More annual reports from Li-S Energy Limited:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Li-S Energy Limited:
LittelfuseAnnual Report
2022
There’s a better battery on the horizon
Li-S Energy LimitedContents
2 Chairman’s Report
6 Directors‘ Report
26 Auditor’s Independence Declaration
27 Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income
28 Statement of Financial Position
29 Statement of Cash Flows
30 Statement of Changes in Equity
32 Notes to the Financial Statements
59 Directors’ Declaration
60
65 Shareholder Information
67 Corporate Directory
Independent Auditor’s Report
With climate change driving
the move to renewable energy
and electric vehicles (EVs), the
demand for batteries is forecast
to increase 10x by 2030*.
To drive this growth, industry is demanding more
energy dense, lighter, faster, environmentally
friendly batteries.
Li-S Energy has developed a new lithium-sulphur
(Li-S) battery using boron nitride nanotubes
(BNNTs) to increase energy density well beyond
that of lithium-ion batteries, while extending
Li-S battery cycle life.
* ‘Electric Vehicle Outlook 2020’, BloombergNEF (Bloomberg Finance L.P.)
1
Annual Report 2022Chairman’s Report
Ben Spincer, Chairman
Dear Shareholders,
2022 was an exciting year for Li-S
Energy (LIS) as we transitioned
from a privately held venture to our
listing on the ASX on 28 September
2021. Whilst the pandemic and
a challenging geopolitical and
economic environment have
presented challenges, I am delighted
that LIS has achieved or exceeded the
challenging goals we set ourselves
in our prospectus, culminating in
test flights of drones powered by our
lithium-sulphur and lithium metal
batteries (see www.lis.energy/news
for the videos). In achieving this, I
must recognise the support of my
Board members Robin Levison, Tony
McDonald and Hedy Cray, plus the
tireless efforts of the management
team led by CEO Dr Lee Finniear with
support from CTO Dr Steve Rowlands
and Chief Strategic Advisor, Glenn
Molloy.
2
“ Whilst the pandemic and
a challenging geopolitical
and economic environment
have presented challenges,
I am delighted that LIS has
achieved or exceeded the
challenging goals we set
ourselves in our prospectus”
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Over the last three years, LIS, has
worked with Deakin University
(Deakin) to commercialise over
a decade of research in the
development of a lithium-sulphur
battery that utilises boron nitride
nanotubes (BNNTs) as a nano-
insulator to improve performance
and cycle life.
Lithium-sulphur batteries (also known
as Li-S batteries) have the potential
to provide a much greater energy
storage capacity than current lithium-
ion batteries and much of the science
behind them is well established.
However, to date lithium-sulphur’s
main drawback has been a relatively
short cycle life, inhibiting their mass
adoption. By using BNNTs and other
novel materials, LIS has substantially
increased cycle life in our lithium-
sulphur batteries. Test cells have now
demonstrated sustained performance
over 1000 charge/discharge cycles
whilst retaining a specific capacity
almost three times that of a typical
commercial lithium-ion battery. We
have also been able to extend our
innovation to another high energy
density technology, lithium-metal
batteries, with early results showing
improved capacity retention and
dendrite reduction.
2022 progress was not just limited
to research and development, with
the signing of a number of significant
collaboration agreements. Of note
were our agreements with Insitu
Boeing to develop batteries for its
uncrewed aircraft systems and our
partnership with Janus Electric
to support the evolution of prime
movers into electric vehicles.
Professor Ian Chen and his team at
Deakin University continue to lead our
core research program to support the
scale production of lithium-sulphur
batteries and they have made great
progress over the year, going from
single layer pouch cells to ten layer
cells and finally twenty layer cells
that we are currently preparing for
testing. We have also been able to
augment Professor Chen’s work with
the world-renowned capabilities of
Professor Maria Forsyth and her team,
also at Deakin, who have brought
their expertise to the development
of our lithium anodes and cutting-
edge electrolytes. This collaboration
between the teams of two leading
Professors at Deakin will allow LIS
to move into the next generation
of semi- and solid-state LIS battery
development, which we expect to
yield even higher energy density
and cycle life.
Li-S Energy LimitedIn our IPO prospectus we set out our five development
priorities for our first 12 months as a listed company, namely:
Lithium-sulphur battery optimisation
and production of multi-layer cells
Li-nanomesh anode protection
for a range of battery chemistries
Pilot cell production in our Deakin
University facilities
Retrofitting batteries into products,
exemplified by the drone flights
utilising our cells
Modelling and simulation to better
understand the performance of our
batteries and reduce testing times
1
2
3
4
5
3
Annual Report 2022Chairman’s Report
continued
– Leveraging our outstanding lab
results to access industrial and
research opportunities in Europe,
including the Fraunhofer Institute
in Germany
– LIS has joined the Future
Battery Industry CRC giving it
access to leading researchers
and partners across Australia
and is also a foundational
industry partner in the Deakin
Recycling and Renewable Energy
Commercialisation Hub as part
of the Commonwealth Trailblazer
University program that should
result in close to $5 million
of additional funding over its
four years.
Over the nine months to the end of
June 2022 we remain on target for
these priorities, in spite of the ongoing
challenges of the pandemic through
an extended lock down in Victoria
and ongoing supply chain disruption.
We have also taken advantage of
additional opportunities as they have
arisen, including:
– Consideration of additional growth
opportunities, both organic and
inorganic. In particular, we have
identified our clear competitive
advantage in providing batteries
for drones and heavy vehicles (e.g.
prime movers and mining) and
have deepening partnerships in
both areas
– Extending our investment in safe
and novel electrolyte compositions
with a plan to incorporate a semi-
solid- state electrolyte into our
batteries where appropriate
4
SHAREHOLDER SUPPORT
To achieve the results to date, LIS has
relied upon the continued support
of its major shareholders, PPK Group
Limited, Deakin University and BNNT
Technology Limited. However, the
Company could not have achieved its
goals this year without the ongoing
support of new shareholders and the
funds raised through the IPO and pre-
IPO raises.
This capital has ensured that not only
can the company fund its ongoing
development work, but also retained a
healthy balance sheet with $43.9m of
cash and cash equivalents at the end
of the 2022 financial year. This gives us
the strategic flexibility to continue to
invest in and develop opportunities as
they arise.
We thank current and new
shareholders for their support of LIS.
OUTLOOK
Worldwide demand for energy
storage in all its forms is increasing
exponentially. This is driven by the
demand for electric vehicles (EVs),
drones, grid storage solutions, plus
any number of portable devices. Li-S
Energy is positioned at the leading
edge of this demand, with the IP
position, expertise and balance sheet
strength to compete successfully
across multiple industries.
Our core goal is to develop an
affordable, lithium-sulphur battery
with a significantly higher gravimetric
energy density and comparable cycle
life to existing batteries. Currently, we
anticipate that these batteries can
have the greatest near- term impact in
the drone and heavy vehicle markets
and our strategic collaboration with
Boeing InSitu and Janus Electric
reflect that.
As our research program progresses,
we are also turning our attention
to ensuring that our batteries are
manufactured at scale. Initially, this
will be in our own 2MWh Phase 3
facility, but subsequently will require
the investment in either a dedicated
gigafactory or IP licensing to third
party manufacturers.
Li-S Energy LimitedAs we discussed in our prospectus,
the LIS research and development
program is designed to provide a
path to deliver Li-S Energy batteries,
materials and intellectual property
to market and has the following four
primary goals that we are progressing
against:
1.
Further optimise LIS technology
During FY22 we commenced
testing 10-layer lithium-sulphur
cells with BNNT and Li-nanomesh,
having successfully completed our
4-layer cell testing earlier in the
year. During FY23 we will continue
to test 10-layer cells, and to build
and test 20-layer cells, to assess
the technology’s performance
in larger format cells with a lower
electrolyte loading. This will help
maximise the energy density in
commercial cells.
Assuming the 10-layer and
20-layer cell test results are in
line with expectations, and in
consultation with collaborating
Product OEM partners, we then
expect to produce appropriate test
cells for OEM partner testing.
2.
Produce Li-S Energy batteries
in pouch, cylinder and flexible
battery formats
Having assessed the detailed
requirements of our target
industries, we are focusing our
development strategy on the
production of cells in the pouch
cell format given its flexibility to
scale to large battery packs for
commercial use.
Pouch cells also offer the potential
for higher cell gravimetric energy
density as we can minimise
“inactive materials” such as the
weight of cell casings & electrodes.
3.
Build pilot production line,
manufacture batteries and prove
their benefits in commercial
products with commercial
partners
During FY22 we recognised
that we needed to enhance
our ability to produce larger
numbers of multi-layer test
cells more quickly, in advance of
building our planned initial pilot
production line. As a result, we
re-engineered our cell production
plan to include a second phase
of lab scale production to sit
between our research production
and automated pilot line. We
are currently in the process of
commissioning this Phase 2
capability in new labs on the
Deakin campus with the pilot
phase also being purchased for
delivery and installation through
the year into our 2MWh Phase 3
facility.
4.
Develop intellectual property
on how lithium-ion battery
manufacturing plants can be
adapted to produce Li-S Energy
batteries
Our Phase 3 production line is
the key infrastructure we expect
to drive the process of examining
lithium-ion cell manufacturing
equipment and how it can be
practically modified to suit the
manufacture of Li-S Energy
lithium-sulphur and lithium
metal cells. Additional IP may be
identified during this process that
could provide additional value to
the Company.
During Phase 3 operation we also
expect to derive operating and
production data that will assist battery
manufacturers on the metrics of
how to build appropriate large scale
manufacturing lines, or to adapt
current lithium-ion manufacturing to
suit Li-S Energy cell manufacture.
We also remain alert for
complementary ventures,
technologies, facilities and acquisitions
in the broader battery space that have
the potential to deliver benefits in
terms of technology or market access.
In all cases, the Board will assess such
opportunities against the overall
potential to create shareholder value.
Yours sincerely,
Ben Spincer
Chairman
5
Annual Report 2022Directors‘ Report
for the year ended 30 June 2022
The directors of Li-S Energy Limited (“Li-S Energy”, “LIS” or the “Company”) present their report together with the financial
statements of the company for the financial year ended 30 June 2022.
INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS
Details of the current Directors’ and experience are detailed below:
Dr Ben Spincer
MA, PhD, GAICD. (Age 50)
Non-Executive Director
and Chairman
Appointed: 18 March 2021
Ben was the Executive
Director of Deakin Research
Innovations, responsible for
Deakin’s commercial research
partnerships, as well as the
commercialisation and translation
of the University’s research and
oversight of the ManuFutures
advanced manufacturing scale-
up facility. He was a member
of the Victorian Government
Innovation Taskforce in 2020 and
represented Deakin on a number
of research centre and institutes
Boards.
Prior to joining Deakin in 2015,
Ben was Director of Technology
Strategy and Innovation at
Telstra, working with the Chief
Technology Officer to oversee
the long-term technology
strategy of the company and
to instil a culture of innovation
in the company. From 2007 to
2013, Ben was the Director of
Investor Relations for Telstra,
managing relationships between
the company and its shareholders
after its full privatisation.
Previously, Ben was Vice
President and financial analyst at
Credit Suisse in London covering
the European telecom industry.
Committee Membership
A Audit and Risk Committee
Chair of Committee
Member of Committee
6
Mr Robin Levison
CA, MBA, FAICD. (Age 64)
Non-Executive Director
A
Mr Anthony McDonald
LL.B. (Age 64)
Non-Executive Director
A
A
Ms Hedy Cray
LL.B. (Hons), LL.M. (Age 49)
Non-Executive Director
Appointed: 12 July 2019
Appointed: 12 July 2019
Appointed: 21 April 2021
Tony McDonald graduated
with a Bachelor of Laws from
the Queensland University of
Technology in 1981 and was
admitted as a solicitor in 1981.
He has been involved in the
natural resource sector for
many years both within Australia
and internationally and for the
past 20 years has held senior
management roles in this sector.
He is a Non-Executive Director
of a number of PPK’s related
companies including unlisted
public company White Graphene
Limited and private company
Strategic Alloys Pty Ltd.
Other listed public company
directorships held in the last
3 years:
– Member of the PPK Group
Limited Board since 13
September 2017.
– Santana Minerals Limited,
Non-Executive Director
(Appointed: December 2019,
Executive Director 15 January
2013 to December 2019)
Hedy graduated with a Bachelor
of Laws with Honours in 1996
and a Master of Laws in 1999
from Queensland University
of Technology. For over 26
years Hedy worked in private
legal practice, first becoming
a partner in 2001. Hedy joined
Clayton Utz in 2003 and spent
almost 19 years growing and
leading its Workplace Relations
Employment and Safety team to
4 partners before retiring from
the partnership in 2022.
Hedy is currently the Executive
Vice President of Global Affairs
for Korea Zinc, one of the world’s
largest metal smelting operators
with interests in green and
renewable energies, including
developing solar and wind power,
green hydrogen production,
battery recycling and e-waste.
Hedy has extensive experience
in commercial and corporate
strategy, risk management,
corporate governance,
acquisitions and company
restructuring as well as
employment, human capital
and safety and has worked
with multinationals across
energy, renewable resources,
manufacturing, transport and
logistics and the government
sector. Hedy served as a Director
of the Clayton Utz Foundation
for 6 years, the firm’s body
responsible for giving back to the
community which has distributed
almost $12m of grants to over 270
charities since 2003.
Robin Levison has more than
25 years of public company
management and board
experience. During this time,
he has served as Managing
Director at Industrea Limited and
Spectrum Resources Limited
and has held senior roles at
KPMG, Barclays Bank and Merrill
Lynch. He is a Non-Executive
Director of PPK Group Limited
(“PPK”), and a number of PPK’s
related companies including
unlisted public companies White
Graphene Limited (“WGL”),
BNNT Technology Limited
(“BNNTTL”) and BNNT Precious
Metals Limited and private
companies including 3D Dental
Technology Pty Ltd, Ballistic
Glass Pty Ltd, Strategic Alloys Pty
Ltd, AMAG Holdings Australia Pty
Ltd, Survivon Pty Ltd and Craig
International Ballistics Pty Ltd.
Robin holds a Master of
Business Administration from
the University of Queensland,
is a Member of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants Australia
and NZ and is a Graduate and
Fellow of Australian Institute
of Company Directors. Robin
recently retired as Chair of
the University of Queensland
Business, Economics and Law
Alumni Ambassador Council.
Other listed public company
directorships held in the last
3 years:
– Member of the PPK Group
Limited Board since 22
October 2013.
– Executive Chairman from
22 October 2013 to 29 April
2015 and re-appointed from
28 February 2016 to 30 June
2022.
– Non-Executive Chairman from
29 April 2015 to 28 February
2016 and since 1 July 2022
onwards.
– Mighty Craft Limited (formerly
Founders First Limited), Non-
executive Director & Chairman
(Appointed: 17 December
2019)
Li-S Energy LimitedThe directors of Li-S Energy Limited (“Li-S Energy”, “LIS” or the “Company”) present their report together with the financial
statements of the company for the financial year ended 30 June 2022.
DIRECTORS
The following persons were Directors in office at any time during or since the beginning of the financial year:
Ben Spincer
Robin Levison
Anthony McDonald
Hedy Cray
INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS
Please see page 6.
INFORMATION ON COMPANY SECRETARIES
Will Shiel BA in Law (Hons) FGIA (Age 40)
Appointed Company Secretary on 30 June 2022.
Will was appointed as General Counsel and Company Secretary for PPK Group Limited on 20 August 2021. He specialises in
all aspects of commercial law, with a particular focus on contracts and cutting-edge technology transactions.
Before joining PPK, Will was Head of Technology at ASX Limited where he managed a legal team responsible for technology,
intellectual property and data matters. Before this, he held a variety of senior positions in Brisbane, Sydney and London at
leading national and international law firms.
Liam Fairhall BLaw (Hons); BMed Rad Sci; Grad Dip ACGRM; (Age 41)
Appointed Company Secretary on 30 June 2022.
Liam is the Deputy General Counsel for PPK Group Limited. He specialises in all aspects of corporate law and governance
and has acted on a wide range of complex transactions, assisted multiple companies list on the ASX and advised Boards on a
diverse range of regulatory and compliance issues. Before joining PPK, Liam was Head of Legal and Company Secretary at a
technology focussed bank that specialises in the provision of payment products and financial crimes services. Before this, he
was a Senior Associate in the Corporate Advisory Group of one of Brisbane’s largest independent law firms.
Mr Ken Hostland CA/CPA (Canada), MBA, BCom (Age 64)
Appointed as Company Secretary on 12 July 2019, resigned 30 June 2022.
Mr Andrew Cooke LL.B. (age 61)
Appointed as Company Secretary on 8 July 2021, resigned 30 June 2022.
Pat Rogers (Age 51) BLaws, BBus Accy, FGIA
Appointed as Company Secretary on 4 May 2021, resigned on 26 July 2021.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
LIS was incorporated on 12 July 2019 with the objective of utilising BNNT Technology Limited’s (BNNTTL) and Deakin University’s
(Deakin) existing technology and research to develop a battery technology based on more advanced lithium-sulphur chemistry,
where BNNTs and other nanomaterials are incorporated into battery components to:
–
–
Improve battery energy capacity when compared to current lithium-ion batteries; and
Improve cycle life when compared to conventional lithium-sulphur batteries.
LIS issued a Prospectus in August 2021 which identified eight Development Program Components that underpin the
principal activities of LIS. In the year ending 30 June 2022, LIS has advanced a number of these programs to further research
and development of the Li-S battery and has demonstrated the efficacy of our technology through drone test flights using
LIS’s lithium-sulphur and lithium metal batteries.
As noted in our Prospectus, LIS does not currently generate any significant revenue and intends to derive revenue from the
following activities:
– Supplying BNNT and Li-Nanomesh materials and know-how in relation to the application of BNNTs and Li-Nanomesh in
the construction of a battery to battery manufacturers in order to enable them to produce Li-S batteries, Li-Nanomesh and
know-how for other forms of battery that can make use of this material;
– Engaging product OEMs in collaborative projects to retrofit and test Li-S batteries in their products; and
– Licensing LIS’s intellectual property to battery manufacturers so they can produce LIS batteries for product OEMs.
