Carrying
amount
2010
£000
31,657
64,524
(2,712)
(1,347)
(115,742)
(24,050)
Fair value
2010
£000
31,657
64,524
(2,712)
(1,347)
(115,742)
(24,050)
Carrying
amount
2010
£000
77,380
56,954
-
-
(78,294)
(23,464)
Fair value
2010
£000
77,380
56,954
-
-
(78,294)
(23,464)
(47,670)
(47,670)
32,576
32,576
Unrecognised gains/(losses)
-
-
In the opinion of the Board, the fair value of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities as at 29 January 2011 and 30 January 2010 are not considered to be
materially different to that of the book value. On this basis, the carrying amounts have not been adjusted for the fair values.
Estimation of fair values
For trade and other receivables/payables (as adjusted for the fair value of foreign exchange contracts), the notional amount is deemed to reflect the fair value.
Fair value hierarchy
As at 29 January 2011, the Group held the following financial instruments carried at fair value on the Statement of Financial Position:
•
Foreign exchange forward contracts - non-hedged
The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:
Level 1: quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: other techniques for which all inputs which have a significant effect on the recorded fair value are observable, either directly or indirectly
Level 3: techniques which use inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based on observable market data
At 29 January 2011
Carrying amount
£000
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Foreign exchange forward contracts – non-hedged
(789)
At 30 January 2010
Carrying amount
£000
Level 1
£000
-
Level 1
£000
Level 2
£000
(789)
Level 2
£000
Level 3
£000
-
Level 3
£000
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Foreign exchange forward contracts – non-hedged
605
-
605
-
25. Trade and other payables
Current liabilities
Trade payables
Other payables and accrued expenses
Other tax and social security costs
Non-current liabilities
Other payables and accrued expenses
Amounts payable to other Group companies
90
GROUP
COMPANY
2011
£000
56,297
54,103
18,045
2010
£000
52,268
49,265
14,209
128,445
115,742
28,782
-
28,782
24,050
-
24,050
2011
£000
40,777
34,627
10,116
85,520
17,788
6,582
24,370
2010
£000
38,828
31,086
8,380
78,294
16,882
6,582
23,464
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
25. Trade and other payables (continued)
Put and call options
The Group has a number of options to buy the remaining shares in partly-owned subsidiaries from the non-controlling interest. The present value of these
options has been estimated as at 29 January 2011 and is included within non-current other payables and accrued expenses.
Canterbury of New Zealand
On 23 December 2009, the Group (via its subsidiary Canterbury Limited) acquired 51% of the issued ordinary share capital of Canterbury of New Zealand
Limited. The transaction included the agreement of a put and call option between Canterbury Limited and the vendors of Canterbury of New Zealand, whereby
Canterbury Limited may acquire the remaining 49% of the issued share capital of Canterbury of New Zealand Limited.
This option is exercisable by either party on the third anniversary of the completion of the initial transaction and on each anniversary thereafter. The option price is
calculated based on a multiple of average audited profit before tax over the two most recently completed financial years prior to the exercise date. The option price
shall not exceed NZ $15,000,000.
At as 29 January 2011, the present value of the non-controlling interest’s put option has been calculated based on expected earnings in Board-approved forecasts
and a discount rate of 14.9%, which is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks and costs of capital of the Group. A liability of £1,202,000 has been recognised
(2010: £nil), with a corresponding debit to other equity.
Canterbury European Fashionwear Limited
On 27 July 2010, a new Group company was incorporated, Canterbury European Fashionwear Limited, which is 75% owned by Canterbury Limited, with the
remaining 25% owned by a party external to the Group. On incorporation, a put and call option was agreed between Canterbury Limited and the non-controlling
interest in Canterbury European Fashionwear Limited, whereby Canterbury Limited may acquire the remaining 25% of the issued share capital of Canterbury
European Fashionwear Limited.
This option is exercisable by either party on the fifth anniversary of incorporation and on each anniversary thereafter until the fifteenth anniversary, unless both
parties agree to extend this term. The option price is calculated based on a multiple of average audited profit before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation
over the two most recently completed financial years prior to the exercise date. The option price shall not exceed £15,000,000.
At as 29 January 2011, the present value of the non-controlling interest’s put option has been calculated based on expected earnings in Board-approved forecasts
and a discount rate of 14.9%, which is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks and costs of capital of the Group. The present value of this option has been assessed
as £nil as at 29 January 2011. Accordingly, no liability has been recognised.
Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited
On 23 December 2009, the Group (via its subsidiary Canterbury Limited) acquired 100% of the issued ordinary share capital of Canterbury International
(Australia) Pty Limited. Subsequently, on 28 January 2011, Canterbury Limited disposed of 25% of the issued ordinary share capital of Canterbury International
(Australia) Pty Limited by issuing new shares to the management team in exchange for a cash consideration of AUD $1,100,000. On completion of this transac-
tion, a put and call option was agreed between Canterbury Limited and the non-controlling interest in Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited, whereby
Canterbury Limited may re-acquire the remaining 25% issued ordinary share capital from the non-controlling interest.
This option is exercisable by either party on 1 March 2014 and on each anniversary thereafter. The option price is calculated based on a multiple of average
earnings before tax. If, either, Canterbury Limited exercises its call option, or, the non-controlling interest exercises its put option and profit before tax has improved
over the two most recent financial years, the option price is based on a multiple of average audited earnings before tax over the two most recently completed
financial years prior to the exercise date. If the non-controlling interest gives notice to exercise its put option and profit before tax has declined over the two most
recent financial years, the put option is deferred until 1 October in the year of the exercise date. The option price is based on a multiple of earnings before tax,
however, the time period over which average earnings is calculated varies depending on the performance of the business to 31 July in the year of the exercise
date. In all cases the option price shall not exceed AUD $30,000,000.
At as 29 January 2011, the present value of the non-controlling interest’s put option has been calculated based on expected earnings in Board-approved forecasts
and a discount rate of 14.9%, which is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks and costs of capital of the Group. A liability of £567,000 has been recognised, with a
corresponding debit to other equity.
91
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
26. Provisions
The provisions for onerous property leases represent anticipated minimum contractual lease costs less potential sublease income for vacant properties. For loss
making stores, provision is made to the extent that the lease is deemed to be onerous. The provisions are discounted where the effect is material. The pre-tax
discount rate used is the Group’s weighted average cost of capital of 14.9% (2010: 12.7%).
Within the onerous contracts provision, management have recognised that the expected benefits to be derived from a contract are lower than the unavoidable
cost of meeting the obligations under the contract. The provisions have been made to the extent that the contracts are deemed to be onerous.
GROUP
Balance at 30 January 2010
Provisions created during the period
Provisions released during the period
Provisions utilised during the period
Balance at 29 January 2011
Provisions have been analysed between current and non-current as follows:
GROUP
Current
Non-current
COMPANY
Balance at 30 January 2010
Provisions created during the period
Provisions released during the period
Provisions utilised during the period
Balance at 29 January 2011
Provisions have been analysed between current and non-current as follows:
COMPANY
Current
Non-current
Onerous
property leases
£000
Onerous
contracts
£000
9,731
2,875
(1,038)
(2,834)
8,734
584
-
-
(290)
294
2011
£000
2,591
6,437
9,028
2011
£000
1,920
4,072
5,992
Total
£000
10,315
2,875
(1,038)
(3,124)
9,028
2010
£000
2,920
7,395
10,315
Onerous
property leases
£000
7,746
874
(668)
(1,960)
5,992
2010
£000
1,942
5,804
7,746
92
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
27. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following
GROUP
Property, plant and equipment
Chargeable gains held
over/rolled over
General accruals
Tax losses
Assets
2011
£000
(626)
-
-
(709)
Tax (assets)/liabilities
(1,335)
Assets
2010
£000
Liabilities
2011
£000
Liabilities
2010
£000
-
-
-
(724)
(724)
-
320
890
-
330
332
810
-
1,210
1,472
Net
2011
£000
(626)
320
890
(709)
(125)
Net
2010
£000
330
332
810
(724)
748
Deferred tax assets on losses of AUD $20,955,000 within Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited and losses of £4,629,000 within Kooga Rugby Limited
have not been recognised as there is uncertainty over the utilisation of these losses.
