1284 North Telegraph Road • Monroe, Michigan 48162 USA
la-z-boy.com • americandrew.com • bauhaususa.com • englandfurniture.com • hammary.com • kincaidfurniture.com • leafurniture.com • lazboykidz.com
Printed in the USA
2012 ANNUAL REPORT
FAMILYcomfortCOMMUNITYDURABILITYINNOVATIONmade inamericacustomizationqualitycommunityheritageCUSTOMfamilyQUALITYtogetherLOYALTYfamily Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Member, Cooley Hehl Wohlgamuth & Carlton, PLLC
David K. Hehl
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Kurt L. Darrow
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
John H. Foss
Retired Manufacturing Financial Executive
Director of United Bancorp, Inc.
Richard M. Gabrys
Lead Director
Retired Vice Chairman of Deloitte & Touche LLP
Director of CMS Energy Corp.
Director of TriMas Corporation
Janet L. Gurwitch
Chairman of Gurwitch Consulting Group, LLC
Director of Drybar Holdings, LLC
Director of Urban Decay Cosmetics, LLC
Operating Partner of Castanea Partners, Inc.
CORPORATE EXECUTIVES
CORPORATE EXECUTIVES
Kurt L. Darrow
Chairman , President and Chief Executive Officer
Louis M. Riccio, Jr.
Senior VP and Chief Financial Officer
W. Alan McCollough
Former Chairman and CEO, Circuit City Stores, Inc.
Director of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Director of VF Corporation
Nido R. Qubein
President, High Point University
Chairman, Great Harvest Bread Company
Director of BB&T Corporation
Director of Dots, LLC
Edwin J. Holman
Chairman of the Board, The Pantry, Inc.
Chairman of the Board, RGIS International
Janet E. Kerr
Professor of Law and Executive Director, The Palmer
Center for Entrepreneurship and the Law at
Pepperdine University School of Law
Director of Tilly’s, Inc.
Director of TCW Strategic Income Fund, Inc.
Director of TCW Funds, Inc.
Dr. H. George Levy
Otorhinolaryngologist
Greg A. Brinks
VP and Treasurer
J. Douglas Collier
Chief Marketing Officer and President International
James A. Wiygul
President, Bauhaus
OTHER EXECUTIVES
OTHER EXECUTIVES
R. Jack Richardson, Jr.
President, American Drew, Lea and Hammary
Mark S. Bacon, Sr.
Senior VP/President La-Z-Boy Branded Business
Daniel F. Deland
Chief Information Officer
Steven M. Kincaid
Senior VP/President Casegoods and
James P. Klarr
Secretary and Corporate Counsel
President, Kincaid
Otis S. Sawyer
Senior VP/President Non-Branded Upholstery
and President, England, Inc.
Margaret L. Mueller
VP, Corporate Controller and Assistant Treasurer
Steven P. Rindskopf
Corporate VP Human Resources
R. Rand Tucker
VP and General Counsel
INVESTOR INFORMATION
INVESTOR INFORMATION
Shareholder Services
Stock Exchange
Investor Relations and Financial Reports
Inquiries regarding the Dividend Reinvestment Plan,
La-Z-Boy Incorporated common shares are traded on the
We will provide the Form 10-K to any shareholder who
dividend payments, stock transfer requirements, address
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol LZB.
requests it. Security analysts, shareholders and investors
changes and account consolidations should be addressed to
the company’s stock transfer agent and registrar:
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
800-937-5449
www.amstock.com/main
Corporate Headquarters
La‑Z‑Boy Incorporated
1284 North Telegraph Road
Monroe, MI 48162
734-242-1444
www.la-z-boy.com
may request information from:
Investor Relations
La‑Z‑Boy Incorporated
1284 North Telegraph Road
Monroe, MI 48162
investorrelations@la-z-boy.com
734-241-2438
©2012 La-Z-Boy Incorporated. Except as noted, all designated trademarks and service marks utilized in this report are owned by La-Z-Boy Incorporated or its subsidiary companies.
Shareholders’ Meeting
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
11:00 AM EDT
La‑Z‑Boy Auditorium
1284 North Telegraph Road
Monroe, Michigan USA
Shown: Keagan Chair & Leo Ottoman
Front Cover: Allegra Chairs & Demi Sofas
2012 AnnuAL RepoRt
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
FAMILYcomfortCOMMUNITYDURABILITYINNOVATIONmade inamericacustomizationqual-communityheritageCUSTOMfamilyQUALITYtogetherLOYALTYfamily
T O O U R S H A R E H O L D E R S
On March 24, 1927, two young cousins from
Monroe, Michigan, Edward Knabusch and Edwin
Shoemaker (“the two Eds”), founded a company that
would become La-Z-Boy Incorporated. As we celebrate
the company’s 85th anniversary this year, and reflect
upon its long and successful history, we are proud
that the values instilled by our founders remain with
us to this day and permeate our total business. These
include integrity, focus on family and community,
and an intense commitment to always do the right
thing. And these bedrock principles, when paired
with
focus, operational
customer
excellence and brand strength, have enabled La-Z-Boy
to endure some exceedingly difficult times and led
us to our current solid leadership position within the
furniture industry. Today, our business model is as
strong as ever, built upon a solid platform of brand
strength and a strong and growing network of
proprietary distribution,
supported by efficient
production and supply chain management.
innovation,
Our business was certainly tested in the recent
past. In fact, our industry went through a complete
transformation over the past dozen years, with
much of the supply chain moving offshore while
macroeconomic challenges fueled a rapidly changing
distribution landscape in North America. But with
change comes opportunity and La-Z-Boy embraced the
challenges set before it and emerged from this period
as a much stronger company.
The strategic initiatives and changes we implemented
over the past five-plus years have gained traction
and are increasingly evident in our operating results.
For fiscal 2012, we reported sales of $1.2 billion,
an increase of about 6% over fiscal 2011, on a
comparable 52-week year (fiscal 2011 included 53
weeks). And, we doubled our operating profit. At the
same time, by operating in a fiscally conservative
manner, we strengthened our balance sheet and ended
the fiscal year with $152 million in cash, a $37 million
increase from last year, and less than $10 million of
debt. This provides us with significant flexibility and
maneuverability as we move into the next chapter of
our corporate history. Although we are pleased with
our performance, it is just the beginning of a promising
future where we are strongly committed to three key
objectives: profitable growth, improving our integrated
retail strategy, and operational excellence.
P R O F I TA B L E G R O W T H
After years of restructuring, which included selling
companies, consolidating facilities and changing our
operating structure to ensure our competitiveness
within the industry, we are turning all our energies
to growing the company. And that focus starts with
La-Z-Boy®, our flagship brand, which has proven
to provide the best return of all our businesses and
continues to serve as the company’s growth engine.
Today, our standing in the marketplace is strong –
La-Z-Boy is the best-known brand in the industry and
we boast a strong and growing distribution network
of more than 850 branded outlets composed of
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores and Comfort
Studios®
Importantly, we are making
investments to fuel the company’s growth: we are
investing in our brand platform, have introduced a
vibrant and award-winning new store concept, are
dedicated to expanding our store system within North
America and are expanding La-Z-Boy’s reach globally.
At the same time, we continue to innovate and build
an infrastructure to support our growth.
locations.
We are proud that the values instilled by our founders
remain with us to this day and permeate our total business.
la-z-boy.com
1
FA IdurabilityQUALITYcommunityCOMMUN YinnovationINNOVATIONCOMFORTAMERICAMADE INqualitycustomizationfamily TO O U R S H A R E H O L D E R S, c o n t i n u e d
16% RETAIL
the
store’s
complimentary
Eighteen months ago, we launched our “Live life
comfortably” campaign,
featuring Brooke Shields
as our brand ambassador. The focus of the brand
platform is to communicate to the consumer that
La-Z-Boy offers more than our iconic recliner – we
have a full range and selection of great-looking sofas,
sectionals, occasional chairs, ottomans and accessories.
The campaign also champions the La-Z-Boy Furniture
Galleries® store as a place to enjoy a comfortable
and differentiated shopping experience and
highlights
In-Home Design Program. We’ve been
pleased with the performance of the
overall campaign with Brooke as our
spokesperson. As a result, we recently
extended our contract with her, as
we believe the continuity associated
with the campaign and the momentum
we are building will drive our continued
growth.
Indeed, the brand platform
delivering results – our sales of living room and
stationary furniture have increased, growing
at twice the rate of our core motion furniture
offering. And, due to the campaign’s success, we will
increase our national TV advertising this coming year,
which is being implemented in cooperation with our
dealers. They, too, see the effectiveness of the campaign
and are eager to invest along with us to continue
its momentum.
11%
CASEGOODS
is
In August 2011, we introduced a new store concept and
opened two stores in the new format in the Providence,
Rhode Island market. The stores have a more modern
and inspiring look and feel, and are designed to enable
the consumer to more easily navigate her way through
the store, which is organized by style categories, rather
than by specific room or product type. Additionally,
the format is designed to enable us to increase the
average transaction per consumer by enhancing the
look of the furniture and highlighting the customization
opportunities available.
2
2012 ANNUA L REPORT
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
73% UPHOLSTERY
FISCAL 2012
SALES MIX
After opening the initial stores, we made some
adjustments to the design and opened new concept
stores in Chicago and St. Louis and plans are underway
for additional stores. Importantly, our dealers are excited
by the new format and the potential it offers and,
going forward, it will be phased in throughout the 300-
plus La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® store network. We
were delighted this past winter when Chain Store Age
magazine announced the winners of its 30th annual
Retail Store of the Year Design Competition and
our Warwick, Rhode Island La-Z-Boy Furniture
Galleries® store won an award in the “Hard
Lines, under 15,000 square feet” category,
a testament to the on-trend design of our
new concept format.
Investing in our store system is paramount
to our growth as we believe branded,
or proprietary, distribution offers the best
means to reach the consumer to give her a
comprehensive product offering and compelling
and inspiring shopping experience. While the new
concept design is one element of that investment,
another is increasing our store base to better penetrate
North America. Today, there are 312 La-Z-Boy Furniture
Galleries® stores, and our market data indicate the
North American market would support another 75 to
100 stores. While some existing locales need additional
stores or relocations to leverage the demographic
potential, other markets have yet to be tapped. Both
the company and our independent dealer base have
plans to open additional stores and we are actively and
aggressively scouting locations.
We are continuously enhancing our already strong online
presence, making it easier for consumers to browse our
broad range and selection of furniture, use our interactive
design and room planning tools and visualize their
selections before they buy with photorealistic fabric-and-
frame rendering. Based on our research, the majority of
consumers interested in purchasing furniture spend a lot
of time looking online for ideas and information before
and after they actually visit a furniture store.
FAMILYcomfortcommunityDURABILITYinnovationmade in americaQUALITYcustomizationfamilyCOMMUNITY16%11%73%
Whether it’s through our website, Facebook presence
or a mobile device, we are showcasing our product
offering while educating consumers and giving them a
rewarding online experience. Although consumers are
able to purchase our furniture online and that business
is increasing yearly, most prefer to visit our stores after
perusing our website to actually “touch” and “feel”
the furniture. This, in turn, gives us an opportunity to
work more closely with consumers on an individual
basis to provide a professional
and
shopping
experience, complete with
our complimentary In-Home
Design service. Going forward,
we believe all of our interactive
destinations and tools will
only increase in importance in the furniture shopping
process and we are fully committed to ensuring these
mediums play a strong role in our integrated marketing
communications over time.
pleasant
Accelerating our international expansion is another
important element of our growth strategy. We have
already built a significant La-Z-Boy presence in several
markets around the world including Australia, New
Zealand, the United Kingdom, Korea and Thailand,
among others. In fact, today we sell product in 43
countries. We are interested in maximizing our presence
in those core markets in which we already operate and
where the La-Z-Boy brand has developed significant
recognition, and in the emerging and developing
markets in the world where motion furniture is not as
well known and where we have an opportunity to enter
early in the markets’ evolution, such as China.
This past March, we announced a strategic licensing
agreement with Kuka Home, one of China’s largest
stationary upholstery producers and retailers, to roll out
the La-Z-Boy brand and stores across mainland China,
a huge and rapidly growing market for furniture, and
home to almost 20% of the world’s population. The
partnership is focused on developing, manufacturing,
distributing and retailing La-Z-Boy® motion products and
plans are underway to open, over the next few years,
several hundred La-Z-Boy stores throughout China, to be
owned and run by Kuka. Joining forces with a capable
and experienced local partner – who understands and
is able to navigate the local market – has served us well
in the past in other markets and we believe Kuka will
prove to be a great partner for us. We will commit more
resources to our international strategy allowing us to
accelerate the development of additional opportunities
and provide support to grow our existing businesses
around the world.
Innovation has always played a key role in the success
of our company. Indeed, it was 85 years ago that
Whether it’s through our website, Facebook
presence or a mobile device, we are showcasing
our product offering while educating consumers
and giving them a rewarding online experience.
our founders set up shop in a garage and developed
the wood-slat reclining chair. Shortly thereafter, they
upholstered it and, in 1961, they developed our
proprietary rocker-recliner mechanism, and the recliner
as we know it was born. La-Z-Boy has always been at
the forefront of reclining technology – from the original
Reclina-Rocker® recliner to today’s PowerReclineXR™
chair – and our research and development team
continues its quest to find additional ways to improve the
comfort and durability of our products while developing
new ones to meet the varying needs of consumers.
Finally, we continue to invest in our company’s
infrastructure, as a strong foundation will provide for
efficiencies in everything we do internally and throughout
every touch point with our dealers and consumers.
Over the past several years, we have invested in, and
are currently implementing, a state-of-the-art Enterprise
Resource Planning (ERP) system, which allows for the
smooth flow of data throughout the organization
using standardized and integrated processes. Due
to the complexity of the system and the expense
associated with ERP, it is being phased in over several
years. Once complete, all production activity – from
order entry to manufacturing to financial systems – will
be automated for La-Z-Boy, our largest division, with a
robust system that will support the growth of the
organization for years to come.
I M P R OV I N G I N T E G R AT E D R E TA I L S T R AT E G Y
A number of years ago, in the midst of the many changes
occurring throughout our industry, we made the
la-z-boy.com
3
TO O U R S H A R E H O L D E R S, c o n t i n u e d
decision to develop an integrated retail strategy. In
addition to allowing us to stay close to our customers
and end consumers while maintaining and building a
vibrant retail system, it also gives us the opportunity to
make money on both sides of the business – wholesale
and retail. Indeed, with macroeconomic headwinds, it
has been a struggle recently, but our hard work is paying
off. Today, our company-owned retail operation consists
of 85 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores and is one
of the most exciting facets of our organization, while
key to our integrated retail strategy with its focus on
branded/proprietary distribution.
O P E R AT I O N A L E X C E L L E N C E
The steps we have taken over the last few years to
increase volume throughout our business are bearing
fruit and we believe we are well positioned to capitalize
on a strengthening economy. But driving growth is
only one part of the equation. The ability to earn more
money on additional sales is critical to increasing the
value of our company. We believe the lean and efficient
operating structure we have established will enable us
to achieve a “profitable conversion” or, in other words,
allow us to earn a higher profit on the incremental sales
than we did on the base sales.
Over the last three-and-a-half years, we made significant
changes to the retail operation and those changes,
coupled with the “Live life comfortably” brand platform,
which is driving more-qualified and higher-spending
consumers to our store system, have yielded results. With
13 consecutive quarters of performance improvement,
this business is well on its way to profitability and, once
there, is set to provide the corporation with significant
earnings power.
Going forward, with the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries®
store system playing a key role in our growth strategy,
we plan to increase the
number of company-owned
stores. In a few existing
locales, we will add stores to
ensure we effectively cover
each market while leveraging the fixed-cost structure of
the operation. There are also opportunities to expand
into new markets. For example, we recently signed
leases to open three stores in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
a robust market with great promise, and one in which
we have not had a presence for several years. We are
confident our retail segment has the right strategy and
structure in place and are steadily moving this business
to profitability.
On the manufacturing side of our business, the
cellular production process instituted throughout our
La-Z-Boy branded facilities has increased production
speed and quality while reducing costs. Moreover, our
Mexico-based cut-and-sew operation has ramped up
its production levels to service current business needs,
and we are pleased with the operation’s output and
the cost savings it is delivering. In addition to
efficiencies garnered through these initiatives, the
operations support our brand promise to the consumer –
custom furniture with quick delivery – an offering that
differentiates our company in the marketplace and
one we believe will help
drive growth. Our other
companies,
upholstery
Bauhaus
England,
and
also are employing lean
initiatives and building their base of customers,
while serving new markets and contributing to
our performance.
While our casegoods business has become smaller
over the past several years, particularly since the 2008
recession when consumers postponed more casegoods
purchases due to the more expensive nature of dining
and bedroom sets, it is a strategic fit for our long-term
business opportunities. In addition to servicing a wide
Accelerating our international
expansion is another important
element of our growth strategy.
4
2012 ANNUA L REPORT
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
FAMILYdurabilityQUALITYcommunityCOMMUNITYinnovationinnovationINNOVATIONCOMFORTAMERICAMADE INqualitycustomizationfamily environmental steward to ensure our operations do not
impact future generations in a negative manner. I am
certain “the two Eds” would be happy with all that we
do to support those in need and the values associated
with our charitable outreach will always be a part of
who we are.
The past 85 years have been remarkable. Our founders
were not only inventors, but were visionaries. They
created a chair for comfort and today that attribute
remains one of our most important and best-known
assets, with our team consistently striving to improve the
comfort experience for the consumer. I am proud of our
team and those who came before us for propelling our
company over decades of change. We’ve strengthened
our company over time and our brand remains the best
known in the industry. While our chair is iconic, our
broad line of furniture offers much potential for the
future. It’s difficult to predict what the next 85 years will
bring to La-Z-Boy Incorporated, but I am confident they
will be rewarding for all.
I would like to thank our employees, Board of Directors,
shareholders, customers and suppliers for their ongoing
commitment to our company over this past year.
Kurt L. Darrow
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
and diverse customer base, La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries®
stores benefit from carrying our wood occasional
pieces which complement our upholstered furniture.
Further, our designers are able to leverage the various
casegoods groups for In-Home Design work, providing
opportunities for us to furnish other rooms in the home.
And, with the majority of our casegoods line competing
in the mid to upper-middle price point, as the economy
improves, we believe we are well positioned through
our product offering, customer base and floor space,
to capitalize on those consumers beginning to consider
more aspirational purchases. At this point, we continue
to import about 75% of our casegoods product
from Asia and have one remaining manufacturing
facility in Hudson, North Carolina that is producing
bedroom furniture.
to
the
C O R P O R AT E S O C I A L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y
And, finally, a word about our commitment to the
communities in which we operate. Giving back to
local communities was at the forefront of “the two
Eds’” business philosophy and that remains part of
the fabric of our company today. All of our operations
support their local communities in some format. From
the La-Z-Boy Foundation to local Ronald McDonald
Houses®
sustainability efforts employed
throughout our facilities, our goal is to support those
around us. Our Foundation gives to the United Way,
health and human service agencies, educational entities
and other public organizations. Additionally, La-Z-Boy
is honored to support the Ronald McDonald House
Charities®, our national charity of choice, to provide
comfort to families at a time in their lives when they
need it the most. And, our individual employees spend
countless hours volunteering for various organizations,
which is, again, part of the fiber of who we are. With
respect to our sustainability efforts, our goal is to be an
The past 85 years have been remarkable.
Our founders were not only inventors,
but were visionaries.
la-z-boy.com
5
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended April 28, 2012
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9656
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MICHIGAN
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
1284 North Telegraph Road, Monroe, Michigan
(Address of principal executive offices)
38-0751137
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
48162-3390
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (734) 242-1444
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, $1.00 Par Value
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:3)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer,’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer □
Accelerated filer (cid:3)
Non-accelerated filer □
Smaller reporting company □
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)
Based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on October 28, 2011, the aggregate market value of Registrant’s
common shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on that date was $551.7 million.
The number of common shares outstanding of the Registrant was 52,132,606 as of June 12, 2012.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
(1) Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Regulation 14A for its 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART I
Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1A. Risk Factors
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
. . . . . . . .
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page
Number(s)
2
3
9
12
12
12
12
13
14
17
19
34
35
64
64
64
65
65
65
65
65
66
Note: The responses to Items 10 through 14 will be included in the Company’s definitive proxy statement to
be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The required information is
incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to that document and is not repeated herein.