7
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
Many of the activities undertaken to generate international awareness of LIS are a step toward generating revenues as noted
above. The Company’s Directors and Executives have:
– met with leading battery research companies and laboratories in Europe to demonstrate the L-S battery technology and
–
–
seek participation to expedite the development program.
attended the Battery Show Europe and Electric & Hybrid Vehicle Technologies Expo in Stuttgart Germany with over 550
exhibitions from battery manufacturers, vehicle manufacturers and industry specialists.
sponsored the International Meeting on Lithium Batteries 2022 in Sydney, Australia with over 800 delegates attending from
around the world with specialty interests and experience in lithium battery technologies.
As a result of these meetings, LIS has obtained an international awareness from leading battery manufacturers and industry
experts and is seeking further opportunities to engage in research, development and manufacturing of both Li-S batteries
and the Li-metal technologies with the potential to supply BNNT and Li-Nanomesh materials and know-how for current
battery manufacturers. These are expanded in further detail in the Product Development Strategy.
As noted below, LIS has signed two strategic collaboration agreements to date which provide an opportunity to retrofit and
test Li-S batteries in their products. In addition, LIS has successfully flown a commercial drone on multiple test flights using
10-layer lithium-sulphur and lithium metal test cells.
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
The Company has seen significant development successes through this financial year, including scaling our lithium-sulphur
test cells from single layer to 20-layer cells now under construction, building our first 10-layer lithium metal test cells and
successfully completing our first drone test flights.
On the commercial side we have entered into strategic collaboration agreements with Boeing’s Insitu Pacific in the drone
target market and Janus Electric in the heavy EV target market. These collaborations will enable us to hone in on the battery
requirements of each product category, while we continue our testing, optimise our cell chemistry and scale up the size and
volume of our cell production capability.
The company continues to pursue its business and development strategies as outlined in its IPO Prospectus and we have
achieved significant technical successes which have enabled us to refine these strategies.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
The Development Strategy in our IPO Prospectus identified four key areas of strategic focus:
1. Further optimise Li-S technology
2.
3.
Produce Li-S Energy batteries in pouch, cylinder and flexible battery formats
Build pilot production line, manufacture batteries, and prove their benefits in commercial products with commercial
partners
Develop intellectual property on how lithium-ion battery manufacturing plants can be adapted to produce Li-S Energy
Batteries
4.
During this financial year we have refined and focused this strategy as follows:
Further optimise Li-S technology
1.
We continued our research and development to improve our battery materials, optimise the use of BNNT and Li-nanomesh
and improve construction and material coating techniques to drive cell performance.
A key part of this work is scaling test cells from coin cells and single layer pouch cells, to successively larger multi-layer pouch
cells that provide performance data more consistent with target commercial cells in production.
Lithium-sulphur cells
We built and commenced testing 10-layer lithium-sulphur pouch cells with BNNT and Li-nanomesh protection, having
successfully completed 4-layer cell testing earlier in the year. Looking forward, we expect to continue to test these 10-layer
cells, build and test 20-layer cells, and to optimise the electrolyte loading to further enhance gravimetric energy density.
Assuming the 10-layer and 20-layer cell test results are in line with expectations, and in consultation with collaborating
Product OEM partners, we then expect to fine tune the engineering design of the cells to suit relevant partner requirements,
and to produce appropriate test cells for OEM partner testing.
Lithium metal cells
Based on the positive performance achieved with Li-nanomesh in mitigating dendrite formation in lithium symmetric test
cells, we have built a series of multi-layer (10-layer) lithium metal cells which are currently undergoing testing. Initial results
from these cells are positive and indicate that we have reduced “capacity fade” in early cycling compared to unprotected cells,
and we are continuing these tests to verify the initial results.
8
Li-S Energy LimitedSemi-Solid State & Advanced Electrolytes
In parallel with cell scale-up work, we expect to continue several other important lines of development started during the
financial year including:
– Development of semi-solid-state lithium-sulphur cells: this work holds the potential to deliver a lithium-sulphur cell
protected by BNNT and Li-nanomesh with an even higher gravimetric energy density, lower electrolyte loading and with
additional safety enhancements.
– Development of higher performance electrolytes: for lithium-sulphur and lithium metal cells. We expect this key
research and development, being undertaken in part with the support of the Future Battery Industries CRC, to establish an
optimum formulation of electrolyte to maximise the performance of Li-S Energy batteries. This work includes liquid,
gel and solid-state candidate electrolyte compositions.
Our development and testing to date has been carried out by scientists from Deakin University’s Institute of Frontier Materials
under a Research Framework Agreement and we are pleased to continue this close working relationship.
Moving forward we intend to expand our scientific team and to also engage Fraunhofer IWS, Dresden, Germany to conduct
complementary lithium-sulphur cell development & testing, and to develop additional manufacturing techniques. Fraunhofer
IWS is a pioneer in lithium-sulphur cell research and is highly respected in the European battery industry. We foresee
synergistic areas of IP and expertise where this collaboration has the potential to accelerate our path to commercialisation.
We are also supporting research into lithium-sulphur cathode materials at the University of Queensland.
While we are confident that our test results to date are likely to scale to provide the expected performance in full commercial
cells, we note that this has yet to be proven, which is the rationale for our continued development, testing and cell optimisation
activities.
To maintain our sharp focus on scaling and optimising the development of our lithium-sulphur and lithium metal cells and to
align with the market demand, during FY23 we do not expect to proceed with the 3D printed & flexible Li-S battery projects
originally identified in the IPO prospectus.
2. Produce Li-S Energy Batteries in pouch, cylinder and flexible battery formats
Having assessed the detailed requirements of our target industries, we are now focusing our development strategy on the
production of cells in the pouch cell format.
Pouch cells offer the potential for higher cell gravimetric energy density as we can minimise “inactive materials” such as the
weight of cell casings and electrodes, so reducing the overall weight of the cell. Pouch cells also give an advantage to battery
pack designers to use optimised rectangular pack dimensions, each with a reduced connection complexity due to fewer,
larger capacity cells being needed.
Cylinder cells, by contrast, require the use of metal alloy cylinder cases, metal end caps & connectors which encase relatively
small volumes of active material, this “dead weight” reducing overall cell energy density. From a volumetric energy density
perspective, cylindrical cells inevitably increase the overall volume of a battery pack due to voids between the stacked cylinder
cells. Many EV manufacturers avoid the use of the cylinder cell format for these reasons.
We note that if a requirement for cylinder cells arises in the future, the company expects to be able to adapt its cell production
capability through the purchase of commercially available cylinder cell production equipment.
We recognise that flexible battery formats are of interest in certain niche markets, however we believe our priority and focus
needs to be on pouch cells at this stage of our commercialisation journey due to the far larger market potential of this format.
Advancements in our pouch cell performance and materials will accelerate flexible battery format development if we choose
to pursue this in future years.
3.
Build pilot production line, manufacture batteries, and prove their benefits in commercial products with
commercial partners
During the year, in consultation with our OEM collaboration partners, we identified 3 evaluation steps that OEMs are expected
to employ when assessing new battery technologies:
– Step 1 – Cell assessment – testing individual cells for initial performance in simulated mission test profiles, followed by
compliance assessments
– Step 2 – Battery module assessment – building and testing a complete battery module with test cells
– Step 3 – full flight/drive performance assessment – acquiring sufficient matched cells to build sufficient battery modules
to enable full product testing (EV/Drone/Aircraft)
9
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
To enable earlier engagement in this evaluation process, we have re-engineered our cell production plan into 3 phases:
Phase 1 – R&D Cell Construction
This involves the manual construction of cells using laboratory techniques and tools and is the process we have been using
to date. This is a suitable process to produce small numbers of coin cells, single layer pouch cells and small multi-layer pouch
cells. It enables our scientists to build individual cells, optimise cell materials and complete initial performance testing.
However, it is labour intensive and requires a high level of care and skill to produce each cell.
Phase 2 – Lab scale Cell Production
To increase the speed and quality of test cell production, during FY22 we invested in a suite of cell production equipment,
including two roll-to-roll coaters for cathode production and separator coating, plus equipment for slurry preparation,
electrode die cutting, electrode stacking, welding, pouching and cell testing. In the coming months we expect this equipment
to significantly enhance the number and quality of multi-layer test cells we can produce for internal testing, while also allowing
us to deliver initial test cells to collaborating OEM Partners.
Phase 3 – Enhanced Cell Production
Our planned Phase 3 is expected to increase our capacity to produce larger numbers of high quality, matched commercial
sized cells using automated cell production equipment in our expanded facilities.
We expect the facility to include dry rooms and clean room within which the cell production equipment will operate. We are
in discussion with battery manufacturing equipment companies in Europe, USA and Asia to purchase the most appropriate
machinery for the line.
We expect to complete the dry rooms and clean room during the coming financial year assuming current supply chain
timelines do not further degrade. We anticipate finalising Phase 3 equipment suppliers and placing orders progressively
across the next 6-9 months, with delivery times expected to be between 4 and 12 months from date of order.
4.
Develop intellectual property on how lithium-ion battery manufacturing plants can be adapted to produce
Li-S Energy Batteries
During Phase 3 development, commissioning and operation we expect to develop IP on the use of lithium-ion cell
manufacturing equipment and how it can be practically modified to suit the manufacture of Li-S Energy lithium-sulphur and
lithium metal cells. We also expect certain production processes to require bespoke equipment.
Once Phase 3 is operating we expect to derive operating IP and production data that is likely to assist battery manufacturers
to understand processes and metrics to scale to full manufacture.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
In our Prospectus, we identified seven key aspects of Li-S battery construction. Based on the development undertaken to
date, we have lodged the following three patents this year:
Flexible battery/polysulfone separator invention
The PCT application for the flexible battery/polysulfone separator invention was successful converted into national or regional
patent applications in relevant jurisdictions.
Protected cathodes invention
The International Patent Application, PCT/AU2022/050237 for the protected cathodes invention was successfully filed on
17 March 2022.
Protected anode invention
The International Patent Application, PCT/AU2022/050267 for the protected anodes invention was successfully filed on
17 March 2022.
10
Li-S Energy LimitedFINANCIAL RESULTS
For the financial year ended 30 June 2022 LIS incurred a loss of $6,271,817 (2021: $1,684,391 loss) which is predominantly due to:
– $406,916 (2021: nil) for employee expenses, mainly the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer who were
employed for the full year
– $2,382,161 (2021: $1,193,104) for IPO related costs associated with the capital raise and listing on the ASX;
– $813,630 (2021: $218,042) for professional costs including:
– $167,152 legal fees for patents and trademarks and preparation of agreements associated with the IPO
– $324,662 company secretarial costs, investor relations costs, registrar costs and listing fees
– $321,816 consulting costs for strategic advice, risk management and cybersecurity
– $600,000 (2021: $200,000) management fees paid to PPK Aust Pty Ltd for shared support services under the
Management Services Agreement
– $820,657 (2021: $127,058) share based payments expense which is a non-cash item to recognise the cost of the service
rights issued to Non-Executive Directors and Executives
– $1,272,316 (2021: $108,793) for administration costs inclusive of insurance, travel, technology, memberships and other
LIS had an unrealized gain on its investments in Zeta Energy Corp. of $251,736 (2021: $289,638 loss). The Company also
earned interest of $42,374 (2021: nil) and rental income of $47,924 (2021: nil) from sub-leasing one of its premises for a part of
the year.
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIS completed its capital raise of $34,000,000 and has commenced the Development Program Components as identified
in the Prospectus. As a result, it has increased the strength of its balance sheet with total assets of $52,017,823 (2021:
$23,193,407) consisting of:
– $43,853,377 (2021: $18,606,698) of cash
– $3,317,963 (2021: $991,863) of intangible assets
– $1,091,554 (2021: $120,773) of property, plant and equipment
– $2,509,798 (2021: $2,258,062) being the fair value of its investment in Zeta Energy Corp.
– $785,196 (2021: $921,733) of deferred taxes
LIS has total liabilities of $1,025,107 (2021: $443,397) resulting in total net assets of $50,992,716 (2021: $22,750,010).
The underlying driver of these financial results is that the Company has been focused on finalising its research and
development program before progressing further on the pathway to commercialisation.
In accordance with ASX Listing Rule 4.10.19, from the time of the Company’s admission to the ASX on 24 September 2021
until 30 June 2022, the Company has used the cash and assets in a form readily convertible to cash, that it had at the time of
admission, in a way that is consistent with its business objectives at that time.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
LIS was listed on the ASX on 24 September 2021 and commenced trading on 28 September 2021.
During the year, LIS entered into the following important operational agreements:
Supply Agreement with BNNTTL
On 9 July 2021, a supply agreement for the supply of BNNTs, with a purity of at least 95% or otherwise agreed, for the purpose
of using BNNTs in the development, testing and manufacture of the LIS batteries. The key terms of the supply agreement are
as follows:
– LIS may only order from BNNTTL to use BNNTs in the Customer’s development, testing and manufacture of batteries or any
–
other purpose agreed between the parties in writing; and
the initial term of the agreement is 5 years and it automatically renews for further 2 year terms unless LIS elects not to renew
the agreement by giving at least 3 months’ notice prior to the expiry of the latest term.
11
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
Distribution Agreement with BNNTTL
On 9 July 2021, a worldwide exclusive distribution agreement pursuant to which LIS is appointed as distributor for BNNT
products, with a purity of at least 95% or otherwise agreed, within the battery industry, with certain exclusive distribution rights
in respect of lithium-sulphur batteries. The key material terms of the distribution agreement are as follows:
– Li-S Energy may only buy BNNTs from BNNTTL to:
a.
distribute on an exclusive basis BNNTs to third party customers (Customers), provided the Customers are only
permitted to use BNNTs to develop, test or manufacture lithium-sulphur batteries; and
a.
b. distribute on a non-exclusive basis BNNTs to Customers, provided the Customers are only permitted to use BNNTs to:
develop, test or manufacture batteries that are not lithium-sulphur batteries (including to stockpile BNNTs for later
use in accordance with forecasts); and
manufacture nanomesh products incorporating BNNTs (including Li-Nanomesh) for the use in any form or type of
battery;
b.
and any other purpose agreed between the parties in writing.
LIS is not restricted from distributing Li-Nanomesh (or other nanomesh products), or BNNTs to LIS’s customers who have a
licence from LIS to manufacture Li-Nanomesh (or other nanomesh products).
–
the initial term of the agreement is 5 years and it automatically renews for further 2 year terms unless LIS elects not to renew
the agreement by giving at least 3 months’ notice prior to the expiry of the latest term.
Management Services Agreement with PPK Aust P/L
On 9 July 2021, a management services agreement pursuant to which PPK Aust will provide administrative functions such
as accounting, record keeping, reporting, legal, company secretarial support, IT/systems support, etc. It is also appointed, to
the extent permitted by law to facilitate/oversee the funding and capital raising requirements of the company and is paid a
funding fee of up to 1% of any debt or capital raised that it facilitates. PPK Aust will also provide staff to act in key officer roles
including the public officer, chief financial officer and company secretary. The key material terms of the management services
agreement are as follows:
– PPK Aust is paid a fee for providing the management services, which the scope of services to be provided and the fee is
–
reviewed and agreed between the parties every 3 months;
the agreement is for an initial term of 3 years and can be renewed by PPK Aust for a further 3 year term upon notice being
provided by PPK Aust not later than 3 months prior to the expiry of the initial term;
– PPK Aust may terminate the agreement on 30 days’ notice if it is not satisfied with the Annual Plan of LIS; and
– LIS may terminate the agreement at will on 6 months’ notice.
– Li-S Energy indemnifies PPK Aust for any loss that arises from the performance by PPK Aust of its obligations under the
agreement.
Research Framework Agreement with Deakin
On 8 July 2021, a research framework agreement which governs all research projects conducted between LIS and Deakin as
set out in Project Schedules made under the agreement. The key material terms of the research framework agreement are as
follows:
– The parties may from time to time enter into Project Schedules made under the agreement for research projects proposed
and negotiated by the parties. Such Project Schedules include terms around payment, steering committees, specified
personnel of the parties and insurances required; and
– Each party will retain ownership of their respective intellectual property developed prior to the date a Project commences
or is acquired or developed independent of the agreement but grants a non-transferrable licence to the other party to
use such background intellectual property for the purposes of the relevant Project. Any new intellectual property created,
developed or discovered in the conduct of a Project vests in LIS (Project IP) and Deakin is granted a non-exclusive,
perpetual, non-transferable, royalty free licence to use the Project IP for the purposes of the Project and for
non-commercial research, teaching and scholarly pursuits.
Termination of Shareholders Agreement
On 20 July 2021, PPK Aust., Deakin and BNNTTL executed a Deed of Termination of the Shareholders Agreement effective
on the date of signing.
DIVIDENDS
There were no dividends declared or paid during the financial year.
12
Li-S Energy LimitedMATTERS SUBSEQUENT TO THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR
On 14 July 2022, LIS loaned $1,400,000 to PPK Mining Equipment Group for a period of 12 months at 8.0% interest. The loan
is secured against a property in Mt Thorley, NSW which was independently valued at $2,000,000.
There have been no other matter or circumstance that has arisen since the end of the financial period which is not otherwise
dealt with in this report or in the Financial Statements that has significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations
of the Company, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Company in subsequent financial years.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
We have been progressing our business strategy in line with the strategy outlined in our IPO Prospectus and will continue to
refine these as we move forward.
We will continue to engage with a range of additional global OEMs covering the high growth industries in the EV, Aviation and
Drone markets and are pursuing several additional partnerships as our cell technology matures.
We will continue our discussions with battery manufacturers that are currently building or operating gigafactories in Europe
and expect to expand on these as our cell technology continues to mature. Our primary goal moving forward remains to
monetise our IP through licensing, and the ongoing supply of nanomaterials for battery production, in particular, optimising
Li-nanomesh use in lithium-sulphur and lithium metal cells.