Movement in deferred tax during the period
Property, plant
and equipment
£000
Chargeable
gains held over/
rolled over
£000
General
accruals
£000
Tax losses
£000
GROUP
Balance at 31 January 2009
On acquisition
Recognised in income
Balance at 30 January 2010
Recognised in income
Balance at 29 January 2011
77
-
253
330
(956)
(626)
332
-
-
332
(12)
320
457
-
353
810
80
890
Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following:
COMPANY
Property, plant and equipment
Chargeable gains held
over/rolled over
General accruals
Tax (assets)/liabilities
Assets
2011
£000
(331)
-
(1,071)
(1,402)
Assets
2010
£000
Liabilities
2011
£000
Liabilities
2010
£000
(95)
-
(847)
(942)
-
320
-
320
-
332
-
332
Movement in deferred tax during the period
COMPANY
Balance at 31 January 2009
Recognised in income
Balance at 30 January 2010
Recognised in income
Balance at 29 January 2011
Property, plant
and equipment
£000
Chargeable
gains held over/
rolled over
£000
332
-
332
(12)
176
(271)
(95)
(236)
(331)
Total
£000
379
(5)
374
748
(873)
(125)
Net
2010
£000
(95)
332
(847)
(610)
Total
£000
(571)
(39)
(610)
(472)
(487)
(5)
(232)
(724)
15
(709)
Net
2011
£000
(331)
320
(1,071)
(1,082)
General
accruals
£000
(1,079)
232
(847)
(224)
320
(1,071)
(1,082)
93
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
27. Deferred tax assets and liabilities (continued)
At 29 January 2011, the Group has no recognised deferred income tax liability (2010: £nil) in respect of taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings
of certain subsidiaries. As at 29 January 2011, the unrecognised gross temporary differences in respect of reserves of overseas subsidiaries is £3,034,000
(2010: £705,000). No deferred income tax liability has been recognised in respect of this temporary timing difference due to the foreign profits exemption, the
availability of double tax relief and the ability to control the remittance of earnings.
There are no income tax consequences attached to the payment of dividends by the Group to its shareholders.
28. Capital
Issued ordinary share capital
GROUP AND COMPANY
Number of
ordinary shares
thousands
Ordinary
share capital
£000
At 30 January 2010 and 29 January 2011
48,662
2,433
The total number of authorised ordinary shares was 62,150,000 (2010: 62,150,000) with a par value of 5p per share (2010: 5p per share). All issued shares are
fully paid.
The capital structure of the Group consists of equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued share capital, share premium and retained earnings.
It is the Board’s policy to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business.
The Board consider the capital of the Group as the net cash/debt at the year end (see note 32) and the Board review the gearing position of the Group which as at
29 January 2011 was less than zero (2010: less than zero). There were no changes to the Group’s approach to capital management during the period.
Full disclosure on the rights attached to shares is provided in the Directors’ Report on page 38.
29. Dividends
After the reporting date the following dividends were proposed by the Directors. The dividends were not provided for at the reporting date.
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
19.20p per ordinary share (2010: 14.70p)
9,343
7,153
Dividends on issued ordinary share capital
Final dividend of 14.70p (2010: 8.90p) per qualifying ordinary share paid in respect of prior period,
but not recognised as a liability in that period
Interim dividend of 3.80p (2010: 3.30p) per qualifying ordinary share paid in respect of current period
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
7,153
1,849
9,002
4,331
1,606
5,937
94
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
30. Commitments
Group
(i) Capital commitments
As at 29 January 2011, the Group had entered into contracts to purchase property, plant and equipment as follows:
GROUP
Contracted
2011
£000
9,772
2010
£000
2,953
Included in the commitments is £6,500,000 for the purchase of property, plant and equipment for the new warehouse which is due for completion in Spring 2012.
Of this commitment £1,500,000 will be settled in the financial period to 2 February 2013. The remainder of the commitments will be settled in the financial period
to 28 January 2012.
(ii) Operating lease commitments
The Group leases various retail outlets, offices, warehouses, plant and equipment under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The leases have varying
terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights.
Undiscounted total future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
GROUP
Within one year
Later than one year and not later than five years
After five years
Land and
buildings
2011
£000
78,644
258,483
238,698
Plant and
equipment
2011
£000
1,142
935
-
Land and
buildings
2010
£000
76,106
256,313
238,778
575,825
2,077
571,197
Plant and
equipment
2010
£000
1,125
1,073
-
2,198
The future minimum rentals payable on land and buildings represent the base rents that are due on each property. Certain properties have rents which are partly
dependent on turnover levels in the individual store concerned.