1
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
La-Z-Boy Incorporated and its subsidiaries (individually and collectively, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘our’’ or the ‘‘Company’’)
makes forward-looking statements in this report, and its representatives may make oral forward-looking
statements from time to time. Generally, forward-looking statements include information concerning possible
or assumed future actions, events or results of operations. More specifically, forward-looking statements may
include information regarding:
— future income, margins and cash flows
— future growth
— adequacy and cost of financial resources
— future economic performance
— industry and importing trends
— management plans
Forward-looking statements also include those preceded or followed by the words ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘believes,’’
‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘hopes,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘intends’’ and ‘‘expects’’ or similar expressions. With respect to all
forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements
contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Actual results could differ materially from those we anticipate or project due to a number of factors,
including: (a) changes in consumer confidence and demographics; (b) speed of recovery from the recent
economic recession or the emergence of a second wave of the recession; (c) changes in the real estate and
credit markets and their effects on our customers and suppliers; (d) international political unrest, terrorism or
war; (e) volatility in energy and other commodities prices; (f) the impact of logistics on imports; (g) interest
rate and currency exchange rate changes; (h) operating factors, such as supply, labor or distribution
disruptions; (i) any court actions requiring us to return our share of certain Continued Dumping and Subsidy
Offset Act distributions; (j) changes in the domestic or international regulatory environment; (k) adoption of
new accounting principles; (l) severe weather or other natural events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding,
tornadoes and tsunamis; (m) our ability to procure fabric rolls and leather hides or cut-and-sewn fabric and
leather sets domestically or abroad; (n) fluctuations in our stock price; (o) information technology conversions
or system failures; (p) effects of our brand awareness and marketing programs; (q) the discovery of defects in
our products resulting in delays in manufacturing, recall campaigns, reputational damage, or increased
warranty costs; (r) litigation arising out of alleged defects in our products; (s) our ability to locate new
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores owners and negotiate favorable lease terms for new or existing locations;
and (t) those matters discussed in Item 1A of this Annual Report and other factors identified from time-to-time
in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether to reflect new information or new developments or for any
other reason.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Edward M. Knabusch and Edwin J. Shoemaker started Floral City Furniture in 1927, and in 1928 the newly
formed company introduced its first recliner. In 1941, we were incorporated as La-Z-Boy Chair Company in
the state of Michigan, and in 1996 our name was changed to La-Z-Boy Incorporated. Today, our La-Z-Boy
brand is the most recognized brand in the furniture industry as we celebrate our 85th anniversary as
a company.
La-Z-Boy Incorporated manufactures, markets, imports, distributes and retails upholstery products, accessories
and casegoods (wood) furniture products. We are the leading global producer of reclining chairs, the second
largest manufacturer/distributor of residential furniture in the United States according to the May 2012 Top
sources for the U.S. Furniture Market in Furniture Today, and the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores retail
network is the second largest retailer of single-branded upholstered furniture in North America according to
the May 2012 Top 100 ranking by Furniture Today. We have nine major North American manufacturing
locations to support our speed to market and customization strategy. We sell our products, primarily in the
United States and Canada, to furniture retailers and directly to consumers through company-owned stores.
The centerpiece of our retail distribution strategy is our network of 312 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores
and 553 Comfort Studios(cid:5), each dedicated to marketing our La-Z-Boy branded products. We consider this
dedicated space to be ‘‘proprietary.’’ We own and operate 85 of the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores.
The remainder of the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores, as well as all 553 Comfort Studios(cid:5), are
independently owned and operated. La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores help consumers furnish their homes
by combining the style, comfort and quality of La-Z-Boy furniture with our in-home design service. Comfort
Studios(cid:5) are defined spaces within larger independent retailers that are dedicated to displaying La-Z-Boy
branded products. In addition to the La-Z-Boy Comfort Studios(cid:5), our Kincaid, England and Lea operating
units have their own dedicated in-store gallery programs with over 700 outlets and 2.0 million square feet of
proprietary floor space. In total, our proprietary floor space includes approximately 9.3 million square feet.
Principal Products and Industry Segments
Our reportable segments are the Upholstery segment, the Casegoods segment and the Retail segment.
In terms of revenue, our largest segment is the Upholstery segment, which consists of
Upholstery Segment.
three operating units, La-Z-Boy, our largest operating unit, as well as the Bauhaus and England operating
units. The Upholstery segment manufactures or imports upholstered furniture such as recliners and motion
furniture, sofas, loveseats, chairs, ottomans and sleeper sofas. The Upholstery segment sells directly to
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores, operators of Comfort Studios(cid:5), major dealers and other
independent retailers.
Casegoods Segment. Our Casegoods segment is an importer, marketer, manufacturer and distributor of
casegoods (wood) furniture such as bedroom sets, dining room sets, entertainment centers and accent pieces,
as well as some coordinated upholstered furniture. The Casegoods segment consists of two operating units,
one consisting of American Drew, Lea and Hammary, and the second being Kincaid. The Casegoods segment
primarily sells to major dealers and other independent retailers.
Retail Segment. Our Retail segment consists of 85 company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores
located in nine markets ranging from the Midwest to the east coast of the United States and also including
southeastern Florida and southern California. The Retail segment primarily sells upholstered furniture, as well
as some casegoods and other accessories, to end consumers through the retail network.
Additional detailed information regarding our segments and the products which compose the segments is
contained in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements and our ‘‘Management’s Discussion and
Analysis’’ section, both of which are included in this report.
Raw Materials and Parts
The principal raw materials for the Upholstery segment are purchased cover (primarily fabrics and leather),
polyester batting and non-chlorofluorocarbonated polyurethane foam for cushioning and padding, lumber and
plywood for frames and steel for motion mechanisms, which together total about 85% of the segment’s total
3
upholstery material costs. We purchase about 70% of our polyurethane foam from one supplier, although this
supplier has several facilities across the United States which ship to our plants. The largest raw material cost
of the Upholstery segment is purchased cover, which represents about 41% of the segment’s total material
costs. Although we purchase cover from a variety of sources, we do rely on a limited number of major
suppliers. If one of these major suppliers experienced financial or other difficulties we could experience
temporary disruptions in our manufacturing process until an alternate supplier could be obtained.
Our cover is purchased either in a raw state (a roll or hide), then cut and sewn into parts or purchased as
cut-and-sewn parts from third-party offshore suppliers. Our cover material costs are evenly divided between
fabric rolls and hides and cut-and-sewn parts. There are four primary suppliers of cut-and-sewn leather and
fabric products. Of the products we import from China, one supplier manufactures over half of the leather
cut-and-sewn sets and one supplier manufactures over half of the fabric products.
For fiscal 2013, we expect raw material costs to rise due to increased global demand for steel, leather, wood,
yarn and polyurethane, as well as other materials used in our upholstery manufacturing processes.
Additionally, costs associated with our shipping and transportation activities are sensitive to changes in crude
oil pricing.
As the Casegoods segment is an importer, marketer, manufacturer and distributor of casegoods furniture, raw
materials represent only about 12% of the total inventory of this segment. The principal raw materials used by
our manufacturing facility within our Casegoods segment are hardwoods, plywood and chip wood, veneers
and liquid stains, paints and finishes and decorative hardware. Hardwood lumber and purchased hardwood
components represent about 42% of this segment’s total material costs.
Finished Goods Imports
The majority of finished wood furniture marketed and distributed by our Casegoods segment is imported. This
import model for our Casegoods segment is effective primarily due to the low labor and overhead costs
associated with manufacturing casegoods product overseas. We have continued to make changes to our model
in order to improve our service performance levels by improving our supply chain management and
distribution networks.
During fiscal 2012, prices on imported casegoods increased due to inflationary pressures in Asia resulting
from increases in labor and raw material costs. We expect these price increases to continue in fiscal 2013,
along with increased transportation costs.
Sales of imported casegoods finished goods represented about 75% and 77% of our total casegoods sales for
fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. Sales of imported finished goods, for all our segments, represented
approximately 10% and 12% of our fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 consolidated sales, respectively.
Seasonal Business
We believe that the demand for furniture generally reflects sensitivity to overall economic conditions,
including, consumer confidence, housing market conditions and unemployment rates. Historically, our
Upholstery segment and Retail segment have experienced lower levels of sales during the first half of our
fiscal year and higher levels during the second half. Our Casegoods segment historically has experienced a
lower level of sales during the first quarter of our fiscal year and a higher level during our second fiscal
quarter. We believe variations to these historical patterns are a result of economic conditions during those
periods and not a change in our historical patterns.
During fiscal 2012, our Upholstery segment experienced its highest level of sales during our fourth fiscal
quarter, our Casegoods segment experienced its highest level of sales during our second fiscal quarter and our
Retail segment experienced their highest level of sales during our third fiscal quarter. All three segments
experienced their lowest level of sales for fiscal 2012 during our first fiscal quarter.
When possible, we schedule production to maintain uniform manufacturing activity throughout the year. We
shut down our domestic plants for a week in July to perform routine maintenance on our equipment.
4
Economic Cycle and Purchasing Cycle
In terms of our product segments, upholstered furniture has a shorter life cycle and exhibits a less volatile
sales pattern over an economic cycle than does casegoods. This is because upholstered furniture is typically
more fashion and design oriented, and is often purchased one or two pieces at a time. In contrast, casegoods
products are longer-lived and frequently purchased in groupings or ‘‘suites,’’ resulting in a much larger cost to
the consumer.
Practices Regarding Working Capital Items
The following describes our significant practices regarding working capital items.
Inventory: We do not carry significant amounts of upholstered finished goods in inventory at our
manufacturing locations as these goods are primarily built to order. However, we generally build or import
casegoods inventory to stock, in order to attain manufacturing efficiencies and/or to meet delivery
requirements of customers. This results in higher levels of finished goods inventory for our casegoods
products than our upholstery products as a percentage of sales. Our company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture
Galleries(cid:5) stores maintain finished goods inventory at the stores for display purposes.
Over the past several years we have opened five regional distribution centers. We created these distribution
centers to streamline the warehousing and distribution processes for our La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) store
network, including both company-owned stores and independently owned stores. Our move to regional
distribution centers allowed us to reduce the number of individual warehouses needed to supply our retail
outlets and helped us reduce our inventory levels.
During fiscal 2012 our inventory levels increased $5.3 million compared to fiscal 2011, but only increased
slightly as a percentage of sales. We will continue to manage our inventory levels to make sure they are in
line with sales levels, while maintaining our focus on service to our customers.
Accounts Receivable: During fiscal 2012 our accounts receivables increased $5.9 million compared to fiscal
2011, but receivables as a percentage of sales were flat. We continue to monitor our customers’ accounts and
limit our exposure and credit support to certain independent dealers.
Accounts Payable: During fiscal 2012 our accounts payable increased $7.1 million compared to fiscal 2011,
primarily due to increased raw material inventory in our Upholstery segment.
Customers
Our customers are furniture retailers primarily located throughout the United States and Canada. Additionally,
we sell to a number of furniture retailers outside of North America. We also sell to consumers through our
company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores. We did not have any single customer whose purchases
amounted to more than 3% of our consolidated or Upholstery segment sales in fiscal 2012, or more than 6%
of our Casegoods segment’s sales in fiscal 2012. Sales in our Upholstery and Casegoods segments are almost
entirely to furniture retailers. Sales in our Retail segment are to end-consumers.
We have formal agreements with many furniture retailers for them to display and merchandise products from
one or more of our operating units and sell them to consumers in dedicated retail space, either in stand-alone
stores or dedicated galleries or studios within their stores. We consider this dedicated space to be
‘‘proprietary’’. For our Upholstery and Casegoods segments, our 2012 customer mix based on sales was about
57% proprietary, 11% major dealers (for example, Art Van Furniture, Berkshire Hathaway, Havertys Furniture,
and Raymour & Flanigan Furniture) and 32% other independent retailers.
As of April 28, 2012, our network included 312 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores and 553 Comfort
Studios(cid:5), each dedicated to marketing our La-Z-Boy branded products. We own 85 stand-alone La-Z-Boy
Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores. The remainder of the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores, as well as all 553
Comfort Studios(cid:5), are independently owned and operated. Comfort Studios(cid:5) are defined spaces within larger
independent retailers that are dedicated to displaying La-Z-Boy branded products. In addition to the La-Z-Boy
Comfort Studios(cid:5), our Kincaid, England and Lea operating units have their own dedicated in-store gallery
programs with over 700 outlets and 2.0 million square feet of proprietary floor space. In total, our proprietary
floor space includes approximately 9.3 million square feet.
5
The success of our product distribution relies heavily on having retail floor space that is dedicated to
displaying and marketing our products. This distribution system originated with our La-Z-Boy Furniture
Galleries(cid:5) stores network, which continues to have the largest number of proprietary stores and galleries
among our other operating units. According to the May 2012 Top 100 ranking by Furniture Today, an industry
trade publication, the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores retail network is the second largest retailer of
single-brand upholstered furniture in North America.
Maintaining, updating, and expanding, when appropriate, our proprietary distribution network is a key part of
our overall sales and marketing strategy. As we continue to maintain and update our current stores, the
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) store network plans to open, relocate or remodel 10 to 15 stores during fiscal
2013. A majority of these new stores will feature the new concept store design recently developed and
debuted in Warwick, RI. We select independent dealers for our proprietary distribution network based on
factors such as the management and financial qualifications of those potential dealers as well as the potential
for distribution in a specific geographical area. This proprietary method of distribution is beneficial to
La-Z-Boy, our dealers and the consumer. For La-Z-Boy, it allows us to have a concentration of marketing of
our product by sales personnel dedicated to our entire product line, and only that line. For dealers who join
this proprietary group, it allows them to take advantage of practices that have proven successful based on past
experiences of other proprietary dealers. As a part of this, we facilitate forums and communications for these
dealers to share best practices among their peers. For our consumers, these stores provide a full-service
shopping experience with knowledgeable sales associates and in-home design consultants to support their
purchasing process. The La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores’ independent dealers and the Comfort Studios(cid:5)
retailers are responsible for displaying and merchandising our product within the dedicated retail space.
Orders and Backlog
The measure of backlog at a point in time may not be indicative of our future sales performance, therefore we
do not rely entirely on backlogs to predict future sales. For most operating units, an order cannot be canceled
after it has been selected for production. Upholstery orders are primarily built to a specific dealer order (stock
order) or a special order with a down payment from a consumer (sold orders). Casegoods are primarily
produced to our internal order (not a customer or consumer order), which results in higher finished goods
inventory on hand as a percentage of sales.
As of April 28, 2012 and April 30, 2011, our Upholstery segment backlogs were approximately $69.7 million
and $73.2 million, respectively. Our Casegoods segment backlogs as of April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011,
were approximately $14.0 million and $12.3 million, respectively.
Competitive Conditions
According to the May 2012 Top Sources for the U.S. Furniture Market in Furniture Today, we are currently
the second largest manufacturer/distributor of residential (living and family room, bedroom, and dining room)
furniture in the United States, as measured by annual sales volume.
In the Upholstery segment, our largest competitors are Ashley, Bassett Furniture, Bernhardt, Ethan Allen,
Flexsteel, Furniture Brands International, Klaussner, Natuzzi, and Palliser.
In the Casegoods segment, our main competitors are Ashley, Bernhardt, Ethan Allen, Furniture Brands
International, Hooker Furniture, Stanley Furniture, and Universal. Additionally, the Casegoods segment faces
market pressures related to foreign manufacturers entering the United States market, as well as by increased
direct purchasing from overseas by some of the larger United States retailers.
The La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores operate in the retail furniture industry throughout North America;
consequently, they have different competitors. La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores competitors include:
Ashley, Bassett Furniture Direct, Ethan Allen, Thomasville Home Furnishings Stores, several other regional
competitors (for example Art Van Furniture, Raymour & Flanigan Furniture, and Havertys Furniture), and
family-owned independent furniture stores.
In addition to the larger competitors listed above, a substantial number of small and medium-sized firms
operate within our business segments, all of which are highly competitive.
6
Over the past decade there has been an increase in alternative distribution channels affecting our retail
markets. Companies such as Costco, Home Depot, IKEA, Sam’s Club, Target, Wal-Mart, Williams Sonoma
and others are now offering products that compete with some of our product lines. Also, increased ability to
purchase furniture products on-line through various furniture manufacturers’ and retailers’ websites has
increased competition.
We believe the home furnishings industry competes primarily on the basis of product styling and quality,
customer service (product availability and delivery), and price. We believe La-Z-Boy Incorporated competes
on the basis of each of these factors, specifically through our distribution models, marketing and
customization capabilities.
We compete primarily by emphasizing our brand and the value, comfort, quality, and styling of our products.
In addition, we remain committed to innovation within the furniture industry while striving to provide
outstanding customer service, exceptional dealer support, and efficient on-time delivery. Also, maintaining,
updating and expanding as appropriate, our proprietary distribution system is a key initiative for us in striving
to remain competitive with others in the furniture industry. We compete in the mid-to-upper-mid price point in
the furniture industry. A shift in consumer taste and trends to lower price point products could negatively
affect our competitive position.
Research and Development Activities
We provide information regarding our research and development activities in Note 1 to our consolidated
financial statements, which is included in Item 8 of this report.
Trademarks, Licenses and Patents
We own several trademarks including La-Z-Boy, our most valuable. The La-Z-Boy trademark is essential to
the upholstery and retail segments of our business. To protect our trademarks, we have registered them in the
United States and various other countries where our products are sold. These trademarks have a perpetual life,
subject to renewal every ten years. We license the use of the La-Z-Boy trademark to our major international
partners and dealers outside of North America. We also license the use of the La-Z-Boy trademark on contract
office furniture, outdoor furniture and on non-furniture products in the United States for the purpose of
enhancing brand awareness, broadening the perceptions of La-Z-Boy and creating visibility of the La-Z-Boy
brand in channels outside of the furniture industry. In addition, we license to our proprietary dealers the right
to use our La-Z-Boy trademark in connection with the sale of our products and related services, on their signs,
and in other ways, which we consider to be a key part of our marketing strategies. We provide more
information about those dealers above, under ‘‘Customers.’’
We hold a number of patents that we actively enforce, but we believe that the loss of any single patent or
group of patents would not significantly affect our business.
Compliance with Environmental Regulations
Our manufacturing operations involve the use and disposal of certain substances regulated under
environmental protection laws, and we are involved in a small number of remediation actions and site
investigations concerning such substances. Based on a review of all currently known facts and our experience
with previous environmental matters, we believe we have adequate reserves in respect of probable and
reasonably estimable losses arising from environmental matters and currently do not anticipate any
significant loss.
Employees
We employed approximately 8,160 full-time equivalent employees as of April 28, 2012. The Upholstery
segment employed approximately 6,910, the Casegoods segment employed approximately 475, the Retail
segment employed approximately 580, with the remainder being corporate personnel. The majority of our
employees are employed on a full-time basis. As of April 30, 2011, we had approximately 7,910 full-time
equivalent employees.
7
Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
In fiscal 2012, our direct export sales, including sales in Canada, were approximately 13.1% of our total sales.
We have a manufacturing joint venture in Thailand, which distributes furniture in Australia, New Zealand,
Thailand and other countries in Asia. In addition, we have a sales and marketing joint venture in Asia, which
sells and distributes furniture in Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and Malaysia, among other Asian countries.
We also have a facility in Mexico which provides cut-and-sewn fabric sets for our domestic upholstery
manufacturing facilities. Information about sales in the United States, Canada, and other countries is contained
in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements, which is included in Item 8 of this report. Our net
property, plant, and equipment in the United States was $106.0 million and $110.2 million at the end of fiscal
2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. Our net property, plant, and equipment in foreign countries were
$8.4 million and $10.4 million in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively.
See Item 1A of this report for information about the risks related to our foreign operations.
Internet Availability
Available free of charge through our internet website are links to our Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, proxy
statements on Schedule 14A and amendments to those reports. These reports can be found on our internet
website www.la-z-boy.com as soon as reasonably practicable after being electronically filed with, or furnished
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Copies of any materials we file with the SEC can also be
obtained free of charge through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The information on our website is not part
of this report.
8
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Our business is subject to a variety of risks. The risk factors detailed below should be carefully considered in
conjunction with the other information contained in this report. Interest rates, consumer confidence, housing
starts and the overall housing market, increased unemployment, tightening of the financial and consumer credit
markets, downturns in the economy and other general economic factors that affect many other businesses are
particularly significant to us because our principal products are consumer goods.
The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we currently believe may significantly affect our
business. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of or that we do not currently deem
significant may also become important factors that affect us at a later date. The risks and uncertainties
described below should be carefully considered in addition to all other information provided in this document
and our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any of the following risks could
significantly and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The slow pace of recovery from prolonged economic downturn, or any new downturn, could have a
significant negative effect on our sales, results of operations and cash flows.
Our business is subject to international, national and regional economic conditions. The global economy
experienced a major recession beginning in 2008. The pace of recovery has been slow, and the economy of
the United States, which is our principal market, continues to be affected by wavering consumer confidence
and lower home values, prolonged foreclosure activity and a weak housing market, high levels of
unemployment and reduced access to consumer credit. In addition, repercussions from the ongoing European
debt crisis could further damage the U.S. economy. While these factors are outside of our control, they
directly affect our business. The slow pace of recovery, or any new economic downturn could cause our
current and potential customers to delay their purchases or affect their ability to pay, which could reduce our
future sales, results of operations and cash flows.
Our current retail markets and other markets that we enter in the future may not achieve the growth
and profitability we anticipate. We could incur charges for the impairment of long-lived assets if we
cannot meet our earnings expectations for these markets.
We may remodel and relocate existing stores, as well as close underperforming stores. Profitability will
depend on changes in lease rates and increased retail sales justifying the remodeling and relocation costs.
In addition, we may enter new retail markets in the future, including operations at locations where we
currently have independent dealers, and if we do, these markets will be subject to many of the same risks. We
may also incur unforeseen costs upon entry into new markets. If we cannot meet our earnings expectations in
new or existing markets, we may incur charges for the impairment of long-lived assets.
Availability of foreign sourcing and economic uncertainty in countries outside of the United States in
which we operate or from which we purchase product could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
We have operations in countries outside the United States, some of which are located in emerging markets.