We also remain alert for complementary ventures and acquisitions in the battery space that have the potential to deliver
benefits in terms of technology or market access.
OPTIONS AND UNISSUED SHARES
As at the date of this report, there are:
–
–
2,160,000 Service Rights granted to Non-Executive Directors under the NED Equity Plan, of which 720,000 Service Rights
vested during the period but were not exercised, and
1,200,000 Service Rights under the Executive Rights Plan, of which 450,000 Service Rights vested during the period but
were not exercised .
See the Remuneration Report below for further information.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE REPORT
LIS is committed to:
–
–
the effective management of environmental issues having the potential to impact on its business; and
minimising the consumption of resources utilised by its operations.
The Company has otherwise complied with all government legislation and regulations with respect to disposal of waste and
other materials and has not received any notices of breach of environmental laws and/or regulations.
LIS is pleased to set out its inaugural sustainability report.
Visibility of environmental, social and governance metrics is becoming of ever-increasing importance to investors and
stakeholders. LIS welcomes the opportunity to contribute to these discussions and sets out the key measurements against
which it has assessed its performance this financial year. LIS has had particular regard to the UN’s Sustainable Development
Goals framework and envisages that this inaugural report will set the baseline against which further future improvements can
be measured. The following sections on Environmental, Social and Governance describe the progress we have made to date
and what further actions we intend to take in the future.
Environmental
Li-S Energy is headquartered in an office in Brisbane with a small direct environmental footprint. The Company’s current
environmental focus is on minimising energy consumption and non-essential business travel. This is a particular focus as the
Board and senior management are spread across Melbourne, Geelong, Gold Coast and Brisbane.
Lowering climate change and carbon emissions
Ultimately, the core mission of Li-S Energy is to develop and commercialise cutting edge battery technology to assist the
global economy to decarbonise and move to Net Zero.
We are committed to continually reducing our on-premise energy consumption by:
– using cloud technology for our information and platform services where practical;
– using Microsoft Azure as our platform partner and seeking other services we can use from Microsoft. Microsoft has been
carbon neutral since 2012 and is committed to becoming carbon negative by 2030; and
– using office space in a building with a 5-star NABERS (excellent) energy rating for energy, water, waste, and indoor
environment and 5-star green star rating.
13
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
We are committed to reducing emissions associated with our business travel by:
– booking online meetings where practical and possible. Where travel is necessary, we combine meetings and extend the
time away so that more can be achieved to avoid repetitive trips; and
– providing flexibility for our employees to work from home where business needs allow. While this was originally initiated
as part of our COVID-19 response, we have continued the practice which we consider is likely to have had the effect of
reducing carbon emissions from employees commuting to/from the office.
Waste management
We are committed to further improving our recycling methods by:
–
–
–
recycling paper, cardboard, glass, hard plastic, aluminium and tin cans through the services provided by our landlord;
recycling IT equipment and printer cartridges using recycling companies that seek to recycle responsibly; and
re-using IT equipment and parts, where possible.
Deakin University’s Waurn Ponds Campus
LIS seeks to ensure that its important business relationships are with partners that have sustainability plans in place, where
practical. One of LIS’s key relationships is with Deakin University, particularly the Waurn Ponds Campus in Geelong, Victoria
where the laboratory and manufacturing facilities are located.
The campus was established as a ‘living laboratory’ for sustainable development and has a number of commitments to be
achieved by 2025 for procurement and supply, travel and transport, energy and emissions, waste management, water, built
environment and natural environment. For example, Deakin University are working to achieve carbon neutrality with 100%
of its electricity supply coming from renewable sources. All strategic suppliers will also need to meet Deakin’s sustainable
procurement principles.
Social
LIS seeks to attract, employ, and retain people with a diverse background of culture, gender, experience, and age. Our
business model requires people to be agile, curious and roll their sleeves up to work together to get the job done.
Diversity, inclusion, and equality – our objective is to promote equal employment opportunities and increase female
representation across the group, including at the board level.
This year
– Reviewed salary equity for all new hires
– Female representation of 33% of all employees
–
25% women on the board
Thriving people – our objective is to ensure people can perform to their potential and we manage the employee performance
lifecycle
This year
Integration of people risks into the risk management process and reports to board
–
– Flexible working arrangements
Next year
Implement a HR information system to record and manage performance objectives, talent and succession planning
–
– Support staff ongoing development
Strengthen cyber foundations – we acknowledge the cyber threat landscape is ever changing and we have a responsibility to
educate and protect our people, partners and data.
This year
– Renewed focus on our cyber insurance policy
– External cyber penetration test and intelligence report
–
Implemented Mimecast for email phishing protection
– Leveraged Yammer to share cyber insights, examples, hints and tips
Next year
– Deploy new endpoint and cloud protection solutions
–
–
– Work with key third party suppliers on how we share cyber insights and processes
Implement data loss prevention controls
Internal awareness campaign and phishing test
14
Li-S Energy LimitedGovernance
The Company has structured its approach to corporate governance around the principles of ensuring effective contributions
by the Board that adds value.
Risk
LIS identified a number of specific risks in its Prospectus and has made substantial progress to mitigate these risks during the
financial year. In summary:
a. Enhancement of its risk management framework:
–
–
the Board resolved to expand the existing Audit Committee to encompass audit and risk and an updated charter was
made available on the company’s website; and
acquired an internal risk function, pursuant to its management services agreement with PPK, to categorise, manage and
mitigate risks across the Company. As well as the support of the PPK Group COO and Chief Risk Officer, Marc Fenton,
LIS isusing a market leading Software-as-a-Service risk platform aligned to the ISO 31000 framework. The platform
provides a single integrated view of risk with heatmaps, control library and action tracking.
b. Pilot phase research and technology scale up:
–
the appointment of Steve Rowlands, Chief Technology Officer, with 10 years experience in lithium-sulphur battery
research and development provided substantial insights with the scale up plans and valuable introductions into
European companies that operate in this specialty area and have provided expertise and advice.
Evolving technologies:
– meetings by Lee Finniear, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Rowlands, Chief Technology Officer, with international
research companies, battery manufacturers, industry specialists and attendance at international battery conferences
have provided important insights into customer requirements, competitors, general battery technology issues to get a
better understanding of the risks evolving technologies present and what LIS has to do to manage these risks.
continued monitoring of our technology mitigates this risk.
Protection of Intellectual Property
–
Patent protection
–
continued lodgements of new patents in a wide range of countries and developing monitoring tools to manage
infringement.
closer working relationships with Deakin’s scientists and improvements to contractual terms reduces this risk.
Reliance on Research Framework Agreement
–
Reliance on key personnel
– outsourcing agreements with industry specialists for specific development programs and seeking employment of
additional key resources reduces this risk.
Future funding requirements
– obtained up to $5.000 million of federal government funding through the Deakin Trailblazer program over the next four
years and will continue to seek opportunities to participate in future funding programs as appropriate.
Information technology/privacy concerns
–
continue to enhance the LIS technology framework and integrate our requirements with Deakin’s infrastructure.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
LIS continues to identify its risks, develop plans and monitors its actions to mitigate risks and reports regularly to the Audit &
Risk Committee.
Remuneration
LIS is committed to fair and responsible remuneration practices sufficient to attract, retain and motivate suitably qualified
individuals. Dr Finniear has taken considerable care when building out his team to ensure that appropriate remuneration
practices are adopted and that gender pay equity is achieved.
The Chair of LIS is currently designing an appropriate long-term incentive plan for executives, with the current expectation
that this will be put to shareholders at the next annual general meeting. LIS is committed to ensuring that any such long-term
incentives are fair and responsible in nature. The Board of LIS currently expects to create a Remuneration and Nomination
sub-committee when it is appropriate to do so.
Gender equality
LIS has a Diversity Policy that states it ”is committed to an inclusive workplace that embraces and promotes diversity”. A critical
component of this is to promote gender equality.
Since listing in September 2021, 25% of the composition of the Board of four is female. This is slightly below the Company’s
target of 30% (based on our Board charter allowing up to 12 Directors).
As Dr Finniear has built out his team, gender equality has remained a key consideration. Currently, 33% of all employees are
female and this number is also maintained at the senior leadership level.
15
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
Remuneration Report (audited)
The Directors of LIS present the Remuneration Report for Directors and executives, prepared in accordance with the
Corporations Act 2001 and the Corporations Regulations 2001. The Directors have determined that they, Lee Finniear
(Chief Executive Officer), Steve Rowlands (Chief Technology Officer), Glenn Molloy (Chief Strategic Advisor) and
Ken Hostland (Chief Financial Officer) are the key management personnel (“KMP”).
Remuneration Policy
The remuneration policy of the Company has been designed to align directors’ and executives objectives and performance
with shareholder and business results by providing a fixed remuneration component and offering specific Short Term
Incentives (STIs) based on key performance areas affecting the Company’s financial results and Long Term Incentives (LTIs)
based on retention of key people.
The Li-S Board believes the remuneration policy to be appropriate and effective in its ability to attract, retain and motivate
directors and executives of high quality and standard to manage the affairs of the Company and create goal congruence
between directors, executives and shareholders.
The remuneration policy, setting the terms and conditions for directors and executives was developed by the Board.
The policy for determining the nature and amount of remuneration for board members and executives is detailed in the
paragraphs which follow.
Remuneration of non-executive directors is determined by the Board from the maximum amount available for distribution
to the non-executive directors as approved by shareholders. In determining the appropriate level of directors’ fees, data
from surveys undertaken of other public companies similar in size or market section to the Company is taken into account.
Currently this amount is set at $800,000 per annum in aggregate was approved by shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting held in November 2021.
Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)
The following table details the total compensation each Non-Executive Director is entitled to receive in relation to their duties
as a Director of LIS, the Directors do not receive any additional fees for participation on any Committees.
Director
Dr Ben Spincer
Mr Robin Levison
Mr Tony McDonald
Ms Hedy Cray
Directors’ Fees $
(including superannuation)
120,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
Director fees for Ben Spincer include his responsibilities as the Chairman.
LIS has adopted the NED Equity Plan under which the Board of the Company may invite Non-Executive Directors to apply
for Service Rights to be issued in accordance with, and subject to the terms of the Plan. Each Service Right is an entitlement,
upon vesting and exercise, to an ordinary fully paid Share in the Company.
The following table indicates the amount of fees that a NED can sacrifice in return for a grant of Service Rights.
Financial Year
Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)
Fees Sacrifice
($)
Tranche
Number
of Service Rights
2021
2022
2023
Chairman
2021
2022
2023
16
80,000
80,000
80,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
1
2
3
1
2
3
160,000
160,000
160,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
Li-S Energy LimitedNEDs sacrifice total Director fees of $80,000 for 160,000 Service Rights and the Chairman sacrifices total Director fees of
$120,000 for 240,000 Service Rights for each Financial Year. There is no amount payable other than the sacrificed fees for the
Service Rights. The Directors believe that accepting Share Rights in lieu of cash remuneration aligns their risk/reward with that
of the Shareholders.
The number of Service Rights are calculated by dividing the amount of sacrificed fees by the Share price of $0.50 per Share
being the price at which Shares were issued in the April 2021 capital raise. The fair value of these Service Rights at the time
that they were granted have been independently valued at $0.50 each. As the Directors fees are equity instruments settled
in share-based payments, each tranche of service rights are expensed over the vesting period from the date of granting to
the date the last tranche resulting in a proportionally larger expense recognised in the earlier years. Refer to the Short Term
Benefits table disclosed further in this Remuneration Report.
The Service Rights were issued as at 1 May 2021 and vest in three equal tranches on 30 April 2022, 2023 and 2024, providing
the NED holds the office of NED on those dates. Each consecutive tranche commences annually on the vesting date of the
prior tranche. All NEDs met the vesting requirements for Tranche 1.
Service Rights may not be disposed of at any time except by force of law such as on death and Service Rights may not be
exercised prior to vesting but may be exercised at any time once they have vested but must be exercised within 90 days of
cessation of holding the office of NED and any role as an employee of the Company.
Each Service Right has a term ending 15 years after the grant date. If not exercised before the end of their term the Service
Rights will lapse. The term will be reduced if vested Service Rights are not exercised as required following cessation of being a
NED.
If a NED ceases to hold the office of a NED during a tranche then Service Rights for that tranche will vest in proportion to the
time elapsed as served in the tranche. All subsequent tranches will lapse. Any unvested Service Rights that do not vest will
lapse.
A NED must not enter into an arrangement with anyone if it would have the effect of limiting their exposure to risk in relation to
Service Rights (vested or unvested).
If the Board forms the view that a NED has committed an act of fraud, defalcation or gross misconduct in relation to the
Company then all unexercised Service Rights will be forfeited.
Executives
The Board is responsible for approving remuneration policies and packages applicable to executives of the Company.
The broad remuneration policy is to ensure that the remuneration package properly reflects the person’s duties and
responsibilities and that the remuneration is competitive in attracting, retaining and motivating people of high quality and
standard.
A review of the compensation arrangements for executives is conducted by the full Board at a duly constituted Directors’
meeting.
The Board conducts its review annually based on established criteria which includes:
–
–
–
–
the individual’s performance;
reference to market data for broadly comparable positions or skill sets in similar organisations or industry;
the performance of the Company during the relevant period; and
the broad remuneration policy of the Company.
Executives may receive bonuses and/or fees based on the achievement of specific goals of the consolidated entity.
Company Performance and Shareholder Wealth for Executive Remuneration
Statutory performance indicators
Profit/(loss) after income tax expense
Revenue
Share price at period end ($/Share)
Basic earnings per share (c/Share)
Diluted earnings per share (c/Share)
Dividends declared (c/Share)
*
As at 30 June 2021, the Company was not listed.
2022
$
2021
$
(6,271,817)
(1,684,391)
–
0.44
(0.99)
(0.99)
–
–
-*
(0.29)
(0.29)
–
17
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
The two methods employed in achieving this aim are:
Short Term Incentives
LIS has an STI in place which is paid as salary and superannuation above their normal contracts and aligned with key
performance indicators (KPIs) as determined by the board. The KPIs are developed from the strategic and operating plans
and are chosen to reflect the core drivers of short-term performance and deliver sustainable value to the Company, its
shareholders and its customers. The KPIs for this financial year are based on the following metrics:
Core Drivers
Targets
Shareholder Value
Successful ASX listing
Financial
Operational
Research
Deliver cashflow outcome in line with Prospectus
Meet agreed pilot plant timeframe and management recruitment needs
Complete agreed research program
ESG/OH&S/Risk
Develop and enhance ESG, OH&S and risk management
Weighting
20%
30%
30%
10%
10%
Participation in the STI is considered on an annual basis. Cash bonuses for the current year are assessed by the Board after
completion of the financial statement, hence, are nil for this financial year.
Long Term Incentives
LIS has adopted a plan called the LIS Limited Executive Rights Plan (Executive Rights Plan) under which the Board of the
Company may invite certain eligible persons, to apply for Service Rights or Performance Rights to be issued in accordance
with, and subject to the terms of, the Executive Rights Plan. The Executive Rights Plan was approved by shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting held on 24 November 2021.
Each Service Right or Performance Right is an entitlement, upon vesting and exercise, to an ordinary fully paid Share in the
Company.
The Board may at any time by written instrument, or by resolution of the Board, amend or repeal all or any of the provisions of
the Plan. Non-Executive Directors are excluded from Participation in the Plan.
On 12 November 2020 Dr Lee Finniear, Chief Executive Officer, was granted 1,000,000 Service Rights which vest in four
equal tranches on 30 April 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, subject to continuity of his engagement during the Measurement
Periods. The Service Rights at the time that they were granted have been independently valued at $0.065 each and have a nil
exercise price. Each consecutive tranche commences annually on the vesting date of the prior tranche and, if Dr Lee Finniear
ceases his employment during a tranche, then Service Rights for that tranche will vest in proportion to the time elapsed as
served in the tranche and all subsequent tranches will lapse. Dr Lee Finniear met the vesting requirements for Tranche 1.
On 15 June 2022 Dr Steve Rowlands, Chief Technology Officer, was granted 200,000 Service Rights which vest on 30 June
2022 providing he continued to be employed up to and including that date. The Service Rights were valued at $0.425 each,
being the closing share price at the date of the grant and have a nil exercise price. Service Rights that have vested may be
exercised any time after 30 June 2024. Dr Steve Rowlands met the vesting requirements for this Tranche.
The Service Rights may not be disposed of at any time except by force of law such as on death and Service Rights may not be
exercised prior to vesting but may be exercised at any time once they have vested but must be exercised within 90 days of
cessation of being an employee of the Company.
Each Service Right has a term ending 15 years after the grant date. If not exercised before the end of their term the Service
Rights will lapse. The term will be reduced if vested Service Rights are not exercised as required following cessation of being an
employee of the Company.
Any unvested Service Rights that do not vest will lapse.
Participants of the Executive Rights Plan must not enter into an arrangement with anyone if it would have the effect of
limiting his exposure to risk in relation to Service Rights (vested or unvested). If the Board forms the view that a Participant has
committed an act of fraud, defalcation or gross misconduct in relation to the Company then all unexercised Service Rights will
be forfeited.
18
Li-S Energy LimitedRemuneration Details for the year ended 30 June 2022 for the KMP
Details of the nature and amount of each element of remuneration of each KMP of LIS are shown in the table below:
Short Term Benefits
Salary &
Fees
($)
Cash Bonus(2)
($)
Non-
Monetary
($)
Post
employ-
ment
Super-
annuation
($)
Long Term
Benefits
($)
Termination
Payments
($)
Share
Based
Payments(1)
($)
Performance
Related
%
Total
($)
2022
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
Total Directors
Other KMP
-
-
-
-
-
L Finniear
276,432
S Rowlands(3)
201,659
G Molloy(4)
196,000
K Hostland(5)
-
Total Other
Total KMP
674,091
674,091
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 23,568
-
-
-
-
-
6,261
-
-
29,829
29,829
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
235,681
235,681
157,122
157,122
157,122
157,122
157,122
157,122
707,047
707,047
28,610
328,610
85,000
292,920
-
-
196,000
-
113,610
817,530
820,657 1,524,577
-
-
-
-
-
9
29
-
-
14
0
(1)
Equity settled share based payments. Each tranche of the service rights granted are expensed over the vesting period from the date of granting
to the date that the last tranche vests resulting in a proportionally larger expense recognised in the earlier years. Share based payments for
directors are not performance related but are in lieu of salary and fees.