(iii) Sublease receipts
The Group subleases various retail outlets under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal
rights. The total future minimum operating sublease receipts expected to be received at 29 January 2011 are as follows:
GROUP
Within one year
Later than one year and not later than five years
After five years
Company
(i) Capital commitments
As at 29 January 2011, the Company had entered into contracts to purchase property, plant and equipment as follows:
COMPANY
Contracted
2011
£000
507
1,154
1,376
3,037
2011
£000
8,015
2010
£000
623
1,868
2,531
5,022
2010
£000
2,217
Included in the commitments is £6,500,000 for the purchase of property, plant and equipment for the new warehouse which is due for completion in Spring 2012.
Of this commitment £1,500,000 will be settled in the financial period to 2 February 2013. The remainder of the commitments will be settled in the financial period
to 28 January 2012.
95
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
30. Commitments (continued)
Company (continued)
(ii) Operating lease commitments
The Company leases various retail outlets, offices, warehouses, plant and equipment under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The leases have
varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights.
Undiscounted total future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
COMPANY
Within one year
Later than one year and not later than five years
After five years
Land and
buildings
2011
£000
59,581
193,267
193,930
Plant and
equipment
2011
£000
934
753
-
Land and
buildings
2010
£000
57,219
193,453
183,931
Plant and
equipment
2010
£000
789
729
-
446,778
1,687
434,603
1,518
(iii) Sublease receipts
The Company subleases various retail outlets under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and
renewal rights. The total future minimum operating sublease receipts expected to be received at 29 January 2011 are as follows:
COMPANY
Within one year
Later than one year and not later than five years
After five years
31. Pension schemes
2011
£000
428
1,099
1,376
2,903
2010
£000
538
1,736
2,531
4,805
The Group only operates defined contribution pension schemes. The pension charge for the period represents contributions payable by the Group of £1,154,000
(2010: £765,000) in respect of employees, and £47,000 (2010: £44,000) in respect of Directors. The amount owed to the schemes at the period end was
£63,000 (2010: £125,000).
32. Analysis of net cash
GROUP
Cash at bank and in hand
Overdrafts
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings:
Bank loans
Other loans
COMPANY
Cash at bank and in hand
Cash and cash equivalents
96
At 30 January 2010
£000
Cash flow
£000
At 29 January 2011
£000
64,524
(2,427)
25,607
(159)
90,131
(2,586)
62,097
25,448
87,545
(885)
(747)
310
(83)
(575)
(830)
60,465
25,675
86,140
At 30 January 2010
£000
Cash flow
£000
At 29 January 2011
£000
56,954
56,954
24,250
24,250
81,204
81,204
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
33. Related party transactions and balances
Transactions and balances with related parties during the period are shown below. Transactions were undertaken in the ordinary course of business on an
arms length basis. Outstanding balances are unsecured (unless otherwise stated) and will be settled in cash.
Transactions with related parties who are not members of the Group
During the period, the Group entered into the following transactions with related parties who are not members of the Group:
GROUP
Pentland Group Plc
Sale of inventory
Purchase of inventory
Royalty costs
Other income
Focus Brands Limited
Purchase of inventory
Interest income
Rental income
Royalty income
Income from
related parties
2011
£000
Expenditure with
related parties
2011
£000
Income from
related parties
2010
£000
Expenditure with
related parties
2010
£000
440
-
-
264
-
1
308
480
-
(13,306)
(104)
-
(12,201)
-
-
-
-
-
-
351
-
43
319
104
-
(18,684)
-
-
(4,426)
-
-
-
At the end of the period, the following balances were outstanding with related parties who are not members of the Group:
GROUP
Pentland Group Plc
Trade receivables/(payables)
Focus Brands Limited
Loan notes receivable (including accrued interest)
Other receivables
Trade payables
Amounts owed by
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed by
related parties
2010
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2010
£000
21
(1,226)
-
(1,310)
-
273
-
-
-
(3,154)
922
-
-
-
-
(567)
During the period, the Company entered into the following transactions with related parties who are not members of the Group:
COMPANY
Pentland Group Plc
Purchase of inventory
Other income
Focus Brands Limited
Purchase of inventory
Interest income
Rental income
Royalty income
Income from
related parties
2011
£000
Expenditure with
related parties
2011
£000
Income from
related parties
2010
£000
Expenditure with
related parties
2010
£000
-
236
-
1
308
480
(10,821)
-
(4,218)
-
-
-
-
332
-
43
319
104
(17,096)
-
(2,429)
-
-
-
97
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
33. Related party transactions and balances (continued)
At the end of the period, the Company had the following balances outstanding with related parties who are not members of the Group:
COMPANY
Pentland Group Plc
Trade receivables/(payables)
Focus Brands Limited
Loan notes receivable (including accrued interest)
Other receivables
Trade payables
Amounts owed by
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed by
related parties
2010
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2010
£000
3
-
263
-
(653)
-
-
(167)
-
(1,292)
922
-
-
-
-
(27)
Pentland Group Plc owns 57.5% (2010: 57.5%) of the issued ordinary share capital of JD Sports Fashion Plc. The Group and Company made purchases of
inventory from Pentland Group Plc in the period and the Group also sold inventory to Pentland Group Plc. The other income represents marketing contributions
received, whilst the Group also paid royalty costs to Pentland Group Plc for the use of a brand.