Long-term economic and political uncertainty in some of the countries in which we operate, such as Mexico
and Thailand, could result in the disruption of markets and negatively affect our business. Our Casegoods
segment is primarily an importer of products manufactured by foreign sources, mainly in China, and our
Upholstery segment purchases cut-and-sewn fabric and leather sets and some finished goods from Chinese and
other foreign vendors. The majority of the cut-and-sewn leather kits that we purchase from China are from
one supplier. Our sourcing partners may not be able to produce goods in a timely fashion or the quality of
their product may lead us to reject it, causing disruptions in our domestic operations and delays in our
shipments to our customers.
There are other risks that are inherent in our non-U.S. operations, including the potential for changes in
socio-economic conditions, changes in laws and regulations, including import, export, labor and environmental
laws, tariffs and trade barriers, monetary and fiscal policies, investments, taxation, and exchange controls.
Additionally, unsettled political conditions, possible terrorist attacks, organized crime and public health
concerns present a risk to our non-U.S. operations. All of these items could make it more difficult to service
our customers or cause disruptions in our plants that could reduce our sales, earnings, or both in the future.
9
Changes in regulation of our international operations could adversely affect our business and results
of operations.
Because we have operations outside of the United States and sell product in various countries, we are subject
to many laws governing international relations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.S.
Export Administration Act. These laws include prohibitions on improper payments to government officials and
restrictions on where we can do business, what products we can supply to certain countries, and what
information we can provide to certain governments. Violations of these laws, which are complex, may result
in criminal penalties or sanctions that could have a significant adverse effect on our business and results of
operations. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these
laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies.
Fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of raw materials could cause delays that could result
in our inability to provide goods to our customers or could increase our costs, either of which could
decrease our earnings.
In manufacturing furniture, we use various types of wood, fabrics, leathers, upholstered filling material, steel,
and other raw materials. Because we are dependent on outside suppliers for our raw materials, fluctuations in
their price, availability and quality could have a negative effect on our cost of sales and our ability to meet
our customers’ demands. Competitive and marketing pressures may prevent us from passing along price
increases to our customers, and the inability to meet our customers’ demands could cause us to lose sales.
Since we have a higher concentration in upholstery sales (70%) than most of our competitors, the effects of
steel, polyurethane foam, leather and fabric price increases or quantity shortages are more significant for our
business than for most other publicly traded furniture companies. About 70% of our polyurethane foam comes
from one supplier. This supplier has several facilities across the United States, but severe weather or natural
disasters could result in delays in shipments of polyurethane foam to our plants. We have attempted to
minimize this risk by requiring a commitment from our supplier that it would continue to supply us despite
disruptions in its operations.
A change in the financial condition of some of our domestic and foreign fabric suppliers could impede their
ability to provide their products to us in a timely manner. Upholstered furniture is highly fashion oriented, and
if we are not able to acquire sufficient fabric variety, or if we are unable to predict or respond to changes in
fashion trends, we may lose sales and have to sell excess inventory at reduced prices. Doing so would have a
negative effect on our earnings as well as our sales.
Inability to maintain and enhance our brand and respond to changes in our current and potential
customers’ tastes and trends in a timely manner could adversely affect our business and
operating results.
The success of our business depends on our ability to maintain and enhance our brands to increase our
business by retaining customers and attracting new ones. Because furniture product is extremely fashion
oriented, changes in consumers’ tastes and trends and the resultant change in our product mix could adversely
affect our business and operating results. We attempt to minimize these risks by maintaining a strong
advertising and marketing campaign promoting both our brands and our current product designs, styles,
quality and prices. If these efforts are unsuccessful or require us to incur substantial costs, our business,
operating results and financial or competitive condition could be adversely affected.
We rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and manage our
business and that of certain independent dealers. Disruptions in both our primary and back-up systems
could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Our primary and back-up computer systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages,
computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, natural disasters and errors by
employees. Though losses arising from some of these issues would be covered by insurance, interruptions of
our critical business computer systems or failure of our back-up systems could reduce our sales or result in
longer production times. If our critical business computer systems or back-up systems are damaged or cease to
function properly, we may have to make a significant investment to repair or replace them.
10
Loss of market share and other financial or operational difficulties due to competition would likely
result in a decrease in our sales, earnings, and liquidity.
The residential furniture industry is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with many other
manufacturers and retailers, some of which offer widely advertised products, and others of which are large
retail furniture dealers offering their own store-branded products. Competition in the residential furniture
industry is based on quality, style of products, perceived value, pricing, service to the customer, promotional
activities, and advertising. The highly competitive nature of the industry means we are constantly subject to
the risk of losing market share, which would likely decrease our future sales, earnings and liquidity.
In addition, due to the large number of competitors and their wide range of product offerings, we may not be
able to differentiate our products (through styling, finish, and other construction techniques) from those of our
competitors. These and other competitive pressures would likely result in a decrease in our sales, earnings,
and liquidity.
Our business and our reputation could be adversely affected by the failure to protect sensitive employee
data or to comply with evolving regulations relating to our obligation to protect such data.
Cyber attacks designed to gain access to sensitive information by breaching security systems of large
organizations leading to unauthorized release of confidential information have occurred recently at a number
of major U.S. companies despite widespread recognition of the cyber attack threat and improved data
protection methods. While we have invested in the protection of our information technology and maintain
what we believe are adequate security procedures and controls over financial and other employee data, a
breach in our systems that results in the unauthorized release of sensitive data could nonetheless occur and
have a material adverse effect on our reputation and lead to financial losses from remedial actions or potential
liability, including for possible punitive damages. An electronic security breach resulting in the unauthorized
release of sensitive data from our information systems could also materially increase the costs we already
incur to protect against such risks.
11
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
We owned or leased approximately 10.5 million square feet of manufacturing, warehousing and distribution
centers, office, showroom, and retail facilities, and had approximately 1.6 million square feet of idle facilities
at the end of fiscal 2012. Of the 10.5 million square feet occupied at the end of fiscal 2012, our Upholstery
segment occupied approximately 6.5 million square feet, our Casegoods segment occupied approximately
2.0 million square feet, our Retail segment occupied approximately 1.6 million square feet and our Corporate
and Other operations occupied the balance.
Our active facilities are located in Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,
Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington D.C., Wisconsin, Coahuila
(Mexico) and Bangkok (Thailand). All of our plants are well maintained and insured. We do not expect any
major land or building additions will be needed to increase capacity in the foreseeable future for our
manufacturing operations. We own all of our domestic plants, one of which has been financed under long-term
industrial revenue bonds, and our Thailand plant. We lease the majority of our retail stores and regional
distribution centers, as well as our manufacturing facility in Mexico. For information on terms of operating
leases for our properties, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements, which is included in Item 8 of
this report.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Based on a
review of all currently known facts and our experience with previous legal matters, we have recorded expense
in respect of probable and reasonably estimable losses arising from legal matters and currently do not
anticipate any significant additional loss.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
12
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT
Listed below are the names, ages and current positions of our executive officers and, if they have not held
those positions for at least five years, their former positions during that period with us or other companies. All
executive officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.
Kurt L. Darrow, age 57
•
•
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer since August 2011
President and Chief Executive Officer from September 2003 through August 2011
Louis M. Riccio, Jr., age 49
•
•
Senior Vice President of La-Z-Boy and Chief Financial Officer since July 2006
Treasurer from April 2007 through August 2007 and February 2010 through April 2010
Mark S. Bacon, Sr., age 49
•
•
•
Senior Vice President of La-Z-Boy and President of La-Z-Boy Branded Business since July 2011
Senior Vice President of La-Z-Boy and Chief Retail Officer from October 2008 through July 2011
Executive Vice President of Sales, Commercial and Operations of The Pep Boys — Manny, Moe &
Jack from March 2004 through September 2007
Steven M. Kincaid, age 63
•
•
Senior Vice President of La-Z-Boy and President of Casegoods since November 2003
President, Kincaid Furniture Company, Incorporated since June 1983
Otis S. Sawyer, age 54
•
•
•
Senior Vice President of La-Z-Boy and President of Non-Branded Upholstery since February 2008
President, England, Incorporated since February 2008
Senior Vice President Corporate Operations from May 2006 through February 2008
13
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Our board of directors has authorized the purchase of company stock. As of April 28, 2012, 4.9 million shares
remained available for purchase pursuant to this authorization. We purchased 0.5 million shares during fiscal
2012 . During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, pursuant to the existing board authorization, we adopted a
plan to purchase company stock pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The plan
was effective April 30, 2012. Under this plan, our broker has the authority to purchase company shares on our
behalf, subject to SEC regulations and the price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan.
The plan expires at the close of business on August 31, 2012. With the cash flows we anticipate generating in
fiscal 2013 we expect to continue being opportunistic in purchasing company stock.
The following table summarizes our purchases of company stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012:
(shares in thousands)
Fiscal February (January 29 − March 3, 2012). . . .
Fiscal Fourth Quarter of 2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
number of
shares
purchased
48
48
Average
price
paid per
share
$13.78
$13.78
Total number
of shares
purchased as
part of
publicly
announced
plan
48
48
Maximum
number of
shares that
may yet be
purchased
under the
plan
4,853
4,853
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales of unregistered securities during fiscal year 2012.
Equity Plans
The table below provides information concerning our compensation plans under which common shares may be
issued.
Equity Compensation Plan Information as of April 28, 2012
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
(thousands)
(i)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options
(ii)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (i))
(thousands)
(iii)
Plan category
Equity compensation plans approved by
shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,755(1)
$9.33
3,503(2)
Note 1: These options were issued under our 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, 2004 Long-Term Equity Award
Plan and 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan. No additional options can be awarded under the 2004 or 1997
plans, but 0.9 million and 0.4 million options are still outstanding under the 2004 and 1997
plans, respectively.
Note 2: This amount is the aggregate number of shares available for future issuance under our 2010 Omnibus
Incentive Plan. The omnibus incentive plan provides for awards of stock options, restricted stock, and
performance awards (awards of our common stock based on achievement of pre-set goals over a performance
period) to selected key employees and non-employee directors.
14
Performance Graph
The graph below shows the cumulative total return for our last five fiscal years that would have been realized
(assuming reinvestment of dividends) by an investor who invested $100 on April 28, 2007 in our common
shares, in the S&P 500 Composite Index and in the Dow Jones U.S. Furnishings Index.
Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
April 2012
160.00
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
4/28/2007
4/26/2008
4/25/2009
4/24/2010
4/30/2011
4/28/2012
La-Z-Boy Inc.
S&P 500 Index – Total Returns
Dow Jones U.S. Furnishings Index
Company/Index/Market
La-Z-Boy Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 Composite Index . . . . . . . . .
Dow Jones U.S. Furnishings Index . . .
2007
$100
$100
$100
2008
$60.87
$95.40
$69.36
2009
$20.00
$60.70
$45.80
2010
$135.91
$ 87.11
$ 79.48
2011
$108.36
$ 99.57
$ 94.71
2012
$141.35
$104.71
$ 90.68
15
Dividend and Market Information
The New York Stock Exchange is the principal market in which our common stock is traded. The tables
below show the high and low sale prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange during each
quarter of our last two fiscal years.
Fiscal 2012 Quarter Ended
July 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
October 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
January 28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal 2011 Quarter Ended
July 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
October 23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
January 22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
High
$11.84
$11.00
$13.85
$15.44
High
$14.93
$ 9.15
$ 9.50
$11.79
Market Price
Low
$ 8.41
$ 6.76
$ 9.11
$12.96
Market Price
Low
$6.44
$6.47
$7.28
$7.77
Close
$ 8.77
$10.62
$13.73
$15.34
Close
$ 8.65
$ 7.90
$ 8.21
$11.76
We did not pay dividends during fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011. Our credit agreement would prohibit us from
paying dividends or purchasing shares if excess availability, as defined in the agreement, fell below 12.5% of
the revolving credit commitment or we failed to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.05 to 1.00
on a pro forma basis. The agreement would not currently prohibit us from paying dividends or repurchasing
shares. Refer to Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion of our credit
agreement. The payment of future cash dividends is within the discretion of our board of directors and will
depend, among other factors, on our earnings, capital requirements and operating and financial condition, as
well as excess availability under the credit agreement.
Shareholders
We had approximately 13,900 shareholders of record at June 12, 2012.
16
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table presents our selected financial data. The table should be read in conjunction with Item 7,
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This information is
derived from our audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with those statements,
including the related notes.
Consolidated Five-Year Summary of Financial Data
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Gross profit .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Fiscal Year Ended
.
Sales .
.
.
.
Cost of sales .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Selling, general and administrative .
.
Write-down of long-lived assets .
.
.
.
Write-down of trade names .
.
.
.
.
Write-down of goodwill .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Interest expense .
.
.
.
.
.
Interest income.
Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act,
.
.
.
.
Other income (expense), net
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
.
.
Income tax expense (benefit) .
.
Operating income (loss)
.
.
.
.
.
.
Income (loss) from continuing operations .
.
Loss from discontinued operations (net of tax).
.
.
. . . . . .
. . . . .
.
. . . . .
.
. . . . .
.
. . . . .
.
.
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . .
.
Net income (loss) .
taxes.
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
net .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Diluted weighted average shares .
. . . . .
Diluted income (loss) per share from continuing operations. .
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
La-Z-Boy Incorporated .
.
.
.
.
Dividends declared per share .
.
Book value of year-end shares outstanding.
Return on average total equity(1) .
.
.
Gross profit as a percent of sales .
.
.
Operating profit (loss) as a percent of sales .
Effective tax rate(1)
.
.
.
.
Return on sales(1)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Depreciation and amortization .
.
Capital expenditures .
.
.
.
Property, plant and equipment, net .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Working capital
Current ratio(2)
.
Total assets .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Long-term debt, excluding current portion .
.
.
.
.
.
Total debt
.
.
Total equity .
.
.
Debt to equity ratio(3) .
.
.
Debt to capitalization ratio(4) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Shareholders .
.
Employees .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$1,187,143
832,799
354,344
323,964
4,471
—
—
25,909
2,346
944
1,054
405
25,966
8,593
17,373
—
17,373
6,674
24,047
52,279
0.33
$
$
(52 weeks)
4/24/2010
$1,179,212
806,086
373,126
332,698
—
—
—
40,428
2,972
724
4,436
480
43,096
11,737
31,359
—
31,359
1,342
32,701
51,732
0.61
$
$
(52 weeks)
4/25/2009
$1,226,674
888,785
337,889
375,767
7,503
5,541
42,136
(93,058)
5,581
2,504
(52 weeks)
4/26/2008
$1,459,874
1,066,039
393,835
402,383
—
—
8,426
(16,974)
13,899
3,614
8,124
(7,888)
7,147
5,393
(95,899)
26,514
(122,413)
—
(122,413)
(252)
$ (122,665)
51,460
(2.38)
$
(52 weeks)
4/28/2012
$1,231,676
851,819
379,857
330,226
—
—
—
49,631
1,384
611
18,037
(38)
66,857
(22,051)
88,908
—
88,908
(942)
87,966
52,478
1.66
$
$
$
$
$
1.64
$
— $
$
8.46
21.9%
30.8%
4.0%
(33.0)%
7.2%
0.45
$
— $
$
6.96
0.62
$
— $
$
6.56
4.9%
29.8%
2.2%
33.1%
1.5%
9.7%
31.6%
3.4%
27.2%
2.7%
(2.39)
0.10
5.81
(32.5)%
27.5%
(7.6)%
(27.6)%
(10.0)%
23,486
$
$
15,663
$ 114,366
$ 350,241
3.3 to 1
$ 685,739
7,931
$
9,760
$
$ 447,815
24,302
$
$
10,540
$ 120,603
$ 300,119
3.3 to 1
$ 593,455
29,937
$
35,057
$
$ 364,140
25,246
$
$
10,986
$ 138,857
$ 279,768
2.9 to 1
$ 607,783
46,917
$
47,983
$
$ 343,114
24,142
$
$
15,625
$ 146,896
$ 220,401
2.7 to 1
$ 548,330
52,148
$
60,872
$
$ 303,419
2.2%
2.1%
13,900
8,160
9.6%
8.8%
13,900
7,910
14.0%
12.3%
17,400
8,290
20.1%
16.7%
16,700
7,730
23.2%
18.9%
20,200
10,060
(14,719)
(7,168)
(7,551)
(6,000)
(13,551)
(277)
$ (13,828)
$
$
$
$
51,408
(0.15)
(0.27)
0.40
8.67
(1.6)%
27.0%
(1.2)%
48.7%
(0.5)%
25,323
$
$
27,386
$ 168,325
$ 263,245
2.6 to 1
$ 767,021
$
99,578
$ 104,370
$ 448,957
(1) Based on income (loss) from continuing operations
(2) Equal to total current assets divided by total current liabilities
(3) Equal to total debt divided by total equity
(4) Equal to total debt divided by total debt plus total equity
17
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information Fiscal 2012
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(13 weeks)
Fiscal Quarter Ended
7/30/2011
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $280,094
199,166
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
80,928
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77,455
Selling, general and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,473
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
424
Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
183
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
322
373
3,927
(41,929)
45,856
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling
(13 weeks)
10/29/2011
$307,679
211,896
95,783
83,535
12,248
389
166
(13 weeks)
1/28/2012
$316,515
216,724
99,791
82,771
17,020
274
138
(13 weeks)
4/28/2012
$327,388
224,033
103,355
86,465
16,890
297
124
—
(108)
11,917
4,245
7,672
1,415
(89)
18,210
2,864
15,346
16,300
(214)
32,803
12,769
20,034
interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(320)
Net income attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated . . . . $ 45,536
198
7,870
$
(388)
$ 14,958
(432)
$ 19,602
Diluted weighted average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income per share attributable to La-Z-Boy
52,443
52,475
52,379
52,609
Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
0.85
$
0.15
$
0.28
$
0.37
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information Fiscal 2011
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(13 weeks)
Fiscal Quarter Ended
7/24/2010
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $263,313
190,479
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
72,834
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
74,485
Selling, general and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-down of long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
(1,651)
Operating income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
590
Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
243
Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
(13 weeks)
10/23/2010
$292,982
207,876
85,106
79,767
—
5,339
592
223
Act, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to La-Z-Boy
—
351
(1,647)
(705)
(942)
726
—
(418)
4,552
1,381
3,171
774
(13 weeks)
1/22/2011
$291,943
203,597
88,346
78,354
—
9,992
561
250
903
251
10,835
2,451
8,384
1,626
(14 weeks)
4/30/2011
$338,905
230,847
108,058
91,358
4,471
12,229
603
228
151
221
12,226
5,466
6,760
3,548
Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
(216)
$
3,945
$ 10,010
$ 10,308
Diluted weighted average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income per share attributable to La-Z-Boy
51,785
52,214
52,270
52,359
Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
— $
0.07
$
0.19
$
0.19
18
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
We have prepared this Management’s Discussion and Analysis as an aid to better understand our financial
results . It should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and
related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We begin with an introduction to our key businesses and
significant operational events in fiscal 2012. We then provide discussions of our results of operations, liquidity
and capital resources, and critical accounting policies.
Introduction
Our Business
La-Z-Boy Incorporated manufactures, markets, imports, distributes and retails upholstery products, accessories
and casegoods (wood) furniture products. We are the leading global producer of reclining chairs, the second
largest manufacturer/distributor of residential furniture in the United States according to the May 2012 Top
sources for the U.S. Furniture Market in Furniture Today, and the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores retail
network is the second largest retailer of single-branded upholstered furniture in North America according to
the May 2012 Top 100 ranking by Furniture Today. We have nine major North-American manufacturing
locations to support our speed to market and customization strategy. We sell our products, primarily in the
United States and Canada, to furniture retailers and directly to consumers through company-owned stores. The
centerpiece of our retail distribution strategy is our network of 312 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores and
553 Comfort Studios(cid:5), each dedicated to marketing our La-Z-Boy branded products. We consider this
dedicated space to be ‘‘proprietary.’’ We own 85 of the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores. The remainder
of the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores, as well as all 553 Comfort Studios(cid:5), are independently owned
and operated. La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores help consumers furnish their homes by combining the
style, comfort and quality of La-Z-Boy furniture with our in-home design service. Comfort Studios(cid:5) are
defined spaces within larger independent retailers that are dedicated to displaying La-Z-Boy branded products.
In addition to the La-Z-Boy Comfort Studios(cid:5), our Kincaid, England and Lea operating units have their own
dedicated in-store gallery programs with over 700 outlets and 2.0 million square feet of proprietary floor
space. In total, our proprietary floor space includes approximately 9.3 million square feet.
Our reportable operating segments are the Upholstery segment, the Casegoods segment and the Retail segment.
•
•
•
Upholstery Segment.
In terms of revenue, our largest segment is the Upholstery segment, which
consists of three operating units, La-Z-Boy, our largest operating unit, as well as the Bauhaus and
England operating units. The Upholstery segment manufactures or imports upholstered furniture such
as recliners and motion furniture, sofas, loveseats, chairs, ottomans and sleeper sofas. The
Upholstery segment sells directly to La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores, operators of Comfort
Studios(cid:5), major dealers and other independent retailers.
Casegoods Segment. Our Casegoods segment is an importer, marketer, manufacturer and distributor
of casegoods (wood) furniture such as bedroom sets, dining room sets, entertainment centers and
accent pieces, as well as some coordinated upholstered furniture. The Casegoods segment consists of
two operating units, one consisting of American Drew, Lea and Hammary, and the second being
Kincaid. The Casegoods segment primarily sells to major dealers and other independent retailers.