S Rowlands was remunerated as a citizen of the UK for part of the financial year.
(2) Cash bonuses for the current year are assessed by the Board after completion of the financial statements, hence, are nil for this financial year.
(3)
(4) Remunerated through a consulting agreement on 12 June 2021 at an agreed hourly rate for w ork undertaken on behalf of LIS.
(5) Remunerated by PPK Group Limited.
19
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
Short Term Benefits
Salary &
Fees
($)
Cash Bonus(3)
($)
Non-
Monetary
($)
Post
employ-
ment
Super-
annuation
($)
Long Term
Benefits
($)
Termination
Payments
($)
Share
Based
Payments(1)
($)
Performance
Related
%
Total
($)
2021
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
–
-
R Levison(2)
16,667
100,000
A McDonald(2)
16,667
200,000
H Cray
G Pullen
Total Non-
Executive
Executive
-
-
-
-
33,334
300,000
G Molloy(2)
16,667
400,000
Total Executive
16,667
400,000
Total Directors
50,001
700,000
Other KMP
L Finniear(2)(4)
98,100
100,000
K Hostland
M Winfield
G Walsh
-
-
-
100,000
50,000
50,000
Total Other
98,100
300,000
Total KMP
148,101
1,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
36,668
36,668
24,444
141,111
24,444
241,111
24,444
24,444
-
-
110,000
443,334
-
-
416,667
416,667
110,000
860,001
17,058
215,158
-
-
-
100,000
50,000
50,000
17,058
415,158
127,058
1,275,159
71
83
96
46
100
100
100
(1)
(2)
(3)
Equity settled share based payments. Each tranche of the service rights granted are expensed over the vesting period from the date of granting
to the date that the last tranche vests resulting in a proportionally larger expense recognised in the earlier years.
Salary & Fees include directors fees paid from 1 July 2020 to 30 April 2021 and consulting fees paid from 14 February 2021 to 30 June 2021.
Cash bonus was paid for work undertaken in relation to the Li-S Energy IPO and was above normal work responsibilities. Bonuses were invested
in shares in Li-S Energy in off-market-transfers at $0.50 per share.
(4) Cash bonus was in relation to a sign-on fee for leaving his previous place of employment.
Employment Contracts with Key Management Personnel
Dr Lee Finniear (Chief Executive Officer)
Term: Commencing 1 July 2021 with no fixed term.
Remuneration: Base remuneration of $300,000, inclusive of superannuation. He also participates in the Company’s short
term incentive plan for the 2022 Financial Year up to $100,000 and will receive 1,000,000 Service Rights vesting over a four
year term in accordance with the Executive Rights Plan.
Other terms and conditions: Includes standard terms and conditions for agreements of this nature, including confidentiality,
restraint on competition and retention of intellectual property provisions.
Termination: The agreement may be terminated at any time by either party giving 6 months written notice or immediately due
to serious misconduct or any reason entitling the LIS to summarily dismiss him at common law.
20
Li-S Energy LimitedDr Steve Rowlands (Chief Technology Officer)
Term: Commencing 1 July 2021 with no fixed term.
Remuneration: Base remuneration of $176,000, inclusive of superannuation, was changed to a base remuneration of
$200,000 plus super effective 15 December 2021. He also participates in the Company’s short term incentive plan for the
2022 Financial Year up to 30% of his base salary and received 200,000 Service Rights which vested on 30 June 2022 in
accordance with the Executive Rights Plan.
Other terms and conditions: Includes standard terms and conditions for agreements of this nature, including confidentiality,
restraint on competition and retention of intellectual property provisions.
Termination: The agreement may be terminated at any time by either party giving 6 months written notice or immediately due
to serious misconduct or any reason entitling the LIS to summarily dismiss him at common law.
Consulting Agreements
Glenn Molloy (Chief Strategic Officer)
Term: Commencing 12 June 2021 for a period of 24 months unless terminated earlier by LIS as permitted under the agreement
Remuneration: A daily rate as agreed between the parties reflective of work commitment and strategy.
Other terms and conditions: Includes standard terms and conditions for agreements of this nature, including confidentiality,
restraint on competition and retention of intellectual property provisions.
The number of ordinary shares in LIS held by each KMP for the year ended 30 June 2022 is set out below:
2022
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
Total Directors
Other KMP
L Finniear
S Rowlands
G Molloy(1)
K Hostland
Total Other
Total KMP
(1)
Entered into a consulting agreement on 12 June 2021.
Share
Balance at
Start of Year
Shares
Acquired
Shares Sold
Share
Balance at
End of Year
200,000
-
2,776,917
13,632
866,961
-
27,201
140,750
3,871,079
154,382
200,000
-
6,440,784
504,295
7,145,079
-
-
-
24,771
24,771
11,016,158
179,153
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
200,000
2,790,549
866,961
167,951
4,025,461
200,000
-
6,440,784
529,066
7,169,850
11,195,311
21
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
2021
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
Total Non-Executive
Executive
G Molloy(1)
Total Executive
Total Directors
Other KMP
L Finniear
Total Other
Total KMP
Share
Balance at
Start of
Year
Shares Issued
via
PPK’s In-
specie
Dividend
Shares
Acquired
Shares
Sold
Share
Balance at
End of Year
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
200,000
1,576,917
1,200,000
166,961
700,000
-
27,201
1,743,878
2,127,201
5,640,784
800,000
5,640,784
800,000
7,384,662
2,927,201
-
-
200,000
200,000
7,384,662
3,127,201
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
200,000
2,776,917
866,961
27,201
3,871,079
6,440,784
6,440,784
10,311,863
200,000
200,000
10,511,863
(1)
Resigned as a Director on 11 June 2021.
As at the end of the financial year, the number of service rights in LIS held by each KMP for the year ended 30 June 2022 is set out below:
Balance at
Start of
Year(1)
Granted
During the
Year
Vested
Exercised Forfeited
Vested &
Unexercised
Balance at End of Year
Unvested
2022
Unvested
Unvested
No
%
No
No
%
No
No
Maximum $
Value to
Vest(2)
Directors
B Spincer
R Levison
720,000
480,000
A McDonald
480,000
H Cray
480,000
Total Directors 2,160,000
Other KMP
L Finniear
1,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
240,000 100%
160,000 100%
160,000 100%
160,000 100%
720,000
250,000 100%
S Rowlands
- 200,000 200,000 100%
Total Other
1,000,000 200,000 450,000
Total KMP
3,160,000 200,000 1,170,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 240,000 480,000
70,200
-
-
-
-
160,000 320,000
64,251
160,000 320,000
64,251
160,000 320,000
64,251
720,000 1,440,000
262,953
- 250,000 750,000
19,333
- 200,000
-
-
- 450,000 750,000
19,333
- 1,170,000 2,190,000
282,286
(1)
(2)
There were nil vested and unexercised rights at the beginning of the year.
The maximum value of service rights to vest has been calculated as the amount of the grant date fair value of the service rights yet to be
expensed.
22
Li-S Energy LimitedBalance at
Start of
Year
Granted
During the
Year
Vested
Exercised Forfeited
Vested &
Unexercised
Balance at End of Year
Unvested
2021
Vested
Unvested
No
%
No
No
%
No
No
Maximum $
Value to
Vest(1)
Directors
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
-
-
-
-
720,000
480,000
480,000
480,000
Total Directors
- 2,160,000
Other KMP
L Finniear
Total Other
Total KMP
- 1,000,000
- 1,000,000
- 3,160,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
720,000 360,000
480,000 240,000
480,000 240,000
480,000 240,000
- 2,160,000 1,080,000
- 1,000,000
65,000
- 1,000,000
65,000
- 3,160,000 1,145,000
(1)
The maximum value of service rights to vest has been calculated as the amount of the grant date fair value of the service rights yet to be
expensed.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES OF THE COMPANY
There were no other transactions with directors and/or their related parties during the year.
(End of the Remuneration Report)
23
Annual Report 2022Directors’ Report
continued
DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
The number of meetings of Directors held during the year and the number of meetings attended by each Director is as follows:
Ben Spincer
Robin Levison
Anthony McDonald
Hedy Cray
Directors’ Meetings
Audit & Risk Committee
Meetings
Number
Eligible to
Attend
Number
Attended
Number
Eligible to
Attend
Number
Attended
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
Under ASX Listing Rules, the Company is required to disclose in its Annual Report the extent of its compliance with the
ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations
(“ASX Recommendations”). The ASX Recommendations largely adopt an ‘if not, why not’ approach.
LIS’s directors and management are committed to conducting business ethically and in accordance with high standards of
corporate governance. A copy of LIS’s 2022 Corporate Governance Statement can be found in the corporate governance
section of LIS’s website at www.lis.energy.
RISK & CONTROL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
In accordance with the Recommendations, the Board has:
–
–
received and considered reports from management regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s management of its
material business risks; and
received assurance from the people performing each of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer functions
regarding the consolidated financial statements and the effective operation of risk management systems and internal
controls in relation to financial reporting risks.
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE
The details of the composition, role and Charter of the LIS’s Audit and Risk Committee are available on the Company’s website
at www.lis.energy.
During the reporting period, the Li-S Energy Audit Committee consisted of the following:
Hedy Cray
Robin Levison
Anthony McDonald
Non-Executive Independent Director, Chairperson
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Independent Director
The Company’s lead signing and review External Audit Partner, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and selected consultants attend meetings of the Audit Committee by standing invitation.
PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF COMPANY
No person has applied for leave of the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings
on behalf of the Company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Company is a party, for the purpose of taking
responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or any part of those proceedings.
DIRECTORS’ INDEMNIFICATION
During or since the end of the financial year the company has given an indemnity or entered an agreement to indemnify, or
paid or agreed to pay insurance premiums as follows:
Each of the Directors and the Company Secretary of LIS have entered into a deed whereby the company has provided certain
contractual rights of access to books and records of LIS to those Directors and the Company Secretary. The company has
insured all its Directors and Executive Officers. The contract of insurance prohibits the disclosure of the nature of the liabilities
covered and amount of the premium paid. The Corporations Act 2001 does not require disclosure of the information in these
circumstances.
24
Li-S Energy Limited
AUDITOR’S INDEMNIFICATION
To the extent permitted by law, the Company has agreed to indemnify its auditors, Ernst & Young Australia, as part of the
terms of its audit engagement agreement against claims by third parties arising from the audit (for an unspecified amount).
No payment has been made to indemnify Ernst & Young during or since the financial year.
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
Non-audit services provided by the Company’s auditor, Ernst & Young, in the current financial period and prior financial year
included preparation of an Independent Limited Assurance Report in relation to the IPO, taxation advice and other advisory
services. The Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of
independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The nature and scope of each type of non-audit service
provided means that auditor independence was not compromised.
During the year, the following fees were paid or payable for non-audit services provided by the auditor of the company and its
related practices:
Independent Limited Assurance Report in relation to IPO
Taxation advice and other advisory services
Total remuneration
2022
$
43,350
28,500
71,850
2021
$
69,950
5,000
74,950
ROUNDING OF ACCOUNTS
The amounts contained in the financial report have been rounded to the nearest dollar (where rounding is applicable) under
the option available to the Company under ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports) Instrument
2016/191. The Company is an entity to which this legislative instrument applies.
AUDITORS INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
A copy of the Auditor’s Independence Declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for the
year ended 30 June 2022 and a copy of this declaration forms part of this Directors’ Report.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors:
Ben Spincer
Chairman
Brisbane,
18 August 2022
Robin Levison
Non-Executive Independent Director
25
Annual Report 2022
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Ernst & Young
111 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia
GPO Box 7878 Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel: +61 7 3011 3333
Fax: +61 7 3011 3100
ey.com/au
Auditor’s independence declaration to the directors of Li-S Energy
Limited
As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of Li-S Energy Limited for the financial year ended
30 June 2022, I declare to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
a. No contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in
relation to the audit;
b. No contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit; and
c. No non-audit services provided that contravene any applicable code of professional conduct in
relation to the audit.
Ernst & Young
Brad Tozer
Partner
18 August 2022
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
27
26
Li-S Energy Limited
Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 30 June 2022
Revenue from contracts with customers
Finance income
Rental income
Notes
2022
$
–
42,374
47,924
Employee benefits expenses
13.1
(406,916)
2021
$
–
–
–
–
IPO expenses
Professional costs
Audit fees
Management fees
Directors’ fees
Share based payments expense
Administration expenses
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Finance costs
Unrealised gain (loss) on investment at FVTPL
PROFIT (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Income tax (expense) benefit
PROFIT (LOSS) AFTER INCOME TAX EXPENSE
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) NET OF INCOME TAX
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) FOR THE YEAR
Earnings per share (in cents)
Basic
Diluted
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
(2,382,161)
(1,193,104)
(813,630)
(218,042)
6
(78,050)
(41,000)
25.2
(600,000)
(200,000)
–
(50,000)
25.1
(820,657)
(127,058)
(1,272,316)
(108,793)
14.1
(231,638)
(54,604)
4
12
5
24
24
(8,483)
(1,160)
251,736
(289,638)
(6,271,817)
(2,283,399)
–
599,008
(6,271,817)
(1,684,391)
–
–
(6,271,817)
(1,684,391)
(0.99)
(0.99)
(0.29)
(0.29)
27
Annual Report 2022Statement of Financial Position
as at 30 June 2022
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Other current assets
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Investments
Property, plant & equipment
Right-of-use assets
Intangible assets
Deferred tax assets
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Lease liabilities
Provisions
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Lease liabilities
Provisions
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Reserves
Retained earnings (accumulated losses)
Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Li-S Energy Limited
TOTAL EQUITY
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
28
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
5
16
17
18
17
18
43,853,377
18,606,698
156,877
84,234
226,143
68,135
44,094,488
18,900,976
2,509,798
2,258,062
1,091,554
120,773
218,824
3,317,963
785,196
–
991,863
921,733
7,923,335
4,292,431
52,017,823
23,193,407
743,492
443,397
101,309
44,326
889,127
–
–
443,397
95,980
40,000
135,980
–
–
–
1,025,107
443,397
50,992,716
22,750,010
19.1
20
56,688,707
22,994,841
2,295,365
1,474,708
(7,991,356)
(1,719,539)
50,992,716
22,750,010
50,992,716
22,750,010
Li-S Energy LimitedStatement of Cash Flows
for the year ended 30 June 2022
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash payments to suppliers and employees
Cash payments for IPO related costs
Cash payments for management fees paid to parent entity
Cash receipts from BAS refunds
Cash receipts from rental income
Interest received
Interest paid
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Payments for development expenditure and intangibles
Payments for purchases of property, plant & equipment
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repayment of lease liabilities
Repayment of borrowings – related parties
Proceeds from capital raisings
Transaction costs on issue of shares
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash held
Cash at the beginning of the financial year
Cash at the end of the financial year
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
(3,039,346)
(462,309)
(2,382,161)
(941,820)
(680,000)
(120,000)
645,246
47,924
42,374
–
–
–
4.1
4
(8,483)
(1,216)
(5,374,446)
(1,525,345)
(2,045,979)
(563,783)
(1,035,722)
(133,906)
(3,081,701)
(697,689)
(127,578)
–
–
(1,185,118)
34,000,001 20,000,000
(169,597)
(1,021,250)
33,702,826
17,793,632
25,246,679
15,570,598
18,606,698
3,036,100
43,853,377
18,606,698
19.2
19.2
4.2
9
29
Annual Report 2022Statement of Changes in Equity
for the year ended 30 June 2022
ENTITY
At 1 July 2021
Total comprehensive income (loss)
for the year
Profit (loss) for the year
Other comprehensive income (loss)
for the year
Total comprehensive income (loss)
for the year
Issue of share capital on initial public
offering
Issue of service rights for
Non-Executive Directors
Issue of service rights for Executives
Transaction costs for issue of share
capital
Tax effect of transaction costs on
issue of share capital deductible over
five years
Contributed
Equity
$
Notes
Share
Premium
Reserve
$
Share
Options
Reserve
$
Accumulated
Losses
$
Total Equity
$
22,994,841
1,347,650
127,058
(1,719,539) 22,750,010
–
–
–
19.2 34,000,001
20.1
20.1
–
–
19.2
(169,597)
19.2
(136,538)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
707,047
113,610
–
–
(6,271,817)
(6,271,817)
–
–
(6,271,817)
(6,271,817)
– 34,000,001
–
–
–
–
707,047
113,610
(169,597)
(136,538)
At 30 June 2022
56,688,707
1,347,650
947,715
(7,991,356) 50,992,716
30
Li-S Energy LimitedStatement of Changes in Equity
for the year ended 30 June 2021
Contributed
Equity
$
Notes
Share
Premium
Reserve
$
Share
Options
Reserve
$
Equity
Reserve
$
Accumulated
Losses
$
Total Equity
$
663,366
1,347,650
-
3,030,000
(35,148)
5,005,868
-
-
-
23,250,000
20.1
20.1
-
-
(918,525)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,684,391)
(1,684,391)
-
-
(1,684,391)
(1,684,391)
(3,250,000)
- 20,000,000
110,000
17,058
-
-
-
220,000
-
-
-
110,000
17,058
(698,525)
ENTITY
At 1 July 2020
Total comprehensive
income (loss) for the year
Profit (loss) for the year
Other comprehensive
income (loss) for the year
Total comprehensive
income (loss) for the year
Issue of share capital on
private placement
Issue of service rights for
Non-Executive Directors
Issue of service rights for
Executives
Transaction costs for issue
of share capital
At 30 June 2021
22,994,841
1,347,650
127,058
-
(1,719,539) 22,750,010
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
31
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
Corporate information
1
The financial statements of Li-S Energy Limited (“Li-S Energy” or “LIS” or “the Company”) for the year ended 30 June 2022 were
authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 18 August 2022 as required by the Corporations Act 2001.