Focus Brands Limited was an entity jointly controlled by JD Sports Fashion Plc and the former shareholders of Focus Group Holdings Limited. At the reporting
date JD Sports Fashion Plc owned 49% of the issued share capital. The Company and its subsidiaries made purchases from the Focus Group, the Company
rents a property to this entity and the Company receives royalty income in relation to the Sergio Tacchini licence (see note 13). In the prior year JD Sports Fashion
Plc had loan notes receivable from Focus Brands Limited (see note 16).
Transactions with related parties who are members of the Group
During the period, the Company entered into the following transactions with related parties who are members of the Group:
Income from
related parties
2011
£000
Expenditure with
related parties
2011
£000
Income from
related parties
2010
£000
Expenditure with
related parties
2010
£000
-
(238)
-
(100)
146
57
6,782
1,769
-
11
92
-
1,198
77
-
-
-
-
(67)
-
(291)
(166)
(208)
-
131
13
5,866
1,731
-
-
-
-
1,225
37
-
-
-
-
(19)
-
(250)
(162)
(101)
-
COMPANY
Canterbury of New Zealand Limited (UK)
Purchase of inventory
JD Sports Fashion (France) SAS
Interest income
Duffer of St George Limited
Interest income
John David Sports Fashion (Ireland) Limited
Sale of inventory
Other income
Kooga Rugby Limited
Purchase of inventory
Nanny State Limited
Interest income
Nicholas Deakins Limited
Sale/(purchase) of inventory
RD Scott Limited
Concession fee
Topgrade Sportswear Limited
Sale/(purchase) of inventory
Interest income
98
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
33. Related party transactions and balances (continued)
At the end of the period, the Company had the following balances outstanding with related parties who are members of the Group:
COMPANY
Athleisure Limited
Long term loan
Bank Stores Holdings Limited
Long term loan
Bank Fashion Limited
Other intercompany balances
Canterbury Limited
Secured loan
Working capital loan
Canterbury of New Zealand Limited (UK)
Working capital loan
Trade payables
Canterbury European Fashionwear Limited
Income tax Group relief
First Sport Limited
Long term loan
JD Sports Fashion (France) SAS
Long term loan
Chausport SA
Other intercompany balances
Duffer of St George Limited
Secured loan
Income tax Group relief
John David Sports Fashion (Ireland) Limited
Trade receivables
Other intercompany balances
John David Sports Limited
Other intercompany balance
Kooga Rugby Limited
Long term loan (net of provision)
Working capital loan
Trade payables
Income tax Group relief
Nanny State Limited
Secured loan
Working capital loan
Income tax Group relief
Nicholas Deakins Limited
Trade receivables/(payables)
Other intercompany balances
Amounts owed by
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed by
related parties
2010
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2010
£000
6,638
13,046
-
6,500
3,594
7,574
-
-
-
4,102
3,210
1,121
-
399
3,492
942
1,499
2,185
-
-
472
620
-
57
106
-
-
-
-
-
-
(12)
(167)
(6,582)
-
-
-
(4)
-
-
-
-
-
(2)
(44)
-
-
(4)
(11)
-
6,638
15,341
32
6,500
2,587
6,456
-
-
-
4,129
726
1,514
-
285
4,034
-
1,499
1,806
-
-
-
-
-
-
122
-
-
-
-
-
-
(15)
-
(6,582)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1)
-
-
-
-
-
-
99
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
33. Related party transactions and balances (continued)
COMPANY (continued)
RD Scott Limited
Long term loan
Trade receivables/(payables)
Income tax Group relief
Topgrade Sportswear Limited
Working capital loan
Trade receivables/(payables)
Income tax Group relief
Amounts owed by
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2011
£000
Amounts owed by
related parties
2010
£000
Amounts owed to
related parties
2010
£000
6,833
6
-
6,328
255
-
-
(57)
(247)
-
(867)
(98)
8,694
51
-
4,008
4
-
-
(24)
(197)
-
-
-
Long term loans represent historic intercompany balances and initial investment in subsidiary undertakings to enable them to purchase other businesses.