Retail Segment. Our Retail segment consists of 85 company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5)
stores located in nine markets ranging from the Midwest to the east coast of the United States and
also including southeastern Florida and southern California. The Retail segment primarily sells
upholstered furniture, as well as some casegoods and other accessories, to end consumers through
the retail network.
Variable Interest Entities
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of certain entities (known as variable interest
entities or ‘‘VIEs’’) in which we held a controlling interest based on exposure to economic risks and potential
rewards (variable interests) for the periods in which we were the primary beneficiary. During the third quarter
of fiscal 2012, we deconsolidated our last VIE due to the expiration of the operating agreement that
previously caused us to be considered its primary beneficiary.
19
Significant Operational Events in Fiscal 2012
During fiscal 2012, we generated stronger sales volume in our Upholstery and Retail segments on one less
week as compared to last year. Our Retail segment improved its profitability for the third year in a row.
Ongoing cost reduction efforts produced the savings we expected, mostly driven by production efficiencies
gained at our Mexico cut and sew facility. We amended our revolving debt agreement and paid off all
amounts outstanding under that agreement by fiscal year end. We received $18.0 million in Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (‘‘CDSOA’’) proceeds. And finally, we deconsolidated our last VIE. These
items are all discussed in more detail throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
20
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year 2011
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Consolidated sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(52 weeks)
4/28/2012
$1,231,676
49,631
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$1,187,143
25,909
4.0%
2.2%
Percent
change
3.8%
91.6%
Sales
Fiscal 2012 includes results for a 52 week period, while fiscal 2011 includes results for a
53 week period.
Our consolidated sales increased by $44.5 million on one less week of shipments due to increased sales
volume in our Upholstery and Retail segments. We believe these improvements were the result of an effective
promotional plan which drove increased volume for our La-Z-Boy branded business, as well as the improved
performance of our network of retail stores, which includes our company-owned and independent-licensed
stores. The operating results of our Retail segment continued to improve, with increased sales levels resulting
from increased average ticket sales on customer traffic that was slightly down.
The improvement in our Upholstery and Retail segments were partially offset by the performance of our
Casegoods segment, which experienced decreased sales in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011. Overall
Casegoods order levels decreased during fiscal 2012, as our new product introductions during the year were
not as well-received as our new product introductions in the prior year.
Operating Margin
Our consolidated operating margin increased by 1.8 percentage points in fiscal 2012. Our Retail segment’s
operating margin continued to improve in fiscal 2012 as compared to the prior year and our Upholstery
segment’s operating margin also increased compared to the prior year. These improvements were partially
offset by our Casegoods segment, whose operating margin declined in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011.
•
•
•
Our gross margin increased 1.0 percentage point in the fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011.
Ongoing cost reductions, primarily in our Upholstery segment related to our Mexican operations,
along with improvements in our Retail segment’s gross margin, drove this improvement. Partially
offsetting these items were raw material price increases in our Upholstery and Casegoods segments.
Selling, General, and Administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses increased in dollars in fiscal 2012 as
compared to fiscal 2011, but as a percent of sales, SG&A decreased by 0.5 percentage points. The
improvement as a percentage of sales was driven by our increased sales volume and greater leverage
of SG&A expenses. The increase in dollars was driven by an increase in employee incentive and
compensation expense, primarily in the Upholstery segment and in Corporate and Other, as well as
increased advertising spend in the Upholstery segment.
Our fiscal 2011 operating margin was impacted by 0.4 percentage points for the write-down of long-
lived assets.
21
Upholstery Segment
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(52 weeks)
4/28/2012
$975,103
81,753
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$916,867
72,743
8.4%
7.9%
Percent
change
6.4%
12.4%
Sales
Fiscal 2012 includes results for a 52 week period, while fiscal 2011 includes results for a 53 week period.
Our Upholstery segment’s sales increased $58.2 million in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011 despite the
extra week in fiscal 2011. Increased volume drove the majority of the 6.4% increase in sales, which we
believe was the result of an effective promotional plan, combined with new product introductions and
accelerated sales in our stationary upholstery business, which drove increased volume for our La-Z-Boy
branded business, as well as the improved performance of our network of retail stores, which includes our
company-owned and independent-licensed stores.
Operating Margin
Our Upholstery segment’s operating margin increased by 0.5 percentage points in fiscal 2012 mainly due to
the following:
•
•
The segment’s gross margin increased 1.0 percentage point during fiscal 2012 due to a combination
of factors, the most significant of which were:
(cid:6) Ongoing cost reductions and efficiencies, including the favorable operating impact of our
Mexican operations, resulting in a 2.0 percentage point increase in gross margin.
(cid:6)
Raw material cost increases resulting in a 1.6 percentage point decrease in gross margin.
Offsetting the increase in gross margin were higher warranty costs of $1.0 million in fiscal 2012 as
compared to fiscal 2011, due to a reduction in the warranty reserve recorded in fiscal 2011 related to
the redesign of a mechanism that had historically experienced high claims activity. Also offsetting
the increase in gross margin was higher advertising spend and increased employee incentive and
compensation expenses in fiscal 2012.
Casegoods Segment
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(52 weeks)
4/28/2012
$139,639
5,540
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$152,534
6,698
4.0%
4.4%
Percent
change
(8.5)%
(17.3)%
Sales
Fiscal 2012 includes results for a 52 week period, while fiscal 2011 includes results for a 53 week period.
Our Casegoods segment’s sales decreased $12.9 million in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011. The decline
in sales volume was driven by our new product introductions in fiscal 2012 which were not as well-received
as our new product introductions in fiscal 2011.
22
Operating Margin
Our Casegoods segment’s operating margin decreased 0.4 percentage points in fiscal 2012 mainly due to the
de-leverage of fixed costs caused by the decline in sales volume.
Retail Segment
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(52 weeks)
4/28/2012
$215,490
(7,819)
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$176,987
(15,078)
(3.6)%
(8.5)%
Percent
change
21.8%
48.1%
Sales
Fiscal 2012 includes results for a 52 week period, while fiscal 2011 includes results for a 53 week period.
Our Retail segment’s sales increased $38.5 million in fiscal 2012 even though fiscal 2011 included an extra
week. Of this increase, $29.2 million was primarily due to the acquisition of our Southern California VIE in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. The remaining increase of $9.3 million related mainly to sales increases at
stores that were open in both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011. This increase was the result of increased average
ticket sales on customer traffic that was slightly down. We believe the increase in average ticket sales was the
result of an effective advertising campaign bringing in a more qualified consumer.
Operating Margin
Our Retail segment’s operating margin increased 4.9 percentage points in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.
While our Retail segment improved its operating margin for the third year in a row, the segment continued to
experience negative operating profit due to its high lease expense to sales volume ratio.
•
•
•
The segment’s gross margin during the fiscal 2012 increased 2.5 percentage points compared to
fiscal 2011.
The improved operating margin for this segment was primarily a result of the increased sales
volume which resulted in a greater leverage of SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales.
The stores acquired from our Southern California VIE were essentially break-even on an operating
margin basis for fiscal 2012, a substantial improvement over fiscal 2011 when these stores generated
an operating loss of $3.5 million when they were a consolidated VIE and not reported as part of the
Retail segment.
VIEs/Other
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales
(52 weeks)
4/28/2012
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
Percent
change
VIEs, net of intercompany sales eliminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eliminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
8,840
2,356
(109,752)
$ 29,105
1,909
(90,259)
Operating income (loss)
VIEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
959
(30,802)
(4,949)
(29,034)
(69.6)%
23.4%
(21.6)%
119.4%
(6.1)%
During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we deconsolidated our last VIE due to the expiration of the operating
agreement that previously caused us to be considered its primary beneficiary. Our VIEs’ sales decreased
$20.3 million (net of intercompany eliminations) in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011. This was mainly the
result of acquiring our Southern California VIE in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Prior to deconsolidation,
our remaining VIE had operating income of $1.0 million in fiscal 2012, compared to an operating loss of
$4.9 million in fiscal 2011 for the two VIEs we had at that time. Eliminations increased in fiscal 2012 as
compared to fiscal 2011 due to higher sales from our Upholstery and Casegoods segments to our Retail
segment as a result of the increased volume in the Retail segment.
23
Our Corporate and Other operating loss increased $1.8 million in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 due to
higher costs for incentive compensation expenses of $6.2 million as a result of improved operating
performance, partially offset by lower consulting costs of $1.8 million, a gain recognized on the
deconsolidation of our last VIE of $1.1 million and a $1.0 million reduction of an environmental reserve
recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 related to a previously sold division.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $1.0 million in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011, mainly due to a 2.1
percentage point decrease in our weighted average interest rate as a result of the May 2011 expiration of our
interest rate swap. Our average debt level decreased by $5.7 million in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.
Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (‘‘CDSOA’’) provides for distribution of duties
collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection from antidumping cases to domestic producers that
supported the antidumping petition. We received $18.0 million during fiscal 2012 and $1.1 million during
fiscal 2011 in CDSOA distributions related to the antidumping order on wooden bedroom furniture from
China. Certain domestic producers who did not support the antidumping petition (‘‘Non-Supporting
Producers’’) filed actions in the U.S. Court of International Trade challenging the CDSOA’s ‘‘support
requirement’’ and seeking a share of the distributions. As a result, Customs withheld a portion of those
distributions pending resolution of the Non-Supporting Producers’ actions. Between October 2011 and
February 2012, the Court of International Trade entered judgments against the Non-Supporting Producers and
dismissed their actions. On January 1, 2012, Customs announced that it would distribute the withheld
distributions. The Non-Supporting Producers then filed motions in the Court of International Trade and, later,
in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to enjoin such distributions pending their appeal of the
Court of International Trade’s judgments. On March 5, 2012, the Federal Circuit denied the Non-Supporting
Producers’ motions for injunction ‘‘without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of these cases.’’ If the Federal
Circuit were to reverse the judgments of the Court of International Trade and determine that the
Non-Supporting Producers are entitled to CDSOA distributions, it is possible that Customs may seek to have
us return all or a portion of our company’s share of the distributions. Based on what we know today, we do
not expect this will occur. Included in the $18.0 million received in fiscal 2012 are $16.3 million of
previously withheld distributions received in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. In view of the uncertainties
associated with this program, we are unable to predict the amounts, if any, we may receive in the future under
the CDSOA.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2012 was a net tax benefit of (33.0)%. During fiscal 2012, we reduced by
$46.2 million the valuation allowances associated with certain U.S. federal, state and foreign deferred tax
assets, in addition to recording other minor discrete items that together reduced our tax expense by an
additional $0.9 million. These adjustments increased diluted earnings per share by $0.88. The reduction in the
valuation allowance was the result of the following factors at the point we reduced the allowance, including
primarily (i) our cumulative pretax income position, (ii) our most recent operating results which had exceeded
both our operating plan and prior year results, and (iii) our then-current forecasts, all of which caused us to
temper our concerns at that time regarding the economic environment. Absent these adjustments, our effective
tax rate for fiscal 2012 would have been 37.5%.
The effective tax rate was 33.1% for fiscal 2011. Changes in the valuation reserve for deferred taxes due to
temporary timing differences increased our fiscal 2011 effective tax rate by 13.5 percentage points. Offsetting
this rate increase was a tax benefit associated with our southern California VIE that resulted in a rate
reduction of 17.6 percentage points. This tax benefit related primarily to the amount of accounts receivable
written off in excess of the fair value of the assets received from this VIE.
24
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year 2011 Compared to Fiscal Year 2010
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Consolidated sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$1,187,143
25,909
(52 weeks)
4/24/2010
$1,179,212
40,428
Percent
change
0.7%
(35.9)%
2.2%
3.4%
Sales
Consolidated sales increased $7.9 million compared to fiscal 2010. All of our segments experienced an
increase in sales during fiscal 2011, mainly due to the additional week in fiscal 2011. This was offset by the
deconsolidation of our Toronto, Ontario VIE, which resulted in a decrease of $20.4 million, net of
eliminations.
Operating Margin
Our consolidated operating margin decreased by 1.2 percentage points in fiscal 2011.
•
Our gross margin decreased by 1.8 percentage points in fiscal 2011 mainly due to the following:
(cid:6)
(cid:6)
Increases in raw material costs resulted in a 1.6 percentage point decrease in our consolidated
gross margin.
Cost reductions partially offset the raw material and product mix changes
•
Our fiscal 2011 operating margin included less than 0.1 percentage points of restructuring charges
and 0.4 percentage points for the write-down of long-lived assets, whereas our fiscal 2010 operating
margin included 0.3 percentage points of restructuring charges.
Upholstery Segment
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$916,867
72,743
(52 weeks)
4/24/2010
$904,871
95,732
7.9%
10.6%
Percent
change
1.3%
(24.0)%
Sales
Our Upholstery segment’s sales increased $12.0 million compared to fiscal 2010. This was a result of the
additional week in fiscal 2011.
Operating Margin
Our Upholstery segment’s operating margin decreased 2.7 percentage points in fiscal 2011 mainly due to the
following:
•
•
•
The segment’s gross margin decreased by 2.1 percentage points during fiscal 2011 due to increased
raw material costs.
Decreases in selling prices and changes in the product mix of this segment resulted in a
0.7 percentage point decrease in the segment’s operating margin.
Increases in our warehousing expense resulted in a 0.3 percentage point decrease in the segment’s
operating margin. This increase was the result of the addition of our new regional distribution center
opened at the end of fiscal 2010.
25
•
•
Increased advertising expense as a result of the focus on our brand platform resulted in a
0.3 percentage point decrease in the segment’s operating margin.
Somewhat offsetting the negative impacts to this segment’s operating margin were ongoing cost
reductions and a decrease in warranty expense due to the redesign of a mechanism that had
historically experienced high claims activity, which resulted in a 0.2 percentage point, improvement
in the segment’s operating margin.
Casegoods Segment
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$152,534
6,698
4.4%
(52 weeks)
4/24/2010
$146,706
(243)
(0.2)%
Percent
change
4.0%
N/M
N/M − not meaningful
Sales
Our Casegoods segment’s sales increased $5.8 million compared to fiscal 2010. In addition to the extra week
during fiscal 2011, the increase in sales was a result of broader placement of our various product lines at
independent dealers. Changes in discounting during fiscal 2011 also generated an improvement in sales for
this segment.
Operating Margin
Our Casegoods segment’s operating margin increased 4.6 percentage points in fiscal 2011 mainly due to the
following:
•
•
The segment’s gross margin increased 2.4 percentage points in fiscal 2011 mainly due to our
decision to vacate a leased warehouse and convert an owned facility to a warehouse, as well as
efficiencies realized in its manufacturing facility due to the changes completed at the end of fiscal
2010.
A decrease in employee expenses for this segment resulted in a 1.5 percentage point increase in
operating margin. The combining of our Hammary operations with our American Drew/Lea
operations resulted in a reduction in headcount and elimination of duplicate selling, general and
administrative functions.
Retail Segment
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$176,987
(15,078)
(52 weeks)
4/24/2010
$153,620
(19,825)
(8.5)%
(12.9)%
Percent
change
15.2%
23.9%
Sales
Our Retail segment’s sales increased $23.4 million in fiscal 2011. We believe the increase in sales was a result
of an effective promotional plan, which led to improved conversion on the customer traffic in our stores, as
well as the additional week in fiscal 2011. The segment’s sales were also positively impacted by the
acquisition of 15 stores from our previously consolidated California VIE, which increased sales by $9.4
million for our Retail segment.
26
Operating Margin
Our Retail segment’s operating margin increased 4.4 percentage points in fiscal 2011 mainly due to the
following:
•
•
The segment experienced a 1.0 percentage point improvement in gross profit margin during fiscal
2011 due to changes in the segment’s sales initiatives and merchandising.
The improved operating margin for this segment was primarily a result of the increased sales
volume. Additionally, this segment continued to focus on cost containment, which resulted in lower
selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales.
VIEs/Corporate and Other
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Sales
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
(52 weeks)
4/24/2010
Percent
change
VIEs, net of intercompany sales eliminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eliminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 29,105
1,909
(90,259)
$ 53,173
4,583
(83,741)
(45.3)%
(58.3)%
(7.8)%
Operating income (loss)
VIEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4,949)
(29,034)
(751)
(34,485)
N/M
15.8%
Our VIEs’ sales decreased $24.1 million in fiscal 2011, compared to fiscal 2010. This was mainly the result of
deconsolidating our Toronto, Ontario VIE, which reduced the number of stores for our VIEs by 8 during fiscal
2011. Also, our Retail segment’s acquisition in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 of 15 stores that had
previously been operated by our California VIE resulted in a $5.1 million, net of eliminations, decrease in our
VIEs sales during fiscal 2011. Our VIEs’ operating loss was $4.9 million in fiscal 2011, compared to an
operating loss of $0.8 million in fiscal 2010. The increased operating loss was mainly due to our Toronto,
Ontario VIE, which was a profitable VIE, no longer being consolidated in fiscal 2011. Eliminations increased
in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010 due to higher sales from our Upholstery and Casegoods segments to
our Retail segment as a result of the increased volume in the Retail segment.
Our Corporate and Other operating loss decreased by $5.5 million in fiscal 2011. The decrease in operating
loss was primarily a result of a decrease in restructuring costs of $2.9 million and a decrease in employee
incentive compensation expenses as a result of our lower operating performance and stock price in fiscal 2011
compared to fiscal 2010.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for fiscal 2011 was $0.6 million less than fiscal 2010 due to a $3.2 million decrease in our
average debt. Our weighted average interest rate decreased 0.2 percentage points in fiscal 2011 compared to
fiscal 2010. The deconsolidation of our Toronto, Ontario VIE also reduced our interest expense.
Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
We received $1.1 million and $4.4 million in payments and funds related to the anti-dumping order on
wooden bedroom furniture from China during fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively, for duties collected on
imports entered into the United States before October 1, 2007. The decrease in CDSOA funds we received
was a result of the smaller total amount available for distribution. The percentage of total distributions
allocated to our divisions that supported the petition was similar to prior years.
Income Taxes
Changes in the valuation reserve for deferred taxes due to current year temporary timing differences increased
our fiscal 2011 effective tax rate by 13.5 percentage points. Offsetting this rate increase was a tax benefit
associated with our southern California VIE that resulted in a rate reduction of 17.6 percentage points. This
tax benefit related primarily to the amount of accounts receivable written off in excess of the fair value of the
assets received from this VIE.
27
Long-lived Asset Write-down
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. We did not record any long-lived asset
write-downs during fiscal 2012. In fiscal 2011, the estimated undiscounted cash flows (based upon, among
other things, our annual forecasting process) related to certain locations were less than the carrying value of
the underlying assets. For those locations, we concluded that the estimated fair values approximated only the
levels of working capital due primarily to the continuing levels of historic operating losses. Consequently, we
concluded that the leasehold improvements at those locations were fully impaired and therefore recorded an
impairment charge of $1.8 million for several locations owned by our then-consolidated California VIE and
$1.3 million for various company owned stores in fiscal 2011. In addition, during fiscal 2011 we decided to
vacate one of our facilities and recorded an impairment charge of $1.3 million representing the full carrying
value of leasehold improvements at that location.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our sources of cash liquidity include cash and equivalents, cash from operations and amounts available under
our credit facility. We believe these sources remain adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity
requirements, finance our long-term growth plans, meet debt service, and fulfill other cash requirements for
day-to-day operations and capital expenditures. We had cash and equivalents of $152.4 million at April 28,
2012, compared to $115.3 million at April 30, 2011.
On October 19, 2011, we entered into an amended credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders, which
reduced our revolving credit facility capacity from $175 million to $150 million and extended its maturity
date to October 19, 2016. We may elect interest rates based on LIBOR or the base rate. The base rate is the
higher of the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate. Interest on LIBOR loans under the prior
agreement varied from LIBOR plus 1.75% to 2.25% based on average excess availability, but the amended
credit agreement lowered the rate to LIBOR plus 1.50% to 2.00%. Like the prior agreement, the amended
credit agreement provides for margins on base rate loans varying from 0% to 0.50%, but the amended credit
agreement lowers the excess availability required for the lower margins . The amended credit agreement
reduced the commitment fee that we pay on the unused portion of the revolving credit commitment from
0.375% to 0.25% per annum.
The amended credit agreement is secured primarily by all of our accounts receivable, inventory, and cash
deposit and securities accounts. The prior agreement was secured in addition by substantially all of our patents
and trademarks, including the La-Z-Boy brand name, but the amended credit agreement removed those assets
as collateral. Availability under the agreement fluctuates based on a borrowing base calculation consisting of
eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The agreement includes affirmative and negative covenants that
apply under certain circumstances, including a 1.05 to 1.00 fixed charge coverage ratio requirement that
applies when excess availability under the line is less than 12.5% of the revolving credit commitment. At
April 28, 2012, we were not subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement, but would have complied
with the requirement had we been subject to it. At April 28, 2012, we had no borrowings outstanding under
the agreement, and had excess availability of $124.2 million.
The amended credit agreement contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal when
due, nonpayment of interest after a stated grace period; inaccuracy of representations and warranties;
violations of covenants; certain acts of bankruptcy and liquidation; defaults under certain material contracts;
certain ERISA-related events; certain material environmental claims; and a change in control (as defined in the
agreement). In the event of a default, the lenders may terminate their commitments made, declare amounts
outstanding, including accrued interest and fees, payable immediately, and enforce any and all of their rights,
including exercising remedies with respect to the collateral including foreclosure and other remedies available
to secured creditors.