LIS is a for-profit public company limited by shares, incorporated and domiciled in Australia. LIS is registered in Queensland
and has its head office at Level 27, 10 Eagle Street, Brisbane, Queensland 4000.
Li-S Energy Limited was incorporated on 12 July 2019 as one of the initial application projects identified in the Joint Venture
Research Agreement with Deakin University and announced by PPK Group Limited on 16 October 2019. The principal
activity of LIS is to develop and commercialise a new type of battery based on Lithium-sulphur (Li-S) and using boron nitride
nanotubes (BNNT) as both an integrated protective insulation layer and a component in composite anodes which will allow
faster charging rates and increased battery cycle life.
2
Summary of significant accounting policies
2.1 Basis of preparation and statement of compliance
These general purpose financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the Corporations Act 2001, Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian
Accounting Standards Board. Compliance with Australian Accounting Standards results in full compliance with the
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
The Financial Information has been prepared on an accruals basis and are based on historical costs, except for investments
measured at fair value.
The accounting policies have been consistently applied unless otherwise stated.
2.2 New and revised standards that are effective for these financial statements
There were no first time standards and amendments effective for the financial period ended 30 June 2022 that are material to
the Company. The Company has not early adopted any other standard, interpretation or amendment that has been issued but
is not yet effective.
AASB 2020-3 Amendments to AASB 3 – Reference to the Conceptual Framework
When the revised Conceptual Framework was issued in 2018, its application to AASB 3 was excluded requiring entities to
apply the definitions of an asset and liability (and supporting concepts) in the previous Framework. In some cases, the revised
definitions might change which assets and liabilities qualify for recognition in a business combination. As a consequence,
post-acquisition accounting required by other standards could lead to immediate derecognition or such assets or liabilities,
causing “day 2 gains or losses” to arise, which did not depict economic reality.
The IASB has assessed the impact of the revised definitions of assets and liabilities in the Conceptual Framework to business
combinations, concluding that the problem of day 2 gains or losses would be significant only for liabilities that an acquirer
accounts for after acquisition by applying IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets or IFRIC 21 Levies.
The IASB updated IFRS 3 in May 2020 for the revised definitions of an asset and liability and excluded the application of the
Conceptual Framework to liabilities and contingent liabilities within the scope of IAS 37 or IFRIC 21. The AASB released the
equivalent amendments to AASB 3 in June 2020. When the amendments are first adopted for the year ended 30 June 2023,
the amendments are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
IAS 16 Amendment to Property, Plant and Equipment: Proceeds before Intended Use
The amendment prohibits entities from deducting from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment, any proceeds
of the sale of items produced while bringing that asset to location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating
in the manner intended by management. Instead, an entity recognises the proceeds from selling such items, and the costs of
producing those items, in profit or loss. An entity applies this amendment for annual reporting periods beginning on or after
1 July 2022 and the amendment is applied retrospectively but only to items of property, plant and equipment that are “ready to
use” from the date of application. When this amendment is first adopted for the year ended 30 June 2023, the amendment is
not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
AASB 2021-2 Amendments to AASB 7, AASB 101, AASB 134 Interim Financial Reporting and AASB Practice
Statement 2 Making Materiality Judgements – Disclosure of Accounting Policies
The amendments to AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements require disclosure of “material” accounting policy
information, instead of “significant” accounting policies. Unlike material, significant is not defined in Australian Accounting
Standards and leveraging the existing definition of material, with additional guidance, is expected to help preparers make
more effective accounting policy disclosures. The guidance illustrates circumstances where an entity is likely to consider
accounting policy information to be material and entity-specific accounting policy information is emphasised as being more
useful than generic information or summaries of the requirements of Australian Accounting Standards. The amendments to
AASB Practice Statement 2 supplement the amendments to AASB 101 by illustrating how the four-step materiality process
can identify material accounting policy information. When the amendment is first adopted for the year ended 30 June 2024,
the amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
32
Li-S Energy Limited2
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
AASB 2021-2 Amendments to AASB 108 – Definition of Accounting Estimates
An accounting policy may require items in the financial statements to be measured using information that is either directly
observable or estimated. Accounting estimates use inputs and measurement techniques that require judgement and
assumptions based on the latest available reliable information. The amendments to AASB 108 clarify definition of an
accounting estimate, making it easier to differentiate it from an accounting policy. The distinction if necessary as their
treatment and disclosure requirements are different. Critically, a change of an accounting estimate is applied prospectively
whereas a change in accounting policy is applied retrospectively.
The new definition provides that “Accounting estimates are monetary amounts in financial statements that are subject to
measurement uncertainty”. The amendments explain that a change in an input or a measurement technique used to develop
an accounting estimate is considered a change in an accounting estimate unless it is correcting a prior period error. When the
amendments are first adopted for the year ended 30 June 2024, the amendments are not expected to have a material impact
on the financial statements.
AASB 2021-5 Amendments to AAS – Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single
Transaction
The amendment requires entities to account for income tax consequences when economic transactions take place, rather
than when income tax payments or recoveries are made. Accounting for such tax consequences means entities need to
consider the differences between tax rules and accounting standards. Deferred taxes representing amounts of income tax
payable or recoverable must be recognised on temporary differences unless specifically prohibited by AASB 112. An entity
applies this amendment for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2023 and applies the amendment from the
beginning of the earliest comparative period presented for all transactions occurring on or after that date and for deferred tax
balances arising from leases and decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities existing at that date. The cumulative effect
of initial application is recognised as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or other component of equity,
as appropriate. When the amendment is first adopted for the year ended 30 June 2024, the amendment is not expected to
have a material impact on the financial statements.
AASB 2020 – Amendments to AASs – Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current
A liability is classified as current if the entity has no right at the end of the reporting period to defer settlement for at least
12 months after the reporting period. The AASB recently issued amendments to AASB 101 to clarify the requirements for
classifying liabilities as current or non-current, specifically:
–
the amendments specify that the conditions which exist at the end of the reporting period are those which will be used to
determine if a right to defer settlement exists.
– management intention or expectation does not affect the classification of liabilities.
–
in cases where an instrument with a conversion option is classified as a liability, the transfer of equity instruments would
constitute settlement of the liability for the purpose of classifying it as current or non-current.
A consequence of the first amendment is that a liability would be classified as current if its repayment conditions failed their
test at reporting date, despite those conditions only becoming effective in the 12 months after the end of the reporting period.
The AASB has proposed further amendments:
–
–
–
specifying that conditions with which an entity must comply after the reporting period do not affect the classification at the
reporting date;
adding presentation and disclosure requirements for non-current liabilities subject to conditions in the next 12 months;
clarifying specific situations in which an entity does not have a right to defer settlement for at least 12 months after the
reporting date; and
– deferring the effective date of the original amendments to no earlier than 1 July 2024.
The amendments are applied retrospectively and early adoption is permitted. When the amendments are first adopted for the
year ended 30 June 2025 or earlier, the amendments are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
AASB 1014-10 Amendments to AAS – Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint
Venture
The amendments address a current inconsistency between AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements and AASB 128
Investments in Associates or Joint Ventures. The amendments clarify that, on a sale or contribution of assets to a joint venture
or associate or on loss of control or significant influence is retained in a transaction involving an associate or joint venture,
any gain or loss recognised will depend on whether the assets or subsidiary constitutes a business, whereas gain or loss
attributable to other investors’ interests is recognised when the assets or subsidiary do not constitute a business.
33
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
2
This amendment effectively introduces an exception to the general requirement in AASB 10 to recognise full gain or loss on
the loss of control over a subsidiary. The exception only applies to the loss of control over a subsidiary that does not contain a
business, if the loss of control is the result of a transaction involve an associate or a joint venture that is accounted for using the
equity method. Corresponding amendments have also been made to AASB 128.
When the amendments are first adopted for the year ended 30 June 2026, the amendments are not expected to have a
material impact on the financial statements.
2.3 Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency
The functional and presentation currency of the Company is in Australian Dollars ($AUD).
Foreign currency transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions during the period are converted to Australian currency at rates of exchange applicable at the
dates of the transactions (spot exchange rate). Foreign exchange gains and losses, whether realised or unrealised, resulting
from the settlement of such transactions, amounts receivable and payable in foreign currency at the reporting date, and from
the re-measurement of monetary items at year end exchange rates are recognised in profit or loss.
Non-monetary items are not retranslated at year end and are measured at historical cost (translated using the exchange rate
at the date of the transaction), except for non-monetary items measured at fair value which are translated using the exchange
rates at the date when fair value was determined.
2.4 Operating expenses
Operating expenses are recognised in the profit or loss upon utilisation of the services or at the date incurred.
2.5 Finance costs
All borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalised
during the period that is necessary to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use or sale. Other finance and
borrowing costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred and reported in finance costs.
2.6 Cash and cash equivalents
For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash includes cash on hand, and at call deposits with banks or financial
institutions, net of bank overdrafts as they are considered an integral part of the Company’s cash management.
2.7 Trade receivables
The Company makes use of a simplified approach in accounting for trade receivables and records the loss allowance at the
amount equal to the expected lifetime credit losses. The Company uses its historical experience, external indicators and
forward-looking information to calculate the expected credit losses using a provision matrix which is based on the historical
credit loss experience for the customer segments. At every reporting date, the historical credit loss experience is reviewed
and updated, if appropriate, and changes in the forward-looking estimates are analysed. For this financial year, the Company
did not have any expected lifetime credit losses.
2.8 Property, plant and equipment
Plant and equipment are brought to account at cost less, where applicable, any accumulated depreciation and impairment.
The cost of fixed assets constructed includes the cost of materials used in construction, direct labour and an appropriate
proportion of fixed and variable overheads.
The depreciable amount of all fixed assets, including buildings and capitalised leased assets but excluding freehold land, is
depreciated over their useful lives commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. Leasehold improvements are
amortised over the shorter of either the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
The gain or loss on disposal of all fixed assets is determined as the difference between the carrying amount of the asset at the
time of disposal and the proceeds of disposal, and is included in the profit and loss of the entity in the year of disposal.
The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable assets are:
Class of Fixed Asset
Leasehold Improvements
Plant & Equipment
34
Depreciation Rate
Straight Line
Over the term of the lease
10% – 33%
Li-S Energy Limited2
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
2.9
Intangible assets
Research and Development
Research is recognised as an expense as incurred. Costs incurred on development (relating to the design and testing of
new or improved products) are recognised as intangible assets when it is probable that the project will, after considering its
commercial and technical feasibility, be completed and generate future economic benefits and its costs can be measured
reliably. The expenditure capitalised comprises all directly attributable costs, including costs of materials, services, direct
labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Other development expenditures that do not meet these criteria such
as a) selling, administrative and other general overhead expenditure, unless this expenditure can be directly attributed to
preparing the asset for use; b) identified inefficiencies and initial operating losses incurred before the asset achieves planned
performance; and c) expenditure on training staff to operate the asset, are recognised as an expense as incurred.
Development costs previously recognised as an expense are not recognised as an asset in a subsequent period. Capitalised
development costs are recorded as intangible assets at cost less any accumulated amortisation and impairment losses and
amortised over the period of expected future sales from the related projects. The carrying value of development costs is
reviewed annually when the asset is not yet ready for use, or when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value
may be impaired.
Intangible assets not yet ready for use require an annual impairment test. Management has used significant judgement to
determine there was no impairment that occurred after the initial recognition of the intangible asset.
2.10 Financial instruments
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial assets
i)
Financial assets are classified, at initial recognition, as subsequently measured at amortised cost, fair value through other
comprehensive income (OCI), and fair value through profit or loss.
Financial assets are classified according to the characteristics of their contractual cash flow and the Company’s business
model for managing them. Except for those trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component or for
which the Company has applied the practical expedient, the Company initially measures a financial asset at its fair value plus,
in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs. Trade receivables that do contain a
significant financing component for which the Company has applied the practical expedient are measured at the transaction
price.
Fair value
Estimated discounted cash flows were used to measure fair value, except for fair values of financial assets that were traded in
active markets that are based on quoted market prices.
Hierarchy
The following tables classify financial instruments recognised in the statement of financial position of the Company according
to the hierarchy stipulated in AASB13 as follows:
– Level 1 – the instrument has quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
– Level 2 – a valuation technique is used using inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for financial
instruments, either directly (i.e. as prices), or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); or
– Level 3 – a valuation technique is used using inputs that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs)
The Company’s investment in Zeta Energy LLC is at fair value through profit and loss and is measured as a Level 3 financial
instrument.
Financial assets are classified according to the characteristics of their contractual cash flow and the Company’s business
model for managing them. Except for those trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component or for
which the Company has applied the practical expedient, the Company initially measures a financial asset at its fair value plus,
in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs. Trade receivables that do contain a
significant financing component for which the Company has applied the practical expedient are measured at the transaction
price as disclosed in Note 2.7.
For a financial asset to be classified and measured at amortised cost or fair value through OCI, it needs to give rise to cash
flows that are “solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI)” on the principal amount outstanding. This assessment is
referred to as the SPPI test and is performed at an instrument level. Financial assets with cash flows that are not SPPI are
classified and measured at fair value through profit and loss (“FVTPL)”, irrespective of the business model.
35
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
2
The Company’s business model for managing financial assets refers to how it manages its financial assets in order to generate
cash flows. The business model determines whether cash flows will result from collecting contractual cash flows, selling the
financial assets, or both. Financial assets classified and measured at amortised cost are held within a business model with the
objective to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows while financial assets classified and measured at fair
value through OCI are held within a business model with the objective of holding to collect contractual cash flows and selling.
Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within a time frame established by regulation or convention
in the marketplace (regular way trades) are recognised on the trade date (ie the date that the Company commits to purchase
or sell the asset).
Subsequent measurement
For purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories:
– Financial assets at amortised cost (debt instruments)
– Financial assets at fair value through OCI with recycling of cumulative gains and losses (debt instruments)
– Financial assets designated at fair value through the OCI with no recycling of cumulative gains or losses upon derecognition
(equity instruments)
– Financial assets at FVTPL
Financial assets at amortised cost (debt instruments)
Financial assets at amortised cost are subsequently measured using the effective interest (EIR) method and are subject to
impairment. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.
Financial assets fair value through OCI (debt instruments)
For debt instruments at fair value through OCI, interest income, impairment losses or reversals are recognised in the
statement of profit and loss and computed in the same manner as for financial assets measured at amortised cost.
The remaining fair value changes are recognised in OCI. Upon derecognition the cumulative fair value change recognised in
OCI is recycled to profit or loss.
The Company has no debt instruments at fair value through OCI.
Financial assets designated at fair value through OCI (equity instruments)
Upon initial recognition, the Company can elect to classify irrevocably its equity investments as equity instruments
designated at fair value though OCI when they meet the definition of equity under AASB 32 Financial Instruments:
Presentation and are not held for trading. The classification is determined on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
Gains and losses on these financial assets are never recycled to profit or loss. Dividends are recognised as other income in
the statement of profit or loss when the right of payment has been established, except when the Company benefits from
such proceeds as a recovery of part of the cost of the financial asset, in which case, such gains are recorded in OCI. Equity
instruments designated at fair value through OCI are not subject to impairment assessment.
The Company has no equity instruments at fair value through OCI.
Financial assets at FVTPL
Financial assets at FVTPL are carried in the statement of financial position at fair value with net changes in fair value
recognised in the statement of profit and loss.
This category includes derivative instruments and listed equity investments which the Company had not irrevocably elected
to classify at fair value through OCI. Dividends on listed equity investments are recognised as other income in the statement
of profit or loss when the right of payment has been established.
Derecognition
A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group similar financial assets) is primarily
derecognised (ie removed from the Company’s statement of financial position) when:
– The rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; or
– The Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay the received
cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a “pass-through” arrangement, and either (a) the Company
has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) the Company has neither transferred nor retained
substantially all of the risks and rewards of the asset but has transferred control of the asset.
When the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset or has entered into a “pass-through”
arrangement, it evaluates if, and to what extent, it has retained the risks and rewards of ownership. When it has neither
transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, nor transferred control of the asset, the Company
continues to recognise the transferred asset to the extent of its continuing involvement. In that case, the Company also
recognises an associated liability. The transferred asset and the associated liability are measured on a basis that reflects the
rights and obligations that the Company has retained.
36
Li-S Energy LimitedSummary of significant accounting policies (continued)
2
Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee over the transferred asset is measured at the lower of the original
carrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of consideration that the Company could be required to repay.
Financial liabilities
ii)
Initial measurement and recognition
Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition, as financial liabilities at FVTPL, loans and borrowings, payables, or as
derivatives as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate.
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of loans and borrowings and payables, net of directly
attributable transaction costs.
The Company’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables.
Subsequent measurement
For the purposes of subsequent measurement, financial liabilities are classified in two categories:
– Financial liabilities at FVTPL
– Financial liabilities at amortised cost (loans and borrowings)
Financial liabilities at FVTPL
Financial liabilities at FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated up initial recognition
as FVTPL.
Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading if they are incurred for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term.
This category also includes derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company that are designated as hedging
instruments in hedge relationships as defined by AASB 9. Separated embedded derivatives are also classified as held for
trading unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments.
Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognised in the statement of profit or loss.
Financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition at FVTPL are designated at the initial date of recognition, and only if the
criteria in AASB 9 are satisfied.
Financial liabilities at amortised cost (loans and borrowings)
After initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the EIR
method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the liabilities are derecognised as well as through the EIR
amortisation process.
Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an
integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the statement of profit or loss.