These loans do not attract interest, with the exception of the loan to JD Sports Fashion (France) SAS, where interest is charged at the official French
government interest rate. This interest rate is variable and is reviewed quarterly.
Working capital loans represent short term financing provided by the Company to its subsidiaries. These loans do not attract interest, with the exception of the
loan to Topgrade Sportswear Limited which is not a wholly owned subsidiary. This loan attracts interest at the UK base rate plus a margin of 1.0%.
The secured loans from the Company to Canterbury Limited, Duffer of St George Limited and Nanny State Limited are secured upon the intellectual property in
these companies. The loan to Canterbury Limited does not attract interest, whereas the loans to Duffer of St George Limited and Nanny State Limited accrue
interest at the UK base rate plus a margin of 4.0%.
Other intercompany balances relate to recharges.
Trade receivables/payables relate to the sale and purchase of stock between the Company and its subsidiaries on arms length terms.
There have been no transactions in the year (2010: £nil) and there are no balances outstanding (2010: £nil) with the other subsidiary undertakings of the
Company, as listed in note 37.
34. Contingent liabilities
The Company has provided the following guarantees:
•
•
•
•
•
Guarantee on the letter of credit facility in Focus Brands Limited. The contingent liability varies depending on the value of the letters of credit
outstanding at any point in time, but the maximum exposure on this guarantee is £1,000,000 (2010: £1,000,000)
Guarantees on the working capital facilities in both Topgrade Sportswear Limited and Nicholas Deakins Limited of £2,000,000 (2010: £2,000,000) and
£600,000 (2010: £600,000) respectively
Guarantee capped at £2,500,000 (2010: £2,500,000) in relation to the acquisition of Canterbury of New Zealand Limited under a kit supply and
sponsorship agreement with the Scottish Rugby Union Plc, which was entered into in January 2010
Guarantee on the working capital facilities in Chausport SA of €3,000,000 (2010: €nil)
Guarantee on the letter of credit facility in Canterbury (North America) LLC. The contingent liability varies depending on the value of the letters of credit
outstanding at any point in time, but the maximum exposure on this guarantee is $550,000 (2010: $nil)
35. Subsequent events
Acquisition of Kukri Sports Limited
On 7 February 2011, the Group acquired 80% of the issued share capital of Kukri Sports Limited for a cash consideration of £1. Kukri Sports Limited has a
number of subsidiaries around the world, which source and provide bespoke sports teamwear to schools, universities and sports clubs. In addition, Kukri Sports
Limited is sole kit supplier to a number of professional sports teams. For the year ended 30 April 2010, Kukri Sports Limited had a turnover of £12.9 million, an
operating loss of £0.3 million, a loss before tax of £0.2 million and gross assets of £2.5 million. The fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is currently
being determined.
Acquisition of additional shares in Focus Brands Limited
On 16 February 2011, the Group acquired a further 31% of the issued share capital of Focus Brands Limited for a cash consideration of £1,000,000, with
potential further deferred consideration of £250,000 depending on performance. The Group’s original share of 49% was acquired on 3 December 2007. Focus
Brands Limited was originally incorporated in order to acquire Focus Group Holdings Limited and its subsidiary companies and was an entity jointly controlled by
the Group and the former shareholders of Focus Group Holdings Limited. The additional shares purchased since the reporting date take the Group’s holding in
Focus Brands Limited to 80%, thereby giving the Group control. Focus Brands Limited is now a subsidiary of the Group rather than a jointly-controlled entity.