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2012 were $15.7 million compared with $10.5 million during fiscal 2011. We
have no material contractual commitments outstanding for future capital expenditures. We expect capital
expenditures to be in the range of $25.0 million to $30.0 million in fiscal 2013.
28
We believe our present cash and equivalents balance of $152.4 million, cash flows from operations and
current excess availability under our credit facility of $124.2 million will be sufficient to fund our business
needs, including our fiscal 2013 contractual obligations of $49.7 million as presented in our contractual
obligations table.
The following table illustrates the main components of our cash flows:
Cash Flows Provided By (Used For)
(Amounts in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash add backs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in deferred taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended
4/28/2012
4/30/2011
$ 88,908
32,320
(42,146)
3,766
82,848
$ 17,373
39,891
(120)
(29,298)
27,846
Investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(19,094)
(10,260)
Financing activities
Net decrease in debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash used for financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exchange rate effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in cash and equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(25,936)
(581)
(26,517)
(129)
$ 37,108
(11,033)
270
(10,763)
12
$ 6,835
Operating Activities
During fiscal 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $82.8 million, which included CDSOA funds
received during the year. We generated net income of $88.9 million during the year, partially offset by a
non-cash increase in deferred taxes of $42.1 million. Other non-cash add backs, primarily for depreciation and
amortization, totaled $32.3 million. Working capital increased $3.8 million and the major components of the
change are listed below:
•
•
•
•
•
Increase in other liabilities of $12.9 million, mainly due to higher accrued incentive compensation of
$6.2 million, income taxes of $3.8 million and freight of $1.5 million.
Increase in accounts payable of $7.5 million, offset by increased inventory levels of $7.4 million.
These increases were primarily due to increased raw material inventory in our Upholstery segment.
Increase in accounts receivable of $6.2 million, driven by the increase in sales.
Pension contributions of $5.8 million.
Decrease in other assets of $2.8 million.
During fiscal 2011, net cash provided by operating activities was $27.8 million. Our net income and
depreciation and amortization were $41.7 million and our change in working capital primarily consisted of
the following:
•
•
•
•
Decrease in accounts payable of $4.4 million.
Increase in inventory levels of $10.5 million due to our focus on being in a better service position
for our customers.
Decrease in other liabilities of $10.4 million due to payments of accrued benefits and decreases in
our estimated income tax liability.
$4.5 million for pension contributions.
Investing Activities
During fiscal 2012, net cash used for investing activities was $19.1 million, which consisted primarily of
$15.7 million in capital expenditures and a $2.9 million increase in restricted cash. Our restricted cash relates
to deposits serving as collateral for certain letters of credit. During fiscal 2011, net cash used for investing
activities was $10.3 million, which consisted primarily of $10.5 million in capital expenditures.
29
Financing Activities
We used $26.5 million of cash for financing activities in fiscal 2012, compared to $10.8 million during fiscal
2011. Our financing activities in fiscal 2012 included a net repayment of debt of $25.9 million compared to a
net repayment of debt of $11.0 million in fiscal 2011.
Our board of directors has authorized the purchase of company stock. As of April 28, 2012, 4.9 million shares
remained available for purchase pursuant to this authorization. We purchased 0.5 million shares during fiscal
2012. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, pursuant to the existing board authorization, we adopted a plan
to purchase company stock pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The plan was
effective April 30, 2012. Under this plan, our broker has the authority to purchase company shares on our
behalf, subject to SEC regulations and the price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan.
The plan expires at the close of business on August 31, 2012. With the cash flows we anticipate generating in
fiscal 2013 we expect to continue being opportunistic in purchasing company stock.
Other
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations of the types specified:
(Amounts in thousands)
Long-term debt obligations. . . . . . . .
Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease obligations. . . . . . . .
Interest obligations* . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension contribution obligations** . .
Total contractual obligations . . . . .
$
Total
9,115
645
318,456
207
4,790
$333,213
Less than
1 Year
$ 1,452
377
42,970
79
4,790
$49,668
Payments Due by Period
1−3 Years
$ 7,642
268
79,197
111
—
$87,218
4−5 Years
6
$
—
69,017
4
—
$69,027
More than
5 Years
$
15
—
127,272
13
—
$127,300
*
For our variable interest rate obligations, the interest rate projected for future periods is the average rate
for the current fiscal quarter projected over such future fiscal periods. For our fixed rate obligations, it is
the fixed rate over the term of such obligation. We have assumed that the debt outstanding at the end of
our current fiscal period will be outstanding over the entire term of the various agreements, however this
amount could significantly increase or decrease based on the amount of debt we borrow or pay in
future periods.
** For our pension contribution obligations, we are statutorily required to make a contribution at various
times during fiscal 2013. Funding projections beyond that are not practical to estimate.
Our consolidated balance sheet at the end of fiscal 2012 reflected a $1.7 million net liability for uncertain
income tax positions. It is reasonably possible that $0.3 million of this liability will be settled within the next
12 months. The remaining balance will be paid or released as tax audits are completed or settled.
Our debt-to-capitalization ratio was 2.1% at April 28, 2012, and 8.8% at April 30, 2011. Capitalization is
defined as total debt plus total equity.
At April 28, 2012, we had $68.6 million in open purchase orders with foreign casegoods, leather and fabric
suppliers. The majority of our open purchase orders that have not begun production are cancelable.
Continuing compliance with existing federal, state and local statutes dealing with protection of the
environment is not expected to have a significant effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings, competitive
position or liquidity.
Business Outlook
Given the strength of our brand, the breadth of our branded distribution network, plans for store growth and
the level of same-store-sales improvements over the past 18 months, La-Z-Boy Incorporated is positioned to
continue to improve its market share and will further capitalize on any strengthening in the economy,
particularly consumer confidence and the housing market. We have an efficient operating structure, a
successful brand platform, a strong dealer distribution network and a team that is committed to driving
growth, retail profitability and positive conversion on our additional volume.
30
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. In some cases, these principles require management to make difficult and subjective
judgments regarding uncertainties and, as a result, such estimates and assumptions may significantly impact
our financial results and disclosures. Estimates are based on currently known facts and circumstances, prior
experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable. We use our best judgment in valuing these
estimates and may, as warranted, use external advice. Actual results could differ from these estimates,
assumptions, and judgments and these differences could be significant. We make frequent comparisons
throughout the year of actual experience to our assumptions in order to mitigate the likelihood of significant
adjustments. Adjustments are recorded when the differences are known. The following critical accounting
policies affect our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances
Substantially all of our shipping agreements with third-party carriers transfer the risk of loss to our customers
upon shipment. Accordingly, our shipments using third-party carriers are generally recognized as revenue upon
shipment of the product. In all cases, for product shipped on our company-owned trucks, revenue is
recognized upon delivery. This revenue includes amounts billed to customers for shipping. Provisions are
made at the time revenue is recognized for estimated product returns and warranties, as well as other
incentives that may be offered to customers. We also recognize revenue for amounts received from our
customers in connection with our shared advertising cost arrangement. We import certain products from
foreign ports, which are shipped directly to our domestic customers. In this case, revenue is not recognized
until title is assumed by our customer, which is normally after the goods pass through U.S. Customs.
Incentives offered to customers include cash discounts and other sales incentive programs. Estimated cash
discounts and other sales incentives are recorded as a reduction of revenues when the revenue is recognized.
Trade accounts receivable arise from the sale of products on trade credit terms. On a quarterly basis, our
management team reviews all significant accounts as to their past due balances, as well as collectability of the
outstanding trade accounts receivable for possible write off. It is our policy to write off the accounts
receivable against the allowance account when we deem the receivable to be uncollectible. Additionally, for
those dealers that are significantly past due, we review their sales orders and ship product when collectability
of the incremental sale is reasonably assured.
We have notes receivable balances due to us from various customers. These notes receivable generally relate
to past due accounts receivable which were converted to a note receivable in order to secure further collateral
from the customer. The collateral from the customer is generally in the form of inventory or real estate.
Additionally, we have personal guarantees from some of these customers on these notes receivable.
In cases where we do not have sufficient collateral to support the carrying value of the note receivable, we
recognize an allowance for credit losses for this difference.
The allowance for credit losses reflects our best estimate of probable incurred losses inherent in the accounts
and notes receivable balances. We determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical
experience and other currently available evidence.
Investments
We evaluate our available for sale investments periodically for possible other-than-temporary impairments by
reviewing factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost basis, the
financial condition of the issuer and our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time which
may be sufficient for anticipated recovery of market value. If the impairment is determined to be
other-than-temporary, the amount of the impairment is recognized as part of earnings. If the impairment is
determined to be temporary, then the resulting change in market value is recorded as part of other
comprehensive income/(loss) in our consolidated statement of changes in equity.
Long-lived Assets
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Our assessment of recoverability is based
31
on our best estimates using either quoted market prices or an analysis of the undiscounted projected future
cash flows by asset groups in order to determine if the fair value of our long-lived assets exceed their carrying
value. Our asset groups consist of our operating units in our Upholstery and Casegoods segments (La-Z-Boy,
England, Bauhaus, American Drew, Lea and Hammary, Kincaid) and each of our retail stores.
Other Loss Reserves
We have various other loss exposures arising from the ordinary course of business, including inventory
obsolescence, health insurance, litigation, environmental claims, and self-insured workers’ compensation and
product liabilities. Establishing loss reserves requires estimates and the judgment of management with respect
to risk and ultimate liability. We use legal counsel or other experts, including actuaries as appropriate, to assist
in developing estimates. Due to the uncertainties and potential changes in facts and circumstances, additional
charges related to these reserves could be required in the future.
We have various excess loss coverages for auto, product liability and workers’ compensation liabilities. Our
deductibles generally do not exceed $1.0 million.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax
credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. In periods when deferred
tax assets are recorded, we are required to estimate whether recoverability is more likely than not, based on
forecasts of taxable earnings in the related tax jurisdiction. We consider historic and projected future operating
results, the eligible carry-forward period, tax law changes and other relevant considerations when making
judgments about realizing the value of our deferred tax assets.
Pensions
We maintain a defined benefit pension plan for eligible factory hourly employees at some operating units. The
plan does not allow new participants. Active participants at some operating units continue to earn service
credits. Annual net periodic expense and benefit liabilities under our defined benefit plan are determined on an
actuarial basis using various assumptions and estimates including discount rates, long-term rates of return,
estimated remaining years of service and estimated life expectancy. Each year, we compare the actual
experience to the more significant assumptions used, and if warranted, we make adjustments to the
assumptions.
Our pension plan discount rate assumption is evaluated annually. The discount rate is based upon a single rate
developed after matching a pool of high quality bond payments to the plan’s expected future benefit payments.
We utilized a discount rate of 4.6% at April 28, 2012, compared with a rate of 5.6% at April 30, 2011, and
5.9% at April 24, 2010. The same methodology was utilized for determining the discount rate in fiscal 2012,
fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010.
Pension benefits are funded through deposits with trustees and satisfy, at a minimum, the applicable funding
regulations.
Besides evaluating the discount rate used to determine our pension obligation, we also evaluate our
assumption relating to the expected return on plan assets annually. In selecting the expected long-term rate of
return on assets, we considered the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested
to provide the benefits of this plan. This included considering the trust’s asset allocation, investment strategy,
and the expected returns likely to be earned over the life of the plan. The rate of return assumption as of
April 28, 2012 was 7.8% compared with 8.0% at April 30, 2011. The expected rate of return assumption as of
April 28, 2012, will be used to determine pension expense for fiscal 2013.
Our long-term stated investment objective is to maximize the investment return with the least amount of risk
through a combination of capital appreciation and income. The strategic asset allocation targets are 65%
equities and 35% fixed income within a range of 5% of the target.
32
We are required to make $4.8 million in contributions to our qualified defined benefit plan in fiscal 2013. We
expect that the fiscal 2013 pension expense for the defined benefit pension plan, after considering all relevant
assumptions will be $2.7 million compared with $1.5 million in fiscal 2012. A 25 basis point change in our
discount rate or our expected return on plan assets would not have a material impact on our results
of operations.
Product Warranties
We account for product warranties by accruing an estimated liability at the time the revenue is recognized. We
estimate future warranty claims based on claim experience and any additional anticipated future costs on
previously sold product. Our liability estimates incorporate the cost of repairs including materials consumed,
labor and overhead amounts necessary to perform the repair and any costs associated with delivery of the
repaired product to the customer. Considerable judgment is used in making our estimates. Differences between
actual and estimated costs are recorded when the differences are known.
Stock-Based Compensation
We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and
recognized it as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant
date requires judgment, including estimating expected dividends, future stock-price volatility, expected option
lives and the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. We do not expect that changes
in these assumptions would have a material impact on our results of operations.
We record compensation cost for stock-based awards that vest based on performance conditions ratably over
the vesting periods when the vesting of such awards become probable. Determining the probability of award
vesting requires judgment, including assumptions about future operating performance.
The fair value of each option grant was estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected
volatility was estimated based on the historic volatility of our common shares. The average expected life was
based on the contractual term of the stock option and expected employee exercise and post-vesting
employment termination trends. The risk-free rate was based on U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the
expected life assumed at the date of grant. Forfeitures were estimated at the date of grant based on
historic experience.
The fair value of the performance award grant that vests based on a market condition was estimated using a
Monte Carlo valuation model. The Monte Carlo model was utilized to incorporate more complex variables
than closed-form models such as the Black-Scholes option valuation model used for option grants. The Monte
Carlo valuation model simulates a distribution of stock prices to yield an expected distribution of stock prices
over the remaining performance period. The stock-paths are simulated using volatilities calculated with
historical information using data from a look-back period that is equal to the vesting period. The model
assumes a zero-coupon, risk-free interest rate with a term equal to the vesting period. The simulations are
repeated many times (100,000 in this valuation) and the mean of the discounted values is calculated as the
grant date fair value for the award. The final payout of the award as calculated by the model is then
discounted back to the grant date using the risk-free interest rate.
Both the Monte Carlo and Black-Scholes methodologies are based, in part, upon inputs for which there is
little or no observable market data, requiring us to develop our own assumptions. Inherent in both of these
models are assumptions related to expected stock-price volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and
dividend yield.
Regulatory Developments
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued accounting guidance on the
presentation of comprehensive income which eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive
income and its components in the consolidated statement of changes in equity and requires the presentation of
net income and comprehensive income in one continuous statement, or in two consecutive statements. This
guidance will be effective for our fiscal year 2013 and will change the way we present comprehensive income
in our financial statements.
33
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Our exposure to interest rate risk results from
our variable rate debt, under which we had $8.1 million of borrowings at April 28, 2012. Management
estimates that a one percentage point change in interest rates would not have a material impact on our results
of operations for fiscal 2013 based upon our current and expected levels of exposed liabilities.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in the value of foreign currencies primarily related to our plant
in Mexico, as wages and other local expenses are paid in Mexican pesos. Nonetheless, gains and losses
resulting from market changes in the value of foreign currencies have not had and are not expected to have a
significant effect on our consolidated results of operations. A decrease in the value of foreign currencies in
relation to the U.S. dollar could impact the profitability of some of our vendors which could translate into
higher prices on our supplies, but we believe any impact would be similar for our competitors.
We are exposed to market risk with respect to commodity and fuel price fluctuations, principally related to
commodities used in the production of our products, including steel, wood and polyurethane. As commodity
prices increase, we adjust pricing to our customers to offset such increases. We do not believe that an increase
in these commodity costs would have a material impact on our results of operations.
34
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Management’s Report to our Shareholders
Management’s Responsibility for Financial Information
Management of La-Z-Boy Incorporated is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of
La-Z-Boy Incorporated’s consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Those consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing those consolidated
financial statements, Management was required to make certain estimates and judgments, which are based
upon currently available information and Management’s view of current conditions and circumstances.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which consists solely of independent directors, oversees our
process of reporting financial information and the audit of our consolidated financial statements. The Audit
Committee is informed of the financial condition of La-Z-Boy Incorporated and regularly reviews
Management’s critical accounting policies, the independence of our independent auditors, our internal controls
and the objectivity of our financial reporting. Both the independent auditors and the internal auditors have free
access to the Audit Committee and meet with the Audit Committee periodically, both with and without
Management present.
On September 9, 2011, La-Z-Boy Incorporated’s Chief Executive Officer submitted his annual certification to
the New York Stock Exchange stating that he was not aware of any violation by the corporation of the
Exchange’s corporate governance listing standards. La-Z-Boy Incorporated filed the certifications by its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 28, 2012.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting based upon the
framework in ‘‘Internal Control — Integrated Framework’’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of April 28, 2012. The effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 28, 2012, has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
which appears herein.
/s/ Kurt L. Darrow
Kurt L. Darrow
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Louis M. Riccio, Jr.
Louis M. Riccio, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
35
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of La-Z-Boy Incorporated:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of
income, of changes in equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
La-Z-Boy Incorporated and its subsidiaries at April 28, 2012 and April 30, 2011, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended April 28, 2012 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 28,
2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible
for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on the preceding page. Our responsibility is to express opinions
on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits
of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing
the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
June 19, 2012
36
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-down of long-lived assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense (benefit). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . .
Net income attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated. . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic net income per share attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated. . .
Diluted average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income per share attributable to
(52 weeks)
4/28/2012
$1,231,676
851,819
379,857
330,226
—
49,631
1,384
611
18,037
(38)
66,857
(22,051)
88,908
(942)
87,966
$
Fiscal Year Ended
(53 weeks)
4/30/2011
$1,187,143
832,799
354,344
323,964
4,471
25,909
2,346
944
1,054
405
25,966
8,593
17,373
6,674
24,047
$
(52 weeks)
4/24/2010
$1,179,212
806,086
373,126
332,698
—
40,428
2,972
724
4,436
480
43,096
11,737
31,359
1,342
32,701
$
$
51,944
1.66
52,478
$
51,849
0.46
52,279
$
51,533
0.63
51,732
La-Z-Boy Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1.64
$
0.45
$
0.62
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
37
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Amounts in thousands, except par value)
Current assets
Cash and equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receivables, net of allowance of $22,705 at 4/28/12 and $23,937 at 4/30/11. . . . .
Inventories, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes − current. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes − long term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contingencies and commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shareholders’ equity
Common shares, $1 par value − 150,000 authorized; 52,244 outstanding at
4/28/12 and 51,909 outstanding at 4/30/11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital in excess of par value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total La-Z-Boy Incorporated shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of
4/28/2012
4/30/2011
$152,370
2,861
167,232
143,787
19,081
14,669
500,000
114,366
3,028
33,649
34,696
$685,739
$
1,829
56,630
91,300
149,759
7,931
80,234
—
$115,262
—
161,299
138,444
—
17,218
432,223
120,603
3,100
2,883
34,646
$593,455
$ 5,120
49,537
77,447
132,104
29,937
67,274
—
52,244
231,332
189,609
(31,281)
441,904
5,911
447,815
$685,739
51,909
222,339
105,872
(18,804)
361,316
2,824
364,140
$593,455
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
38
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
4/28/2012
Fiscal Year Ended
4/30/2011
4/24/2010
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating
$ 88,908
$ 17,373
$ 31,359
activities
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on deconsolidation of VIE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-down of long-lived assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension plan contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from disposals of assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash effects upon deconsolidation of VIE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments on debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock issued for stock and employee benefit plans . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefit on stock option exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used for financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents. . . . . . . . . . .
45
(1,125)
—
(42,146)
4,196
23,486
5,718
(5,798)
(6,182)
(7,414)
2,799
7,470
12,891
82,848
372
(15,663)
(7,944)
8,649
(2,861)
(971)
(676)
(19,094)
—
(25,936)
(568)
4,943
223
(5,179)
(26,517)
(129)
201
—
4,471
(120)
7,197
24,302
3,720
(4,495)
1,599
(10,531)
(1,092)
(4,429)
(10,350)
27,846
506
(10,540)
(10,200)
10,655
—
(632)
(49)
(10,260)
30,585
(41,618)
—
270
—
—
(10,763)
12
(538)
—
—
(2,693)
6,535
25,246
5,236
—
(17,250)
7,074
3,225
13,147
18,318
89,659
3,338
(10,986)
(4,933)
8,833
17,507
—
250
14,009
41,817
(54,707)
—
1,035
—
—
(11,855)
(756)
Change in cash and equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37,108
115,262
$152,370
6,835
108,427
$115,262
91,057
17,370
$108,427
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
39
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
$205,945
Retained
Earnings
$ 65,027
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
$(23,168)
Non-
Controlling
Interests
$ 4,137
Total
$303,419
7,455
(7,455)
32,701
(1,342)
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
2,685
(97)
(190)
146
340
292
(556)
5,222
51,770
218,622
89,717
(20,284)
(Amounts in thousands)
Common
Shares
At April 25, 2009 (previously reported) . . . $51,478
Reclassification related to share purchase activity and
subsequent reissuances .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
Comprehensive income
Net income (loss) .
.
.
Unrealized gain on marketable securities arising during
.
the period.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
securities included in net income .
.
.
.
.
Translation adjustment .
.
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge .
.
Net pension amortization and net actuarial loss .
.
.
.