Derecognition
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. When an
existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an
existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as the derecognition of the original
liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in the statement
of profit or loss.
iii) Offsetting of financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the statement of financial position if there
is a current enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise
the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
2.11 Trade and other payables
These amounts represent unpaid liabilities for goods received and services provided to the Company prior to the end of the
financial year. The amounts are unsecured and are normally settled within 30 to 60 days, except for imported items for which
90 or 120 day payment terms are normally available.
2.12 Borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently
measured at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is
recognised in the profit or loss statement over the period of the loans and borrowings using the effective interest method.
37
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
2
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
2.13 Income tax
The income tax expense for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the notional income
tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences
between the tax base of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, and to unused tax losses.
Deferred tax assets are only recognised for deductible temporary differences, between carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their respective tax bases, at the tax rates expected to apply when the assets
are recovered or liabilities settled, based on those tax rates which are enacted or substantially enacted for each jurisdiction.
Exceptions are made for certain temporary differences arising on initial recognition of an asset or liability if they arose in a
transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction did not affect either accounting profit or
taxable profit.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset is realised
or the liability is settled, based on the tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting
date.
Deferred tax assets are only recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses if it is probable that future
taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer
probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised
deferred tax assets are re-assessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that
future taxable profits will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognised for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of
investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the
reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Current and deferred tax balances relating to amounts recognised directly in other comprehensive income or equity are also
recognised directly in other comprehensive income or equity.
2.14 Share based payments
The Company operates equity-settled Share right-based incentive plans for its Directors and executives. All goods and
services received in exchange for the grant of any Share-based payment are measured at their fair value of the instruments
granted. Where Directors and executives are rewarded using Share right-based payments, the cost of Directors’ and
executives’ services is determined by the fair value at the date when the grant is made using an appropriate valuation model
and revalued when modified.
All Share-based remuneration is ultimately recognised in employee benefits expense with a corresponding credit to a Share
rights reserve. If vesting periods or other vesting conditions apply, the expense is allocated over the vesting period, based
on best available estimate of the number of Share rights expected to vest. Non-market vesting conditions are included in
assumptions about the number of Share rights that are expected to become exercisable. Estimates are subsequently revised
if there is any indication that the number of Share rights expected to vest differs from previous estimates. Any cumulative
adjustment prior to vesting is recognised in the current period. No adjustment is made to any expense recognised in prior
periods if Share rights ultimately exercised are different to that estimated on vesting.
When the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, the minimum expense recognised is the grant date fair value of the
unmodified award, provided the original vesting terms of the award are met. An additional expense, measured as at the date of
modification, is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair value of the Share-based payment transaction, or
is otherwise beneficial to the holder. Where an award is cancelled by the entity or by the counterparty, any remaining element
of the fair value of the award is expensed immediately through profit or loss.
2.15 Dividends
Provision is made for dividends declared, and no longer at the discretion of the Company, on or before the end of the financial
year but not distributed at the end of the reporting period.
2.16 Leases
The Company assesses at contract inception whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. That is, if the contract conveys the
right to control the use of an identifiable asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Company as a lessee
The Company applies a single recognition and measurement approach for all leases, except for short-term leases and leases
of low-value assets. The Company recognises lease liabilities to make lease payments and right-of-use assets representing the
right to use the underlying assets.
38
Li-S Energy Limited2
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Right-of-use assets
The Company recognises right-of-use assets at the commencement date of the lease (i.e. the date the underlying asset is
available for use). Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and
adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of right-of-use assets includes the amount of lease liabilities
recognised, initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease
incentives received.
Right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and the estimated useful lives of
the assets.
If ownership of the leased asset transfers to the Company at the end of the lease term or the costs reflects the exercise of a
purchase option, depreciation is calculated using the estimated useful life of the asset. The right-of-use assets are also subject
to impairment.
Lease liabilities
At the commencement date of the lease, the Company recognises lease liabilities measured at the present value of lease
payments to be made over the lease term. The lease payments include fixed payments (including in-substance fixed
payments) less any lease incentives receivable, variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate, and amounts
expected to be paid under residual lease guarantees. The lease payments also include the exercise price of a purchase option
reasonably certain to be exercised by the Company and payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term
reflects the Company exercising the option to terminate. Variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or a rate are
recognised as expenses (unless they are incurred to produce inventories) in the period in which the event or condition that
triggers the payment occurs.
In calculating the present value of lease payments, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate at the lease
commencement date if the interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable.
After the commencement date, the amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for
the lease payments made. In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification, a change
in the lease term, a change in the lease payments (i.e. changes to future payments resulting from a change in an index or rate to
be used to determine such lease payments) or a change in the assessment of an option to purchase the underlying asset.
Short-term leases and leases of low-value assets
The Company applies the short-term lease recognition exemption (i.e. those leases that have a lease term of 12 months or
less from the commencement date and do not contain a purchase option) and the lease of low-value assets recognition
exemption to leases that are considered to be low value. Lease payments on short-term leases and leases of low-value assets
are recognised as expenses on a straight-line basis over the lease term. There were no short-term or low-value leases during
the financial year.
2.17 Equity
Share capital represents the fair value of shares that have been issued. Any transaction costs associated with the issuing of
shares are deducted from share capital, net of any related income tax benefit.
2.18 Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Provisions for product warranties, legal disputes, onerous contracts or other claims are recognised when the Company has a
present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic resources will be
required from the Company and amounts can be estimated reliably. Timing or amount of the outflow may still be uncertain.
Provisions are measured at the estimated expenditure required to settle the present obligation, based on the most reliable
evidence available at the reporting date, including the risks and uncertainties associated with the present obligation. Where
there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by
considering the class of obligations as a whole. Provisions are discounted to their present values, where the time value of
money is material.
Any reimbursement that the Company can be virtually certain to collect from a third party with respect to the obligation is
recognised as a separate asset. However, this asset may not exceed the amount of the related provision.
No liability is recognised if an outflow of economic resources as a result of present obligation is not probable. Such situations
are disclosed as contingent liabilities unless the outflow of resources is remote in which case no liability is recognised.
39
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
2
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
2.19 Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities, and the accompanying disclosures,
and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that
require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets or liabilities in future periods.
Significant Management Judgements
In the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies, management has made the following judgements, which have
the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of intangibles – development costs
The Company capitalises costs for product development projects. Initial capitalisation of costs is based on Management’s
judgement, after making inquiries from engineers, scientists and other qualified professionals that technological and
economic feasibility is confirmed. In determining the amounts to be capitalised, Management makes assumptions regarding
the expected future cash generation of the project, discount rates to be applied and expected period of benefits.
Intangible assets not yet ready for use require an annual impairment test. Management has used significant judgement to
determine there was no impairment that occurred after the initial recognition of the intangible asset. Management made this
assessment on the basis that the Company has one Cash Generating Unit and the 30 June 2022 share price implied a value
for the Company and its assets well in excess of the carrying value of the intangible assets. The intangible assets approximate
1% of the current market capitalisation. The Directors also expect to achieve forward net positive cash flows in excess of the
current value of the intangible assets.
Deferred tax asset
Deferred tax asset is only recognised to the extent that there is reasonable certainty of realising future taxable amounts
sufficient to recover the carrying value. Given advancements in the Company’s activity, product development and capital
raising which has indicated a significant value for its operations an assessment has been made that it is probable that future
short term taxable income would be realised to allow the deferred tax assets to be utilised and they have been recognised with
no valuation allowance in the period.
2.20 Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Revenues and expenses are recognised net of GST except where GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not
recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as
part of the expense item.
Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable
to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the balance sheet. Cash flows are included in the cash
flow statement on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is
recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating cash flows. Commitments and contingencies
are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
2.21 Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of normal business
activities and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.
On 18 August 2022, being the date of approval of the financial report, the Directors believe it is appropriate to prepare the
financial report on a going concern basis. In making this assessment the Directors have identified and considered:
– during the whole of the 2022 financial year, and at all times subsequent, the Company has been able to meet its obligations
as and when they fell due;
the Company has $43,853,377 of cash in the bank and no fixed debt;
the Company has net assets of $50,992,716;
the Company has project plans and budgets approved by the Directors, consistent with disclosure in the Prospectus, to
complete the projects over the next year;
the likelihood of ongoing support from PPK Group Limited.
–
–
–
–
The Directors have formed a view that the Company will continue as a going concern.
40
Li-S Energy LimitedSegment information
3
The Company applies AASB 8 Operating Segments whereby segment information is presented using a “management
approach”, segment information is provided on the same basis as information used for internal reporting purposes by the chief
operating decision makers.
Operating segments have been determined based on reports reviewed by the Directors. The Directors and the Senior
Management are the chief operating decision makers of the Company. The only operating segment for 30 June 2022 is the
development and commercialisation of the Li-S Energy Battery.
4 Cash flow information
4.1 Reconciliation of cash flows from operating activities
Profit (loss) after income tax attributed to owners of LIS
(6,271,817)
(1,684,391)
Cash flows in operating activities but not attributable to operating result:
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
Non-cash flows in operating profit:
Unrealised (gain) loss on investment at FVTPL
Share based payment expense
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Finance costs
Net changes in working capital:
(Increase) decrease in trade and other receivables
(Increase) decrease in deferred tax asset
(Increase) decrease in prepaids
Increase (decrease) in trade and other payables
Increase (decrease) in employee entitlements
12
7.1
14.1
(251,736)
289,074
820,657
127,058
231,638
54,604
8,483
–
69,267
(109,619)
–
(599,008)
(36,753)
(34,911)
11,489
431,848
44,326
–
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(5,374,446)
(1,525,345)
4.2 Reconciliation of Cash
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash includes:
Cash at bank and on hand
4.3 Non-cash financing and investing activities
During the period, the Company had no non-cash financing or investing activities
43,853,377
18,606,698
9
43,853,377
18,606,698
–
–
–
–
41
Annual Report 2022
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
Income tax expense
5
(a) The prima facie tax payable (benefit) on the profit (loss) before income tax is reconciled to the income tax expense as follows:
Profit (loss) before tax
Prima facie tax payable (benefit) at 25.0% (2021: 26%)
(Non-assessable income) non-deductible expenses
Losses for which no deferred tax asset was recognised
Temporary differences for which no deferred tax asset was recognised
Transaction costs on issue of ordinary shares
Adjustments in respect of deferred income tax of previous years
Adjustment for change in statutory tax rate
Other
Income tax expense (benefit)
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
(6,271,817)
(2,283,399)
(1,567,954)
(593,684)
1,494,721
243,481
(346,235)
–
–
–
–
(12,661)
13,341
162,646
7,337
–
(599,008)
The applicable weighted average effective tax rate is as follows:
0%
26%
(b) The components of tax expense comprise:
Current tax
Deferred tax in profit and loss
Income tax expense (benefit)
(c) Recognised in the Statement of Financial Position
Tax losses
Property Plant and Equipment
Investments
Accruals
Capital Raising Costs1
Total
–
–
–
(355,849)
(243,159)
(599,008)
355,849
355,849
(26,002)
(26,002)
65,742
19,799
65,742
19,799
369,808
506,345
785,196
921,733
Note 1 At 30 June 2022, of the recognised deferred tax assets an amount of $186,188 (30 June 2021: $322,725) relating to
capital raising costs was recognised directly in equity and the balance of $183,620 was recognised in profit or loss.
(d) Not recognised in the Statement of Financial Position
Unrecognised deferred tax assets / deferred tax liabilities
Tax losses
Temporary differences
Total
1,472,400
9,666
243,481
–
1,715,881
9,666
42
Li-S Energy Limited6 Auditor’s remuneration
Remuneration of the auditor of the Company for:
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
fees for auditing the statutory financial report of the company
78,050
27,500
-
-
fees for other assurance and agreed-upon-procedures services under other
legislation or contractual arrangements where there is discretion as to whether
the service is provided by the auditor or another firm
- auditing the 31 December 2020 financial report
-
Independent Limited Assurance Report in relation to IPO
-
fees for other services
- Tax compliance and other tax related matters
Total fees to Ernst & Young (Australia)
7
Key management personnel remuneration
7.1 Key management personnel remuneration
Short-term benefits
Share-based payments
Post-employment benefits
–
43,350
13,500
69,950
28,500
5,000
149,900
115,950
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
674,091
1,148,101
2.14
820,657
127,058
29,829
–
1,524,577
1,275,159
During the reporting period, the Directors have determined that they, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Technology
Officer, the Chief Strategic Advisor and the Chief Financial Officer are the key management personnel (“KMP”). For the
30 June 2021 financial year, the Company paid two executives of BNNTTL for their assistance with the IPO but they are not
considered to be key management personnel. See the Directors’ Report for details of their remuneration policy and benefits.
7.2 Equity instruments
Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)
LIS has adopted the NED Equity Plan under which the Board of the Company may invite Non-Executive Directors to apply
for Service Rights to be issued in accordance with, and subject to the terms of the Plan. Each Service Right is an entitlement,
upon vesting and exercise, to an ordinary fully paid Share in the Company.
The following table indicates the amount of fees that a NED can sacrifice in return for a grant of Service Rights.
Financial Year
Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)
Fees Sacrifice
($)
Tranche
Number
of Service Rights
2021
2022
2023
Chairman
2021
2022
2023
80,000
80,000
80,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
1
2
3
1
2
3
160,000
160,000
160,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
43
Annual Report 2022
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
Key management personnel remuneration (continued)
7
NEDs sacrifice total Director fees of $80,000 for 160,000 Service Rights and the Chairman sacrifices total Director fees of
$120,000 for 240,000 Service Rights for each Financial Year. There is no amount payable other than the sacrificed fees for the
Service Rights. The Directors believe that accepting Share Rights in lieu of cash remuneration aligns their risk/reward with that
of the Shareholders.
The number of Service Rights are calculated by dividing the amount of sacrificed fees by the Share price of $0.50 per Share
being the price at which Shares were issued in the April 2021 capital raise. The fair value of these Service Rights at the time that
they were granted have been independently valued at $0.50 each.
The Service Rights were issued as at 1 May 2021 and vest in three equal tranches on 30 April 2022, 2023 and 2024, providing
the NED holds the office of NED on those dates. Each consecutive tranche commences annually on the vesting date of the
prior tranche. All NEDs met the vesting requirements for Tranche 1.
Service Rights may not be disposed of at any time except by force of law such as on death and Service Rights may not be
exercised prior to vesting but may be exercised at any time once they have vested but must be exercised within 90 days of
cessation of holding the office of NED and any role as an employee of the Company.
Each Service Right has a term ending 15 years after the grant date. If not exercised before the end of their term the Service Rights
will lapse. The term will be reduced if vested Service Rights are not exercised as required following cessation of being a NED.
If a NED ceases to hold the office of a NED during a tranche then Service Rights for that tranche will vest in proportion to the time
elapsed as served in the tranche. All subsequent tranches will lapse. Any unvested Service Rights that do not vest will lapse.
A NED must not enter into an arrangement with anyone if it would have the effect of limiting their exposure to risk in relation to
Service Rights (vested or unvested).
If the Board forms the view that a NED has committed an act of fraud, defalcation or gross misconduct in relation to the
Company then all unexercised Service Rights will be forfeited.
Other Key Management Personnel
LIS has adopted a plan called the Li-S Energy Limited Executive Rights Plan (Executive Rights Plan) under which the
Board of the Company may invite certain eligible persons, to apply for Service Rights or Performance Rights to be issued in
accordance with, and subject to the terms of, the Executive Rights Plan.
Each Service Right or Performance Right is an entitlement, upon vesting and exercise, to an ordinary fully paid Share in
the Company.
The Board may at any time by written instrument, or by resolution of the Board, amend or repeal all or any of the provisions of
the Plan. Non-Executive Directors are excluded from Participation in the Plan.
On 12 November 2020 Dr Lee Finniear was granted 1,000,000 Service Rights which vest in four equal tranches on
30 April 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, subject to continuity of his engagement during the Measurement Periods. The Service
Rights at the time that they were granted have been independently valued at $0.065 each and have a nil exercise price.
Each consecutive tranche commences annually on the vesting date of the prior tranche and, if Dr Lee Finniear ceases his
employment during a tranche, then Service Rights for that tranche will vest in proportion to the time elapsed as served in the
tranche and all subsequent tranches will lapse. Dr Lee Finniear met the vesting requirements for Tranche 1.
On 15 June 2022 Dr Steve Rowlands was granted 200,000 Service Rights which vest on 30 June 2022 providing he
continued to be employed up to and including that date. The Service Rights were valued at $0.425 each, being the closing
share price at the date of the grant and have a nil exercise price. Service Rights that have vested may be exercised any time
after 30 June 2024. Dr Steve Rowlands met the vesting requirements for Tranche 1.
The Service Rights may not be disposed of at any time except by force of law such as on death and Service Rights may not be
exercised prior to vesting but may be exercised at any time once they have vested but must be exercised within 90 days of
cessation of being an employee of the Company.
Each Service Right has a term ending 15 years after the grant date. If not exercised before the end of their term the Service
Rights will lapse. The term will be reduced if vested Service Rights are not exercised as required following cessation of being an
employee of the Company.
Any unvested Service Rights that do not vest will lapse.
Participants of the Executive Rights Plan must not enter into an arrangement with anyone if it would have the effect of limiting his
exposure to risk in relation to Service Rights (vested or unvested). If the Board forms the view that a Participant has committed an
act of fraud, defalcation or gross misconduct in relation to the Company then all unexercised Service Rights will be forfeited.
44
Li-S Energy Limited8 Dividends
(a) Dividends paid
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
2022 No interim dividend was declared or paid (2021: nil)
(b) Dividends declared after balance date
The directors have not declared a final dividend for the 2022 financial year (2021: nil)
2.15
(c) Franked dividends
Franking credits available for subsequent financial years based on a tax rate of 25.0%
(2020: 26%)
–
–
–
–
–
–
The above amounts represent the balance of the franking account as at the end of the financial year, adjusted for:
franking credits that will arise from the payment of the current tax liability;
a.
b. franking debits that will arise from the payment of dividends recognised as a liability at the reporting date;
c.
d. franking credits that may be prevented from being distributed in subsequent financial years.
franking credits that will arise from the receipt of dividends recognised as receivables at the reporting date; and
The amounts include franking credits that would be available to the parent entity if distributable profits of subsidiaries were
paid as dividends.