Acquisition of Champion Sports (Holdings)
On 4 April 2011, the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Champion Sports (Holdings) for a cash consideration of €7 and have also advanced
€17.1 million to allow it to settle all of its indebtedness save for €2.5 million of leasing finance. Champion was founded in 1992 and is one of the leading retailers
of sports apparel and footwear in the Republic of Ireland with 22 stores in premium locations in town centres and shopping centres. In addition, Champion has
one store in Northern Ireland. For the year ended 31 December 2009, Champion had a turnover of €54.0 million, an operating loss of €1.8 million, a loss before
tax of €4.9 million and gross assets of €36.2 million. The fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is currently being determined.
100
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
35. Subsequent events (continued)
New committed bank facility
On 12 April 2011, the Group agreed a new syndicated committed £75,000,000 bank facility for 54 months to 11 October 2015. The principal terms of this facility are:
•
•
•
Current margin 1.25%
Arrangement fee 0.60%
Commitment fee 45% of applicable margin
The new facility encompasses cross guarantees between the Company, Bank Fashion Limited, RD Scott Limited, Topgrade Sportswear Limited, Nicholas
Deakins Limited, Canterbury Limited, Canterbury of New Zealand Limited and Focus International Limited.
36. Ultimate parent company
The Company is a subsidiary undertaking of Pentland Group Plc which is also the ultimate parent company. Pentland Group Plc is incorporated in England and Wales.
The largest group in which the results of the Company are consolidated is that headed by Pentland Group Plc. The results of Pentland Group Plc may be
obtained from Companies House, Crown Way, Cardiff, CF14 3UZ.
The Company has taken advantage of the exemption in s408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to present its individual income statement and related notes.
The total recognised income and expense for the parent included in these consolidated financial statements is £47,045,000 (2010: £41,314,000). The
Consolidated Financial Statements of JD Sports Fashion Plc are available to the public and may be obtained from The Company Secretary, JD Sports Fashion
Plc, Hollinsbrook Way, Pilsworth, Bury, BL9 8RR or online at www.jdplc.com.
101
Notes to
the Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
37. Principal subsidiary undertakings and jointly controlled entities
The following companies were the principal subsidiary undertakings and jointly controlled entities of JD Sports Fashion Plc at 29 January 2011.
Place of
registration
Nature of business
and operation
Ownership
interest
Voting rights
interest
Name of subsidiary
John David Sports Fashion (Ireland) Limited
JD Sports Limited*
John David Sports Limited
The John David Group Limited
JD Sports Limited
Athleisure Limited
First Sport Limited*
Allsports (Retail) Limited*
Allsports.co.uk Limited*
The Sports Shop (Fife) Limited*
Jog Shop Limited*
RD Scott Limited
Bank Stores Holdings Limited
Bank Stores Financing Limited*
Bank Fashion Limited*
Sonneti Fashions Limited*
Hallco 1521 Limited
Topgrade Sportswear Limited*
Getthelabel.com Limited*
Topgrade Trading Limited*
Nicholas Deakins Limited
JD Sports Fashion (France) SAS
Chausport SA*
Spodis SA*
Kooga Rugby Limited
Canterbury Limited
Canterbury of New Zealand Limited*
Ireland
Ireland
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
France
France
France
UK
UK
UK
Retailer of sports inspired footwear and apparel
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant
Intermediate holding company
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant
Retailer of fashion clothing and footwear
Intermediate holding company
Intermediate holding company
Retailer of fashion clothing and footwear
Dormant
Intermediate holding company
Distributor and multichannel retailer of sports and fashion
clothing and footwear
Dormant
Dormant
Distributor of fashion footwear and clothing
Intermediate holding company
Intermediate holding company
Retailer of sports footwear and accessories
Distributor of rugby clothing and accessories
Intermediate holding company
Distributor of leisure wear and rugby apparel
Canterbury International (Far East) Limited*
Hong Kong
Distributor of leisure wear and rugby apparel
Canterbury (North America) LLC*
America
Distributor of leisure wear and rugby apparel
Canterbury Cotton Oxford Limited*
UK
Dormant
Canterbury International (Australia) Pty Limited*
Australia
Distributor of leisure wear and rugby apparel
Canterbury of New Zealand Limited*
New Zealand Distributor of leisure wear and rugby apparel
Canterbury European Fashionwear Limited*
Duffer of St George Limited
Open Fashion Limited
Nanny State Limited
Name of jointly controlled entity
Focus Brands Limited
Focus Group Holdings Limited*
Focus International Limited*
Focus Sports & Leisure International Limited*
Focus Italy Srl*
Focus Equipment Limited*
*Indirect holding of the Company.