Reclassification adjustment for gain on marketable
.
.
.
.
.
Stock issued for stock and employee benefit plans,
.
.
.
Stock option, restricted stock and performance based
.
.
Total comprehensive income .
net of cancellations .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
stock expense .
.
Change in noncontrolling interest .
.
At April 24, 2010.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
Comprehensive income
Net income (loss) .
.
.
Unrealized gain on marketable securities arising during
.
the period.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Total comprehensive income .
securities included in net income .
.
.
.
.
Translation adjustment .
.
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge .
.
Net pension amortization and net actuarial loss .
.
.
.
Reclassification adjustment for gain on marketable
.
.
.
.
.
Stock issued for stock and employee benefit plans,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Stock option and restricted stock expense .
.
.
Acquisition of VIE and other .
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for
.
.
.
At April 30, 2011 .
noncontrolling interests .
net of cancellations .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
139
3,717
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
. . . . .
51,909
222,339
1,085
(495)
(298)
548
640
24,047
(244)
(8,573)
925
105,872
87,966
Comprehensive income
.
.
.
.
.
Net income .
Unrealized loss on marketable securities arising during
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
the period (net of tax of $0.0 million) .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
Reclassification adjustment for gain on marketable
securities included in net income (net of tax of
.
.
$0.2 million) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Translation adjustment .
.
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge .
.
Net pension amortization and net actuarial loss
.
.
(net of tax of $7.5 million) .
.
Total comprehensive income .
.
.
Stock issued for stock and employee benefit plans,
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
.
.
. . . . .
Purchases of common stock .
.
. . . . .
Stock option and restricted stock expense .
Tax benefit from exercise of options.
. . . . .
.
Change in noncontrolling interest upon deconsolidation of
VIE and other changes in noncontrolling interests . . . .
net of cancellations .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
835
(500)
4,011
(958)
5,717
223
(509)
(3,721)
1
At April 28, 2012.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . $52,244
$231,332
$189,609
$(31,281)
(18,804)
(2,777)
2,824
(1,852)
364,140
942
(167)
(7)
(324)
35
28
(12,209)
76,264
4,337
(5,179)
5,718
223
2,312
$ 5,911
2,312
$447,815
404
90
3,289
(6,674)
353
8,633
34,647
(264)
5,222
90
343,114
19,206
(105)
3,717
60
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of La-Z-Boy
Incorporated and its subsidiaries’ (individually and collectively, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘our’’ or the ‘‘Company’’) consolidated
financial statements. Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday of April. Our 2012 and 2010 fiscal years
included 52 weeks, while fiscal year 2011 included 53 weeks. The additional week in fiscal 2011 was included
in our fourth fiscal quarter.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of La-Z-Boy
Incorporated and our majority-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated,
including any related profit on inter-company sales. Additionally, our consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of certain entities in which we held a controlling interest based on exposure to economic risks
and potential rewards (variable interests) for the periods in which we were the primary beneficiary. As of
April 28, 2012, we no longer have any arrangements where we are the primary beneficiary.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we deconsolidated our last VIE due to the expiration of the operating
agreement that previously caused us to be considered its primary beneficiary. This entity was an independent
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) dealer operating nine stores. Sales and operating income, net of eliminations,
for this VIE were $8.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for fiscal 2012. Upon deconsolidation of this
VIE, we removed from our consolidated financial statements net liabilities of $2.7 million and increased
noncontrolling interest by $1.6 million, resulting in a $1.1 million non-cash operating gain in our consolidated
statement of income.
Use of Estimates
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts or disclosures of assets, liabilities (including contingent assets and liabilities) sales
and expenses at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued accounting guidance on the
presentation of comprehensive income which eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive
income and its components in the consolidated statement of changes in equity and requires the presentation of
net income and comprehensive income in one continuous statement, or in two consecutive statements. This
guidance will be effective for our fiscal year 2013 and will change the way we present comprehensive income
in our financial statements.
Cash and Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated balance sheet and statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid debt
instruments purchased with initial maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
We have cash on deposit with a bank as collateral for certain letters of credit.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out (‘‘LIFO’’)
basis for approximately 72% and 71% of our inventories at April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011, respectively.
Cost is determined for all other inventories on a first-in, first-out (‘‘FIFO’’) basis. The FIFO method of
accounting is mainly used for our Retail segment’s inventory and the smaller operating companies within our
Upholstery segment.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Items capitalized, including significant betterments to existing facilities, are recorded at cost. Capitalized
computer software costs include internal and external costs incurred during the software’s development stage.
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Accounting Policies − (continued)
Internal costs relate primarily to employee activities related to coding and testing the software under
development. Computer software costs are depreciated over three to ten years. All maintenance and repair
costs are expensed when incurred. Depreciation is computed principally using straight-line methods over the
estimated useful lives of the assets.
Disposal and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Retirement or dispositions of long-lived assets are recorded based on carrying value and proceeds received.
Any resulting gains or losses are recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. We
review the carrying value of our long-lived assets for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Trade Names
We test indefinite lived intangibles for impairment on an annual basis as of the end of our fiscal year, or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. In the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2012, we performed our annual testing on our trade names and recorded an impairment
charge of $0.1 million.
Investments
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with the net unrealized gains and losses (that are
deemed to be temporary) reported as a component of other comprehensive income/(loss). Realized gains and
losses and charges for other-than-temporary impairments are included in determining net income, with related
purchase costs based on the first-in, first-out method. For impairments that are other-than-temporary, an
impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the investment’s cost and its fair
value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment is made. The fair value of the
investment then becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment and it is not adjusted for subsequent
recoveries in fair value.
In May 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance on fair value measurements. This guidance requires the
categorization by level for items that are only required to be disclosed at fair value and information about
transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. In addition, it provides guidance on measuring the fair value of
financial instruments managed within a portfolio and the application of premiums and discounts on fair value
measurements. The guidance requires additional disclosure for Level 3 measurements regarding the sensitivity
of fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and any interrelationships between those inputs. We have
adopted this guidance during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
significant impact on our presentation or disclosure of fair value measurements.
Life Insurance
Life insurance policies are recorded at the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract as of the
date of our consolidated balance sheet. These assets are classified as other long-term assets on our
consolidated balance sheet. The change in cash surrender or contract value is recorded as income or expense
during each period.
Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances for Credit Losses
Substantially all of our shipping agreements with third-party carriers transfer the risk of loss to our customers
upon shipment. Accordingly, our shipments using third-party carriers are generally recognized as revenue upon
shipment of the product. In all cases, for product shipped on our company-owned trucks, revenue is
recognized upon delivery. This revenue includes amounts billed to customers for shipping. Provisions are
made at the time revenue is recognized for estimated product returns and warranties, as well as other
incentives that may be offered to customers. We also recognize revenue for amounts received from our
customers in connection with our shared advertising cost arrangement. We import certain products from
foreign ports, which are shipped directly to our domestic customers. In this case, revenue is not recognized
until title is assumed by our customer, which is normally after the goods pass through U.S. Customs.
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Accounting Policies − (continued)
Incentives offered to customers include cash discounts and other sales incentive programs. Estimated cash
discounts and other sales incentives are recorded as a reduction of revenues when the revenue is recognized.
Trade accounts receivable arise from the sale of products on trade credit terms. On a quarterly basis, our
management team reviews all significant accounts as to their past due balances, as well as collectability of the
outstanding trade accounts receivable for possible write off. It is our policy to write off the accounts
receivable against the allowance account when we deem the receivable to be uncollectible. Additionally, for
those dealers that are significantly past due, we review their sales orders and ship product when collectability
of the incremental sale is reasonably assured.
We have notes receivable balances due to us from various customers. These notes receivable generally relate
to past due accounts receivable which were converted to a note receivable in order to secure further collateral
from the customer. The collateral from the customer is generally in the form of inventory or real estate.
Additionally, we have personal guarantees from some of these customers on these notes receivable. In cases
where we do not have sufficient collateral to support the carrying value of the note receivable, our policy is to
recognize an allowance for credit losses for this difference.
These allowances for credit losses reflect our best estimate of probable losses inherent in the trade accounts
and notes receivable balances. We determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historic
experience and other currently available evidence.
Cost of Sales
Our cost of sales consists primarily of the cost to manufacture or purchase our merchandise, inspection costs,
internal transfer costs, in-bound freight costs, outbound shipping costs, as well as warehousing costs,
occupancy costs and depreciation expense related to our manufacturing facilities and equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses include the costs of selling our products and other general and administrative costs. Selling
expenses are primarily comprised of commissions, advertising, warranty, bad debt expense and compensation
and benefits of employees performing various sales functions. Additionally, the occupancy costs of our retail
facilities and the warehousing costs of our regional distribution centers are included as a component of
SG&A. Other general and administrative expenses included in SG&A are comprised primarily of
compensation and benefit costs for administration employees and other administrative costs.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are charged to expense in the periods incurred. Expenditures for research and
development costs were $7.7 million, $8.2 million and $7.9 million for the fiscal years ended April 28, 2012,
April 30, 2011, and April 24, 2010, respectively and are included as a component of SG&A.
Advertising Expenses
Production costs of commercials, programming and costs of other advertising, promotion and marketing
programs are charged to expense in the period incurred. A major portion of our advertising program is a
national advertising campaign. This campaign is a shared advertising program with our La-Z-Boy Furniture
Galleries(cid:5) stores, which are reimbursing us for about 35% of the cost of the program (excluding company
owned stores and our recently deconsolidated VIE). Because of this shared cost arrangement, the advertising
expense is reported as a component of SG&A and is partially offset by the reimbursement of the dealers’
portion of the cost, which is reported as a component of sales. Gross advertising expenses were $48.0 million,
$46.3 million and $44.9 million for the fiscal years ended April 28, 2012, April 30, 2011, and
April 24, 2010, respectively.
Operating Leases
We record rent expense related to operating leases on a straight-line basis for minimum lease payments
starting with the beginning of the lease term based on the date that we have the right to control the leased
property. Our minimum lease payments incorporate step rent provisions or rent escalations.
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Accounting Policies − (continued)
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax
credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
In periods when deferred tax assets are recorded, we are required to estimate whether recoverability is more
likely than not, based on forecasts of taxable earnings in the related tax jurisdiction. We consider historical
and projected future operating results, the eligible carry-forward period, tax law changes, tax planning
opportunities and other relevant considerations when making judgments about realizing the value of our
deferred tax assets.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of our Mexico subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Translation gains and losses associated
with translating our Mexico subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities, which are non-U.S. dollar denominated, are
recorded in other income/(expense) in our consolidated statement of income. The functional currency of each
of our other foreign subsidiaries is their respective local currency. Assets and liabilities of those subsidiaries
whose functional currency is their local currency are translated at the year-end exchange rates, and revenues
and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period. When the foreign subsidiary has
substantially ended operations, the remaining translation adjustments are recognized in other income/(expense)
in our consolidated statement of income.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We estimate the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using option-pricing models. The value
of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite
service periods in our consolidated statement of income using a straight-line single-option method. We record
compensation cost for stock-based awards that vest based on performance conditions ratably over the vesting
periods when the vesting of such awards become probable. We account for deferred stock units that will
ultimately be paid out in cash as liability-based awards. The liability for deferred stock units is initially
measured and recognized based on the market price of our common stock on the grant date. The liability is
re-measured and adjusted at the end of each reporting period until paid.
Reclassifications and Revisions
Certain prior year information has been reclassified to be comparable to the current year presentation. In
addition, our consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of changes in equity for fiscal 2012, 2011
and 2010 have been revised to include the cumulative effect of a reclassification at April 25, 2009, of
$7.5 million as of the beginning of fiscal 2010, $9.2 million as of the beginning of fiscal 2011 and $4.0
million as of the beginning of fiscal 2012 between capital in excess of par value and retained earnings related
to share purchase activity and subsequent reissuances.
Insurance/Self-Insurance
We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks, including workers’ compensation,
general liability, vehicle liability and the company-funded portion of employee-related health care benefits.
Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated in part by considering historic claims experience,
demographic factors, severity factors and other assumptions. Our workers’ compensation reserve is an
undiscounted liability. We have various excess loss coverages for auto, product liability and workers’
compensation liabilities. Our deductibles generally do not exceed $1.0 million.
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 2: Allowance for Credit Losses
As of April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011, we had notes receivable of $10.3 million from 12 customers
(including $2.7 million outstanding from our recently deconsolidated VIE) and $9.6 million from 16
customers, respectively, with a corresponding allowance for credit losses of $1.5 million and $2.1 million,
respectively. We have collateral from these customers in the form of inventory or real estate to support the net
carrying value of these notes. We do not accrue interest income on these notes receivable, but we record
interest income when it is received. Of the $10.3 million in notes receivable as of April 28, 2012, $1.9 million
is expected to be repaid in the next twelve months, and was categorized as receivables in our consolidated
balance sheet. As of April 30, 2011, $0.8 million of the $9.6 million in notes receivable were categorized as
receivables in our consolidated balance sheet. The remainder of the notes receivables were categorized as
other long-term assets, as was the allowance for credit losses.
The following is an analysis of the allowance for credit losses related to our notes receivable as of April 28,
2012, and April 30, 2011:
(Amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-offs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for credit losses, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Currency effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$ 2,067
(1,231)
38
749
(86)
$ 1,537
4/30/2011
$1,004
(483)
36
1,586
(76)
$2,067
Note 3: Inventories
(Amounts in thousands)
Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIFO inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess of FIFO over LIFO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$ 74,081
11,318
88,580
173,979
(30,192)
$143,787
4/30/2011
$ 70,326
11,461
84,367
166,154
(27,710)
$138,444
Note 4: Property, Plant and Equipment
(Amounts in thousands)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and building fixtures
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Information systems and software
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transportation equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . .
Estimated
Useful
Lives
3 − 40 years
3 − 20 years
3 − 10 years
—
3 − 30 years
3 − 10 years
3 − 20 years
4/28/2012
$ 168,451
141,476
56,621
15,158
10,772
17,595
12,335
7,249
429,657
(315,291)
$ 114,366
4/30/2011
$ 167,302
140,921
53,733
15,179
10,337
16,593
12,031
5,706
421,802
(301,199)
$ 120,603
Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended April 28, 2012, April 30, 2011, and April 24, 2010, was
$21.3 million, $22.0 million and $22.6 million, respectively.
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4: Property, Plant and Equipment − (continued)
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. We did not have any long-lived asset
impairments during fiscal 2012. During fiscal 2011, the estimated undiscounted cash flows (based upon,
among other things, our annual forecasting process) related to certain locations were less than the carrying
value of the underlying assets. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.8 million for several
locations owned by our then consolidated California VIE and $1.3 million for various company owned stores.
In addition, during fiscal 2011 we decided to vacate one of our facilities and recorded an impairment charge
of $1.3 million representing the full carrying value of leasehold improvements at that location. We did not
have any long-lived asset impairments during fiscal 2010.
Note 5: Investments
Included in other long-term assets in our consolidated balance sheet were available-for-sale investments of
$10.2 million and trading securities of $1.0 million at April 28, 2012 and available-for-sale investments of
$11.2 million and trading securities of $1.8 million at April 30, 2011. These investments fund future
obligations of our non-qualified defined benefit retirement plan and our executive qualified deferred
compensation plan. All unrealized gains or losses in the table below relate to available-for-sale investments
and were included in accumulated other comprehensive loss within our consolidated statement of changes in
equity because we did not have any unrealized gains or losses which were considered other-than-temporary
during fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011. If there were a decline in fair value of an investment below its costs and the
decline was considered other-than-temporary, the amount of decline below cost would be charged
against earnings.
The following is a summary of investments at April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011:
Fiscal 2012
(Amounts in thousands)
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal 2011
(Amounts in thousands)
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
$2,806
102
—
—
$2,908
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
$3,286
81
—
—
$3,367
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
$(83)
(7)
—
—
$(90)
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
$(10)
(9)
—
—
$(19)
The following table summarizes sales of available-for-sale securities (for the fiscal years ended):
(Amounts in thousands)
Proceeds from sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross realized gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross realized losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$5,622
573
(54)
4/30/2011
$7,448
592
(63)
Fair Value
$ 7,237
2,850
950
163
$11,200
Fair Value
$ 8,010
3,009
1,837
155
$13,011
4/24/2010
$6,811
285
(184)
The fair value of fixed income available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity was $1.2 million within
two to five years, $1.1 million within six to ten years and $0.6 million thereafter.
46
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 6: Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
(Amounts in thousands)
Payroll and other compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued product warranty, current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note 7: Debt
(Amounts in thousands)
Revolving credit facility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial revenue bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$36,638
8,230
12,204
34,228
$91,300
4/28/2012
$ —
7,131
1,984
645
9,760
(1,829)
$ 7,931
4/30/2011
$29,447
7,977
11,203
28,820
$77,447
4/30/2011
$20,000
11,482
3,104
471
35,057
(5,120)
$29,937
On October 19, 2011, we entered into an amended credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders, which
reduced our revolving credit facility capacity from $175 million to $150 million and extended its maturity
date to October 19, 2016. We may elect interest rates based on LIBOR or the base rate. The base rate is the
higher of the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate. Interest on our loans is set at the applicable rate
plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.00% for LIBOR loans and up to 0.50% for base rate loans, in each
case based on average excess availability. The amended credit agreement reduces the commitment fee that we
pay on the unused portion of the revolving credit commitment from 0.375% to 0.25% per annum.
The amended credit agreement is secured primarily by all of our accounts receivable, inventory, and cash
deposit and securities accounts. Availability under the agreement fluctuates in accordance with a borrowing
base calculation based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The agreement includes affirmative and
negative covenants that apply under certain circumstances, including a 1.05 to 1.00 fixed charge coverage
ratio requirement that applies when excess availability under the line is less than 12.5% of the revolving credit
commitment. At April 28, 2012, we were not subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement, but
would have complied with the requirement had we been subject to it. At April 28, 2012, we had no
borrowings outstanding under the agreement, and had excess availability of $124.2 million.
The amended credit agreement contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal when
due, nonpayment of interest after a stated grace period; inaccuracy of representations and warranties;
violations of covenants; certain acts of bankruptcy and liquidation; defaults under certain material contracts;
certain ERISA-related events; certain material environmental claims; and a change in control (as defined in the
agreement). In the event of a default, the lenders may terminate their commitments, declare amounts
outstanding, including accrued interest and fees, payable immediately, and enforce any and all of their rights,
including exercising remedies with respect to the collateral including foreclosure and other remedies available
to secured creditors.
Industrial revenue bonds were used to finance the construction of some of our manufacturing facilities. The
facilities constructed from the bond proceeds are mortgaged as collateral for the bonds. Interest for these
bonds is at a variable rate and at April 28, 2012, was approximately 0.4%. Maturities range from
June 2012 to June 2023.
Other debt includes foreign and domestic debt of $2.0 million. Maturities range from fiscal 2013 to fiscal
2015 with interest rates ranging from 4.9% to 6.4%.
Fair value of our debt approximates the carrying value.
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7: Debt − (continued)
Capital leases consist primarily of long-term commitments for the purchase of IT equipment and have
maturities ranging from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2015. Interest rates range from 7.6% to 9.1%.
Maturities of long-term debt, subsequent to April 28, 2012, are $1.8 million in fiscal 2013, $0.5 million in
fiscal 2014, $7.4 million in fiscal 2015, less than $0.1 million in fiscal 2016, less than $0.1 million in fiscal
2017 and less than $0.1 million thereafter.
Cash paid for interest during fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $1.6 million, $1.9 million and
$2.6 million, respectively.
Note 8: Operating Leases
We have operating leases for one manufacturing facility, executive and sales offices, warehouses, showrooms
and retail facilities, as well as for transportation, information technology and other equipment. The operating
leases expire at various dates through fiscal 2027. We have certain retail facilities which we sublease to
outside parties.
The future minimum rentals for all non-cancelable operating leases and future rental income from subleases
are as follows (for the fiscal years):
(Amounts in thousands)
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 and beyond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future
Minimum
Rentals
$ 42,970
40,111
39,086
35,680
33,337
127,272
$318,456
Future
Minimum
Income
$ 3,821
3,458
3,475
3,575
3,465
16,586
$34,380
Rental expense and rental income for operating leases were as follows (for the fiscal years ended):
(Amounts in thousands)
Rental expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rental income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$49,060
4,509
4/30/2011
$50,318
3,369
4/24/2010
$53,279
492
Note 9: Retirement and Welfare
Voluntary 401(k) retirement plans are offered to eligible employees within certain U.S. operating units. For
most operating units, we make matching contributions based on specific formulas. This portion of the plan
was suspended during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and re-instated during the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
We also maintain an Executive Qualified Deferred Compensation plan for eligible highly compensated
employees. An element of this plan allows contributions for eligible highly compensated employees. As of
April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011, we had $8.3 million and $8.4 million, respectively, of obligations for this
plan included in other long-term liabilities. We had life insurance contracts and mutual funds at April 28,
2012, and at April 30, 2011, with combined cash surrender and market values of $8.3 million and $8.4
million, respectively, included in other long-term assets related to this plan.
We maintain a non-qualified defined benefit retirement plan for certain former salaried employees. Included in
other long-term liabilities were plan obligations of $16.3 million and $15.0 million at April 28, 2012, and
April 30, 2011, respectively, which represented the unfunded projected benefit obligation of this plan. During
fiscal 2012, the interest cost recognized for this plan was $0.8 million, the actuarial loss recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive loss was $1.6 million and the benefit payments during the year were
$1.1 million. Benefit payments are expected to be approximately $1.1 million annually for the next ten years.