9 Cash and cash equivalents
Current
Cash at bank and on hand
10 Trade and other receivables
Current
GST receivable
Other receivables
11 Other assets
Current
Prepayments
Other
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
2.6
43,853,377
18,606,698
43,853,377
18,606,698
Notes
2.20
2.7
2022
$
2021
$
156,877
220,643
–
5,500
156,877
226,143
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
62,661
21,573
84,234
41,472
26,663
68,135
Other assets for the previous financial year related to costs incurred in relation to the LIS IPO and on the successful listing of
LIS, these costs transferred to equity.
45
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
12
Investments
Investment in Zeta Energy LLC
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
2.10
2,509,798
2,258,062
On 13 May 2022, Zeta Energy was converted from an LLC “taxed as a partnership” to a C Corporation, LIS’s interest was
converted to 1,729,000 shares of Class B common stock and Zeta Energy has confirmed the shares are valued at
USD1.00 per share at 30 June 2022. The valuation of the investment at USD1,729,000 equates to AUD$2,509,798 at the
prevailing exchange rate on 30 June 2022 of $0.6889 and the movement of $251,736 is recognised as a gain on investment
at FVTPL.
13 Property plant and equipment - non-current
Software – at cost
Less: Accumulated amortisation and impairment
Plant and Equipment - at cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation and impairment
Total property, plant and equipment of continuing operations
Reconciliations
2022
Opening balance
Additions
Disposals
Transfers
Impairment
Depreciation expense
Closing balance
2021
Opening balance
Additions
Disposals
Transfers
Impairment
Depreciation expense
Closing balance
Notes
2.8
2022
$
2021
$
15,538
6,870
(15,538)
–
–
6,870
2.8
1,154,844
127,036
(63,290)
(13,133)
1,091,554
113,903
1,091,554
120,773
Software
$
Plant &
Equipment
$
Total
$
6,870
113,903
120,773
8,668
1,027,808
1,036,476
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(15,538)
(50,157)
(65,695)
–
1,091,554
1,091,554
–
–
–
6,870
127,036
133,906
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(13,133)
(13,133)
6,870
113,903
120,773
Included in $1,027,808 of additions for property, plant and equipment are $117,917 of employee costs capitalised in relation to
the installation of the pilot plant production facilities in the Waurn Pond campus.
46
Li-S Energy Limited
13 Property plant and equipment - non-current (continued)
13.1 Employee benefits expense capitalised
Wages and salaries
Post-employment superannuation
Amount capitalised in property, plant and equipment
Amounts capitalised in intangible assets
14 Right-of-use assets - non-current
Right-of-use assets – at cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation and impairment
Total right-of-use assets
Carrying amount at start of year
Additions
Disposals
Transfers
Depreciation and impairment expense
Carrying amount at end of year
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
794,100
40,813
(117,197)
(310,800)
406,916
13
15
–
–
–
–
–
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
343,295
(124,471)
218,824
–
343,295
–
–
(124,471)
218,824
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
LIS leases two production bays that are beside each other in Deakin’s ManuFutures advanced manufacturing hub in Waurn
Ponds, Victoria. Each lease consists of 157 square metres space, a 58 square metre office and monthly rent of $4,741 plus GST
with a CPI increase at each anniversary date. One lease expires on 31 December 2023 and the other lease expires on 30 June
2024, there are no options for further terms.
14.1 Reconciliation depreciation
Short term lease expense
Property, plant and equipment
Right-of-use asset
15
Intangible assets - non-current
Development costs
Less: Accumulated amortisation and impairment
Total intangibles
Notes
11
13
14
2022
$
41,472
65,695
124,471
2021
$
41,471
13,133
–
231,638
54,604
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
2.9
3,317,963
991,863
–
–
3,317,963
991,863
47
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
15
Intangible assets - non-current (continued)
Reconciliations
2022
Opening balance
Additions
Disposals
Transfers
Impairment
Depreciation & amortisation expense
Closing balance
2021
Opening balance
Additions
Disposals
Transfers
Impairment
Amortisation expense
Closing balance
Li-Nanomesh
$
Lithium-
sulphur
Battery
$
Total
$
–
991,863
991,863
508,300
1,817,800
2,326,100
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
508,300
2,809,663
3,317,963
428,080
428,080
563,783
563,783
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
991,863
991,863
The intangible asset is for the development of the Lithium-sulphur battery and the Li-Nanomesh battery projects undertaken
by Deakin University under the Research and Development Agreement. Included in $1,817,800 of additions for intangibles are
$310,800 (Note 13.1) of employee costs capitalised for the development work undertaken in relation to the intangible assets
being developed.
16 Trade and other payables - current
Trade payables – unsecured
Sundry payables and accruals - unsecured
17 Lease liabilities
Current
Lease liabilities
Total current
Non-Current
Lease liabilities
Total Non-current
48
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
374,024
20,117
369,468
423,280
743,492
443,397
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
2.16
2.16
101,309
101,309
95,980
95,980
–
–
–
–
Li-S Energy Limited18 Provisions
Current
Annual leave
Total current
Non-Current
Make good
Total Non-current
19 Share capital
19.1 Issued capital
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
2.18
2.18
44,326
44,326
40,000
40,000
–
–
–
–
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
640,200,230 (2021: 600,200,230) ordinary shares fully paid
56,688,707
22,994,841
Movements in ordinary share capital
Balance at the beginning of the financial period
New shares issued, net of transaction costs
22,994,841
663,366
2.17
33,693,866
22,331,475
56,688,707
22,994,841
The shares have no par value. Ordinary shares participate in dividends and the proceeds of winding up in proportion to the
number of shares held. Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote at shareholder meetings.
19.2 New shares issued
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
Movements in number of ordinary shares
Issued for cash on 16 September 2021 @ $0.85 per share on initial public offering
Less: transaction costs
Unwind of tax effect of transaction costs on issue of share capital in prior years,
deductible over five years
New shares issued for cash, net of transaction costs
Settlement on 15 July 2020 as part of capital raise @ $0.65 per share
Less: transaction costs
Shares issued for cash, net of transaction costs
Issued for cash on 9 April 2021 as part of capital raise @ $0.50 per share
Less: transaction costs
Shares issued for cash, net of transaction costs
34,000,001
(169,597)
(136,538)
33,693,866
3,250,000
(162,800)
3,087,200
20,000,000
(755,725)
19,244,275
Total shares issued on acquisition, net of transaction costs
33,693,866
22,331,475
49
Annual Report 2022
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
19 Share capital (continued)
19.3 Share movements
Movements in number of ordinary shares
Opening balance
New shares issued1
Shares issued2
Share split on a 500,000 for 1 basis – restated3
Shares issued4
Closing balance
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
600,200,230
51,020,409
40,000,000
4,999,614
56,020,023
504,180,207
560,200,230
40,000,000
640,200,230 600,200,230
1
2
3
4
On 16 September 2021, issued 40,000,000 shares for cash at $0.85 per share
On 15 July 2020, issued 4,999,614 shares for cash at $0.65 per share.
On 22 October 2020, the Directors resolved to split the shares on a 10 for 1 basis, restating total shares to 560,200,230.
On 9 April 2021, issued 40,000,000 shares for cash at $0.50 per share.
20 Reserves
Share option reserve
Share premium reserve
Movement in reserves
20.1 Share options reserve
Opening balance
Issue of service rights under the NED Equity Plan
Issue of service rights under Executive Rights Plan
Closing balance
2022
$
2021
$
947,715
127,058
1,347,650
1,347,650
2,295,365
1,474,708
2022
$
127,058
2021
$
–
707,047
110,000
113,610
17,058
947,715
127,058
The share options reserve is used to recognise the value of equity settled share-based payments granted as service rights to
Non-Executive Directors under the NED Equity Plan and to the Key Management Personnel under the Executive Rights Plan
as part of their remuneration (see Note 7.2).
50
Li-S Energy Limited20 Reserves (continued)
20.2 Share premium reserve
Opening balance
Movement
Closing balance
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
1,347,650
1,347,650
–
–
1,347,650
1,347,650
The share premium reserve is to recognise the difference between the value of the investment in Zeta Energy Corp. (see Note 12)
of $2,010,916 at the date of the investment and the 1,020,409 shares issued to Zeta Energy Corp. LLC at $0.65 per share at the
same time with a value of $663,266.
20.3 Capital Risk Management
The Company considers its capital to comprise its ordinary share capital, reserves and retained earnings.
In managing its capital, the Company’s primary objective is to ensure its continued ability to provide a consistent return for
its equity shareholders through capital growth and distributions. In order to achieve this objective, the Company seeks to
maintain a gearing ratio that balances risks and returns at an acceptable level and to maintain a sufficient funding base to
enable the Company to meet its working capital and strategic investment needs. In making decisions to adjust its capital
structure to achieve these aims, either through new share issues or incurring debt, the Company considers not only its
short-term position but also its long-term operational and strategic objectives.
21 Financial risk management
Financial Risk Management
The Directors have overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the financial risk management framework.
The Company’s activities expose it to a range of financial risks including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company’s
risk management policies and objectives are therefore designed to minimise the potential impacts of these risks on the results of
the Company where such impacts may be material.
21.1 Market risk
Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate because
of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises three types of risk: interest rate risk, equity price risk and currency risk.
Financial instruments affected by market risk include loans and borrowings, deposits, debt and equity investments.
(i) Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a security will fluctuate due to changes in interest rates.
Exposure to interest risk arises due to holding floating rate interest bearing liabilities, investments in cash and cash equivalents
and loans to related parties and other persons. The Company was not exposed to significant interest rate risk during the year.
(ii) Equity price risk
Equity securities price risk is the risk that changes in market prices will affect the fair value of future cash flows of the
Company’s investments.
The Company is exposed to equity price risk through the movement in its membership interest in its investment in
Zeta Energy LLC if and when Zeta Energy LLC raises capital or completes its initial public offering and is listed on a
stock exchange. The equity price risk is determined by market forces and are outside the control of the Company.
The risk of loss is limited to the capital invested. A 1% movement in equity value would cause a movement in the
investment of approximately $25,000 (2021: $22,000).
(iii) Currency Risk
Currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial item will fluctuate as a result of movements
in foreign exchange rates. The Company’s exposure to foreign exchange relates to its investment in Zeta Energy Corp. a
company domiciled in USA. The Company manages the foreign exchange risk by monitoring the potential benefits of the
strategic and economic benefits of this investment and, the ability to divest the investment should the need arise.
51
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
21 Financial risk management (continued)
21.2 Credit Risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Company.
At balance date, the Company does not have material exposure to credit risk. All cash is invested with Tier 1 Australian banks.
21.3 Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities.
The Company’s objective to mitigate liquidity risk is by monitoring forecast cash flows and ensuring that adequate facilities
or financing options are maintained. At balance date, the Company has cash of $43,853,377 and current liabilities of $889,127
which are primarily for the year end 30 June 2022. The payables of $743,492 share a contractual maturity of 15-45 days.
22 Fair value of financial investments
The carrying values of financial assets and liabilities listed below approximate their fair value.
Estimated discounted cash flows were used to measure fair value, except for fair values of financial assets that were traded in
active markets that are based on quoted market prices.
Hierarchy
The following tables classify financial instruments recognised in the statement of financial position of the Company according
to the hierarchy stipulated in AASB13 as follows:
– Level 1 – the instrument has quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
– Level 2 – a valuation technique is used using inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for financial
instruments, either directly (i.e. as prices), or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); or
– Level 3 – a valuation technique is used using inputs that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
31 June 2022
Non-current assets
Unlisted equity securities
30 June 2021
Non-current assets
Unlisted equity securities
Notes
Level 1
$
Level 2
$
Level 3
$
Total
$
12
12
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2,509,798
2,509,798
2,509,798
2,509,798
2,258,062
2,258,062
2,258,062
2,258,062
The level 3 fair value assessment of unlisted equity securities has been based on advice provided by the investee company as
to the most recent capital raise completed by it on or about 30 June 2022. This amount per share in United States Dollars has
been converted to Australian Dollars at the prevailing exchange rate of $0.6889 at 30 June 2022 (Note 12).
23 Contingent assets and contingent liabilities and commitments
Plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Other
Notes
2022
$
76,301
2021
$
–
2,963,272
307,815
210,000
–
3,249,573
307,815
LIS has made partial payments for plant and equipment that is to be delivered after the reporting date. At that time, LIS will
take ownership of the assets but only has a commitment at the reporting date. The Research and Development Agreements
with Deakin (see Note 25) have specified dates for the services to be paid. As at the reporting date, LIS has commitments
totalling $2,963,272 for services to be performed which will occur after the reporting date. These projects range in duration
from six months to two years.
There are no contingent assets or contingent liabilities.
52
Li-S Energy Limited24 Earnings (loss) per share
Profit/(loss) after tax
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding used in calculating basic
earnings per share1
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding used in calculating diluted
earnings per share1, 2
Basic earnings (loss) per share (cents)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (cents)
30 June 2022
$
30 June 2021
$
(6,271,817)
(1,684,391)
No. of
Shares
No. of
Shares
631,652,285
567,131,895
631,652,285
567,131,895
(0.99)
(0.99)
(0.29)
(0.29)
Note 1
Note 2
The weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the current
year include the 40,000,000 shares issued on 16 September 2021 for the capital raise of $34,000,000. The comparative year has been
adjusted for the impact of the share split on the shares issued on 15 July 2020 and the shares issued on 9 April 2021.
The weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding used in calculating diluted earnings per share has not been adjusted for
2,160,000 Service Rights granted under the NED Equity Plan and 1,000,000 Service Rights granted under the Executive Rights Plan
(Note 7.2) as they are anti-dilutive.
25 Related party transactions
25.1 Transactions with Directors and Key Management Personnel
Details of the nature and amount of each element of the remuneration of each director and key management personnel
(‘KMP”) of LIS and consulting fees to other related parties are shown in the table below:
Short Term Benefits
Salary &
Fees
($)
Cash
Bonus(2)
($)
Non-
Monetary
($)
Post
employment
Super-
annuation
($)
Long Term
Benefits
($)
Termination
Payments
Share
Based
Payments(1)
($)
Total
($)
Performance
Related
%
2022
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
Total Directors
Other KMP
–
–
–
–
–
L Finniear
276,432
S Row lands(3)
201,659
G Molloy(4)
196,000
K Hostland(5)
Total Other
Total KMP
–
674,091
674,091
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
23,568
6,261
–
–
29,829
29,829
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
235,681
235,681
157,122
157,122
157,122
157,122
157,122
157,122
707,047
707,047
28,610
328,610
85,000
292,920
–
–
196,000
–
113,610
817,530
820,657
1,524,577
–
–
–
–
–
9
29
–
–
14
0
(1)
Equity settled share based payments. Each tranche of the service rights granted are expensed over the vesting period from the date of granting
to the date that the last tranche vests resulting in a proportionally larger expense recognised in the earlier years. Share based payments for
directors are not performance related but are in lieu of salary and fees.
S Row lands w as remunerated as a citizen of the UK for part of the financial year.
(2) Cash bonuses for the current year are assessed by the Board after completion of the financial statements, hence, are nil for this financial year.
(3)
(4) Remunerated through a consulting agreement on 12 June 2021 at an agreed hourly rate for w ork undertaken on behalf of LIS.
(5) Remunerated by PPK Group Limited.
53
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
25 Related party transactions (continued)
Short Term Benefits
Salary &
Fees
($)
Cash
Bonus(3)
($)
Non-
Monetary
($)
Post
employment
Super-
annuation
($)
Long Term
Benefits
($)
Termination
Payments
($)
Share
Based
Payments(1)
($)
Total
($)
Performance
Related
%
2021
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
–
–
R Levison(2)
16,667
100,000
A McDonald(2)
16,667
200,000
H Cray
G Pullen
Total Non-
Executive
Executive
–
–
–
–
33,334
300,000
G Molloy(2)
16,667
400,000
Total Executive
16,667
400,000
Total Directors
50,001
700,000
Other KMP
L Finniear(2)(4)
98,100
100,000
K Hostland
M Winfield
G Walsh
–
–
–
100,000
50,000
50,000
Total Other
98,100
300,000
Total KMP
148,101
1,000,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
-
-
-
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
-
-
-
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
-
-
-
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
-
-
-
–
–
–
–
–
–
36,668
24,444
24,444
24,444
–
36,668
141,111
241,111
24,444
–
110,000
443,334
-
-
416,667
416,667
110,000
860,001
17,058
215,158
–
–
–
100,000
50,000
50,000
17,058
415,158
127,058
1,275,159
–
71
83
–
–
96
96
46
100
100
100
(1)
(2)
(3)
Equity settled share based payments. Each tranche of the service rights granted are expensed over the vesting period from the date of granting
to the date that the last tranche vests resulting in a proportionally larger expense recognised in the earlier years.
Salary & Fees include directors fees paid from 1 July 2020 to 30 April 2021 and consulting fees paid from 14 February 2021 to 30 June 2021.
Cash bonus was paid for work undertaken in relation to the Li-S Energy IPO and was above normal work responsiblities. Bonuses were invested
in shares in Li-S Energy in off-market-transfers at $0.50 per share.
(4) Cash bonus was in relation to a sign-on fee for leaving his previous place of employment.
The following table details the total compensation each Non-Executive Director is entitled to receive in relation to their duties
as a Director of LIS, the Directors do not receive any additional fees for participation on any Committees.
Director
Dr Ben Spincer
Mr Robin Levison
Mr Tony McDonald
Ms Hedy Cray
Directors’ Fees $
(including superannuation)
120,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
Director fees for Ben Spincer include his responsibilities as the Chairman.