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
Italy
UK
Distributor of leisure wear and rugby apparel
Licensor of a fashion brand
Dormant
Distributor of fashion footwear and apparel
Intermediate holding company
Dormant
Distributor of sports clothing and footwear
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
80%
80%
80%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
75%
51%
75%
100%
100%
100%
49%
49%
49%
49%
49%
49%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
80%
80%
80%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
75%
51%
75%
100%
100%
100%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
102
Five Year Record
Consolidated Income Statement
52 weeks to
27 January 2007
£000
52 weeks to
2 February 2008
£000
52 weeks to
31 January 2009
£000
52 weeks to
30 January 2010
£000
52 weeks to
29 January 2011
£000
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling and distribution expenses - normal
Selling and distribution expenses - exceptional
530,581
(278,331)
252,250
(209,270)
(3,799)
592,240
(300,813)
291,427
(225,994)
(8,404)
670,855
(340,309)
330,546
(256,315)
(8,201)
769,785
(390,248)
379,537
(288,462)
(6,458)
883,669
(446,657)
437,012
(326,296)
(3,277)
Selling and distribution expenses
(213,069)
(234,398)
(264,516)
(294,920)
(329,573)
Administrative expenses - normal
Administrative expenses - exceptional
(17,409)
(4,000)
(22,500)
-
(20,867)
(8,122)
(26,051)
1,472
(32,966)
(1,007)
Administrative expenses
(21,409)
(22,500)
(28,989)
(24,579)
(33,973)
Other operating income
1,730
1,086
1,109
2,270
2,177
Operating profit
19,502
35,615
38,150
62,308
75,643
Before exceptional items
Exceptional items
27,301
(7,799)
44,019
(8,404)
54,473
(16,323)
67,294
(4,986)
79,927
(4,284)
Operating profit before financing and share
of result of joint venture
Share of results of joint venture before
exceptional items (net of income tax)
Share of exceptional items (net of income tax)
Share of results of joint venture
Financial income
Financial expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
19,502
35,615
38,150
62,308
75,643
-
-
-
177
(2,412)
17,267
(6,879)
(145)
-
(145)
297
(764)
35,003
(11,416)
(166)
914
748
529
(1,210)
38,217
(13,707)
539
(1,012)
(473)
385
(827)
61,393
(18,647)
1,475
1,348
2,823
618
(455)
78,629
(22,762)
Profit for the period
10,388
23,587
24,510
42,746
55,867
Attributable to equity holders of the parent
Attributable to non-controlling interest
10,388
-
23,549
38
24,379
131
42,900
(154)
55,884
(17)
Basic earnings per ordinary share
21.52p
48.79p
50.49p
88.16p
114.84p
Adjusted basic earnings per ordinary share (i)
36.41p
57.05p
72.33p
93.64p
116.86p
Dividends per ordinary share (ii)
7.20p
8.50p
12.00p
18.00p
23.00p
(i) Adjusted basic earnings per ordinary share is based on earnings excluding the post-tax effect of certain exceptional items (see note 10).
(ii) Represents dividends declared for the year. Under IFRS dividends are only accrued when approved.
103
Financial Calendar
Final Results Announced
Final Dividend Record Date
Financial Statements Published
Annual General Meeting
Final Dividend Payable
Interim Results Announced
Period End (52 Weeks)
Final Results Announced
13 April 2011
6 May 2011
May 2011
23 June 2011
1 August 2011
September 2011
28 January 2012
April 2012
Shareholder Information
Registered office
JD Sports Fashion Plc
Hollinsbrook Way
Pilsworth
Bury BL9 8RR
Company number
Registered in England
and Wales,
Number 1888425
Financial advisers
and stockbrokers
Investec
2 Gresham Street
London EC2V 7QP
Financial public relations
MHP Communications
60 Great Portland Street
London W1W 7RT
Principal bankers
Barclays Bank Plc
43 High Street
Sutton
Surrey SM1 1DR
Registrars
Equiniti Limited
Aspect House
Spencer Road
Lancing
West Sussex BN99 6DA
Solicitors
DLA Piper UK LLP
Princes Exchange
Princes Square
Leeds LS1 4BY
Auditor
KPMG Audit Plc
St James’ Square
Manchester M2 6DS
The Board wishes to express its thanks to the marketing and finance departments for the in-house production of this Annual Report and Accounts.
104