48
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9: Retirement and Welfare − (continued)
The discount rate used to determine the obligations under this plan was 4.3% for fiscal 2012. During fiscal
2011, the interest cost recognized for this plan was $0.8 million, the actuarial loss recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive loss was $0.6 million and the benefit payments during the year were $1.1 million. The
discount rate used to determine the obligations under this plan was 5.3% for fiscal 2011. This plan is not
funded and is excluded from the obligation charts and disclosures that follow. We hold available-for-sale
marketable securities to fund future obligations of this plan in a Rabbi trust (see Notes 5 and 18). We are not
required to make any contributions to the non-qualified defined benefit plan in fiscal year 2013; however, we
have the discretion to make contributions.
We also maintain a defined benefit pension plan for eligible factory hourly employees at some operating units.
Active participants at some operating units continue to earn service cost. The measurement dates for the
pension plan assets and benefit obligations were April 28, 2012, April 30, 2011, and April 24, 2010, in the
years presented.
The changes in plan assets and benefit obligations were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
as follows (pre-tax) (for the fiscal years ended):
(Amounts in thousands)
Beginning of year net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net current year actuarial loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
End of year net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$27,118
19,787
(1,635)
$45,270
4/30/2011
$28,320
571
(1,773)
$27,118
In fiscal 2013, we expect to amortize $3.0 million of unrecognized actuarial losses as a component of
pension expense.
The combined net periodic pension cost and retirement costs for retirement plans were as follows (for the
fiscal years ended):
(Amounts in thousands)
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net amortization and deferral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net periodic pension cost (hourly plan). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
401(k)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total retirement costs (excluding unfunded
4/28/2012
$ 1,110
5,565
(6,820)
1,635
1,490
2,476
107
4/30/2011
$ 1,187
5,531
(6,027)
1,773
2,464
2,578
342
4/24/2010
$ 1,043
5,600
(4,825)
2,109
3,927
831
340
salaried plan). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 4,073
$ 5,384
$ 5,098
*
Not determined by an actuary
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9: Retirement and Welfare − (continued)
The funded status of the defined benefit pension plan for eligible factory hourly employees was as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
4/30/2011
$101,602
1,110
5,565
15,314
(5,244)
118,347
86,100
2,659
5,798
(311)
(5,244)
$ 89,002
$ (29,345)
$ 95,967
1,187
5,531
3,935
(5,018)
101,602
77,232
9,742
4,495
(351)
(5,018)
$ 86,100
$ (15,502)
Amounts included in the consolidated balance sheet related to the defined benefit pension plan for eligible
factory hourly employees consist of:
(Amounts in thousands)
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$(29,345)
4/30/2011
$(15,202)
The actuarial assumptions for the defined benefit pension plan for eligible factory hourly employees were as
follows (for the fiscal years ended):
Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate used to determine net benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term rate of return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
4.6%
5.6%
7.8%
4/30/2011
5.6%
5.9%
8.0%
4/24/2010
5.9%
7.2%
8.0%
The discount rate is calculated by matching a pool of high quality bond payments to the plan’s expected
future benefit payments as determined by our actuary. The long-term rate of return was determined based on
the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide the benefits of these
plans. This included considering the trust’s asset allocation, investment strategy, and the expected returns
likely to be earned over the life of the plans. This is based on our goal of earning the highest rate of return
while maintaining acceptable levels of risk. We strive to have assets within the plan that are diversified so that
unexpected or adverse results from one asset class will not have a significant negative impact on the entire
portfolio. This basis is consistent with prior years.
The strategic asset allocation targets are 65% equities and 35% fixed income within a range of 5% of the
target. The weighted average asset allocations at year end for the defined benefit pension plan for eligible
factory hourly employees were as follows:
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
67%
31%
2%
100%
4/30/2011
65%
32%
3%
100%
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9: Retirement and Welfare − (continued)
The long-term stated investment objective of our defined benefit pension plan for eligible factory hourly
employees includes the following objectives:
•
•
•
maximize the investment return with the least amount of risk through a combination of capital
appreciation and income;
diversify the portfolio among various asset classes with the goal of reducing volatility of return and
reducing principal risk; and
maintain liquidity sufficient to meet our defined benefit pension plan obligations.
Although it is the intent to achieve a long-term above-average return, that intent does not include taking
extraordinary risks or engaging in investment practices not commonly considered prudent.
Risks of investing are managed through our asset allocation and diversification. We monitor and re-assess all
investments on a quarterly basis. In order to control risk through portfolio diversification, we have placed
portfolio market limits, which were discussed above as being within 5% of our target allocations. Investments
are reviewed at least quarterly and rebalanced as needed. The overall expected long-term rate of return is
determined by using long-term historical returns for equity and debt securities in proportion to their weight in
the investment portfolio.
The following table presents the fair value of the assets in our defined benefit pension plan for eligible factory
hourly employees at April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011.
Fiscal 2012
(Amounts in thousands)
Cash and equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Level 1
(a)
$ 1,736
44,725
—
$46,461
(a) There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during fiscal 2012.
Fiscal 2011
(Amounts in thousands)
Cash and equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Level 1
(b)
$ 2,913
41,984
—
$44,897
Level 2
(a)
$ —
15,071
27,470
$42,541
Level 2
(b)
$ —
13,695
27,508
$41,203
Level 3
$—
—
—
$—
Level 3
$—
—
—
$—
(b) There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2011 amounts have been
revised to reflect the reclassification of $14.8 million of debt funds from Level 1 to Level 2 and the
reclassification of $2.8 million of cash and other investments from Level 2 to Level 1.
Level 1 retirement plan assets include U.S. currency held by a designated trustee, cash and equivalents of
commingled funds generally valued using observable market data, and equity funds of common and preferred
securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. corporations. These equity funds are traded actively on exchanges and
price quotes for these shares are readily available.
Equity funds categorized as Level 2 include common trust funds which are composed of shares or units in
open ended funds with active issuances and redemptions. The value of these funds is determined based on the
net asset value of the funds, the underlying assets of which are publicly traded on exchanges. Price quotes for
the assets held by these funds are readily available. Debt funds categorized as Level 2 consist of corporate
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9: Retirement and Welfare − (continued)
fixed income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. corporations and fixed income securities issued directly
by the U.S. Treasury or by government-sponsored enterprises which are valued using a bid evaluation process
with bid data provided by independent pricing sources using observable market data.
Our funding policy is to contribute to our defined benefit pension plan amounts sufficient to meet the
minimum funding requirement as defined by employee benefit and tax laws, plus additional amounts which
we determine to be appropriate. During fiscal 2012 we contributed $5.8 million to our defined benefit pension
plan. We expect to contribute approximately $4.8 million to our defined benefit pension plan during
fiscal 2013.
The expected benefit payments by our defined benefit pension plan for eligible factory hourly employees for
each of the next five fiscal years and for periods thereafter are presented in the following table:
(Amounts in thousands)
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 to 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit
Payments
$ 5,126
5,202
5,310
5,433
5,622
31,184
$57,877
Note 10: Product Warranties
We accrue an estimated liability for product warranties at the time the revenue is recognized. We estimate
future warranty claims based on claim experience and any additional anticipated future costs on previously
sold products. Our liability estimates incorporate the cost of repairs including materials consumed, labor and
overhead amounts necessary to perform the repair and any costs associated with delivery of the repaired
product to the customer. Over 90% of our warranty liability relates to our Upholstery segment as we generally
warrant our products against defects for one year on fabric and leather, up to five years for padding and up to
a lifetime on certain mechanisms and frames. Considerable judgment is used in making our estimates.
Differences between actual and estimated costs are recorded when the differences are known.
A reconciliation of the changes in our product warranty liability is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Balance as of the beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruals during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrual adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance as of the end of the year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$ 13,854
15,074
—
(14,601)
$ 14,327
4/30/2011
$ 14,773
13,971
(1,031)
(13,859)
$ 13,854
During fiscal 2011, we reduced the levels of our estimated accruals for warranty by $1.0 million. This
reduction was the result of the redesign of a mechanism that had historically experienced high claims activity.
As of April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011, $8.2 million and $8.0 million, respectively, of our product warranty
liability was included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet, with
the remainder included in other long-term liabilities. The accruals recorded during the periods presented
primarily reflect charges related to warranties issued during the respective periods.
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 11: Contingencies and Commitments
We have been named as a defendant in various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business and as a
potentially responsible party at certain environmental clean-up sites. Based on a review of all currently known
facts and our experience with previous legal and environmental matters, we have recorded expense in respect
of probable and reasonably estimable losses arising from legal and environmental matters and currently do not
anticipate any significant additional loss for legal or environmental matters.
Note 12: Stock-Based Compensation
In fiscal 2011, our shareholders approved the La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan. This plan
provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units (including
deferred stock units), unrestricted stock, dividend equivalent rights, and short-term cash incentive awards.
Under this plan, the aggregate number of common shares that may be issued through awards of any form is
4.6 million shares. No grants may be issued under our previous plans.
Stock Options. The La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan authorizes grants to certain
employees and directors to purchase common shares at a specified price, which may not be less than 100% of
the current market price of the stock at the date of grant. Options granted to retirement eligible employees are
expensed immediately because they vest upon retirement. Granted options generally become exercisable at
25% per year, beginning one year from the date of grant for a term of four years. Granted options outstanding
under the former long-term equity award plan and employee incentive stock option plan remain in effect and
have a term of five or ten years.
Stock option expense recognized in selling, general and administrative expense for the years ended April 28,
2012, and April 30, 2011, was $1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. We received $4.9 million and
$0.3 million in cash during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively, for exercises of stock options.
Plan activity for stock options under the above plans is as follows:
Outstanding at April 25, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at April 24, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at April 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at April 28, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable at April 24, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable at April 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable at April 28, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)
2.5
Number of
Shares
(In Thousands)
2,431
1,360
(79)
(603)
(61)
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
$15.48
4.37
13.01
17.21
8.43
10.41
7.75
4.63
14.88
6.70
9.54
9.35
7.70
13.54
11.45
$ 9.33
$15.87
$12.85
$13.65
2.8
2.6
3.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
3,048
164
(58)
(522)
(56)
2,576
329
(734)
(415)
(1)
1,755
1,363
1,445
735
53
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$
105
$
371
$ 4,573
$12,744
$ 3,437
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 12: Stock-Based Compensation − (continued)
As of April 28, 2012, there was $1.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining vesting term of
all unvested awards of 1.5 years. During the year ended April 28, 2012, 0.6 million shares vested.
The fair value of each option grant was estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model, which requires management to make certain assumptions. Expected volatility was estimated based on
the historical volatility of our common shares. The average expected life was based on the contractual term of
the stock option and expected employee exercise and post-vesting employment termination trends. The
risk-free rate was based on U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life assumed at the date of
grant. The turnover rate was estimated at the date of grant based on historical experience. The fair value of
stock options granted during fiscal 2012, fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010 were calculated using the following
assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected life in years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock price volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Turnover rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
1.5%
0%
4/30/2011
0.75%
0%
5.5
88.8%
4.0%
3.0
86.6%
3.0%
4/24/2010
1.5%
0%
4.0
80.7%
3.0%
$6.68
$4.27
$2.59
Restricted Shares. Under the La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors is authorized to award restricted common shares to certain employees.
The shares are offered at no cost to the employees, and the plan requires that all shares be held in an escrow
account until the vesting period ends. In the event of an employee’s termination during the escrow period, the
shares are returned at no cost to the company. Compensation expense for restricted stock is equal to the
market value of our common shares on the date the award is approved and is recognized over the service
period. Expense relating to the restricted shares recorded in selling, general and administrative expense was
$1.6 million and $1.4 million during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. The unrecognized compensation
cost at April 28, 2012, was $2.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining
contractual term of all unvested awards of 2.5 years.
The following table summarizes information about non-vested share awards as of and for the year ended
April 28, 2012:
Non-vested shares at April 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-vested at April 28, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of
Shares
(In Thousands)
1,040
178
(204)
(41)
973
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
$6.41
9.35
8.14
6.46
$6.58
Performance Awards. Under the La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the previous
long-term equity award plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is authorized to award
common shares to certain employees based on the attainment of certain financial goals over a given
performance period. The shares are offered at no cost to the employees. In the event of an employee’s
termination during the vesting period, the potential right to earn shares under this program is generally
forfeited. The grant date fair value of performance-based awards is expensed over the service period. For
awards that vest based on performance conditions, the fair value of the award is the share price on the date of
grant, and compensation cost is expensed based on the probability that the performance goals will be obtained.
For awards that vest based on market conditions, the fair value of the award was estimated using a Monte
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 12: Stock-Based Compensation − (continued)
Carlo valuation model, and compensation cost is expensed over the vesting period, regardless of the ultimate
vesting of the award, similar to the expensing of a stock option award.
We granted 0.7 million performance awards during fiscal 2012 and 0.4 million performance awards during
fiscal 2011. The fiscal 2012 awards have both performance and market-based vesting provisions and the fiscal
2011 awards have only a performance condition. Based upon the terms of these awards, they can vest at
200% depending on the performance and market-based levels achieved. Our current estimate is that no
additional performance awards will vest in excess of those initially granted. As such, during fiscal 2012, we
recorded $1.4 million ($0.8 million of which related to marked based amortization) for the fiscal 2012 grant
with a service period ending April 26, 2014 and $0.2 million for the fiscal 2011 grant with a service period
ending April 27, 2013 in fiscal 2012 due to the probability that certain goals would be obtained. There was no
expense recognized for performance shares during fiscal 2011.
Restricted Stock Units. Under the La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors is authorized to award restricted stock units to our non-employee
directors. These units are offered at no cost to the directors and the awards vest upon the director leaving the
board. These awards will be paid in shares of our common stock upon exercise and, consequently, we account
for them as equity based awards. Compensation expense for these awards is measured and recognized based
on the market price of our common shares at the date the grant was approved. During fiscal 2012 and fiscal
2011 we granted 0.1 million restricted stock units each year to our non-employee directors. Expense relating
to the restricted stock units recorded in selling, general and administrative expense was $0.6 million in fiscal
2012 and $0.7 million during fiscal 2011.
Previously Granted Deferred Stock Units. Awards under our deferred stock unit plan for non-employee
directors are accounted for as liability-based awards because upon exercise these awards will be paid in cash.
Compensation expense is initially measured and recognized based on the market price of our common stock
on the grant date. The liability is re-measured and adjusted at the end of each reporting period until paid. For
purposes of dividends and for measuring the liability, each deferred stock unit is the equivalent of one
common share. As of April 28, 2012, we had 0.1 million deferred stock units outstanding. Expense/(benefit)
relating to the deferred stock units recorded in selling, general and administrative expense was $0.4 million
and $(0.5) million during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. We settled shares in the amount of
$0.1 million during the year. The liability related to these awards was $1.9 million and $1.6 million at
April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011, respectively, and is included as a component of other long-term liabilities
on our consolidated balance sheet.
Note 13: Total Comprehensive Income
The components of total comprehensive income are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income:
Currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities arising
during the period, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net pension amortization and net actuarial loss, net of tax . . . .
Total other comprehensive income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total comprehensive income before allocation to noncontrolling
4/28/2012
$ 88,908
4/30/2011
$17,373
4/24/2010
$31,359
(132)
28
(331)
(12,209)
(12,644)
55
548
590
640
1,833
214
146
2,588
340
3,288
interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
76,264
19,206
34,647
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling
interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated . . .
(775)
$ 75,489
6,321
$25,527
938
$35,585
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 13: Total Comprehensive Income − (continued)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flow hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gains on marketable securities, including tax effects . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net actuarial loss, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$ 4,029
—
3,017
(38,327)
$(31,281)
4/30/2011
$ 3,994
(28)
3,348
(26,118)
$(18,804)
Note 14: Segment Information
Our reportable operating segments are the Upholstery segment, the Casegoods segment and the
Retail segment.
Upholstery Segment. The Upholstery segment consists of three operating units, La-Z-Boy, England and
Bauhaus. This segment manufactures or imports upholstered furniture. Upholstered furniture includes recliners
and motion furniture, sofas, loveseats, chairs, ottomans and sleeper sofas. The Upholstery segment sells
directly to La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores, operators of Comfort Studios, major dealers and other
independent retailers.
Casegoods Segment. The Casegoods segment consists of two operating units, one consisting of American
Drew, Lea and Hammary, and the second being Kincaid. This segment sells imported or manufactured wood
furniture to furniture retailers. Casegoods product includes bedroom, dining room, entertainment centers,
accent pieces and some coordinated upholstered furniture. The Casegoods segment sells to major dealers and
other independent retailers.
Retail Segment. The Retail segment consists of 85 company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) stores in
nine primary markets. The Retail segment sells upholstered furniture, as well as some casegoods and other
accessories, to end consumers through the retail network.
We have no customer that individually represents more than 3% of our consolidated or Upholstery segment’s
sales or more than 6% of our Casegoods segment’s sales in fiscal 2012.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in Note 1. Segment
operating income is based on profit or loss from operations before interest expense, other income (expense)
and income taxes. Identifiable assets are cash and equivalents, notes and accounts receivable, net inventories,
net property, plant and equipment, and trade names. Our unallocated assets include deferred income taxes,
corporate assets (including a portion of cash and equivalents), and various other assets. Sales are attributed to
countries on the basis of the customer’s location.
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14: Segment Information − (continued)
(Amounts in thousands)
Sales
4/28/2012
4/30/2011
4/24/2010
Upholstery Segment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Casegoods Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIEs, net of intercompany sales eliminations . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eliminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 975,103
139,639
215,490
8,840
2,356
(109,752)
$1,231,676
$ 916,867
152,534
176,987
29,105
1,909
(90,259)
$1,187,143
$ 904,871
146,706
153,620
53,173
4,583
(83,741)
$1,179,212
Operating Income (Loss)
Upholstery Segment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Casegoods Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-down of long-lived assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Operating Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and Amortization
Upholstery Segment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Casegoods Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Depreciation and Amortization . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital Expenditures
Upholstery Segment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Casegoods Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Capital Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
$
81,753
5,540
(7,819)
959
(30,802)
—
49,631
12,696
1,575
2,832
149
6,234
23,486
7,406
897
1,848
543
4,969
15,663
$
$
$
$
$
$
72,743
6,698
(15,078)
(4,949)
(29,034)
(4,471)
25,909
13,260
1,655
3,174
942
5,271
24,302
5,510
689
141
395
3,805
10,540
$
$
$
$
$
$
95,732
(243)
(19,825)
(751)
(34,485)
—
40,428
13,817
1,770
3,308
2,078
4,273
25,246
7,088
1,468
106
692
1,632
10,986
Assets
Upholstery Segment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Casegoods Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unallocated Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 303,537
73,888
49,818
—
258,496
$ 685,739
$ 305,363
76,724
46,773
5,022
159,573
$ 593,455
$ 344,776
73,393
50,984
26,961
111,669
$ 607,783
Long-Lived Assets by Geographic Location
Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Long-Lived Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 114,979
8,345
$ 123,324
$ 119,445
10,418
$ 129,863
$ 135,066
15,529
$ 150,595
Sales by Country
United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
87%
8%
5%
100%
87%
9%
4%
100%
88%
9%
3%
100%
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 15: Income Taxes
We evaluate our deferred taxes to determine if a valuation allowance is required. Accounting standards require
that we assess whether a valuation allowance should be established based on the consideration of all available
evidence using a ‘‘more likely than not’’ standard with significant weight being given to evidence that can be
objectively verified.
During fiscal 2012 we concluded that certain valuation allowances totaling $46.2 million associated with
certain U.S. federal, state and Canadian deferred tax assets should be reversed because we believed that it had
become more likely than not that the value of those deferred tax assets would be realized. The reduction in
the valuation allowance was the result of the following factors at the point we reduced the allowance,
including primarily (i) our cumulative pretax income position, (ii) our most recent operating results which had
exceeded both our operating plan and prior year results, and (iii) our then-current forecasts, all of which
caused us to temper our concerns at that time regarding the economic environment.
In connection with our analysis of the total amounts of the valuation allowance to be reversed, we conducted
an updated analysis of our deferred tax asset position as of April 30, 2011. As a result of this analysis, we
determined that our total gross U.S. deferred tax assets at April 30, 2011, should be reduced by $8.7 million,
with a corresponding decrease to the related valuation allowance. The adjustments to reduce our gross
deferred tax balances were primarily related to unrealized gains on our investments, employee benefit plan
arrangements and state income taxes. A summary of the valuation allowance by jurisdiction is as follows:
Jurisdiction
(Amounts in thousands)
U.S. federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. state. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/30/2011
Valuation
Allowance
$41,881
12,597
2,544
$57,022
Change
$(39,767)
(3,754)
(2,521)
$(46,042)
4/28/2012
Valuation
Allowance
$ 2,114
8,843
23
$10,980
The remaining valuation allowance of $11.0 million primarily related to certain U.S. federal and state deferred
tax assets. The U.S. federal deferred tax assets represent capital losses that we believe are more likely than not
to expire before being utilized. The state deferred taxes are primarily related to state net operating losses.