LIS has adopted the NED Equity Plan under which the Board of the Company may invite Non-Executive Directors to apply
for Service Rights to be issued in accordance with, and subject to the terms of the Plan. Each Service Right is an entitlement,
upon vesting and exercise, to an ordinary fully paid Share in the Company. The following table indicates the amount of fees
that a NED can sacrifice in return for a grant of Service Rights.
54
Li-S Energy Limited25 Related party transactions (continued)
Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)
Chairman
Financial
Year
Fees Sacrifice
($)
Tranche
Number of
Service
Rights
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
80,000
80,000
80,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
1
2
3
1
2
3
160,000
160,000
160,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
NEDs will sacrifice total Director fees of $80,000 for 160,000 Service Rights and the Chairman will sacrifice total Director fees
of $120,000 for 240,000 Service Rights for each Financial Year. There is no amount payable other than the sacrificed fees for
the Service Rights.
The number of Service Rights are calculated by dividing the amount of sacrificed fees by the Share price of $0.50 per Share
being the price at which Shares were issued in the April 2021 capital raise. The fair value of these Service Rights at the time that
they were granted have been independently valued at $0.50 each.
The Service Rights were issued as at 1 May 2021 and will vest in three equal tranches on 30 April 2022, 2023 and 2024,
providing the NED holds the office of NED on those dates. Each consecutive tranche commences annually on the vesting
date of the prior tranche.
As at the end of the financial year, the number of ordinary shares in LIS held by each KMP for the year ended 30 June 2022 is
set out below:
2022
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
Total Directors
Other KMP
L Finniear
S Rowlands
G Molloy(1)
K Hostland
Total Other
Total KMP
(1)
Entered into a consulting agreement on 12 June 2021.
Share
Balance at
Start of Year
Shares
Acquired
Shares Sold
Share
Balance at
End of Year
200,000
–
2,776,917
13,632
866,961
–
27,201
140,750
3,871,079
154,382
200,000
–
6,440,784
504,295
7,145,079
–
–
–
24,771
24,771
11,016,158
179,153
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
200,000
2,790,549
866,961
167,951
4,025,461
200,000
–
6,440,784
529,066
7,169,850
11,195,311
55
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
25 Related party transactions (continued)
2021
Directors
Non-Executive
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
Total Non-Executive
Executive
G Molloy(1)
Total Executive
Total Directors
Other KMP
L Finniear
Total Other
Total KMP
Share
Balance at
Start of Year
Shares Issued
via PPK’s
In- specie
Dividend
Shares
Acquired
Shares Sold
Share
Balance at
End of Year
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
200,000
1,576,917
1,200,000
166,961
700,000
–
27,201
1,743,878
2,127,201
5,640,784
800,000
5,640,784
800,000
7,384,662
2,927,201
–
–
200,000
200,000
7,384,662
3,127,201
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
200,000
2,776,917
866,961
27,201
3,871,079
6,440,784
6,440,784
10,311,863
200,000
200,000
10,511,863
(1)
Resigned as a Director on 11 June 2021.
As at the end of the financial year, the number of service rights in LIS held by each KMP for the year ended 30 June 2022 is set
out below:
Balance
at Start of
Year(1)
Granted
During the
Year
Vested
Exercised
Forfeited
Vested &
Unexercised
Balance at End of Year
Unvested
2022
Unvested Unvested
No
%
No
No
%
No
No
Maximum
$
Value to
Vest(2)
Directors
B Spincer
720,000
– 240,000
100%
R Levison
480,000
A McDonald
480,000
H Cray
480,000
–
–
–
160,000
100%
160,000
100%
160,000
100%
Total Directors 2,160,000
– 720,000
Other KMP
L Finniear
1,000,000
– 250,000
100%
S Rowlands
–
200,000 200,000
100%
Total Other
1,000,000 200,000 450,000
Total KMP
3,160,000 200,000 1,170,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
240,000 480,000
70,200
160,000 320,000
64,251
160,000 320,000
64,251
160,000 320,000
64,251
720,000 1,440,000 262,953
–
250,000 750,000
19,333
– 200,000
–
–
– 450,000 750,000
19,333
– 1,170,000 2,190,000 282,286
(1)
(2)
There w ere nil vested and unexercised rights at the beginning of the year.
The maximum value of service rights to vest has been calculated as the amount of the grant date fair value of the service rights yet
to be expensed.
56
Li-S Energy Limited25 Related party transactions (continued)
Balance at
Start of
Year
Granted
During the
Year
Vested
Exercised
Forfeited
Vested &
Unexercised
Balance at End of Year
Unvested
2021
Vested Unvested
No
%
No
No
%
No
No
Maximum
$
Value to
Vest(1)
Directors
B Spincer
R Levison
A McDonald
H Cray
–
–
–
–
720,000
480,000
480,000
480,000
Total Directors
– 2,160,000
Other KMP
L Finniear
Total Other
Total KMP
– 1,000,000
– 1,000,000
– 3,160,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
720,000
360,000
480,000
240,000
480,000
240,000
480,000
240,000
2,160,000 1,080,000
1,000,000
65,000
1,000,000
65,000
3,160,000 1,145,000
(1)
The maximum value of service rights to vest has been calculated as the amount of the grant date fair value of the service rights yet to be expensed.
25.2 A summary of the related party transactions with other entities during the period is as follows:
Management fees paid to PPK
Purchase of BNNT from BNNTTL
Research and development payments to Deakin
Lease payments to Deakin
Lease payments received from WGL
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
600,000
200,000
54,682
5,000
1,941,678
560,899
133,448
47,874
–
–
During the financial year, LIS had the following related party agreements in place:
Supply Agreement with BNNTTL
On 9 July 2021, a supply agreement for the supply of BNNTs, with a purity of at least 95% or otherwise agreed, for the purpose of using
BNNTs in the development, testing and manufacture of the LIS batteries. The key terms of the supply agreement are as follows:
– LIS may only order from BNNTTL to use BNNTs in the Customer’s development, testing and manufacture of batteries or any
–
other purpose agreed between the parties in writing; and
the initial term of the agreement is 5 years and it automatically renews for further 2 year terms unless LIS elects not to renew
the agreement by giving at least 3 months’ notice prior to the expiry of the latest term.
Distribution Agreement with BNNTTL
On 9 July 2021, a worldwide exclusive distribution agreement pursuant to which LIS is appointed as distributor for BNNT
products, with a purity of at least 95% or otherwise agreed, within the battery industry, with certain exclusive distribution rights
in respect of lithium-sulphur batteries. The key material terms of the distribution agreement are as follows:
– LIS may only buy BNNTs from BNNTTL to:
(c)
distribute on an exclusive basis BNNTs to third party customers (Customers), provided the Customers are only permitted
to use BNNTs to develop, test or manufacture lithium-sulphur batteries; and
(d)
distribute on a non-exclusive basis BNNTs to Customers, provided the Customers are only permitted to use BNNTs to:
a. develop, test or manufacture batteries that are not lithium-sulphur batteries (including to stockpile BNNTs for later use
in accordance with forecasts); and
b. manufacture nanomesh products incorporating BNNTs (including Li-Nanomesh) for the use in any form or type of battery;
and any other purpose agreed between the parties in writing.
57
Annual Report 2022Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2022
25 Related party transactions (continued)
– LIS is not restricted from distributing Li-Nanomesh (or other nanomesh products), or BNNTs to LIS’s customers who have a
licence from LIS to manufacture Li-Nanomesh (or other nanomesh products).
–
the initial term of the agreement is 5 years and it automatically renews for further 2 year terms unless LIS elects not to renew
the agreement by giving at least 3 months’ notice prior to the expiry of the latest term.
Management Services Agreement with PPK Aust
On 9 July 2021, a management services agreement pursuant to which PPK Aust will provide administrative functions such
as accounting, record keeping, reporting, legal, company secretarial support, IT/systems support, etc. It is also appointed, to
the extent permitted by law to facilitate/oversee the funding and capital raising requirements of the company and is paid a
funding fee of up to 1% of any debt or capital raised that it facilitates. PPK Aust will also provide staff to act in key officer roles
including the public officer, chief financial officer and company secretary. The key material terms of the management services
agreement are as follows:
– PPK Aust is paid a fee for providing the management services, which the scope of services to be provided and the fee is
–
reviewed and agreed between the parties every 3 months;
the agreement is for an initial term of 3 years and can be renewed by PPK Aust for a further 3 year term upon notice being
provided by PPK Aust not later than 3 months prior to the expiry of the initial term;
–
–
PPK Aust may terminate the agreement on 30 days’ notice if it is not satisfied with the Annual Plan of LIS; and
LIS may terminate the agreement at will on 6 months’ notice.
– LIS indemnifies PPK Aust for any loss that arises from the performance by PPK Aust of its obligations under the agreement.
Research Framework Agreement with Deakin
On 8 July 2021, a research framework agreement which governs all research projects conducted between LIS and Deakin as
set out in Project Schedules made under the agreement. The key material terms of the research framework agreement are as
follows:
– The parties may from time to time enter into Project Schedules made under the agreement for research projects proposed
and negotiated by the parties. Such Project Schedules include terms around payment, steering committees, specified
personnel of the parties and insurances required (see Note 12); and
– Each party will retain ownership of their respective intellectual property developed prior to the date a Project commences
or is acquired or developed independent of the agreement but grants a non-transferrable licence to the other party to
use such background intellectual property for the purposes of the relevant Project. Any new intellectual property created,
developed or discovered in the conduct of a Project vests in LIS (Project IP) and Deakin is granted a non-exclusive,
perpetual, non-transferable, royalty free licence to use the Project IP for the purposes of the Project and for non-
commercial research, teaching and scholarly pursuits.
Lease Agreements with Deakin
LIS leases for two production bays that are beside each other in Deakin’s ManuFutures advanced manufacturing hub in Waurn
Ponds, Victoria. Each lease consists of 157 square metres space, a 58 square metre office and monthly rent of $4,741 plus GST
with a CPI increase at each anniversary date. One lease expires on 31 December 2023 and the other lease expires on 30 June
2024, there are no options for further terms.
On 20 July 2021, PPK Aust., Deakin and BNNTTL the Shareholders Agreement was terminated.
25.3 LIS has the following related party balances owing to its major shareholders at the reporting date:
PPK Group Limited
Deakin University
See Notes 14 and 23 for other related party information.
Notes
2022
$
2021
$
–
80,000
302,084
–
26 Events subsequent to the end of the reporting period
On 14 July 2022, LIS loaned $1,400,000 to PPK Mining Equipment Group for a period of 12 months at 8.0% interest. The loan
is secured against a property in Mt Thorley, NSW which was independently valued at $2,000,000.
There have been no other matter or circumstance that has arisen since the end of the financial period which is not otherwise
dealt with in this report or in the Financial Statements that has significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations
of the Company, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Company in subsequent financial years.
58
Li-S Energy LimitedDirectors’ Declaration
for the year ended 30 June 2022
1.
In the opinion of the Directors of Li-S Energy Limited;
a. The financial statements and notes of Li-S Energy Limited are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including
(i)
Giving a true and fair view of is financial position as at 30 June 2022 and of its performance for the financial year ended
on that date; and
(ii) Complying with Australia Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the
Corporations Regulations 2001; and
There are reasonable grounds to believe that Li-S Energy Limited will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due
and payable.
The Directors have been given the declarations required by Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 from the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2022.
b.
2.
3.
Note 2 confirms that the consolidation financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors:
Ben Spincer
Chairman
Brisbane,
18 August 2022
Robin Levison
Non-Executive Director
59
Annual Report 2022
Independent Auditor’s Report
Ernst & Young
111 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia
GPO Box 7878 Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel: +61 7 3011 3333
Fax: +61 7 3011 3100
ey.com/au
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Li-S Energy Limited
Report on the audit of the financial report
Opinion
We have audited the financial report of Li-S Energy Limited (the Company), which comprises the
statement of financial position as at 30 June 2022, the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year then
ended, notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies, and
the directors’ declaration.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial report of the Company is in accordance with the
Corporations Act 2001, including:
a. Giving a true and fair view of the Company’s financial position as at 30 June 2022 and of its
financial performance for the year ended on that date; and
b. Complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial
report section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the auditor
independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the
Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants (including Independence Standards) (the Code) that are relevant to our audit of the
financial report in Australia. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with
the Code.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our opinion.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in
our audit of the financial report of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of
our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, but we do not provide
a separate opinion on these matters. For each matter below, our description of how our audit
addressed the matter is provided in that context.
We have fulfilled the responsibilities described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the
financial report section of our report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit
included the performance of procedures designed to respond to our assessment of the risks of
material misstatement of the financial report. The results of our audit procedures, including the
procedures performed to address the matters below, provide the basis for our audit opinion on the
accompanying financial report.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
62
60
Li-S Energy Limited
Independent Auditor's Report
Li-S Energy Limited
Page 2
Capital Raise and Associated IPO Costs
Why significant
As set out in Note 19, the Company undertook
an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) in the period
and raised $34.0 million. In connection with the
IPO, transaction costs of $2,551,758 were
incurred by the Company. Transaction costs of
$2,382,161 were recorded in profit and loss for
the year and the balance of $169,597 recorded
against equity.
The recognition of these amounts was a key
audit matter due to the judgement involved in
allocating costs between equity and the profit
and loss.
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
We performed the following procedures in
respect of the capital raise and associated
transaction costs:
► Assessed the Company’s policy of recording
equity and associated costs for compliance
with Australian Accounting Standards.
► Agreed the proceeds of the capital raising to
bank statements and share registry
documentation.
► Tested, on a sample basis, the transaction
costs incurred by agreeing them to
supporting invoices and agreements.
►
Independently recalculated the allocation of
costs to equity and the profit and loss using
share registry documents.
► Assessed the adequacy of disclosures
included in the financial statements.
Capitalisation of Development Costs
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
At 30 June 2022, the carrying amount of the
capitalised development costs totalled
$3,317,963. As set out in Note 15 to the
financial statements the Company capitalises
costs related to the development of battery
products. Product development is core to the
Company’s operations and requires judgement
as to whether it meets the capitalisation criteria
of AASB 138 Intangible Assets.
The capitalisation of battery development costs
was a key audit matter due to the significant
management judgements, including:
► Whether the costs incurred relate to
research, which are required to be expensed
or development costs which are eligible for
capitalisation
► The assessment of the useful life of
capitalised battery development costs and
when amortisation should commence
We performed the following procedures in
respect of the development costs capitalised:
► Assessed the Company’s accounting policy
for the capitalisation of battery development
costs for compliance with Australian
Accounting Standards
► Held inquiries with senior management and
the development project team members, to
understand development activities
undertaken and the feasibility of completion
of those activities
►
Inspected the Company’s in-progress
development site at Deakin University in
Victoria
► For a sample of capitalised battery
development costs, we tested whether:
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
63
61
Annual Report 2022
Independent Auditor’s Report
continued
Independent Auditor's Report
Li-S Energy Limited
Page 3
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
► The assessment of future economic benefits
and impairment testing of the capitalised
battery development costs.
► Additions were appropriately supported
by approved payroll records including
employee time records or third-party
documentation
► The nature of the expenditure met the
capitalisation criteria under AASB 138
Intangible Assets.
► Considered if any assets should commence
amortisation.
► Assessed the Company’s impairment
analysis.
► Assessed the adequacy of disclosure
included in the financial statements.
Information other than the financial report and auditor’s report thereon
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the
information included in the Company’s 2022 annual report but does not include the financial report
and our auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and accordingly we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon, with the exception of the Remuneration Report
and our related assurance opinion.
In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial
report or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this
other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial report
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the
financial report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
In preparing the financial report, the directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters relating to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to
cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
64
62
Li-S Energy Limited
Independent Auditor's Report
Li-S Energy Limited
Page 4
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial report
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an
audit conducted in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material
if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of this financial report.
As part of an audit in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional
judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
►
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to
fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit
evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not
detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from
error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control.
► Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control.
► Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.
► Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting
and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to
events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw
attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial report or, if such
disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit
evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions
may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.
► Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial report, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial report represents the underlying transactions and events
in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of
the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we
identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical
requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other
matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions
taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
65
63
Annual Report 2022
Independent Auditor’s Report
continued
Independent Auditor's Report
Li-S Energy Limited
Page 5
From the matters communicated to the directors, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the financial report of the current year and are therefore the key audit
matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter
should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would
reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on the audit of the Remuneration Report
Opinion on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in the directors’ report for the year ended 30
June 2022.
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Li-S Energy Limited for the year ended 30 June 2022,
complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Responsibilities
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the
Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in
accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Ernst & Young
Brad Tozer
Partner
Brisbane
18 August 2022
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
66
64
Li-S Energy Limited
Shareholder Information
as at 9 August 2022
Fully paid ordinary shares:
(a) Total shares issued:
(b) Percentage held by 20 largest shareholders:
(c) Total number of LIS shareholders:
640,200,230
80.19%
10,820
(d) Shareholders with less than marketable parcel of shares:
3,022
(e) There is not a current on market buy-back
(f)
Voting rights: Every shareholder present personally or by proxy or attorney etc, shall, on a show of hands, have one vote
and on a poll shall have one vote for every share held. No voting rights attach to options.
(g) Distribution schedule of fully paid ordinary shares:
Holdings Ranges
1 - 1,000
1,001 - 5,000
5,001 - 10,000
10,001 - 100,000
100,001 Over
Total
Total holders
Units
4,268
3,941
1,132
1,253
226
2,046,933
10,744,217
8,689,436
37,166,672
581,552,972
10,820
640,200,230
% Units
0.32%
1.68%
1.36%
5.81%
90.84%
100.00%
(h) Top 20 Holders of Ordinary Fully Paid Shares:
Rank Name
1
PPK Aust Pty Limited
2 Deakin University
3 BNNT Technology Limited
4 YJK Pty Ltd
5 Baozhi Yu
6
7
Tao Tao
IP44 Pty Ltd
8 Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited
9 CS Third Nominees Pty Limited
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above