The deferred tax assets associated with loss carry forwards and the related expiration dates are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
U.S. federal capital loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Various U.S. state net operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign net operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign capital losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amount
$2,114
9,093
914
23
Expiration
Fiscal 2013
Fiscal 2013 − 2032
Fiscal 2029
Indefinite
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 15: Income Taxes − (continued)
The primary components of our deferred tax assets and (liabilities) were as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Assets
Deferred and other compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income tax − net operating losses, credits and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Workers’ compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign net operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital loss carryover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred tax liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
4/30/2011
$ 15,728
9,983
9,093
11,731
5,684
3,821
3,644
914
3,202
5,276
(10,980)
58,096
(5,366)
—
(5,366)
$ 52,730
$ 15,172
10,137
10,444
4,803
5,211
3,595
3,295
2,462
1,943
7,801
(57,022)
7,841
(1,705)
(3,253)
(4,958)
$ 2,883
Our effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal income tax rate for the following reasons:
(% of pre-tax income)
Statutory tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. manufacturing benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in value of life insurance contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit associated with VIE acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miscellaneous items. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
35.0%
4/30/2011
35.0%
4/24/2010
35.0%
5.0
(2.3)
(69.1)
—
—
(1.6)
(33.0)%
4.1
(1.9)
13.5
(0.6)
(17.6)
0.6
33.1%
1.9
(1.7)
(5.3)
(1.5)
—
(1.2)
27.2%
For our Asian operating units, we continue to permanently reinvest the earnings and consequently do not
record a deferred tax liability relative to the undistributed earnings. We have reinvested approximately
$6.3 million of the earnings. The potential deferred tax attributable to these earnings is not currently
estimable.
Income tax expense applicable to continuing operations consists of the following components (for the fiscal
years ended):
(Amounts in thousands)
Federal
State
− current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
− deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
− current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
− deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
− current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
− deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign
4/28/2012
$ 14,392
(38,396)
3,663
(1,843)
2,040
(1,907)
$(22,051)
4/30/2011
$5,935
—
930
700
1,848
(820)
$8,593
4/24/2010
$11,059
—
920
(2,253)
2,451
(440)
$11,737
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 15: Income Taxes − (continued)
Income before income taxes consists of the following (for the fiscal years ended):
(Amounts in thousands)
United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$60,538
6,319
$66,857
4/30/2011
$21,331
4,635
$25,966
4/24/2010
$36,233
6,863
$43,096
As of April 28, 2012, we had a gross unrecognized tax benefit of $3.9 million related to uncertain tax
positions in various jurisdictions. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of these unrecognized
tax benefits is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/28/2012
$4,492
4/30/2011
$4,805
4/24/2010
$6,019
Additions:
Positions taken during the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positions taken during the prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions:
Positions taken during the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positions taken during the prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions resulting from the lapse of the statute of limitations. . . . . .
147
—
—
(202)
(166)
(362)
100
229
—
(359)
(202)
(81)
211
81
—
(899)
(54)
(553)
Balance at the end of the period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3,909
$4,492
$4,805
We recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Accrued
interest and penalties decreased by $0.1 million during fiscal 2012. We had approximately $0.6 million
accrued for interest and penalties as of April 28, 2012, and $0.7 million accrued for interest and penalties as
of April 30, 2011.
If recognized, $2.2 million of the total $3.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits would decrease our effective
tax rate. It is reasonably possible that $0.3 million of this liability will be settled within the next 12 months.
The remaining balance will be settled or released as tax audits are effectively settled or statutes of
limitation expire.
Our U.S. federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2006 and subsequent are still subject to audit. In addition,
we conduct business in various states. The major states in which we conduct business are subject to audit for
fiscal years 2008 and subsequent.
Cash paid for taxes (net of refunds received) during the fiscal years ended April 28, 2012, April 30, 2011, and
April 24, 2010, were $15.2 million, $9.1 million and $(0.2) million, respectively.
Note 16: Variable Interest Entities
Our financial statements include the accounts of certain entities in which we held a controlling interest based
on exposure to economic risks and potential rewards (variable interests) for the periods in which we were the
primary beneficiary. Accounting guidance requires that a variable interest entity (‘‘VIE’’) be consolidated if
the company has both (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the
entity’s economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the
VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we deconsolidated
our last VIE due to the expiration of the operating agreement that previously caused us to be considered its
primary beneficiary.
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 16: Variable Interest Entities − (continued)
The table below shows the amount of assets and liabilities from our one VIE included in our consolidated
balance sheet as of April 30, 2011:
(Amounts in thousands)
Cash and equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receivables, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/30/2011
$1,642
20
2,719
79
374
188
$5,022
$ 278
2,198
339
$2,815
We have significant interests in three independent La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries(cid:5) dealers for which we are not
the primary beneficiary. Our total exposure related to these dealers at April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011, was
$2.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively, consisting primarily of past due accounts receivable as well as
notes receivable, net of reserves and collateral on inventory and real estate. We have not provided additional
financial or other support to these dealers during fiscal 2012 and have no obligations or commitments to
provide further support.
Note 17: Earnings per Share
Certain share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends prior to
vesting are considered participating securities. We grant restricted stock awards that contain non-forfeitable
rights to dividends on unvested shares; as participating securities, the unvested shares are required to be
included in the calculation of our basic earnings per common share, using the two-class method.
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings
per share were as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated . . . . . . . . .
Income allocated to participating securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income available to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . .
(Amounts in thousands)
Denominator:
4/28/2012
$87,966
(1,650)
$86,316
Year Ended
4/30/2011
$24,047
(472)
$23,575
4/24/2010
$32,701
(619)
$32,082
4/28/2012
Year Ended
4/30/2011
4/24/2010
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . .
Add:
51,944
51,849
51,533
Stock option dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . .
534
52,478
430
52,279
199
51,732
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 17: Earnings per Share − (continued)
We had outstanding options to purchase 0.4 million, 1.2 million and 1.7 million shares for the years ended
April 28, 2012, April 30, 2011, and April 24, 2010, respectively, with a weighted average exercise price of
$19.97, $15.21, and $15.08, respectively. We excluded the effect of these options from the diluted share
calculation since, for each period presented, the weighted average exercise price of the options was higher
than the average market price, and including the options’ effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 18: Fair Value Measurements
Accounting standards require the categorization of financial assets and liabilities, based on the inputs to the
valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The various levels of the fair value hierarchy are
described as follows:
•
•
•
Level 1 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted market
prices for identical assets and liabilities in an active market that we have the ability to access.
Level 2 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that
are not active or model inputs that are observable for substantially the full term of the asset
or liability.
Level 3 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques
that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
Accounting standards require the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value
measurements. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level
within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to
the fair value measurement. Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period in
which they occur.
In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, we are required to
record assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Non-financial assets such as trade names
and long-lived assets are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair
value only when an impairment loss is recognized. During fiscal 2012 we recorded trade names at fair value.
We recorded various long-lived assets during fiscal 2011 at fair value, as well as one asset currently held for
sale. See Note 4 for additional information regarding the impairments recorded on our long-lived assets.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011:
Fiscal 2012
(Amounts in thousands)
Assets
Level 1(a)
Fair Value Measurements
Level 2(a)
Level 3
Available-for-sale securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,886
—
$2,886
$7,364
950
$8,314
$—
—
$—
(a) There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during fiscal 2012.
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 18: Fair Value Measurements − (continued)
Fiscal 2011
(Amounts in thousands)
Assets
Fair Value Measurements
Level 2(b)
Level 1(b)
Level 3
Available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3,174
—
$8,000
1,837
Liabilities
Interest rate swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
$3,174
(28)
$9,809
$—
—
—
$—
(b) There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2011 amounts have been
revised to reflect the reclassification of $5.5 million of debt funds from Level 1 to Level 2.
We hold available-for-sale marketable securities to fund future obligations of our non-qualified defined benefit
retirement plan and trading securities to fund future obligations of our executive qualified compensation plan.
The fair value measurements for our securities are based upon quoted prices in active markets, as well as
through broker quotes and independent valuation providers, multiplied by the number of shares owned
exclusive of any transaction costs.
In order to fix a portion of our floating rate debt, we entered into a three year interest rate swap agreement
which expired during the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
Note 19: Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (‘‘CDSOA’’) provides for distribution of duties
collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection from antidumping cases to domestic producers that
supported the antidumping petition. We received $18.0 million during fiscal 2012, $1.1 million during fiscal
2011, and $4.4 million during fiscal 2010 in CDSOA distributions related to the antidumping order on wooden
bedroom furniture from China. Certain domestic producers who did not support the antidumping petition
(‘‘Non-Supporting Producers’’) filed actions in the U.S. Court of International Trade challenging the CDSOA’s
‘‘support requirement’’ and seeking a share of the distributions. As a result, Customs withheld a portion of
those distributions pending resolution of the Non-Supporting Producers’ actions. Between October 2011 and
February 2012, the Court of International Trade entered judgments against the Non-Supporting Producers and
dismissed their actions. On January 1, 2012, Customs announced that it would distribute the withheld
distributions. The Non-Supporting Producers then filed motions in the Court of International Trade and, later,
in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to enjoin such distributions pending their appeal of the
Court of International Trade’s judgments. On March 5, 2012, the Federal Circuit denied the Non-Supporting
Producers’ motions for injunction ‘‘without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of these cases.’’ If the Federal
Circuit were to reverse the judgments of the Court of International Trade and determine that the
Non-Supporting Producers are entitled to CDSOA distributions, it is possible that Customs may seek to have
us return all or a portion of our company’s share of the distributions. Based on what we know today, we do
not expect this will occur. Included in the $18.0 million received in fiscal 2012 are $16.3 million of
previously withheld distributions received in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.
63
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that such disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management’s report on
internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8 of this report.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm. Our registered public accounting firm’s
attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8 of this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
64
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct, which applies to all of our officers, directors, and employees.
A current copy of the code is posted at our website ‘‘http://www.la-z-boy.com’’.
We provide some information about our executive officers in Part I of this report, under the heading
‘‘Executive Officers of Registrant.’’ All other information required to be reported under this item will be
included in our proxy statement for our 2012 annual meeting, and all of that information is incorporated in
this item by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
All information required to be reported under this item will be included in our proxy statement for our 2012
annual meeting, and all of that information is incorporated in this item by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The information required to be reported under Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is contained in Item 5 of this
report. All other information required to be reported under this item will be included in our proxy statement
for our 2012 annual meeting, and all of that information is incorporated in this item by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.
All information required to be reported under this item will be included in our proxy statement for our 2012
annual meeting, and all of that information is incorporated in this item by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
All information required to be reported under this item will be included in our proxy statement for our 2012
annual meeting, and all of that information is incorporated in this item by reference.
65
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1)
Financial Statements:
Management’s Report to Our Shareholders
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statement of Income for each of the three fiscal years ended April 28, 2012,
April 30, 2011 and April 24, 2010
Consolidated Balance Sheet at April 28, 2012, and April 30, 2011
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended April 28, 2012, April 30,
2011, and April 24, 2010
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended
April 28, 2012, April 30, 2011, and April 24, 2010
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statement Schedules:
(2)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three fiscal years in the
period ended April 28, 2012
The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Schedule II immediately
following this item.
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required because the
required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Note: For all exhibits incorporated by reference, the SEC file number is 1-9656. Exhibits not
incorporated by reference are being filed or furnished with this report.
66
(3) Exhibits:
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as part of this report:
Exhibit
Number
(2)
(3.1)
(3.2)
(3.3)
(3.4)
(4.1)
(9)
(10.1)*
(10.2)*
(10.3)*
(10.4)*
(10.5)*
(10.6)*
(10.7)*
(10.8)*
(10.9)*
Not applicable
Description
La-Z-Boy Incorporated Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to an
exhibit to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 26, 1996)
Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to
Form 10-K/A filed September 27, 1999)
La-Z-Boy Incorporated Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation effective August 22,
2008 (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 25, 2008)
La-Z-Boy Incorporated Amended and Restated Bylaws (as of May 3, 2011) (Incorporated by
reference to an exhibit to Form 8-K filed May 6, 2011)
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 19, 2011, among La-Z-Boy
Incorporated, certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo Capital
Finance, LLC, as administrative agent for the lenders (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to
Form 8-K filed October 21, 2011)
Not applicable
La-Z-Boy Incorporated Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, amended and restated
through August 12, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to definitive proxy statement
dated July 9, 2003)
La-Z-Boy Incorporated Deferred Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Incorporated by
reference to an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 25, 2008)
La-Z-Boy Incorporated 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to an
exhibit to definitive proxy statement dated June 27, 1997)
Form of Change in Control Agreement in effect for: Kurt L. Darrow. Similar agreements are in
effect for Steven M. Kincaid, Louis M. Riccio, Jr., Otis Sawyer and Mark S. Bacon, Sr., except
the provisions related to the periods for protection and benefits are twenty-four months
(Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 24, 2010)
Form of Indemnification Agreement (covering all directors, including employee-directors)
(Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 8-K, filed January 22, 2009)
2005 La-Z-Boy Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated as of
November 18, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 24, 2009)
La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2004 Long-Term Equity Award Plan as amended through June 13, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 26, 2008)
First 2009 Amendment to La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2004 Long-Term Equity Award Plan effective
June 11, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 25, 2009)
Second 2009 Amendment to La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2004 Long-Term Equity Award Plan
effective June 15, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 25, 2009)
(10.10)*
(10.11)*
Sample award agreement under the 2004 Long-Term Equity Award Plan ( Incorporated by
reference to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 29, 2006 )
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan - Description as of June 16, 2006 ( Incorporated by
reference to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 29, 2006 )
67
Exhibit
Number
(10.12)*
(10.13)*
(10.14)*
Description
La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Annex A to
definitive proxy statement for annual meeting of shareholders held August 18, 2010)
La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan Sample Award Agreement (Incorporated by
reference to an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 23, 2010)
First 2010 Amendment to La-Z-Boy Incorporated 2004 Long-Term Equity Award Plan effective
June 11, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 24, 2010)
(10.15)*
La-Z-Boy Incorporated Severance Plan for Named Executive Officers (Incorporated by reference
to an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 24, 2010)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings (See Note 17 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 8)
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
(16)
Not applicable
(18)
Not applicable
(21)
List of subsidiaries of La-Z-Boy Incorporated
(22)
Not applicable
(23)
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (EDGAR filing only)
(24)
Not applicable
(31.1)
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
(31.2)
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
(32)
Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(33)
Not applicable
(34)
Not applicable
(35)
Not applicable
(95)
Not applicable.
(99)
Not applicable
(100)
Not applicable
(101.INS) XBRL Instance Document
(101.SCH) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
(101.CAL) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
(101.LAB) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
(101.PRE) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
(101.DEF) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
*
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement under which a director or
executive officer may receive benefits.
68
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule
To the Board of Directors of La-Z-Boy Incorporated:
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting referred to in our report dated June 19, 2012 appearing in this Form 10-K also included an audit of
the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial
statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
June 19, 2012
69
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(Dollars in thousands)
Additions
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
Charged to
Other
Accounts
Deductions
Balance at
End of
Year
$23,937
20,196
28,385
$3,533
5,687
4,090
$ —
—
(2,597)(a)
$ (4,765)(b)
(1,946)(b)
(9,682)(b)
$22,705
23,937
20,196
Description
Allowance for doubtful accounts,
deducted from accounts receivable:
April 28, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 24, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for doubtful accounts,
deducted from notes receivable:
April 28, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 24, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for deferred tax assets:
$ 2,067
1,004
4,309
$ 663
1,510
2,445
$ 160
4,582
5,830
$ —
—
2,597(a)
$ (1,193)(b)
(447)(b)
(8,347)(b)
$ 1,537
2,067
1,004
$ —
(8,726)(d)
—
$(46,202)(e)
(1,554)(c)
(7,852)(c)
$10,980
57,022
62,720
April 28, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 24, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$57,022
62,720
64,742
(a) Represents transfer of reserve from accounts receivable to notes receivable.
(b) Deductions represented uncollectible accounts written off less recoveries of accounts receivable written
off in prior years.
(c) Represents utilization of loss carryovers.
(d) Represents impact of adjusting gross deferred tax assets.
(e) Valuation allowance reversals.
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: June 19, 2012
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
BY /s/ Kurt L. Darrow
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below, as of
June 19, 2012, by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.
/s/ K.L. Darrow
K.L. Darrow
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Director
/s/ J.H. Foss
J.H. Foss
Director
/s/ R.M. Gabrys
R.M. Gabrys
Director
/s/ H.G. Levy
H.G. Levy
Director
/s/ W.A. McCollough
W.A. McCollough
Director
/s/ J.E. Kerr
J.E. Kerr
Director
/s/ D.K. Hehl
D.K. Hehl
Director
/s/ E.J. Holman
E.J. Holman
Director
/s/ N.R. Qubein
N.R. Qubein
Director
/s/ J.L. Gurwitch
J.L. Gurwitch
Director
/s/ M.L. Mueller
M.L. Mueller
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
/s/ L.M. Riccio, Jr.
L.M. Riccio, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
71
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Kurt L. Darrow
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
John H. Foss
Retired Manufacturing Financial Executive
Director of United Bancorp, Inc.
Richard M. Gabrys
Lead Director
Retired Vice Chairman of Deloitte & Touche LLP
Director of CMS Energy Corp.
Director of TriMas Corporation
Janet L. Gurwitch
Chairman of Gurwitch Consulting Group, LLC
Director of Drybar Holdings, LLC
Director of Urban Decay Cosmetics, LLC
Operating Partner of Castanea Partners, Inc.
W. Alan McCollough
Former Chairman and CEO, Circuit City Stores, Inc.
Director of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Director of VF Corporation
Nido R. Qubein
President, High Point University
Chairman, Great Harvest Bread Company
Director of BB&T Corporation
Director of Dots, LLC
David K. Hehl
Member, Cooley Hehl Wohlgamuth & Carlton, PLLC
Edwin J. Holman
Chairman of the Board, The Pantry, Inc.
Chairman of the Board, RGIS International
Janet E. Kerr
Professor of Law and Executive Director, The Palmer
Center for Entrepreneurship and the Law at
Pepperdine University School of Law
Director of Tilly’s, Inc.
Director of TCW Strategic Income Fund, Inc.
Director of TCW Funds, Inc.
Dr. H. George Levy
Otorhinolaryngologist
CORPORATE EXECUTIVES
CORPORATE EXECUTIVES
Kurt L. Darrow
Chairman , President and Chief Executive Officer
Greg A. Brinks
VP and Treasurer
OTHER EXECUTIVES
OTHER EXECUTIVES
R. Jack Richardson, Jr.
President, American Drew, Lea and Hammary
Louis M. Riccio, Jr.
Senior VP and Chief Financial Officer
J. Douglas Collier
Chief Marketing Officer and President International
James A. Wiygul
President, Bauhaus
Mark S. Bacon, Sr.
Senior VP/President La-Z-Boy Branded Business
Daniel F. Deland
Chief Information Officer
Steven M. Kincaid
Senior VP/President Casegoods and
President, Kincaid
Otis S. Sawyer
Senior VP/President Non-Branded Upholstery
and President, England, Inc.
James P. Klarr
Secretary and Corporate Counsel
Margaret L. Mueller
VP, Corporate Controller and Assistant Treasurer
Steven P. Rindskopf
Corporate VP Human Resources
R. Rand Tucker
VP and General Counsel
INVESTOR INFORMATION
INVESTOR INFORMATION
Shareholder Services
Inquiries regarding the Dividend Reinvestment Plan,
dividend payments, stock transfer requirements, address
changes and account consolidations should be addressed to
the company’s stock transfer agent and registrar:
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
800-937-5449
www.amstock.com/main
Stock Exchange
La-Z-Boy Incorporated common shares are traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol LZB.
Corporate Headquarters
La‑Z‑Boy Incorporated
1284 North Telegraph Road
Monroe, MI 48162
734-242-1444
www.la-z-boy.com
Investor Relations and Financial Reports
We will provide the Form 10-K to any shareholder who
requests it. Security analysts, shareholders and investors
may request information from:
Investor Relations
La‑Z‑Boy Incorporated
1284 North Telegraph Road
Monroe, MI 48162
investorrelations@la-z-boy.com
734-241-2438
©2012 La-Z-Boy Incorporated. Except as noted, all designated trademarks and service marks utilized in this report are owned by La-Z-Boy Incorporated or its subsidiary companies.
Shareholders’ Meeting
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
11:00 AM EDT
La‑Z‑Boy Auditorium
1284 North Telegraph Road
Monroe, Michigan USA
Shown: Keagan Chair & Leo Ottoman
Front Cover: Allegra Chairs & Demi Sofas
2012 AnnuAL RepoRt
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
FAMILYcomfortCOMMUNITYDURABILITYINNOVATIONmade inamericacustomizationqual-communityheritageCUSTOMfamilyQUALITYtogetherLOYALTYfamily
1284 North Telegraph Road • Monroe, Michigan 48162 USA
la-z-boy.com • americandrew.com • bauhaususa.com • englandfurniture.com • hammary.com • kincaidfurniture.com • leafurniture.com • lazboykidz.com
Printed in the USA
2012 ANNUAL REPORT
FAMILYcomfortCOMMUNITYDURABILITYINNOVATIONmade inamericacustomizationqualitycommunityheritageCUSTOMfamilyQUALITYtogetherLOYALTYfamily